Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-04-05_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL APRIL 5, 2005 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of March 15, 2005. II. ADTOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL RECOGNITION OF TDM EFFORTS BY UNITED PROPERTIES AT CENTENNIAL LAKES I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of March 1, and 15, 2005, and March S and March 14, and March 15, 2005, Special Meetings. II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS Zoning Ordinances: First Reading requires affirmative rollcall votes of three Council members except that a rezoning from residential to non - residential requires four affirmative votes. Second Reading requires affirmative rollcall votes of three of Council to pass except rezoning from residential to non - residential requires four affirmative votes. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall votes of four members of Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council members required passing. Conditional Use Permit: Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council members required to pass. Variance Appeal: Favorable rollcall of Council Members present to uphold or deny appeal A. SET HEARING DATE - (09105) 1. Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance and Conditional Use Permit Final Approval. Haugland Companies. 3901 -3907 West 500 Street and 5000 -5020 France Avenue South. Retail and Residential Redevelopment. 2. Preliminary Plat Approval. The Blake School and City of Hopkins. West of Blake Road/North of Belmore Lane. 3. Final Rezonine and Final Plat Approval. Mark Jones/Pukwana Townhomes LLC. 5125 49" Street West. Townhouse Development 4. Conditional Use Permit. City of Edina and Independent School District 273. Edina Community Center and Southview Campus. Generally located east of Hwy 100, west of Concord Avenue and south of Southview Lane. Construction of Gyms. 5. Conditional Use Permit. Good Samaritan Church. 5730 Grove Street. Church Expansion * B. LOT DIVISION - Party Wall Lot Division - 6016 -6020 Berne Circle C. WALLINGFORD PROPERTIES III. AWARD OF BID * A. Kojetin Park Playground Equipment * B. Jacobsen HR -9016 Rotary Mower - Park Maintenance Department * C. 3/4 Ton Pick -Up Truck - Park Maintenance Department * D. P90 Carbines, Ammunition and Accessories Agenda /Edina City Council April 5, 2005 Page 2 E. Commodities Purchase - Sand, Rock, Bituminous Materials, Concrete & Engine Oil, and Water Treatment Chemicals F. Valley View Road Lighting - Contract 05 -1, Improvement No. L42 IV. REPORTS/ RECOMMENDATIONS A. Transportation Commission Traffic Policy B. Resolution No. 2005 -23 Approving Appointing Cheryl L. Engelman and Gordon Hughes as Agents of the Community Health Board C. Boards, Commissions and Committees Term Limits D. Public Hearing Guidelines E. 40TH Annual Braemar Inspection Tour (7/12/05) F. Ikasu Sushi Bar and Lounge - On -Sale and Sunday Sale Intoxicating Liquor Licenses G. Ikasu Sushi Bar and Lounge - Dance Permit H. Replacement Wetlands Declaration - Braemar Golf Course 17th Tee I. Resolution No. 2005 -25 Receiving Feasibility Reports: Roadway Improvement Projects: A- 216, Schaefer Road; No. A -217, Schaefer Circle; No. BA -328, West 58th Street J. Resolution No. 2005 -26 Setting Hearing Date (5/03/05) - Neighborhood Roadway Improvement Projects: No. BA -312, Bridge Lane & Townes Road, and No. BA -329, Shannon Drive V. FINANCE A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per Pre -List dated March 16, 2005, TOTAL $577,629.78, and March 23, 2005, $1,652,942.25; March 30, 2005, $757,361.78. B. PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -24 - Issue of Revenue Bonds by City of Minneapolis on Behalf of Fairview Health Services VI. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS VII. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS VIII. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES IX. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL X. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEM SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS Mon Apr 11 Board of Appeal and Equalization 5:00 P.M. Thur Apr 14 Volunteer Recognition Reception 5:00 P.M. Tues Apr 19 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Mon Apr 25 Continuation Date Board of Appeals 5:00 P.M. Tues May 3 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues May 17 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Mon May 30 MEMORIAL DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Offices Closed Tues Jun 7 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues June 21 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Thur June 23 Employee Recognition Luncheon 11:00 A.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS EDINBOROUGH PARK COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS BRAEMAR CLLUBHOUSE U e Cn •lam �• �!%PBOe REPORURECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item From: GORDON L. HUGHES' Consent El CITY MANAGER Information Only ❑ Date: APRIL 5, 2005 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: FUND-RAISING PROPOSAL ❑ Motion FOR EDINA PUBLIC ART El Resolution COMMITTEE ❑ Ordinance Discussion REPORT: Attached is a'proposal from the Edina Public Art Committee which„ will be discussed at the 5:30 PM workshop. U i REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF STAINED GLASS PUBLIC ART PROJECT FOR CITY HALL In December 2004, the Edina City Council approved the Edina Public Art Committee's request for $25,000 in 2005 for public art projects. The Committee unanimously recommends that the City Council accept the following proposal for stained glass art panels in the new City Hall. Edina prides itself on its reputation of being a premier city whose residents value a love of culture and the arts. It is the vision of the Edina Public Art Committee to honor the heritage of Edina via stained glass panels that depict Minnehaha Creek and the historic 1857 mill site. The City Hall, the most public of all Edina community spaces, is an appropriate venue for such a project. The "mill that gave birth to a city" uniquely represents Edina and its transformation from a small milling settlement to a preeminent residential and business community. This project benefits the community in several ways: -it creates a warm and welcoming focal point for all visitors to City Hall -it serves as an educational tool for all ages by bringing the history of Edina to life with a visual representation of our city's roots -it builds pride in community heritage and enhances the quality of life through artistic expression and reflection -it encourages cooperation between public and private sectors, city government, and the arts community A successful precedent has been set by the city of Vadnais Heights, which undertook a similar glass project in 2001 to embellish its new city hall, also designed by architect David Kroos. STRATEGY The Edina Public Art Committee has developed "Request for Qualification" (RFQ) materials to be posted on the city's web site and mailed to all area glass artists. (Please refer to attached RFQ). Three finalists will be selected from the applicants and invited to submit specific proposals to the Committee. A stipend of $500 will be paid to each finalist. The Public Art Committee will present its final choice of artist and proposal to the City Council for approval. FUNDING A portion of the $25,000 allocated by the city in 2005 for public art will be utilized and augmented by private and corporate donations to meet the Committee's $75,000 funding goal. The Edina Community Foundation serves as the fiduciary agent. Installation of the glass project is targeted for late 2006. Respectfully submitted, The Edina Public Art Committee Tuesday, April 5, 2005 Workshop and the Edina Public Art Committee at City Hall in the Community Room 5:30- 6:00pm Brief PowerPoint presentation - What is Public Art? What could Public Art be? Why Public Art? Discussion. 6:00- 6:45pm Linda Kieffer, EPAC Chair Presentation The Glass Project at City Hall I it ility Bill Funding Idea Discussion. Included in this packet: • Overview of Public Art • Update on EPAC activities • Artscape brochure • City Hall Art Guide • Call for Artists pamphlet • Utility Funding Proposal • Roster of EPAC Members Note: For Ann Swenson and Alice Hulbert Complete packet with original July 2004 information. If you need additional information before Tuesday's meeting, please contact Diana at 612 -915 -6603, page 612 -579 -6124 or 952 -920 -5856 (home). Public Art can create identity and celebrate public spaces. Do Ro� �$ERSL F CgA Public Art can reflect and honor the history of a community. The EPAC is continuing to study our neighbors' Public Art. This sculpture is entitled Allegory of Excelsior (Paid for entirely by the City of St. Louis Park- $175,000 plus installation costs.) Packet information created in the Peggy Kelly Media Studios at the Edina Art Center Overview of Public Art in Minnesota Cities (Population < 80,0000) Public art projects and programs are flourishing in the metropolitan area and outlying communities. Aside from enhancing aesthetics and quality of life, reflecting community identity, and educating the public, the non -profit arts strengthen the economic development of downtowns, small towns, and neighborhoods across the state. The estimated economic impact of Minnesota non - profit arts organizations is nearly one billion dollars per year (McKnight Foundation, 1996). Metropolitan Suburbs involved with Public Art Projects: Outstate: Apple Valley Duluth Bloomington Elk River Burnsville St. Cloud Chaska Shafer Eagan Eden Prairie Hopkins Maplewood Plymouth Richfield Vadnais Heights The scope of these projects runs the gamut from decorative sidewalk pavers and railings, plaza mosaics, single foyer sculptures, and stained glass window panels, to multi -acre sculpture gardens. Sources of funding are as varied as the pieces themselves and have included city government, developers, community foundations, and corporate and individual donors. The Edina Public Art Committee believes that public art projects in Edina unequivocally support the mission statement of our community: The mission of the City of Edina is to provide effective and valued public services, maintain a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities and guide the development of lands within the City all in a manner which sustains and improves the uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses. Update on Edina Public Art Committee Activities since July, 2004 Completed: Publication of Artscape brochure Display of permanent and rotating pieces in City Hall departmental lobbies and employees' offices Publication of Edina City Hall Art Guide Display of historic Edina Police photos in Police Department Display of artistic bench in City Hall lobby area (piece on loan) Marketing of Public Art Committee's vision and planned projects: -letter and Artscape brochure sent to all Edina resident EAC members (400) - inclusion of Artscape in annual Community Foundation mailing (5500) - article about Edina Public Art Committee in About Town and City Slick - article about Committee and city funding request in Edina Sun Current Visit to Vadnais Heights City Hall to view stained glass, mosaics, and tapestry Draft of Request for Qualifications brochure to glass artists for City Hall Art Glass Project Draft of utility bill funding proposal In Process: Framing and display of Art Dickey photographs for permanent exhibit in 2 "d floor corridor adjacent to Community Room Crosstown Camera Club rotating exhibit of photographs in Community Room Artistic pedestals for three dimensional visual display and signage outside of each City Hall departmental office Edina Public Art Committee logo for decals and refrigerator magnets Planning of fund- raising gala/special. event Future Projects:. Sculptures for Grandview Square Park Edina Public Art Committee The residents of Edina enjoy an exceptionally high quality of life, a strong sense of community and a love of culture and the Arts. The Edina Public Art Committee is comprised of residents and repre- sentatives from the Art Center, City staff and the City Council. The purpose of the committee is to ad- vise the City with regard to all mat- ters pertaining to public visual arts within the City. Linda Kieffer, Chair Bradley Benn, Kristen Christianson, Dick Crockett, Diana Hedges, Betty Hemstod, Linda Masica, Kay Wetherall Ex- Officio and Advisors: Bill Baxley, Gordon Hughes, John Keprios Browndale Bridge, Watercolor by Patti Jeub Donations to, ,ake it possible to purchase art for the Citi3 may be made to t he Edina Community Foundation 5280 Grandview Square Edina MN 55436 For information contact Edina Art Center 4701 West 64th Street Edina MN 55435 Phone: 612 -915 -6600 Fax: 612 -915 -6601 www.EdinaArtCenter.com �,/^�r �o e 2 � a Edina Citig Hall Art Guide Thunder of Light, Oil, Richard Kochenash Rotatin6 Exhibitions and works in the Permanent Collection ..T Guide to Artwork Currently in City Hall First Floor In the Lobby: PLANTERS (also on Second Floor) PC* Ceramics by Adama Sow, EAC faculty LIFETOUCH BENCH NFS Sculpture by Nicolas Legeros & Heidi Hoy TRANQUILITY (by the drinking fountain) PC ** Color Photo by Arlene Green, Edina Resident Park and Recreation: EDINA PARK SCENES PC* Color Photos by Crosby Slater Assessing: ICE SKATERS $950 Acrylic by David Rickert, EAC faculty LIGHTHOUSE, Byron Bay, Australia $650 SEASHORE, Byron Bay, Australia $650 Oils by Linda Kieffer, Edina Art Center Board Planning: PORTRAIT H $665 Collage by Cynthia Stan kweather- Nelson EAC collection UNTITLED $1800 Mixed media by Steve Hartman EAC collection WHICH (Partial Memory) $2200 Ltd Ed Print by Steven Sorman EAC collection All artwork is for sale except Permanent Collection. A portion of the proceeds supports the Edina Art Center. PC* = Permanent Collection PC * *= Xcel Energy purchase award 2004 For more information or to purchase art call the Edina Art Center, 612 - 915 -6600 Building Inspections: EL DORADO Watercolor by Fred Dingler, EAC instructor MONET'S GARDEN Watercolor/Pastel by Clara Saprasa, EAC member LAST SNOW— FIRST SWIM MEANDERING MINNEHAHA LEAVING IN THE MORNING Color photos by Betty Hemstad, Edina resident Second Floor Administration: EDINBOROUGHPARK 50`h & FRANCE Watercolors by Doug Lew, EAC faculty NORTHWOODS MOON (in Cahill conf. room) Pastel by J Thomas Nelson Utilities and Finance: MINNEHAHA CREEK Oil by Paul Abdella, EAC faculty MEANDERING CLOUDS MINNEHAHA CREEK IN MAY VRBANJEWEL Oils by Linda Kieffer, EAC board ROCK DANCE (in conference room) Gelatin Silver Print by Polly Norman, Edina Res. $450 $300 $225 $225 $225 PC* PC* $180 $2300 $600 $350 PC ** PC ** Community Room: Soon the site of rotating exhibitions by the Crosstown Camera Club HIDDEN BAY $240 RIPPLES $280 PINE ISLAND $280 Pastels by J Thomas Nelson, EAC emeritus Hall by the Community Room: Soon the site of the permanent Art Dickey memorial exhibition Project Description The project is in the Edina City Hall at 4801 West 50th Street. It involves two large, two -story exterior window areas which comprise the front entrance of the main foyer (western exposure, 34 ft x 24 ft) and the wall on the opposite end of the lobby (eastern exposure, 10 ft. x 27 ft.) Imagery may be abstract or representa- tional and relate to the theme of Minnehaha Creek and the historic mill site. (information about the original mill and historic photos will be available for final- ists' reference) • We encourage all forms of creative ex- pression. • Both window spaces should be consid- ered as a unified whole and appeal to all ages. • Lighting is available to illuminate the panels. • Any form of art glass may be used. • The finished product must be durable and require little or no maintenance. • Only a portion of the 1000 square feet is expected to be covered. RFQ (Request for Qualifica- tions) Requirements Please submit: 1. Up to 10 full color examples (printed copies) of recent work or related pro- jects 2. A correspondence list of work includ- ing title, media, dimensions, and date 3. Current resume with at least three ref- erences Send all responses to: Linda Kieffer, Chair Edina Public Art Committee c/o The Edina Community Foundation 5280 Grandview Square Edina, MN 55436 All submissions must be postmarked by July 31, 2004. Questions may be directed to Diana Hedges at the Edina Art Center, 612- 915 -6603. •a 41r, ->I Call for Artists Eligibility and Selection Crite- ria Glass artists from the metropolitan area and outstate Minnesota are invited to submit in- troductory materials (see Request for Quali- fications (RFQ) Requirements section on back of flyer). Edina residents are encour- aged to apply. THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR Technical quality of work examples, artists' TIME AND EFFORTS! WE APPRECI- experience, creativity, and ability, and com- ATE YOUR TALENTS AND INTEREST patibility with the vision of the Edina Public IN OUR COMMUNITY Art-Committee will all be considered in the THE EDINA PUBLIC ART COMMITTEE selection process. Background The city of Edina has always recognized the significance of its past while actively preparing for the future. From its incorporation in 1888 as a milling community on the banks of the Minnehaha Creek, Edina has evolved into a preeminent place for living, learning, raising families, and conducting business. Residents value a strong sense of community identity, an exceptionally high quality of life, and recog- nize the importance of art in enriching every- day experiences. In this spirit, the Edina Pub- lic Art Committee was convened in 2004 to enhance the beauty of Edina's public spaces with two and three dimensional art. It is the vision of the Committee to depict and honor Edina's mill heritage with permanent art glass panels to be installed within the existing windows of the new City Hall. The panels should create an engaging and dramatic focal point for all who enter the building. Large, two -story windows which flank the east and west sides of the main foyer comprise the pro- ject area. The Edina Public Art Committee has requested and received funding from the City in the 2005 budget cycle to jumpstart this project. Addi- tional monies will come from private and cor- porate donors to meet our goal. Artist Selectio The artist selection process will consist of three stages: STAGE ONE A panel comprised of the Edina Public Art Committee, a City Hall employee, and com- munity volunteers will review all submis- sions. Upon initial review, up to three final- ists will be selected and interviewed. STAGE TWO Each finalist will be invited to prepare a complete design proposal to include a model and/or drawings for presentation to the panel during the initial interview. A $500 stipend will be awarded for the designs prepared. STAGE THREE The panel will make the final selection and present to the Edina City Council for final approval prior to notifying the selected artist. Project Timeline* June 2005 - -- Announcement of project, mailing of RFQ to area glass artists July 31 - - -- Postmark deadline for submis- sion of RFQ materials August 15 - -- Applicants notified of status Sept. 1 - - -- Informational meeting with fi- nalists Nov. 1 - - -- Finalists present specific pro- posals to Public Art Committee Nov. 15 - -- Public Art Committee submits its choice of finalist to City Council for ap- proval Dec. 1 - - -- Commission awarded Jan. 2006 -- Contracts with participants signed Nov. 2006 —Final installation of project *Dates are tentative • Secured a gift of 12 defibrillators from Fairview Southdale Hospital for the Edina Police Department. • Made grants to the Edina Senior Center. • Defined support of youth services as one of its focus areas by making grants to the Connecting With Kids initiative and the Edina Park and Recreation Department to ensure that low- income families and children would be able to use the Edina Art Center, Aquatic Center and other park facilities. 0 O O I ARTs%r-'APE The Edina Community Foundation is currently raising funds for art and plantings for the new Edina City Hall. c,� CU1j �� • • 2 l J r � N a The Edina Community Foundation has helped fund many other City of Edina Z projects in recent years, including: 'J' a w � S .-• • Purchased thermal imaging equipment ON C for the Edina Fire Department. 1' O � � O • Helped the Edina Art Center acquire a w kiln for firing pottery. • Assisted with funding for a new K -9 Unit for the Edina Police. • Helped an individual make a major contribution to the new South Metro Public Safety Training Facility and served as the funding vehicle for a group of neighbors to contribute the funds necessary to complete Fox Meadow Park. • Secured a gift of 12 defibrillators from Fairview Southdale Hospital for the Edina Police Department. • Made grants to the Edina Senior Center. • Defined support of youth services as one of its focus areas by making grants to the Connecting With Kids initiative and the Edina Park and Recreation Department to ensure that low- income families and children would be able to use the Edina Art Center, Aquatic Center and other park facilities. 0 O O I ARTs%r-'APE The Edina Community Foundation is currently raising funds for art and plantings for the new Edina City Hall. c,� CU1j �� • • 2 l J r Integrate public fine art into spaces. Build awareness and pride in community heritage and neighborhood identity. Encourage public interaction with an enjoyment of public places. 0 0 Provide opportunities for citizens, neighborhoods and groups to Work together. . Nurture the Creative environment in Edina and encourage local artiStlC endeavors. To meet these goals`and reflect the pride of living in Edina, the-Edina--Community--- Foundation is currently raising funds for public art and plantings for the new Edina City Hall. The Foundation is working with a group of residents to raise at least $100,000 for public art for the new Edina City Hall. The art will be installed in phases as money is raised. Projects envisioned include: OUTDOORS / An outdoor sculpture to create a welcoming space for people to gather. Construction of City Hall included -a basic landscape plan, but additional - seasonal plantings and amenities are-also needed to make the property stand out as a gateway to the community. CORRIDORS Pedestals for displaying small sculptures and pottery at the entrances to each City Hall department. In addition to displaying fine art, the pedestals would serve as a way to identifythe Administration, Assessing, Building Inspections, Engineering, Finance & Health, Park & Recreation, Planning and Police department office suites. In addition, the city's horticulturists have designed an interior plantscape to further beautify the building. OTHER PUBLIC AREAS Two -story fabric or stained glass panels to hang in the entrance of the new City Hall and various pieces of framed artwork for the public areas of the building. YES! I'd like to make a tax- deductible contribution to the City Hall Art Fund. = Please make checks payable-fo the Edina Community Foundation. Indicate in your check's memo - section that your contribution is for City-Hall art. Please deliver in person or mail your checks to: Edina Community Foundation 5280 Grandview Square Edina, MN- -55436 - -or Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 1MMA 10 ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP For more information, call the Edina Community Foundation, 952 - 833 -9573 Utility Bill Public Art Funding Proposal Funding for public art can come from a variety of sources; local government, public agencies, percent -for -art programs, individuals, corporations, and private foundations. Ideally the process of fund- raising should be simple, easy, accessible, cost efficient, and generally as painless as possible for all those involved. The Edina Public Art Committee unanimously recommends to the City Council either of two voluntary plans for accruing funds for public art via the Edina utility bill: $1 "check -off " for the Arts Include a $1.00 "check -off' for public art projects in the Account Summary of the bill. This could be done with each billing or have residents enroll for one year in a plan, which automatically adds $1.00 to the bill. (Avoids the problem of people forgetting to check or losing interest in the plan). With a hypothetical 20% participation rate, this plan would generate $4.00 /yr/household or approximately $16,800 /yr (20% of 21,000 households x $4) Or Round -up for the Arts l;: With this plan the utility bill is rounded up to the nearest whole dollar amount; the resulting "change" is then donated to public art. The city of St. Cloud (population 58,000) has been using this type of program successfully since 2001 and has raised over $17,000 for public art projects (participation rate = 11 %) With Edina's quarterly bill, the average donation/yr would be approximately $2.00 /participating household. Enrollment in either of these plans can be accomplished conveniently in a variety of ways: - Online enrollment via the city's web site (www.ci.edina.mn.us) - Enrollment cards mailed with the utility bill -Phone enrollment by calling the Utility Bill Division of City Hall (952 -927- 8861) Each of these plans has the advantages of being totally VOLUNTARY and EASY to execute with MINIMAL COST after the initial set -up is completed. EDINA PUBLIC ART COMMITTEE ROSTER L " "inda'Kieffer, Chair . all.kieffergatt.net (952)942 -7415 6809 Saint Patrick's Lane Edina MN 55439 -1632 rad_Benn BBenngci.edina.mn.us (612)915 -6604 Edina Art Center home 952- 922 -2280 4701 W. 64`h St. Edina MN 55435 Kris ten_Christianson KBCREALTORgyahoo.com 3622 County Rd 101 S. (952) 920 -6594 (H), (612) 616 -8591 (C) Wayzata MN 55391 Dick Crockett dcrockettng,mn.rr.com (952) 833 -9573 Edina Community Foundation 5280 Grand view Square Edina MN 55436 _iana Hedges . DHedg_eskci.edina.mn.us (612)915 -6603 Edina Art Center pager 612 -579 -6124 4701 W. 64`h St. Edina MN 55435 �Betty`Hemstad- RandBHemstadgaol.com (952) 922 -2690 4350 Brookside Ct Edina MN 55436 Linda_Masica - lmmasicagaol.com (952) 942 -6770 6817 Valley View Rd Edina MN 55439 -1647 thleen -(Kay) W— etherall KathWethgcg.net (9 52) 920 -6594 4350 Brookside Ct. Edina MN 55436 feat Greer WFGreer@aol.com 952- 941 -4086 7125Schey Drive Edina MN 55439 MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL MARCH 15, 2005 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson and Chair Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Masica and seconded by Commissioner Housh approving the Consent Agenda for the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR MARCH 1, 2005, APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Masica and seconded by Commissioner Housh approving the Minutes of the regular meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for March 1, 2005. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda, Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned. Executive Director O `\ -. -NA. City of Edina Certificate ofAcFiievement 'resented to VnitedProperties at Centennial'Lakes Office dark The City of Edina commends United Properties for its exceptional commitment to reducing traffic congestion by promoting commuting alternatives. James Hovland, Mayor Gordon Hughes, City Manager MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL MARCH 1, 2005 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh approving the Council Consent Agenda as presented with the exception of approval of the Regular Meeting Minutes of February 15, 2005. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. PROCLAMATION PRESENTED - "A PERFECT SHOW" Mayor Hovland noted that the Adaptive Recreation & Learning Exchange (AR &LE) offers opportunities for individuals with disabilities to actively participate in recreation, leisure and Community Education in Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Edina and Richfield. More than forty actors in the play were adults with physical or developmental disabilities and the goal was to provide an opportunity to participate in a theatrical production. He proclaimed Saturday, March 12, 2005, as a Day for the presentation of a musical, 'A PERFECT SHOW ", in Edina. MICHEL REVIEWED MINNESOTA MOVES AND INVITED ALL TO TOWN MEETING - Senator Geoff Michel explained the Minnesota Moves initiative in front of the legislature. He also invited the Council and citizens of Edina to attend the Legislators Town Meeting scheduled for 7:00 p.m. March 8, 2005 in the Edina City Council Chambers. *MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETINGS OF FEBRUARY 15, 16,18, AND 24, 2005, APPROVED Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh, approving the Special Meeting Minutes of February 15,16,18, and 24, 2005. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 15, 2005, APPROVED AS AMENDED Member Swenson asked removal of the Minutes of the February 15, 2005, meeting from the Consent Agenda for an amendment to her comments. Mayor Hovland added an addition to the Minutes and asked that they be re- submitted for approval at the next Council meeting. No formal Council action was taken. ACTION CONTINUED ON TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION POLICY UNTIL APRIL 5, 2005 Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered place on file. Fred Richards, Transportation Commission Chair, stated the Commission has spent the last twelve to fourteen months developing the framework contained in the Transportation Commission Policy. He reported the draft policy was adopted by the Commission on a six to one vote and noted the Commission in his opinion represented a cross section of Edina's population not only geographically but also demographically. He pointed out the policy was the toolbox needed to allow the Commission Page 1 Y Minutes/Edina Cif Council/March 1, 2005 a chance to work through some of the traffic issues facing Edina.. Mr. Richards stated the Commission recommended the Council consider adoption of the draft policy. Assistant Engineer. Lillehaug reviewed the draft Edina Transportation Commission Policy. He stated that in response to the traffic congestion problem the Council formed the Local Traffic Task Force to analyze traffic on local roadways in 2002 - 2003. Mr. Lillehaug said that one of the Local Traffic Task Force recommendations was to establish a committee to develop a framework to address the traffic problem.. Mr. Lillehaug reported the Council adopted an ordinance in December 2004 establishing the Transportation Commission. He quoted Edina Code Section 1225 which laid out the Commission's purpose and duties as follows: "1225.02 Purpose and Duties.. The Commission shall: A. Advise the Council on matters relating to the operation of the local street system with respect to traffic volumes, congestion, and functional classification, but not maintenance activities, of the City. B. Review. and comment on plans to enhance mass transit opportunities in the City. C. Review the findings of the Local Traffic Task Force and offer recommendations for implementation. D. Evaluate methods for traffic calming and other speed and volume mitigation measures and recommend their implementation where appropriate. ". Mr. Lillehaug stated the draft Transportation Policy included the following: • A framework to address traffic issues in Edina • Community standards and criteria to ensure process was objective He added that beyond developing the Policy, the Commissions duty would be to recommend measures :to the Council to address specific traffic issues in Edina. Mr. Lillehaug reported the Transportation Commission had taken the following steps in developing the policy. • At the direction of the Commission, staff began drafting the policy - April 2004 • Several iterations of review and revisions by the ETC occurred over the period of May 2004 to Jan 2005 • The ETC formally recommended the DRAFT on October. 28, 2004 to receive public comment • Dec. 9, 2004 - held public house on draft policy • Jan. 6, 2005 the Final Draft of the Policy was recommended by the ETC for Council consideration Joni Kelly. Bennett, 4003 Lynn Avenue, Transportation Commission member, filed a minority report. Ms. Bennett elaborated on the following points from her report: • The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) Policy was developed without knowledge of or attempt to assess community concerns and priorities. • The ETC Policy was developed without knowledge or attempt to assess how existing Edina Transportation Policy was or was not serving the City. • The ETC Policy conflicts with the Edina Transportation Plan and City of Edina Vision 20/20. • The ETC Policy fails to acknowledge the regional, national and international shift away from use of traffic calming for volume control toward use of traffic calming for speed control. • The ETC Policy fails to acknowledge the negative impacts of traffic calming on public safety. • The ETC Policy fails to acknowledge or protect the rights and interests of Edina residents who would be affected by traffic calming. • . The ETC Policy Neighborhood Traffic Management Program requires notice to too small a geographic area or group or residents. Page 2 Minutes/Edina City Council/March 1, 2005 • Measurement of traffic problems, public concern, and public approval of proposed solutions was too subjective. • The amount of agreement required advancing a study or test installation was completely inadequate. • The ETC Policy fails to inform the public adequately about functional street classification and the appropriate use of roadways. • The ETC Policy fails to recognize that traffic calming was no substitute for adequate City planning. Public Comment Robert Webb, 4516 Drexel Avenue, read a statement supporting the adoption of the proposed draft policy. Mr. Webb urged the Council to honor the work of the Transportation Commission by . adopting the draft plan and allowing the Commission to get on with their work. Jonathan Gross, 4208 Grimes Avenue, stated his objection to the policy. He reviewed his understanding of the purpose of the policy and stated the proposed draft policy did not meet the goals. Ron Williamson, 4300 Eton Place, suggested six minor changes to the proposed draft policy in writing. He urged the Council to be cautious to not pit neighbor against neighbor when implementing the policy. Kittie O'Dea, 4610 Bruce Avenue, stated the Transportation Policy was needed to deal with increased concerns about safety, not driver convenience. Ms. O'Dea submitted nine written questions and urged adoption of the policy. Marie Thorpe, 4506 Edina Boulevard, Transportation Commission member, commented it should be remembered that Commissioner Bennett's report was a minority report from one member of the Commission. She noted the Transportation Commission represented the majority viewpoint of the other six members of the Commission. Ms. Thorpe added the Commission consulted many resources while developing the policy and followed a process similar to other commissions. Maria Fesenmaier, 5713 Concord Avenue, representing the Edina Community Center Neighborhood Association, commended the efforts of the Commission and offered her suggestions for improvements to the draft policy. Jennifer Janovy, 4016 Inglewood, stated she had served on the Traffic Task Force. Ms Janovy asked what would take precedence when the proposed draft policy conflicted with the Comprehensive Transportation Plan. Ms. Janovy urged the Council to listen to the minority report and not adopt the draft plan without significant revision. Angela Berger, 4809 West 60th Street, stated she was a new Edina resident formerly of Minneapolis and she feared pitting neighborhood against neighborhood. She urged the Council to not draft a policy that would create this dilemma. Andrea Hoppmann, 4324 Coolridge Avenue, St. Louis Park, stated she, lived in the Browndale Neighborhood and expressed concern about the proposed policy notification area. She stated that she hoped to be notified of any traffic measures that would affect her neighborhood. Page 3 Minutes/Edina City Council/March 1, 2005 Elaine Bonn, 4382 Thielen Avenue, stated the traffic has increased greatly over the years. Ms. Bonn said she thought the proposed policy was a dichotomy of the minds. She felt the notice area should be expanded. Robert Knudson, 4375 Browndale, St. Louis Park, asked that his neighborhood be notified of any traffic calming affecting his neighborhood. Kelsey Smith, 4801 West 44th Street, stated that he believed that too few people could steer a neighborhood program, he had concerns with the proposed notification area and much concern about closure of streets. Council Discussion/ Action Member Housh asked Chair Richards to comment on the concerns expressed over the proposed notification area in the draft policy. Chair Richards stated he felt people were rushing to judgment about the notice area.. He said the Transportation Commission had considered several possibilities, but felt that the issue before the Commission would drive the area of notice. Far reaching issues would require notices to many more than a simple issue.. He added that in his opinion the City has typically notified more people than necessary rather than fewer. Mr. Richards continued stating that he believed people have been heard and that was really all that could be asked of government. The decision' when it has been made may not go the way the evening's speakers wished, but they have had the opportunity to. speak. He urged keeping a citywide perspective when considering the draft policy. Further, Mr. Richards suggested that if the Council did not accept the work of the Transportation Commission perhaps they should seat a different set of Commissioners to redo that work. Member Swenson asked if Chair Richards viewed speed and volume control notification as different. Mr. Richards replied he felt the City would err on a broader notification area, but that in his opinion volume control would have a broader impact. Member Masica commented that she felt a critical piece was missing and that was who would be reviewing new development/ redevelopment. Mr. Richards replied that the Planning Commission has worked well for many. years and that the Transportation Commission would also review traffic on development/ redevelopment requiring their attention when the level of the development/ redevelopment triggered a review. Member Housh made a motion to close the public hearing. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland ' Motion carried. Member Housh stated that he felt traffic to be the most contentious issue since he has been elected to Council. He stated he hated to see neighborhoods become the Hatfields and McCoys feuding over who has more needs. Member Housh suggested the Council consider adopting the proposed policy as drafted for a trial period. He added he felt it would be incorrect to not move ahead and let the Transportation Commission get on with their work. Member Housh made a motion to adopt the policy for a trial period of two years during which time no Neighborhood Traffic Management Plans would be looked at for either the Morningside or Country Club neighborhoods. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Swenson Nays: Hulbert, Masica, Hovland Motion failed. Page 4 Y Minutes/Edina City Council/March 1, 2005 Member Swenson suggested that the definition of cut- through traffic should match in the draft policy and the Vision 20/20 document. She noted the traffic was a regional issue pointing out Bob O'Brien had just informed the Council vehicle registration had increased over twenty-four percent in ten years. Member Hulbert stated she believed the policy should be reviewed and adopted when it was the best product possible. She suggested amending any divisive items at this time. Member Masica suggested the neighborhood frustration might be due to an unsolvable situation created by the regional traffic congestion.. However she agreed that there should be some review and tweaking of the draft policy. She expressed concern that perhaps the notification area needed to be different. Mayor Hovland thanked all the collaborators and agreed .the draft plan should be the best product possible. He said'he felt the policy was very close to the end product, but suggested taking some final written comments and postponing Council action until they could review the written comments and perhaps make some minor adjustments to the draft policy. This would allow the Council time to think more about the notice areas and other divisive components of the policy. Mayor Hovland stated he felt when the Council adopted the final plan no neighborhoods should be excluded from participation. Member Housh stated he felt this was not the best route to follow and that the Council should take action on the proposed plan and allow the Transportation Commission to get on with their work. Mayor Hovland made a motion to continue action on the proposed Draft Transportation Commission Policy until April 5, 2005, scheduling a special meeting to discuss potential revisions for 5:00 p.m. on March 8, 2005 and to receive written comments on the draft policy until 4:30 p.m. on March 8, 2005. Member Masica seconded the motion. Ayes: Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Nay: Housh Motion carried. *HEARING DATE SET OF MARCH 15, 2005, FOR AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - HAUGLAND COMPANIES (3901 - 3907 50TH STREET WEST AND 5000 - 5020 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH) Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh setting the hearing date of March 15, 2005, for an Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance and Conditional Use Permit for Haugland Companies, 3901 - 3907 50th Street West and 5000 - 5020 France Avenue South. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. * RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -18 APPROVING A LOT DIVISION FOR 6920 HILLSIDE LANE AND 5524 WEST 70TH STREET Member Masica introduced the following resolution and seconded by Member Housh and moved its approval: RESOLUTION NO. 2005-18 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A LOT DIVISION FOR 6920 HILLSIDE LANE AND 5524 WEST 70TH STREET WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land constitute two separate parcels: Lot 19, Block 6, LA BUENA VISTA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Page S Minutes/Edina City Council/March 1, 2005 AND Lot 18, Block 6, LA BUENA VISTA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the owners of the described land desire to subdivide and combine said tracts in to the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "parcels ") described as follows: PARCEL A: Lot 19, Block 6, LA BUENA VISTA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Except that part of the southerly 5.00 feet of the said Lot 19 lying the northerly extension of the east line of Lot 18, said Block 6. PARCEL B: ere t Lot 18, Block 6, LA BUENA VISTA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. eav4e-r Together with the southerly 5.00 feet of the Lot 19, said Block 6, lying wes#ertp the northerly extension of the east line of said Lot 18. I WHEREAS, the requested subdivision is authorized under Code Section 810 and it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said newly created Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the Edina City Code Sections 810 and 850; NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, that the conveyance and ownership of the above described tracts of land (PARCEL A and PARCEL B) as separate tracts of land are hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Code Sections 850 and 81- are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but only to the extent permitted under Code Sections 810 and 850 subject to the limitations set out in Code Section 850 and said Ordinances are now waived for any other purpose or as to any other provisions thereof, and further subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent Ordinances of the City of Edina. Adopted this 1St day of March 2005. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. ORDINANCE NO. 2005 -2 - AMENDING SECTION 1000 OF CITY CODE - CRIMES AND FORBIDDEN CONDUCT ADOPTED Mr. Hughes indicated that Ordinance No. 2005 -2 provides for the adoption of 'a trespass ordinance within the City Code. Violations of this Ordinance would be punishable as a petty misdemeanor. The City presently charges trespassers under Minnesota Statutes. Our City Prosecutor and the Police Department feel that it would be more appropriate to charge violators, pursuant to the City Code, when possible. Member Masica inquired what were the current penalties for a misdemeanor charge opposed to a petty misdemeanor. Attorney Gilligan responded that a misdemeanor charge was up to 90 days and $750.00 fine and with a petty misdemeanor it was issuance of a citation and a fine. Member Masica made a motion, seconded by Member Housh approving Ordinance No. 2005 -2 - Amending Section 1000 of City Code - Crimes and Forbidden Conduct as follows, with waiver of second reading: ORDINANCE NO. 2005-02 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1000 OF THE CITY CODE - CREUES AND, FORBIDDEN CONDUCT The City Council of the City of Edina ordains: Section 1. Section 1000 of the City Code is amended by adding a new Subsection 1000.14 as follows: 111000.14 Trespass. For purposes of this Subsection, the terms "premises ", "building ", "dwelling ", and "owner or lawful possessor" have the meanings given to them under Minnesota Statutes 609.605. For Page 6 Minutes/Edina City Council/March 1, 2005 purposes of this Subsection, the term " belief of property interest" shall mean a good faith belief that the person has a possessory interest in the property as an owner, tenant, lessee, licensee or invitee. A person who does not have a belief of property interest shall not: A. Trespass on the premises of another and refuse to depart from the premises on demand of the lawful possessor; or B. Occupy or enter the dwelling or locked or posted building of another, without consent of the owner or the consent of one who has the right to give consent, except in an emergency situation; or C. Return to the property of another within 30 days after being told to leave the property and not return if the person is without consent of one with authority to consent. Any person violating this Subsection upon conviction shall be guilty of a petty misdemeanor. Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon passage and publication. First Reading: March 1, 2005 Second Reading: Waived Published: March 10, 2005 Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -16 SUPPORTING HIGHWAY 100 IMPROVEMENTS Mr. Hughes informed the Council that recently the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) announced its intention to delay the reconstruction of Highway. 100 through St. Louis Park until 2014. It had previously been scheduled to be reconstructed in 2010. Staff was of the opinion that this portion of Highway 100 provides a significant bottleneck for safe and efficient travel on Highway 100. The bottleneck contributes to cut - through traffic in the northeastern part of Edina. Resolution No. 2005 -16 urges that MnDOT. reprioritize the reconstruction of this critical segment of the regional roadway system. Mr. Hughes said he would be participating in a panel held by Twin West Chamber. of Commerce regarding traffic concerns and business interests on March 11. On March 15, St. Louis Park was hosting a joint informational meeting for both St. Louis Park and Edina residents. Staff recommends adopting Resolution No. 2005 -16. Member Masica questioned whether funding was available for this project. Mr. Hughes reminded the Council that Senator Michel was presently sponsoring a bill on funding. He noted that the purported delay was due in part to the delay of federal dollars. MnDOT has explained that the project has not been re- prioritized and other projects were coming in ahead of it. One exception was the Lafayette Bridge, which was moved up the list because of structural problems. Member Swenson made a motion approving Resolution No. 2005 -16 Approving Highway 100 Improvements as presented. . Resolution No. 2005 -16 Resolution Supporting Reconstruction of Highway 100 and Opposing Delays in the Proposed Project Schedule Whereas, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDot) plans to reconstruct Highway 100 between 36th Street and Cedar Lake Road to expand the roadway to a six -lane freeway, replace the existing bridges to add an additional lane in each direction, rebuild the interchanges at Highway 7 and Minnetonka Boulevard, correct deficient bridge clearances, Page 7 Minutes/Edina City Council/March 1, 2005 improve drainage, address flooding problems under the railroad bridge, add water quality and retention ponds, add noise mitigation walls, and correct other deficiencies in the system; and Whereas, MnDot's 10 -year plan called for the reconstruction to begin in 2005, was rescheduled to 2010, and is again proposed to be rescheduled to start no sooner than 2014; and Whereas, the City of Edina believes Highway 100 improvements are essential to the economic vitality and the quality of life in our community and the region at large for the following reasons: • Originally built in the mid- 1930's, this section is part of the original beltway around the Twin Cities. Minimal work has occurred on this 2.1 -mile stretch of roadway over the last 60 years. • This segment is the last four -lane section remaining on Highway 100 and is one of the busiest and most congested four - lane freeways in the metro area. Traffic volumes on this segment were over capacity in 2001 and are only, getting worse. ■ Crash rates for this stretch of Highway 100 are second highest of all non - interstate roadways in Minnesota, with 25 percent of Highway 100 crashes occurring at the West 36th Street terminus. ■ Local neighborhoods in Edina and St. Louis Park are inundated with cars during peak drive -time hours. Cut - through traffic impacts the safety of our residents and their quality of life. ■ The estimated project cost is $80 million for construction and $7 million for right -of -way acquisition.. MnDOT has estimated that the delay to 2014 will increase project costs to at least $104 million. Now Therefore Be It Resolved, that the City Council of the City of Edina supports reconstruction of Highway 100 and opposes delays in the proposed project schedule. ADOPTED: the 1st day of March 2005. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ON -SALE INTOXICATING, CLUB ON -SALE AND SUNDAY SALE LIQUOR LICENSES APPROVED. Mr. Hughes presented a list of restaurants holding On -Sale Intoxicating, Club On -Sale and Sunday. Sale licenses which were recommended for approval. He explained that applications for renewal have been reviewed by the Edina Police Department. Paperwork has been submitted from all applicants in accordance with City Ordinances and State Statutes and license fees have been paid. Sidney's Restaurant license was conditioned upon receiving proof that tax delinquency issues have been resolved with the State of Minnesota. Mr. Hughes stated that one licensee, Ikasu Sushi Bar, had not completed necessary paperwork in time to be included with the other renewals and would be presented at a later date. Member Swenson inquired if liquor licenses for Edina were comparable to surrounding cities. Mr. Hughes said when other cities were surveyed; Edina was in the middle with licensing costs. Member Swenson asked when fees would be studied. Mr. Hughes said all fees were examined in the fall. Member Housh made a motion to approve renewals for the following: ON -SALE INTOXICATING AND SUNDAY SALE: California Pizza Kitchen, Eden Avenue Grill, Lakeshore Grill, Louis XIII, Maggiano's Little Italy, P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Romano's Macaroni Grill, Ruby Tuesday, Tejas, and The Cheesecake Factory; and Sidney's Restaurant conditioned upon tax issues being resolved Page 8 Minutes/Edina City Council/March 1, 2005 with the State of Minnesota; and CLUB ON -SALE and SUNDAY SALE: Edina Country Club, and Interlachen Country Club. Member Masica seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ON -SALE WINE LICENSE RENEWALS APPROVED Mr. Hughes presented the list of restaurants holding On -Sale Wine and On -Sale Beer Licenses recommended for approval. He noted that when establishments receive both an On -Sale Wine License and an On -Sale 3.2 Beer License, they might, per State Statute with. no further license, sell strong beer in their. restaurants. Mr. Hughes reported that all necessary documentation has been submitted for renewal, fees collected, and the Police Department has recommended renewal. Mr. Housh asked how often compliance checks were made on licensees. Mr. Siitari said that compliance checks were done twice annually with a decoy and uniformed officers do a walk - through monthly. Mr. Hughes noted that the same compliance checks were done at City facilities holding liquor licenses. Member Masica made a motion to approve issuance of ON -SALE WINE and ON -SALE 3.2 BEER licenses as follows: Alfred's Cafe, Beaujo's Bistro, Chapati, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Chuck E. Cheese's, D'Amico and Sons, Edina Grill, Good Earth Restaurant, Pizzeria Uno, Residence Inn Edina, Szechuan Star Restaurant, and Yorktown Cinema Grill. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. 3.2 BEER LICENSES RENEWALS APPROVED Mr. Hughes presented a list of applicants for renewal of their 3.2 beer licenses, both On -Sale and Off -Sale, All necessary documentation has been submitted for renewal, fees have been collected and the Police Department has recommended approval. Member Housh made a motion approving issuance of beer license renewals as follows: ON -SALE 3.2 BEER LICENSES: Davanni's Pizza/Hoagies, TJ's Family Restaurant; OFF -SALE 3.2 LICENSES: Cub Foods, Holiday Stationstore #217, Jerry's Foods, Speedway Superamerica LLC. Member. Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *RESOLUTION NO.. 2005-17 APPROVED FOR SOUND WALL CONSTRUCTION WITH MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, CITY IMPROVEMENT NUMBERS SA- 10, SA -11, SA -9 Member Masica made ' a motion, seconded by Member Housh approving Resolution No. 2005 -17 as presented: RESOLUTION NO. 2005-17 BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina, enter into Mn/DOT Agreement No. 87602 -R with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes: To provide for payment by the City to the State of the City's share of the costs for Vernon Avenue South, and noise walls No. 2, No. 3, and No. 5. construction and other associated construction to be performed upon, along and adjacent to Trunk Highway No. 100 from Excelsior Boulevard to 200 feet south of Minnehaha Creek within the corporate City limits under State Project No. 2734- 40(T.H.100 =005). . IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute the Agreement and any amendments to the Agreement. Page 9 Minutes/Edina City Council/March 1, 2005 Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Member Masica made a motion and Member Housh seconded the motion approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated February 17, 2005, and consisting of 29 pages: General Fund $394,098.76; CDBG Fund $10,700.00; Communications Fund $1,626.77; Working Capital Fund $98,086.15; Construction Fund $8,618.53; Art Center Fund $3,179.51; Golf Dome Fund $14,207.96; Aquatic Center Fund $115.16; Golf Course Fund $13,000.64; Ice Arena Fund $32,924.32 Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $30,367.92; Liquor Fund $110,456.29; Utility Fund $234,168.42; Storm Sewer Fund $15,100.07; PSTF Fund $26,040.00; TOTAL $992,690.50, and for approval of payment of claims dated February 23, 2005, and consisting of 28 pages: General Fund -$89,584.93; Communications Fund $8,678.05; Working Capital Fund $5,171.05; Construction Fund $3,310.54; Art Center Fund $17,454.60; Golf Dome Fund $1,962.97, Aquatic Center Fund $325.58; Golf_ Course Fund $7,196.16; Ice Arena Fund $3,746.53; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $8,077.84; Liquor Fund $176,769.18; Utility Fund $319,991.94; PSTF Fund $2,427.36; TOTAL $644,696.73. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 11:20 P.M. City Clerk Page 10. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL MARCH 15, 2005 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh approving the Council Consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 15, 2005, APPROVED AS CORRECTED Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh, approving the Corrected Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina City Council for February 15, 2005. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. RESOLUTION NO. 2005 - 21 ORDERING ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -326 - SUNNYSLOPE NEIGHBORHOOD Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered place on file. Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Member Masica to re -open the public hearing for Improvement No. BA -326 Sunnyslope Neighborhood Street Improvement. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Engineer Presentation Engineer Houle noted the public hearing for Improvement No. BA -326 Sunnyslope Neighborhood Street Improvement began on February 15, 2005. At that time the hearing was closed, but action continued to allow staff to further evaluate adding curb and gutter only where necessary due to the grade of the roadway and to re -survey the neighborhood regarding lighting preference. Mr. Houle noted staff also evaluated a third option replacing curb and gutter only in existing locations. Mr. Houle said that the Sunnyslope roadway and utilities were originally constructed in the 1940's. He said the existing roadways were: • Between 26 and 32 feet wide • Majority of streets without curb and gutter • Many properties have boulders and landscaping in the boulevard right -of -way causing problems with road maintenance • Roadways very deteriorated with potholes and edge patching • Drainage problems existed at roadways' edge. Mr. Houle said the neighbors were surveyed regarding the curb and gutter with 42 of 73 surveys returned. He reported of the 42 returned surveys, 29 respondents did not want curb and gutter Page 1 Minutes/Edina City Council/March 15, 2005 and 13 did want them installed. Mr. Houle said that three options could be considered in the roadway reconstruction project: • Option A: Install new concrete curb and gutter throughout neighborhood • Option B: Add new concrete curb and gutter only to specific areas, (erosion control >5 %, drainage issues <1 %) • Option C: Only replace curb and gutter in existing locations Mr. Houle explained the need.to remove the impediments that over the years have been placed within the City's boulevard rights -of -way. He displayed pictures of boulders and landscaping that in his opinion represented safety concerns of either a clear -zone problem or snowplow hazard. The Council discussed the survey results and reviewed the options presented with the possibility of constructing curbs from colored concrete, barrier removal (by whom and at whose cost), intersection configuration, potential alternatives to concrete curb and gutter included a slight build of bituminous and some potential soil stabilization. Public Comment David Lundstrom, 4912 Ridge Place, stated the statistics of survey respondents indicate that 29 did not want curb and gutter and only 13 wanted it. He asked that the street be reconstructed without curb and gutter. He also questioned whether or not decorative streetlights were wanted. Mr. Lundstrom stated he believed the neighborhood would be willing to pay for maintenance if it were necessary. Russ Fortner, 4920 West Sunnyslope Road, stated he was a twenty -nine year resident and requested that the City fix what needed to be fixed, but leave everything else alone. Mr. Fortner asked that the road width be left alone. He added that if future maintenance were necessary he would accept being charged. Mr. Fortner added he did not want decorative streetlights. Bruce Gustafson, 4808 West Sunnyslope Road, stated he did not want curb and gutter. He questioned why it was proposed for his property, which was flat. Mr. Houle explained that property with less than a one percent or more than a 75. percent grade needed curb and gutter installed to control water run off and erosion. Steve Makredes, 4916 West Sunnyslope Road, stated he believed that the wrong people were making the decisions on whether or not curb and gutter should be installed. He urged the Council to allow Engineering to make technical decisions, and not listen to personal preferences. Mr. Makredes said he feared the neighborhood would end up with a sub - standard product if the decision were based upon personal preferences. He also. recommended the City develop some citywide standards relative to street lighting. Bill Bailey, 4808 East Sunnyslope Road, stated he did not want curb and gutter installed, but also questioned why their neighborhood should have to pay any additional maintenance. Randy Moskahk, 4908 East Sunnyslope Road, stated that he felt residents were concerned about costs. He stated he felt the real issue was the assessment policy and suggested waiting to make a decision until the assessment policy had been developed. Page 2 Minutes/Edina Ci!y Council/March 15, 2005 Member Housh asked about the soils in the Sunnyslope Neighborhood. He said that after listening to the neighbors he was inclined to lean towards Option C installing the new street, but only replacing the curb and gutter in its existing locations. Mr. Houle replied the soils were sandy soils with a good sub grade. Member Swenson stated she agreed with Member Housh favoring Option. C. She added she would also leave the intersections alone. Member Swenson said she still believed the Engineer should be listened to and his technical expertise followed. Member Masica said she also would go along with Option C, leaving the sweeping intersection. She would like to see the streets' edges stabilized if possible. Member Masica questioned the possibility of leaving existing streetlights, but adding additional decorative lights. Mr. Houle said he believed the existing lights would need to be replaced with decorative lights if that was the choice for the installation. Mayor Hovland commented that this Edina neighborhood had a special rural feeling. He also favored Option C reconstructing the streets, but only replacing the existing curb and gutter. Mayor. Hovland also wanted the intersections left alone, but he added the impediments should be removed from the right -of -way as suggested by the Engineer. Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson to close the public hearing. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Masica made a motion introducing the following resolution and moving its adoption ordering Improvement No. BA -326, Sunnyslope Neighborhood Street Improvement as per Option C outlined above: RESOLUTION N0.2005 -21 ORDERING STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -326 SUNNYSLOPE NEIGHBORHOOD WHEREAS, the Edina City Council on the 181i day of January, 2005, fixed a date for a Council hearing on the proposed street reconstruction, Improvement No BA -326; and WHEREAS, ten days' mailed notice and two weeks' published notice of the ;hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon on the 151i day of March 2005, for Sunnyslope Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Improvement No. BA -326 reconstructing the existing bituminous pavement, installing decorative street lighting, replacing the existing curbs and gutters, replacing the existing watermain to the curb boxes, repairing the sanitary sewer where needed, extending the storm sewer and installing drain tile where needed at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully advised of the pertinent facts, does hereby determine to proceed with the construction of said improvement, including all proceedings which may be necessary in eminent domain for the acquisition of necessary easements and rights hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as Improvement Project No. BA -326 Sunnyslope Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Improvement Project No. BA -326 Sunnyslope Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction is hereby ordered as proposed. Page 3 Minutes/Edina City Council/March 15, 2005 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Engineer is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. The engineer shall cause plans and specifications to be prepared for the making of such improvement. Adopted this 151h day of March 2005. Member Housh seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -22 APPROVED GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FIRST READING FOR ORDINANCE NO. 2005 -03 AMENDING SECTION 850 ALLOWING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT IN PCD -1, 2 AND 3 DISTRICTS -. HAUGLAND COMPANIES - 3901 -3907 50TH STREET WEST AND 5000 -5020 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered place on file. . Presentation by Planner Planner Larsen informed the Council the proposed re- development consisted of. two parcels 3901 -3907 West 501h Street and 5000 -5020 France Avenue South. He explained the properties currently housed a number of retail stores fronting both France and West 50th as well as the Arby's site. Mr. Larsen said the total land area of the combined sites was 30,648 square feet. He noted the City owned a driveway easement on the west and north sides of the Arby's site. This drive currently provides access to store loading areas and a central garbage and recycling area. Mr. Larsen said the total floor area of existing stores was approximately 16,148. square feet. The proposed redevelopment would increase the retail floor area to 22,500 square feet or an approximate increase of 8,500 square feet. Mr. Larsen explained the subject .properties were within the 50th and France Avenue Redevelopment Plan area. He said the Plan identified certain sites for redevelopment at higher intensities, noting that Arby's was one of those sites. The subject site was identified for 30,000 square feet of office and retail floor area. Parking would be provided in the public ramps. He said that site was not specifically identified for redevelopment would be allowed to redevelop at a floor area of 1.0 relying on existing public parking. This would mean that under current plans and ordinance, the subject property could redevelop with a total floor area of 44,000 square feet of combined retail and office space. Mr. Larsen said the subject site, consisted of two parcels within, the southwest quadrant of the intersection of 50th and France. He said the properties were zoned PCD -2, Planned Commercial District and both were within the 50th and France Redevelopment Plan. The properties do not border other zoning districts so no setbacks would be required for new buildings. Mr. Larsen said the proponent was planning on demolishing all existing buildings on the site and replacing them with 22,490 gross square feet of retail at ground level. The proposal also would construct 23 condominium units on three levels above the ground level retail. He continued noting a below grade parking garage will provide 45 parking stalls with access through the City's ramp. These parking stalls would be for use �by condominium residents. The proposal would use the city parking ramp as path for ingress /egress to the parking garage across the alley. This will allow condo residents to cross the alley through the ramp at 90 degrees to avoid congestion with delivery trucks. Two on grade stalls will be provided on the site with opportunity for more on -street parking along France after elimination of the Arby's curb cut. Page 4 Minutes/Edina Ci!y Council/March 15, 2005 Mr. Larsen said the existing alley. from west 51st Street to France Avenue would remain in place with a slight adjustment in location to correct maneuverability. The trash area located along the alley will remain serving most of the block as a delivery service area. The new project has been designed to work with the existing route adding a loading area to reduce congestion and provide for customer pick -up. . Mr. Larsen said the proposed retail space complied with the 50th and France Avenue Redevelopment Plan and all Edina zoning standards for the PCD -2 zoning district. However, the PCD -2 district does not currently allow housing as a permitted use. He explained that housing has historically.. been part of retail nodes such as redevelopment so an amendment has been proposed that would add residential use as a Conditional Use in Planned Commercial Districts. Mr. Larsen said that residential uses would need to comply with the District's standards, but would be exempt from the floor area limit._ Residential use would need to provide private parking to support the project. Mr. Larsen reported the Planning Commission reviewed the proposal and recommended the Council grant first reading to the ordinance amendment adding residential dwelling units as a Conditional Use in the PCD -1, 2 and 3 districts; and Conditional Use Permit approval for C -05 -1, Haugland Companies with the following conditions: • Final adoption of the ordinance amendment • Conditional Use Permit to allow dwelling units in proposed redevelopment • Easements for public and private use • Watershed District permits Mr. Larsen introduced Gene Haugland the proponent to give greater detail of the project and answer Council's questions. Proponent Comment Gene Haugland, 5229 West Highwood, reviewed the proposed project, which would consist of retail space at ground level and residential condominiums on the second, third, and fourth levels. Mr. Haugland said that access to the site's underground through the City's parking garage was vital to the success of the project. He pointed out that the current trash collection site would be left alone to continue serving the tenants of the commercial area. Mr. Haugland said the project was slated to be constructed in two phases. The first phase would raze Arby's and construct 8,500 feet of retail with condos above. When this phase was completed the existing retail could move into the new area and the second phase of r razing the remaining retail and replacing it with new commercial and condo units would commence. He introduced Dan Young- Dixon, architect for the project to further describe details of the proposed project. Mr. Young -Dixon showed schematic drawings depicting the site and elevations of the project. He said the first level was slated to contain a variety of retail units; the second level would contain eight condo units, the third eight condo units and the fourth condo seven units. Mr. Young -Dixon said the building would be stepped back to maintain the view of the Edina Theatre. He added stepping back the residential units would provide the ability to have an outdoor deck area, and added to the safety of the units as well as the aesthetics. Mr. Young -Dixon added that a great deal of design detail had been given to the commercial portion Page 5 Minutes/Edina Ci!y Council/March 15, 2005 of the project to enhance the individual look of tenant. Additionally, Mr. Young -Dixon said the sidewalk width had been increased to enhance pedestrian safety. Jim Benshoof, Traffic Consultant, reviewed his February 16, 2005, memorandum studying the traffic on the site. He explained his conclusions that the proposed redevelopment could provide adequate operations within the site if the access arrangements outlined in his memo: 1) one -way northbound alley entry into the site from 51s' Street; 2) driveway on France that will allow exiting out of the site; 3) connection to the parking ramp opposite the entrance to the underground parking garage that will allow residents to use the ramp to enter and exit the site. Access gates restricted to the use of residents only would control the connection to the ramp. Mr. Benshoof concluded that based upon his study he had three principal findings: 1) the proposed redevelopment would not cause any negative impacts on France Avenue and at the France Avenue /50th Street intersection; 2) adequate parking will be provided to effectively meet the expected demand; and 3) satisfactory operations would be provided within the site. Member Housh asked staff to comment upon the benefit of a mixed -use development. He added he found the proposed project appealing. Member Swenson added that she understood the current request was for PCD -2 and questioned amending the code to include PCD -1 and PCD -3. Mr. Larsen said the mixed use development district have been successful since they meet a combination of needs in one location. He said all PCD Districts were included in the proposed amendment because this would be an opportunity. to return the residential use in combination with commercial use, which had been successful in past years. He noted that since it was a conditional use, any conditions deemed necessary. could be added to the permit, but that it would allow some urban redevelopment to take place. Member Masica stated the rendering shown was very nice, but expressed concern that the City would be guaranteed the final product matched the level of quality shown in the rendering. She added she also had concern with private use in a public parking structure. -. Mr. Young -Dixon replied that the proponent would need to have site approval before beginning the construction. Mr. Larsen explained that there would be cross easements in favor of the City governing use of the parking ramp. Public Comment Kittie O'Dea, 4610 Bruce Avenue, urged the Council to look critically at traffic at the 50th and France area and understand the implications before approving any redevelopment in the area. Richard Curtin, 6310 McIntyre Point, stated he owned the Ampersand Building. Mr. Curtin said that while he believed the commercial residential mix was a good thing, allowing that mix in this area would limit the use of his property. He said some very nice restaurants have been looking at his property, but that he was sure they would not be willing to locate next to residential. The restaurants he has been working with want rooftop dining and he did not think this would be possible due to noise regulations with residential property next to the restaurant. Mr. Curtin asked that if the Council approved residential housing for this area they also make it public policy that the residents must live with noise. Ron Williamson, 4300 Eton Place, stated that at the public hearing held on the draft Transportation Policy issues of traffic in the Country Club and Morningside neighborhoods Page 6 Minutes/Edina City Council/March 15, 2005 surfaced due to traffic from 50th and France. He asked the Council to not approve the proposed redevelopment until the traffic in the area has been rectified. Rob Webb, 4516 Drexel Avenue, stated he favored development, but the Council must preserve residential neighborhoods. He said the development at 50th and France in 1999 exacerbated congestion in the area. Mr. Webb asked how the increased traffic from the new development would be accommodated. Grethe Langeland - Dillon, 4530 Bruce Avenue, stated her professional address was 3925 West 50th Street, spoke as the 50th and France Business Association Chair. Ms. Dillon said she supported the re- development. Ms. Dillon said she believed the urban landscape would be an asset to Edina. Mick Fogelberg, 4632 Bruce Avenue, expressed concern with traffic in the 50th and France area and its impact on the surrounding residential areas. He questioned the numbers used in the traffic study and asked the issue be addressed. Mr. Fogelberg stated he disagreed with the previous speaker and was not in favor of the re- development. Marty Miller, 4527 Drexel Avenue, stated traffic is a problem. He said people were already using the ring road and that a real traffic study of the entire area needed to be completed before any further re- developments were approved. Jack Boyer, 4605 Arden Avenue, stated he felt what needed to be articulated was the safety of families should be considered when considering the re- development. Tom Bastings, 4617 Bruce Avenue, re- iterated the traffic concerns previously stated. He urged further study of the traffic before approving the re- development. Ralph Herda, 4501 Drexel Avenue, encouraged the Council to view this as an opportunity - not a development decision, but an opportunity to undertake a comprehensive traffic study. Jay Cameron, 4635 Casco, stated he loved the area, the ability to walk to 501h and France. He said he heard about the project and was excited about it re- energizing 50th and France bringing new life into the area. He urged the Council to look at traffic, but Mr. Cameron said in the long run he felt this would be a wonderful development. Member Swenson stated she was excited about the project and its opportunities for a different group of people to live in the 501h and France areas. She stated her intent to support the re- development. Member Housh stated his sympathy for the traffic concerns but pointed out the 500, and France area was a gem of Edina and the proposed re- development was a natural evolution. Member Housh said he felt the proposed redevelopment would bring a number of appealing opportunities to the community. Member Masica agreed the proposed redevelopment was an exciting urban option. She also expressed her sympathy for traffic in the area as well as some discomfort with the traffic study Page 7 Minutes/Edina City Council/March 15, 2005 submitted with the development proposal. However, she added in her opinion this was the best development submitted for this area. Member Hulbert agreed the re- development proposal was exciting. She pointed out that the proposal under consideration did not cause the traffic and perhaps it was time to address the issue. Member Hulbert suggested that perhaps a moratorium on future development could be an approach to allow comprehensive study of the traffic. Member Swenson asked if this was the last piece of property with re- development rights from the 501h and France Development Plan. She pointed out that the property could, according to the City's Development Plan, be developed with a higher density that the current proposal. Mr. Larsen stated that it was correct that this property was the last piece of property with re- development right. He noted that the redevelopment right did not extend to either the bank or the Ampersand building. Manager Hughes stated this would be the final piece implementing the re- development plan for the 50th and France area. He added if the City desired to update the plan that would be appropriate. Member Hulbert stated she did not think trading three parking stalls in the ramp for three on- street stalls was an even trade. Mr. Larsen pointed out that under the existing re- development plan the property could hold a 31,000 square foot building, but the proposal was 8,500 square feet, which would have a large effect on needed parking. Mayor Hovland stated he liked the mixed. use proposed by the re- development and favored amending the ordinance and commended Mr. Haugland for providing the mixed use opportunity for urban redevelopment. Member Masica inquired whether she should recuse herself from the discussion and final vote on the subject Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance and the Conditional Use Permit because of a family member being employed by the Opus Companies. Attorney Gilligan said there does not seem to be a conflict of interest. Member Swenson made a motion seconded by Member Housh to close the public hearing. Ayes:. Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Mayor Hovland made a motion to grant first reading to Ordinance No. 2005 -3 amending the Code of Ordinances by adding Residential Dwelling Units as a Conditional Use in the PCD -1, 2 and 3 Zoning Districts; and introducing the following resolution and moving its adoption with the following conditions: 1) Final adoption of Ordinance amendment; 2) Conditional Use Permit to allow dwelling units in proposed redevelopment; 3) Easement for public and private use; and 4) Watershed District permits. RESOLUTION NO. 2005-22 GRANTING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO HAUGLAND COMPANIES 3901 -3907 WEST 50TH STREET AMD 5000 -5020 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH WHEREAS, the procedural requirements of Code Section 850 (the Zoning Ordinance) have been met, and WHEREAS, it has been determined that the Findings as required by Code Section No. 850.04 Subd. 4 have been satisfied: Page 8 Minutes/Edina City Council/March 15, 2005 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby grants approval of a Conditional Use Permit to Haugland Companies, 3901 -3907 West 50th Street and 5000 -5020 France Avenue South, to allow dwelling units in the PCD -2 Planned Commercial District, with the following conditions: 1) Final adoption of Ordinance amendment; 2) Conditional Use Permit to allow dwelling units in proposed redevelopment; 3) Easement for public and private use; and 4) Watershed District permits Passed and adopted this 15th day of March 2005. Member Housh seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *BID AWARDED FOR AIR MONITORING EQUIPMENT AND SENSORS - FIRE DEPARTMENT Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh approving the award of bid for air monitoring equipment and sensors for the Fire Department to recommended low bidder, Compliance Training Services at $17,569.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR SELF - CONTAINED BREATHING APPARATUS (SCBA) AND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh approving the award of bid for Self- Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) and Support Equipment to recommended bidder, Clarey's Safety Equipment under Minnesota Fire Agencies Purchasing Consortium #NZ- 2004 -4 at $40,798.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR STORM SEWER REPAIR - PARKLAWN AVENUE AND FRED RICHARDS GOLF COURSE POND - ENG 05 -3, IMPROVEMENT NO. STS -305 Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh approving the award of bid for storm sewer repair at Parklawn Avenue and the Fred Richards Golf Course Pond, ENG 05 -3, Improvement No. STS -305 to recommended low bidder, Valley Rich Company, Inc. at $34,450.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. AWARD OF BID APPROVED FOR BRAEMAR PARK ATHLETIC FIELD RENOVATION NO. 05 -01PR Director Keprios indicated on February 24, 2005, bids were opened for renovation of the Braemar Park athletic field. Specifications were nearly identical to those used at the Lewis Park east, central and west athletic fields. Project Specifications: • Renovate athletic field (368' X 264') • Strip and salvage existing 5 - 6 inches of topsoil • Import 12 inches of new top soils • Three inches of sand for drainage layer • Nine inches of engineered sand /peat soils • Drain tile • Irrigation system • Construct eight new catch basins • One percent grade crown with laser guided equipment • Start June 1, 2005; substantial completion by August 1, 2005 Why a Sand/ Peat Field: Page 9 Minutes/Edina City Council/March 15, 2005 • Will withstand heavy use • Will be safe and lasting surface • Integrated Pest Management approach to turf maintenance • Playable shortly after rain • Safe surface preferred by athletes Veit Companies - excavating, grading, topsoil, irrigation, drain tile Turf Development - seeding, fertilizing, irrigation/ turf management Topographic survey Soil Borings /Soil Testing Landscape architect/ engineering fees TOTAL PROJECT COST $277,700 9,000 2,466 2,000 18,050 $309,216 Member Masica inquired who did the Lewis Park renovation. Mr. Keprios said the Frattalone Company and the Glenn Rehbein Company both worked on the Lewis Park renovation. Member Swenson asked if the size of the field would change. Mr. Keprios responded that the available land on the site would be maximized. Ms. Swenson inquired whether the site was still being considered for construction of a "bubble ". Mr. Keprios said no. Member Housh made a motion for award of bid for the Braemar Park Athletic Field Renovation No. 05 -01PR to recommended low bidder, Veit Companies at $277,700.00. Member Hulbert seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *BID AWARDED. FOR GOLF COURSE SPRAY VEHICLE FOR BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh approving the award of bid for a golf course spray vehicle for Braemar Golf Course to recommended low bidder, MTI Distributing Company at $43,763.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR 2005 POLICE UNIFORM CONTRACT Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh approving the 2005 uniform contract for the Police Department to recommended low bidder, Uniforms Unlimited at $8,852.75. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR TWO -1/2 TON CHEVROLET PICKUP TRUCKS FOR ENGINEERING Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh approving the purchase of two 1/2 ton Chevrolet pickup trucks for the Engineering Department to recommended bidder, Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet under State Contract No. 433478 at $30,349.16. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. MAY 10, 2005, SELECTED FOR GREATER SOUTHDALE AREA STUDY JOINT MEETING OF COUNCIL PLANNING COMMISSION AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Mr. Hughes suggested a meeting date be set for a joint meeting of the Council, Planning Commission and Transportation Commission for the Greater Southdale Area. Page 10 Minutes/Edina City Council/March 15, 2005 Following a brief Council discussion, May 10, 2005, was set for a joint meeting from 5:00 P.M. to 8:00 P.M. with the Council, Planning Commission and the Transportation Commission. No formal Council action was taken. ASSESSMENT POLICY CONSULTANT ENGAGED Assistant Manager Anderson indicated that staff held preliminary discussions with a consultant to review a proposed assessment policy that the Council had previously reviewed in their January and February work sessions. The consultant would study the benefit various priced residences experience from replacement of public improvements such as curb and gutter and road replacement. The study would cost approximately $15,000 - $20,000 and take sixty days to complete. During the study, staff will meet with neighboring City officials in order to gain a better understanding of their assessment funding policies. Results and a policy proposal will be before the Council when the research is completed. Funds for this study will come from the Contingency budget within the General Fund. Member Housh said this is a great idea and will help with decisions in the future. He asked if this should have been handled through a bidding process. Mr. Anderson said this is a highly recommended firm and is a professional service that does not require bids being sought. Member Masica stated her approval with any amount of information that can be gathered with such a complicated issue. Member Hulbert made a motion authorizing engagement of a consultant to review the proposed assessment policy as selected by staff. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. INTERSECTION RECONFIGURATION FOR VALLEY VIEW ROAD, OAKLAWN AVENUE AND WEST 62ND STREET APPROVED Engineer Houle explained the Council awarded the Valley View Road and Wooddale Avenue reconstruction project bid on July 6, 2004. Construction commenced in July 2004. Staff recommended safety improvements to the intersection of Valley View Road with Oaklawn Avenue and West 62nd Street. Council directed staff to further evaluate the intersection for alternate options. The intersection was evaluated by staff with four options; A) diversion of traffic and place a cul- de -sac at West 62nd Street; B) roadway easement needed - create a park -like entrance into the neighborhood, possibly requiring condemnation; C) diversion of traffic by closing off access from Oaklawn and W. 62nd on to Valley View Road; and D) poor definition of driver's right -of -way and maintaining it as it is. A traffic study was performed and a survey sent to area residents with four intersection options. As a result of the study, staff evaluated the intersection and created an alternate design that minimizes any diversion or change of the existing traffic pattern and helps define driver's right -of -way. Mr. Houle intimated that survey results were varied. After re- visiting the Council's request, staff combined Option B and Option D (now referred to as Option E) as follows: • Maintains a relatively standard T- intersection • Provides better definition of driver's right -of -way Page 11 Minutes/Edina City Council/March 15, 2005 • Provides safer pedestrian movements • Minimizes any change in existing traffic pattern or diversion of traffic • Does not require additional roadway. easements • Does not increase project cost Ms. Masica asked if STOP signs were considered in option E. Mr. Houle said there would be STOP signs at Oaklawn and West 62nd Street. Ms. Masica asked what the crossing distance would be at the reconfigured intersection. Mr. Houle responded Valley View Road would have a 32 -foot crossing. In the future, sidewalks would be proposed on either side of West 62nd Street. Ms. Swenson concurred with Option E as proposed. Resident Comment: Janie Weston, 6136 Brookview, previously at 6145 Oaklawn, voiced concern with Option E that does not allow enough traffic stacking room. The reconfigured T- intersection still makes the driveway at 6145 Oaklawn difficult to exit because of traffic. She stated that even if traffic were to double on Brookview it would still be nothing. She suggested Option A with the installation of a cul -de -sac. Mr. Houle said the . safest option would be the cul -de -sac but feedback from the neighborhood was negative for a cul -de -sac. He stated that Option E in his opinion is the best option. Becky Whitbeck, 6128 Brookview, indicated after considering Option E, she said it would be the best option. Member Housh made a motion approving and authorizing the reconfiguration of the intersection at Valley View Road with Oaklawn Avenue and West 62nd Street under Imp. No. BA -321. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica; Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. BOARD AND COMMISSION TERM LIMITS DECISION CONTINUED TO APRIL 5, 2005 Mr. Hughes noted on February 15, 2005, the Council received his report on the policies of neighboring cities with respect to term limits for Board and Commission appointees. After a brief discussion, Member Housh suggested continuing the Board and Commission term limits discussion/decision to the meeting of April 5, 2005, because of the late hour. Member Hulbert seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. INDIAN HILLS SUBDIVISION LAWSUIT DISCUSSED Mayor Hovland inquired of the Council whether a Closed Council meeting would be necessary to discuss the Indian Hills Subdivision lawsuit. Council consensus was that a Closed Council meeting was not necessary. Attorney Gilligan indicated that District Court rendered its decision with respect to Pederson vs. Edina last month. The Court upheld the validity of our subdivision ordinance and ruled in favor of Pederson as to the merits of his subdivision proposal. The Court also ruled that the moratorium imposed on subdivisions was not valid as to the Pederson matter. Unfortunately, the Page 12 Minutes/Edina City Council/March 15, 2005 Court's ruling as to the moratorium validity was ambiguous and could have been interpreted to apply to any subdivision application. The Council asked the Court to rectify the ambiguity and the Court agreed and issued language that clarified the invalidation of the moratorium applied to Pederson only. The City must now decide whether to appeal the Court's ruling concerning the Pederson subdivision by the middle of April. The decision as to an appeal must be made in public session. Member Masica made a motion not to appeal the Indian Hills Subdivision lawsuit. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *RESOLUTION NO 2005 -20 SETTING PUBLIC HEARING DATE OF APRIL 19, 2005, FOR ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS: NO. A -216 - SCHAEFER ROAD; NO. A -217 - SCHAEFER CIRCLE• AND NO. BA -328 - WEST 58TH STREET Member Masica introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2005-20 SET PUBLIC HEARING DATE OF APRIL 19, 2005, FOR ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS: NO. A -216 - SCHAEFER ROAD NO. A -217 - SCHAEFER CIRCLE NO. BA -328 - WEST 58TH STREET NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, that a public hearing shall be held on the 19th day of April, 2005, in the Council Chambers at City Hall at 7:00 P.M. to consider Improvement No. A -216 Schaefer Road from Interlachen Boulevard to Westwood Court; Improvement No. A -217 Schaefer Circle East of Schaefer Road; and Improvement No. BA -328 from Concord Avenue to Wooddale Avenue. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvements as required by law. ADOPTED this 15th day of March, 2005. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW OF TUESDAY, MARCH 8, 2005, APPROVED Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh approving the Traffic Safety. Staff Review for March 8, 2005, Section A: 1. "NO PARKING" restrictions for the north side of West 42nd Street from the intersection of Grimes Avenue to the east spanning 115 feet to the School's entrance; 2. Installation of a "NO PARKING ANYTIME" zone on the south side of West 7th Street from Highway 169 to Lincoln Drive; Section B. and Section C. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. GYMNASIUM UPDATE PRESENTED Mr. Housh explained that the Gymnasium Committee has received input from the user groups with many good ideas. One topic that was mentioned often was the utilization of parking on the site. He said some additional costs have been added to the project, many worthy and some mandated. The cost of the facility at present is under $5 million or up approximately 15% from the original estimate. Mr. Housh said the Committee should be before the Planning Commission in the very near future. Mr. Hughes said the timetable Page 13 Minutes/Edina City Council/March 15, 2005 would be approximately as follows: 1) a drawing could be forthcoming March 16, 2005, 2) a traffic and parking analysis has been completed, 3) the Planning Commission will hear the subject at their March 30th meeting, and 4) if the plan is approved by the Planning Commission, it would be before the Council on April 19, 2005. Director Keprios noted that the 'input committee' provided valuable information into the design and program stage. The plan was originally at $4.1 million to build the two buildings at 8,000 square feet. The square feet have increased to 10,000 and would include an elevator. He added that some of the costs could be value - engineered out of the final cost. Mr. Housh said the estimated time of completion of the project would be the summers of 2006. No formal Council action was taken. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Member Masica ,made a motion and Member Housh seconded the motion approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated March 2, 2005, and consisting of 21 pages: General Fund $320,154.28; Communications Fund $1,905.82; Working Capital Fund $3,846.95; Art Center Fund $1,620.49; Golf Dome Fund $316.52; Aquatic Center Fund $1,244.99; Golf Course Fund $2,108.71; Ice Arena Fund $21,485.26; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes. Fund $2,519.62; Liquor. Fund $126,176.27; Utility Fund $34,755.11; Storm Sewer. Fund $1,715.02; PSTF Fund $124.72; TOTAL $517,973.76; and for approval of payment of claims dated March 9, 2005, and consisting of 29 pages: General Fund $355,866.53, CDBG Fund $10,720.00; Communications Fund $14,606.40; Working Capital Fund $49,478.54; Art Center Fund $5,870.40; Golf Dome Fund $17,773.21; Aquatic Center Fund $73.87, Golf Course Fund $21,897.09; Ice Arena Fund $31,055.07; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $15,149.49; Liquor Fund $181,063.96; Utility Fund $23,444.26; Recycling Fund $33,874.00; PSTF Fund $2,664.63, TOTAL $763,537.45. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -19. APPROVED - CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON AN ISSUE OF REVENUE BONDS BY THE CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS' ON BEHALF OF FAIRVIEW HEALTH SERVICES ON APRIL 5, 2005 Attorney. Gilligan explained the City has received a request from Fairview. Health Services that the City consent to the issuance by the City of Minneapolis of tax- exempt revenue bonds under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.152 to 469.165, to finance the remodeling project of Fairview Southdale Hospital and to refund bonds previously. issued by the Minnesota Agricultural and Economic Development Board in 1997 and 2000, a portion of. proceeds of which financed improvements at Fairview Southdale. Approximately $35,000,000 of the principal amount of the bonds would be used to finance the proposed remodeling to be undertaken at Fairview Southdale Hospital. The debt service on the bonds would be payable solely from payments made by Fairview, and the City would not have any liability with respect to the bonds and would not be required to enter into any agreements with respect to the bonds. Fairview would pay all expenses. Mr. Gilligan said if the Council wished to proceed with the issuance of the bonds, a resolution setting a public hearing on the bonds should be set for the April 5, 2005, Council meeting. Mr. Housh noted that he is on the Board of Fairview Southdale Hospital and asked if he should be recused from the discussion and final vote. Mr. Gilligan indicated there would be no conflict of interest in the discussion and subsequent vote. Page 14 Minutes/Edina City Council/March 15, 2005 Ms. Masica questioned whether the reference to Fairview paying all City expenses was Edina or Minneapolis. Mr. Gilligan said it was Edina. Member Masica introduced the following resolution and moved its approval: RESOLUTION NO. 2005-19 CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEAIRNG. ON AN ISSUE OF REVENUE BONDS BY CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS ON BEHALF OF FAIRVIEW HEALTH SERVICES BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City), as follows: 1. Fairview Health Services, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation ( "Fairview "), has advised this Council of its desire to finance the remodeling of portions of Fairview. Southdale Hospital in the City, and the acquisition and installation of items of equipment therein and the refunding of the Health Care System'Revenue Bonds, Series 1997 (Fairview Hospital and Healthcare Services) and the Health Care System Revenue Bonds, Series 2000A (Fairview Health Services) of the Minnesota Agricultural and Economic Development Board with revenue bonds (the "Revenue Bonds ") issued by the City of Minneapolis under the authority of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 through 469.165. 2. Since the facilities proposed to be financed or refinanced by the Revenue Bonds are located in the City, Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and regulations promulgated thereunder, require that prior to the issuance of the Revenue Bonds, this Council approve the issuance of the Revenue Bonds by the City of Minneapolis, after conducting a public hearing thereon. A public hearing on the proposal that the City of Minneapolis issue the Revenue Bonds to finance the Project is hereby called and shall be held on April 5, 2005, of 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the City Hall. 3. The City Clerk shall cause notice of the public hearing, in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, to be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, once not less than 14 days prior to the date fixed for the public hearing. EXHIBIT A CITY OF EDINA 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES, SECTIONS 469.152 -.469.165 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City), will meet on April 5, 2005, at 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street, in Edina, Minnesota, for the purpose of conducting a public hearing on a proposal that the City of Minneapolis, Minnesota (Minneapolis) issue revenue bonds (the Revenue Bonds). on behalf of Fairview Health Services (the Corporation), in one or more series, under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 through 469.165, in order to finance the remodeling of Fairview Southdale Hospital, located at 6401 France Avenue South in the City of Edina, and the acquisition and installation of items of equipment therein, and to refund two series of bonds issued by the Minnesota Agricultural and Economic Development Board a portion of the proceeds of which financed improvements to Fairview Southdale Hospital and the acquisition of items of equipment therein. Fairview Southdale Hospital is owned and operated by the Corporation. The maximum aggregate principal amount of the proposed Page 15 Minutes/Edina Ci!y Council/March 15, 2005 Revenue Bonds to be issued to finance the remodeling to be undertaken at Fairview Southdale Hospital is $35,000,000. The Revenue Bonds will not be issued by the City. All persons interested may appear and be heard at the time and place set forth above, or may file written comments with the City Clerk prior to the date of the hearing set forth above. Dated: March 15, 2005. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Debra Mangen, City Clerk Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. JOINT MEETING WITH THE EDINA PUBLIC ART COMMITTEE DATE/TIME SET Mr. Hughes suggested the Council and the Edina Public Art Committee set a joint meeting for April 5, 2005, at 5:30 P.M. in the Community Room. No formal Council action was taken. REMINDER - BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS ANNUAL MEETING Mr. Hughes reminded the Council of the Annual Meeting of the Boards, Commissions, Committees to be held March 29, 2005, at 5:00 P.M. at the Centennial Lakes Park Centrum. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 11:00 P.M. City Clerk Page 16 MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL ON MARCH 8, 2005 AT 5:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Also attending the meeting were Transportation Commission members Bennett, Plante, Thorpe and Chair Richards. Mayor Hovland explained the purpose of the meeting was to review the proposed draft Transportation Policy and make revisions to the document. The Council and Commission conducted a page -by -page review of the draft policy suggesting possible changes ending on page nine and set another special meeting for Monday March 14, 2005, at 5:00 p.m. Issues discussed included delineating the difference between the existing Transportation Plan in the City's Comprehensive Plan and the Transportation Commission Policy, inclusion of the term cut-through traffic, language considering pedestrians and bicyclists when streets were redeveloped, and timing of Transportation Commission review of developments/ redevelopments. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, the Mayor adjourned the meeting at 6:55 p.m. City Clerk MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL ON MARCH 14, 2005 AT 5:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Also attending the meeting were Transportation Commission members Bennett, Plante, Thorpe and Chair Richards. Mayor Hovland explained the purpose of the meeting was to continue the review of the proposed draft Transportation Policy begun on March 8, 2005. The Council continued their review of the draft Transportation Commission Policy. It was agreed that Mayor Hovland would submit his redline copy of the draft policy to City staff for distribution. One major change was in the needed percentage of responses of a petition to study. Consensus was that when a Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan was received and neighborhood survey conducted, moving forward would require a 51 percent return with 65 percent of the returned surveys supporting the project. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, the Mayor adjourned the meeting at 8:00 p.m. City Clerk MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL ON MARCH 15, 2005 AT 5:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Hulbert, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Mayor Hovland explained the purpose of the meeting was to receive training required by Minnesota Statutes for their work as the City's Board of Equalization. Assessor Wilson conducted the training of the Council as required by Statutes. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, the Mayor adjourned the meeting at 7:00 p.m. City Clerk .;r- CONSENT ITEM II. B. LOCATION MAP Case Number: LD -05-3 Location: 6016 -6020 Berne Circle Request: Party Wall Lot Division Draft Minutes PC Meeting March 30, 2005, 7:00 PM LD -05-3 Robert and Rebecca Prasclunas 6016 -6020 Berne Circle Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the proponents are requesting a party wall lot division of an existing double bungalow. Mr. Larsen stated the property meets all requirements for division with separate utilities provided. Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends party wall lot division approval. Commissioner Lonsbury moved to recommend lot division approval. Commissioner Fischer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Regular Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, March 30,2005,7:00 PM Edina City Hall Council Chambers 4801 West 50th Street Staff Report Case Number: LD -05 -3 Location: 6016 -20 Berne Circle Owner: Robert and Rebecca Prasclunas 6016 Berne Circle Zoning: R -2, Double Dwelling Unit District Request: Party Wall Lot Division of existing double bungalow. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval. The property meets all requirements for division. FRANK R. CARDARELLE Land Surveyor °. 941 -3031 Eden Prairie, IVIN55344 Survey or Robert Prasciunius Book Page File 5808 6016' Berne Orc e Edina, MN • bpd �� + ' Scgle s .1" =30' P '0 0 � i �N a I / pry so, Lft 6016.;Berne Circle Lot 3 dx rapt that.: pa described as fol.lowe z That;, „pa -of Lot 3 lylnq -46: tbWoi s rly. of a -lire- descxil;ed 4s running from,:a oirit in the'' 44''t Tine of s id Lpt 3 distant 147.0 9eet Ngrth' of th Southwest, cazner thereof, t a point in the Southeagterly lir 31.5 eet Nortt;aa'a r 4WIy from jt�h�ej��m st Southeasterly corner 4fi said Lot, '_ lra a tiJi ruigc�o�r`recl� e�xeeanlallon d aiu`�neyai tDhs baiu�d ' d Hennepin County. Minnesota and of the location of all wilding • n. d all viable sneroaahmenta. it any. Irom or on said land. Swrevsyed by Mau 21 S t d w a March,, 2005 04/01/2005 14:11 9528935460 GIBRALTAR TITLE 1 3030• A 12.41PM• PAGE 02 Sent By: FRANK R CARDARELLE; 952 -94 - , Page 2/3 - ' Land Surveyor FRANK R. GARDAREL.LE Eden Prairie, MN 55344 941 -3031 Survey For Robert P r a s c i u n i u s Book PEsge Flle 5808 0 Berne C r.c e Edina, TAN 15$x. LAC ' O' A �► ..15 �C ti 'r 4. ILL 0z¢ . 603..E ]Berne Circle Sole : a " =30 ' 2-019 Nw- this Lot 3 a�x�q@I that..part deacribad all followo m TYsaiw;:.,p$rt 'Of Lot 3 1 � ,S.cautr►aor ®sterly of a lira des 161.0 feet zNort s . from•: a point in the apt 11 nee of said Lai: 3 In the 107,0 te ]a7olin of the Southwaat •cx =6V thereof, t+a a poi nir ir► the SouthaQa t fz$oldin�r 31.5 feet Hcrt eas"r,'Iy from the most Southeasterly co�C" +� 3 a 1 �n 9' oc�it .. D CiCAS AdD Lott' � �hwu% w+.nd'eaneoi�.ww.e.m« a a,w.sy 00 as measured along said Gwnly. M`nrwnaa and d.h. ��O^ W wWbi ^o}J ! !� Southeasterly line list d+o rc 2Q05 1. .wb...awduMM..l�.er. Re Y- 3 3%"�% ri' •,c 04/01/2005 14:11 9526935460 GIBRALTAR TITLE PAGE 03 Sent By,- FRANK R CARDARELLE; 952- 941 -3030; Apr -1 -05 12:40PM; Page 1/3 - Land Surveyor FRANK R. CARDARELLE Eden Prairie, MN 55344 941 -3031 ottr at iza % f ur Survey For R n h P r P r a sci Book Page_ File 5! 8 8 6020 Berne Circle Edina. MN 5* x... �. SF!TP y ��� r 114 J. e6 f e-p V a4 tZ. 4e 1 _ ---- - 1 scales 1" =301 60 20 Be rneii Circle `• 2eg�Fxpa on: Thst part o� Lot 3 lying Southeasterly of v* line described am r..urflp�nc3 from a point In the West UPS of said Lat 3 $iatsnt 7.07.0 t ® ®t NO��h of the southwest corner thereof, to Fa point In the BoutheostorliF linO 31.5 feeti Northeasterly from the Most southeasterly corner of 0-4d Lot 3 10x11 'in Block 1, DECKAS ADDXTION k as measured along said Southeasterly line I hereby cWtHY 0441 this Ia a 11" and aorrem reprosen0adun of o survey of the boundarioa at above rcjj-gc ribO4 .. ps' r M y Mennopin County. Mkn ote and 01 the Ippalbn el aU bu' 'Yeoq. and as vNmle enwow*rneehl, 11 any. 4orn or a1 nail Land. 8ureveyed by mo 14i. 21 S _daY d M a r c h ,. 2 0 0 5 ✓,3.31_ar �� 0, To: Mayor & City Council From: Craig Larsen City Planner Date: ,April 5, 2005 ° REPORT/RECOM M EN DATION Subject: Wallingford Properties - 5101 70 Street West Recommendation: No Council action required. Agenda Item: u. C. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Information /Background: The City Council approved a rezoning to allow redevelopment of this site with a 106 -unit development on July 20, 2004. The plans illustrated a 74 -unit rental building and a 32 -unit condominium building. At this time construction has not commenced on either building. The owner of the 72 -unit site, Vasco Bernardi, has asked to appear before the Council to give an update on the project, and suggest possible changes to the approved . plans. The changes could include an increase in the number of affordable units, an increase in total unit count, and some level of public assistance for the project. Details of the plans and financing will be presented at the Council meeting. a ® To Council Action: ❑ Motion. ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ® Discussion Information /Background: The City Council approved a rezoning to allow redevelopment of this site with a 106 -unit development on July 20, 2004. The plans illustrated a 74 -unit rental building and a 32 -unit condominium building. At this time construction has not commenced on either building. The owner of the 72 -unit site, Vasco Bernardi, has asked to appear before the Council to give an update on the project, and suggest possible changes to the approved . plans. The changes could include an increase in the number of affordable units, an increase in total unit count, and some level of public assistance for the project. Details of the plans and financing will be presented at the Council meeting. a o e �y REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor Hovland and Members of the City Council FROM: John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: April 5, 2005 AGENDA ITEM III. A. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Kojetin Park Playground Equipment Compan y Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Koohno Construction, Inc. I. $ 107,815.00 2. Arrigoni Brothers Company 2.$ 113,851.50 3. BCG Construction 3. $ 114,700.48 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Account #: 47039.6710 Koolmo Construction, Inc. $107,815.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This is for the purchase and installation of new replacement playground equipment at Kojetin Park per specifications. On Tuesday, March 22, 2005, bids were opened for the purchase and installation of replacement playground equipment at Kojetin Park. Assistant Director, Ed MacHolda, worked closely with a Kojetin Park neighborhood committee in selecting the playground equipment and design. The committee visited playground sites and viewed catalogs from various playground equipment vendors. The committee chose Columbia Cascade's playground equipment, TimberForm2, which is the same playground equipment installed at Rosland and Normandale Park. As shown on the attached drawing, the new playground equipment will have 4 swings and a variety of slides, climbers, a tire swing, and resilient wheelchair accessible safety surfacing to the play structure, concrete apron, and drain tile. Park Maintenance staff will remove and dispose of the old playground equipment, which was installed in 1991. This project is funded by the capital improvement plan, which was budgeted at $110,000. If approved by the City Council, the new Kojetin Park playground equipment will be installed no later than July 1, 2005 This Recommended bid is within budget Edina Park and Recreation Department not within We Director o e v � .by •j loss • REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor Hovland and Members of the City Council FROM: John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: April 5, 2005 AGENDA ITEM III. B. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Jacobsen HR -9016 Rotary Mower — Park Maintenance Department Compan y Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Carlson Tractor Company 1. $52,609.00 2: (State Contract #434108) 2. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Account #: 1650.6710 Carlson Tractor Company $56,609.00 (plus sales tax) GENERAL INFORMATION: This is for purchase of a 2005 Jacobsen HR -9016 Rotary Mower for the Park Maintenance Department. This new rotary mower replaces a 1992 Toro model 580 -D Rotary Mower #47.451. The $52,609.00 cost includes the $8,500 trade -in allowance for the 1992 rotary mower. This new Jacobsen rotary mower cuts a grass swath 16' wide and is used primarily for all large grass areas, including athletic fields, for all parklands west of Highway 100. Alternate bids are not required because it is being purchased under the State Contract #434108, which is currently the most competitive price available. This purchase is funded under the Maintenance John Keprios! Director This Recommended bid is within budget Edina Park and Recreation Department not within budget a n, ffn_Tnce Director Manager o e �o REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Teas TO:- - Mayor Hovland and Members of the City Council FROM: John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: April 5, 2005 AGENDA ITEM: III. C. ITEM DESCRIPTION: 3/4 Ton Pick -Up Truck — Park Maintenance Department Company Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet (State Bid Contract #433478) RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet $18,404.90 Amount of Quote or Bid 1.$18,404.90 Account #: 1650.6710 GENERAL INFORMATION: This is for purchase of a new 3/4 ton 4X4 Chevrolet regular cab pick -up truck with a trailer tow package and snowplow preparation package for the Park Maintenance Department. This vehicle replaces a similar 1996 Dodge 4X4 pick -up truck #47.280 that is used by the mowing crew and for snowplowing. The new vehicle is purchased under the Minnesota State contract bid #433478. Funding for this vehicle is under the equipment replacement budget. The new vehicle comes factory painted dark green color with a cloth interior. The 1996 Dodge will be sold in the public auction. t John WKepoZ,ector This Recommended bid is within budget not wit] Edina Park and Recreation Department o e� v @:� - �O • rNroRBpORA�E9 • AGENDA ITEM: DATE: III,D. March 31, 2005 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: CHIEF MICHAEL SIITARI VIA: GORDON L. HUGHES, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 ITEM DESCRIPTION: 11 P -90 Carbines, Accessories & Ammunition COMPANY BID AMOUNT 1. Streichers Police Equipment 1. $42,550.00 2. 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. RECOMMENDED BID: Streichers is the sole source for the manufacturer in the Upper Midwest. GENERAL INFORMATION: The carbines would replace the surplus military rifles (M- 16s) the Emergency Response Team currently uses. A private donor has covered the entire cost of the transition to the new weapons, including ammunition and all accessories. V�nr� POLICE V. Signature Department The Rec m de is (within budget) (not within budget) GoraoG L. Hughes, i anager J n Wallin, Finance Director TO: Mayor & City Council REQUEST FOR PURCHASE FROM: Wayne D. Houle, P.E., Director of Public Works. VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15.000 DATE: April 5, 2005 AGENDA ITEM III. E. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Commodities Purchase - Sand, Rock, Bituminous Materials, Concrete & Engine Oil, and Water Treatment Chemicals. Company 1. See Attached Tabulation. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Award to companies as listed on attached page. GENERAL INFORMATION: Amount of Quote or Bid 1. See Attached Tabulation This is the bid establishing the prices for certain materials used in public works projects. The prices are firm for a period of one year (April 1, 2005 to March 31, 2006). The funds for the purchases come from the money allocated to the operating section of the budget (1300, 1500, and 5900 accounts). Prices of previous year are compared where applicable. /' � J�ez - A Si nature The Recommended Bid is within budget not within Public Works Department Hughes, CityMhQger Director 2005 COMMODITIES BID RESULTS: SAND, ROCK, BITUMINOUS MATERIALS, CONCRETE, PROPANE, ENGINE OIL, and WATER TREATMENT CHEMICALS BID ITEM NO UNIT ITEM COMPANY 2005 2004 Comparison Of % +Or- 1 Ton Deliv. Coarse Sand SA -AG $ 6.45 5.42 19.00% 2 Ton Deliv. Cl. 2 Limestone Midwest As halt Rec cle Mat $ 10.50 10.97 - 4.28% 2 Ton Deliv. CI.2 Limestone Alt Bid _Bryan Rock New Mat $ 11.60 10.97 5.74% 3 Ton Deliv. FA -2 Seal Coat Chips Dresser Trap Rock $ 28.80 25.70 12.06% 4A *Ton Asp halt 2331 Base Type 31 or 32 Midwest Asphalt - Del $ 32.60 30.50 6.89% Midwest Asphalt - PU $ 27.60 23.501 17.45% Alt Bid Bitmunious Roadways - Del $ 35.00 31.35 11.64% Alt Bid Bituminous Roadways - PU $ 27.50 27.35 0.55% 4B *Ton As halt 2331 Base Type 41 or 42 Midwest Asphalt - Del $ 33.75 32.00 5.47% Midwest Asphalt - PU $ 28.75 24.50 17.35% Alt Bid Bituminous Roadways - Del $ 37.00 32.50 13.85% Alt Bid Bituminous Roadways - PU $ 29.50 28.50 3.51% 4C *Ton As halt 2331 Wear Type 41 or 42 Midwest Asphalt - Del $ 32.75 31.00 5.65% Midwest Asphalt - PU $ 27.75 2330 18.09% Alt Bid Bituminous Roadways - Del $ 35.50 31.50 12.70% Alt Bid Bituminous Roadways - PU $ 28.00 27.50 1.82% 4D *Ton Asphalt 2331 Wear Type 31 or 32 Midwest Asphalt - Del $ 33.50 32.00 4.69% Midwest Asphalt - PU $ 28.50 24.50 16.33% Alt Bid Bituminous Roadways - Del $ 37.00 32.25 14.73% Alt Bid Bituminous Roadways - PU $ 29.50 28.25 4.42% 4E Ton lAsphalt 2360 Midwest Asphalt - Del $ 33.75 0.00 New Item Midwest Asphalt - PU $ 28.75 0.00 New Item Alt Bid Commercial Asphalt - PU $ 33.40 0.00 New Item 5 CY Delivered Concrete 3+ Yds. Ag Ind./Eagan $ 80.65 78.65 2.54% 6 Gal. Emulsified Asphalt CRS2 Marathon Ashland $ 0.7390 0.75 -1.47% 7 Gal. Emulsified Tack Oil Bituminous Roadways $ 26.00 24.00 8.33% 8 Crack Joint Sealer Bar en $ 0.332 0.35 -5.14% 9A H drofluosilicic Acid DPC Industries $ 9.03 9.55 -5.45% 9B H drofluosilicic Acid DPC Industries $ 9.03 9.55 -5.45% 10 Liquid Chlorine DPC Industries $ 36.20 32.33 11.97% 11 Pol Water Treatment Chemical (Poly)' DPC Industries $ 4.35 5.25 - 17.14% 12 Caustic Soda DPC Industries $ 28.06 53.00 - 47.06% 13 A,B & C 14 Jbidders Manhole Covers - Complete Castin Red Ball Aggregate Ess Brothers & Sons, Inc. B an Rock $ 764.00 $ 15.72 705.00 14.87 8.37% 5.72% 15 Lannon Stone Wall Repair Bork Stone $ 16.25 16.25 0.00% e items are awarded on basis of total cost er ton incl. truckin & labor and ast e a summation of bids taken for commodities used b Public Works and Parks. T icall , there are one to four on each item. The as halt bids are alwa s awarded with an alternate lant site sin le asterisk because of ed to continue using asphalt during the summer and plar' -rloading or shut down does occur every summer. TO: Mayor & City Council REQUEST FOR PURCHASE FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, City Engineer VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: April 5, 2005 AGENDA ITEM III. F. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Contract No. ENG 05 -1, Valley View Road Lighting Project, Improvement No. L -42. Company 1. LPD Electric, Inc. 2. Killmer Electric 3. Quality Underground 4. Vinco, Inc. 5. Electrical Installation 6. Collins Electrical Systems 7. Granite Ledge Electrical 8. Egan Companies 9. Honda Electric RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: LPD Electric, Inc. GENERAL INFORMATION: Amount of Quote or Bid $ 97,160.00 $ 98,965.00 $ 114,290.00 $ 114,565.00 $ 116,947.00 $ 118,000.00 $ 123,500.00 $ 125,749.00 $ 139,700.00 $ 97,160.00 This project is for decorative pedestrian streetlights along Valley View Road from TH62 to Wooddale Avenue. A project hearing was held on April 7, 2004, that included the streetlights with the roadway project. This segment of the Wooddale Avenue / Valley View Road project is the final phase and is scheduled to resume construction late April. This project will be funded using Municipal State Aid System funds and special assessments. The Engineer's estimate is $131,000.00. Staff recommends awarding this project to LPD Electric. Signature The Recommended Bid is within budget not withi Public Works - Engineering Hughes, City Director REPORURECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: s-;-Steven L. Lillehaug, PE, PTOE Information Only Traffic Engineer Date: April 5, 2005 Subject: Adoption of the Transportation Action Commission Policy Agenda Item # W.A. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Adopt the City of Edina Transportation Commission Policy dated April 2005. Info /Background: The City Council held a public hearing on March 1, 2005 to take public comment on the final draft of the Transportation Commission Policy. After two work sessions with the City Council and Transportation Commission, a revised version of the final draft has been completed and is being presented to the City Council for further consideration (see attached). G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure\ Streets\ Traffic \Transportation Commission\Agendas \report- recommendations\rr to CC 4- 5-05.doc CITY OF EDINA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION POLICY 49j O�� April 2005 • • -Edina Transportation Commission recommended the FINAL DRAFT on January 6, 2005 for City Council consideration. -Edina City Council action taken on { CITY OF EDINA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION POLICY April 2005 Contributors: Mayor & City Council Mayor James Hovland Councilmember Scot Housh Councilmember Alice Hulbert Councilmemeber Linda Masica Councilmember Ann Swenson Transportation Commission Joni Kelly Bennett Dean Dovolis Warren Plante Fred Richards (Chair) Marie Thorpe Les Wanninger Jean White Steven L. Lillehaug, P.E., P.T.O.E., Traffic Engineer /Assistant Engineer Wayne D. Houle, P.E., Public Works Director /City Engineer City of Edina Engineering City of Edina Transportation Policy i April 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS TitleSheet .......................................................................... ............................... i Tableof Contents ............................................................... ............................... ii I. INTRODUCTION 1 Background........................................................................ ............................... 1 Purpose.............................................................................. ............................... 1 Vision................................................................................. ............................... 1 II. POLICY FRAMEWORK 1 Introduction........................................................................ ............................... 1 City of Edina Transportation Commission Policy ............... ............................... 6 III. PLAN IMPLEMENTATION 6 Transportation Commission Policy Adoption ..................... ............................... 6 ActionPlan ......................................................................... ............................... 7 Sources of Funding ......................:..................................... ............................... 8 Plan Acceptance Requirements and Costs ........................ ............................... 8 IV. NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLANS ("NTMP ") 8 Introduction........................................................................ ............................... 8 Process and Schedule ....................................................... ............................... 9 NTMPProcess ................................................................. ............................... 10 Criteria for Screening .................................................... ............................... 13 Scoringfor Ranking .......................................................... ............................... 14 Removal of Traffic Management Devices /Measures ....... ............................... 15 Traffic Management Devices /Measures — City of Edina Approved Options.... 16 Benefited Area (Assessed Area) ......................................... .............................17 APPENDICES Appendix A — Definitions Appendix B — Traffic Management Devices / Measures Appendix C — Application Request for Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan Appendix D — Acknowledgments and References Appendix E — Functional Classification Road Map City of Edina Transportation Policy ii April 2005 I. INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND Sustaining, improving and operating a sound street and transportation system are integral parts of the long -term vision of the City. Congestion on the regional roadway system and the failure of that system to accommodate the continued growth in traffic volumes has both created and exacerbated traffic volumes, speed and congestion on local streets. These conditions adversely affect the quality of life of the City's residents and the activities of the businesses located in the City. The Edina City Council in December 2003 established the Transportation Commission to address these issues and to work to improve the local transportation system, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Vision 20/20. PURPOSE The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) was established to advise the Council on matters relating to the operation of the local street system with respect to traffic volumes, congestion, and functional classification, but not maintenance activities, of the City; to review and comment on plans to enhance mass transit opportunities in the City; to evaluate methods for traffic calming and other speed and volume mitigation measures and to recommend their implementation where appropriate; and to review the findings of the Local Traffic Task Force (2002 -2003) and offer recommendations for implementation of those findings. VISION Edina will maintain a transportation system that will accommodate the efficient movement of people and goods throughout the City while fostering safe and livable neighborhoods and business areas connected by aesthetically beautiful, pedestrian and bicycle friendly streets and pathways. II. POLICY FRAMEWORK INTRODUCTION The Edina Transportation Commission Policy ( "Policy") was developed as a supplement to the City of Edina Transportation Plan (March 1999). The purpose of the Policy is to guide the ETC in the identification and evaluation of traffic and transportation issues in the community and prioritize projects and improvements to the transportation system. The Policy is created to encourage public input and decisions that will be based upon objective and subjective factors. City of Edina Transportation Policy 1 April 2005 CITY OF EDINA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION POLICY The City of Edina Transportation Commission Policy implements the purposes and objectives of the ETC as provided in Section, 1225 of the City Code (Transportation - Commission). Except with respect to maintenance issues, the Policy also incorporates the policies of the Transportation Plan as follows: Roadway Design 1. Design roadway facilities constructed in conjunction with new developments according to the intended function. 2. Upgrade existing roadways when warranted by demonstrated volume, safety or functional needs, taking into consideration environmental limitations. 3. Emphasize improvements to management, maintenance and utilization of the existing street and highway system. 4. Design residential street systems to discourage through traffic and to be compatible with other transportation modes including transit; bicycle and walking, including traffic calming measures on local streets and, in some cases, collector streets. 5. Use adequate transitions and buffers including, but not limited to, earth berms, walls, landscaping and distance to mitigate the undesirable impact of high volume roadways. 6. Promote use of sound mitigating features for residential development adjacent to high volume roadways; and make property owners and land developers responsible ,for noise attenuation at new developments near high volume roadways. Roadway Function and Access 1. Provide logical street networks to connect residential areas to the regional highway system and local activity centers. 2. Adequately control access points to the regional roadway system (including minor arterials) in terms of driveway openings and side street intersections. 3. Provide access to the local street system (including collector and local streets) in a manner that balances the need to safely and efficiently operate the street system with the need for access to land. 4. Encourage intra -area trips on minor arterials rather than the principal arterial system, and promote serving regional trips on the metropolitan highway system. City of Edina Transportation Policy 2 April 2005 r l 5. Separate, to the extent possible, conflicting uses on the public street system in order to minimize safety problems. Give special attention to pedestrian and bicycle routes. 6. Provide access to , redeveloping sites using current functional classification and standards rather than the existing access at the sites. Roadway Maintenance and Operation 1. Cooperate with other agencies having jurisdiction over streets and highways in Edina to assure good roadway conditions and operating efficiency. 2. Continue the implementation of the I -494 frontage road system and Integrated Corridor Traffic Management system through ongoing coordination with Mn/DOT, Hennepin County, and the cities of Richfield and Bloomington. 3. Maintain roads by repairing weather- related and other damage. 4. Use economic and environmentally sound management techniques for snow and ice removal. 5. Replace substandard bridges and bridges that present safety or traffic problems. Transit/TDM 1. Participate in the I -494 Commission to encourage all forms of travel demand management in order to reduce vehicle miles of travel, reduce petroleum consumption, and improve air quality. 2. Review all major new developments in light of the potential for ridesharing including bus accessibility, preferential parking for carpools/vanpools, and mixed -use development. 3. Support HOV bypasses and other preferential treatments for transit and high occupancy vehicles on streets and highways. 4. Include transit planning in the construction or upgrading of streets and highways. 5. Pursue development of a demonstration project to provide a circulator system within the Greater Southdale Area. Parking 1. Review new developments for adequacy of parking based upon need, the potential for joint use of parking facilities and opportunities to encourage ridesharing. 2. Continue to limit on- street parking in and near congested commercial areas. City of Edina Transportation Policy 3 April 2005 Y Pedestrian /Bicycle 1. Provide accessibility to pedestrians and bicycles at major activity centers, including necessary storage facilities. 2. Create pedestrian and bicycle interconnections among major generators, with continuity across major roadways and other barriers. 3. Provide sidewalks and safe crossing in high pedestrian danger areas, including high - traffic streets, commercial areas, areas with transit access, and in high- density residential locations. 4. Provide adequate signage along all bike paths including areas of conflict with pedestrians and automobile traffic. Goods Movement 1. Serve major truck users and intermodal facilities with good minor arterial access to the metropolitan highway system. Funding and Jurisdiction 1. Pursue and support regional or multi - community funding sources for improvements that provide regional or multi - community benefit. 2. Support research efforts into more efficient and cost - effective management, maintenance and replacement of street surfaces. 3. Support governmental jurisdiction over roadways that reflect the role of the roadway in the overall transportation system. 4. Develop and support legislation permitting a transportation utility. In addition to the policies contained in the Transportation Plan, the Edina Transportation Commission has adopted the following policies: Roadway Design 1. Design collector and arterial roadway corridors to be compatible with other transportation modes including transit, bicycle and pedestrian. 2. Encourage beautification of local corridors, where appropriate, with amenities such as boulevard trees, decorative street lighting, and monuments. City of Edina Transportation Policy 4 April 2005 r Roadway Function and Access 3. Review and update regional and local functional street classification and coordinate with adjacent cities and Hennepin County. Establish subcategory classifications and criteria for local streets if warranted. Revise local roadway classifications when warranted. 4. Review and monitor citywide traffic volumes, congestion, existing traffic calming devices and measures, accident history, vehicle violation history, speed limits and enforcement. 5. Educate public on vehicle operations including public relations campaigns that focus on individual responsibilities to each other rather than individual rights. 6. Review and recommend traffic calming policies and consider traffic calming implementation where requested by residents. 7. Implement measures to reduce non - local, cut - through traffic in cooperation with County and State efforts by developing a local traffic calming policy to mitigate the effects of cut - through traffic. Identify the origin and destination of cut - through traffic. 8. In conjunction with the Planning Commission, review landuse that may impact traffic implementations. Continue to monitor adjacent community redevelopment and other activity that potentially impacts the City of Edina. Transit/TDM 9. Encourage the legislature to both increase and establish a dedicated source for funding for efficient mass transit. Review and recommend policies necessitating a Transportation Demand Management and/or a mass transit component with all types of development. Parking 10. Find a location for an additional Park and Ride facility to be established in close proximity to major mass transit routes. 11. Work with appropriate commissions such as Planning and Zoning to review City Code, Section 850.08 Parking and Circulation to identify parking based upon needs. 12. Evaluate present City parking facilities. Where appropriate, amend Section 850 to provide Transportation Demand Management and transit users some spaces in City- owned ramps. City of Edina Transportation Policy 5 April 2005 Pedestrian /Bicycle 13. Review and recommend construction of pedestrian and bike paths throughout Edina cooperatively with the Three Rivers Park District and Hennepin County. 14. Promote safe walking, bicycling and driving. Promote vehicle driver respect for bicycles and pedestrians along with bicyclists and pedestrian observance of signs and use of designated paths for travel. 15. Support inclusion of pedestrian and bicycle access planning when upgrading roadways, bridges and redevelopment projects. III. PLAN IMPLEMENTATION This section generally describes the steps necessary to implement the provisions of the Policy and discusses a general strategy for carrying out the Policy provisions. TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION POLICY ADOPTION By adopting the Transportation Commission Policy, the City Council establishes the guidelines by which decisions regarding transportation facilities are made in Edina. It should be revised as necessary to respond to changing conditions and needs, both locally and regionally. The Policy should be circulated widely so the residents and the business community are aware of the opportunities and limitations that the Policy provides, thus enabling all interested parties to voice their concerns and issues with full knowledge of the process. ACTION PLAN Short Term (Immediate): Review and approve Transportation Commission Policy: o Review and identify problems and causes of Edina traffic issues (determine what is fact versus perception). o Review volume and speed criteria. o Present Draft Policy to Council. • Open public comment period. • Recommend to Council for approval. • Review Local Traffic Task Force Findings and Recommendations as it reflects the adoptive policies and procedures. Rank the six Local Traffic Task Force identified traffic "issue areas" and review and recommend action for them as Neighborhood Traffic Management Projects to the City Council. • Review and approve a Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan (NTMP). City of Edina Transportation Policy 6 April 2005 • Publicize transportation issues to be studied by ETC. • Establish a means for public communication for transportation issues including, as appropriate: o City of Edina Website o About Town o Edina Community Channel 16 o Edina Sun Current Newspaper o Local Schools o E -mails to Neighborhood Associations o Utility Bill o City Hall's Electronic Billboard • Create a citizen's guide to transportation issues Long Term (Continually): • Review and recommend Neighborhood Traffic Management Plans. • Review and update local roadway functional classification. • Hold yearly public open house for transportation issues. • Review and update Transportation Commission Policy annually. • Review and make recommendations for collector and arterial roadway planned improvements. SOURCES OF FUNDING The following sources of funding are explained in more detail in the Transportation Plan. Existing Sources of Revenue: • Federal Surface Transportation Program Funds • Congestion Management and Air Quality (CMAQ) • State Aid • Special Assessments • Livable Communities Grants • Ad Valorem Taxes • Tax Increment Financing Potential Sources of Revenue: • Impact Fees • Road Access Charges • Transportation Utility City of Edina Transportation Policy 7 April 2005 PLAN ACCEPTANCE REQUIREMENTS AND COSTS Plan acceptance requirements include educating residents in the Benefited Area about the possibility that they may be asked to fund the installation and maintenance of NTMP Projects through additional taxes and/or special assessments. A typical project includes all costs accrued for the improvement including all costs to perform the preliminary studies and data collection, temporary test installations, final studies, final design and actual construction costs. All costs associated with a Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan study and project will be assessed to the Benefited Area if the Council approves the project for final implementation. IV.NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLANS ( "NTMP") INTRODUCTION Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan (NTMP) studies are intended to respond to requests to deal with speeding and excessive volumes of traffic on streets in residential neighborhoods and on multiple streets in one or more neighborhoods, yet are intended to be sensitive to areas where, due to the implementation of calming measures, there may be a potential for diversion of traffic onto other streets and/or into other neighborhoods. These plans are required to respond to traffic problems that are symptomatic of wider problems, such as congestion or lack of capacity on the arterial system. NTMP studies include local, collector and arterial street studies and neighborhood area studies. While solutions will be considered for collector and arterial streets, only a limited number of management devices or measures will be allowed on collectors and arterials due to State design standards and funding requirements (see Appendix B). Studies will be conducted by the City Engineering Department with the involvement of other City departments and upon the approval of the Transportation Commission and the City Council. Studies will be scheduled based on available resources. Priority for studies will be based upon factors that include, but are not limited to, the following: • Previous efforts, requests and studies in the area • Intensity and extent of the problems • Degree of conflict between traffic conditions and land uses • Availability of data • Regional improvement projects scheduled or planned • Feasibility of solutions City of Edina Transportation Policy 8 April 2005 PROCESS AND SCHEDULE This section generally details the process and schedule for Neighborhood Traffic Management Plans (See Table 1). Table 1. Nei hborhood Traffic Management Plans Schedule Step Item Period (Typical) - General Traffic Management Information Open House Late September Step 1 Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan Applications 2nd Monday in Due February Step 2 Initial Screening, Scoring and Ranking of Applications March/April/May Before data collection Step 3 • Petition -to -study prepared and circulated by City staff May /June • Presentation to ETC for recommendation and to Council for approval to order plan development Step 4 Plan Development June • Review and comment by Fire, Police, Public Works and Engineering, Transit and School (transportation) agencies • Public Open House • Survey -to -test circulated and evaluated by City staff • Trial Project Plan prepared Step 5a Presentation to ETC for recommendation June Step 5b • Council approval of trial projects July • Schedule temporary installations, removals and after data collection (minimum period of 2 weeks after installation St 5c • Temporary installations July/Au st Step 6 • After data collection (trial projects) September • Review and comment by Fire, Police, Public Works, Transit, and School (transportation) agencies • Prepare evaluation summaries Step 7a Mail Surveys October Step 7b • Summarize returned surveys November • Open House Step 8a Recommendations to ETC, Public comment December Step 8b Recommendations to Council, Improvement Hearing, January Preliminary Assessment Hearing, Order Project Step 9a Survey and Design February / March Step 9b Final approval of plans by Council, Set bid schedule April Step 9c Letting, Assessment Hearing May Step 9d Construction June / July Step 10 After data collection July / August Step 11 Follow-up Evaluation Within 3 to 5 yrs City of Edina Transportation Policy 9 April 2005 NTMP PROCESS: Step 1. Study Request (Application) A Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan (NTMP) study application can be filed by any individual, a business or by a neighborhood organization. Applications to consider a NTMP study must be in writing and are due by 4:30 p.m. on the second Monday in February of each year. (See Appendix C for an NTMP application form). Step 2. Preliminary Review and Priority Ranking In response to each NTMP study application filed, City staff gathers and reviews preliminary data including data related to volume, speed, accidents and other pertinent safety information. City staff also applies the criteria for screening and ranking to prioritize studies for trial and evaluation of a NTMP. The Engineering Department ranks the studies based on the methodology outlined under "Scoring for Ranking" as defined herein, and prioritizes the trial studies for ETC review.. The number of trial studies depends on equipment and personnel availability. Some trial studies may be deferred if not feasible due to conflicting construction, development in the area, county or, state restrictions or other concerns. Applications are subject to review by the Engineering Department for possible solutions other than a NTMP study. If preliminary review indicates an immediate hazard to the public exists, the City. may choose to address the described matter separately from 'the NTMP process. The City also notifies the ETC of the status of all ranked studies and asks for comments. The City notifies all study requestors of the status of their request after the completion of the Step 2 process. A selected study is considered in the annual priority- ranking step for up to 3 years. If, after 3 years, a study has not received a high enough priority to proceed, it is no longer eligible for consideration. This time limitation ensures that the study request has not become obsolete because of changing traffic conditions and/or new residents in the area. The study requestor is notified when the 3 -year limit expires. A new request may thereafter be made to re -enter the study in the NTMP process. Step 1 is then repeated to obtain current information. Step 3. Petition -to -Study A petition -to -study shall be circulated within the defined study area (Benefited Area — see page 17 and Appendix A -1) for all studies selected to proceed to Step 3. The Transportation Commission establishes the Benefited Area, based on information obtained in the Preliminary Review stage of the process (Step 2). At a minimum, this "area City of Edina Transportation Policy 10 April 2005 is generally defined as those households and businesses fronting on the affected segments of the Benefited Area. The petition -to -study defines the issue and surveys the Benefited Area to determine if the residents within the Benefited Area agree with the issue that has been requested to be addressed. City staff prepares the petition, describing the issue and the procedures to be followed if a study is undertaken. The City then circulates the petition -to- study. Each household is entitled to one signature. Property owners not living in the Benefited Area are not included in the petition -to -study process. In order to proceed further, a minimum of 51% of all petitions -to -study must be returned with 65% of those returned indicating agreement to study the identified issue. Qualifying petitions -to -study and the underlying NTMP applications are thereafter presented to the ETC and the City Council. The ETC must recommend and the City Council must order the plan development for the study to move to Step 4. Step 4. Plan Development Based on approval from the Council, the NTMP study is commenced. The NTMP is initially reviewed by the City's Fire, Police, Public Works, Planning and Engineering Departments, and by transportation agencies, including transit agencies, and the school district. The ETC then provides notice to the Impacted Area (as defined herein) and holds a public meeting for the Impacted Area and the general public to inform residents of the proposed project, to describe the NTMP process, and to gather additional information about the study issue and related concerns within the Impacted Area. Plan development consists of the following: (a) Assessment of study issues and concerns (b) Identification of project goals and objectives (c) Identification of evaluation criteria (d) Establishment of threshold criteria (on project -by- project basis) (e) Development of alternative plans /solutions Steps 4(a) and (b) are accomplished through public meetings, neighborhood association meetings, and ETC meetings. Steps (c) through (f) are determined by City staff and the ETC. Additionally, City staff prepares a survey -to -test describing the proposed project and calling for a temporary test installation. Staff then circulates by U.S. Mail the survey - to- test within the Impacted Area. Each household and business within the Impacted Area is entitled to file one survey response. The survey responses are evaluated by City staff. Possible criteria, solutions and their impacts are proposed based on the citizen responses and sound engineering City of Edina Transportation Policy 11 April 2005 principles and are evaluated by the ETC, City staff and other affected agencies. Based upon that evaluation, a trial installation plan is prepared. Step 5. Test Installation The proposed NTMP test installation plan is presented to the ETC and the City Council. If recommended by the ETC and approved by Council, the test will be installed for a trial period of between 3 and 12 months. If the City Traffic Engineer finds that an unforeseen hazard is created by the test installation, the test installation may be modified or removed. Step 6. Project Evaluation Following the test period, the City evaluates the performance of the test NTMP in terms of the previously defined study issues and objectives. The evaluation includes the subject street and other streets affected by the project, and is based on before - and -after speeds and volumes, impacts on emergency vehicles or commercial uses, and other evaluation criteria determined during Step 4. If, in the evaluation, measurable improvements are not met to the satisfaction of the ETC and City staff, the NTMP may be modified and additional testing conducted. The test results are thereafter reviewed with the ETC, Impacted Area, and relevant City staff, and the information is distributed during the survey stage. The City will not proceed to Step 7 if the test results show the NTMP may be unsafe or otherwise violates the Policy or other relevant City policies or regulations. Step 7. Survey To forward the project to the stage where permanent implementation is approved (Step 8), a survey from households, businesses and non - resident property owners within the Impacted Area is obtained through a mail survey administered by the City. The ETC then holds an open house for the Impacted Area to update residents about the proposed project. Step 8. City Council Action Based on the project evaluation and survey, City staff members prepare a feasibility report and recommendations for the ETC and City Council. The report outlines the process followed, includes the project findings, states the reasons for the recommendations and includes a preliminary assessment roll. The feasibility report and preliminary assessment roll will be presented for a recommendation by the ETC before final action by the City Council. If the feasibility report is adopted and the preliminary assessment roll is approved by the City Council, the project is ordered. If the feasibility report and preliminary assessment roll are not adopted by the Council, the plans and specifications will not be ordered and the project will be terminated. The City of Edina Transportation Policy 12 April 2005 project will thereafter be removed from the list and the Benefited Area is not allowed to reapply for a same or similar study for five years. Step 9. Design, Final Assessment Roll and Construction Final design and construction supervision are administered by the City and are generally completed within 12 months after final approval and assessment by the City Council. City staff prepares and recommends the final assessment roll as required under authority granted by Minnesota Statute Chapter 429 Step 10. Monitoring City staff shall monitor the NTMP and gather data, including volume, speed and accident information for use in its follow -up evaluation. Step 11. Follow -up Evaluation Within the 3 to 5 year period following construction of an NTMP project, the City shall conduct a follow -up evaluation to determine if the project's goals and objectives continue to be met. This evaluation may entail traffic studies of volumes, speeds and accidents, as well as public opinion surveys. The follow -up evaluation will be conducted by City staff and presented to the ETC. CRITERIA FOR SCREENING Each NTMP study application is initially reviewed and screened for general qualification for this process. The following prescribes the general criteria used by staff to determine the eligibility for a NTMP study: 1. Roadway Classifications • Eligible: All Edina streets under the Public Works Department jurisdiction. • Not Eligible: All roadways within Edina designated as County, State, or Federal Highways. 2. Minimum Distance of the traffic calming device from the following (all must apply for eligibility): • Traffic Signals (except neckdowns) 300 ft. • Stop Signs (except neckdowns) 300 ft. • Other Traffic Calming Devices or Measures 300 ft. • Driveway /Alleys 20 ft. • Horizontal or Vertical Curves affecting sight lines 200 ft. • Railroad Crossing 300 ft. • Dead End 400 ft. City of Edina Transportation Policy 13 April 2005 I 3. Access: • No dead -end created without adequate turn around on public roadway right -of- way roadway. 4. Not - Critical Emergency Route: • To be reviewed and approved by the City Fire Chief. All four eligibility requirements must be met for scoring and consideration. SCORING FOR RANKING The following criteria defines the scoring for ranking that is used to prioritize a requested NTMP study applicaton as described in Step 2 of the NTMP process: 1. Sidewalk adjacent to the benefited area (0 to100 points): • None + 100 • All of 1 side + 50 • All of 2 sides + 0 2. Public school yard, play lot, playground development adjacent to benefited area (0 to 200 points): • None + 0 • All of 1 side + 100 • All of 2 sides + 200 3. Residential development adjacent to benefited area (0 to 100 points): • None + 0 • All of 1 side + 50 • All of 2 sides + 100 4. Number of reported correctable crashes based on last 5 years of available data (0 to 200 points): • 20 per crash; maximum of 200 points 5. Average residential density adjacent to benefited area (0 to 50 points): • 50 points maximum • (0 dwelling units per adjacent 100 lin. ft. = 0 points • 5+ dwelling units per adjacent 100 lin. ft. = 50 points) City of Edina Transportation Policy 14 April 2005 6. Average Daily Traffic Volumes - ADT (0 to 200 points): • ADT divided by 10; maximum 200 points • For intersection, street segments or multiple streets, use higher volume street 7. Percent over speed limit - ADT (0 to 200 points): • Percent over speed limit times 2.5 (times 100); maximum 200 points (80% over limit) • For intersection, street segments or multiple streets, use street with higher speeds Scoring is based on the criteria pertaining to the Benefited Area. Correctable crashes are determined by the Engineering Department. REMOVAL OF TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT DEVICES /MEASURES The City of Edina's Traffic Calming program is intended to avoid the costly installation and later costly removal of traffic calming devices and measures. On occasion, however, it may be determined to be desirable to terminate the NTMP. . If the removal is City initiated due to safety/crash issues, the removal will be at City expense. If the removal is at the request of the Benefited Area, the removal will be charged to the property owners in the defined Benefited Area. The following procedure will be used for removals initiated by the Benefited Area: 1. Petition requesting removal is submitted to the City Traffic Engineer. 