HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-04-05_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 5, 2005
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as
to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk
( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion.
There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so
requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal
sequence on the Agenda.
I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of March 15, 2005.
II. ADTOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
RECOGNITION OF TDM EFFORTS BY UNITED PROPERTIES AT CENTENNIAL LAKES
I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of March 1, and 15, 2005, and March S and March
14, and March 15, 2005, Special Meetings.
II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS Zoning Ordinances: First
Reading requires affirmative rollcall votes of three Council members except that a rezoning from
residential to non - residential requires four affirmative votes. Second Reading requires affirmative
rollcall votes of three of Council to pass except rezoning from residential to non - residential
requires four affirmative votes. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall votes of four
members of Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned
District: Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council members required passing. Conditional Use
Permit: Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council members required to pass. Variance Appeal:
Favorable rollcall of Council Members present to uphold or deny appeal
A. SET HEARING DATE - (09105)
1. Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance and Conditional Use Permit Final Approval.
Haugland Companies. 3901 -3907 West 500 Street and 5000 -5020 France Avenue South.
Retail and Residential Redevelopment.
2. Preliminary Plat Approval. The Blake School and City of Hopkins. West of Blake
Road/North of Belmore Lane.
3. Final Rezonine and Final Plat Approval. Mark Jones/Pukwana Townhomes LLC. 5125 49"
Street West. Townhouse Development
4. Conditional Use Permit. City of Edina and Independent School District 273. Edina
Community Center and Southview Campus. Generally located east of Hwy 100, west of
Concord Avenue and south of Southview Lane. Construction of Gyms.
5. Conditional Use Permit. Good Samaritan Church. 5730 Grove Street. Church Expansion
* B. LOT DIVISION - Party Wall Lot Division - 6016 -6020 Berne Circle
C. WALLINGFORD PROPERTIES
III. AWARD OF BID
* A. Kojetin Park Playground Equipment
* B. Jacobsen HR -9016 Rotary Mower - Park Maintenance Department
* C. 3/4 Ton Pick -Up Truck - Park Maintenance Department
* D. P90 Carbines, Ammunition and Accessories
Agenda /Edina City Council
April 5, 2005
Page 2
E. Commodities Purchase - Sand, Rock, Bituminous Materials, Concrete & Engine Oil, and
Water Treatment Chemicals
F. Valley View Road Lighting - Contract 05 -1, Improvement No. L42
IV. REPORTS/ RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Transportation Commission Traffic Policy
B. Resolution No. 2005 -23 Approving Appointing Cheryl L. Engelman and Gordon Hughes as
Agents of the Community Health Board
C. Boards, Commissions and Committees Term Limits
D. Public Hearing Guidelines
E. 40TH Annual Braemar Inspection Tour (7/12/05)
F. Ikasu Sushi Bar and Lounge - On -Sale and Sunday Sale Intoxicating Liquor Licenses
G. Ikasu Sushi Bar and Lounge - Dance Permit
H. Replacement Wetlands Declaration - Braemar Golf Course 17th Tee
I. Resolution No. 2005 -25 Receiving Feasibility Reports: Roadway Improvement Projects: A-
216, Schaefer Road; No. A -217, Schaefer Circle; No. BA -328, West 58th Street
J. Resolution No. 2005 -26 Setting Hearing Date (5/03/05) - Neighborhood Roadway
Improvement Projects: No. BA -312, Bridge Lane & Townes Road, and No. BA -329, Shannon
Drive
V. FINANCE
A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per Pre -List dated March 16, 2005,
TOTAL $577,629.78, and March 23, 2005, $1,652,942.25; March 30, 2005, $757,361.78.
B. PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -24 - Issue of Revenue Bonds by City of
Minneapolis on Behalf of Fairview Health Services
VI. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS
VII. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
VIII. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
IX. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
X. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEM
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
Mon
Apr 11
Board of Appeal and Equalization
5:00 P.M.
Thur
Apr 14
Volunteer Recognition Reception
5:00 P.M.
Tues
Apr 19
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
Mon
Apr 25
Continuation Date Board of Appeals
5:00 P.M.
Tues
May 3
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
Tues
May 17
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
Mon
May 30
MEMORIAL DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Offices Closed
Tues
Jun 7
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
Tues
June 21
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
Thur
June 23
Employee Recognition Luncheon
11:00 A.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
BRAEMAR CLLUBHOUSE
U
e
Cn
•lam �•
�!%PBOe
REPORURECOMMENDATION
To:
MAYOR AND COUNCIL
Agenda Item
From:
GORDON L. HUGHES'
Consent
El
CITY MANAGER
Information Only
❑
Date:
APRIL 5, 2005
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
®
To Council
Subject:
FUND-RAISING PROPOSAL
❑
Motion
FOR EDINA PUBLIC ART
El
Resolution
COMMITTEE
❑
Ordinance
Discussion
REPORT:
Attached is a'proposal from the Edina Public Art Committee which„ will be
discussed at the 5:30 PM workshop.
U
i
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL
OF STAINED GLASS PUBLIC
ART PROJECT FOR CITY HALL
In December 2004, the Edina City Council approved the Edina Public Art Committee's request for $25,000 in
2005 for public art projects. The Committee unanimously recommends that the City Council accept the
following proposal for stained glass art panels in the new City Hall.
Edina prides itself on its reputation of being a premier city whose residents value a love of culture and the arts.
It is the vision of the Edina Public Art Committee to honor the heritage of Edina via stained glass panels that
depict Minnehaha Creek and the historic 1857 mill site. The City Hall, the most public of all Edina community
spaces, is an appropriate venue for such a project. The "mill that gave birth to a city" uniquely represents Edina
and its transformation from a small milling settlement to a preeminent residential and business community.
This project benefits the community in several ways:
-it creates a warm and welcoming focal point for all visitors to City Hall
-it serves as an educational tool for all ages by bringing the history of Edina to life with a visual representation
of our city's roots
-it builds pride in community heritage and enhances the quality of life through artistic expression and reflection
-it encourages cooperation between public and private sectors, city government, and the arts community
A successful precedent has been set by the city of Vadnais Heights, which undertook a similar glass project in
2001 to embellish its new city hall, also designed by architect David Kroos.
STRATEGY
The Edina Public Art Committee has developed "Request for Qualification" (RFQ) materials to be posted on
the city's web site and mailed to all area glass artists.
(Please refer to attached RFQ). Three finalists will be selected from the applicants and invited to submit
specific proposals to the Committee. A stipend of $500 will be paid to each finalist. The Public Art Committee
will present its final choice of artist and proposal to the City Council for approval.
FUNDING
A portion of the $25,000 allocated by the city in 2005 for public art will be utilized and augmented by private
and corporate donations to meet the Committee's $75,000 funding goal. The Edina Community Foundation
serves as the fiduciary agent. Installation of the glass project is targeted for late 2006.
Respectfully submitted,
The Edina Public Art Committee
Tuesday, April 5, 2005 Workshop
and the
Edina Public Art Committee
at City Hall in the Community Room
5:30- 6:00pm
Brief PowerPoint presentation -
What is Public Art?
What could Public Art be?
Why Public Art? Discussion.
6:00- 6:45pm
Linda Kieffer, EPAC Chair
Presentation
The Glass Project at City Hall
I it ility Bill Funding Idea
Discussion.
Included in this packet:
• Overview of Public Art
• Update on EPAC activities
• Artscape brochure
• City Hall Art Guide
• Call for Artists pamphlet
• Utility Funding Proposal
• Roster of EPAC Members
Note:
For Ann Swenson and Alice Hulbert
Complete packet with original
July 2004 information.
If you need additional information before Tuesday's
meeting, please contact Diana at 612 -915 -6603,
page 612 -579 -6124 or 952 -920 -5856 (home).
Public Art can create identity and celebrate public spaces.
Do Ro� �$ERSL
F CgA
Public Art can reflect and
honor the history of a
community.
The EPAC is continuing to
study our neighbors' Public Art.
This sculpture is entitled
Allegory of Excelsior
(Paid for entirely by the City of St.
Louis Park- $175,000 plus
installation costs.)
Packet information created in the Peggy Kelly
Media Studios at the Edina Art Center
Overview of Public Art in Minnesota Cities
(Population < 80,0000)
Public art projects and programs are flourishing in the metropolitan area and outlying
communities. Aside from enhancing aesthetics and quality of life, reflecting community
identity, and educating the public, the non -profit arts strengthen the economic
development of downtowns, small towns, and neighborhoods across the state. The
estimated economic impact of Minnesota non - profit arts organizations is nearly one
billion dollars per year (McKnight Foundation, 1996).
Metropolitan Suburbs involved with Public Art Projects: Outstate:
Apple Valley
Duluth
Bloomington
Elk River
Burnsville
St. Cloud
Chaska
Shafer
Eagan
Eden Prairie
Hopkins
Maplewood
Plymouth
Richfield
Vadnais Heights
The scope of these projects runs the gamut from decorative sidewalk pavers and railings,
plaza mosaics, single foyer sculptures, and stained glass window panels, to multi -acre
sculpture gardens. Sources of funding are as varied as the pieces themselves and have
included city government, developers, community foundations, and corporate and
individual donors.
The Edina Public Art Committee believes that public art projects in Edina unequivocally
support the mission statement of our community:
The mission of the City of Edina is to provide effective and valued public services,
maintain a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities and guide the
development of lands within the City all in a manner which sustains and improves the
uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses.
Update on Edina Public Art Committee Activities since July, 2004
Completed:
Publication of Artscape brochure
Display of permanent and rotating pieces in City Hall departmental lobbies and
employees' offices
Publication of Edina City Hall Art Guide
Display of historic Edina Police photos in Police Department
Display of artistic bench in City Hall lobby area (piece on loan)
Marketing of Public Art Committee's vision and planned projects:
-letter and Artscape brochure sent to all Edina resident EAC members (400)
- inclusion of Artscape in annual Community Foundation mailing (5500)
- article about Edina Public Art Committee in About Town and City Slick
- article about Committee and city funding request in Edina Sun Current
Visit to Vadnais Heights City Hall to view stained glass, mosaics, and tapestry
Draft of Request for Qualifications brochure to glass artists for City Hall Art Glass
Project
Draft of utility bill funding proposal
In Process:
Framing and display of Art Dickey photographs for permanent exhibit in 2 "d floor
corridor adjacent to Community Room
Crosstown Camera Club rotating exhibit of photographs in Community Room
Artistic pedestals for three dimensional visual display and signage outside of each City
Hall departmental office
Edina Public Art Committee logo for decals and refrigerator magnets
Planning of fund- raising gala/special. event
Future Projects:.
Sculptures for Grandview Square Park
Edina Public Art
Committee
The residents of Edina enjoy an
exceptionally high quality of life, a
strong sense of community and a
love of culture and the Arts.
The Edina Public Art Committee is
comprised of residents and repre-
sentatives from the Art Center,
City staff and the City Council. The
purpose of the committee is to ad-
vise the City with regard to all mat-
ters pertaining to public visual arts
within the City.
Linda Kieffer, Chair
Bradley Benn, Kristen Christianson,
Dick Crockett, Diana Hedges,
Betty Hemstod, Linda Masica,
Kay Wetherall
Ex- Officio and Advisors:
Bill Baxley, Gordon Hughes,
John Keprios
Browndale Bridge, Watercolor by Patti Jeub
Donations to, ,ake it possible to purchase
art for the Citi3 may be made to t he
Edina Community Foundation
5280 Grandview Square
Edina MN 55436
For information contact
Edina Art Center
4701 West 64th Street
Edina MN 55435
Phone: 612 -915 -6600
Fax: 612 -915 -6601
www.EdinaArtCenter.com
�,/^�r
�o e 2
� a
Edina
Citig Hall
Art Guide
Thunder of Light, Oil, Richard Kochenash
Rotatin6 Exhibitions
and works in the
Permanent Collection
..T
Guide to Artwork Currently in City Hall
First Floor
In the Lobby:
PLANTERS (also on Second Floor)
PC*
Ceramics by Adama Sow, EAC faculty
LIFETOUCH BENCH
NFS
Sculpture by Nicolas Legeros & Heidi Hoy
TRANQUILITY (by the drinking fountain)
PC **
Color Photo by Arlene Green, Edina Resident
Park and Recreation:
EDINA PARK SCENES
PC*
Color Photos by Crosby Slater
Assessing:
ICE SKATERS
$950
Acrylic by David Rickert, EAC faculty
LIGHTHOUSE, Byron Bay, Australia
$650
SEASHORE, Byron Bay, Australia
$650
Oils by Linda Kieffer, Edina Art Center Board
Planning:
PORTRAIT H $665
Collage by Cynthia Stan kweather- Nelson EAC collection
UNTITLED $1800
Mixed media by Steve Hartman EAC collection
WHICH (Partial Memory) $2200
Ltd Ed Print by Steven Sorman EAC collection
All artwork is for sale except Permanent Collection.
A portion of the proceeds supports the Edina Art Center.
PC* = Permanent Collection
PC * *= Xcel Energy purchase award 2004
For more information or to purchase art
call the Edina Art Center, 612 - 915 -6600
Building Inspections:
EL DORADO
Watercolor by Fred Dingler, EAC instructor
MONET'S GARDEN
Watercolor/Pastel by Clara Saprasa, EAC member
LAST SNOW— FIRST SWIM
MEANDERING MINNEHAHA
LEAVING IN THE MORNING
Color photos by Betty Hemstad, Edina resident
Second Floor
Administration:
EDINBOROUGHPARK
50`h & FRANCE
Watercolors by Doug Lew, EAC faculty
NORTHWOODS MOON (in Cahill conf. room)
Pastel by J Thomas Nelson
Utilities and Finance:
MINNEHAHA CREEK
Oil by Paul Abdella, EAC faculty
MEANDERING CLOUDS
MINNEHAHA CREEK IN MAY
VRBANJEWEL
Oils by Linda Kieffer, EAC board
ROCK DANCE (in conference room)
Gelatin Silver Print by Polly Norman, Edina Res.
$450
$300
$225
$225
$225
PC*
PC*
$180
$2300
$600
$350
PC **
PC **
Community Room:
Soon the site of rotating exhibitions by the Crosstown Camera Club
HIDDEN BAY $240
RIPPLES $280
PINE ISLAND $280
Pastels by J Thomas Nelson, EAC emeritus
Hall by the Community Room:
Soon the site of the permanent Art Dickey memorial exhibition
Project Description
The project is in the Edina City Hall at
4801 West 50th Street. It involves two
large, two -story exterior window areas
which comprise the front entrance of the
main foyer (western exposure, 34 ft x 24 ft)
and the wall on the opposite end of the
lobby (eastern exposure, 10 ft. x 27 ft.)
Imagery may be abstract or representa-
tional and relate to the theme of Minnehaha
Creek and the historic mill site.
(information about the original mill and
historic photos will be available for final-
ists' reference)
• We encourage all forms of creative ex-
pression.
• Both window spaces should be consid-
ered as a unified whole and appeal to
all ages.
• Lighting is available to illuminate the
panels.
• Any form of art glass may be used.
• The finished product must be durable
and require little or no maintenance.
• Only a portion of the 1000 square feet
is expected to be covered.
RFQ (Request for Qualifica-
tions) Requirements
Please submit:
1. Up to 10 full color examples (printed
copies) of recent work or related pro-
jects
2. A correspondence list of work includ-
ing title, media, dimensions, and date
3. Current resume with at least three ref-
erences
Send all responses to:
Linda Kieffer, Chair
Edina Public Art Committee
c/o The Edina Community Foundation
5280 Grandview Square
Edina, MN 55436
All submissions must be postmarked by July
31, 2004. Questions may be directed to
Diana Hedges at the Edina Art Center, 612-
915 -6603.
•a 41r, ->I
Call for Artists
Eligibility and Selection Crite-
ria
Glass artists from the metropolitan area and
outstate Minnesota are invited to submit in-
troductory materials (see Request for Quali-
fications (RFQ) Requirements section on
back of flyer). Edina residents are encour-
aged to apply.
THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR Technical quality of work examples, artists'
TIME AND EFFORTS! WE APPRECI- experience, creativity, and ability, and com-
ATE YOUR TALENTS AND INTEREST patibility with the vision of the Edina Public
IN OUR COMMUNITY Art-Committee will all be considered in the
THE EDINA PUBLIC ART COMMITTEE
selection process.
Background
The city of Edina has always recognized the
significance of its past while actively preparing
for the future. From its incorporation in 1888
as a milling community on the banks of the
Minnehaha Creek, Edina has evolved into a
preeminent place for living, learning, raising
families, and conducting business. Residents
value a strong sense of community identity, an
exceptionally high quality of life, and recog-
nize the importance of art in enriching every-
day experiences. In this spirit, the Edina Pub-
lic Art Committee was convened in 2004 to
enhance the beauty of Edina's public spaces
with two and three dimensional art.
It is the vision of the Committee to depict and
honor Edina's mill heritage with permanent art
glass panels to be installed within the existing
windows of the new City Hall. The panels
should create an engaging and dramatic focal
point for all who enter the building. Large,
two -story windows which flank the east and
west sides of the main foyer comprise the pro-
ject area.
The Edina Public Art Committee has requested
and received funding from the City in the 2005
budget cycle to jumpstart this project. Addi-
tional monies will come from private and cor-
porate donors to meet our goal.
Artist Selectio
The artist selection process will consist of
three stages:
STAGE ONE
A panel comprised of the Edina Public Art
Committee, a City Hall employee, and com-
munity volunteers will review all submis-
sions. Upon initial review, up to three final-
ists will be selected and interviewed.
STAGE TWO
Each finalist will be invited to prepare a
complete design proposal to include a model
and/or drawings for presentation to the panel
during the initial interview. A $500 stipend
will be awarded for the designs prepared.
STAGE THREE
The panel will make the final selection and
present to the Edina City Council for final
approval prior to notifying the selected artist.
Project Timeline*
June 2005 - -- Announcement of project,
mailing of RFQ to area glass artists
July 31 - - -- Postmark deadline for submis-
sion of RFQ materials
August 15 - -- Applicants notified of status
Sept. 1 - - -- Informational meeting with fi-
nalists
Nov. 1 - - -- Finalists present specific pro-
posals to Public Art Committee
Nov. 15 - -- Public Art Committee submits
its choice of finalist to City Council for ap-
proval
Dec. 1 - - -- Commission awarded
Jan. 2006 -- Contracts with participants
signed
Nov. 2006 —Final installation of project
*Dates are tentative
• Secured a gift of 12 defibrillators from
Fairview Southdale Hospital for the
Edina Police Department.
• Made grants to the Edina Senior Center.
• Defined support of youth services as one
of its focus areas by making grants to the
Connecting With Kids initiative and the
Edina Park and Recreation Department
to ensure that low- income families and
children would be able to use the Edina
Art Center, Aquatic Center and other
park facilities.
0
O
O
I
ARTs%r-'APE
The Edina
Community Foundation is
currently raising funds
for art and plantings for
the new Edina City Hall.
c,� CU1j
�� • • 2
l
J r
� N
a
The Edina Community Foundation has
helped fund many other City of Edina
Z
projects in recent years, including:
'J' a
w �
S
.-•
• Purchased thermal imaging equipment
ON C
for the Edina Fire Department. 1'
O
�
�
O
• Helped the Edina Art Center acquire a
w
kiln for firing pottery.
• Assisted with funding for a new K -9 Unit
for the Edina Police.
• Helped an individual make a major
contribution to the new South Metro
Public Safety Training Facility and served
as the funding vehicle for a group of
neighbors to contribute the funds
necessary to complete Fox Meadow Park.
• Secured a gift of 12 defibrillators from
Fairview Southdale Hospital for the
Edina Police Department.
• Made grants to the Edina Senior Center.
• Defined support of youth services as one
of its focus areas by making grants to the
Connecting With Kids initiative and the
Edina Park and Recreation Department
to ensure that low- income families and
children would be able to use the Edina
Art Center, Aquatic Center and other
park facilities.
0
O
O
I
ARTs%r-'APE
The Edina
Community Foundation is
currently raising funds
for art and plantings for
the new Edina City Hall.
c,� CU1j
�� • • 2
l
J r
Integrate
public
fine art into
spaces.
Build awareness and pride in community heritage
and neighborhood identity.
Encourage public interaction with an enjoyment
of public places.
0 0
Provide opportunities for citizens,
neighborhoods and groups to Work together.
.
Nurture the Creative
environment in Edina and encourage
local artiStlC endeavors.
To meet these goals`and reflect the pride
of living in Edina, the-Edina--Community---
Foundation is currently raising funds for
public art and plantings for the new Edina
City Hall.
The Foundation is working with a group of
residents to raise at least $100,000 for public
art for the new Edina City Hall.
The art will be installed in phases as money
is raised. Projects envisioned include:
OUTDOORS /
An outdoor sculpture to create a welcoming
space for people to gather. Construction of
City Hall included -a basic landscape plan, but
additional - seasonal plantings and amenities
are-also needed to make the property stand
out as a gateway to the community.
CORRIDORS
Pedestals for displaying small sculptures and
pottery at the entrances to each City Hall
department. In addition to displaying fine
art, the pedestals would serve as a way to
identifythe Administration, Assessing,
Building Inspections, Engineering, Finance &
Health, Park & Recreation, Planning
and Police department office suites.
In addition, the city's horticulturists have
designed an interior plantscape to further
beautify the building.
OTHER PUBLIC AREAS
Two -story fabric or stained glass panels to
hang in the entrance of the new City Hall and
various pieces of framed artwork for the public
areas of the building.
YES!
I'd like to make a tax- deductible
contribution to the City Hall Art Fund. =
Please make checks payable-fo the Edina
Community Foundation. Indicate in your
check's memo - section that your contribution
is for City-Hall art.
Please deliver in person or mail
your checks to:
Edina Community Foundation
5280 Grandview Square
Edina, MN- -55436
- -or
Edina City Hall
4801 W. 50th St.
Edina, MN 55424
1MMA 10
ADDRESS
CITY
STATE
ZIP
For more information, call the Edina
Community Foundation, 952 - 833 -9573
Utility Bill Public Art Funding Proposal
Funding for public art can come from a variety of sources; local government, public
agencies, percent -for -art programs, individuals, corporations, and private foundations.
Ideally the process of fund- raising should be simple, easy, accessible, cost efficient, and
generally as painless as possible for all those involved.
The Edina Public Art Committee unanimously recommends to the City Council either of
two voluntary plans for accruing funds for public art via the Edina utility bill:
$1 "check -off " for the Arts
Include a $1.00 "check -off' for public art projects in the Account Summary of the bill.
This could be done with each billing or have residents enroll for one year in a plan, which
automatically adds $1.00 to the bill. (Avoids the problem of people forgetting to check or
losing interest in the plan). With a hypothetical 20% participation rate, this plan would
generate $4.00 /yr/household or approximately $16,800 /yr (20% of 21,000 households x
$4)
Or
Round -up for the Arts
l;: With this plan the utility bill is rounded up to the nearest whole dollar amount; the
resulting "change" is then donated to public art. The city of St. Cloud (population
58,000) has been using this type of program successfully since 2001 and has raised over
$17,000 for public art projects (participation rate = 11 %) With Edina's quarterly bill, the
average donation/yr would be approximately $2.00 /participating household.
Enrollment in either of these plans can be accomplished conveniently in a variety of
ways:
- Online enrollment via the city's web site (www.ci.edina.mn.us)
- Enrollment cards mailed with the utility bill
-Phone enrollment by calling the Utility Bill Division of City Hall (952 -927-
8861)
Each of these plans has the advantages of being totally VOLUNTARY and EASY to
execute with MINIMAL COST after the initial set -up is completed.
EDINA PUBLIC ART COMMITTEE ROSTER
L " "inda'Kieffer, Chair . all.kieffergatt.net (952)942 -7415
6809 Saint Patrick's Lane
Edina MN 55439 -1632
rad_Benn BBenngci.edina.mn.us (612)915 -6604
Edina Art Center home 952- 922 -2280
4701 W. 64`h St.
Edina MN 55435
Kris ten_Christianson KBCREALTORgyahoo.com
3622 County Rd 101 S. (952) 920 -6594 (H), (612) 616 -8591 (C)
Wayzata MN 55391
Dick Crockett dcrockettng,mn.rr.com (952) 833 -9573
Edina Community Foundation
5280 Grand view Square
Edina MN 55436
_iana Hedges . DHedg_eskci.edina.mn.us (612)915 -6603
Edina Art Center pager 612 -579 -6124
4701 W. 64`h St.
Edina MN 55435
�Betty`Hemstad- RandBHemstadgaol.com (952) 922 -2690
4350 Brookside Ct
Edina MN 55436
Linda_Masica - lmmasicagaol.com (952) 942 -6770
6817 Valley View Rd
Edina MN 55439 -1647
thleen -(Kay) W— etherall KathWethgcg.net (9 52) 920 -6594
4350 Brookside Ct.
Edina MN 55436
feat Greer WFGreer@aol.com 952- 941 -4086
7125Schey Drive
Edina MN 55439
MINUTES
OF THE
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
HELD AT CITY HALL
MARCH 15, 2005
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson and
Chair Hovland.
CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Masica and seconded
by Commissioner Housh approving the Consent Agenda for the Edina Housing and
Redevelopment Authority as presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR MARCH 1, 2005, APPROVED Motion made by
Commissioner Masica and seconded by Commissioner Housh approving the Minutes of the
regular meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for March 1, 2005.
Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes.
There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda,
Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned.
Executive Director
O
`\ -.
-NA.
City of Edina
Certificate ofAcFiievement
'resented to VnitedProperties at
Centennial'Lakes Office dark
The City of Edina commends United Properties for its exceptional commitment to
reducing traffic congestion by promoting commuting alternatives.
James Hovland, Mayor
Gordon Hughes, City Manager
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT CITY HALL
MARCH 1, 2005
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson and Mayor
Hovland.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by
Member Housh approving the Council Consent Agenda as presented with the exception of
approval of the Regular Meeting Minutes of February 15, 2005.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
PROCLAMATION PRESENTED - "A PERFECT SHOW" Mayor Hovland noted that the Adaptive
Recreation & Learning Exchange (AR &LE) offers opportunities for individuals with disabilities to
actively participate in recreation, leisure and Community Education in Bloomington, Eden Prairie,
Edina and Richfield. More than forty actors in the play were adults with physical or developmental
disabilities and the goal was to provide an opportunity to participate in a theatrical production. He
proclaimed Saturday, March 12, 2005, as a Day for the presentation of a musical, 'A PERFECT
SHOW ", in Edina.
MICHEL REVIEWED MINNESOTA MOVES AND INVITED ALL TO TOWN MEETING -
Senator Geoff Michel explained the Minnesota Moves initiative in front of the legislature. He also
invited the Council and citizens of Edina to attend the Legislators Town Meeting scheduled for 7:00
p.m. March 8, 2005 in the Edina City Council Chambers.
*MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETINGS OF FEBRUARY 15, 16,18, AND 24, 2005, APPROVED
Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh, approving the Special Meeting
Minutes of February 15,16,18, and 24, 2005.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 15, 2005, APPROVED AS AMENDED
Member Swenson asked removal of the Minutes of the February 15, 2005, meeting from the Consent
Agenda for an amendment to her comments. Mayor Hovland added an addition to the Minutes and
asked that they be re- submitted for approval at the next Council meeting.
No formal Council action was taken.
ACTION CONTINUED ON TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION POLICY UNTIL APRIL 5, 2005
Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered place on file.
Fred Richards, Transportation Commission Chair, stated the Commission has spent the last twelve to
fourteen months developing the framework contained in the Transportation Commission Policy. He
reported the draft policy was adopted by the Commission on a six to one vote and noted the
Commission in his opinion represented a cross section of Edina's population not only geographically
but also demographically. He pointed out the policy was the toolbox needed to allow the Commission
Page 1
Y
Minutes/Edina Cif Council/March 1, 2005
a chance to work through some of the traffic issues facing Edina.. Mr. Richards stated the Commission
recommended the Council consider adoption of the draft policy.
Assistant Engineer. Lillehaug reviewed the draft Edina Transportation Commission Policy. He stated
that in response to the traffic congestion problem the Council formed the Local Traffic Task Force to
analyze traffic on local roadways in 2002 - 2003. Mr. Lillehaug said that one of the Local Traffic Task
Force recommendations was to establish a committee to develop a framework to address the traffic
problem.. Mr. Lillehaug reported the Council adopted an ordinance in December 2004 establishing
the Transportation Commission. He quoted Edina Code Section 1225 which laid out the
Commission's purpose and duties as follows:
"1225.02 Purpose and Duties.. The Commission shall:
A. Advise the Council on matters relating to the operation of the local street system with
respect to traffic volumes, congestion, and functional classification, but not maintenance
activities, of the City.
B. Review. and comment on plans to enhance mass transit opportunities in the City.
C. Review the findings of the Local Traffic Task Force and offer recommendations for
implementation.
D. Evaluate methods for traffic calming and other speed and volume mitigation measures
and recommend their implementation where appropriate. ".
Mr. Lillehaug stated the draft Transportation Policy included the following:
• A framework to address traffic issues in Edina
• Community standards and criteria to ensure process was objective
He added that beyond developing the Policy, the Commissions duty would be to recommend
measures :to the Council to address specific traffic issues in Edina.
Mr. Lillehaug reported the Transportation Commission had taken the following steps in developing
the policy.
• At the direction of the Commission, staff began drafting the policy - April 2004
• Several iterations of review and revisions by the ETC occurred over the period of May 2004 to
Jan 2005
• The ETC formally recommended the DRAFT on October. 28, 2004 to receive public comment
• Dec. 9, 2004 - held public house on draft policy
• Jan. 6, 2005 the Final Draft of the Policy was recommended by the ETC for Council
consideration
Joni Kelly. Bennett, 4003 Lynn Avenue, Transportation Commission member, filed a minority report.
Ms. Bennett elaborated on the following points from her report:
• The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) Policy was developed without knowledge of or
attempt to assess community concerns and priorities.
• The ETC Policy was developed without knowledge or attempt to assess how existing Edina
Transportation Policy was or was not serving the City.
• The ETC Policy conflicts with the Edina Transportation Plan and City of Edina Vision 20/20.
• The ETC Policy fails to acknowledge the regional, national and international shift away from
use of traffic calming for volume control toward use of traffic calming for speed control.
• The ETC Policy fails to acknowledge the negative impacts of traffic calming on public safety.
• The ETC Policy fails to acknowledge or protect the rights and interests of Edina residents who
would be affected by traffic calming.
• . The ETC Policy Neighborhood Traffic Management Program requires notice to too small a
geographic area or group or residents.
Page 2
Minutes/Edina City Council/March 1, 2005
• Measurement of traffic problems, public concern, and public approval of proposed solutions
was too subjective.
• The amount of agreement required advancing a study or test installation was completely
inadequate.
• The ETC Policy fails to inform the public adequately about functional street classification and
the appropriate use of roadways.
• The ETC Policy fails to recognize that traffic calming was no substitute for adequate City
planning.
Public Comment
Robert Webb, 4516 Drexel Avenue, read a statement supporting the adoption of the proposed draft
policy. Mr. Webb urged the Council to honor the work of the Transportation Commission by .
adopting the draft plan and allowing the Commission to get on with their work.
Jonathan Gross, 4208 Grimes Avenue, stated his objection to the policy. He reviewed his
understanding of the purpose of the policy and stated the proposed draft policy did not meet the
goals.
Ron Williamson, 4300 Eton Place, suggested six minor changes to the proposed draft policy in
writing. He urged the Council to be cautious to not pit neighbor against neighbor when
implementing the policy.
Kittie O'Dea, 4610 Bruce Avenue, stated the Transportation Policy was needed to deal with increased
concerns about safety, not driver convenience. Ms. O'Dea submitted nine written questions and
urged adoption of the policy.
Marie Thorpe, 4506 Edina Boulevard, Transportation Commission member, commented it should be
remembered that Commissioner Bennett's report was a minority report from one member of the
Commission. She noted the Transportation Commission represented the majority viewpoint of the
other six members of the Commission. Ms. Thorpe added the Commission consulted many resources
while developing the policy and followed a process similar to other commissions.
Maria Fesenmaier, 5713 Concord Avenue, representing the Edina Community Center Neighborhood
Association, commended the efforts of the Commission and offered her suggestions for
improvements to the draft policy.
Jennifer Janovy, 4016 Inglewood, stated she had served on the Traffic Task Force. Ms Janovy asked
what would take precedence when the proposed draft policy conflicted with the Comprehensive
Transportation Plan. Ms. Janovy urged the Council to listen to the minority report and not adopt the
draft plan without significant revision.
Angela Berger, 4809 West 60th Street, stated she was a new Edina resident formerly of Minneapolis
and she feared pitting neighborhood against neighborhood. She urged the Council to not draft a
policy that would create this dilemma.
Andrea Hoppmann, 4324 Coolridge Avenue, St. Louis Park, stated she, lived in the Browndale
Neighborhood and expressed concern about the proposed policy notification area. She stated that she
hoped to be notified of any traffic measures that would affect her neighborhood.
Page 3
Minutes/Edina City Council/March 1, 2005
Elaine Bonn, 4382 Thielen Avenue, stated the traffic has increased greatly over the years. Ms. Bonn
said she thought the proposed policy was a dichotomy of the minds. She felt the notice area should
be expanded.
Robert Knudson, 4375 Browndale, St. Louis Park, asked that his neighborhood be notified of any
traffic calming affecting his neighborhood.
Kelsey Smith, 4801 West 44th Street, stated that he believed that too few people could steer a
neighborhood program, he had concerns with the proposed notification area and much concern about
closure of streets.
Council Discussion/ Action
Member Housh asked Chair Richards to comment on the concerns expressed over the proposed
notification area in the draft policy.
Chair Richards stated he felt people were rushing to judgment about the notice area.. He said the
Transportation Commission had considered several possibilities, but felt that the issue before the
Commission would drive the area of notice. Far reaching issues would require notices to many more
than a simple issue.. He added that in his opinion the City has typically notified more people than
necessary rather than fewer. Mr. Richards continued stating that he believed people have been heard
and that was really all that could be asked of government. The decision' when it has been made may
not go the way the evening's speakers wished, but they have had the opportunity to. speak. He urged
keeping a citywide perspective when considering the draft policy. Further, Mr. Richards suggested
that if the Council did not accept the work of the Transportation Commission perhaps they should
seat a different set of Commissioners to redo that work.
Member Swenson asked if Chair Richards viewed speed and volume control notification as different.
Mr. Richards replied he felt the City would err on a broader notification area, but that in his opinion
volume control would have a broader impact.
Member Masica commented that she felt a critical piece was missing and that was who would be
reviewing new development/ redevelopment. Mr. Richards replied that the Planning Commission
has worked well for many. years and that the Transportation Commission would also review traffic
on development/ redevelopment requiring their attention when the level of the
development/ redevelopment triggered a review.
Member Housh made a motion to close the public hearing. Member Swenson seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland '
Motion carried.
Member Housh stated that he felt traffic to be the most contentious issue since he has been elected to
Council. He stated he hated to see neighborhoods become the Hatfields and McCoys feuding over
who has more needs. Member Housh suggested the Council consider adopting the proposed policy
as drafted for a trial period. He added he felt it would be incorrect to not move ahead and let the
Transportation Commission get on with their work. Member Housh made a motion to adopt the
policy for a trial period of two years during which time no Neighborhood Traffic Management
Plans would be looked at for either the Morningside or Country Club neighborhoods. Member
Swenson seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Swenson
Nays: Hulbert, Masica, Hovland
Motion failed.
Page 4
Y
Minutes/Edina City Council/March 1, 2005
Member Swenson suggested that the definition of cut- through traffic should match in the draft policy
and the Vision 20/20 document. She noted the traffic was a regional issue pointing out Bob O'Brien
had just informed the Council vehicle registration had increased over twenty-four percent in ten
years.
Member Hulbert stated she believed the policy should be reviewed and adopted when it was the best
product possible. She suggested amending any divisive items at this time.
Member Masica suggested the neighborhood frustration might be due to an unsolvable situation
created by the regional traffic congestion.. However she agreed that there should be some review and
tweaking of the draft policy. She expressed concern that perhaps the notification area needed to be
different.
Mayor Hovland thanked all the collaborators and agreed .the draft plan should be the best product
possible. He said'he felt the policy was very close to the end product, but suggested taking some final
written comments and postponing Council action until they could review the written comments and
perhaps make some minor adjustments to the draft policy. This would allow the Council time to
think more about the notice areas and other divisive components of the policy. Mayor Hovland
stated he felt when the Council adopted the final plan no neighborhoods should be excluded from
participation.
Member Housh stated he felt this was not the best route to follow and that the Council should take
action on the proposed plan and allow the Transportation Commission to get on with their work.
Mayor Hovland made a motion to continue action on the proposed Draft Transportation
Commission Policy until April 5, 2005, scheduling a special meeting to discuss potential revisions
for 5:00 p.m. on March 8, 2005 and to receive written comments on the draft policy until 4:30 p.m.
on March 8, 2005. Member Masica seconded the motion.
Ayes: Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Nay: Housh
Motion carried.
*HEARING DATE SET OF MARCH 15, 2005, FOR AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE
AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - HAUGLAND COMPANIES (3901 - 3907 50TH STREET
WEST AND 5000 - 5020 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH) Motion made by Member Masica and
seconded by Member Housh setting the hearing date of March 15, 2005, for an Amendment to the
Zoning Ordinance and Conditional Use Permit for Haugland Companies, 3901 - 3907 50th Street
West and 5000 - 5020 France Avenue South.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
* RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -18 APPROVING A LOT DIVISION FOR 6920 HILLSIDE LANE AND
5524 WEST 70TH STREET Member Masica introduced the following resolution and seconded by
Member Housh and moved its approval:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-18
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A LOT DIVISION FOR
6920 HILLSIDE LANE AND
5524 WEST 70TH STREET
WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land constitute two separate parcels:
Lot 19, Block 6, LA BUENA VISTA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA, according to the
recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Page S
Minutes/Edina City Council/March 1, 2005
AND
Lot 18, Block 6, LA BUENA VISTA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA, according to the
recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the owners of the described land desire to subdivide and combine said tracts in
to the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "parcels ") described as follows:
PARCEL A:
Lot 19, Block 6, LA BUENA VISTA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA, according to the
recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Except that part of the southerly 5.00 feet of
the said Lot 19 lying the northerly extension of the east line of Lot 18, said Block 6.
PARCEL B: ere t
Lot 18, Block 6, LA BUENA VISTA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA, according to the
recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. eav4e-r
Together with the southerly 5.00 feet of the Lot 19, said Block 6, lying wes#ertp the
northerly extension of the east line of said Lot 18. I
WHEREAS, the requested subdivision is authorized under Code Section 810 and it has
been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of
Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said newly created Parcels as separate tracts of land
do not interfere with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the Edina City Code
Sections 810 and 850;
NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, that the
conveyance and ownership of the above described tracts of land (PARCEL A and PARCEL B) as
separate tracts of land are hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Code Sections
850 and 81- are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of
land but only to the extent permitted under Code Sections 810 and 850 subject to the limitations set
out in Code Section 850 and said Ordinances are now waived for any other purpose or as to any
other provisions thereof, and further subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision
be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent Ordinances of the City of
Edina.
Adopted this 1St day of March 2005.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
ORDINANCE NO. 2005 -2 - AMENDING SECTION 1000 OF CITY CODE - CRIMES AND
FORBIDDEN CONDUCT ADOPTED Mr. Hughes indicated that Ordinance No. 2005 -2 provides for
the adoption of 'a trespass ordinance within the City Code. Violations of this Ordinance would be
punishable as a petty misdemeanor. The City presently charges trespassers under Minnesota Statutes.
Our City Prosecutor and the Police Department feel that it would be more appropriate to charge
violators, pursuant to the City Code, when possible.
Member Masica inquired what were the current penalties for a misdemeanor charge opposed to a
petty misdemeanor. Attorney Gilligan responded that a misdemeanor charge was up to 90 days and
$750.00 fine and with a petty misdemeanor it was issuance of a citation and a fine.
Member Masica made a motion, seconded by Member Housh approving Ordinance No. 2005 -2 -
Amending Section 1000 of City Code - Crimes and Forbidden Conduct as follows, with waiver of
second reading:
ORDINANCE NO. 2005-02
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1000
OF THE CITY CODE - CREUES AND, FORBIDDEN CONDUCT
The City Council of the City of Edina ordains:
Section 1. Section 1000 of the City Code is amended by adding a new Subsection 1000.14 as follows:
111000.14 Trespass. For purposes of this Subsection, the terms "premises ", "building ", "dwelling ", and
"owner or lawful possessor" have the meanings given to them under Minnesota Statutes 609.605. For
Page 6
Minutes/Edina City Council/March 1, 2005
purposes of this Subsection, the term " belief of property interest" shall mean a good faith belief that the
person has a possessory interest in the property as an owner, tenant, lessee, licensee or invitee. A person
who does not have a belief of property interest shall not:
A. Trespass on the premises of another and refuse to depart from the premises on demand of the
lawful possessor; or
B. Occupy or enter the dwelling or locked or posted building of another, without consent of the
owner or the consent of one who has the right to give consent, except in an emergency
situation; or
C. Return to the property of another within 30 days after being told to leave the property and not
return if the person is without consent of one with authority to consent.
Any person violating this Subsection upon conviction shall be guilty of a petty misdemeanor.
Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon passage and publication.
First Reading: March 1, 2005
Second Reading: Waived
Published: March 10, 2005
Attest
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor
Rollcall:
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -16 SUPPORTING HIGHWAY 100 IMPROVEMENTS Mr. Hughes
informed the Council that recently the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT)
announced its intention to delay the reconstruction of Highway. 100 through St. Louis Park until 2014.
It had previously been scheduled to be reconstructed in 2010. Staff was of the opinion that this
portion of Highway 100 provides a significant bottleneck for safe and efficient travel on Highway 100.
The bottleneck contributes to cut - through traffic in the northeastern part of Edina. Resolution No.
2005 -16 urges that MnDOT. reprioritize the reconstruction of this critical segment of the regional
roadway system.
Mr. Hughes said he would be participating in a panel held by Twin West Chamber. of Commerce
regarding traffic concerns and business interests on March 11. On March 15, St. Louis Park was
hosting a joint informational meeting for both St. Louis Park and Edina residents. Staff recommends
adopting Resolution No. 2005 -16.
Member Masica questioned whether funding was available for this project. Mr. Hughes reminded the
Council that Senator Michel was presently sponsoring a bill on funding. He noted that the purported
delay was due in part to the delay of federal dollars. MnDOT has explained that the project has not
been re- prioritized and other projects were coming in ahead of it. One exception was the Lafayette
Bridge, which was moved up the list because of structural problems.
Member Swenson made a motion approving Resolution No. 2005 -16 Approving Highway 100
Improvements as presented. .
Resolution No. 2005 -16
Resolution Supporting Reconstruction of Highway 100 and
Opposing Delays in the Proposed Project Schedule
Whereas, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDot) plans to reconstruct
Highway 100 between 36th Street and Cedar Lake Road to expand the roadway to a six -lane
freeway, replace the existing bridges to add an additional lane in each direction, rebuild the
interchanges at Highway 7 and Minnetonka Boulevard, correct deficient bridge clearances,
Page 7
Minutes/Edina City Council/March 1, 2005
improve drainage, address flooding problems under the railroad bridge, add water quality and
retention ponds, add noise mitigation walls, and correct other deficiencies in the system; and
Whereas, MnDot's 10 -year plan called for the reconstruction to begin in 2005, was
rescheduled to 2010, and is again proposed to be rescheduled to start no sooner than 2014; and
Whereas, the City of Edina believes Highway 100 improvements are essential to the
economic vitality and the quality of life in our community and the region at large for the following
reasons:
• Originally built in the mid- 1930's, this section is part of the original beltway around the
Twin Cities. Minimal work has occurred on this 2.1 -mile stretch of roadway over the last 60
years.
• This segment is the last four -lane section remaining on Highway 100 and is one of the
busiest and most congested four - lane freeways in the metro area. Traffic volumes on this
segment were over capacity in 2001 and are only, getting worse.
■ Crash rates for this stretch of Highway 100 are second highest of all non - interstate
roadways in Minnesota, with 25 percent of Highway 100 crashes occurring at the West 36th
Street terminus.
■ Local neighborhoods in Edina and St. Louis Park are inundated with cars during peak
drive -time hours. Cut - through traffic impacts the safety of our residents and their quality
of life.
■ The estimated project cost is $80 million for construction and $7 million for right -of -way
acquisition.. MnDOT has estimated that the delay to 2014 will increase project costs to at
least $104 million.
Now Therefore Be It Resolved, that the City Council of the City of Edina supports
reconstruction of Highway 100 and opposes delays in the proposed project schedule.
ADOPTED: the 1st day of March 2005.
Member Housh seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
ON -SALE INTOXICATING, CLUB ON -SALE AND SUNDAY SALE LIQUOR LICENSES
APPROVED. Mr. Hughes presented a list of restaurants holding On -Sale Intoxicating, Club On -Sale
and Sunday. Sale licenses which were recommended for approval. He explained that applications for
renewal have been reviewed by the Edina Police Department. Paperwork has been submitted from all
applicants in accordance with City Ordinances and State Statutes and license fees have been paid.
Sidney's Restaurant license was conditioned upon receiving proof that tax delinquency issues have
been resolved with the State of Minnesota. Mr. Hughes stated that one licensee, Ikasu Sushi Bar, had
not completed necessary paperwork in time to be included with the other renewals and would be
presented at a later date.
Member Swenson inquired if liquor licenses for Edina were comparable to surrounding cities. Mr.
Hughes said when other cities were surveyed; Edina was in the middle with licensing costs. Member
Swenson asked when fees would be studied. Mr. Hughes said all fees were examined in the fall.
Member Housh made a motion to approve renewals for the following: ON -SALE INTOXICATING
AND SUNDAY SALE: California Pizza Kitchen, Eden Avenue Grill, Lakeshore Grill, Louis XIII,
Maggiano's Little Italy, P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Romano's Macaroni Grill, Ruby Tuesday, Tejas,
and The Cheesecake Factory; and Sidney's Restaurant conditioned upon tax issues being resolved
Page 8
Minutes/Edina City Council/March 1, 2005
with the State of Minnesota; and CLUB ON -SALE and SUNDAY SALE: Edina Country Club, and
Interlachen Country Club. Member Masica seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
ON -SALE WINE LICENSE RENEWALS APPROVED Mr. Hughes presented the list of restaurants
holding On -Sale Wine and On -Sale Beer Licenses recommended for approval. He noted that when
establishments receive both an On -Sale Wine License and an On -Sale 3.2 Beer License, they might, per
State Statute with. no further license, sell strong beer in their. restaurants. Mr. Hughes reported that all
necessary documentation has been submitted for renewal, fees collected, and the Police Department
has recommended renewal.
Mr. Housh asked how often compliance checks were made on licensees. Mr. Siitari said that
compliance checks were done twice annually with a decoy and uniformed officers do a walk - through
monthly. Mr. Hughes noted that the same compliance checks were done at City facilities holding
liquor licenses.
Member Masica made a motion to approve issuance of ON -SALE WINE and ON -SALE 3.2 BEER
licenses as follows: Alfred's Cafe, Beaujo's Bistro, Chapati, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Chuck E.
Cheese's, D'Amico and Sons, Edina Grill, Good Earth Restaurant, Pizzeria Uno, Residence Inn
Edina, Szechuan Star Restaurant, and Yorktown Cinema Grill. Member Swenson seconded the
motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
3.2 BEER LICENSES RENEWALS APPROVED Mr. Hughes presented a list of applicants for
renewal of their 3.2 beer licenses, both On -Sale and Off -Sale, All necessary documentation has been
submitted for renewal, fees have been collected and the Police Department has recommended
approval.
Member Housh made a motion approving issuance of beer license renewals as follows: ON -SALE
3.2 BEER LICENSES: Davanni's Pizza/Hoagies, TJ's Family Restaurant; OFF -SALE 3.2 LICENSES:
Cub Foods, Holiday Stationstore #217, Jerry's Foods, Speedway Superamerica LLC. Member.
Swenson seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
*RESOLUTION NO.. 2005-17 APPROVED FOR SOUND WALL CONSTRUCTION WITH
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, CITY IMPROVEMENT NUMBERS SA-
10, SA -11, SA -9 Member Masica made ' a motion, seconded by Member Housh approving
Resolution No. 2005 -17 as presented:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-17
BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina, enter into Mn/DOT Agreement No. 87602 -R with
the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes:
To provide for payment by the City to the State of the City's share of the costs for Vernon
Avenue South, and noise walls No. 2, No. 3, and No. 5. construction and other associated
construction to be performed upon, along and adjacent to Trunk Highway No. 100 from Excelsior
Boulevard to 200 feet south of Minnehaha Creek within the corporate City limits under State
Project No. 2734- 40(T.H.100 =005).
. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute
the Agreement and any amendments to the Agreement.
Page 9
Minutes/Edina City Council/March 1, 2005
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
*CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Member Masica made a motion and Member Housh
seconded the motion approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check
Register dated February 17, 2005, and consisting of 29 pages: General Fund $394,098.76; CDBG
Fund $10,700.00; Communications Fund $1,626.77; Working Capital Fund $98,086.15; Construction
Fund $8,618.53; Art Center Fund $3,179.51; Golf Dome Fund $14,207.96; Aquatic Center Fund
$115.16; Golf Course Fund $13,000.64; Ice Arena Fund $32,924.32 Edinborough/Centennial Lakes
Fund $30,367.92; Liquor Fund $110,456.29; Utility Fund $234,168.42; Storm Sewer Fund $15,100.07;
PSTF Fund $26,040.00; TOTAL $992,690.50, and for approval of payment of claims dated February
23, 2005, and consisting of 28 pages: General Fund -$89,584.93; Communications Fund $8,678.05;
Working Capital Fund $5,171.05; Construction Fund $3,310.54; Art Center Fund $17,454.60; Golf
Dome Fund $1,962.97, Aquatic Center Fund $325.58; Golf_ Course Fund $7,196.16; Ice Arena Fund
$3,746.53; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $8,077.84; Liquor Fund $176,769.18; Utility Fund
$319,991.94; PSTF Fund $2,427.36; TOTAL $644,696.73.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting
adjourned at 11:20 P.M.
City Clerk
Page 10.
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT CITY HALL
MARCH 15, 2005
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson and Mayor
Hovland.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by
Member Housh approving the Council Consent Agenda as presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 15, 2005, APPROVED AS
CORRECTED Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh, approving
the Corrected Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina City Council for February 15, 2005.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005 - 21 ORDERING ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION
IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -326 - SUNNYSLOPE NEIGHBORHOOD Affidavits of Notice were
presented, approved and ordered place on file.
Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Member Masica to re -open the public hearing for
Improvement No. BA -326 Sunnyslope Neighborhood Street Improvement.
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
Engineer Presentation
Engineer Houle noted the public hearing for Improvement No. BA -326 Sunnyslope
Neighborhood Street Improvement began on February 15, 2005. At that time the hearing was
closed, but action continued to allow staff to further evaluate adding curb and gutter only where
necessary due to the grade of the roadway and to re -survey the neighborhood regarding lighting
preference. Mr. Houle noted staff also evaluated a third option replacing curb and gutter only in
existing locations.
Mr. Houle said that the Sunnyslope roadway and utilities were originally constructed in the
1940's. He said the existing roadways were:
• Between 26 and 32 feet wide
• Majority of streets without curb and gutter
• Many properties have boulders and landscaping in the boulevard right -of -way
causing problems with road maintenance
• Roadways very deteriorated with potholes and edge patching
• Drainage problems existed at roadways' edge.
Mr. Houle said the neighbors were surveyed regarding the curb and gutter with 42 of 73 surveys
returned. He reported of the 42 returned surveys, 29 respondents did not want curb and gutter
Page 1
Minutes/Edina City Council/March 15, 2005
and 13 did want them installed. Mr. Houle said that three options could be considered in the
roadway reconstruction project:
• Option A: Install new concrete curb and gutter throughout neighborhood
• Option B: Add new concrete curb and gutter only to specific areas, (erosion control
>5 %, drainage issues <1 %)
• Option C: Only replace curb and gutter in existing locations
Mr. Houle explained the need.to remove the impediments that over the years have been placed
within the City's boulevard rights -of -way. He displayed pictures of boulders and landscaping
that in his opinion represented safety concerns of either a clear -zone problem or snowplow
hazard.
The Council discussed the survey results and reviewed the options presented with the possibility
of constructing curbs from colored concrete, barrier removal (by whom and at whose cost),
intersection configuration, potential alternatives to concrete curb and gutter included a slight
build of bituminous and some potential soil stabilization.
Public Comment
David Lundstrom, 4912 Ridge Place, stated the statistics of survey respondents indicate that 29
did not want curb and gutter and only 13 wanted it. He asked that the street be reconstructed
without curb and gutter. He also questioned whether or not decorative streetlights were wanted.
Mr. Lundstrom stated he believed the neighborhood would be willing to pay for maintenance if it
were necessary.
Russ Fortner, 4920 West Sunnyslope Road, stated he was a twenty -nine year resident and
requested that the City fix what needed to be fixed, but leave everything else alone. Mr. Fortner
asked that the road width be left alone. He added that if future maintenance were necessary he
would accept being charged. Mr. Fortner added he did not want decorative streetlights.
Bruce Gustafson, 4808 West Sunnyslope Road, stated he did not want curb and gutter. He
questioned why it was proposed for his property, which was flat. Mr. Houle explained that
property with less than a one percent or more than a 75. percent grade needed curb and gutter
installed to control water run off and erosion.
Steve Makredes, 4916 West Sunnyslope Road, stated he believed that the wrong people were
making the decisions on whether or not curb and gutter should be installed. He urged the
Council to allow Engineering to make technical decisions, and not listen to personal preferences.
Mr. Makredes said he feared the neighborhood would end up with a sub - standard product if the
decision were based upon personal preferences. He also. recommended the City develop some
citywide standards relative to street lighting.
Bill Bailey, 4808 East Sunnyslope Road, stated he did not want curb and gutter installed, but also
questioned why their neighborhood should have to pay any additional maintenance.
Randy Moskahk, 4908 East Sunnyslope Road, stated that he felt residents were concerned about
costs. He stated he felt the real issue was the assessment policy and suggested waiting to make a
decision until the assessment policy had been developed.
Page 2
Minutes/Edina Ci!y Council/March 15, 2005
Member Housh asked about the soils in the Sunnyslope Neighborhood. He said that after
listening to the neighbors he was inclined to lean towards Option C installing the new street, but
only replacing the curb and gutter in its existing locations. Mr. Houle replied the soils were
sandy soils with a good sub grade.
Member Swenson stated she agreed with Member Housh favoring Option. C. She added she
would also leave the intersections alone. Member Swenson said she still believed the Engineer
should be listened to and his technical expertise followed.
Member Masica said she also would go along with Option C, leaving the sweeping intersection.
She would like to see the streets' edges stabilized if possible. Member Masica questioned the
possibility of leaving existing streetlights, but adding additional decorative lights. Mr. Houle
said he believed the existing lights would need to be replaced with decorative lights if that was
the choice for the installation.
Mayor Hovland commented that this Edina neighborhood had a special rural feeling. He also
favored Option C reconstructing the streets, but only replacing the existing curb and gutter.
Mayor. Hovland also wanted the intersections left alone, but he added the impediments should be
removed from the right -of -way as suggested by the Engineer.
Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson to close the public hearing.
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
Member Masica made a motion introducing the following resolution and moving its adoption
ordering Improvement No. BA -326, Sunnyslope Neighborhood Street Improvement as per
Option C outlined above:
RESOLUTION N0.2005 -21
ORDERING STREET IMPROVEMENT
NO. BA -326 SUNNYSLOPE NEIGHBORHOOD
WHEREAS, the Edina City Council on the 181i day of January, 2005, fixed a date for a
Council hearing on the proposed street reconstruction, Improvement No BA -326; and
WHEREAS, ten days' mailed notice and two weeks' published notice of the ;hearing
was given, and the hearing was held thereon on the 151i day of March 2005, for Sunnyslope
Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Improvement No. BA -326 reconstructing the existing
bituminous pavement, installing decorative street lighting, replacing the existing curbs and
gutters, replacing the existing watermain to the curb boxes, repairing the sanitary sewer where
needed, extending the storm sewer and installing drain tile where needed at which time all
persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council has duly considered the views
of all persons interested, and being fully advised of the pertinent facts, does hereby determine
to proceed with the construction of said improvement, including all proceedings which may
be necessary in eminent domain for the acquisition of necessary easements and rights hereby
designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as Improvement Project No.
BA -326 Sunnyslope Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Improvement Project No. BA -326 Sunnyslope
Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction is hereby ordered as proposed.
Page 3
Minutes/Edina City Council/March 15, 2005
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Engineer is hereby designated as the
engineer for this improvement. The engineer shall cause plans and specifications to be
prepared for the making of such improvement.
Adopted this 151h day of March 2005. Member Housh seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -22 APPROVED GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FIRST READING FOR ORDINANCE NO. 2005 -03
AMENDING SECTION 850 ALLOWING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT IN PCD -1, 2 AND 3
DISTRICTS -. HAUGLAND COMPANIES - 3901 -3907 50TH STREET WEST AND 5000 -5020
FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered place
on file. .
Presentation by Planner
Planner Larsen informed the Council the proposed re- development consisted of. two parcels
3901 -3907 West 501h Street and 5000 -5020 France Avenue South. He explained the properties
currently housed a number of retail stores fronting both France and West 50th as well as the
Arby's site. Mr. Larsen said the total land area of the combined sites was 30,648 square feet. He
noted the City owned a driveway easement on the west and north sides of the Arby's site. This
drive currently provides access to store loading areas and a central garbage and recycling area.
Mr. Larsen said the total floor area of existing stores was approximately 16,148. square feet. The
proposed redevelopment would increase the retail floor area to 22,500 square feet or an
approximate increase of 8,500 square feet.
Mr. Larsen explained the subject .properties were within the 50th and France Avenue
Redevelopment Plan area. He said the Plan identified certain sites for redevelopment at higher
intensities, noting that Arby's was one of those sites. The subject site was identified for 30,000
square feet of office and retail floor area. Parking would be provided in the public ramps. He
said that site was not specifically identified for redevelopment would be allowed to redevelop at
a floor area of 1.0 relying on existing public parking. This would mean that under current plans
and ordinance, the subject property could redevelop with a total floor area of 44,000 square feet
of combined retail and office space.
Mr. Larsen said the subject site, consisted of two parcels within, the southwest quadrant of the
intersection of 50th and France. He said the properties were zoned PCD -2, Planned Commercial
District and both were within the 50th and France Redevelopment Plan. The properties do not
border other zoning districts so no setbacks would be required for new buildings.
Mr. Larsen said the proponent was planning on demolishing all existing buildings on the site and
replacing them with 22,490 gross square feet of retail at ground level. The proposal also would
construct 23 condominium units on three levels above the ground level retail. He continued
noting a below grade parking garage will provide 45 parking stalls with access through the City's
ramp. These parking stalls would be for use �by condominium residents. The proposal would
use the city parking ramp as path for ingress /egress to the parking garage across the alley. This
will allow condo residents to cross the alley through the ramp at 90 degrees to avoid congestion
with delivery trucks. Two on grade stalls will be provided on the site with opportunity for more
on -street parking along France after elimination of the Arby's curb cut.
Page 4
Minutes/Edina Ci!y Council/March 15, 2005
Mr. Larsen said the existing alley. from west 51st Street to France Avenue would remain in place
with a slight adjustment in location to correct maneuverability. The trash area located along the
alley will remain serving most of the block as a delivery service area. The new project has been
designed to work with the existing route adding a loading area to reduce congestion and provide
for customer pick -up. .
Mr. Larsen said the proposed retail space complied with the 50th and France Avenue
Redevelopment Plan and all Edina zoning standards for the PCD -2 zoning district. However, the
PCD -2 district does not currently allow housing as a permitted use. He explained that housing
has historically.. been part of retail nodes such as redevelopment so an amendment has been
proposed that would add residential use as a Conditional Use in Planned Commercial Districts.
Mr. Larsen said that residential uses would need to comply with the District's standards, but
would be exempt from the floor area limit._ Residential use would need to provide private
parking to support the project.
Mr. Larsen reported the Planning Commission reviewed the proposal and recommended the
Council grant first reading to the ordinance amendment adding residential dwelling units as a
Conditional Use in the PCD -1, 2 and 3 districts; and Conditional Use Permit approval for C -05 -1,
Haugland Companies with the following conditions:
• Final adoption of the ordinance amendment
• Conditional Use Permit to allow dwelling units in proposed redevelopment
• Easements for public and private use
• Watershed District permits
Mr. Larsen introduced Gene Haugland the proponent to give greater detail of the project and
answer Council's questions.
Proponent Comment
Gene Haugland, 5229 West Highwood, reviewed the proposed project, which would consist of
retail space at ground level and residential condominiums on the second, third, and fourth levels.
Mr. Haugland said that access to the site's underground through the City's parking garage was
vital to the success of the project. He pointed out that the current trash collection site would be
left alone to continue serving the tenants of the commercial area.
Mr. Haugland said the project was slated to be constructed in two phases. The first phase would
raze Arby's and construct 8,500 feet of retail with condos above. When this phase was completed
the existing retail could move into the new area and the second phase of r razing the remaining
retail and replacing it with new commercial and condo units would commence.
He introduced Dan Young- Dixon, architect for the project to further describe details of the
proposed project. Mr. Young -Dixon showed schematic drawings depicting the site and
elevations of the project. He said the first level was slated to contain a variety of retail units; the
second level would contain eight condo units, the third eight condo units and the fourth condo
seven units. Mr. Young -Dixon said the building would be stepped back to maintain the view of
the Edina Theatre. He added stepping back the residential units would provide the ability to
have an outdoor deck area, and added to the safety of the units as well as the aesthetics. Mr.
Young -Dixon added that a great deal of design detail had been given to the commercial portion
Page 5
Minutes/Edina Ci!y Council/March 15, 2005
of the project to enhance the individual look of tenant. Additionally, Mr. Young -Dixon said the
sidewalk width had been increased to enhance pedestrian safety.
Jim Benshoof, Traffic Consultant, reviewed his February 16, 2005, memorandum studying the
traffic on the site. He explained his conclusions that the proposed redevelopment could provide
adequate operations within the site if the access arrangements outlined in his memo: 1) one -way
northbound alley entry into the site from 51s' Street; 2) driveway on France that will allow exiting
out of the site; 3) connection to the parking ramp opposite the entrance to the underground
parking garage that will allow residents to use the ramp to enter and exit the site. Access gates
restricted to the use of residents only would control the connection to the ramp.
Mr. Benshoof concluded that based upon his study he had three principal findings: 1) the
proposed redevelopment would not cause any negative impacts on France Avenue and at the
France Avenue /50th Street intersection; 2) adequate parking will be provided to effectively meet
the expected demand; and 3) satisfactory operations would be provided within the site.
Member Housh asked staff to comment upon the benefit of a mixed -use development. He added
he found the proposed project appealing. Member Swenson added that she understood the
current request was for PCD -2 and questioned amending the code to include PCD -1 and PCD -3.
Mr. Larsen said the mixed use development district have been successful since they meet a
combination of needs in one location. He said all PCD Districts were included in the proposed
amendment because this would be an opportunity. to return the residential use in combination
with commercial use, which had been successful in past years. He noted that since it was a
conditional use, any conditions deemed necessary. could be added to the permit, but that it would
allow some urban redevelopment to take place.
Member Masica stated the rendering shown was very nice, but expressed concern that the City
would be guaranteed the final product matched the level of quality shown in the rendering. She
added she also had concern with private use in a public parking structure. -. Mr. Young -Dixon
replied that the proponent would need to have site approval before beginning the construction.
Mr. Larsen explained that there would be cross easements in favor of the City governing use of
the parking ramp.
Public Comment
Kittie O'Dea, 4610 Bruce Avenue, urged the Council to look critically at traffic at the 50th and
France area and understand the implications before approving any redevelopment in the area.
Richard Curtin, 6310 McIntyre Point, stated he owned the Ampersand Building. Mr. Curtin said
that while he believed the commercial residential mix was a good thing, allowing that mix in this
area would limit the use of his property. He said some very nice restaurants have been looking at
his property, but that he was sure they would not be willing to locate next to residential. The
restaurants he has been working with want rooftop dining and he did not think this would be
possible due to noise regulations with residential property next to the restaurant. Mr. Curtin
asked that if the Council approved residential housing for this area they also make it public
policy that the residents must live with noise.
Ron Williamson, 4300 Eton Place, stated that at the public hearing held on the draft
Transportation Policy issues of traffic in the Country Club and Morningside neighborhoods
Page 6
Minutes/Edina City Council/March 15, 2005
surfaced due to traffic from 50th and France. He asked the Council to not approve the proposed
redevelopment until the traffic in the area has been rectified.
Rob Webb, 4516 Drexel Avenue, stated he favored development, but the Council must preserve
residential neighborhoods. He said the development at 50th and France in 1999 exacerbated
congestion in the area. Mr. Webb asked how the increased traffic from the new development
would be accommodated.
Grethe Langeland - Dillon, 4530 Bruce Avenue, stated her professional address was 3925 West 50th
Street, spoke as the 50th and France Business Association Chair. Ms. Dillon said she supported
the re- development. Ms. Dillon said she believed the urban landscape would be an asset to
Edina.
Mick Fogelberg, 4632 Bruce Avenue, expressed concern with traffic in the 50th and France area
and its impact on the surrounding residential areas. He questioned the numbers used in the
traffic study and asked the issue be addressed. Mr. Fogelberg stated he disagreed with the
previous speaker and was not in favor of the re- development.
Marty Miller, 4527 Drexel Avenue, stated traffic is a problem. He said people were already using
the ring road and that a real traffic study of the entire area needed to be completed before any
further re- developments were approved.
Jack Boyer, 4605 Arden Avenue, stated he felt what needed to be articulated was the safety of
families should be considered when considering the re- development.
Tom Bastings, 4617 Bruce Avenue, re- iterated the traffic concerns previously stated. He urged
further study of the traffic before approving the re- development.
Ralph Herda, 4501 Drexel Avenue, encouraged the Council to view this as an opportunity - not a
development decision, but an opportunity to undertake a comprehensive traffic study.
Jay Cameron, 4635 Casco, stated he loved the area, the ability to walk to 501h and France. He said
he heard about the project and was excited about it re- energizing 50th and France bringing new
life into the area. He urged the Council to look at traffic, but Mr. Cameron said in the long run he
felt this would be a wonderful development.
Member Swenson stated she was excited about the project and its opportunities for a different
group of people to live in the 501h and France areas. She stated her intent to support the re-
development.
Member Housh stated his sympathy for the traffic concerns but pointed out the 500, and France
area was a gem of Edina and the proposed re- development was a natural evolution. Member
Housh said he felt the proposed redevelopment would bring a number of appealing
opportunities to the community.
Member Masica agreed the proposed redevelopment was an exciting urban option. She also
expressed her sympathy for traffic in the area as well as some discomfort with the traffic study
Page 7
Minutes/Edina City Council/March 15, 2005
submitted with the development proposal. However, she added in her opinion this was the best
development submitted for this area.
Member Hulbert agreed the re- development proposal was exciting. She pointed out that the
proposal under consideration did not cause the traffic and perhaps it was time to address the
issue. Member Hulbert suggested that perhaps a moratorium on future development could be an
approach to allow comprehensive study of the traffic.
Member Swenson asked if this was the last piece of property with re- development rights from
the 501h and France Development Plan. She pointed out that the property could, according to the
City's Development Plan, be developed with a higher density that the current proposal. Mr.
Larsen stated that it was correct that this property was the last piece of property with re-
development right. He noted that the redevelopment right did not extend to either the bank or
the Ampersand building. Manager Hughes stated this would be the final piece implementing the
re- development plan for the 50th and France area. He added if the City desired to update the
plan that would be appropriate.
Member Hulbert stated she did not think trading three parking stalls in the ramp for three on-
street stalls was an even trade. Mr. Larsen pointed out that under the existing re- development
plan the property could hold a 31,000 square foot building, but the proposal was 8,500 square
feet, which would have a large effect on needed parking.
Mayor Hovland stated he liked the mixed. use proposed by the re- development and favored
amending the ordinance and commended Mr. Haugland for providing the mixed use
opportunity for urban redevelopment.
Member Masica inquired whether she should recuse herself from the discussion and final vote on
the subject Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance and the Conditional Use Permit because of a
family member being employed by the Opus Companies. Attorney Gilligan said there does not
seem to be a conflict of interest.
Member Swenson made a motion seconded by Member Housh to close the public hearing.
