HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-04-19_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 19, 2005
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to
HRA items and by the Council Members. as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in
bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will'be enacted by one motion. There will
be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it. In
such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the
Agenda.
I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of April 5, 2005
II. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS - As per Pre -List dated April 6, 2005, TOTAL
$1,332.18.
III. ADJOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION - EDINA HIGH SCHOOL ALPINE SKI TEAM
I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of April 5, 2005 and Board of Review of April 11, 2005
II. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS - Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by
Engineer. Public comment heard: Motion to close hearing. If Council wishes to proceed, action by
1 resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council required to pass if improvement is
petitioned for; 4/5 favorable rollcall if no petitions.
Rollcall. A. PUBLIC HEARING ROADWAY. RECONSTRUCTION - Schaefer Road - Improvement No. A -216
Rollcall B. PUBLIC HEARING ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION - Schaefer Circle - Improvement No: A -217
RolicaIl C. PUBLIC HEARING ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION - West 58th Street Improvement No. BA-
328
Ill. PUBLIC HEARINGS ON VACATIONS OF STREET OR UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS
Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing.
If Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution 3/5 favorable rollcall of Council Members required
to pass.
A. PUBLIC HEARING - VACATION OF PUBLIC STREET - Pukwana Lane - Continue to 5/3/05
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND. REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Zoning Ordinances: First Reading
requires affirmative rollcall votes of three Council members except that a rezoning from residential to
non - residential requires four affirmative votes. Second Reading requires affirmative rollcall votes of
three of Council to pass except rezoning from residential to non - residential requires four affirmative
votes. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall votes of four members of Council to pass. Final
Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: Affirmative rollcall vote of three
Council members required passing. Conditional Use Permit: Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council
members required to pass. Variance Appeal: Favorable rollcall of Council Members present to uphold
or deny appeal
Rollcall A. PUBLIC HEARING - AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT FINAL APPROVAL - Haugland Companies. 3901 -3907 West 50th Street and 5000-
5020 France Avenue South. Retail and Residential Redevelopment.
Agenda /Edina City Council
April 19, 2005
Page 2
' B. PUBLIC HEARING - FINAL REZONING AND FINAL PLAT APPROVAL - Mark
Jones/Pukwana Townhomes LLC. 5125 49th Street West. Townhouse Development - Continue
to 5/3/05
Rollcall C. PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - City of Edina and Independent School
District 273. Edina Community Center and Southview Campus. Generally located east of Hwy
100, west of Concord Avenue and south of Southview Lane. Construction of Gyms.
Rollcall D. PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - Good Samaritan Church. 5730 Grove Street.
Church Expansion
' E. PUBLIC HEARING - PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL - The Blake School and City of
Hopkins. West of Blake Road/North of Belmore Lane - Continued to 5/3/05
V. AWARD OF BID
* A. Robotic Total Station Unit (Engineering)
* B. Deck Replacement and Expansion - Edina Aquatic Center
* C. Theme Wall Addition - Edina Aquatic Center
VI. REPORTS/ RECOMMENDATIONS
A. PUBLIC HEARING - Temporary On -Sale Liquor License 501h & France Business Association Edina
Art Fair
* B. Vernon Avenue Watermain Agreement with St. Louis Park
C. Park Board Appointment
VII. FINANCE
* A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per Pre -List dated April 6, 2005, TOTAL
$444,568.06; and April 13, 2005, TOTAL $631,236.46.
VIII. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS
* A. RECEIVE PETITION - Requesting Street Lighting at 5900 Vernon Avenue
IX. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
X. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
XI. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
XII. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEM
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
Mon
Apr 25
Continuation Date Board of Appeals
5:00 P.M.
Tues
May 3
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
Tues
May 10
Joint Meeting Council /Plan Comm /Trans Comm
5:00 -8:00 P.M.
Tues
May 17
PUBLIC WORKS OPEN HOUSE
3:00 -7:30 P.M.
Tues
May 17
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
Mon
May 30
MEMORIAL DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Offices Closed
Tues
Jun 7
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
Tues
June 21
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
Mon
July 4
INDEPENDENCE DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Offices Closed
Tues
July 5
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
Tues
July 19
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CENTENNIAL LAKE CENTRUD
PUBLIC WORKS BUILDINI
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MINUTES
OF THE
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
HELD AT CITY HALL
APRIL 5, 2005
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Housh, Masica, Swenson and Mayor
Hovland.
CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Housh and seconded
by Commissioner Swenson approving the Consent Agenda for the Edina Housing and
Redevelopment Authority as presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR MARCH 15, 2005, APPROVED Motion made
by Commissioner Housh and seconded by Commissioner Swenson approving the Minutes
of the regular meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for March 15,
2005.
Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes.
There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda,
Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned.
Executive Director
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO #
13946 41712005 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO.
1,332.18 CONSULTING FEES
1,332.18
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
4/7/2005 —417/2005
Doc No Inv No Account No
109127 2327C11Y04 -1 9137.1719
Subledger Account Description
PROF FEES ARCH AND ENG
1,332.18 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals
Check Total 1,332.18
Total Payments 1,332.18
41612005 8:33:28
Page - 1
Business Unit
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE SUBDISTRIC
R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 4/6/2005 8:33:37
Council Check Summary Page - 1
4/7/2005 417/2006
Company Amount
09000 HRA FUND 1.332.18
Report Totals 1.332.18
We confirm to the best of Our knowledge
and belief, that these claims
comply in all material respects
with the requirements of the City
of Edina purchasing
E licies and
procedures d
Finance D or
City Manager
O e
veon
1888
RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION
EDINA HIGH SCHOOL
2005 GIRLS' ALPINE SKI TEAM
WHEREAS, the members of the Edina High School 2005 Girls' Alpine Ski Team
were Champions of the Classic Lake Conference, Section 6AA Champions and State
Champions; and
WHEREAS, success has come to the members of the Team because of their
extraordinary ability, hours of practice and the leadership of their coaches; and
WHEREAS, as representatives of the City of Edina, the members of the Team
exemplified the highest standards of athletic proficiency and good sportsmanship; and
WHEREAS, this is Edina's 119th State Championship.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that congratulations
be extended to the members of the Team:
Mallory Baker Leslie Fox Dave Nelson, Coach
Jaci Daudt Patricia Lindholm Sue Nelson, Coach
Perrie Finsand Ellie White Sarah Nelson, JV Coach
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be recorded in the Minutes of the Edina
City Council and that copies be given to members of the Team.
ADOPTED this 19th day of April, 2005.
James B. Hovland, Mayor
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT CITY HALL
APRIL 5, 2005
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Housh, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by
Member Swenson approving the Council Consent Agenda as presented with the exception of
Agenda Item III. D., P90 Carbines, Ammunition and Accessories, Agenda Item E.
Commodities Purchase, Sand, Rock, Bituminous Materials, Concrete & Engine Oil, and Water
Treatment Chemicals, and Agenda Item F. Valley View Road Lighting - Contract 05 -1,
Improvement No. L42.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
RECOGNITION OF TDM EFFORTS BY UNITED PROPERTIES AT CENTENNIAL LAKES
OFFICE PARK NOTED Melissa Madison, of 494 Commuter Services thanked the City for the
great partnership in promoting alternatives to the drive alone commute as well as membership in
the 494 Corridor Commission.
Mayor Hovland presented an award to United Properties at Centennial Lakes Office Park for its
exceptional commitment to reducing traffic congestion by promoting commuting alternatives. In
2004 they won the prestigious "Commuter Choice Award" from the Metropolitan Council for
outstanding promotion of reducing drive alone commutes.
Dave VanHattam, of 494 Commuter Services, explained the Earth Day, April 22, Commuter
Challenge Roundtable which will be held from 7:45 - 9:30 A.M. at the Best Buy Corporate
Campus, 7601 Penn Avenue in Richfield. He presented a video suggesting Travel Demand
Management via "Van Go ".
*MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 1, 2005, AND MARCH 15, 2005, AND
SPECIAL MEETINGS OF MARCH 8, MARCH 14, AND MARCH 15, 2005, APPROVED
Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Swenson, approving the Minutes
of the Regular Meeting of the Edina City Council for March 1, 2005, and March 15, 2005, and
Special Meetings of March 8, March 14, and March 15, 2005.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
*HEARING DATE OF APRIL 19, 2005, FOR PLANNING MATTERS Motion made by Member
Housh and seconded by Member Swenson setting April 18, 2005, for hearing date for planning
matters as follows:
1. Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance and Conditional Use Permit Final Approval.
Haugland Companies. 3901- 3907 West 50th Street and 5000 - 5020 France Avenue South
- Retail and Residential Redevelopment.
2. Preliminary Plat Approval. The Blake School and City of Hopkins. West of Blake
Road/North of Belmore Lane.
Page 1
Minutes/Edina City. Council/Apri15, 2005
3. Final Rezoning and Final Plat Approval. Mark Jones/Pukwana Townhomes LLC - 5125
49th Street West -. Townhouse Development.
4. Conditional Use Permit - City of Edina and Independent School District 283. Edina
Community Center and Southview Campus. Generally located east of Highway 100,
west of Concord Avenue and south of Southview Lane Construction of Gyms..
5. Conditional Use Permit - Good Samaritan Church - 5730 Grove Street - Church
Expansion.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
*RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -27 LOT DIVISION FOR PARTY WALL AT 6016 - 6020 BERNE
CIRCLE APPROVED Member Housh introduced the following resolution, seconded by
Member Swenson and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-27
APPROVING A LOT DIVISION FOR
6016 - 6020 BERNE CIRCLE
WHEREAS, the following described properties are at present one tract of land:
Lot 3, Block 1, DECKAS ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the owner has requested the subdivision of said tract into separate parcels
(herein called "parcels "), described as follows:
PARCEL 1:
Lot 3, Block 1, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying northerly of the following described
line•
Commencing at that part of Lot 3 lying Southwesterly of a line described as running
from a point in the West line of said Lot'3 distant 107.0 feet North of the Southwest
corner thereof, to a point in the Southeasterly line 31.5 feet Northeasterly from the most
Southeasterly corner of said Lot 3, as measured along said Southeasterly line all in
Block 1, DECKAS ADDITION.
PARCEL 2:
Lot 3, Block 1, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying southerly of the following described
line:
Commencing at that part of Lot 3 lying Southwesterly of a line described as running
from a point in the West line of said Lot 3 distant 107.0 feet North of the Southwest
corner thereof, to a point in the Southeasterly line 31.5 feet Northeasterly from the most
southeasterly corner of said Lot 3 as measured along said Southeasterly line all in Block
1, DECKAS ADDITION.
WHEREAS, the requested subdivision is authorized under Code Section 810 and it has
been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of
Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said newly created Parcels as separate tracts of
land do not interfere with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the Edina
City Code Sections 810 and 850;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that
the conveyance and ownership of the above described, tracts of land (PARCEL 1 and PARCEL
2) as separate tracts of land are hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Code
Sections 850 and 810 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as
Page 2
Minutes/Edina City. Council/April 5, 2005.
separate tracts of land but only to the extent permitted under Code Sections 810 and,' 850
subject to the limitations set out in Code Section 850 and said Ordinances are now waived for
any other purpose or as to any other provisions thereof, and further'subject, however, to the
provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with
the pertinent Ordinances of the City of Edina.
Adopted this 5th day of April, 2005.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
UPDATE GIVEN ON WALLINGFORD PROPERTIES Planner Larsen reminded the Council
that a rezoning of the Wallingford Properties at 5101 West 70th Street had been approved on July
20, 2004. This would have allowed development of the site with a 106 -unit development. The
plans approved illustrated a 74 -unit rental building and a 32 -unit condominium building. There
were two owners of the property Tony and Vasco Bernardi. Mr. Larsen said that Tony planned
to build the condos while Vasco's plan was to build the 74 -unit apartment side of the project.
Since approval was granted Tony Bernardi has sold his portion of the property and Vasco has,
based upon a market study decided that his 74 -unit luxury apartments would not be feasible. Mr.
Larsen introduced Vasco Bernardi to make his request of the Council in person.
Vasco Bernardi, owner of 5105 West 70th Street requested the Council allow him to redesign the
interior of his portion of the building making each unit smaller and increasing the number of
units to 84 with at least 20 percent of the units becoming affordable housing. In order to
accomplish this Mr. Bernardi explained he would need the City of Edina to assist him with Tax
Increment Financing. Mr. Bernardi introduced Wally Johnson of Stonebridge Companies in
Apple Valley and Todd Young of KKE Architects who reviewed in detail for the Council the
proposal Mr. Bernardi was making. In addition, Dennis Nichols, the purchaser of Tony
Bernardi's property, explained his intention for his portion of the property. After discussing with
the proponent's alternative proposal the Council declined to take any further action on this
property.
*BID AWARDED FOR KOTETIN PARK PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT Motion made by
Member Housh and seconded by Member Swenson for award of bid for Playground
Equipment for Kojetin Park to recommended low bidder, Koolmo Construction, Inc., at
$107,815.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR TACOBSEN HR -9016 ROTARY MOWER FOR PARK MAINTENANCE
DEPARTMENT Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Swenson for
award of bid for a Jacobsen HR -9016 Rotary Mower for the Park Maintenance Department to
recommended bidder, Carlson Tractor Company under State Contract #434108 at $52,609.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR 3/4 TON PICK -UP TRUCK - FOR PARK MAINTENANCE
DEPARTMENT Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Swenson for
award of bid for one 3/4 ton pick -up truck for the Park Maintenance Department to
recommended_ bidder, Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet under State Bid Contract #433478, at
$18,404.90.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
Page 3
E
Minutes/Edina City Council/April 5, 2005
AWARD OF BID FOR ELEVEN P -90 CARBINES, AMMUNITION AND ACCESSORIES FOR
POLICE DEPARTMENT Member Masica asked that the award of bid for eleven P -90 Carbines,
Ammunition and Accessories be removed from the Consent Agenda for further information. She
questioned whether the purchase price of the Carbines was covered totally by the private donor.
Chief Siitari said yes.
Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Swenson for award of bid for
eleven P -90 Carbines, Accessories and Ammunition to recommended sole bidder, Streichers
Police Equipment at $42,550.00.
Ayes: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
BID AWARDED FOR COMMODITIES . - SAND, ROCK, BITUMINOUS MATERIALS,
CONCRETE AND ENGINE OIL, AND WATER TREATMENT CHEMICALS Member Masica.
asked that the bid award for commodities for sand, rock, bituminous materials, concrete and
engine oil and water treatment chemicals be removed from the consent agenda for further
information. She questioned why there was an alternate award of bid for asphalt for 2005. Mr.
Houle explained asphalt was a hot mix and if the designated bidder was not available when the
mix was needed, the alternate bidder was called upon to supply the hot mix asphalt.
Member Masica made a motion approving the award of bid for sand, rock, bituminous
materials, concrete, engine oil and water treatment chemicals for period April 1, 2005 to March
31, 2006, to recommended bidders as follows: Coarse Sand (delivered) to SA -AG at $6.45 per
ton, CL2.Limestone (delivered) to Midwest Asphalt (recycled material) at $10.50 per ton;
CL2.Limestone (delivered) (alternate bid) to Bryan Rock (new material) at $11.60 per ton; FA -2
Seal Coat Chips (delivered) to Dresser Trap Rock at $28.80 per ton; *Asphalt 2331 Base Type 31
or 32 (delivered) to Midwest Asphalt at $32.60 per ton or (picked up at plant) to Midwest
Asphalt at $27.60 per ton; *Asphalt 2331 Base Type 31 or 32 (alternate bid) to Bituminous
Roadways (delivered) at $35.00 per ton or to Bituminous Roadways (picked .up at plant) at
$27.50 per ton; *Asphalt 2331 Base Type 41 or 42 (delivered) to Midwest Asphalt at $33.75 per
ton or to Midwest Asphalt (picked up at plant) at $28.75 per ton; *Asphalt 2331 Base Type 41 or
42 (alternate bid) to Bituminous Roadways (delivered) at $37.00 per ton or Bituminous
Roadways (picked up at plant) at $29.50 per ton; *Asphalt 2331 Wear Type 41 or 42 to Midwest
Asphalt (delivered) at $32.75 per ton or Midwest Asphalt (picked up at plant) at $27.75 per ton;
*Asphalt 2331 Wear type 41 or 42 (delivered) to Bituminous Roadways at $35.50; *Asphalt 2331
Wear Type 41 or 42 (picked up at plant) to Bituminous Roadways at $28.00, *Asphalt 2331 Wear
Type 31 or 32 (delivered) to Midwest Asphalt at $33.50 per ton or to Midwest Asphalt (picked
up at Plant) $28.50 per ton; *Asphalt 2331 Wear Type 31 or 32 (alternate bid) to Bituminous
Roadways (delivered) at $37.00 per ton and to Bituminous Roadways (picked up at plant) at
$29.50 per ton; Asphalt 2360 to Midwest Asphalt (delivered) at $33.75 per ton or to Midwest
Asphalt (picked up at plant) at $28.75 per ton; Asphalt 2360 (alternate bid) to Commercial
Asphalt (picked up at plant) at $33.40 per ton; Concrete 3+ yards (delivered) to Agg. IndAagan
at $80.65 CY, Emulsified Asphalt CRS2 to Marathon Ashland at 0.7390 per gallon; Emulsified
Tack Oil to Bituminous Roadways at $26.00 per gallon; Crack Joint Sealer to Bargen at $0.332
per pound; Hydrofluosilicic Acid to DPC Industries at $9.03 per 55 gallon drum,
Hydrofluosilicic Acid to DPC Industries at $9.03 per 140 gallon drum, Liquid Chlorine to DPC
Industries at $36.20 CWT; Water Treatment Chemical (Poly) to DPC Industries at $4.35 per
gallon; Caustic Soda to DPC Industries at $28.06 per CWT; Manhole Covers (complete casting)
to Ess Brothers & Sons, Inc. at $764.00 each; Red Ball Aggregate to Bryan Rock at $15.72 per
ton; Lannon Stone Wall Repair to Bjork Stone at $16.25 per SF.
Page 4
Minutes/Edina Ci!y Council/April 5, 2005.
( *These items are awarded on basis of total cost per ton including trucking and labor, and past
year's performance.) Member Housh seconded the motion
Ayes: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
AWARD OF BID FOR VALLEY VIEW ROAD LIGHTING - CONTRACT 05 -1,
IMPROVEMENT NO. L-42 Member Masica asked that the award of bid for Valley View Road
Lighting be removed from the Consent Agenda for further information. She asked about the
funding of the Valley View. Road lighting Contract 05 -01 (Improvement No. L042). Mr. Houle
responded that funding was between Municipal Sate Aid System funds and special assessments.
Member Masica made a motion approving the award of bid for the Valley View Road
Lighting, Contract 05 -1, Improvement No. L-42 to recommended low bidder LPD Electric, Inc.,
at $97,160.00.
Ayes: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TRAFFIC POLICY ADOPTED Assistant City Engineer
Lillehaug reminded the Council that a public hearing was held on March 1, 2005, to take public
comment on the final draft of the Transportation Commission Policy. Following the public
hearing two work sessions were held with the City Council and the Transportation Commission
and a revised version of the final draft has been completed.
Council Comments:
Member Masica asked for clarification of the role of the Traffic Safety Committee as opposed to
the Transportation Commission within the process. She further inquired if residents can still
make requests through the Traffic Safety Committee. Traffic Engineer Lillehaug said two
processes exist; 1) Traffic Safety honors requests for signs, etc. and of which staff follows strict
guideline warrant analysis, and 2) Traffic calming requests would be considered by the
Transportation Commission. Residents should be made aware that to avoid any confusion,
requests should begin with staff or the engineering department.
Member Masica questioned whether 'parking' and 'pedestrian/ bicycle' policies now located in
two sections could be integrated. Mr. Hughes responded that the guidance from the workshop
was the Transportation plan quoted verbatim. Member Housh pointed out the statement (page
4), 'In addition to the policies contained in the Transportation Plan, the Edina Transportation
Commission has adopted the following policies:' He added that the Comprehensive Plan was
being maintained with the additional comments augmenting the plan. Member Swenson said in
order. to keep the plans separate, the Council made the decision to do it in this manner. Mayor
Hovland said a method of integration to simplify the ability to use the policy should be sought.
Council consensus was to Bold the introductory statement of the policy section.
Ms. Masica questioned whether #6 on page 3 (Providing access .......... rather than the existing
access at the sites) meant to change classifications to suit re- development. Mr. Lillehaug said it
addresses safety issues with access to a site which follows MnDOT "s guidelines regarding access
control. Ms. Masica questioned #8 on Page 5 and asked if a strategy had been developed for
structuring. Mr. Lillehaug responded presently the Planning Commission reviews any land use
changes and it has not been decided how to include the Transportation Commission in initiating
the review process for land use changes. Mayor Hovland suggested a change on page 5 #8 to
Page 5.
Minutes/Edina City Council/April 5, 2005.
read, "When requested by the Planning Commission, review land use that 'nay impact traffic
implementations. Continue to monitor adjacent community redevelopment and other activity
that potentially impacts the City of Edina ".
Member Masica questioned why the Action Plan on page #6 was still in the document. Mr.
Lillehaug said it was important for the Action Plan to remain in the document presently. Member
Masica made a correction in paragraph 6, that should read, "Steps (c) through (e) ".
Mayor Hovland noted typographical errors in the document that required changes.
Joni Kelly - Bennett, voiced concern and noted a clarification on page A -2, adding in the Impacted
Area portion, the words ......... and businesses" along local, etc.
Member Housh complimented the finished produce and said the long, arduous process has
produced a viable, working document.
Member Masica said the policy was a good, solid starting point. She thanked the Commission for
their tireless effort
Mayor Hovland said he believes a collective effort brings forth a better product.and he voiced his
,pleasure with the product.
Member Housh made a motion adopting the City of Edina Transportation Commission Policy
dated April 2005, as amended. Member Masica seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
*RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -23 ADOPTED APPOINTING CHERYL L. ENGELMAN AND
GORDON HUGHES AS AGENTS OF THE COMMUNITY HEALTH BOARD Member Housh
introduced the following resolution seconded by Member Swenson and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-23
APPROVING APPOINTMENT OF CHERYL L. ENGELMAN
AND GORDON HUGHES AS AGENTS OF THE
COMMUNITY HEALTH BOARD
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (Community Health Board) of the City of Edina,
Minnesota, pursuant to its authority under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 145A, that it hereby
appoints and authorizes the following persons to act on the Boards behalf and bind the Board
for the following purposes:
To serve as the Board's agent in communicating with the Commissioner of Health
between Board meetings, including receiving 'information from the Commissioner and
disseminating that information to the Board, as well as providing information to the
Commissioner on the Board's behalf (Minn. Stat.145A.04, Subd. 2).
NAME: Cheryl L. Engelman
ADDRESS: 4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
PHONE: 952- 826 -0464
FAX: 952 - 826 -0390
Page 6
Minutes/Edina City. Council/April 5, 2005
To sign and submit, to the Commissioner the prepared Community Health Plan and
revisions to the plan, and activity reports submitted according to Minn. Stat.145A -10, Subd'. 5,
6, and 8:
NAME: Cheryl L. Engelman
To sign and submit to the Commissioner the Board's annual budget, revisions to the
budget and expenditure reports submitted according to Minn. Stat 145..A.10, Subd. 6 and 8.
NAME: Cheryl L. Engelman
To sign and submit on behalf of the Board, delegation agreements with the
Commissioner of Health according to Minn. Stat.145A.07, Subd.1.
NAME: Gordon L. Hughes
ADDRESS: 4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
PHONE: 952 - 826 -0401
FAX: 952- 826 -0390
Adopted this 5th day of April 2005.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
BOARDS /COMMISSIONS /COMMITTEES TERM LIMITS ADOPTED Manager Hughes
indicated that a report on the appointment dates for existing members of the City's Boards,
Commissions and Committees as requested by the Council had been provided in the packet.
Member Swenson said she computed the average term limits for each Board, Commission and
Committee with a resulting average of 9.3 years of service. She inquired about the lengthy terms
for members of the Construction Board of Appeals. Mr. Hughes responded that they meet very,
infrequently and members have a background in the construction. trades. Member Swenson
noted that terms on the Park Board were questioned but the computed average was at 4.0 years
of service. She suggested if Boards have a turnover of members the Chair of the Board should
also be changed.
Member Masica made suggestions as follows:
1. Term limits set for six years with a one year. moratorium before having the ability to re-
apply;
2. Members limited to one board /commission /committee membership;
3. Term limits may be extended if no qualified applicant applies;
4. Terms must be staggered; and
5. Term for Chair set at one term or three years.
Member Masica suggested if it was a requirement of a board that a member of another board
serve on the board, that term limit would not be taken into consideration.
Member Housh suggested that term limits be set for nine years rather than six, allowing more of
a chance to serve as Chair after learning about the board /commission /committee.
Member Swenson concurred with term limits being set at nine years. She added that rules should
not be changed for individual members.
Member Housh said in order to implement the policy, members who have served nine years
could be asked to not seek re- appointment or the process could be started now.
Page 7
L
Minutes/Edina City Council/April 5, 2005.
Member Swenson suggested the Chair of a respective board /commission /committee be
appointed for one term.
Mr. Hughes noted that currently members are serving staggered terms. If a member's term were
at nine years or over they would serve until the end of their current term.
Mary Jo Strom, 4520 Andover Road, suggested that the terms be limited to six years with the
expectation that they would be up to speed on the board /commission /committee within six
months.
Member Housh noted personally that he, while serving on the Park Board and currently on the
Council, has found that six months was not adequate to "get up to speed ". He added that serving
a full calendar year was what was most beneficial with a learning curve.
Former Mayor Van Valkenburg indicated that acquiring replacements on the Art Center . Board
was not simple. He suggested examining the function of the boards/ commissions/ committees
and considers the advice of 'seasoned' members over the newly appointed ones. Mr. Van
Valkenburg said he does not favor term limits. .
Chris Rofidal, 5037 West 56th Street, said he would support term limits of either six or nine years.
He stated he has applied to serve on a board /commission /committee and believes new members
keep up the viability of the boards.
Martha Rice, 4501 Lakeview ' Drive, said that experience was valued but new vitality was
extremely important on the boards.
Following a Council discussion, Member Masica made a motion approving term limits on City
Boards /Commissions/Committees as follows;
1. Term limits would be nine years with one intervening year before a person was eligible
for reappointment;
2. An individual who now exceeds the term limit may finish their current term but are not
eligible for reappointment;
3. One membership per person except for mandated cross representation;
4. Council may waive the term if no new qualified individual has applied; and
5. Recommendation to each Board/Commission/Committee that no one individual serve
more than three consecutive years as chair.
Member Housh seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
GUIDELINES FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS ADOPTED Mr. Hughes reminded the Council that he
had been directed to prepare background information about establishing more formal procedures
for public hearings. A thorough review of this topic was recently undertaken by the City of Eden
Prairie. Minnesota cities as well as jurisdictions outside of the state were included in the survey.
Although the Edina City Council has not adopted formal written policies concerning hearings,
informal guidelines are included in the Welcome to a Meeting of the Edina City Council"
brochure, which was provided to meeting attendees. The brochure includes the following
guidelines:
Page 8
Minutes/Edina City Council/April 5, 2005
• You may speak at hearings provided your comments are relevant to the discussion.
• When addressing the Council, stand at the podium and begin your presentation by stating
your name and address.
• Present petitions, letters or printed material to the . Clerk prior to beginning your
presentation.
• Please refrain from applause or other unnecessary disturbances.
• After all have spoken, the Council will close the hearing.
Three things that were commonly used by other jurisdictions include:
1. A time limit for speakers, which may be extended if an individual was speaking on
behalf of a group whose individual members will not be testifying
2. No individual. may speak a second time until everyone has had an opportunity to
speak for the first time, and
3. "Encouragement" that individuals refrain from, unduly repeating previous
testimony by. others, Based on Eden Prairie's research, the most common rule
imposed by other jurisdictions was a time limit for speakers. Some jurisdictions,
such as the Edina Public Schools, ask that individuals sign up in .advance if they
wish to address the Council or Board.
Mr. Hughes said it would be appropriate for the Council to discuss protocols with respect to the
"Concerns of Residents" portion of the agenda. Some individuals have used this portion of the
agenda to conduct a de facto public hearing on a particular issue. Some cities have successfully
adopted a more -informal approach to receiving resident concerns. Under such a system,
"Concerns of Residents' would be removed from the agenda and would be considered by the
Council prior to the start of the regular, televised meeting, maybe at 6:30 P.M. Residents wishing
to bring a concern to the Council would sign up in advance if possible. Residents would be given
a limited period of time to present their issue. "Concerns of Residents" would end promptly at
7:00 P.M. with. the start of the regular Council meeting.
Mayor Hovland suggested "Guidelines" for participation in public hearings as follows:
• It was suggested a speaker should limit their presentation to five (5) minutes or less; and
• It was suggested a speaker on behalf of a group should limit their presentation to ten (10)
minutes or less.
The Mayor or presiding officer may have the discretion to modify presentation times.
if a resident wishes to speak they should:
• Present petitions, letters or printed material to the Clerk prior to the beginning of their
presentation;
• Stand at the podium and being the presentation stating their name/ address;
• Direct presentation to whole Council;
• Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers;
• Limit comments to the topic under consideration; and
• Allow all speakers a chance to be heard before speaking a second time.
Residents in the audience at a public hearing should:
• Avoid signs, clapping, cheering, booing or any other form of verbal or non - verbal
communication are not allowed in order to maintain a comfortable environment; and
• Avoid comment during Council or Board deliberations unless requested by the Mayor or
presiding officer asking for more information.
Page 9
Minutes/Edina City. Council/April 5, 2005
Following a Council discussion, Member Housh made a motion approving the Public Hearing
Guidelines as presented and modified. Member Masica seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS Mayor Hovland inquired whether the Council would consider an
one /half hour session at 6:30 PM prior to the regularly scheduled Council meetings for residents
to voice concerns. Following a brief discussion, Council consensus was to maintain the meeting
agenda as usual with "Concerns of Residents" in its designated location and allowing residents a
televised forum before the Council.
No formal Council action was taken.
*DATE SET OF TULY 12, 2005, FOR 40TH ANNUAL BRAEMAR INSPECTION TOUR Motion
made by Member Housh and seconded. by Member Swenson approving July 12, 2005, as the
date for the 401i Annual Braemar Inspection Tour. .
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
IKASU SUSHI BAR AND LOUNGE - ON SALE AND SUNDAY SALE INTOXICATING
LIQUOR LICENSES APPROVED. Mr. Hughes explained. Yang Companies LLC, 'dba /Ekasu
Sushi Bar and Lounge applied for their liquor license on March 25, 2005. All necessary
applications were filed and applicable fees paid. Staff and Chief Siitari have completed their
review. Staff notified the management that their license expired on March 31, and currently they
are not serving liquor until the Council approves their renewal application. Staff recommends
approval of the licenses and will submit necessary documentation. to the State on behalf of Ikasu.
Member Masica asked for background on the February 2005 incident where underage
consumption was noted. Mr. Siitari indicated a walk -thru was done by the Police Department
with the discovery of three underage drinkers. They .were charged, as well as the owner who
attempted to obstruct the legal process. He noted that one - incident does not indicate non - renewal
of the license.
Mr. Yang, co -owner of Ikasu, elaborated that his brother thought the walk -thru by the Police was
more extensive than he believed necessary and therefore he became involved.
Member Swenson made a motion approving the On -Sale Intoxicating and Sunday Sale Liquor
License renewals for Ikasu Sushi Bar and Lounge. Member Housh seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
IKASU SUSHI BAR AND LOUNGE - DANCE PERMIT APPROVED Chief Siitari indicated
that Ikasu Sushi Bar and Lounge has held a dance permit since September 2003. They have
applied for a renewal of the permit. The City has received no problems related to the dance. The
application requests a permit for Monday through Sunday, 9:00 PM to 1:00 AM that was different
from their original request of 10:00 PM to 1:00 AM. Ikasu has held only a few dances within the
last year. Mr. Siitari recommended approval of the permit conditioned upon security personnel,
approved by the Chief of Police, must be on duty when Ikasu operates as a dance club. This
condition was authorized by City Code Section 200.06, Police Protection.
Page 10
Minutes/Edina City. Council/April 5, 2005
Member Housh made a motion to renew the Ikasu Sushi Bar and Lounge Public Dance Permit
for one year conditioned upon security personnel approved by the Chief of Police, being on
duty when Ikasu operates a dance club. Member Swenson seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
*REPLACEMENT WETLANDS DECLARATION APPROVED FOR BRAEMAR GOLF
COURSE 17TH TEE Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Swenson
approving the Replacement Wetlands Declaration Agreement, Consent to Replacement
Wetland, and Affidavit of Landowner as required by the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act
of 1991 and directed by the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, % Barr Engineering
Company.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
*RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -25 - RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORTS: ROADWAY
IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS: NO. A -216 - SCHAEFER ROAD; NO.A -217 - SCHAEFER
CIRCLE; NO. BA -328 - WEST 58TH STREET APPROVED Member Housh introduced the
following resolution, seconded by Member Swenson and moved approval:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-25
ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY REPORTS FOR
SCHAEFER ROAD IMPROVEMENT NO. A -216,
SCHAEFER CIRCLE IMPROVEMENT NO. A -217 AND
WEST 58TH STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -328
WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve the .Schaefer Road, Schaefer Circle, West 58th Street
neighborhood streets and to assess the benefited properties for all or a portion of the cost of
said Improvements No. A -216, A -217, and BA -328 pursuant to Minnesota Statute's, Chapter 429;
and
WHEREAS, the Edina City Engineer has prepared a feasibility report for Schaefer Road - A-
216, Schaefer Circle - A -217, and West 58s' Street - BA -328;
WHEREAS, the reports provide information regarding whether proposed projects are cost
effective and feasible.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby receives the
feasibility reports for Improvements No. A -216, A -217, and BA -328.
Passed and adopted this 5th day of April 2005.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
*RESOLUTION NO 2005 -26 - SETTING HEARING DATE OF MAY 3,_2005, FOR ROADWAY
IMPROVEMENT PROTECTS: NO BA -312 - BRIDGE LANE AND TOWNES ROAD; AND
NO. BA -329 - SHANNON DRIVE Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member
Swenson introducing Resolution No. 2005 -26 and moving its approval:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-26
SET PUBLIC HEARING DATE OF MAY 3, 2005, FOR
ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -312
BRIDGE LANE AND TOWNES ROAD AND
ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -329
SHANNON DRIVE
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE- CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA,
MINNESOTA, that a public hearing shall be held on the 3rd day of May, 2005, in the Council
Chambers at City Hall at 7:00 P.M. to consider Improvement No. BA -312 for roadway
Page 11
Minutes/Edina City Council/April 5, 2005
improvements consisting of Bridge Lane west of Townes Road and Townes Road between
West 481h Street and Bridge Lane and Improvement No. BA -329 consisting of Shannon Drive
between Dewey Hill Road and Kemrich Drive.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall give mailed and published
notice of such hearing and improvements as required by law.
Adopted this 5th day of April 2005.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
*CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Member Housh made a motion and Member Swenson
seconded the motion approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the
Check Register dated March 16, 2005, and consisting of 25 pages: General Fund $210,150.93;
Communications Fund $6,394.75; Working Capital. Fund $15,324.39, Construction Fund
$23,102.23, Art Center Fund $29.95; Golf Dome Fund $2,596.20, Aquatic Center Fund $199.41;
Golf Course Fund $15,843.22, Ice Arena Fund $3,945.51; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund
$7,158.85; Liquor Fund $152,158.18; Utility Fund $100,474.38; Storm Sewer Fund $8,280.68;
Recycling Fund $405.00; PSTF Fund $31,566.10; TOTAL $577,629.78; and for approval of
payment of claims dated March 23; 2005, and consisting of 33 pages: General Fund
$1,025,049.07; Communications Fund $7,404.54; Working Capital Fund $121,936.95; Art Center
Fund $24,916.74; Golf Dome Fund $1,193.52; Aquatic Center Fund $199.41; Golf Course Fund
$31,424.25; Ice Arena Fund $361.89; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $8,599.29, Liquor
Fund $114,796.71; Utility Fund $316,966.84; PSTF Agency Fund $93.04; TOTAL $1,652,942.25
and for approval of payment of claims dated March 30, 2005, and consisting of 27 pages:
General Fund $525,649.19; Communications Fund $12,538.98; Working Capital Fund $3,842.56;
Art Center Fund $5,973.47; Golf Dome Fund $10,227.79; Aquatic Center Fund $223.77; Golf
Course Fund $24,093.23; Ice Arena Fund $3,660.04; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund
$14,731.22; Liquor Fund $128,062.03; Utility Fund $22,164.42; Storm Sewer Fund $1,978.17;
Recycling Fund $20.23, PSTF Agency Fund $4,196.68; TOTAL $757,361.78.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -24 APPROVING ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS BY CITY OF
MINNEAPOLIS ON BEHALF OF FAIRVIEW HEALTH SERVICES Attorney Gilligan indicated
a proposal from Fairview Health Services ("Fairview") has been received requesting the City to
consent to the issuance by the City of Minneapolis of tax- exempt revenue-bonds under Minnesota
Statutes, Section 469.152 to 469.165 to finance a remodeling project at Fairview Southdale
Hospital and to refund bonds previously issued by the Minnesota Agricultural and Economic
Development Board in 1997 and 2000, a portion of proceeds of which financed improvements at
Fairview Southdale. Following a public hearing, he recommended the council approve the
issuance of the bonds by the City of Minneapolis and issue a resolution approving the issuance of
the bonds by the City of Minneapolis.
Member Housh inquired whether he should recuse himself from the discussion and final motion
because he serves as a volunteer on the Board of Directors of Fairview Southdale. Attorney
Gilligan advised Mr. Housh he had no conflict and could fully participate in the discussion and
voting.
Member Masica asked what was the total dollar amount of the bond issue. Mr. Gilligan
responded it was approximately $490 million of all the Fairview bonds from Minneapolis. The
Edina portion for remodeling would be approximately $35 million with the refunding portion at
Page 12
Minutes/Edina City Council/April 5, 2005.
approximately $20. or $25 million. Proposed projects are for Fairview Hospitals in Red Wing,
Hibbing, Princeton and Wyoming and Minneapolis.
Brent William, Vice President of Finance for Fairview Southdale Hospital, said the main use of
the funding for Fairview Southdale would be to update /upgrade peri- operative services as well
as to acquire 32 additional beds. No changes will be apparent on the building exterior.
Member Swenson made a motion closing the public hearing, seconded by Member Masica.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
Member Masica introduced the following resolution and moved its approval:
RESOLUTON NO. 2005-24
APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS BY THE CITY OF
MINNEAPOLIS ON BEHALF OF FAIRVIEW HEALTH
SERVICES UNDER THE MINNESOTA STATUTES,. SECTIONS
469.152 TO 469.165
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City
of Edina "), as follows:
SECTION 1
Recitals and Findings
1.1. This Council has received a proposal from. Fairview Health Services, a
Minnesota nonprofit corporation ( "Fairview "), that the City of Edina authorize the City of
Minneapolis, Minnesota (the "City of Minneapolis ") to issue bonds under Minnesota Statutes,
Sections 469.152 through 469.165 (the "Act ") to finance the remodeling of portions of Fairview
Southdale Hospital in the City, and the acquisition and installation of. items of equipment
therein (the "Project "), and to refund the Health Care System Revenue Bonds, Series 1997
(Fairview Hospital and Healthcare Services) and the Health Care System Revenue Bonds,
Series 2000A (Fairview Health Services) of the Minnesota Agricultural and Economic
Development Board (the "Refunding "), a portion of the proceeds of which were used finance
improvements to Fairview Southdale Hospital and the acquisition and installation of items of
equipment therein.
1.2. At a public hearing held on April 5, 2005, all parties who appeared at the
hearing were given an opportunity to express their views with respect to the proposal to
finance the Project and provide for the Refunding through the issuance of revenue bonds
under the Act by the City of Minneapolis and interested persons were given the opportunity
to submit written comments to the City Clerk before the time of the hearing.
SECTION 2
Approvals
2.1. The issuance of bonds by the City of Minneapolis, pursuant to the Act to
finance the Project and provide fro the Refunding, is hereby consented to and approved. The
terms of the bonds shall be as are approved by the Minneapolis City Council.
2.2. The Mayor and City Manager and other officers of the City of Edina are
authorized and directed to furnish to Fairview, the City of Minneapolis and the attorneys
rendering an opinion on the issuance of the bonds, certified copies of all proceedings and
records of the City of Edina relating to the bonds and such other affidavits and certificates as
may be required to show the facts relating to the legality and marketability of the bonds as
such facts appear from the books and records in the officer's custody and control or as
otherwise known to them; and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including
Page 13
Minutes/Edina Cam. Council/April 5, 2005.
any heretofore furnished, shall constitute representations of the City of Edina as to the truth of
all statements contained therein.
Adopted this 5th day of April, 2005. Member Swenson seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting
adjourned at 10:55 P.M.
City Clerk
Page 14
)r
MINUTES
OF THE MEETING OF THE
EDINA BOARD OF REVIEW HELD AT CITY HALL
APRIL 11, 2005, AT 5:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, and Mayor
Hovland.
The meeting was convened pursuant to published Notice of Board of Review in the Edina Sun -
Current and notice posted on City bulletin boards for the purpose of hearing those persons who
considered themselves aggrieved by their property valuation for assessment purposes, or who were
requesting homestead classification.
Mayor Hovland stated no decision would be made at this meeting, but would take place at the
continuation meeting of the Board on April 25, 2005. He added that property owners would be
notified of the Board's decision within twenty days. Further appeal may be made to the Hennepin
'County Board of Equalization beginning June 13, 2005.
The following property owners appeared personally or were represented before the Board to object to
the Assessor's estimated market value as of January 2, 2005:
Name
Address
PID Number
2005 Original Est.
Owners'
Requested
Value
Market Value
Mark & Usha Abramovitz
6804 Brook Drive
05- 116 -21-44 - 0041
$452,800
$415,470
Richard N & Laura B Kuyath
6103 Jeffrey Lane
32- 117- 21 -23- 003
$473,500
$400,000
The Council heard the owners present their reasons for requesting reductions and in some cases,
asked questions clarifying issues.
The owners of the following properties submitted applications or letters objecting to their market
value and requested the Board's review, however, the owners did not appear personally:
Name
Address
PID Number
2005 Original Est,
Owners'
Requested
Value
Market Value
Marie M Anderegg
5848 Creek Valley Road
05- 116- 21 -24- 0004
$406,800
$365,000
Joan McMillan
7601 Edinborough Way #
6105
32- 028 -24-34 -0706
$178,000
$100,000
Cheryl & Christopher Pedrohe
6307 Colonial Court
05- 116 -21 -11 -0100
$397,800
Not specified
Richard & Kathy Elkin
421 Tyler Ave
30- 117 -21 -12 -0079
$286,400
$250,000 - $265,000
Bruce D & Susan Lee
McCarthy
6708 Point Drive
30- 028 -24-42 -0024
$807,800
$742,000
Bradley Bakke Apartment Prop
5400 West 77th St
08- 116 -21 -11 -0018
$1,835,500
Not specified
Bradley Bakke Apartment Prop
4301 Valley View Road
30- 028 -24 -12 -0063
$557,800
Not specified
Minutes/Edina Board of Review /April 11, 2005
Bradley Bakke Apartment Prop
5330 France Ave S
18- 028 -24 -44 -0113
$959,300
Not specified
Jim Maciej Industrial Prop
ain Street Partners, LLP
444 West 76th St
31- 028 -24-41 -0008
$1,689,000
$1,225,000
Ray & Patricia DeMont
7400 Edinborough Way
#5308
32- 028 -24 -32 -0474
$313,400
$293,600
Cathy McKay
5615 Schaefer Road
31- 117 -21 -14 -0037
$1,010,800
Not specified
Virginia S Thomas
6228 Parkwood Road
31- 117 -21 -11 -0001
$698,500
Not specified
Mayor Hovland made a motion closing the public hearing for the 2003 Edina Board of Review and
recessing the Board of Review until April 25, 2005 at 5:00 p.m. in the Edina City Council
Chambers. Member Housh seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
City Clerk
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
TO: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # II. A.
From: Wayne D. Houle, PE - Consent ❑.
City Engineer Information Only ❑
Date: April 19, 2005 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
® To Council
Subject: Public Hearing for Schaefer Action ® Motion
Road— Roadway ® Resolution
improvement No. A -216
❑ Ordinance
1-1 Discussion
Recommendation:
If the Council determines the project to be warranted and necessary, Council shall adopt a
resolution approving Schaefer Road Roadway Improvements, City Improvement No. A -216,
authorize plans and specifications to be completed and bids taken. This project will require a 4/5
favorable vote from the Council to move the project forward.
Info /Background:
This project was initiated by staff from a resident request to address ongoing drainage problems
along the roadway. Staff expanded the project to include reconstructing the roadway after reviewing
the pavement condition. The existing storm sewer at Harold Woods Lane will be extended to the
south .to accommodate the many sump pumps that are currently draining along this roadway. No
concrete curb and gutter is proposed along this roadway.
The estimated roadway construction cost is $188,000. This cost does not include costs for the
storm sewer or other City utility repairs; staff is analyzing these repairs and will include them with
final plans; funding for these repairs will be funded through the respective utility funds. Funding for
the roadway will be from a special assessment of approximately $9,400 per residential equivalent
unit (REU).
The Feasibility Study is included with this report, along with all correspondence received to date.
Staff analyzed the project and feels that the project is feasible from an engineering standpoint.
GAEngineering \Improvements\A216 Schaefer Road \CORRESPONDENCE \Misc \RRpublic hearing - A216.doc
4291N�,1
o� e FEASIBILITY STUDY — A216
J .ay ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
• "UnUa �• CITY OF EDINA
STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
SCHAEFER ROAD
MARCH 31, 2005
LOCATION:
The Schaefer Road project extends from Interlachen Boulevard to Westwood
Court (see Figure 1).
35 4900 4901
4920 .21
4904
6516 4905 4924 25 6408 6400
6520 4928 :41729 6424 4.909
IN TERLACNEN 13j -Yg__
6308 6304
8300
cy, 6228
!�- 8224
6328 8212
6320
5004 6201
6321
5011
5017 5012 - . .u..
Project
5021 Boundary
5r.o „09
5021 5025 5101
5025 5020
6519 6501
6401
5224
6413
8409 6405
3
3009
5117
5116
5125
5004
5012 �
.5013
5201 6220
6212 6208
5016
5021
5008
5020
6200
6404
5216
0025
5012
5100
WO
5321 5311
6501HAROLD
6313 16
6405
5106
5016
109
5112
5116
5117
5120
5125
5152
5200
5201 5204
5200
5200
5204
5210
5205
_
5212
5209
5211
15
5216
5215
,224
11 5215
5220
5219
P 23 5219
5224
_
5223
6227 5231
5228
5304
5305 6404 6400
5227
5308
5309
5234 5238
5301
6401
6605
6416 6412
X5 00
6424 6420
6308 6304
8300
cy, 6228
!�- 8224
6328 8212
6320
5004 6201
6321
5011
5017 5012 - . .u..
Project
5021 Boundary
5r.o „09
5021 5025 5101
5025 5020
5225
5224
5It3 5100
5224
5017 5020
5111v
5024 511 1
_
5117
5116
5125
5124
•
5200 j
5201 6220
6212 6208
5204
ESTW000 C T
i
6204
5209 6231
6200
5217 6229
6225 6221 6217 6215 6209
5216
5220
5225
5224
5221
5224
5228
5225
6300 6304 6308
•
5300
5304
ESTW000 C T
5301
5308
6312
6301
5304
5331
5321 5311
5316
6313 16
5
&109 5312 53
—..._ �. 6320 5320 5324
Figure 1. Protect Area Map
Feasibility Study
Schaefer Road Imp. No. A -216
March 31, 2005
INITIATION & ISSUES: The Schaefer Road project was initiated partially by a resident request to
address drainage problems along the roadway. The Engineering Department
expanded this area and included the neighborhood as outlined in Figure 1 as
part of the City's planning process to update the infrastructure within this
neighborhood.
The following are existing features that present issues in determining the
feasibility of the project and are addressed in this report:
• Surface rainwater drainage issues
• Poor condition of existing pavement
• Existing landscaping, retaining walls, driveways, etc.
• Existing mature trees
EXISTING CONDITIONS: The roadway in this neighborhood was previously re- constructed in the early
1970's and the utilities (sanitary sewer, storm sewer and watermain) were
installed ranging from 1965 to 1993. The roadway width along Schaefer Road
varies from 27 -ft to 30 -ft with no curb and gutter and no sidewalks. The
pavement on Schaefer Road is in generally poor condition with very poor
conditions experienced along the edge of the roadways in many locations
(see Photo 1). The pavement throughout this neighborhood appears to be
approaching the end of its useful life while the costs to maintain and repair
the roadways are steadily increasing.
Photo 1. Existing Pavement Condition & Drainage Issues
Page 2 of 6
Feasibility Study
Schaefer Road Imp. No. A -216
March 31, 2005
Schaefer Road generally consists of rolling terrain varying from 0.5% to 5.3%
slopes. There is some existing storm sewer in the area, but overall the
surface drainage is relatively poor with erosion problems along the edge of
the roadway in certain areas. The roadway remains in a wet condition most
of the summer due to the amount of sump pump discharge onto the roadway.
Watermain /water service breaks and sanitary sewer blockage occurrences
have been reported as minimal in this area. The private utilities in this
neighborhood are located both overhead and underground. Street lighting
consists of standard "cobra head" lights mounted on wood poles that are
located intermittently along Schaefer Road.
PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS: This project involves reconstructing the existing bituminous pavement and
base, replacing fire hydrants, and extending the storm sewer to
accommodate new sump pump drain tile where needed to allow the property
owners to connect their sump pump discharges directly into the storm sewer
system. This will eliminate the adjacent sump pump discharge directly onto
the roadway.
A neighborhood informational meeting was held on November 15, 200 4
gather data and answe r
project. Approximately
Schaefer Road.
questions the homeowners had relating to
four residents attended this meeting residing
to
the
on
A neighborhood survey was sent to learn the favorability of installing
decorative streetlights with this project and the favorability of installing traffic
calming measures in response to comments received at the information
meeting. Input from the survey and comments received throughout the
planning of this project have been included in this report as an attachment.
The results of the survey are shown in Table 1.
*Note: Based on a 1 to 3 ranking system. Traditional was most favored with the lowest
average ranking of 1.5. Only two returned surveys indicated rankings for lighting.
Table 1. Survey Results
The following is a summary regarding the survey results including staff's
recommendations:
• The majority of residents do not prefer installing decorative street lighting
— Staff does not recommend including decorative street lighting with this
project since the improvement is overwhelmingly not supported by the
property owners and a direct benefit to each property for this
improvement is difficult to substantiate.
Page 3 of 6
Returned
Prefer Decorative Street Lights
Prefer Traffic
Calming Measures
Total Surveys
Surveys
Yes
No
I Style*
Yes
No
Sent
Colonial
Acorn
Traditional
22
1 11
1
10
1 2.5
2
1.5
6
4
of Returned Surveys
1 50%
9%
91%
55%
36%
*Note: Based on a 1 to 3 ranking system. Traditional was most favored with the lowest
average ranking of 1.5. Only two returned surveys indicated rankings for lighting.
Table 1. Survey Results
The following is a summary regarding the survey results including staff's
recommendations:
• The majority of residents do not prefer installing decorative street lighting
— Staff does not recommend including decorative street lighting with this
project since the improvement is overwhelmingly not supported by the
property owners and a direct benefit to each property for this
improvement is difficult to substantiate.
Page 3 of 6
Feasibility Study
Schaefer Road Imp. No. A -216
March 31, 2005
• The majority of residents prefer implementing traffic calming measures in
this neighborhood — A traffic survey was performed on Schaefer Road in
July 1999. The Monday through Friday average daily traffic volume was
1,049 vehicles per day and the 85`h- percentile speed was 34.5 mph. The
vehicle volume is relatively high for a local road with speeds exceeding 30
mph; however, these volumes and speeds are very typical throughout
Edina neighborhoods on local roadways. Staff recommends the residents
file an application for traffic calming in accordance with the Transportation
Commission Policy and the Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan. It is
not anticipated that traffic calming measures would be included with this
construction project due to the procedure and schedule as outlined in the
Policy.
The proposed roadway width is 28 -ft, which closely matches the existing
width and helps minimize impacts to the surrounding topography and
landscaping features (see Figure 2). Trees will be protected and impacts to
the trees will be minimized.
Figure 2. Proposed Project Layout
Staff is continuing to analyze the utility repairs /replacements and will include
the needed improvements with the final plans. Other utility activities may
include replacement of gas mains within the neighborhood, which is
determined and coordinated by the local gas utility company.
Page 4 of 6
1.
Feasibility Study
Schaefer Road Imp. No. A -216
March 31, 2005
RIGHT -OF -WAY
& EASEMENTS The right -of -way along Schaefer Road is typically 60 feet wide. All proposed
improvements stay within this right -of -way and no additional easement
requirements are anticipated.
FEASIBILITY: This project is feasible from an engineering and City standpoint.
PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $188,000. The total cost includes
indirect costs of 15% for engineering and clerical costs and 7.5% for first year
finance costs. The estimated construction cost does not include storm sewer
or other utility improvements. Final utility improvements will be determined
during the final design and will be funded through the respective utility fund.
Funding for the entire project will be from a combination of special
assessment and utility funds.
ASSESSMENTS: A special assessment of approximately $9,400 per residential equivalent
unit or assessable lot will be levied against residents adjacent to the
neighborhood's roadways. The justification for assessments is attributed to
properties receiving benefit of the new pavement. The assessable lot is
based on a detached single family home. Properties that abut the project and
have access with their side or rear yards will be assessed 1/3 of the
assessable unit cost (see Figure 3).
PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule is feasible from an Engineering standpoint:
ATTACHMENTS:
Council Orders Public Hearing .......... ..........................March 15, 2005
Receive Feasibility Report .................... ..........................April 5, 2005
Public Hearing ........................... ...... .......................... April 19, 2005
Bid Opening ........ ............................... ............................May 2005
Award Contract ..... ............................... ...........................June 2005
Begin Construction .......................... ............................... June 2005
Complete Construction ......................... ........................October 2005
• Information Meeting Attendance List and Comments
• Survey Results and Comments
• Preliminary Assessment Roll
Page 5 of 6
Feasibility Study
Schaefer Road Imp. No. A -216
March 31, 2005
6535 4900 4901 -
4920 L4251 6300
4904 6228
329 6516 4905 6408 6400 4924 6224
28 6212
131 6520 6424 4909 '
6320 8228 - --- - - - - -
INTERLACHEN
■ e201
29 654 6519 6501 6401 = 5004
6321
3 5001 6413 6409 6405 •
5009
t
5004
5012 5013 5011
■ 501
5016 W21 5008 5017 5020
Project
BOZO 6404 5021 = Boundary
5025 5012 i 5f n o009
5100 6501 HAROLD WO N = 5020 5021 5025 5101
5025
5101 �� •
5108
6405 i■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■y Sim
0 5016
5113 3 5108
5109 � = 5111
5112 _ j 5017 5020
5024 5112
� ■ ■ ■. ■ ■. ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■N� 5117
5116 5117 5117
� = 5116
5120 9 5125 5152 W 5125 5124
Nuu ■ ■y uLLj
i 5200
17201 5204 =
52 5210 5200 : 5200 5201 6220 6212 6208
5204
5205 Y ■ ■. ■ ■ ■■� - - �. ■..N. ■N ■ ■■ 6204 6200
5212
5209 6231
� iii
5209 52110 V622
IS
5216 5217 6225 6221 6217 6215 6209 5216
11 5215 5215 i 5224 5220
5220 = 5225 5224 5221 5224
5219= 1224 + ■.■N ■ ■■N ■. ■■ ■■ ■■.
'23 5219 5224 • ■ 5228 5225 5300
5223 = ` 6300 : 6304 6308
5227 5231 �~�■■■■■■ ■�■■��■4a�■■��■ Lasno■■■i 5300 5304
5228 5304 5305 6404 6400 WESTWOOD CT 5301 5308
5227 12
6301 6 6304
5308 5309
5234 5238 5301 Assessments
8401
6416 6412
6405 6313 6 -16 5331 $3,150.00 SF
7504 8500 8424 6420
6409 5312 $9,400.00 53
n53
Figure 3. Preliminary Assessment Map
Page 6 of 6
SIGN IN SHEET - IN &MATION MEETING
W.� and Ridge Rd.
November 15, 2004
(Please print legibly - Thank you!)
..
N' �
L,
r`/ /
.l. •_ .� • • . � '.'IAu'1A.1: : /V:i 1}I%3.bli ji'p�1�_'
rail,
mill'
�W Ara
W. Me MR %
Ph
e4 '�+zW L
QUESTION / COMMENT CARD
uld + er imhblevn av\,a efoS(on ALL,%' lb MawaU 6Y\
Name T)i Q nt Address
PLEASE PRINT PLEASE PRINT
ca
QUESTION / COMMENT CARD
Name Ma the S�� K Address 5 0 I aer RJ
PLEASE PRINT PLEASE PRINT
9y5 - 93-7c)
Phone Conversation on November 17, 2004 Steve L.
Ed Glickman 952- 935 -0625 5217 Schaefer Rd.
• DRAIN TILE /STORM SEWER WILL BE INSTALLED WITH RDWY PROJECT TO
ACCOMMODATE HIS BACKYARD POND PUMPING ONTO THE STREET.
• WOULD LIKE US TO TAKE A LOOK AT PONDING THAT OCCURS IN HIS FRONT
YARD. CURRENTLY AN INFILTRATION TYPE SYSTEM. HE MAY POSSIBLY PUT
IN A SUMP PUMP.
• DISCUSSED A HUGE 200 YR OLD COTTON WOOD TREE.
• HIS NEIGHBOR (HARRY) HAS A HUGE OAK. ROOTS GROWING INTO STREET.
SUGGESTED PUTTING A FLAG ON THE TREE SO WE KNOW NOT TO IMPACT
IT.
• WOULD LIKE HIS NEIGHBOR (5209 SCHAEFER RD) TO DIRECT HIS WATER TO
THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM IN THE STREET (NEW STORM SEWER) AND NOT
TO HIS PROPERTY.
Schaefer Road Improvements
Improvement No. A -216
SURVEY RESULTS.
NO
STREET
Returned
Decorative Street Lights
TRAFFIC CALMING
COMMENTS
Survey
Yes
I No
Style
Yes
No
Colonial
Acorn
Traditional
5004
SCHAEFER RD
5008
SCHAEFER RD
X
X*
X**
*Don't want, but if to be, the one that gives the best light; * *Speed
bump between 5004 and 5008 Schaefer Rd. The knoll makes these
five driveways somewhat blind and the traffic is sometimes fast.
There have been some very dose calls.
5011
SCHAEFER RD
X
X
X
We need some sort of traffic calming on Schaefer Rd, please
consider implementing.
5012
SCHAEFER RD
5016
SCHAEFER RD
5017
SCHAEFER RD
X
X
X
Schaefer is a racetrack!
5021
SCHAEFER RD
X
X
2
3
1
X
Speeders going 40-50 mph going down the hill between 5021 and
15217 Schaefer Rd. This happens fre uentl 1
5025
SCHAEFER RD
5113
SCHAEFER RD
5117
SCHAEFER RD
X
X
Cars do frequently exceed speed limit on this street - often by as
much as 20 mph, but I don't know how best to slow vehicles down.
5125
SCHAEFER RD
X
X
X
5152
SCHAEFER RD
5200
SCHAEFER RD
5201
SCHAEFER RD
X
X
X*
*That was done years ago on the comer of Knoll Dr and Schaefer. I
was a disaster and quickly removed by a good sense council I
believe.
5209
SCHAEFER RD
X
X
X
5217
SCHAEFER RD
X
X
X
5224
SCHAEFER RD
5224
SCHAEFER RD
5225
SCHAEFER RD
X
X
X
Oppose entire project, see letter.
6300
WESTWOOD CT
X
X
3
1
2
X
RE: Rainwater drainage: It is my- opinion that in the past a
resident(s) has taken advantage of the city to drain water from a
pond because of overflowing due to rain. It was dearly not an
instance of the water causing damage to the home. It is not our
obligation to pay for a problem caused by a personal choice in
landscaping and a desire for improved aesthetics. This is more
aggravating knowing that this resident also runs water into the pond
24 hours a day when the water level is too low.
6321
INTERLACHEN BLVD
6401
INTERLACHEN BLVD
Returned
Prefer Decorative Street Lights
Prefer Traffic
Calming Measures
Total Surveys
Surveys
Yes
No
e*
Yes
I No
Sent
Colonial
Acorn
ITraciftnall
22
1 Ti-
1
1 10
2.5
2
1.5
6
4
% of Returned Surveys
50%
9%
191%
55%
36%
Note: *Avora a Rankin
from 1 to 3
- Only 2 retumed surveys
included rankings
Z).o-c P7, z.o o 4
cjo
S .ew ems.
a s S e. s s #un is q w e. O�rn,' tea. E�7. ', �_ Yiz&4
v ajf is `nor
t. o- h-?.es n 2 t e. S S-J^q
®ppose � - �1�[��. ��oJe-ct.
d�
SaaS Sc:4ae
PRELIMINARY
ASSESSMENT ROLL
SCHAEFER ROAD IMPROVEMENT A -216
CITY OF EDINA
STREET
PID #
LEGAL
STREET
NO.
OWNER
ASSESSABLE LOTS
LOT
BLOCK
TOTAL
LOTS
ASSESSMENT COST
A
Interlachen Blvd
30- 117 -2141 -0026
1
1
6321
Boehland, Thomas & Kim
0.333333
$ 3,133.33
30- 117 -21 -42-0018
4
11
6401
Aanenson, Vernon
0.333333
$ 3,133.33
Schaefer Rd
30- 117 -21.41 -0027
2
1
5011
Schultz, Scott & Martha
1
$ 9,400.00
30- 117 -21-41 -0028
3
1
5017
Macneil Patricia
1
$ 9,400.00
30- 117 -21 -41 -0004
pt 27
5021
Me r Franz
1
$ 9,400.00
30- 117 -21 -41 -0030
26
5025
Drobn , Jeffrey
1
$ 9,400.00
30- 117 -21 -41 -0029
25
5113
Schulze. Richard
1
$ 9,400.00
30- 117 -21 -41 -0002
24
5117
ISanderson, Paul & Janet
1
$ 9,400.00
30 -117 -21-41 -0001
23
5125
Smith Kevin & Pamela
1
9,400.00
30- 117 -21- 44-0004
22
5201
Kyllo, John & Carole
1
$ 9,400.00
30- 117 -21-44 -0065
1
1
5209
Emerson Thomas & Zoneida
1
$ 9,400.00
30- 117 -21 -44 -0059
5
1
5217
Glickman Edward
1
$ 9,400.00
30- 117 -21-44 -0001
19
5225
Dinwlddie, Harry & Barbara
1
$ 9,400.00
30- 117 -21-43 -0004
14
5224
Weiner, Howard
1
9400.00
30- 117 -21 -43-0003
13
5224
Weiner, Howard
1
$ 9,400.00
30- 117 -21 -43-0063
2
1
5200
Thomas, James & Dianne
1
$ 9,400.00
30- 117 -21 -42 -0036
1
1
5152
Schall, David & Patricia
1
$ 9,400.00
30- 117 -21 -42-0022
1
1
5016
Young, Evelyn
1
$ 9,400.00
30- 117 -21 -42 -0021
2
1
5012
Rich Jeffrey & Amy
1
$ 9,400.00
30- 117 -21 -42 -0020
1
1
5008
Nelson Jr Bernard & Joan
1
$ 9,400.00
30- 117 -21 -42 -0019
1 5
1
5004
Johnson, Roger
1$
9.400.001
Westwood Ct
30- 117 -21-44 -0024
1 11
1
6300
1 Larson, Cliffeord & Lucy 1
0.333333
$ 3,1
20 $ 188,c
TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 188,000.00
AVERAGE COST PER LOT $ 9,400.00
A-219 AssessmeMa_ Feasift Page 1 1.45 PM3f31R005
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Wayne D. Houle, PE
City Engineer
Date: April 19, 2005
Subject: Public Hearing for Schaefer
Circle — Roadway
Improvement No. A -217
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # II. B.
0 Consent El Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
® To Council
Action ® Motion
® Resolution
Ordinance„
Discussion
If the Council determines the project to be warranted and necessary, Council shall adopt a
resolution approving Schaefer Circle Roadway Improvements, City Improvement No. A -217,
authorize plans and specifications to be completed and bids taken. This project will require a 4/5
favorable vote from the Council to move the project forward.
Info /Background:
This project was initiated by staff from a resident request to address drainage problems at the east
end of the cul -de -sac along with concerns on the pavement condition of the roadway. After review
of the current water system, staff expanded the project to include adding a watermain to this project.
This project does not include the addition of concrete curb and gutter.
The estimated roadway construction cost is $68,000. This cost does not include costs for the
watermain or other City utility repairs; staff is analyzing these repairs and will include them with final
plans; funding for these repairs will be funded through the respective utility funds. The costs of the
roadway remain the same if the watermain is or is not installed. Funding for the roadway will be
from a special assessment of approximately $8,500, per residential equivalent unit (REU).
The Feasibility Study is included with this report, along with all correspondence received to date.
Staff analyzed the project and feels that the project is feasible from an engineering standpoint.
G: \Engineering \lmprovements\A217 Schaefer Circle \CORRESPONDENCE \Misc \RRpublic hearing - A217.doc
w9jA,l
o� e X.vi FEASIBILITY STUDY — A217
�o ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF EDINA
STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
SCHAEFER CIRCLE
MARCH 31, 2005
LOCATION: The Schaefer Circle project includes the neighborhood east of Schaefer Road
(see Figure 1).
05 5704 5709 5706
5708
5708 5713 Project 5710
u 5712
Bondary
5714
5712 5717 """ 5716
6204
6208 5718
5716 6216 6212
: 6201
gGNAE
Ea Ok
800 6209
6217 6213
9
5804
�O� P
z
b
J 5810
809-
11
Figure 1. Project Area Map
Feasibility Study
Schaefer Circle Imp. No. A -217
March 31, 2005
INITIATION & ISSUES: The Schaefer Circle project was initiated partially by a resident request to
address drainage problems at the east end of the cul -de -sac. The
Engineering Department expanded this area and included the neighborhood
as outlined in Figure 1 as part of the City's planning process to update the
infrastructure within this neighborhood.
The following are existing features that present issues in determining the
feasibility of the project and are addressed in this report:
• Surface rainwater drainage issues
• No existing watermain in Schaefer Circle
• Residents experience "brown water" problems
• Poor condition of existing pavement
• Existing landscaping, mailboxes, driveways, etc.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: The roadway in this neighborhood was originally constructed in the early 1960's,
the sanitary sewer was installed in 1959 and the water services were installed in
1969 and 1977. The roadway width varies ranging from 26 -ft to 29 -ft with no
curb and gutter and no sidewalks. The pavement condition varies but is in
very poor condition overall (see Photo 1).
Photo 1. Existing Pavement Condition
Street grades within the neighborhood are relatively flat in the cul -de -sac with
a steeper sloping roadway on the west end. Typical features exist adjacent
to the roadway such as retaining walls, concrete driveways, landscaping,
shrubs, trees and mailboxes. There is some existing storm sewer in the area
with isolated surface drainage problems.
Currently, no watermain exists in Schaefer Circle. Multiple residents are
served from single water service lines and /or from the water main located in
Page 2 of 6
Feasibility Study
Schaefer Circle Imp. No. A -217
March 31, 2005
Vernon Avenue. Due to multiple residents using a single service that is not
looped, some residents experience "brown water' conditions. No sanitary
sewer blockages have been reported. Most of the private utilities in this
neighborhood are overhead and serve the residents from the back of the
properties with the exception of the gas lines, which are buried in the
roadway.
PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS: This project involves reconstructing the existing bituminous pavement,
installing new watermain, repairing sanitary sewer as needed, and replacing
the water services from the new watermain to the curb boxes (valves located
at the property lines).
A neighborhood informational meeting was held on November 15, 2005 to
gather data and answer questions the homeowners had relating to the
project. Approximately six residents attended this meeting.
A neighborhood survey was sent to learn the favorability of constructing
concrete curb and gutters and installing decorative street lights with this
project. Input from the survey and comments received throughout the
planning of this project have been included in this report as an attachment.
The results of the survey are shown in Table 1.
Note: ' 3 surveys responded and ranked Traditional No. 1 - no others were ranked
Table 1. Survey Results
The following is a summary regarding the survey results including staff's
recommendations:
The majority of residents do not prefer new concrete curb and gutter —
Reasons to construct concrete curb and gutter in this neighborhood
include: concrete curb and gutter tends to be more cost effective over the
life of the street, reduces pavement failure, provides safety, controls
drainage, provides driveway and traffic control, prevents roadway edge
rutting, prevents boulevard damage, and aids cleaning and snow plowing.
Although staff recommends constructing concrete curb and gutter in this
neighborhood, it is feasible to partially improve the roadway without
including concrete curb and gutter with this project. (The cost estimate
and assessment amount included in the report do not include curb and
gutter costs.)
Page 3 of 6
Returned
Prefer Curb &
Gutter
Prefer Decorative Street Lights
Total Surveys
Surveys
Yes
No
B -HEAD
S -MOUNT
Yes
No
Style
Sent
Colonial
Acorn
Traditional
8
8
1
7
1
1
2
6
of Returned Surveys
100%
12%
88%
25%
75%
Note: ' 3 surveys responded and ranked Traditional No. 1 - no others were ranked
Table 1. Survey Results
The following is a summary regarding the survey results including staff's
recommendations:
The majority of residents do not prefer new concrete curb and gutter —
Reasons to construct concrete curb and gutter in this neighborhood
include: concrete curb and gutter tends to be more cost effective over the
life of the street, reduces pavement failure, provides safety, controls
drainage, provides driveway and traffic control, prevents roadway edge
rutting, prevents boulevard damage, and aids cleaning and snow plowing.
Although staff recommends constructing concrete curb and gutter in this
neighborhood, it is feasible to partially improve the roadway without
including concrete curb and gutter with this project. (The cost estimate
and assessment amount included in the report do not include curb and
gutter costs.)
Page 3 of 6
Feasibility Study
Schaefer Circle Imp. No. A -217
March 31, 2005
• The majority of residents do not prefer installing decorative street lighting
— Staff does not recommend including decorative street lighting with this
project since lighting is not supported by the property owners and a direct
benefit to each property for this improvement is difficult to substantiate.
The pavement throughout this neighborhood appears to be at the end of its
useful life while the costs to maintain and repair the roadways are steadily
increasing. Overlaying or seal coating the pavement in this neighborhood is
not feasible.
The proposed roadway width is 27 -ft, which closely matches the existing
width and helps minimize impacts to the surrounding topography and
landscaping features (see Figure 2). Trees will be protected and impacts to
the trees will be minimized.
-
I + '
M
RIGHT -OF -WAY
& EASEMENTS
f�
u
P
Figure 2. Proposed Project Layout
.i
- �f!
Staff is continuing to analyze the utility repairs /replacements and will include
the needed improvements with the final plans. Other utility activities may
include replacement of gas mains within the neighborhood, which is
determined and coordinated by the local gas utility company.
The right -of -way along Schaefer Road is 60 -ft wide (60 -ft radius in the cul -de-
sac). All proposed roadway improvements stay within this right -of -way.
However, existing City utilities located in Schaefer Circle connect across the
properties in the southeast corner of the cul -de -sac to utilities located in
Vernon Avenue. No record of an existing easement for these utilities has
Page 4 of 6
Feasibility Study
Schaefer Circle Imp. No. A -217
March 31, 2005
been discovered to date. It is anticipated that a permanent drainage and
utility easement will be required from the adjacent property owners to install
the new watermain in Schaefer Circle and loop it between the existing
watermain located in Schaefer Road and Vernon Avenue. The necessary
easements will be obtained as required.
FEASIBILITY: This project is feasible from an engineering and City standpoint.
PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $68,000. The total cost includes indirect
costs of 15% for engineering and clerical costs and 7.5% for first year finance
costs. The estimated construction cost does not include storm sewer,
watermain or utility improvements. New watermain is anticipated to be
installed in this neighborhood; however, the final utility improvements will be
determined during the final design and will be funded through the respective
utility fund. Funding for the entire project will be from a combination of
special assessment and utility funds.
ASSESSMENTS: A special assessment of approximately $8,500 per residential equivalent
unit or assessable lot will be levied against residents adjacent to the
neighborhood's roadways (see Figure 3). The justification for assessments is
attributed to properties, receiving benefit of the new pavement. The
assessable lot is based on a detached single family home. A 10 -year
payback period for these special assessments is proposed for this project.
PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule is feasible from an Engineering standpoint:
ATTACHMENTS:
Council Orders Public Hearing .......... ..........................March 15, 2005
Receive Feasibility Report ............... ............................... April 5, 2005
Public Hearing ... ........................:...... .........................April 19, 2005
BidOpening .................................... ............................... May 2005
Award .Contract .......................... ............................... Summer 2005
Begin Construction ..................... ............................... Summer 2005
Complete Construction ... ............................... Fall 2005 /Summer 2006
Note: The schedule is dependent on obtaining an easement for the
watermain.
• Information Meeting Attendance List and Comments
• Survey Results and Comments
• Preliminary Assessment Roll
Page 5 of 6
Feasibility Study
Schaefer Circle Imp. No. A -217
March 31, 2005
.d i v-r
705 5704 5709 5706
9 5708
5708 5713 5710
Project 5712
Boundary
5714
5712 �a 5717,,•.....6865 ................... ,,5716
�� 6208 6204 °••,�5,�� 5718
5716
6216 6212 ,••.�
s
6201 ••.••�'
SCNA�F�It C1R ••••••
1800 6209 .•
6217 ••'
6213 .�• °'•
5804 �,�� `'�►•• °•••
5810
809-
Figure 3. Preliminary Assessment Map
Page 6 of 6
SIGN IN SHEET - IN &MATION MEETING
Schaefer Circle
November 15, 2004
(Please print legibly - Thank you!)
Name(s)
Address
3.
4.
Z 1 7 6v
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
Phi Caft ► (It glo
QUESTION / COMMENT CARD
gtNe L .
Also ,�.est�v� ecQ AD- {�� ,�� sf��l, �� necv
Name as kq Address �OZy� �c �ae'K( Crc Ie-
PLEASE PRfNT PLEASE PRINT
QUESTION / COMMENT CARD
r
Nam r Address l D `! 5 h -a ege r Lt r'
PLEASE PRINf PLEASE PRINT
SCHAEFEr% %;IRCLE
IMPROVEMENT NO. A -217
SURVEY RESULTS
NO
STREET
Returned
Preferred Curb & Gutter
Decorative Street Lights
COMMENTS
Survey
Yes
No
B -HEAD
S -MOUNT
Yes
No
Style
Colonial
Acorn
Traditional
6201
SCHAEFER CIR
X
X
X
6204
SCHAEFER CIR
X
X
X
6208
SCHAEFER CIR
X
X
X
X
1
We are very interested in burying the power
lines.
6209
SCHAEFER CIR
X
X
X
X
1
We are in favor of a new street - perhaps
C &G, but not upgrade every one elses
waterline. We would not benefit from it. We
hooked up to city water directly from Vernon
and no one on our street helped pay for it.
6212
SCHAEFER CIR
X
X
X
I would prefer that this project not take place
at all. Resurfacing the road would be fine,
but I am totally against the water and utility
improvement part of the project.
6213
SCHAEFER CIR
X
X
X
Letter attached.
6216
SCHAEFER CIR
X
X
X
1
1
I am on a comer lot and would probably have
to pay once for Schaefer Cir and then again
for Schaefer Rd construction. The darkness
is most upsetting. It is dangerous and a
security risk. Thank you.
6217
SCHAEFER CIR
X
X
X
Total Surveys
Returned
Prefer Curb & Gutter
Prefer Decorative
Street Lights
Survey
Yes
No
B -HEAD
S-MOUNT
Yes
No
Style•
Sent
Colonial
Acom
Traditional
8
8
1
7
1
1
2
6
0
0
1
% of Returned Surveys
100%
12.50%
87.50%
25%
75%
Note:' 3 surveys responded and ranked Traditional
No. 1 - no others
were ranked
M . - Z" -
Hasbargen
6213 Schaefer circle
Edina, MN 55436
952 - 932 -0877
Mr. Steven L. Lillehaug
Edina Traffic Engineer /Assistant Engineer
City Hall
4801 west 5011' Street
Edina, MN 55424
rte: Improvement No. A -217
Schaefer Circle
Dear Mr. Lillehaug:
This is in reference to the above mentioned road
improvement on Schaefer Circle. For the record, we are
against the improvements mentioned in your letter, dated
December 9, 2004. For a road, which has limited traffic,
the amount mentioned for this project seems outlandish. we
are also hard pressed to understand why resurfacing the
road is not covered by our taxes. we are also not in favor
of the curb and gutter improvement and the streetlight. it
seems to us, these two improvements are out of character
with the surrounding neighborhood.
we have no rainwater drainage issues. Further, we are
unaware of any thing that has changed drainage in the
neighborhood. if the issue of drainage is arising because
there are issues with those who live at the end of the cul-
de -sac, these issues do not impact the rest of the circle
and should be addressed as so. The geography of our
neighborhood hasn't changed at all: This is not an issue.
Thank you for taking the
appreciate keeping.us up
wait to hear from you in
time to read our
to date on these
the near future.
very truly yours,
comments. we
issues and will
Donald and Terese Hasbargen
PRELIMINARY
ASSESSMENT ROLL
SCHAEFER CIRCLE IMPROVEMENT S -217
CITY OF EDINA
STREET
PID #
LEGAL
STREET
NO.
OWNER
LOT
BLOCK
TOTAL
LOTS
ASSESSMENT COST
A
Schaefer Cir
31- 117 -21- 14-0020
6
1
6216
Walsh, James, Helen, & Mary
1
$ 8,500.00
31- 117 -21 -14 -0070
7 & pt8
1
6212
Gaarder, Timothy
1
$ 8,500.00
31- 117 -21- 14-0023
pte
1
6208
Gaasedelen, James & Claudia
1
$ 8,500.00
31- 117 -21- 14-0024
9
1
6204
Hartig, Paul & Man
1
$ 8,500.00
31- 117 - 2131-0023
13
1
6201
Las Michael
1
$ 8500.00
31- 117 - 2131-0024
14
1
6209
Totall, Gary & Helen
1
$ 8,500.00
31 -117- 2131.0025
15
1
6213
Hasba en, Donald & Teresa
1
$ 8,500.00
31- 117 - 2131-0026
18
1
6217
!Jung us & Jody
1
$ 8,5w00
e $ 68,000.00
TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 68,000.00
AVERAGE COST PER LOT $ 8,500.00
A217 AssesenemaFewbity Page 1 1:47 PM31312005
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # II. C.
From: Wayne D. Houle,, PE Consent El
City Engineer-- Information Only ❑
Date: April 19, 2005 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
® To Council
Subject: Public Hearing °for West 58th Action ® Motion
Street — Roadway ® Resolution
Improvement No. BA -328
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Recommendation:
If the Council determines the project to be warranted and necessary, Council shall adopt a
resolution approving West 58th Street Roadway Improvements, City Improvement No. BA-'328,
authorize, plans and specifications to be completed and bids taken. This project will require a 4/5
favorable vote from the Council to move the project forward.
Info /Background:
Staff initiated this project. The proposed project will include reconstructing the roadway addin�
concrete curb and gutter, decorative street lighting, and a sidewalk on the northerly side of West 58
Street from Concord Avenue to Wooddale Avenue.
The estimated roadway construction cost is $357,000. This cost does not include costs for the City
utility repairs; staff is analyzing these repairs and will include them with final plans; funding for these
repairs will be funded through the respective utility funds. Funding for this project will be from a
special assessment of approximately 20% of the roadway cost, the remaining portion will be from
moneys received from the State Gas Tax as appropriated through the Municipal State Aid System.
The Feasibility Study is included with this report, along with all correspondence received to date.
Staff analyzed the project and feels that the project is feasible from an engineering standpoint.
G: \Engineering \Improvements \BA328 - West 58th St\CORRESPONDENCE\Misc\RRpublic hearing - BA328.doc
495/A \lam
o� e tr� FEASIBILITY STUDY — BA328
N� o ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
�• Y��ti� a CITY OF EDINA
STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
WEST 58TH STREET
APRIL 1, 2005
LOCATION: The West 58th Street project extends from Concord Avenue to Wooddale
Avenue (see Figure 1).
Dbll
.16
N
N n O O O O
N N
°7
°7 iD
':' 4601
a a
LO v
5615
5700
'18
v �
IT
5633
5619
5700
4620 4616 4608 4604 4600
5705
5623
cO
`�
0
u7 c-7
L(i LO In U )
v
It IT v
5640
4516 4512 5656
4524 dt
5901 5900 5901 5900 5901 5900 5901 5900
5905 5904 5905 5904 5905 5904 5905 5904
Figure 1. Protect Area Map
4629
7
^
°7
°7 iD
':' 4601
5701
4505
5700
v �
IT
It
'r v
5700
5705
cO
`�
0
5704
5705
5704
4630
N N
v v
t
v
0
v v 4600
5708
5709
5712
5708
CONCORDTER
5713
571c
5713
5712
00
5713
c� ^
o
0 4601
Project
v
5717
5'. Boundary 1717
5716
5717
Movi
WERE
5721
5724
5721
5720
O
O
N
a0
C'
CS
O
ap
N
5721
a
v
a
�
a
v
5725
5728
5725
5754
=
W 58TH
ST
9
a
5801
5800
mom!-5801-1-
5800 ■w 5801 5800 ■w 5801 5800
W 5
05
580-4—' a
5805
5804 a
5805
5804 a
5805
5804
c' 5
c
5808
0
5809
5808 j =
5809
5808 'LL
5809
5808
'J 5
z
809
5812
0 13
5812 °
5813
5812 ''< '
5813
-,
°c 5
817
5816
<
17
5816 cc
5817
5816
5817
5812 f
5
821
5820
821
5820
5821
5820
5821
5820
5
825
5824
5824
5825
5824
5825
5
29
5828
5825
5828
5829
5828
5829
5828
5
833
5832
5833
5832
5833
5832 !
5833
5832
5
837
5836
5837
5836
5837
5836
5837
5836
5
5840
5841
5840
5841
5840
5841
5840
5
841
5844
5845
5844
5845
5844
5845
5844
5
5901 5900 5901 5900 5901 5900 5901 5900
5905 5904 5905 5904 5905 5904 5905 5904
Figure 1. Protect Area Map
Feasibility Study
West 581h Street Imp. No. A -204
April 1, 2005
INITIATION & ISSUES: The West 58th Street project was initiated by the Engineering Department as
part of the Five -Year Capital Improvements Program, which is part of the
City's planning process to update the critical infrastructure within this
neighborhood as outlined in Figure 1.
The following are existing features that present issues in determining the
feasibility of the project and are addressed in this report:
• Surface rainwater drainage and storm sewer issues
• Sump pump discharging directly onto street
• Sanitary sewer and watermain deficiencies
• Poor condition of existing pavement
• Existing landscaping, driveways, etc.
• Existing overhead utility lines and poles
• Existing mature trees
• Existing lighting
EXISTING CONDITIONS: West 58th Street is part of the City's designated Municipal State Aid Roadway
System (MSA). The street and utilities in this neighborhood were originally
constructed in the 1950's with a storm sewer improvement in 1979. The
roadway width in this neighborhood is approximately 30 -ft with intermittent
curb and gutter and no sidewalks. The pavement condition varies throughout
the neighborhood but is in very poor condition overall (see Photo 1).
Photo 1. Existing Pavement Condition
Page 2 of 7
Feasibility Study
West 581h Street Imp. No. A -204
April 1, 2005
The speed limit on this roadway is 30 mph and currently no parking
restrictions are posted along West 58th Street.
Street grades within the neighborhood vary slightly but are relatively flat and
level. There is some existing storm sewer in the area, but overall the surface
drainage is very poor. Other typical items exist adjacent to the roadway such
as concrete driveways, landscaping, shrubs, trees and fences.
Most of the private utilities in this neighborhood are overhead (with the
exception of the gas lines). Street lighting consists of standard "cobra head"
lights mounted on wood poles that are typically located at the intersections.
PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS: This West 58th Street project involves the following improvements:
• Reconstructing the existing bituminous pavement.
• Constructing new concrete curb and gutter, driveway aprons,
and sidewalk.
• Retaining walls (lannon stone)
• Installing new decorative street lighting.
• Repairing /replacing the watermain where needed.
• Replacing fire hydrants.
• Repairing the sanitary sewer where needed.
• Updating and extending the storm sewer to accommodate the
new concrete curb and gutter.
• Installing drain the where needed to allow the property owners
to connect their sump pump discharges directly into the storm
sewer system.
A neighborhood informational meeting was held on November 22, 2005 to
gather data and answer questions the homeowners had relating to the
project. Over 14 residents attended this meeting.
Additionally, a neighborhood survey was sent to learn the favorability of
widening the street to obtain the necessary roadway width (to allow on- street
parking versus restricting parking) and installing decorative street lights with
this project. Input from the survey and comments received throughout the
planning of this project have been included in this report as an attachment.
The results of the survey are shown in Table 1.
Total Surveys
Surveys
Prefers Decorative Street
Lighting
Prefers Street
Widening (Parking
Allowed
Sent
Returned
Yes
No
Style
Yes
No
Colonial
Acorn
Traditional
19
12
7 •
4
2.00
1.57
1.50
1
10
of Returned Surveys
63%
58%
33%
8%
83%
Table 1. Survey Results
Page 3 of 7
Feasibility Study
West 58`h Street Imp. No. A -204
April 1, 2005
The following is a summary regarding the survey results including staff's
recommendations:
The majority of residents prefer installing decorative
street lighting — Staff recommends including
decorative street lighting with this project (see Figure
2).
Figure 2. Decorative Liqhtinq —
Traditional (latern) Style
The majority of residents do not prefer widening the street by 2 -ft to
accommodate on- street parking — Staff recommends constructing the
street to a 32 -ft width between Concord Avenue and St. Johns Avenue to
meet MSA standards, which accommodates one lane of parking. This will
allow on- street parking for those residents that directly front West 58 "'
Street.
The roadway will be constructed to MSA standards. The proposed roadway
widths range from 28 -ft with no parking and 32 -ft with parking allowed on one
side of the street (see Figure 4). Parking is proposed to be allowed only on
the north side of West 58th Street between Concord Avenue and St. Johns
Avenue. This area consists of the properties that front directly on West 58th
Street — All other properties front on the side streets where on- street parking
is available. Parking is proposed to be restricted in all other locations along
West 58th Street in the project area. The varying roadway widths
accommodate the neighborhood by minimizing impacts to the surrounding
topography. Trees will be protected and impacts to the trees will be
minimized.
Staff recommends installing a barrier style curb and gutter as it will work well
with the existing topography within this neighborhood (see Figure 3). A
barrier style curb provides the best control of water runoff and better defines
the roadway while providing protection to the sod and pavement edge from
snowplow damage in the winter months.
BG18 CUNC CURB & GUTTER
6' R1 /2'
R 3'
AT 3/8' R 3' 6'
SLOPE .3/4 PER Ft. • , .
7' I
BASE 7 112'
18' 8'
Figure 3. Typical Barrier /Bulkhead Curb and Gutter
Page 4 of 7
Feasibility Study
West 58`h Street Imp. No. A -204
April 1, 2005
5721 ,zU 4b]6 460& 460, 4600,_ r
W 58TH ST
O
Ul
'x
O
7!7��,-
r F-
r
.. U
U)
Q # 5808
:TWT
•tea_. _ �.
Ou 7`4
51 ?5 % ! t�
Z �
LLI
ATANNONOW
W
W 58TH ST Q
o
O
r •r �
RIGHT -OF -WAY
i
370
4.
C)
RIGHT -OF -WAY
Fiaure 4. Proposed Proiect Lavout
The pavement throughout this neighborhood appears to be at the end of its
useful life while the costs to maintain and repair the roadways are steadily
increasing. Overlaying or seal coating the pavement in this neighborhood is
not feasible.
Staff is continuing to analyze the utility repairs /replacements and will include
the needed improvements with the final plans. Other utility activities usually
include replacement of gas mains within the neighborhood, which is
determined and coordinated by the local gas utility company.
& EASEMENTS The right -of -way along West 58`h Street is typically 60 feet wide. All proposed
improvements stay within this right -of -way and no additional easement
requirements are anticipated.
Page 5 of 7
C)
Fiaure 4. Proposed Proiect Lavout
The pavement throughout this neighborhood appears to be at the end of its
useful life while the costs to maintain and repair the roadways are steadily
increasing. Overlaying or seal coating the pavement in this neighborhood is
not feasible.
Staff is continuing to analyze the utility repairs /replacements and will include
the needed improvements with the final plans. Other utility activities usually
include replacement of gas mains within the neighborhood, which is
determined and coordinated by the local gas utility company.
& EASEMENTS The right -of -way along West 58`h Street is typically 60 feet wide. All proposed
improvements stay within this right -of -way and no additional easement
requirements are anticipated.
Page 5 of 7
Feasibility Study
West 58th Street Imp. No. A -204
April 1, 2005
FEASIBILITY: This project is feasible from an engineering and City standpoint.
PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $357,000 (this amount includes
$40,000 for decorative lighting). The total cost includes indirect costs of
15% for engineering and clerical costs and 7.5% for first year finance costs.