2. A survey, including estimated cost for removal and data collected previously for the NTW, is mailed to each property owner in the Benefited Area. 3. Surveys are summarized 30 days after mailing. Staff makes recommendation to the ETC. 4. ETC forwards a recommendation to the Council. If the recommendation is for removal, improvement and assessment hearings are scheduled by the Council with notice to the Benefited Area. 5. Final approval of plans by Council. Set bid schedule. 6. Letting, final assessment and construction. 7. A new NTMP will not be considered for five years following the removal of a NTM P in the Benefited Area. City of Edina Transportation Policy 15 April 2005 TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT DEVICES /MEASURES — CITY OF EDINA APPROVED OPTIONS This section lists traffic management devices and measures that are approved for use in the City of Edina. Appendix B contains a detailed description and overview of each item. Speed Reduction Traffic Calming Measures: • Speed Hump • Speed Table • Raised Crosswalk • Raised Intersection • Textured Pavements • Center Island Narrowings • Gateway Treatments • Neckdowns • Choker • Chicane • Realigned Intersections • Traffic Circle • Roundabout Volume Reduction Traffic Calming Measures: • Diagonal Road Closure • Partial Street Closure • Cul -de -sac • Median Barriers • Forced Turn Islands Education and Enforcement: • Targeted Police Enforcement • Radar Speed Display Units • Neighborhood Traffic Safety Campaigns Regulatory Measures: • Stop Sign • Turn Restrictions • One Way Streets • Traffic Signals ( "Rest on Red" and "Rest on Green ") • Pavement Striping (Centerline, Edge and Transverse) City of Edina Transportation Policy 16 April 2005 BENEFITED AREA (ASSESSED AREA) This section generally defines the Benefited Area of the traffic management devices and measures for use in determining the assessment area. The following prescribes the typical Benefited Area, but may be adjusted by the ETC on a project -by- project basis. Speed Hump, Speed Table, Raised Intersection, Raised Crosswalk, Textured Pavement, Center Island Narrowings, Neckdowns, Gateway Treatments, Choker, Chicane, Traffic Circle: • Benefited Area extends 300 feet from the device along the street affected by the device, or to the nearest stop sign or traffic signal, whichever is less. Diagonal Road Closure, Round -a -bout: • Benefited Area extends to the next intersection on each leg of the intersection. Partial Street Closure, Realigned Intersection, Forced Turn Island, Median Barrier: • Benefited Area extends to the next intersection on the leg of the intersection partially closed, realigned or restricted. Cul -De -Sac: • Benefited Area extends from the point of closure to the next intersection on the leg that is closed. uity of Edma 'Transportation Policy 17 April 2005 APPENDICES APPENDIX A — DEFINITIONS APPENDIX B — TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT DEVICES / MEASURES APPENDIX C — APPLICATION REQUEST FOR NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN APPENDIX D — ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND REFERENCES APPENDIX E — FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION ROAD MAP Ulty 01 Edm 'Transportation Policy April 2005 APPENDIX A - DEFINITIONS t-iry of rain i ransportation Policy April 2005 Definitions Benefited Area — The properties expected to receive the majority of the positive impacts from the proposed traffic calming strategy and which are subject to assessment for the cost of installation or removal of a NTMP improvements. (Assessed Area) Center Island Narrowings — An island or barrier in the center of a street that serves to segregate traffic. (Midblock medians, median slowpoints, median chokers, central islands.) Chicane — Mainline deviations to deter the path of travel so that the street is not a straight line (by the installation of offset curb extensions). (Deviations, serpentines, reversing curves, twists.) Choker — Physical street narrowing to expand sidewalks and landscaped areas; possibly adding medians, on street parking, etc. (Pinch points, lane narrowing; midblock narrowings, midblock yield points, constrictions.) Circulator Service — A means provided within a major activity center, (such as a regional business concentration, a metro center or community) for movement from place to place within the center; such a system may be entirely pedestrian or may use transit. Collector Street — Roadways that are designated to "collect' traffic from neighborhood streets and get that traffic to arterial streets. Collector streets are described in the City of Edina Comprehensive Plan. Corridor Studies — Typically, highway corridor studies focus on a segment of a particular travel corridor or travel shed. Land use, access issues, capacity, level of service, geometries and safety concerns are studied; alternatives analyzed; and recommendations made. Corridor studies are usually prepared with the participation and cooperation of the affected communities and governmental agencies. Recommendations for improvements are often incorporated into the local comprehensive plans of the participating cities and continue to be used by implementing agencies as improvements in the corridor are made. Cul- de-sac — Physical street closure resulting in a dead end (no outlet) constructed with a circular turn- around area. Cut - through Traffic — Traffic that intrudes into a residential subdivision to avoid congestion or other problem from an arterial or other high level street. Diagonal Road Closures — A barrier placed diagonally across a four- legged intersection, interrupting traffic flow across the intersection. This type of barrier may be used to create a maze -like effect in a neighborhood. (Diagonal diverter.) City of Edina Transportation Policy A -1 April 2005 Feasibility Report — A report analyzing the recommended type of construction, the estimated construction cost, estimated engineering cost and the estimated assessment. Forced Turn Islands — Small traffic islands installed at intersections to channel turning movements. (Forced turn barriers, diverters.) Functional Classification (of Roadways) — In accordance with the City of Edina Transportation Plan (March 1999), the City has adopted the Metropolitan Council's functional classification system designation and guidelines for use in the City's roadway system. Functional classification involves determining what role each roadway should perform and ensures that certain transportation and non - transportation factors are taken into account in the planning and design of roadways. A complete description of the functional classification system criteria is found in Appendix D of the Transportation Plan (March 1999). The following criteria lists typical vehicle volumes carried on roadways: Principal Arterials: 15,000 to 200,000 vehicles per day Minor Arterials: 5,000 to 30,000 vehicles per day Collector Streets: 1,000 to 15,000 vehicles per day Local Streets: Less than 1,000 vehicles per day Gateway Treatment — Treatment to a street that includes a sign, banner, landscaping or other structure that helps to communicate a sense of neighborhood identity. Guide Signs — A sign that shows route designations, destinations, directions, distances, services, points of interest, or other geographical, recreational, or cultural information. . Impacted Area - Area for a project that is defined as those residences along local residential streets that are positively or negatively impacted by excessive through traffic volumes and speeding, or that may be positively or negatively impacted by proposed traffic calming. Infrastructure — Fixed facilities, such as roadways or railroad tracks; permanent structures. Level of Service (as related to highways) — The different operating conditions that occur on a lane or roadway when accommodating various traffic volumes. It is a qualitative measure of the effect of traffic flow factors, such as speed and travel time, interruption, freedom to maneuver, driver comfort and convenience, and indirectly, safety and operating costs. It is expressed as levels of service "A" through "F." Level "A" is a condition of free traffic flow where there is little or no . restriction in speed or maneuverability caused by presence of other vehicles. Level "F" is forced -flow operation at low speed with many stoppages, the highway acting as a storage area. Local Street — A roadway that connects blocks within neighborhoods. City of Edina Transportation Policy A -2 April 2005 Local Traffic — Traffic that originates from or is destined to a location within a neighborhood or area. Major Street — The street normally carrying the higher volume of vehicular traffic (vs. Minor Street). Median Barriers — Raised island or barrier in the center of the street that serves to segregate traffic. Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) — The portion of the metropolitan area identified in the Regional Blueprint where development and redevelopment is to occur and in which urban facilities and services are to be provided. The purpose of the MUSA is to define the areas within the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area that are eligible for "urban services ", specifically sewers, municipal water systems and particular types of transportation systems. This boundary line is defined and maintained by the Metropolitan Council to assist in the orderly development of the metropolitan area. All of Edina is within the MUSA area. "A" Minor Arterials — Roadways within the metropolitan area that are more regionally significant than others. These roadways are classified into the following groups: a) Relievers — Minor arterials that provide direct relief for traffic on major metropolitan highways. These roads include the closest routes parallel to the principal arterials within the core, urban reserve and urban staging areas. These roadways are proposed to accommodate medium - length trips (less than eight miles) as well as to provide relief to congested principal arterials. Improvements focus on providing additional capacity for through traffic. b) Expanders — Routes that provide a way to make connections between developing areas outside the interstate ring or beltway. These routes are located circumferentially beyond the area reasonably served by the beltway. These roadways are proposed to serve medium to long suburb -to- suburb trips. Improvements focus on preserving or obtaining right -of -way. c) Connectors — This subgroup of "A" minor arterials are those roads that would provide good, safe connections among town centers in the urban reserve, urban staging and rural areas within and near the seven counties. Improvements focus on safety and load - carrying capacity. d) Augmenters — The fourth group of "A" minor arterials are those roads that augment principal arterials within the interstate ring or beltway. The principal arterial network in this area is in place. However, the network of principal arterials serving the area is not in all cases sufficient relative to the density of development that the network serves. In these situations, these key minor arterials serve many long -range trips. Improvements focus on providing additional capacity for through traffic. City of Edina Transportation Policy A -3 April 2005 Minor Street — The street normally carrying the lower volume of vehicular traffic (vs. Major Street). Municipal State Aid (MSA) Route — A designated City roadway that receives state funds as allocated from the State gas tax for maintenance and construction. Approximately 20 percent of the City roadways are designated as MSA routes. State of Minnesota rules and standards, in addition to local jurisdiction guidelines, apply to these roadways. Neckdowns — Physical curb reduction of road width at intersections. Similar to lane narrowing but used at intersection(s). Widening of street corners at intersections to discourage cut - through traffic, to improve pedestrian access and to help define neighborhoods. (Nubs, bulb -outs, knuckles, intersection narrowings, corner bulges, safe crosses.) Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan (NTMP) — Formalized process where residents, commissioners and City staff evaluate the various requirements, benefits and tradeoffs of traffic calming projects within neighborhoods. The overall objectives for the Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan are to improve neighborhood livability by mitigating the impact of vehicular traffic on residential neighborhoods; to promote safe and pleasant conditions for motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and residents on neighborhood streets; to encourage citizen involvement and effort in neighborhood traffic management activities; to make efficient use of City resources by prioritizing traffic management requests; and to support the Comprehensive Plan policy that livability and safety of established residential neighborhoods be protected in transportation operations. Non -Local Traffic — Traffic that does not originate from or is not destined to a location within a neighborhood or area. Off -Peak Period — Time of day outside the peak period (see peak period) Partial Street Closure — Physical blockage of one direction of traffic on a two -way street. The open lane of traffic is signed "One way", and traffic from the blocked lane is not allowed to go around the barrier through the open lane. (Half closure.) Peak Hour — The hour during the peak period when travel demand is highest. Typically, peak hours are found to be from 7 to 8 a.m. and from 4:30 to 5:30 p.m. Peak Period — Typically, the time between 6:30 and 9:00 a.m. and between 3:30 and 6 p.m. on a weekday, when traffic is usually heavy. Person Trip — A one -way journey between two points by one person in a vehicle. Photo -radar Speed Enforcement — An automated camera system used to enforce speed limits. It includes the camera, an attached radar "gun" and a display that shows the speed of each passing vehicle. When a speeding vehicle is detected, the photo radar system City of Edina Transportation Policy A-4 April 2005 takes a picture of the driver and the license plate. The registered owner of the vehicle then receives a ticket in the mail. This enforcement method is not legal in Minnesota. Photo -Red Light Enforcement — Implementation of a photo red light, an automated camera and computer system can be mounted on a traffic signal pole at an intersection for red light enforcement. Photo red light takes pictures of any vehicles that run a red light, records the time elapsed since the light turned red and the vehicle entered the intersection, and issues a ticket. The photo red light systems are typically installed at key intersections that have a high number of accidents. This enforcement method is not legal in Minnesota. Platoon — A group of vehicles or pedestrians traveling together as a group, either voluntarily or involuntarily because of traffic signal controls, geometrics, or other factors. Principal Arterials — The high capacity highways that make up the metropolitan highway system, including all interstate freeways. Radar Speed Display Units — Driver feedback signs that use radar to provide motorists with an instant message, displayed on a reader board, telling them how fast they are driving. Raised Crosswalk — A speed table designed as a pedestrian crossing, generally used at mid -block locations. (Raised crossings, sidewalk extensions.) Raised Intersection — A raised plateau where roads intersect. The plateau is generally 4" above the surrounding street. (Raised junctions, intersection humps, plateaus.) Realigned Intersections — Physical realignment of intersection typically used to promote better through movements for a major roadway (vs. a minor roadway). (Modified intersections.) Regional Blueprint — The Metropolitan Council plan that sets a general direction for future development patterns in the metropolitan area and establishes guidelines for making decisions about major regional facilities that are needed to support the commercial, industrial and residential development of the area. It establishes urban and rural areas and certain development policies for different geographic policy areas. Regulatory Signs — A sign that gives notice to road users of traffic laws or regulations. Right -of -Way (Assignment) — The permitting of vehicles and/or pedestrians to proceed in a lawful manner in preference to other vehicles or pedestrians by the display of sign or signal indications. Roadway striping — Highlighting various areas of the road to increase the driver's awareness of certain conditions (e.g., edge of road striping to create a narrowing/slowing effect while defining space for cyclists). City of Edina Transportation Policy A -5 April 2005 Roundabout — Raised circular areas (similar to medians) placed at intersections. Drivers travel in a counterclockwise direction around the circle. Modern roundabouts are `yield upon entry", meaning that cars in the circle have the right of way and cars entering the circle must wait to do so until the path is clear. When a roundabout is placed in an intersection, vehicles may not travel in a straight line. (Rotaries.) Signal Preemption — Usually- referred to in this plan as a technology that triggers the green go -ahead on meters or signal lights to allow emergency vehicles (and sometimes transit vehicles) to move more quickly through signalized intersections. Speed— Speed is defined based on the following classifications: a) Advisory Speed — A recommended speed for all vehicles operating on a section of highway and based on the highway design, operating characteristics, and conditions. b) Design Speed — A selected speed used to determine the various geometric design features of a roadway. c) 85th- Pereentile Speed — The speed at or below which 85 percent of the motorized vehicles travel. d) Posted Speed — The speed limit determined by law and shown on Speed Limit signs. e) Statutory Speed — A speed limit established by legislative action that typically is applicable for highways with specified design, functional, jurisdictional and/or location characteristic and is not necessarily shown on Speed Limit signs. Speed Hump —Wave- shaped paved humps in the street. The height of the speed hump determines how fast it may be navigated without causing discomfort to the driver or damage to the vehicle. Discomfort increases as speed over the hump increases. Typically speed humps are placed in a series rather than singularly. (Road humps, undulations.) Speed Limit —The maximum (or minimum) speed applicable to a section of highway or roadway as established by law. Speed Table — Trapezoidal shaped speed humps in the street, similar to speed humps. (Trapezoidal humps, speed platforms.) Speed Zone — A section of highway with a speed limit that is established by law but which may be different from a legislatively specified statutory speed limit. Street Closure — Street closed to motor vehicles using planters, bollards, or barriers, etc. City of Edina Transportation Policy A -6 April 2005 Targeted Police Enforcement — Specific monitoring of speeding and other violations by police due to observed, frequent law disobedience. Textured Pavements — A change in pavement texture (e.g., asphalt road to brick crossing) that helps to make drivers aware of a change in the driving environment. Traffic Calming — A combination of mainly physical measures that reduce the negative effects of motor vehicle use, alter driver behavior and improve conditions for non- motorized street users. Traffic calming involves changes in street alignment, installation of barriers, and other physical measures to reduce traffic speeds and cut - through volumes in the interest of street safety, livability and other public purposes. Traffic calming measures are intended to be self - enforcing. Traffic calming measures rely on the laws of physics rather than human psychology to slow down traffic. Traffic Circle — Circular, raised island placed within the middle of intersections, requiring vehicles to divert around them, potentially forcing drivers to slow down as they traverse around the circle. (Intersection islands, similar to roundabouts.) Traffic Signal Control Systems — The degree of traffic management of an arterial is grouped and defined as follows: a) Fixed Time — The traffic signals on an arterial are controlled locally through a time clock system. In general, the progression of a through band (the amount of green time available along an arterial at a given speed) along the arterial in the peak direction is determined by past experience and is not a function of immediate traffic demand. b) Semi - actuated — The traffic signals along the arterial are designed to maximize the green time on the major route in the major direction. Timing and through band are based upon historical records. Use of green time on the minor leg dependent upon real -time demand and maximized based upon total intersection delay. c) Interconnection — A traffic signal system in which data collected at individual signals is shared with a central processor or controller. Adjustments in traffic signal control can be made based upon incoming data as opposed to historical data. d) Optimization — The process in which a traffic signal or system is modified to maximize the amount of vehicles passing through the intersection for all approaches or on the major road in the peak direction. e) Real -time Adaptive Control — An advanced traffic control system that incorporates current technologies in communications, data analysis, and traffic monitoring to provide real -time traffic control of arterials, corridors or roadway networks. City of Edina Transportation Policy A -7 April 2005 Transportation Comprehensive Plan — Assists the City in making correct transportation- related decisions today by anticipating the character, magnitude and timing of future transportation demand. Transportation Demand Management (TDM) — Programs and methods to reduce effective demand. In the broadest sense, any activity or facility that reduces vehicle trips would fall within this classification. The highest priority in the region is given to reducing single- occupant vehicle trips in the peak periods. Techniques that might be utilized are carpooling, vanpooling, transit, alternative work hours, transportation management organizations, and land development or ordinances that discourage vehicle trips and encourage walk, bike, rideshare and transit trips. Transportation Policy Plan - This document is one chapter of the Metropolitan Development Guide, as provided for in Minnesota Stat. 473, Sections 145 and 146. Section 145 states: "The Metropolitan Council shall prepare and adopt ... a comprehensive development guide for the metropolitan area." Vehicle Trip — A one -way journey made by an auto, truck or bus to convey people or goods. Volume -to- capacity Ratio (v /c) — The hourly number of vehicles expected to use a roadway in the busiest hour, divided by the number of moving vehicles the roadway can safely accommodate in an hour. Warning Signs — A sign that gives notice to road users of a situation that might not be readily apparent. City of Edina Transportation Policy A -8 April 2005 APPENDIX B - TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT DEVICES /MEASURES City of Edina Transportation Policy April 2005 TRAFFIC MANAGMENT DEVICES /MEASURES (Not in priority order) City of EdinaTransportation Policy B -1 April 2005 TRAFFIC PAGE MANAGEMENT SPEED TRAFFIC FUEL AIR/NOISE EMERGENCY TEST VS. NO. DEVICE/MEASURE REDUCTION REDUCTION CONSUMPTION POLLUTION COST SERVICES PERMANENT OTHER B-4 Speed Hump Probable Possible Small Increase Small Increase Low Possible Test Installation Not used on Increased Possible Collector and Response Time Arterial Streets B -5 Speed Table Probable Possible Small Increase Small Increase Low Possible Test Installation Not used on Increased Possible Collector and Response Time Arterial Streets B -6 Raised Crosswalk Possible Possible Small Increase Small Increase Low Possible Test Installation Not used on Increased Possible Collector and Response Time Arterial Streets B -7 Raised Intersection Probable Possible Small Increase Small Increase Medium Possible Permanent Possible Drainage to High Increased Installation Only Problem Response Time B-8 Textured Pavement Possible No Effect No Change Minimal Effect Low to Minimal Impact Permanent Increased Medium Installation Only Maintenance B -9 Center Island Possible Possible No Effect No Effect Medium Minimal Impact Test Installation Narrowings Possible B -10 Neckdowns Possible Possible Small Increase Small Increase Medium Minimal Impact Test Installation to High Possible B -11 Gateway Treatment Possible Possible No Change Small Decrease Medium Minimal Impact Permanent Increased to High Installation Only Maintenance B -12 Choker Probable Possible Small Increase Small Increase Medium Minimal Impact Test Installation Possible B -13 Chicane Probable Possible Slight Increase Slight Increase Medium Minimal Impact Test Installation Not used on to High Possible Collector and Arterial Streets B -14 Realigned Intersection Varies Varies Small Decrease Small Decrease High Varies Permanent Installation Only City of EdinaTransportation Policy B -1 April 2005 TRAFFIC MANAGMENT DEVICES /MEASURES (Not in priority order) City of Edina iortation Policy B 1005 TRAFFIC PAGE MANAGEMENT SPEED TRAFFIC FUEL AIR/NOISE EMERGENCY TEST VS. NO. DEVICE/MEASURE REDUCTION REDUCTION CONSUMPTION POLLUTION COST SERVICES PERMANENT OTHER B-15 Traffic Circle Possible Possible Slight Increase Small Increase Medium Possible Test Installation Not used on Increased Possible Collector and Response Time Arterial Streets B -16 Roundabout Probable Possible No Effect Slight Increase Medium Possible Permanent Increased to High Increased Installation Only Maintenance Response Time B -17 Diagonal Road Probable Probable Small Increase Small Increase Low to Varies Test Installation Not used on Closures Medium Possible Collector and Arterial Streets , B -18 Partial Street Closure Possible Probable Small Increase Small Increase Medium Minimal Impact Test Installation Not used on Possible Collector and Arterial Streets B -19 Cul-de -sac Probable Yes Small Increase Small Increase High Possible Test Installation Not used on Increased Possible Collector and Response Time Arterial Streets B -20 Median Barriers Small Possiblity Possible No Effect No Effect Varies Possible Test Installation _ Increased Possible Response Time B -21 Forced Turn Islands Possible Possible Small Increase Small Increase Low to Possible Test Installation Not used on Medium Increased Possible Collector and Response Time Arterial Streets B-22 Targeted Police Depends on Possible No Effect No Effect High No Effect Temporary Enforcement Amount B -23 Radar Speed Units Probable No Effect No Effect No Effect Low No Effect Temporary or Permanent B -24 Neighborhood Traffic Possible No Effect No Effect No Effect Low No Effect Temporary or Safety Campaigns Permanent B -25 Stop Sign Varies (may Varies Small Increase Small Increase Low Possible Temporary or increase) Increased Permanent Response Time City of Edina iortation Policy B 1005 TRAFFIC MANAGMENT DEVICES /MEASURES (Not in priority order) City of EdinaTransportation Policy B -3 April 2005 TRAFFIC PAGE MANAGEMENT SPEED TRAFFIC FUEL AIR/NOISE EMERGENCY • TEST VS. NO. DEVICE/MEASURE REDUCTION REDUCTION CONSUMPTION POLLUTION COST SERVICES PERMANENT OTHER B -26 Turn Restrictions Varies Yes Small Increase No Effect Low No Effect Temporary or Permanent B -27 One -Way Streets No Possible Small Decrease Small Decrease Low Varies Temporary or Permanent B -28 Traffic Signal Possible Varies Varies Varies High No Effect Temporary or ( "Rest on Red" and Permanent "Rest on Green ") B -29 Pavement Striping Possible No Effect No Effect No Effect Low No Effect Permanent Installation Only City of EdinaTransportation Policy B -3 April 2005 Definition: Speed humps are wave - shaped paved humps in the street. The height of the speed hump determines how fast it may be navigated without causing discomfort to the driver or damage to the vehicle. Discomfort increases a, speed over the hump increases. Typically speed humps are placed in a series rather than singularly. (Road humps, undulations.) Description: • Rounded raised areas of pavement typically 12 to 14 feet in length. • Often placed in a series (typically spaced 300 to 600 feet apart). • Sometimes called road humps or undulations. Applications: • Residential, local streets. • Not allowed on collector and arterial streets. • Midblock placement, not at an intersection. • Not on grades greater than 5 percent. • Work well with neckdowns. Design /Installation Issues: • Typically 12 to 14 feet in length; other lengths (10, 22, and 30 feet). • Speed hump shapes include parabolic, circular, and sinusoidal. • Hump heights range between 3 and 4 inches with trend toward 3 - 3 Y2 inches maximum. • Difficult to construct precisely; may need to specify a construction tolerance (e.g. t 1/8 inch) on height. • Often have signage (advance warning sign before first hump in series and warning sign or object marker at hump). • Typically have pavement markings (zigzag, shark's tooth, chevron, zebra). • Taper edge near curb to allow gap for drainage. • Some have speed advisories. • Bicyclists prefer that it not cover or cross a bike lane. -CC] flrl t ■� iW7 r Advantages: • Effective speed control /reduction at the installation. • May reduce traffic volumes. • Does not impact parking. • Works well with curb extensions. Disadvantages: • May increase noise (breaking and acceleration). • May impact drainage. • Not appropriate for grades greater than 5 percent. • May shift traffic to parallel streets. • Tend to reduce air quality and increase energy consumption. • May increase speeds between humps. • May cause bus passengers discomfort. • Not appropriate on some horizontal /vertical curves. • Requires signage that may be considered unsightly. tvaluallon uonsiaeratlons Speed Traffic Fuel Air /Noise Cost Emergency Test vs. Other Reduction Reduction Consumption Pollution Services Permanent Probable Possible Small Small Low Possible Test Not Used on Increase Increase Increased Installation Collector and Response Time Possible Arterial Streets City of Edina Transportation Policy B-4 April 2005 Definition: Trapezoidal shaped speed humps in the street, similar to regular speed humps. (Trapezoidal humps, Description: • Long raised speed humps with a flat section in the middle and ramps on the ends; sometimes constructed with brick or other textured materials on the flat section. Applications: • Residential, local streets. • Not allowed on collector and arterial streets. • Typically long enough for the entire wheelbase of a passenger car to rest on top. • Midblock placement or at an intersection. • Not on grades greater than 5 percent. • Work well with neckdowns. Design /Installation Issues: • Typically 22 feet in the direction of travel with 6 foot ramps on each end and a 10 foot flat section in the middle; other lengths (32 and 48 feet). • Most common height is between 3 and 4 inches (as high as 6 inches). • Ramps are typically 6 feet long (up to 10 feet long) and are either parabolic or linear. Evaluation Considerations �r { Advantages: • Effective speed control /reduction at the installation. • Designed to be aesthetically pleasing. • May reduce traffic volumes. • Typically does not impact parking. • Typically preferred by fire department over speed hump. Disadvantages: • May increase noise (breaking and acceleration). • May impact drainage. • Not appropriate for grades greater than 5 percent. • May shift traffic to parallel streets. • May increase speeds between tables. • May cause bus passengers discomfort. • Not appropriate on some curves. Speed Traffic Fuel Air /Noise Cost Emergency Test vs. Other Reduction Reduction Consumption Pollution Services Permanent Probable Possible Small Small Low Possible Test Not Used on Increase Increase Increased Installation Collector and Response Time Possible Arterial Streets City of Edina Transportation Policy B -5 April 2005 Definition: A speed table designed as a pedestrian crossing, generally used at mid -block locations. (Raised crossings, sidewalk extensions.) Description: • Speed Table with flat area to accommodate pedestrian traffic. Applications: • Local streets. • Not allowed on collector and arterial streets. • Midblock placement or at an intersection. • Not on grades greater than 5 percent. • Works well in combination with curb extensions and curb radius reductions. Design /Installation Issues: • Typically 22 feet in the direction of travel with 6 foot ramps on each end and a 10 foot flat. section in the middle; other lengths (32 and 48 feet) reported in U.S. practice. • Most common height is between 3 and 4 inches (as high as 6 inches). • Ramps are typically 6 feet long (up to 10 feet long) and are either parabolic or linear. ri ,ice(► = i. -; __I Advantages: • Effective speed control /reduction at the installation. • Effective pedestrian amenity. • May be designed to be aesthetically pleasing. • May reduce traffic volumes. • Increases pedestrian visibility and likelihood that driver yields to pedestrian. Disadvantages: • May increase noise (breaking and acceleration). • May impact drainage. • Not appropriate for grades greater than 5 percent. • May shift traffic to parallel streets. • May cause bus passengers discomfort. • Not appropriate on some curves. Evaluation conslaeratlons Speed Traffic Fuel Air /Noise Cost Emergency Test vs. Other Reduction Reduction Consumption Pollution Services Permanent Possible Possible Small Small Low Possible Permanent Not Used on Increase Increase Increased Installation Collector and Response Time Only Arterial Streets City of Edina Transportation Policy B -6 April 2005 Definition: A raised plateau where roads intersect. The plateau is generally 4 inches above the surrounding street. (Raised junctions, intersection humps, plateaus.) Description: • Flat raised areas covering entire intersections, with ramps on all approaches and often with brick or other textured materials on the flat section and ramps. Applications: • Local streets. • Allowed on collector and arterial streets at all -way stop controlled intersection only. • Works well with curb extensions and textured crosswalks. • Often part of an area wide traffic calming scheme involving both intersecting streets. Design /Installation Issues: • Storm drainage modifications may be necessary. • Typically rise to sidewalk level. • May require bollards to define edge of roadway • Installations typically have gentle 1:40 slopes on ramps. • Not typically used in densely developed urban areas where loss of parking would be unacceptable. Evaluation Considerations Advantages: • Reduction in through movement speeds at intersection. • No effect on access. • Makes entire intersections more pedestrian - friendly. • Designed to be aesthetically pleasing. Disadvantages: • May slow emergency vehicles to approximately 15 miles per hour. • May impact drainage. Speed Traffic Fuel Air /Noise Cost Emergency Test vs. Other Reduction Reduction Consumption Pollution Services Permanent Probable Possible Small Small Medium to Possible Permanent Possible Increase Increase High Increased Installation Drainage Response Time Only Problem City of Edina Transportation Policy B -7 April 2005 Definition: A change in pavement texture (e.g., asphalt road to brick crossing) that helps to make drivers aware of a change in the driving environment. Description: . An area within in the roadway set off from the typical pavement (e.g. bituminous and concrete) by using cobble stones, stamped concrete, etc. Applications: • Used as community enhancement and /or as a gateway treatment. • Works well with raised crosswalk and intersection applications. Design /installation Issues: . In some cases, not preferred by bicyclists due to rough surface. Advantages: • Designed to be aesthetically pleasing. • May be used to define pedestrian crossing. • May reduce speeds. Disadvantages: • Increased Maintenance. • May increase noise. Evaluation consiaerazions Speed Traffic Fuel Air /Noise Cost Emergency Test vs. Other Reduction Reduction Consumption Pollution Services Permanent Possible No Effect No Change Minimal Low to Minimal Permanent Effect Medium Impact Installation Only City of Edina Transportation Policy B -8 April ZUU--, Definition: An island or barrier in the center of a street that serves to segregate traffic. (Midblock medians, median slowpoints, median chokers, central islands.) Description: • Raised islands located along the centerline of a street that narrow the travel lanes at that location. Applications: • Are often nicely landscaped to provide visual amenity and neighborhood identity. • Can help pedestrianize streets by providing a mid- point refuge for pedestrians crossings. • Sometimes used on wide streets to narrow travel lanes. • Works well when combined with crosswalks. Design /Installation Issues: • Bicyclists prefer not to have the travel way narrowed into path of motor vehicles. • Islands need to be wide enough to allow signs to mark them. • Driving lanes in each direction should be 12 feet plus gutter width. • Driveways, alleys, and snowplow operations should be considered. • Should not be used where on- street parking needs are extensive. Evaluation Considerations J '% �I r MU Advantages: • Reduces pedestrian crossing width. • Provides a refuge for pedestrians and cyclists. • Provides barrier between lanes of traffic. • May produce a limited reduction in vehicle speeds. • May visually enhance the street through landscaping. • May prevent passing of turning vehicles. • Preferred by fire department/emergency response agencies to most other traffic calming measures. • May reduce traffic volumes. • Self- enforcing. Disadvantages: • May reduce parking and driveway access. • May reduce separation for bicycles and pedestrians. • May limit visibility of pedestrian crossings. • May reduce driver sightlines if over - landscaped. • Increased maintenance. Speed Traffic Fuel Air /Noise Cost Emergency Test vs. Other Reduction Reduction Consumption Pollution Services Permanent Possible Possible No Effect No Effect Medium Minimal, Impact Test Increased Installation Maintenance Possible City of Edina Transportation Policy B -9 April 2005 Definition: Physical curb reduction of road width at intersections. Similar to lane narrowing but used at intersection(s). Widening of street corners at intersections to discourage cut - through traffic, to improve pedestrian access and to hell define neighborhoods. (Nubs, bulb -outs, knuckles, intersection narrowings, corner bulges, safe crosses.) Description: • Realignment of curb, reducing street width at intersections. Applications: • Residential, local streets. • Should not be used in locations where turn lanes or through lanes would be lost. • County typically does not allow neckdowns directly adjacent to county roads. • Can be used in multiple applications or on a single segment of roadway. Design /Installation Issues: • Must result in a minimum intersection opening and radii to accommodate turning movements. • Drainage issues may be significant. • Vertical delineators or object markers are often used to make visible to snowplow operators. Evaluation Considerations Advantages: • May be aesthetically pleasing if landscaped. • Reduces pedestrian crossing distance. • May reduce speeds and traffic volumes. • Self- enforcing. • May improve sight lines. Disadvantages: • Unfriendly to cyclists unless designed to accommodate them. • Landscaping may cause sight line problems. • Increased maintenance if landscaped. • May impact drainage. • May impact bicycle accommodations. • May impact parking. • May require signage that may be considered unsightly. Speed Traffic Fuel Air /Noise Cost Emergency Test vs. Other Reduction Reduction Consumption Pollution Services Permanent Possible Possible Small Small Medium to Minimal Impact Test Increase Increase High Installation Possible City of Edina Transportation Policy B -10 April 2005 Definition: Treatment to a street that includes a sign, banner, landscaping or other structure that helps to communicate a sense of neighborhood identity. Description: • Monument or landscaping used to denote an entrance into a neighborhood. Applications: • Used at entrances to residential neighborhoods typically adjacent to collector or arterial roadways. Design /Installation Issues: • Determination and agreement for responsibility of maintenance. • Drainage issues may be significant. • Must maintain proper intersection sight lines. Evaluation Considerations Advantages: • Positive indication of a change in environment from arterial /collector roadways to residential street. • May reduce entry speed. • Helps give neighborhood a sense of identity. • Allows neighborhood creativity and participation in design. Disadvantages: • Increased maintenance. • Determination and agreement of maintenance responsibility. Speed Traffic Fuel Air /Noise Cost Emergency Test vs. Other Reduction Reduction Consumption Pollution Services Permanent Possible Possible No Change Small Medium to Minimal Impact Permanent Increased Decrease High Installation Maintenance Only City of Edina Transportation Policy B -11 April 2005 Definition: Physical street narrowing to expand sidewalks and landscaped areas; possibly adding medians, on street parking, etc. (Pinch points, lane narrowing, midblock narrowings, midblock yield points, constrictions.) Description: • Curb extensions at midblock that narrow a street by widening the boulevard or sidewalk area. Applications: • Works well with pedestrian crossings. • Works well with speed humps, speed tables, raised intersections, textured pavement, and raised median islands. • Some applications use an island, which allows drainage and bicyclists to continue between the choker and the original curb line. Design /Installation Issues: • Bicyclists prefer not to have the travelway narrowed into the path of motor vehicles. • Typically designed to narrow road to 22 feet for two - way traffic with 1:10 tapers at the ends. • Adequate drainage is a key consideration. • Provides opportunity for landscaping. • Vertical delineators, bollards or object markers are often used to make visible to snowplow operators. • Effective when used in a series. • Avoid narrowings of two way traffic to single lanes. • Avoid use in locations where at the crest of a hill and on some curves. • Parking must be restricted at the choker. ;w = Advantages: • Reduces pedestrian crossing width and increases visibility of pedestrian. • May reduce speed and traffic volume • Self- enforcing. • Preferred by many fire department/ emergency response agencies to most other traffic calming measures. Disadvantages: • May impact parking and driveway access. • Unfriendly to bicyclists unless designed to accommodate them. • May impact drainage. Evaluation uonsiaerazions Speed Traffic Fuel Air /Noise Cost Emergency Test vs. Other Reduction Reduction Consumption Pollution Services Permanent Probable Possible Small Small Medium Minimal Impact Test May Impact Increase Increase Installation Drainage Possible City of Edina Transportation Policy B -12 April 2005 Definition: Mainline deviations to deter the path of travel so that the street is not a straight line (by the installation of offset curb extensions). (Deviations, serpentines, reversing curves, twists.) Description: • A series of narrowings or curb extensions that alternate from one side of the street to the other forming S- shaped curves. Applications: • Residential, local streets. • Not allowed on collector and arterial streets. • Appropriate for midblock locations only. • Most effective with equivalent volumes on both approaches. • Typically, is a series of at least three curb extensions. • Can use on- street parking to create chicane. • Very effective method of changing the initial impression of the street. If designed correctly, drivers will not be able to see through. Appears as a road closure yet allows through movement. Design /Installation Issues: • Unless well designed, chicanes may still permit speeding by drivers cutting straight paths across the center line. • Recommend shifts in alignment of at least one lane width, deflection angles of at least 45 degrees, and center islands to prevent drivers from taking a straight "racing line" through the feature. Pvaliiatinn Considerations t s 11L s t r Advantages: • Provides opportunity for landscaping. • Pedestrians have reduced crossing distance. • Imposes minimal inconveniences to local traffic. • Accepted by public as speed control device. • May reduce speed and traffic volumes. • Self- enforcing. • Emergency response typically prefer two - lane chicanes to speed humps. Disadvantages: • Can impact parking and driveway access. • Street sweeping may need to be done manually. • May impact drainage. • Typically, not appropriate for intersections. • Not appropriate on some curves. • May cause problems during winter. • Increased maintenance. • May create head -on conflicts on narrow streets. Speed Traffic Fuel Air /Noise Cost Emergency Test vs. Other Reduction Reduction Consumption Pollution Services Permanent Probable Possible Slight Slight Medium to Minimal Test Not Used on Increase Increase High Impact Installation Collector and Possible Arterial streets City of Edina Transportation Policy B -13 April 2005 Definition: Physical realignment of intersection typically used to promote better through movements for a major roadway (vs. a minor roadway). (Modified intersections.) Description: • Revised street geometrics of an existing intersection that typically improves and decreases the traffic delay for the main through movement (vs. the less important road). Applications: • Typically used to correct and provide a non -stop condition for the legs of an existing intersection with the larger traffic volume. • Used to help define driver's right -of -way. Design /Installation Issues: • Drainage may be an issue. • May require mitigation signage due to substandard curvature of roadway. Advantages: • Provides a more fluent through movement for the major roadway. • Improves driver expectation by providing a more typical intersection. • May better define driver's right -of -way. • May reduce traffic volume. Disadvantages: • May impact parking and driveway access. • May impact drainage. • May be perceived as an inconvenience by some neighbors. • May require additional right -of -way acquisition. Evaluation considerations Speed Traffic Fuel Air /Noise Cost Emergency Test vs. Other Reduction Reduction Consumption Pollution Services Permanent Varies Varies Small Small High Varies Permanent Decrease Decrease Installation Only City of Edina Transportation Policy B -14 April 2005 Definition: Circular, raised island placed within the middle of intersections, requiring vehicles to divert around them, potentially forcing drivers to slow down as they traverse around the circle. (Intersection islands, similar to roundabouts.) Description: • Raised islands, placed in intersections, around which traffic circulates (this is not a roundabout). • Motorists yield to motorists already in the intersection. • Require drivers to slow to a speed that allows them to comfortably maneuver around them. Applications: • Intersections of local streets. • Not allowed on collector and arterial streets. • One lane each direction entering intersection. Design /Installation Issues: • Typically circular in shape, though not always. • Often controlled by YIELD signs on all approaches, but many different signage approaches are used. • Key design features are the offset distance (distance between projection of street curb and center island), lane width for circling the circle, the circle diameter, height of mountable outer ring for large vehicles such as school buses and trash trucks, and potential for pedestrian path - vehicle path conflicts. • Usually landscaped in center islands. Quality of landscaping and its maintenance are key issues. • Landscaping needs to be designed to allow adequate sight distance. • Not typically used at intersections with high volume of large trucks and buses turning left. Funhi tinn Cnnsiderations I PR I i W, v6l Advantages: • No effect on access. • May reduce speed and traffic volumes. • Effective in reducing intersection collisions. • Self- enforcing. Disadvantages: • Can result in bicycle /auto conflicts at intersections because of narrowed travel lane. • May require parking restrictions at intersection. • Left turns may be confusing. • Care must be taken to avoid routing vehicles through unmarked crosswalks on side - street approach. • Increased maintenance. Speed Traffic ^Fuel Air /Noise Cost Emergency Test vs. Other Reduction Reduction Consumption Pollution Services Permanent Possible Possible Slight Small Medium Possible Test Not Used on Increase Increase Increased Installation Collector and Response Time Possible Arterial streets City of Edina Transportation Policy B -15 April 2005 Definition: Raised circular areas (similar to medians) placed at intersections. Drivers travel in a counterclockwise direction around the circle. Modern roundabouts are "yield upon entry", meaning that cars in the circle have the right of way and cars entering the circle must wait to do so until the path is clear. When a roundabout is placed in an intersection, vehicles may not travel in a straight line. (Rotaries.) Description: • Circular intersections with specific design and traffic control features including yield control of all entering traffic, channelized approaches, and appropriate geometric curvature to ensure travel speeds within the roundabout are less than 30 mph. Applications: • Intersections of local, collector and arterial streets. • Used to improve the operation of an intersection. • Sometimes used as community enhancement as a gateway treatment. • Used in high crash areas where the crash type is inclined to be corrected by the use of a roundabout. Design /Installation Issues: • Adequate speed reduction. • Design vehicle consideration. • Pedestrian crossings located at least one vehicle length upstream from crossing and only across legs. • Circulating vehicles have the right -of -way. • All vehicles circulate in a counter - clockwise direction and pass to the right of the central island. • Incorporate splitter islands to separate traffic, to deflect entering traffic, and to provide opportunity for pedestrians to cross in two stages. Circular Roadway t15- Splitter Island Truck Apron One -way operation 20 mph �/ Yield at Entry Advantages: • Reduces speed at intersection approach • Longer speed reduction influence zone. • May reduce traffic volumes. • Effective in reducing intersection collisions. • Self- enforcing. • Provides space for landscaping. • Provides a good environment for bicycles. • Provides equal access to intersections for all drivers. • Cheaper to maintain than a traffic signal. Disadvantages: • Requires a larger amount of right -of -way than a typical intersection. • May require additional lighting and signing. • Initial safety issues as drivers adjust. • Increased maintenance responsibilities. Evaluation consiaerations Speed Traffic Fuel Air /Noise Cost Emergency Test vs. Other Reduction Reduction Consumption Pollution Services Permanent Probable Possible No Effect Slight Medium to Possible Permanent Increased Increase High Increased Installation Maintenanc. Response Time Only City of Edina Transportation Policy B -16 April 2005 Definition: A barrier placed diagonally across a four - legged intersection, interrupting traffic flow across the intersection. phis type of barrier may be used to create a maze -like effect in a neighborhood. (Diagonal diverter.) Description: • Barriers placed diagonally across an intersection, blocking the through movement. Applications: • Used only on local roadways. • Not allowed on collector and arterial streets. • Closures are typically applied only after other measures have failed or have been determined to be inappropriate. • Often used in sets to make travel through neighborhoods more circuitous - typically staggered internally in a neighborhood, which leaves through movement possible but less attractive than alternative (external) routes. • Closures have been used as a crime prevention tool. Design /Installation Issues: • Provisions are available to make diverters passable for pedestrians and bicyclists. • There may be legal issues associated with closing a public street. • Barriers may consist of landscaped islands, walls, gates, side -by -side bollards, or any other obstruction that leave an opening smaller than the width of a passenger car. • Diverter width and curvature is dependent upon the intersection roadway widths. G..�I■■-ft4lr.n f`nnairlaratinne �1 w� I ; L ,ca�u Advantages: • Typically reduces traffic volumes. • Reduces speeds at the closure area. • Bicycles /pedestrians may not be restricted. Disadvantages: • May divert significant traffic volumes to parallel local streets. • No significant effect on vehicle speeds beyond the closed block. • Increased emergency response in most cases. • Interrupts street network connectivity. • May impact drainage. • May impact parking. • Tends to increase travel distance. • May increase maintenance. `rp�Mf. •�V�■ Speed vvv...v..r Traffic �. r... Fuel Air /Noise Cost Emergency Test vs. Other Reduction Reduction Consumption Pollution Services Permanent Probable Probable Small Small Low to Varies Test Not Used on Increase Increase Medium Installation Collector and Possible Arterial streets City of Edina Transportation Policy B -17 April 2005 Definition: Physical blockage of one direction of traffic on a two -way street. The open lane of traffic is signed "One way", and traffic from the blocked lane is not allowed to go around the barrier through the open lane. (Half closure.) Description: • Barriers that block travel in one direction for a short distance on otherwise two -way streets (when two half - closures are placed across from one another at an intersection, the result is a semi - diverter). Applications: • Not allowed on collector and arterial streets. • Closures are typically applied only after other measures have failed or been determined to be inappropriate. • Often used in sets to make travel through neighborhoods more circuitous - typically staggered internally in a neighborhood, which leaves through movement possible but less attractive than alternative (external) routes. • Closures have been used as a crime prevention tool. • Intended to reduce the through traffic in one direction without the negative access issues of one -way streets. Design /Installation Issues: • Partial closure must extend to centerline of the affected street. • A minimum opening of 14 feet must be maintained. • Provisions are available to make diverters passable for pedestrians and bicyclists. • Barriers may consist of landscaped islands. Evaluation Considerations rwo "tn tnaia ��� Advantages: • Typically reduces traffic volumes (mostly in one direction and possibly in the other). • Reduces speeds at the closure area. • Allows two -way traffic in the remainder of the street. • Shorter pedestrian crossing distance. Disadvantages: • May divert significant traffic volumes to parallel local streets. • No significant effect on vehicle speeds beyond the closed block. • Interrupts street network connectivity. • Enforcement issues (compliance may not be 100 %) • Increased maintenance if landscaped. • Emergency vehicles may be minimally affected (they have to drive around partial closure with care). • Reduces access to residents. Speed Traffic Fuel Air /Noise Cost Emergency Test vs. Other Reduction Reduction Consumption Pollution Services Permanent Possible Probable Small Small Medium Minimal Test Not Used on Increase Increase Impact Installation Collector and Possible Arterial streets City of Edina Transportation Policy B -18 April 2005 a and no outlet) constructed with a circular turn - around area. Description: • A street with no outlet that eliminates cut - through traffic. Applications: • Used only on local streets. • Not allowed on collector and arterial streets. • Cannot be used on truck routes, bus routes, snow emergency routes, through streets, or any other major roadway. Design /Installation Issues: • Must be a minimum of 120 feet of right -of -way (diameter) to accommodate the minimum turn - around radius of 40 feet. • Obtain approval of police, fire and emergency medical services. Evaluation Considerations I Advantages: • Eliminates through traffic. • Reduces speed of the remaining vehicles. • Improves safety for all the street users. • Pedestrian and bike access maintained. Disadvantages: • Reduces emergency vehicle access. • Reduces access to properties for residents. • May be perceived as an inconvenience by some neighbors and an unwarranted restriction by the general public. • May increase trip lengths. • May increase volumes on other streets. • May require additional right -of -way acquisition. Speed Traffic Fuel Air /Noise Cost Emergency Test vs. Other Reduction Reduction Consumption Pollution Services Permanent Probable Yes Small Small High Possible Test Not Used on Increase Increase Increased Installation Collector and Response Time Possible Arterial streets City of Edina Transportation Policy B -19 April 2005 Definition: Raised island or barrier in the center of the street that serves to segregate traffic. Description: • Raised islands in the centerline of a street that continues through an intersection that blocks the left turn movement from all intersection approaches and the through movement at the cross street. Applications: • Median closures are typically applied only after other measures have failed or been determined to be inappropriate. • Intended to reduce the through traffic in one direction without the negative access issues of one -way streets. Design /Installation Issues: • A minimum opening of 14 feet must be maintained. • Provisions are available to make diverters passable for pedestrians and bicyclists. • Barriers may consist of landscaped islands. Evaluation Considerations �I i �f 5 U E r Advantages: • Typically reduces traffic volumes (mostly in one direction and possibly in the other). • Reduces speeds at the median area. • Allows two -way traffic in the remainder of the street. • .Shorter pedestrian crossing distance. Disadvantages: • May divert significant traffic volumes to parallel local streets. • No significant effect on vehicle speeds beyond the closed block. • Interrupts street network connectivity. • Enforcement issues (compliance may not be 100 %) • Increased maintenance if landscaped. • Emergency vehicles may be minimally affected. • Reduces access to residents. Speed Traffic Fuel Air /Noise Cost Emergency Test vs. Other Reduction Reduction Consumption Pollution Services Permanent Small Possible No Effect No Effect Varies Possible Test Possibility Increased Installation Response Time Possible City of Edina Transportation Policy B -20 April 2005 Definition: Small traffic islands installed at intersections to channel turning movements. (Forced turn barriers, diverters.) Description: • Raised island barriers placed at intersections, typically blocking the through movement. Applications: • Used only on local roadways. • Not allowed on collector and arterial streets. • Physical barrier used to divert traffic to help prevent the temptation of drivers from making an illegal turning or through movement. • Intended to reduce traffic volume or to prevent a turning movement due to safety constraints. • Used for access management. Design /Installation Issues: • Island width and curvature is dependent upon the intersection roadway widths. • Must design corner radii to accommodate vehicle turning movements (e.g. Trucks and buses). WT Evaluation Considerations i r 1 f Advantages: • Typically reduces traffic volumes. • May reduce speeds at island area. Disadvantages: • May divert significant traffic volumes to parallel streets. • Emergency vehicles may be minimally affected (they have to drive around island with care). • May interrupt street network connectivity. • May increase travel distance. Speed Traffic Fuel Air /Noise Cost Emergency Test vs. Other Reduction Reduction Consumption Pollution Services Permanent Possible Possible Small Small Low to Possible Test Not Used on Increase Increase Medium Increased Installation Collector and Response Time Possible Arterial streets City of Edina Transportation Policy B -21 April 2005 Definition: Specific monitoring of speeding and other violations by police due to observed, frequent law disobedience. Description: • Use of local police to enforce traffic laws appropriate to traffic problems identified in a neighborhood. Applications: • Should only be used when specific problems are outlined or documented. • Can be used in conjunction with speed wagon applications. Design /Installation Issues: • No design needed in a physical sense. • Due to staff time constraints, every effort should be made to clearly identify the problem (e.g. speeding, driving in the parking lane, running stop signs, etc.) • The problem should be narrowed down to the occurrence day, time, specific location, or vehicle type. • Follow -ups indicating the impact of enforcement are needed to determine the effectiveness. Evaluation Considerations Advantages: • Good temporary public relations tool. • Serves to inform pu0blic that traffic law violations are undesirable behavior for which there are consequences. • Easy to implement. • Can result in area -wide positive impacts. Disadvantages: • Effect is not permanent. • Enforcement is an expensive tool. Speed Traffic Fuel Air /Noise Cost Emergency Test vs. Other Reduction Reduction Consumption Pollution Services Permanent Depends Possible No Effect No Effect High No Effect Temporary on Amount City of Edina Transportation Policy B -22 April 2005 Definition: Driver feedback signs that use radar to provide motorists with an instant message, displayed on a reader board, telling them how fast they are driving. (Permanent Radar Signs.) Description: • Tool to help raise driver awareness. • Displays speeds of passing vehicles on a reader board • Used in areas with frequent speeding • Stationary Radar Signs direct a motorist's attention to the posted speed limit and displays the speed of the driver's vehicle on a large message board. • Purpose is to remind drivers that they are speeding to help encourage compliance. Applications: • The Police Department may use it as a "speed checkpoint" and have an officer present to issue citations to violators. • Portable Radar Sign on a dolly enables residents to borrow and place on their street • Stationary Radar Signs are used in locations that do not qualify for other physical measures, such as speed humps. Design /installation Issues: • Needs power to function. Stationary Radar Signs Evaluation Considerations Radar Dolly Radar Speed Trailer Advantages: • Heightens driver awareness of the speed limit and the speed they are traveling. Disadvantages: • May provide only short-term effectiveness. • Vandalism may be an issue. Speed Traffic Fuel Air /Noise Cost Emergency Test vs. Other Reduction Reduction Consumption Pollution Services Permanent Probable No Effect No Effect No Effect Low No Effect Temporary or Permanent City of Edina Transportation Policy B -23 April 2005 Definition: Educational campaign used to appeal for compliance with traffic laws. Description: • Neighborhood traffic safety campaigns that typically consist of personalized letters or general flyers that are distributed to all residents of a neighborhood that cite statistics on speeding within the neighborhood and appeal for compliance with traffic laws. Applications: • Used in local residential neighborhoods. Design /Installation Issues: • Target all residents of an entire neighborhood (not certain individuals). Evaluation Considerations Neighborhood Traffic Management Area Advantages: • Low cost. • May reduce speeds. • Residents may feel better after the experience despite lack of noticeable results. Disadvantages: • Effects may be short term. Speed Traffic Fuel Air /Noise Cost Emergency Test vs. Other Reduction Reduction Consumption Pollution Services Permanent Possible No Effect No Effect No Effect Low No Effect Temporary or Permanent City of Edina Transportation Policy B -24 April 2005 Definition: A regulatory sign that gives notice to road users that traffic is required to stop. Used to assign right -of -way at an intersection. Recommended for installation only when specific warrants are met in accordance with the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices ( MMUTCD). Stop signs are generally not installed to divert traffic or reduce speeding. Description: • An octagonal sign with a white legend and border on red background used to require traffic to stop. Applications: • Used at an intersection of a less important road with main road where application of the normal right -of- way rule would not be expected to provide a reasonably safe operation. • Used at a street entering a through highway or street. • Used at an unsignalized intersection in a signalized area. • Used when abnormal conditions exist such as very high speeds, restricted view or crash records indicate a need for stop control. Design /Installation Issues: • Stop signs should not be used for speed control. • Stop signs should be installed in manner that minimizes the numbers of vehicles having to stop. • In most cases, the street carrying the lowest volume should be stopped. A stop sign should not be installed on the major street unless justified by a traffic engineering study. Evaluation Considerations Advantages: • Relatively inexpensive installation cost. • Effectively defines driver's right -of -way. • Reduces speed at the intersection. Disadvantages: • When not warranted and used improperly, they typically cause negative traffic safety impacts (non - compliance with the signs and increased accidents). • May result in increased mid -block speeding. • Full compliance with stop control is rare. Speed Traffic Fuel Air /Noise Cost Emergency Test vs. Other Reduction Reduction Consumption Pollution Services Permanent Varies Varies Small Small Low Possible Temporary or Must meet (may Increase Increase Increased Permanent MMUTCD increase ) Response Time warrants City of Edina Transportation Policy B -25 April 2005 Definition: The use of regulatory signs to restrict turning movements entirely or partially (e.g. restrictions for certain time periods during peak traffic periods). Description: • Prohibition of turns typically regulated by signs placed where they will most be easily seen by road users who might be intending to turn. Applications: • Used to restrict right, left and U- turns at intersections to work in conjunction with medians, signal systems, etc. • Used during certain time periods (peak traffic hours) to help maintain safety of certain driving situations. Design /Installation Issues: • Most effective when applied to peak traffic hours. • Consideration should be given to install physical barriers (active devices) to aid in the enforcement of the regulatory sign (passive device). Evaluation Considerations Advantages: • Low installation cost. • May increase safety. Disadvantages: • High violation rates without constant enforcement or physical barriers. • May inconvenience residents. Speed Traffic Fuel Air /Noise Cost Emergency Test vs. Other Reduction Reduction Consumption Pollution Services Permanent Varies Yes Small No Effect Low No Effect Temporary or Increase Permanent City of Edina Transportation Policy B -26 April 2005 Definition: Streets that are designated for use by traffic in one direction only. Typically controlled by the use of "One - Way" regulatory signs. Description: • One -way signs used to indicate streets upon which vehicular traffic is allowed to travel in one direction only. Applications: • Used to restrict through traffic in isolated applications or in combinations that create maze -like routes through a neighborhood. • Used to increase street capacity and traffic flow. Design /Installation Issues: • Combine one -way streets in ways that force turns every block or two to avoid speeding or cut - through problems. ONE WAY Evaluation Considerations Advantages: • May increase roadway capacity. • May reduce traffic volumes. Disadvantages: • May inconvenience residents. • May increase speeds. • Enforcement issues. • May increase volumes on other streets. Speed Traffic Fuel Air /Noise Cost Emergency Test vs. Other Reduction Reduction Consumption Pollution Services Permanent No Possible Small Small Low Varies Temporary or Decrease Decrease Permanent City of Edina Transportation Policy B -27 April 2005 Definition: Semi - actuated traffic signals that are programmed to rest on green or red for the different legs of the intersection. Typically, signals are dependent upon traffic demand and maximized based upon total intersection delay with the rest on red given to the leg with the lower approach volume. Description: • 'Rest on Red" is an application of a signal system where all approaches to an intersection face red lights. If advance loops detect an approaching vehicle moving at or below the desired speed and no other vehicle is being served at the cross street, the signal turns green. If speeding is detected, the green phase is not triggered until the vehicle comes to rest at the stop line. • 'Rest on Green" is an application of a signal system where approaches along a main street will have a green light. If the traffic on the main street is moving at or below the desired speed and no one is waiting on the side street, the light will remain green on the main street. The signal will switch to red if speeding is detected. Applications: • An application of a signal system used to control speed. Design /Installation Issues: • Should not be used on roadways with high levels of traffic due to operational concerns. • May be used at non -peak times at some intersections. Advantages: • Punishes or rewards based on compliance with speed limits. • Somewhat self- enforcing. Disadvantages: • May affect intersection operation if used at intersections with high levels of traffic. Evaluation consiaerations Speed Traffic Fuel Air /Noise Cost Emergency Test vs. Other Reduction Reduction Consumption Pollution Services Permanent Possible Varies Varies Varies High No Effect Temporary or Other Permanent Agency Approval City of Edina Transportation Policy B -28 April 2005 Definition: Paint or thermoplastic street markings commonly placed for delineation that provides guidance and information to the road user. Description: • Centerline, edgeline and transverse markings on the street used to provide guidance and information to the driver. Applications: • Used to supplement other traffic control devices. • Used to effectively convey regulations, guidance or warning. • Centerlines and edgeline use may have the effect of visually narrowing the roadway. • Used to create bicycle lanes. • Patterns of transverse markings placed across travel paths used to help slow traffic at intersections and at horizontal curve locations. Design /Installation Issues: • The materials used for markings should provide the specified color throughout their useful life. • Consideration should be given to selecting materials that will minimize tripping or loss of traction for pedestrians and bicyclists. Evaluation Considerations Advantages: • Provide important information while allowing minimal diversion of driver attention from the roadway. • Perception of narrowing the roadway may modestly reduce speeds. Disadvantages: • Visibility of markings can be limited by snow, debris and water. • Marking durability is limited. Speed Traffic Fuel Air /Noise Cost Emergency Test vs. Other Reduction Reduction Consumption Pollution Services Permanent Possible No Effect No Effect No Effect Low No Effect Permanent Installation Only City of Edina Transportation Policy B -29 April 2005 APPENDIX C - APPLICATION REQUEST FOR NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN City of Edina Transportation Policy April 2005 Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan Application Form Contact Name: Address: ' Day /Message Phone: Today's Date: 'E -mail Address: Please indicate traffic issues that concern residents in your neighborhood: ❑ Speeding ❑ Traffic Volumes ❑ Pedestrian /Bicycle Safety ❑ Accidents ❑ Other: # Ak ib)INA Engineering DeRarlment 4801 West 50 Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 -1394 (952) 826 -0371 www.cityofedina.com Suggested Traffic Calming Measures (See Appendix B of the Transportation Commission Policy, please rank, No. 1 is most favored): Proposed Location from: to (street name) (street name) on (street name) We, the undersigned, as residents, hereby request the evaluation of the traffic management device listed above. We understand we may be assessed for the cost for the device. Please list all addresses in the potentially benefited area. One signature per household or business. Date Name lease print) Address Signature Page of Please return the completed application form to the Engineering Department at the address noted above. The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we Inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This application when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this Information. Edina NTMP Application Form- April 2005 APPENDIX D - ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND REFERENCES City of Edina Transportation Policy April 2005 Acknowledgments and References Mayor and City Council: Mayor James Hovland Councilmember Scot Housh Councilmember Alice Hulbert Councilmemeber Linda Masica Councilmember Ann Swenson Edina Transportation Commission: Joni Kelly Bennett Dean Dovolis Warren Plante Fred Richards (Chair) Marie Thorpe Les Wanninger Jean White Technical and Advisory: City of Edina Engineering Department City of Edina Public Works Department City of Edina Planning Department City of Edina Police Department City of Edina Fire Department City of Edina Local Traffic Task Force Cities' Websites: • City of Albuquerque Neighborhood Traffic Management Program http: / /www.cabg.gov /streets /policies.html • City of Boulder Planning and Public Works htip: / /www3.ci.boulder.co.us /pwplan/ • City of Las Vegas Traffic Engineering Division http: / /www.lasvegasnevada.gov/public works/ • City of Bellevue Transportation Department http:/ /www.ci.bellevue.wa.us /page.asp ?view =1056 • City of Bloomington Traffic Calming Policy and Procedure Manual htlp: / /www.ci.bloomington .mn.us /cityhall/commiss /ttac /calmin calming htm • City of Colorado Springs Traffic Engineering Management http:/ /www.§pringsgov.com/Page.aW9NavED=1397 • City of Austin Transportation Division htip://www.ci.austin.tx.us/roadworks/default.htm • City of Vancouver Engineering Services hltp://www.city.vancouver.bc.ca/engsvcs/ City of Edina Transportation Policy D -1 April 2005 • City of Gresham's Neighborhood Traffic Control Program http: / /www.ite.org/traffic /documents /Gresham.pdf • City of Portland Office of Transportation hLtp://www.trans.ci.portland.or.us/TrafficcalmingLhow/how.htm • City of Berkley Office of Transportation ho: / /www.ci.berkeley.ca.us /transportation/ • Seattle Department of Transportation htlp://www.seattle.gov/tranWortation/ntcpreports.htm • City of Savage Traffic Safety Committee http: / /www.ci.savage.mn.us /traffic safety.html • City of Tempe Traffic Management Program bo://www.teMpe.gov/traffic/trafingnt.htm • City of Asheville Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy htip://www.ci.asheville.nc.us/engineer/Traffigpblicy.pdf • City of Honolulu Transportation Services http:// www. co.honolulu.hi.us /dts /index.htm • City of Rochester, New York Neighborhood Traffic Calming Programs http: / /www.ci.rochester .ny.us /streetcalm/index.htm Websites: • Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Traffic Calming hllp://www.ite.org/traffic/index.html • US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration - Traffic Calming hLtp://www.ffiwa.dot.gov/enviromnent/tcalm/ • www.TrafficCalming.org ht!p://www.trafficcalming.org/ • LessTraffic.com http:// www. lesstraffic .com/Programs /SR/SR.htm • US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration - Roundabouts htip://www.tfhrc.gov/safety/00068.pd • Victoria Transportation Policy Institute hn: / /www.vlpi.org/tdm/ • Minnesota Safety Council — Crosswalk Safety hLV://www.mnsafetycouncil.org/crosswalk/ • Bucknell University — Traffic Calming Measures htip • / /www. students. bucknell. edu / projects /trafficcalming/Measures.htm 1 • Minnesota Department of Transportation — Pedestrian Plan htip://www.dot.state.mn.us/modes/pedplan.html • 3 E's of Traffic Calming hltp://www.3etrafficcalming.com/ • US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration — Safety Research http: / /www.tfhrc.gov /safety / safety.htm City of Edina Transportation Policy D -2 I April 2005 Y, Publications and Manuals: 1) Ewing, Reid H. Traffic Calming State of the Practice. Washington, DC: Institute of Transportation Engineers 1999. 2) City of Edina Transportation Plan. Edina, Minnesota, 1999. 3) City of Edina Local Traffic Task Force Findings and Recommendations. Edina, Minnesota. 2003. 4) Collier County Neighborhood Traffic Management Program. Collier County, Florida. 5) Reardon, Linda. Traffic Calming — Creatively Mitigating Traffic Speeds and Volumes. CE News. November 2001. 6) Traffic Calming, City of Minneapolis Department of Public Works Transportation Division. Minneapolis, Minnesota. 