Ayes:. Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
Mayor Hovland made a motion to grant first reading to Ordinance No. 2005 -3 amending the
Code of Ordinances by adding Residential Dwelling Units as a Conditional Use in the PCD -1,
2 and 3 Zoning Districts; and introducing the following resolution and moving its adoption
with the following conditions: 1) Final adoption of Ordinance amendment; 2) Conditional Use
Permit to allow dwelling units in proposed redevelopment; 3) Easement for public and private
use; and 4) Watershed District permits.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-22
GRANTING APPROVAL OF A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO HAUGLAND COMPANIES
3901 -3907 WEST 50TH STREET AMD 5000 -5020 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH
WHEREAS, the procedural requirements of Code Section 850 (the Zoning Ordinance)
have been met, and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the Findings as required by Code Section No.
850.04 Subd. 4 have been satisfied:
Page 8
Minutes/Edina City Council/March 15, 2005
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby grants
approval of a Conditional Use Permit to Haugland Companies, 3901 -3907 West 50th Street and
5000 -5020 France Avenue South, to allow dwelling units in the PCD -2 Planned Commercial
District, with the following conditions: 1) Final adoption of Ordinance amendment; 2)
Conditional Use Permit to allow dwelling units in proposed redevelopment; 3) Easement for
public and private use; and 4) Watershed District permits
Passed and adopted this 15th day of March 2005.
Member Housh seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
*BID AWARDED FOR AIR MONITORING EQUIPMENT AND SENSORS - FIRE
DEPARTMENT Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh approving
the award of bid for air monitoring equipment and sensors for the Fire Department to
recommended low bidder, Compliance Training Services at $17,569.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR SELF - CONTAINED BREATHING APPARATUS (SCBA) AND
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh
approving the award of bid for Self- Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) and Support
Equipment to recommended bidder, Clarey's Safety Equipment under Minnesota Fire
Agencies Purchasing Consortium #NZ- 2004 -4 at $40,798.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR STORM SEWER REPAIR - PARKLAWN AVENUE AND FRED
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE POND - ENG 05 -3, IMPROVEMENT NO. STS -305 Motion made
by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh approving the award of bid for storm
sewer repair at Parklawn Avenue and the Fred Richards Golf Course Pond, ENG 05 -3,
Improvement No. STS -305 to recommended low bidder, Valley Rich Company, Inc. at
$34,450.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
AWARD OF BID APPROVED FOR BRAEMAR PARK ATHLETIC FIELD RENOVATION
NO. 05 -01PR Director Keprios indicated on February 24, 2005, bids were opened for renovation
of the Braemar Park athletic field. Specifications were nearly identical to those used at the Lewis
Park east, central and west athletic fields.
Project Specifications:
• Renovate athletic field (368' X 264')
• Strip and salvage existing 5 - 6 inches of topsoil
• Import 12 inches of new top soils
• Three inches of sand for drainage layer
• Nine inches of engineered sand /peat soils
• Drain tile
• Irrigation system
• Construct eight new catch basins
• One percent grade crown with laser guided equipment
• Start June 1, 2005; substantial completion by August 1, 2005
Why a Sand/ Peat Field:
Page 9
Minutes/Edina City Council/March 15, 2005
• Will withstand heavy use
• Will be safe and lasting surface
• Integrated Pest Management approach to turf maintenance
• Playable shortly after rain
• Safe surface preferred by athletes
Veit Companies - excavating, grading, topsoil, irrigation, drain tile
Turf Development - seeding, fertilizing, irrigation/ turf management
Topographic survey
Soil Borings /Soil Testing
Landscape architect/ engineering fees
TOTAL PROJECT COST
$277,700
9,000
2,466
2,000
18,050
$309,216
Member Masica inquired who did the Lewis Park renovation. Mr. Keprios said the Frattalone
Company and the Glenn Rehbein Company both worked on the Lewis Park renovation.
Member Swenson asked if the size of the field would change. Mr. Keprios responded that the
available land on the site would be maximized. Ms. Swenson inquired whether the site was still
being considered for construction of a "bubble ". Mr. Keprios said no.
Member Housh made a motion for award of bid for the Braemar Park Athletic Field
Renovation No. 05 -01PR to recommended low bidder, Veit Companies at $277,700.00. Member
Hulbert seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
*BID AWARDED. FOR GOLF COURSE SPRAY VEHICLE FOR BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh approving the award of
bid for a golf course spray vehicle for Braemar Golf Course to recommended low bidder, MTI
Distributing Company at $43,763.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR 2005 POLICE UNIFORM CONTRACT Motion made by Member
Masica and seconded by Member Housh approving the 2005 uniform contract for the Police
Department to recommended low bidder, Uniforms Unlimited at $8,852.75.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR TWO -1/2 TON CHEVROLET PICKUP TRUCKS FOR ENGINEERING
Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh approving the purchase of
two 1/2 ton Chevrolet pickup trucks for the Engineering Department to recommended bidder,
Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet under State Contract No. 433478 at $30,349.16.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
MAY 10, 2005, SELECTED FOR GREATER SOUTHDALE AREA STUDY JOINT MEETING
OF COUNCIL PLANNING COMMISSION AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Mr.
Hughes suggested a meeting date be set for a joint meeting of the Council, Planning Commission
and Transportation Commission for the Greater Southdale Area.
Page 10
Minutes/Edina City Council/March 15, 2005
Following a brief Council discussion, May 10, 2005, was set for a joint meeting from 5:00 P.M. to
8:00 P.M. with the Council, Planning Commission and the Transportation Commission.
No formal Council action was taken.
ASSESSMENT POLICY CONSULTANT ENGAGED Assistant Manager Anderson indicated
that staff held preliminary discussions with a consultant to review a proposed assessment policy
that the Council had previously reviewed in their January and February work sessions. The
consultant would study the benefit various priced residences experience from replacement of
public improvements such as curb and gutter and road replacement. The study would cost
approximately $15,000 - $20,000 and take sixty days to complete. During the study, staff will meet
with neighboring City officials in order to gain a better understanding of their assessment
funding policies. Results and a policy proposal will be before the Council when the research is
completed. Funds for this study will come from the Contingency budget within the General
Fund.
Member Housh said this is a great idea and will help with decisions in the future. He asked if this
should have been handled through a bidding process. Mr. Anderson said this is a highly
recommended firm and is a professional service that does not require bids being sought.
Member Masica stated her approval with any amount of information that can be gathered with
such a complicated issue.
Member Hulbert made a motion authorizing engagement of a consultant to review the
proposed assessment policy as selected by staff. Member Housh seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
INTERSECTION RECONFIGURATION FOR VALLEY VIEW ROAD, OAKLAWN AVENUE
AND WEST 62ND STREET APPROVED Engineer Houle explained the Council awarded the
Valley View Road and Wooddale Avenue reconstruction project bid on July 6, 2004. Construction
commenced in July 2004. Staff recommended safety improvements to the intersection of Valley
View Road with Oaklawn Avenue and West 62nd Street. Council directed staff to further evaluate
the intersection for alternate options.
The intersection was evaluated by staff with four options; A) diversion of traffic and place a cul-
de -sac at West 62nd Street; B) roadway easement needed - create a park -like entrance into the
neighborhood, possibly requiring condemnation; C) diversion of traffic by closing off access from
Oaklawn and W. 62nd on to Valley View Road; and D) poor definition of driver's right -of -way
and maintaining it as it is. A traffic study was performed and a survey sent to area residents with
four intersection options. As a result of the study, staff evaluated the intersection and created an
alternate design that minimizes any diversion or change of the existing traffic pattern and helps
define driver's right -of -way.
Mr. Houle intimated that survey results were varied. After re- visiting the Council's request, staff
combined Option B and Option D (now referred to as Option E) as follows:
• Maintains a relatively standard T- intersection
• Provides better definition of driver's right -of -way
Page 11
Minutes/Edina City Council/March 15, 2005
• Provides safer pedestrian movements
• Minimizes any change in existing traffic pattern or diversion of traffic
• Does not require additional roadway. easements
• Does not increase project cost
Ms. Masica asked if STOP signs were considered in option E. Mr. Houle said there would be
STOP signs at Oaklawn and West 62nd Street. Ms. Masica asked what the crossing distance would
be at the reconfigured intersection. Mr. Houle responded Valley View Road would have a 32 -foot
crossing. In the future, sidewalks would be proposed on either side of West 62nd Street.
Ms. Swenson concurred with Option E as proposed.
Resident Comment:
Janie Weston, 6136 Brookview, previously at 6145 Oaklawn, voiced concern with Option E that
does not allow enough traffic stacking room. The reconfigured T- intersection still makes the
driveway at 6145 Oaklawn difficult to exit because of traffic. She stated that even if traffic were to
double on Brookview it would still be nothing. She suggested Option A with the installation of a
cul -de -sac. Mr. Houle said the . safest option would be the cul -de -sac but feedback from the
neighborhood was negative for a cul -de -sac. He stated that Option E in his opinion is the best
option.
Becky Whitbeck, 6128 Brookview, indicated after considering Option E, she said it would be the
best option.
Member Housh made a motion approving and authorizing the reconfiguration of the
intersection at Valley View Road with Oaklawn Avenue and West 62nd Street under Imp. No.
BA -321. Member Swenson seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica; Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
BOARD AND COMMISSION TERM LIMITS DECISION CONTINUED TO APRIL 5, 2005
Mr. Hughes noted on February 15, 2005, the Council received his report on the policies of
neighboring cities with respect to term limits for Board and Commission appointees.
After a brief discussion, Member Housh suggested continuing the Board and Commission term
limits discussion/decision to the meeting of April 5, 2005, because of the late hour. Member
Hulbert seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
INDIAN HILLS SUBDIVISION LAWSUIT DISCUSSED Mayor Hovland inquired of the
Council whether a Closed Council meeting would be necessary to discuss the Indian Hills
Subdivision lawsuit. Council consensus was that a Closed Council meeting was not necessary.
Attorney Gilligan indicated that District Court rendered its decision with respect to Pederson vs.
Edina last month. The Court upheld the validity of our subdivision ordinance and ruled in favor
of Pederson as to the merits of his subdivision proposal. The Court also ruled that the
moratorium imposed on subdivisions was not valid as to the Pederson matter. Unfortunately, the
Page 12
Minutes/Edina City Council/March 15, 2005
Court's ruling as to the moratorium validity was ambiguous and could have been interpreted to
apply to any subdivision application. The Council asked the Court to rectify the ambiguity and
the Court agreed and issued language that clarified the invalidation of the moratorium applied to
Pederson only.
The City must now decide whether to appeal the Court's ruling concerning the Pederson
subdivision by the middle of April. The decision as to an appeal must be made in public session.
Member Masica made a motion not to appeal the Indian Hills Subdivision lawsuit. Member
Housh seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
*RESOLUTION NO 2005 -20 SETTING PUBLIC HEARING DATE OF APRIL 19, 2005, FOR
ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS: NO. A -216 - SCHAEFER ROAD; NO. A -217 -
SCHAEFER CIRCLE• AND NO. BA -328 - WEST 58TH STREET Member Masica introduced the
following Resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-20
SET PUBLIC HEARING DATE OF APRIL 19, 2005,
FOR ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS:
NO. A -216 - SCHAEFER ROAD
NO. A -217 - SCHAEFER CIRCLE
NO. BA -328 - WEST 58TH STREET
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA,
MINNESOTA, that a public hearing shall be held on the 19th day of April, 2005, in the Council
Chambers at City Hall at 7:00 P.M. to consider Improvement No. A -216 Schaefer Road from
Interlachen Boulevard to Westwood Court; Improvement No. A -217 Schaefer Circle East of
Schaefer Road; and Improvement No. BA -328 from Concord Avenue to Wooddale Avenue.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall give mailed and published
notice of such hearing and improvements as required by law.
ADOPTED this 15th day of March, 2005.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW OF TUESDAY, MARCH 8, 2005, APPROVED Motion
made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh approving the Traffic Safety. Staff
Review for March 8, 2005, Section A:
1. "NO PARKING" restrictions for the north side of West 42nd Street from the
intersection of Grimes Avenue to the east spanning 115 feet to the School's entrance;
2. Installation of a "NO PARKING ANYTIME" zone on the south side of West 7th
Street from Highway 169 to Lincoln Drive;
Section B. and Section C.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
GYMNASIUM UPDATE PRESENTED Mr. Housh explained that the Gymnasium Committee
has received input from the user groups with many good ideas. One topic that was mentioned
often was the utilization of parking on the site. He said some additional costs have been added to
the project, many worthy and some mandated. The cost of the facility at present is under $5
million or up approximately 15% from the original estimate. Mr. Housh said the Committee
should be before the Planning Commission in the very near future. Mr. Hughes said the timetable
Page 13
Minutes/Edina City Council/March 15, 2005
would be approximately as follows: 1) a drawing could be forthcoming March 16, 2005, 2) a
traffic and parking analysis has been completed, 3) the Planning Commission will hear the
subject at their March 30th meeting, and 4) if the plan is approved by the Planning Commission, it
would be before the Council on April 19, 2005.
Director Keprios noted that the 'input committee' provided valuable information into the design
and program stage. The plan was originally at $4.1 million to build the two buildings at 8,000
square feet. The square feet have increased to 10,000 and would include an elevator. He added
that some of the costs could be value - engineered out of the final cost.
Mr. Housh said the estimated time of completion of the project would be the summers of 2006.
No formal Council action was taken.
*CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Member Masica ,made a motion and Member Housh
seconded the motion approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the
Check Register dated March 2, 2005, and consisting of 21 pages: General Fund $320,154.28;
Communications Fund $1,905.82; Working Capital Fund $3,846.95; Art Center Fund $1,620.49;
Golf Dome Fund $316.52; Aquatic Center Fund $1,244.99; Golf Course Fund $2,108.71; Ice
Arena Fund $21,485.26; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes. Fund $2,519.62; Liquor. Fund
$126,176.27; Utility Fund $34,755.11; Storm Sewer. Fund $1,715.02; PSTF Fund $124.72; TOTAL
$517,973.76; and for approval of payment of claims dated March 9, 2005, and consisting of 29
pages: General Fund $355,866.53, CDBG Fund $10,720.00; Communications Fund $14,606.40;
Working Capital Fund $49,478.54; Art Center Fund $5,870.40; Golf Dome Fund $17,773.21;
Aquatic Center Fund $73.87, Golf Course Fund $21,897.09; Ice Arena Fund $31,055.07;
Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $15,149.49; Liquor Fund $181,063.96; Utility Fund
$23,444.26; Recycling Fund $33,874.00; PSTF Fund $2,664.63, TOTAL $763,537.45.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -19. APPROVED - CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON AN
ISSUE OF REVENUE BONDS BY THE CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS' ON BEHALF OF
FAIRVIEW HEALTH SERVICES ON APRIL 5, 2005 Attorney. Gilligan explained the City has
received a request from Fairview. Health Services that the City consent to the issuance by the City
of Minneapolis of tax- exempt revenue bonds under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.152 to
469.165, to finance the remodeling project of Fairview Southdale Hospital and to refund bonds
previously. issued by the Minnesota Agricultural and Economic Development Board in 1997 and
2000, a portion of. proceeds of which financed improvements at Fairview Southdale.
Approximately $35,000,000 of the principal amount of the bonds would be used to finance the
proposed remodeling to be undertaken at Fairview Southdale Hospital. The debt service on the
bonds would be payable solely from payments made by Fairview, and the City would not have
any liability with respect to the bonds and would not be required to enter into any agreements
with respect to the bonds. Fairview would pay all expenses.
Mr. Gilligan said if the Council wished to proceed with the issuance of the bonds, a resolution
setting a public hearing on the bonds should be set for the April 5, 2005, Council meeting.
Mr. Housh noted that he is on the Board of Fairview Southdale Hospital and asked if he should
be recused from the discussion and final vote. Mr. Gilligan indicated there would be no conflict
of interest in the discussion and subsequent vote.
Page 14
Minutes/Edina City Council/March 15, 2005
Ms. Masica questioned whether the reference to Fairview paying all City expenses was Edina or
Minneapolis. Mr. Gilligan said it was Edina.
Member Masica introduced the following resolution and moved its approval:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-19
CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEAIRNG. ON AN ISSUE
OF REVENUE BONDS BY CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS
ON BEHALF OF FAIRVIEW HEALTH SERVICES
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the
City), as follows:
1. Fairview Health Services, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation ( "Fairview "), has
advised this Council of its desire to finance the remodeling of portions of Fairview. Southdale
Hospital in the City, and the acquisition and installation of items of equipment therein and
the refunding of the Health Care System'Revenue Bonds, Series 1997 (Fairview Hospital and
Healthcare Services) and the Health Care System Revenue Bonds, Series 2000A (Fairview
Health Services) of the Minnesota Agricultural and Economic Development Board with
revenue bonds (the "Revenue Bonds ") issued by the City of Minneapolis under the authority
of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 through 469.165.
2. Since the facilities proposed to be financed or refinanced by the Revenue
Bonds are located in the City, Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
and regulations promulgated thereunder, require that prior to the issuance of the Revenue
Bonds, this Council approve the issuance of the Revenue Bonds by the City of Minneapolis,
after conducting a public hearing thereon. A public hearing on the proposal that the City of
Minneapolis issue the Revenue Bonds to finance the Project is hereby called and shall be held
on April 5, 2005, of 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the City Hall.
3. The City Clerk shall cause notice of the public hearing, in substantially the
form attached hereto as Exhibit A, to be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the
City, once not less than 14 days prior to the date fixed for the public hearing.
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF EDINA
4801 WEST 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON
THE ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS
UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES,
SECTIONS 469.152 -.469.165
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina,
Minnesota (the City), will meet on April 5, 2005, at 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the City Hall, 4801
West 50th Street, in Edina, Minnesota, for the purpose of conducting a public hearing on a
proposal that the City of Minneapolis, Minnesota (Minneapolis) issue revenue bonds (the
Revenue Bonds). on behalf of Fairview Health Services (the Corporation), in one or more
series, under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 through 469.165, in order to finance the
remodeling of Fairview Southdale Hospital, located at 6401 France Avenue South in the City
of Edina, and the acquisition and installation of items of equipment therein, and to refund two
series of bonds issued by the Minnesota Agricultural and Economic Development Board a
portion of the proceeds of which financed improvements to Fairview Southdale Hospital and
the acquisition of items of equipment therein. Fairview Southdale Hospital is owned and
operated by the Corporation. The maximum aggregate principal amount of the proposed
Page 15
Minutes/Edina Ci!y Council/March 15, 2005
Revenue Bonds to be issued to finance the remodeling to be undertaken at Fairview Southdale
Hospital is $35,000,000. The Revenue Bonds will not be issued by the City.
All persons interested may appear and be heard at the time and place set forth
above, or may file written comments with the City Clerk prior to the date of the hearing set
forth above.
Dated: March 15, 2005.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Debra Mangen, City Clerk
Member Housh seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
JOINT MEETING WITH THE EDINA PUBLIC ART COMMITTEE DATE/TIME SET Mr.
Hughes suggested the Council and the Edina Public Art Committee set a joint meeting for April
5, 2005, at 5:30 P.M. in the Community Room.
No formal Council action was taken.
REMINDER - BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS ANNUAL MEETING Mr. Hughes reminded
the Council of the Annual Meeting of the Boards, Commissions, Committees to be held March 29,
2005, at 5:00 P.M. at the Centennial Lakes Park Centrum.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting
adjourned at 11:00 P.M.
City Clerk
Page 16
MINUTES
OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
ON MARCH 8, 2005 AT 5:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson and
Mayor Hovland. Also attending the meeting were Transportation Commission members
Bennett, Plante, Thorpe and Chair Richards.
Mayor Hovland explained the purpose of the meeting was to review the proposed draft
Transportation Policy and make revisions to the document.
The Council and Commission conducted a page -by -page review of the draft policy
suggesting possible changes ending on page nine and set another special meeting for
Monday March 14, 2005, at 5:00 p.m. Issues discussed included delineating the difference
between the existing Transportation Plan in the City's Comprehensive Plan and the
Transportation Commission Policy, inclusion of the term cut-through traffic, language
considering pedestrians and bicyclists when streets were redeveloped, and timing of
Transportation Commission review of developments/ redevelopments.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, the Mayor adjourned the meeting
at 6:55 p.m.
City Clerk
MINUTES
OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
ON MARCH 14, 2005 AT 5:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson and
Mayor Hovland. Also attending the meeting were Transportation Commission members
Bennett, Plante, Thorpe and Chair Richards.
Mayor Hovland explained the purpose of the meeting was to continue the review of the
proposed draft Transportation Policy begun on March 8, 2005.
The Council continued their review of the draft Transportation Commission Policy. It was
agreed that Mayor Hovland would submit his redline copy of the draft policy to City staff
for distribution. One major change was in the needed percentage of responses of a petition
to study. Consensus was that when a Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan was
received and neighborhood survey conducted, moving forward would require a 51 percent
return with 65 percent of the returned surveys supporting the project.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, the Mayor adjourned the meeting
at 8:00 p.m.
City Clerk
MINUTES
OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
ON MARCH 15, 2005 AT 5:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Hulbert, Masica, Swenson and Mayor
Hovland.
Mayor Hovland explained the purpose of the meeting was to receive training required by
Minnesota Statutes for their work as the City's Board of Equalization.
Assessor Wilson conducted the training of the Council as required by Statutes.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, the Mayor adjourned the meeting
at 7:00 p.m.
City Clerk
.;r-
CONSENT ITEM II. B.
LOCATION MAP
Case Number: LD -05-3
Location: 6016 -6020 Berne Circle
Request: Party Wall Lot Division
Draft Minutes PC Meeting March 30, 2005, 7:00 PM
LD -05-3 Robert and Rebecca Prasclunas
6016 -6020 Berne Circle
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the proponents are requesting a
party wall lot division of an existing double bungalow. Mr. Larsen stated the
property meets all requirements for division with separate utilities provided.
Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends party wall lot division approval.
Commissioner Lonsbury moved to recommend lot division approval.
Commissioner Fischer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried.
Regular Meeting of the
Edina Planning Commission
Wednesday, March 30,2005,7:00 PM
Edina City Hall Council Chambers
4801 West 50th Street
Staff Report
Case Number:
LD -05 -3
Location:
6016 -20 Berne Circle
Owner:
Robert and Rebecca Prasclunas
6016 Berne Circle
Zoning:
R -2, Double Dwelling Unit District
Request:
Party Wall Lot Division of existing double bungalow.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval. The property meets all requirements for division.
FRANK R. CARDARELLE Land Surveyor °.
941 -3031 Eden Prairie, IVIN55344
Survey or Robert Prasciunius Book Page File 5808
6016' Berne Orc e
Edina, MN
• bpd �� + '
Scgle s .1" =30'
P '0
0 �
i �N
a
I / pry
so,
Lft
6016.;Berne Circle
Lot 3 dx rapt that.: pa described as fol.lowe z
That;, „pa -of Lot 3 lylnq -46: tbWoi s rly. of a -lire- descxil;ed 4s running
from,:a oirit in the'' 44''t Tine of s id Lpt 3 distant 147.0 9eet Ngrth'
of th Southwest, cazner thereof, t a point in the Southeagterly lir
31.5 eet Nortt;aa'a r
4WIy from jt�h�ej��m st Southeasterly corner 4fi said
Lot, '_ lra a tiJi ruigc�o�r`recl� e�xeeanlallon d aiu`�neyai tDhs baiu�d ' d
Hennepin County. Minnesota and of the location of all wilding • n. d all
viable sneroaahmenta. it any. Irom or on said land. Swrevsyed by Mau 21 S t d w a March,, 2005
04/01/2005 14:11 9528935460 GIBRALTAR TITLE
1 3030•
A 12.41PM•
PAGE 02
Sent By: FRANK R CARDARELLE; 952 -94 - , Page 2/3
- ' Land Surveyor
FRANK R. GARDAREL.LE Eden Prairie, MN 55344
941 -3031
Survey For Robert P r a s c i u n i u s Book PEsge
Flle 5808
0 Berne C r.c e
Edina, TAN
15$x.
LAC ' O' A �► ..15
�C
ti
'r
4.
ILL
0z¢ .
603..E ]Berne Circle
Sole : a " =30 '
2-019 Nw- this Lot 3 a�x�q@I that..part deacribad all followo m
TYsaiw;:.,p$rt
'Of Lot 3 1 � ,S.cautr►aor ®sterly of a lira des 161.0 feet zNort s .
from•: a point in the apt 11 nee of said Lai: 3 In the 107,0 te ]a7olin
of the Southwaat •cx =6V thereof, t+a a poi nir ir► the SouthaQa t fz$oldin�r
31.5 feet Hcrt eas"r,'Iy from the most Southeasterly co�C" +�
3 a 1 �n 9' oc�it .. D CiCAS AdD
Lott' � �hwu% w+.nd'eaneoi�.ww.e.m« a a,w.sy 00
as measured along said Gwnly. M`nrwnaa and d.h. ��O^ W wWbi ^o}J ! !�
Southeasterly line list d+o rc 2Q05
1.
.wb...awduMM..l�.er. Re Y- 3 3%"�% ri' •,c
04/01/2005 14:11 9526935460 GIBRALTAR TITLE PAGE 03
Sent By,- FRANK R CARDARELLE; 952- 941 -3030; Apr -1 -05 12:40PM; Page 1/3
- Land Surveyor
FRANK R. CARDARELLE Eden Prairie, MN 55344
941 -3031
ottr at iza % f ur
Survey For R n h P r P r a sci
Book Page_ File 5! 8 8
6020 Berne Circle
Edina. MN
5* x... �.
SF!TP y ��� r
114 J.
e6
f e-p V a4
tZ. 4e
1 _ ---- -
1
scales 1" =301
60 20 Be rneii Circle `•
2eg�Fxpa on:
Thst part o� Lot 3 lying Southeasterly of v* line described am r..urflp�nc3
from a point In the West UPS of said Lat 3 $iatsnt 7.07.0 t ® ®t NO��h
of the southwest corner thereof, to Fa point In the BoutheostorliF linO
31.5 feeti Northeasterly from the Most southeasterly corner of 0-4d
Lot 3 10x11 'in Block 1, DECKAS ADDXTION
k as measured along said Southeasterly line
I hereby cWtHY 0441 this Ia a 11" and aorrem reprosen0adun of o survey of the boundarioa at above rcjj-gc ribO4 .. ps' r M y
Mennopin County. Mkn ote and 01 the Ippalbn el aU bu' 'Yeoq. and as
vNmle enwow*rneehl, 11 any. 4orn or a1 nail Land. 8ureveyed by mo 14i. 21 S _daY d M a r c h ,. 2 0 0 5
✓,3.31_ar ��
0,
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Craig Larsen
City Planner
Date: ,April 5, 2005 °
REPORT/RECOM M EN DATION
Subject:
Wallingford Properties -
5101 70 Street West
Recommendation:
No Council action required.
Agenda Item: u. C.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
Information /Background:
The City Council approved a rezoning to allow redevelopment of this site with a
106 -unit development on July 20, 2004. The plans illustrated a 74 -unit rental building
and a 32 -unit condominium building. At this time construction has not commenced on
either building.
The owner of the 72 -unit site, Vasco Bernardi, has asked to appear before the
Council to give an update on the project, and suggest possible changes to the approved .
plans. The changes could include an increase in the number of affordable units, an
increase in total unit count, and some level of public assistance for the project.
Details of the plans and financing will be presented at the Council meeting.
a
® To Council
Action: ❑ Motion.
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
® Discussion
Information /Background:
The City Council approved a rezoning to allow redevelopment of this site with a
106 -unit development on July 20, 2004. The plans illustrated a 74 -unit rental building
and a 32 -unit condominium building. At this time construction has not commenced on
either building.
The owner of the 72 -unit site, Vasco Bernardi, has asked to appear before the
Council to give an update on the project, and suggest possible changes to the approved .
plans. The changes could include an increase in the number of affordable units, an
increase in total unit count, and some level of public assistance for the project.
Details of the plans and financing will be presented at the Council meeting.
a
o e
�y REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor Hovland and Members of the City Council
FROM: John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation
VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
DATE: April 5, 2005 AGENDA ITEM III. A.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Kojetin Park Playground Equipment
Compan y Amount of Quote or Bid
1. Koohno Construction, Inc. I. $ 107,815.00
2. Arrigoni Brothers Company 2.$ 113,851.50
3. BCG Construction 3. $ 114,700.48
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Account #: 47039.6710
Koolmo Construction, Inc. $107,815.00
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This is for the purchase and installation of new replacement playground equipment at Kojetin Park per
specifications. On Tuesday, March 22, 2005, bids were opened for the purchase and installation of
replacement playground equipment at Kojetin Park.
Assistant Director, Ed MacHolda, worked closely with a Kojetin Park neighborhood committee in
selecting the playground equipment and design. The committee visited playground sites and viewed
catalogs from various playground equipment vendors. The committee chose Columbia Cascade's
playground equipment, TimberForm2, which is the same playground equipment installed at Rosland and
Normandale Park. As shown on the attached drawing, the new playground equipment will have 4 swings
and a variety of slides, climbers, a tire swing, and resilient wheelchair accessible safety surfacing to the
play structure, concrete apron, and drain tile. Park Maintenance staff will remove and dispose of the old
playground equipment, which was installed in 1991.
This project is funded by the capital improvement plan, which was budgeted at $110,000. If approved by
the City Council, the new Kojetin Park playground equipment will be installed no later than July 1, 2005
This Recommended bid is
within budget
Edina Park and Recreation
Department
not within
We Director
o e
v � .by
•j loss • REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor Hovland and Members of the City Council
FROM: John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation
VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
DATE: April 5, 2005
AGENDA ITEM III. B.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Jacobsen HR -9016 Rotary Mower — Park Maintenance Department
Compan y Amount of Quote or Bid
1. Carlson Tractor Company 1. $52,609.00
2: (State Contract #434108) 2.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Account #: 1650.6710
Carlson Tractor Company $56,609.00 (plus sales tax)
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This is for purchase of a 2005 Jacobsen HR -9016 Rotary Mower for the Park Maintenance
Department. This new rotary mower replaces a 1992 Toro model 580 -D Rotary Mower #47.451.
The $52,609.00 cost includes the $8,500 trade -in allowance for the 1992 rotary mower. This new
Jacobsen rotary mower cuts a grass swath 16' wide and is used primarily for all large grass areas,
including athletic fields, for all parklands west of Highway 100. Alternate bids are not required
because it is being purchased under the State Contract #434108, which is currently the most
competitive price available.
This purchase is funded under the Maintenance
John Keprios! Director
This Recommended bid is
within budget
Edina Park and Recreation
Department
not within budget a n, ffn_Tnce Director
Manager
o e
�o REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
Teas
TO:- - Mayor Hovland and Members of the City Council
FROM: John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation
VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
DATE: April 5, 2005
AGENDA ITEM: III. C.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: 3/4 Ton Pick -Up Truck — Park Maintenance Department
Company
Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet
(State Bid Contract #433478)
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet $18,404.90
Amount of Quote or Bid
1.$18,404.90
Account #: 1650.6710
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This is for purchase of a new 3/4 ton 4X4 Chevrolet regular cab pick -up truck with a trailer tow
package and snowplow preparation package for the Park Maintenance Department. This vehicle
replaces a similar 1996 Dodge 4X4 pick -up truck #47.280 that is used by the mowing crew and
for snowplowing. The new vehicle is purchased under the Minnesota State contract bid #433478.
Funding for this vehicle is under the equipment replacement budget. The new vehicle comes
factory painted dark green color with a cloth interior. The 1996 Dodge will be sold in the public
auction.
t
John WKepoZ,ector
This Recommended bid is
within budget
not wit]
Edina Park and Recreation
Department
o e�
v @:� - �O
• rNroRBpORA�E9 •
AGENDA ITEM:
DATE:
III,D.
March 31, 2005
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
FROM: CHIEF MICHAEL SIITARI
VIA: GORDON L. HUGHES, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
ITEM DESCRIPTION: 11 P -90 Carbines, Accessories & Ammunition
COMPANY BID AMOUNT
1. Streichers Police Equipment 1. $42,550.00
2. 2.
3. 3.
4. 4.
RECOMMENDED BID: Streichers is the sole source for the manufacturer in the Upper
Midwest.
GENERAL INFORMATION: The carbines would replace the surplus military rifles (M-
16s) the Emergency Response Team currently uses. A private donor has covered the entire
cost of the transition to the new weapons, including ammunition and all accessories.
V�nr� POLICE
V.
Signature Department
The Rec m de is (within budget) (not within budget)
GoraoG L. Hughes, i anager J n Wallin, Finance Director
TO: Mayor & City Council
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
FROM: Wayne D. Houle, P.E., Director of Public Works.
VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15.000
DATE: April 5, 2005 AGENDA ITEM III. E.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Commodities Purchase - Sand, Rock, Bituminous Materials, Concrete &
Engine Oil, and Water Treatment Chemicals.
Company
1. See Attached Tabulation.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Award to companies as listed on attached page.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Amount of Quote or Bid
1. See Attached Tabulation
This is the bid establishing the prices for certain materials used in public works projects. The prices are
firm for a period of one year (April 1, 2005 to March 31, 2006). The funds for the purchases come from
the money allocated to the operating section of the budget (1300, 1500, and 5900 accounts). Prices of
previous year are compared where applicable.
/' � J�ez - A
Si nature
The Recommended Bid is
within budget
not within
Public Works
Department
Hughes, CityMhQger
Director
2005
COMMODITIES BID RESULTS: SAND, ROCK, BITUMINOUS MATERIALS, CONCRETE, PROPANE, ENGINE OIL,
and WATER TREATMENT CHEMICALS
BID ITEM NO
UNIT
ITEM
COMPANY
2005
2004
Comparison
Of % +Or-
1
Ton
Deliv. Coarse Sand
SA -AG
$ 6.45
5.42
19.00%
2
Ton
Deliv. Cl. 2 Limestone
Midwest As halt Rec cle Mat
$ 10.50
10.97
- 4.28%
2
Ton
Deliv. CI.2 Limestone Alt Bid _Bryan
Rock New Mat
$ 11.60
10.97
5.74%
3
Ton
Deliv. FA -2 Seal Coat Chips
Dresser Trap Rock
$ 28.80
25.70
12.06%
4A
*Ton
Asp halt 2331 Base Type 31 or 32
Midwest Asphalt - Del
$ 32.60
30.50
6.89%
Midwest Asphalt - PU
$ 27.60
23.501
17.45%
Alt Bid
Bitmunious Roadways - Del
$ 35.00
31.35
11.64%
Alt Bid
Bituminous Roadways - PU
$ 27.50
27.35
0.55%
4B
*Ton
As halt 2331 Base Type 41 or 42
Midwest Asphalt - Del
$ 33.75
32.00
5.47%
Midwest Asphalt - PU
$ 28.75
24.50
17.35%
Alt Bid
Bituminous Roadways - Del
$ 37.00
32.50
13.85%
Alt Bid
Bituminous Roadways - PU
$ 29.50
28.50
3.51%
4C
*Ton
As halt 2331 Wear Type 41 or 42
Midwest Asphalt - Del
$ 32.75
31.00
5.65%
Midwest Asphalt - PU
$ 27.75
2330
18.09%
Alt Bid
Bituminous Roadways - Del
$ 35.50
31.50
12.70%
Alt Bid
Bituminous Roadways - PU
$ 28.00
27.50
1.82%
4D
*Ton
Asphalt 2331 Wear Type 31 or 32
Midwest Asphalt - Del
$ 33.50
32.00
4.69%
Midwest Asphalt - PU
$ 28.50
24.50
16.33%
Alt Bid
Bituminous Roadways - Del
$ 37.00
32.25
14.73%
Alt Bid
Bituminous Roadways - PU
$ 29.50
28.25
4.42%
4E
Ton
lAsphalt 2360
Midwest Asphalt - Del
$ 33.75
0.00
New Item
Midwest Asphalt - PU
$ 28.75
0.00
New Item
Alt Bid
Commercial Asphalt - PU
$ 33.40
0.00
New Item
5
CY
Delivered Concrete 3+ Yds.
Ag Ind./Eagan
$ 80.65
78.65
2.54%
6
Gal.
Emulsified Asphalt CRS2
Marathon Ashland
$ 0.7390
0.75
-1.47%
7
Gal.
Emulsified Tack Oil
Bituminous Roadways
$ 26.00
24.00
8.33%
8
Crack Joint Sealer
Bar en
$ 0.332
0.35
-5.14%
9A
H drofluosilicic Acid
DPC Industries
$ 9.03
9.55
-5.45%
9B
H drofluosilicic Acid
DPC Industries
$ 9.03
9.55
-5.45%
10
Liquid Chlorine
DPC Industries
$ 36.20
32.33
11.97%
11
Pol
Water Treatment Chemical (Poly)'
DPC Industries
$ 4.35
5.25
- 17.14%
12
Caustic Soda
DPC Industries
$ 28.06
53.00
- 47.06%
13 A,B & C
14
Jbidders
Manhole Covers - Complete Castin
Red Ball Aggregate
Ess Brothers & Sons, Inc.
B an Rock
$ 764.00
$ 15.72
705.00
14.87
8.37%
5.72%
15
Lannon Stone Wall Repair
Bork Stone
$ 16.25
16.25
0.00%
e items are awarded on basis of total cost
er ton incl. truckin & labor and
ast e
a summation of bids taken for commodities used b Public Works and Parks. T icall , there are one to four
on each item. The as halt bids are alwa s awarded with an alternate lant site sin le asterisk because of
ed to continue using asphalt during the summer and plar' -rloading or shut down does occur every summer.
TO: Mayor & City Council
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, City Engineer
VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
DATE: April 5, 2005
AGENDA ITEM III. F.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Contract No. ENG 05 -1, Valley View Road Lighting Project,
Improvement No. L -42.
Company
1. LPD Electric, Inc.
2. Killmer Electric
3. Quality Underground
4. Vinco, Inc.
5. Electrical Installation
6. Collins Electrical Systems
7. Granite Ledge Electrical
8. Egan Companies
9. Honda Electric
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
LPD Electric, Inc.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Amount of Quote or Bid
$ 97,160.00
$ 98,965.00
$ 114,290.00
$ 114,565.00
$ 116,947.00
$ 118,000.00
$ 123,500.00
$ 125,749.00
$ 139,700.00
$ 97,160.00
This project is for decorative pedestrian streetlights along Valley View Road from TH62 to
Wooddale Avenue. A project hearing was held on April 7, 2004, that included the streetlights
with the roadway project. This segment of the Wooddale Avenue / Valley View Road project is
the final phase and is scheduled to resume construction late April. This project will be funded
using Municipal State Aid System funds and special assessments. The Engineer's estimate is
$131,000.00. Staff recommends awarding this project to LPD Electric.
Signature
The Recommended Bid is
within budget not withi
Public Works - Engineering
Hughes, City
Director
REPORURECOMMENDATION
To:
Mayor & City Council
From:
s-;-Steven L. Lillehaug, PE, PTOE
Information Only
Traffic Engineer
Date:
April 5, 2005
Subject:
Adoption of the Transportation
Action
Commission Policy
Agenda Item #
W.A.
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑ To HRA
® To Council
Action
® Motion
® Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Adopt the City of Edina Transportation Commission Policy dated April 2005.
Info /Background:
The City Council held a public hearing on March 1, 2005 to take public comment on the
final draft of the Transportation Commission Policy. After two work sessions with the
City Council and Transportation Commission, a revised version of the final draft has
been completed and is being presented to the City Council for further consideration
(see attached).
G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure\ Streets\ Traffic \Transportation Commission\Agendas \report- recommendations\rr to CC 4- 5-05.doc
CITY OF EDINA
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION POLICY
49j
O��
April 2005
•
•
-Edina Transportation Commission recommended the FINAL
DRAFT on January 6, 2005 for City Council consideration.
-Edina City Council action taken on
{
CITY OF EDINA
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION POLICY
April 2005
Contributors:
Mayor & City Council
Mayor James Hovland
Councilmember Scot Housh
Councilmember Alice Hulbert
Councilmemeber Linda Masica
Councilmember Ann Swenson
Transportation Commission
Joni Kelly Bennett
Dean Dovolis
Warren Plante
Fred Richards (Chair)
Marie Thorpe
Les Wanninger
Jean White
Steven L. Lillehaug, P.E., P.T.O.E., Traffic Engineer /Assistant Engineer
Wayne D. Houle, P.E., Public Works Director /City Engineer
City of Edina Engineering
City of Edina Transportation Policy i April 2005
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TitleSheet .......................................................................... ............................... i
Tableof Contents ............................................................... ............................... ii
I. INTRODUCTION 1
Background........................................................................ ............................... 1
Purpose.............................................................................. ............................... 1
Vision................................................................................. ............................... 1
II. POLICY FRAMEWORK
1
Introduction........................................................................ ............................... 1
City of Edina Transportation Commission Policy ............... ............................... 6
III. PLAN IMPLEMENTATION 6
Transportation Commission Policy Adoption ..................... ............................... 6
ActionPlan ......................................................................... ............................... 7
Sources of Funding ......................:..................................... ............................... 8
Plan Acceptance Requirements and Costs ........................ ............................... 8
IV. NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLANS ("NTMP ") 8
Introduction........................................................................ ............................... 8
Process and Schedule ....................................................... ............................... 9
NTMPProcess ................................................................. ............................... 10
Criteria for Screening .................................................... ............................... 13
Scoringfor Ranking .......................................................... ............................... 14
Removal of Traffic Management Devices /Measures ....... ............................... 15
Traffic Management Devices /Measures — City of Edina Approved Options.... 16
Benefited Area (Assessed Area) ......................................... .............................17
APPENDICES
Appendix A — Definitions
Appendix B — Traffic Management Devices / Measures
Appendix C — Application Request for Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan
Appendix D — Acknowledgments and References
Appendix E — Functional Classification Road Map
City of Edina Transportation Policy ii April 2005
I. INTRODUCTION
BACKGROUND
Sustaining, improving and operating a sound street and transportation system are integral
parts of the long -term vision of the City. Congestion on the regional roadway system and
the failure of that system to accommodate the continued growth in traffic volumes has
both created and exacerbated traffic volumes, speed and congestion on local streets.
These conditions adversely affect the quality of life of the City's residents and the
activities of the businesses located in the City.
The Edina City Council in December 2003 established the Transportation Commission to
address these issues and to work to improve the local transportation system, consistent
with the Comprehensive Plan and Vision 20/20.
PURPOSE
The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) was established to advise the Council on
matters relating to the operation of the local street system with respect to traffic volumes,
congestion, and functional classification, but not maintenance activities, of the City; to
review and comment on plans to enhance mass transit opportunities in the City; to
evaluate methods for traffic calming and other speed and volume mitigation measures and
to recommend their implementation where appropriate; and to review the findings of the
Local Traffic Task Force (2002 -2003) and offer recommendations for implementation of
those findings.
VISION
Edina will maintain a transportation system that will accommodate the efficient
movement of people and goods throughout the City while fostering safe and livable
neighborhoods and business areas connected by aesthetically beautiful, pedestrian and
bicycle friendly streets and pathways.
II. POLICY FRAMEWORK
INTRODUCTION
The Edina Transportation Commission Policy ( "Policy") was developed as a supplement
to the City of Edina Transportation Plan (March 1999). The purpose of the Policy is to
guide the ETC in the identification and evaluation of traffic and transportation issues in
the community and prioritize projects and improvements to the transportation system.
The Policy is created to encourage public input and decisions that will be based upon
objective and subjective factors.
City of Edina Transportation Policy 1 April 2005
CITY OF EDINA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION POLICY
The City of Edina Transportation Commission Policy implements the purposes and
objectives of the ETC as provided in Section, 1225 of the City Code (Transportation -
Commission). Except with respect to maintenance issues, the Policy also incorporates the
policies of the Transportation Plan as follows:
Roadway Design
1. Design roadway facilities constructed in conjunction with new developments
according to the intended function.
2. Upgrade existing roadways when warranted by demonstrated volume, safety or
functional needs, taking into consideration environmental limitations.
3. Emphasize improvements to management, maintenance and utilization of the
existing street and highway system.
4. Design residential street systems to discourage through traffic and to be compatible
with other transportation modes including transit; bicycle and walking, including
traffic calming measures on local streets and, in some cases, collector streets.
5. Use adequate transitions and buffers including, but not limited to, earth berms, walls,
landscaping and distance to mitigate the undesirable impact of high volume
roadways.
6. Promote use of sound mitigating features for residential development adjacent to
high volume roadways; and make property owners and land developers responsible
,for noise attenuation at new developments near high volume roadways.
Roadway Function and Access
1. Provide logical street networks to connect residential areas to the regional highway
system and local activity centers.
2. Adequately control access points to the regional roadway system (including minor
arterials) in terms of driveway openings and side street intersections.
3. Provide access to the local street system (including collector and local streets) in a
manner that balances the need to safely and efficiently operate the street system with
the need for access to land.
4. Encourage intra -area trips on minor arterials rather than the principal arterial system,
and promote serving regional trips on the metropolitan highway system.
City of Edina Transportation Policy 2 April 2005
r
l
5. Separate, to the extent possible, conflicting uses on the public street system in order
to minimize safety problems. Give special attention to pedestrian and bicycle routes.
6. Provide access to , redeveloping sites using current functional classification and
standards rather than the existing access at the sites.
Roadway Maintenance and Operation
1. Cooperate with other agencies having jurisdiction over streets and highways in Edina
to assure good roadway conditions and operating efficiency.
2. Continue the implementation of the I -494 frontage road system and Integrated
Corridor Traffic Management system through ongoing coordination with Mn/DOT,
Hennepin County, and the cities of Richfield and Bloomington.
3. Maintain roads by repairing weather- related and other damage.
4. Use economic and environmentally sound management techniques for snow and ice
removal.
5. Replace substandard bridges and bridges that present safety or traffic problems.
Transit/TDM
1. Participate in the I -494 Commission to encourage all forms of travel demand
management in order to reduce vehicle miles of travel, reduce petroleum
consumption, and improve air quality.
2. Review all major new developments in light of the potential for ridesharing including
bus accessibility, preferential parking for carpools/vanpools, and mixed -use
development.
3. Support HOV bypasses and other preferential treatments for transit and high
occupancy vehicles on streets and highways.
4. Include transit planning in the construction or upgrading of streets and highways.
5. Pursue development of a demonstration project to provide a circulator system within
the Greater Southdale Area.
Parking
1. Review new developments for adequacy of parking based upon need, the potential for
joint use of parking facilities and opportunities to encourage ridesharing.
2. Continue to limit on- street parking in and near congested commercial areas.
City of Edina Transportation Policy 3 April 2005
Y
Pedestrian /Bicycle
1. Provide accessibility to pedestrians and bicycles at major activity centers, including
necessary storage facilities.
2. Create pedestrian and bicycle interconnections among major generators, with
continuity across major roadways and other barriers.
3. Provide sidewalks and safe crossing in high pedestrian danger areas, including high -
traffic streets, commercial areas, areas with transit access, and in high- density
residential locations.
4. Provide adequate signage along all bike paths including areas of conflict with
pedestrians and automobile traffic.
Goods Movement
1. Serve major truck users and intermodal facilities with good minor arterial access to
the metropolitan highway system.
Funding and Jurisdiction
1. Pursue and support regional or multi - community funding sources for improvements
that provide regional or multi - community benefit.
2. Support research efforts into more efficient and cost - effective management,
maintenance and replacement of street surfaces.
3. Support governmental jurisdiction over roadways that reflect the role of the roadway
in the overall transportation system.
4. Develop and support legislation permitting a transportation utility.
In addition to the policies contained in the Transportation Plan, the Edina Transportation
Commission has adopted the following policies:
Roadway Design
1. Design collector and arterial roadway corridors to be compatible with other
transportation modes including transit, bicycle and pedestrian.
2. Encourage beautification of local corridors, where appropriate, with amenities such as
boulevard trees, decorative street lighting, and monuments.
City of Edina Transportation Policy 4 April 2005
r
Roadway Function and Access
3. Review and update regional and local functional street classification and coordinate
with adjacent cities and Hennepin County. Establish subcategory classifications and
criteria for local streets if warranted. Revise local roadway classifications when
warranted.
4. Review and monitor citywide traffic volumes, congestion, existing traffic calming
devices and measures, accident history, vehicle violation history, speed limits and
enforcement.
5. Educate public on vehicle operations including public relations campaigns that focus
on individual responsibilities to each other rather than individual rights.
6. Review and recommend traffic calming policies and consider traffic calming
implementation where requested by residents.
7. Implement measures to reduce non - local, cut - through traffic in cooperation with
County and State efforts by developing a local traffic calming policy to mitigate the
effects of cut - through traffic. Identify the origin and destination of cut - through
traffic.
8. In conjunction with the Planning Commission, review landuse that may impact traffic
implementations. Continue to monitor adjacent community redevelopment and other
activity that potentially impacts the City of Edina.
Transit/TDM
9. Encourage the legislature to both increase and establish a dedicated source for funding
for efficient mass transit. Review and recommend policies necessitating a
Transportation Demand Management and/or a mass transit component with all types
of development.
Parking
10. Find a location for an additional Park and Ride facility to be established in close
proximity to major mass transit routes.
11. Work with appropriate commissions such as Planning and Zoning to review City
Code, Section 850.08 Parking and Circulation to identify parking based upon needs.
12. Evaluate present City parking facilities. Where appropriate, amend Section 850 to
provide Transportation Demand Management and transit users some spaces in City-
owned ramps.
City of Edina Transportation Policy 5 April 2005
Pedestrian /Bicycle
13. Review and recommend construction of pedestrian and bike paths throughout Edina
cooperatively with the Three Rivers Park District and Hennepin County.
14. Promote safe walking, bicycling and driving. Promote vehicle driver respect for
bicycles and pedestrians along with bicyclists and pedestrian observance of signs and
use of designated paths for travel.
15. Support inclusion of pedestrian and bicycle access planning when upgrading
roadways, bridges and redevelopment projects.
III. PLAN IMPLEMENTATION
This section generally describes the steps necessary to implement the provisions of the
Policy and discusses a general strategy for carrying out the Policy provisions.
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION POLICY ADOPTION
By adopting the Transportation Commission Policy, the City Council establishes the
guidelines by which decisions regarding transportation facilities are made in Edina. It
should be revised as necessary to respond to changing conditions and needs, both locally
and regionally.
The Policy should be circulated widely so the residents and the business community are
aware of the opportunities and limitations that the Policy provides, thus enabling all
interested parties to voice their concerns and issues with full knowledge of the process.
ACTION PLAN
Short Term (Immediate):
Review and approve Transportation Commission Policy:
o Review and identify problems and causes of Edina traffic issues
(determine what is fact versus perception).
o Review volume and speed criteria.
o Present Draft Policy to Council.
• Open public comment period.
• Recommend to Council for approval.
• Review Local Traffic Task Force Findings and Recommendations as it reflects the
adoptive policies and procedures. Rank the six Local Traffic Task Force
identified traffic "issue areas" and review and recommend action for them as
Neighborhood Traffic Management Projects to the City Council.
• Review and approve a Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan (NTMP).
City of Edina Transportation Policy 6 April 2005
• Publicize transportation issues to be studied by ETC.
• Establish a means for public communication for transportation issues including, as
appropriate:
o City of Edina Website
o About Town
o Edina Community Channel 16
o Edina Sun Current Newspaper
o Local Schools
o E -mails to Neighborhood Associations
o Utility Bill
o City Hall's Electronic Billboard
• Create a citizen's guide to transportation issues
Long Term (Continually):
• Review and recommend Neighborhood Traffic Management Plans.
• Review and update local roadway functional classification.
• Hold yearly public open house for transportation issues.
• Review and update Transportation Commission Policy annually.
• Review and make recommendations for collector and arterial roadway planned
improvements.
SOURCES OF FUNDING
The following sources of funding are explained in more detail in the Transportation Plan.
Existing Sources of Revenue:
• Federal Surface Transportation Program Funds
• Congestion Management and Air Quality (CMAQ)
• State Aid
• Special Assessments
• Livable Communities Grants
• Ad Valorem Taxes
• Tax Increment Financing
Potential Sources of Revenue:
• Impact Fees
• Road Access Charges
• Transportation Utility
City of Edina Transportation Policy 7 April 2005
PLAN ACCEPTANCE REQUIREMENTS AND COSTS
Plan acceptance requirements include educating residents in the Benefited Area about the
possibility that they may be asked to fund the installation and maintenance of NTMP
Projects through additional taxes and/or special assessments. A typical project includes
all costs accrued for the improvement including all costs to perform the preliminary
studies and data collection, temporary test installations, final studies, final design and
actual construction costs. All costs associated with a Neighborhood Traffic Management
Plan study and project will be assessed to the Benefited Area if the Council approves the
project for final implementation.
IV.NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLANS ( "NTMP")
INTRODUCTION
Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan (NTMP) studies are intended to respond to
requests to deal with speeding and excessive volumes of traffic on streets in residential
neighborhoods and on multiple streets in one or more neighborhoods, yet are intended to
be sensitive to areas where, due to the implementation of calming measures, there may be
a potential for diversion of traffic onto other streets and/or into other neighborhoods.
These plans are required to respond to traffic problems that are symptomatic of wider
problems, such as congestion or lack of capacity on the arterial system.
NTMP studies include local, collector and arterial street studies and neighborhood area
studies. While solutions will be considered for collector and arterial streets, only a
limited number of management devices or measures will be allowed on collectors and
arterials due to State design standards and funding requirements (see Appendix B).
Studies will be conducted by the City Engineering Department with the involvement of
other City departments and upon the approval of the Transportation Commission and the
City Council. Studies will be scheduled based on available resources. Priority for studies
will be based upon factors that include, but are not limited to, the following:
• Previous efforts, requests and studies in the area
• Intensity and extent of the problems
• Degree of conflict between traffic conditions and land uses
• Availability of data
• Regional improvement projects scheduled or planned
• Feasibility of solutions
City of Edina Transportation Policy 8 April 2005
PROCESS AND SCHEDULE
This section generally details the process and schedule for Neighborhood Traffic
Management Plans (See Table 1).
Table 1. Nei hborhood Traffic Management Plans Schedule
Step
Item
Period (Typical)
-
General Traffic Management Information Open House
Late September
Step 1
Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan Applications
2nd Monday in
Due
February
Step 2
Initial Screening, Scoring and Ranking of Applications
March/April/May
Before data collection
Step 3
• Petition -to -study prepared and circulated by City staff
May /June
• Presentation to ETC for recommendation and to
Council for approval to order plan development
Step 4
Plan Development
June
• Review and comment by Fire, Police, Public Works
and Engineering, Transit and School (transportation)
agencies
• Public Open House
• Survey -to -test circulated and evaluated by City staff
• Trial Project Plan prepared
Step 5a
Presentation to ETC for recommendation
June
Step 5b
• Council approval of trial projects
July
• Schedule temporary installations, removals and after
data collection (minimum period of 2 weeks after
installation
St 5c
• Temporary installations
July/Au st
Step 6
• After data collection (trial projects)
September
• Review and comment by Fire, Police, Public Works,
Transit, and School (transportation) agencies
• Prepare evaluation summaries
Step 7a
Mail Surveys
October
Step 7b
• Summarize returned surveys
November
• Open House
Step 8a
Recommendations to ETC, Public comment
December
Step 8b
Recommendations to Council, Improvement Hearing,
January
Preliminary Assessment Hearing, Order Project
Step 9a
Survey and Design
February / March
Step 9b
Final approval of plans by Council, Set bid schedule
April
Step 9c
Letting, Assessment Hearing
May
Step 9d
Construction
June / July
Step 10
After data collection
July / August
Step 11
Follow-up Evaluation
Within 3 to 5 yrs
City of Edina Transportation Policy 9 April 2005
NTMP PROCESS:
Step 1. Study Request (Application)
A Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan (NTMP) study application can be filed by any
individual, a business or by a neighborhood organization. Applications to consider a
NTMP study must be in writing and are due by 4:30 p.m. on the second Monday in
February of each year. (See Appendix C for an NTMP application form).
Step 2. Preliminary Review and Priority Ranking
In response to each NTMP study application filed, City staff gathers and reviews
preliminary data including data related to volume, speed, accidents and other pertinent
safety information. City staff also applies the criteria for screening and ranking to
prioritize studies for trial and evaluation of a NTMP. The Engineering Department ranks
the studies based on the methodology outlined under "Scoring for Ranking" as defined
herein, and prioritizes the trial studies for ETC review.. The number of trial studies
depends on equipment and personnel availability. Some trial studies may be deferred if
not feasible due to conflicting construction, development in the area, county or, state
restrictions or other concerns.
Applications are subject to review by the Engineering Department for possible solutions
other than a NTMP study. If preliminary review indicates an immediate hazard to the
public exists, the City. may choose to address the described matter separately from 'the
NTMP process.
The City also notifies the ETC of the status of all ranked studies and asks for comments.
The City notifies all study requestors of the status of their request after the completion of
the Step 2 process.
A selected study is considered in the annual priority- ranking step for up to 3 years. If,
after 3 years, a study has not received a high enough priority to proceed, it is no longer
eligible for consideration. This time limitation ensures that the study request has not
become obsolete because of changing traffic conditions and/or new residents in the area.
The study requestor is notified when the 3 -year limit expires. A new request may
thereafter be made to re -enter the study in the NTMP process. Step 1 is then repeated to
obtain current information.
Step 3. Petition -to -Study
A petition -to -study shall be circulated within the defined study area (Benefited Area — see
page 17 and Appendix A -1) for all studies selected to proceed to Step 3.
The Transportation Commission establishes the Benefited Area, based on information
obtained in the Preliminary Review stage of the process (Step 2). At a minimum, this "area
City of Edina Transportation Policy 10 April 2005
is generally defined as those households and businesses fronting on the affected segments
of the Benefited Area.
The petition -to -study defines the issue and surveys the Benefited Area to determine if the
residents within the Benefited Area agree with the issue that has been requested to be
addressed. City staff prepares the petition, describing the issue and the procedures to be
followed if a study is undertaken. The City then circulates the petition -to- study. Each
household is entitled to one signature. Property owners not living in the Benefited Area
are not included in the petition -to -study process. In order to proceed further, a minimum
of 51% of all petitions -to -study must be returned with 65% of those returned indicating
agreement to study the identified issue.
Qualifying petitions -to -study and the underlying NTMP applications are thereafter
presented to the ETC and the City Council. The ETC must recommend and the City
Council must order the plan development for the study to move to Step 4.
Step 4. Plan Development
Based on approval from the Council, the NTMP study is commenced. The NTMP is
initially reviewed by the City's Fire, Police, Public Works, Planning and Engineering
Departments, and by transportation agencies, including transit agencies, and the school
district.
The ETC then provides notice to the Impacted Area (as defined herein) and holds a public
meeting for the Impacted Area and the general public to inform residents of the proposed
project, to describe the NTMP process, and to gather additional information about the
study issue and related concerns within the Impacted Area.
Plan development consists of the following:
(a) Assessment of study issues and concerns
(b) Identification of project goals and objectives
(c) Identification of evaluation criteria
(d) Establishment of threshold criteria (on project -by- project basis)
(e) Development of alternative plans /solutions
Steps 4(a) and (b) are accomplished through public meetings, neighborhood association
meetings, and ETC meetings. Steps (c) through (f) are determined by City staff and the
ETC. Additionally, City staff prepares a survey -to -test describing the proposed project
and calling for a temporary test installation. Staff then circulates by U.S. Mail the survey -
to- test within the Impacted Area.
Each household and business within the Impacted Area is entitled to file one survey
response. The survey responses are evaluated by City staff. Possible criteria, solutions
and their impacts are proposed based on the citizen responses and sound engineering
City of Edina Transportation Policy 11 April 2005
principles and are evaluated by the ETC, City staff and other affected agencies. Based
upon that evaluation, a trial installation plan is prepared.
Step 5. Test Installation
The proposed NTMP test installation plan is presented to the ETC and the City Council.
If recommended by the ETC and approved by Council, the test will be installed for a trial
period of between 3 and 12 months. If the City Traffic Engineer finds that an unforeseen
hazard is created by the test installation, the test installation may be modified or removed.
Step 6. Project Evaluation
Following the test period, the City evaluates the performance of the test NTMP in terms
of the previously defined study issues and objectives. The evaluation includes the subject
street and other streets affected by the project, and is based on before - and -after speeds
and volumes, impacts on emergency vehicles or commercial uses, and other evaluation
criteria determined during Step 4. If, in the evaluation, measurable improvements are not
met to the satisfaction of the ETC and City staff, the NTMP may be modified and
additional testing conducted.
The test results are thereafter reviewed with the ETC, Impacted Area, and relevant City
staff, and the information is distributed during the survey stage.
The City will not proceed to Step 7 if the test results show the NTMP may be unsafe or
otherwise violates the Policy or other relevant City policies or regulations.
Step 7. Survey
To forward the project to the stage where permanent implementation is approved (Step
8), a survey from households, businesses and non - resident property owners within the
Impacted Area is obtained through a mail survey administered by the City. The ETC then
holds an open house for the Impacted Area to update residents about the proposed project.
Step 8. City Council Action
Based on the project evaluation and survey, City staff members prepare a feasibility
report and recommendations for the ETC and City Council. The report outlines the
process followed, includes the project findings, states the reasons for the
recommendations and includes a preliminary assessment roll. The feasibility report and
preliminary assessment roll will be presented for a recommendation by the ETC before
final action by the City Council. If the feasibility report is adopted and the preliminary
assessment roll is approved by the City Council, the project is ordered.
If the feasibility report and preliminary assessment roll are not adopted by the Council,
the plans and specifications will not be ordered and the project will be terminated. The
City of Edina Transportation Policy 12 April 2005
project will thereafter be removed from the list and the Benefited Area is not allowed to
reapply for a same or similar study for five years.
Step 9. Design, Final Assessment Roll and Construction
Final design and construction supervision are administered by the City and are generally
completed within 12 months after final approval and assessment by the City Council.
City staff prepares and recommends the final assessment roll as required under authority
granted by Minnesota Statute Chapter 429
Step 10. Monitoring
City staff shall monitor the NTMP and gather data, including volume, speed and accident
information for use in its follow -up evaluation.
Step 11. Follow -up Evaluation
Within the 3 to 5 year period following construction of an NTMP project, the City shall
conduct a follow -up evaluation to determine if the project's goals and objectives continue
to be met. This evaluation may entail traffic studies of volumes, speeds and accidents, as
well as public opinion surveys. The follow -up evaluation will be conducted by City staff
and presented to the ETC.
CRITERIA FOR SCREENING
Each NTMP study application is initially reviewed and screened for general qualification
for this process. The following prescribes the general criteria used by staff to determine
the eligibility for a NTMP study:
1. Roadway Classifications
• Eligible: All Edina streets under the Public Works Department jurisdiction.
• Not Eligible: All roadways within Edina designated as County, State, or
Federal Highways.
2. Minimum Distance of the traffic calming device from the following (all must
apply for eligibility):
• Traffic Signals (except neckdowns) 300 ft.
• Stop Signs (except neckdowns) 300 ft.
• Other Traffic Calming Devices or Measures 300 ft.
• Driveway /Alleys 20 ft.
• Horizontal or Vertical Curves affecting sight lines 200 ft.
• Railroad Crossing 300 ft.
• Dead End 400 ft.
City of Edina Transportation Policy 13 April 2005
I
3. Access:
• No dead -end created without adequate turn around on public roadway right -of-
way roadway.
4. Not - Critical Emergency Route:
• To be reviewed and approved by the City Fire Chief.
All four eligibility requirements must be met for scoring and consideration.
SCORING FOR RANKING
The following criteria defines the scoring for ranking that is used to prioritize a requested
NTMP study applicaton as described in Step 2 of the NTMP process:
1. Sidewalk adjacent to the benefited area (0 to100 points):
• None + 100
• All of 1 side + 50
• All of 2 sides + 0
2. Public school yard, play lot, playground development adjacent to benefited
area (0 to 200 points):
• None + 0
• All of 1 side + 100
• All of 2 sides + 200
3. Residential development adjacent to benefited area (0 to 100 points):
• None + 0
• All of 1 side + 50
• All of 2 sides + 100
4. Number of reported correctable crashes based on last 5 years of available
data (0 to 200 points):
• 20 per crash; maximum of 200 points
5. Average residential density adjacent to benefited area (0 to 50 points):
• 50 points maximum
• (0 dwelling units per adjacent 100 lin. ft. = 0 points
• 5+ dwelling units per adjacent 100 lin. ft. = 50 points)
City of Edina Transportation Policy 14 April 2005
6. Average Daily Traffic Volumes - ADT (0 to 200 points):
• ADT divided by 10; maximum 200 points
• For intersection, street segments or multiple streets, use higher volume street
7. Percent over speed limit - ADT (0 to 200 points):
• Percent over speed limit times 2.5 (times 100); maximum 200 points (80%
over limit)
• For intersection, street segments or multiple streets, use street with higher
speeds
Scoring is based on the criteria pertaining to the Benefited Area. Correctable crashes are
determined by the Engineering Department.
REMOVAL OF TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT DEVICES /MEASURES
The City of Edina's Traffic Calming program is intended to avoid the costly installation
and later costly removal of traffic calming devices and measures. On occasion, however,
it may be determined to be desirable to terminate the NTMP. .
If the removal is City initiated due to safety/crash issues, the removal will be at City
expense. If the removal is at the request of the Benefited Area, the removal will be
charged to the property owners in the defined Benefited Area. The following procedure
will be used for removals initiated by the Benefited Area:
1. Petition requesting removal is submitted to the City Traffic Engineer.
2. A survey, including estimated cost for removal and data collected previously for the
NTW, is mailed to each property owner in the Benefited Area.
3. Surveys are summarized 30 days after mailing. Staff makes recommendation to the
ETC.
4. ETC forwards a recommendation to the Council. If the recommendation is for
removal, improvement and assessment hearings are scheduled by the Council with
notice to the Benefited Area.
5. Final approval of plans by Council. Set bid schedule.
6. Letting, final assessment and construction.
7. A new NTMP will not be considered for five years following the removal of a NTM P
in the Benefited Area.
City of Edina Transportation Policy 15 April 2005
TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT DEVICES /MEASURES — CITY OF EDINA APPROVED OPTIONS
This section lists traffic management devices and measures that are approved for use in
the City of Edina. Appendix B contains a detailed description and overview of each item.
Speed Reduction Traffic Calming Measures:
• Speed Hump
• Speed Table
• Raised Crosswalk
• Raised Intersection
• Textured Pavements
• Center Island Narrowings
• Gateway Treatments
• Neckdowns
• Choker
• Chicane
• Realigned Intersections
• Traffic Circle
• Roundabout
Volume Reduction Traffic Calming Measures:
• Diagonal Road Closure
• Partial Street Closure
• Cul -de -sac
• Median Barriers
• Forced Turn Islands
Education and Enforcement:
• Targeted Police Enforcement
• Radar Speed Display Units
• Neighborhood Traffic Safety Campaigns
Regulatory Measures:
• Stop Sign
• Turn Restrictions
• One Way Streets
• Traffic Signals ( "Rest on Red" and "Rest on Green ")
• Pavement Striping (Centerline, Edge and Transverse)
City of Edina Transportation Policy 16 April 2005
BENEFITED AREA (ASSESSED AREA)
This section generally defines the Benefited Area of the traffic management devices and
measures for use in determining the assessment area. The following prescribes the typical
Benefited Area, but may be adjusted by the ETC on a project -by- project basis.
Speed Hump, Speed Table, Raised Intersection, Raised Crosswalk,
Textured Pavement, Center Island Narrowings, Neckdowns, Gateway
Treatments, Choker, Chicane, Traffic Circle:
• Benefited Area extends 300 feet from the device along the street affected by the
device, or to the nearest stop sign or traffic signal, whichever is less.
Diagonal Road Closure, Round -a -bout:
• Benefited Area extends to the next intersection on each leg of the
intersection.
Partial Street Closure, Realigned Intersection, Forced Turn Island, Median
Barrier:
• Benefited Area extends to the next intersection on the leg of the
intersection partially closed, realigned or restricted.
Cul -De -Sac:
• Benefited Area extends from the point of closure to the next intersection
on the leg that is closed.
uity of Edma 'Transportation Policy 17 April 2005
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A — DEFINITIONS
APPENDIX B — TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT DEVICES / MEASURES
APPENDIX C — APPLICATION REQUEST FOR NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT
PLAN
APPENDIX D — ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND REFERENCES
APPENDIX E — FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION ROAD MAP
Ulty 01 Edm 'Transportation Policy April 2005
APPENDIX A - DEFINITIONS
t-iry of rain i ransportation Policy April 2005
Definitions
Benefited Area — The properties expected to receive the majority of the positive impacts
from the proposed traffic calming strategy and which are subject to assessment for the
cost of installation or removal of a NTMP improvements. (Assessed Area)
Center Island Narrowings — An island or barrier in the center of a street that serves to
segregate traffic. (Midblock medians, median slowpoints, median chokers, central
islands.)
Chicane — Mainline deviations to deter the path of travel so that the street is not a straight
line (by the installation of offset curb extensions). (Deviations, serpentines, reversing
curves, twists.)
