Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-02-15_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 15, 2005 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of February 1, 2005 II. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS - As per Pre -List dated February 9, 2005, TOTAL $192.26 III. ADIOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL ESENTATION - 1VHNNESOTA SAFE AND SOBER * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of February 1, 2005 and Special Meetings of January 29, 2005 and February 1, 2005; and closed meeting of February 1, 2005 H. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS -. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. If Council wishes to proceed, action by resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council required to pass if improvement is petitioned for; 4/5 favorable rollcall if no petitions. Rollcall A. PUBLIC HEARING ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION - South Harriet Park West Roadway Improvement No. A -204 Rollcall B. PUBLIC HEARING ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION - Sunnyslope Neighborhood Roadway Improvement No. BA -326 III. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Zoning Ordinances: First Reading requires affirmative rollcall votes of three Council members except that a rezoning from residential to non - residential requires four affirmative votes. Second Reading requires affirmative rollcall votes of three of Council to pass except rezoning from residential to non- residential requires four affirmative votes. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall votes of four members of Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council members required passing. Conditional Use Permit: Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council members required to pass. Variance Appeal: Favorable rollcall of Council Members present to uphold or deny appeal Rollcall A. PUBLIC HEARING - 2005 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM Agenda /Edina City Council February 15, 2005 Page 2 Rollcall B. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN - Frauenshuh Companies.. 7700 France Avenue South. Generally located north of I-494 and west of France Avenue Rollcall C. ORDINANCE NO. 2005-2 - Subdivision Moratorium IV. AWARD OF BID * A. Front End Loader - Public Works * B. Utility Vehicle Braemar Golf Course V. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS * A. Resolution 2005 -13 Supporting 1-494 Improvement * B. Municipal Recycling Grant Agreement 2005 -2007 with Hennepin County C. Boards and Commissions Survey D. Traffic Safety Report of February 3, 2005 E. Big Bowl Restaurant On -Sale Intoxicating and Sunday Sale Liquor. Licenses VI. FINANCE * A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per Pre -List dated February 2, 2005, TOTAL $474,656.61; and February 9, 2005, TOTAL $520,623.40 VII. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS VIII. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS DC. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES X. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL XI. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEM Mon Feb 21 PRESIDENTS DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED.- City Hall Closed Tues ' Mar 1 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Mar 15 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Apr 5 Regular Meeting 7 :00 P.M. Mon Apr 11 Board of Appeals & Equalization 5:00 P.M. Thur Apr 14 Volunteer Recognition Reception 5:00 P.M. Tues Apr 19 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Mon Apr 25 Continuation Date Board of Appeals 5:00 P.M. Tues May 3 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues May 17 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Mon May 30 MEMORIAL DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBER EDINBOROUGH PARK COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL FEBRUARY 1, 2005 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Housh, Masica, Swenson and Chair Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Roush and seconded by Commissioner Swenson approving the Consent Agenda for the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR JANUARY 18, 2005, APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Housh and seconded by Commissioner Swenson approving the Minutes of the regular meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for January 18, 2005. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Commissioner Housh and seconded by Commissioner Swenson approving the payment of claims dated January 27, 2005, and consisting of one page totaling $58,703.78. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda, Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned. Executive Director R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Coura Check Register 211012005 — 2110/2005 Check 0 Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO 0 Doc No Inv No Aoaount No 17946 211012008 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 192.26 TAX SETTLEMENT 105909 TIF088.1 9132.4009 192.26 Subledger Account Desalption TAX INCREMENTS 192.28 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Cheek Total 192.26 Total Payments 192.26 21912005 . 8:23:48 Page. 1 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKE TAX DISTRICT R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 2/912005 8:23:50 CowxM Check Summary Page - 1 Company 09000 HRA FUND Amount 192.28 Report Totals 192.28 2110=5 - 2/10/2005 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and procedures date City m,''Sigi The cost is based can the Nalional Satl'rty Council figures for the. cost ofdcallis and injuries ill ('71a"hcs and accidents in 20024.111d is the most recent fivgures Zvi= huge. 'Ylle.se art: the tigul-es that are used ill national Statistics Glad by n'to"'t i stlr:ancc f'rilups. %VC have the ea.re:t number of de,`iath:i and intltrics b'% st1l:.I•11% in the state: howcVcr. the nu nbers of severe. moderate and nai4tc+r illjuries arcs not hroku►a Nolan I \ e:ountN or City in the -'t'raash Facts Reporl' ". I used an alverat;e cif the actual nwnherti of those injuries ill klimaes +eta ►. So While it Illav 1101 hc, exaua it is vet.v cl().,;e te) the aactttal cost of cr,ashc,, in i'din:a. In the past ten tears in Minnesota there hms been an incre.rse oaf: 502,11.03 Licensed Dri,%ers anti the number of licensed vehicles have increased by 1,1.03,261. i"dinat, 2002: in N)(12 there were Fatalities, 30 Injuries in 22() crashes and 5741 Properly D alum, Crtaslacs in the city cif Edina. There werc: c0 f wcr in'tarics and a 36 fewer orone:rtV chill we cra zlies in'?()0" than 11 191)" its yite«I tlac incr�::rsccl atylii. driven'. i Iaiti is an that drivers are usim, that salt bells more W)d driVirr- 11CUCT hectttISC 01'411C edrlsr116011 and enlurce;ment provided by the I ?din:a Polices T)cparimeial. Edina Crash Costs ill 2002: In addition to tilt. reduction in (lies cost. of crashes, injtuic:s and deaatlis tile aware sive e;nflorcement tactics of the Vdiraa police department has resulted in a reduction elf erinac Calid criminal :as~.t,ivi4ies. ('riratin llti ha.,c: ass little respw for traffic laws as they tit► iilr other law-s however. they do nut cu►nmit crimes NVIlm they 111tce• a good chance of l�ciat ., aapprchended. When they ,see highly visible ntiirct lnclit they oo clsewhero W C011111ait their crimes. Traffic tittillti Lire rz,ponsibic fiar:IWMI of fclony arrt:st• nationally, Notable Crur►anals such ca.,. '('ed Bundy. David 1:3 A• owitz (Son (a1'Saam), Wayne W illi.ims (killed 28 children) and Timothy McVeigh and many others were apprel'tcnded i►s as resole of tra.ft ic.° stops sail W"Irrtnts, Tratllic prcab1VJlls .are the alutrtber one caLINC tal'c;Omhl:tints to hail °y police department in the. country. Traffic problems lire: quality of fire, issues and ollell are the resent uTpCrCCptit +n, : 'I pt,rson sta ndinu in their yard "Ith their children has a much dill �re:nt perception of a ve'hieli at 35.MPH than the- driver that-just ca ntc ol'fof the f vewa�, The public education your Tlol.ice deparmlent docs is sas in7port;anl cis calhfTrl;craaint ill rCttucidlZ', tl'1C�e. Ciltitl %n 1i4t itjuries. rCpairs aand the griefto families and commmiity. Finally the leadership and hatQkln,,, of the: political hody, community. press and le-adership ot` dic police: dq)ariralent is the most impor•iaant part ofany col'orce.nlent. prOlvaana. Udiria is tortuna is to have rears stipliort in their cor1117it.lnitl', S 1, J)40.000 W) 3,120,000.00 21 Sc.vcre Injuries u�. 49,500,00 ..r ` 1.039,500.00 107 tic+dcratz injuries S 1(000,00 - $ 1.765.500.0 174 ttinttrinjuries if,' 9.400.00 = S 1.6 "t 5.600,0 574 Property Dalliaae i fi ?()l ?.l)t1 `S T. 1 I)t)t }_00 Total `- S 11,291,600.01) In addition to tilt. reduction in (lies cost. of crashes, injtuic:s and deaatlis tile aware sive e;nflorcement tactics of the Vdiraa police department has resulted in a reduction elf erinac Calid criminal :as~.t,ivi4ies. ('riratin llti ha.,c: ass little respw for traffic laws as they tit► iilr other law-s however. they do nut cu►nmit crimes NVIlm they 111tce• a good chance of l�ciat ., aapprchended. When they ,see highly visible ntiirct lnclit they oo clsewhero W C011111ait their crimes. Traffic tittillti Lire rz,ponsibic fiar:IWMI of fclony arrt:st• nationally, Notable Crur►anals such ca.,. '('ed Bundy. David 1:3 A• owitz (Son (a1'Saam), Wayne W illi.ims (killed 28 children) and Timothy McVeigh and many others were apprel'tcnded i►s as resole of tra.ft ic.° stops sail W"Irrtnts, Tratllic prcab1VJlls .are the alutrtber one caLINC tal'c;Omhl:tints to hail °y police department in the. country. Traffic problems lire: quality of fire, issues and ollell are the resent uTpCrCCptit +n, : 'I pt,rson sta ndinu in their yard "Ith their children has a much dill �re:nt perception of a ve'hieli at 35.MPH than the- driver that-just ca ntc ol'fof the f vewa�, The public education your Tlol.ice deparmlent docs is sas in7port;anl cis calhfTrl;craaint ill rCttucidlZ', tl'1C�e. Ciltitl %n 1i4t itjuries. rCpairs aand the griefto families and commmiity. Finally the leadership and hatQkln,,, of the: political hody, community. press and le-adership ot` dic police: dq)ariralent is the most impor•iaant part ofany col'orce.nlent. prOlvaana. Udiria is tortuna is to have rears stipliort in their cor1117it.lnitl', MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL FEBRUARY 1, 2005 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Housh, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Swenson approving the Council Consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF TANUARY 18, 2005, AND SPECIAL MEETING OF TANUARY 18, 2005, APPROVED Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Swenson approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 18, 2005, and the Special Meeting of January 18, 2005, for the Edina City Council. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. CITIZEN COMMENDED - DEAN WICKSTROM Chief Siitari indicated that on January 7, 2005, the most prolific bank robber in Minnesota history chose the Real Financial Center in Edina for his next robbery. Mr. Wickstrom portrayed heroism by stepping up, and putting himself at risk, followed the robber out of the bank and waited for the Police Department to arrive and arrest the suspect. Mr. Siitari awarded Mr. Wickstrom with the Edina Police Department Departmental Commendation for rendering public service entailing quick thinking and exceptional bravery resulting in the arrest of the Fishing Hat Bandit. *HEARING DATE SET OF FEBRUARY 15, 2005 - FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, FRAUENSHUH COMPANIES (7700 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH) Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Swenson setting a hearing date of February 15, 2005, for Final Development Plan for Frauenshuh Companies, 7700 France Avenue South. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -9 - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT REPROGRAMMING (CDBG) APPROVED - FUNDING FOR CORNERSTONE Planner Larsen indicated that currently $80,000 remained in the 2003 CDBG Scattered Site Affordable Housing budget, which must be spent by May 1, 2005, or the funds must be returned to Hennepin County. He stated Edina had no projects that would qualify to use the funds. However, Mr. Larsen reported the City received a request from Cornerstone for funds to assist in the $135,542 renovation of two apartment buildings (8 - two bedroom units located in Bloomington at 8041 and 8101 12th Avenue). The apartments would provide housing for victims of domestic abuse and their children. Cornerstone, founded in 1983, has included Edina in its service area for over twenty years. He noted reprogramming $80,000 from the 2003 CDBG budget in support of Cornerstone's project would prove to not only support a vital service to the community, but would add to the City's efforts of advancing affordable housing in the greater metro area. Page 1 Minutes/Edina City Council/February 1, 2005 Mr. Larsen stated staff recommended approving the reprogramming of $80,000 of the 2003 Community Development and Block Gr ant (CDBG) funds from Scattered Site Affordable Housing to Cornerstone for the renovation of eight apartment units to be used for emergency shelter purposes. Council comments: Member Masica asked if removing the $80,000 would affect only funds carried over from 2003, whether any opportunities existed for use of . the funds in Edina, if the funds requested by Cornerstone from Eden Prairie had been approved, and if the funds would be earmarked for single family affordable housing. Mr. Larsen explained that no project in Edina could meet the timeline for use of the 2003 CDBG funds. He said he did not know whether the Eden Prairie request had been approved. Mr. Larsen said Cornerstone serves client from Edina and that the requested funds would be used for multi- family housing. Member Housh recollected that a similar situation happened previously with St. Louis Park. He inquired whether the funds have to be used, for physical construction or could it be used for development of affordable housing. Mr. Larsen said historically funds have been used for services for qualifying individuals, however, this line item was a bricks and mortars type of line. Member Swenson inquired whether closer scrutiny should be done for future projects. Mr. Larsen said the budget was prospectively set and the best guess in this cage did not work. Mayor Hovland said previously the Council has been provided with numbers depicting a percentage of persons in Edina that were served by Cornerstone. Mr. Larsen said that information was not requested. Mayor Hovland inquired how children who have seen violence in their homes were handled. Susan Neis, Director of Cornerstone, said they have a well- defined children s program including youth counselors and a mentorship program. Classes were also available to help parents learn coping techniques. Ms. Neis said 200 - 220 Edina residents were annually served by Cornerstone. She added there was no decrease in domestic violence but she sees an increase in families reaching out for help. Member Masica inquired whether the funds were from the county or were federal funds. Mr. Larsen responded the funds were federal. Member Masica introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION-NO. 200579 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE REPROGRAMMING OF $80,000 OF 2003 URBAN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM FUNDS AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF THE REQUIRED THIRD PARTY AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the City of Edina, through execution of a Joint Cooperation Agreement with Hennepin County, is cooperating in the Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina has programmed $80,000 of 2003 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant funds for the Scattered Site Affordable Housing Activity; and WHEREAS, the City proposes the reprogramming of the 2003 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant, Scattered Site Affordable Housing funds totaling $80,000 to Cornerstone to assist in the renovation of two, four unit apartment buildings to be used for emergency shelter purposes. Page 2 Minutes/Edina City Council/Februga 1, 2005 BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Edina approves the reprogramming of $80,000 from.the 2003 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program, Scattered Site Affordable Housing activity to Cornerstone for the purpose of assisting in the renovation of three, four unit apartment buildings to be used for emergency shelter purposes. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor and the City Manager to execute the required Third Party Agreement on behalf of the City to implement the reprogramming of $80,000 from the 2003 Community Development Block Grant Program. ADOPTED: the 1gt day of February, 2005. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *BID AWARDED FOR 2005 FORD EXPLORER 4 X 4 (FIRE DEPARTMENT) Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Swenson for award of bid for a 2005 Ford Explorer 4 X 4, four door SUV (Fire Department) to recommended bidder, Superior Ford under MN State Contract #433405 at $25,619.64. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR TORO LAWN TRACTOR - PARK DEPARTMENT Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Swenson for award of bid for a new Toro GM 3500 -D 3 X 3 Lawn Tractor to MTI Distributing under State Contract #432120, at $24,620.67 including sales tax. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. 2005 BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES ANNUAL MEETING DATE SET Manager Hughes said the Annual Meeting for the Boards, Commissions and Committees was typically held the last week in March. Following a brief Council discussion, the Annual Meeting date was set for March 29, 2005, at Centennial Lakes Park Centrum at 5:00 P.M. DISCUSSION HELD - APPOINTMENT TO CITY COUNCIL Mayor Hovland said applications have been received from sixteen persons interested in filling the City Council vacancy. He reported a seventeenth application was received after the filing date was closed. After a short discussion, Council consensus was to not consider the late application. Mayor Hovland indicated that a process must be developed and he suggested interviewing all sixteen applicants. He further suggested that three interviews be held within each one -hour time slot with the appointment being made at the March 1, 2005, Council meeting. Member Masica suggested interviewing four applicants at a time in sets of four, selecting from the four sets and then completing a more in -depth interview time of the individuals selected. Member Housh said he was impressed with the applicants. He said individual interviews in an individual setting would be his choice of process. Member Swenson noted her preference with individual interviews. Following a brief discussion, dates for interviews for the applicants to fill the Council vacancy would be held in the City Hall Community Room, dates/ times as follows: Page 3 Minutes/Edina City Council/February 1, 2005 February 15, 2005 February 16, 2005 February 18, 2005 5:00 P.M. - 7:00 P.M. 5:30 P.M. - 7:30 P.M. 5:00 P.M. - 6:30 P.M. Applicants would be contacted to arrange interview times. No formal Council action was taken. RESOLUTION NO. 2005-10 - RECEIVE FEASIBILITY REPORTS -1) IMPROVEMENT NO. A -204 (SOUTH HARRIET PARK WEST) AND 2) IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -326 (SUNNYSLOPE ROAD) Mr. Hughes noted that Feasibility Studies have been completed for the South Harriet Park West Roadway Improvement No. A -204 and for the Sunnyslope Neighborhood Roadway Improvement No. BA -326. Staff recommended acknowledging receipt of the reports. Member Housh introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2005-10 ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY REPORTS FOR SOUTH HARRIET PARK WEST ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT NO. A -204 AND SUNNYSLOPE NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -326 WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve the South Harriet Park West Neighborhood streets and also to improve the Sunnyslope Neighborhood streets, and to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of said improvements No. A -204 and BA -326, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429; and WHEREAS, the Edina City Engineer has prepared a feasibility report for the South Harriet Park West Roadway Improvement No. A -204 and the Sunnyslope Neighborhood Roadway Improvement No. BA -326; WHEREAS, the reports provide information regarding whether the proposed projects are cost effective and feasible. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby receives the feasibility reports for Improvement No. A -204 and Improvement No. BA -326. Passed and adopted this 18t day of February 2005. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. APPOINTMENT TO BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES APPROVED Mayor Hovland indicated his intention to appoint interested persons to fill open terms on the City Boards, Commissions, and Committees as follows: BOARD /COMMISSION COMMITTEE NAME TERM Art Center Board Alexandra Sifferlin Student Community Health Committee Robert Scott Term to 2/1/08 Heritage Preservation Board Ian Yue Student Lou Blemaster Term to 2/1/07 Karen Ferrara Term to 2/1/07 Human Rights & Relations Commission Deborah McNeil Term to 2/1/08 John Goetz Term to 2/1/07 Park Board Jessica Selleck Student Todd Fronek Term to 2/1/06 Planning Commission Floyd Grabiel Term to 2/1/08 Recycling and Solid Waste Commission Mariko Hanson Student Dan Rasmus Term to 2/1/07 Page 4 I Minutes/Edina City Council/February 1, 2005 Mayor Hovland made a motion approving the slate of persons interested in serving the City's Boards, Commissions and Committees as presented. Member Masica seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Member Housh made a motion and Member Swenson seconded the motion approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated January 20, 2005, and consisting of 27 pages: General Fund $201,789.37; Communications Fund $11,416.72; Working Capital Fund $118,740.04; Art Center Fund $4,559.34, Golf Dome Fund $334.95; Aquatic Center Fund $37.99; Golf Course Fund $8,485.34, Ice Arena Fund $1,774.43, Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $19,669.78, Liquor Fund $108,922.42; Utility Fund $841,998.70, Storm Sewer Fund $22,339.97; Recycling Fund $20.00; PSTF Fund $2,855.24; TOTAL $1,342,944.29; and for approval of payment of claims dated January 27, 2005, and consisting of 23 pages: General Fund $298,390.72, CDBG Fund $18,225.03; Communications Fund $1,993.18, Working Capital Fund $1,773.19; Construction Fund $95.10, Art Center Fund $533.41; Golf Dome Fund $6,967.32; Aquatic Center Fund $24,840.03, Golf Course Fund $5,845.70; Ice Arena Fund $2,591.46; Edinborougb/Centennial Lakes Fund $5,232.06, Liquor Fund $88,120.06; Utility Fund $5,844.02; Recycling Fund $51.07; PSTF Fund $4,429.88; TOTAL $464,932.23. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. CONCERN OF RESIDENTS Jon Blumenthal, 5941 Grimes Avenue South, stated his opposition to a one - hundred percent special assessment for roadway improvements because of the distressing financial burden placed upon the homeowners. Giovanna Ingram, 6000 France Avenue, said the one - hundred percent assessment would be a financial hardship on their family. She commented that a new generation of residents was moving into Edina, ones that were more vocal about issues. Arlene Forrest, 4400 West 50th Street, member of Edina League of Women Voters (LWV), inquired about appointments/ reappointments of terms on the Edina Boards, Commissions, Committees. The LWV has adopted a position of the organization of government, that the League was in favor of action to support responsive legislative processes characterized by accountability, representedness, decision - making capabilities and effective performance. She specifically said there were inconsistencies on the website regarding term limits for members and asked that information be more readily available. The League has researched other cities, which have adopted procedures to limit terms on certain boards, and have attendance requirements. Ms. Forrest said the LWV believed this would be something Edina should consider. Jean Hanson, 6708 Cornelia Drive, stated there were numerous qualified residents who would like to serve on volunteer boards, commissions, and committees, but there were no opportunities to serve. She added that agendas and minutes of the certain boards /commissions /committees were not on the website. She encouraged term limits be set as well as better communication from the boards/ commissions/ committees. Member Housh spoke from experience that fresh voices were good, but the experience of senior members serving on board was extremely valuable. Page 5 Minutes/Edina City Council/February 1, 2005 Mr. Hughes explained terms for most boards /commissions /committees were for three years. Annually, at the reappointment time, a letter was sent over the Mayor's signature making inquiries of existing members whose terms were up, asking if they were interested in being reappointed. Mr. Hughes said the Mayor then evaluates the responses and recommends reappointments. Mayor Hovland commented that he looked at the attendance records and when reappointments were completed a reminder about attendance requirements was included. in the correspondence. Member Housh asked that staff provide the Council with an overview on common practices in other communities. After a discussion, staff was directed to provide the Council with an overview of common practices from other cities as well as protocol for all boards /commissions /committees as it refers to the website. Ed Luterbach, 5913 Halifax Avenue, said he was part of the Halifax /Grimes reconstruction project. He said he heard a comment about, "how would you feel if you had just paid a full assessment for a .project and then have your taxes raised ". He indicated that would be very concerning. His neighborhood petitioned the City for their road reconstruction to save money and not to wait. Mr. Luterbach concluded he did not want his area to be double taxed when they were just being proactive. Jim Grotz, 5513 Park Place, suggested studying the past fifteen years of roadway reconstruction and places a time and present value on the project and assesses those residents, moderately, for the upcoming projects. Member Housh. explained historically all residents have been assessed 100% on local streets that were improved. Those that benefited from the roadway reconstruction. paid 100 %. He said a new approach was being studied that may be more fair because other folks use the streets as well. Mr. Grotz added that roads benefit the community as a whole while dollars spent on expenditures such as gymnasiums only benefit a small - group. Rich Lovdal, 5933 Halifax. Avenue, commended the engineering staff with the way the roadway reconstruction project turned out yet added paying for it will be a hardship. Betsy Robinson, 5021 Ridge Road, commented it seems that Edina feels it was so 'special' that we can do what other cities don t do. She was a 25 -year resident and did not know that she was not paying for roads, thinking her taxes covered them. If her road was improved and assessed for ten years and she moved before the ten years was up, the new owners would benefit with, a new road and no assessment. Ms. Robinson suggested a tax -base funding for roads be established. Member Housh said road improvements were included in taxes not reconstruction. Member Swenson made a motion to adjourn to the Mayor's Conference Room, for a closed session, exhibiting the attorney /client privilege, to discuss litigation and options for the City regarding a decision on the Indian Hills Subdivision, Pederson vs. the City of Edina. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 9:30 P.M. City Clerk Page 6 N MQNUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT THE EDINA SENIOR CENTER JANUARY 29, 2005, 8 :00 A.M. ROLLCALL: Answering rollcall were Members Housh, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland, Also in attendance were the following members of the Edina Planning Commission: Steve Brown, David Byron, John Lonsbury, Michael Schroeder, Geoff Workinger. Also in attendance were the following members of the Edina Transportation Commission: Joni Bennett, Dean Dovolis, Warren Plante, Fred Richards, Marie Thorpe, Les Wanninger, and Jean White. In attendance as well were the following staff members: Gordon Hughes, Eric Anderson, Ceil Smith, Wayne Houle, Steve Lillehaug, and Craig Larsen. PRESENTATION OF PRELIMINARY PLANS - SOUTHDALE CORRIDOR STUDY Manager Hughes welcomed the Council, the Planning Commission, and the Transportation Commission to the Special Workshop and introduced Mark Koegler, Jeff McMenimen and Rusty Fifield of the Hoisington - Koegler Group, and Fred Dock of Myer - Mohaddes and Associates, Transportation Consultants, who were prepared to provide an update concerning the Southdale Corridor Study. Mr. Koegler introduced the topic by providing background information concerning the work that had been done to date. He noted to the Council that a technical advisory committee and a community advisory committee had been formed for the purpose of overseeing the planning study. This study was a joint effort between the City of Edina and Hennepin County and introduced Larry Blackstad and Katie Walker, staff members of the County who were present. Mr. Koegler noted that a "futures committee" also was formed to provide a long -term perspective for the Southdale area at the onset of the study.. Mr. Koegler introduced Rusty Fifield of the Hoisington - Koegler Group, who provided an overview of the key findings that had been made to date. He also referenced the community meeting that was held last fall for the purpose of gathering input from the broader Edina community with respect to the Southdale corridor. He noted that a second community meeting was scheduled to be held on February 10, 2005. Mr. Fifield thereupon provided an overview of the key objectives and goals that had been established for the planning study. Mr. Fifield introduced Jeff McMenimen of the Hoisington- Koegler Group, who presented three land -use concepts for the study area. He noted the key differences between each concept. He also asked the Council, Planning Commission and Transportation Commission to provide feedback concerning the strengths and weaknesses of each concept within the next 10 days. Mr. Koegler pointed out that their hope was to consolidate the strengths of each one of the three concepts in order to create a fourth land -use concept for further consideration. 1 Fred Dock, of Myer - Mohaddes provided an overview of the various traffic and transportation challenges and opportunities in the Southdale corridor. He particularly noted issues with pedestrian circulation and mass transit opportunities for the area. The Council, Planning Commission and Transportation Commission thereupon posed numerous questions and observations concerning the strengths and weaknesses of each of the three land -use concepts. The consulting team advised that all comments and observations would be taken into account and following the February. 10, 2005, community meeting, further work would be done on the plans and presented again to the Council, Planning Commission and Transportation Commission at a future workshop. Mr. Hughes thanked all. participants for giving their time to review the status of the studies. There being no further business, the Mayor adjourned the meeting at 10:10 A.M. Respectfully submitted, - Gordon L. Hughes, Acting City Clerk N MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL ON FEBRUARY 1, 2005 AT 5:30 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Housh, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Mayor Hovland explained the purpose of the meeting was to receive information on the City's Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Program and the potential methods of funding an expanded program. Wayne Houle, City Engineer, reviewed the last work session, which covered: • Need to reconstruct roadways Curb and gutter needs to be part of projects Increasing costs of projects Special Assessments Mr. Houle graphically depicted the areas in Edina without curb and gutter. He said sixteen per cent of the roadways in Edina do not have curb and gutter. Mr. Houle explained the grade of the roadway and surrounding area aids in determination of the style of curb and gutter. He displayed a graphic showing areas with bulkhead vs. surmountable curb and gutter, explaining that bulkhead curb controls storm water more effectively. Assistant Manager Anderson reviewed the existing assessment policy, which has two categories: residential streets and State -Aid Streets. He said the current policy was based on trip generation. It has been assumed that that same amount of trips are generated from average single - family homes regardless of density. One residential equivalent unit (REU) equals one single family home and assumes approximately 12 -14 trips per day. Mr. Anderson reviewed a proposed new residential street assessment policy as follows: • Minimum contribution per household is proposed. This "floor' amount represents the road benefit to each house based on trips that are generated by residential property • City will contribute a percentage of the road reconstruction cost, but not below the floor amount • Homes on State -Aid streets must contribute a minimum of 50% of the street construction cost not to exceed the floor assessment amount. This would be an increase from the current 20% contribution rate • New policy would be implemented on a "go- forward" basis. No reimbursement for past projects recommended. Past projects net assessments ranged from $1,800- $4,000 Mr. Anderson briefly reviewed some potential scenarios applying the proposed policy to some neighborhood improvements and employing different City contribution levels. He noted the recommended "floor" amount was $8,000 with a City contribution of 25 %. Mr. Anderson explained using this floor amount and City contribution, the City would need to cover between approximately $400,000 and $790,000 in the General Fund between 2005- Minutes/Edina City Council Work Session/February 1, 2005 2009, noting the 2005 portion would have to be collected in 2006 or later since 2005's. budget has already been certified. Mr. Anderson presented the following funding alternatives: • Tax Levy "Front Loaded" over next four years - options to reduce initial impact o Supplement Levy with Non -Tax Revenues: ■ Reduction in Capital. Improvement .Program Expenditures and transfer of revenue to Road Construction Program ■ State Aid Maintenance Funds Transfer from Construction Fund to Road Program o Spread the 2005 program over longer term- 4/5 years o Interest Only Debt Service on Public Works Garage until levy evens out o Defer some neighborhood street reconstruction - Note: need to offset savings with greater maintenance dollars Mr. Anderson reported the impact upon the annual levy with an $8,000 minimum and 25% City contribution could lead to tax increases of up to 8.21% depending upon the amount. of work and the year of the levy. He reviewed the factors impacting taxes; which included: • State Aid Construction Contribution due to increased assessment to homeowner (20 to 50 %) cannot occur. until 2007 - Interlachen Sidewalk Program and 1- 494/TH 169 Interchange • 2010 - two of the City's TIF districts will expire and captured Tax Capacity will reduce City's tax rate by approximately 5% • 2014 other TIF districts will expire and reduce City's tax rate by an additional 5% • Transportation Utility bills introduced and referred to committees in the legislature Council discussed the issues to be considered including: • Possibility of Transportation Utility being allowed • Need for maintenance of infrastructure • Need to keep in mind long term stewardship of City while acknowledging the emotional testimony of those impacted by roadway.reconstruction • Attempt to maintain infrastructure as painlessly as possible • Need to authorize improvement projects while reviewing assessment policy • Backlog of 35 year old roads to be fixed - not prudent to not improve them How assessments on commercial properties affect residential properties • Need to call and sell bonds before a final determination has been made of how to proceed with assessment policy There being no further business on the Council Agenda, the Mayor adjourned the meeting at 6:50 p.m. City Clerk �7 MINUTES OF THE CLOSED SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD IN THE MAYOR CONFERENCE ROOM OF CITY HALL FEBRUARY 1, 2005,8:50 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Housh, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Staff present were Manager Hughes, Attorney Gilligan, Planner Larsen, and Clerk Mangen. Mayor Hovland stated that the purpose of this Closed Special Council Meeting was to discuss the Pedersen vs. City of Edina litigation. Attorney Gilligan informed the Council Members they may only discuss the options available to the City resulting from Judge Heidi Schellhas summary judgment. Mr. Gilligan said the judges' findings were that the subdivision should have been granted, that the moratorium was not valid, but that the City's subdivision ordinance was constitutional. The Council discussed the options open to them. Mr. Gilligan was directed to research whether the Wiling could be amended and to report on his findings.to the City Council at their February 15, 2005 meeting. Mayor Hovland declared the closed meeting adjourned at 9:25 P.M. No other business was discussed or action was taken. City Clerk REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # II. A. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE /, Consent ❑ City Engineer W Information Only ❑ Date: February 15, 2005 Mgr: Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: . Public Hearing for South ® To Council Action Motion Harriet Park (West) Resolution Neighborhood Roadway Improvement A -204. ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: If the Council determines the project to be warranted and necessary, Council shall adopt a resolution approving South Harriet Park (West) Neighborhood Roadway Improvements, City Improvement No. A -204, authorize plans and specifications to be completed and bids taken. Info /Background: This project was partially initiated by a resident petition to address storm sewer and curb and gutter issues along West 53`d Street. This petition is included in the packet. As part of the City of Edina Roadway Improvement Program, staff expanded the area to include Brookview Avenue, Oaklawn Avenue, and Kellogg Avenue from West 54h Street to West 52nd Street including West 52nd Street. The proposed project involves reconstructing the existing roadway that includes installing new concrete curb and gutters, rehabilitating the watermain and sanitary sewer, and extending the storm sewer system. The estimated roadway construction cost is $808,000. This cost does not include costs for City utility repairs; staff is analyzing these repairs and will include them with final plans; funding for these repairs will be funded through the respective utility funds. Funding for the roadway will be from a special assessment of approximately $8,700 per residential equivalent unit (REU). The Feasibility Study is included with this report, along with all correspondence received to date. Staff analyzed the project and feels that the project is feasible from an engineering standpoint. G: \lmprovements\A204 South Harriet Park West \MISC \Feasibiltiy\RRpublic hearing - A204.doc w9t��1� o� a FEASIBILITY STUDY — A204 J ay ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS SOUTH HARRIET PARK (WEST) NEIGHBORHOOD JANUARY 26, 2005 LOCATION: The South Harriet Park (West) Neighborhood project includes Brookview Avenue, Oaklawn Avenue and Kellog Avenue bounded by West 52nd Street and West 54th Street, and West 52nd Street and West 53 t Street bounded by Wooddale Avenue and Brookview Avenue (see Figure 1). 5119 vwv P 1 t 5112 5113 512 5131 N 5115 If; F�;101' to Pro ject 5114 512 N 4421 5117 � Boundary 5133 5116 51� 52ND S .... 5201 a 3 Y C ° 5301 5201 W 3 8 m 5304 53RD ST W 5200 5308 5311 5301 5300 5209 5301 5324 5305 5200 5328 5213 5212 5309 5211 521 5307 5217 5216 5312 5217 5220 a 5221 5220 a 5221 5224 5230 5237 5224 5331 5225 5228 N P 0 5228 5232 5241 i 5329 5233 Y � 5232 5328 5236 523 5245 5236 5237 5240 5241 5236 5300 a 3 Y C ° 5301 5300 W 3 8 m 5304 53RD ST W 5304 5308 5311 5301 5300 5319 5301 5324 5305 5304 5328 5305 5320 5309 5308 5324 5307 5343 5313 5312 5351 5313 a 5317 5316 a 5325 W 5320 5331 0 5325 5324 0 5337 i 5329 Y 5328 5333 L553 5337 5336 54TH ST W 4500 5401 5400 5401 5300 a 3 Y C ° 5301 5300 W 3 8 m 5304 5305 5304 5308 5311 5308 5318 5319 5312 5324 5325 5316 5328 5331 5320 5332 5337 5324 5336 5343 5328 5346 5351 5348 5357 5336 5400 5401 5400 Project Area O e q South Harriet Park (West) A -204 Figure 1. Protect Area Map N W +E S Engineering Dept January, 2005 Feasibility Study South Harriet Park (West) Neighborhood Imp. No. A -204 January 26, 2005 INITIATION & ISSUES: The South Harriet Park (West) Neighborhood project was initiated partially by a resident petition to address drainage problems along West 53`d Street. The Engineering Department expanded this area and included the neighborhood as outlined in Figure 1 as part of the City's planning process to update the critical infrastructure within this neighborhood. The following are existing features that present issues in determining the feasibility of the project and are addressed in this report: • Surface rainwater drainage issues • Frequent watermain and service breaks • Poor condition of existing pavement • Existing landscaping, retaining walls, driveways, etc. • Existing overhead utility lines and poles • Existing mature trees • Existing lighting EXISTING CONDITIONS: The majority of the roadways and utilities in this neighborhood were originally constructed in the late 1930's and 1940's. The roadway widths vary in this neighborhood ranging from 22 -ft to 30 -ft with no curb and gutter and no sidewalks. The pavement condition varies throughout the neighborhood but is in relatively poor condition overall (see Photo 1). r�A- Photo 1. Existina Pavement Condition Street grades within the neighborhood vary slightly but are relatively flat and level. There is some existing storm sewer in the area, but overall the surface drainage is very poor. Page 2 of 7 Feasibility Study South Harriet Park (West) Neighborhood Imp. No. A -204 January 26, 2005 In recent years, watermain and water service breaks are occurring with increased frequency in this neighborhood while minimal sanitary sewer blockages have been reported. Many property owners have placed boulders or other obstructions within the City right -of -way creating barriers along the roadway. These types of barriers and landscaping items are prohibited from being placed in the boulevard in accordance with Edina City Code. 1200.02. Other typical items exist adjacent to the roadway such as retaining walls, concrete driveways, landscaping, shrubs, trees and fences. Most of the private utilities in this neighborhood are overhead (with the exception of the gas lines). Street lighting consists of standard "cobra head" lights mounted on wood poles that are typically located at the intersections. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: This project involves reconstructing the existing bituminous pavement, constructing new curb and gutter, replacing the existing watermain, replacing the water services from the new watermain to the curb boxes (valves located at the property lines), repairing the sanitary sewer where needed, extending the storm sewer to accommodate the new concrete curb and gutter and installing drain tile where needed to allow the property owners to connect their sump pump discharges directly into the storm sewer system. A neighborhood informational meeting was held on November 8, 2005 to gather data and answer questions the homeowners had relating to the project. Over 25 residents attended this meeting. Input from this meeting and comments received throughout the planning of this project have been included in this report as an attachment. A neighborhood survey was sent to learn the favorability of constructing concrete curb and gutters, relocating the overhead utility lines to underground and installing decorative street lights with this project. The results of the survey are shown in Table 1. *Note: Based on a 1 to 3 ranking system. (Traditional was most favored with the lowest average ranking of 1.55) Table 1. Survey Results Page 3 of 7 Prefer Overhead Utilities Returned Relocated to Prefer Decorative Street Survey Prefer Curb & Gutter Under round Lights Total Surveyed Yesl No B-HEADS-MOUNT Yes No Yesl No Style* Colonial Acorn Traditional 84 68 29 39 28 27 13 55 23 43 of Returned Surveys 81% 43%157% 41% 40% 19% 81% 34%63% 1.75 2.141 1.55 *Note: Based on a 1 to 3 ranking system. (Traditional was most favored with the lowest average ranking of 1.55) Table 1. Survey Results Page 3 of 7 Feasibility Study South Harriet Park (West) Neighborhood Imp. No. A -204 January 26, 2005 The following is a summary regarding the survey results including staff's recommendations: • The majority of residents do not prefer new concrete curb and gutter — Staff recommends constructing concrete curb and gutter in this neighborhood. Concrete curb and gutter tends to be more cost effective over the life of the street, reduces pavement failure, provides safety, controls drainage, provides driveway and traffic control, and aids cleaning and snow plowing. Concrete curb and gutter is specifically needed to properly address the drainage issues throughout the neighborhood. • The majority of residents do not prefer relocating overhead utilities to underground — Staff does not recommend pursuing this issue since a direct benefit to each property for this improvement is difficult to substantiate. However, residents may pursue this option and coordinate directly with the utility companies if desired. (Staff will assist coordinating with the utility companies if requested.) • The majority of residents do not prefer installing decorative street lighting — Staff does not recommend including decorative street lighting with this project since a direct benefit to each property for this improvement is difficult to substantiate. The survey results indicated that a barrier style curb (13618, B -Head) is more desirable versus the surmountable style curb (drive -over, S- mount). Staff recommends installing a barrier style curb and gutter as it will work well with the existing topography within this neighborhood (see Figure 2). A barrier style curb provides the best control of water runoff and better defines the roadway while providing protection to the sod and pavement edge from snowplow damage in the winter months. B618 C ❑NC CURB & GUTTERS R 3' 6' b, R1/2' AT 3/8' R 3' 6• SLOPE ,3/4' PER BASE j Y f •,7 112' 1R, i 8' - Figure 2. Typical Barrier /Bulkhead Curb and Gutter The pavement throughout this neighborhood appears to be at the end of its useful life while the costs to maintain and repair the roadways are steadily increasing — Overlaying or seal coating the pavement in this neighborhood is not feasible. The proposed roadway widths range from 25 -ft to 27 -ft (back -to -back of curb). The varying roadway widths accommodate the neighborhood by Page 4 of 7 Feasibility Study South Harriet Park (West) Neighborhood Imp. No. A -204 January 26, 2005 minimizing impacts to the surrounding topography. Intersection geometrics are proposed to be revised at the intersection of Oaklawn Avenue and Brookview Avenue to reduce the pavement area and create a more standard T- intersection (see Figure 3). Trees will be protected and impacts to the trees will be minimized. ro Ilk r 0 % ♦, +�. .'��` seat _ •` -. t 7%.' �r.•�! � 521, s .. Lj 52A 523] '� W zee - •S ,> J i 5228 �.. 'k- W.53RD ST. 534 f '� ti3n,; � ♦ _ y � ,fir -,� m♦ � - .!� a +. S':44 ` 530. }3,1 ♦xs :.Oa Ave Figure 3. Proposed Project Layout F 7k a � Page 5 of 7 W � � Y I' S32a t j st3 3312 W s C3 r j sate• � l' idd, —1 Its 184JA 124 . . -.. C S34 r s � San 3aq ,, vze 311 , .< ,' s.e net 33V i ` w -- �` '?lT •.. � 333, ♦ T ' {, bye e- '�, S'�3bt ""� I!' .. W.Wgy -ST I Arla 1' Figure 3. Proposed Project Layout F 7k a � Page 5 of 7 Feasibility Study South Harriet Park (West) Neighborhood Imp. No. A -204 January 26, 2005 Staff is continuing to analyze the utility repairs /replacements and will include the needed improvements with the final plans. Other utility activities usually include replacement of gas mains within the neighborhood, which is determined and coordinated by the local gas utility company. RIGHT -OF -WAY & EASEMENTS The right -of -way throughout the South Harriet Park (West) neighborhood is typically 60 feet wide. All proposed improvements stay within this right -of- way and no additional easement requirements are anticipated. FEASIBILITY: This project is feasible from an engineering and City standpoint. PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $808,000. The total cost includes indirect costs of 15% for engineering and clerical costs and 7.5% for first year finance costs. The estimated construction cost does not include storm sewer, watermain or utility improvements. Major watermain work is anticipated in this neighborhood; however, the final utility improvements will be determined during the final design and will be funded through the respective utility fund. Funding for the entire project will be from a combination of special assessment and utility funds. ASSESSMENTS: A special assessment of approximately $8,700 per residential equivalent unit or assessable lot will be levied against residents adjacent to the neighborhood's roadways. The justification for assessments is attributed to properties receiving benefit of the new pavement and the addition of concrete curb and gutter. The assessable lot is based on a detached single family home. Properties that abut the project and have access with their side or rear yards will be assessed 1/3 of the assessable unit cost (see Figure 4). The City will fund the portion of the project adjacent to Arden Park based on an equivalent 11 buildable lots for its roadway frontage and based on general public use of the roadway for access to Arden Park from Brookview Avenue. PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule is feasible from an Engineering standpoint: Council Orders Public Hearing .. .........................January 18, 2005 Receive Feasibility Report ............ ........................February 1, 2005 Public Hearing ............................ ........................February 15, 2005 Bid Opening ...... ............................... ..........................April 2005 Award Contract ... ............................... ............................May 2005 Begin Construction ................. ............................... .......May 2005 Complete Construction ......................... ........................October 2005 Page 6 of 7 Feasibility Study South Harriet Park (West) Neighborhood Imp. No. A -204 January 26, 2005 ATTACHMENTS: 5119 V - -- J' •.O•'t 5112 5113 512 5131 ''••'•••••• 5115 t j N Ln Project 5114 512 CV 4421 Boundary 5133 4 l 4 :14 5116 5117 512 52ND ST W Its •►• 5 5201 5201 5200 5 5209 5200 5213 5212 5211 5216 5217 5216 5217 5220 5221 5220 5221 5224 5230 5237 5224 5225 5228 N a Arden 5228 5232 h 4�; 1) Park 5241 5232 5233 5236 h \ r••••�• 5232 5245 5236 J 5237 1 5240 5241 5236 L — 53RD 3T W 5301 5300 5301 5300 5301 5300 5305 5304 5305 5304 5305 5304 5309 5308 5307 5308 5311 5308 5313 5312 5313 5318 5319 5312 u, a 5317 5316 'u 5325 5324 9! 5325 5316 3 5320 0 5331 5328 ; 5331 5320 LU 0 5325 5324 5337 5332 x 5337 5324 °o 3 5329 5328 Y 5341 5336 0 5343 5328 m 5333 ; 5349 5346 5351 53373 36• 5351 N5.3�48 5357 5336 54TH ST W Assessments 4500 5401 5400 5401 5400 with Curb & Gutter $2,900.00 $8,70000 Figure 4. Preliminary Assessment Map • Petition for Storm Sewer and Curb & Gutter along West 53rd Street • Information Meeting Attendance List and Comments • Survey Results and Comments • Project Comments and Letters Received • Preliminary Assessment Roll Page 7 of 7 0 00 0 REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # VI. A. From: Debra Mangen Consent ®. City Clerk Information Only Date: September 17, 2002 Mgr. Recommends To HRA ® To Council Subject: Receive petition Action P71 Motion Resolution Ordinance F-1 Discussion Recommendation Refer the petition received to Engineering for processing as to feasibility. Info/Background: The City received a petition circulated by Katherine Hardy requesting curb and gutter on 53rd Street between Wooddale and Brookview and a storm sewer at the corner of 53rd and Oaklawn. The petition contains nineteen signatures representing owners of eleven properties in the affected area. The City's normal procedure is to refer the petition to the Engineering Department for processing as to feasibility. c e City of Edina, Minnesota CITY COUNCIL •�� . 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 (612) 92741861 • (612) 927 - 7645 -FAX • (612) 927 - 5461 -TDD PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ❑ SIDEWALK STORM SEWER ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ SANITARY SEWER DATE: ' Q- 11 -02_ ❑ WATERMAIN ❑ STREET LIGHTING CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET ❑ OTHER: SURFACING WITH IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS. THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPER'T'IES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCEL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME SIGNATURE (PRINTED) his petition was circulated :mod PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S PHONE i I I 1. • r •_ D..M 1 a There is space for more signatures on the back.or you may attach extra pages. SEPTEWM,9W CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. . .Wo 3 e� �' R 2 Q 1 rr .. l. between �J 006 n and �d b, 1k -j W LOCATION OF 1MPROVFAU-NT BY STREET NAMZ ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMW -NT BY STREET NAM Z ADDRESS ADDRESS i fA �� ll1�Y C1Ci �' etween and - OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET Nkil ADDRESS, ADDRESS .)CATION between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMZNT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS. THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPER'T'IES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCEL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME SIGNATURE (PRINTED) his petition was circulated :mod PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S PHONE i I I 1. • r •_ D..M 1 a There is space for more signatures on the back.or you may attach extra pages. SEPTEWM,9W PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME SIGNATURE (PRINTED) PROPERTY ADDRESS 3�a / s3�1 I OWNER'S PHONE i IW I SIGN -IN SHEET SOUTH HARRIET PARK (WEST) IMPROVEMENT NO. A -204 INFORMATIONAL MEETING NOVEMBER 8. 2004 NAME ADDRESS ' �2 L d Ler ee- Avz_l so Z211? �5 z f� v a S�fr YUOkV��c.Jv2.. c 41 SL � n 3 AU s3 3r,,, ,�/ � v E e -23 2 1 e n n JAJ 1 J` QGi IC w n -P C -A/ a n ,-e S. oicz b zIQ k ✓E lL , + JiM aAtgk> o l ea 132o&vv i Ew -Ave -R aq,x,j 5� a QUESTION / COMMENT CARD Name E. - l6C-tC EA- Address es 04o V-L-",w"J PLEASE PRINT PLEASE PRINT QUESTION / COMMENT CARD 0 C)0 p L4 c r; ka6e d.vi i Ve WoL. � U A r An P N 5 c rr -e l c. C a r e C7 U t .i e w l ved 5 e o v, J floe d s -rHo Ne A.pp-cO F31 CXq if ?PftvvWWV iar Pt,cw o�L 154L;T Name JEFF YC22J'LLI6T" Address 53'4'b 0p4<L ftww PAO PLEASE PRINT PLEASE PRINT QUESTION / COMMENT CARD �, Address PLEASE PRINT PLEASE PRINT QUESTION / COMMENT CARD WMAP �2 Addres s `r3� Name L `� i'� PLEASE PRINT PLEASE PRINT -CJ/� QUESTION /COMMENT CARD 0--bis oT (so z MU le PA, k A-AA # A-4 L t �L k n� ��. U nF KO �,,..� b�_ lis�Ci� ?rte :nc +rl�SSiyP C ✓owniAc I), Namc TD Jcae9 Address 5.1] 1 ar oak u i e.J PLEASE MZNr PLEASE PRWr o QUESTION /-COMMENT CARDW -� C.fe Name -� Addressa L!n�/ u ': , PLEASE PRINT. PLEASE PRINT z ;� South Hari ark (West) Improvemr..L No. A -204 Survey Results NO STREET Returned Preferred Curb & Gutter Utility Relocate Decorative Street Lights COMMENTS Survey Yes No B -HEAD S -MOUNT Yes No Yes No Style Colonial Acorn Traditional 4421 52ND ST W X X* X X X 2 3 1 *1 love the look of the n'hood without gutters. 4425 52ND ST W 4429 52ND ST W X X X X X 3 1 2 4431 52ND ST W 5224 BROOKVIEW AVE X X X X 1 5228 BROOKVIEW AVE X X X X X 1 1 3 2 5232 BROOKVIEW AVE X X X X X 1 2 3 5236 BROOKVIEW AVE X X X X* X 1 *Depends on cost. 5300 BROOKVIEW AVE X X X X X 2 3 1 5304 BROOKVIEW AVE X X X X X 5308 BROOKVIEW AVE X X X X X 3 2 1 Please consider widening the street near the park entrance as many cars park along that side of the road (especially in winter) making backing out of our driveway very tricky and sometims almost imposible. This widened area could then safely be used for curbside parking. 5312 BROOKVIEW AVE X X X X X 1 5316 BROOKVIEW AVE X X X X X 3 1 2 5320 BROOKVIEW AVE X X X X X 1 5324 BROOKVIEW AVE X X X X 5328 BROOKVIEW AVE 5336 BROOKVIEW AVE X X X X X 2 3 1 5200 KELLOGG AVE X X X X X 1 5201 KELLOGG AVE X X X X X 1 3 2 5211 KELLOGG AVE X X. X X ** X * ** 2 3 1 *It would ruin the character of our n'hood; * *Would be expensive and trenching would damage shrubs and tree roots. ** *Why, in this time of attempting to conserve electricity would we add street lights? Letter attached. 5212 KELLOGG AVE X X X X 5216 KELLOGG AVE X X X X Letter attached. 5217 KELLOGG AVE X X X X Your #s are unconscionable - we should pay for the park - indeed! 5220 KELLOGG AVE X X X X X 1 5221 KELLOGG AVE X X* X X ** *It makes no sense to rank these when I'm not in favor of C &G; * *I see no reason to change the style we have. Letter attached. 5224 KELLOGG AVE X X X X* But no mid -block lighting. Grade strees (and add drains) to move water where it needs to go. 52251 KELLOGG AVE X X X X X 2 3 1 5228 KELLOGG AVE South Harriet Park (West) Improvement No. A -204 Survey Results NO STREET Returned Preferred Curb & Gutter Utility Relocate Decorative Street Lights COMMENTS Survey Yes No B -HEAD S -MOUNT Yes No Yes No Style Colonial Acorn Traditional 5232 KELLOGG AVE X X X X X* X 3 1 2 *Must know cost before approval. 5233 KELLOGG AVE X X X X X 2 1 3 5236 KELLOGG AVE 5237 KELLOGG AVE 5300 KELLOGG AVE 5301 KELLOGG AVE X X X X X 1 3 2 5304 KELLOGG AVE X X X X X 1 3 2 5305 KELLOGG AVE X X X X X 1 5307 KELLOGG AVE 5308 KELLOGG AVE X X X X 5312 KELLOGG AVE X X. X X ** X *1 constantly have water in front of my house.I am a vocal supporter of gutters. I would take either of these. * *If the city/utility co. chooses to. do not wish to pay for this. Is the cost of the stree work/gutters /light, etc. higher than the work done on Maple? Why? What will I be paying for the new street? Since our property taxes pay for street repairs, have the streets been re aired? 5313 KELLOGG AVE 5316 KELLOGG AVE X X X X X 1 5320 KELLOGG'AVE 5324 KELLOGG AVE X X X X 3 5325 KELLOGG AVE X X X X X 1 5328 KELLOGG AVE X X X X X 2 3 1 .5331 KELLOGG AVE X X X X X 5336 KELLOGG AVE X X X* X ** X 2 3 1 *Would curbs end at 54th or wrap, around? * *Would like to see a detailed cost estimate first. 5337 KELLOGG AVE X X X X X 1 3 2 5341 KELLOGG AVE X X X X X 1 5349 KELLOGG AVE X X X X X 1 5351 KELLOGG AVE 5200 OAKLAWN AVE 5216 OAKLAWN AVE X X* X X X *But not at the expense of removing trees! 5220 OAKLAWN AVE X X X X X 2 3 1 5224 OAKLAWN AVE X X X X X 1 5227 OAKLAWN AVE X X X X X 2 3 1 5228 OAKLAWN AVE 5232 OAKLAWN AVE X X* X X 2 3 1 *There are many of us that want to retain the charm of our n'hood. 5236 OAKLAWN AVE X X X X 5240 OAKL - -'`I AVE X X X X X 1 South Harr! A (West) Improvemem No. A -204 Survey Results NO STREET Returned Preferred Curb & Gutter Utility Relocate Decorative Street Lights COMMENTS Survey Yes No 13-HEAD S -MOUNT Yes No Yes No Style Colonial Acorn Traditional 5241 OAKLAWN AVE X X X X X 3 1 2 Comments on back side of survey. 5300 OAKLAWN AVE X X X' X X" 1 'On 53rd only; "Make sure they are along Brookview from 52nd to 54th, we would be ok to be assessed. More written on backside of survey. 5304 OAKLAWN AVE 5308 OAKLAWN AVE 5318 OAKLAWN AVE 5324 OAKLAWN AVE X X X X X 1 5328 OAKLAWN AVE X X X X X 1 3 2 5332 OAKLAWN AVE X X' X X" X' 1 'Depending on final assessment; "More than likely cost prohibitive. .5336 OAKLAWN AVE X X X X X 1 5346 OAKLAWN AVE X X X' X" X 2 1 3 'Only if road can be >26' due to oak trees; "Already buried; questions attached w /survey. 5348 OAKLAWN AVE X X X X X 2 3 1 See back of survey for comments. 5301 OAKLAWN AVE X X X X X 1 3 2 5305 OAKLAWN AVE X X X X X 1 5311 OAKLAWN AVE X X X X 5319 OAKLAWN AVE X X' X X X 1 Gutter would be acceptable only if we don't lose our oak at boulevard. 5325 OAKLAWN AVE 5331 OAKLAWN AVE X X X X X 2 1 3 Letter attached. 5337 OAKLAWN AVE X X. X X X 1 '1 strongly object to being charged for guttes around Arden Park; concerned about potential damage to many trees that are close to the street; proper street grading should provide adequate drainage and eliminate the need for C &G. 5343 OAKLAWN AVE X X X X 5351 IOAKLAWN AVE X X X X 5357 OAKLAWN AVE X X X' X X 1 'As long as street is no wider and there is no loss of trees next to street. Narrow is better. 5133 WOODDALE AVE X X X X 5245 WOODDALE AVE X X X X X 1 5301 WOODDALE AVE X X X X X 1 3 2 5201 IWOODDALE AVE X X X X X South Harriet Park (West) Improvement No. A -204 Survey Results MET-Imm- FM- MT-m- Decorative Street Lights Prefer Curb & Gutter Utilities Relocated to Underground Prefer Decorative ��0��0�m Of AOooe� ..,A �-, "&,Z+ 0/0 • DAN STARKEY 5331 OAKLAWN AVENUE SOUTH EDINA, NIN 55424 TEL 9.52.920 -5400 danstarkeye-aoLcont DATE: December 2, 2004 TO: Steven Lillehaug - Edina Traffic Engineer FROM: Dan Starkey RE: South Harriet Park (West) Resident Survey - Comment Sheet c: Members of the Edina City Council We received your Resident. Survey in the mail this past week, and our family's response to your survey is enclosed. There was no Comment Sheet enclosed with the survey as described in your cover letter - and so this letter has been prepared for your review. An observation: your `survey' left a great deal to be desired. It's assumptive in nature, and makes it pretty clear that decisions have already been made that affect our neighborhood without any kind of quorum. Nevertheless, this letter outlines the views of my family as well as quite a few of my neighbors with whom we've been talking. 1. In view of the fact that the original petition was created exclusively by and for the residents of 53rd Street - due to their standing water / drainage problems on the corners - the inclusion of the rest of the neighborhood into the plans for curb and gutter is quite a bit of overkill, it seems to me. On the other hand, we have all uniformly complained about the state of the street repair - or,lack thereof- for several years, and so having new streets is a good thing, overall. That is, considering the increasing annual cost (read: amazingly high property taxes) to live in our Edina neighborhood, the condition of our streets is deplorable. Consequently, creating a curb and gutter system for those residents on 53rd who may require such a system is perfectly within reason. And, of course, the costs should be borne by those who have actually requested such an improvement. By the way, all those petitioning residents on 53rd have automatic in- ground lawn watering systems which may exacerbate the standing water problems on the comers. 2. The `need' for curbs and gutters elsewhere in the neighborhood has not been clearly shown. It's apparent that the life of the existing street without the curbs and gutters has been overlong. But that length of time is long, indeed. These streets are well over 60 years old, and repairs in recent years have been scant to nonexistent. `Saving the street' by installing curbs and gutters, as you pointed out during the first meeting a few weeks ago, is not really apparent. Bottom line: we like our neighborhood the way it is - with particular attention to the trees. Cutting mature tree roots to install something that not everyone wants is a risky business, and taking responsibility for killing trees must rest with the city. Cl 3. New and decorative street lights seems like a nice touch. But again, you've gone too far. No one has asked for, nor does anyone desire the complete revamping of the lighting system to include mid -block lights. A goodly number of households in the neighborhood already have in -yard lighting, or leave porch lights on overnight, continuing the idea of `our' neighborhood. Safety issues at work here? Heck, it's too bright, already. 4. The inclusion of that portion of Arden Park that borders the neighborhood is another bit of `going too far.' It's a park. Does it need curb and gutter? Of course not. Would there be benefit in creating a better drainage system than the one now in place? Probably. But the bulkhead curb and gutter system that you proposed as `favorable' throughout the area is not only ugly, but would visually turn our neighborhood into a kind of south Minneapolis. No thank you. 5. Finally, a series of notes, letters, emails have been exchanged and informal in- street meetings have been going on since this sequence began. You have a neighborhood that is uniformly unhappy with the way this is being handled, whether or not they're in favor of the proposed work. The topics of conversation range from comparing the extremely high assessment for our neighborhood with others in the area who have had similar work at half the cost, the likelihood of killing our beautiful trees, the `automatic' widening of the streets to correspond with incoming federal monies, the uniformity of assessment fees without regard for actual frontage, and the prospect of making the whole area look like a computer - generated grid of streets that is straight and true as an Iowa cornfield. Not good. Not good at all. I'm sure we are all aware of the workload that you and the Council must be under. It's no picnic, I'd imagine. On the other hand, as residents we care about our city and our neighborhoods as much as we care about our own households. Giving thought to our personal quality of life is as important as anything we do. Make no mistake, our neighborhood is part of that importance. Kindly give this situation more than a casual thought, as you so obviously have not done with this kind of all-or- nothing offering. I imagine that if you provide the residents here with a menu of alternatives rather than the yes -or -no proposition we now have in front of us, you will not only get a better feeling for our collective opinions, you'll engender an amount of respect that you do not now have as leaders of our community. An example. the lack of a Comment Sheet with the survey seemed purposeful and part of the `assumed -sale' that surrounds this project. To be honest, the last thing we'd hike to do is to create a legal- status neighborhood association just to have some control over situations like this. But it's been talked about... C��3? Nary Lee Whiting 5221 lie 11 ogg Ave. Edina, Mn. 55424 December 4, 2004 To: Steve Li l lehaug and al l members of the Edina City Counc! 1 Re.: Proposed street Improvements I am very opposed to curbs and gutters being installed in this neighborhood, The lack of curbs and gutters adds to the charm of the area. I wouldn't want them if there were no assessmentll The proposed assessment is outrageous - - -and then the same amount no matter what the size of the lot? This makes no sense. The lighting and utility lines we have now are just fine. Nothing is needed, g different I believe the minimum should be done to keep the streets in good repair and safe. Please see that each member of the city count! 1 receives a COPY y of this Sincerely, 4 Nary Cee Whiting E. Daniel Eckberg 5211 Kellogg Avenue Edina, Minnesota 55424 ("2) MW6 Fa= (%2) 9"-S&M FMFA&erV@wLeom December 1, 2004 Mr. Steven Lillehaug Edina Traffic Engineer City Halll 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Dear Mr. Lillehaug, I have received your Resident Survey regarding "Improvement" A -204. I have completed it as requested and it is enclosed. I have placed the word "Improvement" in quotes, as there are many of us who believe that the proposed projects are not likely to improve our neighborhood. In fact, they would destroy the unique character of our area Let me explain by discussing each project. Many of us purchased homes in this area because the comfortable "rural -type" streets run right up to the lawns. Adding gutters (with or without curbs) would greatly change the ambience of our street. Long stretches of white concrete on both sides of the street would not be an attractive amenity. We do not require more "definition" of the yard/roadway; and our traffic control is just fine, thank you. In addition,KeHogg is known for its trees. Adding gutters would require removal of some of our most stately trees. I have a large oak (probably over a hundred years old) at the southern edge of my lot which is right at the street, as do my neighhbors to the north, and my neighbors across the street. Cutting down three huge oaks within 100 feet of each other would severely damage our block and our resale value. In this day of ecological awareness, such an act would be a travesty. Relocating overhead utility lines underground would be, as you suggest, expensive. Trenching would also require damaging. our shrubs and tree roots. It is one thing to trench in utility lines in a newly developing neighborhood with open fields. Doing so in our developed area would be damaging to our property. Though this is perhaps the least offensive project, there doesn't appear to be any need to increase street lighting. In fact, it is rather pleasant to go out at night and see the stars mid -block without night light pollution. Also, we do not have a crime problem nor any gangs hanging out mid - block. So why, in this time of attempting to conserve electricity, would we Wd street lights? For the above reasons, I respectfully request that you do not proceed with these projects. If there is a real need to reconstruct storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water mains, then so be it. But then put the street back the way it is, without unsightly curbs and gutters. I once lived in Minneapolis with curbs and gutters and sidewalks. I moved to Kellogg to get away from that. Please don't ruin the character of my neighborhood. I trust that you have other projects on which you could use the money. We do too. S' yo , lE Enclosure CC: Edina City Council Kellogg neighbors _3 • �1 Es -A2�, r- �7�,i$ � � C-A P c C � GoS0, z) � W A— 6���� Ca���S ���6� 2�.a�tJ�c7�s�M►b� Q SS(Z-SS/"'�F�'� jIl (� Pd �L� � w�l � Ud (�t-,� � r�-i. � �4 c�42� � Grp �(r P�SC� �S ��- v�•�C- ; VC,�j c\ (610h T V' � J /wrc �kn:c��LCC�, arc Gu ��„ s ���i.✓ 7 ad Att LZIA 40 lot, 4e /;O�5 ✓iurt� °� �%�`, 7W4 �2- Bii�780S��0� saco oakln��^ (1) C,4&) Tt+t5 ,>o �+c) N rtr-42o uv &`P-- TT-MW 774L5- 2(� C;ooe IF- 0S' GA)t-y t4LLo W ED 61,J ONe 5/D& OF T4ff 5�E'7 ? T(�f I S w a U LD ?� 6- M o o P— LSD f:W ff IPJ C o cn N TiZy . C L U (s T)t� Nt ��t-FBofZr+ooA 1+�s IY7/+N% lbo lZ: OC,D GAPC W )7 -HIIJ fOr I'ooT ot= Thus- gcgo eD6�, 77,19/ w L 8 Df f+ ?7 1 C c1 QS 5 PLCF I AJ �2r 61f� N��T Tp "T�-t�1►'�, w �oN7 Lam/ -�e�1i --f-0 [.aoSE. TffeM. MO S'T Qv f1'=H 5aRS P-o P(p SU 2FPKe To T-4 E TRESS 14 5 w P 5 KCIET "TIJ6 Q U A I ti L0 0f< 0T TN E N F1(tASo-;?- tfo oD, I' GU2j35 c,vrr"t-92 s I dj sTpru-uDI C ��tV�wpry pp�jtiJ I� IT D - TtT-2-4oRPr -T-�s or,- 15 (b V P -Rf'*N T e-ju-- �'d OF Wt-' lcli u)(LL isc- FZ�movLn l�u t-1 c S o I..� �- ��6 c�S�M;» `� �o l-t � �H- �o w► � rz wVE N T - T►�fZO UCo - tY Trhs i�ROG�55 . i 1 6" f1fil vlosT November 30, 2004 Steven Lillehaug Traffic Engineer City of Edina Dear Mr. Lillehaug: This is in reply to your letter dated 11/24/04 regarding the Resident Survey. Your cover letter is misleading because it does not inform residents that the estimated residential assessment for street reconstruction is $11,700.00. I suggest you amend your letter and inform all residents who are involved wbg the estimated costs are regarding street construction. Gutters, lights, anOuried utilities are in addition to this cost estimate. Those who were not in attendancm at . original meeting need to know all the costs in order to make a decision. Finally, how can w vote regarding relocating utility lines if you don't know the estimated cost per residence? Sincerely, f47 Lo . tera AIr I(, K From: Wayne Houle Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 8:29 AM To: Steve Lillehaug Subject: FW: Roadway Improvements -City of Edina Improvement No. A -204 for the file - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Gordon Hughes Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 10:23 AM To: Darlene Wallin; Wayne Houle Subject: FW: Roadway Improvements -City of Edina Improvement No. A -204 For next packet. -- - -- Original Message---- - From: Fullmer, John D. [ mailto :jfullmer @larkinhoffman.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 10:24 AM To: Gordon Hughes Subject: FW: Roadway Improvements -City of Edina Improvement No. A -204 -- -Original Message — From: Fullmer, John D. Send Wednesday, December 22, 2004 9:37 AM To: 'ghughes@d.edina.mn.usa' Subject: Roadway Improvements-aty of Edina Improvement No. A -204 I am writing to let you know that I strongly support the proposed roadway improvements proposed for my neighborhood (53rd and Kellogg), especially the street reconstruction and curb and gutter portions of the proposal. These improvements are greatly needed to improve drainage and provide yard protection (through curbs). Although some in my neighborhood oppose these improvements, I'm sure the City will act in the long -term best interests of the neighborhood and the city. Please forward this message to the appropriate City officials. If you or anyone else have any questions, please fell free to contact me. Thank you for your assistance. file: / /GAhnprovements\A204 South Harriet Park West \Doc \e - mai1\1- 5- 05_john fullmer a -m... 1/7/2005 f- December 13, 2004 Dear Neighbor, When you receive this letter there will have been a meeting Monday evening to discuss concerts relating to the proposed neighborhood improvements. I'm happy to see many of you have already taken a proactive position and have shared some important points. It is my intent to attend tonight's meeting, however, in the event either of us are unable to attend, I would like to share my thoughts, both from the prospective of a homeowner and an area Realtor. First, and perhaps of greatest significance, is the notion that "our neighborhood only" benefits from Arden Park and should therefore assume responsibility for the considerable road frontage contiguous to the park Arden Park is perhaps the busiest practice/game venue for hockey in East Edina, one of only a couple canoe portage locations in the community (a system that runs from Lake Minnetonka to the Mississippi), and the sole "pedestrian only" creek crossing in the City. Second, is the disparity in cost between the recent White Oaks (Maple Road) project and the proposal for our neighborhood? Irrespective of the absence of a park contribution, there is no inflation model relative to this type of work that would explain the cost, particularly since the Maple Road project also included sidewalk and lighting at a number approximately 40% lower than our proposal without those items. Third, are the two premises that the neighborhood is flat and therefore doesn't naturally drain well and that curbing insures extended useful life; even though our streets lasted nearly 60 years prior to entering a cycle of exacerbated engineering problems brought on by age, neglect, and absence of maintenance. I would suggest you all observe 52°d Street at Kellogg as well as 53"d Street at Kellogg and at Oaklawn. You should note (a topographical survey should confirm) that there is significant grade slope to Wooddale and to the creek. You should also note there is severe crowning of the roads throughout the neighborhood, but particularly at these points, and it is that which is responsible for much of the pooling and erosion. I believe that curbing without addressing the negative grade issues will have no beneficial affect, where resurfacing while correcting grade problems will probably correct drainage in and of it. In the event that it is determined that some curbing is necessary to mitigate drainage problems, I do not see a situation that would justify the need for curbs other than at select corners. I also believe that, should that prove to be the case, it is a cost that should be born by the entire neighborhood, as the navigability and safety of the immediate area roads benefit us all. Fourth, there are no parts of the neighborhood that appear to have limitations for emergency vehicles, nor does the neighborhood have the abundance of single garages and single track driveways that contribute to excessive road parked vehicles, and the neighborhood does not provide logical thru traffic to anywhere. These would be the types of situations that might cause someone to consider the onerous costs and aesthetics of removing boulevard trees and widening roads. It should be noted _that most of the existing roads are wider than the existing roads in Country Club yet experience a fraction of the traffic. Fifth and finally, are a serious of more opinionated thoughts that in some cases are more of a departure from the salient points and more a series of thoughts based on professional experience or just going off on a rant. I don't want curbs (other than selectively where proven absolutely necessary), I think that a vintage home neighborhood without them speaks to a somewhat small town charm and differentiates the neighborhood from others nearby. I do believe that the addition of an architectural light goes a long way towards identifying the neighborhood as classic and vintage (not just old) and suspect that there would be a property value increase to go along with the benefit of a more "human" scale lighting. I think the benefit of fewer power outages and not having Asplund butcher the trees would be nice, however, not enough to support the costs associated with burying the utilities. Hid the city of Edina become a `B" or "C" credit borrower? Where do we get in line to buy "muni" bonds at 6.5 0/o? Have we been getting our fair share of city road maintenance funds in recent years or have we been a fore gone conclusion? Is it just I, or did the city exude a decidedly- poor level of preparedness, absence of data, and perhaps a casual less than responsible approach to spending "other peoples' money" at their first meeting? How does having serviceable roads (that I paid for) make my property values go up 3 0/o? Tread carefully on discussions. relating to the assessed value questions, as we are for the most part under assessed when compared to other parts of Edina. If you have questions, thoughts or information, feel free to can at 612 - 867 -0367 or e-mail to Tom@tomjonesteam.com & Trish - 5224 Brookview Avenue From: Steve Lillehaug Sent: Wednesday, December To: 'Jon Hammar' Cc: Steve Lillehaug Subject: RE: City of Edina Good morning Jon. 15, 2004 9:08 AM Improvement No. A -204 Thank you for your comments. They will be forwarded to the Council for consideration. Steven L. Lillehaug, P.E., P.T.O.E. Edina Traffic Engineer /Assistant Engineer Engineering Department 952 -826 -0445 slillehaug @ci.edina.mn.us City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com (fax) 952 -826 -0389 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Jon Hammar [mailto:jon.hammar®willis.