1997 7) Canadian Guide to Neighborhood Traffic Calming. Transportation Association of Canada — Canadian Institute of Transportation Engineers. December 1998 8) Saffel, Amy J. Effective Traffic Calming Applications and Implementations. Minnesota Local Road Research Board. St. Paul, Minnesota, October 1998 9) Monahan, Bill. Getting People to Police Themselves. APWA Reporter. July 2004 10) Transportation Policy Plan. Metropolitan Council, Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, Minnesota. December 1996 City of Edina Transportation Policy D -3 April 2005 APPENDIX E - FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION ROAD MAP City of Edina Transportation Policy April 2005 'a w91N�,1� o e v MY To. REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: CHERYL ENGELMAN ® CITY SANITARIAN Date: APRIL 5, 2005 Subject: APPOINTMENT OF ❑ CHERYL ENGELMAN AND To HRA GORDON HUGHES AS ® AGENTS OF THE COMMUNITY HEALTH Motion BOARD Agenda Item # IV.B. Consent ® o Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ - Discussion RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Resolution No. 2005 -23. INFORMATION/BACKGROUND:. Updating City Records. RESOLUTION NO. 2005-23 APPROVING APPOINTMENT OF CHERYL L. ENGELMAN City Of FC�111� AND GORDON HUGHES AS AGENTS OF THE y COMMUNITY HEALTH BOARD BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (Community Health Board) of the City of Edina, Minnesota, pursuant to its authority under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 145A, that it hereby appoints and authorizes the following persons to act on the Boards behalf and bind the Board for the following purposes: To serve as the Board's agent in communicating with the Commissioner of Health between Board meetings, including receiving information from the Commissioner and disseminating that information to the Board, as well as providing information to the Commissioner on the Board's behalf (Minn. Stat. 145A.04, Subd. 2). NAME: Cheryl L. Engelman ADDRESS: 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 PHONE: 952 - 826 -0464 FAX: 952 - 826 -0390 To sign and submit to the Commissioner the prepared Community Health Plan and revisions to the plan, and activity reports submitted according to Minn. Stat. 145A- 10, Subd. 5, 6, and 8: NAME: Cheryl L. Engelman To sign and submit to the Commissioner the Board's annual budget, revisions to the budget and expenditure reports submitted according to Minn. Stat 145. A.10, Subd. 6 and 8. NAME: Cheryl L. Engelman To sign and submit on behalf of the Board, delegation agreements with the Commissioner of Health according to Minn. Stat. 145A.07, Subd. 1. NAME: Gordon L. Hughes ADDRESS: 4801 West 50t" Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 PHONE: 952 - 826 -0401 FAX: 952- 826 -0390 Adopted this 5+h day of April, 2005. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 1 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 0379 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of April 5, 2005, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 2 ,20 . City Clerk o e V-� n • JN�ItppitA't°- • lase n REPORURECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: GORDON L. HUGHES CITY MANAGER Date: APRIL 5, 2005 Subject: BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES TERM LIMITS Agenda Item IV.C. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council. ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution F-1 Ordinance ® Discussion, REPORT: As a follow up to my report as to board and commission term limits, the Council asked that I provide the length of service of our current board and commission members. The attached report from Darlene Wallin provides the initial appointment dates for each member. e MEMORANDUM DATE: March 17, 2005 TO: Gordon L. Hughes City Manager FROM: Darlene Wallin SUBJECT: Boards /Commissions /Committees, Members Appointment Dates BOARD/ COMMISSION/ Comm ITTEE MEMBER APPOINTMENT DATE ART CENTER BOARD: Dolores A. Dege 2/21/89 Sandra Clark 12/21/81 Imogene Andersen 2/1/93 Linda D. Kieffer 2/1/00 Mike Kelly 5/97 Elizabeth Eisenbrey 7/1/85 Ruth Valgemae 2/1/00 Alexandra Sifferlin (Student) 2/1/05 Kenneth Rosland 5/03 Heather Randall King 7/1/03 James VanValkenburg 2/82 COMMUNITY EDUCATION SERVICES BOARD: Bethany Brand 6/30/01 Linda Masica 7/1/03 Linda Presthus 3/6/00 COMMUNITY HEALTH COMMITTEE: William Alldredge 3/1/04 Spencer Anderson (Student) 7/1/03 Idelle Longman 2/1/01 Lynn Moline 3/1/04 Brad Montgomery 3/1/04 Richard Olson 2/1/02 Tolu Oyelowo 2/1/02 Robert Scott 2/1/05 CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF APPEALS: Bruce Bermel 5/21/73 Ronald Clark 3/21/88 Quentin Collins 2/1/69 David Fisher 7/95 John Glover 2/1/02 Edward Noonan 2/7/94 HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD: Lou Blemaster 2/1/05 William Crawford 2/1/00 Karen Ferrara 2/1/05 Peggy Jennings 2/1/01 Robert Kojetin 2/1/03 Garold Nyberg 2/22/82 Marie Thorpe 2/1/03 Ian Yue (Student) 2/1/05 HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION: Mary Brindle 4/7/04(S) Jim Campbell 2/1/99(S) Carol Carmichiel 8/19/96 (C) Betsy Flaten 12/21/87 (S) Amy Frankfurt 2/1/04(S) John Goetz 2/1/05 (C) Idelle Longman 2/1/00 Z(C) Deborah Kleinman McNeil 2/1/05 (C) Sharon Ming 2/1/90(S) Andy Otness 2/1/03 (C) Wayne Prochniak 2/1/02 9C) Eileen Supple 10/97(S) PARK BOARD: Michael Damann 1 /1 /01 Andrew Finsness 3/1/99 Todd Fronek 2/1/05 Jeff Johnson School Appointee George Mus 3/1/99 Linda Presthus 3/1/99 Jessica Selleck (Student) 2/1/05 Jeff Sorem 3/1/04 Karla Sitek 3/1/99 Michael Weiss 2/1/03 PLANNING COMMISSION: Stephen Brown 9/01 David Byron 2/1/90 Michael Fischer 12/7/04 Floyd Grabiel 2/1/05 i John Lonsbury 2/1/97 Helen McClelland 2/9/76 David Runyan 2/1/70 Michael Schroeder 12/7/04 Geoffrey Workinger 12/21/87 RECYCLING /SOLID WASTE COMMISSION Tim Brownell 2/1/03 William Bryan 2/1/02 Katherine Frey 2/1/93 Mariko Hanson (Student) 2/1/05 Inna Hays 2/1/90. Dan Rasmus 2/1/05 TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION: Joni Kelly Bennett 12/03 Dean Dovolis 12/03 Warren Plante 12/03 Fred Richards 12/03 Marie Thorpe 12/03 Les Wanninger 12/03 Jean White 12/03 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS: Rodney Hardy 2/1/97 Michael Lewis 8/1/77 Edward Schwartzbauer 2/1/02 William Skallerud 2/1/96 Rose -Mary Utne 3/16/81 Mary Vasaly 2/1/02 Term Limits for Volunteer Positions Currently there is no time limit on how long an appointed volunteer position is filled by one person. As with any entity, if a community wants to be a vital and energetic community that is capable of updating itself, it must be receptive to new ideas and input. If there are appointed positions within that community that are not subject to change or that have not updated in many years, that energy and flexibility can wane. While these positions are certainly not earth - shaking, lack of updating and change can have a subtle effect and can certainly limit input of new ideas that deserve consideration. Appointed volunteers who have contributed in the same capacity for many years deserve to be recognized for their wonderful contributions, but they also should not be expected to carry on into perpetuity. Edina has always been a community of many generous residents - -- generous with their time and resources. It seems unlikely that dedicated and knowledgeable volunteers couldn't be found to fill positions of those who have been in one position for many years. A term limit of 6 - 8 years could be very beneficial. As the end of their term nears, the current volunteer could share their expertise with others who they could recommend for their role to carry on their work. That doesn't of course mean a clone - replacement, but a sharing of knowledge and expertise that has worked in the past, leaving the mayor with some recommendations for a new volunteer with some background to carry out their goals and ideas. Martha Rice 4501 Lakeview Dr. Edina O ti J� • ,171 to O 'y REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item IV.D. From: GORDON L. HUGHES Consent ❑ CITY MANAGER Information Only ❑ Date: APRIL 5 2005 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA To Council Subject: PUBLIC HEARING °❑ Motion GUIDELINES ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance Discussion REPORT: ° At the last meeting, the Council directed me to prepare background information about establishing more formal procedures for public hearings. Attached is a thorough review of this topic that was recently undertaken by the City of Eden Prairie. Minnesota cities as well as jurisdictions outside of the state were included in this survey. Although the Edina City Council has not adopted formal written policies concerning hearings, informal guidelines are included in the "Welcome to a Meeting of the Edina City Council" brochure, which is provided to meeting attendees. This brochure includes the following guidelines,, which I have paraphrased: • You may speak at hearings provided your comments are relevant to the discussion. • When addressing the Council, stand at the podium and begin your presentation by stating your name and address. • Present petitions, letters or printed material. to the Clerk prior to beginning your presentation. • Please refrain from applause or other unnecessary disturbances. , • After all have spoken, the Council will close the hearing. o ° 1 REPORT/RECOMMENDATION - PUBLIC- HEARING GUIDELINES April 5, 2005 In addition to the above guidelines, rules that are commonly used by other jurisdictions include: 1) A time limit for speakers, which may be extended if an individual is speaking on .behalf of a group whose individual members will not be testifying 2). No individual may speak a second time until everyone has had an opportunity to speak for the first time, and 3) An "encouragement" that individuals refrain from unduly repeating previous testimony by others. Based on Eden Prairie's research, the most common rule imposed by other jurisdictions is a time limit for speakers. Some jurisdictions, such as the Edina Public Schools, ask that individuals sign up. in advance if they wish to address the Council or Board. On a related note, it would also be appropriate for the Council to discuss protocols with respect to the "Concerns of Residents" portion of the agenda. In some cases, individuals . have used this portion of the agenda to conduct, in effect, a de facto public hearing on a particular issue. Some cities have successfully, adopted a more informal approach to receiving resident concerns. Under such a system, "Concerns of Residents" would be removed from the agenda and instead would be considered, by the Council prior to„ the start of the regular, televised meeting, say at 6:30 pm. Residents wishing to bring a concern to the Council would be asked to sign up in advance, if possible. (This requirement might allow the staff the opportunity to be prepared with background information.) As with public hearings, residents would be given a limited period of time to present their. issue. "Concerns of Residents" would end promptly. at 7:00 pm with the start of the regular meeting. I recommend that the Council discuss these issues at the April 5`" meeting. I will be glad to provide additional information at your request. 2 Protocols for Public Hearings City of Eden Prairie Michael Barone, Assistant to the City Manager February 1, 2005 Proiect Overview. Public bodies, such as City Councils and/or Planning Commissions, are required by law to hold public hearings to properly conduct their business. In Eden Prairie, most issues that require public hearings are generally not very contentious. But the question given for research and analysis was to find out how. other municipalities deal with their public hearings, and more specifically, find out if there are any protocols or procedures that are simple and straightforward that would be worth considering in Eden Prairie. The following communities in the metropolitan area were surveyed for response -. -. Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Park, Chanhassen, Eagan, Lakeville, Minnetonka, Northfield, Roseville, and Woodbury. An internet search was also conducted, and information was found from Bellevue, Washington; the Municipal District of Rocky View in Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Rock Hill, South Carolina; and the State of Texas State Board of Education. Additional information on this subject was also gathered from the Municipal Research & Service Center of the state of Washington. Jurisdiction Information The following information was gathered from local jurisdictions. The summary for each community notes if a jurisdiction has a formal policy or procedure in place, or if it utilizes informal guidelines for public hearings. Also included is information on any time restrictions, if applicable, or the tactics used by the Mayor or Presiding Officer of the meeting to control the length of time for speaker presentations. Jurisdictions in the Twin Cities metropolitan area Brooklyn Center The City of Brooklyn Center City Council adopted a City Council handbook a few years ago, and that handbook includes a protocol on public hearings. No time restrictions are included in the handbook to limit speaker presentations at a public hearing. Brooklyn Park The City of Brooklyn Park adopted an "Elected Officials Rules of Procedure and Code of Conduct" in June 2002. Contained within the `Rules and Code' information is a section that discusses restrictions on public input and has a protocol for public hearings. A general 3. to 5 minute time restriction is in place to limit speaker presentations, but the Mayor has the discretion to determine how much time is appropriate, based on their responsibility of running an efficient public meeting. Chanhassen The City of Chanhassen has an informal set of guidelines that they make available to the public as they visit to participate in a public meeting or public hearing. These informal guidelines discuss general expectations and behavior for speakers. A 5. minute time, restriction is included in the guidelines to limit speaker presentations, but the Mayor has the discretion to grant additional time for a speaker to talk. Eagan The City of Eagan has never adopted a formal or informal set of rules /protocols to govern speakers for public meetings or public hearings, and also does not have an informal set of guidelines for public meetings or.public. hearings, either. Lakeville The City of Lakeville City. Clerk said that there are. very few public hearings at the City Council, with most public hearings held at the Planning Commission. As designated by the Lakeville City Council, the Lakeville Planning Commission conducts Public Hearings on all land use applications.. The Lakeville Planning Commission has an informal set of guidelines that are available to those attending their Planning Commission meetings, and these guidelines discuss general expectations and behavior for speakers. No time restrictions are included in the guidelines,to limit speaker presentations at a public hearing. Minnetonka The City of Minnetonka City Council adopted a "City Council Rules of Procedure" a number of years ago that provides guidelines for the conduct of public business by or on behalf of the City Council.. No time restrictions are included to limit speaker . presentations at a public hearing, but the Mayor does have the discretion to limit the time available for public.comment. Northfield The City of Northfield has a formal procedure in place for Public Hearings. Northfield gives citizens speaking at a public hearing a 3 minute time limit per item.. Citizens may speak more than once on a topic provided everyone has had an opportunity to. speak. Roseville The City of Roseville, in August 2004, included a set of Meeting Guidelines in the introductory section of each City Council Agenda. These are general expectations and norms of behavior for Councihnember's, not for the public. Roseville has never adopted a formal or informal set of rules or protocols to govern speakers for public meetings or public hearings. Woodbury. The City of Woodbury is now in the process of assembling a formal procedure for conducting public hearings that would apply for their City Council and any other subordinate board or commission that may have public hearings under their jurisdiction. This formal procedure went before the Woodbury City. Council in September 2004 for review. Within the proposed formal procedure is a 2 minute time restriction to limit speaker presentations at public hearings. Jurisdictions Outside of Minnesota Bellevue, Washington . The City of Bellevue, Washington, has a set of guidelines that they make available to the public as they visit to participate in a public meeting or a public hearing.. These guidelines discuss general expectations and norms of behavior for speakers. A 3 minute time limit is in place, or 5 minutes if you are representing the official position of a recognized organization, to control the length of speaker presentations. Municipal District of Rocky View — Calgary, Alberta, Canada This governing body has a formal public hearing procedure to govern their Council public hearings. A 5 minute time limit is in place if you are speaking on behalf of yourself, and a 10 minute time limit is in place if you speak for a group to control the length of speaker presentations. Rock Hill, South Carolina This city has adopted a formal procedure to govern public hearings for their Planning Commission. A 3 minute time limit is in place to address the Commission, and speakers will receive,a 30- second warning from the Chair when they have 30 seconds remaining on their time limit to conclude their remarks. When a speaker is notified that their time is up, they must stop speaking immediately. State of Texas State Board of Education The state of Texas State Board of Education ( TSBOE) has provided. a procedure for public hearings to those coming before that body. Before a meeting that includes public hearings, the TSBOE determines the set length of time that testimony will be allowed per individual testifying at the meeting (3 minutes, 5 minutes, etc.) on a particular public hearing item.. They have the option to determine different lengths of time for any public hearings on their Agenda (3 minute time limit for Item A, 5 minute time limit for Item B, etc.), depending on the subject at hand. As a general guideline, three minutes is allotted per speaker, and the presenter is signaled when one minute is .left. Time will be called when the remaining minute has expired and the presenter will be allowed to finish the sentence in progress. Municipal Research & Service Center of the state of Washington The MRSC of the state of Washington had some very interesting information as written by a legal consultant a few years ago. This information was intended to be used as a guideline for cities in the state of Washington. The MRSC states the following: That there are two basic requirements of a public meeting and they are (1) that the public be notified and (2) that the public be allowed to attend. Although a public hearing is also a public meeting, the main purpose of most pubic hearings is to. obtain public testimony or comment. A public hearing may occur as part of a regular or special meeting, or it may be the sole purpose of the meeting, with no other matters addressed. The MRSC also recommends that time limits should be placed on individual comments if many people are intending to speak. The City of Eden Prairie Eden Prairie provides visitors to the Council Chambers a brochure entitled "Welcome to your City Council Meeting.". This brochure is on a rack just outside the main entrance to the City Council Chambers, and is intended as a guide to visitors wishing to speak before the Council, and addresses the subject of public hearings, as well. The brochure describes, in general, the procedure that will be followed during a public hearing. It also has some informal guidelines for addressing the City Council. These guidelines are: o State your name and address before starting your remarks. Speak clearly and talk directly into the microphone at the speaker's podium. o Direct all remarks to the Mayor. The Mayor may wish to refer any questions to the proper Councilmember or to staff. o Keep your comments brief, and do not repeat comments already made. o Individuals may speak, but cannot make motions or otherwise participate in the meeting. o A single spokesperson is usually encouraged to. express the views of a large group. o Signs, cheering, and clapping are not allowed in order to maintain a comfortable environment. Common Themes In my discussions with local municipal representatives, and in reviewing the materials received from these cities and from other cities outside of Minnesota, there were some common themes for having a successful public meeting or public hearing. Instead of repeating these common themes, city after city, I have summarized them below. Some items are seen in the Eden Prairie guidelines just mentioned above. These items are the ones most commonly seen to have a successful public meeting or public hearing: Create a non - threatening and positive environment for the meeting; which includes not allowing signs, cheering, clapping, or booing. Have all speakers identify themselves before speaking. Direct all questions to the Mayor or Presiding Officer of the meeting, not directly to any specific Council or Board member or City staff. • Have the Mayor or Presiding Officer determine who will answer a question asked by a speaker. • Do not have any person speak a second time until everyone that wishes to speak has been able to do so for the first time. • Those speaking should not repeat remarks or points of view already made by a previous speaker. • Comments in the public meeting should be limited to the subject under consideration. • The Mayor or Presiding Officer has the responsibility to run an efficient public meeting and/or public hearing, and has the discretion to modify the public meeting or public hearing process, within legal restraints, in order to make the meeting run smoothly. • The Mayor or Presiding Officer has the power to determine whether a speaker has gone beyond reasonable standards of courtesy in their remarks, and can entertain and rule on objections from other members of the Council or Board on this ground. • The audience may not comment during the Council or Boards deliberations unless requested by the Mayor or Presiding Officer for more information. Conclusion There are some jurisdictions that have created formal procedures for public hearings that do include a time limit for speakers, with the typical time limit is in the three to five minute range. Some time limits are determined by whether or not the speaker is speaking for themselves or on the behalf of a group, with more time allotted if speaking on behalf of a group. Public hearing procedures do allow the Mayor or Presiding Officer to have some discretion on limiting or extending the allotted time to speak. This discretion is usually based on the length of the Agenda or the complexity and/or level of controversy anticipated for the public hearing item. To keep the pace of a public hearing moving, most jurisdictions have the Mayor or Presiding Officer notify speakers with a verbal cue when they are getting near the end of their allotted time to speak. , To: less i U 1, REPORT/RE C OMMENDATION Mayor Hovland and,members of Agenda Item IV. E. the Edina City Council. From: John Keprios, Direc Consent ® ° Park & Recreation Dep nt Information Only Date: April 51 2005 , 'Mgr. Recommends ❑ � To HRA Subject: 2005 Braemar Inspection Tour ® To Council ® Motion ❑Resolution' Ordinance ❑ Discussion RECOMMENDATION: The Edina Park Board recommends that the Council approve the 40h Annual Braemar Inspection Tour, scheduled for Tuesday, July 12, 2005, for those invited guests shown below. The event will include an I' 84 ole round of golf and use of golf cars followed by dinner at Braemar Golf Course. The actual cost of food, beverage and golf event prizes will be covered through a- user .fee. INFO/BACKGROUND: For 39 years, the Edina City Council has extended an invitation to the following groups to gather for an 18 -hole round of golf, including golf car, followed by a dinner and nominal golf event prizes: Current members of " • Art Center Board ° • . Community Health Services Advisory Committee •, Edina Resource Center`, . • Construction Board of Appeals • Heritage Preservation Board ° 2 • Housing and Redevelopment Authority • Human Relations Commission • . Park Board- Planning Commission • Recycling and Solid Waste Commission • Zoning Board of Appeals • Edina Community Foundation • East Edina Housing Foundation .• Edina Transportation Commission • Edina Board of Education • Representative City Staff And all former members of: • Edina Park Board • . Edina City Council Edina City Attorneys The Edina Park Board- prop oses that the.City Council approve the 40'h Annual Braemar Inspection Tour „for those invited guests listed above and that the event include an 18 -hole round of golf and use of golf cars followed by dinner at Braemar Golf Course. The event is scheduled `for Tuesday., July 12, 2005. Staff will charge a fee for all those who attend the dinner.. The fee will be set a level that will cover the cost of all food, beverages, and golf event prizes. a a n To: Mayor & City Council From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: April 5, 2005 Subject: ON'SALE INTOXICATING, AND SUNDAY SALE LIQUOR LICENSES - IKASU 0 KEPOK'1 /KhC OMMEN VA ION Agenda Item,IV.F. Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion Resolution Ordinance Discussion Recommendation: Council approval of On -Sale Intoxicating and Sunday Sale Liquor License renewals for Ikasu Sushi Bar and Lounge. Info/Background: Yang Companies LLC dba Ikasu Sushi Bar, and Lounge applied for their liquor license on March 25, 2005. They filed the necessary applications and paid all applicable fees. Staff has completed their review and Chief Siitari s memo is attached for review. We have notified them that their license expired as of the 31St of March and they are currently not serving liquor until the Council acts upon their renewal application. Staff would recommend approval of the Ikasu licenses and will submit the necessary documentation to the State on their behalf. Memo To: Deb Mangen, City Clerk From: Mike Siitari, Police Chief Date: March 31, 2005 v Re: Liquor License Renewal lkasu Sushi Bar & Lounge Background checks have been completed for the 2005 -2006 licensing period for Ikasu Sushi Bar & Lounge's 'On -Sale Intoxicating and Sunday Sale' liquor license. Ikasu Sushi Bar & Lounge complies with City Code. There was in incident in February of 2005 in which three patrons were cited for underage consumption and the owner was arrested for obstructing legal process. The owner has pled not guilty and has an April court date to resolve his case. This appears to be an isolated incident that does not warrant denial of the license. I, am recommending approval of this renewal application. • Page 1 owe lase REPORT /RECOMMENDATION II To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item IV.G. From: Mike Siitari, Police Chief Consent ❑ 11 Information Only ❑ Date: April 1, 2005 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Ikasu Dance Permit ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑, Discussion ° RECOMMENDATION: Renew the Ikasu Sushi Bar & Lounge Public Dance Permit for one year. INFO /BACKGROUND: The Ikasu Sushi Bar and Lounge has held a dance permit since September of 2003. Ikasu has applied for a renewal of their permit: There have been no problems at Ikasu related to the dance permit. The application requests a dance permit for Monday through Sunday, 9:00 PM to 1:00 AM. This is an expansion on their original request for Thursday through Sunday, 10:00 PM to 1:00 AM. I would have concerns if Ikasu was becoming a nightly dance club but the owner has only held dances a few times in the last year. I recommend renewal with the previous condition that security personnel approved by the Chief of Police must be on duty when Ikasu operates as a dance club. This condition is authorized by City Code, Section 200.,06: 200.06 Police Protection. If required by the Council, the applicant shall provide, at the applicant's expense, policing of the immediate and surrounding area of the building or area of the public dancing place by security personnel approved by the Police Chief. The failure to provide such policing shall constitute grounds for the immediate suspension or revocation of the permit. O To: From: Date: Subject: REPORTIRECOMMENDATION Mayor Hovland and me bers of Agenda Item G IV. H. the Edina City Council ° John Keprios, Direc Consent Park &Recreation Dep ent Information Only ❑ April 5, 2005 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Replacement Wetland Declaration ® Motion ° For Braemar Golf Course 17`h `Tee. ❑ Resolution ° ❑ Ordinance ° Discussion RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Replacement Wetlands Declaration Agreement, Consent to Replacement Wetland, and Affidavit of Landowner as required by the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act of 1991 and directed by the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, c/o Barr Engineering Company. INFOBACKGROUND: The proposed development of the Braemar Golf Course 17`h tee project requires encroachment onto existing wetlands. As required by the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act of 1991, we must in turn replace these wetlands by creating new wetlands and/or upland buffer areas of permanent native and noninvasive dominated vegetation. The total amount of wetlands to be filled is 3,532 square feet. As shown on the Wetland Mitigation Plan drawn by Barr Engineering, the plan calls for creation of 12,200 square feet of wetland mitigation of which just over 3,000 square feet will be upland buffer area consisting of permanent native and noninvasive dominated vegetation. The Nine Mile Creek Watershed District is charged with the approval of the Replacement Plan. Their process demands that the City of Edina approve the "Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Site Specific Wetland Replacement" document, in part of which states that the City of Edina: • Owns the property where wetlands are being filled and created. • ` Agrees to maintain this area for an unlimited duration. • . Declares that no ether entities have a lien or easement on this property. • Will allow authorized parties reasonable access to inspect the replacement wetlands. • Will pay for the creation and all maintenance of the replacement wetlands. • Shall record or file this Declaration and pay all costs associated with recording or filing, and provide proof of filing or recording to the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. The reason for the proposed project is to make the par -three 17th golf hole at Braemar Golf Course more playable, eliminate an existing safety hazard, and offer a more reasonable challenge for the average golfer. The 17th hole is a par 3 hole to which players must hit over Nine Mile Creek. From this location, the hole distance is over 210 yards (mostly over water), which is a very difficult distance for many players. There is another existing tee box that is located on the south side of Nine Mile Creek that makes for a distance of only 150 yards, which lacks challenge since there is no water hazard from that direction. An additional tee box (to the north), also exists for the 17th hole, which is slightly more challenging; however, it poses a serious safety concern as many golf balls land on the tee from the players hitting their second shot on the 16th hole. In order to make the 17th hole a reasonable challenge for the average golfer and minimize the use of the more hazardous northern tee, staff proposes to extend the 17th hole tee box by approximately 20 yards on the south side of the creek. The Nine Mile Creek Watershed District will act on the wetland replacement proposal after the Declaration is approved and signed by the City of Edina. If Council approves the Declaration, the project would likely be completed by the end of July of 2005. (Above Space is Reserved for Recording Information Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Site Specific Wetland Replacement Replacement Wetland Declarant: City of Edina General Location of Replacement: Sec. 7 Twp. 116N, Rge.21 W, County of Hennepin This Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Site Specific Wetland Replacement Wetland (Declaration) is made this day of by the undersigned Declarant: RECITALS A. The Declarant holds the fee title or perpetual easement on the real property described in Exhibit A, attached hereto. B. This real property is the site of a Replacement Wetland, as defined in Minnesota Rules 8420.0110, subp. 40. Exhibit B, attached hereto, is a map or survey of the subject Replacement Wetland. C. The Declarant is seeking approval of (1) a replacement plan under Minnesota Statutes section 103G.222. D. The Replacement Wetland is subject to the Wetland Conservation Act of 1991, as amended, Minnesota Statutes section 103G.222 et sea.. and all other provisions of law that apply to wetlands, except that the exemptions in Minnesota Statutes section 103G.2241 do not apply to the Replacement Wetland, pursuant to Minnesota Rules 8420.0115. E. The Local Government Unit (LGU) charged with approval of the Replacement Plan is Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, whose address is Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, c% Barr Engineering CompmL 4700 West 77h Street. Minneapolis Minnesota 55435 -4803 F. All references in this instrument to Minnesota Statutes and Rules are to the Statutes and Page 1 of 4 BWSR_Form wCA_ Replacement_]I(Decl_ResCov).doc (April 2003) Rules currently in effect and as amended or renumbered in the future. RESTRICTIONS AND COVENANTS The Declarant makes the following declaration of restrictions and covenants for the Replacement Wetland. These restrictions and covenants shall run with the land, and bind Declarant, and Declarant's heirs, successors, and assigns: 1. The Declarant shall maintain a Replacement Wetland of the size and type specified in the replacement plan approved by the LGU and on file at the offices of the LGU. Declarant shall not make any use of the Replacement Wetland that would adversely affect the functions or values of the wetland as determined by Minnesota Rules 8420.0540, subp. 10, and as specified in the replacement plan. 2. Declarant shall pay the costs of maintenance, repairs, reconstruction, and replacement of the Replacement Wetland, which the LGU or the State of Minnesota through the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources may deem necessary to comply with the specifications for the Replacement Wetland in the approved replacement plan. 3. Declarant grants to the LGU, the State of Minnesota, and the agents and employees of the LGU and the State of Minnesota, reasonable access to the Replacement Wetland for inspection, monitoring, and enforcement purposes. This Declaration grants no access to or entry on the lands described to the general public. , 4. Declarant represents that he or she has a fee simple or easement interest in the land on which the Replacement Wetland is or will be located. Declarant represents that he or she has obtained the consent of all other parties who may have an interest in the land on which the Replacement Wetland is or will be located to the creation of the restrictions and covenants herein, and that, all such parties have agreed in writing to subordinate their interests to these restrictions and covenants, pursuant to the attached Consent and Subordination Agreement(s). 5. Declarant shall record or file this Declaration, pay all costs associated with recording or filing, and provide proof of recording or filing to the LGU. If this Declaration is given pursuant to a replacement plan, such proof shall be provided to the LGU before proceeding with construction of the Replacement Wetland. 6. Acknowledge that this Easement shall be unlimited in duration, without being re- recorded. This Easement shall be deemed to be a perpetual conservation easement pursuant to Minn. Stat. ch. 84C. 7. If the replacement plan approved by the LGU and on file at its offices requires the establishment of areas of native vegetative cover, the term "Replacement Wetland" as used in this Declaration shall also include the required areas of permanent vegetative cover, even if such areas are not wetlands. All provisions of this Declaration that apply to the Replacement Wetland shall apply equally to the required areas of native vegetative cover. In addition, the Declarant: Page 2 of 4 BWSR_Form_WCA_Replacement II(Decl_ResCov).doc (April 2003) (a) Shall comply with the applicable requirements of Minnesota Rules 8420.0540, subpart 2.1); (b) Shall, at Declarant's cost, establish and maintain permanent vegetative cover on areas specified in the replacement plan for native vegetative cover, including any necessary planting and replanting thereof, and other conservation practices, in accordance with the replacement plan; (c) Shall not produce agricultural crops on the areas specified in the replacement plan; (d) Shall not graze livestock on the areas specified in the replacement plan or; (e) Shall not place any materials, substances, or other objects, nor erector construct any type of structure, temporary or permanent, on the areas specified in the replacement plan, except as provided in the replacement plan; (f) Shall, at Declarant's cost, be responsible for weed control by complying with noxious weed control laws and emergency control of pests necessary to protect the public health on the areas specified in the replacement plan; and (g) Shall comply with any other requirements or restrictions specified in the replacement plan, including, but not limited to, haying, mowing, timber management or other vegetative t alterations that do not enhance or would degrade the ecological functions and values of the replacement site. 8. This Declaration may be modified only by the joint written approval of the LGU and the State of Minnesota through the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources. If the Replacement Wetland has been used to mitigate wetland losses under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (or successor agency) must also agree to the modification in writing. Such modification may include the release of land contained in the legal description above, if it is determined that non - wetland areas have been encumbered by this Declaration, unless the approved replacement plan designates these non - wetland areas for establishment of permanent vegetative cover. 9. This Declaration may be enforced, at law or in equity, by the LGU, or by the State of Minnesota. The LGU and the State of Minnesota shall be entitled to recover an award of reasonable attorneys fees from Declarant in any action to enforce this Declaration. The right to enforce the terms of this Declaration is not waived or forfeited by any forbearance or failure to act on the part of the State or LGU. If the subject replacement area is to be used partially or wholly to fulfill permit requirements under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act or a federal farm program, then the provisions of this Declaration that run to the State or the LGU may also be enforced by the United States of America in a court of competent jurisdiction. 10. This Declaration must be recorded and proof of recording submitted to the Page 3 of 4 13 WSR_Form_WCA_Replacement_ I I (Decl_ResCov).doc (April 2003) LGU or other regulatory authority in order to be valid. Signature of Declarant Signature of Declarant STATE OF MINNESOTA) ..ss. COUNTY OF, Hennepin), This instrument was acknowledged before me on (date) by (name(s) of person(s). (Signature of Notarial Officer) (Title) My commission expires: Attachments: [X] Attachment A (legal description) [X] Attachment B. (map or survey of Replacement Wetland) This instrument drafted by:City of Edina Page 4 of 4 BWSR_Form_WCA_Replacement_ I I (Decl_ResCov).doc (April 2003) Exhibit A: Replacement Wetland Legal Description: NEIA of the SWIA of the SETA of Section 7, Township 116 North, Range 21 West, Hennepin County, city of Edina, within the bounds of the Braemar Golf Course. P:\23\27\003\JDD\343—Braemar\Exhibit A.doc STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss COUNTY OF Hennepin ) Wayne Houle for the city of Edina, the Affiant herein, being first duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. Affiant is the owner of land described as follows, to -wit: (see attached legal description in Declaration) 2. Affiant is well - acquainted with the above - described land. 3. As of , 2005 , no persons were in possession of or claiming title to said land other than Affiant. 4. There have been no improvements made during the one hundred twenty (120) days prior to the above date for which any mechanics' liens might have arisen. 5. All taxes and assessments levied against the property have been paid when due, and such property is free and clear of any tax lien except for current taxes not yet due or not yet delinquent. 6. No lien for unpaid income taxes has been filed or is outstanding against the property. 7. The land described above is free of all mortgages, easements, liens and other encumbrances except as specified on the attached Form A -2 (Consent to Replacement Wetland). 8. No judgment or decree has been entered against Affiant that remains unsatisfied. 9. Affiant has not filed a bankruptcy petition nor had one filed against him under Title I I of the United States Code. Pagel of 2 BWSR Form WCA Replacement 12(Aff Landowners).doc (April 2003) Further your Affiant sayeth not. Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of Notary Public Page 2 of 2 BWSR Form WCA Replacement 12(Aii Landowners).doc (April 2003) WHEREAS, the City of Edina is the fee owner(s) of the following lands: [Insert same legal description from Replacement Wetland Declaration]NE1A of the SW1A of the SE 1/4 of Section 7, Township 116 North, Range 21 West, Hennepin County, city of Edina, within the bounds of the Braemar Golf Course. AND WHEREAS, the undersigned, City of Edina, has an interest in the land pursuant to: Mortgage Utility Easement for utility line or pipeline which runs through the Replacement Wetland Drainage Easement for ditch, tile line or other drainage system which runs through the Replacement Wetland Contract for Deed Lien Other (specify) which document is dated , and was recorded on in the Office of the County Recorder for Hennepin County, in Book , Page , as Document No. ; and WHEREAS, the fee owner or Landowner as defined in Minn. Rules part 8420.0110, subp. 29 intends to restore or create a Replacement Wetland under Minn. Stat. § 103G.222 and Minn. Rules part 8420.0530 or Minn Rules part 8420.0740, upon the land described above. NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the undersigned hereby consents to the creation or restoration of the Replacement Wetland. The undersigned acknowledges that its interest in the land on which the Replacement Wetland is located shall be subject to all federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding wetlands, including the Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Replacement Wetland that is attached hereto. -Page 1 of 2 BWSR Form WCA Replacement 13(Cons Repl).doc (April 2003) IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, document this day of STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. , the of the undersigned, has executed this Title ACKNOWLEDGEMENT COUNTY OFHenngpin ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , by Notary Public Notary Stamp or Seal This instrument was drafted by: Board of Water and Soil Resources One West Water Street, Suite 200 St. Paul, Minnesota 55107 - Page 2 of 2 BWSR Form WCA Replacement 13(Cons Repl).doc (April 2003) ( 1 1 x 8 3 3. z _- - - -- - - -- �P�W: WERAND MITIGATION O o m 4o u.• scArE « rEEr 17th TEE EXPANSION mom= E 1- 7����♦�� T Lr.r7� BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE \ I reDPOSEO AOpTNM/1 N6LIC VALUE ERp, ((5..00 yf.) ,NE K/LAIA) calson, rp1 UrLAND " T k T1% DOWHA ED VE `T `E ESTNT MM ANO NowVTo WPLA TED KOCTAr ETo RE MW ADUCENT 10 E[MD[NENT T OF TO eK. C1Kpr MOT TO W- ( 0 Kw2NT O M K. KniMO ClrtpT Au• I>.ler yr.) KIUK K1LNq FlLL SSJ2 yr. (reEV`OS[D � A,rN yf.) uxuo u sn yr, QEAlEO N[w KnAND CAEdT •1rcA (x.u. s.r. /• . yiT s.r.) ilc 11ETlN1U CQVeplVAl10N KT ALLOw3 ra x>: NK ra 1K eEStgA110N a nx xAtw•L N1p10LOG1' eCEl1( ANO KOETAnON ®CIIEAI[e wNeUt VALVE Cllmt ANEA (3.2W yr. /• gn U.) "C KiLANO CONStIIWM ACT 4L FM 1SR PVC rpl M KE l Anl Of NAnK KaLTAnpI —Ala' MEN KTLArO —1 AREAS (err yr. ♦ 2MO &r.-Sr- 3147 S.F.) �/ 1 {f� — Rff[I — - - 830\- ME -EMI N0 Cd J" —ew— rRaROSro calauls —832— AS -e T CMIT"S 17th TEE EXPANSION mom= E 1- 7����♦�� T Lr.r7� BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE \ I Barr Footer. Date. 3115/2005 5.05.43 PM File. I: Wrojectst23t271354\Braemar 17th Teet Gis \Prgect\replacement_location.mxd User: mew Eden Prairie 1993 Quadrangle. Replacement Wetland 0 Feet 800 400 0 800 Exhibit B MAP OF REPLACEMENT WETLAND Braemar Golf Course 17th Tee Expansion City of Edina Edina, MN REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: 5J- Steven L. Lillehaug, PE, PTOE Assistant Engineer Date: April 5, 2005 Subject: Receive Feasibility Study for Schaefer Road Roadway Improvement No. A -216, Schaefer Circle Roadway Improvement No. A -217 and West 58 h Street Roadway Improvement No. BA -328 Info /Background: Agenda Item # Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends Action IV. I ❑ To H RA ® To Council ® Motion ® Resolution ❑Ordinance ❑ Discussion Schaefer Road Improvement No. A -216 — Receive Feasibility Study for the Schaefer Road roadway and utility project. The Feasibility Study is attached along with all correspondence received to date. The public hearing and ordering for this project is scheduled for April 19, 2005. Schaefer Circle Improvement No. A -217 — Receive Feasibility Study for the Schaefer Circle roadway and utility project. The Feasibility Study is attached along with all correspondence received to date. The public hearing and ordering for this project is scheduled for April 19, 2005. West 58th Street Improvement No. BA -328 — Receive Feasibility Study for the Wet 580' Street roadway and utility project. The Feasibility Study is attached along with all correspondence received to date. The public hearing and ordering for this project is scheduled for April 19, 2005. uo G: \Engineering \Improvements \BA328 -West 58th St\ CORRESPONDENCE\ Misc\ BA326- A216- A217_RR_Feasibility.doc w9�N�,r o� e FEASIBILITY STUDY — A216 Cn a0 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS SCHAEFER ROAD MARCH 31, 2005 LOCATION: The Schaefer Road project extends from Interlachen Boulevard to Westwood Court (see Figure 1). 6535 4900 4901 4920 4921 5111 4904 5020 929 6516 4924 4925 5024 5112 - 5117 4905 6408 6400 01 6520 4928 4929 6424 4909 i 5116 5175 INTERLACHEN 29 6547 6519 6501 5200 6401 6220 6212 62pg 5204 6413 6409 6405 3 5008 5009 6229 8225 6221 6217 62 15 5216 5217 5004 5012 5013 5224 5221 5224 5016 5021 5225 5300 5008 5020 6404 5304 5025 5012 5100 6312 5304 6501 HAROLD WO 6301 6305 5101 6309 5106 5321 5311 5316 6313 6405 5016 5109 5112 5116 5117 5120 5125 c 5152 w - a 5200 5201 5204 5200 5200 U y 5204 5210 5205 5212 5209 5211 5 5216 11 5215 5215 '224 5220 5219 23 5219 5224 5224 5223 227 5231 5228 5227 5304 5305 6404 6400 5308 5309 5234 5238 5301 105 6401 6418 6412 4 6500 6424 6420 6409 5312 Figure 1. Project Area Map 6308 6304 6300 6228 6224 6212 6328 6320 6228 6201 5004 5000 d.502fi, 5008 5001 5012 5020 Project Boundary 5C o X09 5021 5025 5101 5020 5320 5106 51t3 510 0 5111 5017 5020 5024 5112 - 5117 5117 5116 5175 5124 5200 5201 6220 6212 62pg 5204 8204 6200 5209 6231 6229 8225 6221 6217 62 15 5216 5217 8209 5220 5225 5224 5221 5224 5228 5225 5300 6300 6304 6308 5300 5304 ESTWOOD C T 5301 5308 6312 5304 6301 6305 6309 5331 5321 5311 5316 6313 6316 5320 Feasibility Study Schaefer Road Imp. No. A -216 March 31, 2005 INITIATION & ISSUES: The Schaefer Road project was initiated partially by a resident request to address drainage problems along the roadway. The Engineering Department expanded this area and included the neighborhood as outlined in Figure 1 as part of the City's planning process to update the infrastructure within this neighborhood. The following are existing features that present issues in determining the feasibility of the project and are addressed in this report: • Surface rainwater drainage issues • Poor condition of existing pavement • Existing landscaping, retaining walls, driveways, etc. • Existing mature trees EXISTING CONDITIONS: The roadway in this neighborhood was previously re- constructed in the early 1970's and the utilities (sanitary sewer, storm sewer and watermain) were installed ranging from 1965 to 1993. The roadway width along Schaefer Road varies from 27 -ft to 30 -ft with no curb and gutter and no sidewalks. The pavement on Schaefer Road is in generally poor condition with very poor conditions experienced along the edge of the roadways in many locations (see Photo 1). The pavement throughout this neighborhood appears to be approaching the end of its useful life while the costs to maintain and repair the roadways are steadily increasing. Photo 1. Existing Pavement Condition & Drainage Issues k. Page 2 of 6 • Feasibility Study Schaefer Road Imp. No. A -216 March 31, 2005 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: Schaefer Road generally consists of rolling terrain varying from 0.5% to 5.3% slopes. There is some existing storm sewer in the area, but overall the surface drainage is relatively poor with erosion problems along the edge of the roadway in certain areas. The roadway remains in a wet condition most of the summer due to the amount of sump pump discharge onto the roadway. Watermain /water service breaks and sanitary sewer blockage occurrences have been reported as minimal in this area. The private utilities in this neighborhood are located both overhead and underground. Street lighting consists of standard "cobra head" lights mounted on wood poles that are located intermittently along Schaefer Road. This project involves reconstructing the existing bituminous pavement and base, replacing fire hydrants, and extending the storm sewer to accommodate new sump pump drain tile where needed to allow the property owners to connect their sump pump discharges directly into the storm sewer system. This will eliminate the adjacent sump pump discharge directly onto the roadway. A neighborhood informational meeting was held on November 15, 2004 to gather data and answer questions the homeowners had relating to the project. Approximately four residents attended this meeting residing on Schaefer Road. A neighborhood survey was sent to learn the favorability of installing decorative streetlights with this project and the favorability of installing traffic calming measures in response to comments received at the information meeting. Input from the survey and comments received throughout the planning of this project have been included in this report as an attachment. The results of the survey are shown in Table 1. *Note: Based on a 1 to 3 ranking system. Traditional was most favored with the lowest average ranking of 1.5. Only two returned surveys indicated rankings for lighting. Table 1. Survey Results The following is a summary regarding the survey results including staff's recommendations: • The majority of residents do not prefer installing decorative street lighting — Staff does not recommend including decorative street lighting with this project since the improvement is overwhelmingly not supported by the property owners and a direct benefit to each property for this improvement is difficult to substantiate. Page 3 of 6 Returned Prefer Decorative Street Lights Prefer Traffic Calming Measures Total Surveys Surveys Yes No I Style* Yes No Sent Colonial Acorn Traditional 22 1 11 1 10 2.5 2 1.5 6 4 of Returned Surveys 1 50% 9% 91% 55% 36% *Note: Based on a 1 to 3 ranking system. Traditional was most favored with the lowest average ranking of 1.5. Only two returned surveys indicated rankings for lighting. Table 1. Survey Results The following is a summary regarding the survey results including staff's recommendations: • The majority of residents do not prefer installing decorative street lighting — Staff does not recommend including decorative street lighting with this project since the improvement is overwhelmingly not supported by the property owners and a direct benefit to each property for this improvement is difficult to substantiate. Page 3 of 6 Feasibility Study Schaefer Road Imp. No. A -216 March 31, 2005 The majority of residents prefer implementing traffic calming measures in this neighborhood — A traffic survey was performed on Schaefer Road in July 1999. The Monday through Friday average daily traffic volume was 1,049 vehicles per day and the 851h- percentile speed was 34.5 mph. The vehicle volume is relatively high for a local road with speeds exceeding 30 mph; however, these volumes and speeds are very typical throughout Edina neighborhoods on local roadways. Staff recommends the residents file an application for traffic calming in accordance with the Transportation Commission Policy and the Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan. It is not anticipated that traffic calming measures would be included with this construction project due to the procedure and schedule as outlined in the Policy. The proposed roadway width is 28 -ft, which closely matches the existing width and helps minimize impacts to the surrounding topography and landscaping features (see Figure 2). Trees will be protected and impacts to the trees will be minimized. Figure 2. Proposed Project Layout Staff is continuing to analyze the utility repairs /replacements and will include the needed improvements with the final plans. Other utility activities may include replacement of gas mains within the neighborhood, which is determined and coordinated by the local gas utility company. Page 4 of 6 Feasibility Study Schaefer Road Imp. No. A -216 March 31, 2005 RIGHT -OF -WAY & EASEMENTS The right -of -way along Schaefer Road is typically 60 feet wide. All proposed improvements stay within this right -of -way and no additional easement requirements are anticipated. FEASIBILITY: This project is feasible from an engineering and City standpoint. PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $188,000. The total cost includes indirect costs of 15% for engineering _and clerical costs and 7.5% for first year finance costs. The estimated construction cost does not include storm sewer or other utility improvements. Final utility improvements will be determined during the final design and will be funded through the respective utility fund. Funding for the entire project will be from a combination of special assessment and utility funds. ASSESSMENTS: A special assessment of approximately $9,400 per residential equivalent unit or assessable lot will be levied against residents adjacent to the neighborhood's roadways. The justification for assessments is attributed to properties receiving benefit of the new pavement. The assessable lot is based on a detached single family home. Properties that abut the project and have access with their side or rear yards will be assessed 1/3 of the assessable unit cost (see Figure 3). PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule is feasible from an Engineering standpoint: ATTACHMENTS: Council Orders Public Hearing .......... ..........................March 15, 2005 Receive Feasibility Report .................... ..........................April 5, 2005 Public Hearing ........................... ............................... April 19, 2005 Bid Opening ................................:... ............................... May 2005 Award Contract ..... ............................... ...........................June 2005 Begin Construction .......................... ............................... June 2005 Complete Construction ......................... ........................October 2005 • Information Meeting Attendance List and Comments • Survey Results and Comments • Preliminary Assessment Roll Page 5 of 6 Feasibility Study Schaefer Road Imp. No. A -216 March 31, 2005 6535 49 ._ ... 01 ; 'r - 6308 6304 4920 � [499221 6300 4904 6228 329 6516 4905 4924 4925 6408 64 6224 � 28 6212 131 6520 4928 - 49 6424 4909 9� 6320 6228 INTER LAC HEN ■ !29 6547 6519 6501 6401 ■ = 5004 5000 6321 6201 3 5008 6413 5009 6409 6405 ■ US = 5008 5004 5012 5013 • • 5011 t 5001 • p.s - : 5016 ■ 5008 50, 2 5017 Z 5020 5021 ai i Project 5020 6 "04: 5021 i Boundary 5025 5012 i 5r o su09 5100 ■ 6501HAROLD WO • rr •. 5025 i 5020 502, 5025 5101 5101 .. 1//rrr////q 5108 5108 6405 : • 5109 ■ 5018 i ■ 51 11 i 5108 5111 5112 = • 501! 5020 �■rUMrrrrrr !! /rrr� _ : ■ 5024 5112 5117 5116 5117 5117 so 5176 • 5120 5125 1 K 5152 W ■ 5125 : 5124 =rrrrNry LL _ ■ 5200 • 5201 5204 5200 i 5200 • 5201 6220 5200 5204 5210 i 6212 6208 5204 5205 Yr•r /NA - ■ ■ /Nr/ 6231 6204 6200 5212 � 5209 5209 5211 = 2* 196229 4.229 5216 6225 6221 6217 6215 6209 5216 5217 11 5215 5215 = j 5224 _ ■ t/Nrrr•� 5220 5220 = 5225 5224 5221 5224 5219 5219 5224 A '23 5224 5223.0 IN 5228 6300 6304 6308 5225 5300 5227 5231 1/■////rr/r/rr//////////r■ irrr • / /rrri 5300 5304 5228 5304 5305 6404 6400 WESTWOOD CT 5227 5301 5308 6312 5304 6301 6305 5234 5238 5308 5301 5309 Assessments 6416 6412 6401 6405 5331 6309 6313 6316 $3,150.00 X504 6500 6'124 6420 6409 5312 $9,400,00 6390 53 Figure 3. Preliminary Assessment Map Page 6 of 6 SIGN IN SHEET - INIORMATION MEETING 1 and Ridge Rd. November 15, 2004 (Please print legibly - Thank you!) 'Address r � � I 6WEVIAOS r �r �, _ � l -'r -' L 5 .._ 2'�iliil�'3�C•(.7�5 `.� "JF+?,SnJI _MUM i . • UM M i ,A p6%k Rp- cetve4 ui i s'oH b�j �S+tW L QUESTION / COMMENT CARD �nld�er w6lem avtd eresion ay,4- -lb !away er AW GZ(j� �Q 'p.°'; nd (- cxtee�' �Fhat 4 I, �s has heen aA ,v # A nkeh lctn anal nea u-af d +-o have �4- .4,4d res sed wA d �%e �S�h Qe � QA r Oro i e c� . �� I n� T k6ow 520 Soh ne fer . Name Q Address PLEASE PRINT PLEASE PRINT . p 6we- ca l QUESTION / COMMENT CARD Name Ma fAho` S�� , I f � Address Soil SLkae r RJ - PLEASE PRINT PLEASE PRINT 945-3-3-70 Phone Conversation on November 17, 2004 Steve L. Ed Glickman 952 - 935 -0625 5217 Schaefer Rd. • DRAIN TILE /STORM SEWER WILL BE INSTALLED WITH RDWY PROJECT TO ACCOMMODATE HIS BACKYARD POND PUMPING ONTO THE STREET. • WOULD LIKE US TO TAKE A LOOK AT PONDING THAT OCCURS IN HIS FRONT YARD. CURRENTLY AN INFILTRATION TYPE SYSTEM. HE MAY POSSIBLY PUT IN A SUMP PUMP. • DISCUSSED A HUGE 200 YR OLD COTTON WOOD TREE. • HIS NEIGHBOR (HARRY) HAS A HUGE OAK. ROOTS GROWING INTO STREET. SUGGESTED PUTTING A FLAG ON THE TREE SO WE KNOW NOT TO IMPACT IT. ❑ WOULD LIKE HIS NEIGHBOR (5209 SCHAEFER RD) TO DIRECT HIS WATER TO THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM IN THE STREET (NEW STORM SEWER) AND NOT TO HIS PROPERTY. Schaefer Road Improvements Improvement No. A -216 SURVEY RESULTS NO STREET Returned Decorative Street Lights TRAFFIC CALMING COMMENTS Survey Yes No Style Yes No Colonial jAcorn Traditional 5004 SCHAEFER RD 5008 SCHAEFER RD X X' X" 'Don't want, but if to be, the one that gives the best light; "Speed bump between 5004 and 5008 Schaefer Rd. The knoll makes these five driveways somewhat blind and the traffic is sometimes fast. There have been some very dose calls. 5011 SCHAEFER RD X X X We need some sort of traffic calming on Schaefer Rd, please consider implementing. 5012 SCHAEFER RD 5016 SCHAEFER RD 5017 SCHAEFER RD X X X Schaefer is a raoetrackl 5021 SCHAEFER RD X X 2 3 1 X Speeders going 40-50 mph going down the hill between 5021 and 5217 Schaefer Rd. This happens frequentlyll 5025 SCHAEFER RD 5113 SCHAEFER RD 5117 SCHAEFER RD X X Cars do frequently exceed speed limit on this street - often by as much as 20 mph, but I don't know how best to slow vehicles down. 5125 SCHAEFER RD X X X 5152 SCHAEFER RD 5200 SCHAEFER RD 5201 SCHAEFER RD X X X' 'That was done years ago on the comer of Knoll Dr and Schaefer. I was a disaster and quickly removed by a good sense council I believe. 5209 SCHAEFER RD X X X 5217 SCHAEFER RD X X X 5224 SCHAEFER RD 5224 SCHAEFER RD .5225 SCHAEFER RD X X X Oppose entire pmject, see letter. 6300 WESTWOOD CT X X 3 1 2 X RE: Rainwater drainage: It is my opinion that in the past a resident(s) has taken advantage of the city to drain water from a pond because of overflowing due to rain. It was dearly not an instance of the water causing damage to the home. It is not our obligation to pay for a problem caused by a personal choice in landscaping and a desire for improved aesthetics. This is more aggravating knowing that this resident also runs water into the pond 24 hours a day when the water level is too low. 6321 INTERLACHEN BLVD 6401 INTERLACHEN BLVD Returned Prefer Decorative Street Lights Prefer Traffic Calming Measures Total Surveys Surveys as No Style Yes No Sent Colonial Acom Traditional 22 11 1 10 2.5 2 1.5 6 4 Yo of Returned Surveys 5096 996 91 4 5596 360A Note: 'oustra a Rankin from 1 to 3 - Only 2 retumed surveys included rankings r Z)4-c . P7, ` Z.O a 4 ,CJo. 4-51 c'110 o•, ai .S�;, ce._ �, _`",� S .QKJ S H S� ZJ� cz k/La 52. Ca. S$`g.S SN'L�hS MG- nee." Q 5 S 5 S � W e. darn �2C.- l�_ ne&4 �- Il D afq.es 60 &A- Off as.e Saa PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL SCHAEFER ROAD IMPROVEMENT A -216 CITY OF EDINA STREET PID # LEGAL STREET NO. OWNER ASSESSABLE LOTS LOT BLOCK TOTAL LOTS ASSESSMENT COST A Interlachen Blvd 30 -117 -21- 41.0026 1 1 6321' Boehland, Thomas & IOm 0.333333 $ 3,133.33 30-117 - 21.42.0018 4 1 6401 lAanenson, Vernon 0.333333 3133.33 • Schaefer Rd 30- 117 -21 -41 -0027 2 1 5011 Schultz, Scott & Martha 1 $ 9,400.00 30- 117 -21 -4 "028 3 1 5017 Macneil Pabica 1 9400.00 30- 117 -21 -4 "004 pt 27 5021 Metzger, Franz 1 9,400.00 30- 117 - 21-41- 0030 26 5025 Drobny,Jefty 1 $ 9400.00 30- 117 -21.41 -0029 25 5113 Schulze Richard 1 9.400.00 30- 117 -21 -41 -0002 24 5117 Sanderson, Paul & Janet 1 $ 9,400.00 30- 117 -21 -41-0001 23 5125 Smith Kevin & Pamela 1 9,400.00 30- 117 -21-44 -0004 22 5201 Kyllo, John & Carole 115 9,400.00 30- 117 - 21-44-0055 1 1 5209 Emerson Thomas & Zonelda 1 9,400.00 30- 117 - 21-44-0059 5 1 5217 Glickman Edward 1 8400.00 30- 117 - 21-44-0001 19 5225 Dinwiddle, Harry & Barbara 1 $ 9,400.00 30- 117 -21-43 -0004 14 5224 Weiner Howard 1 9400.00 30- 117 -21 -43-0003 13 5224 lWelner, Howard 1 $ 9,400.00 30- 117 -21- 43-0063 2 1 5200 1 Thomas James & Dianne 1 9,400.00 30- 117 -21 -42-0036 1 1 5152 Schall David & Patricia 1 $ 9 400.00 30- 117 -21 -42-0022 1 1 5016 Young, Evelyn 1 $ 8,400.00 30- 117 -21 -42-0021 2 1 5012 Rich Jeffrey 8 Amy 1 9,400.00 30- 117 -21-42 -0020 1 1 5008 Nelson Jr Bernard & Joan 1 9,400.00 30 -117 -21-42 -0019 5 1 5004 Johnson Roger 1 9,400.001 Westwood Ct 30- 117 -21 -44-0024 1 11 1 6300 Larson, ClUeord & Lucy 0.333333 $ 3.' 20 $ 188 TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 188,000.00 AVERAGE COST PER LOT $ 9,400.00 A- 219 —ASS WO- Feasbft Pagel 1:45PN13/31=05 . w91��1 o� e = FEASIBILITY STUDY — A217 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT `' ay CITY OF EDINA • fY<T)Hn)M >V STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS SCHAEFER CIRCLE MARCH 31, 2005 LOCATION: The Schaefer Circle project includes the neighborhood east of Schaefer Road (see Figure 1). 05 5704 5709 5706 5708 5708 5713 5710 Probed 5712 Boundary 5712 �� 5717 5716 5714 �e 6208 6204 5718 5716 6216 6212 : 6201 800 6209 6217 6213 Og 5804 NN lop 5810 809- 11 Figure 1. Project Area Map Feasibility Study Schaefer Circle Imp. No. A -217 March 31, 2005 INITIATION & ISSUES: The Schaefer Circle project was initiated partially by a resident request to address drainage problems at the east end of the cul -de -sac. The Engineering Department expanded this area and included the neighborhood as outlined in Figure 1 as part of the City's planning process to update the infrastructure within this neighborhood. The following are existing features that present issues in determining the feasibility of the project and are addressed in this report: • Surface rainwater drainage issues • No existing watermain in Schaefer Circle • Residents experience "brown water" problems • Poor condition of existing pavement • Existing landscaping, mailboxes, driveways, etc. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The roadway in this neighborhood was originally constructed in the early 1960's, the sanitary sewer was installed in 1959 and the water services were installed in 1969 and 1977. The roadway width varies ranging from 26 -ft to 29 -ft with no curb and gutter and no sidewalks. The pavement condition varies but is in very poor condition overall (see Photo 1). Photo 1. Existing Pavement Condition Street grades within the neighborhood are relatively flat in the cul -de -sac with a steeper sloping roadway on the west end. Typical features exist adjacent to the roadway such as retaining walls, concrete driveways, landscaping, shrubs, trees and mailboxes. There is some existing storm sewer in the area with isolated surface drainage problems. Currently, no watermain exists in Schaefer Circle. Multiple residents are served from single water service lines and /or from the water main located in Page 2 of 6 Feasibility Study Schaefer Circle Imp. No. A -217 March 31, 2005 Vernon Avenue. Due to multiple residents using a single service that is not looped, some residents experience "brown water' conditions. No sanitary sewer blockages have been reported. Most of the private utilities in this neighborhood are overhead and serve the residents from the back of the properties with the exception of the gas lines, which are buried in the roadway. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: This project involves reconstructing the existing bituminous pavement, installing new watermain, repairing sanitary sewer as needed, and replacing the water services from the new watermain to the curb boxes (valves located at the property lines). A neighborhood informational meeting was held on November 15, 2005 to gather data and answer questions the homeowners had relating to the project. Approximately six residents attended this meeting. A neighborhood survey was sent to learn the favorability of constructing concrete curb and gutters and installing decorative street lights with this project. Input from the survey and comments received throughout the planning of this project have been included in this report as an attachment. The results of the survey are shown in Table 1. Note: * 3 surveys responded and ranked Traditional No. 1 - no others were ranked Table 1. Survey Results The following is a summary regarding the survey results including staff's recommendations: The majority of residents do not prefer new concrete curb and gutter — Reasons to construct concrete curb and gutter in this neighborhood include: concrete curb and gutter tends to be more cost effective over the life of the street, reduces pavement failure, provides safety, controls drainage, provides driveway and traffic control, prevents roadway edge rutting, prevents boulevard damage, and aids cleaning and snow plowing. Although staff recommends constructing concrete curb and gutter in this neighborhood, it is feasible to partially improve the roadway without including concrete curb and gutter with this project. (The cost estimate and assessment amount included in the report do not include curb and gutter costs.) Page 3 of 6 Returned Prefer Curb & Gutter Prefer Decorative Street Lights Total Surveys Surveys Yes No B -HEAD S -MOUNT Yes No Style Sent Colonial Acorn Traditional 8 8 1 7 1 1 2 6 of Returned Surveys 100% 12% 88% 25% 75% Note: * 3 surveys responded and ranked Traditional No. 1 - no others were ranked Table 1. Survey Results The following is a summary regarding the survey results including staff's recommendations: The majority of residents do not prefer new concrete curb and gutter — Reasons to construct concrete curb and gutter in this neighborhood include: concrete curb and gutter tends to be more cost effective over the life of the street, reduces pavement failure, provides safety, controls drainage, provides driveway and traffic control, prevents roadway edge rutting, prevents boulevard damage, and aids cleaning and snow plowing. Although staff recommends constructing concrete curb and gutter in this neighborhood, it is feasible to partially improve the roadway without including concrete curb and gutter with this project. (The cost estimate and assessment amount included in the report do not include curb and gutter costs.) Page 3 of 6 Feasibility Study Schaefer Circle Imp. No. A -217 March 31, 2005 s \� N AW a RIGHT -OF -WAY • The majority of residents do not prefer installing decorative street lighting — Staff does not recommend including decorative street lighting with this project since lighting is not supported by the property owners and a direct benefit to each property for this improvement is difficult to substantiate. The pavement throughout this neighborhood appears to be at the end of its useful life while the costs to maintain and repair the roadways are steadily increasing. Overlaying or seal coating the pavement in this neighborhood is not feasible. The proposed roadway width is 27 -ft, which closely matches the existing width and helps minimize impacts to the surrounding topography and landscaping features (see Figure 2). Trees will be protected and impacts to the trees will be minimized. / q �` • �" 621 �� I U 62176— \ .lob� 1'' _r Figure 2. Proposed Project Layout ,P Staff is continuing to analyze the utility repairs /replacements and will include the needed improvements with the final plans. Other utility activities may include replacement of gas mains within the neighborhood, which is determined and coordinated by the local gas utility company. & EASEMENTS The right -of -way along Schaefer Road is 60 -ft wide (60 -ft radius in the cul -de- sac). All proposed roadway improvements stay within this right -of -way. However, existing City utilities located in Schaefer Circle connect across the properties in the southeast corner of the cul -de -sac to utilities located in Vernon Avenue. No record of an existing easement for these utilities has Page 4 of 6 ;.. Feasibility Study Schaefer Circle Imp. No. A -217 March 31, 2005 been discovered to date. It is anticipated that a permanent drainage and utility easement will be required from the adjacent property owners to install the new watermain in Schaefer Circle and loop it between the existing watermain located in Schaefer Road and Vernon Avenue. The necessary easements will be obtained as required. FEASIBILITY: This project is feasible from an engineering and City standpoint. PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $68,000. The total cost includes indirect costs of 15% for engineering and clerical costs and 7.5% for first year finance costs. The estimated construction cost does not include storm sewer, watermain or utility improvements. New watermain is anticipated to be installed in this neighborhood; however, the final utility improvements will be determined during the final design and will be funded through the respective utility fund. Funding for the entire project will be from a combination of special assessment and utility funds. ASSESSMENTS: A special assessment of approximately $8,500 per residential equivalent unit or assessable lot will be levied against residents adjacent to the neighborhood's roadways (see Figure 3). The justification for assessments is attributed to properties receiving benefit of the new pavement. The assessable lot is based on a detached single family home. A 10 -year payback period for these special assessments is proposed for this project. PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule is feasible from an Engineering standpoint: ATTACHMENTS: Council Orders Public Hearing .......... ..........................March 15, 2005 Receive Feasibility Report ............... ............................... April 5, 2005 Public Hearing .. ............................... ..........................April 19, 2005 Bid Opening ........ ............................... ............................May 2005 Award Contract .......................... ............................... Summer 2005 Begin Construction ..................... ............................... Summer 2005 Complete Construction ... ............................... Fall 2005 /Summer 2006 Note: The schedule is dependent on obtaining an . easement for the watermain. • Information Meeting Attendance List and Comments • Survey Results and Comments • Preliminary Assessment Roll Page 5 of 6 Feasibility Study Schaefer Circle Imp. No. A -217 March 31, 2005 %J I v-r 705 5704 5709 5706 5708 5708 5713 5710 Project 5712 Boundary 5714 5712 �� 5717 ...� ........ ......................•••.•5716 �� "'�••• ...•• 6208 6204 s'•, «�••• 5718 6216 6212 5716 '••.•� ti 6201 •,.••` SCHPEfEiI CIR •••••••••••� • 1800 6209 6217 ••° 6213 ,.••'� 5804 N. •' P, 5810 Figure 3. Preliminary Assessment Map Ltf:] Page 6 of 6 SIGN IN SHEET - INARMATION MEETING Schaefer Circle November 15, 2004 (Please print legibly - Thank you!) Name(s) Address 2. 3. J �. CTS ,�- 4• �,�, GU b 21 it Cry 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 120. Phv"a Cuft irligloy QUESTION / COMMENT CARD gene L . onLerNA mof 1U w('+h d,.rcdl�n Also lcestivm ed tlo ,mod r ,`A slk/l,4 g necv Name M`� as Address (02ol sch.aa' (- Clrc ��- PLEASE PR NT PLEASE PRINT QUESTION / COMMENT CARD r Namur 8 3 r Address l 2-,* 4 50— A aeqe r 0,1'r cje PLEASE PRIN PLEASE PRINT SCHAEFEk. —aRCLE IMPROVEMENT NO. A -217 SURVEY RESULTS NO STREET Returned Preferred Curb & Gutter Decorative Street Lights COMMENTS Survey Yes No B -HEAD S -MOUNT Yes No Style Colonial Acom Traditional 6201 SCHAEFER CIR X X X 6204 SCHAEFER CIR X X X 6208 SCHAEFER CIR X X X X 1 We are very interested in burying the power lines. 6209 SCHAEFER CIR X X X X 1 We are in favor of a new street - perhaps C&G, but not upgrade every one elses waterline. We would not benefit from it. We hooked up to city water directly from Vernon and no one on our street helped pay for it. 6212 SCHAEFER CIR X X X I would prefer that this project not take place at all. Resurfacing the road would be fine, but I am totally against the water and utility improvement part of the project. 6213 SCHAEFER CIR X X X Letter attached. 6216 SCHAEFER CIR X X X 1 I am on a comer lot and would probably have to pay once for Schaefer Cir and then again for Schaefer Rd construction. The darkness is most upsetting. It is dangerous and a security risk. Thank you. 6217 SCHAEFER CIR X X I X Total Surveys Returned Prefer Curb & Gutter Prefer Decorative Street Lights Survey Yes No B -HEAD S-MOUNT Yes No Style• Sent Colonial Acorn Traditional 8 8 1 7 1 1 2 6 0 0 1 % of Returned Surveys 100% 112.50% 87.50% 25% 75% Note:' 3 surveys responded and ranked Traditional No. 1 - no others were ranked - _!" - Hasbargen 6213 Schaefer Circle Edina, MN 55436 952 - 932 -0877 Mr. Steven L. Lillehaug Edina Traffic Engineer /Assistant Engineer City Hall 4801 west 50*" Street Edina, MN 55424 rte: Improvement No. A -217 Schaefer circle Dear Mr. Lillehaug: This is in reference to the above mentioned road improvement on Schaefer circle. For the record, we are against the improvements mentioned in your letter, dated December 9, 2004. For a'road, which has limited traffic, the amount mentioned for this project seems outlandish. we are also hard pressed to understand why resurfacing the road is not covered by our taxes. we are also not in favor of the curb and gutter improvement and the streetlight. it seems to us, these two improvements are out of character with the surrounding neighborhood. we have no rainwater drainage issues. Further, we are unaware of any thing that has changed drainage in the neighborhood. if the issue of drainage is arising because there are issues with those who live at the end of the cul- de -sac, these issues do not impact the rest of the circle and should be addressed as so. The geography of our neighborhood hasn't changed at all. This is not an issue. Thank you for taking the time to read our comments. we appreciate keeping us up to date on these issues and will wait to hear from you in the near future. J very truly yours, Donald and Terese Hasbargen PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL SCHAEFER CIRCLE IMPROVEMENT S -217 CITY OF EDINA STREET PID # LEGAL STREET NO. OWNER LOT BLOCK LOTS ASSESSMENT COST A Schaefer Cir 31- 117 -21- 14-0020 6 1 6216 Walsh, James, Helen, & Mary 1 $ 8,500.00 31- 117 -21- 14-0070 76 ptS 1 6212 Gaarder, Timothy 1 $ 8,500.00 31- 117 -21- 14-0023 pto 1 6208 Gaasedelen. James & Claudia 1 $ 8,500.00 31- 117 -21- 14-0024 9 1 6204 Hardg, Paul & Mari 1 $ 8,500.00 31- 117 -21. 41-0023 13 1 6201 Lasky, Michael 1 $ 8,500.00 31- 117 - 21.41.0024 14 1 6209 Totall Gary & Helen 1 $ 8,500.00 31- 117 -2141 -0025 15 1 6213 Hasbar en, Donald & Terese 1 $ 0,600.00 31- 117 - 2141-0026 16 1 6217 Juno, Klaus & Jody 11 8,500.00 8 $ 88.000.00 TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 68.000.00 AVERAGE COST PER LOT $ 8,500.00 A217 Assessments-FeasEY'ry Page 1 1:47 PM=12005 1:4 ok e r FEASIBILITY STUDY - BA328 Nail �o ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT •,ti�ry��KC. CITY OF EDINA STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS WEST 58TH STREET APRIL 1, 2005 LOCATION: The West 58 l Street project extends from Concord Avenue to Wooddale Avenue (see Figure 1). Doll )16 rn N N in O O O (M CD U-) r` �''� 4DU1 N N N N �- (D 'JI LO 4601 `r v v a 't v LO v v Lo v v 5615 5640 18 5633 5619 It o (0 N cc) v 5704 4620 4616 4608 4604 4600 N 4516 4512 5623 Ir 4524 v 5656 4629 (D 'JI LO 4601 5701 4505 5700 a v m° Nt It 5700 5705 It o (0 N cc) v 5704 5705 5704 4630 v (0 v (0 4600 5708 5712 5709 5708 CONCORDTER 5713 5710 —5713 5712 5713 ty c2 o 0 4601 Project 5717 5'_ boundary 717 5716 5717 5721 5724 5721 5720 5721 O v CO v N v CO (0 d (0 O 572-------------- 28 5725 5754 ■ ■■ .