Choker — Physical street narrowing to expand sidewalks and landscaped areas; possibly
adding medians, on street parking, etc. (Pinch points, lane narrowing; midblock
narrowings, midblock yield points, constrictions.)
Circulator Service — A means provided within a major activity center, (such as a
regional business concentration, a metro center or community) for movement from place
to place within the center; such a system may be entirely pedestrian or may use transit.
Collector Street — Roadways that are designated to "collect' traffic from neighborhood
streets and get that traffic to arterial streets. Collector streets are described in the City of
Edina Comprehensive Plan.
Corridor Studies — Typically, highway corridor studies focus on a segment of a
particular travel corridor or travel shed. Land use, access issues, capacity, level of
service, geometries and safety concerns are studied; alternatives analyzed; and
recommendations made. Corridor studies are usually prepared with the participation and
cooperation of the affected communities and governmental agencies. Recommendations
for improvements are often incorporated into the local comprehensive plans of the
participating cities and continue to be used by implementing agencies as improvements in
the corridor are made.
Cul- de-sac — Physical street closure resulting in a dead end (no outlet) constructed with a
circular turn- around area.
Cut - through Traffic — Traffic that intrudes into a residential subdivision to avoid
congestion or other problem from an arterial or other high level street.
Diagonal Road Closures — A barrier placed diagonally across a four- legged intersection,
interrupting traffic flow across the intersection. This type of barrier may be used to create
a maze -like effect in a neighborhood. (Diagonal diverter.)
City of Edina Transportation Policy A -1 April 2005
Feasibility Report — A report analyzing the recommended type of construction, the
estimated construction cost, estimated engineering cost and the estimated assessment.
Forced Turn Islands — Small traffic islands installed at intersections to channel turning
movements. (Forced turn barriers, diverters.)
Functional Classification (of Roadways) — In accordance with the City of Edina
Transportation Plan (March 1999), the City has adopted the Metropolitan Council's
functional classification system designation and guidelines for use in the City's roadway
system. Functional classification involves determining what role each roadway should
perform and ensures that certain transportation and non - transportation factors are taken
into account in the planning and design of roadways. A complete description of the
functional classification system criteria is found in Appendix D of the Transportation
Plan (March 1999). The following criteria lists typical vehicle volumes carried on
roadways:
Principal Arterials: 15,000 to 200,000 vehicles per day
Minor Arterials: 5,000 to 30,000 vehicles per day
Collector Streets: 1,000 to 15,000 vehicles per day
Local Streets: Less than 1,000 vehicles per day
Gateway Treatment — Treatment to a street that includes a sign, banner, landscaping or
other structure that helps to communicate a sense of neighborhood identity.
Guide Signs — A sign that shows route designations, destinations, directions, distances,
services, points of interest, or other geographical, recreational, or cultural information. .
Impacted Area - Area for a project that is defined as those residences along local
residential streets that are positively or negatively impacted by excessive through traffic
volumes and speeding, or that may be positively or negatively impacted by proposed
traffic calming.
Infrastructure — Fixed facilities, such as roadways or railroad tracks; permanent
structures.
Level of Service (as related to highways) — The different operating conditions that
occur on a lane or roadway when accommodating various traffic volumes. It is a
qualitative measure of the effect of traffic flow factors, such as speed and travel time,
interruption, freedom to maneuver, driver comfort and convenience, and indirectly, safety
and operating costs. It is expressed as levels of service "A" through "F." Level "A" is a
condition of free traffic flow where there is little or no . restriction in speed or
maneuverability caused by presence of other vehicles. Level "F" is forced -flow operation
at low speed with many stoppages, the highway acting as a storage area.
Local Street — A roadway that connects blocks within neighborhoods.
City of Edina Transportation Policy A -2 April 2005
Local Traffic — Traffic that originates from or is destined to a location within a
neighborhood or area.
Major Street — The street normally carrying the higher volume of vehicular traffic (vs.
Minor Street).
Median Barriers — Raised island or barrier in the center of the street that serves to
segregate traffic.
Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) — The portion of the metropolitan area
identified in the Regional Blueprint where development and redevelopment is to occur
and in which urban facilities and services are to be provided. The purpose of the MUSA
is to define the areas within the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area that are eligible for "urban
services ", specifically sewers, municipal water systems and particular types of
transportation systems. This boundary line is defined and maintained by the Metropolitan
Council to assist in the orderly development of the metropolitan area. All of Edina is
within the MUSA area.
"A" Minor Arterials — Roadways within the metropolitan area that are more regionally
significant than others. These roadways are classified into the following groups:
a) Relievers — Minor arterials that provide direct relief for traffic on major
metropolitan highways. These roads include the closest routes parallel to the
principal arterials within the core, urban reserve and urban staging areas.
These roadways are proposed to accommodate medium - length trips (less than
eight miles) as well as to provide relief to congested principal arterials.
Improvements focus on providing additional capacity for through traffic.
b) Expanders — Routes that provide a way to make connections between
developing areas outside the interstate ring or beltway. These routes are
located circumferentially beyond the area reasonably served by the beltway.
These roadways are proposed to serve medium to long suburb -to- suburb trips.
Improvements focus on preserving or obtaining right -of -way.
c) Connectors — This subgroup of "A" minor arterials are those roads that would
provide good, safe connections among town centers in the urban reserve, urban
staging and rural areas within and near the seven counties. Improvements
focus on safety and load - carrying capacity.
d) Augmenters — The fourth group of "A" minor arterials are those roads that
augment principal arterials within the interstate ring or beltway. The principal
arterial network in this area is in place. However, the network of principal
arterials serving the area is not in all cases sufficient relative to the density of
development that the network serves. In these situations, these key minor
arterials serve many long -range trips. Improvements focus on providing
additional capacity for through traffic.
City of Edina Transportation Policy A -3 April 2005
Minor Street — The street normally carrying the lower volume of vehicular traffic (vs.
Major Street).
Municipal State Aid (MSA) Route — A designated City roadway that receives state
funds as allocated from the State gas tax for maintenance and construction.
Approximately 20 percent of the City roadways are designated as MSA routes. State of
Minnesota rules and standards, in addition to local jurisdiction guidelines, apply to these
roadways.
Neckdowns — Physical curb reduction of road width at intersections. Similar to lane
narrowing but used at intersection(s). Widening of street corners at intersections to
discourage cut - through traffic, to improve pedestrian access and to help define
neighborhoods. (Nubs, bulb -outs, knuckles, intersection narrowings, corner bulges, safe
crosses.)
Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan (NTMP) — Formalized process where
residents, commissioners and City staff evaluate the various requirements, benefits and
tradeoffs of traffic calming projects within neighborhoods. The overall objectives for the
Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan are to improve neighborhood livability by
mitigating the impact of vehicular traffic on residential neighborhoods; to promote safe
and pleasant conditions for motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and residents on
neighborhood streets; to encourage citizen involvement and effort in neighborhood traffic
management activities; to make efficient use of City resources by prioritizing traffic
management requests; and to support the Comprehensive Plan policy that livability and
safety of established residential neighborhoods be protected in transportation operations.
Non -Local Traffic — Traffic that does not originate from or is not destined to a location
within a neighborhood or area.
Off -Peak Period — Time of day outside the peak period (see peak period)
Partial Street Closure — Physical blockage of one direction of traffic on a two -way
street. The open lane of traffic is signed "One way", and traffic from the blocked lane is
not allowed to go around the barrier through the open lane. (Half closure.)
Peak Hour — The hour during the peak period when travel demand is highest. Typically,
peak hours are found to be from 7 to 8 a.m. and from 4:30 to 5:30 p.m.
Peak Period — Typically, the time between 6:30 and 9:00 a.m. and between 3:30 and 6
p.m. on a weekday, when traffic is usually heavy.
Person Trip — A one -way journey between two points by one person in a vehicle.
Photo -radar Speed Enforcement — An automated camera system used to enforce speed
limits. It includes the camera, an attached radar "gun" and a display that shows the speed
of each passing vehicle. When a speeding vehicle is detected, the photo radar system
City of Edina Transportation Policy A-4 April 2005
takes a picture of the driver and the license plate. The registered owner of the vehicle then
receives a ticket in the mail. This enforcement method is not legal in Minnesota.
Photo -Red Light Enforcement — Implementation of a photo red light, an automated
camera and computer system can be mounted on a traffic signal pole at an intersection for
red light enforcement. Photo red light takes pictures of any vehicles that run a red light,
records the time elapsed since the light turned red and the vehicle entered the intersection,
and issues a ticket. The photo red light systems are typically installed at key intersections
that have a high number of accidents. This enforcement method is not legal in
Minnesota.
Platoon — A group of vehicles or pedestrians traveling together as a group, either
voluntarily or involuntarily because of traffic signal controls, geometrics, or other factors.
Principal Arterials — The high capacity highways that make up the metropolitan
highway system, including all interstate freeways.
Radar Speed Display Units — Driver feedback signs that use radar to provide motorists
with an instant message, displayed on a reader board, telling them how fast they are
driving.
Raised Crosswalk — A speed table designed as a pedestrian crossing, generally used at
mid -block locations. (Raised crossings, sidewalk extensions.)
Raised Intersection — A raised plateau where roads intersect. The plateau is generally 4"
above the surrounding street. (Raised junctions, intersection humps, plateaus.)
Realigned Intersections — Physical realignment of intersection typically used to promote
better through movements for a major roadway (vs. a minor roadway). (Modified
intersections.)
Regional Blueprint — The Metropolitan Council plan that sets a general direction for
future development patterns in the metropolitan area and establishes guidelines for
making decisions about major regional facilities that are needed to support the
commercial, industrial and residential development of the area. It establishes urban and
rural areas and certain development policies for different geographic policy areas.
Regulatory Signs — A sign that gives notice to road users of traffic laws or regulations.
Right -of -Way (Assignment) — The permitting of vehicles and/or pedestrians to proceed
in a lawful manner in preference to other vehicles or pedestrians by the display of sign or
signal indications.
Roadway striping — Highlighting various areas of the road to increase the driver's
awareness of certain conditions (e.g., edge of road striping to create a narrowing/slowing
effect while defining space for cyclists).
City of Edina Transportation Policy A -5 April 2005
Roundabout — Raised circular areas (similar to medians) placed at intersections. Drivers
travel in a counterclockwise direction around the circle. Modern roundabouts are `yield
upon entry", meaning that cars in the circle have the right of way and cars entering the
circle must wait to do so until the path is clear. When a roundabout is placed in an
intersection, vehicles may not travel in a straight line. (Rotaries.)
Signal Preemption — Usually- referred to in this plan as a technology that triggers the
green go -ahead on meters or signal lights to allow emergency vehicles (and sometimes
transit vehicles) to move more quickly through signalized intersections.
Speed— Speed is defined based on the following classifications:
a) Advisory Speed — A recommended speed for all vehicles operating on a
section of highway and based on the highway design, operating
characteristics, and conditions.
b) Design Speed — A selected speed used to determine the various geometric
design features of a roadway.
c) 85th- Pereentile Speed — The speed at or below which 85 percent of the
motorized vehicles travel.
d) Posted Speed — The speed limit determined by law and shown on Speed
Limit signs.
e) Statutory Speed — A speed limit established by legislative action that
typically is applicable for highways with specified design, functional,
jurisdictional and/or location characteristic and is not necessarily shown
on Speed Limit signs.
Speed Hump —Wave- shaped paved humps in the street. The height of the speed hump
determines how fast it may be navigated without causing discomfort to the driver or
damage to the vehicle. Discomfort increases as speed over the hump increases. Typically
speed humps are placed in a series rather than singularly. (Road humps, undulations.)
Speed Limit —The maximum (or minimum) speed applicable to a section of highway or
roadway as established by law.
Speed Table — Trapezoidal shaped speed humps in the street, similar to speed humps.
(Trapezoidal humps, speed platforms.)
Speed Zone — A section of highway with a speed limit that is established by law but
which may be different from a legislatively specified statutory speed limit.
Street Closure — Street closed to motor vehicles using planters, bollards, or barriers, etc.
City of Edina Transportation Policy A -6 April 2005
Targeted Police Enforcement — Specific monitoring of speeding and other violations by
police due to observed, frequent law disobedience.
Textured Pavements — A change in pavement texture (e.g., asphalt road to brick
crossing) that helps to make drivers aware of a change in the driving environment.
Traffic Calming — A combination of mainly physical measures that reduce the negative
effects of motor vehicle use, alter driver behavior and improve conditions for non-
motorized street users. Traffic calming involves changes in street alignment, installation
of barriers, and other physical measures to reduce traffic speeds and cut - through volumes
in the interest of street safety, livability and other public purposes. Traffic calming
measures are intended to be self - enforcing. Traffic calming measures rely on the laws of
physics rather than human psychology to slow down traffic.
Traffic Circle — Circular, raised island placed within the middle of intersections,
requiring vehicles to divert around them, potentially forcing drivers to slow down as they
traverse around the circle. (Intersection islands, similar to roundabouts.)
Traffic Signal Control Systems — The degree of traffic management of an arterial is
grouped and defined as follows:
a) Fixed Time — The traffic signals on an arterial are controlled locally through a
time clock system. In general, the progression of a through band (the amount
of green time available along an arterial at a given speed) along the arterial in
the peak direction is determined by past experience and is not a function of
immediate traffic demand.
b) Semi - actuated — The traffic signals along the arterial are designed to
maximize the green time on the major route in the major direction. Timing and
through band are based upon historical records. Use of green time on the
minor leg dependent upon real -time demand and maximized based upon total
intersection delay.
c) Interconnection — A traffic signal system in which data collected at individual
signals is shared with a central processor or controller. Adjustments in traffic
signal control can be made based upon incoming data as opposed to historical
data.
d) Optimization — The process in which a traffic signal or system is modified to
maximize the amount of vehicles passing through the intersection for all
approaches or on the major road in the peak direction.
e) Real -time Adaptive Control — An advanced traffic control system that
incorporates current technologies in communications, data analysis, and traffic
monitoring to provide real -time traffic control of arterials, corridors or roadway
networks.
City of Edina Transportation Policy A -7 April 2005
Transportation Comprehensive Plan — Assists the City in making correct
transportation- related decisions today by anticipating the character, magnitude and timing
of future transportation demand.
Transportation Demand Management (TDM) — Programs and methods to reduce
effective demand. In the broadest sense, any activity or facility that reduces vehicle trips
would fall within this classification. The highest priority in the region is given to
reducing single- occupant vehicle trips in the peak periods. Techniques that might be
utilized are carpooling, vanpooling, transit, alternative work hours, transportation
management organizations, and land development or ordinances that discourage vehicle
trips and encourage walk, bike, rideshare and transit trips.
Transportation Policy Plan - This document is one chapter of the Metropolitan
Development Guide, as provided for in Minnesota Stat. 473, Sections 145 and 146.
Section 145 states: "The Metropolitan Council shall prepare and adopt ... a comprehensive
development guide for the metropolitan area."
Vehicle Trip — A one -way journey made by an auto, truck or bus to convey people or
goods.
Volume -to- capacity Ratio (v /c) — The hourly number of vehicles expected to use a
roadway in the busiest hour, divided by the number of moving vehicles the roadway can
safely accommodate in an hour.
Warning Signs — A sign that gives notice to road users of a situation that might not be
readily apparent.
City of Edina Transportation Policy A -8 April 2005
APPENDIX B - TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT DEVICES /MEASURES
City of Edina Transportation Policy April 2005
TRAFFIC MANAGMENT DEVICES /MEASURES
(Not in priority order)
City of EdinaTransportation Policy B -1 April 2005
TRAFFIC
PAGE
MANAGEMENT
SPEED
TRAFFIC
FUEL
AIR/NOISE
EMERGENCY
TEST VS.
NO.
DEVICE/MEASURE
REDUCTION
REDUCTION
CONSUMPTION
POLLUTION
COST
SERVICES
PERMANENT
OTHER
B-4
Speed Hump
Probable
Possible
Small Increase
Small Increase
Low
Possible
Test Installation
Not used on
Increased
Possible
Collector and
Response Time
Arterial Streets
B -5
Speed Table
Probable
Possible
Small Increase
Small Increase
Low
Possible
Test Installation
Not used on
Increased
Possible
Collector and
Response Time
Arterial Streets
B -6
Raised Crosswalk
Possible
Possible
Small Increase
Small Increase
Low
Possible
Test Installation
Not used on
Increased
Possible
Collector and
Response Time
Arterial Streets
B -7
Raised Intersection
Probable
Possible
Small Increase
Small Increase
Medium
Possible
Permanent
Possible Drainage
to High
Increased
Installation Only
Problem
Response Time
B-8
Textured Pavement
Possible
No Effect
No Change
Minimal Effect
Low to
Minimal Impact
Permanent
Increased
Medium
Installation Only
Maintenance
B -9
Center Island
Possible
Possible
No Effect
No Effect
Medium
Minimal Impact
Test Installation
Narrowings
Possible
B -10
Neckdowns
Possible
Possible
Small Increase
Small Increase
Medium
Minimal Impact
Test Installation
to High
Possible
B -11
Gateway Treatment
Possible
Possible
No Change
Small Decrease
Medium
Minimal Impact
Permanent
Increased
to High
Installation Only
Maintenance
B -12
Choker
Probable
Possible
Small Increase
Small Increase
Medium
Minimal Impact
Test Installation
Possible
B -13
Chicane
Probable
Possible
Slight Increase
Slight Increase
Medium
Minimal Impact
Test Installation
Not used on
to High
Possible
Collector and
Arterial Streets
B -14
Realigned Intersection
Varies
Varies
Small Decrease
Small Decrease
High
Varies
Permanent
Installation Only
City of EdinaTransportation Policy B -1 April 2005
TRAFFIC MANAGMENT DEVICES /MEASURES
(Not in priority order)
City of Edina iortation Policy B 1005
TRAFFIC
PAGE
MANAGEMENT
SPEED
TRAFFIC
FUEL
AIR/NOISE
EMERGENCY
TEST VS.
NO.
DEVICE/MEASURE
REDUCTION
REDUCTION
CONSUMPTION
POLLUTION
COST
SERVICES
PERMANENT
OTHER
B-15
Traffic Circle
Possible
Possible
Slight Increase
Small Increase
Medium
Possible
Test Installation
Not used on
Increased
Possible
Collector and
Response Time
Arterial Streets
B -16
Roundabout
Probable
Possible
No Effect
Slight Increase
Medium
Possible
Permanent
Increased
to High
Increased
Installation Only
Maintenance
Response Time
B -17
Diagonal Road
Probable
Probable
Small Increase
Small Increase
Low to
Varies
Test Installation
Not used on
Closures
Medium
Possible
Collector and
Arterial Streets ,
B -18
Partial Street Closure
Possible
Probable
Small Increase
Small Increase
Medium
Minimal Impact
Test Installation
Not used on
Possible
Collector and
Arterial Streets
B -19
Cul-de -sac
Probable
Yes
Small Increase
Small Increase
High
Possible
Test Installation
Not used on
Increased
Possible
Collector and
Response Time
Arterial Streets
B -20
Median Barriers
Small Possiblity
Possible
No Effect
No Effect
Varies
Possible
Test Installation _
Increased
Possible
Response Time
B -21
Forced Turn Islands
Possible
Possible
Small Increase
Small Increase
Low to
Possible
Test Installation
Not used on
Medium
Increased
Possible
Collector and
Response Time
Arterial Streets
B-22
Targeted Police
Depends on
Possible
No Effect
No Effect
High
No Effect
Temporary
Enforcement
Amount
B -23
Radar Speed Units
Probable
No Effect
No Effect
No Effect
Low
No Effect
Temporary or
Permanent
B -24
Neighborhood Traffic
Possible
No Effect
No Effect
No Effect
Low
No Effect
Temporary or
Safety Campaigns
Permanent
B -25
Stop Sign
Varies (may
Varies
Small Increase
Small Increase
Low
Possible
Temporary or
increase)
Increased
Permanent
Response Time
City of Edina iortation Policy B 1005
TRAFFIC MANAGMENT DEVICES /MEASURES
(Not in priority order)
City of EdinaTransportation Policy B -3 April 2005
TRAFFIC
PAGE
MANAGEMENT
SPEED
TRAFFIC
FUEL
AIR/NOISE
EMERGENCY
• TEST VS.
NO.
DEVICE/MEASURE
REDUCTION
REDUCTION
CONSUMPTION
POLLUTION
COST
SERVICES
PERMANENT
OTHER
B -26
Turn Restrictions
Varies
Yes
Small Increase
No Effect
Low
No Effect
Temporary or
Permanent
B -27
One -Way Streets
No
Possible
Small Decrease
Small Decrease
Low
Varies
Temporary or
Permanent
B -28
Traffic Signal
Possible
Varies
Varies
Varies
High
No Effect
Temporary or
( "Rest on Red" and
Permanent
"Rest on Green ")
B -29
Pavement Striping
Possible
No Effect
No Effect
No Effect
Low
No Effect
Permanent
Installation Only
City of EdinaTransportation Policy B -3 April 2005
Definition: Speed humps are wave - shaped paved humps in the street. The height of the speed hump determines how
fast it may be navigated without causing discomfort to the driver or damage to the vehicle. Discomfort increases a,
speed over the hump increases. Typically speed humps are placed in a series rather than singularly. (Road humps,
undulations.)
Description:
• Rounded raised areas of pavement typically 12 to 14
feet in length.
• Often placed in a series (typically spaced 300 to 600
feet apart).
• Sometimes called road humps or undulations.
Applications:
• Residential, local streets.
• Not allowed on collector and arterial streets.
• Midblock placement, not at an intersection.
• Not on grades greater than 5 percent.
• Work well with neckdowns.
Design /Installation Issues:
• Typically 12 to 14 feet in length; other lengths (10,
22, and 30 feet).
• Speed hump shapes include parabolic, circular, and
sinusoidal.
• Hump heights range between 3 and 4 inches with
trend toward 3 - 3 Y2 inches maximum.
• Difficult to construct precisely; may need to specify a
construction tolerance (e.g. t 1/8 inch) on height.
• Often have signage (advance warning sign before
first hump in series and warning sign or object
marker at hump).
• Typically have pavement markings (zigzag, shark's
tooth, chevron, zebra).
• Taper edge near curb to allow gap for drainage.
• Some have speed advisories.
• Bicyclists prefer that it not cover or cross a bike lane.
-CC] flrl
t ■� iW7 r
Advantages:
• Effective speed control /reduction at the
installation.
• May reduce traffic volumes.
• Does not impact parking.
• Works well with curb extensions.
Disadvantages:
• May increase noise (breaking and
acceleration).
• May impact drainage.
• Not appropriate for grades greater than 5
percent.
• May shift traffic to parallel streets.
• Tend to reduce air quality and increase
energy consumption.
• May increase speeds between humps.
• May cause bus passengers discomfort.
• Not appropriate on some horizontal /vertical
curves.
• Requires signage that may be considered
unsightly.
tvaluallon
uonsiaeratlons
Speed
Traffic
Fuel
Air /Noise
Cost
Emergency
Test vs.
Other
Reduction
Reduction
Consumption
Pollution
Services
Permanent
Probable
Possible
Small
Small
Low
Possible
Test
Not Used on
Increase
Increase
Increased
Installation
Collector and
Response Time
Possible
Arterial Streets
City of Edina Transportation Policy B-4 April 2005
Definition: Trapezoidal shaped speed humps in the street, similar to regular speed humps. (Trapezoidal humps,
Description:
• Long raised speed humps with a flat section in the
middle and ramps on the ends; sometimes
constructed with brick or other textured materials on
the flat section.
Applications:
• Residential, local streets.
• Not allowed on collector and arterial streets.
• Typically long enough for the entire wheelbase of a
passenger car to rest on top.
• Midblock placement or at an intersection.
• Not on grades greater than 5 percent.
• Work well with neckdowns.
Design /Installation Issues:
• Typically 22 feet in the direction of travel with 6 foot
ramps on each end and a 10 foot flat section in the
middle; other lengths (32 and 48 feet).
• Most common height is between 3 and 4 inches (as
high as 6 inches).
• Ramps are typically 6 feet long (up to 10 feet long)
and are either parabolic or linear.
Evaluation Considerations
�r
{
Advantages:
• Effective speed control /reduction at the
installation.
• Designed to be aesthetically pleasing.
• May reduce traffic volumes.
• Typically does not impact parking.
• Typically preferred by fire department over
speed hump.
Disadvantages:
• May increase noise (breaking and
acceleration).
• May impact drainage.
• Not appropriate for grades greater than 5
percent.
• May shift traffic to parallel streets.
• May increase speeds between tables.
• May cause bus passengers discomfort.
• Not appropriate on some curves.
Speed
Traffic
Fuel
Air /Noise
Cost
Emergency
Test vs.
Other
Reduction
Reduction
Consumption
Pollution
Services
Permanent
Probable
Possible
Small
Small
Low
Possible
Test
Not Used on
Increase
Increase
Increased
Installation
Collector and
Response Time
Possible
Arterial Streets
City of Edina Transportation Policy B -5 April 2005
Definition: A speed table designed as a pedestrian crossing, generally used at mid -block locations. (Raised crossings,
sidewalk extensions.)
Description:
• Speed Table with flat area to accommodate
pedestrian traffic.
Applications:
• Local streets.
• Not allowed on collector and arterial streets.
• Midblock placement or at an intersection.
• Not on grades greater than 5 percent.
• Works well in combination with curb extensions and
curb radius reductions.
Design /Installation Issues:
• Typically 22 feet in the direction of travel with 6 foot
ramps on each end and a 10 foot flat. section in the
middle; other lengths (32 and 48 feet) reported in
U.S. practice.
• Most common height is between 3 and 4 inches (as
high as 6 inches).
• Ramps are typically 6 feet long (up to 10 feet long)
and are either parabolic or linear.
ri
,ice(► = i. -; __I
Advantages:
• Effective speed control /reduction at the
installation.
• Effective pedestrian amenity.
• May be designed to be aesthetically
pleasing.
• May reduce traffic volumes.
• Increases pedestrian visibility and
likelihood that driver yields to pedestrian.
Disadvantages:
• May increase noise (breaking and
acceleration).
• May impact drainage.
• Not appropriate for grades greater than 5
percent.
• May shift traffic to parallel streets.
• May cause bus passengers discomfort.
• Not appropriate on some curves.
Evaluation
conslaeratlons
Speed
Traffic
Fuel
Air /Noise
Cost
Emergency
Test vs.
Other
Reduction
Reduction
Consumption
Pollution
Services
Permanent
Possible
Possible
Small
Small
Low
Possible
Permanent
Not Used on
Increase
Increase
Increased
Installation
Collector and
Response Time
Only
Arterial
Streets
City of Edina Transportation Policy B -6 April 2005
Definition: A raised plateau where roads intersect. The plateau is generally 4 inches above the surrounding street.
(Raised junctions, intersection humps, plateaus.)
Description:
• Flat raised areas covering entire intersections, with
ramps on all approaches and often with brick or other
textured materials on the flat section and ramps.
Applications:
• Local streets.
• Allowed on collector and arterial streets at all -way
stop controlled intersection only.
• Works well with curb extensions and textured
crosswalks.
• Often part of an area wide traffic calming scheme
involving both intersecting streets.
Design /Installation Issues:
• Storm drainage modifications may be necessary.
• Typically rise to sidewalk level.
• May require bollards to define edge of roadway
• Installations typically have gentle 1:40 slopes on
ramps.
• Not typically used in densely developed urban areas
where loss of parking would be unacceptable.
Evaluation Considerations
Advantages:
• Reduction in through movement speeds at
intersection.
• No effect on access.
• Makes entire intersections more
pedestrian - friendly.
• Designed to be aesthetically pleasing.
Disadvantages:
• May slow emergency vehicles to
approximately 15 miles per hour.
• May impact drainage.
Speed
Traffic
Fuel
Air /Noise
Cost
Emergency
Test vs.
Other
Reduction
Reduction
Consumption
Pollution
Services
Permanent
Probable
Possible
Small
Small
Medium to
Possible
Permanent
Possible
Increase
Increase
High
Increased
Installation
Drainage
Response Time
Only
Problem
City of Edina Transportation Policy B -7 April 2005
Definition: A change in pavement texture (e.g., asphalt road to brick crossing) that helps to make drivers aware of a
change in the driving environment.
Description:
. An area within in the roadway set off from the typical
pavement (e.g. bituminous and concrete) by using
cobble stones, stamped concrete, etc.
Applications:
• Used as community enhancement and /or as a
gateway treatment.
• Works well with raised crosswalk and intersection
applications.
Design /installation Issues:
. In some cases, not preferred by bicyclists due to
rough surface.
Advantages:
• Designed to be aesthetically pleasing.
• May be used to define pedestrian crossing.
• May reduce speeds.
Disadvantages:
• Increased Maintenance.
• May increase noise.
Evaluation
consiaerazions
Speed
Traffic
Fuel
Air /Noise
Cost
Emergency
Test vs.
Other
Reduction
Reduction
Consumption
Pollution
Services
Permanent
Possible
No Effect
No Change
Minimal
Low to
Minimal
Permanent
Effect
Medium
Impact
Installation
Only
City of Edina Transportation Policy B -8 April ZUU--,
Definition: An island or barrier in the center of a street that serves to segregate traffic. (Midblock medians, median
slowpoints, median chokers, central islands.)
Description:
• Raised islands located along the centerline of a
street that narrow the travel lanes at that location.
Applications:
• Are often nicely landscaped to provide visual amenity
and neighborhood identity.
• Can help pedestrianize streets by providing a mid-
point refuge for pedestrians crossings.
• Sometimes used on wide streets to narrow travel
lanes.
• Works well when combined with crosswalks.
Design /Installation Issues:
• Bicyclists prefer not to have the travel way narrowed
into path of motor vehicles.
• Islands need to be wide enough to allow signs to
mark them.
• Driving lanes in each direction should be 12 feet plus
gutter width.
• Driveways, alleys, and snowplow operations should
be considered.
• Should not be used where on- street parking needs
are extensive.
Evaluation Considerations
J '%
�I
r
MU
Advantages:
• Reduces pedestrian crossing width.
• Provides a refuge for pedestrians and
cyclists.
• Provides barrier between lanes of traffic.
• May produce a limited reduction in vehicle
speeds.
• May visually enhance the street through
landscaping.
• May prevent passing of turning vehicles.
• Preferred by fire department/emergency
response agencies to most other traffic
calming measures.
• May reduce traffic volumes.
• Self- enforcing.
Disadvantages:
• May reduce parking and driveway access.
• May reduce separation for bicycles and
pedestrians.
• May limit visibility of pedestrian crossings.
• May reduce driver sightlines if over -
landscaped.
• Increased maintenance.
Speed
Traffic
Fuel
Air /Noise
Cost
Emergency
Test vs.
Other
Reduction
Reduction
Consumption
Pollution
Services
Permanent
Possible
Possible
No Effect
No Effect
Medium
Minimal, Impact
Test
Increased
Installation
Maintenance
Possible
City of Edina Transportation Policy B -9 April 2005
Definition: Physical curb reduction of road width at intersections. Similar to lane narrowing but used at intersection(s).
Widening of street corners at intersections to discourage cut - through traffic, to improve pedestrian access and to hell
define neighborhoods. (Nubs, bulb -outs, knuckles, intersection narrowings, corner bulges, safe crosses.)
Description:
• Realignment of curb, reducing street width at
intersections.
Applications:
• Residential, local streets.
• Should not be used in locations where turn lanes or
through lanes would be lost.
• County typically does not allow neckdowns directly
adjacent to county roads.
• Can be used in multiple applications or on a single
segment of roadway.
Design /Installation Issues:
• Must result in a minimum intersection opening and
radii to accommodate turning movements.
• Drainage issues may be significant.
• Vertical delineators or object markers are often used
to make visible to snowplow operators.
Evaluation Considerations
Advantages:
• May be aesthetically pleasing if
landscaped.
• Reduces pedestrian crossing distance.
• May reduce speeds and traffic volumes.
• Self- enforcing.
• May improve sight lines.
Disadvantages:
• Unfriendly to cyclists unless designed to
accommodate them.
• Landscaping may cause sight line
problems.
• Increased maintenance if landscaped.
• May impact drainage.
• May impact bicycle accommodations.
• May impact parking.
• May require signage that may be
considered unsightly.
Speed
Traffic
Fuel
Air /Noise
Cost
Emergency
Test vs.
Other
Reduction
Reduction
Consumption
Pollution
Services
Permanent
Possible
Possible
Small
Small
Medium to
Minimal Impact
Test
Increase
Increase
High
Installation
Possible
City of Edina Transportation Policy B -10 April 2005
Definition: Treatment to a street that includes a sign, banner, landscaping or other structure that helps to communicate
a sense of neighborhood identity.
Description:
• Monument or landscaping used to denote an
entrance into a neighborhood.
Applications:
• Used at entrances to residential neighborhoods
typically adjacent to collector or arterial roadways.
Design /Installation Issues:
• Determination and agreement for responsibility of
maintenance.
• Drainage issues may be significant.
• Must maintain proper intersection sight lines.
Evaluation Considerations
Advantages:
• Positive indication of a change in
environment from arterial /collector
roadways to residential street.
• May reduce entry speed.
• Helps give neighborhood a sense of
identity.
• Allows neighborhood creativity and
participation in design.
Disadvantages:
• Increased maintenance.
• Determination and agreement of
maintenance responsibility.
Speed
Traffic
Fuel
Air /Noise
Cost
Emergency
Test vs.
Other
Reduction
Reduction
Consumption
Pollution
Services
Permanent
Possible
Possible
No Change
Small
Medium to
Minimal Impact
Permanent
Increased
Decrease
High
Installation
Maintenance
Only
City of Edina Transportation Policy B -11 April 2005
Definition: Physical street narrowing to expand sidewalks and landscaped areas; possibly adding medians, on street
parking, etc. (Pinch points, lane narrowing, midblock narrowings, midblock yield points, constrictions.)
Description:
• Curb extensions at midblock that narrow a street by
widening the boulevard or sidewalk area.
Applications:
• Works well with pedestrian crossings.
• Works well with speed humps, speed tables, raised
intersections, textured pavement, and raised median
islands.
• Some applications use an island, which allows
drainage and bicyclists to continue between the
choker and the original curb line.
Design /Installation Issues:
• Bicyclists prefer not to have the travelway narrowed
into the path of motor vehicles.
• Typically designed to narrow road to 22 feet for two -
way traffic with 1:10 tapers at the ends.
• Adequate drainage is a key consideration.
• Provides opportunity for landscaping.
• Vertical delineators, bollards or object markers are
often used to make visible to snowplow operators.
• Effective when used in a series.
• Avoid narrowings of two way traffic to single lanes.
• Avoid use in locations where at the crest of a hill and
on some curves.
• Parking must be restricted at the choker.
;w =
Advantages:
• Reduces pedestrian crossing width and
increases visibility of pedestrian.
• May reduce speed and traffic volume
• Self- enforcing.
• Preferred by many fire department/
emergency response agencies to most
other traffic calming measures.
Disadvantages:
• May impact parking and driveway access.
• Unfriendly to bicyclists unless designed to
accommodate them.
• May impact drainage.
Evaluation
uonsiaerazions
Speed
Traffic
Fuel
Air /Noise
Cost
Emergency
Test vs.
Other
Reduction
Reduction
Consumption
Pollution
Services
Permanent
Probable
Possible
Small
Small
Medium
Minimal Impact
Test
May Impact
Increase
Increase
Installation
Drainage
Possible
City of Edina Transportation Policy B -12 April 2005
Definition: Mainline deviations to deter the path of travel so that the street is not a straight line (by the installation of
offset curb extensions). (Deviations, serpentines, reversing curves, twists.)
Description:
• A series of narrowings or curb extensions that
alternate from one side of the street to the other
forming S- shaped curves.
Applications:
• Residential, local streets.
• Not allowed on collector and arterial streets.
• Appropriate for midblock locations only.
• Most effective with equivalent volumes on both
approaches.
• Typically, is a series of at least three curb extensions.
• Can use on- street parking to create chicane.
• Very effective method of changing the initial
impression of the street. If designed correctly,
drivers will not be able to see through. Appears as a
road closure yet allows through movement.
Design /Installation Issues:
• Unless well designed, chicanes may still permit
speeding by drivers cutting straight paths across the
center line.
• Recommend shifts in alignment of at least one lane
width, deflection angles of at least 45 degrees, and
center islands to prevent drivers from taking a
straight "racing line" through the feature.
Pvaliiatinn Considerations
t
s 11L
s
t
r
Advantages:
• Provides opportunity for landscaping.
• Pedestrians have reduced crossing
distance.
• Imposes minimal inconveniences to local
traffic.
• Accepted by public as speed control
device.
• May reduce speed and traffic volumes.
• Self- enforcing.
• Emergency response typically prefer two -
lane chicanes to speed humps.
Disadvantages:
• Can impact parking and driveway access.
• Street sweeping may need to be done
manually.
• May impact drainage.
• Typically, not appropriate for intersections.
• Not appropriate on some curves.
• May cause problems during winter.
• Increased maintenance.
• May create head -on conflicts on narrow
streets.
Speed
Traffic
Fuel
Air /Noise
Cost
Emergency
Test vs.
Other
Reduction
Reduction
Consumption
Pollution
Services
Permanent
Probable
Possible
Slight
Slight
Medium to
Minimal
Test
Not Used on
Increase
Increase
High
Impact
Installation
Collector and
Possible
Arterial streets
City of Edina Transportation Policy B -13 April 2005
Definition: Physical realignment of intersection typically used to promote better through movements for a major
roadway (vs. a minor roadway). (Modified intersections.)
Description:
• Revised street geometrics of an existing intersection
that typically improves and decreases the traffic
delay for the main through movement (vs. the less
important road).
Applications:
• Typically used to correct and provide a non -stop
condition for the legs of an existing intersection with
the larger traffic volume.
• Used to help define driver's right -of -way.
Design /Installation Issues:
• Drainage may be an issue.
• May require mitigation signage due to substandard
curvature of roadway.
Advantages:
• Provides a more fluent through movement
for the major roadway.
• Improves driver expectation by providing a
more typical intersection.
• May better define driver's right -of -way.
• May reduce traffic volume.
Disadvantages:
• May impact parking and driveway access.
• May impact drainage.
• May be perceived as an inconvenience by
some neighbors.
• May require additional right -of -way
acquisition.
Evaluation
considerations
Speed
Traffic
Fuel
Air /Noise
Cost
Emergency
Test vs.
Other
Reduction
Reduction
Consumption
Pollution
Services
Permanent
Varies
Varies
Small
Small
High
Varies
Permanent
Decrease
Decrease
Installation
Only
City of Edina Transportation Policy B -14 April 2005
Definition: Circular, raised island placed within the middle of intersections, requiring vehicles to divert around them,
potentially forcing drivers to slow down as they traverse around the circle. (Intersection islands, similar to roundabouts.)
Description:
• Raised islands, placed in intersections, around which
traffic circulates (this is not a roundabout).
• Motorists yield to motorists already in the intersection.
• Require drivers to slow to a speed that allows them to
comfortably maneuver around them.
Applications:
• Intersections of local streets.
• Not allowed on collector and arterial streets.
• One lane each direction entering intersection.
Design /Installation Issues:
• Typically circular in shape, though not always.
• Often controlled by YIELD signs on all approaches, but
many different signage approaches are used.
• Key design features are the offset distance (distance
between projection of street curb and center island),
lane width for circling the circle, the circle diameter,
height of mountable outer ring for large vehicles such
as school buses and trash trucks, and potential for
pedestrian path - vehicle path conflicts.
• Usually landscaped in center islands. Quality of
landscaping and its maintenance are key issues.
• Landscaping needs to be designed to allow adequate
sight distance.
• Not typically used at intersections with high volume of
large trucks and buses turning left.
Funhi tinn Cnnsiderations
I
PR
I
i W,
v6l
Advantages:
• No effect on access.
• May reduce speed and traffic volumes.
• Effective in reducing intersection collisions.
• Self- enforcing.
Disadvantages:
• Can result in bicycle /auto conflicts at
intersections because of narrowed travel
lane.
• May require parking restrictions at
intersection.
• Left turns may be confusing.
• Care must be taken to avoid routing
vehicles through unmarked crosswalks on
side - street approach.
• Increased maintenance.
Speed
Traffic
^Fuel
Air /Noise
Cost
Emergency
Test vs.
Other
Reduction
Reduction
Consumption
Pollution
Services
Permanent
Possible
Possible
Slight
Small
Medium
Possible
Test
Not Used on
Increase
Increase
Increased
Installation
Collector and
Response Time
Possible
Arterial streets
City of Edina Transportation Policy B -15 April 2005
Definition: Raised circular areas (similar to medians) placed at intersections. Drivers travel in a counterclockwise
direction around the circle. Modern roundabouts are "yield upon entry", meaning that cars in the circle have the right of
way and cars entering the circle must wait to do so until the path is clear. When a roundabout is placed in an
intersection, vehicles may not travel in a straight line. (Rotaries.)
Description:
• Circular intersections with specific design and traffic
control features including yield control of all entering
traffic, channelized approaches, and appropriate
geometric curvature to ensure travel speeds within
the roundabout are less than 30 mph.
Applications:
• Intersections of local, collector and arterial streets.
• Used to improve the operation of an intersection.
• Sometimes used as community enhancement as a
gateway treatment.
• Used in high crash areas where the crash type is
inclined to be corrected by the use of a roundabout.
Design /Installation Issues:
• Adequate speed reduction.
• Design vehicle consideration.
• Pedestrian crossings located at least one vehicle
length upstream from crossing and only across legs.
• Circulating vehicles have the right -of -way.
• All vehicles circulate in a counter - clockwise direction
and pass to the right of the central island.
• Incorporate splitter islands to separate traffic, to
deflect entering traffic, and to provide opportunity for
pedestrians to cross in two stages.
Circular Roadway
t15- Splitter Island
Truck
Apron One -way operation 20 mph �/ Yield at
Entry
Advantages:
• Reduces speed at intersection approach
• Longer speed reduction influence zone.
• May reduce traffic volumes.
• Effective in reducing intersection collisions.
• Self- enforcing.
• Provides space for landscaping.
• Provides a good environment for bicycles.
• Provides equal access to intersections for
all drivers.
• Cheaper to maintain than a traffic signal.
Disadvantages:
• Requires a larger amount of right -of -way
than a typical intersection.
• May require additional lighting and signing.
• Initial safety issues as drivers adjust.
• Increased maintenance responsibilities.
Evaluation
consiaerations
Speed
Traffic
Fuel
Air /Noise
Cost
Emergency
Test vs.
Other
Reduction
Reduction
Consumption
Pollution
Services
Permanent
Probable
Possible
No Effect
Slight
Medium to
Possible
Permanent
Increased
Increase
High
Increased
Installation
Maintenanc.
Response Time
Only
City of Edina Transportation Policy B -16 April 2005
Definition: A barrier placed diagonally across a four - legged intersection, interrupting traffic flow across the intersection.
phis type of barrier may be used to create a maze -like effect in a neighborhood. (Diagonal diverter.)
Description:
• Barriers placed diagonally across an intersection,
blocking the through movement.
Applications:
• Used only on local roadways.
• Not allowed on collector and arterial streets.
• Closures are typically applied only after other
measures have failed or have been determined to be
inappropriate.
• Often used in sets to make travel through
neighborhoods more circuitous - typically staggered
internally in a neighborhood, which leaves through
movement possible but less attractive than
alternative (external) routes.
• Closures have been used as a crime prevention tool.
Design /Installation Issues:
• Provisions are available to make diverters passable
for pedestrians and bicyclists.
• There may be legal issues associated with closing a
public street.
• Barriers may consist of landscaped islands, walls,
gates, side -by -side bollards, or any other obstruction
that leave an opening smaller than the width of a
passenger car.
• Diverter width and curvature is dependent upon the
intersection roadway widths.
G..�I■■-ft4lr.n f`nnairlaratinne
�1
w�
I
;
L
,ca�u
Advantages:
• Typically reduces traffic volumes.
• Reduces speeds at the closure area.
• Bicycles /pedestrians may not be
restricted.
Disadvantages:
• May divert significant traffic volumes to
parallel local streets.
• No significant effect on vehicle speeds
beyond the closed block.
• Increased emergency response in most
cases.
• Interrupts street network connectivity.
• May impact drainage.
• May impact parking.
• Tends to increase travel distance.
• May increase maintenance.
`rp�Mf. •�V�■
Speed
vvv...v..r
Traffic
�. r...
Fuel
Air /Noise
Cost
Emergency
Test vs.
Other
Reduction
Reduction
Consumption
Pollution
Services
Permanent
Probable
Probable
Small
Small
Low to
Varies
Test
Not Used on
Increase
Increase
Medium
Installation
Collector and
Possible
Arterial streets
City of Edina Transportation Policy B -17 April 2005
Definition: Physical blockage of one direction of traffic on a two -way street. The open lane of traffic is signed "One
way", and traffic from the blocked lane is not allowed to go around the barrier through the open lane. (Half closure.)
Description:
• Barriers that block travel in one direction for a short
distance on otherwise two -way streets (when two
half - closures are placed across from one another at
an intersection, the result is a semi - diverter).
Applications:
• Not allowed on collector and arterial streets.
• Closures are typically applied only after other
measures have failed or been determined to be
inappropriate.
• Often used in sets to make travel through
neighborhoods more circuitous - typically staggered
internally in a neighborhood, which leaves through
movement possible but less attractive than
alternative (external) routes.
• Closures have been used as a crime prevention tool.
• Intended to reduce the through traffic in one direction
without the negative access issues of one -way
streets.
Design /Installation Issues:
• Partial closure must extend to centerline of the
affected street.
• A minimum opening of 14 feet must be maintained.
• Provisions are available to make diverters passable
for pedestrians and bicyclists.
• Barriers may consist of landscaped islands.
Evaluation Considerations
rwo
"tn
tnaia ���
Advantages:
• Typically reduces traffic volumes (mostly in
one direction and possibly in the other).
• Reduces speeds at the closure area.
• Allows two -way traffic in the remainder of
the street.
• Shorter pedestrian crossing distance.
Disadvantages:
• May divert significant traffic volumes to
parallel local streets.
• No significant effect on vehicle speeds
beyond the closed block.
• Interrupts street network connectivity.
• Enforcement issues (compliance may not
be 100 %)
• Increased maintenance if landscaped.
• Emergency vehicles may be minimally
affected (they have to drive around partial
closure with care).
• Reduces access to residents.
Speed
Traffic
Fuel
Air /Noise
Cost
Emergency
Test vs.
Other
Reduction
Reduction
Consumption
Pollution
Services
Permanent
Possible
Probable
Small
Small
Medium
Minimal
Test
Not Used on
Increase
Increase
Impact
Installation
Collector and
Possible
Arterial streets
City of Edina Transportation Policy B -18 April 2005
a and no outlet) constructed with a circular turn - around area.
Description:
• A street with no outlet that eliminates cut - through
traffic.
Applications:
• Used only on local streets.
• Not allowed on collector and arterial streets.
• Cannot be used on truck routes, bus routes, snow
emergency routes, through streets, or any other
major roadway.
Design /Installation Issues:
• Must be a minimum of 120 feet of right -of -way
(diameter) to accommodate the minimum turn - around
radius of 40 feet.
• Obtain approval of police, fire and emergency
medical services.
Evaluation Considerations
I
Advantages:
• Eliminates through traffic.
• Reduces speed of the remaining vehicles.
• Improves safety for all the street users.
• Pedestrian and bike access maintained.
Disadvantages:
• Reduces emergency vehicle access.
• Reduces access to properties for
residents.
• May be perceived as an inconvenience by
some neighbors and an unwarranted
restriction by the general public.
• May increase trip lengths.
• May increase volumes on other streets.
• May require additional right -of -way
acquisition.
Speed
Traffic
Fuel
Air /Noise
Cost
Emergency
Test vs.
Other
Reduction
Reduction
Consumption
Pollution
Services
Permanent
Probable
Yes
Small
Small
High
Possible
Test
Not Used on
Increase
Increase
Increased
Installation
Collector and
Response Time
Possible
Arterial
streets
City of Edina Transportation Policy B -19 April 2005
Definition: Raised island or barrier in the center of the street that serves to segregate traffic.
Description:
• Raised islands in the centerline of a street that
continues through an intersection that blocks the left
turn movement from all intersection approaches and
the through movement at the cross street.
Applications:
• Median closures are typically applied only after other
measures have failed or been determined to be
inappropriate.
• Intended to reduce the through traffic in one direction
without the negative access issues of one -way
streets.
Design /Installation Issues:
• A minimum opening of 14 feet must be maintained.
• Provisions are available to make diverters passable
for pedestrians and bicyclists.
• Barriers may consist of landscaped islands.
Evaluation Considerations
�I
i
�f
5
U
E
r
Advantages:
• Typically reduces traffic volumes (mostly in
one direction and possibly in the other).
• Reduces speeds at the median area.
• Allows two -way traffic in the remainder of
the street.
• .Shorter pedestrian crossing distance.
Disadvantages:
• May divert significant traffic volumes to
parallel local streets.
• No significant effect on vehicle speeds
beyond the closed block.
• Interrupts street network connectivity.
• Enforcement issues (compliance may not
be 100 %)
• Increased maintenance if landscaped.
• Emergency vehicles may be minimally
affected.
• Reduces access to residents.
Speed
Traffic
Fuel
Air /Noise
Cost
Emergency
Test vs.
Other
Reduction
Reduction
Consumption
Pollution
Services
Permanent
Small
Possible
No Effect
No Effect
Varies
Possible
Test
Possibility
Increased
Installation
Response Time
Possible
City of Edina Transportation Policy B -20 April 2005
Definition: Small traffic islands installed at intersections to channel turning movements. (Forced turn barriers,
diverters.)
Description:
• Raised island barriers placed at intersections,
typically blocking the through movement.
Applications:
• Used only on local roadways.
• Not allowed on collector and arterial streets.
• Physical barrier used to divert traffic to help prevent
the temptation of drivers from making an illegal
turning or through movement.
• Intended to reduce traffic volume or to prevent a
turning movement due to safety constraints.
• Used for access management.
Design /Installation Issues:
• Island width and curvature is dependent upon the
intersection roadway widths.
• Must design corner radii to accommodate vehicle
turning movements (e.g. Trucks and buses).
WT
Evaluation Considerations
i
r
1
f
Advantages:
• Typically reduces traffic volumes.
• May reduce speeds at island area.
Disadvantages:
• May divert significant traffic volumes to
parallel streets.
• Emergency vehicles may be minimally
affected (they have to drive around island
with care).
• May interrupt street network connectivity.
• May increase travel distance.
Speed
Traffic
Fuel
Air /Noise
Cost
Emergency
Test vs.
Other
Reduction
Reduction
Consumption
Pollution
Services
Permanent
Possible
Possible
Small
Small
Low to
Possible
Test
Not Used on
Increase
Increase
Medium
Increased
Installation
Collector and
Response Time
Possible
Arterial streets
City of Edina Transportation Policy B -21 April 2005
Definition: Specific monitoring of speeding and other violations by police due to observed, frequent law disobedience.
Description:
• Use of local police to enforce traffic laws appropriate
to traffic problems identified in a neighborhood.
Applications:
• Should only be used when specific problems are
outlined or documented.
• Can be used in conjunction with speed wagon
applications.
Design /Installation Issues:
• No design needed in a physical sense.
• Due to staff time constraints, every effort should be
made to clearly identify the problem (e.g. speeding,
driving in the parking lane, running stop signs, etc.)
• The problem should be narrowed down to the
occurrence day, time, specific location, or vehicle
type.
• Follow -ups indicating the impact of enforcement are
needed to determine the effectiveness.
Evaluation Considerations
Advantages:
• Good temporary public relations tool.
• Serves to inform pu0blic that traffic law
violations are undesirable behavior for
which there are consequences.
• Easy to implement.
• Can result in area -wide positive impacts.
Disadvantages:
• Effect is not permanent.
• Enforcement is an expensive tool.
Speed
Traffic
Fuel
Air /Noise
Cost
Emergency
Test vs.
Other
Reduction
Reduction
Consumption
Pollution
Services
Permanent
Depends
Possible
No Effect
No Effect
High
No Effect
Temporary
on
Amount
City of Edina Transportation Policy B -22 April 2005
Definition: Driver feedback signs that use radar to provide motorists with an instant message, displayed on a reader
board, telling them how fast they are driving. (Permanent Radar Signs.)
Description:
• Tool to help raise driver awareness.
• Displays speeds of passing vehicles on a reader
board
• Used in areas with frequent speeding
• Stationary Radar Signs direct a motorist's attention to
the posted speed limit and displays the speed of the
driver's vehicle on a large message board.
• Purpose is to remind drivers that they are speeding
to help encourage compliance.
Applications:
• The Police Department may use it as a "speed
checkpoint" and have an officer present to issue
citations to violators.
• Portable Radar Sign on a dolly enables residents to
borrow and place on their street
• Stationary Radar Signs are used in locations that do
not qualify for other physical measures, such as
speed humps.
Design /installation Issues:
• Needs power to function.
Stationary Radar Signs
Evaluation Considerations
Radar Dolly
Radar Speed Trailer
Advantages:
• Heightens driver awareness of the speed
limit and the speed they are traveling.
Disadvantages:
• May provide only short-term effectiveness.
• Vandalism may be an issue.
Speed
Traffic
Fuel
Air /Noise
Cost
Emergency
Test vs.
Other
Reduction
Reduction
Consumption
Pollution
Services
Permanent
Probable
No Effect
No Effect
No Effect
Low
No Effect
Temporary or
Permanent
City of Edina Transportation Policy B -23 April 2005
Definition: Educational campaign used to appeal for compliance with traffic laws.
Description:
• Neighborhood traffic safety campaigns that typically
consist of personalized letters or general flyers that
are distributed to all residents of a neighborhood that
cite statistics on speeding within the neighborhood
and appeal for compliance with traffic laws.
Applications:
• Used in local residential neighborhoods.
Design /Installation Issues:
• Target all residents of an entire neighborhood (not
certain individuals).
Evaluation Considerations
Neighborhood Traffic
Management
Area
Advantages:
• Low cost.
• May reduce speeds.
• Residents may feel better after the
experience despite lack of noticeable
results.
Disadvantages:
• Effects may be short term.
Speed
Traffic
Fuel
Air /Noise
Cost
Emergency
Test vs.
Other
Reduction
Reduction
Consumption
Pollution
Services
Permanent
Possible
No Effect
No Effect
No Effect
Low
No Effect
Temporary or
Permanent
City of Edina Transportation Policy B -24 April 2005
Definition: A regulatory sign that gives notice to road users that traffic is required to stop. Used to assign right -of -way
at an intersection. Recommended for installation only when specific warrants are met in accordance with the Minnesota
Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices ( MMUTCD). Stop signs are generally not installed to divert traffic or reduce
speeding.
Description:
• An octagonal sign with a white legend and border on
red background used to require traffic to stop.
Applications:
• Used at an intersection of a less important road with
main road where application of the normal right -of-
way rule would not be expected to provide a
reasonably safe operation.
• Used at a street entering a through highway or street.
• Used at an unsignalized intersection in a signalized
area.
• Used when abnormal conditions exist such as very
high speeds, restricted view or crash records indicate
a need for stop control.
Design /Installation Issues:
• Stop signs should not be used for speed control.
• Stop signs should be installed in manner that
minimizes the numbers of vehicles having to stop.
• In most cases, the street carrying the lowest volume
should be stopped. A stop sign should not be
installed on the major street unless justified by a
traffic engineering study.
Evaluation Considerations
Advantages:
• Relatively inexpensive installation cost.
• Effectively defines driver's right -of -way.
• Reduces speed at the intersection.
Disadvantages:
• When not warranted and used improperly,
they typically cause negative traffic safety
impacts (non - compliance with the signs
and increased accidents).
• May result in increased mid -block
speeding.
• Full compliance with stop control is rare.
Speed
Traffic
Fuel
Air /Noise
Cost
Emergency
Test vs.
Other
Reduction
Reduction
Consumption
Pollution
Services
Permanent
Varies
Varies
Small
Small
Low
Possible
Temporary or
Must meet
(may
Increase
Increase
Increased
Permanent
MMUTCD
increase )
Response Time
warrants
City of Edina Transportation Policy B -25 April 2005
Definition: The use of regulatory signs to restrict turning movements entirely or partially (e.g. restrictions for certain
time periods during peak traffic periods).
Description:
• Prohibition of turns typically regulated by signs
placed where they will most be easily seen by road
users who might be intending to turn.
Applications:
• Used to restrict right, left and U- turns at intersections
to work in conjunction with medians, signal systems,
etc.
• Used during certain time periods (peak traffic hours)
to help maintain safety of certain driving situations.
Design /Installation Issues:
• Most effective when applied to peak traffic hours.
• Consideration should be given to install physical
barriers (active devices) to aid in the enforcement of
the regulatory sign (passive device).
Evaluation Considerations
Advantages:
• Low installation cost.
• May increase safety.
Disadvantages:
• High violation rates without constant
enforcement or physical barriers.
• May inconvenience residents.
Speed
Traffic
Fuel
Air /Noise
Cost
Emergency
Test vs.
Other
Reduction
Reduction
Consumption
Pollution
Services
Permanent
Varies
Yes
Small
No Effect
Low
No Effect
Temporary or
Increase
Permanent
City of Edina Transportation Policy B -26 April 2005
Definition: Streets that are designated for use by traffic in one direction only. Typically controlled by the use of "One -
Way" regulatory signs.
Description:
• One -way signs used to indicate streets upon which
vehicular traffic is allowed to travel in one direction
only.
Applications:
• Used to restrict through traffic in isolated applications
or in combinations that create maze -like routes
through a neighborhood.
• Used to increase street capacity and traffic flow.
Design /Installation Issues:
• Combine one -way streets in ways that force turns
every block or two to avoid speeding or cut - through
problems.
ONE WAY
Evaluation Considerations
Advantages:
• May increase roadway capacity.
• May reduce traffic volumes.
Disadvantages:
• May inconvenience residents.
• May increase speeds.
• Enforcement issues.
• May increase volumes on other streets.
Speed
Traffic
Fuel
Air /Noise
Cost
Emergency
Test vs.
Other
Reduction
Reduction
Consumption
Pollution
Services
Permanent
No
Possible
Small
Small
Low
Varies
Temporary or
Decrease
Decrease
Permanent
City of Edina Transportation Policy B -27 April 2005
Definition: Semi - actuated traffic signals that are programmed to rest on green or red for the different legs of the
intersection. Typically, signals are dependent upon traffic demand and maximized based upon total intersection delay
with the rest on red given to the leg with the lower approach volume.
Description:
• 'Rest on Red" is an application of a signal system
where all approaches to an intersection face red
lights. If advance loops detect an approaching
vehicle moving at or below the desired speed and no
other vehicle is being served at the cross street, the
signal turns green. If speeding is detected, the green
phase is not triggered until the vehicle comes to rest
at the stop line.
• 'Rest on Green" is an application of a signal system
where approaches along a main street will have a
green light. If the traffic on the main street is moving
at or below the desired speed and no one is waiting
on the side street, the light will remain green on the
main street. The signal will switch to red if speeding
is detected.
Applications:
• An application of a signal system used to control
speed.
Design /Installation Issues:
• Should not be used on roadways with high levels of
traffic due to operational concerns.
• May be used at non -peak times at some
intersections.
Advantages:
• Punishes or rewards based on compliance
with speed limits.
• Somewhat self- enforcing.
Disadvantages:
• May affect intersection operation if used at
intersections with high levels of traffic.
Evaluation
consiaerations
Speed
Traffic
Fuel
Air /Noise
Cost
Emergency
Test vs.
Other
Reduction
Reduction
Consumption
Pollution
Services
Permanent
Possible
Varies
Varies
Varies
High
No Effect
Temporary or
Other
Permanent
Agency
Approval
City of Edina Transportation Policy B -28 April 2005
Definition: Paint or thermoplastic street markings commonly placed for delineation that provides guidance and
information to the road user.
Description:
• Centerline, edgeline and transverse markings on the
street used to provide guidance and information to
the driver.
Applications:
• Used to supplement other traffic control devices.
• Used to effectively convey regulations, guidance or
warning.
• Centerlines and edgeline use may have the effect of
visually narrowing the roadway.
• Used to create bicycle lanes.
• Patterns of transverse markings placed across travel
paths used to help slow traffic at intersections and at
horizontal curve locations.
Design /Installation Issues:
• The materials used for markings should provide the
specified color throughout their useful life.
• Consideration should be given to selecting materials
that will minimize tripping or loss of traction for
pedestrians and bicyclists.
Evaluation Considerations
Advantages:
• Provide important information while
allowing minimal diversion of driver
attention from the roadway.
• Perception of narrowing the roadway may
modestly reduce speeds.
Disadvantages:
• Visibility of markings can be limited by
snow, debris and water.
• Marking durability is limited.
Speed
Traffic
Fuel
Air /Noise
Cost
Emergency
Test vs.
Other
Reduction
Reduction
Consumption
Pollution
Services
Permanent
Possible
No Effect
No Effect
No Effect
Low
No Effect
Permanent
Installation
Only
City of Edina Transportation Policy B -29 April 2005
APPENDIX C - APPLICATION REQUEST FOR NEIGHBORHOOD
TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN
City of Edina Transportation Policy April 2005
Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan Application Form
Contact Name:
Address:
' Day /Message Phone:
Today's Date:
'E -mail Address:
Please indicate traffic issues that concern residents in your
neighborhood:
❑ Speeding ❑ Traffic Volumes
❑ Pedestrian /Bicycle Safety ❑ Accidents
❑ Other:
# Ak
ib)INA
Engineering DeRarlment
4801 West 50 Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424 -1394
(952) 826 -0371
www.cityofedina.com
Suggested Traffic Calming Measures (See Appendix B of the Transportation Commission Policy, please
rank, No. 1 is most favored):
Proposed Location from: to
(street name) (street name)
on
(street name)
We, the undersigned, as residents, hereby request the evaluation of the traffic management device listed
above. We understand we may be assessed for the cost for the device.
Please list all addresses in the potentially benefited area. One signature per household or business.
Date Name lease print) Address Signature
Page of
Please return the completed application form to the Engineering Department at the address noted above.
The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we Inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under
the law, your telephone number is private data. This application when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence
for refusing to supply this Information.
Edina NTMP Application Form- April 2005
APPENDIX D - ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND REFERENCES
City of Edina Transportation Policy April 2005
Acknowledgments and References
Mayor and City Council:
Mayor James Hovland
Councilmember Scot Housh
Councilmember Alice Hulbert
Councilmemeber Linda Masica
Councilmember Ann Swenson
Edina Transportation Commission:
Joni Kelly Bennett
Dean Dovolis
Warren Plante
Fred Richards (Chair)
Marie Thorpe
Les Wanninger
Jean White
Technical and Advisory:
City of Edina Engineering Department
City of Edina Public Works Department
City of Edina Planning Department
City of Edina Police Department
City of Edina Fire Department
City of Edina Local Traffic Task Force
Cities' Websites:
• City of Albuquerque Neighborhood Traffic Management Program
http: / /www.cabg.gov /streets /policies.html
• City of Boulder Planning and Public Works
htip: / /www3.ci.boulder.co.us /pwplan/
• City of Las Vegas Traffic Engineering Division
http: / /www.lasvegasnevada.gov/public works/
• City of Bellevue Transportation Department
http:/ /www.ci.bellevue.wa.us /page.asp ?view =1056
• City of Bloomington Traffic Calming Policy and Procedure Manual
htlp: / /www.ci.bloomington .mn.us /cityhall/commiss /ttac /calmin calming htm
• City of Colorado Springs Traffic Engineering Management
http:/ /www.§pringsgov.com/Page.aW9NavED=1397
• City of Austin Transportation Division
htip://www.ci.austin.tx.us/roadworks/default.htm
• City of Vancouver Engineering Services
hltp://www.city.vancouver.bc.ca/engsvcs/
City of Edina Transportation Policy D -1 April 2005
• City of Gresham's Neighborhood Traffic Control Program
http: / /www.ite.org/traffic /documents /Gresham.pdf
• City of Portland Office of Transportation
hLtp://www.trans.ci.portland.or.us/TrafficcalmingLhow/how.htm
• City of Berkley Office of Transportation
ho: / /www.ci.berkeley.ca.us /transportation/
• Seattle Department of Transportation
htlp://www.seattle.gov/tranWortation/ntcpreports.htm
• City of Savage Traffic Safety Committee
http: / /www.ci.savage.mn.us /traffic safety.html
• City of Tempe Traffic Management Program
bo://www.teMpe.gov/traffic/trafingnt.htm
• City of Asheville Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy
htip://www.ci.asheville.nc.us/engineer/Traffigpblicy.pdf
• City of Honolulu Transportation Services
http:// www. co.honolulu.hi.us /dts /index.htm
• City of Rochester, New York Neighborhood Traffic Calming Programs
http: / /www.ci.rochester .ny.us /streetcalm/index.htm
Websites:
• Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Traffic Calming
hllp://www.ite.org/traffic/index.html
• US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration - Traffic Calming
hLtp://www.ffiwa.dot.gov/enviromnent/tcalm/
• www.TrafficCalming.org
ht!p://www.trafficcalming.org/
• LessTraffic.com
http:// www. lesstraffic .com/Programs /SR/SR.htm
• US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration - Roundabouts
htip://www.tfhrc.gov/safety/00068.pd
• Victoria Transportation Policy Institute
hn: / /www.vlpi.org/tdm/
• Minnesota Safety Council — Crosswalk Safety
hLV://www.mnsafetycouncil.org/crosswalk/
• Bucknell University — Traffic Calming Measures
htip • / /www. students. bucknell. edu / projects /trafficcalming/Measures.htm 1
• Minnesota Department of Transportation — Pedestrian Plan
htip://www.dot.state.mn.us/modes/pedplan.html
• 3 E's of Traffic Calming
hltp://www.3etrafficcalming.com/
• US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration — Safety Research
http: / /www.tfhrc.gov /safety / safety.htm
City of Edina Transportation Policy D -2 I April 2005
Y,
Publications and Manuals:
1) Ewing, Reid H. Traffic Calming State of the Practice. Washington, DC: Institute
of Transportation Engineers 1999.
2) City of Edina Transportation Plan. Edina, Minnesota, 1999.
3) City of Edina Local Traffic Task Force Findings and Recommendations. Edina,
Minnesota. 2003.
4) Collier County Neighborhood Traffic Management Program. Collier County,
Florida.
5) Reardon, Linda. Traffic Calming — Creatively Mitigating Traffic Speeds and
Volumes. CE News. November 2001.
6) Traffic Calming, City of Minneapolis Department of Public Works Transportation
Division. Minneapolis, Minnesota. 1997
7) Canadian Guide to Neighborhood Traffic Calming. Transportation Association
of Canada — Canadian Institute of Transportation Engineers. December 1998
8) Saffel, Amy J. Effective Traffic Calming Applications and Implementations.
Minnesota Local Road Research Board. St. Paul, Minnesota, October 1998
9) Monahan, Bill. Getting People to Police Themselves. APWA Reporter. July
2004
10) Transportation Policy Plan. Metropolitan Council, Twin Cities Metropolitan
Area, Minnesota. December 1996
City of Edina Transportation Policy D -3 April 2005
APPENDIX E - FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION ROAD MAP
City of Edina Transportation Policy April 2005
'a
w91N�,1�
o e
v MY
To.
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
MAYOR AND COUNCIL
From:
CHERYL ENGELMAN
®
CITY SANITARIAN
Date:
APRIL 5, 2005
Subject:
APPOINTMENT OF
❑
CHERYL ENGELMAN AND
To HRA
GORDON HUGHES AS
®
AGENTS OF THE
COMMUNITY HEALTH
Motion
BOARD
Agenda Item
# IV.B.
Consent
®
o
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
®
To Council
❑
Motion
®
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
- Discussion
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval of Resolution No. 2005 -23.
INFORMATION/BACKGROUND:.
Updating City Records.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-23
APPROVING APPOINTMENT OF CHERYL L. ENGELMAN City Of FC�111�
AND GORDON HUGHES AS AGENTS OF THE y
COMMUNITY HEALTH BOARD
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (Community Health Board) of the City of
Edina, Minnesota, pursuant to its authority under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 145A,
that it hereby appoints and authorizes the following persons to act on the Boards behalf
and bind the Board for the following purposes:
To serve as the Board's agent in communicating with the Commissioner of
Health between Board meetings, including receiving information from the
Commissioner and disseminating that information to the Board, as well as providing
information to the Commissioner on the Board's behalf (Minn. Stat. 145A.04, Subd. 2).
NAME: Cheryl L. Engelman
ADDRESS: 4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
PHONE: 952 - 826 -0464
FAX: 952 - 826 -0390
To sign and submit to the Commissioner the prepared Community Health Plan
and revisions to the plan, and activity reports submitted according to Minn. Stat. 145A-
10, Subd. 5, 6, and 8:
NAME: Cheryl L. Engelman
To sign and submit to the Commissioner the Board's annual budget, revisions to
the budget and expenditure reports submitted according to Minn. Stat 145. A.10, Subd.