The estimated construction cost does not include utility improvements.
Sanitary sewer, storm sewer and watermain work is anticipated in this
neighborhood; however, the final utility improvements will be determined
during the final design and will be funded through the respective utility fund.
Funding for the entire project will be from a combination of special
assessment and utility funds.
ASSESSMENTS: , A special assessment of approximately $68 per assessable front foot is
proposed for this project and will be levied against the residents adjacent
to West 58th Street. This assessment will cover 20% of the roadway
reconstruction costs. The funding the City receives through the State Gas
Tax for maintenance and construction of roadways will fund the remaining
portion of this cost. The justification for assessments is attributed to
properties receiving benefit of the new pavement, concrete curb and gutter,
and the addition of decorative street lighting.
The assessable front foot is based on Hennepin County 1/8 Section maps
and includes property that abuts the West 58th Street right -of -way. Properties
that abut this right -of -way with their backyard or sideyard will be assessed at
1/3 of the assessable front footage rate. A 10 -year payback period for these
special assessments is proposed for this project. A tabulated preliminary
assessment roll is attached to this study and a summary of this assessment
roll is shown in Figure 5.
PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule is feasible from an Engineering standpoint:
ATTACHMENTS:
Council Orders Public Hearing .......... ..........................March 15, 2005
Receive Feasibility Report ............... ............................... April 5, 2005
Public Hearing .. ............................... ..........................April 19, 2005
Bid Opening .................................... ............................... May 2005
Award Contract ..... ............................... ...........................June 2005
Begin Construction ............................... ...........................June 2005
Complete Construction ....................... .........................Summer 2006
• Information Meeting Attendance List and Comments
• Survey Results and Comments
• Preliminary Assessment Roll
Page 6 of 7
Feasibility Study
West 58th Street Imp. No. A -204
April 1, 2005
5611 rn �~ (CO) 0 o N N N '� `' 4501
316 N
v v v
5615 v v v LO 56
518 5640
5633
5619 4620 4616 4608 4604 4600 ,Nn 4516 4512 5656
05623 4524
629 Cn r� " Cc:)) v d v v v 46015700 5701 4505 5700
705 v 0 0 N CC) 5704 5705 5704
cv N .- 0 0 5708
630 v v v 4600 5712 5709 5708
CONCORDTER
713 N a 0
4601 5713 5716 5713 5712 °N
V
v v (0 v v
5717 5720 5717 5716 IT
717 N cD N v Q 5721 5724 5721 5720
00
5721 5721 v v v O O 25 5728 5725 5754
W 58TH ST
w 5801 5800 W 5801 5800 w 5801 5800 w 5801 5800 W 580
a 5805 5804 < "5805 5804 'a 5805 5804 'a 5805 5804 a 580
° 5808 5809 5808 z 5809 5808 a 5809 5808 a 580
O x LL
5809 5812 v 5813 5812 ° 5813 5812 a 5813 $ 581
5817 5818 s 5817 5816 N 5817 5816 5817 5812 3 581
5821 582 5821 5820 5821 5820 5821 5820 582
25 582 5825 5824 5825 5824 5825 582
829 582 5828 5829 5828 5829 5828 582
833 5832 5833 5832 5833 5832 5833 5832 583
5837 5836 5837 5836 5837 5836 5837 5836 583
5841 5840 5841 5840 5841 5840 5841 5840 584
5844 5845 5844 5845 5844 5845 5844 584
5901 5900 5901 5900 5901 5900 5901 5900 590
5905
5904
5905 5904
5905 5904
590 ^ =H••m• ^v 590
5909
5908
5909 5908
5908
590 590
r
5913
5912
5913
5913 5912
591 UU 14 591
Figure 5. Preliminary Assessment Map
Page 7 of 7
ToCM� i o✓� ge2�-✓ly C�f�c►��ance)
$ s+ Ct rvr►ti Cw► CorcJ io In 1crt� d d at (�
�et m e Acld re s 5
_�42p F. -.W ,(,(. �.aw►t. 5-�ag r-aI le, FAY fx-i c-, s�
r 1/
ir
oira. .�o5h O&m
f _.
_IOC 6 �G�--
�.l-�.
S?as�rRk,.�e Ave
5801 AshcroC+ Ave.
q (, o o
s-Y
q&a4
w s�'
Q TION / COMMENT CARD
GCS L req,
Name 6co
PLEASE PRrNT
Address G' 7zS hv
PLEASE PRINT
QUESTION / COMMENT CARD
1h e &, 1 k *to krona *WL W 1 Ix an rte, MCA
C,m^(ex(\eA alokAk, 5P4110 of iycLt c
Name d Address 51 15 Fo-1 u�
PLEASE PRI r PLEASE PRINT
� ON qaa - iota
Steve Lillehaug
From: Wayne Houle
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 4:21 PM
To: Steve Lillehaug
Subject: FW: 58th Street Improvement Project
fyi
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Moira [ mailto :morninglory08ll29 @excite.comI
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 4:10 PM
To: Wayne Houle
Cc: joshua .olson@provationmedical.com
Subject: 58th Street Improvement Project
Hi Wayne,
Josh & I wish to express our desire NOT to have a "parking bay" located directly across
the street from our 5801 Ashcroft Ave. home. We feel that this will invite non - neighbors
to park across from us, and thus affect our sense of security. We will be more than happy
to try to assist our neighbors in sharing our driveway if they ask us for help at special
events, etc., when they may have driveway overflow.
We also feel that a parking bay would look extremely odd ... as few, if any, surrounding
streets have such a feature. We do not wish our home's curbside appeal to be negatively
impacted.
Please add this concern to your list of comments on this project.
Thank you.
Moira & Josh Olson
Join Excite! - http: / /www.excite.com
1
'Steve Lillehaug
From:
Wayne Houle
Sent:
Wednesday, November 24, 2004 8:31 AM
To:
emominglory08l l29@excite.com'
Cc:
Steve Lillehaug
Subject:
RE: 58th Street Improvement Project
Josh & Moira:
Thank you for your comments. Your comments and issues will be addressed and included in
the referenced project's feasibility study and presented to the Council for consideration.
Thanks
Wayne Houle, PE
Director of Public Works / City Engineer
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
whoule @ci.edina.mn.us
952 -826 -0443 direct
952 - 826 -0390 fax
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Moira [ mailto :morninglory08ll29 @excite.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 3:27 PM
To: Wayne Houle
Cc: joshua .olson@provationmedical.com
Subject: 58th Street Improvement Project
Hello Wayne,
Thanks again for the informative meeting last evening. Josh & I own 5801 Ashcroft.Ave.,
and we wanted to point out a serious concern to us, as sidewalk feasability /location is
one of the improvements on the table.
We have a one -car cement driveway. Last month, we had an asphalt pull -out spot added
alongside the east side of the driveway, bumping our total available parking spaces to 3
outside the garage. We spent $1000 in order to make this improvement from 2 to 3 spaces.
If a sidewalk is added, we'll be back down to 2 spaces (unless we change our cars to Geo
Metros) and won't have a long enough available space to add more. It would look
ridiculous to add another spot alongside the 2 existing spaces. As we have 1 14 -year old
and a preteen in the family, parking for us will really be at a premium soon.
We very much will appreciate you taking our situation into consideration as various
sidewalk pros and cons are discussed. Please feel free to contact Moira at 952- 285 -2969
(home) or 952 - 992 -5341 (work) to discuss the matter further.
Sincerely,
1
r
Moira and Joshua Olson
Join Excitet - http: / /www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
Page 1 of 1
Steve Lillehaug
From: Bob.Stoltz [Bob.Stoltz@target.com] -
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 2:17 PM
To: Steve Lillehaug
Cc: bobnewkirk@mn.rr.com
Subject: Comments for 58th St. Improvements
Hi Steve -
Thank you for the thorough presentation of the proposed road improvements for 58th St. - it was
very informative in helping us understand the scope and possible options to consider. I live at 4608
58th St. (one of the "blue" houses) - My comments somewhat reflect the fact that I am one of
seven houses that have addresses on 58th Street.
My comments /concerns are:
• Maintain the mature trees on the north side of 58th (between Concord and St. Johns - I don't
recall mature trees on the north side between St. Johns and Wooddale).
• Maintain "residential" feel of street - Ideally, reduce the width of the new road relative to the
existing road. I would not want the street to resemble Wooddale in terms of width. Wide feels
like fast.
• Add a sidewalk with a minimal boulevard - The idea being to have "green" between the road
and sidewalk so that the sidewalk does not feel like an extension of the road.
• No parking on either side of the road. I don't mean to represent my neighbors on this issue,
but very seldom does anyone park on the road currently. I think this was reflected in some of
the comments last night. My preference is to not make it more inviting to park along 58th
(which is what I believe parking "bays" would do).
I've attached a sketch that reflects the concerns mentioned above - If the road was reduced to 28
feet in width (from it's current 30 feet) and by shifting the the south edge of the road 2 feet to the
south, it would allow the north side to have a boulevard, sidewalk and 3' of existing "green" to the
base of the existing trees.
An option to consider - The section of road from St. Johns to Wooddale could have a wider
boulevard w /trees since there are not existing mature trees on the north side (nor do the houses
"front" 58th Street). The road would align the full length, but the sidewalk would "shift" at St.
Johns. Not sure if that's allowable or not.
Thanks again for your time - let me know if you have any questions or comments!
Bob (and Vivian) Stoltz
4608 58th Street West
(952) 929 - 3613
11/23/2004
®,
-s
S _
m.♦
G�� J
�p
a.
s
0
� m
��itiTin(� RDan
xi ti �Pro v
� 0
T Ff Vi
�NO ftgK►n& ,1 ,fit' COW)
4or man
�K1✓J) � / V ✓ �s, , r
6\11 6-r a AL40
1
$6ovHR1D
C
6
N
Steve Lillehaug
From: Steve Lillehaug
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 11:07 AM
To: 'Ryan Langsev'; Wayne Houle
Cc: Steve Lillehaug
Subject: RE: 58th Street West street project
Thank you for your comments. Your comments and issues will be addressed and included in
the referenced project's feasibility study and presented to the Council for consideration.
Thank you.
Steven L. Lillehaug, P.E., P.T.O.E.
Edina Traffic Engineer /Assistant Engineer
Engineering Department
952 - 826 -0445
slillehaug ®ci.edina.mn.us
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
www.cityofedina.com
(fax) 952- 826 -0389
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Ryan Langsev [ mailto :rlangsev @mulliganbjornnes.com)
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 10:56 AM
To: Wayne Houle
Cc: Steve Lillehaug
Subject: 58th Street West street project
Mr. Houle:
Thank you for the informational meeting last evening. I and my family
reside at 5801 Concord Avenue. Although we have many concerns regarding
the street project as a homeowner, none is more greater than whether the
project will address a huge and vexing problem that continues to concern
property owners in the western part of this project: stormwater runoff.
Current stormwater pipes / utilities in this area do NOT properly
handle this significant water concern. Every time the City receives a
one -half inch or more of rainfall in a 24 hour period, ponding occurs in
the area adjacent to and along Concord Avenue and south of South View
middle school where the new high school baseball field is being built.
Ponding occurs every time. I am not aware of what steps were taken to
address this concern in the recent construction on the south side of the
southeast parking lot for the middle school campus. Nonetheless, I do
not see how the problem was resolved; if anything, it appears the
addition of two more drain outlets to this spot has significantly
compounded this problem.
Ponding becomes a temporary "lake" for a period of time corresponding
to the amount of rainfall: for one -half inch, about one day; greater
than one -half to an inch, one day of water, and another day when the
field is too soaked for human access; more than one inch, days of
standing water, followed by a day or two when the field cannot handle
human traffic. It will be interesting to watch how the Edina High
School baseball team attempts to maintain its schedule and host games on
1
this field during a wet spring. As a parent, I would be concerned
whether my child is put in jeopardy playing on a soggy field in an
attempt to get all the games played due to postponement from rain. The
Edina high school baseball team may begin playing its games and
practices on a field which has a reputation in the Twin Cities western
suburbs as being a mud field.
During the major storm of June 2003 when our area lost power for over
three days, the water runoff from the storm went over the sidewalk from
the school campus into Concord Avenue and over the eastside gutters onto
our property and other properties along the east side of Concord Avenue.
Clearly, the stormwater drains do NOT properly handle significant water
amounts or prevent such water from causing major structural damage to
many houses in the Concord Avenue / 58th Street West area.
If this street project is to address all issues for a fifty year
period, it MUST fully provide significant storm drainage capacity much
greater than its current ability to accomodate water runoff. Water
runoff appears to be increasing in volume to the area based upon past
history, recent construction, and reporting that our general weather
patterns are becoming warmer with more severe weather systems (i.e.
greater number of tornados and other systems characterized by torrential
rains).
I understand the area water problem may be compounded fundamentally by
being located at the end of the water drain system whereby its immediate
runoff is partly back -up from and /or a result of all immediate eastern
properties runoff which must drain away before the water in this area
can finally drain away. It is for these reasons and others that I was
puzzled how the City determined it could place its preminent baseball
field in this location.
My concerns are not meant to address the incredible water problems
caused by the 1987 storm. You are well aware as to how high the water
levels reached in our area.
Nonetheless, I submit that the City will exercise poor business
judgment and implement bad decisions of its discretionary capacity in
its governmental role if it does not properly address the water runoff
in this area in implementation of this street project. The City is
certainly on notice that water runoff in this area is a significant
problem. The City Council certainly should not only be fully advised of
this problem, but also advised that the project WILL address the issue,
and demonstrate to the Council the project's ability to properly correct
the significant problem and accommodate the water runoff.
I trust you, Steven L. Lillehaug, and your department will address this
significant problem in the context of the proposed 58th Street project.
Ryan E. Langev
5801 Concord Avenue
Edina, MN 55424
(952) 925 -9141
Ryan E. Langsev
Mulligan & Bjornnes PLLP
401 Groveland Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55403
(612) 879 -1819
2
Steve Lillehaug
From: Gary Williams [gary@SayltsSold.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 9:39 AM
To: Steve Lillehaug
Subject: FW: November 22, Informational Meeting Edina City Hall
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Gary Williams (mailto:gary ®SayItsSold.com]
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 10:26 PM
To: 'slillehaug@edina.mn.us'
Subject: November 22, Informational Meeting Edina City Hall
Hi Steve
Thank you first of all for the very informative meeting tonight. My name is
Gerard E. Williams, and I live at 5728 Fairfax Ave. So Edina. I would very
much like you to accept my vote to do the reconstruction of 58th street. I
would like to see the road decreased to 28 feet wide. I am not in favor of
having parking spaces adjacent to my home, as it would not give me much side
yard. I would like to see it adjacent to the homes further west as you have
it planned, I think it would not only look good but also slow down the
speed. I would vote for side walks , even though I believe they would be on
my side of the street. Unlike some of the other's I would like to see the
extra monies spent to add the nice street lighting, as I think it would add
value to the neighborhood. If you have any further comments needed from me I
would be happy to share them. I make my living selling Real Estate, and I do
know what will help increase the value of homes. If my home faced 58th like
the one's west of me I would not hesitate to have parking in front of my
home, as it will help future sales value for resale. I would be glad to
speak to that fact if you need it.
Thank You
Gerard E. Williams
WEST 58TH ST I IMPROVEMENT
IMPROVEM NO. BA-328
SURVEY RESULTS
Returned
Decorative Street Lights
Widening Street
Survey
Yes
No
Style
Yes No
NO
STREET
COMMENTS
Colonial
Acorn
Traditional
Please se my email of 12/17 for additional comments; if decorative
street lights are installed, I think lightpoles should be black, not green.
4600158TH
ST W
X
X
2
3
1
X
Thanks.
Leave street as is. Add "no parking" signs on one side. Do not destroy
8 blvd treets on no.side. No sidewalk - widen street 2 ft. - parking one
4604
58TH ST W
X
1
X
side.
No to parking. Must retain mature trees. Please go forward with
proposed 28 ft. road. 32 ft. section gives impression that road is wider
(ala Wooddale) - narrow road with no parking should be only
4608158TH
ST W
X
X
2
1
3
X
consideration. Thank you.
4612
58TH ST W
4616
58TH ST W
4620
58TH ST W
Such proposed parking is not seen anywhere else in Edina. Its
presence would only serve to cheapen the value of our n'hood and
promote strangers to park their vehicles on our street. It also eats into
the yards and driveways of residents. Having a sidewalk, especially a
buffered one is damaging enough as it is. Why is that not a question on
the survey? IYs known issue (you mention it yourself in this mailing)
The choise of whether or not to have a buffer has already been taken
out of our hands. I don't appreciate the felling that the entire issue of a
sidewalk has been as well. It seems as though you might be more
concerned with the city than the citizens, on that issue. I look forward to
5801
JASHCROFT AVE
X
X
1
X
hearing more about the status of a sidewalk.
5800
ASHCROFT AVE
I am not in favor of a new sidewalk on the northside of the street. My
5721
CONCORD AVE
X
X
1
X
concern is the trees that could be endangered with a sidewalk.
Parking along 58th st. has always been a problem involving traffic flow
issues, especially during high volume use activities such as football
games. However, I recognize that great deference should be afforded
the homeowners on the no.side of 58th between Concord and St.
5801
CONCORD AVE
X
X
1
X
johns. Aves.
I would like to see the road from Wooddale to St. Johns reduced by 2'
to then be 28' wide. You can then widen from St. Johns to concord to
allow for parking. I just don't want from Wooddale to St. Johns
5728
FAIRFAX AVE
X
X
2
3
1
X
widened.
5800
FAIRFAX AVE
WEST 58TH STREET IMPROVEMENT
IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-328
SURVEY RESULTS
NO
STREET
Returned
Survey
Decorative
Street Li hts
Widening Street
COMMENTS
Yes
No
Style
Yes No
I
Colonial jAcorn
Colonial
Traditional
I Traditional
5725
FAIRFAX AVE
X
X
7
1
2.00
2
1.50
X
10
58011
FAIRFAX AVE
X
33%
X
1
1 8%
83%
X
No sidewalks.
5725
5801
ST JOHNS AVE
ST JOHNS AVE
X
X
3
1
2
*Abstain - I am not impacted by the decsion directly. I am for whatever
has the least impact to existing trees considering also the proposed
sidewalk.
5800
ST JOHNS AVE
X
X
1
X
Want narrow street.
5754
WOODDALE AVE
5800
WOODDALE AVE
X
X
1
X
I am a senior citizen and wonder why or if widening the street is for
parking for the new gyms and not residents. I have never noticed the
street lights north of 50th on Wooddale, but now that I have, they are
dim and look dirty.
Totals
19
12
7
4
10
"1
12
1
10
2.001
1.57
1.501
1
Total Surveys
Surveys
Decorative Street Lighting
Preference
Street Widening
Preference
(Parkinj Allowed
Sent
Returned
Yes
No
Style
Yes
No
Colonial
Acorn
I Traditional
19
12
7
4
2.00
1.571
1.50
1 1
10
of Returned Surveys
1 63%
58%
33%
1
1 8%
83%
Page I of 2
Steve Lillehaug
From: Bob Newkirk [bobnewkirk@mn.rr.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2004 1:16 AM
To: Steve Lillehaug
Cc: Bob.Stoltz
Subject: More Comments for 58th St. Improvements
Steve,
Just wanted to let you know that Kristine and I (at 4600 W. 58th St.) support the views outlined in Bob Stoltz's
note below, as well as the specific plan he attached. I think the major concerns of the residents are:
Keep Speeds Down. In this case, that means a narrower road. Parking availability doesn't slow traffic down,
because so little parking takes place on this road.
Maintain Aesthetics. This means keeping the mature trees, and adding a "boulevard" sidewalk, i.e., one that isn't
flush up against the street. I would also observe that there is a power line that crosses the street between just
west of Woodale that could be buried.
Improve Drainage. This all takes place underground, I assume, but the area in general gets a lot of runoff during
storms and this issue must be kept front of mind.
I do think a sidewalk is in order for the children in the area. We would also be open to nicer street lamps, pending
the additional assessment analysis.
With respect to parking, I would note that this would only appear to be a practical issue for the residents that have
driveways on 58th street. The number of nearby side streets and the double -width driveways on this street
mitigate the relatively minor need for parking. I also don't see how there is room to save the mature trees, have a
boulevard sidewalk and have parking. One of the three has to go. It's easy for me to say, as our driveway opens
on St. John's, but I would choose to eliminate the parking.
Thanks again for a good presentation last month. I'm sure the ultimate end product will turn out well.
Bob Newkirk
4600 W. 58th St.
952.924.6023
-- Original Message - --
From: Bob.Stoltz
To: slillehaugaci.edina.mn.us
Cc: bobnewkirk(a)mn.rr.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 12:16 PM
Subject: Comments for 58th St. Improvements
Hi Steve -
Thank you for the thorough presentation of the proposed road improvements for 58th St. - it was
very informative in helping us understand the scope and possible options to consider. I live at
4608 58th St. (one of the "blue" houses) - My comments somewhat reflect the fact that I am one
of seven houses that have addresses on 58th Street.
My comments /concerns are:
12/22/2004
Page 2 of 2
• Maintain the mature trees on the north side of 58th (between Concord and St. Johns - I
don't recall mature trees on the north side between St. Johns and Wooddale).
• Maintain "residential" feel of street - Ideally, reduce the width of the new road relative to
the existing road. I would not want the street to resemble Wooddale in terms of width.
Wide feels like fast.
• Add a sidewalk with a minimal boulevard - The idea being to have "green" between the road
and sidewalk so that the sidewalk does not feel like an extension of the road.
• No parking on either side of the road. I don't mean to represent my neighbors on this issue,
but very seldom does anyone park on the road currently. I think this was reflected in some
of the comments last night. My preference is to not make it more inviting to park along
58th (which is what I believe parking "bays" would do).
I've attached a sketch that reflects the concerns mentioned above - If the road was reduced to 28
feet in width (from it's current 30 feet) and by shifting the the south edge of the road 2 feet to
the south, it would allow the north side to have a boulevard, sidewalk and 3' of existing "green"
to the base of the existing trees.
An option to consider - The section of road from St. Johns to Wooddale could have a wider
boulevard w /trees since there are not existing mature trees on the north side (nor do the houses
"front" 58th Street). The road would align the full length, but the sidewalk would "shift" at St.
Johns. Not sure if that's allowable or not.
Thanks again for your time - let me know if you have any questions or comments!
Bob (and Vivian) Stoltz
4608 58th Street West
(952) 929 - 3613
12/22/2004
PRELIMINARY
ASSESSMENT ROLL
W 58th St IMPROVEMENT BA-328
CITY OF EDINA
STREET
FIG
LEGAL
STREET
NO.
OWNER
Frontage
LOT
BLOCK
Front Fmtg
Slde Fmtg
Back Frntg
Total
Assessable
Frontage
ASSESSMENT COST
A
Ashcroft Ave
19ffi 6-2631 -0068
24
7
6601
8660fe, 16148
1366200
46.2067
S 3,089.04
19-02&24-31 -0089
1
6
6600
Soot. Dorothy
136.6200
46.2067
S 3,069.94
Concord Ave
18-028-24.24 422
13
1
6721
Band. Jaoqudim
1167100
38.6700
s 2,619.25
1992 8-2431 -0090
248 pt23
6
6601
Ungm, Rym A Ladle
1361200
46.2697
S 3,089.94
Fairfax Ave
mma -24-24 40028
4
2
5728
Williams, Dowd
1312700
43.7567
S 2.971.47
1942&2424 -0037
6
3
5725
Ford Gerald 8 Addants, Cwyn
129.6000
43.2000
2.W3.67
19928-24,31 -0021
24
5
6801
Trwntl Josnh
134.1200
44.7087
303699
1902 &24 - 31-0022
1
8
Saw
Werxn Stepharft
1366200
462067
S 3089.94
Saint Johns Ave
10-02 &24.24 -0029
6
21
5725
HaiM Gregory 8 Molina
1312700
431667
S 2,971.47
19-02 &24.31 -0046
0
0
61101
Wilson Kristopher 8 M Amanda
136,6260
462087
$ 3, 069.95
11IO2 &24,31 -0048
1
7
6600
Bar Alan A Mkhd.
1361200
46,2697
S 3.059.94
W 58th St
10-02 8-26 24-0021
12
1
4620
Herd
60.6000
60.6000
s 5.432.72
19-02 8-24-24 -0020
11
1
4816
E aPetdGa
110.0000
60.0000
6432.72
19.02 8-2624-0019
10
1
4812
Cholor, Jmvwv a Ompotang, Yeah
60.0000
8D ww
I k432.72
%o2 &2624-0016
9
1
4808
Stoltz, Robert a Wan
60.0000
60.0000
$ 6.432.72
1992 8-24-24 -0017
S
1
4804
E RkJtad a Jeamlre
60.0000
00.0000
432.72
IGMS -24. 24-0016
7
1
4600
Robert a 101allm
76.2700
762700
6316.24
Wooddale Ave
19-02 &2624-0079
4
3
6764
Wind. Je ome
128.6000
43.2000
S 2,933.67
1992 &2631 -0001
1
I
Robert a Ell7aberh
134.1200
44.7057
S 3,035.09
1,051.4087
S 71,400.00
to"
mad -y PROJECT COST S 317,000.00
demratNS lighting coal S 40.000.00
total roedwvy4lpMinpmal S 357,000.00
Total Aee09aeble Coat (20% mseaaed / 80% SA) S 71,400.00
TOTAL ASSESSABLE FTG: 1,061.407
ASSESSABLE COST PER FOOT: s 87.91
wmst�j-biup Papal 2:as PMY31r2M
Agenda Item # II.C.
TO: Engineering Department
FROM: Residents of 58th Street
DATE: April 19, 2005
RE: Resident Petition Proposed Roadway Improvement No.
BA -328 West 58"' Street Improvements
Attached is a copy of a petition that will be 9resented to the Edina
City Council at tonight's meeting. West 58 Street residents within
the proposed improvement zone are unanimously oovoosed to on-
street parking but supgort preservation of the mature trees along the
roadway.
If you have any questions, please contact Bob or Kristine Newkirk at
952.924.6023.
Thank you.
TO: Edina City Council
DATE: April 19, 2005
RE: Neighborhood roadway Improvements - Proposed
Improvement No. BA-328 West 5e Street Improvements
We, the undersigned residents of 58th Street, have two primary goals
in mind for the proposed roadway improvements on West 58th Street.
1. Maintain a safe thoroughfare for local residents and children
walking to and from area schools
2. Preserve property values
In order to meet these goals, we respectfully support the following
road improvements:
• No on- street parking. Cars move faster on wider streets.
The City's goal for the area should be to calm traffic flow, which
can be accomplished with a 28 foot wide thoroughfare.
• Preserve mature trees along 58"' Street.
Thank you for the opportunity to participate in this hearing.
Name Address
ii
s
!� / /
. W, ..W R i'
fir
1 �
� C �/
s
n .S7Z J-
�-�/� 5 %1' ! o D,'•u f-t� �s mac.., -7-57t • f n IA ki
( t , 4<v6'j Au 56
y
4� l6 .2,0 r,- 5 k�, �
-a-
Page 2
-7-P- j `.
A VAV MI
3"10(
fr. _'
/i-1-
Aowe ��
�s�2, co
' y
.f
v-
1888
AGENDA NO. III.A.
PUBLIC HEARING -
VACATION OF PUBLIC STREET
PUKWANA LANE
CONTINUED TO MAY 39 2005
No packet data
1-1 Oral presentation
Information coming
w`
° e o REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Craig Larsen
Date: April 19, 2005
Subject: Zoning Ordinance
Amendment and Conditional
Use Permit — Southwest
Quadrant of 50th and France
— Haugland Companies
Agenda Item # IV. A.
Consent ❑ .
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
❑To Council
Action ® Motion
❑Resolution
®'Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Recommendation:
Grant Second Reading to Ordinance Amendment allowing residential dwelling units as a
Conditional use in the PCD -1, 2 and 3 districts, and approve Conditional Use Permit subject
to: a
1. Platting the property to incorporate all easement vacations and dedications.
2. Developer's Agreement covering utility work and restoration of streets and walks..
Info /Background:
See attached' Planning Commission minutes, staff report, plans and correspondence.
0
I
r'
•r. �I 'h' aJ �.
Utu
iom o3mu7 mum mtraat wam
1.5020 Franca Avenue Se
IV
DRAFT MINUTES PC MEETING
MARCH 30, 2005
C-05 -1 Conditional Use Permit
Haugland Companies
Southwest quadrant of France Avenue and 50th St. W.
Mr. Larsen told the Commission on March 15, 2005, the City Council
approved and granted first reading of,a Zoning Ordinance amendment allowing
residential use in the Planned Commercial. District subject to a Conditional Use
Permit. The proponents have now filed plans in support of their request for a
Conditional Use Permit pursuant to the amended Ordinance.
Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use
Permit conditioned on:
1. Final adoption of ordinance amendment
2. Watershed District Permits .
3. Developer's Agreement covering utility easements and vacations as
required; air and subterranean rights easements; and temporary
construction easements.
4. Landscaping bond covering replacement of plant materials and
restoration of public walks, drives and fixtures.
The proponent, Mr. Gene Haugland was present to respond to questions.
Mr. Haugland addressed the Commission and with graphics pointed out
the changes that occurred since the Commission last heard this issue with regard
to the fagade of the proposed redevelopment. Mr. Haugland said exterior
materials and the building elevation has been refined and this change in
elevation allows owners to take advantage of the views. Mr. Haugland noted
fine - tuning still needs to be accomplished with regard to utilities.
Commissioner Brown stated if he remembers correctly from our previous
meeting that sidewalks will be widened. Mr. Haugland responded that is correct.
He said the sidewalk along France Avenue will be widened by 3 feet with the
sidewalk along West 50th remaining the same. He noted the sidewalk between
the Arbys site and Ampersand building will also be widened.
Commissioner Losnbury asked Mr. Haugland if there will be a visitor
entrance at the rear.. Mr. Haugland responded our initial thought is to have visitor
,t
access only off France Avenue. Mr. Haugland acknowledged it may be possible
that in the future the condo association may desire a rear visitor entrance but at
this time the building will be designed without that. The entrance and exit for
visitors will be from France Avenue.
Commissioner Lonsbury asked Mr. Haugland if the issues with Mr. Curtin
have been resolved. Mr. Haugland responded he believes they have been
resolved. He added discussions are continuing with regard to erecting a canopy
over the adjoining walkway.
Chair Workinger asked Mr. Haugland if any changes were made with
regard to guest parking. Mr. Haugland responded the parking element remains
the same with no guest parking in the below grade garage. Only residents of the
building will park their vehicles in that area. Guest parking would be
accommodated in the public ramps or on the public street.
Chair Workinger stated he was unable to attend the last Commission
meeting when this issue was heard and noted there was some discussion
regarding air /subterranean rights and questioned if they have been addressed.
Mr. Haugland responded utilities etc. will be addressed in the Developer's
Agreement and at that time finalized.
Chair Workinger questioned if the trash enclosure would remain in the
same location. Mr. Haugland said the trash enclosure area will remain in the
same location, as it exists today. He explained the majority of the retail tenants
use this trash area. He added he believes Lunds has its own trash enclosure
area, and also due to utility placement the conclusion was to retain the trash
area, as it presently exists.
Chair Workinger asked if the trash area is secured. Mr. Haugland said
presently the trash area is secured with a code pad for access.
Mr. Hosmar Brown, property owner in the area, told the Commission he
still has difficulty with this proposal. He said he agrees with much of what he
sees, but questioned if this is the right location for a development of this size. He
added his concern is with traffic and traffic congestion. He stated he believes
traffic in the area will only increase in the future and this will contribute to that
increase. Mr. Brown told the Commission that presently merchants in the area
already complain that their clients have a hard time finding adequate parking.
Concluding, Mr. Brown said he hopes this proposal doesn't end up creating a
canyon feel to that comer.
Mr. Grabiel moved to recommend Conditional Use Permit approval subject
to staff conditions. Commissioner Fischer seconded the motion. All voted aye;
motion carried.
INN
Sri I -Y L!I'.
•y i 1 � �
nnuslana %oompi
101 -3907 50th Stnw
00020 Franca Avenues Sep
,y
IL
REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA PLANNING COMMISISON
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 30,2005,7:00 PM
EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
4801 WEST 50TH STREET
Case Number:
C -05 -1
Location:
Southwest quadrant of France Avenue and 50th Street
Applicant:
Haugland Companies
Request:
Conditional Use Permit to allow residential dwelling units above retail in the
PCD -2 zoning district.
Request:
The City Council, on March 15, 2005, granted first reading of a Zoning Ordinance
amendment allowing residential use in Planned Commercial Districts subject to a
Conditional Use Permit. (Ordinance is attached). The proponents have now filed
plans in support of their request for a Conditional Use Permit pursuant to the
amended Ordinance. Plans submitted include site plan, utility plan, floor plans,
landscaping plan, and building elevations. The plans submitted satisfy
Ordinance requirements.
Zoning Compliance:
The plans presented comply with the requirements of the PCD -2 district, and the
residential plans comply with Conditional Use requirements. The plans are
essentially the same as those reviewed by the Commission in February. Since
that time the developer has continued to work on utilities and to refinements of
the exterior of the building. The plans suggest using varying brick colors with
copper and pre - finished metal accents. The developer will have a color
rendering at the Commission meeting.
"f 1
Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit conditioned on:
1. Final adoption of ordinance amendment
2. Watershed District permits.
3. Developer's Agreement covering utility easements and vacations,
as required; air and subterranean rights easements; and temporary
construction easements.
4. Landscaping bond covering replacement of plant materials and
restoration of public walks, drives and fixtures.
M
REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA PLANNING COMMISISON
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 30,2005,7:00 PM
EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
4801 WEST 50TH STREET
Case Number:
C -05 -1
Location:
Southwest quadrant of France Avenue and 50th Street
Applicant:
Haugland Companies
Request:
Conditional Use Permit to allow residential dwelling units above retail in the
PCD -2 zoning district.
Request:
The City Council, on March 15, 2005, granted first reading of a Zoning Ordinance
amendment allowing residential use in Planned Commercial Districts subject to a
Conditional Use Permit. (Ordinance is attached). The proponents have now filed
plans in support of their request for a Conditional Use Permit pursuant to the
amended Ordinance. Plans submitted include site plan, utility plan, floor plans,
landscaping plan, and building elevations. The plans submitted satisfy
Ordinance requirements.
Zoning Compliance:
The plans presented comply with the requirements of the PCD -2 district, and the
residential plans comply with Conditional Use requirements. The plans are
essentially the same as those reviewed by the Commission in February. Since
that time the developer has continued to work on utilities and to refinements of
the exterior of the building. The plans suggest using varying brick colors with
copper and pre - finished metal accents. The developer will have a color
rendering at the Commission meeting.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit conditioned on:
1. Final adoption of ordinance amendment
2. Watershed District permits.
3. Developer's Agreement covering utility easements and vacations,
as required; air and subterranean rights easements; and temporary
construction easements.
4. Landscaping bond covering replacement of plant materials and
restoration of public walks, drives and fixtures.
ORDINANCE NO. 2005 -3
AN ORDINANCE ADDING RESIDENTIAL DWELLING
UNITS AS A CONDITIONAL USE IN THE PCD -1,2 AND 3
ZONING DISTRICTS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Subsection 850.16 of Section 850 of the Edina City
Code is amended by adding the following thereto:
"Conditional Uses in PCD -1,2 and 3."
Residential dwelling units above principal uses.
Section 2. Subd. 11, of Subsection 850.16 is further amended by
adding thereto:
O. Standards for residential dwelling units.
1. No part of any dwelling unit shall be located at street
grade.
2. The floor area of the building used for residential
purposes shall be exempt from the Floor Area
requirements of the underlying district.
3. Dwelling units with a floor area of 1,500 square feet or
less shall provide a minimum of 1.25 fully enclosed
parking spaces per unit. Dwelling units exceeding 1,500
square feet shall provide a minimum of 1.5 fully enclosed
spaces per unit.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full
force and effect after its adoption and publication according to the law.
April 11, 2005
City Council
City of Edina
4801 West 50`x' St.
Edina, MN 55424
RICHARD T. CURTIN
6310 MCINTYRE POINTE
EDINA. MN 55439
952- 828 -0900
Re: Proposed Haugland development
April 19, 2005, public hearing
Dear Members of the City Council:
I am the owner of the Ampersand Building, 5074 France Avenue South, located
immediately south of the Haugland Development. I am generally excited about and
supportive of the development as presented, but I have some specific concerns about how
this project will affect use of the Ampersand Building.
Mixing residential and commercial uses works only if all parties know what to expect.
am hopeful that each prospective buyer of a condominium will be informed about our
plans for the Ampersand Building before they make their purchase and I want to make
sure we do not miss any opportunities to minimize the potential conflict between
competing uses.
The Ampersand Building is going to undergo a substantial renovation and to do so it
necessary to understand how the Haugland project affects us. It would be helpful if we
could see an elevation from the south, a drawing that shows the height of the Haugland
development along our joint property line. We would also like to see an overhead,
showing how close to our sidewalk the Haugland development comes. This information
has not been previously available, but it vital to understanding what is proposed.
At the last public hearing, I expressed some concern about how the development would
affect the use of the roof — I was then thinking about roof top dining. An issue I did not
bring up is the problems of venting the cooking smells from a restaurant. We would like
to see an elevation from the south, looking north, that shows which windows and
balconies may face our property. We would also like to see an overhead so we can see
how close the balconies and windows come to our property line. That would help us
understand the impact of noise and cooking smells. This information has not been
previously available, but it is vital to understanding what is being proposed
Page 1 of 2
We have not heard any details about a proposed canopy. We are generally supportive of
a canopy over the sidewalk, but we have no way to determine how such a canopy might
be constructed.
Another concern is how the proposal will affect the use of the Ampersand Building's
sidewalk. I am in discussions with a prospective tenant who proposes an upscale
restaurant, for the Ampersand Building. They would access the restaurant from France
Avenue and they would also access from the existing sidewalk, along the north side of
the Ampersand Building. In addition to the new tenant, there is an existing business,
Oliver & Taylor, which uses this sidewalk as their only access.
We understand that many details remain to be resolved. However, this is the last public
hearing, the last time we can have public assurances and a public explanation as to what
is proposed.
Very truly yours,
RICHARD T. CURTIN
Page 2 of 2
March 31, 2005
Re: 501h & France Redevelopment and Proposed Transportation Policy
Edina City Council,
The purpose of this correspondence is to commend the Council with respect to its March
15 decision to approve the proposed redevelopment of the SW quadrant of 501h & France
by Haugland Companies. I genuinely believe the proposed redevelopment will
complement existing buildings /architecture and will continue to position the "iconic" 50`h
& France as one of the preeminent business districts within the greater Twin Cities.
I appreciated the opportunity'to attend the March 15 Public Hearing with presentations by
the developer, architect, and engineer; as well as to hear comments from fellow residents.
Unlike the redevelopment of the "NE quadrant" of 50`h & France several years ago;
greater attention to detail with respect to project scale, "step back" symmetry, mixed
facade composites, and preservation of sufficient sidewalk are all characteristics which
will create a truly residential/pedestrian friendly asset for our community. These
attributes should also contribute to the economic vitality and success of the commercial
tenants.
I was also truly amazed by the, speed and efficiency in which this proposal was reviewed
and approved by the various City officials including City staff, Planning Commission,
Transportation Commission, City Council and City residents via the Public Hearing. The
entire process amounted to a matter of weeks. Problem - solving and decision - making are
competencies evident in our City's government when we are truly committed to the task
at hand.
While I am supportive of the redevelopment, I remain somewhat concerned with respect
to traffic related implications for NE Edina, particularly during the construction phase
which will span nearly two years. As well documented, NE Edina has significant traffic
issues which have largely not been addressed due to the absence of a policy from which
to wide the problem - solving and decision - making phases. In 1999, traffic- calming to
50` & France diverted traffic into contiguous neighborhoods. Three years ago, traffic
issues in NE Edina were exacerbated due to construction/repairs to Hwy 100, which
reduced the number of traffic lanes. The proposed redevelopment has the potential to
have the same effect, again particularly during the construction phase.
In accordance with the definition in the proposed Transportation Policy, portions of NE
Edina could be classified as an "Impacted Area" (with respect to the redevelopment
project). While I certainly am not suggesting that I should have a right to impede the 501n
& France redevelopment, I do believe that I should have the opportunity to work with
fellow residents and city staff to address existing traffic problems and proactively protect
our neighborhood from the intrusion of additional non - residential traffic which may
result from the redevelopment project. The proposed Transportation Policy provides this
opportunity.
The practice of initiating traffic- calming measures throughout residential neighborhoods
situated adjacent to commercial districts is very common. Several nearby examples
include the cities of Minneapolis and St. Louis Park: .
• SW Minneapolis (throughout the Southwest High School neighborhood, NE of
501h & France) initiated actions many years ago and just replaced many of these
measures in November 2004 to safeguard the neighborhood and minimize non-
residential traffic.
• Minnekanda Vista (SLP) neighborhood has been "calmed" to minimize any
intrusion from the recent Excelsior and Grand redevelopment. The traffic -
calming in this neighborhood is so subtle, that it is hardly noticeable yet
effective.
These actions simply allow the coexistence of residential and commercial businesses, and
have not resulted in any adverse impact to traffic flow.
I certainly recognize and appreciate that the City has worked very diligently for over a
year to formulate a transportation policy. The process has been publicly transparent from
Day 1, allowing community input throughout the development stages. The draft policy,
passed by the Edina Transportation Commission by a 6 to 1 vote, has been readily
available to the public for five months during which time a public open house and a
public hearing were conducted by the City. This process can also be described as
democratic. The proposed policy is well thought -out and representative of existing
policies across the country. They have withstood the test of time. Therefore, I encourage
your support and passage of the proposed Transportation Policy.
Respectfully submitted,
Keith Wolf
4600 Wooddale Avenue
cc Fred Richards, ETC Chairman
Steve Lillehaug, City of Edina
r
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
f
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
f
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N
I
i 20
scxF
II
10
o
zo 40
�r
li!
Ill
I Il
I11
IIl
III
Il
I!
1jl
1jl
Il
!jl
jl
Ilj
1�1
1�
0\ OPUS.
aws w� t ate..
iaao a.e bw rm
Ifmdoita &on* 5w
tjt a ►. W-s"n
ear
wAkft co Sam
WW =me w
iwsn
wR 14 mos
ieo..m
e wsMi
A. Slm* i
�e
LL U M(tlE
• u.e � r e..w. •
rarZ.i.4. a.pr w r
n7.nlr r rata �.� .
Tire..u...../..r..
• D�a�.r u... r ae� rra
�o.e►��s..rw r a. err
•.ap.�rirr +rr � .rir�. �i
e � ps sr
ISO q
rI� tlV.
but
IW
enr� 1\ M.
JIm Ate
SMff.Sff. E
CONDrnom
7
C1.1
J
-1
Q�
t
L
FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH
PROUECT WORMATION
SITE AREA
11,277 SF SOUTH PARCEL
16.371 SF NORTH PARCEL
TOTAL SITE AREA
30,648 SF
RETAIL AREA
22403 4V
RESIDENTIAL AIWA
3 FLOORS % 24-M5 SF./FLOOR
- 73AM S.F. (24 UNITS TOTAL)
PARKING SPACES-.
µ SPACES SHMN IN GARAGE.
2 SPACES AT GRADE
PLOT DATE March 16. 2005 - 327p1n
OPUS.
Opus; AIL'dwb 8
or�rr
rr � Aosw.
M� r
AMY
m[®
2/9/05 MY MWTIIAL (ZOMNC)
3/16/05 CITY STI9RTAL
(SITE PLAN APPROVAL)
m ra
Y31_5790
■em
sa
03/16/CS
C. LARMN -
m�
S
JOHNSON
amo.
R A9fSM
1111 Id 11
• 0.a m r r r..rl- �
�.reZ r 4. m•r w r
�Ati•�w aw aO-�
O • A/b ..w
OPUS.
50TH AND
FRANCE
DEVELOPMENT
EDINA, WL
�mg
ARCHITECTURAL
SITE PLAN/
LEVEL ONE PLAN
17Al-.l1l
OPUS.
Opus Amhbets B
Enghms,
ws 7rrr
war r. murw
eet® r
amm
I I I
w10. I alo.
I I
law.
coop r.al
ww
i Slam i
I I
7,pYIQ.
T A- s
,T7
- T
.mom,
-:naw.T
---- - - - - --
-- - -- -- --
--
--
--
--
i
i
smpwa a
smwa q
r<oraa
I
r -s•
r-r
77
1
77
74
y
I
I
I
m
I
A
m
y
a :,
a®
I
I
I
i /1� 0711' S18 (ZQmIC)
I
—_—
—_—
—_—
_ —_—
W
—_—
opwoo
i
r -r
r -r
i
r-r
r-s•
i I I
I
I
I
i
i
I
I
I
I
I
=
1
7
I
i
Y7/ }790
I I I I
0• ■
S imlam
I I
I
I
I
in
17 I
is n
m
I
R X oHm
I
I
I
I
I
I
�
• euw r o. e.�.wr. r
rw,wiwro,. ww`�v
I I
�
I
I
I
i
I
7bwib rarrr�hr
I
I
I
I
�••�' •�—a ••�
smwc= s
siom a
smaa =�
sloop m
smaa n
aawas ie
I o=v. mr.
I
--- — — -- — -- — -- ---- --
— --
- -- --
-- —
,amr sow
smswx a
smwr� q s'aowx 14 smmia is I
•wore�aen m b. wi
-- --
--
--- —
— —
- - -- -- --
ergs. ,,•.w,.
i
i
i
i i
OPUS.
iL ooR PLAN - LOYVEIt Levy
I/F. I.3 ED-
1
a
PLOT DATE March 16, 2005 — 3:28pm
50TH AND
FRANCE
DEVELOPMENT
m
L»�7l 1aL
.m M
FLOOR PLAN
LOWER LEVEL
FLOOR PLAN -LEVEL Two
00 opus.
Ow9 A 8
.bm
mt..ry
wr�r �e orww
s�-ws r
m
2/9/05 CITY W arK (Zmm)
7/15/05 CRY MOMAL
(50E RAN APPRWO
® m
Y71 }Z90
wam wm
.w
G IA160N
m•.
& A NSM
IL JOHOW
• 0.w r .. rr.w. r
rr�ri sweri`r r dKm*
•wr dP"NW :alit~. W.%
•das w.y
h.+r
%\ OPUS.
..e
50TH AND
FRANCE
DEVELOPMENT
wow
E69Y1 WL
—m
FLOOR PLAN
LEVEL TWO
P PLOT DATE Ucrch 16, 2005 - 3:28pm I A2.211
L
T FLOOR PLAN- LEVELTHJM ®~
.,
L
PLOT DATE Morch 16. 2005 - 3:28pm
OPUS.
s r r r
mare r
fID.O
1/9/65 CITY S Sam (Zmmo
3/16/05 WY VAUUAL
(S11E PLAN APPRM)
MU-5790
,m oa
s
3/16
1m ifs
G WISm
s0
S JOHNSON
X JOH SM
r.wr<i. � 4.• aysr •w r
f r Y.f•rd �r \ ra.H:
r.
• a .•�/ tlii a✓t1r1 i Y w•
iw6� r r v 1e �N• r
• OY Ams� q �r r Iwa f
Pr
O • . jY �r
OPUS.
50TH AND
FRANCE
DEVELOPMENT
1®
Fond H L
t ff
FLOOR PLAN
LEVEL THREE
"
A2.3
0 FLOOR P LAN - LEVE FOUR 1 - 1
z�
ROT DATE March 16, 2005 - 3:29pm
L
OPUS.
OpO6 kditCb e
E.InL
m r r r
a.rr• r.rt..
�►e r
mo
m
2/8/06 CITY SIAIO K (ZONC6)
3/16/06 COY 9U98RAL
(SITE PUN APPBO/K)
m, v
TW�6790
wm mw
s
lam mal
t IAF=
sa
S JOHNSM
mr■
R JOHNSON
r�i.srir s 4�• e � w...+i
wort r ar ara r•. .
r- Psi � .r a w'7•T•i
•Ir d-4 r.r 14 rwWw
ark/ w rnw
0.8 Mk ww.w
rlr r
0 OPUS.
SOTH AND
FRANCE
DEVELOPMENT
UNk ml.
.vw
FLOOR PLAN
LEVEL FOUR
•, I\
\I
PLOT DATE larch 16, 2005 - 7:JOpm
,wd
1
OPUS.
om kcmw s a
s r r r
w� ewe
were r
aeo
m. e®
3/16/05 c" SLwn&
IW}79D
s
7 /16/05
� ®gym
C W601
v e
A A1660N
ams•
R JON"
e� ==12" d
eta
�a w..r. m.warv�r .�rsre
gqs bi.� oe m°��,rra
�.0w
ar W~
w.r r
OPUS.
ever
50TH AND
FRANCE
DEVELOPMENT
mw WL
DID vu
ROOF PLAN
A2.5
---------------------- ------------------
-E
41
P; w
T VE w PiI_ -
Sit i, �, 10 1 MIRWIZI
HE, 0 H . ... .... I. T -7.
--Mom
OWN
111
171,11 mologivioses= 111111101 =1111agessiol�= Mom 11211111� logo 11=- ■fssom- z- 111voill =1111::
WO ■ as -a—If
an
I M I I f S MIMAME �MEW-
_11M 1010� 1.
Mizi I.i
MEN
RA
ri. OP M 0
one—man, —imisision,=
Neill ffilin no—sonE IIIJII
noomomnmns 1115V
—mm, MINN— 0 1lWIl!lF1lW
No of 2. No
....' H.E. ROOM I NINE IN=—
Ell =11P.1211mi
OR
MUM
W I 1A ■ LN
rll'�"Idi id IMP 111131iii111id! Ill ill 1;1:11!! Illllll :lild11',11lflill.11llllll IL— MINI Elm I I
IMM, u
ME An
HUM111 I
— - --------------
MEESE==
V
an
E
lu r Ill
Igloo:
AN a
_41
N
Ird Ird A'd
1 1 I 1
1
1 I
1 .01/ amm . am.
Ird .rmo�
I Coom W.M 1 1 1
1 I
I I I
aa,da .ml
rd rd • l!1 1 i -11 u�- . 17'i 1 rd . a
4RC ID
1 I I 1
� SECTION AT EPI7ItY TO PAW071G GARAGE --
1
wo.a.n IA. lord oll.s ow
Yd 7r--r m' -r W-W 2r-r
1
1 I 1 1 I
1 I I I
s 16.1
r =wm
U."r - Wv OF RII.
I I I I
� I�TYP�'JILNORTH- SOUrH5ECT10N
L
u -
u
Y
I
b
1
1
L
b_
1 I
I 1 L
A
OLIIOOtA 4�1..
1 1
I � 1
I
-ro. ar
1
IYfd wla4 >g
]rd
I
r
I
I
I
iii AI
a
I § 1
1 s 1
T
aaa�
I � I
L
I I
I 1
PLOT DATE March 16. 2005 - 3:31pa,
OPUS.
Opus AThbeb 8
Enomm tm
wsrrr
mso r
2/9/05 CITY SAWAL (ZOWJG)
3/18/05 CITY SLOM AL
(SITE RAM APPROPAL)
®ro
IWa790
3/18/05
Iem w
C IARM
IJOHNSON
R JoHNm
•Gil.. r r ..�.ra r
Ti.r.rd mr+r r rwrl
rb th.
nrs.r.b r Ir r r ..e r
rwh ��rs r rti .rr
mPkd W w
. r Iyb
...r Ir
OPUS.
50TH AND
FRANCE
DEVELOPMENT
r®
a Nk WL
.m .IG
BUILDING
SECTIONS
lmv� A4.1
r
20 10 0 20 40
l3G1LE FAT
J
�� OPUS.
,,.
1080 &0 Hoed wad
IOeodwli% Mhou a 59a
,SZ-6Si -440 Fm 952 -W-45n
i
r rlas 4r.�s.
s0
wqm CPI OB.4
ews�9 m ea
Mt 14. 2009
�o
C. LARSal
.w
SIEMHOFF
e w
IL IEOM
..1.. rrwwr.r
O•
wwi•Z A1. w7•iY w w
wplr� 111 r N
melt r fth"
• erlr isnrw4.r mry bpd
�s.r.. r rr�7irr
d h.
• I 0°~r•rra.e
�
• r y w..l
10001
optis.
OM ee®
eeanamL ut
M A.:0w
err.• t
10m
MM AND
FRAWM
DE•LOPMOI
ess
0006 wL
0l
�
R
I' DM
D A i
����
••,,•,,
UrLffY rte'
em oe•
C1.2
J
Is
Lv ��
FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH
2DeaL roTm
- LAMOOCAM COMINACTOR SMALL ~ SM
PFIOR TO PIeMr,.e E10 To wre
Cr 6R M o
CladrILY FA11A I SM 40140TTIOR!
- ALL 1001160 AN FINIM ORADM TO S DOW
P 0001?
- NO PLARTM PILL m /OTALLM VKM ALL
SIMMONS, IMO C 007PMTM 11116 Ssl
Op PlZrW N MmIATE AIPA,
- R S M RYC10ON." e M Orem a
rgRPAd=M TO 00001 'L IPOebRCrPO
CAG m Ommm FIRM ETG- am M
- IF VIOLA! S A MG.IWAN•Y PITYIM T1!
MME OF PLAIIIII S OMIN OM THIS RAN AW
M IaMSR OF FLAMP! SOMI N M Fl..AW
LNR. M MPeDa Or FLAMM am" am M
RAN FILL TAIO r1KOBlfd
- ALL C WAPM IIA}WAL TO S OROPM N
94WAOOTR A P004 M OF O MOKIIIL
- ALL IWISINAL SMALL 42MMY PTITM M
TW ��
poll
mAt=W Sf0 JAIOD AOIIOCIATION
OF MlVBtfmm
-1l/He ALL OANAOE TO PPAPeOY FROM
FLAMM OPMATIpS AT NO COOT To M
Crum
- OLNRI1NAa TOI RAMP IM7OOAL T1sLOIlOM
pe GA 4W C.AY!M FOR OGoITO W.
V TO sYJ• GAL P 6NS "A MI To W M.
6AItl^ S> ®131 S! FROM TIME waa
TPO rNDOAR TIMLO 1'I10r1 lOe a
rROMB0IAL AGCD'rAliE.
- ALL PNpbOW PLAIIIO SMALLS LOCATW
rllmaLLY As SIaM ON M RANG AV
SMALL m APPROVm or LAIOOCAP!
AlICMIICT 680M T116r AIm OWALLED
- LArOYIlE CONTRACTM SMALL DSMe
TINT Im "Sms mvw aKIO M all APe
010 room aMLAM allm FIM SMLAR SOLD
To M SOY OF TMs PRO"? OEAvr TO
M:AVr, LOW TO LWR. WEAVY TO LOMr
- LANDW -Am CCNIRAOTOR 16 Ima0m TO
PImVa Orem RIM MNMTOIM1rd
NNSONTON OLFIMP OOMIAIRR rvTlo2
RDl.TOO 70INTOOIIL i�p16. PFIPOO,
M" NS rIN L MO RDATm allm TMs
CP S Fl�AMm Ala aDJVp1ID lO
aMa AFlea PROV0ICrNL Vr L^N 10K
A/ 091MC Mb ®1 MVDI m Lw1aYM
ARpPIC11
- FII/MPOO MAT00AL SMALL S
COmM^vm TRS PROTCTIon PPM M 013
OF TLQ r VIA. OSL) LA FAW THAN M
CAL7131 am" SS or TMQ TO S
PROTIOTm. PNM ALL TIC DOCST
INCI®ONY TIM S ALL S rROTMT W
rM= TO OA APO TUNS RDIOb® or Nl.
SwL• POLY e7e4D11PLem slClleO arIWPY
! A1CK vNrt CDODI eTTOa
=-W=%= CK nPPIR DME
srna m�Pea
- ROCK M" S S cow IV irr PIA,
MMJm R11001 POCK PPM P09 &W CLOIN
- SIIC LANDBCAM FA IPLTQ PLAT) To MA ff
A C 0 MM DOOM► OF 4A-03 m FM SY.
FAISM SIOLD Te uV. arABLInP AIV MAyE
A Fly! TEAM MOMM PlATHM AM"
PACTOR M PULL SML/2Kr. PAONr To S
rM LLlD Cum R OR BaWALDIT SAWLE
IObPRm FOR APPROVAL
- ALL FLAMM fMLL 10MVE PeRma R
AO POLLd6
W"St AND PALL rLAKrM - 015PCrQ
FO M rRI!<gV APPLY 0-20-32
ORANILAR N bYCOe AI OM PLMIr AT M
RATE OP F0 m cAm Pea 2-9` ri1L TM= t
M m CM FULL Pel Swan POAAM lI FIM
M DMe APIMW Q 10-10-40 M
MOLLQOtl &w4N&
- WD SNLL S MINLMO SOD. 9T t 100' TO W
LAO AMALLIL TO CAT7�p ILMn 1Nv!
SrA07e® XMIS, all Sore 0T�0a
TMW 0.1 pL ORASNOE SNLM M 703
SMALL m 5r=NIO M ORa/0. scARrr
MP M fO IXs10 ORAOS PsM rpO CIL CA10
TO T MIL AND Or M dMAD IS M SM
Q lOrsO< AND A To ORAOOO PM OOD.
P *MIATRY rRL I TO PLACW eOD.
cGNrR/1GTlR syaL APPLY 10•
n Pa
Peeruama wr M RATE or pas Pea
Inca m R
• aALWM OF ALL TRS TOW" W To Alp
WAIOMO Y SMALL S reAOINS Y D2
AVE
OPOPO LEVEL. AIO S PROVE OROMa
LN6 r10R LARODI Nm
- ommu 10 SRm SMALL INK M KN Or
FIVE B CANS AT sPeaP W MDO Tr MLM
OTIDVfyS MMW N FLAW LOT.
- IF M CONTRACTOR r015.0 AM BOWL MAIL
EM MAm RmMmPIS SPACNO OR
MYIOOIIIIIS or A SY,Qs OF RANT
MATESAL 81016A720 ON M PLAN. IOMrr
M L.AIPOCAM ANDOWT PAM TO M
INSTALLATION OF PLANT KODUAL
ALL 10LY INSTALLED FLAIR rNTeNAL
'JLALA m FLAMTO N TQL-0RAPm wRw
6ONIRACTOR SNIL AVOO ft"I. AKr
FLAW IYLTOIIAL N ORAMAOE OMALe1 OR
FIT P PCOMY ORMNm AREAS
Al
sti
W17Y
5 lifir
Page 1 of 1
AGENDA ITEM: IV.A.
Darlene Wallin
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 8:44 AM
To: Darlene Wallin
Subject: FW: 50th & France
Importance: High
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Kitty ODea [mailto:kittyodea @mn.rr.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 12:58 AM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: 50th & France
importance: High
To City Council -
As I said at the meeting, I do think the mixed -use development is an exciting concept at 50th & France, but I am
really disappointed that there isn't more serious consideration about the residual traffic problems 50th & France
generates. Reality is that the Haugland traffic study was insufficient and we will potentially see an increase of
several hundred cars per day. Given the already congested situation, those cars will end up in the adjacent
neighborhoods. The situation will only become more critical as the east side of 50th is developed. I am fine with
development, but not if it is at the expense of the surrounding neighborhoods. That's a win -lose situation.
This could be a win -win situation. St. Louis Park went to extraordinary means to protect nearby neighborhoods
from any negative impact from Excelsior and Grand. A comprehensive traffic study was done, the medians were
changed, turn signal timing was changed, entrances to neighborhoods were controlled and there are stop signs
on every corner. They saw the opportunity to improve the entire area, not just the commercial development. I
don't see the same approach being taken by Edina. You can't look at 50th & France in a vacuume. You have a
fiduciary responsibility to all the citizens of Edina, not just the developers /commercial districts. At a minimum the
Council should commit to a comprehensive traffic plan to address the issues in the area. This is bigger than the
NTMP. The City needs to get ahead of the problem. What will it take to get this done?
Sincerely,
Kitty O'Dea
3/16/2005
AGENDA ITEM: IV.A.
From: Jesenia Morales (mailto:Jesenia.Morales @chrobinson.com]
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 4:53 PM
To: dapeterson @startribune.com
Subject: Your story about 50th & France
Importance: High
Good afternoon Mr. Peterson,
I hope this finds you well. I just read your story online regarding the 50th & France remodel. Seems
they're trying to go for the Excelsior Grand look with condo's and a Mojito restaurant at the corner. How
absolutely revolting.
I moved from NYC 2 years ago and I have a friend with an office on 50th & France (Peter Hill Design).
He also (with his partner Kim formerly of Belle Epoque) opened up Alfred's on 44th & France with the
same upscale spirits associated with the current 50th /France. Coming from NYC and having experienced
the shopping feel of 5th Ave, SOHO and the upper west side, I instantly fell in love with the 50th & France
area. It was not clich6. It was not chain store galore. It gave a feeling of uniqueness, and was
purposefully special for those that chose to shop there. And now...
...Now it will be pathetically homogenous to the rest of the shopping districts. What's next ... a Macy's? Or
better yet, Kohl's. The feel of the area was never meant to be voluntarily disclosed and invited to all, but
rather discovered by those that sought to find it. Now it will just be ... ordinary. Oh what an incredibly
boring and sad prospect.
Please, if you can, forward this to whomever is responsible for killing the beauty of unique exclusivity.
You'll probably find them at the comer Starbucks ... as unique as a bodega on a NYC street.
Regards,
Jesenia Morales
"bet it right the first time - that's the main thing.
6et it right the next time.. that's not the same thing.. "
CM - Finance /Foodservice
C.H. Robinson
8967 Columbine Road, Suite 900
Eden Prairie, MN 55347
Phone: 952.946.4921
Fax: 952.937.7703
jesenia.morales@chrobinson.com
A,
Z�-
o Le vv
�NBB .
AGENDA NO. IV.B.
PUBLIC HEARING -
FINAL REZONING & FINAL PLAT APPROVAL
MARK JONES/PUKWANA TOWNHOMES
512549TH STREET WEST
TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT
CONTINUED TO 5/3/05
Z No packet data
F-] Oral presentation
Information coming
rr, '�
° e o REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # IV. C.
From: Craig ,Larsen 0 Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Date: April, 19, 2005 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
❑To Council
Subject: Conditional Use Permit for Action ® Motion
Two New Gymnasiums — ❑ResOlutlon
Edina Community Center
El ordinance
Campus
❑ Discussion
Recommendation:
The Planning Commission recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit to add one gym to
the Community Center and one to South View Middle School.
Info /Background:
See attached Planning Commission minutes, staff report, traffic study and plans.
L;
G
u
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # IV. C.
From: Craig Larsen Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Date: April 19, 2005 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
Subject: Conditional Use Permit for ❑To Council
Action ®Motion
Two New Gymnasiums — ❑Resolution
Edina Community Center
Campus ❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Recommendation:
The Planning Commission recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit to add one gym to
the Community Center and one to South View Middle School.
Info /Background:
See attached Planning Commission minutes, staff report, traffic study and plans.
LOCATION MAP
Edina Overview
C -05 -2
Conditional: Use Permit
City of`Edina /School District
N ,
DRAFT MINUTES
PC Meeting March 30, 2005
C -05 -2 City of Edina /ISD # 273
Edina Community Center and Southview Campus
Proposal to construct two (2) gyms
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the City is requesting a Conditional
Use Permit to allow for the construction of two new gymnasiums on the campus.
One gym is attached to the Community Center, and the other added to
Southview Middle School.
Mr. Larsen explained the City Council and Edina School Board held a joint
public hearing on November 26, 2004. Following that hearing each body voted
to proceed and enter into a joint use agreement with the new facilities paid for by
the City.
Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends approval of the requested
Conditional Use Permit subject to watershed district permits.
Mr. Rozeboom, project architect was present to respond to questions. Mr.
John Keprios was present representing the City of Edina.
Mr. Rozeboom addressed the Commission and with the aide of graphics
pointed out to the Commission the locations of the proposed gyms, greenspace
and traffic circulation patterns of the proposal. Mr. Rozeboom pointed out one
aspect of the project is that school district users can move between the
community Center /middle School and the new gyms internally. This flow makes
the "joint use" component of the project work well.
Mr. Keprios explained the need for additional gyms resulted from the
growth and desire of the City's recreational user groups for more gym space.
Continuing, Mr. Keprios told the Commission over the past decade the City along
with the user groups has had an ongoing discussion on how to provide additional
gym space to meet the demands of our growing leagues. Mr. Keprios said
different sites were looked at to achieve more gym space, one being the
Northwest Racquet site, which did not work out. Concluding Mr. Keprios noted
traffic congestion will be eased when events are not scheduled simultaneously,
and the school district and user groups are mindful of this.
Commissioner Brown asked Mr. Keprios whom the user groups schedule
their activities with. Mr. Keprios responded user groups would continue to
schedule activities through City offices. Commissioner Brown asked if user fees
would be increased as a result of construction of the new gyms. Mr. Keprios
responded user fees would be increased with hourly fees set by the district and a
one -time yearly fee set by the City.
Ms. Friedman, 6612 Sally Lane, addressed the Commission and informed
them the EGAA is very happy with the proposed new gyms. She explained
house league sports continue to grow and any traffic generated is usually not that
intense. She pointed out most user groups car -pool, which reduces the number
of vehicles coming and going. She added house league activities usually do not
meet on weekends except during championship games, which occur a couple
times a year. Concluding, Ms. Friedman said she believes the addition of two
new gyms is a wonderful asset for Edina's youth and the entire community.
Commissioner Brown moved to recommend Conditional Use Permit
Approval. Commissioner Grabiel seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion
carried.
Commissioner Fischer told the Commission he believes the re- design of
the campus along with the placement of the two new gyms will actually improve
the existing situation, and reduce impact to the neighborhood.
Regular Meeting of the
Edina Planning Commission
Wednesday, March 30, 2005, 7:00 PM
Edina City Hall Council Chambers
Staff Report
Case Number:
C -05 -2
Location:
Edina Community Center and Southview campus
Applicant:
City of Edina
Property owner:
Edina Schools, ISD # 273
Request:
Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of two, new gymnasiums on the
campus. One attached to the Community Center, and one added to Southview
Middle School.
Background:
The City Council and Edina School Board held a joint public hearing to get input
on the proposed gyms on November 16, 2004. Following that hearing each body
voted to proceed and enter into a joint use agreement (agreement attached).
The new facilities would be built and paid for by the City.
Project Description:
The attached schematic design report, prepared by the project architect, contains
a detailed description of the proposed gyms. Each addition contains
approximately 10,000 square feet of total floor area. The addition to the
Community Center requires the removal of the non - conforming buildings on the
south end of the Center. Parking on the campus would remain as approved
earlier for the bond referendum project.
Parking and Traffic:
The City engaged a traffic consultant to analyze the impact of the gyms on
parking and traffic in the neighborhood. The consultant's report is attached.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the requested Conditional Use Permit.
Refer to:
City Council minutes from November 16, and December 7, 2004. Memo from
John Keprios, report by Rozeboom Miller Architects, and traffic study by Howard
R. Green Co.
Nov. 16, 2004 Edina City Council Special Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 4
MINUTES
OF THE SPECIAL JOINT MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND EDINA SCHOOL BOARD
HELD AT CITY HALL
NOVEMBER 16, 2004
6:30 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Housh, Hovland, Masica and Mayor Maetzold.
Member Kelly was absent.
Mayor Maetzold stated the purpose of the Joint Meeting was to gather information and hear public
testimony regarding the possibility of building two gymnasiums on the Edina Community Center
Campus as part of the renovations currently underway.
Park Director Presentation
Park Director Keprios informed the Council and School Board that 211 notices had been mailed
November 3, 2004, to property owners within 500 feet of the Edina Community Center east
campus informing residents of the Joint Public Hearing. He explained that the proposal before the
Council /Board would construct two new gymnasiums on the Edina Community Center east
campus. He outlined the proposal as follows:
PROPOSAL IN CONCEPT
• Need for additional gymnasiums for community use (youth athletic associations).
• One additional gymnasium to South View Middle School.
• One additional gymnasium to Edina Community Center.
• City of Edina will pay for all construction costs and architect/ engineering fees.
• City of Edina will assume responsibility for 100% of all operating expenses.
CONSTRUCTION FINANCING
• Project costs approximately $4.12 million.
• City of Edina (HRA /City Council) would sell lease revenue bonds to finance construction.
• 20 -year bonds = $370,000 debt expense per year.
• Equates to approximately 2.5% increase in City tax levy.
COST PER HOME
OPERATIONAL COSTS
• Expenses $40,000 per year ($20,000 per gym).
• Gymnasium rental fees
(1,356 hours Q $6 per hour) $ 8,136
• Participant user fees
($8 per participant per season) $16,288
• Donations
($5,000 per year for 10 years) $ 5,000
• City costs (other revenues/ donations) $10,576
• TOTAL $40,000
PROCESS
• Public Hearing; November 16, 2004.
• School District and City will develop a Facility Use Agreement.
• City -based programs will have priority access evenings and weekends.
• Gym user fees will be similar for all gyms.
http:// www. ci .edina.mn.us/Pages /CityCouncil MeetingMinutes /20041116Spec.htm 3/24/2005
Nov. 16, 2004 Edina City Council Special Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 4
• Construction Agreement between City and School District.
• Lease Agreement (School District owns property).
• Formal action by Board of Education and City Council December 7, 2004.
• Program/ schematic design 60 -days (user group input).
• Conditional Use Permit following schematic design.
• Council calls for sale of bonds February.
• Construction begins in 2005.
Council and Board members asked questions regarding the proposed gymnasium additions
including:
• Definition of priority user groups - During City use time - City Youth Athletic groups;
School time - Kids Club
• Parking impact estimate - Preliminary discussions suggest that School District would
control use of facilities and if they deem inadequate parking for event, they may deny
• Amount of bleacher seating - Anticipated three risers on one side of each gym
• Fees derivation - School District will set hourly use fee
• Fund raising for operating dollars - $10,000 /year for five years pledged with belief more is
forthcoming
• Mark Ruff, Ehlers Associates briefly reviewed bond process. Mr. Ruff stated the sale
would be a fairly simple sale: City Attorney will write technical documents while the
facility use agreements between City and School District were negotiated; bonds would be
rated with a sale called in February for late February or early March; City to receive
proceeds from sale in March.
Public Comment
Dick Ward, 6809 Galway Drive, representing Edina Basketball Association, stated the Association
served 1,000 Edina children, and gave the Associations overwhelming support of the proposal.
He stated they had over 300 signatures on a petition to present to the City Council and School
Board. Mr. Ward said they had been waiting a long time while the demand has continued to
grow. He noted no new gyms have been built since the Edina High School was built. Mr. Ward
urged the Council/ Board to move forward stating it was the right time and the right place for the
gyms.
Marcia Friedman, 6613 Sally Lane, President of Edina Girls Athletic Association, stated they have
over 1,000 girls involved in basketball and volleyball. Ms. Friedman said her association was
totally in support of the m proposal. She explained that they currently have limited accessibility
to gyms and with enrollment substantially increasing over the last five years this has been a
concern. Ms. Friedman also presented a petition in support of the gym proposal.
Jack Field, 5418 Creek View Lane, President of the Edina Girls Traveling Basketball Association
stated he had the suppor -of 128 families. He noted that they have 5t' graders scheduled at 8:00
�m. b g` �9 ders }o a or ten 'cl ck. Field added that his ou ets
izmpe� ie le igh Scl o� needs me gyms ffairpy o�ten. He said this was a growu�pr�g�am
and the competition for gym space is difficult. Mr. Field stated his belief that Edina must keep up
with surrounding communities to stay competitive. He urged the Council /Board to approve the
proposals adding his hope that the gyms would be full size basketball courts.
Jane Tierney, Edina Kids Club, Edina Community Education, stated they serve 500 kids before and
after school. She said the Hut is not ideal, but currently the only area they have and urged that the
gyms be available for use by Kids Club. She presented a petition with over 800 signatures.
Frank Bennett, 4704 White Oaks Road, said that ten years ago he promised to help work for
additional gyms. He stated he believed this was a wonderful opportunity for the community. Mr.
Bennett urged the Council/ Board to move forward positively.
httn-// www. ci .edina.mn.us/Pages /CitvCouncil MeetineMinutes /20041116Snec.htm 3/24/2005
Nov. 16, 2004 Edina City Council Special Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 4
Mike Breitenbecher, 5532 Concord Avenue, stated he supported the proposal, adding he and his
family enjoy being able to walk over to use the Community Center facilities. He said he thought
the gyms will add value to his neighborhood and that would outweigh any traffic issues.
Kathleen Lennen, 4507 Moorland Avenue, stated she was the parent of students involved in
basketball. She asked that the new gyms be not used only for "elite" but for all students. Ms.
Lennen urged that the Council / Board keep more kids playing.
Tony Tsakakis, 661-2 Paiute Pass, said he had two girls in basketball. Mr. Tsakakis stated he
supported buildin Bthe gyms. He added other communities have the facilities they need and
T
urged the Council
to move ahead and make the commitment.
Elaine Carlson, 5821 Eastview Lane, asked if available parking had been factored into the proposed
gyms. She expressed concern about both traffic and parking on -site.
Doug John, 5119 Valley View, Director of Community Education Services, explained that with the
renovation of the Edina Community Center Campus, approximately 60 -70 parking spaces would
be added. He added that the new gyms would primarily be used in the evenings for practice
when there typically is not a huge demand on parking. He said that the District would factor in all
uses before deciding whether to schedule a particular event. Mr. Johnson said they did not
anticipate very much would be scheduled in the gyms during the school day. He added that the
parking at South View Middle School would remain the same.
Charlie Gits, 5311 Evanswood Lane, stated he was a parent and former president of the Soccer
Association. He noted that the two new soccer fields developed by the City have totally re-
energized soccer. New gyms will have the same effect on both volleyball and basketball. Mr. Gits
urged moving forward with the gyms.
Jeff Krause, Head Volleyball Coach, Edina High School, stated he believed these facilities would go
a long way to help develop a girls volleyball association. Two gyms will be an excellent start.
Jody Kozlak, 4632 Browndale Avenue, informed the Council /Board that last evening her 12 year
old arrived home at 10:30 p.m. and had to be at school at 7:30 a.m. the next morning. Ms. Kozlak
said that year after year more and more kids would be affected in this negative way if more gyms
cannot be built. She stated this appeared to be an opportunity to develop multiuse facilities and
urged the Council /Board to move forward on the proposal.
Mary Franze, 5717 Chowen Avenue, stated some concerns from the Normandale Elementary
School Site Council. Mr. Frame said they had concern regarding: safety, reducing available
walking space, increased stress on their facility, connecting another public venue, and logistics of
the 3:00 dismissal time. Ms. Frame asked that other spaces be evaluated before committing to this
proposal.
Member Masica made a motion, seconded by Member Housh to close the public hearing at 7.29
p.m. for in person testimony, however, the record will remain open for the next two weeks for
written submissions.
Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Masica, Maetzold
Motion carried.
Member Hovland made a motion to continue consideration of the gymnasiums proposals until
the December 7, 2004, Regular Council Meeting. Member Housh seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Masica, Maetzold
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Maetzold declared the meeting
adjourned at 7:29 P.M.
httv:// www. ci .edina.mn.us/Pages /CitvCouncil MeetingMinutes /20041116Svec.htm 3/24/2005
L
MINUTES Page 4 of 18
- 3390 54 <h on
made by Member Masica and seconded b oush for award of bid for two
-.
replacement vehicles for the Ass epartment to recommended sole bidder Elk River Ford
at $23,894.00, unde innesota Contract #433399.
x -five a es.
i
i, ' l GYMNASIUM PROPOSAL PRESENTATION Mayor Maetzold indicated at the November 16,
t:.
A, 2004, Council and Board of Education public hearing, the gymnasium proposal, in concept,
1V included:
• One additional gymnasium to South View Middle School
• One additional gymnasium to Edina Community Center
r . City of Edina will pay for all construction costs and architect/ engineering fees
• City of Edina will assume responsibility for 100% of all operating expenses
Total project costs were estimated at $4.12 million. The City of Edina would sell lease revenue
q bonds to finance construction. The 20 -year bonds would cost roughly $370,000 per year, which
equates to a 2.5% increase in the City tax levy.
t Mayor Maetzold inquired if the Council approved the gymnasium proposal, what subsequent
4 steps would be taken. Mr. Hughes said the steps would be, 1) a facility use agreement, 2) a joint
powers agreement, 3) formal approval from the Board of Education, 4) programming and
schematic design from the Board's project architect, 5) the Board would apply to the City for a
Conditional Use Permit with the Planning Commission, 6) following the Planning Commission's
approval, the issue would be before the Council, 7) the Council's approval of the Conditional Use
Permit for the project, 8) the Board's architect would proceed to prepare detailed drawings, 9) the
Council would need to approve drawings and preliminary cost estimates of the project, 10) bids
would be sought, considered by the Board, and, 11) the City would conduct a bond sale.
Member Masica asked if the construction manager and architect have to go out for bid again. Mr.
Hughes said they were engaged by the School District for their ongoing projects pursuant to the
referendum, and their services would be maintained. Following approval of the design, public
bids would be sought on the construction contracts.
Member Maetzold asked if the HRA as well as the Council should execute the facility use
agreement and the joint powers agreement. Attorney Gilligan said the bonds were issued by the
BRA and proceeds made available to the City to construct the facility with a lease between the
BRA and the City. The City would appoint the school district as its agent to construct the facility.
It was not necessary to have the HRA as a party to these agreements but there will be agreements
between the HRA and City connected with the bond sale. Mr. Hughes noted the Board of
Commissioners of the HRA was the City Council.
Mayor Maetzold inquired of the Council whether the public hearing should be re- opened.
Member Masica made a motion to re -open the public hearing on the gymnasium proposal.
Member Kelly seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold
Motion carried.
Mayor Maetzold called for comments in opposition to the gymnasium proposal.
httn:// www. ci .edina.mn.us/Pages /CityCouncil MeetingMinutes /20041207Reg.htm 3/25/2005
MINUTES Page 5 of 18
Public Comment
Maria Fesenmaier, 5713 Concord Avenue, representing the Edina Community Center
Neighborhood Association, stated the Association was vehemently opposed to additional gyms if
nothing was done to correct traffic safety, student and resident safety, and parking. Ms.
Fesenmaier stated the Association represented 567 homes and she added she was disappointed in
the notice of the original public hearing. Ms. Fesenmaier said the Association felt a mistrust of the
process being followed relative to the proposed gymnasiums.
Trish Kolkman, 5612 St. Andrews Avenue, read a statement from resident Dan Rectenwald who
could not be present stating his opposition. Ms. Kolkman also spoke about her own opposition to
the proposal because of traffic and safety concerns.
Wayne Kewitsch, 5615 Dalrymple Road, stated he had been a resident since 1969. Mr. Kewitsch
said he was not opposed to the gymnasiums, but that the increased traffic must be studied and
measures put into place to mitigate the negative impact on the surrounding neighborhood from all
the proposed improvements taking place on the ECC campus, not just the two additional gyms.
He stated he was very disappointed that the Council was moving forward on the gyms when there
was going to be an additional load on the neighborhood because of the addition to the auditorium
and the renovated swimming pool.
Susan Covnick, 47,15 Golf . Terrace, explained the Edina Community Center Neighborhood
Association included homes between Wooddale Avenue to Highway 100 east to west and Edina
Country Club to Valley View Road north to south. Ms. Covnick asked the Council to guarantee
that any future development would be limited as part of their motion relative to the gymnasiums.
Kelsey Smith, 4801 West 44t` Street, stated he attended the meeting for a different reason, but after
listening to the neighbors speak, urged the Council to find a different space for the proposed
gymnasiums. He suggested that Fred Richards Golf Course was a potential location.
Marcia Friedman, 6613 Sally Lane, assured the audience members that there would only be one
boy's and one girl's tournament annually. She stated that in her opinion, traffic and parking
would improve when the projects at the Edina Community Center Campus were completed.
Council Discussion /Action
Member Kelly stated the Council has heard from everyone and know there existed an acute need
for additional gym space in Edina. He said in his opinion adding the two proposed gyms to the
Edina Community "Center Campus was the appropriate location for the gyms. Member Kelly
pointed out building the gyms as proposed would: 1) allow for efficiency of operation, 2) allow the
City to take advantage of the construction already planned and, 3) would also benefit Community
Education. He suggested moving forward to the next step.
Member Housh agreed with Member Kelly. He added he appreciated the neighborhood
comments. Member Housh noted he had been a Council member for four years and the need for
additional gyms has been well established. He stated he felt the Edina Community Center was
appropriate because it also was a community- gathering place. Member Housh said the Council
must look at the needs of the entire community and balance those needs with fiscal responsibility,
httv:// www. ci .edina.mn.us/Pages /CityCouncil MeetingMinutes /20041207Reg.htm 3/25/2005
MINUTES Page 6 of 18
adding he intended to support the proposed gyms.
Member Masica acknowledged the neighbor's comments, but pointed out there has been a
demonstrated need for additional gyms for many years. She added that she believed if the facility
were as well designed as she believed it will be, there may be a lessening of the impact on the
neighborhood because traffic and parking will be directed to the opposite side of the campus.
Finally, Member Masica stated she could live with the traffic generated if it were in her
neighborhood. She pointed out that she had not supported the installation of a bubble over,
Kuhlman, but she really felt the ECC Campus would be able to support the proposed gyms.
Member Hovland pointed out the City had sent out over two hundred notices on the third of
November for the November 16, 2004, hearing. He added the neighbors were present at the
November 16, 2004, hearing and chose not to speak. Member Hovland stated that he and Member
Kelly have been working on locating additional gymnasiums since 1998. He said during the
February 15, 2001, Blue Ribbon Hearing when four basketball courts were proposed for the Edina
Community Center Campus, no neighbors spoke against them. Member Hovland acknowledged
the difficulty of the neighborhood's location in proximity to the schools. However, he said he has
carefully studied the issue and will be making a careful decision in favor of the proposed gyms.
Mayor Maetzold agreed with Member Hovland regarding the notices of the meeting. He added
that during his tenure on the City Council, the Council has conducted the public's business in
public, openly and honestly. Mayor Maetzold stated that he and his fellow Council Members do
not have "side" meetings and if more than three members were together they post the "meeting."
He pointed out that since moving to the new city hall, meetings were televised so citizens have
more accessibility to meetings than ever. Mayor Maetzold said that in 1990 the Edina School
District had 5,500 students while today there were approximately 7,500 school age children. In
addition, girl's athletics has had a large impact on facilities use. This need was only going to grow
as more youngsters participate in activities. He stated that in his opinion locating the gyms at
school sites made sense for many reasons including: 1) efficiency of operation, 2) mutual benefits
to Community Education, and, 3) the expense of operating a stand alone facility. Mayor Maetzold
indicated his support for the proposed gyms.
Member Kelly made a motion approving the gymnasium proposal subject to the Facility Use
Agreement and joint Powers Agreement as well as subject to the issuance of a Conditional Use
Permit. Member Housh seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold
Motion carried.
VV11Vir, t1v4w Vnrux Ll%_EngzC7 — t1LrI%ELJ a7 V rGlll 1VliL",ftaalry
RETAIL INC. D LFRED'S CAFE - 4388 f`i "AVE E SOUTH Manager Hughes
noted that an application recei�r^ed•Yrom the owner of Alfred's Grand Petit Magasin
Retail, Inc., dba /Alfred's Cafe at- 38 ce Avenue South, The site was formerly occupied by
may,
Durr, Ltd. The necessarv,.d� ments for liquo ' nses and all applicable fees have been paid. The
Planning, He�a3f &`Pi olice Departments have com d their investigations with no negative
findin aff recommends approving the On -Sale Wine an er licenses for Alfred's Grand Petit
agasin Retail, Inc., dba /Alfred's Cafe for the period begituiin ecember 7, 2004 and ending
March 31, 2005.
httn:// www. ci .edina.mn.us/Pages/CityCouncil MeetingMinutes /20041207Reg.htm 3/25/2005
''r r�
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: CRAIG LARS
FROM: JOHN KEPRI S
SUBJECT: JPOC, & PROG M DESIGN COMMITTEE.
DATE: MARCH 22, 2005
JPOC
In follow up to our conversation earlier today, in accordance with the Joint Powers
Agreement between the City of Edina and Independent School District No 273, we have
formed a Joint Powers Oversight Committee (JPOC). The members of JPOC are:
Jim Hovland, Mayor of Edina
Scot Housh, Council Member
Ed MacHolda, Assistant Director
John Keprios, Director
Peyton Robb, Board of Education Member
Jeff Johnson, Board of Education Member
Doug Johnson, Director of Community Services
Jay Willemssen, Business Director
The main function of this eight- person committee is to advise the City of design,
contracts, payments of bills, and other construction issues that may arise.
The architect under contract with the City of Edina to design these two gymnasiums is
Rozeboom/Miller Architects, which is the same architect firm hired by the School
District to design their new referendum approved projects at the Edina Community
Center Campus. The construction manager for the gymnasiums is Kraus Anderson,
which is also the same construction management firm contracted with the school district.
JPOC has already met four times to review design drawings and plans. The initial
estimates were around $4.12 million for both gyms, including soft costs. After the
Program Design Committee's input, the design of the facilities changed in a manner that
added approximately 1,000 square feet. The estimated cost now is $5.22 million, which
JPOC is recommending can be reduced somewhat with value engineering. The elevator
added significant cost to the project, plus unexpected significant soil corrections at the
South View gym site, plus additional lobby & vestibule space, expanded floor space for
bleacher area, concessions area, translucent glass, and entrance modifications also
41 ,
contributed to the higher estimates. JPOC is currently recommending that the architect
identify value - engineering options that will bring total project costs to under $5 million.
The next JPOC meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, March 29, 2005, at 7:30 a.m. to take
action on the new schematic drawings and value engineering options. JPOC's
recommendations will be made prior to the Planning Commission meeting scheduled for
Wednesday, March 30th.
PROGRAM DESIGN COMMITTEE
As part of the program design process, I invited gymnasium facility user groups and a
representative from the Edina Community Center Campus Neighborhood Committee,
Dan Rechtenwald, and school district staff, and Ed MacHolda to serve as the Ad -Hoc
Program Design Committee. Representatives from the Edina Basketball Association,
Edina Girls Traveling Basketball Association, and Edina Girls Athletic Association
attended a handful of program design input meetings and provided valuable input into the
design of these two gymnasium buildings. Their input included a strong desire for:
• Wood floors in both gyms.
• An elevator in the South View gym.
• No air conditioning in either gym.
• Ceiling height minimums for volleyball.
• Six retractable basketball backboards in each gym.
• Bleacher seating for less than 100.
• Regulation volleyball standards & nets.
• Access to other gyms within the building without having to go outside.
• No need for concessions stand.
• Desire to play soccer, baseball, lacrosse and football in both gyms.
• Retractable batting cage for one gym.
• Make entrance more visible by extending Plaza.
• Create better drop - off/pickup by sliding the ADA parking to the south and pulling
the curb slightly away from the building.
• Create better viewing of parking pickup and stadium by reversing the
restrooms /concessions with the lobby.
• Add exterior lighting.
• Add signage.
As you can see, the Ad -Hoc Program Committee provided valuable input into the design
of both gyms.
Please let me know if you need any further information. Many thanks.
2
4
Howard R. Green Company
MEMO
To: Craig Larsen; Wayne Houle, PE; Steve Lillehaug, PE
City of Edina, MN
From: Steve Manhart, PE, PTOE�`
Subject: Community Center and South View Gymnasium Traffic Study
Date: March 16, 2005
Introduction
The City of Edina and Edina Public Schools have undertaken a project to expand the Edina
Community Center and South View Middle School on the Community Center campus located
south of Southview Lane between Concord Avenue and Normandale Road. These expansions
include building additions coupled with a parking lot expansion and reconfiguration. Of particular
interest to the City and the School District is the addition of two new gymnasiums — one adjacent
to the Edina Community Center and one at South View Middle School.
Per City request, Howard R. Green Company (HRG) has been authorized to conduct a review of
the internal and off -site traffic and parking impacts associated with the construction of these two
new gymnasiums. Specifically, the goal of this study is to determine whether the proposed
gymnasiums will adversely impact the traffic and parking in the area.
This analysis shows that traffic and parking demand increases with the construction of the new
gymnasiums. Nevertheless, the study shows that the increased traffic will not adversely impact
the capacity of the roadways in the study area. Furthermore, upon completion of the proposed
parking lot modifications, the on -street and off - street parking supply will adequately serve the
daytime, evening and weekend tournament demands.
Study Area
This study is focused on an area north of 60'" Street W., east of TH 100, south of Lakeview Drive,
and west of Wooddale Avenue. Figure 1 shows the study area and highlights the location of the
Edina Community Center campus.
The existing Community Center building once served as the location of Edina East High School.
After the closing of Edina East High School in 1981 -82, the existing building was converted into
the Edina Community Center. Currently the Community Center shares its space with Normandale
Elementary French Immersion School. The Community Center houses a variety of daytime and
evening activities and events, both during the week and on weekends. Approximately 600
students are enrolled at Normandale Elementary School, which is considered an alternate
education program school serving grades K through 5.
South View Middle School has existed in its present location for several decades. Currently, it
serves 1100 students in grades 6 through 9.
Building expansions are underway for Normandale Elementary French Immersion School, the
Community Center and South View Middle School. The locations of the building additions and the
two additional gymnasiums are highlighted. The parking lots are being expanded and
reconfigured near these buildings.