■. W 58TH ST w 5801 5800 W 5801 5800 �w 5801 5800 ■W 5801 5800 a 5805 5804 a 5805 5804 a 5805 5804 a 5805 5804 0 5808 0 5809 5808 = 5809 5808 a 5809 5808 z 5809 5812 U 5813 5812 01 5813 5812 a 5813 00 5817 5816 a 5817 5816 5817 5816 LL 5817 5812 5821 5820 5821 5820 5821 5820 5821 5820 5825 5824 5824 5825 5824 5825 5829 5828 5825 5828 5829 5828 5829 5828 5833 5832 5833 5832 5833 5832 5833 5832 5837 5836 5837 5836 5837 5836 5837 5836 5840 5841 5840 5841 5840 5841 5840 5841 5844 5845 5844 5845 5844 5845 5844 5901 5900 5901 5900 5901 5900 5901 5900 5905 5904 5905 5904 5905 5904 5905 5904 Figure 1. Project Area Map a J O 0 °o 3 � N v v I Feasibility Study West 58th Street Imp. No. A -204 April 1, 2005 INITIATION & ISSUES: The West 58th Street project was initiated by the Engineering Department as part of the Five -Year Capital Improvements Program, which is part of the City's planning process to update the critical infrastructure within this neighborhood as outlined in Figure 1. The following are existing features that present issues in determining the feasibility of the project and are addressed in this report: • Surface rainwater drainage and storm sewer issues • Sump pump discharging directly onto street • Sanitary sewer and watermain deficiencies • Poor condition of existing pavement • Existing landscaping, driveways, etc. • Existing overhead utility lines and poles • Existing mature trees • Existing lighting EXISTING CONDITIONS: West 58`h Street is part of the City's designated Municipal State Aid Roadway System (MSA). The street and utilities in this neighborhood were originally constructed in the 1950's with a storm sewer improvement in 1979. The roadway width in this neighborhood is approximately 30 -ft with intermittent curb and gutter and no sidewalks. The pavement condition varies throughout the neighborhood but is in very poor condition overall (see Photo 1). Photo 1. Existing Pavement Condition Page 2 of 7 „Feasibility Study West 58th Street Imp. No. A -204 April 1, 2005 The speed limit on this roadway is 30 mph and currently no parking restrictions are posted along West 58`h Street. Street grades within the neighborhood vary slightly but are relatively flat and level. There is some existing storm sewer in the area, but overall the surface drainage is very poor. Other typical items exist adjacent to the roadway such as concrete driveways, landscaping, shrubs, trees and fences. Most of the private utilities in this neighborhood are overhead (with the exception of the gas lines). Street lighting consists of standard "cobra head” lights mounted on wood poles that are typically located at the intersections. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: This West 58`h Street project involves the following improvements: • Reconstructing the existing bituminous pavement. • Constructing new concrete curb and gutter, driveway aprons, and sidewalk. • Retaining walls (lannon stone) • Installing new decorative street lighting. • Repairing /replacing the watermain where needed. • Replacing fire hydrants. • Repairing_ the sanitary sewer where needed. • Updating and extending the storm sewer to accommodate the new concrete curb and gutter. • Installing drain tile where needed to allow the property owners to connect their sump pump discharges directly into the storm sewer system. A neighborhood informational meeting was held on November 22, 2005 to gather data and answer questions the homeowners had relating to the project. Over 14 residents attended this meeting. Additionally, a neighborhood survey was sent to learn the favorability of widening the street to obtain the necessary roadway width (to allow on- street parking versus restricting parking) and installing decorative street lights with this project. Input from the survey and comments received throughout the planning of this project have been included in this report as an attachment. The results of the survey are shown in Table 1. Total Surveys Surveys Prefers Decorative Street Lighting Prefers Street Widening (Parking Allowed Sent Returned Yes No Style Yes No Colonial I Acorn I Traditional 19 1 12 7 4 2.00 11.57 1 1.50 1 1 10 % of Returned Surveys 1 63% 58% 33% 1 1 1 8% 83% Table 1. Survey Results Page 3 of 7 Feasibility Study West 58th Street Imp. No. A -204 April 1, 2005 The following is a summary regarding the survey results including staff's recommendations: • The majority of residents prefer installing decorative street lighting — Staff recommends including decorative street lighting with this project (see Figure 2). Figure 2. Decorative Lighting — Traditional (latern) Style • The majority of residents do not prefer widening the street by 2 -ft to accommodate on- street parking — Staff recommends constructing the street to a 32 -ft width between Concord Avenue and St. Johns Avenue to meet MSA standards, which accommodates one lane of parking. This will allow on- street parking for those residents that directly front West 58th Street. The roadway will be constructed to MSA standards. The proposed roadway widths range from 28 -ft with no parking and 32 -ft with parking allowed on one side of the street (see Figure 4). Parking is proposed to be allowed only on the north side of West 58th Street between Concord Avenue and St. Johns Avenue. This area consists of the properties that front directly on West 58th Street — All other properties front on the side streets where on- street parking is available. Parking is proposed to be restricted in all other locations along West 58 "' Street in the project area. The varying roadway widths accommodate the neighborhood by minimizing impacts to the surrounding topography. Trees will be protected and impacts to the trees will be minimized. Staff recommends installing a barrier style curb and gutter as it will work well with the existing topography within this neighborhood (see Figure 3). A barrier style curb provides the best control of water runoff and better defines the roadway while providing protection to the sod and pavement edge from snowplow damage in the winter months. B618 C ❑NC CURB & GUTTERS 6' {� R1/2' R 3' I AT tS ' R 3' 6' 4' PE R f T 7 RASE j • r 7 1/2' 18' i 8' - Figure 3. Typical Barrier /Bulkhead Curb and Gutter Page 4 of 7 Feasibility Study West 58`h Street Imp. No. A -204 April 1, 2005 6 F-7 11 a 0, U rj Z O U 2 14 ,MR RIGHT -OF -WAY W 58TH ST W 58TH ST Figure 4. Proposed Project Layout The pavement throughout this neighborhood appears to be at the end of its useful life while the costs to maintain and repair the roadways are steadily increasing. Overlaying or seal coating the pavement in this neighborhood is not feasible. Staff is continuing to analyze the utility repairs /replacements and will include the needed improvements with the final plans. Other utility activities usually include replacement of gas mains within the neighborhood, which is determined and coordinated by the local gas utility company. & EASEMENTS The right -of -way along West 58th Street is typically 60 feet wide. All proposed improvements stay within this right -of -way and no additional easement requirements are anticipated. Page 5 of 7 Feasibility Study West 58th Street Imp. No. A -204 April 1, 2005 FEASIBILITY: This project is feasible from an engineering and City standpoint. PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $357,000 (this amount includes $40,000 for decorative lighting). The total cost includes indirect costs of 15% for engineering and clerical costs and 7.5% for first year finance costs. The estimated construction cost does not include utility improvements. Sanitary sewer, storm sewer and watermain work is anticipated in this neighborhood; however, the final utility improvements will be determined during the final design and will be funded through. the respective utility fund. Funding for the entire project will be from a combination of special assessment and utility funds. ASSESSMENTS: A special assessment of approximately $68 per assessable front foot is proposed for this project and will be levied against the residents adjacent to West 58th Street. This assessment will cover 20% of the roadway reconstruction costs. The funding the City receives through the State Gas Tax for maintenance and construction of roadways will fund the remaining portion of this cost. The justification for assessments is attributed to properties receiving benefit of the new pavement, concrete curb and gutter, and the addition of decorative street lighting. The assessable front foot is based on Hennepin County 1/8 Section maps and includes property that abuts the West 581h Street right -of -way. Properties that abut this right -of -way with their backyard or sideyard will be assessed at 1/3 of the assessable front footage rate. A 10 -year payback period for these special assessments is proposed for this project. 'A tabulated preliminary assessment roll is attached to this study and a summary of this assessment roll is shown in Figure 5. PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule is feasible from an Engineering standpoint: ATTACHMENTS: Council Orders Public Hearing .......... ..........................March 15, 2005 Receive Feasibility Report ............... ............................... April 5, 2005 Public Hearing .. ............................... ..........................April 19, 2005 BidOpening .................................... ............................... May 2005 Award Contract ..... ............................... ...........................June 2005 Begin Construction ............................... ...........................June 2005 Complete Construction ....................... .........................Summer 2006 • Information Meeting Attendance List and Comments • Survey Results and Comments • Preliminary Assessment Roll Page 6 of 7 Feasibility Study West 58th Street Imp. No. A -204 April 1, 2005 5611 `O v (D ~ °-' N "' 4501 316 N (D N o 0 o cfl N " v v v 5615 `r a v v v in� v 5640 318 5633 5619 CD 4620 4616 4608 4604 4600 " 4516 4512 5656 5623 �t 4524 't 4629 `O v (D ``' v rn 1p (D 46015700 5701 4505 5700 5705 (0 5704 v o c0 N 00 v 5705 5704 4630 v v t � v v 4600 5708 5712 5709 5708 CONCORDTER 5713 5716 5713 5712 °0 5713 iv ~ 'r o 0 4601 N v v v v 5717 5720 5717 5716 5717 N - O O - 5721 5724 5721 5720 04 5721 - (D (D (D It (D , `0 5725 5728 ` 5725 5754 J N v W 58TH ST 5801 5800 w 5801 5800 w 5801 1 5800 r 5801 5800 580 w a 5805 5804 a' 5805 5804 'a 5805 5804 w 'a 5805 5804 w ¢ 580 0 5808: o 5809 5808 = 5809 5808 a 5809 5808 a 580 z 5809 5812' 0 5813 5812 ° 5813 5812 a 5813 °0 581 ° 5817 581 a 5817 5816 N 5817 5816 LL 5817 5812 0 581 5821 582 5821 5820 5821 5820 5821 5820 3 582 5825 5824 5824 5825 5824 5825 582 5829 582$ 5825 5828 5829 5828 5829 5828 582 5833 5832 5833 5832 5833 5832 5833 5832 583 5837 5830 5837 5836 5837 5836 5837 5836 583 5840:, 5841 5840 5841 5840 5841 5840 584 5841 5844 5845 5844 5845 5844 5845 5844 584 5901 5900 5901 5900 5901 5900 5901 5900 590 5905 5904 5905 5904 5905 5904 590 ' 590 5909 5908 5909 5908 590 o _�. ° 590 5908 � •5.,° 5913 5912 5913 5913 5912 591 591 Figure 5. Preliminary Assessment Map Page 7 of 7 v. •z2 2oc� vL yq Oilc nC1avt ce ) It S 8 S+ Ctr "c.ard -io WaL->J d a I-c ) AMC GaRD. e. - W I _ram t_ o S_ro CY z.--t SO r y to;16L f. 1055 h Am .. B- O P—w_ K I f G4-- Acid re s s 51a8 F-/,I Rz FAY o-iC, <-o ak �7ZS'SvL JG �� s rRLx Ave. ,,dot Ashcrocfhe. y6o() 14J. s QUE TION / COMMENT CARD a Q�orei w2 4/�u f%UadC a� w „��er� e.✓ S a� a rea, Name Address �S PLEASE RINT PLEASE PRINT QUESTION / COMMENT CARD lLL cm rn V\ t of ` 'n tp Gab6ir� �0.�on Name Cox 4n d r r Address 6-U-5 r•Aa PLEASE PRIN PLEASE PRINT �S,a q)a - lo(oa .Steve Lillehaug From: Wayne Houle Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 4:21 PM To: Steve Lillehaug Subject: FW: 58th Street Improvement Project fyi - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Moira [ mailto :morninglory08ll29 @excite.comI Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 4:10 PM To: Wayne Houle Cc: joshua .olson@provationmedical.com Subject: 58th Street Improvement Project Hi Wayne, Josh & I wish to express our desire NOT to have a "parking bay" located directly across the street from our 5801 Ashcroft Ave. home. We feel that this will invite non - neighbors to park across from us, and thus affect our sense of security. We will be more than happy to try to assist our neighbors in sharing our driveway if they ask us for help at special events, etc., when they may have driveway overflow. We also feel that a parking bay would look extremely odd ... as few, if any, surrounding streets have such a feature. We do not wish our home's curbside appeal to be negatively impacted. Please add this concern to your list of comments on this project. Thank you. Moira & Josh Olson Join Excite! - http: / /www.excite.com 1 'Steve Lillehaug From: Wayne Houle Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 8:31 AM To: 'morninglory081129 @excite.com' Cc: Steve Lillehaug Subject: RE: 58th Street Improvement Project Josh & Moira: Thank you for your comments. Your comments and issues will be addressed and included in the referenced project's feasibility study and presented to the Council for consideration. Thanks Wayne Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 whoule @ci.edina.mn.us 952- 826 -0443 direct 952 - 826 -0390 fax - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Moira [ mailto :morninglory08ll29 @excite.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 3:27 PM To: Wayne Houle Cc: joshua .olson@provationmedical.com Subject: 58th Street Improvement Project Hello Wayne, Thanks again for the informative meeting last evening. Josh & I own 5801 Ashcroft-Ave., and we wanted to point out a serious concern to us, as sidewalk feasability /location is one of the improvements on the table. We have a one -car cement driveway. Last month, we had an asphalt pull -out spot added alongside the east side of the driveway, bumping our total available parking spaces to 3 outside the garage. We spent $1000 in order to make this improvement from 2 to 3 spaces. If a sidewalk is added, we'll be back down to 2 spaces (unless we change our cars to Geo Metros) and won't have a long enough available space to add more. It would look ridiculous to add another spot alongside the 2 existing spaces. As we have 1 14 -year old and a preteen in the family, parking for us will really be at a premium soon. We very much will appreciate you taking our situation into consideration as various sidewalk pros and cons are discussed. Please feel free to contact Moira at 952 - 285 -296F (home) or 952- 992 -5341 (work) to discuss the matter further. Sincerely, 1 Moira and Joshua Olson Join Excite! - http: / /www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! rage t of 1 Steve Lillehaug From: Bob.Stoltz [Bob.Stoltz @target.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 2:17 PM To: Steve Lillehaug Cc: bobnewkirk@mn.rr.com Subject: Comments for 58th St. Improvements Hi Steve - Thank you for the thorough presentation of the proposed road improvements for 58th St. - it was very informative in helping us understand the scope and possible options to consider. I live at 4608 58th St. (one of the "blue" houses) - My comments somewhat reflect the fact that I am one of seven houses that have addresses on 58th Street. My comments /concerns are: • Maintain the mature trees on the north side of 58th (between Concord and St. Johns - I don't recall mature trees on the north side between St. Johns and Wooddale). • Maintain "residential" feel of street - Ideally, reduce the width of the new road relative to the existing road. I would not want the street to resemble Wooddale in terms of width. Wide feels like fast. • Add a sidewalk with a minimal boulevard - The idea being to have "green" between the road and sidewalk so that the sidewalk does not feel like an extension of the road. • No parking on either side of the road. I don't mean to represent my neighbors on this issue, but very seldom does anyone park on the road currently. I think this was reflected in some of the comments last night. My preference is to not make it more inviting to park along 58th (which is what I believe parking "bays" would do). I've attached a sketch that reflects the concerns mentioned above - If the road was reduced to 28 feet in width (from it's current 30 feet) and by shifting the the south edge of the road 2 feet to the south, it would allow the north side to have a boulevard, sidewalk and 3' of existing "green" to the base of the existing trees. An option to consider - The section of road from St. Johns to Wooddale could have a wider boulevard w /trees since there are not existing mature trees on the north side (nor do the houses "front" 58th Street). The road would align the full length, but the sidewalk would "shift" at St. Johns. Not sure if that's allowable or not. Thanks again for your time - let me know if you have any questions or comments! Bob (and Vivian) Stoltz 4608 58th Street West (952) 929 - 3613 11/23/2004 �Ofro -ra be 00 ).0 1kO ��.j ���o�� wc►�� :�� y,� of �� �i�• be PAO - �$ ,, p,► � CanGO�-lo �NO ftaK►nO �o�tNy �(P�IWK _ raPtq --011 foov*v liti ! +10 ! r • J m n Steve Lillehaug From: Steve Lillehaug Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 11:07 AM To: 'Ryan Langsev'; Wayne Houle Cc: Steve Lillehaug Subject: RE: 58th Street West street project Thank you for your comments. Your comments and issues will be addressed and included in the referenced project's feasibility study and presented to the Council for consideration. Thank you. Steven L. Lillehaug, P.E., P.T.O.E. Edina Traffic Engineer /Assistant Engineer Engineering Department 952 - 826 -0445 slillehaug @ci.edina.mn.us City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com (fax) 952 - 826 -0389 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Ryan Langsev [ mailto :rlangsev @mulliganbjornnes.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 10:56 AM To: Wayne Houle Cc: Steve Lillehaug Subject: 58th Street West street project Mr. Houle: Thank you for the informational meeting last evening. I and my family reside at 5801 Concord Avenue. Although we have many concerns regarding the street project as a homeowner, none is more greater than whether the project will address a huge and vexing problem that continues to concern property owners in the western part of this project: stormwater runoff. Current stormwater pipes / utilities in this area do NOT properly handle this significant water concern. Every time the City receives a one -half inch or more of rainfall in a 24 hour period, ponding occurs in the area adjacent to and along Concord Avenue and south of South View middle school where the new high school baseball field is being built. Ponding occurs every time. I am not aware of what steps were taken to address this concern in the recent construction on the south side of the southeast parking lot for the middle school campus. Nonetheless, I do not see how the problem was resolved; if anything, it appears the addition of two more drain outlets to this spot has significantly compounded this problem. Ponding becomes a temporary "lake" for a period of time corresponding to the amount of rainfall: for one -half inch, about one day; greater than one -half to an inch, one day of water, and another day when the field is too soaked for human access; more than one inch,.days of standing water, followed by a day or two when the field cannot handle human traffic. It will be interesting to watch how the Edina High School baseball team attempts to maintain its schedule and host games on this field during a wet spring. As a parent, I would be concerned -whether my child is put in jeopardy playing on a soggy field in an attempt to get all the games played due to postponement from rain. The Edina high school baseball team may begin playing its games and practices on a field which has a reputation in the Twin Cities western suburbs as being a mud field. During the major storm of June 2003 when our area lost power for over three days, the water runoff from the storm went over the sidewalk from the school campus into Concord Avenue and over the eastside gutters onto our property and other properties along the east side of Concord Avenue. Clearly, the stormwater drains do NOT properly handle significant water amounts or prevent such water from causing major structural damage to many houses in the Concord Avenue / 58th Street West area. If this street project is to address all issues for a fifty year period, it MUST fully provide significant storm drainage capacity much greater than its current ability to accomodate water runoff. Water runoff appears to be increasing in volume to the area based upon past history, recent construction, and reporting that our general weather patterns are becoming warmer with more severe weather systems (i.e. greater number of tornados and other systems characterized by torrential rains) . I understand the area water problem may be compounded fundamentally by being located at the end of the water drain system whereby its immediate runoff is partly back -up from and /or a result of all immediate eastern properties runoff which must drain away before the water in this area can finally drain away. It is for these reasons and others that I was puzzled how the City determined it could place its preminent baseball field in this location. My concerns are not meant to address the incredible water problems caused by the 1987 storm. You are well aware as to how high the water levels reached in our area. Nonetheless, I submit that the City will exercise poor business judgment and implement bad decisions of its discretionary capacity in its governmental role if it does not properly address the water runoff in this area in implementation of this street project. The City is certainly'on notice that water runoff in this area is a significant problem. The City Council certainly should not only be fully advised of this problem, but also advised that the project WILL address the issue, and demonstrate to the Council the project's ability to properly correct the significant problem and accommodate the water runoff. I trust you, Steven L. Lillehaug, and your department will address this significant problem in the context of the proposed 58th Street project. Ryan E. Langev 5801 Concord Avenue Edina, MN 55424 (952) 925 -9141 Ryan E. Langeev Mulligan & Bjornnes PLLP 401 Groveland Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55403 (612) 879 -1819 2 Steve Lillehaug From: Gary Williams [gary@SayltsSold.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 9:39 AM To: Steve Lillehaug Subject: FW: November 22, Informational Meeting Edina City Hall - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Gary Williams [mailto:gary@SayItsSold.com] Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 10:26 PM To: 'slillehaug ®edina.mn.us' Subject: November 22, Informational Meeting Edina City Hall Hi Steve Thank you first of all for the very informative meeting tonight. My name is Gerard E. Williams, and I live at 5728 Fairfax Ave. So Edina. I would very much like you to accept my vote to do the reconstruction of 58th street. I would like to see the road decreased to 28 feet wide. I am not in favor of having parking spaces adjacent to my home, as it would not give me much side yard. I would like to see it adjacent to the homes further west as you have it planned, I think it would not only look good but also slow down the speed. I would vote for side walks , even though I believe they would be on my side of the street. Unlike some of the other's I would like to see the extra monies spent to add the nice street lighting, as I think it would add value to the neighborhood. If you have any further comments needed from me I would be happy to share them. I make my living selling Real Estate, and I do know what will help increase the value of homes. If my home faced 58th like the one's west of me I would not hesitate to have parking in front of my home, as it will help future sales value for resale. I would be glad to speak to that fact if you need it. Thank You Gerard E. Williams WEST 58TH STF MPROVEMENT IMPROVEME,.. NO. BA -328 SURVEY RESULTS Returned Decorative Street Lights Widening Street Survey Yes No Style Yes No NO STREET Colonial Acorn Traditional COMMENTS Please se my email of 12/17 for additional comments; if decorative street lights are installed, I think lightpoles should be black, not green. 4600158TH ST W X X 2 3 1 X Thanks. Leave street as is. Add "no parking" signs on one side. Do not destroy 8 blvd treets on no.side. No sidewalk - widen street 2 ft. - parking one 4604 58TH ST W X 1 X side. No to parking. Must retain mature trees. Please go forward with proposed 28 ft. road. 32 ft. section gives impression that road is wider (ala Wooddale) - narrow road with no parking should be only 4608158TH ST W X X 2 1 3 X consideration. Thank you. 4612 58TH ST W 4616 58TH ST W 4620 58TH ST W Such proposed parking is not seen anywhere else in Edina. Its presence would only serve to cheapen the value of our n'hood and promote strangers to park their vehicles on our street. It also eats into the yards and driveways of residents. Having a sidewalk, especially a buffered one is damaging enough as it is. Why is that not a question on the survey? It's known issue (you mention it yourself in this mailing) The choise of whether or not to have a buffer has already been taken out of our hands. I don't appreciate the felling that the entire issue of a sidewalk has been as well. It seems as though you might be more concerned with the city than the citizens, on that issue. I look forward to 5801 ASHCROFT AVE X X 1 X hearing more about the status of a sidewalk. 5800 ASHCROFT AVE I am not in favor of a new sidewalk on the northside of the street. My 5721 CONCORD AVE X X 1 X concern is the trees that could be endangered with a sidewalk. Parking along 58th St. has always been a problem involving traffic flow issues, especially during high volume use activities such as football games. However, I recognize that great deference should be afforded the homeowners on the no.side of 58th between Concord and St. 5801 CONCORD AVE X X 1 X johns. Aves. I would like to see the road from Wooddale to St. Johns reduced by 2' to then be 28' wide. You can then widen from St. Johns to concord to allow for parking. I just don't want from Wooddale to St. Johns 5728 FAIRFAX AVE X X 2 3 1 X widened. 5800 FAIRFAX AVE WEST 58TH STREET IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-328 SURVEY RESULTS NO STREET Returned Survey Decorative Street Lights Widening Street COMMENTS Yes No Style Yes No Colonial jAcom Colonial Traditional I Traditional 57251 FAIRFAX AVE X X 7 1 1 2.00 2 1.50 X 10 58011 FAIRFAX AVE X 33% X 1 8% 83% X No sidewalks. 57251ST JOHNS AVE 5801 IST JOHNS AVE X X 3 1 2 * * *Abstain - I am not impacted by the decsion directly. I am for whatever has the least impact to existing trees considering also the proposed sidewalk. 58001ST JOHNS AVE X X 1 X Want narrow street. 5754 WOODDALE AVE 5800 WOODDALE AVE X X 1 X I am a senior citizen and wonder why or if widening the street is for parking for the new gyms and not residents. I have never noticed the street lights north of 50th on Wooddale, but now that I have, they are dim and look dirty. Totals 19 12 7 4 10 11 12 1 10 2.00 1.57 1.50 Total Surveys Surveys Decorative Street Lighting Preference Street Widening Preference (Parking Allowed Sent Returned Yes No Style Yes No Colonial Acorn I Traditional 19 12 7 4 2.00 1.571 1.50 1 10 % of Returned Surveys 1 63%158% 33% 1 8% 83% Page 1 of 2 Steve Lillehaug From: Bob Newkirk [bobnewkirk@mn.rr.com] Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2004 1:16 AM To: Steve Lillehaug Cc: Bob.Stoltz Subject: More Comments for 58th St. Improvements Steve, Just wanted to let you know that Kristine and I (at 4600 W. 58th St.) support the views outlined in Bob Stoltes note below, as well as the specific plan he attached. I think the major concerns of the residents are: Keep Speeds Down. In this case, that means a narrower road. Parking availability doesn't slow traffic down, because so little parking takes place on this road. Maintain Aesthetics. This means keeping the mature trees, and adding a "boulevard" sidewalk, i.e., one that isn't flush up against the street. 1 would also observe that there is a power line that crosses the street between just west of Woodale that could be buried. Improve Drainage. This all takes place underground, I assume, but the area in general gets a lot of runoff during storms and this issue must be kept front of mind. I do think a sidewalk is in order for the children in the area. We would also be open to nicer street lamps, pending the additional assessment analysis. With respect to parking, I would note that this would only appear to be a practical issue for the residents that have driveways on 58th street. The number of nearby side streets and the double -width driveways on this street mitigate the relatively minor need for parking. I also don't see how there is room to save the mature trees, have a boulevard sidewalk and have parking. One of the three has to go. It's easy for me to say, as our driveway opens on St. John's, but I would choose to eliminate the parking. Thanks again for a good presentation last month. I'm sure the ultimate end product will turn out well. Bob Newkirk 4600 W. 58th St. 952.924.6023 - - -- Original Message --- From: Bob.Stoltz To: slillehaugaci.edina.mn.us Cc: bobnewkirk(amn.rr.com Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 12:16 PM Subject: Comments for 58th St. Improvements Hi Steve - Thank you for the thorough presentation of the proposed road improvements for 58th St. - it was very informative in helping us understand the scope and possible options to consider. I live at 4608 58th St. (one of the "blue" houses) - My comments somewhat reflect the fact that I am one of seven houses that have addresses on 58th Street. My comments /concerns are: 12/22/2004 Page 2 of 2 • Maintain the mature trees on the north side of 58th (between Concord and St. Johns - I don't recall mature trees on the north side between St. Johns and Wooddale). • Maintain "residential" feel of street - Ideally, reduce the width of the new road relative to the existing road. I would not want the street to resemble Wooddale in terms of width. Wide feels like fast. • Add a sidewalk with a minimal boulevard - The idea being to have "green" between the road and sidewalk so that the sidewalk does not feel like an extension of the road. • No parking on either side of the road. I don't mean to represent my neighbors on this issue, but very seldom does anyone park on the road currently. I think this was reflected in some of the comments last night. My preference is to not make it more inviting to park along 58th (which is what I believe parking "bays" would do). I've attached a sketch that reflects the concerns mentioned above - If the road was reduced to 28 feet in width (from it's current 30 feet) and by shifting the the south edge of the road 2 feet to the south, it would allow the north side to have a boulevard, sidewalk and 3' of existing "green" to the base of the existing trees. An option to consider - The section of road from St. Johns to Wooddale could have a wider boulevard w /trees since there are not existing mature trees on the north side (nor do the houses "front" 58th Street). The road would align the full length, but the sidewalk would "shift" at St. Johns. Not sure if that's allowable or not. Thanks again for your time - let me know if you have any questions or comments! Bob (and Vivian) Stoltz 4608 58th Street West (952) 929 - 3613 12/22/2004 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL W 58th St IMPROVEMENT BA -328 CITY OF EDINA STREET PID8 LEGAL STREET NO. OWNER Frontage LOT BLOCK Front Fmtg Side Fmtg Back Fmtg Tofe Assessable Frontage ASSESSMENT COST A Ashcroft Ave 184M&24-31-0060 24 7 Sa01 Bedme, Wirt 135.821 452087 S 3,069.96 19-028-26-31-0098 1 8 6600 Smx, Dorthv 136.9200 46.2057 S 3,0B9.96 Concord Ave 19-028-24-240022 4 1 5721 Bernard, Jaoquallne 116711 38.571 S 2,619.25 1892 8-24-31 -0000 24 8 p123 a 6901 Lanpw, Ryan & Leslie 135.821 1 45.2057 S 3,19.96 Fairfax Ave 19-02 &24.29 -128 4 2 6728 Williams. Gerard 131171 43.7587 S 2.971.47 1902 8-24 - 24-0037 6 3 6725 Ford Gerald It Mderd 128.610 43,2000 S 2.9U67 19-02 8-24-31 -121 24 5 6801 Tremel Joseph 134.121 44.7087 3 3035.99 19-02 8-24-31 -122 1 8 68M Wendt. SteWwnle 136021 45.217 5 31996 19-02 &24240028 5 2 6725 H en, 8 Mellsae 131.2700 43.7587 s 2 871.47 18-02 &24-31 -OD65 0 0 6801 W 6 & EI Amanda 136.821 462007 3 009.96 19-02 &24. 31-0068 1 7 6800 Bar At- & Michele 1366200 46.2057 3 069.94 fflJohns 19-028-24-24M21 12 1 4620 Hndly. Gayle 80.0000 1.MM S 5,432.72 19920-2424.120 11 1 4618 Evaen &Patricia 80.0000 80.0000 6432.72 1992&2424 -0018 10 1 4612 Miar, Jarnvana 8 Gonputana. Ye*d 80.010 1.M00 6432.72 194)2&24249018 B 1 4608 1 Skit; Robed 8 VM- 80.0000 80.0000 I S 6.432.72 1902 8-2424 -0017 1 a 1 4606 E Rl had & Jeenniro 80.0000 6 :11( 5,43272 1942&24240018 1 7 1 4800 Robed & KA tine 78.2700 762700 6,315.24 Wooddakf Ave 1992&2424-0038 4 3 5754 Wind, Jerome 129.BOM 43.2000 $ 2,833.67 1902&24-31-0001 1 6 5800 Kormann, Robert 8 Eliz"h 134.1200 44.717 S 3,035.98 1.051.4057 S 71,400.00 7" Medway PROJECT COST S 317,000.00 demrathre ligtding cost s 40.000.00 total roadwayA ghUrg cod S 357,000.00 Total Assessable Cod (20% assessed! 80% SA) 8 71,41.1 TOTAL ASSESSABLE FTG: 1,051.407 ASSESSABLE COST PER FOOT: S 97.91 W 5111, at 1 ft-IIb_Yeileb Pape 1 2:ee PrN31rJn05 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Steven Lillehaug, PE, PTOE Assistant Engineer Date: April 5, 2005 Subject: Set Public Hearing Dates for: • Bridge Lane & Townes Road Roadway Improvement No. BA -312 • Shannon Drive Roadway Improvement No. BA -329 Recommendation: Agenda Item # IV. J. Consent . Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion ff Approve resolution calling for Public Hearings on May 3, 2005 for roadway improvements to the following: • Bridge Lane and Townes Road (Improvement No. BA -312) consisting of Bridge Lane west of Townes Road and Townes Road between West 48th Street and Bridge Lane. • Shannon Drive (Improvement No. BA -329) consisting of Shannon Drive between Dewey Hill Road and Kemrich Drive. Info /Background: City staff is requesting these street improvements based on the condition of the streets and the necessary utility improvements„ required throughout the neighborhoods. Staff has reviewed these "projects and has determined they are feasible. Feasibility studies will be completed and submitted prior to the Public Hearing. Staff suggests scheduling a Public Hearing on May 3, 2005. G: \Engineering \Improvements \BA312 Bridge Lane and Townes Road\ CORRESPONDENCE \Miscellanious \BA312 -BA329 RR_request for public hearing.doc CITY OF EDINA 3/16/2005 13:15:28 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 1 3/17/2005 -3/1712005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 270018 3117/2006 100608 3M CO HGF0878 1,413.89 SIGN LETTERING 107799 SS34036 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 1,413.89 270019 311712005 100613 AAA 1,610.12 NEW PLATES FOR CARS 107619 031005 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,610.12 270020 3/1712005 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 41.92 107751 452450 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 41.92 270021 3117/2006 102128 AEARO CO. 109.00 SAFETY GLASSES 107467 04173491 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 109.00 270022 311712006 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 125.00 COFFEE 107713 123613 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 125.00 270023 311712006 103357 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO 85.00 CAMERA REPAIR SHIPPING 107801 SVCINVO4433 2210.6235 POSTAGE COMMUNICATIONS 85.00 270024 311712005 101115 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER 89.99 107590 59056 -2/05 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 427.06 107591 6200 -2/05 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 42.28 107592 35334 -2/05 5821.6201 LAUNDRY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 106.13 107593 35320 -2/05 5841.6201 LAUNDRY YORK OCCUPANCY 189.45 107594 35314 -2/05 5861.6201 LAUNDRY VERNON OCCUPANCY 528.29 107595 46 -2/05 1551.6201 LAUNDRY CITY HALL GENERAL 81.20 107715 3695 -2105 5210.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GOLF DOME PROGRAM 49.12 107716 16813 -2/05 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL 1,513.52 270026 3/17/2005 100630 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC. 176.34 COPIER PAPER 107620 157758701 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 176.34 270026 311712005 102171 ANDERSON -JOHNSON ASSOCIATES 13,240.50 ARCHITECT /ENG SERVICES 107468 050540205 47036.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT RENOVATE BRAEMAR PARK FIELD 13,240.50 CITY OF EDINA 3/16/2005 13:15:28 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 2 3117/2005 - 3/17/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No - Subledger Account Description Business Unit 270027 3/17/2006 116465 ANDERSON, TOM - -- 39.98 - UNIFORM PURCHASE 107582 030705 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 39.98 270028 3/17/2005 100595 ANOKA COUNTY 250.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 107469 030705 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 250.00 270029, 3/17/2005 104235 APPLIED MEDIA 100.00 PERFORMANCE 3/24/05 107714 030105 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 100.00 270030 3/17/2005 101977 ARCH WIRELESS 10.96 PAGER 107470 A6096083C 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 10.96 270031 3/1712006 105342 ARNOLD, MATTHEW 91.93 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 107596 030805 1622.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE SKATING & HOCKEY 91.93 270032 3/17/2005 117874 ARTS & CUSTOM PUBLISHING CO. I 295.00 AD 107800 00015753 5210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 295.00 270033 3/17/2005 106471 BACH, KAY 53.00 TRIP REFUND 107717. 031005 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS SENIOR CITIZENS 53.00 270034 3/17/2005 105016 BARBEAU MARKETING GROUP_ INC. - 4,291.05 ABOUT TOWN AD COMMISSION 107597 2005 -1 2210.6123 MAGAZINE /NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 208.90 ABOUT TOWN AD COMMISSION 107598 2005 -2 2210.6123 MAGAZINE /NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 4,499.95 270035 3117/2005 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 965.50 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING 107825 2327354 -131 04287.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN STORM SEWER CONCORD & SCHOOL 965.50 270036 3117/2005 102196 BATTERIES PLUS 10.60 BATTERIES 107471 18- 112908 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 60.67 BATTERIES 107599 18- 113180 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 95.29 BATTERIES, CHARGER 107600 18- 113120 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 3/16/2005 13:15:28 Page- 3 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 125 00 PERFORMANCE 3/31/05 107718 030105 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 125.00 270039 311712005 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 285.70 107551 32568700 R55CKREG LOG20000 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING CITY OF EDINA 107552 32568800 Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 36.84 3/17/2005 -3/17/2005 Check # Date - _ - - - -- - - -- - Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description YORK SELLING 166.56 107554 270037 311712005 5842.5515 102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC. YORK SELLING 1,834.90 103.13 BATTERIES 107472 23061 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 5842.5513 103.13 YORK SELLING 69.00 270038 3/17/2005 107556 101245 BELL, BRUCE 5842.6406 3/16/2005 13:15:28 Page- 3 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 125 00 PERFORMANCE 3/31/05 107718 030105 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 125.00 270039 311712005 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 285.70 107551 32568700 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 37.95 107552 32568800 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 36.84 107553 39664300 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 18.99 107554 39658800 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,834.90 107555 32568900 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 69.00 107556 39658900 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 24.77 107557 39659400 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 173.69 107558 39659200 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 312.80 107666 32569300 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,794.64 270040 3117/2005 101191 BENNEROTTE, JENNIFER 8.05 EXPENSES REIMBURSEMENT 107601 030805 2210.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 79.00 EXPENSES REIMBURSEMENT 107601 030805 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 87.05 270041 3/17/2005 117859 BERGMAN, LURINE 29.58 UNIFORM PURCHASE 107581 030705 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 29.58 270042 3/1712005 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 157.98 OFFICE SUPPLIES 107602 3723100 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING 132.90 OFFICE SUPPLIES 107603 3710900 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 167.67 OFFICE SUPPLIES 107604 3572770 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 130.61- CREDIT 107605 CM3572770 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 37.05- CREDIT 107606 CM3572770 -1 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 18.66 PENS, CORRECTION TAPE 107621 3725560 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 8.59 CD CASES 107622 3716670 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 15.39 TASK FORCE MATERIALS 107623 3737290 1508.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RPC 119.87- RETURN 107624 CM3673360 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 33.52 OFFICE SUPPLIES 107719 3732750 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/17/2005 — 3/17/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 50.18 OFFICE SUPPLIES 107720 3739300 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 64.41- OFFICE SUPPLIES 107721 CM3629210 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 3116/2005 13:15:28 Page- 4 Business Unit ADMINISTRATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 47036.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT RENOVATE BRAEMAR PARK FIELD 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 232.95 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 270043 3/17/2005 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 116335 BLOOMINGTON CHRYSLER JEEP REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 95.25 MIRROR 107473 417223 95.25 270044 3/17/2005 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 1.980.00 SOIL TESTING SERVICES 107474 242438 1,980.00 270045 3/17/2005 117695 BRUENING, CHARLOTTE 29.95 -- ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 107475 030305 29.95 270046 3/1712005 117861 BRUNN, MARY 50.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 107584 030705 50.00 270047 311712005 117867 BUDGET BLINDS -- 1,801.98 VERTICAL BLINDS 107607 PO 8080 1,801.98 270.048 311712006 100681 CATCO 184.16 BRAKE PARTS 107476 3 -69581 204.29 SHOES, SEALS 107625 3 -69897 388.45 270049 311712005 103711 CENTERPOINT ENERGY GAS SERVICE 41.29 107802 1090012 8.103.12 107803 1090002 6,058.20 107804 1089402 14,202.61 270050 3/17/2005 104260 CERTIFIED INTERNATIONAL CORP. 43179 MERCHANDISE 107722 595986 433.79 270051 3/17/2005 100243 CHECKCARE SYSTEMS 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 3116/2005 13:15:28 Page- 4 Business Unit ADMINISTRATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 47036.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT RENOVATE BRAEMAR PARK FIELD 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5311.6186 HEAT POOL OPERATION 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 5620.6186 HEAT EDINBOROUGH PARK 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 477.00 CHECK READER 107477 05030174 -032 5822.6406 177.00 CHECK READER 107477 05030174 -032 1.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING r + CITY OF EDINA 3/16/2005 13:15:28 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 5 3/17/2005 - 3/17/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 477.00 CHECK READER 107477 05030174 -032 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 1,431.00 270052 3/1712006 116363 CHIPPEWA GRAPHICS INC. 310.99 ENVELOPES 107805 6906 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 310.99 270053 311712005 105690 COASTAL TRAINING TECHNOLOGIES 432.12 TRAINING VIDEO 107626 030105 1470.6579 TRAINING AIDS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 432.12 270054 3/17/2005 103171 CORPORATE ADVERTISING & INCENT 12.25 CHAMPIONSHIP HAT 107478 97751 4077.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 12.25 270056 3/1712005 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER - 15.77 DRINKING WATER 107479 449079 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 15.77 270066 3/1712006 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING 65.80 107559 303106 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,363.05 107667 304085 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 54.00 107668 303109ADD 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 974.00 107669 303665 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 19.80 107670 304084 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 978.20 107671 304083 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5,454.85 270057 311712006 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES 2.322.32 CHEMICALS 107627 82700231 -05 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 2,322.32 270058 3117/2005 117864 DYSTE, ANN 25.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 107588 030705 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH STREET GENERAL 25.00 270059 311712005 100739 EAGLE WINE 2,434.06 107672 201777 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 419.39 107673 201781 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4,532.43 107752 201784 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 7,385.88 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/17/2005 - 3/17/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 270060 3/1712005 117870 EARLE BROWN HERITAGE CENTER 974.70 2111/05 TECH IN - SERV 107723 9773 - 119309 1554.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 974.70 270061 311712005 100741 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 3/16/2005 13:15:28 Page- 6 Business Unit CENT SERV GEN - MIS 7,145.10 107560 325233 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 11.00 107561 325232 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,457.55 107562 325226 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 30.80 107563 325225 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 6,378.45 107753 325318 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 11.00 107754 325299 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,822.05 107755 325298 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 19,855.95 270062 3/1712005 117868 ELK RIVER FORD INC. 11,947.00 2005 FORD TAURUS 107628 28410 1190.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ASSESSING 11,947.00 2005 FORD TAURUS 107629 28409 1190.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ASSESSING 23,894.00 270063 311712005 106676 EMEDCO 174.01 SAFETY CONES, SIGNS 107480 210621 -00 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 174.01 270064 311712005 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 32.00 107756 282335 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 32.00 270065 3117/2005 100044 FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE HOSPITAL 777.61 PHARMACY 107630 021005 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 777.61 270066 3/17/2005 100297 FAST FOTO & DIGITAL 23.43 BRAEMAR WEBSITE PHOTOS 107608 T2- 200318 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 23.43 270067 3/17/2005 113720 FASTENER PLACE 122.92 PLOW BOLTS 107631 14898 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 122.92 270068 3/1712005 113987 FISHER, PETER 100.00 EMS CONFERENCE FEE 107632 030805 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 100.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/17/2005 — 3/17/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 270069 3117/2005 102016 FLOWERS OF EDINA 72.42 SYMPATHY 107481 2596 1100.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 72.42 270070 3117/2005 100759 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY 8520 KEYS 107633 736746 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1550.6040 5610.6136 5913.6201 5511.6201 1552.6511 1301.6201 1646.6201 1553.6201 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 1553.6406 1553.6530 HOSPITALIZATION 3/1612005 13:15:28 Page - 7 Business Unit CITY COUNCIL DISTRIBUTION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION LAUNDRY LAUNDRY CLEANING SUPPLIES LAUNDRY LAUNDRY LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CENT SVC PW BUILDING GENERAL MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 85.20 PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 270071 3/17/2005 105599 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO. 5,300.07 DENTAL PREMIUMS 107482 030105 5,300.07 270072 3117/2005 100457 FRASIER, SCOTT 125.00 PERFORMANCE 3/22/05 107724 030105 125.00 270073 311712005 100764 G & K SERVICES 133.94 107844 022805 138.18 107844 022805 322.94 107844 022805 445.32 107844 022805 449.22 107844 022805 529.50 107844 022805 2,019.10 270074 3/17/2005 101931 GEAR FOR SPORTS 2,021.56 MERCHANDISE 107725 10901817 1,539.27 MERCHANDISE 107726 10901848 354.93 MERCHANDISE 107727 10901784 1.654.09 MERCHANDISE 107728 10901858 5.569.85 270076 3/17/2005 100773 GENERAL PARTS INC. 31.09 - PILOT TUBES 107634 650819 31.09 270076 3/1712006 100920 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY - MINNEA 1,285.34 PARTS 107609 022805 1,285.34 270077 3/1712006 101103 GRAINGER 1550.6040 5610.6136 5913.6201 5511.6201 1552.6511 1301.6201 1646.6201 1553.6201 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 1553.6406 1553.6530 HOSPITALIZATION 3/1612005 13:15:28 Page - 7 Business Unit CITY COUNCIL DISTRIBUTION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION LAUNDRY LAUNDRY CLEANING SUPPLIES LAUNDRY LAUNDRY LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CENT SVC PW BUILDING GENERAL MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY OF EDINA 3/16/2005 13:15:28 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 8 3/17/2005 - 3/17/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 516.63 HAND PALLET, TAPE 107483 498 - 607393 -2 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 59.00 TIME DELAY FUSES 107484 495- 525605 -4 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 126.18 BATTERIES 107635 495- 925203 -4 - 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 16.77 GAUGES, FUSES 107806 495- 957927 -9 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 222.63 - GAUGES, FUSES 107806 495- 957927 -9 1551:6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 941.21 270078 3/17/2005 102670 GRAND PERE WINES INC - - -- 900.35 107674 00015329 5862.5513 , COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 900.35 270079 3/17/2005 117666 GREAT LAKES GOLF COURSE PRODUC 379.57 SIGNS 107610 503065 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 379.57 270080 3/1712005 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 931.53 107675 201783 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,798.88 107676 201780 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 61.05 107677 201779 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,668.45 107678 197547 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 97.75- 107679 660974 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 29.40- 107680 661934 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 38.05- 107681 661935 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1.70 107757 201515 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING .85 107758 201750 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 138.06 107759 201788 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD, MIX YORK SELLING 14,533.26 107760 201787 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 83.60- 107761 661635 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 48.70- 107762 661969 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 76.85- 107763 6661970 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 19,759.43 270081 3/17/2005 117871 HAMMERLUND MFG. CO. INC. 838.00 OUTDOOR SIGN MATERIALS 107729 10021 5422.6251 SHARED MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS . 838.00 270082 3/17/2005 116447 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON IN 233.75 CONSTRUCTION ADMIN 107826 13768 05430.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION WATERMAIN EXT - OXFORD & 52ND 233.75 270083 3/17/2005 110973 HANSON SPANCRETE MIDWEST INC. 301.00 PRECAST CONCRETE. 107730 FINAL RET 0.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS PSTF BALANCE SHEE CITY OF EDINA 3/16/2005 13:15:28 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 9 3/17/2005 — 3/17/2005 Check # — Date - -- Amount Vendor/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 30,901.00 270084 3/17/2005 100799 HEDBERG AGGREGATES 50.00 SEMINAR TICKETS 107611 321427 1640.6104 CONFERENCES 6 SCHOOLS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 50.00 270086 3117/2006 115367 HENGEMUHLE, TIM 50.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 107586 030705 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 50.00 270086 3/17/2005 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION 178.30 RADIO ADMIN FEE 107485 25028068 1553.6237 RADIO SERVICE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,479.89 RADIO ADMIN FEE 107486 25028010 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,658.19 270087 311712006 100806 HOBART CORP 236.08 DISHWASHER REPAIR 107731 21316406 5421.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL 236.08 270088 3117/2005 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 79.50 107682 353494 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 79.50 270089 3/1712005 101365 HONEYWELL INC. 375.95 MONITORING SERVICES 107732 3189776 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 375.95 270090 311712005 101040 HOPKINS TOWN & COUNTRY DODGE 17.73 RESISTOR 107487 113905 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 17.73 270091 3/17/2006 102942 HOWARD R GREEN COMPANY 2,709.00 GYMNASIUM TRAFFIC STUDY 107827 47158 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 2,70900 270092 3/1712005 116779 HOWARD'S JEWELRY INC. 242.01 MERCHANDISE 107733 INV17946 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 242.01 270093 3117/2006 101183 INSPECTRON INC. 2,667.50 INSPECTION SERVICES 107488 030205 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 2,667.50 CITY OF EDINA 3/1612005 13:15:28 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 10 3/17/2005 - 3/17/2005 Check -# Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 270094 3/17/2005 116191 INSTY- PRINTS 522.81 NEWSLETTER 107734 69049 2210.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 522.81 270095 3/1712005 104157 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 92.99 2003 CODE ON CD 107489 0896142 -IN 1495.6405 BOOKS & PAMPHLETS INSPECTIONS 92.99 270096 3/17/2005 101861 J.H. LARSON COMPANY 34.03 FUSES 107636 4466308 -01 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 115.81 LIGHTING 107636 4466308 -01 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 149.84 270097 3117/2005 102136 JERRY'S TRANSMISSION SERVICE 28.97 LATCH, DOOR STRIKER 107845 0003549 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 28.97 270098 3/17/2005 102546 JOHN'S AUTO PARTS 426.00 PICK -UP BOX 107490 02449348 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 426.00 270099 3/17/2005 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 2,825.52 107683 1867238 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON,SELLING 217.90- 107684 274610 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 57.70- 107685 274611. 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 6,125.80 107764 1867234 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 204.75 107765 1867231 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 58.85 107766 1867235 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE. YORK SELLING 1,321.80 107767 1867237 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,424.10 107768 1867232 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING - 2,645.33 107769 1867233 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 60.40 107770 1867236 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 680.55 107771 1867230 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 441.41 107772 1867229 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 56.87 . 107773 1867227 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 15, 569.78 270100 3/1712005 104297 K. BELL 191.70 _ ..191.70 MERCHANDISE 107735 0494004 -IN 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CITY OF EDINA 311612005 13:15:28 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 11 3/17/2005 - 3/17/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 270101 3117/2005 106186 KAEDING & ASSOCIATES INC. 224.00 REHABILITATION PROJECT 107637 490308D 05447.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION WM447 WELL #4 4701 SOUTHVIEW 224.00 270102 3/1712005 100841 KEPRIOS, JOHN 58.85 DOG FOOD, SUPPLIES 107638 030905 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 58.85 270103 3/17/2005 100846 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO 3.275.10 107564 428982 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 55.00 107774 429520 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 495.40 107775 429521 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,825.50 270104 3/1712005 117184 LABOSKY, JOE 46.98 UNIFORM PURCHASE 107589 030705 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 46.98 270105 3117/2005 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 177.26 SILICONE SEALANT 107639 2959970 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 177.26 270106 311712005 100853 LEEF SERVICES 34.25 SHOP TOWELS 107612 351202 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 34.25 270107 311712005 117865 LOEW, DOUG 180.50 CARPET INSTALLATION 107613 030705 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 180.50 270108 311712006 106672 LUGER, JEFF 51.09 DOG FOOD. BISCUITS 107736 030905 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 51.09 270109 3/17/2005 112095 MAGIC CARPET SPECIALISTS INC. 271.58 CARPET CLEANING 107492 21605 5841.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS YORK OCCUPANCY 271.58 270110 3117/2005 100865 MAGNUSON SOD 191.76 SAND, AGG, CONCRETE 107643 55743 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDINGS 19.77 MIXED CONCRETE 107644 55772 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDINGS 211.53 3/16/2005 13:15:28 Page - 12 PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY 2.025.70 CITY OF EDINA 771558 R55CKREG LOG20000 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 98.00 107566 771559 Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,887.68 3/17/2005 -- 3/17/2005 107567 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 270111 3/17/2006 114699 MANAGED SERVICES INC. 771343 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 87.33 TOWELS, SOAP 107493 026220 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES -- 420.68 MAR 2005 SERVICE 107494 607084 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 508.01 107570 771344 270112 3/1712006 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 100868 MARK VII SALES 2,316.50 3/16/2005 13:15:28 Page - 12 PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY 2.025.70 107565 771558 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 98.00 107566 771559 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,887.68 107567 771325 5842.5514. COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING .03 107568 771343 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 43.90 107569 771345 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2.194 -05 107570 771344 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,316.50 .107776 773764 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,735.80 107777 772007 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,178.00 107778 772956 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 12,479.66 270113 311712006 102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC 295.00 PHONE CHANGES 107614 23311 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 295.00 270114 3117/2005 100870 MATRX 37.93 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 107642 883733 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 37.93 270115 3117/2005 117868 MCCONVILLE, MARK 25.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 107580 030705 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 25.00 270116 311712006 117865 MCLAUGHLIN INVESTMENTS INC. 1,019.00 HAND TOOLS .107495 823 1480.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SPECIAL OPERATIONS 1.019.00 270117 3/17/2005 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 2.150.50 EAGLE CENTER TRIP 107737 031005 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 2,150.50 270118 3/17/2005 100953 MEDTRONIC PHYSIO CONTROL CORP. 433.38 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 107738 PC607248 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 32.30- CREDIT 107739 PC526933 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 01.08 CITY OF EDINA 3/16/2005 13:15:28 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page- 13 3/17/2005 - 3/17/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 270119 3/17/2005 117872 MEICHELS, JOYCE 52.00 TRIP REFUND 107740 031005 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS SENIOR CITIZENS 52.00 270120 3/1712005 101483 MENARDS 25.30 PAINT 107496 6051 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 79.77 MAILBOXES, NUMBERS 107497 5728 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 123.65 HAND TOOLS 107498 5543 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 92.86 CORDS, LIGHTS, HAMMER 107741 6380 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 48.82 OAK CASING, CHISEL SET 107742 5590 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 31.91 OAK CASING 107743 5737 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 402.31 270121 3/1712005 100882 MERIT SUPPLY 1,492.17 TISSUE, LINERS, CLEANERS 107615 66442 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 1,492.17 270122 3/17/2005 102602 METRO CASH REGISTER SYSTEMS 3,473.22 GREENKEEPER SOFTWARE 107828 59389 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 535.00 PC CHARGE CREDIT CARD SOFTWARE 107829 59549 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 4,008.22 270123 3/17/2005 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME 45.39 STRENGTH CHARGE 107645 0000791599 5915.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS WATER TREATMENT 45.39 270124 311712005 102550 MFAPC 35.00 2005 DUES 107641 030805 1470.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 35.00 270126 311712006 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY 983.69 TISSUE, LINERS, CLEANERS 107616 23367 1551.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 983.69 270126 3117/2005 100692 MIDWEST COCA -COLA EAGAN 289.00 107571 81284354 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 236.70 - 107572 83624186 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 525.70 270127 3/17/2005 116929 MIDWEST HOUSING COLLABORATIVE, 6.527.23 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 107646 030805 1508.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RPC CITY OF EDINA 3/16/2005 13:15:28 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 14 3/17/2005 —3/1712005 Check # Date Amount Vendor/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 6,527.23 270128 3/17/2005 103942 MINN FIRE SERVICE CERTIFICATIO 55.00 FFII CERTIFICATION FEE 107491 030405 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 55.00 270129 311712005 103625 MINNEAPOLIS DEPT. OF HEALTH 73.00 LAB TESTS 107499 2005216 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 73.00 , 270130 311712005 100913 MINNEAPOLIS SUBURBAN SEWER & W 1,020.00 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 107647 32630 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1.020.00 270131 3117/2006 102568 MINNESOTA CHAPTER IAAI 75.00 DUES 107640 030905 1470.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 75.00 270132 3/17/2005 100066 MINNESOTA MAILING SOLUTIONS 117.08 POSTAGE METER TAPES 107807 28419 1550.6235 POSTAGE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 117.08 270133 3117/2005 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER 31.31 STEEL PIPE 107500 0063066 -IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 31.31 270134 3/17/2005 100898 MINVALCO 1.52 GASKET 107501 480095 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1.52 270135 311712005 104973 MOLBERG, BETH 150.00 PERFORMANCE 3/29/05 107744 030105 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 270136 3/1712005 110522 MUNICIPAL BUILDERS INC. 15,199.04 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 107830 031805 05447.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM447 WELL #4 4701 SOUTHVIEW 39,900.05 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 107830 031805 05448.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM448 WELL #16 6301 GLEASON 55,099.09 270137 3/17/2005 117873 NCAFDO 45.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 107808 031005 1490.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PUBLIC HEALTH 45.00 1 ' CITY OF EDINA . 3/16/2005 13:15:28 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 15 3/17/2005 -3/1712005 Check -9 Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 270138 311712005 117863 NEVIN, JOHN 50.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 107587 030705 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH STREET GENERAL 50.00 270139 311712006 104672 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 987.00 107648 757391129 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 29.01 107809 873184124027 1240.6188 TELEPHONE PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL 29.01 107809 873184124027 1553.6188 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 29.01 107809 873184124027 1325.6188 TELEPHONE STREET NAME SIGNS 29.01 107809 873184124027 4090.6188 TELEPHONE STREET REVOLVING 87.03 107809 873184124027 1280.6188 TELEPHONE SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 97.76 107809 873184124027 1301.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 143.52 107809 873184124027 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 151.58 107809 873184124027 1322.6188 TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 169.84 107809 873184124027 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 474.41 107809 873184124027 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 2,227.18 270140 311712005 102551 NFPA 417.45 BROCHURES 107649 3045314Y 1470.6614 FIRE PREVENTION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 417.45 270141 3/1712005 117102 NORTH AMERICAN SALT CO. 998.58 ICE CONTROL SALT 107503 11215207 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 2,912.31 ICE CONTROL SALT 107504 11216028 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 3,910.89 270142 3117/2005 117856 NRC 405.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 107505 030705 5952.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS RECYCLING 405.00 270143 311712005 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 90.60 WRENCH 107506 325842 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 90.60 270144 3117/2005 101439 OLSEN FIRE INSPECTION 330.00 SPRINKLER TEST 107810 2501086 5210.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 330.00 270145 3/17/2006 100315 OMEGA INDUSTRIES 100.90 CHAIN SAW REPAIRS 107650 6622 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation 107745 030405 94.68 CHAIN SAW PARTS 107745 030405 195.58 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS 270146 3117/2005 5822.5513 117860 OPP, BRIAN 107574 8062882 -CM 24.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 107686 8063326 -IN 24.00 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 270147 3117/2005 5822.5513 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC. 107779 8063329 -IN 890.00 SERVICE CONTRACT 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 890.00 107782 270148 3/17/2006 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 100941 PARK NICOLLET CLINIC 107783 2167471 160.00 ACCT 9992000066 50TH ST SELLING 107784 257.00 ACCT 9992000066 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 655.00 ACCT 9992000066 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,072.00 107786 270149 3/1712005 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 2,443.76 29.32- 1,615.60 1,635.00 1,560.42 7,225.46 270160 311712005 100946 PERA 77,723.89 PPEND 318/05 77,723.89 270161 3117/2005 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT; 4,082.55 1.497.95 13.79 - 179.38- 18.66- 779.95 1,210.75 768.13 417.15 119.80 167.05 334.55 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/17/2005 - 3/17/2005 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 107651 4267 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS 107583 030705 5840.6406 107811 83277 5210.6230 GENERAL SUPPLIES 3/16/2005 13:15:28 Page - 16 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL LIQUOR YORK GENERAL SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 107745 030405 1400.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS 107745 030405 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL 107745 030405 1470.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS 107573 8062048 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 107574 8062882 -CM 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 107686 8063326 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 107687 8063327 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 107779 8063329 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 107746 031105 1000.2023 P.E.R.A. PAYABLE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 107688 2174470 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 107689 2174471 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 107690 3314064 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 107691 3314061 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 107692 3314062 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 107780 2174466 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 107781 2174467 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 107782 2174465 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 107783 2167471 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 107784 2167469 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 107785 2174464 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 107786 2174463 2.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING CITY OF EDINA 3/16/2005 13:15:28 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 17 3/17/2005 -3/17/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 161.90 107787 2174462 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 9,427.95 270162 3/17/2006 101110 POLLY NORMAN PHOTOGRAPHY 25.00 HULBERT PHOTO 107652 030905 1100.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY COUNCIL 25.00 270153 3/17/2006 116396 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 15.14 CO2 TANK RENTAL 107507 915687 7413.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF FIRE TOWER 15.14 270154 311712006 102642 PRESTIGE FLAG 363.26 GOLF FLAGS 107617 131855 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 363.26 270155 311712005 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 490.70 107693 201782 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,455.88 107694 201778 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 31.00 107788 201786 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 941.56 107789 201785 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,919.16 270166 3/1712006 100969 PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING ENGINEE 779.60 RADIUM STUDY 107812 03011.10 5915.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER TREATMENT 1,720.00 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYS 107831 03034.16 05427.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PLANT #3 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYST 2,000.00 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYS 107831 03034.16 05425.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PLANT #2 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYST 548.00 CONSTRUCTION PERIOD SERVICES 107832 03012.23 05413.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION WATER TREATMENT PLANT #2 300.00 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYS 107833 03034.17 05425.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PLANT #2 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYST 460.00 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYS 107833 03034.17 05427.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PLANT #3 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYST 5,807.60 270158 311712005 100971 QUALITY WINE 56.38- 107575 522121 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 5,690.40 107575 522121 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 45.65- 107695 524794 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 2,302.92. 107695 524794 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 15,17- 107696 524781 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 1,532.40 107696 524781 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 17,27- 107697 524592 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 1,748.19 107697 524592 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 15.93- 107698 524602 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 1,614.04 107698 524602 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/16/2005 13:15:28 Council Check Register Page - 18 3/17/2005 -- 3/17/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 14.74- 107699 524782 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 742.80 107699 524782 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 20.20- 107700 524783 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 2,037.22 107700 524783 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 23.87- 107790 524666 -00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 1,203.10 107790 524666 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 45.46- 107791 524793 -00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 2,287.93 107791 524793 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 18.85- 107792 524591 -00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 1,911.64 107792 524591 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 13.34- 107793 524806 -00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 1,347.46 107793 524806 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 22,131.24 270159 311712005 101965 QWEST 51.16 952 926 -0092 107508 0092 -3/05 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 565.90 612 E24 -8659 107509 8659 -3/05 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 876.00 612 E01 -0426 107510 0426 -3/05 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 91.08 952 926 -0419 107511 0419 -3/05 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 282.95 612 E24 -8656 107512 8656 -3/05 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 504.60 612 E24 -8657 107513 8657 -3/05 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 282.95 612 E24 -8661 107514 8661 -3105 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 57.46 107515 022805 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 87.88 107515 022805 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 98.48 107515 022805 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 99.15 107515 022805 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 165.08 107515 022805 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 165.95 107515 022805 5610.6188 TELEPHONE ED ADMINISTRATION 193.69 107515 022805 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 218.23 107515 022805 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 237.40 107515 022805 5932.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL STORM SEWER 253.62 107515 022805 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 354.05 107515 022805 5911.6188 TELEPHONE PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER 1,798.68 107515 022805 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 6,384.31 270160 3/1712005 117692 R & B CLEANING INC. 447.30 STAIRWELL CLEANING 107516 1201 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 447.30 270161 3/1712005 117862 RANTA, LIISA 50.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 107585 030705 7.