The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2005-05-17_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL MAY 17, 2005 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of May 3, 2005 II. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of May 3, 2005 and Special Meeting of May 3, 2005 II. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS - Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. If Council wishes to proceed, action by resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council required to pass if improvement is petitioned for; 4/5 favorable rollcall if no petitions. Rollcall A. PUBLIC HEARING ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION - Schaefer Circle - Improvement No. A -217 - continued from 4/19/05 III. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Zoning Ordinances: First Reading requires affirmative rollcall votes of three Council members except that a rezoning from residential to non - residential requires four affirmative votes. Second Reading requires affirmative rollcall votes of three of Council to pass except rezoning from residential to non - residential requires four affirmative votes. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall votes of four members of Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council members required passing. Conditional Use Permit: Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council members required to pass. Variance Appeal: Favorable rollcall of Council Members present to uphold or deny appeal Rollcall A. ORDINANCE NO. 2005 -04 - Lifting a Moratorium on Subdivision of Single Family Dwelling Lots in R -1 Zoning Districts. * B. PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - Good Samaritan Church. 5730 Grove Street. Church Expansion - Continued to 6/7/05 Rollcall C. PUBLIC HEARING - PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL - The Blake School and City of Hopkins. West of Blake Road/ North of Belmore Lane - Continued from 4/19/05 f Agenda/ Edina City Council May 17, 2005 Page 2 IV. AWARD OF BID A. Contract No. ENG 05-4 South Harriet Park (West) Roadway and Utility Improvements B. Contract No. ENG 05 -6 Arden Park Canoe Access and West 54th Street Beautification Improvements V. REPORTS/ RECOMMENDATIONS A. Request For Change To Code Section 900 Regarding Size Of Restaurants Allowed On- Sale Intoxicating Liquor Licenses B. Traffic Safety Staff Review Of May 10, 2005 C. No Parking Resolution - Brookview Avenue, Dewey Hill Road, West 50th Street and West 541h Street D. Off -Leash Dog Park Proposal - Van Valkenburg Park E. Technical Correction To March 1, 2005 Council Minutes, Resolution No. 2005 -18 Change To Legal Description VI. FINANCE A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per Pre -List dated May 4, 2005, TOTAL $536,469.43; and May 11, 2005, TOTAL $591,615.09 VII. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS VIII. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS IX. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES X. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL XI. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEM SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS Mon May 30 MEMORIAL DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Offices Closed Tues Jun 7 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues June 14 Joint Meeting Council /Plan Comm /Trans Comm 5:00 -8:00 P.M. CENT. LAKES PARK CENTRUM Sun June 19 Maetzold Amphitheater Dedication 7:00 P.M. CENTENNIAL LAKE AMPHITHEATER Tues June 21 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thur June 23 Employee Recognition Luncheon 11:00 A.M. BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE Mon July 4 INDEPENDENCE DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Offices Closed Tues July 5 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues July 19 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Aug 2 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Aug 16 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL MAY 3, 2005 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Housh, Hulbert, Masica and Chair Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Housh and seconded by Commissioner Masica approving the Consent Agenda for the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR APRIL 19, 2005, APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Housh and seconded by Commissioner Masica approving the Minutes of the regular meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for April 19, 2005. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda, Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned. Executive Director MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL MAY 3, 2005 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Housh, Hulbert, Masica, and Mayor Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Masica approving the Council Consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Hovland Motion carried. MAY 15 - 21, 2005 PROCLAIMED AS EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES (EMS) WEEK Mayor Hovland proclaimed the week of May 15 - 21, 2005, as Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Week in Edina in honor and recognition of the valuable contributions made by the Edina Emergency Medical Service Providers to the health and well-being of our citizens. Member Masica made a motion proclaiming May 15 -21, 2005, as Emergency Medical Services Week in Edina. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Hovland Motion carried. NATIONAL PUBLIC WORKS WEEK PROCLAIMED FOR MAY 15 - 21, 2005 Mayor Hovland proclaimed the week of May 15 - 21, 2005, as National Public Works Week in Edina and called upon all citizens to recognize the contributions that public works officials make every day to our health, safety, comfort and quality of life. Member Housh made a motion proclaiming the week of May 15 -21 as National Public Works Week in Edina. Member Hulbert seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica. Hovland Motion carried. 2005 HERITAGE PRESERVATION MONTH PROCLAIMED Mayor Hovland proclaimed the month of May as Preservation Month in the City of Edina and encouraged residents to recognize and participate in fostering local pride and maintaining community character in our City. Member Masica made a motion proclaiming May 2005 as Heritage Preservation Month in Edina. Member Hulbert seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Hovland Motion carried. 2005 HERITAGE AWARD PRESENTED Garold Nyberg, Chair of the Edina Heritage Preservation Board, presented the Morningside Neighborhood with the 2005 Heritage Award in recognition of their 100th anniversary, and acknowledged Momingside's contributions to the history, culture and community of the City of Edina. No formal Council action was taken. Page 1 Minutes/Edina Ci!y Council/May 3, 2005 *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 19, 2005, AND BOARD OF APPEAL AND EQUALIZATION MINUTES OF APRIL 25, 2005, APPROVED Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Masica, approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina City Council for April 19, 2005, and Board of Appeal and Equalization Minutes for April 25, 2005. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *PUBLIC HEARING FOR ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PROTECT - BRIDGE LANE AND TOWNES ROAD - IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -312, CONTINUED TO TUNE 7, 2005 Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Masica approving the continuation of the roadway improvement project for Bridge Lane and Townes Road, Improvement No. BA -312, continued to June 7, 2005. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *PUBLIC HEARING FOR ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PROTECT - SHANNON DRIVE - IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -329, CONTINUED TO TUNE 7, 2005 Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Masica approving the continuation of the roadway improvement project on Bridge Lane and Townes Road, Improvement No. BA -329, to June 7, 2005. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. RESOLUTION NO. 2005- ADOPTED GRANTING VACATION OF PUBLIC STREET CONTINUED FROM APRIL 19, 2005 - Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered place on file. Engineer Presentation Engineer Houle explained the developer of the Pukwana Townhomes had requested the City vacate the street right -of -way for Pukwana Lane adjacent to 5125 West 49th Street to allow the platting and development of some townhomes on his property. Mr. Houle stated Time Warner, Centerpoint Energy, Qwest and Xcel Energy have all approved the request conditioned upon the developer relocating the existing private overhead utilities. Mr. Houle added staff recommended the approval of the requested vacation with the following conditions: relocating the above mentioned private utilities, recording the Final Plat of Pukwana Townhomes, and execution of a Developer's Agreement for Pukwana Townhomes covering the installation of the City's utilities. Public Comment No one appeared to comment. Member Masica made a motion seconded by Member Hulbert to close the public hearing. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Hovland. Motion carried. Member Housh made a motion introducing the following resolution and moving its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2005-34 VACATING PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY PUKWANA LANE WHEREAS, a motion of the City Council, on the 7th day of September, 2004, fixed a date for a public hearing on a proposed vacation of utility easements; and WHEREAS, two weeks published and posted notice of said hearing was given and the hearing was continued to October 19, 2004, November 1 and 16, 2004, and December 7, 2004, when it was continued indefinitely until the proponent requests notice be published; Page 2 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 3, 2005 WHEREAS, two weeks published and posted notice of said hearing was given and the hearing was held May 3, 2005, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City and of the public that said vacation be made; and WHEREAS, the Council considered the extent the vacation affects existing easements within the area of the vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric, telephone or cable television poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation to continue maintaining the same, or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove or otherwise attend thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, that the following described public utility easements are hereby vacated effective as of May 3, 2005. PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY TO BE VACATED: A 25 -foot wide strip of land lying east of the Minneapolis, Northfield and Southern R.R. between West 49th Street and Vernon Avenue in Section 28, Township 117, Range 21, Hennepin County, Minnesota. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the aforementioned vacation shall be conditioned upon: 1) Recording Final Plat of Pukwana Townhomes; 2) Execution of Developer's Agreement for installation of City's Utilities; and 3) Developer relocating existing private utilities of Time Warner, Centerpoint Energy, Qwest and Xcel Energy as necessary. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause a notice of completion of proceedings to be prepared, entered in the transfer record of the County Auditor, and filed with the County . Recorder, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851. Passed and adopted this 3rd day of May 2005. Member Hulbert seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Hovland Motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. 850 -A26 ADOPTED GRANTING FINAL REZONING AND RESOLUTION NO 200536 ADOPTED APPROVING FINAL PLAT MARK TONES/PUKWANA TOWNHOME LLC DEVELOPMENT (5125 49TH STREET WEST); CONTINUED FROM APRIL 19, 2005 Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered place on file. Presentation by Planner Planner Larsen stated the proponent has submitted plans and a plat requesting final approvals for Pukwana Townhomes. He said the plans submitted were complete and consistent with the plans given preliminary approval. Mr. Larsen noted the plan would require one ten -foot setback variance from the railroad right -of -way resulting from shifting the building footprint ten feet westerly to provide for snow storage, landscaping and to protect the existing retaining wall on the adjacent property. Mark Jones, 4801 School Road, briefly reviewed the proposed townhomes using a graphic depiction of the exterior colors and materials. He stated the exterior materials would include stucco, brick and concrete boards; and would be substantially as shown on the plans submitted for the final approval. Member Masica asked if the townhomes would be built with details per the graphics shown to Council. Mr. Jones described the changes to the stairways and pediments. Page 3 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 3, 2005 Mayor Hovland asked if a final materials list had been submitted to the Planning Department, whether Mr. Jones had brought any exterior materials samples and what type of windows would be used. Mr. Larsen said he believed the Planning Department had received the materials list. Mr. Jones said he planned on installing double hung windows, perhaps Marvin but the final windows had not been chosen. Mayor Hovland asked Mr. Jones to concur for the record that his townhome development would have brick and stucco exterior materials with accents concrete boards in the colors as shown on plans displayed before the Council. Mr. Jones stated he would concur with using the materials as shown. Public Comment No one appeared to make public comment. Member Masica made a motion, seconded by member Hulbert to close the public hearing. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Hovland Motion carried. Member Housh made a motion to grant second reading to Ordinance No. 850 -A -26 as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 850-A-26 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 850) BY REZONING PROPERTY TO PLANNED RESIDENCE DISTRICT - 3 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Subsection 850.06 of Section 850 of the Edina City Code is amended by adding the following thereto: The extent of the Planned Residence District 3, PRD -3 is enlarged by the addition of the following described property: Lots 7 and 8, Block 4, TINGDALE BROS. BROOKSIDE, HENNEPIN COUNTY MINNESOTA, and VACATED PUKWANA LANE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS A 25 -foot wide strip of land lying east of the Minneapolis, Northfield and Southern R.R. between West 49th Street and Vernon Avenue in Section 28, Township 117, Range 21, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The extent of the Single Dwelling Unit District, R -1 is reduced by removing the property described above. Section 2. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon adoption and publication according to the law. Adopted this 3rd day of May 2005 First Reading: August 17, 2004 Second Reading: May 3, 2005 Published: May 19, 2005 Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Hovland Motion carried. Page 4 James B. Hovland, Mayor Minutes/Edina City Council/May 3, 2005 Member Masica made a motion, seconded by Member Hulbert introducing the following resolution and moving its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2005-36 GRANTING FINAL PLAT APPROVAL TO TINGDALE BROS. BROOKSIDE 2ND ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled, "TINGDALE BROS. BROOKSIDE 2ND ADDITION ", platted by Mark A. Jones, and Denise M. Jones, husband and wife, Farzad Fereshekhou, single, and intersavings Bank, FSB, A Minnesota Corporation, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council on May 3, 2005, be and is hereby granted final plat approval conditioned upon Subdivision Dedication of $19,200. Passed and adopted this 3rd day of May 2005. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Hovland Motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. 2005 -03 AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE ALLOWING RESIDENTIAL IN COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AS CONDITIONAL USE RESOLUTION NO. 2005- GRANTING FINAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - HAUGLAND COMPANIES - 3901 -3907 WEST 50TH STREET AND 5000 -5020 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH - RETAIL AND RESIDENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT, FROM APRIL 19, 2005 Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered place on file. Mayor Hovland stated action on redevelopment proposed for 3901 -3907 West 50th Street and 5000- 5020 France Avenue had been continued to allow the proponent time to fine -tune the proposed plans. Presentation by Proponent Gene Haugland, Haugland Companies, explained the changes made to the proposed building since the last Council meeting. Mr. Haugland said the corner curve had been scaled back and the cornice cut down. The windows on the curved area are more residential and all windows with the exception of the curved area will be double hung. All glass will be clear. At the retail level each space will be left to the individual tenant for design. The proposed exterior brick colors have been softened from the previous plan. Mr. Haugland pointed out that the proposed building would be approximately two feet further back from France Avenue that the existing building, with a corresponding widening of the France Avenue sidewalk. Member Hulbert asked the total height of the proposed building. Mr. Haugland said he believed it would be the same as the Edina Theatre, which was fifty feet high. Member Hulbert expressed her concern over the height of the building. Mayor Hovland asked the proponent to comment on the exterior materials intended for use in the proposed project. Mr. Haugland introduced the project's architect from the Opus Company. John Albers, 4440 York Avenue Linden Hills, Opus, Project Architect displayed samples of the brick proposed for use in the project. He explained there were three families of soft earth tone bricks intended for the project. He said the most intense color would be used in the commercial portion of the projects with the other colors alternating throughout the condominium portion. Page 5 1 Minutes/Edina Cif Council/May 3, 2005 Mayor Hovland commented that Member Swenson had voiced concern about the glass proposed for the ground floor. Mr. Albers stated the glass would be clear glass, but noted that there would be precast cement for about eighteen .inches from the ground to where the glass would begin. He said this would accommodate snow removal and other maintenance equipment. Public Comment Hosmer Brown, 7004 West Shore Drive, stated he has been a long time Edina resident, business owner and business operator in the 50th and France Business area. Mr. Brown expressed his concerns relative to the proposed development including:. setting a precedent, traffic and size of new building. He expressed concern with the access to the underground garages and the potential for difficulty with access for deliveries, trash pick -up, and maintenance. Cheryl Appledorn, 4101 West 48th Street, said she feared the project would change the neighborhood in a big way. Ms. Appledorn said the area was not. blighted so she felt it was not necessary to redevelop it. She stated neighbors did not get noticed until action had already taken place. Ms. Appledorn said she felt the rendering gave a false impression because it depicted the proposed building as shorter than the Edina Theatre sign. Dick Curtin, 6310 Maclntyre Point, stated three. months ago he had many questions regarding the proposed redevelopment. He stated most have been answered and resolved; adding that he supported the proposed redevelopment and thought it would be good for the corner. Mr. Curtin noted that change is difficult even if it was a good change. Member Hulbert shared pictures she took with the Council while on a fact - finding trip to the site of the proposed redevelopment. Member Hulbert showed a photograph of herself in front of the 50 -foot wall of the Edina Theatre depicting the scale of how high fifty feet would stand. She also showed pictures of the current Moeller Jewelry Store with a grid drawn on top. to demonstrate the height of the proposed new building. Member Hulbert expressed her concern with the size and scale of the project. Joni Bennett, 4003 Lynn Avenue, stated she was a member of the Edina Transportation Commission, and related how the Transportation Commission had reviewed the proposal after the Planning Commission had already acted. Ms. Bennett stated she felt the issue of congestion should be dealt with before a redevelopment project of the scale proposed would be considered for approval. Council Discussion/ Action Member Masica asked Mr. Haugland how he was willing to compensate the City for the loss of three parking spaces to allow the residential portion of his project access to their underground garages. Mr. Haugland stated he would be willing. to paint the exterior of the Edina Parking Ramp located between his building and Lund's to a softer taupe color. Mayor Hovland asked about the proposed signage on the retail portion of the project. Mr. Haugland responded it was his intention to keep all retail signage below the building's cornice on the first level. He added that all signage would comply with Edina's sign ordinance. Mr. Haugland said it was not his intent to allow a cookie cutter appearance of signs. Mayor Hovland reiterated the concerns expressed over the height of the proposed building and asked for a comparison of the proposed building to the Pinehurst Building. Mr. Haugland said he could understand concern over the new building, but he pointed out the building at the upper stories was stepped back several feet from the street level. He pointed out the undulating walls with the terraces, Page 6 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 3, 2005 which he felt would project an interesting appearance. Mr. Larsen said the Pinehurst building was approximately 35 feet to the second floor, 50 feet to the top of the cap and 60 feet to the spire. Mayor Hovland asked for comments over the ingress /egress concerns. Mr. Haugland said that to a certain degree ingress/ egress was not easy, but was a trade off of the available options and he said he believed that as proposed it was much better coming through the City's ramp than out to France Avenue. Mr. Haugland pointed out the alley would be used by many entities plus the trash collection. Mayor Hovland noted residents liked the corner as it was presently and asked why the changes had been proposed. Mr. Haugland explained the condition of the buildings warranted rebuilding. He added the floor heights for each building was different making it difficult for the retailers. Member Masica thanked Member Hulbert for her work reviewing the proposed development. She stated she felt there were several mitigating factors in favor of the project and pointed out the increased setback on France plus the stepping back of the upper stories. Member Masica stated she felt the area would be developed and it was in the best interest of the City to ensure the project was high quality. She said she believed the developer had demonstrated that they would build a quality building and enhance the area, concluding she would support the project. Member Housh stated he believed the proposed project would be a good development for the City. He said he felt Gene Haugland was a good developer and reminded the Council that Mr. Haugland could have built a much larger building, but in his opinion the proposed building will improve the area in the future. Member Hulbert said she has heard from many constituents concerned over the potential loss of the small town feel that makes Edina so unique. She -stated she felt the proposed development was too large and would overwhelm the corner. Member Hulbert felt the corner could support a three -story development, but four stories were too high. She stated she would not support the project. Mayor Hovland said he thinks all residents know the 50th and France area was the premiere retail center in the Metropolitan area. He added future development was going to be a matter of balance. Mayor Hovland reiterated that Mr. Haugland could have requested to build 22,000 square feet of commercial space, but instead has proposed a very well designed retail and residential project fitting the area. He added that he believed Edina had a very urban feel and the people who move into the 23 condos would be those who want a pedestrian life style where they can walk to restaurants and retailers. Mayor Hovland applauded Mr. Haugland for setting a new development standard. Member Housh made a motion to grant second reading to Ordinance No. 2005 -3 as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 2005-3 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 850 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES BY ADDING RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS AS A CONDITIONAL USE IN THE PCD -1, 2 AND 3 ZONING DISTRICTS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Subsection 850.16 of Section 850 of the Edina City Code is amended by adding the following new Subd. 6 and renumbering existing Subd. 6-11: " Subd. 6. Conditional Uses in PCD -1, PCD -2 and PCD -3. Residential dwelling units above principal uses." Page 7 Minutes/Edina Ci!y Council/May 3, 2005 Section 2. Subd.12, of Subsection 850.16 is further amended by adding thereto: O. Standards for residential dwelling units. 1. No part of any dwelling unit shall be located at street grade. 2. The floor area of the building used for residential purposes shall be exempt from the Floor Area requirements of the underlying district. 3. Dwelling units with a floor area of 1,500 square feet or less shall provide a minimum of 1.25 fully enclosed parking spaces per unit. Dwelling units exceeding 1,500 square feet shall provide a minimum of 1.5 fully enclosed parking spaces per unit. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect after its adoption and publication according to the law. First Reading. March 15, 2005 Second Reading. May 3, 2005 Published: May 19, 2005 Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Member Masica seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Masica, Hovland Nay: Hulbert Motion carried. James B. Hovland, Mayor Member Housh introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2005-22 GRANTING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO HAUGLAND COMPANIES 3901 -3907 WEST 50TH STREET AMD 5000 -5020 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH WHEREAS, the procedural requirements of Code Section 850 (the Zoning Ordinance) have been met; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that the Findings as required by Code Section No. 850.04 Subd. 4 have been satisfied: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby grants approval of a Conditional Use Permit to Haugland Companies, 3901 -3907 West 50th Street and 5000 -5020 France Avenue South, to allow dwelling units in the PCD -2 Planned Commercial District, with the following conditions: 1) Platting the property to incorporate all easement vacations and dedications; 2) Developer's Agreement covering utility work and restoration of streets and walks; a 3) Watershed District permits, 4) Building components shall be as presented to Council; and 5) Developer shall paint the City's Parking ramp to specifications of the City. Passed and adopted this 3rd day of May. Member Masica seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Masica, Hovland Nay: Hulbert Motion carried. *BID AWARDED FOR 2005 TREATMENT OF LAKES AND PONDS Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Masica for award of bid for treatment of lakes and ponds for 2005 to recommended low bidder, Lake Management, Inc., at $25,234.11. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. Page 8 Minutes/Edina Ci!y Council/May 3, 2005 *BID AWARDED FOR EIGHT NIGHT VISION UNITS FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Masica for award of bid for eight (8) Night Vision Units to sole bidder, Blue Line Gear with funding at $27,210.75 paid for by private donor. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR SINGLE AXLE TRUCK CHASSIS FOR THE STREET DEPARTMENT Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Masica for award of bid for one single axle chassis for public works to recommended sole bidder, Boyer Trucks, Inc., under State Contract #433621 at $54,717.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR HOOK TRUCK SYSTEM FOR THE STREET DEPARTMENT Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Masica for award of bid for one "hook truck" system for the street department to recommended sole bidder, J Craft, Inc., at $80,833.50 under State Contract # 433312. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT - 5900 BLOCK OF CONCORD AVENUE AND ASHCROFT AVENUE (CONTRACT NO. ENG 05 -3) Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Masica for award of bid for Contract No. Eng. 05 -3, Storm Sewer Improvement for 5900 Block of Concord Avenue and Ashcroft Avenue, Improvement No. STS -287, to recommended low bidder, Ro -So Contracting at $116,659.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. RENEWAL OF CONTRACT AGREEMENT BETWEEN BLOOMINGTON AND EDINA FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES Karen Zeleznack, Bloomington Public Health Services, 1800 West Old Shakopee Road, Bloomington, informed the Council that the contract agreement between Bloomington and Edina for Community Health Services has a three percent increase from the 2004 Bloomington contract agreement. This is due to changes in programming and reporting requirements. Community health services will be delivered through senior health promotions, vulnerable adult assessments, public health nurse clinics, high -risk home assessments, and community health educational opportunities. Member Masica questioned if the difference between the 2005 Community Health Services Grant funding of $121,198 and the Bloomington contract agreement of $156,180 is a budgeted item. Mr. Hughes said that yes it is a budgeted item. Member Hulbert inquired where Bloomington Public Health Services gets their referrals. Ms. Zeleznack said from social services, the police department, the senior center, or a community member. Member Masica made a motion to approve the Community Health Services Agreement with Bloomington Public Health Division for $160,865 for calendar year 2005. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Hovland Motion carried. Page 9 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 3, 2005 *RENEWAL OF CONTRACT AGREEMENT BETWEEN BLOOMINGTON AND EDINA FOR PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDNESS Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Member Masica approving renewal of a contract .agreement between Bloomington and Edina for Public Health Preparedness for 2005. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. APPOINTMENT MADE TO HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD Mayor Hovland indicated his intention to appoint Arlene Forrest to fill an unexpired term to February 1, 2006, on the Heritage Preservation Board. Mayor Hovland made a motion to appoint Arlene Forrest to fill the unexpired term to February 1, 2006, on the Heritage Preservation Board. Member Masica seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -33 APPROVED - DECLARING TRANSPORTATION ISSUES A PRIORITY Mayor Hovland explained that a resolution had been provided to the Council as the result of work by the regional council of mayors from the eleven county metropolitan area. Transportation is the main concern of the mayors. They prepared a resolution for consideration by councils in the eleven county area calling upon the leaders in the executive and legislative branches to create a long- term solution both with respect to public transit and road and bridge systems. The resolution would be an encouraging factor to do something in the 2005 legislative session. Member Masica introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2005-33 DECLARING TRANSPORTATION ISSUES A PRIORITY Whereas, too many Minnesotans unnecessarily lose time and money due to traffic gridlock: Metropolitan area drivers each absorb a "congestion tax" of over $700 per year,. and collectively waste over 93 million gallons of fuel annually; and Whereas, one million additional people are expected to live in the metropolitan region in the next two decades, further exacerbating our already unacceptable traffic congestion; and Whereas, Minnesota's investment in roads and transit continues to fall behind our peer metropolitan regions in the United States; and Whereas, congested and unsafe roads hinder economic prosperity, erode quality of life, and complicate numerous aspects of life in Minnesota: parents spend less time with their kids and more time in traffic, emergency vehicles take longer to respond, and truckloads of consumer goods increase in price as commercial vehicles are unduly delayed moving freight from. origin to destination; and Whereas, solving our transportation problem is a complex and long -term challenge that will require various strategies; and Whereas, Minnesota needs to adequately and strategically expand both its transit system and roads with predictable, accountable, and long -term funding sources; and Whereas, new transportation financing must prioritize public transit within a comprehensive, multi - modal, interconnected transportation system that serves the 11 -county metro area; and that light rail and commuter rail lines, along with expanded bus service, be expanded to support the population and businesses in our fast - growing region; and Whereas, urgent, courageous and visionary leadership is vital to forging a sustainable, long -term transportation plans for our state and region. This leadership must drive progress on such a long -range plan and maintain accountability for the process to the public. Therefore, Be It Resolved that, as elected leaders representing cities in Minnesota's fast - growing 11 -county metropolitan region, we hereby declare our belief that transportation has Page 10 r Minutes/Edina City Council/May 3, 2005 become one of the most vexing problems facing our communities and state and requires urgent attention from our state's leaders. We call upon the leaders in the legislative and executive branches to create a long -term solution to our transportation needs, and to do so in the 2005 legislative session. Adopted this 3rd day of May 2005. Member Hulbert seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Hovland Motion carried. TECHNICAL CORRECTION APPROVED TO APRIL 11 2005 BOARD OF REVIEW MINUTES Manager Hughes noted that information from a late submission to the April 11, 2005, Board of Review Minutes had inadvertently been omitted. Member Housh made a motion approving the technical correction to the April 11, 2005, Board of Review Minutes as presented. Member Hulbert seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Hovland Motion carried. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Member Housh made a motion and Member Masica seconded the motion approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated April 20, 2005, and consisting of 27 pages: General Fund $75,597.71; Communications Fund $14,987.49; Working Capital Fund $8,829.62; Construction Fund $18,227.82, Art Center Fund $407.88; Golf Dome Fund $1,671.68; Aquatic Center Fund $41.29; Golf Course Fund $28,974.05; Ice Arena Fund $1,952.81; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $11,841.88; Liquor Fund $103,983.02; Utility Fund $393,364.04; Storm Sewer Fund $8,122.83, Recycling Fund $33,874.00; TOTAL $701,876.12, and for approval of payment of claims dated April 27, 2005, and consisting of 37 pages: General Fund $522,453.05; Communications Fund $9,353.28; Working Capital Fund $34,240.46; Art Center Fund $18,546.58; Golf Dome Fund $3,596.30, Aquatic Center Fund $322.64; Golf Course Fund $14,198.65; Ice Arena Fund $21,346.05; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $7,888.28; Liquor Fund $191,104.27; Utility Fund $147,727.68; Storm Sewer Fund $60,120.73; PSTF Fund $1,383.34; TOTAL $1,032,281.31. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. DESIGNATION AND RESERVE OF FUND BALANCE APPROVED Manager Hughes voiced pleasure with the financial year for 2004. He recommended a transfer of liquor contributions that were scheduled to enter the General Fund, in the amount of $666,500 be transferred to the revolving fund. This would allow funding for the Capital Improvement Plan in 2006 and in future years. Following a Council discussion, Member Housh made a motion to approve the recommended designation of the 2004 Fund Balance as presented. Member Hulbert seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Hovland Motion carried. *PETITION RECEIVED FROM BRUCE CARLSON - REQUESTING WATERMAIN AT 6201 INTERLACHEN BOULEVARD Member Housh made a motion accepting a petition from Bruce Carlson, 1440 Bavarian Shore Drive, Chaska, MN, requesting a watermain at 6201 Interlachen Boulevard, and referring the petition to Engineering for processing as to feasibility. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. Page 11 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 3, 2005 There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 9:32 P.M. City Clerk Page 12 MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL ON MARCH 15, 2005 AT 5:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Also attending the meeting were members of the Subdivision Task Force Rod Hardy, N. Craig Johnson, Robert Johnson and Meg Mannix; and Planning Commissioners Steve Brown, Dave Byron, Helen McClelland, David Runyan, Michael Schroeder and Geoffrey Workinger. Mayor Hovland explained the purpose of the meeting was to receive the results of the Subdivision Task Force's Study completed with Greg Ingraham, Ingraham and Associates, the consultant who assisted the Task Force. Mr. Ingraham reviewed the Task Force's study findings as follows: Study Goals: • Objectively analyze the subdivision regulations (independent consultant and resident Task Force). • Evaluate subdivisions that were built using the regulations. • Compare Edina's regulations to other cities. • Determine if changes are needed. • If needed, prepare recommendations for ordinance amendments. Study Task Force Members: • Rod Hardy • Mary Vasaly • N. Craig Johnson • Craig Larsen, City Planner • Robert Johnson • Greg Ingraham, AICP, Ingraham & • Meg Mannix Associates, Inc. Edina Subdivision Regulations - Single Family Residential District (Paraphrased): • Lot size, width, depth and width -to -lot perimeter ratio of new subdivisions must be equal to or greater than the median lot size, width, depth and width to perimeter ratio of the surrounding neighborhood (properties within 500 feet of the proposed subdivision). • Basic Code Premise - New lots must be substantially similar to the surrounding existing lots. Study Process: • Evaluate subdivisions built since 1990. • Review existing subdivision regulations. • Comparison with other cities ordinances. • Task Force meeting review goals and code. • Task Force evaluates subdivisions. • Task Force meeting - discuss evaluations, regulations and draft recommendations. • Prepare findings and final recommendations. Minutes/Edina City Council Work Session/May 3, 2005 City Approved Subdivisions since 1990 - *Indicated Task Force Reviewed: • Brennan Addition Approved 1990* • Arrowhead Addition 11 -Lots Approved • Jyland Whitney Approved 1990* 1996* • Ratelle Hill Approved 1990* • Brendan Glen Approved 2003* • Cunningham Addition Approved 1991 • Blake Heights Approved 2001 & 2004 • Harold Woods Lane Approved 1992* Mendoza 2 -lot Addition Approved 2003 • Granger Addition 2 -Lots Approved 1992* Aaron Addition 2 -Lots Approved 1995 • Granger Addition 2 -Lots Approved 1992 Zuppkewood Addition • Willards Knoll Approved 1993 • Northview 2 -Lots Approved 1999 • Fink Addition Approved 1993* Olinger Ridge 2 -Lots Approved 2000 • Oak Bend Approved 1995 Gearen Addition Approved 2003 Study Findings and Recommendation: • Some subdivisions are "islands" within older. housing. Acceptable and natural situation. • Quality of the new subdivisions is high. Matches or exceeds the surrounding - neighborhood. • New subdivisions are appropriate for the neighborhood and the city. • Setbacks seem too small in some subdivisions, but larger houses on smaller lots are OK. • City should maintain setbacks and lot coverage limits similar to the surrounding area. • Existing subdivision code promotes good development and is appropriate. No changes are recommended. The Council, Task Force and Planning Commission discussed the results of the study and its implications. Consensus was that nothing further needed to be done with the City's subdivision regulations. In addition, the group also discussed the setbacks and variances and the impact of both large renovations and teardowns. Staff will pursue a list of potential participants for a group to study this set of issues in the near future. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, the Mayor adjourned the meeting at 6:25 p.m. City Clerk REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Wayne D. Houle, PE/ City Engineer / Date: May 17, 2005 Subject: Continued Public Hearing for Schaefer Circle — Roadway Improvement No. A -217 Agenda Item # ILA Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ® Resolution Ordinance Discussion Recommendation: If the Council determines the project to be warranted and necessary, Council shall adopt a resolution approving Schaefer Circle Roadway Improvements, City Improvement No. A -217, authorize plans and specifications to be completed and bids taken. This project will require a 4/5 favorable vote from the Council to move the project forward. Info /Background: This project was initiated by staff from a resident request to address drainage problems at the east end of the cul -de -sac along with our Street Department recommendation to reconstruct the roadway. This project was continued from the April 19, 2005 Public Hearing. Staff has revised the Feasibility Study to include issues raised at this Public Hearing. Staff has notified the residents of this continuation along with conducting ,a survey of the homes, regarding the level of work proposed (see Feasibility Study for details). Although the results of the survey indicate that a majority of the residents prefer the "do nothing" option, staff continues to recommend Option 3: Reconstruct the roadway. The estimated construction cost for this Option is $63,200. This cost does not include costs for the watermain or other City utility repairs; staff is analyzing these repairs and will include them with final plans; funding for these repairs will be funded through the respective utility funds. The costs of the roadway remain the same if the watermain is or is not installed. Funding for the roadway will be from a special assessment of approximately $ 7,900 per residential equivalent unit (REU). This cost is reduced from the original Public Hearing due to closer analysis of the actual roadway costs and what costs can be placed on the installation of the new watermain. Staff analyzed the project and feels that the project is feasible from an engineering standpoint. G: \Engineering \lmprovements\A217 Schaefer Circle \CORRESPONDENCE \Misc \RRpublic hearing - A217R.doc 491A,r,,l, ok a FEASIBILITY STUDY — A217 (Revised) Nf� 0 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT •,Y�£a. CITY OF EDINA STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS SCHAEFER CIRCLE MAY 17, 2005 LOCATION: The Schaefer Circle project includes the neighborhood east of Schaefer Road (see Figure 1). 05 5704 5709 5706 5708 5708 5713 5710 Projec Boundtary 5712 5712 � 5717 "" 5716 5714 6204 6208 5718 5716 6216 6212 • 6201 SGNAEFER G1F 800 6209 6217 6213 9 5804 �P 16-6 5810 809- 11 Figure 1. Project Area Map Feasibility Study (Revised) Schaefer Circle Imp. No. A -217 May 17, 2005 INITIATION & ISSUES: The Schaefer Circle project was initiated partially by a resident request to address drainage problems at the east end of the cul -de -sac and also staff initiated by the Street Department. The Street Department in 2000 / 2001 reviewed the condition of the roadway prior to seal coating roadways within the neighborhood. It was determine that the pavement was beyond its useful life and additional preventive maintenance would not be economically feasible. The following are existing features that present issues in determining the feasibility of the project and are addressed in this report: • Poor condition of existing pavement. • Surface rainwater drainage issues. • No existing watermain in Schaefer Circle Residents experience "brown water' problems. Existing landscaping, mailboxes, driveways, etc. A neighborhood informational meeting was held on November 15, 2005 to gather data and answer questions the homeowners had relating to the project. Approximately six residents attended this meeting. The first neighborhood survey was sent to learn the favorability of constructing concrete curb and gutters and installing decorative street lights with this project. Input from the survey and comments received throughout the planning of this project have been included in this report as an attachment. The results of the survey are shown in Table 1. Table 1. Survey Results Note: * 3 surveys responded and ranked Traditional No. 1 - no others were ranked The Public Hearing for this project was held on April 19, 2005. The Public Hearing was continued until May 17, 2005, due to the following concerns of the Council: 1. Why is there such a pressing need for this project? 2. Can the roadway be overlayed with a layer of pavement? And at what cost? 3. Why does the water system need to be revised? 4. How long would the project be an inconvenience? Staff then resurveyed the neighborhood asking for input on the following roadway options: Option 1: Do nothing: This involves minimally maintaining the roadway, filling potholes, etc. Due to the current state of the roadway we would Page 2 of 8 Returned Prefer Curb & Gutter Prefer Decorative Street Lights Total Surveys Surveys Yes No B -HEAD S -MOUNT Yes No Style Sent Colonial Acorn Traditional 8 8 1 7 1 1 2 6 r-1. f Returned Surveys 100% 12% 88% 25% 75% Note: * 3 surveys responded and ranked Traditional No. 1 - no others were ranked The Public Hearing for this project was held on April 19, 2005. The Public Hearing was continued until May 17, 2005, due to the following concerns of the Council: 1. Why is there such a pressing need for this project? 2. Can the roadway be overlayed with a layer of pavement? And at what cost? 3. Why does the water system need to be revised? 4. How long would the project be an inconvenience? Staff then resurveyed the neighborhood asking for input on the following roadway options: Option 1: Do nothing: This involves minimally maintaining the roadway, filling potholes, etc. Due to the current state of the roadway we would Page 2 of 8 Feasibility Study (Revised) Schaefer Circle Imp. No. A -217 May 17, 2005 anticipate a total reconstruction within five years meaning the entire roadway would need to be removed and replaced. Option 2: Overlay the roadway pavement with an additional 2" pavement: Staff feels that you will start seeing reflective cracking through this pavement within two years and major pavement deterioration within seven years. We would anticipate driveway drainage issues at 6208 and 6201. A reconstruction would be needed in 2012. However, this type of reconstruction would not be as severe as Option 1, since the materials below the pavement will have been protected by the overlay and will not need to be removed and replaced. Option 3: Reconstruct the roadway: This type of reconstruction would be similar to the reconstruction of Option 2 where the materials below the pavement would remain and only the pavement would be replaced. The costs for these three options were analyzed from a life cycle cost point of view. We used a 40 -year life, 3% inflation, 100% assessments for the reconstruction and any mill and overlays for all 3 options. We have also reviewed the duration of the project with contractors familiar with Edina; this would be for any work anticipated in 2005. The results of these three options are found in Table 2: Table 2: Costs of Roadway Options The results of Survey No. 2 are shown in Table 3. Table 3. Survey Results Total Surveys Sent Returned Surveys Total Roadway Cost to 2005 Assessment Duration of Option Project Description homeowners (over 40 Cost per Home construction - 2005 1 of Returned Surveys ears 1 Do Nothing $150,400 0 0 2 1 Overlay Pavement $134,400 $3,200 2 days 3 Reconstruct Pavement $109,300 $7,900 4 -5 weeks The results of Survey No. 2 are shown in Table 3. Table 3. Survey Results Total Surveys Sent Returned Surveys Option Preferred 1. Do Nothing 2. Overlay 3. Reconstruct 8 7 4 2 1 of Returned Surveys 1 88% Note: ' 2 of the 8 surveys did not rank the options The following is a summary regarding both survey results including staff's recommendations: • The majority of residents do not prefer new concrete curb and gutter — Reasons to construct concrete curb and gutter in this neighborhood include: concrete curb and gutter tends to be more cost effective over the life of the street, reduces pavement failure, provides safety, controls drainage, provides driveway and traffic control, prevents roadway edge Page 3 of 8 Feasibility Study (Revised) Schaefer Circle Imp. No. A -217 May 17, 2005 rutting, prevents boulevard damage, and aids cleaning and snow plowing. Although staff recommends constructing concrete curb and gutter in this neighborhood, it is feasible to partially improve the roadway without including concrete curb and gutter with this project. (The cost estimate and assessment amount included in the report do not include curb and gutter costs.) The majority of residents do not prefer installing decorative street lighting — Staff does not recommend including decorative street lighting with this project since lighting is not supported by the property owners and a direct benefit to each property for this improvement is difficult to substantiate. The majority of residents prefer the "do nothing" option. Staff continues to recommend Option 3 (Reconstruct the roadway) as it is the prudent choice with respect to life cycle costs, roadway durability and constructability, and it addresses the watermain issues and needs (later discussed in the report). EXISTING CONDITIONS: The roadway in this neighborhood was originally constructed in 1962, the sanitary sewer was installed in 1958 and the water services were installed in 1959 and 1977. The roadway width varies ranging from 26 -ft to 29 -ft with no curb and gutter and no sidewalks. The pavement condition varies but is in very poor condition overall (see Photo 1). Photo 1. Existing Pavement Condition The pavement is well beyond it useful life. Overlaying or seal coating the pavement in this neighborhood is not feasible. Overall the base aggregate material below the pavement appears to be in good condition. However there is an area where the base aggregate / subgrade materials is showing early Page 4 of 8 Feasibility Study (Revised) Schaefer Circle Imp. No. A -217 May 17, 2005 signs of failure (See Photo 2). Street grades within the neighborhood are relatively flat in the cul -de -sac with a steeper sloping roadway on the west end. Typical features exist adjacent to the roadway such as retaining walls, concrete driveways, landscaping, shrubs, trees and mailboxes. There is some existing storm sewer in the area with isolated surface drainage problems. Photo 2. Existing Pavement Condition Currently, no watermain exists in Schaefer Circle. The existing water system consists of a two - 1'/2" and one — 1'/4" pipes that serve 7 homes, see Figure 2. The Minnesota Department of Health requires a minimum of a 6" watermain for municipal water systems. Two of these water lines were installed in 1958; this type of line typically lasts 40 years. Based on equivalent water lines in the City, we do anticipate problems in the near future. Staff also analyzed fire protection within the neighborhood; fire hydrants located at Schaefer Road and from Vernon Avenue serve Schaefer Circle. The City's Fire Marshal suggests a fire hydrant be installed at the end of the cul -de -sac to meet today's standards. Staff anticipates that any roadway reconstruction would initiate the installation of a watermain. A water service size increase would also necessitate a larger watermain; this could be required from having a substantial home remodeling or if a new home is constructed. Most of the private utilities in this neighborhood are overhead and serve the residents from the back of the properties with the exception of the gas lines, which are buried in the roadway. Page 5 of 8 Feasibility Study (Revised) Schaefer Circle Imp. No. A -217 May 17, 2005 Figure 2. Existing Water Services PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: This project involves reconstructing the existing bituminous pavement, installing new watermain, repairing sanitary sewer as needed, and replacing the water services from the new watermain to the curb boxes (valves located at the property lines). The proposed roadway width is 27 -ft, which closely matches the existing width and helps minimize impacts to the surrounding topography and landscaping features (see Figure 3). Trees will be protected and impacts to the trees will be minimized. Figure 3. Proposed Project Layout Page 6 of 8 Feasibility Study (Revised) Schaefer Circle Imp. No. A -217 May 17, 2005 Staff is continuing to analyze the utility repairs /replacements and will include the needed improvements with the final plans. Other utility activities may include replacement of gas mains within the neighborhood, which is determined and coordinated by the local gas utility company. RIGHT -OF -WAY & EASEMENTS: The right -of -way along Schaefer Road is 60 -ft wide (60 -ft radius in the cul -de- sac). All proposed roadway improvements stay within this right -of -way. A 20 -ft utility easement exists between 6209 and 6201 Schaefer Circle; this easement will be utilized for the new watermain. FEASIBILITY: This project is feasible from an engineering and City standpoint. PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $ 63,200. The total cost includes indirect costs of 15% for engineering and clerical costs and 7.5% for first year finance costs. The estimated construction cost does not include storm sewer, watermain or utility improvements. New watermain is anticipated to be installed in this neighborhood; however, the final utility improvements will be determined during the final design and will be funded through the respective utility fund. Funding for the entire project will be from a combination of special assessment and utility funds. ASSESSMENTS: A special assessment of approximately $ 7,900 per residential equivalent unit or assessable lot will be levied against residents adjacent to the neighborhood's roadways (see Figure 4). The justification for assessments is attributed to properties receiving benefit of the new pavement. The assessable lot is based on a detached single family home. A 10 -year payback period for these special assessments is proposed for this project. PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule is feasible from an Engineering standpoint: ATTACHMENTS: Council Orders Public Hearing ........... ..........................March 15, 2005 Receive Feasibility Report ............... ............................... April 5, 2005 Public Hearing .. ............................... ..........................April 19, 2005 Public Hearing - cont ................... ............................... May 17, 2005 Bid Opening .......... ............................... ...........................July 2005 Award Contract .......................... ............................... Summer 2005 Begin Construction ..................... ............................... Summer 2005 Complete Construction ... ............................... Fall 2005 /Summer 2006 • Information Meeting Attendance List and Comments • Survey No. 1 Results and Comments • Survey No. 2 Results and Comments • Resident Letter No. 4 • Preliminary Assessment Roll Page 7 of 8 Feasibility Study (Revised) Schaefer Circle Imp. No. A -217 May 17, 2005 705 5704 5709 5706 5708 9 5708 5713 5710 Project 5712 15716 IWO R to Boundary 5 7 1 2 5714 5717 ��••'•,•�• %5716 • ..............• 6204 °• 'Ok 6208 »''% 5718 /6216 6212 ''•., SCHA�F�R CtR 6217 , $O 6213 4� �P �O 6209 6201 809 - 11 1 Aeeeeemente O 37.900.00 Figure 4. Preliminary Assessment Map Page 8 of 8 SIGN IN SHEET - IN..RMATION MEETING Schaefer Circle November 15, 2004 (Please print legibly - Thank you Name(s) Address 2. Jr "a-rt 0 5 In C-) 3. J �. �T c. e- A,4 VN, Z;J S � C 'e- 4. 217 J' v 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Phi Caft mitsiv7 W"c: L . QUESTION / COMMENT CARD _ r ,o,..oriAnX um 11%c+ 1L, WAA 46- eKip," ve dt.Arealot �. (LL d uestt ow ed �'Ivz� Nave L as I,( Address o2d� sc k&a pf C,..Cc le- PLEASE PPINT PLEASE PRINT QUESTION / COMMENT CARD r Name -Dr P 8 3 r Address D 4 5&� aege r 0,1"r cl e PLEASE PRrNf PLEASE PRINT or i -!" Hasbargen 6213 Schaefer Circle Edina, MN 55436 952- 932 -0877 Mr. Steven L. Lillehau Edina Traffic Engineer�Assistant Engineer City Hall 4801 west 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: improvement No. A -217 Schaefer Circle Dear Mr. Lillehaug: This is in reference to the above mentioned road improvement on Schaefer circle. For the record, we are against the improvements mentioned in your letter, dated December 9, 2004. For a road, which has limited traffic, the amount mentioned for this project seems outlandish. we are also hard pressed to understand why resurfacing the road is not covered by our taxes. we are also not in favor of the curb and gutter improvement and the streetlight. it seems to us, these two improvements are out of character with the surrounding neighborhood. we have no rainwater drainage issues. Further, we are unaware of any thing that has changed drainage in the neighborhood. If the issue of drainage is arising because there are issues with those who live at the end of the cul- de -sac, these issues do not impact the rest of the circle and should be addressed as so. The geography of our neighborhood hasn't changed at all. This is not an issue. Thank you for taking the time to read our comments. we appreciate keeping us up to date on these issues and will wait to hear from you in the near future. very truly yours, Donald and Terese Hasbargen SCHAEFER CIRCLE IMPROVEMENT NO. A -217 SURVEY RESULTS (N o - -I) NO STREET Retumed Preferred Curb & Gutter Decorative Street Lights COMMENTS Survey Yes No B-HEAD S -MOUNT Yes No Style Colonial Aeon Traditional 6201 SCHAEFER CIR X X X 6204 SCHAEFER CIR X X X 6208 SCHAEFER CIR X X X X 1 We are very interested in burying the power lines. 6209 SCHAEFER CIR X X X X 1 We are in favor of a new street - perhaps C&G, but not upgrade every one elses waterline. We would not benefit from It. We hooked up to city water directly from Vernon and no one on our street helped pay for it. 6212 1 SCHAEFER CIR X X X I would prefer that this project not take place at all. Resurfacing the road would be fine, but I am totally against the water and utility improvement part of the project. 6213 SCHAEFER CIR X I X I X Letter attached. 6216 SCHAEFER CIR X I X X 1 I am on a comer lot and would probably have to pay once for Schaefer Cir and then again for Schaefer Rd construction. The darkness is most upsetting. It is dangerous and a security risk. Thank you. 6217 SCHAEFER CIR X X X Total Surveys Retumed Prefer Curb & Gutter Prefer Decorative Street Lights Survey Yes No B-HEAD S-MOUNT Yes No style Sent Colonial I Aeon ITraditional 8 8 1 7 1 1 2 6 0 0 1 % of Returned Surveys 100% 'and 12.50% 87.50% 25% 75% Note: • 3 surveys responded Traditional No.1 - no others were ranked SCHAEFER CIRCLE IMPROVEMENT NO. A -217 SURVEY No. 2 RESULTS NO STREET Returned Option Preferred 1. Do Nothing COMMENTS 8 7 Survey 2 1 1. Do Nothing 2. Overlay 3. Reconstruct 6201 SCHAEFER CIR X 1 3 2 The road definitely needs repair as it is rapidly detiorating. Option #3 is totally unacceptable because of the long (4 -5 weeks) time period involved. If Schaefer Circle 6204 SCHAEFER CIR X 1 2 1 3 is obstructed, we are totally unable to reach our home. Dr. & Mrs. Paul R. Hartig Our street has deteriorated badly during the last year. A few freeze -thaw cycles would probably turn the street to rubble. I value Mr. Houle's experience and knowledge. I sincerely hope the street is completely reconstructed including new water service. Mr. Lasky indicated there was complete agreement on our whole street regarding this matter. This is not true. He does not speak for me. If a decision has been made not to improve the water supply, I would appreciate it very much if you would let me know. 6208 SCHAEFER CIR X 1 3 2 1 Thanks Jim Gaasedelen 6209 SCHAEFER CIR X 1 6212 SCHAEFER CIR X 1 What happened to doing a real resurface of the road which might have a longer life 6213 SCHAEFER CIR X 1 2 3 then option 2 as opposed tooption 2, an overlay? . 6216 SCHAEFER CIR 6217 SCHAEFER CIR -XI 1 Total Surveys Sent Returned Surveys Option Preferred 1. Do Nothing 2. Overlay 3. Reconstruct 8 7 4 2 1 % of Returned Surveys 88% Note: • 2 of the 8 surveys did not rank the options of a Survey and Comment Sheet No. 2 Schaefer Circle Improvement No. A -217 CITY OF EDINA v a P Please complete the following survey and comment sheet and return it either to the Engineering Department or in the enclosed stamped envelope to our office by 4:30 PM Tuesday, May 10, 2005. Please contact Wayne Houle at 952 - 826 -0443 if you have any questions. Option 1: Do nothing — This involves minimally maintaining the roadway, filling potholes, etc. Due to the current state of the roadway we would anticipate a total reconstruction within five years meaning the entire roadway would need to be removed and replaced. Option 2: Overlay the roadway pavement with an additional 2" pavement — Staff feels that you will start seeing reflective cracking through this pavement within two years and major pavement deterioration within seven years. We would anticipate driveway drainage issues at 6208 and 6201. A reconstruction would be needed in 2012. However, this type of reconstruction would not be as severe as Option 1 since the materials below the pavement will not need to be removed and replaced. Option 3: Reconstruct the roadway - This type of reconstruction would be similar to Option 2 where the materials below the pavement would remain and only the pavement would be replaced. • 1. Please rank the preferred option from 1 to 3 with 1 being the most liked. Please rank • • regardless of your answer to the previous question and in order from 1 to 3 (1 being the most • desirable). Option 1- Do nothing • Option 2 - Overlay the roadway pavement with an additional 2" pavement • Option 3 - Reconstruct the roadway Comments: Address: Total Roadway Option Project Description Cost to 2005 Assessment Duration of construction homeowners Cost per Home -2005 over 40 ears 1 Do Nothing $150,400 0 0 2 Overlay Pavement $134,400 $3,200 2 days 3 Reconstruct Pavement $109,300 $7,900 4 -5 weeks • 1. Please rank the preferred option from 1 to 3 with 1 being the most liked. Please rank • • regardless of your answer to the previous question and in order from 1 to 3 (1 being the most • desirable). Option 1- Do nothing • Option 2 - Overlay the roadway pavement with an additional 2" pavement • Option 3 - Reconstruct the roadway Comments: Address: May 5, 2005 Schaefer Circle Area Residents Edina, Minnesota RE: Resident Letter No. 4 Schaefer Circle City of Edina, Improvement No. A -217 Dear Resident: The Edina City Council has continued the Public Hearing for the above project until May 17, at 7:00 PM in the Edina City Council Chambers. At the April 19th Public Hearing the City Council requested staff to analyze the cost to overlay the existing roadway. Issues that were heard by the Council at the Public Hearing included the following: 1. Why is there such a pressing need for this project? 2. Can the roadway be overlayed with a layer of pavement? And at what cost? 3. Why does the water system need to be revised? 4. How long would the project be an inconvenience? The history of the project started when the adjoining neighborhood was seal coated in 2000- 2001. Public Works staff felt that this pavement was beyond its useful life. A couple of the residents within the cul -de -sac asked, "Why the roadway was not seal coated ?" After learning that the pavement is beyond normal maintenance, the residents agreed with our street department staff that the roadway should be placed on our reconstruction list. Fall of 2004, engineering staff proposed a very aggressive roadway reconstruction schedule for the City, due to how fast the pavements are deteriorating. If a roadway is constructed to current standards, we anticipate the roadway to last 35 to 55 years. Our current practice or strategy for City roadways is to seal coat the roadway every seven years and mill and overlay every 20 years. Given the amount of time between major reconstructions, it makes sense to review and update all City owned utilities. The gas company will also update their utilities when a roadway is reconstructed. The existing water system consists of a two - 1Y2" and one — 1 %" pipes that serve 7 homes. The Minnesota Department of Health requires a minimum of a 6" watermain for municipal water systems. Two of these water lines were installed in 1958; this type of line typically lasts 40 years. Based on equivalent water lines in the City, we do anticipate problems in the near future. Staff also analyzes fire protection within a neighborhood; fire hydrants located at Schaefer Road and from Vernon Avenue serve Schaefer Circle. The City's Fire Marshal suggests a fire hydrant be installed at the end of the cul -de -sac to meet today's standards. Staff anticipates that any roadway reconstruction would initiate the installation of a watermain. A water service size increase would also necessitate a larger watermain; this could be required from having a substantial home remodeling or if a new home is constructed. May 5, 2005 Page 2 Schaefer Circle — Resident Ur 4 We have analyzed three different options to address the pavement issue. The options are: Option 1: Do nothing — This involves minimally maintaining the roadway, filling potholes, etc. Due to the current state of the roadway we would anticipate a total reconstruction within five years meaning the entire roadway would need to be removed and replaced. Option 2: Overlay the roadway pavement with an additional 2" pavement — Staff feels that you will start seeing reflective cracking through this pavement within two years and major pavement deterioration within seven years. We would anticipate driveway drainage issues at 6208 and 6201. A reconstruction would be needed in 2012. However, this type of reconstruction would not be as severe as Option 1, since the materials below the pavement will have been protected by the overlay and will not need to be removed and replaced. Option 3: Reconstruct the roadway: This type of reconstruction would be similar to Option 2 where the materials below the pavement would remain and only the pavement would be replaced. The costs for these three options were analyzed from a life cycle cost point of view. We used a 40 -year life, 3% inflation, 100% assessments for the reconstruction and any mill and overlays for all 3 options. We have also reviewed the duration of the project with contractors familiar with Edina; this would be for any work anticipated in 2005. The results of these three options are: We would like to know your opinion of these three options. Please complete and return the attached survey by 4:30 PM on Tuesday, May 10. 