Currently the Community Center houses two gyms — one large and one small. South View Middle
School also houses two gyms. Two new gymnasiums are being constructed as part of this
campus development project. A new City gymnasium will be constructed on the southeast corner
of the Edina Community Center building. Another new City gymnasium will be constructed on the
south side of the existing South View Middle School just to the northwest of the South View
parking lot. The existing gyms will remain in use, even after the construction of the new gyms is
completed.
It is important to note that these new gymnasiums will be in addition to the existing gymnasium
space located in the Community Center and South View Middle School. Each gym will be
approximately 65' by 120' and will not house formal bleachers. It is intended that these gyms be
"multi - purpose ", and thus are able to accommodate a variety of uses.
Existing Land Use
According to the City's Land Use Plan (from March 1999), the study area is "quasi - public"
surrounded by single - family residential zoning. The City's "quasi- public" zoning refers to multiple
uses such as schools, community centers, golf courses, etc.
In this study area, the quasi - public uses include the Community Center, South View Middle
School, Normandale Elementary French Immersion'School, Concord Elementary School, and the
associated parking lots, and athletic fields. This land use also incorporates Kuhlman Field, which
serves outdoor sports activities such as football, soccer and track & field athletics. The bleachers
at Kuhlman Field seat up to 8,000 people.
The single - family residential uses in this study area generally refer to single - family homes with
driveways and garages.
Historic and Existing Traffic Demand
Traffic in the study area is split between the trips generated by the residential uses and the trips
generated by the quasi - public uses. Figures 2A through 2D illustrate traffic volumes recorded
historically by the City of Edina within the study area between 1975 and 2004. Figures 2A
through 2C show weekday 24 -hour traffic volumes, while Figure 21) shows weekend 24 -hour
traffic volumes recorded by the City.
These historic traffic counts show variations in traffic volumes over the decades. In general over
the last thirty years, the trend has been upward. For instance, in 1975 the daily traffic volume on
Southview Lane was 1703 vehicles per day, while in 2001 the daily traffic volume was 3675
vehicles per day. Reasons for this historical increase may be based on the changing land uses in
Community Center and South View Gymnasium Traffic Study
City of Edina, MN
0:\PROJ1824960J\Rpt#1- Rev1sed 031605 -Final Draft.doc
03i16W
Page 2
the area (high school to community center), changes in demographics, and /or increases in
number of vehicles per household.
Also the historical trend has been that the weekday 24 -hour traffic volume is characteristically
greater than the Saturday or Sunday 24 -hour traffic volumes. This is because more work - related
traffic is generated during the week than during weekends.
Figure 3 illustrates the relationship between average daily traffic volumes and levels of service
based on types of roadway. Level of Service (LOS) is a letter designation that describes a range
of operating conditions on a particular type of roadway facility, with LOS -A referring to free -flow
conditions and LOS -F describing system breakdown. The vast majority of roadways in the study
area are two -lane undivided roadways without turn lanes. According to the daily traffic volumes
recorded throughout the last three decades, most study area roadways operate at LOS -A or LOS -
B. (NOTE: Roadway operations in the Twin Cities area are generally considered acceptable
when operating at LOS-13 or better.)
Although not field verified by traffic counts, it is assumed that the traffic patterns of the single -
family residential uses corresponds to traditional directional peak hours outbound from the study
area in the period between 6:00 and 8:00 am, and inbound in the period between 4:00 and 6:00
pm.
There are distinctive periods of daily activity at the schools and the Community Center within the
study area. During the school year, South View Middle School hours are from 7:45 am to 2:40
pm, and both Normandale Elementary School and Concord School hours are from 8:35 am to
3:05 pm. School related traffic generally approaches the schools between 7:00 and 9:00 am, and
departs the site between 2:30 and 4:00 pm.
The Community Center provides a variety of programs and activities throughout the day and
evening. As a result, the peak inbound and outbound traffic periods are less definitive than the
residential and school traffic in the area.
In the evenings, traffic patterns in the study area vary widely, based on the programs, activities
and events scheduled at each facility. According to the Edina School District and the City of
Edina's Park and Recreation Office, the existing gymnasiums are scheduled for practices on
Mondays, Tuesdays, Thursdays and Fridays between October and April by youth basketball and
volleyball leagues. Ninety- minute practices are scheduled in shifts between 6:00 and 9:30 pm.
On Wednesdays, adult basketball is scheduled between 6:00 and 10:00 pm. Also, there is
demand from out -of- season youth sports leagues (i.e., traveling baseball, traveling soccer, etc.)
for indoor practice and conditioning when facilities are available.
Evening events and special programs may draw a variety of traffic to the schools or the
Community Center. The youth sports activities tend to draw drop -off and pick -up traffic before
and after the scheduled practices, as well as traffic from coaches or others.
On selected weekends between October and April, there are tournaments that draw teams,
coaches and parents from surrounding communities for games. Leagues that host tournaments
include the Edina Basketball Association and Edina Girls Traveling Basketball Association.
Community Center and South View Gymnasium Traffic Study
City of Edina, MN
0:TR0J1624960Mpt#1- Revised 031605 -Final Draft.doc
03/16W
Page 3
In general, these evening and weekend programs and activities do not adversely impact traffic
volumes on the roadways to degrade the levels of service below a LOS -B. In most cases, the
existing levels of service on these roadways stay at LOS -A (i.e., fewer than 3000 vehicles per
day.)
Existing and Proposed Parking Supply
On- Street Parking
Figure 4 shows the existing on- street parking regulations within the study area. On- street parking
is allowed along the south side of Southview Lane, but not along the north side of the street.
There is room for approximately 33 vehicles to park along the south side of Southview between
Normandale Road and Concord Avenue. Normandale Road, west of Normandale School is
signed for bus parking only Monday through Friday from 8:00 am to 6:00 pm.
Many streets north of the Community Center and South View Middle School have parking
prohibitions, especially during school hours. St. Andrews Avenue, Dalrymple Avenue and
Sherwood Avenue restrict parking on the east side of the streets at all times, but allow parking on
the west side of the streets at times other than 8:00 am to 6:00 pm Mondays through Fridays.
Under peak parking conditions, these streets would each serve 20 to 25 vehicles parked on-
street.
Concord Avenue and streets to the east have no .posted parking prohibitions. There are some
parking prohibitions by Concord Elementary, but those are isolated.
Off - Street Parking
The Community Center building and South View Middle School are currently undergoing
renovation. In addition, three parking lots are also being reconstructed and expanded. Table 1
shows the existing and proposed parking supply for each of the off - street parking lots within the
northern half of the study area. Specifically, the parking supply for each lot is as follows:
TABLE 1
PARKING INFORMATION
Parking Lot
Existina # of Stalls Proposed
# of Stalls
North Lot
88
88
South Lot
181
210 (completed)
East Lot
174 (117 during const.)
218
South View Lot
148
155
Front Lot
10
10
TOTAL 601 (544 during const.) 681
22 drop-off spaces
Source: Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc., and Oslund and Associates, February 25, 2005
Community Center and South View Gymnasium Traffic Study
City of Edina, MN
0APR0J\824960J\Rpt#1- Revised 031805 -Final Draft.doc
03/18/05
Page 4
The drop -off spaces shown in Table 1 are in addition to the designated parking stalls. The 22
proposed drop-off spaces are located in the looped driveway south of the Edina Community
Center and along the south and east curb lines of the East Lot between the Community Center
and South View Middle School.
In addition, Concord School on the southern half of the study area has two parking lots. The east
lot is combined with the student drop -off and pick up area, and is marked with 38 stalls, but may
hold more if the drop -off -space is counted. The west lot at Concord holds 90 vehicles.
Therefore, the entire study area currently has off- street parking capacity for 729 vehicles. Upon
construction of the proposed parking, the study area will have total off - street parking capacity of
809 vehicles, plus 22 drop -off spaces, as shown in Figure 5.
Parking Demand
Daytime Demand
During the school year, daytime traffic patterns around the schools are well established. Parents
are instructed each school year where to pick -up and drop -off students. Buses are relegated to
specific areas of parking lots and streets. School staff members are instructed where they are
allowed to park. Except for bad weather days, this pattern would seem not to change much
during the school year.
Similarly, the daytime parking demand for the Community Center is fairly constant. Customers
tend to park in the lots to the east and south of the Community Center. Current parking is
constrained on the east side of the Community Center because of construction. Parking is
adequate on the south side.
Field reviews of the study area in January and February were conducted to get a "snapshot" of
the average parking usage in the lots. While day - today events and activities may change, the
snapshot inventory of the parking lots was taken to get a feel for the "average" parking demand
within a typical weekday mid - moming. The findings show that most of the lots are nearing
capacity. Table 2 shows the inventory and related percentage to capacity for each lot inventoried.
When the expansion and reconfiguration of the parking lots are complete, the total number of
stalls available in the north project area will be 686 stalls — an increase of 85 stalls. Assuming the
existing demand would remain constant, the parking lot usage would drop to 65.3% during
daytime hours in the school year.
It is important to note that during this field review, of the 33 stalls available for on -street parking
along Southview Lane, only 17 vehicles (or 51.5 %) were in use. In addition there was one vehicle
each parked on Woodland Road and on Concord Terrace east of Concord Avenue, where on-
street parking is unrestricted.
Community Center and South View Gymnasium Traffic Study
City of Edina, MN
0:1PROJ\824960J1Rpt#1- Revised 031805 -Final Draft.doc
03116105
Page 5
TABLE 2
DAYTIME PARKING USAGE
Parking Lot # Stalls Used # Stalls Available % Used
North Lot
72
88
81.8%
South Lot
138
210
65.7%
East Lot *
121 **
117 (will be 218)
103.4% *
South View Lot
109
148 (will be 155)
73.6% *
Front Lot
8
10
80.0%
Total North Project Area
448
573 (will be 681)
78.2%
Concord E Lot
8
38
21.1%
Concord W Lot
87
90
96 7%
Total South Project Area
95
128
74.2%
* Denotes use of existing parking lot, not proposed
** Denotes usage over capacity due to drivers parked in non - designated locations
because of construction
Source: Howard R. Green Company, January 31 and February 7, 2005
Evening Demand
According to officials with the Edina School District and City of Edina Parks & Recreation
Department, there are several activities that are scheduled in these buildings in the evenings.
Many of these activities are listed in the "Historic and Existing Traffic Demand" section of this
memorandum.
The evening parking patterns are far less predictable than the daytime parking patterns for these
buildings. Nevertheless, another field review was taken of the site to assess the parking demand.
This field review occurred mid -week after 7:00 p.m. in February. Table 3 shows the results of the
evening survey.
The survey also noted whether vehicles were parked on street in the neighborhood north of the
Community Center and South View Middle School. There were 13 vehicles parked along
Southview Lane. There were no vehicles parked along the west side of St. Andrews Road,
Dalrymple Road, or Sherwood Avenue. Also, no vehicles were parked on the streets east of
Concord Avenue.
Community Center and South View Gymnasium Traft Study
City of Edina, MN
0APROJ1824960J\Rpt#1- Revised 031605 -Final Draft.doc
03/16/05
Page 6
TABLE 3
EVENING PARKING USAGE
Parking Lot # Stalls Used # Stalls Available % Used
North Lot
39
88
44.3%
South Lot
33
210
15.7%
East Lot *
50
117 (will be 218)
42.7% *
South View Lot
5
148 (will be 155)
3.4% *
Front Lot
7
10
70.0%
Total North Project Area
134
573 (will be 681)
23.4%
Concord E Lot
2
38
5.3%
Concord W Lot
0
90
0.0%
Total South Project Area
2
129
1.6%
* Denotes use of existing parking lot, not proposed
Source: Howard R. Green Company, February 9, 2005
Weekend Tournament Demand
As with the evening activities, the Edina School District and City of Edina Parks & Recreation
Department have stated that there are several activities that are scheduled in these buildings on
the weekends. Many of these activities are listed in the "Historic and Existing Traffic Demand"
section of this memorandum.
Aside from the programs and activities scheduled for the Edina Community Center, there are
occasional athletic tournaments scheduled for the gymnasiums. For example, on the weekend of
February 4 through 6, as many as 124 teams from 28 communities participated in the Edina
Classic at these gyms and hosted by Edina Girls Traveling Basketball Association. As a result,
participants, coaches and parents came and went throughout the days and evenings.
To assess weekend demand, parking usage was surveyed on the weekend of February 4 through
6. Table 4 shows the results of the evening survey.
The survey also noted vehicles parked on street in the neighborhood north of the Community
Center and South View Middle School. There were 23 vehicles parked along the south side of
Southview Lane. There were 16 vehicles parked along the west side of St. Andrews, no vehicles
parked along the west side of Dalrymple, and one vehicle parked along the west side of
Sherwood Avenue. In comparison, no vehicles were parked on the streets east of Concord
Avenue.
Community Center and South View Gymnasium Traft Study
City of Edina, MN
0:1PROJ1824960J\Rpt#1- Revised 031605 -Final Draft.doc
03/16105
Page 7
TABLE 4
WEEKEND PARKING USAGE
Parking Lot # Stalls Used # Stalls Available % Used
North Lot
5
88
5.7 %
South Lot
14
210
6.7%
East Lot *
98
117 (will be 218)
83.8% *
South View Lot
58
148 (will be 155)
39.2% *
Front Lot
0
10
0.0%
Total North Project Area
175
573 (will be 681)
30.5%
Concord E Lot
1
38
2.6%
Concord W Lot
3
90
3.3%
Total South Project Area
4
128
3.1%
* Denotes use of existing parking lot, not proposed
Source: Howard R. Green Company, February 4 -6, 2005
(This analysis does not include the impacts of parking and traffic generated by athletic activities
at Kuhlman Field. It is assumed that those football games and other activities, because of their
nature, create overflow conditions for traffic and parking throughout all streets and parking lots in
the study area. It is also assumed that the City and School District have formulated special traffic
control scenarios to cope with these events and activities, which is outside the scope of this
analysis.)
Parking Analysis
Review of these "snapshots" of parking usage shows that parking demand is most critical during
weekdays while school is in session, and while daytime activities are occurring at the Community
Center. Given the current configuration of the parking lots, the north half of the study area used
nearly 80% of the existing parking capacity during weekdays while school is in session. Upon the
completion of the parking expansions and reconfigurations, the current demand would drop to
65% of proposed capacity.
Similarly, the evening and weekend demands for the north half of the study area was
approximately 23% and 30 %, respectively of the existing parking capacity. Upon completion of
the parking expansions and reconfigurations, the current evening and weekend parking lot
demand would drop to approximately 20% and 26 %, respectively.
On street parking was most critical during the weekend review period, where vehicles were
parked along Southview Lane and along some of the streets north of South View Middle School.
At no time during this review, however, were parked vehicles recorded over the capacity of the
available on -street parking. St. Andrews Avenue recorded this highest incidence of on- street
parking, with 64% of the available on- street parking used.
Community Center and South View Gymnasium Traffic Study
City of Edina, MN
0APR0J\824960J\Rpt#1- Rev1sed 031605 -Final Draft.doc
0306/05
Page 8
During this analysis, parking demand for the southern part of the study area was most critical
during weekdays. The West Concord Lot was nearing capacity at 97% occupied. The East
Concord Lot, however, had available space for student pick -up and drop -off.
Traffic and Parking Demand from Additional Gymnasiums
It has been proposed to add two additional gymnasiums to the current campus renovation that is
underway (see Figure 1). These two gymnasiums will add recreation opportunities to each site.
In addition, these will add traffic to the adjacent street system, and will also add parking and pick-
up /drop -off demand to the area.
According to Ed MacHolda, Edina's Assistant Parks and Recreation Director, these gymnasiums
are to be considered "multi- purpose ". When completed, each gym will house athletic and general
activities. Neither gym will have "traditional" bleachers for spectators, but will have a viewing
capacity of approximately 75 to 100 people. Therefore, each gym will be used primarily for
participant -only activities (such as youth or adult basketball and volleyball) or Community Center
programs or activities.
To account for future traffic and parking demand created by these gyms, typical traffic scenarios
must be developed.
Daytime Scenario Assumptions
:• South View Middle School uses new gym for school activities. Therefore, no
additional traffic or parking demand projected during school hours.
❖ Community Center uses new gym for multi - purpose activities. Therefore,
assume four ninety- minute sessions during the day. Assume 40 people per
session = 4 x 40 =160 people throughout day; therefore assume 160 inbound
trips and 160 outbound trips = 320 total additional trips.
Up to 40 additional parking stalls required per session.
Evening Scenario Assumptions
❖ Two simultaneous practices /games per gym = 40 participants, 4 coaches, 8
spectators (many sharing trips) = 30 inbound trips and 30 outbound trips per gym
= 60 total additional trips;
❖ Two sessions per evening (6:30 to 9:30 p.m.)= 120 additional trips per evening
❖ Up to 30 additional parking stalls per gym required, but assume twice that many.
(Up to 60 spaces needed to accommodate change over between sessions, as
participants from early shift leave and participants of later shift arrive. In reality,
pick -up /drop -off areas may accommodate some of these participants, but not
assumed in this worst -case scenario.)
Community Center and South View Gymnasium Traffic Study
City of Edina, MN
0APROJ1824960JU2pt#1- Rev1sed 031805 -Final Dmft.doc
03/l/05
Page 9
Weekend Toumament Scenario Assumvtions
❖ Between four and ten seventy- minute sessions during the day. Assume 25
people per session (some travel together) = 20 trips inbound and 20 trips
outbound = 40 trips per session.
❖ Four sessions on Friday night for each new gym = 4 x 40 trips x 2 gyms = 320
additional trips.
❖ Eight sessions on Saturday for each gym = 8 x 40 trips x 2 gyms = 640 additional
trips.
❖ Six sessions on Sunday for each gym = 6 x 40 trips x 2 gyms = 480 additional
trips.
❖ Twenty additional parking stalls required per session. Also, assume that there is
turnover in the parking (i.e., all vehicles are not present throughout the day, but
will arrive just before and will leave just after each session).
The traffic volumes shown on Figures 2C reflect the most current weekday traffic volumes
recorded by the City throughout the study area. The new gyms may add up to 440 vehicles per
day (320 daytime and 120 evening trips) into the weekday traffic volumes. This traffic will be
dispersed along the streets in the north half of the study area, especially along the neighborhood
collectors of Southview Lane, Concord Avenue, Normandale Road, and West 5e Street. Figure
6A shows the estimated distribution of the additional weekday trips on the street network.
Tournament weekend traffic would also impact the existing weekend traffic volumes in the study
area. Figure 2D shows the historical and most current weekend traffic volumes recorded by the
City. Typically weekend traffic in residential areas is less than weekday traffic volumes. Figure
6B illustrates the estimated distribution of the additional tournament weekend trips on the street
network.
There was no historical weekend traffic count data along Southview Lane in this area. However,
an average of other weekend volumes versus weekday volumes for streets in the area yields the
following ratios — Saturday traffic averages 61.7% of weekday traffic, and Sunday traffic averages
54.6% of weekday traffic. Therefore, Southview Lane traffic can be assumed from these ratios to
be 2,267 vehicles per Saturday, and 2,007 per Sunday. (Note: No traffic counts were recorded
along Normandale Road between the MN 100 on -ramp and Southview Lane.)
Table 5 illustrates the effect of the traffic added to the system by the gymnasiums. The trips
distributed throughout the system in Figures 6A and 6B have been added to the most current daily
traffic volumes. As a result, levels of service are calculated for these ADTs by using Figure 3.
Overall, tournament Fridays will experience the highest traffic volumes of any time period. Not
only will those days experience the weekday traffic use to and from the gyms, but they will also
experience the evening tournament use, which draws more traffic than the typical evening uses.
Nevertheless, the level of service on Tournament Fridays will remain at LOS -B or better on these
facilities.
Community Center and South View Gymnasium Traffic Study
City of Edina, MN
0:1PROJ\824960J\Rpt#1- Revised 031605 -Final Draft.doc
03/16105
page 10
TABLE 5
ESTIMATED TRAFFIC AND LEVEL OF SERVICE COMPARISON
Location
Weekday (including
Tournament Friday
Tournament
Tournament
Evening)
Evening*
Saturday-
Sunda
Concord Ave. south
1,303/1,333
1,333/1,361
804/860
711/753
of58h St. W.
A/A
A/A
A/A
A/A
58 St. W east of
1,392 /1,530
1,530/ 1,632
859/1,063
760/913
Concord Ave.
A/A
A/A
A/A
A/A
Concord Ave. south
2,639/ 2,787
2,787 / 2,877
1,628 /1,808
1,441 /1,576
of Woodland Rd.
A/A
A/A
A/A
A/A
Southview Lane
3,675 / 3,823
3,823/ 3,913
2,267 / 2,447
2,007 / 2,142
west of concord Ave
B/ B
B/ B
A/A
A/A
Southview Lane east
3,675/ 3,825
3,825/ 3,955
2,267 / 2,527
2,007 / 2,202
of Normandale Rd.
B/ B
B/ B
A/A
A/A
Note: Blue Numbers denote most current average daily traffic (ADT) volume
Red Numbers indicate ADTs plus new gymnasium traffic.
'denotes Friday tournament traffic added to weekday traffic WITH the new gymnasiums operational
*denotes estimated Saturday traffic using ratio
"'denotes estimated Sunday traffic using ratio
Source: Howard R. Green Company, 2005
Traffic will also increase on Normandale Road, as seen in figures 6A and 6B. Unfortunately, the
lack of traffic counts along that facility has precluded the ability to assess levels of service during
the weekday and tournament weekend periods. However, an estimate of level of service based
on engineering judgment for the weekday and tournament weekend periods would place the
facility at LOS -B or better.
Regarding parking demand, the proposed parking supply will be adequate to serve the additional
demand generated by the new gyms. Users of the new Community Center gym will use the
South Lot more frequently, where there is available capacity. The East Lot is being expanded,
thus benefiting users of both the Community Center and South View Middle School. The South
View Lot is being reconfigured, and will provide additional stalls.
The most critical time period for the parking supply will be during the overlap of people arriving
and departing between sessions. At these times, the parking supply will (at worst case) need to
be twice the anticipated number of vehicles. In reality, pick -up /drop -off areas may accommodate
many of these trips. Furthermore, on tournament weekends, participants will be scheduled for
games at various times throughout the weekend, so not all participants will need to be at the gyms
at once.
Safety
During this analysis, the morning school arrival period at South View Middle School was
monitored. Traffic volumes along Southview Lane began building after 7:15 a.m. and continued
until the start of classes at 7:45 a.m. Traffic was a mix of parents dropping kids off at the school
and those drivers heading to work. Those parents dropping kids off at school would approach the
western driveway at South View and turn into the drop off area where a patrol guard motioned the
Community Center and South View Gymnasium Traffic Study
City of Edina, MN
0:1PR0J\824960J\Rpt#1- Revised 031605 -Final Draft.doc
03/166
Page 11
vehicles forward. There was storage for approximately twelve vehicles in the drop off area. The
parents would drop off their kids, and then exit back onto Southview Lane at the east driveway.
As the time approached 7:30 a.m., traffic peaked and it became more challenging for parents to
find adequate gaps in the traffic stream. At times, some vehicles turned onto side streets to drop
off students, thus creating a safety issue with these students crossing Southview between the
vehicles that were queued to use the drop off area in front of school.
Meanwhile, some westbound drivers not in queue for the school drop -off were seen passing on
the right in order to get to Normandale Road. These drivers created a de facto through lane along
the curb in order to get past the school related traffic.
It appears that many of these safety issues have been addressed within the expansion and
reconfiguration of South View Middle School. The official drop off area will be relocated to the
west side of the new addition. This will allow significantly more traffic to use the east and south
curb lines of the parking lot between the school and the Community Center. As a result, drop off
traffic will be pulled off of Southview Lane during school arrival times, thus providing a much safer
condition along the street. In addition, through traffic will be less likely to pass long queues on the
right to get to Normandale Road. In all, a safer condition will result.
Summary
Analysis of the traffic and parking patterns of the Edina Community Center and South View Middle
School study area have yielded the following findings:
❖ The traffic volumes in the study area have fluctuated through the years, but are
generally trending upward.
❖ The existing levels of service on the street system in the study area are generally at
LOS-13 or better. School days and tournament Fridays yield peak traffic volume and
parking usage periods.
❖ An equitable balance of on- street parking regulations has evolved in the neighborhood
in the.north half of the study area. Compliance appears to be high. Parking
regulations are not posted, nor do they appear to be needed, in the neighborhood to
the east of Concord Avenue.
❖ The Community Center and South View Middle School parking lots are currently at an
78% usage rate during the school day; 23% during the evenings and 31% on
toumament weekends. Expansion and reconfiguration of the parking lots will increase
parking capacity at the site, and may result in some shifting of parking preference by
users.
On- street parking is common along the south side of Southview Lane during daytime,
evening and, tournament weekend periods. In evenings and on weekends, on- street
parking becomes common along the west side of St. Andrews Avenue, but at no point
in the review did on- street parking demand meet or exceed capacity. No other street
Community Center and South View Gymnasium Traffic Study
City of Edina, MN
0APR0J\824960J\Rpt#1- Revised 031605 -Final Draft.doc
03/1&05
Page 12
in the neighborhood experiences the same level of on- street parking frequency, as
does St. Andrews.
Levels of service on the streets in the study area will not degrade appreciably as a
result of the addition of the two new gymnasiums. The distribution of the added trips
indicates that the roadways in the study area will remain at the same levels of service
as before the completion of the new gyms. This was true for weekday and
tournament weekend scenarios.
Conclusion
The goal of this study has been to determine whether the proposed gymnasiums will adversely
impact the traffic and parking in the area. The levels of service on the streets within the study
area will not degrade appreciably as a result of the addition of the two new gymnasiums. Upon
completion of the proposed parking lot changes, the on- street and off - street parking supply will
adequately serve the daytime, evening and tournament weekend demands.
Community Center and South View Gymnasium Traffic Study
City of Edina, MN
OAPROJ1824960J\Rpt#1- Revised 031605 -Final Draft.doc
03/1&05
Page 13
References:
1. Land Use Plan Map, City of Edina Transportation Plan, City of Edina, MN, March
1999.
2. Existing Traffic Volumes Map, City of Edina Transportation Plan, City of Edina,
MN, March 1999.
3. Forecast 2020 Daily Traffic Volumes Map, City of Edina Transportation Plan, City
of Edina, MN, March 1999.
4. Functional Classification Map, City of Edina Transportation Plan, City of Edina,
MN, March 1999.
5. Pedestrian /Bicycle Facilities Map, City of Edina Transportation Plan, City of
Edina, MN, March 1999.
6. Traffic Analysis Zones Map, City of Edina Transportation Plan, City of Edina, MN,
March 1999.
7. Parking Restrictions Map, data accumulated by City of Edina, MN, February
2005.
8. Historical Traffic Volumes, 1975 -2004, data accumulated by City of Edina, MN,
February 2005.
9. ECC /Normandale Elementary School Gym Addition Floor Plan, Rozeboom - Miller
Architects, February 2005.
10. South View Middle School Gymnasium Addition Floor Plan, Rozeboom - Miller
Architects, February 2005.
11. Edina Community Center /South View Middle School Site Plan, Rozeboom - Miller
Architects, February 2005.
12. Phone conversations with Doug Johnson, Edina School District, 01/31/05 and
02/02/05.
13. Phone conversation with Ed MacHolda, Edina Assistant Parks & Recreation
Director, 02/01/05.
14. City of Edina Local Traffic Task Force Findings and Recommendations, May 6,
2003
15. 2005 Edina Park & Recreation Insider, City of Edina, 2005.
16. Edina Basketball Association website, www.edinabasketball.com
17. Edina Girls Athletic Association website, www.egaa.org
18. Girls Traveling Basketball website, www.edinaciidsbasketball.org
19. Edina School District website, www.edina.kl2.mn.us
20. City of Edina website, www.ci.edina.mn.us
21. "Campus Traffic and Parking" HRG Memo to Jay Willemssen, Edina Public
Schools, from Howard Preston, PE, and Chris Albrecht, July 31, 2000.
22. 2003 Official City Map of City of Edina
23. Field checks of study area, Howard R. Green Company, 01/31/05; 02/05/05;
02/06/05; 02/09/05; 03/03/05.
Community Center and South View Gymnasium Traffic Study
City of Edina, MN
O:XPROJ\824980J\Rpt#1- Revised 031805 -Final Draft.doc
03/16/05
Page 14
Figures
1. Study Area
2A. Weekday 24 -Hour Traffic Volumes (1975 -1984)
2B. Weekday 24 -Hour Traffic Volumes (1985 -1994)
2C. Weekday 24 -Hour Traffic Volumes (1955 -2004)
2D. Weekend 24 -Hour Traffic Volumes
3. General Roadway Levels of Service
4. Parking Restrictions
5. Proposed Parking Lot Availability
6A. Estimated Additional Weekday Traffic
6B. Estimated Additional Traffic on Tournament Weekends
Community Center and South View Gymnasium Traffic Study
City of Edina, MN
0:\PROJ \824960J\Rpt#1- Revised 031605 -Final Draft.doc
03/1 &05
Page 15
A
IV
• ,
r .-
xJke •�
—} > 4 .
7 1 6
te..• -�,' .'..
M�
�„d6
y
�:.�
^%t
A
r.,
4r1
low.
•b
- 'h'�.
°yam ^F°� y
a
L U
t .�
�•
SSii
�' s�
+ey y7 I� > .._1
`
P
_
` li �{ S • .ice"'
7�
%'4
^ .•� t'�.1 ,,;,y ` �� ; -
i•
ITt
A.
t ice°'
'fit
00` 4�a,� f +.•'
is.. � �"�'.�
) A
- •a•. a' 1. �
i'°
��
`.
�a4
a':
' y
% . 1 �P r 1►
- - —
' �
1. 4V �
.•.� - 'rte: ",
-
`
PIN
,
1985- 1361
t
Pik
1987- 1971
•
1989- 1979
1991 - 2378
1
1• . _ p
a; .
s s ;'` .il�_
'►:r �L�`n ,
�
� •
-.;alb
��
3��. '� a
� t
1
� , _ i
F
'"+yr f
1985 - 1150
S
1987 - 520
a is
-
1987 - 5468
,yam •� ■.
-733
y
�1991
Legend
Cirr
1984-1234 Year -ADT Volume Number
•-r
Source: of
I Minnesota
. x
WEEKDAY 24 -HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES (1985 -1994) FIGURE
P F- ard R. Green Company TRAFFIC STUDY
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA 2B
45,000
acity Assumptions: �'�
Los
fThrough Only Lane 800 vph
Note: This figure contains
40,000
TH Lane 600 vph
RT Lane 700 vph
approximate values. The
values are highly dependant
LOSE
TH/RT /LT Lanes 600 vph
on the assumptions used. It
Turn Lanes 350 vph
should not be used for
operational analyses or final
\\ \\\\\\\\\
35,000
Peak Hour Percentages i2i design.
Arterial Roadway 10%
\\\\\\\\\\\
Directional Orientation 60/40
Los F
LOS D.
30,000
(1) Assumes 1/4 mile signal spacing. For
:' :' . • :'
less than 1/4 mile signal spacing, roadway LOSE' '
becomes too volatile to determine LOS by
\\\\\\.....
GADT.
Q
� %
25,000
20,000
For greater than 1/4 mile signal
spacing, the capacity for a through lane can
be increased by approximately 50-100
vplph..
(2) Based on data provided in the Mn/DOT
1998 Automatic Traffic Recorder (ATR)
LOS F
.•LOSE ...
LOS
•'
LOS
\\. .\
\\\ :°. S .\
�' Los c
'(d
®
W LOS
Los , >,
LOS . \\
a'. Los ,'.
/, /• /• / /, /•
d
tai
LOS F
LOSE
\\\\\\\\\\\
w...... \\\
, >,•,•,•�',
,iiiniiiii
LOS B
Qi
'
15,000
.:
\\\\\\\\\\\
•
,,a • > <s
,a,a,•,,,>,
I //III // //,
LOS
-
.\...... \\
\\\ Los .,
\, \..,,. \,\
..,.,,, \,.\
.. > > > >
.... a
•, >, >,•, >,>
. , • > •
.. a . . .
,.,.,.,.,.,
,,, LOS B •/
,,,,,,,,,,,
LOS F \\\\\\\\\\\
• > . . .
10,000
>,', >, > < ><
LOSE a Los C :'< ,.
.......
a ,,s
>,> LOS �>
>�sa•�> <>a
I.../i„/
/i LOS
...... ,fd
BI //
-
5,000
`e LOS C a ` ,�. LOS B ,i
......... /.
'a a a > ><
,i. LOS B
LOS A::::
:} LOS A:
ell. Los B ............
' ./ - - - :: p : LOS A.':'
:• }: LOS A � � . � • }:� LOS A :; ...........
............
...........
...........
LAS A
0
2 -Lane Undivided w/o 2 -Lane Undivided with R 3 -Lane Undivided with L 3 -Lane Undivided with R
4 -Lane Undivided w/o
4 -Lane Undivided with R 4 -Lane
Divided with R &
Turn Lanes or L Turn Lanes
Turn Lane
& L Turn Lanes
Turn Lanes
or L Turn Lanes L
Turn Lanes
Type of Roadway.
GENERAL
ROADWAY.LEVELS
OF SERVICE
FIGURE
P�
R, Green Company
RAFFIC STUDY
3
y
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
Howard R. Green CorrPany
MEMO
To: Craig Larsen; Wayne Houle, PE; Steve Lillehaug, PE, PTOE
From: Steve Manhart, PE, PTOE
Subject: ADDENDUM #1 — Community Center and South View Gymnasium Traffic
Study
Date: March 29, 2005
On Wednesday, March 24, 2005, 1 presented the findings of this traffic study to the Edina
Transportation Commission. This traffic study focused on the traffic impacts associated with
activities and events at the two new gymnasiums proposed in the Community Center and South
View Middle School campus. Following my presentation, the Commission raised several
questions regarding the impacts of the overall redevelopment of the campus on the traffic
conditions in the surrounding area.
Based on these questions, additional information has been gathered regarding the overall
redevelopment for the site, and the resultant impacts this development will have on traffic. Mr.
Ted Rozeboom of Rozeboom - Miller Architects, Inc., project architect for the campus
redevelopment, has provided information regarding elements of the project expansion:
Community Center and Normandale School Expansion:
• A total of 1,800 square feet are being added to the building.
• The lobby for Normandale School is being expanded on the south end of the building.
• No classrooms are being added, and the school's capacity will not be increased.
• A reduction and reconfiguration in seating is proposed in the Art and Music Room from
900 fixed seats to 500 fixed seats.
South View Middle School Expansion:
• The expansion is not adding capacity to the school, but is modifying the spaces in the
school. (The number of classrooms and student population are not anticipated to
change significantly in the future.)
• There is an increase in seating capacity in the theater from 400 to 600.
• The existing lower gymnasium is being modified. The existing bleachers (seating
capacity 900) are being removed, as are the temporary seating areas (seating capacity
250). The lower gym will remain an auxiliary gym with no seating.
• The existing upper gym is being converted to a music rehearsal suite, which better
accommodates the existing programs and uses for this space.
• A new gymnasium planned for the field house expansion will seat 1,036, which is less
than the seating lost from the existing lower gym (900 bleacher seats + 250 temporary
seats =1,150 seats).
• The existing pool has no fixed seating, but does have temporary seating in place for
swim meets. This pool area is being transformed into additional music rehearsal area.
• A new pool and diving well is being added to the field house area. There will be new
seating for 365.
ADDENDUM #1 03/29/05
Community Center and South View Gymnasium Traffic Study page 2
The modifications proposed for the Community Center and South View campus area are not the
result of increases in numbers of students — the enrollments at South View and Normandale
schools are expected to remain steady. These modifications represent a general reorganization
of existing uses and overall increases in space, not seating capacity, for various activities. In fact,
a review of the combined seating capacities in the Community Center and South View campus
before and after the redevelopment shows a slight overall decline in seating capacity for the uses
listed above. The existing seating capacity for these combined uses has been 2,560 seats
(including temporary seats). The projected seating of these combined uses after redevelopment
is 2,501 seats.
Therefore, these aforementioned uses will present a minimal change in traffic impacts to the
Community Center and South View Middle School campus area. The same numbers of students
will be using the increased spaces. The changes in the Community Center and Normandale
School do not produce or attract additional trips.
As a result, the two new gymnasiums discussed in the original report become the more decisive
trip generators for the study area. It will be the activities scheduled for these two new gyms that
will create increased traffic to and from the campus, not the elements of the redevelopment listed
above. Therefore, the investigation and findings presented in the original report reflect the more
critical impacts to traffic to streets in the study area.
It may be argued that the campus redevelopment listed above will intensify the traffic if events and
activities in the theater or pool areas are scheduled simultaneously with activities in the new
gyms. In an earlier conversation with Doug Johnson of the Edina School District, it was
acknowledged that the scheduling of simultaneous events would put pressure on parking in the
area. Mr. Johnson stated that the school district will be mindful of previously scheduled events in
the gymnasiums, and would avoid scheduling simultaneous events in the theater or pool areas.
In summary, the critical traffic generators for the site will be the two new gymnasiums and not the
redevelopment of the other areas in the campus. The Community Center and Normandale
School expansion will not increase the number of classrooms, nor will it increase activity areas.
The South View Middle School expansion will redistribute activity space within the school, but will
not reflect increases in numbers of students. The overlap of events will generally not occur as
indicated by the school district. Therefore, the analysis and findings of the original report present
the most critical impacts to the surrounding street system.
G:XEngineering% Infrastructure\Streets%Trafflc\STUDIES\School Studies\2005 Southview Community Ctr Gym Traffic Analysis\3 -29-
05—Addendum—Traffic Study.doc
1' 11
`,91A , MINUTES OF THE
Edina Transportation Commission
ow e co Thursday, March 24, 2005
�J �y Edina City Hall
4801 West 50th Street
� 8Sao Community Room
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Fred Richards, Marie Thorpe, Jean White, Warren Plante, Joni Kelly Bennett, Dean Dovolis
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Les Wanninger
STAFF PRESENT:
Steve Lillehaug, Sharon Allison
b. Community Center & South View Gvmnasium Traffic Study — Howard R. Green
Company
Steve Manhart with Howard R. Green Company said they were commissioned to conduct a traffic
study to identify internal and off -site traffic and parking impacts and to determine whether the
proposed gymnasiums will adversely impact traffic and parking in the area of the Community Center
and South View Middle School. The study area is bounded by W. 60th St. to the north, Lakeview
Drive to the south, TH 100 to the east and Wooddale Avenue to the west. In addition to the
gymnasiums, there will be building expansion on South View Middle School and the Edina
Community Center, as well as the east and west parking lot and reconfiguration of South View's
parking lot.
Manhart said they used historical traffic count data dating back to 1975 as well as more current
counts (1995- 2004), provided to them by the Engineering Department. Through data analysis and
observation of the area, the study identified the following:
• Local streets have high access but low mobility; principal arterials have low access but high
mobility;
• Traffic on roadways free flows at Level of Service (LOS) A (LOS -D or better is generally
acceptable in the Twin Cities);
• Relocation of South View's students drop -off location will pull more vehicles off Southview
Lane;
Projected Traffic and Parkinq Demand
• Daytime Scenario: No additional trip generation /parking for school's gym; 320 additional
trips and 40 parking stalls required for the Community Center's gym (assuming 4 ninety -
minute sessions and 40 people per session daily for multi - purpose activities);
Evening Scenario: 120 trips created by two simultaneous practices /games per gym
(assuming 40 participants, 4 coaches and 8 spectators); 30 additional parking stalls per
gym, but up to 60 spaces to accommodate change over between sessions;
• Tournament Weekend Scenario: Four sessions on Friday night per gym ( =4x40 trips x 2
gyms) equals 320 additional trips; eight sessions on Saturday per gym ( =8x40 trips x 2
gyms) equals 640 additional trips; six sessions on Sunday per gym ( =6x40 trips x 2 gyms)
equals 480 additional trips.
• On- street parking restrictions seem to be in compliance; most parking are on Southview
Lane and side streets during weekend tournaments, especially St. Andrews;
• Weekend tournament traffic travels primarily along collector streets ( Southview Lane,
Concord Ave. and Normandale Rd.);
In conclusion, the study found that "Levels of Service will not degrade appreciably as a result of the
construction of the new gymnasiums and upon completion of the proposed parking lot changes, on-
street and off - street parking supply will adequately serve weekday, evening and tournament weekend
demands."
Richards indicated that the school should provide adequate off - street parking since they are
continuing to intensify usage of the area. Plante concurred and stated that the traffic issue should
have been addressed ahead of time and not after - the -fact. Dovolis said usage of the area would
intensify even more when new programs are added and even if they were to provide adequate off-
street parking, the number of trips generated will be an issue. Bennett said the number of vehicles is
unacceptable for a residential area and there has been a lack of communication with the residents.
White suggested creating an alternative transportation system to reduce the number of trips. Thorpe
asked what could they do at this point considering that everything appears to be in place and
construction has already begun. Lillehaug said funding for the gyms is yet to be approved.
Residents in attendance commented as follow:
Julie Risser, 6112 Ashcroft Ave. Risser stated that Valley View Rd should have been included in the
study because it is used heavily when events are over and while the. study addressed traffic on
Normandale Rd, it did not address the excess traffic that Valley View Rd will carry. She said Valley
View Rd is a 1.1 miles speedway road with one only one place for drivers to stop between
Normandale Rd and Hwy 62. She said the only designated crosswalk for students at Concord and
Valley View Rd is dangerous because the flasher is on constantly and is therefore ignored by drivers.
She said there is also a 'dip' in the road just before the crosswalk that makes it difficult for drivers to
see an adult crossing, let alone children. She said the sidewalk does not go all the way through and
students must be bused 2.5 blocks from Concord Elementary because Valley View Rd is too
dangerous to cross. She is also not happy with the increased traffic in the area.
Ron Wenaas, 5617 Sherwood Ave. Wenaas stated that he is disappointed that the traffic study only
considered the impact of two gyms and not all four that are planned. He said the operating hours
used in the study is not correct, it should be from 4 -10:30 p.m. which then doubles the traffic study's
assumptions. He said the numbers used to determine trip generations are low and needs to be
reconsidered. He stated that the traffic study should have been done based on what the project is
going to do to the entire community, not just the effects of two gyms. He said the Edina Community
Neighborhood Association implores the ETC to not recommend that they go forward with the gyms.
Ralph Overholt, 6321 Rolf Ave. Overholt asked how has the Level of Service changed specifically
and are there areas that are more affected than others? He said based on the cost per parking stall,
the School Board should get students to bike or use other alternatives.
Bennett stated that the Commission does not have an accurate picture of the impact on the
community considering that all four gyms were not included in the traffic study. Dovolis concurred,
stating that the study does not address all the uses, capacities, functions and future uses. Bennett
said the study should not advance until all this information is known. Plante said Valley View Rd
should be included in the future study.
Dovolis made a motion encouraging a new traff
community, including future potential of sites and
the community is known. Seconded by Plante.
Ayes: 6
Nayes: 0
Motion carried.
study that will look at the impact on the entire
withhold approval of gyms until the full impact on
wpm 1 ���pp�p1 3
i V WLN-
vA
r
e v.
r
� 1 �
i
t
Proposed
Gym Site .k 3-,
a �y
tie�e'`
�r j00 ,� C
2�� -
o
Darlene Wallin
Jennifer Bennerotte
-rom: Wednesday, April 13, 200511:59 AM
Sent: Darlene Hughes; John Keprios Center and Southview
To: Gordon Hug
Cc: FW : Gymnasiums for Community
Subject:
-__- original Message'- rlang
Langs sev�mulliganb]ornnes.com]
ev [mai13, 2005 11:58 AM
From Ryan April 13,
sent: Bennerotte nit
Center and Southview
To: Jennifer
Subject: Fwd: Gymnasiums for COMM Commu
Would you
Councilmember Scot Houscdon't have
Jennifer: between myself and Councilmembers (I It would be
communication rios and ou Gordon Hughes.
is an email this communication to the other
Below as to forward to Mr. John Kep
be so kind as well as
their email addresses)
much appreciated.
Ryan E• Langsev
5801 Concord Avenue
Edina, MN 55424
E. Langsev PLLP
Ryan Bornnes
Mulligan & '� Avenue
401 Groveland 55403
Minneapolis, MV
879 -1819 05 lo:40AM »>
(612) com> 04/13/ at the community
<scot•houstu�willir the gymnasiums at the
Roush regarding were misleading make
>>> Scot H for your comments. if my comments and Maria to
Ryan - Thanks with Dan
center and southvie9 and I have communicated
council meeting comments were based.
last sure they know on what my issue and wish I could be ateat a
s about this I will be in Philadelphia
I appreciate your feeling unfortunately,
Tuesday evening- ed. These conflicts occur
can not be Chang time to time.
meeting on which do happen from
business meeting a but tl�Y with
infrequently for m of the community
infrequ which we
we try to balance the needs make decisions
at council a tryborhoods. We need
In our role today and for the future.
the needs of individual
a:f Edina We take
feel best serve issue, please knouttistvalued and
not see eye '" eye on every Your inP
we may to us very seriously* final decision is
While You send before a
the
communication been a� will be considered 9. your comments My number
reached. be of further assisheccouncil have
please feel free
to call
if I can ers of
I will cake sure the other memb
is 763 - 302 -7174• well.
your communication as
Thanks,
Scot
1
"Ryan Langsev ".
<rlangsev@mulliganbj
ornnes.com>
04/13/2005 10:19 AM
Community Center Neighborhood.
CDT
Councilmember. Housch:
To: Scot Housh /Min /US /WCGUWCG
CC:. .
bcc:
Subject: Sports Complex Plan for Edina
It is difficult to fully express in this email my disappointment with the
Edina City Council in its proposed plans to build the City -and School
District sponsored gymnasiums ( "Sports Complex ") on the Edina Community
Center campus in our neighborhood.
The Sports. Complex plans has the obvious problems with putting too much
into one location in a'single family residential neighborhood. But it was
tentatively approved on December 7,. 2004 without a traffic study in this
time when traffic is arguably the primary concern of city voters.. The
study produced is.fatally flawed with many significant problems including,
but not limited to: incorrect useage assumptions, applies street
degradation standards to our neighborhood quality of life standards, and is
blatantly. bias (acknowledges. your. previous vote, among other reasons) to
such a high degree in which it has no objectivity from which to use in
basing a decision.
Moreover, the Council's actions suggest an insensitivity to the ECC
neighborhood. The Council appears interested with.traffic problems voiced
by the residents of the Country Club and Morningside neighborhoods
regarding increased temporaryy cut - through traffic due to the delay in
widening Hwy 100 between 36th and 394,. or the potential for greater traffic
in a commercial area in the 44th Street and France Avenue area. Yet, you
intentionally direct on a permanent ongoing basis a high - volume of traffic
into our single family residential neighborhood without a traffic study.
into an area that has no isolated ingress and egress.point during the times
when we have a temporary reprieve from our high volume of. vehicle traffic.
This plan is nearly unconscionable.
To make matters worse,. your. closing comments.during the April 5, 2005
council meeting that the neighborhood supports the Sports Complex plans
only highlights your.lack of constituency work and appreciation of the
sentiments of the residents in the ECC neighborhood. In addition,. your
specific references to Dan Rectenwald (who has always strongly opposed the
Sports Complex plans at ECC) implicitly as a supporter of the plans was
clearly misleading, if not a misrepresentation on the record to the Council
body.
One thing you can be sure of:. residents will voice their disapproval of
the Sports.Complex plans, whether you attend the April 19, 2005 hearing or
not. I hope you change your plans and attend. I have much more to say
than is contained in this email. I don't consider it being "unEdinan" if I
object to plans that greatly diminish the quality of life for my family.
Ryan Langsev
5801 Concord Avenue
0
Edina, MN 55424
Ryan E. Langsev
Mulligan & Bjornnes PLLP
401 Groveland Avenue
.nnea olis, MN 55403
� lZ� -71 Z
t
DF �v e L
D No�
g �N� 4B Eg
&A
�Z A° �f
cn
1 0
w,
'5
EDINA COMMUNITY CENTER
SOUTH VIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL
Gymnasium Additions
Edina, Minnesota
SCHEMATIC DESIGN REPORT
16 March 2005
ROZEBOOM MILLER ARCHITECTS
Minneapolis, Minnesota
TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2
DESIGN PROCESS /ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 3
SCHEMATIC DESIGN NARRATIVE
SITE DESIGN 4
BUILDING DESIGN g
BUILDING PROGRAM 7
BUILDING SYSTEMS
EXTERIOR CONSTRUCTION
8
INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION
g
STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS
10
SVMS GYM STRUCTURAL
11
ECC GYM STRUCTURAL
12
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS
15
SVMS GYM MECHANICAL
15
ECC GYM MECHANICAL
20
ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS
24
SVMS GYM ELECTRICAL
24
ECC GYM ELECTRICAL
28
STATEMENT OF PROBABLE COST 31
SCHEMATIC DESIGN DRAWINGS 43
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc. Page 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Overview
The City of Edina Gymnasium project includes both the Edina Community Center (ECC) and
South View Middle School (SVMS) Gymnasium additions. The building design is the result of
creating clear identities at two different scales —that of the campus scale and the scale of the
individual buildings themselves.
From a campus -wide perspective, the design of both additions incorporates similar elements
and strategies for organization, thus tying the two together: Distinct entries with similar
landscape treatments, public plazas, and their pedestrian connections serve to create a campus
feel to tie the site together. The hardscape plazas with standalone gateway canopies mark the
entries of each addition; similar landscape and building materials are used, as are the fixtures
demarcating pedestrian paths and lighting the plazas.
The buildings relate to the existing buildings as well as the greater campus context through use
of materials, and clearly demarcate entries to the new venues through strategic use of glazing
and building form.
Addition and Renovation Work
The ECC Gym Addition will be located on the south side of the ECC building, tying in to the
existing first floor. The SVMS Gym Addition will be constructed along the south side of the
existing middle school, between the new locker room addition and existing media center, tying
in to the existing first floor.
Construction will begin in the summer of 2005, and will be completed in the summer of 2006.
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc. Page 2
DESIGN PROCESS /ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The goal has been to make the process of designing the project as open and inclusive as
possible. Through many hours of meetings and discussions, staff members, administrators and
community members have worked with the architectural and construction management teams to
achieve a consensus on the design. The schematic design presented in this report has been
reviewed and endorsed by the Joint Powers Oversight Committee.
Many of the committee members volunteered their time and should be recognized for their
generosity and commitment:
Joint Powers Oversight Committee:
Jim Hovland
Scot Housh
John Keprios
Ed MacHolda
Peyton Robb
Jeff Johnson
Jay Willemssen
Doug Johnson
Architectural /Engineering Team
Ted Rozeboom, Greg Shuster, Doug Bergert, Glenn Waguespack, Rozeboom Miller Architects
Robert Kurtz, Meyer, Borgman, and Johnson
Tom Lind, Bob Tschida, Dunham Associates
Tom Oslund, Tadd Kreun, oslund and associates
Roy Anderson, Jared Lee, Anderson - Johnson Associates
Construction Manager
John Huenink, Kraus Anderson Midwestern Division
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc. Page 3
SCHEMATIC DESIGN NARRATIVE
Site Design
The site plan for the ECC -SVMS Campus was conceived by the simple move of creating a
green space or commons to link all of the various uses of this site with a long sinuous
pedestrian spine. The green space created becomes the heart of the campus and a pedestrian
connection between all of the facilities and parking lots.
Pedestrian Spine: The pedestrian spine connects both the lower lot at SVMS and the south lot
at the ECC allowing pedestrians to circulate to the center of the campus where all of the entries
to the facilities are located. The spine was designed with the vision that is much like a river that
flows through the campus. As the river flows through the site, seat walls located at the plazas
serve as wing dams to slow the flow of people and pull them off of the spine into the gathering
spaces created for events. The pedestrian spine is lighted.
Plazas: The plazas at the new additions serve as gateways at either end of the pedestrian
spine; each has a canopy marking the entry to the site. The new plazas become gathering
spaces for events associated with the gyms, and the ECC plaza becomes a viewing platform
overlooking the stadium. This site vernacular is seen at the Edina High School Gymnasium
plaza, Tennis Court plaza, SVMS addition entries, and locker room entry off of the SVMS
aquatics center. These spaces all are of a similar family of materials of exposed aggregate and
colored concrete, and stacked stone planter walls.
Parking /Circulation: Visitor parking will occur at the lots adjacent to each gym addition.
Landscape Plantings: The plantings for the campus serve to reinforce the design intent,
creating a campus feel and relating the plazas to one another. The pedestrian spine which
connects the new gym plaza at the ECC with the new gym plaza at South View, is planted with
clump form Amur Maples which will provide a stunning red fall color and as these trees mature
the walk will begin to feel enclosed with the arching branches of the trees over the walkway.
The gym plazas are planted with a hedge of Barberry with each entry having a different variety
of Barberry to create interest and variety at each entry while continuing to have some
consistency in plant species. Additionally, there will be perennial plantings for seasonal interest
and color. The new gym plazas at each end of the pedestrian spine will become focal points for
the campus as prominent locations for drop -off and pick up on a daily basis as well as for
stadium events.
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc. Page 4
Building Design
The new building additions will create easily identifiable entries to the new venues. The building
design is based on:
• programmatic considerations, both for daily use and for after hours use
• tying into and expanding upon the existing palette of materials
• attention to natural light
• attention to the building image in non - daylight hours
Building Concepts
Exterior Materials: The palette of materials for both additions will complement the existing
campus palette (brick, metal, glass and stone), and include brick to complement the existing
building, as well as metal wall panels and glazing to include both a clear glazing (storefront or
curtain wall type) system and translucent glazing system where obscured view or diffuse light is
required. The largest masses of the building (the "big boxes ") are clad in mostly brick, and the
adjacent lobby spaces are articulated with metal wall panels and glazing. Architectural precast
panels similar to the existing stone of the ECC and SUMS buildings protect the base of glazed
areas of the building, as well as cladding the toilet room masses adjacent to the lobby at the
ECC addition.
Attention to Natural Light and Building Image After Hours: Daylighting in buildings is a vital
component to the well being and productivity of their inhabitants. Clear glass storefront and
curtain wall systems are used where views in and out of the building are important and some
sunlight is desirable. Translucent glazing is used where glare could be a problem for athletics
and daylight must be diffused. In addition to daylighting issues, the light emitted during predawn
and nighttime hours is an important design consideration. In northern latitudes, where short
winter days are the norm, a building that appears open and lit is a welcome beacon in dark
conditions. Natural light and light emitted from the building at night will welcome people to the
facility. Both transparency and translucency will fulfill these objectives.
Addition
Gymnasium: The new gymnasium will contain fixed bleacher seating (seating 70 @ ECC, 85
@ South View), as well as 6 basketball goals and striping for 1 competition basketball court
and1 volleyball court. Storage areas are directly accessible from the gymnasium space. The
ECC gym will house baseball practice equipment, including an existing practice mound and
existing ceiling mounted retractable batting cage.
Lobby /Support Spaces: The new lobby spaces are the public face of the new addition, and
provide gathering space during events, as well as a securable connection to the existing
buildings. Built in benches provide seating.
The ECC addition lobby includes a new vestibule, concession stand, and public toilets. It
connects the new gymnasium to the existing gymnasium lobby. Curtain wall glazing opens up
views overlooking Kuhlman field.
The SVMS addition lobby includes a vestibule serving both the new gym and existing middle
school. A stair and elevator at the double height lobby provides a secured connection for use
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc. Page 5
by South View students, as well as connection to the existing lower gym and new addition gym
spaces for tournament or school -wide events. A window and skylight allow natural light into the
once - exterior existing science classroom windows. Two toilet rooms and a janitor closet
accessible off the lobby serve the new addition.
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc. Page 6
Building Program
ECC / NORMANDALE GYM ADDITION
Lobby
1720
Vestibule
122
Janitor
45
Roof Access
56
Toilet Rooms (2)
546
Concessions
200
Gymnasium (70 fixed seats)
6255
Storage
332
Existing office remodeled into corridor
438
Existing gym stairs remodeled into exits
100
Subtotal
538 9276
SOUTH VIEW GYM ADDITION
Lobby
1074
Vestibule
423
Janitor
54
Toilet Rooms (2)
625
Gymnasium (85 fixed seats)
6291
Storage
223
Elevator Mechanical
178
Subtotal
0 8868
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc. Page 7
BUILDING SYSTEMS
Exterior Construction
Brick Veneer Walls: masonry cavity walls with precast structural backup; brick will have
special patterns or blends as budget allows.
Metal Panel Walls: standing seam galvalume panels with precast or CMU backup; perforated
metal wall panels at ECC
Architectural Precast Concrete: integrally colored & acid etched panels to match existing
stone veneer with CMU backup at ECC.
Sheet metal flashing and trim: prefinished sheet metal, metallic kynar finish @ brick veneer
wall; galvalume sheet metal @ metal panel walls.
Windows: anodized aluminum, thermally broken, fixed windows with 1" low -E clear glass.
Translucent wall panel glazing system: Double walled polycarbonate with anodized
aluminum frame, thermally broken.
Skylight System (South View): Double walled polycarbonate with anodized aluminum frame
Storefront/Curtain Wall /Entrance: thermally- broken, clear anodized aluminum, 1" low -E clear
glass. ECC gym windows have polycarbonate panels attached to the interior of the storefront
frame where indicated on the elevations.
General Roofing System: Ballasted EPDM membrane roofing system, polyiso rigid insulation.
Gateway Canopies: Painted tube steel framing with perforated metal panels attached to a
secondary tube steel frame.
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc. Page 8
Interior Construction
Partitions: CMU partitions, full height to underside of structure, at new areas. Burnished CMU
at walls exposed to view.
Existing Wall Surfaces: Existing exterior walls on the interior ofAhe_ ECC addition lobby will be
patched and cleaned where exposed. Existing exterior walls on the interior of the SVMS
addition lobby will be cleaned and painted to match new walls.. Sunshades.will be removed
from existing classroom windows looking into the new lobby space.
Interior Windows & Doors: hollow metal frames; aluminum storefront system @ new lobby
vestibules.
Stairs: New stair atthe SVMS lobby will be painted steel stairs w/ integrally colored concrete
treads,
Railings: Painted tube steel railing with painted perforated sheet metal guardrails & painted
steel handrails.
Athletic Equipment: Wall pads, basketball backstops, volleyball inserts. Provisions for
suspending existing baseball batting cage from the ECC gym roof structure.
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inca Page 9
STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS
Design Loads (Minnesota State Building Code)
Roof: 35 psf + required increase for drifted snow load and mech. equip.
Stairs and Corridors: 100 psf
Bleachers: 100 psf
Lobbies: 100 psf
Ceiling and Mechanical: 10 psf, typical
Wind: 90 mph, Exposure B
Seismic: No Seismic Design Required
Materials
Cast -in -Place Concrete: 4000 psi at 28 days: Footings
4000 psi at 28 days: All other concrete, U.N.O.
3000 psi at 28 days: Masonry corefill
All concrete exposed to weather or deicing salts shall be air entrained at the rate of 6% plus or
minus 1 % at the point of placement and have a maximum water /cement ratio of 0.40.
Precast Concrete: 5000 psi minimum at 28 days: All precast components.
Masonry: fm = 2000psi for all concrete masonry units (cmu)
See architect for brick specifications (non- bearing)
Reinforcing Steel: ASTM A615, Grade 60
ASTM A775, Grade 60 Epoxy Coated Reinforcing Steel at all exterior
slabs and stoop slabs that are exposed to deicing salts
Structural Steel: Wide flange shapes: ASTM A992 or A572, Grade 50 unless noted
otherwise
Tube sections: ASTM A500, Grade B
Pipe sections: ASTM A53, Grade B
Channels, Angles, Plates, Anchor bolts: ASTM A36
Connection Bolts: ASTM A325, Type N (Bearing bolts)
Cold Formed
Metal Framing: 6" or 8" deep, 16 gage C- shaped metal studs with minimum 1 5/8" flange
and minimum Y2" return flanges, spaced at 16" o.c
All light gage metal shall be galvanized to G60 specifications.
Typical Roof Deck: 1 -1/2" deep, 20 -gage wide rib steel deck.
Roof Deck at Gym: 1 -1/2" deep, 20 -gage wide rib acoustical steel deck
Live Load Deflection Criteria
Floor and Roof Framing: U360 typical, 3/8" max. at structures above curtain walls
Exterior Studs and Brick Support: U600
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc. Page 10
• Lateral Drift of Building: Height/500 (for entire building and each floor to floor)
Description of Structural Systems
I. South View Middle School Gym General Description
Typical Roof Framing
Gym Roof.- Acoustical steel roof deck over 48 inch deep long span steel joists spaced at 5'-
0° o.c. spanning approximately 60 feet (66 foot span over bleachers). Joists will be bottom chord
bearing on the east end at the translucent wall panel system. Joist panel points are to align.
High Lobby and Steel roof deck over structural steel wide flange beams
Vestibules.
Storage Room 8 inch precast concrete plank
and Toilets.
Canopy. Steel roof deck supported by a HSS structural steel beam and column
welded frame.
General Areas
• General Foundation Requirements: Footing sizes will be determined based on an allowable
bearing capacity of 3000 psf per the soils report prepared by Braun Intertec Corporation
dated 19 January, 2004. A qualified geotechnical engineer shall confirm this value in the
field. All unsuitable fill materials shall be removed from the project area as indicated in the
geotechnical report. Perimeter building footings in heated areas should be placed at least 3'-
6° below the lowest adjacent exterior grade to provide frost protection. Foundation elements
in unheated areas should be placed at least 5 feet below exterior grade for frost protection.
Interior footings may be placed directly beneath the slab -on- grade. All footing elevations will
also be governed by underground utility locations. The elevator pit will be constructed of 12-
inch thick reinforced cast in place concrete.
Footings: Due to the elevation difference between the exterior grade and the gymnasium
floor (roughly 15'), the west wall and portions of the north and south walls of the gymnasium
will require a cantilevered concrete retaining wall (minimum thickness of 18 inches) to resist
the lateral earth pressure. The exterior of the retaining wall should be protected with a
complete membrane water proofing system that includes drainage panels and a continuous
drain tile system. The retaining wall extends around the north and south walls of the gym as
required by the exterior grade and changes to a conventional spread footing at frost depth.
Note that temporary shoring of existing foundations will likely be required prior to excavation
for the new retaining wall. The exterior precast wall panels (see below) will bear on the
concrete retaining wall, concrete foundation walls where required or directly on concrete
footings.
• A new concrete foundation is required to support the existing ACC mechanical unit to be
relocated on the west side of the new gym.
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc. Page 11
Exterior Walls: The gym enclosure consists of 10" thick x 10' -0" wide precast load bearing
wall panels. Precast beams and columns shall support the wall panels and brick above the
window openings in the southwest corner of the gym. The completed precast system must
be capable of resisting the vertical loads, in -plane lateral loads and out of plane lateral
loads. Dovetail slot anchors are required in the panels where exterior brick veneer is
located. 8" cmu walls with brick veneer can be used at the toilet rooms. A portion of the
entry vestibule walls will be glass curtain wall with a structural steel frame that provides both
lateral support for the curtain wall and gravity load support for the roof structure.
• Interior Walls: Typical interior walls will be 8" cmu bearing on a continuous concrete footing.
The elevator shaft walls shall be 8" reinforced cmu. Non -load bearing partition walls less
than 15' -0" tall will be 8" cmu supported by a thickened slab -on- grade. Provide vertical slip
connection to structure at the top of the partition walls.
Slab -on- Grade: Typical slab on grade will be 4" thick and reinforced with fibermesh at the
rate of 1.5 pounds per cubic yard. Slabs with exposed concrete finishes will be reinforced
with #4 bars at 24" on center in lieu of fibermesh. All slabs on grade shall have control joints
sawn immediately after placement using the "soft -cut" procedure and spaced at a maximum
of 15 feet apart in each direction. See the architectural drawings for vapor barrier
recommendations below the slab on grade.
• Retractable Bleachers: Slab on grade requirements for support of the retractable bleachers
shall be verified with the manufacturer.
• Lobby and Entry Areas: Structural steel framing as required for support of curtain wall and
linear glass elements.
• Expansion Joint: An expansion joint will be placed between the new and existing structures.
Design of appropriate flashing and expansion joint details will be required.
Primary Lateral Load Resisting System
• Lateral loads will be transferred from the roof deck diaphragm system to the perimeter
precast wall panels and cmu walls.
Interior Work
• A new steel stair and second floor steel framed platform will connect the main floor of the
lobby to the new elevator and existing second floor hall.
II. Edina Community Center Gym General Description
Typical Roof Framing
Gym Root Acoustical steel roof deck over 48" deep long span steel joists spaced at 5' -0"
o.c. spanning approximately 60 feet. Joist panel points are to align.
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc.- Page 12
Toilets,
Concessions,
Storage: 8" precast concrete plank spanning 15' -0" maximum
Lobby. Steel roof deck over structural steel wide flange beams
Canopy. Steel roof deck supported by a HSS structural steel beam and column welded
frame
General Areas
• General Foundation Requirements: Footing sizes will be determined based on an allowable
bearing capacity of 3000 psf per the soils report prepared by Braun Intertec Corporation
dated 19 January, 2004. A qualified geotechnical engineer shall confirm this value in the
field. All unsuitable fill materials shall be removed from the project area as indicated in the
geotechnical report. Perimeter building footings in heated areas should be placed at least 3'-
6" below the lowest adjacent exterior grade to provide frost protection. Foundation elements
in unheated areas should be placed at least 5 feet below exterior grade for frost protection.
Interior footings may be placed directly beneath the slab -on- grade. All footing elevations will
also be governed by underground utility locations.
• Footings: Precast concrete wall panels shall bear on concrete foundation walls where
required or directly on continuous concrete footings. Other walls will be supported by
conventional spread footings.
Exterior Walls: The gym enclosure consists of 10" thick x 10' -0" wide precast load bearing
wall panels. Precast columns and beams shall support the wall panels and brick above the
storefront glazing systems at the southeast and northwest corners of the gymnasium. The
completed precast system must be capable of resisting the vertical loads, in -plane lateral
loads and out of plane lateral loads. Dovetail slot anchors are required in the panels where
exterior brick veneer is located. 8" cmu walls with brick veneer can be used at the toilet
rooms, concession area and storage room.
• Interior Walls: Typical interior walls will be 8" cmu bearing on a continuous concrete footing.
Non -load bearing partition walls less than 15' -0" tall will be 8" cmu supported by a thickened
slab -on- grade. Provide vertical slip connection to structure at the top of the partition walls.
• Slab -on- Grade: Typical slab on grade will be 4" thick and reinforced with fibermesh at the
rate of 1.5 pounds per cubic yard. Slabs with exposed concrete finishes will be reinforced
with #4 bars at 24" on center in lieu of fibermesh. All slabs on grade shall have control joints
sawn immediately after placement using the "soft -cut" procedure and spaced at a maximum
of 15 feet apart in each direction. See the architectural drawings for vapor barrier
recommendations below the slab on grade.
• Retractable Bleachers: Slab on grade requirements for support of the retractable bleachers
shall be verified with the manufacturer
• Expansion Joint: An expansion joint will be placed between the new and existing structures.
Design of appropriate flashing and expansion joint details will be required
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc. Page 13
Primary Lateral Load Resisting System
• Lateral loads will be transferred from the roof deck diaphragm system to the perimeter
precast wall panels and cmu walls.
Provisions for Future Expansion
None.
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc. Page 14
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS
SOUTH VIEW GYM MECHANICAL
GENERAL
1. The work described in this document will include all materials, labor, equipment and
services to construct and install a complete operating mechanical system for the Edina
City Gymnasium Addition at South View Middle School. The design of the mechanical
systems is based upon this narrative.
DESIGN CONDITIONS
1.
Outdoor:
a.
Winter = -16 °F DB
2.
Indoor:
a.
Winter = 72 °F
3.
°U"
Values (new construction
a.
Walls = To be determined (TBD).
b.
Roof = TBD.
c.
Windows = TBD.
4.
Occuaancv Levels for load and ventilation rate calculations:
a.
Designed to meet ASHRAE design conditions unless noted as follows:
1) Gymnasium = Seating area + 30.
2) Lobby = 50% of Gymnasium.
5.
Ventilation Air Quantities:
a.
Designed to meet ASHRAE design outdoor air as designated per space usage.
b.
Designed to meet ASHRAE multiple space requirements as applicable.
c.
Designed to provide make -up air as required to meet exhaust demand.
SITE UTILITIES
1. Domestic Water Service: The existing School water service will provide the domestic
water needs of the addition.
2. Fire Protection Water Service: The existing School fire service will serve the needs of
the additions.
3. Sanitary Sewer: No new site connections to Sanitary Sewer are foreseen for this
project.
4. Storm Sewer: Existing catch basin CB 8 (BP -2, sheet C2.10) will require
relocation. Interior storm drains will be rerouted to the new location of CB 8.
Gymnasium addition roof drainage will connect to the new location of CB 8.
5. Natural Gas: No new site connections to natural gas are foreseen for this project.
PLUMBING SYSTEMS
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc. Page 15
Domestic Water: The existing domestic water systems will be extended to the Gymnasium
addition areas to serve toilet rooms. These include hot water, recirculated hot water
and cold -water piping.
Sanitary Waste and Vent System: Sanitary waste and vent piping will be provided to each
plumbing fixture. Sanitary waste piping will route through the tunnel and connect to a
main sewer line in the boiler room.
Roof Drainage System: Roof drains (cast iron body with aluminum dome) and piping will be
installed. Overflow drainage will be accomplished using scuppers in the roof parapet.
Overflow roof drains will be added to isolated roofs where required. The overflow roof
drain system will "daylight" through a wall mounted discharge nozzle.
Plumbing Fixtures:
Water closets: Wall hung, flush valve, 1.6 gallons per flush.
Urinals: Wall hung, flush valve, 1.0 gallons per flush.
Lavatories: Vitreous china, wall hung or counter mounted with mixing faucet.
Electric Water Coolers: Wall hung accessible.
Service Sinks: Floor- mounted 24 "x 24" receptors in custodial closets and wall mounted
sinks in Mechanical Rooms with mixing faucets.
Plumbing Materials:
a. Domestic water piping: Type L copper with 95/5 soldered joints.
b. Sanitary waste and vent: Service weight cast iron with no -hub couplings above
grade and hub - and - spigot joints below grade.
c. Rain water piping: Service weight cast iron with no -hub couplings above grade and
hub - and - spigot joints below grade. Bid option for schedule 40 PVC with solvent
joints below grade.
Plumbing Insulation:
Type: Rigid preformed fiberglass type with vapor proof all service jacket.
Application: Domestic cold, hot, and recirculated hot water piping, horizontal rainwater
leaders.
FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM
Fire Protection System:
The school's wet -pipe sprinkler system will be extended to protect the Gymnasium
Addition.
HEATING SYSTEM
1. Steam Systems: The school's existing low- pressure steam boilers will provide heating
for the Gymnasium addition. Steam piping will be extended to the new air handler
heating coil.
2. Condensate Return System: Condensate will be returned to the existing boiler feed
system using the new condensate receiver CRA (CRA may need to be increased in
size).
3. Hydronic Systems: Building- heating water for the Gymnasium addition will be produced
in the new steam -to -water U -tube heat exchangers. The pumping system will not need
to be increased to accommodate the additional heating requirements.
4. Terminal Units:
a. Duct mounted heating coils for zone temperature control, 1 or 2 rows as required.
b. Cabinet Unit Heaters in vestibules and exit stairwells.
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc. Page 16
c. Vertical or Horizontal unit heaters in mechanical equipment and storage rooms.
d. Finned tube radiation at exterior walls.
5. Piping Materials:
a. Low Pressure Steam: Schedule 40 seamless steel pipe with flanged, or welded
fittings for pipe sizes 2 -1/2" and larger. Schedule 40 seamless steel pipe with
screwed or butt- welded fittings for pipe sizes 2" and below.
b. Condensate: Schedule 80 seamless steel with flanged, or welded fittings for pipe
sizes 2 -1/2" and larger. Schedule 80 black steel with socket welded fittings for pipe
sizes 2" and below.
c. Hydronic Heating Water: Schedule 40 black steel with flanged, welded, or cut
grooved mechanical couplings for pipe sizes 2 -1/2" and larger. Schedule 40 black
steel with screwed fittings or Type `L' copper with soldered fittings for pipe sizes 2"
and below.
6. Piping Installation: Pump piping connections will be made with flexible connectors.
7. Piping Insulation:
a. Type: Rigid preformed fiberglass type with vapor proof all service jacket.
b. Application: All steam, condensate and hydronic water piping.
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc. Page 17
AIR HANDLING SYSTEMS
General: Unit will be factory- fabricated modular OUTDOOR unit by Trane, McQuay, or
York. Sizes are preliminary estimates based on occupancy, and square footage.
a. Cabinet construction will be 2" thick insulated double wall with solid internal liner
unless noted as perforated liner.
City of Edina Gymnasium (AHU -9): This unit will be a Constant Volume, zone heating air
handling unit, 14,000 CFM capacity, with the following sectional components:
Roof mounted relief hoods with automatic control dampers.
Inlet Section with outside air damper, and return air damper with economizer controls.
Minimum outside air quantity will be set during balancing.
Filter section with 30% efficient pre - filters and 65% efficient 4" deep cartridge final
filters.
Access /Inspection Section for access to cartridge filters.
Steam heating coil (face- and - bypass damper) section with discharge air temperature
controls.
Access /Inspection Section for control sensor installation.
Chilled water - cooling and dehumidification coils with drain pans and discharge control
(Section Only).
Access /Inspection Section for control sensor installation.
Centrifugal supply fan with low discharge sound characteristics, and mounted on spring
vibration isolators. Cabinet liner shall be perforated.
Air Handler Locations:
AHU -9 will be located on the roof of the Gymnasium.
Distribution Systems:
Ductwork Systems (All): Low - pressure ductwork systems shall be G90 galvanized steel,
rectangular or round. Exposed ductwork shall have a mill phosphatized finish to
accept field painting. All constant volume supply, all retum/relief, and general
exhaust will be constructed to SMACNA 2" pressure class with seal class W.
Duct Insulation: Two -inch thick rigid fiberglass with foil face in mechanical equipment
rooms for supply, return, relief, and outside air ductwork. One -inch thick flexible
fiberglass with foil face for supply and return air in unconditioned spaces (i.e. shafts
and above ceilings). External ductwork will be insulated with 2" thick fiberglass
covered with a field applied aluminum jacket, or factory fabricated double wall
ductwork.
Internal liner will be installed only in locations where it can be inspected and cleaned
and where required for sound attenuation. Liner will be mat -faced 3 -pcf fiberglass.
Air Inlets and Outlets: Supply air will be distributed using wall registers with double
deflection adjustable vanes, round ceiling diffusers in areas with exposed ductwork, and
square louvered -face ceiling diffusers in rooms with ceilings. Return and exhaust air
inlets will be wall registers and grilles with fixed 450 degree vanes or grates with 1" cube
openings, and ceiling egg crate registers and grilles.
Sound Control: Specified sound criteria will be as follows: RC -40N (Lobby, Gymnasium).
Noise generated at the air handling units will be attenuated using a combination of
acoustical sound plenum enclosures, sound traps, ductwork fittings, and
manufactured duct mounted sound attenuators with perforated internal liners
covering faced fiberglass insulation.
Noise generated by air movement in ductwork will be controlled through established
design criteria, including low air velocity, and radius elbows. Square elbows with
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc. Page 18
turning vanes, flow splitters, terminal duct mounted attenuators, and other terminal
duct accessories will not be used.
Spring vibration isolators will be used on fans, pump isolation bases, ductwork, and
piping located in the Mechanical Equipment Rooms.
Exhaust Ventilation:
General: Roof mounted centrifugal fans will provide the exhaust needs as identified
below. All fans will be equipped with motorized isolation dampers in the ductwork
near the roof penetration.
PRV -16: Exhausts the Edina Gymnasium Toilet rooms (1,500 CFM), and will be
scheduled to operate with AHU -9 in the occupied mode.
PRV -17: Exhausts the Elevator equipment room (600 CFM), and will be scheduled
to operate with AHU -9 in the occupied mode.
BUILDING AUTOMATION SYSTEM (BAS):
The building automation system will include automatic controls for monitoring and control of
building temperature, humidity, and pressure. System components will include
microprocessor based stand -alone field panels, electronic sensors, electric operators,
wiring. A personnel computer workstation will be provided within the building.
Testing, Adjusting, and Balancing
Provide testing of the following systems:
Air and water balancing of revised systems.
Commissioning of all new and revised mechanical systems described herein.
South View Middle School Modifications Reguired (BP #10 Proposal Request):
The following work in the Middle School is required due to the Gymnasium Addition
Relocation of Chiller CH -1 and relocation of chilled water piping.
Deletion of outside air louver and extension of outside air duct to new roof mounted
intake hood.
Increase CRA capacity to include AHU -9 heating coil.
ESL Room 225: The ESL classroom will be provided with new ventilation, and air
conditioning from a new unit ventilator (Airedale type.)
Science Room 125: The Science classroom will be provided with new ventilation, and
air conditioning from a new unit ventilator (Airedale type.)
Rooms 127 and 227: These classrooms will require modifications to their existing unit
ventilator outside /condenser air inlets /outlets.
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc. - Page 19
EDINA COMMUNITY CENTER GYM MECHANICAL
GENERAL
1. The work described in this document will include all materials, labor, equipment and
services to construct and install a complete operating mechanical system for the Edina
City Gymnasium Addition at the Edina Community Center. The design of the
mechanical systems is based upon this narrative.
DESIGN CONDITIONS
Outdoor:
Winter = -16 °F DB
Indoor:
Winter = 72 °F
"U" Values (new construction):
Walls = To be determined (TBD).
Roof = TBD.
Windows = TBD.
Occupancy Levels for load and ventilation rate calculations:
Designed to meet ASHRAE design conditions unless noted as follows:
Gymnasium = Seating area + 30.
Lobby = 60% of Gymnasium.
Ventilation Air Quantities:
Designed to meet ASHRAE design outdoor air as designated per space usage.
Designed to meet ASHRAE multiple space requirements as applicable.
Designed to provide make -up air as required meeting exhaust demand.
SITE UTILITIES
Domestic Water Service: The existing School water service will provide the domestic water
needs of the addition.
Fire Protection Water Service: The existing School fire service will serve the needs of the
additions.
Sanitary Sewer: No new site connections to Sanitary Sewer are foreseen for this project.
Storm Sewer: Existing catch basin CB 19 (BP -2, sheet C2.10) may require relocation.
Storm drains from the new Normandale Elementary School Addition will require
rerouting to an additional catch basin, or a relocated CB 19. Gymnasium addition roof
drainage will connect to the new location of CB 19 and /or MH 110.
Natural Gas: No new site connections to natural gas are foreseen for this project.
PLUMBING SYSTEMS
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc. Page 20
Domestic Water: The existing domestic water systems will be extended to the Gymnasium
addition areas to serve toilet rooms. These include hot water, recirculated hot water
and cold -water piping.
Sanitary Waste and Vent System: Sanitary waste and vent piping will be provided to each
plumbing fixture. Sanitary waste piping will route below the existing, Locker Room
floor and connect to -existing sanitary drain lines.
_Roof Drainage System. Roof drains. (cast iron body with aluminum dome) and piping will be
installed: Overflow drainage will be accomplished -using scuppers in the roof parapet.
Overflow roof drains will be.added to isolated roofs where required. The overflow roof
drain system will "daylight" through a wallmounted discharge nozzle.
Plumbing Fixtures
Water, closets: Wall hung, flush valve, 1.6 gallons. per flush.
Urinals: Wall hung, flush valve; 1.0 gallons per flush.
Lavatories:_ Vitreous china,' wall hung or counter mounted with mixing faucet.
Electric Water Coolers: Wall hung accessible.
Sinks: Stainless steel of sizes, required.
Service Sinks: Floor- mounted 24 °x 24" receptors in custodial closets and wall mounted
sinks in Mechanical Rooms with mixing faucets.
Plumbing Materials:
d. Domestic water piping: Type L copper with 95/5 soldered joints.
e. Sanitary waste and vent: Service weight cast iron with no -hub couplings above
grade and hub - and - spigot joints below grade.
f. Rain water piping: Service weight cast iron with no -hub couplings above grade.and
hub - and - spigot joints below grade. Bid option for schedule 40 PVC with solvent
joints below grade.
Plumbing Insulation:
Type: Rigid preformed fiberglass type with vapor proof all service jacket.
Application:, Domestic cold, hot, and recirculated hot water piping, horizontal rainwater
leaders.
FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM
Fire Protection System:
The school's new wet -pipe sprinkler system will be extended to protect the Gymnasium
Addition.
HEATING: SYSTEM
Steam Systems: The school's existing low- pressure steam boilers will provide`heating for
the. Gymnasium addition. Steam piping will be extended to the new air handler- heating
coil.
Condensate Return System: Condensate will be returned by gravity.to the boiler room.
Hydronic Systems: Building- heating water for the Gymnasium addition will be produced in a
new steam -to -water U -tube heat exchanger. Inline pumps will circulate heating water to
the terminal units.
Terminal Units:
a. Duct mounted heating coils for zone temperature control, 1 or 2 rows as required.
b. Cabinet Unit_ Heaters in vestibules and exit stairwells.
C. Vertical or Horizontal unit heaters in mechanical equipment and storage rooms.
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc. Page 21
d. Finned tube radiation at exterior walls.
AIR HANDLING SYSTEMS
General: Units will be factory- fabricated modular units by Trane, McQuay, or York. Sizes
are preliminary estimates based on occupancy, and square footage.
a. Cabinet construction will be 2" thick insulated double wall with solid internal liner
unless noted as perforated liner.
City of Edina Gymnasium (AHU -8): This unit will Constant Volume, zone heating air
handling unit, 14,000 CFM capacity, with the following sectional components:
Roof mounted relief hoods with automatic control dampers.
Inlet Section with outside air damper, and return air damper with economizer controls.
Minimum outside air quantity will be set during balancing.
Filter section with 30% efficient pre - filters and 65% efficient 4" deep cartridge final
filters.
Access /Inspection Section for access to cartridge filters.
Steam heating coil (face- and - bypass damper) section with discharge air temperature
controls.
Access /Inspection Section for control sensor installation.
Chilled water - cooling and dehumidification coils with drain pans and discharge control
(Section Only).
Access /Inspection Section for control sensor installation.
Centrifugal supply fan with low discharge sound characteristics, and mounted on spring
vibration isolators. Cabinet liner shall be perforated.
Air Handler Locations:
AHU -8 will be located on the Lobby roof.
Distribution Systems:
Ductwork Systems (All): Low - pressure ductwork systems shall be G90 galvanized steel,
rectangular or round. Exposed ductwork shall have a mill phosphatized finish to
accept field painting. All constant volume supply, all return/relief, and general
exhaust will be constructed to SMACNA 2" pressure class with seal class W.
Duct Insulation: Two -inch thick rigid fiberglass with foil face in mechanical equipment
rooms for supply, return, relief, and outside air ductwork. One -inch thick flexible
fiberglass with foil face for supply and return air in unconditioned spaces (i.e. shafts
and above ceilings). External ductwork will be insulated with 2" thick fiberglass
covered with a field applied aluminum jacket, or factory fabricated double wall
ductwork.
Internal liner will be installed only in locations where it can be inspected and cleaned
and where required for sound attenuation. Liner will be mat -faced 3 -pcf fiberglass.
Air Inlets and Outlets: Supply air will be distributed using wall registers with double
deflection adjustable vanes, round ceiling diffusers in areas with exposed ductwork, and
square louvered -face ceiling diffusers in rooms with ceilings. Return and exhaust air
inlets will be wall registers and grilles with fixed 45° degree vanes or grates with 1" cube
openings, and ceiling egg crate registers and grilles.
Sound Control: Specified sound criteria will be as follows: RC-40N (Lobby, Gymnasium).
Noise generated at the air handling units will be attenuated using a combination of
acoustical sound plenum enclosures, sound traps, ductwork fittings, and
manufactured duct mounted sound attenuators with perforated internal liners
covering faced fiberglass insulation.
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inca Page 22
Noise generated by air movement in ductwork will be controlled through established
design criteria, including low air velocity, and radius elbows. Square elbows with
turning vanes, flow splitters, terminal duct mounted attenuators, and other terminal
duct accessories will not be used.
Spring vibration isolators will be used on fans, pump isolation bases, ductwork, and
piping located in the Mechanical Equipment Rooms..
Exhaust Ventilation:
General: Roof mounted centrifugal fans will provide the exhaust needs as identified
below. All fans .will. be equipped with motorized, isolation dampers 'in the ductwork
near the roof penetration.
PRV -X :..Exhausts the Edina Gymnasium Toilet..rooms (1;,300 CFM), and will be
scheduled;to.operate with AHU -8 in the occupied mode.
PRV -XX: Exhausts the' Concession Room (400 CFM), and will be controlled by a
switch with = pilot 1ight.
BUILDING AUTOMATION SYSTEM (BAS):
The building automation system will include automatic controls for monitoring and control of
building temperature, humidity, and pressure. System components will include
microprocessor based stand -alone field panels, electronic sensors, electric operators,
and wiring.
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc. Page 23
ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS
SOUTH VIEW GYM ELECTRICAL
I. GENERAL
1. The work described in this document will include all materials, labor, equipment and
services to construct and install a complete operating electrical system for the Edina
City Gymnasium Addition to South View Middle School. The design of the electrical
systems is based upon this narrative.
II. APPLICABLE CODES
All electrical systems for this facility will be designed in accordance with the Minnesota
Building Codes as well as. other industry recognized codes and standards. The
applicable codes and standards include, but are not limited to, the following:
a. International Building Code (IBC).
b. National Electrical Code — 2002 edition.
C. Illuminating Engineering Society of North America Handbook, 9t' Ed.
d. NFPA —1997
e. Minnesota Energy Code, Chapter 7676, 1999
111. BASIC ELECTRICAL MATERIALS AND METHODS
Emphasis in equipment and systems selection will be placed on manufacturers
readily available to and serviceable from the local metropolitan area. Equipment
used will be manufacturer's standard where possible. Manufacturers currently used
in the District will be considered to aid in minimizing stocking of multiple equipment
types.
IV. POWER DISTRIBUTION AND WIRING
1. Main Service:
a. Extend a 600 amp - 277/480 volt feeder from the 3000 amp main switchboard —
MSB -1 located in the in the electrical vault adjacent to the existing boiler room.
Provide new 600 amp -3 phase fused switch in MSB -1.
b. Install new 600 amp, 277/480 volt, 3- phase, 4 -wire distribution switchboard in
the new Gym storage room.
C. Install a new 112.5 KVA transformer in the gym storage room to feed a new
400 amp, 120/208 volt 3- phase, 4 wire switchboard located in the gym storage
room. Transformer to be fed from the new 600 amp 480 volt distribution
switchboard.
2. Distribution Panels:
a. A 600 amp, 277/480 volt, 3- phase, 4 wire volt distribution panel will be added in
the gymnasium storage room.
3. Panelboards:
a. A 400 amp, 3 phase, 120/208 volt panelboard shall be added to gym storage
room.
b. Panelboards shall be circuit breaker type.
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc. Page 24
4. 480V 3 phase circuits will be used for large motors, pumps, plumbing, HVAC, etc.
5. Emergency Power:
a. Extend 3- 20 amp circuits from existing "Emergency " lighting panel to service the
"Life Safety" circuits in the new addition and remodeled areas.
IV. INTERIOR LIGHTING AND CONTROL
New lighting will consist of T -8 fluorescent lamps and electronic ballasts, along with
daylight harvesting and occupancy controls as recommended by the Minnesota State
Energy code and other energy conservation organizations.
a. Typical lighting shall be T -8 — 32 -watt fluorescent lamps with solid -state
electronic 277V (120 volt) ballasts. Typical 3 lamp fixture schemes shall utilize
"Master - Slave" ballast configuration.
b. Corridor
1) Typical Corridor lighting shall consist of 2'x 4'2 lamp fluorescent
fixtures with prismatic lenses spaced approximately 10' on center.
2) Selected fixtures, approximately 30' on center, shall be connected to the
"emergency" power source for egress lighting.
3) Selected fixtures, typically near building entrances, shall be on 24 hours
a day for security lighting.
4) Exit lights shall have brushed aluminum faces with red letters, LED type
per energy code guidelines. Exit lights shall be connected to the
emergency generator.
5) Manual "keyed" switches shall control corridor lighting.
6) Corridor lighting shall be designed to achieve an average of 25 FC.
C. Storage / Mechanical Rooms:
1) Storage and Mechanical Areas shall 4' industrial fluorescent, 2 lamp
fixtures; chain hung or surface mounted directly to structure, provided
with wire guards. If a suspended ceiling is provided, recessed 1' x 4'
fluorescent fixtures with prismatic lenses will be used.
d. Gym:
1) New gym lighting shall have 400 watt pulse start "High Bay" HID
fixtures.
2) New gym fixtures shall be equipped with Multi -tap ballasts for "multi -
Level" lighting.
3) New gym shall be designed to achieve 65 fc.
e. Lobby:
1) Lobby lighting shall utilize twin 57 watt PLT -10" down lights. Light levels
in Lobby area shall be designed to achieve a light level of 35 FC.
f. Restrooms:
1) Restroom lighting shall utilize a combination of cove lights and down
lights. Light levels in restrooms shall be designed to achieve a light level
of 30 FC.
V. EXTERIOR LIGHTING
1. Building Perimeter
a. Building Perimeter shall be lit with a combination of building mounted lights and
area walkway pole mounted lights. Walkway shall be metal halide, typically
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc. Page 25
100 watt luminaries mounted 12' above grade, located as required to achieve
an average of 1 fc along walkways. Light fixtures shall match the new fixtures
installed during the "Site Development " portion of the Edina School projects.
b. Metal halide downlights in canopies.