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 3:35 PM To: Steve Lillehaug Cc: Alyssa Hammar Subject: City of Edina Improvement No. A -204 Steven, I just wanted to drop you a note to tell you that you are doing a great job with the planning and execution on the street improvement project for W. 52nd, 53rd, Kellogg, Oaklawn and Brookview. I realize that you have received some negative correspondence from others in the neighborhood, as they printed copies of their e-mail to you and hand delivered them to all affected homeowners. By reading some of this correspondence, you might get the impression that everyone is against curbs and gutters. This could not be further from the truth. I have yet to speak with anyone on our block that is opposed to curbs and gutters. We all recognize the value in terms of appreciation in property values, enhanced aesthetics and protection to our lawn /landscaping. Considering the fact that the roadway will be replaced regardless of the curb /gutter issue, it is shortsighted to eliminate a feature that is projected to be only 20% of the total assessment. This is literally a once in a lifetime opportunity to get the job done right. Please do not be deterred, you have our full support. I look forward to moving on with this project. -Jon Ps. Please feel free to share my correspondence with the City Counsel or others interested in seeing this project succeed. Jon R. Hammar 5349 Kellogg Ave. S. Edina, MN 55424 (952) 929 -2277 t a5v a va i Steve Lillehaug From: Wayne Houle Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 2:06 PM To: 'Bob Shutes' Cc: vaurio0l @tc.umn.edu; Steve Lillehaug Subject: RE: City of Edina, Improvement No. A -204 Bob: Sorry for the delayed response. The current assessment practice for neighborhood reconstruction projects is based on a "Residential Equivalent Unit" (REU); meaning all all properties are treated equal. That is except for properties that have side or rear yards adjacent to the project which are assessed at 1/3 the REU. Please let me know if our City staff misinformed you of the assessment policy. Thanks Wayne Houle„ PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 whoule@ci.edina.mn.us 952 - 826 -0443 direct 952 - 826 -0390 fax - - -- -Original Message---- - From: Bob Shutes [mailto:rlshutes @mn.rr.com] Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004 10:15 AM To: Wayne Houle Cc: vaurio0l @tc.umn.edu Subject: City of Edina, Improvement No. A -204 Wayne: There is confusion as to how the assessments will be determined. At the informational meeting we were informed they would be, in most cases, an equal dollar amount per homestead. We have since been advised that the assessment will be based on the linear footage each homestead has on the street. Please clarify this for me and I will pass the information on. THANK YOU. Bob Shutes 12/10/2004 Elena Brito Sifferlin 5332 Oaklawn Avenue - Edina, Minnesota 55424.952/926 -2111 December 8, 2004 City Councilmen/women City of Edina City Hall 4801 West 50' Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 RE: South Harriet Park Street Improvement Project No. A -204 Dear City Councilmen/women: My husband Mark and I want to express our concern regarding the proposed street improvement project for our neighborhood South Harriet Park We agree that our streets need to be replaced and see the benefit of having curbs, gutters and increased lighting. Our concern is with the cost per resident that will be assessed. We attended the meeting on November 8, 2004 where Steven Lillehaug outlined the project and the estimated assessment. I later spoke to him over the phone for more details regarding how the assessment was calculated The estimated assessment per resident is: $11,700 (including curbs and gutters) plus $1,300 for lighting; total estimate of $13,000. Less than two years ago a similar project was completed in an area of Edina near ours, on Maple Road. It is my understanding that the per resident assessment was approximately $8,000. Their project entailed curbs, gutters, lighting and sidewalks, which included more than our proposed project This is an alarming difference and we are having difficulty understanding why ours is so much higher. A gentleman at the November a meeting asked if the residents were being assessed for the portion of the project that runs the perimeter of Arden Park which covers approximately 3 blocks. His question was not answered but when I spoke to Steven he thought that it was included in the resident assessment We feel that the City (via resident taxes) should take on the burden of park curbs, gutters and lighting and not the residents directly. Although my husband and I fully support a needed street improvement project in our neighborhood, the current assessment projection is too cost prohibitive for us. Sincerely, cc: Steven L. Lillehaug, P.E., P.T.O.E., Edina Traffic Engineer /Assistant Engineer Elspeth Nairn and Letitia Mar 5320 Brookview Ave. Edina, MN, 55424 (952)920.3134 12/7/04 Re: City of Edina Improvement No. A -204 To: Wayne Houle, Steven Lillehaug Edina City Council: We have lived in this neighborhood for 8 years and appreciate the natural beauty we have here next to the creek. Our neighbor to the north has lived here since 1942, built the home she lives in, and her parents built the house we now live in. Our neighbors to the south have lived here since the 70's and the neighbor beyond them grew up in that same house. There is history here. There is community here. There is nature here. We agree that something does need to be done about the condition of the street It has been deteriorating for the past few years. Some of the patches have been less than adequate. However, there is no need to change the fundamental feeling of this neighborhood. Curbs and gutters are an urban intrusion. They also do not allow for the natural cleaning of the runoff` water before it enters the creek. The creek is the lifeblood of this and many downstream communities, not to mention the communities of wild birds, fish and mammals who depend on it We have an idyllic spot here. One that is walking distance to shops and the grocery store, minutes from downtown Minneapolis, and is also abundant with wild life and nature. Often we push aside our 'wild' neighbors to make so called improvements to our lives, only to find that our lives are greatly diminished when they are gone. We know that many in the neighborhood are upset about your proposals. Many do not want curbs for aesthetic reasons, some for the loss of trees, and some from the shear shock of the estimated cost All are valid reasons. We can imagine there are even some folks who would consider moving rather than incur such a debt We would ask that you reconsider the options for this neighborhood. We do not need curbs and gutters. Replacing the existing roadways and regrading them to better accommodate the runoff should be sufficient Alternative lighting is unnecessary and costly. For some in this neighborhood the utilities are not under the roadway, so upgrading them at this time would be moot (Gas and water are under our street; sewer, electric, phone, cable are for the most part between the houses in back). Some people have already buried their "overhead" utilities, for others it would be a prohibitive cost We appreciate your consideration of our concerns. Sincerely, Elspeth Nairn Letiti a Zilar r Page 1 of 2 From: Wayne Houle Sent: Friday, December 03, 200411:01 AM To: 'Bob Shutes' Cc: Steve Lillehaug Subject: RE: City of Edina Improvement No. A -204 Bob: Thank you for your comments. Your comments and issues will be addressed and included in the referenced project's feasibility study and presented to the Council for consideration. Wayne Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 whoule@ci.edina.mn.us 952- 826 -0443 direct 952 - 826 -0390 fax - - -- -Original Message---- - From: Bob Shutes [mailto:rlshutes @mn.rr.com] Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 6:00 PM To: Wayne Houle Cc: shshutes @mn.rr.com Subject: City of Edina Improvement No. A -204 Dear Mr. Houle: I attended the informational meeting on November 8th and have reviewed the Petition to the City Council dated September 11, 2002. Based upon the information provided to us thus far, my wife and I cannot support the proposal. We would like to make the following points: 1. You stated at the meeting that this project has been initiated by residents of the neighborhood. This seems to be a stretch. The petition is dated over 2 years ago and requests only a "storm sewer - comer 53rd and Oaklawn". 2. The petition was signed by a very small number of the people you now propose to assess under your proposal. Some of the people who signed the petition had no idea what the assessment would be and do not, now, support your proposal 3. My wife and I will not support any proposal that includes curbs and gutters. The curbs and gutters will only detract from the beauty of our neighborhood. 4. The proposed curbs and gutters will result in the loss of many trees which are on the street line. The curbs and gutters would also change the look of or destroy the stone walls my neighbors and we have at the street line. 5. Your proposal is much more expensive, for some reason, than the project on Maple Road. 6. Your proposal to charge 6.4% interest on any outstanding balance of the assessed costs is unreasonable. It does not cost the City of Edina anything close to that to borrow money. We don't believe this project should be a fund raiser for the City of Edina. Please acknowledge receipt of this e-mail. Sincerely, Robert L. Shutes 5I;zI�, ��Jao file: / /G:\Improvements\A204 South Harriet Park West\Doc \e- mail \12-9-04—e-mail—bob sh... 12/9/2004 ji, Su b ,a c.Q�. , Winn, . -...4,00 . i�JkA,� a, /� Amp CLIO Ca) --� • p aildyk CA lei ir, - ��, coo, 0 0 I , YaAJ- - r_�bu� , . - - - -,b - V e� J � City of Edina December 14, 2004 Jane W. Fuegner 5225 Kellogg Avenue Edina, Minnesota 55424 RE: South Harriet Park (West) Area Improvements City of Edina, Improvement No. A -204 Dear Mrs. Fuegner: Thank you for your letter (dated December 2, 2004) addressing the referenced project and survey /comment sheet. Your comments were received by the Mayor and Council. The following is a response to several questions and comments that you indicated. We will be sending an updated information sheet to you and your neighbors regarding the project with a summary of the costs and results of the recent survey. Residents are encouraged to further comment on this updated information. All comments will be forwarded to the Council for consideration. Additionally, since the Information Meeting, we have revised and included the Arden Park street frontage (City Park Property) into the assessment computation as equivalent residential units. The City will pay for this portion of the project, which reduces the individual assessment amount. The project's feasibility study is tentatively scheduled for presentation to the Council in January 2005, along with the Public Hearing. Notice of the Public Hearing will be given to. you at least 10 days in advance:- Please contact us witIf any further-questioris or comments. Sincerely, Ste„ / • /d""47 Steven L. Lillehaug, P.E., P.T.O.E. Edina Traffic Engineer / Assistant Engineer c: Mayor Council Members City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 5225 Kellogg Avenue, Edina, Minnesota 55424 December~ 2, 2004 Memo: To the mayor and members of the Edina City Council Re: The South Harriet Park (West) Improvement No. A -204 On November 8 I attended the informational meeting and heard some details of-the proposal. At that time, residents were promised a communication about each part of the project, related cost esti- mates, and the opportunity to express our preferences via survey. On Nov. 20we received the enclosed survey, which .I find inadequate for the following reasons: 1.) No option was even presented about wether or not we want our streets reconstructed. 2.) No cost was given for such a major road and sewer assessment, even if it were deemed desireable. 3.) Man* of the people who could not attend the meeting assumed from the survey that the curb8- .gutter choice' included the cost of the road surface and Xnfrastructure.' Thy were not informed that it would cost approximately $9,400 for that alone, before any add -0ns for the curbs/guttersr lights, and underground utilities. In essence$, we were not able to make a full, informed, and valid choices. Another part of the plan(againr unknown to those not presentj dealt with the fact that we would be absorbing costs fbiq the 'Arden Park Parkway repairs and, alsor these for th®•-walls-r bolders and landscaping that residents have constructed 'oh' the' blt ''s right - of- way. I would contend (hopefullyr without eing con entious) that those two areas should not be funded by assessments to all of us but by the city (Park Dept. ?) in the first instance and by the city and /or the private property owners in the second. Thank you for your consideration of these'ttemsr l i� November 21, 2004 The Honorable Dennis F. Maetzold, Mayor Scot A. Housh, Councilman James B. Hovland, Councilman Michael F. Kelly, Councilman Linda M. Masica, Councilwoman City of Edina 4801 West 50'6 Street Edina, MN. 55424 -1394 Subject Proposed Improvement No. A -204 (Attached) Dear Mayor and City Council members: This letter is to express my opinion and concerns regarding the proposed improvement subject as above. I reside at 5216 Kellogg Ave. S. I have lived in Edina for 16 years. My experience with the services in Edina has been very positive and this is the first time I have expressed my oanoerns regarding any proposed `ym %NOI%FeIneIIJ&-. Background: Wayne Houle and Steve LIllehaug informed us at the November 8, 2004 informational meeting that 12 property owners petitioned the City Council on September 11, 2002 regmAing improvements to their streets because of water drainage problems. They requested a storm sewer on the corner of 5P & Oaldawn and curb and gutters between Wooddele and Brookview on 53rd Street. Instead of addressing the problem with the residents who signed the petition in 2002, the project as proposed by the City Planner, was expanded to include 85 residences to be completed in 2005. I was not contacted to sign the petition. The roadway in finnt of my property is adequate and with the addition of a new storm drain in 2003, rainwater drains properly into the sewer system. I am very satisfied with the roadway and water drainage. It seems to me the project No. A-204, as proposed, has taken on a life of its own primarily because the City Planner now has a catalyst to not only upgrade the street suit' aces in an expanded area, but also to update all residence's water and gas entrance facilities; replace waste sewer pipes; berry cable television and telephone entrance facilities (optionally), add curbs, and street lights (optional). The entire area would be under construction fi+om ApriWctober 2005 at an estimated cost of $962, 000.00. This equates to be $11, 700.00 per equivalent residential unit (ERU). As the Mayor and a member of the City Council, I hope you would listen and respond to my concerns prior to making a decision. You should either (1) respond to the petitioners on 53rd Street and offer them a solution to their problem and not involve the other residences or.(2) if you involve the additional 73 residences, please be prepared to explain why the Planning department's Proposal is the winning Proposal. Be prepared to explain the total costs of the project and why alternative proposals, which include lower costs, could not be considered. I object to the proposal A-204 because the City Planners have expanded the original request and it does not benefit the majority of households. If you choose to respond to those petitioners on 5P Street, the remainder of this letter is moot. If you plan to involve the other 73 residences, then I have some suggestions for consideration and request an explanation at the public hearing on December 7, 2004 as to wby the project was expanded at an estimated price of $17,800.00 per ERU. Role of Edina City Govemmeat: The role of City government, among other things, is to collect taxes and provide for the common good of its citizens, to include police, fire, schools, roads and utility infiastrucdme. It seems to me that government has an obligation to repair my street, provide storm sewers, effective water drainage and pay for it out of our property and state gasoline taxes. In 16 years, only-one street project has occurred on my street and that was to replace storm drains between 52nd and 53rd Streets on Kellogg Avenue in 2003. In fad, Kellogg Ave. is not a "dirough sheet" because it is blocked to the north by 52nd Street, which parallels Minnehaha Creek and therefore is not a very busy thoroughfare except for residents, delivery vehicles, and school busses. Tie roadway surface should have a longer useful life than average because it has minimal traffic. Tie problem, it seems to me, is these are not enough storm drains especially on the corners where water collects. There are drains in the middle of our block and when they were replaced in 2003, the water drains properly into the storm. sewers.. Tie following are some questions for consideration: 1. Does the city budget a certain amount for annual sMaet maintenance from our tares? 2. How are monies appropriated to r+epair/upgrade the streets and storm sewers? 3. How much money is the City expending for this project? Why not address the problem and not enlarge the project to include other resit? My position is that the City of Edina, if it plans to move ahead with the project, should bear some equivalent amount of tax money because it has an obligation to provide upkeep for streets, lighting and sewers. It seems ironic that money is available for a City Hall, Police and Fme equipment, schools, playgrounds, athletic fields and gymnasia etc. What about spending money on our roadway and attendant All citizens use the roadways and utilities, but not all use the schools and athletic fields. Some roads are repaired (Woodale between Valley View and 50m St mb in 2004) and other projects involve an assessment. Please explain your Ong authority at the meeting and how other similar projects were funded. Eanivalent ReddenW Unit "a Each residence is deemed to be equal using this method of assessment. I recommend that each 06perty be assessed based on how much property (square footage) abuts the roadway. Odgers, are subsidizing those who have doubleJtriple lots or corner lots. You should apply tho . same method of assessing as you use for property evaluation. I disagree with this method bf assessment. Curbs aid Via: I am not in favor of this soldHon. Curbs and gutters .ehange the character of the neighborhood and possibly will Cause the death of several 100- year -old oak trees on Kellogg Avenue. This will reduce the market value of my Property. All yard sprinkler systems and any other systems will have to be reinstalled at considerable Storm drains: Installing storm drains on the comers of Kellogg and 528d and 53`d Streets would alleviate standing water and drainage problems. Our drains in the middle of Kellogg between. 52nd and 5P Streets were replaced in 2003 and all drainage is adequate. Assessment Any amt levied against my residence, will incase my property value according to Mr. Houle and, theaeefore, it will also increase my propaly This is double taxation and I strenuously object to it 1. Why are 73 residences assessed for this project when they did not request it? For your my taxable madret value increased in 2005 by $75,000 and my Edina taxes and overall taxes iced by 9.3•/.1 Arden Pwk land adjacent to Broogview Avc The east side of Amokview Ave. from 5TI Stmt to Se Street is adjacent to the pads. Since there are no residences, the impreov to the streets as proposed are to be borne by all the residences in the proposal. I suspect the project was expanded because those who petitioned the City Council and those included by the City Planner could now "share" in the total costs of the curbing, resurfacing, storrm 96 er% li ghting and other costs associated with this portion of the project. If the ree were residences along the east side of the park the total costs would be reduced considerably. 1. Should not the Pa* Hoard ford be assessed for their share of the costs? 2. What amount is ava7able from the park syskm to cover their fair share of the Costs to be applied to this pt+ojet? (Approximately the equivalent of 20 residences). 3. There are other residences west of Arden Park who are not included in the project that are actually closer to the pads than my residence. The logic used regarding who pays for the v' in this assessment is beyond my Comprehension In may, I on not in favor of the project as preopose& I recommend resurfacing of the streets, repair the storm drains and add new ones where applicable at the City of Edma's vgmse. In fact, it could be argued this $1, 000, 000.00 taxis excessive when the City of Edina has neglected to upgrade. roads, sewers and utilities over several years and now want the residents to for improvets which should have been paid for out of their property and gas taxes I shah► eneoaraze you to reiect this brobdsal. If you appove this project, my total 2005 property taxes including the.assesnent will be $19,000.001 I look forwAid to your response on December 7, 2004. . Sincerely, �Aouis Attachment City of Edina, Nlinnesots - CITY COUNCIL 4801 W459 5M Sty • Fdiaa, Mlaomta 5N24 (612) 9274861 • (612) 927- 7645-FAX • (612) 927 -WI TDD P ETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ❑ SIDEWALK 9STORM SEWER ❑ ALLEY PAYING ❑ SANITARY SEWER CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER DATE: ❑ WATERMAIN ❑ STREET LIGHTING ❑ OTHER: To the Maya and City Council: The persons who have sigmd dds petition ask dw City Council to consider the imp�cweme81 listed above to the locations listed blow. W d bell= Annaas, wcnrioe� or u�eovaa�xr•Y a*� � . betwm err str stiBaz raam AMR= Loma aEnmRO�► �C�ctre, ADDRUX M SMUT aar� �� s � Vim■ a.. and �noRess am AnnRass and ADnRSSs and IIV�ORTAIUT NOS; THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED TffiS PETI'T'ION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESERO S AIMS THE PROPERTIES G FROM THE EWRO� COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTE& O OWNER, OWNFB'S NAM Sim"Tm (PSI r Ilk F IA, NAB PROPgRTY ADDRESS OWNERS PROM • � 11.E �� .,, _ &�dff r� 0i .� i C rewforal.W17 112 Then is space for move sib on the back or you may attach extra Pages. sw"3e 15 Steve Lillehaug From: Steve Lillehaug Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 5:42 PM To: 'vladgenny @visi.com' Cc: Steve Lillehaug Subject: RE: Neighborhood improvement project Thank you for your comments. We will further discuss this with you as the project moves forward. Thank you. Steve Steven L. Lillehaug, P.E. Edina Traffic Engineer /Assistant Engineer Engineering Department 952 - 826 -0445 slillehaug ®ci.edina.mn.us City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com (fax) 952- 826 -0389 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Vladimir Kedrovsky [mailto:vladgenny®visi.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 5:10 PM To: Steve Lillehaug Subject: Neighborhood improvement project First, thank you for your presentation Monday night to the 6:00 PM group. I know things like that are not easy or pleasant... I measured the width of the street out in front.of our property -.5228 Brookview Avenue and it came out 26 feet, grass to grass. I take that as a good sign... Our personal concern relates to the driveway. We spent considerable money (Rage did the work... ),putting in an exposed aggregate driveway. We hate to see part of it cut off and replaced by what we would consider an ugly white concrete apron. The first expansion joint is 516" up from the street edge of the driveway. I would guess that would be a "natural, for your paving crew. I don't know if it's possible, but anything that could be done to minimize the length of that apron and maximize the preservation of the existing driveway would be greatly appreciated. -Vlad Vlad & Genny Kedrovsky, Edina, MN, USA "Those who have been 'intoxicated with power... can never willingly abandon it." Edmund Burke 1 Page 1 of 2 Steve Lillehaug AgenAa.c':Idem# IV.C.1 From: Steve Lillehaug Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 9:04 AM To: 'Bob Shutes' Cc: Steve Lillehaug Subject: RE: Improvement A -204 Thank you for your e-mail. Your comments will be forwarded to the Council. The Council will be receiving a copy of the Feasibility Report (South Harriet Park West Improvement A -204)o n Tuesday, February 1, 2005. We will make it available to the Public at the same time on the following website: http://www.ci.edina.mn.us/Pages/L4-17a ConstructionProiects.htm We will be sending out individual notification letters to you within the next couple of days as well as an updated information letter. Staff is aware of the issues you raise regarding the current and potential change in the City's assessment policy. Staff will be recommending that the Council accept the project based on the current assessment policy. And, upon completion of the review of the assessment policy by the Council, if changes are made to the policy, our recommendation to the Council will be that the 2005 projects will fall under this new policy. As you indicated, the current policy is 100% by the benefited property owners. That percentage can only go down from there. The final assessment hearing will be held after the completion of the project. Please contact me with any further questions or comments. Thank you. Steven L. Lillehaug, P.E., P.T.O.E. Edina Traffic Engineer /Assistant Engineer Engineering Department 952 - 826 -0445 slillehaug @ci.edina.mn.us City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com (fax) 952 - 826 -0389 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Bob Shutes [mailto:rlshutes @mn.rr.com] Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2005 7:07 PM To: Steve Lillehaug Subject: Improvement A -204 Steve, thank you for your e-mail regarding the most recent assessment numbers I understand that the City Council is scheduled to consider the South Harriet Park West Roadway Improvements on February 15, 2005. 1 suggest that this meeting be rescheduled for a later date for two reasons. First, the City Council is in the midst of considering changes to our property tax assessment policy. Until the existing policy is affirmed or a new policy is adopted, the council should table consideration of Improvement A -204. The residents of this area do not want to be assessed 100% of the costs associated with Improvement A -204, only to learn that future projects will be assessed at something less than 100 %. 1/31/2005 r •• Page 2 of -2 Second, since last November, 2004, the residents affected by Improvement A -204 have been promised a copy of the feasibility study and a summary of the survey of residents. As of this date, two weeks before Improvement A -204 is to be considered by the City Council, we still don't have the promised material. Fairness dictates that we have an reasonable amount of time to review the promised material before any consideration of this matter by the City Council. I would appreciate you forwarding this e-mail to all city council members and the Mayor. I would also appreciate prompt consideration of the issues raised. 1/31/2005 Steve Lillehaug Frorn: Steve Lillehaug Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 9:04 AM To: 'Bob Shutes' Cc: Steve Lillehaug Subject: RE: Improvement A -204 _._..— Agenga!_.Zdem# -- IV.C. -1 - - Page 1 of 2 Thank you for your e-mail. Your comments will be forwarded to the Council. The Council will be receiving a copy of the Feasibility Report (South Harriet Park West Improvement A -204)o n Tuesday, February 1, 2005. We will make it available to the Public at the same time on the following website: http: / /vvww.ci.edina.mn.us /Pages /L4 -17a ConstructionProjects.htm We will be sending out individual notification letters to you within the next couple of days as well as an updated information letter. Staff is aware of the issues you raise regarding the current and potential change in the City's assessment policy. Staff will be recommending that the Council accept the project based on the current assessment policy. And, upon completion of the review of the assessment policy by the Council, if changes are made to the policy, our recommendation to the Council will be that the 2005 projects will fall under this new policy. As you indicated, the current policy is 100% by the benefited property owners. That percentage can only go down from there. The final assessment hearing will be held after the completion of the project. Please contact me with any further questions or comments. Thank you. Steven L. Lillehaug, P.E., P.T.O.E. Edina Traffic Engineer /Assistant Engineer Engineering Department 952 - 826 -0445 slillehaug @ci.edina.mn.us City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com (fax) 952 - 826 -0389 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Bob Shutes [mailto:rlshutes @mn.rr.com] Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2005 7:07 PM To: Steve Lillehaug Subject: Improvement A -204 Steve, thank you for your e-mail regarding the most recent assessment numbers. I understand that the City Council is scheduled to consider the South Harriet Park West Roadway Improvements on February 15, 2005. 1 suggest that this meeting be rescheduled for a later date for two reasons. First, the City Council is in the midst of considering changes to our property tax assessment policy. Until the existing policy is affirmed or a new policy is adopted, the council should table consideration of Improvement A -204. The residents of this area do not want to be assessed 100% of the costs associated with Improvement A -204, only to learn that future projects will be assessed at something less than 100 %. 1/31/2005 Page 1 of 1 Steve Lillehaug From: Steve Lillehaug Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 8:58 AM To: 'ELNESMKT @aol.com' Cc: Steve Lillehaug Subject: RE: South Harriet Park West Proposal Thank you for your e-mail. Your comments will be forwarded to the Council for consideration. Thanks. Steve Steven L. Lillehaug, P.E., P.T.O.E. Edina Traffic Engineer /Assistant Engineer Engineering Department 952 - 826 -0445 slillehaug @ci.edina.mn.us City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com (fax) 952 - 826 -0389 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: ELNESMKT @aol.com [mailto:ELNESMKT @aol.com] Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2005 10:17 AM To: Steve Lillehaug; marykay.cashetta @nwa.com Subject: South Harriet Park West Proposal I would like to echo the sentiments voiced in a recent a mail from Mary K Caschetta regarding the proposed roadway improvement in our neighborhood. We have lived on Brookview for almost thirty years and have never felt the parking by those using Arden Park has in any way inhibited travel through the area. The vast majority of people park on the east side of the street and only for an hour or so during a few weeks during the year. The value of the widening of the road would be inconsequential in our opinion. Thanks for your consideration. Rick Elnes Elnes Marketing Reines @elnesmarketing.com Elnesmkt @aol.com 2/7/2005 Page 1 of 1 Steve Lillehaug From: Steve Lillehaug Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 2:13 PM To: 'Kurt Kuno' Cc: Steve Lillehaug Subject: RE: South Harriet Park Road Improvement Project / Road Widening Thank you for your e-mail. Your comments will be forwarded to the Council for consideration. Thanks. Steve Steven L. Lillehaug, P.E., P.T.O.E. Edina Traffic Engineer /Assistant Engineer Engineering Department 952 - 826 -0445 slillehaug @ci.edina.mn.us City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com (fax) 952 - 826 -0389 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Kurt Kuno [ mailto :kkuno @peerlessplastics.com] Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 1:54 PM To: Steve Lillehaug Subject: Re: South Harriet Park Road Improvement Project / Road Widening Dear Steve, We live on 5236 Brookview Ave. - on the corner of 53rd and Brookview directly across from Arden Park We are not in favor or widening the roadway along the park, and would appreciate if you could note our opinion in the record. We would prefer other options such parking on one side of the street. Sincerely, Kurt Kuno Linda Kuno 2/7/2005 FW: South Harriet Park (West) Roadway Improvement Steve Lillehaug From: Fullmer, John D. Ofullmer@larkinhoffman.com] Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 10:18 AM To: Steve Lillehaug Subject: FW: South Harriet Park (West) Roadway Improvement - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Fullmer, John D. Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 10:17 AM To: 'slillehaug @cI.sdlna.mn.us' Subject: South Harriet Park (West) Roadway Improvement Page 1 of 1 I will not be able to attend the public hearing on 2/15, but would like to extend my strong support for the roadway improvement including curb and gutter. If the city and residents are going to make this badly needed improvement, it must include curb and gutter to maximize the utility and cost effectiveness of this improvement. I agree with staffs recommendations on all aspects of this project. Thank you. Larkin Hq ftan CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: INFORMATION IN THIS MESSAGE, INCLUDING ANY ATTACHMENTS, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE RECIPIENT(S) NAMED ABOVE. This message may be an Attorney - Client communication from the law firm of Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd., and as such Is privileged and confidential. If you are not an intended recipient of this message, or an agent responsible for delivering it to an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message In error, and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message Is strictly prohibited. If you received this message In error, please notify the sender Immediately, delete the message, and return any hard copy print -outs. No legal advice Is being provided or implied via this communication unless you are (1) a client of Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd., and (2) an Intended recipient of this message. Thank You. 2/7/2005 Proposed roadway & utility improvement project - South Harriet Park West Page 1 of 2 Steve Lillehaug From: Steve Lillehaug Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 10:20 AM To: 'Caschetta, Mary K' Cc: Steve Lillehaug Subject: RE: Proposed roadway & utility improvement project - South Harriet Park West Thank you for your comments. I will pass your comments on to the Council for Consideration. Additionally, staff will be further evaluating the parking along the park. It is staffs recommendation at this point not to widen the roadway. Thanks. Steve Steven L. Lillehaug, P.E., P.T.O.E. Edina Traffic Engineer /Assistant Engineer Engineering Department 952 - 826 -0445 slillehaug @ci.edina.mn.us City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com (fax) 952 - 826 -0389 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Caschetta, Mary K (mailto:marykay.caschetta @nwa.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 10:14 AM To: Steve Lillehaug Cc: Caschetta, Mary K Subject: Proposed roadway & utility improvement project - South Harriet Park West We noted with interest on the recently sent informational improvement sheet that several residents are "in favor of widening the roadway adjacent to the park to aid with on- street parking ". We live at 5304 Brookview Ave. Our house is located between the two footpaths that lead down to Arden Park and our driveway egress is on Brookview Ave. As such, we are one of the most impacted homes when others park their cars to access Arden Park. We submit that at least one (highly impacted) residential unit owner who has lived in their home for 16 years is opposed to widening the street along Arden Park. There are only a few weeks during the year where there is congestion due to park access parking. This is during the winter when the hockey rink is open. At that time, there certainly are some cars parked on the street, and it is somewhat inconvenient to get in /out of our driveway and down the street, but the Caschettas consider it a minor issue. The benefit of such a road - widening project would be immaterial, in our opinion. The cost would be quite large (project expense plus the intangible cost related to loss of a portion of our front yard and /or loss of a part of the park to accommodate the wider road). If the city and other neighbors consider this a material issue, we would like other options to be evaluated from a cost/benefit standpoint. For example, how about allowing parking on only one side of the street during the winter (this would result in immediate parking relief benefits, while incurring only a small signage cost). Perhaps others who live directly on the park should be solicited for their opinions on this matter. We respectfully request that you note this comment for the formal record. Thank you. 2n12005 Proposed roadway & utility improvement project - South Harriet Park West Page 2 of2 Ralph C. Caschetta Mary K. Caschetta 5304 Brookview Ave. Edina, MN 2/7/2005 A204 Mransrb.d. PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL SOUTH HARRIET PARK (WEST) AREA IMPROVEMENT A -204 CITY OF EDINA STREET PID 0 LEGAL STREET NO. OWNER ASSES SABLE LOTS LOT BLOCK TOTAL LOTS ASSESSMENT COST A Brookvlew Ave 18. 028.24 - 43-0002 2 1 5224 Jones, Thomas a Patricia t 1 S 8,857.14 18-02 8-7.4- 43.0003 3 f 5228 Kedrovsky. Vladimir a Gensvkm t 1 8657.14 18-02 8-24.43 -0004 4 t 5232 Fisher James 1 1 8557.14 18-028.24-43 -0005 5 11 5236 Kuno Kurt d Lade 1 1 8557.11 18. 028.24. 430076 1 a 5300 Halbrocks Jr James d J11 1 1 8 857. f 4 18-028. 2443-0077 2 6 5364 Caschetle Ralph d Mary 1 8 857.14 18-02 8-24-43 -0078 - 3 6 5308 Van Sam William d Marsha 1 7 8 557.14 18-028.24430079 4 6 5312 Salley, Douglas d Karen 1 1 8657.14 18-028.24-430080 5 6 5316 Anderson, Maurice d Eleanor 1 1 $ 8,557.14 18-028.24434081 5 6 5320 Nalco Elspeth 11 S 8657.14 18-028.24. 130082 7 6 5321 Elnes Barbara 1 11 S 8,657.14 18- 02 8-24. 13-0083 8 d 019 6 5328 Holmes Todd a Carol 1 1 I S 8,657.14 18- 028-24-43 -0084 019 a Dtio 8 5335 Hanue Gary & Trudy 1 1 I S 8657.14 S Kellogg Ave 18-02 8-24. 130022 1,2,3 3 5200 Vincent, Micheal 1 1 S 8,857.14 18-02844. 43-0023 4 3 5212 Shutes Robed a Mary 1 1 8 657.14 18-02 8-24-43-0024 5 3 5215 Mearra Louie d Louise 1 1 8 &57.14 18-02844- 434)025 6 3 5220 Leskee Jean 1 1 8657.14 18- 028.2443-0028 7 3 5224 Workinger, Geoffrey& Elizabeth 1 1 $ 8,657.14 18-028.24. 130027 8 3 5228 Carson Mark a Barbara 1 1 1 9657.14 18- 028 -24-13 -0028 9 3 5232 Moran Richard a Sara 1 1 8,657.1!L 18-028 -24- 43-0029 10 3 5236 Emmer. Jack a Wily 1 1 8,657.1 18-02 8-24-43 -0038 1 4 5300 Lattne. Laura 1 Its 8657.11 18-02 8-24-430039 2 4 5304 Molds Jeffrey d Margaret 1 1 B 657.11 18-028.24-43 -0040 3 4 5308 DeAnny, Glenn 1 1 865711 " 18-028.24- 430041 4 4 5312 Walker Sean 1 1 4 18-028.24-430042 5 4 5316 Lord William d Carol 1 1 1{ 18-028.24. 130043 6 4 5320 Akhtar . Adrian 1 1 14 18-028.24. 130044 7 4 5324 Seutz Christo er d Julie 1 1 14 18-02&24.13-0045 8& 9 4 5328 Keller. Fred a Katherine 1 1 14 H1,41 18-028.24-430046 10 4 5336 E le Mark d Karen 1 1 11 18-028- 24-430086 11 5 5351 F seen Rlehard a Nan 1 1 14 f 8-2 &24-43-0067 12 S 5349 Hammer Jon 8 1 1 14 18-028.24.430088 13 S 5341 L Scott & N f 1 14 18-028.24430089 14 5 5337 Crowley, Leonard d Jane f 1 S 8,657.14 18-02 8-2443-0070 15 5 5331 Lam John d Pam 1 1 8,657.14 18-025.24- 430071 1B 5 5325 Vetter Stanley 1 1 5 8657.14 18-02844-430072 17 5 5313 Stedman Jonathan d Katharine 1 1 2!W7! 11 18.02 &24 - 43-0073 18 5 5307 OuNtln d Ann Marie t f 885714 18-02 8-24 - 430074 19 5 5305 Rooney. Daniel d Susan 1 1 $ 8,647.1/ 18-02 8-24-43-0075 20 5 5301 Canny, Gary& Robin 1 1 $ 8,857.14 18-028.24- 13-0018 12 8 P11113 2 5237 Fogarty, William & Carol 1 - 1 8,657.14 18-028.2443 -0017 p113 a P114 2 5233 Fullmer John d Barbara 1 1 8,657.14 18-028 -24- 43-0018 p114 & pk15 2 5225 Fuspner. Robert a Jane 1 7 S 8,657.14 1&02 8-24-43 -0019 15 & to 2 5221 Wh 1 1 B 657.14 1&02844- 430020 17 2 5217 Sheehan f 1 8657.1{ 18-02 &24-410021 to 2 5211 Eck ED 1 1 8857.11 18-02 8-24430007 1 1&2 2 5201 lVotta. Densen - 1 1 8,657.1!L Oaklawn Ave 18-02 6-24 - 430008 3&4 2 5200 Somerville, James a Antoinette 1 1 $ 8,857.14 IMS -24. 130009 5 2 5216 Goldman Malthm & Anty, 1 1 8657.14 18-028. 2443-0010 6 2 5720 Jondahl Barbara 1 1 9857.11 18-028.24-430011 7 2 5224 Tak John 6 Mary 1 1 8 657.14 18-02 11-21 -430012 8 2 5228 Johnson Lawrence & Terry 1 f 8,657.14 18- 028.24-43-0013 B 2 5232 Polabld Jane f t 8657.14 ta- 028.24-43-0014 10 2 5236 Knecht J 1 1 8657.14 18-02 8-24-430015 11 2 5240 Blankenship, Ned 6 Susan 1 1 a.657.14 18-28.24-430050 1 S 5300 Hardy, Rodney& Katharine 1 1 1 a.657.14 18-0284443-0057 2 5 5304 Carlson Jay & Sandra 1 1 1 8,657.14 18-020. 24-430058 3 5 5309 Collins Martin 1 I Ils 8 657.14 18-028.24430059 4 5 5318 Vaubel Cahn & Janette f I Ils 8.657A41 18- 028.24-430080 5 S 5324 Skailerd, Wiliam - 1 I 11S 8,857.11 18 -028- 24-430081 a 5 5328 Vaurb Jr Carl & Patricia 1 1 8,657.14 18-028.24.130082 7 5 5332 1131111fiedin. Mart d Elena 1 1 $ 8,657.14 18-028.24-430083 0 S 5338 Pebsreon, Rol 1 1 $ 8,657.14 18- 028.24-43-0064 8 S 5318 Terwilliger. Jeffrey d JennRer 1 1 $ 8,657.14 18-028.24-43-0085 10 5 5348 Timmer, Steven d Lynn f 1 $ 8,657.14 18- 02844.43 -0085 into & 11 6 5357 Lahance, Dennis d Shard 1 1 $ 8,657.14 18-028 -24-43 -0088 12 6 5351 - Akan, Sandra 1 1 S 8,857.14 18- 028.2443-0087 13 a 5313 Mcveety, Roger 1 1 $ 8,557.14 18-028.24 - 43-0088 14 6 5337 Robb Peter d Cordite 1 11$ 8,557.14 18-02844-43-0089 15 2 5331 1 Starkey, Dann y& Pamela 1 1 $ 8,857.14 19-02 &24-4390 00 16 0 5325 Larson, Patter& Jill 1 1 $ 8,857.14 48-028 -24 -43 -0091 17 6 5319 Lund. Thomas a Stephanie 1 1 $ - 8,657.14 18-028-24-410092 t8 6 5311 Shoemaker, Kent a GrifonL Maria 1 1 $ 8,657.14 18-028 - 24430093 to 8 5305 Voss, Grepry & Cyntltla 1 1 $ 8,657.14 18-02 8-24.43.009{ 20 8 5301 Sparrow. James a Katie 1 1 S 8,657.14 18-02 8-24430008 8 1 - 5241 Hoiker, Jeffrey & Cindy 1 1 1 $ 8,657.14 1&028.244134=1 1 1 5227 Crain, Peter d Jeanne 1 1 $ 8,057.14 S 62nd St W 1&02844-42.0078 4 4431 Kenworft, Marta 1 1 $ 8.657.14 1S• 028.24. 42-0075 3&pt4 4429 Mcglynn, Michael 6 Julie 1 1 & 8,657.14 18-02 8-24-42-0074 2 1{25 Lagerstrom, Edward d Julie 1 1 $ 8,657.14 18- 02844-42-0073 1 4421 Carpenter, Kyle el Shelly 1 1 $ 8,857.14 S Wooddale Ave 18- 2844-42-0077 5 5133 Samuelson J N. & Marys L. UJ 0.333333 S - 2,885.71 18-02 8-24-43 -0037 3 5201 Hunter. William W. a Marbn A. 173 0.33333 $ 2,885.71 18- 02 8-24. 43.0030 3 5245 H an, Frank J. & Laura H. 123 0.333333 $ 2,885.71 18-02 &24 - 43-0055 20 4 5301 Jenn a, O. Erie a Adrlana T. 1/3 0.333333 $ 2,883.71 Amen Park ivalem foie f f 93.33333 $ 808,0=.= TOTAL PROJECT COST (Roadway) $ 808,000.00 AVERAGE COST PER LOT $ 8,647.14 Pape 1 5 :ie PLW7/M Agenda Item M.A. From: crobb@mn.rr.com Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2005 4:24 PM To: Steve Lillehaug Subject: South Harriet Park Improvement Mr. Lillehaug..As you know most of the residents in the South Harriet Park area are in favor of improving our streets. Hopefully with the new roads and improved grading our standing water problems will be virtually eliminated. I'm sure you are also aware that a majority of the residents DO.NOT WANT CURBS AND GUTTERS. Not only is it not necessary but it would take away from the charm and appeal of OUR neighborhood. We don't want our neighborhood to look like the Country Club area or South Minneapolis. We expect that our roads will be improved with the minimal amount of assessment to each home owner and expect that there will be NO damage to our beautiful trees that line our trees. We don't OAKLAWN to become OAKLESS! We will send a similar email to the mayor and city council members. Thank you. Peter & Cynthia Robb 5337 Oaklawn '•. r From:.Wayne Houle Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 5:05 PM To: Steve Lillehaug Subject: FW: Proposed project No. A -204 Wayne Houle whoule @ci.edina.mn.us 952 - 826 -0443 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 4:32 PM To: 'EDECKBERG @aol.com' Cc: Wayne Houle Subject: RE: Proposed project No. A -204 Dear Mr. Eckberg: Thank you for your interest in the City of Edina. Your message was forwarded upon receipt to Administration Department Secretary Darlene Wallin, 952 -826- 0406, who will make sure each member of the Council receives a copy. If I can be of additional assistance, please contact me. Jennifer Bennerotte Communications Director City of Edina 952 - 833 -9520 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 jbennerotte @ci.edina.mn.us - - - -- Original Message--- - From: EDECKBERG@aol.com (mailto:EDECKBERG @aol.com] Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 4:17 PM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: Proposed project No. A -204 Edina City Council City Hall Edina, MN 55424 VIA: E -mail: edinamail @ci.edina.mn.us Dear City Council Members, I am writing to oppose proposal No. A -204, on which I understand you will conduct a hearing on Tuesday, February 15, 2005. The "Informational Sheet" does not accurately state the issues. Our street has served us well for 70 years. There is generally no pavement failure, safety is fine, drainage is adequate (when standing pools have occurred, the simple addition of a storm drain solved the problem), driveway and traffic control is not a problem. Cleaning and snow plowing work just fine. There is no need for "concretalization" of this neighborhood and most residents are opposed to it. The statement that "impacts (to trees) will be mimimized" is an piously hopeful, but erroneous, declaration. If you drive down Kellogg and note the majestic oaks that line the street (many directly at street's edge) you will realize that excavation for curb and gutter will severely damage, or even kill, those oaks. Everyone knows that oak roots should not be disturbed, if one is concerned about the health of the tree. This project is unnecessary and invasive. I hope that you will support the majority of residents of our neighborhood who oppose this project and vote to not approve it. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Sincerely yours, E. Daniel Eckberg 5211 Kellogg Ave. CC: Kellogg Neighbors Saar mac. e#u-�, � �) .9 /,u•.� ,tom. �.� � ��- � _ �� � ¢� ��,Gw.. OQo ,„,a,� .�,�,.� C�,ccn,G..d. a,+�•�C ��,�,�,• ,r,�.�!'L� a.- w�s�.� 4 AAA�� OVJ- AMt d44, t AL �3 6�� Darlene Wallin * rom: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 4:30 PM To: Darlene Wallin Subject: FW: Proposed project No. A -204 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: EDECKBERG @aol.com [mailto:EDECKBERG @aol.com] Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 4:17 PM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: Proposed project No. A -204 Edina City Council City Hall Edina, MN 55424 VIA: E -mail: edinamail @ci.edina.mn.us Dear City Council Members, I am writing to oppose proposal No. A -204, on which I understand you will conduct a hearing on Tuesday, February 15, 2005. The "Informational Sheet" does not accurately state the issues. Our street has served us well for 70 years. There is generally no pavement failure, safety is fine, drainage is adequate (when standing pools have occurred, the simple addition of a storm drain iolved the problem), driveway and traffic control is not a problem. Cleaning nd snow plowing work just fine. There is no need for "concretalization" of this neighborhood and most residents are opposed to it. The statement that "impacts (to trees) will be mimimized" is a piously hopeful, but erroneous, declaration. If you drive down Kellogg and note the majestic oaks that line the street (many directly at street's edge) you will realize that excavation for curb and gutter will severely damage, or even kill, those oaks. Everyone knows that oak roots should not be disturbed, if one is concerned about the health of the tree. This project is unnecessary and invasive. I hope that you will support the majority of residents of our neighborhood who oppose this project and vote to not approve it. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Sincerely yours, E. Daniel Eckberg 5211 Kellogg Ave. CC: Kellogg Neighbors 1 REPORURECOM M EN DATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # II. B. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE Consent ❑ City Engineer Information Only ❑ Date: February 15, 2005 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Public Hearing for Action ® Motion Sunnyslope Neighborhood ® Resolution Roadway Improvement BA- 326. El Ordinance F-1 Discussion Recommendation: If the Council determines the project to be warranted and necessary, Council shall adopt a resolution approving Sunnyslope Neighborhood Roadway improvements, City Improvement No. BA- 326, authorize plans and specifications to be completed and bids taken. Info /Background: This project was partially initiated by a resident petition to address several issues within the neighborhood. This petition is included in the packet. The proposed project involves reconstructing the existing roadway including new concrete curb and gutters, rehabilitating the watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer, and installing decorative streetlights. The estimated roadway and decorative lighting construction cost is $1,226,000. This cost does not include costs for City utility repairs; staff is analyzing these repairs and will include them with final plans; funding for these repairs will be funded through the respective utility funds. Funding for the roadway and decorative street lights will be from a special assessment of approximately $16,800 per residential equivalent unit (REU). ° 0 The Feasibility Study is included with this report, along with all correspondence received to date. Staff analyzed the project and feels that the project is feasible from an engineering standpoint. GAImprovements \BA326 Sunnyslope Area \MISC \Feasibility\RRpublic hearing - BA326.doc i91N— \1 FEASIBILITY STUDY - BA326 Cn �o ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT • �RA ,�,. CITY OF EDINA STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS SUNNYSLOPE NEIGHBORHOOD JANUARY 26, 2005 LOCATION: The Sunnyslope Neighborhood project includes East & West Sunnyslope Road, Woodhill Way, Ridge Place, Dale Drive and Hilltop Lane (see Figure 1). 4912 au� �, y� 4504 tF - aoues , 45 4916 1 4903 m 454 1 4507 4508 ,I 4 4920 490 4800 4801 �� 1 4509 4510 �. r 4804 4907 4511 4512 I� 4808 4911 4909 4805 4513 4514 i 4801 4800 4515 4516 i 4812 4805 460, -_ 4600 4820 4804 % 4518 452 -- - . add 4824 4808 ij� 4600 - 4803 4602 4808 4605 4604 4826 4813 { 4602 460 4606 4817 - -_- 4832 4804 4800 u.sy 9 4604. 4809 4608_ 4821 4808 4901 i 4811 4610 _ 4838 4816 4812 4610' 4613 4612 1 4801 a 4905 4615 4614 �- - -1 - 4612 = 4900 W1004DHILL WAY 4614 4907 1 4618 4617 461 4901 4813 4705 4904 4619 4904 ' 4909 4818 4820 4621 4905 4904 49(18 W4 4623 Project 4828 462 S 4909 4900 4700 4913 Boundary 4632 4908 _ s 4905 4630 4913 4634 4912 4912 4917 14638484 4917 S 4916 4916 p►' 4921 4916 4921 4925 *Oft 920 4925 4920 4913 4810 4929 4920 4924rq 4929 4924 4933 4928 4929 4809 4805 4801 4928 e`"� Project Area w�E � � )� Sunnyslope Neighborhood S d BA -326 Engineering Dept January, 2005 Figure 1. Project Area Map Feasibility Study Sunnyslope Neighborhood Imp. No. BA -326 January 26, 2005 INITIATION & ISSUES: The Sunnyslope Neighborhood project was initiated partially by a resident petition to address several issues including drainage problems at Dale Drive and East Sunnyslope Road, sidewalk along West 501h Street, permanent street surfacing with curb and gutter (in some areas), and ornamental street lighting. The Engineering Department expanded this area and included the neighborhood as outlined in Figure 1 as part of the City's planning process to update the critical infrastructure within this neighborhood. The following are existing features and resident comments that present issues in determining the feasibility of the project and are addressed in this report: • Surface rainwater drainage issues. • Frequent watermain and service breaks. • Poor condition of existing pavement. • Existing landscaping, retaining walls, driveways, etc. • Existing overhead utility lines and poles. • Concerns with pedestrian safety and vehicle speeds. • Requests for a traffic signal light on West 501h Street EXISTING CONDITIONS: The majority of the roadways and utilities in this neighborhood were originally constructed in the 1940's. The roadway widths vary in this neighborhood ranging from 26 -ft to 32 -ft with a few locations of existing curb and gutter and no sidewalks. The pavement condition varies throughout the neighborhood but is in relatively poor condition overall (see Photos 1 and 2). Photo 1. Existing Pavement Condition Page 2 of 9 Feasibility Study Sunnyslope Neighborhood Imp. No. BA -326 January 26, 2005 Photo 2. Existing Pavement Condition FA Street grades vary throughout the neighborhood but many locations are relatively flat and level. There is existing storm sewer in the area, but overall the surface drainage is very poor (see Photos 3 and 4). Additionally, the existing storm sewer line located along Dale Drive at East Sunnyslope Road lacks positive drainage due to the elevations of the sewer line relative to the adjacent water level of Minnehaha Creek. � w 4 Photo 3. Existina Drainaae and Pavement Conditions Page 3 of 9 Feasibility Study Sunnyslope Neighborhood Imp. No. BA -326 January 26, 2005 Photo 4. Existing Drainage and Pavement Condition In recent years, watermain and water service breaks are occurring with increased frequency in this neighborhood while minimal sanitary sewer blockages have been reported. Many property owners have placed boulders or other obstructions within the City right -of -way creating barriers along the roadway. These types of barriers and landscaping items are prohibited from being placed in the boulevard in accordance with Edina City Code 1200.02. Other typical items exist adjacent to the roadway such as retaining walls, concrete driveways, landscaping, shrubs, trees and fences. Much of the private utility lines in this neighborhood are overhead (with the exception of the gas lines). Street lighting consists of standard "cobra head" lights mounted on wood poles that are typically located at the intersections with some midblock locations. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: The Sunnyslope Neighborhood project involves the following improvements: • Reconstructing the existing bituminous pavement. • Constructing new concrete curb and gutter. • Replacing the existing watermain and the water services from the new watermain to the curb boxes (valves located at the property lines). • Repairing the sanitary sewer where needed. • Revising the storm sewer to accommodate the new concrete curb and gutter and correct the existing storm sewer problems along Dale Drive. • Installing drain tile where needed to allow the property owners to connect their sump pump discharges directly into the storm sewer system. • Installing new ornamental lighting. Page 4 of 9 Feasibility Study Sunnyslope Neighborhood Imp. No. BA -326 January 26, 2005 A neighborhood informational meeting was held on November 9, 2005 to gather data and answer questions the homeowners had relating to the project. Over 26 residents attended this meeting. Input from this meeting and comments received throughout the planning of this project have been ,,included in this report as an attachment. A neighborhood survey was sent to learn the favorability of several options being considered with this project. The results of the survey are shown in Table 1. *Note: Based on a 1 to 3 ranking system. (Traditional was most favored with the lowest average ranking of 1.21.) Prefer Soundwall Perceived Traffic Safety Issue Prefer Prefer Traffic Calmin /O Assess W /Assess Overhead No Yes No Yes Utilities YES No YES Relocated to Prefer Decorative Street Total Surveys Returned Prefer Curb & Gutter lUnderground Lights Sent Survey Yes No B- HEADS -MOUNT Yes No Yesl No Style* % of Returned Surveys 50% 35% 31% 62% 29% 65% 13% 85% 38% Colonial Acorn Traditional 74 51 13 29 22 20 22 27 33 20 2.051.88 1.21 % of Returned Surveys 70% 25% 56% 42% 38% 42% 52 %63 %37% *Note: Based on a 1 to 3 ranking system. (Traditional was most favored with the lowest average ranking of 1.21.) Table 1. Survey Results The following is a summary regarding the survey results including staff's recommendations: The majority of residents do not"prefer new concrete curb and gutter — Staff recommends constructing concrete curb and gutter in this neighborhood. Concrete curb and gutter tends to be more cost effective over the life of the street, reduces pavement failure, provides safety, controls drainage, provides driveway and traffic control, and aids cleaning and snow plowing. Concrete curb and gutter is specifically needed to properly address the drainage issues throughout the neighborhood. The majority of residents do not prefer relocating overhead utilities to underground — Staff does not recommend pursuing this issue since a direct benefit to each property for this improvement is difficult to substantiate. However, residents may pursue this option and coordinate directly with the utility companies if desired. (Staff will assist coordinating with the utility companies if requested.) Page 5 of 9 Prefer Soundwall Perceived Traffic Safety Issue Prefer New Sidewalks Prefer Traffic Calmin /O Assess W /Assess Yes No Yes No Yes No YES No YES No 26 18 16 32 1.5 34 7 44 20 28 % of Returned Surveys 50% 35% 31% 62% 29% 65% 13% 85% 38% 54% Table 1. Survey Results The following is a summary regarding the survey results including staff's recommendations: The majority of residents do not"prefer new concrete curb and gutter — Staff recommends constructing concrete curb and gutter in this neighborhood. Concrete curb and gutter tends to be more cost effective over the life of the street, reduces pavement failure, provides safety, controls drainage, provides driveway and traffic control, and aids cleaning and snow plowing. Concrete curb and gutter is specifically needed to properly address the drainage issues throughout the neighborhood. The majority of residents do not prefer relocating overhead utilities to underground — Staff does not recommend pursuing this issue since a direct benefit to each property for this improvement is difficult to substantiate. However, residents may pursue this option and coordinate directly with the utility companies if desired. (Staff will assist coordinating with the utility companies if requested.) Page 5 of 9 Feasibility Study Sunnyslope Neighborhood Imp. No. BA -326 January 26, 2005 • The majority of residents prefer installing decorative street lighting (Traditional Style) — Staff recommends installing decorative street lighting in this neighborhood as part of this project. Street lighting is proposed to be installed at the intersections and several midblock locations. • The majority of residents do not prefer installing a sound wall with a special assessment — Staff does not recommend pursuing this issue beyond what has been previously approved as part of the Mn /DOT sound wall project without the support of those that would be directly assessed for this improvement since a direct benefit to each property for this improvement is difficult to substantiate. • The majority of residents do not perceive a traffic safety issue between vehicles and pedestrians /bicyclists in this neighborhood. • The majority of residents do not prefer constructing sidewalks in this neighborhood. Staff does not recommend constructing sidewalks in this neighborhood. However, the sidewalk along West 50 "' Street between Dale Drive and Browndale Avenue is recommended to be reconstructed with a boulevard between the curb and the walk if easements are granted by the adjacent property owners. (If easements are granted, the sidewalk reconstruction project would be included as part of a separate project. West 50th Street is designated as a State Aid route and State Aid funds can be obtained and applied to the sidewalk improvement.) • The majority of residents do not prefer implementing a traffic calming device in this neighborhood — Staff does not recommend implementing traffic calming devices in this neighborhood as part of this project since a direct benefit to each property for this improvement is difficult to substantiate. Additionally, traffic surveys were performed on East Sunnyslope Road and Dale Drive in September 2000. The Monday through Friday average daily traffic volumes were 327 and 113 vehicles per day and the 851h- percentile speeds were 31.5 mph and 27.9 mph, respectively. These vehicle volumes and speeds are very typical throughout Edina neighborhoods on local roadways. The survey results indicated that a barrier style curb (13618, B -Head) is more desirable versus the surmountable style curb (drive -over, S- mount). Staff recommends installing a barrier style curb and gutter as it will work well with the existing topography within this neighborhood (see Figure 2). A barrier style curb provides the best control of water runoff and better defines the roadway while providing protection to the sod and pavement edge from snowplow damage in the winter months. B618 C ❑NC CURB & GUTTER 6' RI /2' R 3' AT 3/S' R 3' 6' SLpPE 3/4' PER FT.` - BASE j h. 7 112' 16' — i a' Figure 2. Typical Barrier /Bulkhead Curb and Gutter Page 6 of 9 Feasibility Study Sunnyslope Neighborhood Imp. No. BA -326 January 26, 2005 The pavement throughout this neighborhood appears to be at the end of its useful life while the costs to maintain and repair the roadways are steadily increasing. Overlaying or seal coating the pavement in this neighborhood is not feasible. The proposed width for the roadways throughout the neighborhood is 29 -ft back -to -back of curb (Hilltop Lane is 31 -ft). Intersection geometrics are proposed to be revised to reduce the pavement area and create more standard T- intersections (see Figure 3). Trees will be protected and impacts to the trees will be minimized. Figure 3. Proposed Project Layout ,—%A! Page 7 of 9 Feasibility Study Sunnyslope Neighborhood Imp. No. BA -326 January 26, 2005 Staff is continuing to analyze the utility repairs /replacements and will include the needed improvements with the final plans. Other utility activities usually include replacement of gas mains within the neighborhood, which is determined and coordinated by the local gas utility company. At this time, staff is not recommending the installation of a new traffic signal light on West 50`h Street at Dale Drive. This improvement is currently in the City's five -year Capital Improvements Program scheduled for 2009. A traffic study must be performed and specific warrants must be met for approval of a signal at this location. Additionally, 50 percent of the cost of this signal (if warranted) could be funded through State Aid funds, as West 50`h Street is a designated State Aid Route. RIGHT -OF -WAY & EASEMENTS The right -of -way throughout the Sunnyslope neighborhood is typically 60 feet wide (Hilltop Lane is 40 -ft). All proposed improvements stay within this right - of -way and no additional easement requirements are anticipated. FEASIBILITY: This project is feasible from an engineering and City standpoint. PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $1,226,000 (including approximately $140,000 for the ornamental lighting). The total cost includes indirect costs of 15% for engineering and clerical costs and 7.5% for first year finance costs. The estimated construction cost does not include storm sewer, watermain or utility improvements. Final utility improvements will be determined during the final design and will be funded through the respective utility fund. Funding for the entire project will be from a combination of special assessment and utility funds. ASSESSMENTS: A special assessment of approximately $16,800 per residential equivalent unit or assessable lot will be levied against residents adjacent to the neighborhood's roadways. The justification for assessments is attributed to properties receiving benefit of the new pavement, the addition of concrete curb and gutter and the addition or ornamental street lighting. The assessable lot is based on a detached single family home. Properties, that abut the project and have access with their side or rear yards will be assessed 1/3 of the assessable unit cost (see Figure 4). PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following .schedule is feasible from an Engineering standpoint: Council Orders Public Hearing .. .........................January 18, 2005 Receive Feasibility Report ............ ........................February 1, 2005 Public Hearing ............................ ........................February 15, 2005 BidOpening ....... ............................... .........................April 2005 Award Contract ............................... ............................... May 2005 Begin Construction .......................... ............................... May 2005 Complete Construction ........ ............................... ...........October 2005 Page 8 of 9 Feasibility Study Sunnyslope Neighborhood Imp. No. BA -326 January 26, 2005 ATTACHMENTS: 4912 4504 45 4916 4508 4507 4508 4 4804 4801 920 4800 1 4509 4510 4 4907 —� 4511 4512 4808 4805 4909 4513 4514 4911 4801 4800 4515 4516 4812 — -- 4805 4601 4800 4820 4804 4518 452 4603 4602 4809 4600 4824 4808 4605 4604 �H 4828 4813 4602 4607 4608 4832 4817 4804 4800 �puna�tr 4609 4608 4821 4608 4901 4611 46110 4836 4818 4812 4610 4613 4612 4801 w 4905 4615 4614 a 4612 4900 WOOOHILL WAY 4907 4616 4617 461 4705 4904 i 1 4614 4619 — 4901 4813 z 4618 4820 4621 4 4904 ! 4905 4904 4908 w 4909 -- 4824 4623 = Project 4828 462 14908 m 4809 4908 c 4700 4913 Boundary 4832 4 ° 4� 4630 I y 4913 4634 4912 z 4912 4917 38 4917 �O 4916 3 4918 OP 4921 4916 4921 4925 4925 920 4920 4913 4810 4929 4 4 � �p 4929 92 OP L 4920 4924 4933 4928 4929 4809 4805 4801 4928 N�HN�A Assessments With Curb & Gutter and Ornamental Lighting / $16.800 wN o Preliminary Assessment Map w E Sunnyslope Neighborhood S v BA -326 Lngineering Dept January, 2005 Figure 4. Preliminary Assessment Map • Petition for Improvements in the Sunnyslope Neighborhood • Information Meeting Attendance List and Comments • Survey Results and Comments • Project Comments and Letters Received • Preliminary Assessment Roll Page 9 of 9 e- �t�1r A -!iJ'E CTovI. t C -r ;Zw 6a.)ezr- -`- �, a City of Edina, Minnesota DATE: CITY COUNCIL, o 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 (612) 9278861 • (612) 927 - 7645 -FAX • (612) 927 - 5461 -TDD PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ( .SIDEWA,:LK Ai.cw6 �..�: -30 'A ❑ ALLEY PAVING �1 S.I'ORM SENN'ER© p ,e"'' .. D SANITARY SEWER C1 CURB AND.GUTTER ONLY PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER IN SoM 1F_- Ptn -%_0rS ❑ WATERNIAIN STREET LIGHTING L� OTHER:: -- Rpvn+ 16A BOUTS 9 TZMW. } �bC.6- ?,A To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask-the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. 1zt between and LOCATION OF IN&ROVEMENT BY SrREVr NAIZ ADDRESS ADDRESS _ between and LOCATION OF LdeROVE%*_NT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS _ between and LOCATION OF IMPROVENIENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS _ _ _ betw= and _ 5EATlcrti OF IN ROVEINIENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE ]IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED.BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S S 1 G�i d'lllliE OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S (PRINTED) PHONE This p6lion was circulated by: NA 3IE �b tkZ b'C -Yad 47M �br.. ��rt_ 9S7-- jz0--»34 ADDRESS o^ t.3 Ala 41 6:A 3e(!5- 5 VAS 9,9 L-3 2_0 - ')-) 3 4 PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages. SEFrEWSM 19M PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S SIGNATURE (PRINTED) PHONE PRCKgcEE 6 ackS _ J,pEruA c K o-v SVOK m ow6 cr4 c x :3' 28 � s . u(&tkysl©�e Ct5a--iX-0'7l ke `lam /� ���.i� -ice30$ use +rt ©� o� OF LAMES L%l+nTcCv» aS Q► 4S.�-920 ?�T� VW I*c,1�".l ioS �•+� � i�4 II1(.Pco h : (I t.� 9� z- g �' �► �{ ► � SIGN -IN SHEET SUNNYSLOPE AREA IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -326 INFORMATIONAL MEETING NOVEMBER 9, 2004 NAME n ADDRESS l ass d 43o co Zlr)1ot PC,4cE SSA{ Z a ,- Wl, k� z. r 12 5 � k v. y- F o �, .� ,,,_, inn C"\4 (,`�N A 7L �L- L �- o u0 c c "m_ _ SW n v is I C Pd- 914T �v+o 0 Gb •JLs 6 we 5 4 r )5 \n1 S on AA-(- r rn LC,k 1) QUESTION / COMMENT CARD --1 C v r r{.1 LJ`. Nam e AfkPQLf Address b LC% e �� V PLEASE PRINT n PLEASE PRINT 9�1 -v�- 8,9--- �hvhe Ccal Rs�.eiged ll�ylU`� by Skye- C QUESTION / COMMENT CARD Name �b � ty-&k& k � Address Jarn4 stoee- PLEASE PRINT PLEASE PRINT 9 2i - X030 QUESTION / COMMENT CARD 'mot" rw - "445404 Tm "�>a ,% - atitie, &&&3 k! 14i. k ftgz ymsa • ua.,G -cAm &eAwa t Cew i<tt& eN i e.g. t�. i Ksr s Ao D %KA,,p. 6oA&b 3 . NO r2AptL PLovsc bo ma —t. &.Low-rc- --aw Ceedx, 1 NameSlft O'DEM&G-2 (' Address'"OS e.10,66 pt-W SS4t�I PLEASE PRINT PLEASE PRINT PLEASE PRINT PLEASE PRINT QUE Name Address W"a, PLEASE PRINT PLEASE PRINT QUESTION / COMMENT CARD 1 W 1 AFL% �jCC/y TH M40,15 -r t,,v T b fzoK& vo �-� ► 1 Name D /4V )P �- V i� 1 dN% Address r'I I -Z ID 4�pr J-AL� PLEASE PRINT PLEASE PRINT QUESTION / COMMENT g6RD S r =t- r '-PLEASE PRINT paxbt rxLm i (,c, to r+1,�-e r QUESTION / COMMENT CARD ► rA Address PLEASE PRINT PLEASE PRINT Nam QUESTION / COMMENT CARD Name RA NOS MO 6 K AL- 1 le, Address 4qO 8 t-=- ® SU NN 7SLot'-c- PLEASE PRINT PLEASE PRINT QUESTION / COMMENT CARD Name Tom', Address L,5 �� l PLEASE PRINT PLEASE PRINT ON / COMMENT CARD Wj t i1-1-� Name 7 Q" 9 V,o 6L( Address ! PLEASE PRINT PLEASE P NT STION / COMMENT CARD is Grta-N-T- N +" OC) �,. WpvL c c s_r` w c rc -� e.N w-e- vv-cv\pe- you4v6 cv-- kl-Dhv -�j c.,o,-2..s A Tz-` Vim_ �!'cs I h a w N, �- f --�- t LL . I`6 -rz /' - S nn4 LA, V-- iwiN1OAZV� cos % _-� o �� C�H-1 c�T .S �w�4 ceyo w a 1,37 � 3�� G l L l iF pt c'H+l u->. 1 Name �J IM �� c-`r� Address PLEASE PRINT PLEASE PRINT QUESTION / COMMENT CARD Ax � o� Kit x i– �- 4- Nome � /W Address Womlhl�/ A, PLEASE PRINT PLEASE PRINT QUESTION / COMMENT CARD TAA J .4—kex �- u1a w PRINT PLEASE PRINT QUESTION / COMMENT CARD ow t Address Ogo'() t4-S r -!�' S-. PLEASE PRINT PLEASE PRINT QUESTION / COMMENT CARD rol (V0 5 d?, w awl Ks Name Pc C.hOc. o� Address tfqo 4 C Sall n HS /op f �4. PLEASE PRINT PLEASE PRINT SUNNYSLOPE AREA IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-326 SURVEY RESULTS Returned Preferred Curb d Gutter LIM Relocate DecontNe Street LIghts SOUNDWALL SAFETY NEW SIDEWALKS TRAFFIC CALMING COMMENTS NO. STREET Yes No B- HEAD S -MOUNT Yes No Yes No le W /Obsess Wlbsesa Yes No Yes No Yes No Caws A.— T.&bva Y. No Y. No 4700 DALE DR X X X 1 X X X X 'W/O the sidewalk and with the hit, thee s significant risk when cars speed by. Someone will be hi evenluallyll 4913 DALE DR rl X X X X 1 X X X X X Would refer traffic circle. 4916 DALE DR X X X % X X X X 4920 DALE DR 4924 DALE DR X X X 2 3 1 X X X• X X" 'At times when Cars goes fast "We believe this is needed. Traffic calming measures (signage) are needed to decrease cersrlrucks entering Dale Dr of 50th who do not reside here (Sunnysope) or otherwise have business In n'hood. Speeding, tom" around and driving over lawns are problems. 4928 DALE DR 1 X X % X 3 2 1 X X X X X We get 10-201um -amunds in our driveway per day. The source is the lack of signage for traffic eastbound on 50th regarding ramp. Additional signage would be a welcome addlbonal to reduce traffic flow iho the n'hood. 4928 DALE OR 4801 HILLTOP LA 1 X X X X' )C• X•• X'•• X_ X"••• 'Depends on locaton;"Need to know more specifics; "'No more or less than other n'hoods; ""We lice sidewalks but feel the topography of our n'hood is not conducive; • We need mostly a semaphore at Dale 8 W. 50th St Ede Rice has been in two near fatal dashes at Dale 6 50th. Also Edina or Mn/Dot should study why so many vehicles are confused enough extitg Hwy 100 o go the wrong way on 50th St or Vernon. At least 25.50 vehicles per clay tom onto Dale and then turn around in a driveway or pull a'U' tom C Dale 6 Hilltop. Why?? Something about the signage must be confusing them. Thank you. 4805 HILLTOP LA 1 X X X X• X•• X•' X"' X_ X•'•'• 'Depends on location; ^Need to know more spedlics; •••No more or less than other n'hoods; —We live sidewalks but feel the topography of our n7mod is not conducive; ­We need mostly a semaphore at Dale 6 W. 50th SL Ede Rice has been in two near fatal crashes at Dale 8 50th. Also Edina or Mn/Dot should study why so many vehicles are confused enough exiting Hwy 100 to go the wrong way on 50th St or Vernon. At least 25-50 vehicles per day tum ono Dale and then tom around in a driveway or pull a'1P tom C Dale 8 Hilltop. Why!? Something about the signage must be mrhfus'og them. Thank you. 4809 HILLTOP LA 1 X X X X X X Ours is buried. 1 am not concerned with traffic on 50th St as my backyard comes up to 50th across from Cih Hall). 4810 HILLTOP LA - 4904 RIDGE PL i X X X 3 1 2 X X X X X 4905 RIDGE PL 1 X X X % X X X X Virtually all the unsafe traffic conditions are caused by speeding residents and school buses and undisciplined children. Residents should abstain from speeding and be more responsible for their own children. Traffic calming devices are not a subatibae for consideration and responsibility. To pay for such devices is absurd. The storm drain at E. Sunnyslope 8 Dale was addressed just 2 years ago. Why redo It now! Does it have to do with flood Insurance? what assurances do we have against cost over -run? These streets tasted 60 years w/o curb or gutters. Lets go another 60 4908 RIDGE PL - 4912 RIDGE PL t X X X X 2 3 1 X X X X X Letter attached. 4800 SUNNYSLOPE RD E 4801 SUNNYSLOPE RD E 1 X X X X. 2 3 1 X X X X Wes to nicer steetllohts, but no to more lights at mid-block. 4804 SUNNYSLOPE RD E 1 X X X 1 X X X X 'Would need further information. 4805 SUNNYSLOPE RD E - 4808 SUNNYSLOPE RD E 1 X X X X. 2 3 1 X X•' X X 'Can we see a prim of where steetlighs would be added? "Some problems win speeding. We have been told that s humps are w no 4809 SUNNYSLOPE RD E 4901 SUNNYSLOPE RD E 1 X X X 1 X X X X X• Surmyslope was set up as a country community. Lets not run our look. Ag04 SUNNYSLOPE RD E 1 X X X X 2 3 1 X X X X X' I believe a round -about would be a traffic hazard and unneecessary. h is difficult o pull out on 50th so I'd lice a light at the Surmyslope enut. 4905 SUNNYSLOPE RD E 1 X X X X 2 3 1 X X X X X 4907 SUNNYSLOPE RD E 1 X X X X 1 % X X X X Of these Issues, I am most passionate about the sidewalks and the street lighting. We have such a wonderful n'hood, but It doesn7look as nice as It should. Sidewalks and lights would really make It a much more beautiful and pedestraln- friendly area. It would also aide in the safety of our families as there would be somewhere to walk out of the stee. 4908 SUNNYSLOPE RD E 1 X X X X 1 X X X •' 'Somewhat; "Unsure; but we support our neighbor who want that - measures to reduce speed of cars. 4909 SUNNYSLOPE RD E 1 X X X X 1 %' X" X X X 'For the good of our n'bors; "Sound does not affect us. Please see detailed map of the n'hood. We have made 3 suggeslons that may apply well to the situation. We do not favor tlreallC, costly measures to the situatidn, but ranter a wry stra' ht forward, simple Ian. Than 4913 SUNNYSLOPE RD E 1 X X X 2 2 1 X X X X•• 'Depends on cost. "Except or possibly speed bumps. We are most definitely opposed to the traffic circle concept. 4916 SUNNYSLOPE RD E 1 X X X X 1 X X X X X 4917 SUNNYSLOPE RD E t X X X 1 X' X X" X X The wall near Hwy 100 would benefit some properties. However, it doesnot benefit our property at all. The speed - bumps or expemally turnabouts would be a hindrance. This would be a waste of funds. We havenl desired curb b gutter since moving here 10.5 years ago. However, trucks have hacked out about 12 -18' of lawn causing an ugly appearance. We now feel It would be beneficial. 