1 apologize for the quick survey turn- around. Please contact me at 952 - 826 -0443 or at if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer C: Mayor & Edina City Council Steve Lillehaug — City of Edina Total Roadway Option Project Description Cost to 2005 Assessment Duration of homeowners Cost per Home construction - 2005 over 40 ears 1 Do Nothing $150,400 0 0 2 Overlay Pavement $134,400 $3,200 2 days 3 Reconstruct Pavement $109,300 $7,900 4 -5 weeks We would like to know your opinion of these three options. Please complete and return the attached survey by 4:30 PM on Tuesday, May 10. 1 apologize for the quick survey turn- around. Please contact me at 952 - 826 -0443 or at if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer C: Mayor & Edina City Council Steve Lillehaug — City of Edina PRELIMINARY /PENDING ASSESSMENT ROLL SCHAEFER CIRCLE IMPROVEMENT S -217 CITY OF EDINA STREET PID # LEGAL STREET NO. OWNER LOT BLOCK LOTS ASSESSMENT COST A Schaefer Cir 31- 117 -21- 14-0020 6 1 6216 Walsh, James, Helen, & Mary 1 $ 7,900.00 31- 117 -21- 14-0070 7 & pt8 1 6212 Gaarder, Timothy 1 $ 7,900.00 31- 117 -21- 14-0023 pte 1 6208 Gaasedelen, James & Claudia 1 $ 7,900.00 31- 117 -21- 14-0024 9 1 6204 Hardg, Paul & Mari 1 $ 7,900.00 31- 117 -21 -41-0023 13 1 6201 Lasky, Michael 1 $ 7,900.00 31- 117 -21 -41-0024 14 1 6209 Totall Gary& Helen 1 $ 7,900.00 31- 117 -21- 41-0025 15 1 6213 Hasbargen, Donald & Terese 1 $ 7,900.00 31- 117 -21 -41-0026 18 1 6217 Jung, Klaus & Jody 1 $ 7,900.00 8 $ 63,200.00 TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 63,200.00 AVERAGE COST PER LOT $ 7,900.00 A-217 AssessmentiWeas6Yay Page 1 524 PMY1212005 AGENDA ITEM: II.A. May 5, 2005 City of Edina Schaefer Circle Area Residents Edina, Minnesota RE: Resident Letter No. 4 Schaefer Circle City of Edina, Improvement No. A -217 Dear Resident: The Edina City Council has continued the Public Hearing for the above project until May 17, at 7:00 PM in the Edina City Council Chambers. At the April 19th Public Hearing the City Council requested staff to analyze the cost to overlay the existing roadway. Issues that were heard by the Council at the Public Hearing included the following: 1. Why is there such a pressing need for this project? 2. Can the roadway be overlayed with a layer of pavement? And at what cost? 3. Why does the water system need to be revised? 4. How long would the project be an inconvenience? The history of the project started when the adjoining neighborhood was seal coated in 2000- 2001. Public Works staff felt that this pavement was beyond its useful life. A couple of the residents within the cul -de -sac asked, "Why the roadway was not seal coated ?" After learning that the pavement is beyond normal maintenance, the residents agreed with our street department staff that the roadway should be placed on our reconstruction list. Fall of 2004, engineering staff proposed a very aggressive roadway reconstruction schedule for the City, due to how fast the pavements are deteriorating. If a roadway is constructed to current standards, we anticipate the roadway to last 35 to 55 years. Our current practice or strategy for City roadways is to seal coat the roadway every seven years and mill and overlay every 20 years. Given the amount of time between major reconstructions, it makes sense to review and update all City owned utilities. The gas company will also update their utilities when a roadway is reconstructed. The existing water system consists of a two - 1'/2' and one — 1'/4" pipes that serve 7 homes. The Minnesota Department of Health requires a minimum of a 6" watermain for municipal water systems. Two of these water lines were installed in 1958; this type of line typically lasts 40 years. Based on equivalent water lines in the City, we do anticipate problems in the near future. Staff also analyzes fire protection within a neighborhood; fire hydrants located at Schaefer Road and from Vernon Avenue serve Schaefer Circle. The City's Fire Marshal suggests a fire hydrant be installed at the end of the cul -de -sac to meet today's standards. Staff anticipates that any roadway reconstruction would initiate the installation of a watermain. A water service size increase would also necessitate a larger watermain; this could be required from having a substantial home remodeling or if a new home is constructed. City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 ff May 5, 2005 Page 2 Schaefer Circle — Resident Ltr 4 We have analyzed three different options to address the pavement issue. The options are: Option 1: Do nothing — This involves minimally maintaining the roadway, filling potholes, etc. Due to the current state of the roadway we would anticipate a total reconstruction within five years meaning the entire roadway would need to be removed and replaced. Option 2: Overlay the roadway pavement with an additional 2" pavement — Staff feels that you will start seeing reflective cracking through this pavement within two years and major pavement deterioration within seven years. We would anticipate driveway drainage issues at 6208 and 6201. A reconstruction would be needed in 2012. However, this type of reconstruction would not be as severe as Option 1, since the materials below the pavement will have been protected by the overlay and will not need to be removed and replaced. Option 3: Reconstruct the roadway: This type of reconstruction would be similar to Option 2 where the materials below the pavement would remain and only the pavement would be replaced. The costs for these three options were analyzed from a life cycle cost point of view. We used a 40 -year life, 3% inflation, 1000/6 assessments for the reconstruction and any mill and overlays for all 3 options. We have also reviewed the duration of the project with contractors familiar with Edina; this would be for any work anticipated in 2005. The results of these three options are: We would like to know your opinion of these three options. Please complete and return the attached survey by 4:30 PM on Tuesday, May 10. 1 apologize for the quick survey turn- around. Please contact me at 952 - 826 -0443 or at if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer C: Mayor & Edina City Council Steve Lillehaug — City of Edina Total Roadway Option Project Description Cost to 2005 Assessment Duration of homeowners Cost per Home construction - 2005 over 40 ears 1 Do Nothing $150,400 1 0 1 0 2 Overlay Pavement $134,400 $3,200 2 days 3 Reconstruct Pavement $109,300 $7,900 4 -5 weeks We would like to know your opinion of these three options. Please complete and return the attached survey by 4:30 PM on Tuesday, May 10. 1 apologize for the quick survey turn- around. Please contact me at 952 - 826 -0443 or at if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer C: Mayor & Edina City Council Steve Lillehaug — City of Edina w e Survey and Comment Sheet No. 2 Schaefer Circle Improvement No. A -217, CITY OF EDINA Please complete the following survey and comment sheet and return it either to the Engineering Department or in the enclosed stamped envelope to our office by 4:30 PM Tuesday, May 10, 2005. Please contact Wayne Houle at 952 - 826 -0443 if you have any questions. Option 1: Do nothing — This involves minimally maintaining the roadway, filling potholes, etc. Due to the current state of the roadway we would anticipate a total reconstruction within five years meaning the entire roadway would need to be removed and replaced. Option 2: Overlay the roadway pavement with an additional 2" pavement — Staff feels that you will start seeing reflective cracking through this pavement within two years and major pavement deterioration within seven years. We would anticipate driveway drainage issues at 6208 and 6201. A reconstruction would be needed in 2012. However, this type of reconstruction would not be as severe as Option 1 since the materials below the pavement will not need to be removed and replaced. Option 3: Reconstruct the roadway - This type of reconstruction would be similar to Option 2 where the materials below the pavement would remain and only the pavement would be replaced. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • 1. Please rank the preferred option from 1 to 3 with 1 being the most liked. Please rank • • regardless of your answer to the previous question and in order from 1 to 3 (1 being the most • • desirable). • • Option 1- Do nothing • • Option 2 - Overlay the roadway pavement with an additional 2" pavement ; Option 3 - Reconstruct the roadway • • • • Comments: Address: Total Roadway Option Project Description Cost to 2005 Assessment Duration of construction homeowners Cost per Home -2005 over 40 ears 1 Do Nothing $150,400 0 0 2 Overlay Pavement $134,400 $3,200 2 days 3 Reconstruct Pavement $109,300 $7,900 4 -5 weeks • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • 1. Please rank the preferred option from 1 to 3 with 1 being the most liked. Please rank • • regardless of your answer to the previous question and in order from 1 to 3 (1 being the most • • desirable). • • Option 1- Do nothing • • Option 2 - Overlay the roadway pavement with an additional 2" pavement ; Option 3 - Reconstruct the roadway • • • • Comments: Address: >� OORSEY DORSEY & WHITNEY LL? AGENDA ITEM III. A MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Gordon Hughes, City Manager FROM: Jerome P. Gilligan DATE: May 12, 2005 RE: Rescission of Subdivision Moratorium On July 6, 2004 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2004 -09, which imposed a moratorium on subdivisions within Single Family Dwelling Unit District (R -1) while the City conducted a study of its present subdivision ordinance. The moratorium is in effect until July 6, 2005, the one year anniversary of the passage of Ordinance No.2004 -09, unless earlier terminated by the City Council. The moratorium was imposed under the authority contained in Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.355, subdivision 4, which authorizes the City to enact an interim ordinance which may regulate, restrict or prohibit any use, development or subdivision within the City or a portion thereof if it is conducting a study or has authorized a study or is considering amendment to its comprehensive plan or zoning or subdivision ordinance. Prior to considering the first reading of Ordinance No. 2004 -09, the City Council adopted a resolution authorizing the study of the City's subdivision ordinance. A task force was appointed to conduct the study and make recommendations concerning the subdivision ordinance. The task force has completed its study and presented its report to the City Council and Planning Commission. In its report the task force recommends that no changes be made to the subdivision ordinance. At a work session on May 3, 2005, the City Council met with members of the task force and the Planning Commission to discuss the task force's study and recommendation and accepted the task force's report. Under Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.355, subdivision 4, the moratorium on subdivisions may only remain in place while the City is conducting a study on subdivisions or considering amendments to the subdivision ordinance. An ordinance has been prepared for consideration by the City Council at its meeting on May 17th rescinding the subdivision moratorium. If the City Council determines to follow the task force's recommendation and not consider at this time any amendments to the subdivision ordinance, I recommend that the ordinance rescinding the subdivision moratorium be adopted with the second reading waived so that it can take effect immediately. DORSEY & WHITNEY LL° ORDINANCE NO. 2005 -04 AN ORDINANCE RESCINDING THE MORATORUIM ON PLATTING, REPLATTING OR SUBDIVISION OF LOTS AND OTHER PROPERTY WITHIN THE SINGLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT (R -1) IN THE CITY OF EDINA THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. The moratorium on platting, replatting or subdivision of lots and other property within the Single Dwelling Unit District (R -1) within the City of Edina, enacted by Edina Ordinance 2004 -09 is hereby rescinded as of the effective date of this ordinance. Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage. First Reading: Second Reading: Publication: Attest May 17, 2005 Waived May 26, 2005 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor n REPORURECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # II. B. From: Craig Larsen . Consent ❑ City Planner Information Only ❑ Date: May 17, 2005 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ®,. To Council Subject: Conditional Use Permit Good Samaritan Church Action ® Motion 5730 Grove Street ❑ Resolution, ° ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Continue public hearing to June 7, 2005. 0 Info /Background: The continuation of the hearing is at the request of the church. The church has waived their right to have a decision within 60 days of application. The extension would last until June 30, 2005. ° a ' o Good Samaritan ted Methodist Chur" 5730 Grove Street Edina, Minnesota 55436 5 -13 -05 952.929.0049 www.good.org Mr. Craig Larsen City Planner City of Edina 4801 West 50`h Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Larsen; We respectfully request a continuance on our application for a conditional use permit from the Edina City Council meeting scheduled for May 17th, 2005 to the meeting scheduled June 7'''2005. Accordingly we are requesting.an extension for a city council decision on the 60 day period from our application for hearing. We request the extension be valid through June 30m' 2005. Sincerely, Tony Mitche Good Samaritan United Methodist Church Building Committee Member Cc; Mr. Gordon Hughes REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # Ill. C. From: ° Craig Larsen Consent ❑ City Planner Information Only ❑ Date: May 17, 2005 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Preliminary Plat Approval Action ❑ Motion The Blake School and City of Hopkins ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: The Planning Commission recommends plat approval. Staff would recommend granting preliminary and final plat approval. Info /Background: Four votes are required to grant final approval. See attached memo from Jerry Gilligan. Also refer to: Planning Commission minutes, staff report, plat, Hopkins City Council minutes and correspondence. >� OORSEY DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Gordon Hughes, City Manager FROM: Jerome P. Gilligan DATE: May 12, 2005 RE: Plat of The Blake School At the meeting on May 17th the City Council will be considering a proposed plat of The Blake School ("Blake"). The City has been advised by representatives of Blake that as part of a settlement with Hennepin County relating to the expansion of Excelsior Boulevard on the north side of Blake's Hopkins campus, the City of Hopkins has agreed to convey to Blake a strip of land, along the southerly border of the Blake campus. The strip of land being conveyed is a part of the abandoned street car right of way. The land is owned by Hopkins but is within the Edina city limits. In connection with the conveyance, it is necessary to replat the strip of land being conveyed to Blake since it is part of a larger parcel. Since a portion of the property being replatted is within Edina, Edina's approval is required. Blake has proposed that the strip of land it is acquiring be platted as an outlot. Under the Edina zoning code an outlot is not a buildable lot. Blake has informed the City that it has no plans at this time for the development of the outlot or the property in Edina immediately south of a portion of the outlot which Blake acquired last year. Any development of such property for school purposes would require the issuance by the City of a conditional use permit. The development of any portion of Blake's property in Edina is not a matter before the City at this time. It is my understanding that Hopkins is reserving an easement for the path and for underground utilities located on the property it is conveying to Blake and at this time the use of such property will not change. I recommend that the City Council approve the platting of the strip of land as an outlot. As noted previously, any development of Blake's property in Edina for school purposes would require issuance by the City of a conditional use permit and consideration of any such development of Blake's property in Edina is not a matter before the Council at this time. /Ijb DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP Larkin Hoffman ATTORNEYS May 3, 2005 Mr. Craig Larsen Planning Director City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1330 Re: Preliminary and Final Plat for The Blake School Our File #24,635 -00 Dear Mr. Larsen: larldn Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd 1500 Wells Fargo Plaza 7900 Xerxes Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431 -1194 GENERAL: 952-835-3800 FAX: 952- 896 -3333 WEB: www.larlonhoffman.com The City Attorney asked that I provide correspondence to you explaining the reason the Blake School is platting property in the City of Edina. The Blake School entered into a settlement agreement with Hennepin County to resolve claims related to the expansion of Excelsior Boulevard (Highway 7) immediately north and adjoining The Blake School Campus. The school desired to exchange land for land, and the City of Hopkins agreed to convey land owned by the city along the school's southerly border. This land is contained within the parcel known as the former trolley line property shown on the plat as Outlot A. Outlot A is included on the Certificate of Title with other property owned by the City of Hopkins that will not be transferred to The Blake School. Therefore, to facilitate the conveyance of the property as required by the purchase agreement with the City of Hopkins, it is necessary to plat the outlot to create a separate legal lot. At this time,,The Blake School has no plans for the property and has agreed to retain an easement for the trail and public utilities over the subject property. I hope this addresses questions raised in the public hearing process. If there are further questions, please feel free to call me at 952- 896 -3290. Si e y, � liam C. ffith, for Lar n Hoffinan Daly & Lindgren Ltd. Direct Dial: (952) 896 -3290 Direct Fax: (952) 842 -1729 Email: wgriffith@larkinhoffinan.com Mr. Craig Larsen May 3, 2005 Page 2 cc: Margaret Jadin, The Blake School John Barnes, Sunde Land Surveying Thomas F. Alexander, Esq. Jerry Gilligan, Dorsey & Whitney 1009166.1 w Q z 0 CO a� x w Q x w J U W c z LOCATI. . MAP L�JL MENDELSSOHN LN Subject Site Edina Overview S -05 -1 The Blake School City of Hopkins DRAFT MINUTES PC MEETING MARCH 30, 2005 S -05 -1 The Blake School City of Hopkins West of Blake Road and north of Belmore Lane Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the City of Hopkins has agreed to sell a 75 -foot wide strip of land to The Blake School. The land extends westerly along the south side of school property for approximately 1,300 feet. The sale is in consideration for land acquired by the City for recent improvements to excelsior Boulevard. The land is in the City of Edina but is owned by the City of Hopkins. Mr. Griffith was present representing Blake School and interested neighbors were also present. Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends of the proposed subdivision. The sale will not change the function of the land for public use. The City of Edina has not utilities affected by the sale. Commissioner Lonsbury asked Mr. Larsen if this request also triggers a Conditional Use Permit. Mr. Larsen said not at this time. He explained if in the future the school decides to use this strip of land for school use they would have to come before the City with an application for a Conditional Use Permit. Commissioner Grabiel asked for clarification on the reason this is being heard by Edina when it is a sale of property. Mr. Larsen explained it is not only a sale of the property but a re -plat of the Blake School property to incorporate this strip of land along with the changes that occurred along Excelsior Boulevard with land taking. ' Mr. Larsen said both municipalities (Edina, Hopkins) hear this replat. Commissioner Fischer acknowledged this is a very peculiar piece of land and questioned how this strip "came about ". Mr. Larsen explained years ago when streetcars became obsolete the streetcar right -of -ways were made available for sale. Some right of ways were added to lot whiles others were sold. When this strip became available the City of Hopkins purchased it. Chair. Workinger questioned who maintains this strip of land. Mr. Larsen responded the City of Hopkins presently maintains the strip of land. Mr. Bill Griffith addressed the Commission and explained Blake School plans to retain the strip of land as it exists today. He explained the strip of land borders the south property line of the Blake campus and the City of Hopkins has agreed to sell this strip to the school to offset the taking of Blake School property when Excelsior Boulevard was redesigned. Mr. Bob Anthony, 301 Griffith, told the Commission he has a concern not so much with this strip of land, but the larger piece of land purchased by Blake School. Mr. Anthony said his concern is with paragraph 4 of Exhibit B, which mentions landscaped area, playing fields, and sidewalks, and wondered if that reference is for the strip of land or for the property Blake purchased called `Blake Heights ". Chair Workinger asked Mr. Larsen if any building could occur on this strip of land. Mr. Larsen responded probably not. He pointed out if any changes were to be made ,to the strip of land or any other piece of land in Edina owned by Blake School the Blake School would have to appear before the Commission and Council with a Conditional Use Permit application. Mr. Griffth said when the land purchase agreement was drafted it was believed that strip of land was in the City of Hopkins. Continuing, Mr. Griffith pointed out the strip of land in question is replatted as an Outlot and Outlots, at least to the best of his knowledge, are considered unbuildable in the City of Edina. Mr. Larsen acknowledged there might be some confusion with regard to this request. He explained to the Commission Mr. Anthony in his letter is also referring to five replatted residential lots on Griffi that received Commission and Council approval a couple years ago. At that time approval was granted to allow construction of five new single - family homes. Recently the developer and owner of the plat known as "Blake Heights" sold the 5 -lot plat to Blake School. After purchase The Blake School withdrew the five -lot residential plat with the understanding if they want to develop this land in any other way they would have to appear before the Commission and Council to do so. Mr. Larsen stressed future use of development of this strip of land and other land in Edina owned by Blake School is not a matter before the Commission at this time. Mr. Stevens, 304 Dearborn Street told the Commission his concern is that vehicles or buses would drive on that strip of land. Chair Workinger commented if he understands correctly, at least at this point in time any change to the strip of land would require hearings before both the Commission and Council. Mr. Larsen responded that is correct, adding Blake School is aware of that requirement. Mr. Larsen also noted schools and their activities are permitted conditional uses in the R -1 residential zoning district. Mr. Griffith said it is not the intent of Blake School to use this strip of land as an alley. He reiterated the strip of land will be maintained in its present state. Mr. Buzz Jonason told the Commission at present he is considering purchasing a property on Dearborn Court, adding he is worried about the potential for future school expansion noting he has no idea what the intentions of the school actually are. Mr. Jonason said this strip of land grants them direct access to their residential lots in Edina. Ms. Guandrrame, 302 Dearborn, told the Commission Blake is a very noisy school with activities going on at all hours, adding with the school encroaching further into Edina and closer to her property that she doesn't feel safe. A resident at 305 Harrison told the Commission she wants to echo what her neighbors have been saying this evening, which is, their concern that the school appears to be encroaching further into their residential neighborhood. Commissioner Fischer moved to recommend division approval subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Grabiel seconded the motion. Commissioner Fischer noted in his experience most trail way systems have agreements in place that protect their use as trail ways and questioned if this trail way has such an agreement. Mr. Larsen said to the best of his knowledge, this "path" does not have such an agreement. He said the replatting as an Outlot prevents building on the site or change in its present use. Commissioner Brown commented this appears confusing and asked where the jurisdiction actually lies. Mr. Larsen said at this time jurisdiction is with both municipalities, but if the use of this Outlot changes only the City of Edina would be involved. Mr. Larsen said this evening the Commission is only being requested to recommend approval of a replat. Mr. Larsen added staff has recommended approval with no knowledge on what, if anything, The Blake School plans to do with this Outlot or with their other property in Edina in the future. Commissioner Grabiel said it appears to him, at least at this time, the proposal before the Commission this evening is for a replat of a 17 -foot wide strip of land by adding it to the Blake School property. The Outlot designation of the strip of land prevents the Blake School from changing its use without first coming before the Commission and Council. Mr. Grabiel noted the Blake School has been at this location for many years. Chair Workinger called for the vote. All voted aye; motion carried. o e Regular Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, March 30,2005,7:00 PM Edina City Hall Council Chambers 4801 West 50th Street Case Number: S -05 -1 Location: West of Blake Road and north of Belmore Lane. Applicants: City of Hopkins and The Blake School Request: The City of Hopkins has agreed to sell a 75 -foot wide strip of land to The Blake School. The land extends westerly along the south side of school property for approximately 1,300 feet. The sale is partially in consideration for land acquired by the City for recent improvements to Excelsior Boulevard. Although the land is in Edina it is owned by the City of Hopkins. City Action: Approval of Subdivision. Issues: This strip of land is part of the abandoned streetcar right of way. The City of Hopkins would reserve easements for the existing path and existing underground utilities within this parcel. (see attached Exhibit B from purchase agreement). Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the proposed Subdivision. The sale will not change the function of the land for public use. The City of Edina has no utilities affected by the sale. EXHIBIT B Permitted Encumbrances: 1. All easements reserved in and all memorials shown on Hennepin County Registrar of Titles Certificate of Title No. 518875. 2. At closing, the Seller shall reserve and retain permanent easements for any underground public utilities located on the Property, including, but not limited to, city water, sewer and storm sewer. The City shall retain a 40 -foot wide easement for the 12 -inch underground waterline located on the Property and 20 -foot wide easements for any underground storm sewer lines. 3. At closing, the City shall also reserve and retain a 20 -foot wide permanent public trail easement, the centerline of which will Woe location of the existing public trail located on the Property. The City will also reserve and retain an easement over the Property for access to the public trail easement. The public trail easement will permit Buyer to re -align portions of the public trail and the trail easement but only in connection with the expansion of Buyer's school campus to a location south of the Property, and subject to the following terms and conditions: a. Buyer may realign the public trail and trail easements only within that part of the Property lying between the easterly and westerly property lines, as such easterly and westerly lines are extended northerly across the Property, of such adjacent land that is acquired by Buyer at any time, which is located south of the Property and on which Buyer's school campus is to be expanded (such adjacent land acquired by Buyer being hereinafter referred to as the "Expansion Property "). b. Buyer shall replace all trees removed as a result of such trail realignment with trees of the same species and reasonable size, restore all vegetation damaged as a result of such trail relocation and install landscaping, trees or vegetation along the realigned trail substantially comparable to the trees, landscaping and vegetation that existed prior to realignment of the trail. Subject to Buyer's permitted uses described in Paragraph 4 of this Exhibit B, such replacement and restoration shall be completed within an area that is 50 feet in width and centered on the actual centerline of the improved trail. The trail relocation will be done at Buyer's sole expense and the new trait alignment must be such that it will not create a safety hazard, unreasonably interfere with the use of the public trail, or fail to comply with established trail construction standards. 4. At closing, Buyer shall grant a conservation easement to Seller over all of the Property, requiring that the Property be left in its natural condition. As an exception, at such time as Buyer acquires the Expansion Property and has obtained approval for expansion of Buyer's school campus to the Expansion Property, Buyer shalt be entitled to use portions of the Property for landscaped areas, playing fields, underground utilities, sidewalks and one (1) north -south access drive, but only in connection with the expansion of Buyer's school campus to the Expansion Property, and'subject to the following terms and conditions: c:Hopdv%VacantLdPA.Blake 7 of 8 a. In no event shall Buyer be entitled to use any part of the Property for a parking lot or for an east -west driveway. b. Such uses by Buyer shall be limited to that part of the Property lying between the easterly and westerly property lines of the Expansion Property, as such easterly and westerly lines are extended northerly across the Property. C. Buyer shall restore all trees, vegetation and landscaping located on the Property and damaged or disturbed as a result of Buyer's construction activities to a condition substantially comparable to that that existed prior to performance of such construction activities, except in areas where Buyer installs playing fields, sidewalks or a north -south access drive as permitted by this Paragraph 4. 0 c:HopdAVacantLdPA.Blake 8 of 8 1 o, Le DATE: March 25, 2005 MEMORANDUM CITY OF EDINA TO: Craig Larsen — City Planner FROM: Wayne Houle — City Engineer / Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Parcel ID 3011721120001 — City of Hopkins Engineering has reviewed this parcel as shown below and request that a public easement remain on the the pedestrian trail along with proper easements for the existing storm sewer along Spruce Road. Thanks r_ �..i.T.►,a a .i Larkin Homan ATTORNEYS April 20, 2005 Mr. Craig Larsen City Planner City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Larldn Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd 1500 Wells Fargo Plaza 7900 Xerxes Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431 -1194 GENERAL: 952-835-3800 FAX: 952 -896 -3333 WEB: www.larldnhoffman.com Re: City Of Hopkins City Council Minutes regarding Subdivision Approval for the Blake School; Our File #24,635 -00 Dear Mr. Larsen: Enclosed are the minutes from the City of Hopkins April 4, 2004 City Council meeting confirming that the City of Hopkins (the "City ") has approved the Preliminary and Final Plats for the Blake School Subdivision. As you will read in the minutes, there was some discussion regarding the location of an underground water main. Specifically, the approval of Outlot D was subject to: (1) the City and the Blake School agreeing on financing the survey work for locating the underground water main; and (2) locating the underground water main. The City and Blake School have subsequently agreed on financing for the survey work and that work is being completed. Please feel free to contact me with any questions regarding the City's approval of the Blake School's Preliminary and Final Plats. 