C. Significant architectural features may be highlighted with floodlights, or wall
mounted fixtures.
d. Perimeter lighting shall be controlled with a photocell and time clock. Entrance
fixtures shall remain on all night or as dictated by time clock (District decision).
VII. DATA SYSTEM
1. Data infrastructure upgrades shall be implemented as part of a separate District wide
"Bid Package ".
2. Data related installations which shall be part of this project shall be as follows:
a. Installation of a minimum of 5 data openings in gym.
b. Installation of a minimum of 35 data openings in Lobby area.
c. Data opening rough -ins shall consist of a 2 -gang steel junction box with a single
gang extension ring. A minimum of a 1" conduit routed from the junction box
and stubbed into an open ceiling area. The conduit stub shall be complete with
a bushed fitting at the conduit end terminating in the ceiling space.
d. 2" conduit stubs shall be installed through fire rated partitions for protection of
data cabling. These conduits shall be provided with a `Mire stopping" material
upon completion of data cabling installation.
e. Camera (Security) opening rough -ins shall consist of a 2-gang steel junction box
with a single gang extension ring. A minimum of a 1" conduit routed from the
junction box and stubbed into an open ceiling area. The conduit stub shall be
complete with a bushed fitting at the conduit end terminating in the ceiling
space.
f. Provide data connections to scoreboard.
VIII PAGING SYSTEM
1. Paging system shall consist of an extension of the existing "Dukane" paging system
presently located in the South View office area.
2. Paging speakers shall be added to the gym, lobby and restroom areas.
IX CLOCK SYSTEM
New "Atomic" clocks will be installed in all new Public spaces and gym. The existing
clock system will not be extended to the new and renovated areas.
XII MECHANICAL SYSTEMS
1. Provide electrical power connections to new mechanical Air Handling and cooling
systems.
a. Air Handling Units.
b. Roof Mounted Exhaust Fans.
C. Cabinet Unit Hebters.
d. Heating Water Pumps.
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc. Page 26
X111 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM
1. Fire alarm upgrades to the existing system shall be implemented as part of a
separate District wide "Bid Package".
2. Fire Alarm related installations which shall be part of this project will be to provide a
conduit infra - structure to accommodate the future district wide fire alarm upgrade as
follows:
a. Manual pull stations shall be located at all the building engineer's office, boiler
room and main administrative offices.
b. Smoke detectors shall be located as follows:
1) Corridors: Maximum 30 feet on center, maximum 15 feet from corridor
ends.
2) Storage rooms.
3) Maintenance and mechanical equipment rooms.
4) Top of stairs /mezzanines.
c. Heat Detectors shall be located as follows:
1) Kitchen.
2) Boiler room.
d. Duct Detectors shall be located as follows:
1) Per NFPA guidelines, typically in supply and return ductwork for air
handling units over 2,000 CFM.
e. Horn/Strobes shall be located as follows:
1) Position DA 75 candela horn/strobe combination units in corridors,
spaced approximately 50' on center.
2) Large assembly rooms: gymnasium, media center, etc., not to exceed
100 feet on center.
3) Areas with high ambient noise levels: machine rooms, wood /metal
cutting areas, music.
4) Exterior of building: locate in areas of outdoor assembly; weatherproof.
5) Mini -hom strobes (30 candela) in classrooms.
6) Mini-horn strobes (30 candela) in Music practice rooms.
f. Strobes, due to ADA requirements, strobe units are required in the following
areas:
1) Public toilets.
2) Each classroom.
3) Public accessible conference rooms.
g. Interface fire alarm control panel's alarm output with the Building Management
System and an auto dialer to notify responsible party(s).
h. Monitor Fire protection system tamper and flow switches.
i. Interface Fire alarm system with Air Handling equipment to accomplish unit shut
down upon activation of fire alarm system per NFPA.
j. Connection of the Fire Protection system tamper/flow switches to the existing fire
alarm system.
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc. Page 27
EDINA COMMUNITY CENTER GYM ELECTRICAL
I. GENERAL
The work described in this document will include all materials, labor, equipment and
services to construct and install a complete operating electrical system for the Edina
City Gymnasium Addition to the Edina Community Center. The design of the
electrical systems is based upon this narrative.
II. APPLICABLE CODES
1. All electrical systems for this facility will be designed in accordance with the
Minnesota Building Codes as well as other industry recognized codes and standards.
The applicable codes and standards include, but are not limited to, the following:
a. International Building Code (IBC).
b. National Electrical Code — 2002 edition.
C. Illuminating Engineering Society of North America Handbook, 91' Ed.
d. NFPA —1997
e. Minnesota Energy Code, Chapter 7676, 1999
III. BASIC ELECTRICAL MATERIALS AND METHODS
Emphasis in equipment and systems selection will be placed on manufacturers
readily available to and serviceable from the local metropolitan area. Equipment
used will be manufacturer's standard where possible. Manufacturers currently used
in the District will be considered to aid in minimizing stocking of multiple equipment
types.
IV. POWER DISTRIBUTION AND WIRING
1. Main Service:
a. Extend a 400 amp- 277/480 volt feeder from the 2000 amp main switchboard —
MSB -1 located in the in the electrical vault adjacent to the existing boiler room.
Provide new 400 amp -3 phase fused switch in MSB -1.
b. Install new 400 amp, 277/480 volt, 3- phase, 4 -wire distribution switchboard in the
new Gym storage room.
c. Install anew 112.5 KVA transformer in the gym storage room to feed anew 400
amp, 120/208 volt 3- phase, 4 wire panelboard located in the gym storage
room. Transformer to be fed from the new 400 amp 480 volt distribution
switchboard.
2. Distribution Panels:
a. A 400 amp, 277/480 volt, 3- phase, 4 wire volt distribution panel will be added in
the gymnasium storage room.
3. Panelboards:
a. A 400 amp, 3 phase, 120/208 volt panelboard shall be installed in gym storage
room.
b. Panelboards shall be circuit breaker type.
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc. Page 28
4. 480V 3 phase circuits will be used for large motors, pumps, plumbing, HVAC, etc.
5. Extend 5 -20 amp -120 volt circuits and 1 -30 amp- 208 volt circuit to concessions
stand.
6. Extend 3 -20 amp circuits from existing "Emergency" lighting panel to service the
"Life Safety" circuits in the new addition and remodeled areas.
IV INTERIOR LIGHTING AND CONTROL
1. New lighting will consist of T -8 fluorescent lamps and electronic ballasts, along with
daylight harvesting and occupancy controls as recommended by the Minnesota State
Energy code and other energy conservation organizations.
a. Typical lighting shall be T -8 — 32 -watt fluorescent lamps with solid -state
electronic 277V (120 volt) ballasts. Typical 3 lamp fixture schemes shall utilize
"Master - Slave" ballast configuration.
b. Corridor
1) Typical Corridor lighting shall consist of 2' x 4' 2 lamp fluorescent
fixtures with prismatic lenses spaced approximately 10' on center.
2) Selected fixtures, approximately 30' on center, shall be connected to the
"emergency" power source for egress lighting.
3) Selected fixtures, typically near building entrances, shall be on 24 hours
a day for security lighting.
4) Exit lights shall have brushed aluminum faces with red letters, LED type
per energy code guidelines. Exit lights shall be connected to the
emergency generator.
5) Manual "keyed" switches shall control corridor lighting.
6) Corridor lighting shall be designed to achieve an average of 25 FC.
C. Storage / Mechanical Rooms:
1) Storage and Mechanical Areas shall 4' industrial fluorescent, 2 lamp
fixtures; chain hung or surface mounted directly to structure, provided
with wire guards. If a suspended ceiling is provided, recessed V x 4'
fluorescent fixtures with prismatic lenses will be used.
d. Gym:
1) New gym lighting shall have 400 watt pulse start "High Bay' HID
fixtures.
2) New gym fixtures shall be equipped with Multi -tap ballasts for "multi -
Level" lighting.
3) New gym shall be designed to achieve 65 FC.
e. Lobby
1) Lobby lighting shall utilize twin 57 watt PLT -10" down lights. Light levels
in Lobby area shall be designed to achieve a light level of 35 FC.
f. Restrooms
1) Restroom lighting shall utilize a combination of fluorescent cove lights
and down lights. Light levels in restrooms shall be designed to achieve
a light level of 30 FC.
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc. - Page 29
V. EXTERIOR LIGHTING
Building Perimeter
a. Building Perimeter shall be illuminated with a combination of building mounted
lights and area walkway pole mounted lights. Walkway shall be metal halide,
typically 100 watt luminaries mounted 12' above grade, located as required to
achieve an average of 1 FC along walkways. Light fixtures shall match the new
fixtures installed during the "Site Development " portion of the Edina School
projects.
b. Metal halide down lights in canopies.
C. Significant architectural features may be highlighted with floodlights, or wall
mounted fixtures.
d. Perimeter lighting shall be controlled with a photo -cell and time clock. Entrance
fixtures shall remain on all night or as dictated by time clock (District decision).
Vll DATA SYSTEM
1. Data infrastructure upgrades shall be implemented as part of a separate District wide
"Bid Package ".
2. Data related installations which shall be part of this project shall be as follows:
a. Installation of a minimum of 5 data openings in gym.
b. Installation of a minimum of 35 data openings in Lobby area.
c. Data opening rough -ins shall consist of a 2-gang steel junction box with a single
gang extension ring. A minimum of a 1" conduit routed from the junction box
and stubbed into an open ceiling area. The conduit stub shall be complete with
a bushed fitting at the conduit end terminating in the ceiling space.
d. 2" conduit stubs shall be installed through fire rated partitions for protection of
data cabling. These conduits shall be provided with a "fire stopping" material
upon completion of data cabling installation.
e. Camera (Security) opening rough -ins shall consist of a 2 -gang steel junction
box with a single gang extension ring. A minimum of a 1" conduit routed from
the junction box and stubbed into an open ceiling area. The conduit stub shall
be complete with a bushed fitting at the conduit end terminating in the ceiling
space.
f. Provide data connections to scoreboard.
VIII PAGING SYSTEM
1. Paging system shall consist of an extension of the existing "Dukane" paging system
presently located in the South View office area.
2. Paging speakers shall be added to the gym, lobby and restroom areas.
IX CLOCK SYSTEM
1. New "Atomic" clocks will be installed in all new Public spaces and gym. The existing
clock system will not be extended to the new and renovated areas.
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc. Page 30
STATEMENT OF PROBABLE COST — ECC /NORMANDALE GYM ADDITION
PROJ: ECC / Normandale Gym Addition
LOC.: Edina, MN
C.M.: KAMW
ARCH: RMA
DATE: 3/18/2005
Schematic
Design
Estimate
BUILDING f :
S.F.=
.1
Foundations andLower'Slab at Boiler
Rm
Excavation - Perimeter Wall Foundations
10,180
sf
3.00
30,540
-Soil `Corrections at Footings
10,180
sf
1.00
10,180
-Step Footings & Misc.
1
Is
15,000.00
151000
7 n = Intenor 1NalI Footings
220
LF
6.00
1,320
Col4 n4Pads - Fxterior
10
EA
350.00
3,500
Column Pads - Interiors
8
EA
250.00
2,000
Misc. Foundation,Excavation.
1
Is
25,000.00
25,000
Footings ' Exterior Wall
360
If
30.00
10,800
" 7, nterior'Footingi'
220
If
20.00
4,400
Misc.1Unyderpinning,
1
Is
20,000.00
20,000
}.�Column`Pads- Interior 3x3:
—
EA
1,100.00
0
Pads - 8x8
10
EA
1,700.00
17,000
Column Pad s - andSteps
1
allw
15,000.00
15,000
n
°, g Foundation Wails
800
SF
18.00
14,400
_ _
Rigid, Insulation @ Perimeter:,
2,100
SF
2.00
4,200
_
V1/aterproofing
2,100
SF
2.00
4,200 mm
mm Foundation Drainage
1
Is
5,000.00
5,000
Subtotal'Foundations
182,540 , 17 93
_...
2 X Substructure
V Slab on Grade;
10,000
SF
4.00
40,000
Plaza's
6,000
SF
5.00
30,000
Sand:Cushon (compactionne'grading)
10,000
SF
1.00
10,000
Misc Infll,
sf
10.00
0
s
Meth Equip Pad
11
Is 1
5,000.00
5,000
=
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc.
Page 31
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc.- Page 32
Risers, @Stairs
135
L
25.00
3,375;
Ramp @
Subtotal Substructure
66perstructure
SF
6.00
0
.
883758
68
3
-Roof Framing kik /Deck
r
Roof Framing Long $panw% acoustical'
2,900
SF
7.00
20,300
7,280
SF
9.50
69,160
=rv'
deck
Misc. Structural Framing
1
LS
10,000.00
10,000
A a
k S te el` Erection,
10,180
sf
4.00
40,720
ank 8'`
sf
10.00
0
ri
Plank'12 "'
sf
14.00
0
Canopy /Overhang Framing
1
Is
10,000.00
10,000"
4
f r_
777
x
1
allw
5,000.00
5,000
. Lintels
„
Lz
d
t3
Stairs';
0
LS
8,000.00
0
s -
Fire proofing
1
Is
0.00
0
..F
Misc Metal Fabncaboris
1
Is
5,000.00
5,000
160;180.
w 1 3
Subtotal Superstructure
__
Extenor;Closu °re
" 4,
Bnck /Insulation
8,200
sf
18.00
147,600
Masonry /insulation
2,100
sf
16.00
33,600
Precast back up
13,000
sf
15.00
195,000
7,326
sf
3.00
21,978
upgrade ..for sandblast Vintenor
"sorry #rim /Blending
w
1
allw
10,000.00
10,000
£ ,Ma
r Perforated Metal Panel'
1,100
sf
30.00
33,000
Galvalume includes
1;725
sf
26.00
44,850F�
, .
Framing�for areas
1,725
12.00
20,700
galvalume
K =
Exterior all"
sf
>'
1
allw
25,000.00
25,000
f: ,
7 -.
ry td its/Overhanas (metal panels)
Storefront with Doors,
Storefront /Windows`
1
allw
5,000.00
5,000
250
2,100
sf
sf.
70.00
55.00
17,500
115,500
}
_
Curtain Wal!
g
sf
40.00
0
Gaulkirig°and Sealants
1
Is
5,000.00
5,000
---JExitsi Single,
OverheadDaors
r Louvers
1
ea
1,500.00
1,500
^ '
ea
3,500.00
00
Is
5,000.00
0
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc.- Page 32
5
ubtotal .; Exterior Closure
_ Roofing
Membrane Roof
Misc Tie-in
676,228
f,
66.43
10,180
sf
4.80
48,864
1
allw
10,000.00
10,000
�Flashin S� � �
g/ S heet Metal
r.0 Roof Access,
_ Reof Blod ing/curbs
- Su6totali- Roofing
Interior Construction
rn CMU Partitions
. � Brick,
Gypsum Walls
Misd 'n an Patch /.minor Renovation
Doors- Single
Doors Double
Acoustical Doors
Coiling., Doors
Allum intenor:Vesti./ nter Storefront
Polycarbonate bnerinsrdegym storefront'
Floors -VCT
- Floors- Terrazzo
Floors- Ceramic Tile
450
If
20.00
9,000
1
alw
5,000.00
5,000
M
450
If
25.00
11,250:
84,114
8.26
3 6
2,812
sf
12.00
33,744
W
1,736
sf
sf
17.00
8.00
29,512
0"
1
2
allw
ea
35,000.00
1,000.00
35,000
2,000
v
;
1
pr
ea
2,250.00
4,100.00
2,250
0
_
1
250
365
ea
sf
sf
2,000.00
55.00
48.00
2,000
13,750
17,520,17
sf
2.00
0
,
sf
12.00
0
- -
752
sf
9.00
6,768
= Floors Wood
6,393
sf
10.00
63,930'
. Floors- Caret
420
sf
sf
3.00
1.00
0
420
Floors- Sealed Concrete
,.
Floors- Colorbd
1,882
sf
6.00
11,292
WaIIs- Ceramic,Tile
v Sand Blast Precast
Paint - Walls
Paint -Doors
Paint Columns
-� Clean old Brick,
;Ceilings Acoustical (Tectum: <V- Line "Panel}
Ceilings - Plaster
1,185
sf
9.00
10,665
-
above
4,676
sf
1.00
4,676'
ea
150.00
0
1
Is
1,000.00
1,000
1,329
sf
1.00
1,329
1,360
sf
3.00
4,080
547
sf
12.00
6,564
Ceilings Gyp Bd�Pamted.
579
sf
10.00
51790
ry
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc. Page 33
C em- a' edPaint6d
99s7, -PP§ '
Soffits
Mlsb.zBloc I' h9vC rlie6ii
j
-bau I -'-'Ik hg,(Int4
"La
6tali b1h over gym, storefrbnts
'"e I s'Laddef
6,3931
sf
2.00
1
Is
15,000.00
1
alw
15,000.00
1
777
alw
sf
3,000.00
28.00
I
Is
8,000.00
55,000.00
3.00
5.00
8.00
2.75
1.00
12.00
2.00
2.80
0.55
0.30
0.20
4.00
0.00
0.70
0.10
0.00
1.00
1.00
LLdumpster, else, despeirhits,hba,: 71 mo 1 20,000.00
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc.
Al -f I,- 'Y I
30,540
50,900
81,440
27,995
10,180
7-
122,160
323,2151 31.75
20,360
28,504
5,599
-T
-5-,054 7-77 A-
2,036
40,720
0
7,126
1,018
0
10,180
10,180
128,777
140,66-0
Page 34
Subtotal rlor,Cohitru,01140
L
L L
� Systems
777
.Conveying
ryElevatioc
Subto tal, EldvabDft,
0
ea-
Meiclianical
.8,
F ire. P rotedtion
Plumbing
10,180
sf
10,180
sf
Piping,
10,180
sf
6.
g, Controls
1 0,180
sf
est/13616nde
10,180
sf
Wntilatidh
10,180
sf
Iiiiii-if-- -Mo6iiin-464
!9
'
'010drical
''-Servic6A.Digtrib6bbn',
10,180
sf
10,180
sf
PowerNVinng/Devicev
Equip -onh 6/M&
10,180
sf
777�777
mergency:Power
10,180
sf
77 EEmergencyI Lighting
g ,
10,180
sf
Lighting
1gr ng
10,180
sf
Lighting
10,180
sf
7r0,
10,180
sf
Clock ........ ..
t lj'
$,ys, ern
10,180
sf
Tdii&6WF%in61PA-
Site - Lighting
Computer, Data
7=
10,180
10,180
sf
sf
10,180
sf
71,
55,000.00
3.00
5.00
8.00
2.75
1.00
12.00
2.00
2.80
0.55
0.30
0.20
4.00
0.00
0.70
0.10
0.00
1.00
1.00
LLdumpster, else, despeirhits,hba,: 71 mo 1 20,000.00
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc.
Al -f I,- 'Y I
30,540
50,900
81,440
27,995
10,180
7-
122,160
323,2151 31.75
20,360
28,504
5,599
-T
-5-,054 7-77 A-
2,036
40,720
0
7,126
1,018
0
10,180
10,180
128,777
140,66-0
Page 34
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc. Page 35
ECC /South View
rr
r'
Middle School
Gymnasium
Additions
• Sc
iematic Design
I
rr
r'
700
sf
55
38500;
,
A,
350
sf
250
87,500
1
Is
20,000
20,000
0
0
�u
0
.0
,
0
0
7...
�:
2458 705 -
.,
1.
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc. Page 36
STATEMENT OF PROBABLE COST — SOUTH VIEW GYM ADDITION
PROJ:
South View Gym Addition
LOC.:
Edina, MN
C.M.:
KAMW
ARCH:
RMA
DATE:
3/16/2005
Schematic
Design
Estimate
BUILDING
S.F.=
1
Foundations; and Lower$labtat Boiler
R_m
_
Excavation = Perimeter Wall Foundations
9,800
sf
4.00
39,200
Soil Corrections at Footings
— - -
Step Footings Misc
Interior Wall Footings`
" - Column Pads:- Exterior
" Column Pads Interior
Foundation Excavation
Foo ings - Exterior Wall
Infer16FFootings
Underpinnng
Column Pads- Interior 3x3
Pads 8x8
-
Column Pads-Exterior and Steps
;. Foundation, Walls
Rigid'l 6sulation @ Perimeter
Waterproofing
_ - - Foundation Drainage
°bt&i('- Foundations,
�� —
Substructure
Slab o mGrade
Plazas
Sand Cushion (compactionne grading)
_ - -- Miisc Infill
Mech Pad
9,800
allw
9.60
94,080
1
Is
15,000.00
15,000
_
-
160
LF
6.00
960
10
EA
350.00
3,500
_ �W
1
EA
Is
250.00
15,000.00
0
15,000
390
If
30.00
11,700
160
If
20.00
3,200
W
_
1
Is
20,000.00
20,000
EA
1,100.00
0
10
1
EA
allw
1,700.00
15,000.00
17,000
15,000
600
SF
18.00
10,800
2,000
SF
2.00
4,000
2,000
SF
2.00
4,000
1
Is
5,000.00
5,000
258,440
27.49;
_
:-
9,600
SF
4.00
38,400
3,500
SF
5.00
17,500
9,000
SF
1.00
9,000
1
sf
Is
10.00
5,000.001
0
5,000
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc. Page 37
..........
Risers @ Stairs
135
LF
25.00
3,375
. .............. _
Ramp @
SF
6.00
0
Subtotal - Substructure
73,275
7.80
7
Superstructure
Roof Framing - Joists /Deck @ CR's
2,600
SF
7.00
18,200
Roof Framing -Long Span w/ acoustical
7,200
SF
9.50
68,400
deck
Misc. Structural Framing
1
LS
10,000.00
10,000
Steel Erection
9,800
sf
4.00
39,200
Plank 8"
sf
10.00
0
Plank 12"
sf
14.00
0
Canopy /Overhang Framing
1
Is
10,000.00
10,000
=
- ...... _... W� .. _
Lintels
1
allw
5,000.00
5,000
- =
_._
.._W ..._
Stairs
300
sf
85.00
25,500
Fire proofing-
1
Is
0.00
0
_
Mist. Metal Fabrications
1
Is
5,000.00
5,000
Subtotal Su perstructure
181,300
19...29
Exterior Closure
! 4
__
.... _ . _ _ .:.
Brick /Insulation
12,675
sf
17.00
215,475
_
Precast back -up
13,650
sf
15.00
204,750
upgrade for sandblast interior
6,600
sf
3.00
19,800
Architectural Precast / Face stone
1
allw
0.00
0
Masonry trim / Blending
1
allw
10,000.00
10,000
Galvalume
650
sf
28.00
18,200
y
Framing for galvalume areas
650
sf
12.00
7,800
Exterior Wall Demo
1
allw
25,000.00
25,000
Exterior Gate (Meth equip. yard)
224
sf
35.00
7,840
Soffits/Overhangs (metal panels)
1
allw
10,000.00
10,000
Storefront with Doors
250
sf
70.00
17,500
Storefront / Windows
160
sf
55.00
8,800
Curtain Wall
sf
40.00
0
Caulking and Sealants
1
Is
5,000.00
5,000
Exits . ._ .,
Double
1
ea
2,500.00
2,500
Overhead Doors
ea
3,500.00
0
Louvers
Is
5,000.00
0
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc. Page 38
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc. Page 39
<'Subtotal -- Exteroor Closure
Roofing
552;665
r
58.79
- -
5
M Membrane Roof
Misc Tie -in
9,400
sf
4.80
45,120
1
allw
5,000.00
5,000
Flasfiing/Sheet MetaC
Roof Access
Skylight
Roof 6166 king/curts
Subtotal Roofing
Interior::Constructio
CMU Partitions
Interior Cast in Place wall
450
If
20.00
9,000
<.
1
alw
5,000.00
5,000
140
sf
115.00
16,100
450
If
25.00
11,250
.
91,470
9.73
r
6..
2,986
sf
13.00
38,818
1,400
sf
19.00
26,600
Bnck
rt
1,082
sf
18.00
19,476
Precasf Benches
Gypsum Walls
Misc Tie-in and Patch
_ _ x
r s =5mgle
Doors- Double
Acoustical Doors
k
= >�
90
1
If
sf
allw
15,000.00
8.00
20,000.00
15,000
0
20,000
2
ea
1,000.00
2,000
3
pr
2,250.00
6,750
ea
4,100.00
0
Coiling Doors
x
ea
2,000.00
0
um interior Vestr..
Floors- Ceramic Tile
4 Floors Colored
285
sf
45.00
12,825
655
sf
9.00
5,895
1,825
sf
6.00
10,950
Floors- Porcelain Tile!
sf
8.00
0
:Floors -Wooii
Floors- Seated'Concrete
h
r, °Walls Ceramic Tite
6,290
sf
10.00
62,900
11 7
453
sf
0.50
227
950
sf
10.00
9,500
-
s
'Paint - Walls'
Paint �- Doors
5,380
sf
2.00
10,760
ea
150.00
0
_.
Sand Blast Precast
Ceilings Acoustical
Ceilings Gyp Bd Painted
Ceilings - Plaster;
Ceilings Exposed Painted
:'Painted Gyp
above
1,815
sf
sf
1.60
8.00
0
14,520
655
6,290
sf
sf
12.00
2.50
7,860x
15,725
{"
:.
1,850
sf
3.00
59550
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc. Page 39
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc. Page 40
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc. Page 41
ECC /South View Middle School Gymnasium Additions. Schematic Design
Ro ebo m Mme Architects, |n . Page 42
wr
777
Me ..z«
ma e
.
/k bh.
1
Is /\
16,000-
«\ :16000
^
«2«
«��:�
s oo a k.
450
sf
250
. 112,500
Cao�\ §1 I
2;00
^;20402
� � � � , .. ..
.
.
°.
-
« «2
. \ .
\.� 0
0
0^
O
O
.
:: ...
. ..
.....
.., .«?
kn §p& \\ \
/ \
48,500-:,-;
y>.. ..
24713 ƒ \,
Ro ebo m Mme Architects, |n . Page 42
0
I I
SYNTHETIC
TURF ENTRY
I I IN go mu
EAST LOT] n
I ENT
— tol ldl W F d 11111111 0
COMMUNITY c �M
CENTER lot
- A. �. l._.' GYM
—: t ADDITION
d ® iI
ENTRY ryq i
n
DR
OP �YNa•
ADDITION
S�
PLAZA
1
I
0'
,
1
' 17 •
it
•
PARKING INFORMATION:
PARKING LOT EXIST!NG # OF STALLS
JI r
NORTH LOT 88 STALLS
r
•t r
�
i '
•`
O*
r /
s
'
SOUTHVIEW LOT 148 STALLS
s •
r � •
.s•
-
1
I
0'
,
1
' 17 •
it
•
�u
❑�
•
r
I
00
� I
I
I - I
SOUTH VIEW O'
I
MIDDLE °
SCHOOL � 0.
Q •'
F I
I
SOUTHVIEW LOT I
0' I
I
•o I
xv I
Uh I••+ am .d I
�tl���Its1III��M \O I
\ I
LLJ
I
t I �
_E01 z
L�J
I
I
I Q
I
I
I
\ I
I
BAS \ I
I / '
I �
I
I U
I U
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
PARKING INFORMATION:
PARKING LOT EXIST!NG # OF STALLS
NORTH LOT 88 STALLS
KEY
SOUTH LOT 181 STALLS
EXISTING BUILDING
EAST LOT 174 STALLS
SOUTHVIEW LOT 148 STALLS
PROPOSED BUILDING
FRONT LOT 10 STALLS
TOTALS 601STALLS
•
•
•
FIE
D
o
•
s
e
•
•
�u
❑�
•
r
I
00
� I
I
I - I
SOUTH VIEW O'
I
MIDDLE °
SCHOOL � 0.
Q •'
F I
I
SOUTHVIEW LOT I
0' I
I
•o I
xv I
Uh I••+ am .d I
�tl���Its1III��M \O I
\ I
LLJ
I
t I �
_E01 z
L�J
I
I
I Q
I
I
I
\ I
I
BAS \ I
I / '
I �
I
I U
I U
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
PROPOSED # OF STALLS
88 STALLS
204 STALLS
218 STALLS
155 STALLS
10 STALLS
675 STALLS
22 DROP OFF SPACES
PARKING INFORMATION:
PARKING LOT EXIST!NG # OF STALLS
NORTH LOT 88 STALLS
KEY
SOUTH LOT 181 STALLS
EXISTING BUILDING
EAST LOT 174 STALLS
SOUTHVIEW LOT 148 STALLS
PROPOSED BUILDING
FRONT LOT 10 STALLS
TOTALS 601STALLS
PROPOSED # OF STALLS
88 STALLS
204 STALLS
218 STALLS
155 STALLS
10 STALLS
675 STALLS
22 DROP OFF SPACES
MEN= I
r STORAGE
332 SF
ga a LINE OF ROOFTOP
MECHANICAL UNIT
�s d; + T ENCLOSURE ABOVE
RN E
$ 906
�4 I
LT �—
T125=
JAN. CONCESSIONS
'200 SF
� I
- - - - - --
I I
I 1
I 1
LOBBY
_ 1720 SF
I I
I
TLT V S .
F� — 122 SF e i
i
i
I
I
I �
e
LINE OF
CANOPY
ABOVE -
0
�v�
EC10 WORKS
X s'
i
WAITING/LOBBY o w7' i 13u F i Y
El
1183 SF SF T2 SF
VESTIBUL r' wM`
o SOCIAL
C WNF. § PRINCIPALS PSYCH EECHi' F +�� `
op
000 0
Y
LINE OG OPV -
-- -- -- -- -- --------- - - - - -- T _
I
I
OBBY
720 SF e
I
I I '
I � I
/0 I I
I �
I
�I
- - - - - -- -- -- --- - - - - -- -- — —J I GYMNASIUM / p/
I 6255 SF
I
ffi
�\
ON
�i
--ry �
�- .
P' p€;
� .- _ % ::.� v�� � � Y . _.., _ � .. -_� .�,�. - •r. ,... . ,�_.,,� ..5 �... .,... ,,.__,.. �� �;�.�;. - �i.n�c,`.' �
PERFORATED METAL CANOPY
ROOF TOP MECHANICAL UNIT
0 s' 1 o 20' 40'
WEST ELEVATION
119' . l'-0
EAST ELEVATION
Iftr . I U
7
-.,
�A lam'
ma - i
M. A1' ?�p•
w9� 14 A.. f�
■
4
®
v ,�,N•
Rozeboom Miller Architects. Inc.
ILM
(e ti
..`'d ..ui` � / !f•'J Ywt^ +!M[+ ` +1 'IC' ^YTib3zP
r.. 111 Ij
EDINA COMMUNITY CENTER GYM ADDITION
f:
f"
ELEVATIONS �OQ
w9� 14 A.. f�
r
4
®
v ,�,N•
7, Y
.... n _ ., . ,. ,.. Q TA you
qq
,.. :, , ,:. .. r....
v,
U
f, L
.1941. .i "ir- i .S-
f
u
K
h
4 < h h
F s
f f:
p
✓:.. ,:_:... ., 5. < :.; e.. ,. .,..... .,.._... ,...:. �.. .n .;,:r..i, t.. ... :vx .Y,.. S,.... .. 2. ., .:,,:.' >%-S. >i` i ;t Exv.
4 as
2 x
1 3
S
,.: ,_ _.
.
' rte.
2
MOM NOW-,
R � r
s, >.w
TWA s,. ..... x
won _S .
t'
s > F
k
k
}
t
^t 7 t
,,�
Y5' ti �tzsra •L,
d y -.:. ,y.2 .xR'+'.'...- :- .'., '1� _•.. ,1'.0 -i. r -at
d
w� k �6
Y
,., _ ._ .r,- , {.... -2 , xw. , <, . c , _za; .. , >. • >s rtrn •+z
S ±X Y
•u".< rY K s <r 7 s
MW
s� �8 S
L.
M0,
x> S.s
v
-..v. , .. , . ,..✓tip. , ..:. w. .✓ ,..« ., Q-.: ..: ... , . ...: .. ,�# .,# J , . .
I rp
,. ,._ ... ✓ r: ,_.,., i., .:,. , � .- .,_. , rry , �. .. ..., ., .�Q. .. - .mac..;., , }�x,.a .. - . _ .,, -„ -.. k ro
.
R.. P.
t
4,, -
�LJ
aR
.. .. c,�,a 1r;4. ..k<--," Y
5 }
`ms`s a 2 6 .
n, �z
O: Y
a t z» a : ➢
,., M .. .v . ..
.. . , „,..a,. .. ate, 4-1—
. ..•v., ....... ... NAM
ANN
ymy_g wvg
$3 tax s ,^ r
F
r� 1 yA
"MEMO"'”"
MO
Wong .
d x
a O.D. O.D.
-m—Quo Yom, e* }j I, fs 'f a"� y � rr. �oA I j 9 4�:• I � ;a '"�
s. z
sic mmj�& Ply
gr
r „ 4
Z
VC ,.
kO " E I
O �; I ,; , �� o o + OD. V-n TO
CIO
s3q a
3
7 + Y,n
too
Pin
q
5
;i
Q
O.D.
F T
4 3
]] Yqc v
v?
�t
E
Y
4
_.
Aa
I, w
�tf
r�
c ?i
n
r .
z
.�a �
s : .
rn`._
tt i
n
r�
y
?ry .
t
a f_Y
wM ,
A.
�, rr
h_v Y
3t{^
Y
�r
v4
c<
SY
5
rd
{{ a
,as _
h
x'
f
r
d
S-
v"
i
fi.
J,E
z +
Q r
» F7 +a ; x 1
r
",-3-
E
c p
0 s is zm as
CROSS SECTION THRU GYMNASIUM
va . ,+o
STANDING SEAM GALVALUME PANEL
LONG SECTION THRU GYMNASIUM
Iff -,a
T.O PARAPET
EL 1354'
B.G. STRUCTURE
-
EL. 130'4r
WINDOW HEAD
EL 107'-4°
FIRST FL OO' R
EL 100'-0
T.O PARAPET
- -- EL 1354'
B.G. STRUCTURE
EL. 130'-0'
T.O. PARAPET
- - EL 120'-0'
_ T.O. CANOPY
EL 112'4'
FIRST FLOOR
- - - EL. 100'-0'
I n�
Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc.
I�II�II��I�II�II�L�I I��Ih .
Si _IUTH VIEW MIDDLE SCH01 _IL GYMNASIUM ADDITI1 JN
BUILDING SECTIONS
3132" = V -0" OO�
�o�.
o @
' �a i'
MARCH 16, 2005 �
__,
!1 EAST ELEVATION
� WEST ELEVATION
APR.19'2005 12:58 952 941 5492 SECURITY DEVELOPMENT #0290 P.002/002
Dewey Johnson
4504 Lakeview Dr
Edina, MN 55424
April 18, 2005
RE: NEW GYMPS
Dear Mayor Hovland, Council Members, and Edina Planning Dept.:
1 have lived in the community center neighborhood for 26 years, and 1 am in favor
of additional mss. Edina needs these facilities!
The pnmary concern of the City of Edina should be to provide a positive
environment for encouraging recreational participation, especially for our children. The
traffic concerns of the .neighborhood association are highly exaggerated. The new gyms
will greatly enhance the community and provide long overdue new facilities.
Please vote in favor of the new gymnasiums.
Thank you.
Very Truly Yours,
Dewey Jo on
AGENDA ITEM: IV.C.
Darlene Wallin
From:. Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 12:13 PM
To: Darlene Wallin
Subject: FW: Gymnasium additions
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Amy Henriksen [ mailto :ahenriksen @novationap.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 11:34 AM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Cc: mtfesenmaier @eschelon.com
Subject: Gymnasium additions
We are unable to be present for tonite's meeting however, we feel very
strongly that more time be taken to assess the risks and impact on our
neighborhoods.
We have 2 small children, and our street is not safe for them to ride their
bike and tricycle, there is already too much traffic on our street. The
cars already go too fast, and there is no parking on either side of the
street during the day.
If we wanted to live by a commercial sports facility, we would live by the
Dome /Target center.
We feverently oppose this plan.
Jason and Amy Henriksen
Amy Henriksen
NOVATION ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCTS, INC.
313 West 48th Street
Minneapolis, MN 55409 -2417
Phone: (612) 827 -8282 Fax: (612) 827 -5378
Email: ahenriksen @novationap.com
Website: www.novationap.com
C.
1
L:,
Page 1 of 1
AGENDA ITEM: I IV.C.
Darlene Wallin
From:
Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent:
Tuesday, April 19, 2005 12:58 PM
To:
Darlene Wallin
Cc:
Steve Lillehaug
Subject: FW: Transportation Commission
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Dan Rectenwald [mailto:DRectenwald @hga.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 12:32 PM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: Transportation Commission
Your summary of the Traffic and Parking study for the new gyms intimates that through the use of on- street
parking, the need will be met. Is is a goal and /or principle of the site and city council to meet the parking
demands of the area within the parking lots?
Daniel J. Rectenwald, AIA, ACHA
Principal
Hammel, Green & Abrahamson, Inc.
701 Washington Avenue North
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
Direct: 612/758 -4564
Fax: 612/758 -9564
Cell: 612/867 -2377
4/19/2005
-VV
Jackie Hoogenakker
From: Amy Henriksen [ahenriksen @novationap.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 11:35 AM
To: Jackie Hoogenakker
Subject: FW: Gymnasium additions
Amy Henriksen
NOVATION ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCTS, INC.
313 West 48th Street
Minneapolis, MN 55409 -2417
Phone: (612) 827 -8282 Fax: (612) 827 -5378
Email: ahenriksenOnovationap.com
Website: www.novationap.com
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Amy Henriksen ( mailto :ahenriksen@novationap.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 11:34 AM
To: edinamail@ci.edina.mn.us
Cc: mtfesenmaier @eschelon.com
Subject: Gymnasium additions
We are unable to be present for tonite's meeting however, we feel very
strongly that more time be taken to assess the risks and impact on our
neighborhoods.
We have 2 small children, and our street is not safe for them to ride their
bike and tricycle, there is already too much traffic on our street. The
cars already go too fast, and there is no parking on either side of the
street during the day.
If we wanted to live by a commercial sports facility, we would live by the
Dome /Target center.
We feverently oppose this plan.
Jason and Amy Henriksen
Amy Henriksen
NOVATION ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCTS, INC.
313 West 48th Street
Minneapolis, MN 55409 -2417
Phone: (612) 827 -8282 Fax: (612) 827 -5378
Email: ahenriksen @novationap.com
Website: www.novationap.com
1
Pagel of 2
AGENDA ITEM: IV.C.
Darlene Wallin.
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 8:22 AM
To: Darlene Wallin
Subject: FW: Additional Gym Construction at South View Middle School C -0502
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: chris wichman [mailto:chris wich @yahoo.mm]
Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2005 12:37 PM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Cc: mtfesenmaier @eschelon.com
Subject: Re: Additional Gym Construction at South View Middle School C -0502
Re: Additional Gym Construction at South View Middle School C -0502
My wife and I both live across the street from South View. Middle School, right across the street
at 5617 St. Andrews Avenue. We both are very disappointed, close to infuriated about the
consideration of additional construction of more gyms at the school. We. both went through
this once before 3. years ago and are greatly annoyed that this is being done again. What is
more upsetting is the fact that this was defeated once before and the money expenditure has
not been voted upon by the public. It is even going to cost 1 million dollars more.
There is a traffic and parking. problem here at the middle school and we as residents take. the
brunt of the problem. Every Saturday and Sunday and in the weekday evenings, my street is
stuffed with SUV's and people cruising around looking for a place to park so they can do the
gym or activity at the school. Every football game, it is worse. And to add to, the problem, .
when there is a football game, both sides of the streets are chock full of cars making it very
hard to get down the street.
If you consider adding a multilevel car park, you may solve your parking problem, but I doubt if
it is cost effective and you still have to deal with the traffic on residential streets.
Now you still have to get all those cars and people in and out of they area, and we. come to
safety. The roads are not designed for the traffic flow. Construction of the gyms will bring in .
more traffic and keep it there longer crowding the area neighborhood. I do not include. the
addtional traffic issue caused by the recent renovation of the swimming pool and auditorium in
the community center. This is residential and I really resent the fact that you are turning into
more of a Lifetime. Fitness Center without a parking lot. Do a traffic study for all the hours
concerned (a proper one, not an experts guess and include the recent improvements to the
school that will bring more people in II). And don't be so hypocritical about this, since the city
is considering traffic calming and redirection for other parts of town, why shift it over here.
These gyms belong in the Braemar area and not here. Get it through your heads that this
neighborhood does not want the gyms, the traffic and the parking problems here. I note the
proponents do not live here and will drive here to use it. I don't see them leaving the cars
behind and walking.
Do not build these gyms. Get public referendum approval and if you must have them, move
4/18/2005
Page 2 of 2
them to Braemar.. What part of NO do you not understand..
Chris and Teri Wichman
5617 St.. Andrews. Avenue.
Edina, MN 952- 927 -8224.
Do you Yahoo!?
Plan great trips with Yahoo! Travel: Now over 17,000 guides!
4/18/2005
AGENDA ITEM: IV.C.
Darlene Wallin
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 8:26 AM
To: Darlene Wallin
Subject: FW: Community Center Complex proposal input
Page 1 of 2
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: morninglory081129 @comcast. net (mailto :morninglory08ll29 @comcast.net)
Sent:. Monday, April 18, 2005 8:25 AM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Cc: mtfesenmaier @eschelon.com
Subject: Community Center Complex proposal input
Hello,
We've lived at the intersection of 58th Street and Ashcroft Avenue for 2 years. We bought into this
neighborhood because we have 2 children, and it seemed to have the ideal sense of tranquility,
security, community, and convenience that we sought. Now these reasons appear to be strongly
threatened by the Community Center Complex proposal that is under consideration.
We've been concerned for some time about the proposed widening of our street from the current 28 feet
to 32 feet, against the wishes of us or any of our neighbors. We, nor our neighbors, have any desire for
a parking bay to be located directly across the street of our home. We've felt for some time that this will
only serve to invite non - neighbors to park near our home, threatening our security. Now we've learned
why the city wants to add more parking to our neighborhood: because of the Commercial Sports Facility
proposal. We feel that we're being steamrolled into something that we don't want to live with, and don't
want to pay for.
We are very concerned about this threat to our neighborhood. Our road widening problem is a strictly a
means to increase the number of parking for non - neighbors, and we are to pay for it. It appears that
the city still plans to widen our street, against the surveyed desires of all of our neighbors. The proposal,
apparently in advanced stages, to build a Commercial Sports Facility at the school complex at the end of
our street involves the construction of 5 indoor sports facilities which will be hosting practices, games,
and tournaments up to 7 nights per week and up to 10:30 PM nightly, with hundreds of additional car
driving thru our neighborhood daily. Traffic impact studies rejected our neighborhood as suitable for
even 2 additional gyms, but the City Planning Commission is moving forward with the plan regardless
of this rejection. Our property value, our neighborhood's safety and security, and our overall quality of
life are all most certainly on the line. Every reason we bought into this neighborhood is threatened,
despite the fact that we've put significant time, effort, and expense into remodeling our house into the
place that we planned to call home for years. We ask the City Council to please reject the proposal to
add any additional gym space to the project already committed to. A more suitable location or split
locations can certainly be found. Please consider how you would feel if this was your quality of life at
stake.
We also ask the the City Council NOT approve the plan to widen 58th Street to 32 feet. We wish the
street width to remain at the current 28 feet, to maintain slower driving speeds and to discourage on-
street parking of non - neighbors. The speed issue speaks for itself, and non - neighbor parking will
compromise our security. Our yards are also at risk. Our front yard, facing 58th Street, is quite narrow
4/18/2005
Page 2 of 2
enough, as anyone driving by can observe. We do not wish vehicles to be driving any closer to our
home than they already are, as it we hear each and every vehicle that speeds by as it is with the current
street width. Our neighbors across the street do not want to lose their beautiful mature trees, which
provide us all with pleasant shade in the summertime. Please consider our quality of life in making your
decision.
We will be in attendance at the April 19 City Council meeting, and reaffirm our wishes at that time.
PLEASE consider our concerns as if they were your own.
Sincerely,
Moira and Joshua Olson
5801 Ashcroft Avenue
4/18/2005
Page 1 of 1
AGENDA ITEM: IV.C.
Darlene Wallin
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 8:24 AM
To: Darlene Wallin
Subject: FW: Gymnasiums in South View and Community Center
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Sessy02 @aol.com [mailto:Sessy02 @aol.coml
Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2005 9:40 PM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: Gymnasiums in South View and Community Center
I would like to have my name added to the list of neighbors that are not in support of the additional
gymnasiums. I feel that the City Council has been trying to jeopardize this neighborhood and continues to not
look at all of the issues. They are not listening to the transportation committee and are taking short cuts in this
area. Let's start working for the entire city and not continue to ruin the neighborhood by the schools.
There is too much traffic for all of the students in this current area. We are already going to add much to the
traffic in our neighborhood just by the additional space given to all of the schools in this area. Concord added
space last year and now we are adding much more space to the middle school and community/french
immersion school.
I AM NOT IN SUPPORT OF THE DECISION TO ADD AN ADDITIONAL GYMS AND WOULD LIKE REVIEW
OF THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS BY OUR CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR.
Sandy Essendrup
4717 School Road
Edina, MN 55424
4/18/2005
AGENDA ITEM: IV.C.
April 17, 2005
Edina City Council: Mayor, Jim Hovland
Council Member Scot Housh
Council Member Alice Hulbert
Council Member Linda Masica
Council Member Ann Swenson
Please take into consideration the neighborhood that you continue to cause great strain on the traffic. I
ask you to consider the information below and take another look into the transportation issues at hand.
We do not want to build a problem that can not be reversed. Safety in Edina should be our number one
consideration.
Why the Edina Community Center Neighborhood Association opposes this plan:
• The ECC neighborhood was identified as a significant traffic problem area in 1999 ...nothing has changed since then, except the
addition of more traffic!
• The two additional gyms were added to construction plans after last year's referendum was passed ... with a no vote by area
Edina residents.
• The city commissioned a traffic study, but the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) unanimously rejected the study as
flawed. Yet, the City Planning Commission and City Council are going ahead, ignoring the Transportation Commission's
rejection.
• The flawed study looked at the effect of the two new gyms only ... not the impact of what would become 5 indoor sport areas that
could host as many as 7 concurrent school or city- sponsored practices, games, or tournaments drawing even more traffic through
one concentrated area ... our neighborhood.
• In the study, only 2 practices or games per gym, per night, were assumed. The original rental plan presented to Council, projected
6 practices or games in one gym, 4 in the other, each night! Again, this will add significantly more traffic than the study projects.
• Original plans did not include weekend tournaments ... that's changed, along with a concession stand in the revised plan. Events
will start as early as 4pm and end as late as 10:30 pm, 7 days a week.
• For weekend tournaments, the study's projections are considerably lower than they should be ... again, because it considers only
the 2 additional gyms.
• The study ignored the impact of other activities on traffic flow that will increase with the renovations at Southview and the
Community Center (theatre, music, other rec programs) that will of course grow as time goes on.
• The study considered the effect of traffic on a very limited area. Increased traffic on Valley View Rd. was not even considered
relevant.
Please make your decision based on the traffic and not on personal desires.
Tha�k AEssen ou LL el
San y ru p
4717 School Road
Edina, WIN 55424
AGENDA ITEM: IV.C.
April 17, 2005
Edina City Council: Mayor, Jim Hovland
Council Member Scot Housh
Council Member Alice Hulbert
Council Member Linda Masica
Council Member Ann Swenson
Again you continue to target the same small area of Edina for public use. We have lived in this
neighborhood for over 20 years and feel that we and most other neighbors have been excellent hosts for
many sports and school events year after year. Now with the addition of new facilitates to the Community
Center and South View we will deal with more. When it was just Edina student and parents we were
willing to continue to be good neighbors. However, the "game" has now changes with the city wanting to
add facilities that will be open for general use. Please seriously consideration that you continue to cause
great strain on the traffic and general congestion in this neighborhood. We have been pushed as far as we
can and are now ready to "fight back ". I am asking you to do your job and consider the information
below and take another look into the issues at hand. We do not want to build a problem that can not be
reversed. Neighborhood safety in Edina should be your number one consideration not finding ways to
make room for commercial sports facilities next to our schools and homes. We feel strongly enough about
this to personally "beat the pavement" before the next elections if it appears we have elected officials who
are not interested in our families and neighborhoods welfare.
Why the Edina Community Center Neighborhood Association opposes this plan:
• The ECC neighborhood was identified as a significant traffic problem area in 1999 ...nothing has changed since then, except the
addition of more traffic!
• The two additional gyms were added to construction plans after last year's referendum was passed ... with a no vote by area
Edina residents.
• The city commissioned a traffic study, but the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) unanimously rejected the study as
flawed. Yet, the City Planning Commission and City Council are going ahead, ignoring the Transportation Commission's
rejection.
• The flawed study looked at the effect of the two new gyms only ... not the impact of what would become 5 indoor sport areas that
could host as many as 7 concurrent school or city- sponsored practices, games, or tournaments drawing even more traffic through
one concentrated area ... our neighborhood.
• In the study, only 2 practices or games per gym, per night, were assumed. The original rental plan presented to Council, projected
6 practices or games in one gym, 4 in the other, each night! Again, this will add significantly more traffic than the study projects.
• Original plans did not include weekend tournaments ... that's changed, along with a concession stand in the revised plan. Events
will start as early as 4pm and end as late as 10:30 pm, 7 days a week.
• For weekend tournaments, the study's projections are considerably lower than they should be ... again, because it considers only
the 2 additional gyms.
• The study ignored the impact of other activities on traffic flow that will increase with the renovations at Southview and the
Community Center (theatre, music, other rec programs) that will of course grow as time goes on.
• The study considered the effect of traffic on a very limited area. Increased traffic on Valley View Rd. was not even considered
relevant.
Please seriously consider these facts, do appropriate studies and consider the children who go to school and
families who live in this neighborhood. Given the limited road space and options available once a decision has been
made to add these facilities it will be very difficult to "fix" after the fact.
Thank You or your onsideratiou,
Bill Essen rup
4717 Sehool Road
Edina, MN 55424
Proposed new gyms Page 1. of 1
Darlene Wallin
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 12:51 PM
To: Darlene Wallin
Subject: FW: Proposed new gyms
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: DAVID KRASNO /5236 [mailto:davidkr @omnicell.com]
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 11:47 AM
To: Jackie Hoogenakker; Jennifer Bennerotte
Cc: mtfesenmaier @eschelon.com
Subject: Proposed new gyms
I do not know what makes me more upset about the proposed plan to add 2 more gyms to the Community Center
complex... the fact that it is even being considered at the expense of the safety of our children living near the
project or the fact the Council has tried to use Stealth tactics to get it through.
If more gyms are truly needed, build them at Braemar where they have space and where the add'I traffic will not
affect a neighborhood like ours. We are about to get enough additional traffic with the completion of the school
addition.
Because of few stop signs, curry streets and no sidewalks, this is a tricky enough neighborhood to navigate for
ourselves and would be worse for people from other areas.
went along with the school addition but will no longer vote for members who push for this ill fated project.
Sincerely,
David Krasno
5607 Dalrymple Rd.
4/18/2005
rare 1 VI 1
Jackie Hoogenakker
From: Jensens gensens @tcinternet.net]
Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2005 1:56 AM
To: Jackie Hoogenakker
Subject: Proposed New Gymnasiums - Count 4 against
Hello there,
We are property owners near the Edina Community Center & Southview Middle School Campus. We received
the Notice of Public Hearing for Tuesday, April 19, 2005 to discuss proposed two new proposed gymnasiums to
the campus. We are unable to attend that hearing, so in lieu thereof, we offer the following comments:
My wife and I and our two college -age adult children are very much against the building of the new gyms at
Southview and the Community Center. Ther is already too much activity and traffic on our street and in our
formerly quiet neighborhood. We can't help but feel that there must be a better place to add gym space (if it were
truly necessary), and that this proposal was ramrodded through without much thought to the people who live in
the area.
Sincerely - the Jensens at 5705 Concord Ave.
PS - my wife adds - after months of being awakened by heavy trucks and construction noise, enough already(!)
4/18/2005
Case File C -05 -2: Gyms at ECC and South View
Jackie Hoogenakker
From: Mike Klein [fhe_Klein_Family @att.net]
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 10:02 PM
To: Jackie Hoogenakker
Subject: Case File C -05 -2: Gyms at ECC and South View
Page 1 of 1
As property owners living within 500 feet of the two proposed gyms, we want to express our deep concerns with
the project. We've lived at our present address since 1990. The existing use overtaxes the available parking at
the ECC and at South View Middle School. The recent expansion of South View appears to have provided some
additional parking, but this only takes the situation from extremely severe, back to perhaps just severe. It does
not provide truly adequate parking for the current use, and any expansion would further aggravate the situation.
A comprehensive traffic report that takes into account all of the facilities on the site, and their overlapping uses,
would certainly bear out this point.
While there may be a need to provide additional gyms in the city, and while the Community Center may be a
convenient location for such facilities, the plain fact is that the site cannot support additional parking or additional
traffic. Anyone living in our neighborhood for even a brief time discovers this undeniable fact very quickly.
Anyone using the ECC facilities on a busy night, knows what it's like.
The parking issue is merely a major inconvenience, when compared to the greater issue of life safety. Even
without the addition of two new gyms, there are major traffic hazards which exist primarily along South View
Lane. Cars parked along the south side of the street during South View Middle School or ECC events make it
extremely difficult for those driving along South View Lane to see pedestrians who try to cross the street. Adults
and children emerge from between parked cars (and yes, acknowledged that they are jaywalking) and risk being
run over. In addition, the parked cars also block the vision of drivers emerging from the parking lots onto South
View Lane, resulting in frequent near - collisions with oncoming traffic. I have no information on the number of
actual accidents that occur, but I would be interested to hear these statistics from the police department.
The additional traffic from two proposed gyms poses a significantly increased risk to public safety, and we urge
the Planning Department and the City Council to reject this project in its current location. Perhaps a better
location could be found where the traffic could be better tolerated, and the ingress /egress traffic layouts could be
better designed to minimize the safety risks.
Respectfully submitted,
Mike Klein and Sue Klein
5901 Ashcroft Avenue
Edina, MN 55424
Mike's Cell: (952) 270 -9469
Home: (952) 927 -5900
Email: The Klein Family@att.net
4/18/2005
ragC 1 oI 1
Jackie Hoogenakker 1 v, G
From: Michele Vig [michelevig @yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 8:17 PM
To: Jackie Hoogenakker
Subject: Edina Community Center Gyms (Case File C -05 -2)
City Council Members,
We are writing to express concern about the two gyms currently being built at the Community Center
and Southview Middle School (Case File C- 05 -2). Our main concern with the new gyms is whether the
city has adddressed parking in the design plans of the new gyms.
There are already many nights and weekends where the residential streets near the school
and community center are filled with vehicles. Where will the users of the two new gyms park? Was
parking considered in the design of these gyms?
We understand the need for additional recreational facilities for the city and the school district and even
support using tax payer dollars to pay for them. However, as Edina taxpayers, we do not feel residential
streets should be the designated parking spots for the users of the two new gymnasiums.
We appreciate you taking the time to read about our concerns as we are not able to attend the public
hearing on Tuesday, 'April 19. We would, however, like our comments added to the record. Thank you.
Regards,
Dan Mueller & Michele Vig
5614 Sherwood Avenue
Edina, MN 55424
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business -.Try our new resources site!
4/18/2005
rage i oz i
Jackie Hoogenakker I
From: DCorbett @birchlabs.com
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 10:09 AM
To: Jackie Hoogenakker
Cc: mtfesenmaier @eschelon.com; rwenaas @usfamily.net
Subject: Proposal for additional gymnasiums
Dear Sirs,
We are home owners at 5616 Dalrymple Road, corner house across the street from the new addition to the
school that I stare at in amazement every day. I still cannot believe that was O.K.'d considering the traffic we
have put up with the last soon to be twenty years.
At present our house is for Sale. Our house was priced for "Quick Sale" and we were looking forward to
downsizing this year. It took only the initial run thru for the realtors to point out the existing traffic and "eyesore"
across the street meant even lower pricing if we expect to sell. I cannot tell you how many comments we have
had saying "love the house and yard but way to much traffic for comfort." This attitude is hard to combat when
people are pulling into our driveway to turn around like we are part of the school property as people are looking at
the house.
We have actually seen: times we could not pull into our own driveway during football season. What can we expect
now?
I cannot stress my amazement that the City of Edina would take a residential area already overburdened with
traffic from two schools and a community center and intentionally add to the confusion with the plans in progress
at present.
Does the city have our support? Absolutely notl
Sincerely,
James & Donna Corbett
5616 Dalrymple Rd.
Edina, MN 55424
cdc227 @aol.com
The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure. If
you are not the intended recipient, any further disclosure or use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this
message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you think that you have received this e-mail message in error,
please e-mail the sender at the above address, and delete the e-mail. Thank you much.
4/18/2005
Page 1 of 1
Jackie Hoogenakker 1 V
From:
Joanredhed @aol.com
Sent:
Monday, April 18, 2005 11:21 AM
To:
Jackie Hoogenakker
Cc: mtfesenmaier @eschelon.com
Subject: Gymnasium hearing
To Whom It May Concern,
I am writing to express my views on the addition of two more gymnasiums in my neighborhood.
I am very much against adding more traffic and more parking issues to a neighborhood already dealing with a
more than fair share. We've known for years that traffic was a frustrating issue along our street, and that was
confirmed when our neighborhood was identified as having a significant traffic problem in 1999. Nothing has been
done to ease the problem in 6 years.
also understand that there's a belief that we need two more gyms, but I also hear that school population is
declining. Ask yourself what we always ask ourselves as homeowners with budgets. Is this a need or a want, and
what is the priority it is setting? Sports are important, but we keep sending the message that sports are more
important than almost anything else in this community. How does the importance of sports compare with
neighborhood safety, or the sense of quiet community we hope to keep, or keeping taxes down? Again, as
someone who grew up without a lot of money, I also think it's important to separate want from need. There are
some things in this life that it's okay to get along without ... and to work around. This might be one of them. Or
maybe there's a another neighborhood that would like to share some of their green space or quiet streets with the
rest of the city. While we're grateful for easy access to the schools and community center, and we knew it was
there when we moved in, we are now taking on more traffic from new construction already going on, and the
exponential growth that would come with constant and concurrent games and practices at two new gymnasiums
is an undue burden.
My husband and I are in the process of deciding whether to make significant improvements to our home, but now
feel a need to reconsider. Why would we want a front porch to sit and look at increased traffic and parked cars on
our street, when the reason we wanted it was for an increased sense of connection to our neighborhood?
As for the study that was commissioned, I think it's your obligation to us as the people who put faith in you, to use
integrous information when putting a study together. After many years in news, I know that any study can support
just about anything by adding or deleting information. You can play that game and win, but at what cost?
Certainly, reputation and integrity are at stake if you knowingly make an easy decision supported by flawed
information. Edina has a wonderful reputation, and I would certainly expect more from you as its representatives.
Please use all the pertinent information when doing your study and then consider it all when making your
decision.
Thank you for your attention,
Joan Steffend Brandmeier
5605 Dalrymple Road
Edina, MN 55424
4/18/2005
rage i of 1
Jackie Hoogenakker
To: JRA4721 @ aol.com
Subject: RE: Gymnasiums, Case File: C -05 -2
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: IRA4721 @aol.com [mailto:JRA4721 @ aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 7:38 PM
To: Jackie Hoogenakker
Subject: Gymnasiums, Case File: C -05 -2
To: The City Council
We are very concerned over the proposal to build two additional gymnasiums on the Edina Community
Center site.
With three schools, four gymnasiums, athletic field, Community Ed classes, Early Childhood Program and
administration offices already in place, it is not an appropriate location for the addition of two quasi - public
athletic gymnasiums.
On any day or evening, without the current construction hazards, there is considerable traffic congestion.
Parking and access are not adequate to accommodate additional traffic without sacrificing safety for
children and pedestrians.
We strongly urge further study, with consideration to another location, preferably Braemar where:
(1) Acess could be reached from many directions.
(2) Parking would be plentiful with ample room for buses to maneuver in and out.
(3) Where children and pedestrian's safety would not be jeopardized.
(4) Residences would not be imposed upon for street parking.
Please take time to visualize the impact of traffic on a long term basis as it continues to increase ane the
athletic programs also grow.
Mr. and Mrs. James R. Anderson
4721 School Rd
Edina, MN
952 - 926 -9580
4/18/2005
rage i of i
Jackie Hoogenakker I V. C
From: Dan Rectenwald [DRectenwald @hga.com]
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 7:09 AM
To: Jackie Hoogenakker
Cc: Fesenmaier, Maria T.
Subject: Additional Gym Proposal (Case C -05 -2)
I would like to give testimony at the city council meeting on April 19, 2005.
I am opposed to the current gymnasium addition proposal and would like to offer testimony directed towards why I
feel a Braemer Park option would work, over viewing:
a) Programs Needs
b) Planning Options
c) Impact on Parking
d) Impact on Traffic
e) Impact on Cost
f) Comments from the EHA
h) Why this option is safer and offers long term flexibility
I will have some 11x17 diagrams to share.
Daniel J. Rectenwald, AIA, ACHA
Principal
Hammel, Green & Abrahamson, Inc.
701 Washington Avenue North
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
Direct: 612/758 -4564
Fax: 612/758 -9564
Cell: 612/867 -2377
4/18/2005
Darlene Wallin
-rom:
Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent:
Tuesday, April 19, 2005 8:30 AM
To:
Darlene Wallin
Subject:
FW: Safer Alternatives
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Richard .L.Heinrich @HealthPartners.Com
(mailto: Richard .L.Heinrich @HealthPartners.Com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 7:31 AM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: Safer Alternatives
The current proposal to expand to 6 gyms to the Community Center Complex
should be voted down. Further study, alternative placements, and a better
traffic plan needs to be considered. We did not vote on expanding the gyms
in the initial referendum and bonding bill.
Anna and Richard Heinrich
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or the individual
.-esponsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, please
be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any
use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail
is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify
the HealthPartners Support Center by telephone at (952) 967 -6600.
You will be reimbursed for reasonable costs incurred in notifying us.
Darlene Wallin
'rom: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 4:44 PM
To: Darlene Wallin
Subject: FW: Safety in my neighborhood
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Lisa Moeller ( mailto :lisamoeller @olgschool.net]
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 9:40 AM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Cc: mtfesenmaier @eschelon.com
Subject: Safety in my neighborhood
Dear Mr. Hovland and Council Members,
I am extremely concerned about the safety of my neighborhood. We moved to
the ECC (not country club) neighborhood 10 years ago when our first baby was
11 months old. We loved being within WALKING distance of EFCE, the Library
and Church. We have learned to enjoy football season by first walking our
babies up to the game to peek in the fence and now I accompany my 9 and it
year olds inside to watch the games. It is noisy, but fun.
We have learned to adapt to football season and understood football season
before we bought our house. We are not prepared to live in the noise,
unsafe situations that football season brings on a year round basis. After
Football games, we have collected alcohol bottles and cans from our yard and
he frontage road. I have had my front step (door bell included) urinated
on by partying teenage boys .... try explaining that disgusting situation to
you children. We have also witnessed a pedestrain flying through the air
after being hit by a driver during football season. We do not need any more
traffic in our neighborhood, our streets are small and you are risking the
lives of the many small children on our block who like to bike, scooter,
explore and walk their dogs. Currently, people drive very FAST down our
street speeding to pick up their precious children, with little regard for
our precious children.
There is so much traffic in the morning, that I can't even let our 11 year
old daughter walk across Southview Lane to Southview School. I simply
cannot believe the unsafe traffic conditions that are being proposed for our
neighborhood. If there are more gyms, the community center / Southview will
turn into a sports complex crammed /rammed into a neighborhood with small,
narrow residential streets, no main, large roads and inadequate parking.
With hundreds of people traveling into our small neighborhood from
surrounding cities and suburbs our streets and neighborhood will be.put at
risk for accidents, extreme traffic and crowding and exposing our children
needlessly to danger. Really are sports and gyms the most important
priority in our community for- our - children,. What happened- to-safety, peace
and the ability to be a pedestrian? Use your brains, there must be a safer
option for the addition of Sports Space. How about the Braemar area? I can
travel by car to Braemar without even going through a residential
neighborhood. Sports Centers in other communities are not crammed into
existing small neighborhoods.
ks a mother and a teacher, I am concerned about the safety of all children
verywhere. I beg you to reconsider the site and really reevaluate the
situation. If you have children, please consider my children and the
children of the Community Center neighborhood. I would do the same for any
of you. Do the right thing.
Sincerely,
Lisa Moeller
0 Howard R, Green Company
MEMO
To: Craig Larsen; Wayne Houle, PE; Steve Lillehaug, PE, PTOE
From: Steve Manhart, PE, PTOE
Subject: ADDENDUM #1 — Community Center and South View Gymnasium Traffic
Study
Date: March 29, 2005
On Wednesday, March 24, 2005, 1 presented the findings of this traffic study to the Edina
Transportation Commission. This traffic study focused on the traffic impacts associated with
activities and events at the two new gymnasiums proposed in the Community Center and South
View Middle School campus. Following my presentation, the Commission raised several
questions regarding the impacts of the overall redevelopment of the campus on the traffic
conditions in the surrounding area.
Based on these questions, additional information has been gathered regarding the overall
redevelopment for the site, and the resultant impacts this development will have on traffic. Mr.
Ted Rozeboom of Rozeboom - Miller Architects, Inc., project architect for the campus
redevelopment, has provided information regarding elements of the project expansion:
Community Center and Normandale School Expansion:
• A total of 1,800 square feet are being added to the building.
• The lobby for Normandale School is being expanded on the south end of the building.
• No classrooms are being added, and the school's capacity will not be increased.
• A reduction and reconfiguration in seating is proposed in the Art and Music Room from
900 fixed seats to 500 fixed seats.
South View Middle School Expansion:
• The expansion is not adding capacity to the school, but is modifying the spaces in the
school. (The number of classrooms and student population are not anticipated to
change significantly in the future.)
• There is an increase in seating capacity in the theater from 400 to 600.
• The existing lower gymnasium is being modified. The existing bleachers (seating
capacity 900) are being removed, as are the temporary seating areas (seating capacity
250). The lower gym will remain an auxiliary gym with no seating.
• The existing upper gym is being converted to a music rehearsal suite, which better
accommodates the existing programs and uses for this space.
• A new gymnasium planned for the field house expansion will seat 1,036, which is less
than the seating lost from the existing lower gym (900 bleacher seats + 250 temporary
seats = 1,150 seats).
• The existing pool has no fixed seating, but does have temporary seating in place for
swim meets. This pool area is being transformed into additional music rehearsal area.
• A new pool and diving well is being added to the field house area. There will be new
seating for 365.
ADDENDUM #1 03/29/05
Community Center and South View Gymnasium Traffic Study Page 2
The modifications proposed for the Community Center and South View campus area are not the
result of increases in numbers of students — the enrollments at South View and Normandale
schools are expected to remain steady. These modifications represent a general reorganization
of existing uses and overall increases in space, not seating capacity, for various activities. In fact,
a review of the combined seating capacities in the Community Center and South View campus
before and after the redevelopment shows a slight overall decline in seating capacity for the uses
listed above. The existing seating capacity for these combined uses has been 2,560 seats
(including temporary seats). The projected seating of these combined uses after redevelopment
is 2,501 seats.
Therefore, these aforementioned uses will present a minimal change in traffic impacts to the
Community Center and South View Middle School campus area. The same numbers of students
will be using the increased spaces. The changes in the Community Center and Normandale
School do not produce or attract additional trips.
As a result, the two new gymnasiums discussed in the original report become the more decisive
trip generators for the study area. It will be the activities scheduled for these two new gyms that
will create increased traffic to and from the campus, not the elements of the redevelopment listed
above. Therefore, the investigation and findings presented in the original report reflect the more
critical impacts to traffic to streets in the study area.
It may be argued that the campus redevelopment listed above will intensify the traffic if events and
activities in the theater or pool areas are scheduled simultaneously with activities in the new
gyms. In an earlier conversation with Doug Johnson of the Edina School District, it was
acknowledged that the scheduling of simultaneous events would put pressure on parking in the
area. Mr. Johnson stated that the school district will be mindful of previously scheduled events in
the gymnasiums, and would avoid scheduling simultaneous events in the theater or pool areas.
In summary, the critical traffic generators for the site will be. the two new gymnasiums and not the
redevelopment of the other areas in the campus. The Community Center and Normandale
School expansion will not increase the number of classrooms, nor will it increase activity areas.
The South View Middle School expansion will redistribute activity space within the school, but will
not reflect increases in numbers of students. The overlap of events will generally not occur as
indicated by the school district. Therefore, the analysis and findings of the original report present
the most critical impacts to the surrounding street system.
CADocuments and Settings \dwallin \Desktop\3 -29-05 Addendum Traffic Study.doc
0 Howard R. Green Company
MEMO
To: Craig Larsen; Wayne Houle, PE; Steve Lillehaug, PE
City of Edina, MN
From: Steve Manhart, PE, PTOE
Subject: Community Center and South View Gymnasium Traffic Study
Date: March 16, 2005
Introduction
The City of Edina and Edina Public Schools have undertaken a project to expand the Edina
Community Center and South View Middle School on the Community Center campus located
south of Southview Lane between Concord Avenue and Normandale Road. These expansions
include building additions coupled with a parking lot expansion and reconfiguration. Of particular
interest to the City and the School District is the addition of two new gymnasiums — one adjacent
to the Edina Community Center and one at South View Middle School.
Per City request, Howard R. Green Company (HRG) has been authorized to conduct a review of
the internal and off -site traffic and parking impacts associated with the construction of these two
new gymnasiums. Specifically, the goal of this study is to determine whether the proposed
gymnasiums will adversely impact the traffic and parking in the area.
This analysis shows that traffic and parking demand increases with the construction of the new
gymnasiums. Nevertheless, the study shows that the increased traffic will not adversely impact
the capacity of the roadways in the study area. Furthermore, upon completion of the proposed
parking lot modifications, the on- street and off - street parking supply will adequately serve the
daytime, evening and weekend tournament demands.
Study Area
This study is focused on an area north of 601h Street W., east of TH 100, south of Lakeview Drive,
and west of Wooddale Avenue. Figure 1 shows the study area and highlights the location of the
Edina Community Center campus.
The existing Community Center building once served as the location of Edina East High School.
After the closing of Edina East High School in 1981 -82, the existing building was converted into
the Edina Community Center. Currently the Community Center shares its space with Normandale
Elementary French Immersion School. The Community Center houses a variety of daytime and
evening activities and events, both during the week and on weekends. Approximately 600
students are enrolled at Normandale Elementary School, which is considered an alternate
education program school serving grades K through 5.
South View Middle School has existed in its present location for several decades. Currently, it
serves 1100 students in grades 6 through 9.
Building expansions are underway for Normandale Elementary French Immersion School, the
Community Center and South View Middle School. The locations of the building additions and the
two additional gymnasiums are highlighted. The parking lots are being expanded and
reconfigured near these buildings.
Currently the Community Center houses two gyms — one large and one small. South View Middle
School also houses two gyms. Two new gymnasiums are being constructed as part of this
campus development project. A new City gymnasium will be constructed on the southeast corner
of the Edina Community Center building. Another new City gymnasium will be constructed on the
south side of the existing South View Middle School just to the northwest of the South View
parking lot. The existing gyms will remain in use, even after the construction of the new gyms is
completed.
It is important to note that these new gymnasiums will be in addition to the existing gymnasium
space located in the Community Center and South View Middle School. Each gym will be
approximately 65' by 120' and will not house formal bleachers. It is intended that these gyms be
"multi- purpose ", and thus are able to accommodate a variety of uses.
Existing Land Use
According to the City's Land Use Plan (from March 1999), the study area is "quasi - public"
surrounded by single - family residential zoning. The City's "quasi- public" zoning refers to multiple
uses such as schools, community centers, golf courses, etc.
In this study area, the quasi - public uses include the Community Center, South View Middle
School, Normandale Elementary French Immersion School, Concord Elementary School, and the
associated parking lots, and athletic fields. This land use also incorporates Kuhlman Field, which
serves outdoor sports activities such as football, soccer and track & field athletics. The bleachers
at Kuhlman Field seat up to 8,000 people.
The single - family residential uses in this study area generally refer to single - family homes with
driveways and garages.
Historic and Existing Traffic Demand
Traffic in the study area is split between the trips generated by the residential uses and the trips
generated by the quasi - public uses. Figures 2A through 2D illustrate traffic volumes recorded
historically by the City of Edina within the study area between 1975 and 2004. Figures 2A
through 2C show weekday 24 -hour traffic volumes, while Figure 2D shows weekend 24-hour_
traffic volumes recorded by the City.
These historic traffic counts show variations in traffic volumes over the decades. In general over
the last thirty years, the trend has been upward. For instance, in 1975 the daily traffic volume on
Southview Lane was 1703 vehicles per day, while in 2001 the daily traffic volume was 3675
vehicles per day. Reasons for this historical increase may be based on the changing land uses in
Community Center and South View Gymnasium Traffic Study
City of Edina, MN
0: \PROJ \824960J\Rpt#1- Revised 031605 -Final Draft.doc
03/16/05
Page 2
the area (high school to community center), changes in demographics, and /or increases in
number of vehicles per household.
Also the historical trend has been that the weekday 24 -hour traffic volume is characteristically
greater than the Saturday or Sunday 24 -hour traffic volumes. This is because more work - related
traffic is generated during the week than during weekends.
Figure 3 illustrates the relationship between average daily traffic volumes and levels of service
based on types of roadway. Level of Service (LOS) is a letter designation that describes a range
of operating conditions on a particular type of roadway facility, with LOS -A referring to free -flow
conditions and LOS -F describing system breakdown. The vast majority of roadways in the study
area are two -lane undivided roadways without turn lanes. According to the daily traffic volumes
recorded throughout the last three decades, most study area roadways operate at LOS -A or LOS -
B. (NOTE: Roadway operations in the Twin Cities area are generally considered acceptable
when operating at LOS -D or better.)
Although not field verified by traffic counts, it is assumed that the traffic patterns of the single -
family residential uses corresponds to traditional directional peak hours outbound from the study.
area in the period between 6:00 and 8:00 am, and inbound in the period between 4:00 and 6:00
pm.
There are distinctive periods of daily activity at the schools and the Community Center within the
study area. During the school year, South View Middle School hours are from 7:45 am toy 2:40
pm, and both Normandale Elementary School and Concord School hours are from 8:35 am to
3:05 pm. School related traffic generally approaches the schools between 7:00 and 9:00 am, and
departs the site between 2:30 and 4:00 pm.
The Community Center provides a variety of programs and activities throughout the day and
evening. As a result, the peak inbound and outbound traffic periods are less definitive than the
residential and school traffic in the area.
In the evenings, traffic patterns in the study area vary widely, based on the programs, activities
and events scheduled at each facility. According to the Edina School District and the City of
Edina's Park and Recreation Office, the existing gymnasiums are scheduled for practices on
Mondays, Tuesdays, Thursdays and Fridays between October and April by youth basketball and
volleyball leagues. Ninety- minute practices are scheduled in shifts between 6:00 and 9:30 pm.
On Wednesdays, adult basketball is scheduled between 6:00 and 10:00 pm. Also, there is
demand from out -of- season youth sports leagues (i.e., traveling baseball, traveling soccer, etc.)
for indoor practice and conditioning when facilities are available.
Evening events and special programs may draw a variety of traffic to the schools or the
Community Center. The youth sports activities tend to draw drop -off and pick -up traffic before
and after the scheduled practices, as well as traffic from coaches or others.
On selected weekends between October and April, there are tournaments that draw teams,
coaches and parents from surrounding communities for games. Leagues that host tournaments
include the Edina Basketball Association and Edina Girls Traveling Basketball Association.
Community Center and South View Gymnasium Traffic Study
City of Edina, MN
0: \PROJ \824960J\Rpt#1- Revised 031605 -Final Draft.doc
03116105
Page 3
In general, these evening and weekend programs and activities do not adversely impact traffic
volumes on the roadways to degrade the levels of service below a LOS -B. In most cases, the
existing levels of service on these roadways stay at LOS -A (i.e., fewer than 3000 vehicles per
day.)
Existing and Proposed Parking Supply
On- Street Parkin
Figure 4 shows the existing on- street parking regulations within the study area. On- street parking
is allowed along the south side of Southview Lane, but not along the north side of the street.
There is room for approximately 33 vehicles to park along the south side of Southview between
Normandale Road and Concord Avenue. Normandale Road, west of Normandale School is
signed for bus parking only Monday through Friday from 8:00 am to 6:00 pm.
Many streets north of the Community Center and South View Middle School have parking
prohibitions, especially during school hours. St. Andrews Avenue, Dalrymple Avenue and
Sherwood Avenue restrict parking on the east side of the streets at all times, but allow parking on
the west side of the streets at times other than 8:00 am to 6:00 pm Mondays through Fridays.
Under peak parking conditions, these streets would each serve 20 to 25 vehicles parked on-
street.
Concord Avenue and streets to the east have no posted parking prohibitions. There are some
parking prohibitions by Concord Elementary, but those are isolated.
Off- Street Parking
The Community Center building and South View Middle School are currently undergoing
renovation. In addition, three parking lots are also being reconstructed and expanded. Table 1
shows the existing and proposed parking supply for each of the off - street parking lots within the
northern half of the study area. Specifically, the parking supply for each lot is as follows:
TABLE 1
PARKING INFORMATION
Parking Lot Existing # of Stalls Proposed # of Stalls
North Lot
88
88
South Lot
181
210 (completed)
East Lot
174 (117 during const.)
218
South View Lot
148
155
Front Lot
10
10
681
TOTAL
601 (544 during const.)
22 drop -off spaces
Source: Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc., and Oslund and Associates, February 25, 2005
Community Center and South View Gymnasium Traffic Study
City of Edina, MN
0:\PROJ \824960J\Rpt#1- Revised 031605 -Final Draft.doc
03/16105
Page 4
The drop -off spaces shown in Table 1 are in addition to the designated parking stalls. The 22
proposed drop -off spaces are located in the looped driveway south of the Edina Community
Center and along the south and east curb lines of the East Lot between the Community Center
and South View Middle School.
In addition, Concord School on the southern half of the study area has two parking lots. The east
lot is combined with the student drop -off and pick up area, and is marked with 38 stalls, but may
hold more if the drop- off -space is counted. The west lot at Concord holds 90 vehicles.
Therefore, the entire study area currently has off - street parking capacity for 729 vehicles. Upon
construction of the proposed parking, the study area will have total off - street parking capacity of
809 vehicles, plus 22 drop -off spaces, as shown in Figure 5.
Parking Demand
Daytime Demand
During the school year, daytime traffic patterns around the schools are well established. Parents
are instructed each school year where to pick -up and drop -off students. Buses are relegated to
specific areas of parking lots and streets. School staff members are instructed where they are
allowed to park. Except for bad weather days, this pattern would seem not to change much
during the school year.
Similarly, the daytime parking demand for the Community Center is fairly constant. Customers
tend to park in the lots to the east and south of the Community Center. Current parking is
constrained on the east side of the Community Center because of construction. Parking is
adequate on the south side.
Field reviews of the study area in January and February were conducted to get a "snapshot" of
the average parking usage in the lots. While day -to -day events and activities may change, the
snapshot inventory of the parking lots was taken to get a feel for the "average" parking demand
within a typical weekday mid - moming. The findings show that most of the lots are nearing
capacity. Table 2 shows the inventory and related percentage to capacity for each lot inventoried.
When the expansion and reconfiguration of the parking lots are complete, the total number of
stalls available in the north project area will be 686 stalls — an increase of 85 stalls. Assuming the
existing demand would remain constant, the parking lot usage would drop to 65.3% during
daytime hours in the school year.
It is important to note that during this field review, of the 33 stalls available for on- street parking
along Southview Lane, only 17 vehicles (or 51.5 %) were in use. In addition there was one vehicle
each parked on Woodland Road and on Concord Terrace east of Concord Avenue, where on-
street parking is unrestricted.
Community Center and South View Gymnasium Traffic Study
City of Edina, MN
0:\PROJ \824960J\Rpt#1- Revised 031605 -Final Draft.doc
03/16105
Page 5
TABLE 2
DAYTIME PARKING USAGE
Parking Lot # Stalls Used # Stalls Available % Used
North Lot
72
88
81.8%
South Lot
138
210
65.7%
East Lot *
121 **
117 (will be 218)
103.4% *
South View Lot
109
148 (will be 155)
73.6% *
Front Lot
8
10
80.0%
Total North Project Area
448
573 (will be 681)
78.2%
Concord E Lot
8
38
21.1%
Concord W Lot
87
90
96.7%
Total South Project Area
95
128
74.2%
* Denotes use of existing parking lot, not proposed
** Denotes usage over capacity due to drivers parked in non - designated locations
because of construction
Source: Howard R. Green Company, January 31 and February 7, 2005
Evening Demand
According to officials with the Edina School District and City of Edina Parks & Recreation
Department, there are several activities that are scheduled in these buildings in the evenings.
Many of these activities are listed in the "Historic and Existing Traffic Demand" section of this
memorandum.
The evening parking patterns are far less predictable than the daytime parking patterns for these
buildings. Nevertheless, another field review was taken of the site to assess the parking demand.
This field review occurred mid -week after 7:00 p.m. in February. Table 3 shows the results of the
evening survey.
The survey also noted whether vehicles were parked on street in the neighborhood north of the
Community Center and South View Middle School. There were 13 vehicles parked along
Southview Lane. There were no vehicles parked along the west side of St. Andrews Road,
Dalrymple Road, or Sherwood Avenue. Also, no vehicles were parked on the streets east of
Concord Avenue.
Community Center and South View Gymnasium Traffic Study
City of Edina, MN
0:\PROJ \624960J \Rpt#1- Revised 031605 -Final Draft.doc
03/16105
Page 6
TABLE 3
EVENING PARKING USAGE
Parkinci Lot # Stalls Used # Stalls Available % Used
North Lot
39
88
44.3%
South Lot
33
210
15.7%
East Lot'
50
117 (will be 218)
42.7% *
South View Lot
5
148 (will be 155)
3.4% "
Front Lot
7
10
70.0%
Total North Project Area
134
573 (will be 681)
23.4%
Concord E Lot
2
38
5.3%
Concord W Lot
0
90
0.0%
Total South Project Area
2
129
1.6%
Denotes use of existing parking lot, not proposed
Source: Howard R. Green Company, February 9, 2005
Weekend Toumament Demand
As with the evening activities, the Edina School District and City of Edina Parks & Recreation
Department have stated that there are several activities that are scheduled in these buildings on
the weekends. Many of these activities are listed in the "Historic and Existing Traffic Demand"
section of this memorandum.
Aside from the programs and activities scheduled for the Edina Community Center, there are
occasional athletic tournaments scheduled for the gymnasiums. For example, on the weekend of
February 4 through 6, as many as 124 teams from 28 communities participated in the Edina
Classic at these gyms and hosted by Edina Girls Traveling Basketball Association. As a result,
participants, coaches and parents came and went throughout the days and evenings.
To assess weekend demand, parking usage was surveyed on the weekend of February 4 through
6. Table 4 shows the results of the evening survey.
The survey also noted vehicles parked on street in the neighborhood north of the Community
Center and South View Middle School. There were 23 vehicles parked along the south side of
Southview Lane. There were 16 vehicles parked along the west side of St. Andrews, no vehicles
parked along the west side of Dalrymple, and one vehicle parked along the west side of
Sherwood Avenue. In comparison, no vehicles were parked on the streets east of Concord
Avenue.
Community Center and South View Gymnasium Traffic Study
City of Edina, MN
0:\PROJ \824960J\Rpt#1- Revised 031605 -Final Draft.doc
03/16105
Page 7
TABLE 4
WEEKEND PARKING USAGE
Parkinq Lot # Stalls Used # Stalls Available % Used
North Lot
5
88
5.7%
South Lot
14
210
6.7%
East Lot *
98
117 (will be 218)
83.8% *
South View Lot
58
148 (will be 155)
39.2% *
Front Lot
0
10
0.0%
Total North Project Area
175
573 (will be 681)
30.5%
Concord E Lot
1
38
2.6%
Concord W Lot
3
90
3.3%
Total South Project Area
4
128
3.1%
* Denotes use of existing parking lot, not proposed
Source: Howard R. Green Company, February 4 -6, 2005
(This analysis does not include the impacts of parking and traffic generated by athletic activities
at Kuhlman Field. It is assumed that those football games and other activities, because of their
nature, create overflow conditions for traffic and parking throughout all streets and parking lots in
the study area. It is also assumed that the City and School District have formulated special traffic
control scenarios to cope with these events and activities, which is outside the scope of this
analysis.)
Parking Analysis
Review of these "snapshots" of parking usage shows that parking demand is most critical during
weekdays while school is in session, and while daytime activities are occurring at the Community
Center. Given the current configuration of the parking lots, the north half of the study area used
nearly 80% of the existing parking capacity during weekdays while school is in session. Upon the
completion of the parking expansions and reconfigurations, the current demand would drop to
65% of proposed capacity.
Similarly, the evening and weekend demands for the north half of the study area was
approximately 23% and 30 %, respectively of the existing parking capacity. Upon completion of
the parking expansions and reconfigurations, the current evening and weekend parking lot
demand would drop to approximately 20% and 26 %, respectively.
On street parking was most critical during the weekend review period, where vehicles were
parked along Southview Lane and along some of the streets north of South View Middle School.
At no time during this review, however, were parked vehicles recorded over the capacity of the
available on- street parking. St. Andrews Avenue recorded this highest incidence of on- street
parking, with 64% of the available on- street parking used.
Community Center and South View Gymnasium Traffic Study
City of Edina, MN
0:\PR0J \824960J\Rpt#1- Revised 031605 -Final Draft.doc
03(16/05
Page 8
During this analysis, parking demand for the southern part of the study area was most critical
during weekdays. The West Concord Lot was nearing capacity at 97% occupied. The East
Concord Lot, however, had available space for student pick -up and drop -off.
Traffic and Parking Demand from Additional Gymnasiums
It has been proposed to add two additional gymnasiums to the current campus renovation that is
underway (see Figure 1). These two gymnasiums will add recreation opportunities to each site.
In addition, these will add traffic to the adjacent street system, and will also add parking and pick-
up /drop -off demand to the area.
According to Ed MacHolda, Edina's Assistant Parks and Recreation Director, these gymnasiums
are to be considered "multi - purpose ". When completed, each gym will house athletic and general
activities. Neither gym will have "traditional" bleachers for spectators, but will have a viewing
capacity of approximately 75 to 100 people. Therefore, each gym will be used primarily for
participant -only activities (such as youth or adult basketball and volleyball) or Community Center
programs or activities.
To account for future traffic and parking demand created by these gyms, typical traffic scenarios
must be developed.
Daytime Scenario Assumptions
❖ South View Middle School uses new gym for school activities. Therefore, no
additional traffic or parking demand projected during school hours.
❖ Community Center uses new gym for multi - purpose activities. Therefore,
assume four ninety- minute sessions during the day. Assume 40 people per
session = 4 x 40 = 160 people throughout day; therefore assume 160 inbound
trips and 160 outbound trips = 320 total additional trips.
❖ Up to 40 additional parking stalls required per session.
Evening Scenario Assumptions
❖ Two simultaneous practices /games per gym = 40 participants, 4 coaches, 8
spectators (many sharing trips) = 30 inbound trips and 30 outbound trips per gym
= 60 total additional trips;
❖ Two sessions per evening (6:30 to 9:30 p.m.)= 120 additional trips per evening
❖ Up to 30 additional parking stalls per gym required, but assume twice that many.
(Up to 60 spaces needed to accommodate change over between sessions, as
participants from early shift leave and participants of later shift arrive. In reality,
pick -up /drop -off areas may accommodate some of these participants, but not
assumed in this worst -case scenario.)
Community Center and South View Gymnasium Traffic Study
City of Edina, MN
0:\PROJ \824960J\Rpt#1- Revised 031605 -Final Draft.doc
03/16/05
Page 9
Weekend Toumament Scenario Assumptions
❖ Between four and ten seventy- minute sessions during the day. Assume 25
people per session (some travel together) = 20 trips inbound and 20 trips
outbound = 40 trips per session.
❖ Four sessions on Friday night for each new gym = 4 x 40 trips x 2 gyms = 320
additional trips.
❖ Eight sessions on Saturday for each gym = 8 x 40 trips x 2 gyms = 640 additional
trips.
❖ Six sessions on Sunday for each gym = 6 x 40 trips x 2 gyms = 480 additional
trips.
❖ Twenty additional parking stalls required per session. Also, assume that there is
turnover in the parking (i.e., all vehicles are not present throughout the day, but
will arrive just before and will leave just after each session).
The traffic volumes shown on Figures 2C reflect the most current weekday traffic volumes
recorded by the City throughout the study area. The new gyms may add up to 440 vehicles per
day (320 daytime and 120 evening trips) into the weekday traffic volumes. This traffic will be
dispersed along the streets in the north half of the study area, especially along the neighborhood
collectors of Southview Lane, Concord Avenue, Normandale Road, and West 58th Street. Figure
6A shows the estimated distribution of the additional weekday trips on the street network.