6 and 8.
NAME: Cheryl L. Engelman
To sign and submit on behalf of the Board, delegation agreements with the
Commissioner of Health according to Minn. Stat. 145A.07, Subd. 1.
NAME: Gordon L. Hughes
ADDRESS: 4801 West 50t" Street
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
PHONE: 952 - 826 -0401
FAX: 952- 826 -0390
Adopted this 5+h day of April, 2005.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor
City Hall 952 - 927 -8861
1 FAX 952 - 826 -0390
4801 WEST 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 0379
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
CITY OF EDINA
)SS
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby
certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City
Council at its Regular Meeting of April 5, 2005, and as recorded in the Minutes of said
Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of
2
,20 .
City Clerk
o e V-�
n • JN�ItppitA't°- •
lase
n
REPORURECOMMENDATION
To:
MAYOR AND COUNCIL
From:
GORDON L. HUGHES
CITY MANAGER
Date:
APRIL 5, 2005
Subject:
BOARDS, COMMISSIONS
AND COMMITTEES TERM
LIMITS
Agenda Item
IV.C.
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
®
To Council.
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
F-1
Ordinance
®
Discussion,
REPORT:
As a follow up to my report as to board and commission term limits, the
Council asked that I provide the length of service of our current board and
commission members. The attached report from Darlene Wallin provides
the initial appointment dates for each member.
e
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 17, 2005
TO: Gordon L. Hughes
City Manager
FROM: Darlene Wallin
SUBJECT: Boards /Commissions /Committees,
Members Appointment Dates
BOARD/
COMMISSION/
Comm ITTEE
MEMBER
APPOINTMENT
DATE
ART CENTER BOARD:
Dolores A. Dege
2/21/89
Sandra Clark
12/21/81
Imogene Andersen
2/1/93
Linda D. Kieffer
2/1/00
Mike Kelly
5/97
Elizabeth Eisenbrey
7/1/85
Ruth Valgemae
2/1/00
Alexandra Sifferlin (Student)
2/1/05
Kenneth Rosland
5/03
Heather Randall King
7/1/03
James VanValkenburg
2/82
COMMUNITY EDUCATION
SERVICES BOARD:
Bethany Brand
6/30/01
Linda Masica
7/1/03
Linda Presthus
3/6/00
COMMUNITY HEALTH
COMMITTEE:
William Alldredge
3/1/04
Spencer Anderson (Student)
7/1/03
Idelle Longman
2/1/01
Lynn Moline
3/1/04
Brad Montgomery
3/1/04
Richard Olson
2/1/02
Tolu Oyelowo
2/1/02
Robert Scott
2/1/05
CONSTRUCTION BOARD
OF APPEALS:
Bruce Bermel
5/21/73
Ronald Clark
3/21/88
Quentin Collins
2/1/69
David Fisher
7/95
John Glover
2/1/02
Edward Noonan
2/7/94
HERITAGE PRESERVATION
BOARD:
Lou Blemaster
2/1/05
William Crawford
2/1/00
Karen Ferrara
2/1/05
Peggy Jennings
2/1/01
Robert Kojetin
2/1/03
Garold Nyberg
2/22/82
Marie Thorpe
2/1/03
Ian Yue (Student)
2/1/05
HUMAN RIGHTS &
RELATIONS COMMISSION:
Mary Brindle
4/7/04(S)
Jim Campbell
2/1/99(S)
Carol Carmichiel
8/19/96 (C)
Betsy Flaten
12/21/87 (S)
Amy Frankfurt
2/1/04(S)
John Goetz
2/1/05 (C)
Idelle Longman
2/1/00 Z(C)
Deborah Kleinman McNeil
2/1/05 (C)
Sharon Ming
2/1/90(S)
Andy Otness
2/1/03 (C)
Wayne Prochniak
2/1/02 9C)
Eileen Supple
10/97(S)
PARK BOARD:
Michael Damann
1 /1 /01
Andrew Finsness
3/1/99
Todd Fronek
2/1/05
Jeff Johnson
School Appointee
George Mus
3/1/99
Linda Presthus
3/1/99
Jessica Selleck (Student)
2/1/05
Jeff Sorem
3/1/04
Karla Sitek
3/1/99
Michael Weiss
2/1/03
PLANNING COMMISSION:
Stephen Brown
9/01
David Byron
2/1/90
Michael Fischer
12/7/04
Floyd Grabiel
2/1/05
i
John Lonsbury
2/1/97
Helen McClelland
2/9/76
David Runyan
2/1/70
Michael Schroeder
12/7/04
Geoffrey Workinger
12/21/87
RECYCLING /SOLID WASTE
COMMISSION
Tim Brownell
2/1/03
William Bryan
2/1/02
Katherine Frey
2/1/93
Mariko Hanson (Student)
2/1/05
Inna Hays
2/1/90.
Dan Rasmus
2/1/05
TRANSPORTATION
COMMISSION:
Joni Kelly Bennett
12/03
Dean Dovolis
12/03
Warren Plante
12/03
Fred Richards
12/03
Marie Thorpe
12/03
Les Wanninger
12/03
Jean White
12/03
ZONING BOARD OF
APPEALS:
Rodney Hardy
2/1/97
Michael Lewis
8/1/77
Edward Schwartzbauer
2/1/02
William Skallerud
2/1/96
Rose -Mary Utne
3/16/81
Mary Vasaly
2/1/02
Term Limits for Volunteer Positions
Currently there is no time limit on how long an appointed volunteer position is filled by
one person.
As with any entity, if a community wants to be a vital and energetic community that is
capable of updating itself, it must be receptive to new ideas and input. If there are
appointed positions within that community that are not subject to change or that have not
updated in many years, that energy and flexibility can wane. While these positions are
certainly not earth - shaking, lack of updating and change can have a subtle effect and can
certainly limit input of new ideas that deserve consideration. Appointed volunteers who
have contributed in the same capacity for many years deserve to be recognized for their
wonderful contributions, but they also should not be expected to carry on into perpetuity.
Edina has always been a community of many generous residents - -- generous with their
time and resources. It seems unlikely that dedicated and knowledgeable volunteers
couldn't be found to fill positions of those who have been in one position for many years.
A term limit of 6 - 8 years could be very beneficial. As the end of their term nears, the
current volunteer could share their expertise with others who they could recommend for
their role to carry on their work. That doesn't of course mean a clone - replacement, but a
sharing of knowledge and expertise that has worked in the past, leaving the mayor with
some recommendations for a new volunteer with some background to carry out their
goals and ideas.
Martha Rice
4501 Lakeview Dr.
Edina
O
ti J�
•
,171
to
O
'y
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
Agenda Item IV.D.
From: GORDON L. HUGHES
Consent ❑
CITY MANAGER
Information Only ❑
Date: APRIL 5 2005
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
To Council
Subject: PUBLIC HEARING
°❑
Motion
GUIDELINES
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
Discussion
REPORT: °
At the last meeting, the Council directed me to prepare background information about
establishing more formal procedures for public hearings. Attached is a thorough review of this
topic that was recently undertaken by the City of Eden Prairie. Minnesota cities as well as
jurisdictions outside of the state were included in this survey.
Although the Edina City Council has not adopted formal written policies concerning hearings,
informal guidelines are included in the "Welcome to a Meeting of the Edina City Council"
brochure, which is provided to meeting attendees. This brochure includes the following guidelines,,
which I have paraphrased:
• You may speak at hearings provided your comments are relevant to the discussion.
• When addressing the Council, stand at the podium and begin your presentation by stating
your name and address.
• Present petitions, letters or printed material. to the Clerk prior to beginning your
presentation.
• Please refrain from applause or other unnecessary disturbances. ,
• After all have spoken, the Council will close the hearing.
o °
1
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION - PUBLIC- HEARING GUIDELINES
April 5, 2005
In addition to the above guidelines, rules that are commonly used by other jurisdictions include:
1) A time limit for speakers, which may be extended if an individual is speaking on .behalf
of a group whose individual members will not be testifying
2). No individual may speak a second time until everyone has had an opportunity to speak
for the first time, and
3) An "encouragement" that individuals refrain from unduly repeating previous testimony
by others. Based on Eden Prairie's research, the most common rule imposed by other jurisdictions
is a time limit for speakers. Some jurisdictions, such as the Edina Public Schools, ask that
individuals sign up. in advance if they wish to address the Council or Board.
On a related note, it would also be appropriate for the Council to discuss protocols with respect to
the "Concerns of Residents" portion of the agenda. In some cases, individuals . have used this
portion of the agenda to conduct, in effect, a de facto public hearing on a particular issue. Some
cities have successfully, adopted a more informal approach to receiving resident concerns. Under
such a system, "Concerns of Residents" would be removed from the agenda and instead would be
considered, by the Council prior to„ the start of the regular, televised meeting, say at 6:30 pm.
Residents wishing to bring a concern to the Council would be asked to sign up in advance, if
possible. (This requirement might allow the staff the opportunity to be prepared with background
information.) As with public hearings, residents would be given a limited period of time to present
their. issue. "Concerns of Residents" would end promptly. at 7:00 pm with the start of the regular
meeting.
I recommend that the Council discuss these issues at the April 5`" meeting. I will be glad to
provide additional information at your request.
2
Protocols for Public Hearings
City of Eden Prairie
Michael Barone, Assistant to the City Manager
February 1, 2005
Proiect Overview.
Public bodies, such as City Councils and/or Planning Commissions, are required by law
to hold public hearings to properly conduct their business. In Eden Prairie, most issues
that require public hearings are generally not very contentious. But the question given
for research and analysis was to find out how. other municipalities deal with their public
hearings, and more specifically, find out if there are any protocols or procedures that are
simple and straightforward that would be worth considering in Eden Prairie.
The following communities in the metropolitan area were surveyed for response -. -.
Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Park, Chanhassen, Eagan, Lakeville, Minnetonka, Northfield,
Roseville, and Woodbury. An internet search was also conducted, and information was
found from Bellevue, Washington; the Municipal District of Rocky View in Calgary,
Alberta, Canada; Rock Hill, South Carolina; and the State of Texas State Board of
Education. Additional information on this subject was also gathered from the Municipal
Research & Service Center of the state of Washington.
Jurisdiction Information
The following information was gathered from local jurisdictions. The summary for each
community notes if a jurisdiction has a formal policy or procedure in place, or if it
utilizes informal guidelines for public hearings. Also included is information on any time
restrictions, if applicable, or the tactics used by the Mayor or Presiding Officer of the
meeting to control the length of time for speaker presentations.
Jurisdictions in the Twin Cities metropolitan area
Brooklyn Center
The City of Brooklyn Center City Council adopted a City Council handbook a few years
ago, and that handbook includes a protocol on public hearings. No time restrictions are
included in the handbook to limit speaker presentations at a public hearing.
Brooklyn Park
The City of Brooklyn Park adopted an "Elected Officials Rules of Procedure and Code of
Conduct" in June 2002. Contained within the `Rules and Code' information is a section
that discusses restrictions on public input and has a protocol for public hearings. A
general 3. to 5 minute time restriction is in place to limit speaker presentations, but the
Mayor has the discretion to determine how much time is appropriate, based on their
responsibility of running an efficient public meeting.
Chanhassen
The City of Chanhassen has an informal set of guidelines that they make available to the
public as they visit to participate in a public meeting or public hearing. These informal
guidelines discuss general expectations and behavior for speakers. A 5. minute time,
restriction is included in the guidelines to limit speaker presentations, but the Mayor has
the discretion to grant additional time for a speaker to talk.
Eagan
The City of Eagan has never adopted a formal or informal set of rules /protocols to govern
speakers for public meetings or public hearings, and also does not have an informal set of
guidelines for public meetings or.public. hearings, either.
Lakeville
The City of Lakeville City. Clerk said that there are. very few public hearings at the City
Council, with most public hearings held at the Planning Commission. As designated by
the Lakeville City Council, the Lakeville Planning Commission conducts Public Hearings
on all land use applications.. The Lakeville Planning Commission has an informal set of
guidelines that are available to those attending their Planning Commission meetings, and
these guidelines discuss general expectations and behavior for speakers. No time
restrictions are included in the guidelines,to limit speaker presentations at a public
hearing.
Minnetonka
The City of Minnetonka City Council adopted a "City Council Rules of Procedure" a
number of years ago that provides guidelines for the conduct of public business by or on
behalf of the City Council.. No time restrictions are included to limit speaker .
presentations at a public hearing, but the Mayor does have the discretion to limit the time
available for public.comment.
Northfield
The City of Northfield has a formal procedure in place for Public Hearings. Northfield
gives citizens speaking at a public hearing a 3 minute time limit per item.. Citizens may
speak more than once on a topic provided everyone has had an opportunity to. speak.
Roseville
The City of Roseville, in August 2004, included a set of Meeting Guidelines in the
introductory section of each City Council Agenda. These are general expectations and
norms of behavior for Councihnember's, not for the public. Roseville has never adopted
a formal or informal set of rules or protocols to govern speakers for public meetings or
public hearings.
Woodbury.
The City of Woodbury is now in the process of assembling a formal procedure for
conducting public hearings that would apply for their City Council and any other
subordinate board or commission that may have public hearings under their jurisdiction.
This formal procedure went before the Woodbury City. Council in September 2004 for
review. Within the proposed formal procedure is a 2 minute time restriction to limit
speaker presentations at public hearings.
Jurisdictions Outside of Minnesota
Bellevue, Washington .
The City of Bellevue, Washington, has a set of guidelines that they make available to the
public as they visit to participate in a public meeting or a public hearing.. These
guidelines discuss general expectations and norms of behavior for speakers. A 3 minute
time limit is in place, or 5 minutes if you are representing the official position of a
recognized organization, to control the length of speaker presentations.
Municipal District of Rocky View — Calgary, Alberta, Canada
This governing body has a formal public hearing procedure to govern their Council
public hearings. A 5 minute time limit is in place if you are speaking on behalf of
yourself, and a 10 minute time limit is in place if you speak for a group to control the
length of speaker presentations.
Rock Hill, South Carolina
This city has adopted a formal procedure to govern public hearings for their Planning
Commission. A 3 minute time limit is in place to address the Commission, and speakers
will receive,a 30- second warning from the Chair when they have 30 seconds remaining
on their time limit to conclude their remarks. When a speaker is notified that their time is
up, they must stop speaking immediately.
State of Texas State Board of Education
The state of Texas State Board of Education ( TSBOE) has provided. a procedure for
public hearings to those coming before that body. Before a meeting that includes public
hearings, the TSBOE determines the set length of time that testimony will be allowed per
individual testifying at the meeting (3 minutes, 5 minutes, etc.) on a particular public
hearing item.. They have the option to determine different lengths of time for any public
hearings on their Agenda (3 minute time limit for Item A, 5 minute time limit for Item B,
etc.), depending on the subject at hand. As a general guideline, three minutes is allotted
per speaker, and the presenter is signaled when one minute is .left. Time will be called
when the remaining minute has expired and the presenter will be allowed to finish the
sentence in progress.
Municipal Research & Service Center of the state of Washington
The MRSC of the state of Washington had some very interesting information as written
by a legal consultant a few years ago. This information was intended to be used as a
guideline for cities in the state of Washington.
The MRSC states the following: That there are two basic requirements of a public
meeting and they are (1) that the public be notified and (2) that the public be allowed to
attend. Although a public hearing is also a public meeting, the main purpose of most
pubic hearings is to. obtain public testimony or comment. A public hearing may occur as
part of a regular or special meeting, or it may be the sole purpose of the meeting, with no
other matters addressed. The MRSC also recommends that time limits should be placed
on individual comments if many people are intending to speak.
The City of Eden Prairie
Eden Prairie provides visitors to the Council Chambers a brochure entitled "Welcome to
your City Council Meeting.". This brochure is on a rack just outside the main entrance to
the City Council Chambers, and is intended as a guide to visitors wishing to speak before
the Council, and addresses the subject of public hearings, as well.
The brochure describes, in general, the procedure that will be followed during a public
hearing. It also has some informal guidelines for addressing the City Council. These
guidelines are:
o State your name and address before starting your remarks. Speak clearly and talk
directly into the microphone at the speaker's podium.
o Direct all remarks to the Mayor. The Mayor may wish to refer any questions to the
proper Councilmember or to staff.
o Keep your comments brief, and do not repeat comments already made.
o Individuals may speak, but cannot make motions or otherwise participate in the
meeting.
o A single spokesperson is usually encouraged to. express the views of a large group.
o Signs, cheering, and clapping are not allowed in order to maintain a comfortable
environment.
Common Themes
In my discussions with local municipal representatives, and in reviewing the materials
received from these cities and from other cities outside of Minnesota, there were some
common themes for having a successful public meeting or public hearing.
Instead of repeating these common themes, city after city, I have summarized them
below. Some items are seen in the Eden Prairie guidelines just mentioned above. These
items are the ones most commonly seen to have a successful public meeting or public
hearing:
Create a non - threatening and positive environment for the meeting; which
includes not allowing signs, cheering, clapping, or booing.
Have all speakers identify themselves before speaking.
Direct all questions to the Mayor or Presiding Officer of the meeting, not directly
to any specific Council or Board member or City staff.
• Have the Mayor or Presiding Officer determine who will answer a question asked
by a speaker.
• Do not have any person speak a second time until everyone that wishes to speak
has been able to do so for the first time.
• Those speaking should not repeat remarks or points of view already made by a
previous speaker.
• Comments in the public meeting should be limited to the subject under
consideration.
• The Mayor or Presiding Officer has the responsibility to run an efficient public
meeting and/or public hearing, and has the discretion to modify the public
meeting or public hearing process, within legal restraints, in order to make the
meeting run smoothly.
• The Mayor or Presiding Officer has the power to determine whether a speaker has
gone beyond reasonable standards of courtesy in their remarks, and can entertain
and rule on objections from other members of the Council or Board on this
ground.
• The audience may not comment during the Council or Boards deliberations unless
requested by the Mayor or Presiding Officer for more information.
Conclusion
There are some jurisdictions that have created formal procedures for public hearings that
do include a time limit for speakers, with the typical time limit is in the three to five
minute range. Some time limits are determined by whether or not the speaker is speaking
for themselves or on the behalf of a group, with more time allotted if speaking on behalf
of a group.
Public hearing procedures do allow the Mayor or Presiding Officer to have some
discretion on limiting or extending the allotted time to speak. This discretion is usually
based on the length of the Agenda or the complexity and/or level of controversy
anticipated for the public hearing item.
To keep the pace of a public hearing moving, most jurisdictions have the Mayor or
Presiding Officer notify speakers with a verbal cue when they are getting near the end of
their allotted time to speak.
,
To:
less
i U 1,
REPORT/RE C OMMENDATION
Mayor Hovland and,members of Agenda Item IV. E.
the Edina City Council.
From: John Keprios, Direc Consent ® °
Park & Recreation Dep nt Information Only
Date: April 51 2005 , 'Mgr. Recommends ❑ � To HRA
Subject: 2005 Braemar Inspection Tour
® To Council
® Motion
❑Resolution'
Ordinance
❑ Discussion
RECOMMENDATION:
The Edina Park Board recommends that the Council approve the 40h Annual Braemar
Inspection Tour, scheduled for Tuesday, July 12, 2005, for those invited guests shown
below. The event will include an I' 84 ole round of golf and use of golf cars followed by
dinner at Braemar Golf Course. The actual cost of food, beverage and golf event prizes
will be covered through a- user .fee.
INFO/BACKGROUND:
For 39 years, the Edina City Council has extended an invitation to the following groups
to gather for an 18 -hole round of golf, including golf car, followed by a dinner and
nominal golf event prizes:
Current members of "
• Art Center Board °
• . Community Health Services Advisory Committee
•, Edina Resource Center`, .
• Construction Board of Appeals
• Heritage Preservation Board
°
2
• Housing and Redevelopment Authority
• Human Relations Commission
• . Park Board-
Planning Commission
• Recycling and Solid Waste Commission
• Zoning Board of Appeals
• Edina Community Foundation
• East Edina Housing Foundation
.• Edina Transportation Commission
• Edina Board of Education
• Representative City Staff
And all former members of:
• Edina Park Board
• . Edina City Council
Edina City Attorneys
The Edina Park Board- prop oses that the.City Council approve the 40'h Annual Braemar
Inspection Tour „for those invited guests listed above and that the event include an 18 -hole
round of golf and use of golf cars followed by dinner at Braemar Golf Course. The event
is scheduled `for Tuesday., July 12, 2005. Staff will charge a fee for all those who attend
the dinner.. The fee will be set a level that will cover the cost of all food, beverages, and
golf event prizes.
a
a
n
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Debra Mangen
City Clerk
Date: April 5, 2005
Subject: ON'SALE INTOXICATING,
AND SUNDAY SALE LIQUOR
LICENSES - IKASU
0
KEPOK'1 /KhC OMMEN VA ION
Agenda Item,IV.F.
Consent
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
® To Council
Action ® Motion
Resolution
Ordinance
Discussion
Recommendation:
Council approval of On -Sale Intoxicating and Sunday Sale Liquor License renewals for Ikasu Sushi
Bar and Lounge.
Info/Background:
Yang Companies LLC dba Ikasu Sushi Bar, and Lounge applied for their liquor license on March 25,
2005. They filed the necessary applications and paid all applicable fees. Staff has completed their
review and Chief Siitari s memo is attached for review. We have notified them that their license
expired as of the 31St of March and they are currently not serving liquor until the Council acts upon
their renewal application. Staff would recommend approval of the Ikasu licenses and will submit
the necessary documentation to the State on their behalf.
Memo
To: Deb Mangen, City Clerk
From: Mike Siitari, Police Chief
Date: March 31, 2005 v
Re: Liquor License Renewal lkasu Sushi Bar & Lounge
Background checks have been completed for the 2005 -2006 licensing period for Ikasu Sushi Bar &
Lounge's 'On -Sale Intoxicating and Sunday Sale' liquor license.
Ikasu Sushi Bar & Lounge complies with City Code. There was in incident in February of 2005 in which
three patrons were cited for underage consumption and the owner was arrested for obstructing legal
process. The owner has pled not guilty and has an April court date to resolve his case. This appears
to be an isolated incident that does not warrant denial of the license. I, am recommending approval of
this renewal application.
• Page 1
owe
lase
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
II To: Mayor & City Council
Agenda Item IV.G.
From: Mike Siitari, Police Chief Consent ❑
11
Information Only ❑
Date: April 1, 2005 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
® To Council
Subject: Ikasu Dance Permit ® Motion
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑, Discussion
° RECOMMENDATION:
Renew the Ikasu Sushi Bar & Lounge Public Dance Permit for one year.
INFO /BACKGROUND:
The Ikasu Sushi Bar and Lounge has held a dance permit since September of 2003. Ikasu has
applied for a renewal of their permit: There have been no problems at Ikasu related to the dance
permit. The application requests a dance permit for Monday through Sunday, 9:00 PM to 1:00 AM.
This is an expansion on their original request for Thursday through Sunday, 10:00 PM to 1:00 AM.
I would have concerns if Ikasu was becoming a nightly dance club but the owner has only held
dances a few times in the last year. I recommend renewal with the previous condition that security
personnel approved by the Chief of Police must be on duty when Ikasu operates as a dance club.
This condition is authorized by City Code, Section 200.,06:
200.06 Police Protection. If required by the Council, the applicant shall provide, at the
applicant's expense, policing of the immediate and surrounding area of the building or area of
the public dancing place by security personnel approved by the Police Chief. The failure to
provide such policing shall constitute grounds for the immediate suspension or revocation of
the permit.
O
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
REPORTIRECOMMENDATION
Mayor Hovland and me bers of
Agenda Item
G IV. H.
the Edina City Council
°
John Keprios, Direc
Consent
Park &Recreation Dep ent
Information Only
❑
April 5, 2005
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
®
To Council
Replacement Wetland Declaration
®
Motion °
For Braemar Golf Course 17`h `Tee.
❑
Resolution
°
❑
Ordinance
°
Discussion
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the Replacement Wetlands Declaration Agreement,
Consent to Replacement Wetland, and Affidavit of Landowner as required by the
Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act of 1991 and directed by the Nine Mile Creek
Watershed District, c/o Barr Engineering Company.
INFOBACKGROUND:
The proposed development of the Braemar Golf Course 17`h tee project requires
encroachment onto existing wetlands. As required by the Minnesota Wetland
Conservation Act of 1991, we must in turn replace these wetlands by creating new
wetlands and/or upland buffer areas of permanent native and noninvasive dominated
vegetation. The total amount of wetlands to be filled is 3,532 square feet. As shown on
the Wetland Mitigation Plan drawn by Barr Engineering, the plan calls for creation of
12,200 square feet of wetland mitigation of which just over 3,000 square feet will be
upland buffer area consisting of permanent native and noninvasive dominated vegetation.
The Nine Mile Creek Watershed District is charged with the approval of the Replacement
Plan. Their process demands that the City of Edina approve the "Declaration of
Restrictions and Covenants for Site Specific Wetland Replacement" document, in part of
which states that the City of Edina:
• Owns the property where wetlands are being filled and created.
• ` Agrees to maintain this area for an unlimited duration.
• . Declares that no ether entities have a lien or easement on this property.
• Will allow authorized parties reasonable access to inspect the replacement
wetlands.
• Will pay for the creation and all maintenance of the replacement wetlands.
• Shall record or file this Declaration and pay all costs associated with recording or
filing, and provide proof of filing or recording to the Nine Mile Creek Watershed
District.
The reason for the proposed project is to make the par -three 17th golf hole at Braemar
Golf Course more playable, eliminate an existing safety hazard, and offer a more
reasonable challenge for the average golfer. The 17th hole is a par 3 hole to which
players must hit over Nine Mile Creek. From this location, the hole distance is over 210
yards (mostly over water), which is a very difficult distance for many players. There is
another existing tee box that is located on the south side of Nine Mile Creek that makes
for a distance of only 150 yards, which lacks challenge since there is no water hazard
from that direction. An additional tee box (to the north), also exists for the 17th hole,
which is slightly more challenging; however, it poses a serious safety concern as many
golf balls land on the tee from the players hitting their second shot on the 16th hole. In
order to make the 17th hole a reasonable challenge for the average golfer and minimize
the use of the more hazardous northern tee, staff proposes to extend the 17th hole tee box
by approximately 20 yards on the south side of the creek.
The Nine Mile Creek Watershed District will act on the wetland replacement proposal
after the Declaration is approved and signed by the City of Edina. If Council approves
the Declaration, the project would likely be completed by the end of July of 2005.
(Above Space is Reserved for Recording Information
Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act
Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Site Specific Wetland Replacement
Replacement Wetland Declarant: City of Edina
General Location of Replacement: Sec. 7 Twp. 116N, Rge.21 W, County of Hennepin
This Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Site Specific Wetland Replacement
Wetland (Declaration) is made this day of by the undersigned Declarant:
RECITALS
A. The Declarant holds the fee title or perpetual easement on the real property
described in Exhibit A, attached hereto.
B. This real property is the site of a Replacement Wetland, as defined in Minnesota
Rules 8420.0110, subp. 40. Exhibit B, attached hereto, is a map or survey of the subject
Replacement Wetland.
C. The Declarant is seeking approval of (1) a replacement plan under Minnesota
Statutes section 103G.222.
D. The Replacement Wetland is subject to the Wetland Conservation Act of 1991, as
amended, Minnesota Statutes section 103G.222 et sea.. and all other provisions of law that apply
to wetlands, except that the exemptions in Minnesota Statutes section 103G.2241 do not apply to
the Replacement Wetland, pursuant to Minnesota Rules 8420.0115.
E. The Local Government Unit (LGU) charged with approval of the Replacement Plan is
Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, whose address is Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, c% Barr
Engineering CompmL 4700 West 77h Street. Minneapolis Minnesota 55435 -4803
F. All references in this instrument to Minnesota Statutes and Rules are to the Statutes and
Page 1 of 4
BWSR_Form wCA_ Replacement_]I(Decl_ResCov).doc (April 2003)
Rules currently in effect and as amended or renumbered in the future.
RESTRICTIONS AND COVENANTS
The Declarant makes the following declaration of restrictions and covenants for the
Replacement Wetland. These restrictions and covenants shall run with the land, and bind
Declarant, and Declarant's heirs, successors, and assigns:
1. The Declarant shall maintain a Replacement Wetland of the size and type
specified in the replacement plan approved by the LGU and on file at the offices of the LGU.
Declarant shall not make any use of the Replacement Wetland that would adversely affect the
functions or values of the wetland as determined by Minnesota Rules 8420.0540, subp. 10, and
as specified in the replacement plan.
2. Declarant shall pay the costs of maintenance, repairs, reconstruction, and
replacement of the Replacement Wetland, which the LGU or the State of Minnesota through the
Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources may deem necessary to comply with the
specifications for the Replacement Wetland in the approved replacement plan.
3. Declarant grants to the LGU, the State of Minnesota, and the agents and
employees of the LGU and the State of Minnesota, reasonable access to the Replacement
Wetland for inspection, monitoring, and enforcement purposes. This Declaration grants no
access to or entry on the lands described to the general public. ,
4. Declarant represents that he or she has a fee simple or easement interest in the
land on which the Replacement Wetland is or will be located. Declarant represents that he or she
has obtained the consent of all other parties who may have an interest in the land on which the
Replacement Wetland is or will be located to the creation of the restrictions and covenants
herein, and that, all such parties have agreed in writing to subordinate their interests to these
restrictions and covenants, pursuant to the attached Consent and Subordination Agreement(s).
5. Declarant shall record or file this Declaration, pay all costs associated with
recording or filing, and provide proof of recording or filing to the LGU. If this Declaration is
given pursuant to a replacement plan, such proof shall be provided to the LGU before proceeding
with construction of the Replacement Wetland.
6. Acknowledge that this Easement shall be unlimited in duration, without being re-
recorded. This Easement shall be deemed to be a perpetual conservation easement pursuant to
Minn. Stat. ch. 84C.
7. If the replacement plan approved by the LGU and on file at its offices requires the
establishment of areas of native vegetative cover, the term "Replacement Wetland" as used in
this Declaration shall also include the required areas of permanent vegetative cover, even if such
areas are not wetlands. All provisions of this Declaration that apply to the Replacement Wetland
shall apply equally to the required areas of native vegetative cover. In addition, the Declarant:
Page 2 of 4
BWSR_Form_WCA_Replacement II(Decl_ResCov).doc (April 2003)
(a) Shall comply with the applicable requirements of Minnesota Rules 8420.0540,
subpart 2.1);
(b) Shall, at Declarant's cost, establish and maintain permanent vegetative cover on areas
specified in the replacement plan for native vegetative cover, including any necessary planting
and replanting thereof, and other conservation practices, in accordance with the replacement
plan;
(c) Shall not produce agricultural crops on the areas specified in the replacement plan;
(d) Shall not graze livestock on the areas specified in the replacement plan or;
(e) Shall not place any materials, substances, or other objects, nor erector construct any type
of structure, temporary or permanent, on the areas specified in the replacement plan, except as
provided in the replacement plan;
(f) Shall, at Declarant's cost, be responsible for weed control by complying with noxious
weed control laws and emergency control of pests necessary to protect the public health on the areas
specified in the replacement plan; and
(g) Shall comply with any other requirements or restrictions specified in the replacement
plan, including, but not limited to, haying, mowing, timber management or other vegetative t
alterations that do not enhance or would degrade the ecological functions and values of the
replacement site.
8. This Declaration may be modified only by the joint written approval of the LGU
and the State of Minnesota through the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources. If the
Replacement Wetland has been used to mitigate wetland losses under the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (or successor agency) must also agree
to the modification in writing. Such modification may include the release of land contained in
the legal description above, if it is determined that non - wetland areas have been encumbered by
this Declaration, unless the approved replacement plan designates these non - wetland areas for
establishment of permanent vegetative cover.
9. This Declaration may be enforced, at law or in equity, by the LGU, or by the State of
Minnesota. The LGU and the State of Minnesota shall be entitled to recover an award of reasonable
attorneys fees from Declarant in any action to enforce this Declaration. The right to enforce the
terms of this Declaration is not waived or forfeited by any forbearance or failure to act on the part of
the State or LGU. If the subject replacement area is to be used partially or wholly to fulfill permit
requirements under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act or a federal farm program, then the
provisions of this Declaration that run to the State or the LGU may also be enforced by the United
States of America in a court of competent jurisdiction.
10. This Declaration must be recorded and proof of recording submitted to the
Page 3 of 4
13 WSR_Form_WCA_Replacement_ I I (Decl_ResCov).doc (April 2003)
LGU or other regulatory authority in order to be valid.
Signature of Declarant
Signature of Declarant
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
..ss.
COUNTY OF, Hennepin),
This instrument was acknowledged before me on (date) by
(name(s) of person(s).
(Signature of Notarial Officer)
(Title)
My commission expires:
Attachments: [X] Attachment A (legal description)
[X] Attachment B. (map or survey of Replacement Wetland)
This instrument drafted by:City of Edina
Page 4 of 4
BWSR_Form_WCA_Replacement_ I I (Decl_ResCov).doc (April 2003)
Exhibit A: Replacement Wetland Legal Description:
NEIA of the SWIA of the SETA of Section 7, Township 116 North, Range 21 West,
Hennepin County, city of Edina, within the bounds of the Braemar Golf Course.
P:\23\27\003\JDD\343—Braemar\Exhibit A.doc
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)ss
COUNTY OF Hennepin )
Wayne Houle for the city of Edina, the Affiant herein, being first duly sworn, deposes and says:
1. Affiant is the owner of land described as follows, to -wit:
(see attached legal description in Declaration)
2. Affiant is well - acquainted with the above - described land.
3. As of , 2005 , no persons were in possession of or
claiming title to said land other than Affiant.
4. There have been no improvements made during the one hundred twenty (120) days prior
to the above date for which any mechanics' liens might have arisen.
5. All taxes and assessments levied against the property have been paid when due, and such
property is free and clear of any tax lien except for current taxes not yet due or not yet delinquent.
6. No lien for unpaid income taxes has been filed or is outstanding against the property.
7. The land described above is free of all mortgages, easements, liens and other
encumbrances except as specified on the attached Form A -2 (Consent to Replacement Wetland).
8. No judgment or decree has been entered against Affiant that remains unsatisfied.
9. Affiant has not filed a bankruptcy petition nor had one filed against him under Title I I of
the United States Code.
Pagel of 2
BWSR Form WCA Replacement 12(Aff Landowners).doc (April 2003)
Further your Affiant sayeth not.
Subscribed and sworn to before me
this day of
Notary Public
Page 2 of 2
BWSR Form WCA Replacement 12(Aii Landowners).doc (April 2003)
WHEREAS, the City of Edina is the fee owner(s) of the following lands:
[Insert same legal description from Replacement Wetland
Declaration]NE1A of the SW1A of the SE 1/4 of Section 7, Township 116 North,
Range 21 West, Hennepin County, city of Edina, within the bounds of the Braemar Golf Course.
AND WHEREAS, the undersigned, City of Edina, has an interest in the land pursuant to:
Mortgage
Utility Easement for utility line or pipeline
which runs through the Replacement Wetland
Drainage Easement for ditch, tile line or other
drainage system which runs through the
Replacement Wetland
Contract for Deed
Lien
Other (specify)
which document is dated , and was recorded on in the
Office of the County Recorder for Hennepin County, in Book , Page , as
Document No. ; and
WHEREAS, the fee owner or Landowner as defined in Minn. Rules part 8420.0110,
subp. 29 intends to restore or create a Replacement Wetland under Minn. Stat. § 103G.222 and
Minn. Rules part 8420.0530 or Minn Rules part 8420.0740, upon the land described above.
NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged, the undersigned hereby consents to the creation or restoration of the Replacement
Wetland. The undersigned acknowledges that its interest in the land on which the Replacement
Wetland is located shall be subject to all federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding
wetlands, including the Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Replacement Wetland that
is attached hereto.
-Page 1 of 2
BWSR Form WCA Replacement 13(Cons Repl).doc (April 2003)
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF,
document this day of
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS.
, the of the undersigned, has executed this
Title
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
COUNTY OFHenngpin )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , by
Notary Public
Notary Stamp or Seal
This instrument was drafted by:
Board of Water and Soil Resources
One West Water Street, Suite 200
St. Paul, Minnesota 55107
- Page 2 of 2
BWSR Form WCA Replacement 13(Cons Repl).doc (April 2003)
(
1
1
x 8 3 3. z _- - - -- - - --
�P�W: WERAND MITIGATION O
o m 4o
u.•
scArE « rEEr
17th TEE EXPANSION
mom= E 1- 7����♦�� T Lr.r7� BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
\ I
reDPOSEO AOpTNM/1 N6LIC VALUE ERp, ((5..00 yf.)
,NE K/LAIA) calson, rp1
UrLAND
" T k T1%
DOWHA ED VE `T `E ESTNT MM ANO NowVTo
WPLA TED KOCTAr ETo RE MW ADUCENT 10
E[MD[NENT T OF TO eK. C1Kpr MOT TO
W- ( 0 Kw2NT O M K. KniMO ClrtpT
Au• I>.ler yr.)
KIUK K1LNq FlLL SSJ2 yr. (reEV`OS[D � A,rN yf.)
uxuo u sn yr,
QEAlEO N[w KnAND CAEdT •1rcA (x.u. s.r. /• . yiT s.r.)
ilc 11ETlN1U CQVeplVAl10N KT ALLOw3 ra
x>: NK ra 1K eEStgA110N a nx xAtw•L
N1p10LOG1' eCEl1( ANO KOETAnON
®CIIEAI[e
wNeUt VALVE Cllmt ANEA (3.2W yr. /• gn U.)
"C KiLANO CONStIIWM ACT 4L FM
1SR PVC rpl M KE l Anl Of NAnK KaLTAnpI
—Ala' MEN KTLArO —1 AREAS
(err yr. ♦ 2MO &r.-Sr- 3147 S.F.)
�/
1 {f�
— Rff[I — -
- 830\-
ME -EMI N0 Cd J"
—ew—
rRaROSro calauls
—832—
AS -e T CMIT"S
17th TEE EXPANSION
mom= E 1- 7����♦�� T Lr.r7� BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
\ I
Barr Footer. Date. 3115/2005 5.05.43 PM File. I: Wrojectst23t271354\Braemar 17th Teet Gis \Prgect\replacement_location.mxd User: mew
Eden Prairie 1993 Quadrangle.
Replacement Wetland
0
Feet
800 400 0 800
Exhibit B
MAP OF REPLACEMENT WETLAND
Braemar Golf Course 17th Tee Expansion
City of Edina
Edina, MN
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: 5J- Steven L. Lillehaug, PE, PTOE
Assistant Engineer
Date: April 5, 2005
Subject: Receive Feasibility Study for
Schaefer Road Roadway
Improvement No. A -216,
Schaefer Circle Roadway
Improvement No. A -217 and
West 58 h Street Roadway
Improvement No. BA -328
Info /Background:
Agenda Item #
Consent
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends
Action
IV. I
❑ To H RA
® To Council
® Motion
® Resolution
❑Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Schaefer Road Improvement No. A -216 — Receive Feasibility Study for the Schaefer Road
roadway and utility project. The Feasibility Study is attached along with all correspondence received
to date. The public hearing and ordering for this project is scheduled for April 19, 2005.
Schaefer Circle Improvement No. A -217 — Receive Feasibility Study for the Schaefer Circle
roadway and utility project. The Feasibility Study is attached along with all correspondence received
to date. The public hearing and ordering for this project is scheduled for April 19, 2005.
West 58th Street Improvement No. BA -328 — Receive Feasibility Study for the Wet 580' Street
roadway and utility project. The Feasibility Study is attached along with all correspondence received
to date. The public hearing and ordering for this project is scheduled for April 19, 2005.
uo
G: \Engineering \Improvements \BA328 -West 58th St\ CORRESPONDENCE\ Misc\ BA326- A216- A217_RR_Feasibility.doc
w9�N�,r
o� e FEASIBILITY STUDY — A216
Cn
a0 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF EDINA
STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
SCHAEFER ROAD
MARCH 31, 2005
LOCATION: The Schaefer Road project extends from Interlachen Boulevard to Westwood
Court (see Figure 1).
6535
4900
4901
4920 4921
5111
4904
5020
929 6516
4924 4925
5024 5112 -
5117
4905 6408 6400
01 6520
4928 4929
6424
4909 i
5116
5175
INTERLACHEN
29 6547
6519 6501
5200
6401
6220
6212 62pg 5204
6413
6409 6405
3 5008
5009
6229
8225 6221 6217 62 15 5216
5217
5004
5012
5013
5224
5221 5224
5016
5021
5225 5300
5008
5020
6404
5304
5025
5012
5100
6312
5304
6501 HAROLD WO
6301 6305
5101
6309
5106
5321 5311 5316
6313
6405
5016
5109
5112
5116
5117
5120
5125
c
5152 w
- a
5200
5201 5204
5200
5200 U
y
5204
5210
5205
5212
5209
5211
5
5216
11 5215
5215
'224
5220
5219
23 5219
5224
5224
5223
227 5231
5228
5227
5304
5305 6404 6400
5308
5309
5234 5238
5301
105 6401
6418 6412
4 6500
6424 6420
6409 5312
Figure 1. Project Area Map
6308 6304
6300
6228
6224
6212
6328
6320 6228
6201
5004
5000
d.502fi,
5008
5001
5012 5020
Project
Boundary
5C o X09
5021 5025 5101
5020
5320
5106
51t3
510 0
5111
5017
5020
5024 5112 -
5117
5117
5116
5175
5124
5200
5201
6220
6212 62pg 5204
8204 6200
5209 6231
6229
8225 6221 6217 62 15 5216
5217
8209
5220
5225
5224
5221 5224
5228
5225 5300
6300 6304
6308
5300
5304
ESTWOOD C T
5301 5308
6312
5304
6301 6305
6309
5331
5321 5311 5316
6313
6316
5320
Feasibility Study
Schaefer Road Imp. No. A -216
March 31, 2005
INITIATION & ISSUES: The Schaefer Road project was initiated partially by a resident request to
address drainage problems along the roadway. The Engineering Department
expanded this area and included the neighborhood as outlined in Figure 1 as
part of the City's planning process to update the infrastructure within this
neighborhood.
The following are existing features that present issues in determining the
feasibility of the project and are addressed in this report:
• Surface rainwater drainage issues
• Poor condition of existing pavement
• Existing landscaping, retaining walls, driveways, etc.
• Existing mature trees
EXISTING CONDITIONS: The roadway in this neighborhood was previously re- constructed in the early
1970's and the utilities (sanitary sewer, storm sewer and watermain) were
installed ranging from 1965 to 1993. The roadway width along Schaefer Road
varies from 27 -ft to 30 -ft with no curb and gutter and no sidewalks. The
pavement on Schaefer Road is in generally poor condition with very poor
conditions experienced along the edge of the roadways in many locations
(see Photo 1). The pavement throughout this neighborhood appears to be
approaching the end of its useful life while the costs to maintain and repair
the roadways are steadily increasing.
Photo 1. Existing Pavement Condition & Drainage Issues
k.
Page 2 of 6
• Feasibility Study
Schaefer Road Imp. No. A -216
March 31, 2005
PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS:
Schaefer Road generally consists of rolling terrain varying from 0.5% to 5.3%
slopes. There is some existing storm sewer in the area, but overall the
surface drainage is relatively poor with erosion problems along the edge of
the roadway in certain areas. The roadway remains in a wet condition most
of the summer due to the amount of sump pump discharge onto the roadway.
Watermain /water service breaks and sanitary sewer blockage occurrences
have been reported as minimal in this area. The private utilities in this
neighborhood are located both overhead and underground. Street lighting
consists of standard "cobra head" lights mounted on wood poles that are
located intermittently along Schaefer Road.
This project involves reconstructing the existing bituminous pavement and
base, replacing fire hydrants, and extending the storm sewer to
accommodate new sump pump drain tile where needed to allow the property
owners to connect their sump pump discharges directly into the storm sewer
system. This will eliminate the adjacent sump pump discharge directly onto
the roadway.
A neighborhood informational meeting was held on November 15, 2004 to
gather data and answer questions the homeowners had relating to the
project. Approximately four residents attended this meeting residing on
Schaefer Road.
A neighborhood survey was sent to learn the favorability of installing
decorative streetlights with this project and the favorability of installing traffic
calming measures in response to comments received at the information
meeting. Input from the survey and comments received throughout the
planning of this project have been included in this report as an attachment.
The results of the survey are shown in Table 1.
*Note: Based on a 1 to 3 ranking system. Traditional was most favored with the lowest
average ranking of 1.5. Only two returned surveys indicated rankings for lighting.
Table 1. Survey Results
The following is a summary regarding the survey results including staff's
recommendations:
• The majority of residents do not prefer installing decorative street lighting
— Staff does not recommend including decorative street lighting with this
project since the improvement is overwhelmingly not supported by the
property owners and a direct benefit to each property for this
improvement is difficult to substantiate.
Page 3 of 6
Returned
Prefer Decorative Street Lights
Prefer Traffic
Calming Measures
Total Surveys
Surveys
Yes
No
I Style*
Yes
No
Sent
Colonial
Acorn
Traditional
22
1 11
1
10
2.5
2
1.5
6
4
of Returned Surveys
1 50%
9%
91%
55%
36%
*Note: Based on a 1 to 3 ranking system. Traditional was most favored with the lowest
average ranking of 1.5. Only two returned surveys indicated rankings for lighting.
Table 1. Survey Results
The following is a summary regarding the survey results including staff's
recommendations:
• The majority of residents do not prefer installing decorative street lighting
— Staff does not recommend including decorative street lighting with this
project since the improvement is overwhelmingly not supported by the
property owners and a direct benefit to each property for this
improvement is difficult to substantiate.
Page 3 of 6
Feasibility Study
Schaefer Road Imp. No. A -216
March 31, 2005
The majority of residents prefer implementing traffic calming measures in
this neighborhood — A traffic survey was performed on Schaefer Road in
July 1999. The Monday through Friday average daily traffic volume was
1,049 vehicles per day and the 851h- percentile speed was 34.5 mph. The
vehicle volume is relatively high for a local road with speeds exceeding 30
mph; however, these volumes and speeds are very typical throughout
Edina neighborhoods on local roadways. Staff recommends the residents
file an application for traffic calming in accordance with the Transportation
Commission Policy and the Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan. It is
not anticipated that traffic calming measures would be included with this
construction project due to the procedure and schedule as outlined in the
Policy.
The proposed roadway width is 28 -ft, which closely matches the existing
width and helps minimize impacts to the surrounding topography and
landscaping features (see Figure 2). Trees will be protected and impacts to
the trees will be minimized.
Figure 2. Proposed Project Layout
Staff is continuing to analyze the utility repairs /replacements and will include
the needed improvements with the final plans. Other utility activities may
include replacement of gas mains within the neighborhood, which is
determined and coordinated by the local gas utility company.
Page 4 of 6
Feasibility Study
Schaefer Road Imp. No. A -216
March 31, 2005
RIGHT -OF -WAY
& EASEMENTS The right -of -way along Schaefer Road is typically 60 feet wide. All proposed
improvements stay within this right -of -way and no additional easement
requirements are anticipated.
FEASIBILITY: This project is feasible from an engineering and City standpoint.
PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $188,000. The total cost includes
indirect costs of 15% for engineering _and clerical costs and 7.5% for first year
finance costs. The estimated construction cost does not include storm sewer
or other utility improvements. Final utility improvements will be determined
during the final design and will be funded through the respective utility fund.
Funding for the entire project will be from a combination of special
assessment and utility funds.
ASSESSMENTS: A special assessment of approximately $9,400 per residential equivalent
unit or assessable lot will be levied against residents adjacent to the
neighborhood's roadways. The justification for assessments is attributed to
properties receiving benefit of the new pavement. The assessable lot is
based on a detached single family home. Properties that abut the project and
have access with their side or rear yards will be assessed 1/3 of the
assessable unit cost (see Figure 3).
PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule is feasible from an Engineering standpoint:
ATTACHMENTS:
Council Orders Public Hearing .......... ..........................March 15, 2005
Receive Feasibility Report .................... ..........................April 5, 2005
Public Hearing ........................... ............................... April 19, 2005
Bid Opening ................................:... ............................... May 2005
Award Contract ..... ............................... ...........................June 2005
Begin Construction .......................... ............................... June 2005
Complete Construction ......................... ........................October 2005
• Information Meeting Attendance List and Comments
• Survey Results and Comments
• Preliminary Assessment Roll
Page 5 of 6
Feasibility Study
Schaefer Road Imp. No. A -216
March 31, 2005
6535 49 ._ ...
01
; 'r - 6308 6304
4920 � [499221 6300 4904 6228
329 6516 4905 4924 4925 6408 64 6224
� 28 6212
131 6520 4928 - 49 6424 4909 9�
6320 6228
INTER LAC HEN
■
!29 6547
6519 6501
6401
■
= 5004 5000
6321
6201
3 5008
6413
5009
6409 6405 ■
US
= 5008
5004
5012
5013
•
•
5011 t 5001
•
p.s -
:
5016
■ 5008
50, 2
5017 Z
5020
5021
ai
i Project
5020
6 "04:
5021 i Boundary
5025
5012
i 5r o su09
5100
■
6501HAROLD WO • rr
•.
5025 i 5020
502, 5025 5101
5101
.. 1//rrr////q
5108
5108
6405 :
•
5109
■ 5018
i
■
51 11 i
5108
5111
5112
=
• 501!
5020
�■rUMrrrrrr
!!
/rrr�
_
:
■
5024 5112
5117
5116
5117
5117
so
5176
•
5120
5125 1
K
5152 W
■
5125 :
5124
=rrrrNry
LL
_ ■
5200
•
5201 5204 5200 i
5200
•
5201 6220
5200
5204
5210 i
6212 6208 5204
5205
Yr•r /NA
-
■ ■ /Nr/
6231
6204 6200
5212 �
5209
5209
5211 =
2* 196229
4.229
5216
6225 6221 6217 6215 6209 5216
5217
11 5215
5215 =
j
5224
_ ■
t/Nrrr•�
5220
5220 =
5225 5224
5221 5224
5219
5219
5224
A
'23
5224
5223.0
IN 5228
6300 6304 6308
5225 5300
5227 5231
1/■////rr/r/rr//////////r■
irrr
•
/ /rrri 5300
5304
5228
5304 5305 6404 6400 WESTWOOD CT
5227
5301 5308
6312 5304
6301 6305
5234 5238
5308
5301
5309
Assessments
6416 6412
6401
6405
5331
6309 6313 6316
$3,150.00
X504 6500
6'124 6420
6409 5312
$9,400,00
6390 53
Figure 3. Preliminary Assessment Map
Page 6 of 6
SIGN IN SHEET - INIORMATION MEETING
1 and Ridge Rd.
November 15, 2004
(Please print legibly - Thank you!)
'Address
r �
�
I
6WEVIAOS
r �r �,
_
� l -'r -' L 5 .._ 2'�iliil�'3�C•(.7�5 `.� "JF+?,SnJI
_MUM i . •
UM M
i ,A
p6%k
Rp- cetve4
ui i s'oH b�j
�S+tW L
QUESTION / COMMENT CARD
�nld�er w6lem avtd eresion ay,4- -lb !away er
AW GZ(j� �Q 'p.°'; nd (- cxtee�' �Fhat 4 I, �s has heen aA
,v # A nkeh lctn anal nea u-af d +-o have �4- .4,4d res sed
wA d �%e �S�h Qe � QA r Oro i e c� .
�� I n� T k6ow 520 Soh ne fer .
Name Q Address
PLEASE PRINT PLEASE PRINT
. p 6we- ca l
QUESTION / COMMENT CARD
Name Ma fAho` S�� , I f � Address Soil SLkae r RJ -
PLEASE PRINT PLEASE PRINT
945-3-3-70
Phone Conversation on November 17, 2004 Steve L.
Ed Glickman 952 - 935 -0625 5217 Schaefer Rd.
• DRAIN TILE /STORM SEWER WILL BE INSTALLED WITH RDWY PROJECT TO
ACCOMMODATE HIS BACKYARD POND PUMPING ONTO THE STREET.
• WOULD LIKE US TO TAKE A LOOK AT PONDING THAT OCCURS IN HIS FRONT
YARD. CURRENTLY AN INFILTRATION TYPE SYSTEM. HE MAY POSSIBLY PUT
IN A SUMP PUMP.
• DISCUSSED A HUGE 200 YR OLD COTTON WOOD TREE.
• HIS NEIGHBOR (HARRY) HAS A HUGE OAK. ROOTS GROWING INTO STREET.
SUGGESTED PUTTING A FLAG ON THE TREE SO WE KNOW NOT TO IMPACT
IT.
❑ WOULD LIKE HIS NEIGHBOR (5209 SCHAEFER RD) TO DIRECT HIS WATER TO
THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM IN THE STREET (NEW STORM SEWER) AND NOT
TO HIS PROPERTY.
Schaefer Road Improvements
Improvement No. A -216
SURVEY RESULTS
NO
STREET
Returned
Decorative Street Lights
TRAFFIC CALMING
COMMENTS
Survey
Yes
No
Style
Yes
No
Colonial
jAcorn
Traditional
5004
SCHAEFER RD
5008
SCHAEFER RD
X
X'
X"
'Don't want, but if to be, the one that gives the best light; "Speed
bump between 5004 and 5008 Schaefer Rd. The knoll makes these
five driveways somewhat blind and the traffic is sometimes fast.
There have been some very dose calls.
5011
SCHAEFER RD
X
X
X
We need some sort of traffic calming on Schaefer Rd, please
consider implementing.
5012
SCHAEFER RD
5016
SCHAEFER RD
5017
SCHAEFER RD
X
X
X
Schaefer is a raoetrackl
5021
SCHAEFER RD
X
X
2
3
1
X
Speeders going 40-50 mph going down the hill between 5021 and
5217 Schaefer Rd. This happens frequentlyll
5025
SCHAEFER RD
5113
SCHAEFER RD
5117
SCHAEFER RD
X
X
Cars do frequently exceed speed limit on this street - often by as
much as 20 mph, but I don't know how best to slow vehicles down.
5125
SCHAEFER RD
X
X
X
5152
SCHAEFER RD
5200
SCHAEFER RD
5201
SCHAEFER RD
X
X
X'
'That was done years ago on the comer of Knoll Dr and Schaefer. I
was a disaster and quickly removed by a good sense council I
believe.
5209
SCHAEFER RD
X
X
X
5217
SCHAEFER RD
X
X
X
5224
SCHAEFER RD
5224
SCHAEFER RD
.5225
SCHAEFER RD
X
X
X
Oppose entire pmject, see letter.
6300
WESTWOOD CT
X
X
3
1
2
X
RE: Rainwater drainage: It is my opinion that in the past a
resident(s) has taken advantage of the city to drain water from a
pond because of overflowing due to rain. It was dearly not an
instance of the water causing damage to the home. It is not our
obligation to pay for a problem caused by a personal choice in
landscaping and a desire for improved aesthetics. This is more
aggravating knowing that this resident also runs water into the pond
24 hours a day when the water level is too low.
6321
INTERLACHEN BLVD
6401
INTERLACHEN BLVD
Returned
Prefer Decorative Street Lights
Prefer Traffic
Calming Measures
Total Surveys
Surveys
as
No
Style
Yes
No
Sent
Colonial
Acom
Traditional
22
11
1
10
2.5
2
1.5
6
4
Yo of Returned Surveys
5096
996
91 4
5596
360A
Note: 'oustra a Rankin
from 1 to 3
- Only 2 retumed surveys
included rankings
r
Z)4-c . P7, ` Z.O a 4
,CJo.
4-51 c'110 o•, ai .S�;, ce._ �, _`",�
S .QKJ S H S� ZJ� cz k/La 52. Ca. S$`g.S SN'L�hS
MG- nee."
Q 5 S 5 S � W e. darn �2C.- l�_ ne&4
�- Il
D
afq.es 60 &A-
Off as.e
Saa
PRELIMINARY
ASSESSMENT ROLL
SCHAEFER ROAD IMPROVEMENT A -216
CITY OF EDINA
STREET
PID #
LEGAL
STREET
NO.
OWNER
ASSESSABLE LOTS
LOT
BLOCK
TOTAL
LOTS
ASSESSMENT COST
A
Interlachen Blvd
30 -117 -21- 41.0026
1
1
6321'
Boehland, Thomas & IOm
0.333333
$ 3,133.33
30-117 - 21.42.0018
4
1
6401
lAanenson, Vernon
0.333333
3133.33
•
Schaefer Rd
30- 117 -21 -41 -0027
2
1
5011
Schultz, Scott & Martha
1
$ 9,400.00
30- 117 -21 -4 "028
3
1
5017
Macneil Pabica
1
9400.00
30- 117 -21 -4 "004
pt 27
5021
Metzger, Franz
1
9,400.00
30- 117 - 21-41- 0030
26
5025
Drobny,Jefty
1
$ 9400.00
30- 117 -21.41 -0029
25
5113
Schulze Richard
1
9.400.00
30- 117 -21 -41 -0002
24
5117
Sanderson, Paul & Janet
1
$ 9,400.00
30- 117 -21 -41-0001
23
5125
Smith Kevin & Pamela
1
9,400.00
30- 117 -21-44 -0004
22
5201
Kyllo, John & Carole
115
9,400.00
30- 117 - 21-44-0055
1
1
5209
Emerson Thomas & Zonelda
1
9,400.00
30- 117 - 21-44-0059
5
1
5217
Glickman Edward
1
8400.00
30- 117 - 21-44-0001
19
5225
Dinwiddle, Harry & Barbara
1
$ 9,400.00
30- 117 -21-43 -0004
14
5224
Weiner Howard
1
9400.00
30- 117 -21 -43-0003
13
5224
lWelner, Howard
1
$ 9,400.00
30- 117 -21- 43-0063
2
1
5200
1 Thomas James & Dianne
1
9,400.00
30- 117 -21 -42-0036
1
1
5152
Schall David & Patricia
1
$ 9 400.00
30- 117 -21 -42-0022
1
1
5016
Young, Evelyn
1
$ 8,400.00
30- 117 -21 -42-0021
2
1
5012
Rich Jeffrey 8 Amy
1
9,400.00
30- 117 -21-42 -0020
1
1
5008
Nelson Jr Bernard & Joan
1
9,400.00
30 -117 -21-42 -0019
5
1
5004
Johnson Roger
1
9,400.001
Westwood Ct
30- 117 -21 -44-0024
1 11
1
6300
Larson, ClUeord & Lucy
0.333333
$ 3.'
20 $ 188
TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 188,000.00
AVERAGE COST PER LOT $ 9,400.00
A- 219 —ASS WO- Feasbft Pagel 1:45PN13/31=05
.
w91��1
o� e = FEASIBILITY STUDY — A217
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
`' ay CITY OF EDINA
• fY<T)Hn)M >V
STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
SCHAEFER CIRCLE
MARCH 31, 2005
LOCATION: The Schaefer Circle project includes the neighborhood east of Schaefer Road
(see Figure 1).
05 5704 5709 5706
5708
5708 5713 5710
Probed 5712
Boundary
5712 �� 5717 5716 5714
�e
6208 6204 5718
5716 6216 6212
: 6201
800 6209
6217 6213
Og
5804 NN lop
5810
809-
11
Figure 1. Project Area Map
Feasibility Study
Schaefer Circle Imp. No. A -217
March 31, 2005
INITIATION & ISSUES: The Schaefer Circle project was initiated partially by a resident request to
address drainage problems at the east end of the cul -de -sac. The
Engineering Department expanded this area and included the neighborhood
as outlined in Figure 1 as part of the City's planning process to update the
infrastructure within this neighborhood.
The following are existing features that present issues in determining the
feasibility of the project and are addressed in this report:
• Surface rainwater drainage issues
• No existing watermain in Schaefer Circle
• Residents experience "brown water" problems
• Poor condition of existing pavement
• Existing landscaping, mailboxes, driveways, etc.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: The roadway in this neighborhood was originally constructed in the early 1960's,
the sanitary sewer was installed in 1959 and the water services were installed in
1969 and 1977. The roadway width varies ranging from 26 -ft to 29 -ft with no
curb and gutter and no sidewalks. The pavement condition varies but is in
very poor condition overall (see Photo 1).
Photo 1. Existing Pavement Condition
Street grades within the neighborhood are relatively flat in the cul -de -sac with
a steeper sloping roadway on the west end. Typical features exist adjacent
to the roadway such as retaining walls, concrete driveways, landscaping,
shrubs, trees and mailboxes. There is some existing storm sewer in the area
with isolated surface drainage problems.
Currently, no watermain exists in Schaefer Circle. Multiple residents are
served from single water service lines and /or from the water main located in
Page 2 of 6
Feasibility Study
Schaefer Circle Imp. No. A -217
March 31, 2005
Vernon Avenue. Due to multiple residents using a single service that is not
looped, some residents experience "brown water' conditions. No sanitary
sewer blockages have been reported. Most of the private utilities in this
neighborhood are overhead and serve the residents from the back of the
properties with the exception of the gas lines, which are buried in the
roadway.
PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS: This project involves reconstructing the existing bituminous pavement,
installing new watermain, repairing sanitary sewer as needed, and replacing
the water services from the new watermain to the curb boxes (valves located
at the property lines).
A neighborhood informational meeting was held on November 15, 2005 to
gather data and answer questions the homeowners had relating to the
project. Approximately six residents attended this meeting.
A neighborhood survey was sent to learn the favorability of constructing
concrete curb and gutters and installing decorative street lights with this
project. Input from the survey and comments received throughout the
planning of this project have been included in this report as an attachment.
The results of the survey are shown in Table 1.
Note: * 3 surveys responded and ranked Traditional No. 1 - no others were ranked
Table 1. Survey Results
The following is a summary regarding the survey results including staff's
recommendations:
The majority of residents do not prefer new concrete curb and gutter —
Reasons to construct concrete curb and gutter in this neighborhood
include: concrete curb and gutter tends to be more cost effective over the
life of the street, reduces pavement failure, provides safety, controls
drainage, provides driveway and traffic control, prevents roadway edge
rutting, prevents boulevard damage, and aids cleaning and snow plowing.
Although staff recommends constructing concrete curb and gutter in this
neighborhood, it is feasible to partially improve the roadway without
including concrete curb and gutter with this project. (The cost estimate
and assessment amount included in the report do not include curb and
gutter costs.)
Page 3 of 6
Returned
Prefer Curb & Gutter
Prefer Decorative Street Lights
Total Surveys
Surveys
Yes
No
B -HEAD
S -MOUNT
Yes
No
Style
Sent
Colonial
Acorn
Traditional
8
8
1
7
1
1
2
6
of Returned Surveys
100%
12%
88%
25%
75%
Note: * 3 surveys responded and ranked Traditional No. 1 - no others were ranked
Table 1. Survey Results
The following is a summary regarding the survey results including staff's
recommendations:
The majority of residents do not prefer new concrete curb and gutter —
Reasons to construct concrete curb and gutter in this neighborhood
include: concrete curb and gutter tends to be more cost effective over the
life of the street, reduces pavement failure, provides safety, controls
drainage, provides driveway and traffic control, prevents roadway edge
rutting, prevents boulevard damage, and aids cleaning and snow plowing.
Although staff recommends constructing concrete curb and gutter in this
neighborhood, it is feasible to partially improve the roadway without
including concrete curb and gutter with this project. (The cost estimate
and assessment amount included in the report do not include curb and
gutter costs.)
Page 3 of 6
Feasibility Study
Schaefer Circle Imp. No. A -217
March 31, 2005
s
\� N
AW
a
RIGHT -OF -WAY
• The majority of residents do not prefer installing decorative street lighting
— Staff does not recommend including decorative street lighting with this
project since lighting is not supported by the property owners and a direct
benefit to each property for this improvement is difficult to substantiate.
The pavement throughout this neighborhood appears to be at the end of its
useful life while the costs to maintain and repair the roadways are steadily
increasing. Overlaying or seal coating the pavement in this neighborhood is
not feasible.
The proposed roadway width is 27 -ft, which closely matches the existing
width and helps minimize impacts to the surrounding topography and
landscaping features (see Figure 2). Trees will be protected and impacts to
the trees will be minimized.
/ q �` • �" 621 ��
I U
62176—
\ .lob�
1''
_r
Figure 2. Proposed Project Layout
,P
Staff is continuing to analyze the utility repairs /replacements and will include
the needed improvements with the final plans. Other utility activities may
include replacement of gas mains within the neighborhood, which is
determined and coordinated by the local gas utility company.
& EASEMENTS The right -of -way along Schaefer Road is 60 -ft wide (60 -ft radius in the cul -de-
sac). All proposed roadway improvements stay within this right -of -way.
However, existing City utilities located in Schaefer Circle connect across the
properties in the southeast corner of the cul -de -sac to utilities located in
Vernon Avenue. No record of an existing easement for these utilities has
Page 4 of 6
;.. Feasibility Study
Schaefer Circle Imp. No. A -217
March 31, 2005
been discovered to date. It is anticipated that a permanent drainage and
utility easement will be required from the adjacent property owners to install
the new watermain in Schaefer Circle and loop it between the existing
watermain located in Schaefer Road and Vernon Avenue. The necessary
easements will be obtained as required.
FEASIBILITY: This project is feasible from an engineering and City standpoint.
PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $68,000. The total cost includes indirect
costs of 15% for engineering and clerical costs and 7.5% for first year finance
costs. The estimated construction cost does not include storm sewer,
watermain or utility improvements. New watermain is anticipated to be
installed in this neighborhood; however, the final utility improvements will be
determined during the final design and will be funded through the respective
utility fund. Funding for the entire project will be from a combination of
special assessment and utility funds.
ASSESSMENTS: A special assessment of approximately $8,500 per residential equivalent
unit or assessable lot will be levied against residents adjacent to the
neighborhood's roadways (see Figure 3). The justification for assessments is
attributed to properties receiving benefit of the new pavement. The
assessable lot is based on a detached single family home. A 10 -year
payback period for these special assessments is proposed for this project.
PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule is feasible from an Engineering standpoint:
ATTACHMENTS:
Council Orders Public Hearing .......... ..........................March 15, 2005
Receive Feasibility Report ............... ............................... April 5, 2005
Public Hearing .. ............................... ..........................April 19, 2005
Bid Opening ........ ............................... ............................May 2005
Award Contract .......................... ............................... Summer 2005
Begin Construction ..................... ............................... Summer 2005
Complete Construction ... ............................... Fall 2005 /Summer 2006
Note: The schedule is dependent on obtaining an . easement for the
watermain.
• Information Meeting Attendance List and Comments
• Survey Results and Comments
• Preliminary Assessment Roll
Page 5 of 6
Feasibility Study
Schaefer Circle Imp. No. A -217
March 31, 2005
%J I v-r
705 5704 5709 5706
5708
5708 5713 5710
Project 5712
Boundary
5714
5712 �� 5717 ...� ........ ......................•••.•5716
�� "'�••• ...•• 6208 6204 s'•, «�••• 5718
6216 6212
5716 '••.•�
ti
6201 •,.••`
SCHPEfEiI CIR •••••••••••�
•
1800 6209
6217 ••°
6213 ,.••'�
5804 N. •'
P,
5810
Figure 3. Preliminary Assessment Map
Ltf:]
Page 6 of 6
SIGN IN SHEET - INARMATION MEETING
Schaefer Circle
November 15, 2004
(Please print legibly - Thank you!)
Name(s)
Address
2.
3.
J �. CTS
,�-
4•
�,�, GU
b 21 it Cry
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
120.
Phv"a Cuft irligloy
QUESTION / COMMENT CARD
gene L .
onLerNA mof 1U w('+h d,.rcdl�n
Also lcestivm ed tlo ,mod r ,`A slk/l,4 g necv
Name M`� as Address (02ol sch.aa' (- Clrc ��-
PLEASE PR NT PLEASE PRINT
QUESTION / COMMENT CARD
r
Namur
8
3 r
Address l 2-,* 4 50— A aeqe r 0,1'r cje
PLEASE PRIN
PLEASE PRINT
SCHAEFEk. —aRCLE
IMPROVEMENT NO. A -217
SURVEY RESULTS
NO
STREET
Returned
Preferred Curb & Gutter
Decorative Street Lights
COMMENTS
Survey
Yes
No
B -HEAD
S -MOUNT
Yes
No
Style
Colonial
Acom
Traditional
6201
SCHAEFER CIR
X
X
X
6204
SCHAEFER CIR
X
X
X
6208
SCHAEFER CIR
X
X
X
X
1
We are very interested in burying the power
lines.
6209
SCHAEFER CIR
X
X
X
X
1
We are in favor of a new street - perhaps
C&G, but not upgrade every one elses
waterline. We would not benefit from it. We
hooked up to city water directly from Vernon
and no one on our street helped pay for it.
6212
SCHAEFER CIR
X
X
X
I would prefer that this project not take place
at all. Resurfacing the road would be fine,
but I am totally against the water and utility
improvement part of the project.
6213
SCHAEFER CIR
X
X
X
Letter attached.