2elSiy, Griffith, for Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd. Direct Dial: (952) 896 -3290 Direct Fax: (952) 842 -1729 Email: wwiffith .larkinhoffinan.com Enclosures cc: Margaret Jadin John Barnes 1005963.1 The Council discussed the color scheme and asked if SuperValu has plans for updating the exterior look of their buildings. A special Council meeting will be held April 13th at 7:30 to review a plan for expansion to the east. A special Zoning and Planning Commission Meeting is scheduled pril 12 to review plans for an east side expansion. City Attorney, Jerry Steiner, said that the Council would b a position to vote on the east or the south expansion plan on Wednesday, the 13th. Council Member Brausen asked if staff could veri t the two meetings next week will be broadcast on cable. Council Member Rowan moved and Coun ember Johnson seconded a motion to continue Resolution 2005 -18, approvin a plan to construct an addition to the building at 300 2 "d Ave S to Wednesday, April . A poll of the vote was as follows: Council Member Brausen, aye; Council Me r Rowan, aye; Council Member Johnson, aye; Mayor Maxwell, aye. The motio ried unanimously. 2. Height Variance, rValu (CR2005 -026) The Zoning Ordinance s a maximum height of 35 feet. SuperValu is proposing to construct a 120,000 re -foot addition to the existing building with a height of 43 feet. A variance of eight fe needed. Council Memb wan moved and Council Member Brausen seconded a motion to continue Res on 2005 -019, approving a height variance for the addition to SuperValu to Wednesda ril 13th. A poll of the vote was as follows: Council Member Brausen, aye; Council er Rowan, aye; Council Member Johnson, aye; Mayor Maxwell, aye. The motion led unanimously. at 8:35 p.m. The P.m. . NEW BUSINESS 1. Preliminary/final Plat, Blake School (CR2005 -043) As part of the agreement with the reconstruction of Excelsior Boulevard, the City will deed property to Blake School. The property is located on the south side of the school. There is a 30 -foot strip that is in the City of Hopkins and a larger piece that is in the City of Edina. The City of Hopkins will be adding the 30 -foot strip in Hopkins to Blake's property. The larger parcel in Edina will become an outlot. The City of Edina will take action on the larger parcel. In addition to the area south of Blake School, there will be several parcels of land in Interlachen that were the former trolley car line that will be platted as outlots and April 5,2005 City Council Meeting Minutes Page 4 retained by the City, except for outlot D that was recently purchased from the City. Outlots are unbuildable. City Attorney, Jerry Steiner stated that Outlot A, the property in Edina, is subject to the restrictions in the City's agreement with Blake; the conservation easement, no building, and left in its natural condition except for certain limited exceptions; and cannot be built on. Mr. Steiner also mentioned a utility easement for an underground water main. The City does not know the actual location of the main, so approval should be conditional upon on verifying the location of the water main. The easement would be moved if the location of the main is not where it is thought to be. Steve Stadler stated that Blake School would be locating the water main. The Zoning and Planning Commission recommended approval. The action is in compliance with the Zoning Ordinance, Comprehensive Plan, and the Subdivision Ordinance. Bill Griffith, representing Blake School, came forward and stated that Blake is agreeable to providing the easement. The location of the main was not discussed and Mr. Griffith stated that the City should be responsible for that. A private locator would have to be hired to find the main. Mr. Steiner stated that in the City's agreement with Blake, it states that Blake will provide a survey locating underground utilities. Mr. Griffith stated that the utilities are not easily located and that was not an anticipated cost. Blake will continue to discuss the easement with staff and how to make it happen. Mr. Steiner said that the City should not close on the property until this is settled. There is no authority to spend funds on a location of the utilities. Council Member Johnson moved and Council Member Brausen seconded a motion to adopt Resolution 2005 -030, approving a preliminary/final plat for the Blake School and platting several parcels to become outlots that will be owned by the City except for outlot D subject to finding the water main and having the City and City Attorney and Blake School come to an agreement on how to finance the location of the main. A poll of the vote was as follows: Council Member Brausen, aye; Council Member Rowan, aye; Council Member Johnson, aye; Mayor Maxwell, aye. The motion carried unanimously. The Mizpah Church is proposing to construct a new sign on their pro 2 5�' Ave N. The site is zoned R-4. All signs over 12 square feet require . iti nal use permit. The Zoning and Planning Commission recommended a Nancy Anderson reviewed the site I specifications of the sign. Council Member Br ved and Council IS4ember Rowan seconded a motion to adopt Resolution 20 - s v t ws: Council Member Brausen, aye; Council Member Rowan, April 5,2005 City Council Meeting Minutes Page 5 April 12, 2005 Craig Larsen, Edina Planning Re: Blake School acquisition from Hopkins Dear Mr. Larsen: I attended the City Council meeting on March 30 and voiced my concern regarding the trolley trail and the property Blake school purchased in my neighborhood. One of the council members commented that "we knew we were moving into a neighborhood with Blake school and that the school was here first ". This is true, however Blake has expanded its' campus in the past several years which changes the dynamics of the neighborhood. They added a running track, soccer fields, playground, baseball diamonds, tennis courts, and a large stadium with a huge parking lot which required removal of many trees leaving the houses located next door exposed to parked cars overlooking their back yards- -noise levels have increased because of competitive sports being played on these fields, and traffic and pollution are at a all time high. Now, they are moving further into our neighborhood by purchasing land that was previously zoned as residential. I wish you would come out and look at this land so you could see the acres of woods with one small house in the center that they plan to us as a parking lot. I would love to give you a tour of that particular parcel, the trolley line and of all the additions Blake has made in the past 5 or 6 years. Please keep in mind our privacy rights, our property values, and our property tax base. Our concern is real, and we deserve to be treated as equal residents of Edina even though we are on the Hopkins and Edina property line. Please call me as I would love to show you first -hand where our concerns lie. You need to see this before they remove all the trees. Thank you C,�CtZ/o %; OPv"XQ- Charlotte Stevens 952- 931 -9503 304 Dearborn Court Edina, Mn. 55343 Ruben P. Anthony; 1%= hnft 61 a 435 3769 e�,ueilyen,lwwyrobtplUp eihopu�uun, March 28, 2005 Fax to Craig Larsen,. Edina Planning Re: Hlake School Acqu(aitlon from Hopkins 10 l oritlh Mtnel Aver M,. Larson; Thank you for your infbtmalion on the above. This is the first I've, seen ot-the purchase agivement (Lxhlblt B). I was unable w get a of it at the Hopinns council rlleetinb of September 31''. Births that meeting I'm still trying to understand why the ".,ion of Excelsior Boulevard, a county road, effects the city of Iiopkins for land relinquished by Blake School. I gave glen to flfteen minute objection to the acquisition of the trail at this meeting and all 1 got In the "W*s was three line. This transfer will chattge the look and feel of our trail used try countless walkers and jvgsous by �'c "1OV"'8 ueoa and natural growth f%om the`•notthern 25' and could bring the expansion of the Blake athletic.9eld that much closer to the trail. Paragraph 4 of Exhibit mentions obtaining, approval of the Bxpagslon Property (formerly Blake 1146110) as a school campus as if the hrea has been rezoned. The mOation of landscaped areas, pla*8 fields, and sidewalks in reference to the propert.' is transferred to the Expansion property by paragraph 41. The Expansion Property is adjacent to I3dina single fhmily residences on the west and south eides. loud speakers has increased many fold. vaGy . Any activity to the west in the msity increase is'no different than being on you and the council to deny the Since Blake School expended its athlatic field the noisp from the shouting and To move this 25' closer; bn the nosh side of My property is an invasion of pri "Expansion Property" Ober than sirOe family, dwellings is unthinkable, The d invaded by an apattmM4 complex or a reststtrant with s liquor license. I call approval and acceptance called for on sheet I of 1,116 Sunda plat. Please give tho extra M.copy to the council. Thank you. &Inca R. P FOR cc: Karon Lundhulm N ® D {0 IQI ti nmT I I �r I � . IBC_ I � _ b /n rare C� C •� alf-, Y —wJ t rs+c�'ir'i �h A-/ w.lr 6sv d -giia r L -Adam L-WIP AEAr C FVWV f2'l /7 0.44.w Btu`• lA.. 1 'wy ". ar' � " D a rwei°.c "` :I i8 rLI V ' ; ',,!"I i � (C j J ` c� ( Y -, � V � J I;z+a ama n.c i M /'fa77'1F /L7r� �M Q �Y.IIN b{ a M w 1'1 O ------------------------------------ - LOT 1 D i Vol Q Or�o.rm0®rrd r d.®9 rw. r r I...rr. rr..u. rIr ..r. r Aam r r .a...rar .r.r M r ..An.rnr r r tear •Yr Cr. a rr..m. r r r• r r r r....r rr r trot. �r r rdr a �r.rr...rr.rrwr..rrrrrrrr.q {vrrrr...,�r dr {rr. a rear. Aam rd.. r .ey IN r tarry rr. y. r r rn r..r r tl �q rr rmL .say. r b 9 I I u Dr (iD e� {L ry.I/A f2D r r r ..a Ir I..... -= f�faf r c..L Arc. {Harr r...w m Irr c-ft .rrr r.r. r r W acct .. r . w react rr..I...r errbab�.rrr.arrrY rnotrrY. l.rarrrllr a. 9� ISM rserID 1r ..0 ..or rr ra nurrrrarrlr n.�ry{rrr.r.rts.{..rr cry r.r. wr.rr.rrr/rrcp r.rrrrr.rsla{ �� ir.w>irtr.er err saryrr.r rrrr.rvdrrrrrrry . r rerrrr. rr.rQ Vr. =I.�b stfr�rm�pl (4 rr1 (ft r.r(N rr llOrrr rrr(I.)rww(.1 mr(.1a ml MwMMrrMrr wlrw.pr).rr r�a.w err. sr,r rrr r-aL— �r r.rrrryrwro.irrrrwrr c..y I�� r �(u�rr(N1w.(W.+rrfn.rw•.(mi1+r( tar. rr< mr. w. rrOgrr�rer.. �tirrr +r..rrr.r.arr.r.rrrrrre..rrrr i W M.r trb _ eater rr. (q �plwr.r fblrrr. r{ r.,sNrr�r.Mrr.rrrrrrrrrr..µrrer rrrrarrrx...p.rorrr . r. •.ZI tar.( �r.�..aw(D)rwlr.rrfYi.N.aY.br.. rrr .rrr�.YrOr ■r.rrrrr♦rrrr.I....r er.y �V f ^I r r 1{m r r rl Yb! 6rM r w 1. r r r IOm r r �1 YY 1 r.y { w A. a! WfIYOb tLI1R u a cry {car. r a r..r. e� Irmr 4�j b e rrr :rrr (rrrr Or1. r rr L Trry In. Ire m o. r ..e r.r ryr..d_ r tr.y r r w.by.NY. r rrr./ cry er W r. M r r r .rrr oatr r w t{ I. t u �y rrrr A.b r Ae r M r r rr rr �V to. — r r...y r r wry cart r drr cry w ✓r ){ r r W .rerr er.r r w It r. { ...r'. r.rhr P.r r Q 1.r.mr...l nlr..tl�r4r r. rw.t L L.rb'.rw.MrrrrVwr. /. ►h.�yr..r.a A.{r.r.�rywrwi� >•r rr.rrr rr... BLOCK SEE SHEET 2 FOR EXISTING FEATURES er fray w.rtNy Owt thr b w Cw and asst eM bid %m It d A* ar d U. bzer d I� d t..anyt N mt 6r s m am bid 1 Dad ehb 256 d" d P.rusr 2067 Li SLIDE LAID SURVE"K LL6 4 Op yI A.M K Nsn.t 0.LL YYn Ng Nr IMSd ti c .c v �_ m L 9m. /n ON" DLO -A-- A1O I ss rrmot L:J•:A'�� :� :5 9 MWArN'/ /SEEP rL 8 r I � 1•) Nad d ..y and —t 1br d—1 d b LL. Pmdr Dw. N. 70=40 s{ d.cm h— m dnabd b pfd d.s.r...t abq rm. ea.r.afar r add dernrd abt k d Can Ir .1 Mb. C.et! N4h.W D pwt—L T. ad hdT d (..eet.d) Tys Aar. and tr art 50 tr d r Sa.eh.r O.sr .. tM SaID..mt WatQ d S.etl.n 10 I s. rot Yb.arlebdd a add d.a..r.► L) Tr deeblbn d Paa.I { .mtobW b Naha d W P.r.. Dm N. 5n3W WP.v. t. W b acs. 1) PrWSy r r)m N m AO....mt tar n.as nick.. w Dm Nr 42WM 9 •c ..) This mov"w fr not nrsd my .aadhm d..m..b fs the ..rated .h..y ad dly{ .h.m our tl. bm"" I L) ThN awry .m 1CW. yan . mn0{.t1m d dd. mtd"d by ar .flb ar .Rt-d t. b- d asr.d INc .sL E®..mt& aPPStaN.Nm. "d ,...b— .n" s.m 1. ddfbm t. the r... h— Thb cry r . .a}a t. n *,i n Wm —ot d . —t tfW W.- -M.. t er .ttsn.�. W. pW- Lp� Ord rwh hm hm. p. I. for Nd, yss.dvf i-*AwUm S^" b a!}d y mWm Wm tt.Id r V-9m 7..) Thr r.4 d.e nn.t I.•PSt y r.w. IM p1ly.kd t..hva Wakq m Db I.Watl gnat tm r.... 0. baba tlr .s.Dry prtl.n .1 tM .mJ.a I.WSy' ammUY .and .y thw CNy a NePNba L) Lail f. INw! f - 20Af 5ry SILM Aaa 6 2 2R 0~ 96.3n S4R s10s A- CutW r- ..50o k R s 6167 Aeta .. t 6dbt C _ ..500 Nc R a 6167 Aar MOO 0 - %IW S4 R s 6072 Ass A I F BLOCK SEE SHEET 2 FOR EXISTING FEATURES er fray w.rtNy Owt thr b w Cw and asst eM bid %m It d A* ar d U. bzer d I� d t..anyt N mt 6r s m am bid 1 Dad ehb 256 d" d P.rusr 2067 Li SLIDE LAID SURVE"K LL6 4 Op yI A.M K Nsn.t 0.LL YYn Ng Nr IMSd III a r. XCf rTION .d' ES EXC£ T/ ON p]/ 4r £XC PT /ON II EXCEPIT /ON _— 0' ____l� mIOYrT/ �T =7Ff% AO <O -30u Pfie.s/WN furca 7W8LAKESChtV . F Sunde L.d S.'." ..r . r ...e rr Ir.r nr.d• r ns ti c .c v �_ m L 9m. /n ON" DLO -A-- A1O unm rrmot L:J•:A'�� :� :5 9 MWArN'/ /SEEP gc RO.rO 8 III a r. XCf rTION .d' ES EXC£ T/ ON p]/ 4r £XC PT /ON II EXCEPIT /ON _— 0' ____l� mIOYrT/ �T =7Ff% AO <O -30u Pfie.s/WN furca 7W8LAKESChtV . F Sunde L.d S.'." ..r . r ...e rr Ir.r nr.d• r ns r^�l,li vcsaIA — —' \nr-A '7 ^n a/ A n/rinu I 0f,4, 3L`, ,A. n�i 1-70/ Y L12O Cs D.aata catCh baYl tffi CV D...ta ml.nal aI ba D.aala aatl, bm pia. CM Da , .b. e9uI D—= tY. h,*-t D—ta msaaM garm Sr m omC i4 N /W'57T J uturr Daata pa.s pal./Dpbt pals //.78 \ NI'M'57 r r^�l,li vcsaIA — —' \nr-A '7 ^n a/ A n/rinu I 0f,4, 3L`, ,A. n�i 1-70/ Y L12O Cs D.aata catCh baYl tffi CV D...ta ml.nal aI ba D.aala aatl, bm pia. CM Da , .b. HM 101 D—= tY. h,*-t D—ta msaaM W ELEC DWI Metfe omC i4 D. Ia aabaY anm.nia.lbr Damta paw pals P" Daata pa.s pal./Dpbt pals RCP D.n.ta nMfaad anva. pip. SAN 5 ST S D ..W a.tltsy aaa Daata .Ism a.s TC Da.Na to al aaa.b eN a...ua 116 ELEC Daata aAryaaO .MCrle � WV o.Dia1ta . D—ta at. aM. '.. -laN. W/a aLL WA u W/n alit ul ai. Mimafr rnrtu N b o b L o r iiiiQ SCALE W FEET I I-- -- I° a I.e s un Y 7 j a . n nrla urt •- /— -- ---- - - - - -- — jda L11 - -r -r- —/II I �) 589 Ja /5f- IO OR cf.�slma — — - -- --- ---------- arrur/rpui - - - - -- - - -� -- ------------ - - - - -- --sa {.s J ., r ------------------------------- _ am �d aa® Tall A / r OUTL O A -- - - -- 1 / / /\ [� ^ /—/f i n �i r/rur/rpua -- -- CC [.moll / Y L / / V / ...: L V . • �/ Ipfi/tr'r Da p auwa aID r1Yn FLY Qtaml f1 M �� arst� Lli Olrfa laa A alrurlr.ut /�-� dir; /tom �rvyt� : � N8911J 441w s - WRtolX ROAD 118748 1. - DMAX ROAD " - - -- nrunrrur /A/ Vf7 /Y I N b o b lm iiiiQ SCALE W FEET REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, City Engineer VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: May 17, 2005 AGENDA ITEM IV.A ITEM DESCRIPTION: Contract No. ENG 05 -4, SOUTH HARRIET PARK WEST IMPROVEMENTS, Improvement No. A -204. Companv 1. Midwest Asphalt Corporation 2. Park Construction Company RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Midwest Asphalt Corporation GENERAL INFORMATION: Amount of Quote or Bid $ 1,029,872.15 $ 1,402,478.40 $ 1,029,872.15 This project is for street and utility improvements on Brookview Avenue, Oaklawn Avenue, and Kellogg Avenue from West 54th Street to West 52nd Street including West 52 "d Street and West 53d Street. This project includes reconstructing the existing roadway, rehabilitating the watermain and sanitary sewer, and extending the storm sewer system. A project public hearing was held on February 15th, 2005. This project will be funded by special assessments and respective utility funds. The Feasibility Study cost estimate for the special assessments, that did not include utility upgrades, was $588,000.00; the low bid reflects $466,386.20 for special assessment amount. Staff recommends awarding the project to Midwest Asphalt Corporation. C' Signature The Recommended Bid is X within budget not within I:l Public Works - Engineering Department Finance Director CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY OF EDINA CONTRACT ENG 05-4 CITY OF EDINA IMPROVEMENT NOS. A -204, WM -439, STS -300 AND SS-423 SOUTH HARRIET PARK (WEST) NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION BID OPENING: MAY 10, 2005 11:00 A.M. CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID Midwest Asphalt Corporation $ 1,029,872.15 Hopkins, MN Park Construction Company $ 1,402,478.40 Minneapolis, MN ENGINEERS ESTIMATE $ 1,191,240.00 SOUTH HARRIET PARK (WEST) NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION BID TABULATION CITY OF EDINA CONTRACT NO. ENG 05-4 IMPROVEMENT NOS. A -204, WM-439, STS-300 AND SS-423 BID DATE: MAY 10, 2005 11:00 A.M. SCHEDULE B: STORM SEWER (373-100) Engineers Estimate Midwest Asphalt Corporation Hopkins, MN Park Construction Company Minneapolis, MN NO. I ITEM. NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITS UNIT COST I AMOUNT UNIT COST I AMOUNT UNIT COST I AMOUNT SCHEDULE A. STREET (A -204) REMOVE MANHOLE OR CATCH BASIN 11 1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION 1 LS $35,000.00 $ 35,000.00 $27,000.00 $ 27,000.00 $67,346.00 $ 67,346.00 2 2101.502 CLEARING 9 TREE $225.00 $ 2,025.00 $255.00 $ 2,295.00 $75.00 $ 675.00 3 2101.507 GRUBBING 9 TREE $225.00 $ 2,025.00 $170.00 $ 1,530.00 $25.00 $ 225.00 4 2104.501 REMOVE CURB & GUTTER 20 LF $10.00 $ 200.00 $3.30 $ 66.00 $7.25 $ 145.00 5 2104.503 REMOVE CONCRETE WALK 200 SF $3.00 $ 600.00 $0.50 $ 100.00 $0.78 $ 156.00 6 1 2104.503 IREMOVE STONE RETAINING WALL 100 SF $10.00 $ 1,000.00 $3.75 $ 375.00 $3.00 $ 300.00 7 2104.505 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT 500 SY $6.00 $ 3,000.00 $6.65 $ 3,325.00 $7.45 $ 3,725.00 8 2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 14820 SY $2.25 $ 33,345.00 $1.30 $ 19,266.00 $1.10 $ 16,302.00 9 2104.511 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) 600 LF $6.00 $ 3,600.00 $320 $ 1,920.00 $2.00 $ 1,200.00 10 2104.513 SAWING BIT PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) 1000 LF $3.50 $ 3,500.00 $2.15 $ 2,150.00 $1.80 $ 1,800.00 11 2104.618 SALVAGE STONE RETAINING WALL 200 SF $10.00 $ 2,000.00 $4.25 $ 850.00 $7.00 $ 1,400.00 12 2104.618 SALVAGE BRICK/STONE PAVERS 450 SF $10.00 $ 4,500.00 $320 $ 1,440.00 $3.00 $ 1,350.00 13 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION (LV) 7500 CY $14.00 $ 105,000.00 $10.00 $ 75,000.00 $10.60 $ 79,500.00 14 2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 3730 CY $21.00 $ 78,330.00 $23.50 $ 87,655.00 $25.70 $ 95,861.00 15 2350.501 TYPE MV 4 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (E) 1850 TON $41.00 $ 75,850.00 $43.27 $ 80,049.50 $4120 $ 76,220.00 16 2350.502 TYPE LV 3 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (B) 2000 TON $38.00 $ 76,000.00 $35.25 $ 70,500.00 $34.50 $ 69,000.00 17 2350.505 ITYPE LV4 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (B) (FOR DRIVES AND PATCHINC. 80 TON $90.00 $ 7,200.00 $100.00 $ 8,000.00 $167.00 $ 13,360.00 18 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT 1100 GAL $2.00 $ 2,200.00 $1.80 $ 1,980.00 $2.00 $ 2,200.00 19 2540.618 INSTALL STONE RETAINING WALL 200 SF $25.00 $ 5,000.00 $11.80 $ 2,360.00 $22.40 $ 4,480.00 20 2506.522 ADJUST FRAME 8 RING CASTING 7 EACH $500.00 $ 3,500.00 $280.00 $ 1,960.00 $398.00 $ 2,786.00 21 2521.501 4' CONCRETE WALK 350 SF $5.00 $ 1,750.00 $5.60 $ 1,960.00 $5.75 $ 2,012.50 22 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN SPECIAL 480 LF $16.00 $ 7,680.00 $20.50 $ 9.840.00 $17.20 $ 8,256.00 23 2531.507 6' CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT 500 SY $40.00 $ 20,000.00 $37.30 $ 18,650.00 $41.50 $ 20,750.00 24 2540.618 INSTALL BRICK/STONE PAVERS 450 SF $20.00 $ 9,000.00 $6.65 $ 2,992.50 $7.75 $ 3,487.50 25 2572.502 CLEAN ROOT CUTTING 100 L F $10.00 $ 1,000.00 $5.65 $ 565.00 $5.00 $ 500.00 26 2573.502 SILT FENCE, TYPE MACHINE SLICED 1000 LF $3.50 $ 3,500.00 $1.90 $ 1,900.00 $1.50 $ 1,500.00 27 2573.603 I BIOROLL 260 LF $4.00 $ 1,040.00 $3.80 $ 988.00 $2.95 $ 767.00 28 2573.530 INLET PROTECTION TYPE C 28 EACH $250.00 $ 7,000.00 $63.65 $ 1,782.20 $119.00 $ 3,332.00 29 2575.505 SODDING TYPE LAWN (WITH 6- TOPSOIL) 9900 SY $5.00 $ 49,500.00 $3.90 $ 38,610.00 $5.25 $ 51,975.00 30 2575.513 MULCH MATERIAL TYPE 6 15 C Y $70.00 $ 1,050.00 $31.80 $ 477.00 $30.00 $ 450.00 31 2575.604 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 500 SY $2.50 $ 1,250.00 $1.60 $ 800.00 $1.50 $ 750.00 SUBTOTAL • SCHEDULE A $ 548,845.00 $ 466,38820 $ $31,811.00 SCHEDULE B: STORM SEWER (373-100) 32 2104.501 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM) 990 LF $12.00 $ 11,810.00 $9.65 $ 9,553.50 $6.80 $ 6,732.00 33 2104.509 REMOVE MANHOLE OR CATCH BASIN 11 EACH $350.00 $ 3,850.00 $316.00 $ 3,476.00 $261.00 $ 2,871.00 34 2501.505 30' RC PIPE APRON 2 EACH $1,500.00 $ 3,000.00 $765.00 $ 1,530.00 $646.00 $ 1,292.00 35 2502.521 6' HDPE SUMP DRAIN TILE 4930 LF $8.00 $ 39,440.00 $7.85 $ 38,700.50 $9.05 $ 44,616.50 36 2502.602 6' SUMP DRAIN CLEANOUT 29 EACH $120.00 $ 3,480.00 $142.00 $ 4,118.00 $271.00 $ 7,859.00 37 2502.602 4' SUMP DRAIN INLET (TEE, STUB 8 PLUG) 85 EACH $80.00 $ 6,800.00 $ 30,780.00 $95.00 $24.60 $ 8,075.00 $ 26,568.00 $220.00 $38.70 $ 18,700.00 $ 41,796.00 38 2503.Y ' RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V 1080 LF 50 DATE PRINTED: 5112I20va PAGE 1 OF 2 SOUTH HARRI K (WEST) NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION BID TABUU CITY OF EDINA CONTRACT NO. L.- 05-4 IMPROVEMENT NOS. A -204, WM-439, STS-300 AND SS -423 BID DATE: MAY 11 11:04. _.n. SCHEDULE C: WATER MAIN (WM -439) Engineers Estimate Midwest Asphalt Corporation Hopkins, MN Park Construction Company Minneapolis, MN NO. ITEM. NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITS UNIT COST AMOUNT UNIT COST AMOUNT UNIT COST AMOUNT 39 2503.541 18' RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V 817 LF $33.00 $ 26.961.00 $29.40 $ 24,019.80 $40.90 $ 33,415.30 40 2503.541 24' RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL III 931 LF $37.00 $ 34,447.00 $35.40 $ 32,957.40 $45.40 $ 42,267.40 41 2503.541 30' RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL III 48 LF $44.00 $ 2,112.00 $51.65 $ 2,479.20 $71.80 $ 3,446.40 42 2506.501 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 60-4020 13.6 LF $380.00 $ 5,168.00 $305.00 $ 4,148.00 $331.00 $ 4,501.60 43 2506.501 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 54 -4020 39.6 LF $350.00 $ 13,860.00 $267.00 $ 10,573.20 $362.00 $ 14,335.20 44 2506.501 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPEC (TYPE CC) 76.7 LF $280.00 $ 21,476.00 $218.00 $ 16,720.60 $226.00 $ 17,334.20 45 2506.501 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPEC (TYPE BB) 292 LF $230.00 $ 6,716.00 $261.00 $ 7,621.20 $266.00 $ 7,76720 46 2506.502 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPEC 1 1 EACH $25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $16,900.00 $ 16,900.00 $23,200.00 $ 23,200.00 47 2506.516 CASTING ASSEMBLY (R- 3067V) 24 EACH $520.00 $ 12,480.00 $385.00 $ 9,240.00 $413.00 $ 9,912.00 48 2506.516 ICASTING ASSEMBLY (R -1733) 5 EACH $450.00 $ 2,250.00 $503.00 $ 2,515.00 $443.00 $ 2,215.00 49 2511.501 RANDOM RIP RAP CLASS III 22 CY $70.00 $ 1,540.00 $100.00 $ 2,200.00 $88.30 $ 1,942.60 ISUBTOTAL-SCHEDULES S 251,240.00 $ 221,395.40 S 284,203A0 SCHEDULE C: WATER MAIN (WM -439) 50 2104.509 REMOVE GATE VALVE 15 EACH $100.00 $ 1,500.00 $280.00 $ 4,200.00 $123.00 $ 1,845.00 51 2104.509 REMOVE HYDRANT AND GATE VALVE 9 EACH $300.00 $ 2,700.00 $418.00 $ 3,762.00 $247.00 $ 2,223.00 52 2104.509 REMOVE WATER SERVICE 81 EACH $170.00 $ 13,770.00 $260.00 $ 21,060.00 $170.00 $ 13,770.00 53 2504.601 TEMPORARY WATER SERVICE 1 LS $25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $45,600.00 $ 45,600.00 54 2504.602 HYDRANT & 6' GATE VALVE 8 EACH $3,800.00 $ 30,400.00 $3,475.00 $ 27,800.00 $4,700.00 $ 37,600.00 55 1 2504.602 6' GATE VALVE 15 EACH $775.00 $ 11,625.00 $952.00 $ 14,280.00 $1,020.00 $ 15,300.00 56 1 2504.602 1 1' TYPE K COPPER WATER SERVICE COMPLETE 81 EACH $700.00 $ 56,700.00 $645.00 $ 52,245.00 $1,380.00 $ 111,780.00 57 2504.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN 6 EACH $1,400.00 $ 8,400.00 $1,185.00 $ 7,110.00 $1,730.00 $ 10,380.00 58 2504.603 6' WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL 52 4730 LF $29.50 $ 139,535.00 $24.30 $ 114,939.00 $44.60 $ 210,958.00 59 2504.604 4' POLYSTYRENE INSULATION 21 S Y $20.00 $ 420.00 $29.80 $ 625.80 $206.00 $ 4,326.00 60 2504.608 WATERMAIN FITTINGS 1500 LBS $3.05 1 $ 4,575.00 $5.95 1 $ 8,925.00 $12.10 1 $ 18,150.00 SUBTOTAL • SCHEDULE C S 294,625.00 $ 284,946.80 $ 471,932.00 SCHEDULED: SANITARY SEWER (SS-423) 61 2503.511 10' PVC PIPE SEWER ( SDR 35) 385 LF $70.00 $ 26,950.00 $4625 $ 17,606.25 $135.00 $ 51,975.00 62 2503.602 RECONNECT SANITARY SEWER SERVICE 6 EACH $650.00 $ 5,200.00 $470.00 $ 3,760.00 $1,540.00 $ 12,320.00 63 2503.603 SANITARY SEWER SPOT REPAIR (10' PVC SEWER PIPE SDR 35) 75 LF $150.00 $ 11,250.00 $61.50 $ 4,612.50 $131.00 $ 9,825.00 64 2503.602 PIPE JOINT REPAIR 310 EACH $150.00 $ 46,500.00 $50.00 $ 15,500.00 $44.10 $ 13,671.00 65 2506.516 CASTING ASSEMBLY (R -1733) 5 EACH $450.00 $ 2,250.00 $503.00 $ 2,515.00 $443.00 $ 2,215.00 66 2506.521 INSTALL CASTING 2 EACH $350.00 $ 700.00 $260.00 $ 560.00 $398.00 $ 796.00 67 1 2506.603 IRECONSTRUCT SANITARY MANHOLES 21 LF $280.00 $ 5,680.00 $590.00 $ 12,390.00 $1,130.00 $ 23,730.00 SUBTOTAL-SCHEDULED $ 98,730.00 $ 57,143.75 i 114,532.00 PROJECT TOTAL (SCHEDULES A, B, C. D & E) S 1,191,240.00 $ 1,029,872.15 i 1,402,478A0 DATE PRINTED: 5112/2005 PAGE 2 OF 2 •r TO: FROM: VIA: SUBJECT: DATE: Mayor & City Council REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Wayne D. Houle, PE, City Engineer � "*- Gordon Hughes, City Manager REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 May 17, 2005 AGENDA ITEM IV.B ITEM DESCRIPTION: Contract No. ENG 05 -6, ARDEN PARK CANOE ACCESS & WEST 54 STREET BEAUTIFICATION IMPROVEMENTS, Improvement No. B -101. Company 1. Sunram Construction, Inc. 2. Hoffman & McNamara Company RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Sunram Construction, Inc. GENERAL INFORMATION: Amount of Quote or Bid $ 47,205.97 $ 59,347.30 $ 47,205.97 This project includes improving the boulevard area of West 54th Street and Minnehaha Creek, along with adding a canoe landing and benches along the creek, see attached plan. This project was initiated by petition from local residents.. The area is currently used for storing temporary street sweeping material. A neighborhood meeting was held in 2004 with all attendees approving the plan. The Capital Improvement Plan allocated $65,000 for this project. Funding for this project will be from the Storm Water Utility Fund, Revolving Fund, and from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD). MCWD will be reviewing the funding for this project at their May 19th Board Meeting; we anticipate funding from the MCWD for the canoe landing of $7,600. Staff recommends awarding this project to Sunram Construction, Inc. Signature The Recommended Bid is x within budget Public Works - Engineering Department not within dget Hughes, City Director CITY OF EDINA CONTRACT NO. ENG 05-6 IMPROVEMENT NO. B -101 ARDEN PARK CANOE ACCESS AND W. 54TH STREET BID OPENING: MAY 10, 2005 11:00 A.M. CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID Sunram Construction, Inc. $ 47,205.97 Corcoran, MN Hoffman & McNamara Co. $ 59,347.30 Hastings, MN ENGINEERS ESTIMATE $ 41,887.25 ARDEN PARK CANOE ACCESS AND BID TABULATION Bid Date: May 10, 2005 W. 54TH ST BEAUTIFICATION IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT ENG 05-6 11:00 A.M. IMPROVEMENT NO. B -101 Engineer's Estimate Sunram Construction, Inc. Corcoran, MN Hoffman & McNamara Co. Hastin s, MN Item Description Qty Unit Unit Cost Amount Unit Price Total Unit Price Total 1 MOBILIZATION / DEMOBILIZATION 1 LS $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 2 FLOTATION SILT CURTAIN 50 LF $ 10.00 $ 500.00 $ 20.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 25.00 $ 1,250.00 3 TREE PROTECTION 1 LS $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 4 TEMPORARY PLANT PROTECTION FENCE 909 LF $ 2.25 $ 2,045.25 $ 1.84 $ 1,672.56 $ 2.40 $ 2,181.60 5 BRUSH CLEARING AND HERBICING 1 LS $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 600.00 $ 600.00 6 SEEDED 12" COMPOST LOGS 221 LF $ 2.00 $ 442.00 $ 2.63 $ 581.23 $ 2.70 $ 596.70 7 SPLIT RAIL FENCE 82 LF $ 12.00 $ 984.00 $ 11.00 $ 902.00 $ 23.00 $ 1,886.00 8 TREE REMOVALS 12"- 19" DBH 2 EA $ 450.00 $ 900.00 $ 200.00 $ 400.00 $ 200.00 $ 400.00 9 TREE REMOVALS 20" OR GREATER DBH 1 EA $ 750.00 $ 750.00 $ 800.00 $ 800.00 $ 600.00 $ 600.00 10 RAINGARDEN EXCAVATION 20 CY $ 5.00 $ 100.00 $ 20.00 $ 400.00 $ 100.00 $ 2,000.00 11 TURF GRASS 690 SF $ 0.05 $ 34.50 $ 1.50 $ 1,035.00 $ 0.83 $ 572.70 12 ROOT WADS 6 EA $ 250.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 600.00 $ 3,600.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 12,000:00 13 SHORT LIVE STAKES 83 SY $ 25.00 $ 2,075.00 $ 45.00 $ 3,735.00 $ 60.00 $ 4,980.00 14 NATIVE SEEDING IN 2" COMPOST BLANKET 1076 SY $ 4.00 $ 4,304.00 $ 2.68 $ 2,883.68 $ 2.80 $ 3,012.80 15 NATIVE PLUGS 1795 EA $ 2.50 $ 4,487.50 $ 2.70 $ 4,846.50 $ 2.50 $ 4,487.50 16 1.25" CALIPER QUERCUS MACROCARPUS 3 EA $ 300.00 $ 900.00 $ 500.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 220.00 $ 660.00 17 6' HEIGHT AMELANCHIER LAEVIS 6 EA $ 115.00 $ 690.00 $ 450.00 $ 2,700.00 $ 220.00 $ 1,320.00 18 CANOE ACCESS DOCK 1 LS $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 7,600.00 $ 7,600.00 $ 9,950.00 $ 9,950.00 19 BENCHES 3 EA $ 75.00 $ 225.00 $ 150.00 $ 450.00 $ 300.00 $ 900.00 20 CRUSHED CONCRETE BITUMINOUS PATH 1,150 SF $ 5.00 $ 5,750.00 $ 5.00 $ 5,750.00 $ 2.00 $ 2,300.00 23 2 YEARS OF MAINTENANCE 1 LS $ 8,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 1,850.00 $ 1,850.00 $ 2,650.00 $ 2,650.00 BASE BID TOTAL $ 41,887.25 $ 47,205.97 $ 59,347.30 DEDUCT ALTERNATE NO. 1 1 LS $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,600.00 $ 3,000.00 ADD ALTERNATE 2 1 LS $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 10,000.00 ADD ALTERNATE 3 1 LS $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,200.00 $ 3,750.00 ADD ALTERNATE 4 1 LS $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 3,200.00 $ 6,000.00 GRAND TOTAL Temporary Plant Protecti( Turf Grass 3 Quercus macrocarpa Match grade of top of 54 path to top of adjacent curb. Split Rail 1767MM7' 40 "ro Raingarden Limit '0 23 Silphium perfoliatum, 18 it O.C. 3 Amelanchier laevis Bench 37 Aster azureus 12" o.c. 4 Rows of compost logs with short live Add Alternate - Field Located by L.A. .4 " - 7 f ww�i'-41'rrgg� ence Rock Construction Entrance: - to be field located by Project HE scape Architect See project specifications incidental to project costs T' 717.74--, 61 U-1 WAZ WrAFAM 17' 15' C M P INV=861.4 ---------------- INV=864.9 U, Bridge 39 Ratibida pinnata 12" o.c. I V=863.8 _— _— _— __ - -_J INV=863.8 MP 17' 15' ADS 3Amelanchierlaevis INV=863.3 =861.07 'Short Live Stakes A 6 ot Wads - to be field located by Project L.A. R aingarden of 'Minneh ha Creek 102 Frag;#ia vesca, 1211 O.C. I Fragaria j esca, 121V O.C. agairia vesca, 12 o.c. Seeded 12" Compost Log (Compost Log UNT 0 KEY + + across path to be removed upon completion Native Seeding in Compost BI et 46 Ctnw of construction) 12" Compost Log (Temporary Dsion Control) Compost Logs with Live Stakes dd Alternate) 4" deep, 48" wide Crushed + Concrete Bituminous Path + + Temporary Plant Protection Pence Native S eding in Compost et Compacted to ASTM Proctor 95 Split Rail Fence %; 1% cross slope facing downhill Short Live Stakes -...*—Flotation Silt Curtain VZZZZZZZA Rain Garden GENERAL NOTES: Benches 0 ME= Plugs 1. See raingarden specifications and drawings for excavation, soil, and plant specs . . . . . . Turf Grass 2. See specifications for seed lists. 3. Crushed concrete bituminous for path shall be supplied by Owner for installation by Contractor. 