Tournament weekend traffic would also impact the existing weekend traffic volumes in the study
area. Figure 2D shows the historical and most current weekend traffic volumes recorded by the
City. Typically weekend traffic in residential areas is less than weekday traffic volumes. Figure
6B illustrates the estimated distribution of the additional tournament weekend trips on the street
network.
There was no historical weekend traffic count data along Southview Lane in this area. However,
an average of other weekend volumes versus weekday volumes for streets in the area yields the
following ratios — Saturday traffic averages 61.7% of weekday traffic, and Sunday traffic averages
54.6% of weekday traffic. Therefore, Southview Lane traffic can be assumed from these ratios to
be 2,267 vehicles per Saturday, and 2,007 per Sunday. (Note: No traffic counts were recorded
along Normandale Road between the MN 100 on -ramp and Southview Lane.)
Table 5 illustrates the effect of the traffic added to the system by the gymnasiums. The trips
distributed throughout the system in Figures 6A and 6B have been added to the most current daily
traffic volumes. As a result, levels of service are calculated for these ADTs by using Figure 3.
Overall, tournament Fridays will experience the highest traffic volumes of any time period. Not
only will those days experience the weekday traffic use to and from the gyms, but they will also
experience the evening tournament use, which draws more traffic than the typical evening uses.
Nevertheless, the level of service on Tournament Fridays will remain at LOS -B or better on these
facilities.
Community Center and South View Gymnasium Traffic Study
City of Edina, MN
0:\PROJ \824960J\Rpt#1- Revised 031605 -Final Draft.doc
03/16/05
Page 10
TABLE 5
ESTIMATED TRAFFIC AND LEVEL OF SERVICE COMPARISON
Location
Weekday (including
Tournament Friday
Tournament
Tournament
Evening)
Evening*
Saturday"
Sunday***
Concord Ave. south
1,303 / 1,333
1,333 / 11361
804/860
711/753
of58'"St. W.
A/A
A/A
A/A
A/A
58 St. W east of
1,392 / 1,530
1,530 / 1,632
859/1,063
760/913
Concord Ave.
A/A
A/A
A/A
A/A
Concord Ave. south
2,639 / 2,787
2,787 / 2,877
1,628 / 1,808
1,441 /1,576
of Woodland Rd.
A/A
A/A
A/A
A/A
Southview Lane
3,675 / 3.823
3,823 / 3,913
2,267 / 2,447
2,007 / 2,142
west of Concord Ave
B/ B
B/ B
A/A
A/A
Southview Lane east
3,675 / 3,825
3,825 / 3,955
2,267 / 2,527
2,007 / 2,202
of Normandale Rd.
B/ B
B/ B
A/A
A/A
Note: Blue Numbers denote most current average daily traffic (ADT) volume
Red Numbers indicate ADTs plus new gymnasium traffic.
*denotes Friday tournament traffic added to weekday traffic WITH the new gymnasiums operational
*denotes estimated Saturday traffic using ratio
** *denotes estimated Sunday traffic using ratio
Source: Howard R. Green Company, 2005
Traffic will also increase on Normandale Road, as seen in figures 6A and 613. Unfortunately, the
lack of traffic counts along that facility has precluded the ability.to assess levels of service during
the weekday and tournament weekend periods. However, an estimate of level of service based
on engineering judgment for the weekday and tournament weekend periods would place the
facility at LOS-131 or better.
Regarding parking demand, the proposed parking supply will be adequate to serve the additional
demand generated by the new gyms. Users of the new Community Center gym will use the
South Lot more frequently, where there is available capacity. The East Lot is being expanded,
thus benefiting users of both the Community Center and South View Middle School. The South
View Lot is being reconfigured, and will provide additional stalls.
The most critical time period for the parking supply will be during the overlap of people arriving
and departing between sessions. At these times, the parking supply will (at worst case) need to
be twice the anticipated number of vehicles. In reality, pick -up /drop -off areas may accommodate
many of these trips. Furthermore, on tournament weekends, participants will be scheduled for
games at various times throughout the weekend, so not all participants will need to be at the gyms
at once.
Safety
During this analysis, the morning school arrival period at South View Middle School was
monitored. Traffic volumes along Southview Lane began building after 7:15 a.m. and continued
until the start of classes at 7:45 a.m. ' Traffic was a mix of parents dropping kids off at the school
and those drivers heading to work. Those parents dropping kids off at school would approach the
western driveway at South View and turn into the drop off area where a patrol guard motioned.the
Community Center and South View Gymnasium Traffic Study
City of Edina, MN
0:\PR0J \824960J\Rpt#1- Revised 031605 -Final Draft.doc
03/16/05
Page 11
vehicles forward. There was storage for approximately twelve vehicles in the drop off area. The
parents would drop off their kids, and then exit back onto Southview Lane at the east driveway.
As the time approached 7:30 a.m., traffic peaked and it became more challenging for parents to
find adequate gaps in the traffic stream. At times, some vehicles turned onto side streets to drop
off students, thus creating a safety issue with these students crossing Southview between the
vehicles that were queued to use the drop off area in front of school.
Meanwhile, some westbound drivers not in queue for the school drop -off were seen passing on
the right in order to get to Normandale Road. These drivers created a de facto through lane along
the curb in order to get past the school related traffic.
It appears that many of these safety issues have been addressed within the expansion and
reconfiguration of South View Middle School. The official drop off area will be relocated to the
west side of the new addition. This will allow significantly more traffic to use the east and south
curb lines of the parking lot between the school and the Community Center. As a result, drop off
traffic will be pulled off of Southview Lane during school arrival times, thus providing a much safer
condition along the street. In addition, through traffic will be less likely to pass long queues on the
right to get to Normandale Road. In all, a safer condition will result.
Summary
Analysis of the traffic and parking pattems of the Edina Community Center and South View Middle
School study area have yielded the following findings:
❖ The traffic volumes in the study area have fluctuated through the years, but are
generally trending upward.
❖ The existing levels of service on the street system in the study area are generally at
LOS-13 or better. School days and tournament Fridays yield peak traffic volume and
parking usage periods.
❖ An equitable balance of on- street parking regulations has evolved in the neighborhood
in the north half of the study area. Compliance appears to be high. Parking
regulations are not posted, nor do they appear to be needed, in the neighborhood to
the east of Concord Avenue.
❖ The Community Center and South View Middle School parking lots are currently at an
78% usage rate during the school day; 23% during the evenings and 31% on
tournament weekends. Expansion and reconfiguration of the parking lots will increase
parking capacity at the site, and may result in some shifting of parking preference by
users.
❖ On- street parking is common along the south side of Southview Lane during daytime,
evening and tournament weekend periods. In evenings and on weekends, on- street
parking becomes common along the west side of St. Andrews Avenue, but at no point
in the review did on- street parking demand meet or exceed capacity. No other street
Community Center and South View Gymnasium Traffic Study
City of Edina, MN
0:\PR0J \824960J\Rpt#1- Revised 031605 -Final Draft.doc
03/16/05
Page 12
in the neighborhood experiences the same level of on- street parking frequency, as
does St. Andrews.
❖ Levels of service on the streets in the study area will not degrade appreciably as a
result of the addition of the two new gymnasiums. The distribution of the added trips
indicates that the roadways in the study area will remain at the same levels of service
as before the completion of the new gyms. This was true for weekday and
tournament weekend scenarios.
Conclusion
The goal of this study has been to determine whether the proposed gymnasiums will adversely
impact the traffic and parking in the area. The levels of service on the streets within the study
area will not degrade appreciably as a result of the addition of the two new gymnasiums. Upon
completion of the proposed parking lot changes, the on- street and off - street parking supply will
adequately serve the daytime, evening and tournament weekend demands.
Community Center and South View Gymnasium Traffic Study
City of Edina, MN
0:\PROJ \824960J\Rpt#1- Revised 031605 -Final Draft.doc
03116(05
Page 13
References:
1. Land Use Plan Map, City of Edina Transportation Plan, City of Edina, MN, March
1999.
2. Existing Traffic Volumes Map, City of Edina Transportation Plan, City of Edina,
MN, March 1999.
3. Forecast 2020 Daily Traffic Volumes Map, City of Edina Transportation Plan, City
of Edina, MN, March 1999.
4. Functional Classification Map, City of Edina Transportation Plan, City of Edina,
MN, March 1999.
5. Pedestrian /Bicycle Facilities Map, City of Edina Transportation Plan, City of
Edina, MN, March 1999.
6. Traffic Analysis Zones Map, City of Edina Transportation Plan, City of Edina, MN,
March 1999.
7. Parking Restrictions Map, data accumulated by City of Edina, MN, February
2005.
8. Historical Traffic Volumes, 1975 -2004, data accumulated by City of Edina, MN,
February 2005.
9. ECC /Normandale Elementary School Gym Addition Floor Plan, Rozeboom - Miller
Architects, February 2005.
10. South View Middle School Gymnasium Addition Floor Plan, Rozeboom - Miller
Architects, February 2005.
11. Edina Community Center /South View Middle School Site Plan, Rozeboom - Miller
Architects, February 2005.
12. Phone conversations with Doug Johnson, Edina School District, 01/31/05 and
02/02/05.
13. Phone conversation with Ed MacHolda, Edina Assistant Parks & Recreation
Director, 02/01/05.
14. City of Edina Local Traffic Task Force Findings and Recommendations, May 6,
2003
15. 2005 Edina Park & Recreation Insider, City of Edina, 2005.
16. Edina Basketball Association website, www.edinabasketball.com
17. Edina Girls Athletic Association website, www.egaa.org
18. Girls Traveling Basketball website, www.edinagirlsbasketball.org
19. Edina School District website, www.edina.k12.mn.us
20. City of Edina website, www.ci.edina.mn.us
21. "Campus Traffic and Parking" HRG Memo to Jay Willemssen, Edina Public
Schools, from Howard Preston, PE, and Chris Albrecht, July 31, 2000.
22. 2003 Official City Map of City of Edina
23. Field checks of study area, Howard R. Green Company, 01/31/05; 02/05/05;
02/06/05; 02/09/05; 03/03/05.
Community Center and South View Gymnasium Traffic Study
City of Edina, MN
0:%PR0J1824960JXRpt#1- Revised 031605 -Final Draft.doc
03116105
Page 14
Figures
1. Study Area
2A. Weekday 24 -Hour Traffic Volumes (1975 -1984)
2B. Weekday 24 -Hour Traffic Volumes (1985 -1994)
2C. Weekday 24 -Hour Traffic Volumes (1955 -2004)
2D. Weekend 24 -Hour Traffic Volumes
3. General Roadway Levels of Service
4. Parking Restrictions
5. Proposed Parking Lot Availability
6A. Estimated Additional Weekday Traffic
6B. Estimated Additional Traffic on Tournament Weekends
Community Center and South View Gymnasium Traffic Study
City of Edina, MN
0:\PROJ\824960J\Rpt#1- Revised 031605 -Final Draft.doc
03/16(05
Page 15
4� y'
N r T r
M
4 '
6 � � � ,�' } 1 j_ �a t���Yi! . � *a.r r`` `l.. y tiKA ••k- �,,•
• '� �{ t1 x
�� � + � i.-sy f r `.� '; ,pe 4 '� 'tea z ,�y .. ►v � '�� �,.: _
y's- a�� k 'V � '"4;,I q f� � i , YI �.�'F� 3f � ,uy�•'�; {.�� *c.ii~
• i
• -
f Middle 4 T
- • • # r Jt- "i t 1S yy t •r+' �, r jya� 6 *j} • 1
School
Elementary I
School
Edina if
♦ ♦♦
r
r Y,
i
f j }
Community
Center Z;
4 �
j;`� �, ,� ' _ ��s —u�r ��� t �►_y +�u�`� ire:: �� � "� `�
rte,
Gil. <,... 4 _: • � .,ss Y. "i. :: � b. ��" '�� _ -._� _.��'� � �� !,� `r�
J i
w _ _ - ., � a� d1 � r y � "r ' .�1.1. -•'yam . re..:
l 1'�!, ��t;•i... a � , _ ,. "4 = %'� y' i
Concord
' a + Elementary Vfa
Y ,
5
. , .
�4,.�r. j �! Ra A�b. , {,jrR•_{ ,ice #�l ,f ."M..- air � y {� �%� T'+ - '�?��`. � ,
Legend
Building Addition
Proposed Gymnasiums i
ID Parking Lot
Source: City of Edina, Minnesota
a 4
/
q�
Y }, e'' • Lo •'a�i!'��� ii �c 6 aE� . _ � ..s�.�_i..�l.�:a�r. "_.:. -. - �L���r.. f� {'+.:��.
- ,- y
RI f � •
� L k �. .-'_ _ - ,� s {�''� � �< .. ►�_i�,�t��1'. ,�'� � to ��—
J 100
lei
�j,
'_' +.�. � � � —' a�•� i ^ eA � J.q AF _i t�r+n L - b� - ; r.. � � J-. � � ..
Q •
Q � } t � - L �� .fir• ' f4y� kq� !'"Sc' �f ..,�
j - r s y •
1. _` y. ; F "' ° .1� ,� .+: Jr` ` ail ti' Y'`•7�` 4 i .%i�' - a .' rdd`� � r ' 1 ±'L * Ea >
a : ,
c,�� 4' 4 .F. TAN s#r�� ~`-3'i -,r -� _trM' '...•••^^^...
1975 1900
1979 - 2773
yes
T 7 77-
1981 - 1833
yt -
, 1983 - 1759
s ( <z� — '
> 4�' ■i
-7 lwv
1975 - 157
n ,
tu`S
ti 'l a�n3 �i9J� 7
1979 - 1339
' •4 t+ '_f r icy^ �..�r— 'ix,
1981 - 1377
It
1 E
r
1 1
r
i q
4 ,
40 1983 - 1415
IL
k
:-WA
ELLS ~ y, � ! �+�, T � ` +�-• , . :� w a � r..•Q�.
- i s f0, ,� .�
3
1 1 79- 1096 1975 - 6290
1977 - 5630
1981 - 1771
• F
_.
1981 - 6300
1983 - 4771
_A e'
Legend
r
_ 5r
Volume
+a7 d 'z is *sue
�'
n
Source*
A-
N
�_r
,41,
MITI,
tit -A
Y
'1
-W
1985 - 420'
1987-403
1989-454,
1991 -429.
L_ A 1993 - Al Ai
.44
oil, ;r
4 t
4 A
Ir
L jm
L
1985-1220
f.
1987-1339
1989-1578
Fj
1 991 -1580
1993-1664
ter: ' ' ��` � 4�1. ° � . ,1 �
tit
7�
A
J
JAMM
Jp
Ito
1985 - 1150
7, 1987 - 520
1989 - 913—
1991 - 733
OL -
Al_,lil
RK y
N
1
n ,
t
1 1
r — o
<� h
Y
r
r.
-V'LI
�G
w .. 1 "
201
30 -
n �
AFT
+k will
Ilk
wl
2004 387
-
i
Y_ y
A
+ r
.i. '
• q
1995 1814
r- �z
y r:
xi
2001 j P
AVA
IA
-V jot
1998- 1900
a
i
Ir
J1 . _ t �
y [+ T i4
IL
Year - ADT Volume Number
Wy of Edina, Minnesota
���Y �lp:i�rri .:L �� ��r'�'i.... itl::.L`.� ,c i'.`i!1'a i:+, L..�• ... .`. �._ _ �3. 'i� �+.,:'s��_..
- —�:
2000 -53
IN
i! 1 1 1
a �
p
�'i ��-� '- w '� _, 'jM�r + � :y: cc..;i r' �! Y �i'� I � v # il ��Y•.t:r� �, �•�o `• � �
Ilk
Ak
740 � !
s� e�'� � `� "4k, � � !�'. fir.• f" ` +i �,�.•y1� j�! .,Idw1�; �� �p., < � ( �1.
+ d
t
F.
log-
2000 ref �°*►.� /
1
J. i X. _� _ • ter. o
i�� I 1 1 `fir � f �" � •1} \`P
� Y �t-:.y • ^�`� 111 �fld y� _ '— {
# 1 1 �� `� �,.a � (� --•� *:E'er' �A�'' ��•- � 1
• y. .y
ej
ILI
I p ti - ~ - 3-D Y j -- *a r$e• -S3n I� i '4J
Re—
T Awi
_ �6 .- k ` _Lai- �� - �`..a. � FFF � i _' � . • A
Legend AIR
1994 .1234 Year - ADT Volume Number,
Ur
Saturday Count
1994 - 1234 Year - ADT Volume Number,
Sunday Count
1'-;! Source: City of Edina, Minnesota 2002 -4050
�-
r3 s e Y ' I.i.•i- x'7"7_ W _��Y s + :<_4t�._r „'.ri
45,000
acity Assumptions: �'�
Los
fThrough Only Lane 800 vph Note: This figure contains
40,000
H Lane 600 vph
RT Lane 700 vph
RT /LT Lanes 600 vph
approximate values. The
values are highly dependant
on the assumptions used. It
..L..E. .
Turn Lanes 350 vph
should not be used for
operational analyses or final
35,000
Peak Hour Percentages cs>
design.
Arterial Roadway 10%
Directional Orientation 60/40
LOS F
Los D.
30,000
(1) Assumes 1/4 mile signal spacing. For
less than 1/4 mile signal spacing, roadway
• • • • • • • • •
.: Lose •.
„ \. \ \,,,,,
becomes too volatile to determine LOS b
For greater than 1/4 mile signal
GADT.
Q
...
25.000
spacing, the capacity for a through lane can
be increased by approximately 50 -100
vplph. '
2 Based on data provided in the Mn /DOT
1998 Automatic Traffic Recorder (ATR)
LOS
:LOSE '
LOS
LOS
\ \ \ \ \ \, \ \ \\
. \\
\\\ Los . \\
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\
•`•
;< dos c,.
•
• <,�>
20.000
Report.
\ \, \, \ \ \ \ \\
'�
D
4%
C:
ci
15,000
LOS F
,,,\,,,\,,,
LOS
• . LOSE • •
\V.......,,
\,• LOS • \\
..... �\
< < <
' >' >' >'•
\ \ \ \ \ \, \ \ \ \
\\\\\,\\\\,
,,,,,\,,,\\
'•� LOS X.
`
>�•� >�•,•,
> <• <• < > <'.>
LOS
��•�•�•�•i•�
> > • >
/i/uuuii
i LOS B
\\\ LOS „
,,,\\\\\\\\
�•�•� >� >�>
� >� >� >�•�.�
LOS B ,/
/iiiiiiiiii
10,000
LOS F
' < >,',•,•,•, .....
LOSE •' '< Los ��<
.:-.LOS <>
> < > < > <> > >
•
//. //
// LOS .., //
/� o'//
LOS B
\ LOS D •.\\
/iiiiiiiiii
/iiiiiiiiii
LOS B ii
' > /v, LOS 8 // /iiiiiiiiii
`> LOS C >'
:;;•LOS A::
5,000
`• > > '
LOS
/ ./.
:;:; LOS A ::y ;:} LOS A :; ; { {:LOS A :: {:: LOS A.<
�
LOS A :::$
0
2 -Lane Undivided w/o 2 -Lane Undivided with R 3 -Lane Undivided with L 3 -Lane Undivided with R
4 -Lane Undivided w/o
4 -Lane Undivided with R 4 -Lane
Divided with R &
Turn Lanes or L Turn Lanes
Turn Lane
& L Turn Lanes
Turn Lanes
or L Turn Lanes L
Turn Lanes
Type of Roadway
Howard R. Green Company
GENERAL ROADWAY LEVELS OF SERVICE
TRAFFIC STUDY
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
FIGURE
3
IN
s.
Lot WL4,
Will
Z
If
Aye N —.k -- — --
*t
. 4.
'17
J4
7V
it
f L
welt-
va j --
^ww _w-
L
AD 4� 40
- x' -
X41 7.
v
401
'W Legend
F41- L7
'e r No Parking Anytime
;,Owl
No Parking, M-F 8 - 6 wj
No Parking School Days
L
1; Bus Parking Only M-F 8 - 4:30
A
15 Min Parking M-F 7 - 6
4ji jv
fill No Parking or Stopping
v
INT MV
No Parking School Days 7 - 9 AM
Nothing Posted
J,
Wf
I iyo inneso a
Source. C't f Edina, M' t 20
so
TUI_7w
1
^ r
r
1
y
North • �' # .. � � � rE y�'• pye r
t
".1. '� �
T
88 stalls As
_
7 le. ': `.r
IT,
, r
b
J.-
T
QC;- Arlo
S•+
I v g
r
•��
t
Ilk-
Lit
P _ '�► , e, r t i 1
drop-off V,
spaces 4�
�T k_ s .
16�'
Concord East Lot-� -
38 stalls
it
Ir Concord West Lot
90 stalls
Legend
z
lair -• -
Lam. ti'.. - r s ; °L --•+ + {.4 t '� �1 �` _,yg_ (1�•i1F.: .'.� _ :'"�.i
k _
100 .{
Ly -
4Z 'M __
j• it a: - �i ply -��..� a. .... Drop-off S.. - ! y,
Howard R. Green Company
a s
� Y¢. '.•a,,, � �.e � ¢,1 � - • sa �Y �4 ��, t ..F �p,r�
yy ¢
,x k
a
A M." P
� Sff I i i;,, A
y
.i
I'M i
LLJ
,
��
` l•� ry . per, .P ��! - ; 1..
' f
x
1 ,� t .. �I , f�� � � _� � �� �� ► Jai`
4
4 1 tea. j.-, .
IL
R
s
f
„
M
j
!
gawk
- --
"1 '-may. • � E` � -�.
�a
-+� k . ! p: a :7 e, rt �`• ;:'�, • it *" 5 1... Sir !�� --•'ti J , .,
Legend
Weekday trips added to system _,6,
+XX Day V� ��.c t' � a t • w -rte , �
P +
_ trips • • '
Evening trips added �,
+XX Total weekday trips aed
.._
Source: - e� -4_
.P
E
MINUTES. OF. THE
Edina Transportation. Commission
Thursday, March 24, 2005
Edina City Hall.
4801 West 50th Street
Community Room
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Fred Richards, Marie Thorpe, Jean White, Warren Plante, Joni Kelly Bennett, Dean Dovolis.
MEMBERS. ABSENT:
Les Wanninger
STAFF PRESENT:.
Steve. Lillehaug, Sharon Allison
b. Community Center & South View. Gvmnasium Traffic Study - Howard R. Green
Company
Steve Manhart with Howard R. Green Company said they were commissioned to conduct. a traffic
study to identify internal and off -site traffic and parking impacts and to determine whether the
proposed gymnasiums will adversely impact traffic and parking in the area of the Community Center
and South View Middle School. The study area is bounded by W. 60th St. to the north, Lakeview
Drive to the south, TH 100 to the east and Wooddale Avenue to the west. In addition to the
gymnasiums, there will be building expansion on South View Middle School and the Edina
Community Center, as well as the east and west parking lot and reconfiguration of South View's
parking lot.
Manhart said they used historical traffic count data dating back to 1975 as well as more current
counts (1995- 2004), provided to them by the Engineering Department. Through data analysis and
observation of the area, the study identified the following:
• Local streets have high access but low mobility; principal arterials have low access but high
mobility;
• Traffic on roadways free flows at Level of Service (LOS) A (LOS -D or better is generally
acceptable in the Twin Cities);
• Relocation of South View's students drop -off location will pull more vehicles off Southview
Lane;
Projected Traffic and Parking Demand
• Daytime Scenario: No additional trip generation /parking for school's gym; 320 additional
trips and 40 parking stalls required for the Community Center's gym (assuming 4 ninety -
minute sessions and 40 people per session daily for multi - purpose activities);
• Evening Scenario: 120 trips created by two simultaneous practices /games per gym
(assuming 40 participants, 4 coaches and 8 spectators); 30 additional parking stalls per
gym, but up to 60 spaces to accommodate change over between sessions;
• Tournament Weekend Scenario: Four sessions on Friday night per gym ( =4x40 trips x 2
gyms) equals 320 additional trips; eight sessions on Saturday per gym ( =8x40 trips x 2
gyms) equals 640 additional trips; six sessions on Sunday per gym ( =6x40 trips x 2 gyms)
equals 480 additional trips.
• On- street parking restrictions seem to be in compliance; most parking are on Southview
Lane and side streets during weekend tournaments, especially St. Andrews;
• Weekend tournament traffic travels primarily along collector streets ( Southview Lane,
Concord Ave. and Normandale Rd.);
In conclusion, the study found that "Levels of Service will not degrade appreciably as a result of the
construction of the new gymnasiums and upon completion of the proposed parking lot changes, on-
street and off - street parking supply will adequately serve weekday, evening and tournament weekend
demands."
Richards indicated that the school should, provide adequate off - street parking since they are
continuing to intensify usage of the area. Plante concurred and stated that the traffic issue should
have been addressed ahead of time and not after - the -fact. Dovolis said usage of the area would
intensify even more when new programs are added and even if they were to provide adequate off-
street parking, the number of trips generated will be an issue. Bennett said the number of vehicles is
unacceptable for a residential area and there has been a lack of communication with the residents.
White suggested creating an alternative transportation system to reduce the number of trips. Thorpe
asked what could they do at this point considering that everything appears to be in place and
construction has already begun. Lillehaug said funding for the gyms is yet to be approved.
Residents in attendance commented as follow:
Julie Risser, 6112 Ashcroft Ave. Risser stated that Valley View Rd should have been included in the
study because it is used heavily when events are over and while the study addressed traffic on
Normandale Rd, it did not address the excess traffic that Valley View Rd will carry. She said Valley
View Rd is a 1.1 miles speedway road with one only one place for drivers to stop between
Normandale Rd and Hwy 62. She said the only designated crosswalk for students at Concord and
Valley View Rd is dangerous because the flasher is on constantly and is therefore ignored by drivers.
She said there is also a 'dip' in the road just before the crosswalk that makes it difficult for drivers to
see an adult crossing, let alone children. She said the sidewalk does not go all the way through and
students must be bused 2.5 blocks from Concord Elementary because Valley View Rd is too
dangerous to cross. She is also not happy with the increased traffic in the area.
Ron Wenaas, 5617 Sherwood Ave. Wenaas stated that he is disappointed that the traffic study only
considered the impact of two gyms and not all four that are planned. He said the operating hours
used in the study is not correct, it should be from 4 -10:30 p.m. which then doubles the traffic study's
assumptions. He said the numbers used to determine trip generations are low and needs to be
reconsidered. He stated that the traffic study should have been done based on what the project is
going to do to the entire community, not just the effects of two gyms. He said the Edina Community
Neighborhood Association implores the ETC to not recommend that they go forward with the gyms.
talph Overholt, 6321 Rolf Ave. Overholt asked how has the Level of Service changed specifically
and are there areas that are more affected than others? He said based on the cost per parking stall,
the School Board should get students to bike or use other alternatives.
` 13ennett stated that the Commission does not have an accurate picture of the impact on the
community considering that all four gyms were not included in the traffic study. Dovolis concurred,
stating that the study does not address all the uses, capacities, functions and future uses. Bennett
said the study should not advance until all this information is known. Plante said Valley View Rd
should be included in the future study.
Dovolis made a motion encouraging a new traffic study that will look at the impact on the entire
community, including future potential of sites and withhold approval of gyms until the full impact on
the community is known. Seconded by Plante.
Ayes: 6
Nayes: 0
Motion carried.
Darlene Wallin
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 8:35 AM
To: Darlene Wallin
Cc: Gordon Hughes; Craig Larsen; Wayne Houle; Steve Lillehaug
Subject: FW: Gymnasium hearing
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Fesenmaier, Maria T. [ mailto :mtfesenmaier @eschelon.com]
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 5:09 PM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: FW: Gymnasium hearing
Page 1 of 2
Jennifer,
Please forward this to Council, Mr. Keprios, Mr. Hughes, Mr. Larson, Mr. Houle and Mr. Lillehaug, for the
4/19/2005 council meeting.
Thanks!
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: loanredhed @aol.com [mailto:Joanredhed @aol.com]
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 11:21 AM
To: jhoogenakker @ci.edina.mn.us
Cc: mtfesenmaier @eschelon.com
Subject: Gymnasium hearing
To Whom It May Concern,
I am writing to express my views on the addition of two more gymnasiums in my neighborhood.
I am very much against adding more traffic and more parking issues to a neighborhood already dealing with a
more than fair share. We've known for years that traffic was a frustrating issue along our street, and that was
confirmed when our neighborhood was identified as having a significant traffic problem in 1999. Nothing has been
done to ease the problem in 6 years.
I also understand that there's a belief that we need two more gyms, but I also hear that school population is
declining. Ask yourself what we always ask ourselves as homeowners with budgets. Is this a need or a want, and
what is the priority it is setting? Sports are important, but we keep sending the message that sports are more
important than almost anything else in this community. How does the importance of sports compare with
neighborhood safety, or the sense of quiet community we hope to keep, or keeping taxes down? Again, as
someone who grew up without a lot of money, I also think it's important to separate want from need. There are
some things in this life that it's okay to get along without ... and to work around. This might be one of them. Or
maybe there's a another neighborhood that would like to share some of their green space or quiet streets with the
rest of the city. While we're grateful for easy access to the schools and community center, and we knew it was
there when we moved in, we are now taking on more traffic from new construction already going on, and the
exponential growth that would come with constant and concurrent games and practices at two new gymnasiums
is an undue burden.
My husband and I are in the process of deciding whether to make significant improvements to our home, but now
feel a need to reconsider. Why would we want a front porch to sit and look at increased traffic and parked cars on
our street, when the reason we wanted it was for an increased sense of connection to our neighborhood?
As for the study that was commissioned, I think it's your obligation to us as the people who put faith in you, to use
integrous information when putting a study together. After many years in news, I know that any study can support
just about anything by adding or deleting information. You can play that game and win, but at what cost?
4/19/2005
s 4
Page 2 of 2
Certainly, reputation and integrity are at stake if you knowingly make an easy decision supported by flawed
information. Edina has a wonderful reputation, and I would certainly expect more from you as its representatives.
Please use all the pertinent information when doing your study and then consider it all when making your
decision.
Thank you for your attention,
Joan Steffend Brandmeier
5605 Dalrymple Road
Edina, MN 55424
4/19/2005
Darlene Wallin
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 8:36 AM
To: Darlene Wallin
Cc: Gordon Hughes; Craig Larsen; Wayne Houle; Steve Lillehaug
Subject: FW: Proposal for additional gymnasiums
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Fesenmaier, Maria T. [ mailto :mtfesenmaier@eschelon.com]
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 5:25 PM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: FW: Proposal for additional gymnasiums
Page 1 of 2
Jennifer,
Please forward this to Council, Mr. Keprios, Mr. Hughes, Mr. Larson, Mr. Houle and Mr. Lillehaug, for the
4/19/2005 council meeting.
Thanks!
Message---- -
From: DCorbett@birchlabs.com [mailto:DCorbett@ birchlabs.com]
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 10:09 AM
To: jhoogenakker @ci.edina.mn.us
Cc: mtfesenmaier @eschelon.com; rwenaas @usfamily.net
Subject: Proposal for additional gymnasiums
Dear Sirs,
We are home owners at 5616 Dalrymple Road, corner house across the street from the new
addition to the school that I stare at in amazement every day. I still cannot believe that was O.K.'d
considering the traffic we have put up with the last soon to be twenty years.
At present our house is for Sale. Our house was priced for "Quick Sale" and we were looking
forward to downsizing this year. It took only the initial run thru for the realtors to point out the existing
traffic and "eyesore"
across the street meant even lower pricing if we expect to sell. I cannot tell you how many
comments we have had saying "love the house and yard but way to much traffic for comfort." This
attitude is hard to combat when people are pulling into our driveway to turn around like we are part
of the school property as people are looking at the house.
We have actually seen times we could not pull into our own driveway during football season. What
can we expect now?
I cannot stress my amazement that the City of Edina would take a residential area already
overburdened with traffic from two schools and a community center and intentionally add to the
confusion with the plans in progress at present.
Does the city have our support? Absolutely not!
Sincerely,
4/19/2005
Page 2 of 2
James & Donna Corbett
5616 Dalrymple Rd.
Edina, MN 55424
cdc227 @aol.com
The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged, confidential, and protected
from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, any further disclosure or use, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you think that you
have received this e-mail message in error, please e-mail the sender at the above address, and
delete the e-mail. Thank you much.
4/19/2005
- -- USFamily.Net - $8.25/mo! -- Hi seed - $19.99/mo! - --
Page 1 of 1
Darlene Wallin
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 8:36 AM
To: Darlene Wallin
Cc: Gordon Hughes; Craig Larsen; Wayne Houle; Steve Lillehaug; John Keprios
Subject: FW: ECCNA Member - Important Message
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Fesenmaier, Maria T. [ mailto :mtfesenmaier @eschelon.com]
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 5:27 PM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: FW: ECCNA Member - Important Message
Jennifer,
Please forward this to Council, Mr. Keprios, Mr. Hughes, Mr. Larson, Mr. Houle and Mr. Lillehaug, for the
4/19/2005 council meeting.
Thanks!
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: BLIacono @aol.com [mailto:BLIacono @ aol.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2005 11:00 PM
To: mtfesenmaier @eschelon.com
Subject: Re: ECCNA Member - Important Message
Hi Maria,
Thank you for sending out this e-mail. I have been increasingly concerned about the fiasco that is happening at
City Hall with regard to the gyms:
Back in November, my husband and I sent an e-mail to John Keprios, expressing our opposition to the
proposed additional gyms. The only apparent result was an accounting in the Edina Sun indicating there was
little or no opposition, and a move forward by the City Council with the plan.
I will send you a separate e-mail; I would really appreciate it if you could get it to the appropriate people
( Keprios, city council members, or whomever).
I will definitely be at City Hall on Tuesday. Thanks again for all your efforts on our neighborhood's behalf.
Beth Iacono
4813 W. 59th Street
929 -4487
4/19/2005
.
Page 1 of 2
Darlene Wallin
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 8:37 AM
To: Darlene Wallin
Cc: Gordon Hughes; Craig Larsen; Wayne Houle; Steve Lillehaug; John Keprios
Subject: FW: Community Center Complex proposal input
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Fesenmaier, Maria T. [mailto:mtfesenmaier @eschelon.com]
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 5:28 PM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: FW: Community Center Complex proposal input
Jennifer,
Please forward this to Council, Mr. Keprios, Mr. Hughes, Mr. Larson, Mr. Houle and Mr. Lillehaug, for the
4/19/2005 council meeting.
Thanks!
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: morninglory081129 @comcast. net [ mailto : morning lory08ll29 @comcast.net]
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 8:25 AM
To: edinamail @ci.edina.mn.us
Cc: mtfesenmaier @eschelon.com
Subject: Community Center Complex proposal input
Hello,
We've lived at the intersection of 58th Street and Ashcroft Avenue for 2 years. We bought into this
neighborhood because we have 2 children, and it seemed to have the ideal sense of tranquility,
security, community, and convenience that we sought. Now these reasons appear to be strongly
threatened by the Community Center Complex proposal that is under consideration.
We've been concerned for some time about the proposed widening of our street from the current 28 feet
to 32 feet, against the wishes of us or any of our neighbors. We, nor our neighbors, have any desire for
a parking bay to be located directly across the street of our home. We've felt for some time that this will
only serve to invite non - neighbors to park near our home, threatening our security. Now we've learned
why the city wants to add more parking to our neighborhood: because of the Commercial Sports Facility
proposal. We feel that we're being steamrolled into something that we don't want to live with, and don't
want to pay for.
We are very concerned about this threat to our neighborhood. Our road widening problem is a strictly a
means to increase the number of parking for non - neighbors, and we are to pay for it. It appears that
the city still plans to widen our street, against the surveyed desires of all of our neighbors. The proposal,
apparently in advanced stages, to build a Commercial Sports Facility at the school complex at the end of
our street involves the construction of 5 indoor sports facilities which will be hosting practices, games,
and tournaments up to 7 nights per week and up to 10:30 PM nightly, with hundreds of additional car
driving thru our neighborhood daily. Traffic impact studies rejected our neighborhood as suitable for
even 2 additional gyms, but the City Planning Commission is moving forward with the plan regardless
of this rejection. Our property value, our neighborhood's safety and security, and our overall quality of
lif a are all most certainly on the line. Every reason we bought into this neighborhood is threatened,
4/19/2005
Page 2 of 2
despite the fact that we've put significant time, effort, and expense into remodeling our house into the
place that we planned to call home for years. We ask the City Council to please reject the proposal to
add any additional gym space to the project already committed to. A more suitable location or split
locations can certainly be found. Please consider how you would feel if this was your quality of life at
stake.
We also ask the the City Council NOT approve the plan to widen 58th Street to 32 feet. We wish the
street width to remain at the current 28 feet, to maintain slower driving speeds and to discourage on-
street parking of non - neighbors. The speed issue speaks for itself, and non - neighbor parking will
compromise our security. Our yards are also at risk. Our front yard, facing 58th Street, is quite narrow
enough, as anyone driving by can observe. We do not wish vehicles to be driving any closer to our
home than they already are, as it we hear each and every vehicle that speeds by as it is with the current
street width. Our neighbors across the street do not want to lose their beautiful mature trees, which
provide us all with pleasant shade in the summertime. Please consider our quality of life in making your
decision.
We will be in attendance at the April 19 City Council meeting, and reaffirm our wishes at that time.
PLEASE consider our concerns as if they were your own.
Sincerely,
Moira and Joshua Olson
5801 Ashcroft Avenue
4/19/2005
Page 1 of 1
Darlene Wallin
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 8:39 AM
To: Darlene Wallin
Cc: Gordon Hughes; Craig Larsen; Wayne Houle; Steve Lillehaug; John Keprios
Subject: FW: Gymnasium Proposal
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Fesenmaier, Maria T. [mailto:mtfesenmaier @eschelon.com]
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 5:30 PM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: FW: Gymnasium Proposal
Jennifer,
Please forward this to Council, Mr. Keprios, Mr. Hughes, Mr. Larson, Mr. Houle and Mr. Lillehaug, for the
4/19/2005 council meeting.
Thanks!
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: BLIacono @aol.com [mailto:BLIacono @aol.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2005 11:13 PM
To: mtfesenmaier @eschelon.com
Subject: Gymnasium Proposal
(Maria, would you please forward this message to appropriate persons at Edina City Hall? Thank you.)
We are homeowners within 500 feet of the Edina Community Center Campus, and we are writing to express
our concerns about the proposal to add two additional gymnasiums at the Community Center Campus.
As parents of two middle school boys who have always been very active Edina youth athletics, we fully support
providing all necessary athletic fields and facilities, as long as the safety and well -being of our neighborhoods
are not put at risk in the process.
Our main concerns are traffic safety and parking availability for users of the additional gyms (as well as the
numerous other gyms and theaters on the campus). This past summer's traffic and parking fiasco
(concentrated on the 4800 block of W. 59th Street and the streets leading to it) due to the re- location of youth
soccer to McCarthy Field is something that should not be repeated on a regular basis. To this day, I am
thankful (and somewhat amazed) that there was not a serious injury or death due to the excessive speeds, the
driving and parking on the wrong side of the street, the children darting out from between parked cars, the
hurried parents turning around in private driveways where neighborhood children were playing, etc., etc. And
to think of this happening during winter months when our already narrow streets are even narrower because of
snow drifts is unimaginable!
We urge you to consider other options and locations that would not put the safety and well -being of our
residential neighborhoods at risk.
Thank you.
Beth and David Iacono
4813 W. 59th Street
Edina
4/19/2005
Page 1 of 1
Darlene Wallin
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 8:39 AM
To: Darlene Wallin
Cc: . Gordon Hughes; Craig Larsen; Wayne Houle; Steve Lillehaug; John Keprios
Subject: FW: ECCNA Member - Important Message
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Fesenmaier, Maria T. [ mai lto:mtfesenmaier @eschelon.com]
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 5:31 PM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: FW: ECCNA Member - Important Message
ibennerotte(a)-ci.edina.mn.us
Jennifer,
Please forward this to Council, Mr. Keprios, Mr. Hughes, Mr. Larson, Mr. Houle and Mr. Lillehaug, for the
4/19/2005 council meeting.
Thanks!
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Sessy02 @aol.com [mailto:Sessy02 @aol.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2005 9:37 PM
To: mtfesenmaier @eschelon.com
Subject: Re: ECCNA Member - Important Message
Maria,
Please forward to appropriate council.
Thank you for the update on the Gymnasiums in our neighborhood. I would like to have my name added to the
list of neighbors that are not in support of the additional gymnasiums. I feel that the City Council has been
trying to jeopardize this neighborhood and continues to not look at all of the issues. They are not listening to
the transportation committee and are taking short cuts in this area. Let's start working for the entire city and not
continue to ruin the neighborhood by the schools.
There is too much traffic for all of the students in this current area. We are already going to add much to the
traffic in our neighborhood just by the additional space given to all of the schools in this area. Concord added
space last year and now we are adding much more space to the middle school and community/french
immersion school.
I AM NOT IN SUPPORT OF THE DECISION TO ADD AN ADDITIONAL GYM AND WOULD LIKE REVIEW OF
THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS BY OUR CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR.
Sandy Essendrup
4717 School Road
Edina, MN 55424
What else can be done to be heard by our Council and Mayor ? ? ? ??
4/19/2005
Page 1 of 2
Darlene Wallin
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 8:40 AM
To: Darlene Wallin
Cc: Gordon Hughes; Craig Larsen; Wayne Houle; Steve Lillehaug; John Keprios
Subject: FW: ECCNA Member - Important Message
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Fesenmaier, Maria T. [mailto:mtfesenmaier @eschelon.com]
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 5:39 PM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: RE: ECCNA Member - Important Message
Jennifer,
Please forward this to Council, Mr. Keprios, Mr. Hughes, Mr. Larson, Mr. Houle and Mr. Lillehaug, for the
4/19/2005 council meeting.
Thanks!
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Wessy0l @aol.com [mailto:Wessy0l @aol.com]
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 5:27 PM
To: mtfesenmaier @eschelon.com
Subject: Re: ECCNA Member - Important Message
April 17, 2005
Edina City Council: Mayor, Jim Hovland
Council Member Scot Housh
Council Member Alice Hulbert
Council Member Linda Masica
Council Member Ann Swenson
Again you continue to target the same small area of Edina for public use. We have lived in this
neighborhood for over 20 years and feel that we and most other neighbors have been excellent hosts
for many sports and school events year after year. Now with the addition of new facilitates to the
Community Center and South View we will deal with more. When it was just Edina student and parents
we were willing to continue to be good neighbors. However, the "game" has now changes with the city
wanting to add facilities that will be open for general use. Please seriously consideration that you
continue to cause great strain on the traffic and general congestion in this neighborhood. We have
been pushed as far as we can and are now ready to "fight back ". I am asking you to do your job and
consider the information below and take another look into the issues at hand. We do not want to build a
problem that can not be reversed. Neighborhood safety in Edina should be your number one
consideration not finding ways to make room for commercial sports facilities next to our schools and
homes. We feel strongly enough about this to personally "beat the pavement" before the next elections
4/19/2005
Page 2 of 2
if it appears we have elected officials who are not interested in our families and neighborhoods welfare.
Why the Edina Community Center Neighborhood Association opposes this plan:
• The ECC neighborhood was identified as a significant traffic problem area in 1999 ...nothing has
changed since then, except the addition of more traffic!
• The two additional gyms were added to construction plans after last year's referendum was passed
with a no vote by area Edina residents.
• The city commissioned a traffic study, but the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) unanimously
rejected the study as flawed. Yet, the City Planning Commission and City Council are going ahead,
ignoring the Transportation Commission's rejection.
• The flawed study looked at the effect of the two new gyms only ... not the impact of what would become
5 indoor sport areas that could host as many as 7 concurrent school or city- sponsored practices, games,
or tournaments drawing even more traffic through one concentrated area ... our neighborhood.
. In the study, only 2 practices or games per gym, per night, were assumed. The original rental plan
presented to Council, projected 6 practices or games in one gym, 4 in the other, each night! Again, this
will add significantly more traffic than the study projects.
• Original plans did not include weekend tournaments ... that's changed, along with a concession stand in
the revised plan. Events will start as early as 4pm and end as late as 10:30 pm, 7 days a week.
• For weekend tournaments, the study's projections are considerably lower than they should be... again,
because it considers only the 2 additional gyms.
• The study ignored the impact of other activities on traffic flow that will increase with the renovations at
Southview and the Community Center (theatre, music, other rec programs) that will of course grow as
time goes on.
• The study considered the effect of traffic on a very limited area. Increased traffic on Valley View Rd. was
not even considered relevant.
Please seriously consider these facts, do appropriate studies and consider the
children who go to school and families who live in this neighborhood. Given the
limited road space and options available once a decision has been made to add these
facilities it will be very difficult to "fix" after the fact.
Thank You for your consideration,
Bill Essendrup
4717 School Road
Edina, MN 55424
4/19/2005
Pagel of 2
Darlene Wallin
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 8:41 AM
To: Darlene Wallin
Cc: Gordon Hughes; Craig Larsen; Wayne Houle; Steve Lillehaug; John Keprios
Subject: FW: ECCNA Member - Important Message
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Fesenmaier, Maria T. [ mailto :mtfesenmaier @eschelon.com]
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 5:40 PM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: RE: ECCNA Member - Important Message
Jennifer,
Please forward this to Council, Mr. Keprios, Mr. Hughes, Mr. Larson, Mr. Houle and Mr. Lillehaug, for the
4/19/2005 council meeting.
Thanks!
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Wessy0l @aol.com [mailto:Wessy0l @aol.com]
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 5:27 PM
To: mtfesenmaier @eschelon.com
Subject: Re: ECCNA Member - Important Message
April 17, 2005
Edina City Council: Mayor, Jim Hovland
Council Member Scot Housh
Council Member Alice Hulbert
Council Member Linda Masica
Council Member Ann Swenson
Please take into consideration the neighborhood that you continue to cause great strain on the traffic. I
ask you to consider the information below and take another look into the transportation issues at hand.
We do not want to build a problem that can not be reversed. Safety in Edina should be our number one
consideration.
4/19/2005
Page 2 of 2
Why the Edina Community Center Neighborhood Association opposes this plan:
• The ECC neighborhood was identified as a significant traffic problem area in 1999 ...nothing has
changed since then, except the addition of more traffic!
• The two additional gyms were added to construction plans after last year's referendum was passed ...
with a no vote by area Edina residents.
• The city commissioned a traffic study, but the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) unanimously
rejected the study as flawed. Yet, the City Planning Commission and City Council are going ahead,
ignoring the Transportation Commission's rejection.
• The flawed study looked at the effect of the two new gyms only ... not the impact of what would become
5 indoor sport areas that could host as many as 7 concurrent school or city- sponsored practices, games,
or tournaments drawing even more traffic through one concentrated area ... our neighborhood.
• In the study, only 2 practices or games per gym, per night, were assumed. The original rental plan
presented to Council, projected 6 practices or games in one gym, 4 in the other, each night! Again, this
will add significantly more traffic than the study projects.
• Original plans did not include weekend tournaments ... that's changed, along with a concession stand in
the revised plan. Events will start as early as 4pm and end as late as 10:30 pm, 7 days a week.
• For weekend tournaments, the study's projections are considerably lower than they should be ... again,
because it considers only the 2 additional gyms.
• The study ignored the impact of other activities on traffic flow that will increase with the renovations at
Southview and the Community Center (theatre, music, other rec programs) that will of course grow as
time goes on.
• The study considered the effect of traffic on a very limited area. Increased traffic on Valley View Rd. was
not even considered relevant.
Please make your decision based on the traffic and not on personal desires.
Thank you,
Sandy Essendrup
4717 School Road
Edina, MN 55424
4/19/2005
Page 1 of 2
Darlene Wallin
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 8:41 AM
To: Darlene Wallin
Cc: Gordon Hughes; Craig Larsen; Wayne Houle; Steve Lillehaug; John Keprios
Subject: FW: letter to editor
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Fesenmaier, Maria T. [ mailto :mtfesenmaier @eschelon.com]
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 6:08 PM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: RE: letter to editor
Jennifer,
Please forward this to Council, Mr. Keprios, Mr. Hughes, Mr. Larson, Mr. Houle and Mr. Lillehaug, for the
4/19/2005 council meeting.
Thanks!
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Dan Rectenwald [mailto:DRectenwald @hga.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 8:38 AM
To: Fesenmaier, Maria T.
Subject: RE: letter to editor
see the attached. share as you like.
April 11, 2005
As the ECCNA representative that has participated in reviewing the current proposals for the Post -
Referendum Gymnasium Additions, I would like to offer opinion the status of the proposals (the article in
last week's Sun noted I was "unavailable for comment ").
In my opinion, the Gymnasiums would better serve the community at a different site. A superior alternative
would be a site with better access, ample parking, maximized traffic safety with no threat to residential
neighborhoods. The Normandale and South-view sites possess none of these attributes.
As a member of the Edina Community Center Neighborhood Association, I have represented the same
opinion to the Post - Referendum Gymnasium Additions planning group. Safety has always been the #1
priority of the ECCNA, and the current proposal compromises such.
That being said, I have still participated in the planning in a positive manner, supporting functional, flexible
and cost effective design. The requests of the ECCNA have not added costs to the project (probably the
contrary). Although I personally do not condone the Gymnasium Additions at the Normandale and
Southview School locations, I have been trying, as an Architect, to make them "good" projects (making
lemonade with these lemons). This should not be confused with my personal, or the ECCNA's,
endorsement. It is not; there are still serious concerns.
The Post - Referendum Gymnasium Additions user group did not discuss parking demand /location, traffic
or safety. Per last week's Sun article, Council member Housh has already acknowledged that traffic in the
area is a problem and the gyms will only compromise the are further. Granted, the gym additions did try to
4/19/2005
Page 2 of 2
allow for access from more than one parking lot, but this will have little to no impact on the traffic in the
area. Bottom line, the Southview /ECC area has been identified by the City of Edina Transportation
Commission as one of the city's safety "trouble zones." The referendum expansions and additional
gymnasiums compound the situation (tee do zvantpeople to utilitie these new additions don't eve ?), and the Gym
Additions exacerbate the issue further. Traffic and safety are real issues.
The published ETC meeting minutes of 3/24/05 note the latest traffic study as timid and limited in scope,
commenting that the impact on the area feeder streets would be imperceptible. The city commissioners
noted that the study had its "flaws," lacked a critical analysis of the situation, and requested "a new traffic
study that will take a look at the on the entire community" (oddly, the Planning Commission "rubber
stamped" the project anyway).
The process for the Post - Referendum Gymnasium Additions has been moving fast, going public right after
the elections and seeking City Council approval at the holiday season, all in the name of "economies of
scale" and cost savings. Reports indicate that the projects are presently 25% over budget. The gyms are
freestanding entities, away from any Referendum project work. In my opinion there is little to no savings
from moving so fast.
In conclusion, the ECCNA appreciates having the opportunity to be involved. We have contributed in a
positive manner. However, I and the ECCNA still feel that the additions threaten the safety of our
neighborhoods and do not support the gymnasium additions at this location.
Dan Rectenwald
5611 Sherwood Ave
Edina, MN 55424
C 612/867 -2377
4/19/2005
Page 1 of 1
Darlene Wallin
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 8:45 AM
To: Darlene Wallin
Subject: FW: Proposal to Add Additional Gyms
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Roebuck, Lisa [mailto:URoebuck @CBBURNET.COM]
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 9:40 PM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Cc: mtfesenmaier @eschelon.com
Subject: Proposal to Add Additional Gyms
Dear Mayor Hovland and Council Members,
Allow me to tell you what bothers me about this proposal. This neighborhood told you, several years ago, in no
uncertain terms, that it DID NOT WANT a dome over its football field or a mega - structure of gyms to rent out to
the community. You heard us, the plans were scrapped, and more recently we agreed with the need for certain
changes to our schools and community center. Now I find out that what,you couldn't bring in the front door, you're
trying to sneak in the back. I do not want these extra gyms shoved down my throat. They don't belong here.
They belong at Braemar, where there is space to put them and little risk to the surrounding residents.
Don't assume that I reject this proposal because my children aren't athletes. My daughter was a captain of the
tennis team and won two state championships. My son was a varsity tennis player and his team won state twice.
My youngest daughter plays lacrosse and tennis. We know the importance of athletic involvement better than
anybody, but these gyms will not improve our children's lives. On the contrary, you will turn this neighborhood
into a three -ring circus and I truly believe this is a recipe for disaster.
This neighborhood, with its curvy streets, limited stop signs and lack of sidewalks, is tricky even for its own
residents. As each of my children has learned to drive, I have felt the need to stress, over and over, the danger of
driving carelessly in this neighborhood, where children on bikes and people with dogs circle Lake Harvey, in the
street, even in the dark. You bring in a large number of outsiders who don't know the neighborhood, the streets,
the patterns of its residents, at a time when a sporting event has ended, it's dark out, people are tired, annoyed,
happy, celebrating, whatever.... it's a crisis waiting to happen.
Am I speaking from experience? I was hit broadside at an unmarked intersection in this neighborhood six years
ago by a young man. He was on his cell phone calling for directions because he was lost, he approached the
intersection and saw me but, as he told the policeman, he assumed I had a stop sign because he didn't, so he
plowed into me. 1 spent months in physical therapy. A child on a bicycle will not be so lucky.
Please- consider what the residents of this neighborhood are saying to you. We are not whiners. We love our
homes, our town, our schools. We have always stepped up when you asked us to help support a change for the
better. Please, do the right thing. These additional gyms are too much for this area.
Sincerely,
Lisa Roebuck - Krasno
5607 Dalrymple Road
952 - 922 -9164
4/19/2005
Presentation Outline
1. Process participation
2. Traffic Management
3. A "passive" alternative
4. Conclusion
April 19, 2005 Edina Community Center Neighborhood Association
Process Participation
1. Representation at the User Group
meetings
• Functional needs
• Design response review
2. ECCNA's priority: Traffic and Safety
• Recognized by Design Team as an issue with
this site
• Traffic Study was not done with Planning
Studies
April 19, 2005 Edina Community Center Neighborhood Association
Traffic Study Findings
1. Referendum work
• higher utilization of facilities are
anticipated, but site will manage to net
gain of "0."
2. Gym Additions-. 60 parking spaces
per gym (includes cross over. time)
-added (as in EXTRA) vehicle every
5-8 seconds (during 15-20 minute
cross over time")
April 19, 2005 Edina Community Center Neighborhood Association
Management of E
1. Planning / Scheduling Principle:
ALL PARKING PROVIDED ON SITE
2. The ECC SITE needs to do a better job PROACTIVELY
managing the demand on the site
• More proactive management of traffic /parking in neighborhood
— Establish a review process
— Monthly / quarterly meetings with ECCNA or others
— Take it seriously
3. The ECCNA beseeches the Council to explore better
"passive" options for Gym Additions
• Fewer safety concerns
• Potential for appropriate parking supply and locations
• Potential for greater utilization
April 19, 2005 Edina Community Center Neighborhood Association
Other-Locations to, Consider
1. Braemer Park
2. Creekside Elementary School
3. Lewis Park
4. Others....
• Goal- Make SAFETY a priority;
(less, traffic /neighborhood conflict)
April 19, 2005 Edina Community Center Neighborhood Association
11-VI-1 "I
c
I I I
e.
17 i
1) 0 F
897.6
X97.?
Ll
in
20
--, ". d
rim
.9
r
Bet-)
j,
(on"c'
Wc
A 'I
Y l
'it
� !3t"
I I., _-4ll23.3
I! IN
.�, '" ';� �I,111;ii 1L� ,gyp
of I
87
x
v
U
x 891.4 7N
x
885
7N
P.- `4
c
I I I
e.
17 i
1) 0 F
897.6
X97.?
Ll
in
20
--, ". d
rim
.9
r
Bet-)
j,
(on"c'
Wc
A 'I
Y l
'it
� !3t"
I I., _-4ll23.3
I! IN
.�, '" ';� �I,111;ii 1L� ,gyp
of I
87
x
T �i �
I� �I i loo, .3
,i
Aral:
\ x 864,9 1 . /,
891.4
PAPI 10 G,
890----.-!—
H
I. 'It
N.
d V
l,
3:1 o
'01 4
pI .1
P-i ... ....
1W
897.6
7.1
tt ��
�,
87
1371' x
9.l .
5.31
WEW-
woo
GYMs.
a
Ity..
x 091.4
Z —
741
a
Ity..
x 091.4
F. I '%
I . It-
997.6
\ \ \\ x e64.9 i J I /
. . ...... --7:�77
. . ........ .......
v 11
al
Z —
4
'Oy ov
V4
r
f9
0
DF:
"41
x.
'j
V
jJ
cl, .
x
�
i
/!
F. I '%
I . It-
997.6
\ \ \\ x e64.9 i J I /
. . ...... --7:�77
. . ........ .......
v 11
al
4
V4
t4 6-
"41
'j
V
jJ
7PO
YP
9.
87
x
876.
"AF4
9
V4
t4 6-
7PO
9.
87
x
876.
Braemer Park: Program Overview
Space Comparison
ECC
Proposal
SV
Proposal
Total
Proposed
At Braemer
Proposed
At Braemer
gsimsJ
3 ms
Gyms
61310
6,290
12,600
129600
18,900
Lobbies
1,855
21000
39855
25000
29500,
Storage
230
225
455
230
400 j
Toilets
600
625
19225
600
900
Concessions
210
0
210
0
0
Housekeeping
40
55
95
40
40
Lockers
0
0
0
21000
29000
Mechanical
0
0
0
500
500
Site Work
0
0
0
0
0
Sub Totals (SF)
%245
91195
189440
179970
259240
Current Budget
PR
( OJECT cost)
$4,8009 000
$496779657
$693109000
$195109000
"Project" Cost
per SF
1
$260
$260
II
$250
April 19, 2005 Edina Community 9 Center Nei hborhood Association
Braemer Park: Cost Implications
"Project" Cost
Increases
Cost Increases
per year (over
20 years)
Cost per
Citizen/year
Cost per
Citizen /month
April 19, 2005
Ed
111
Low
$11500,000
$75,000.00
$1.56
H�ic' h
$1, 650, 000
i
$
$1.72
12 $0.13 $0.14
Edina Community Center Neighborhood Association
Conclusion
0
t. More program on the ECC site creates
more traffic and SAFTEY CONCERNS
2. There are better options (ie: Braemer
Park) that
-will not cost more
-will have improved safety
-will have no residential traffic and
parking conflicts
April 19, 2005 Edina Community Center Neighborhood Association
Item #1
Presentation Overview
Maria Fesenmaier
I
Edina Community Center Neighborhood
Association
Overview
Our presentation has 5 components:
1.) Present an overview of the ECCNA, and the
Associations views on the overall gym proposal.
Maria Fesenmaier
2.) Present corrected /additional factual data
pertaining to the ETC traffic study, and its
addendum.
Ron Wenaas
3.) Present Existing Hazardous Safety Condition
Example
Area Resident Example
4.) Present alternative suggestions for locations.
Dan Rectenwald
5.) And finally, to ask that Council reject the proposal
for the two proposed gyms at the ECC campus.
We ask the Council vote NO tonight to the
proposed Facility Use Agreement until further
extensive traffic /safety tests can -be completed
(that incorporate the two gyms and the current
construction), and that extensive tests be
completed to evaluate alternate site l- Ocations for
the two remaining gyms. We request that safety
and quality of life, continue to remain_ everyones
main focus, rather than speed of construction and
convenience of location.
Ryan Langsev
�I.
...........
Lill
rr
Con 0! o 'IQ
7-
cp
-zl
1-, d
Item #2
Traffic Study
Ron Wenaas
Traffic Stud
y
One Thing Is Correct
•
�
1975 to 2001
—1703 to 3675 Per Day
— 215% Increase and Growin
9��'�
Traffic Is Up
Safety is Down
Traffic S
Bad Design
Wrong Assumptions
Weak Conclusions
Lack of Credibility
Number of Courts
Study's Assumptions
2 Disputed Courts Only
Reality
Should Have Been Based
on 3 New Courts
Hours of Operation
Study's Assumption
6:30 -9:30 PM
90 Minute Sessions
Reality
Southview
ECC
4 -10
PM
6 -10
PM
One Hour Sessions
Traffic Flow
Study's Assumptions
30 Cars Per Session
(40 participants per event =
30 cars ?)
Added Traffic to
SouthView
Hours of Operation
4:00 — 10:00 PM = 6'Events
2 New Courts
x 6 Events /Court
x 30 Cars Each Event
360 Added Cars /Evening
Added Traffic at CC
Hours of Operation
6:00 — 10:00 PM = 4 Events
1 New Court
x 4 Events
x 30 Cars Each Event
120 Added Cars /Evening
Traffic Increase
Southview
ECC
360
added -
6
hrs
120
added -
4
hrs
Total 480 Each Evening
400% More Than the Study
Projected
Likely Case*
Total Courts
Hourly Events
Cars Per Event
S ECC
4 3
6 4
30 30
720 + 360
1080 Cars in 6 Hours
* Not including other events or likely-growth
Level of Service
• Traffic levels from "A" to "F"
Traffic over 24 hour period
• Southview Lane = "B"
3800 cars per day
is Our conclusion = 1080 /Evening
Traffic Is U P
Safety
is Down
Safet
y
1st
9
Item #3
Existing Hazardous Safety Condition Example
Lisa Roebuck - Krasno
. Dear Mayor Hovland and Council Members,
I am reading this statement for Lisa Roebuck - Krasno. She and her
family reside at 5607 Dalrymple Road.
Please allow me to tell you what concerns me about this proposal.
This neighborhood told you, several years ago, in no uncertain
terms, that it DID NOT WANT a dome over its football field or a
mega- structure of gyms to rent out. You heard us, the plans were
scrapped, and more recently we agreed with the need for certain
changes to our schools and community center, via a referendum
that was passed.
Now I find out that what you couldn't bring in the front door with this
referendum, you're trying to sneak in the back door. I do not want
these extra gyms shoved down my throat. They don't belong here.
They belong at an alternative site such as Braemar, where there is
space to put them with little traffic safety risk to the surrounding
residents.
Please do not assume that I reject this proposal because my
children aren't athletes. My daughter was a captain of the tennis
team and won two state championships. My son was a varsity
tennis player and his team won state twice. My youngest daughter
plays lacrosse and tennis. We know the importance of athletic
involvement better than anybody, but these gyms will not improve
our children's lives. On the contrary, you will turn this neighborhood
into a three -ring circus and I truly believe this is a recipe for
disaster.
This neighborhood, with its curvy streets, limited stop signs and
lack of sidewalks, is tricky even for its own residents. As each of my
children has learned to drive, I have felt the need to stress, over
and over, the danger of driving carelessly in this neighborhood,
where children on bikes and people with dogs circle Lake Harvey,
in the street, even in the dark. You bring in a large number of
outsiders who don't know the neighborhood, the streets, the
patterns of its residents, at a time when a sporting event has
ended, it's dark out, people are tired, annoyed, happy, celebrating,
whatever ........... it is a crisis waiting to happen!
Am I speaking from experience?
Yes, six years ago, I was hit broadside by a young man at an
unmarked intersection in this neighborhood. He was on his cell
phone calling for directions because he was lost. He approached
the intersection and saw me but, as he told the policeman, he
assumed I had a stop sign because he didn't have one. He plowed
into me. I spent months in physical therapy.
A child on a bicycle will not be so lucky.
Can you afford to make this decision? I say no. The area residents
have been asking for these safety issues to be addressed for years
now, at the same time plans were in the works for new gym space.
Why is gym space at the ECC Campus more important than
safety?
Please consider what the residents of this neighborhood are saying
to you. We are not whiners. We love our homes, our town, our
schools. We have always stepped up when you asked us to help
support a change for the better. Please, do the right thing. These
additional gyms are too much for this area.
Sincerely, Lisa Roebuck - Krasno 5607 Dalrymple Road
Item #5
Quality of Life
Ryan Langsev
SAFE NEIGHBORHOODS, NOT SPORTS COMPLEX
1. PLAN CONTRARY TO THE RECENT INTENT OF
THE MAJORITY OF CITY VOTERS.
The Sports Complex Plan fails to recognize residents Citywide
voted overwhelmingly against the $44 million referendum
supported by City AND School District for park improvements.
2. PLAN HEAVILY BURDENS MINORITY TO THE
BENEFIT OF THE PERCEIVED MAJORITY.
Much of the Edina Community Center Neighborhood is
without sidewalks, curb and gutter requiring immediate
assessments to accommodated the Sports Complex Plan.
3. PLAN NOT SENSITIVE TO THE QUALITY OF LIFE
IN EDINA COMM. CTR. NEIGHBORHOOD.
The Sports Complex plan lacks sensitivity to the Quality of
Life for the ECC Neighborhood while traffic concerns are
addressed in Country Club and Morningside neighborhoods by
(a) compromising the SAFETY of our neighborhood children
and residents, and
(b) circumventing previous long -term Urban planning Designs
meant to keep significant vehicular traffic from entering the
neighborhood and turns the area into a traffic destination.
4. PLAN FAILS TO JUSTIFY THE RATIONALE FOR
ITS TENTATIVE APPROVAL.
Much of the reasons for conditional approval of the Sports
Complex Plan no longer justify its ongoing existence.
Ifyou can not attend, please either email or call Maria Fesenmaier, or Ron Wenaas. Sign the petition and they will
bring it to the meeting. Your Vote can make the differencel If you can, write a note or letter, email it to them and they
will have it delivered to City Council and City Staff.
Please attend the Public Hearing, your attendance will make the difference!
Maria Fesenmaier
ECCNA President
5713 Concord Ave.
952.239.8830 (cell)
952.922.6734 (home)
mtfesenmaierna,eschelon.com
Ron Wenaas
ECCNA Steering Committee
5617 Sherwood Ave.
6IZ41& 7077 (cell)
952.929.0019 (home)
rwenaas(a,usfamily.net
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING (case file #C -05 -2) Resident Petition:
I, the undersigned, do state that I am a resident of the City Of Edina, and I DO NOT SUPPORT the two
proposed gyms to be constructed at the Edina Community Center Facility.
I urge Council to reject the permit application.
114"
s,
4
9.
"r
If you can not attend, please either email or call Maria Fesenmaier, or Ron Wenaas. Sign the petition and they will
bring it to the meeting. Your Vote can make the difference) If you can, write a note or letter, email it to them and they
will have it delivered to City Council and City Staff.
Please attend the Public Hearing, your attendance will make the difference!
Maria Fesenmaier
ECCNA President
5713 Concord Ave.
952.239.8830 (cell)
952.922.6734 (home)
mtfesenmaier(aaeschelon.com
Ron Wenaas
ECCNA Steering Committee
5617 Sherwood Ave.
612.418 7077 (cell)
952.929.0019 (home)
rwenaasna,usfamily.net
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING (case file #C -05 -2) Resident Petition:
I, the undersigned, do state that I am a resident of the City Of Edina, and I DO NOT SUPPORT the two
proposed gyms to be constructed at the Edina Community Center Facility.
I urge Council to reject the permit application.
ADDRESS:
If you can not attend, please either email or call Maria Fesenmaier, or Ron Wenaas. Sign the petition and they will
bring it to the meeting. Your Vote can make the difference! If you can, write a note or letter, email it to them and they
will have it delivered to City Council and City Staff.
Please attend the Public Hearing, your attendance will make the difference!
Maria Fesenmaier
ECCNA President
5713 Concord Ave.
952.239.8830 (cell)
952.922.6734 (home)
mtfesenmaier(i ,eschelon.com
Ron Wenaas
ECCNA Steering Committee
5617 Sherwood Ave.
6IZ41& 7077 (cell)
952.929.0019 (home)
rwenaasna,usfamily.net
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING (case file #C -05 -2) Resident Petition:
I, the undersigned, do state that I am a resident of the City Of Edina, and I DO NOT SUPPORT the two
proposed gyms to be constructed at the Edina Community Center Facility.
I urge Council to reject the permit application.
NAME. ADDRESS: SIG TUBE:
ip Feyenotqw, 5-713
a
e c v
07 ►awl /
n v of ►� r�
''T e.►t `1�3i,r�..�..,.,. S L t � S �C. A�d..rs, s °�.rw u9�.�..«,
..: .,1A 24 IM � fi r? % 04.
If you can not attend, please either email or call Maria Fesenmaier, or Ron Wenaas. Sign the petition and they will
bring it to the meeting. Your Vote can make the difference! If you can, write a note or letter, email it to them and they
will have it delivered to City Council and City Staff.
Please attend the Public Hearing, your attendance will make the difference!
Maria Fesenmaier Ron Wenaas
ECCNA President ECCNA Steering Committee
5713 Concord Ave. 5617 Sherwood Avg
952.239.8830 (cell) 612.418.7077 (cell)
952.,922:6734 (home) 952.929.0019 (home)
mtfesenmaier(a,eschelon.com rwenaasausfamily.net
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING (case file #C -05 -2) Resident Petition:
I, the undersigned, do state that I am a resident of the City Of Edina, and I DO NOT SUPPORT the two
proposed gyms to be constructed at the Edina Community Center Facility.
I urge Council to reject the permit application.
NAME. ADDRESS. SIGNATURE.
�.
J) W1 , LvcdC S92 CPW-CORD ,9yE. 6Dlr✓A MA2 R.
S
r- z c
Council Member
/ Council Member
Council Member
Council Member
Scot Housh
Alice Hulbert
Linda Masica
Ann Swenson
763 - 302 -7174
952- 942 -5615
952- 942 -6770
952- 927 -7524
If you can not attend, please either email or call Maria Fesenmaier, or Ron Wenaas. Sign the petition and they will
bring it to the meeting. Your Vote can make the d fferencel Ifyou can, write a note or letter, email it to them and they
will have it delivered to City Council and City Staff.
Please attend the Public Hearing, your attendance will make the difference!
Maria Fesenmaier Ron Wenaas
ECCNA President JECCNA Steering Committee
5713 Concord Avg 5617 Sherwood Avg
952.239.8830 (cell) 612.418: 7077 (cell) "
952.922.6734 (home) 952.929.0019 (home)
mtfesenmaier(7 schelon.eom rwenaas(a,usfamily.net
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING (case file #C -05 -2) Resident Petition:
I, the undersigned, do state that I am a resident of the City Of Edina, and I DO NOT SUPPORT the two
proposed gyms to be constructed at the Edina Community Center Facility.
I urge Council to reject the permit application.
NAME: ADDRESS. • GNATURE:
w
r�
If you can not attend, please either email or call Maria Fesenmaier, or Ron Wenaas Sign the petition and they will
bring it to the meeting. Your Vote can make the difference! If you can, write a note or letter, email it to them and they
will have it delivered to City Council and City Staff.
Please attend the Public Hearing, your attendance will make the difference!
Maria Fesenmaier Ron Wenaas.
ECCNA President ECCNA'Steering Committee
5713 Concord Ave. 5617 Sherwood Ave
952.239.8830 (cell) 612.418.7077-(ceU),
952.922.6734 (home) 952.929 0019 (home)
mtfe §enmaier(a,eschelon.c6in rwenaa�sfamily.net
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING (case file #C 05 -2) Resident Petition:
I, the undersigned, do state that I am a resident of the City Of Edina, and I DO NOT SUPPORT the two
proposed gyms to. be constructed at the Edina Community Center Facility.
I urge Council to reject the permit application.
1
IM 11& /,Z- �LL -'A. 1AWAA
/;„
If you can not attend, please either email or call Maria Fesenmaier, or Ron Wenaas. Sign the petition and they will
bring it to the meeting. Your Vote can make the differencel If you can, write a note or letter, email it to them and they
will have it delivered to City Council and City Staff.
Please attend the Public Hearing, your attendance will make the difference! .
Maria Fesenmaier
ECCNA President
5713 Concord Ave.
952.239.8830 (cell)
952.922.6734 (home)
mffesewmaier a,ewhelon.com
Ron Wenaas
ECCNA Steering Committee
5617 Sherwood Av&
612.41& 7077 (cell)
952.929.0019 (home)
rwenaas(a,usfamily.net
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING (case file #C -05 -2) Resident Petition:
I, the undersigned, do state that I am a resident of the City Of Edina, and I DO NOT SUPPORT the two
proposed gyms to be constructed at the Edina Community Center Facility.
I urge Council to reject the permit application.
---- -Original Message---- -
From: chris wichman [mailtwchris wich @yahoo.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2005 12:37 PM
To: edinamail @ci.edina.mn.us
Cc: mtfesenmaier @eschelon.com
Subject: Re: Additional Gym Construction at South View Middle School C -0502
Re: Additional Gym Construction at South View Middle School C -0502
My wife and I both live across the street from South View Middle School, right
across the street at 5617 St. Andrews Avenue. We both are very disappointed,
close to infuriated about the consideration of additional construction of more
gyms at the school. We both went through this once before 3 years ago and
are greatly annoyed that this is being done again. What is more upsetting is the
fact that this was defeated once before and the money expenditure has not
been voted upon by the public. It is even going to cost 1 million dollars more.
There is a traffic and parking problem here at the middle school and we as
residents take the brunt of the problem. Every Saturday and Sunday and in the
weekday evenings, my street is stuffed with SUV's and people cruising around
looking for a place to park so they can do the gym or activity at the school.
Every football game, it is worse. And to add to the problem, when there is a
football game, both sides of the streets are chockfull of cars making it very hard
to get down the street.
If you consider adding a multilevel car park, you may solve your parking
problem, but I doubt if it is cost effective and you still have to deal with the traffic
on residential streets.
Now you still have to get all those cars and people in and out of they area, and
we come to safety. The roads are not designed for the traffic flow. Construction
of the gyms will bring in more traffic and keep it there longer crowding the area
neighborhood. I do not include the addtional traffic issue caused by the recent
renovation of the swimming pool and auditorium in the community center. This
is residential and I really resent the fact that you are turning into more of a
Lifetime Fitness Center without a parking lot. Do a traffic study for all the hours
concerned (a proper one, not an experts guess and include the recent
improvements to the school that will bring more people in ll). And don't be so
hypocritical about this, since the city is considering traffic calming and
redirection for other parts of town, why shift it over here.
These gyms belong in the Braemar area and not here. Get it through your
heads that this neighborhood does not want the gyms, the,traffic and the
parking problems here. I note the proponents do not live here and will drive
here to use it. I don't see them leaving the cars behind and walking.
Do not build these gyms. Get public referendum approval and if you must have
them, move them to Braemar. What part of NO do you not understand.
Chris and Teri Wichman
5617 St. Andrews Avenue
Edina, MN 952 - 927 -8224
Jennifer,
Please forward this to Council, Mr. Keprios, Mr. Hughes, Mr. Larson, Mr. Houle and Mr. Lillehaug, for the
4/19/2005 council meeting.
Thanks!
-Original Message-- -
From: Dan Rectenwald [mailto:DRectenwald @hga.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 8:38 AM
To: Fesenma!er, Maria T.
Subject: RE: letter to editor
see the attached. share as you like.
April 11, 2005
As the ECCNA representative that has participated in reviewing the current proposals for the Post -
Referendum Gymnasium Additions, I would like to offer opinion the status of the proposals (the article in
last week's Sun noted I was "unavailable for comment ").
In my opinion, the Gymnasiums would better serve the community at a different site. A superior alternative
would be a site with better access, ample parking, maximized traffic safety with no threat to residential
neighborhoods. The Normandale and Southview sites possess none of these attributes.
As a member of the Edina Community Center Neighborhood Association, I have represented the same
opinion to the Post - Referendum Gymnasium Additions planning group. Safety has always been the # 1
priority of the ECCNA, and the current proposal compromises such.
That being said, I have still participated in the planning in a positive manner, supporting functional, flexible
and cost effective design. The requests of the ECCNA have not added costs to the project (probably the
contrar)). Although I personally do not condone the Gymnasium Additions at the Normandale and
Southview School locations, I have been trying, as an Architect, to make them "good" projects (making
lemonade with these lemons). This should not be confused with my personal, or the ECC NA's,
endorsement. It is not; there are still serious concerns.
The Post - Referendum Gymnasium Additions user group did not discuss parking demand/location, traffic
or safety. Per last week's Sun article; Council member Housh has already acknowledged that traffic in the
area is a problem and the gyms will only compromise the are further. Granted, the gym additions did try to
allow for access from more than one parking lot, but this will have little to no impact on the traffic in the
area. Bottom line, the Southview /ECC area has been identified by the City of Edina Transportation
Commission as one of the city's safety "trouble zones." The referendum expansions and additional
gymnasiums compound the situation (ue ab uum people to t6hze due wwaddiaw don't ve?), and the Gym
Additions exacerbate ,.,the issue further. Traffic and safety are real issues.
The published ETC meeting minutes of 3/24/05 note the latest traffic study as timid and limited in scope,
commenting that the impact on the area feeder streets would be imperceptible. The city commissioners
noted that the study had its "flaws," lacked a critical analysis of the situation, and requested "a new traffic
study that will take a look at the on the entire community" (oddly, the Planning Commission "rubber
stamped" the project anywa)).
The process for the Post - Referendum Gymnasium Additions has been moving fast, going public right after
the elections and seeking City Council approval at the holiday season, all in the name of "economies of
scale" and cost savings. Reports indicate that the projects are presently 25% over budget. The gyms are
freestanding entities, away from any Referendum project work In my opinion there is little to no savings
from moving so fast.
In conclusion, the ECCNA appreciates having the opportunity to be involved. We have contributed in a
positive manner. However, I and the ECCNA still feel that the additions threaten the safety of our
neighborhoods and do not support the gymnasium additions at this location.
Dan Rectenwald
5611 Sherwood Ave
Edina, MN 55424
pent: Monday, April 18, 2005 5:31 PM
To: 'jbennerotte @ci.edina.mn.us'
Subject: FW: ECCNA Member - Important Message
ibennerotteCcilci.edina.mn.us
Jennifer,
Please forward this to Council, Mr. Keprios, Mr. Hughes, Mr. Larson, Mr. Houle and Mr. Lillehaug, for the
4/19/2005 council meeting.
Thanks!
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Sessy02 @aol.com [maiito:Sessy02 @aol.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2005 9:37 PM
To: mtfesenmaler @eschelon.com
Subject: Re: ECCNA Member - Important Message
Maria,
Please forward to appropriate council.
Thank you for the update on the Gymnasiums in our neighborhood. I would like to have my name added to the
list of neighbors that are not in support of the additional gymnasiums. I feel that the City Council has been
trying to jeopardize this neighborhood and continues to not look at all of the issues. They are not listening to
the transportation committee and are taking short cuts in this area. Let's start working for the entire city and not
continue to ruin the neighborhood by the schools.
There is too much traffic for all of the students in this current area. We are already going to add much to the
traffic in our neighborhood just by the additional space given to all of the schools in this area. Concord added
space last year and now we are adding much more space to the middle school and community/french
immersion school.
I AM NOT IN SUPPORT OF THE DECISION TO ADD AN ADDITIONAL GYM AND WOULD LIKE REVIEW OF
THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS BY OUR CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR.
Sandy Essendrup
4717 School Road
Edina, MN 55424
What else can be done to be heard by our Council and Mayor ? ? ? ??
4/18/2005
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 5:25 PM
To: 'jbennerotte @ci.edina.mn.us'
Subject: FW: Proposal for additional gymnasiums
Jennifer,
Please forward this to Council, Mr. Keprios, Mr. Hughes, Mr. Larson, Mr. Houle and Mr. Lillehaug, for the
4/19/2005 council meeting.
Thanks!
Message - - - -- '
From: DCorbett @birchlabs.com [mailto:DCorbett @birchlabs.com]
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 10:09 AM
To: jhoogenakker @ci.edina.mn.us
Cc: mtfesenmaier @eschelon.com; rwenaas @usfamily.net
Subject: Proposal for additional gymnasiums
Dear Sirs,
We are home owners at 5616 Dalrymple Road, corner house across the street from the new
addition to the school that I stare at in amazement every day. I still cannot believe that was O.K.'d
considering the traffic we have put up with the last soon to be twenty years.
At present our house is for Sale. Our house was priced for "Quick Sale" and we were looking
forward to downsizing this year. It took only the initial run thru for the realtors to point out the existing
traffic and "eyesore"
across the street meant even lower pricing if we expect to sell. I cannot tell you how many
comments we have had saying "love the house and yard but way to much traffic for comfort." This
attitude is hard to combat when people are pulling into our driveway to turn around like we are part
of the school property as people are looking at the house.
We have actually seen times we could not pull into our own driveway during football season. What
can we expect now?
I cannot stress my amazement that the City of Edina would take a residential area already
overburdened with traffic from two schools and a community center and intentionally add to the
confusion with the plans in progress at present.
Does the city have our support? Absolutely not!
Sincerely,
James & Donna Corbett
5616 Dalrymple Rd.
Edina, MN 55424
cdc227 @aol.com
4/18/2005
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 5:27 PM
To: 'jbennerotte @ci.edina.mn.us'
Subject: FW: ECCNA Member - Important Message
Jennifer, ..
Please forward this to Council, Mr. Keprios, Mr. Hughes, Mr. Larson, Mr. Houle and Mr. Lillehaug, for the
4/19/2005 council meeting.
Thanks!
- Original Message--- -
From:: BLIacono@aol.com [mailto:BLIacono @aol.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2005 11:00 PM
To: mtfesenmaier @eschelon.com
Subject Re,.ECCNA Member - Important Message
Hi Maria,
Thank you for sending out this e-mail. I have been increasingly concerned about the fiasco that is happening at
City Hall with regard to the gyms.
Back in November, my husband and I sent an e-mail to John Keprios, expressing our opposition to the
proposed additional gyms. The only apparent result was an accounting in the Edina Sun indicating there was
little or no opposition, and a move forward by the City Council with the plan.
will send you a separate e-mail; I would really appreciate it if you could get it to the appropriate people
( Keprios, city council members, or whomever).
I will definitely be at City Hall on Tuesday. Thanks again for all your efforts on our neighborhood's behalf.
Beth Iacono.. ,..
4813 W. 59th Street
929 -4487
4/18/2005
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 5:29 PM
To: 'jbennerotte @ci.edina.mn.us'
Subject: FW: Additional Gym Proposal (Case C -05 -2)
Jennifer,
Please forward this to Council, Mr. Keprios, Mr. Hughes, Mr. Larson, Mr. Houle and Mr. Lillehaug, for the
4/19/2005 council. meeting.
Thanks!
- - - -= Original Message -..
From: Dan Rectenwald [mailto:DRectenwald @hga.com]
Sent: Monday, April A, 2005 7:09 AM
To: jhoogenakker @ci.edina.mn.us
Cc; Fesenmaier, Maria T.
Subject: Addibonal'Gym Proposal (Case C -05 -2)
would like-to give testimony at the city council meeting on April 19, 2005.
1 am.opposed to the current gymnasium addition proposal and would like to offer testimony directed towards why I
feel a Braemer Park option would work, over viewing:
a) Programs Needs
b) Planning Options
c) Impact on Parking
d) Impact on Traffic
e) Impact on Cost
f) Comments from the EHA
h) Why this option is safer and offers long term flexibility
will have some 11x17 diagrams to share.
Daniel J. Rectenwald, AIA, ACHA
Principal
Hammel, Green & Abrahamson, Inc.
701 Washington Avenue North
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
Direct: 612/75&4564
Fax: 612/758 -9564
Cell: 612/867 -2377
4/18/2005
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 5:30 PM
To: 'jbennerotte @ci.edina.mn.us'
Subject: FW: Gymnasium Proposal
Jennifer,
Please forward this to Council, Mr. Keprios, Mr. Hughes, Mr. Larson, Mr. Houle and Mr. Lillehaug, for the
4/19/2005 council meeting.
Thanks!
- - -- Original Message-=-- -
From: BUacono@aol.com [mailto:BUacono @aol.com]
Sent: Sunday, April '17, 2005 11:13 PM
To: mtfe r@e
senmaieschelon.com
Subject: Gymnasium Proposal
(Maria, would you please forward this message to appropriate persons at Edina.City Hall? Thank you.)
We are homeowners within 5.00 feet of the Edina Community Center Campus, and we are writing to express
our concerns about the proposal to add two additional gymnasiums at the Community Center Campus.
As parents of two.middle school boys who have always been very active Edina youth athletics, we fully support
providing all necessary athletic fields and facilities, as long as the safety and well -being of our neighborhoods
are not out at risk in the process.
Our main concerns are traffic safety and parking availability for users of the additional gyms (as well as the
numerous other gyms and theaters on the campus). This past summer's traffic and parking fiasco
(concentrated on the 4800 block of W. 59th Street and the streets leading to' it) due to the re- location of youth
soccer to McCarthy Field is something that should not be repeated on a regular basis.. 'To this day, Lam
thankful (and somewhat amazed) that there was not a serious injury or death due to the excessive speeds, the
driving and parking on the wrong side of the street, the children darting out from between parked cars, the
hurried parents turning around in private driveways where neighborhood children were playing, etc., etc. And
to think of this happening during winter months when our already narrow streets -are even narrower because of
snow drifts is unimaginable!
We urge you to consider other options and locations that would not put the safety and.well -being of our
residential neighborhoods at risk.
Thank you.
Beth and David Iacono
4813 W. 59th Street
Edina'
4/18/2005
jenniter,
Please forward this to Council, Mr. Keprios, Mr. Hughes, Mr. Larson, Mr. Houle and Mr. Lillehaug, for the
4/19/2005 council meeting.
Thanksl
---- -Original Message—
From: mominglory081129 @comcast. net [ mailto :mominglory081129 @comcast.net]
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 8:25 AM
To: edinamail @ci.edina.mmus
Cc: mtfesenmaler @eschelon.com
Subject: Community Center Complex proposal input
Hello,
We've lived at the intersection of 58th Street and Ashcroft Avenue for 2 years. We bought into this
neighborhood because we have 2 children, and it seemed to have the ideal sense of tranquility,
security, community, and convenience that we sought. Now these reasons appear to be strongly
threatened by the Community Center Complex proposal that is under consideration.
We've been concerned for some time about the proposed widening of our street from the current 28 feet
to 32 feet, against the wishes of us or any of our neighbors. We, nor our neighbors, have any desire for
a parking bay to be located directly across the street of our home. We've felt for some time that this will
only serve to invite non - neighbors to park near our home, threatening our security. Now we've learned
why the city wants to add more parking to our neighborhood: because of the Commercial Sports Facility
proposal. We feel that were being steamrolled into something that we don't want to live with, and don't
want to pay for.
We are very concerned about this threat to our neighborhood. Our road widening problem is a strictly a
means to increase the number of parking for non- neighbors, and we are to pay for it. It appears that
the city still plans to widen our street, against the surveyed desires of all of our neighbors. The proposal,
apparently in advanced stages, to build a Commercial Sports Facility at the school complex at the end of
our street involves the construction of 5 indoor sports facilities which will be hosting practices, games,
and tournaments up to 7 nights per week and up to 10:30 PM nightly, with hundreds of additional car
driving thru our neighborhood daily. Traffic impact studies rejected our neighborhood as suitable for
even 2 additional gyms, but the City Planning Commission is moving forward with the plan regardless
of this rejection. Our property value, our neighborhood's safety and security, and our overall quality of
lif a are all most certainly on the line. Every reason we bought into this neighborhood is threatened,
despite the fact that we've put significant time, effort, and expense into remodeling our house into the
place that we planned to call home for years. We ask the City Council to please reject the proposal to
add any additional gym space to the project already committed to. A more suitable location or split
locations can certainly be found. Please consider how you would feel if this was your quality of life at
stake.
We also ask the the City Council NOT approve the plan to widen 58th Street to 32 feet. We wish the
street width to remain at the current 28 feet, to maintain slower driving speeds and to discourage on
street parking of non - neighbors. The speed issue speaks for itself, and non - neighbor parking will
compromise our security. Our yards are also at risk. Our front yard, facing 58th Street, is quite narrow
enough, as anyone driving by can observe. We do not wish vehicles to be driving any closer to our
home than they already are, as it we hear each and every vehicle that speeds by as it is with the current
street width. Our neighbors across the street do not want to lose their beautiful mature trees, which
provide us all with pleasant shade in the summertime. Please consider our quality of life in making your
decision.
We will be in attendance at the April 19 City Council meeting, and reaffirm our wishes at that time.
PLEASE consider our concerns as if they were your own.
Sincerely,
Moira and Joshua Olson
5801 Ashcroft Avenue
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 5:39 PM
To: 'jbennerotte @ci.edina.mn.us'
Subject: RE: ECCNA Member - Important Message
Jennifer,
Please forward this to Council, Mr. Keprios, Mr. Hughes, Mr. Larson, Mr. Houle and Mr. Lillehaug, for the
4/19/2005 council meeting.
Thanks!
---- -Original Message---- -
From: Wessy0l @aol.com [mailto:Wessy0l @ aol.com]
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 5:27 PM
To: mtfesenmaler @eschelon.com
Subject: Re: ECCNA Member - Important Message
April 17, 2005
Edina City Council: Mayor, Jim Hovland
Council Member Scot Housh
Council Member Alice Hulbert
Council Member Linda Masica
Council Member Ann Swenson
Again you continue to target the same small area of Edina for public use. We have lived in this
neighborhood for over 20 years and feel that we and most other neighbors have been excellent hosts
for many sports and school events year after year. Now with the addition of new facilitates to the
Community Center and South View we will deal with more. When it was just Edina student and parents
we were willing to continue to be good neighbors. However, the "game" has now changes with the city
wanting to add facilities that will be open for general use. Please seriously consideration that you
continue to cause great strain on the traffic and general congestion In this neighborhood. We have
been pushed as far as we can and are now ready to "fight back ". I am asking you to do your job and
consider the information below and take another look Into the issues at hand. We do not want to build a
problem that can not be reversed. Neighborhood safety In Edina should be your number one
consideration not finding ways to make room for commercial sports facilities next to our schools and
homes. We feel strongly enough about this to personally "beat the pavement" before the next elections
If it appears we have elected officials who are not Interested in our families and neighborhoods welfare.