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GEN' R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount 50.00 270162 311712005 99.95 109.65 126.65 126.65 266.05 728.95 Vendor / Explanation 100976 RED WING SHOE STORE SAFETY BOOTS SAFETY BOOTS SAFETY BOOTS SAFETY BOOTS SAFETY BOOTS CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/17/2005 - 3/17/2005 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 107653 7250000251 107653 7250000251 107653 7250000251 107653 7250000251 107653 7250000251 270163 3117/2006 101963 S & S TREE AND HORTICULTURAL S 2,499.99 TREE PRUNING 107834 50771 2,499.99 270164 3/17/2005 100987 SA -AG INC 146.05 FILL SAND 107517 41688 172.67 FILL SAND 107518 41675 318.72 270166 3/17/2006 103369 SANKEY, MOREAU J. 60.44 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 107813 031105 60.44 270166 3/17/2005 116905 SCREENING AND SELECTION SERVIC 38.00 DRUG TESTING 107519 824865 228.00 DRUG TESTING 107520 824655 266.00 270167 3/17/2006 100996 SEH 755.09 ANTENNA REVIEW 107836 0126593 2,889.97 FEASIBILITY STUDY 107837 0126299 6,000.00 FEASIBILITY STUDY 107837 0126299 6,000.00 FEASIBILITY STUDY 107837 0126299 6,000.00 FEASIBILITY STUDY 107837 0126299 1,169.77 TOPO WORK 107838 0126298 86.00 CITY WORKS 107839 0127208 120.00 CITY WORKS 107839 0127208 172.00 CITY WORKS 107839 0127208 215.00 CITY WORKS 107839 0127208 961.75 CITY WORKS 107839 0127208 240.00 CITY WORKS 107840 0126219 273.75 CITY WORKS 107840 0126219 1646.6610 5630.6406 5420.6406 5511.6406 5620.6406 1644.6103 1318.6517 1316.6517 1190.6104 1550.6121 1550.6121 1260.6103 01212.1705.20 05436.1705.20 04297.1705.20 03413.1705.20 05436.1705.20 1325.6103 5910.6103 5932.6103 5913.6103 5922.6103 5910.6103 5922.6103 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 3/16/2005 13:15:28 Page - 19 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES CLUB HOUSE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS EDINBOROUGH PARK PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE SAND GRAVEL & ROCK SNOW & ICE REMOVAL SAND GRAVEL & ROCK SNOW & ICE REMOVAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL M &O VALLEY LN & VIEW - 66TH ST PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO WM PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO ST PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO SS PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO WM STREET NAME SIGNS GENERAL (BILLING) GENERAL STORM SEWER DISTRIBUTION SEWER TREATMENT GENERAL (BILLING) SEWER TREATMENT R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/1712005 -3/1712005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 645.00 CITY WORKS 107840 0126219 5932.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 25,528.33 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5822.5514 270168 3117/2005 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 101000 SIR SPEEDY 20,212.26 PRELIMINARY DESIGN 138.45 BUSINESS CARDS 107618 46606 SIDEWALK INTERLACHEN /BLAKE 20, 212.26 138.45 270169 3/1712006 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC 101002 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS INC _ 38.92 2,119.70 107523 B156022 107701 161611 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 44.12 2.755.75 107524 S135789 107702 161613 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3.73 27.70 107525 S135806 107703 161612 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 74.49 432.70 107526 5135919 107704 161607 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 129.84 27.70 107527 S135962 107705 161608 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 670.57 5,363.55 107528 SF02360 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 270170 3/17/2005 LABOR (CREDIT) 101021 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 173.30 34.90 FUEL 5136075 107521 0072436 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 365.75 34.90 107655 SI36119 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 270171 311712005 101004 SPS COMPANIES 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 322.58 SINKS 107522 51188737.001 1646.6406 211.90 CARTRIDGES 107835 51132423.002 1646.6530 GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS 3/16/2005 13:15:28 Page- . 20 Business Unit GENERAL STORM SEWER CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 534.48 270172 3/1712006 101016 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 20,212.26 PRELIMINARY DESIGN 107841 5211 -3 07091.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN SIDEWALK INTERLACHEN /BLAKE 20, 212.26 270173 3117/2005 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC 38.92 CLAMPS 107523 B156022 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 44.12 SNAP RINGS, WASHERS 107524 S135789 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3.73 CIRCLIPS 107525 S135806 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 74.49 LAMPS 107526 5135919 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 129.84 SPRINGS 107527 S135962 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 670.57 LABOR 107528 SF02360 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 670.57 - LABOR (CREDIT) 107529 SF02406 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 173.30 FILTERS 107654 5136075 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 365.75 GLASS 107655 SI36119 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 830.15 270174 3/17/2005 103976 STEINBACH, BRUCE 65.00 RECERTIFICATION REFUND 107530 030805 0.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK MAINTENANCE r 'AL 3/16/2005 13:15:28 Page - 21 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 21310 WANT AD 107656 760875 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL - - 213.10 270178 3/17/2005 117869 SUNICE 1,439.72 MERCHANDISE 107748 CITY OF EDINA 5440.5511 R55CKREG LOG20000 PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,439.72 Council Check Register 3/1712005 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 3/17/2005 - 3/17/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 65.00 2,760.43 107577 270175 3117/2005 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 100277 STENCILS & MARKETING PROD INC 176.007 107749 170.13 STENCILS, PAINT 107747 16277 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 6.463.13 170.13 270176 3/17/2005 3117/2005 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. 102742 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLAN 451.99 TIRES 107534 10034163 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES 200500770 5913.6180 148.50 TIRES 107535 10034327 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES LIFT STATION INSPECTION 107842 511.58 TIRES 107536 10034208 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES 878.56 1,112.07 270177 3/1712005 3/17/2005 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 116346 TODD COUNTY 3/16/2005 13:15:28 Page - 21 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 21310 WANT AD 107656 760875 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL - - 213.10 270178 3/17/2005 117869 SUNICE 1,439.72 MERCHANDISE 107748 20001925 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,439.72 270179 3/1712005 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 3,878.70 107576 364696 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,760.43 107577 363889 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 176.007 107749 16653 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 6.463.13 270180 3117/2005 102742 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLAN 698.60 WATER LEAK LOCATING 107657 200500770 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 179.96 LIFT STATION INSPECTION 107842 000200500555 5922.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SEWER TREATMENT 878.56 270181 3/17/2005 116346 TODD COUNTY 300.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 107531 030705 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 300.00 270182 3/17/2005 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 74.46 WELDING GASES 107532 468699 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 17.46 DEMURRAGE CHARGE 107658 468701 5913.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 91.92 270183 3/17/2005 117857 TOMKO, DAVE 41.98 UNIFORM PURCHASE 107579 030705 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3117/2005 3/17/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5820.6160 DATA PROCESSING 5840.6160 DATA PROCESSING 5860.6160 DATA PROCESSING 3/16/2005 13:15:28 Page - 22 Business Unit 50TH STREET GENERAL LIQUOR YORK GENERAL VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 1553.6530 . REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS 41.98 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 270184 3/17/2005 FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 101693 TOTAL REGISTER GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 14.20 MONTHLY FTP FILE 107814 18026 1480.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 14.20 MONTHLY FTP FILE 107814 18026 14.20 MONTHLY FTP FILE 107814 18026 42.60 270185 3/17/2005 102175 TRUCK UTILITIES MFG CO 206.26 PUMP MOTOR 107533 0139046 206.26 270186 3/17/2005 102255 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO 38.16 OXYGEN 107659 816403 101.00 OXYGEN 107660 817818 139.16 270187 311712005 100363 U.S. BANK 16.33 107846 031005 48.96 107846 031005 50.02 107846 031005 105.26 107846 031005 217.12 107846 031005 1,213.99 107846 031005 2,413.53 107846 031005 4,065.21 270188 3117/2005 115379 U.S. BANK 175.00 STATE OF THE CITY 107661 030405 1,382.15 TRAINING COSTS 107815 MAR 4 1,557.15 270189 3/17/2005 102026 UNISOURCE 447.89 ABOUT TOWN PAPER 107540 593580110 -- 728.62 ABOUT TOWN PAPER 107541 593065407 1,176.51 270190. 3/17/2005 101053 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY 349.95 P.A. SYSTEM PARTS 107537 848814 349.95 P.A. SYSTEM PARTS 107538 813224 349.95- CREDIT 107539 869989 349.95 5820.6160 DATA PROCESSING 5840.6160 DATA PROCESSING 5860.6160 DATA PROCESSING 3/16/2005 13:15:28 Page - 22 Business Unit 50TH STREET GENERAL LIQUOR YORK GENERAL VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 1553.6530 . REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1480.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SPECIAL OPERATIONS 1480.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SPECIAL OPERATIONS 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 2210.6123 MAGAZINE /NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 2210.6123 MAGAZINE /NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 3/1612005 13:15:28 Page - 23 Business Unit GRILL GRILL GRILL DISTRIBUTION CENT SVC PW BUILDING WATER TREATMENT CENT SVC PW BUILDING PARKING RAMP GOLF DOME PROGRAM GOLF DOME PROGRAM 705.20 107706 111176 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE CITY OF EDINA 1,017.20 R55CKREG LOG20000 111076 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 84.00- 107708 110875 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 139.20 Council Check Register 111073 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.777.60 3/17/2005 - 3/17/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 270191 3117/2005 5862.5513 101908 US FOODSERVICE INC VERNON SELLING 1,801.79 107710 119151 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 69.07 CUST 114300 107750 030105 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 164.65 CUST 114300 107750 030105 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 428.43 CUST 114300 107750 030105 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 662.15 270192 3/17/2005 103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 2,239.49 WATER MAIN REPAIR 107816 9234 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 2,239.49 270193 311712005 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 211.67 PAPER PLATES, UTENSILS 107542 571719 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 211.67 270194 311712005 101064 VESSCO INC. 225.30 PUMP PARTS 107662 33140 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS 225.30 270195 311712005 102004 VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER COM 450.00 ADJUST SPRINKLER HEADS 107663 098332 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS 450.00 270196 3/1712005 102542 WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS /ENG 2.128.00 PARKING RAMP INSPECTION 107843 21- 3239.00 -1 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2.128.00 270197 3/17/2006 101855 WHALEY MARKETING COMMUNICATION 750.00 PR AND GRAPHICS WORK 107817 B -05 -1 5210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER .250.00 UPDATE LOGO 107818 B -05 -02 5210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 1,000.00 270198 3/17/2005 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 3/1612005 13:15:28 Page - 23 Business Unit GRILL GRILL GRILL DISTRIBUTION CENT SVC PW BUILDING WATER TREATMENT CENT SVC PW BUILDING PARKING RAMP GOLF DOME PROGRAM GOLF DOME PROGRAM 705.20 107706 111176 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,017.20 107707 111076 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 84.00- 107708 110875 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 139.20 107794 111073 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.777.60 270199 3/1712005 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 56.11 107709 118732 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,801.79 107710 119151 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation 80.95 - -- --- 1,655.89 1,007.60 4,602.34 270200 3/17/2005 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 132.00 181.00 1nA 95- CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/17/2005 - 3/17/2005 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 107795 119149 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 107796 119150 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 107797 119148 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 270201 311712005 5842.5513 101726 XCEL ENERGY YORK SELLING 107711 26,839.85 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 121.14 162125 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 749.50 107798 162179 5822.5513 141.29 50TH ST SELLING 107546 18822047 227.92 LIGHT & POWER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 107547 12,874.59 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 3,040.31 18993496 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER 62.63 107819 18993615 4086.6185 119.49 AQUATIC WEEDS 107820 18993539 248.30 LIGHT & POWER PONDS & LAKES 107821 42.31 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 4,643.39 18993073 5311.6185 LIGHT & POWER 49,110.72 107823 270202 3117/2005 LIGHT & POWER 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 25.00 FEB USAGE - BLDG 120.24 FEB USAGE - PK & REC 451.99 FEB USAGE - ADMIN 597.23 270203 311712005 104324 YOUNGBLOOD LUMBER CO. 36.64 WOOD PRODUCT 36.64 270204 3/17/2005 101091 ZIEGLER INC 345.00 GENERATOR CONTRACT 345.00 629.78 Grand Total 3/16/2005 13:15:28 Page 24 Business Unit YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 107578 161896 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 107711 162099 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 107712 162125 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 107798 162179 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 107543 18592682 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 107544 18816624 1481.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK FIRE STATION 107544 18816624 1470.6185 LIGHT & POWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 107545 18576288 5932.6185 LIGHT & POWER GENERAL STORM SEWER 107546 18822047 5430.6185 LIGHT & POWER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 107547 18955175 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 107664 18993496 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER 107819 18993615 4086.6185 LIGHT & POWER AQUATIC WEEDS 107820 18993539 5933.6185 LIGHT & POWER PONDS & LAKES 107821 18992564 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 107822 18993073 5311.6185 LIGHT & POWER POOL OPERATION 107823 18990685 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 107548 008352891 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 107549 008352892 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 107550 008352889 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 107824 455090 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 107665 E3809712 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/17/2005 — 3/17/2005 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Check Total 577,629.78 Total Payments 577,629.78 Business Unit 3/16/2005 13:15:28 Page _ 25 3/16/2005 13:20:34 Page- 1 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and procedures dat° 1 7 (. Finance City CITY OF EDINA R55CKSUM LOG20000 Council Check Summary 3/17/2005 - 311712005 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 210,150.93 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 6,394.75 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 15,324.39 04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND 23.102.23 05100 ART CENTER FUND 29.95 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 2,596.20 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 199.41 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 15,843.22 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 3,945.51 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 7,158.85 05800 LIQUOR FUND 152,158.18 05900 UTILITY FUND 100,474.38 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 8,280.68 05950 RECYCLING FUND 405.00 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 31,566.10 Report Totals 577,629.78 3/16/2005 13:20:34 Page- 1 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and procedures dat° 1 7 (. Finance City R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/24/2005 -3/24/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 270205 312412005 101833 A.T.O.M. 625.00 COURSE FEE 107940 2279979 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 625.00 270206 3124/2005 100613 AAA 966.29 LICENSE FOR 70.287 107992 031605 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS 966.29 270207 3/2412005 102234 ABDELLA, PAUL 300.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 108262 031705 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 300.00 270208 3/24/2005 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 27.40 107847 451526 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 37.96 108047 452451 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 30.12 108048 452452 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 37.40 108049 451546 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 132.88 270213 312412005 100614 ACE SUPPLY CO. INC. 199.41 PIPE, INTAKE, CAULK 107875 640183 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 199.41 270214 3/2412005 104225 ADAMS, DAVE 69.98 UNIFORM PURCHASE 108102 031605 1301.6201 LAUNDRY 69.98 270215, 312412005 102191 ADVANCED GRAPHIC SYSTEMS INC. 255.60 TONER 107936 INV00059843 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 255.60 270216 312412005 102128 AEARO CO. 89.00 SAFETY GLASSES 107876 04181955 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 164.00 SAFETY GLASSES 107877 04181959 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 124.00 SAFETY GLASSES 107878 04181953 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 377.00 270217 3/2412005 101077 AIRTEC INC. 317.11 DRILL BITS, CUTOFF WHEELS 107879 294627 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES 317.11 270218 3/2412005 111228 ALDEN POOL & MUNICIPAL SUPPLY 3/23/2005 15:33:52 Page - 1 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING POOL OPERATION GENERAL MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/2412005 —3/24/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 175 19 SPRINGS 108210 500119 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES. PROFESSIONAL ,SERVICES REPAIR PARTS PRINTING GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CHEMICALS GENERAL SUPPLIES 3/23/2005 15:33:52. Page - 2 Business Unit WATER TREATMENT ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 800 MHZ RADIO 800 MHZ RADIO 800 MHZ RADIO EDINBOROUGH PARK CITY HALL GENERAL 175.19 270219 3124/2005 103357 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO 383.40 VIDEOTAPES 108171 INV59909 1120.6406 383.40 270220 312412005 100867 ALSTAD, MARIAN 698.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 108263 031705 5110.6103 698.00 270221 312412005 100624 ALTERNATOR REBUILD CO. 126.24 ALTERNATOR 107993 37060 1553.6530 126.24 270222 3/24/2005 116301 AMERICAN COLOR GRAPHICS 2,323.29 SPRING & SUMMER CATALOG 107937 36591 5110.6575 2,323.29 270223 3124/2005 100630 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC. 892.97 COPIER PAPER 107880 157807201 1550.6406 892.97 270224 312412005 101874 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC. 178.00 TRAVEL CHARGERS 107938 40412 1400.6406 178.00 270225 3124/2005 117824 ANDREW CORPORATION 15.98 DELIVERY FEES 108103 7431245 44003.6710 24,435.19 MIKOM SERVICEWDELIVERY 108104 7436944 44003.6710 78,442.15 MIKOM (FAIRVIEW HOSPITAL) 108105 7447401 44003.6710 102,893.32 270226 3/2412005 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. - 55.37 DE, ACID 108186 26435 5620.6545 55.37 270227 3/24/2005 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 426.49 COFFEE 107939 6013 -457919 1551.6406 426.49 270228 3/24/2005 103857 ASATO, SHEILA GENERAL SUPPLIES. PROFESSIONAL ,SERVICES REPAIR PARTS PRINTING GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CHEMICALS GENERAL SUPPLIES 3/23/2005 15:33:52. Page - 2 Business Unit WATER TREATMENT ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 800 MHZ RADIO 800 MHZ RADIO 800 MHZ RADIO EDINBOROUGH PARK CITY HALL GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/23/2005 15:33:52 Council Check Register Page - 3 3/24/2005 3/24/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 880.00 WORKSHOP 108264 031705 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 880.00 270229 3/24/2005 102134 ASHWORTH INC. 772.24 MERCHANDISE 107881 488811 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 772.24 270230 3/24/2005 102817 ASSOCIATED BAG COMPANY 193.11 PLASTIC PERMIT BAGS 107882 X666562 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 193.11 270231 3/24/2005 104069 B.B. WATSON GRAPHIC DESIGN 575.10 BUSINESS CARDS 107941 421 1400.6575 PRINTING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 575.10 270232 312412005 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 320.04 BATTERIES 108211 18- 115383 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 320.04 270233 312412005 117081 BCG CONSTRUCTION 9,576.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 4 107883 031805 10084.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS W 51ST & HALIFAX FED SIDEWALK 9,576.00 270234 312412005 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 1,821.00 107848 32658600 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,068.00 107849 32658500 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 59.25 107850 39696500 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 323.80 107851 32658300 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 27.00 107852 39693900 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 197.95 107853 32658400 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 185.00 107854 32658700 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 124.99 107855 39694100 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 120.72 108050 39694000 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLO MIX YORK SELLING 1,431.00 108051 32658800 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 69.24- 108052 39691400 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5,289.47 270235 3/24/2005 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 18.49 OFFICE SUPPLIES 107942 3729790 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 29.15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 107943 3729700 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 45.78 APPOINTMENT BOOK 107944 3720630 5610.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ED ADMINISTRATION 24.09- RETURN 107945 CM3723100 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/23/2005 15:33:52 Council Check Register Page - 4 3/24/2005 -3/2412005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 23.95 OFFICE SUPPLIES 107994 3734120 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 45.97 OFFICE SUPPLIES 107995 3751700 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 101.02 OFFICE SUPPLIES 107995 3751700 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FINANCE 7.60 OFFICE SUPPLIES 107996 3753490 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING 11.77 FOLDERS 107997 3734830 1470.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 16.31 MARKERS, SHEARS 108106 3749140 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 24.48 WEEKLY PLANNER 108107 3749400 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 300.43 270236 3/24/2005 105116 BJB ART STUDIO INC 270.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 108265 031705 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 270.00 270237 3/24/2005 101375 BLOOMINGTON SECURITY SOLUTIONS 16.49 SECURITY KEYS 108212 S41258 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 16.49 270238 312412005 101010 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 123.55 SWITCHES 107884 94262562 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 123.55 270239 3/24/2005 117998 BOSCH, LELAN 76.98 REIMBURSEMENT 107998 031605 2210.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 76.98 270240 3/24/2005 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 522.27- CREDIT 107885 712711 C 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 217.58 STRAP ASSEMBLIES 107886 718782 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 18.11 CAP SPINDLES 107887 718672 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 19.08 MUFFLER PIECE 107888 725704 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 172.84 HINGE 107889 15858SAV 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 108.39 CLAMPS, PEDAL ASSEMBLIES 107890 726379 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 79.47 SENDER ASSEMBLY 108213 725424 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 59.32 ROLLERS, SPRING EYES 108214 727727 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 65.18 CHAIN RACK 108215 728406 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 18.49 ROLLERS 108216 728781 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 236.19 - 270241 3/2412005 105254 BOYERS BLADES 20.00 SAW BLADE 108217 . 2005004 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 20.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 1,192.00 CITY OF EDINA 270247 3/24/2005 Council Check Register 3/24/2005 -3/24/2005 TRACTOR PARTS Check # Date Amount Vendor! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 270242 3/2412005 S08094 103239 BRIN NORTHWESTERN GLASS CO. REPAIR PARTS 117.48 1,509.90 DOOR REPAIRS 108108 582873 5841.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 3/24/2005 240.00- CREDIT 108109 582873CR 5841.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,269.90 FITTINGS, COUPLERS 107892 3 -69194 1553.6530 270243 3/24/2005 104595 BUCKENTINE, JOHN COUPLERS, VALVE KIT 108001 3 -70318 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 99.48 UNIFORM PURCHASE 107891 031105 1646.6201 LAUNDRY 3 -70348 1553.6530 99.48 56.74 PIGGY BACK 270244 3/2412005 1553.6530 102398 BUDGET PROJECTOR REPAIR 12.82 LAMP 108004 65.00 REPAIRS 107946 2608 5125.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 12.16 HOSE ASSEMBLY 65.00 3 -70489 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 270245 312412005 BRAKE 102365 BURTON GOLF INC 3 -70628 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 3/2312005 15:33:52 Page - 5 Business Unit YORK OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY BUILDING MAINTENANCE MEDIA STUDIO 368.68 GOLF BAGS 108218 162122 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 368.68 270246 3/24/2005 102046 CAMPE, HARRIET 1,192.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 108266 031705 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,192.00 270247 3/24/2005 100679 CARLSON TRACTOR & EQUIPMENT 13.49 TRACTOR PARTS 107999 S08272 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 103.99 TRACTOR PARTS 108000 S08094 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 117.48 270248 3/24/2005 100681 CATCO 144.17 FITTINGS, COUPLERS 107892 3 -69194 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 388.27 COUPLERS, VALVE KIT 108001 3 -70318 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 252.68 MOTOR 108002 3 -70348 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 56.74 PIGGY BACK 108003 3 -70411 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 12.82 LAMP 108004 1 -33065 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 12.16 HOSE ASSEMBLY 108219 3 -70489 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 68.17 BRAKE 108220 3 -70628 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 935.01 270249 3/24/2005 102372 COW GOVERNMENT INC. 826.74 TONER, DRUM KITS 108110 RD67445 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 828.74 270250 3/2412005 116353 CHIPPEWA GRAPHICS INC. 909.97 ENVELOPES 108172 7015 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CITY OF EDINA 3/2312005 15:33:52 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 6 3124/2005 —3/24/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 909.97 270251 3124/2005 118007 CHONG, AESON 112.80 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 108173 031805 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 112.80 270252 3124/2005 102691 CHRISTOFFER, KELLI 89.41 ART SUPPLIES 108174 031805 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 89.41 270253 3/24/2005 102123 CIT GROUP /COMMERCIAL SERVICES, 105.64 MERCHANDISE 107893 303417 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,418.60 MERCHANDISE 107894 303772 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,524.24 270254 3/24/2005 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 4,939.34 WATER ANALYSIS 108221 031705 5915.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER TREATMENT 4,939.34 270255 3/2412005 100688 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERVICES INC 14.38 WINDOW CLEANING 107895 351279 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS VERNON OCCUPANCY 16.62 WINDOW CLEANING 107895 351279 5821.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 27.04 WINDOW CLEANING 107895 351279 5841.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS YORK OCCUPANCY 58.04 270256 312412005 116304 CLAY, DON 567.50 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 108267 031705 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 567.50 270257 3/24/2005 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 430.44 GLOVES, HARD HATS 108005 02526076 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 430.44 270258 3/24/2005 - 118000 CUSTOM SIGNS/TOM BAHR 1,341.90 CEDAR T -SIGNS 108006 1447 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,341.90 270259 3124/2005 111057 D.A.R.E. AMERICA MERCHANDISE 60.60 DARE MATERIALS 107947 MN -40853 1425.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DARE 60.60 270260 3124/2005 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation DISPENSER BAGS 250.00 2,670.20 Page - 7 270266 3/2412005 100730 38.40 6,754.15 LEGAL PO # Doc No 20.80 Account No Subledger Account Description 270267 312412005 1,063.75 EAGLE WINE 836.66 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 800.00 399.10 304082 5862.5515 842.65 VERNON SELLING 107870 304984 460.00 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 108053 400.00 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,339.10 304522 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 53.00 108055 304965 5822.5514 8,687.90 50TH ST SELLING 270261 3/2412005 5862.5514 100713 DAY - TIMERS INC. VERNON SELLING 108300 99.02 DESK ARMORHIDE SET COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 99.02 304985 270262 3/24/2005 VERNON SELLING 118011 DESIGN IMAGING GROUP 304986 5862.5515 30.00 LANDSCAPE SOFTWARE 108187 54192336 30.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES 270263 3/24/2005 16397 -02 106022 DEVANT LTD GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL TURF CARE 663.07 MERCHANDISE 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 663.07 108224 270264 3124/2005 ADVERTISING OTHER 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST 108224 025089504000 90.70 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 108224 122.60 5420.6188 270265 3/24/2005 100420 DOGGIE WALK BAGS 250.00 DISPENSER BAGS 250.00 Page - 7 270266 3/2412005 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 6,754.15 LEGAL PO # Doc No 6,754.15 Account No Subledger Account Description 270267 312412005 100739 EAGLE WINE 836.66 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 399.10 304082 5862.5515 CITY OF EDINA 3/2312005 15:33:52 Council Check Register Page - 7 3/24/2005 -3/24/2005 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 107856 304081 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 107857 304082 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 107870 304984 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 108053 304974 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 108054 304522 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 108055 304965 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 108056 304646 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 108300 305311 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 108301 304985 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 108302 304986 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 108187 54192336 5610.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ED ADMINISTRATION 108222 16397 -02 1643.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL TURF CARE 108223 168609 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 108224 025089504000 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 108224 025089504000 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 108224 025089504000 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 108224 025089504000 5610.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 107948 200503073 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 108225 1223666 1195.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES 108057 205067 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 108058 205073 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA 3/23/2005 15:33:52, R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 8 3/24/2005 —3/24/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 657.41 108059 205070 .5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING _ 10.36- 108060 662043 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 8.28- 108061 662055 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,874.53 270268 3/24/2005 100741 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 4,295.40 108062 325300 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,938.15 108143 325395 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,972.80 108303 325396 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,837.80 108304 325409 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 13,044.15 270269 3/24/2005 116186 ECHO PROJECT 900.00 ECHO PROJECT 108007 2005 -7 4204.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HEALTH ALERT NETWORK 900.00 270270 3124/2005 118012 ECKLUND, MATTHEW 153.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 108268 031705 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 153.00 270271 3/24/2005 100742 ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION DIVISI 141.65 PEST CONTROL 108188 4335088 5630.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES 141.65 PEST CONTROL 108189 4240139 5630.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES 283.30 270272 3/24/2005 106340 EDINA CAR WASH 264.12 FEB WASHES 107949 2052 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 264.12 270273 3/24/2005 103261 EDINA CLEANERS 28.90 LINEN CLEANING 108190 100513915 5620.6201 LAUNDRY EDINBOROUGH PARK 28.90 270274 3/24/2005 101341 EDINA FIREFIGHTER'S RELIEF ASS 3,000.00 FIRE RELIEF ASSOC 108008 031605 1400.4218 POLICE AID 1% POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 426,471.00 FIRE STATE AID - 2004 108008 031605 1400.4218 POLICE AID 1% POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 429,471.00 270275 3/24/2005 102955 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS 120.66 FEB 13 FIELD TRIP 108175 05 -010 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 120.66 CITY OF EDINA 3/23/2005 15:33:52 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 9 3/24/2005 -3124/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 270276 3/2412005 102340 EDMUNDS, LIZ 98.35 107858 769 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 98.35 108144 768 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 196.70 270277 3/2412005 118010 EGAN, BILL 50.00 BEAVER REMOVAL 108226 001 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 50.00 270278 3/2412005 105758 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE 6.10 REPAIR 108227 RP031505 -3 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 6.10 270279 3/24/2005 115080 ENO, SARA 100.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 108269 031705 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 100.00 270280 3/24/2005 105339 ENRGI 1,857.50 WEBSITE CONSULTING 108111 2539 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 200.00 WEBSITE CONSULTING 108176 2551 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 2,057.50 270281 3/2412005 102357 ENVIROMATIC CORPORATION OF AME 374.28 CLEAN EXHAUST /HOOD 108140 122792 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL 374.28 270282 3124/2005 117436 ERNST, MARCIA 155.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 108270 031705 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 155.00 270283 3/2412005 100756 FEDERAL EXPRESS 36.47 SHIPPING CHARGES 107950 5- 411 -63391 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 36.47 270284 3/2412005 101432 FERRELLGAS 357.63 PROPANE 107951 00011464 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 357.63 270285 3124/2005 104474 FILTERFRESH 326.65 COFFEE 108009 94743 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 326.65 207.77 CLEANING SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TELEPHONE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 3,920.00 CITY OF EDINA 3/23/2005 15:33:52 R55CKREG LOG20000 3/24/2005 108632 GALLES CORPORATION 285.95 MIRACLE CLEAN 107896 Council Check Register 1470.6511 Page - 10 285.95 3/24/2005 —3/24/2005 270291 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 270286 3/2412005 107952 101475 FOOTJOY 1400.6103 110.00 99.78 SHOES 108112 3275600 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES " 117.11 SHOES 108113 3277020 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 10905244 5440.5511 216.89 2,096.85 270287 3124/2005 270293 105202 FORNER, MARY 101867 GETSINGER, DONNA 140.00 ADAPTIVE STAFF 108177 031805 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 140.00 270294 270288 3124/2005 104652 GILLIS, LOUISE 100760 FOWLER ELECTRIC 260.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 375.48 ENGINE 108010 61316400 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 375.48 270295 3/2412005 101146 GLOBAL CROSSING TELECOMMUNICAT 270289 3/24/2005 103039 FREY, MICHAEL 2n7 77 108297 9006454867 1550.6188 1,540.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 108271 031705 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 2,380.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 108271 031705 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 207.77 CLEANING SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TELEPHONE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 3,920.00 270290 3/24/2005 108632 GALLES CORPORATION 285.95 MIRACLE CLEAN 107896 1086688 1470.6511 285.95 270291 3/2412005 102419 GARDEN & ASSOCIATES INC 110.00 INTERPRETER 107952 40352 1400.6103 110.00 270292 3/24/2005 101931 GEAR FOR SPORTS 2,096.85 MERCHANDISE 108228 10905244 5440.5511 2,096.85 270293 3124/2005 101867 GETSINGER, DONNA 288.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 108272 031705 5110.6103 288.00 270294 3/24/2005 104652 GILLIS, LOUISE 260.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 108273 031705 5110.6103 260.00 270295 3/2412005 101146 GLOBAL CROSSING TELECOMMUNICAT 2n7 77 108297 9006454867 1550.6188 207.77 CLEANING SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TELEPHONE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/24/2005 -3/24/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 270296 3/2412005 101156 GOPHER SIGN CO. 3 646 56 SIGN POSTS 107897 00062796 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS 3/23/2005 15:33:52 Page - 11 Business Unit STREET NAME SIGNS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FINANCE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL DISTRIBUTION GENERAL MAINTENANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 3,646.56 270297 312412005 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC. 272.70 FEB 05 SERVOCE 107898 5020310 5913.6103 272.70 270298 3/24/2005 102383 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS AS 135.00 MEMBERSHIP 108178 0007117 -2005 1160.6105 135.00 270299 3/24/2005 100781 GRAFIX SHOPPE 275.00 MOTORCYCLE GRAPHICS 107953 40001 1400.6215 275.00 270300 3/24/2005 101103 GRAINGER 60.09 FILE SET, BEVEL, TAPE 107899 495- 878655 -2 1301.6556 92.64 3 -PHASE LINE MONITOR 107900 495 - 163662 -2 1400.6406 147.61 FILE SETS, TAPPING TOOL 107901 495 - 254843 -8 5913.6406 38.53 FUSE BLOCKS 107902 973 - 518487 -2 1301.6406 128.92 DOOR CLOSER 107903 495 -010256 -8 5410.6406 5.11 COVERS 108114 495 -451556 -7 5111.6406 88.10 PLUG, RECEPTACLE 108115 495- 451554 -2 5111.6406 213.94 CROSS VISES 108116 498- 216358 -8 5422.6556 50.57 BATTERIES, DRILL KIT 108191 498- 137472 -3 5620.6406 27.75 SOCKET SET 108192 498 - 137473 -1 5620.6556 853.26 270301 3/24/2005 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 1,801.50 108063 71309 5842.5513 507.00 108145 71404 5862.5513 375.75 108305 71405 5822.5513 2,684.25 270302 312412005 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE 15.98 2 KEYBOARDS 108117 031605 5840.6406 63.69 CELL PHONE CHARGES 108117 031605 5841.6188 79.67 270303 3/2412005 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 168.48 LIGHT BULBS 108193 907448258 5620.6406 3/23/2005 15:33:52 Page - 11 Business Unit STREET NAME SIGNS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FINANCE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL DISTRIBUTION GENERAL MAINTENANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK CITY OF EDINA 3/23/2005 15:33:52 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 12 3/24/2005 -3/24/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 168.48 270304 3/24/2005 102125 GREG LESSMAN SALES 1,720.07 MERCHANDISE 107904 29645 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,720.07 270305 3124/2005 102688 GRIFFITHS, GEORDIE 50.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 108274 031705 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 50.00 270306 3/24/2005 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 3.40 107859 197756 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,005.70 - 108064 205076 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 126.14 108065 205075 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 8.50 108066 204810 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 50.89 108067 205072. 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 28.00- 108068 662404 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,526.02 108306 205069 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 123.40 108307 203503 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,816.05 270307 3/2412005 100787 GRUBER'S POWER EQUIPMENT 3,860.63 LAWN TRACTOR. 107954 3077 1650.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 3,860.63 270308 3/24/2005 100791 HALLMAN OIL COMPANY 252.14 OIL 108229 147680 5911.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER 252.14 270309 3/2412005 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION . 1,706.42 RADIO LEASE 107905. 25028009 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 48.61 TRANSACTION PROCESSING 108011 25027173 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 53.63 TRANSACTION PROCESSING 108011 25027173 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,808.66 270310 3124/2005 102460 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 1,688.15 ASSESSMENTS PROCESSING 107955 44720 4001.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WORK CAP REVENUES 1,688.15 270311 3/24/2005 104332 HILL, PRISCILLA 1,380.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 108275 031705 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,380.00 CITY OF EDINA 3/23/2005 15:33:52 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 13 3/24/2005 -- 3/24/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 270312 312412005 100805 HIRSHFIELD'S 16.36 VARNISH, PUTTY STICKS 107906 003965920 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 116.38 PAINT 108194 011761654 5620.6532 PAINT EDINBOROUGH PARK 132.74 270313 3/24/2005 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 103.80 107860 353496 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 377.50 107861 353495 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 481.30 270314 312412005 105461 HOLL, SHELLEY 370.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 108276 031705 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 370.00 270315 3/24/2005 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS 162.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 107956 031505 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 162.00 270316 3/24/2005 102114 HUEBSCH 101.93 TOWEL & RUG CLEANING 108195 218902 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 101.93 270317 3/24/2005 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 57.51 TUBING 108230 381569 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 57.51 270318 3/2412005 100818 INTERSTATE COMPANIES INC. 42.49 PLUG ASSEMBLIES 108012 00159676 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 42.49 270319 3/24/2005 105530 ISD #271 230.00 'THE PERFECT SHOW" 108118 031605 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 230.00 270320 3/2412005 101861 J.H. LARSON COMPANY 243.50 ELECTRIC CONNECTORS, PLUGS 108013 4464631 -02 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 243.50 270321 3124/2005 100830 JERRY S PRINTING 3,025.67 2005 GOLF BROCHURE 108014 31728 5410.6575 PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION 3,025.67 270325 3124/2005 103654 JOHNSON, DENISE 512.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 512.00 Subledger Account Description PRINTING 3/23/2005 15:33:52 Page - 14 Business Unit ADAPTIVE RECREATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING Council Check Register YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 3/24/2005 -3/24/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 270322 3/2412005 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 102146 JESSEN PRESS COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 724.20 AR&LE BROCHURE 108179 50833 1629.6575 50TH ST SELLING 724.20 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 270324 3/24/2005 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,874.02 107862 1867228 5822.5513 3,952.14 107863 1867240 5862.5512 30.94 107864 1867241 5862.5515 1,942.36 108146 1870616 5862.5513 186.20- 108147 275725 5842.5512 100.94- 108148 276140 5822.5512 83.70- 108149 275727 5842.5513 70.80- 108150 275726 5842.5512 80.85- 108151 275724 5842.5513 135.45- 108152 275723 5842.5512 5.51- 108153 276144 5842.5513 56.95- 108154 276139 5842.5513 125.70- 108155 276141 5842.5512 9.65- 108156 276146 5862.5513 18.30- 108157 276145 5862.5513 10.35- 108158 276143 5862.5513 4,231.13 108308 1870618 5862.5512 966.34 108309 1870617 5862.5512 1,319,28 108310 1870612 5842.5512 3,233.24 108311 1870613 5842.5512 581.85 108312 1870608 5822.5513 845.65 108313 1870610 5822.5512 196.01 108314 1870609 5822.5512 109.95 108315 1870607 5822.5512 2,339.62 108316 1867239 5862.5512 95.60 108317 1870619 5862.5515 127.33- 108318 276142 5862.5512 20,706.40 270325 3124/2005 103654 JOHNSON, DENISE 512.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 512.00 Subledger Account Description PRINTING 3/23/2005 15:33:52 Page - 14 Business Unit ADAPTIVE RECREATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 108277 031705 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 270326 3/24/2005 102603 JONAS, LENORE 360.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 108278 031705 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 360.00 3/2312005 15:33:52 Page - 15 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION SENIOR CITIZENS 70.00 107871 429665 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,362.05 107872 429664 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1.222.15 108319 429922 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 270331 3/24/2005 101935 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC. CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 7.479.35 PROLASER III 107957 226169 1400.6710 7.479.35 Council Check Register 270332 3/24/2005 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 3/24/2005 —3/24/2005 Check # Dale Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 270327 3/24/2005 118013 KAIROS DANCE THEATRE SCREWS 108016 2983614 1325.6406 50.00 AD 108279 031705 5110.6122' ADVERTISING OTHER 5913.6406 50.00 664.69 270328 3/24/2005 3/24/2005 101340 KOCHENASH, RICK 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 504.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 108280 031705 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 1470.6104 504.00 20.00 270329 3/2412005 3124/2005 105887 KOESSLER, JOE 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 146.00 MARCH SERVICE 108119 030105 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1260.6104 146.00 20.00 270330 3/24/2005 312412005 100846 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO 117407 LEXISNEXIS 3/2312005 15:33:52 Page - 15 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION SENIOR CITIZENS 70.00 107871 429665 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,362.05 107872 429664 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1.222.15 108319 429922 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 270331 3/24/2005 101935 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC. 7.479.35 PROLASER III 107957 226169 1400.6710 7.479.35 270332 3/24/2005 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 314.18 HEX NUTS 108015 2983615 1325.6406 336.10 SCREWS 108016 2983614 1325.6406 14.41 CAP SCREWS 108120 2988147 5913.6406 664.69 270333 3/24/2005 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 20.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 108231 1 -000020246 1470.6104 20.00 270334 3124/2005 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 20.00 WORKSHOP REGISTRATION 107907 031405 1260.6104 20.00 270335 312412005 117407 LEXISNEXIS 110.00 BACKGROUND CHECKS 107958 0502250166 1400.6230 110.00 270336 312412005 1112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ENGINEERING GENERAL SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 3/23/2005 15:33:52 Page - 16 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING ANIMAL CONTROL 2,200.80 107873 774003 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER CITY OF EDINA 24.80 R55CKREG LOG20000 774004 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,357.50 108320 773787 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING Council Check Register 108321 773789 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING .05 3/24/2005 -3/24/2005 773786 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 896.24 108324 107865 175705 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 131.98 755.88 108069 176109 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 270341 312412005 1,652.12 100870 MATRX 270337 3/24/2005 101741 M. SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS INC. 108017 884372 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 15.00 WINE SPECTATOR 108121 543850 5822.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 884686 1470.6510 15.00 370.00 270338 3/24/2005 101648 MACA 270342 3/24/2005 100875 MCCAREN DESIGNS INC. 30.00 DUES- TIM HUNTER 107959 031105 1450.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 1,578.33 .PLANTS 30.00 30345 5620.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS 270339 3124/2005 PLANTS 100868 MARK VII SALES 30507 5620.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS 3/23/2005 15:33:52 Page - 16 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING ANIMAL CONTROL 2,200.80 107873 774003 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 24.80 107874 774004 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,357.50 108320 773787 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 24.80 108321 773789 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING .05 108322 773786 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 85.25 108323 773788 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 627.53 108324 776104 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK CENT SVC PW BUILDING MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 5,320.73 270340 3/24/2005 101030 MATHISON CO. 39.08 PAPER CHARCOAL WHITE 107960 592060 -0 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 72.10 BRUSHES 107961 592462 -1 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 20.80 CHAMOIS 107962 590792-0 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 131.98 270341 312412005 100870 MATRX 244.00 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 108017 884372 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 126.00 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 108018 884686 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 370.00 270342 3/24/2005 100875 MCCAREN DESIGNS INC. 1,578.33 .PLANTS 108196 30345 5620.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS 607.05 PLANTS 108197 30507 5620.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS 2,185.38 270343 3/24/2005 101483 MENARDS 487.55 RATCHET, CABINETS 108019 7936 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 340.10 CHAIRS, VACUUM, CONDUIT 108122 7933 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 94.72 RE -BAR, TROWEL 108232 8730 1646.6556 TOOLS ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK CENT SVC PW BUILDING MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS BUILDING MAINTENANCE CITY OF EDINA 3/23/2005 15:33:52 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 17 3/24/2005 -3/2412005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 87.06 WIRE, KNEE PADS, HINGES 108233 8909 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 81.95 CLAMPS, VISE GRIPS 108234 8964 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,091.38 270344 3/24/2005 101987 MENARDS 36.85 TIMER, TOOLPOUCH 108198 64929 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 58.73 HEATER, SENSOR 108235 52909 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 81.91 CLEANER, BULBS 108236 66661 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 43.45 STRIPPER, BULBS 108237 65926 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 17.47 GROUT, BRUSH 108238 69323 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 238.41 270345 3/24/2005 100882 MERIT SUPPLY 216.20 DEGREASER, GLASS CLEANER 108020 66482 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 472.86 TOWELS, TISSUE 108021 66481 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 689.06 270346 3/24/2005 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 255.49 SOCCER NETS 108239 81332 1621.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 255.49 270347 3124/2005 100885 METRO SALES INC 641.00 COPIER MAINTENANCE 107908 175311 5410.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION 641.00 270348 3124/2005 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME 275,767.36 SEWER SERVICE 107963 0000791976 5922.6302 SEWER SERVICE METRO SEWER TREATMENT 275,767.36 270349 3/24/2005 104650 MICRO CENTER 33.61 TECH SUPPLIES 108298 848088 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 40.44 TECH SUPPLIES 108298 848088 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 10.19- CREDIT 108299 854578 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 63.86 270350 3124/2005 100019 MIDWEST ART FAIRS 47.70 CONSIGNMENT SALES 107964 3795 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 47.70 270351 3/24/2005 100692 MIDWEST COCA-COLA EAGAN 204.00 107866 83627163 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 204.00 3123/2005 15:33:52 Page - 18 Business Unit PARK ADMIN. GENERAL DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD DISTRIBUTION 1,530.00 LICENSING FEES (17) 107965 030905 1400.6104 CITY OF EDINA POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 270358 3/24/2005 101996 MINNESOTA TROPHIES & GIFTS Council Check Register 110.44 PLAQUES 108023 103852 312412005 —3/24/2005 FIRE DEPT. GENERAL Check # Date Amount Vendor/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 270352 3/2412005 102873 MILLER, SUSAN 70.00 SPORTS TURF SEMINAR 108024 APRIL 6 59.64 CELL PHONE CHARGES 108180 031805 1600.6188 TELEPHONE 59.64 270360 3/24/2005 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 270353 3/24/2005 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT TORO WORKMAN VEHICLE 108123 450403 -00 5400.1740 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT GOLF BALANCE SHEET 13,322.96 431- 0005.300 107966 031005 5913.6601 WATER PURCHASED EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2.74 13,322.96 108125 452015 -00 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 270354 3/24/2005 108126 100913 MINNEAPOLIS SUBURBAN SEWER &W REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 240.00- CREDIT ON ACCT 108127 1,020.00 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 107909 32634 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,020.00 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 107910 32637 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 2,040.00 270355 3/24/2005 102137 MINNESOTA ELECTRICAL ASSOCIATI 275.00 DUES - DAN MCMAHON 108022 12456 -2005 1280.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 275.00 270356 3/24/2005 101376 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT 117.75 PIGGY -BACK NUTS 107911 0162795 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 117.75 270357 3/24/2005 100231 MINNESOTA POST BOARD 3123/2005 15:33:52 Page - 18 Business Unit PARK ADMIN. GENERAL DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD DISTRIBUTION 1,530.00 LICENSING FEES (17) 107965 030905 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,530.00 270358 3/24/2005 101996 MINNESOTA TROPHIES & GIFTS 110.44 PLAQUES 108023 103852 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 110.44 270359 3124/2005 105921 MSTMA 70.00 SPORTS TURF SEMINAR 108024 APRIL 6 1642.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIELD MAINTENANCE 70.00 270360 3/24/2005 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 15,774.63 TORO WORKMAN VEHICLE 108123 450403 -00 5400.1740 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT GOLF BALANCE SHEET 441.91 BELTS, PULLEYS, FILTERS 108124 451944 -00 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2.74 CAP WASHER 108125 452015 -00 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 19.34 GREENSMOWER PARTS 108126 450633 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 240.00- CREDIT ON ACCT 108127 022505 1640.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 15,998.62 R55CKREG LOG20000 107968 909583317 -039 CITY OF EDINA TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 237.03 108199 425483229022 Council Check Register EDINBOROUGH PARK 880.18 3/24/2005 —3/24/2005 270369 3/24/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 270361 3124/2005 1400.6203 118008 MU PERFORMING ARTS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 39.99 500.00 PARADE ENTERTAINMENT 108181 031805 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 500.00 298.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 108282 031705 5125.6103 270362 3/24/2005 298.00 101108 NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE 270371 3/24/2005 113.95 FILTER SET, DEVELOPER 107967 0302501VRXJ 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 113.95 270363 3/2412005 103267 NATIONAL GOLF FOUNDATION 225.00 DUES 108025 1032214 - 2005 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 225.00 270364 3/2412005 100012 NATIONAL WATERWORKS INC. 332.62 SEWER PIPE 107912 2133306 5923.6530 REPAIR PARTS 332.62 270365 3/2412005 106334 NELSON, PEGGY 411.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 108261 031705 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 411.00 270366 3/2412005 100922 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS 1,062.34 SIGN BLADES 108026 TI- 0137689 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS 1,062.34 270367 3/24/2005 103632 NEXT DAY GOURMET /SUPERIOR PROD 510.86 PIZZA OVENS 108036 6330429 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 510.86 270368 3124/2005 104672 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 3/23/2005 15:33:52 Page - 19 Business Unit SPECIAL ACTIVITIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION COLLECTION SYSTEMS MEDIA STUDIO STREET NAME SIGNS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 643.15 107968 909583317 -039 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 237.03 108199 425483229022 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 880.18 270369 3/24/2005 101359 NIBBE, MICHAEL 39.99 UNIFORM EXPENSE 107969 031505 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 39.99 270370 3/24/2005 101958 NICOL, JANET 298.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 108282 031705 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 298.00 270371 3/24/2005 101729 NORMAN, POLLY R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/24/2005 --3124/2605 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 60.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 108283 031705 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 3123/2005 15:33:52 Page - 20 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1553.6583 TIRES S& TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1553.6180. CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1495.6103 5110.6103 14.63 TYPEWRITER RIBBON, PAPER 60.00 278915874- 001 5410.6513 270372 3124/2005 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY 270378 3/24/2005 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 21.24 FLEXWAX, RUBBER LATEX 107970 31055300 400.00 RIGGING SEMINAR 14.58 CANVAS TACKS 107971 30990101 388.73 SAWZALL COMBO KIT 35.82 327409 1646.6556 270373 3/24/2005 108241 100930 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO. 5913.6406 406.59 SPANNER BELTS 596.42 TIRES, SERVICE 108027 NW -94582 2,298.20 CHAIN SLINGS 119.90 SCRAP TIRE DISPOSAL 108028 NW -94719 240.56 CHAINS & HOOKS 103.49 SERVICE 108029 NW -94689 630.92- CREDIT 819.81 327665 1553.6556 270374 3/24/2005 102557 NTOA 270379 3/24/2005 105738 ORIENTAL ART SUPPLY 1,180.00 TRAINING COURSES 107972 031405 509.13 ART SUPPLIES 1,180.00 9974 5120.5510 270375 3/24/2005 116114 OCE 140.00 MARCH MAINTENANCE 107913 984796219 140.00 270376 3/24/2005 100729 ODLAND, DOROTHY 480.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 108284 031705 - 480.00 270377 3/24/2005 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 3123/2005 15:33:52 Page - 20 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1553.6583 TIRES S& TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1553.6180. CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1495.6103 5110.6103 14.63 TYPEWRITER RIBBON, PAPER 108030 278915874- 001 5410.6513 14.63 270378 3/24/2005 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 400.00 RIGGING SEMINAR 108128 327519 1281.6104 388.73 SAWZALL COMBO KIT 108240 327409 1646.6556 58.42 HANDLE, PRY BAR 108241 327655 5913.6406 406.59 SPANNER BELTS 108242 326652 1470.6406 2,298.20 CHAIN SLINGS 108243 327553 1553.6556 240.56 CHAINS & HOOKS 108244 327611 1553.6556 630.92- CREDIT 108245 327665 1553.6556 3,161.58 270379 3/24/2005 105738 ORIENTAL ART SUPPLY 509.13 ART SUPPLIES 107973 9974 5120.5510 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS TOOLS TOOLS TRAINING BUILDING MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/2412005 —3/24/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 509.13 270380 3/24/2005 100247 ORLANDI STATUARY CO. INC. 39.20 EGYPTIAN MASK 107974 02417097 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 39.20 270381 3/2412005 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC. 3/23/2005 15:33:52 Page - 21 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,035.00 MONITOR INSTALLATION 108246 82707 5210.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 1,035.00 270382 3/2412005 117993 P & H SERVICES 120.05 SQUAD RADAR REPAIR 107975 10707 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 120.05 270383 3/24/2005 102440 PASS, GRACE 816.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 108285 031705 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 816.00 270384 3124/2005 115083 PATTINSON, WALT 210.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 108286 031705 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 210.00 270385 3/24/2005 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 1,327.82 108070 8064011 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,490.31 108071 8064010 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,557.80 108072 8064009 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 61.94- 108073 8063678 -CM 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,313.99 270386 3/24/2005 110832 PC2 SOLUTIONS, INC. 1,190.00 TECH SUPPORT 108247 22605003 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,190.00 270387 3/24/2005 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 118.00 108074 72718819 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 62.55 108075 72718820 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 323.65 108129 76554715 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 504.20 270388 312412005 117825 PFEIFFER, LISA 540.00 MODEL 108287 031705 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 540.00 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 3/23/2005 15:33:52 Page - 22 VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT AUTOMOBILES & TRUCKS UTILITY BALANCE SHEET MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 3124/2005 -3/24/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 270389 3/24/2005 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 211,25 107867 2174469 5862.5512 1,094.25 108159 2176983 5862.5513 - 2,473.95 108160 2176984 5862.5513 1,024.05 108161 2176985 5862.5513 26.90- 108162 3314818 5862.5513 100.45- 108163 3314817 5842.5512 202.50 108325 2176982 5862.5512 933.45 108326 2176977 5842.5512 67.45 108327 2176974 5822.5512 539.05 108328 2176976 5822.5513 504.05 108329 2176975 5822.5513 6,922.65 270390 3/24/2005 105875 PICKERMAN'S SOUP AND SANDWICHE 238.83 SONIA'S SNACKS 107976 581 5111.5510 238.83 270391 3/24/2005 111340 POLAR CHEVROLET 14,427.58 SILVERADO PICKUP 108130 52265490 5900.1735 14,427.58 270392 3/24/2005 100961 POSTMASTER 5,045.00 ABOUT TOWN POSTAGE 108248 031805 2210.6123 5,045.00 270393 3/24/2005 101811 PREMIER FLEET SERVICES 1,813.40 PLOW TRUCK REPAIRS 107914 18105 1553.6180 1,813.40 270394 3/24/2005 104424 PRIEDE, SOREN 144.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 108288 031705 5110.6103 144.00 270395 3/24/2005 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 326.20 108076 205071 5822.5513 1,143.26 108077 205074 5842.5513 2,908.57 108078 205068 5862.5513 148.40 108079 203773 5862.5513 17.06- 108080 662432 5842.5513 4,509.37 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 3/23/2005 15:33:52 Page - 22 VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT AUTOMOBILES & TRUCKS UTILITY BALANCE SHEET MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation 270396 312412005 106341 PRIORITY DISPATCH 78.00 RENEWAL 2005 78.00 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3124/2005 -3/24/2005 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 107977 C7742 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 3/23/2005 15:33:52 Page - 23 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 270397 312412005 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 588.06 DOOR MATS 108200 3508 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 466.21 TISSUE, ROLL TOWELS 108201 3506 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,054.27 270398 3/24/2005 101744 QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS 69.73 TEMPERATURE SENSORS 108249 15216 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 69.73 270400 312412005 100971 QUALITY WINE 4.66- 108081 527379 -00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 468.91 108081 527379 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 12.59- 108082 527378 -00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 1,277.57 108082 527378 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 65.76- 108083 527643 -00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 3,311.26 108083 527643 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2.39- 108084 527508 -00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 120.58 108084 527508 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1.47- 108085 527350 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 149.78 108085 527350 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 7.18- 108086 526920 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 727.47 108086 526920 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 13.32- 108087 527631 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 676.67 108087 527631 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 50.48- 108088 527393 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 5,091.84 108088 527393 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 9.00- 108089 525842 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 909.70 108089 525842 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 7.47- 108090 527391 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 760.00 108090 527391 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 200.92- 108091 524732 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 48.92- 108092 523628 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 33.05- 108330 527630 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 1,667.29 108330 527630 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 14,703.86 270401 3124/2005 101965 QWEST CITY OF EDINA 3/23/2005 15:33:52 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 24 3/24/2005 —3/24/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 99.43 952 451 -6058 108131 6058 -3/05 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 99.43 270402 312412005 118002 REA CREATIONS . 235.14 MERCHANDISE 108132 2744 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS -.PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 235.14 270403 3124/2005 102986 RECYCOOL 115.50 RECYCLE ANTIFREEZE 108250 3503161 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 115.50 . 270404 3/24/2005 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 117.00 PLUMBING REPAIRS 108251 38889 5210.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GOLF DOME PROGRAM 117.00 270405 3/24/2005 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 269.27 SOFTENER SALT 108133 00160722 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 269.27 270406 312412005 118009 ROBERT ENGSTROM CO. 75.42 WATER PAYMENT REFUND 108202 031805 5900.1211.1 ACCTS RECEIVABLE MANUAL UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 75.42 270407 3/24/2005 118001 ROZEBOOM MILLER ARCHITECTS INC 25,230.00 ARCHITECT /ENGINEERING SERVICES 108134 1 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 25,230.00 270408 312412005 101963 S & S TREE AND HORTICULTURAL S 2,499.99 CONTRACT TREE PRUNING 107978 50770 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 2,499.99 270409 3/24/2005 100987 SA -AG INC 158.58 FILL SAND 108031 41739 1318.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 166.14 FILL SAND 108032 41740 1318.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 599.62 ICE CONTROL SAND 108033 41815 1318.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 924.34 270410 312412005 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 105.44 PARTS WASHER CHANGE OUT 108252 MB01296429 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 105.44 270411 3124/2005 117807 SAM'S CLUB CITY OF EDINA 3/23/2005 15:33:52 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 25 3/24/2005 -3/24/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No tnv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 93.04 ACCT 7715090304872906 107915 030705 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 93.04 270412 3124/2005 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 14.53 SUPPLIES 108135 031005 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 14.53 270413 3/24/2005 104788 SANDY'S PROMOTIONAL STUFF 175.06 T- SHIRTS 107916 SH5031 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 175.06 270414 3/24/2005 102949 SECURITAS SECURITY SYSTEMS USA 1,115.06 SERVICE CONTRACT 108203 2060498 -IN 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 47.93 BATTERY 108204 2060151 -IN 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 1,162.99 270415 3124/2005 117994 SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES 75.00 BUS RENTAL 107979 031405 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 75.00 270416 312412005 100998 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 165.56 PAINT, TAPE 107917 4623-4 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDINGS 165.56 270417 3124/2005 101585 SHORT, MICHAEL 227.77 EQUIPT REIMBURSEMENT 107980 031505 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 227.77 270418 3/24/2005 102871 SILVERS, ROXANNE 108.00 MODEL 108289 031705 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 108.00 270419 312412005 101275 SJS CORP - CUSTOMIPSC SUPPLY 207.52 DE -ICER 108034 6093 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 207.52 270420 3/2412005 118014 SMITH, GLORIA 552.50 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 108290 031705 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 552.50 270421 3124/2005 106403 SOUND CLIPS INC. 50.00 NEWS FOOTAGE VIDEO 107918 28982 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS CITY OF EDINA 3/23/2005 15:33:52 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 26 3/24/2005 —3/24/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 50.00 270422 3/24/2005 101002 SOUTH SIDE DISTRIBUTORS INC 52.60 108093 161971 5842.5515 COST OF. GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,884.25 108094 161970 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 911,75 108095 161967 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,848.60 270423 3/2412005 118006 SOVIS, MARY JANE 19.00 PROGRAM REFUND 108182 031805 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 19.00 270424 312412005 110977 SOW, ADAMA 908.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 108291 031705 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,010.00 CLEANING 108291 031705 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 1,918.00 270425 3/24/2005 116682 SPECIALTY WINE & BEVERAGES 74.00 108096 2182 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 74.00 270426 3/24/2005 104709 SPORT SUPPLY GROUP INC. 243.87 MEGAPHONE, SWINGS 108205 91646568 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 243.87 270427 3/2412005 103411 SPORTSIGN 360.00 INTERPRETER 108183 05021 4078.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INCLUSION PROGRAM 360.00 270428 3/24/2005 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC 183.82 COUPLINGS 108253 S136409 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 183.82 270429 3/24/2005 100650 STANLEY SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC 90.06 CABLE PADLOCKS 108206 MN- 364714 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 90.06 270430 3/2412005 101009 STATE TREASURER 20.00 GB CERTIFICATION 107919 031405 1495.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS INSPECTIONS 20.00 270431 3124/2005 106452 STONE, HOLLY R55CKREG LOG20000 598.29 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/2412005 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 3/24/2005 -3/24/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 107921 341.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 108292 031705 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 341.00 REPAIRS 107922 CVCB478421 270432 3/2412005 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 102390 STRAND MANUFACTURING CO INC 35.53 CABLE 32.48 CONTRACTED SERVICE 107920 25365 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 32.48 17.60 KEYS CUT 108254 270433 3/24/2005 1553.6530 101015 STREICHERS 3/23/2005 15:33:52 Page - 27 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION WATER TREATMENT 298.09 SQUAD SPOTLIGHTS 107981 1253447 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 300.20 SQUAD REPAIR 108136 1253379 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,657.40 107868 365429 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 68.75 107869 365428 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 598.29 270434 3/2412005 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 400.05 REPAIRS 107921 CTCB478677 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 609.40 REPAIRS 107922 CVCB478421 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 35.53 CABLE 108035 382703CVW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 17.60 KEYS CUT 108254 383658CVW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,062.58 270435 3/24/2005 101019 SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY 1,500.00 MEMBERSHIP 108137 031705 1506.