20 0 20 4. Six foot free standing park benches (3) supplied by Owner to be installed by Contractor per Manufacturer's recommendations on surface of 6" crushed bituminous provided by Owner. Benches supplied shall be Minncor Industries item # 1077707300. Canoe Access Dock - to be field located by ++++ Project L.A. K+-++- Short Live Stakes LU -4 -SHJL -5 C4 s .3 9. W t)o rn CA C-,4 W E* �U I! Q) -49 U 00 �U I! Q) 0 X911.. ^,,171 I ` Y oe a REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item V.A. From: GORDON L. HUGHES Consent ❑ CITY MANAGER ! Information Only ❑ Date: MAY' 17, 2005 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To. Council Subject: REQUEST FOR CHANGE ❑ Motion TO SECTION 900 OF CITY ❑ Resolution CODE REGARDING ON- ❑ Ordinance SALE INTOXICATING ® Discussion LIQUOR LICENSES IN THE PCD -2 DISTRICT INFORMATIONBACKGROUND: Attached is a letter from Richard T. Curtin, owner of the building at 5034 France Avenue. As explained in Mr. Curtin s letter, he has signed a letter of intent-with Parsole Restaurant Holdings which intends to establish a restaurant at 5034 France Avenue. Parsole intends to apply for an intoxicating on -sale liquor license for this restaurant. The property is zoned PCD -2, Planned Commercial District. Section 900 of the City Code permits the issuance of on -sale intoxicating liquor licenses in the PCD -2 District but requires that such establishments may not exceed 150 seats., Apparently, Parsole's requirement is that the restaurant must . provide 225 seats. Therefore, they are requesting that the City amend Section 900 of the Code to permit the issuance of an on -sale intoxicating liquor license for restaurants with at seating capacity of over 150 seats. o REPORT/ RECOMMENDATION - Code Section 900 May 17,.2005 Page two The Council amended Section 900 of the Code in 1999, to provide for the issuance of on- sale intoxicating liquor licenses. I have attached a copy of a portion of the Council Minutes that are relevant to the question at hand. Based upon the Minutes, it appears that the City's concern with respect to restaurant size .dealt mainly with parking availability at 501h & France rather than any particular issues with respect to the service of alcohol. The Council's policy has been to amend the provisions of the liquor ordinance only after conducting a public hearing. If the Council wishes to consider the request of Mr. Curtin and Parasole Restaurant Holdings, we would recommend that it schedule a hearing for June 7, 2005. Enclosure RICHARD T. CURTIN 6310 McIntyre Pointe Edina, Minnesota 55439 Edina City Council C/O Edina City Clerk 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Edina City Council: May 12, 2005 Re: Request to reconsider Edina Code Section 900.09, Subd. 5 I own the Ampersand Building, located at 5034 France Avenue South. I have signed a letter of intent with Parasole Restaurant Holdings, Inc, a local company with a proven record of operating successful restaurants who are good neighbors. We have agreed on all essential terms and are now waiting for the attorneys to draft the lease. It is expected that we will be signing a lease later this month. We are pleased to be dealing with such an established restaurant operator and we are confidant Parasole can and will develop a neighborhood restaurant at 50th and France that meets the needs of the community. They have asked that I make a long- term commitment, as they desire to build a restaurant that continues in operation for many years. I have agreed to options that could extend their lease to 30 years. Parasole knows Edina well and it has operated restaurants in neighborhood as well as urban environments. Parasole operates the Good Earth in Edina and in Roseville, Manny's in downtown Minneapolis, Muffuletta in St. Paul, and Figlio and Chino's at Lake and Hennepin in Minneapolis. They also developed the Oceanaire restaurant in downtown Minneapolis, a restaurant so successful it has been transferred to a separate operating entity and expanded to Dallas, San Diego, Atlanta, D.C., Seattle and Indianapolis. I am writing to request a review of the restaurant size restrictions in the PCD -2 Zoning District. Edina Code Section 900.09 Sub. 5 limits the size of a restaurant with a liquor license located in the PCD-2 Zoning District to 150 seats. To provide the type and quality of restaurant that meets the community's needs, we would like to provide 225 seats. That size would provide a restaurant designed to meet the needs of the neighborhood for family dining as well as the needs of local business for an additional business lunch and dinner venue. M If the City approves this change, we would anticipate the restaurant opening in November of this year. Thank you for your consideration. Sincere Richard T. Curtin 952 - 828 -0900 Minutes/Edina City Council/lanuary 19,1999 Mayor Smith asked how the project would proceed and does Edina retain design control. He endorsed the project pointing out it was a water quality. project. Engineer Hoffman explained that if the proposed project is given concept plan approval then staff will work with the Watershed District to design a plan and bring it back before the City Council. Member Hovland stated conceptually the proposed improvement is terrific. He commended the Pamela Lake Association for their initiative. Member Faust voiced her support of the project. She added she remembers playing with friends at Pamela Lake during the 50's. Member Maetzold voiced his support for the project. Member Kelly reiterated previous Council members support. He added he hoped people understood the proposed project should bring no new water into the area. Motion by Member Faust and seconded by Member Maetzold approving the Concept Plan for the Pamela Lake/Pamela Park Wetland Restoration and Water Quality Project. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith Motion carried. DRAFT LIQUOR ORDINANCE AND POLICY DISCUSSED Manager Hughes explained that as instructed January 4, 1999, staff has prepared the draft ordinance regulating the issuance of on -sale intoxicating liquor licenses. The draft also reformatted the entire liquor code improving its readability. Additionally, a draft resolution was prepared, providing a policy statement for the issuance of the initial licenses. The resolution contemplates that license applications will first be received from restaurants currently holding on -sale wine licenses. Following receipt of such applications, the Council would be in a better position to establish criteria for issuing the remaining licenses. Manager Hughes pointed out some highlights from the draft ordinance: 1. Section 900.04 A. - On -Sale Club Liquor License - Limits Club licenses to establishments possessing licenses on December 31,1998; 2. Section 900.04 F. - Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor Licenses - Continues limiting issuance to the Edina Foundation once per calendar year; 3. Section 900.06 - Public Hearing Requirement - Prior to issuance of new intoxicating licenses - public hearing must be held*but is not required upon renewal or transfer; 4. Section 900.07 - Refunds - Provided for the first time under specific conditions, they are entitled to a pro -rata refund based upon months of operation - added because of significant application fee; 5. Section 900.08 N. - One Intoxicating Liquor License allowed per person - may be concern for some existing restaurants; (_ ection 900.09 Subd 5_= Limits eligible locations for licenses to PCD -2, PCD -3 or Mixe Development District - not allowed in G2; should not be allowed in building containuig cInore -than 150 seats due to parking concern and have limited -it to 150 seats; and ; 7. Section 900.10 - Subd 16 - Adult Entertainment Prohibited - clarified that any establishment with an adult entertainment component would not be allowed to have a liquor license. Page 5 Minutes/Edina City CounciV]anuary.19,1999 Manager Hughes reviewed a draft resolution that could provide a policy statement for issuance of the initial licenses. The resolution would allow license applications to be received from restaurants holding on -sale wine licenses for a specified period. Following receipt of such applications, in staff's opinion, the Council could better determine criteria for issuance of the remaining licenses. Following a brief Council discussion, Tuesday, February 16, 1999, was set for the hearing date on the issuance of on -sale intoxicating liquor licenses. Mayor Smith reminded the Council the draft ordinance will be back before the Council on February 1, 1999, and the public hearing held on February 16, 1999. Council comments: Mayor Smith inquired who were the 'certain organizations' referred to in Section 900.04 G. Manager Hughes said they are non - profits and are defined later in the draft ordinance. Mayor Smith further questioned 900.04 - Proof of Financial Responsibility. Manager Hughes explained it is an insurance requirement imposed by Statute. Mayor Smith asked if the Edina Police Department could be included in 900.04 D. He believes the CPA certification should automatically be required within the process of licensing. Mayor Smith turned the remainder of the Council meeting over to Mayor Pro -tem Maetzold and left the Council Chambers Member Kelly said he had nothing further to add. He believes the draft ordinance looks terrific and he would not change anything. He voiced some concern with the preference period and questioned whether it is necessary to have one, but would concur with the 30 days. Member Faust asked if 44th & France is being eliminated from the allowable locations. Manager Hughes said the locations being proposed to be eliminated are mainly the PCD -1 locations - 441h & France, Wooddale & Valley View and 701h & Cahill. Member Faust clarified we would then have the 50th area, greater Southdale and Grandview areas. Manager Hughes added plus the Mixed Development District of Edinborough /Centennial Lakes. Member Faust believed previously the number of licenses was going to start with 10 and go up. after that point after we saw how it all worked. Manager Hughes replied the number of licenses issued will be a Council decision. The resolution allowed a preference period for the wine licensees. If all the wine licensees applied and all were issued, 16 of the allowable 19 licenses would be used. Manager Hughes believes not all 16 wine license holders will apply for an on -sale intoxicating liquor license. A decision on a cap would be easier to make after having heard and decided upon all the existing wine licensees. Member Faust asked if legally it would easier to set a limit before the applications are submitted rather than after. Manager Hughes said he and Attorney Gilligan had a concern with granting a preference to the wine licensees and then imposing. a cap that would not accommodate all of them. Mayor Pro - tem Maetzold asked if we had 16 eligible and the cap is set at 10, how would the 10 be decided upon. Member Kelly stated that was the reason he questioned whether preferences were a good idea or not. Manager Hughes said it seems if the Council wishes to have a cap, it is best to then not have a preference. Member Kelly said if all 16 licensees apply that is not positive, but he believes this will not happen. Member Faust asked how the number could be limited ahead of time. Manager Hughes said a limit could be enacted by resolution. Member Faust asked if the criteria would need to be established ahead of time so we would not be discriminating after we see the applications and who would we prefer. Attorney Gilligan stated a fair amount of discretion exists in Page 6 N Minutes/Edina City CounciVlanuM 19,1999 picking and choosing between applicants as long as it is not discriminatory and a reasonable basis exists for doing it. Member Faust said she believes it would -be easier to limit the number ahead of time. Attorney Gilligan said the message needs to get out that just because you apply does not mean you will be licensed. Member Faust asked if the Council consensus is that the number should be limited now. Member Kelly said he does not feel strongly about it one way or the other. He has trouble with the preference because if you are an existing restaurateur in the City and want a liquor license, you will apply immediately for an evaluation whether the City gives them a preference or not. He further does not believe preferences later will be a big issue. If we want to restrict the number it makes sense to get rid of the preference. He would like to see some new, high- quality, fine- dining restaurants come into the City. Member Faust felt the City should go slowly, and can always decide after the fact if we believe 13, 14, or 15 are all right but we could not go back. Mayor Pro -tem Maetzold said he likes the concept of giving preference to the wine licensees. They have made an investment in the community and have passed licensing requirements already and he believes they should have preference. As long as Attorney Gilligan stated the number could be reduced at a later date he would favor not putting on a cap. Member Hovland asked clarification from Attorney Gilligan that the Council would have flexibility in making subsequent determinations as to who we wanted to have licenses should we decide to limit our licenses at our statutory predetermined number. He knows we have the legal ability to waive off the cap, as Bloomington has done, and could expand the number of licenses. Attorney Gilligan said the residents of Edina would have to vote on whether to raise the number of licenses over 19. Member Hovland said after we see who applies during the 30 day period and after determining how many licenses we want to issue, he would be comfortable with letting the existing wine license holders come forward first and have a 30 day preference. He concurs with Mayor Pro- tem. Maetzold that existing wine licensees should be given a running start. He concluded he is comfortable with the way the ordinance is drafted. Member Hovland questioned the definition of hotel. Attorney Gilligan answered the definition is directly out of the State Statute. Member Hovland asked about Section 900.06 where the ordinance states no hearing will be required for renewal of the license which makes sense, but questioned the transfer of an existing on -sale intoxicating liquor license. He examined Section 900.13 showing a restriction on a license. He inquired whether the word "license" should be included in the definitions as defined in Section 900.04. When it is stated as restrictions on transfer of license and with no definition included, it could become ambiguous as to which license is restricted for transfer. He noted the person applying (transferee) would have to apply as if he were a new owner. If an applicant is applying in the same manner a new owner would, but is buying a. license from someone else, he should have to comply with all hearing requirements as a new owner. Attorney Gilligan said if liquor were already served at that premise, a hearing could be required on a license transfer. Member Hovland asked if any public issues could be particular to the proposed transferee and should be addressed in a public hearing. Attorney Gilligan answered a public hearing could be held if the existing operation would change a great deal. Background checks and investigations are done just as if it were a new applicant. Member Kelly stated he believes the review process is covered well in the proposed ordinance. Member Hovland asked clarification of the return of investigation fees. Manager Hughes said we have always refunded investigative fees' monies not spent as required by Statute. The change recommended is with the application fee and the existing ordinance does not allow refunding. Member Hovland again asked about the definition of hotel and asked if we are avoiding dealing Page 7 Minutes/Edina City Council/lanuary 19,1999 with hotels. Attorney Gilligan said a hotel is subject to the same limitations on bar seating, but is done on a hotel wide basis as well as the percentage of sales. Manager Hughes said the ordinance should clarify that hotels will be viewed collectively rather than incrementally. Attorney Gilligan said it was anticipated the license would be issued to the hotel as a licensed premises. Member Maetzold asked what happens if a bottle (in its original package) of liquor is delivered to a room. Does the City .want to permit this or not and would it be appropriate to say this in the ordinance. Manager Hughes said whether the bottle is opened or unopened is irrelevant. What the ordinance says is, liquor in any form in a room whether it be unopened or by the drink, the hotel has to comply.. Manager Hughes offered that these questions within the proposed ordinance -would be re- examined. Member Maetzold said the proposed ordinance states that no micro - brewing can take place on premises. Police Chief Bernhjelm stated that issue is dealt with in the State Statute and takes precedence over City ordinances. Manager Hughes said a micro - brewery is not a manufacturer under State Law. Member Hovland asked clarification of when a refund might be issued on an annual license fee. Manager Hughes explained the City may not be issuing on -sale intoxicating liquor licenses until after April-1, therefore, all wine licensed restaurants will have already purchased their licenses and could be entitled to a refund. He reminded there would be no need to hold a wine license if you have been issued an on -sale intoxicating liquor license. Member Maetzold inquired if a wine . license is renewed on April 15t and they submit a on -sale intoxicating liquor application on May 15t, does a whole new investigation take place. Manager Hughes said staff's thought was that we can only extract an investigation fee equal to the amount we spend. If an investigation had just been completed for a wine license, there perhaps would not be any investigation for an intoxicating license. Their money might be refunded or a cursory review fee charged. Member Faust asked if an elected official could be licensed to sell on -sale intoxicating liquor. Manager Hughes replied that under the existing code granting an elected official a license would be the Council's discretion, but the draft ordinance has language prohibiting a City employee or elected official from obtaining a liquor license. No formal Council action was taken.. *RESOLUTION SETTING HEARING DATE SET OF FEBRUARY 16 1999 FOR VACATION OF PORTION OF WEST 41sT STREET (4024 GRIMES AVENUE) Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Maetzold approving the following resolution: RESOLUTION CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF PORTION OF WEST 41sT STREET - 4024 GRIMES AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina as follows: 1. It is hereby found an determined. that the following described property should be considered for vacation in accordance. with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 160.29 and 42.348. Subd. 7: 2. This Council shall meet at 7:00 P.M. on the 1611, day of February, 1999, for the purpose of holding a public hearing on whether such vacation shall be made in the interest of the public. Page 8 P- A— R- A.S -O -L —E May 13, 2005 The Honorable James Hovland City of Edina City Hall 4801 West 50`h Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Proposed Restaurant Plans for 5034 France Avenue Dear Mayor Hovland: Thank you for giving me the opportunity to tell you about our proposed restaurant for the 50`h and France district. Odeon is an exciting and very personal project for me. I have been a restaurant owner- operator for nearly 30 years. Muffuletta, which opened in 1977, was my first restaurant establishment. As CEO of Parasole Restaurant Holdings, Inc., we now also operate Manny's Steakhouse, Figlio, Chino Latino and of course The Good Earth, which has been open in Edina for about 20 years. I also developed the national concepts Buca di Beppo and The Oceanaire Seafood Room, which were spun -off from Parasole as separate entities several years ago. My wife Joanne and I have lived in Edina since 1976. All three of my children graduated from Edina High School and my mother lives at the Lanterns behind Lunds. Parasole Restaurant Holdings Company is a Minneapolis -based restaurant development company with an excellent reputation for owning and operating high quality, food - focused restaurants. Our six existing restaurants have a combined operating history of over 100 years in the Twin Cities and our newest venture, Stella's Fish Cafe and Prestige Oyster Bar is scheduled to open in June on Lake Street in Uptown. We not only support the concept of "Neighborhood Dining ", we have embraced the idea by developing a new concept, Odeon, which was designed specifically and only for 50`h and France. Odeon will be uniquely suited to the neighborhood: intimate, friendly, approachable, affordable and authentic. It will be a lunch haven, offering an array of bistro - influenced dishes. At night, Odeon will be that - and much more, with a boutique wine list, Manny's quality steaks, fresh seafood and a sophisticated, yet utterly relaxed, family - friendly ambiance all its own. City officials have stated two uses may be accommodated in this structure, and there is ample parking in the immediate area to meet the City's requirements and Odeon's operational needs. Some renovations will be required as per the adopted building codes, and all applicable licenses and approvals must be secured prior to receiving the Certificate of Occupancy and becoming operational. There is only one major impediment to this project. The building is located in a PCD -2 zoning subdistrict, and certain limitations concerning On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor Licenses in this PCD -2 zone were established when the referendum allowing liquor licenses was adopted. Specific language in the Edina City Code Section 900.09 Places Ineligible for a License, Subd. 5- On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor Licenses states that no On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License shall be granted to any establishment located in the PCD -2 Subdistrict which will contain more than 150 seats unless a restaurant had a wine license and more than 150 seats prior to December 31, 1998. Obviously, Odeon did not exist at this time, so the exception would not apply. Parasole Restaurant Holdings, Inc. 3001 Hennepin Avenue South, Suite 301A; Minneapolis, Minnesota 55408 6121822 -0016 • FAX 6121822 -0705 ® .. INK Page Two Letter to Mayor Hovland May 13, 2005 The proposed Odeon has 202 indoor seats and 28 seasonal patio seats and needs to offer a complete venue of alcoholic beverages including intoxicating liquor drinks as a complement to its discerning, distinctive menu. The above referenced seat restriction will not allow this to happen. Therefore, Parasole Restaurant Holdings respectfully requests that the Mayor and City Council take action to amend or modify the existing code to ease the seat restrictions within a PCD -2 Subdistrict. We request that the code be amended to allow a 225 -seat restaurant establishment to obtain an On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License within this District. We truly feel this seat increase will not negatively impact the distinguished neighborhood feel of the 50`h and France community, but will provide a compatible, creative use in this planned commercial district. We look forward to becoming a part of your community, and we will take you on an exciting visual tour of the proposed new restaurant at the May 17`h City Council meeting, at which time we would be more than happy to answer any questions that you may have. In the interim, should you need additional info ion, ple Ase contact me at 612 - 822 -0016. Sin c I Y Vl.c, Phil Roberts CEO Parasole Restaurant Holdings, Inc. cc: Mr. Gordon Hughes, Edina City Manager REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # Y. B. From: Boyd Tate Consent °® Traffic Safety Coordinator Information Only ❑ Date: May 17, 2005 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: Traffic Safety Staff Review for ® To Council May 10, 2005 Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: n Review and approve Traffic Safety Staff Review of Tuesday, May 10, 2005. Info /Background: It is not anticipated that residents will 'be in attendance at the Council meeting regarding the attached issues. p U 0 0 G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Advisory Committee \Staff Review Summaries\05 TS AG & Min\rr 5- 17- 05.doc O TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW Tuesday, May 10, 2005 The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on May 10, 2005. Staff present included the City Engineer, Traffic Engineer, Traffic Safety Coordinator, City Planner, Sign Coordinator, Traffic Safety Sergeant and Chief of Police. From that review, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They have also been informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the May 17, 2005 Council Agenda. SECTION A: Requests that staff recommends approval of request: 1. Request to reduce the NO TURN ON RED prohibition period during non - peak times when fewer pedestrians are present for the northbound (to eastbound) leg at the Wooddale Avenue and West 50th Street intersection. The requestor is an area resident that frequents this intersection several times during the day and feels traffic is needlessly tied up with the current turn /time restrictions. Current signing at this intersection prohibits a right turn on red between 7 a.m. to 9 p.m. for the northbound (to eastbound) and westbound (to southbound) legs. The NO TURN ON RED signs including painted crosswalks and stop bars where installed in August 1999 as ordered by the City Council in response to a vehicle - bicycle accident that occurred on July 21, 1999. The non -fatal accident occurred when a vehicle driver making a right turn from northbound to eastbound struck a child and bicycle. Currently, the levels and conditions of vehicle traffic, pedestrians, roadway geometrics and traffic accident data at this intersection do not _warrant the installation of NO TURN ON RED signs (for any approach). The turning restrictions do add a certain amount of delay to the intersection operations. Non - consistent use of traffic signs tends to lead to disobedience, which also contributes and leads to safety issues. An optional sign that is typically used to add a heightened awareness for drivers and to remind the driver of their responsibility when a right turn on red is permitted is a STOP FOR PEDESTRIAN IN CROSSWALK sign. Traffic Safety Staff Review May 10, 2005 Page 1 of 2 Staff recommends removing the NO TURN ON RED signs due to lack of • warrants and to ensure consistent use of these signs throughout the City and State. Staff also recommends installinq STOP FOR PEDESTRIAN IN CROSSWALK signs for all approaches. SECTION B: Requests that staff recommends denial of request: None for the May 10, 2005 meeting. SECTION C: Requests that are deferred to a later date or referred to others: Request to install no parking zones and restrict student drop -offs along South View Lane and along the Frontage Road adjacent to the South View Middle School and the Community Center /Normandale Elementary School. The requestor is a resident on Sherwood Avenue and is concerned with safety issues with parking and student drop -off surrounding the school area. The area is currently posted with parking restrictions that have been in place for a number of years which accommodate the school's bus pick -up, short term parking and student drop -off areas. Currently, the school /community center site is expanding the parking lot capacity and adding off - street drop -off areas. Once this project is fully complete, staff recommends further evaluating the surrounding on- street parking restrictions and drop -off maneuvers. Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 2 of 2 May 10, 2005 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: - Wayne D. Houle, PEQ), A— City Engineer Date: May 17, 2005 Subject: No Parking Any Time Resolution — Brookside Avenue, Dewey Hill Road, West 50th Street and West 54"' Street. Recommendation: Agenda Item # V. C. Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Authorize new resolutions relating to parking restrictions on Brookside Avenue from Interlachen Boulevard to 350 -ft north of Brookside Court (north) to City limits, Dewey Hill Road from Gleason Road to Cahill Road, West 50th Street from Wooddale Avenue to France Avenue and West 54th Street from Park Place to 100 -ft west of Minnehaha Boulevard. Info /Background: These projects are all Municipal State Aid Projects that require no parking resolutions restricting parking on one or both sides of the street due to required standards and the existing /proposed widths of the streets. ° U u Staff recommends approval of the attached resolutions. RESOLUTON NO. 2005-37 RELATING TO PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON S.A.P. NOs.120- 138-07 (Dewey Hill Road), 120-154-04 (Brookside Avenue), 120 - 141 -12 (West 50th Street) & 120 - 142 -02 (West 54th Street) WHEREAS, the City of Edina has planned the improvements of MSAS 138 (Dewey Hill Road) from Gleason Road to Cahill Road; MSAS 154 (Brookside Avenue) from Interlachen Boulevard to 350 -ft north of Brookside Court (north) to City limits; MSAS 141 (West 50th Street) from Wooddale Avenue to France Avenue; and MSAS 142 (West 54th Street) from Park Place to 100 -ft west of Minnehaha Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina will be expending Municipal Street Aid Funds on the improvement of these Streets, and WHEREAS, these improvements do not provide adequate width for parking on both sides of the street; and approval of the proposed construction as Municipal State Aid Street projects must therefore be conditioned upon certain parking restrictions. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS THEREBY RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina shall ban the parking of motor vehicles on one side of MSAS 138 (Dewey Hill Road) from Gleason Road to Cahill Road; on MSAS 154 (Brookside Avenue) on both sides from Interlachen Boulevard to West 49th Street, on one side from West 49th Street to Brookside Court (north), and on both sides from Brookside Court (north) to 350 -ft north of Brookside Court (north) to City limits; on MSAS 141 (West 50th Street) on one side from Wooddale Avenue to 200 -ft east of Halifax Avenue and on both sides from 200 -ft east of Halifax Avenue to 200 -ft west of France Avenue; and on one side of MSAS 142 (West 54th Street) from Park Place to 100 -ft west of Minnehaha Boulevard, at all times. Attest Passed and adopted this 17th day of May 2005. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) CITY OF EDINA ) M James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of May 17, 2005, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this day of .2005. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk "cbxPOa,.�- REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor Hovland and members of Agenda Item V. D. the Edina City Council. From: John Keprios; Direct r Consent ❑ ° Park & Recreation Depa et Information Only ❑ Date: May 17, 2.005 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Off -Leash Dog Park Proposal - ® Motion Van Valkenburg Park. ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion RECOMMENDATION: The Park Board recommends that a portion of Van Valkenburg Park be developed into an off -leash dog park. The Park Board also recommends an annual user fee of $25 for residents and $50 for non - residents. INFO/BACKGROUND: At the April 12, 2005, Park Board meeting, a motion was made and passed unanimously to build an interim off -leash dog'park at Van Valkenburg Park contingent upon 50% of the funding coming from donations via the Edina Community Foundation. The motion also included a recommendation that there would be an'annual user fee of $25 per year for residents and $50 per year for non - residents. Since that Park Board meeting, I have received a verbal commitment from a dog owner proponent of the concept who is willing to donate $5,000 towards the fencing expenses. The current donations policy requires a minimum $5,000 donation to receive a permanent recognition plaque at the site. We have currently secured two bids for purchase and installation of fencing needed to create the off -leash dog park. We are expecting a third quote within the next few days. We anticipate that the lowest bid will be under $9,100 total, which means that the Edina Park Maintenance Department budget would have to fund a maximum of $4,100 out of our operating budget to cover the cost of fencing and installation. d Attached to this report is a copy of the Off -Leash Dog Area Feasibility Study done by Ingraham & Associates back on April 3, 2001. The study identified four areas as potential off -leash dog park areas. The Braemar Park site is not longer an option due to the development of the South Metro Training Facility. The Edina Lacrosse Association now heavily uses the Walnut Ridge Park site as an athletic field. The only remaining two sites in his study are Creek Valley Park and Van Valkenburg Park. The Minneapolis Water Works Department site near Weber Park is still not an option because the City of Minneapolis continues to be unwilling to enter into an agreement to use the property for that purpose at this time. According to Animal Control Officer, Timothy Hunter, there are 1,574 known households with dogs, and 1,765 registered dogs in the city, 549 of which are in the northwest quadrant where Van Valkenburg Park is located. Based on national statistics, Mr. Hunter suspects that Edina may -have as many as 7,000 to 8,000 dogs in Edina households. The Park Board has been working hard for the past five years to find a suitable off -leash dog park location that best serves the community. Based on community input and observation over the past several years, the Park Board and Animal Control Officer and staff believe that the time is right to offer this service. This concept and proposal is similar to a very successful off -leash dog park recently established in St. Louis Park at their Bass Lake Preserve location. In their first year of operation, they sold 133 permits and have had very few minor problems. Dog owners will be required to pick -up and properly dispose of their dog's feces. Off -leash dog permits will also require that the dog be properly licensed as required by ordinance. There will be a sign that displays the off- -leash dog park site rules, which would include: No person may bring into the off -leash area site: • A dangerous dog. • A female dog in heat. • More than three dogs at one time. • A dog that is not wearing tags showing that it is currently registered and vaccinated in compliance with Edina City Code. Any person who brings a dog into the off -leash area site shall: • Carry materials for removing and disposing of dog excreta and remove all excreta deposited by the dog in the off -leash site. • Lead the dog on a leash and retain the dog in custody when" entering and exiting the off -leash site. • Keep the dog under visual and voice control at all times while in the off - leash site. • Fill any hole that the dog digs in the off -leash site. • Remove the dog from the off -leash site at the first sign of aggression. The Park Board recommends using the Van Valkenburg Park site as identified by the consultant as an interim off -leash dog park location contingent upon donations to match or exceed 50% of the total cost of fencing; and recommends charging an annual user fee of $25 for residents and $50 for non - residents. The Park Board prefers to designate this proposal as an interim site with the understanding that it is a pilot project. The Park Board wants to reserve the right to discontinue the park's use as an off -leash dog if, for whatever reason, the initiative is not successful at that site. With assistance from the Edina Police and Animal Control Officer, staff will continually evaluate the park use and make recommendations to the Park Board on an annual basis. The intent is to consider this an interim site each year for the next two or three years, after which point it will no longer be considered an interim site. If approved by Council, this will require a change in the existing Ordinance, which currently does not permit dogs to be off -leash in Edina parks. The revised Ordinance would then be placed on the June 7, 2005, Council agenda for consideration. If approved by Council, staff will submit a purchase order request for fencing and appropriate signage. As soon as the park is in place, annual passes will go on sale and could be purchased online, by mail, or at City Hall. Off -Leash Dog Area Feasibility Study Ingraham & Associates was hired by the City of Edina to evaluate locations within the City for a potential off -leash dog area. As part of the study process meetings were held with the Edina Animal Control Officer, Braemar Golf Course staff and Edina Park staff. Site visits were made to city park and open space sites and cities and counties that operate off -leash dog park areas were contacted. The following is background information, a site -by -site comparison and our recommendations. Introduction and Background Information What is an off -leash dog area? An off-leash dog area is a defined area where dogs are allowed to play and walk off - leash. Dog areas or dog parks are designed to allow an exercise area for dogs and act as a social area for pet owners. Current city regulations require dogs to be on a leash or within a fenced yard. Off -leash dog areas can be controversial as there are perceptions of problems (noise, traffic, pet waste) from adjacent property owners and potential displacement of other recreational uses. Site selection is the key to a successful off -leash dog area/park. Dog areas/parks can also be established on a temporary basis with a periodic review to determine their suitability and performance. The dog area/park can be open to the public or can be open only to permit holders. The advantage of a permit -only system is to allow better communication with area users. The disadvantage of permit -only use is the administrative requirements for the city and the dog owner and the enforcement requirement for the city to check for valid permits. No cities or counties in Minnesota restrict use of their dog areas to residents only. Why have an off -leash dog area? There are an estimated 7,000 -8,000 dogs in Edina Approximately 6,000 households in Edina have dogs (28% of the city population). Few of these people have property large enough to allow a dog to get significant exercise. As awareness of other communities' off -leash dog exercise areas increases, citizens are asking for a local off -leash dog area Ingraham & Associates Inc. 1 City of Edina — Dog Area Feasibility Study 4/03/01 Off -leash dog areastparks provide an area for dogs to run. Some people currently use city parks, golf courses and school property to let their dog run off - leash. This is in violation of city regulations that require dogs to be on a leash or within a fenced yard area. The City Animal Control Officer issues warning and citations for violations of the leash and pick -up regulations. Citizens ask, "Where can I let my dog run off - leash ?" There is a demand for off -leash areas. Where are existing off-leash dog areas parks located? Off -leash dog parks are relatively new to Minnesota. There are off -leash dog areas/parks in Bloomington, Hennepin Parks, Ramsey County, and St. Paul. Several metro area cities are currently considering dog exercise areas. The City of Minneapolis is proposing to locate several dog parks in existing parks and on city lands. One proposed site is an off - leash dog area on Minneapolis Water Works land next to Weber Park in the northeast corner of Edina.. The site is designed to serve Minneapolis residents, but it would also serve some St. Louis Park and Edina residents. From Edina's perspective it'is not the most convenient location. What are the maintenance and enforcement requirements for an off -leash dog area? Dog areas/parks are relatively low maintenance. The level of maintenance is similar or lower than a typical public park. Emptying trash containers and periodic mowing are the main maintenance activities. Pet owners pick up dog waste and place it in trash containers. Operating experience in Minnesota shows that there are few issues, and the enforcement requirements_ are low. What are the costs of building a dog park? Constructions costs depend upon the site characteristics. Costs can range from less than $10,000 to close to $50,000 depending upon the amount of fencing and the need for a parking lot. Smaller sites will need to be fenced. If the site does not have parking, a parking lot would have to be built. Other expenses are signs and a picnic table. What are the attributes of a good off -leash dog area? ➢ A large enough area to allow dogs to obtain exercise (+ 2.5 acres is desirable). ➢ A flat open area of at least one acre. ➢ Suitable buffers or separation from adjacent uses (similar to other public park uses). ➢ Good visibility and access. ➢ Adequate parking (15 -20 spaces). ➢ A fenced area or other suitable boundaries. ➢ An involved citizen group to help set up and operate the park. ➢ Other desirable, but not essential features such restrooms and a drinking water supply. Ingraham & Associates Inc. 2 City of Edina — Dog Area Feasibility. Study 4/03/01 Candidate Site Evaluation Due to the developed nature of the city there are few options for suitable off -leash dog areas. Based on discussions with city staff and an evaluation of city land, the following sites were evaluated as potential off -leash dog areas: See the attached map for site locations. Creek Valley Park - The north portion of the park next to Highway 62. Braemar Park - The southwest corner of the park, south of the arena and within the Public Works outside storage area. Walnut Ridge Park - The central area of the park, within the loop trail. Van Valkenburg Park - The lower area near the pond in the northwest corner of the park. Located between the parking area and Lincoln Drive. See the attached maps of each site showing potential dog area locations. Site Evaluation Ingraham & Associates Inc. 3 City of Edina — Dog Area Feasibility Study 4/03/01 Creek Valley Braemar Park Walnut Van Park Ridge Park Valkenburg Park Site size 2.3 - 4.6 acres 3.5 acres 3 to 4 acres 1.7 acres (approx.) Open flat area NO POTENTIALLY YES NO Neighborhood GOOD POTENTIALLY FAIR GOOD compatibility GOOD Access and GOOD GOOD FAIR GOOD visibility Displacement NONE SOME SOME NONE of existing activities Existing SOME NONE NONE SOME fencing/barriers EXISTING Existing YES YES YES YES parking Fencing #1 =1,100 ft. 1,400 feet 1,400 feet 800 feet required and #1 = $11,000 $14,000 $14,000 $8,000 estimated cost #2 =1,900 ft. #2 = $19,000 Ingraham & Associates Inc. 3 City of Edina — Dog Area Feasibility Study 4/03/01 Recommendation The site evaluation shows that there is no one ideal location for an off -leash dog exercise area in Edina. The Creek Valley site has the best combination of features, but is an irregular site with little flat area. It has existing parking, is very visible, has convenient access and is compatible with adjacent land uses (Hwy 62, the park and school). The primary drawback is the small site size and lack of flat open terrain.. Two options exist in Creek Valley Park: #1. A linear area along the north edge of the park. The area outside the hockey and skating area is 2.3 acres and is primarily rolling terrain. The water tower would be inside the dog exercise area #2. An area located around the hockey rink and open skating rink. The area could function as a dog exercise area in the spring, summer and fall and a skating area in the winter. Dog areas are typically used in the winter so some signage, management and enforcement may be needed to prevent conflicts and dog use in the winter. Areas # 1 and #2 could be combined during the summer. The Braemar/Public Works site has the potential to be a suitable site, but it requires extensive grading, fencing and reconfiguration of the public works open storage area The area south of Braemar Boulevard would need re- grading and a fence would be required between the public works driveway, golf course and nature trail to the east and public works storage area to the south. The dog park area could be constructed as part of a re- configuration and aesthetic upgrade of the public work storage area This area is also contemplated for a regional police and fire training facility. There would not be room for the training facility, dog exercise area and the public works open storage area Walnut Ridge Park has an area in the center of the park that is suitable for dog use. The central area of the park is not used for active or programmed recreational uses. The low wet soils make turf management and active recreation use (i.e. ball fields, soccer, etc.) difficult. It would require a fence around the inside of the loop trail. The biggest drawbacks of this site are the somewhat hidden access to the neighborhood park and the location within a developed residential neighborhood. The dog use area would be approximately 200 feet from the nearest home. The northwest corner of Van Valkenburg Park has an area around a small pond that is somewhat suitable for dog use. The area is small and slopes toward the pond, but is not used for any other recreational uses. The area is located between the lower parking area and Lincoln Drive. Ingraham & Associates Inc. 4 City of Edina — Dog Area Feasibility Study 4/03/01 •l m il/' 1, r Dnn Arna Feasibility Studv ® Plannpra,& i.andarann A"MMM SITE G-S7-6� rNw � AY6z SITE #I;� ` Y ,� •�• as �• '•t•`•��., YAU,Oy COL ,f Nolen{ Off -Leash Dog Area Feasibility Study Creek Valley Park Site City of F i, Minnesota Planners & Landscape Architects March 1 X01 (612) 377 -2500 l Off -Leash Dog Area Feasibility Study City of Edina, Minnesota March 28, 2001 POTENTIAL SITE Van Valkenburg Park Site Noon{ O Zoo@ Planners & Landscape Architects (612) 377 -2500 o� Fkwf v LCNI�41'c nOM t l POTENTIAL SITE IN r; � \ a �V�i�rZAN� L_ Off -Leash Dog Area Feasibility Study City of Edina, Minnesota March 28, 2001 Walnut Ridge Park Site �7 Planners & Landscape Architects (612) 377 -2500 W r NZ NOWK �1 L agAOMJIK NWnihM X111 a QQ� u. NTIAL SITE I f \ 6 N Sro�c wrw.� ectiu,o Braemar Park Site Off -Leash Dog Area Feasibility Study City of Edina, Minnesota March 28, 2001 Ctow Domo Planners & Landscape Architects (612) 377 -2500 w91NA ow e o REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: DEBRA MANGEN CITY CLERK Date: MAY 17, 2005 Subject: TECHNICAL CORRECTION ❑ TO MARCH 1, 2005 COUNCIL MINUTES RESOLUTION NO. 2005-18 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Agenda Item V.E. Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution " ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion INFORMATIONBACKGROUND: Approve technical correction to the Minutes of the March 1, 2005, Council Meeting, Resolution No. 200548 as attached. PARCEL A was inadvertently stated as Lot 19 lying WESTERLY and should have read lying Easterly. PARCEL B was inadvertently stated as Lot 19, said Block 6 lying WESTERLY and should have read lying Easterly. 0 d 0 0 RESOLUTION NO. 2005-18 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A LOT DIVISION FOR 6920 HILLSIDE LANE AND 5524 WEST 70TH STREET City of Edina WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land constitute two separate parcels: Lot 19, Block 6, LA BUENA VISTA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. AND Lot 18, Block 6, LA BUENA VISTA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the owners of the described land desire to subdivide and combine said tracts in to the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "parcels") described as follows: PARCEL A: Lot 19, Block 6, LA BUENA VISTA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Except that part of the southerly 5.00 feet of the said Lot 19 lying easterly of the northerly extension of the east line of Lot 18, said Block 6. PARCEL B: Lot 18, Block 6, LA BUENA VISTA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Together with the southerly 5.00 feet of the Lot 19, said Block 6, lying easterly of the northerly extension of the east line of said Lot 18. WHEREAS, the requested subdivision is authorized under Code Section 810 and it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said newly created Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the Edina City Code Sections 810 and 850; NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, that the conveyance and ownership of the above described tracts of land ( "PARCEL A and PARCEL B) as separate tracts of land are hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Code Sections 850 and 81- are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but only to the extent permitted under Code Sections 810 and 850 subject to the limitations set out in Code Section 850 and said Ordinances are now waived for any other purpose or as to any other provisions thereof, and further subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent Ordinances of the City of Edina. City Hall 952 -927 -8861 I FAX 952 -826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.cofll TTY 952 - 826 -0379 Adopted this 1St day of March, 2005. ATTEST: City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of March 1, 2005, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 2 20 City Clerk �v . & + _ -;!> R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 514/2005 10:52:18 Council Check Register Page - 1 5/5/2005 -5/5/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 271649 51512005 100613 AAA 103.50 TABS FOR 26.119 110589 042205 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 13.50 TITLE FOR 27.285 110879 042805 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 117.00 271650 5/5/2005 102403 AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT 99.46 BLACK DIRT 110839 19447 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 99.46 271651 51512005 101971 ABLE HOSE & RUBBER INC. 137.54 HOSE, NOZZLES 110840 05 -03220 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 137.54 271652 5/512005 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 114.36 110629 451750 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 28.84 110630 453210 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 42.12 110742 453220 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 35.40 110743 453211 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 220.72 271653 51512005 100617 ADAMS PEST CONTROL 95.73 PEST CONTROL 110919 204669 5421.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GRILL 95.73 271654 5/5/2005 105162 ADT SECURITY SERVICES 25.02 ALARM SERVICE 110705 93395964 5111.6250 ALARM SERVICE ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 25.02 271655 515/2005 102626 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES 353.37 CONCRETE 110706 4105452 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 314.98 CONCRETE 110707 4106085 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 282.12 HANDCURB 110841 4106086 1365.6520 CONCRETE SIDEWALKS & PATH MAINTENANCE 752.32 HANDCURB 110842 4105726 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 555.29 HANDCURB 110843 4105451 1365.6520 CONCRETE SIDEWALKS & PATH MAINTENANCE 2,258.08 271656 515/2005 114821 ALLEGIANCE TELECOM CO WORLDWID 569.84 PHONE /DATA 110920 15502591 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 569.84 271657 5/512005 103357 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO 6,761.57 WIRELESS MICROPHONES 110654 SYSINVO3877 2210.6711 NEW EQUIPMENT COMMUNICATIONS R55CKREG LOG20000 51512005 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. CITY OF EDINA 39.94 CALHYPO Council Check Register 26595 5620.6545 39.94 5/5/2005 —5/5/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 169.34 SVHS TAPES 110655 INV60430 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1551.6530 6,930.91 118.60 271658 51512005 515/2005 102575 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIAT 102134 ASHWORTH INC. 54.00 PENCILS 110844 668109 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 499081 5440.5511 54.00 2,225.03 MERCHANDISE 110924 271659 51512005 102116 ANCHOR PRINTING CO. 3,048.42 378.78 CITY COUNCIL BROCHURES 110769 14215 2210.6575 PRINTING 378.78 150.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 110590 271660 5/512005 102109 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER 150.00 5/4/2005 10:52:18 Page - 2 Business Unit ADMINISTRATION CENT SVC PW BUILDING COMMUNICATIONS 2,592.00 RADIO SERVICE CONTRACT 110656 0000063435 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,592.00 271661 5/512005 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 130.96 110921 374316 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GRILL 468.90 110921 374316 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 271662 51512005 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. 39.94 CALHYPO 110922 26595 5620.6545 39.94 271663 5/512005 101677 ARMCOM DISTRIBUTING CO. 118.60 CEILING TILES 110708 64249 -00 1551.6530 118.60 271664 515/2005 102134 ASHWORTH INC. 823.39 MERCHANDISE 110923 499081 5440.5511 2,225.03 MERCHANDISE 110924 496241 5440.5511 3,048.42 271665 51512005 102660 AUDUBON INTERNATIONAL 150.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 110590 GC1689- 2005 5410.6105 150.00 271666 51512005 101954 AUGIE'S INC. 56.80 FOOD 110925 18702 5430.5510 56.80 271667 51512005 102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC. T r A-0 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH PARK REPAIR PARTS CITY HALL GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD GOLF ADMINISTRATION RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 1 4w R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/4/2005 10:52:18 Council Check Register Page - 3 5/5 /2005 --5/5/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 289.77 BATTERIES 110845 23675 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 289.77 271668 5/512005 100672 BCAITRAINING & DEVELOPMENT SEC 120.00 COURSE FEE 110591 1884 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 120.00 271669 5/5/2005 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 11.37 110631 39860800 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 118.19 110631 39860800 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 138.00 110632 33088800 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 131.66 110633 39831600 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 9.42 110634 39803800 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 101.11 110635 39856700 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,135.40 110799 33014000 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 107.00 110800 33088900 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 456.00 110984 33158800 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,208.15 271670 5/5/2005 104384 BERG, MARGO 100.00 PERFORMANCE 5/15/05 110657 050105 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 100.00 271671 5/5/2005 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 159.96 STENO BOOKS, COS 110592 3844210 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 431.08 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1.10593 3844010 5840.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 42.98 INDEX CARDS, BINDERS 110658 3848990 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 99.41 CD -R'S 110659 3846870 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 32.97 PENS 110709 3851330 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 22.36 OFFICE SUPPLIES 110710 3855300 1490.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC HEALTH 50.80 OFFICE SUPPLIES 110710 3855300 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING 62.07 OFFICE SUPPLIES 110710 3855300 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 11.13 OFFICE SUPPLIES 110846 3862020 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 39.69 OFFICE SUPPLIES 110846 3862020 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING 58.09 OFFICE SUPPLIES 110846 3862020 7410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 50.94- RETURN 110880 CM3831550 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 73.94 OFFICE SUPPLIES 110881 3749540 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 74.50 CUSTOM STAMP 110882 SA1456 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,108.04 271672 5/5/2005 104465 BEST WESTERN KELLY INN 252.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 110660 14889 1400.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL v- , -Mb CITY OF EDINA 5/4/2005 10:52:18 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 4 5/512005 —5/5/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 252.00 271673 51512005 101676 BIFFS INC 11.86 PORTABLE RESTROOM 110883 W251501 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 45.15 PORTABLE RESTROOMS 110884 W251500 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 57.01 271674 5/5/2005 104053 BIOCLEAN MOBILE WASH INC. 1,297.70 VEHICLE WASHING SERVICE 110847 51457 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,297.70 271675 5 /5/2005 100711 BLOOD, DAVID 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 110582 050505 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 271676 5/512005 105822 BLUE LINE GEAR 66.56 BATTERIES 110885 05401 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 66.56 271677 5/5/2005 117040 BOYER TRUCKS 315.54 REPAIRS 110848 514838 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 315.54 271678 515/2005 103279 BRETSON, GREG 89.97 UNIFORM PURCHASE 110594 042505 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 89.97 271679 5/5/2005 102365 BURTON GOLF INC 143.36 MERCHANDISE 110926 165280 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES — 143.36 271680 5/512005 100776 BUTLER, GEORGE 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 110580 050505 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 271681 5/5/2005 101788 CAMPBELL, RICHARD 67.97 UNIFORM PURCHASE 110661 042605 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 67.97 271682 5/5/2005 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 1,891.20 110985 40578 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,891.20 v- , -Mb CITY OF EDINA 5/4/2005 10:52:18 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 5 5/5/2005 --5/5/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 271683 5/512005 100681 CATCO 41.75 FITTINGS 110662 3 -73659 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 7.86 FITTINGS 110663 3 -73056 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 49.15 ELBOW 110664 3 -73132 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 158.54 MUD FLAPS 110849 1 -39003 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 257.30 271684 515/2005 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 251.32 TONER 110666 RT61864 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 675.20 TONER 110667 R037647 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 926.52 271685 51512005 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 37.26 110665 APR1905 7413.6582 FUEL OIL PSTF FIRE TOWER 37.26 271686 515/2005 100256 CINGULAR WIRELESS 23.09 ACCT 3312766 110927 041705 5420.6168 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 23.09 271687 51512005 101223 CITIES FORD 223.57 SHAFT & BEARING ASSEMBLIES 110668 117313WFOW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 306.41 PROCESSOR 110669 117356WFOW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 529.98 271688 5/5/2005 100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP. 125.93 PIKE POLES 110886 45395 1480.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SPECIAL OPERATIONS 125.93 271689 5/512005 113654 CMC CUSTOM GIFTS INC. 300.75 MERCHANDISE 110928 0037084 -IN 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 300.75 271690 51512005 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 287.53 GLOVES, EARMUFFS 110711 02554358 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 157.23 GAS CANS 110770 02555674 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 162.53 GLOVES 110771 02554531 1643.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL TURF CARE 607.29 271691 5/5/2005 101704 COOK, BARBARA 345.71 ADAPTIVE PROGRAMS 110887 5 -1173 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES 5/412005 10:52:18 Page- 6 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 271696 51512005 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 23.45 PULLEY - PULLER 110851 750445 1553.6556 TOOLS Council Check Register 5/5 /2005 -515/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 43.78 345.71 110930 188634 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 271692 5/512005 85.39 103485 CURT KRIENS CONSTRUCTION 110931 188640 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 3,850.00 CONCRETE WORK 110595 1063 5422.6406 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 3,850.00 20.05 BAKERY 110933 271693 5/512005 COST OF GOODS SOLD 102121 DATREK PROFESSIONAL BAGS INC 17.36 BAKERY 110934 189118 63.46 MERCHANDISE 110929 835204 5440.5511 63.46 271698 51512005 271694 5/512005 103985 DAVE'S GREAT AD SHOP 31.64 400.00 GRAPHIC DESIGN 110850 1912 2210.6103 400.00 ARNESON 110772 W05030562 1646.6188 271695 5/512005 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING HISTORICAL 110772 W05030562 1646.6188 TELEPHONE 2,004.00 110636 309921 5862.5514 99.60 110637 309922 5862.5515 268.80 110638 310463 5822.5514 571.00 110639 310462 5842.5514 1,183.10 110744 310875 5842.5514 19.80 110745 310876 5842.5515 1,370.10 110746 310874 5822.5514 320.00 110747 310409 5822.5513 941.00 110986 310407 5842.5513 6,777.40 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES 5/412005 10:52:18 Page- 6 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 271696 51512005 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 23.45 PULLEY - PULLER 110851 750445 1553.6556 TOOLS 23.45 271697 51512005 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 43.78 BAKERY 110930 188634 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 85.39 BAKERY 110931 188640 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 47.90 BAKERY 110932 188704 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 20.05 BAKERY 110933 188811 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 17.36 BAKERY 110934 189118 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 214.48 271698 51512005 102712 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION 31.64 GREENHOUSE 110772 W05030562 1646.6188 TELEPHONE 47.46 ARNESON 110772 W05030562 1646.6188 TELEPHONE 48.19 HISTORICAL 110772 W05030562 1646.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation WATER TREATMENT Council Check Register 63.35 5915.6586 515/2005 -515/2005 71.47 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 75.32 110772 W05030562 5821.6188 79.10 CARD ACCESS -PARKS W05030562 5311.6188 79.10 110772 W05030562 5210.6188 80.94 110772 W05030562 1646.6188 94.92 110772 W05030562 1550.6188 105.64 110772 W05030562 5861.6188 126.56 110772 W05030562 1481.6188 174.10 110772 W05030562 5111.6188 325.65 110772 W05030562 5841.6188 1,403.44 110772 271699 5/5/2005 TELEPHONE 101986 DIBBLE, DON W05030562 5610.6188 15.80 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 15.80 271700 515/2005 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 5,971.90 LEGAL 5,971.90 271701 5/512005 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES 2,299.29 CHEMICALS 2,952.15 CHEMICALS 1,810.94 CHEMICALS 7,062.38 271702 5/5/2005 100739 EAGLE WINE 1,972.80 1.972.80 271703 5/5/2005 100740 EARL F. ANDERSEN INC. 358.91 ZIPPER PANELS 358.91 271704 5/512005 100741 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 30.80 A 7'AA 'lr. 271705 5/5/2005 1100742 ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION DIVISI 5/4/2005 10:52:18 Page - 7 Business Unit 50TH ST OCCUPANCY POOL OPERATION GOLF DOME PROGRAM BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK FIRE STATION ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT YORK OCCUPANCY SKATING & HOCKEY ED ADMINISTRATION 110981 042905 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 110712 1229897 1195.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES 110596 CITY OF EDINA WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT Council Check Register 82700416 -05 5915.6586 515/2005 -515/2005 110852 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 110772 W05030562 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 110772 W05030562 5311.6188 TELEPHONE 110772 W05030562 5210.6188 TELEPHONE 110772 W05030562 1646.6188 TELEPHONE 110772 W05030562 1550.6188 TELEPHONE 110772 W05030562 5861.6188 TELEPHONE 110772 W05030562 1481.6188 TELEPHONE 110772 W05030562 5111.6188 TELEPHONE 110772 W05030562 5841.6188 TELEPHONE 110772 W05030562 1622.6188 TELEPHONE 110772 W05030562 5610.6188 TELEPHONE 271705 5/5/2005 1100742 ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION DIVISI 5/4/2005 10:52:18 Page - 7 Business Unit 50TH ST OCCUPANCY POOL OPERATION GOLF DOME PROGRAM BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK FIRE STATION ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT YORK OCCUPANCY SKATING & HOCKEY ED ADMINISTRATION 110981 042905 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 110712 1229897 1195.