Please seriously consider these facts, do appropriate studies and consider the
children who go to school and families who live in this neighborhood. Given the
limited road space and options available once a decision has been made to add these
facilities it will be very difficult to "fix" after the fact.
Thank You for your consideration,
Bill Essendrup
4717 School Road
r_I!_ - ■ ■•I I.I. IA•
Jennifer,
Please forward this to Council, Mr. Keprios, Mr. Hughes, Mr. Larson, Mr. Houle and Mr. Lillehaug, for the
4/19/2005 council meeting.
Thanksl
— Original Message---- -
From: Joanredhed @aol.com [mailto:Joanredhed @aol.com]
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 11:21 AM
To: jhoogenakker @ci.edina.mn.us
Cc: mtfesenmaler @eschelon.com
Subject: Gymnasium hearing
To Whom It May Concern,
I am writing to express my views on the addition of two more gymnasiums in my neighborhood.
I am very much against adding more traffic and more parking issues to a neighborhood already dealing with a
more than fair share. We've known for years that traffic was a frustrating issue along our street, and that was
confirmed when our neighborhood was identified as having a significant traffic problem in 1999. Nothing has been
done to ease the problem in 6 years.
I also understand that there's a belief that we need two more gyms, but I also hear that school population is
declining. Ask yourself what we always ask ourselves as homeowners with budgets. Is this a need or a want, and
what is the priority it is setting? Sports are important, but we keep sending the message that sports are more
important than almost anything else in this community. How does the importance of sports compare with
neighborhood safety, or the sense of quiet community we hope to keep, or keeping taxes down? Again, as
someone who grew up without a lot of money, I also think it's important to separate want from need. There are
some things in this life that it's okay to get along without ... and to work around. This might be one of them. Or
maybe there's a another neighborhood that would like to share some of their green space or quiet streets with the
rest of the city. While we're grateful for easy access to the schools and community center, and we knew it was
there when we moved in, we are now taking on more traffic from new construction already going on, and the
exponential growth that would come with constant and concurrent games and practices at two new gymnasiums
is an undue burden.
My husband and I are in the process of deciding whether to make significant improvements to our home, but now
feel a need to reconsider. Why would we want a front porch to sit and look at increased traffic and parked cars on
our street, when the reason we wanted it was for an increased sense of connection to our neighborhood?
As for the study that was commissioned, I think it's your obligation to us as the people who put faith in you, to use
integrous information when putting a study together. After many years in news, I know that any study can support
just about anything by adding or deleting information. You can play that game and win, but at what cost?
Certainly, reputation and integrity are at stake if you knowingly make an easy decision supported by flawed
information. Edina has a wonderful reputation, and I would certainly expect more from you as its representatives.
Please use all the pertinent information when doing your study and then consider it all when making your
decision.
Thank yogi for your attention,
Joan Steffend Brandmeier
5605 Dalrymple Road
Edina, MN 55424
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 5:28 PM
To: 'jbennerotte @ci.edina.mmus'
Subject: FW: Safety in my neighborhood
Jennifer,
Please forward this to Council, Mr. Keprios, Mr. Hughes, Mr. Larson, Mr. Houle and Mr.
Lillehaug, for the 4/19/2005 council meeting.
Thanks!
- -_ -- Original Message--- -
From: Lisa Moeller ( mailto :lisamoeller @olgschool.net]
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 9:40 AM
To: edinamail @ci.edina.mn.us
Cc: mtfesenmaier @eschelon.com
Subject:'Safety in my neighborhood
Dear.Mr. Hovland and Council Members,
I am extremely concerned about the .safety of my neighborhood. We moved to
the ECC (not-country club) neighborhood 10 years ago when our first baby was
11 months old. We loved being within WALKING distance of EFCE, the Library
and Church We have learned to enjoy football season by first walking our
babies up to the game to peek in the fence and now I accompany my 9 and 11
year olds inside to watch the games. It is noisy, but fun.
We have learned to adapt to football season and understood football season
before we bought our house. We are not prepared to live in the noise,
unsafe situations that football season brings on a year round basis. After
Football games, we have collected alcohol bottles and cans from our yard and
the frontage road. I have had my front step (door bell included) urinated
on by partying teenage boys .... try explaining that disgusting situation to
you children. We have also witnessed a pedestrain flying through the air
after being hit by a driver during football season. We do not need any more
traffic in our neighborhood, our streets are small and you are risking the
lives of the many small children on our block who like to bike, scooter,
explore and walk their dogs. Currently, people drive very FAST down our
street speeding to pick up their precious children, with little regard for
our precious children.
There is so much traffic in the morning, that I can't even let our 11 year
old daughter walk across Southview Lane to Southview School. I simply
cannot believe the unsafe traffic conditions that are being proposed for our
neighborhood. If there are more gyms, the community center / Southview will
turn into a sports complex crammed /rammed into a neighborhood with small,
narrow residential streets, no main, large roads and inadequate parking.
With hundreds of people traveling into our small neighborhood from
surrounding cities and suburbs our streets and neighborhood will be put at
risk .for, accidents, extreme traffic and crowding and: exposing our children
needlessly to danger. Really are sports and gyms the most important
and they i.ability to be a pedestrian? U happened to safety, peace
priority in. our community
fo. our chil dren. What
Use your brains, there must be a safer
option for the addition of Sports Space..How about the Braemar area? I can
travel by car to Braemar without even going through a residential
neighborhood. Sports Centers in other communities are not crammed into
existing small neighborhoods.
As a mother and a teacher, I am concerned about the safety of all children
everywhere. I beg you to reconsider the site and really reevaluate the
situation. If you have children, please consider my children and the
children of the Community Center neighborhood.
of you. Do the right thing.
Sincerely,
Lisa Moeller
I would do the same for any
Jennifer,
Please forward this to Council, Mr. Keprios, Mr.' Hughes, Mr. Larson, Mr. Houle and Mr. Lillehaug, for the
4/19/2005 council meeting.
Thanks!
- - -- Original Message---- -
From: Wessy0l @aol.com [mailto:Wessy0l @aol.com]
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 5:27 PM
To: mtfesenmaier @eschelon.com
Subject: Re: ECCNA Member - Important Message
Edina City Council: Mayor, Jim Hovland
Council Member Scot Housh
Council Member Alice Hulbert
Council Member Linda Masica
Council. Member Ann Swenson
Please take Into consideration the neighborhood that you continue to cause great strain on the traffic.
ask you to consider the Information below and take another look Into the transportation Issues at hand.
We do not want to,. build a problem that can not be reversed. Safety in Edina should be our number one
consideration.
Why the Edina Community Center Neighborhood Association opposes this plan:
• The ECC neighborhood was identified as a significant traffic problem area in 1999 ...nothing has
changed since then, except the addition of more traffic!
• The two additional gyms were added to construction plans after last year's referendum was passed
with a no vote by area Edina residents.
• The city commissioned a traffic study, but the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) unanimously
rejected the study as flawed. Yet, the City Planning Commission and City Council are going ahead,
ignoring the Transportation Commission's rejection.
• The flawed study looked at the effect of the two new gyms only ... not the impact of what would become
5 indoor sport areas that could host as many as 7 concurrent school or city- sponsored practices, games,
or tournaments drawing even more traffic through one concentrated area ... our neighborhood.
• In the study, only 2 practices or games per gym, per night, were assumed. The original rental plan
presented to Council, projected 6 practices or games in one gym, 4 in the other, each nightl Again, this
Will add significantly more traffic than the study projects.
• Original plans did not include weekend tournaments ... that's changed, along with a concession stand in
the revised plan. Events will start as early as 4pm and end as late as 10:30 pm, 7 days a week.
• For weekend tournaments, the study's projections are considerably lower than they should be ... again,
because it'considers only the 2 additional gyms.
• The study ignored the impact of other activities on traffic flow that will increase with the renovations at
Southview and the Community Center (theatre, music, other rec programs) that will of course grow as
time goes on.
• The study considered the effect of traffic on a very limited area. Increased traffic on Valley View Rd. was
not even considered relevant.
Please make your decision based on the traffic and not on personal desires.
Thank you,
Sandy Essendrup
4717 School Road
Edina, MN 55424
. y,
Jennifer,
Please forward this to Council, Mr. Keprios, Mr. Hughes, Mr. Larson, Mr. Houle and Mr. Lillehaug, for the
4/19/2005 council meeting.
Thanks!
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: chris wichman [mailto:chris wich @yahoo.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2005 12:37 PM
To: edinamail @ci.edina.mn.us
Cc: mtfesenmaier @eschelon.com
Subject: Re: Additional Gym Construction at South View Middle School C-0502
Re: Additional Gym Construction at South View Middle School C -0502
My wife and I both live across the street from South View Middle School, right across
the street at 5617 St. Andrews Avenue. We both are very disappointed, close to
infuriated about the consideration of additional construction of more gyms at the
school. We both went through this once before 3 years ago and are greatly annoyed
that this is being done again. What is more upsetting is the fact that this was defeated
once before and the money expenditure has not been voted upon by the public. It is
even going to cost 1 million dollars more.
There is a traffic and parking problem here at the middle school and we as residents
take the brunt of the problem. Every Saturday and Sunday and in the weekday
evenings, my street is stuffed with SUV's and people cruising around looking for a
place to park so they can do the gym or activity at the school. Every football game, it is
worse. And to add to the problem, when there is a football game, both sides of the
streets are chock full of cars making it very hard to get down the street.
If you consider adding a multilevel car park, you may solve your parking problem, but I
doubt if it is cost effective and you still have to deal with the traffic on residential streets.
Now you still have to get all those cars and people in and out of they area, and we
come to safety. The roads are not designed for the traffic flow. Construction of the
gyms will bring in more traffic and keep it there longer crowding the area
neighborhood. I do not include the addtional traffic issue caused by the recent
renovation of the swimming pool and auditorium in the community center. This is
residential and I really resent the fact that you are turning into more of a Lifetime
Fitness Center without a parking lot. Do a traffic study for all the hours concerned (a
proper one, not an experts guess and include the recent improvements to the school
that will bring more people in ll). And don't be so hypocritical about this, since the city
is considering traffic calming and redirection for other parts of town, why shift it over
here.
These gyms belong in the Braemar area and not here. Get it through your heads that
this neighborhood does not want the gyms, the traffic and the parking problems here. I
note the proponents do not live here and will drive here to use it. I don't see them
leaving the cars behind and walking.
Do not build these gyms. Get public referendum approval and if you must have them,
move them to Braemar. What part of NO do you not understand.
Chris and Teri Wichman
5617 St. Andrews Avenue
Edina, MN 952 - 927 -8224
Page 1 of 1
From: Roebuck, Lisa [WRoebuck @CBBURNET.COM]
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 9:40 PM
To: edinamail @ci.edina.mn.us
Cc: mtfesenmaier @eschelon.com
Subject: Proposal to Add Additional Gyms
Dear Mayor Hovland and Council Members,
Allow me to tell you what bothers me about this proposal. This neighborhood told you, several years ago, in no
uncertain terms, that it DID NOT WANT a dome over its football field or a mega - structure of gyms to rent out to
the community. You heard us, the plans were scrapped, and more recently we agreed with the need for certain
changes to our schools and community center. Now I find out that what you couldn't bring in the front door, you're
trying to sneak in the back. I do not want these extra gyms shoved down my throat. They don't belong here.
They belong at Braemar, where there is space to put them and little risk to the surrounding residents.
Don't assume that I reject this proposal because my children aren't athletes. My daughter was a captain of the
tennis team and won two state championships. My son was a varsity tennis player and his team won state twice.
My youngest daughter plays lacrosse and tennis. We know the importance of athletic involvement better than
anybody, but these gyms will not improve our children's lives. On the contrary, you will turn this neighborhood
into a three -ring circus and I truly believe this is a recipe for disaster.
This neighborhood, with its curvy streets, limited stop signs and lack of sidewalks, is tricky even for its own
residents. As each of my children has learned to drive, I have felt the need to stress, over and over, the danger of
driving carelessly in this neighborhood, where children on bikes and people with dogs circle Lake Harvey, in the
street, even in the dark. You bring in a large number of outsiders who don't know the neighborhood, the streets,
the patterns of its residents, at a time when a sporting event has ended, it's dark out, people are tired, annoyed,
happy, celebrating, whatever.... it's a crisis waiting to happen.
Am I speaking from experience? I was hit broadside at an unmarked intersection in this neighborhood six years
ago by a young man. He was on his cell phone calling for directions because he was lost, he approached the
intersection and saw me but, as he told the policeman, he assumed I had a stop sign because he didn't, so he
plowed into me. I spent months in physical therapy. A child on a bicycle will not be so lucky.
Please consider what the residents of this neighborhood are saying to you. We are not whiners. We love our
homes, our town, our schools. We have always stepped up when you asked us to help support a change for the
better. Please, do the right thing. These additional gyms are too much for this area.
Sincerely,
Lisa Roebuck - Krasno
5607 Dalrymple Road
952 - 922 -9164
MJ
4
0
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # IV. A
From: Craig Larsen Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Date: April 19, 2005 Mgr. Recommends F-1 To HRA
❑To Council
Subject: Conditional Use Permit for Action o ®Motion
Good Samaritan Church, [:]Resolution
Grove Street
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Recommendation:
The Planning Commission recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit.
Info /Background:
See attached Planning Commission minutes, staff report, plans and correspondence.
At the direction of the Planning Commission, staff and representatives of the church visited
the site to determine if additional landscaping could reasonably be added to the site. The
results are summarized in the attached memo from Jan Anderson, landscape architect for
the church project.
O
LOCATION MAP
DUNDEE RD
0
N
W
Y
3
r
HAWKES TER
O
O�
OHO
WAD
Subject
Site
0
W
U.
E ST U
0
z
O
co
z
x
O
> LYLE CIR
> a
O H
ca ca co
¢ BENTON AVE
Edina Overview
C -05-3
Conditional Use Permit
Good Samaritan UMC
5730 Grove Street
DRAFT MINUTES PC MEETING
MARCH 30, 2005
C-05 -3 Conditional Use Permit
Good Samaritan Church
5730 Grove Street
Church building expansion
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the applicant is proposing a new
addition extending north from the westerly end of the existing church building and
a new entry, lobby area adjacent to the east parking lot. No changes to existing
parking areas are proposed.
Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use
Permit subject to watershed district permits.
Mr. David Knutson, Mr. Hamilton and Mr. Timmer were present
representing the church.
Commissioner Schroeder noted it appears on the landscaping plan that a
significant number of large oak trees will be removed with minimal replacement.
Mr. Knutson addressed the Commission and explained a letter was mailed
to neighbors surrounding the church site inviting them to attend a meeting on
November 30, 2004 to view and discuss the proposal. Continuing, Mr. Knutson
acknowledged that unfortunately a large number of trees will be removed as a
result of expansion, but pointed out the site is large with many trees that will not
be disturbed as a result of this proposal.
A discussion ensued with Commissioners in agreement the proposed
additions to the church are tastefully, but voiced concern with regard to
landscaping
Commissioner Schroeder moved to recommend Conditional Use Permit
Approval subject to the building plans presented, subject to watershed district
permits and subject to replacement of 26 large oak trees with 26 additional trees.
Commissioner Lonsbury seconded the motion and requested that approval also
be conditioned on matching exterior materials. Commissioner Schroeder said
that was his intent and agreed exterior materials should match.
Commissioner Brown added he agrees with Commissioner Schroeder's
suggestion of requiring additional landscaping.
Commissioner Grabiel stated he is hesitant to support the motion as
presented. He asked church representatives if they believe there is enough
room on site to support the planting of 26 additional trees. Mr. Hamilton
responded a landscaping plan was submitted with the intent of adding additional
plantings but not to the extent as suggested by Commissioner Schroeder.
Continuing, Mr. Hamilton said with regard to exterior building materials that they
would match the existing church buildings. Commissioner Grabiel said he
agrees with Commissioner Schroeder with regard to tree replacement but is
uncomfortable with the recommendation of replacing tree for tree, especially
since the church has met landscaping code requirements.
Commissioner Schroeder stated he understands Commissioner Grabiel's
comments adding he does not know the correct number of trees that should be
replanted but the Commission should note Edina is an older community with
aging trees and vegetation and when we can the Commission should try to
maintain our urban forest. Commissioner Grabiel responded he doesn't disagree
with that comment.
Chair Workinger asked Mr. Grabiel what approach would make the most
sense to him.
Commissioner Grabiel suggested that the Commission direct staff to
review the existing vegetation keeping in mind what will be removed. He added
this subject (landscaping) may need more visibility but having this discussion
now may not be fair to this applicant especially in light of their compliance with
code.
Mr. Steve Timmer, church member addressed the Commission and
explained to them the building task force agonized over tree removal but nothing
could be done about it because of the proposed placement of the new addition.
He stated at this time it would be a hardship for the church to replace tree for tree
and asked the Commission to not request tree /tree replacement as a condition of
approval.
Commissioner Lonsbury stated as he views this the Commission can
either act on the motion on the table, deny the request or table this issue until an
additional landscaping plan is presented. Mr. Hamilton asked the Commission to
note the church has met all requirements set forth by City Code. Commissioner
Losnbury stated he agrees but in his opinion the landscaping plan is not
adequate.
Commissioner Schroeder explained his intent with his motion was to
ensure that additional landscaping is added above what was depicted on the
landscaping plan. He added he does not want to tell the church how to achieve
this recommendation and suggested that a possibility in adding more
landscaping would be as a youth group activity that would plant seedlings. He
stated he would love to see the large trees replaced with other large trees
acknowledging that is probably not a possibility.
Mr. Larsen interjected adding he believes an option worth considering is to
have planning staff walk the site with the City forester and church officials
identifying the trees that will be lost as a result of this proposal and requesting if
warranted that the church revise their landscaping plan to add additional
plantings of undertimed size.
Commissioner Schroeder withdrew his previous motion and moved to
recommend Conditional Use Permit approval subject to staff conditions, subject
to matching exterior building materials and subject to planning staff, the city
forester and church officials walking the church site to determine what trees will
be removed and agreeing on the amount of replacements trees and vegetation.
Commissioner Lonsbury seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried.
Commissioner Grabiel questioned being new to the Commission
Watershed approval. Mr. Larsen responded watershed approval is triggered by
the amount of grading and disruption that will occur on a site as a result of
development or redevelopment. The watershed district reviews plans to ensure
that water quality standards are met and to measure the rate of water run -off.
Regular Meeting of the
Edina Planning Commission
Wednesday, March 30, 2005, 7:00 PM
Edina City Hall Council Chambers
4801 West 50th Street
Number:
C -05 -3
Location:
North of Grove Street and east of Wycliffe Road
Applicant:
Good Samaritan Church
5730 Grove Street
Request:
Conditional Use Permit to allow addition to existing church building.
Proposed Addition:
The application illustrates a new addition extending north from the westerly end
of the existing building. The single story addition would house a multi - purpose
room, changing rooms and two resource rooms. The plans also show a new
entry, lobby area adjacent to the east parking lot. No changes to existing parking
areas are proposed.
Zoning Compliance:
Both additions comply with the required 50 -foot setback. Proposed exterior
materials comply with ordinance standards.
Parking:
The base parking demand is determined by the sanctuary that will not be
changed. The activities planned for the addition would not coincide with Sunday
services. Attached is a schedule of activities provided by the church. It includes
planned activities for the addition called the family life center.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit subject to:
e Watershed District permits
Page 1 of 2
Craig Larsen
From: Jan Anderson [JAnderson @htpo.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 5:30 PM
To: Craig Larsen
Subject: Memo - Meeting 4- 7- 05.doc
MEMORANDUM
To: Craig Larsen
From: Jan Anderson
Re: Good Samaritan Church - Edina
Summary of Meeting
Date: April 7, 2005 at 10:00 am
In Attendance:
City of Edina Forester Tom Hormath
City of Edina Planning Dept. Craig Larsen
Good Samaritan Roger Acton
HTPO Inc. Jan Anderson
• Twenty -four trees are being removed for the new addition and the Planning
Commission would like to see some additional trees planted on the site. The
Commission suggested that young small trees be planted. Since the site is wooded,
space for new trees is limited, and it was agreed that the church would plant around
twenty or so young trees (any size) in the existing wooded area.
• The forester provided a list of shade tolerant trees: American Linden, Hackberry,
Ironwood, Kentucky Coffeetree, Sugar Maple, River Birch, Serviceberry, Pin Cherry,
Chokecherry, and Pagoda Dogwood. Roger informed us that the church is currently
taking action to remove buckthorn from the wooded areas.
• In addition to the young trees, it was decided to plant 2 larger (2.5" B &B) Swamp White
Oak trees on each side of the walkway to the new church addition off Wycliffe Road.
Trees are to be planted on church property and not in the street right -of -way. There are 2
existing Russian Olives and 1 stump along Wycliffe Road that will need to be removed.
The Russian Olives are being removed because they are at the end of their lifespan, and
removing them will give the new trees more space to grow. Removal of stumps,
repairing of the ground, and reseeding where disturbed, will be done.
• Craig Larsen also confirmed that church landscape plans can be used with HTPO's
4/8/2005
plans as long as the foundation plantings are installed around the new addition.
4/8/2005
Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 1
Roger Acton
From: 'Roger Acton" <lewisandlee @hotmail.com>
To: <clarsen @ci.edina.mn.us>
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 2:54 PM
Subject: Good Samaritan UMC Building Project
Dear Mr. Larsen,
You have requested an outline of the steps taken by the Church to notify our neighbors of our plans to expand our
facilities @ 5730 Grove St, Edina. I offer the following:
Early in the process we determined that keeping our neighbors informed was very important to our cause. We
then obtained from the city a mailing list of all addresses within 500ft of the Church in preparation for future
contacts.
On Jan. 14,2004 we sent the attached letter to all those on the mailing list to alert them to our intentions.
Upon completion of the detailed design in the fall of 2004 we once again wrote to all of those on our mailing list
inviting them to an openhouse at the Church to view our plans, a model of the project & a power point
presentation explaining the details. Refreshments were served. A copy of our invitation letter is attached. No
attendance record was kept at the open house, however we believe that 10 to 12 households accepted our
invitation. Building Committee members gave each attendee individual attention, explaining the project &
answering questions. There were no negative comments from any of our guests.
I believe this covers the activities we discussed. If you have questions or wish additional information please call
me at 952/ 831 -7878.
ger L. Acton, Chair
Building Committee
Good Samaritan UMC
PS I will deliver copies of the 2 attachments to your office Friday morning, 4/15/05.
4/14/2005
January 14, 2004
Dear Friends and Neighbors,
Early in 2003 the Long Range Planning Committee of Good Samaritan United Methodist
Church determined that the church's facilities are in need of repair and updating.
Handicap accessibility, rehabilitation and updating are the major areas of concern.
A Building Committee was formed in April 2003 and an architect was consulted to
determine if and how the building could be updated to meet today's codes. After much
discussion the building committee determined that the West and East entrances required
small additions to make the church more accessible to people with disabilities. The east
entrance addition will also permit us to have a nursery near the Sanctuary. Also there
will be roof repairs, electrical and plumbing updates, kitchen relocation and additions.
A family life center will be added on the north side of the existing structure.
On January 13d' our congregation authorized us to proceed with a detailed design, secure
construction bids and conduct a fund raising drive. Upon completion of these steps we
will present our recommendations to the congregation for a final vote authorizing'us to
proceed. No actual construction will begin prior to this final authorization.
While the day the first shovel of dirt is taken is a long way off we want you to know
what we are thinking and planning. Our relationship with you is very important to us. If
you have any concerns or questions, please contact us through the church office.
We will continue tokeep you informed as we make progress on our revitalization projop(.
Building Committee
Good Samaritan United Methodist Church
November 16, 2004
Dear Neighbors of Good Samaritan UMC,
Some months ago we sent you a letter informing you of our church's plan
to upgrade and expand our church . After devising tentative plans and a
successful monetary campaign, the congregation voted to move forward
with the project.
Currently final plans are being drawn and financing is being secured. The
final congregational vote of approval will occur in the Spring of 2005. With
final approval, construction would begin in May, 2005.
As promised we want to keep you informed of our plans. Therefore, on
November 300' at 7:00 PM you are invited to preview our improvement
plans. There will an open house style viewing of plans and members of our
Building Committee to answer you questions. Come for as long as you
want, see a paper version of our plans and have your questions answered.
There will be FREE child care from 7:00 to 8:00 PM
If you have questions please call Ben at 952- 929 -0049.
Sincerely,
Good Samaritan UMC Building Committee
M1
5621 Wycliffe Road
Edina, MN 55436
April 11, 2005
Mr. James Hovland, Mayor
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Mr. Hovland:
I am writing with regard to the proposed addition to Good Samaritan Church. I am
writing with three main concerns and related requests.
First, from my perspective, communication about the proposal has been confusing and
information difficult to obtain on a project that appears to be moving at high speed. We
live five houses down from the church and on the same side of the street. When the
signs were posted, we asked neighbors we saw in the neighborhood what they knew of
the project. No one seemed to know. We asked two neighbors that we knew attended the
church and they were sketchy about the details and unsure of what to say. Within
approximately a week my wife called the city planning office to learn more. She
received unclear and minimizing information about the project. She was eventually told
that the project was 50' by 80', would run along the backside of the building and that the
playground area wouldn't be impacted. She was told that the church had the proposed
plans posted in their lobby for viewing. She was not told about an impending planning
commission meeting for further information or any process for public discussion. On
Sunday, April 3`d I walked into the church to locate the plans and after 15 minutes of
searching in earnest found none. I visited the city planning office on Friday, April 8. I
persisted in obtaining a copy of the plan. When I asked whether there was an opportunity
for public discussion, the answer was not clear but it became apparent that things were
moving quickly. Trying to understand the process took effort. I learned the church had
held a "courtesy" neighborhood meeting on Dec. 2, 2004, although we weren't invited
and I'm not clear who was. I learned that there was a planning commission meeting
held recently although I'm not sure when. I know it occurred somewhere over the busy
Easter /Spring break period for many people and for us also a funeral. However, I was
clearly told that it occurred after the minimum 10 -day waiting period from the date the
signs were said to have been posted. It seemed that any discussion period, if there was
one, had for all practical purposes closed since the planning commission meeting had
occurred and the forester had even walked the property. I was told that the only event
left to participate in was the city council meeting and that this was really to make a final
decision. The suggestion was that the decision was likely a foregone conclusion since
there were no variances required by the proposal. While we have subsequently received
notice of the city council meeting, this now makes me wonder why we didn't receive
notice of the planning commission meeting. Obviously, I am concerned about the
process of disseminating facts and information to an interested public. If there is a
process requiring public input, and it seems that the spirit of the legal process provides
for this, I'd like to request more time for that to occur because I have concerns and
questions about the impact to our neighborhood. I'd also like to suggest that
improvements be made on the process of informing the public when building proposals
such as this are made. The process appears to require the permit applicant to put up signs
notifying the public. I'd like to request that these signs identify that it's a conditional use
building permit and that they provide information about the public review process steps
and time periods so that the public knows how and how quickly they need to get
involved.
Second, I am concerned about the impact the proposed addition will have on the traffic
and parking in the neighborhood. We have four small children. We routinely walk
around the neighborhood as a family with our strollers and dog, our kids walk to and
from school events and often are riding bikes and playing in the streets and yards of
Wycliffe Road. We are not alone in this. It is a common practice for the many families,
especially those with small children. The addition of a gymnasium (and possible future
additions) is only undertaken to increase usage of the church and of course would be a
means to attempt to grow attendance at the church. The church may also attempt to use
the proposed addition to as an extra source of income (or funding) from non - church
groups such as boy scout troops or sports organizations etc. seeking practice or playing
venue, again increasing usage of the church. Parking at the church on Sundays and other
events is already an issue. Adequate parking space is not available and the on- street
parking and traffic already create hazards. Increased attendance and usage of the church
would create additional on- street parking, traffic and hazards and on potentially more
days of the week. Given the design of the proposed addition, the natural place for users
of the gym to attempt to park is along Wycliffe, even if not allowed. Finally, it's not at
all unlikely that there will be nights when both the church and Countryside School have
events, creating even more parking issues and hazardous traffic.
Third, the proposed design not only protrudes perpendicular to the existing building, but
it expands toward the street an additional 36 feet. It will also be higher than the existing
facade facing Wycliffe. The aesthetic impact will be dramatic. There will be an
imposing 30+ foot tall brick wall, 36 feet closer to Wycliffe and running 140 feet nearly
parallel to it and protruding into a beautiful forested area. The footprint expansion from
the current building is an expansion in every dimension -- seemingly one of the most
impactful proposals possible. I am concerned about the sprawl of this proposal on the
neighborhood and of the possibility of future sprawl along Hawkes Lake. I request that
other less impactful designs be considered which can also be rationalized with the
parking situation. I would like to invite you to walk the grounds and road as I have and
imagine the impact to the neighborhood of the current proposal. I believe you will reach
the conclusion as I have that there must be a better alternative to consider 'to meet church
needs while minimizing the impact to the neighborhood.
In summary, I request further time to study alternatives that would minimize the impact
to the neighborhood and understand whether the intended uses are consistent with the
neighborhood. I request moving any addition away from Wycliffe and also not
protruding into the wooded area. I request that parking and traffic solutions be required
as well as recognition that this is a school zone and that this compounds the traffic and
parking issues. I request that for any trees removed replacement plantings of large size
be used to enhance aesthetics. Finally, I request modifications to the process of notifying
an interested public in situations such as this.
I look forward to your assistance and leadership in this matter. Thanks for your attention.
Yo 'Y'
X4
ary .Lee
Copy: I Hoogenakker, City of Edina Planning Dept.
caM , C . L.,, vs,,,
To: Craig Larson, City of Edina
From: Good Samaritan UMC
Re: Building proposal
Good Samaritan
fed Methodist Church
5730 Grove Street
Edina, Minnesota 55436
Good Samaritan United Methodist Church is hoping to undertake the construction
of our building project over the next two years. Starting two years ago with our long
range planning committee we started to see a need for an expanded building. When we
combined that with the need for updating some of our facilities and catching up on our
deferred maintenance we decided on forming a building committee. Over the last 2 years
we have researched what we would like, what we can afford, and what is the best
compromise. The goals of the building program are to create a new kitchen, nursery, and
family life center, and improve our offices, restrooms, narthex, and large meeting spaces.
We feel that the current design will allow us to do all those things as well as upgrade our
mechanical systems and stay within our budget.
The new family life center will allow us to expand our youth programs to include
sports and large gatherings. We also hope that the community would use the space for
basketball /volleyball leagues. We have already had some interest in using the family life
center for practicing golf during the winter. Attached is a calendar for what we see as
uses for the new family life center. Along with these uses we expect to see expanded use
of our large gathering space in our current building with the new kitchen. This kitchen
will allow a caterer to come in and prepare everything on site for up to 300 people. We
have also had a caterer that is interested in renting our kitchen to prepare meals that
would then be taken off site. Our large and small group spaces are used by outside groups
as meeting space about 10 -15 hours a week; we expect that with our new space that
wuuid more then double. We iook forward to being abie to offer this space to our
community for its use.
The Edina Family Center has been leasing classroom and nursery space for the
past few years from the church. The expanded building would allow them or a similar
group more space, access to a large muscle area, an expanded nursery toddler area, and
improved restrooms. We do not have an agreement with the Family Center due to their
funding and our construction schedule but we expect that within a year of finishing
construction we would have a group in the new building.
We all believe that Good Samaritan is a special place, filled with God's sustaining
love that supports us and permits us — impels us — to look outside our walls and love our
neighbors as ourselves, and minister to them like our namesake, the Good Samaritan. If
you have any questions please feel free to contact us at 952- 929 -0049.
952.929.0049
www.good.org
1. WORSHIP (1 Hour)
SUNDAY SERVICES
GOOD SAMARITAN
UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
CURRENT (2004) SPACE USAGE
Avg. High
Room I Space Attend. Attend
SPECIAUSEASONAL SERVICES
Ash Wednesday
9:00 am
Sanctu@a
225
379
Sept to June
10:30 am
Sanctuary
224
410
Easter Morning
5:30 DM
Fellowship Rm
15
37
10:00 am
Sanctuary
340
378
11:00 am
Sanctuary
350
405
Thanks ivin Eve
9:30 am
Sanctuary
222
280
June to Sept
5:30 pm I
Fellowship Rm
14
27
SPECIAUSEASONAL SERVICES
Ash Wednesday
7:00 pm
Sanctuary
130
144
Maundy Thursday
7:00 pm
Sanctuary
125
168
Easter Morning
9:00 am
Sanctuary
365
396
10:00 am
Sanctuary
340
378
11:00 am
Sanctuary
350
405
Thanks ivin Eve
7:00 pm
Sanctuary
100
125
Hanging of the
Greens (15t Sunday
in Advent )
5:00 pm
Sanctuary,
Fellowship Room
& narthexes
180
250
Christmas Eve
(Family Services)
4:00 pm
Sanctuary
275
332
5:00 pm
Sanctuary
165
212
June to Sept
Christmas Eve
(Candlelight Services)
9:00 m
Sanctua
339
375
11:00 pm
Sanctuary
230
283
11. SUNDAY CHRISTIAN EDUCATION (1 Hour)
Adult Class — weekly
7:45 am
Conference Rm
10
16
Adult Class — week
10:30 am
Fellowship Rm
20
32
Adult Class — month)
9:00 am
Fellowship Rm
60
125
Children & Youth (2yrs
old thru 8th grade)
9:00 am
Classrooms through-
out lower level
45
66
Sept to June
Children & Youth
same age range)
10 :30 am
(same space as above)
30
45
Infant S toddler nursery
9:00 am
2 nursery rooms in
lower level
7
12
Infant & toddler nurse
10:30 am
same space as above
6
1 12
June to Sept
Children (3 yrs. old thru
3'" grade)
9:30 am
Room 103 (classroom
beneath sanctuary)
22
37
Infant & toddler nursery
9:30 am
2 nursery rooms in
lower level
7
12
191. WEEKLY CHURCH ACTIVITIES
Mondays
9:30 -11:30 am
Adult Class
Fellowship Rm
11
12
Tuesda
9:30 -11:30 am
Bible Study
Fellowship Rm
18
35
Wednesdays
5:15 -7:00 pm
Meal
Kitchen/old narthex /
Samaritan Hall
45
70
6:00 -7:30 pm
Bell Choir
230
10
15
6:00 -6:45 pm
Alleluia Choir
103
20
25
Choristers Choir
105
12
15
Youth Choir
101
15
20
6:00 -7:00 pm
Adult Class
131
18
30
7:00 -8:00 pm
Confirmation
Fellowship Rm
15
24
BUZZ Jr. Hi.
Youth Rm
18
25
7:30 -9:00 pm
Adult Choir
101
.40
70
6:00 -9:15 pm
Child care
129
8
15
Thursda
5:45 -7:00 pm
Adult Class
Fellowship Rm
29
35
Fridays
8:45 -11:30 am
Women's Choir
Samaritan Hall
25 -30
40
IV. MONTHLY CHURCH ACTIVITIES & MEETINGS
A. Church Council meets once a month (2nd Tuesday, Sept. thru June) in the Fellowship Room, 7 -9 pm.
Avg. Attend. —12
High. Attend - 25
B. Several groups & committees meet on a monthly basis. These meetings generally begin at 7 pm and last
2 hours, on average. At most, 3 of these meetings might fall on the same night. Spaces reserved for
these individual committees are Fellowship Room, Conference Room, 131, 105 and Youth Room. For the
groups listed below, average attendance would be 8, with a. high attendance of 15.
Staff / Parish Relations Committee
Trustees
Long Range Planning
Membership
Reconciling. Comm ittee
Finance / Stewardship
Worship
Missions
Youth Council
Children's Council
Capital Campaign Committee (meets bi- weekly)
Building Committee (meets twice a month)
C. Fellowship groups that meet on a monthly basis at church generally begin at 7 pm and last for 2 -3
hours. These groups would meet in the Fellowship Room, Samaritan Hall or Youth Room.
Friday Night at the Movies (12 / 20)
4d' Tuesday Readers (10/15)
Adult Bridge Group (16 / 24)
(F or Sat night / not the same week as Friday Night at the Movies)
V. OUTSIDE GROUPS
In addition to the groups in the following table, Good Samaritan leases space to the Edina Family Center from
September thru May for their Early Childhood program. Their programs run Monday thru Friday, 9:30 am — 3:00 pm
(a morning session and an afternoon session) and follow the Edina school calendar. Total enrollment for their
program is 67 children, age 2 -5. The program also includes a parent education class and nursery care. The average
occupancy of this building by the.EFC is 27 persons; the highest occupancy would be 45 persons. The following
space is included in their lease: Rooms 103, 114, 116, 127, 128, and 131.
Scouts
Boy Scouts
Cub Scouts
Pack 68 mtg.
° leaders
° Den 3
Pack 168 mtg.
" leaders
° Den 1
Girl Scout Leaders
Monday (weekly)
7:00 -9:00 pm
Scout Room
20
35
3 Tuesday
7:00 -8:00 prn
Samaritan Hall
45
65
1 Tuesda
7:00 -8:00 pm
Scout Room
6
12
r Tuesday
7:00 -8:00 pm
Scout Room
7
10
3 Thursday
7:00 -8:00 pm
Samaritan Hall
40
65
-2m Thursday
7:00 -8:00 pm
Scout Room
6
10
1 Thursda
7:00 -8:00 pm
Scout Room
6
10
C Monday
6:30 -9:30 pm
Fellowship Room
35
50
SAMSNet
Wednesday wkly)
1:15 -3:00 pm
Fellowship Room
22
40
Golden K
Tuesday (wkly)
8:30 -10:30 am
Samaritan Hall
60
1
90
AA Men
Wednesday (wkly)
8:00 -9:30 pm
Scout Room
2
20
VI. OCCASIONAL & INTERMITTENT EVENTS
U.M.W. (United Methodist Women) Dinner & Program
Once a year / Saturday night
Samaritan Hall
Avg. Attendance —150
Highest Attendance — 224
U.M.W. Luncheons
3 times a year / Thursdays or Saturdays
Fellowship Room or Samaritan Room
Avg. Attendance — 45
Highest Attendance —115
Grandparent/Grandchild Late Night
Once a year (Jan. or Feb.) / Friday evening, 6:00 -9:00 pm
Samaritan Hall, Fellowship Room, narthexes & kitchen
Avg. Attendance — 95
Highest Attendance -130
Funerals
Monday — Saturday
Sanctuary — Service
Fellowship Room, Samaritan Hall, narthexes & kitchen — reception time
Avg. Attendance —150
Highest Attendance — 650
Weddings & rehearsals
Rehearsals — generally Friday evening
Sanctuary
Avg. Attendance —15
Highest Attendance — 45
Wedding ceremonies — generally Saturday afternoon & evening
Sanctuary
Avg. Attendance — 225
Highest Attendance — 400
Sample Weekly Calander for Family Life Center
These would be programs that we would hope to have in place in the first year of operation. Times
and days may vary depending on each program.
Items in italics would be open to the public.
Time
Sun Mon
Tue Wed
Thu
Fri , Sat
Early Bird
Early Bird
Early Bind
Early Bind
Early Bird
7AM -8AM
Walkers
Walkers
Walkers
Walkers
Walkers
8AM -9AM
Aerobics
Aerobics
Aerobics
Aerobics
Aerobics
9AM -10AM
PreSch000l
PreSch000l
PreSch000l
PreSch000l
PreSch000l
10AM -11 AM
Gym
Gym
Gym
Gym
Gym
11 AM -NOON
NOON -1 PM
Open Gym
O n G m
1 PM -2PM
Open Gym
O n Gym
2PM -3PM
Open Gym
Open Gym
After School
Alter School
After School
After School
After School
3PM -4PM
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Open Gym
After School
After School
After School
After School
After School
4PM -5PM
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Open Gym
After School
After School
After School
After School
After School
5PM -6PM
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Wed. Night
Middle
6PM -7PM
Program
School night
Wed. Night
Middle
7PM -8PM
Open Gym
O n Gym
Program
Open G m
School night
Edina
Basketball
Wed. Night
Middle
8PM -9PM
Assocation
Open q"
Program
Open Gym
School night
Edina
Basketball
Middle
9PM -10PM
Assocation
Open Gym
Open Gym
School night
10PM -11 PM
--------- -77 v V 1 IN
Vt,
230.10(MEA5
-(D HAWKE5
o LAKE
-'
10
\0
E"\
Xr,�INGIIAI - -- ---
:2 AREA 0101ED
30' ROADWAY EA5EKIENT
PER DOC.
NO.3264580
C,
C)
w
LLI
ILL
ILL
FTJ
N EW 5UILPlNU'
XBTiNG
M I APAGE
FUTURE---
PATIO
10
\
EX15TV-6
�
5DEWALK
6 "l- 1 i
NEW
51OEWALK
0
I 113
Em-wM--1
1EX-15TIN05TEr5
EXISTING
SIDEWALK
❑ Lj Ij
1 55 TOTAL EXISTING STALLS
SITE PLAN
G R O V E
STREET
NEW CONG
STAIRS AND
IPTALR LING5
o
NEW1301- N�
EXISTING
5VEWALK
lo
496.69 (MEA5)
EX15TNO
TlZA5H AREA
NEW SIDEWALK CONC CURB
HDCP
X15TINGNTUNII
f'ARKINr,LQT
ONCRE;E WALK
F()cp
HDcp
24121
104 TOT
- 5TALLS AL EXISTING
25
0=
0 5'10'15' 30'
cfl
II
I
W*
9
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR CON5TRUCT ]ON
STATION
NINETEEN
Archftects • Irteorporated
2001 UNIVERSITY
AVENUE SOUTHEAST
SUITE 100
MINNEAPOLIS,
MINNESOTA 55414
P= ('6�1)2.)813 Ir
I h. �cwft Not Mh p1m,
sp
AeAbef
3/16MG
'b'
MD8 JH. RB
0-6, a. w
ROWShm-
4271
were ro.ns.
GOOD
SAMARITAN
umc
EDINA
MINNESOTA
CONDITIONAL USE 9
PERMIT SUBMITTAL 9
SITE PLAN
s 1 3
EX15TING151TUMINOU5
PARKING LOT
14
14
1 55 TOTAL EXISTING STALLS
SITE PLAN
G R O V E
STREET
NEW CONG
STAIRS AND
IPTALR LING5
o
NEW1301- N�
EXISTING
5VEWALK
lo
496.69 (MEA5)
EX15TNO
TlZA5H AREA
NEW SIDEWALK CONC CURB
HDCP
X15TINGNTUNII
f'ARKINr,LQT
ONCRE;E WALK
F()cp
HDcp
24121
104 TOT
- 5TALLS AL EXISTING
25
0=
0 5'10'15' 30'
cfl
II
I
W*
9
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR CON5TRUCT ]ON
STATION
NINETEEN
Archftects • Irteorporated
2001 UNIVERSITY
AVENUE SOUTHEAST
SUITE 100
MINNEAPOLIS,
MINNESOTA 55414
P= ('6�1)2.)813 Ir
I h. �cwft Not Mh p1m,
sp
AeAbef
3/16MG
'b'
MD8 JH. RB
0-6, a. w
ROWShm-
4271
were ro.ns.
GOOD
SAMARITAN
umc
EDINA
MINNESOTA
CONDITIONAL USE 9
PERMIT SUBMITTAL 9
SITE PLAN
s 1 3
N
u
a W
KII
N
d
n
G
■
J
U
0
i
a
i
N
u
L
a
C
i
4
PP'
Ylnl • .rF 'Pik. 65 ...e
z
PROPOSED
BUILDING s
M=910.55 01
v
A
THEE LEGEND
(5) 6
.. I
10 Bi
'. ".'.7
5 T
PR.
V
• _
•.PF_7. 01 1.
Q
I V IRRIG TION S'
,. �. FR 8.4 `.. •_..
3 BJ'•.
O .
�5�
�;:. -
—
1)AF T
5 G &\
ry
CN: 3b
WALL MOUNTED LIGHT
N1O^at eN1AA dPGVt- NIL rrGUnola M I-L
1 PC
5 GS
<
1`
- ' '' '
$'• •
-,0 32
038
0`24'
CN 30 \
�.••
8 BJ
®
_._.........,,.
j
3 ROCK`�AIN
CE `;STRIP
DECIDUOUS TREE
-- . - '" 0'• 24
.,l
• '
0 .26
\ ` ,
/
_ .. �1` - -
N
DO Dnot- Cottooeeod
PO Ia.
EVERGREEN TREE
0 1$
i
PO 12
_
H Duet- Gln�e
H D-It- XedcpWry
_,. —._.-
HC Drat- Xeres Ch -roue
��— PROPOSED CONTOUR
HI Gnat- XlrAry
Al D-et. Aipw
CN
FINISHED POOR ELEVATION
KC Orbt- KWWCMy Cohn
u Dwbt- U.
LO Orbt- Leant
8
0 1 , 0 q 16 0 24
`30
PROPOSED STORM SETTER
-
0 18
PO l0
0 26�
CN 48
\
:0 18
_.._...: -
• PO 0 46
` 12
•M 1 2
C� 28
`,
\ ,
• 0)24 •
',
:....,
18`',`
Wa
Drbtn WeNUI
M
N Irwin WWOW
• 0 60.;
CN 48
- Y 1 19
K MAINTENANCE STRIP `
BE 12
0.
28
T2
N
u
a W
KII
N
d
n
G
■
J
U
0
i
a
i
N
u
L
a
C
i
4
PP'
Ylnl • .rF 'Pik. 65 ...e
z
PROPOSED
BUILDING s
M=910.55 01
v
A
THEE LEGEND
(5) 6
.. I
10 Bi
'. ".'.7
5 T
PR.
V
• _
•.PF_7. 01 1.
Q
I V IRRIG TION S'
,. �. FR 8.4 `.. •_..
3 BJ'•.
O .
�5�
�;:. -
—
1)AF T
5 G &\
ry
a A'.TIE. r _...
WALL MOUNTED LIGHT
N1O^at eN1AA dPGVt- NIL rrGUnola M I-L
1 PC
5 GS
N
u
a W
KII
N
d
n
G
■
J
U
0
i
a
i
N
u
L
a
C
i
4
PP'
Ylnl • .rF 'Pik. 65 ...e
z
PROPOSED
BUILDING s
M=910.55 01
v
A
-: AHED
_ - mACS w +nom+Mr
0 20 w 60 ..: ( ..
tw
F RELIMINARY — NOT
OR CONSTRUCTION
REPLACE ~
STEM AS
U
1
COAL NOTES
BEFORE DIGGING CALL OWNER ONE CALL (631) 45•_0007_
ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF MINA AND MNDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
RESTORE ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO EXISTING CONOITON OR BETTER
SHOULD LANDSCAPE A PLANT BE UNAVAILABLE .THE TIME OF NSTALLATION, ALL SUBSTITUTIONS ARE Y:IB.ECT m THE APPROVAL OF THE
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND THEE A
My EXISTING VEGETATION m BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN A MANNER THAT IS APPLICABLE WITH
LOCAL CITY AND STATE REQUIREMENTS.
SEE EHONEERS GRACING AND UTILITY PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS OF BERMS FENCE. RETAINING WALLS. AND PPE LOCATIONS
ALL TREES SHALL RECEEVE MULCH SAUCERS AND SXREDOED HARDWOOD MLLOI INDIVIDUALLY AS PER PLANTING DETAIL. ALL
SNUB tl+OLlPS SHALL BEGONE A COITINUOLR BEDLRE A Mw. CIF 21• FROM THE ROOTBALL t!i THE PROPOSED PODNETER
PLANTS Ii THEAT rFOwIHa FINAL SHAPE 6 THE eEDLI/E5 ARE m BE FIELD APRROYED BT THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.
PANTS SIIALL BE LARCH® AS A CONTImOUS MASS ALL PAXTNNG BEDS AD RtXlf YIWTDIAIICE BEDS SHALL BE EDGED WITH
A IEAVr OLltt BLAFR QAMOm [DGIHG Qi APPROVER EQUAL
ROCIK OVER 1A105CAPE IABRIC 511ALL BE APPLIED m ALL "TING BEDS AREAS m A 3• DEPTH. 3• SHIEODED HARDWOOD
MIRCIM 9G1LL BE APPLEp m ANNUAL AND FEREODAL BEDS EDGE NTX BLACK DIAMOND ELOPING OR APPROVED EQUAL BETWEEN
Roo AHD WOOD HuLat
ROCK SHALL MATCH EXISTING ROOK MULCH, PROMDE OWNER NTH ROCK SAMPLES FOR THEIR APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
SPRING EXCAVATION AND PANTING PREFERRED, STATION
ALL AREAS NTXIN THZ PRKPEITY THAT ARE NOT SHIOIB BEDS OR HARD SURFACED E %CEPT AS NOTED S NALL BE SEEDED ALL
AREAS QITSDE ,HIE PROPEITY LINES DIMMED BY GRADING OR UTILITY INSTALLATI ON SHALL BE RETURNED m EXISTING. NINE TE E N
tDIETID„ OR BETTER OR A5 NOTED.
Architects Incorporated
2001 UNIVERSITY
AVENUE SOUTHEAST
SUITE 100
MINNEAPOLIS,
MINNESOTA 55414
PHONE (612) 623.1800
FAX (612) 623.0012
LEGE
THEE LEGEND
ED
a
.. I
10 Bi
'. ".'.7
TELEPHONE BOX
PR.
V
' S AW A 1 _
rHEDGE,.
O
FFE =90593
I V IRRIG TION S'
,. �. FR 8.4 `.. •_..
3 BJ'•.
!:DGEfl�.HEDGE
b Nm /-1 above voWw I.L.I. CIO tbcwq
�;:. -
—
7 AW
_ __
a A'.TIE. r _...
WALL MOUNTED LIGHT
N1O^at eN1AA dPGVt- NIL rrGUnola M I-L
1 PC
FR 12'.3.., _
I FIR 10 pR 10 FR 10. - -FR 10" -
<
/
- ' '' '
$'• •
..
A D-eln Ach E.Wnq�
— — —
w.. _
�.••
8 BJ
®
_._.........,,.
j
3 ROCK`�AIN
CE `;STRIP
DECIDUOUS TREE
BU 0—t- 8'.h
OR D—t.
CN DWbt- cch.
DO Dnot- Cottooeeod
EVERGREEN TREE
OG 0a Oe9■oed
FR Dabt- FXN
i
scals fm
_
H Duet- Gln�e
H D-It- XedcpWry
_,. —._.-
-: AHED
_ - mACS w +nom+Mr
0 20 w 60 ..: ( ..
tw
F RELIMINARY — NOT
OR CONSTRUCTION
REPLACE ~
STEM AS
U
1
COAL NOTES
BEFORE DIGGING CALL OWNER ONE CALL (631) 45•_0007_
ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF MINA AND MNDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
RESTORE ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO EXISTING CONOITON OR BETTER
SHOULD LANDSCAPE A PLANT BE UNAVAILABLE .THE TIME OF NSTALLATION, ALL SUBSTITUTIONS ARE Y:IB.ECT m THE APPROVAL OF THE
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND THEE A
My EXISTING VEGETATION m BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN A MANNER THAT IS APPLICABLE WITH
LOCAL CITY AND STATE REQUIREMENTS.
SEE EHONEERS GRACING AND UTILITY PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS OF BERMS FENCE. RETAINING WALLS. AND PPE LOCATIONS
ALL TREES SHALL RECEEVE MULCH SAUCERS AND SXREDOED HARDWOOD MLLOI INDIVIDUALLY AS PER PLANTING DETAIL. ALL
SNUB tl+OLlPS SHALL BEGONE A COITINUOLR BEDLRE A Mw. CIF 21• FROM THE ROOTBALL t!i THE PROPOSED PODNETER
PLANTS Ii THEAT rFOwIHa FINAL SHAPE 6 THE eEDLI/E5 ARE m BE FIELD APRROYED BT THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.
PANTS SIIALL BE LARCH® AS A CONTImOUS MASS ALL PAXTNNG BEDS AD RtXlf YIWTDIAIICE BEDS SHALL BE EDGED WITH
A IEAVr OLltt BLAFR QAMOm [DGIHG Qi APPROVER EQUAL
ROCIK OVER 1A105CAPE IABRIC 511ALL BE APPLIED m ALL "TING BEDS AREAS m A 3• DEPTH. 3• SHIEODED HARDWOOD
MIRCIM 9G1LL BE APPLEp m ANNUAL AND FEREODAL BEDS EDGE NTX BLACK DIAMOND ELOPING OR APPROVED EQUAL BETWEEN
Roo AHD WOOD HuLat
ROCK SHALL MATCH EXISTING ROOK MULCH, PROMDE OWNER NTH ROCK SAMPLES FOR THEIR APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
SPRING EXCAVATION AND PANTING PREFERRED, STATION
ALL AREAS NTXIN THZ PRKPEITY THAT ARE NOT SHIOIB BEDS OR HARD SURFACED E %CEPT AS NOTED S NALL BE SEEDED ALL
AREAS QITSDE ,HIE PROPEITY LINES DIMMED BY GRADING OR UTILITY INSTALLATI ON SHALL BE RETURNED m EXISTING. NINE TE E N
tDIETID„ OR BETTER OR A5 NOTED.
Architects Incorporated
2001 UNIVERSITY
AVENUE SOUTHEAST
SUITE 100
MINNEAPOLIS,
MINNESOTA 55414
PHONE (612) 623.1800
FAX (612) 623.0012
LEGE
THEE LEGEND
ED
a
AR CONDITI ONING LOOT
EXISTING CODITIONS SURVEY AI/D TREE IDENTIFICATION
'. ".'.7
TELEPHONE BOX
PERFORMED tTY SCHUM Alm MADSON, INC. DATED 12- 10-04.
V
HYDRANT
O
MANHOLE
N-b- I0a-Ir10 cbbl•Vi Um d-It- ari t d ®m1•ts
PoIMEt ROLE
b Nm /-1 above voWw I.L.I. CIO tbcwq
o
IP
nMIWw a any) dWbt- th■ rAmlea a vwu al Thal
IOCOU.. 1 dwlota P d•ad v «).
a
WALL MOUNTED LIGHT
N1O^at eN1AA dPGVt- NIL rrGUnola M I-L
V
LICIT POLE
— iO
PIP( — U101NOM UNERFRWNp UTWr
TELEPHONE
yT . [D Dbs- chlb.
(I n.
PROPERTY TINE
A D-eln Ach E.Wnq�
— — —
- EASEMENT LIE
AV Dabtn Abm V t-
BF DWbtn Bet•Wn Fb 0ILE. &2
®
RETAINING WALL
RI Oabt- 81rM
— - SHOW LINE
BE D•notn B- OdW
BN Dtebt- ButtW
DECIDUOUS TREE
BU 0—t- 8'.h
OR D—t.
CN DWbt- cch.
DO Dnot- Cottooeeod
EVERGREEN TREE
OG 0a Oe9■oed
FR Dabt- FXN
FR D—l" frVll
r1'WYW
TIME l0@
H Duet- Gln�e
H D-It- XedcpWry
- EXISTING COI70UR
HC Drat- Xeres Ch -roue
��— PROPOSED CONTOUR
HI Gnat- XlrAry
Al D-et. Aipw
FFE
FINISHED POOR ELEVATION
KC Orbt- KWWCMy Cohn
u Dwbt- U.
LO Orbt- Leant
�»
PROPOSED STORM SETTER
M Drbt■• MepH,
MP DWMtn Nor Phw
PROPOSED RIPRAP
P D-0- Pr.
PO Orbt- Papb
RO Drbt- RV-i•n '
PROPOSED CONCRETE WALKWAYS
pw
SP DFrot- YPaH e
m Drbl- Tree D■Nduaus
TE Denotn EVryssl
PROPOSED BUtlOO1G EXPANSION
Wa
Drbtn WeNUI
M
N Irwin WWOW
/V� X
�F�L
PROPOSED TREE REMOVAL
DOSED TREE PROTECTION PENCE
PROPOSED EROSION CONTROL BLANKET NTH SEED
'. ".'.7
PROPOSED SODDED AREAS
LANDSCAPE REO1111::11 111179
SITE BOUNDARY - 2883 LF.
2.885 / w . 72 TREES REOUOED FOR 97E
ADOTIDNAL. 30 TREES FIELD L0017ED ARNAAm BW.OING ANp FARKOm LOT.
ADOITIOlALLT THE SITE CONTAINS DENSE WOODED AREAS ON THE EAST Alm
NORTH SIDES OF THE SITE
TOTAL E)"TINO TREES COUNTED - 121+ TREES
EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED FOR IMPROVEMENTS - 26 TREES
TOTAL 95* REMAI24 TREES EXCEEDING THE CITY'S REOLOREMEN75
SHP-US INSTALLAMON
oA r Z=l
PPn■N.
TRt31 INSTALL.Arat
> c�tHy tMl N 00Gm,.
cpa'Ilk I be or G.Dd1
w b> .n• ea a,y
M�d�Lbn■■d pGePOhslv,d ln/lnar
� bw el N4 YtetA I
,n Wapv Andasyl
20893
3 -18-05
MBE ,TWA
04 -117 HTPO
GOOD
SAMARITAN UMC
5730 GROVE ST.
EDINA.
MINNESOTA
LOTS 10 and 11,
WARDEN ACRES
1117
Engineers • Surveyors
Landscape Architects
Ibex Thwp Perm OF be
1Fr.e- t+e aK.
LANDSCAPE PLAN
L1
I'
,I _
:I I
J
I
I
I
STATION
NINETEEN
Arch tecti • Irworporoted
2001 UNIVERSITY
. I
AVENUE SOUTH EAST
SURE too
MINNEAPOUS,
MINNESOTA SU14
UNEXC.'.Y.hIED PHONE 1812 823.1800
FAX Ie121 .0012
Ih "a ff em On phq
apse em, a rwal rra
prqurea M ms a W s mr a:al
ayr NAEfw Ivnaa /y
ibemrea ArelliYCl urbaY IN kra
d u. sar oc
_ MINNESOTA
sl
I
9pwr•
PIGIMD 91WA6FE
EXSr, UIall rLmo
I AdOYM ro.w.
NEXC': /'.IED MDB JH. 110
harly Obel+u4
\ I ro•ufM{{�
b \ \ I
0 � � ^�okwn cup � '.❑
1
I
I
I
\ J
E %5 r. UIILIIi IMNEI. I �
UNEXCP:J ?.rED
42%1
UNEXC!.V: JED \\
GOOD
SAMARITAN
�\ UMC
EDNA
MINNESOTA
UNEXC.A- IED
CONDITIONAL USE �!
PERMIT SUBMITTAL
BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR PLAN o21 12
PRELIMINARY
LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN
3/32 ° =ro' � � �
NOT FOR COI5TRUCTION a
b
(DO
I I
L_
�
I
I i
I
I
I
I
STATION
NINETEEN
y
Arddtects • kKaporaLed
2001 UNIVERSITY
6 i
AVENSOUTHEAST
SUITE 100
--
--
MINNEAPOLIS,
MINNESOTA 55414
I
PHONE(612 627.1800
623.0012
A6eeFAAX�y cc(a61Nd2yy)
I�G•dlvtlm. ���
I
I
°4011 uid Gw I m • dk
ReI�Od adim ones ms Iev
d to mrd
I
I
O
1
(D
I
MINNESOTA
I
RCXIIim B10YIXlFE
O
�ou
�
I
�°
Y1B05
oa
MDS J
,
I
[-
4271
o
lill Jill
GOOD
'
SAMARITAN
UMC
y
O
EDINA
--
MINNESOTA
O
i
i
GENERAL LONE
S��TCLEAR LL5ARE SHOWNSq.ID. NEK'Wr1LL5ARE
CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT SUBMITTAL
LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN
LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN
-L7 • . .
0 4' 6. 12
"
PRELIMINARY
A2 a
A2 3/32 =r-01
NOT FOR CON65TRUCTION
11
i
UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 7LJ7 W
3/32" = 0 4' 6' 12' NORTH
A3 1'-O"
l
STATION
NINETEEN
Ard*wb • IRcoryoraW
2001 UNIVERSITY
AVENUE SOUTHEAST
SURE 100
MINNEAPOLIS,
MINNESOTA 55414
PHONE (612 1621.1600
nn�eFAXy (612) .0012
eps4ra:r OW p .
q».1 m
n.wet W ne a „da. mr e.m
Ile�e�uvm eb Ovt 1 am . eay
pubiee Maebct urds m. ux
a odro ■.r.
MINNESOTA
sps�u.
A� 1iiONMFE
laymen. xiae�
Lt6N5
an
Mob JH, RS
-AV
ReNy"
4271
GOOD
SAMARITAN
UMC
EDINA
MINNESOTA
I EX15TINGWAL CONDITIONAL USE
1. ENN CLGK'ALLS PRE SHOV.N SCUD. NEV11.'.\LLS ARE sHa.MCLEPR PERMIT SUBMITTAL
UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN
PRELIMINARY e
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
I
pt
E
r
A)
-T,
WEST ELEVATION
.VI&06
m.
IH DS
Rewoo,m..
*F'11,-71
T ELEVATION 7..I-7 - o 2- .'
(2 )NORTH ELEVATION
L4 ) V8" f-a
FRELIMINAKYJ
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT SUBMISSIOP
WILDING ELEVATIONS
CI
A4
STATION
N I N E T E E N
�zl
a
a
o
Ardiftects; Incorporated
2001 UNIVERSITY
AVENUE SOUTHEAST
SUITE 100
MINNEAPOLIS.
MNNESOTA 55414
PHONE
FAX (4621)20 DO
001182
I h..ft..Ulv Mal ft. Ph..
pd ;r . —
=
�2
SOUTH ELEVATION
V.W . M da.,
R=.=-i-A.EW But W, � I — . th d* � , 1
d
0 1 4
.VI&06
m.
IH DS
Rewoo,m..
*F'11,-71
T ELEVATION 7..I-7 - o 2- .'
(2 )NORTH ELEVATION
L4 ) V8" f-a
FRELIMINAKYJ
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT SUBMISSIOP
WILDING ELEVATIONS
CI
A4
Jackie Hoogenakker
Oo
From:
Lawless, Kevin J [kevin.lawless @xcelenergy.com]
Sent:
Tuesday, April 19, 2005 3:27 PM
To:
Jackie Hoogenakker
Cc:
April Egan (E -mail)
Subject:
Good Samaritan Church Expansion
My family and I live across the street from Good Samaritan Church. My wife and I
have resided at 5809 Grove St. for 21 years. We have two children walk to Countryside
school in 1st and 3rd grade. We have watched the church grow over the years. In general,
Good Samaritan Church has been a good neighbor over the years. We and some of our
neighbors have some concerns about this particular project though, especially its likely
impact on the traffic and aesthetics of our relatively quiet neighborhood.
In a broader context, this is a neighborhood that has dealt with a number of traffic
issues over the years that have resulted in:
* The rejection of making Wycliffe Road into a through street to Vernon Ave.
* The addition of some sidewalks to Countryside School.
* The addition of stop signs at the Grove St. and Stuart Av. intersection directly in
front of the church.
*
Rerouting of bus traffic to Countryside School and improvements to'the pick -up and
drop -off zones by the school.
Now, this proposal takes the neighborhood in a different direction that will
increase traffic on many more days and evenings, largely for non- church purposes. We are
against expansion at Good Samaritan for non - church purposes. We request that it be placed
in the historical context of the neighborhood, and how as a neighborhood we have worked to
minimize the impacts of the increased traffic due to changes in the way we live in this
metropolitan area. -I would like to emphasize that this is a residential neighborhood that
co- exists with a school and a church in close proximity.
* This project is an expansion of the church to support a range of activities that are
church - related and commercial activities. When we reviewed the proposed uses for this
expansion, most of the activities seem to be related to commercial renting of the
facilities for basketball leagues, day -care, and banquets for up to 300 people. Many of
these activities are scheduled simultaneously with the periods of time that children are
traveling to school. Given that the church is very close to Countryside school (about 5
houses away), this has the potential to significantly increase traffic during school hours
and when the neighborhood's children are walking to /from school. This will present an
increased safety hazard for our children.
* Aesthetically, the expansion of the church will create a large campus like structure
within our neighborhood. Numerous large trees currently grow in the planned footprint of
the expansion. Aesthetically this will change the neighborhood, with potentially changes
in housing values.
* Finally, the planned activities for this expansion are largely, commercial like
activities. Banquets, basketball leagues, community events, etc can all be supported by
existing commercial, city, and existing school facilities. This seems like a project
looking for customers, not parishioners. The area is not zoned commercial and I assume
the church is not a property -tax paying facility. We can also assume that due to the
nature of the expanded traffic and safety issues that the neighbors will eventually be hit
with expanded property taxes to support a tax -free, commercial -like facility. We
recognize that the church has a need to find alternated purposes for its facilities when
they aren't being used by the church, but this expansion seems to overly focus on these
alternate purposes.
In the end, we believe that this project will result in more traffic, additional
expansions of traffic control measures, and investments in sidewalks. We request that
this facility either not be approved at tonight's or that the question be tabled, until a
traffic study be completed and shared with the neighborhood. In addition, the church may
want to consider a smaller expansion.
Sincerely,
1
Kevin J. Lawless and April H. Egan
5809 Grove Street
Kevin J. Lawless
Executive Sponsor, CRS Program
Xcel Energy
414 Nicollet Mall (RS6)
Minneapolis, MN 55401
phone: 612 - 330 -7936
e -mail: kevin.lawless @xcelenergy.com
5621 Wycliffe Road
Edina, MN 55436
April 16, 2005
Mr. James Hovland, Mayor
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Mr. Hovland:
I've already sent a letter regarding the Good Samaritan building proposal and I maintain
the requests I made from that letter, but I have since learned more about the proposed
uses for the addition that have confirmed my fears about the impacts the project could
have on our neighborhood and this leads me to be strongly opposed to the undertaking as
envisioned.
Churches serve a valuable role in the community. Growth is an outcome of a church that
meets the needs of its members and creates enthusiasm for its programs. When growth
does occur, the church as a neighbor should consider the impacts to the neighborhood and
exert real effort to minimize them. When building is involved, the city assists in
examining impacts to the neighborhood and helping to keep the impacts to a minimum
including property values, aesthetics, safety, traffic, parking and the environment.
I remain concerned about the process to balance this proposal regarding Good Samaritan
with the input of the neighborhood. I understand that this meeting is an attempt to do just
that, but what I'm concerned about is the process of creating understanding in the
neighborhood so we can be prepared for this meeting. The truth is, in talking to people in
the neighborhood nearly everyone I've talked to have had no understanding of what is
going on. With this as the case, something seems to have gone amiss. When you
recognize that this is a school zone, with kids coming and going to and from school at all
times of day from all areas of this neighborhood, I also don't understand why a wider
area of people weren't included in the notification. The notice appeared to include only
those within 500 feet of the property. I believe the whole area is impacted if the proposal
is about increased usage during all times of the day, all days of the week through the
school year.
I want to keep the impacts to the neighborhood to a minimum and as I've now had a
chance to look at city residential R1 code, it appears that the spirit of the law provides for
this. Subdivision 4.D.2 says "No conditional permit shall be issued unless the council
finds that the operation will be complementary to other uses ... and will not adversely
impact the neighborhood."
Regarding whether the uses are complementary to those of a church, when I read the
letter from the church to Craig Larson of the planning department about their intended
uses, my concerns about the project heightened dramatically. In describing the intended
uses for the new additions, the great majority of listed of user groups appear to be non-
church related. The letter goes on to the point that I begin to wonder whether this could
be from a commercial real estate developer outlining prospective tenants for a community
center rather than a letter from a church. Non - church groups or programs listed include:
Early bird walkers, aerobics, pre - school and ECFE, Edina Basketball association,
volleyball leagues, golf practice. Then, with the kitchen, possible banquets for non-
church groups, and further, a caterer interested in taking meals off campus presumably
for profit. Growing churches should be an outcome of the church meeting the spiritual
and social needs of its members with church programs. In this case, it appears that the
church may be attempting to grow through the addition of a building and funding it by
leasing to civic or other organizations.
Regarding adverse impacts, all of my concerns about the impact to the neighborhood
stated in my prior letter have been confirmed. I'm concerned about the impacts of
increased usage that goes from 7:00 am to 10:00 pm at night, Monday through Friday,
and Saturday and Sunday afternoons. Would this increase traffic hazards for kids going
to and from school? Or would a church banquet for 275 people on Wednesday night
have an impact on the many young families walking the neighborhood after dinner on a
spring evening? Bear in mind a banquet with 275 attendees rivals the size of a Sunday
service in peak season and would result in the same traffic and parking congestion as a
Sunday morning. Could a men's basketball game between St. Louis Park and Edina on a
Friday night when a school dance is going on make people in the neighborhood think
differently about.how to care for their kids that evening? Some of the uses such as open
gym on a Saturday afternoon may be. considered outreach, but I can't help but be
concerned about bringing into the neighborhood people not really part of the church and
not part of the neighborhood when my kids are riding their bikes in the street or to the
school park to play. I- have four young daughters and in today's society I need to be
concerned about such things. I would understand better if we were discussing the church
having an in -house basketball league for its members. I also remain concerned about the
impact of the design itself aesthetically and on property values especially with increased
activity in the neighborhood. Also, if the church is successful in attracting new members,
I'm concerned about the possible future sprawl and the impact to the wildlife
environment around Hawkes lake: Where will additional parking go?
I request that the council deny the current proposal and ask the church to consider an
alternative plan and design. I request that the process slow down to take adequate
neighborhood input and assessment of impacts. I request the recognition that this is a
school zone. I request that the city require the intended uses to be church funded
programs and the intended users to be church members. I request that any plan address
impacts to aesthetics, parking, traffic, safety, and the environment now and in the future
such as those I have described in this and my prior letter. Thank -you for your
consideration.
Yo tru ,
Gary A Lee ' '`'�
rage i of i
Jackie Hoogenakker W. 0'
From: Tom Shaughnessy [thaughnessy @metronet.lib.mn.us]
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 8:18 AM
To: Jackie Hoogenakker
Subject: Good Samaritan Church expansion
Dear Mr Hoogenakker: We own the property immediately adjacent to Good Samaritan Church, 5705 Wycliffe
Rd. We have reviewed the plans for the expansion of the church with some concern. But please note that we are
not completely opposed to the church's plans but only ask that they consider some of our issues. First, we
propose that the wing closest to Wycliffe be repositioned so as to be parallel to the existing building rather than
being perpendicular to it. If this is not feasible, we ask that the new wing be set back farther from Wycliffe, with
the west wall of the new wing made flush with the existing west entrance. However our most preferred solution is
to place the new wing on the east side of the building. We prefer this approach because it will have less impact
on Wycliffe (and our property). We worry that users of the new wing (which we understand will house a
basketball court) will be inclined to park on Wycliffe because of its proximity to the facility's entrance. Both parking
lots are at some distance from the new wing. And there are so many children who play in the street... ride bikes,
skate board, etc that cars parked along Wycliffe will create a hazard. Finally we believe that the high roof line of
the new wing will also detract from the very residential nature of our street, particularly if the new wing is not
moved to the east and made flush with the existing west entrance to the church.
We appreciate your consideration of these concerns.
Sincerely,
Tom and Marlene Shaughnessy
5705 Wycliffe Rd
Edina MN 55436
952 922 -5381
Tom Shaughnessy
Executive Director
Metronet
1619 Dayton Ave.
St. Paul, MN 55104
651.646 -0475
Fax 651.649 -3169
4/18/2005
Jackie Hoogenakker
From: kenneth.frank @usbank.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 8:29 AM
To: Jackie Hoogenakker
Subject: Good Sam Expansion
Hello,
We live on Grove Street about two houses away from Good Samaritan Church.
The Church has been a good neighbor, however, we object to the proposed
expansion.
This addition to the church will allow the church to have more activities
(other than actual church services). For us, this will mean INCREASED
traffic on Grove Street at more hours of the day on more days of the week.
This increased traffic will be harmful to safe access to our driveway and
will increase the density of traffic on Grove Street. Both of these things
will affect the safety of driving and walking on our street and will
increase noise levels.
Please do not allow,this expansion to be approved. Thank you.
Kenneth Frank and Linda Klaver _
5701 Grove Street West, Edina 55436
Riverbank location - Gold Area
Phone 651 205 -1357
Electronic Privacy Notice. This e-mail, and any attachments, contains information that is,
or may be, covered by electronic communications privacy laws, and is also confidential and
proprietary in nature. If you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that you
are legally prohibited from retaining, using, copying, distributing, or otherwise
disclosing this information in any manner. Instead, please reply to the sender that you
have received this communication in error, and then immediately delete it. Thank you in
advance for your cooperation.
I ` Y
1
oe
1v e8
R
AGENDA NO. IV.E.
PUBLIC HEARING -
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL
THE BLAKE SCHOOL AND CITY OF HOPKINS
WEST OF BLAKE ROAD/
NORTH OF BELMO LANE
CONTINUED TO 5/ OS
No packet data �
F-] Oral presentation
F� Information coming
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, City Engineer
VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
DATE: April 19, 2005
AGENDA ITEM V.A.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Robotic Total Station Unit for Surveying Purposes
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. Leica Geosystems 1. $ 32,256.44
2. GeoShack 2. $ 34,315.37
3. Kara Company 3. $ 35,089.87
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Leica Geosystems
$ 32,256.44
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This purchase is for a Robotic Total Station Unit to replace an existing Total- Station Unit that is used
within the Engineering Department for field surveys, staking construction projects, and maintaining data
on our infrastructure. The Robotic Total Station Unit only requires one person to operate compared to
two people for the existing unit. This unit can also be combined with a Global Positioning System
(GPS) in the future that will further the efficiency of the survey requirements. This purchase.is funded
through the Engineering equipment replacement budget. Staff recommends awarding this purchase to
Leica Geosytems.
Public Works - Engineering
Signature Department
The Recommended Bid is ,.
within budget not within budget JohK allin Finance Director
Gordon Hughes, ty anager
i
o e
Ham`' 0 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
ess
TO: Mayor Hovland and Members of the City Council
FROM: John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation
VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
DATE: April 19, 2005
AGENDA ITEM: V.B.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Deck Replacement and Expansion — Edina Aquatic.Center
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. RJ Marco 1. $34,950.00
2. Lattemer Enterprises, Inc. 2. $35,750.00
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
RJ Marco $34,950.00 (includes sales tax)
Account #: 5300.1715
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This is for purchase and installation of 2,220 square feet (980 s.f. of replacement and 1,240 s.f. or
expansion) of concrete decking for the Edina Aquatic Center. Specifications call for replacement
of approximately 980 square feet of worn 5" concrete deck area where the old concessions stand
was previously located. The 980 square feet of old and worn deck area is over 46 years old and
needs replacement and has become a safety issue. Specifications also call for expansion of the
existing deck in accordance with the master plan, which is approximately 1,240 additional square
feet of 5" concrete deck area. As shown on the attached site plan, the expansion is located on the
southwest side of the Aquatic Center, which is currently a grass area. No trees or shrubs are
affected by this expansion. With the new step -in entry addition on the northeast end of the main
pool, there is a loss of 900 square feet of concrete deck area. The existing fencing and gate will
be reinstalled in the new expanded area and will require some new additional fencing.
This project is budgeted at $35,000.00 and funded by the Enterprise Funds under the Capital
Improvement Plan.
Edina Park and Recreation
John Kods, Director Department
This Recommended bid is
within budget
not within budget ohA W Fin e Director
Hughes,'
E)WANSION JOINT. -�
(EJ) TYPKN_
SEE DETAIL 12.
NEW CONCRETE
DECK (SHADED AREA)
CONNECT DECK J
DRAINSTO
EXISTING LINE
EXISTING FENCE TO REMAIN -
DO NOT DISTURB.
= (D O O O O
\ pppV10� �'TL- R1�1c'TYc
� PRIC�'Ta (tE�c� AEe�
R�MIOVrc rcX16TlN6 � XT' OUD cowcei5c04g o
t- �t7rN'D U6C.1C
ea6E AF
OtGK- f W To 14( O
Lou+TtE: rN FIELD
4zE.laCS'f�
6 welop
t'Ro{� -C� NEW Fi=NCE lot�►ToN
O C♦�t. . ggyCIN6 uwopo— Fooloc.#,)
FOOL OECR. CONCRETE WrM
TW6X4W7AXTWAWWF. LIGHT
BRDOM FWK NONSJP. TOOLED
JOINTS.
CONTROL
DRANW
EXISTING
BATH HOUSE
t;gty- Fwmo-pl o wo 11 • 1 • 04
e
.CONTROL Jowl. (cn TOOL
FoMDECIC CONCRETE CTM
WO B X GINIA x WIANWF. t6
BROOM FM=t MOMSJP. TOOL
JOR
' m §
GRANULAR ORAWAOECOU
10 FELT Bao BREAI
OR
(SEESPOR
r
0 e
.�O
••tiro,„• REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
laos
TO: Mayor Hovland and Members of the City Council
FROM: John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation
VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
DATE: April 19, 2005
AGENDA ITEM: V.C.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Theme Wall Addition - Edina Aquatic Center
Compan y Amount of Quote or Bid
1. Themescapes, Inc. 1. $31,600.00
2. Rock & Waterscape Systems, Inc. 2. $98,750.00
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Account #: 5300.1720
Themescapes, Inc. $31,600.00 (includes sales tax)
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This is for purchase and installation of custom theme rock formations in front of the pump house,
mechanical, filtration rooms for the Edina Aquatic Center. This is the highly visible and currently
unsightly area on the northwest side of the Edina Aquatic Center directly under the themed ship
that is the platform for the cable ride attraction. This additional theme rock addition purpose is to
serve as both a marketing attraction that is highly visible from the Crosstown Highway 62, as well
as create a more aesthetically pleasing appearance under the themed ship. This theme rock
addition is part of the master plan for the Edina Aquatic Center.
Themescapes Incorporated is the local Minnesota company that previously installed the themed
ship and dry playground area at the Edina Aquatic Center. There are few theme creation
companies in the nation. Rock & Waterscape Systems Incorporated are located in California,
which is probably the main reason for their extremely high quote. Themescapes Incorporated
also provided all the theme amenities in Camp Snoopy at Mall of America, as well as, all of the
Rainforest Cafe restaurants across the country.
This project is budgeted at $35,000.00 and funded by the Enterprise Funds under the Capital
John Kei6dos, Director
This Recommended bid is
within budget
Edina Park and Recreation
Department
not within budget, _1 n_, Mriance Director
Hugheg, City Manager
G
I
Ow Le A�
o �aee
REPORURECOMMENDATION
To:
Mayor & City Council
Agenda Item
VI.A.
From:
Mike Siitari, Police Chief
Consent
❑
❑
Information Only
❑
Date:
April 14, 2005
Mgr. Recommends
To HRA
❑
To Council
®
Subject:
501h & France Liquor License &
Motion
Permit to Use City Property
El
Resolution
°
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the 50`h & France Business Association's applications for a Temporary On -Sale
Intoxicating Liquor License and a Special Permit for Use of City Property in Conjunction with a
Temporary Liquor License. .
INFO /BACKGROUND:
The 50`h & France Business Association has applied for a Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor
License to sell beer and wine at the 50`h & France Art Fair on June 3 -5, 2005. The Association has
also applied for a Special Permit to use the Edina 5 -0 Municipal Parking Lot as the location for the
licensed premises. A copy of the signage plan and parking lot set -up is attached. 11 1
Background checks on the Business Association show they are eligible for the liquor license. The
plan submitted for the parking lot is similar to last year's plan but the size of the fenced area has
been reduced. Private security will control access to the beer garden and two uniformed Edina
Police Officers will patrol the parking lot and.fenced area on foot. The event was well run last year
with no problems related to the Liquor License.or the use ofthe municipal parking lot.
0
49 1/2 Street \ �,
2005 Edina Art Fair
Edina 5 -0 Parking Lot .
Sound]
rBq �'entid Stage trailer Qf,�Q
WO
Emergency
Exit O' Wide) I
Re
co" eessioos
-
- Van
�j
® ® ® WI
Shooster's
Griu Refridge.
Info Tent ® ® ® a Truck
Jerry's
Truck
Mario'5 Lemonade j
Key Westrum's „ „
j.Ilpe No A! oho/ Beyond this Point (ono enter site side
Y opposite
®Tables/ChairsI Restrooms
50th Street Gate Entrance w /Security officer
1D0 FEET checking I.D.
0
Roaming EPD
Banner on Tent . Barricade
C
10'x20' tent
Approx. 4'x3'
Wine Name
and Logo
Approx. 4'x3'
Beer Name
and Logo
Pricing/ Pricing/
Product Product
Sign Sign
22" x 28" ® 12211 x 28"
Must be 21 +
to purchase, I
please have
ID ready
Art Fair Beer Garden
Signage Plan
REPORURECOMMENDATION
TO: Mayor & City Council
From: Wayne Houle, PE
City Engineer
Date: April 19, 2005
Subject: Authorize agreement for
Vernon Avenue Watermain
Relocation with City of St.
Louis Park.
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
Consent
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends
Action
y
VI. B.
❑ To H RA
® To Council
❑ Motion
® Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Adopt resolution 2005 -28, authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to sign attached Letter
of Agreement.
Info /Background:
The Minnesota Department' of Transportation is scheduled to construct sound walls along
both sides of TH100 from Minnehaha Creek to West 44th Street on the east side and to the
north City limits on the west side. The current watermain along Vernon Avenue will be
required to be relocated as part of the sound wall project from West 44th Street to the north
City limits. Additional watermain to the north along Vernon Avenue is also required to be
relocated. The City of St. Louis Park has agreed to reconstruct the portion of watermain in
Edina as part of their watermain relocation project. Estimated cost to the City of Edina is
$37,600. Council approved the sound wall project north of West 44th Street on September
2, 2003, through the MNDOT Municipal Consent process. Staff and legal council has
reviewed the agreement and recommends approval of this agreement.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-28
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING City of Edina
EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
FOR VERNON AVENUE WATERMAIN RELOCATION
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park has submitted an Agreement to the City of Edina
requesting execution by the Mayor and City Manager allowing the Cities to jointly undertake
the relocation of the watermain on Vernon Avenue; and
WHEREAS, this agreement shall expire upon full payment by the City of Edina for all work
constructed.
NOW THEREFORE, Be It Resolved, that the City Council of the City of Edina has authorized
the Mayor and City Manager to sign the agreement and return a copy to the City of St. Louis
Park.
Attest
ADOPTED: the 19th day of April, 2005.
City Manager Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the
attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina
City Council at its regular meeting of April 19, 2005, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular
meeting.
WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this day of .2005.
City Clerk
City Hall 952 - 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390
EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379
April 11, 2005
Mr. Wayne Houle, P.E.
Director of Public Works /City Engineer
City of Edina
4801 W. 50t}' Street
Edina, MN 55435
RE: Letter of Agreement for Vernon Avenue Water main Relocation
City Project No. 2005 -0100
Dear Wayne:
This letter serves as an agreement between the cities of Edina and St. Louis Park related to the
relocation of a water main on Vernon Avenue. The water main is located in and, serves property
owners, in both cities. Due to the installation of a noise wall by the Minnesota Department of
Transportation (Mn/DOT), it is necessary that the cities relocate the subject water main. Plans
for this work, prepared by the City of St. Louis Park, have previously been submitted to your
office for review and approval.
In accordance with those plans, this letter attempts to lay out the roles and responsibilities of each
agency in the undertaking of this project. Therefore, it is mutually agreed that:
• it is necessary to relocate the water main to a location clear of the future noise wall
• the City of St. Louis Park has prepared plans for this work which have been reviewed and
approved by the City of Edina
• the City of St. Louis Park will be responsible for procuring a contractor to execute this
work in accordance with the Public Bidding Statutes and will provide the necessary
construction observation and management of the project in accordance with approved
plans and specifications
• the City of Edina will be responsible for communicating with City of Edina residents
regarding the project
• the City of St. Louis Park will be responsible for communicating with City of St. Louis
Park residents regarding the project
• the City of St. Louis Park will be responsible for all payments to the contractor
• the City of Edina will reimburse the City of St. Louis Park for that portion of the
improvements located within the City of Edina based upon final quantities and costs upon
completion of the project and receipt of an invoice from the City of St. Louis Park.
• Restoration of the curb & gutter, driveway aprons, boulevards, etc. will be performed as a
part of the Mn/DOT Noise Wall project
• Maintenance of the roadway and water main will continue as currently performed by the
cities
• This letter of agreement shall expire upon full payment by the City of Edina for all work
constructed
Please review this letter to see if it meets your needs. If you are in agreement with the contents
of this letter, please have the necessary signatures affixed and return both copies to my attention.
The City of St. Louis Park will then sign the document and send you an original copy for your
records.
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
By:
Jeffrey W. Jacobs, Mayor
By:
Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager
Date:
CITY OF EDINA
By:
James Hovland, Mayor
By:
Gordon Hughes, City Manager
Date:
Sincerely, �PEX
M ' a A. Hagen,
City Engineer
c: Mike Rardin, Director of Public Works
O:Tubwks\Const 2005\2005 -0100 - TH 100 WM RelocationTdina Agrmt Letter.DOC
11
a
Info/Background:
We have a vacancy on the Park Board and Bill Crawford has just resigned from the
Heritage Preservation Board effective June 2005. On Tuesday evening I will make
recommendations for these vacancies.
M
REPOKI/KLCUMMCN VA 11U1V
To: City Council
Agenda Item VI. C.
From: James B. Hovland
Consent
Mayor
Information Only
Date: April 19, 2005
Mgr. Recommends F
To HRA
®
To Council '
Subject: Appointments to Park Board
and Heritage Preservation
Action VN
Motion
° Board
Resolution
F1Ordinance
Discussion
Info/Background:
We have a vacancy on the Park Board and Bill Crawford has just resigned from the
Heritage Preservation Board effective June 2005. On Tuesday evening I will make
recommendations for these vacancies.
M
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
4/6/2005 8:40:40
Page - 1
Business Unit
BRIDGES GUARD RAILS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
GENERAL TURF CARE
YORK SELLING
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
ENGINEERING GENERAL
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY
PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS
GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE
GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL
63.24
108790
451768
5842.5515
R55CKREG LOG20000
63.24
CITY OF EDINA
270717
417/2005
102191 ADVANCED GRAPHIC SYSTEMS INC.
Council Check Register
1,013.13
TONER CARTRIDGES
4!7/2005 — 417/2005
INV00060326
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
270713
417/2005
41712005
108757 3D SPECIALTIES
116355 ALIGNEX INC.
1,398.21
PANELS, FITTINGS
108934
418334 1343.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1260.6103
1,398.21
202.35
270714
417/2005
4/7/2005
100613 AAA
100575 ALL SAFE FIRE & SECURITY
4,611.44
LICENSES
108724
032805 1553.6260
LICENSES & PERMITS
5430.6230
4,611.44
58.33
270715
4/7/2005
4/7/2005
101971 ABLE HOSE & RUBBER INC.
114821 ALLEGIANCE TELECOM CO WORLDWID
39.42
SCREW, BALL BEARING, HANDLE
108725
05 -02100 1643.6530
REPAIR PARTS
39.42
270716
417/2005
102971 ACE ICE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
4/6/2005 8:40:40
Page - 1
Business Unit
BRIDGES GUARD RAILS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
GENERAL TURF CARE
YORK SELLING
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
ENGINEERING GENERAL
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY
PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS
GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE
GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL
63.24
108790
451768
5842.5515
63.24
270717
417/2005
102191 ADVANCED GRAPHIC SYSTEMS INC.
1,013.13
TONER CARTRIDGES
108870
INV00060326
1550.6406
1,013.13
270718
41712005
116355 ALIGNEX INC.
202.35
SOFTWARE INSTALLATION
108871
2262
1260.6103
202.35
270719
4/7/2005
100575 ALL SAFE FIRE & SECURITY
58.33
EXTINGUISHER CERTIFICATION
108726
64985
5430.6230
58.33
270720
4/7/2005
114821 ALLEGIANCE TELECOM CO WORLDWID
544.24
PHONE /DATA
108935
15012358
7411.6188
544.24
270721
4/7/2005
102116 ANCHOR PRINTING CO.
783.28
CITY COUNCIL BROCHURES
108727
13882
2210.6575
783.28
270722
41712005
101874 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC.
134.19
RADIO ACCESSORIES
108936
40544
1301.6406
134.19
270723
41712005
102172 APPERrS FOODSERVICE
107.03
108728
359492
5421.6406
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
4/6/2005 8:40:40
Page - 1
Business Unit
BRIDGES GUARD RAILS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
GENERAL TURF CARE
YORK SELLING
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
ENGINEERING GENERAL
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY
PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS
GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE
GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Dale
Amount
Vendor / Explanation P O
REPAIR PARTS
603.98
Council Check Register .
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
711.01
4/7/2005
270724 41712005
118061 ARAMARK UNIFORM
Inv No
37.98
UNIFORM PURCHASE
108728 .
27.19
UNIFORM PURCHASE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
23.99
UNIFORM PURCHASE
1646.6201
63.92
UNIFORM PURCHASE
56657524 -1
121.88
UNIFORM PURCHASE
108874
25.98
.UNIFORM PURCHASE
LAUNDRY
12.99
.UNIFORM PURCHASE
5422.6201
14.99
UNIFORM PURCHASE
56224868P0001
328.92
LAUNDRY
270725 4/7/2005
56631203 -1
100634 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO.