6216
SCHAEFER CIR
X
X
X
1
I am on a comer lot and would probably have
to pay once for Schaefer Cir and then again
for Schaefer Rd construction. The darkness
is most upsetting. It is dangerous and a
security risk. Thank you.
6217
SCHAEFER CIR
X
X
I
X
Total Surveys
Returned
Prefer Curb & Gutter
Prefer Decorative
Street Lights
Survey
Yes
No
B -HEAD
S-MOUNT
Yes
No
Style•
Sent
Colonial
Acorn
Traditional
8
8
1
7
1
1
2
6
0
0
1
% of Returned Surveys
100%
112.50%
87.50%
25%
75%
Note:' 3 surveys responded and ranked Traditional
No. 1 - no others
were ranked
- _!" -
Hasbargen
6213 Schaefer Circle
Edina, MN 55436
952 - 932 -0877
Mr. Steven L. Lillehaug
Edina Traffic Engineer /Assistant Engineer
City Hall
4801 west 50*" Street
Edina, MN 55424
rte: Improvement No. A -217
Schaefer circle
Dear Mr. Lillehaug:
This is in reference to the above mentioned road
improvement on Schaefer circle. For the record, we are
against the improvements mentioned in your letter, dated
December 9, 2004. For a'road, which has limited traffic,
the amount mentioned for this project seems outlandish. we
are also hard pressed to understand why resurfacing the
road is not covered by our taxes. we are also not in favor
of the curb and gutter improvement and the streetlight. it
seems to us, these two improvements are out of character
with the surrounding neighborhood.
we have no rainwater drainage issues. Further, we are
unaware of any thing that has changed drainage in the
neighborhood. if the issue of drainage is arising because
there are issues with those who live at the end of the cul-
de -sac, these issues do not impact the rest of the circle
and should be addressed as so. The geography of our
neighborhood hasn't changed at all. This is not an issue.
Thank you for taking the time to read our comments. we
appreciate keeping us up to date on these issues and will
wait to hear from you in the near future.
J
very truly yours,
Donald and Terese Hasbargen
PRELIMINARY
ASSESSMENT ROLL
SCHAEFER CIRCLE IMPROVEMENT S -217
CITY OF EDINA
STREET
PID #
LEGAL
STREET
NO.
OWNER
LOT
BLOCK
LOTS
ASSESSMENT COST
A
Schaefer Cir
31- 117 -21- 14-0020
6
1
6216
Walsh, James, Helen, & Mary
1
$ 8,500.00
31- 117 -21- 14-0070
76 ptS
1
6212
Gaarder, Timothy
1
$ 8,500.00
31- 117 -21- 14-0023
pto
1
6208
Gaasedelen. James & Claudia
1
$ 8,500.00
31- 117 -21- 14-0024
9
1
6204
Hardg, Paul & Mari
1
$ 8,500.00
31- 117 -21. 41-0023
13
1
6201
Lasky, Michael
1
$ 8,500.00
31- 117 - 21.41.0024
14
1
6209
Totall Gary & Helen
1
$ 8,500.00
31- 117 -2141 -0025
15
1
6213
Hasbar en, Donald & Terese
1
$ 0,600.00
31- 117 - 2141-0026
16
1
6217
Juno, Klaus & Jody
11
8,500.00
8 $ 88.000.00
TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 68.000.00
AVERAGE COST PER LOT $ 8,500.00
A217 Assessments-FeasEY'ry Page 1 1:47 PM=12005
1:4
ok e r FEASIBILITY STUDY - BA328
Nail �o ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
•,ti�ry��KC. CITY OF EDINA
STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
WEST 58TH STREET
APRIL 1, 2005
LOCATION: The West 58 l Street project extends from Concord Avenue to Wooddale
Avenue (see Figure 1).
Doll
)16
rn
N
N in
O O O
(M CD U-) r` �''� 4DU1
N N N N �-
(D 'JI LO
4601
`r
v v a 't
v
LO v v
Lo v v
5615
5640
18
5633
5619
It o
(0
N
cc) v
5704
4620 4616 4608 4604 4600
N 4516 4512
5623
Ir
4524 v 5656
4629
(D 'JI LO
4601
5701 4505
5700
a v
m°
Nt It
5700
5705
It o
(0
N
cc) v
5704
5705
5704
4630
v (0
v (0
4600
5708
5712
5709
5708
CONCORDTER
5713
5710
—5713
5712
5713
ty
c2
o
0 4601
Project
5717
5'_ boundary
717
5716
5717
5721
5724
5721
5720
5721
O
v
CO
v
N
v
CO
(0
d
(0
O
572--------------
28
5725
5754
■ ■■
.■.
W 58TH
ST
w 5801 5800
W 5801 5800
�w 5801 5800 ■W 5801 5800
a 5805
5804
a
5805
5804
a 5805
5804
a 5805
5804
0
5808
0
5809
5808
= 5809
5808
a 5809
5808
z 5809
5812
U
5813
5812
01 5813
5812
a 5813
00 5817
5816
a
5817
5816
5817
5816
LL 5817
5812
5821
5820
5821
5820
5821
5820
5821
5820
5825
5824
5824
5825
5824
5825
5829
5828
5825
5828
5829
5828
5829
5828
5833
5832
5833
5832
5833
5832
5833
5832
5837
5836
5837
5836
5837
5836
5837
5836
5840
5841
5840
5841
5840
5841
5840
5841
5844
5845
5844
5845
5844
5845
5844
5901 5900 5901 5900 5901 5900 5901 5900
5905 5904 5905 5904 5905 5904 5905 5904
Figure 1. Project Area Map
a
J
O
0
°o
3
�
N
v
v I
Feasibility Study
West 58th Street Imp. No. A -204
April 1, 2005
INITIATION & ISSUES: The West 58th Street project was initiated by the Engineering Department as
part of the Five -Year Capital Improvements Program, which is part of the
City's planning process to update the critical infrastructure within this
neighborhood as outlined in Figure 1.
The following are existing features that present issues in determining the
feasibility of the project and are addressed in this report:
• Surface rainwater drainage and storm sewer issues
• Sump pump discharging directly onto street
• Sanitary sewer and watermain deficiencies
• Poor condition of existing pavement
• Existing landscaping, driveways, etc.
• Existing overhead utility lines and poles
• Existing mature trees
• Existing lighting
EXISTING CONDITIONS: West 58`h Street is part of the City's designated Municipal State Aid Roadway
System (MSA). The street and utilities in this neighborhood were originally
constructed in the 1950's with a storm sewer improvement in 1979. The
roadway width in this neighborhood is approximately 30 -ft with intermittent
curb and gutter and no sidewalks. The pavement condition varies throughout
the neighborhood but is in very poor condition overall (see Photo 1).
Photo 1. Existing Pavement Condition
Page 2 of 7
„Feasibility Study
West 58th Street Imp. No. A -204
April 1, 2005
The speed limit on this roadway is 30 mph and currently no parking
restrictions are posted along West 58`h Street.
Street grades within the neighborhood vary slightly but are relatively flat and
level. There is some existing storm sewer in the area, but overall the surface
drainage is very poor. Other typical items exist adjacent to the roadway such
as concrete driveways, landscaping, shrubs, trees and fences.
Most of the private utilities in this neighborhood are overhead (with the
exception of the gas lines). Street lighting consists of standard "cobra head”
lights mounted on wood poles that are typically located at the intersections.
PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS: This West 58`h Street project involves the following improvements:
• Reconstructing the existing bituminous pavement.
• Constructing new concrete curb and gutter, driveway aprons,
and sidewalk.
• Retaining walls (lannon stone)
• Installing new decorative street lighting.
• Repairing /replacing the watermain where needed.
• Replacing fire hydrants.
• Repairing_ the sanitary sewer where needed.
• Updating and extending the storm sewer to accommodate the
new concrete curb and gutter.
• Installing drain tile where needed to allow the property owners
to connect their sump pump discharges directly into the storm
sewer system.
A neighborhood informational meeting was held on November 22, 2005 to
gather data and answer questions the homeowners had relating to the
project. Over 14 residents attended this meeting.
Additionally, a neighborhood survey was sent to learn the favorability of
widening the street to obtain the necessary roadway width (to allow on- street
parking versus restricting parking) and installing decorative street lights with
this project. Input from the survey and comments received throughout the
planning of this project have been included in this report as an attachment.
The results of the survey are shown in Table 1.
Total Surveys
Surveys
Prefers Decorative Street
Lighting
Prefers Street
Widening (Parking
Allowed
Sent
Returned
Yes
No
Style
Yes
No
Colonial
I Acorn
I Traditional
19
1 12
7
4
2.00
11.57
1 1.50
1 1
10
% of Returned Surveys
1 63%
58%
33%
1
1
1 8%
83%
Table 1. Survey Results
Page 3 of 7
Feasibility Study
West 58th Street Imp. No. A -204
April 1, 2005
The following is a summary regarding the survey results including staff's
recommendations:
• The majority of residents prefer installing decorative
street lighting — Staff recommends including
decorative street lighting with this project (see Figure
2).
Figure 2. Decorative Lighting —
Traditional (latern) Style
• The majority of residents do not prefer widening the street by 2 -ft to
accommodate on- street parking — Staff recommends constructing the
street to a 32 -ft width between Concord Avenue and St. Johns Avenue to
meet MSA standards, which accommodates one lane of parking. This will
allow on- street parking for those residents that directly front West 58th
Street.
The roadway will be constructed to MSA standards. The proposed roadway
widths range from 28 -ft with no parking and 32 -ft with parking allowed on one
side of the street (see Figure 4). Parking is proposed to be allowed only on
the north side of West 58th Street between Concord Avenue and St. Johns
Avenue. This area consists of the properties that front directly on West 58th
Street — All other properties front on the side streets where on- street parking
is available. Parking is proposed to be restricted in all other locations along
West 58 "' Street in the project area. The varying roadway widths
accommodate the neighborhood by minimizing impacts to the surrounding
topography. Trees will be protected and impacts to the trees will be
minimized.
Staff recommends installing a barrier style curb and gutter as it will work well
with the existing topography within this neighborhood (see Figure 3). A
barrier style curb provides the best control of water runoff and better defines
the roadway while providing protection to the sod and pavement edge from
snowplow damage in the winter months.
B618 C ❑NC CURB & GUTTERS
6' {� R1/2'
R 3' I
AT tS ' R 3' 6'
4' PE R f T 7 RASE j • r 7 1/2'
18' i 8' -
Figure 3. Typical Barrier /Bulkhead Curb and Gutter
Page 4 of 7
Feasibility Study
West 58`h Street Imp. No. A -204
April 1, 2005
6
F-7 11
a
0,
U rj
Z
O
U
2
14
,MR
RIGHT -OF -WAY
W 58TH ST
W 58TH ST
Figure 4. Proposed Project Layout
The pavement throughout this neighborhood appears to be at the end of its
useful life while the costs to maintain and repair the roadways are steadily
increasing. Overlaying or seal coating the pavement in this neighborhood is
not feasible.
Staff is continuing to analyze the utility repairs /replacements and will include
the needed improvements with the final plans. Other utility activities usually
include replacement of gas mains within the neighborhood, which is
determined and coordinated by the local gas utility company.
& EASEMENTS The right -of -way along West 58th Street is typically 60 feet wide. All proposed
improvements stay within this right -of -way and no additional easement
requirements are anticipated.
Page 5 of 7
Feasibility Study
West 58th Street Imp. No. A -204
April 1, 2005
FEASIBILITY: This project is feasible from an engineering and City standpoint.
PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $357,000 (this amount includes
$40,000 for decorative lighting). The total cost includes indirect costs of
15% for engineering and clerical costs and 7.5% for first year finance costs.
The estimated construction cost does not include utility improvements.
Sanitary sewer, storm sewer and watermain work is anticipated in this
neighborhood; however, the final utility improvements will be determined
during the final design and will be funded through. the respective utility fund.
Funding for the entire project will be from a combination of special
assessment and utility funds.
ASSESSMENTS: A special assessment of approximately $68 per assessable front foot is
proposed for this project and will be levied against the residents adjacent
to West 58th Street. This assessment will cover 20% of the roadway
reconstruction costs. The funding the City receives through the State Gas
Tax for maintenance and construction of roadways will fund the remaining
portion of this cost. The justification for assessments is attributed to
properties receiving benefit of the new pavement, concrete curb and gutter,
and the addition of decorative street lighting.
The assessable front foot is based on Hennepin County 1/8 Section maps
and includes property that abuts the West 581h Street right -of -way. Properties
that abut this right -of -way with their backyard or sideyard will be assessed at
1/3 of the assessable front footage rate. A 10 -year payback period for these
special assessments is proposed for this project. 'A tabulated preliminary
assessment roll is attached to this study and a summary of this assessment
roll is shown in Figure 5.
PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule is feasible from an Engineering standpoint:
ATTACHMENTS:
Council Orders Public Hearing .......... ..........................March 15, 2005
Receive Feasibility Report ............... ............................... April 5, 2005
Public Hearing .. ............................... ..........................April 19, 2005
BidOpening .................................... ............................... May 2005
Award Contract ..... ............................... ...........................June 2005
Begin Construction ............................... ...........................June 2005
Complete Construction ....................... .........................Summer 2006
• Information Meeting Attendance List and Comments
• Survey Results and Comments
• Preliminary Assessment Roll
Page 6 of 7
Feasibility Study
West 58th Street Imp. No. A -204
April 1, 2005
5611
`O
v (D
~ °-'
N "' 4501
316
N
(D
N o 0 o
cfl
N "
v v v
5615
`r
a v v v
in� v
5640
318
5633
5619
CD
4620 4616 4608 4604 4600
" 4516 4512 5656
5623
�t
4524 't
4629
`O
v (D
``'
v
rn 1p
(D 46015700
5701
4505
5700
5705
(0
5704
v o
c0
N
00 v
5705
5704
4630
v v
t
�
v v
4600
5708
5712
5709
5708
CONCORDTER
5713
5716
5713
5712
°0
5713
iv ~
'r
o
0 4601
N
v v
v
v
5717
5720
5717
5716
5717
N
-
O
O -
5721
5724
5721
5720
04
5721
-
(D (D
(D
It
(D
,
`0
5725
5728
` 5725
5754 J
N
v
W 58TH
ST
5801
5800
w
5801
5800
w 5801
1 5800
r
5801
5800
580
w
a 5805
5804
a'
5805
5804
'a 5805
5804
w
'a
5805
5804
w
¢
580
0
5808:
o
5809
5808
= 5809
5808
a
5809
5808
a
580
z 5809
5812'
0
5813
5812
° 5813
5812
a
5813
°0
581
° 5817
581
a
5817
5816
N 5817
5816
LL
5817
5812
0
581
5821
582
5821
5820
5821
5820
5821
5820
3
582
5825
5824
5824
5825
5824
5825
582
5829
582$
5825
5828
5829
5828
5829
5828
582
5833
5832
5833
5832
5833
5832
5833
5832
583
5837
5830
5837
5836
5837
5836
5837
5836
583
5840:,
5841
5840
5841
5840
5841
5840
584
5841
5844
5845
5844
5845
5844
5845
5844
584
5901 5900 5901 5900 5901 5900 5901 5900 590
5905 5904 5905 5904 5905 5904 590 ' 590
5909 5908 5909 5908 590 o _�. ° 590
5908 � •5.,°
5913 5912 5913 5913 5912 591 591
Figure 5. Preliminary Assessment Map
Page 7 of 7
v. •z2 2oc�
vL
yq Oilc nC1avt ce )
It S 8 S+ Ctr "c.ard -io WaL->J d a I-c )
AMC
GaRD. e. - W I _ram t_
o
S_ro CY z.--t SO
r
y
to;16L f. 1055 h Am ..
B- O P—w_ K I f G4--
Acid re s s
51a8 F-/,I Rz FAY o-iC, <-o ak
�7ZS'SvL JG �� s
rRLx Ave.
,,dot Ashcrocfhe.
y6o() 14J.
s
QUE TION / COMMENT CARD
a Q�orei w2 4/�u f%UadC a� w „��er� e.✓ S
a� a rea,
Name
Address �S
PLEASE RINT PLEASE PRINT
QUESTION / COMMENT CARD
lLL cm rn
V\
t of ` 'n tp Gab6ir� �0.�on
Name Cox 4n d r r Address 6-U-5 r•Aa
PLEASE PRIN PLEASE PRINT
�S,a q)a - lo(oa
.Steve Lillehaug
From: Wayne Houle
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 4:21 PM
To: Steve Lillehaug
Subject: FW: 58th Street Improvement Project
fyi
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Moira [ mailto :morninglory08ll29 @excite.comI
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 4:10 PM
To: Wayne Houle
Cc: joshua .olson@provationmedical.com
Subject: 58th Street Improvement Project
Hi Wayne,
Josh & I wish to express our desire NOT to have a "parking bay" located directly across
the street from our 5801 Ashcroft Ave. home. We feel that this will invite non - neighbors
to park across from us, and thus affect our sense of security. We will be more than happy
to try to assist our neighbors in sharing our driveway if they ask us for help at special
events, etc., when they may have driveway overflow.
We also feel that a parking bay would look extremely odd ... as few, if any, surrounding
streets have such a feature. We do not wish our home's curbside appeal to be negatively
impacted.
Please add this concern to your list of comments on this project.
Thank you.
Moira & Josh Olson
Join Excite! - http: / /www.excite.com
1
'Steve Lillehaug
From:
Wayne Houle
Sent:
Wednesday, November 24, 2004 8:31 AM
To:
'morninglory081129 @excite.com'
Cc:
Steve Lillehaug
Subject:
RE: 58th Street Improvement Project
Josh & Moira:
Thank you for your comments. Your comments and issues will be addressed and included in
the referenced project's feasibility study and presented to the Council for consideration.
Thanks
Wayne Houle, PE
Director of Public Works / City Engineer
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
whoule @ci.edina.mn.us
952- 826 -0443 direct
952 - 826 -0390 fax
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Moira [ mailto :morninglory08ll29 @excite.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 3:27 PM
To: Wayne Houle
Cc: joshua .olson@provationmedical.com
Subject: 58th Street Improvement Project
Hello Wayne,
Thanks again for the informative meeting last evening. Josh & I own 5801 Ashcroft-Ave.,
and we wanted to point out a serious concern to us, as sidewalk feasability /location is
one of the improvements on the table.
We have a one -car cement driveway. Last month, we had an asphalt pull -out spot added
alongside the east side of the driveway, bumping our total available parking spaces to 3
outside the garage. We spent $1000 in order to make this improvement from 2 to 3 spaces.
If a sidewalk is added, we'll be back down to 2 spaces (unless we change our cars to Geo
Metros) and won't have a long enough available space to add more. It would look
ridiculous to add another spot alongside the 2 existing spaces. As we have 1 14 -year old
and a preteen in the family, parking for us will really be at a premium soon.
We very much will appreciate you taking our situation into consideration as various
sidewalk pros and cons are discussed. Please feel free to contact Moira at 952 - 285 -296F
(home) or 952- 992 -5341 (work) to discuss the matter further.
Sincerely,
1
Moira and Joshua Olson
Join Excite! - http: / /www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
rage t of 1
Steve Lillehaug
From: Bob.Stoltz [Bob.Stoltz @target.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 2:17 PM
To: Steve Lillehaug
Cc: bobnewkirk@mn.rr.com
Subject: Comments for 58th St. Improvements
Hi Steve -
Thank you for the thorough presentation of the proposed road improvements for 58th St. - it was
very informative in helping us understand the scope and possible options to consider. I live at 4608
58th St. (one of the "blue" houses) - My comments somewhat reflect the fact that I am one of
seven houses that have addresses on 58th Street.
My comments /concerns are:
• Maintain the mature trees on the north side of 58th (between Concord and St. Johns - I don't
recall mature trees on the north side between St. Johns and Wooddale).
• Maintain "residential" feel of street - Ideally, reduce the width of the new road relative to the
existing road. I would not want the street to resemble Wooddale in terms of width. Wide feels
like fast.
• Add a sidewalk with a minimal boulevard - The idea being to have "green" between the road
and sidewalk so that the sidewalk does not feel like an extension of the road.
• No parking on either side of the road. I don't mean to represent my neighbors on this issue,
but very seldom does anyone park on the road currently. I think this was reflected in some of
the comments last night. My preference is to not make it more inviting to park along 58th
(which is what I believe parking "bays" would do).
I've attached a sketch that reflects the concerns mentioned above - If the road was reduced to 28
feet in width (from it's current 30 feet) and by shifting the the south edge of the road 2 feet to the
south, it would allow the north side to have a boulevard, sidewalk and 3' of existing "green" to the
base of the existing trees.
An option to consider - The section of road from St. Johns to Wooddale could have a wider
boulevard w /trees since there are not existing mature trees on the north side (nor do the houses
"front" 58th Street). The road would align the full length, but the sidewalk would "shift" at St.
Johns. Not sure if that's allowable or not.
Thanks again for your time - let me know if you have any questions or comments!
Bob (and Vivian) Stoltz
4608 58th Street West
(952) 929 - 3613
11/23/2004
�Ofro -ra
be 00
).0 1kO
��.j ���o�� wc►�� :�� y,� of �� �i�•
be PAO - �$ ,, p,► � CanGO�-lo
�NO ftaK►nO �o�tNy
�(P�IWK
_ raPtq
--011 foov*v
liti
! +10 ! r • J
m n
Steve Lillehaug
From: Steve Lillehaug
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 11:07 AM
To: 'Ryan Langsev'; Wayne Houle
Cc: Steve Lillehaug
Subject: RE: 58th Street West street project
Thank you for your comments. Your comments and issues will be addressed and included in
the referenced project's feasibility study and presented to the Council for consideration.
Thank you.
Steven L. Lillehaug, P.E., P.T.O.E.
Edina Traffic Engineer /Assistant Engineer
Engineering Department
952 - 826 -0445
slillehaug @ci.edina.mn.us
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
www.cityofedina.com
(fax) 952 - 826 -0389
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Ryan Langsev [ mailto :rlangsev @mulliganbjornnes.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 10:56 AM
To: Wayne Houle
Cc: Steve Lillehaug
Subject: 58th Street West street project
Mr. Houle:
Thank you for the informational meeting last evening. I and my family
reside at 5801 Concord Avenue. Although we have many concerns regarding
the street project as a homeowner, none is more greater than whether the
project will address a huge and vexing problem that continues to concern
property owners in the western part of this project: stormwater runoff.
Current stormwater pipes / utilities in this area do NOT properly
handle this significant water concern. Every time the City receives a
one -half inch or more of rainfall in a 24 hour period, ponding occurs in
the area adjacent to and along Concord Avenue and south of South View
middle school where the new high school baseball field is being built.
Ponding occurs every time. I am not aware of what steps were taken to
address this concern in the recent construction on the south side of the
southeast parking lot for the middle school campus. Nonetheless, I do
not see how the problem was resolved; if anything, it appears the
addition of two more drain outlets to this spot has significantly
compounded this problem.
Ponding becomes a temporary "lake" for a period of time corresponding
to the amount of rainfall: for one -half inch, about one day; greater
than one -half to an inch, one day of water, and another day when the
field is too soaked for human access; more than one inch,.days of
standing water, followed by a day or two when the field cannot handle
human traffic. It will be interesting to watch how the Edina High
School baseball team attempts to maintain its schedule and host games on
this field during a wet spring. As a parent, I would be concerned
-whether my child is put in jeopardy playing on a soggy field in an
attempt to get all the games played due to postponement from rain. The
Edina high school baseball team may begin playing its games and
practices on a field which has a reputation in the Twin Cities western
suburbs as being a mud field.
During the major storm of June 2003 when our area lost power for over
three days, the water runoff from the storm went over the sidewalk from
the school campus into Concord Avenue and over the eastside gutters onto
our property and other properties along the east side of Concord Avenue.
Clearly, the stormwater drains do NOT properly handle significant water
amounts or prevent such water from causing major structural damage to
many houses in the Concord Avenue / 58th Street West area.
If this street project is to address all issues for a fifty year
period, it MUST fully provide significant storm drainage capacity much
greater than its current ability to accomodate water runoff. Water
runoff appears to be increasing in volume to the area based upon past
history, recent construction, and reporting that our general weather
patterns are becoming warmer with more severe weather systems (i.e.
greater number of tornados and other systems characterized by torrential
rains) .
I understand the area water problem may be compounded fundamentally by
being located at the end of the water drain system whereby its immediate
runoff is partly back -up from and /or a result of all immediate eastern
properties runoff which must drain away before the water in this area
can finally drain away. It is for these reasons and others that I was
puzzled how the City determined it could place its preminent baseball
field in this location.
My concerns are not meant to address the incredible water problems
caused by the 1987 storm. You are well aware as to how high the water
levels reached in our area.
Nonetheless, I submit that the City will exercise poor business
judgment and implement bad decisions of its discretionary capacity in
its governmental role if it does not properly address the water runoff
in this area in implementation of this street project. The City is
certainly'on notice that water runoff in this area is a significant
problem. The City Council certainly should not only be fully advised of
this problem, but also advised that the project WILL address the issue,
and demonstrate to the Council the project's ability to properly correct
the significant problem and accommodate the water runoff.
I trust you, Steven L. Lillehaug, and your department will address this
significant problem in the context of the proposed 58th Street project.
Ryan E. Langev
5801 Concord Avenue
Edina, MN 55424
(952) 925 -9141
Ryan E. Langeev
Mulligan & Bjornnes PLLP
401 Groveland Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55403
(612) 879 -1819
2
Steve Lillehaug
From: Gary Williams [gary@SayltsSold.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 9:39 AM
To: Steve Lillehaug
Subject: FW: November 22, Informational Meeting Edina City Hall
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Gary Williams [mailto:gary@SayItsSold.com]
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 10:26 PM
To: 'slillehaug ®edina.mn.us'
Subject: November 22, Informational Meeting Edina City Hall
Hi Steve
Thank you first of all for the very informative meeting tonight. My name is
Gerard E. Williams, and I live at 5728 Fairfax Ave. So Edina. I would very
much like you to accept my vote to do the reconstruction of 58th street. I
would like to see the road decreased to 28 feet wide. I am not in favor of
having parking spaces adjacent to my home, as it would not give me much side
yard. I would like to see it adjacent to the homes further west as you have
it planned, I think it would not only look good but also slow down the
speed. I would vote for side walks , even though I believe they would be on
my side of the street. Unlike some of the other's I would like to see the
extra monies spent to add the nice street lighting, as I think it would add
value to the neighborhood. If you have any further comments needed from me I
would be happy to share them. I make my living selling Real Estate, and I do
know what will help increase the value of homes. If my home faced 58th like
the one's west of me I would not hesitate to have parking in front of my
home, as it will help future sales value for resale. I would be glad to
speak to that fact if you need it.
Thank You
Gerard E. Williams
WEST 58TH STF MPROVEMENT
IMPROVEME,.. NO. BA -328
SURVEY RESULTS
Returned
Decorative
Street Lights
Widening Street
Survey
Yes
No
Style
Yes No
NO
STREET
Colonial
Acorn
Traditional
COMMENTS
Please se my email of 12/17 for additional comments; if decorative
street lights are installed, I think lightpoles should be black, not green.
4600158TH
ST W
X
X
2
3
1
X
Thanks.
Leave street as is. Add "no parking" signs on one side. Do not destroy
8 blvd treets on no.side. No sidewalk - widen street 2 ft. - parking one
4604
58TH ST W
X
1
X
side.
No to parking. Must retain mature trees. Please go forward with
proposed 28 ft. road. 32 ft. section gives impression that road is wider
(ala Wooddale) - narrow road with no parking should be only
4608158TH
ST W
X
X
2
1
3
X
consideration. Thank you.
4612
58TH ST W
4616
58TH ST W
4620
58TH ST W
Such proposed parking is not seen anywhere else in Edina. Its
presence would only serve to cheapen the value of our n'hood and
promote strangers to park their vehicles on our street. It also eats into
the yards and driveways of residents. Having a sidewalk, especially a
buffered one is damaging enough as it is. Why is that not a question on
the survey? It's known issue (you mention it yourself in this mailing)
The choise of whether or not to have a buffer has already been taken
out of our hands. I don't appreciate the felling that the entire issue of a
sidewalk has been as well. It seems as though you might be more
concerned with the city than the citizens, on that issue. I look forward to
5801
ASHCROFT AVE
X
X
1
X
hearing more about the status of a sidewalk.
5800
ASHCROFT AVE
I am not in favor of a new sidewalk on the northside of the street. My
5721
CONCORD AVE
X
X
1
X
concern is the trees that could be endangered with a sidewalk.
Parking along 58th St. has always been a problem involving traffic flow
issues, especially during high volume use activities such as football
games. However, I recognize that great deference should be afforded
the homeowners on the no.side of 58th between Concord and St.
5801
CONCORD AVE
X
X
1
X
johns. Aves.
I would like to see the road from Wooddale to St. Johns reduced by 2'
to then be 28' wide. You can then widen from St. Johns to concord to
allow for parking. I just don't want from Wooddale to St. Johns
5728
FAIRFAX AVE
X
X
2
3
1
X
widened.
5800
FAIRFAX AVE
WEST 58TH STREET IMPROVEMENT
IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-328
SURVEY RESULTS
NO
STREET
Returned
Survey
Decorative
Street Lights
Widening Street
COMMENTS
Yes
No
Style
Yes No
Colonial jAcom
Colonial
Traditional
I Traditional
57251
FAIRFAX AVE
X
X
7
1 1
2.00
2
1.50
X
10
58011
FAIRFAX AVE
X
33%
X
1
8%
83%
X
No sidewalks.
57251ST
JOHNS AVE
5801
IST JOHNS AVE
X
X
3
1
2
*
*
*Abstain - I am not impacted by the decsion directly. I am for whatever
has the least impact to existing trees considering also the proposed
sidewalk.
58001ST
JOHNS AVE
X
X
1
X
Want narrow street.
5754
WOODDALE AVE
5800
WOODDALE AVE
X
X
1
X
I am a senior citizen and wonder why or if widening the street is for
parking for the new gyms and not residents. I have never noticed the
street lights north of 50th on Wooddale, but now that I have, they are
dim and look dirty.
Totals
19
12
7
4
10
11
12
1
10
2.00
1.57
1.50
Total Surveys
Surveys
Decorative Street Lighting
Preference
Street Widening
Preference
(Parking Allowed
Sent
Returned
Yes
No
Style
Yes
No
Colonial
Acorn
I Traditional
19
12
7
4
2.00
1.571
1.50
1
10
% of Returned Surveys
1 63%158%
33%
1
8%
83%
Page 1 of 2
Steve Lillehaug
From: Bob Newkirk [bobnewkirk@mn.rr.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2004 1:16 AM
To: Steve Lillehaug
Cc: Bob.Stoltz
Subject: More Comments for 58th St. Improvements
Steve,
Just wanted to let you know that Kristine and I (at 4600 W. 58th St.) support the views outlined in Bob Stoltes
note below, as well as the specific plan he attached. I think the major concerns of the residents are:
Keep Speeds Down. In this case, that means a narrower road. Parking availability doesn't slow traffic down,
because so little parking takes place on this road.
Maintain Aesthetics. This means keeping the mature trees, and adding a "boulevard" sidewalk, i.e., one that isn't
flush up against the street. 1 would also observe that there is a power line that crosses the street between just
west of Woodale that could be buried.
Improve Drainage. This all takes place underground, I assume, but the area in general gets a lot of runoff during
storms and this issue must be kept front of mind.
I do think a sidewalk is in order for the children in the area. We would also be open to nicer street lamps, pending
the additional assessment analysis.
With respect to parking, I would note that this would only appear to be a practical issue for the residents that have
driveways on 58th street. The number of nearby side streets and the double -width driveways on this street
mitigate the relatively minor need for parking. I also don't see how there is room to save the mature trees, have a
boulevard sidewalk and have parking. One of the three has to go. It's easy for me to say, as our driveway opens
on St. John's, but I would choose to eliminate the parking.
Thanks again for a good presentation last month. I'm sure the ultimate end product will turn out well.
Bob Newkirk
4600 W. 58th St.
952.924.6023
- - -- Original Message ---
From: Bob.Stoltz
To: slillehaugaci.edina.mn.us
Cc: bobnewkirk(amn.rr.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 12:16 PM
Subject: Comments for 58th St. Improvements
Hi Steve -
Thank you for the thorough presentation of the proposed road improvements for 58th St. - it was
very informative in helping us understand the scope and possible options to consider. I live at
4608 58th St. (one of the "blue" houses) - My comments somewhat reflect the fact that I am one
of seven houses that have addresses on 58th Street.
My comments /concerns are:
12/22/2004
Page 2 of 2
• Maintain the mature trees on the north side of 58th (between Concord and St. Johns - I
don't recall mature trees on the north side between St. Johns and Wooddale).
• Maintain "residential" feel of street - Ideally, reduce the width of the new road relative to
the existing road. I would not want the street to resemble Wooddale in terms of width.
Wide feels like fast.
• Add a sidewalk with a minimal boulevard - The idea being to have "green" between the road
and sidewalk so that the sidewalk does not feel like an extension of the road.
• No parking on either side of the road. I don't mean to represent my neighbors on this issue,
but very seldom does anyone park on the road currently. I think this was reflected in some
of the comments last night. My preference is to not make it more inviting to park along
58th (which is what I believe parking "bays" would do).
I've attached a sketch that reflects the concerns mentioned above - If the road was reduced to 28
feet in width (from it's current 30 feet) and by shifting the the south edge of the road 2 feet to
the south, it would allow the north side to have a boulevard, sidewalk and 3' of existing "green"
to the base of the existing trees.
An option to consider - The section of road from St. Johns to Wooddale could have a wider
boulevard w /trees since there are not existing mature trees on the north side (nor do the houses
"front" 58th Street). The road would align the full length, but the sidewalk would "shift" at St.
Johns. Not sure if that's allowable or not.
Thanks again for your time - let me know if you have any questions or comments!
Bob (and Vivian) Stoltz
4608 58th Street West
(952) 929 - 3613
12/22/2004
PRELIMINARY
ASSESSMENT ROLL
W 58th St IMPROVEMENT BA -328
CITY OF EDINA
STREET
PID8
LEGAL
STREET
NO.
OWNER
Frontage
LOT
BLOCK
Front Fmtg
Side Fmtg
Back Fmtg
Tofe
Assessable
Frontage
ASSESSMENT COST
A
Ashcroft Ave
184M&24-31-0060
24
7
Sa01
Bedme, Wirt
135.821
452087
S 3,069.96
19-028-26-31-0098
1
8
6600
Smx, Dorthv
136.9200
46.2057
S 3,0B9.96
Concord Ave
19-028-24-240022
4
1
5721
Bernard, Jaoquallne
116711
38.571
S 2,619.25
1892 8-24-31 -0000
24 8 p123
a
6901
Lanpw, Ryan & Leslie
135.821
1
45.2057
S 3,19.96
Fairfax Ave
19-02 &24.29 -128
4
2
6728
Williams. Gerard
131171
43.7587
S 2.971.47
1902 8-24 - 24-0037
6
3
6725
Ford Gerald It Mderd
128.610
43,2000
S 2.9U67
19-02 8-24-31 -121
24
5
6801
Tremel Joseph
134.121
44.7087
3 3035.99
19-02 8-24-31 -122
1
8
68M
Wendt. SteWwnle
136021
45.217
5 31996
19-02 &24240028
5
2
6725
H en, 8 Mellsae
131.2700
43.7587
s 2 871.47
18-02 &24-31 -OD65
0
0
6801
W 6 & EI Amanda
136.821
462007
3 009.96
19-02 &24. 31-0068
1
7
6800
Bar At- & Michele
1366200
46.2057
3 069.94
fflJohns
19-028-24-24M21
12
1
4620
Hndly. Gayle
80.0000
1.MM
S 5,432.72
19920-2424.120
11
1
4618
Evaen &Patricia
80.0000
80.0000
6432.72
1992&2424 -0018
10
1
4612
Miar, Jarnvana 8 Gonputana. Ye*d
80.010
1.M00
6432.72
194)2&24249018
B
1
4608
1 Skit; Robed 8 VM-
80.0000
80.0000
I S 6.432.72
1902 8-2424 -0017
1 a
1
4606
E Rl had & Jeenniro
80.0000
6 :11(
5,43272
1942&24240018
1 7
1
4800
Robed & KA tine
78.2700
762700
6,315.24
Wooddakf Ave
1992&2424-0038
4
3
5754
Wind, Jerome
129.BOM
43.2000
$ 2,833.67
1902&24-31-0001
1
6
5800
Kormann, Robert 8 Eliz"h
134.1200
44.717
S 3,035.98
1.051.4057
S 71,400.00
7"
Medway PROJECT COST S 317,000.00
demrathre ligtding cost s 40.000.00
total roadwayA ghUrg cod S 357,000.00
Total Assessable Cod (20% assessed! 80% SA) 8 71,41.1
TOTAL ASSESSABLE FTG: 1,051.407
ASSESSABLE COST PER FOOT: S 97.91
W 5111, at 1 ft-IIb_Yeileb Pape 1 2:ee PrN31rJn05
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Steven Lillehaug, PE, PTOE
Assistant Engineer
Date: April 5, 2005
Subject: Set Public Hearing Dates
for:
• Bridge Lane & Townes
Road Roadway
Improvement No. BA -312
• Shannon Drive Roadway
Improvement No. BA -329
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # IV. J.
Consent .
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
® To Council
Action ® Motion
® Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
ff
Approve resolution calling for Public Hearings on May 3, 2005 for roadway
improvements to the following:
• Bridge Lane and Townes Road (Improvement No. BA -312) consisting of Bridge
Lane west of Townes Road and Townes Road between West 48th Street and
Bridge Lane.
• Shannon Drive (Improvement No. BA -329) consisting of Shannon Drive between
Dewey Hill Road and Kemrich Drive.
Info /Background:
City staff is requesting these street improvements based on the condition of the streets
and the necessary utility improvements„ required throughout the neighborhoods. Staff
has reviewed these "projects and has determined they are feasible. Feasibility studies
will be completed and submitted prior to the Public Hearing. Staff suggests scheduling
a Public Hearing on May 3, 2005.
G: \Engineering \Improvements \BA312 Bridge Lane and Townes Road\ CORRESPONDENCE \Miscellanious \BA312 -BA329
RR_request for public hearing.doc
CITY OF EDINA
3/16/2005 13:15:28
R55CKREG
LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 1
3/17/2005
-3/1712005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
270018
3117/2006
100608 3M CO HGF0878
1,413.89
SIGN LETTERING
107799
SS34036
1325.6531
SIGNS & POSTS
STREET NAME SIGNS
1,413.89
270019
311712005
100613 AAA
1,610.12
NEW PLATES FOR CARS
107619
031005
1553.6260
LICENSES & PERMITS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1,610.12
270020
3/1712005
102971 ACE ICE COMPANY
41.92
107751
452450
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
41.92
270021
3117/2006
102128 AEARO CO.
109.00
SAFETY GLASSES
107467
04173491
1301.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
109.00
270022
311712006
105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY
125.00
COFFEE
107713
123613
1628.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SENIOR CITIZENS
125.00
270023
311712006
103357 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO
85.00
CAMERA REPAIR SHIPPING
107801
SVCINVO4433
2210.6235
POSTAGE
COMMUNICATIONS
85.00
270024
311712005
101115 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER
89.99
107590
59056 -2/05
1470.6201
LAUNDRY
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
427.06
107591
6200 -2/05
1470.6201
LAUNDRY
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
42.28
107592
35334 -2/05
5821.6201
LAUNDRY
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
106.13
107593
35320 -2/05
5841.6201
LAUNDRY
YORK OCCUPANCY
189.45
107594
35314 -2/05
5861.6201
LAUNDRY
VERNON OCCUPANCY
528.29
107595
46 -2/05
1551.6201
LAUNDRY
CITY HALL GENERAL
81.20
107715
3695 -2105
5210.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
49.12
107716
16813 -2/05
5421.6201
LAUNDRY
GRILL
1,513.52
270026
3/17/2005
100630 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC.
176.34
COPIER PAPER
107620
157758701
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
176.34
270026
311712005
102171 ANDERSON -JOHNSON ASSOCIATES
13,240.50
ARCHITECT /ENG SERVICES
107468
050540205
47036.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
RENOVATE BRAEMAR PARK FIELD
13,240.50
CITY OF EDINA
3/16/2005 13:15:28
R55CKREG
LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 2
3117/2005
- 3/17/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No -
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
270027
3/17/2006
116465 ANDERSON, TOM
- --
39.98
-
UNIFORM PURCHASE
107582
030705
5840.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
39.98
270028
3/17/2005
100595 ANOKA COUNTY
250.00
OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT
107469
030705
1000.2055
DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS
GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
250.00
270029,
3/17/2005
104235 APPLIED MEDIA
100.00
PERFORMANCE 3/24/05
107714
030105
5610.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
ED ADMINISTRATION
100.00
270030
3/17/2005
101977 ARCH WIRELESS
10.96
PAGER
107470
A6096083C
1551.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CITY HALL GENERAL
10.96
270031
3/1712006
105342 ARNOLD, MATTHEW
91.93
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
107596
030805
1622.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
SKATING & HOCKEY
91.93
270032
3/17/2005
117874 ARTS & CUSTOM PUBLISHING CO. I
295.00
AD
107800
00015753
5210.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
295.00
270033
3/17/2005
106471 BACH, KAY
53.00
TRIP REFUND
107717.
031005
1628.4392.07
SENIOR TRIPS
SENIOR CITIZENS
53.00
270034
3/17/2005
105016 BARBEAU MARKETING GROUP_ INC.
-
4,291.05
ABOUT TOWN AD COMMISSION
107597
2005 -1
2210.6123
MAGAZINE /NEWSLETTER EXPENSE
COMMUNICATIONS
208.90
ABOUT TOWN AD COMMISSION
107598
2005 -2
2210.6123
MAGAZINE /NEWSLETTER EXPENSE
COMMUNICATIONS
4,499.95
270035
3117/2005
100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO.
965.50
NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING
107825
2327354 -131
04287.1705.20
CONSULTING DESIGN
STORM SEWER CONCORD & SCHOOL
965.50
270036
3117/2005
102196 BATTERIES PLUS
10.60
BATTERIES
107471
18- 112908
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
60.67
BATTERIES
107599
18- 113180
5915.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
WATER TREATMENT
95.29
BATTERIES, CHARGER
107600
18- 113120
6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
WATER TREATMENT
3/16/2005 13:15:28
Page- 3
Business Unit
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
125 00 PERFORMANCE 3/31/05 107718 030105 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION
125.00
270039 311712005 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION
285.70
107551
32568700
R55CKREG LOG20000
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
CITY OF EDINA
107552
32568800
Council Check Register
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
36.84
3/17/2005 -3/17/2005
Check # Date
- _ - - - -- - - -- -
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
YORK SELLING
166.56
107554
270037 311712005
5842.5515
102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC.
YORK SELLING
1,834.90
103.13
BATTERIES
107472 23061 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS
5842.5513
103.13
YORK SELLING
69.00
270038 3/17/2005
107556
101245 BELL, BRUCE
5842.6406
3/16/2005 13:15:28
Page- 3
Business Unit
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
125 00 PERFORMANCE 3/31/05 107718 030105 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION
125.00
270039 311712005 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION
285.70
107551
32568700
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
37.95
107552
32568800
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
36.84
107553
39664300
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
18.99
107554
39658800
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
1,834.90
107555
32568900
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
69.00
107556
39658900
5842.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
YORK SELLING
24.77
107557
39659400
5860.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
173.69
107558
39659200
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
312.80
107666
32569300
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
2,794.64
270040 3117/2005
101191 BENNEROTTE, JENNIFER
8.05
EXPENSES REIMBURSEMENT
107601
030805
2210.6408
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
COMMUNICATIONS
79.00
EXPENSES REIMBURSEMENT
107601
030805
2210.6124
WEB DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNICATIONS
87.05
270041 3/17/2005
117859 BERGMAN, LURINE
29.58
UNIFORM PURCHASE
107581
030705
5840.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
29.58
270042 3/1712005
100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS
157.98
OFFICE SUPPLIES
107602
3723100
1140.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PLANNING
132.90
OFFICE SUPPLIES
107603
3710900
5510.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
ARENA ADMINISTRATION
167.67
OFFICE SUPPLIES
107604
3572770
5510.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
ARENA ADMINISTRATION
130.61-
CREDIT
107605
CM3572770
5510.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
ARENA ADMINISTRATION
37.05-
CREDIT
107606
CM3572770 -1
5510.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
ARENA ADMINISTRATION
18.66
PENS, CORRECTION TAPE
107621
3725560
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
8.59
CD CASES
107622
3716670
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
15.39
TASK FORCE MATERIALS
107623
3737290
1508.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
RPC
119.87-
RETURN
107624
CM3673360
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
33.52
OFFICE SUPPLIES
107719
3732750
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
3/17/2005 — 3/17/2005
Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
50.18 OFFICE SUPPLIES 107720 3739300 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
64.41- OFFICE SUPPLIES 107721 CM3629210 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS
3116/2005 13:15:28
Page- 4
Business Unit
ADMINISTRATION
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
47036.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT RENOVATE BRAEMAR PARK FIELD
5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES
5860.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
232.95
5511.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
270043
3/17/2005
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
116335 BLOOMINGTON CHRYSLER JEEP
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
95.25
MIRROR
107473
417223
95.25
270044
3/17/2005
100664 BRAUN INTERTEC
1.980.00
SOIL TESTING SERVICES
107474
242438
1,980.00
270045
3/17/2005
117695 BRUENING, CHARLOTTE
29.95
--
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
107475
030305
29.95
270046
3/1712005
117861 BRUNN, MARY
50.00
UNIFORM PURCHASE
107584
030705
50.00
270047
311712005
117867 BUDGET BLINDS
--
1,801.98
VERTICAL BLINDS
107607
PO 8080
1,801.98
270.048
311712006
100681 CATCO
184.16
BRAKE PARTS
107476
3 -69581
204.29
SHOES, SEALS
107625
3 -69897
388.45
270049
311712005
103711 CENTERPOINT ENERGY GAS SERVICE
41.29
107802
1090012
8.103.12
107803
1090002
6,058.20
107804
1089402
14,202.61
270050
3/17/2005
104260 CERTIFIED INTERNATIONAL CORP.
43179
MERCHANDISE
107722
595986
433.79
270051
3/17/2005
100243 CHECKCARE SYSTEMS
1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS
3116/2005 13:15:28
Page- 4
Business Unit
ADMINISTRATION
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
47036.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT RENOVATE BRAEMAR PARK FIELD
5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES
5860.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
5511.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
5311.6186
HEAT
POOL OPERATION
1552.6186
HEAT
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
5620.6186
HEAT
EDINBOROUGH PARK
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
477.00 CHECK READER 107477 05030174 -032 5822.6406
177.00 CHECK READER 107477 05030174 -032 1.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING
GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING
r +
CITY OF EDINA
3/16/2005 13:15:28
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 5
3/17/2005
- 3/17/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
477.00
CHECK READER
107477
05030174 -032
5862.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
VERNON SELLING
1,431.00
270052
3/1712006
116363 CHIPPEWA GRAPHICS INC.
310.99
ENVELOPES
107805
6906
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
310.99
270053
311712005
105690 COASTAL TRAINING TECHNOLOGIES
432.12
TRAINING VIDEO
107626
030105
1470.6579
TRAINING AIDS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
432.12
270054
3/17/2005
103171 CORPORATE ADVERTISING & INCENT
12.25
CHAMPIONSHIP HAT
107478
97751
4077.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
12.25
270056
3/1712005
100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER
-
15.77
DRINKING WATER
107479
449079
7411.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PSTF OCCUPANCY
15.77
270066
3/1712006
102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING
65.80
107559
303106
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
3,363.05
107667
304085
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
54.00
107668
303109ADD
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
974.00
107669
303665
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
19.80
107670
304084
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
978.20
107671
304083
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
5,454.85
270057
311712006
100731 DPC INDUSTRIES
2.322.32
CHEMICALS
107627
82700231 -05
5915.6586
WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES
WATER TREATMENT
2,322.32
270058
3117/2005
117864 DYSTE, ANN
25.00
UNIFORM PURCHASE
107588
030705
5820.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
50TH STREET GENERAL
25.00
270059
311712005
100739 EAGLE WINE
2,434.06
107672
201777
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
419.39
107673
201781
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
4,532.43
107752
201784
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
7,385.88
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
3/17/2005 - 3/17/2005
Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
270060 3/1712005 117870 EARLE BROWN HERITAGE CENTER
974.70 2111/05 TECH IN - SERV 107723 9773 - 119309 1554.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
974.70
270061 311712005 100741 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
3/16/2005 13:15:28
Page- 6
Business Unit
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
7,145.10
107560
325233
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
11.00
107561
325232
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
4,457.55
107562
325226
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
30.80
107563
325225
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
6,378.45
107753
325318
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
11.00
107754
325299
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
1,822.05
107755
325298
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
19,855.95
270062
3/1712005
117868 ELK RIVER FORD INC.
11,947.00
2005 FORD TAURUS
107628
28410
1190.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
ASSESSING
11,947.00
2005 FORD TAURUS
107629
28409
1190.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
ASSESSING
23,894.00
270063
311712005
106676 EMEDCO
174.01
SAFETY CONES, SIGNS
107480
210621 -00
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
174.01
270064
311712005
104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC.
32.00
107756
282335
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
32.00
270065
3117/2005
100044 FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE HOSPITAL
777.61
PHARMACY
107630
021005
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
777.61
270066
3/17/2005
100297 FAST FOTO & DIGITAL
23.43
BRAEMAR WEBSITE PHOTOS
107608
T2- 200318
2210.6124
WEB DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNICATIONS
23.43
270067
3/17/2005
113720 FASTENER PLACE
122.92
PLOW BOLTS
107631
14898
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
122.92
270068
3/1712005
113987 FISHER, PETER
100.00
EMS CONFERENCE FEE
107632
030805
1470.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
100.00
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
3/17/2005 — 3/17/2005
Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
270069 3117/2005 102016 FLOWERS OF EDINA
72.42 SYMPATHY 107481 2596 1100.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
72.42
270070 3117/2005 100759 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY
8520 KEYS 107633 736746 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
1550.6040
5610.6136
5913.6201
5511.6201
1552.6511
1301.6201
1646.6201
1553.6201
5440.5511
5440.5511
5440.5511
5440.5511
1553.6406
1553.6530
HOSPITALIZATION
3/1612005 13:15:28
Page - 7
Business Unit
CITY COUNCIL
DISTRIBUTION
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
DISTRIBUTION
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
85.20
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
270071
3/17/2005
105599 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO.
5,300.07
DENTAL PREMIUMS
107482
030105
5,300.07
270072
3117/2005
100457 FRASIER, SCOTT
125.00
PERFORMANCE 3/22/05
107724
030105
125.00
270073
311712005
100764 G & K SERVICES
133.94
107844
022805
138.18
107844
022805
322.94
107844
022805
445.32
107844
022805
449.22
107844
022805
529.50
107844
022805
2,019.10
270074
3/17/2005
101931 GEAR FOR SPORTS
2,021.56
MERCHANDISE
107725
10901817
1,539.27
MERCHANDISE
107726
10901848
354.93
MERCHANDISE
107727
10901784
1.654.09
MERCHANDISE
107728
10901858
5.569.85
270076
3/17/2005
100773 GENERAL PARTS INC.
31.09
-
PILOT TUBES
107634
650819
31.09
270076
3/1712006
100920 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY - MINNEA
1,285.34
PARTS
107609
022805
1,285.34
270077
3/1712006
101103 GRAINGER
1550.6040
5610.6136
5913.6201
5511.6201
1552.6511
1301.6201
1646.6201
1553.6201
5440.5511
5440.5511
5440.5511
5440.5511
1553.6406
1553.6530
HOSPITALIZATION
3/1612005 13:15:28
Page - 7
Business Unit
CITY COUNCIL
DISTRIBUTION
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
DISTRIBUTION
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
CITY OF EDINA
3/16/2005 13:15:28
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 8
3/17/2005
- 3/17/2005
Check # Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
516.63
HAND PALLET, TAPE
107483
498 - 607393 -2
1552.6530
REPAIR PARTS
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
59.00
TIME DELAY FUSES
107484
495- 525605 -4
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
126.18
BATTERIES
107635
495- 925203 -4
- 7411.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PSTF OCCUPANCY
16.77
GAUGES, FUSES
107806
495- 957927 -9
5860.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
222.63
-
GAUGES, FUSES
107806
495- 957927 -9
1551:6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CITY HALL GENERAL
941.21
270078 3/17/2005
102670 GRAND PERE WINES INC
- - --
900.35
107674
00015329
5862.5513
,
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
900.35
270079 3/17/2005
117666 GREAT LAKES GOLF COURSE PRODUC
379.57
SIGNS
107610
503065
5422.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
379.57
270080 3/1712005
100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
931.53
107675
201783
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
2,798.88
107676
201780
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
61.05
107677
201779
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
1,668.45
107678
197547
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
97.75-
107679
660974
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
29.40-
107680
661934
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
38.05-
107681
661935
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1.70
107757
201515
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
.85
107758
201750
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
138.06
107759
201788
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD, MIX
YORK SELLING
14,533.26
107760
201787
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
83.60-
107761
661635
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
48.70-
107762
661969
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
76.85-
107763
6661970
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
19,759.43
270081 3/17/2005
117871 HAMMERLUND MFG. CO. INC.
838.00
OUTDOOR SIGN MATERIALS
107729
10021
5422.6251
SHARED MAINTENANCE
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS .
838.00
270082 3/17/2005
116447 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON IN
233.75
CONSTRUCTION ADMIN
107826
13768
05430.1705.21
CONSULTING INSPECTION
WATERMAIN EXT - OXFORD & 52ND
233.75
270083 3/17/2005
110973 HANSON SPANCRETE MIDWEST
INC.
301.00
PRECAST CONCRETE.
107730
FINAL RET
0.1705
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
PSTF BALANCE SHEE
CITY OF EDINA
3/16/2005 13:15:28
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 9
3/17/2005
— 3/17/2005
Check #
—
Date
- --
Amount
Vendor/ Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
30,901.00
270084
3/17/2005
100799 HEDBERG AGGREGATES
50.00
SEMINAR TICKETS
107611
321427
1640.6104
CONFERENCES 6 SCHOOLS
PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL
50.00
270086
3117/2006
115367 HENGEMUHLE, TIM
50.00
UNIFORM PURCHASE
107586
030705
5860.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
50.00
270086
3/17/2005
105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION
178.30
RADIO ADMIN FEE
107485
25028068
1553.6237
RADIO SERVICE
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1,479.89
RADIO ADMIN FEE
107486
25028010
1400.6151
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
1,658.19
270087
311712006
100806 HOBART CORP
236.08
DISHWASHER REPAIR
107731
21316406
5421.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
GRILL
236.08
270088
3117/2005
104375 HOHENSTEINS INC.
79.50
107682
353494
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
79.50
270089
3/1712005
101365 HONEYWELL INC.
375.95
MONITORING SERVICES
107732
3189776
1470.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
375.95
270090
311712005
101040 HOPKINS TOWN & COUNTRY DODGE
17.73
RESISTOR
107487
113905
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
17.73
270091
3/17/2006
102942 HOWARD R GREEN COMPANY
2,709.00
GYMNASIUM TRAFFIC STUDY
107827
47158
1260.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ENGINEERING GENERAL
2,70900
270092
3/1712005
116779 HOWARD'S JEWELRY INC.
242.01
MERCHANDISE
107733
INV17946
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
242.01
270093
3117/2006
101183 INSPECTRON INC.
2,667.50
INSPECTION SERVICES
107488
030205
1495.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
INSPECTIONS
2,667.50
CITY OF EDINA
3/1612005 13:15:28
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 10
3/17/2005
- 3/17/2005
Check -# Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
270094 3/17/2005
116191 INSTY- PRINTS
522.81
NEWSLETTER
107734
69049
2210.6575
PRINTING
COMMUNICATIONS
522.81
270095 3/1712005
104157 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL
92.99
2003 CODE ON CD
107489
0896142 -IN
1495.6405
BOOKS & PAMPHLETS
INSPECTIONS
92.99
270096 3/17/2005
101861 J.H. LARSON COMPANY
34.03
FUSES
107636
4466308 -01
1551.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CITY HALL GENERAL
115.81
LIGHTING
107636
4466308 -01
5311.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POOL OPERATION
149.84
270097 3117/2005
102136 JERRY'S TRANSMISSION SERVICE
28.97
LATCH, DOOR STRIKER
107845
0003549
1553.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
28.97
270098 3/17/2005
102546 JOHN'S AUTO PARTS
426.00
PICK -UP BOX
107490
02449348
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
426.00
270099 3/17/2005
100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.
2,825.52
107683
1867238
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON,SELLING
217.90-
107684
274610
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
57.70-
107685
274611.
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
6,125.80
107764
1867234
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
204.75
107765
1867231
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
58.85
107766
1867235
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE.
YORK SELLING
1,321.80
107767
1867237
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,424.10
107768
1867232
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING -
2,645.33
107769
1867233
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
60.40
107770
1867236
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
680.55
107771
1867230
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
441.41
107772
1867229
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
56.87 .
107773
1867227
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
15, 569.78
270100 3/1712005
104297 K. BELL
191.70
_ ..191.70
MERCHANDISE
107735
0494004 -IN
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
CITY OF EDINA
311612005 13:15:28
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 11
3/17/2005
- 3/17/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
270101
3117/2005
106186 KAEDING & ASSOCIATES INC.
224.00
REHABILITATION PROJECT
107637
490308D
05447.1705.21
CONSULTING INSPECTION
WM447 WELL #4 4701 SOUTHVIEW
224.00
270102
3/1712005
100841 KEPRIOS, JOHN
58.85
DOG FOOD, SUPPLIES
107638
030905
5422.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
58.85
270103
3/17/2005
100846 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO
3.275.10
107564
428982
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
55.00
107774
429520
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
495.40
107775
429521
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
3,825.50
270104
3/1712005
117184 LABOSKY, JOE
46.98
UNIFORM PURCHASE
107589
030705
5860.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
46.98
270105
3117/2005
100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
177.26
SILICONE SEALANT
107639
2959970
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
177.26
270106
311712005
100853 LEEF SERVICES
34.25
SHOP TOWELS
107612
351202
5422.6201
LAUNDRY
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
34.25
270107
311712005
117865 LOEW, DOUG
180.50
CARPET INSTALLATION
107613
030705
5422.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
180.50
270108
311712006
106672 LUGER, JEFF
51.09
DOG FOOD. BISCUITS
107736
030905
5422.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
51.09
270109
3/17/2005
112095 MAGIC CARPET SPECIALISTS INC.
271.58
CARPET CLEANING
107492
21605
5841.6162
SERVICES CUSTODIANS
YORK OCCUPANCY
271.58
270110
3117/2005
100865 MAGNUSON SOD
191.76
SAND, AGG, CONCRETE
107643
55743
5912.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDINGS
19.77
MIXED CONCRETE
107644
55772
5912.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDINGS
211.53
3/16/2005 13:15:28
Page - 12
PSTF OCCUPANCY
PSTF OCCUPANCY
2.025.70
CITY OF EDINA
771558
R55CKREG LOG20000
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
98.00
107566
771559
Council Check Register
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
2,887.68
3/17/2005 -- 3/17/2005
107567
Check # Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
270111 3/17/2006
114699 MANAGED SERVICES INC.
771343
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
87.33
TOWELS, SOAP
107493 026220 7411.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
--
420.68
MAR 2005 SERVICE
107494 607084 7411.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
508.01
107570
771344
270112 3/1712006
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
100868 MARK VII SALES
2,316.50
3/16/2005 13:15:28
Page - 12
PSTF OCCUPANCY
PSTF OCCUPANCY
2.025.70
107565
771558
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
98.00
107566
771559
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
2,887.68
107567
771325
5842.5514.
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
.03
107568
771343
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
43.90
107569
771345
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
2.194 -05
107570
771344
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
2,316.50
.107776
773764
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
1,735.80
107777
772007
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
1,178.00
107778
772956
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
12,479.66
270113 311712006
102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC
295.00
PHONE CHANGES
107614
23311
1550.6188
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
295.00
270114 3117/2005
100870 MATRX
37.93
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
107642
883733
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
37.93
270115 3117/2005
117868 MCCONVILLE, MARK
25.00
UNIFORM PURCHASE
107580
030705
5840.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
25.00
270116 311712006
117865 MCLAUGHLIN INVESTMENTS INC.
1,019.00
HAND TOOLS
.107495
823
1480.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
SPECIAL OPERATIONS
1.019.00
270117 3/17/2005
105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS
2.150.50
EAGLE CENTER TRIP
107737
031005
1628.6103.07
TRIPS PROF SERVICES
SENIOR CITIZENS
2,150.50
270118 3/17/2005
100953 MEDTRONIC PHYSIO CONTROL CORP.
433.38
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
107738
PC607248
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
32.30-
CREDIT
107739
PC526933
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
01.08
CITY OF EDINA
3/16/2005 13:15:28
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page- 13
3/17/2005
- 3/17/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor I Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
270119
3/17/2005
117872 MEICHELS, JOYCE
52.00
TRIP REFUND
107740
031005
1628.4392.07
SENIOR TRIPS
SENIOR CITIZENS
52.00
270120
3/1712005
101483 MENARDS
25.30
PAINT
107496
6051
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
79.77
MAILBOXES, NUMBERS
107497
5728
1318.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
123.65
HAND TOOLS
107498
5543
1301.6556
TOOLS
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
92.86
CORDS, LIGHTS, HAMMER
107741
6380
5420.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CLUB HOUSE
48.82
OAK CASING, CHISEL SET
107742
5590
5421.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GRILL
31.91
OAK CASING
107743
5737
5421.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GRILL
402.31
270121
3/1712005
100882 MERIT SUPPLY
1,492.17
TISSUE, LINERS, CLEANERS
107615
66442
5511.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
1,492.17
270122
3/17/2005
102602 METRO CASH REGISTER SYSTEMS
3,473.22
GREENKEEPER SOFTWARE
107828
59389
5410.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
535.00
PC CHARGE CREDIT CARD SOFTWARE
107829
59549
5410.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
4,008.22
270123
3/17/2005
100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME
45.39
STRENGTH CHARGE
107645
0000791599
5915.6260
LICENSES & PERMITS
WATER TREATMENT
45.39
270124
311712005
102550 MFAPC
35.00
2005 DUES
107641
030805
1470.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
35.00
270126
311712006
101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY
983.69
TISSUE, LINERS, CLEANERS
107616
23367
1551.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
CITY HALL GENERAL
983.69
270126
3117/2005
100692 MIDWEST COCA -COLA EAGAN
289.00
107571
81284354
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
236.70
-
107572
83624186
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
525.70
270127
3/17/2005
116929 MIDWEST HOUSING COLLABORATIVE,
6.527.23
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
107646
030805
1508.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
RPC
CITY OF EDINA
3/16/2005 13:15:28
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 14
3/17/2005
—3/1712005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor/ Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
6,527.23
270128
3/17/2005
103942 MINN FIRE SERVICE CERTIFICATIO
55.00
FFII CERTIFICATION FEE
107491
030405
1470.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
55.00
270129
311712005
103625 MINNEAPOLIS DEPT. OF HEALTH
73.00
LAB TESTS
107499
2005216
1400.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
73.00
,
270130
311712005
100913 MINNEAPOLIS SUBURBAN SEWER & W
1,020.00
WATER SERVICE REPAIR
107647
32630
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
DISTRIBUTION
1.020.00
270131
3117/2006
102568 MINNESOTA CHAPTER IAAI
75.00
DUES
107640
030905
1470.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
75.00
270132
3/17/2005
100066 MINNESOTA MAILING SOLUTIONS
117.08
POSTAGE METER TAPES
107807
28419
1550.6235
POSTAGE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
117.08
270133
3117/2005
100908 MINNESOTA WANNER
31.31
STEEL PIPE
107500
0063066 -IN
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
31.31
270134
3/17/2005
100898 MINVALCO
1.52
GASKET
107501
480095
1301.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
1.52
270135
311712005
104973 MOLBERG, BETH
150.00
PERFORMANCE 3/29/05
107744
030105
5610.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
ED ADMINISTRATION
150.00
270136
3/1712005
110522 MUNICIPAL BUILDERS INC.
15,199.04
PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2
107830
031805
05447.1705.30
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
WM447 WELL #4 4701 SOUTHVIEW
39,900.05
PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2
107830
031805
05448.1705.30
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
WM448 WELL #16 6301 GLEASON
55,099.09
270137
3/17/2005
117873 NCAFDO
45.00
CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
107808
031005
1490.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
PUBLIC HEALTH
45.00
1 '
CITY OF EDINA
.
3/16/2005 13:15:28
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 15
3/17/2005
-3/1712005
Check -9
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
270138
311712005
117863 NEVIN, JOHN
50.00
UNIFORM PURCHASE
107587
030705
5820.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
50TH STREET GENERAL
50.00
270139
311712006
104672 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
987.00
107648
757391129
1470.6151
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
29.01
107809
873184124027
1240.6188
TELEPHONE
PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL
29.01
107809
873184124027
1553.6188
TELEPHONE
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
29.01
107809
873184124027
1325.6188
TELEPHONE
STREET NAME SIGNS
29.01
107809
873184124027
4090.6188
TELEPHONE
STREET REVOLVING
87.03
107809
873184124027
1280.6188
TELEPHONE
SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD
97.76
107809
873184124027
1301.6188
TELEPHONE
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
143.52
107809
873184124027
1260.6188
TELEPHONE
ENGINEERING GENERAL
151.58
107809
873184124027
1322.6188
TELEPHONE
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
169.84
107809
873184124027
1640.6188
TELEPHONE
PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL
474.41
107809
873184124027
5910.6188
TELEPHONE
GENERAL (BILLING)
2,227.18
270140
311712005
102551 NFPA
417.45
BROCHURES
107649
3045314Y
1470.6614
FIRE PREVENTION
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
417.45
270141
3/1712005
117102 NORTH AMERICAN SALT CO.
998.58
ICE CONTROL SALT
107503
11215207
1318.6525
SALT
SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
2,912.31
ICE CONTROL SALT
107504
11216028
1318.6525
SALT
SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
3,910.89
270142
3117/2005
117856 NRC
405.00
CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
107505
030705
5952.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
RECYCLING
405.00
270143
311712005
100936 OLSEN COMPANIES
90.60
WRENCH
107506
325842
1646.6556
TOOLS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
90.60
270144
3117/2005
101439 OLSEN FIRE INSPECTION
330.00
SPRINKLER TEST
107810
2501086
5210.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
330.00
270145
3/17/2006
100315 OMEGA INDUSTRIES
100.90
CHAIN SAW REPAIRS
107650
6622
1470.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation
107745
030405
94.68
CHAIN SAW PARTS
107745
030405
195.58
PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS
270146
3117/2005
5822.5513
117860 OPP, BRIAN
107574
8062882 -CM
24.00
UNIFORM PURCHASE
107686
8063326 -IN
24.00
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
270147
3117/2005
5822.5513
100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC.
107779
8063329 -IN
890.00
SERVICE CONTRACT
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
890.00
107782
270148
3/17/2006
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
100941 PARK NICOLLET CLINIC
107783
2167471
160.00
ACCT 9992000066
50TH ST SELLING
107784
257.00
ACCT 9992000066
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
655.00
ACCT 9992000066
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
1,072.00
107786
270149
3/1712005
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
100347 PAUSTIS & SONS
2,443.76
29.32-
1,615.60
1,635.00
1,560.42
7,225.46
270160
311712005
100946 PERA
77,723.89
PPEND 318/05
77,723.89
270161
3117/2005
100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT;
4,082.55
1.497.95
13.79 -
179.38-
18.66-
779.95
1,210.75
768.13
417.15
119.80
167.05
334.55
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
3/17/2005 - 3/17/2005
PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
107651 4267 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS
107583 030705 5840.6406
107811 83277 5210.6230
GENERAL SUPPLIES
3/16/2005 13:15:28
Page - 16
Business Unit
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF DOME PROGRAM
107745
030405
1400.6175
PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS
107745
030405
1550.6121
ADVERTISING PERSONNEL
107745
030405
1470.6175
PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS
107573
8062048 -IN
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
107574
8062882 -CM
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
107686
8063326 -IN
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
107687
8063327 -IN
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
107779
8063329 -IN
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
107746 031105 1000.2023 P.E.R.A. PAYABLE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
107688
2174470
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
107689
2174471
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
107690
3314064
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
107691
3314061
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
107692
3314062
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
107780
2174466
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
107781
2174467
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
107782
2174465
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
107783
2167471
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
107784
2167469
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
107785
2174464
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
107786
2174463
2.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
CITY OF EDINA
3/16/2005 13:15:28
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 17
3/17/2005
-3/17/2005
Check # Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
161.90
107787
2174462
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
9,427.95
270162 3/17/2006
101110 POLLY NORMAN PHOTOGRAPHY
25.00
HULBERT PHOTO
107652
030905
1100.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CITY COUNCIL
25.00
270153 3/17/2006
116396 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC
15.14
CO2 TANK RENTAL
107507
915687
7413.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PSTF FIRE TOWER
15.14
270154 311712006
102642 PRESTIGE FLAG
363.26
GOLF FLAGS
107617
131855
5422.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
363.26
270155 311712005
100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY
490.70
107693
201782
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
1,455.88
107694
201778
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
31.00
107788
201786
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
941.56
107789
201785
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
2,919.16
270166 3/1712006
100969 PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING ENGINEE
779.60
RADIUM STUDY
107812
03011.10
5915.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
WATER TREATMENT
1,720.00
BACKWASH RECYCLE SYS
107831
03034.16
05427.1705.20
CONSULTING DESIGN
PLANT #3 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYST
2,000.00
BACKWASH RECYCLE SYS
107831
03034.16
05425.1705.20
CONSULTING DESIGN
PLANT #2 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYST
548.00
CONSTRUCTION PERIOD SERVICES
107832
03012.23
05413.1705.21
CONSULTING INSPECTION
WATER TREATMENT PLANT #2
300.00
BACKWASH RECYCLE SYS
107833
03034.17
05425.1705.20
CONSULTING DESIGN
PLANT #2 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYST
460.00
BACKWASH RECYCLE SYS
107833
03034.17
05427.1705.20
CONSULTING DESIGN
PLANT #3 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYST
5,807.60
270158 311712005
100971 QUALITY WINE
56.38-
107575
522121 -00
5820.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
50TH STREET GENERAL
5,690.40
107575
522121 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
45.65-
107695
524794 -00
5860.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
2,302.92.