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES 110596 82700431 -05 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 110597 82700416 -05 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 110852 82700478 -05 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 110801 224298 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 110935 0064962 -IN 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 110640 325757 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 110641 325758 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 110987 325844 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA 5/4 /2005 10:52:18 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 8 5/5 /2005 —5/512005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 123.54 PEST CONTROL 110936 4533080 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 123.54 271706 51512005 106340 EDINA CAR WASH 259.86 MARCH WASHES 110598 2101 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 259.86 271707 51512005 105467 EDINA CRIME PREVENTION FUND 2,720.00 CREDIT CARD RECEIPTS 110853 042605 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 2,720.00 271708 5/512005 101630 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS 200.00 RM RESERVATION REFUND 110937 042205 5401.4553 CLUBHOUSE GOLF REVENUES 200.00 271709 51512005 116448 EGAN OIL COMPANY 14,556.72 GAS 110599 100213 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 14,556.72 271710 5/512005 101956 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANC 5,059.15 E -81 REPAIRS 110888 21400 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5,059.15 271711 51512005 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC 1,971.82 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 110670 INV702165 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,971.82 271712 515/2005 105339 ENRGI 1,468.75 WEBSITE CONSULTING 110600 2647R 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 2,125.00 WEBSITE CONSULTING 110601 2684R 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 3,253.75 WEBSITE CONSULTING 110854 2717 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 6,847.50 271713 515/2005 118152 EXPRESS PRESS 257.73 PRINTING TRAINING 110602 9797 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 257.73 271714 5/512005 102003 FASTSIGNS BLOOMINGTON 515.74 HANGING SIGNS 110938 190 -26766 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 515.74 271715 51512005 100756 FEDERAL EXPRESS 271721 5/512005 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE 85.19 COMPUTER ETHERNET HUB 110941 042905 R55CKREG LOG20000 CELL PHONE CHARGES 110942 4/29 CITY OF EDINA 271722 5/5/2005 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. Council Check Register 193.48 LIGHT BULBS 110943 908396445 34.07 SHRINK SLEEVES 5/5/2005 -5/512005 227.55 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 110749 107.96 DRUG TESTING SHIPPING 110603 5-485 -02586 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL 107.96 271716 5/512005 118153 FUTRELL FIRE CONSULT & DESIGN 2,500.00 REVIEW /CONSULTING 110671 18120 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,500.00 271717 51512005 111863 G & J PATCH AND PIN 38.25 HERITAGE AWARD PLAQUE 110855 006325 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 38.25 271718 515/2005 100781 GRAFIX SHOPPE 100.00 VEHICLE GRAPHICS 110889 40918 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 100.00 271719 5/5/2005 101103 GRAINGER 48.98 TRANSFORMER 110604 495- 077314 -5 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 44.28 PAINT, BATTERIES 110605 495- 056397 -5 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 152.08 CABLE TIES 110605 495 - 056397 -5 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 481.65 DEHUMIDIFIER 110773 495- 370001 -2 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 156.42 BROOM HANDLES, TORCHES 110856 495- 440567 -8 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 95.81 MULTIMETER 110939 498 - 855967 -2 5620.6556 TOOLS 107.08 WATER COOLERS 110940 495 - 290786 -5 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,086.30 271720 5/512005 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 271721 5/512005 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE 85.19 COMPUTER ETHERNET HUB 110941 042905 63.73 CELL PHONE CHARGES 110942 4/29 148.92 271722 5/5/2005 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 193.48 LIGHT BULBS 110943 908396445 34.07 SHRINK SLEEVES 110944 908598085 227.55 271723 51512005 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 117.85 110749 224495 4,387.68 110803 224557 5/4/2005 10:52:18 Page- 9 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL INSPECTIONS PLANNING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE EDINBOROUGH PARK MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5842.6406 5841.6188 5620.6406 5620.6406 5842.5515 5862.5512 GENERAL SUPPLIES TELEPHONE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING YORK OCCUPANCY EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/4/2005 10:52:18 Council Check Register Page - 10 5/5 /2005 —5/5/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 534.50 110804 224452 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 8.00- 110805 665039 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 38.30- 110806 664343 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 37.76- 110988 665328 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL PARKING RAMP RICHARDS GOLF COURSE PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL STORM SEWER EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BOARD & ROOM PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 4,955.97 271724 51612005 104482 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 1,167.10 REPAIR STREET LIGHTS 110606 5-4-26-1 1322.6530 1,725.00 STAIRWELL LIGHTING 110672 5 -4 -14-1 1375.6530 2,892.10 271725 5/512005 101964 GUSTAVE A. LARSON CO. 63.62 CONTROLLER 110673 BLM0088627 5430.6406 63.62 271726 51512005 102426 HALE, WILLIAM 150.00 PERFORMANCE 5/12105 110674 050105 5610.6136 150.00 271727 5/512005 100791 HALLMAN OIL COMPANY 39.83 OIL 110675 149727 1470.6406 39.83 271728 5/5/2005 103359 HANSON PIPE & PRODUCTS INC. 553.80 ADJUSTING RINGS 110857 477005378822 5932.6406 553.80 271729 5/5/2005 100792 HARMON AUTOGLASS 379.00 WINDSHIELD REPAIR 110713 1014002934 1553.6180 379.00 271730 5/5/2005 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 2,659.91 MARCH 2005 110676 000931 1195.6225 2,659.91 271731 5/512005 102460 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 10,661.96 1ST HALF ASSESSMENTS 110774 042805 1503.6915 10,661.96 271732 515/2005 106371 HENNEPIN FACULTY ASSOCIATES 2,265.17 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES 110588 050505 1470.6103 2,265.17 REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL PARKING RAMP RICHARDS GOLF COURSE PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL STORM SEWER EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BOARD & ROOM PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CITY OF EDINA 5/4/2005 10:52:18 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 11 5/5 /2005 -5/5/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 271733 51512005 116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY 9,521.10 COMPUTERS 110607 37865985 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 9,521.10 271734 5/512005 101040 HOPKINS TOWN & COUNTRY DODGE 210.50 REPAIRS 110608 46229 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 59.54 REPAIRS 110609 041505 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 6.60 ACTUATORS 110677 115710 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 254.32 REPAIRS 110714 50062 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS _ EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 259.31 REPAIRS 110715 48300 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 67.57 SWITCH 110890 115982 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 857.84 271735 5/5/2005 103333 HORSTMANN, NILEEN 53.00 TRIP REFUND 110858 042705 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS SENIOR CITIZENS 53.00 271736 515/2005 101426 HUGHES, GORDON 279.45 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 111007 050205 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION 279.45 271737 5/5/2005 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 102.26 PVC PIPE & FITTINGS 110716 387245 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 102.26 271738 5/5/2005 116188 INTERNATIONAL PLAY COMPANY 247.44 A.P. STEPS 110945 IPC6254 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 247.44 271739 51512005 103193 INTOXIMETERS INC. 191.70 INTOX MOUTHPIECES 110678 166928 1400.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 191.70 271740 515/2005 101861 J.H. LARSON COMPANY 15.62 COUPLING, ADAPTERS 110717 4473997 -01 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 15.62 271741 515/2005 101400 JAMES, WILLIAM F 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 110586 050505 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 CITY OF EDINA 5/4/2005 10:52:18 R55CKREG LOG20000 Coundl Check Register Page - 12 5/5/2005 -515/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 271742 515/2005 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 2,641.17 110642 1887061 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 236.45 110643 1887065 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 83.80- 110644 278264 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 29.90- 110645 278937 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 78.80- 110646 278938 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 30.94 110750 1887072 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 7.48- 110751 279395 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 480.90 110807 1890474 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 268.45 110808 1890473 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 601.80 110809 1890476 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 368.20 110810 1890470 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 386.50- 110811 279516 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 114.45 110989 1890475 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 468.85 110990 1890472 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 120.95 110991 1890481 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,180.34 110992 1890478 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6,926.02 271743 51512005 100838 K & K SALES INC. 776.39 ELECTRIC STRIKES 110775 69959 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 776.39 271744 5/512005 100839 KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES 60.64 BEARING CONES & CUPS 110718 M564745 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 60.64 271745 5/5/2005 111018 KEEPRS INC. 192.00 POLO SHIRTS 110891 36231 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 275.85 UNIFORM 110892 34854 -01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 246.90 UNIFORM 110893 33204 -04 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 26.00 UNIFORM 110894 33204 -80 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 740.75 271746 51512005 113212 KENDELL DOORS & HARDWARE INC. 90.00 KEYS COPIED 110610 41434 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 90.00 271747 51512005 114558 KESTREL DESIGN GROUP INC., THE 4,440.60 LANDSCAPE SERVICES 110719 2287 04308.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN STS 308 4,440.60 CITY OF EDINA 5/4/2005 10:52:18 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 13 5/512005 —5/5/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 271748 5/512005 102474 KRULL, JULIE 46.98 UNIFORM PURCHASE 110611 042505 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 46.98 271749 515/2005 100846 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO 1,232.00 110752 433747 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,232.00 271750 51512005 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 254.84 SEALANT, GASKET MAKER 110859 3144006 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 254.84 271751 515/2005 100853 LEEF SERVICES 32.23 SHOP TOWELS 110612 375643 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE 6 GROUNDS 32.23 271752 51512005 106301 LOFFLER COMPANIES INC. 56.00 COPIER USAGE 110613 113707 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 56.00 271753 5/5/2005 100858 LOGIS 31.00 110730 25128,138 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,178.00 110730 25128,138 2210.6160 DATA PROCESSING COMMUNICATIONS 2,242.00 110730 25128,138 1120.6160 DATA PROCESSING ADMINISTRATION 2,355.00 110730 25128,138 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING INSPECTIONS 2,484.00 110730 25128,138 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 3,956.00 110730 25128,138 5910.6160 DATA PROCESSING GENERAL (BILLING) 4,644.00 110730 25128,138 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING" ASSESSING 5,092.25 110730 25128,138 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 21,982.25 271754 5/512005 102722 LYNN PEAVEY COMPANY 732.52 PROPERTY ROOM SUPPLIES 110679 112799 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 732.52 271755 51512005 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1,577.76 110647 177284 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,228.46 110648 178531 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,806.22 271756 515/2005 100864 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. 2,253.54 BROOM SETS 110720 2053061 1310.6523 BROOMS STREET CLEANING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/5/2005 —5/5/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 2,480.39 BROOM SETS 110895 2053310 1310.6523 BROOMS LAUNDRY 5/4/2005 10:52:18 Page - 14 Business Unit STREET CLEANING POOL OPERATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH PARK CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS GENERAL SUPPLIES ED ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 4,733.93 271757 515 12005 101371 MACHOLDA, ED 3,110.85 LIFEGUARD UNIFORMS 110860 042605 5311.6201 3,110.85 271758 515/2005 100868 MARK VII SALES 511.50 110649 786903 5862.5514 1,437.15 110753 789097 5842.5514 1,674.50 110993 791497 5842.5514 3,623.15 271759 515/2005 101030 MATHISON CO. 56.75 PAPER 110721 599420 -0 5120.5510 449.44 ART SUPPLIES 110722 598950 -0 5120.5510 506.19 271760 51512005 102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC 62.50 SPEED DIALS 110680 24223 1550.6188 62.50 VOICE MAIL MAINT 110946 24373 1550.6188 125.00 271761 51512005 100875 MCCAREN DESIGNS INC. 1,535.73 PLANTS 110947 30728 5620.6620 1,535.73 271762 51512005 111825 MCGUIRE MECHANICAL SERVICES IN 221.63 LEAK REPAIR 110614 2515 1551.6180 221.63 271763 51512005 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 2,288.50 MAY O5 TRIP 110861 042505 1628.6103.07 2,288.50 271764 5/512005 103720 MEDTECH 2,151.25 WRISTBANDS 110948 IN000128531 5610.6406 2,151.25 271765 51512005 100953 MEDTRONIC PHYSIO CONTROL CORP. 600.00 LIFEPAK MAINTENANCE 110896 PC640006 1470.6215 913.79 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 110897 PC637421 1470.6510 LAUNDRY 5/4/2005 10:52:18 Page - 14 Business Unit STREET CLEANING POOL OPERATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH PARK CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS GENERAL SUPPLIES ED ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CITY OF EDINA 5/412005 10:52:18 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 15 5/5/2005 -5/5/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1.513.79 271766 5/5/2005 103232 MEHA 30.00 DUES - E. MARSTON 110979 050205 1490.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PUBLIC HEALTH 30.00 271767 515/2005 101483 MENARDS 39.14 MULCH 110862 17786 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 93.76 ADHESIVE, CONCRETE 110863 17689 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 9.81 PUTTY KNIFE, TAPE 110664 17691 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 142.71 271768 5/5/2005 101987 MENARDS 25.23 SOCKETS, ADAPTERS 110949 79437 5620.6556 TOOLS EDINBOROUGH PARK 90.35 FERTILIZER, SEED 110950 82895 5620.6540 FERTILIZER EDINBOROUGH PARK 49.86 COVEBASE, ADHESIVE 110951 83058 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 26.47 DROP CLOTH, TAPE 110952 84861 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 191.91 271769 5/512005 100881 MERFELD, BURT 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 110581 050505 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 271770 51512005 100882 MERIT SUPPLY 489.37 MOPHEADS, RED PADS 110865 66780 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 111.72 FLOOR SEALER, PADS 110898 66727 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 601.09 271771 51512005 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 50.69 TENNIS NET STRAPS 110776 82329 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 51.07 PITCHING RUBBER 110777 82250 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 101.76 271772 51512005 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAI 1,068.77 REPAIRS 110723 FOCS96194 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 788.30 REPAIRS 110724 FOCS95444 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 100.00 REPAIRS 110725 FOCS95785 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,957.07 271773 5/5/2005 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY 892.52 CLEANERS 116726 23443 1551.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 892.52 CITY OF EDINA 514/2005 10:52:18 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 16 515/2005 -5/5/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 271774 515/2005 100692 MIDWEST COCA -COLA EAGAN 279.45 110650 63639143 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 60.50 110754 82518213 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 339.95 271775 5/5/2005 100895 MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL CORPOR 79.21 TOOL REPAIR 110866 4974835 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 79.21 271776 5/512005 100913 MINNEAPOLIS SUBURBAN SEWER &W 1,700.00 WATER MAIN REPAIR 110681 32658 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1,360.00 WATER MAIN REPAIR 110682 32660 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1,700.00 WATER MAIN REPAIR 110683 32659 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 4,760.00 271777 51512005 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 250.00 PLAN REVIEW FEE 110899 042905 5915.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS WATER TREATMENT 250.00 271778 5/512005 101686 MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL BEVERAGE A 369.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 110778 042805 5840.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 369.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 110779 042705 5840.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 738.00 271779 51512005 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. 63.90 ASPHALT EMULSION 110867 47439 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,065.00 ASPHALT EMULSION 110868 47498 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,128.90 271780 51512005 108537 MOORE, JOEL 303.82 UNIFORM PURCHASE 110684 042605 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 303.82 271781 51512005 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 1,256.06 IRRIGATION PARTS 110615 457051 -00 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 46.13- SEAL RETURN 110616 457111 -00 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 364.82 PUMP CASE 110617 455899 -00 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,574.75 271782 51512005 105015 MYKENNAS CAFE 214.94 BOARD MEETING LUNCHEON 110685 3536 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 5/4/2005 10:52:18 Page - 17 Business Unit GENERAL STORM SEWER POOL OPERATION GENERAL STORM SEWER RESERVE PROGRAM POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING GOLF ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 5/5/2005 —5/5/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 214.94 271783 515/2005 100012 NATIONAL WATERWORKS INC. 150.55 PIPE & BEND 110686 2271813 5932.6535 PIPE 150.55 271784 51512005 101868 NBGS INTERNATIONAL 212.00 PAINT 110900 0000005446 5311.6532 PAINT 212.00 271785 51512005 105928 NEENAH FOUNDRY COMPANY 1,897.83 FRAMES, GRATES 110869 764647 5932.6536 CASTINGS 1,897.83 271786 515/2005 100724 NISSEN, DICK 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 110585 050505 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.00 271787 51512005 117830 NORTHLAND BUSINESS SYSTEMS 5,246.19 OLYMPUS DIGITAL RECORDERS 110901 64618 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 5,246.19 271788 5/5/2005 102652 NORTHLAND CHEMICAL CORP. 131.20 CLEANING LIQUIDS 110618 89458 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 131.20 271789 5/512005 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 18.59 PAPER 110953 286206089 -001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 18.59 271790 515/2005 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 109.44 CHAIN, RATCHET BINDER 110780 334099 1646.6556 TOOLS 155.93 SHACKLES 110781 334119 1646.6556 TOOLS 58.86 HAND TOOLS 110870 334363 1553.6556 TOOLS 324.23 271791 51512005 115669 ON CALL SERVICES 1,500.00 TODDLER EVENT FOR A.P. 110954 1145 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 150.00 A.P. STEP INSTALLATION 110955 1146 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,650.00 271792 5/5/2005 118166 OWENS, AMY 5/4/2005 10:52:18 Page - 17 Business Unit GENERAL STORM SEWER POOL OPERATION GENERAL STORM SEWER RESERVE PROGRAM POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING GOLF ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK 514/2005 10:52:18 Page - 18 Business Unit SENIOR CITIZENS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 200.00 110982 CITY OF EDINA 1281.6104 R55CKREG LOG20000 TRAINING 2,142.25 110982 4/26/05 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN Council Check Register 2,342.25 5/5/2005 -5/5/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 16.00 MEMBERSHIP PAID TWICE 110871 042805 1628.4392.01 SR CENTER MEMBERSHIP 8068001 -IN 16.00 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 901.40 271793 5/5/2005 110756 100941 PARK NICOLLET CLINIC 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 394.00 PHYSICALS, TESTING 110687 041505 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 449.00 PHYSICALS, TESTING 110687 041505 1470.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS 8067824 -CM 843.00 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 9.33 271794 51512005 110994 101718 PARTS PLUS 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 514/2005 10:52:18 Page - 18 Business Unit SENIOR CITIZENS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 200.00 110982 4/26/05 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 2,142.25 110982 4/26/05 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,342.25 271795 51512005 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 20.50 110755 8068001 -IN 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 901.40 110756 8067999 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,088.40 110812 80679984N 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 240.00- 110813 8067824 -CM 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 9.33 110994 8067830 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,041.49 110995 8068000 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 198.00- 110996 8067818 -CM 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,623.12 271796 5/5/2005 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 1,020.00 110956 78902320 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 1,020.00 271797 5/512005 103512 PETTY CASH 32.62 PETTY CASH CHECKBOOK 110974 042905 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 120.31 PETTY CASH CHECKBOOK 110974 042905 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 123.95 PETTY CASH CHECKBOOK 110974 042905 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 148.20 PETTY CASH CHECKBOOK 110974 042905 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 182.00 PETTY CASH CHECKBOOK 110974 042905 1400.6106 MEETING EXPENSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 265.50 PETTY CASH CHECKBOOK 110974 042905 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 872.58 271798 51512005 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 477.70 110814 2191377 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,237.20 110815 2191376 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 33.60 110816 2191375 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 7.61- 110817 3316468 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING P8.95- 110818 3316466 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation 118.95 - 81.65- 6.90- 20.00- 8.67- 147.15- 18.00- 9.65- 80.00- 1,092.48 34.25 100.70 1 All sn 271799 5/5/2005 102156 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 110651 51400 271800 CITY OF EDINA 5/4/2005 10:52:18 Council Check Register Page - 19 SEWER INSPECTIONS 5/5 /2005 -5/512005 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 110819 3316697 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 110820 3316696 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 110821 3316616 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 110822 3316613 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 110823 3316738 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 110824 3317044 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 110825 3316467 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 110826 3316469 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 110827 3316462 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 110997 2191379 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 110998 2191380 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 110999 2191383 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 111000 2186717 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 111001 2191381 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 110651 51400 271800 5/5/2005 100956 PIPE SERVICES CORP 1,947.50 SEWER INSPECTIONS 110619 2005019 2,665.00 SEWER INSPECTIONS 110619 2005019 4,612.50 271801 51512005 101110 POLLY NORMAN PHOTOGRAPHY 125.00 ABOUT TOWN PHOTOS 110620 042105 125.00 271802 5/5/2005 102350 POLO RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION 539.44 MERCHANDISE 110957 119823 539.44 271803 515/2005 100819 POPP TELECOM 4,000.00 50% PMT ON TELEPHONE SYS 110872 PO 2322 210.41 PHONE SERVICE 110958 75827 366.00 RUN NEW PHONE LINE 110959 75773 4,576.41 271804 5/5/2005 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 2,273.08 110757 208493 754.61 110828 224559 5842.5515 5932.6103 5923.6136 2210.6123 5440.5511 5600.1720 5420.6180 5841.6180 5842.5513 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL STORM SEWER PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER COLLECTION SYSTEMS MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES BUILDINGS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE EB /CL BALANCE SHEET CLUB HOUSE YORK OCCUPANCY YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING CITY OF EDINA 5/4/2005 10:52:18 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 20 5/5 /2005 -5/5/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 23.83- 110829 664956 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 177.70 111002 224299 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 77.25 111003 225892 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 77.25 111004 226129 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 3,336.06 271805 51512005 100971 QUALITY WINE 55.07- 110758 544763 -00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 2,773.30 110758 544763 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 80.92- 110759 539647 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 10.58- 110760 540148 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 31.09- 110830 544764 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 1,566.75 110830 544764 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2.24- 110831 544964 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 223.80 110831 544964 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2.39- 110832 543574 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 249.57 110832 543574 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 6.94- 110833 544889 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 704.29 110833 544889 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 7.18- 110834 544618 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 361.89 110834 544618 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5,683.19 271806 51512005 101965 OWEST 111.79 952 920 -8166 110727 8166 -4/05 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 111.79 271807 51512005 102131 R.O.T.A. 100.00 ANNUAL DUES 110688 1332 1419.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 271808 5/512005 113422 RAKE PUBLISHING INC. 153.33 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 110960 6113 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 153.33 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 110960 6113 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 153.34 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 110960 6113 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 460.00 271809 515/2005 104642 RCM SPECIALTIES INC. 1,890.00 PATCHER SERVICE 110728 2660 1314.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS STREET RENOVATION 1,600.00 PATCHER SERVICE 110729 2658 1301.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 3,490.00 5/4/2005 10:52:18 Page- 21 Business Unit CITY HALL GENERAL PSTF OCCUPANCY ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GRILL COMMUNICATIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL STORM SEWER STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION SENIOR CITIZENS PARKING RAMP CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 5/5/2005 -515/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 271810 51512005 118155 RENEWAL BY ANDERSON 111.41 PERMIT REFUND 110731 ED032396 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS 111.41 271811 515/2005 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 244.95 FAUCET REPAIR 110961 39263 1551.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 244.95 271812 515/2005 114489 RICOH CORPORATION 58.50 COPIER SERVICE CONTRACT 110962 F042600226 -21 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 58.50 271813 5/512005 100982 ROTO- ROOTER 581.87 TOILET REPAIR 110782 04810614688 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 581.87 271814 5/512005 101634 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPANY 36.64 BAKERY 110963 123899 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 36.64 271815 515/2005 104788 SANDY'S PROMOTIONAL STUFF 189.04 PW OPEN HOUSE ITEMS 110689 SH5062 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 189.04 271816 5/512005 118168 SCAN HEALTH INC. 995.00 ACTIVATION FEES 110903 INV001679 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING 995.00 271817 515/2005 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 484.71 DOOR 110621 40072158 5422.6577 LUMBER 33.59 LUMBER 110783 40073525 1646.6577 LUMBER 80.06 LUMBER 110873 40077330 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 348.73 LUMBER 110874 40076525 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 100.11 STAKES 110875 40075557 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,047.20 271818 5/512005 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. 519.81 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 110876 8101283151 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 510.54 OTRLY MAINTENANCE 110983 8101284349 1375.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,030.35 2711819 5/512005 101577 SCHMOLL, RUTH 5/4/2005 10:52:18 Page- 21 Business Unit CITY HALL GENERAL PSTF OCCUPANCY ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GRILL COMMUNICATIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL STORM SEWER STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION SENIOR CITIZENS PARKING RAMP R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/5 /2005 -5/512005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 242.15 PETTY CASH 110904 042805 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN 5/4/2005 10:52:18 Page- 22 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING DISTRIBUTION COLLECTION SYSTEMS STREET NAME SIGNS GENERAL STORM SEWER TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO ST PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO WM PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO SS GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 242.15 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 271820 51512005 50TH ST SELLING 105550 SCRAP METAL PROCESSORS INC. 50TH ST SELLING 150.00 APRIL CONTAINER CHARGE 110622 D- COE54 1552.6406 150.00 271821 51512005 100995 SEH 301.00 CONSULTING 110732 0128324 5913.6103 574.75 CONSULTING 110732 0128324 5923.6136 816.00 CONSULTING 110732 0128324 1325.6103 903.00 CONSULTING 110732 0128324 5932.6103 495.86 STRUCTURAL REVIEW 110733 0128634 5914.6103 6,000.00 FEASIBILITY STUDY 110734 0128704 04297.1705.20 15,229.54 FEASIBILITY STUDY 110734 0128704 05436.1705.20 15,229.54 FEASIBILITY STUDY 110734 0128704 03413.1705.20 39,549.69 271822 515/2005 103460 SNAP -ON TOOLS 127.80 REPAIRS 110690 136152 1553.6406 127.80 271823 5/512005 101002 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS INC 27.70 110761 164265 5842.5515 4,593.60 110762 164264 5842.5514 502.55 110763 163893 5822.5514 13.85 110764 164258 5822.5515 960.80 110765 164259 5822.5514 6,098.50 271824 51512005 116856 SPRINT 1,088.92 0524159777 -2 110905 041505 1400.6160 1,088.92 271825 51512005 101004 SPS COMPANIES 36.10 URINAL REPAIR KIT 110735 51222844.001 1551.6530 52.72 P -TRAP, TUBING 110784 S1223249.001 1646.6406 30.53 HAND CLEANER, SCREWS & CLIPS 110785 S1223216.001 1646.6406 86.40 SPOUT OUTLET 110786 S1222296.001 1646.6406 148.86 TOILET REPAIR PARTS 110964 51212872.001 5620.6530 354.61 GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN 5/4/2005 10:52:18 Page- 22 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING DISTRIBUTION COLLECTION SYSTEMS STREET NAME SIGNS GENERAL STORM SEWER TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO ST PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO WM PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO SS GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS CITY HALL GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE REPAIR PARTS EDINBOROUGH PARK R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/5/2005 --5/5/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 271826 5/5/2005 101016 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 1,389.90 PRELIM DESIGN 110736 5211 -5 07091.1705.20 711.38 SIGNAL REVISION 110787 5356 -1 06038.1705.20 2,101.28 271827 5/5 12005 101569 ST. CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY 395.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 110623 LEEDS023 1400.6104 395.00 271828 51512005 103283 ST. CROIX RECREATION CO INC 1,148.07 PICNIC TABLES 110788 14196 1647.6406 2,499.56 PICNIC TABLES 110789 14195 1647.6406 3,647.63 271829 5/512005 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC 227.41 REPAIRS 110737 SF02629 1553.6180 227.41 271830 5/5/2005 103265 STAN MORGAN & ASSOCIATES INC 410.82 SHELVING 110790 52761 5842.6406 410.82 271831 5/5/2005 101015 STREICHERS 2,150.35 SQUAD EQUIPMENT 110624 1262519 1400.6710 870.85 TRAINING AMMO 110691 1252885 1400.6551 830.70 PELICAN CASES 110692 1262936 1400.6710 166.14 PELICAN CASES 110693 1262210 1400.6710 4,345.20 PELICAN CASES, GUN SIGHTS 110694 1261907 1400.6710 119.95 BOOTS 110906 1260562 1470.6558 12.73 PAGER HOLDER 110907 1264095 1470.6406 73.90 UNIFORM 110980 1257174 1470.6558 8,569.82 271832 51512005 117180 STUMP BUSTERS 175.00 STUMP REMOVAL 110908 5022 1470.6180 175.00 271833 5/512005 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. 