LAUNDRY
85.46
PRESSURE SWITCH, RELAY
1301.6201
380.21
BACKRACKS
56681623 -1
465.67
LAUNDRY
270726 41712005
103708 AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS CO.
301.50
SERVICE CALL
301.50
270727 41712005
112862 AXELSON, MARY
98.80
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
98.80
270728 417/2005
103241 BALDINGER, WENDY
125.00
PERFORMANCE 4/14/05
125.00 -
270729 417/2005
102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC.
506.95
BATTERIES
47.09
BATTERY
554.04
270730 4/7/2005
101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION
500.00
325.00
107.30
20.13
499.50
108939 1061231
109045 1062261
108878 166665
109017 033005
109046 040105
108729 23069
108940 23399
108791 32786600
108792 32793700
108793 32793800
108794 39748000
108795 32786700
1553.6530
CITY OF
EDINA
REPAIR PARTS
5913.6180
Council Check Register .
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
4/7/2005
- 4(712005
# Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description -
108728 .
359492
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
108872
56641603 -1
1646.6201
LAUNDRY
108873
56657524 -1
1646.6201
LAUNDRY
108874
56641610 -1
1646.6201
LAUNDRY
108875
56631206 -1
5422.6201
LAUNDRY
108876
56224868P0001
1301.6201
LAUNDRY
108877
56631203 -1
5913.6201
LAUNDRY
108937
56626476 -1
1301.6201
LAUNDRY
108938
56681623 -1
1301.6201
LAUNDRY
108939 1061231
109045 1062261
108878 166665
109017 033005
109046 040105
108729 23069
108940 23399
108791 32786600
108792 32793700
108793 32793800
108794 39748000
108795 32786700
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
5101.4413
5610.6136
1553.6530
1553.6530
5842.5512
5822.5513
5822.5512
5822.5515
5862.5512
ART WORK SOLD
4/6/2005 8:40:40
Page - 2
Business Unit
GRILL
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
DISTRIBUTION
ART CENTER REVENUES
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
y
CITY OF EDINA
4/6/2005 8:40:40
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 3
417/2005
- 4!7/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
259.45
108796
32794100
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,711.38
270731
417/2005
117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC.
844.30
SNOW /LAWN CARE
109047
9123
7411.6136
SNOW & LAWN CARE
PSTF OCCUPANCY
844.30
270732
417/2005
100661 BENN, BRADLEY
169.87
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
109018
033005
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
169.87
270733
4/7/2005
117697 BENSON, NANCY
35.75
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
109019
033005
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
35.75
270734
41712005
115067 BENSON, RON PAUL
52.00
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
109020
033005
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
52.00
270735
4/712005
100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS
11.69
OFFICE SUPPLIES
108730
3768400
1260.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ENGINEERING GENERAL
31.69
OFFICE SUPPLIES
108730
3768400
1495.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
INSPECTIONS
93.67
PRINTER CARTRIDGES
108879
3787210
1120.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ADMINISTRATION
1.52
OFFICE SUPPLIES
108880
3785080
1260.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ENGINEERING GENERAL
8.73
OFFICE SUPPLIES
108880
3785080
1160.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FINANCE
46.60
OFFICE SUPPLIES
108880
3785080
1120.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ADMINISTRATION
62.33
OFFICE SUPPLIES
108880
3785080
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
345.32
OFFICE SUPPLIES
108881
3767090
5862.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
VERNON SELLING
50.45
LASER NAME BADGES
108941
3787960
1551.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CITY HALL GENERAL
187.17
OFFICE SUPPLIES
108995
3772530
1400.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
18.75
OFFICE SUPPLIES
109048
3783530
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
857.92
270736
417/2005
108515 BLAUER, LEIGH
35.75
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
109021
033005
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
35.75
270737
4/7/2005
100711 BLOOD, DAVID
100.00
POLICE SERVICE
108863
040705
1419.6102
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
RESERVE PROGRAM
100.00
270738
4/7/2005
101010 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY
i
CITY OF EDINA
416/2005 8:40:40
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 4.
4/7/2005
- 4/7/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Descriptlon
Business Unit
172.80
DIMMER
108942
94299630'
1551.6530
REPAIR PARTS
CITY HALL GENERAL
172.80
270739
41712005
100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS
210.49
ANTI -LOCK
108943
731904
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
197.09
WINDSHIELD
108944
- 730065
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
407.58
270740
417/2005
100667 BROCK WHITE COMPANY
2,500.35
SEALER
109049
11322396 -00
1301.6519
ROAD OIL
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
2,316.38-
CREDIT
109120
11303835 -00
1301.6519
ROAD OIL
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
183.97
270741
41712005
100776 BUTLER, GEORGE
100.00
POLICE SERVICE
108861
040705
1419.6102
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
RESERVE PROGRAM
100.00
270742
417/2005
105315 CALTON, BOB
26.00
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
109022
033005
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
26.00
270743
41712005
102046 CAMPE, HARRIET
72.15
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
109023
033005
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
72.15
270744
41712005
100681 CATCO
273.07
HOSE, FITTINGS
108945
3 -71636
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
29.86
HOSE, CONNECTOR
108946
3 -71225
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
266.25
TIE RODS
108947
3 -71487
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
45.90
FITTINGS
108948
3 -71459
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
13.42
GLADHANDS
108949
3 -71122
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
52.82-
CREDIT
108950
3 -70948
1553:6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
575.68
270745
4/7/2005
102372 COW GOVERNMENT INC.
342.92
TONER CARTRIDGE
108882
RL17247
1260.6548
BLUE PRINTING
ENGINEERING GENERAL
250.27
DATA TRAVELERS
108996
RL35875
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
593.19
270746
4/7/2005
105038 CENTRAL MN TREE SERVICE LLC
585.75
ASSESSMENT REMOVAL
108731
PO 5485
4088.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
TREE REMOVAL
2,130.00
ASSESSMENT REMOVAL
108732
PO 5849
4088.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
TREE REMOVAL
i
CITY OF EDINA
4/6/2005 8:40:40
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 5
417/2005 -417/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
2,715.75
270747
417/2005
100683 CHEMSEARCH
713.07
RUST REMOVER GEL
108951
106179
1553.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
140.30
LUBRICANTS
108952
106180
1553.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
853.37
270748
41712005
100256 CINGULAR WIRELESS
23.07
108883
031705
5420.6188
TELEPHONE
CLUB HOUSE
23.07
270749
41712005
102123 CIT GROUP /COMMERCIAL SERVICES,
29.98
MERCHANDISE
108884
305506
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
29.98
270750
417/2005
101223 CITIES FORD
29.29
VALVE ASSEMBLY
108953
116705WFOW
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
40.85
SWITCH
108954
116703WFOW
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
8.34
RELAY
108955
117003WFOW
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
32.42
HANDLE ASSEMBLY -
108956
117000WFOW
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
79.88-
CREDIT
108957
CM116467WFOW
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
31.02
270751
41712005
118064 CITY OF BROOKLYN PARK
220.00
TRAINING REGISTRATION
108997
033105
1400.6104
CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
220.00
270752
4/712005
101345 COLOURS
9,295.59
ABOUT TOWN DESIGN
109121
9284 -1,2
2210.6123
MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE
COMMUNICATIONS
9,295.59
270753
41712005
101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS
10.92
DUCT TAPE
108733
02534479
1301.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
10.92
270754
41712005
104386 COTSWOLD INC.
240.34
MERCHANDISE
108734
7016
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
240.34
270755
41712005
116755 CSI ERGONOMICS
1,018.62
CHAIRS
108998
INV015371
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
1,018.62
CITY OF EDINA
4/6/2005 8:40:40
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check
Register
Page - 6
4/7/2005
- 417/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
270756
41712005
100701 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO.
934.53
CUSHMAN HAULSTER REPAIRS
108885
130220
5630.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
CENTENNIAL LAKES
136.88
STARTERS
109050
130239
5431.6530
REPAIR PARTS
RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE
1,071.41
270757
4!712005
104638 D. BRIAN'S DELI & CATERING
111.06
INTERVIEW MEALS
109051
13680
1400.6106
MEETING EXPENSE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
111.06
270758
4/7/2005
103143 DAKOTA MAE DESIGNS
53.95
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
109024
033005
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
53.95
270759
417/2005
103176 DANICIC, JOHN
35.75
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
109025
033005
5101.4413
ARTWORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
35.75
270760
4/712005
102121 DATREK PROFESSIONAL BAGS INC
3,033.66
MERCHANDISE
108886
830231
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
3,033.66
270761
417/2. 005
116927 DAVIS SUN TURF
178.29
MOWER REPAIR PARTS
108958
T100135
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
155.64
SPINDLE, BLADE, SPRING
108959
T100135A
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
-333.93
270762
417/2005
102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING
2,546.25
108797
306794
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
19.80
108798
306793
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
463.95
108799
306792
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
97.80
108800
305989
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
2,569.82
108801
305988
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
38.00
108802
306795
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
5,735.62
270763
41712005
118063, DC MANAGEMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL
11,649.00
LEAD REMOVAL
108960
05 -02 -01
7412.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PSTF RANGE
11,649.00
270764
417/2005
100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY
16.88
BAKERY
109052
186961
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
CITY OF EDINA
416/2005 8:40:40
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 7
417/2005
— 41712005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
16.66
BAKERY
109053
186962
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
33.54
270765
417/2005
108648 DOAN, SIIRI
110.50
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
109026
033005
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
110.50
270766
41712005
101691 DON BETZEN GOLF SUPPLY CO.
408.60
MERCHANDISE
108735
18903
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
408.60
270767
417/2005
117435 DUNCAN, PATRICIA
175.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
109043
031705
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
175.00
270768
417/2005
100739 EAGLE WINE
889.69
108803
211148
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
2,023.82
108804
211145
5662.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,640.29
109084
213181
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,122.52
109085
211149
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
5,676.32
270769
417/2005
100741 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
2,706.10
108805
325451
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
2,706.10
270770
4/712005
100742 ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION DIVISI
117.15
PEST CONTROL
109054
4432749
5620.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
EDINBOROUGH PARK
117.15
270771
4!712005
104331 EILERS, JOYCE
95.88
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
109027
033005
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
95.88
270772
41712005
105339 ENRGI
1,520.00
WEBSITE CONSULTING
108736
2525
2210.6124
WEB DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNICATIONS
2,188.75
WEBSITE CONSULTING
108737
2596
2210.6124
WEB DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNICATIONS
3,708.75
270773
4/7/2005
100018 EXPERT T BILLING
5,448.00
FEB TRANSPORTS
109123
030205
1470.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
5,448.00
CITY OF EDINA
4/6/2005 8:40:40
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check
Register
Page - 8
4/7/2005
- 4/7/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
270774
4/7/2005
100216 FARMER BROTHERS COFFEE
47.20
COFFEE
108887
7841882
5430.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
47.20
270775
4/712005
100297 FAST FOTO & DIGITAL
25.56
PHOTO PROCESSING
108738
T2- 200692
2210.6408
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
COMMUNICATIONS
30.89
PHOTO PROCESSING
108888
T2- 201567
2210.6408
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
COMMUNICATIONS
56.45
270776
4/7/2005
105824 FLYING CLOUD ANIMAL HOSPITAL
400.64
K9 HEALTH CHECK
108999
275709
1438.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
K -9 UNIT
80.09
K9 HEALTH CHECK
109000
275736
1438.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
K -9 UNIT
480.73
270777
4/7/2005
105599 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO.
4,298.42
DENTAL PREMIUMS
108739
032205
1550.6040
HOSPITALIZATION
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
4,298.42
270778
4/7/2005
100775 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION
123.50
VOLLEYBALL T- SHIRTS
108961
69647
4077.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
123.50
270779
41712005
117811 GOLDBERG, CAROLYN
60.45
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
109028
033005
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
60.45
270780
4/712005
100779 GOPHER CASH REGISTER
21.30
REGISTER REPAIR
108744
18954
5410.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
21.30
270781
417/2005
101103 GRAINGER
39.97
MARKING WAND
108740
495- 376085 -9
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
174.59
PUMP KIT
108741
498- 202697 -5
1470.6530
REPAIR PARTS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
117.06
SHELVING
108889
970- 974561 -7
5422.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
273.90
CABINET
108890
495- 945575 -1
5422.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
296.84
CABINET, LAMPS
108891
495- 184316 -0
5421.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GRILL
40.70
SOLDER
108962
495- 334009-0
1322.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
244.86
BINS
109055
498 -038211 -5
5422.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
87.74
WRENCHES, HEX KEY SET
109056
498 - 983607 -9
5620.6556
TOOLS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
1,275.66
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA W01cvU0 0.YU.1.
Council Check Register Page - 9
4/7/2005 - 417/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
270782
417/2005
102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC
242.50
108806
71671
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
242.50
270783
4/712005
100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC.
88.35
CIRCUIT BREAKERS, RAY -O -VAC
108742
907826757
1322.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
88.35
270784
417/2005
100785 GREUPNER, JOE
10,050.00
2ND QTR RETAINER
108743
032805
5410.6132
PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
3,521.10
GOLF LESSONS
109057
033105
5201.4543
GOLF DOME RECEIPTS
GOLF DOME REVENUES
13,571.10
270785
41712005
100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
170.79
108807
208484
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
990.64
108808
211547
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
52.35
108809
211146
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
3,156.65
108810
211147
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
67.25-
108811
660965
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
5,563.90
109086
211549
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
60.40
109087
211548
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
9,927.48
270786
4/712005
100155 GRI7TON, KAY
33.80
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
109029
033005
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
33.80
270787
41712005
100787 GRUBER'S POWER EQUIPMENT
28.07
WHEELS
108963
18689
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
28.07
270788
417/2005
100791 HALLMAN OIL COMPANY
402.41
OIL
108745
148232
1553.6584
LUBRICANTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
417.18
HYDRAULIC OIL
108746
148234
1553.6584
LUBRICANTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
504.95
5W30 OIL
108747
148233
1553.6584
LUBRICANTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1,324.54
270789
41712005
105504 HAMILTON, WAYNE
100.00
PERFORMANCE 4/12105
109058
040105
5610.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
ED ADMINISTRATION
100.00
270790
41712005
102711 HARRIS BILLINGS COMPANY
CITY OF EDINA
41612005 8:40:40
R55CKREG
LOG20000
Council Check
Register
Page - 10
4f7/2005
-- 4/7/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor/ Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
745.50
PLASTIC PANELS, URINALS
108892
1012759
1646.6530
REPAIR PARTS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
745.50
270791
4/712005
102778 HARRIS COMPANIES
470.80
HUMIDITY SENSOR
108748
.014677 _
1551.6530
REPAIR PARTS
CITY HALL GENERAL
470.80
270792
41712005
100797 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT
814.76
CHEMICALS
108893
695539
5915.6586
WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES
WATER TREATMENT
814.76
270793
41712005
102190 HAYNES, PATRICIA
34.78
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
109030
033005
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
34.78
270794
4/7/2005
103585 HENNEPIN COUNTY HOUSING DEPART
-
31,943.65
REHAB LOAN PAYBACKS (2)
108894
R- 02- 3,R -96 -6
2101.4205
FEDERAL AID
CDBG REVENUES
.31,943.65
270795
41712005
100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
570.50
FEB 2005
109001
000890
1195.6225
BOARD & ROOM PRISONER
LEGAL SERVICES
570.50
270796
4!7/2005
106371 HENNEPIN FACULTY ASSOCIATES
2,265.17
MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES
108869
040705
1470.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
2,265.17
270797
41712005
102483 HILTI INC.
254.28
DRILL BITS, MORTAR
108895
1600532756
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
254.28
270798
4/7/2005
105785 HINCKLEY CHEVROLET
17,297.85
2005 CHEVROLET IMPALA
109002
M5097
1400.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
17,297.85
2005 CHEVROLET IMPALA
109003
M5095
1400.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
17,297.85
2005 CHEVROLET IMPALA
109004
M5096
1400.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
17,297.85
2005 CHEVROLET IMPALA
109005
M5094
1400.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
69,191.40
270799
4f7/2005
104375 HOHENSTEINS INC.
376.45
108812
354585
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
376.45
4/6/2005 8:40:40
Page - 11
Business Unit
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
377 06 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 109006 040105 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION
377.06
CITY OF EDINA
R55CKREG LOG20000
270803
41712005
112050 IMAGE TREND INC.
Council Check Register
1,625.00
EMS DATA SUPPORT
108749
4/7/2005 - 417/2005
1470.6160
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
270800
41712005
101040 HOPKINS TOWN & COUNTRY DODGE
41712005
100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP.
296.18
KNUCKLE 108964
114868 1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
16.67
296.18
108750
382440
1646.6530
270801
417/2005
100810 HRAICITY OF EDINA
1,500.00
TO FUND HRA 109059
040405 1000.1303
DUE FROM HRA
105694 INFRATECH
1,500.00
270802
41712005
SEALFOAM
101426 HUGHES, GORDON
0501379
5923.6406
4/6/2005 8:40:40
Page - 11
Business Unit
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
377 06 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 109006 040105 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
COLLECTION SYSTEMS
COMMUNICATIONS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
100.00 POLICE SERVICE 108867 040705 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM
100.00
377.06
270803
41712005
112050 IMAGE TREND INC.
1,625.00
EMS DATA SUPPORT
108749
004100
1470.6160
DATA PROCESSING
1,625.00
270804
41712005
100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP.
16.67
PVC ELBOWS, TEES, CROSSES
108750
382440
1646.6530
REPAIR PARTS
16.67
270805
4/712005
105694 INFRATECH
191.70
SEALFOAM
108896
0501379
5923.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
191.70
270806
4/712005
116191 INSTY- PRINTS
384.97
UTILITY BILL STUFFERS
109122
69265
2210.6575
PRINTING
384.97
270807
41712005
101403 J -CRAFT
99.55
SOLENOID VALVE
108965
36523
1553.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
99.55
270808
417/2005
101861 J.H. LARSON COMPANY
1.04
CORD
108897
4468622 -01
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
77.72
CONDUIT, BODY, COVER
108897
4468622 -01
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
67.83
CORD
108966
4468671 -01
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
135.67
POWER CORD
109060
4464631 -03
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
282.26
270809
41712005
101400 JAMES, WILLIAM F
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
COLLECTION SYSTEMS
COMMUNICATIONS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
100.00 POLICE SERVICE 108867 040705 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM
100.00
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
4/6/2005 8:40:40
Council Check
Register
Page -. 12
417/2005
-417/2065
Check # Date
Amount
Vendor/ Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
270811 41712005
100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.
3,125.71
108813
1874171
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
432.55
108814
1874169
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
2,542.90
108815
1874166
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
188.65
108816
1874172
5862.5512'
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
35.20
108817
1874176
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS'SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
3,228.82
108818
1874175
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
237.40
108819
1874312
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
1,378.97
108820
1874173
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,608.00-
108821
277170
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
379.80-
108822
- 277288
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
56.95-
108823
274016
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
253.05
109088
1876592
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
304.20
109089
1876593
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
383.20
109090
1876596
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
742.60
109091
1876598
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
2.85
109092
1876605
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
1,107.65
109093
1876599
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
1,858.14
109094
1876601
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
5,030.13
109095
1876603
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
1,268.49
109096
. 1876608
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
32.20
109097
1876604
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
3,232.92
109098
1876600
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
6,108.80
109099
1876606
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
29,449.68
.
270812 417/2005
100919 JOHNSON, NAOMI
7.80
PETTY CASH
109061
031905
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
15.96
PETTY CASH
109061
031905
5125.6564
CRAFT SUPPLIES
MEDIA STUDIO
41.32
PETTY CASH
109061
031905
5110.6564
CRAFT SUPPLIES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
46.61
PETTY CASH
109061
031905
5111.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT
75.55
PETTY CASH
109061
031905
5120.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
114.95
PETTY CASH
109061
031905
5111.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT
118.26
PETTY CASH
109061
031905
5110.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
420.45
270813 4/7/2005
118069 JOYCE, CYNTHIA
133.90
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
109031
033005
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
133.90
270814 4/7/2005
100846 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO
CITY OF EDINA
4/6/2005 8:40:40
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check
Register
Page - 13
417/2005
— 4/7/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
859.00
108824
431004
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
859.00
270815
41712005
117222 LAKES LANDSCAPE SERVICES
159.75
SPRINKLER REPAIR
108898
4063
01205.1705.30
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
WOODDALE - 56 TO W RECLAIM
159.75
270816
4 /7/2005
100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
361.99
LOCK NUTS, WASHERS
108967
3037209
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
361.99
270617
4 /712005
100853 LEEF SERVICES
31.42
SHOP TOWELS
108899
359332
5422.6201
LAUNDRY
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
31.42
270818
417/2005
118060 LINRUD, PEGGY
127.61
INVISIBLE FENCE REPAIR
108900
033005
01202.1705.30
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
HALIFAX - GRIMES STREET RECON
127.61
270819
417/2005
116882 LIPPERT, BARBARA
52.00
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
109032
033005
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
52.00
270820
41712005
106301 LOFFLER COMPANIES INC.
56.00
COPIER USAGE
108751
110962
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
56.00
270821
4/7/2005
117023 LOUDER, MICHAEL
108.00
MODEL
109044
031705
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
108.00
270822
41712005
118059 LOW AND INSIDE LLC
2,650.00
OPEN HOUSE DESIGN
108901
L -5193
2210.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
COMMUNICATIONS
2,650.00
270823
417/2005
100864 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC.
150.00
SWEEPER CLINIC
108968
3/17
1281.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
TRAINING
150.00
270824
41712005
100868 MARK VII SALES
2,606.43
108825
778689
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
21.95
108826
778690
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
CITY OF EDINA
4/6/2005 8:40:40
R55CKREG L0620000
Council Check Register
Page - 14
4f7/2005
- 417/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
2,628.38
270825
4(712005
102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC
62.50
TELEPHONE SERVICE
108969
23704
1550.6188
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
62.50
270826
417/2005
100870 MATRX
105.60
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
108752
885953
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
300.74
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
108753
885915
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
406.34
270827
4/7/2005
118067 MCCALL, H.
59.71
OVERPAYMENT_ REFUND
109062
040105
5900.1211.1
ACCTS RECEIVABLE MANUAL
UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
59.71
270828
4f7/2005
100875 MCCAREN DESIGNS INC.
750.83
PLANTS
109063
30528
5620.6620
TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
750.83
270829
4(712005
111825 MCGUIRE MECHANICAL SERVICES IN
566.57
TOILET REPAIR
108754
.2486
1551.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
CITY HALL GENERAL
566.57
270830
417/2005
101483 MENARDS
35.61
VARNISH
108756
10175
1301.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
35.61
270831
417/2005
102281 MENARDS
79.23
MAILBOXES
108970
63108
1318.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
79.23
270832
4(7/2005
100681 MERFELD, BURT
100.00
POLICE SERVICE
108862
040705
1419.6102
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
RESERVE PROGRAM
100.00
270833
417/2005
100882 MERIT SUPPLY
477.65
TAR/ASPHALT CLEANER
108971
66577
1314.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET RENOVATION
477.65
270834
4/7/2005
102508 METZGER, MAURE ANN
27.30
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
109033
033005
'5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
27.30
CITY OF EDINA
4/612005 8:40:40
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 15
4f7/2005
— 4f7/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
270835
417/2005
100889 MGA
85.00
RULES SEMINAR
108755
032805
5410.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
85.00
270836
4/712005
103186 MIDWEST FUELS
554.31
FUEL
108902
25427
5422.6581
GASOLINE
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
554.31
270837
4/712005
108693 MIKULICH, KIM
130.00
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
108903
033005
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
130.00
270838
4/712005
100913 MINNEAPOLIS SUBURBAN SEWER &W
1,360.00
WATER SERVICE REPAIR
108757
32641
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
DISTRIBUTION
680.00
WATER SERVICE REPAIR
108972
32644
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
DISTRIBUTION
1,360.00
WATER SERVICE REPAIR
108973
32646
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
DISTRIBUTION
3,400.00
270839
4/712005
101878 MINNESOTA REAL ESTATE JOURNAL
85.00
SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL
108904
020521 -2005
1190.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
ASSESSING
85.00
270840
41712005
118066 MINNESOTA REVENUE
1,230.00
WO ANNUAL PERMIT FEE
109064
4400034491
5915.6260
LICENSES & PERMITS
WATER TREATMENT
1,230.00
270841
41712005
101996 MINNESOTA TROPHIES & GIFTS
58.79
PLAQUE
109007
103863
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
58.79
270842
4/7/2005
100908 MINNESOTA WANNER
1,396.65
ALUMINUM & FABRICATION
108758
0063283 -IN
4400.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
CITY HALLIPOLICE BUILDING
21.30
ANGLE IRON
108974
0063315 -IN
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1,417.95
270843
41712005
102577 MISTER CAR WASH
818.99
CAR WASHES
109008
032205SM01
1553.6238
CAR WASH
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
818.99
270844
41712005
114343 MULLEN, JANET
28.28
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
109034
033005
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
CITY OF EDINA
4/6/2005 8:40:40
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page- 16
4/712005
- 4!7/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor I Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
28.28
270845
417/2005
100922 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS
1,724.51
SIGNS
109065
TI -0138512
1325:6531
SIGNS & POSTS .
STREET NAME SIGNS
1.724.51
270846
41712005
104672 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
366.63
109009
909583317040
1400.6188
TELEPHONE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
113.48
109124"
737969523010
1495.6188
TELEPHONE
INSPECTIONS
480.11
270847
4/712005
100724 NISSEN, DICK
100.00
POLICE SERVICE
108866
040705
1419.6102
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
RESERVE PROGRAM
100.00
270848
4/7/2005
100930 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO.
436.93
RECAPS, DISPOSAL FEE
108975
NW- 94964'
1553.6583
TIRES & TUBES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
305.81
TIRES, DISPOSAL FEE
108976
NW -94865
1553.6583
TIRES 8 TUBES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
742.74
270849
41712005
116480 NSITE MYSTERY SHOPPING
165.00
MYSTERY SHOPPING
108905
1132
5820.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
50TH STREET GENERAL
165.00
MYSTERY SHOPPING
108905
1132
5840.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
165.00
MYSTERY SHOPPING
108905
1132
5860.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
495.00
270850
417/2005
101592 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN
20.43
109066
032405
1504.6218
EDUCATION PROGRAMS
HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION
34.69
109066
032405
2210.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COMMUNICATIONS
75.04
109066
032405
1643.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL TURF CARE
130.16
270851
417/2005
100936 OLSEN COMPANIES
36.93
CHAIN SAW PARTS
108906
328667
5422.6530
REPAIR PARTS
MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS
36.93
270852
41712005
115669 ON CALL SERVICES
490.00
ACCESS PANEL INSTALLATION
109067
1132
5620.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
490.00
270853
4/7/2005
101718 PARTS PLUS
2,036.27
PARTS
108977
032605
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation
2,036.27
270854 4/7/2005 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS
720.00
270855
CITY OF EDINA
VERNON SELLING
4/612005 8:40:40
PEPSI -COLA COMPANY
Council Check Register
5862.5513
Page - 17
VERNON SELLING
4/7/2005 - 4!7/2005
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
PO # Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
109100
8065194 -IN 5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
109101
8065193 -IN 5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
109102
8065195 -IN 5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
270855
417/2005
VERNON SELLING
100945
PEPSI -COLA COMPANY
VERNON SELLING
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
345.20
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
108759
76554848
50TH ST SELLING
5822.5513
172.90
50TH ST SELLING
5822.5515
108827
79754504
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
743.85
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
108907
74263877
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,261.95
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
270856
4/7/2005
102406
PETSMART #458
76.01
K9 SUPPLIES
109010
T-0845
76.01
270857
41712005
100743
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
1,209.65
108828
2179515
94.40
108829
2179516
918.65
108830
2179514
1,576.40
108831
2179510
5.50-
108832
3315717
395.40
109103
2181311
47.20
109104
2181312
319.50
109105
2181313
398.79
109106
2181315
1,759.00
109107
2181310
825.00
109108
2180995
1,817.60
109109
2181316
9,356.09
270858
4/7/2005
100119
PING
188.82
GOLF BAGS
108908
7261390
188.82
270859
417/2005
101110
POLLY NORMAN PHOTOGRAPHY
350.00
ABOUT
BUSINESS PHOTOS
108760
032405
350.00
270860
417/2005
116396
PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC
5421.5510
5842.5515
5430.5510
1438.6406
COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
GENERAL SUPPLIES K -9 UNIT
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
2210.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS
CITY OF EDINA
4/6/2005 8:40:40
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 18
417/2005
-417/2005
Check # Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
1,400.88
CO2 8 METHANE
108978.
160724
7413.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PSTF FIRE TOWER
1,400.88
270861 417/2005
102728 PRECISION LANDSCAPE AND TREE C
1,224.75
ASSESSMENT TREE REMOVAL
108909
PO 5237
4088.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
TREE REMOVAL
1,224.75
270862 417/2005
118062 PRETTY CASES INC.
125.00
MERCHANDISE
108910
6695
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
125.00 .
270863 41712005
100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY
215.89
108833
211535
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
822.20
108834
201731
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
2,275.45
108835
211533
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
755.60
109110
211537
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
171.14
109111
211828
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
5,171.25
109112
211536
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
9,411.53
270864 41712005
103094 PROTECTION ONE
124.61
ALARM SERVICE
108911
031305
5511.6250
ALARM SERVICE
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
124.61
270865 417/2005
101877 PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY ,
5.22
COBRA
109011
033105
1550.6040
HOSPITALIZATION
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
5.22
270867 4/7/2005
100971 QUALITY WINE
8.44-
108836
532503 -00
5860.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
857.18
108836
532503 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
.35-
108837
532473 -00
5860.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
36.82
108837
532473 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
8.35-
108838
532617 -00
5820.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
50TH STREET GENERAL
421.24
108838
532617 -00
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
7.96-
108839
532562 -00
5820.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
50TH STREET GENERAL
800.62
108839
532562 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
6.77-
108840
531999 -00
5820.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
50TH STREET GENERAL
685.35
108840
531999 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
18.32-
108841
532467 -00
5860.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
_ VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
1,852.48
108841
532467 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
17.60-
108842
532708 -00
5860.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
CITY OF EDINA
4/6/2005 8:40:40
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 19
417/2005
-41712005
Check # Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
887,81
108842
532708 -00
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
47.45-
109113
532714 -00
5840.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
2,391.48
109113
532714 -00
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
12.83-
109114
532499 -00
5840.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
1,300.56
109114
532499 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
19.02-
109115
532477 -00
5840.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
1,934.82
109115
532477 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
.93-
109116
533483 -00
5840.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
93.07
109116
533483 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
11,113.41
270868 4/7/2005
101965 QWEST
86.40
952 929 -9549
108979
9549 -3/05
5841.6188
TELEPHONE
YORK OCCUPANCY
54.58
952 929 -0297
108980
0297 -3/05
4090.6188
TELEPHONE
STREET REVOLVING
96.15
952 927 -8861
108981
8861 -3105
1550.6188
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
237.13
270869 4/712005
118052 REAL PRODUCTIONS
576.70
STATE OF THE CITY FILMING
108761
00012172
2210.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
COMMUNICATIONS
576.70
270870 4!712005
102857 RECREATION SPORTS & PLAY
740.18
BLEACHERS FOR WEBER PK
108762
NB -0315A
1647.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PATHS & HARD SURFACE
740.18
270871 41712005
118068 REICHGELD, ROBERT
100.00
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE
109068
040105
5620.6201
LAUNDRY
EDINBOROUGH PARK
100.00
270872 417/2005
100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO.
17.57
SOFTENER SALT
108763
00161073
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
17.57
270873 417/2005
100981 ROCHESTER MIDLAND
125.00
SANITATIONIDEODORIZER
109069
260727
5430.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
125.00
SANITATION /DEODORIZER
109069
260727
5424.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
RANGE
125.00
SANITATION /DEODORIZER
109069
260727
5210.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
125.00
SANITATION /DEODORIZER
109069
260727
5422.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
630.50
SANITATION/DEODORIZER
109069
260727
5421.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
GRILL
1,130.50
270874 4/7/2005
100987 SA -AG INC
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
417/2005 -417/2005
Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No' Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
575.79 ICE CONTROL SAND 109070 41884 1318.6517 SAND GRAVEL &ROCK
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COST OF GOODS SOLD
4/6/2005 8:40:40
Page - 20
Business Unit
SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
GRILL
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
TOOLS DISTRIBUTION
ART WORK SOLD
ART WORK SOLD
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART WORK SOLD
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ART CENTER REVENUES
ART CENTER REVENUES
DIAL -A -RIDE PROGRAM
ART CENTER REVENUES
STREET REVOLVING
STREET REVOLVING
STREET REVOLVING
STREET REVOLVING .
RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE
RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE
575.79
270875
417/2005
111605 SABERTOOTH GOLF
809.13
RAKES
108912
4328
5422.6406
809.13
270876
4/712005
100305 SARA LEE COFFEE & TEA
509.34
COFFEE
109071
8321217
5421.5510
509.34
270877
4/712005
104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP.
375.00
QUARTERLY MAINTENANCE
108913
8101260408
1550.6230
375.00
270878
4/7/2005
100992 SEARS COMMERCIAL ONE ACCOUNT
124.10
LASER MTS, WRENCH
108764
T756069
5913.6556
124.10
270879
4/7/2005
112875 SECOND FOUNDATION SCHOOL
100.75
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
109035
033005
5101.4413
100.75
270880
4/7/2005
102870 SEIFERT, ELIZABETH
29.25
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
109036
033005
5101.4413
29.25
270881
4/7/2005
101587 SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES
656.00
DIAL -A -RIDE JAN 2005
108765
032405
1514.6103
656.00
270882
4/7/2005
101380 SHAUGHNESY, SANDRA
53.95
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
109037
033005
5101.4413
53.95
270883
417/2005
100998 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO.
305.17
PAINT
108766
7492 -5
4090.6406
33.84
PAINT
108767
7610 -2
-4090.6406
33.84
PAINT
108768
7718 -3
4090.6406
27.20-
CREDIT
108769
7602 -9
4090.6406
43.45
PAINT
109072
5038 -4
5431.6406
43.45
PAINT
109073
5036 -8 _
5431.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COST OF GOODS SOLD
4/6/2005 8:40:40
Page - 20
Business Unit
SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
GRILL
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
TOOLS DISTRIBUTION
ART WORK SOLD
ART WORK SOLD
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART WORK SOLD
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ART CENTER REVENUES
ART CENTER REVENUES
DIAL -A -RIDE PROGRAM
ART CENTER REVENUES
STREET REVOLVING
STREET REVOLVING
STREET REVOLVING
STREET REVOLVING .
RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE
RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE
CITY OF EDINA
4/6/2005 8:40:40
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 21
47/2005
- 4!7/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
43.45-
CREDIT
109074
5037 -6
5431.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE
389.10
270884
4/712005
100301 SIMPLOT PARTNERS
1,846.71
FUNGICIDE
108914
430937SI
5422.6545
CHEMICALS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
1,354.68
FUNGICIDE
109075
431072SI
5422.6545
CHEMICALS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
3,201.39
270885
4/7/2005
101000 SIR SPEEDY
259.64
BUSINESS CARDS
108915
46800
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
259.64
270886
417/2005
101002 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS INC
6,217.55
108843
162668
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
49.90
108844
162667
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
13.85
108845
162663
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
257.75
108846
162662
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
926.25
108847
162664
5622.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
7,465.30
270887
41712005
110977 SOW, ADAMA
345.80
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
109038
033005
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
345.80
270888
4/7/2005
101021 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC
116.49
FUEL, PROPANE
108982
032305
1314.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET RENOVATION
116.49
270889
41712005
116856 SPRINT
1,003.73
CDMA SERVICE
109012
031805
1400.6160
DATA PROCESSING
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
1,003.73
270890
41712005
101004 SPS COMPANIES
124.36
ANODE RODS
108770
S1188074.001
1646.6530
REPAIR PARTS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
239.31
WATER HEATER
108771
S1205055.001
1646.6530
REPAIR PARTS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
363.67
270891
41712005
103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC
40.79
FILTERS
108983
S136529
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
30.01
HOSE
108984
S136533
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
70.80
CITY OF EDINA
4/6/2005 8:40:40
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 22
417/2005
- 41712005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
270892
417/2005
101009 STATE TREASURER
35.00
SEMINAR 5/25105
108985
SPRING
1495.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
INSPECTIONS
35.00
270893
417/2005
101014 STREFF ADVERTISING INC
273.45
ANNUAL MEETING
108916
148073
1100.6106
MEETING EXPENSE
CITY COUNCIL
273.45
270894
417/2005
101015 STREICHERS
621.00
LEATHERMAN FUSE
109013
1245655
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
298.09
SQUAD SPOTLIGHT
109014
1255832
1400.6215
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
298.09-
SPOTLIGHTS
109076
CM203924
1400.6215
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
621.00
270895
4/7/2005
101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET.
82.14
CYLINDERS, KEY
108986
384598CVW
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
82.14
270896
4/7/2005
105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC.
73.61
TIRE
108987
10034978
1553.6583
TIRES & TUBES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
73.61
270897
417/2005
102140 SUN MOUNTAIN SPORTS INC.
1,194.50
MERCHANDISE
108917
548127
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
1,194.50
270898
417/2005
100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS
608.00
WANT AD
108772
763913
1550.6121
ADVERTISING PERSONNEL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
608.00
270899
4/7/2005
110674 SUPERIOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIO
15.00
REPLACE PARTS
109015
9375
1400.6188
TELEPHONE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
15.00
270900
41712005
100794 SWANSON, HAROLD
100.00
POLICE SERVICE
108865
040705
1419.6102
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
RESERVE PROGRAM
100.00
270901
4!7/2005
116868 SWENSON, SUSAN
. 61.10
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
109039
033005
5101.4413
ARTWORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
61.10
CITY OF EDINA
4/6/2005 8:40:40
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check
Register
Page - 23
4/7/2005
- 417/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
270902
4/712005
116837 SWILER, KIM
31.20
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
109040
033005
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
31.20
270903
417/2005
102300 TCALMC
55.00
LMC TRAINING
109077
#3
1281.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
TRAINING
55.00
270904
41712005
101526 THOMPSON, BETTY
48.75
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
109041
033005
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
48.75
270905
4/712005
118072 THOMPSON, PAUL
28.50
WARMINGHOUSE HRS REFUND
109125
040405
1600.4722.08
SHELTER BUILDING RENT
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
28.50
270906
417/2005
101034 THOMSEN & NYBECK
45.50
PROSECUTING - YEAZIZW
109078
9441
1195.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
LEGAL SERVICES
1,875.20
PROSECUTING - PROTESTOR
109079
9443
1195.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
LEGAL SERVICES
13,231.80
PROSECUTING
109080
9568
1195.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
LEGAL SERVICES
15,152.50
270907
41712005
101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
3,172.45
108848
366833
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
71.50
108849
366834
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
2,770.00
108850
366963
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
71.70
108851
366835
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
492.00
109081
16954
5421.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
GRILL
6,577.65
270908
41712005
103366 TIME WARNER CABLE
587.76
CABLE TV ADVERTISING
108919
159134
5822.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
50TH ST SELLING
587.76
CABLE TV ADVERTISING
108919
159134
5842.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
YORK SELLING
587.78
CABLE TV ADVERTISING
108919
159134
5862.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
VERNON SELLING
1,763.30
270909
41712005
114701 TIME WARNER CABLE
50.62
CABLE TV
108918
032405
5511.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
50.62
270910
4/712005
101474 TITLEIST
447.68
MERCHANDISE
108774
1960654
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
CITY OF EDINA
416/2005 8:40:40
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check
Register
Page - 24
4/712005
-- 417/2005
Check # Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
370.40
GLOVES
108920
1962779
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
654.71
CAPS, VISORS
108921
1968248
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
1,228.61
GOLF BAGS
108922
1977412
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
229.44
CAPS
108923
1977903
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
39.78
GOLF BALLS
108924
1974733
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
2,970.62
270911 41712005
102742 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLAN
702.65
WATER LEAK LOCATING
108773
000200501155
5913.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
DISTRIBUTION
702.65
270912 41712005
118003 TOMMY BAHAMA
255.91
MERCHANDISE
108775
8200158
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
255.91
270913 4/7/2005
112965 TOP FLITE GOLF CO., THE
431.55
GOLF BALLS
108776
54406754
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
71.40
GOLF BALLS
108925
54483404
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
94.20
GOLF BALLS
108926
54484826
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
597.15
270914 41712005
101693 TOTAL REGISTER
32.50
GIFT CARDS
108777
18125
5822.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
50TH ST SELLING
97.50
GIFT CARDS
108777
18125
5862.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES .
VERNON SELLING
131.99
GIFT CARDS
108777
18125
5842.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
YORK SELLING
14.20
MONTHLY FTP FOLDER
108927
18129
5820.6160
DATA PROCESSING
50TH STREET GENERAL
14.20
MONTHLY FTP FOLDER
108927
18129
5840.6160
DATA PROCESSING
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
14.20
MONTHLY FTP FOLDER
108927
18129
5860.6160
DATA PROCESSING
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
3.88
CREDIT CARD CLEANER
108928
18134
5822.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
50TH ST SELLING
3.88
CREDIT CARD CLEANER
108928
18134
5842.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
YORK SELLING
3.89
CREDIT CARD CLEANER
108928
18134
5862.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
VERNON SELLING
316.24
270915 41712005
118053 TOXALERT INTERNATIONAL INC.
250.00
CO2 SENSOR
108778
11239
1551.6530
REPAIR PARTS
CITY HALL GENERAL
250.00
270916 417/2005
103153 TREUTING, KRISTEN
28.60
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
109042
033005
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
28.60
270917 41712005
101053 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY
CITY OF EDINA
416/2005 8:40:40
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 25
417/2005
-417 /2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
860.86
ELECTRIC PLUG
108779
937227
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
860.86
270918
417/2005
101226 UPS STORE #2965, THE
10.43
SHIPPING CHARGES
108929
POS3248
2210.6235
POSTAGE
COMMUNICATIONS
12.82
SHIPPING CHARGES
108930
POS3249
2210.6235
POSTAGE
COMMUNICATIONS
23.25
270919
417/2005
103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC.
3,508.70
WATER MAIN REPAIR
109082
9289
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
DISTRIBUTION
3,508.70
270920
417/2005
101058 VAN PAPER CO.
427.33
BAGS
108931
575066
5842.6512
PAPER SUPPLIES
YORK SELLING
427.33
270921
41712005
101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC.
37,500.00
GOLF CARS
108780
32205001
5423.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
GOLF CARS
37,500.00
270922
417/2005
101080 WALSH, WILLIAM
100.00
POLICE SERVICE
108864
040705
1419.6102
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
RESERVE PROGRAM
100.00
270923
417/2005
103266 WELSH COMPANIES LLC
593.65
APRIL MAINTENANCE
108932
033105
5841.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
YORK OCCUPANCY
593.65
270924
417/2005
101033 WINE COMPANY, THE
2,012.80
108852
112474 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
374.40
108853
112476 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
33.35-
108854
111421 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
33.35-
108855
111425 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
2,320.50
270925
4/712005
101312 WINE MERCHANTS
2,000.20
108856
120389
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
2,984.41
108857
120390
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
56.45-
108858
23985
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
902.25
109117
120815
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
83.78
109118
120813
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
2,203.60
109119
120814
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 4/6/2005 8:40:40
Council Check Register Page - 26
4/7/2005 - 4/7/2005
Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
8,117.79
101087 WROBLESKI, HENRY
100.00
POLICE SERVICE
270926 417/2005
102492 WIRTGEN AMERICA
270930 41712005
101726 XCEL ENERGY
3,014.19
COVER PANEL, BLADES
108781
144496
53.88
SCREWS, PLATE
108988
144996
3,068.07
SENIOR CITIZENS
1,319.47
CIVILIAN DEFENSE
270927 4/712005
118065 WOODBURY POLICE ASSOCIATION
4,438.28
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
100.00
CERTIFICATION
109016
033105
100.00
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
LIGHT & POWER
PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER
270928 4/7/2005
101086 WORLD_ CLASS WINES INC
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
ARENA ADMINISTRATION
337.00
ED ADMINISTRATION
108859
162783
449.00
108860
162866
270929 417/2005
101087 WROBLESKI, HENRY
100.00
POLICE SERVICE
100.00
RESERVE PROGRAM
270930 41712005
101726 XCEL ENERGY
53.08
DISTRIBUTION
401.95
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
72.26
ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT
63.20
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
1,354.23
SENIOR CITIZENS
1,319.47
CIVILIAN DEFENSE
52.23
CITY HALL GENERAL
4,438.28
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
7.43
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
160.38
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
24.65
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
108868 040705
108782 21201262
108783 21378191
108784 21357177
108785 21381276
108786 21415135
108787 21548931
108788 21578621
108989 21855615
108990 21718132
108991 21835651
108992 21728152
108993 21794467
109126 22248973
1553.6530
1553.6530
1438.6104
5842.5513
5862.5513
1419.6102
1321.6185
5913.6185
1322.6185
5111.6185
5210.6185
1628.6185
1460.6185
1551.6185
1646.6185
5430.6185
1330.6185
1321.6185
5911.6185
270931 417/2005 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
64.94 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 108789 54064316 5210.6610
166.56 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 108933 54064317 5510.6610
575.60 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 109083 54160628 5610.6610
807.10
REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS K -9 UNIT
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
RESERVE PROGRAM
LIGHT & POWER
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
LIGHT & POWER
DISTRIBUTION
LIGHT & POWER
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
LIGHT & POWER
ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT
LIGHT& POWER
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
LIGHT & POWER
SENIOR CITIZENS
LIGHT & POWER
CIVILIAN DEFENSE
LIGHT & POWER
CITY HALL GENERAL
LIGHT & POWER
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
LIGHT & POWER
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
LIGHT & POWER
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
LIGHT & POWER
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
LIGHT & POWER
PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
ARENA ADMINISTRATION
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
ED ADMINISTRATION
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date Amount
Vendor / Explanation
270932 41712005
101091 ZIEGLER INC
39.62
FILTERS
39.62
444,568.06
Grand Total
Lim
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
417/2005 4172005
PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subiedger Account Description
108994 PC000782602 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS
Payment Instrument Totals
Check Total 444,568.06
Total Payments 444,568.06
41612005 8:40:40
Page - 27
Business Unit
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
R55CKSUM LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Summary .
417/2005 4/7/2005
Company
Amount
01000 GENERAL FUND
160,941.61
02100 CDBG FUND
31,943.65
02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND
17,863.68
04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND
5,988.49
04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND
159.75
05100 ART CENTER FUND
2,752.96
05200 GOLF DOME FUND
5,065.27
05400 GOLF COURSE FUND
66,640.39
05500 ICE ARENA FUND
341.79
05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND
3,280.85
05800 LIQUOR FUND
122,020.56
05900 UTILITY FUND
13,130.64
07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND
14,438.42
Report Totals 444,568.06
4/612005 8:45:56
Page - 1 1
We confirm to the best of our knowledge
and belief, that these claims
comply in all material respects
with the requirements of the City
of Edina purchasing po icies and
procedures �
J
Finance
City Manager
CITY OF EDINA
4/13/2005 12:43:35
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 1
4/8/2005
-41`14/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
270933
4/8/2005
102202 GRAND VIEW LODGE
235.00
S. ENGELMAN
109406
040805
1490.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
PUBLIC HEALTH
345.00
S. WILMOT
109407
418
1490.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
PUBLIC HEALTH
580.00
270934
4/812005
103232 MEHA
50.00
S. WILMOT
109408
040805
1490.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
PUBLIC HEALTH
50.00
S. ENGELMAN
109409
0408
1490.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
PUBLIC HEALTH
50.00
E. MARSTON
109410
APR 8
1490.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
PUBLIC HEALTH
150.00
270935
4/1412005
100608 3M CO HGF0878
127.59
SCOTCHCAL NUMBERS
109249
SS41635
1325.6531
SIGNS & POSTS
STREET NAME SIGNS
486.95
LETTERS & NUMBERS
109250
SS41637
1325.6531
SIGNS & POSTS
STREET NAME SIGNS
614.54
270936
4/14/2005
100613 AAA
13.50
VEHICLE TITLE
109411
040705
1553.6260
LICENSES & PERMITS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
13.50
270937
411412005
102971 ACE ICE COMPANY
89.08
109185
451767
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
51.40
109321
451810
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
22,12
109322
451736
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
162.60
270938
4114/2005
101077 AIRTEC INC.
128.84
ELECTRODES, DRILL BITS
109128
299199
1553.6580
WELDING SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
128.84
270939
4/14/2005
100575 ALL SAFE FIRE & SECURITY
137.15
EXTINGUISHER CERTIFICATION
109129
65105
1470.6215
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
137.15
270940
4/14/2005
117824 ANDREW CORPORATION
11,068.00
MIKOM INSTALLATION SERVICES
109412
7458697
44003.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
800 MHZ RADIO
11,068.00
270941
4114/2005
102566 APPLIED CONCEPTS INC
95.65
STALKER LIDAR REPAIR
109251
110667
1400.6215
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
95.65
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
4/8/2005 - 4/14/2005
Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
270942 4/14/2005 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC.
69.23 POOL HEATER REPAIR 109130 26540 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS
69.23
270943
4/14/2005
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
102.92
WASTE DISPOSAL
109252
040105
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
102.92
50TH ST SELLING
GENERAL SUPPLIES
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
270944
4/14/2005
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
100636 ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT CO. INC.
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
11.48
FUEL FILTER
109413
T199700
11.48
270945
4/14/2005
101954 AUGIE'S INC.
47.22.
FOOD
109414
17621
47.22
270946
4/1412005
101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION
143.43
109186
39774700
145.92
109187
39748100
1,276.33
109188
32855500
80.90
109189
39775000
197.96
109190
39748200
107.30
109191
32866400
48.75
109192
32866500
328.00
109193
32866300
3,79
109194
39774800
500.00
109323
32866800
65.95
109324
32866700
82.92
109325
39775100
2,981.25
270947
4/14/2005
117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC.
469.22
SPRING CLEAN UP
109253
9075
469.22
270948
4/14/2005
100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS
35.09
CUSTOM STAMP
109254
SA1514
38.17
OFFICE SUPPLIES
109255
3786440
195.94
OFFICE SUPPLIES
109415
3800870
269.20
270949
4/1412005
103239 BRIN NORTHWESTERN GLASS CO.
7411.6182
1553.6530
5430.5510
5822.5515
5842.5515
5842.5513
5842.5515
5862.5515
5822.5512
5822.5515
5822.5513
5821.6406
5862.5512
5862.5513
5862.5515
7411.6136
1400.6513
1400.6513
1120.6406
RUBBISH REMOVAL
REPAIR PARTS
COST OF GOODS SOLD
4/13/2005 12:43:35
Page - 2
Business Unit
EDINBOROUGH PARK
PSTF OCCUPANCY
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
GENERAL SUPPLIES
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
SNOW & LAWN CARE
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PSTF OCCUPANCY
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
ADMINISTRATION
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
4/8/2005 - 4/14/2005
Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No
135.00 DOOR REPAIR 109131 643903 5821.6180
1314.6406
1650.6710
5610.6136
Subledger Account Description
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
4/1312005 12:43:35
Page - 3
Business Unit
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
STREET RENOVATION
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION
5410.6513
135.00
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
1554.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
270950 4/14/2005
1260.6710
100669 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC.
ENGINEERING GENERAL
1495.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
404.09
ROCK
109416
033105
7400.1705
404.09
PSTF BALANCE SHEET
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
270951 4/14/2005
5430.6186
100679 CARLSON TRACTOR & EQUIPMENT
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
5821.6186
HEAT
3,816.96
FLAIL MOWER
109417
E00805
5861.6186
3,816.96
VERNON OCCUPANCY
5422.6186
HEAT
270952 4/14/2005
1481.6186
101377 CARLSON, CRAIG
YORK FIRE STATION
5911.6186
HEAT
150.00
PERFORMANCE 4/21/05
109502
040105
5420.6186
150.00
CLUB HOUSE
5630.6186
HEAT
270953 4/14/2005
1470.6186
102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC.
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1552.6186
HEAT
277.56
FUSER KIT
109418
OX26787
5913.6186
277.57
FUSER KIT
109418
OX26787
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
487.78
MONITOR
109419
RK25408
616.00
MONITOR
109419
RK25408
34.66
CORDLESS MOUSE
109424
RH95859
40.07
CD -RW DRIVE
109424
RH95859
656.30
MONITORS
109424
RH95859
2,389.94
270954 4/14/2005
100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO
115.64
109256
033105
185.70
109256
033105
261,72
109256
033105
379.83
109256
033105
491.01
109256
033105
527.53
109256
033105
1,030.05
109256
033105
1,279.36
109256
033105
1,564.90
109256
033105
1,573.11
109256
033105
2,062.39
109256
033105
2,118.59
109256
033105
2,231.87
109256
033105
3,931.64
109256
033105
4,833.69
109256
033105
9,853.99
109256
033105
1314.6406
1650.6710
5610.6136
Subledger Account Description
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
4/1312005 12:43:35
Page - 3
Business Unit
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
STREET RENOVATION
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION
5410.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
1554.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
1260.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
ENGINEERING GENERAL
1495.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
INSPECTIONS
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
7400.1705
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
PSTF BALANCE SHEET
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
5430.6186
HEAT
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
5821.6186
HEAT
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
5841.6186
HEAT
YORK OCCUPANCY
5861.6186
HEAT
VERNON OCCUPANCY
5422.6186
HEAT
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
1481.6186
HEAT
YORK FIRE STATION
5911.6186
HEAT
PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER
5111.6186
HEAT
ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT
5420.6186
HEAT
CLUB HOUSE
5630.6186
HEAT
CENTENNIAL LAKES
1470.6186
HEAT
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1552.6186
HEAT
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
1628.6186
HEAT
SENIOR CITIZENS
5913.6186
HEAT
DISTRIBUTION
1646.6186
HEAT
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
5511.6186
HEAT
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
270956
4/1412005
4/8/2005 - 411412005
100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP.
Check # Date Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
11,465.84
109256
033105. 5210.6186
HEAT
43, 906.86
44764
1470.6406
270955 4/1412005
105851 CHANHASSEN DINNER THEATRES
540.46
100.00
TRIP DEPOSIT -ORDER 49609 109420
49609 1628.6103.07
TRIPS PROF SERVICES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
CRAFT SUPPLIES
COST OF GOODS SOLD
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COST OF GOODS SOLD
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
REPAIR PARTS
4113/2005 12:43:35
Page - 4
Business Unit
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
SENIOR CITIZENS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
ASSESSING
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
ADAPTIVE RECREATION
PSTF OCCUPANCY
DISTRIBUTION
100.00
270956
4/1412005
100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP.
540.46
AXES, IRON SLINGS
109132
44764
1470.6406
540.46
270957
4/14/2005
103258 COLLIERS TURLEY MARTIN TUCKER
49.00
MARKET REPORT
109421
04052005 -4801
1190.6105
49.00
270958
4114/2005
100693 COMMERCIAL FURNITURE
798.75
CHAIRS
109133
00094259
1470.6406
798.75
270959
4/14/2005
101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS
92.54
GLOVES
109422
02542045
1301.6610
92.54
270960
4114/2005
100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO.
46.61
CLAY
109257
INV000011864
5110.6564
737.25
CLAY
109257
INV000011864
5120.5510
58.36
KEMPER TOOLS
109258
INV000011865
5120.5510
90.25
CLAY
109501
INV000011198
5111.6406
418.56
CLAY
109501
INV000011198
5120.5510
1,351.03
270961
4/14/2005
101704 COOK, BARBARA
297.19
PROGRAM STAFF
109552
5 -1169
1629.6103
297.19
270962
4/14/2005
100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER
34.34
WATER
109423
033105
7411.6406
34.34
270963
4114/2005
100712 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT
23.43
LOCATER CABLE
109425
3279504
5913.6530
23.43
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
CRAFT SUPPLIES
COST OF GOODS SOLD
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COST OF GOODS SOLD
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
REPAIR PARTS
4113/2005 12:43:35
Page - 4
Business Unit
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
SENIOR CITIZENS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
ASSESSING
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
ADAPTIVE RECREATION
PSTF OCCUPANCY
DISTRIBUTION
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date Amount
Vendor / Explanation
270964 4114/2005
116927 DAVIS SUN TURF
129.71
MOWER CHUTE ASSEMBLY
99.62
PUSHARM ASSEMBLY
229.33
109259 T100135B 1553.6530
270965 4/1412005
102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING
2,604.20
306790
78.60
5421.5510
400.00
307902
2,633.19
1,587.40
307477
141 nn
CITY OF EDINA
307433
Council Check Register
100720
4/8/2005 - 4/14/2005
306791
PO # Doc No Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
109197
109259 T100135B 1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
109260 T100135C 1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
109195
307433
5842.5514
100720
109196
306791
5862.5515
YORK SELLING
109197
307420
5842.5514
BAKERY
109198
306790
5862.5514
5421.5510
109326
307902
5842.5514
109327
307477
5842.5513
109328
307901
5822.5514
101947
270966
411412005
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
100720
DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
16.02
BAKERY
109261
187386
5421.5510
16.02
270967
4114/2005
101947
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
660.00
1 ST QTR
CHARGES
109262
P07MN027060051
1400.6204
1,260.00
MDTS CHARGE
109426
P07MN027060M5J
1400.6160
1,920.00
270968
4/14/2005
101473
DEXTER SHOE CO.
74.58
SHOES
109427
550384
5440.5511
44.62
SHOES
109428
553366
5440.5511
84.90
SHOES
109429
555908
5440.5511
204.10
270969
4/14/2005
100739
EAGLE WINE
558.81
109329
214810
5842.5513
247.57
109553
214808
5822.5513
806.38
270970
4114/2005
100741
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
8,191.85
109199
325540
5842.5514
4,377.45
109200
325532
5862.5514
691.20
109330
325549
5842.5514
15.40
109331
325615
5842.5515
4,615.80
109332
325616
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD
TELETYPE SERVICE
DATA PROCESSING
4/13/2005 12:43:35
Page - 5
Business Unit
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
GRILL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
CITY OF EDINA
4/13/2005 12:43:35
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 6
4/8/2005
- 4/14/2005
Check #
Dale
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
1,899.20
109333
325531
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
911.85
109334
325594
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
20,702.75
270971
4/14/2005
100748 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY
25.28
FIT TEST SOLUTION
109503
227406 -00
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
25.28
270972
4/14/2005
105758 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE
203.50
STROBE BAR REPAIR
109430
RP033105 -4
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
203.50
270973
4/14/2005
105339 ENRGI
422.50
WEBSITE CONSULTING
109431
2633
2210.6124
WEB DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNICATIONS
422.50
270974
4114/2005
100297 FAST FOTO & DIGITAL
15.24
PHOTO FINISHING
109504
T2- 201543 _
1470.6408
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
37.28,
PHOTO FINISHING
109505
T2- 200511
2210.6408
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
COMMUNICATIONS
52.52
270975
4/1412005
113720 FASTENER PLACE
12.12
ANCHOR SLEEVES
109134
15011
1646.6530
REPAIR PARTS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
45.93
ANCHOR ADHESIVE KITS
109135
15044
1646.6530
REPAIR'PARTS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
58.05
270976
4/14/2005
100756 FEDERAL EXPRESS
21.74
SHIPPING CHARGES
109263
5-448 -05248
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
21.74
270977
4114/2005
116189 FILTRATION SYSTEMS INC.
1,699.41
RANGE FILTERS
109432
5598
7411.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PSTF OCCUPANCY
1,699.41
270978
411412005
101475 FOOTJOY
117.11
SHOES
109264
3309756
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
117.11
270979
4/14/2005
104071 FREUND, JEFF
30.00
PETTY CASH
109136
040505
5610.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
ED ADMINISTRATION
37.00
PETTY CASH
109136
040505
5610.6235
POSTAGE
ED ADMINISTRATION
232.10
PETTY CASH
109136
040505
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
109335 00015505
270987 4/1412005 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC
1,491.00 109201 71666
242.50 109336 71811
431 75 109337 71810
5862.5513
5842.5513
5862.5513
5822.5513
4/13/2005 12:43:35
Page - 7
Business Unit
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
270988 4/1412005 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC.
9,098.30 LIGHT POLES 109434 908081184 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION
199.50 LIGHT DIMMER 109435 908091275 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT
323.57 CIRCUIT BREAKERS 109436 908081185 5210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF DOME PROGRAM
CITY OF EDINA
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check
Register
4/8/2005
- 4/14/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
299.10
270980
4/14/2005
108632 GALLES CORPORATION
423.34
VEHICLE CLEANER
109137
108822
1470.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
423.34
270981
411412005
102419 GARDEN & ASSOCIATES INC
110.00
INTERPRETER
109265
40557
1400.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
110.00
270982
4/14/2005
105508 GEMPLER'S INC.
80.80
SAFETY GLASS
109266
1006100599
1646.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
56.20
GOOSE CONTROL
109433
1006120464
5422.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
137.00
270983
4/14/2005
100920 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY • MINNEA
1,144.30
PARTS
109267
033105
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
1,144.30
270984
4/1412005
101464 GIRARD'S BUSINESS SOLUTIONS IN
145.00
CHECK SIGNER REPAIR
109138
079351
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
145.00
270985
4/14/2005
101103 GRAINGER
4.39
SWITCH
109268
495 - 707135 -2
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
203.11
SPRAY PAINT, BATTERIES
109269
495- 725462 -8
1553.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
207.50
270986
4/14/2005
102670 GRAND PERE WINES INC
109335 00015505
270987 4/1412005 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC
1,491.00 109201 71666
242.50 109336 71811
431 75 109337 71810
5862.5513
5842.5513
5862.5513
5822.5513
4/13/2005 12:43:35
Page - 7
Business Unit
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
270988 4/1412005 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC.
9,098.30 LIGHT POLES 109434 908081184 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION
199.50 LIGHT DIMMER 109435 908091275 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT
323.57 CIRCUIT BREAKERS 109436 908081185 5210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF DOME PROGRAM
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
4/8/2005 -- 4/14/2005
Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
4/13/2005 12:43:35
Page - a
Business Unit
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
9,621.37
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
270989 4114/2005
YORK SELLING
100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
604.77
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
109202
213142
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
155.60-
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
109203
663448
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
21.55-
109204
663447
5842.5515
37.95-
109205
663203
5842.5513
1,152.55
109338
213143
5862.5512
854.46
109339
213141
5862.5512
3.40
109340
197755
5862.5515
.85
109341
197546
5862.5512
2.55
109342
214555
5862.5512
2.55
109343
214554
5842.5512
3,446.86
109344
213144
5842.5512
4,955.99
109345
213145
5842.5512
152,79
109554
215595
5842.5515
10,961.67
270990 4/14/2005
100787 GRUBER'S POWER EQUIPMENT
252.22
BELTS, SCREWS, WASHERS
109139
18789
1553.6530
21.07
BELT -DRIVE
109140
18817
1553.6530
273.29
270991 4/14/2005
101964 GUSTAVE A. LARSON CO.
716.59
OIL, REFRIGERANT
109437
BLM0088170
1301.6556
61.24
RELAY, START CAP
109438
BLM0088152
5430.6406
777.83
270992 4/14/2005
103359 HANSON PIPE & PRODUCTS INC.
325.89
ADJUSTING RINGS
109439
477005378266
5932.6536
325.89
270993 4/1412005
102301 HARTLAND FUEL PRODUCTS LLC
13,229.10
GAS
109270
650615
1553.6581
13,229.10
270994 4/1412005
101255 HASLER INC.
1,046.57
ANNUAL METER RENTAL
109506
5040961
1550.6151
1,046.57
270995 4/14/2005
105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION
52.02
TRANSACTION PROCESSING
109507
25037173
1190.6105
4/13/2005 12:43:35
Page - a
Business Unit
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE
GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
CASTINGS GENERAL STORM SEWER
GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING
R55CKREG LOG20000
109206
355582
5862.5514
CITY OF EDINA
VERNON SELLING
1,276.10
109207
355579
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
Council Check Register
77.85
109208
355580
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
4/8/2005 - 4/14/2005
109346
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
54.17
TRANSACTION PROCESSING
109507
25037173 1400.6160
DATA PROCESSING
SEASON TICKETS
EB /CL REVENUES
1,706.42
RADIO LEASE
109508
25038010 1470.6151
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
1,812.61
271001
4/14/2005
270996
4/14/2005
101717 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
571.91
215.00
UTILITY PERMIT
109271
UTIL00532 5913.6260
LICENSES & PERMITS
TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR
215.00
571.91
270997
4/14/2005
116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY
4114/2005
102664 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS
990.45
PC
109440
37754392 1495.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
240.39
COPIER MAINTENANCE
990.45
PC
109440
37754392 1260.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
1,980.90
270998
4114/2005
271003
104375 HOHENSTEINS INC.
101732 INDUSTRIAL DOOR CO. INC.
4/13/2005 12:43:35
Page - 9
Business Unit
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
DISTRIBUTION
INSPECTIONS
ENGINEERING GENERAL
426.00
109206
355582
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
1,276.10
109207
355579
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
77.85
109208
355580
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
32.10
109346
355583
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
31850
109347
355581
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
2,130.55
270999 4/14/2005 102114 HUEBSCH
101.93
TOWEL /RUG CLEANING
109141
230921
5620.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
EDINBOROUGH PARK
101.93
271000
4/14/2005
118074 HUSSEY, JUNE
250.00
SEASON PASS REFUND
109142
040505
5601.4532
SEASON TICKETS
EB /CL REVENUES
250.00
271001
4/14/2005
100811 HYDRO METERING TECHNOLOGY
571.91
METER & FLANGE SET
109272
0029339 -IN
5914.5516
COST OF GOODS SOLD METERS
TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR
571.91
271002
4114/2005
102664 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS
240.39
COPIER MAINTENANCE
109441
23656116
1628.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SENIOR CITIZENS
240.39
271003
4/14/2005
101732 INDUSTRIAL DOOR CO. INC.
140.00
GARAGE DOOR REPAIR
109442
0101276 -IN
1551.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
CITY HALL GENERAL
140.00
271004
4114/2005
101183 INSPECTRON INC.
CITY OF EDINA
4/1312005 12:43:35
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 10
4/8/2005
- 4/14/2005
Check # Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
6,437.50
MARCH INSPECTIONS
109443
040405
1495.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
INSPECTIONS
6,437.50
271005 4/14/2005
104696 INT'L SECURITY PRODUCTS
10,383.75
REPLACE CHAIN LINK FENCE
109273
17885
1647.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PATHS & HARD SURFACE
10,383.75
271006 4/14/2005
105530 ISO #271
1,500.00
GRANT TRANSFER TIPS
109509
040505
1600.4390.15
GEN ADAPTIVE REC
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
1,500.00
271007 4/1412005
101861 J.H. LARSON COMPANY
172.87
POWER CORD
109143
4470376 -01
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
5.86
CONNECTORS
109444
4470786 -02
1551.6530
REPAIR PARTS
CITY HALL GENERAL
57.67
ELBOWS, DRILL BIT
109445
4470786 -01
1551.6530
REPAIR PARTS
CITY HALL GENERAL
236.40
271008 4/1412005
100828 JERRY'S FOODS
16.64
109446
033105
1628.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SENIOR CITIZENS
52.05
109446
033105
1190.6106
MEETING EXPENSE
ASSESSING
61.56
109446
033105
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
89.52
109446
033105
1624.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PLAYGROUND & THEATER
219.77
271009 4114/2005
100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE
2.59
109274
033105
5820.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
50TH STREET GENERAL
3.49
109274
_ 033105
5840.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
4.49
109274
033105
2210.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COMMUNICATIONS
7,79
109274
033105
7411.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PSTF OCCUPANCY
11,38
109274
033105
1322.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
17.25
109274
033105
1495.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
INSPECTIONS
21.01
109274
033105
5511.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
30.94
109274
033105
4090.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET REVOLVING
37.56
109274
033105
1553.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
63.92
109274
033105
5210.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
87.22
109274
033105
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
89,96
109274
033105
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
96.97
109274
033105
5422.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
102,21
109274
033105
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
104.62
109274
033105
1325.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET NAME SIGNS
111,77
109274
033105
5420.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CLUB HOUSE
150.66
109274
033105
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 4/13/2005 12:43:35
Council Check Register Page - 11
4/8/2005 - 4114/2005
Check # Date Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
252.57
109274
033105
1301.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
463.62
109274
033105
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
798,11
109274
033105
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
930.22
109274
033105
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
1,101.11
109274
033105
1646.6556
TOOLS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
2,817.32
109274
033105
1301.6556
TOOLS
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
7,306.78
271010 4114/2005
100830 JERRY'S PRINTING
258.80
REGISTRATION FORMS
109447
32550
1600.6575
PRINTING
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
258.80
271012 4/1412005
100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.
1,163.75
109209
1876607
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
177,70
109210
1876594
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
422.80
109211
1876602
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
1,041.60
109212
187726
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
571.14
109213
1876611
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
46.45
109214
1876613
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
211.40
109215
1876615
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
2,537.71
109215
1876615
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,545.44
109216
1876609
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
1,260.55
109217
1876610
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
3,475.76
109218
1876612
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
30.20
109219
1876614
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
949.18
109220
1876597
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
550.90
109348
1876595
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
1,264.59
109349
1880333
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
473.70
109350
1880329
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,242.43
109351
1880317
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
770.63
109352
1880318
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
65.40
109353
1880319
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
447.20
109354
1880320
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
340.04
109355
1880316
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
109.45
109356
1880315
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
644.75
109357
1878384
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
66.00-
109358
277925
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
25.37-
109359
277924
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
1.721.82
109555
1880323
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
1,786.20
109556
1880321
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
394.95
109557
1880327
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
2,644.69
109558
1880328
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
CITY OF EDINA
4/13/2005 12:43:35
R55CKREG
LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 12
4/8/2005
- 4/14/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor I Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
4,891.62
109559
1880324
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
24.00
109560
1880325
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
30.20
109561
1880326
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
3,879.85
109562
1880322
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
34,624.73
271013
4/14/2005
106186 KAEDING & ASSOCIATES INC.
224.00
ENGINEERING SERVICES
109144
490408D
05448.1705.21
CONSULTING INSPECTION
WM448 WELL #16 6301 GLEASON
224.00
271014
4114/2005
111018 KEEPRS INC.
527.71
UNIFORM BADGES
109145
34931
1470.6558
DEPT UNIFORMS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
329.70
UNIFORM
109146
34854
1470.6558
DEPT UNIFORMS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
857.41
271015
4/14/2005
100841 KEPRIOS, JOHN
134.94
VETERINARY EXPENSE
109583
28375
5422.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES.
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
134.94
271016
4/14/2005
103078 KOMAREK, VIRGINIA
68.51
DRY CLEAN CUSHIONS
109448
040505
5421.6201
LAUNDRY
GRILL
68.51
271017
4/14/2005
101502 KONTERS, VIK
236.12
UNIFORM EXPENSE
109275
040505
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
236.12
_ 271018
4/14/2005
100846 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO
2,169.90
109221
431713
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
616.00
109222
431723
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
16.00
109360
431616
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
344.00
109361
431615
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
3,145.90
271019
4/14/2005
101935 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC.
36.86
FRONT BUMPER
109276
228828
1400.6215
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
36.86
271020
4/1412005
101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
75.00
LMC CONFERENCE
109581
1 -000021076
1100.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
CITY COUNCIL
75.00
LMC CONFERENCE
109582
1 -000021079
1120.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
ADMINISTRATION
150.00
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation
271021
4114/2005
118091 LEE, DAVID
4/812005 -
40.00
LOGO T- SHIRTS
PO # Doc No I
40.00
Account No S
271022
4/14/2005
109449 2
100853 LEEF SERVICES
1400.6203 U
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE P
33.44
SHOP TOWELS
367542 5
5422.6201 L
33.44
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
271023
4/14/2005
5100.1720 B
112619 LES JONES ROOFING INC
ART CENTER BALANCE SHEET
109511 3
5,732.00
FINAL PAYMENT
FIRST AID SUPPLIES F
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
5,732.00
040805 5
271024
4/14/2005
AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET
117026 LIFE- ASSIST INC.
040805 5
5301.4532 S
124.95
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
109147 2
2050866 1
124.95
REPAIR PARTS E
271025
4/14/2005
56089 5
118093 LOHANI, UDAY
GENERAL SUPPLIES P
POOL OPERATION
4.88
SEASON TICKET REFUND
5311.6406 G
GENERAL SUPPLIES P
75.12
SEASON TICKET REFUND
80.00
271026
4/14/2005
100864 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC.
2,169.11
BEARING CONES, CYLINDER KITS
2,169.11
271027
4/14/2005
100865 MAGNUSON SOD
21.19
CEMENT MIX
141.35
CEMENT MIX
162.54
271028
4/14/2005
114699 MANAGED SERVICES IN
420.68
APRIL 2005 SERVICE
420.68
271029
4/14/2005
118081 MANFRED, FREYA
46.80
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
46.80
271030
4/14/2005
102237 MANGEN, DEBRA
30.90
CONFERENCE EXPENSE
272.92
CONFERENCE EXPENSE
C.
109453 607186 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY
109277 033005 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES
109580 2005 -01 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION
109580 2005 -01 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION
CITY OF EDINA 4
4/13/2005 12:43:35
Council Check Register P
Page - 13
4/812005 -
- 4/14/2005
PO # Doc No I
Inv No A
Account No S
Subledger Account Description B
Business Unit
109449 2
203 1
1400.6203 U
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE P
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
109450 3
367542 5
5422.6201 L
LAUNDRY M
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
109510 5
512553BAL 5
5100.1720 B
BUILDINGS A
ART CENTER BALANCE SHEET
109511 3
374267 1
1470.6510 F
FIRST AID SUPPLIES F
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
109512 0
040805 5
5300.2039 S
SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE A
AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET
109512 0
040805 5
5301.4532 S
SEASON TICKETS A
AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES
109147 2
2050866 1
1553.6530 R
REPAIR PARTS E
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
109451 5
56089 5
5311.6406 G
GENERAL SUPPLIES P
POOL OPERATION
109452 5
56088 5
5311.6406 G
GENERAL SUPPLIES P
POOL OPERATION
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date
271031 4/14/2005
271032 4/14/2005
271033 4/14/2005
271034 4/14/2005
271035 4114/2005
271036 4/14/2005
CITY OF EDINA
4113/2005 12:43:35
Council Check
Register
Page - 14
4/8/2005
-4/14/2005
Amount
Vendor / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
303.82
100868 MARK VII SALES
.03 .
109223
, 781167
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
4,007.25
109224
781068
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
3,437.75
109225
781287
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
186.50
109226
781289
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
24.80
109227
781288
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
3,344.00
109228
781054
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
1,785.50
109229
778474
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
45.98
CORRECTION
109230
000178
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
1,489.75.
109362
781025
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
58.80
109363
.781026
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
14,380.36
101030 MATHISON CO.
130.48
OILS, PAPER
109278
597183-0
COST OF GOODS SOLD
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
42.82
CANVAS TACKS
109279
595202 -1
5120.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
266.34
WATER COLORS
109513
596462 -0:
5120.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
38.64
BRUSHES
109514
592462 -2
5120.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
76.91
OILS, WATER COLORS
109515
595767-0
5120.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
555.19
100870 MATRX
294.00
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
109516
886801
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
15.00
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
109517
886964
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
800.00
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
109518
886701
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
354.32
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
109519
886713
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
77.70
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
109520
886595
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1.541.02
103944 MED COMPASS
180.00
FACE MASK TESTING
109148
7933
5311.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
POOL OPERATION
180.00
101483 MENARDS
126.38
CONCRETE MIX, TOOLS
109280
12376
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES,
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
75.91
SHELF, BRACKETS
109454
13498
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
202.29
101987 MENARDS
22.34
FOIL TAPE, CRIMPER
109149
77663
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
4/8/2005 - 4/14/2005
Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
18.47 INSULATED VENTING 109150 77576 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
16 50- RETURN 109151 75179 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
CLEANING SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SAC CHARGES
4/13/2005 12:43:35
Page - 15
Business Unit
EDINBOROUGH PARK
CENTENNIAL LAKES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
FIELD MAINTENANCE
FIELD MAINTENANCE
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT
PUBLIC HEALTH
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
CLUB HOUSE
INSPECTIONS
OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SVC PW BUILDING
COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING
24.31
271037
4/14/2005
100882 MERIT SUPPLY
460.08
ROLL TOWELS, SOAP
109455
66620
1552.6511
460.08
271038
4/1412005
101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY
85.09
MARKING PAINT
109152
81581
1642.6406
271.31
SCREEN SECTIONS
109456
81819
1642.6406
356.40
271039
4/14/2005
100410 METROCALL
11.64
PAGERS
109281
02182194
5860.6406
11.64
PAGERS
109281
02182194
5111.6406
23.28
PAGERS
109281
02182194
1490.6406
34.92
PAGERS
109281
02182194
1646.6406
46.48
PAGERS
109281
02182194
5420.6406
127.96
271040
4114/2005
100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
89,001.00
MARCH 2005
109457
040805
1495.4307
89,001.00
271041
4114/2005
104650 MICRO CENTER
95.84
HARDDRIVE
109458
869026
5110.6513
127.79
LAPTOP HDD
109458
869026
1552.6710
223.63
271042
411412005
100019 MIDWEST ART FAIRS
47.70
CONSIGNMENT SALES
109282
3481
5120.5510
47.70
271043
4114/2005
100692 MIDWEST COCA -COLA EAGAN
451.40
109364
82501185
5862.5515
114.50
109365
82501110
5822.5515
565.90
271044
4/14/2005
101320 MINNEAPOLIS AREA ASSOC OF
REAL
162.00
MLS ACCESS FEES
109521
1282635,36
1190.6105
162.00
CLEANING SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SAC CHARGES
4/13/2005 12:43:35
Page - 15
Business Unit
EDINBOROUGH PARK
CENTENNIAL LAKES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
FIELD MAINTENANCE
FIELD MAINTENANCE
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT
PUBLIC HEALTH
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
CLUB HOUSE
INSPECTIONS
OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SVC PW BUILDING
COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING
4/1312005 12:43:35
Page - 16
Business Unit
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
GRILL
DISTRIBUTION
DISTRIBUTION
96.09.
APRIL SERVICE
109153
CITY OF EDINA
5620.6230
R55CKREG LOG20000
EDINBOROUGH PARK
96.09
271048
Council Check Register
100899 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER
4/8/2005
-- 4/14/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor I Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
271045
4114/2005
102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY
271049
4/14/2005
5.61
PROPANE
109460
R103051481
1322.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
32.28
CO2 STMT
109461
GUST 30220
5421.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
37.89
51.12
271046
4/14/2005
100913 MINNEAPOLIS SUBURBAN SEWER
8 W
100898 MINVALCO
850.00
WATER SERVICE REPAIR
109283
32647
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
109156
484648
1,360.00
WATER SERVICE REPAIR
109459
32649
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
2,210.00
271051
4114/2005
271047
4/1412005
100903 MINNESOTA ELEVATOR INC
4/1312005 12:43:35
Page - 16
Business Unit
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
GRILL
DISTRIBUTION
DISTRIBUTION
/ .
96.09.
APRIL SERVICE
109153
71107
5620.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
EDINBOROUGH PARK
96.09
271048
4/14/2005
100899 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER
8,324.40
MARCH 2005
109462
040605
1495.4380
SURCHARGE
INSPECTIONS
8,324.40
271049
4/14/2005
100908 MINNESOTA WANNER
51.12
MACHINE LOCK
109155
0063435 -IN
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
51.12
271050
411412005
100898 MINVALCO
83.87
REFRIGERANT
109156
484648
5430.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
83.87
271051
4114/2005
101917 MN FIRE SERVICE CERTIFICATION
220.00
FFI CERTIFICATION FEES
109154
040105
1470.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
220.00
271052
4/14/2005
100159 MOOERS PRINTING INC.
434.52
EMS REPORT FORMS
109522
3946
.1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
434.52
271053
4114/2005
100789 MOORE MEDICAL CORP.
110.90
MEDICAL BAG SUPPLIES
109284
9368931BRI
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
79.09
MEDICAL BAG
109463
93694673RI
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
189.99
271054
4114/2005
100092 MPSA
60.00
APR 21 MEETING
109464
040805
1640.6104
CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS
PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL
/ .
4/1312005 12:43:35
Page - 17
Business Unit
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
ADAPTIVE RECREATION
1,680.00 109366 30694 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
716 00 109367 30693 5822 5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
2,396.00
CITY OF EDINA
R55CKREG LOG20000
271058
4/14/2005
104672 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
Council Check Register
825.01
109157
4/8/2005 — 4/14/2005
1470.6151
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
60.00
271059
4114/2005
271055
4/1412005
100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC.
25.97
268.68
MOWER LIGHTS
109465 453915 -00 5422.6530
REPAIR PARTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
268.68
25.97
271056
4/14/2005
103224 NELSON, LARRY
411412005
103133 NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT
450.00
ADAPTIVE GOLF INSTRUCTOR
109523 040805 1629.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1,273.78
450.00
109524
13642337
5422.6530
271057
4/14/2005
100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO.
4/1312005 12:43:35
Page - 17
Business Unit
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
ADAPTIVE RECREATION
1,680.00 109366 30694 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
716 00 109367 30693 5822 5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
FIELD MAINTENANCE
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
COLLECTION SYSTEMS
POOL ADMINISTRATION
460.00 ANTENNA 109468 10658 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
2,396.00
271058
4/14/2005
104672 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
825.01
109157
757391129028
1470.6151
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
825.01
271059
4114/2005
101886 NICHOLS NET & TWINE INC.
25.97
TWINE
109158
30339
1642.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
25.97
271060
411412005
103133 NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT
1,273.78
PUMP PART
109524
13642337
5422.6530
REPAIR PARTS
1,273.78
271061
4114/2005
100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY
53.46
PAPER
109525
31205600
5120.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
137.62
PRISMACOLOR PENCILS
109526
31213600
5120.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
191.08
271062
4/1412005
100936 OLSEN COMPANIES
25.34
SLEDGE HAMMER
109466
330374
5923.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
25.34
271063
4/14/2005
118089 OPPORTUNITY PARTNERS
1,631.39
BROCHURE PACKAGING
109467
102157
5310.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1,631.39
271064
4/1412005
117993 P & H SERVICES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
FIELD MAINTENANCE
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
COLLECTION SYSTEMS
POOL ADMINISTRATION
460.00 ANTENNA 109468 10658 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
CITY OF EDINA
4/13/2005 12:43:35
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 18
4/8/2005
- 4/14/2005
Check # Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
460.00
271065 4/14/2005
100347 PAUSTIS & SONS.
136.00
109231
8064961 -IN
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
59.85
109232
8065196 -IN
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
26.00
109233
8065191 -IN
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER-
VERNON SELLING
369.50
109233
8065191 -IN
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,471.49
109368
8065880 -IN
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
2,008.70
109369
8065878 -IN
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
781.40
109563
8065879 -IN
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
4,852.94
271066 4114/2005
102963 PELUF, JIM
24.95
UNIFORM PURCHASE
109159
040105
1301.6201
LAUNDRY
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
24.95
271067 4114/2005
100946 PERA
78,725.20
PPEND 415/05
109469
040805
1000.2023
P.E.R.A. PAYABLE
GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
78,725.20
271069 4/14/2005
100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
5,148.12
109234
2181322
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
47.20
109235
2181317
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
7,228.35
109236
2181318
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
1,345.15
109237
2181314
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
1,161.56
109238
2181320
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,557.51
109239
2181321
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
100.95
109240
2181319
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
94.40
109370
2183991
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
601.05
109371
2183989
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
3,904.49
109372
2183990
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
349.20
109373
2183980
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
311.40
109374
2183982
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
416.25
109375
2183983
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
,95
109376
2181309
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
138.35
109377.
2180994
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
67.45-
109378
3315831
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
11.09-
109379
.3316032
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
67.10-
109380
3315960
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
2,833.10
109564
2183981
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
637.39
109565
2183984
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
35.70
109566
2183987
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
CITY OF EDINA
4/1312005 12:43:35
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 19
41812005
- 4/14/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor I Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
2,517.90
109567
2183985
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
28,283.38
271070
4/14/2005
102748 PIRTEK PLYMOUTH
600.82
HOSE, FLANGE, ASSEMBLY
109285
PL27157
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
600.82
271071
4114/2005
101110 POLLY NORMAN PHOTOGRAPHY
50.00
ABOUT BUSINESS PHOTOS
109160
033105
2210.6123
MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE
COMMUNICATIONS
50.00
271072
411412005
101934 POSITIVE PROMOTIONS
87.38
PENS
109470
02008176
1628.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SENIOR CITIZENS
87.38
271073
4114/2005
100961 POSTMASTER
350.00
NEWSLETTER POSTAGE
109527
041105
1628.6235
POSTAGE
SENIOR CITIZENS
350.00
271074
4/14/2005
101032 PRINT SHOP, THE
610.72
NEWSLETTER
109471
IPIO0919
1628.6575
PRINTING
SENIOR CITIZENS
610.72
271075
4/1412005
100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY
2,579.85
109241
211534
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
33.91-
109242
663439
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
384.24
109381
214809
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
765.30
109382
213071
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,244.94
109383
214807
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
5,370.30
109384
211532
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
815.54
109385
214811
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
514.25
109568
216660
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
11,640.51
271076
411412005
106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY
378.52
ROLL TOWEL, TISSUE
109161
3524
5620.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
378.52
271077
4114/2005
100971 QUALITY WINE
32.61-
109386
535809 -00
5860.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
1,645.51
109386
535809 -00
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
65.84-
109387
533200 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
CITY OF EDINA
4/13/2005 12:43:35
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 20
4/8/2005
- 4/14/2005
Check # Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
13.11-
109388
535706 -00
5840.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
1,321.71
109388
535706 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
4.56-
109389
535685 -00
5840.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
463.44
109389
535685 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
68.11-
109390
535827 -00
5840.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
3,431.97
109390
535827 -00
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
5.64-
109391
535684 -00
5860.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
572.34
109391
535684 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
7.52-
109392
535707 -00
5860.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
759.71
109392
535707 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
37.30-
109393
535810 -00
5820.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
50TH STREET GENERAL
1,876.87
109393
535810 -00
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
5.88-
109569
534803 -00
5820.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
50TH STREET GENERAL
594.46
109569
534803 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING '
11.01-
109570
534986 -00
5820.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
50TH STREET GENERAL
1,112.92
109570
534986 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
11,527.35
271078 4/14/2005
118088 QUINN, MARGARET
52.00
TRIP REFUND
109472
040705
1628.4392.07
SENIOR TRIPS
SENIOR CITIZENS
52.00
271079 4/14/2005
101965 QWEST
51.19
952 926 -0092
109573
0092 -4/05
5913.6188
TELEPHONE
DISTRIBUTION
283.97
612 E24 -8661
109574
8661 -4/05
1550.6188
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
876.00
612 E01 -0426
109575
0426 -4/05
1550.6188
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
567.94
612 E24 -8659
109576
8659 -4105
1470.6188
TELEPHONE
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
506.42
612 E24 -8657
109577
8657 - 4/05
5420.6188
TELEPHONE
CLUB HOUSE
283.97
612 E24 -8656
109578
8656 -4/05
1550.6188
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
91.13
952 926 -0419
109579
0419 -4/05
1646.6188
TELEPHONE
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
2,660.62
271080 411412005
117692 R & B CLEANING INC.
447.30
FEB RAMP CLEANING
109286
1199
1375.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PARKING RAMP
447.30
APRIL RAMP CLEANING
109287
1202
1375.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PARKING RAMP
894.60
271081 4114/2005
113422 RAKE PUBLISHING INC.
153.33
MAGAZINE ADVERTISING
109473
5795
5822.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
50TH ST SELLING
153.33
MAGAZINE ADVERTISING
109473
5795
5862.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
VERNON SELLING
153.34
MAGAZINE ADVERTISING
109473
5795
5842.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
YORK SELLING
460.00
CITY OF EDINA
4/13/2005 12:43:35
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 21
4/8/2005
- 4/14/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
271082
4114/2005
101111 REED BUSINESS INFORMATION
92.92
AD FOR BID
109529
2831423
1120.6120
ADVERTISING LEGAL
ADMINISTRATION
101.00
AD FOR BID
109530
2846059
1120.6120
ADVERTISING LEGAL
ADMINISTRATION
92.92
AD FOR BID
109531
2846058
1120.6120
ADVERTISING LEGAL
ADMINISTRATION
101.00
AD FOR BID
109532
2850208
1120.6120
ADVERTISING LEGAL
ADMINISTRATION
92.92
AD FOR BID
109533
2850207
1120.6120
ADVERTISING LEGAL
ADMINISTRATION
480.76
271083
4114/2005
102011 RIVER CITY JAZZ ORCHESTRA
150.00
PERFORMANCE 4/26/05
109528
040105
5610.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
ED ADMINISTRATION
150.00
271084
4/14/2005
117408 RJ MARCO CONSTRUCTION INC.
26,600.00
POOL RENOVATION
109162
032905
5300.1705
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET
26,600.00
271085
4/14/2005
105534 ROTARY CLUB OF EDINA/MORNINGSI
195.00
DUES
109474
336
1120.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
ADMINISTRATION
195.00
271086
4/1412005
118001 ROZEBOOM MILLER ARCHITECTS
INC
20,986.19
ARCHITECT /ENG SERVICES
109288
2
1500.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CONTINGENCIES
20,986.19
271087
4114/2005
118087 RUSSELL, MARGARET
52.00
TRIP REFUND
109475
040705
1628.4392.07
SENIOR TRIPS
SENIOR CITIZENS
52.00
271088
4/1412005
101562 SAWYER, CHERYL
100.00
PERFORMANCE 4/28/05
109534
040105
5610.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
ED ADMINISTRATION
100.00
271089
4/14/2005
100990 SCHARBER & SONS
15.18
O- RINGS, GASKET
109289
331180
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
15.18
271090
411412005
105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO.