107695
524794 -00
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
15,17-
107696
524781 -00
5860.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
1,532.40
107696
524781 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
17,27-
107697
524592 -00
5860.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
1,748.19
107697
524592 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
15.93-
107698
524602 -00
5820.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
50TH STREET GENERAL
1,614.04
107698
524602 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/16/2005 13:15:28
Council Check Register Page - 18
3/17/2005 -- 3/17/2005
Check # Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
14.74-
107699
524782 -00
5820.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
50TH STREET GENERAL
742.80
107699
524782 -00
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
20.20-
107700
524783 -00
5820.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
50TH STREET GENERAL
2,037.22
107700
524783 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
23.87-
107790
524666 -00
5840.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
1,203.10
107790
524666 -00
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
45.46-
107791
524793 -00
5840.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
2,287.93
107791
524793 -00
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
18.85-
107792
524591 -00
5840.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
1,911.64
107792
524591 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
13.34-
107793
524806 -00
5840.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
1,347.46
107793
524806 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
22,131.24
270159 311712005
101965 QWEST
51.16
952 926 -0092
107508
0092 -3/05
5913.6188
TELEPHONE
DISTRIBUTION
565.90
612 E24 -8659
107509
8659 -3/05
1470.6188
TELEPHONE
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
876.00
612 E01 -0426
107510
0426 -3/05
1550.6188
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
91.08
952 926 -0419
107511
0419 -3/05
1646.6188
TELEPHONE
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
282.95
612 E24 -8656
107512
8656 -3/05
1550.6188
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
504.60
612 E24 -8657
107513
8657 -3/05
5420.6188
TELEPHONE
CLUB HOUSE
282.95
612 E24 -8661
107514
8661 -3105
1550.6188
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
57.46
107515
022805
1628.6188
TELEPHONE
SENIOR CITIZENS
87.88
107515
022805
5861.6188
TELEPHONE
VERNON OCCUPANCY
98.48
107515
022805
5821.6188
TELEPHONE
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
99.15
107515
022805
5841.6188
TELEPHONE
YORK OCCUPANCY
165.08
107515
022805
1622.6188
TELEPHONE
SKATING & HOCKEY
165.95
107515
022805
5610.6188
TELEPHONE
ED ADMINISTRATION
193.69
107515
022805
1470.6188
TELEPHONE
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
218.23
107515
022805
1646.6188
TELEPHONE
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
237.40
107515
022805
5932.6188
TELEPHONE
GENERAL STORM SEWER
253.62
107515
022805
5511.6188
TELEPHONE
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
354.05
107515
022805
5911.6188
TELEPHONE
PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER
1,798.68
107515
022805
1550.6188
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
6,384.31
270160 3/1712005
117692 R & B CLEANING INC.
447.30
STAIRWELL CLEANING
107516
1201
1375.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PARKING RAMP
447.30
270161 3/1712005
117862 RANTA, LIISA
50.00
UNIFORM PURCHASE
107585
030705
7.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
VERNON LIQUOR GEN'
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date Amount
50.00
270162 311712005
99.95
109.65
126.65
126.65
266.05
728.95
Vendor / Explanation
100976 RED WING SHOE STORE
SAFETY BOOTS
SAFETY BOOTS
SAFETY BOOTS
SAFETY BOOTS
SAFETY BOOTS
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
3/17/2005 - 3/17/2005
PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
107653 7250000251
107653 7250000251
107653 7250000251
107653 7250000251
107653 7250000251
270163 3117/2006
101963 S & S TREE AND HORTICULTURAL
S
2,499.99
TREE PRUNING
107834
50771
2,499.99
270164 3/17/2005
100987 SA -AG INC
146.05
FILL SAND
107517
41688
172.67
FILL SAND
107518
41675
318.72
270166 3/17/2006
103369 SANKEY, MOREAU J.
60.44
CONFERENCE EXPENSE
107813
031105
60.44
270166 3/17/2005
116905 SCREENING AND SELECTION SERVIC
38.00
DRUG TESTING
107519
824865
228.00
DRUG TESTING
107520
824655
266.00
270167 3/17/2006
100996 SEH
755.09
ANTENNA REVIEW
107836
0126593
2,889.97
FEASIBILITY STUDY
107837
0126299
6,000.00
FEASIBILITY STUDY
107837
0126299
6,000.00
FEASIBILITY STUDY
107837
0126299
6,000.00
FEASIBILITY STUDY
107837
0126299
1,169.77
TOPO WORK
107838
0126298
86.00
CITY WORKS
107839
0127208
120.00
CITY WORKS
107839
0127208
172.00
CITY WORKS
107839
0127208
215.00
CITY WORKS
107839
0127208
961.75
CITY WORKS
107839
0127208
240.00
CITY WORKS
107840
0126219
273.75
CITY WORKS
107840
0126219
1646.6610
5630.6406
5420.6406
5511.6406
5620.6406
1644.6103
1318.6517
1316.6517
1190.6104
1550.6121
1550.6121
1260.6103
01212.1705.20
05436.1705.20
04297.1705.20
03413.1705.20
05436.1705.20
1325.6103
5910.6103
5932.6103
5913.6103
5922.6103
5910.6103
5922.6103
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
3/16/2005 13:15:28
Page - 19
Business Unit
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
CENTENNIAL LAKES
CLUB HOUSE
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE
SAND GRAVEL & ROCK SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
SAND GRAVEL & ROCK SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING
ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CONSULTING DESIGN
CONSULTING DESIGN
CONSULTING DESIGN
CONSULTING DESIGN
CONSULTING DESIGN
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ENGINEERING GENERAL
M &O VALLEY LN & VIEW - 66TH ST
PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO WM
PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO ST
PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO SS
PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO WM
STREET NAME SIGNS
GENERAL (BILLING)
GENERAL STORM SEWER
DISTRIBUTION
SEWER TREATMENT
GENERAL (BILLING)
SEWER TREATMENT
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
3/1712005 -3/1712005
Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
645.00 CITY WORKS 107840 0126219 5932.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
25,528.33
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
5822.5514
270168
3117/2005
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
101000
SIR SPEEDY
20,212.26
PRELIMINARY DESIGN
138.45
BUSINESS CARDS
107618
46606
SIDEWALK INTERLACHEN /BLAKE
20, 212.26
138.45
270169
3/1712006
103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC
101002
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS INC
_
38.92
2,119.70
107523
B156022
107701
161611
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
44.12
2.755.75
107524
S135789
107702
161613
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
3.73
27.70
107525
S135806
107703
161612
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
74.49
432.70
107526
5135919
107704
161607
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
129.84
27.70
107527
S135962
107705
161608
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
670.57
5,363.55
107528
SF02360
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
270170
3/17/2005
LABOR (CREDIT)
101021
SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
173.30
34.90
FUEL
5136075
107521
0072436
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
365.75
34.90
107655
SI36119
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
270171
311712005
101004
SPS COMPANIES
1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
322.58 SINKS 107522 51188737.001 1646.6406
211.90 CARTRIDGES 107835 51132423.002 1646.6530
GENERAL SUPPLIES
REPAIR PARTS
3/16/2005 13:15:28
Page- . 20
Business Unit
GENERAL STORM SEWER
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
534.48
270172 3/1712006
101016 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC
20,212.26
PRELIMINARY DESIGN
107841
5211 -3
07091.1705.20
CONSULTING DESIGN
SIDEWALK INTERLACHEN /BLAKE
20, 212.26
270173 3117/2005
103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC
38.92
CLAMPS
107523
B156022
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
44.12
SNAP RINGS, WASHERS
107524
S135789
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
3.73
CIRCLIPS
107525
S135806
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
74.49
LAMPS
107526
5135919
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
129.84
SPRINGS
107527
S135962
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
670.57
LABOR
107528
SF02360
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
670.57 -
LABOR (CREDIT)
107529
SF02406
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
173.30
FILTERS
107654
5136075
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
365.75
GLASS
107655
SI36119
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
830.15
270174 3/17/2005
103976 STEINBACH, BRUCE
65.00
RECERTIFICATION REFUND
107530
030805
0.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
PARK MAINTENANCE r 'AL
3/16/2005 13:15:28
Page - 21
Business Unit
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
21310 WANT AD 107656 760875 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
- - 213.10
270178 3/17/2005 117869 SUNICE
1,439.72
MERCHANDISE
107748
CITY OF EDINA
5440.5511
R55CKREG LOG20000
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
1,439.72
Council Check Register
3/1712005
101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
3/17/2005 - 3/17/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
65.00
2,760.43
107577
270175
3117/2005
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
100277 STENCILS & MARKETING PROD INC
176.007
107749
170.13
STENCILS, PAINT
107747
16277 1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
6.463.13
170.13
270176
3/17/2005
3117/2005
105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC.
102742 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLAN
451.99
TIRES
107534
10034163 1553.6583
TIRES & TUBES
200500770
5913.6180
148.50
TIRES
107535
10034327 1553.6583
TIRES & TUBES
LIFT STATION INSPECTION
107842
511.58
TIRES
107536
10034208 1553.6583
TIRES & TUBES
878.56
1,112.07
270177
3/1712005
3/17/2005
100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS
116346 TODD COUNTY
3/16/2005 13:15:28
Page - 21
Business Unit
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
21310 WANT AD 107656 760875 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
- - 213.10
270178 3/17/2005 117869 SUNICE
1,439.72
MERCHANDISE
107748
20001925
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
1,439.72
270179
3/1712005
101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
3,878.70
107576
364696
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
2,760.43
107577
363889
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
176.007
107749
16653
5421.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
GRILL
6.463.13
270180
3117/2005
102742 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLAN
698.60
WATER LEAK LOCATING
107657
200500770
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
DISTRIBUTION
179.96
LIFT STATION INSPECTION
107842
000200500555
5922.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SEWER TREATMENT
878.56
270181
3/17/2005
116346 TODD COUNTY
300.00
OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT
107531
030705
1000.2055
DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS
GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
300.00
270182
3/17/2005
101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY
74.46
WELDING GASES
107532
468699
1553.6580
WELDING SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
17.46
DEMURRAGE CHARGE
107658
468701
5913.6580
WELDING SUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
91.92
270183
3/17/2005
117857 TOMKO, DAVE
41.98
UNIFORM PURCHASE
107579
030705
5840.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
3117/2005 3/17/2005
Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
5820.6160 DATA PROCESSING
5840.6160 DATA PROCESSING
5860.6160 DATA PROCESSING
3/16/2005 13:15:28
Page - 22
Business Unit
50TH STREET GENERAL
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
1553.6530 . REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1470.6530
REPAIR PARTS
41.98
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
270184
3/17/2005
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
101693 TOTAL REGISTER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
14.20
MONTHLY FTP FILE
107814
18026
1480.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
14.20
MONTHLY FTP FILE
107814
18026
14.20
MONTHLY FTP FILE
107814
18026
42.60
270185
3/17/2005
102175 TRUCK UTILITIES MFG CO
206.26
PUMP MOTOR
107533
0139046
206.26
270186
3/17/2005
102255 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO
38.16
OXYGEN
107659
816403
101.00
OXYGEN
107660
817818
139.16
270187
311712005
100363 U.S. BANK
16.33
107846
031005
48.96
107846
031005
50.02
107846
031005
105.26
107846
031005
217.12
107846
031005
1,213.99
107846
031005
2,413.53
107846
031005
4,065.21
270188
3117/2005
115379 U.S. BANK
175.00
STATE OF THE CITY
107661
030405
1,382.15
TRAINING COSTS
107815
MAR 4
1,557.15
270189
3/17/2005
102026 UNISOURCE
447.89
ABOUT TOWN PAPER
107540
593580110
--
728.62
ABOUT TOWN PAPER
107541
593065407
1,176.51
270190.
3/17/2005
101053 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY
349.95
P.A. SYSTEM PARTS
107537
848814
349.95
P.A. SYSTEM PARTS
107538
813224
349.95-
CREDIT
107539
869989
349.95
5820.6160 DATA PROCESSING
5840.6160 DATA PROCESSING
5860.6160 DATA PROCESSING
3/16/2005 13:15:28
Page - 22
Business Unit
50TH STREET GENERAL
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
1553.6530 . REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1470.6530
REPAIR PARTS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1470.6530
REPAIR PARTS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1480.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
SPECIAL OPERATIONS
1480.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
SPECIAL OPERATIONS
1120.6106
MEETING EXPENSE
ADMINISTRATION
1281.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
TRAINING
2210.6123
MAGAZINE /NEWSLETTER EXPENSE
COMMUNICATIONS
2210.6123
MAGAZINE /NEWSLETTER EXPENSE
COMMUNICATIONS
1552.6530
REPAIR PARTS
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
1552.6530
REPAIR PARTS
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
1552.6530
REPAIR PARTS
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
3/1612005 13:15:28
Page - 23
Business Unit
GRILL
GRILL
GRILL
DISTRIBUTION
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
WATER TREATMENT
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
PARKING RAMP
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
705.20
107706
111176 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
CITY OF EDINA
1,017.20
R55CKREG LOG20000
111076 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
84.00-
107708
110875 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
139.20
Council Check Register
111073 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1.777.60
3/17/2005
- 3/17/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
270191
3117/2005
5862.5513
101908 US FOODSERVICE INC
VERNON SELLING
1,801.79
107710
119151
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
69.07
CUST 114300
107750
030105
5421.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
164.65
CUST 114300
107750
030105
5421.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
428.43
CUST 114300
107750
030105
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
662.15
270192
3/17/2005
103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC.
2,239.49
WATER MAIN REPAIR
107816
9234
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
2,239.49
270193
311712005
101058 VAN PAPER CO.
211.67
PAPER PLATES, UTENSILS
107542
571719
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
211.67
270194
311712005
101064 VESSCO INC.
225.30
PUMP PARTS
107662
33140
5915.6530
REPAIR PARTS
225.30
270195
311712005
102004 VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER
COM
450.00
ADJUST SPRINKLER HEADS
107663
098332
1552.6530
REPAIR PARTS
450.00
270196
3/1712005
102542 WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS /ENG
2.128.00
PARKING RAMP INSPECTION
107843
21- 3239.00 -1
1375.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
2.128.00
270197
3/17/2006
101855 WHALEY MARKETING COMMUNICATION
750.00
PR AND GRAPHICS WORK
107817
B -05 -1
5210.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
.250.00
UPDATE LOGO
107818
B -05 -02
5210.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
1,000.00
270198
3/17/2005
101033 WINE COMPANY, THE
3/1612005 13:15:28
Page - 23
Business Unit
GRILL
GRILL
GRILL
DISTRIBUTION
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
WATER TREATMENT
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
PARKING RAMP
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
705.20
107706
111176 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,017.20
107707
111076 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
84.00-
107708
110875 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
139.20
107794
111073 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1.777.60
270199 3/1712005 101312 WINE MERCHANTS
56.11
107709
118732
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,801.79
107710
119151
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation
80.95 - -- ---
1,655.89
1,007.60
4,602.34
270200 3/17/2005 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC
132.00
181.00
1nA 95-
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
3/17/2005 - 3/17/2005
PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
107795 119149 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
107796 119150 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
107797 119148 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
270201
311712005
5842.5513
101726 XCEL ENERGY
YORK SELLING
107711
26,839.85
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
121.14
162125
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
749.50
107798
162179
5822.5513
141.29
50TH ST SELLING
107546
18822047
227.92
LIGHT & POWER
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
107547
12,874.59
5913.6185
LIGHT & POWER
DISTRIBUTION
3,040.31
18993496
5911.6185
LIGHT & POWER
62.63
107819
18993615
4086.6185
119.49
AQUATIC WEEDS
107820
18993539
248.30
LIGHT & POWER
PONDS & LAKES
107821
42.31
5422.6185
LIGHT & POWER
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
4,643.39
18993073
5311.6185
LIGHT & POWER
49,110.72
107823
270202
3117/2005
LIGHT & POWER
100568 XEROX CORPORATION
25.00
FEB USAGE - BLDG
120.24
FEB USAGE - PK & REC
451.99
FEB USAGE - ADMIN
597.23
270203
311712005
104324 YOUNGBLOOD LUMBER CO.
36.64
WOOD PRODUCT
36.64
270204
3/17/2005
101091 ZIEGLER INC
345.00
GENERATOR CONTRACT
345.00
629.78
Grand Total
3/16/2005 13:15:28
Page 24
Business Unit
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
107578
161896
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
107711
162099
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
107712
162125
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
107798
162179
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
107543
18592682
1321.6185
LIGHT & POWER
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
107544
18816624
1481.6185
LIGHT & POWER
YORK FIRE STATION
107544
18816624
1470.6185
LIGHT & POWER
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
107545
18576288
5932.6185
LIGHT & POWER
GENERAL STORM SEWER
107546
18822047
5430.6185
LIGHT & POWER
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
107547
18955175
5913.6185
LIGHT & POWER
DISTRIBUTION
107664
18993496
5911.6185
LIGHT & POWER
PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER
107819
18993615
4086.6185
LIGHT & POWER
AQUATIC WEEDS
107820
18993539
5933.6185
LIGHT & POWER
PONDS & LAKES
107821
18992564
5422.6185
LIGHT & POWER
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
107822
18993073
5311.6185
LIGHT & POWER
POOL OPERATION
107823
18990685
1330.6185
LIGHT & POWER
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
107548 008352891 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
107549 008352892 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
107550 008352889 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
107824 455090 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
107665 E3809712 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
3/17/2005 — 3/17/2005
PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
Check Total 577,629.78
Total Payments 577,629.78
Business Unit
3/16/2005 13:15:28
Page _ 25
3/16/2005 13:20:34
Page- 1
We confirm to the best of our knowledge
and belief, that these claims
comply in all material respects
with the requirements of the City
of Edina purchasing policies and
procedures dat° 1 7 (.
Finance
City
CITY OF EDINA
R55CKSUM LOG20000
Council Check Summary
3/17/2005 - 311712005
Company
Amount
01000 GENERAL FUND
210,150.93
02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND
6,394.75
04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND
15,324.39
04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND
23.102.23
05100 ART CENTER FUND
29.95
05200 GOLF DOME FUND
2,596.20
05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND
199.41
05400 GOLF COURSE FUND
15,843.22
05500 ICE ARENA FUND
3,945.51
05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND
7,158.85
05800 LIQUOR FUND
152,158.18
05900 UTILITY FUND
100,474.38
05930 STORM SEWER FUND
8,280.68
05950 RECYCLING FUND
405.00
07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND
31,566.10
Report Totals
577,629.78
3/16/2005 13:20:34
Page- 1
We confirm to the best of our knowledge
and belief, that these claims
comply in all material respects
with the requirements of the City
of Edina purchasing policies and
procedures dat° 1 7 (.
Finance
City
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
3/24/2005 -3/24/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
270205
312412005
101833 A.T.O.M.
625.00
COURSE FEE
107940
2279979
1400.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
625.00
270206
3124/2005
100613 AAA
966.29
LICENSE FOR 70.287
107992
031605
1553.6260
LICENSES & PERMITS
966.29
270207
3/2412005
102234 ABDELLA, PAUL
300.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
108262
031705
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
300.00
270208
3/24/2005
102971 ACE ICE COMPANY
27.40
107847
451526
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
37.96
108047
452451
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
30.12
108048
452452
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
37.40
108049
451546
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
132.88
270213
312412005
100614 ACE SUPPLY CO. INC.
199.41
PIPE, INTAKE, CAULK
107875
640183
5311.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
199.41
270214
3/2412005
104225 ADAMS, DAVE
69.98
UNIFORM PURCHASE
108102
031605
1301.6201
LAUNDRY
69.98
270215,
312412005
102191 ADVANCED GRAPHIC SYSTEMS INC.
255.60
TONER
107936
INV00059843
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
255.60
270216
312412005
102128 AEARO CO.
89.00
SAFETY GLASSES
107876
04181955
1301.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
164.00
SAFETY GLASSES
107877
04181959
1301.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
124.00
SAFETY GLASSES
107878
04181953
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
377.00
270217
3/2412005
101077 AIRTEC INC.
317.11
DRILL BITS, CUTOFF WHEELS
107879
294627
1553.6580
WELDING SUPPLIES
317.11
270218
3/2412005
111228 ALDEN POOL & MUNICIPAL SUPPLY
3/23/2005 15:33:52
Page - 1
Business Unit
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
VERNON SELLING
POOL OPERATION
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
3/2412005 —3/24/2005
Check # Date Amount Vendor I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
175 19 SPRINGS 108210 500119 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES.
PROFESSIONAL ,SERVICES
REPAIR PARTS
PRINTING
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
CHEMICALS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
3/23/2005 15:33:52.
Page - 2
Business Unit
WATER TREATMENT
ADMINISTRATION
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
800 MHZ RADIO
800 MHZ RADIO
800 MHZ RADIO
EDINBOROUGH PARK
CITY HALL GENERAL
175.19
270219
3124/2005
103357 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO
383.40
VIDEOTAPES
108171
INV59909
1120.6406
383.40
270220
312412005
100867 ALSTAD, MARIAN
698.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
108263
031705
5110.6103
698.00
270221
312412005
100624 ALTERNATOR REBUILD CO.
126.24
ALTERNATOR
107993
37060
1553.6530
126.24
270222
3/24/2005
116301 AMERICAN COLOR GRAPHICS
2,323.29
SPRING & SUMMER CATALOG
107937
36591
5110.6575
2,323.29
270223
3124/2005
100630 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC.
892.97
COPIER PAPER
107880
157807201
1550.6406
892.97
270224
312412005
101874 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC.
178.00
TRAVEL CHARGERS
107938
40412
1400.6406
178.00
270225
3124/2005
117824 ANDREW CORPORATION
15.98
DELIVERY FEES
108103
7431245
44003.6710
24,435.19
MIKOM SERVICEWDELIVERY
108104
7436944
44003.6710
78,442.15
MIKOM (FAIRVIEW HOSPITAL)
108105
7447401
44003.6710
102,893.32
270226
3/2412005
102646 AQUA LOGIC INC.
-
55.37
DE, ACID
108186
26435
5620.6545
55.37
270227
3/24/2005
103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS
426.49
COFFEE
107939
6013 -457919
1551.6406
426.49
270228
3/24/2005
103857 ASATO, SHEILA
GENERAL SUPPLIES.
PROFESSIONAL ,SERVICES
REPAIR PARTS
PRINTING
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
CHEMICALS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
3/23/2005 15:33:52.
Page - 2
Business Unit
WATER TREATMENT
ADMINISTRATION
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
800 MHZ RADIO
800 MHZ RADIO
800 MHZ RADIO
EDINBOROUGH PARK
CITY HALL GENERAL
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
3/23/2005 15:33:52
Council Check Register
Page - 3
3/24/2005
3/24/2005
Check # Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
880.00
WORKSHOP
108264
031705
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
880.00
270229 3/24/2005
102134 ASHWORTH INC.
772.24
MERCHANDISE
107881
488811
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
772.24
270230 3/24/2005
102817 ASSOCIATED BAG COMPANY
193.11
PLASTIC PERMIT BAGS
107882
X666562
1495.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
INSPECTIONS
193.11
270231 3/24/2005
104069 B.B. WATSON GRAPHIC DESIGN
575.10
BUSINESS CARDS
107941
421
1400.6575
PRINTING
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
575.10
270232 312412005
102195 BATTERIES PLUS
320.04
BATTERIES
108211
18- 115383
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
320.04
270233 312412005
117081 BCG CONSTRUCTION
9,576.00
PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 4
107883
031805
10084.1705.30
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
W 51ST & HALIFAX FED SIDEWALK
9,576.00
270234 312412005
101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION
1,821.00
107848
32658600
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,068.00
107849
32658500
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
59.25
107850
39696500
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
323.80
107851
32658300
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
27.00
107852
39693900
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
197.95
107853
32658400
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
185.00
107854
32658700
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
124.99
107855
39694100
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
120.72
108050
39694000
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLO MIX
YORK SELLING
1,431.00
108051
32658800
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
69.24-
108052
39691400
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
5,289.47
270235 3/24/2005
100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS
18.49
OFFICE SUPPLIES
107942
3729790
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
29.15
OFFICE SUPPLIES
107943
3729700
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
45.78
APPOINTMENT BOOK
107944
3720630
5610.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
ED ADMINISTRATION
24.09-
RETURN
107945
CM3723100
1140.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PLANNING
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
3/23/2005 15:33:52
Council Check Register
Page - 4
3/24/2005
-3/2412005
Check # Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
23.95
OFFICE SUPPLIES
107994
3734120
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
45.97
OFFICE SUPPLIES
107995
3751700
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
101.02
OFFICE SUPPLIES
107995
3751700
1160.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FINANCE
7.60
OFFICE SUPPLIES
107996
3753490
1190.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ASSESSING
11.77
FOLDERS
107997
3734830
1470.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
16.31
MARKERS, SHEARS
108106
3749140
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
24.48
WEEKLY PLANNER
108107
3749400
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
300.43
270236 3/24/2005
105116 BJB ART STUDIO INC
270.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
108265
031705
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
270.00
270237 3/24/2005
101375 BLOOMINGTON SECURITY SOLUTIONS
16.49
SECURITY KEYS
108212
S41258
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
16.49
270238 312412005
101010 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY
123.55
SWITCHES
107884
94262562
1552.6530
REPAIR PARTS
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
123.55
270239 3/24/2005
117998 BOSCH, LELAN
76.98
REIMBURSEMENT
107998
031605
2210.6408
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
COMMUNICATIONS
76.98
270240 3/24/2005
100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS
522.27-
CREDIT
107885
712711 C
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
217.58
STRAP ASSEMBLIES
107886
718782
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
18.11
CAP SPINDLES
107887
718672
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
19.08
MUFFLER PIECE
107888
725704
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
172.84
HINGE
107889
15858SAV
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
108.39
CLAMPS, PEDAL ASSEMBLIES
107890
726379
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
79.47
SENDER ASSEMBLY
108213
725424
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
59.32
ROLLERS, SPRING EYES
108214
727727
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
65.18
CHAIN RACK
108215
728406
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
18.49
ROLLERS
108216
728781
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
236.19
-
270241 3/2412005
105254 BOYERS BLADES
20.00
SAW BLADE
108217
. 2005004
1301.6556
TOOLS
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
20.00
R55CKREG LOG20000
1,192.00
CITY OF EDINA
270247
3/24/2005
Council Check Register
3/24/2005 -3/24/2005
TRACTOR PARTS
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor! Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
270242
3/2412005
S08094
103239 BRIN NORTHWESTERN GLASS CO.
REPAIR PARTS
117.48
1,509.90
DOOR REPAIRS
108108
582873 5841.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
3/24/2005
240.00-
CREDIT
108109
582873CR 5841.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
1,269.90
FITTINGS, COUPLERS
107892
3 -69194
1553.6530
270243
3/24/2005
104595 BUCKENTINE, JOHN
COUPLERS, VALVE KIT
108001
3 -70318
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
99.48
UNIFORM PURCHASE
107891
031105 1646.6201
LAUNDRY
3 -70348
1553.6530
99.48
56.74
PIGGY BACK
270244
3/2412005
1553.6530
102398 BUDGET PROJECTOR REPAIR
12.82
LAMP
108004
65.00
REPAIRS
107946
2608 5125.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
12.16
HOSE ASSEMBLY
65.00
3 -70489
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
270245
312412005
BRAKE
102365 BURTON GOLF INC
3 -70628
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
3/2312005 15:33:52
Page - 5
Business Unit
YORK OCCUPANCY
YORK OCCUPANCY
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
MEDIA STUDIO
368.68 GOLF BAGS 108218 162122 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
368.68
270246 3/24/2005 102046 CAMPE, HARRIET
1,192.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 108266 031705 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
1,192.00
270247
3/24/2005
100679 CARLSON TRACTOR & EQUIPMENT
13.49
TRACTOR PARTS
107999
S08272
5422.6530
REPAIR PARTS
103.99
TRACTOR PARTS
108000
S08094
5422.6530
REPAIR PARTS
117.48
270248
3/24/2005
100681 CATCO
144.17
FITTINGS, COUPLERS
107892
3 -69194
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
388.27
COUPLERS, VALVE KIT
108001
3 -70318
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
252.68
MOTOR
108002
3 -70348
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
56.74
PIGGY BACK
108003
3 -70411
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
12.82
LAMP
108004
1 -33065
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
12.16
HOSE ASSEMBLY
108219
3 -70489
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
68.17
BRAKE
108220
3 -70628
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
935.01
270249
3/24/2005
102372 COW GOVERNMENT INC.
826.74
TONER, DRUM KITS
108110
RD67445
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
828.74
270250
3/2412005
116353 CHIPPEWA GRAPHICS INC.
909.97
ENVELOPES
108172
7015
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CITY OF EDINA
3/2312005 15:33:52
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 6
3124/2005
—3/24/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
909.97
270251
3124/2005
118007 CHONG, AESON
112.80
AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT
108173
031805
1470.4329
AMBULANCE FEES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
112.80
270252
3124/2005
102691 CHRISTOFFER, KELLI
89.41
ART SUPPLIES
108174
031805
1629.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ADAPTIVE RECREATION
89.41
270253
3/24/2005
102123 CIT GROUP /COMMERCIAL SERVICES,
105.64
MERCHANDISE
107893
303417
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
1,418.60
MERCHANDISE
107894
303772
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
1,524.24
270254
3/24/2005
100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON
4,939.34
WATER ANALYSIS
108221
031705
5915.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
WATER TREATMENT
4,939.34
270255
3/2412005
100688 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERVICES INC
14.38
WINDOW CLEANING
107895
351279
5861.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
VERNON OCCUPANCY
16.62
WINDOW CLEANING
107895
351279
5821.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
27.04
WINDOW CLEANING
107895
351279
5841.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
YORK OCCUPANCY
58.04
270256
312412005
116304 CLAY, DON
567.50
MEDIA INSTRUCTOR
108267
031705
5125.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
MEDIA STUDIO
567.50
270257
3/24/2005
101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS
430.44
GLOVES, HARD HATS
108005
02526076
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
430.44
270258
3/24/2005 -
118000 CUSTOM SIGNS/TOM BAHR
1,341.90
CEDAR T -SIGNS
108006
1447
5422.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
1,341.90
270259
3124/2005
111057 D.A.R.E. AMERICA MERCHANDISE
60.60
DARE MATERIALS
107947
MN -40853
1425.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DARE
60.60
270260
3124/2005
102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation
DISPENSER BAGS
250.00
2,670.20
Page - 7
270266 3/2412005
100730
38.40
6,754.15
LEGAL
PO # Doc No
20.80
Account No
Subledger Account Description
270267 312412005
1,063.75
EAGLE WINE
836.66
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
800.00
399.10
304082
5862.5515
842.65
VERNON SELLING
107870
304984
460.00
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
108053
400.00
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
2,339.10
304522
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
53.00
108055
304965
5822.5514
8,687.90
50TH ST SELLING
270261
3/2412005
5862.5514
100713 DAY - TIMERS INC.
VERNON SELLING
108300
99.02
DESK ARMORHIDE SET
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
99.02
304985
270262
3/24/2005
VERNON SELLING
118011 DESIGN IMAGING GROUP
304986
5862.5515
30.00
LANDSCAPE SOFTWARE
108187
54192336
30.00
OFFICE SUPPLIES
270263
3/24/2005
16397 -02
106022 DEVANT LTD
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL TURF CARE
663.07
MERCHANDISE
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
663.07
108224
270264
3124/2005
ADVERTISING OTHER
102831 DEX MEDIA EAST
108224
025089504000
90.70
TELEPHONE
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
108224
122.60
5420.6188
270265 3/24/2005
100420
DOGGIE WALK BAGS
250.00
DISPENSER BAGS
250.00
Page - 7
270266 3/2412005
100730
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
6,754.15
LEGAL
PO # Doc No
6,754.15
Account No
Subledger Account Description
270267 312412005
100739
EAGLE WINE
836.66
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
399.10
304082
5862.5515
CITY OF EDINA
3/2312005 15:33:52
Council Check Register
Page - 7
3/24/2005
-3/24/2005
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
107856
304081
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
107857
304082
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
107870
304984
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
108053
304974
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
108054
304522
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
108055
304965
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
108056
304646
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
108300
305311
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
108301
304985
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
108302
304986
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
108187
54192336
5610.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
ED ADMINISTRATION
108222
16397 -02
1643.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL TURF CARE
108223
168609
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
108224
025089504000
5110.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
108224
025089504000
5511.6188
TELEPHONE
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
108224
025089504000
5420.6188
TELEPHONE
CLUB HOUSE
108224
025089504000
5610.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
ED ADMINISTRATION
107948
200503073
1647.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PATHS & HARD SURFACE
108225
1223666
1195.6131
PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL
LEGAL SERVICES
108057
205067
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
108058
205073
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
CITY OF EDINA
3/23/2005 15:33:52,
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 8
3/24/2005
—3/24/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
657.41
108059
205070
.5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING _
10.36-
108060
662043
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
8.28-
108061
662055
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
1,874.53
270268
3/24/2005
100741 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
4,295.40
108062
325300
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
1,938.15
108143
325395
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
2,972.80
108303
325396
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
3,837.80
108304
325409
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
13,044.15
270269
3/24/2005
116186 ECHO PROJECT
900.00
ECHO PROJECT
108007
2005 -7
4204.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
HEALTH ALERT NETWORK
900.00
270270
3124/2005
118012 ECKLUND, MATTHEW
153.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
108268
031705
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
153.00
270271
3/24/2005
100742 ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION DIVISI
141.65
PEST CONTROL
108188
4335088
5630.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
CENTENNIAL LAKES
141.65
PEST CONTROL
108189
4240139
5630.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
CENTENNIAL LAKES
283.30
270272
3/24/2005
106340 EDINA CAR WASH
264.12
FEB WASHES
107949
2052
1553.6238
CAR WASH
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
264.12
270273
3/24/2005
103261 EDINA CLEANERS
28.90
LINEN CLEANING
108190
100513915
5620.6201
LAUNDRY
EDINBOROUGH PARK
28.90
270274
3/24/2005
101341 EDINA FIREFIGHTER'S RELIEF ASS
3,000.00
FIRE RELIEF ASSOC
108008
031605
1400.4218
POLICE AID 1%
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
426,471.00
FIRE STATE AID - 2004
108008
031605
1400.4218
POLICE AID 1%
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
429,471.00
270275
3/24/2005
102955 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS
120.66
FEB 13 FIELD TRIP
108175
05 -010
1629.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ADAPTIVE RECREATION
120.66
CITY OF EDINA
3/23/2005 15:33:52
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 9
3/24/2005
-3124/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
270276
3/2412005
102340 EDMUNDS, LIZ
98.35
107858
769
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
98.35
108144
768
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
196.70
270277
3/2412005
118010 EGAN, BILL
50.00
BEAVER REMOVAL
108226
001
1644.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
TREES & MAINTENANCE
50.00
270278
3/2412005
105758 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE
6.10
REPAIR
108227
RP031505 -3
1553.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
6.10
270279
3/24/2005
115080 ENO, SARA
100.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
108269
031705
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
100.00
270280
3/24/2005
105339 ENRGI
1,857.50
WEBSITE CONSULTING
108111
2539
2210.6124
WEB DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNICATIONS
200.00
WEBSITE CONSULTING
108176
2551
2210.6124
WEB DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNICATIONS
2,057.50
270281
3/2412005
102357 ENVIROMATIC CORPORATION OF AME
374.28
CLEAN EXHAUST /HOOD
108140
122792
5421.6102
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
GRILL
374.28
270282
3124/2005
117436 ERNST, MARCIA
155.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
108270
031705
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
155.00
270283
3/2412005
100756 FEDERAL EXPRESS
36.47
SHIPPING CHARGES
107950
5- 411 -63391
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
36.47
270284
3/2412005
101432 FERRELLGAS
357.63
PROPANE
107951
00011464
1646.6186
HEAT
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
357.63
270285
3124/2005
104474 FILTERFRESH
326.65
COFFEE
108009
94743
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
326.65
207.77
CLEANING SUPPLIES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
TELEPHONE
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
3,920.00
CITY OF EDINA
3/23/2005 15:33:52
R55CKREG LOG20000
3/24/2005
108632 GALLES CORPORATION
285.95
MIRACLE CLEAN
107896
Council Check Register
1470.6511
Page - 10
285.95
3/24/2005
—3/24/2005
270291
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
270286
3/2412005
107952
101475 FOOTJOY
1400.6103
110.00
99.78
SHOES
108112
3275600
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES "
117.11
SHOES
108113
3277020
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
10905244
5440.5511
216.89
2,096.85
270287
3124/2005
270293
105202 FORNER, MARY
101867 GETSINGER, DONNA
140.00
ADAPTIVE STAFF
108177
031805
1629.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ADAPTIVE RECREATION
140.00
270294
270288
3124/2005
104652 GILLIS, LOUISE
100760 FOWLER ELECTRIC
260.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
375.48
ENGINE
108010
61316400
5422.6530
REPAIR PARTS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
375.48
270295
3/2412005
101146 GLOBAL CROSSING TELECOMMUNICAT
270289
3/24/2005
103039 FREY, MICHAEL
2n7 77
108297
9006454867
1550.6188
1,540.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
108271
031705
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
2,380.00
MEDIA INSTRUCTOR
108271
031705
5125.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
MEDIA STUDIO
207.77
CLEANING SUPPLIES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
TELEPHONE
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
3,920.00
270290
3/24/2005
108632 GALLES CORPORATION
285.95
MIRACLE CLEAN
107896
1086688
1470.6511
285.95
270291
3/2412005
102419 GARDEN & ASSOCIATES INC
110.00
INTERPRETER
107952
40352
1400.6103
110.00
270292
3/24/2005
101931 GEAR FOR SPORTS
2,096.85
MERCHANDISE
108228
10905244
5440.5511
2,096.85
270293
3124/2005
101867 GETSINGER, DONNA
288.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
108272
031705
5110.6103
288.00
270294
3/24/2005
104652 GILLIS, LOUISE
260.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
108273
031705
5110.6103
260.00
270295
3/2412005
101146 GLOBAL CROSSING TELECOMMUNICAT
2n7 77
108297
9006454867
1550.6188
207.77
CLEANING SUPPLIES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
TELEPHONE
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
3/24/2005 -3/24/2005
Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
270296 3/2412005 101156 GOPHER SIGN CO.
3 646 56 SIGN POSTS 107897 00062796 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS
3/23/2005 15:33:52
Page - 11
Business Unit
STREET NAME SIGNS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FINANCE
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
TOOLS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
TOOLS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
TOOLS
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT
ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
EDINBOROUGH PARK
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY
GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK
3,646.56
270297 312412005
100780 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC.
272.70
FEB 05 SERVOCE
107898
5020310
5913.6103
272.70
270298 3/24/2005
102383 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS
AS
135.00
MEMBERSHIP
108178
0007117 -2005
1160.6105
135.00
270299 3/24/2005
100781 GRAFIX SHOPPE
275.00
MOTORCYCLE GRAPHICS
107953
40001
1400.6215
275.00
270300 3/24/2005
101103 GRAINGER
60.09
FILE SET, BEVEL, TAPE
107899
495- 878655 -2
1301.6556
92.64
3 -PHASE LINE MONITOR
107900
495 - 163662 -2
1400.6406
147.61
FILE SETS, TAPPING TOOL
107901
495 - 254843 -8
5913.6406
38.53
FUSE BLOCKS
107902
973 - 518487 -2
1301.6406
128.92
DOOR CLOSER
107903
495 -010256 -8
5410.6406
5.11
COVERS
108114
495 -451556 -7
5111.6406
88.10
PLUG, RECEPTACLE
108115
495- 451554 -2
5111.6406
213.94
CROSS VISES
108116
498- 216358 -8
5422.6556
50.57
BATTERIES, DRILL KIT
108191
498- 137472 -3
5620.6406
27.75
SOCKET SET
108192
498 - 137473 -1
5620.6556
853.26
270301 3/24/2005
102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC
1,801.50
108063
71309
5842.5513
507.00
108145
71404
5862.5513
375.75
108305
71405
5822.5513
2,684.25
270302 312412005
101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE
15.98
2 KEYBOARDS
108117
031605
5840.6406
63.69
CELL PHONE CHARGES
108117
031605
5841.6188
79.67
270303 3/2412005
100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC.
168.48
LIGHT BULBS
108193
907448258
5620.6406
3/23/2005 15:33:52
Page - 11
Business Unit
STREET NAME SIGNS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FINANCE
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
TOOLS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
TOOLS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
TOOLS
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT
ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
EDINBOROUGH PARK
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY
GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK
CITY OF EDINA
3/23/2005 15:33:52
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 12
3/24/2005
-3/24/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
168.48
270304
3/24/2005
102125 GREG LESSMAN SALES
1,720.07
MERCHANDISE
107904
29645
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
1,720.07
270305
3124/2005
102688 GRIFFITHS, GEORDIE
50.00
MEDIA INSTRUCTOR
108274
031705
5125.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
MEDIA STUDIO
50.00
270306
3/24/2005
100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
3.40
107859
197756
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
2,005.70 -
108064
205076
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
126.14
108065
205075
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
8.50
108066
204810
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
50.89
108067
205072.
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
28.00-
108068
662404
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,526.02
108306
205069
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
123.40
108307
203503
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
3,816.05
270307
3/2412005
100787 GRUBER'S POWER EQUIPMENT
3,860.63
LAWN TRACTOR.
107954
3077
1650.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
3,860.63
270308
3/24/2005
100791 HALLMAN OIL COMPANY
252.14
OIL
108229
147680
5911.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER
252.14
270309
3/2412005
105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION
. 1,706.42
RADIO LEASE
107905.
25028009
1470.6151
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
48.61
TRANSACTION PROCESSING
108011
25027173
1190.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
ASSESSING
53.63
TRANSACTION PROCESSING
108011
25027173
1400.6160
DATA PROCESSING
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
1,808.66
270310
3124/2005
102460 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
1,688.15
ASSESSMENTS PROCESSING
107955
44720
4001.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
WORK CAP REVENUES
1,688.15
270311
3/24/2005
104332 HILL, PRISCILLA
1,380.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
108275
031705
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
1,380.00
CITY OF EDINA
3/23/2005 15:33:52
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 13
3/24/2005
-- 3/24/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
270312
312412005
100805 HIRSHFIELD'S
16.36
VARNISH, PUTTY STICKS
107906
003965920
1301.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
116.38
PAINT
108194
011761654
5620.6532
PAINT
EDINBOROUGH PARK
132.74
270313
3/24/2005
104375 HOHENSTEINS INC.
103.80
107860
353496
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
377.50
107861
353495
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
481.30
270314
312412005
105461 HOLL, SHELLEY
370.00
MEDIA INSTRUCTOR
108276
031705
5125.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
MEDIA STUDIO
370.00
270315
3/24/2005
100808 HORWATH, THOMAS
162.00
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
107956
031505
1644.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
TREES & MAINTENANCE
162.00
270316
3/24/2005
102114 HUEBSCH
101.93
TOWEL & RUG CLEANING
108195
218902
5620.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
EDINBOROUGH PARK
101.93
270317
3/24/2005
100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP.
57.51
TUBING
108230
381569
5915.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
WATER TREATMENT
57.51
270318
3/2412005
100818 INTERSTATE COMPANIES INC.
42.49
PLUG ASSEMBLIES
108012
00159676
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
42.49
270319
3/24/2005
105530 ISD #271
230.00
'THE PERFECT SHOW"
108118
031605
1600.4390.15
GEN ADAPTIVE REC
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
230.00
270320
3/2412005
101861 J.H. LARSON COMPANY
243.50
ELECTRIC CONNECTORS, PLUGS
108013
4464631 -02
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
243.50
270321
3124/2005
100830 JERRY S PRINTING
3,025.67
2005 GOLF BROCHURE
108014
31728
5410.6575
PRINTING
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
3,025.67
270325 3124/2005 103654 JOHNSON, DENISE
512.00 INSTRUCTOR AC
512.00
Subledger Account Description
PRINTING
3/23/2005 15:33:52
Page - 14
Business Unit
ADAPTIVE RECREATION
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
CITY OF
EDINA
R55CKREG LOG20000
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
Council Check Register
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
3/24/2005
-3/24/2005
Check # Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
270322 3/2412005
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
102146 JESSEN PRESS
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
724.20
AR&LE BROCHURE
108179
50833
1629.6575
50TH ST SELLING
724.20
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
270324 3/24/2005
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
1,874.02
107862
1867228
5822.5513
3,952.14
107863
1867240
5862.5512
30.94
107864
1867241
5862.5515
1,942.36
108146
1870616
5862.5513
186.20-
108147
275725
5842.5512
100.94-
108148
276140
5822.5512
83.70-
108149
275727
5842.5513
70.80-
108150
275726
5842.5512
80.85-
108151
275724
5842.5513
135.45-
108152
275723
5842.5512
5.51-
108153
276144
5842.5513
56.95-
108154
276139
5842.5513
125.70-
108155
276141
5842.5512
9.65-
108156
276146
5862.5513
18.30-
108157
276145
5862.5513
10.35-
108158
276143
5862.5513
4,231.13
108308
1870618
5862.5512
966.34
108309
1870617
5862.5512
1,319,28
108310
1870612
5842.5512
3,233.24
108311
1870613
5842.5512
581.85
108312
1870608
5822.5513
845.65
108313
1870610
5822.5512
196.01
108314
1870609
5822.5512
109.95
108315
1870607
5822.5512
2,339.62
108316
1867239
5862.5512
95.60
108317
1870619
5862.5515
127.33-
108318
276142
5862.5512
20,706.40
270325 3124/2005 103654 JOHNSON, DENISE
512.00 INSTRUCTOR AC
512.00
Subledger Account Description
PRINTING
3/23/2005 15:33:52
Page - 14
Business Unit
ADAPTIVE RECREATION
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
108277 031705 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
270326 3/24/2005 102603 JONAS, LENORE
360.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 108278 031705 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
360.00
3/2312005 15:33:52
Page - 15
Business Unit
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
SENIOR CITIZENS
70.00 107871 429665 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
1,362.05 107872 429664 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
1.222.15 108319 429922 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING
270331
3/24/2005
101935 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC.
CITY OF EDINA
R55CKREG LOG20000
7.479.35
PROLASER III
107957
226169
1400.6710
7.479.35
Council Check Register
270332
3/24/2005
100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
3/24/2005 —3/24/2005
Check #
Dale
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
270327
3/24/2005
118013 KAIROS DANCE THEATRE
SCREWS
108016
2983614
1325.6406
50.00
AD
108279
031705 5110.6122'
ADVERTISING OTHER
5913.6406
50.00
664.69
270328
3/24/2005
3/24/2005
101340 KOCHENASH, RICK
101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
504.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
108280
031705 5110.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
1470.6104
504.00
20.00
270329
3/2412005
3124/2005
105887 KOESSLER, JOE
101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
146.00
MARCH SERVICE
108119
030105 1628.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1260.6104
146.00
20.00
270330
3/24/2005
312412005
100846 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO
117407 LEXISNEXIS
3/2312005 15:33:52
Page - 15
Business Unit
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
SENIOR CITIZENS
70.00 107871 429665 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
1,362.05 107872 429664 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
1.222.15 108319 429922 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING
270331
3/24/2005
101935 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC.
7.479.35
PROLASER III
107957
226169
1400.6710
7.479.35
270332
3/24/2005
100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
314.18
HEX NUTS
108015
2983615
1325.6406
336.10
SCREWS
108016
2983614
1325.6406
14.41
CAP SCREWS
108120
2988147
5913.6406
664.69
270333
3/24/2005
101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
20.00
CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
108231
1 -000020246
1470.6104
20.00
270334
3124/2005
101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
20.00
WORKSHOP REGISTRATION
107907
031405
1260.6104
20.00
270335
312412005
117407 LEXISNEXIS
110.00
BACKGROUND CHECKS
107958
0502250166
1400.6230
110.00
270336
312412005
1112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS
GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS
GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ENGINEERING GENERAL
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
3/23/2005 15:33:52
Page - 16
Business Unit
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
ANIMAL CONTROL
2,200.80
107873
774003
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
CITY OF EDINA
24.80
R55CKREG LOG20000
774004
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
2,357.50
108320
773787
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
Council Check Register
108321
773789
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
.05
3/24/2005 -3/24/2005
773786
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
896.24
108324
107865
175705 5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
131.98
755.88
108069
176109 5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
270341
312412005
1,652.12
100870 MATRX
270337
3/24/2005
101741 M. SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS
INC.
108017
884372
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
15.00
WINE SPECTATOR
108121
543850 5822.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
884686
1470.6510
15.00
370.00
270338
3/24/2005
101648 MACA
270342
3/24/2005
100875 MCCAREN DESIGNS INC.
30.00
DUES- TIM HUNTER
107959
031105 1450.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
1,578.33
.PLANTS
30.00
30345
5620.6620
TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS
270339
3124/2005
PLANTS
100868 MARK VII SALES
30507
5620.6620
TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS
3/23/2005 15:33:52
Page - 16
Business Unit
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
ANIMAL CONTROL
2,200.80
107873
774003
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
24.80
107874
774004
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
2,357.50
108320
773787
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
24.80
108321
773789
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
.05
108322
773786
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
85.25
108323
773788
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
627.53
108324
776104
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
EDINBOROUGH PARK
EDINBOROUGH PARK
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
5,320.73
270340
3/24/2005
101030 MATHISON CO.
39.08
PAPER CHARCOAL WHITE
107960
592060 -0
5120.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
72.10
BRUSHES
107961
592462 -1
5120.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
20.80
CHAMOIS
107962
590792-0
5120.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
131.98
270341
312412005
100870 MATRX
244.00
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
108017
884372
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
126.00
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
108018
884686
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
370.00
270342
3/24/2005
100875 MCCAREN DESIGNS INC.
1,578.33
.PLANTS
108196
30345
5620.6620
TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS
607.05
PLANTS
108197
30507
5620.6620
TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS
2,185.38
270343
3/24/2005
101483 MENARDS
487.55
RATCHET, CABINETS
108019
7936
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
340.10
CHAIRS, VACUUM, CONDUIT
108122
7933
5422.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
94.72
RE -BAR, TROWEL
108232
8730
1646.6556
TOOLS
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
EDINBOROUGH PARK
EDINBOROUGH PARK
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
CITY OF EDINA
3/23/2005 15:33:52
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 17
3/24/2005
-3/2412005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
87.06
WIRE, KNEE PADS, HINGES
108233
8909
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
81.95
CLAMPS, VISE GRIPS
108234
8964
1301.6556
TOOLS
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
1,091.38
270344
3/24/2005
101987 MENARDS
36.85
TIMER, TOOLPOUCH
108198
64929
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
58.73
HEATER, SENSOR
108235
52909
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
81.91
CLEANER, BULBS
108236
66661
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
43.45
STRIPPER, BULBS
108237
65926
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
17.47
GROUT, BRUSH
108238
69323
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
238.41
270345
3/24/2005
100882 MERIT SUPPLY
216.20
DEGREASER, GLASS CLEANER
108020
66482
1553.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
472.86
TOWELS, TISSUE
108021
66481
1552.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
689.06
270346
3/24/2005
101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY
255.49
SOCCER NETS
108239
81332
1621.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES
255.49
270347
3124/2005
100885 METRO SALES INC
641.00
COPIER MAINTENANCE
107908
175311
5410.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
641.00
270348
3124/2005
100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME
275,767.36
SEWER SERVICE
107963
0000791976
5922.6302
SEWER SERVICE METRO
SEWER TREATMENT
275,767.36
270349
3/24/2005
104650 MICRO CENTER
33.61
TECH SUPPLIES
108298
848088
1554.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
40.44
TECH SUPPLIES
108298
848088
1495.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
INSPECTIONS
10.19-
CREDIT
108299
854578
1554.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
63.86
270350
3124/2005
100019 MIDWEST ART FAIRS
47.70
CONSIGNMENT SALES
107964
3795
5120.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
47.70
270351
3/24/2005
100692 MIDWEST COCA-COLA EAGAN
204.00
107866
83627163
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
204.00
3123/2005 15:33:52
Page - 18
Business Unit
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
DISTRIBUTION
DISTRIBUTION
DISTRIBUTION
SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD
DISTRIBUTION
1,530.00
LICENSING FEES (17)
107965
030905
1400.6104
CITY OF EDINA
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
R55CKREG LOG20000
270358 3/24/2005
101996 MINNESOTA TROPHIES & GIFTS
Council Check Register
110.44
PLAQUES
108023
103852
312412005
—3/24/2005
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor/ Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
270352
3/2412005
102873 MILLER, SUSAN
70.00
SPORTS TURF SEMINAR
108024
APRIL 6
59.64
CELL PHONE CHARGES
108180
031805
1600.6188
TELEPHONE
59.64
270360 3/24/2005
100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC.
270353
3/24/2005
103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT
TORO WORKMAN VEHICLE
108123
450403 -00
5400.1740
MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT
GOLF BALANCE SHEET
13,322.96
431- 0005.300
107966
031005
5913.6601
WATER PURCHASED
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
2.74
13,322.96
108125
452015 -00
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
270354
3/24/2005
108126
100913 MINNEAPOLIS SUBURBAN SEWER
&W
REPAIR PARTS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
240.00-
CREDIT ON ACCT
108127
1,020.00
WATER SERVICE REPAIR
107909
32634
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
1,020.00
WATER SERVICE REPAIR
107910
32637
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
2,040.00
270355
3/24/2005
102137 MINNESOTA ELECTRICAL ASSOCIATI
275.00
DUES - DAN MCMAHON
108022
12456 -2005
1280.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
275.00
270356
3/24/2005
101376 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT
117.75
PIGGY -BACK NUTS
107911
0162795
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
117.75
270357
3/24/2005
100231 MINNESOTA POST BOARD
3123/2005 15:33:52
Page - 18
Business Unit
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
DISTRIBUTION
DISTRIBUTION
DISTRIBUTION
SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD
DISTRIBUTION
1,530.00
LICENSING FEES (17)
107965
030905
1400.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
1,530.00
270358 3/24/2005
101996 MINNESOTA TROPHIES & GIFTS
110.44
PLAQUES
108023
103852
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
110.44
270359 3124/2005
105921 MSTMA
70.00
SPORTS TURF SEMINAR
108024
APRIL 6
1642.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
FIELD MAINTENANCE
70.00
270360 3/24/2005
100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC.
15,774.63
TORO WORKMAN VEHICLE
108123
450403 -00
5400.1740
MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT
GOLF BALANCE SHEET
441.91
BELTS, PULLEYS, FILTERS
108124
451944 -00
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
2.74
CAP WASHER
108125
452015 -00
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
19.34
GREENSMOWER PARTS
108126
450633 -00
5422.6530
REPAIR PARTS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
240.00-
CREDIT ON ACCT
108127
022505
1640.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL
15,998.62
R55CKREG LOG20000
107968
909583317 -039
CITY OF EDINA
TELEPHONE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
237.03
108199
425483229022
Council Check
Register
EDINBOROUGH PARK
880.18
3/24/2005
—3/24/2005
270369 3/24/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
270361
3124/2005
1400.6203
118008 MU PERFORMING ARTS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
39.99
500.00
PARADE ENTERTAINMENT
108181
031805
1627.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
500.00
298.00
MEDIA INSTRUCTOR
108282
031705
5125.6103
270362
3/24/2005
298.00
101108 NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE
270371 3/24/2005
113.95
FILTER SET, DEVELOPER
107967
0302501VRXJ
5110.6564
CRAFT SUPPLIES
113.95
270363
3/2412005
103267 NATIONAL GOLF FOUNDATION
225.00
DUES
108025
1032214 - 2005
5410.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
225.00
270364
3/2412005
100012 NATIONAL WATERWORKS INC.
332.62
SEWER PIPE
107912
2133306
5923.6530
REPAIR PARTS
332.62
270365
3/2412005
106334 NELSON, PEGGY
411.00
MEDIA INSTRUCTOR
108261
031705
5125.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
411.00
270366
3/2412005
100922 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS
1,062.34
SIGN BLADES
108026
TI- 0137689
1325.6531
SIGNS & POSTS
1,062.34
270367
3/24/2005
103632 NEXT DAY GOURMET /SUPERIOR PROD
510.86
PIZZA OVENS
108036
6330429
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
510.86
270368
3124/2005
104672 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
3/23/2005 15:33:52
Page - 19
Business Unit
SPECIAL ACTIVITIES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
COLLECTION SYSTEMS
MEDIA STUDIO
STREET NAME SIGNS
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
643.15
107968
909583317 -039
1400.6188
TELEPHONE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
237.03
108199
425483229022
5620.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
EDINBOROUGH PARK
880.18
270369 3/24/2005
101359 NIBBE, MICHAEL
39.99
UNIFORM EXPENSE
107969
031505
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
39.99
270370 3/24/2005
101958 NICOL, JANET
298.00
MEDIA INSTRUCTOR
108282
031705
5125.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
MEDIA STUDIO
298.00
270371 3/24/2005
101729 NORMAN, POLLY
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
3/24/2005 --3124/2605
Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
60.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 108283 031705 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES
5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES
3123/2005 15:33:52
Page - 20
Business Unit
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
1553.6583 TIRES S& TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1553.6180. CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
1495.6103
5110.6103
14.63
TYPEWRITER RIBBON, PAPER
60.00
278915874- 001
5410.6513
270372
3124/2005
100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY
270378 3/24/2005
100936 OLSEN COMPANIES
21.24
FLEXWAX, RUBBER LATEX
107970
31055300
400.00
RIGGING SEMINAR
14.58
CANVAS TACKS
107971
30990101
388.73
SAWZALL COMBO KIT
35.82
327409
1646.6556
270373
3/24/2005
108241
100930 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO.
5913.6406
406.59
SPANNER BELTS
596.42
TIRES, SERVICE
108027
NW -94582
2,298.20
CHAIN SLINGS
119.90
SCRAP TIRE DISPOSAL
108028
NW -94719
240.56
CHAINS & HOOKS
103.49
SERVICE
108029
NW -94689
630.92-
CREDIT
819.81
327665
1553.6556
270374
3/24/2005
102557 NTOA
270379 3/24/2005
105738 ORIENTAL ART SUPPLY
1,180.00
TRAINING COURSES
107972
031405
509.13
ART SUPPLIES
1,180.00
9974
5120.5510
270375
3/24/2005
116114 OCE
140.00
MARCH MAINTENANCE
107913
984796219
140.00
270376
3/24/2005
100729 ODLAND, DOROTHY
480.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
108284
031705
-
480.00
270377
3/24/2005
103578 OFFICE DEPOT
5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES
5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES
3123/2005 15:33:52
Page - 20
Business Unit
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
1553.6583 TIRES S& TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1553.6180. CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
1495.6103
5110.6103
14.63
TYPEWRITER RIBBON, PAPER
108030
278915874- 001
5410.6513
14.63
270378 3/24/2005
100936 OLSEN COMPANIES
400.00
RIGGING SEMINAR
108128
327519
1281.6104
388.73
SAWZALL COMBO KIT
108240
327409
1646.6556
58.42
HANDLE, PRY BAR
108241
327655
5913.6406
406.59
SPANNER BELTS
108242
326652
1470.6406
2,298.20
CHAIN SLINGS
108243
327553
1553.6556
240.56
CHAINS & HOOKS
108244
327611
1553.6556
630.92-
CREDIT
108245
327665
1553.6556
3,161.58
270379 3/24/2005
105738 ORIENTAL ART SUPPLY
509.13
ART SUPPLIES
107973
9974
5120.5510
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
TOOLS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
TOOLS
TOOLS
TOOLS
TRAINING
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
DISTRIBUTION
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
3/2412005 —3/24/2005
Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
509.13
270380 3/24/2005 100247 ORLANDI STATUARY CO. INC.
39.20 EGYPTIAN MASK 107974 02417097 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
39.20
270381 3/2412005 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC.
3/23/2005 15:33:52
Page - 21
Business Unit
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
1,035.00
MONITOR INSTALLATION
108246
82707
5210.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
1,035.00
270382
3/2412005
117993 P & H SERVICES
120.05
SQUAD RADAR REPAIR
107975
10707
1400.6215
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
120.05
270383
3/24/2005
102440 PASS, GRACE
816.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
108285
031705
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
816.00
270384
3124/2005
115083 PATTINSON, WALT
210.00
MEDIA INSTRUCTOR
108286
031705
5125.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
MEDIA STUDIO
210.00
270385
3/24/2005
100347 PAUSTIS & SONS
1,327.82
108070
8064011 -IN
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,490.31
108071
8064010 -IN
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
1,557.80
108072
8064009 -IN
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
61.94-
108073
8063678 -CM
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
4,313.99
270386
3/24/2005
110832 PC2 SOLUTIONS, INC.
1,190.00
TECH SUPPORT
108247
22605003
1554.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
1,190.00
270387
3/24/2005
100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY
118.00
108074
72718819
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
62.55
108075
72718820
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
323.65
108129
76554715
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
504.20
270388
312412005
117825 PFEIFFER, LISA
540.00
MODEL
108287
031705
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
540.00
Subledger Account Description Business Unit
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
3/23/2005 15:33:52
Page - 22
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT
AUTOMOBILES & TRUCKS UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS
CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
CITY OF
EDINA
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
3124/2005
-3/24/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
270389
3/24/2005
100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
211,25
107867
2174469
5862.5512
1,094.25
108159
2176983
5862.5513
-
2,473.95
108160
2176984
5862.5513
1,024.05
108161
2176985
5862.5513
26.90-
108162
3314818
5862.5513
100.45-
108163
3314817
5842.5512
202.50
108325
2176982
5862.5512
933.45
108326
2176977
5842.5512
67.45
108327
2176974
5822.5512
539.05
108328
2176976
5822.5513
504.05
108329
2176975
5822.5513
6,922.65
270390
3/24/2005
105875 PICKERMAN'S SOUP AND SANDWICHE
238.83
SONIA'S SNACKS
107976
581
5111.5510
238.83
270391
3/24/2005
111340 POLAR CHEVROLET
14,427.58
SILVERADO PICKUP
108130
52265490
5900.1735
14,427.58
270392
3/24/2005
100961 POSTMASTER
5,045.00
ABOUT TOWN POSTAGE
108248
031805
2210.6123
5,045.00
270393
3/24/2005
101811 PREMIER FLEET SERVICES
1,813.40
PLOW TRUCK REPAIRS
107914
18105
1553.6180
1,813.40
270394
3/24/2005
104424 PRIEDE, SOREN
144.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
108288
031705
5110.6103
144.00
270395
3/24/2005
100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY
326.20
108076
205071
5822.5513
1,143.26
108077
205074
5842.5513
2,908.57
108078
205068
5862.5513
148.40
108079
203773
5862.5513
17.06-
108080
662432
5842.5513
4,509.37
Subledger Account Description Business Unit
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
3/23/2005 15:33:52
Page - 22
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT
AUTOMOBILES & TRUCKS UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS
CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation
270396 312412005 106341 PRIORITY DISPATCH
78.00 RENEWAL 2005
78.00
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
3124/2005 -3/24/2005
PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
107977 C7742 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
3/23/2005 15:33:52
Page - 23
Business Unit
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
270397 312412005
106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY
588.06
DOOR MATS
108200
3508
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
466.21
TISSUE, ROLL TOWELS
108201
3506
5620.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
1,054.27
270398 3/24/2005
101744 QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS
69.73
TEMPERATURE SENSORS
108249
15216
1646.6530
REPAIR PARTS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
69.73
270400 312412005
100971 QUALITY WINE
4.66-
108081
527379 -00
5840.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
468.91
108081
527379 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
12.59-
108082
527378 -00
5840.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
1,277.57
108082
527378 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
65.76-
108083
527643 -00
5840.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
3,311.26
108083
527643 -00
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
2.39-
108084
527508 -00
5840.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
120.58
108084
527508 -00
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
1.47-
108085
527350 -00
5820.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
50TH STREET GENERAL
149.78
108085
527350 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
7.18-
108086
526920 -00
5820.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
50TH STREET GENERAL
727.47
108086
526920 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
13.32-
108087
527631 -00
5820.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
50TH STREET GENERAL
676.67
108087
527631 -00
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
50.48-
108088
527393 -00
5860.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
5,091.84
108088
527393 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
9.00-
108089
525842 -00
5860.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
909.70
108089
525842 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
7.47-
108090
527391 -00
5860.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
760.00
108090
527391 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
200.92-
108091
524732 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
48.92-
108092
523628 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
33.05-
108330
527630 -00
5860.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
1,667.29
108330
527630 -00
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
14,703.86
270401 3124/2005
101965 QWEST
CITY OF EDINA
3/23/2005 15:33:52
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 24
3/24/2005
—3/24/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
99.43
952 451 -6058
108131
6058 -3/05
1400.6188
TELEPHONE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
99.43
270402
312412005
118002 REA CREATIONS .
235.14
MERCHANDISE
108132
2744
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS -.PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
235.14
270403
3124/2005
102986 RECYCOOL
115.50
RECYCLE ANTIFREEZE
108250
3503161
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
115.50 .
270404
3/24/2005
100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY
117.00
PLUMBING REPAIRS
108251
38889
5210.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
117.00
270405
3/24/2005
100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO.
269.27
SOFTENER SALT
108133
00160722
5421.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GRILL
269.27
270406
312412005
118009 ROBERT ENGSTROM CO.
75.42
WATER PAYMENT REFUND
108202
031805
5900.1211.1
ACCTS RECEIVABLE MANUAL
UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
75.42
270407
3/24/2005
118001 ROZEBOOM MILLER ARCHITECTS INC
25,230.00
ARCHITECT /ENGINEERING SERVICES
108134
1
1500.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CONTINGENCIES
25,230.00
270408
312412005
101963 S & S TREE AND HORTICULTURAL
S
2,499.99
CONTRACT TREE PRUNING
107978
50770
1644.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
TREES & MAINTENANCE
2,499.99
270409
3/24/2005
100987 SA -AG INC
158.58
FILL SAND
108031
41739
1318.6517
SAND GRAVEL & ROCK
SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
166.14
FILL SAND
108032
41740
1318.6517
SAND GRAVEL & ROCK
SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
599.62
ICE CONTROL SAND
108033
41815
1318.6517
SAND GRAVEL & ROCK
SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
924.34
270410
312412005
100988 SAFETY KLEEN
105.44
PARTS WASHER CHANGE OUT
108252
MB01296429
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
105.44
270411
3124/2005
117807 SAM'S CLUB
CITY OF EDINA
3/23/2005 15:33:52
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 25
3/24/2005
-3/24/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
tnv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
93.04
ACCT 7715090304872906
107915
030705
7411.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PSTF OCCUPANCY
93.04
270412
3124/2005
101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT
14.53
SUPPLIES
108135
031005
1624.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PLAYGROUND & THEATER
14.53
270413
3/24/2005
104788 SANDY'S PROMOTIONAL STUFF
175.06
T- SHIRTS
107916
SH5031
2210.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COMMUNICATIONS
175.06
270414
3/24/2005
102949 SECURITAS SECURITY SYSTEMS USA
1,115.06
SERVICE CONTRACT
108203
2060498 -IN
5620.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
EDINBOROUGH PARK
47.93
BATTERY
108204
2060151 -IN
5630.6530
REPAIR PARTS
CENTENNIAL LAKES
1,162.99
270415
3124/2005
117994 SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES
75.00
BUS RENTAL
107979
031405
1400.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
75.00
270416
312412005
100998 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO.