4920 SUNNYSLOPE RD E 1 X X X X 1 X X % I X X 4921 SUNNYSLOPE RD E 4924 SUNNYSLOPE RD E t % X X. X 1 X X X X X 'I would rather spend money on this over everything else. Would prioritize the burying overhead utlty Ines over all expendiftires. 4825 SUNNYSLOPE RD E 1 % X X X 1 X X X X X 4928 SUNNYSLOPE RD E 4929 SUNNYSLOPE RD E 4933 4800 SUNNYSLOPE RD E SUNNYSLOPE RD W 1 1 X X X X X 1 X X X X X Need to find a way to slow two on 50th at Sunn De intersection. Evervone s. Very da emus. X X 2 1 3 X X X X X 'Our utiities are underground. We will look onward to have you make this area look very speciall 4801 ISLINNYSLOPE RD W 4804 SUNNYSLOPE RD W t X X X X' X X X X X A new lights should be downwards-facing to reduce IqM pollution. We believe that our steels should be re- surfaced and that traffic circles should be Installed. We also would lice to see all street lights (cunent and any new Installation) shielded and downward -directed to reduce light pollution. Thank you or the opportunity to respond to tCIs survey. snns3m A3/wns 9ZS-V8 MAIDUM 1/321 SANNns %49 Not %98 %EL %s9 %6Z %z9 %lE %9E %OS %LE %E9 %ZS %Z4 %BE %Z9 %99 %SL %OL nS pewrWHjo % 9Z OZ 9Y L ►E SL ZE 9L 9L 9Z LSL 99'L 90'Z 6, EE LZ zZ OZ ZZ fiZ EL Z9 4L S1N3WW00 oN s3A ON I m r oN SaA oN saA oN saA seaeeYlM as"Ov O/M el S aN OaA ON eaA 1NnOWS OV3H -8 ON BOA olwaS Was O,A, OlMwl+Olwd eM.A.Wis mON+elwd anS9 Aeles OHlwl PGAIUMOd IleapunaS telwd ely laeliS aNlwoaaO saywd eaWJolaM Aumn JOWd Asung q gln0 taJwd pawmaM s mng Igol 6ZriZ'l vs.i, s►0'Z as AVM 11IH000M 918► X X X X X L Z E % X X L AVMTIHGOOM E19► poot,u sltl sayew yutp am leap SLqLp su0'pooLLu mo g qlm W odAi Aue cc POSOd o Oqs we I pue puegsny Wy % X X x L l A M 111 0 M zist eta g SILO aPnpg aseald arm pls e sl p'ansq ea gLmuoo a lOu sI sltl'adolsAwnS 3 4 Lp09lo ale0 y 4wi; Atp le I49ldais a (Aaleladsop) Pmu OM X X X X X L X X X L AVM TIHOOOM 909► (j0 oleo Or 14811 m) qnp AqunoO pue wed AOpn o1 oB Oa BhgS spy lol edwuunS'3le 1481IdOIs o4l pinoM 'nMm g Alepodso swnseaw Bgwlea aJleq ppe m snoialluep swaas p'pooy,u alg agwm sagpg deep OI Ono X % X X X L E Z X X X X L AVM lllH000M 408► ,odorAuunS,3 uo Llnos Btqllmeil uaLVA ugpesellg leN W euo pue pow odopntuunS '3 4 oleo wo4m Ouo - uW019 a asn pnm lew sewe Orq Ole weyl X X X X % L E Z X X X X L AVM TIHOOOM LO9► % I % X X X X X X L AVMTIHOOOM 008► AVM TIIH000M SOL► M ON 3dOlSANNns 6ZBY X X X X X L X X X L M ON 3dOlSANNnS SZ64 MOM UOlSANNnS LZ6► MOM 3dOlSANNnS OZ84 lwxwp slsm aye y oI 1 X X X X X L X X X l M ON 3dOlSANNnS LL6Y w sits way Wwd lou pnoys Ap o111 6s7 mm Bypuoq slip eta Rahn anoge %z sl leap so vamw. ue 10 pollaw wewssass7' eta sl AqM X X X X % Z L E X X X % L M OM 3dOlSANNns 9I6Y MGM 3dOlSANNns E189 'pooL,u mo g ayl s/apaods eL1lo lsau Nelewyolun'adoryWunS'3 Buole Due 19LPOOM 4 OIBO l0 top*aslepg eLl R papaeu ale Aet L ,sdwnq ponds o/m pmedal pew Jno peM lou pnom 1 'saopoods u.0p "s p asneaaq spew Adwng alai 1 Lwa1 ue uo Aauow Buplaw Ap aN sl AqM Loa anuanw sits SOOP waLM "M e sl oW aswelg Bgpuoq wp lano %Z m aBaeta cq Win osle I'pOoq,u eta to eouelgwe eya ww/ Aeme ayel spina ygL1 I X % X X X Z L E X X X % L M ON 3dO- lSANNns ZL64 'IS 1105 Oa uo wIq pal a ayew cq y ol'a of uunS'310 Oleo 9 tlO91e 1441 3JA4 esn pnoo. .X % X X X L X X X X L M ON 3dOISANNnS 6064 'PaLaepe Ja1W1 X X X X X X X X L M ON UOlSANNnS 906Y M ON 3dOlSANNLIS 9066 MOM UCIISANNnS YO6Y M OM 3dOlSANNnS mir 'asnW w lol Ilen+lOONW a lol woo llnl e W INa eq pnoM X X X X X L X X X X l M ON 3dOlSANNns 006► 'ulalgoad stl alanal[e pnow soue4ua a uunS legpe le lL .I V'sI spylq W ameaaq suapa>ip Laoq ass of Ne4 Aran sl tl "win 9a1 a Bulyew puE Oleos of uo Bugpra sl poay,u lno x; onsa Aoprs poMq aql X x X X L % X X X L MOM 3dOlSANNnS 9E8► MOM 3dOlSANNnS ZE9Y tuo avow alsem cq Oslo ,Lpwm p ygtl n Pet) lI A Od» _GOOM. X X X X .J( X .X L M ON 3dOlSANNnS uzur X X X Z L E X % X 1 MOM 3dOlSANNnS ►Z9Y X X % X 1 X X % L M ON 3dOlSANNns "aY X X X X L X X X X L M GM 3dOlSANNnS Ret M GM 3dOlSANNns "op tslu8wnWW g PW41OLPe Iou p sism —La lq alglsuOdsw A Oyln alewpsa S mOtABua Paaa'a Ism Iernm A X qxqx X X X L E Z X X X X l M ON 3dOlSANNnS ELB► 'leaL9ta ue lq Nope}sles sanssl eta puatw win pop I asnooaq Wa Ue W w leap IOU We 1 X X X X X L M OM 3dOlSANNns ZLBY X X X X L MOM 3dOlSANNns 6099 'sat 1011I'm - gene sso99e L 'LIDS of yaalo eteLl w wwl lleMpunes a lo) ageBo possa— aq aM pnoM ,Ww0 et q n imo IleMpunOs atl1W passasse Bgaq AP-18 we eM X X I % T. X L M ON 3dOlSANNns 909► S1N3WWO3 ON -A ON -A rwsr-+1 umv Pwra ON saA IM oN saA ON aaA WSOSWIM asOSSV O/M am � ON aaA ON saA 1Nno OV3LF9 ON aaA NnS 133ML3 'ON OMINIVO �I I I S)IWM301S M3N I A13dV5 I TIVMONnoS I 544on law!$ -- imaeaG I.IWJUI.kl ARIVIn I S gln0 Pauolwd I PaulmalJ snns3m A3/wns 9ZS-V8 MAIDUM 1/321 SANNns The way that the approval process has transpired regarding the sound barrier project on highway 100 north of 5CP is disturbing. To my knowledge there is one remaining section of sound wall on the east side of highway 100 north of 50 to be completed that has been halted in the court of public opinion. If the final portion of the sound wall project is not completed, the effectiveness of the wall north of the creek will be compromised and the homeowners south of the creek and north of 50`h will be left without a sound wall to reduce current sound levels that are well beyond State noise guidelines and on the rise. I was not informed of the public meeting to discuss the sound wall issue but happened to see it on cable television. The council made the decision to table the completion of the final section of the sound wall project due to a few neighbor's opposition to the project based on the basis their out of pocket expense to pay for the wall over a period of time. The sound barrier decision is not a matter of public opinion but of public welfare. The public is not fully apprised of all the issues surrounding this decision but the city engineers and officials do and are charged to act in the public's best interest. One significant issue that will dramatically increase the traffic noise is the increased traffic and the resulting noise in our neighborhood as a result of the upgrades to highway 100 north of 394 soon to be completed. If the entire sound barrier project north of 50'h was presented and handled as one project, this section of the hwy 100 corridor noise reduction would be completed and fully functional for ALL concerned. One council member stated at the meeting that he was voting against approval knowing that approval was the right thing to do. I don't appreciate city officials making decisions based who is making the loudest noise in voicing their personal agenda. I will say it again; this decision is an issue of public welfare not acquiescing to a few neighbors who are willing to voice their opinion at a meeting to accomplish their personal agenda p 1492011 "4916 1 491 4904 [Door ° "��9 4� 4911 4917 4913 4909 490? 4901 4924 49?A 49e116 a91z 4908 4929 Btopen 4809 4805 l�oe 4801 4920. Ridge Place 4905 t 4828�oo Aoi� Feria Kyn 4933 4gsg 4905 4921 4®17 4913 4909 d" _ V g DAVID E. LUNDSTROM 4912 RIDGE PLACE EDINA. MN 55424 TELEPHONE (952) 926 -8810 Saturday, December 4, 2004 Mr. Steven L. Lillehaug Edina City Hall 4801 West 50'h Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Dear Mr. Lillehaug: I attended the public information meeting held on November 9, 2004, and I have been reviewing the Survey and Comment Sheet recently mailed to all Sunnyslope residents. The issues involved are serious enough so that I need more comment space than provided on the back of the survey. I moved into my house on Ridge Place April 1, 1965, so I will soon be a 40 -year resident. I have never felt deprived by the absence of curbs and gutters, sidewalks, or additional street lights in all those years. Sunnyslope is a delightful area in which to live, less urbanized than the Country Club area, with more rolling terrain, larger and irregular shaped lots, many mature trees, and a more casual semi -rural appearance. I like it that way. Necessary repairs to water and sewer lines and resurfacing of the streets are all well and good and should be opposed by no one; we all want sound, pot- hole -free streets. But "If it ain't broke, don't fix it," remains a sound motto. I recently watched the resurfacing of west 50`h street south of Sunnyslope. It was done in a few days with minimal disruption of traffic. Why could not a similar process be applied to the Sunnyslope streets without making a summer -long mess? I have invited old friends from the east coast to be my house guests this summer, and the last thing I want to show them is a neighborhood torn up by heavy machinery. Burying utility lines is an idea that sounds attractive, but I question whether it is worth the cost and the mess that would result. Trenching machines would excavate along the back of established lots, tearing up gardens and tree roots and causing at least a short interruption of power. My electric and telephone lines come underground from the power poles, so the change would not be a problem for me, but remember that with no power poles everyone would have to have their power lines, telephone lines and TV cables buried, and would have to have a hole punched in their basement walls below ground level for entry of the lines. If we had suffered a wind storm that knocked down trees and power poles, I would support rebuilding with underground utilities. To change the perfectly acceptable power distribution system that has served the neighborhood since the late 1940's just for aesthetics would not seem good sense. Currently we have street lights at all street intersections. What purpose would be served by adding additional lamp posts between intersections? The one improvement that could be justified by conditions that have changed since the Sunnyslope area was developed is the sound barrier at highway 100. The highway has been widened from two lanes to three in each direction and traffic is much heavier than years ago. A barrier would benefit West Sunnyslope residents especially, but when the wind is from the west the traffic noise is evident to others as well. Thanks to Minnehaha Creek, Sunnyslope has no through traffic Any "traffic calming in s-) therefore would be directed at residents coming and going and the occasional d9livery truck. Because the most remote house in Sunnyslope is no more than three blocks from 50th street, a posted speed limit of 25 or even 20 miles per hour would be reasonable. If an Edina poligeman. were to give only two or three tickets to speeders, the message would spread through the neighborhood like gossip, and any traffic problem would be solved. This makes far more sense than penalizing the majority of residents with speed bumps, traffic circles, and such nonsense. I hope these thoughts from a long time resident have been helpful. Very truly yours, P D EE. Lundstrom Steve Lillehaug From: Cathy Mitchell [cmitche116 @mn.rr.com] Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004 6:51 PM To: Steve Lillehaug; Wayne D. Houle Subject: Sunnyslope Project Dear Mr. Houle, Thank you for leading an informative meeting at the Edina City hall last Tuesday evening. I am pleased that the city of Edina works hard to keep in touch with the residents and seeks input form ,the residents. As my husband and I mentioned last Tuesday, we are most concerned about the difficulty we experience trying to enter onto 50th Street from either East Sunnyslope of Dale Drive. This safety issue is far and away our biggest concern with respect to our neighborhood. Occasionally during our casual conversations with other neighborhood residents we have asked them if this is lack of a street light is a concern to them. Our neighbors have always emphatically responded, "YES." I sincerely hope it will be possible to provide our neighborhood with a stop light at either East Sunnyslope or at Dale Drive within the next year or so. I honestly believe this is a pressing safety issue. I think that if you or your colleagues were to attempt to exit our neighborhood onto 50th Street during rush hour ( turning left is nearly impossible) you would experience what we face on a daily basis. My second highest priority for our neighborhood concerns noise abatement. I was surprised to learn that you thought there was little interest in this issue among our residents. My feeling is that the Sunnyslope neighborhood residents are indeed interested in noise abatement. I hope this issue can be further explored at our next meeting. A third concern of mine is that the economical benefits to residents in our neighborhood match the economical costs to those same residents. If a neighborhood improvement will significantly improve the value of afew homes in our neighborhood, then the residents who reap the benefit from the neighborhood improvement should be the ones to substantially pay the cost of that improvement. From what I heard at the Tuesday evening meeting, I was not certain that this will be true for the Sunnyslope project. Fourthly, I am in favor of more appealing lighting in our neighborhood. I was, however, disappointed that you say there will not be an increase in lighting but simply an upgrading of existing lighting. I think our neighborhood is very dark. I would be in favor of additional lighting for our neighborhood. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, Catherine Mitchell 4808 Woodhill Way 11/16/2004 0 City of Edina October 29, 2004 t Sunnyslope Area Resid nts Edina, Minnesota RE: Resident Letter No. 1 Informational Meeting Announcement' East & West Sunnyslope Rd, Woodhill Way, Ridge PI, Dale Dr & Hilltop Ln City of Edina, Improvement No. BA-326 Dear Resident: 4 LLs The City of Edina has initiated the process for roadway and utility improvements for your neighborhood. See attached location map. We are hosting an Informational Meeting regarding this project to be held on Tuesday, November 9t', from 6:00 to 7:30 p.m., in the Edina City Council Chambers located at 4801 W. 50°i Street. (The Council Chambers is immediately to your left as you enter City Hall.) The meeting format will consist of a short presentation followed by an informal question and answer session. The presentation will cover scope of work and average assessment costs. If you are unable to attend, information regarding this project will be available after this meeting. Sincerely, 3VV9;VUA -'') Steve L. Lillehaug Edina Traffic Engineer/ Assistant Engineer City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com 952 - 927 -861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 Thank you for your input into the street upgrades, neighborhood directory, and the block party. There were many good suggestions to improve our neighborhood and make it more unique. The results and comments are noted below. Wayne Houle, the Director of Public Works of the City of Edina described the process of upgrading the streets. If you have questions, please contact him at 952- 826 -0443 or whoule@ci.edina.mn.us. The next steps include; 1) June or July: City Council vote to authorize a feasibility study 2) Summer: Feasibility study completed 3) September: Informational meeting for residents 4) October: Public Hearing in about October 5) November: Plan finalized 6) Winter: Bids requested for completion 7) Spring: Begin construction Survey Results (51 of 72 houses responding) Yes ( %) No ( %) No Answer ( %) 6/22/03 r .35(70%) 9(16%) •1 7 � �+ F Street Upgrade Update 14(27%) Thank you for your input into the street upgrades, neighborhood directory, and the block party. There were many good suggestions to improve our neighborhood and make it more unique. The results and comments are noted below. Wayne Houle, the Director of Public Works of the City of Edina described the process of upgrading the streets. If you have questions, please contact him at 952- 826 -0443 or whoule@ci.edina.mn.us. The next steps include; 1) June or July: City Council vote to authorize a feasibility study 2) Summer: Feasibility study completed 3) September: Informational meeting for residents 4) October: Public Hearing in about October 5) November: Plan finalized 6) Winter: Bids requested for completion 7) Spring: Begin construction Survey Results (51 of 72 houses responding) Yes ( %) No ( %) No Answer ( %) Are you interested in having the streets upgraded? .35(70%) 9(16%) 7(14%) Permanent street surfacing 31(62%) 6(9%) 14(27%) (to removing current surface and replace) Increase lighting on the streets 24(48%) 16(30%) 11(22%) (to improve safety and visibility at night) Correct storm sewer drainage problems 29(58 %) 7(12%) 15(30%) (to prevent flooding) Roundabouts. on Dale to reduce traffic speed 18(36 %) 17(32%) 16(32%) (to improve safety and beauty) Curb and gutter in front of your house 13(26%) 2406%). 14(28%) (optional to prevent erosion during heavy rains) Improve sidewalk on 50'h street 19(38 %) 17(32%) 15(30%) (paid by county to improve safety) Comments (with # of residents who made similar comments): No curbs and gutters. The neighborhood would lose the unique country look and attractiveness. (6) Repair the " Sunnyssope" stone entries. (6) Remove them. (1) Signals at Dale or Sunnsylope and 50'h. Many serious accidents have occurred there. (4) Improvements are needed now to retrain property values. (3) Sidewalk on 50'h street is too close to 50'h st traffic and dangerous for pedestrians. County should pay.(3) Neighborhood garage sale would be good. (3) Clean up shoreline on creek. Put a dock in for the. neighborhood. (3) The holiday gathering is fun.(2) We need a sound wall on Hwy 100. (2) Efforts to reduce traffic speed should be made (roundabouts, post speed limit) (3) Remove buckthorn. (1) Enforce rules about no boats/trailers /dead cars in driveway.(1) Buddy system for barking dogs. (1) Interest in book club, gourmet club, progressive dinners, or bridge club (2) List babysitters in directory. (1) Page 1 of 1 Steve Lillehaug From: Vogllaw @aol.com Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 4:53 PM To: Steve Lillehaug Subject: Re: Sunnyslope Project Thank you for your response. I live on the Hwy 100 side of Sunnyslope. I wanted to spend money on a sound wall since I thought it would increase the value of all of our homes. Most people didn't want to spend the money so I was ok with that. Now we are going to spend exorbitant amounts on curbs and gutters? I don't see how that improves the value of our homes and I am against it. I like the look of our roads. I think a few bumps here and there act like natural speed bumps for some of my neighbors that drive too fast and frankly at least on my end of the street the road is not well traveled therefore it lasts a lot longer than other areas. As a matter of fact, the only repairs to our end of Sunnyslope in my 13 years here have been due to sewer work, home construction and water pipe damage. As far as other areas, 20% sounds like a low number to me. If you drive around Highlands, Rolling Green, Indian Hills you will see lots of roads without curbs. I'll see you at the meeting. W. James Vogl Attorney at Law Vogl Law Firm PO Box 24858 Edina, MN 55424 Phone No. (952)926 -4670 Fax No. (952) 285 -5715 Vogllaw @aol.com This transmission is intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately. 2/7/2005 Page 1 of 2 Steve Lillehaug From: Steve Lillehaug Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 4:29 PM To: 'Vogllaw @aol.com'. Cc: Steve Lillehaug Subject: RE: Sunnyslope Project Thank you for your e-mail Mr. Vogl. I will pass your comments on to the City Council for consideration. There has been no decision made. Staff doesn't make the decisions. We make recommendations to your City Council who are the final authority and decision makers. This is the reason for the Public Hearing scheduled for February 15. I hope you attend. A recent figure we compiled is that less than 20% of the roadways in Edina still remain without curb and gutter. As I stated in the information letter, curb and gutter does extend the life of the road as well as address certain drainage problems throughout your neighborhood, etc. Installing curb and gutter both from an engineering point of view and fiscally is the prudent recommendation over the life of a roadway. reported the survey numbers as they are - 25% of the returned surveys favored curb and gutter, 56% were opposed - maybe I could have added that the balance didn't indicate yes or no). One could contend that if I used your method that I would be trying to skew it the other direction. I simply reported the numbers as they stand. Absolutely staff is not proceeding with any project to "make money ". Rather, the opposite - moving.forward with the roadway and utility construction projects requires more dollars not only from assessment but also from the City's utility funds and possibly general levy. The City's policy has been 2 points over the rate - not 3. This project originated from requests from you neighbors. Yes, staff expanded on the request as part of the planning to reconstruct the City's infrastructure as a whole and not just segment by segment based on petitions (part of being proactive to address a concerning problem). You are also correct - the need to fill potholes in Edina is increasing - thus, increasing the funding for potholing would also increase (exponentially if we took the "do nothing" approach). This "do- nothing" approach would absolutely not be the responsible approach to take as a professional engineer who is managing a City's infrastructure. I understand the significance of the individual cost of the project. If this were lower, many more would more than likely support the project (including curb and gutter). This is why your Council is reevaluating the current 100% assessment policy. Please contact me with any further questions or comments. I hope to see you on the 15th. Steve Steven L. Liiiehaug, P.E., P.T.O.E. Edina Traffic Engineer /Assistant Engineer Engineering Department 952 - 826 -0445 slillehaug @ci.edina.mn.us City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com (fax) 952. 826 -0389 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Vogllaw @aol.com (mailto:Vogllaw @aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 3:44 PM To: Steve Lillehaug Subject: Sunnyslope Project 2/7/2005 Page 2 of 2 Mr. Lillehaug: Is this a final decision? Can we neighbors stop this project? I have been a resident of this neighborhood for almost 13 years. I am disappointed that you are recommending curbs and gutters for this neighborhood. Many neighborhoods in Edina do not have curbs and gutters such as Indian Hills, Rolling Green, etc. Are you going to force curbs and gutters on them too? I'm also disappointed that you put the percentage against curbs and gutters at 56% when its deceiving since the more telling number is that by a more than 2 -1 margin residents stated they didn't want gutters. Yet your office is going to push this project through, which will cost us $15,000 plus interest over 10 years. Either you are doing this to make money on our assessment (if I remember correctly 3% over the rate that Edina is charged) or you don't want to pay to fill a few potholes each year. As far as curbs and gutters extending the life of the road I believe it is crazy. The life of the road has to do with traffic density. I live on a dead end and the road is just fine and even as one of your engineers stated to me it has some life left. This neighborhood has been here since 1940 without gutters. In my 13 years here they have wanted to repave the road in front of my house a few times. It was voted down and you know what the road is just fine. No one on this part of West Sunnyslope has complained and we don't believe curbs and gutters do anything. W. James Vogl Attorney at Law Vogl Law Firm PO Box 24858 Edina, MN 55424 Phone No. (952)926 -4670 Fax No. (952) 285 -5715 Vogllaw @aol.com This transmission is intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately. 2/7/2005 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL Sunnyslope Neighborhood Roadway Improvement No. BA-326 CITY OF EDINA STREET PID 0 LEGAL STREET NO. OWNER ASSESSABLE LOTS LOT BLOCK LOT LOTS ASSESSMENT COST A Dale Or 18-028 -2432 -0019 8 5 4928 Lebarron, Steven 8 Kathleen 1 $ 16,794.52 18-028 -2432 -0018 7 5 4924 Aadalen Richard 8 Susan 1 $ 18 794.62 18-028 -24 -23 -0035 1 6 6 4920 Mccorrnick Michael 8 Kellick Donna 1 $ 16 794.52 18-028 -24- 23-0034 5 5 4916 Nelson O 8 Helen 1 $ 18 794.52 18-028 - 2432 -0017 9 4 4929 Schell Jr James 8 Lynn 1 $ 16,7G4.52 18-028-24-23-0027 2 4 4913 Pederson Thomas 8 Barbara 1 $ 18 794.52 18-028. 2423-0015 4 2 4700 Fricton James 8 Arancio Delia 1 $ 18 794.52 Hilltop Ln 18-028 -24-32 -0014 6 4 4801 Rice, Bernard 8 Edith 1 $ 16,794.52 18-028 - 2432 -0016 7 4 4806 Rice Bernard 8 Edith 1 $ 18 794.62 18-028 - 2432 -0018 8 4 4809 Brogan, Bernard 8 Joan 1$ 16 794.52 18-028 - 2432 -0028 t2 4810 Finlay, Raymond 8 Ma 1 $ 18 794.52 Ridge PI 18-028 -24- 23-0016 5 2 4906 Widtfeldt, James 8 Anne 1 $ 16,794.62 18 -028 -24 -23 -0033 4 5 4912 Lundstrom David 1 $ 16,794.62 18 -028 -24 -23 -0032 3 5 4908 Taylor,-John 8 Margaret 1 $ 18 794.52 18-028- 2423 -0031 2 5 4904 Haakenson Peter 8 Heather 1 $ 18 794.52 Sunnyslope Rd E 18-02824 -22 -0087 3 6 4801 Lehmann, Dan 8 Roxane 1 $ 16,794.62 18-028 -24 -22 -0085 2 8 ptl 6 4806 Johnson Mary 1 $ 18 794.52 18-028 - 2423-0019 2 3 4901 Hau land Dou las 8 Jacqueline 1 $ 18 794.52 18 -028 -24- 23-0061 1 1 4905 Schmoker, William 8 Cindy 1 $ 18 794.62 18-028 - 2423-0062 2 1 4907 O'Grady. Shawn 8 Rebecca 1 $ 16,75W -52 18-028 - 2423-0020 4 3 4909 Reiman III John 8 Alice 1 $ 18 794.62 18-028 - 2423-0021 6 3 4913 Hagman, Mark 8 Ja cqueline 1 $ 18 794.62 18-028 - 2423-0022 e 3 4917 Goblirsch David 8 Marie 1 $ 18 794.52 18-028 - 2423-0023 7 3 4921 Steuer, Lorell 1 $ 16 794.52 18-028 - 2423-0024 8 31 4926 Kvam John 8 D 1 $ 18 794.52 18-028 -24- 23-0026 1 9 3 4929 Faris AndrewBHeidi 1 $ 18794.62 18. 028 - 2431 -0002 4933 Holtz, Lawrence 8 Cynthia 1 $ 16,794.52 18-028 - 2432 -0013 6 4 4928 Katz Mark 8 Evelyn 1 $ 18 794.52 18-028 - 2432 -0012 4 4 4924 En ler David 8 Linda 1 $ 18 794.52 18-028-2432 -0011 3 4 4920 Marshall Robert 8 Mari 1 $ 18 794.52 18-028- 24- 23-002e 1 4 4916 Flynn, Patrick 8 LLsa 1 $ 18 794.62 18 -028 -24- 23-0014 3 2 4908 Moskalik Randy 8 Jean 1 $ 16.7 .62 18-028. 2423-0013 2 2 4904 Carlson Diane 1 18 794.62 18-028 - 2423-0002 3 1 4808 Bailey, William 8 Katharine 1 $ 16 794.62 18-028.24- 22-0082 2 1 4804 Westenbe Robert 8 Linda 1 $ 16 794.62 18-028 - 242-0081 1 1 4800 Aslesen Brian 8 Sara 1 5 18 794.52 Sunnyslope Rd W 16-028 - 2422-0088 4 6 4800 Cousins, Daniel 8 Eve 1 $ 16,794.52 18- 028 - 2422-0089 5 6 4804 Carron Reid 8 Rom Rebecca 1 $ 18 794.52 18-028 - 2422-0090 6 6 4808 Gustafson Bruce 8 Olson Cynthia 1 $ 16 794.62 18-028 - 2422 -0091 7 8 t8 61 4812 Burger, Gloria 1 $ 16,794.52 18-028 - 2423-0042 Pis 8 9 6 4820 Stroh Benedict 8 Kathleen 1 $ 18 794.52 18-028 - 2423-0043 10 6 4824 Miller Susan 8 Leslie 1 $ 18 794.62 18-028 - 2423-0044 11 6 4828 Christy, Jack 8 Bonnei h 1 $ 16 794.52 18-028 - 2423-0046 12 6 4832 Henenes. Gary 8 Barbara 1 $ 18 794.52 18-028 - 24234)048 13 6 4836 Hogan, Ted 8 Krisanne 1 $ 16 794.62 18-028 - 2423 -0047 14 6 4900 Doster, Henry 8 Wen 1 $ 18 794.52 18-028. 2423-0048 15 6 4904 Hue Robert 8 Diane 1 $ 18 794.52 18-028 - 2423-0049 16 6 4908 Peterson Mark 1 16 794.52 18. 028 - 2423-0054 17 t1 8 02 b15 6 4912 Vool Jr Wiliam 8 Lod 1 $ 18 794.52 18-028 - 2423-0053 Pt 1 12 t17 8 PUB 61 4916 Makredes Ste en 8 Ann 1 $ 18 794.52 18028 - 2432 -0022 19 8 t18 6 4920 Danielson 1 $ 18 794.62 18-028 - 2432-0020 9 5 4929 Curtis John 1 $ 18 794.52 18-0282432-0021 10 5 4926 Duffey, John 8 Karl 1 $ 16 794.62 18.0282423-0036 11 6 4921 Dalldorf, Mary 1 $ 18 794.52 18-02824- 23-0037 12 5 4917 Eriksson Mark 8 Christina 1 $ 18 794.52 18028- 2423-0038 13 5 4913 Zino John 8 Marva 1 $ 16 794.62 18- 0282423-0039 14 6 4909 Mertes John 1 $ 18 794.62 18-0282423-0040 16 51 4905 Horns, Dorothy 1 $ 16,794.52 18- 02827- 23-0041 16 5 4901 Nagy, Stephen 1 $ 18 794.62 180282423-0008 9 1 4821 Stanton, James 8 Makredis, Sue 1 $ 16,794.62 18-0282423-0009 10 1 4817 Firth Sr, Robert 8 Alva 1 $ 18,794.62 18-0282423-0010 11 1 4813 Gudmundsson, Olafur 8 Rudrud, Sal 1 $ - 18,794.62 18- 028. 2423-0011 1 12 1 4809 Schab, Robert 8 Beth 1 $ 16,794.52 18-028.24- 224)083 13 1 4805 Wdd3M, Paul 8 Lana 1 $ 16,794.62 18-02824- 22-0084 4 1 4801 Rosman, Jan 1 $ 16,794.62 Woodhlll Way 18-0282423-0003 4 8 pt5 1 48W Conner, Thomas 8 Cynthia 1 $ 18,794.52 18-0282423-0004 5 1 4804 Shirley, David 8 Shelley 1 $ 18,794.62 18-028-24-234)006, 6 1 4808 Mitchell, James 8 Catherine 1 $ 18,794.62 18-0282423-0006 7 1 4812 Jasper, Joseph 8 Kelly 1 $ 16,794.52 18-02824234=7 8 1 4816 Kronfeld Mervin 1 $ 18 794.62 18-0282423-0030 1 5 4813 Slocum, Stanley 8 Lucille 1 $ 16,794.52 18-0282423-0017 8 2 4705 Briden, Hazel 1 $ 18,794.52 18- 0282423-0012 1 2 4801 Ginkel, EMrood 8 Dolly 1 $ 16,794.62 73 1,228,000.00 TOTAL PROJECT COST (Roadway and lighting) $ 1,228,000.00 AVERAGE COST PER LOT $ 16,794.62 8um"ope Rd Asm-m oAs Page 1 6:18 PA2/7/2006 JACK RICE 4801 HILLTOP LANE EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 qSL. (4n) 927 -8372 February 9, 2005 Mr. Steve Lillehaug c/o Engineering Department 4801 West 50`h Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Steve, I regret that Ede and I will not be able to attend the Public Hearing on February 15`h re the proposal improvements to the Sunnyslope Neighborhood. Please pass on to the Council that we as owners of 4801 and 4805 Hilltop Lane are in favor of the project as recommended by staff. Also you should know that we anticipate new construction on the 4805 lot sometime in the next year. Thank you w�- Ja k Rice Agenda Item #II.B. February 10, 2005 To: James Hovland, Mayor of Edina Scot Housh , City Council Member Linda Masica, City Council Member Ann Swenson, City Council Member ✓ Scott Lillehaug, City of Edina Traffic Engineer From: Jean and Randy Moskalik 4908 E. Sunnyslope Rd Edina MN 55424 Subject: Street Improvements and Special Assessments in the Sunnyslope neighborhood This letter is to provide input into the decision making process for the street improvements in the Sunnyslope neighborhood where we live. These improvements are estimated to be $16,800 for our house, according to the letter we received. We were surprised how costly these improvements are for our modest little house, and we hope the amount can be reduced. This letter is to recommend the following two changes: 1. Eliminate concrete curb and gutter. We think curb and gutter would change the small -town character of the neighborhood. Also, this particular improvement was voted down in the survey by the majority of the residents (56% to 25 %). 2. Add a specific provision that the 2005 improvements and special assessments will not be charged 100% to neighborhood homeowners, but instead would charged at whatever reduced percentage is approved later in the year by the City Council. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Jean and Randy Moskalik 952 - 929 -6439 / V rid | -----'- ---u-- '--�---------- -- � --- --- ----''' ___--'_4_�----------'-- -------- - ----�--- -' �- -- - --' �' To: Mayor & City Council From: Craig Larsen City Planner Date: February 15, 2005 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Subject: 2005 CDBG Community Block Grant Funds Recommendation: Agenda Item: Ill. A. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ Action: ❑ Approve recommended budget for submission to Hennepin County Information /Background: To HRA To Council Motion Resolution Ordinance Discussion Edina's 2005 CDBG entitlement is $172,355, a $1,202 increase from the $171,153 allocation in 2004. Although not a large increase, Edina is one of only two communities to experience an increase in funding; the remaining nine communities are experiencing decreases ranging from 3 % to 17% when compared to their 2004 allotments. The County's total budget from HUD is nearly 6% less than last year. The distribution of funds to. the communities is predicated upon population data updated to 2003. HUD regulations require that no more than 15% of the City's budget may be directed toward public service agencies- the remaining 85% must go toward community development projects. Requests for funding from the Public Services portion of the budget have been received from the same organizations Edina has funded in the past. Edina's Human Rights and Relations Commission has reviewed the proposed budget and agrees with the following recommendation: Public Services As in the past, funding for public services may not exceed 15% of the total budget. Edina's 2005 allotment for public services may not exceed $25,853. The public service agencies requesting a portion of the 2005 CDBG budget are: • Greater Minneapolis Daycare Association ( GMDCA) — providing daycare subsidies to income eligible families Senior Community Services (H.O.M.E. — Housing and Outdoor Maintenance for the Elderly) — providing housekeeping and chore services to Edina seniors who pay for services on a sliding fee scale Community Action for Suburban Hennepin (CASH) — provides housing programs for low and moderate income homeowners and homebuyers HOME Line — provides tenant advocacy services for Edina renters 2005 2004 2005 Proposed Agency Budget Request Budget GMDCA -. Daycare Subsidy $14,633 $ 8,000 $ 8,191 H.O.M.E - Sr. Comm. Services $ 9,089 $ 9,089 $ 9,280 CASH $ 975 $ 5,000 $ 4,191 HOME Line $ 975 $ 4,000 $ 4,191 TOTAL $25,672 $26,089 $25,853 Community Development After the $25,853 distribution for public services, $146,502 remains to be directed toward community development projects. Staff recommends to again fund the Rehabilitation of Private Property'and Scattered Site Affordable Housing programs. These two housing programs have successfully contributed to not only maintaining Edina 's housing stock, but also providing affordable housing opportunities to Edina residents. The Rehabilitation of Private Property program provides deferred repayment loans of up to $25,000 to make structural improvements to owner occupied single - family homes. Eligibility for the program is based on a household income schedule established by HUD for the Minneapolis /St. Paul area. The income limits may not exceed 80% of the median household income. Last year, four homeowners participated in the program. Staff anticipates assisting at least four more homeowners in the coming year. Since 1997, the Scattered Site Affordable Housing program has provided over $622,000 of funding for affordable housing programs either in the City of Edina or in neighboring communities providing benefit to Edina residents. To date, $85,481 from the 2004 budget must be spent by December 31, 2005; with the $80,000 proposed for the 2005 budget, Edina will have $165,481 set aside for scattered site affordable housing projects. Staff recommends the followi development purposes: Activity Rehabilitation of Private Property Scattered Site Affordable Housinc TOTAL: ng distribution of 2005 CDBG funds for community 2004 2005. Budget Proposal $ 60,000 $ 66;502 $ 85,481 $ 80,000 $145,481 $146,502 I ' Greater Minneapolis Day Care Association 1628 Elliot Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55404 tel:612- 341 -1177 fax: 612-341-4356 www.gmdca.org January 13, 2005 Ms. Donna Tilser City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Ms. Tilser: We are writing to apply for CDBG funds for the year 2005 from the City of Edina. We are requesting funds for the purpose of assisting families from your community with their child care costs. The families we serve represent low income families working toward self - sufficiency. The need for stable, reliable childcare while parents pursue their goals is vital to the well -being of families. Helping families to pay for the cost of that care will add to the strength of your community. As a result of State legislative action during the 2003 session, the past eighteen months have been full of new challenges for families in trying to meet their child care costs and maintain self - sufficiency. The legislature reduced the overall amount of funding available to Hennepin County for the last biennium by $2.3 million. This amount represents 18% of the resources available. The County added to that a reduction of $1.7 million. Parents have had hard choices to make. Some have left their jobs due to the changes, some have changed their care settings from licensed care to family, friend and neighbor caregivers and some have been forced to go onto public assistance. As a result some providers have seen their enrollment drop dramatically. Providers have faced a "freeze" in subsidy reimbursement levels. The current legislative session brings uncertainty as we face another staggering $1 billion dollar deficit and programs that serve low and moderate- income families will certainly be at risk. We are proposing to use these resources to cover 50% of the cost to parents for their co- payment. We are requesting that the City of Edina consider a $8,000 request for the year 2005. I look forward to meeting you at your scheduled hearing. I will plan to give you a call the week of February 1st to get the date and time. Should you have any questions, or need further information before that time, please give me a call at (612) 349 -0550. Thank you for allowing us this opportunity to apply. Sincerely, Carla Jacobs Community Support Department Manager M. Commvni {1 INSol�t��t+S �ond` member 2005 URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM REQUEST FOR FUNDING (Use one form per project) A. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. City of Edina, Minnesota 2. Project Name: Child Care Scholarship Fund Contact Person/ Phone No.: Carla Jacobson, (612) 349 -0550 B. PROJECT DATA CDBG Funding Requested (needs to be same as council resolution) $8,000 Is this an existing CDBG- funded project? XX Yes MNo Leveraged Funds: (What other public or private funds does project include? If none, indicate w /check here - None: Eb Amount: $5.84 million for fiscal year 2004. Anticipated to be $8 million for fiscal year 2005 Source: Federal Government, State of Minnesota, Hennepin County GMDCA administered an approximate total of $5.84 million for fiscal year 2004 and we anticipate that fiscal year 2005 will be about $8 million to meet the child care needs of low - income families. This money is committed by the Federal Government, State of Minnesota, and Hennepin County to help. low to moderate income families meet their child care costs. NOTE: Hennepin County as a whole received $22.6 million in basic sliding fee funding for calendar year 2004 to serve low and moderate income families. Historically, GMDCA has and continues to administer approximately 25% of the Basic Sliding Fee program in Hennepin County. 4. Project Location: Address: 1628 Elliot Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55404 Citywide: Services will be offered throughout the City of 5. Project Description: (Describe the project in as much detail as possible, including the local need(s) the project will address) GMDCA is requesting $8,000 for the City of Edina Child Care Scholarship Fund to serve families who are eligible for Child Care Assistance and have incomes between 100% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines and the HUD Section 8 Housing Guidelines. Nine suburban Hennepin County communities participate in this program. These communities are Crystal, Eden Prairie, Edina, Maple Grove, Minnetonka, New Hope, Plymouth, Richfield, and the Consolidated Pool. We also serve the City of Minneapolis. Prior to recruiting any additional families to the Child Care Scholarship Fund, GMDCA will work with families who are currently being served to transition them from the Parents Assistance Fund to the Child Care Scholarship Fund. 6. The steps involved to receive. services are: 1. Parents are referred to GMDCA or are recruited by GMDCA. Referrals often come from child care providers, community agencies, Hennepin County Health and Human Services Department, First Call for Help, or by word of mouth. We are also listed in the yellow pages. 2. Callers are screened for eligibility. Eligibility factors are: • Currently receiving child care assistance. • Income between 100% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines and the HUD Section 8 Housing Guidelines. This represents a family co-pay of at least $40.00 per month. • Using a family licensed provider or a licensed child care center • Both parents working an average of at least 20 hours per week or attending school with an approved Employability Plan. 3. As City CDBG funds become available, families on the list are contacted for services. Families supply wage and other income documentation to establish eligibility, as well as documentation verifying their provider choice and their current monthly co- payment obligation. 4. If found eligible, a scholarship of up to 6 months will be awarded. The amount of scholarship awarded will be 50% of the parents co-payment obligation. In December of 2004 the average monthly co-payment for a GMDCA Basic Sliding Fee Family was $155.00. As of January 2005, the average monthly scholarship per family eligible for the Child Care Scholarship has been $116.00 per month. 5. Family eligibility will be re- determined at least every six months. 6. Billing will be done by the licensed child care provider who will be paid directly by GMDCA. Providers will be encouraged to bill monthly. Consolidated Plan Priorities: (Note: If a proposed project is a low urban county priority, you must explain why it has a higher priority in your community.) Within the 3 simple goals that Congress has set forth for the CDBG program, the Hennepin County Five -Year Consolidated Plan (2005 -2009) states: Provide a Suitable Living Environment • Expand Economic Opportunities Under the Housing and Community Development Goals 2005 -2009, under Community Development, it indicates Family Services as a HIGH priority. Under Strategies it states, continue working with GMDCA to ensure that families have access to quality and affordable child care services. 7. Describe anticipated results /accomplishments the project will have. (number of persons/ households to be assistedlserved, number of housing units to be rehabilitated/built, etc.) Based upon past experience and the current average co-payment of $155.00. We know that because of the challenges.faced by low income families your support will likely mean that the families we serve may be able to maintain employment and housing, afford healthcare coverage or keep their children in stable, quality child care settings. These dollars may also impact the stability of child care businesses within your community. 8. Describe how project will assist the community in achieving your Livable Communities Act goals (if applicable) We do not believe this project would be applicable to the goals of the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act. 9. Implementation Schedule: (Identify major project tasks to occur during within the first 12 months of the 18 month expenditure period.) This program represents a unique approach to meeting the child care needs of low income families in your community. Since the changes at the State Legislature in 2003 we have monitored the impacts on families. Child Care Works, the state child care lobbying organization, has identified child care i assistance eligibility and co- payments their top legislative agenda priority. We believe by helping decrease those costs to families we will add to the overall stability of the family. Recruitment and eligibility determination for new families: July- September 2005 Family enrollment completed:, October 2005 Redetermination of families' eligibility completed: April 2006 Final spend down May 2006 Final billing June 2006 10. Budget: (Specify total project budget by major project component —Le; administration, planning, construction, acquisition, direct grants, public service.) COMPONENT BUDGET /SOURCE OF FUNDS CDBG Other (identify) $5.84 million Scholarship Funds s8,000 Project Totals . $7,200 $ Please note: The Hennepin County waiting list was eliminated in July 2004. IMPORTANT. Balances have been committed to families and will be spent on direct services providedthrough July 2005. Please note the number of families currently served, as well as the number ofapplications pending The family's child care provider bills GMDCA after the child care has been provided. The average monthly scholarship is $116 per family. +Compiled by GMDCA 01/2005 l j F:\DOCS %SUBSIDY( CDBG\CDBGRPT.DOC A # Unduplicated # Families # Applications Families Served # On County 2003 2004 Currently Served Pending 1/1/04 - 12/31/04 Waiting List Fund Bal. Fund Bal. Crystal 5 5 6 0 0 4,865.76 Eden Prairie 8 2 6 0 0 10,000.00 Edina 3 0 8 0 0 14,663.00 Golden Valley .0 0 2 0 0 2780.00 (Consolidated Pool) Maple Grove 10 4 8 0 0 9,585.94 Minnetonka 3 3 4 0 0 5,574.75 New Hope 7 0 6 0 0 4,608.35 Plymouth 7 3 6 0 0 9,239.19 Richfield 5 1 8 0 0 12,000.00 Please note: The Hennepin County waiting list was eliminated in July 2004. IMPORTANT. Balances have been committed to families and will be spent on direct services providedthrough July 2005. Please note the number of families currently served, as well as the number ofapplications pending The family's child care provider bills GMDCA after the child care has been provided. The average monthly scholarship is $116 per family. +Compiled by GMDCA 01/2005 l j F:\DOCS %SUBSIDY( CDBG\CDBGRPT.DOC A Greater Minneapolis Day Care Association 1628 Elliot Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55404 tel:612- 341 -1177 fax: 612-341-4356 www.gmdca.org January 25, 2005 Ms. Joyce Repya City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Ms. Repya: Enclosed is the update regarding CDBG activity to date for the 2004 -2005 contract year. I had intended to enclose this with our application. My apologies. If you have any questions on this information, please call Julie Danzel at (612) 349 -0535. I'd be glad to answer any questions you may have regarding the application. I can be reached at (612) 349 -0550. Sincerely, Carla Jacob Community Support Department Manager `ommuni {q So1.t1ony - rlvnd "_ member f SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES 10709 Wayzata Blvd., Suite 111, Minnetonka, MN 55305 -1529. Phone: (952) 541 -1019 FAX: (952) 541 -0841 E -mail: scs @seniorcommunity.org Website: www.senlorcommunity.org BOARD OF DIRECTORS Gordon Hughes January 14, 2005 President John Gray 1sr Vice President Ms Joyce Repya, City Planner Bob Bean City of Edina 2nd Vice President 4801 West 5& Street John Lawson Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Treasurer Marvin Johnson Dear Ms. Repya: Secretary Senior Community Services is requesting that the City of Edina John C. Boeder Past President allocate $9,089 from it's share of 2004 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds to support the HOME Program. This is Marty Guritz Member -at -Large the same level of funding provided in the current year. Enclosed is a Hennepin County Request for Funding application filled out to Gloria Johnson Member -at -Large facilitate our request. `avid F. Fisher Edina's CDBG funds will be leveraged from client fees, the United heryl Fischer Francis Hagen Way, the Metropolitan Area Agency on Aging (MAAA) and Alko Higuchi Hennepin County. Friends of HOME, an organization that solicits Laurie Lafontaine contributions from individuals, businesses, civic groups and Rep. Ann Lenczewskl Phil Kem churches provides support as well. Dr. Chinyere (Ike) Njake Dotty O'Brien Sincerely, Senator Gen Olson Curtis A. Pearson Tom Ticen Benjamin F. Withhart Executive Directors t;.E.0. Ron Bloch Program Administrator PROGRAMS • Supporting Positive Aging - Transportation - Community Senior Centers • Caregiver Support Services - Senior Outreach • Frail Elder Support Services - H.O.M.E. - Senior Outreach A Founding Member of Eldercare Partners OVIR A United Way Agency 2005 URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM REQUEST FOR FUNDING (Use one form per project) A. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. City: Edina 2. Project Name: HOME (Household & Outside Maintenance for Elderly) 3. Contact Person/ Phone No. Ron Bloch/ (952) 541 -1019 B. PROJECT DATA 1. CDBG Funding Requested (needs to be same as council resolution) $ 9,089 2. Is this an existing CDBG - funded project? XYes ❑No 3. Leveraged Funds: (What other public or private funds does project include? If none, indicate w /check here- None: F1 Amount $ See #10 Source: See #10 Amount $ Source: Amount $ Source: 4. Project Location: Address or Citywide X 5. Project Description: (Describe the project in as much detail as possible, including the local need(s) the project will address) See attached Program Summary 6. Consolidated Plan Priorities: Using the Priority Summary, identify what priority(ies) the project will meet. (Note: If a proposed project is a low urban county priority, you must explain why it has a higher priority in your community.) Priority(ies) project will address: Public Service Needs — Senior Services — High Priority 7. Describe anticipated results /accomplishments the project will have. (number of persons/ households to be assisted/served, number of housing units to be rehabilitated/built, etc.) In 2004 the project served 135 Edina residents (116 households). It is anticipated that approximately the same number will be served in 2005. 8. Describe how project will assist the community in achieving your Livable . Communities Act goals (if applicable) 9. Implementation Schedule: (Identify major project tasks to occur during within the first 12 months of the 18 month expenditure period.) Task: On -going delivery of services including Date: CDBG Year 2005 maintenance (minor carpentry, plumbing, concrete work, and electrical repairs and interior /exterior painting), Chore Services (lawn mowing & snow shoveling), and Homemaking (cleaning, vacuuming, dusting, washing clothes, window washing). 10. Budget: (Specify total project budget by major project component —i.e; administration, planning, construction, acquisition, direct grants, public service.) COMPONENT BUDGET /SOURCE OF FUNDS CDBG Other (identify) Public Services/Brooklyn Center $22,000 $157,000 Client Fees Public Services/Eden Prairie $ 6,000 $ 93,294 United Way Public Services/Edina $ 9,089 $ 16,911 Edina/EEHF Public Services/Minnetonka $16,000 $ 64,000 MAAA Public Services/Richfield $20,000 $ 84,592 Hen County $ 10,000 Donations Project Totals $73,089 $425,797 Attachment H.O.M.E. (Household & Outside Maintenance for Elderly) Program Summary SUMMARY PARAGRAPH - The H.O.M.E. Program is a homemaker, maintenance and chore services program designed as a cost - effective alternative to rising costs of long term care for the elderly. It currently operates in the cities of Bloomington, Brooklyn Center, Crystal, Eden Prairie, Edina, Golden Valley, Hopkins, Minnetonka, New Hope, Plymouth, Richfield, Robbinsdale and St. Louis Park. The Program maintains a core staff of trained individuals to assure prompt, quality services and a skills bank component. Clients are asked to pay for services based on ability (sliding fee scale). TARGET POPULATION — Consumers of H.O.M.E. services are residents age 60+ or people with disabilities who live independently and need some affordable in -home services in order to maintain their residence. The Program serves clients who need assistance but are not financially able to afford the full cost of the service as well as frail older adults who require services . designed to meet their needs. SERVICES — The philosophy of the H.O.M.E. Program is to help maintain independence for elders and avoid premature nursing home placement by providing homemaker, maintenance and chore services. Clients are asked to pay based on a sliding -fee scale. Homemaker services include housecleaning, food preparation, grocery shopping, doing laundry and window washing. Assessments are made and services provided according to the specific needs of each client for type of service, time and frequency. Chore/home maintenance services include snow removal, lawn care, installation of security features, carpentry, minor plumbing, interior /exterior painting, weatherization, minor roof repair and other jobs needed to enable elderly residents to remain in their homes, as well as maintaining their homes in an accordance with community standards. STAFF — Home maintenance and homemaker services are provided by workers who are trained in the techniques of working with elders. Skills Bank Workers (independent contractors) are also utilized to provide chore services. Staff reports to a Program Director, who is responsible for their supervision and daily Program operation. Other staff and volunteers provide administrative and clerical support. FACILITY — Services are delivered in the homes of elderly residents. Program offices are located at Creekside Community Center, 9801 Penn Ave. South, Bloomington and 7940 551, Ave. North, New Hope. A satellite office is located at the Minnetonka Senior Center. PLACEMENT PROCEDURE — Clients gain access to the Program either directly by contacting the H.O.M.E. office or by referral from an area agency. FUNDING SOURCES — Revenues are derived from client fees, a service contract with Hennepin County for clients with very low incomes, the Metropolitan Area Agency on Aging MAAA) in support of chore services, cities in which the Program operates, the United Way, and contributions from clients and Friends of HOME, an organization that solicits donations from businesses, churches and community groups. Commun Community Services Emergency Assistance Homeless Family Support Transitional Housing Energy Assistance Reverse Mortgage Counseling Home Buyer Education Homeowner Counseling Home Rehab Counseling Planning & Development for Community Collaboration 33 10th Avenue South Suite 150. Hopkins, MN 55343 Tel 952 - 933 -9639 Fax 952 - 933 -8016 Website www.cashenn.org Investing in People, Building Community EQUAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITY 1� i Y Action t for Suburban Hennepin January 25, 2005 Joyce Repya City Of Edina 4801 W. 50d St. Edina, MN 55424 RE: Community Action for Suburban Hennepin Application for 2005 CDBG Public Service Funding Dear Ms. Repya Community Action for Suburban Hennepin ( "CASH") is pleased,to submit its 2005 CDBG application to The City of Edina. CASH, as the anti- poverty community action agency serving suburban Hennepin County, has provided residents of Edina with full -cycle homeownership services since 1992. These services include foreclosure prevention, rehab advice and assistance, homebuyer education and counseling, and reverse mortgage counseling. We look forward to continuing the partnership between CASH and Edina in providing housing and other services to Edina residents. If you have any questions, or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact myself or Marcy Harris. Thank you in advance for the opportunity to submit this proposal. Sin erely Ophe se andall, Community Developer Our mission: To improve the quality of life in suburban Hennepin County by creating and supporting links between individuals and communities through: service, education, and collaboration. r 2005 URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM REQUEST FOR FUNDING A. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. City: Edina 2. Project Name: Community Action for Suburban Hennepin (CASH) - Full -Cycle Homeownership Contact Person/ Phone Nom: Marcy Hams, Director of Planning & Development 952- 933 -9639, ext. 225 B. PROJECT DATA 1. CDBG Funding Requested (needs to be same as council resolution) $ 5,000 2. Is this an existing CDBG - funded project? ®Yes ONo 3. Leveraged Funds: (What other public or private funds does project include? If none, indicate w/rhPrk here- Nnne' n) 2004 ANTICIPATED REVENUES AMOUNT SOURCE Committed Pending $85,000 NIHFA (incl. direct assistance) ✓ ✓ (partially committed) $42,500 HC (direct assist.) ✓ ✓ (partially committed) $150,000 HUD ✓ $50,000 SLP CDBG (incl. direct assistance ✓ $47,340 CDBG — other cities ✓ ✓ (partially committed) $263,719 CSBG / Community Action grant. ✓ ✓ (partially committed) $41,500 MN Human Services ✓ $680,059 4. - Project Location: The City of Edina and all of suburban Hennepin County. 5. Project Description: Community Action for Suburban Hennepin (CASH) offers full cycle homeownership services to assist low to moderate - income households and underrepresented populations become and remain successful homeowners. CASH'S full cycle homeownership program includes homebuyer education, home maintenance, repair and rehab education, foreclosure prevention and reverse mortgage counseling. CASH is currently enhancing it services to meet the housing needs of the growing immigrant populations. Service enhancement includes language specific counselors and materials in Russian, Spanish and Somali. CASH'S full -cycle homeownership programs will help Edina residents and future residents. maintain and obtain safe, stable housing. We'll work to help residents avoid foreclosure. Continue offering Edina residence and future residents' homebuyer education. In addition, CASH will provide Edina seniors options on improving their standard of living through a reverse mortgage. As issues of affordability rise, homeowners need housing services that contribute to successful homeownership 6. Consolidated Plan Priorities: The project meets the high priority need of "providing increased opportunities for homeownership to households with income below 50 percent of median income," by specifically targeting its programs to service the low- income residents of Hennepin County. Two - thirds of the clients assisted by CASH are at or below 50% of median income. Through all of its homeownership programs, CASH assists residents to obtain and maintain affordable, stable safe housing in the service area communities. Assuring that individuals and families are in affordable and stable housing lessens the need for public assistance in this area (e.g. lessens use of shelters or other housing and social services programs), and assists to produce or maintain healthy, economically stable communities. 7. Describe anticipated results/accomplishments the project will have. (number of persons/ households to be assisted/served, number of housing units to be rehabilitated/built, etc.) During the past year, CASH assisted theffollowing numbers of households in the city of Edina: Foreclosure Prevention: 5 First Time Homebuyers: 11 Rehab & Maintenance: 0 Reverse Mortgage: 12 This year, CASH anticipates being able to provide service to your community by serving the following numbers of households: Foreclosure Prevention: 6 First Time Homebuyers: 11 Rehab & Maintenance: 1 Reverse Mortgage: 14 8. Describe how project will assist the community in achieving your Livable Communities Act goals (if applicable) not applicable 9. Implementation Schedule: All services are currently offered (immediate implementation) 10. Budget: (Specify total project budget by major project component -i.e; administration, planning, construction, acquisition, direct grants, public service.) ALL Sources of EXPENSES PROGRAM I FUNDING Funding S Component CDBG Other Total (Identify) Salmi, $243,513 $ 5,000 $238,513 $243,513 HUD MEOG /CSBG NIHFA (all programs, add. for FP, 15` HB, non - English classes) Henn. City CDBG: Consol. Pool, SLP Private Benefits $61,225 $61,225 $61,225 Professional/Counseling services (incl. consultants, translators, etc) $33,450 $33,450 $33450 Travel $5,773 $5,773 $5,773 Publications, dues, cert. fees, training $10,733 $10,733 $10,733 Donations Printing & Supplies $12,438 $12,438 $12,438 (see revenue breakdown Computer, Equipment & Related $20,184 $20,184 $20,184 below) IN Assistance or ; = $1:00,000 $100,000' $100,000 In =Kind EX 'enses (e' loans)''' Administration (incl. supervision, $156,092 $156,092 $156,092 postage) Indirect (rent, phone, etc.) $36,651 $36,651 $36,651 TOTAL $680,059 $5,000 $675,059 $680,059 HOME y p Office Phone: 612/728 -5770 ® CD Hotline: 6121728 -5767 3455 Bloomington Avenue Fax: 612/728 -5761 Minneapolis, MN 55407 www.homelinemn.org Ms. Joyce Repya Community Development City. of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN. 55424 January 21, 2005 Dear Ms. Repya, This letter is to request funding in the amount of $ 4,000 from the City of Edina's Community Development Block Grant Program. This funding would support HOME Line's Tenant Hotline Services and High School Renter, Education, as well as offering new services through our Immigrant Outreach Project. .In addition to providing residents in Edina our tenant hotline services and high school renter education program, we will now be addressing the needs of new immigrant communities. We are excited about this new program because it allows individuals with language and cultural barriers to access our services and get the information they need to keep. their . homes safe, decent, and affordable., Tam enclosing our CDBG application and a one -page sheet summarizing our hotline's service to Edina residents. HOME Line is building upon our depth of experience in serving Edina. We are creating new solutions to meet current challenges and addressing the needs of low income residents is a priority for HOME Line. We would like the City of Edina to continue as our partner in meeting these needs. Please feel free to call Michael Vraa, our Managing Attorney and Hotline Director at 612 728 -5770 x 113 if you need further information. We look forward to'hearing from you. Sincerely, Beth Kodluboy Executive Director enclosures as noted Summary of HOME Line's Tenant Services Proposal Renters make up nearly 4,924 households in Edina, and many of these families have low incomes. When renters. have problems involving their homes, those who don't know their rights and responsibilities can end up living in housing that is unsafe, lose money that is rightfully theirs, or make decisions that cost them their home. HOME Line provides renters with the tools necessary to keep their homes safe and affordable. HOME Line will provide three distinct, but related, programs as part of this grant: a tenant hotline that provides free legal advice to tenants about landlord /tenant law, a high school educational program, and our new immigrant outreach program that provides services to new immigrants. These services prevent problems ranging from homelessness to illness from unsafe living conditions, and result in reducing the use of the city's emergency resources. While our services are available to all renters free of charge, over 94% of our callers are low or very- low income; almost three quarters (72.5°/x) of these callers are women; 21 % are racial minorities. Our programs are aimed at low income renters, high school students who are about to enter the rental market, and recent immigrants. Tenant Hotline The first of these programs is HOME Line's tenant hotline. The hotline began in 1992 as a service to Suburban Hennepin County residents. Today, we serve the entire state (excluding Minneapolis and St. Paul) and have recently taken our 70,000th call. Three staff attorneys work full time on the hotline along with 40 -60 law student volunteers each year. Edina has accounted for 2,867 calls since 1992. Our tenant services to Edina have helped save tenants at least $30,000. Last year alone we advised 67 callers from Edina. The most common reasons Edina residents call our hotline are; repairs, security deposits, evictions, break lease questions and questions about how proper notice to vacate is given. The need for this service in Edina is apparent — Edina residents already rely on this valuable service. High School Renter Education Nroaram The second program is our high school presentation program. To date, we have spoken to 660 classes (over 17,000 students) throughout the metro area. At Edina Schools this last year, we have spoken to 5 separate classes (117 students). This award winning class (Business Economic Education Foundation) focuses on the things that future renters should know, including how to avoid evictions, how to select roommates, security deposits and understanding leases. Immigrant Outreach Project The third program focuses on immigrant outreach efforts. According to the 2000 census, foreign born people make up at least 2,870 or 6.1 % of the Edina population (a number which will surely continue to grow). Recognizing that many recent immigrants are not sure where to find a variety of useful resources, HOME Line has recently begun working to bridge this gap. A recent example of how this program works illustrates how we will implement it in Edina: The African- Assistance Program is a Brooklyn Park based agency that works on issues affecting recent immigrants from Africa (their criteria for helping someone is that they moved to the U.S. in the last seven years). We recently sent a staff attorney to conduct a three hour training at their office. In attendance were staff from the African- Assistance Program along with volunteers that frequently work in their office. The three hour session is designed to give a broad overview to the key concepts of landlord tenant law in Minnesota. Now, when a client of their program approaches them with a problem concerning their tenancy, they are put in contact with the specific attorney who spoke at their office. If the client needs to fax in documents or needs a translator, the African - Assistance Program tries to provide this help. The goal of this program is to have the social service agency serve as a conduit between the recent immigrant with a tenant problem and our office. By offering free tenant hotline services and free high school renter education programs for high school students, HOME Line has been providing needed services for those most vulnerable. Many recent immigrant groups live and work in Edina and many of them are living in rental housing HOME Line CDBG Application to Edina January 21, 2004 Page 2. with lower incomes and have no knowledge of their rental rights. It is important that we train and work with those social service providers who have contact with these new residents, so they too can use the tenant services to solve their rental problems. Costs of Service Starting the immigration outreach project, we expect the number of people from Edina calling our hotline to increase. Our hotline budget is $ 250,000 and the amount HOME Line is requesting from Edina reflects our work in the city. The service cost is reasonable and appropriate as indicated by the following hourly rates multiplied by the time spent on each project. All three of these programs can be measured in hourly service units of measurement. The hotline callers can be tracked through our database, which records demographic information, the reason for calling, results including evictions prevented and damage deposits received. We also track volunteer hours and clients who need representation in court. The high school renter program will be tracked by the number of presentations, and students served, with evaluations from classroom presentations. The immigrant outreach program will be tracked by documenting the organizations involved, number of workers trained, client calls facilitated, and the evaluations of participating organizations. Costs for all three of these programs can be most easily broken down by hourly rate. This figure is derived by taking the three hotline staff salaries and and benefits, dividing by the hours worked and multiplying this amount by .3 overhead factor in compliance with OMB Circular 122. 2005 Hourly Rate Michael Vraa 38.82 Paul Bimberg 33.25 Brenda Kiepert- Holthaus 34.16 Staff Average 35.41 For hotline callers, the average call, documenting time and follow up calls takes 30 minutes. 2005 100 calls at 30 minutes= 50 hours x 35.41 = $1,770.50 For high school presentations the average is three hours for preparation, drive time and presentation. 2005 5 high school classes x 3 hours =15 hours x 35.41 = $ 531.15 For our immigrant outreach program, the costs will be reflected by direct hours spent contacting and following through with organizations, planning and developing the training, preparing materials, drive time and ongoing contact with social workers. Time can be specifically itemized by these activities and documented on time sheets. 2005 50 hours x 35.14 = $ 1,757.50 2005 Hotline calls /eviction prevention 1,757.50 High school renter education 531.15 Immigrant outreach program 1.757.50 Total Costs 4,059.15 HOME Line Renters' "Hotline" Edina Information on calls during the period 1/1/92 through 12/31/2004 Over the past thirteen years a total of 1,224 Edina renters have contacted HOME Line. This represents service to approximately 3,060 residents when all family members have been counted. The vast majority (over 87 %) of Edina callers to HOME Line are "low" or "very-low" income. These income categories are those used by the U.S. Department of H.U.D.: Very Low: incomes below 50% of the metro median Low: incomes between 50% and 80% of the metro median Moderate: incomes above 80% of the metro median. Renter's Education HOME Line's High School Renter's Program provides advice on tenant rights and responsibilities. This free presentation covers most things that first time renters are likely to encounter, including roommate problems, evictions, security deposits and repair problems. In. the last thirteen years, HOME Line has been to Edina High School three times, speaking to 57 students. We have also been to Southview Middle School for two classes, speaking to 60 students. HOME Line has also sent speakers to many property manager's meetings, continuing legal education seminars and trainings for various shelters /resource centers. Number of Calls Per Year Callers' Incomes 1992-2004 Low Q.y4 33% Very Low 54% Q; Moderate . 13% HOME Line, has helped Edina residents recover money from their landlords. Tenants have received $ 13,711 back from improperly withheld security deposits and $17,019 in rent abatements (refunds for. substandard conditions). The Hotline receives approximately 8,000 calls per year. Careful records are taken for each call, including the reason the tenant called. These are the top ten topics in Edina over the last thirteen years (followed by the number of calls): 1. Repairs 223 2. Security Deposits 146 3. Evictions 132 4. Break Lease 120 5. Notice to Vacate 119 6. Lease Questions 70 7. Privacy/Intrusion 47 8. Rent Increase 46 9. Fees 39 10. Neighbor Problems 29 127 129 80 101 M 98 96 93 105 74. 77 76 . 87 100 63 so 0 92 93 94 95 96 .97 96 99 00 01 02 03 04 Callers' Incomes 1992-2004 Low Q.y4 33% Very Low 54% Q; Moderate . 13% HOME Line, has helped Edina residents recover money from their landlords. Tenants have received $ 13,711 back from improperly withheld security deposits and $17,019 in rent abatements (refunds for. substandard conditions). The Hotline receives approximately 8,000 calls per year. Careful records are taken for each call, including the reason the tenant called. These are the top ten topics in Edina over the last thirteen years (followed by the number of calls): 1. Repairs 223 2. Security Deposits 146 3. Evictions 132 4. Break Lease 120 5. Notice to Vacate 119 6. Lease Questions 70 7. Privacy/Intrusion 47 8. Rent Increase 46 9. Fees 39 10. Neighbor Problems 29 RESOLUTION NO. 2005-12 RESOLUTION APPROVING PROPOSED USE OF 2005 SUBURBAN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM FUNDS AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY AND ANY THIRD PARTY AGREEMENTS City of Edina WHEREAS, the City of Edina, through execution of a Joint Cooperation Agreement with Hennepin County, is cooperating in the Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina has developed a proposal for the use of 2005 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant funds made available to it; and WHEREAS, the City held a public hearing on February 15, 2005, to obtain the views of citizens on housing and community development needs and priorities and the City's proposed use of $172,355 from the 2005 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant. BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Edina approves the following projects for funding from the 2005 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program and authorizes submittal of the proposed budget to Hennepin County. Activi Budget Rehabilitation of Private Property $66,502 Scattered Site Affordable Housing $80,000 Greater Minneapolis Daycare Association $ 8,191 Senior Community Services (HOME) $ 9,280 Community Action for Suburban Hennepin (CASH) $ 4,191 HOME Line $ 4,191 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor and the City Manager to execute the Subrecipient Agreement and any required Third Party Agreement on behalf of the City to implement the 2005Community Development Block Grant Program. Attest ADOPTED: the 15th day of February 2005. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of February 15, 2005, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this day of .2005. City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 f i w gZNA. �1 O e E REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item: III. B. ;From: Craig Larsen Consent ❑ City Planner Information Only ❑ Date: February 15, 2005 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Action: ❑ Motion Final Development Plan ® Resolution Frauenshuh Companies , ❑ Ordinance 7700 France Ave. So. ❑ Discussion Recommendation: The Planning Commission recommends Final Development Plan approval, subject to: 1. Grant of easement for turn lane from France Avenue to Minnesota Drive. 2. Watershed District permits a Information /Background: See attached Planning Commission minutes, staff report and plans. LOCATION MAP Case Number: P -05 -1 Location: 7700 France Avenue South Request: Construct New Freestanding Building w9A,j Y we O MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA PLANNING COMMISISON WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 26, 2005: 7:00 PM EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 4801 WEST 50TH STREET DRAFT MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair, David Byron, Michael Fischer, John Lonsbury, Helen McClelland, Geof Workinger and Michael Schroeder MEMBERS ABSENT: David Runyan and Stephen Brown STAFF PRESENT: Craig Larsen and Jackie Hoogenakker I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: The minutes of the December 1, 2004, meeting were filed with corrections. II. NEW BUSINESS: P -05 -1 Frauenshuh Companies 7700 France Avenue Final Development Plan Mr. Larsen informed the board the proponent is requesting Final Development Plan approval to construct a freestanding building in the southeasterly portion of the site. Mr. Larsen explained the subject property was originally developed as headquarters for National Car Rental. In 2000 the building was sold to the current owner, and is presently a multi- tenant office building. The request proposes a new, freestanding 7,000 square foot building near the intersection of Minnesota Drive and France Avenue. The new building would occupy an area now used for surface parking. The plans also suggest a second building pad in the northeasterly portion of the site. This pad is not part of the current proposal, and would be subject to review a some future date. Mr. Larsen pointed out the City did grant a parking variance in connection with the original development of this site. The Proof of Parking agreement associated with that variance was released in 1983. The property is now subject to normal zoning requirements of the POD -2 District. Mr. Larsen told the Commission in 1994 Minnesota Drive, which borders the south side of the site, was built as a joint venture with the City of Bloomington. Bloomington handled the construction, and Edina shared in the cost. Mr. Larsen noted a review of records indicates that no easement was provided for the "free right" turn lane at the northwest corner of Minnesota and France. The owners have agreed to now dedicate the necessary right of way. This dedication will require that the new building be moved to the north to meet setback requirements. Mr. Larsen said the proposed plans comply with all Zoning Ordinance standards except for the building setback. Staff recommends moving the new building north to meet the required setbacks. Moving the proposed building north will result in.the loss of a few parking spaces, but will not affect total parking or the adequacy of convenient parking for the new building. Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends approval of the proposed Final Development Plan subject to: 1. Dedication of Right of Way for existing turn lane. 2.- Watershed District permits. 3. Adjustment of building pad to comply with setback requirements from new right of way. Mr. John Donnelly and Mr. Eric Reiners were present representing Frauenshuh Companies. Mr. Donnelly addressed the Commission and told them as indicated in the revised plan before them the building pad of the new building has been moved to comply with setback requirements from the new right of way. Mr. Donnelly introduced Mr. Eric Reiners to the Commission. Mr. Reiners told the Commission at present an engineer is working on an exact description for the adjusted right of way line, adding it is hoped that is completed by the time this goes before City Council. Continuing, Mr. Reiners told the Commission exterior building materials for the new building have been slightly modified with the entrance to the building remaining on the north end. Mr. Reiners noted the roof top equipment would now be placed on grade screened by an enclosure that meets code requirements. 