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,500.00 270436 312412005 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. 440.17 TIRES 108138 10034410 1553.6583 TIRES 8 TUBES 440.17 270437 3124/2005 101171 SUPERIOR SHORES CONFERENCE CEN 1,146.43 CONFERENCE CHARGES 108293 031705 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,146.43 270438 3/24/2005 110674 SUPERIOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIO 30.93 PHONE CASE 107923 8887 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 30.93 270439 3/24/2005 101326 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO 190.04 TERMINALS, CLAMPS 108037 18366 -00 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 190.04 270440 312412005 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,657.40 107868 365429 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 68.75 107869 365428 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING RSSCKREG LOG20000 CITY.OF EDINA 3123/2005 15:33:52 Council Check Register Page - 28 3/24/2005 -- 3/24/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 87.50 108331 366136 5862.5515. COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,382.43 108332 366137 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 138.60 108333 365830 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,534.68 270441 3/24/2005 103331 TILSNER, DONNA 5.65 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 108038 031405 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 82.62 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 108038 031405 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 88.27 270442 312412005 101038 TOLL GAS 8 WELDING SUPPLY 23.29 WELDING SUPPLIES 108207 468700 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 23.29 270443 3124/2005 118003 TOMMY BAHAMA _ 260.14 MERCHANDISE 108139 8197951, 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 260.14 270444 3124/2005 117992 TOSHIBA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 117.61 SCANNER ROLLER KIT 107982 ARIN035973 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 105.00 SCANNER MAINTENANCE 107983 SDIN027589 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 222.61 270445 3/24/2005. 101039 TOTAL TOOL 90.22 SPLICE COVERS 108039 7104436 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 90.22 270446 312412005 116438 TWIN CRIES WELLNESS 165.00 AD 108255 PO 9071 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 165.00 270447 3/24/2005 101460 TWIN CITIES WRECKER SALES INC 62.39 STRAP ASSEMBLY 108256 195879 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 62.39 270448 3/2412005 101047 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO 438.67 REPAIRS 107924 233420 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 438.67 270449 3124/2005 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE 101.23 DOOR HARDWARE 108040 104027 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 101.23 R55CKREG LOG20000 520.00 CITY OF EDINA 108258 177613,176801,1 1550.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL Council Check Register 77612 3/24/2005 3/24/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 270450 312412005 105781 UNO DOS TRES COMMUNICATIONS 103981 TWIN CITY OFFICE SUPPLY INC. 384.12 OFFICE SUPPLIES 108257 456161-0 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT, GENERAL 384.12 100.00 270451 3/24/2005 270457 115379 U.S. BANK 103298 UPS STORE #1715, THE 59.62 ACRONIS IMAGE 8.0 107986 MAR42005 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 280 1552.6406 59.62 CENT SVC PW BUILDING 8.72 270452 3124/2005 101051 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 270458 3124/2005 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 564.99 107984 022805 1400.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 29.12 HYDRANT OIL 1,925.37 942983 107984 022805 1419.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 29.12 4,200.79 107984 022805 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 270459 3/24/2005 6,691.15 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 270453 3/24/2005 104223 UNITED PROPERTIES INVESTMENT 1 BAGS, PLATES, TOWELS 107926 572941 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 487,748.59 TIF ASSISTANCE PAY 2004 108184 031705 1000.1303 DUE FROM HRA 487,748.59 270454 3/24/2005 100371 UNITED RENTALS 767.96 SKYJACK RENTAL 108208 46294452 -001 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 767.96 270455 3124/2005 101055 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 3123/2005 15:33:52 Page - 29 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CENT SERV GEN - MIS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL RESERVE PROGRAM POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET EDINBOROUGH PARK 520.00 WORKSHOP REGISTRATION 108258 177613,176801,1 1550.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 77612 520.00 270456 3124/2005 105781 UNO DOS TRES COMMUNICATIONS 100.00 INTERPRETER 107985 2526 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT, GENERAL 100.00 270457 3/24/2005 103298 UPS STORE #1715, THE 8.72 MAIL SERVICE 107925 280 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 8.72 270458 3124/2005 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 29.12 HYDRANT OIL 108041 942983 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 29.12 270459 3/24/2005 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 395.36 BAGS, PLATES, TOWELS 107926 572941 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING SALE OF WATER GENERAL SUPPLIES 3123/2005 15:33:52 Page - 30 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING BUILDING MAINTENANCE 50TH STREET GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING UTILITY REVENUES STREET REVOLVING ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,696.19 CITY OF EDINA PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER R55CKREG LOG20000 270460 3/24/2005 102734 VEIT & COMPANY INC Council Check Register 500.00 HYDRANT RENTAL REFUND 3/24/2005 - 3/24/2005. 031705 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 557.79 BAGS, TOWELS 107927 572892 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 13.25 GLOVES 107928 572893 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 203.42 TISSUE 107929 572471 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 41.25 BAGS, KLEENEX 108259 572942,573217 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 485.12 BAGS, KLEENEX 108259 572942,573217 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES SALE OF WATER GENERAL SUPPLIES 3123/2005 15:33:52 Page - 30 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING BUILDING MAINTENANCE 50TH STREET GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING UTILITY REVENUES STREET REVOLVING ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,696.19 YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER COLLECTION SYSTEMS 270460 3/24/2005 102734 VEIT & COMPANY INC 500.00 HYDRANT RENTAL REFUND 108260 031705 5901.4626 500.00 270461 3/2412005 116104 VERDICON INC. 419.93 DE -ICER 108042 S002502446.001 4090.6406 419.93 270462 3/24/2005 101610 VERIZON DIRECTORIES CORP. 90.75 DIRECTORY AD 107987 FINAL 5110.6122 90.75 270463 3/24/2005 102218 VINTAGE ONE WINES 39.90 .108097 9391 5842.5513 39.90 270464 3124/2005 101953 VISU -SEWER CLEAN & SEAL INC 4,207.74 SANITARY SEWER INSPECTION 107930 17617 -1 5923.6136 4,207.74 270465 3/24/2005 104820 VOELKER, JAMES . 45.88 UNIFORM PURCHASE 108261 031805 1553.6201 45.88 270466 3124/2005 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 120.35 LIGHTING 107931 15009120 -00 5840.6406 138.18 LIGHTING 107931 15009120 -00 1470.6406 302.25 LIGHTING 107931 .15009120 -00 1375.6406 560.78 270467 3/24/2005 103466 WASTE MANAGEMENT - SAVAGE MN 2,952.32 REFUSE 107988 3011783 4095.6103 3,147.23 REFUSE 107989 3012883 4095.6103 37.80 108141 3011789 5821.6182 40.30 108141 3011789 1481.6182 SALE OF WATER GENERAL SUPPLIES 3123/2005 15:33:52 Page - 30 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING BUILDING MAINTENANCE 50TH STREET GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING UTILITY REVENUES STREET REVOLVING ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER COLLECTION SYSTEMS LAUNDRY GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RUBBISH REMOVAL .RUBBISH REMOVAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN LIQUOR YORK GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PARKING RAMP 50TH STREET RUBBISH 50TH STREET RUBBISH 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK FIRE STATION R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor/ Explanation Council Check Register 031805 41.52 3/24/2005 3/24/2005 111602 -00 41.52 Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 70.52 3011789 5210.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 76.62 3011789 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 79.45 3011789 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 82.64 3011789 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 97.52 3011789 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 173.59 3011789 5841.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 179.55 3011789 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 239.29 3011789 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 305.71 3011789 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 305.71 3011789 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 490.51 3011789 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 8,361.80 3011789 270468 3/2412005 108141 101685 WEEKEND FREEDOM 5620.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 574.04 SNOWBLOWER 574.04 270469 3/2412005 115655 WEINAND, JILL 180.00 ADAPTIVE STAFF 180.00 270470 3/24/2005 102342 WENZEL, KENNETH 480.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 480.00 270471 312412005 101078 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT 159.75 BLACK FLEET KEYS 116.09 ROTARY PUMP 275.84 270472 3/24/2005 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 822.35 108209 CITY OF EDINA 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES Council Check Register 031805 1629.6103 3/24/2005 3/24/2005 111602 -00 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 108141 3011789 5210.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 108141 3011789 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 108141 3011789 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 108141 3011789 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 108141 3011789 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 108141 3011789 5841.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 108141 3011789 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 108141 3011789 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 108141 3011789 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 108141 3011789 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 108141 3011789 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 108141 3011789 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 108141 3011789 5620.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 108209 113099 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 108185 031805 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 108294 031705 5110.6103 107932 0027737 -IN 1552.6530 108043 0027753 -IN 1301.6556 108098 111602 -00 5842.5513 108099 111481 -00 5822.5513 108100 111600 -00 5862.5513 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REPAIR PARTS TOOLS 3/2312005 15:33:52 Page - 31 Business Unit GOLF DOME PROGRAM ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL VERNON OCCUPANCY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS YORK OCCUPANCY SENIOR CITIZENS CLUBHOUSE CITY HALL GENERAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK ADAPTIVE RECREATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CENT SVC PW BUILDING GENERAL MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 270473 3/24/2005 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 770.55 108164 119784 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 14.17- 108165 23731 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 8,75- 108166 23711 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA 3123/2005 15:33:52 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 32 3/24/2005 -3/24/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 23.44- 108167 23712 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 12.33- 108168 23746 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 312.41 108334 119782 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,024.27 270474 3/24/2005 100591 WITTSTRUCK, MARTHA 288.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 108295 031705 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 288.00 270475 3124/2005 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 600.00 108101 162303 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,212.50 108169 162373 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 606.25 108170 162372 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 193.00 108335 162427 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,611.75 270476 3/24/2005 101726 XCEL ENERGY 12.99 107933 19258810 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 3,833.64 107934 19570142 1375.6185 LIGHT & POWER PARKING RAMP 3,204.47 107935 19554903 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 2,123.01 108044 19883218 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 591.46 108045 19429213 5821.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 855.71 108045 19429213 5861.6185 LIGHT & POWER VERNON OCCUPANCY 10,621.28 270477 3/24/2005 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 325.55 FEB USAGE 107990 008352890 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL' 113.67 FEB USAGE 107991 008552771 5110.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 439.22 270478 3/24/2005 117995 YANG YANG 32.44 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 108046 031005 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 32.44 270479 312412005 101091 ZIEGLER INC 84.28 TUBE KIT 108142 PC000779615 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 84.28 270480 3/24/2005 101531 ZINN, BOBO 130.00 REIMBURSE 108296 031705 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 468.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 108296 031705 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 598.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/23/2005 15:33:52 Council Check Register Page - 33 3/24/2005 —3124/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation 1,652,942.25 Grand Total PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 1,652,942.25 Total Payments 1,652,942.25 Business Unit R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 3/2412005 - 3/2412005 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 1,025,049.07 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 7,404.54 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 121,936.95 05100 ART CENTER FUND 24,916.74 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 1,193.52 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 199.41 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 31,424.25 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 361.89 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 8,599.29 05800 LIQUOR FUND 114,796.71 05900 UTILITY FUND 316,966.84 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 93.04 Report Totals 1,652,942.25 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing olicies and procedures - t� 0 Finance City Manager 3/23/2005 15:40:19 Page - 1 CITY OF EDINA 3/30/2005 10:51:09 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 1 3/25/2005 - 3/31/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 270481 3125/2005 101976 DRIVER & VEHICLE SERVICES 1,169.05 REGISTRATION /LICENSING 108499 032405 1400.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,169.05 270482 3/3112005 105696 3CMA 350.00 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 108558 2005DUES 2210.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COMMUNICATIONS 350.00 270483 313112005 100612 A.M. LEONARD 344.64 HORTICULTURAL SUPPLIES 108599 020351740101 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 344.64 270484 313112005 100613 AAA 9.50 LICENSE TABS FOR 26.191 108340 032205 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 9.50 270485 3/31/2005 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 42,12 108500 452467 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 34.12 108501 452468 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 57.24 108502 452471 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 133.48 270486 3/31/2005 100616 ACTION MAILING SERVICES INC. 429.62 MAIL PROCESSING 108559 102988 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 429.62 270487 3131/2005 105162 - ADT SECURITY SERVICES 774.81 ALARM SERVICE 108389 91479622 5420.6250 ALARM SERVICE CLUB HOUSE 25.02 ALARM SERVICE 108457 91480016 5111.6250 ALARM SERVICE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 799.83 270488 313112005 118019 ADVANCED LIGHTING 810.00 FLASHLIGHTS 108341 23651 1480.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SPECIAL OPERATIONS 810.00 270489 3/3112005 118049 AIRSHORE INTERNATIONAL 38.82 REPAIR KNOB 108683 AAA12695 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 38.82 270490 3131/2005 101077 AIRTEC INC. 81.78 CLAMPS, WELDING WIRE 108600 295285 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 81.78 CITY OF EDINA 3130/2005 10:51:09 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 2 3/25/2005 - 3/31/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 270491 313112005 100575 ALL SAFE FIRE & SECURITY 176.18 EXTINGUISHER CERTIFICATION 108560 64984 1400.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 34.50 EXTINGUISHER CERTIFICATION 108561 64983 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 438.23 EXTINGUISHER CERTIFICATION 108601 64978 5410.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION 648.91 270492 313112005 112033 ALLDATA 1,500.00 ONLINE DATA SUBSCRIPTION 108342 FW270363 -2005 1553.6160 DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,500.00 270493 313112005 118017 ALLINA MEDICAL CLINIC 270.00 ROOM RENTAL REFUND 108343 032105 1600.4722.03 ARNESON ACRES RENTAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 270.00 270494 313112005 103357 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO 104.37 LAV MIC HEAD 108344 INV59992 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 104.37 270495 313112005 100624 ALTERNATOR REBUILD CO. 153.36 ALTERNATOR 108562 37237 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 153.36 270496 313112005 118021 AMERICAN BEVERAGE LICENSEES 250.00 CONVENTION REGISTRATION 108458 8 5840.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 250.00 270497 3/31/2005 100630 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC. 35.79 COMPUTER PAPER 108684 158085301 5820.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 50TH STREET GENERAL 71.58 COMPUTER PAPER 108684 158085301 5860.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 107.38 COMPUTER PAPER 108684 158085301 5840.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 214.75 270498 313112005 101874 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC. 56.98 RADIO REPAIR 108685 40480 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 88.40 PAGER BATTERIES 108686 40460 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 145.38 270499 313112005 102109 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER 22.81 RADIO REPAIRS 108687 0000063102 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 22.81 CITY OF EDINA 3/30/2005 10:51:09 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 3 3/25/2005 - 3/31/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 270500 3/3112005 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. 260.02 DE, ACID, CHLORINE 108602 26479 5620.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH PARK 260.02 270501 3/31/2005 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 131.95 COFFEE 108688 6013 -458788 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 131.95 270502 3131/2005 101977 ARCH WIRELESS 73.48 PAGER RENTAL 108689 A6339611C 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 73.48 270503 313112005 100634 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. 209.81 BACKRACK 108345 1058421 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 106.50 PRESSURE HOSE 108346 1057601 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 316.31 270504 3/31/2005 118024 BATES, JEREME 20.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 108390 032205 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 20.00 270505 3/31/2005 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 215.60 108424 32723400 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 204.90 108425 32723500 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 105.81 108426 39719100 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 97.11 108427 39719200 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 47.25 108428 32723600 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,061.00 108428 32723600 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,761.80 108429 32723700 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 23.00 108430 39719300 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 106.42 108431 39719400 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 300.00 108503 32758100 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 374.90 108504 32723900 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 500.00 108648 32764000 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,280.80 108649 32723800 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 6,078.59 270506 3/3112005 101191 BENNEROTTE, JENNIFER 99.95 WEBSITE SOFTWARE 108690 10146759 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 99.95 270507 3/31/2005 118016 BERG, SARAH R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/25/2005 - 3131/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 49.82 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 108347 032105 2210.6107 49.82 270508 3131/2005 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 279.10 OFFICE SUPPLIES 108348 3723110 7411.6406 23.91 OFFICE SUPPLIES 108349 3756350 1260.6406 48.82 MARKER BOARD, PENS, GLUE 108563 3761430 1552.6406 44.86 OFFICE SUPPLIES 108564 3742610 1470.6513 124.54 OFFICE SUPPLIES 108565 3732180 1470.6513 23.08- RETURN 108566 CM3732180 1470.6513 75.24- RETURN 108567 CM3723110 7410.6406 422.91 270509 313112005 103832 BLACK & DECKER USPTG 27.41 CLAMPS, WRENCHES 108350 02072220 1553.6530 27.41 270510 3131/2005 100663 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 15.00 PETTY CASH 108604 032405 5410.6406 37.00 PETTY CASH 108604 032405 5410.6235 44.00 PETTY CASH 108604 032405 5401.4603 44.95 PETTY CASH 108604 032405 5410.6105 94.63 PETTY CASH 108604 032405 5210.6513 235.58 270511 313112005 101516 BRAEMAR PRINTING 258.40 RAIN CHECKS 108605 61005 5410.6575 258.40 270512 3131/2005 100667 BROCK WHITE COMPANY 6.16 HAND GRIPS 108351 11324196 -00 1301.6556 6.16 270513 3131/2005 102220 BROWDER STONE COMPANY 98.86 POLICE LANYARDS 108603 25530 1400.6406 98.86 270514 3/3112005 101241 BROWN TRAFFIC PRODUCTS 626.22 TEST EMITTER 108568 170952 1330.6215 626.22 270515 3131/2005 118041 BURLEY, BRYAN 3/30/2005 10:51:09 Page - 4 Subledger Account Description Business Unit MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY ENGINEERING GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PSTF ADMINISTRATION REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION POSTAGE GOLF ADMINISTRATION COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF DOME PROGRAM PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS CITY OF EDINA 3/30/2005 10:51:09 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 5 3/25/2005 - 3/31/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 50.00 ROOM RENTAL REFUND 108606 032205 5401.4553 CLUBHOUSE GOLF REVENUES 50.00 270516 313112005 106487 CALGREN, MARY C. 48.00 CLASS REFUND 108459 032205 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 48.00 270517 3/31/2005 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 241.50 GOLF BALLS 108391 905500167 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 729.81 MERCHANDISE 108392 905449127 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 3,015.41 GOLF BALLS 108393 905375919 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 180.61- 2004 YEAREND REBATE 108723 905099367 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 3,806.11 270518 3/31/2005 108688 CANTON COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2,450.00 ADVERTISING 108394 050201 -1 5210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 6,952.40 ADVERTISING 108395 050301A 5210.6122• ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 9,402.40 270519 313112005 103268 CARLSON, DAVID 308.32 UNIFORM PURCHASE 108460 032305 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 308.32 270520 3131/2005 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 2,021.92 108352 031605 7411.6186 HEAT PSTF OCCUPANCY 65.41 108353 3/16 7411.6186 HEAT PSTF OCCUPANCY 227,12 108396 MAR1605 5430.6186 HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 5,740.93 108569 032105 1551.6186 HEAT CITY HALL GENERAL 9,72 108691 032205 7413.6582 FUEL OIL PSTF FIRE TOWER 8,065.10 270521 3131/2005 101264 CHET'S SHOES INC. 53.25 ZIPPER KITS 108570 BK13558 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS. FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 53.25 270522 3/3112005 118025 CITY OF NORTH ST PAUL 80.00 LABOR RELATIONS CONFERENCE 108397 032305 1120.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION 80.00 270523 3131/2005 100576 CITY OF WHITE BEAR LAKE 100.00 CLASS REGISTRATION 108461 032305 1400.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 100.00 CITY OF EDINA 3/30/2005 10:51:09 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 6 3/25/2005 - 3/31/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 270524 3/31/2005 111676 CLASSIC BRASS QUINTET 150.00 PERFORMANCE 4/10/05 108339 032205 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 270525 3131/2005 117850 COMPLIANCE TRAINING SERVICES 17,569.00 AIR MONITORING SYSTEM 108398 401 1480.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SPECIAL OPERATIONS 17,569.00 270526 313112005 102490 COMPUSA INC. 89.94 COMPUTER ITEMS 108462 401107776 5125.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD MEDIA STUDIO 138.95 COMPUTER ITEMS 108462 401107776 5125.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT MEDIA STUDIO 35.01 COMPUTER ITEMS 108463 401107793 5125.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 119.42 COMPUTER ITEMS 108463 401107793 5125.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT MEDIA STUDIO 383.32 270527 3/3112005 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 33.12 GLOVES, DUCT TAPE 108464 02532522 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 290.66 EARPLUGS, GLOVES 108571 02531934 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 323.78 270528 3131/2005 100706 D.C. ANNIS SEWER INC. 453.00 PUMP SUMP 108692 43320 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 88.00 CLEAN DRAIN 108693 43278 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 541.00 270529 3131/2005 118042 DANIELS, TIFFANY 42.00 PARTY RENTAL REFUND 108607 - 032505 5601.4554 EDINBOROUGH PARK EB /CL REVENUES 42.00 270530 3/31/2005 102285 DAVANNIS 58.52 TRAINING MEALS 108465 152632-0 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 58.52 270531 313112005 101805 DAVID A. KIRSCHT ASSOCIATES IN 700.00 ARCHITECT SERVICES 108399 2304X 5422.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 700.00 270532 3131/2005 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING 362.00 108505 305624 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 567.35 108506 305990 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,426.55 108507 305911 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA 3/30/2005 10:51:09 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 7 3/25/2005 - 3/31/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 33.20 108508 305913 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,389.10 270533 3/31/2005 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 14.61 TOOLS 108354 720895 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 100.62 TOOLS 108355 732473 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 115.23 270534 3131/2005 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 51.12 BAKERY 108608 186562 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 51.12 270535 3/3112005 102712 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION 37.00 WAN USAGE JAN 2005 108400 DV05010285 1400.6204 TELETYPE SERVICE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 31.64 GREENHOUSE 108401 W05020592 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 47.46 ARNESON 108401 W05020592 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 49.17 HISTORICAL 108401 W05020592 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 63.41 108401 W05020592 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 71.47 108401 W05020592 5311.6188 TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION 77.36 108401 W05020592 5210.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF DOME PROGRAM 79.10 CARD ACCESS -PARKS 108401 W05020592 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 79.10 108401 W05020592 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 82.13 108401 W05020592 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 95.53 108401 W05020592 1481.6188 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION 109.65 108401 W05020592 5111.6188 TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 127.09 108401 W05020592 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 174.10 108401 W05020592 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 321.43 108401 W05020592 5610.6188 TELEPHONE ED ADMINISTRATION 372.26 108609 W05020599 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 1,817.90 270536 313112005 100232 DESO 207.68 TABLE 108694 0007548 -IN 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 207.68 270537 3/31/2005 101691 DON BETZEN GOLF SUPPLY CO. 1,329.00 GOLF TEES 108610 18877 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 100.65 MERCHANDISE 108611 18856 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,429.65 270538 3/31/2005 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES 2,742.44 CHEMICALS 108572 82700281 -05 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/30/2005 10:51:09 Council Check Register Page - 8 3/25/2005 — 3/31/2005 Check # Date — Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,742.44 270539 3/31/2005 118023 DRAEGER, NICOLE 16.99 UNIFORM PURCHASE 108402 032205 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 16.99 270540 3/31/2005 100732 DRUMMOND AMERICAN CORP. 146.05 OPEN & SHUT SPRAY 108573 3031513 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 146.05 270541 313112005 100739 EAGLE WINE 1,354.99 108509 208490 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 335.15 108510 208487 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,199.88 108511 208481 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5.53- 108512 662645 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,884.49 270542 3/31/2005 100741 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 2,169.35 108513 325448 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING • 3,622.50 108650 325476 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5,791.85 270543 3/31/2005 118032 ECOWATER SYSTEMS OF HOPKINS 12.00 PERMIT REFUND 108574 ED032179 1495.4112 PLUMBING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 12.00 270544 3/31/2005 100744 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 103.00 EASTER EGG SCRAMBLE REVENUES 108612 032505 5601.4541 GENERAL ADMISSIONS EB /CL REVENUES 103.00 270545 3/31/2005 101630 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS . 144.00 GYM TIME FEE 108466 4461 4077.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 180.00 GYM TIME FEE 108467 4460 4077.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 324.00 270546 3/31/2005 106020 EDINA RESOURCE CENTER 33,372.00 2005 FUNDING 108613 031605 1507.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FAMILINK EDINA 33,372.00 270547 3/31/2005 116448 EGAN OIL COMPANY 14,969.33 GAS 108695 099694 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 14,969.33 CITY OF EDINA arovicvvv w:o i va R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 9 3/25/2005 — 3/31/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Descrlptlon Business Unit 270548 3131/2005 101407 EGAN, MATT 59.98 UNIFORM PURCHASE 108575 032405 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 59.98 270549 313112005 106194 EMA INC. 1,740.00 SCADA LIFT 108356 5604 - 90008160 10028.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN LIFT STATION #5 1,978.17 SCADA DESIGN 108576 560490008201 04284.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN SCADA STORM SEWER 5,275.11 SCADA DESIGN 108576 560490008201 05414.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN SCADA WATERMAIN 5,934.50 SCADA DESIGN 108576 560490008201 03404.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN SCADA SANITARY SEWER 14,927.78 270550 313112005 118022 ENGLER, ERICK 104.00 TRIP REFUND 108403 032105 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS SENIOR CITIZENS 104.00 270551 3131/2005 105339 ENRGI 30.00 WEBSITE TESTING 108468 2574 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 976.25 WEBSITE CONSULTING 108469 2565 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 1,006.25 270552 3/31/2005 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 128.00 108651 288924 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 128.00 270553 3/3112005 105420 FIKES SERVICES 34.08 AIR DEODORIZERS 108577 563598 5841.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS YORK OCCUPANCY 34.08 270554 3/31/2005 114661 FIRESIDE HEARTH & HOME 52.24 PERMIT REFUND 108578 ED031521 1495.4110 HEATING & VENTING LICENSE INSPECTIONS 52.24 270555 3131/2005 108632 GALLES CORPORATION 294.07 CLEANING SUPPLIES 108696 108747 1470.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 294.07 270556 3131/2005 105508 GEMPLER'S INC. 119.35 PRUNER 108614 1006039955 5620.6556 TOOLS EDINBOROUGH PARK 119.35 270557 3131/2005 111343 GLANZER, ROGER R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3125/2005 - 3/31/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 89 39 WIRE CONNECTORS 108697 032505 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TEEN SAFETY CAMP GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 3/30/2005 10:51:09 Page - 10 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION PARK ADMIN. GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE SPECIAL OPERATIONS EDINBOROUGH PARK PSTF OCCUPANCY COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 89.39 YORK SELLING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES 270558 3/31/2005 118046 GOERNE, NANCY 5.00 PROGRAM REFUND 108698 032505 1600.4390.42 5.00 270559 3/3112005 101103 GRAINGER 215.34 BRUSHES, TIE DOWNS 108357 495- 707390 -3 1301.6406 22.68 HACKSAW BLADES 108580 498 - 578317 -6 1480.6710 44.56 CLEVIS, SORBENT, CLEANER 108615 498 - 603799 -4 5620.6406 51.18 HAZ WASTE LABELS 108699 973 - 535175 -2 7411.6406 333.76 270560 3131/2005 102670 GRAND PERE WINES INC 199.00 108514 00015405 5862.5513 199.00 - 270561 3/31/2005 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 377.00 108515 71512 5822.5513 413.00 108652 71546 5842.5513 790.00 270562 3/31/2005 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE 561.93 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 108404 032205 5840.6104 561.93 270563 3131/2005 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 77.70 BULBS 108616 907736248 5630.6406 77.70 270564 3/31/2005 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 1,640.50 108432 207022 5842.5512 207.50- 108433 662382 5842.5513 126.20 108516 208491 5842.5515 1,372.20 108517 208387 5842.5512 6,742.13 108518 208492 5842.5512 1,100.19 108519 . 208488. 5822.5512 99.05 108653 208482 5862.5515 .85 108654 208212 5862.5512 3,376.40 108655 208483 5862.5512 37.95- 108656 662833 5822.5513 TEEN SAFETY CAMP GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 3/30/2005 10:51:09 Page - 10 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION PARK ADMIN. GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE SPECIAL OPERATIONS EDINBOROUGH PARK PSTF OCCUPANCY COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/3012005 10:51:09 Council Check Register Page - 11 3/25/2005 - 3/31/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 14,212.07 270565 3/3112005 106431 HALL, MARY 150.00 PERFORMANCE 4/7/05 108338 032205 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 270566 313112005 100791 HALLMAN OIL COMPANY 431.96 DELO GREASE 108470 148252 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 431.96 270567 313112005 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS 99.90 RIBBON 108471 240537 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 107.90 PAPER 108471 240537 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 207.80 270566 3/3112005 102618 HARDWOOD CREEK LUMBER INC 682.29 HUBS 8 LATHS 108358 5848 1260.6577 LUMBER ENGINEERING GENERAL 682.29 270569 3/31/2005 101215 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFI 999.42 PROCESSING FEES -FEB 2005 108472 505 1195.6170 COURT CHARGES LEGAL SERVICES 999.42 270570 3/31/2005 100805 HIRSHFIELD'S 74.97 PAINT 108617 011762382 5620.6532 PAINT EDINBOROUGH PARK 25.02 PAINT 108618 003969694 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 99.99 270571 313112005 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 248.50 108434 354583 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 958.95 108657 354727 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,207.45 270572 3131/2005 112558 ISAAMAN, TREVOR 378.54 DRILL, DRILL BITS 108405 032105 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 378.54 270573 313112005 103326 J. MARCEL ENTERPRISES 407.42 WHITE POLOS 108473 072220 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 407.42 270574 313112005 101446 JAMIESON AND ASSOCIATES INC. 5912.6406 5620.6201 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5822.5512 5822.5512 5822.5512 5862.5513 5862.5513 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5515 5842.5512 5822.5513 5822.5512 5822.5512 5862.5512 5862.5512 5125.6406 1280.6104 GENERAL SUPPLIES 3130/2005 10:51:09 Page - 12 Business Unit CITY HALL /POLICE BUILDING POOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDINGS LAUNDRY EDINBOROUGH PARK COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS` SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 270576 3/31/2005 100833 JOHN HENRY FOSTER Council Check Register 3/2512005 - 3/3112005 DRAIN FLOATS Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 3,254.70 FINAL A.V. PAYMENT 108700 1 /31 /05STMT 4400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 3,254.70 3131/2005 102059 JOHNS, RICHARD 270575 3/31/2005 100830 JERRY'S PRINTING 15230 POOL SEASON PASSES 108474 32373 5310.6575. PRINTING 5912.6406 5620.6201 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5822.5512 5822.5512 5822.5512 5862.5513 5862.5513 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5515 5842.5512 5822.5513 5822.5512 5822.5512 5862.5512 5862.5512 5125.6406 1280.6104 GENERAL SUPPLIES 3130/2005 10:51:09 Page - 12 Business Unit CITY HALL /POLICE BUILDING POOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDINGS LAUNDRY EDINBOROUGH PARK COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS` SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 152.30 270576 3/31/2005 100833 JOHN HENRY FOSTER MINNESOTA IN 119.28 DRAIN FLOATS 108581 1369658 -01 119.28 270577 3131/2005 102059 JOHNS, RICHARD 92.94 UNIFORM PURCHASE 108619 032505 92.94 270578 3/31/2005 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 3,874.73 108435 1870611 110.40 108436 1870614 1,727.35 108437 1870615 13.92- 108438 276459 9.08- 108439 276457 1.78- 108440 276456 39.95- 108520. 276455 27.90- 108521 276759 1,775.77 108658 1874167 8,216.28 108659 1874168 65.40 108660 1874170 365.55 108661 1874165 416.85 108662 1874161 470.19 108663 1874163 346.23 108664 1874164 7.39- 108665 276458 84.09- 108666 276454 17,184.64 270579 3/31/2005 102719 JOHNSON, PHILLIP 87.31 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 108475 032205 87.31 270580 3/31/2005 103201 JOHNSON, STEVE 414.19 EQ SHOW EXPENSES. 108476 031805 414.19 5912.6406 5620.6201 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5822.5512 5822.5512 5822.5512 5862.5513 5862.5513 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5515 5842.5512 5822.5513 5822.5512 5822.5512 5862.5512 5862.5512 5125.6406 1280.6104 GENERAL SUPPLIES 3130/2005 10:51:09 Page - 12 Business Unit CITY HALL /POLICE BUILDING POOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDINGS LAUNDRY EDINBOROUGH PARK COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS` SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD R55CKREG LOG20000 94.00 GOLF CLUB CITY OF EDINA 030912 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES Council Check Register GOLF CLUBS 108407 030823 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 3/25/2005 - 3/31/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 270581 313112005 100839 KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES 341.81 BUSHINGS, SHEAVES 108582 L871688 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 108620 2281860 341.81 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 270582 313112005 111018 KEEPRS INC. 270585 3/3112005 179.90 UNIFORM PANTS 108583 32111 -02 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS 179.90 1,919.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 270583 3131/2005 5110.6103 108857 KEN GORG GOLF SHOP ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 3/30/2005 10:51:09 Page - 13 Business Unit COLLECTION SYSTEMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 94.00 GOLF CLUB 108406 030912 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 190.00 GOLF CLUBS 108407 030823 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 284.00 270584 313112005 116295 KING PAR CORPORATION 557.08 MERCHANDISE 108620 2281860 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 557.08 270585 3/3112005 101185 KNUTSON, KAREN 1,919.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 108701 032505 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,919.00 270586 313112005 100846 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO 2,537.05 108441 430385 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 448.00 108442 430356 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 16.00 108667 430922 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 817.30 108668 430924 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 36.00 108669 430923 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 3,854.35 270587 313112005 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 434.71 LOCKNUTS, HOLESAWS 108584 3008878 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 434.71 270588 313112005 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 20.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 108477 1 -000020641 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 20.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 108478 1 -000020639 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 40.00 270589 3/3112005 118027 LENCO INDUSTRIES 160,691.00 BEARCAT RESPONSE VEHICLE 108479 7685 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 180,691.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation 270590 3/3112005 100858 LOGIS 31.00 1,178.00 2,242.00 2,355.00 2,484.00 3,956.00 270591 3/3112005 5842.5514 116618 LUTERBACH, TERESA Council Check Register 776334 5.00 PROGRAM REFUND - 3/31/2005 774511 5.00 Inv No 270592 313112005 108480 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 597.01 25037 2210.6160 DATA PROCESSING 609.02 25037 1120.6160 DATA PROCESSING 1,206.03 25037 270593 3/31/2005 108480 100864 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING 274.00 TUBE ASSEMBLIES, SCRAPER 5910.6160 DATA PROCESSING 274.00- CREDIT - 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING 659.49 HYDRO FLUID, FILTER 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING 659.49 032505 270594 3/3112005 108443 100868 MARK VII SALES 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 1,054.11 176608 - 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 1,774.05 592.40 123.45 1,250.85 2,549.30 108703 2052111 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 108704 5767 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 108705 2052263 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS 108444 CITY OF EDINA 5842.5514 Council Check Register 776334 5862.5514 3125/2005 - 3/31/2005 774511 PO # Doc,No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 108480 25037 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 108480 25037 2210.6160 DATA PROCESSING 108480 25037 1120.6160 DATA PROCESSING 108480 25037 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING 108480 25037 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING 108480 25037 5910.6160 DATA PROCESSING 108480 25037 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING 108460 25037 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING 108702 032505 1600.4390.42 TEEN SAFETY CAMP 108443 176417 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 108522 176608 - 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 108703 2052111 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 108704 5767 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 108705 2052263 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS 108444 776319 5842.5514 108523 776334 5862.5514 108524 774511 5862.5514 108525 776335 5862.5515 108526 777303 5862.5514 108527 776903 5842.5514 108528 776904 5842.5515 108670 778257 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 3/30/2005 10:51:09 Page - 14 Business Unit CENT SERV GEN - MIS COMMUNICATIONS ADMINISTRATION INSPECTIONS CENT SERV GEN - MIS GENERAL (BILLING) ASSESSING FINANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 270595 3/31/2005 101030 MATHISON CO. 43.08 TRANSFER GRAPHITE 108481 595202 -0 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 43.08 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/25/2005 — 3/31/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 270596 313112005 102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC 62.50 ENGINEERING CHARGES 108706 23633 1550.6188 TELEPHONE 62.50 270597 3131/2005 100870 MATRX 122.00 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 108585 685313 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 122.00 270598 3/31/2005 100875 MCCAREN DESIGNS INC. 1,115.91 PLANTS 108621 30513 5620.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS 1,115.91 270599 3131/2005 118030 MCGRAW -HILL COMPANIES 319.43 REFERENCE BOOKS 108482 13124606001 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 319.43 270600 313112005 102097 MCMASTER -CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 127.63 PLIERS, DRILL BITS 108586 19658610 1343.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 127.63 270601 3/3112005 103189 MEDICA 77,938.45 HIGH OPTION 108359 105091102386 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION 77,938.45 270602 3/31/2005 103189 MEDICA 1,675.18 LOW OPTION 108360 105091122552 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION 1,675.18 270603 3/31/2005 103189 MEDICA 5,069.08 SELECT OPTION 108361 105091134271 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION 5,069.08 270604 3/3112005 103189 MEDICA 57,752.09 ELECT OPTION 108362 105091125472 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION 57,752.09 270605 3/3112005 101483 MENARDS 11.27 CEDAR, VINYL 108408 9138 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 94.61 CHAIR 108409 8711 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 105.88 270606 3/31/2005 101987 MENARDS 3130/2005 10:51:09 Page - 15 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EDINBOROUGH PARK ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP BRIDGES GUARD RAILS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CLUB HOUSE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 100882 MERIT SUPPLY Council Check Register 52.19 RED PADS 108363 3125/2005 - 313112005 5840.6406 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 34.01 DUCT TAPE, LOCKS 108622 74342 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 267.35 PAINT & BRUSHES 108623 73767 5630.6532 PAINT 55.24 CHAIN, DRILL BITS, BULBS 108624 71898 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 26.44 FILTER, TOOL, SPONGES 108625 70115 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 270607 313112005 270608 3131/2005 270609 3/3112005 270610 3/3112005 270611 313112005 270612 3/3112005 270613 3/3112005 I 383.04 100882 MERIT SUPPLY 52.19 RED PADS 108363 66497 5840.6406 3,977.88 MICROMAX AUTOSCRUBBER 108364 66496 5841.6406 1,015.90 LINERS, WYPALL 108365 66532 5511.6511 124.18 GRILL CLEANER, BAGS 108410 66516 5421.6511 164.86 TISSUE, CUPS, LINERS 108587 66558 1552.6511 5,335.01 100410 METROCALL 366.20 PAGERS 108483 02149654 -1 1400.6151 366.20 104650 MICRO CENTER 10.64 TECH SUPPLIES 108366 838045 1120.6406 95.84 TECH SUPPLIES 108366 838045 1554.6406 7.44 TECH SUPPLIES 108367 854579 1554.6406 42.59 TECH SUPPLIES 108367 854579 1260.6710 156.51 100692 MIDWEST COCA -COLA EAGAN 149.90 108445 82591138 5822.5515 292.20 108446 83629136 5842.5515 400.20 108447 82591203 5862.5515 842.30 102386 MINNEAPOLIS POLICE CONCERT BAN 100.00 PERFORMANCE 4/3/05 108336 032205 5610.6136 100.00 101410 MINNESOTA STATE BOARD OF ELECT 30.00 LICENSE RENEWAL 108626 PL04137 -2005 1281.6104 30.00 118033 MINNESOTA STATE FIRE RESCUE SC 105.00 FF II REVIEW & TEST 108588 031405 1470.6104 105.00 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT RENTAL GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 3/30/2005 10:51:09 Page - 16 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH PARK CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTENNIAL LAKES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL YORK OCCUPANCY ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GRILL CENT SVC PW BUILDING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ADMINISTRATION CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS ENGINEERING GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation 270614 3131/2005 5630.6180 105921 MSTMA 108628 451331 -00 65.00 MEMBERSHIP FEES 108629 451338 -00 65.00 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 270615 3/3112005 5630.6180 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 1554.6230 37.24 BEARING, OIL FILTERS 148.60 REEL SHARPENING 270618 313112005 152.98 REEL SHARPENING 600.88 REEL SHARPENING 7,299.42 120.06- CREDIT 11223157 1318.6525 819.64 270616 313112005 108590 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 1318.6406 69.00 7,354.11 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/25/2005 - 3/31/2005 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 108368 032205 1640.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 108589 452428 -00 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 108627 451335 -00 5630.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 108628 451331 -00 5630.6160 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 108629 451338 -00 5630.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 108630 451942 -00 5630.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 108529 30503 5822.5513 108530 30502 5862.5513 108671 30504 5842.5513 270617 3/3112005 104672 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 17.65 108631 679000121028 1120.6188 66.40 108631 679000121028 1554.6230 84.05 270618 313112005 117102 NORTH AMERICAN SALT CO. 7,299.42 ICE CONTROL SALT 108369 11223157 1318.6525 54.69 FUEL SURCHARGE 108590 11221796 1318.6406 7,354.11 270619 3/3112005 105672 NORTHERN POWER PRODUCTS INC. 15.46 SPARK PLUGS 108370 149743 1553.6530 15.46 270620 313112005 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY 306.37 D'ARCHES, CHARCOAL 108484 31161100 5120.5510 78.24 TAPE 108485 31186900 5120.5510 384.61 270621 313112005 100930 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO. 140.79 TIRE SERVICE 108579 NW -94809 1553.6583 140.79 3/30/2005 10:51:09 Page - 17 Business Unit PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTENNIAL LAKES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN • � , 7 CITY OF EDINA 3/30/2005 10:51:09 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 18 3/25/2005 - 3/31/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 270622 313112005 113442 O'CONNELL, RAYMOND 64.70 BRICK FOR NEW SIGN 108411 032105 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 64.70 270623 3131/2005 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 520.85 CHAIN SLING, HOOK 108371 327862 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 520.85 270624 3131/2005 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 825.70 108531 8064683 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,586.80 108532 8064682 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 144.53 108533 8063328 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 358.80- 108534 8064329 -CM 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6,926.80 108672 8064684 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 11,125.03 270625 313112005 110832 PC2 SOLUTIONS, INC. 586.90 TECH SUPPORT 108412 21205009 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 525.00 TECH SUPPORT 108413 31205007 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 595.00 TECH SUPPORT 108413 31205007 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,706.90 270626 3/3112005 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 333.90 108414 76554732 5210.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GOLF DOME PROGRAM 333.90 270627 3/3112005 100946 PERA 78,224.92 PPEND 3/22105 108707 032505 1000.2023 P.E.R.A. PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 78,224.92 270628 313112005 100950 PETTY CASH 1.24 108423 032205 2210.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 1.98 108423 032205 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 5.00 108423 032205 1140.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLANNING 6.36 108423 032205 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING 7.35 108423 032205 5910.6235 POSTAGE GENERAL (BILLING) 9.00 108423 032205 1281.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TRAINING 10.00 108423 032205 1600.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 10.00 108423 032205 1001.8060 CASH OVER AND UNDER GENERAL FUND REVENUES 11.50 108423 032205 1190.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ASSESSING 13.00 108423 032205 2210.6106 MEETING EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 13.00 108423 032205 5840.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL • � , 7 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3125/2005 - 3/31/2005 3/30/2005 10:51:09 Page - 19 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Descriptlon Business Unit 13.15 108423 032205 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 14.86 108423 032205 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 15.92 108423 032205 1504.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION 16.00 108423 032205 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 17.00 108423 032205 1490.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PUBLIC HEALTH 20.00 108423 032205 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION 20.00 108423 032205 2210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER COMMUNICATIONS 20.23 108423 032205 5952.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RECYCLING 21.00 108423 032205 1490.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PUBLIC HEALTH 21.18 108423 032205 5913.6106 MEETING EXPENSE DISTRIBUTION 22.88 108423 032205 1260.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL 26.09 108423 032205 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 29.50 108423 032205 1640.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 30.00 108423 032205 1554.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CENT SERV GEN - MIS 30.41 108423 032205 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 36.00 108423 032205 5860.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 41.35 108423 032205 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 53.04 108423 032205 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 55.18 108423 032205 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING 56.80 108423 032205 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 63.93 108423 032205 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 100.00 108423 032205 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 812.95 270629 3/31/2005 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 2,228,39 108448 2176978 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 61.45 108449 2176979 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,680.36 108450 2176980 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 142.45- 108451 3314983 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,522.78 108673 2179509 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,749.01 108674 2179511 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 258.10 108675 2179506 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 697.90 108676 2179507 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 90.60 108677 2179508 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 13,166.14 270630 3131/2005 100119 PING 665.93 IRONS SET 108415 7239086 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,247.65 GOLF BAGS, HEADWEAR 108632 7244002 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 2,113.74 IRONS, PUTTERS 108633 7243973 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 202.10 GOLF BAGS 108634 7243993 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 4,229.42 CITY OF EDINA 3/30/2005 10:51:09 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 20 3/2512005 - 3/31/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 270631 . 3/31/2005 102156 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 181.75 108452 50961 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 181.75 270632 313112005 116336 PLYMOUTH PLUMBING 27.28 PERMIT REFUND 108592 ED028329 1495.4112 PLUMBING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 27.28 270633 313112005 100961 POSTMASTER 185.00 POSTAGE 108708 032505 5110.6235 POSTAGE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 185.00 270634 3/31/2005 106152 POWERPLAN - 25.92 SWITCH 108591 164849 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 25.92 270635 3/31/2005 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC 153.00 BLADE SHARPENING 108372 209843 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 153.00 270636 313112005 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 85.65 108453 206441 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,229.69 108535. 208485 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 77,25 108536 208486 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 336.02 108537 208489 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,728.61 270637 3/31/2005 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 461.05 PURELL, TISSUE, LINERS 108635 3514 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 262.60 ROLL TOWELS, CLEANERS 108636 3519, 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 723.65 270638 3/31/2005 116481 PUTTING GREENS OF MINNESOTA 319.50 SAMPLE MAT 108416 103 5210.6590 RANGE BALLS GOLF DOME PROGRAM 319.50 270639 3/31/2005 102964 QUALIFICATION TARGETS 58.58 TRAINING TARGETS 108486 20500630 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 58.58 270640 3/31/2005 100971 QUALITY WINE N CITY OF EDINA 3/30/2005 10:51:09 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 21 3/25/2005 - 3/31/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 6.63- 108538 530249 -00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 671.61 108538 530249 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 19.20- 108539 530270 -00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 1,954.21 108539 530270 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 63.01- 108540 530424 -00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 3,174.05 108540 530424 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,0¢ 108541 530310 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 104.92 108541 530310 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 12.30- 108542 530354 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 618.62 108542 530354 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 16.25- 108543 530250 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 1,640.51 108543 530250 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3.00- 108544 530248 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 303.70 108544 530248 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 13.13- 108545 530271 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 1,329.72 108545 530271 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 40.19- 108546 530251 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 4,058.41 108546 530251 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 30.66- 108678 530418 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 1,548.68 108678 530418 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 15,199.02 270641 313112005 101965 QWEST 111.73 952 920 -8166 108709 8166 -3/05 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 111.73 270642 313112005 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 457.00 PLUMBING REPAIRS 108637 38901 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 457.00 270643 3/31/2005 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 52.72 SOFTENER SALT 108710 00160831 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 52.72 270644 313112005 104788 SANDY'S PROMOTIONAL STUFF 708.82 PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS 108593 SH5027 2210.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 216.33 EASTER SCRAMBLE EGGS 108594 SH5039 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 925.15 270645 313112005 118035 SATTERTHWAITE, ANN 21.00 DUPLICATE PMT REFUND 108638 032405 1400.4120 DOG LICENSES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 21.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/25/2005 — 3/31/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 270646 313112005 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 21.30 LUMBER 108373 40055397 1646.6577 LUMBER 56.80 LUMBER 108374 40054663 1646.6577 LUMBER 232.82 LUMBER, NAILS 108375 40052084 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 310.92 270647 3/31/2005 100998 .SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 136.00 PAINT 108595 7445 -3 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 136.00 270648 3131/2005 105712 SICO AMERICA INC. 1,274.83 DANCE FLOOR EDGING 108639 1384938 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,274.83 270649 3131/2005 100999 SIGNAL SYSTEMS INC. 95.00 RIBBON, SET DLS DATES 108376 75681 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 95.00 270650 3/31/2005 101000 SIR SPEEDY 325.19 BUSINESS CARD SHELLS 108640 46731 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 325.19 270651 3/31/2005 118034 SLB OF MINNESOTA LLC 387.22 SPECIAL MEETINGS 108641 34610EDINA 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE 387.22 270652 3131/2005 101002 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS INC 666.25 108547 162326 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 13.85 108548 162327 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 3,064.05 108549 162331 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 38.75 108550 162332 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 3,782.90 270653 3/3112005 116682 SPECIALTY WINE & BEVERAGES 3/30/2005 10:51:09 Page - 1 22 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE SNOW & ICE REMOVAL STREET REVOLVING EDINBOROUGH PARK ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CITY COUNCIL 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 89.00 . 108679 2185 ,. 5862.5512 1 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 270654 3131/2005 101462 SPORT HALEY INC. 1,440.08. MERCHANDISE 1,440.08 108642 PSI -040907 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CITY OF EDINA 3/30/2005 10:51:09 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 23 3/25/2005 - 3/31/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 270655 3/3112005 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC 138.97 SUPPORT 108377 SI36421 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 138.97 270656 3/3112005 100650 STANLEY SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC 36.44 KEY BLANKS KEYED 108378 MN- 364505 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 36.44 270657 3/3112005 116631 STELLAR ENERGY SERVICES INC. 409.02 GENERATOR REPAIR 108711 1312 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 409.02 270658 3/3112005 101015 STREICHERS 31.90 TRAINING AMMO 108487 1255066 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 87.20 HEADLIGHT REPAIR 108712 1255257 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 119.10 270659 3/3112005 104349 STRUCTURED NETWORK SOLUTIONS 102.08 SERVER INSTALLATION 108643 11791 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 102.08 270660 313112005 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 98.67 MAT PACKAGE 108379 383755CVW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 98.67 270661 3/3112005 102140 SUN MOUNTAIN SPORTS INC. 3,256.82 MERCHANDISE 108417 545732 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 257.50 GOLF BAGS 108644 546731 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 3,514.32 270662 313112005 110674 SUPERIOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIO 26.50 PHONE CASE 108380 9243 1322.6188 TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 26.50 270663 313112005 104412 TANDY BRANDS ACCESSORIES 868.74 MERCHANDISE 108645 2458125 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 868.74 270664 3131/2005 101027 TARGET 52.59 BINDERS 108646 0766412 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 52.59 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP FIRST AID SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 3/30/2005 10:51:09 Page - 24 Business Unit PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL MEETING EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY COUNCIL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS MAGAZINEINEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 312512005 — 3/31/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 270665 3/3112005 101474 TITLEIST 2,676.78 GOLF BALLS 108488 1934067 5440.5511 253.80 GOLF BALLS 108489 1951579 5440.5511 1,697.54- CREDIT ON ACCT 108490 CREDIT 5440.5511 1,233.04 270666 313112005 116302 TRI - ANIM HEALTH SERVICES INC 1,030.00 NEBULIZERS 108713 MMH50687259 1470.6510 1,030.00 270667 313112005 103981 TWIN CITY OFFICE SUPPLY INC. 92.48 PRINTER DRUM 108491 457325-0 5110.6513 92.48 270668 313112005 118031 TWIN CITY SCALE COMPANY INC. 100.00 REPAIR 108492 00045742 1400.6215 100.00 270669 313112005 118020 TWIN WEST CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 25.00 LEGISLATIVE BREAKFAST 108381 46810 1100.6106 25.00 270670 3131/2005 102104 UNDIS, PAT 1,919.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 108714 032505 5110.6103 1,919.00 270671 313112005 102026 UNISOURCE 948.86 P &R INSIDER PAPER 108382 59363229900 2210.6123 1,787.34 ABOUT TOWN PAPER 108715 59307452500 2210.6123 6,019.94 ABOUT TOWN PAPER 108716 59307453000 2210.6123 8,756.14 270672 313112005 101053 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY 49.25 LIGHTING 108596 928004 1552.6530 860.86 GENERATOR PLUGS 108717 924905 5913.6406 910.11 270673 3/3112005 101073 UNITED RENTALS 116.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL SEMINAR 108383 46772443 -001 1281.6104 116.00 270674 313112005 102090 URBAN LAND INSTITUTE Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP FIRST AID SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 3/30/2005 10:51:09 Page - 24 Business Unit PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL MEETING EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY COUNCIL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS MAGAZINEINEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING ,to R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation Council Check Register 190.00 DUES RENEWAL 3/25/2005 190.00 270675 3/3112005 Inv No 100050 LISPS Subledger Account Description Business Unit 4,000.00 ACCT #75983 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 4,000.00 108647 270676 3/3112005 POSTAGE 118029 VALESANO, SARAH 108493 032205 42.00 CLASS REFUND ART CENTER REVENUES 108494 42.00 5111.6406 270677 313112005 108718 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 125.94 TOWELS, TISSUE, CUPS 3595708789 5420.6188 218.86 GUN CLEANING SUPPLIES 108419 3595708789 344.80 TELEPHONE 270676 3131/2005 3595708789 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH .55 3595708769 1190.6188 TELEPHONE 8.09 108419 3595708789 1495.6188 8.09 INSPECTIONS 108419 3595708789 8.53 TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS 108419 27.66 1120.6188 TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION 33.08 3595708789 1600.6188 TELEPHONE 58.41 108419 3595708789 1640.6188 69.94 PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 108419 3595708789 89.15 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 108495 141.61 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 517.49 190035- 2005 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 962.60 108385 270679 3/31/2005 GENERAL SUPPLIES 102571 VGM GOLF 108386 15009593 -00 160.00 DUES 50TH STREET GENERAL 108386 160.00 5111.6406 270680 313112005 108420 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 61.86 LIGHTING 144.41 LIGHTING 289.63 LIGHTING 495.90 270681 3/31/2005 105440 WEIGLE, SUE 7.03 PETTY CASH CITY OF EDINA 3/30/2005 10:51:09 Council Check Register Page - 25 3/25/2005 - 3/31/2005 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 108384 17873 -2005 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 108647 032405 1550.6235 POSTAGE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 108493 032205 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 108494 573439 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 108718 574432 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 108419 3595708789 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 108419 3595708789 1140.6188 TELEPHONE PLANNING 108419 3595708789 1490.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH 108419 3595708769 1190.6188 TELEPHONE ASSESSING 108419 3595708789 1495.6188 TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS 108419 3595708789 2210.6188 TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS 108419 3595708789 1120.6188 TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION 108419 3595708789 1600.6188 TELEPHONE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 108419 3595708789 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 108419 3595708789 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 108495 3595711857 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 108418 190035- 2005 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 108385 15009721 -00 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 108386 15009593 -00 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH STREET GENERAL 108386 15009593 -00 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 108420 032105 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS CITY OF EDINA 3/30/2005 10:51:09 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 26 3/25/2005 - 3131/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 72.19 PETTY CASH 108420 032105 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 96.00 PETTY CASH 108420 032105 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 175.22 270682 3131/2005 118018 WESTSIDE TROMBONE QUARTET 150.00 PERFORMANCE 4/5/05 108337 032205 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 270683 3/31/2005 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 554.40 108551 112000 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 682.40 108552 112091 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 228.80 108553 111998 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 6.67- 108554 111950 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 26.68- 108555 111420 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,432.25 270684 3/3112005 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 200.00 108454 119829 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 409.82 108455 119783 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 594.23 108456 119921 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,383.43 108556 119922 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 609.97 108680 120388 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,197.45 270685 3131/2005 112954 WISCONSIN TURF EQUIPMENT CORP. 20.75 PARTS BOOK 108597 511635 -000 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 20.75 270686 3131/2005 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 269.00 108557 162612 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,195.25 108681 162683 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 264.00 108682 162535 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,728.25 270687 313112005 101726 XCEL ENERGY 1,589.06 108387 20417372 5630.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENTENNIAL LAKES 2,806.44 108388 20597443 5420.6185 LIGHT & POWER CLUB HOUSE 4.65 108421 20606952 5861.6185 LIGHT & POWER VERNON OCCUPANCY 1,249.40 108421 20606952 5841.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK OCCUPANCY 27.77 108422 20720181 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 2,343.70 108496 20874371 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 127.86 108497 20903355 4086.6185 LIGHT & POWER AQUATIC WEEDS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/25/2005 — 3/31/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 1,493.78 108719 20878112 7411.6185 6,749.94 108720 21421453 5620.6185 16, 392.60 270688 313112005 115344 XEROX OMNIFAX 355.95 2ND FL FAX SERVICE 108598 11210441 1550.6230 215.28 FAX DRUM 108721 11209021 1550.6406 571.23 270689 313112005 103584 XPEDX Subledger Account Description LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER 3/30/2005 10:51:09 Page - 27 Business Unit PSTF OCCUPANCY EDINBOROUGH PARK SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT . CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,173.65 LETTERHEAD PAPER 108722 N342371211 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,173.65 270690 3/31/2005 118028 YAHOOI CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS 20.37 COST OF ADMIN SUBPOENA 108498 35430 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20.37 757,361.78 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 757,361.78 Total Payments 757,361.78 CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/30/2005 10:57:27 Councll Check Summary Page - 1 3125/2005 - 3/31/2005 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 525,649.19 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 12,538.98 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 3,842.56 05100 ART CENTER FUND 5,973.47 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 10,227.79 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 223.77 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 24,093.23 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 3,660.04 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 14,731.22 05800 LIQUOR FUND 128,062.03 05900 UTILITY FUND 22,164.42 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 1,978.17 05950 RECYCLING FUND 20.23 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 4,196.68 Report Totals 757,361.78 R -1 We confirm to the best of our bwwledge and belief, that these claims comply in all materiel respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing nollcMe and procedures Finance City Manager 4 OORSEY DOPSEY & WHITNEY LLP AGENDA ITEM NO. V. B. MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Gordon Hughes, City Manager FROM: Jerome P. Gilligan DATE: March 31, 2005 RE: Proposed Issuance of Revenue Bonds by the City of Minneapolis for Fairview Hospital and Healthcare Services At its meeting on April 5th the City Council will hold a public hearing on a proposal from Fairview Health Services ( "Fairview ") that the City consent to the issuance by the City of Minneapolis of tax - exempt revenue bonds under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.152 to 469.165, to finance a remodeling project at Fairview Southdale Hospital and to refund bonds previously issued by the Minnesota Agricultural and Economic Development Board in 1997 and 2000, a portion of proceeds of which financed improvements at Fairview Southdale. The City has previously consented to Minneapolis issuing revenue bonds under this authority on behalf of Fairview to finance improvements to the Hospital. The City has also previously approved other cities issuing revenue bonds to finance facilities of other non - profit corporations in the City. Federal law for tax - exempt bonds requires that the City hold a public hearing on the proposed financing and refunding prior to giving such approval. The bonds would be issued as part of a larger issue by Minneapolis to finance projects at other Fairview hospitals in Burnsville, Princeton and Wyoming, Minnesota and refund the 1997 and 2000 bonds of the Minnesota Agricultural and Economic Board. The 1997 and 2000 bonds financed improvements at other Fairview hospitals in addition to Fairview Southdale Hospital. Approximately $35,000,000 of the principal amount of the bonds would be used to finance the proposed remodeling to be undertaken at Fairview Southdale Hospital. The debt service on the bonds will be payable solely from payments to be made by Fairview, and the City will not have any liability with respect to the bonds and will not be required to enter into any agreements with respect to the bonds. Fairview will pay all City expenses with respect to the bonds. A representative from Fairview will be in attendance at the April 5th meeting to respond to any questions. Following the public hearing the City Council wishes to approve the issuance of the bonds by the City of Minneapolis it should adopt a resolution approving the issuance of the bonds by the City of Minneapolis. DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP RESOLUTON NO. 2005-24 APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS BY THE CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS ON BEHALF OF FAIRVIEW HEALTH SERVICES UNDER THE MINNESOTA STATUTES, SECTIONS 469.152 TO 469.165 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City of Edina "), as follows: SECTION 1 Recitals and Findings 1.1. This Council has received a proposal from Fairview Health Services, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation ( "Fairview "), that the City of Edina authorize the City of Minneapolis, Minnesota (the "City of Minneapolis ") to issue bonds under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 through 469.165 (the "Act ") to finance the remodeling of portions of Fairview Southdale Hospital in the City, and the acquisition and installation of items of equipment therein (the "Project "), and to refund the Health Care System Revenue Bonds, Series 1997 (Fairview Hospital and Healthcare Services) and the Health Care System Revenue Bonds, Series 2000A . (Fairview Health Services) of the Minnesota Agricultural and Economic Development Board (the "Refunding "), a portion of the proceeds of which were used finance improvements to Fairview Southdale Hospital and the acquisition and installation of items of equipment therein . 