165.56
PAINT, TAPE
107917
4623-4
5912.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDINGS
165.56
270417
3124/2005
101585 SHORT, MICHAEL
227.77
EQUIPT REIMBURSEMENT
107980
031505
1400.6160
DATA PROCESSING
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
227.77
270418
3/24/2005
102871 SILVERS, ROXANNE
108.00
MODEL
108289
031705
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
108.00
270419
312412005
101275 SJS CORP - CUSTOMIPSC SUPPLY
207.52
DE -ICER
108034
6093
1647.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PATHS & HARD SURFACE
207.52
270420
3/2412005
118014 SMITH, GLORIA
552.50
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
108290
031705
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
552.50
270421
3124/2005
106403 SOUND CLIPS INC.
50.00
NEWS FOOTAGE VIDEO
107918
28982
2210.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COMMUNICATIONS
CITY OF EDINA
3/23/2005 15:33:52
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 26
3/24/2005
—3/24/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
50.00
270422
3/24/2005
101002 SOUTH SIDE DISTRIBUTORS INC
52.60
108093
161971
5842.5515
COST OF. GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
1,884.25
108094
161970
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
911,75
108095
161967
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
2,848.60
270423
3/2412005
118006 SOVIS, MARY JANE
19.00
PROGRAM REFUND
108182
031805
1628.4392.09
SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS
SENIOR CITIZENS
19.00
270424
312412005
110977 SOW, ADAMA
908.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
108291
031705
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
1,010.00
CLEANING
108291
031705
5111.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT
1,918.00
270425
3/24/2005
116682 SPECIALTY WINE & BEVERAGES
74.00
108096
2182
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
74.00
270426
3/24/2005
104709 SPORT SUPPLY GROUP INC.
243.87
MEGAPHONE, SWINGS
108205
91646568
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
243.87
270427
3/2412005
103411 SPORTSIGN
360.00
INTERPRETER
108183
05021
4078.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
INCLUSION PROGRAM
360.00
270428
3/24/2005
103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC
183.82
COUPLINGS
108253
S136409
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
183.82
270429
3/24/2005
100650 STANLEY SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC
90.06
CABLE PADLOCKS
108206
MN- 364714
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
90.06
270430
3/2412005
101009 STATE TREASURER
20.00
GB CERTIFICATION
107919
031405
1495.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
INSPECTIONS
20.00
270431
3124/2005
106452 STONE, HOLLY
R55CKREG LOG20000
598.29
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
3/2412005
101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
3/24/2005 -3/24/2005
Check # Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
107921
341.00
INSTRUCTOR AC 108292
031705 5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
341.00
REPAIRS
107922
CVCB478421
270432 3/2412005
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
102390 STRAND MANUFACTURING CO INC
35.53
CABLE
32.48
CONTRACTED SERVICE 107920
25365 5915.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
32.48
17.60
KEYS CUT
108254
270433 3/24/2005
1553.6530
101015 STREICHERS
3/23/2005 15:33:52
Page - 27
Business Unit
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
WATER TREATMENT
298.09 SQUAD SPOTLIGHTS 107981 1253447 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
300.20 SQUAD REPAIR 108136 1253379 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
DISTRIBUTION
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1,657.40 107868 365429 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
68.75 107869 365428 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING
598.29
270434
3/2412005
101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
400.05
REPAIRS
107921
CTCB478677
1553.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
609.40
REPAIRS
107922
CVCB478421
1553.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
35.53
CABLE
108035
382703CVW
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
17.60
KEYS CUT
108254
383658CVW
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
1,062.58
270435
3/24/2005
101019 SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY
1,500.00
MEMBERSHIP
108137
031705
1506.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1,500.00
270436
312412005
105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC.
440.17
TIRES
108138
10034410
1553.6583
TIRES 8 TUBES
440.17
270437
3124/2005
101171 SUPERIOR SHORES CONFERENCE CEN
1,146.43
CONFERENCE CHARGES
108293
031705
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1,146.43
270438
3/24/2005
110674 SUPERIOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIO
30.93
PHONE CASE
107923
8887
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30.93
270439
3/24/2005
101326 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO
190.04
TERMINALS, CLAMPS
108037
18366 -00
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
190.04
270440
312412005
101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
DISTRIBUTION
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1,657.40 107868 365429 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
68.75 107869 365428 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING
RSSCKREG LOG20000 CITY.OF EDINA 3123/2005 15:33:52
Council Check Register Page - 28
3/24/2005 -- 3/24/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
87.50
108331
366136
5862.5515.
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
1,382.43
108332
366137
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
138.60
108333
365830
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
3,534.68
270441
3/24/2005
103331 TILSNER, DONNA
5.65
SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT
108038
031405
1629.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ADAPTIVE RECREATION
82.62
SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT
108038
031405
1624.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PLAYGROUND & THEATER
88.27
270442
312412005
101038 TOLL GAS 8 WELDING SUPPLY
23.29
WELDING SUPPLIES
108207
468700
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
23.29
270443
3124/2005
118003 TOMMY BAHAMA
_
260.14
MERCHANDISE
108139
8197951,
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
260.14
270444
3124/2005
117992 TOSHIBA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS
117.61
SCANNER ROLLER KIT
107982
ARIN035973
1400.6215
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
105.00
SCANNER MAINTENANCE
107983
SDIN027589
1400.6215
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
222.61
270445
3/24/2005.
101039 TOTAL TOOL
90.22
SPLICE COVERS
108039
7104436
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
90.22
270446
312412005
116438 TWIN CRIES WELLNESS
165.00
AD
108255
PO 9071
5110.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
165.00
270447
3/24/2005
101460 TWIN CITIES WRECKER SALES INC
62.39
STRAP ASSEMBLY
108256
195879
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
62.39
270448
3/2412005
101047 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO
438.67
REPAIRS
107924
233420
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
438.67
270449
3124/2005
101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE
101.23
DOOR HARDWARE
108040
104027
1646.6530
REPAIR PARTS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
101.23
R55CKREG LOG20000
520.00
CITY OF EDINA
108258
177613,176801,1
1550.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
Council Check Register
77612
3/24/2005
3/24/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor/ Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
270450
312412005
105781 UNO DOS TRES COMMUNICATIONS
103981 TWIN CITY OFFICE SUPPLY INC.
384.12
OFFICE SUPPLIES
108257
456161-0
5110.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT, GENERAL
384.12
100.00
270451
3/24/2005
270457
115379 U.S. BANK
103298 UPS STORE #1715, THE
59.62
ACRONIS IMAGE 8.0
107986
MAR42005
1554.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
280
1552.6406
59.62
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
8.72
270452
3124/2005
101051 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
270458
3124/2005
114236 USA BLUE BOOK
564.99
107984
022805
1400.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
29.12
HYDRANT OIL
1,925.37
942983
107984
022805
1419.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
29.12
4,200.79
107984
022805
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
270459
3/24/2005
6,691.15
101058 VAN PAPER CO.
270453
3/24/2005
104223 UNITED PROPERTIES INVESTMENT 1
BAGS, PLATES, TOWELS
107926
572941
5842.6512
PAPER SUPPLIES
YORK SELLING
487,748.59
TIF ASSISTANCE PAY 2004
108184
031705
1000.1303
DUE FROM HRA
487,748.59
270454
3/24/2005
100371 UNITED RENTALS
767.96
SKYJACK RENTAL
108208
46294452 -001
5620.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
767.96
270455
3124/2005
101055 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
3123/2005 15:33:52
Page - 29
Business Unit
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
RESERVE PROGRAM
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
EDINBOROUGH PARK
520.00
WORKSHOP REGISTRATION
108258
177613,176801,1
1550.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
77612
520.00
270456
3124/2005
105781 UNO DOS TRES COMMUNICATIONS
100.00
INTERPRETER
107985
2526
1400.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
POLICE DEPT, GENERAL
100.00
270457
3/24/2005
103298 UPS STORE #1715, THE
8.72
MAIL SERVICE
107925
280
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
8.72
270458
3124/2005
114236 USA BLUE BOOK
29.12
HYDRANT OIL
108041
942983
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
29.12
270459
3/24/2005
101058 VAN PAPER CO.
395.36
BAGS, PLATES, TOWELS
107926
572941
5842.6512
PAPER SUPPLIES
YORK SELLING
SALE OF WATER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
3123/2005 15:33:52
Page - 30
Business Unit
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
50TH STREET GENERAL
50TH ST SELLING
UTILITY REVENUES
STREET REVOLVING
ADVERTISING OTHER
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
1,696.19
CITY OF EDINA
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
R55CKREG LOG20000
270460
3/24/2005
102734 VEIT & COMPANY INC
Council Check Register
500.00
HYDRANT RENTAL REFUND
3/24/2005 - 3/24/2005.
031705
Check # Date Amount
Vendor / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
557.79
BAGS, TOWELS
107927
572892 5862.6512
PAPER SUPPLIES
13.25
GLOVES
107928
572893 5862.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
203.42
TISSUE
107929
572471 1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
41.25
BAGS, KLEENEX
108259
572942,573217 5820.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
485.12
BAGS, KLEENEX
108259
572942,573217 5822.6512
PAPER SUPPLIES
SALE OF WATER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
3123/2005 15:33:52
Page - 30
Business Unit
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
50TH STREET GENERAL
50TH ST SELLING
UTILITY REVENUES
STREET REVOLVING
ADVERTISING OTHER
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
1,696.19
YORK SELLING
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
COLLECTION SYSTEMS
270460
3/24/2005
102734 VEIT & COMPANY INC
500.00
HYDRANT RENTAL REFUND
108260
031705
5901.4626
500.00
270461
3/2412005
116104 VERDICON INC.
419.93
DE -ICER
108042
S002502446.001
4090.6406
419.93
270462
3/24/2005
101610 VERIZON DIRECTORIES CORP.
90.75
DIRECTORY AD
107987
FINAL
5110.6122
90.75
270463
3/24/2005
102218 VINTAGE ONE WINES
39.90
.108097
9391
5842.5513
39.90
270464
3124/2005
101953 VISU -SEWER CLEAN & SEAL INC
4,207.74
SANITARY SEWER INSPECTION
107930
17617 -1
5923.6136
4,207.74
270465
3/24/2005
104820 VOELKER, JAMES .
45.88
UNIFORM PURCHASE
108261
031805
1553.6201
45.88
270466
3124/2005
101069 VOSS LIGHTING
120.35
LIGHTING
107931
15009120 -00
5840.6406
138.18
LIGHTING
107931
15009120 -00
1470.6406
302.25
LIGHTING
107931
.15009120 -00
1375.6406
560.78
270467
3/24/2005
103466 WASTE MANAGEMENT - SAVAGE
MN
2,952.32
REFUSE
107988
3011783
4095.6103
3,147.23
REFUSE
107989
3012883
4095.6103
37.80
108141
3011789
5821.6182
40.30
108141
3011789
1481.6182
SALE OF WATER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
3123/2005 15:33:52
Page - 30
Business Unit
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
50TH STREET GENERAL
50TH ST SELLING
UTILITY REVENUES
STREET REVOLVING
ADVERTISING OTHER
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
COLLECTION SYSTEMS
LAUNDRY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
RUBBISH REMOVAL
.RUBBISH REMOVAL
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
PARKING RAMP
50TH STREET RUBBISH
50TH STREET RUBBISH
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
YORK FIRE STATION
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor/ Explanation
Council Check Register
031805
41.52
3/24/2005
3/24/2005
111602 -00
41.52
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
70.52
3011789
5210.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
76.62
3011789
5111.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
79.45
3011789
1470.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
82.64
3011789
5861.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
97.52
3011789
5422.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
173.59
3011789
5841.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
179.55
3011789
1628.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
239.29
3011789
5420.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
305.71
3011789
1551.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
305.71
3011789
5511.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
490.51
3011789
1301.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
8,361.80
3011789
270468
3/2412005
108141
101685 WEEKEND FREEDOM
5620.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
574.04
SNOWBLOWER
574.04
270469
3/2412005
115655 WEINAND, JILL
180.00
ADAPTIVE STAFF
180.00
270470
3/24/2005
102342 WENZEL, KENNETH
480.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
480.00
270471
312412005
101078 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT
159.75
BLACK FLEET KEYS
116.09
ROTARY PUMP
275.84
270472
3/24/2005
101033 WINE COMPANY, THE
822.35
108209
CITY OF EDINA
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
Council Check Register
031805
1629.6103
3/24/2005
3/24/2005
111602 -00
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
108141
3011789
5210.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
108141
3011789
5111.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
108141
3011789
1470.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
108141
3011789
5861.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
108141
3011789
5422.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
108141
3011789
5841.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
108141
3011789
1628.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
108141
3011789
5420.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
108141
3011789
1551.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
108141
3011789
5511.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
108141
3011789
1301.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
108141
3011789
1552.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
108141
3011789
5620.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
108209
113099
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
108185
031805
1629.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
108294 031705 5110.6103
107932
0027737 -IN
1552.6530
108043
0027753 -IN
1301.6556
108098
111602 -00
5842.5513
108099
111481 -00
5822.5513
108100
111600 -00
5862.5513
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
REPAIR PARTS
TOOLS
3/2312005 15:33:52
Page - 31
Business Unit
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
VERNON OCCUPANCY
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
YORK OCCUPANCY
SENIOR CITIZENS
CLUBHOUSE
CITY HALL GENERAL
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
EDINBOROUGH PARK
EDINBOROUGH PARK
ADAPTIVE RECREATION
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
270473 3/24/2005 101312 WINE MERCHANTS
770.55 108164 119784 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
14.17- 108165 23731 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
8,75- 108166 23711 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
CITY OF EDINA
3123/2005 15:33:52
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 32
3/24/2005
-3/24/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
23.44-
108167
23712
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
12.33-
108168
23746
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
312.41
108334
119782
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
1,024.27
270474
3/24/2005
100591 WITTSTRUCK, MARTHA
288.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
108295
031705
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
288.00
270475
3124/2005
101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC
600.00
108101
162303
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,212.50
108169
162373
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
606.25
108170
162372
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
193.00
108335
162427
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
2,611.75
270476
3/24/2005
101726 XCEL ENERGY
12.99
107933
19258810
1646.6185
LIGHT & POWER
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
3,833.64
107934
19570142
1375.6185
LIGHT & POWER
PARKING RAMP
3,204.47
107935
19554903
1552.6185
LIGHT & POWER
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
2,123.01
108044
19883218
1646.6185
LIGHT & POWER
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
591.46
108045
19429213
5821.6185
LIGHT & POWER
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
855.71
108045
19429213
5861.6185
LIGHT & POWER
VERNON OCCUPANCY
10,621.28
270477
3/24/2005
100568 XEROX CORPORATION
325.55
FEB USAGE
107990
008352890
1400.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL'
113.67
FEB USAGE
107991
008552771
5110.6151
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
439.22
270478
3/24/2005
117995 YANG YANG
32.44
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
108046
031005
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
32.44
270479
312412005
101091 ZIEGLER INC
84.28
TUBE KIT
108142
PC000779615
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
84.28
270480
3/24/2005
101531 ZINN, BOBO
130.00
REIMBURSE
108296
031705
5110.6564
CRAFT SUPPLIES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
468.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
108296
031705
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
598.00
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/23/2005 15:33:52
Council Check Register Page - 33
3/24/2005 —3124/2005
Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation
1,652,942.25 Grand Total
PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
Payment Instrument Totals
Check Total 1,652,942.25
Total Payments 1,652,942.25
Business Unit
R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Summary
3/2412005 - 3/2412005
Company
Amount
01000 GENERAL FUND
1,025,049.07
02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND
7,404.54
04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND
121,936.95
05100 ART CENTER FUND
24,916.74
05200 GOLF DOME FUND
1,193.52
05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND
199.41
05400 GOLF COURSE FUND
31,424.25
05500 ICE ARENA FUND
361.89
05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND
8,599.29
05800 LIQUOR FUND
114,796.71
05900 UTILITY FUND
316,966.84
07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND
93.04
Report Totals
1,652,942.25
We confirm to the best of our knowledge
and belief, that these claims
comply in all material respects
with the requirements of the City
of Edina purchasing olicies and
procedures - t� 0
Finance
City Manager
3/23/2005 15:40:19
Page - 1
CITY OF EDINA
3/30/2005 10:51:09
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 1
3/25/2005
- 3/31/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
270481
3125/2005
101976 DRIVER & VEHICLE SERVICES
1,169.05
REGISTRATION /LICENSING
108499
032405
1400.6260
LICENSES & PERMITS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
1,169.05
270482
3/3112005
105696 3CMA
350.00
JENNIFER BENNEROTTE
108558
2005DUES
2210.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
COMMUNICATIONS
350.00
270483
313112005
100612 A.M. LEONARD
344.64
HORTICULTURAL SUPPLIES
108599
020351740101
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
344.64
270484
313112005
100613 AAA
9.50
LICENSE TABS FOR 26.191
108340
032205
1553.6260
LICENSES & PERMITS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
9.50
270485
3/31/2005
102971 ACE ICE COMPANY
42,12
108500
452467
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
34.12
108501
452468
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
57.24
108502
452471
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
133.48
270486
3/31/2005
100616 ACTION MAILING SERVICES INC.
429.62
MAIL PROCESSING
108559
102988
5910.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
GENERAL (BILLING)
429.62
270487
3131/2005
105162 - ADT SECURITY SERVICES
774.81
ALARM SERVICE
108389
91479622
5420.6250
ALARM SERVICE
CLUB HOUSE
25.02
ALARM SERVICE
108457
91480016
5111.6250
ALARM SERVICE
ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT
799.83
270488
313112005
118019 ADVANCED LIGHTING
810.00
FLASHLIGHTS
108341
23651
1480.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
SPECIAL OPERATIONS
810.00
270489
3/3112005
118049 AIRSHORE INTERNATIONAL
38.82
REPAIR KNOB
108683
AAA12695
1470.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
38.82
270490
3131/2005
101077 AIRTEC INC.
81.78
CLAMPS, WELDING WIRE
108600
295285
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
81.78
CITY OF EDINA
3130/2005 10:51:09
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 2
3/25/2005
- 3/31/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
270491
313112005
100575 ALL SAFE FIRE & SECURITY
176.18
EXTINGUISHER CERTIFICATION
108560
64984
1400.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
34.50
EXTINGUISHER CERTIFICATION
108561
64983
1551.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
CITY HALL GENERAL
438.23
EXTINGUISHER CERTIFICATION
108601
64978
5410.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
648.91
270492
313112005
112033 ALLDATA
1,500.00
ONLINE DATA SUBSCRIPTION
108342
FW270363 -2005
1553.6160
DATA PROCESSING
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1,500.00
270493
313112005
118017 ALLINA MEDICAL CLINIC
270.00
ROOM RENTAL REFUND
108343
032105
1600.4722.03
ARNESON ACRES RENTAL
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
270.00
270494
313112005
103357 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO
104.37
LAV MIC HEAD
108344
INV59992
2210.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COMMUNICATIONS
104.37
270495
313112005
100624 ALTERNATOR REBUILD CO.
153.36
ALTERNATOR
108562
37237
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
153.36
270496
313112005
118021 AMERICAN BEVERAGE LICENSEES
250.00
CONVENTION REGISTRATION
108458
8
5840.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
250.00
270497
3/31/2005
100630 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC.
35.79
COMPUTER PAPER
108684
158085301
5820.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
50TH STREET GENERAL
71.58
COMPUTER PAPER
108684
158085301
5860.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
107.38
COMPUTER PAPER
108684
158085301
5840.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
214.75
270498
313112005
101874 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC.
56.98
RADIO REPAIR
108685
40480
1470.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
88.40
PAGER BATTERIES
108686
40460
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
145.38
270499
313112005
102109 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER
22.81
RADIO REPAIRS
108687
0000063102
1470.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
22.81
CITY OF EDINA
3/30/2005 10:51:09
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 3
3/25/2005
- 3/31/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
270500
3/3112005
102646 AQUA LOGIC INC.
260.02
DE, ACID, CHLORINE
108602
26479
5620.6545
CHEMICALS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
260.02
270501
3/31/2005
103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS
131.95
COFFEE
108688
6013 -458788
7411.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PSTF OCCUPANCY
131.95
270502
3131/2005
101977 ARCH WIRELESS
73.48
PAGER RENTAL
108689
A6339611C
1470.6151
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
73.48
270503
313112005
100634 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO.
209.81
BACKRACK
108345
1058421
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
106.50
PRESSURE HOSE
108346
1057601
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
316.31
270504
3/31/2005
118024 BATES, JEREME
20.00
UNIFORM PURCHASE
108390
032205
5840.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
20.00
270505
3/31/2005
101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION
215.60
108424
32723400
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
204.90
108425
32723500
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
105.81
108426
39719100
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
97.11
108427
39719200
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
47.25
108428
32723600
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
1,061.00
108428
32723600
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
1,761.80
108429
32723700
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
23.00
108430
39719300
5860.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
106.42
108431
39719400
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
300.00
108503
32758100
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
374.90
108504
32723900
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
500.00
108648
32764000
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,280.80
108649
32723800
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
6,078.59
270506
3/3112005
101191 BENNEROTTE, JENNIFER
99.95
WEBSITE SOFTWARE
108690
10146759
2210.6124
WEB DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNICATIONS
99.95
270507
3/31/2005
118016 BERG, SARAH
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
3/25/2005
- 3131/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
49.82
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
108347
032105
2210.6107
49.82
270508
3131/2005
100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS
279.10
OFFICE SUPPLIES
108348
3723110
7411.6406
23.91
OFFICE SUPPLIES
108349
3756350
1260.6406
48.82
MARKER BOARD, PENS, GLUE
108563
3761430
1552.6406
44.86
OFFICE SUPPLIES
108564
3742610
1470.6513
124.54
OFFICE SUPPLIES
108565
3732180
1470.6513
23.08-
RETURN
108566
CM3732180
1470.6513
75.24-
RETURN
108567
CM3723110
7410.6406
422.91
270509
313112005
103832 BLACK & DECKER USPTG
27.41
CLAMPS, WRENCHES
108350
02072220
1553.6530
27.41
270510
3131/2005
100663 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
15.00
PETTY CASH
108604
032405
5410.6406
37.00
PETTY CASH
108604
032405
5410.6235
44.00
PETTY CASH
108604
032405
5401.4603
44.95
PETTY CASH
108604
032405
5410.6105
94.63
PETTY CASH
108604
032405
5210.6513
235.58
270511
313112005
101516 BRAEMAR PRINTING
258.40
RAIN CHECKS
108605
61005
5410.6575
258.40
270512
3131/2005
100667 BROCK WHITE COMPANY
6.16
HAND GRIPS
108351
11324196 -00
1301.6556
6.16
270513
3131/2005
102220 BROWDER STONE COMPANY
98.86
POLICE LANYARDS
108603
25530
1400.6406
98.86
270514
3/3112005
101241 BROWN TRAFFIC PRODUCTS
626.22
TEST EMITTER
108568
170952
1330.6215
626.22
270515
3131/2005
118041 BURLEY, BRYAN
3/30/2005 10:51:09
Page - 4
Subledger Account Description Business Unit
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PSTF OCCUPANCY
ENGINEERING GENERAL
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
PSTF ADMINISTRATION
REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION
POSTAGE GOLF ADMINISTRATION
COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF DOME PROGRAM
PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION
TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE
GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS
CITY OF EDINA
3/30/2005 10:51:09
R55CKREG
LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 5
3/25/2005
- 3/31/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
50.00
ROOM RENTAL REFUND
108606
032205
5401.4553
CLUBHOUSE
GOLF REVENUES
50.00
270516
313112005
106487 CALGREN, MARY C.
48.00
CLASS REFUND
108459
032205
5101.4607
CLASS REGISTRATION
ART CENTER REVENUES
48.00
270517
3/31/2005
102149 CALLAWAY GOLF
241.50
GOLF BALLS
108391
905500167
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
729.81
MERCHANDISE
108392
905449127
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
3,015.41
GOLF BALLS
108393
905375919
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
180.61-
2004 YEAREND REBATE
108723
905099367
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
3,806.11
270518
3/31/2005
108688 CANTON COMMUNICATIONS INC.
2,450.00
ADVERTISING
108394
050201 -1
5210.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
6,952.40
ADVERTISING
108395
050301A
5210.6122•
ADVERTISING OTHER
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
9,402.40
270519
313112005
103268 CARLSON, DAVID
308.32
UNIFORM PURCHASE
108460
032305
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
308.32
270520
3131/2005
112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO
2,021.92
108352
031605
7411.6186
HEAT
PSTF OCCUPANCY
65.41
108353
3/16
7411.6186
HEAT
PSTF OCCUPANCY
227,12
108396
MAR1605
5430.6186
HEAT
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
5,740.93
108569
032105
1551.6186
HEAT
CITY HALL GENERAL
9,72
108691
032205
7413.6582
FUEL OIL
PSTF FIRE TOWER
8,065.10
270521
3131/2005
101264 CHET'S SHOES INC.
53.25
ZIPPER KITS
108570
BK13558
1470.6558
DEPT UNIFORMS.
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
53.25
270522
3/3112005
118025 CITY OF NORTH ST PAUL
80.00
LABOR RELATIONS CONFERENCE
108397
032305
1120.6104
CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS
ADMINISTRATION
80.00
270523
3131/2005
100576 CITY OF WHITE BEAR LAKE
100.00
CLASS REGISTRATION
108461
032305
1400.6104
CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
100.00
CITY OF EDINA
3/30/2005 10:51:09
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 6
3/25/2005
- 3/31/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
270524
3/31/2005
111676 CLASSIC BRASS QUINTET
150.00
PERFORMANCE 4/10/05
108339
032205
5610.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
ED ADMINISTRATION
150.00
270525
3131/2005
117850 COMPLIANCE TRAINING SERVICES
17,569.00
AIR MONITORING SYSTEM
108398
401
1480.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
SPECIAL OPERATIONS
17,569.00
270526
313112005
102490 COMPUSA INC.
89.94
COMPUTER ITEMS
108462
401107776
5125.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MEDIA STUDIO
138.95
COMPUTER ITEMS
108462
401107776
5125.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
MEDIA STUDIO
35.01
COMPUTER ITEMS
108463
401107793
5125.6564
CRAFT SUPPLIES
MEDIA STUDIO
119.42
COMPUTER ITEMS
108463
401107793
5125.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
MEDIA STUDIO
383.32
270527
3/3112005
101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS
33.12
GLOVES, DUCT TAPE
108464
02532522
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
290.66
EARPLUGS, GLOVES
108571
02531934
1301.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
323.78
270528
3131/2005
100706 D.C. ANNIS SEWER INC.
453.00
PUMP SUMP
108692
43320
1470.6215
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
88.00
CLEAN DRAIN
108693
43278
1470.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
541.00
270529
3131/2005
118042 DANIELS, TIFFANY
42.00
PARTY RENTAL REFUND
108607
- 032505
5601.4554
EDINBOROUGH PARK
EB /CL REVENUES
42.00
270530
3/31/2005
102285 DAVANNIS
58.52
TRAINING MEALS
108465
152632-0
1400.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
58.52
270531
313112005
101805 DAVID A. KIRSCHT ASSOCIATES IN
700.00
ARCHITECT SERVICES
108399
2304X
5422.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
700.00
270532
3131/2005
102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING
362.00
108505
305624
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
567.35
108506
305990
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
1,426.55
108507
305911
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
CITY OF EDINA
3/30/2005 10:51:09
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 7
3/25/2005
- 3/31/2005
Check # Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
33.20
108508
305913
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
2,389.10
270533 3/31/2005
100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO.
14.61
TOOLS
108354
720895
1646.6556
TOOLS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
100.62
TOOLS
108355
732473
1646.6556
TOOLS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
115.23
270534 3131/2005
100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY
51.12
BAKERY
108608
186562
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
51.12
270535 3/3112005
102712 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
37.00
WAN USAGE JAN 2005
108400
DV05010285
1400.6204
TELETYPE SERVICE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
31.64
GREENHOUSE
108401
W05020592
1646.6188
TELEPHONE
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
47.46
ARNESON
108401
W05020592
1646.6188
TELEPHONE
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
49.17
HISTORICAL
108401
W05020592
1646.6188
TELEPHONE
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
63.41
108401
W05020592
5821.6188
TELEPHONE
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
71.47
108401
W05020592
5311.6188
TELEPHONE
POOL OPERATION
77.36
108401
W05020592
5210.6188
TELEPHONE
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
79.10
CARD ACCESS -PARKS
108401
W05020592
1646.6188
TELEPHONE
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
79.10
108401
W05020592
1550.6188
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
82.13
108401
W05020592
5861.6188
TELEPHONE
VERNON OCCUPANCY
95.53
108401
W05020592
1481.6188
TELEPHONE
YORK FIRE STATION
109.65
108401
W05020592
5111.6188
TELEPHONE
ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT
127.09
108401
W05020592
5841.6188
TELEPHONE
YORK OCCUPANCY
174.10
108401
W05020592
1622.6188
TELEPHONE
SKATING & HOCKEY
321.43
108401
W05020592
5610.6188
TELEPHONE
ED ADMINISTRATION
372.26
108609
W05020599
5420.6188
TELEPHONE
CLUB HOUSE
1,817.90
270536 313112005
100232 DESO
207.68
TABLE
108694
0007548 -IN
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
207.68
270537 3/31/2005
101691 DON BETZEN GOLF SUPPLY CO.
1,329.00
GOLF TEES
108610
18877
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
100.65
MERCHANDISE
108611
18856
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
1,429.65
270538 3/31/2005
100731 DPC INDUSTRIES
2,742.44
CHEMICALS
108572
82700281 -05
5915.6586
WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES
WATER TREATMENT
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/30/2005 10:51:09
Council Check Register Page - 8
3/25/2005 — 3/31/2005
Check #
Date
—
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
2,742.44
270539
3/31/2005
118023 DRAEGER, NICOLE
16.99
UNIFORM PURCHASE
108402
032205
5840.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
16.99
270540
3/31/2005
100732 DRUMMOND AMERICAN CORP.
146.05
OPEN & SHUT SPRAY
108573
3031513
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
146.05
270541
313112005
100739 EAGLE WINE
1,354.99
108509
208490
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
335.15
108510
208487
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
1,199.88
108511
208481
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
5.53-
108512
662645
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
2,884.49
270542
3/31/2005
100741 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
2,169.35
108513
325448
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
•
3,622.50
108650
325476
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
5,791.85
270543
3/31/2005
118032 ECOWATER SYSTEMS OF HOPKINS
12.00
PERMIT REFUND
108574
ED032179
1495.4112
PLUMBING PERMITS
INSPECTIONS
12.00
270544
3/31/2005
100744 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
103.00
EASTER EGG SCRAMBLE REVENUES
108612
032505
5601.4541
GENERAL ADMISSIONS
EB /CL REVENUES
103.00
270545
3/31/2005
101630 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS .
144.00
GYM TIME FEE
108466
4461
4077.6102
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
180.00
GYM TIME FEE
108467
4460
4077.6102
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
324.00
270546
3/31/2005
106020 EDINA RESOURCE CENTER
33,372.00
2005 FUNDING
108613
031605
1507.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
FAMILINK EDINA
33,372.00
270547
3/31/2005
116448 EGAN OIL COMPANY
14,969.33
GAS
108695
099694
1553.6581
GASOLINE
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
14,969.33
CITY OF EDINA
arovicvvv w:o i va
R55CKREG
LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 9
3/25/2005
— 3/31/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Descrlptlon
Business Unit
270548
3131/2005
101407 EGAN, MATT
59.98
UNIFORM PURCHASE
108575
032405
5913.6201
LAUNDRY
DISTRIBUTION
59.98
270549
313112005
106194 EMA INC.
1,740.00
SCADA LIFT
108356
5604 - 90008160
10028.1705.20
CONSULTING DESIGN
LIFT STATION #5
1,978.17
SCADA DESIGN
108576
560490008201
04284.1705.20
CONSULTING DESIGN
SCADA STORM SEWER
5,275.11
SCADA DESIGN
108576
560490008201
05414.1705.20
CONSULTING DESIGN
SCADA WATERMAIN
5,934.50
SCADA DESIGN
108576
560490008201
03404.1705.20
CONSULTING DESIGN
SCADA SANITARY SEWER
14,927.78
270550
313112005
118022 ENGLER, ERICK
104.00
TRIP REFUND
108403
032105
1628.4392.07
SENIOR TRIPS
SENIOR CITIZENS
104.00
270551
3131/2005
105339 ENRGI
30.00
WEBSITE TESTING
108468
2574
2210.6124
WEB DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNICATIONS
976.25
WEBSITE CONSULTING
108469
2565
2210.6124
WEB DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNICATIONS
1,006.25
270552
3/31/2005
104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC.
128.00
108651
288924
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
128.00
270553
3/3112005
105420 FIKES SERVICES
34.08
AIR DEODORIZERS
108577
563598
5841.6162
SERVICES CUSTODIANS
YORK OCCUPANCY
34.08
270554
3/31/2005
114661 FIRESIDE HEARTH & HOME
52.24
PERMIT REFUND
108578
ED031521
1495.4110
HEATING & VENTING LICENSE
INSPECTIONS
52.24
270555
3131/2005
108632 GALLES CORPORATION
294.07
CLEANING SUPPLIES
108696
108747
1470.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
294.07
270556
3131/2005
105508 GEMPLER'S INC.
119.35
PRUNER
108614
1006039955
5620.6556
TOOLS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
119.35
270557
3131/2005
111343 GLANZER, ROGER
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
3125/2005 - 3/31/2005
Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
89 39 WIRE CONNECTORS 108697 032505 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
TEEN SAFETY CAMP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
3/30/2005 10:51:09
Page - 10
Business Unit
DISTRIBUTION
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
SPECIAL OPERATIONS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
PSTF OCCUPANCY
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
89.39
YORK SELLING
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
270558
3/31/2005
118046 GOERNE, NANCY
5.00
PROGRAM REFUND
108698
032505
1600.4390.42
5.00
270559
3/3112005
101103 GRAINGER
215.34
BRUSHES, TIE DOWNS
108357
495- 707390 -3
1301.6406
22.68
HACKSAW BLADES
108580
498 - 578317 -6
1480.6710
44.56
CLEVIS, SORBENT, CLEANER
108615
498 - 603799 -4
5620.6406
51.18
HAZ WASTE LABELS
108699
973 - 535175 -2
7411.6406
333.76
270560
3131/2005
102670 GRAND PERE WINES INC
199.00
108514
00015405
5862.5513
199.00 -
270561
3/31/2005
102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC
377.00
108515
71512
5822.5513
413.00
108652
71546
5842.5513
790.00
270562
3/31/2005
101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE
561.93
CONFERENCE EXPENSE
108404
032205
5840.6104
561.93
270563
3131/2005
100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC.
77.70
BULBS
108616
907736248
5630.6406
77.70
270564
3/31/2005
100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
1,640.50
108432
207022
5842.5512
207.50-
108433
662382
5842.5513
126.20
108516
208491
5842.5515
1,372.20
108517
208387
5842.5512
6,742.13
108518
208492
5842.5512
1,100.19
108519
. 208488.
5822.5512
99.05
108653
208482
5862.5515
.85
108654
208212
5862.5512
3,376.40
108655
208483
5862.5512
37.95-
108656
662833
5822.5513
TEEN SAFETY CAMP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
3/30/2005 10:51:09
Page - 10
Business Unit
DISTRIBUTION
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
SPECIAL OPERATIONS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
PSTF OCCUPANCY
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/3012005 10:51:09
Council Check Register Page - 11
3/25/2005 - 3/31/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
14,212.07
270565
3/3112005
106431 HALL, MARY
150.00
PERFORMANCE 4/7/05
108338
032205
5610.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
ED ADMINISTRATION
150.00
270566
313112005
100791 HALLMAN OIL COMPANY
431.96
DELO GREASE
108470
148252
1553.6584
LUBRICANTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
431.96
270567
313112005
102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS
99.90
RIBBON
108471
240537
5862.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
VERNON SELLING
107.90
PAPER
108471
240537
5862.6512
PAPER SUPPLIES
VERNON SELLING
207.80
270566
3/3112005
102618 HARDWOOD CREEK LUMBER INC
682.29
HUBS 8 LATHS
108358
5848
1260.6577
LUMBER
ENGINEERING GENERAL
682.29
270569
3/31/2005
101215 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFI
999.42
PROCESSING FEES -FEB 2005
108472
505
1195.6170
COURT CHARGES
LEGAL SERVICES
999.42
270570
3/31/2005
100805 HIRSHFIELD'S
74.97
PAINT
108617
011762382
5620.6532
PAINT
EDINBOROUGH PARK
25.02
PAINT
108618
003969694
5420.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CLUB HOUSE
99.99
270571
313112005
104375 HOHENSTEINS INC.
248.50
108434
354583
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
958.95
108657
354727
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
1,207.45
270572
3131/2005
112558 ISAAMAN, TREVOR
378.54
DRILL, DRILL BITS
108405
032105
5422.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
378.54
270573
313112005
103326 J. MARCEL ENTERPRISES
407.42
WHITE POLOS
108473
072220
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
407.42
270574
313112005
101446 JAMIESON AND ASSOCIATES INC.
5912.6406
5620.6201
5842.5513
5842.5513
5842.5513
5822.5512
5822.5512
5822.5512
5862.5513
5862.5513
5842.5512
5842.5512
5842.5515
5842.5512
5822.5513
5822.5512
5822.5512
5862.5512
5862.5512
5125.6406
1280.6104
GENERAL SUPPLIES
3130/2005 10:51:09
Page - 12
Business Unit
CITY HALL /POLICE BUILDING
POOL ADMINISTRATION
BUILDINGS
LAUNDRY EDINBOROUGH PARK
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
GENERAL SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS` SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD
CITY OF EDINA
R55CKREG LOG20000
270576
3/31/2005
100833 JOHN HENRY FOSTER
Council Check Register
3/2512005 - 3/3112005
DRAIN FLOATS
Check # Date Amount
Vendor / Explanation
PO # Doc No Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
3,254.70
FINAL A.V. PAYMENT
108700 1 /31 /05STMT 4400.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
3,254.70
3131/2005
102059 JOHNS, RICHARD
270575 3/31/2005
100830 JERRY'S PRINTING
15230
POOL SEASON PASSES
108474 32373 5310.6575.
PRINTING
5912.6406
5620.6201
5842.5513
5842.5513
5842.5513
5822.5512
5822.5512
5822.5512
5862.5513
5862.5513
5842.5512
5842.5512
5842.5515
5842.5512
5822.5513
5822.5512
5822.5512
5862.5512
5862.5512
5125.6406
1280.6104
GENERAL SUPPLIES
3130/2005 10:51:09
Page - 12
Business Unit
CITY HALL /POLICE BUILDING
POOL ADMINISTRATION
BUILDINGS
LAUNDRY EDINBOROUGH PARK
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
GENERAL SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS` SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD
152.30
270576
3/31/2005
100833 JOHN HENRY FOSTER
MINNESOTA IN
119.28
DRAIN FLOATS
108581
1369658 -01
119.28
270577
3131/2005
102059 JOHNS, RICHARD
92.94
UNIFORM PURCHASE
108619
032505
92.94
270578
3/31/2005
100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS
LIQUOR CO.
3,874.73
108435
1870611
110.40
108436
1870614
1,727.35
108437
1870615
13.92-
108438
276459
9.08-
108439
276457
1.78-
108440
276456
39.95-
108520.
276455
27.90-
108521
276759
1,775.77
108658
1874167
8,216.28
108659
1874168
65.40
108660
1874170
365.55
108661
1874165
416.85
108662
1874161
470.19
108663
1874163
346.23
108664
1874164
7.39-
108665
276458
84.09-
108666
276454
17,184.64
270579
3/31/2005
102719 JOHNSON, PHILLIP
87.31
SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT
108475
032205
87.31
270580
3/31/2005
103201 JOHNSON, STEVE
414.19
EQ SHOW EXPENSES.
108476
031805
414.19
5912.6406
5620.6201
5842.5513
5842.5513
5842.5513
5822.5512
5822.5512
5822.5512
5862.5513
5862.5513
5842.5512
5842.5512
5842.5515
5842.5512
5822.5513
5822.5512
5822.5512
5862.5512
5862.5512
5125.6406
1280.6104
GENERAL SUPPLIES
3130/2005 10:51:09
Page - 12
Business Unit
CITY HALL /POLICE BUILDING
POOL ADMINISTRATION
BUILDINGS
LAUNDRY EDINBOROUGH PARK
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
GENERAL SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS` SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD
R55CKREG LOG20000
94.00
GOLF CLUB
CITY OF EDINA
030912
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
Council Check Register
GOLF CLUBS
108407
030823
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
3/25/2005 - 3/31/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
270581
313112005
100839 KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES
341.81
BUSHINGS, SHEAVES 108582
L871688 5923.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
108620
2281860
341.81
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
270582
313112005
111018 KEEPRS INC.
270585 3/3112005
179.90
UNIFORM PANTS 108583
32111 -02 1470.6558
DEPT UNIFORMS
179.90
1,919.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
270583
3131/2005
5110.6103
108857 KEN GORG GOLF SHOP
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
3/30/2005 10:51:09
Page - 13
Business Unit
COLLECTION SYSTEMS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
94.00
GOLF CLUB
108406
030912
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
190.00
GOLF CLUBS
108407
030823
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
284.00
270584 313112005
116295 KING PAR CORPORATION
557.08
MERCHANDISE
108620
2281860
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
557.08
270585 3/3112005
101185 KNUTSON, KAREN
1,919.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
108701
032505
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
1,919.00
270586 313112005
100846 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO
2,537.05
108441
430385
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
448.00
108442
430356
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
16.00
108667
430922
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
817.30
108668
430924
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
36.00
108669
430923
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
3,854.35
270587 313112005
100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
434.71
LOCKNUTS, HOLESAWS
108584
3008878
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
434.71
270588 313112005
101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
20.00
CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
108477
1 -000020641
1400.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
20.00
CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
108478
1 -000020639
1400.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
40.00
270589 3/3112005
118027 LENCO INDUSTRIES
160,691.00
BEARCAT RESPONSE VEHICLE
108479
7685
1400.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
180,691.00
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation
270590 3/3112005 100858 LOGIS
31.00
1,178.00
2,242.00
2,355.00
2,484.00
3,956.00
270591
3/3112005
5842.5514
116618 LUTERBACH, TERESA
Council Check Register
776334
5.00
PROGRAM REFUND
- 3/31/2005
774511
5.00
Inv No
270592
313112005
108480
112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP
1554.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
597.01
25037
2210.6160
DATA PROCESSING
609.02
25037
1120.6160
DATA PROCESSING
1,206.03
25037
270593
3/31/2005
108480
100864 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC.
1554.6160
DATA PROCESSING
274.00
TUBE ASSEMBLIES, SCRAPER
5910.6160
DATA PROCESSING
274.00-
CREDIT -
1190.6160
DATA PROCESSING
659.49
HYDRO FLUID, FILTER
1160.6160
DATA PROCESSING
659.49
032505
270594
3/3112005
108443
100868 MARK VII SALES
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
1,054.11
176608 -
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
1,774.05
592.40
123.45
1,250.85
2,549.30
108703 2052111 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS
108704 5767 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS
108705 2052263 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS
108444
CITY OF EDINA
5842.5514
Council Check Register
776334
5862.5514
3125/2005
- 3/31/2005
774511
PO # Doc,No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
108480
25037
1554.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
108480
25037
2210.6160
DATA PROCESSING
108480
25037
1120.6160
DATA PROCESSING
108480
25037
1495.6160
DATA PROCESSING
108480
25037
1554.6160
DATA PROCESSING
108480
25037
5910.6160
DATA PROCESSING
108480
25037
1190.6160
DATA PROCESSING
108460
25037
1160.6160
DATA PROCESSING
108702
032505
1600.4390.42
TEEN SAFETY CAMP
108443
176417
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
108522
176608 -
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
108703 2052111 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS
108704 5767 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS
108705 2052263 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS
108444
776319
5842.5514
108523
776334
5862.5514
108524
774511
5862.5514
108525
776335
5862.5515
108526
777303
5862.5514
108527
776903
5842.5514
108528
776904
5842.5515
108670
778257
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
3/30/2005 10:51:09
Page - 14
Business Unit
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
COMMUNICATIONS
ADMINISTRATION
INSPECTIONS
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
GENERAL (BILLING)
ASSESSING
FINANCE
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
270595 3/31/2005 101030 MATHISON CO.
43.08 TRANSFER GRAPHITE 108481 595202 -0 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
43.08
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
3/25/2005
— 3/31/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
270596
313112005
102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC
62.50
ENGINEERING CHARGES
108706
23633
1550.6188
TELEPHONE
62.50
270597
3131/2005
100870 MATRX
122.00
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
108585
685313
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
122.00
270598
3/31/2005
100875 MCCAREN DESIGNS INC.
1,115.91
PLANTS
108621
30513
5620.6620
TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS
1,115.91
270599
3131/2005
118030 MCGRAW -HILL COMPANIES
319.43
REFERENCE BOOKS
108482
13124606001
5120.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
319.43
270600
313112005
102097 MCMASTER -CARR SUPPLY COMPANY
127.63
PLIERS, DRILL BITS
108586
19658610
1343.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
127.63
270601
3/3112005
103189 MEDICA
77,938.45
HIGH OPTION
108359
105091102386
1550.6040
HOSPITALIZATION
77,938.45
270602
3/31/2005
103189 MEDICA
1,675.18
LOW OPTION
108360
105091122552
1550.6040
HOSPITALIZATION
1,675.18
270603
3/31/2005
103189 MEDICA
5,069.08
SELECT OPTION
108361
105091134271
1550.6040
HOSPITALIZATION
5,069.08
270604
3/3112005
103189 MEDICA
57,752.09
ELECT OPTION
108362
105091125472
1550.6040
HOSPITALIZATION
57,752.09
270605
3/3112005
101483 MENARDS
11.27
CEDAR, VINYL
108408
9138
5420.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
94.61
CHAIR
108409
8711
5422.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
105.88
270606
3/31/2005
101987 MENARDS
3130/2005 10:51:09
Page - 15
Business Unit
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
EDINBOROUGH PARK
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
BRIDGES GUARD RAILS
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CLUB HOUSE
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
100882 MERIT SUPPLY
Council Check Register
52.19
RED PADS
108363
3125/2005 - 313112005
5840.6406
Check # Date Amount
Vendor / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
34.01
DUCT TAPE, LOCKS
108622
74342 5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
267.35
PAINT & BRUSHES
108623
73767 5630.6532
PAINT
55.24
CHAIN, DRILL BITS, BULBS
108624
71898 5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
26.44
FILTER, TOOL, SPONGES
108625
70115 5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
270607 313112005
270608 3131/2005
270609 3/3112005
270610 3/3112005
270611 313112005
270612 3/3112005
270613 3/3112005
I
383.04
100882 MERIT SUPPLY
52.19
RED PADS
108363
66497
5840.6406
3,977.88
MICROMAX AUTOSCRUBBER
108364
66496
5841.6406
1,015.90
LINERS, WYPALL
108365
66532
5511.6511
124.18
GRILL CLEANER, BAGS
108410
66516
5421.6511
164.86
TISSUE, CUPS, LINERS
108587
66558
1552.6511
5,335.01
100410 METROCALL
366.20
PAGERS
108483
02149654 -1
1400.6151
366.20
104650 MICRO CENTER
10.64
TECH SUPPLIES
108366
838045
1120.6406
95.84
TECH SUPPLIES
108366
838045
1554.6406
7.44
TECH SUPPLIES
108367
854579
1554.6406
42.59
TECH SUPPLIES
108367
854579
1260.6710
156.51
100692 MIDWEST COCA -COLA EAGAN
149.90
108445
82591138
5822.5515
292.20
108446
83629136
5842.5515
400.20
108447
82591203
5862.5515
842.30
102386 MINNEAPOLIS POLICE CONCERT
BAN
100.00
PERFORMANCE 4/3/05
108336
032205
5610.6136
100.00
101410 MINNESOTA STATE BOARD OF ELECT
30.00
LICENSE RENEWAL
108626
PL04137 -2005
1281.6104
30.00
118033 MINNESOTA STATE FIRE RESCUE SC
105.00
FF II REVIEW & TEST
108588
031405
1470.6104
105.00
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CLEANING SUPPLIES
CLEANING SUPPLIES
CLEANING SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
3/30/2005 10:51:09
Page - 16
Business Unit
EDINBOROUGH PARK
CENTENNIAL LAKES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
YORK OCCUPANCY
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
GRILL
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
ADMINISTRATION
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
ENGINEERING GENERAL
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation
270614
3131/2005
5630.6180
105921 MSTMA
108628
451331 -00
65.00
MEMBERSHIP FEES
108629
451338 -00
65.00
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
270615
3/3112005
5630.6180
100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC.
1554.6230
37.24
BEARING, OIL FILTERS
148.60
REEL SHARPENING
270618
313112005
152.98
REEL SHARPENING
600.88
REEL SHARPENING
7,299.42
120.06-
CREDIT
11223157
1318.6525
819.64
270616
313112005
108590
100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO.
1318.6406
69.00
7,354.11
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
3/25/2005 - 3/31/2005
PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
108368 032205 1640.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
108589
452428 -00
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
108627
451335 -00
5630.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
108628
451331 -00
5630.6160
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
108629
451338 -00
5630.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
108630
451942 -00
5630.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
108529 30503 5822.5513
108530 30502 5862.5513
108671 30504 5842.5513
270617
3/3112005
104672 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
17.65
108631
679000121028
1120.6188
66.40
108631
679000121028
1554.6230
84.05
270618
313112005
117102 NORTH AMERICAN SALT CO.
7,299.42
ICE CONTROL SALT
108369
11223157
1318.6525
54.69
FUEL SURCHARGE
108590
11221796
1318.6406
7,354.11
270619
3/3112005
105672 NORTHERN POWER PRODUCTS INC.
15.46
SPARK PLUGS
108370
149743
1553.6530
15.46
270620
313112005
100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY
306.37
D'ARCHES, CHARCOAL
108484
31161100
5120.5510
78.24
TAPE
108485
31186900
5120.5510
384.61
270621
313112005
100930 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO.
140.79
TIRE SERVICE
108579
NW -94809
1553.6583
140.79
3/30/2005 10:51:09
Page - 17
Business Unit
PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
CENTENNIAL LAKES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS
SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
• � , 7
CITY OF EDINA
3/30/2005 10:51:09
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 18
3/25/2005
- 3/31/2005
Check # Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
270622 313112005
113442 O'CONNELL, RAYMOND
64.70
BRICK FOR NEW SIGN
108411
032105
5422.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
64.70
270623 3131/2005
100936 OLSEN COMPANIES
520.85
CHAIN SLING, HOOK
108371
327862
1553.6556
TOOLS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
520.85
270624 3131/2005
100347 PAUSTIS & SONS
825.70
108531
8064683 -IN
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
3,586.80
108532
8064682 -IN
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
144.53
108533
8063328 -IN
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
358.80-
108534
8064329 -CM
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
6,926.80
108672
8064684 -IN
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
11,125.03
270625 313112005
110832 PC2 SOLUTIONS, INC.
586.90
TECH SUPPORT
108412
21205009
5913.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
DISTRIBUTION
525.00
TECH SUPPORT
108413
31205007
1400.6160
DATA PROCESSING
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
595.00
TECH SUPPORT
108413
31205007
1554.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
1,706.90
270626 3/3112005
100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY
333.90
108414
76554732
5210.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
333.90
270627 3/3112005
100946 PERA
78,224.92
PPEND 3/22105
108707
032505
1000.2023
P.E.R.A. PAYABLE
GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
78,224.92
270628 313112005
100950 PETTY CASH
1.24
108423
032205
2210.6408
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
COMMUNICATIONS
1.98
108423
032205
2210.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COMMUNICATIONS
5.00
108423
032205
1140.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
PLANNING
6.36
108423
032205
1190.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ASSESSING
7.35
108423
032205
5910.6235
POSTAGE
GENERAL (BILLING)
9.00
108423
032205
1281.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
TRAINING
10.00
108423
032205
1600.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
10.00
108423
032205
1001.8060
CASH OVER AND UNDER
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
11.50
108423
032205
1190.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
ASSESSING
13.00
108423
032205
2210.6106
MEETING EXPENSE
COMMUNICATIONS
13.00
108423
032205
5840.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
• � , 7
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
3125/2005 - 3/31/2005
3/30/2005 10:51:09
Page - 19
Check # Date Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Descriptlon
Business Unit
13.15
108423
032205
1100.6106
MEETING EXPENSE
CITY COUNCIL
14.86
108423
032205
5842.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
YORK SELLING
15.92
108423
032205
1504.6218
EDUCATION PROGRAMS
HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION
16.00
108423
032205
5511.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
17.00
108423
032205
1490.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
PUBLIC HEALTH
20.00
108423
032205
1120.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
ADMINISTRATION
20.00
108423
032205
2210.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
COMMUNICATIONS
20.23
108423
032205
5952.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
RECYCLING
21.00
108423
032205
1490.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
PUBLIC HEALTH
21.18
108423
032205
5913.6106
MEETING EXPENSE
DISTRIBUTION
22.88
108423
032205
1260.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
ENGINEERING GENERAL
26.09
108423
032205
1600.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
29.50
108423
032205
1640.6260
LICENSES & PERMITS
PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL
30.00
108423
032205
1554.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
30.41
108423
032205
1629.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ADAPTIVE RECREATION
36.00
108423
032205
5860.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
41.35
108423
032205
1500.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CONTINGENCIES
53.04
108423
032205
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
55.18
108423
032205
1190.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
ASSESSING
56.80
108423
032205
5840.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
63.93
108423
032205
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
100.00
108423
032205
1550.6121
ADVERTISING PERSONNEL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
812.95
270629 3/31/2005
100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
2,228,39
108448
2176978
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
61.45
108449
2176979
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
2,680.36
108450
2176980
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
142.45-
108451
3314983
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
3,522.78
108673
2179509
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
3,749.01
108674
2179511
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
258.10
108675
2179506
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
697.90
108676
2179507
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
90.60
108677
2179508
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
13,166.14
270630 3131/2005
100119 PING
665.93
IRONS SET
108415
7239086
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
1,247.65
GOLF BAGS, HEADWEAR
108632
7244002
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
2,113.74
IRONS, PUTTERS
108633
7243973
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
202.10
GOLF BAGS
108634
7243993
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
4,229.42
CITY OF EDINA
3/30/2005 10:51:09
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 20
3/2512005
- 3/31/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor I Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
270631
. 3/31/2005
102156 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING
181.75
108452
50961
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
181.75
270632
313112005
116336 PLYMOUTH PLUMBING
27.28
PERMIT REFUND
108592
ED028329
1495.4112
PLUMBING PERMITS
INSPECTIONS
27.28
270633
313112005
100961 POSTMASTER
185.00
POSTAGE
108708
032505
5110.6235
POSTAGE
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
185.00
270634
3/31/2005
106152 POWERPLAN
-
25.92
SWITCH
108591
164849
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
25.92
270635
3/31/2005
100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC
153.00
BLADE SHARPENING
108372
209843
5521.6215
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
ARENA ICE MAINT
153.00
270636
313112005
100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY
85.65
108453
206441
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
3,229.69
108535.
208485
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
77,25
108536
208486
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
336.02
108537
208489
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
3,728.61
270637
3/31/2005
106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY
461.05
PURELL, TISSUE, LINERS
108635
3514
5620.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
262.60
ROLL TOWELS, CLEANERS
108636
3519,
5620.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
723.65
270638
3/31/2005
116481 PUTTING GREENS OF MINNESOTA
319.50
SAMPLE MAT
108416
103
5210.6590
RANGE BALLS
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
319.50
270639
3/31/2005
102964 QUALIFICATION TARGETS
58.58
TRAINING TARGETS
108486
20500630
1400.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
58.58
270640
3/31/2005
100971 QUALITY WINE
N
CITY OF EDINA
3/30/2005 10:51:09
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 21
3/25/2005
- 3/31/2005
Check # Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
6.63-
108538
530249 -00
5840.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
671.61
108538
530249 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
19.20-
108539
530270 -00
5840.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
1,954.21
108539
530270 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
63.01-
108540
530424 -00
5840.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
3,174.05
108540
530424 -00
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
1,0¢
108541
530310 -00
5820.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
50TH STREET GENERAL
104.92
108541
530310 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
12.30-
108542
530354 -00
5820.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
50TH STREET GENERAL
618.62
108542
530354 -00
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
16.25-
108543
530250 -00
5820.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
50TH STREET GENERAL
1,640.51
108543
530250 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
3.00-
108544
530248 -00
5820.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
50TH STREET GENERAL
303.70
108544
530248 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
13.13-
108545
530271 -00
5860.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
1,329.72
108545
530271 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
40.19-
108546
530251 -00
5860.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
4,058.41
108546
530251 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
30.66-
108678
530418 -00
5860.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
1,548.68
108678
530418 -00
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
15,199.02
270641 313112005
101965 QWEST
111.73
952 920 -8166
108709
8166 -3/05
1550.6188
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
111.73
270642 313112005
100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY
457.00
PLUMBING REPAIRS
108637
38901
1551.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
CITY HALL GENERAL
457.00
270643 3/31/2005
100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO.
52.72
SOFTENER SALT
108710
00160831
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
52.72
270644 313112005
104788 SANDY'S PROMOTIONAL STUFF
708.82
PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS
108593
SH5027
2210.6575
PRINTING
COMMUNICATIONS
216.33
EASTER SCRAMBLE EGGS
108594
SH5039
2210.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COMMUNICATIONS
925.15
270645 313112005
118035 SATTERTHWAITE, ANN
21.00
DUPLICATE PMT REFUND
108638
032405
1400.4120
DOG LICENSES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
21.00
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
3/25/2005
— 3/31/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
270646
313112005
105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO.
21.30
LUMBER
108373
40055397
1646.6577
LUMBER
56.80
LUMBER
108374
40054663
1646.6577
LUMBER
232.82
LUMBER, NAILS
108375
40052084
1318.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
310.92
270647
3/31/2005
100998 .SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO.
136.00
PAINT
108595
7445 -3
4090.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
136.00
270648
3131/2005
105712 SICO AMERICA INC.
1,274.83
DANCE FLOOR EDGING
108639
1384938
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1,274.83
270649
3131/2005
100999 SIGNAL SYSTEMS INC.
95.00
RIBBON, SET DLS DATES
108376
75681
5511.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
95.00
270650
3/31/2005
101000 SIR SPEEDY
325.19
BUSINESS CARD SHELLS
108640
46731
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
325.19
270651
3/31/2005
118034 SLB OF MINNESOTA LLC
387.22
SPECIAL MEETINGS
108641
34610EDINA
1100.6106
MEETING EXPENSE
387.22
270652
3131/2005
101002 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS INC
666.25
108547
162326
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
13.85
108548
162327
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
3,064.05
108549
162331
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
38.75
108550
162332
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
3,782.90
270653
3/3112005
116682 SPECIALTY WINE & BEVERAGES
3/30/2005 10:51:09
Page - 1 22
Business Unit
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
STREET REVOLVING
EDINBOROUGH PARK
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CITY COUNCIL
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
89.00 . 108679 2185 ,. 5862.5512 1 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
270654 3131/2005 101462 SPORT HALEY INC.
1,440.08. MERCHANDISE
1,440.08
108642 PSI -040907 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
CITY OF EDINA
3/30/2005 10:51:09
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 23
3/25/2005
- 3/31/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
270655
3/3112005
103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC
138.97
SUPPORT
108377
SI36421
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
138.97
270656
3/3112005
100650 STANLEY SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC
36.44
KEY BLANKS KEYED
108378
MN- 364505
5511.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
36.44
270657
3/3112005
116631 STELLAR ENERGY SERVICES INC.
409.02
GENERATOR REPAIR
108711
1312
1470.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
409.02
270658
3/3112005
101015 STREICHERS
31.90
TRAINING AMMO
108487
1255066
1400.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
87.20
HEADLIGHT REPAIR
108712
1255257
1470.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
119.10
270659
3/3112005
104349 STRUCTURED NETWORK SOLUTIONS
102.08
SERVER INSTALLATION
108643
11791
1554.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
102.08
270660
313112005
101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
98.67
MAT PACKAGE
108379
383755CVW
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
98.67
270661
3/3112005
102140 SUN MOUNTAIN SPORTS INC.
3,256.82
MERCHANDISE
108417
545732
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
257.50
GOLF BAGS
108644
546731
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
3,514.32
270662
313112005
110674 SUPERIOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIO
26.50
PHONE CASE
108380
9243
1322.6188
TELEPHONE
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
26.50
270663
313112005
104412 TANDY BRANDS ACCESSORIES
868.74
MERCHANDISE
108645
2458125
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
868.74
270664
3131/2005
101027 TARGET
52.59
BINDERS
108646
0766412
5410.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
52.59
Subledger Account Description
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
3/30/2005 10:51:09
Page - 24
Business Unit
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
MEETING EXPENSE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CITY COUNCIL
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS
MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS
MAGAZINEINEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS
REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING
GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING
CITY OF EDINA
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
312512005
— 3/31/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
270665
3/3112005
101474 TITLEIST
2,676.78
GOLF BALLS
108488
1934067
5440.5511
253.80
GOLF BALLS
108489
1951579
5440.5511
1,697.54-
CREDIT ON ACCT
108490
CREDIT
5440.5511
1,233.04
270666
313112005
116302 TRI - ANIM HEALTH SERVICES INC
1,030.00
NEBULIZERS
108713
MMH50687259
1470.6510
1,030.00
270667
313112005
103981 TWIN CITY OFFICE SUPPLY INC.
92.48
PRINTER DRUM
108491
457325-0
5110.6513
92.48
270668
313112005
118031 TWIN CITY SCALE COMPANY INC.
100.00
REPAIR
108492
00045742
1400.6215
100.00
270669
313112005
118020 TWIN WEST CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
25.00
LEGISLATIVE BREAKFAST
108381
46810
1100.6106
25.00
270670
3131/2005
102104 UNDIS, PAT
1,919.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
108714
032505
5110.6103
1,919.00
270671
313112005
102026 UNISOURCE
948.86
P &R INSIDER PAPER
108382
59363229900
2210.6123
1,787.34
ABOUT TOWN PAPER
108715
59307452500
2210.6123
6,019.94
ABOUT TOWN PAPER
108716
59307453000
2210.6123
8,756.14
270672
313112005
101053 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY
49.25
LIGHTING
108596
928004
1552.6530
860.86
GENERATOR PLUGS
108717
924905
5913.6406
910.11
270673
3/3112005
101073 UNITED RENTALS
116.00
TRAFFIC CONTROL SEMINAR
108383
46772443 -001
1281.6104
116.00
270674
313112005
102090 URBAN LAND INSTITUTE
Subledger Account Description
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
3/30/2005 10:51:09
Page - 24
Business Unit
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
MEETING EXPENSE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CITY COUNCIL
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS
MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS
MAGAZINEINEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS
REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING
GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING
,to
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation
Council Check Register
190.00
DUES RENEWAL
3/25/2005
190.00
270675
3/3112005
Inv No
100050 LISPS
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
4,000.00
ACCT #75983
1120.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
4,000.00
108647
270676
3/3112005
POSTAGE
118029 VALESANO, SARAH
108493
032205
42.00
CLASS REFUND
ART CENTER REVENUES
108494
42.00
5111.6406
270677
313112005
108718
101058 VAN PAPER CO.
7411.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
125.94
TOWELS, TISSUE, CUPS
3595708789
5420.6188
218.86
GUN CLEANING SUPPLIES
108419
3595708789
344.80
TELEPHONE
270676
3131/2005
3595708789
102970 VERIZON WIRELESS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PUBLIC HEALTH
.55
3595708769
1190.6188
TELEPHONE
8.09
108419
3595708789
1495.6188
8.09
INSPECTIONS
108419
3595708789
8.53
TELEPHONE
COMMUNICATIONS
108419
27.66
1120.6188
TELEPHONE
ADMINISTRATION
33.08
3595708789
1600.6188
TELEPHONE
58.41
108419
3595708789
1640.6188
69.94
PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL
108419
3595708789
89.15
TELEPHONE
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
108495
141.61
1400.6188
TELEPHONE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
517.49
190035- 2005
5410.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
962.60
108385
270679
3/31/2005
GENERAL SUPPLIES
102571 VGM GOLF
108386
15009593 -00
160.00
DUES
50TH STREET GENERAL
108386
160.00
5111.6406
270680
313112005
108420
101069 VOSS LIGHTING
1628.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
61.86
LIGHTING
144.41
LIGHTING
289.63
LIGHTING
495.90
270681
3/31/2005
105440 WEIGLE, SUE
7.03
PETTY CASH
CITY OF EDINA
3/30/2005 10:51:09
Council Check Register
Page - 25
3/25/2005
- 3/31/2005
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
108384
17873 -2005
1120.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
ADMINISTRATION
108647
032405
1550.6235
POSTAGE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
108493
032205
5101.4607
CLASS REGISTRATION
ART CENTER REVENUES
108494
573439
5111.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT
108718
574432
7411.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PSTF OCCUPANCY
108419
3595708789
5420.6188
TELEPHONE
CLUB HOUSE
108419
3595708789
1140.6188
TELEPHONE
PLANNING
108419
3595708789
1490.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PUBLIC HEALTH
108419
3595708769
1190.6188
TELEPHONE
ASSESSING
108419
3595708789
1495.6188
TELEPHONE
INSPECTIONS
108419
3595708789
2210.6188
TELEPHONE
COMMUNICATIONS
108419
3595708789
1120.6188
TELEPHONE
ADMINISTRATION
108419
3595708789
1600.6188
TELEPHONE
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
108419
3595708789
1640.6188
TELEPHONE
PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL
108419
3595708789
1470.6188
TELEPHONE
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
108495
3595711857
1400.6188
TELEPHONE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
108418
190035- 2005
5410.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
108385
15009721 -00
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
108386
15009593 -00
5820.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
50TH STREET GENERAL
108386
15009593 -00
5111.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT
108420
032105
1628.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
SENIOR CITIZENS
CITY OF EDINA
3/30/2005 10:51:09
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 26
3/25/2005
- 3131/2005
Check # Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
72.19
PETTY CASH
108420
032105
1628.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SENIOR CITIZENS
96.00
PETTY CASH
108420
032105
1628.4392.09
SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS
SENIOR CITIZENS
175.22
270682 3131/2005
118018 WESTSIDE TROMBONE QUARTET
150.00
PERFORMANCE 4/5/05
108337
032205
5610.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
ED ADMINISTRATION
150.00
270683 3/31/2005
101033 WINE COMPANY, THE
554.40
108551
112000 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
682.40
108552
112091 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
228.80
108553
111998 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
6.67-
108554
111950 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
26.68-
108555
111420 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,432.25
270684 3/3112005
101312 WINE MERCHANTS
200.00
108454
119829
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
409.82
108455
119783
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
594.23
108456
119921
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,383.43
108556
119922
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
609.97
108680
120388
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
3,197.45
270685 3131/2005
112954 WISCONSIN TURF EQUIPMENT CORP.
20.75
PARTS BOOK
108597
511635 -000
1553.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
20.75
270686 3131/2005
101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC
269.00
108557
162612
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,195.25
108681
162683
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
264.00
108682
162535
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,728.25
270687 313112005
101726 XCEL ENERGY
1,589.06
108387
20417372
5630.6185
LIGHT & POWER
CENTENNIAL LAKES
2,806.44
108388
20597443
5420.6185
LIGHT & POWER
CLUB HOUSE
4.65
108421
20606952
5861.6185
LIGHT & POWER
VERNON OCCUPANCY
1,249.40
108421
20606952
5841.6185
LIGHT & POWER
YORK OCCUPANCY
27.77
108422
20720181
1330.6185
LIGHT & POWER
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
2,343.70
108496
20874371
5511.6185
LIGHT & POWER
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
127.86
108497
20903355
4086.6185
LIGHT & POWER
AQUATIC WEEDS
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
3/25/2005 — 3/31/2005
Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No
1,493.78 108719 20878112 7411.6185
6,749.94 108720 21421453 5620.6185
16, 392.60
270688 313112005 115344 XEROX OMNIFAX
355.95 2ND FL FAX SERVICE 108598 11210441 1550.6230
215.28 FAX DRUM 108721 11209021 1550.6406
571.23
270689 313112005 103584 XPEDX
Subledger Account Description
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
3/30/2005 10:51:09
Page - 27
Business Unit
PSTF OCCUPANCY
EDINBOROUGH PARK
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT . CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
1,173.65 LETTERHEAD PAPER 108722 N342371211 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
1,173.65
270690 3/31/2005 118028 YAHOOI CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS
20.37 COST OF ADMIN SUBPOENA 108498 35430 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
20.37
757,361.78 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals
Check Total 757,361.78
Total Payments 757,361.78
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/30/2005 10:57:27
Councll Check Summary Page - 1
3125/2005 - 3/31/2005
Company
Amount
01000 GENERAL FUND
525,649.19
02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND
12,538.98
04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND
3,842.56
05100 ART CENTER FUND
5,973.47
05200 GOLF DOME FUND
10,227.79
05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND
223.77
05400 GOLF COURSE FUND
24,093.23
05500 ICE ARENA FUND
3,660.04
05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND
14,731.22
05800 LIQUOR FUND
128,062.03
05900 UTILITY FUND
22,164.42
05930 STORM SEWER FUND
1,978.17
05950 RECYCLING FUND
20.23
07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND
4,196.68
Report Totals 757,361.78
R -1
We confirm to the best of our bwwledge
and belief, that these claims
comply in all materiel respects
with the requirements of the City
of Edina purchasing nollcMe and
procedures
Finance
City Manager
4
OORSEY
DOPSEY & WHITNEY LLP
AGENDA ITEM NO. V. B.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Gordon Hughes, City Manager
FROM: Jerome P. Gilligan
DATE: March 31, 2005
RE: Proposed Issuance of Revenue Bonds by the City of Minneapolis for Fairview
Hospital and Healthcare Services
At its meeting on April 5th the City Council will hold a public hearing on a proposal from
Fairview Health Services ( "Fairview ") that the City consent to the issuance by the City of
Minneapolis of tax - exempt revenue bonds under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.152 to
469.165, to finance a remodeling project at Fairview Southdale Hospital and to refund bonds
previously issued by the Minnesota Agricultural and Economic Development Board in 1997 and
2000, a portion of proceeds of which financed improvements at Fairview Southdale. The City
has previously consented to Minneapolis issuing revenue bonds under this authority on behalf
of Fairview to finance improvements to the Hospital. The City has also previously approved
other cities issuing revenue bonds to finance facilities of other non - profit corporations in the City.