62.88
PLYWOOD
109290
40061030
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
204.48
PAINT
109291
40061136
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
108.63
BENCH BOARDS
109476
40057603
5431.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE
375.99
l
CITY OF EDINA
4/13/2005 12:43:35
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check
Register
Page - 22
4/8/2005
-- 4/14/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
271091
4/14/2005
118092 SCHMIDT, JIM
19.00
UPGRADE LICENSE
109477
040805
1553.6260
LICENSES & PERMITS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
19.00
271092
4/1412005
118080 SCHUVEILLER, MAREN
79.00
CLASS REFUND
109292
040505
5101.4607
CLASS REGISTRATION
ART CENTER REVENUES
79.00
271093
4/1412005
116905 SCREENING AND SELECTION SERVIC
76.00
DRUG TESTING
109163
825502
1550.6121
ADVERTISING PERSONNEL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
76.00
271094
4/14/2005
102644 SEABOARD PENCIL COMPANY
540.40
PENCILS
109478
4183
5410.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
540.40
271095
4/14/2005
104689 SERIGRAPHICS SIGN SYSTEMS INC.
242.50
SIGN CHARGE
109535
36587
1551.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CITY HALL GENERAL
242.50
271096
4114/2005
116910 SHARP IMPRESSIONS
1,219.43
EVENT BROCHURES
109164
05 -158
2210.6575
PRINTING
COMMUNICATIONS
1,219.43
271097
4/1412005
101383 SIITARI, MICHAEL
72.00
VOLUNTEER DINNER
109293
040405
1400.6106
MEETING EXPENSE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
18.23
REIMBURSEMENT
109479
040805
1400.6106
MEETING EXPENSE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
50.23
PLAQUE
109479
040805
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
140.46
271098
4/14/2005
105286 SMITH & WESSON
159.79
TRAINING ITEMS
109480
0613277
1400.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
159.79
271099
4/1412005
100629 SMITH, AMY
281.76
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
109481
040705
5410.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
281.76
271100
4/14/2005
101002 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS INC
1,970.35
109394
' 163050
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
60.85
109395
163051
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
l
CITY OF EDINA
4/13/2005 12:43:35
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check
Register
Page - 23
4/8/2005
— 4114/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor! Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
18.30
109396
163047
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
998.45
109397
163046
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
3,047.95
271101
411412005
105193 SPAIN, MARK
1,995.00
TREE REMOVAL
109294
PO 5488
4088.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
TREE REMOVAL
2,350.00
TREE WORK
109482
040805
5422.6541
PLANTINGS & TREES
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
4,345.00
271102
4/14/2005
118082 SPECTRUM CUSTOM DESIGNS INC.
2,400.00
GARBAGE BINS
109295
13421
4090.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET REVOLVING
2,400.00
271103
4/14/2005
118079 SPENCER, JAN
158.00
CLASS REFUND
109296
040505
5101.4607
CLASS REGISTRATION
ART CENTER REVENUES
158.00
271104
4114/2005
101004 SPS COMPANIES
94.70
ACETYLENE TIPS
109165
S1209094.001
1646.6556
TOOLS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
6.56
PIPE, NIPPLE, CAP
109297
51210537.001
1646.6530
REPAIR PARTS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
36.98
NIPPLES
109298
S1210400.001
1646.6530.
REPAIR PARTS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
303.72
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
109483
S1211827.001
1646.6530
REPAIR PARTS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
441.96
271105
411412005
118090 SRIXON SPORTS USA INC.
162.00
MERCHANDISE
109484
40012497
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
162.00
271106
4114/2005
116175 ST. CROIX HARLEY - DAVIDSON
112.78
EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION
109299
353762
1400.6215
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
1,258.90
EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION
109300
353244
1400.6215
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
1,371.68
271107
4114/2005
103658 ST. LOUIS PARK COMMUNITY BAND
100.00
PERFORMANCE 4/17/05
109536
040105
5610.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
ED ADMINISTRATION
100.00
271108
4/14/2005
101007 STAR TRIBUNE
681.84
WANT AD
109301
033105
1550.6121
ADVERTISING PERSONNEL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
681.84
271109
4114/2005
106030 STRATEGIC EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY
1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
4/13/2005 12:43:35
Page - 24
Business Unit
ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
1120.6120
128.66
ADMINISTRATION
CITY OF EDINA
ADVERTISING LEGAL
R55CKREG LOG20000
1120.6120
101765 STROH, STEVE
ADMINISTRATION
1120.6120
ADVERTISING LEGAL
487.00
TUITION REIMBURSEMENT
Council Check Register
040505
1120.6120
487.00
ADMINISTRATION
4/8/2005 - 4/14/2005
ADVERTISING LEGAL
Check # Date Amount
Vendor / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
14.23
COFFEE FILTERS
109537
578863 5111.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
14.23
101.89
AD FOR BID
109539
762754
271110 4/14/2005
101015 STREICHERS
AD FOR BID
109540
762755
86.11
INTOX MOUTHPIECES
109302
1258177 1400.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
42.55
DRESS BELT
109485
1259227 1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
4/13/2005 12:43:35
Page - 24
Business Unit
ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
1120.6120
128.66
ADMINISTRATION
1120.6120
ADVERTISING LEGAL
271111 4/14/2005
1120.6120
101765 STROH, STEVE
ADMINISTRATION
1120.6120
ADVERTISING LEGAL
487.00
TUITION REIMBURSEMENT
109303
040505
1120.6120
487.00
ADMINISTRATION
1120.6120
ADVERTISING LEGAL
271112 4/14/2005
1120.6120
100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS
ADMINISTRATION
1120.6120,
ADVERTISING LEGAL
135.85
ENG DEPT AFB
109538
761486
1120.6120
101.89
AD FOR BID
109539
762754
ADMINISTRATION
91.15
AD FOR BID
109540
762755
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
39.33
2005 BD OF REVIEW
109541
764400
57.20
SOUTHDALE PH
109542
764402
46.48
50TH&FRANCE TEMP LIC
109543
765908
68.78
PH NOTICE
109544
768045
75.08
PH NOTICE
109545
768031
69.71
PH NOTICE
109546
768033
85.80
PH NOTICE
109547
768037
101.89
PH NOTICE
109548
768040
60.78
ORD 2005 -02
109549
768043
933.94
271113 4/14/2005
114800 SUPERIOR WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT I
4,240.00
REMOVAL OF DEER
109166
B2040405
4,240.00
271114 4/1412005
111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC.
35.00
BEERLINE CLEANING
109304
743229
35.00
271115 4/14/2005
117686 TECHNA GRAPHICS
601.73
TIMECARDS
109486
500631 -01
601.73
271116 4/14/2005
118083 THOMAS TOOL AND SUPPLY INC.
372.74
IMPACT WRENCH
109305
893497
372.74
1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
4/13/2005 12:43:35
Page - 24
Business Unit
ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
1120.6120
ADVERTISING LEGAL
ADMINISTRATION
1120.6120
ADVERTISING LEGAL
ADMINISTRATION
1120.6120
ADVERTISING LEGAL
ADMINISTRATION
1120.6120
ADVERTISING LEGAL
ADMINISTRATION
1120.6120
ADVERTISING LEGAL
ADMINISTRATION
1120.6120
ADVERTISING LEGAL
ADMINISTRATION
1120.6120
ADVERTISING LEGAL
ADMINISTRATION
1120.6120
ADVERTISING LEGAL
ADMINISTRATION
1120.6120,
ADVERTISING LEGAL
ADMINISTRATION
1120.6120
ADVERTISING LEGAL
ADMINISTRATION
1120.6120
ADVERTISING LEGAL
ADMINISTRATION
1120.6120
ADVERTISING LEGAL
ADMINISTRATION
1509.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
DEER CONTROL
5421.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
GRILL
1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
1301.6556 TOOLS
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
CITY OF EDINA
4/13/2005 12:43:35
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 25
418/2005
— 4/14/2005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
271117
4/14/2005
101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
321.60
109243
367989
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
1,108.90
109244
367636
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
30.80-
109245
365429CR
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
1,399.70
271118
4114/2005
104347 TIERNEY BROTHERS INC.
42.60
OVERHEAD BULBS
109487
470483 -1
1628.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
SENIOR CITIZENS
42.60
271119
4/14/2005
101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY
19.35
WELDING DEMURRAGE
109488
471014
5913.6580
WELDING SUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
83.82
WELDING SUPPLIES
109489
471012
1553.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
103.17
271120
4114/2005
117992 TOSHIBA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS
23.66
COPIER MAINTENANCE
109490
CNIN022887
1400.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
23.66
271121
4/14/2005
103982 TRAFFIC CONTROL CORPORATION
367.90
AMBER LENSES
109306
15521
1330.6530
REPAIR PARTS
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
367.90
271122
4/14/2005
104064 TRANS UNION LLC
49.24
CREDIT CHECK
109307
03551521
1400.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
49.24
271123
4/1412005
101045 TURF SUPPLY COMPANY
1,076.93
GOLF COURSE ACCESSORIES
109491
095960
5422.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
1,076.93
271124
4/14/2005
101047 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO
435.10
DOOR REPAIR
109167
234204
5630.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
CENTENNIAL LAKES
435.10
271125
4/1412005
101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE
51.32
BLADE MARATHON
109168
105392
5311.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POOL OPERATION
505.50
DOOR FRAME MATERIALS
109169
105391
5311.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POOL OPERATION
556.82
271126
4/14/2005
102255 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO
CITY OF EDINA
4/13/2005 12:43:35
R55CKREG
LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 26
4/8/2005
- 4/1412005
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
80.35
OXYGEN
109170
819949
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
43.02
OXYGEN
109550
820990
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
123.37
271127
4/14/2005
101172 TWIN CITY SAW CO.
391.30
SAW REPAIR
109492
A11119
5422.6530
REPAIR PARTS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
391.30
271128
4114/2005
.101908 US FOODSERVICE INC
115.17
CUST 114300
109494
040105STMT
5421.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GRILL
1,101.71
CUST 114300
109494
040105STMT
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
1,216.88
271129
4/14/2005.
114236 USA BLUE BOOK
549.98
PROBE
109493
954891
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
549.98
271130
4/1412005
101058 VAN PAPER CO.
596.40
CAN LINERS
109171
575580
1645.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
LITTER REMOVAL
117.88
CAN LINERS, TOWELS
109308
575582
5111.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT
714.28
271131
4/1412005
101060 VANTAGE ELECTRIC
683.00
REPLACE TRANSFORMER, BALLASTS
109172
18150
5620.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
683.00
271132
4/1412005
101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC.
32.67
DECALS
109495
18206
5423.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GOLF CARS
32.67
271133
4/14/2005
101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY
667.21
STRUTS, ELBOWS, CONDUIT
109173
8906080
1551.6530
REPAIR PARTS
CITY HALL GENERAL
437.72
PANELBOARD
109174
8906339
1551.6530
REPAIR PARTS
CITY HALL GENERAL
1,953.21
PANELBOARD
109175
8906273
1551.6530 _
REPAIR PARTS
CITY HALL GENERAL
221.53
STRUTS, CLAMPS, HANGERS
109176
8908157
1551.6530
REPAIR PARTS
CITY HALL GENERAL
3,279.67
271134
4/14/2005
104820 VOELKER, JAMES
189.00
CLASS FEES
109496
040605
1281.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
TRAINING
189.00
271115
4114/2005
103466 WASTE MANAGEMENT - SAVAGE MN
CITY OF
EDINA
4/13/2005 12:43:35
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 27
4/8/2005
- 4/14/2005
Check # Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
34.86
RUBBISH REMOVAL
109309
303948222821
5620.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
EDINBOROUGH PARK
2,976.80
REFUSE
109310
304438122828
4095.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
50TH STREET RUBBISH
2,939.54
REFUSE
109311
30388482282-4
4095.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
50TH STREET RUBBISH
5,951.20
271136 4114/2005
101075 WEIGLE, SUE
90.00
CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
109497
040705
1600.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
90.00
271137 4/14/2005
101078 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT
134.50
TANK LEAK REPAIR
109177
0027908 -IN
1552.6530
REPAIR PARTS
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
134.50
271138 4/1412005
101033 WINE COMPANY, THE
629.20
109246
112475 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
893.20
109398
112801 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
510.40
109399
112853 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
617.75
109571
112800 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
2,650.55
271139 4/14/2005
101312 WINE MERCHANTS
684.67
109247
120812
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
1,074.89
109400
121355
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
408.37
109401
121353
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
20.00-
109402
24099
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
919.94
109572
121354
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
3,067.87
271140 4/14/2005
101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC
68.00
109248
162884
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
1,004.75
109403
163077
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
813.00
109404
163019
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
605.00
109405
163138
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
2,490.75
271141 4/14/2005
101726 XCEL ENERGY
114.62
109178
21945686
5932.6185
LIGHT & POWER
GENERAL STORM SEWER
201.56
109179
21954190
5422.6185
LIGHT & POWER
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
140.90
109180
21957729
1481.6185
LIGHT & POWER
YORK FIRE STATION
734.37
109180
21957729
1470.6185
LIGHT & POWER
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
93.78
109181
21957455
5933.6185
LIGHT & POWER
PONDS & LAKES
148.69
109182
21958758
4086.6185
LIGHT & POWER
AQUATIC WEEDS
32,103.06
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
CITY
OF EDINA
271142 4114/2005
R55CKREG LOG20000
1550.6151
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
326.28
MARCH USAGE - BLDG
109317
008931379
Council Check Register
MARCH USAGE - ADMIN
109318
008931377
4/8/2005
- 4/14/2005
109319
Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
4,024.07
109183
22099292
1330.6185
LIGHT & POWER
37.90
109184
22198528
5311.6185
LIGHT & POWER
258.57
109312
22055628
5913.6185
LIGHT & POWER
592.64
109313
22093915
5821.6185
LIGHT & POWER -
937.81
109313
22093915
5841.6185
LIGHT & POWER
2,129.96
109313
22093915
5861.6185
LIGHT & POWER
2,748.97
109314
22365423
5913.6185
LIGHT & POWER
2,701.14 _
109315
22339030
7411.6185
LIGHT & POWER
3,794.76
109316
22099291
1330.6185
LIGHT & POWER
6,594.86
109584
22560545
5913.6185
LIGHT & POWER
334.12
109585
22560522
5913.6185
LIGHT & POWER
6 514 34
109586
22560542
5913.6185
LIGHT & POWER
32,103.06
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
1550.6151
271142 4114/2005
100568 XEROX CORPORATION
1550.6151
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
326.28
MARCH USAGE - BLDG
109317
008931379
439.55
MARCH USAGE - ADMIN
109318
008931377
176.20
MARCH USAGE -P & R
109319
008931380
108.41
MARCH USAGE
109320
008931543
376.62
MARCH USAGE
109498
008931378
1,427.06
271143 4/14/2005
118028 YAHOOI CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS
20.37
COST OF ADMIN SUBPOENA
109499
040705
20.37
271144 411412005
106424 YELLOW BOOK USA
4/13/2005 12:43:35
Page - 28
Business Unit
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
POOL OPERATION
DISTRIBUTION
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
YORK OCCUPANCY
VERNON OCCUPANCY
DISTRIBUTION
PSTF OCCUPANCY
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
DISTRIBUTION
DISTRIBUTION
DISTRIBUTION
1550.6151
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
1550.6151
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
1550.6151
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
5110.6151
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
1400.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
345.00 612- 915 -6600 109551 ID 276515 5110.6122
345.00
271145 4114/2005 101091 ZIEGLER INC
345.00 GENERATOR CONTRACT 109500 E3809713
345.00
631,236.46 Grand Total
ADVERTISING OTHER
1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS
Payment Instrument Totals
Check Total 631,236.46
Total Payments 631,236.46
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
CITY HALL GENERAL
R55CKSUM LOG20000
Company
Amount
01000 GENERAL FUND
308,511.80
02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND
1,733.70
04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND
21,558.97
05100 ART CENTER FUND
10,332.66
05200 GOLF DOME FUND
11,853.33
05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND
38,346.95
05400 GOLF COURSE FUND
12,066.83
05500 ICE ARENA FUND
9,875.00
05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND
4,634.68
05800 LIQUOR FUND
180,229.01
05900 UTILITY FUND
26,083.67
05930 STORM SEWER FUND
534.29
07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND
5,475.57
Report Totals 631,236.46
CITY OF EDINA 4/13/2005 12:46:08
Council Check Summary Page - 1
4/8/2005 - 411412005
We confirm to the best of our knowledge
and belief, that these claims
comply in all material respects
with the requirements of the City
of Edina purchasing tides and
procedures d
Fi
City
oe
•���0ap
,aaa
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # VIII. A.
From: Debra Mangen Consent
City Clerk Information Only
Date: April 19, 2005 Mgr. Recommends F] To HRA
®. To- Council
Subject: Receive petition
Action ® Motion .
F1Resolution
Ordinance
0
Discussion
Recommendation:
Refer the petition received to Engineering for processing as to. feasibility.
Info/Background:
The City received a petition circulated by Nancy Hopf and Manchilo Vucenich
requesting street lighting be installed at 5900 Vernon Avenue. There were nineteen
property owners from Vernon Avenue and Vernon Lane signing the petition. The
City's normal procedure is to refer the petition to the Engineering Department for
processing as to feasibility.
D
0
0
s
AN r�i.
o _ @ �, City of Edina, Minnesota
CITY COUNCIL
fro a� 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424
(612) 927 -8861 • (612) 927 - 7645 -FAX • (612) 927 - 5461 -TDD
•PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL
❑ SIDEWALK
❑ STORM SEWER
❑ ALLEY PAVING
El SANITARY SEWER
❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET
SURFACING WITH
CURB AND GUTTER
To the Mayor and City Council:
Apr, - 7 iii
❑ WATERMAIN
STREET LIGHTING
❑ OTHER:
The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to
the locations listed below.
���C �(J�► "�'lu�% between and
LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS
between and
LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS
between
LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME
between
LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME
ADDRESS
ADDRESS
and
ADDRESS
and
ADDRESS
IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT
THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE
PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE
COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES.
PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S
SIGNATURE (PRINTED) PHONE {7
U
This petition was circulated by:
ssa i�Cn�/o,�� 1 -.t►✓� 9s�� ad's =��a6
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
There is space for more signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages. SEPTEMMM 1990
PROPERTY-,OWNER S OWNER'S NAME
SIGNA (PATE )
akf
6Al
PROPERTY ADDRESS
S J, 1
OWNER'S
PHONE
C I
evgokj
Vev Acm -d.c
Alhlx- y,of
.3-�iC�` �J�nrfar C�•
9 a- �r�s- ? f��
o 5`nc C(-9 5 si
_v
rm C� F,37V- 9a2-c;); 7-
: 77', v 1 :5-? r/ 1J —mc,,-i �n 9&a -,S � b
;SAW ET Fo L1, s N s &i�
EDINA PARK BOARD
7:00 P.M.
EDINA COMMUNITY ROOM
EDINA CITY HALL
MARCH 8, 2005
MEMBERS PRESENT: George Klus, Jeff Johnson, Mike Weiss, Mike Damman, Linda
Presthus, Jessica Selleck, Todd Fronek, Jeff Sorem
MEMBERS ABSENT: Karla Sitek, Andy Finsness
STAFF PRESENT: John Keprios, Ed MacHolda, Janet Canton
OTHERS PRESENT: Idelle Longman, Paul Selcke
I. ALICE HULBERT
Mr. Klus informed the Park Board that he asked Dr. Hulbert if she would attend the first
part of the Park Board so that everyone can thank her and let her know that they
appreciate everything she has done this past year. He pointed out that Dr. Hulbert has
contributed a lot and has helped to cultivate some very good discussion.
Dr. Hulbert commented that the Park Board has been a wonderful group of people to
work with and has very much enjoyed her time on the Park Board. She noted that her
only regret is that she cannot serve on both the City Council and Park Board. Dr. Hulbert
indicated that she really appreciates all of the mentoring into the ways of the city that she
has received since being on the Park Board. She added that the Park Board was her
inspiration for deciding to run for City Council. Dr. Hulbert stressed that she is so
amazed at the amount of time and volunteerism that everyone has put into this and how
they have brought something before the board, prioritized it and did something about it.
She stated she has learned a lot and it has been a lot of fun.
Mr. Keprios congratulated Dr. Hulbert on being appointed to the City Council and
thanked her for all of the support she has given the Park Board and knows that she will
carry that out on the City Council.
Mr. Klus asked the Park Board members to e-mail him any names of people that they
would like Mayor Hovland to consider before he makes his appointment of the Park
Board member.
H. APPROVAL OF THE FEBRUARY 8, 2005 PARK BOARD MINUTES
Linda Presthus MOVED TO APPROVE THE FEBRUARY 8, 2005 PARK BOARD
MINUTES. Mike Weiss SECONDED THE MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED
III. "PARKS AND RECREATION — YOUR BEST INVESTMENT" 12- MINUTE
VIDEO
Mr. Keprios showed the Park Board a video on parks and recreation.
IV. ADVENTURE PEAK KARE 11 NEWS STORY
Mr. Keprios showed the Park Board a news story that was recently aired on KARE 11
news talking about Adventure Peak.
V.' UPDATES
A. Braemar Athletic Field Project — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that bids were
opened on February 24`h to renovate the Braemar athletic fields, and there is $312,000 in
the budget for this as part of the capital improvement plan. He noted there were four bids
submitted to which the low bid was Veit Companies whose bid came in at $277,700. Mr.
Keprios commented this is a good company who has experience and they hope to begin
the project in June and if all goes well it will be done around August Is' after which they
will start seeding. He noted that we would probably be able to use the field by mid to late
June of 2006 and added that it will be the premier field in Minnesota when it's done.
B. Koietin Park Plavgound Equipment — Mr. MacHolda informed the Park Board that
Kojetin Park is currently being advertised in the Sun Current to which the bid opening
will be held.on Tuesday, March 22 °d at 2:00 p.m.
C. Gymnasiums Proposal — Mr. Keprios handed out to the Park Board six different plans
of the construction that is going on at the South View gym and the Community Center
gym. He pointed out that they have had several meetings already with the "Community
Input Committee" which consists primarily of members from the Edina Basketball
Association, the Edina Girls Athletic Association as well as they have received some
input from the Edina Baseball Association. He noted that. the committee has contributed
a tremendous amount of quality input into the design. Mr. Keprios commented that the
project is moving along at a very fast pace.
D. Gold Medal Award — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that the "Gold Medal
Award" is the National Recreation Park Association's highest and most prestigious award
that is given out to municipal park and recreation departments in five different classes
based on population. He noted that Edina is considered a Class 4 community (under
50,000 population) and they have submitted a multi -page application form to which the
Park and Recreation staff had the opportunity to contribute to. Mr. Keprios stated that
Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications Director, was given all of the documents of
2
information and wrote the application to which she did a wonderful job. He noted that
during the week of April 19`h they would find out who the finalists are. Mr. Keprios
commented that he thinks Edina has a very good shot, however, he has heard that it is
almost unheard of for a community to win on its first try. It usually takes two to three
years of applying before receiving it.
Mr. Sorem asked what does it mean if they win the Gold Medal Award to which Mr.
Keprios replied it means Edina receives national recognition and puts us on the map. Mr.
Klus added that it's a really nice honor to the city and the staff for what they've done.
E. Senior Center Kitchen Project — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that the kitchen
project at the Senior Center is now complete. He noted that the Rotary Club contributed
almost $20,000 and the Masica family contributed $500.00 towards the project. Mr.
Keprios stated that it turned out beautiful. Ms. Presthus asked if the rates would change
for rentals to which Mr. Keprios replied it will stay the same but noted that it will now be
more attractive to renters.
F. Grandview Square Park Development — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that
they are on track with the development of the Grandview Square Park project. He noted
that the quote they received is around $40,000 to which they are a little shy of what has
been donated to date. However, that effort is still moving forward because they still need
to come up with the rest of the funds to make it work. Mr. Klus informed the Park Board
that there has been some miscommunication because the residents claim they were
promised a park by Ron Clark and not by the City. Mr. Klus commented that he doesn't
think the city should recommend or move ahead on something like this unless the money
has already been raised. He added that he doesn't think the city should be putting extra
money into the project without involvement from the people who live in that area. Mr.
Keprios pointed out that the city attorney has drawn up a contract that Ron Clark will
have to sign since they are going to serve as the general contractor and will use a lot of
their own sub - contractors. He noted that all of the dollars received so far that have been
deposited with the Edina Foundation have come from the Friends of the Library, the
Edina Senior Citizen Center Advisory Board, and a few people who live in the
Grandview Square condominiums. The city again paid for the architect fees; however,
we are not planning to contribute any additional dollars towards the project.
VI. PARK BOARD COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT PROJECTS
Mr. Klus indicated that at the last Park Board meeting Mr. Weiss suggested that the Park
Board maybe do something together in the community outside of the Park Board
meeting. Mr. Klus noted that he has asked Mr. Keprios to develop a list of potential
things the Park Board could discuss and possibly come to an agreement on what would
be good for them as a group to go out and do in the community. Mr. Keprios went
through the list he prepared.
Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that he met with Mr. MacHolda, Ms. Tilsner and
Ms. Miller to come up with a few ideas on different projects that the Park Board may be
3
interested in being involved with. He noted that one thought is to have the Park Board be
involved with the spring.clean up that is done every year by the maintenance staff that
takes place in early spring. He stated this is an opportunity where they really clean the
parks, boulevards and side street areas that otherwise do not get a lot of attention later in
the year. Another thought was to have the Park Board adopt a park that hasn't already
been adopted through the Adopt -A -Park program. Some other ideas they came up with
were some of the shelter buildings need painting from time to time. Also, this year the
Edina Conservation League is going to be heavily involved with the Arbor Day tree
planting project which possibly the Park Board could help out with. Mr. Keprios stated
that they could also do their own Needs Assessment Survey to which they could do a
mailing and invite people to come to their park on a Saturday or weekday evening and
ask them for their input as well as hand out a survey. This event could also be turned into
an ice cream social or something like that. Other thoughts were to have a buckthorn
abatement day or perhaps sponsor a special walk in the park day and meet your Park
Board members. Mr. Keprios stated that these were some of the ideas they came up with.
Mr. Weiss indicated that he thinks having a buckthorn abatement day would be a
wonderful thing to do because there is so much of it and if everyone brought along
another person they could get a lot done.
Mr. Johnson suggested that they hold one of their summer Park Board meetings at one of
the newer shelter buildings and post it so that neighbors can attend the meeting and give
them their input and share their concerns.
Mr. Sorem stated that he thinks it's a wonderful idea to have the Park Board go out into
the community and show them the commitment on our part. He noted that he's not sure
what project they should do but rather maybe do a couple of different projects a year.
Ms. Selleck commented that she thinks they are all good ideas and thinks it would be
really nice for the Park Board to get out into the community.
Mr. Fronek indicated that he thinks it's very important for the Park Board to get out and
meet people. He stated that if the city puts on some type of festival or something that
maybe the Park Board should be present at that. He noted that he thinks a lot of people
don't necessarily know that this avenue is available to them and commented that by them
being out in front of the people is the best way to go about accomplishing that goal.
Ms. Presthus noted that she brought this up to the Park Board a long time ago that she
would be in favor of having some sort of a neighborhood night out that the Park Board
would sponsor. Each Park Board member could be at a specific park. She commented
that she has already taken out enough of her own buckthorn that she isn't too excited
about chopping down more. Ms. Presthus stated that having a night out is something that
would be visible and would be sponsored all over the community.
Mr. Damman indicated that quite often he goes to the parks and gets input from the
residents. He stated that he would like for the Park Board to do something formal and
4
maybe hand out a survey to them while they are there. He noted that it doesn't have to be
on one certain day, however, they could do it in one day at the parks or they could do it
throughout the year.
Mr. Klus asked what events are held at the parks where the Park Board could volunteer.
He noted that there is the Fourth of July Fireworks as well as the Art Center has some
events but what do we do in the parks. Mr. Keprios replied that that there is the Iron Kids
Triathlon, the Fall Into Arts Festival at Centennial Lakes, the Summer Beach Party in the
middle of winter at Edinborough, the Parade of Boats, concerts throughout the summer at
the amphitheatre and Lighthouse Night where they do a little fireworks display at the
John Phillip Sousa's Band concert at Centennial Lakes. Ms. Presthus pointed out that
most of those events center around Centennial Lakes or the pool and commented that she
was thinking more of an ice cream social one night and open up 11 parks where each
Park Board member is at a park. Mr. Klus stated that he thinks it would be good if the
Park Board did something together where they are visible as a group at one thing whether
it be painting a park shelter that needs work or cleaning up a pathway or a walkway at a
park just so it's something that's visible that they can put PR out there to let people know
that this is what we are going to be doing and come and join us. Mr. Keprios stated that
they could take on an Arbor Day project by planting trees at a particular park.
Mr. Klus asked Mr. Keprios to put together a list of projects based on what was just
discussed and e-mail it to all Park Board members so everyone can rank them. At the
April meeting they will decide what it is that they want to do.
VII. COUNTRYSIDE PARK HOCKEY RINK
Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that in his staff report he stated there were 10
hockey rinks when actually there are 11 hockey rinks. Mr. Keprios handed out a report
that shows what the current use is for the hockey rinks as well as the general skating
areas. He commented that the average hours used versus the total numbers available
shows that the hockey rinks for the most part are used on Mondays, Tuesdays and
Thursdays. He noted that the hockey rinks are heavily booked on Tuesdays and
Thursdays; however, there are times available pretty much on even the heaviest days.
Mr. Keprios commented that they can't build enough hockey rinks or gymnasiums to
ever accommodate the Tuesday and Thursday night need because people will always
want more of the 6:00, 7:00 and 8:00 times. He pointed out that the problem is there is a
lot of time left over on the weekends. Mr. Keprios added that the rinks are not just there
for organized hockey but are also there for general skating. Mr. Johnson informed the
Park Board that the only times the mites get to play inside are on Saturday and Sunday
mornings.
Mr. Keprios stated that he thinks his staff report speaks for itself in that the dilemma they
are in: they need to make a wise decision about what to do with the hockey boards at
Countryside Park. He noted that he thinks it would be unwise to spend a lot of money to
put in new boards and lights in the wrong orientation over bad soils at Countryside Park.
He commented that Countryside Park could still be left open as a nice skating area as
well as a separate area for "shinny hockey ". Mr. Keprios noted that his recommendation
would be to put another hockey rink in at Lewis Park. Mr. Fronek noted that he sent out
a few a -mails regarding the situation and the responses were mostly from the under age
30 crowd and a lot depended on where they lived. He noted that he thinks a lot of people
feel that the ice at Countryside Park is bad and it is totally dependent on the weather. If
it's cold then the ice is good which makes Countryside Park an ideal location because it
has easy access. Mr. Fronek pointed out that access and parking is a big issue at Todd
Park, however, there is a new warming house there that probably should be getting a lot
more use. He indicated that he grew up close to Lewis Park, however, it does get overrun
with a lot of Bloomington residents. Therefore, if they put in a second rink at Lewis Park
does that mean it just opens it up for more Bloomington residents rather than providing a
neighborhood hockey rink for the people who live by Todd Park and Countryside Park.
Mr. Sorem stated that it's no secret that Edina probably has the best ice in Minnesota if
not the entire country for outdoor rinks and therefore Edina gets an incredible amount of
non - resident use. He commented that he doesn't know how they can stop it but his
theory is the more parks you can get hidden the better because the non - residents won't
know how to find them. Parks like Lewis and Countryside are right out in the open and
everyone knows where they are and they are easy access for people who are coming from
outside the city. Mr. Sorem indicated that he thinks a place like Todd Park is tough to get
to and that's a benefit to our community because the people in Edina are going to know
how to find, it. He added that there are a group of older guys who use the Lewis Park
hockey rink on Saturday mornings, they are all nice guys, however, he knows that not
one of them lives in Edina. He noted that they get there early, chew up the ice and it's
pretty much unusable for the rest of the day. Mr. Sorem noted that he thinks maybe they
should try to schedule the mites for Saturday mornings at the rinks that are out in the
open like Lewis and Creek Valley in an effort to try and keep the non - residents away. He
noted they should leave the parks open that are hard to find like Walnut Ridge and Todd
and by doing this maybe it would help. Mr. Sorem pointed out that he thinks having two
rinks at one location would be phenomenal and Lewis Park would be a great spot for it as
long as they are renting it out. He noted that he would hate to see non - residents use the
ice for an hour and chew it up and then go and do the same thing at the second rink.
Mr. Johnson indicated that he thinks they can kill two birds with one stone by putting in
an outdoor sheet of ice at Braemar between the golf dome and the south rink. He noted
that they could put in a.refrigeration system with a pole barn roof over it and it would be
sheltered by the hill. He added that there already is a Zamboni there and this way they
could have ice from approximately the middle of October to the end of March. He noted
that by doing this they would always have an extra sheet of ice even with the
unpredictable weather. Mr. Johnson stated that he thinks it should be primarily used for
the youth program. He commented that the mites are constantly looking for ice because
they get shut out at least four or five weekends a year. He noted that he would guarantee
that the Edina Hockey Association would come up with some funding for that. Mr.
Sorem asked if the city currently charges a rental fee to reserve an outdoor rink to which
Mr. Keprios. explained that the Hockey Association pays the same fee that the facility
M
users pay, which is $8.00 per participant per season. He added that it does get rented out
to other users at an hourly rental fee.
Mr. Klus asked if the neighborhood at Countryside Park would miss not having a
neighborhood rink to which Mr. Johnson replied that Creek Valley is not that far away
for them to use. Mr. Sorem commented that he's sure they would, however, there are
only a few houses that are there and he doesn't feel like it's truly a neighborhood park
like some of the others. Mr. MacHolda indicated that he agrees he doesn't really see
Countryside as a neighborhood and thinks the group that would miss it the most would be
the church and any high school programs. Ms. Presthus asked would all of the ice go or
just the hockey rink to which Mr. MacHolda replied it would just be the boards. Mr.
Sorem commented that the nice thing about Todd Park is there is already a nice facility
there as well as lights. Mr. Keprios stated that they have the money for one rink and they
can either put it at Lewis Park, Countryside Park or Todd Park.
Ms. Presthus asked Mr. Keprios what he thinks of an outdoor rink at Braemar versus an
indoor rink to which he replied that if they were to refrigerate an outside rink he thinks
they would still need to put up a roof and walls. Mr. Johnson stated that he thinks it
would only need a roof. Mr. Keprios indicated that he. needs to find out more about the
refrigeration system but he suspects it's pretty expensive. Mr. Sorem commented that he
thinks people would be surprised at how much use a rink like that would get. Mr.
Keprios noted that he would do a little analysis on this and crunch some numbers and at
least get some rough figures on it.
Mr. Damman asked when they do eventually revamp Countryside Park and put in a
parking lot would they be able to put the hockey rink back but into a better position? Mr.
Keprios replied that's a great question and at that point he would like to have a
neighborhood meeting, hire a professional architect and draw up some concept designs
with the neighborhood's input. He noted that some master plan ideas could include a
centrally located parking lot immediately adjacent to a new replacement park shelter
building with a new hockey rink in the proper orientation and reorient the west baseball
field. And there are probably a lot of ideas that we haven't even thought about yet.
Mr. Damman asked how would open skating be affected at Lewis Park if they just took it
away from them. Mr. Keprios replied that they could literally set aside and schedule
times that are designated for open skating only. Unfortunately, they do not have enough
real estate to put in a decent general skating area outside of the hockey boards and added
that they can't put one on the new athletic field because it would kill the grass. Mr.
Damman asked if there are normally a lot of people who use Lewis Park for general
skating to which Mr. Keprios replied it's a pretty small skating area and he doesn't
believe it gets a lot of use.
Ms. Selleck commented that she has frequented both Countryside Park and Todd Park
and feels that Countryside Park does have the little bit of a lack of community. She noted
that she does have some friends who live over there and they do use the skating rink.
7
Mr. Keprios stressed that as they debate the money that's available everyone needs to
understand that the money they are talking about is not capital improvement dollars
which carry over from year to .year. We are talking about operational dollars that do not
carry over to the following year. He explained that our own internal staff builds these
rinks and that is how they are able to get the job done at such a reasonable expense
otherwise they would cost close to $50,000 or more. Therefore, if they are going to do
something with that $25,000 they need to do it this year because they cannot bankroll that
money. Mr. Johnson asked if there is enough room and would it be possible to make the
parking lot bigger at Todd Park to which Mr. Keprios replied he thinks that could
physically be done. Mr. Keprios pointed out that the problem they are going to have is
facing the neighborhood. He noted that they would have to send out a mailing and have a
hearing because they can't just go down there and put in a parking lot. Mr. Keprios
commented that he thinks that is a good idea but the challenge is dealing with.
neighborhood opposition. Mr. Johnson noted that he would think the neighborhood
would want a bigger parking lot rather than having all of the cars park on the street. Mr.
Keprios replied that he was disappointed and surprised that some neighbors are strongly
opposed to a parking lot.
Mr. MacHolda indicated that he believes there is higher senior population by Todd Park
and that those people might not be looking for boards and a hockey rink, they wanted a
pathway, which they now have. Mr. Keprios stated that whatever we decide to do, we
should send notices first to inform people about what we are thinking about doing and
solicit their input.
Mr. Sorem commented that maybe the Edina Hockey Association could raise some
money for a second rink at Lewis Park and we can take the $25,000 we have now and put
in a hockey rink at Todd Park. He noted that Todd Park already has a nice warming
house and an attendant and that way we would then have 12 hockey rinks.
Todd Fronek MOVED TO RECOMMEND THAT A HOCKEY RINK BE PUT IN AT
TODD PARK. Jeff Sorem SECONDED THE MOTION.
Mr. Klus stated that the only thing he would like to see added to the motion is the caveat
that we publicize this however Mr. Keprios would deem necessary and allow the
neighbors to comment at the next Park Board meeting. He noted that this way it would
still give the staff plenty of time to build it this summer. Mr. Fronek replied that he is
okay with that caveat.
IN FAVOR — George Klus, Jeff Sorem, Todd Fronek, Jeff Johnson, Jessica Selleck,
Mike Weiss, Mike Damman.
OPPOSED — Linda Presthus.
MOTION CARRIED.
Mr. Weiss asked does that mean that we are not putting in a hockey rink at Countryside
Park, which Mr. Klus replied that is correct.
VIII. OTHER
A. Pathways — Mr. Keprios indicated that the pedestrian and bicycle pathways / trails was
on the list to put on future agenda items. He noted that there is no update at this point but
showed a master plan of where they currently are. Mr. Klus commented that they would
talk about the progress of this at a future Park Board meeting.
B. Tobacco Free Park Policy — Mr. Keprios handed out a newsletter from the Tobacco
Free Youth Recreation organization. Mr. Johnson commented that this is not being
followed at the arena and people are still smoking in front of the arena.
C. Skate Park - Mr. Keprios indicated that he heard there was a request for shade at the
skate park at the February Park Board meeting. He pointed out that he has found a
couple of vendors who have given him quotes on what it would cost to put in some shade
at the park. He noted that for an area of 40x60 the cost would be approximately $4,000
and our own staff could put it in the ground. Mr. Keprios stated that for $4,000 he thinks
that between the three cities and the YMCA they would be able to find that within their
operating budget. He noted that he doesn't think they would have to touch the money
that is currently being set aside for the concessions building.
D. Athletic Association Presidents - Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board they have
scheduled a meeting with the Presidents of the Athletic Association on Wednesday, April
13th at 6:00 p.m. in the Mayor's conference room. He added that the Park Board
members are more than welcome to attend. He stated that the agenda would cover
facilities, overlapping seasons and background checks. Mr. Klus asked Mr. Keprios to
send out an e -mail to the Park Board members with all of the information.
E. The Perfect Show — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that the Adaptive
Recreation Learning Exchange has put together a wonderful performance called "The
Perfect Show ". He noted that it's the same type of performance they did three years ago
called "Totally Talent and Tunes" to which they received a lot of recognition. He noted
that the performance will be held on March 12t at 3:00 pm and 7:00 pm at Richfield
High School and tickets cost $5.00. Mr. Keprios pointed out that the Edina Rotary Club
has been very supportive of this and have funded a good share of the expenses. Mr. Klus
commented that if you get a chance it's definitely worth going to. Susie Miller and the
other director from Richfield have done a great job putting it together. Mr. Keprios
stated that it's very heartwarming to see the people who have disabilities feel so proud of
themselves for their accomplishments and is very proud of Susie Miller for her passion
and efforts.
F. May - Ms. Selleck informed the Park Board that for "May Term" a few of her
friends have applied to do buckthorn abatement at Highlands Park. She noted that they
would find out whether or not they've been accepted on Friday.
0
G. Conservation League of Edina — A member in the audience, Paul Selcke, indicated to
the Park Board that the Conservation League of Edina would like to have an Arbor Day
event this year at Wooddale Park. He noted that the reason they chose Wooddale Park is
because it's one of the premiere parks in the City of Edina. He indicated that they would
like to plant some trees and possibly have a free tree distribution activity. Mr. Selcke
stated that this would be a great opportunity for the Park Board members to join them and
noted that it will be held on April 30`h. He pointed out that Mr. Keprios has already said
it's okay for them to plant the trees. Mr. Selcke explained that last year they held their
first Arbor Day event at Van Valkenburg Park and their hope is to go to a different park
each year. He noted that it's not just about planting trees in a park, it's also about trying
to get residents involved with planting trees.
Mr. Keprios commented that he has been very supportive of the Conservation League of
Edina's efforts and he is always supportive of programs that give the city more trees. He
noted that they would need to know what species they are planting as well as where
because the. law requires that Gopher One be called to mark locations of underground
utilities before any holes are dug. Mr. Keprios explained that they would need to be
.careful :that, it doesn't get too large because Wooddale is a small park and they may want
to think about going to Garden Park instead because the parking lot is much larger.
Mr. Selcke asked if the Park Department could update their website regarding Arbor Day
because the information is two years old. Mr. Keprios stated that he would look into it.
IX. ADJOURNMENT
Linda Presthus MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 8:45 P.M. Mike Damman
SECONDED THE MOTION. MEETING ADJOURNED.
10
1r
MINUTES OF THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE
EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD
TUESDAY, MARCH 8, 2005, AT 7:00 P.M.
EDINA CITY HALL — MAYOR'S CONFERENCE ROOM
4801 WEST 50T" STREET
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Gary Nyberg, Bill Crawford, Peggy Jennings,
Marie Thorpe, Lou Blemaster, and Karen Ferrara
MEMBERS ABSENT: Vice Chairman Bob Kojetin, David Runyan and Ian Yue
STAFF PRESENT: Joyce Repya, Associate Planner
OTHERS PRESENT: Robert Vogel, Heritage Preservation Consultant
Chairman Nyberg opened the meeting with words of welcome and introductions
for Lou Blemaster and Karen Ferrara, new members joining the Board.
Additionally, he announced that not in attendance are David Runyan
representing the Planning Commission and Ian Yue a student member.
I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES:
Member Jennings moved for approval of the minutes from the February 8, 2005
meeting. Member Crawford seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion
carried.
II. 2004 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
Planner Repya referred to the 2004 Annual Report submitted to the Minnesota
State Historical Society as a requirement for being a Certified Local Government.
The report identifies the heritage landmark designated properties and highlights
the Board activities for the year. She pointed out that a majority of the Board's
time was spent reviewing Certificates of Appropriateness for detached garages
in the Country Club District.
Board members agreed that after reviewing 11 plans for garages it has been
helpful to compare size and heights of the structures to gain perspective on the
type of accessory structures that meet the modern needs of homeowners as well
as what new construction is appropriate to impose in the historic district.
Minutes — March 8, 2005
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
Member Jennings stated that she finds the statistic sheet comparing the square
footage, heights and roof pitches of all the garages addressed thus far to be
most helpful. She added that the additional guidelines provided for the detached
garages should be a useful tool for those proposing new garages as well as for
the Board when reviewing the proposals.
Board members agreed that 2004 was a very busy, productive year. All
indicated that they looked forward to continuing the advancement of Edina's
heritage preservation efforts. No formal action was taken.
III. 2005 GOALS & OBJECTIVES:
Consultant Vogel provided the following list of suggested goals and objectives to
consider for the coming year:
1. Carry out reconnaissance survey of the Minnehaha Creek corridor to
identify historic structures and landscapes worthy of preservation.
2. Nominate a minimum of two properties for designation as Edina Heritage
Landmarks. r
3. Prepare a draft comprehensive historic preservation plan for adoption by
the City Council in 2006.
4. Increase efforts to provide city officials with information, education, and
training in historic preservation.
5. Apply for inclusion in the Preserve America Program.
6. Work with the City Engineer and other city departments to ensure that
historic properties are taken into account in planning for public works
improvements.
Mr. Vogel pointed out that it is not uncommon for Board's to "bite off more than they
can chew ", and it is important to be realistic relative to amount of work staff can
accomplish in a given year. He added that the items listed have been identified in
the Historic Context Study and should fit in well with reviewing the Certificates of
Appropriateness applications from the Country Club District.
Board members discussed the goals and agreed that next year when reviewing the
year's activities, the list will be helpful. Mr. Vogel pointed out that in keeping with the
comprehensive historic preservation plan they are working on, it is a good idea for
the Board to get into the habit of establishing outcome or performance based
activities.
Member Crawford then moved to adopt the 2005 goals and objectives provided by
Consultant Vogel. Member Jennings seconded the motion. All voted aye. The
motion carried.
FA
/f
Minutes — March 8, 2005
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
IV. ELECTION OF OFFICERS:
Member Jennings moved to nominate Gary Nyberg to continue serving as Chairman
and Bob Kojetin as Vice Chairman of the Board. Member Crawford seconded the
motion. Chairman Nyberg stated that he would be happy to continue serving as
chairman. Planner Repya explained that although Member Kojetin is not in
attendance, she had asked him if he would be willing to continue serving the Board
in a leadership position if nominated, and he indicated he would. All voted aye. The
motion carried.
V. OTHER BUSINESS:
A. Edina Heritage Award
Planner Repya presented the press release inviting nominations for the 2005
Edina Heritage Award. She indicated that the notice will appear in the Edina Sun
Current, Edina Chamber of Commerce, Edina Magazine, EpiCenter Business
Journal, Edina Resource Center and Edina Public Schools publications. Board
members agreed that they are hopeful to receive several nominations from which to
choose. The deadline for applications is April 15th. Chairman Nyberg, Member
Jennings and Member Kojetin had agreed to meet on April 18th to review the
applications and make a recommendation for the recipient. No further action was
taken.
B. Edina Theater Sign
Planner Repya reminded the Board that she and Mr. Vogel had met with
Gene Haugland, owner of the theater and discussed the possibility of pursuing
heritage landmark designation for the theater sign. Mr. Haugland indicated that he
would be interested in pursuing the designation and asked staff to put together a
proposed plan of treatment for him to review.
Chairman Nyberg asked if the marquee is included when talking about the
theater sign. Discussion ensued regarding whether the marquee should be
included. Mr. Nyberg pointed out that the marquee helps to identify the theater sign
and gives it purpose. He stated that he would like the marquee to be included in the
designation — Board members agreed.
Consultant Vogel explained that a landmark designation takes at least two
months on the short side, but more likely three months to go from beginning to end.
Once the Heritage Preservation Board has approved the nomination study, it is sent
on to the Minnesota State Historical Society who has 60 days to submit their
comments. Keeping the time schedule in mind, the nomination study could be
3
Minutes — March 8, 2005
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
ready for the next meeting in April, and it would, be realistic to consider taking the
landmark designation to the City Council in June or July
C. Hennepin County Historical Society Membership
Consultant Vogel reminded the Board that at least one member of the
Heritage Preservation Board must serve on the Hennepin County Historical Society.
Chairman Nyberg advised Mr. Vogel that he is a member of the County's Historical.
Society.
D. Morningside Centennial Event
Planner Repya announced that the Morningside Centennial Planning
Committee has organized an event in which Barbara Bezat of the Northwest
Architectural Archives at the University of Minnesota will teach a class entitled "How
to Research the History of Your House ". The class will take place on Saturday,
March 12th from 10 to 11:30 a.m. at the Edina - Morningside Community Church,
4201 Morningside Road. The class is open to all for a $5.00 fee per person.
VI. . NEXT MEETING DATE: April 12,2005
VII. ADJOURNMENT: 8:00 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Joyce Repya .
4
April 8, 2005
Council members,
I am writing to voice my disappointment at the declining of a variance request for lot
coverage by Brad and Amy Spartz on April 7, 2005. Brad and Amy have a handicapped
child and are hoping to renovate a home on Concord Terrace to accommodate handicap
accessibility. They found the perfect home near Concord Elementary School and quickly
earned the approval of all of their neighbors for their planned renovation. Because of an
error on the original listing documents, the lot size was misstated as being slightly larger
than it actually is. Consequently they needed to request a small variance to the lot
coverage requirements, in addition to two other variances, which I understand were not
opposed.
I live in the Country Club neighborhood. Anyone who has listened to Brad and Amy's
story has had a hard time understanding how lot coverage variances are routinely granted
in the Country Club neighborhood (for no apparent hardship) while a request for a very
small variance, for a great reason, supported by the neighborhood, gets declined.
Brad is an Edina native and his parents are long -time Edina residents. Brad grew up in
the Country Club neighborhood and is looking forward to finding a home in our
community that he can afford and can accommodate his handicapped son.
As a community, I feel it is important that we embrace diversity. City codes are written
to accommodate an average home. A handicapped accessible home needs to be 10 -20%
larger than an average home to accommodate larger doorframes, roll -in showers,
elevators, and other needed features for the handicapped. City code should reflect this
reality, and the variance board should recognize these special needs when making their
decisions.
Sincerely,
Dan Kraft
4607 Bruce Ave
Edina, MN 55424
952- 922 -5563
Sidney B. Rebers
6916 Dakota Trail
Edina, Minnesota 55349
952- 941 -4355
April 15, 2005
James B. Hovland, Mayor
Scot A. Housh
Alice Hulbert
Linda Masica
Ann Swenson
4801 West 501' Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Re: Meeting on April 5, 2005 via television
Dear City Council Members:
I watched the council meeting discussing the Wallingford development with interest on
April 5'. At that meeting, Mr. Vasco Bernardi stated that in an effort to keep the initial costs
down, they would not be using Andersen or Pella windows.
I was a general contractor for 39 years. In recent years, there have been many claims for
rotting and leaking windows and related mold issues due to moisture. In my opinion, Andersen
are the most trouble free windows, and Pella are the second most trouble free windows.
I congratulate the Council and the Mayor for not approving Mr. Bernardi's revision to
what had been approved.
Sincerely,
i e . Rebers
Rebers Construction Company
o
DJI(iES) T_&
March 2005
A digest of actions taken by the Metropolitan Council, Metropolitan Airports Commission, Metropolitan Parks & Open Space
Commission and Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission. Minutes of all Council and Commission meetings are filed with
the Legislative Reference Library, 645 State Office Building, 6th Floor, in St. Paul for a period of up to two years and can be
viewed by the public. Call the appropriate commission or operations area for meeting information and/or specific questions.
Metropolitan Council
The Metropolitan Council is located at Mears Park Centre, 230 E. Fifth St., St. Paul, MN, 55101. For further information
regarding the contents of this publication, contact Pat Curtiss at (651) 602 -1390. The Council's general number is (651) 602-
1000, TDD: (651) 291 -0904. Recent Council publications can be found at major public libraries in the Metro Area.
Publications can be ordered by e-mail. The address is: data. center @metc.state.mn.us Comments can be made to that address as
well as (651) 602 -1500, the Metro Council Public Comment Line. Check the internet web site at hup.11www.metrocouncil org.
The Council...
Community Development
• Amended its prior approval of 15 units of
project based rental assistance for Brandes
Place in Fridley to 16 units.
• Approved the Empire Wetlands Area
Regional Park acquisition master plan
(Referral No. 19362 -1).
• Encouraged Dakota County to continue to
coordinate trail planning and other issues
that affect the Empire WasteWater
Treatment Plant with the Metropolitan
Council Environmental Services staff.
• Encouraged Dakota County to continue to
be involved with Empire Township and
others in the environmental review and
permitting of the proposed expansion of
mining to the west of the proposed park.
Their efforts should ensure that the surface
and ground water resources of the park and
the Vermillion River are protected. They
should also ensure that there is an
appropriate buffer between the park and the
mining activity area located to the west of
the park.
March 2005
Adopted the Guidelines and following
implementation criteria for the Planning
Assistance Fund:
1. That priority is given to applications for
work involving comprehensive plan
updates or elements of comprehensive
plan updates required by the 2005
System Statements.
2. That the loan be a maximum of $40,000,
for.a two -year term, with the
requirement for a 25% local match of
funds or in kind services.
3. That favorable consideration be given to
applicants that are implementing their
2020 plan updates, adhering to
conditions place by the Council on their
2020 updates, or conditions placed on
review of subsequent comprehensive
amendments.
• Allowed the City of Andover to put comp
plan amendment, Sewer Staging Plan
Update, Review File 18158 -22, into effect
with no plan modification.
• Adopted the following recommendations
relating to the SE Scott County — Elko/New
Market, New Market Township
Comprehensive Plan Update, Review File
19360:
a) allowed the cities of Elko and New
Market and Scott County to place the
Plan into effect.
DlEiES i '
JL.i.
b) classified the cities of Elko and New
• Authorized the transfer of $511,000 from
Market as Rural Growth Centers as
'the Transit Capital Fund to the
provided for in the 2030 Regional
Environmental Services Capital Fund.
Development Framework.
c) added Credit River, North Cannon and
• Amended the 2005 Unified Operating
Sand Creek to the Shared Goal #13 that
Budget as follows:
would incorporate greenways along
Adopted Revised
these waterways.
2005 2005
Budget Budget
d) required the Cities to require
Revenues
infiltration measures for future
Operating $ 431,906,623 $ 432,341,112
developments to aid in reductions of
Pass Through 77,634,819 77,717,611
peak flow, volume, and temperature
Debt Service 117,869,800 117,869,800
from new sources of runoff.
Total $ 627,411,242 $ 627,928,523
• Identified the provision of wastewater to the
Expenditures
Woodcrest/Ptarmigan Heights area of the
Operating $ 429,882,003 $ 430,642,933
City of Elko as a priority.
Pass Through 76,610,519 79,422,497
Debt Service 122,163,712 122,198,712
Total $:628,656,234 $ 632,264,142
Environment
Balance/Deficit $ (1,M,992) $ (4,335,619)
• Authorized the Regional Administrator to
negotiate and execute a Cooperative
• Authorized the Chief Financial Officer and
Construction Agreement with the State of
her designee(s) to proceed with the public
Minnesota Department of Transportation
sale of:
(MnDOT) for relocation of a part of the Elm
1. General Obligation Wastewater
Creek Interceptor in Maple Grove and a
Revenue and Refunding Bonds, Series
portion of the Dayton -Hassan extension
2005B, Resolution 2005 -05
with MnDOT's CSAH 81 and TH 610
2. General Obligation Transit and
improvements. MCES Project 900450
Refunding Bonds, Series 2005C,
Resolution 2005 -06 and
• Authorized the General Manager of
3. General Obligation Parks Bonds, Series
Environmental Services to hold a public
2005D, Resolution 2005 -07
hearing for the Draft Facility Plan for the St.
Paul Lift Station L -12 Improvements,
• Approved the following committee
MCES Project 8022.
assignments recommended by the Chair
Pursuant to Council Bylaws, Article III.I:
Management
Transportation: M. H. Smith - Chair,
• Amended the 2005 Authorized Capital
Aguilar, Georgacas, Hilker, Leppik,
Program (multi -year authorization) by
McDaniel, Steffen, Meeks, Susag, Wolter
adding authority as follows:
Community Development: Georgacas -
- Metro Transportation Services Bus $ 1,628,822
Chair, Aguilar, Kinkie, Fawcett, McDaniel,
- Metro Transit Bus 783,925
Meeks, Pistilli, Steffen
Total $ 2,412.747
Environment: Leppik - Chair, Hilker,
• Amended the 2005 Capital Budget by
Scherer, J. Smith, Susag, Wittsack, Wolter .
adding annual budget appropriations as
Management: Scherer - Chair, Fawcett,.
follows:
Krinkie, Pistilli, J. Smith, M.H. Smith,
- Metro Transportation Services Bus $ 1,222,729
Wittsack
- Metro Transit Bus 783,925
Total $ 2,006,654
March 2005
M I 'T
Dl(iESv
• Appointed the following members to serve
as the Metropolitan Parks and Open Space
Commission (MPOSC) Appointments
Committee: Peggy Leppik (chair), Natalie
Steffen, and Dan Wolter.
Authorized the Regional Administrator to
issue purchase orders to Hawkins Inc. to
purchase Chlorine (Bulk Liquid and 1 -Ton
Cylinders), Sodium Hydroxide, Sodium
Hypochlorite, Sodium Bisulfite, and Nitric
Acid.
Authorized the Regional Administrator: 1)
to issue a purchase order to Polydyne
Incorporated to provide Clarifloc CE -600
Polymer to the Blue Lake Plant at a unit
price of $0.82 per pound, and 2) to negotiate
and execute appropriate documents to
release the apparent low bidder, Nalco
Company, from any obligations under its
bid for its polymer product, for the amount
of its bid bond.
Increased the delegated construction change
order authority of its Regional
Administrator from $50,000 to $338,994 for
the Asbestos Removal — 390 North Robert
Street building, Metropolitan Council
Project No. 04P134
Adopted Resolutions 2005 -08, 2005 -09 and
2005 -10 authorizing the Chief Financial
Officer and her designee(s) to proceed with
the public sale on March 30, 2005 of:
1. $99,935,000 in General Obligation
Wastewater Revenue and Refunding
Bonds, Series 2005B, (Resolution
2005 -08)
2. $45,685,000 in General Obligation
Transit and Refunding Bonds, Series
2005C, (Resolution 2005 -09) and
3. $6,000,000 in General Obligation Parks
Bonds, Series 2005D (Resolution 2005-
10)
and, authorized the Regional Administrator
and Chief Financial Officer, in consultation
March 2005
with the Chair and Treasurer of the Council
to award bid on the sale of the bonds in
accordance with the terms and conditions as
shown in the resolution.
Transportation
Authorized the Regional Administrator to
initiate a contract for the operation of
regular route and paratransit bus service in
the East Metro area from June 5, 2005, to
May 31, 2010, in an amount not to exceed
$3,780,756.
Authorized the Regional Administrator to
initiate a contract for the operation of
regular route transit service in the West
Metro area from May 21, 2005, to May 31,
2010, in an amount not to exceed
$6,109,964.
• Authorized the Regional Administrator to
initiate a contract for the operation of
regular route transit service in the Hopkins
area from May 7, 2005, to May 31, 2010, in
an amount not to exceed $3,107,849.
Authorized the Regional Administrator to
negotiate and execute an interagency
agreement and lease with the City of St.
Paul for design, construction and operation
of the Smith Avenue Transit Center.
Authorized the Regional Administrator to
negotiate and execute a contract with Scott
County in the amount of $250,000 for the
operation of Americans with Disabilities
Act (ADA) paratransit services within Scott
County for the remaining months of
calendar year 2005.
• Concurred with the Transportation Advisory
Board's action (pending) to amend the 2004-
2006 TIP by adding SP# 70- 621 -22, Scott
Co. CSAH 21 from CSAH 18 to CSAH 42,
Right of Way Acquisition.
Authorized the Regional Administrator to
negotiate and execute a contract amendment
with URS Corporation, the Hiawatha LRT
Project Management Consultant (PMC), to
adjust the amended contract total from
$21.15 million to an amount not to exceed
$21.55 million and extend the term six
months to December 31, 2005.
• Approved a package of potential fare and
service adjustments, that is to be presented
at public hearings for the purpose of public
comment and input prior to adoption of any
required adjustments.
DlEiEST,.
New Publications
Council publications are available from the Council's
Regional Data, Center. For a free and complete list
of publications, write the Metropolitan Council Data
Center, 230 E. Fifth St., St. Paul, MN 55.101, or call
(651) 602 -1140.
E -mail address is: data. center @metc.state.mn.us
There is a charge for some publications.
The bimonthly Council Directions newsletter
provides information on regional issues and Council
Programs. If you wish to subscribe to Council
Directions at no charge, call Dawn Hoffner at (651)
602 -1447.
Metropolitan Commission Activities
Metropolitan Airports Commission
Metropolitan Airports Commission offices are located at
6040 28th Av. S., Minneapolis, MN 55450. For more
information, call Lynn Sorensen at (612) 726 -8186.
The Commission:
• Approved a public parking rate adjustment
for the General Parking Lots of the
Lindbergh and Humphrey Terminal
Buildings.
• Authorized staff to enter into negotiations
with the Anoka County - Blaine Airport
Development Partners with regard to a lease
arrangement for development at Anoka
County - Blaine Airport.
Received the following awards: 2005 Seven
Wonders of Engineering Award, National
Award for Excellence in Concrete
Pavement, Minnesota Concrete and
Masonry Contractors Association 2005
Honor Award for Outstanding Usage of
Poured -in -Place Concrete, Mn/DOT
Concrete Paving Association of Minnesota
March 2005
Merit Award and the 27th Annual
Minnesota Public Relations Society of
America Classics Award.
Metropolitan Parks & Open Space
Commission (MP &OSC)
Metropolitan Parks & Open Space Commission offices are
located at Mears Park Centre, 230 E. Fifth St., St. Paul,
55101. For more information, call Sandi Dingle at (651)
602 -1312.
The Commission:
• Recommended that the Metropolitan
Council authorize a grant of $950,000 of
acquisition opportunity funds to Anoka
County to acquire the 115 -acre property in
Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve.
Recommended that the Metropolitan
Council authorize a grant of $348,231 to
partially finance the acquisition of a 1 -acre
parcel (8200 E. Bush Lake Road) for
Hyland- Bush - Anderson Lakes Park Reserve
and to allow the remaining costs to acquire
the parcel (up to $522,347) be eligible for
reimbursement consideration in a future
i •'
D I C!i EES-)
regional parks capital improvement people of the Metropolitan Area as
program. required under MN Statute 473.147
and does not meet the applicable
• Recommended the following language for land acquisition funding policy
inclusion in the 2006 -2011 regional parks conditions of the Regional
CIP policy: Recreation Open Space Policy Plan.
C. That the acquisition opportunity
1. That the 2006 -2011 regional parks CEP grant finance up to 40% of the
funding request consist of $7 million appraised market value /negotiated
per year of Metropolitan Council bonds purchase price of the land, property
proposed to match $10.5 million per tax equivalency payment, relocation
year of State funds. Since the CIP is costs borne by the park agency as
divided into a two -year biennium, the required by law, and appraisal and
biennial amount recommended is $14 legal costs borne by the park
million of Council bonds and $21 agency. Reductions in the final
million of State funds. Furthermore, purchase due to a partial donation
non -State and non -Metro. Council bond by the seller shall count as part of
funds such as TEA -21 grants should be the 60% match to the total costs.
included in the CIP. D. That a park agency is limited in
2. A portion of the Council bonds (up to receiving no more than $1 million
33 %) may be issued for 10 years and the total from the acquisition
remainder issued for 5 years to stay opportunity fund per biennial period
within the Council's property tax (July 1 of odd numbered year to
constraint on bond debt service. The June 30 of next odd numbered
10 -year bonds may only be used for year)•
land acquisition. No more than $7 E. That any money remaining in the
million will be issued per year. fund 45 days prior to the end of the
3. That the park land acquisition biennial period be granted to park
opportunity fund be financed with agencies in proportion to the
unmatched Council bonds from the amount of Council approved
parks CIP up to the limit set per year by outstanding acquisition
the Council to stay within its property reimbursement debt at that time.
tax constraints on Council bond debt.
4. The following conditions should be • That park agencies be permitted to submit
applied for awarding land acquisition funding requests that total the biennial
opportunity grants: allocation amount shown in Table 3, with
A. That an agency must use up its the amount for unfunded 2004 -05 CIP
existing land acquisition grants projects adjusted based on what the 2005
before it can apply for an Legislature appropriates.
acquisition opportunity grant.
B. That the acquisition proposed is Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission
consistent with a Council approved (MSFC)
master plan, but that the Council
retains the right to deny a grant if it Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission offices are
located at 900 South 5th St., Minneapolis, MN 55415. For
finds that the acquisition would not more information, call Nancy Matowitz at (612) 335 -3310.
be needed to reasonably meet the
outdoor recreation needs of the The Commission: No Report this month.
March 2005
705
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 273
Regular Meeting, April 18, 2005
Room 349, Edina Community Center
AGENDA
Determination of Quorum and Call to Order
Approval of Minutes of Meeting of March 21, 2005
HEARINGS OF INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS, AND PRESENTATION OF PETITIONS FROM
THE PUBLIC REGARDING ITEMS BEFORE THE BOARD FOR ACTION OR ON ANY OTHER
ISSUE ( *SEE ATTACHED DETAIL.)
PRESENTATIONS
➢ Wive Les Beaux Arts!" — Normandale Elementary School Teachers Evelyn Emerson,
Music; Marie Moilanen, Physical Education; and Jill Bisping, Art; and 4th and 5th Grade
Students
➢ "Every Kid Needs the Arts" — Diana Leland, Teaching & Learning Specialist/Art, Music,
& Theatre; and Teachers Kay Wagner, Art; Bill Webb, Instrumental Music; and Tony
Matthes, Theatre Arts
REPORT
➢ CBOC — Peyton Robb, Board of Education
ACTION
408 Personnel Recommendations
409 Termination /Nonrenewal Recommendations
410 Structural Balance
411 Master Agreement — Independent School District 273 and the School
Service Employees Union Local 284, appended
412 Community Education Services Fund (04) Budget for 2005 -2006
413 2004 -2005 General Fund (01) Budget Adjustments, appended
414 2004 -2005 Transportation Fund (03) Budget Adjustments
415 2004 -2005 Capital Fund (05) Budget Adjustments
416 Purchase of Buses
417 Revised Policy 1600 — Community Relations: Relations Between
Nonpublic and Other Educational Organizations and the-Schools
418 Revised Policy 1610.620 — Community Relations: Relations with
Parochial /Private Schools
419 Revised Policy 2000.1 — Administration: Equal Opportunity
420 Revised Policy 2000.2 — Administration: Commitment to Diversity
421 Revised Policy 5139 — Students: Hazing Prohibition
706 -708
709
710 -714
715
716 -717
718
719 -721
722 -725
726
727 -728
729 -731
732 -734
735 -736
737 -740
422
Revised Policy 6200 — Instruction: Community Education Services
741 -742
429
Statement of Mission
754
423
Revised Policy 6210 — Instruction: Community Education Services
743 -744
424
Revised Policy 6216 — Instruction: Community Education Financial
745 -746
432
Support
757
425
Revised Policy 7430 — New Construction: Change Orders
747 -748
426
Deleted Policy 6216.1 — Instruction: Fees for Community Education
749 -750
427
New Policy 3519 - Non - Instructional Operations: Turf
751 -752
436
Management Plan
761
CONSENT
428
Community Education Services Personnel Recommendations
753
429
Gift from Linda and Daniel Olson
754
430
Gift from Dianne Blake
755
431
Gift from Perry Larson
756
432
Gift from Dr. Michael Burke
757
433
Gift from Target
758
434
Gift from Normandale Elementary PTO
759
435
Gift from Edina High School Parent Council
760
436
Gift from Edina Vocal Music Booster Club
761
437
Gift from International Dairy Queen
762
438
Gift from Darcy Dahnert
763
439
Gift from Target
764
DISCUSSION
440
2006 -2007 Early Childhood Through Grade 12 School Calendar
765 -767
441
Board of Education Meeting Dates for 2005 -2006
768
442
Proposed 2005 -2006 Capital Fund (05) Budget
769 -770
INFORMATION
443
Expenditures Payable on March 28, 2005, appended
771
444
Expenditures Payable on April 11, 2005, appended
772
445
Bond Fund Expenditures Payable on March 31, 2005
773
446
Bond Fund Expenditures Payable on April 14, 2005
774
447
Enrollment as of March 25, 2005
775
448
New Procedure 3519 — Non - Instructional Operations: Turf
776 -778
Management Plan
449
Recognition of Staff
779
Adjournment
*Persons who wish to address the Board are requested to complete and submit an appropriate form to the
Board Secretary prior to the designated hearing time. When recognized, each individual shall identify
himself /herself and the group represented, if any. He /She shall then state the reason for addressing the
Board and shall be limited in time at the discretion of the Board Chair. Individual employees of the School
District or representatives of employee organizations shall have utilized administrative procedures before
making a request to address the Board.
Page 1 of 2
Subject: Sun Current Article 4/14/2005
ne"Papeam
Neighborhood association will ask city leaders to
halt gymnasium project
By James, Zwilling
Sun Newspapers'
(Created 4/14/2005 9:04:42 AM)
Members of the Edina Community Center Neighborhood Association (ECCNA) are preparing for the
final round with the city Tuesday, April 19, over a proposed gymnasium project. Neighborhood .
association leaders have been critical of two proposed gyms at the Edina Community Center campus
and will ask the City Council on Tuesday to derail the $5 million project.
The council has been misled about the neighbors' feelings about the gyms, the safety concerns of
residents have not been addressed and the proposed location of the gyms is not designed for
commercial use, said Maria Fesenmaier, president of the ECCNA. She and her neighbors have
requested to be placed on the agenda at Tuesday's meeting to discuss their concerns.
Fesenmaier said the neighborhood supports additional gymnasiums in Edina, but will not support the
proposed construction at the Community Center campus. We've said all along that we support more
gyms," she said. "But they don't belong here. This is about safety, safety, safety."
Fesenmaier said the joint committee of city and school district leaders that worked on the proposal has
not addressed the neighborhood's concerns about traffic safety. A traffic study undertaken by the
developers has traffic volumes that come up hundreds of cars short, she said. Those claims will be
part of the neighborhood association's presentation Tuesday, and Fesenmaier said she is more than
confident that.her group's numbers will ring true. "We want to address this problem now, not after the
gyms are already built," she said.
The ECCNA claims the traffic study completed by the Howard R. Green Co. does not include alliour
gyms that would exist at the campus or the additional construction already taking place, including a
n ew performing arts facility, at the site. The Edina Transportation Commission echoed #hose concerns
last month when it unanimously agreed that the transportation report was insufflciert.:An addendum to
the'transportation study Was .for warded to city staff by Steve Ma nhart from the Howard R. Green Co.
after the commission's rejection of the report, but Fesenmaier said the study remains`insufficient even
with the addendum. The current construction at the ECC campus, which includes additions at
Normandale Elementary School and South View Middle schools, will not produce or attract additional
trips, according to the addendum.
"Traffic safety is the biggest issue," Fesenmaier said. "The city needs to quit making this about
parking. It's not about parking. It's safety." Dan Rectenwald, another neighbor who has expressed
opposition to the gyms at the ECC site, had the opportunity to participate in planning for the gyms. His
participation was lauded earlier this month by Councilmember Scot Housh who told fellow council
members that he believed the neighborhood's concerns had been met. Rectenwald said his
participation in the gym project does not mean the plan has earned his support. "I have participated in
the process, but our neighborhood's concern for safety has not been met," he said. "In general, the
ECCNA still feels that traffic and safety on the streets have been treated in a half- hearted manner. It is
Page 2 of 2
clear that our city's priority is to create a mega - tournament complex, not simply add gyms to the city's
inventory or, most importantly, advocate public safety."
While the proposed facilities would allow for some tournament play, gym proposals calling for more
space have been floating around the city for more than a decade. Linda Presthus, a member of the
Edina Parks Board, has been working toward creating additional gym space in Edina for about 15
years, she estimated. Presthus, a former president of the Edina Boys' Basketball Association, became
involved when her sons were athletes. She has continued the fight for gyms because she has watched
as the sports utilizing gyms grew in popularity while their space remained unchanged. "I think that the
city leaders and most residents have supported gyms all along," she said. "Unfortunately, for many
reasons we haven't been able to get them built."
Gyms were part of a citywide referendum that failed May 16, 2001. A special election was held for a
$35.8 million city referendum that proposed a 20 -year bond that would have funded improvements at
27 city parks and other city-owned facilities, as well as additions and upgrades to gymnasiums,
swimming pools, playing fields and theaters at Edina Public Schools. Presthus said it has long been
her opinion — and that of many others in the community — that new gyms need to be a part of school
facilities. That's why she supports the proposed gyms for the ECC campus. "The only solution that
ever really made sense was putting gyms at the school sites," she said. "This is the best opportunity
we have in Edina for new gyms."
The ECCNA disagrees. Association members say Braemar Park would be the best alternative for city
gyms, and will again make that case at next week's City Council meeting. The ECCNA expects that
they could be facing off against the athletic associations at the meeting — something they have
become accustomed to doing — but Fesenmaier said they are prepared.
The ECCNA could benefit from the absence of Housh as well. He has been the council's most
outspoken supporter of the gyms, but is expected to be absent from the meeting.
Presthus said she feels like the gym proposal will move forward, but she added that she won't start
celebrating early. "I've been at this too long to start celebrating early," she said.
The City Council will meet at 7 p.m. Tuesday at City Hall, 4801 W. 50th St.
Page 1 of 2
Subject: Sun Current Article 4/14/2005
viewspapFws
Neighborhood association will ask city leaders to
halt gymnasium project
By James Zwilling
Sun`'Newspapers
(Created 4/14/2005 9:04:42 AM)
Members of the Edina Community Center Neighborhood Association (ECCNA) are preparing for the
final .round with the city Tuesday, April 19, over a proposed gymnasium project. Neighborhood
association leaders have been critical of two proposed gyms at the Edina Community Center campus
and will ask the City Council on Tuesday to derail the $5 million project.
The council has been misled about the neighbors' feelings about the gyms, the safety concerns of
residents have not been addressed and the proposed location of the gyms is not designed for
commercial use, said Maria Fesenmaier, president of the ECCNA. She and her neighbors have
requested to be placed on the agenda at Tuesday's meeting to discuss their concerns.
Fesenmaier said the neighborhood supports additional gymnasiums in Edina, but will not support the
proposed construction at the Community Center campus. We've said all along that we support more
gyms," she said. "But they don't belong here. This is about safety, safety, safety."
Fesenmaier said the joint committee of city and school district leaders that worked on the proposal has
not addressed the neighborhood's concerns about traffic safety. A traffic study undertaken by the
developers has traffic volumes that come up hundreds of cars short, she said. Those claims will be
part of ihe.neighborhood association's presentation Tuesday, and Fesenmaier said she is more than
confident that her group's numbers will ring true. "We want to address this problem now, not after the
gyms are already built," she said.
The ECCNA claims the traffic study completed by the Howard R. Green Co. does not include all four
gyms that would exist at the campus or the additional construction already taking place, including a
new performing.,arts facility, at the site. The Edina Transportation Corn mission: echoed those concerns
last month when it unanimously agreed that the transportation report was insufficient. An addendum to
the transportation study was forwarded to city staff by Steve Manhart from the Howard R. Green Co.
after the commission's rejection of the report, but Fesenmaier said the study remains insufficient even
with the addendum. The current construction at the ECC campus, which includes additions at
Normandale Elementary Scliool and South View Middle schools, will not produce or attract additional
trips, according to the addendum.
"Traffic safety is the biggest issue," Fesenmaier said. "The city needs to quit making this about
parking. It's not about parking. It's safety." Dan Rectenwald, another neighbor who has expressed
opposition to the gyms at the ECC site, had the opportunity to participate in planning for the gyms. His
participation was lauded earlier this month by Councilmember Scot Housh who told fellow council
members that he believed the neighborhood's concerns had been met. Rectenwald said his
participation in the gym project does not mean the plan has earned his support. "I have participated in
the process, but our neighborhood's concern for safety has not been met," he said. "In general, the
ECCNA still feels that traffic and safety on the streets have been treated in a half - hearted manner. It is
Page 2 of 2
clear that our city's priority is to create a mega- tournament complex, not simply add gyms to the city's
inventory or, most importantly, advocate public safety."
While the proposed facilities would allow for some tournament play, gym proposals calling for more
space have been floating around the city for more than a decade. Linda Presthus, a member of the
Edina Parks Board, has been working toward creating additional gym space in Edina for about 15
years, she estimated. Presthus, a former president of the Edina Boys' Basketball Association, became
involved when her sons were athletes. She has continued the fight for gyms because she has watched
as the sports utilizing gyms grew in popularity while their space remained unchanged. "I think that the
city leaders and most residents have supported gyms all along," she said. "Unfortunately, for many
reasons we haven't been able to get them built."
Gyms were part of a citywide referendum that failed May 16, 2001. A special election was held for a
$35.8 million city referendum that proposed a 20 -year bond that would have funded improvements at
27 city parks and other city-owned facilities, as well as additions and upgrades to gymnasiums,
swimming pools, playing fields and theaters at Edina Public Schools. Presthus said it has long been
her opinion — and that of many others in the community — that new gyms need to be a part of school
facilities. That's why she supports the proposed gyms for the ECC campus. "The only solution that
ever really made sense was putting gyms at the school sites," she said. "This is the best opportunity
we have in Edina for new gyms."
The ECCNA disagrees. Association members say Braemar Park would be the best alternative for city
gyms, and will again make that case at next week's City Council meeting. The ECCNA expects that
they could be facing off against the athletic associations at the meeting — something they have
become accustomed to doing — but Fesenmaier said they are prepared.
The ECCNA could benefit from the absence of Housh as well. He has been the council's most
outspoken supporter of the gyms, but is expected to be absent from the meeting.
Presthus said she feels like the gym proposal will move forward, but she added that she won't start
celebrating early. "I've been at this too long to start celebrating early," she said.
The City Council will meet at 7 p.m. Tuesday at City Hall, 4801 W. 50th St
PUBLIC HEARING
SCHAEFER ROAD
ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
IMPROVEMENT NO. A -216
`1 -51 Improvement No. A -216
Project Area
aa,
an
mw m eom
m,a m „i_ eam
m„ mm
MM m], gpy,�yry
em, mn
am, _ eaa
aro
°01e mn s,n
my mm
51O 01^ ene
a—
a,
mu
m,s aas
mn mas .a, mn mn m„
am em sn. ea,
eaa
mas ams ma mxa
r�je y ,�.
1O
�.:..� Improvement No. A -216
➢1
U
Project History / Initiation
• Project initiated by staff - at request of
residents:
o Sump pump water along roadway.
• Neighborhood meeting held on November 15,
2004.
• Survey of residents conducted.
• Roadway constructed in 1971.
• Utilities constructed in 1965 & 1993.
• Existing roadway width: 27 -ft to 30 -ft.
'i i Improvement No. A -216
Survey Results
•50% returned —11 of 22 surveys
• 10 - no to decorative street lights
• 6 — yes to some type of traffic calming
• Staff recommendation:
• No decorative street lighting
• Refer residents to Transportation
Commission for traffic calming issues
Improvement No. A -216
Project Scope
•Reconstruct roadway to include:
• Width of 27 -ft.
• No concrete curb and gutter.
• Extend Storm Sewer to accommodate
sump pumps.
• Provide sanitary sewer repairs.
`l Improvement No. A -216
➢3
Y '
Plan view,
Y
ir4 #
1�1 Ell,
`xt-
111 Proposed storm `sewer �.
Improvement No. A -216
Plan: view
10 F
OpD
��� fir. .,�.. ny �._ -4T .. � a¢ Y•"I T. � ,� �`! �. q A
•���amvW ■... swommud• SCfHAUER RD] _
Proposed storm.sewer
Improvement No. A -216 ,
. .' ➢4
Project Costs
• Roadway Project Cost: $188,000
Does not include storm sewer cost
• Utility Cost:
Utility Costs are not included in roadway
costs. These costs will be funded by the
respective utility fund (e.g. water, storm
sewer and sanitary sewer)
Assessments
Methodology -
Improvement No. A -216
Neighborhood reconstruction:
• Based on residential equivalent unit
(REU)
• Single family home is 1 REU
• Adjacent properties with side or rear
yards are assessed 1/3 REU (Based on
address of property).
le J
Improvement No. A -216
➢5
Preliminary
Assessments
• $ 9,400 per
REU
• 10 year
assessment
• 6.5 % interest
° -
m
B-d.,
Improvement No. A -216
Project Schedule
Neighborhood Informational Mtg.....Nov 15, 2004
Council Orders Public Hearing ....March 15, 2005
Receive Feasibility Report ...............April 5, 2005
Public Hearing .... ..........................April 19, 2005
Bid Opening ....... .........................Summer 2005
Award Contract ........................... Summer 2005
Begin Construction ....................... Summer 2005
Complete Construction .... Fall 2005 /Summer 2006
00'
Improvement No. A -216
i6
Staff Recommendation
AUTHORIZE:
IMPROVEMENT NO. A -216
_)
J Improvement No. A -216
➢7
PUBLIC HEARING
SCHAEFER CIRCLE
ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
IMPROVEMENT NO. A -217
� Improvement No. A -217
Project Area
5704
OS 5704 5709 5706
it
5708
5708 5713 5710
a,ry 5712
g 5714
5712 � 5717 716
6208 6204 5718
716 6216 8212
CAt 8201
SC
p
800 6217 6209
8213
5804
0
5810
09-
11
IEJ�
Improvement No. A -217
➢1
Project History / Initiation
• Project initiated by staff - at request of
residents.
• Neighborhood meeting held on
November 15, 2004.
• Survey of residents conducted.
• Roadway constructed in 1962.
• Existing roadway width: 26 -ft to 29 -ft.
Improvement No. A -217
Project History / Initiation
• No curb and gutter.
• Utilities installed:
o Sanitary —1959.
o Water services from Vernon Avenue
and Schaefer Road — No water main.
//le J
1r�C7�
Improvement No. A -217
i2
Existing Conditions
• Pavement in very poor
condition.
• Landscaping in
boulevard. -
rvrrr z; •„+si,,, a.... ,F
Improvement No. A -217
Project Survey Results
• 100% returned — 8 surveys
•7 - no to curb & gutter
96 - no to decorative street lights
• Staff recommendation:
• No decorative street lighting
• No concrete curb and gutter
e [-n
��P)
Improvement No. A -217
➢3
Project Scope
•Reconstruct roadway to include:
o Width of 27 -ft.
o No concrete. curb and gutter.
•Loop watermain through Schaefer Circle
for future hook -ups:
o Will provide services.to property line.
o New Hydrant
• Provide sanitary & storm sewer repairs
Improvement No. A -217
➢4
Project Costs
• Roadway Project Cost: $ 68,000
• Utility Cost:
Utility Costs are not included in roadway
costs. These costs will be funded by the
respective utility fund (e.g. water, storm
sewer and sanitary sewer)
l
Improvement No. A -217
Assessments
Methodology -
• Neighborhood reconstruction:
oBased on residential equivalent unit (REU)
oSingle family home is 1 REU
• $ 8,500 per residential equivalent unit.
• 10 year assessment.
• 6.5 % interest on unpaid balance.
Improvement No. A -217
➢5
Preliminary
05 I 5709 5706
Assessments 5704
5708
5708 5713 5710
5712
5712 5717 5716 5714
d� 6208 620 5718
716 6216 6212
Cot I 6201
800 6217 6209
6213
9
5804
0
5810
809-
11 0
Improvement No. A -217
Project Schedule
Neighborhood Informational Mtg.....Nov 15, 2004
Council Orders Public Hearing ....March 15, 2005
Receive Feasibility Report ...............April 5, 2005
Public Hearing .... ..........................April 19, 2005
Bid Opening ....... .........................Summer 2005
Award Contract ........................... Summer 2005
Begin Construction ....................... Summer 2005
Complete Construction .... Fall 2005 /Summer 2006
Le�J
Improvement No. A -217
M.
Staff Recommendation
AUTHORIZE:
IMPROVEMENT NO. A -217
(le Jj
1r` ") Improvement No. A -217
i7
PUBLIC HEARING
WEST 58TH STREET
ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -328
�tl,r11
�• Improvement No. BA-328
➢1
Project Area
Sete
sets x10
J5'
5518 . pp
�e701616 X0001001 i 1518!517 ��
i ♦__
01
5R3
-._
� �y ; T l g ypf�� e701 4505 6700
i f
67M 57M 5705 5701
�0 570O
� _ = 4� 5713 5700 5705
1
� ^ORQiR _ 6713 3 5712
R
5713 1e0 �
� 5717 tieuntllry 7 67N
=
5717 a $ 6771 5721 5720
5]21
n
5775 5751
w tp31N er
y
scot
seol
seas
t�
5eoo ae5e Sew SB09 seop seoe 5eoe ypg
Seop
5817 ee19 Set? 5513 5912 5e13
SO17 fiele IY Set] 5016 � Se17 5e17 b13 �
5973
Se17
< SRf 5820 < 5521 5520 < 5571 5570 < SR1 .�
S21
SRS SRS ra�c SRp 6Re SRS � 5R5 �
SO2D 5575 5525 6Rp SRO 6 SRD 5574
SBQS
Seip
$033 SWi 56]3 5972 SO73 6097 < 5537 5737 �
�� u
5ea1
5637 fine 6537 SO9e 60,97 6530 5837 5535
6011 6M0 6911 6e10 58/1 SON 5511 SBN
5697
5011
6e1A 6M5 5OM 5615 66N 5515 5e14
3017
5e0f SODO 6001 5e00
6001 6000 bpOt Sp00
SOOt
fip03 ` I SW6 6YW
�5 • 1 SY05 5001
epee
Improvement No. BA -328
➢1
3017
5e0f SODO 6001 5e00
6001 6000 bpOt Sp00
SOOt
fip03 ` I SW6 6YW
�5 • 1 SY05 5001
epee
➢1
Project History / Initiation
• Project initiated by staff:
o 2005 -2009 Capital Improvement Program.
• Roadway and utilities originally
constructed in 1950s.
• Storm sewer improvements in 1979.
• Neighborhood meeting held November
22, 2004.
Improvement No. BA -328
Existing Conditions
• Existing roadway width: I. .t.
30 -ft.
• Intermittent curb and
gutter.
• Pavement deteriorated.
• Band -aid patchwork.
• Drainage problems on
edge of roadway.
Improvement No. BA -328
➢2
Project Scope
Reconstruct roadways to Municipal State -
Aid standards to include:
• Roadway width:
o 28 -ft no- parking
o 32 -ft with parking lane
• New concrete curb and gutter — B618
• New concrete driveway aprons.
• Protect trees along roadway.
• Concrete sidewalk (north side)
Project Scope
• Concrete sidewalk
(north side):
• 5 -ft boulevard
between St. Johns
and Wooddale.
• Behind curb with
parking lane / bay
between Concord and
St. Johns.
Improvement No. BA -328
Improvement No. BA -328
r3
Survey Results
• 63% returned —12 of 19 surveys
• 7 — yes to decorative street lights
• 10 —no to on- street parking
• Staff recommendation:
• Decorative street lighting
• On- street parking
e
(gip)';.
Improvement No. BA-328
➢4
Project Costs
• Roadway Project Cost: $357,000
State Aid Funding (80 %) $ 285,600
• Special Assessment (20 %) $ 71,400
• Utility Cost:
Utility Costs are not included in roadway
costs. These costs will be funded by the
respective utility fund (e.g. water, storm
sewer and sanitary sewer)
1e�01/
Improvement No. BA -328
➢5
Plan view
,' •
y �-
: k
w '
J 29 "1
]
725 54 r
t-
R
W
W 58TH ST
777,
.1. h
O M60 0
:Fc
:dam•
Improvement No. BA -328
Project Costs
• Roadway Project Cost: $357,000
State Aid Funding (80 %) $ 285,600
• Special Assessment (20 %) $ 71,400
• Utility Cost:
Utility Costs are not included in roadway
costs. These costs will be funded by the
respective utility fund (e.g. water, storm
sewer and sanitary sewer)
1e�01/
Improvement No. BA -328
➢5
Municipal State Aid Assessment Policy
Methodology —
Municipal State Aid reconstruction:
• Assess 20% of project cost.
• Based on assessable front footage.
• Adjacent properties with side or rear
yards are assessed at 1/3 the rate (Based
on address of property).
Improvement No. BA -328
Preliminary Assessments
• $ 68 per assessable front foot.
• 10 year assessment. Assessments
$2,620 - $3,070
• 6.5 % interest. $5,320 - $5,430
�(0 — W � — _
W _ o 5717 5720 5717 5716
v W v
5717 -- - - — -
0 CO o o °c 5721 5724 5721 5720
5721 v v 5725 5728 5725 5754
W 58TH ST
5801 5800 5801 1 5800 5801 1 5800 5801 1 5800
a 5805 5804 5805 5804 a 5805 5804 5805 5804
rc 5808 0 5809 5808 s 5809 5808 5809 5808 a
z 5809 5812 v 5813 5812 ° 5813 5812 a 5813 a°
5817 5816 a 5817 5816 5817 5816 LL 5817 5812 8
�r;'�' - - -- - -- — - -- -
Improvement No. BA-328
➢6
Project Schedule
Neighborhood Informational Mtg.....Nov 22, 2004
Council Orders Public Hearing ....March 15, 2005
Receive Feasibility Report ...............April 5, 2005
Public Hearing .... ..........................April 19, 2005
Bid Opening ....... .........................Summer 2005
Award Contract ........................... Summer 2005
Begin Construction ....................... Summer 2005
Complete Construction .... Fall 2005 /Summer 2006
i
Improvement No. BA -328
Staff Recommendation
AUTHORIZE:
IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -328
r /(e
1f 7G/ Improvement No. BA-328
➢%