1.2. At a public hearing held on April 5, 2005, all parties who appeared at the hearing were given an opportunity to express their views with respect to the proposal to finance the Project and provide, for the Refunding through the issuance of revenue bonds under the Act by the City of Minneapolis and interested persons•were given the opportunity to submit written comments to the City Clerk before the time of the hearing. SECTION 2 Approvals 2.1. The issuance of bonds by the City of Minneapolis, pursuant to the Act to finance the Project and provide fro the Refunding, is hereby consented to and approved. The terms of the bonds shall be as are approved by the Minneapolis City Council. 2.2. The Mayor and City Manager and other officers of the City of Edina are authorized and directed to furnish to Fairview, the City of Minneapolis and the attorneys .rendering an opinion on the issuance of the bonds, certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City of Edina relating to the bonds and such other affidavits and certificates as may be required to show the facts relating to the legality and marketability of the bonds as such facts appear from the books and records in the officer's custody and control or as otherwise known to them; and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall constitute representations of the City of Edina as to the truth of all statements contained therein. Resolution No. 2005 -24 Page Two Adopted this 5th day of April, 2005 Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of March 1, 2005, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this day of 2005. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 23,2005,7:00 PM EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 4801 WEST 50TH STREET MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair David Byron, Michael Schroeder, Michael Fischer, John Lonsbury, Helen McClelland, Stephen Brown, Floyd Grabiel MEMBERS ABSENT: David Runyan and Goof Workinger STAFF PRESENT: Kris Aaker and Jackie Hoogenakker I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: The minutes of the January 26, 2005, meeting were filed as submitted. II. NEW BUSINESS: A-05 -1 Amendment to Zoning Ordinance & C-05 -1 Conditional Use Permit Haugland Companies 3901 -3907 50th Street West 5000 -5020 France Avenue South Ms. Aaker informed the Commission the City is requesting an amendment to the zoning ordinance and Haugland Companies is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to allow redevelopment on the corner of West 50th Street and France Avenue. Ms. Aaker said the proposal includes a mix of residential and retail and would be developed in phases. The proposed residential uses would need to comply with the standards for the district, but would be exempt from the floor area limit. The residential use would also need to provide private parking to support the project. Mr. Aaker concluded staff recommends preliminary approval of an amendment to the zoning ordinance and preliminary approval of a Conditional Use Permit for the proposed project subject to the satisfaction of the following conditions: final adoption of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment, approval of Conditional Use Permit for dwelling units, easements as required for building and public utilities and Watershed District Permits. Mr. Gene Haugland, applicant and Mr. J. Benshoof and Mr. Dan Young - Dixon were present to respond to questions. Commissioner Fischer commented in reviewing the plans it appears "air rights" will need to be readdressed. Ms. Aaker responded that is correct. She stated "air and subterranean rights" need to be addressed, and resolved. Chair Byron referred to a letter from Mr. Richard Curtin (owner of the adjacent Ampersand building) and asked Ms. Aaker if the proponent had the opportunity to review Mr. Curtin's letter. Ms. Aaker responded Mr. Haugland was provided with a copy of the letter and if she understood correctly Mr. Haugland personally met with Mr. Curtin. Mr. Haugland addressed the Commission and informed them he has owned Arby's since 1984. Continuing, and with the aid of photo's Mr. Haugland explained his goal is to redevelop two parcels at the corner of West 50th Street and France Avenue. Mr. Haugland said he proposes to replace the current 13,400 square feet of retail space (including Arby's) with 22,500 square feet of new retail space. He added the proposed retail space is all at ground level. Continuing, Mr. Haugland said one thing he believes is important to the project is to widen the sidewalk along France Avenue. He added this proposal would widen the France Avenue sidewalk roughly three additional feet. Mr. Haugland reported another feature in the redevelopment of this area includes constructing 23 condominium units on three levels above the new retail space. Mr. Haugland said parking for condominium owners would be accommodated in a below grade parking garage. Continuing, Mr. Haugland explained to the Commission the project will be constructed in two phases. The first phase would consist of razing Arby's and construction of retail (street level 8,500 square feet) with condo's above. Mr. Haugland said he believes this "phased approach" would reduce disruption for our retail tenants. The second phase consists of razing the remaining retail and constructing new retail with condo units above. Mr. Haugland told the Commission some issues regarding air and subterreran rights are still "up in the 2 air' and it is believed some slight adjustments need to be made. Adjustments also may need to be made concerning the alley and egress /ingress. Chair Byron commented in reviewing the plans it appeared to him the condominiums are setback from the first level retail space. Mr. Young Dixon addressed the Commission and told Chair Byron he is exactly correct in his observation. Mr. Dixon said the residential feature of the development is stepped back significantly offering dimension to the architecture. Mr. Dixon said all units will have an outdoor deck area, however the designed increased setback of the residential units create an outdoor living area that prevents residents from "hanging" over their railing viewing the pedestrians on France Avenue or West 50th Street. Mr. Dixon said this stepped back design feature is especially important on the second level for not only aesthetic reasons but also for safety. Continuing, Mr. Dixon said another feature of the design is to maintain the feel of the France Ave /50th retail stores. Mr. Dixon said careful attention was made to the retail element of the proposal to include a variety of storefronts for an individual city look to the project. Commissioner McClelland asked after Arby's is razed how will the retail elements be incorporated into the new. Mr. Haugland responded as he mentioned previously this proposal will be constructed in phases. He explained the plan is to raze Arby's, begin construction of the new retail /condo's with merchants vacating existing retail and moving into the new spaces before Phase 2 begins. Mr. Benshoof addressed the Commission and explained the traffic study for the redevelopment at 50th Street and France Avenue. Mr. Benshoof said the plan before the Commission this evening removes the existing entrance driveway on France Avenue and retains the existing exit driveway. The development would be served by the existing exit drive and the existing one -way northbound alley connecting to 51 st street, and a new connection to the parking ramp opposite the entrance to the underground parking garage for residents of the condos. Mr. Benshoof explained gates would restrict the connection to the paring ramp with access through this connection only available for residents of the condos. Mr. Benshoof said it is believed the current redevelopment plan would generate fewer trips compared to existing uses and would also generate fewer trips if the alternative development scenario were implemented (50th and France Avenue plan). Commissioner Grabiel asked Mr. Benshoof what would prevent the condo residents from using the alley. Mr. Benshoof said he believes the turning radius may prevent that. Mr. Dick Curtin, 6310 McIntyre, and property owner of the Ampersand building told the Commission he is not opposed to the project but wants the City 3 to carefully examine the proposed development. Mr. Curtin said he has a concern with regard to providing adequate parking, the turn radius and traffic. Mr. Curtin added he is not sure he believes access to the residential element of the proposal is best. Continuing, Mr. Curtin pointed out the layout of the development also appears to convert his sidewalk (north side) to a thoroughfare. He added that sidewalk is maintained by him, and if in the future it is used by residents of the proposed condos who will maintain that sidewalk and what about liability. Chairman Byron asked Mr. Curtin if he believes there is a better alternative to the plans submitted. Mr. Curtin said his first thought was to enter from France Avenue. Commissioner McClelland questioned if that would create a curb cut/sight distance problem. Chair Byron asked Mr. Haugland if he has any response to Mr. Curtin. Mr. Haugland said they could look into the suggestion by Mr. Curtin with regard to France Avenue access, but his first impression is that that would be more dangerous. Mr. Haugland in response to the question regarding the north walkway that they intend to add "Arby's" land to widen it. Mr. Haugland said he has met with Mr. Curtin and is aware of his concerns and will try to address them. Commissioner Losnbury questioned Mr. Benshoof on what he believes is the best access scenario. Mr. Benshoof stated in his opinion the plan presented is best. Commissioner Losnbury asked Mr. Benshoof if another study should be done to determine which approach is best. Mr. Curtin pointed out this proposal is still in preliminary stages with nothing "cast in stone" and told the Commission he still is persuaded parking will not be adequate especially as it relates to guest parking adding Mr. Haugland can also look at different access points. Commissioner Brown asked how often a parking study has been conducted on the ramps. Ms. Aaker told the Commission Planning Staff has conducted a number of parking studies over the years. She added she believes the last study was conducted when renovations were made to the Edina theatre and other retail areas. Mr. Martin Labelle, addressed the Commission and informed them he is a barber in Edina at the northwest intersection of France Avenue and 50th Street. Mr. Labelle said he has a real concern with regard to parking and told the Commission his clients already struggle to find adequate parking spaces. Mr. Labelle questioned if approved as presented where would the retail tenants park? He pointed out street parking on France Avenue is already limited. He stated in his experience the north ramp is heavily used and it isn't uncommon for clients to have to park on the Minneapolis side of the street. 4 Mr. Hosmar Brown, property owner in the area told the Commission he believes the proposal is good and the building is beautiful, but there are bigger issues at work here. He pointed out the 50th and France Avenue retail area used to be a quaint area that now has become an intersection. He said in his experience traffic in this area is already terrible and won't get any better. Mr. Brown said the proposed increase in density can only add to an already difficult traffic situation. Mr. Brown pointed out at 3PM traffic already begins piling up. Mr. Brown acknowledged the ramps are not always full but if the proposed plan eliminates any spaces that presents a problem. Mr. Brown said in his opinion more retail space isn't needed if parking spaces will be decreased, even by a few. Commissioner McClelland commented in her opinion the traffic situation isn't a new problem, and it is possible with better intersection control traffic could be calmed. Mr. Haugland told the Commission he is willing to look into some of the issues pointed out this evening, but informed the Commission there are not a lot of choices available to them. Mr. Haugland said one element that hasn't been mentioned is that Minneapolis doesn't have the ability to provide adequate parking to accommodate their retail and much of their parking needs are met in the City's municipal ramps. Mr. Haugland acknowledged there are a lot of cross over clients between the two cities, but it is a challenge for our side of the street. Mr. Haugland stated he continues to believe pedestrian flow should be encouraged between cities in a safe fashion, noting the parking is what it is. Commissioner Schroeder said if he assumes correctly that the parking plan contained in the 50th and France Avenue plan was based on total build -out, which includes redevelopment of this corner. Ms. Aaker responded that is correct. Continuing, Mr. Schroeder said if he understands correctly this plan proposes a reduction of 3 or 4 parking spaces. Ms. Aaker answered that is correct, but pointed out the City's ramps have increased in parking capacity since that plan was drafted. Commissioner Schroeder commented as he views it any parking shortage should not be attributed to this project. He pointed out parking demand and in and outs could be greatly increased if, lets say a Culver's fast - food restaurant would replace Arby's. Ms. Aaker agreed, the 50th and France Avenue plan did include an increase in retail space. Commissioner Fischer asked Ms. Aaker if the City of Minneapolis and Edina communicate. Ms. Aaker responded the City of Minneapolis sends the City of Edina notice of upcoming developments and we do the same. Commissioner Fischer said in his opinion since the 50th and France Avenue plan was designed to include retail build -out the residential aspect of this proposal could be considered an improvement with regard to parking. Commissioner McClelland said agrees with that observation. 5 Commissioner Lonsbury commented it is true a residential element could be considered an improvement, but in his opinion there 'have been a lot of assumptions made with regard to the City's parking ramps and their capacity. Commissioner Brown asked Ms. Aaker if she knows the total parking capacity for the City's ramps. Ms. Aaker responded she believes there were 889 parking spaces located in the ramps prior to the expansion of the north ramp. She pointed out this of course does not include on street parking spaces. Commissioner Brown said that while he has great respect for the developer and believes he will do an excellent job he is concerned the City is working from a plan developed in the 1970's. Chair Byron asked Ms. Aaker if the cost was shared between the City and the retail property owners when the ramps were constructed and added on -to. Ms. Aaker responded that is correct. It was a joint venture. Commissioner Grabiel added that at least from his experience, he has always found parking availability in the ramps. Ms. Aaker reiterated Planning Staff took ramp counts a number of times, adding the counts were not prefect but staff findings indicated that usually vacant parking spaces were found on the tops of the ramps. The overall capacity averages during "peak" times were between 65 and 75 percent with 92% percent occupancy during the holidays. Commissioner Schroeder commented while reviewing the plans if it would be possible to move the trash storage area. Mr. Haugland responded in his opinion he doesn't believe that is possible because of the existing City easements. He pointed out that trash area is used by a number of tenants. A discussion ensued between Commission Members with regard to issues on residential parking needs and if it would be possible to allow an area in the ramp for overnight guest or owner parking. It was suggested that some form of sticker be used to identify those vehicles. The discussion continued with Commission Members questioning how the voting should proceed. Should the requested ordinance amendment be handled separately or handled along with the requested Conditional Use Permit. Chair Byron said in his opinion there is no reason to "do one without the other'. He pointed out this is a project driven amendment to the zoning ordinance, we all know that, adding he has no problem handling them separately, but both should be acted on. Chair Byron said if handled separately the next question could be do we or do we not proceed on the specific proposal by Mr. Haugland. D Commissioner Losnbury moved to recommend an amendment to the zoning ordinance adding residential dwelling units as a conditional use in the PCD 1,2, and 3 Districts. Commissioner McClelland seconded the motion. Commissioner Lonsbury stated he believes this is an appropriate action to take and directed attention to #3 of the proposed ordinance amendment. Commissioner Lonsbury said he would like to amend the proposed standards for residential dwelling units to read: "Dwelling units with a floor area of 1,500 feet or less shall provide a minimum of 1.75 fully enclosed parking spaces per unit. Dwelling units exceeding 1,500 square feet shall provide a minimum of 2.5 fully enclosed parking spaces per unit. Commissioner Lonsbury explained his reason for the increase is to ensure adequate parking spaces, especially as it relates to guest parking. Commissioner McClelland said she has to withdraw her second, adding she is uncomfortable with those figures. Commissioner Brown seconded Commissioners Lonsbury's motion for purpose of discussion. Commissioner McClelland stated that while she can agree guest parking is a concern she has difficulty requiring multi - residential facilities to exceed the parking standards required for R -1 properties in the City of Edina. Commissioner Lonsbury stated the Commission is recommending a change to the zoning ordinance, pointing out most R -1 properties in Edina have garages, driveways and access to street parking, which in total is more than 2 parking spaces per dwelling. Commissioner Lonsbury pointed out, at least in this situation, street parking is mostly unheard of. Commissioner Schroeder questioned Commissioner Lonsbury's language statement of fully enclosed parking spaces and inquired if part of the ratio could include unenclosed parking spaces. Commissioner Lonsbury said he has no problem with that suggestion, adding he amends his motion to read - for units over 1,500 square feet 2 fully enclosed spaces and % unenclosed parking spaces are required. For units under 1,500 square feet 1.5 fully enclosed spaces and' /4- unenclosed spaces are required. Commissioner McClelland stated she still has a problem with that ratio, pointing out the public ramp can be used to accommodate guest parking, etc. Commissioner Grabiel pointed out the proposed changes to the motion would at least at this point scratch this proposal. Commissioner Lonsbury stressed that is not his intent. He stated an amendment to the ordinance is requested and he is addressing by his motion only the proposed changes to the ordinance not the project. Commissioner Lonsbury stated in his opinion the redevelopment proposal before the Commission this evening is a good proposal and if approved the proposed changes to the ordinance amendment would allow the proponents the opportunity to redevelop with variances Chairman Byron said for clarification unless the first motion is amended what is on the table is a motion and a second to amend the ordinance to read — for units over 1,500 square feet 2.5 fully enclosed spaces and for units under 7 1.500 square foot 1.75 fully enclosed spaces. Commissioner Lonsbury withdrew that motion. Commissioner Brown moved to recommend adding residential dwelling units as a conditional use in the PCD -1, 2, and 3 Districts and standards for residential dwelling units # 3 to read. Dwelling units with a floor area of 1,500 square feet or less shall provide a minimum of 1.5 fully enclosed parking spaces per unit and' /4 unenclosed parking spaces per unit. Dwelling units exceeding 1,500 square feet shall provide a minimum of 2.0 fully enclosed parking spaces- per unit and ' /z unenclosed parking spaces per unit. Commissioner Lonsbury seconded the motion. Commissioner Brown added his intent is to amend the amended ordinance_ ; and in no way is it directed at this project. Commissioner Grabiel reiterated if the motion before us is adopted what does that do to this proposal. Chair Bryon responded he is not sure and directed that question to Mr. Haugland. Mr. Haugland stated he doesn't believe it is fair to respond to that question. He said in all good faith they can't supply the parking. He pointed out the fully enclosed parking could possibly be met but the unenclosed parking would be impossible to meet. Commissioner Lonsbury said the proposed motion to amend the ordinance doesn't take into consideration the proposal before the Commission this evening or for that matter any future proposals. He added as a city looking ,at redevelopment he believes it is important that adequate parking is provided, and his intent by this motion is limited to the ordinance amendment. Mr. Haugland said he has no response to the proposed changes to the amendment to the ordinance as stipulated by Commissioners Brown and Lonsbury. Commissioner Byron said if he understands correctly, if adopted, absent the ability of this proposal to obtain variances to comply with the proposed amendment, what is dictated would be required. Mr. Haugland responded the development team would have to go back and re -visit the proposal and look into the possibility of eliminating one floor. Mr. Haugland said he believes in all confidence that won't occur and he would construct all commercial as dictated by the adopted 50th & France commercial area plan. Commissioner Fischer said being new to the Commission he was somewhat surprised Edina had an ordinance prohibiting the mix of commercial with residential. Commissioner Fischer said in his opinion the parking requirements are and should be different in different zones of the city. He said the beauty of mixed use is that guests may arrive at hours businesses are not operating thereby avoiding congestion. Commissioner Fischer added he has a fear with the parking numbers suggested that no development or redevelopment for that matter could achieve those standards. He pointed out Edina is no longer LV green fields. Commissioner Fischer concluded he may be wrong, but his intuition tells him those numbers are too high, acknowledging he can't tell you that factually. Commissioner Schroeder echoed Commissioner Fischer's comments and stated in his experience the figures Commissioners Lonsbury and Brown are proposing are significantly higher then what most cities are looking at in terms of redevelopment. Commissioner Schroeder pointed out if parking ratios change as recommended this is not the only area in Edina that would have to follow those guidelines. He pointed out Edina is continually looking for opportunities to provide affordable housing He pointed out if burdened with unnecessarily high parking ratios that may limit the ability of the city to redevelop other commercial areas where the square footage of the housing units and price are less then what is proposed this evening. Commissioner Schroeder said it is entirely possible Edinborough would not have been able to be developed under the requirements proposed by Commissioners Brown and Lonsbury. Mr. Haugland told the Commission Mr. Benshoof has been working with developers on two projects in downtown Minneapolis and asked the Commission if they would like to hear how the parking was handled in those instances. Mr. Benshoof addressed the Commission and explained at present he is working with developers on two high rise towers in downtown Minneapolis. Mr. Benshoof explained one project is complete "Grand Park ", and the "Carlyle" proposed along the river near the Post Office is not complete. At Grand Park parking requirements are 1.35 spaces per unit regardless of unit size. Mr. Benshoof said the reason the parking requirement of 1.35 is due to the proximity of the development to downtown. It is believed for both projects that residents are people that won't require two vehicles. Many are move down buyers who consolidate to one car and address most of their needs locally on foot. Mr. Benshoof added at the Grand extra parking stalls are available. Mr. Benshoof said the Carlyle requires a larger parking ratio of 1.45 stalls per unit with the same concept - parking is based on unit numbers not size. Concluding, Mr. Benshoof reported he is finishing a project in Maple Grove with a parking requirement of 2 spaces per unit. It is felt in Maple Grove extra parking could be accommodated on the street. Maple Grove also has an ordinance that prohibits on street parking after midnight. Mr. Benshoof stated in his opinion the recommended parking ratio is high, especially for urban infill projects. Commissioner Fisher cautioned against using this project to solve an existing parking problem. He said in his opinion the recommended 2.5 parking stalls (no matter the scale of the project) is the largest he has ever seen in terms of redevelopment. Commissioner Fischer added, and he may be wrong, that many of the perspective buyers will probably be "move down" from within the community that will embrace the near amenities. 0 Chair Byron called for a vote on the amendment to the zoning ordinance. Nays, Schroeder, Fischer, McClelland, Grabiel, Byron. Ayes, Lonsbury, Brown. Motion failed. Commissioner Grabiel moved to recommend an amendment to the ordinance adding residential dwelling units as a conditional use in the PCD -1, 2, and 3 districts as indicated by staff. Commissioner Fisher seconded the motion. Ayes; Schroeder, Fischer, McClelland, Grabiel and Byron. Nays, Brown, Lonsbury. Motion carried. Chair Byron said Haugland Companies is before the Commission requesting a Conditional Use Permit and if no further discussion called for a motion. Commissioner Grabiel moved to recommend Conditional Use Permit approval subject to final adoption of an Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance, easements as required for building and public utilities and Watershed District Permit(s). Commissioner Fischer seconded the motion. Commissioner. McClelland said that while she is in support of the proposal she is hesitant to vote on this motion. She added, at least in her opinion, there are still some unanswered questions especially concerning the air and subterranean rights, exit on /off France Avenue and garbage /recycling placement. Commissioner McClelland stated she believes this is a great redevelopment of the coiner reiterating she is still hesitant and suggested continuing the hearing until some of issues are better addressed. Commissioner Fischer questioned if this is the only time the Commission as a body will hear this proposal. Chair Byron responded if he understands correctly staff recommends preliminary approval of the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance and preliminary approval of the Conditional Use Permit, which indicates this will return to the Commission when everything or nearly everything is in its final form. Commissioner Lonsbury added he agrees with that interpretation. Commissioner Fisher said in his opinion a continuance at this time probably wouldn't change things in the preliminary stages. He added he agrees there are "loose ends" remaining but believes the proponent will resolve those issues. Continuing, Commissioner Fischer pointed out there is always the possibility that tomorrow a similar project could be proposed on the Minneapolis side of France Avenue without any input from the City. He added it is in our favor at this time that the review and approval process is in the hands of the City of Edina. Continuing, Commission Fischer said with all do respect to the business owners regarding parking, that he has never met a business owner that believe they have enough parking and he would be disappointed if business owners said they have enough parking. Commissioner Fischer pointed out in viewing the two 10 aerial photos the top decks of the ramps appear empty. He added he believes there is enough parking to support this project acknowledging that not all spaces could be considered convenient. Concluding, Commissioner Fischer said at this time he believes the submitted proposal is well done and designed with careful consideration. He stated he does not believe there are any reasons to delay this project. Mr. Haugland said, as he understood from planning staff a final plan would need to be presented to the Commission and Council. Mr. Haugland apologized to the Commission for bringing up a number of issues in the preliminary stages that probably shouldn't have been brought up until they were resolved. He added he believes the air and subterranean easements will soon be resolved. Chair Byron told the Commission he has been relatively slow in his own mind in appreciating the mixed -use concept. He added he now better understands the point often made that mixed use is a way to reduce density by mixing uses resulting in a positive impact on traffic and parking while at the same time allowing a property owner the ability to improve their property. Continuing, Chair Byron commented from the discussion this evening and in viewing projects in other communities that a proposal such as this appears to be very attractive to many people. Chair Byron commented when he received his packet containing the request for an amendment change and conditional use permit the first thing he did was drive France Avenue focusing on the southwest corner. Chair Byron added he was struck by the impression that this corner is crying out for redevelopment. He pointed out the age of the structures create the need for change. Chair Byron said the renovation on the Minneapolis (Pinehurst) side of the street appears to be generating redevelopment, which may continue along both sides of France in the future. Chair Byron agreed with observations on traffic congestion and wouldn't consider minimizing the present traffic situation but believes if done correctly this proposal should not exacerbate traffic or parking. Concluding Chair Byron said he supports the proposal. Chair Byron called for the vote recommending approval of a conditional use permit subject to staff conditions: Ayes; Schroeder, Fischer, Grabiel, Brown Lonsbury, Byron. Abstain, McClelland. Motion carried. 11 LD -05 -1 Lot Division 6920 Hillside Lane 5524 West 70th Street Ms. Aaker informed the Commission the applicant proposes to transfer a strip of land measuring approximately 5 feet by 124 feet from the lot on Hillside Lane to the rear of the lot at 5524 West 70th Street. Ms. Aaker concluded the proposed lot division would cure the encroachment of a brick patio and shed of the 70th Street house on the property of the house on Hillside Lane. Commissioner McClelland moved to recommend lot division approval. Commissioner Fischer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Ill. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 10:00 PM Jackie Hoogenakker 12 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA ZONING BOARD THUESDAY, NOVEMBER 18,2004,5:30 PM EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 4801 WEST 50TH STREET MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Goof Workinger, Mike.Lewis, Edward Schwartzbauer and Rodney Hardy MEMBERS ABSENT: William Skallerud STAFF PRESENT: Kris Aaker and Jackie Hoogenakker I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: The minutes of the September 16, 2004 meeting were filed as submitted. II. NEW BUSINESS: B -04-60 Todd and Linda Watchmaker 4527 Bruce Ave. Lot 18, Block 3, Country Club District Request: A 2.25 ft side yard setback variance Ms. Aaker informed the Board the subject property is located on the east side of Bruce Ave. consisting of a two -story Mediterranean style home with a detached two -car garage. The homeowners are hoping to remove a one -story addition off of the back of the home and replace it with a two -story addition. The addition will extend into the rear yard 5 ft beyond where the existing back wall of the home is currently located. The first floor will include a new mudroom and family room. The second floor will include a bedroom and office nook addition. The finished materials will match the existing (stucco). Ms. Aaker concluded the homeowner is hoping to correct mold and rot problems along the backside of the home and in so doing hoping to add onto the home and maintain the existing nonconforming setback. Given the slight addition to the building footprint and continuation of the existing setback, impact would be minimal on neighboring property. Mr. Bruce Most, contractor was present to respond to questions. Ms. Smith, 4521 Bruce Avenue, told the Board too much construction has been occurring along her block and her home has suffered structural damage as a result of neighboring construction projects (directly adjacent). Mr. Lewis addressed Ms. Smith and informed her she should talk with the homeowner(s) or their contractor if her home suffered any damage as a result of the continuing construction. Mr. Hardy interjected and explained to Ms. Smith this is not the correct forum to address her concerns. He suggested speaking (if all else fails) with building department officials informing them of her continued problems. Chair Workinger agreed and told Ms. Smith she can also contact the City Manager if problems continue to arise. A discussion ensued with board members in agreement the proposed addition to the home is modest in scope and scale and should not adversely impact the neighborhood, adding they support the request as submitted. Mr. Lewis moved variance approval subject to the plans presented and the use. of matching materials noting the non - conforminity of the house. Mr. Hardy seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. B -04-61 Brent and Becky Hollenkamp 5813 St. Johns Ave. Lot 21, Block 6, Fairfax Addition Request: A 5 ft front yard setback variance Ms. Aaker informed the board the subject property is located on the east side of St. Johns consisting of a 1 Y2 -story home. The property owner is hoping to add a 5 x 7 ft addition to the front of the house to provide an enclosed front entry. The Zoning Ordinance requires that the proposed addition conform to the front yard setback requirement, which is established by averaging the front yard setbacks along the block between intersections or by matching the setbacks of the neighboring homes. All of the homes along the block are located 35 ft to the front lot line. The variance would allow a 30 ft front yard setback for the home. Ms. Aaker concluded the entryway is a small addition to a home with limited space and opportunity for a family dinning area. The design of the addition blends architecturally with the home and would not be intrusive or offensive to the block or the neighborhood. Staff supports the request subject to the plans presented. N The proponents, Mr. and Mrs. Hollenkamp were present to respond to questions. Chair Workinger asked Ms. Aaker if the addition were entirely unenclosed would it require a variance. Ms. Aaker responded if entirely unenclosed it would not require a variance, however, the closet and entry area is enclosed so the need for a variance arose. She explained the ordinance was changed last year to allow residents to achieve a front "unenclosed" entry not to exceed 80 square feet and be no closer than 20 feet to the front property line. Ms. Aaker said in her experience most stoops are roughly 50 square feet plus which is the reasoning behind the 80 square foot limit. Reiterating Ms. Aaker stated because of the enclosed nature of the front entry addition the need for a variance was triggered. Mr. Schwartzbauer moved variance approval subject to the plans presented. Mr. Lewis seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. B -04-62 Barbra Osadcky 4378 Brook Ave. Lot 8, Block 8, Browndale Park Request: A 31/2 inch side yard setback variance for a room addition Ms. Aaker reported the subject property is located on the west side of Brook Ave. consisting of a one and one half story home. The homeowner is hoping add onto the back of the home to include an expanded master bedroom and family room. The homeowner's contractor applied for a building permit and upon having a survey done it was found that the south wall of the home is located 9.7 ft to the side lot line. The minimum side yard setback for properties that have lot widths of 75 ft or greater is 10 ft. Lots less than 75 ft in width are allowed a 5 ft side yard setback. The subject lot is exactly 75 ft in width so a 10 ft side yard setback is required. The house was built slightly nonconforming and could have been a field error during construction. The addition will be a dramatic improvement to the home and will not compromise the ordinance or negatively impact adjacent property. Ms. Aaker concluded the request is very slight and is to continue an existing nonconforming setback. Staff supports the request subject to the plans presented. 3 The proponent Ms. Osadcky was present to respond to questions. After a brief discussion Mr. Lewis moved variance approval subject to the plans presented and the use of like materials, noting the existing non - conforminity of the house. Mr. Schwartzbauer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. B -04-63 William and Lori Skallerud 5820 Northwood Drive Lot 14, Block 2, Mirror Lake Edina Request: A 6 ft front yard setback variance to Locate a new house matching the existing Front yard setback. Ms. Aaker informed the board the subject property is located on the north side of Northwood Drive consisting of a rambler with an attached garage. The lot backs up to Interlachen golf course. The property owners intend to remove the existing home and rebuild on the lot. The existing front yard setback of the home is 56 ft. The homeowner is hoping to rebuild on the property while maintaining the existing 56 ft front yard setback. The existing home is nonconforming regarding front yard setback. The existing home is 6 ft forward of the established front yard setback. Ms. Aaker explained generally city staff and the Zoning Board have appreciated the historical context of an existing front yard setback. In that regard the existing home has enjoyed a 56ft front yard setback since the time of it's construction with the existing setback not adversely affecting the neighboring properties or the neighborhood in general. The Zoning Board has approved variances in the past to maintain existing front yard setbacks given that it is a property right that has always been enjoyed in the past. The Zoning Board is protective of maintaining setback, however, has not generally been supportive of allowing a new home closer than the established setback of the original home. The proposal is to maintain the existing setback of the house with some portions of the house farther from the front lot line than the existing home. In no areas will the home be forward of the existing front yard setback of the home currently occupying the property. Ms. Aaker concluded staff supports the request given that the existing home has always historically enjoyed the proposed setback and given that a deeper setback may be more impacting on the adjacent property to the east. 4 The proponent, Mr. William Skallerud was present to respond to questions. Mr. Skallerud informed board members he spoke with immediate neighbors with no issues raised. Mr. Hardy said if he understands correctly the new house will maintain the same front yard setback as the existing house did. Ms. Aaker responded that is correct Mr. Hardy moved approval of a 6 -foot front yard setback variance, noting the new home will enjoy the same setback as the existing home and that deepening the setback may result in a negative impact on adjoining properties. Mr. Lewis seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Ill. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 6:10 PM Jackie Hoogenakker 5 1' EDINA COMMUNITY HEALTH COMMITTEE MEETING Tuesday, December 7, 2004 Community Room City Hall MEMBERS PRESENT: Lynn Moline, Bill Alldredge, Brad Montgomery, Tolu Oyelowo, Idelle Longman MEMBERS ABSENT: Richard Olson, Debbie Cook, and Spencer Anderson OTHERS PRESENT: Roz Johnson, Bloomington Public Health STAFF PRESENT: Solvei Wilmot ROLL CALL The meeting was called to order at 7:10 p.m. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A correction was made to the Minutes of the September 21, 2004 meeting. A date reference was incorrect. Ms. Moline, MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 21, 2004, MEETING AS CORRECTED. Mr. Montgomery SECONDED. MOTION CARRIED. TOBACCO UPDATE Ms. Johnson distributed an update on Hennepin County's Ordinance #24. This is a no smoking Ordinance that will go into effect on March 31, 2005. It will impact all establishments that serve food. Ms. Johnson reported that she has been in meetings with Minneapolis, Bloomington, Richfield and Edina to work on educational information regarding the smoking ban and to track if the smoking ban has a financial impact. MPAT, Minnesota Partnership Against Tobacco will help fund the education portion. MPAT is also looking at economic impact, change in public opinion, smoking cessation and air quality. Ms. Johnson presented an example of signage for establishments. The signs will have the local enforcement agency phone number. The signs will be posted in March. A member inquired when Bloomington's smoking ban starts. Ms. Johnson commented that their ban starts March 31 also. PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Ms. Johnson presented information on Public Health Emergency Preparedness (PHEP). Which is preparing for and responding to bioterrorism, emerging infectious disease outbreaks and other public health threats and emergencies. A part of PHEP is an Emergency and Risk Communication plan. The plan outlines the people who should be contacted should there be a major emergency event. One of the communication forms that has been established is the Health Alert Network. Health information is distributed either by e-mail or FAX pertinent health professionals. Television is also being used to quickly notify special and limited English populations through Twin Cities Public Television's ECHO (Emergency & Community Health Outreach) program. Ms. Johnson commented about the Medical Reserve Corp. This is a statewide program that is seeking medical personnel that would be available to assist during a major health event. More information. is available at Hennepin County's website: www.mrc- hennepin.org Commission members suggested getting information to the Minnesota Medical Association about the Medical Reserve Corp. Ms. Johnson commented that some police departments have Citizens Emergency Response Training (CERT) which is a program for citizens to volunteer and prepare for emergency readiness. A member inquired about flu shot vaccine security. Ms. Johnson.'said that is something the State has been looking into. STATE COMMUNITY HEALTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE ( SCHAC) UPDATE Ms. Wilmot commented that at the September meeting the SCHAC committee presented information regarding formula change for funding distribution. The potential change could reduce the amount Edina receives from the State grant. However, more discussion is pending. Ms. Longman I commented there was. information regarding emergency preparedness, food allergies, teen pregnancy, and early intervention with emotion behavior disorders. Ms. Longman commented about being able to speak with Commissioner Diane Mandernach one on one at the conference. The Keynote speaker was Janet Porter regarding "The Power of One ". She had a very effective and good presentation regarding an individual's ability to effect a change. OTHER BUSINESS Tri -City Steering Committee Ms. Longman commented that committee members are invited to attended Tri -City Steering Committee meetings. It consists of members from Richfield, Edina and Bloomington focused on prevention, education, and health promotion issues. The meetings are quarterly, 3:30 — 5:30 p.m. Edina Community Health Committee 2005 Meetings. The committee agreed on the meeting dates of March 17, May 17, September 20 and November 15. Human Rights and Relations Committee Ms. Longman reported that the Human Rights and Relations Committee hosted an Intergenerational Dialogue on October 2. Sixty people participated and had good feedback. The Human Rights and Relations Committee has a subcommittee on Bullying, members are invited to participate. Let Ms. Longman know if you are interested. Home Health Services and Contract with Bloomington Public Health Ms. Wilmot commented that Bloomington Public Health provide home health nursing services to Edina residents through a contract. Bloomington Public Health is no longer providing that service due to budget cutting issues and because that service is available from private businesses. Members inquired how many residents received the service in the past year. Ms. Wilmot commented that the nursing program had seen twenty residents; seven were on a consistent need. Eighteen of those residents would be able to receive service from a private nursing service and two would need financial assistant in order to receive nursing service. A member inquired about the contract. Ms. Wilmot stated that approximately forty percent of the contract is for Home Health Services, which is the category that the nursing services are under. Members discussed the limited number of residents that the program served and the high cost of the program. Consideration to enhancing senior programs was made. It was decided to look at the priority list that has previously been developed and consider the options. ADJOURNMENT Ms. Moline MOTIONED TO AJOURN. Mr. Montgomery SECONDED. MEETING ADJOURNED 8:50 p.m. MINUTES FEBRUARY 16, 2005 EDINA RECYCLING AND SOLID WASTE COMMISSION COMMUNITY CONFERENCE ROOM MEMBERS PRESENT: Bill Bryan, Inna Hays and Mariko "Marley" Hanson MEMBERS ABSENT: Kathy Frey, Anne Cronin and Tim Brownell GUEST: Rich Hirstein, BFI STAFF PRESENT: Solvei Wilmot, Recycling Coordinator ROLL CALL Bill Bryan, Chair, called the meeting to order at 7:10 a.m. MINUTES Corrections were made to the January 19, 2005 minutes. A correction to the Motion was made. Mr. Bryan MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES AS CORRECTED FROM THE JANUARY 19, 2005. Inna Hays SECONDED. MOTION CARRIED. RECYCLING IN SCHOOLS Ms. Frey was preparing a report regarding recycling collection in the schools. Her report will be presented at the next meeting. Ms. Hanson reported that most classrooms in the High School have a container to collect paper. The plastic bottles are collected in the hallway. Recycling participation could be better by the students. Ms. Hanson will look into having an announcement made to the student body regarding recycling. VOLUNTEER AWARDS Ms. Wilmot inquired about any nominees for the Recycling Award. Ms. Hays has nominated the Edina Park Plaza for their recycling. Members will discuss this at the next meeting. BOARDS AND COMMISSION ANNUAL MEETING Ms. Wilmot commented that the annual boards and commission meeting will be held Tuesday, March 29, 2005, Centennial Lakes, 5:00 p.m. An invitation will be mailed from the Edina City Council. OTHER BUSINESS National Recycling Coalition (NRC) The NRC conference will be held in Minneapolis in August 28 -31, 2005. More information will be coming regarding the conference. Members discussed ways to promote recycling in schools. Mr. Hirstein commented that BFI would be willing to assist with some promotional material. Discussion regarding Earth Day. ADJOURNMENT Inna MOVED TO ADJOURN. Marley SECONDED. MOTION CARRIED. 7:55 A.M. MllNICIPAL LBGISLAM League of Minnesota Cities Building 145 University Avenue West, Suite 450 St. Paul, MN 55103 Telephone: (651) 228 -9757 Facsimile: (651) 228 -9787 UPDATE 2005 -01 March 16, 2005 MLC OPPOSES GOVERNOR PAWLENTY'S MVHC CUTS Governor Pawlenty has recommended extending the cuts in Market Value Homestead Credit (MVHC) reimbursement for 103 cities in his biennial budget recommendation. In 2003, the legislature imposed approximately $20 million in annual cuts to the MVHC reimbursement (mainly to those cities that received little or no LGA) for two years. The MVHC reimbursement payments to those 103 cities was scheduled to be restored beginning with taxes payable 2005. The Governor's bill (HF 660 Krinkie/ SF 753 Ortman) proposes an extension of the cuts for two more years, which would save the state approximately $38 million over the biennium. The cut has a significant financial impact to the MLC communities, which stand to loose approximately $20 million out of $38 million in statewide cuts. See chart below for specific MLC city impact: City MVHC cut '04 Apple Valley 1,112,293 Bloomington 1,630,492 Burnsville 1,231,999 Eagan 1,153,562 Eden Prairie 763,466 Edina 452,522 Maple Grove 979,793 Maplewood 268,296 Minnetonka 706,708 Plymouth 689,350 Shoreview 428,437 Woodbury 857,007 Totals 10,273,926 MLC opposes MVHC reimbursement cuts to selected cities. However, if the legislature chooses to implement the Governor's recommendations, at a minimum, we believe that cities should be removed from the administration of the homestead credit. Member Cities: Apple Valley, Bloomington, Burnsville, Eagan, Eden Prairie, Edina, Maple Grove, Maplewood, Minnetonka, Plymouth, Shoreview, Woodbury The MLC Update is prepared by Nilani Jayatilaka and Thomas J. Poul Messerli & Kramer P.A., 145 University Avenue West, Suite 450, St. Paul, MN 55103 Telephone: 651.228.9757 Fax: 651.228.9787 E -mail: niavatilakawintandklaw.com and tpoul @mandklaw.com MLC SUPPORTS CHANGING THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE MARKET VALUE HOMESTEAD CREDIT The MVHC is a statewide program for homeowner property tax relief. The state pays a portion of each qualifying homeowner's property taxes up to a maximum of $304. The MVHC is not a payment to the homeowner, but a reduction in the taxes paid by the homeowner and the credit amount is actually part of the city's certified levy. The MVHC reimbursement does not reduce a city's levy like the LGA program. When cities establish their budgets, they are unaware of the dollar amount of MVHC for which their city homeowner may qualify. When the County Auditor calculates property tax statements for each homeowner, the city's total levy is spread among all property types, but the homeowner's is reduced by an amount equal to the city's proportional share of the qualifying amount of the homeowner's MVHC. The amount of reduction of the homeowner's property taxes is then paid to the city by the State of Minnesota. When the state fails to reimburse cities for their share of the MVHC, it is a direct loss to the city's budget. The MLC believes that the state should. be. honest with the property tax payer. As a result, the MLC supports legislation requiring MVHC reductions to a city be reflected on the homeowner's property tax statement. MLC SUPPORTS'S.F. 073 (BELANGER) /H.F. 851 (LENCZEWSKI): FISCAL DISPARITIES STUDY Senator Bill Belanger (R- Bloomington) and Representative Ann Lenczewski (DFL- Bloomington) have introduced S.F. 073 /H.F. 851 the Metropolitan Area Fiscal Disparities. Program Study. The bill would require legislative fiscal staff to conduct a study 'of the metropolitan revenue distribution (fiscal disparities) program and report to the legislature by February 1, 2006 on findings and recommendations. The study will primarily address the question of whether the program is achieving the purposes for which it was created. Furthermore the study will try to address the following questions: 1) How has the program affected property tax disparities across the Twin Cities metropolitan area? 2) Is the formula for contributing tax base to the area wide pool reasonable? 3) Is the formula for distributing tax base to the area wide pool reasonable? 4) Does the program help promote orderly growth and encourage environmentally sound land use? 5) Does the program reduce competition for commercial - industrial tax base between communities? 6) Do local governments derive sufficient tax revenues from commercial - industrial property to cover the costs of providing services to the property, considering the tax base that must be contributed to the area wide pool? 7) Could improvements be made to the administration of the program? The MLC supports reexamining the fiscal disparities program. Link to S.F. 073: http• / /www revisor leg state mn us /bin /bidbill php ?bill= S0073.0 &session =ls84 Link to H.F. 851: http://www.revisor leg.state.mn.us/bin/bldbill.php?bill=H0851.0&session=ls84 -2- /r MLC OPPOSES GOVERNOR PAWLENTY'S TURBOCHARGED TRUTH IN TAXATION On Wednesday, March 10'h Governor Pawlenty and House Taxes Committee Chairman Phil Krinkie (R- Shoreview) laid out a proposal for "turbocharged truth in taxation" -- a notification mechanism that would make it easier for property owners to block property tax increases by city and county governments. The proposed system (which would require legislative approval) would work like this: attached to the bottom of the annual notices of planned property tax changes -- the truth in taxation notices, mailed in November — would be a simple new survey designed to determine whether taxpayers are satisfied with the city's and county's proposed tax levy. The detachable form would ask taxpayers two questions (the proposal does not include school districts): 1) Are you satisfied with the proposed property tax levy for the county? 2) Are you satisfied with the proposed property tax levy for the city? If the number of mailed -in "no" responses exceeded 20 percent of the total parcels of property in the jurisdiction, a referendum would be triggered, and voters would be able to choose between two options: the proposed levy, almost always an increase, or freezing it at the prior year's level. Property owners would get a vote on the triggering mechanism for each parcel they own, meaning those with more than one parcel would get more than one vote. Renters would not vote. 1 See details below for how the plan would unfold: Nov. 9 -21: Truth in taxation notices with new "taxpayer satisfaction surveys" are sent to taxpayers. Dec. 1: Surveys must be received to be counted. Dec. 8: Results of survey are announced. If "no" responses exceed 20 percent of total parcels of property in the jurisdiction, a referendum would be triggered. Dec. 15: Deadline to recertify levy at previous level to prevent referendum. Dec. 28: Tentative final levy certification. Jan. 31: If triggered, referendum would be held, with voters choosing between proposed levy for 2006 and the actual levy for 2005. Referendum would be open to all qualified voters, not just property taxpayers. Note: The survey would not apply to school districts and townships or cities with a population under 500. Source: Governor's office The proposal has drawn criticism from local government groups. "Leaders of umbrella organizations for city and county government said the proposal contains several procedural problems, one being that the timetable laid out would schedule a referendum one month after cities have certified their annual budgets. It's government by polling, asking for a simplistic response to complex issues," said Jim Mulder, executive director of the Association of Minnesota Counties. "Elected county officials spend months making difficult decisions, and citizens would spend seconds on one small part of the decision." (Star Tribune, Smith, 3.10.05). The MLC opposes Governor Pawlenty's proposal, because it imposes limitations on local decision making. The Turbocharged Truth in Taxation proposal significantly limits the predictability necessary for local governments to plan with financial confidence. 1 Details provided by the Star Tribune "Pawlenty seeks tax - increase blocker" (Smith, 3/10/05). -3- JOHN A. McHUGH 5225 GRANDVIEW SQUARE. #214 EDINA. MINNESOTA 55436 Y -Aoov, ! (4, -LO vs 4�4e� a-,� ,c,Q,ae4 1 g Pie , Y- i.A Z V Ale � 1; (/' j�' 'i "�/ �; .;'�, j ��,'�` .� � y .yam: •,� +�" ,,� .l - � 1 .; " . , 1 621 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 273 Regular Meeting, March 21, 2005 Room 349, Edina Community Center AGENDA Determination of Quorum and Call to Order Approval of Minutes of Meeting of February 28, 2005 Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting of March 3, 2005 HEARINGS OF INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS, AND PRESENTATION OF PETITIONS FROM THE PUBLIC REGARDING ITEMS BEFORE THE BOARD FOR ACTION OR ON ANY OTHER ISSUE ( *SEE ATTACHED DETAIL.) PRESENTATIONS "We Care, We Dare, We Share" Learning Experiences at South View Middle School — Principal Trevor Johnson; .Teachers Michelle Schulze, Claude Sigmund, and Heidi Howard; and Students Amy Jordan, Joe Leon, Megan Gaard, Lauren Densinger, and Matt Briggs ➢ Alliance for Student Achievement Rally Media Coverage and Legislative Update — Dr. Kenneth Dragseth, Superintendent, and Laura Tueting Nelson, Director of Communications and Public Affairs REPORTS ➢ Community Education Services Fund Budget -Karin Rutter, Community Education Services Board Chair, and Doug Johnson, Director of Community Education Services -and Facilities ➢ School Improvement Planning — Maria Giampietro, Director of Administrative Services, and John Devine, Normandale Elementary School Principal ➢ CBOC — Peyton Robb, Board of Education ACTION 364 365 366 367 368 369 369a 369b Personnel Recommendations Insurance Consultant Edina Public Schools Equipment Sale Purchase of Materials for Elementary Language Arts Program Student Teaching Agreement with Luther College Edina High School Distributive Education Clubs of America (DECA) National Leadership Conference Asbestos Abatement at South View Middle School Elementary School Deferred Maintenance Bids, appended CONSENT 370 Community Education Services Personnel Recommendations 371 Gift from Patricia Danforth 372 Gift from Wells Fargo 373 Gift from Edina Girls Athletic Association 374 Gift from Perry and Rosemary Larson 622 -625 626 627 628 -630 631` -632 633 -634 634a 634b 635 636 637 638 639 375 Gift from the Wachovia Foundation 640 376 Gift from Anonymous Donor 641 377 Gift from Target 642 378 Gifts from Edina Education Fund 643 DISCUSSION Revised Procedure 1330 — Community Relations: Use of School 674 Facilities, appended 379 Revised Policy 1600 — Community Relations: Relations Between 644 -645 675 -676 Nonpublic and Other Educational Organizations and the Schools Revised Procedure 4222 — Licensed Personnel: Area Leader 380 Revised Policy 1610X20 — Community Relations: Relations with 646 -648 682 -684 Parochial /Private Schools Services Governance CES Board- Structure 381 Revised Policy 2000.1 —Administration: Equal Opportunity 649 -651 382 Revised Policy 2000.2 — Administration: Commitment to Diversity 652 -653 383 Revised Policy 5139 — Students: Hazing Prohibition 654 -657 384 Revised Policy 6200 — Instruction- Community Education Services 658 -659 Statement of Mission Student Adventure Leadership Team (SALT) Service- 385 Revised Policy 6210 — Instruction: Community Education Services 660 -661 386 Revised Policy 6216 - Instruction: Community Education Financial 662 -663 691 Support Debate Team to Lexington, Kentucky 387 Deleted Policy 6216.1 — Instruction: Fees for Community Education 664 -665 388 Revised Policy 7430 — New Construction: Change Orders 666 -667 INFORMATION 389 Expenditures Payable on March 14, 2005, appended 668 _ 390 Bond Fund Expenditures Payable on March 3, 2005 669 -670 391 Bond Fund Expenditures Payable on March 17, 2005 671 -672 392 Enrollment as of February 25, 2005 673 393 Revised Procedure 1330 — Community Relations: Use of School 674 Facilities, appended 394 Revised Procedure 2000.2 — Administration: Commitment to Diversity 675 -676 395 Revised Procedure 4222 — Licensed Personnel: Area Leader 677 -681 396 Revised Procedure 6201.1 — Instruction: Community Education 682 -684 Services Governance CES Board- Structure - 397 Revised Procedure 6201.2 — Community Education Services 685 -687 Governance Organization Chart 398 Community Education Services Habitat for Humanity Service Trip to 688 Charleston, South Carolina 399 Student Adventure Leadership Team (SALT) Service- 689 -690 Learning /Backpacking Expedition to Superior Hiking Trail 400 Highlands Grade 2 Voyageur Environmental Camp 691 401 Debate Team to Lexington, Kentucky 692 402 Debate Team to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 693 403 Boys' Varsity Golf Team to Brainerd, Minnesota 694 404 Recognition of Staff 695 Adjournment *Persons who wish to address the Board are requested to complete and submit an appropriate form to the Board Secretary prior to the designated hearing time. When recognized, each individual shall identify himself /herself and the group represented, if any. He /She shall then state the reason for addressing the Board and shall be limited in time at the discretion of the Board Chair. Individual employees of the School District or representatives of employee organizations shall have utilized administrative procedures before making a request to address the Board. The City of Edina V\J E L C 0 I'VAI E S you and your guests! Family outings, gatherings of neighborhood groups and business meetings all bring people closer together. The City of Edina nurtures that spirit by making many of its facilities available for private rental. Whether you need a room by the lake to impress your business clients, or an indoor garden to celebrate your wedding, you can rent the ideal facility from the City of Edina. The following is a list of the City's various rental facilities, complete with descriptions and a list of amenities so you can choose the ideal location for your meeting or celebration. Each listing also includes contact informatio so you can find more information and get in touch with the people who secure your reservation. You have the benefit of Edina's parks and facilities for your own private use. All facilities feature free parking. Please make yourself at home! Braemar Arena, 7501 Ikola Way, is an indoor facility that keeps ice ready for year -round skating and hockey. The Arena can he rented by groups looking to make skating part of their private celebrations. Anyone interested in renting ice can visit the Minnesota Ice Arena Manager Association's Rink Finder website, www.rinkfinder.com, to check availability.A deposit of $20 per hour plus applicable tax is required one day prior to the rental. For more information, call Braemar Arena, 952- 941 -1322. Clubhouse The Warren C. Hyde Clubhouse at Braemar Golf Course provides a friendly setting for meetings and banquets. Visitors can rent the Braemar Room year -round and seat approximately 200 guests. Whether guests relax on the deck or hire a disc jockey or band and make use of the dance floor, the Braemar Room can serve most types of gatherings. From October to March, the Braemar Room can be expanded to include the Clubhouse and Grill to accommodate another 50 guests. Renters must hire off-premise caterers subject to approval by the City of Edina. Beer and wine are permitted in the Braemar Room, as long as guests use Braemar's bartending service. The Harry Cooper Lounge is a more manageable space for meetings of 15 to 35 people-The lounge is located in the lower level of the Clubhouse and overlooks the course. Both the Harry Cooper Lounge and the Braemar Room S h audio-visual equipment available for business ntations. For more information, call the Clubhouse Manager, 952 - 82791. The colorful foliage and architecture surrounding a 10- acre lake make Centennial Lakes Park a lovely location to meet with friends or business associates. Visitors canquietly use the swinging benches and walking paths around the park, or enjoy more rousing putting, lawn bowling and croquet games. From mid ,'March through the first week in December, individuals and groups can rent space in the Park Centrum that are perfect for meetings, banquets or other parties. The Centrum has fireplaces and floor -to- ceiling windows overlooking the lake and gardens.The Centrum's Parlor and Fireside rooms comfortably seat 72 and 40 w n- - t ,. `pectively. These rooms can be rented separately together. On Friday and Saturday, the rooms will be opened up to accomodate 120 guests. Any licensed caterer may serve food in the Centrum, and the Centennial Lakes staff can provide a list of recommended caterers. Package prices for alcoholic beverages are available. The Maetzold Amphitheater at Centennial Lakes is a beautiful outdoor location for rent for your wedding. The amphitheater is open from May through October and stands in the same lakefront surroundings as the Centrum. Groups can also schedule games and tournaments on the park's putting greens and croquet and bowling lawns. Competitors can rent the nearby Centrum Building and order catering, or grab a bite at several close restaurants. The park staff can help organize your event. For more information, visit www.CentennialLakesPark.com or call the park's Special Events Coordinator, 952 - 832 -6789. Take the beauty of gardens, grottos and waterfalls and preserve it with the controlled climate of an indoor facility. The finished product would be the one -acre indoor Edinborough Park. In addition to the gardens and waterfalls, Edinborough Park's Great Hall provides an ideal spot for wedding receptions, company parties and proms. The Great Hall can accommodate 50 to 350 people, and is available Friday and Saturday evenings from mid -April through October. Edinborough Park welcomes any licensed caterer to serve food at your event and staff will provide a recommended caterer list to narrow your choices. Beverage service packages for alcoholic beverages are also available. Rental of the park also includes a 250 -seat amphitheatre complete with dressing rooms. The theater is designed with lighting and sound - perfect for ceremonies or presentations. For more information, visit www.EdinboroughtItrk.com or call the park's Special Events Coordinator, 952 - 832-6783. Reserve your child's next birthday party at Edinborough's Playpark! The birthday party package includes admission to the Playpark and reserved tables and chairs for three hours.We have six sites available and each site can accommodate up to 10 people. Up to four sites can be reserved.You must have a minimum of seven children. The maximum party size is 40. Rentals are available daily. A minimum of one adult per 10 children is required. The final guest count must be received at the Park Office 48 hours prior to the event. Helium balloons are not allowed. Parties may bring their own food and beverages, but cooking or warming of any type is prohibited. Parties without reservations are not guaranteed space. For more information or to make a reservation, call 952- 832-6790_ IN . • � . Edina residents and businesses can rent the Rosland Park Pavilion for picnics, retmions or other parties. The Pavilion, an outdoor gazebo with a capacity of 150 people, can be rented from May through October. Renters of the Pavilion will have direct access to Rosland Park's softball fields, tennis and volleyball courts, playground, fishing pier and view of Lake Cornelia. For more information, call the Park and Recreation Department, 952- 826 -0367. The City of Edina Park and Recreation Department also rents general park areas.The park areas are great for picnics and parties, or for competing on the softball fields and basketball, volleyball and tennis courts. While softball fields can be reserved, basketball, volleyball and tennis courts are available on a first -come, first -served basis only. Itsidents and commercial organizations can also use the ,.arks for photo shoots. No alcohol is allowed in the parks. For more information, call the Park and Recreation Department, 952 - 826 -0367. Edina Aquatic Center For wet - and -wild private parties, the Edina Aquatic Center is the place to splash around. Five - hundred people can fit in the Aquatic Center and rush down the water slides, fly clown the zip line or swim laps in the pool.The Edina Aquatic Center can only be rented after normal business hours, and alcohol is not permitted. For information, call -&V 952 - 826 -0431. For America's favorite pastime, there is no better place than Vain Valkenburg or Courtney fields. Courtney Fields has baseball diamonds complete with lights, and Van Valkenburg Fields is a complex with three lit softball fields. Whether competing in a single game or a tournament, Van Valkenburg and Courtney fields can accommodate everyone's diving catches and home runs. Van Valkenburg Fields also has an available concessions stand. For information on Van Valkenburg Fields, call 952 - 8264932. For information on Courtney Fields, call 952 - 82(}0431. The City of Edina tb:anks the following photographers whose work appears in this brochure: Bloom Photography, Lasting Moments Photography, Peterson Portraits. Polly Norman Photography and Stater Crosby. 0 • f�CORPOR��O • 1ago City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Phone: 952 - 927 -8861 www.CityofEditia.com Scot )U5 Arneson Acres Park has indoor and outdoor gathering spaces available.The facilities offer renters options for comfortable business meetings or outdoor barbecues. The Terrace Room is a 50 to 75 person indoor facility that can be set up with tables, or without tables to seat more people.The room can be rented by the hour or by the day, making it a convenient setting either for short meetings or all -day seminars and group events.A standard -size refrigerator and sink are available in the Terrace Room, but there are no cooking appliances. Renters may bring food or have it catered, and bringing wine and 3.2 percent beer is permitted as long as it does not leave the room. The Arneson Acres Gazebo is rented by the half -day or full day (anything over six hours). Renters can bring their own tables, chairs, grills and food to the Gazebo area for a personalized home -style cookout.The site is also ideal for small weddings.Tents and canopies can be used if they do not require stakes, but alcohol is not -mitted.The Gazebo fits approximately 25 people. Terrace Room and Gazebo can be rented together by the hour or for the day. For more information, call the Park and Recreation Department, 952- 826-0367. The Edina Senior Center is proud to share its new building with the public. The Senior Center has several competitively priced rooms of varying capacities that can be set up for meetings or classes.The rooms can be rented by the hour or the day, but there is a two-hour minimum for all rentals. The Senior Center also has special presentation equipment such as an overhead projector, television, VCR and DVD pl for an added fee, can use nucropnor extra cost.The cap; classrooms range fi people, and the Gr Room seats 100.T1 and Grandview Ro accessible 8 a.m. tc Monday through F( Sherwood Room, c with tables, is avail hours until the Edir Library closes each Saturday rentals are also available. For more information, call the Senior Center Manager, 952- 833 -9570. Who wouldn't want playgrounds and softbal their backyard? Now, everyone can have that at least temporarily. Fully enclosed and heat( shelters are found in four City parks and ser common needs of picnickers and business p seeking refuge from their cubicles. The shelt rented from March through November.The rented by the half -day or full day (anything hours). Alcohol is not permitted in the shelt The shelters at Todd and Walnut Ridge Parks capacities of approximately 50 people, and e Weber and Cornelia School parks fit 60 peol For more information, call the Park and Recreation Department, 952- 826-0367. Guidelines for Participation in Public Hearings* THE COUNCIL WISHES TO CREATE A POSITIVE ENVIRONMENT FOR ALL PUBLIC HEARINGS AND MEETINGS. YOUR COOPERATION WILL HELP CREATE THE BEST POSSIBLE ENVIRONMENT FOR EFFECTIVE PUBLIC DISCOURSE ON ISSUES. • You are encouraged to participate in the public hearing process. To assure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers should observe the following guidelines: o� anSilvidual speaker shoul emit their presentation to 5 minutes or less; o a speaker on behalf of a group should limit their presentation to 10 minutes or less. Note: The Mayor or the presiding officer will have the discretion to modify presentation times, as deemed necessary. • If you are going to speak: o present petitions, letters or printed material to the City Clerk prior to the beginning of your presentation; o when addressing the Council, stand at the podium and begin your presentation with your name and address; o direct your presentation to the Council and not a specific member or staff person; o try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers; o your comments should be limited to the matter under consideration; o you may possibly be allowed to speak a second time but not until everyone who wishes to speak has done so for the first time. • As a member of the audience at a public hearing: f , �G�II►�►l�1'/t1ti o you should avoid the use of signs, clapping, chee Lgor bo oing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication crg%te An-.H"jiFi nyi�� o you should not make comment during Council or Board deliberations unless requested by the Mayor or presiding officer for more information. Thank you for following the above guidelines. *To be included in the "Welcome to a Meeting of the Edina City Council' brochure. Commuter Challenge Roundtable HOW LOCAL EMPLOYERS PROMOTE COMMUTING OPTIONS Earth Day, April 22nd, 7:45 -9:30 a.m. WHY: Commuters want options, businesses want congestion relief. Be part of the solution and learn how easy it is to promote commuter alternatives. WHAT: This FREE breakfast event will allow you to learn how other employers promote the Commuter Challenge and other commuting programs. The Commuter Challenge is a campaign encouraging employ- ees to try an alternative such as busing, biking or carpooling and reward- ing them with the chance to win great prizes, including a 30 -inch flat - screen LCD TV, commuter bicycles, iPods, Bed & Breakfast packages, and more. WHERE: Best Buy Corporate Campus, 7601 Penn Avenue, Richfield. This location has a bus stop; please visit metrotransit.org to plan your trip. RSVP: by April 15th to 494 Commuter Services PHONE: 952 - 848 -4947 EMAIL: Melissa @494corridor.org Employer Panel and Topics: Starkey Labs - Carpooling Best Buy - Vanpooling Ramsey County - Busing Star Tribune - Bicycling Ceridian - Telecommuting Breakfast Sponsors LCM 1 I HIWAY YT FEDERAL _ CREDIT UMON i fKU7[R C1141 ENGf SET YQU fD v, ,t7Dl r N Presented by the Commuting Solution Partners: Metro Commuter Services Minneapolis TMO 494 Commuter Services Anoka County TMO Midway TMO Metro Transit St. Paul TMO