2 Chair Byron questioned if in the future the owner(s) decide to subdivide the lot creating separate parcels would the new lot/building have the ability to "stand- alone" as it relates to code. Mr. Larsen responded if subdivided the "new lot" would have to meet all requirements. He added the size of this site would in all probability make that possible. Commissioner Fischer questioned where trash would be stored and where deliveries would occur. Mr. Reiners explained the proposed use of the new building is not a "cash institution" with walk up brokerage. Any deliveries would be minimal. Continuing, Mr. Reiners said the trash area is located adjacent to the loading dock with all maintenance for this building tied to the entire site. Commissioner Lonsbury observed signage doesn't seem to be addressed and asked if signage has been considered for the new building. Mr. Reiners responded signage is being considered to the best of his knowledge there will be no signage along France Avenue. Signage is proposed over the north door and the southwest side of the building. Commissioner Lonsbury asked if it is important that the indicated corporate logo is incorporated into the buildings signage. Mr. Reiners responded he believes the logo would be an important element, adding at this time a signage package has not been finalized. Mr. Larsen told the Commission signage is not part of this process; however, a sign permit(s) is required to ensure compliance with the City's sign ordinance. Commissioner McClelland moved to recommend Final Development Plan approval subject to; dedication of right of way for the turn lane, Watershed District permits, adjustment of building pad to comply with setback requirements, noting signage will be addressed at a later date. Commissioner Losnbury seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Chair Byron suggested to the proponents that all "loose ends" be resolved by the time this is heard by the City Council. 3 y o e �� REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 26, 2005 7:00 PM, EDINA COUNCIL CHAMBERS 4801 WEST 50TH STREET Case Number: P -05 -1 Location: 7700 France Avenue South Property Owner: Frauenshuh Companies 7101 West 78th Street Bloomington, MN Applicant: John Donnelly Frauenshuh Companies Zoning: POD -2, Planned Office District Request: Final Development Plan approval to construct a freestanding building in the southeasterly portion of the site. Background: The subject property was originally developed as headquarters for National Car Rental. In 2000 the building was sold to the current owner, and is presently a multi- tenant office building. The request proposes a new, freestanding 7,000 square foot building near the intersection of Minnesota Drive and France Avenue. The new building would occupy an area now used for surface parking. The plans also suggest a second building pad in the northeasterly portion of the site. This pad is not part of the current proposal,'and would be subject to review a some future date. The City did grant a parking variance in connection with the original development of this site. The Proof of Parking agreement associated with that variance was released in 1983. The property is now subject to normal zoning requirements of the POD -2 District. In 1994 Minnesota Drive, which borders the south side of the site, was built as a joint venture with the City of Bloomington. Bloomington handled_ the construction, and Edina shared in the cost. A review of records indicates that no easement was provided for the "free right" turn lane at the northwest corner of Minnesota and France. The owners have agreed to now dedicate the necessary right of way. This dedication will require that the new building be moved to the north to meet setback requirements. Zoning Compliance: The proposed plans comply with all Zoning Ordinance standards except for the building set back cited above. A site this size could have up to 372,000 square feet of floor area. Total square footage after adding the new building will be 269,800 square feet. The plan provides over 100 spaces more than required for and office development of this size. The proposed building materials and landscaping comply with ordinance requirements. Moving the new building north will result in the loss of a few spaces, but will not affect total parking or the adequacy of convenient parking for the new building. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the proposed Final Development Plan. Recommended conditions are: 1. Dedication of Right of Way for existing turn lane. 2. Watershed District permits. 3. Adjustment of building pad to comply with setback requirements from new right of way. 1 , GENERAL NOTES H, WS75CAPE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS ON PROPERTY MTH THE 6B8iAL CONTRACTOR MID BY CALLING 60P Ht STATE ONE CALL PRIOR TO STAKINS PLANT LOCATIONS. 2. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SMALL COIRY PM THE LATEST EDITION OF THE M6L" STANDARD POR N.R<R3tY STOCK. AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF MAME RYlBL 5. CONTRACTOR 5 RESPONSIBLE FOR ON-60M MAINTENANCE OF ALL M31LY INSTALLED MATERIALS LIMM TIME OF OPI ER ACCEPTANCE ANY ACTS OP VANDALISM OR DAMAGE MACH MAY OCCUR PRIOR TO OPaHR ACCI7fANCE SHALL BE THE RMPORNSIL TY OF THE CONTRACTOR 4. NO FLAW MATERIAL SUESTIMIONS MLL BE ACCT PSTIM APPROVAL BY THE AFLMiFLT 5, PROVIDE PARK 6RADE TREE 6. FIARRANYf FOR LANDSCAPE MATERIALS SHALL EBBW ON THE DATE OF AC417T Y.E BY THE ARCHITECT. 1. CONTRACTOR SMALL 6UARAMEE MEN PLANT MATERIAL THROUSH ONE CALENDAR YEAR FROM THE DATE OF OMHt ACC47TAWZ MTH ALL FIOPLK.@EOS TO BE PROVIDED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE CYOM S. A LAIDSCAPNG INSPECTION FEE SMALL BE PAID TO TIE NTY AT 7HE TIME A Mum OR OT/ER PERMIT S ISSUED FOR INORK TO BE DOME ON THE SAME PROPERTY AS THE LAND3CAPN5 MORAL, AND AS A COHDRION TO THE W ANCE OF THE PERMT. 9. ROCK KLGH SPEC. RNEt FLOCK' . 10 LAMP IRRI6ATION SYSTEM TO BE NSTALLED N ALL AREAS PITH SOD I� LLaMILy Symbol Code Henn 9TAKN6 719 tl OPTIONAL PARKING SUMMARY Cammarlts 19114• REfO16 E FOR AN"' TREES N A RUB MSRION C43 Plcesa Purger Gleuca EMTIN7 OFFICE AREA 767.176 V. b• POLY 40 MIL MA' AIDE STRAP KK S' ROCK MINI SO' - 40' TYP. DO16LE STRAND OVBt I.ANDY.APE EMTM PARING SPACE& VIW SPACES M 6D,. MM a DO* FABRG PER PR Code Name SPACM 7 0D N00 OFFICE AN" ion 6F. TR (RAPPING ® REMOVE 916AP FROM IRER Ir9 I Thja occldernalls Tectny Globe' PRA P FIRST Jd TOTAL CFRCE AFEA 26SAM SF. KLLN MIL T DEEP SOLL Mx 1 Myetrangea Arborescers 'Awbelle' I Arrnbelle M9c1rarlgee 1 SCARIFY SIDES II BALK DWa71D TOTAL PAR IM2 FEamam, LTSO SPACES VICINITY NAP OP ROOI64lL Ea LNI • CO. 5PAC INS Common Name N6 RAIR 50LL 6, COIYACTED 5oLL ,r--,f TOTAL PAWING PROVIDED, 16471 SPACES OA SUBSRADE SALCEI STAKE AT AN ANGLE ' PriBARE AFG MN. 4' BAB 2 PLANTING DETAILS Q wDN Ae Seeeherun- AI s o. 76TH ST W. < I 1 I � 1 I NO SCALE S7 W.D.- SITE 1 1 � 77TH ST. W. 1 1 � 1 1 rA 1 1 1 1 1 � 1 ®I ' eiiliiiuiiiliiiiniiiuiiiiiiiniiniuuluullululuilliliiiiiiiiuiiilinil� ►�I IIITTTTIhhpFthbl j _ ';� '" � ; a MEM 1 0 1 1 � 1 1 � 1 Clllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll�lllllllllllllllllllllllllllll1 1 RTDO 1 1 / 1 1 1 _ �. is 1 77TH STREET WEST % .� AEA L@077!IMMITOPpAY --- - - - - -o - - -� KEY PLAN GENERAL NOTES H, WS75CAPE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS ON PROPERTY MTH THE 6B8iAL CONTRACTOR MID BY CALLING 60P Ht STATE ONE CALL PRIOR TO STAKINS PLANT LOCATIONS. 2. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SMALL COIRY PM THE LATEST EDITION OF THE M6L" STANDARD POR N.R<R3tY STOCK. AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF MAME RYlBL 5. CONTRACTOR 5 RESPONSIBLE FOR ON-60M MAINTENANCE OF ALL M31LY INSTALLED MATERIALS LIMM TIME OF OPI ER ACCEPTANCE ANY ACTS OP VANDALISM OR DAMAGE MACH MAY OCCUR PRIOR TO OPaHR ACCI7fANCE SHALL BE THE RMPORNSIL TY OF THE CONTRACTOR 4. NO FLAW MATERIAL SUESTIMIONS MLL BE ACCT PSTIM APPROVAL BY THE AFLMiFLT 5, PROVIDE PARK 6RADE TREE 6. FIARRANYf FOR LANDSCAPE MATERIALS SHALL EBBW ON THE DATE OF AC417T Y.E BY THE ARCHITECT. 1. CONTRACTOR SMALL 6UARAMEE MEN PLANT MATERIAL THROUSH ONE CALENDAR YEAR FROM THE DATE OF OMHt ACC47TAWZ MTH ALL FIOPLK.@EOS TO BE PROVIDED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE CYOM S. A LAIDSCAPNG INSPECTION FEE SMALL BE PAID TO TIE NTY AT 7HE TIME A Mum OR OT/ER PERMIT S ISSUED FOR INORK TO BE DOME ON THE SAME PROPERTY AS THE LAND3CAPN5 MORAL, AND AS A COHDRION TO THE W ANCE OF THE PERMT. 9. ROCK KLGH SPEC. RNEt FLOCK' . 10 LAMP IRRI6ATION SYSTEM TO BE NSTALLED N ALL AREAS PITH SOD Plant Table I� LLaMILy Symbol Code Henn 9TAKN6 719 tl OPTIONAL Common Name Cammarlts 19114• REfO16 E FOR AN"' TREES N A RUB MSRION C43 Plcesa Purger Gleuca THROUGHOUT THE 6MARANTEE PERIOD. b• POLY 40 MIL MA' AIDE STRAP KK S' ROCK MINI SO' - 40' TYP. DO16LE STRAND OVBt I.ANDY.APE ONE FLAG 13413 M 6D,. MM a DO* FABRG PER PR Code Name SPACM 7 0D CexmnMS I Plentwg Sim TR (RAPPING ® REMOVE 916AP FROM IRER Ir9 I Thja occldernalls Tectny Globe' PRA P FIRST Jd OF BALL HIM. KLLN MIL T DEEP SOLL Mx 1 Myetrangea Arborescers 'Awbelle' I Arrnbelle M9c1rarlgee 1 SCARIFY SIDES II BALK DWa71D } eiNlle GTM0S9 QuaMIty ROiOIBaLI OP ROOI64lL Ea LNI • CO. 5PAC INS Common Name N6 RAIR 50LL 6, COIYACTED 5oLL ,r--,f Y x 1' x 24' HOOD 0 OA SUBSRADE SALCEI STAKE AT AN ANGLE ' PriBARE AFG MN. 4' BAB 2 PLANTING DETAILS Q wDN Ae Seeeherun- AI 4- BAS Plant Table Conifer Ever Teen LLaMILy Symbol Code Henn Belexlne Name Common Name Cammarlts Plarn Blie I C43 Plcesa Purger Gleuca Colorado Blue 6' -1• 1 Jwpcaus acOpul— rkdora' Medora RocAy MOUxaln ,A:,Ipe 13413 %Tubs a!ftIty Synbol Code Name SClenlInc Name Common Name CexmnMS I Plentwg Sim 23 ® Tc. I Thja occldernalls Tectny Globe' Techy Globe Arb --tae 24' l 1 Myetrangea Arborescers 'Awbelle' I Arrnbelle M9c1rarlgee 1 124' Deciduous Tree QuaMIty Symbol Code Name sCleMlfle Name Common Name Comments I PIeMNtg size 13 0 OA Frax1r9e Pe Utvanlea Creem AM 4' BAB 6 Q SM Ae Seeeherun- Sugar Maple 4- BAS i i I i I i - - ------ -- ------ "! I EMT P'TLON5I6N I F� 4 ® V PPP. li 094 I AYJRED EASEMENT LINE --------------------------=------------ - - - - -- - --------------- SETBACK LINE 77TH STREET WEST AKAL IIQ09=nLPUSZ®'drWAY 105 IN North 3 LANDSCAPE PLAN AI 1'.40' I CI WELMAN SPERIDES A R C H I T E C T S L L C 7700 PRANG AVIL. S. sum !7! SDau 6®'OURSMA Elsa! PR1D@03 0732) D66.v68t FAX V= 9% 960 © 101�TmrAa1M9® ­m1 OWNED: FRAUENSHUH COMPANIES 7101 WEST 78TH STREET, SURE 100 BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 554M TELEPHONE: 9524"90 FAX: 952 3481 PR=cT :: ppppc�.��.�����77.r}}..�� 11T1Ym Lhffi \iJ 7700 FRANCE AVE. ED1N,0 MN I�6.,ey .•Tory w.t wl. vlw .v'arloRm rep.rt my peN y e. or maer mp U6 at .u—hil laaemea Ni.. .t may w. I.n .f wa m.4e of Rmve.1.. Name: DaLm Ra. No.: - DATE: L9SUED POR: 12-n-04 Q CITY SUBMITTAL 0 0 0 PRO2ECr NO. O4-OW DRAWN LEE CRECCZEDD E.R DATE I -75-05 SH M NAME: LANDSCAPE PLAN Sin= NO: Al O O O � mm� N N dZm m2N o�Z C.B. ftj STREET EASMENT PER DOC. NO. 1321642 RIM = 829.11 �t INV.=824.3 t tt) R/W ) 77TH STREET WEST PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION REMOVAL PLAN 40' 0 40' 80' CONSTRUCTION LIMITS PROTECT SANITARY MANHOLE (TYP.) i SAWCUT EXISTING PAVEMENT T PROTECT EXISTING CATCH BASIN SALVAGE SIGN S T CONSTRUCTION LIMITS w Q T W U Z LEGEND • Property Monument Concrete Concrete Curb Underground Telephone L2 Gas K x K Fence Sanitary Sewer Storm Sewer — — — —mow— Underground Electric ® Electric Box Electric Manhole Hydrant 0 Gate Valve ® Catchbasin ® Catchbasin ® Air Conditioning Unit 16 Deciduous Tree (Diameter in Inches) Coniferous Tree (Diameter in Inches) Deciduous Bush Light Pole 9 Concrete Table ® Sanitary Manhole 0 Storm Manhole —906— — Existing Contour WELMAN SPERIDES A R C H I T E C T S L L C 7700 PRANCE AVH., S. SUrM 373 EDWA. DRNNIiSOTA 63423 mom (931) 996.9661 PAIC 0-2) 996.966) © �n vmJUxo+n® -m OWNER: F FRAUENSHUH f COMPANIES 7101 WEST 79TH STREET, SUITE 100 BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 33179 TELEPHONE 952. 829-3480 FAX: 9524829-3481 PROJECT: �+p}���) �n1/'iQl(l�ri�:.l�wl�l �1T.T. 11\YES1MEN1S 7100 FRANCE AVE EDINA. MN I hertbl nrtilT Wet W. plm, apeNleelba a rt . •u prtpued b7 me m wader m7 direct rupenlebo ead Wt 1 em . dulp 1Jnesd Architect order We lea. N the Stele W Yimeole. Nsme: Dale: Reg. No.: DATE: ISSUED FOR: 12 -22 -04 Q CITY SUBMITTAL 0 0 0 PROJECT NO. 04 -050 DRAWN LEE CHECKED E.R. DATE 1 -25 -05 SHEET NAME: REMOVAL PLAN SHEET NO: C -1 CONSTRUCTION NOTES: GENERAL NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE SECURITY AT ALL TIMES. 2. ALL SIDEWALKS 4' THICK CONCRETE UTILITY NOTES: 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING GOPHER STATE ONE CALL (800 -252 -1165) PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. 2. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING AND DEACTIVATING THE POWER LINES THAT RUN TO THE LIGHT POLES. THESE WILL NOT SHOW UP ON A GOPHER ONE CALL SITE VISIT AS THEY ARE NOT PUBLIC UTILITIES. CURB AND GUTTER 1. THE PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE 0612 WITH THE GUTTER TIPPED AWAY FROM THE FACE OF THE CURB 2. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE FACE OF THE CURB AND GUTTER 3. ALL ELEVATIONS LOCATED ON CURB AND GUTTER ARE LOCATED ON THE TOP OF THE CURB. 4. CURB AND GUTTER TO BE MWDOT TYPE 3A32 FOR MANUAL PLACEMENT, TYPE 3A22 FOR SLIP FORM PLACEMENT AND SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF MNIDOR SECTION 2301, CONCRETE CURBING. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT: 1. ALL BITUMINOUS AND AGGREGATE BASE WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE MNIDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND USE THE ORDINARY COMPACTION METHOD. 2. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT TO USE A MINIMUM OF 3' BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE (MWOOT SPEC. 2340) WITH MINIMUM OF S' OF CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE (MWDOT SPEC 2211) PARKING LANES: 1. ALL STRIPING SHALL BE S' WHITE PAINT REMOVAL NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR IS TO FULL DEPTH SAWCUT THE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT PRIOR TO REMOVAL OF EXISTING PAVEMENT EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL: 1. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SILT FENCE AROUND CONSTRUCTION PERIMETER. SILT FENCE TO BE WOVEN POLYPROPYLENE FABRIC, MIRAFI 100X OR APPROVED EQUAL. PROVIDE 2'%2'X4' WOOD STAKES AT 4' O.C. 2'8' OF FABRIC TO REMAIN ABOVE GRADE WITH REMAINDER ANCHORED UNDER W OF BACKFILL. 2. FURNISH STRAWBALE CHECKS FREE OF WEEDS AND SEED, ANCHORED WITH TWO STAKES PER BAL AROUND CATCH BASIN INLETS TO BE PROTECTED. 3. PROVIDE PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AT EARLIEST PRACTICAL TIME TO MINIMIZE REQUIREMENT FOR TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROS, CONTRACTOR TO MAIN EROSION CONTROL AS NEEDED. 0 R/W e� — m � a Z m mmm «� O M aW n�a �I 0 PROPOSED DRAINAGE STRUCTURE SCHEDULE EXISTING SANITARY LINE (TYP.) EXISTING SIDEWALK MATCH BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT ---� TO EXISTING CURB NEXT (TYP.) EXISTING CONTOURS (TYP.) R/W 77TH STREET WEST MATCH LINE SHEET C -3 X BEGIN PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER i ROPOSED 8612 CURB AND GUTTER (TYP.) 2T -8" 1 2" P� t - PROPOSED \\ CONTOURS d0 I (n Q 55' -8' - In Q ess5o Moo C81 RIM-834 .1 I INV. =630.0 - 25' -4' .21 GRADE TO J DRAIN n74ss x6„ - I I 83' -61' 8.14 R/W F SAWCUT EXISTING PAVEMENT �(n -1 N 20' 0 20' 40' PROPOSED 8612 CURB AND GUTTER (TYP.) 834 Ilk 8.33 PROPOSED SIDEWALK (TYP.) TC STRUCTURE TYPE CASTING FRAME GRATE CURB 1101 TYPE MN /DOT STD PLATE N0. NO. MN /DOT ST PLATE N0. NO. MN/DOT S7 PLATE NO. NO. MN/DOT ST PLATE NO. CBI N 4006 700 -7 4101 701 4140 N/A N/A CB2 F 4005 802A 4129 816 4154 823 4160 CBS H 4006 802A 4129 816 4154 823 4160 CB4 F I 4005 802A 4129 816 4154 823 416D R/W 77TH STREET WEST MATCH LINE SHEET C -3 X BEGIN PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER i ROPOSED 8612 CURB AND GUTTER (TYP.) 2T -8" 1 2" P� t - PROPOSED \\ CONTOURS d0 I (n Q 55' -8' - In Q ess5o Moo C81 RIM-834 .1 I INV. =630.0 - 25' -4' .21 GRADE TO J DRAIN n74ss x6„ - I I 83' -61' 8.14 R/W F SAWCUT EXISTING PAVEMENT �(n -1 N 20' 0 20' 40' PROPOSED 8612 CURB AND GUTTER (TYP.) 834 Ilk 8.33 PROPOSED SIDEWALK (TYP.) TC EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY (TYP.) PROTECT EXISTING CATCH BASIN EXISTING 30' ZONING SETBACK --A (n r � GRADING AND SITE PLAN ll�J SHEET 1 OF 2 hE WELMAN SPERIDES A R C H IT E C T S L L C 7KID FRAHM AVE, B. s>um 3" 13D NA. MDTUBSOTA sum PHOM (9523 996.9662 PAX (952) 996-667 OWNER: FRAUENSHUH COMPANIES 7101 WEST 7M STREET, SUITE 100 BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55139 TELEPHONE 952 - 6294460 FAX: 9524294461 P9DJeR:�7'��� �) � �1T'M77�eG6+L1�1 *17e9. yJ V V r_� MEN 1 S 7700 FRANCE AVE. EDINA. MN 1 N.eeE7 ..if, W.1 W4 P!: ryMfintiee .r 1•P•n m P.•P...4 97 m .e ..4ee o,7 di.M evP.l.ld.. -a W.1 I e n . 4.17 YamN -W— under W. U.. of We ...o ue Ymveml.. N.me: Dale: ReE. No.: - DATE: ISSUED FOR: 1242 -04 Q CITY SUBMITTAL -A - -Z\- 0 PROJECT NO. M -050 DRAWN LEE CRECKED E.R. DAM 1.25 -05 SHEET NAPE: GRADING PLAN 1 OF 2 SHEET NO: C_2 �C C 1J S PROTECT SANITARY T MANHOLE (TYP.) ADJUST CASTING TO MATCH GRADE w EXISTING 30' ZONING SETBACK I EXISTING STORM I, SEWER II W W U 94' -12' RCP ® 1.00% I 9 LL W I CONNECT TO EXIST SEWER iSTORM 0 EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY (TYP.) PROTECT EXISTING CATCH BASIN EXISTING 30' ZONING SETBACK --A (n r � GRADING AND SITE PLAN ll�J SHEET 1 OF 2 hE WELMAN SPERIDES A R C H IT E C T S L L C 7KID FRAHM AVE, B. s>um 3" 13D NA. MDTUBSOTA sum PHOM (9523 996.9662 PAX (952) 996-667 OWNER: FRAUENSHUH COMPANIES 7101 WEST 7M STREET, SUITE 100 BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55139 TELEPHONE 952 - 6294460 FAX: 9524294461 P9DJeR:�7'��� �) � �1T'M77�eG6+L1�1 *17e9. yJ V V r_� MEN 1 S 7700 FRANCE AVE. EDINA. MN 1 N.eeE7 ..if, W.1 W4 P!: ryMfintiee .r 1•P•n m P.•P...4 97 m .e ..4ee o,7 di.M evP.l.ld.. -a W.1 I e n . 4.17 YamN -W— under W. U.. of We ...o ue Ymveml.. N.me: Dale: ReE. No.: - DATE: ISSUED FOR: 1242 -04 Q CITY SUBMITTAL -A - -Z\- 0 PROJECT NO. M -050 DRAWN LEE CRECKED E.R. DAM 1.25 -05 SHEET NAPE: GRADING PLAN 1 OF 2 SHEET NO: C_2 I O 0 e �N O Z m b p � aw �mz °o c 0 vi=EL �I MATCH LINE SHEET C -2 SEE SHEET C -2 FOR DRAINAGE STRUCTURE GRADING AND SITE PLAN TABULATION 20' 0 20' 40' SHEET 2 OF 2 WELMAN SPERIDES A R C H I T E C T S L L C 77001PMNC8 AVJ3. S. 6(ms ns EDINA. MXNDU 0FA 5405 PFIOPIH (952) 996.9ma PAR (952) 996.9665 © �1558tR�JUxYY® Aar. -4a YC -'!m OWNER: FFRAUENSHUH COMPANIES 7101 WEST 16TH STREET. SUITE 100 BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 54439 TELEPHONE: 957 429-3480 FAX: 8574829,3481 PROJECT: �� �{/ ��{�+(�L�:1�-41�1 �17�� R VM1JV11'N1J n . EDMA.MN I Aere57 .." Du W. p1.e, epmilii.Um m report — mpv d 297 oK m mace au dheel mpe Am ma W.4 1 am . Au1J uRmee A4cMleel man m. I... or W< Stele ar Ylmeao4 Nem Dale: Reg. No.: - DATE: ISSUED FOR: 17.77.04 Q CITT &1BHrtTAL 0 PROJECT NO. 04-OW DRAWN LEE CYECYED E.R. DATE 1.74 -05 SHEET NAME: GRADING PLAN 2OF2 SNEST NO: C -3 r' 1'% 0 e m rn C 17 Q fn N dzm m 2 N nom m aW o� i �I R/W I PROVIDE CONCRETE CAR STOPS FOR INTERIOR SIDED PARKING REPLACEMENT HANDICAPPED PARKING 8 STALL REQUIRED 77TH STREET WEST � PARKING PLAN 40' 0 40' 80' 8.5'.16.5' PERIMETER PARKING STALLS WITH 1.5' ALLOWABLE CURB OVERHANG 8.5'x16' INTERIOR PARKING STALLS (TYP.) 8.5'.16.5' PERIMETER PARKING STALLS WITH 1.5' ALLOWABLE CURB OVERHANG W Q LLI U �Qz 9 U- LHANDICAPPED PARKING G AND CURB RAMP C4 u VWELMAN SPERIDES ' 5 A R C H I T E C T S �8- 68 -6•� L L C 7700 PHAPIM AVE- B. Sr1T'm 373 ®HNA, WWCNES0TA 53435 PAINTED HANDICAPPED PfiO>VH P31)Z SYMBOL. WHITE (TYP.) P" a152) 9 %9667 //A © �sas'Trmyweru® OWNER: D FRAUENSHUH ff COMPANIES 7101 WEST 79TH STREET, SUITE 100 BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55439 TELEPHONE: 952.8 80 FAR: 9524129-3491 5' S PROJECT: p�� �7��+(FL1�3 �17r��i Rl\ W ES 11�'1P J\ 3 J FACE OF,.CURB 7700 FRAN(M AVE. EDGE OF SIDEWALK EDINA.MN Q SIDE RAMP SLOPE PROPOSED HANDICAPPED 1:10 MAX (TYP.) PARKING SIGN (TYP OF 2) 5. I eerte7 «rHfy te.t Isle Dl.e, .v-d .Ueo or report xu prep.rtd by me er under ou m m Q direst eeper i. te.t 1 .m . aW7 a m I- uee..e A¢Mteet _der me L.. .r tee FRONT RAMP SLOPE stale or Wivnewl4. n 1:12 MAX z Name: Date: Reg. No.: - 0 PROPOSED DATE: ISSUED FOR: SIDEWALK li -Ji -04 p CITY SIJBMITTAL PROPOSED p HANDICAPPED PARKING AND ENTRANCE p ` CURB RAMP p A A 4' 0 4' 8' p PROJECT N0. 04.050 DRAWN LEE CHECKED E.R. DATE I.25 -05 SHEET NAME: PARKING PLAN TOTAL NUMBER OF STALLS = 135 SHERr NO: C -4 WELMAN SPERIDES A 8 C H I T B C T S L L C TTODPRAMCB wve.• s sum !" )CIA. NQR03BO'1'A 130! PRQM ppq 996. 9dR PA][ OM 9 1 3 4 9 b a § —/ �4''-•6e _ — • P II I I I I I I I I I I I I I J_ _ = IIIIII' L -T L1 I1III= II1 I I I I , I jr J� IIII� � II I Lr I I — =a ' � � � Y� �``I [IIII I I II I I lI pII I / IIILL JI II p IIII4��'II II L II I r � I I ' I 1 I I I � L --Fr L -T Y•C 3C -0• , �— , j I I I I I I I I , la- Ib-T' -• FLOOR PLAN I 1 II I I I I I I I I I I I i i I I I I I I I I I I I I p ' North 96. %O FMFLrrY ©�IaBIR�0l1•t0® OIINRB: FRAUENSHUH COMPANIES nDl WEST 78TH STREET. surtE loo RLOOMWCTON. MINNESOTA 55439 TELEPHONE- 952429.716] FAX' 952429,3481 reonm INVESTMENTS 7700 FRANCB AVE ]EDINA, MN N:•el nd U:•t 1 ® •dab Ik®d 4rLllsl aader 10. 1•n of Oa 54te of YmvmLL N•mc Dalc &[. No. - DATE: ISSUED MR: I:•n.eu � crtr euea'mraL D 0 0 0 PROJECT N0. 04 •6A DROWN LEE CRCC® E.R. DATE I.7i -05 SRR6r NAM: FLOOR PLAN RSBT • N0: .A2.1. 1 3 4 9 b a § —/ �4''-•6e _ — • P II I I I I I I I I I I I I I J_ _ = IIIIII' L -T L1 I1III= II1 I I I I , I jr J� IIII� � II I Lr I I — =a ' � � � Y� �``I [IIII I I II I I lI pII I / IIILL JI II p IIII4��'II II L II I r � I I ' I 1 I I I � L --Fr L -T Y•C 3C -0• , �— , j I I I I I I I I , la- Ib-T' -• FLOOR PLAN I 1 II I I I I I I I I I I I i i I I I I I I I I I I I I p ' North 96. %O FMFLrrY ©�IaBIR�0l1•t0® OIINRB: FRAUENSHUH COMPANIES nDl WEST 78TH STREET. surtE loo RLOOMWCTON. MINNESOTA 55439 TELEPHONE- 952429.716] FAX' 952429,3481 reonm INVESTMENTS 7700 FRANCB AVE ]EDINA, MN N:•el nd U:•t 1 ® •dab Ik®d 4rLllsl aader 10. 1•n of Oa 54te of YmvmLL N•mc Dalc &[. No. - DATE: ISSUED MR: I:•n.eu � crtr euea'mraL D 0 0 0 PROJECT N0. 04 •6A DROWN LEE CRCC® E.R. DATE I.7i -05 SRR6r NAM: FLOOR PLAN RSBT • N0: .A2.1. . TD. fWXW EDGE EL, Ill' -b• A r,Rnoe ELF VARIES NORTH ELEVATION WELMAN SPERIDES A A C H I T H C T S L L C 77aDPYAPI®AVE-3. RUMS n! ®IIiA I11701113507 W.1• -0• TD. ROW DGE EL. ITI' -b• TD. PRECAST EL, 116'_6• — —M. T V9•.1• -0. A ,» PIIOPO; o� Y% %BZ PAIC Olm PPR.PRO 9---- AA04�.91IC•YI O1fH8IL• FRAUENSHUH COMPANIES TIOI WEST 79M STREET, SURE 100 BLOOMINGTON, N!NNESOTA 55439 TELEPHONE: 957-028.3480 FAX: 9524291I81 PROJBCT: � 7�{� �n�prG�W�1 �1TrR.� L\ . � 11Y1�1\ 1 J iM� AVg 1 eenq oonuT UAL IDb Ploo..P.deo.uoo Eneon .a PnP� y oe. a ooaa 4eT alnn mpa.lelm .AA IAn 1 w . d* uoen..e 4ehilal ooaa m. v.. at IAe Wtl. of Ylvv— N.me: DAIe. ReR• Na.: - DATE: ISSUED POR: 17.77.64 Q CTIT 611t OTTAL 0 0 0 0 PROJRR NO. 04-05 6 DRAWN LEE CRECeRD E.R DATE 1 -75 -tea SRRRf MAID?: ELEVATIONS SKEET NO: All W.1• -0• TD. ROW DGE EL. ITI' -b• TD. PRECAST EL, 116'_6• — —M. T V9•.1• -0. A ,» PIIOPO; o� Y% %BZ PAIC Olm PPR.PRO 9---- AA04�.91IC•YI O1fH8IL• FRAUENSHUH COMPANIES TIOI WEST 79M STREET, SURE 100 BLOOMINGTON, N!NNESOTA 55439 TELEPHONE: 957-028.3480 FAX: 9524291I81 PROJBCT: � 7�{� �n�prG�W�1 �1TrR.� L\ . � 11Y1�1\ 1 J iM� AVg 1 eenq oonuT UAL IDb Ploo..P.deo.uoo Eneon .a PnP� y oe. a ooaa 4eT alnn mpa.lelm .AA IAn 1 w . d* uoen..e 4ehilal ooaa m. v.. at IAe Wtl. of Ylvv— N.me: DAIe. ReR• Na.: - DATE: ISSUED POR: 17.77.64 Q CTIT 611t OTTAL 0 0 0 0 PROJRR NO. 04-05 6 DRAWN LEE CRECeRD E.R DATE 1 -75 -tea SRRRf MAID?: ELEVATIONS SKEET NO: All i AGENDA ITEM: III.C. 0ORSEY DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Gordon Hughes, City Manager FROM: Jerome P. Gilligan DATE: February 10, 2005 RE: Subdivision Moratorium As you are aware the decision of the Hennepin County District Court in Pedersen v. City of Edina has called into question the validity of the City's subdivision moratorium. We believe the Court only intended to invalidate the moratorium as to Mr. Pedersen's subdivision application. We have requested that Judge Schellhas clarify her Order to provide that the City's subdivision moratorium is valid except with respect to Mr. Pedersen's subdivision application. A copy of the letter to Judge Schellhas seeking this clarification is attached. I have been advised by Mr. Larsen that since the Court's decision he has received several inquiries concerning potential subdivision requests. It is the City's position that the moratorium remains in effect at this time while the City seeks clarification of the decision on the moratorium and considers whether to appeal if the Order is not clarified as we request, and that the City will not accept subdivision applications. Given the question concerning the validity of the current subdivision moratorium and because the City is still considering potential modifications to its subdivision ordinance, the City Council may wish to consider adopting a new ordinance imposing a moratorium on subdivisions in the R -1 District. I have prepared an ordinance for the Council's consideration. The ordinance is essentially the same as the subdivision moratorium ordinance adopted on July 6, 2004 (Ordinance No. 2004 -09) and provides for the moratorium to renew in effect until July 6, 2005 unless earlier termination or extended by the Council. July 6, 2005 is the same date on which the moratorium imposed by Ordinance No. 2004 -09 terminates. DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP ORDINANCE NO. 2005-2 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING A MORATORIUM ON THE PLATTING, REPLATTING OR SUBDIVISION OF LOTS AND OTHER PROPERTY WITHIN THE SINGLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT (R -1) IN THE CITY OF EDINA THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Purpose. Pursuant to applicable Minnesota Statutes, Edina is now conducting studies for the purpose of considering adoption and/or amendment of official controls, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.352, Subdivision 15, including amendment of Section 810 of the City Code (the "Subdivision Ordinance'). The official controls and amendments being studied will consider, among other things, the desirability and suitability of, and the requirements and conditions for, the processing and approval of plats, replats, subdivisions of lots and other property within any Single Family Dwelling District (R -1) in the City, as designated by Section 850 of the City Code. However, while the new official controls and amendments are being considered, proposals for, and applications for such plats, replats and subdivisions continue to be made. Therefore, in order to protect the planning process and the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Edina, it is necessary and desirable to impose the following moratorium pursuant to the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.355, Subd. 4. Section 2. Moratorium. From the effective date of this ordinance to and including July 6, 2005, subject to earlier termination or extension by the Edina City Council, the Edina City Council, the Edina Planning Commission and the Edina City staff shall not accept any applications for, or continue to process or act on, any applications or requests for, any plats, replats or subdivisions of lots or other property within the Single Dwelling Unit District (R -1) in the City as designated by Section 850 of the City Code; provided, however, that the City Council may disapprove any application for any such plat, replat or subdivision solely to prevent approval thereof by operation of law pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.358, Subd. 3b. This moratorium shall not apply to any lot division as provided in Section 810.04, Subd. 2 of the City Code, or to any subdivision application previously given preliminary approval by the City Council. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor OORSEY DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP PERRY M. WILSON, III (612) 340.8722 FAX (612) 340 -8856 February 8, 2005 VIA U.S. MAIL The Honorable Heidi S. Schellhas Judge of Hennepin County District Court C -1020 Hennepin County Government Center 300 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55487 Fax No. 612 - 348 -5374 Re: Pedersen v. City of Edina CT 04 -12072 Dear Judge Schellhas: We represent the City of Edina in the above - referenced matter, and I am writing Your Honor to seek clarification of one point in connection with the Court's Order dated January 26, 2005. Your Honor's clerk suggested that the request for clarification first take place through a letter seeking clarification rather than a formal motion. Paragraph 50 of the Order makes reference to the City's moratorium on subdivision applications. The City thinks that the Order only intended to invalidate the moratorium as to Pedersen's lot subdivision application. The City believes that the Order did not intend to invalidate the moratorium as it applies to all other subdivision applications submitted to the City. The City requests that the Order be clarified to read that the City of Edina's moratorium on subdivision applications is valid except as to Plaintiff Pedersen's lot subdivision application. A clarification of this issue would be of great benefit to the City as it proceeds with its community planning and development and the clarification will avoid the need to enact a new moratorium. have spoken with Plaintiff, Mr. Pedersen, and do not believe from our conversations that Mr. Pedersen has any objection to this requested clarification, however, I do not speak for Mr. Pedersen. DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP • WWW.DORSEY.COM • T 612.340.2600 • F 612.340.2868 SUITE 1500 • 50 SOUTH SIXTH STREET • MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 -1498 USA GANAOA EUROPE ASIA OORSEY The Honorable Heidi S. Schellhas February 8, 2005 Page 2 If Your Honor requires any further information or would prefer to discuss this matter with the parties by a conference call, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your attention to this matter. V r kv y ouurs, Perry M Wilson, III cc: Brad Pedersen bcc: Mr. Craig Larson Mr. Gordon Hughes Jerome P. Gilligan, Esq. Heather C. Toff, Esq. DORSEY 6 WHITNEY LLP TO: FROM: VIA: Mayor & City Council REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Public Works Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: February 15, 2005 AGENDA ITEM IV. A. ITEM DESCRIPTION: One Articulated Loader. Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. St. Joseph Equipment (State Contract #432520) 1. $ 175,559.93 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: St. Joseph Equipment $ 175,559.93 GENERAL INFORMATION: This purchase is for a new articulated loader with plow attachment that will replace a 1995 articulated loader — Unit #25.460, which will be sold at auction. This purchase is through the State of Minnesota Purchasing Program and will be funded through the Public Works Equipment Replacement Budget. lignature The Recommended Bid is ZY within budget not Public Works - Streets Department Gordon Hughes, City G:Wdministration \CORRPW \RFP - LoadersVp 021505 loader.doc e o REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor Hovland and Members of the City Council FROM: John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: February 15, 2005 AGENDA ITEM: I.Y. B. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Workman Utility Vehicle — Braemar Golf Course Compan y Amount of Quote or Bid 1. MTI Distributing Company 1.$16,117.71 2. Davis Sun Turf 2. $16,795.00 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Account #5400.1740 MTI Distributing Company $16,117.71 (includes sales tax) GENERAL INFORMATION: This is for purchase of a 2005 Toro Workman model 3200 utility vehicle for Braemar Golf Course. This utility vehicle is used for a variety of maintenance tasks such as hauling sod, soils, tools and equipment. The 4- wheeled vehicle comes equipped with a hydraulic dump box, 31 -horse power liquid cooled engine, two -wheel drive, 3 -speed transmission, and has a two -year warranty. This new utility vehicle replaces a 1989 Cushman Truckster that will be sold at public auction. This purchase is funded under the Maintenance Equipment Replacement budget within the Capital Improvement Plan, which is budgeted for $125,000 in 2005. Edina Park and Recreation John os, Director Department This Recommended bid is within budget not within budget A-L W // Hughes, City o e �y REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Craig Larsen City Planner Date: February 15, 2005 Subject: Resolution 2005 -13 Supporting 1-494 Improvement „ o Recommendation: Adopt attached Resolution. Information /Background: The 1-494 Commission is requesting that member City Councils adopt this resolution supporting increased state funding for transportation improvements. a m Agenda Item: V. A.' Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action: ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion „ o Recommendation: Adopt attached Resolution. Information /Background: The 1-494 Commission is requesting that member City Councils adopt this resolution supporting increased state funding for transportation improvements. a m RESOLUTION 2005 -13 RESOLUTION ENCORAGING LEGISLATION TO INCREASE FUNDING FOR I494 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS City of Edina WHEREAS, the cities of Bloomington, Edina, Eden Prairie, Minnetonka, Plymouth and Richfield have joined together to promote improvement of I-494 from the Minnesota River to I -94 in order to increase road capacity and to improve the productivity and convenience of residents and businesses throughout the region; and WHEREAS, funding for improvements to the I-494 corridor, the Twin Cities metropolitan region and greater Minnesota has not kept pace with growth and demand; and WHEREAS, accelerating the scheduled expansion of I -494 is a common and high priority objective of the I-494 Corridor Coalition communities; and WHEREAS, the I-494 corridor is at overcapacity in many locations; the cost of traffic congestion along the corridor is $100 million per year, and congestion is expected to double in the next 20 years; and, WHEREAS, these costs and the ramifications of congestion are an impediment to business development, economic growth, and reduce the overall quality of life in the metropolitan area, . WHEREAS, transportation funding, in inflation adjusted dollars, has declined by more that 25 percent over the past decade, transit is funded at 65 percent of that in similarly sized regions, and planners and government officials estimate that $700 million to $1 billion in improvements per year is needed over the next decade to simply keep up with anticipated congestion, NOW,. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA that this Council supports legislation to decrease congestion and increase the state revenues available for improvements .to the I-494 corridor and other metropolitan,, transportation systems including an increase in the state gas tax, dedication of 100 percent of -the Motor Vehicle Sales Tax for transportation purposes, an increase in the license tab fee, a regional sales tax option, increased trunk highway and general fund bonding and increased use of voluntary toll lanes. Attest ADOPTED: the 15th day of February 2005. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA 1 James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular,meeting of February 15, 2005, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2005. nahra A ManganW Caark City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET - FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 WWW.cityofedina.com TTY 952 -826 -0379 Al911�1r ye Nov � To: Mayor & City Council From: Solvei Wilmot Recycling Coordinator Date:, Feb 15, 2005 Subject: Resolution Authorizing the City to enter into a Grant Agreement with Hennepin County. REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item # V.B. Consent Z' Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action 0, Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Adopt a Resolution authorizing the City of Edina to enter into a three year agreement with Hennepin County to accept funding for the Edina Recycling Program. Info /Background: The City of Edina recycling program applies for grant money through the Hennpin County SCORE (Select Committee on Recycling and the Environment) Fund. In order to be eligible to receive the monies, Edina must enter into an agreement to receive the funds and use them for the residential recycling program. The amount of the grant money has not yet been determined. In 2004, Edina received $111,774 from the grant. It is anticipated that Edina will receive slightly less in 2005 due to a reduced amount available from the grant. „ 0 RESOLUTION NO. 2005-11 AUTHORIZING THE CITY TO ENTER INTO A 2005 -2007 MUNICIPAL RECYCLING o GRANT AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY City of Edina WHEREAS, the City of Edina operates a recycling program consistent with Minnesota Statutes 115A.02 and 115A.03, as amended by the Laws of Minnesota 1992, Chapter, 685, and Minnesota Statutes, 473.8011; and WHEREAS, the Edina Recycling Program is consistent with the Office of Environmental Assistance Solid Waste Management Development Guide /Policy Plan, the Hennepin County Solid Waste Master Plan; and the Hennepin County's Residential Recycling Funding Policy; and WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Board has adopted a Resolution authorizing funding for Municipal Recycling Programs. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Edina City Council that the Mayor and th( City Manager enter into an Agreement with Hennepin County to accept funding for the Edina Recycling Program. ' Attest Adopted this 15th day of February 2005. Debra A. Manaen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA 1 James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of February 15; 2005, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this day of 2005. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 �,'91N�11.rj,, ow e �y° 0 REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To:. MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item V.C. From:. GORDON. L. HUGHES Consent ❑ CITY MANAGER Information Only ❑ Date: FEBRUARY 15, 2005 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To. HRA ® To. Council Subject: BOARDS /COMMISSIONS ❑ Motion SURVEY ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ® Discussion INFORMATION/BACKGROUND: On February 1, 2005, the Council asked me to survey neighboring communities with respect to their policies /ordinances concerning appointments to city boards and commissions. In accordance with your request, we inquired as follows: • Has your city established term limits for service on boards and commissions and, if so, what is the limit? • Does your City have an attendance policy or ordinance with respect to board and commission members and, if so, what is the requirement? By way of background, Edina does not limit years of service on boards and commissions, but does have an attendance ordinance. This ordinance (Section 180 of the City Code) provides that the Mayor with consent of the Council may remove a member who fails to attend three consecutive meetings, whether regular or special, or who fails to attend four meetings in a calendar year. Prior to this provision, City ordinances required automatic removal for failure to attend meetings. In REPORT/RECOMMENDATION - BOARDS /COMMISSIONS SURVEY February 18, 2005 Page two 1990, the Council eased the requirement to allow discretion based on the individual circumstances of the member. I have attached e-mail responses received from the cities of Bloomington, St. Louis Park, Minnetonka and Eden Prairie. Summaries of the responses are as follows: BLOOMINGTON. Board and commission members °are limited to six consecutive years of service on a particular board or commission. After serving six years, a member could take a year off and theoretically be eligible for appointment again. However, this apparently has not occurred. Members who fail to attend 75% of all boards and commission meetings annually are automatically removed from their seat. Meeting attendance counts only if the member is present for at least 2/3 of the meeting.) ST. LOUIS PARK. No term limits. No fixed requirement for attendance. However, their policy states that "continued. absenteeism is considered grounds for dismissal by the council." Also "performance and attendance" are considered for reappointment. MINNETONKA. Board and commission members are limited to eight consecutive years of service on a particular board or commission. Unlike Bloomington, it seems that members who have served eight years may not be reappointed even if they take a year off. Members who fail to attend 80 % of the regular,meetings may be removed from their seat. EDEN PRAIRIE. A board and commission member who has served six consecutive years may be reappointed, but only upon unanimous approval of the City Council. No formal policy on attendance. However, the Council considers attendance at the time of reappointment. I trust that this is responsive to your questions. your request. I will be happy to provide more information at 19 Page 1. of 2 Gordon Hughes From: Karen Kraemer [kkraemer @ci.bloomington.mn.us] Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 9:40 AM To: Gordon Hughes Subject: RE: City Boards and Commissions Yes, the commissioner could take a year (or more) off and reapply. We haven't faced this yet and it would be Council's decision to reappoint. They certainly are welcome to apply for appointrnent to a different commission once they have completed a six -year max on commission. Also, and this gets confusing, if a person resigns from an unexpired term, the person appointed to that seat serves through the appointment calendar year, then is reappointed to a new term the following January; i.e. Joe Jones was appointed in August 2004 to a vacated term due to expire 12/31/05. At the Council's Organizational Meeting in January, 2005, Joe is appointed to a new term that will now expire 12/31/06. The time he served in 2004 does not count toward his 6 -year maximum. I've attached the Council's appointment guidelines for your review. Thank you! Karen Karen Kraemer Office of the City Manager City of Bloomington, MN 952 - 563 -8785 kkraemer0ci. bloomington. mn.us Fax:952- 563 -8754 >>> "Gordon Hughes" <GHughes @ci.edina.mn.us> 02/03/05 9:28 AM >>> Thanks Karen. Does the six year limit apply for the life of the commissioner? In other words, can you serve six years, take a year off, and then serve another six years? - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Karen Kraemer [ mailto :kkraemer @ci.bloomington.mn.us] Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 4:02 PM To: Gordon Hughes Cc: Mark Bernhardson Subject: Re: City Boards and Commissions Hi Gordy - Mark has asked me to respond to your questions regarding advisory boards /commissions. • Yes, we have a limit of 6 years on any one commission. • Yes, board members /commissioners must meet a 75% attendance annually. The staff liaisons submit a quarterly attendance roster to the Council. Please let me know if you have further questions or would like a copy of the actual ordinance section. Thank you, Karen Kraemer Karen Kraemer Office of the City Manager City of Bloomington, MN 2/4/2005 Page 2 of 2 952- 563 -8785 kkraemer(dci. bloomington.mn.us Fax:952- 563 -8754 >>> "Gordon Hughes" <GHughes @ci.edina.mn.us> 02/02/05 11:48 AM >>> Greetings from the Emerald City! My City Council has asked me to survey some of our neighboring communities with respect to your Council- appointed boards and commissions. We have two questions: * Has your City established term limits for service on boards and commissions and if so, what is the limit? * Does your City have an attendance policy or ordinance with respect to board and commission members and if so, what is the requirement? Thanks in advance for taking the time to respond. 2/4/2005 BLOOMINGTON CITY COUNCIL ADVISORY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS APPOINTMENTS GUIDELINE NEw APPLICANTS: 1. All applicants must be residents of the City of Bloomington. 2. Advertising seeking nominees will begin in the later part of October via the local community newspaper, The Briefing City newsletter, and City cable television. 3. Application forms are available through the City Manager's Office, and the respective departments /divisions responsible for the overseeing of individual boards /commissions. 4. Applications for terms expiring on 12/31 of any given year will be accepted through December 15 of that same year. Applicants who mail an application after the due date will be sent a letter informing them their application will not be considered at the Organizational Meeting, but will be retained on file for consideration should a vacancy occur during the year. Applications will continue to be accepted throughout the year for consideration of appointment if a vacancy should occur during that calendar year. 5. Applicants may apply for more than one commission, based on their background and interests. However, applicants are requested to complete a separate application for each commission they wish to be considered for. 6. The Council will review the applications and contact applicants for further background information, or to respond to any questions they may have, prior to the Council consideration of nomination. RE- APPOINTMENTS: CURRENT APPLICATIONS ON FILE: 1. Individuals serving on a board or commission with a term expiring 12/31, but who are eligible for reappointment (having served less than 6 consecutive years), and have expressed their desire to serve another term, could be re- appointed at the Council's organizational meeting in January. Reappointments are subject to a minimum attendance of 75% of all board/commission meetings, annually. A member must be present for at least two- thirds (2/3) of an entire commission meeting in order to qualify as having attended the meeting. An advisory board/commission member will be automatically removed from their seat for failing to comply with the 75% attendance requirement. If an individual is removed from a commission for failing to meet the attendance requirements he /she must wait one full year from date of removal before being considered for reappointment to the same commission or a new commission. Reappointment or a new appointment will be based on the individual meeting eligibility criteria. 2. Current applicants on file (but not appointed) receive a letter in October asking them if they wish to be considered for appointment for the next calendar year. If they wish to be considered, they are asked to submit a new application. APPORn'N ENT PROCESS: 1. Appointments to expired terms or terms vacant at year -end take place at the Council's organizational meeting each January. Throughout the year, as vacancies occur, the Council will consider nominations from applications on file. 2. The Council may choose to make nominations and appointment(s) at the same meeting. 3. Applicants for each board/commission should be considered, whenever possible, from various districts throughout the City to allow for City-wide representation. 4. Once appointments are made, an orientation session will be held for newly appointed individuals to familiarize them with City staff, the function of the City departments versus advisory commissions, responsibilities and procedures of an advisory board/commission, education on the Open Meeting Law, and receive an overview of their commission's purpose, attendance requirements, meeting dates, etc. from the staff liaison to that particular commission. 5. Individuals who are appointed receive a letter from the City Clerk's Office regarding taking the oath of office and a letter of congratulations from the Mayor's Office. Applicants who are not appointed receive a letter of appreciation for their interest from the Mayor's Office, and their application will be retained on file for one year (see #2 under Reappointments). OTHER: 1. Every 3 years, an evaluation of a commission's role and function will be conducted by a sub - committee of the City Council, including review of goals, areas of focus, function, role, etc. 2. Advisory boards /commissions will submit annual reports and work plans to the Council. 3. During the year, applications will continue to be received, and placed on file for consideration should a vacancy occur mid -year. Adopted by City Council: 01/29/96 Amended: 4/7/97, 12/15/97, 4/20/98, 7/6/98, 12/2/02 A 'Gordon Hughes From: Cindy Reichert [CREICHERT @stlouispark.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 2:56 PM To: Gordon Hughes Cc: Tom Harmening Subject: SLP Board and Commission Policies Rules and DMSION 4.doc wedures - Res 03 -. Hello, Gordon. Tom Harmening asked me to respond to your inquiry about boards and commissions. We do not have term limits for service on any of our boards and Commissions. Also, in regards to our attendance policy, the policy includes some general language that reads, "Regular attendance at meetings is a requirement for continued membership on any board or commission. Irregular attendance and frequent absences are detrimental to the entire group and put undue pressure on those members who do attend meetings. Regular attendance allows members to learn about and discuss issues in depth which contributes to more effective decision making. Continued absenteeism is considered grounds for dismissal by the council ". I have attached the ordinance establishing the parks and recreation advisory commission as an example. All of the ordinances establishing our various commissions contain almost identical language. I have also attached a copy of the policies and procedures as adopted by our city council. Let me know if you have other questions. Cindy Reichert, City Clerk (952) 928 2840 1 RESOLUTION NO. 03-143 A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION #01 -023 RULES AND PROCEDURES FOR . BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS WHEREAS, the St. Louis Park City Council has established certain boards and commissions to serve as advisory to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes its various boards and commissions to comply with all regulations to which they are subject concerning conduct of meetings including those provisions contained in the Minnesota State Statutes, the City Charter and the Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, The attached rules and procedures serve as a guideline for operating those boards and commissions and set standards for the conduct of. staff and commission members. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of St. Louis Park hereby amends the "Rules and Procedures for Boards and Commissions" attached as Exhibit A and shall adhere to the rules as stated therein unless revised by a majority vote of the City Council. Reviewed for Administration: City Manager Attest: City Clerk Adopted by the City Council October 7, 2003 Mayor F Rules and Procedures for Boards and Commissions Adopted as Appendix A to Resolution No. 03 -143 October 7, 2003 A. Boards The St. Louis Park City Charter grants the council authority to form various boards and commissions by ordinance. Boards and commissions serve in an advisory capacity to the city council and are conferred various degrees of decision making power. The City Council is the sole policy making body of the city. Some boards and commissions include in their membership persons appointed by the school board. Boards and commissions of the city which have been created by ordinance are as follows: • Board of Zoning Appeals • Charter Commission) • Economic Development Authority 2 • Housing Authority • Human Rights Commission • Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission • Planning Commission • Police Advisory Commission • Telecommunications. Commission In addition, other ad hoc groups may be formed as needed by resolution of the council. B. Staff Liaisons Each board and commission is assigned a staff liaison. Duties of the staff liaison are, in general, to facilitate or assist in the meetings, to record attendance and to provide information and direction as requested by the commission. It is also the responsibility of the staff liaison to inform the city council of any problems or issues that may arise. C. Membership Membership requirements are set by ordinance. All board and commission members are appointed by the council or, in some cases, by the school board. Youth members may be appointed and are conferred voting status except in the case of the Planning Commission and Board of Zoning Appeals. 1 The Charter Commission operates under the same rules and procedures with certain exceptions: Charter Commission members apply to and are appointed by the District Court and are created by and subject to provisions dictated by state statute rather than city ordinance. The ordinance creating the Economic Development Authority (EDA) specifies that the membership of the EDA will be comprised of the current membership of the City Council. D. Qualifications Members must be St. Louis Park residents, but need not have expertise in any particular area. Willingness to serve and be involved are the most important attributes of members. Per Resolution #01 -078, the city council will not consider applications for appointment to advisory commissions from regular full -time or part-time employees. E. Attendance Regular attendance at meetings is a requirement for continued membership on any board or commission. Irregular attendance and frequent absences are detrimental to the entire group and put undue pressure on those members who do attend meetings. Regular attendance allows members to learn about and discuss issues in depth which contributes to more effective decision making. Continued absenteeism is considered grounds for dismissal by the council. F. By -Laws Each board and commission shall create their own by -laws and meeting procedures. Copies of the by -laws should be forwarded to the city manager's office whenever changes are made. G. Meetings Meeting times and locations are set according to each commission's by -laws. A quorum of the board is made up of a majority of members currently appointed. All meetings will be conducted in accordance with the Minnesota Open Meeting Law, the City Charter and the Municipal Code of Ordinances. The proceedings of the meetings should be conducted using standard parliamentary procedure. The City Council has adopted The Standard Code of Parliamentary Procedure, as their guide and that publication is available in the clerk's office. A simplified summary of these procedures is also available for use by commission chairs and staff liaisons. H. Minutes and other Records Minutes of each meeting should be prepared and maintained by the staff liaison or designee. Following commission approval minutes should be forwarded.to the city clerk's office for placement on the city council agenda.. All board and commission records must be maintained in accordance with the city's records retention policy. Please contact the city clerk's office if you have questions regarding retention and preferred storage medium. I. Annual Report Each board or commission must report to the council once per year. A written report should be prepared which includes activities undertaken in the past year and goals for the coming year. council will then meet with the group in a study session to discuss the report and other issues of concern to the commission. The report should be submitted to council for review prior to the study session meeting. J. Recruitment When a vacancy occurs it is the responsibility of the staff liaison to inform the city manager's office of the vacancy. Recruitment is typically done using any combination of advertising opportunity available. Local newspaper, Park Perspective, direct mailing, neighborhood newsletter, the city's website, etc. are all acceptable forms of advertisement. Applications are maintained by the city manager's office and are forwarded to interested citizens upon request. In certain instances a supplemental application may be created to determine suitability of candidates. Upon receipt of the application a representative of the city manager's office will contact the applicant to acknowledge receipt of the application and to discuss the interview and appointment process. Applications will be retained in the active file one year following receipt. K. Candidate Review Process Written applications are forwarded to councilmembers for review as openings occur. Councilmembers will inform the city manager's office of the candidates they wish to interview based upon their review of written materials. Interviews are conducted by the city council, usually prior to a Monday evening meeting. Following the interview the city manager's office will mail a thank you letter to each applicant with information regarding next steps in the process. L. Appointment Appointments are made by the city council at a regular meeting of the council. Council will inform the city manager's office when an appointment is to be made so that the appointment can be added to the city council agenda. Following the appointment the city manager's office will contact the new member and inform them of their appointment. A copy of the application will also be forwarded to the staff liaison. The staff liaison will provide the new member with meeting information and discuss expectations and pertinent issues with them prior to the next meeting of the board or commission. Appointments are sometimes made to unexpired terms, and often more than one vacancy exists on a commission. In that case, the specific term occupied by the new member is determined by the commission and communicated to the city manager's office. M. Rosters The staff liaison is responsible for keeping an up to date roster of the commission which should include contact information, term of office and date of appointment. When information on the roster changes, a change form should be completed and forwarded to the city manager's office. N. Reappointment Reappointments are made as needed by the city council. Performance and attendance by Board and Commission members requesting reappointment will be considered by the Council. Council may choose to reinterview any commission member as a means to determine whether the commission member should continue to serve. A member may continue to serve beyond their expiration date until a reappointment is made. O. Resignation When a resignation occurs, a change form should be completed and forwarded to the city - manager's office along with a copy of any correspondence that may have been received. The city manager's office will then initiate recruitment to fill the vacant position. A member may continue to serve beyond their expiration date until a successor is appointed.. P. Recognition At the beginning of each year council will recognize members who have left their position during the prior year. The city and school volunteer coordinators will plan appreciation activities for all commission members every two years. DIVISION 4. PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY COADMSSION* Sec. 2 -241. Membership; terms. (a) Function; composition. The parks and recreation advisory commission shall be an advisory commission to the city council. It shall consist of seven regular members and one youth member, all appointed as set forth in this section. (b) Regular members. Four regular members of the commission shall be appointed by the city council for three -year terms. Three regular members shall be appointed by and serve at the pleasure of the Board of Independent School District No. 283 for a three -year term. Failure of such school board to appoint its membership to serve on the parks and recreation advisory commission shall in no way affect the validity of the proceedings of the parks and recreation advisory commission. The terms of regular members shall expire on December 31 of the third year of such term and until a successor is duly appointed and qualified. Subsequent appointments shall be for three -year terms. In the event of a vacancy, the city council shall appoint a person to complete the unexpired term. A member of the commission may be removed with or without cause by the city council. (c) Youth member. One voting youth who shall be a high school student of a private or public school located in the city may be appointed by the city council and serve a term of one year. (d) Qualifications.. Regular members of the parks and recreation advisoryy commission shall be qualified voters and residents of the city. The regular member appointed by the Board of Independent School District No. 283 of St. Louis Park shall also be a resident of the school district. A vacancy shall deem to exist if a member ceases to meet the residency requirements. All members of the commission shall be appointed from persons who have demonstrated an interest in the parks and recreation advisory commission by submission of appropriate city forms. (Code 1976, § 1 -310) Sec. 2-242. Organization. (a) A staff liaison to the parks and recreation advisory commission shall be appointed by the city manager and shall be subject to the administrative rules and regulations of the city. (b) The commission shall elect its own chair and vice- chair. Subject to such limitations as may be imposed by the city council at any time, the commission shall provide its own rules and procedure, determine the date and time of meetings and, upon proper notice, shall call public hearings when necessary and desirable and in accordance with all requirements of local and state laws. The bylaws of the commission and amendments shall be submitted to the city council upon their adoption. Such bylaws and any amendments shall be deemed to be approved by the city council unless the city council takes action to modify such bylaws or amendments within 30 days after submission. No member of the commission shall consider or vote upon any question in which the member is directly or indirectly interested. (c) The commission shall keep proper records of its proceedings, and such records shall be maintained by the staff liaison or the liaison's designee. (Code 1976, § 1 -311) Sec. 2 -243. Expense of members. The members of the parks and recreation advisory commission shall serve without pay but may be reimbursed for actual expenses to the extent that funds therefor are provided in the annual city budget p +nt adopted by the city council. The commission shall properly account for its receipts and expenditures of monies in accordance with established city. procedures. (Code 1976,.§ 1 -312) Sec. 2 -244. Powers and duties. The parks and recreation advisory commission shall have the following powers and duties to: (1) Consider matters pertaining to public recreation programs in the city; (2) Evaluate the city's current parks and recreation programs and desires of citizens for such services; (3) Keep. acquainted with the current state, regional and national parks and recreation standards for communities; (4) Recommend programs and a budget of programs and expenditures for operations of the parks and recreation department; (5) Studyy and recommend long range parks and recreation plans for the city; (6) Submit to the city council. by April 1 of each year an annual report of the activities of the commission during the previous year; and (7) Act in an advisory capacity. to the city council in all matters which are requested by the city council. (Code 1976, § 1 -313) Boards and Commissions Gordon Hughes From: Kathy Magrew [kmagrew @eminnetonka.com] Sent: Thursday, February 03, 200510:29 AM To: Gordon Hughes. Subject: RE: Boards and Commissions Page 1 of 1 Gordon, I would say that they could not —at least, it hasn't happened. However, we do have commissioners serve eight years on one board, and then move on to another. Kathy - - -- -Original Message---- - From: Gordon Hughes [mailto:GHughes @ci.edina.mn.us] Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 10:26 AM To: Kathy Magrew Subject: RE: Boards and Commissions Just a quick follow up. Can a commissioner serve eight years, take a year off, and then be eligible for reappointment again? - -Original Message---- - From: Kathy Magrew [ mailto:kmagrew @eminnetonka.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 4:41 PM To: Gordon Hughes Cc: John Gunyou Subject: Boards and Commissions Gordon, Attached is Minnetonka's policy concerning boards and commissions. Our policy does address term limits (see Maximum Participation), and attendance standards (must attend 80% of regular meetings). Let me know if you have problems with the attachment or if you have additional questions. Kathleen Magrew City Clerk / Assistant to the City Manager City of Minnetonka 14600 Minnetonka Boulevard Minnetonka, MN 55345 0:, 952.939.8218 F: 952.939.8244 kmagrew @eminnetonka.com <<Council Policy 1.02 - Appts to Bds, Comm.pdf>> 2/4/2005 City of Minnetonka City Council Policy. 1.2 Policy Number 1.2 Appointments to Boards, Committees, and Commissions Purpose of Policy: This policy establishes a procedure for appointments, guidelines for operation and representation, and clarification of relationships between appointed boards, committees, and commissions, the city council and city staff. Introduction This policy applies to all boards, committees, and commissions appointed by the city council unless otherwise prescribed. The city council will strive to adhere to the following standards when appointing members to the various boards, committees, and commissions. Effectiveness The city council appoints boards, committees, and commissions because: • They allow greater participation in the government by its citizenry; • They assist the city council in absorbing an ever increasing legislative workload that may be otherwise impossible for a part-time city council to complete; and • They can provide an expert or independent opinion on areas, thus offering the city council an additional source of advice. To achieve these purposes, members of boards, committees, and commissions must be competent to perform their respective roles. While expertise in a particular area is not always necessary, the ability to participate as an equal with other members is essential. Therefore, members should possess the basic interest and skills to be effective. To enhance skill levels, staff assigned to each committee will be responsible for conducting an orientation session with all new members and for otherwise assisting the board, committee, or commission in carrying out its responsibilities. Representativeness Depending on the nature of the board, committee, or commission, it may be important to appoint a limited number of members who have special interest in the work of that body. This is particularly true for ad hoc committees, which are generally formed for specific purposes. For example, if a committee is formed to deal with issues facing the elderly, then clearly the committee should be well represented by the elderly and persons with a background dealing with the elderly. Gender representativeness should be achieved whenever possible. Nondiscrimination Persons being considered for appointment to a board, committee, or commission will not be disqualified based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, handicap, political affiliation or belief, veteran status, sexual preference, status with regard to public Page 1 of 3 City of Minnetonka . City Council Policy 1.2 assistance, and marital status. Geographic Balance While the competence and representativeness criteria are more important, to the extent feasible, boards, commissions, and committees should have a reasonable geographic balance from the community. Maximum Participation In order to allow maximum opportunity for participation on the various boards, commissions, and committees, incumbents will not be reappointed to a board, commission or committee if they have already served eight consecutive years on that body. It will be the policy of the city council to follow the steps outlined hereafter regarding citizen boards, committees, and commissions: Appointments Names of persons willing to serve the city in this capacity will be obtained by advertising in local news sources and the Minnetonka Memo. These notices should occur at least twice per year. The city manager's office will maintain a record of all city boards and commissions and their membership, and will notify the city council of any vacancies as they occur. The mayor and city council will receive a copy of the applications on file for the vacancy or vacancies being considered. The mayor will recommend all appointments. They will be confirmed by at least a majority vote of the city council at a regular meeting. Residency will be considered as a basic criterion for appointment whenever possible. Guidelines for Operations Members of citizen boards, committees, and commissions, are expected to attend a minimum of 80% of the regular meetings. Failure to meet the requirement or to attend three consecutive regular meetings may result in removal. The city manager will assign a staff member to provide assistance and information to each board, committee, or commission. Responsibility for work direction will remain with the city manager. The staff will provide orientation for all new members that includes review of enabling legislation, legal responsibilities, parliamentary rules, historical perspective on the work of the committee, agenda of prospective issues, and any other material appropriate to the work of that committee. The city will provide an annual seminar for all board, committee, and commission members to enhance their effectiveness. Board, committee and commission members will not receive compensation for service or Page 2 of 3 r City of Minnetonka City. Council Policy 1.2 expenses unless specifically authorized by the city council. Each board, committee, and commission will submit a written annual report to the city council. That report will be presented at a city council work session. This statement is intended as a general guide to be followed by the city council. It is not binding.and may be modified by the city council as it sees fit at its sole discretion. Adopted by Resolution No. 89 -8837 Council Meeting of March' 27, 1989 Amended by Resolution No. 2001 -037 Council Meeting of April 16, 2001 Amended by Resolution No. 2003 -077 Council Meeting of August 25, 2003 Page 3 of 3 Gordon Hughes From: Michael Barone [MBarone @edenprairie.org] Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 8:41 AM To: Gordon Hughes Subject: RE: City Boards and Commissions Gordon- For your question on term limits for Commissions, we do have a policy that states that if a Commission member has served two consecutive full -terms (a full term is 3 years), they are still eligible to serve on a Commission, but in order to be reappointed, the vote on that person's appointment would need to be a unanimous 5 - 0 vote of the City Council. Other than that, there are no other limits on terms for serving on a board or commission in Eden Prairie. For attendance, we don't have a formal policy on a set number of meetings that you are allowed to miss, or a set percentage of the meetings that you are allowed to miss. We do provide the attendance information from the Board or Commission staff liaison when it comes time to do reappointments, and the Council can consider poor attendance as a reason to not reappoint; as they do have some discretion on what they believe is poor attendance - - but there is no standard to be measured against. Hope this helps. If you have any other questions, please contact me directly. Regards. Michael Barone Assistant to the City Manager City of Eden Prairie Phone 952 - 949 -8433 mbarone @edenprairie.org - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Scott Neal Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 11:55 AM To: Michael Barone Subject: FW: City Boards and Commissions Mike, Please take a look at this and prepare a short response for Gordon. Thanks, - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Gordon Hughes [mailto:GHughes @ci.edina.mn.us] Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 11:48 AM To: BERNHARDSON MARK (E- mail); John Gunyou (E- mail); Scott Neal; Tom Harmening (E -mail) Cc: Deb Mangen Subject: City Boards and Commissions Greetings from the Emerald City! My City Council has asked me to survey some of our neighboring communities with respect to your Council- appointed boards and commissions. We have two questions: * Has your City established term limits for service on boards and commissions and if so, what is the limit? 1 * Does your City have an attendance policy or ordinance with respect to board and commission members and if so, what is the requirement? Thanks in advance for taking the time to respond. 2 i ' o W% F `bye REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # V. D. From: Boyd Tate Consent ❑ Traffic Safety Coordinator Information Only ❑ Date: February 15, 2005 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: Traffic Safety Staff Review for ® To Council February 3, 2005 Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Review and approve Traffic Safety Staff Review of Thursday, February 3, 2005. Info /Background: It is anticipated that residents will be in attendance at the Council meeting regarding the attached issue. G: \Infrastructure \Streets \traffic \Traffic Advisory Committee \Staff Review Summaries \05 TS AG & Min \rr 01- 10- 05.doc TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW THRUSDAY, FEBRUARY 3, 2005 The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on February 3, 2005. Staff present included the City Engineer, Traffic Engineer, Traffic Safety Coordinator, City Planner, Sign Coordinator, Traffic Safety Sergeant and Chief of Police. From that review, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They have also been informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the February 15, 2005 Council Agenda. SECTION A: Requests that staff recommends approval of request: None for the February 3, 2005 meeting. SECTION B: Requests that staff recommends denial of request: None for the February 3, 2005 meeting. SECTION C: Requests that are deferred to a later date or referred to others: 1. Request to remove the STOP signs on West 56th Street at Woodland Circle (west) that were installed at the direction of the Council on August 17, 2004 for a period of six months. The requestors live along West 56"' Street and are asking that the signs be removed. The requestors indicated that the signs, based on their observations, have not done anything to slow traffic on West 56th Street and have not made the neighborhood safer. The requestors indicated that as a direct result of the added stop signs, traffic now slows and breaks hard to stop at the signs, and then accelerates rapidly causing a substantial increase in the level of noise in their neighborhood. They indicated that they have observed many vehicles rolling through the stop signs or grossly ignoring them all together. Additionally, the requestors indicated they have observed vehicles violating the signs greater than 50% of the time and feel that safety on the street has been diminished as a result of adding the new STOP signs. IF Prior to August 2004, West 56th Street existed with east -west STOP signs at Brookview Avenue and France Avenue (and currently at Woodland Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 1 of 3 February 3, 2005 Circle- west). The north -south side streets between Brookview Avenue and France Avenue (Park Place, Woodcrest Drive and Woodland Circle west and east) are controlled with STOP signs. Sidewalks are not present in this area. History: A request was made in June 1997 to install STOP signs on West 56th Street at Park Place and in March 2001 to install STOP signs on West 56th Street at Woodland Circle. In April 2001, a traffic survey was performed on West 56th Street. The Monday thru Friday average daily traffic was 882 vehicles and the 85th- percentile speed was 32.3 mph. Of the 4410 vehicles in the survey, 31 vehicles (0.7 %) were recorded traveling at or over 40 mph. The request was denied by the City Council at the May 2001 meeting. Again, in June of 2004 several requests were made to install STOP signs on West 56th street at Park Place and /or Woodland Circle (west). Those requestors also live along West 56th Street and were concerned with the volume and speeds of traffic and the safety of pedestrians on West 56th Street. A traffic survey was performed in June -July 2004 on West 56th Street. The Monday thru Friday average daily traffic was 981 vehicles and the 85th- percentile speed was 31.7 mph. In summary, although the volume of vehicles increased since 2001, the 85th- percentile speed was actually lower (only 1.7 mph above the speed limit). There were no reported accidents since 1997 and intersection sight lines were determined to be acceptable. At the August 17, 2004 City Council meeting, staff recommended maintaining the existing STOP signs in their existing locations and denial of the request to install STOP signs (All -way Stops) at additional locations on West 56th Street for lack of warrants. Several residents who live on West 56th Street attended the August 17th meeting and voiced their concerns for neighborhood safety and encouraged the council to order the installation of STOP signs on West 56th Street at Woodland Circle (west). Following a Council discussion, the Mayor made a motion to reverse the recommendation of the Traffic Safety Committee and approve installation of STOP signs on West 56th Street at Woodland Circle (west) for a period of six months. The motion carried 3 (ayes) to 1, (nay). The STOP signs were installed as directed shortly thereafter. Subsequently, a request to remove the temporary STOP signs was made and on January 26, 2005, a letter was sent to the West 56th Street area residents informing them of the current request. Residents were informed Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 2 of 3 February 3, 2005 that the Traffic Safety Advisory Committee would be reviewing this issue and presenting their recommendation to the City Council at its regular meeting on Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. As a result of this letter, five a -mails and six phone calls were received from neighborhood residents requesting the City to leave the STOP signs in place. A traffic volume /speed survey has not been completed since the installation of the STOP signs. However, similar results are anticipated at this location in comparison to a similar situation /location in Edina where a traffic study was performed regarding an unwarranted STOP sign installation. The results of this study indicated that the STOP signs had an insignificant effect on the volume and speed of traffic (mid- block). The study's data showed a slight reduction in speed for the shorter block (approximately 1.0 mph) and a slight increase in speed for the longer block (approximately 0.3 mph). These insignificant results are anticipated to be very similar to the results that we would find for the shorter block east of the Woodland Circle intersection and the longer block west of the intersection. Existing STOP signs are present at every intersection within the referenced area. All -way STOP signs are not warranted in accordance with City policy and State guidelines. Engineering guidelines indicate that warranted STOP signs should be installed in a manner that minimizes the number of vehicles having to stop (the street carrying the lowest volume of traffic should be stopped). It is recommended that these guidelines be followed so that the meaning of traffic control devices is uniform through the City. Due to the relatively low 85th- percentile speed exceedance of the speed limit; no immediate alternative routes to divert the existing traffic that currently uses this roadway; and the adamant concerns of the applicants for the safety of the pedestrians and children in the referenced area, staff continues to recommend installation of sidewalks along West 56th Street. Studies show that streets with sidewalks on both sides of the streets have less than half the accidents compared to streets with no sidewalks. Additionally, due to the existing volume of traffic on this local street and the support of the neighborhood to address the perceived safety issues, staff makes the following recommendations: Staff recommends referral of this issue to the Transportation Commission for further consideration and implementation of possible traffic calming G• \Infrastructure \Streets \traffic \Traffic Advisory Committee \Staff Review Summaries \05 TS AG & Min \02 -03-05 TRAFFIC SAFETY review.doc Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 3 of 3 February 3, 2005 Aug. 3, 2004 Edina City Council Meeting Minutes Page 29 of 37 OF THE HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION Manager Hughes indicated the Human Relations Commission has recommended the adoption of Ordinance No. 850 -12, Amending Edina Code Section 140 to change the name of the Commission to the 'Edina Human Rights and Relations Commission'. They believe the name change was more in line with State law and the names of similar commissions. Staff recommends approval of the proposed name change. Melvin Ogurak, said during a study of the Commission's by -laws, it was realized that the name did not follow State law. The Commission requests approval of the name change as proposed. Member Housh asked if the mission of the Commission would remain the same. Mr. Ogurak said the mission would remain the same, only expanded with up- to -date law. Following a brief discussion, Member Hovland made a motion approving Ordinance No. 850 -12, Amending Edina Code Section 140 - Changing the Name of the Human Relations Commission to Edina Human Rights and Relations Commission, with a waiver of second reading as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 2004-12 ( AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SUBSECTION 140 RENAMING THE EDINA HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION The City Council of the City of Edina ordains: Section 1. Subsection 140.02 is hereby amended to read as follows: 11140.01 Establishment. To further accomplishment of the above policies, the Human Rights and Relations Commission (the Commission) is hereby established." Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect after its adoption and publication according to law. First Reading: August 17, 2004 Second Reading: Waived Publication: September 16, 2004 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Dennis F. Maetzold, Mayor Member Masica seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW OF AUGUST 5, 2004, APPROVED Assistant City Engineer Lillehaug explained that at the August 5, 2004, Traffic Safety meeting, several residents expressed an interest in participating in the Council meeting of August,17, 2004. He presented .a brief overview of the City's STOP sign policy and concluded that when STOP signs are used as speed breakers, and unwarrantly installed, a high incidence of drivers intentionally ignoring the STOP signs, creating a greater risk. Section B.2 - Request for STOP signs on West 50 Street at Woodland Circle and /or Park Place Mr. Lillehaug indicated a request to install STOP signs on West 56th Street at Woodland Circle (west) and /or Park Place was received stating a concern of high traffic volumes, high speeds, safety of pedestrians, and alleviating cut - through traffic. Staff recommends maintaining the existing STOP signs http: / /ci.edina.mn.us/ Pages/ CityCouncil _MeetingMinutes /20040817Reg.htm 2/8/2005 Aug. 3, 2004 Edina City Council Meeting Minutes Page 30 of 37 in their existing locations, denial of the request to install STOP signs at additional locations on West 56th Street for lack of warrants and referral of the issue to the Transportation Commission for further consideration and implementation of possible traffic calming measures. Laura Hemmer, 5601 Park Place, voiced concern with the traffic study taken during the summer months and suggested it be re -taken during the school year. 54th Street and 58th Street are less residential while 56th Street was residential and most driveways empty onto 56th Street. Member Hovland inquired whether sidewalks would be appropriate in the area. Ms. Hemmer said some residents were opposed to sidewalks. Engineer Houle reiterated that the Transportation Commission was working on a policy plan, which includes a neighborhood management plan for residents to study for traffic calming measures. Mayor Maetzold encouraged Ms. Hemmer to acquire a petition for sidewalks. Mike Sullivan, 81 Woodland Circle, said there must be concern with traffic in the area because of the previous traffic studies. He stated the area has charm that a sidewalk could alter and he asked that a solution be found. Mr. Sullivan inquired whether the City has any liability if a problem was not solved. Member Housh the City was attempting to find a process to deal with traffic. Scott Kelly, 96 Woodland Circle, suggested residents of 56th Street pay for the STOP signs at the recommended locations. If, in six months, traffic and speeds have increased, the signs could be pulled. Mr. Housh noted within the warrants STOP signs are not used to reduce volume or speed. Member Masica inquired whether a temporary STOP or YIELD sign could be installed. Mr. Houle noted that he would not recommend a YIELD sign as it was similar to a STOP sign and residents will still roll through the intersection. Mr. Housh again stated that the City was attempting to find a process to deal with traffic. Member Hovland asked what the timeline was for the Transportation Commission to consider traffic calming measures. Mr. Houle said if the Commission adopted the policy, and the Council recommends adoption proposed to be in October, and after the neighborhood applies, solutions would be sought during the winter for implementation in the summer. Following a Council discussion, Mayor Maetzold made a motion to reverse the decision of Section B.2, of the Traffic Safety Committee and approve installation of STOP signs on West 56th Street at Woodland Circle (west) and/or Park Place for a period of six months. Member Masica seconded the motion. Ayes: Hovland, Masica, Maetzold Nays: Housh Motion carried. Section B. 3 - Request to install a STOP sign on eastbound Hibiscus Avenue at West Shore Drive Assistant Engineer Lillehaug said a request was received from a resident on West Shore Drive south of Hibiscus Avenue with concerns of vehicle speeds and safety on West Shore Drive. The intersection was http: / /ci.edina.nm.us/ Pages/ CityCouncil _MeetingMinutes /20040817Reg.htm 2/8/2005 Page 1 of 1* Steve Lillehaug From: Gordon Hughes Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 11:27 AM To: 'Jim Hovland' Cc: Steve Lillehaug Subject: RE: stop sign on West 56th. _ Will do. I suspect that we may wish to route this first to the Traffic Safety Committee for their review and recommendation. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Jim Hovland [mailto:jhovland @krauserollins.com] Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 11:25 AM To: Gordon Hughes Subject: stop sign on West 56th. The above was supposed to be a temporary placement for 6 months. Can we have Steve provide a report on the same soon? I know the Meads and Hoigaards are not happy about the signs and I believe the Meads wrote to the Council in the past two weeks. Perry Mead has a follow -up call into me. James B. Hovland Krause & Rollins, Chartered 310 Groveland Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55403 (612) 874 -8550 (Fax) (612) 874 -9362 jhovland @krauserollins.com 1/6/2005 December 13, 2004 Steve Lillehaug Assistant City Engineer City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Traffic Stop Signs at 56th Street and Woodland Circle (West) Dear Mr. Lillehaug: A few months ago the City added a temporary stop signs on 56th Street at Woodland Circle (west). We would like to request the signs be removed because it has resulted in substantially increasing the noise level in our neighborhood. In addition, the new stop signs have not, based on our observation, done . anything to slow traffic on 56th Street or make the neighborhood safer. As a direct result of the added stop signs, traffic now breaks hard to stop at the signs, then accelerates rapidly as they continue forward on 56th Street. Through the action of stopping and accelerating the noise level from each passing vehicle is increased substantially. We noticed the increased noise from vehicle traffic on 56th Street immediately after the stop signs were installed, and other neighbors have commented the same. The addition of the stop sign has had the effect of changing a pastoral neighborhood to the sounds of a busy thoroughfare. As the City has found in previous studies, it is our observation the addition of the stop signs has not reduced the speed of traffic. We have observed many violations, from rolling through the stop signs to grossly ignoring the signs. We have observed violations approximating 50% or more of the time. Our view is safety on the street has been diminished as a result of adding the new stop signs on 56th Street. We respectfully request the City of Edina to remove the temporary stop signs on 56th Street. This is consistent with the Counsel's original action at the August 17, 2004 Regular Meeting, to review the decision after six months. The request is als nsistent with the original recommendation of the Traffic Safety Committee. 3 Please inform us of the action the City kN ill take or. our request. Thank you. Very sincerely, �4 "... Perry an Mary M Mead 80 Woodland Circle Edina, MN 55424 952- 929 -0148 (Home) 763 - 398 -6348 (Day) Cc: Dennis Maetzold, Mayor James B. Hovland, Counsel Member Gordon Hughes, City Manager January 26, 2005 West 56`h Street Area Residents Edina, Minnesota RE: Temporary Stop Signs on West 56th Street at Woodland Circle (west) Dear Resident: On August 17, 2004, the Edina City Council ordered the installation of temporary STOP signs on West 56`h Street at Woodland Circle (west) for a period of six months. Recently, the City has received requests to remove the temporary STOP signs due to the negative impacts and their ineffectiveness. The Traffic Safety Advisory Committee will be reviewing this issue and presenting its recommendation, to the City Council at its regular meeting on Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 7:OOp.m. Please contact me at 952- 826 -0349 or e-mail at btate@ci.edina.mn.us with any questions or comments. Sincerely, Boyd Tate Traffic Safety Coordinator Page 1 of 1 Boyd Tate To: DAVID & MIA LIEBL Subject: RE: Stop Sign on 56th and Woodland Circle Hello David & Mia Thank you for your e-mail. I will present it to the Traffic Safety Advisory Committee when we meet on 02 -03 -2005 at 10:00 a.m. I have received similar concerns from several of your neighbors. Boyd Tate Traffic Safety Coordinator City of Edina - - - -- Original Message---- - From: DAVID & MIA LIEBL [mailto:mliebl @msn.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 3:34 PM To: Boyd Tate Subject: Stop Sign on 56th and Woodland Circle Hi Boyd, I am a resident at the corner of 56th and Park Place, and I was very unhappy to hear the possible removal of the new stop sign. I have 3 young children and really appreciate the fact that it has definately slowed the traffic down coming from the East. Please let it be known that I am defmately in support of keeping that stop sign up. Sincerely, Mia M Liebl 2/2/2005 Message Boyd Tate From: Jeffrey A. Spizale [Jeffs @excelfixtures.com] Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 2:11 PM To: Sullivan, Michael P.; swkelley @mmm.com; maryk @northerntool.com; aspizale @preferredspeakers.com Cc: rbsullivan @riderlaw.com; Boyd Tate Subject: RE: Temporary Stop Sign at West 56th St. at Woodland Circle Mr. Tate, Page 1 of 3 I live across the street from the Sullivan's at 50 Woodland Circle. Each day I pick up my Son at his bus stop and I wait for him by the stop sign nearest to our house. I am there from 3:30- 4:00 each week day. I count on'average 5 -6 cars a minute stop at the signs, that is one car every ten seconds. That volume of traffic increases at other times. Cars coming off France avenue onto 56th street travel at extreme speeds and if the stop sign was not on that corner it would be anyone's guess how fast they would continue to go down 56th to Wooddale. That is why each day I wait at the bus stop. It is not safe for my Son to walk from the bus stop to home (three houses) or to cross the streets. Our children and other children on our street can not be in their front yards without supervision. Let alone ever ride their bikes on the street or cross the streets alone. We moved to Edina two years ago from Minneapolis for the schools and for the safety that Edina might offer for our children. We would not enjoy having to move again -so soon but, the traffic is an issue that we need to resolve. Thank you for your time. What ever you can do to help in this situation would be appreciated greatly. Regards, Jeff Spizale 952 - 929 -4160 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Sullivan, Michael P. [ mailto :Michael.Sullivan @gpmlaw.com] Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 7:39 AM To: swkelley @mmm.com; maryk @northerntool.com; aspizale @preferredspeakers.com; jells @excelfixtures.com Cc: rbsullivan @riderlaw.com Subject: FW: Temporary Stop Sign at West 56th St. at Woodland Circle See below - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Boyd Tate [mailto:btate @ci.edina.mn.us] Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 9:42 AM To: Sullivan, Michael P. Subject: RE: Temporary Stop Sign at West 56th St. at Woodland Circle 2/7/2005 Message Dear Mr. Sullivan: Page 2 of 3 Thank you for your e-mail voicing your concerns about the STOP signs on West 56th Street at Woodland Circle (west). I will be giving it to the Traffic Safety Advisory Committee at our meeting this morning. This committee will make a recommendation to the City Council of February 15, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. They can recommend that the signs be taken down, left as is, or continue on for further study. Remember, the committee can only make a recommendation. The Edina City Council has the actual say. The city has conducted additional tests at this intersection. On three different days, during three different time periods, car counts, speed studies and sign compliance studies were made. Normally speed studies and car counts are done by laying down hose tubes for a seven day period. However, these tests can not be done during the winter months because of snow plowing. During the winter months my job is to go out and visually collect the data. Speeds were not found to be excessive. Traffic count has not increased significantly since the last study was done in 2001. Compliance of the STOP signs, east bound and west bound was found to be the same as that of any residential stop signs. In one study, 75 vehicles passed through the intersection. 67 complied with the stop signs, 8 did not. Testing on the other two days were about the same. Speeds ranged from a high of 34 to a low of 18 mph. This is normal for residential areas similar to this. The City has received one request for the signs to be taken down. This request was in writing and came from a resident at that intersection. The reasons given are: "Increased noise due to traffic breaking hard and then rapidly accelerating. The signs have not slowed the traffic on 56th Street. The addition of the stop sign has had the effect of changing a pastoral neighborhood to the sounds of a busy thoroughfare. I have observed many violations, from rolling through to grossly ignoring the signs. We have observed violations approximating 50% or more of the time. Our view is safety on the street has been diminished as a result of adding the new stop signs." Since the letter went out I have received 4 phone calls and 4 e -mails all requesting that the signs be left in place. I could not find any data on other stop signs being removed in the City. All of the above will be presented to the committee which consists of: Chief of Police, Traffic Safety Sergeant, Public Works Supervisor, City Planner, City Traffic Engineer, City Engineer, and the Traffic Safety Coordinator. I hope this answers your questions. I will inform you of the committee's recommendation and your options should you disagree with their recommendation within the next few days. Respectfully, Boyd Tate Traffic Safety Coordinator City of Edina 2/7/2005 Message 2/7/2005 Page 3 of 3' - - - -- Original Message - - - -- From: Sullivan, Michael P. [ mailto :Michael.Sullivan @gpm[aw.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 5:34 PM To: Boyd Tate Cc: rbsullivan @riderlaw.com Subject: Temporary Stop Sign at West 56th St. at Woodland Circle Dear Mr. Tate: I received your letter dated January 26, 2005, regarding the temporary stop signs on West 56th Street at Woodland Circle (west). Frankly, your letter surprised me as the stop sign has been a great addition to our neighborhood. To help me gain a better understanding of the issue, at your earliest convenience, could you please provide me answers to the following questions: • Since installation of the stop sign, has the city conducted any further tests to determine the sign's effectiveness? • If the city has conducted additional tests, when were the tests conducted and what were the results of those tests (i.e. average speed, cars per day, etc.)? • How many "requests" has the city received to remove the temporary stop signs? • How many of the requests were made in writing? • How many of the requests came from people living on West 56th Street? • What were the "negative impacts" that people cited? In 2004, how many stop signs did the city remove due to negative impacts and ineffectiveness? Furthermore, if you or anyone on the Traffic Advisory Safety Committee would like my perspective on the stop sign prior to making a recommendation to the City Council, I would welcome a phone call. I live right in front of the signs, so my perspective would probably be helpful. Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. Best regards, Michael P. Sullivan, Jr. 81 Woodland Circle Edina, MN 55424 Work Phone: 612 -632 -3350 Fax: 612 - 632 -4350 E -mail: michael.sullivan @gpmlaw.com Boyd Tate To: Sjw9876 @aol.com Subject: RE: Stop sign on W. 56th St. Susan & Tom 0 V Loa G - 0 —1's �C . Page 1 of 1 Thank you for your concerns on this subject. I will be reading your letter to the Traffic Safety Advisory Committee when we meet on February 3, 2005. 1 will call or mail you with their decision. There are basically three things the committee can do with this. Recommend to the City Council that the signs be removed. Recommend that they be left in place. Recommend that this be referred for a continuing study. Remember, the City Council has the ultimate say on these issues. I will be in touch. Boyd Tate Traffic Safety Coordinator - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Sjw9876 @aol.com [mailto:Sjw9876 @ aol.com] Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005 3:53 PM To: Boyd Tate Subject: Stop sign on W. 56th St. Dear Boyd, As a homeowner at 51 Woodland Circle we want to loudly protest the idea of removing the stop sign on 56th St. Our home is essentiallly at 56th and France although our adress is on Woodland Circle and the speed of the cars turning off France onto 56th is dangerous. We have had numerous accidents at this corner. Backing out of our diveway can be dangerous as those who have turned off France accelerate down 56th. Anything that can be done to reduce the speed and eliminate the idea that 56th is just a freeway available to help people reach Wooddale faster is something we are in favor of. There are three children in our family and you have children of all ages in this neighbrhood. Yes, the stop sign is an inconvenience for some. It actually makes them slow their car down so that we can all exist safely in this neighborhood. Sincerely, Susan J. Wheeler W. Thomas Goodnow 51 Woodland Circle Edina, MN 55424 Ph : 952 285 -2846 Cell: 612 816 -8001 2/1/2005 Temporary Stop Sign at West 56th St. at Woodland Circle Page 1 of 1 Boyd Tate From: Sullivan, Michael P. [Michael.Sullivan @gpmlaw.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 5:34 PM To: Boyd Tate Cc:. rbsullivan @riderlaw.com Subject: Temporary Stop Sign at West 56th St. at Woodland Circle Dear Mr. Tate: I received your letter dated January 26, 2005, regarding the temporary stop signs on West 56th Street at Woodland Circle (west). Frankly, your letter surprised me as the stop sign has been a great addition to our neighborhood. To help me gain a better understanding of the issue, at your earliest convenience, could you please provide me answers to the following questions: • Since installation of the stop sign, has the city conducted any further tests to determine the sign's effectiveness? • If the city has conducted additional tests, when were the tests conducted and what were the results of those tests (i.e. average speed, cars per day, etc.)? • How many "requests" has the city received to remove the temporary stop signs? • How many of the requests were made in writing? • How many of the requests came from people living on West 56th Street? • What were the "negative impacts" that people cited? • In 2004, how many stop signs did the city remove due to negative impacts and ineffectiveness? Furthermore, if you or anyone on the Traffic Advisory Safety Committee would like my perspective on the stop sign prior to making a recommendation to the City Council, I would welcome a phone call. I live right in front of the signs, so my perspective would probably be helpful. Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. Best regards, Michael P. Sullivan, Jr. 81 Woodland Circle Edina, MN 55424 Work Phone: 612 - 632 -3350 Fax: 612- 632 -4350 E -mail: michael.sullivan @gpmlaw.com 2/3/2005 P* b VA 7-S AC OA � S � 5,0 Page 1 of 1 Boyd Tate From: Mary Everett [meverett @earthlink.net] IS�� I I `, 36 Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 11:04 AM To: Boyd Tate Subject: The stop sign on 56th street pot, Boyd, Thanks for our conversation, it was nice to meet you on the phone. I just want to summarize my suggestions: 1. 1 think that the gentleman at 80 Woodland Circle has a couple reasons to remove the sign but I think the reasons to keep it are far greater than to remove. 2. By the response you've already received you can see that many are more in favor of the sign than against it. 3. This couple ALREADY has a stop sign in front of their house (Woodland Circle). If they only want 1 sign, then remove Woodland Circle and keep 56th Street. 4. If the cars seem to speed up radidly when leaving the sign on 56th, possibly add one or two more signs between Woodland Circle and Brookside. The cars would not be able to go as fast if they had to stop sooner again. 5. When entering 56th street, turning left from Woodland Road and heading East on 56th, the visibility is VERY poor due to the incline of the street and landscaping. It would make more sense for the cars on 56th to stop so the cars on Woodland Circle can see them when turning. The cars heading west on 56th have a clear view of Woodland Circle in both directions when they are stopped. The cars on Woodland Circle do NOT have a clear view of traffic on 56th (to the east) when stopped. 6. Also, please consider that almost every house on 56th street has a driveway that enters 56th even if there address is that of the side street. It is far more difficult to back out with traffic coming so quickly with little stopping. 7. Consider the number of children on the street. I'd be happy to give you that if it is helpful. The children are heavily located between Park Place and wooddale as well as close to France Ave. I appreciate your attention to this and will hope the sign is not removed. As I said, I am sure that many of the recent stop signs that have been added to streets in Edina were also put in against the recommendation of the Engineering dept. I also am sure if I look into it that few, if any, stop signs have been put in as temporary, much less removed. Mary Everett meverett @Learthlink.net Why Wait? Move to EarthLink. 2/1/2005 Boyd Tate From: swkelley @mmm.com Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 8:43 PM To: Boyd Tate Subject: Temporary Stop Signs on West 56th Street at Woodland Circle it L. a- soya: / a� I received you letter regarding the subject. I am extremely concerned that the Traffic Safety Advisory Committee would even consider removing these stops signs. Our house is on the corner of 56th Street and Woodland Circle East. The volume and speed of traffic on 56th street was completely unacceptable prior to the insertion of the stop signs in question. While they have not completely,alleviated the traffic problem, the stop signs have definitely have helped reduce the speed of the vehicles traveling past our house. Myself and other residents on 56th street fought hard for these stops signs. The agreement reached on August\'17th was that another traffic study would be conducted and compared to the baseline to gage the impact of the stop signs. Consideration should be given to the fact that the baseline data is incorrectly skewed as the study was conducted in late June or early July when school was not in session, resulting in seasonally lighter traffic. Please suggest,alternative traffic calming strategies before even considering removal of these stop signs! And these suggestions should be near term (do not recommend sidewalks as this has no effect on the volume or speed of traffic on 56th Street). The City of Edina is responsible for ensuring the safety of residents of 56th street. With the traffic situation prior to the installation of>the stop signs, this was not a safe environment due to the speed and volume of traffic!!!! Scott Kelley 96 Woodland Circle Edina, MN 55424 d Boyd Tate To: swkelley @mmm.com Mr. Kelley, Thank you for your e-mail concerning the Stop signs on West 56th Street and Woodland Circle(west). I will present your letter to the Traffic Safety Advisory Committee at our meeting of February 3, 2005. 1 will advise you of the decision that is made and we can also discuss your options if you are in disagreement. The Committee only recommends... The City Council has the final decision. Boyd Tate Traffic Safety Coordinator To: Mayor & City Council From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: February 15, 2005 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item V.E. Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA To Council Subject: Big Bowl Asian LLC Intoxicating Liquor Action ® Motion Licenses ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Motion approving On -Sale Intoxicating and Special Sunday Sale Liquor Licenses to Big Bowl Asian LLC d.b.a. Big Bowl Restaurant, 3669 Galleria, for the period beginning February 28, 2005 and ending March 31, 2006. ° Info /Background: Edina Code Section 900 states that a change in corporate ownership of more than ten percent requires a new license application. At the end of February more than ten percent of the ownership of Big Bowl has changed. Lettuce Entertain,, Inc. still wholly owns the entity, but the restaurant located in Edina has changed ownership from Big Bowl, Inc. to Big Bowl Asian LLC. Big Bowl Asian LLC has filed the necessary paperwork and paid the applicable fees for a license. ' The' Big Bowl restaurant operation will remain the same. Additionally, since this change occurred so close to our renewal of liquor licenses we are asking Council to issue the licenses for a thirteen month period to avoid the burden of re- filing papers in just two more weeks. The Planning Depart_ ment has reviewed the application and finds that it complies with code requirements. The Health Department is satisfied with the applicants' plan for storage and service. The Police Department has completed their investigation and with no negative findings. Attached is Sgt. Stroh's memo stating the findings of the background investigation. The licenses are placed on the agenda for consideration by the Council. MONBACKGROUND INVESTIGATION SUMMARY ON -SALE INTOXICATING LIQUOR OR ON -SALE WINE LICENSE Establishment:' Big Bowl Asian LLC License: On -Sale Intoxicating & On Sale "Special Sunday Sales" On January 18, 2005, Big Bowl Asian LLC made application to the City of Edina for an On -Sale Intoxicating & On Sale "Special Sunday Sales" license. The required alcohol awareness training was completed on January 10, 2005. Big Bowl Asian LLC is incorporated in the State of Minnesota. The Minnesota Secretary of State reports they are in good standing. Mana2ers/Members of Big Bowl Asian LLC are: Kevin J. Brown Kenilworth, IL Richard A. Melman Winnetka, IL Daniel M. McGowan Libertyville, IL Jay. L. Stieber Prospect Heights, IL Members owning 10% or egr ater: Kevin J. Brown 32.5% Richard A. Melman 27.5% Daniel M. McGowan 15.0% The managers have been investigated and were found'to have no criminal records. Checks were made with the following agencies. „ NCIC MINCIS Hennepin County Minnesota Secretary of State Minnesota Liquor Control Board Personal, business and bank references were contacted and responded positively. From the information gathered during the course of the investigation, I found nothing to prevent Big Bowl Asian LLC from obtaining an On -Sale Intoxicating & On Sale "Special Sunday Sales" license. I would support a positive recommendation from the Police Department in regard to the issuance of this license: Sgt. Steve Stroh #134 e 1j CITY OF EDINA R56CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 213/2005 - 2/312005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 268699 213/2005 110728 10,000 LAKES CHAPTER 110.00 2005 DUES 105103 012505 1495.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 110.00 268700 2/3/2005 100608 3M CO NOF0878 318.65 SIGN LETTERING 105104 SS26499 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS 318.65 268701 2138006 100613 AAA 19.00 TAB RENEWALS 105105 012605 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS 19.00 268702 2138005 102234 ABDELLA, PAUL 256.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 105246 012705 6110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 256.00 268703 2=2005 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 35.40 105016 449790 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 21.56 105017 448803 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 36.12 105018 448773 5822.6515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 26.84 105198 449812 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 37.96 105199 449813 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 144.36 105369 450410 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 302.24 268704 2138006 100617 ADAMS PEST CONTROL 95.73 PEST CONTROL 105403 193378 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 95.73 268705 2138005 106162 ADT SECURITY SERVICES 25.02 ALARM SERVICE 105106 87526161 5111.6250 ALARM SERVICE 25.02 268706 213/2006 102715 ALLEGRA PRINT & IMAGING 63.90 JAN/FEB CALENDARS 105266 55000 5610.6575 PRINTING 63.90 268707 2138005 100630 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC. 844.67 COPIER PAPER 105404 156959001 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 844.67 268708 2138006 101874 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2/212005 9:17:38 Pape - 1 Business Unit INSPECTIONS STREET NAME SIGNS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING GRILL ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT ED ADMINISTRATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL LAUNDRY ART WORK SOLD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CHEMICALS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART WORK SOLD REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 212!2005 9:17:38 Page 2 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY COUNCIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE ART CENTER REVENUES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION EDINBOROUGH PARK CITY HALL GENERAL PSTF OCCUPANCY BUILDING MAINTENANCE ART CENTER REVENUES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 60.71 CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 268710. 21312006 104058 ANDERSON, RONALD Council Check Register 65.76 UNIFORM PURCHASE 2/3/2005 - 2/312005 012405 Check # Date Amount Vendor! Explanation PO # Doe No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 688.54 RADIO, ANTENNA KIT 105107 39975 1553.6237 RADIO SERVICE 167.74 ' ANTENNA KITS 105108 40052 1553.6237 RADIO SERVICE 856.28 11.70 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 105338 268709 2138005 100750 .ANDERSON, ERIC 11.70 6071 REIMBURSE FOR COFFEE 105402 013105 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE LAUNDRY ART WORK SOLD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CHEMICALS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART WORK SOLD REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 212!2005 9:17:38 Page 2 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY COUNCIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE ART CENTER REVENUES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION EDINBOROUGH PARK CITY HALL GENERAL PSTF OCCUPANCY BUILDING MAINTENANCE ART CENTER REVENUES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 60.71 268710. 21312006 104058 ANDERSON, RONALD 65.76 UNIFORM PURCHASE 105109 012405 1301.6201 65.76 268711 21=005 105961 ANDRES, JOANNE 11.70 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 105338 011105 5101.4413 11.70 268712 21312006 117701 APPLEBEES 28.00 GIFT CERTIFICATE 105405 013105 4077.6103 28.00 268713 2/3/2005 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. 149.26 DE, ACID; CHLORINE 105267 26277 5620.6545 149.26 268714 2/3/2006 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVC8 2.31.79 COFFEE 105082 6013-445826 1551.6406 67.95 COFFEE 105268 6013-446279 7411.6406 299.74 268716 21=005 114475 ARMOR SECURITY INC. 254.45 INSTALL MONITOR, SERVICE 105110 88072 1646.6103 254.45 268716 2/3/2006 117694 ARONSON, ROBIN 58.50 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 105338 011105 5101.4413 58.50 268717 2/312006 100634 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. 67.57 CLIPS 105111 1029361 1553.6530 7.88- CREDIT 105112 1035791 1553.6530 59.69 . t � a LAUNDRY ART WORK SOLD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CHEMICALS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART WORK SOLD REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 212!2005 9:17:38 Page 2 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY COUNCIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE ART CENTER REVENUES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION EDINBOROUGH PARK CITY HALL GENERAL PSTF OCCUPANCY BUILDING MAINTENANCE ART CENTER REVENUES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN l ~ T 105019 39496300 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 133.84 105020 R55CKREG LOG20000 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING CITY OF EDINA 105021 32120900 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 368.45 Council Check Reglater 32120800 6862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 133.95 105023 2/3/2005 - 213/2005 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX Check 0 Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO 0 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 268718 2/3/2006 5822.5513 104091 ASSOCIATION OF TRAINING OFFICE 50TH ST SELLING 40.50 105026 39498000 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 175.00 AGENCY MEMBERSHIP 105269 011505 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 50TH ST SELLING 388.30 175.00 32046700 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5300- 268719 2/3/2006 5822.5513 100256 AT&T WIRELESS 50TH ST SELLING 23.07 105113 011705 5420.6188 TELEPHONE 23.07 268720 2/3/2008 102615 BADGER METER INC 745.50 SOFTWARE SERVICE AGREEMENT 105114 743612 5916.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 745.50 268721 213/2005 103937 BAKER, ELIZABETH 120.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 105247 012705 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 120.00 268722 21312005 102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC. 173.45 BATTERIES 105115 22667 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 173.45 268723 213/2005 102709 BDS LAUNDRY SYSTEMS 434.56 WASHER REPAIR 105270 493458 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS 434.56 268724 21312005 101366 BELLBOY CORPORATION 2/2/2005 9:17:38 Page- 3 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CLUB HOUSE METER READING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 26.00 105019 39496300 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 133.84 105020 39496200 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 213.00 105021 32120900 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 368.45 105022 32120800 6862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 133.95 105023 39496100 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,602.90 105024 32120700 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,348.95 105025 32120500 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 40.50 105026 39498000 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 148.95 105027 32048600 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 388.30 105028 32046700 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5300- 105029 32075800 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5,247.84 268726 2/3/2005 117697 BENSON, NANCY 162.50 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 105340 011105 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 162.50 R55CKREG LOG20000 180.00 CITY OF EDINA 105248 012705 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION Council Check Register 180.00 2/3/2005 - 2/3/2005 Check 0 Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO 0 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 268726 2/3/2006 100646 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 105075 020305 70.18 NOTARY STAMPS 105116 SA0926 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 94.47 PENS, DISCS 105271 3618850 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 213/2006 146.51 WALL BOARD, MARKERS 105272 3608600 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 70.18 CUSTOM MADE STAMPS 105273 SA0966 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5101.4413 134.68 OFFICE SUPPLIES 105274 3595270 1470.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 95.90 CORRECTION TAPE, BOARD 105275 3592250 1552.8406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 7.68 DUSTER 105276 3610230 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 10.43 OFFICE SUPPLIES 105277 3618460 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRST AID SUPPLIES 3.07 OFFICE SUPPLIES 105278 3611900 5916.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 3.40 OFFICE SUPPLIES 105278 3611900 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 20.33 OFFICE SUPPLIES 105278 3611900 1100.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 118.43 OFFICE SUPPLIES 105279 SA9743 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 775.26 134.87 FILTERS 105118 709878 268727 2138005 REPAIR PARTS 100058 BFI 2.45 PINS 105119 33,874.00 RECYCLING 105280 70000708050100 5952.6183 RECYCLING CHARGES 56.06 33,874.00 105282 712099 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 268728 2/3/2005 105116 BJB ART STUDIO INC 2/212005 9:17:38 Page - 4 Business Unit CITY HALL GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING FINANCE METER READING PARK ADMIN. GENERAL CITY COUNCIL INSPECTIONS RECYCLING I .r 1 14 180.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 105248 012705 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 180.00 268729 2/3/2006 100711 BLOOD, DAVID 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 105075 020305 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 268730 213/2006 117698 BONNIWELL, PELAGRA 26.00 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 105344 011105 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 26.00 268731 2/3/2005 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 296.32 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 105281 50044462 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 296.32 268732 213/2006 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 62.32 ELEMENTS, FILTERS 105117 710129 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 134.87 FILTERS 105118 709878 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2.45 PINS 105119 707328 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 56.06 FILTERS 105282 712099 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 255.70 I .r 1 14 L � CITY OF EDINA 2/2/2005 9:17:38 R55CKREG LOG20000 Cound Chad Register Page - 5 ?/3/2005 -2=005 Check 0 Date Amount Vendor! Explanation PO 0 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 268733 213/2006 101489 BROOKS, DARLENE 200.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 105244 012705 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 663.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 105345 011105 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 863.00 268734 21312005 117695 BRUENING, CHARLOTTE 13.00 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 105342 011105 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 13.00 268735 21=005 117406 BUNKERT, DENISE 42.19 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 105341 011105 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 42.19 268736 2/3/2005 103244 BURTIS, ROBERT 150.00 PERFORMANCE 2112104 105406 010305 5610.6138 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 268737 202006 100776 BUTLER, GEORGE 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 105073 020305 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 268738 21=005 117693 BY THE WAY. - 45.50 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 105343 011105 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 45.50 268739 2/3/2005 102046 CAMPE, HARRIET 611.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 105249 012705 6110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 611.00 266740 2/3/2006 100679 CARLSON TRACTOR 6 EQUIPMENT 14.96 COVER 105120 C04661 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 14.98- CREDIT 105121 C04705 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 19.13 COVER 105122 508017 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 19.13 268741 2/3/2006 100681 CATCO 195.79 FITTINGS, CYLINDER 105123 3-65906 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 23.37 FITTING 105124 3-6364 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 153.84 PURGE VALVE KIT 105125 388547 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 25.03 FITTINGS 105126 3-8872 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 398.03 CITY OF EDINA 2@/2005 9:17:38 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 6 2/3/2005 — 213/2005 Check 4 Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO / Doc No Inv No Account No Subiedger Account Description Business Unit 268742 21312006 112661 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 12,171.16 105083 012005 1551.6186 HEAT CITY HALL GENERAL 9.72 105283 JAN21 7413.6582 FUEL OIL ' PSTF FIRE TOWER 12,180.88 268743 21=005 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 1,400.00 CABLE PRODUCTION 105084 30974 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 1,400.00 268744 213/2005 103040 CITY PAGES 434.00 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 105370 120804 5210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 434.00 268746 21=006 101227 COFFEE MILL INC. 348.00 BEVERAGES 105284 736478 5830.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES 348.00 268746 2/3/2005 104209 COLWELL, SUSAN 81.00 CLASS REFUND 105127 011905 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 81.00 268747 2/312006 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 269.69 CLAY 105128 INV000010175 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ' 458.49 CLAY 105128 INV000010175 .5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 728.18 268748 21=005 117052 CORNELIUS, TODD 810.00 MODEL FEES 105250 012705 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 810.00 268749 21=006 116766 CSI ERGONOMICS 317.38 KEYBOARD TRAY 105285 INVO15050 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 317.38 268760 213/2005 117387 DATARADIO CDR LTD 5,547.00 RADIO DUPLEXER MODIFICATIONS 105129 129547 03404.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS SCADA SANITARY SEWER 750.00 REINSTALL RADIO 105130 129557 04284.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS SCADA STORM SEWER 6,297.00 268761 213/2006 116927 DAVIS SUN TURF 150.44 REPLACEMENT TIRES 105288 554633 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 150.44 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 2/28005 9:17:38 Council Check Register Page - 7 2/3/2005 - 2/3/2005 Check 0 Data Amount Vendor / E)Vanstlon PO A Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Amount Description Business Unit 268752 2/3/2006 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING 268763 213/2006 114568 DEIRDRE & CO. 46.00 105030 297686 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,629.45 105031 297685 5862.6514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,021.16 105200 298535 6822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2 022 85 105201 298534 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE TELETYPE SERVICE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL TELETYPE SERVICE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PRINTING ED ADMINISTRATION CONFERENCES 6 SCHOOLS TRAINING PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 4,719.48 268763 213/2006 114568 DEIRDRE & CO. 32.50 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 105346 011105 5101.4413 32.50 268764 2/38006 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 41.60 SOCKET SET 105131 718401 1646.6556 41.60 268766 2138005 102712 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION 37.00 WAN - NOV 04 105371 DVO4110284 1400.6204 37.00 WAN - DEC 04 105372 DVO4120288 1400.6204 289.83 DEC 04 105373 W04120590 5420.6188 363.83 268768 2138005 101676 DESHLER, BRANDON 127.50 CELL PHONE CHARGES 105287 012805 1400.6188 127.50 268757 2138005 111120 DESIGN N PRINT 338.25 SEASON PASSES 105288 30499 5610.6575 338.25 268768 2138005 101986 DIBBLE, DON 22.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 105374 012405 1281.6104 22.50 268759 2412006 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 4,099.65 LEGAL 105375 1210193 1195.6131 4,099.85 268760 2138006 117435 DUNCAN, PAT _ 95.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 105251 012705 5110.6103 95.00 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE TELETYPE SERVICE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL TELETYPE SERVICE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PRINTING ED ADMINISTRATION CONFERENCES 6 SCHOOLS TRAINING PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 21212005, 9:17:38 Council Check Register Page - 8 2/3/2005 — 21312005 Check # Date Amount . Vendor / Explanation PO # Doe No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 268761 2/3/2005 100739 EAGLE WINE 134.50 105032 178955 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 299.65 105202 182062. 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,288.24. 105203 182059 5862.5513.. COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE VERNON SELLING 731.99 105204 182066 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE YORK SELLING 2.454.38 268762 21=005 100741 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE . 3,642.75 105205 324847 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,994.10 105420 324838 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5,636.85 268763 2/3/2005 116448 EGAN OIL COMPANY 12,964.78 GAS 105085 92449 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 12,964.78 268764 21=005 106768 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE 315.51 POWER SUPPLY 105132 BC0111105 -2 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION: GEN 315.51 268756 213/2005 105339 ENRGI 1,415.00 WEBSITE CONSULTING 105133 2360 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 1,415.00 268766 213/2006 117436 ERNST, MARCIA 100.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 105348 012705 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES . ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 100.00 268767 21=005 104004 ESSIG, CRAIG 228.26 FIRE ADMIN COURSE FEE 105376 012605 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 228.28 268768 213/2005 116030 EVANS, KARLA 44.33 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 105347 011105 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 44.33 268769 2/3/2005 100297 FAST FOTO & DIGITAL 11.73 PHOTO FINISHING 105289 T2- 198453 1470.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 11.73 268770 2/312006 106420 FIKES SERVICES 34.08 AIR DEODORIZERS 105290 559895 141.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS YORK OCCUPANCY CITY OF EDINA 2/2/2005 9:17:38 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Cheek Register Page - 9 213/2005 — 21d/2005 Check 0 Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO 0 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Untt 34.08 268771 213/2006 117021 FORD, LINDSAY 4.19 CRAFT SUPPLIES 105252 012705 5120.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 55.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 105252 012705 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 59.19 268772 2/3/2005 105699 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO. 8,828.16 2105 PREMIUM 105134 020105 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 8,828.16 . 268773 2/312006 106699 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO. 1,607.91 DENTAL PREMIUMS 2105 105291 66199 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,607.91 268774 2/3/2008 103337 FREEBORN COUNTY 700.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 105292 012805 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 700.00 268775 213/2005 103039 FREY, MICHAEL 1,240.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 105253 012705 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 2,060.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 105253 012705 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 3,300.00 268776 2/3/2008 101867 GETSINGER, DONNA 144.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 105254 012705 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 144.00 268777 2/3/2006 117413 GOLBERG, CAROLYN 74.75 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 105349 011005 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 74.75 268778 21=005 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC. 255.30 DEC 04 SERVICE 105377 4120305 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 255.30 268779 2/312008 104776 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICES 190.00 ANNUAL CONFERENCE 105408 013105 1120.6104 CONFERENCES 3 SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION 190.00 268780 2/3/2006 101103 GRAINGER 181.27 LADDER 105135 498- 271561 -9 5913.8406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 202005 9:17:38 Council Cheek Register Page - 10 2!3/2005 - 213/2005 Check # Date Amount - Vendor J Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 87.86 FUSES 105136 498- 549224-0 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 3.20 FUSES 105137 498 - 549223 -2 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY. HALL GENERAL 241.31 WORKBENCH 105293 973 - 431703 -6 5422.6556 TOOLS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 53.19 BALLAST 105294 496- 994050 -9 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 18.14 LIGHT BULBS 105407 495- 687565 -4 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 584.97 268781 2/3/2005 102670 GRAND PERE WINES INC 792.00 105208 00014995 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 792.00 268782 21312006 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 421.00 105033 70033 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE VERNON SELLING 379.75 105034 70003 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,026.25 105035 70082 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 89.25. 105207 70190 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,916.25 268783 21=005 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE 68.85 CELL PHONE CHARGES 105086 012405 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 68.85 268784 2/312005 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 31.96 CONDUIT 105138 906254557 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 238.73 LIGHTING 105139 906384398 1375.6530 REPAIR PARTS PARKING RAMP 42.93 ELECTRIC BOXES 105295 906447702 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 74.89 ELECTRIC BOXES 105295 906447702 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 398.97 LIGHT BULBS 105296 906543174 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINSOROUGH PARK 47.54- CREDIT 105409 903859314 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 739.94 268786 2/3/2005 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 390.59 105036 178957 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,079.51 105208 182064 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 74.65 105209 182065 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5,192.02 105210 182068 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 435.64 105211 182069 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,825.46 105421 182061 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 173.10- 105422 658290 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 9,824.77 268786 213/2005 117415 GUNN, PEGGY CITY OF EDINA 21=005 9:17:38 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Cheek Register Page - 11 2/3/2005 — 2/3/2005 Check 9 Date Amount Vendor / Eplanation PO A Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 59.15 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 105350 011005 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 59.15 268787 21312005. 114707 HAFEZ, ALLIE 29.24 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 105351 011005 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 29.24 268788 213/2005 106431 HALL, MARY - 150.00 PERFORMANCE 2110/04 105410 013105 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 268789 2/3/2005 116447 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON IN 233.25 CONSTRUCTION ADMIN 105378 13578 05430.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION WATERMAIN EXT - OXFORD 852ND 233.25 268780 2/3/2005 101387 HAPPY FACES 200.00 BEACH PARTY 2/12/04 106411 013105 6610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 200.00 268791 21=005 102301 HARTLAND FUEL PRODUCTS LLC 11,510.61 GAS 105297 639157 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 11,510.61 268792 213/2005 102190 HAYNES, PATRICIA 72.50 INSTRUCTOR AC 105352 012705 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 290.00 GALLERY PT 105352 012705 5120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 362.50 268793 2/3/2008 117691 HEALY, PATTY 285.00 CLASS REFUND 105140 012505 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 285.00 268794 2/3/2006 101871 HENNEPIN COUNTY FIRE CHIEFS AS 10.00 DEPT DUES 2005 105298 012605 1470.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 10.00 268795 2/3/2005 106371 HENNEPIN FACULTY ASSOCIATES 2,265.17 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES 105081 020305 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,265.17 268796 21=006 117696 HIGH VOLTAGE TESTING LABORATOR 456.60 ELECT. SAFETY EQUIPMENT 105299 1007483 1480.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SPECIAL OPERATIONS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 2/2!2005 9:17:38 Council Check Register Page - 12 2M2005 - 21=005 Check 0 Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO 0 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 456.80 268797 213/2005 100806 HIRSHFIELD'S 28.69 PAINT 105141 003958199 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE 28.69 268798 2/3/2005 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,213.00 105037 350370 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 212.00 105212 350371 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,425.00. 268799 2/312005 101385 HONEYWELL INC. 480.00 FOBS 105300 3145675 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 480.00 268800 21=005 101040 HOPKINS TOWN & COUNTRY DODGE 251.13 MIRROR PACKAGE 105142 112179 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN . 94.80- CREDIT 105143 112203. 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 156.53 268801 2=005 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS 63.59 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 105144 012405 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 87.38 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 105379 012605 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES 8 MAINTENANCE 150.97 _ 268802 2/3/2005 100842 HSBC 376.88 . RDR -GX7 105360 11040400107812 5125.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT MEDIA STUDIO 376.88 268803 213/2006 102384 HYDRANT SPECIALIST INC. 69.23 UPPER -ROD 105145 2705 1553.6530. REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN - 69.23 268804 2IN2005 117690 IMPRESSIONS ON HOLD INT'L OF M 1,321.00 ON -HOLD MESSAGING 105087 1415 2216.6103 .. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 1,321.00 268806 213/2006 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 135.23 PVC, PIPE, CEMEMT 105146 375081 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 56.71 POOL PLBG PARTS 105301 375759 5820.6530 REPAIR PARTS EDINBOROUGH PARK 191.84 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 2/3/2005 - 2/3/2005 Check 9 Date Amount Vendor/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 268806 2IY2005 116191 INSTY- PRINTS 25.87 COPIES 105302 68619 1120.6575 PRINTING 21212005 9:17:38 Page - 13 Business Unit ADMINISTRATION 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 5862.5512 25.67 VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 268807 2/3/2005 5822.5512 101400 JAMES, WILLIAM F 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 105079 020305 5822.5513 100.00 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 268808 2/3/2005 5882.5513 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE 727.36 5842.5513 105038 1845216 5822.5512 864,80 50TH ST SELLING 105039 1844508 50TH ST SELLING 810.69 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE 105040 1844496 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 78.15 5110.6564 105041 1844495 5110.6103 109.40 ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 105042 1844492 642.55 105043 1844493 32.15 105044 1844494 4.65- 105045 270831 43.90- 105046 271046 224.02- 105213 287728 752.81 105423 1847603 1,141.91 105424 1847604 3,315.45 105425 1847802 8,202.70 268809 213/2005 103664 JOHNSON, DENISE 224.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 105255 012705 224.00 268810 213/2006 102603 JONAS, LENORE 20.35 REIMBURSEMENT 105354 012705 280.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 105354 012705 300.35 268811 2/3/2005 108699 JOYCE, TERRI 26.98 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 105353 011105 26.98 268812 21312005 100839 KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES 87.63 BEARINGS 105147 K371477 67.63 268813 2/312005 1174117 KARCZ, BECKY 21212005 9:17:38 Page - 13 Business Unit ADMINISTRATION 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 6822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5882.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE VERNON SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE 50TH ST SELLING 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG . LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 2%3/2005 - 213/2005 Check 0 Data Amount Vendor / Explanation PO 8 Doe No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 23.40 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 105355 011005 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 23.40 268814 2/3/2005 111018 KEEPRS INC. 2/2/2005 9:17:38 Page - 14 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES 62.57 UNIFORM 105303 33204 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 384.65 UNIFORM 105304 32675 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 448.60 UNIFORM 105381 32111 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 33.95. UNIFORM 105382 32111 -01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 909.77 268816 213/2006 101340 KOCHENASH, RICK 578.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 105356 012705 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 578.00 268816 213/2005 100846 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO 1,860.00 105047 424854 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1.880.00 288817 213/2005 101936 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC. 436.00 BATTERY PACKS 105305 221333 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 436.00 268818 21=005 116260 LAW ENFORCEMENT TARGETS INC. 142.32 TARGETS TO SELL 105088 00548204N 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 142.32 268819 21312005 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 274.74 NUTS. BOLTS, SCREWS 105148 2820736 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 274.74 268820 213/2006 100853 LEEF SERVICES 31.59 SHOP TOWELS 105306 326645 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 31.59 268821 213/2006 101466 LIEBER, JUDY 250.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 105245 012705 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 254.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 105357 012705 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 504.00 268822 21312006 106301 LOFFLER COMPANIES INC. 56.00 COPIER USAGE 105307 106469 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 56.00 CITY OF EDINA 2/2/2005 9:17:38 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Pape - 15 21=005 —2=005 Check 0 Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO S Doe No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 268823 2/3/1005 100888 LOGIS 30.00 105383 24762 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 930.00 105383 24762 2210.6160 DATA PROCESSING COMMUNICATIONS 1,993.00 105383 24762 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING INSPECTIONS 2,056.50 105383 24762 1120.6160 DATA PROCESSING ADMINISTRATION 2,347.00 105383 24762 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,985.00 105383 24762 5910.6160 DATA PROCESSING GENERAL (BILLING) 4,673.00 105383 24762 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 4,861.50 105383 24762 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 19,878.00 268824 21312005 117023 LOUDER, MICHAEL 54.00 MODEL FEES 105256 012705 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 54.00 268825 213/2005 112677 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1,377.86 105214 173386 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 609.97 105426 173492 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,987.83 268826 21312005 116292 MAC TOOLS 7,881.00 TOOLBOXES 105149 24663 1553.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 7,881.00 268827 213/2006 106677 MAGC 10.00 MAGC FEBRUARY WORKSHOP 105412 013105 2210.6104 CONFERENCES 6 SCHOOLS COMMUNICATIONS 60.00 MAGC MEMBERSHIP 105412 013105 2210.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COMMUNICATIONS 70.00 268828 21=005 100888 MAMA 18.00 MAMA LUNCHEON 105089 1008 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION 50.00 MAMA DUES 105090 1054 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 68.00 268829 2/3/2005 102523 MAMA/GMC LABOR RELATIONS SUBSC 5,830.00 SUBSCRIBER SERVICE 105091 011705 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 5,630.00 268830 213/2005 100868 MARK VII SALES 1,848.30 105048 757176 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,540.40 105215 757408 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 213/2005 - 2/312005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanatlon PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 43.90 105216 757409 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 3.432.60 266831 21312005 100870 MATRX 21600 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 105308 678880 1476.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 5101.4413 1470.6215 1646.6556 1318.6406 5422.6406 5431.6406 5422.6530 1301.6406 5430.6406 1419.6102 1652.6511 1552.6511 1470.8552 1476.6552 1470.6552 977.6103 ART WORK SOLD EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES PROTECTIVE CLOTHING PROTECTIVE CLOTHING PROTECTIVE CLOTHING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 212/2005 9:17:38 Page - 16 Business Unit YORK SELLING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE SNOW & ICEREMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL MAINTENANCE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE RESERVE PROGRAM CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EDINAATHLETICAS' 'ION 216.00 268832 213/2006 117419 MCGLYNN, KELLY - 44.20 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 105358 011005 44.20 268833 21=05 100963 MEDTRONIC PHYSIO CONTROL CORP. 600.00 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 105309. PC578490 600.00 268834 21312005 101483 MENARDS 18.06 SCRAPER, TAPING KNIFE 105150 97113 95.53 MAILBOXES 105151 96727 48.33 TREE WRAP, FILE SET 105152 97175 15.66 TREE WRAP 105153 97363 236.50 FLUSH VALVE, MOUSE TRAPS 105310 96676 12.41 BLOWGUN, BLADES 105311 97095 . 62.65 STATUS, SOAP 105413 97961 489.14 268835 2/312006 100881 MERFELD, BURT 100.00 ,POLICE SERVICE 105074 020305 100.00 268836 2/3/2005 100882 MERIT SUPPLY 457.95 CONCRETE CLEANER 105154 66111 206.72 LOTION, CUPS, TOWELS 105155 86114 664.67 268837 2/3/2005 101390 MES INC. 845.78 GLOVES 105312 262012 392.75 BOOTS 105313 261690 103.92 BOOTS 105314 281688 1,342.45 268838 21312005 102607 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS 98.00 OFFICIATING FEES 105156 2695 5101.4413 1470.6215 1646.6556 1318.6406 5422.6406 5431.6406 5422.6530 1301.6406 5430.6406 1419.6102 1652.6511 1552.6511 1470.8552 1476.6552 1470.6552 977.6103 ART WORK SOLD EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES PROTECTIVE CLOTHING PROTECTIVE CLOTHING PROTECTIVE CLOTHING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 212/2005 9:17:38 Page - 16 Business Unit YORK SELLING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE SNOW & ICEREMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL MAINTENANCE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE RESERVE PROGRAM CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EDINAATHLETICAS' 'ION 2=005 9:17:38 Page. 17 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION ART CENTER REVENUES 4 TH QTR 2004 105401 011205 1550.6046 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 2,248.75 CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 2,249.75 268844 21311005 Council Check Register 21=005 - 21=005 105384 Cheek 5 Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO 5 Doc No Inv No Account No Subtedger Account Description 98.00 266846 2/312005 100912 MOTOROLA INC. 268839 21=005 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAI 3,358.18 MOTOROLA XTL 5000 105315 13421983 20.52 SHAFT 105157 438135FOW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 360.45 JOB PARTS 105158 438054FOW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 75.18 KIT 105159 438332FOW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 105161 012505 110.30 SEAL ASSEMBLIES 105160 436301FOW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 566.45 268847 2/312005 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 268840 21=008 100692 MIDWEST COCA -COLA EAGAN 65.00 CLASS REGISTRATION 105317 012705 425.30 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 105049 81264266 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 345.70 105050 80817147 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 104.20 105051 81254308 5622.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 875.20 268841 2/3/2005 111098 MINNEAPOLIS MEDIATION PROGRAM 5,000.00 2005 MEDIATION SERVICES 105092 EDINA05 1504.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5,000.00 268842 2/3/2008 117418 MINNESOTA SNO FLAKES 318.83 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 105359 011005 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 318.83 268843 2/3/2005 101144 MINNESOTA UC FUND 2=005 9:17:38 Page. 17 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION ART CENTER REVENUES 4 TH QTR 2004 105401 011205 1550.6046 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 2,248.75 2,249.75 268844 21311005 103974 MN WEIGHTS AND MEASURES 500.00 INSPECTION 5307918 105384 75074 -34359 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 500.00 266846 2/312005 100912 MOTOROLA INC. 3,358.18 MOTOROLA XTL 5000 105315 13421983 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 3,358.18 268846 2/3/2006 100092 MPSA 35.00 2005 MEMBERSHIP 105161 012505 1840.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 35.00 268847 2/312005 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 65.00 CLASS REGISTRATION 105317 012705 1640.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 65.00 POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 2/3/2005 101958 NICOL, JANET CITY OF EDINA 471.50 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR Council Check Register - 012705 5125.6103 471.50 2/312005 — 2/3/2005 Check 0 Date Amount Vendor/ Explanation PO S Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 268848 21312005 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. POLICE SERVICE 105078 020305 1419.6102 175.00 IRRIGATION COURSE 105316 012805 1640.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 268855 175.00 117102, NORTH AMERICAN SALT CO. 268849 2/312006 114343 MULLEN, JANET ICE CONTROL SALT 105162 11180771 1318.6525 27.50 INSTRUCTOR AC 105360 012705 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1318.6525 27.50 3,912.29. ICE CONTROL SALT 105164 11186680 268860 213/2005 101727 NELSON, BARBARA 268856 550.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 105257 012705 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 550.00 251.96 HIGHLIGHT, DISSOLVE 105165 87140 288851 2/3/2006 117422 NELSON, SUZANNE 268857 61.10 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 105361 011005 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 61.10 15.94 ART SUPPLIES 105166 30863701 268862 213/2005 104672 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 2/212005 9:17:38 Page - 18 Business Unit PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION MEDIA STUDIO ART CENTER REVENUES 17.61 105385 679000121026 1120.6188 TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION 66.23 105385 679000121026 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 268863 2/3/2005 101958 NICOL, JANET 471.50 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 105362 012705 5125.6103 471.50 288864 2138005 100724 NISSEN, DICK 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 105078 020305 1419.6102 100.00 268855 2/3/2005 117102, NORTH AMERICAN SALT CO. 10,461.27 ICE CONTROL SALT 105162 11180771 1318.6525 3,611.34 ICE CONTROL SALT 105163 11185483 1318.6525 3,912.29. ICE CONTROL SALT 105164 11186680 1318.6525 17,984.90 268856 2138006 102652 NORTHLAND CHEMICAL CORP. 251.96 HIGHLIGHT, DISSOLVE 105165 87140 1552.6511 251.96 268857 2138005 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY 15.94 ART SUPPLIES 105166 30863701 20.5510 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES SALT SALT SALT CLEANING SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD MEDIA STUDIO RESERVE PROGRAM SNOW & ICE REMOVAL SNOW & ICE REMOVAL SNOW & ICE REMOVAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING ART SUPPLY GIFT GA' 'SHOP R55CKREG LOG20000 Check 0 Data Amount Vendor / Explanation Council Check Register 49.34 ART SUPPLIES 17.37 ART SUPPLIES 82.65 268858 2/3/2005 100930 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO. 250.90 SCRAP TIRE DISPOSAL 250.90 268859 21=005 117423 OBRIEN, CHIAKI 34.19 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 34.19 268860 2/3/2006 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 78.60 GLOVES 267.65 SAW 82.01 GRINDER 426.46 268861 2138005 102611 P & R PRODUCTS CO. 1,432.08 HELMETS 1,432.08 268862 2138005 102440 PASS, GRACE 608.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 608.00 268863 2138005 115083 PATTINSON, WALT 70.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 70.00 268864 2138006 100347 PAUSTIS 3 SONS 651.80 99.75 38.00- 1,184.50 1,871.00 3,771.05 268865 2/38006 100946 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 152.60 340.50 216.40 PO 0 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 105167 30971800 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 105168 30863702 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 105318 NW -94078 1553.6583 TIRES S TUBES 105363 011005 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 105093 318471 1646.6408 GENERAL SUPPLIES 105169 319872 1646.6556 TOOLS 105386 313642 1553.6556 TOOLS 105319 E110447 105258 012705 1470.6552 5110.6103 105259 012705 5125.6103 105052 8058990 -IN 5862.5513 105053 8058991 -IN 6862.5514 105054 8059135 -CM 5842.6513 105217 8059549 4N 5842.5513 105427 80595484N 5822.5513 105218 72467759 6842.6515 105414 72510518 5421.5510 106415 73439845 5630.5510 2/212005 9:17:38 Page - 19 Business Unit ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER REVENUES BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 2/312005 - 2/3/2005 105319 E110447 105258 012705 1470.6552 5110.6103 105259 012705 5125.6103 105052 8058990 -IN 5862.5513 105053 8058991 -IN 6862.5514 105054 8059135 -CM 5842.6513 105217 8059549 4N 5842.5513 105427 80595484N 5822.5513 105218 72467759 6842.6515 105414 72510518 5421.5510 106415 73439845 5630.5510 2/212005 9:17:38 Page - 19 Business Unit ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER REVENUES BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES 105218 72467759 6842.6515 105414 72510518 5421.5510 106415 73439845 5630.5510 2/212005 9:17:38 Page - 19 Business Unit ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER REVENUES BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES 2/212005 9:17:38 Page - 19 Business Unit ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER REVENUES BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 2/3/2005 - 21=005 Check 9 Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO 9 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description - 709.50 268866 2/3/2006 100946 PERA 80,088.43 PPEND 1/25/2005 105320 012705 1000.2023 80,088.43 268867 21312006 106806 PERFORMANCE KENNELS INC. 193.01 BOARDING K -9 105321 1326 1438.6103 193.01 268868 2!3/2006 117702 PETERSON AIR SYSTEMS 170.41 HEATER MOTOR 105416 15477 5420.6530 170.41 268869 2/3/2008 100743 PHILLIPS MINE & SPIRITS 1,713.55 105055 2158222 5862.5513 979.55 105056. 2158687 5822.5513 187.85 105057 2158213 5822.5512 551.70 105058 2158216 5822.5513 267.85 105059 2158214 5822.5513 47.15 105060 2158215 5822.5515 896.55 105219 2158221 5862.5513 12.19- 105220 3311614 5862.5513 324.90 105428 2160505 5822.5513 1,355.75 105429 2160504 5822.5513 72.90 105430 2160503 5822.5513 95.31 105431 2160502 5822.5512 6,480.87 268870 213/2006 102166 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 225.37 105061 50069 5842.5515 24.03- 105082 50097 5842.5515 201.34 268871 2/3/2006 100966 PIPE SERVICES CORP . 6,970.00 SEWER TV INSPECTION 105170 2005007 5913.6103 6,970.00 268872 2/3/2005 100957 PLANT & FLANGED EQUIPMENT 1,331.14 TAPS 105171 00406674N 5911.6530 243.84- CREDIT 105387 0038122 -CM 5911.6406 1,087.30 P.E.R.A. PAYABLE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REPAIR PARTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 2/2/2005 9:17:38 Page - : 20 GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET K -9 UNIT CLUB HOUSE VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING DISTRIBUTION PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER CITY OF EDINA 21=005 9:17:38 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 21 2/38005 — 2138005 Check 0 Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO S Doc No Inv No Amount No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 268873 2138005 101110 POLLY NORMAN PHOTOGRAPHY 100.00 ABOUT TOWN PHOTOS 105094 012305 2210.