Federal law for tax - exempt bonds requires that the City hold a public hearing on the proposed
financing and refunding prior to giving such approval.
The bonds would be issued as part of a larger issue by Minneapolis to finance projects
at other Fairview hospitals in Burnsville, Princeton and Wyoming, Minnesota and refund the
1997 and 2000 bonds of the Minnesota Agricultural and Economic Board. The 1997 and 2000
bonds financed improvements at other Fairview hospitals in addition to Fairview Southdale
Hospital. Approximately $35,000,000 of the principal amount of the bonds would be used to
finance the proposed remodeling to be undertaken at Fairview Southdale Hospital.
The debt service on the bonds will be payable solely from payments to be made by
Fairview, and the City will not have any liability with respect to the bonds and will not be
required to enter into any agreements with respect to the bonds. Fairview will pay all City
expenses with respect to the bonds. A representative from Fairview will be in attendance at the
April 5th meeting to respond to any questions.
Following the public hearing the City Council wishes to approve the issuance of the
bonds by the City of Minneapolis it should adopt a resolution approving the issuance of the
bonds by the City of Minneapolis.
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
RESOLUTON NO. 2005-24
APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS BY THE CITY OF
MINNEAPOLIS ON BEHALF OF FAIRVIEW HEALTH
SERVICES UNDER THE MINNESOTA STATUTES,
SECTIONS 469.152 TO 469.165
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City
of Edina "), as follows:
SECTION 1
Recitals and Findings
1.1. This Council has received a proposal from Fairview Health Services, a
Minnesota nonprofit corporation ( "Fairview "), that the City of Edina authorize the City of
Minneapolis, Minnesota (the "City of Minneapolis ") to issue bonds under Minnesota Statutes,
Sections 469.152 through 469.165 (the "Act ") to finance the remodeling of portions of Fairview
Southdale Hospital in the City, and the acquisition and installation of items of equipment
therein (the "Project "), and to refund the Health Care System Revenue Bonds, Series 1997
(Fairview Hospital and Healthcare Services) and the Health Care System Revenue Bonds, Series
2000A . (Fairview Health Services) of the Minnesota Agricultural and Economic Development
Board (the "Refunding "), a portion of the proceeds of which were used finance improvements
to Fairview Southdale Hospital and the acquisition and installation of items of equipment
therein .
1.2. At a public hearing held on April 5, 2005, all parties who appeared at the
hearing were given an opportunity to express their views with respect to the proposal to finance
the Project and provide, for the Refunding through the issuance of revenue bonds under the Act
by the City of Minneapolis and interested persons•were given the opportunity to submit written
comments to the City Clerk before the time of the hearing.
SECTION 2
Approvals
2.1. The issuance of bonds by the City of Minneapolis, pursuant to the Act to
finance the Project and provide fro the Refunding, is hereby consented to and approved. The
terms of the bonds shall be as are approved by the Minneapolis City Council.
2.2. The Mayor and City Manager and other officers of the City of Edina are
authorized and directed to furnish to Fairview, the City of Minneapolis and the attorneys
.rendering an opinion on the issuance of the bonds, certified copies of all proceedings and
records of the City of Edina relating to the bonds and such other affidavits and certificates as
may be required to show the facts relating to the legality and marketability of the bonds as such
facts appear from the books and records in the officer's custody and control or as otherwise
known to them; and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any
heretofore furnished, shall constitute representations of the City of Edina as to the truth of all
statements contained therein.
Resolution No. 2005 -24
Page Two
Adopted this 5th day of April, 2005
Attest
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
James B. Hovland, Mayor
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify
that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly
adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of March 1, 2005, and as recorded in
the Minutes of said regular meeting.
WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this day of
2005.
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
OF THE EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 23,2005,7:00 PM
EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
4801 WEST 50TH STREET
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Chair David Byron, Michael Schroeder, Michael Fischer, John Lonsbury,
Helen McClelland, Stephen Brown, Floyd Grabiel
MEMBERS ABSENT:
David Runyan and Goof Workinger
STAFF PRESENT:
Kris Aaker and Jackie Hoogenakker
I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES:
The minutes of the January 26, 2005, meeting were filed as submitted.
II. NEW BUSINESS:
A-05 -1 Amendment to Zoning Ordinance
& C-05 -1 Conditional Use Permit
Haugland Companies
3901 -3907 50th Street West
5000 -5020 France Avenue South
Ms. Aaker informed the Commission the City is requesting an amendment
to the zoning ordinance and Haugland Companies is requesting a Conditional
Use Permit to allow redevelopment on the corner of West 50th Street and France
Avenue. Ms. Aaker said the proposal includes a mix of residential and retail and
would be developed in phases. The proposed residential uses would need to
comply with the standards for the district, but would be exempt from the floor
area limit. The residential use would also need to provide private parking to
support the project.
Mr. Aaker concluded staff recommends preliminary approval of an
amendment to the zoning ordinance and preliminary approval of a Conditional
Use Permit for the proposed project subject to the satisfaction of the following
conditions: final adoption of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment, approval of
Conditional Use Permit for dwelling units, easements as required for building and
public utilities and Watershed District Permits.
Mr. Gene Haugland, applicant and Mr. J. Benshoof and Mr. Dan Young -
Dixon were present to respond to questions.
Commissioner Fischer commented in reviewing the plans it appears "air
rights" will need to be readdressed. Ms. Aaker responded that is correct. She
stated "air and subterranean rights" need to be addressed, and resolved.
Chair Byron referred to a letter from Mr. Richard Curtin (owner of the
adjacent Ampersand building) and asked Ms. Aaker if the proponent had the
opportunity to review Mr. Curtin's letter. Ms. Aaker responded Mr. Haugland was
provided with a copy of the letter and if she understood correctly Mr. Haugland
personally met with Mr. Curtin.
Mr. Haugland addressed the Commission and informed them he has
owned Arby's since 1984. Continuing, and with the aid of photo's Mr. Haugland
explained his goal is to redevelop two parcels at the corner of West 50th Street
and France Avenue. Mr. Haugland said he proposes to replace the current
13,400 square feet of retail space (including Arby's) with 22,500 square feet of
new retail space. He added the proposed retail space is all at ground level.
Continuing, Mr. Haugland said one thing he believes is important to the project is
to widen the sidewalk along France Avenue. He added this proposal would widen
the France Avenue sidewalk roughly three additional feet.
Mr. Haugland reported another feature in the redevelopment of this area
includes constructing 23 condominium units on three levels above the new retail
space. Mr. Haugland said parking for condominium owners would be
accommodated in a below grade parking garage.
Continuing, Mr. Haugland explained to the Commission the project will be
constructed in two phases. The first phase would consist of razing Arby's and
construction of retail (street level 8,500 square feet) with condo's above. Mr.
Haugland said he believes this "phased approach" would reduce disruption for
our retail tenants. The second phase consists of razing the remaining retail and
constructing new retail with condo units above. Mr. Haugland told the
Commission some issues regarding air and subterreran rights are still "up in the
2
air' and it is believed some slight adjustments need to be made. Adjustments
also may need to be made concerning the alley and egress /ingress.
Chair Byron commented in reviewing the plans it appeared to him the
condominiums are setback from the first level retail space.
Mr. Young Dixon addressed the Commission and told Chair Byron he is
exactly correct in his observation. Mr. Dixon said the residential feature of the
development is stepped back significantly offering dimension to the architecture.
Mr. Dixon said all units will have an outdoor deck area, however the designed
increased setback of the residential units create an outdoor living area that
prevents residents from "hanging" over their railing viewing the pedestrians on
France Avenue or West 50th Street. Mr. Dixon said this stepped back design
feature is especially important on the second level for not only aesthetic reasons
but also for safety. Continuing, Mr. Dixon said another feature of the design is to
maintain the feel of the France Ave /50th retail stores. Mr. Dixon said careful
attention was made to the retail element of the proposal to include a variety of
storefronts for an individual city look to the project.
Commissioner McClelland asked after Arby's is razed how will the retail
elements be incorporated into the new. Mr. Haugland responded as he
mentioned previously this proposal will be constructed in phases. He explained
the plan is to raze Arby's, begin construction of the new retail /condo's with
merchants vacating existing retail and moving into the new spaces before Phase
2 begins.
Mr. Benshoof addressed the Commission and explained the traffic study
for the redevelopment at 50th Street and France Avenue. Mr. Benshoof said the
plan before the Commission this evening removes the existing entrance driveway
on France Avenue and retains the existing exit driveway. The development
would be served by the existing exit drive and the existing one -way northbound
alley connecting to 51 st street, and a new connection to the parking ramp
opposite the entrance to the underground parking garage for residents of the
condos. Mr. Benshoof explained gates would restrict the connection to the
paring ramp with access through this connection only available for residents of
the condos. Mr. Benshoof said it is believed the current redevelopment plan
would generate fewer trips compared to existing uses and would also generate
fewer trips if the alternative development scenario were implemented (50th and
France Avenue plan).
Commissioner Grabiel asked Mr. Benshoof what would prevent the condo
residents from using the alley. Mr. Benshoof said he believes the turning radius
may prevent that.
Mr. Dick Curtin, 6310 McIntyre, and property owner of the Ampersand
building told the Commission he is not opposed to the project but wants the City
3
to carefully examine the proposed development. Mr. Curtin said he has a
concern with regard to providing adequate parking, the turn radius and traffic.
Mr. Curtin added he is not sure he believes access to the residential element of
the proposal is best. Continuing, Mr. Curtin pointed out the layout of the
development also appears to convert his sidewalk (north side) to a thoroughfare.
He added that sidewalk is maintained by him, and if in the future it is used by
residents of the proposed condos who will maintain that sidewalk and what about
liability.
Chairman Byron asked Mr. Curtin if he believes there is a better
alternative to the plans submitted. Mr. Curtin said his first thought was to enter
from France Avenue. Commissioner McClelland questioned if that would create
a curb cut/sight distance problem.
Chair Byron asked Mr. Haugland if he has any response to Mr. Curtin. Mr.
Haugland said they could look into the suggestion by Mr. Curtin with regard to
France Avenue access, but his first impression is that that would be more
dangerous. Mr. Haugland in response to the question regarding the north
walkway that they intend to add "Arby's" land to widen it. Mr. Haugland said he
has met with Mr. Curtin and is aware of his concerns and will try to address them.
Commissioner Losnbury questioned Mr. Benshoof on what he believes is
the best access scenario. Mr. Benshoof stated in his opinion the plan presented
is best. Commissioner Losnbury asked Mr. Benshoof if another study should be
done to determine which approach is best.
Mr. Curtin pointed out this proposal is still in preliminary stages with
nothing "cast in stone" and told the Commission he still is persuaded parking will
not be adequate especially as it relates to guest parking adding Mr. Haugland
can also look at different access points.
Commissioner Brown asked how often a parking study has been
conducted on the ramps. Ms. Aaker told the Commission Planning Staff has
conducted a number of parking studies over the years. She added she believes
the last study was conducted when renovations were made to the Edina theatre
and other retail areas.
Mr. Martin Labelle, addressed the Commission and informed them he is a
barber in Edina at the northwest intersection of France Avenue and 50th Street.
Mr. Labelle said he has a real concern with regard to parking and told the
Commission his clients already struggle to find adequate parking spaces. Mr.
Labelle questioned if approved as presented where would the retail tenants
park? He pointed out street parking on France Avenue is already limited. He
stated in his experience the north ramp is heavily used and it isn't uncommon for
clients to have to park on the Minneapolis side of the street.
4
Mr. Hosmar Brown, property owner in the area told the Commission he
believes the proposal is good and the building is beautiful, but there are bigger
issues at work here. He pointed out the 50th and France Avenue retail area used
to be a quaint area that now has become an intersection. He said in his
experience traffic in this area is already terrible and won't get any better. Mr.
Brown said the proposed increase in density can only add to an already difficult
traffic situation. Mr. Brown pointed out at 3PM traffic already begins piling up.
Mr. Brown acknowledged the ramps are not always full but if the proposed plan
eliminates any spaces that presents a problem. Mr. Brown said in his opinion
more retail space isn't needed if parking spaces will be decreased, even by a
few.
Commissioner McClelland commented in her opinion the traffic situation
isn't a new problem, and it is possible with better intersection control traffic could
be calmed.
Mr. Haugland told the Commission he is willing to look into some of the
issues pointed out this evening, but informed the Commission there are not a lot
of choices available to them. Mr. Haugland said one element that hasn't been
mentioned is that Minneapolis doesn't have the ability to provide adequate
parking to accommodate their retail and much of their parking needs are met in
the City's municipal ramps. Mr. Haugland acknowledged there are a lot of cross
over clients between the two cities, but it is a challenge for our side of the street.
Mr. Haugland stated he continues to believe pedestrian flow should be
encouraged between cities in a safe fashion, noting the parking is what it is.
Commissioner Schroeder said if he assumes correctly that the parking
plan contained in the 50th and France Avenue plan was based on total build -out,
which includes redevelopment of this corner. Ms. Aaker responded that is
correct. Continuing, Mr. Schroeder said if he understands correctly this plan
proposes a reduction of 3 or 4 parking spaces. Ms. Aaker answered that is
correct, but pointed out the City's ramps have increased in parking capacity since
that plan was drafted. Commissioner Schroeder commented as he views it any
parking shortage should not be attributed to this project. He pointed out parking
demand and in and outs could be greatly increased if, lets say a Culver's fast -
food restaurant would replace Arby's. Ms. Aaker agreed, the 50th and France
Avenue plan did include an increase in retail space.
Commissioner Fischer asked Ms. Aaker if the City of Minneapolis and
Edina communicate. Ms. Aaker responded the City of Minneapolis sends the
City of Edina notice of upcoming developments and we do the same.
Commissioner Fischer said in his opinion since the 50th and France
Avenue plan was designed to include retail build -out the residential aspect of this
proposal could be considered an improvement with regard to parking.
Commissioner McClelland said agrees with that observation.
5
Commissioner Lonsbury commented it is true a residential element could
be considered an improvement, but in his opinion there 'have been a lot of
assumptions made with regard to the City's parking ramps and their capacity.
Commissioner Brown asked Ms. Aaker if she knows the total parking
capacity for the City's ramps. Ms. Aaker responded she believes there were 889
parking spaces located in the ramps prior to the expansion of the north ramp.
She pointed out this of course does not include on street parking spaces.
Commissioner Brown said that while he has great respect for the developer and
believes he will do an excellent job he is concerned the City is working from a
plan developed in the 1970's.
Chair Byron asked Ms. Aaker if the cost was shared between the City and
the retail property owners when the ramps were constructed and added on -to.
Ms. Aaker responded that is correct. It was a joint venture. Commissioner
Grabiel added that at least from his experience, he has always found parking
availability in the ramps.
Ms. Aaker reiterated Planning Staff took ramp counts a number of times,
adding the counts were not prefect but staff findings indicated that usually vacant
parking spaces were found on the tops of the ramps. The overall capacity
averages during "peak" times were between 65 and 75 percent with 92% percent
occupancy during the holidays.
Commissioner Schroeder commented while reviewing the plans if it would
be possible to move the trash storage area. Mr. Haugland responded in his
opinion he doesn't believe that is possible because of the existing City
easements. He pointed out that trash area is used by a number of tenants.
A discussion ensued between Commission Members with regard to issues
on residential parking needs and if it would be possible to allow an area in the
ramp for overnight guest or owner parking. It was suggested that some form of
sticker be used to identify those vehicles. The discussion continued with
Commission Members questioning how the voting should proceed. Should the
requested ordinance amendment be handled separately or handled along with
the requested Conditional Use Permit.
Chair Byron said in his opinion there is no reason to "do one without the
other'. He pointed out this is a project driven amendment to the zoning
ordinance, we all know that, adding he has no problem handling them separately,
but both should be acted on. Chair Byron said if handled separately the next
question could be do we or do we not proceed on the specific proposal by Mr.
Haugland.
D
Commissioner Losnbury moved to recommend an amendment to the
zoning ordinance adding residential dwelling units as a conditional use in
the PCD 1,2, and 3 Districts. Commissioner McClelland seconded the
motion. Commissioner Lonsbury stated he believes this is an appropriate action
to take and directed attention to #3 of the proposed ordinance amendment.
Commissioner Lonsbury said he would like to amend the proposed standards for
residential dwelling units to read: "Dwelling units with a floor area of 1,500 feet or
less shall provide a minimum of 1.75 fully enclosed parking spaces per unit.
Dwelling units exceeding 1,500 square feet shall provide a minimum of 2.5 fully
enclosed parking spaces per unit. Commissioner Lonsbury explained his reason
for the increase is to ensure adequate parking spaces, especially as it relates to
guest parking. Commissioner McClelland said she has to withdraw her
second, adding she is uncomfortable with those figures. Commissioner
Brown seconded Commissioners Lonsbury's motion for purpose of
discussion. Commissioner McClelland stated that while she can agree guest
parking is a concern she has difficulty requiring multi - residential facilities to
exceed the parking standards required for R -1 properties in the City of Edina.
Commissioner Lonsbury stated the Commission is recommending a change to
the zoning ordinance, pointing out most R -1 properties in Edina have garages,
driveways and access to street parking, which in total is more than 2 parking
spaces per dwelling. Commissioner Lonsbury pointed out, at least in this
situation, street parking is mostly unheard of.
Commissioner Schroeder questioned Commissioner Lonsbury's language
statement of fully enclosed parking spaces and inquired if part of the ratio could
include unenclosed parking spaces. Commissioner Lonsbury said he has no
problem with that suggestion, adding he amends his motion to read - for
units over 1,500 square feet 2 fully enclosed spaces and % unenclosed
parking spaces are required. For units under 1,500 square feet 1.5 fully
enclosed spaces and' /4- unenclosed spaces are required. Commissioner
McClelland stated she still has a problem with that ratio, pointing out the public
ramp can be used to accommodate guest parking, etc.
Commissioner Grabiel pointed out the proposed changes to the motion
would at least at this point scratch this proposal. Commissioner Lonsbury
stressed that is not his intent. He stated an amendment to the ordinance is
requested and he is addressing by his motion only the proposed changes to the
ordinance not the project. Commissioner Lonsbury stated in his opinion the
redevelopment proposal before the Commission this evening is a good proposal
and if approved the proposed changes to the ordinance amendment would allow
the proponents the opportunity to redevelop with variances
Chairman Byron said for clarification unless the first motion is amended
what is on the table is a motion and a second to amend the ordinance to read —
for units over 1,500 square feet 2.5 fully enclosed spaces and for units under
7
1.500 square foot 1.75 fully enclosed spaces. Commissioner Lonsbury withdrew
that motion.
Commissioner Brown moved to recommend adding residential
dwelling units as a conditional use in the PCD -1, 2, and 3 Districts and
standards for residential dwelling units # 3 to read. Dwelling units with a
floor area of 1,500 square feet or less shall provide a minimum of 1.5 fully
enclosed parking spaces per unit and' /4 unenclosed parking spaces per
unit. Dwelling units exceeding 1,500 square feet shall provide a minimum
of 2.0 fully enclosed parking spaces- per unit and ' /z unenclosed parking
spaces per unit. Commissioner Lonsbury seconded the motion.
Commissioner Brown added his intent is to amend the amended ordinance_ ; and
in no way is it directed at this project.
Commissioner Grabiel reiterated if the motion before us is adopted what
does that do to this proposal. Chair Bryon responded he is not sure and
directed that question to Mr. Haugland. Mr. Haugland stated he doesn't believe
it is fair to respond to that question. He said in all good faith they can't supply the
parking. He pointed out the fully enclosed parking could possibly be met but the
unenclosed parking would be impossible to meet.
Commissioner Lonsbury said the proposed motion to amend the
ordinance doesn't take into consideration the proposal before the Commission
this evening or for that matter any future proposals. He added as a city looking
,at redevelopment he believes it is important that adequate parking is provided,
and his intent by this motion is limited to the ordinance amendment. Mr.
Haugland said he has no response to the proposed changes to the amendment
to the ordinance as stipulated by Commissioners Brown and Lonsbury.
Commissioner Byron said if he understands correctly, if adopted, absent
the ability of this proposal to obtain variances to comply with the proposed
amendment, what is dictated would be required. Mr. Haugland responded the
development team would have to go back and re -visit the proposal and look into
the possibility of eliminating one floor. Mr. Haugland said he believes in all
confidence that won't occur and he would construct all commercial as dictated by
the adopted 50th & France commercial area plan.
Commissioner Fischer said being new to the Commission he was
somewhat surprised Edina had an ordinance prohibiting the mix of commercial
with residential. Commissioner Fischer said in his opinion the parking
requirements are and should be different in different zones of the city. He said
the beauty of mixed use is that guests may arrive at hours businesses are not
operating thereby avoiding congestion. Commissioner Fischer added he has a
fear with the parking numbers suggested that no development or redevelopment
for that matter could achieve those standards. He pointed out Edina is no longer
LV
green fields. Commissioner Fischer concluded he may be wrong, but his intuition
tells him those numbers are too high, acknowledging he can't tell you that
factually.
Commissioner Schroeder echoed Commissioner Fischer's comments and
stated in his experience the figures Commissioners Lonsbury and Brown are
proposing are significantly higher then what most cities are looking at in terms of
redevelopment. Commissioner Schroeder pointed out if parking ratios change as
recommended this is not the only area in Edina that would have to follow those
guidelines. He pointed out Edina is continually looking for opportunities to
provide affordable housing He pointed out if burdened with unnecessarily high
parking ratios that may limit the ability of the city to redevelop other commercial
areas where the square footage of the housing units and price are less then what
is proposed this evening. Commissioner Schroeder said it is entirely possible
Edinborough would not have been able to be developed under the requirements
proposed by Commissioners Brown and Lonsbury.
Mr. Haugland told the Commission Mr. Benshoof has been working with
developers on two projects in downtown Minneapolis and asked the Commission
if they would like to hear how the parking was handled in those instances.
Mr. Benshoof addressed the Commission and explained at present he is
working with developers on two high rise towers in downtown Minneapolis. Mr.
Benshoof explained one project is complete "Grand Park ", and the "Carlyle"
proposed along the river near the Post Office is not complete. At Grand Park
parking requirements are 1.35 spaces per unit regardless of unit size. Mr.
Benshoof said the reason the parking requirement of 1.35 is due to the proximity
of the development to downtown. It is believed for both projects that residents
are people that won't require two vehicles. Many are move down buyers who
consolidate to one car and address most of their needs locally on foot. Mr.
Benshoof added at the Grand extra parking stalls are available. Mr. Benshoof
said the Carlyle requires a larger parking ratio of 1.45 stalls per unit with the
same concept - parking is based on unit numbers not size. Concluding, Mr.
Benshoof reported he is finishing a project in Maple Grove with a parking
requirement of 2 spaces per unit. It is felt in Maple Grove extra parking could be
accommodated on the street. Maple Grove also has an ordinance that prohibits
on street parking after midnight. Mr. Benshoof stated in his opinion the
recommended parking ratio is high, especially for urban infill projects.
Commissioner Fisher cautioned against using this project to solve an
existing parking problem. He said in his opinion the recommended 2.5 parking
stalls (no matter the scale of the project) is the largest he has ever seen in terms
of redevelopment. Commissioner Fischer added, and he may be wrong, that
many of the perspective buyers will probably be "move down" from within the
community that will embrace the near amenities.
0
Chair Byron called for a vote on the amendment to the zoning
ordinance. Nays, Schroeder, Fischer, McClelland, Grabiel, Byron. Ayes,
Lonsbury, Brown. Motion failed.
Commissioner Grabiel moved to recommend an amendment to the
ordinance adding residential dwelling units as a conditional use in the
PCD -1, 2, and 3 districts as indicated by staff. Commissioner Fisher
seconded the motion. Ayes; Schroeder, Fischer, McClelland, Grabiel and
Byron. Nays, Brown, Lonsbury. Motion carried.
Chair Byron said Haugland Companies is before the Commission
requesting a Conditional Use Permit and if no further discussion called for a
motion.
Commissioner Grabiel moved to recommend Conditional Use Permit
approval subject to final adoption of an Amendment to the Zoning
Ordinance, easements as required for building and public utilities and
Watershed District Permit(s). Commissioner Fischer seconded the motion.
Commissioner. McClelland said that while she is in support of the proposal she is
hesitant to vote on this motion. She added, at least in her opinion, there are still
some unanswered questions especially concerning the air and subterranean
rights, exit on /off France Avenue and garbage /recycling placement.
Commissioner McClelland stated she believes this is a great redevelopment of
the coiner reiterating she is still hesitant and suggested continuing the hearing
until some of issues are better addressed.
Commissioner Fischer questioned if this is the only time the Commission
as a body will hear this proposal.
Chair Byron responded if he understands correctly staff recommends
preliminary approval of the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance and preliminary
approval of the Conditional Use Permit, which indicates this will return to the
Commission when everything or nearly everything is in its final form.
Commissioner Lonsbury added he agrees with that interpretation.
Commissioner Fisher said in his opinion a continuance at this time
probably wouldn't change things in the preliminary stages. He added he agrees
there are "loose ends" remaining but believes the proponent will resolve those
issues. Continuing, Commissioner Fischer pointed out there is always the
possibility that tomorrow a similar project could be proposed on the Minneapolis
side of France Avenue without any input from the City. He added it is in our favor
at this time that the review and approval process is in the hands of the City of
Edina. Continuing, Commission Fischer said with all do respect to the business
owners regarding parking, that he has never met a business owner that believe
they have enough parking and he would be disappointed if business owners said
they have enough parking. Commissioner Fischer pointed out in viewing the two
10
aerial photos the top decks of the ramps appear empty. He added he believes
there is enough parking to support this project acknowledging that not all spaces
could be considered convenient. Concluding, Commissioner Fischer said at this
time he believes the submitted proposal is well done and designed with careful
consideration. He stated he does not believe there are any reasons to delay this
project.
Mr. Haugland said, as he understood from planning staff a final plan would
need to be presented to the Commission and Council. Mr. Haugland apologized
to the Commission for bringing up a number of issues in the preliminary stages
that probably shouldn't have been brought up until they were resolved. He added
he believes the air and subterranean easements will soon be resolved.
Chair Byron told the Commission he has been relatively slow in his own
mind in appreciating the mixed -use concept. He added he now better
understands the point often made that mixed use is a way to reduce density by
mixing uses resulting in a positive impact on traffic and parking while at the same
time allowing a property owner the ability to improve their property. Continuing,
Chair Byron commented from the discussion this evening and in viewing projects
in other communities that a proposal such as this appears to be very attractive to
many people. Chair Byron commented when he received his packet containing
the request for an amendment change and conditional use permit the first thing
he did was drive France Avenue focusing on the southwest corner. Chair Byron
added he was struck by the impression that this corner is crying out for
redevelopment. He pointed out the age of the structures create the need for
change. Chair Byron said the renovation on the Minneapolis (Pinehurst) side of
the street appears to be generating redevelopment, which may continue along
both sides of France in the future. Chair Byron agreed with observations on
traffic congestion and wouldn't consider minimizing the present traffic situation
but believes if done correctly this proposal should not exacerbate traffic or
parking. Concluding Chair Byron said he supports the proposal.
Chair Byron called for the vote recommending approval of a
conditional use permit subject to staff conditions: Ayes; Schroeder,
Fischer, Grabiel, Brown Lonsbury, Byron. Abstain, McClelland. Motion
carried.
11
LD -05 -1 Lot Division
6920 Hillside Lane
5524 West 70th Street
Ms. Aaker informed the Commission the applicant proposes to transfer a
strip of land measuring approximately 5 feet by 124 feet from the lot on Hillside
Lane to the rear of the lot at 5524 West 70th Street.
Ms. Aaker concluded the proposed lot division would cure the
encroachment of a brick patio and shed of the 70th Street house on the property
of the house on Hillside Lane.
Commissioner McClelland moved to recommend lot division approval.
Commissioner Fischer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried.
Ill. ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting adjourned at 10:00 PM
Jackie Hoogenakker
12
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
OF THE EDINA ZONING BOARD
THUESDAY, NOVEMBER 18,2004,5:30 PM
EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
4801 WEST 50TH STREET
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Chair Goof Workinger, Mike.Lewis, Edward Schwartzbauer and Rodney
Hardy
MEMBERS ABSENT:
William Skallerud
STAFF PRESENT:
Kris Aaker and Jackie Hoogenakker
I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES:
The minutes of the September 16, 2004 meeting were filed as submitted.
II. NEW BUSINESS:
B -04-60 Todd and Linda Watchmaker
4527 Bruce Ave.
Lot 18, Block 3, Country Club District
Request: A 2.25 ft side yard setback variance
Ms. Aaker informed the Board the subject property is located on the east
side of Bruce Ave. consisting of a two -story Mediterranean style home with a
detached two -car garage. The homeowners are hoping to remove a one -story
addition off of the back of the home and replace it with a two -story addition. The
addition will extend into the rear yard 5 ft beyond where the existing back wall of
the home is currently located. The first floor will include a new mudroom and
family room. The second floor will include a bedroom and office nook addition.
The finished materials will match the existing (stucco).
Ms. Aaker concluded the homeowner is hoping to correct mold and rot
problems along the backside of the home and in so doing hoping to add onto the
home and maintain the existing nonconforming setback. Given the slight addition
to the building footprint and continuation of the existing setback, impact would be
minimal on neighboring property.
Mr. Bruce Most, contractor was present to respond to questions.
Ms. Smith, 4521 Bruce Avenue, told the Board too much construction has
been occurring along her block and her home has suffered structural damage as
a result of neighboring construction projects (directly adjacent). Mr. Lewis
addressed Ms. Smith and informed her she should talk with the homeowner(s) or
their contractor if her home suffered any damage as a result of the continuing
construction. Mr. Hardy interjected and explained to Ms. Smith this is not the
correct forum to address her concerns. He suggested speaking (if all else fails)
with building department officials informing them of her continued problems.
Chair Workinger agreed and told Ms. Smith she can also contact the City
Manager if problems continue to arise.
A discussion ensued with board members in agreement the proposed
addition to the home is modest in scope and scale and should not adversely
impact the neighborhood, adding they support the request as submitted.
Mr. Lewis moved variance approval subject to the plans presented and the
use. of matching materials noting the non - conforminity of the house. Mr. Hardy
seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried.
B -04-61 Brent and Becky Hollenkamp
5813 St. Johns Ave.
Lot 21, Block 6, Fairfax Addition
Request: A 5 ft front yard setback variance
Ms. Aaker informed the board the subject property is located on the east
side of St. Johns consisting of a 1 Y2 -story home. The property owner is hoping to
add a 5 x 7 ft addition to the front of the house to provide an enclosed front entry.
The Zoning Ordinance requires that the proposed addition conform to the front
yard setback requirement, which is established by averaging the front yard
setbacks along the block between intersections or by matching the setbacks of
the neighboring homes. All of the homes along the block are located 35 ft to the
front lot line. The variance would allow a 30 ft front yard setback for the home.
Ms. Aaker concluded the entryway is a small addition to a home with
limited space and opportunity for a family dinning area. The design of the
addition blends architecturally with the home and would not be intrusive or
offensive to the block or the neighborhood. Staff supports the request subject to
the plans presented.
N
The proponents, Mr. and Mrs. Hollenkamp were present to respond to
questions.
Chair Workinger asked Ms. Aaker if the addition were entirely unenclosed
would it require a variance. Ms. Aaker responded if entirely unenclosed it would
not require a variance, however, the closet and entry area is enclosed so the
need for a variance arose. She explained the ordinance was changed last year
to allow residents to achieve a front "unenclosed" entry not to exceed 80 square
feet and be no closer than 20 feet to the front property line. Ms. Aaker said in her
experience most stoops are roughly 50 square feet plus which is the reasoning
behind the 80 square foot limit. Reiterating Ms. Aaker stated because of the
enclosed nature of the front entry addition the need for a variance was triggered.
Mr. Schwartzbauer moved variance approval subject to the plans
presented. Mr. Lewis seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried.
B -04-62 Barbra Osadcky
4378 Brook Ave.
Lot 8, Block 8, Browndale Park
Request: A 31/2 inch side yard setback variance for
a room addition
Ms. Aaker reported the subject property is located on the west side of
Brook Ave. consisting of a one and one half story home. The homeowner is
hoping add onto the back of the home to include an expanded master bedroom
and family room. The homeowner's contractor applied for a building permit and
upon having a survey done it was found that the south wall of the home is
located 9.7 ft to the side lot line. The minimum side yard setback for properties
that have lot widths of 75 ft or greater is 10 ft. Lots less than 75 ft in width are
allowed a 5 ft side yard setback. The subject lot is exactly 75 ft in width so a 10 ft
side yard setback is required.
The house was built slightly nonconforming and could have been a field
error during construction. The addition will be a dramatic improvement to the
home and will not compromise the ordinance or negatively impact adjacent
property.
Ms. Aaker concluded the request is very slight and is to continue an
existing nonconforming setback. Staff supports the request subject to the plans
presented.
3
The proponent Ms. Osadcky was present to respond to questions.
After a brief discussion Mr. Lewis moved variance approval subject to the
plans presented and the use of like materials, noting the existing non -
conforminity of the house. Mr. Schwartzbauer seconded the motion. All voted
aye; motion carried.
B -04-63 William and Lori Skallerud
5820 Northwood Drive
Lot 14, Block 2, Mirror Lake Edina
Request: A 6 ft front yard setback variance to
Locate a new house matching the existing
Front yard setback.
Ms. Aaker informed the board the subject property is located on the north
side of Northwood Drive consisting of a rambler with an attached garage. The lot
backs up to Interlachen golf course. The property owners intend to remove the
existing home and rebuild on the lot. The existing front yard setback of the home
is 56 ft. The homeowner is hoping to rebuild on the property while maintaining
the existing 56 ft front yard setback. The existing home is nonconforming
regarding front yard setback. The existing home is 6 ft forward of the established
front yard setback.
Ms. Aaker explained generally city staff and the Zoning Board have
appreciated the historical context of an existing front yard setback. In that regard
the existing home has enjoyed a 56ft front yard setback since the time of it's
construction with the existing setback not adversely affecting the neighboring
properties or the neighborhood in general. The Zoning Board has approved
variances in the past to maintain existing front yard setbacks given that it is a
property right that has always been enjoyed in the past. The Zoning Board is
protective of maintaining setback, however, has not generally been supportive of
allowing a new home closer than the established setback of the original home.
The proposal is to maintain the existing setback of the house with some portions
of the house farther from the front lot line than the existing home. In no areas will
the home be forward of the existing front yard setback of the home currently
occupying the property.
Ms. Aaker concluded staff supports the request given that the existing
home has always historically enjoyed the proposed setback and given that a
deeper setback may be more impacting on the adjacent property to the east.
4
The proponent, Mr. William Skallerud was present to respond to
questions.
Mr. Skallerud informed board members he spoke with immediate
neighbors with no issues raised.
Mr. Hardy said if he understands correctly the new house will maintain the
same front yard setback as the existing house did. Ms. Aaker responded that is
correct
Mr. Hardy moved approval of a 6 -foot front yard setback variance, noting
the new home will enjoy the same setback as the existing home and that
deepening the setback may result in a negative impact on adjoining properties.
Mr. Lewis seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried.
Ill. ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting adjourned at 6:10 PM
Jackie Hoogenakker
5
1'
EDINA COMMUNITY HEALTH COMMITTEE MEETING
Tuesday, December 7, 2004
Community Room City Hall
MEMBERS PRESENT: Lynn Moline, Bill Alldredge, Brad Montgomery, Tolu
Oyelowo, Idelle Longman
MEMBERS ABSENT: Richard Olson, Debbie Cook, and Spencer Anderson
OTHERS PRESENT: Roz Johnson, Bloomington Public Health
STAFF PRESENT: Solvei Wilmot
ROLL CALL
The meeting was called to order at 7:10 p.m.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A correction was made to the Minutes of the September 21, 2004 meeting. A date
reference was incorrect.
Ms. Moline, MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 21, 2004,
MEETING AS CORRECTED. Mr. Montgomery SECONDED. MOTION CARRIED.
TOBACCO UPDATE
Ms. Johnson distributed an update on Hennepin County's Ordinance #24. This is a no
smoking Ordinance that will go into effect on March 31, 2005. It will impact all
establishments that serve food.
Ms. Johnson reported that she has been in meetings with Minneapolis, Bloomington,
Richfield and Edina to work on educational information regarding the smoking ban and
to track if the smoking ban has a financial impact. MPAT, Minnesota Partnership
Against Tobacco will help fund the education portion. MPAT is also looking at
economic impact, change in public opinion, smoking cessation and air quality.
Ms. Johnson presented an example of signage for establishments. The signs will have the
local enforcement agency phone number. The signs will be posted in March.
A member inquired when Bloomington's smoking ban starts. Ms. Johnson commented
that their ban starts March 31 also.
PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
Ms. Johnson presented information on Public Health Emergency Preparedness (PHEP).
Which is preparing for and responding to bioterrorism, emerging infectious disease
outbreaks and other public health threats and emergencies.
A part of PHEP is an Emergency and Risk Communication plan. The plan outlines the
people who should be contacted should there be a major emergency event. One of the
communication forms that has been established is the Health Alert Network. Health
information is distributed either by e-mail or FAX pertinent health professionals.
Television is also being used to quickly notify special and limited English populations
through Twin Cities Public Television's ECHO (Emergency & Community Health
Outreach) program.
Ms. Johnson commented about the Medical Reserve Corp. This is a statewide program
that is seeking medical personnel that would be available to assist during a major health
event. More information. is available at Hennepin County's website: www.mrc-
hennepin.org
Commission members suggested getting information to the Minnesota Medical
Association about the Medical Reserve Corp.
Ms. Johnson commented that some police departments have Citizens Emergency
Response Training (CERT) which is a program for citizens to volunteer and prepare for
emergency readiness.
A member inquired about flu shot vaccine security. Ms. Johnson.'said that is something
the State has been looking into.
STATE COMMUNITY HEALTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE ( SCHAC) UPDATE
Ms. Wilmot commented that at the September meeting the SCHAC committee presented
information regarding formula change for funding distribution. The potential change
could reduce the amount Edina receives from the State grant. However, more discussion
is pending.
Ms. Longman I commented there was. information regarding emergency preparedness,
food allergies, teen pregnancy, and early intervention with emotion behavior disorders.
Ms. Longman commented about being able to speak with Commissioner Diane
Mandernach one on one at the conference.
The Keynote speaker was Janet Porter regarding "The Power of One ". She had a very
effective and good presentation regarding an individual's ability to effect a change.
OTHER BUSINESS
Tri -City Steering Committee
Ms. Longman commented that committee members are invited to attended Tri -City
Steering Committee meetings. It consists of members from Richfield, Edina and
Bloomington focused on prevention, education, and health promotion issues. The
meetings are quarterly, 3:30 — 5:30 p.m.
Edina Community Health Committee 2005 Meetings.
The committee agreed on the meeting dates of March 17, May 17, September 20 and
November 15.
Human Rights and Relations Committee
Ms. Longman reported that the Human Rights and Relations Committee hosted an
Intergenerational Dialogue on October 2. Sixty people participated and had good
feedback.
The Human Rights and Relations Committee has a subcommittee on Bullying, members
are invited to participate. Let Ms. Longman know if you are interested.
Home Health Services and Contract with Bloomington Public Health
Ms. Wilmot commented that Bloomington Public Health provide home health nursing
services to Edina residents through a contract. Bloomington Public Health is no longer
providing that service due to budget cutting issues and because that service is available
from private businesses. Members inquired how many residents received the service in
the past year. Ms. Wilmot commented that the nursing program had seen twenty
residents; seven were on a consistent need. Eighteen of those residents would be able to
receive service from a private nursing service and two would need financial assistant in
order to receive nursing service. A member inquired about the contract. Ms. Wilmot
stated that approximately forty percent of the contract is for Home Health Services,
which is the category that the nursing services are under.
Members discussed the limited number of residents that the program served and the high
cost of the program. Consideration to enhancing senior programs was made. It was
decided to look at the priority list that has previously been developed and consider the
options.
ADJOURNMENT
Ms. Moline MOTIONED TO AJOURN. Mr. Montgomery SECONDED. MEETING
ADJOURNED 8:50 p.m.
MINUTES
FEBRUARY 16, 2005
EDINA RECYCLING AND SOLID WASTE COMMISSION
COMMUNITY CONFERENCE ROOM
MEMBERS PRESENT: Bill Bryan, Inna Hays and Mariko "Marley" Hanson
MEMBERS ABSENT: Kathy Frey, Anne Cronin and Tim Brownell
GUEST: Rich Hirstein, BFI
STAFF PRESENT: Solvei Wilmot, Recycling Coordinator
ROLL CALL
Bill Bryan, Chair, called the meeting to order at 7:10 a.m.
MINUTES
Corrections were made to the January 19, 2005 minutes. A correction to the Motion was
made. Mr. Bryan MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES AS CORRECTED FROM THE
JANUARY 19, 2005. Inna Hays SECONDED. MOTION CARRIED.
RECYCLING IN SCHOOLS
Ms. Frey was preparing a report regarding recycling collection in the schools. Her report
will be presented at the next meeting. Ms. Hanson reported that most classrooms in the High
School have a container to collect paper. The plastic bottles are collected in the hallway.
Recycling participation could be better by the students. Ms. Hanson will look into having an
announcement made to the student body regarding recycling.
VOLUNTEER AWARDS
Ms. Wilmot inquired about any nominees for the Recycling Award. Ms. Hays has nominated
the Edina Park Plaza for their recycling. Members will discuss this at the next meeting.
BOARDS AND COMMISSION ANNUAL MEETING
Ms. Wilmot commented that the annual boards and commission meeting will be held
Tuesday, March 29, 2005, Centennial Lakes, 5:00 p.m. An invitation will be mailed from the
Edina City Council.
OTHER BUSINESS
National Recycling Coalition (NRC)
The NRC conference will be held in Minneapolis in August 28 -31, 2005. More information
will be coming regarding the conference.
Members discussed ways to promote recycling in schools. Mr. Hirstein commented that BFI
would be willing to assist with some promotional material.
Discussion regarding Earth Day.
ADJOURNMENT
Inna MOVED TO ADJOURN. Marley SECONDED. MOTION CARRIED.
7:55 A.M.
MllNICIPAL
LBGISLAM
League of Minnesota Cities Building
145 University Avenue West, Suite 450
St. Paul, MN 55103
Telephone: (651) 228 -9757
Facsimile: (651) 228 -9787
UPDATE 2005 -01
March 16, 2005
MLC OPPOSES GOVERNOR PAWLENTY'S MVHC CUTS
Governor Pawlenty has recommended extending the cuts in Market Value Homestead Credit (MVHC)
reimbursement for 103 cities in his biennial budget recommendation. In 2003, the legislature imposed
approximately $20 million in annual cuts to the MVHC reimbursement (mainly to those cities that received
little or no LGA) for two years. The MVHC reimbursement payments to those 103 cities was scheduled to
be restored beginning with taxes payable 2005. The Governor's bill (HF 660 Krinkie/ SF 753 Ortman)
proposes an extension of the cuts for two more years, which would save the state approximately $38
million over the biennium. The cut has a significant financial impact to the MLC communities, which stand
to loose approximately $20 million out of $38 million in statewide cuts. See chart below for specific MLC
city impact:
City
MVHC cut '04
Apple Valley
1,112,293
Bloomington
1,630,492
Burnsville
1,231,999
Eagan
1,153,562
Eden Prairie
763,466
Edina
452,522
Maple Grove
979,793
Maplewood
268,296
Minnetonka
706,708
Plymouth
689,350
Shoreview
428,437
Woodbury
857,007
Totals
10,273,926
MLC opposes MVHC reimbursement cuts to selected cities. However, if the legislature chooses to
implement the Governor's recommendations, at a minimum, we believe that cities should be removed from
the administration of the homestead credit.
Member Cities: Apple Valley, Bloomington, Burnsville, Eagan, Eden Prairie, Edina,
Maple Grove, Maplewood, Minnetonka, Plymouth, Shoreview, Woodbury
The MLC Update is prepared by Nilani Jayatilaka and Thomas J. Poul
Messerli & Kramer P.A., 145 University Avenue West, Suite 450, St. Paul, MN 55103
Telephone: 651.228.9757 Fax: 651.228.9787
E -mail: niavatilakawintandklaw.com and tpoul @mandklaw.com
MLC SUPPORTS CHANGING THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE
MARKET VALUE HOMESTEAD CREDIT
The MVHC is a statewide program for homeowner property tax relief. The state pays a portion of each
qualifying homeowner's property taxes up to a maximum of $304. The MVHC is not a payment to the
homeowner, but a reduction in the taxes paid by the homeowner and the credit amount is actually part of
the city's certified levy. The MVHC reimbursement does not reduce a city's levy like the LGA program.
When cities establish their budgets, they are unaware of the dollar amount of MVHC for which their city
homeowner may qualify. When the County Auditor calculates property tax statements for each homeowner,
the city's total levy is spread among all property types, but the homeowner's is reduced by an amount equal
to the city's proportional share of the qualifying amount of the homeowner's MVHC. The amount of
reduction of the homeowner's property taxes is then paid to the city by the State of Minnesota.
When the state fails to reimburse cities for their share of the MVHC, it is a direct loss to the city's budget.
The MLC believes that the state should. be. honest with the property tax payer. As a result, the MLC
supports legislation requiring MVHC reductions to a city be reflected on the homeowner's property tax
statement.
MLC SUPPORTS'S.F. 073 (BELANGER) /H.F. 851 (LENCZEWSKI):
FISCAL DISPARITIES STUDY
Senator Bill Belanger (R- Bloomington) and Representative Ann Lenczewski (DFL- Bloomington) have
introduced S.F. 073 /H.F. 851 the Metropolitan Area Fiscal Disparities. Program Study. The bill would
require legislative fiscal staff to conduct a study 'of the metropolitan revenue distribution (fiscal disparities)
program and report to the legislature by February 1, 2006 on findings and recommendations.
The study will primarily address the question of whether the program is achieving the purposes for which it
was created. Furthermore the study will try to address the following questions:
1) How has the program affected property tax disparities across the Twin Cities metropolitan
area?
2) Is the formula for contributing tax base to the area wide pool reasonable?
3) Is the formula for distributing tax base to the area wide pool reasonable?
4) Does the program help promote orderly growth and encourage environmentally sound land
use?
5) Does the program reduce competition for commercial - industrial tax base between
communities?
6) Do local governments derive sufficient tax revenues from commercial - industrial property to
cover the costs of providing services to the property, considering the tax base that must be
contributed to the area wide pool?
7) Could improvements be made to the administration of the program?
The MLC supports reexamining the fiscal disparities program.
Link to S.F. 073: http• / /www revisor leg state mn us /bin /bidbill php ?bill= S0073.0 &session =ls84
Link to H.F. 851: http://www.revisor leg.state.mn.us/bin/bldbill.php?bill=H0851.0&session=ls84
-2-
/r
MLC OPPOSES GOVERNOR PAWLENTY'S
TURBOCHARGED TRUTH IN TAXATION
On Wednesday, March 10'h Governor Pawlenty and House Taxes Committee Chairman Phil Krinkie (R-
Shoreview) laid out a proposal for "turbocharged truth in taxation" -- a notification mechanism that would
make it easier for property owners to block property tax increases by city and county governments.
The proposed system (which would require legislative approval) would work like this: attached to the
bottom of the annual notices of planned property tax changes -- the truth in taxation notices, mailed in
November — would be a simple new survey designed to determine whether taxpayers are satisfied with the
city's and county's proposed tax levy. The detachable form would ask taxpayers two questions (the
proposal does not include school districts):
1) Are you satisfied with the proposed property tax levy for the county?
2) Are you satisfied with the proposed property tax levy for the city?
If the number of mailed -in "no" responses exceeded 20 percent of the total parcels of property in the
jurisdiction, a referendum would be triggered, and voters would be able to choose between two options: the
proposed levy, almost always an increase, or freezing it at the prior year's level. Property owners would get
a vote on the triggering mechanism for each parcel they own, meaning those with more than one parcel
would get more than one vote. Renters would not vote. 1 See details below for how the plan would unfold:
Nov. 9 -21: Truth in taxation notices with new "taxpayer satisfaction surveys" are sent to taxpayers.
Dec. 1: Surveys must be received to be counted.
Dec. 8: Results of survey are announced. If "no" responses exceed 20 percent of total parcels of
property in the jurisdiction, a referendum would be triggered.
Dec. 15: Deadline to recertify levy at previous level to prevent referendum.
Dec. 28: Tentative final levy certification.
Jan. 31: If triggered, referendum would be held, with voters choosing between proposed levy for
2006 and the actual levy for 2005. Referendum would be open to all qualified voters, not just
property taxpayers.
Note: The survey would not apply to school districts and townships or cities with a population under 500.
Source: Governor's office
The proposal has drawn criticism from local government groups.
"Leaders of umbrella organizations for city and county government said the proposal contains several
procedural problems, one being that the timetable laid out would schedule a referendum one month after
cities have certified their annual budgets. It's government by polling, asking for a simplistic response to
complex issues," said Jim Mulder, executive director of the Association of Minnesota Counties. "Elected
county officials spend months making difficult decisions, and citizens would spend seconds on one small
part of the decision." (Star Tribune, Smith, 3.10.05).
The MLC opposes Governor Pawlenty's proposal, because it imposes limitations on local decision making.
The Turbocharged Truth in Taxation proposal significantly limits the predictability necessary for local
governments to plan with financial confidence.
1 Details provided by the Star Tribune "Pawlenty seeks tax - increase blocker" (Smith, 3/10/05).
-3-
JOHN A. McHUGH
5225 GRANDVIEW SQUARE. #214
EDINA. MINNESOTA 55436
Y -Aoov, ! (4, -LO vs
4�4e� a-,� ,c,Q,ae4
1
g Pie ,
Y- i.A Z V
Ale
� 1; (/' j�' 'i "�/ �; .;'�, j ��,'�` .� � y .yam: •,� +�" ,,� .l - � 1 .; " . ,
1
621
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 273
Regular Meeting, March 21, 2005
Room 349, Edina Community Center
AGENDA
Determination of Quorum and Call to Order
Approval of Minutes of Meeting of February 28, 2005
Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting of March 3, 2005
HEARINGS OF INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS, AND PRESENTATION OF PETITIONS FROM THE
PUBLIC REGARDING ITEMS BEFORE THE BOARD FOR ACTION OR ON ANY OTHER ISSUE
( *SEE ATTACHED DETAIL.)
PRESENTATIONS
"We Care, We Dare, We Share" Learning Experiences at South View Middle School —
Principal Trevor Johnson; .Teachers Michelle Schulze, Claude Sigmund, and Heidi Howard;
and Students Amy Jordan, Joe Leon, Megan Gaard, Lauren Densinger, and Matt Briggs
➢ Alliance for Student Achievement Rally Media Coverage and Legislative Update — Dr.
Kenneth Dragseth, Superintendent, and Laura Tueting Nelson, Director of Communications
and Public Affairs
REPORTS
➢ Community Education Services Fund Budget -Karin Rutter, Community Education
Services Board Chair, and Doug Johnson, Director of Community Education Services
-and Facilities
➢ School Improvement Planning — Maria Giampietro, Director of Administrative Services,
and John Devine, Normandale Elementary School Principal
➢ CBOC — Peyton Robb, Board of Education
ACTION
364
365
366
367
368
369
369a
369b
Personnel Recommendations
Insurance Consultant
Edina Public Schools Equipment Sale
Purchase of Materials for Elementary Language Arts Program
Student Teaching Agreement with Luther College
Edina High School Distributive Education Clubs of America (DECA)
National Leadership Conference
Asbestos Abatement at South View Middle School
Elementary School Deferred Maintenance Bids, appended
CONSENT
370 Community Education Services Personnel Recommendations
371 Gift from Patricia Danforth
372 Gift from Wells Fargo
373 Gift from Edina Girls Athletic Association
374 Gift from Perry and Rosemary Larson
622 -625
626
627
628 -630
631` -632
633 -634
634a
634b
635
636
637
638
639
375
Gift from the Wachovia Foundation
640
376
Gift from Anonymous Donor
641
377
Gift from Target
642
378
Gifts from Edina Education Fund
643
DISCUSSION
Revised Procedure 1330 — Community Relations: Use of School
674
Facilities, appended
379
Revised Policy 1600 — Community Relations: Relations Between
644 -645
675 -676
Nonpublic and Other Educational Organizations and the Schools
Revised Procedure 4222 — Licensed Personnel: Area Leader
380
Revised Policy 1610X20 — Community Relations: Relations with
646 -648
682 -684
Parochial /Private Schools
Services Governance CES Board- Structure
381
Revised Policy 2000.1 —Administration: Equal Opportunity
649 -651
382
Revised Policy 2000.2 — Administration: Commitment to Diversity
652 -653
383
Revised Policy 5139 — Students: Hazing Prohibition
654 -657
384
Revised Policy 6200 — Instruction- Community Education Services
658 -659
Statement of Mission
Student Adventure Leadership Team (SALT) Service-
385
Revised Policy 6210 — Instruction: Community Education Services
660 -661
386
Revised Policy 6216 - Instruction: Community Education Financial
662 -663
691
Support
Debate Team to Lexington, Kentucky
387
Deleted Policy 6216.1 — Instruction: Fees for Community Education
664 -665
388
Revised Policy 7430 — New Construction: Change Orders
666 -667
INFORMATION
389
Expenditures Payable on March 14, 2005, appended
668
_ 390
Bond Fund Expenditures Payable on March 3, 2005
669 -670
391
Bond Fund Expenditures Payable on March 17, 2005
671 -672
392
Enrollment as of February 25, 2005
673
393
Revised Procedure 1330 — Community Relations: Use of School
674
Facilities, appended
394
Revised Procedure 2000.2 — Administration: Commitment to Diversity
675 -676
395
Revised Procedure 4222 — Licensed Personnel: Area Leader
677 -681
396
Revised Procedure 6201.1 — Instruction: Community Education
682 -684
Services Governance CES Board- Structure
-
397
Revised Procedure 6201.2 — Community Education Services
685 -687
Governance Organization Chart
398
Community Education Services Habitat for Humanity Service Trip to
688
Charleston, South Carolina
399
Student Adventure Leadership Team (SALT) Service-
689 -690
Learning /Backpacking Expedition to Superior Hiking Trail
400
Highlands Grade 2 Voyageur Environmental Camp
691
401
Debate Team to Lexington, Kentucky
692
402
Debate Team to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
693
403
Boys' Varsity Golf Team to Brainerd, Minnesota
694
404
Recognition of Staff
695
Adjournment
*Persons who wish to address the Board are requested to complete and submit an appropriate form to the Board
Secretary prior to the designated hearing time. When recognized, each individual shall identify himself /herself
and the group represented, if any. He /She shall then state the reason for addressing the Board and shall be
limited in time at the discretion of the Board Chair. Individual employees of the School District or representatives
of employee organizations shall have utilized administrative procedures before making a request to address the
Board.
The City of Edina
V\J E L C 0 I'VAI E S
you and your
guests!
Family outings, gatherings of neighborhood groups and
business meetings all bring people closer together. The
City of Edina nurtures that spirit by making many of its
facilities available for private rental. Whether you need a
room by the lake to impress your business clients, or an
indoor garden to celebrate your wedding, you can rent the
ideal facility from the City of Edina.
The following is a list of the City's various rental facilities,
complete with descriptions and a list of amenities so
you can choose the ideal location for your meeting or
celebration. Each listing also includes contact informatio
so you can find more information and get in touch with
the people who secure your reservation.
You have the benefit of Edina's parks and facilities for
your own private use. All facilities feature free parking.
Please make yourself at home!
Braemar Arena, 7501 Ikola Way, is an indoor facility that
keeps ice ready for year -round skating and hockey. The
Arena can he rented by groups looking to make skating
part of their private celebrations. Anyone interested in
renting ice can visit the Minnesota Ice Arena Manager
Association's Rink Finder website, www.rinkfinder.com,
to check availability.A deposit of $20 per hour plus
applicable tax is required one day prior to the rental.
For more information, call Braemar Arena, 952- 941 -1322.
Clubhouse
The Warren C. Hyde Clubhouse at Braemar Golf Course
provides a friendly setting for meetings and banquets.
Visitors can rent the Braemar Room year -round and seat
approximately 200 guests. Whether guests relax on the
deck or hire a disc jockey or band and make use of the
dance floor, the Braemar Room can serve most types of
gatherings. From October to March, the Braemar Room
can be expanded to include the Clubhouse and Grill
to accommodate another 50 guests. Renters must hire
off-premise caterers subject to approval by the City of
Edina. Beer and wine are permitted in the Braemar Room,
as long as guests use Braemar's bartending service.
The Harry Cooper Lounge is a more manageable space for
meetings of 15 to 35 people-The lounge is located in the
lower level of the Clubhouse and overlooks the course.
Both the Harry Cooper Lounge and the Braemar Room
S h audio-visual equipment available for business
ntations.
For more information, call the Clubhouse Manager,
952 - 82791.
The colorful foliage and architecture surrounding a 10-
acre lake make Centennial Lakes Park a lovely location
to meet with friends or business associates. Visitors
canquietly use the swinging benches and walking paths
around the park, or enjoy more rousing putting, lawn
bowling and croquet games.
From mid ,'March through the first week in December,
individuals and groups can rent space in the Park
Centrum that are perfect for meetings, banquets or other
parties. The Centrum has fireplaces and floor -to- ceiling
windows overlooking the lake and gardens.The Centrum's
Parlor and Fireside rooms comfortably seat 72 and 40
w
n-
- t ,.
`pectively. These rooms can be rented separately
together. On Friday and Saturday, the rooms will be
opened up to accomodate 120 guests.
Any licensed caterer may serve food in the Centrum,
and the Centennial Lakes staff can provide a list of
recommended caterers. Package prices for alcoholic
beverages are available.
The Maetzold Amphitheater at Centennial Lakes is a
beautiful outdoor location for rent for your wedding.
The amphitheater is open from May through October and
stands in the same lakefront surroundings as the Centrum.
Groups can also schedule
games and tournaments on
the park's putting greens and
croquet and bowling lawns.
Competitors can rent the
nearby Centrum Building
and order catering, or grab
a bite at several close
restaurants. The park staff
can help organize your event.
For more information, visit
www.CentennialLakesPark.com
or call the park's Special Events
Coordinator, 952 - 832 -6789.
Take the beauty of gardens, grottos and waterfalls and
preserve it with the controlled climate of an indoor
facility. The finished product would be the one -acre
indoor Edinborough Park.
In addition to the gardens and waterfalls, Edinborough
Park's Great Hall provides an ideal spot for wedding
receptions, company parties and proms. The Great Hall
can accommodate 50 to 350 people, and is available
Friday and Saturday evenings from mid -April through
October. Edinborough Park welcomes any licensed
caterer to serve food at your
event and staff will provide a
recommended caterer list to
narrow your choices. Beverage
service packages for alcoholic
beverages are also available.
Rental of the park also includes
a 250 -seat amphitheatre
complete with dressing rooms.
The theater is designed with
lighting and sound - perfect for
ceremonies or presentations.
For more information, visit www.EdinboroughtItrk.com or
call the park's Special Events Coordinator, 952 - 832-6783.
Reserve your child's next birthday party at Edinborough's
Playpark!
The birthday party package includes admission to the
Playpark and reserved tables and chairs for three hours.We
have six sites available and each site can accommodate up to
10 people. Up to four sites can be reserved.You must have a
minimum of seven children. The maximum party size is 40.
Rentals are available daily. A minimum of one adult per 10
children is required. The final guest count must be received
at the Park Office 48 hours
prior to the event. Helium
balloons are not allowed.
Parties may bring their
own food and beverages,
but cooking or warming
of any type is prohibited.
Parties without
reservations are not
guaranteed space.
For more information or
to make a reservation,
call 952- 832-6790_
IN . • � .
Edina residents and businesses can rent the Rosland Park
Pavilion for picnics, retmions or other parties. The Pavilion,
an outdoor gazebo with a capacity of 150 people, can be
rented from May through October. Renters of the Pavilion
will have direct access to Rosland Park's softball fields,
tennis and volleyball courts, playground, fishing pier and
view of Lake Cornelia.
For more information, call the Park and Recreation
Department, 952- 826 -0367.
The City of Edina Park and Recreation Department also
rents general park areas.The park areas are great for
picnics and parties, or for competing on the softball fields
and basketball, volleyball and tennis courts. While softball
fields can be reserved, basketball, volleyball and tennis
courts are available on a first -come, first -served basis only.
Itsidents and commercial organizations can also use the
,.arks for photo shoots. No alcohol is allowed in the parks.
For more information, call the Park and Recreation
Department, 952 - 826 -0367.
Edina Aquatic Center
For wet - and -wild private parties, the
Edina Aquatic Center is the place to
splash around. Five - hundred people
can fit in the Aquatic Center and
rush down the water slides, fly
clown the zip line or swim laps in
the pool.The Edina Aquatic Center
can only be rented after normal
business hours, and alcohol is
not permitted.
For information, call
-&V 952 - 826 -0431.
For America's favorite pastime, there is no better place
than Vain Valkenburg or Courtney fields. Courtney Fields has
baseball diamonds complete with lights, and Van Valkenburg
Fields is a complex with three lit softball fields. Whether
competing in a single game or a tournament, Van Valkenburg
and Courtney fields can accommodate everyone's diving
catches and home runs. Van Valkenburg Fields also has an
available concessions stand.
For information on Van Valkenburg Fields, call 952 - 8264932.
For information on Courtney Fields, call 952 - 82(}0431.
The City of Edina tb:anks the following photographers whose work appears
in this brochure: Bloom Photography, Lasting Moments Photography,
Peterson Portraits. Polly Norman Photography and Stater Crosby.
0
• f�CORPOR��O •
1ago
City of Edina
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
Phone: 952 - 927 -8861
www.CityofEditia.com
Scot )U5
Arneson Acres Park has indoor and outdoor gathering
spaces available.The facilities offer renters options for
comfortable business meetings or outdoor barbecues.
The Terrace Room is a 50 to 75 person indoor facility that
can be set up with tables, or without tables to seat more
people.The room can be rented by the hour or by the day,
making it a convenient setting either for short meetings
or all -day seminars and group events.A standard -size
refrigerator and sink are available in the Terrace Room,
but there are no cooking appliances. Renters may bring
food or have it catered, and bringing wine and 3.2 percent
beer is permitted as long as it does not leave the room.
The Arneson Acres Gazebo is rented by the half -day or
full day (anything over six hours). Renters can bring their
own tables, chairs, grills and food to the Gazebo area
for a personalized home -style cookout.The site is also
ideal for small weddings.Tents and canopies can be
used if they do not require stakes, but alcohol is not
-mitted.The Gazebo fits approximately 25 people.
Terrace Room and Gazebo can be rented
together by the hour or
for the day.
For more information,
call the Park and
Recreation Department,
952- 826-0367.
The Edina Senior Center is proud to share its new
building with the public. The Senior Center has several
competitively priced rooms of varying capacities that
can be set up for meetings or classes.The rooms can be
rented by the hour or the day, but there is a two-hour
minimum for all rentals.
The Senior Center also has special presentation
equipment such as an overhead projector, television,
VCR and DVD pl
for an added fee,
can use nucropnor
extra cost.The cap;
classrooms range fi
people, and the Gr
Room seats 100.T1
and Grandview Ro
accessible 8 a.m. tc
Monday through F(
Sherwood Room, c
with tables, is avail
hours until the Edir
Library closes each
Saturday rentals are also available.
For more information, call the Senior Center
Manager, 952- 833 -9570.
Who wouldn't want playgrounds and softbal
their backyard? Now, everyone can have that
at least temporarily. Fully enclosed and heat(
shelters are found in four City parks and ser
common needs of picnickers and business p
seeking refuge from their cubicles. The shelt
rented from March through November.The
rented by the half -day or full day (anything
hours). Alcohol is not permitted in the shelt
The shelters at Todd and Walnut Ridge Parks
capacities of approximately 50 people, and e
Weber and Cornelia School parks fit 60 peol
For more
information,
call the
Park and
Recreation
Department,
952- 826-0367.
Guidelines for Participation in Public Hearings*
THE COUNCIL WISHES TO CREATE A POSITIVE ENVIRONMENT FOR
ALL PUBLIC HEARINGS AND MEETINGS. YOUR COOPERATION WILL
HELP CREATE THE BEST POSSIBLE ENVIRONMENT FOR EFFECTIVE
PUBLIC DISCOURSE ON ISSUES.
• You are encouraged to participate in the public hearing process. To assure
fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing,
speakers should observe the following guidelines:
o� anSilvidual speaker shoul emit their presentation to 5 minutes or less;
o a speaker on behalf of a group should limit their presentation to 10
minutes or less.
Note: The Mayor or the presiding officer will have the discretion to modify
presentation times, as deemed necessary.
• If you are going to speak:
o present petitions, letters or printed material to the City Clerk prior to the
beginning of your presentation;
o when addressing the Council, stand at the podium and begin your
presentation with your name and address;
o direct your presentation to the Council and not a specific member or staff
person;
o try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers;
o your comments should be limited to the matter under consideration;
o you may possibly be allowed to speak a second time but not until
everyone who wishes to speak has done so for the first time.
• As a member of the audience at a public hearing: f , �G�II►�►l�1'/t1ti
o you should avoid the use of signs, clapping, chee Lgor bo oing or any
other form of verbal or nonverbal communication
crg%te An-.H"jiFi nyi��
o you should not make comment during Council or Board deliberations
unless requested by the Mayor or presiding officer for more information.
Thank you for following the above guidelines.
*To be included in the "Welcome to a Meeting of the Edina City Council' brochure.
Commuter Challenge Roundtable
HOW LOCAL EMPLOYERS PROMOTE COMMUTING OPTIONS
Earth Day, April 22nd, 7:45 -9:30 a.m.
WHY: Commuters want options, businesses want congestion relief.
Be part of the solution and learn how easy it is to promote commuter
alternatives.
WHAT: This FREE breakfast event will allow you to learn how other
employers promote the Commuter Challenge and other commuting
programs. The Commuter Challenge is a campaign encouraging employ-
ees to try an alternative such as busing, biking or carpooling and reward-
ing them with the chance to win great prizes, including a 30 -inch flat -
screen LCD TV, commuter bicycles, iPods, Bed & Breakfast packages, and
more.
WHERE: Best Buy Corporate Campus, 7601 Penn Avenue, Richfield. This
location has a bus stop; please visit metrotransit.org to plan your trip.
RSVP: by April 15th to 494 Commuter Services
PHONE: 952 - 848 -4947
EMAIL: Melissa @494corridor.org
Employer Panel and Topics:
Starkey Labs - Carpooling
Best Buy - Vanpooling
Ramsey County - Busing
Star Tribune - Bicycling
Ceridian - Telecommuting
Breakfast Sponsors
LCM 1 I HIWAY YT FEDERAL
_
CREDIT UMON
i
fKU7[R C1141 ENGf
SET YQU fD v, ,t7Dl
r
N
Presented by the
Commuting Solution Partners:
Metro Commuter Services Minneapolis TMO
494 Commuter Services Anoka County TMO
Midway TMO Metro Transit St. Paul TMO