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 100.00 268874 21=005 100961 POSTMASTER 150.00 PERMIT RENEWAL 105095 012405 2210A123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 150.00 268875 2/3/2005 100961 POSTMASTER 325.00 NEWSLETTER POSTAGE 105322 012705 1628.6235 POSTAGE SENIOR CITIZENS 325.00 268876 21=005 100964 PRECISION TURF & CHEMICAL 2,787.20 FUNGICIDE 105323 24113 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,787.20 268877 2138006 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 714.10 105063 178956 58225513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 867.80 105221 182063 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,516.68 105222 182060 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,622.37 105223 182067 58425513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 7,720.95 268878 2/3/2005 100969 PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING ENGINEE 2,159.50 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION 105388 03012.22 05413.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION WATER TREATMENT PLANT 92 2,159.50 268879 2138005 108322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 573.84 ICE MELT, ROLL TOWEL 105324 3486 5630.6408 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 573.84 268880 2138005 101877 PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY 3.48 COBRA 105325 012805 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 3.48 268881 2138005 104465 PUPPE, RICHARD 19.00 UPGRADE LICENSE 105172 012605 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 19.00 268882 2/3/2005 100970 QUALITY REFRIGERATION INC 195.00 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 105096 19140 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 2/2/2005 9:17:38 Council Check Register Page - 22 2/3/2005 - 2/3/2005 Check 0 Date 268884 21312006 268885 213/2005 268886 21312005 Amount Vendor / Explanation 195.00 100971 QUALITY WINE 1.60- 161.84 1.91 - 192.96 24.06 1,208.67 139.50- 295.95- 2.13- 214.96 4.33- 436.83 22.46 1,134.56 38.09- 1,922.25 6.52- 660.26 18.16 1,835.09 . 9.00- 909.70 7.41- 751.95 7.79- 794.00 5.93- 602.13 36.62- 1,845.06 12,048.78 101965 QVVEST 111.71 111.71 117692 R S S CLEANING INC. 447.30 RAMP STAIRWELL CLEANING 447.30 PO 0 Doc No Inv No Account No 105064 505376 -00 5820.5518 105064 50537600 5822.5513 105065 505427 -00 5820.5518 105065 505427 -00 5822.5513 105066 505555-00 5820.5518 105066 505555-00 5822.5512 105067 504963-00 5862.5513 105088 504484-00 5862.5512 105224 508055 -00 5820.5518 105224 508055-00 5822.5513 105225 508179-00 5820.5518 105225 50817940 5822.5513 105226 508341 -00 5820.5518 105226 508341 -00 5822.5512 105227 50836400 5840.5518 105227 508364-00 5842.5512 105228 508111 -00 5860.5518 105228 508111 -00 5862.5513 105229 507740 -00 5860.5518 105229 507740-00 5862.5513 105230 507214-00 5840.5518 105230 50721400 5842.5513 105231 508214-00 5840.5518 105231 50821400 5842.5513 105232 508442 -00 5840.5518 105232 508442 -00 5842.5513 105233 508110 -00 5840.5518 105233 508110.00 5842.5513 .105432 508340-00. 5860.5518 106432 508340.00 5882.5512 105097 81661/05 1550.6188 105173 1197 1375.6103 Subledger Account Description VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE . VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE. VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR TELEPHONE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Business Unit 50TH STREET GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING 50TH STREET GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING' 50TH STREET GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH STREET GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING SOTH STREET GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING 50TH STREET GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL YORK SELLING VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL VERNON SELLING VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL VERNON SELLING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL YORK SELLING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL YORK SELLING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL YORK SELLING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL YORK SELLING VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL VERNON SELLING CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PARKING RAMP CITY OF EDINA 2/212005 9:17:38 R55CKREG LOG20000 Cound Check Register Page - 23 2/3/2005 - 2/312005 Check S Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO S Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 266887 21312005 117424 REAGAN, SALLY 22.75 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 105364 011005 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 22.75 268888 21312005 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 218.50 REBUILT RPZ 105174 38362 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 218.50 268889 21312005 104602 ROAD MACHINERY & SUPPLIES CO. 963.07 PIERCING TOOL 105175 M96741A 5913.6408 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 963.07 268890 21312005 116393 ROGERS, RUSS 200.00 BEACH PARTY 2/12105 105417 010305 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 200.00 268891 21312005 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 105.44 CHANGEOUT PARTS WASHER 105176 MS01243278 1280.6271 HAZ. WASTE DISPOSAL SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 105.44 268892 21312005 101634 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPANY 77.22 BAKERY 105418 117207 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 77.22 268893 21=005 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 5.58 CHARGE 105389 LC041220 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5.58 268894 21312005 103859 SANDBERG, MARY 54.00 MODEL FEES .105260 012705 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 64.00 268895 21312005 108694 SCHWALM, ELISABETH 55.25 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 105365 011005 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 55.25 268896 2/5/22006 100349 SCOTT COUNTY SHERRIFF'S DEPART 365.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 105326 012605 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 365.00 268897 21312005 105550 SCRAP METAL PROCESSORS INC. R55CKREG LOG20000 HEX DRIVERS 37,741.28 CITY OF EDINA 1553.6556 92.31 268899 2/3/2005 Council Check Register 106002 SHOEMAKER, JAMI 268904 2138008 101002 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS INC 2/3/2005 - 2/3/2005 54.00 Check # Data Amount . Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 150.00 JAN. CHARGE 105177 D- COE5 -1 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 150.00 102871 SILVERS, ROXANNE 159404 5842.5515 268898 21312005 100995 SEH 54.00 MODEL FEES 105262 12,134.17 TOPO WORK 105390 0125153 01212.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 8,453.91 PRELIM DESIGN 105391 0125154 05436.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 8,453.91 PRELIM DESIGN 105391 0125154 04297.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 8,453.91 PRELIM DESIGN 105391 0125154 03413.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 245.38 PROJECT MANAGER 105392 0124786 10084.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 5125.6103. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 92.31 HEX DRIVERS 37,741.28 215311208134054 1553.6556 92.31 268899 2/3/2005 106002 SHOEMAKER, JAMI 268904 2138008 101002 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS INC 54.00 MODEL FEES 105261 012705 427083 5842.5514 54.00 105235 159401 268900 2/38005 102871 SILVERS, ROXANNE 159404 5842.5515 4,487.60 54.00 MODEL FEES 105262 012705 61.75 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 105366 011005 115.75 568.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 105263 268901 2138006_ 101000 SIR SPEEDY 58.58 BUSINESS CARDS 105327 46097 58.58 268902 2138005 101276 SJS CORP - CUSTOMIPSC SUPPLY 254.00 ICE MELT 105098 5307 270.94 ICE MELT 105328 5314 524.94 268903 2138006 103460 SNAP -ON TOOLS 5125.6103. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 92.31 HEX DRIVERS 105178 215311208134054 1553.6556 92.31 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 268904 2138008 101002 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS INC 360.00 105234 427083 5842.5514 634.92 105235 159401 5822.5514 13.55 105236 159404 5842.5515 4,487.60 105237 159405 5842.5514 5,496.07 268906 2138006 110977 SOW, ADAMA 568.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 105263 012705 '10.6103 TOOLS 2/212005 9:17:38 Page - 24 Business Unit CENT SVC PW BUILDING M &O VALLEY LN & VIEW - 66TH ST PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO WM PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO ST. PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO SS W 51ST & HALIFAX PED SIDEWALK MEDIA.STUDIO MEDIA STUDIO ART CENTER REVENUES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PATHS & HARD SURFACE PATHS & HARD SURFACE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINI' 'ION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Cheek Register 2/3/2005 - 2/38005 Cheek 6 Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO 0 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1160.00 CLEANING 105263 012705 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TOOLS CONSULTING DESIGN GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 2/2/2005 9:17:38 Page - 25 Business Unit ART CENTER BLDGIMAINT DISTRIBUTION SIDEWALK INTERLACHENBLAKE BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TIRES 6 TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION RADIO SERVICE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 1,728.00 268906 213/2006 101004 SPS COMPANIES 122.74 CUTTER, FLARE TOOLS 105179 S1168041.001 5913.6556 122.74 268907 21=005 101016 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 13,817.67 PROD NO.S-091 105393 5211 -2 07091.1705.20 13,817.67 268908 2/3/2006 100660 STANLEY SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC 21.85 CONTROL KEY 105160 MN- 359216 1648.6406 124.25 DEADLOCK, LOCKS 105181 MN- 359307 1648.6408 146.10 268909 2/312006 101015 STREICHERS 36.06 SQUAD EQUIPT INSTALLATION 105329 1242492 1400.6215 36.06 268910 21=006 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 32.08 CABLE ASSEMBLY 105162 375530CVW 1553.6530 124.40 SWITCH 105183 374687CVW 1553.6530 10.06 SWITCH ASSEMBLY 105184 374562CVW 1553.6530 166.54 268911 2/3/2005 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. 346.76 TIRES 105185 10032849 1553.6583 346.76 268912 213/2005 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 25.03 PUBLISH NOTICE 105186 751998 1120.6120 25.03 268913 2138006 110674 SUPERIOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIO 45.93 RADIO SERVICE 105330 8606 1553.6237 45.93 268914 21=005 100794 SWANSON, HAROLD 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 105077 020305 1419.6102 100.00 TOOLS CONSULTING DESIGN GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 2/2/2005 9:17:38 Page - 25 Business Unit ART CENTER BLDGIMAINT DISTRIBUTION SIDEWALK INTERLACHENBLAKE BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TIRES 6 TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION RADIO SERVICE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM CITY OF EDINA 2/2/2005 9:17:38 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 26 2/3/2005 - 213/2005 Check # Data Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 268915 213/2006 100169 TEJA8 1,199.19 MAYOR'S RECEPTION 105099 012005 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 1,199.19 268916 21312006 101326 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO 79.19. BULBS 105187 94312 -01 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 737.97 TERMINALS, CLAMPS 105188 95086 -00 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 817.16 268917 213/2006 101029 TESSMAN SEED CO. 182.12 RINK SHOVELS 105331 S055913 -IN 1648.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 182.12 268918 21=006 117042 THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT 65.00 SENIOR TRIP 105332 2096468 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS. 65.00 268919 213/2006 102742 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLAN 2,024.63 BRIDGE INSPECTIONS 105394 200500280 1260.6103, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 512.40 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION 105395 200500281 10026.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION LS-26 LIFT STATION 14 512.40 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION 105395 200500281 10027.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION LS-27 LIFT STATION 15 512.40 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION 105395 200500281 10028.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION LIFT STATION #5 512.42 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION 105395 200500281 10029.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION LIFT STATION #13 114.60 WATER LEAK LOCATING 105396 200500389 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 4,188.85 268920 2/312005 108695 TRESS, JASON 10.40 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 105367 011005 .5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 10.40 266921 213/2006 116411 TRINITY MEDICAL SOLUTIONS INC. 518.34 UNIFORMS 105333 4034 5630.6201 LAUNDRY CENTENNIAL LAKES 195.62 UNIFORMS 105334 4079 5630.6201 LAUNDRY CENTENNIAL LAKES 713.96 268922 2f=005 101053 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY 62.32 TRANSFORMER, CIRCUIT BREAKERS 105189 698121 1551.6408 GENERAL SUPPLIES. CITY HALL GENERAL 62.32 TRANSFORMER, CIRCUIT BREAKERS 105189 698121 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 688.45 RINK LIGHTING 105335 712820 1648.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE. 458.24- CREDIT 105397 625187 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 352.85 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 2/3/2005 — 2/3/2005 Check S Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO S Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 268923 21312006 100371 UNITED RENTALS 124.12 BOX BEAM LEVELS 105398 44767729-001 1301.8406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,729.55 VIB PLATE, SOCKET SET 105399 45332552 -001 1305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES ADVERTISING OTHER 21=005 9:17:38 Pape 27 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT STREET NAME SIGNS BRIDGES GUARD RAILS BRIDGES GUARD RAILS STREET REVOLVING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,853.67 268924 2412006 101073 UNITED RENTALS 836.74 CONES 105190 45705729-001 1325.6408 836.74 268925 213/2006 102819 UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC 499.49 NUTS. SCREWS 105191 05010462 1343.6406 33.39 DRAWER INSERT & SHELL 105192 05010344 1343.6406 532.88 268926 213/2005 116104 VERDICON INC. 685.60 ICE MELT 105193 S001912466.001 4090.6406 685.60 268927 2/312005 101610 VERIZON DIRECTORIES CORP. 90.75 DIRECTORY AD 105194 390009602998 5110.6122 90.75 268928 213/2006 102499 VIEWPOINT INTERNATIONAL 564.56 MERCHANDISE 105100 8179729 5440.5511 564.68 268929 213/2005 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 1,560.18 SAFETY VESTS 105195 151038 1301.6610 1,560.18 268930 21312005 101080 WALSH, WILLIAM 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 105076 020305 1419.6102 100.00 268931 213/2005 103266 WELSH COMPANIES LLC 593.65 FEB MAINTENANCE 105101 020105 5841.6103 593.65 268932 2/3/2006 102342 WENZEL, KENNETH 480.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 105264 012705 5110.6103 480.00 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES ADVERTISING OTHER 21=005 9:17:38 Pape 27 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT STREET NAME SIGNS BRIDGES GUARD RAILS BRIDGES GUARD RAILS STREET REVOLVING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CITY OF EDINA 2/2/2005 9:17:38 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 28 2/3/2005 - 2/38005 Check 0 Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO 0 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 268933 2138006 101077 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. 84.24 WIREBRUSH, GAUGE 105196 284116 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 67.27 HEADGEAR. SHIELDS 105197 285336 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 151.51 268934 2138008 101078 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT 2,460.00 UNDERGROUND TANK REMOVAL 105336 00273504N 5422.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,460.00 268935 2/3/2005 101033 VINE COMPANY, THE 358.40 105238 108553 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE YORK SELLING 612.05 105239 108548-00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 13.33- 105240 108075-00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE 50TH ST SELLING 957.12 268936 2/38006 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 734.16 105069 115201 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE VERNON SELLING 388.13 105070 115199 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE 50TH ST SELLING 389.88 105433 115756 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,492.15 268937 2138008 100591 VATT8TRUCK, MARTHA 240.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 105265 012705 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 240.00 268938 2158005 101086 WORLD CLASS WINE8 INC 513.00 105071 160270 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE 50TH ST SELLING 462.25 105072 160179 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 67.25 105241 160378 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,058.25 105242 160448 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,066.75 105243 160373 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE YORK SELLING 3,167.50 268939 2138005 101087 WROBLESKI, HENRY 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 105080 020305 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 268940 2138008 101726 XCEL ENERGY 54,07 105400 2357377472021 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENERAL 15,873.32 105419 0748247681026 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 15,927.39 R55CKREG L0020000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 213/2005 — 2/3/2005 Check t Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO i Doe No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Deaerwon 288041 21312006 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 247.83 FIRST AID CABINET 6 SUPPLIES 105102 54064075 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 55.29 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 105337 54084074 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 303.12 268942 21312005 101531 ZINN, BOBO 122.00 REIMBURSEMENT 105368 012705 6110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 312.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 105368 012705 5110.8103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 434.00 474,656.61 Grand Total Payment Inebument Totals Check Total 474,658.61 Total Payments 474,858.61 2/2/2005 9:17:36 Page= 28 Business Unit PSTF OCCUPANCY MAINT OF COURSE 6 GROUNDS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION R55CKSUM LOG20000 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 223,369.55 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 5,386.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 1,058.98 04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND 25,951.84 05100 ART CENTER FUND 18,312.92 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 434.00 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 7,892.12 05600 EDINBOROUGH/CENT LAKES FUND 3,511.75 05800 LIQUOR FUND 90,862.13 05900 UTILITTFUND 58,333.59 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 9,203.91 05950 RECYCLING FUND 33.874.00 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 467.82 Report Totals 474,856.61. We confirm to the best of Our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and City Manager 0 Aff R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Cound Check Reglster 2/10 /2005 — 2/10 /2005 Check i Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO 0 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 268943 2/10/2005 100715 ACCLAIM BENEFITS 457.60 FEE FOR SERVICE 105875 347668 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION 457.60 268944 211012005 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 219/2005 8:08:50 Page - 1 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 48.68 105707 449836 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 48.68 268945 2110/2005 106571 ADVANTAGE PAPER 67.61 FOAM CUPS 105669 416710 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 146.31 CUPS, NAPKINS 105670 416624 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 203.92 268946 211012006 114821 ALLEGIANCE TELECOM CO WORLDWID 535.45 PHONE/DATA 105628 14015160 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 535.45 268947 211012005 116917 AMCON 2,220.18 FEES 105876 21200 -03 7400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS PSTF BALANCE SHEET 2,220.18 268946 211012005 103285 AMEM 100.00 2005 DUES 105566 020205 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 100.00 268949 2110/2005 102171 ANDERSON -JOHNSON ASSOCIATES 2,466.50 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY 105567 041500105 47036.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT RENOVATE BRAEMAR PARK FIELD 409.50 ARCHITECT/ENG SERVICES 105568 050540105 47036.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT RENOVATE BRAEMAR PARK FIELD 2,876.00 268960 2/1012006 102470 AON RISK SERVICES INC. OF MN 9,437.00 PREMIUM 105627 6100000068504 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 9,437.00 268961 211012005 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. 317.04 FILTER BAGS 105784 26297 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 317.04 268962 211012006 100634 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. 54.80 BRACKETS, NUTS, BOLTS 105569 1036681 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 54.80 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 2110/2005 - 2110/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 268953 2/10/2005 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 101.55 WASTEIRECYCLING 105628 020105 7411.6182 101.55 268964 211012006 100638 BACHMAN'S COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 124.60 FLOWERS 105785 012005 5410.6406 124.60 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 268965 211012005 101366 BELLBOY CORPORATION 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 123.34. VERNON SELLING 105505 39525900 5842.5515 1,814.07 105630 105506 32173600 5842.5512 701.17 OFFICE SUPPLIES 105507 32173700 5862.5515 48.25 924.67 105508 32189500 5862.5515 32.32 105509 39526100 5862.5515 606.95 105510 32189300 5842.5513 37.10 710951 105708 39467700 5822.5515 65.00 105571 105709 32189200 5822.5513 32.32 FILTERS, GREASE. 105710 39525800 5822.5515 208.00 899.12 105711 32189100 5822.5512 489.00 105712 32190200 5862.5513 415.00 105713 32229200 5842.5512 4,572.52 268966 2/10/2005 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 750.00 SNOWMWN CARE 105629 8881 7411.6138 750.00 Subledger Account Description RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL SUPPLIES 2/9/2005 8:08:50 Page - 2 Business Unit PSTF OCCUPANCY GOLF ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING SNOW & LAWN CARE 268957 2/10/2005 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 556.95 TONER 105434 3613100 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 30.48 OFFICE SUPPLIES . 105570 3629210 7410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 169.08 OFFICE SUPPLIES 105570, 3629210 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 100.90 LABELS 105630 3604630 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 67.28 OFFICE SUPPLIES 105761 3632960 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 924.67 268968 2110/2005 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 89.12 FILTER ASSEMBLIES 105435 710951 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 522.27 KITS, SHOES 105571 712711 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 287.73 FILTERS, GREASE. 105572 712522 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 899.12 268969 2/10/2005 101366 BRENTS SIGNS AND DISPLAYS PSTF OCCUPANCY DISTRIBUTION PSTF ADMINISTRATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY OF EDINA 2/9/2005 8:08:50 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 3 2/10/2005 - 2/10/2005 Check 0 Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO 0 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 30.89 SIGN 105573 3246 5210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF DOME PROGRAM 30.89 268960 2110/2005 100681 CATCO 387.16 SHAFT, SEAL KIT 105436 3 -67009 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 557.31 COUPLERS, FITTINGS 105437 3.65683 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 60.59 MULTIFASTER KIT 105574 5 -13878 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 155.55 PURGE VALVE KITS, FITTINGS 105575 1 -25610 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 313.12 KITS 105576 3-67103 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 217.92 DRYER CARTRIDGES, COUPLERS 105577 3 -67086 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,691.65 268961 2110/2006 117717 CHUBB GROUP OF INS. CO. 981.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 105877 020105 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 981.00 266962 2/10/2005 105693 CITYSPRINT 14.33 COURIER 105631 10877 -1916 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 14.33 268963 2/10/2005 101395 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION 406.00 LAB TESTS 105878 T79PA000102971 01321.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA-321 VALLEY VIEW - WOODDALE 749.63 LAB TESTS 105878 T79PA000102971 01206.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 50TH - GRANGE TO WOODDALE M &O 1,076.25 LAB TESTS 105878 T79PA000102971 01206.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 50TH - GRANGE TO WOODDALE M &O 2,231.88 268964 211012006 104928 CONCRETE CUTTING & CORING INC. 863.75 GAS POWER SAWS 105632 50018 1480.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SPECIAL OPERATIONS 3,669.31 GAS POWER SAWS 105633 50017 1480.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SPECIAL OPERATIONS 4,533.06 268966 2/10/2005 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 37.31 RESPIRATORS 105438 02495246 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 4.41 SAFETY GLASSES 105439 02495833 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 7.23 SAFETY GLASSES 105439. 02495833 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 16.81 SAFETY GLASSES 105439 02495833 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 46.63 SAFETY GLASSES 105440 02493422 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 67.58 SAFETY GLASSES 105440 02493422 1846.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 67.65 SAFETY GLASSES 105440 02493422 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 120.53 SAFETY GLASSES 105440 02493422 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 239.45 SAFETY GLASSES 105440 02493422 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 16.27 GLOVES, RESPIRATIORS 105441 02494427 1301.6810 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE CITY OF EDINA 21912005 8:08:50 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 4 2/10/2005 - 2/10/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 197.28 GLOVES, RESPIRATIORS 105441 02494427 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 17.05 SAFETY GLASSES, EARMUFFS 105578 02496615 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 17.89 SAFETY GLASSES, EARMUFFS 105578 02496615 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 149.43 SAFETY GLASSES, EARMUFFS 105578 02496615 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 16.81- CREDIT 105672 02496015 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 7.23- CREDIT 105672 02496015 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 4.41- CREDIT 105672 02496015 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 977.07 268966 2/1012006 101704 COOK, BARBARA 269.89 AR & LE STAFF 105579. 5 -1160 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 269.89. 268967 2/10/2006 100513 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES IN 4,233.38 MONTHLY SERV /CARPET CLEANING 105580 93208 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 4,233.38 268968 211012006 101418 CUMMINS NPOWER LLC 521.96 GENERATOR SERVICE 105786 100.26474 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 521.96 268969 2110/2006 117387 DATARADIO CDR LTD 1,390.26 MINI CIRCUITS SW 201313 105581 129742 03404.1705.31. MATERIALS /SUPPLIES SCADA SANITARY SEWER 1,390.26 268970 211012006 103986 DAVE'S GREAT AD SHOP 250.00 . EDINA LIQUOR AD 105442 1889 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 250.00 268971 2/10/2006 110730 DAVID HARDWARE INC. 221.52 WINDOW FRAME 105443 8915 5912.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDINGS 221.52 268972 2/10/2005 100712 DAVEES WATER EQUIPMENT. 45.00 UNIFORM JACKETS 105787 3275465 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 161.91 UNIFORM JACKETS 105787 3275485 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 206.91 268973 2110/2005 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING 3,336.90 105714 299328 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 19,80 105715 299327 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,368.10 105716 299326 '822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING R65CKREG LOG20000 Check 0 Date Amount Vendor / Explanation GENERAL (BILLING) Council Check Register 288.00 Page - 5 ART WORK SOLD 2/10/2005 - 2/10/2005 2,773.05 109295 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 7,785.85 Business Unit 268974 2/10/2005 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 101667 DEHN, BRUCE 105829 299325 6862.5514 129.00 TRAINING 105444 012705 5919.6104 129.00 TRAINING 268976 2/10/2005 REPAIR PARTS 100717 DEKO FACTORY SERVICE 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 17.79 CORD 658418 5662.5513 17.79 VERNON SELLING 268976 211012006 5862.5513 111120 DESIGN N PRINT VERNON SELLING 105831 149.44 UTILITY RATE CARDS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 149.44 268977 2/10/2006 117722 DITTMAR, RUSSEL 78.00 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 78.00 268978 211012006 112663 DOLLARS & SENSE 990.00 COUPON ADVERTISING 990.00 COUPON ADVERTISING 990.00 COUPON ADVERTISING 2,970.00 268979 2/1012006 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES 2,922.54 CHEMICALS 2,922.54 268980 2/10/2008 104734 EAGLE TRAINING LLC 850.00 NEGOTIATIONS TRAINING 850.00 268981 211012005 100739 EAGLE WINE 513.97 570.75 6.91- 2,205.27 105762 CITY OF EDINA 5910.6406 2/9/2005 8:08:50 GENERAL (BILLING) Council Check Register 011005 Page - 5 ART WORK SOLD 2/10/2005 - 2/10/2005 105673 109295 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 105828 299781 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 105829 299325 6862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 105444 012705 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 105634 06971 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 105762 30571 5910.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL (BILLING) 105879 011005 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 105673 109295 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 105673 109295 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 105673 109295 5662.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 105582 82700094 -05 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 105763 05-02 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 105717 185399 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 105718 185417 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 105719 658418 5662.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 105830 165415 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 105831 659002 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING CITY OF EDINA 219/2005 8:08:50 RSSCKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 6 2110/2005 — 2/10/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 268982 2/1012005 100741 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 815.60 105720 324912 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER SOTH ST SELLING 3,890.60 105832 324928 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 4,706.20 268983 2170/2005 100742 ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION DMSI 117.15 PEST CONTROL 105788 4240140 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 117.15 268984 2/1012005 100649 ELECTRIC PUMP INC._ 511.25 PUMP SERVICE 105445 0027925 -IN 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS LIFT STATION MAINT 511.25 268986 211012006 117710 ELLIS MFG. CO. INC. 249.26 CLAMPS, JACK WRENCH 105635 16028 1480.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SPECIAL OPERATIONS 249.26 268986 2/10/2005 106194 EMA INC. 3,794.82 SCADA SYSTEM 105583 560490007773 04284.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN SCADA STORM SEWER 10,119.50 SCADA SYSTEM 105583 560490007773 05414.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN SCADA WATERMAIN 11,384.45 SCADA SYSTEM 105583 560490007773 03404.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN SCADA SANITARY SEWER 25,298.77 268987 2110/2006 106339 ENRGI 520.00 BRAEMAR WEBSITE 105446 2379 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 1,545.00 WEBSITE CONSULTING 105764. 2388 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 2,065.00 268988 211012006 100018 EXPERT T BILLING 5,520.00 JAN TRANSPORTS 105789 020205 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 192.00 ADDL JAN TRANSPORTS 105790 020305 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5,712.00 268989 2/10/2005 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 64.00 105833 275128 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 64.00 268990 2/1012006 102486 FAHRENKRUG, ROGER 480.00 GOLF INSTRUCTOR 105791 020505 5210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF DOME PROGRAM 480.00 268991 2110/200' 117703 FASCUT INDUSTRIES INC. CITY OF EDINA 2/9/2005 8:08:50 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page: 7 2/10/2005 - 2110/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,635.00 REBAR CUTTER 105447 3171 1480.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SPECIAL OPERATIONS 1,635.00 268992 2/10/2006 102387 FBINAA 120.00 2005 DUES 105584 020205 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 120.00 268993 2/10/2005 100766 FEDERAL EXPRESS 51.83 SHIPPINGIHANDLING 105585 7- 976 -75936 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 51.83 268994 2/10/2006 101432 FERRELLGAS 12.78 L.P. FUEL 105765 900145 5521.6581 GASOLINE ARENA ICE MAINT 12.78 268995 2110/2005 112704 FESLER, EDDI 195.85 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 105792 020405 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 195.85 268996 2/10/2005 101603 FLAHERYrS HAPPY TYME CO. 181.60 105721 18808 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 525.50 105880 18805 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 707.00 268997 2/10/2005 106192 FLAMING RIVER INDUSTRIES INC. 148.63 SWITCH & LOCK -OUT 105586 64463 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 148.63 266998 211012008 102016 FLOWERS OF EDINA 115.02 RECEPTION FLOWERS 105636 2514 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 115.02 268999 2/1012006 102727 FORCE AMERICA 39.49 COIL 105448 01220504 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 289.50 SANDER MOTORS 105587 01220717 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 328.99 269000 2/10/2005 116314 GALAXY TECHNICAL SERVICES 2,389.08 2005 PRINTER MAINTENANCE 105449 1621 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 8,572.20 2005 PRINTER MAINTENANCE 105449 1621 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 186.00 JET DIRECT CARD REPLACED 105881 1845 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 5.72- CREDIT 105882 1572 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF. EDINA Council Check Register 2/10/2005 - 2/10/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No . Account No Subledger Account Description 11,141.56 269001 211012005 116600 GILBARCO INC. 150.00 PC MANAGER SYSTEM 105588 02330361 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 2/9/2005 8:08:50 Page - 8 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 150.00 269002 211012006 104119 GILBERTSON, BRIAN 212.50 MIDWINTER BEACH PARTY 105674 020305 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 212.50 269003 2/10/2006 114510 GOODHUE COUNTY 300.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 105766 020305 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 300.00 269004 2110/2006 101176 GOPHER 266.02 BALLS, RAINBOW CONES 105793 7083117 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 266.02 269005 2110/2006 102646 GRAFFITI CONTROL SERVICES 470.00 GRAFFITI REMOVAL 105675 00001220 1646.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 470.00 269006 2/10/2006 101103 GRAINGER 355.86 HAND TOOLS 105450 495-017492 -4 5913.6556 TOOLS DISTRIBUTION -56.26 CAP SCREWS 105589 001 - 190565 -0 1343.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BRIDGES GUARD RAILS 243.08 ADJUSTABLE WRENCHS 105590 495 - 945127 -1 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 130.96 THERMOMETERS, CAP SCREWS 105591 495 - 1905647 1343.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BRIDGES GUARD RAILS 101.60 V -BELTS 105676 498- 280443 -9 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 13.42 BEAD PROBE 105677 498 - 280444 -7 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 242.22 PAINT, BRUSH, BROOM 105678 495- 371656 -2 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,916.04 WIRE LOCATOR 105679 939- 985928-0 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 3,059.44 269007 2110/2005 102670 GRAND PERE WINES INC 900.35 105722 00015050 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 900.35 269008 211012005 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 121.25 105511 70191 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING .1,022.06 105512 70249 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 254.50 105834 70376 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,397.75 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 2110/2005 -2/10/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 269009 211012005 106407 GRAY, CAROL 168.58 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 105883 012805 6101.4413 ART WORK SOLD GENERALSUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 2/9/2005 8:08:50 Page - 9 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES CENT SVC PW BUILDING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER LUBRICANTS REPAIR PARTS ED ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 168.58 269010 211012005 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 105.71 CONNECTORS, CONDUDIT 105592 906606900 1552.6406 105.71 269011 2/10/2006 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. .85 105513 183698 5862.5512 27.85 105723 185866 5822.5515 645.23 105724 185867 5822.5512 1,731.20 105725 185865 5862.5512 3,369.25 105726 184430 5862.5512 95.60 105727 185868 5842.5515 2,929.36 105728 185869 5842.5512 1,70 105729 184356 5842.5512 28.09 105730 185864 5862.5515 163.03- 105731 659040 5842.5512 67,29- 105732 658849 5862.5513 3,369.25 105835 184431 5842.5512 25.00- 105836 659056 5842.5512 11,943.06 269012 211012006 100786. GROTH MUSIC 118.75 SHEET MUSIC 105794 956943 5620.6406 118.75 269013 2/10/2006 102426 HALE, WILLIAM 150.00 PERFORMANCE 2/24/05 105680 020105 5610.6136 150.00 269014 211012005 106431 HALL, MARY 150.00 PERFORMANCE 2/22/05 105681 020105 6610.6136 150.00 269016 2/10/2005 100791 HALLMAN OIL COMPANY 182.84 WINDOW WASH FLUID 105451 143993 1553.6584 372.04 OIL 105682 144337 5422.6530 554.88 GENERALSUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 2/9/2005 8:08:50 Page - 9 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES CENT SVC PW BUILDING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER LUBRICANTS REPAIR PARTS ED ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CITY OF EDINA 2/9/2005 8:08:50 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 10 2/10/2005 — 2/1012005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 269016 211012005 103884 HANCO CORPORATION 447.94 CABLE KITS 105452 304746 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 447.94 269017 2110/2005 102209 HEALTH PARTNERS 624.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 105884 020405 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 624.00 269018 2110/2006 102070 HENNEPIN COUNTY CHIEFS OF POLI 300.00 2005 DUES 105593 020205 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 300.00 269019 2/10/2005 106436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION 1,479.89 RADIO ADMIN FEE 105767 25018010 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL . POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 178.30 RADIO_ ADMIN FEE 105795 25018068 1553.6237 RADIO SERVICE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,658.19 269020 211012006 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 1,501.69 DEC 2004 105885 000814 1195.6225 BOARD & ROOM PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES 1,501.69 269021 2/10/2005 101717 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 2,944.67 REWIRING REPAIRS 105796 W0RK00099 1330.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS TRAFFIC SIGNALS 74.11 SIGNAL MAINT 105886 SIGN00211 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3,018.78 269022 2110/2005 101281 HERSHEY, JERRY 124.95 UNIFORM PURCHASE 105453 012705 . 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 124.95 269023 2/10/2005 100806 HIRSHFIELD'S 52.89 VARNISH, STAIN, RAGS 105683 003958480 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 52.89 269024 2/1012006 102206 HOMBERGER, JEFF 221.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 105797 020405 5410.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 221.00 269025 2110/2006 102316 HOPKINS GARMENT LETTERING 108.84 CITY LOGOS ON UNIFORMS 105637 8943 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 108.84 CITY OF EDINA 21912005 8:08:50 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 11 2/10/2005 — 211012005 Check 0 Date Amount Vendor/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 269026 2110/2006 101040 HOPKINS TOWN & COUNTRY DODGE 261.50 REPAIRS 105594 44592 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 261.50 269027 211012006 100842 HSBC 145.88 PRINTER, CABLE 105638 01240504105557 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 145.88 269028 211012006 101426 HUGHES, GORDON 347.90 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 105595 020205 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION 347.90 269029 211012005 100811 HYDRO METERING TECHNOLOGY 571.91 METER, FLANGE SET 105798 0028831 -IN 5914.5516 COST OF GOODS SOLD METERS TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 571.91 269030 2/1012006 100698 IMAGETECH SERVICES CORP 316.82 CARTRIDGE, PRINTHEAD 105596 61707 1260.6548 BLUE PRINTING ENGINEERING GENERAL 316.82 269031 2110/2005 117709 INDEPENDENT MEDICAL SERVICES C 1,465.81 FEE FOR SERVICE 105639 14039 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 1,465.81 269032 211012005 106061 INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION EN 50.00 MEMBERSHIP FEE 105640 013105 1260.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ENGINEERING GENERAL 50.00 269033 211012005 116526 INTEGRATED FABRICATION LLC 550.00 BOARD CLEANING 105769 221 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 550.00 269034 211012005 103134 INTERLIGHT 143.92 LIGHTING 105641 6666680 5125.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 143.92 269036 2/10/2006 105198 INTERNATIONAL ASSOC. FOR PROPE 100.00 2005 MEMBERSHIP 105768 020305 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 100.00 269036 211012006 101612 JACK RICHESON & CO. INC. 93.58 ART SUPPLIES 105642 0290708 -IN 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor / E)Ianation 93.58 269037 211012005 100828. JERRY'S FOODS 12.40 18.16 21.88 29.33 50.60 118.98 251.35 269038 211012006 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 3.99 4.42 8.99 11.46 13.34 18.82 18.85 21.71 22.97 33.97 34.73 38.43 50.83 51.55 82.83 136.28 140.03 168.61 189.74 191.34 269039 2110/2006 102146 JESSEN PRESS 207.68 PUBLIC NOTICE SHELLS 207.68 269040 2/10/2005 100832 JIM HATCH SALES 368.44 SHOVELS 105887 CITY OF EDINA 1550.6406 2/9/2005 8:08:50 CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL Council Check Register 6614 Page - 12 TOOLS 2110/2005 - 2/10/2005 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 105770 013105 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 105770 013105 1470.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 105770 013105 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 105770 013105 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 105770 013105 5410.6406_ GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 105770 013105 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 105684 013105 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 105684 013105 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 105684 013105 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 105684 013105 1490.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC HEALTH 105684 013105 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH STREET GENERAL 105684 013105 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 105684 013105 5210.6406 .GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF DOME PROGRAM 105684 013105 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 105684 013105 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 105684 013105, 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET REVOLVING 105684 013105 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 105684 013105 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 105684 013105 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 105684 013105 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 105684 013105 5913.6406. GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 105684 013105 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 105684 013105 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 105684 013105 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 105684 013105 5620.8406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 105684 013105 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 105684 013105 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 105684 013105 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 105887 50662 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 105597 6614 301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENP R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 2/9/2005 8:08:50 Council Check Register Page - 13 2110/2005 - 2110/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 368.44 289042 211012006 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 2,377.59 105514 1847612 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE VERNON SELLING 60.30 105515 1847617 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 949.65 105518 1847608 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 807.84 105517 1847613 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,355.51 105518 1847616 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 563.60 105519 1847605 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,545.44 105520 1847611 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 123.95 105521 1847610 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,153.21 105522 1847606 5842.6513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 46.40 105523 1847614 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE VERNON SELLING 1,568.90 105524 1847607 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE YORK SELLING 2.39- 105525 270532 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 27.55- 105526 272316 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 35.15- 105527 272318 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 163.75- 105528 272317 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 20.19- 105529 272098 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4.88- 105530 271847 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 48,16- 105531 271846 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 21,55- 105532 271515 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 9.52- 105533 272099 6842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 31.49- 105534 272101 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4.13- 105535 272100 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,87- 105536 272097 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,855.80 105733 1847615 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,174.86 105837 1850990 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 780.55 105838 1850992 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,446,78 105839 1850989 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE YORK SELLING 1,263.15 105840 1850988 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,922.67 105841 1850991 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 719.76 105842 1850996 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 549.90 105843 1850993 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,805.05 105844 1850995 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,153.73 105845 1850987 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 109.45 105846 1850984 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 298.43 105847 1850986 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 604,25 105848 1850985 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,145.32 105849 1847609 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 40,005.46 5610.6136 05447.1705.21 1400.6104 5410.6107 5842.5514 5842.5515 5842.5514 5822.5515 5822.5514 5842.5515 5842.5514 4601.6103 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CONSULTING INSPECTION 2/9/2005 8:08:50 Page - 14 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION MEDIA STUDIO MEDIA STUDIO ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION MEDIA STUDIO ED ADMINISTRATION WM447 WELL #44701 SOUTHVIEW CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION COST.OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - POLICE FORFEITURE 357.93 CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 269044 2/10/2006 101846 JUST FRIENDS BIG BAND Council Check Register 100.00 PERFORMANCE 2/20/05 105671. 020105 2/1012005 - 2/10/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 269043 211012006 100919 JOHNSON, NAOMI 106186 KAEDING & ASSOCIATES INC. 10.21 PETTY CASH 105685 012705 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 10.21 PETTY CASH 105685. 012705 5125.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 27.67 PETTY CASH 105685 012705 5125.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 40.65 PETTY CASH 105685 012705 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 40.65 PETTY CASH 105685 012705 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 41.93 PETTY CASH 105685 012705 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 93.11 PETTY CASH 105685 012705 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 9350 PETTY CASH 105685 012705 5125.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5610.6136 05447.1705.21 1400.6104 5410.6107 5842.5514 5842.5515 5842.5514 5822.5515 5822.5514 5842.5515 5842.5514 4601.6103 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CONSULTING INSPECTION 2/9/2005 8:08:50 Page - 14 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION MEDIA STUDIO MEDIA STUDIO ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION MEDIA STUDIO ED ADMINISTRATION WM447 WELL #44701 SOUTHVIEW CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION COST.OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - POLICE FORFEITURE 357.93 269044 2/10/2006 101846 JUST FRIENDS BIG BAND 100.00 PERFORMANCE 2/20/05 105671. 020105 100.00 269045 2110/2006 106186 KAEDING & ASSOCIATES INC. 196.00 SUBMITTAL REVIEW 105799 490208D 196.00 269046 2110/2005 117723 KAPALA, ELISSA 1,500.00 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 105888 020205 1,500.00 269047 2/10/2006 104979 KOCON, ED 131.36 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 105800 020405 131.36 269048 2110/2006 100846 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO 1,038.45 105537 425452 53.00 105538 425446 2,611,20 105539 425593 63.00 105734 425449 725.80 105735 426448 36.00 105850 426102 1,221.25 105851 426101 5,748.70 269049 2/10/2005 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS 221.06 DWI TOWING 105598 020105 221.06 5610.6136 05447.1705.21 1400.6104 5410.6107 5842.5514 5842.5515 5842.5514 5822.5515 5822.5514 5842.5515 5842.5514 4601.6103 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CONSULTING INSPECTION 2/9/2005 8:08:50 Page - 14 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION MEDIA STUDIO MEDIA STUDIO ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION MEDIA STUDIO ED ADMINISTRATION WM447 WELL #44701 SOUTHVIEW CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION COST.OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - POLICE FORFEITURE 2/9/2005 8:08:50 Page - 15 Business Unit ADMINISTRATION DISTRIBUTION ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION EDINBOROUGH PARK GENERAL (BILLING) LIQUOR YORK GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING GENERAL CENT SERV GEN - MIS 50TH ST SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 211012005 - 211012005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 269060 211012006 100848 LABOR RELATIONS ASSOCIATES INC 84.00 FEE FOR SERVICE 105889 010105 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 84.00 269061 211012005 100849 LAKELAND ENGINEERING 477.65 SOLENOID VALVES 105454 12136214-01 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS 477.65 269062 2/10/2005 116132 LANGHOLZ, DAVID 100.00 REPAIR SOUND SYSTEM 105771 3308 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 100.00 269053 2/10/2005 101887 LEAGUE OF MINN HUMAN RIGHTS CO 246.75 LMHRC DUES 105772 010105 1504.6105 DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS 246.75 269054 211012005 117720 LIFE FITNESS 117.74 PULLEYS, CABLES 105801 F012500614 5620.6530 REPAIR PARTS 117.74 269066 2110/2005 100858 LOGIS 26,22 105890 24792/24823 5910.6160 DATA PROCESSING 156.74 105890 24792/24823 5840.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 254.44 105890 24792/24823 2210.6160 DATA PROCESSING 427.45 105890 24792124823 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,946.06 105890 24792124823 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING 2,810.91 269056 211012006 112677 M. AMUNDSON LLP 896.82 105852 173866 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 896.82 269067 2/1012006 100864 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. 40.30 ANNTENNA 105455 2051297 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 360.45 HANDLE ASSEMBLY 105456 2051308 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 400.75 269068 2110/2006 114699 MANAGED SERVICES INC. 120.35 SUPPLIES 105802 025556 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 136.32 ADDITIONAL CLEANING 105803 025633 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 420.68 FEB 2005 CLEANING 105804 606997 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 677.35 2/9/2005 8:08:50 Page - 15 Business Unit ADMINISTRATION DISTRIBUTION ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION EDINBOROUGH PARK GENERAL (BILLING) LIQUOR YORK GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING GENERAL CENT SERV GEN - MIS 50TH ST SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Data Amount Vendor / Explanation 269059 2/10/2005 EDINBOROUGH PARK 100868 MARK VII SALES 013105 2,744.30 TRIPS PROF SERVICES 2/10/2005 4,394.50 88985 5630.6406 3,284.95 Inv No Account No 24.80 Business Unit 105540 743.40 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 107.50 105541 759527 3,028.41 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 630.00 759431 5862.5514 14,957.86 VERNON SELLING 269060 2/10/2005 759528 103280 MARLIN COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 586.57 COMMUNICATIONS PROGRAM 759429 586.57 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 269061 . 2/10/2005 105737 101030 MATHISON CO. 5822.5514 29.98 PAINT 105853 185.51 PAINT COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 215.49 105854 269062 2/10/2006 5842.5514 100875 MCCAREN DESIGNS INC. YORK SELLING 763.61 PLANTS 763.61 269063 2/1012005 106603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 2,150.00 SENIOR TRIP 2,150.00 269064 21110/2006 101483 MENARDS 40.81 GOOF OFF, LUMBER 32.72 COUNTERTOP SUPPLIES 181.44 BRUSHES, SANDER, SANDPAPER 377.72 WOOD, FASTENERS 632.69' 269066 211012005 100882 MERIT SUPPLY 709.55 WYPALLS, SOAP, LINERS 399.59 FLOOR FINISHING SUPPLIES 292.52 BOWL CLEANER, WYPALLS 280.72 SNOW PUSHERS, SQUEEGEES 246.97 GRILL CLEANER, WINDEX 105457 309038 1281.6104 1 1 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 105643 590487-0 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 105643 590487-0 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 105805 CITY OF EDINA 5620.6620 2/9/2005 8:08:50 EDINBOROUGH PARK Council Check Register 013105 Page - 16 TRIPS PROF SERVICES 2/10/2005 - 2/10/2005 88985 5630.6406 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 105540 759425 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 105541 759527 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 105542 759431 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 105543 759528 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 105736 759429 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER .50TH ST SELLING 105737 759430 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 105853 761766 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 105854 761767 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 105457 309038 1281.6104 1 1 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 105643 590487-0 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 105643 590487-0 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 105805 30159 5620.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH PARK 105686 013105 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 105599 97846 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 105806 98506 5430.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 105891 88985 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 105892 85216 5630.6532 PAINT CENTENNIAL LAKES 105458 66184 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 105459 66185 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH STREET GENERAL 105600 66179 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 105687 66190 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 105807 66217 421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GRILL CITY OF EDINA 2/9/2005 8:08:50 R55CKREO LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 17 2/10/2005 — 2/10/2005 Check B Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,929.35 269066 2/10/2006 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 86.27 VESTS 105460 80604 4077.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 86.27 269067 2/10/2005 102607 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS 98.00 OFFICIATING FEES 105601 2705 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 98.00 269068 2/10/2006 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAI 43.93 DEFROST 105461 438402FOW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 43.93 269069 2/1012006 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY 814.94 CLEANING SUPPLIES 105644 020105 1551.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 814.94 269070 2110/2005 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 16.84 CARBON DIOXIDE 105808 R101050152 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 16.84 269071 211012005 100913 MINNEAPOLIS SUBURBAN SEWER & W 1,360.00 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 105462 32617 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1,190.00 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 105463 32619 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 2,380.00 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 105602 32621 6913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 2,720.00 TELEVISED SEWER SERVICE 105688 32618 03413.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO SS 7,650.00 269072 2110/2005 100902 MINNESOTA CONWAY 217.77 EXTINGUISHER BRACKETS 105464 340709 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 217.77 269073 211012006 102288 MINNESOTA COUNTIES INSURANCE T 250.00 2005 DUES 105648 003255 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 250.00 269074 2110/2006 100903 MINNESOTA ELEVATOR INC 96.09 FEB SERVICE 105809 67494 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 96.09 269076 211012005 101376 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT R55CKREG LOG20000 Business Unit REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION CITY OF EDINA DISTRIBUTION REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION REQUEST INSPECT CERT BKS Council Check Register 013105 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2110/2005 - 2110/2005 Check 0 Date Amount Vendor/ Explanation PO 0 Doe No Inv No Account No REQUEST INSPECT CERT BKS 144.18 REPAIR CLAMP 105604 0162069 5913.6530 5.00 205.18 CURB BOX EXT 105605 0161961 5913.6406 294.06 CURB BOX REPAIR PARTS 105606 0161990 5913.6530 GENERAL SUPPLIES, 643.42 50.00 MAINT FEE- JAN,FEB,MAR 105466 1/31/2005 269076 211012005 GENERAL SUPPLIES 101469 MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARK AS 50.00 MAINT FEE- JAN,FEB,MAR 105466 125.00 AQUATICS CONFERENCE 105603 020205 5310.6104 MAINT FEE- JAN,FEB,MAR 125.00 1/31/2005 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 269077 211012005 MAINT FEE- JAN,FEB,MAR 101779 MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATIO 1/31/2005 1646.6406, GENERAL SUPPLIES 235.00 CLASS FEE 105645 - INV163798 1120.6104 5820.6406 515.00 CLASS FEE 105646 INVIS4354 1120.6104 1/31/2005 750.00 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50.00 MAINT FEE- JAN,FEB,MAR 2/9/2005 8:08:50 Page - 18 Subledger Account Description Business Unit REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POOL ADMINISTRATION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 269078 2/10/2006 101410 MINNESOTA STATE BOARD OF ELECT 5.00 REQUEST INSPECT CERT BKS 105465 013105 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5.00 REQUEST INSPECT CERT BKS 106465 013105 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5.00 REQUEST INSPECT CERT BKS 105465 013105 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5.00 REQUEST INSPECT CERT BKS 105465 013105 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5.00 REQUEST INSPECT CERT BKS 105465 013105 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES, 50.00 MAINT FEE- JAN,FEB,MAR 105466 1/31/2005 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50.00 MAINT FEE- JAN,FEB,MAR 105466 1/31/2005 5912.6408 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50.00 MAINT FEE- JAN,FEB,MAR 105466 1/31/2005 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50.00 MAINT FEE- JAN,FEB,MAR 105466 1/31/2005 1646.6406, GENERAL SUPPLIES 50.00 MAINT FEE- JAN,FEB,MAR 105466 1/31/2005 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES . 50.00 MAINT FEE- JAN,FEB,MAR 105466 1/31/2005 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50.00 MAINT FEE- JAN,FEB,MAR 105466 1/31/2005 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 375.00 269079 2/10/2005 100699 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER 4,143.32 JAN 2005 105647 020105 1495.4360 SURCHARGE 4,143.32 269080 2/10/2006 102303 MINNESOTA VALLEY LANDSCAPE INC 3,926.48 FINAL PMT 105810 013105 4400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 3,926.48 269061 2110/2006 117714 MINNESOTA VALLEY WHOLESALE 1,395.00 LANDSCAPE REPAIRS 105693 55137 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,395.00 269062 2/10/200 103974 MN WEIGHTS AND MEASURES ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION CITY HALL GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING BUILDING MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL BUILDINGS CENT SVC PW BUILDING BUILDINGS CITY HALL GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE 50TH STREET GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL INSPECTIONS CITY HALUPOLICE BUILDING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1504.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 197.53 CITY OF EDINA 269088 2/9/2005 8:08:50 RSSCKREG LOG20000 115622 NORMANDALE CENTER FOR 5,180.00 2005 FUNDING 105653 012105 Council Check Register Page - 19 269089 2/10/2006 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY 2110/2005 — 2110/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 30998300 125.00 INSPECTION 0307988 105607 7539434359 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 100930 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO. 125.00 100.99 TIRE SERVICE 105468 269083 2110/2005 101658 MPELRA 269091 2/10/2006 116480 NSITE MYSTERY SHOPPING 250.00 WINTER CONFERENCE 105649 020105 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION 250.00 269084 2/10/2006 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 415.00 IRRIGATION FLOW VALVE 105608 447454 -00 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 26,789.01 FAIRWAY MOWER 105773 447941 -00 5400.1740 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT GOLF BALANCE SHEET 25,153.17 ROTARY MOWER 105774 447935-00 5400.1740 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT GOLF BALANCE SHEET 52,357.18 269085 2/10/2005 117711 NATCHEZ SHOOTERS SUPPLY 810.22 EAR PROTECTION 105650 700290 7412.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PSTF RANGE 810.22 269086 2/1012006 106066 NATURAL REFLECTIONS VII LLC 1,470.48 INSTALL/REMOVE ICE VENTS 105651 315 4086.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS 1,381.46 INSTALL/REMOVE ICE VENTS 105652 316 4086.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS 2,851.94 269087 211012006 104672 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 17.65 105467 679000121027 1120.6188 TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION 66.40 105467 679000121027 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 11348 105689 737969523-008 1495.6188 TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS 1504.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 197.53 269088 2/10/2005 115622 NORMANDALE CENTER FOR 5,180.00 2005 FUNDING 105653 012105 5,180.00 269089 2/10/2006 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY 245.90 ART SUPPLIES 105654 30976000 292.08 ART SUPPLIES 105655 30998300 537.98 269090 2110/2005 100930 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO. 100.99 TIRE SERVICE 105468 NW-94132 100.99 269091 2/10/2006 116480 NSITE MYSTERY SHOPPING 1504.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 VERNON SELLING 495.00 CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 269092 Council Check Register 50TH ST SELLING 101592 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN 2110/2005 - 2/10/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No . Account No Subledger Account Description 165.00 SECRET SHOPPING 105690 1094 5822.6406. GENERAL SUPPLIES 165.00 SECRET SHOPPING 105690 1094 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 165.00 SECRET SHOPPING 105690 1094 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2/9/2005 8:08:50 Page - 20 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING ED ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MAINTENANCE SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF DOME PROGRAM REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 495.00 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 269092 2/1012005 50TH ST SELLING 101592 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN 27.03 REGISTER TAPE, BATTERIES 105775 7918JO07 5610.6513 27.03 269093 2/1012005 101439 OLSEN FIRE INSPECTION 185.00 FIRE SPRINKLER INSPECTION 105656 2501101 1646.6103 185.00 269094 211012006 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC. 890.00 SERVICE CONTRACT 105609 81199 5210.6230 890.00 269096 2110/2006 117707 PARK JEEP 168.06 A -FRAME 105610 373807 1553.6530 168.06 269096 2110/2006 101718 PARTS PLUS 3,127.38 105691 012605 1553.6530 3,127.38 269097 2110/2005 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 1,744.10 105544 8059547 -IN 5862.5513 1,146.55 105738 8060093 -IN 5842.5513 1,313.40 105739 8060091 -IN 5862.5513 39.00 105855 8059723 -IN 5822.5513 687.00 105856 8060092 -IN 5822.5513 4,930.05 269098 2110/2005 110832 PC2 SOLUTIONS, INC. 70.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 105470 11505005 1554.6103 490.00 TECHNICAL CONTRACT SERVICE 105894 010105003 1554.6103 580.00 269099 2/10/2006 100946 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 186.00 105611 73869029 6630.5510 190.95 105811 72510517 5210.5510 376.95 OFFICE SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2/9/2005 8:08:50 Page - 20 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING ED ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MAINTENANCE SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF DOME PROGRAM REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD CENT SERV GEN MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENTENNIAL LAKES GOLF DOME PROGRAM R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # 269100 211012006 100949 PERSONNEL DECISIONS 6,150.00 FEE FOR SERVICE 6,150.00 269102 2/10/2005 100743 PHILLIPS WINE 6 SPIRITS 47.15 878.15 72.90 611.30 . 894.19 36.55 1,801.59 1,824.54 72.90 4.85 - 13.80- 4.17- 6.90- 3.90- 5.33- 7.58- 27.60- 7.58- 5.54 260.49 2,996.09 257.05- 536.15 2,482.20 2,465.32 3,637.05 2,023.50 1,166.85 231.45 605.50 22,299.57 CITY OF EDINA 2/9 /2005 8:08:50 Council Check Register Page - 21 2110/2005 - 2110/2005 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 105895 J308169 1490.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH 105545 2160514 5662.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 105546 2160513 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 105547 2160512 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE VERNON SELLING 105548 2160511 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 105549 2160506 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 105550 2160508 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 105551 2160510 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 105552 2160509 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 105553 2160507 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 105554 3312394 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 105555 3312393 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 105556 3312392 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 105557 3312395 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 105558 3312726 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 105559 3312725 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE YORK SELLING 105560 3312067 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 105561 3312065 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 105562 3312066 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 105563 3312068 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 105740 2144362 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 105741 2160515 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 105742 3311945 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE VERNON SELLING 105857 2162861 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 105858 2162862 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 105859 2162863 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 105860 2162860 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE 50TH ST SELLING 105861 2162857 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 105862 2162859 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 105863 2162856 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 105864 2162864 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 269103 2110/2006 105876 PICKERMAN'S SOUP AND SANDWICHE 138.13 SONIA'S SNACKS 105657 549 5111.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 138.13 CITY OF EDINA 2/9/2005 8:08:50 RSSCKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 22 2/10/2005 - 2/10/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 269104 211012005 105261 PRIMEDU\ WORKPLACE LEARNING 199.00 STREET SURVIVAL SEMINAR 105612 900514935 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 199.00 269105 211012005 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 652.54 105743 185030 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 495.39 105744 185515 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 569.03 105745 185514 5822.5513. COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 843.51 105746 185029 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 37.76- 105747 658575 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,632.56 105865 185513 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4',155.27 269106 211012006 102364 PRO GUARD 204.43 LACES, TIP WAX 105776 247559 5510.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA ADMINISTRATION 204.43 269107 2/10/2006 117721 PROSOURCE EDUCATIONAL SERVICES 870.00 ACCESS TRAINING 105812 020305. 1400.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 870.00 . 269108 211012005 100971 QUALITY WINE 14.25- 105748 510979-00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 1,445.94 105748 510979-00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,77- 105749 510952 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 279.25 105749 510952 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 10.93- 105750 510945-00 .5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 551.48 105750 510945-00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 36.30- 105751 510946-00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 1,819.90 105751 510946-00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 7.54- 105752 510975-00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 764,72 105752 510975-00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 46.73- 105753 511059-00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 2,354.57 105753 511059-00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 25.46- 105754 510976-00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 2,586.64 105754 510976-00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 93.92- 105755 508007 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 13,75- 105866 510976 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 1,388.90 105866 510978-00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 11.48- 105867 510977 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 1,160.90 105867 510977 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 12,087.17 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 2/9/2005 8:08:50 Council Check Register Page 23 2/10/2005 - 2110/2005 B Unit Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO 0 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Descnption us n... 269109 2/10/2005 101966 GWEST 65.23 952 927 -8861 105613 8861 -1105 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 54.57 952 929-0297 105814 0297 -1125 4090.6188 TELEPHONE STREET REVOLVING 86.39 952 929 -9549 105615 9549.1/25 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 206.19 269110 2/1012005 113422 RAKE PUBLISHING INC. 153.33 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 105692 5435 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 153.33 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 105692 5435 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 153.34 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 105692 5435 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 460.00 269111 2/10/2005 102327 RECREATION SPORTS OFFICIALS AS 1,728.00 OFFICIATING FEES 105471 013105 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 1,728.00 269112 2/1012005 102011 RIVER CITY JAZZ ORCHESTRA 150.00 PERFORMANCE 2/15/05 105693 020105 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 269113 2/10/2005 102614 ROTARY CLUB OF EDINA 255.00 DUES 105896 280 -2004 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 255.00 269114 2/10/2006 102491 S.O.TA. 520.00 TACTICAL CONFERENCE 105815 2129838 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 520.00 269116 211012005 100987 SA-AG INC 285.19 FILL SAND 105472 41312 5913.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK DISTRIBUTION 2,383.27 ICE CONTROL SAND 105694 41380 1318.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 2,668.46 269116 211012005 114489 SAVIN CORPORATION 98.07 COPIER MAINT AGREEMENT 105658 F012600293 -21 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 98.07 269117 211012006 100896 SBC PAGING 88.57 PAGERS 105813 020105 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 66.57 2/9/2005 8:08:50 Page - 24 Business Unit PSTF OCCUPANCY BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE SENIOR CITIZENS PARKING RAMP EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER REVENUES 125 00 PERFORMANCE 2117/05 105695 020105 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC -OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 125.00 CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 269123 211012006 101587 SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES 1,849.00 Council Check Register 105898 020105 1514.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2110/2005 - 2/1012005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 269118 2/1012006 106442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 84.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND 105777 ED031355 1470.4161 103.48 PARTICLE BOARD, LUMBER 105616 40018375 7411.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 17.75 LUMBER 105696 40023185 1646.6577 LUMBER 97.50 LUMBER, SCREWS 105814 40029250 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 70143083 5841.6250 218.73 186.50 269119 2/10/2005 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. 2110/2006 117426 SOMMERLAND, JUDY 476.82 QUARTERLY MAINTENANCE 105617. 8101223918 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 012805 5101.4413 510.54 QUARTERLY MAINTENANCE 105618 8101225096 1375.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 987.36 269127 2/1012005 101002. SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS INC 269120 211012005 106614 SCHIRO, DOUG 1,676.65 105756 159766 5642.5514 19.00 UPGRADE LICENSE 105619 020105 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS 159767 142.5515 19.00 269121 211012006 117299 SCHUH, CINDY 70.20 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 105897 011005 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 70.20 269122 2110/2005 104239 BEAGER, KRISTI 2/9/2005 8:08:50 Page - 24 Business Unit PSTF OCCUPANCY BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE SENIOR CITIZENS PARKING RAMP EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER REVENUES 125 00 PERFORMANCE 2117/05 105695 020105 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC -OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION DIAL- A-RIDE PROGRAM FIRE DEPT. GENERAL YORK OCCUPANCY ART CENTER REVENUES YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 125.00 269123 211012006 101587 SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES 1,849.00 DIAL- A-RIDE DEC 2004. 105898 020105 1514.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,849.00 269124 2/10/2005 117718 SHIELD FIRE PROTECTION INC. 84.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND 105777 ED031355 1470.4161 SPRINKLER PERMITS 84.00 269126 211012006. 105654 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 186.50 SPRINKLER INSPECTION 105697 70143083 5841.6250 ALARM SERVICE 186.50 269126 2110/2006 117426 SOMMERLAND, JUDY 374.27 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 105899. 012805 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 374.27 269127 2/1012005 101002. SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS INC 1,676.65 105756 159766 5642.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 69.25 105757 159767 142.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX DIAL- A-RIDE PROGRAM FIRE DEPT. GENERAL YORK OCCUPANCY ART CENTER REVENUES YORK SELLING YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA 2/9 /2005 8:08:50 RSSCKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 25 2/10/2005 - 2110/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 870.00 105758 159763 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,615.90 269128 211012005 101021 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC 1,886.13 CITY VEHICLE FUEL 105659 012605 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,886.13 269129 211012006 101004 SPS COMPANIES 22.41 COUPLINGS 105473 S1174694.001 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 144.52 BREAKER KIT, CLOSET KIT 105660 S1174286.001 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 276.71 TLT RETROFIT KIT 105661 S1173753.001 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 711.24 VALVES, CLAMPS 105698 S1176203.001 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 731.19 FLANGES, WATER HEATER 105699 S1177268.001 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 197.48 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 105778 S1173523.001 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 2,083.55 269130 211012005 116535 ST PAUL TRAVELERS 211.82 DEDUCTIBLE 105900 000204438 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 211.82 269131 2/10/2005 116176 ST. CROIX HARLEY- DAVIDSON 551.49 MOTORCYCLE MAINTENANCE 105620 1/27 STMT 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 551.49 269132 211012005 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC 70.99 CONNECTOR, TERMINALS 105474 S135308 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 37.55 FILTER 105475 S135014 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 9.07 WASHERS 105476 S135015 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 305.28 SHANKS 105477 S135133 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 422.89 269133 211012006 108680 ST. PAUL UTILITIES INC. . 11,840.00 SITE UTILITIES 105901 APPL 2 7400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS PSTF BALANCE SHEET 11,840.00 269134 2/10/2006 102193 STAN BANN BIG BAND 100.00 PERFORMANCE 2/13/05 105700 020105 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 100.00 269135 2/10/2005 117715 STEPHENSON. WILLARD 589.26 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 105902 020105 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 589.26 CITY OF EDINA 218/2005 8:08:50 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register. page.; 26 2/10/2005 — 2/10/2005 Cheek # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Acoount Description Business Unit 269136 2110/2005 101015 STREICHERS 85.09 HEADLIGHT FLASHER 105478 1242488 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 413.49. GUN CLEANING SUPPLIES 105662 1243183 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 425.73 FUSEE 105779 1228096 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,629.34 LIGHTBAR, SWITCH 105816 1244175 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 52.13 POUCH 105903 1210994 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,605.78 269137 2110/2006 104349 STRUCTURED NETWORK SOLUTIONS 664.02 DATA INSTALLATION 105904 11699 05414.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS SCADA WATERMAIN 664.02 269138 211012006 117706 STS CONSULTANTS LTD 327.12 STREET IMPROVEMENTS 105621 266133 01312.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA312 BRIDGE LN & TOWNES RD 545.20 STREET IMPROVEMENTS 105621 266133 01.216:1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN SCHAEFER RD WESTWOOD - INTERLA 545.21 STREET IMPROVEMENTS 105621 266133 01199.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 6600 RIDGE RD MILL & OVERLAY 545.21 STREET IMPROVEMENTS 105621 266133 01217.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN RECONSTRUCT SCHAEFER CIRCLE 954.12 STREET IMPROVEMENTS 105621 266133 03420.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN SS SHANNON DEWWEY TO KEMRICH 1,090.41 STREET IMPROVEMENTS 105621 266133 01218.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN RECLAIM ROLLING GRN BYWOOD 1,144.93 STREET IMPROVEMENTS 105621 266133 01328.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 58TH - CONCORD TO WOODDALE 1,281.23 STREET IMPROVEMENTS 105621 266133 01326.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN SUNNYSLOPE ST RECLAIM 1,526.57 STREET IMPROVEMENTS 105621 266133 01204.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BROOKVIEW - 52 TO 54 RECLAIM 7,960.00 269139 2/10/2006 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 48.40 GUARD PACKAGE 105479 373287 -1CVW 1553.6530. REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 48.40 269140 211012005- 105304 SUPERIOR CONCRETE PRODUCTS 2,211.32 CONCRETE PROD 105905 5537- WP -R1480 1344.6577 LUMBER RETAINING WALL MAINTENANCE 2,211.32 269141 211012006 117716 TABOR, CAROYLN 22.00 PROGRAM REFUND 105908 020105 1800.4390.01 PLAYGROUND PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 22.00 269142 211012006 101036 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 41.25 105868 381810 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 41.25 269143 211012001 114701 TIME WARNER CABLE R55CKREG LOG20000 25.00 CITY OF EDINA 269148 211012005 Council Check Register 2/10/2005 - 2/10/2005 FOOD Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 50.62 CABLE 105780 012605 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 50.62 269144 2/10/2005 SPLICE KITS, PROBE 116411 TRINITY MEDICAL SOLUTIONS INC. 923984 5911.6530 REPAIR PARTS 501.13 UNIFORMS 105817 4175 5620.6201 LAUNDRY 269160 501.13 103690 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 269146 2110/2005 103121 TURTLE BAY BUILDING SERVICE IN 1,864.00 WATER MAIN REPAIR 105481 9123 5913.6180 985.13 FEB SERVICE 105818 3008 5620.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 105701 9137 985.13 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 3,155.49 269146 2/10/2006 9127 101066 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA CONTRACTED REPAIRS 2/9/2005 8:08:50 Page - 27 Business Unit ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK 675.00 2005 MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE 105480 013105 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 675.00 269147 2110/2006 101056 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 25 00 REDUCING TOBACCO USE 105781 020405 1490.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PUBLIC HEALTH CENTENNIAL LAKES PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION CENT SVC PW BUILDING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 25.00 269148 211012005 101908 US FOODSERVICE INC 547.60 FOOD 105782 33365661 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 547.60 269149 211012005 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 84.15 SPLICE KITS, PROBE 105622 923984 5911.6530 REPAIR PARTS 84.15 269160 2/10/2006 103690 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 1,864.00 WATER MAIN REPAIR 105481 9123 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 2,887.00 WATER MAIN REPAIR 105701 9137 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 3,155.49 WATER MAIN REPAIR 105702 9127 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 4,048.49 WATER MAIN REPAIR 105703 9119 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 11,954.98 269161 2110/2005 101068 VAN PAPER CO. 166.41 PLATES, BOWLS, NAPKINS 105482 566634 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 646.34 BAGS, TISSUE, PLATES 105623 565202 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 6.06 CLEANER 105624 565694 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 290.78 BAGS 105663 567181 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 1,109.59 269152 2/10/2006 103252 VEAP CENTENNIAL LAKES PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION CENT SVC PW BUILDING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA 2/9/2005 8:08:50 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 28 2/10/2005 - 2/10/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 16,000.00 2005 FUNDING 105704 020205 1504.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION 16,000.00 269163 2/10/2006 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 20.79 BELTS 105705 12305002 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 20.79 269164 2/1012006 102499 VIEWPOINT INTERNATIONAL 49.66 MERCHANDISE 105819 8183481 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 49.68 269166 2110/2006 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 750.83 LAMPS 105820 15001383-00 1375.6530, REPAIR PARTS PARKING RAMP 750.83 269166 2/10/2006 101743 WAGERS INC. 22.61 COPIER MAINTENANCE 105783 CNIN021040 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 22.61 269167 2110/2005 101328 WALBRIDGE, DAVID 200.00 BEACH PARTY 2/12/05 105706 020305 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 200.00 269168 2110/2006 101076 WEST PHOTO 137.86 MEDIA SUPPLIES 105664 4242 5125.5570 COST OF GOODS SOLD . MEDIA STUDIO 137.86 269159 211012006 101078 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT 207.50 GAS PUMP REPAIRS 105483 0027355 -IN 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 244.00 GAS PUMP REPAIRS 105484 0027299 -IN 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 412.90 GAS PUMP REPAIRS 105485 0027352 -IN 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 459.02 PUMP 105486 0027364 -IN 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 731.00 FUEL PUMP REPAIRS 105821 0027408 -IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2.054.42 269160 2110/2006 116768 WET PAINT INC. 44.25 MASA 105665 008461 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 44.25 269161 2/10/2006 101053. WINE COMPANY, THE 1,533.50 105564 108551 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 686.90 105759 108836 -00 842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation 757.20 244.80 3,222.40 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 2/10/2005 - 2110/2005 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 105869 108952 -00 5862.5513 105870 108954-00 5822.5513 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 2/9/2005 8:08:50 Page 29 Business Unit VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 269162 211012005 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 414.07 105565 115757 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 781.78 105871 116282 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 814.68 105872 116283 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 839.53 105873 115758 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,850.06 269163 2110/2006 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 594.27 105760 160696 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 532.75 105874 160764 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,127.02 269164 2/10/2006 112752 WPS- MEDICARE PART B 314.18 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 105907 020105 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 314.18 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 105908 211 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 628.36 269166 211012006 101726 XCEL ENERGY 4,289.15 105487 0322363655027 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENERAL 524.85 105488 1746737629025 5913.8185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 7.43 105489 1375390650024 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 26.71 105490 1263610010024 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 129,28 105491 0920152567027 1481.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK FIRE STATION 930.28 105491 0920152567027 1470.6185 LIGHT & POWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 52.76 105492 1671793348025 1460.6185 LIGHT & POWER CIVILIAN DEFENSE 27,056.71 105493 1190923893027 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 73.40 105494 0113885804027 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 7,653.28 105495 1215173122027 5620.6185 LIGHT & POWER EDINBOROUGH PARK 18.26 105496 1281698281027 4086.6185 LIGHT & POWER AQUATIC WEEDS P21.08 105497 1554936687027 5430.6185 LIGHT & POWER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 1,574.42 105498 2175962411027 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 128.76 105499 0841469985027 5932.6185 LIGHT & POWER GENERAL STORM SEWER 316.95 105500 1159385995027 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 417.32 105501 2170773325027 5311.6185 LIGHT & POWER POOL OPERATION 111,41 105502 0042688577027 5933.6185 LIGHT & POWER PONDS & LAKES 3,087.88 105503 1002656716027 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER 4,588.54 105504 1860198788027 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 1,326.15 105666 1901376459026 7411.6185 LIGHT & POWER PSTF OCCUPANCY CITY OF EDINA 2/9/2005 8:08:50 R65CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 30 2/10/2005 — 2/10/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 615.04 105667 0746597713028 5821.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50TH ST QCCUPANCY 976.82 105667 0746597713028 5861.6185 LIGHT & POWER VERNON OCCUPANCY 1,393.28 105687 0746597713028 5841.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK OCCUPANCY 1,419.69 105668 2163178392028 1628.6185 LIGHT & POWER SENIOR CITIZENS 14,171.15 105822 2212719485031 5511.8185 LIGHT & POWER ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 71,112.60 269167 2110/2005 100668 XEROX CORPORATION 355.13 JAN USAGE - ADMIN 105823 007792383 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 111.41 JAN USAGE - BLDG/ENG 105824 007792385 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 120.24 JAN USAGE - P &R 105825 0077923.86 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 586.78 269168 211012006 104324 YOUNGBLOOD LUMBER CO. 55.21 PARTICLE BOARD 105625 449959 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 55.21 269169 2/10/2005 102600 ZIMMERMAN, TIM 71.97 UNIFORM PURCHASE 105826 020405 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 93.96 UNIFORM PURCHASE 105827 020305 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 165.93 520,623.40 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 520,623.40 Total Payments 520,623.40 R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 2/9/2005 8:16:13 Council Check Summary Page - 1 2/10/2005 - 2/1012005 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 166,607.08 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 2,583.77 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 17,755.50 04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND 3,376.81 05100 ART CENTER FUND 2,556.04 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 3,185.11 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 542.32 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 56,630.43 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 15,295.45 05600 EDINBOROUGH/CENT LAKES FUND 14,256.23 05800 LIQUOR FUND 158,052.52 05900 UTILITY FUND 56,817.04 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 4,034.99 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 18,930.11 Report Totals 520,623.40 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing pglicies and Procedures dat l` City f�1J��4� • r i / ,j February 2, 2005 Edina City Council 4801 West 50a' Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland; Council Members Housh, Masica, and Swenson; and City Staff: Thank you for the opportunity to speak before the City Council on Tuesday, February 1, in support of policy change to road reconstruction special assessments. I appreciate your efforts to revise this policy away from 100 percent assessments to homeowners. Being able to share my views with the Council was empowering. In particular, I would like to reinforce the following key points: • Residents of a townhome.association own their roads, an ownership acknowledged through . signing legally binding by -laws. Residents, therefore, expect to pay 100 percent of road reconstruction. However, a city roadway that is maintained by the city and shared by the residents implies less than a 100 percent assessment to homeowners. • Though working session models were just that, models, I feel that expecting residents to shoulder even 70 percent of a special assessment is burdensome — especially if the floor contribution of residents is a lofty $5,000. A $7,000 assessment with a hypothetical $5,000 minimum contribution of homeowners and a 70 percent homeowner contribution would still result in a $6,400 assessment. For the homeowner, this would still be a 92 percent assessment. I would hardly consider this relief from the financial burden of a special assessment. • I don't think it is unreasonable for Edina homeowners to share the financial burden roughly 50 -50 with the city; and I don't think it would be unreasonable for residents to contribute a floor well below $5,000. In such a model, a $7,000 assessment with a hypothetical $1,000 minimum contribution of homeowners and a 45 percent homeowner contribution would result in a $3,700 homeowner payment.7his would result in the resident paying approximately 53 percent of the assessment. For a $10,000 assessment, this model would result in a homeowner contribution of $5,050, or 51 percent of the assessment. Though double Bloomington's homeowner assessment rate, this seems much more equitable than either the current practice or the models in the February 1 Working Session. • In moving to Edina, my family would not have considered high city taxes to be a deterrent, given the service benefits one expects as an Edina resident; namely, the outstanding public schools. I greaily benefited from attending the Working Session at 5:30. I appreciated the tirne and planning that went into such detailed: financial modeling. I hope that my financial' illustrations above illuminate the potential pitfalls of revising this policy to the minimal benefit of the assessed. To provide real financial relief to those being assessed, the city must truly share the burden. The tax consequences of true change will not be insignificant. Yet, as Council member Masica pointed out, tough decisions must be made for the future. 5941 Grimes Avenue South, 55424 ♦ 952- 922 -1207 (H) ♦ 651- 604 -4101 (W) jblumenthal @minneapolisbusinesscollege.edu 5233 MINNEHAHA BOULEVARD EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 763 -522 -2100 (OFFICE) February 3, 2005 Mr. Gordon Hughes City Manager Edina City Hall 4801 West 50'h Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Hughes: We read with interest the difficult issues that the City Council is in the process of addressing relating to the City of Edina's Assessment Policy. We commend you for addressing this difficult and serious economic issue. However, in confronting this issue, we do not want you to lose sight of the fact that not all improvements are wanted or needed. Our neighborhood (Minnehaha Boulevard) was recently contacted by the Public Works department about a street, water and alley project. We provided the City Staff with a near unanimous petition (every neighbor signed in opposition to the projects, one declined to indicate one way or the other) against all three parts of the proposal. We are all heartened that our message is being heard and that the projects are not going forward. We are pleased that the City Manager and Public Works Director and their staff have been most responsive to us and have been sensitive to our communications and the neighborhood consensus. We wish to emphasize that while the assessments were a factor, the neighborhood was against these projects for reasons other than cost. Our opposition was not based on the assessment policy. It was based on our "near unanimous" judgement that the improvements were not necessary, were not wanted, and were not appropriate. Without going into all the details on a subject that is not really before you, we trust that the City will honor the desires of our neighborhood when we oppose improvements for reasons other than the proposed assessment. Our point is that it is not simply economics but our strong, legitimate objections to non -value adding improvements. !► Minneapolis City of Lakes City Council Dean Zimmermann Council Member, Sixth Ward 350 South 5th Street - Room 307 Minneapolis MN 55415 -1383 Office 612 673 -2206 Fax 612 673 -3940 TTY 612 673 -2157 February 11, 2005 The Honorable Mayor And Council Members of Edina C/o Edina City Clerk 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Re: Application for appointment to Edina City Council Dear Mayor and Council Members: I am pleased to recommend Mr. Ralph Overholt, Esq. in his application for appointment to Edina City Council. Here at the City of Minneapolis, I serve as the City Council Member representing the Sixth Ward. As a Council Member, I establish policy through the support of our community from a variety of committees. I have had the pleasure of numerous conversations with Ralph over lunches during the days he sits as a Conciliation Court Judge. He can bring an enlightened energetic voice to meetings with a critical approach to integrating his academic and professional interests. I have known Mr. Overholt over the last several years. I believe he possesses the ability to listen and synthesize citizen input to formulate policy. He already possesses a juris doctor degree, and I find his interest in acquiring the skills needed for public leadership to be most refreshing. He would make a fine addition to the Edina City Council. Sincerely, t Dean Zimmermann Council Member, Sixth Ward www.d.minneapolis.mmus Affirmative Action Employer Barbara Carlson 4811 Wesilrook ]wane ma, Minnesota 55436 -f- The Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers of Edina c/o City Clerk City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Re: Aonh� on of mph Uverholt for jppomtment to Tama c;a c;ouncu Dear Mayor and Councilmembers: I am pleased to recommend Mr. Ralph Overholt, Esq. in his application for appointment to Edina City Council. While I was a councilwoman for the City of Minneapolis, I undertook a great many stands to establish City policy. Mr. Overholt will be an equally great voice to your meetings and possesses an exceptional combination of talents. I have no reservation in recommending his appointment to the Edina City Council. Please contact me if I can provide you with additional information. jUl IQAV�.hV6.��� ce 6�91 rel Barbara Carlson James Hovland, Mayor Scot Housh, Council Member Linda Masica, Council Member Ann Swenson, Council Member City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 I support the application of Ralph Overholt for appointment to Edina City Council because: • He represents Edina through his connections with our church, school, civic and athletic institutions. • He will be a positive force for the City by finding opportunities instead of problems. • Finally, he will help insure we get satisfaction for our government services by listening and advocating on our behalf. Thank you for your support, time and courtesy. Very truly yours, (Name) (Address) f5c1o'nc,' /U 4) S.SK39 (City, state & Zip Code) Sa - '?Yd - :7s 73 (Telephone) February 9, 2005 James Hovland, Mayor of Edina City of Edina 4801 50g' Street West Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland, I would like to recommend Doug Johnson for the vacant City Council seat. Given Doug's extensive involvement in our community and his passion for our community, I feel he would be an asset to the Council. As a fellow community member and co- worker of Doug's, I feel I can recommend him on a professional level. Doug excels in his position as Director of Community Education Services. He does so for a variety of reasons. In every aspect of Doug's job, his sense of fairness is exhibited. He is able to lead and direct in a way that allows him to get the most from his staff, thus achieving the program's goals. Doug possesses the greatest necessity to be an effective leader and certainly to be a valuable council member; his ability to listen and to formulate ideas and solutions. The bonus is the respect he shows to everyone he works with. Doug is an extremely dedicated and hardworking individual whose character is above reproach. His passion for our community coupled with his extensive knowledge of so many facets of our community and school district, make him an excellent candidate for the vacant seat. How fortunate, we as a community, would be to have Doug represent us. Sincerely, Jennife kaug Operations Manager Edina Community Education S70 / 10CIiP`90101)1� c- ,6/ ,4 173 /U 2/13/05 James Hovland, Mayor City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina MN 55424 RE: Application of Ralph Overholt for appointment to Edina City Council Dear Mr. Hovland: I support the appointment of Ralph Overholt to Edina City Council. Mr. Overholt represents the best of Edina in many ways: His activities and contributions to church, school, athletic programs and the arts illustrate his commitment and dedication to our community. I have seen this work and its benefits myself and am grateful that we have such citizens. Also, having worked professionally with Mr. Overholt, I would like to attest to his positive approach to challenges. He is a skilled negotiator and creative innovator of solutions that are positive. The word "can -do" really applies to his approach to helping clients and approaching challenges. I am sure that Mr. Overholt's positive attitude and approach would be a great benefit to our city. His skills at listening, problem solving and communicating positively will help us all achieve the representation and the government that will insure Edina'.s continued success. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Stuart Abraham 4020 W. 44th St. Edina MN 55424 952 - 927 -6831 February 119 2005 Mayor and City Council Members c/o Edina City Clerk_ 4801', W:. 50th Street Edina, MN: 55424 Dear Mayor and Council Members, L.have been an Edina resident and voter since 1977,. Never before have I openly and heartily supported: a, candidate for municipal office.. But 1-wish to do so noww Please appoint Ralph Overholt to the vacant Council seat. An outstanding father, husband,;frieud,, iiiwyer, and community member, Ralph is- knowledgeable about local issues and. opportunities.. More than that, however, he: is committed to doing what's best for the whole , not jus neighborhood or special interest. He lie tons. He learns. And he A ts. F,�ank'fy, I cannot gine 4 better person to fill tharIcurrent vacancy.. Ralph w u d unqu tionably bring an a measure of ;.,4 -eii; tr ance And cariDg t the+ Counci With best wis 440a Morn i gside Road Edina, MN 5416 952 - 925 -538 Tom LaForce 5901 Tingdale Avenue Edina, MN 55436 Jim Hovland Mayor Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Jim, I'm writing in support of Ardis Wexler's application for the Edina City Council. I've worked with Ardis on a variety of community projects over the years. She is a dedicated volunteer. She works hard, does what she says she's going to do, and sticks with a problem until it is solved. The thing I most appreciate about Ardis is her judgment and reasoned perspectives on just about any issue. Whenever I am concerned about which way to turn in a particular situation, Ardis is usually right at the top of my list of opinions that I seek out. She knows this community and is able to find the right path in what often are difficult circumstances. Ardis would make a wonderful addition to Edina's City Council. I appreciate you giving her your full consideration during this application process. Sincerely, Tom LaForce Jim RHODES STATE REPRESENTATIVE 1993 -2004 RHODES VOLUNTEER COMMITTEE 3408 Rhode Island Avenue South St. Louis Park, MN 55426 February 7, 2005 Mayor Jim Hovland 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland, I am writing this letter of support for Ardis Wexler to fill the vacancy on the Edina City Council. I have known Ardis Wexler for over 30 years. I have found that Ardis's approach is that partisan pp �} l Pes not have a place in good city government, although she has been active politically. What is important is her interest and commitment to the community. With a history of service on bdat& atid cot iiuhity organizations, including but not limited to Parks and Rec, Human Relations, Golf League, League of Women Voters and over 25 years service as an election judge. Ardis Wexler would make a fine addition to your city council. A a former legislator I have known and worked with many local government elected officials. I truly believe that Ardis Wexler would make a fine addition to the Edina City Council. Yours J' Rhodes State, c- Live.l ` i1:S;.r. 1!i7tl1C� i�;'i: '•;ji! ;li 'I�i�i':Il'lr,,J tr (�1.1j � /t1i.l�Sfl1 J jr, (:f'l 111 1 1. U('.ilC.I }•'.r. ..l-. Prepared and paid for by the Rhodes Volunteer Committee, 3408 Rhode Island South, St. Louis Park, MN 55426 City of Edina 4801 W. 501h Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 1 February 2005 To the Mayor of Edina and Members of the Edina City Council: It is my distinct pleasure to write a letter supporting Doug Johnson's application for the open seat on the Edina City Council. In my role as librarian at Edina High School, I have worked with Doug on a number of projects. Several years ago he spearheaded a plan to help build the feeling of community at Edina High School. Coordinating a group of parents, community members and high school staff, Doug led the planning of a school year kick -off event. So successful was the event, it was repeated the following year. Furthermore, a similar event was held at the middle schools that same year. As director of community education for Edina Public Schools, Doug is always looking for ways to bring together the community and the schools. For several years, he has worked to help coordinate career and volunteer fairs at EHS. At these events, students and sometimes their parents, too could learn about post high school activities. These events are special because they pair together the schools and the community and in doing so, help to build a stronger Edina. Any time schools and community members have a positive experience, both parties benefit. A hallmark of these fairs is that many of them have also been done in conjunction with young men who were earning their Eagle Scout badges. Doug empowered these students to take leadership roles in planning the events. Of those students who took on the challenge, they have all earned their Eagle Scout merit badges, one is now at the Air Force Academy and another is a Regents Scholar at St. Olaf College. Surely, the opportunities provided by their school and their communities helped in shaping these young men. Doug has a great vision for programs, the Edina community and schools and the ability to bring together many different people to make things happen. He's budget conscious and gifted in finding various funding sources. There's something about his leadership style that when one project is done, despite all the work, you find yourself asking him "What can we do next ?" That sort of vision, passion for the Edina community and leadership is something I think would be welcomed on the Edina City Council. Sincerely, S� S� Sara Swenson Librarian Edina High School 6754 Valley View Road Edina, Minnesota 55439 Home: 6973 Langford Court Edina, Minnesota 55436 February 3, 2005 James Hovland Mayor of Edina City of Edina 4801— 50`h Street W Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland: I am writing in reference to Doug Johnson, an applicant for the vacant City Council seat. I would highly recommend Doug for this position. I have worked with Doug for the past 10 years in the Community Education Services department of Edina Public Schools. Doug is an extremely hard worker who is exhaustively resourceful. He has lived in the Edina community for several years and has tremendous involvement in several areas. His knowledge of the community and the politics involved is extensive. He is well respected by our organization and viewed as a true leader with a vision. He has the energy, knowledge and drive to serve Edina well. As a resident of Edina, I would be very happy to see Doug serve in this capacity. It would be my strong recommendation to consider Doug Johnson for the council position. Thank you for your consideration. If you should want any further information on Doug, please feel free to contact me at 952- 848 -3974. Sincerely, Cathy B tenstein Edina Community Education FIR/Finance Specialist, Operations Manager James Hovland, Mayor, City of Edina, MN 4801 West 50" Street Edina, MN Dear Mayor Hovland, In connection with your consideration of applications to fill the City Council vacancy, I wish to lend my support to Mr. Doug Johnson to fill that vacancy. While Doug has served as Director of Community Education Services, it has been my privilege to work with him in associations I have had over the past 9 years in various volunteer opportunities, such as the Community Education Service Board, Community Education Adult Enrichment Council and a variety of Connecting with Kids activities. I see Doug as a model of citizenship. He is committed to community enrichment as evidenced by the growth of life -long learning opportunities for all, from pre - schoolers to senior citizens. He is responsive to and imaginative in ways and means to make our community better, as evidenced by the leadership roles he has filled in Connecting with Kids initiatives. Doug is remarkably personable and very knowledgeable in the underlying philosophies of Edina's public education, which are readily seen in the proceedings of the many advisory boards he works with so adeptly. He also recognizes that community enrichment entails working cooperation among all our social institutions. I see him as energetic, cheerful and constant in his beliefs of the value of his work. He is a good example to follow. Doug Johnson has much to offer to city government and would be a valuable addition to the council. Please consider his application carefully. Sincerely yours, Dick Lund Ann 74, � oo- ve- 7 /l try .�-/ %JO f/4' J P hl�t.SUy✓ G�� �/ %G� �"sjl� U / 00 �a v Lqr 6 irr n v r» vn r/� 7t, f—` /:;S� Mello jo v 16"o w �f ha�� Coro ��' /� G�Jd v /G� n w � � �o vJc� ✓v �nsa „� ' /'.� %ill Off` st�f- ✓� /�-r /1 y ���G.�i t� sue- - Ewa o f ►..� p -� l4'� s r P T S'� p /�' G�-P �v d c ✓ a' h ►'�� 0 i'tf (// PJ' i r'� 7 A ce c I �� g/' l� e c-� t. � W r � � rs •�'� �C�, -� � L o n �r i� vh .� we m ,•ems 0 %ill Off` st�f- ✓� /�-r /1 y ���G.�i t� sue- - Ewa o f ►..� p -� l4'� s r P T 1:1071►I:1717 :GIL:C 7:00 P.M. EDINA COMMUNITY ROOM EDINA CITY HALL NOVEMBER 9, 2004 MEMBERS PRESENT: George Klus, Karla Sitek, Alice Hulbert, Jeff Johnson, Jeff Sorem, Mike Weiss, Mike Damman MEMBERS ABSENT: Andy Finsness, Floyd Grabiel, Linda Presthus STAFF PRESENT: John Keprios, Ed MacHolda, Janet Canton, Tom Shirley OTHERS PRESENT: Jon Girard, Doug Nessan I. APPROVAL OF THE TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 2004 PARK BOARD MINUTES Mike Weiss MOVED TO APPROVE THE OCTOBER 12, 2004 PARK BOARD MINUTES. Mike Damman SECONDED THE MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED. II. CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK Mr. Keprios indicated that he received a letter from Mike Kojetin, Managing Agent from Laukka Management, Inc., informing him that the Village Homes at Centennial Lakes Board of Directors are concerned about bike riders, skate boarders and roller bladders on Centennial's pathways. Mr. Shirley explained that Mr. Kojetin informed him that the Board of Directors from the Village Homes are suggesting that the city look at banning bikes from Centennial Lakes Park. Mr. Keprios pointed out that they have never banned bikes at Centennial Lakes with one exception to which bikes were banned only during the park's initial construction period. Mr. Shirley added that in August of 1991, during construction, they did post signs around the immediate vicinity of the Centrum Building stating that all wheeled vehicles must be walked. He noted that the Centrum Building is where the concerts were first held. Mr. Shirley informed the Park Board that they really haven't had any issues with bikes other than once or twice a year people call and ask if it's okay to ride bikes. He added that there really are not very many bike riders going through the park because it's just not conducive to riding there. Mr. Keprios suggested to the Park Board that he contact the Board from the Village Homes at Centennial Lakes and see if they are looking for a formal action from the Park Board and if so they should attend the next Park Board meeting. He stated that staff's t position right now is that they don't see it as a major problem; there has never been an accident that we are aware of; however, we will continue to monitor the situation. III. UPDATES A. Indoor Athletic Field Facility — Mr. Keprios indicated that Mr. MacHolda did some research and contacted the user groups to see how many hours they would be willing to commit if an indoor athletic field facility were built at Braemar. He noted that what he found was out of 1,200 available rental hours the groups could commit to approximately a total of only 200 hours. Mr. Keprios pointed out that because of the results the City Council has decided to put this on hold indefinitely until they can be shown there is a greater demand and validated need for it. He noted that they would like to see what happens to the other communities who have built indoor field facilities. Mr. Keprios pointed out that the City Council appreciates what the Park Board did to study and address this issue. Mr. Klus pointed out that Mr. Grabiel and Dr. Hulbert both attended the City Council meeting. Dr. Hulbert asked the Park Board whether or not they think the article that appeared in the Sun Current regarding the athletic field should receive a response from them. Mr. Keprios replied that he has learned from past experience that it does not pay to respond to-what was written-in the newspaper.- He noted that he thinks the writer is- misinformed, however, he is entitled to his opinion. Mr. Klus pointed out if what he wrote were true he would think there would have been a lot more people attending tonight's Park Board meeting. B. Gymnasiums - Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that the proposal to build two gymnasiums at the community center campus is on a real fast track. He explained that the project would be totally funded by the city through lease revenue bonds for approximately four to five million dollars. He noted that Mr. Hughes and he have already met with the architect and the construction manager. He pointed out that they are the same architect firm and construction manager that were picked during the Blue Ribbon Committee process. Mr. Keprios explained that currently there are some questions as to whether or not there are special footings for the South View Middle School gym that may need to be built now which would be a $20,000 financial risk for the city if the proposal is terminated later in the process. The city would also be at risk for approximately an additional $35,000 for preliminary architect fees to conduct the program design phase. Mr. Keprios pointed out that the concept as it goes forward is that the city would cover all of the bonds as well as the operational expenses which are estimated to be approximately $40,000 a year. He indicated that notices have been sent to residents who live within 500 feet of the community center campus. He noted that these residents have been invited to attend a Public Hearing with both the Board of Education and the City Council on November 16`n Mr. Keprios again stated that the $40,000 operational expenses would solely be the responsibility of the city. He explained that the school district would actually become 2 one of the facility user groups that would pay rent to use the gyms. The two new gyms would be charged the same rate as the other gyms and whatever revenues are collected on the new gyms would go to offset the operational expenses of the two new gyms. Mr. Keprios commented that there obviously is going to be a shortfall and therefore they would rely on approximately an $8.00 per participant per season user fee much like they do for the field user fees. He added that there would also be an $8.00 per person charge to the school district for their priority use times such as with Kids Club, etc. Mr. Keprios pointed out that the school district would continue to do all of the permitting for the facilities. Mr. Keprios indicated that the meeting he had today with Ken Dragseth, Doug Johnson and Jay Willemssen regarding the facility use agreement was a very positive meeting. He stated there are some donors who have now committed to giving $5,000 per year for ten years to help offset the operating expenses. Mr. Keprios also stated that the Edina Community Foundation is helping find additional donations to cover operational expenses of the new gyms for an even greater extended period of time. Mr. Keprios stressed that he wants to make it very clear that the school district will have no risks financially regardless of whether or not it goes through. He noted that we hope this will help eliminate any similar problems and fears that people had with the 2001 referendum. All financial risk will rest with the city and not the school district. Mr. Klus asked Mr. Keprios why don't they use money from the Developer's Fund for a project like this. Mr. Keprios replied that when they say Developer's Fund they need to be careful how they use the term. He explained there's a general parks developer's fund, which is funded through development of land for which 8% of the value of the land, goes towards developing and improving the parks. They can either give a portion of the land or cash in lieu of the land to which they typically always take the cash, however, the money has to be used for parks and cannot be used for anything else. Mr. Keprios stated that he thinks the fund Mr. Klus is referring to is the Trust Fund for Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Park. He explained that if the City Council ever decided to they could use what's left of that trust fund for other park use. He pointed out that from the start the concept for the trust fund at Edinborough and Centennial Lakes was to use the interest earnings from that to help pay for the operations of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Park. He noted that this affords us to offer all of the recreation programs and concerts at Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Park without additional fees and charges. Mr. Keprios commented that the trust fund used to be as high as 9 million dollars and is now approximately 4.7 million dollars. Mr. Klus indicated, for example, at Edinborough Park they are going to actually make money, which they have not been able to do in the past. Mr. Keprios stated that Edinborough and Centennial Lakes are considered one enterprise budget and they are getting close to a break -even scenario. He noted that after they pay bonds and interest on their debt and all of their capital expenses this will probably be the first time they won't have to rely on taking a portion of that trust fund to pay their cash debt at the end of the year. Mr. Keprios explained that the problem they've had is they used to have a balance of 9 million dollars, however, there have been some years where they had some big losses. He noted that he really applauds Mr. Shirley because this will 3 be the first year ever that they will probably see a balanced budget and won't have to keep picking away at the trust fund. Mr. Klus asked if technically that money could be used for other things within the city. Mr. Keprios replied that technically it could; however, that would be City Council's decision. Mr. Klus asked if the city was so inclined to could they put some of the money towards a project like this? Mr. Keprios responded that they could but it would be kind of like robbing Peter to pay Paul. It's still the taxpayer's money because Edinborough and Centennial Lakes are still going to have to rely on some of the interest earnings from that in order to have a break -even budget. If they don't break even now it's going to go back to the taxpayers year after year. Mr. Keprios explained that it would be ideal if we could increase that trust fund to a level where the park maintenance and operations would be self - supportive. Mr. Klus asked Mr. Keprios if Edinborough Park and Centennial Lakes make money would he rather see that money go back into the Developer's Fund. Mr. Keprios replied that he would like to see it go into their trust fund to keep Edinborough and Centennial Lakes well maintained and fund its own improvements. Mr. Klus noted that he thinks it's important for the Park Board to know that the developer's fund is there and if there's a project that the Park Board thinks they should look into they should be able to express that to the City Council. Mr. Klus noted that he sees the developer's fund as something the Park Board should talk about once in a while and challenge each other about how they use that money. He added that it -is -a pot of money that is there for the use of the city for the parks. Mr. Keprios pointed out that he believes the balance of the general park developer's fund that they relied on heavily during the early years of growth and development of the park system; however, it currently has less than $100,000 and we need to keep in mind that Edina is just about 100% developed. Mr. Keprios noted that they anticipate approximately another $14,000 to be added to that within the next seven years but after that essentially they will be done. Mr. Keprios commented that it's kind of a sacred trust fund right now; however, it's always open for discussion. IV. 2005 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Mr. Klus noted that Mr. Keprios has indicated that there are three things that he would like for the Park Board to look at since this was tabled at the last Park Board meeting. The three items are the Braemar multi - purpose athletic field, the Braemar maintenance garage at Courtney Field and replacing the playground equipment at Kojetin Park. Mr. Keprios explained to the Park Board that he believes they are still on track to replace /repair what's worn or broken. He pointed out that looking over the next five years there's very little that's new that's being added to the park system, it's pretty much fix what's broken and repair and maintain what we have. Mr. Keprios stated that as he sees it if they are going to add a lot of infrastructure then it becomes more of a referendum type item. Mr. Keprios explained that staff prioritizes the capital plan according to what they analyze to be the most critical the needs. He noted that on paper the schedule calls for specific years for playground replacement but after doing their onsite visits the schedule 4 changes due to their current conditions. The playground equipment at Kojetin Park, which is wood frame equipment, clearly is the. first one that needs to be replaced. Mr. Keprios stated that they have been delaying the maintenance garage at Courtney fields for several years because it's one that has been easy to put off. However, now they are finding that by putting it off it's costing them money. He noted that there have been several break -ins where the irrigation system panel has been destroyed as well as equipment has been stolen. It makes daily operations less efficient and does not provide adequate security for our equipment. It has been a real problem. Mr. Keprios indicated that obviously the biggest one is the multi - purpose athletic field at Braemar. He noted that in staff's view it's time to do this field and added that this is their premier multi- purpose athletic field. Mr. MacHolda commented that by renovating the field they would have much greater scheduling flexibility. Mr. Keprios pointed out that the renovated fields at Lewis Park have truly withstood the test in that they can take quite a beating and still pop back. He noted that if they were to go with artificial turf it would cost approximately one million dollars and would need to be replaced within ten years. Mr. Keprios indicated that by renovating the fields it would cost approximately $400,000, which is significantly less, and wouldn't need to be replaced in ten years. Therefore, staff's recommendation is to renovate Braemar's athletic field to a premier sand/peat natural grass-athletic field. Mr. Klus explained his concern is he would hate to see the city spend $312,000 when five or six years down the road the Edina Hockey Association may want to expand their arena onto that piece of property. Mr. Keprios replied that it's fair to ask that question and noted that from what Mr. Thayer has told him the Hockey Association has already returned over 300 hours of prime ice time which is primarily weekend ice. He noted that Mr. Thayer also made the statement that the city would never be able to build enough indoor rinks to accommodate the Monday, Tuesday and Thursday need. He commented that Mr. Thayer has to go out and sell 300 prime hours because the demand isn't there for our own programs. Mr. Keprios explained that even if they do develop this and later find out they need to add a fourth rink Mr. Thayer feels that the smartest place to put it is just to extend the west arena building or expand to the west onto the parking lot. Either way it wouldn't encroach at all on the athletic field. He stated that he thinks they could still do both and doesn't think they would be locking themselves out. Mr. Johnson stated that he would agree that the field is not the spot for a fourth rink. Mr. MacHolda indicated that he talked to Steve Dove today and he would agree with this recommendation because as it is now there is not enough green space on the two campuses to accommodate the District's current athletic field needs. Jeff Johnson MOVED TO APPROVE THE 2005 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN. Mike Weiss SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. V. MCCARTHY ATHLETIC FIELD PROPOSAL — GREG ETTINGER, PRESIDENT EDINA FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION Mr. Klus introduced Doug Nessan, Past President of the Edina Football Association and Jon Girard, soon to be president of the Edina Football Association. He indicated that they would like to discuss McCarthy Field with the Park Board. He noted that Mr. Keprios did provide some of the background on McCarthy Park in his staff report. Mr. Klus read the following from Mr. Keprios' staff report " McCarthy athletic field used to be a multi - purpose athletic field that served as a baseball field, football practice field, as well as track and field event uses. As part of the successful referendum projects, the School District has renovated the natural grass area between South View Middle School and Concord Elementary School and developed a varsity level baseball field, which used to be served by the McCarthy field. The old McCarthy athletic field site has been renovated to serve primarily as a natural grass multi - purpose athletic field for football, lacrosse, and track and field. The field is owned and maintained by the Edina School District." Mr. Nessan explained that the Edina Football Association (EFA) used the field between South View and the Community Center for football. However, that has since been taken out. He noted that McCarthy also has a practice site on it and of course there is Kuhlman field. Mr. Nessan commented that what's happened is the South View field has been taken out and the baseball field that was at McCarthy has been moved to the other side which he believes is now called Concord field. Therefore, what they are left with as a space for football is McCarthy at least until they put in the turn- around. Mr. Nessan indicated that for the 9`h grade, sophomore, junior varsity and varsity football they really only have Kuhlman and_ McCarthy as space to use for football. Mr. Nessan stated that Mr. MacHolda and Mr. Dove were kind enough to meet with Greg Ettinger and himself earlier this spring to talk a little bit about McCarthy Field. He noted they were looking into the possibility of perhaps putting in artificial turf on the 100 -yard field at McCarthy. Mr. Nessan commented that it would seem to him that this would be the cheapest time to do this since the crews would already be there working. He noted that their discussion was put aside when the idea of possibly putting in a covered field at upper Braemar progressed; however, it is now his understanding that the idea has been tabled. Mr. Nessan explained that the EFA is interested in seeing if there is an appetite for putting in a turf field on the practice field at McCarthy. He pointed out that this would really benefit the football program in the fall but it would also benefit the soccer and lacrosse programs in the spring and summer. He commented that they would like to know if there is an interest on the city's part to put money toward renovating this field to gain a more fully serviceable and wear resistant field over the next ten years. He noted that by putting in a turf field at McCarthy it could be used for both city and school purposes. Mr. Nessan indicated that they think user fees could support this concept. He suggested that perhaps the city and school would be interested in directing a portion of money towards renovating the field with the balance being paid by user fees. He commented 0 that he just doesn't know in the end how much money could be generated that way. Mr. Nessan pointed out that it's his understanding that the cost of a new turf field would be somewhere between $800,000 and one million dollars. He indicated that since this would be on school property and would be used by the varsity sports during different times of the year couldn't there be allocations of use between school projects and city projects. He stated that they are interested in finding out if there would be any funds available from the city to do something like this. Mr. Keprios asked Mr. Nessan in order for the football program to utilize the fields would there have to be lights to which Mr. Nessan replied no. Mr. Nessan stated that it would be great to have them but for years they've practiced until the sun went down. Mr. Keprios asked, if it didn't have field lighting, then would it still be a big enough benefit to which Mr. Nessan replied that he thinks it would be a big benefit to all of the field using sports in general. Mr. Keprios asked what is the school's need for that field to which Mr. Nessan replied the school runs varsity football there from 3:00 pm to 6:30 pm every night starting in mid - August and ending the last part of October or first part of November. Mr. Keprios stated that with the sun setting earlier in the fall that means the Football Association's primary use is limited to just weekends since there are no lights. Mr. Nessan explained that because the dads coach football they usually start around 5:30 pm to 5:45 pm and it usually gets dark around 6:45 pm to 7:00 pm. Mr. Girard commented that the 7th and 8`h graders were practicing between the Community Center and South View and now that has been removed. He noted that every year they try to work with the city and the school to try and get green space and every spring and fall they run into problems trying to figure out where they can put all of the teams. Mr. Weiss asked what will the Valley View field be used for to which Mr. MacHolda replied it is heavily used for phy -ed classes as well as it is used for the high school soccer program. He noted that he hopes that lacrosse and rugby will also be able to get on those fields in the spring. Mr. MacHolda commented that lacrosse and rugby are always struggling to find green space in the spring. Mr. MacHolda indicated that the question Mr. Keprios raised is a lot of times the spring sports want to start in March but we are telling them the earliest we want them on the fields is mid -April. He noted that if the ground is wet then there is a lot of root damage being done. He stated that is why you'll see lacrosse players in the parking lot throwing the ball or baseball practicing in the gymnasiums. Mr. MacHolda pointed out that artificial turf definitely extends the season and gives you the same quality practice /game venue. Mr. Klus asked Mr. Nessan why McCarthy and not another field within Edina. Mr. Nessan replied that he would pick McCarthy simply from the standpoint that it's a big open space and is the only site he can think of where they can combine both city and school participation. 7 Mr. MacHolda indicated that if the City of Edina were to add another artificial surface he thinks McCarthy would be the best location because it's the High School football program that needs it the most. He noted that the community would benefit from it as well. Mr. MacHolda commented that he has the same concern that Mr. Keprios has in that if the players are stepping on the field at 6:00 pm and there is only daylight until 6:30 pm that is a very small window. He stated that it concerns him a little bit not having lights, however, he does like the fact that they would have an extended season because sports like lacrosse and rugby would also definitely benefit. Dr. Hulbert asked who is using. Kuhlman field when the varsity football team is using McCarthy. Mr. MacHolda replied that soccer is there on Tuesdays and Thursdays as well as the marching band also uses that field for their practice. He then explained that when they say varsity football they are talking 9`h grade, sophomore, junior varsity and varsity. He noted that the 10`h graders through 12`h graders all suit up, for Friday games, however, they break up separately for practices leading up to the varsity. games. Dr. Hulbert asked so having artificial turf on Kuhlman has not been able to take care of all of the scheduling? Mr. MacHolda replied that artificial turf does give a much better playing surface because there are less injuries, they can play in the rain and as soon as one sport is done the next one can go right on and they can get on the field early in the spring. However, if there are four football teams on that postage stamp and there are 8 soccer teams on the -other one -at the High School.-they're short. Mr. Keprios indicated that putting in turf at McCarthy would be great for the community as a whole as well as it philosophically makes sense that the city and school work together on this and each group pays their percentage of the benefit. He noted that it sounds like it would be a huge benefit to the school during the fall season. Mr. Keprios pointed out, however, that he has been told there is no way McCarthy will ever have lights because it is so close to residential homes. He asked what percentage of benefit is it to community use groups compared to what percentage of benefit for school district use. As a matter of priority, is this where we want our money to go versus something like putting it towards a Walnut Ridge Park to make it a more playable field. Mr. Keprios commented that, in his view, the school should play a large role in this financially if they are going to be the primary benefactor. However, he would say that the city should have an interest because it's our job to put our dollars where it benefits our community -based programs. He added that's why they are putting their money towards improving Braemar because during the last three years they focused their money on Lewis Park and upgraded the Courtney ball fields because they serve primarily our community user groups. Mr. Keprios stated that on the converse those are the same fields that significantly benefit the school district and therefore maybe we should ask the school district if they would be willing to help pay for some of those renovations. Mr. MacHolda indicated that really there is a third party, which are the community user groups. He believes there could be private funds raised for this project. Mr. Klus indicated that if he understands correctly Mr. Nessan and Mr. Girard are here tonight to see if the Park Board would have an interest in looking at this project to benefit McCarthy field. He pointed out that he also thinks Mr. Nessan and Mr. Girard will need E:A to work with the other associations /clubs to see if they are willing to help to commit to this project. Mr. Klus stated that they already know that the school is not willing to do anything at this point because the money isn't there. Mr. Nessan asked Mr. Johnson if all of the money has been spent from the referendum to which Mr. Johnson replied it has all been allocated but not spent. Everything that is listed in that referendum is what they plan on doing and if anything is left over it's going back to pay off the bond. Mr. Klus stated that they don't know how much money has been allocated by the school for what's going to be done at McCarthy. Mr. Johnson replied that he will take this back to the school board and look at the figures to see how much money has been allocated to McCarthy Field. He noted that he would see if there is any interest, perhaps through donations, to pursue this and see if there are any funds that could be set -aside for this. Mr. Weiss asked by using a second all- purpose field would it lengthen the life of Kuhhnan because it wouldn't necessarily get used as much. Mr. Johnson replied that he thinks they would use it just as much. Mr. Weiss commented that if that is the case then .there is clearly a need for more artificial turf. He pointed out that, irrigation or not, a regular field after two six -hour days of heavy practice in the heat of August is going to get chewed up. Mr. Weiss stated that he would urge the Park Board to at least partner up with the school to see if there is enough interest. It was also pointed out that the bus takes the kids from Valley View and the High School for baseball and football practices to the community center campus. Mr. Klus stressed to Mr. Nessan and Mr. Girard that he would encourage them to talk to the other associations and see what interest and commitment there is and come back to the Park Board to discuss what that commitment is. He indicated that by doing this it would help the Park Board to have a better direction of what needs to be done. He noted that it sounds like Mr. Johnson is willing to go back to the School Board and find out what the situation is and report back to the Park Board at their December meeting. Mr. Klus suggested to Mr. Nessan and Mr. Girard to do their homework on this and if they would like to report back at the December Park Board meeting to let Mr. Keprios know and he will put it on the agenda. Mr. Keprios asked the Park Board to look at the Capital Improvement Plan between now and next month's meeting and give it a lot of thought as to how could we afford to do our share with this by moving things around in the plan. He noted that there isn't another fund to get money from so it's a matter of choices. Therefore, he encourages the Park Board to look at this and see how they might be able to fit it into their long -range plans. Mr. Klus pointed out that it also depends on how much money they can get from the community for a project like this. He stated that it's very important to see on projects like this not only how much money can be raised by the community but how much can be raised by the associations and clubs. He also indicated that the Edina Foundation could be another source they could look to for help in raising money for things like this. G� Mr. Sorem asked what is the expected life on a turf field that's going to be used heavily to which Mr. Keprios replied a maximum of approximately ten years. VI. PARK ASSIGNMENTS PRESENTATION— KARLA SITEK Ms. Sitek indicated that her park assignments were Rosland Park, Strachauer Park and Yorktown Park. She noted that the first one she visited was Strachauer Park, which is located at 6200 Beard Avenue, formerly named Beard Park, and was renamed after a longtime Park Board Chairman. She noted the park sits on five acres and includes a full - size basketball court, ice hockey rink, warming house, two soccer fields and playground equipment. She pointed out that it has one of the older warming houses but people seem to be content with it. Ms. Sitek indicated that parking is really the only negative thing that was mentioned because it goes all the way around the block. However, the neighborhood uses this park a lot. Ms. Sitek noted that the next park she visited was Rosland Park, formerly named Lake Cornelia Park, which was renamed after former Park Director and City Manager Ken Rosland. She stated that it is located at 4600 West 66`h Street and sits on 22 acres. Ms. Sitek pointed out that the park includes the Edina Aquatic Center as well as the Edina Art Center. She noted that the park has playground equipment, two tennis courts, a baseball fields sand volleyball and a fishing pier. She pointed out there is also: a gazebo, grills and a Frisbee golf course. She pointed out that the Frisbee Golf Course was also part of an Eagle Scout project. Ms. Sitek stated that the parking lot is pretty sufficient now that they have redone it. She noted that the gazebo is rented out all of the time and commented.that the drinking fountain does work. She-indicated that the bathrooms are great because they are always open unlike some of the other parks. Mr. Keprios replied that Rosland Park is on the keyless entry system and that's why they are always open during the daytime hours. He noted that soon they would be adding Bredesen Park, Pamela Park and Normandale Park into their keyless entry system. Ms. Sitek added that the Frisbee Golf Course is the best thing for the teenagers, there are always kids using it. She commented that she has never seen anyone use the sand volleyball court to which Mr. Keprios replied that it does get pretty minimal, use. Mr. Keprios noted that Mr. MacHolda has made a great suggestion of perhaps of converting that area for a different use, it's a very valuable space for the few times it's used. Ms. Sitek commented that there is a wonderful walking path and one complaint she received was that the exercise equipment stations that are there are very old and falling apart. Mr. Keprios replied that they would look at removing those. Ms. Sitek indicated that the last park she visited was Yorktown Park, which sits on 2 acres and is located at 73�d Street and York Avenue. She explained that the YMCA Tri- City Skate Park is located within Yorktown Park. The cities of Bloomington, Richfield and Edina along with the YMCA woiked together to make this park possible. Ms. Sitek mentioned that they still desperately need to build a permanent building for bathrooms, storage, concessions and safety gear. She commented that there also is no shade for the spectators so it would be nice to build something for them as well. Mr. Keprios replied that both the Edina Park Board and Edina City Council have approved money. for Edina's 1111 share of the permanent building. However, the joint powers agreements state that each of the other communities and the YMCA will work together to make future capital improvements. Neither Richfield nor Bloomington has the money at this time to do it. Mr. Johnson asked if there have been any major injuries at the skate park to which Ms. Sitek replied there hasn't been one and there are kids of all ages using the skate park. Ms. Sitek also added that the staff at the YMCA is awesome. VII. OTHER A. Slide Presentation — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that he took some photos today of the projects they have been working on this year and are trying to wrap up. Mr. Keprios gave a brief slide presentation that showed the following renovations and park improvements; Lewis Park parking lot, Lewis Park west athletic field, Lewis Park tennis courts, Art Center roof, Grange Hall and Cahill School buildings siding and windows, and Arneson Acres Park sidewalk and entrance. B. Buckthorn at Braemar - Mr. Weiss noted that he has been asked by a few people in his neighborhood to see how they can accelerate the buckthorn removal at Braemar, particularly on Gleason going up that hill. He stated that apparently it's an Oak Savannah. Mr. Weiss indicated that the neighborhood group would provide the majority of the labor. Mr. Klus informed Mr. Weiss that he should contact the City Forester, Tom Horwath, to see what kind of help he would be able to provide the neighborhood. Mr. Klus added that they want to make sure they do it correctly otherwise they will just create a bigger problem. C. Signage - Mr. Sorem asked Mr. Keprios if a sign could be put up at Pamela just like that one that is at Lewis stating that the park can be used by permit only. He commented that there are a lot of athletic events going on and he's pretty sure they aren't Edina residents. Mr. Keprios replied that he would gladly get similar signs placed at Pamela. Mr. Keprios also stated that he hates to suggest this but some day we should consider putting a fence around that field. He commented that the Pamela Park large athletic field gets a lot of unauthorized non - resident use. D. Hiking Trails at Golf Dome — Dr. Hulbert asked if there is still public access to the hiking trails across from the golf dome since that area has been fenced, can people still hike there? Mr. Keprios replied that's a good question to which he doesn't have an answer but will look into it. VIII. ADJOURNMENT Mike Weiss MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 8:50 PM. Alice Hulbert SECONDED THE MOTION. MEETING ADJOURNED. 11 MINUTES DECEMBER 15, 2004 EDINA RECYCLING AND SOLID WASTE COMMISSION COMMUNITY CONFERENCE ROOM MEMBERS PRESENT: Kathy Frey, Bill Bryan, Inna Hays, and Anne Cronin MEMBERS ABSENT: Tim Brownell GUEST: Rich Hirstein, BFI Residential Sales Manager STAFF PRESENT: Solvei Wilmot, Recycling Coordinator ROLL CALL Kathy Frey, Chair, called the meeting to order at 7:05 a.m. MINUTES Mr. Bryan MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FROM THE OCTOBER 20, 2004 MEETING. Ms. Hays SECONDED. MOTION CARRIED. HAZARDOUS WASTE Ms. Wilmot reported that a state law would be going into effect July 1, 2005, which will make it illegal for residents to throw their cathode ray tube (computer monitors) and TV's into the trash. Ms. Wilmot will work on getting information out to the residents. In addition, Ms. Wilmot will address proper disposal of florescent light bulbs. RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING FUNDING POLICY Ms. Wilmot distributed copies of Hennepin Counties 2005 — 2007 funding policy. The new policy did not have any changes to the way grant money would be distributed to the cities within Hennepin County. It does add the requirement for boxboard to be collected. However, Edina is already collecting that material in the curbside program. CLEAN CITY Ms. Wilmot commented that the City of Minneapolis is starting a "Clean City" promotion and was encouraging surrounding communities to do the same. Mr. Bryan stated that he has taken pictures of items that have been dumped in the city parks. Ms. Wilmot commented that she would look into getting an article in the About Town regarding a clean city and include donation locations, reuse suggestions and numbers for disposal options. OTHER BUSINESS Mr. Hirstein commented that BFI is planning to be able to offer single sort recycling collection. Commission members expressed concern about the quality of the items collected. Mr. Hirstein commented that the consumer's request is driving this change. However, the current Edina contract with the commodities being sorted would continue. ADJOURN Meeting adjourned 8:00 a.m. City of Edina February 10, 2005 Bill Larson 5416 Grove Street Edina, MN 55436 Dear Mr. Larson: Thank you for your letter of February 8, 2005, concerning residential subdivisions in Edina. The City Council will be considering its policies and' ordinances with respect to subdivisions over the course of the next several months. I am sure they will take your views into consideration during that process. Thanks for taking the time to share your thoughts with us. Sincerely, Gordon L. Hughes City Manager GLH /dw i CC: Mayor and Council , .../ City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD TUESDAY, DECEMBER 14, 2004, AT 7:00 P.M. EDINA CITY HALL — MAYOR'S CONFERENCE ROOM 4801 WEST 50TH STREET MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Gary Nyberg, Bob Kojetin, Peggy Jennings, Herman Ratelle, Ann Swenson, and Marie Thorpe MEMBERS ABSENT: Bill Crawford, Don Wray and Consultant Robert Vogel STAFF PRESENT: Joyce Repya, Associate Planner I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: Member Ratelle moved for approval of the minutes from the November 9, 2004 meeting. Member Swenson seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. II. HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN OUTLINE: Vision Planner Repya reminded the Board that they had scheduled working on the "Vision" section of the Preservation Plan for the December meeting. In preparation, Consultant Vogel prepared an outline, providing bullet points to spur discussion. In a memo to the Board, Mr. Vogel pointed out that the "Vision" section of the comprehensive preservation plan should focus on future planning needs. A relatively simple way to do this is to identify "outcomes" and "benchmarks" that would allow future city policy makers to evaluate the success of the preservation program. He then provided the following list of statements that reflect broad policy goals the Board has identified in the past: In 2020, the city historic preservation program will be characterized by the following program achievements (outcomes): 1. Edina will be a distinctive and recognizable community where preserved historic buildings and sites provide physical links to the past and foster a sense of community identity. 2. Historically significant buildings, sites, structures, objects and districts will be preserved as functional, useful parts of the modern city and will be the Minutes — December 14, 2004 Edina Heritage Preservation Board focus of important education, edification, recreation, and economic development activities. 3. The city will provide historic property owners and neighborhood groups with technical assistance and education in historic preservation. 4. Historic preservation programs sponsored by the city will stress empowerment of individuals and communities through stewardship, advocacy, education and partnership. By the year 2020, the city historic preservation program will have reached the following benchmarks: 1. Identified and evaluated all buildings more than 40 years old to determine their heritage landmark eligibility. 2. Surveyed the Morningside, Browndale Park, West Minneapolis Heights, Minnehaha Creek and Southdale neighborhoods to determine their historic preservation potential. 3. Re- surveyed the Edina Country Club District to refine and update the 1980 survey data. 4. Reviewed and updated each Heritage Landmark plan of treatment every ten years. 5. Carried out archaeological surveys of all undeveloped lands within the city limits. 6. Developed and implemented effective, voluntary, non - regulatory approaches to preserving significant historic properties. 7. Fully integrated historic preservation with other city planning for parks, recreation, community development, public safety, public works and education. 8. Developed historic property interpretation programs for selected heritage landmarks in partnership with property owners and outside agencies. 9. Made all pertinent information on preserved heritage landmarks accessible to the general public. 10. Made local history and heritage preservation a vital part of K -12 school curricula and lifelong learning for Edina residents. Addressing the four "outcome" points that Mr. Vogel identified, Member Jennings observed that she really liked point 1., however thought it might be clearer if broken-down into two sentences to read, "Edina, as a distinctive and recognizable community, will preserve historic buildings and sites. The city will provide physical links to the past and foster a sense of community identity." Member Thorpe agreed with Mrs. Jennings, pointing out that she thought this point was very important and could easily be part of an opening paragraph for the "Vision" section of the plan. Board members agreed with Mrs. Thorpe and indicated that they agreed with the three remaining points in the "outcome" section. O"A Minutes — December 14, 2004 Edina Heritage Preservation Board When looking at the ten "benchmark" points, the following suggestions were made: Benchmark 1. Member Thorpe questioned the requirement to identify and evaluate all buildings more than 40 years old. She pointed out that by 2020, that would be anything built before 1980, which would encompass practically the entire city — quite an undertaking. Chairman Nyberg agreed with Mrs. Thorpe and indicated that he would like to have Mr. Vogel further explain his intent for that requirement. Benchmark 2. Member Swenson questioned identifying specific neighborhoods for surveys — pointing out that she would prefer not mentioning specific neighborhoods, leaving the options more open and less exclusive. Board members agreed. Benchmark 5. Member Swenson questioned why archaeological surveys would be carried out for all undeveloped lands within the city limits — asking, if a site is privately owned, can an archaeological survey be required of the owner? Discussion ensued among the Board. All agreed they would like to discuss this point with Mr. Vogel. Benchmark 6. Board members questioned whether the words voluntary and non - regulatory should be used when referring to the approaches the city should take when preserving significant historic properties. Board members agreed that they would like to discuss the choice of words with Mr. Vogel Benchmark 7. Member Swenson pointed out that she really liked this point which provides for fully integrating historic preservation with other city planning for parks, recreation, community development, public safety, public works and education, however she would like to see it as one of the first benchmarks, not #7. Board members agreed. Benchmark 9. Member Kojetin stated that he thought it was important that all pertinent information on preserved heritage landmarks be accessible to the general public. He asked if the Edina Historical Society isn't already doing that. Planner Repya pointed out that while the Historical Society currently houses most of the historical information for the city in its files; by 2020 information from both the Historical Society and the Heritage Preservation Board should be available to the public via the internet, or whatever technology is current at that time. Benchmark 10. Board members pointed out that they liked this point, which makes local history and heritage preservation available in the K -12 curricula as well as for all residents. Member Jennings stated that she felt local history is best suited for students in middle school, to be used as an enrichment component. Board members agreed. K Minutes — December 14, 2004 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Following a brief discussion, Member Jennings stated that she felt these points were a great starting point for discussion. Member Ratelle agreed, but pointed out that it is important for Mr. Vogel to be a part of the discussion because so many questions have been raised regarding his intentions with some of the word choices. All Board members agreed. Mr. Ratelle than moved to table further discussions regarding the "Vision" until the January meeting when Mr. Vogel can provide his input. Member Swenson seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. III. DESIGN REVIEW GUIDELINES FOR GARAGES IN THE COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT: Planner Repya reminded the Board that this item 'was carried over from the November meeting to include changes the Board proposed. Mr. Vogel provided the Board with a memo in which he indicated that by ordinance, a Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior to issuance of a building permit to construct a new detached garage in'the Edina Country Club District. The Country Club District Plan of Treatment, adopted in 2003 included design guidelines for new home construction but not garages; the following document was developed as an appendix to the district plan of treatment. In reviewing applications for Certificates of Appropriateness for new, detached garages in the Country Club District, the Heritage Preservation Board will apply the following guidelines: No detached garage should be taller, longer or wider than the house on the same lot. No new, detached garage should have a roofline taller than that of the adjacent homes. Undecorated sidewalls longer than 16 feet should be avoided whenever possible. New detached garages should be differentiated from historic homes and clearly identifiable as contemporary works. Board members agreed with the first three points of the guidelines, but questioned 'the last point. Member Swenson pointed out that when the homes were first built in the Country Club District, detached garages were not that prevalent; and those that were built were smaller, quite utilitarian in design and for the most part, not visible from the front street. In this day and age, detached garages are much larger, often visible from the front street. Homeowners are spending a lot of money on these detached structures, which they are hoping to replicate the design of their home. Board members agreed that is the trend they are seeing. Chairman Nyberg questioned the use of the term "contemporary works ". Although that term is often used in heritage preservation circles to refer to "current" or "up -to- date" structures, 4 s Minutes — December 14, 2004 Edina Heritage Preservation Board often the public sees "contemporary" as an architectural style. Board members agreed that the guidelines should be "user friendly" with a careful use of technical jargon. After a brief discussion, the Board agreed on the following revised language for the last point: "New detached garages should be differentiated, but compatible with historic homes." Member Swenson stated that she was pleased with the proposed appendix to the guidelines, and moved for approval as proposed, with the exception of the last point, which should reflect the change agreed to by the Board. Member Kojetin seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. Mrs. Swenson then asked that after the Board has reviewed another year of detached garages, these guidelines be reviewed to see if they need to be adjusted. The Board agreed that would be a good idea. IV. PRESERVATION WEEK PLANNING — May 2005 Due to Consultant Vogel's absence, the Board agreed to table this item until the January meeting. V. OTHER BUSINESS: 1. Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) Correspondence Planner Repya provided the Board with copies of a letter addressed to Mr. Dennis Gimmestad, the Government Programs and Compliance Officer with the Minnesota Historical Society from the Design Project Manager of MNDOT, Heather Lott. As attachments to the letter, Ms. Lott provided photographs of a typical wall attached to bridge railings along with a structural design of the wall. She indicated that the bridge is in the final design phase and invited Mr. Gimmestad to contact her with comments or concerns. Board members discussed the photographs and agreed the design looked very plain, as though no concessions were made for the historic neighborhood and creek. All agreed that the examples provided were for bridges over highways, which is very different from a scenic waterway such as Minnehaha Creek. Planner Repya offered to pass the Board's comments to Mr. Gimmestad, and indicated that she would keep them posted on the project as new information is available. No formal action was taken. 5 Minutes — December 14, 2004 Edina Heritage Preservation Board 2. New HPB Member from Planning Commission Member Swenson explained that this would be her last meeting, not only because her second, one -year term is up, but also because she is moving on to her position as ,a Council Member. David Runyan, a Planning Commission member for well over 25 years will be replacing Mrs. Swenson. Mr. Runyan is a retired architect, who Mrs. Swenson said would be an asset to the HPB. Board members expressed their delight for'Mrs. Swenson as she moves on to her position as a Council Member, and thanked her for the excellent service she provided the Board as the first representative from the Planning Commission. Board members then stated that they looked - forward to welcoming Mr. Runyan to their ranks. No formal action was taken. 3. Potential 50th & France Redevelopment Member Thorpe stated that she has received several comments from people who are aware of a potential redevelopment project at the 50th & France area. The area involved includes the building south of W. 50th Street, from the theater east to France Avenue and from that corner, south, to include the Arby's parcel. The word on the street is that a redevelopment is in the works that would include retail on the street level and residential on the upper levels, not unlike new developments in downtown Hopkins and Excelsior & Grand. Mrs. Thorpe explained that the individuals who have approached her are concerned that 50th & France area will be changed to the point that it might lose it's historic charm; and they are wondering if the Heritage. Preservation Board will have any input in the development of the project. Planner Repya explained that because the 50th and France Commercial area does not have Edina Heritage Landmark status, the Heritage Preservation Board would not have a required review. However, the Planning Commission or the City Council could ask for the HPB opinion on the project. Board members briefly discussed the potential project. No formal action was taken. 4. Edina Theater Sign — Update Planner Repya explained that she and Robert Vogel met with the owner of the theater building, Gene Haugland to discuss the possible Edina Heritage Landmark designation for the theater sign. Mr. Haugland expressed concerns regarding the landmark designation, citing the negative experiences he has had with the Minneapolis'Heritage Preservation Commission. In response, Ms. Repya and Mr. Vogel explained how Edina's Heritage Preservation Ordinance is unique in that the property owner is a team player with the Heritage Preservation Board, creating together a plan of treatment that best suits the property. Mr. Haugland asked what the timeline would be for the designation. He was advised that the first week of May Minutes — December 14, 2004 Edina Heritage Preservation Board 2005, during Preservation Week would be the target date. Mr. Haugland left the meeting with copies of the preservation ordinance as well as a draft plan of treatment for the sign. He indicated that he would get back to Ms. Repya with his ideas about the designation sometime after the first of the year. A brief discussion among Board members followed. No formal action was taken. 5. Board Member Herman Ratelle Resigns Member Ratelle advised the Board that this would be his last meeting. He explained that his term was up for reappointment and he found his work commitments had reached a point that he was spread too thin. Board members shared their regrets that Mr. Ratelle would leaving, thanked him for his years of service and wished him the best in the future. VI. NEXT MEETING DATE: January 11, 2005 VII. ADJOURNMENT: 7:55 P.M. Respectfully submitted, �1 4;�oyyce �Reppyya 7 About the City Situated immediately southwest of Minneapolis, Edina has a population of more than 47,000. Minnesota Highways 62 and 100 divide the City into four sections. Interstate Highway 494 forms the south boundary and U.S. Highway 169 forms the west boundary of the City. Edina is part of Hennepin County. Our major employers include: Jerry's Enterprises Inc. Nash Finch Co. Marshall Field's Edina Public Schools Fairview Southdale Hospital International Dairy Queen J.C. Penney Co. Edina Realty ConAgra Foods A sound public infrastructure encourages the development of a stable private infrastructure, leading to an enhance- ment of the sense of quality that Edina has and will enjoy. A Balance of Land Uses Edina is a model of urban development: a diversity of land uses, housing choices for all stages of a person's life, outstanding neighborhoods and an extensive network of parks and open spaces all arranged in a manner of development that is pedestrian- and transit - friendly. It also includes the employment of reinvestment and redevelopment strategies to address • • changing housing and business needs and prudent policies that sustain Edina's enormous investment in its housing stock and neighborhoods. IMPORTANT TELEPHONE NUMBERS FOR EMPLOYEES City of Edina Human Resources City of Edina Payroll 952 - 826 -0404 952 - 826 -0418 (f) 952 - 826 -0390 (f) 952 - 826 -0390 Acclaim Benefits 763 - 278 -4312 800 - 333 -3724 (f) 763- 278 -4004 (f) 866 - 278 -4004 Medica Employee 952 - 992 -2900 (f) 952 - 992 -3199 Group Numbers High 30028 Elect 30228 V Essentials 30528 Low MIC 1000 30128 Prudential Life Insurance Customer Service 800 - 524 -0542 (f) 800 - 778 -4797 Group Number 96234 PERA Employee 651- 296 -7460 ID 4410 -00 Fortis Long -term Disability 800 - 745 -7100 (f) 315 - 453 -0796 Fortis (Assurant) Dental 800 - 866 -5020 Group Number J244 City of Edina Network Support 952 - 826 -0436 (f) 952 - 826 -0390 711 Ir The City's Mission -� and Vision Our Mission The mission of the City of Edina is to provide effective H and valued public services, maintain a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities and guide the development and redevelopment of lands within the City, all in a manner which sustains and improves the uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses. Our Vision For 2020 Edina will be the preeminent place for living, learning, raising families and doing business distinguished by: A Livable Environment Our residents regard their quality of life in Edina as very high. Many factors contribute to this opinion, including premier schools, exceptional neighborhoods, an advantageous location in the metropolitan area, excellent public facilities and services, safe streets, a clean and adequate water supply, access to new technology and communications systems and a strong sense of community identity. Effective and Valued City Services Our customers (we view our residents and businesses as customers as well as taxpayers) have an extraordinarily high regard for City services. They associate an outstanding value with these services. They also distinguish Edina from other places by the quality of our services. These services change as the needs of our customers change, but their effectiveness and value will be the benchmarks of our success. A Sound Public Infrastructure Edina streets, utilities, parks and public buildings are the essential components of the foundation of our City. • Edina has numerous retail shopping centers, including Southdale Center, the first climate-controlled, fully enclosed mall in the United States. Other shopping centers include Galleria, Yorktown and Centennial Lakes Plaza. The City also boasts a thriving downtown area at 50th Street and France Avenue. Edina values its history. The Beard and Grimes homes and Country Club District area are listed on the National • Register of Historic Places. The Grange Hall and Cahill School, owned by the City and located across from City Hall in Tupa Park, are also on the Register. The Beard Home is located at 4400 W. 50th St. and the Grimes home is located at 4200 W. 44th St. About Edina's Government The City of Edina operates under a 'Plan B" council - manager plan of government. The City Council comprises a Mayor and four Council members. Each serves a four -year term. The City Council, elected at -large on a non - partisan basis, determines all matters of policy and appoints the City Manager. The City Manager is responsible for implementing policies and carrying out the business of City government, including the selection of new employees. City services are provided by a staff that includes more • than 250 regular full -time employees, 90 regular part -time employees and several hundred seasonal workers (mostly in Park and Recreation programs). £DINq E' `1 The staff is assisted by many volunteers. The hub of local goverment is Edina City Hall. A new City Hall opened in 2004 and features a state -of- the -art Council Chambers and dispatch center, among other things. recreation system are Braemar Golf Course, Centennial Lakes Park, Edinborough Park and Rosland Park. The customer service - oriented City is divided into the Braemar Golf Course has a 27 -hole regulation course, a following departments and offices: nine -hole executive course, a pro shop, a driving range, a practice putting green, indoor golf dome and banquet Administration and meeting rooms. The Office of the City Manager is responsible for • • A 24 -acre park and pond area, Centennial Lakes Park executing the policies adopted by the City Council. offers the ultimate urban escape. The park features The City Manager's office provides for the general more than 1.5 miles of paved pedestrian pathway management of the City and is responsible for around a 10 -acre lake, putting course, lawn personnel, compensation and benefits administration, games area, amphitheater, paddle boats, labor relations, risk management, long -range planning, swinging benches, fountains and banquet and maintenance of official records, licensing, policy research meeting rooms. and implementation, human relations, elections, staffing of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, employee With more than 6,000 plants, trees and flowers, training and career development, management of Edinborough Park offers the perfect setting for a City facilities, computer network support and variety of cultural, recreational and athletic activities. communications. The completely enclosed one -acre park features a junior Olympic -sized swimming pool, running track Planning and exercise area, and the largest indoor play The Planning Department is responsible for community structure in the Midwest, Adventure Peak. planning, the development and maintenance of the , Rosland Park is home to the Edina Aquatic Center Comprehensive Land Use Plan, administration of the and Edina Art Center. The Edina Aquatic Center has a zoning ordinance, sign ordinance, subdivision ordinance, zero-depth children's pool with play structure and metropolitan rental assistance and the federal Community Development Block Grant Program. • enclosed slide and a main pool with 215 -foot twisting flume. Rosland Park also has official baseball fields r- T, and tennis courts. Wage or salary is paid bi- weekly. Pay periods end on Tuesday with checks for that pay period being issued on the following Friday. The City has two employee recognition programs to honor those that go above and beyond in their work. The Administration Department also hosts an annual Employee Appreciation Luncheon, usually held during the summer. Amenities The City offers several scenic paths for bicycling, walking, jogging, cross - country skiing and snowshoeing. Parkland and open space totals 1,552 acres. The City features 39 public parks, four open space areas and several walking and bicycling paths. Among the highlights of the park and 1' Finance The Finance Department provides accounting and f internal auditing services for all City departments. Finance administers payroll and some related personnel activities. This department is responsible for revenue collections, disbursements and investments, preparation of the annual budget and financial statements of the City. • • Assessing The Assessing Department is responsible for equitable distribution of the ad valorem property tax on Edina's approximately 20,000 real estate parcels. Periodic appraisals and their defense, along with administration of the State's property tax classification system, are elements of that function. Special assessments for City improvements are also administered by this department. Public Works The Public Works Department maintains all City buildings, water, sewer and storm water facilities, streets, sidewalks and other projects. The Department is divided into engineering, street maintenance, utility maintenance and equipment maintenance. Police • • The Police Department enforces federal, state and local laws. The department is also responsible for responding to medical emergencies, fires, accidents, animal control, thefts, damage to property, suspicious people and vehicles, alarm responses and crime prevention and education. The Department also administers the emergency preparedness program. 'y Finance The City's general fund annual budget is nearly $25 million. However, the City is a $50 million per year operation. The City's entrepreneurial activities generate about $25 million each year. The enterprises, meant to break even or generate revenue, include three Edina Liquor stores, utilities (sewer and water), Braemar Golf Course, Fred Richards Executive Golf Course, Braemar `. Arena, Braemar Golf Dome, Edina Art Center, Edina Aquatic Center and Centennial Lakes /Ed in borough Parks. The Edina City Council is a careful steward of the City's financial resources. Edina has a Aaa bond rating from Moody's Investors Service and a AAA from Standard and Poor's. Edina is just one of a handful of Minnesota cities to have the top rating from both agencies. Amenities The City offers several scenic paths for bicycling, walking, jogging, cross - country skiing and snowshoeing. Parkland and open space totals 1,552 acres. The City features 39 public parks, four open space areas and several walking and bicycling paths. Among the highlights of the park and 1' Finance The Finance Department provides accounting and f internal auditing services for all City departments. Finance administers payroll and some related personnel activities. This department is responsible for revenue collections, disbursements and investments, preparation of the annual budget and financial statements of the City. • • Assessing The Assessing Department is responsible for equitable distribution of the ad valorem property tax on Edina's approximately 20,000 real estate parcels. Periodic appraisals and their defense, along with administration of the State's property tax classification system, are elements of that function. Special assessments for City improvements are also administered by this department. Public Works The Public Works Department maintains all City buildings, water, sewer and storm water facilities, streets, sidewalks and other projects. The Department is divided into engineering, street maintenance, utility maintenance and equipment maintenance. Police • • The Police Department enforces federal, state and local laws. The department is also responsible for responding to medical emergencies, fires, accidents, animal control, thefts, damage to property, suspicious people and vehicles, alarm responses and crime prevention and education. The Department also administers the emergency preparedness program. 'y PA I rte^ ® LIgUOY The City operates three off -sale liquor stores. The revenues from the operation go into the general fund to help fund the Park and Recreation program. Fire The City maintains a department of full -time paramedics and firefighters who are supplemented by volunteers. The Fire Department is responsible for extinguishing fires, providing paramedic advanced life support medical service, fire prevention and the maintenance of firefighting equipment and fire department facilities., There are two fire stations. In addition, the Department enforces laws and ordinances pertaining to fire safety. Health The Health Department inspects food establishments and public swimming pools, investigates food borne illness reports, nuisance complaints and housing code violations and responds to concerns about the Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act. Building Inspections The Building Inspections Department issues building permits and makes inspections of construction and remodeling done in the City. The department is responsible for the enforcement of the building code. Park and Recreation The Park and Recreation Department oversees and maintains 39 public parks and open spaces and provides programs and athletics for seniors, adults and youth. The Park Department also operates an Aquatic Center, Art Center, Senior Center, ice arena and golf dome and golf courses. • Benefits City employees enjoy an atmosphere of teamwork and support. Employees are offered direct deposit, savings programs, deferred compensation, a cafeteria plan from which to chose group health and dental insurance and a • pension program. Other benefits include ongoing training and education, vacation and sick leave, at least 10 paid holidays and employee assistance, among other things. All public employees are currently mandated by the State to participate in the Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA). Of an employee's gross wage or salary, 5.1 percent is matched with a 5.53 percent contribution from the City. PERA plus Social Security benefits make up the coordinated retirement program. Police and Fire employees are mandated to participate in PERA at a rate of 6.2 percent of their gross wage or salary, matched by a 9.3 percent contribution by the City. All permanent full -time employees are subject to a probationary period of one year, except Public Works employees whose probationary period is six months. Although new employees are accruing vacation and sick leave, they are not eligible to use it until • completion of six months of employment. Should an employee need to be absent from work during the first six months of employment, the time is taken without pay. F a r 1° I i February 3, 2005 Mr. Ron Elmquist 6100 Kellogg Avenue Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Elmquist: City of Edina The. City received your application for appointment to the City. Council on February 1, 2005. As you know, applications for appointment to this position closed at 4:30 P.M. on Thursday, January 27, 2005. The City Clerk explained to me that she received a telephone call from you on Friday, January 28, 2005, at which time you indicated your intent to apply for the vacant position in a timely fashion, however, you were unable to file an application electronically via the City. s website. I presented your application to the City Council at their regular meeting on February 1, 2005, and explained the circumstances as described above. -After discussing -the situation, the City Council decided not to accept your application on the basis that it was not filed with the City prior to the application deadline. The Council believed that it would be unfair to the sixteen candidates who filed their applications prior to the deadline. Sincerely, Gordon L. Hughes City Manager GLH /dw cc: Mayor and Council City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com 952- 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952- 826 -0379 �r. February 8, 2005 Mayor James Hovland Council Member Scot Housh Council Member Linda Masica Council Member Ann Swenson Dear Mayor and Council Members, I was disappointed to hear of your decision to not include my application with the others received for the open seat on the council. I read about this open seat in the January a edition of the Edina Sun Current and thought about this for several weeks before deciding to apply. There was no application due date included in the January Oh story. Delivery of the Sun Current is not very reliable in my neighborhood and I never saw any follow up stories on the application process. I was out of town with work during the week of the 20 and attempted to submit my application while traveling several times during that week on a computer that I was unfamiliar with and was unsuccessful. When I returned home on the evening of the 27th, the online application had already been removed so I could not apply. I left a message for Deb Mangen and the next morning she agreed. to email me a copy which I did not get until after 4:30 that day. I filled this out and delivered it directly to City Hall. I've had several friends and neighbors approach me to comment on this application mix -up. I've been told, "That's just not fair". Maybe I should have included a note or attended your meeting when you discussed this so I could have explained my situation. Would this have changed your decision? If you are aware of an interested applicant's problem in applying shouldn't you try to understand the story before making a decision about'not including them? I understand that you were just trying to be fair to all involved. Because I am an interested applicant, I did try to apply several times before the deadline, and the deadline date and time were not included on the application form that I printed out, I along with others do not agree with your decision. Sincerely, Ron Elmquist 6100 Kellogg Avenue Edina MN 55424 952- 929 -3635 Minneapolis City of Lakes City Council Dean Zimmermann Council Member, Sixth Ward 350 South 5th Street - Room 307 Minneapolis MN 55415 -1383 Office 612 673.2206 Fax 612 673 -3940 TTY 612 673.2157 February 11, 2005 The Honorable Mayor And Council Members of Edina C/o Edina City Clerk 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Re: Application for appointment to Edina City Council Dear Mayor and Council Members: I am pleased to recommend Mr. Ralph Overholt, Esq. in his application for appointment to Edina City Council. Here at the City of Minneapolis, I serve as the City Council Member representing the Sixth Ward. As a Council Member, I establish policy through the support of our community from a variety of committees. I have had the pleasure of numerous conversations with Ralph over lunches during the days he sits as a Conciliation Court Judge. He can bring an enlightened energetic voice to meetings with a critical approach to integrating his academic and professional interests. I have known Mr. Overholt over the last several years. I believe he possesses the ability to listen and synthesize citizen input to formulate policy. He already possesses a juris doctor degree, and I find his interest in acquiring the skills needed for public leadership to be most refreshing. He would make a fine addition to the Edina City Council. Sincerely, l Dean Zimmermann Council Member, Sixth Ward www.ci.minneapolis.mn.us Affirmative Action Employer Lpaahara Carlson 4811 Weadwook Lane J1em6A, Minnesota 55436 -f- The Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers of Edina c o City Clerk City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor and Councilmembers: I am pleased to recommend Mr. Ralph Overholt, Esq. in his application. for appointment to Edina City Council. While I was a councilwoman for the City of Minneapolis, I undertook a great many stands to establish City policy. Mr. Overholt will be an equally great voice to your meetings and possesses an exceptional combination of talents. I have no reservation in recommending his appointment to the Edina City Council. Please contact me if I can provide you with additional information. rel Barbara Carlson James Hovland, Mayor Scot Housh, Council Member Linda Masica, Council Member Ann Swenson, Council Member City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 I support the application of Ralph Overholt for appointment to Edina City Council because: • He represents Edina through his connections with our church, school, civic and athletic institutions. • He will be a positive force for the City by finding opportunities instead of problems. • Finally, he will help insure we get satisfaction for our government services by listening and advocating on our behalf. Thank you for your support, time and courtesy. Very truly yours, e.n Y K. GJa ((e., - Fn`�d•.w., (Name) (Address) td' h " A MN SSK39 (City, State & Zip Code) 7 Sol -'?Yd- 4S 73 (Telephone) Prow 4q 7& ck- L, e7l, lie LMC o%1Ni Cam. Ciro. p uma.'w amaanmrao February 10, 2005 Wayne Houle, City Engineer City of Edina 4801 W 50'h Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Houle: League of Minnesota Cities 145 University Avenue West, St Paul, MN 55103 -2044 (651) 281 -1200 • (800) 925 -1122 Fax: (651) 281 -1299 • TDD: (651) 281 -1290 www.imnc.org Thank you for taking time from your busy schedule to support city - friendly legislation. It is through supportive grassroots efforts like yours that our state and federal legislators will gain an improved understanding and appreciation of the services and solutions found daily in City Halls across the state. While HF 313, the League sponsored street utility authority bill, was tabled by the House Transportation Finance Committee yesterday, the positive presentation and lobbying by city officials like you has placed this legislation in a good position for further consideration. Despite the vigorous attempts of some in the business community who oppose this legislation, your efforts have resulted in the continued optimism that cities will gain authority to make local decisions on whether or not to fund road maintenance through a street utility. The League of Minnesota Cities thanks you for engaging in this grassroots effort to contact your state legislators seeking city - friendly legislative outcomes that benefit a shared constituency. Sincerely, 9b 4 1'4�' Brian D. Strub Policy Coordinator League of Minnesota Cities 0 h� Ok felf1i 0� ?1411 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER Page 1 of 1 Darlene Wallin From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2005 7:44 PM To: Darlene Wallin Subject: FW: T.H. 100 - Please forward this to Mayor Hovland and the City Council. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: John Hanson [mailto:JohnPHanson @mn.rr.com] Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2005 5:37 PM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: T.H. 100 - Please.forward this to Mayor Hovland and the City Council. Dear Mayor and Council Members: I urge you to find a way to move up the Minnesota Department of Transportation's schedule for removing the bottleneck on Highway 100. Nine more years of being stuck in traffic congestion is too long to wait. Please do something. Sincerely, John Hanson 2/14/2005 Gordon Hughes City Manager City of Edina 4801 50th Street West Edina, MN 55424 Dear Gordon. 612.340.7400 fag: 612.340.7675 www unitedwaytwincitieS.org EAST OFFICE 166 Fourth Street Fast Suite 100 Saint Paul, MN 55101 -1448 WEST OFFICE 404 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55404 -1084 Thank you for supporting United Way this year. Your organization's generosity exemplifies your commitment to helping improve the lives of so many in our community. We expect to announce the final campaign total to the community in the first quarter of 2005. Your United Way staff contact will continue to give you updates about our progress toward the community goal, as well as report back to you once the community campaign is finalized. As you know, success in the United Way campaign is directly related to the hard work of your staff. Please commend Susan Heiberg for helping to manage your campaign. Susan worked extremely hard to create a successful campaign - -- certainly indispensable to our efforts and a real asset to your organization. Again, thank you for your leadership and generosity. I hope you are proud of what City of Edina has done to keep our community strong and healthy. Since ely, Gt,L�i�hci �. Lauren A. Segal President & CEO Greater Twin Cities United Way cc: Susan Heiberg, Campaign Coordinator Gloria Winans, Greater Twin Cities United Way It .-Ow. Serving Anoka, Carver, Chisago, Dakota, Hennepin, Isanti, Ramsey, Scott and Washington Counties e i ` ` Iv I ♦ 4 }} )V � 1 .a� s � Y 'yy i 4/W f • � • • .• �. a �`� +� • • • • • s s • � v 1r • � Ilk tA • 0 ow 0 j U!Jovg �_ mar- es �e � [Ayr v ommY �4 /IeY �;� G. Y ��a5 hoiveL d i 40 . ILI Al A 1� 0 1 C SOUTH HARRIET PARK NEIGHBORHOOD SURVEY REGARDING CURBS AND GUTTERS The South Harriet Park neighbors are are doing our own survey concerning the curb and gutter issue with a more up to date and possibly more inclusive response of what we wish as a neighborhood. We would appreciate your opinion of this issue. Thank You DATE I NAME AND SIGNATURE ADDRESS DO YOU PREFER CURBS AND GUTTERS YES INO ,4.1M 5a.�dy Ake 5351 Da�Claw� a ♦.. IL. f-41 d Qla I 1A �1 I I� 0 I� Ab ! l/ '0" No / Yo A/ CD No SOUTH HARRIET PARK NEIGHBORHOOD SURVEY REGARDING CURBS AND GUTTERS The South Harriet Park neighbors are are doing our own survey concerning the curb and gutter issue with a more up to date and possibly more inclusive response of what we wish as a neighborhood. We would appreciate your opinion of this issue. Thank You DATE I NAME AND SIGNATURE ADDRESS DO YOU PREFER CURBS AND GUTTER YES I v 7Q�sN S3a$' o�'cf�.► �►� VWA G. a. /5-/6 5- / y IV 2�b V-5 3l oG k 4 /iic.. x X X x X SOUTH HARRIET PARK NEIGHBORHOOD SURVEY REGARDING CURBS AND GUTTERS The South Harriet Park neighbors are are doing our own survey concerning the curb and gutter issue with a more up to date and possibly more inclusive response of what we wish as a neighborhood. We would appreciate your opinion of this issue. Thank You DATE I NAME AND SIGNATURE Z- '7- 0- �I ICI �5 Loalr ADDRESS DO YOU PREFER CURBS AND GUT T ER YES I .2116�� �3 - tj , ZZ$i�'h Nab SOUTH HARRIET PARK NEIGHBORHOOD SURVEY REGARDING CURBS AND GUTTERS The South Harriet Park neighbors are are doing our own survey concerning the curb and gutter issue with a more up to date and possibly more inclusive response of what we wish as a neighborhood. We would appreciate your opinion of this issue. Thank You DATE I NAME AND ADDRESS I DO YOU PREFER CURBS SIGNATURE AND G. U ERS <jSIUS /:� 41.i 02/51os 41oios l.VJ. 1 {At 7% '; ( Sriv�� �• ` +u� ,, .,r...�. ,v - -- ya-� 4UA7'a--, �vd(,, awl 5 3 2--1 "kt ,,-A w- ,'3 5-33 (o Brmicutew A -s-;2 A-5- IV 3�Qo 523(t, 1<-e<<"N- � 6,5 X IL C\t e t u�d IoS �cj J , t-Ar c .) Q-�r c . 4 6,54- -H a 6qL IV ^), c %"y 5l<- -AL �, SOUTH HARRIET PARK NEIGHBORHOOD SURVEY REGARDING CURBS AND GUTTERS �34 I v,l;- The South Harriet Park neighbors are are doing our own survey concerning the curb and gutter issue with a more up to date and possibly more inclusive response of what we wish as a neighborhood. We would appreciate your opinion of this issue. Thank You DATE I NAME AND SIGNATURE ^,, 411 / Ily Z / /o /o 5 /iOjGS 1 dill +djirv► f�1 ck -�, Exrv----Jr ADDRESS DO YOU PREFER CURBS AND GUTTERS YES INO i 631 n kl , lr�,' � 63D0 -8rooku le 1 Me, 5:3 Ac} Nrx) Lv 5 31 f ct.- w/N , 4,- ,3 c :,G: SOUTH HARRIET PARK NEIGHBORHOOD SURVEY REGARDING CURBS AND GUTTERS The South Harriet Park neighbors are are doing our own survey concerning the curb and gutter issue with a more up to date and possibly more inclusive response of what we wish as a neighborhood. We would appreciate your opinion of this issue. Thank You DATE I NAME AND SIGNATURE ),I 5/ 05 a /s/os S-/ 1,616 S �i5�os ;-/ 5-/ 0 s .20- 505G, - -Nq.d 6 /Uo hlytr _AO-L &t, J C < -K C,(NfP17 �g V, ADDRESS DO YOU PREFER CURBS AND GUT T� YES O 305 4-+lyAw ►-, P-1 F_ e-4 - "vA 554 534 paA04,NV, N,re,vt 4E(A 1,N v mtj S-54,14 5' ,QYo 0&V&,,-- /fie S 5-zyr fz,5 2" Na AJi7 � N6 SOUTH HARRIET PARK NEIGHBORHOOD SURVEY REGARDING CURBS AND GUTTERS The South Harriet Park neighbors are are doing our own survey concerning the curb and gutter issue with a more up to date and possibly more inclusive response of what we wish as a neighborhood. We would appreciate your opinion of this issue. Thank You DATE I NAME AND SIGNATURE ,�- // -- ois- a]IN)an � 16 �I It 45 w Clr-rs Bej z- 5k4so' ► (�" I av-f y� � o(7q 611 P 4 4ff,A- 01414M ADDRESS DO YOU PREFER CURBS AND GUTTERS - YES INO "A V)O ,5,3vI r �(o /\f o SOUTH HARRIET PARK NEIGHBORHOOD SURVEY REGARDING CURBS AND GUTTERS The South Harriet Park neighbors are are doing our own survey concerning the curb and gutter issue with a more up to date and possibly more inclusive response of what we wish as a neighborhood. We would appreciate your opinion of this issue. Thank You DATE NAME AND ADDRESS DO YOU PREFER CURBS SIGNATURE AND GUTTERS YES NO SOUTH HARRIET PARK NEIGHBORHOOD SURVEY REGARDING CURBS AND GUTTERS The South Harriet Park neighbors are are doing our own survey concerning the curb and gutter issue with a more up to date and possibly more inclusive response of what we wish as a neighborhood_ We would appreciate your opinion of this issue. Thank You DATE I NAME AND ADDRESS DO YOU PREFER CURBS SIGNATURE AND GUTTERS YES I NO SOUTH HARRIET PARK NEIGHBORHOOD SURVEY REGARDING CURBS AND GUTTERS The South Harriet Park neighbors are are doing our own survey concerning the curb and gutter issue with a more up to date and possibly more inclusive response of what we wish as a neighborhood. We would appreciate your opinion of this issue. Thank You DATE NAME AND ADDRESS DO YOU PREFER CURBS SIGNATURE AND GUT: ERS YES I NO _L/II /Dr- ��i3 -o5 GU - N/0 NL) INS 02/14/05 02:45 FAX Q01 FROM S►,utae r.:,X N0. : 612 927 8301 =aiz- 13 -?MS 03 :20PM F1 SOUTH HARRIET PARK NEIGHBORHDOG SURVEY REGARDING CURaS AND GUTTERS The South Harris. Park neighbors are are do�tlg our own survey concerning the Curb and gutter issue with a more up to date and possibly more inclusive response of what we wish a6 a neighborhood. We would appreciate your opinion of this issue. Thank You DATE NAME AND ADDRESS DC YOU PF 7-FER CURBS SIGINATUIRE AND GU (TEAS YES i No I SOUTH HARRIET PARK NEIGHBORHOOD SURVEY REGARDING CURBS AND GUTTERS The South Harriet Park neighbors are are doing our own survey concerning the curb and gutter issue with a more up to date and possibly more inclusive response of what we wish as a neighborhood. We would appreciate your opinion of this issue. Thank You DATE I NAME AND SIGNATURE X6)6 ADDRESS DO YOU PREFER CURBS AND GUTTERS YES NO _ f / , V V rV1�►' a S 3 a k FvIIh;er X a //5. SOUTH HARRIET PARK NEIGHBORHOOD SURVEY REGARDING CURBS AND GUTTERS The South Harriet Park neighbors are are doing our own survey concerning the curb and gutter issue with a more up to date and possibly more inclusive response of what we wish as a neighborhood. We would appreciate your opinion of this issue. Thank You DATE I NAME AND SIGNATURE ADDRESS DO YOU PREFER CURBS AND GUTTERS YES I NO / n �(U N� � CITY OF EDINA PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: February 8, 2005 TO: Council Members Linda Masica and Ann S, , nson FROM: Ed MacHolda, Assistant Director SUBJECT: Gymnasium Update Attached you will find the minutes from the first JPOC meeting held on Thursday, January 20`h, the joint powers agreement as well as the second draft of the facility drawings. Items of note on the ECC/Normandale Elementary School site drawing, which were brought up at our most recent user group meeting and now in the process of being revised are: • Make entrance more visible by extending Plaza. • Create better drop- off/pickup by sliding the ADA parking to the south and pulling the curb slightly away from the building. • Create better viewing of parking pickup and stadium by reversing the restrooms /concessions with the lobby. • Add exterior lighting. • Add signage. Items of note on the South View Middle School site drawing, which have been identified and now in the process of being revised are: • Highlight one entrance by eliminating the south entrance and extending the Terrace. • Add exterior lighting. • Insert elevator for accessibility versus sending special need population down the school hallway. Lastly, the design process is going nicely with the user group and JPOC meeting about every three weeks. We have had valuable input from both the neighborhood representative (Dan Rectenwald) and the athletic association presidents. Our next meeting and chance to look at the revised drawings will be Friday, February 25`h Kraus- Anderson® Construction Company 8625 Rendova Street N.E., P.O. Box 158 Phone: (763) 786 -7711 Circle Pines, MN 55014 Fax: (763) 786 -2650 Date: January 27, 2005 Project: New Gymnasiums City of Edina & Edina ISD 273 Edina, MN Subject: JPOC Meeting No. 01 January 20, 2005 Present: Doug Johnson Jay Willemssen Peyton Robb Ted Rozeboom John Huenink John Keprios Ed MacHolda Scot Housh Jim Hovland Jeff Johnson To: Jay Willemssen Doug Johnson Peyton Robb Ted Rozeboom John Huenink Chad Rettke ISD 273 ISD 273 ISD 273, JPOC VP Chair RMA KAMW Edina Park & Rec City of Edina JPOC Chair Elect ISD 273 ISD 273 ISD 273 RMA KA KA MINUTES OF JOINT POWERS OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE MEETING NO. 1 January 20, 2005 John Keprios Edina Park & Rec Ed MacHolda City of Edina Jim Hovland Scot Housh Jeff Johnson Jeff Moore KA Date of Origin Item # Description Action By New Business 1/20/05 1.1 Draft No. 3, Joint Powers Agreement was handed out for review (attached). Jay Willemssen will furnish a copy to the State of MN for review. ISD 273 1/20/05 1.2 KA to furnish construction phasing diagrams for South View Middle School and ECC/Normandale. KA 1%20/05 1.3 KA and RMA will develop bid packaging for District and City approval. KA, RMA 1/20/05 1.4 RMA discussed preliminary gym site locations that appeared good to JPOC. 1/20/05 1.5 RMA will review entrance and traffic flow design at South View. RMA City of Edina & ISD 273 -2- JPOC Meeting No. 01 Edina, MN January 20, 2005 Date of Origin Item # Description Action By 1/20/05 1.6 RMA will design gym ceiling heights to accommodate volleyball. RMA 1/20/05 1.7 RMA discussed consideration of having a wood floor in one gym and synthetic floor in the other. This will be further discussed with the user groups. 1/20/05 1.8 RMA will work on positioning the ECC gym further west to accommodate southwest parking lot and entrances. 1/20/05 1.9 RMA noted it would be beneficial to find a way to fit concessions into the ECC city gym scheme. RMA The next JPOC meeting will be held on Tuesday, February 8, 2005, at 7:30 a.m. in Room 349, Edina Community . Center. Submitted by: - KRAUS- ANDERSON® CONSTRUCTION COMPANY MIDWEST DMSION john Ifuenink H. John Huenink Senior Project Manager HJH:db Attachment (6 pages) Draft No. 3 1/5/05 JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT Dated as of 12005 This Agreement is made on , 2005, between Independent School District No. 273, a Minnesota public corporation (the "District "), and the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City"). 1: PURPOSE The District and the City have determined that is in the best interests of the residents of the: District and the City to undertake in a cooperative fashion the construction of two new gymnasiums on the District's Community Center Campus (the "Project "). The goal of the District and the City is to provide for the use of the facilities by members of the community in a_ _ manner that is more cost effective and accessible than if such facilities were duplicated by the District and the City. The purpose of this agreement is to set ^forth the terms governing the design and construction of the Project and the ownership, operation, maintenance, and sale of the resulting facilities. The overall guiding principle embodied in this agreement is the mutual desire of the District and the City to maximize the use of the facilities resulting from the Project by all members of the District's and City's respective constituencies. This agreement is made pursuant to.Minnesota Statutes, Section 471:59. 2. JOINT POWERS OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE 2.1 To assist with the design and construction of the Project the District and the City . agree to. establish a committee to be known as the Edina Joint Powers Oversight Committee (the "JPOC"). . 2.2. The JPOC shall consist of eight members. The District and the City shall each appoint two members of its governing body to serve as voting members. The District and the City shall each appoint two ex officio members to the Board, who need not be members of their governing bodies. 2:3 ;, The officers of the JPOC shall elect a Chair who shall be one of the governing^ body representatives. 2.4 The duties of the JPOC shall consist of advising the City and District.on design, contracts, payments of bills and other construction issues that may arise. 2.5 The JPOC, shall terminate upon the final completion of the construction .of the Project and payment of all costs thereof or upon such earlier date as this Agreement shall terminate pursuant to Section 12.2 hereof. / , 3. PROJECT 3.1 The Project shall consist of the facilities identified in Exhibit A hereto, subject to modification as. provided herein. . 3.2 The costs of the Project will be paid by the City as provided in Section 6.1 hereof. The District acknowledges that the cost of the Project will be financed by the City through the . issuance.by the_Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "HRA ") of Lease Revenue Bonds (the `Bonds "). In connection with the Bonds the District agrees to enter into a ground lease under which it will lease to the HRA those District lands on which the Project will be constructed.together with other property rights related to the construction and operation . of the Project pursuant to a Ground Lease in the form attached as Exhibit A hereto (the "Ground . Lease "), and the City will make rental payments to the HRA pursuant ,to a Lease Agreement between the HRA and City (the "Lease Agreement') "in amounts sufficient to pay the principal and interest on the Bonds. The obligation of the City to make such rental payments is subject to annual appropriation by the City Council and if the City Council determines not to make an appropriation for the payment of the rental payments the City shall have no further obligation to make such rental payments. However, the City shall continue to be liable for payment of costs under Section 7. 1, and under the Facilities Use Agreement, notwithstanding any action to cancel the Lease Agreement. The Bonds will be issued by the HRA under a Trust Indenture between the HRA and trustee to be named (the "Trustee "), and the rights of the HRA in the Ground Lease and the Lease Agreement will be assigned to the Trustee as security for the purpose of the Bonds. The obligation of the HRA to make the principal and interest on the Bonds will be limited to the rental payments to be received from the City under the Lease Agreement. The principal amount of the Bonds will be based on the estimated amount of the cost of the Project plus (i) bond discount, bond counsel fees, financial advisory fees, rating agency fees and other costs and expenses incurred by the HRA and City in issuing the Bonds and (ii) if required in connection with the marketing of the Bonds, to fund a debt service reserve fund for the Bonds. The decision to issue the Bonds and any bonds to refund the Bonds and the. timing and structure thereof rests solely with the HRA and City; provided however, that the final maturity of the Bonds and any bonds to refund the Bonds shall be on or before February 1, 2028. However, the Bonds shall be sold on a schedule that assures that funds are available to the City to adequately pay bills as costs are incurred in design and construction of the Project. The District shall enter into the Ground Lease with the HRA simultaneously with the execution and delivery of this Agreement. 4. OWNERSHIP 4.1 The facilities to be constructed as part of the Project will be owned by the District subject to the rights of the City, the HRA and the Trustee under the Ground Lease and Lease Agreement, and the District will make the facilities available for community use as provided in the Facility Use Agreement between the District and the City attached as Exhibit B hereto (the "Facilities Use Agreement ") to be executed by the City and the District simultaneously with the execution and delivery of this Agreement. -2- I` 5. DESIGN 5.1 The City will promptly proceed to retain Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc. for the purpose of preparing preliminary plans and design development drawings for the Project. The preliminary plans and design development shall be submitted to the City and District for approval. Following completion of these drawings and approval thereof by the City and District, the City will file an application for a conditional use permit pursuant to the Edina City Code. If the conditional use permit is approved, the City will authorize the project architects to proceed with construction plans and specifications. The construction plans will also include a cost estimate. The final cost estimate will include all costs associated with the Project, including, but not limited to, design fees as well as a contingency budget for unforeseeable circumstances associated with the construction. Final construction plans, specifications and cost estimates will. be submitted to both the City and the District for City Council and School Board approval. The City will comply' with any requirements of Minnesota law with respect to approvals of such plans and specifications by the Commissioner of Education, since the facilities to be constructed as part of the Project will take place on property of the District. The District shall cooperate with the City in obtaining any such approvals. The City may charge its customary fees for the review of plans and specifications, the issuance of permits and inspection of work on the Project in accordance with the Uniform Building Code. 6. CONSTRUCTION 6.1 If final construction plans and specifications are approved by the City Council and School Board, the HRA and City have authorized the issuance of the Bonds sufficient to fund the Project, and state and local approvals have been obtained, then the City shall proceed with construction of the Project. The City will advertise for bids in accordance with the requirements of the municipal contracting law. The City shall retain an independent construction manager for the Project who will oversee all construction bidding and processing of payments. 6.2 Prior to awarding construction contracts the City will review the bids received with the District and JPOC. If the contracts exceed the cost estimates contained in the construction plans (including a contingency budget) previously approved by the District and the City, the City, with the approval of the District, shall eliminate or modify the proposed contracts in order that the contracts awarded do not exceed the costs estimates contained in the construction plans previously approved by.the District and the City. If the District and City are unable to -, agree upon such contract elimination or modifications, the City shall. so decide and the City shall thereupon proceed with the Project as modified by the City. However, any such modification of the Project by the City shall be subject to the following limitations: (a) The City may not, without the District's consent, make Project modifications that would adversely impact the District's instruction of students; (b) The City may not, without the District's consent, make Project modifications that would adversely impact the health, safety, or security of District students or staff; and -3- N (c) The City may not, without the District's consent, make Project modifications that change the exterior appearance of the buildings to be constructed as part of the Project. Any disputes regarding the application of (a), (b) or (c) above shall be resolved through the dispute resolution process contained in Article 7 hereof 6.3 The City will be the contracting party and will use ordinary and prudent efforts to require that the Project is constructed in compliance with approved plans and specifications and completed with all reasonable promptness in accordance with the schedule prepared by the architect. During construction, representatives of the City will be .given access to the construction site at all reasonable' times. 6.4 The JPOC must review any change order which increases the cost of any individual construction contract for the Project by more than $5,000 of the original amount thereof or which materially changes the scope of the Project. The City shall then consider the recommendation of the JPOC and obtain the written authorization of the District prior to approving any change order. However, prior written authorization is not necessary if the change order presents imminent health/safety issues making prior authorization impractical. In such . cases, the change order shall be seasonably presented to the District for ratification. The District must not unreasonably withhold its consent to change orders resulting from unforeseen circumstances arising from the construction. 7. PAYMENT OF COSTS OF PROJECT 7.1 All costs of the Project will.be paid by the City. Project costs include, but are not limited to, costs of the preparation by the Project architects of the construction plans and specifications for the Project, construction management costs, all costs related to obtaining all necessary permits and approvals for the Project, legal costs incurred in connection with agreements, and any and all other costs associated with the Project. [All invoices or requests for payment,will be approved by the JPOC and then forwarded to the City for payment.] Portions of the Project may be bid by the City together with other District facilities which are not part of the Project that are being constructed by the District. If reasonably possible, the Project shall be bid so that the cost of these facilities is separately identified. If not possible to separately identify the cost, the construction manager for the Project will make a determination of the allocable cost of the Project and such District facilities, and furnish such determination to the District and the City for approval. Any disputes regarding the determination of allocable costs of the Project and such District facilities shall be resolved through the dispute resolution process contained in Article 8 hereof. If this Agreement is terminated under Section 12.2 hereof the City shall nevertheless be liable for the payment of such Project costs which are incurred up to the date of termination of this Agreement, or as a result of termination of this Agreement. The District shall submit to the City invoices for any costs billed to the District that are to be paid by the City under this Section -4- I 8. DISPUTE RESOLUTION 8.1 If a dispute arises between the District and the City regarding this agreement or the construction of the Project, the District Superintendent and the City Manager, or their designers,; must promptly meet and attempt in. good faith to negotiate a resolution of the dispute. 8:2 If the City and District have not negotiated a resolution of the dispute within 30 days after this meeting, the District and the City may jointly select a mediator to facilitate further discussion. 8.3 If a mediator is not used or if the parties are unable to resolve the dispute within 30 days after first meeting with the selected-mediator, the dispute will be submitted to binding arbitration before a panel of three arbitrators in accordance with the commercial arbitration rules of the American Arbitration Association, except that disputes involving an amount less than $25,000 will be submitted to a single arbitrator. 8.4 The District and the City will equally share the costs of conducting any mediation or arbitration, excluding each party's cost for preparation of its own case. 8.5 In addition to the dispute resolution, mechanisms contained in this section, each party may seek specific performance of the other party's obligations under this agreement. 9. GROUND LEASE 9.1 The District shall lease to the HRA those lands on which the Project is to be. located pursuant to the terms of the Ground Lease. 10. LIABILITY, INSURANCE 10.1 The City will obtain sufficient insurance (in accordance with prevailing community standards) to protect the parties' exposures to loss and liability during the time of facility construction. This insurance and payment of any deductibles will be part of the cost of the Project. 10.2 Once the facility is constructed and occupied, the District will obtain sufficient .property and casualty insurance, (in accordance with prevailing community standards) to cover the replacement cost of the resulting facilities and its contents. 11. SALE OR TRANSFER OF FACILITY 11.1 Except as provided in Section 11.2 hereof, in consideration of the contribution by the City for the capital costs of the Project, the District agrees that it may not sell its interest in the resulting facilities, render them unusable or unavailable for community use or materially alter the facilities during the term of the Facilities Use Agreement without the City's prior approval. 11.2 If the School Board has declared the school facility in which a facility resulting from the Project is located as surplus property, and authorized the sale of the school facility, then the District may sell, the facility, provided that no such sale may occur prior to February 1, 2015. -5- I Upon any such sale the District shall reimburse the City for the Project costs of the facility resulting from the Project sold amortized over a 30 -year period commencing upon the completion of the construction of such facility. For example for a sale occurring 15 years after the completion of the construction of the facility the District shall be required to reimburse the City for 50% of the cost of construction of such facility. Upon the payment of such amount by the District to the City the City shall obtain the release of the facility with respect to which such payment is made for the Ground Lease and the Lease Agreement. 1173 Any dispute regarding matters covered by Sections 11.1 or 11.2 will be resolved pursuant to the dispute resolution procedures in Section 8. 12. GENERAL PROVISIONS 12.1 All notices under this agreement must be delivered personally or sent by first class mail addressed to: If to the District: Superintendent . I.S.D. No. 273 5701 Normandale Boulevard Edina, MN 55424 If to the City: City Manager City of Edina 4801 West 50`h Street Edina, MN 55424 or addressed to such party at such other address as such party shall hereafter furnish by notice to the other party. 12.2 This Agreement shall terminate if either the District or the City fails to approve the construction plans for the Project. 12.3 This Agreement may be amended only in writing, executed by the proper representatives of both parties. 12.4 This Agreement must be interpreted under the laws of the State of.Minnesota. 10 DAVID E. LUNDSTROM 4912 RIDGE PLACE EDINA. MN 55424 TELEPHONE (952) 926 -8810 Saturday, December 4, 2004 j Mr. Steven L. Lillehaug Edina City Hall 4801 West 50'h Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Dear Mr. Lillehaug: I attended the public information meeting held on November 9, 2004, and I have been reviewing the Survey and Comment Sheet recently mailed to all Sunnyslope residents. The issues involved are serious enough so that I need more comment space than provided on the back of the survey. I moved into my house on Ridge Place April 1, 1965, so I will soon be a 40 -year resident. I have never felt deprived by the absence of curbs and gutters, sidewalks, or additional street lights in all those years. Sunnyslope is a delightful area in which to live, less urbanized than the Country Club area, with more rolling terrain, larger and irregular shaped lots, many mature trees, and a more casual semi -rural appearance. I like it that way. Necessary repairs to water and sewer lines and resurfacing of the streets are all well and good and should be opposed by no one; we all want sound, pot - hole -free streets. But "If it ain't broke, don't fix it," remains a sound motto. I recently watched the resurfacing of west 50'' street south of Sunnyslope. It was done in a few days with minimal disruption of traffic. Why could not a similar process be applied to the Sunnyslope streets without making a summer -long mess? I have invited old friends from the east coast to be my house guests this summer, and the last thing I want to show them is a neighborhood torn up by heavy machinery. Burying utility lines is an idea that sounds attractive, but I question whether it is worth the cost and the mess that would result. Trenching machines would excavate along the back of established lots, tearing up gardens and tree roots and causing at least a short interruption of power. My electric and telephone lines come underground from the power poles, so the change would not be a problem for me, but remember that with no power poles everyone would have to have their power lines, telephone lines and TV cables buried, and would have to have a hole punched in their basement walls below ground level for entry of the lines. If we had suffered a wind storm that knocked down trees and power poles, I would support rebuilding with underground utilities. To change the perfectly acceptable power distribution system that has served the neighborhood since the late 1940's just for aesthetics would not seem good sense. Currently we have street lights at all street intersections. What purpose would be served by adding additional lamp posts between intersections? The one improvement that could be justified by conditions that have changed since the Sunnyslope area was developed is the sound barrier at highway 100. The highway has been widened from two lanes to three in each direction and traffic is much heavier than years ago. A barrier would benefit West Sunnyslope residents especially, but when the wind is from the west the traffic noise is evident to others as well. Thanks to Minnehaha Creek, Sunnyslope has no through traffic. Any "traffic calming measures" therefore would be directed at residents coming and going and the occasional delivery truck. Because the most remote house in Sunnyslope is no more than three blocks from 50`h street, a posted speed limit of 25 or even 20 miles per hour would be reasonable. If an Edina policeman were to give only two or three tickets to speeders, the message would spread through the neighborhood like gossip, and any traffic problem would be solved. This makes far more sense than penalizing the majority of residents with speed bumps, traffic circles, and such nonsense. I hope these thoughts from a long time resident have been helpful. Very truly yours, David E. Lundstrom Page 1 of 2 Jim Hovland From: Rod Hardy [rhardy @siennacorp.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 11:24 AM To: Jim Hovland Cc: krier001 @gold.tc.umn.edu; jmichels @eorinc.com Subject: RE: Council Presentation Jim, Thank you for taking the time to review any material. My purpose in sending it is merely to introduce one of the facets involved in street design. The material prepared by Emmons and Oliver is from a broader presentation they have created with a focus on forms of storm water management and the impact it has on the design of streets. It is a presentation funded by Met Council which would be worthwhile in a workshop, not in a Public Hearing. My main thrust tonight will be to request that Council accept the feasibility report and order in the project with the proviso that alternate design solutions we carefully investigated and that some areas might be built without curbs or different type curbs. We will propose creating a design task force to deal with this. It should be able to deal with other similar situations in other similar neighborhoods. Hope this is helpful. Thanks Rod Hardy From: Jim Hovland [mailto:jhovland @krauserollins.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 10:40 AM To: Rod Hardy Subject: RE: Council Presentation Rod, I will try to review before the meeting tonight. Any comments on Steve Lillehaug's memo to you? - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Rod Hardy [mailto:rhardy @siennacorp.com] Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 1:41 PM To: slillehaug @ci.edina.mn.us Cc: jhovland @krauserollins.com Subject: FW: Council Presentation Steve(and Jim), Attached is the Copy of the PDF file that is the basis for the information for a presentation by a person from Emmons and Oliver Resources. We would request that both the Council and staff have a work session to learn in more detail what options are available in street design that better meets the desires of the residents while meeting the underlying requirements of the city.. I will plan to comment on this at the public hearing and request that as part of the design process alternate design considerations are given. If you have any further questions please call me at 952 - 835 -2808. Thank you Rod Hardy From: Jay Michels [mailto:jmichels @eorinc.com] Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 10:59 AM To: Rod Hardy Subject: Council Presentation Rod — Take a look at this and let me know what you think. If I am going to do a presentation, I think that it would be best if we had it cleared in advance of tomorrows meeting. Let me know your thoughts. Jay Michels Emmons & Olivier Resources, Inc. 651 Hale Ave. North Oakdale, MN 55128 P-651- 770 -8448 2/15/2005 zl� UZI aS�- �abm�c �yu��y�3 r ➢1 Existing Conditions • Existing roadway width: 26 -ft to 32 -ft. _ Majority of streets without curb & gutter. Boulders / landscaping in boulevard. hnprov .t No. BA-326 Existing Curb & Gutter a _ Locations std- ,ryr, hnprovamsM No. BA-MG Existing Conditions Roadway Band -aid Patch - . Deteriorated Work hnprov ent No. BA-MS Existing Conditions —71 Deteriorated edge Drainage problems at of roadways Dale & Sunnyslope �5�, � hnpm mmR No. BA.72B r ➢3 Project Issues • Curb and gutter - Not favored by all. • Overhead utilities - Relocation to underground. • Decorative street lighting. • Sound wall. • Sidewalk along West 50th Street (between Dale Drive and Browndale Avenue). • New traffic signal system on West 50th Street at Dale Drive. 6nprovamant No. BA-326 Total Surveyed Surveys Prefer Curb 8 Gutter Rebtmed Yes No t3 -HEAD S -MOUNT 74 52 13 29 22 20 % of Retumed Surreys 70% 25% 56°/u 42% 38% ➢4 Project Survey Results (cont...) Total Surveyed Prefer Utility Relocate Yea I No Style Y6 NO 74 22 27 % of Retumed Surveys 42% 1 52% hnprovement No. BA-32e Project Survey Results (cont...) Total Surveyed Prefer Decorative Street Lights Yes No Style Y6 NO YES Cobntal Acorn Traditional 74 �33 19 2.05 1.88 1.21 % of Returned Surveys 1 62% 37% Improvement No. BA-326 Project Survey Results (cont...) Total Surveyed PreferSoundwall WIO Assess W /Assess Y6 NO YES No 74 26 18 16 32 % aF Returned Sureys 50% 1 35% 1 31% 1 62% Improvement No. OA- M ➢5 Project Survey Results (cont...) trnprov nt No. BA-326 Total Surveyed Perceived Traffic Safe Issue Yes No 74 75 34 % of Returned Surreys 29 °h 65% Project Survey Results (cont...) trnprov nt No. BA-326 Total Surveyed Prefer New Sidewalks Yes No 74 7 44 % of Returned Surveys 13% 85% Project Survey Results (cont...) Total Surveyed kI:2 74 % of Returned Sureys trnprow nt No. BA-326 ➢6 W Project Scope • Reconstruct roadways to Include: • Roadway width of 29 feet back -to -back (Hilltop Lane 31 feet). • New 8618 concrete curb and gutter (both sides). • New concrete driveway aprons. • Decorative lighting. Ynpro nt Na BA-326 Project Scope Update City Utilities to Include: ■ New watermain and services (to curb box). - • New Hydrants • Sanitary and storm sewer repairs & replacements. ■ New sump pump drain tile. hnprov nt Na BA-328 ➢7 v. Project Costs • Roadway Project Cost: $ 1,086,000 Liahtina Project Cost: $ 140.000 Total $ 1,226.000 • Utility Cost: Utility Costs are not included in roadway costs. These costs will be funded by the respective utility fund (e.g. water, storm sewer and sanitary sewer) hnprovemeM No. BA-326 Assessments Methodology - Neighborhood reconstruction: • Based on residential equivalent unit (REU) • Single family home is 1 REU • Adjacent properties with side or rear yards are assessed 1/3 REU (Based on address of property). i; hnprav nt No. BA-326 ➢8 Proposed Assessments • $16,800 per residential equivalent unit. ■ $12,800 without curb & gutter • 10 year assessment. • 6.5 % interest on unpaid balance. knprovem•nt No. BA-326 Preliminary Assessments aw �1? - tmprovem nt No. BA-326 Project Schedule Neighborhood Informational Mtg ....... Nov 8, 2004 Council Orders Public Hearing ........Jan 18, 2005 Receive Feasibility Report. ................ Feb 1, 2005 Public Hearing .... ............................Feb 15, 2005 Bid Opening .......... .........................Spring 2005 Award Contract .... ..........................Spring 2005 Begin Construction ..........................Spring 2005 Complete Construction ..................October 2005 Ynprovemanrt No. BA-326 ➢9 Staff Recommendation AUTHORIZE: IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -326 hnprovammrt No. BA326 ➢10 PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH HARRIET PARK (WEST) NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENT NO. A-204 Ox trnpro� No. A•204 C 3 KM DO' co Project History / Initiation • Neighborhood • • •� • • meeting held on �� • s : • • of November 8, 2004 - � `� • • History of water ;% main and service t�� ' �•• line breaks. WO ecN94 Improvement No. A-204 Project History / Initiation • Surface water drainage issues: • Level roadways & lack of storm sewer system • Many sump pumps OQ i. ®•ate Improvement No. A -204 Existing Conditions • Existing roadway width- 22-ft to 30 -ft. • No curb and gutter. • Boulders / landscaping in boulevard. • On street parking bays. • Parking on roadway along Arden Park. Improvement No. A -204 f W, 3 Existing Conditions Roadway Band -aid Patch Deteriorated Work hnprownent No. Ad04 Existing Conditions J � Vehicles Drive on Drainage Problems Yards on Edge of Road hnproromam No. A-M4 Project Issues • Curb and gutter - Not favored by all. • Overhead utilities - Relocation to underground. • Decorative street lighting. • Concerns with Impacts to mature trees. • Cost of project. • Inconvenience of project (e.g. access, dust, noise, temporary water service, etc.) Ynpmemnt No. A,IN 1` c Project Survey Results Total Surveyed Surveys Returned prefer Curb 8 Gutter Yes No l3ditJ1D Sa1A0UN ' 84 88 29 39 28 27 %of Returned Surveys 81% 1431/6157% 41% 40% .� I prov nt No. A -204 Project Surv ey Results - Onprov°meM No. A-204 Project Surv Prefer Overhead Total Surveyed Utilities Relocated to Underground Yes No 84 13 55 %of Returned Surveys 19% 81% ey Results 6nprovenMM No. A -204 Prefer Decorative Total Surveyed Street Lights Yes. No , 84 23 43 %ofRetumedSurveys 34% 83% ➢4 ey Results - Onprov°meM No. A-204 Project Surv Prefer Overhead Total Surveyed Utilities Relocated to Underground Yes No 84 13 55 %of Returned Surveys 19% 81% ey Results 6nprovenMM No. A -204 Prefer Decorative Total Surveyed Street Lights Yes. No , 84 23 43 %ofRetumedSurveys 34% 83% ➢4 Prefer Overhead Total Surveyed Utilities Relocated to Underground Yes No 84 13 55 %of Returned Surveys 19% 81% ey Results 6nprovenMM No. A -204 Prefer Decorative Total Surveyed Street Lights Yes. No , 84 23 43 %ofRetumedSurveys 34% 83% ➢4 ey Results 6nprovenMM No. A -204 Prefer Decorative Total Surveyed Street Lights Yes. No , 84 23 43 %ofRetumedSurveys 34% 83% ➢4 Prefer Decorative Total Surveyed Street Lights Yes. No , 84 23 43 %ofRetumedSurveys 34% 83% ➢4 ➢4 Project Scope • Reconstruct roadways to Include: • Roadway width of 25 -27 feet (back -to- back). • New 8618 concrete curb and gutter (both sides). New concrete driveway aprons. hnprovemrd No. Project Scope • Update City Utilities to Include: • New watermain and r services (to curb box). • New Hydrants • Sanitary and storm sewer repairs & ' replacements. • New sump pump drain tile. hnprovam•M Nw A -200 Plan View ➢5 4. �4•rK'I�`�lu � � ,'� iGrlY� (Uar� ItWP IL�*�lyi 9i:.:u� lam" "'''�.�.'.�i -vi.. y ai i 107t ; 3?1 ➢5 Proposed Typical T- Intersection l: trnprov nt No. A•204 Project Costs • Roadway Project Cost: $ 808,000 • Utility Cost: Utility Costs are not included in roadway costs. These costs will be funded by the respective utility fund (e.g. water, storm sewer and sanitary 'sewer) hnprov nt No. A•204 Assessments Methodology — Neighborhood reconstruction: • Based on residential equivalent unit (REU) • Single family home is 1 REU • Adjacent properties with side or rear yards are assessed 1/3 REU (Based on address of property). hnprov nt No. A-204 ➢6 Proposed Assessments • Arden Park: equivalent 11 REUs —City funded: • Analyzed park usage. • Based on potentially buildable lots. • $ 8,700 per residential equivalent unit. ■ $6,300 without curb and gutter. • 10 year assessment. • 6.5 % interest on unpaid balance. Ynprovemn[ Na !- 04 Project Schedule Neighborhood Informational Mtg ....... Nov 8, 2004 Council Orders Public Hearing ........Jan 18, 2005 Receive Feasibility Report .................Feb 1, 2005 Public Hearing .... ............................Feb 15, 2005 Bid Opening ......... ..........................Spring 2005 Award Contract .... ..........................Spring 2005 Begin Construction . .........................Spring 2005 Complete Construction ..................October 2005 trnprov ..M Na "04 ➢7 Staff Recommendation AUTHORIZE: IMPROVEMENT NO. A -204 hnprowneM No. A-2M ➢8