97.17 TIRES 110909 10035811 1553.6583 162.95 TRAILER TIRES 110910 10036103 1553.6583 260.12 Subledger Account Description CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN 51412005 10:52:18 Page - 23 Business Unit SIDEWALK INTERLACHEN /BLAKE TS -30 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT AMMUNITION EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT DEPT UNIFORMS GENERAL SUPPLIES DEPT UNIFORMS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY OF EDINA 5/4/2005 10:52:18 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 24 5/5/2005 -5/5/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 271834 5/5/2005 102140 SUN MOUNTAIN SPORTS INC. 186.35 MERCHANDISE 110965 554797 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 128.30 MERCHANDISE 110966 555865 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 44.90 MERCHANDISE 110967 554682 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 359.55 271835 5/512005 101167 SUPERIOR FORD 20,896.00 2005 CROWN VICTORIA 110911 17936 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 20,896.00 2005 CROWN VICTORIA 110912 17937 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 20,896.00 2005 CROWN VICTORIA 110913 17938 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 20,896.00 2005 CROWN VICTORIA 110914 17939 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 20,896.00 2005 CROWN VICTORIA 110915 17940 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 20,896.00 2005 CROWN VICTORIA 110916 17941 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 20,896.00 2005 CROWN VICTORIA 110917 17942 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 146,272.00 271836 5/512005 100794 SWANSON, HAROLD 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 110584 050505 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 271837 51512005 111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC. 35.00 BEERLINE CLEANING 110968 257919 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL 35.00 271838 51512005 101027 TARGET 29.80 ACCT 9- 333 -725 -530 110969 041805 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 29.80 271839 51512005 118157 TESSCO TECHNOLOGIES 504.95 CRIMP TOOL KIT 110738 321401 5913.6556 TOOLS DISTRIBUTION 504.95 271840 515120.05 101029 TESSMAN SEED CO. 1,267.78 BALLFIELD SUPPLIES 110793 S056873 -IN 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 39.62 BALLFIELD SUPPLIES 110794 S056955 -IN 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 1,228.16 BALLFIELD SUPPLIES 110795 S056956 -IN 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 2,535.56 271841 51512005 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 3,912.70 110652 369928 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 55.00 110653 369929 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 580.00 110970 17292 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/5/2005 --5/5/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5/4/2005 10:52:18 Page - 25 Business Unit COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CONSULTING INSPECTION CRAFT SUPPLIES LS-26 LIFT STATION 14 ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIELD MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE REPAIR PARTS POOL OPERATION FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL SOD & BLACK DIRT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 4,547.70 271842 51512005 101474 TITLEIST 2,422.20 GOLF BALLS 110971 2110144 5440.5511 1,128.80 GOLF BALLS 110972 2109091 5440.5511 3,551.00 271843 51512005 102742 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLAN 286.58 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION 110739 000200501388 10026.1705.21 286.58 271844 5/512005 118158 TONKA MEDICAL SUPPLIES INC. 80.00 VINYL GLOVES 110741 255059 5110.6564 80.00 271845 51512005 117992 TOSHIBA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 18.53 COPIER MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 110695 1104479 1400.6230 18.53 271846 5/512005 101374 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE 1,325.00 BATTING CAGE REPAIRS 110791 17949 1642.6180 1,325.00 271847 5/512005 118156 TREAKLE, DONALD 36.00 MODEL FEE 110740 042604 5110.6103 36.00 271848 5/512005 100682 TRUGREEN - CHEMLAWN 195.00 TURF TREATMENT 110792 252391 1644.6103 195.00 271849 51512005 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE 40.80 LATCH SET 110796 109091 5311.6530 40.80 271850 5/5/2005 102255 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO 142.00 OXYGEN 110918 824259 1470.6510 142.00 271851 5/512005 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 340.80 SEED 110625 11711 5422.6543 340.80 5/4/2005 10:52:18 Page - 25 Business Unit COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CONSULTING INSPECTION CRAFT SUPPLIES LS-26 LIFT STATION 14 ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIELD MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE REPAIR PARTS POOL OPERATION FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL SOD & BLACK DIRT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CITY OF EDINA 5/4/2005 10:52:18 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 26 5/5 /2005 -515/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 271852 5/5/2005 105543 VAN DE CROMMERT, CLAIRE 100.00 PERFORMANCE 5 /10105 110696 050105 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 100.00 271853 51512005 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 403.85 BAGS 110797 579002 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 111.56 TOWELS, TISSUE 110798 578990 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 515.41 271854 51512005 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS 8.01 110626 3601585612 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 8.09 110626 3601585612 1140.6188 TELEPHONE PLANNING 8.09 110626 3601585612 1190.6188 TELEPHONE ASSESSING 8.09 110626 3601585612 1490.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH 27.67 110626 3601585612 1495.6188 TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS 58.16 110626 3601585612 2210.6188 TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS 59.40 110626 3601585612 1120.6188 TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION 93.23 110626 3601585612 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 114.78 110626 3601585612 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 147.43 110626 3601585612 1600.6188 TELEPHONE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 511.94 110697 3601588627 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1.044.89 271855 515/2005 101064 VESSCO INC. 101.79 SAFETY VALVES 110877 33606 5911.6530 REPAIR PARTS PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER 101.79 271856 515/2005 102218 VINTAGE ONE WINES 43.40 111005 9509 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 43.40 271857 51512005 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 47.10 LAMPS 110627 15012757 -00 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 47.10 271858 51512005 101080 WALSH, WILLIAM 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 110583 050505 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 271859 51512005 103266 WELSH COMPANIES LLC n 593.65 MAY MAINTENANCE 110628 050105 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/5/2005 -5/5/2005 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5822.5513 5842.5513 5822.5513 5822.5513 5862.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 1553.6530 5424.6590 1419.6102 1321.6185 5210.6185 1322.6185 5620.6185 5111.6185 1551.6185 5511.6185 5914.6185 1646.6185 1400.6406 1400.6406 5/4/2005 10:52:18 Page - 27 Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 593.65 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 271860 515/2005 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE LIGHT & POWER ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT LIGHT & POWER 370.40 LIGHT & POWER 110766 114358 -00 TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 5.67- BUILDING MAINTENANCE 110767 113829 -00 GENERAL SUPPLIES 18.00- 110768 113872 -00 346.73 271861 51512005 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 750.51 110836 123127 36.95- 110837 24274 5.00- 110838 24234 1,931.89 111006 123128 2,640.45 271862 5/512005 112954 WISCONSIN TURF EQUIPMENT CORP. 333.32 PUSHARM ASSEMBLY 110878 513127 -000 333.32 271863 5/5/2005 101082 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY 939.23 PLASTIC PAILS 110973 116298 939.23 271864 5/512005 101087 WROBLESKI, HENRY 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 110587 050505 100.00 271865 5/512005 101726 XCEL ENERGY 52.97 51- 4420190 -3 110698 24786188 1,176.71 51- 6223269 -1 110699 24837843 44.38 51- 4197645 -8 110700 24782248 8,445.75 51- 6644819 -9 110701 24848645 906.75 51- 5107681 -4 110702 24806374 6,567.32 51- 6955679 -8 110975 25308561 18,705.00 51- 4888627 -1 110976 25323048 532.09 51- 5847121 -5 110977 25145626 637.69 51- 6121102 -5 110978 25172134 37,068.66 271866 515/2005 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 370.62 TONER 110703 190912481 83.07 STAPLES 110704 190912482 5822.5513 5842.5513 5822.5513 5822.5513 5862.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 1553.6530 5424.6590 1419.6102 1321.6185 5210.6185 1322.6185 5620.6185 5111.6185 1551.6185 5511.6185 5914.6185 1646.6185 1400.6406 1400.6406 5/4/2005 10:52:18 Page - 27 Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING REPAIR PARTS RANGE BALLS CONTRACTUAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN RANGE RESERVE PROGRAM LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL LIGHT & POWER EDINBOROUGH PARK LIGHT & POWER ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENERAL LIGHT & POWER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS LIGHT & POWER TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 271867 51512005 Amount Vendor / Explanation 453.69 536,469.43 Grand Total CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 51512005 —5/5/2005 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 111008 043005 111008 043005 111008 043005 111008 043005 111008 043005 111008 043005 111008 043005 111008 043005 111008 043005 111008 043005 111008 043005 1400.6553 1400.6106 1400.6406 1400.6405 1400.6575 1400.6203 1400.6203 1400.6107 1400.6106 1400.6406 1400.6104 Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 536,469.43 Total Payments 536,469.43 PRISONER MEALS MEETING EXPENSE GENERAL SUPPLIES BOOKS & PAMPHLETS PRINTING UNIFORM ALLOWANCE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE MEETING EXPENSE GENERAL SUPPLIES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 5/4/2005 10:52:18 Page - 28 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 103512 PETTY CASH 4.57 POLICE PETTY CASH BOX 4.75 POLICE PETTY CASH BOX 8.00 POLICE PETTY CASH BOX 9.25 POLICE PETTY CASH BOX 10.45 POLICE PETTY CASH BOX 13.41 POLICE PETTY CASH BOX 14.00 POLICE PETTY CASH BOX 63.25 POLICE PETTY CASH BOX 97.47 POLICE PETTY CASH BOX 123.94 POLICE PETTY CASH BOX 264.17 POLICE PETTY CASH BOX 613.26 536,469.43 Grand Total CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 51512005 —5/5/2005 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 111008 043005 111008 043005 111008 043005 111008 043005 111008 043005 111008 043005 111008 043005 111008 043005 111008 043005 111008 043005 111008 043005 1400.6553 1400.6106 1400.6406 1400.6405 1400.6575 1400.6203 1400.6203 1400.6107 1400.6106 1400.6406 1400.6104 Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 536,469.43 Total Payments 536,469.43 PRISONER MEALS MEETING EXPENSE GENERAL SUPPLIES BOOKS & PAMPHLETS PRINTING UNIFORM ALLOWANCE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE MEETING EXPENSE GENERAL SUPPLIES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 5/4/2005 10:52:18 Page - 28 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 5/5/2005 - 515/2005 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 300,136.10 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 15,938.05 04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND 1,389.90 05100 ART CENTER FUND 4,379.60 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 1,252.03 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 3,435.12 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 18,780.92 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 19,286.87 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 19,892.34 05800 LIQUOR FUND 81,810.86 05900 UTILITY FUND 52,090.88 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 17,353.07 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 723.69 Report Totals 536,469.43 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and procedures Fi City 51412005 11:09:40 Page - 1 . flft-2-M R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/11/2005 8:02:59 Council Check Register Page - 1 5/5/2005 - 5/12/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 271868 51512005 100231 MINNESOTA POST BOARD 90.00 LICENSE 111300 050405 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 90.00 271869 5112/2005 102043 A LAPOINTE SIGN INC. 469.51 NAME TAGS 111243 13794 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 469.51 271870 5/1212005 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 53.40 111009 453208 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 60.68 111010 453248 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 27.46 111011 453249 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 29.52 111198 453259 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 171.06 271871 511212005 104249 ADOLPH KIEFER AND ASSOC. 300.00 BABY CHANGING STATION 111301 000842492 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 300.00 271872 511212005 103357 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO 40.00 SERVICE CALL 111244 SVCINV04631 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 40.00 271873 511212005 118171 AMERICAN PRESSURE INC. 921.22 PRESSURE WASHER 111080 44803 5431.6556 TOOLS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 921.22 271874 511212005 101115 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER 534.89 111302 6200 -4/05 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 428.98 111303 464/05 1551.6201 LAUNDRY CITY HALL GENERAL 102.50 111304 35314 -4/05 5861.6201 LAUNDRY VERNON OCCUPANCY 39.67 111305 353344/05 5821.6201 LAUNDRY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 102.76 111306 35320 -4/05 5841.6201 LAUNDRY YORK OCCUPANCY 96.21 111307 590564/05 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 200.96 111367 168134/05 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL 40.60 111368 3695 -4/05 5210.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GOLF DOME PROGRAM 1,546.57 271875 511212005 101601 AMUNDSON, ERIK 270.00 TRAINING CONFERENCE 111369 050405 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 270.00 CITY OF EDINA 5/11/2005 8:02:59 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 2 5/5/2005 - 5/12/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 271876 511212005 100595 ANOKA COUNTY 117.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 111370 050605 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 117.00 271877 511212005 101977 ARCH WIRELESS 10.96 PAGER 111371 A6096083E 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 10.96 271878 511212005 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 103.88 REFUSEIRECYCLING 111245 050205 7411.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL PSTF OCCUPANCY 103.88 271879 511212005 101954 AUGIE'S INC. 60.09 FOOD 111246 19065 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 60.09 271880 5/1212005 100638 BACHMAN'S 62.30 FLOWERS 111448 042005 5400.2072 MEN'S CLUB GOLF BALANCE SHEET 174.02 CRABAPPLE TREE 111448 042005 1509.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DEER CONTROL 236.32 271881 5/1212005 100639 BAILEY NURSERIES 55.06 PLANTINGS 111308 INVO126906 1643.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES GENERAL TURF CARE 55.06 271882 5/12/2005 116151 BCA - BTS 90.00 RECERTIFICATION CLASS 111372 4054109,4054563 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 90.00 271883 511212005 102257 BEACHS AWARDS 239.90 PLAQUES 111247 042605 5430.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 239.90 271884 5112/2005 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 135.62 111012 39888400 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 584.34 111013 33159100 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,665.00 111013 33159100 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 103.92 111014 39888500 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 194.82 111015 39803900 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,704.00 111449 33216600 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,685.95 111450 33216500 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 8f R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/5/2005 -- 5/12/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 271885 511212005 118185 BENDER, ANDREA 22999 WEBSITE GRAPHICS 111177 100 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT 5/11/2005 8:02:59 Page- 3 Business Unit COMMUNICATIONS 7411.6136 SNOW & LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 5620.6230 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 5420.6406 5422.6275 5422.6406 5430.5510 5410.6235 5410.6104 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES COURSE BEAUTIFICATION GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD POSTAGE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CLUB HOUSE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RICHARDS GOLF COURSE GOLF ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION 229.99 271886 5/12/2005 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 940.94 SPRING CLEAN UP 111248 9330 940.94 271887 511212005 115067 BENSON, RON PAUL 65.00 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 111160 042105 65.00 271888 511212005 104124 BEST IMPRESSIONS 13.66 SHIPPING CHARGES 111309 434601 -1 13.66 271889 5/1212005 103866 BLALOCK, KAREN 25.35 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 111161 042105 25.35 271890 5112/2005 118196 BLOOMINGTON AAS CENTER 126.00 CHARLOTTES WEB - SS 111373 050905 126.00 271891 5/1212005 103879 BLOOMINGTON RENTAL CENTER 28.27 DRAIN SNAKE 111374 16325 28.27 271892 511212005 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 199.05 BRAKE ASSEMBLY 111081 742345 228.31 MIRROR ASSEMBLY 111082 743150 132.07 VALVE ASSEMBLY 111447 728307 559.43 271893 5/1212005 100663 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 6.98 PETTY CASH 111375 050405 26.00 PETTY CASH 111375 050405 27.53 PETTY CASH 111375 050405 35.12 PETTY CASH 111375 050405 37.00 PETTY CASH 111375 050405 45.00 PETTY CASH 1111375 050405 5/11/2005 8:02:59 Page- 3 Business Unit COMMUNICATIONS 7411.6136 SNOW & LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 5620.6230 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 5420.6406 5422.6275 5422.6406 5430.5510 5410.6235 5410.6104 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES COURSE BEAUTIFICATION GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD POSTAGE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CLUB HOUSE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RICHARDS GOLF COURSE GOLF ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/11/2005 8:02:59 Council Check Register Page - 4 5/5/2005 - 5/12/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 88.00 PETTY CASH 111375 050405 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 265.63 271894 5112/2005 100667 BROCK WHITE COMPANY 123.01 CAULK 111083 11338744 -00 1375.6530 REPAIR PARTS PARKING RAMP 123.01 271895 5/12/2005 103244 BURTIS, ROBERT 150.00 PERFORMANCE 5/26/05 111147 050105 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 271896 5/12/2005 102046 CAMPE, HARRIET 66.30 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 111162 043005 5101.4413 ARTWORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 66.30 271897 5112/2005 100456 CAPITOL RUBBER STAMP CO. 18.60 STAMP 111249 13164 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 18.60 271898 511212005 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 86.47 CABLE, WHITE BOX 111376 RW28240 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 86.47 271899 5/1212005 100897, CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 29.24 111197 042905 5821.6186 HEAT 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 81.34 111197 042905 5841.6186 HEAT YORK OCCUPANCY 137,77 111197 042905 5861.6186 HEAT VERNON OCCUPANCY 141.03 111197 042905 5430.6186 HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 227,88 111197 042905 5911.6186 HEAT PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER 269.65 111197 042905 1481.6186 HEAT YORK FIRE STATION 273.32 111197 042905 5422.6186 HEAT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 573.76 111197 042905 1470.6186 HEAT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 726.80 111197 042905 5111.6186 HEAT ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 737.81 111197 042905 5420.6186 HEAT CLUB HOUSE 792.02 111197 042905 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 815.66 111197 042905 5630.6186 HEAT CENTENNIAL LAKES 1,221,16 111197 042905 1628.6186 HEAT SENIOR CITIZENS 2,552.40 111197 042905 5913.6186 HEAT DISTRIBUTION 2,593.81 111197 042905 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 9,521.46 111197 042905 5511.6186 HEAT ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 10,208.86 111197 042905 5210.6186 HEAT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 30 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/5/2005 --5/12/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 271900 5112/2005 117159 CHARLES MICHAEL COMPANY LLC 1,380.25 1/2 DOWN PMT FOR PAINTING 111250 PO 4196 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,662.50 112 DOWN PMT FOR PAINTING 111251 PO 4195 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,042.75 271901 511212005 116353 CHIPPEWA GRAPHICS INC. 195.63 ENVELOPES 111252 7576 5510.6575 PRINTING 195.63 271902 511212005 105693 CITYSPRINT 10.10 COURIER 111178 10935 -1916 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 11.24 COURIER 111178 10935 -1916 1180.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 21.34 271903 5112/2005 100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP. 286.00 VALVE, ROD 111084 45163 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 286.00 271904 5112/2005 101345 COLOURS 562.00 CITY COUNCIL BROCHURE 111253 9343 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 135.26 UTILITY BILL STUFFER DESIGN 111254 9341 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 697.26 271905 5/12/2005 118173 CONCUT INC. 321.00 CONCRETE SAW BLADES 111085 INV1005018 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 321.00 271906 511212005 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 30.95 BELT, SWITCH 111255 INV000012857 5111.6530 REPAIR PARTS 30.95 271907 511212005 100698 COPY EQUIPMENT 36.74 FIBERGLASS TAPE 111377 58186 1260.6577 LUMBER 36.74 271908 5/1212005 100513 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES IN 2,742.38 CUSTODIAL SERVICE 111086 0000095895 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,742.38 271909 5/1212005 100700 CURTIS 1000 1,039.60 NO SOLICITOR PLATES 111378 69590901 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5/1112005 8:02:59 Page- 5 Business Unit YORK OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY ARENA ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING GENERAL ELECTION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS GENERAL MAINTENANCE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT ENGINEERING GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 209.05 MERCHANDISE CITY OF EDINA 837720 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP Council Check Register 209.05 5/5/2005 - 5/12/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 271912 5/12/2005 1,039.60 103985 DAVE'S GREAT AD SHOP 271910 5/1212005 103176 DANICIC, JOHN 42.90 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 111163 042205 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 1915 42.90 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 271911 511212005 125.00 102121 DATREK PROFESSIONAL BAGS INC 5/11/2005 8:02:59 Page- 6 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES 209.05 MERCHANDISE 111379 837720 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 209.05 271912 5/12/2005 103985 DAVE'S GREAT AD SHOP 125.00 AD DESIGN 111259 1915 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 125.00 271913 5/1212005 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING 320.00 111016 310408 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 58.20 111017 310873 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,793.90 111018 310872 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 96.00 111199 311292 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 491.80 111200 311773 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 19.80 111201 311774 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 33.20 111202 311776 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,560.32 111203 311775 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 6,373.22 271914 5/12/2005 118180 DAY, DAVID 89.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 111155 050205 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 89.00 271915 5/12/2005 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 177.41 TOOLS 111087 754939 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 177.41 271916 511212005 118189 OEM -CON LANDFILL LLC 144.00 DUMPSTER CHARGE 111310 02 -027550 1644.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL TREES & MAINTENANCE 144.00 271917 5/12/2005 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 86.55 BAKERY 111256 189188 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 44.34 BAKERY 111257 189189 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 21.41 BAKERY 111258 189363 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL BAKERY 111380 189457 542 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 5/1212005 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 195.12 CLUBHOUSE HANDOUTS 111088 30862 5/5 /2005 -5/12/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 9.01 BAKERY 111381 189644 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 182.70 271918 5/12/2005 102712 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION 111089 200051272 5610.6122 37.00 WAN CHARGES FEB 05 111179 DV05020281 1400.6204 TELETYPE SERVICE 37.00 WAN CHARGES MARCH 05 111180 DV05030281 1400.6204 TELETYPE SERVICE 381.88 111260 111382 W05030569 5420.6188 TELEPHONE 271919 5/1212005 111120 DESIGN N PRINT 195.12 CLUBHOUSE HANDOUTS 111088 30862 5610.6575 195.12 271920 5/1212005 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST 29.18 CUST# 152101729 111089 200051272 5610.6122 298.40 CUST # 152104119 111260 200051268 5822.6122 298.40 CUST # 152104119 111260 200051268 5842.6122 298.41 CUST # 152104119 111260 200051268 5862.6122 924.39 271921 5/12/2005 108648 DOAN, SIIRI 29.25 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 111164 042205 5101.4413 29.25 271922 5/12/2005 116424 DOWNTOWN IDEA EXCHANGE 198.50 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 111383 1169057 -2005 1120.6105 198.50 271923 5/12/2005 118181 DUOUETTE, JAN 187.20 CLASS REFUND 111154 041305 5101.4607 187.20 271924 511212005 100739 EAGLE WINE 1,021.70 111019 224344 5842.5513 684.58 111020 224343 5822.5513 745.73 111021 214806 5862.5513 776.61 111022 224342 5862.5513 176.75 111204 228578 5862.5513 336.76 111332 228395 5842.5513 1,066.90 111333 228396 5822.5513 1,190.25 111334 227441 5842.5513 5,999.28 PRINTING ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER ART WORK SOLD DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CLASS REGISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5/11/2005 8:02:59 Page- 7 Business Unit GRILL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CLUB HOUSE ED ADMINISTRATION ED ADMINISTRATION 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING ART CENTER REVENUES ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA 5/11/2005 8:02:59 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 8 5/5/2005 - 5/12/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 271925 511212005 100741 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 7,020.20 111023 325836 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 328.00 111261 13282 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 455.00 111262 13324 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 2,602.35 111335 325915 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,988.40 111336 325835 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 225.40 111451 325901 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,403.85 111452 325902 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 14,023.20 271926 511212005 118172 EDINA PLUMBING COMPANY 137.50 REPAIRS 111090 042805 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 137.50 271927 5/12/2005 104331 EILERS, JOYCE 40.63 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 111165 042205 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 40.63 271928 5/1212005 105294 EKLUND MULCH SALES 334.14 WOOD MULCH 111385 1033 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 483.25 WOOD MULCH 111385 1033 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 817.39 271929 5112/2005 117483 ENGELE, LEE 100.00 PERFORMANCE 5124/05 111148 050105 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 100.00 271930 511212005 105339 ENRGI 698.75 WEBSITE CONSULTING 111384 2738 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 698.75 271931 5112/2005 104832 EVENT SOUND & LIGHTING 245.00 SOUND SYSTEM REPAIR 111311 632 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 245.00 271932 5112/2005 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 64.00 111024 299729 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 64.00 111453 301555 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 128.00 271933 5112/2005 102387 FBINAA CITY OF EDINA 5/11/2005 8:02:59 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 9 5/5/2005 - 5/12/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 150.00 CIVIL DEFENCE CONFERENCE 111386 050605 1460.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CIVILIAN DEFENSE 150.00 271934 511212005 100756 FEDERAL EXPRESS 28.75 SHIPPING 111091 5-496 -99441 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 28.75 271935 511212005 101432 FERRELLGAS 12.78 FUEL 111263 900240 5521.6581 GASOLINE ARENA ICE MAINT 12.78 271936 5/12/2005 118177 FOX TAX LLL 22.72 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 111175 042205 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 22.72 271937 511212005 101931 GEAR FOR SPORTS 412.83 MERCHANDISE 111387 10918935 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 412.83 271938 511212005 103316 GOETSCH, SAM L. 330.00 INTERPRETER 111388 042505 4078.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INCLUSION PROGRAM 330.00 271939 511212005 102246 GOODALL MFG. CO. 26.71 STARTER BUTTON, SWITCH 111092 149535 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 26.71 271940 511212005 102645 GRAFFITI CONTROL SERVICES 88.00 GRAFFITI REMOVAL 111312 00001238 1646.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 88.00 271941 5112/2005 100781 GRAFIX SHOPPE 1,840.00 NEW SQUAD GRAPHICS 111389 41031 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,840.00 271942 5112/2005 101103 GRAINGER 97.13 SWIVEL CASTERS 111093 498 - 550453 -1 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 23.75 CABLE TIE, BATTERIES 111264 495- 873702 -7 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 49.61 CABLE TIE, BATTERIES 111264 495- 873702 -7 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 95.76 SPOTLIGHTS 111390 495 - 731243 -4 1260.6577 LUMBER ENGINEERING GENERAL 266.25 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 271943 5112/2005 271944 511212005 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # 102670 GRAND PERE WINES INC 1,402.36 1,371.75 583.75 1,955.50 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 515/2005 - 5/12/2005 Doc No Inv No Account No 111025 00015689 5862.5513 111026 72323 111337 72508 271945 5/12/2005 101350 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO. 1,341.62 SPRINKLER REPAIR 111391 050447 759.06 SPRINKLER REPAIR 111392 050449 2,100.68 5862.5513 5862.5513 01202.1705.30 01202.1705.30 271946 5112/2005 118195 GREEN HORIZONS 877.06 SPRINKLER REPAIR 111393 72764 01202.1705.30 877.06 5/11/2005 8:02:59 Page - 10 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS HALIFAX - GRIMES STREET RECON HALIFAX - GRIMES STREET RECON HALIFAX - GRIMES STREET RECON 271948 5/1212005 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 360.85 111027 222980 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 321.22 111028 226405 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 142.69 111029 224558 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING .85 111030 224464 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 32.89- 111031 665373 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 28.00- 111032 665048 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 18.24- 111033 664219 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 578.10 111205 227249 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,70 111206 228386 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5.10 111207 228367 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING ,85 111208 228387 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 7,758.08 111209 228587 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 113.30 111210 228586 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,942.44 111211 228588 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,444.66 111212 224494 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 26.00 111213 228582 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,416.28 111214 228583 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,202.40 111338 226690 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 210.60 111339 226662 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,493,14 111340 228580 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 18.35- 111341 665174 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING ^5 111454 224466 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 111455 230325 584 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/5/2005 -- 5/12/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description ART WORK SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES 5/11/2005 8:02:59 Page - 11 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES 50TH STREET GENERAL YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS RESERVE PROGRAM GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD METERS TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR REPAIR PARTS METER REPAIR DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 20,928.43 271949 511212005 102869 GUEST, LISA 35.10 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 111166 042205 5101.4413 35.10 271950 5/12/2005 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS 114.91 REGISTER TAPE 111094 241229 5820.6406 114.91 REGISTER TAPE 111265 241299 5842.6512 229.82 271951 5/1212005 106223 HELGESON, GLEN 150.00 PERFORMANCE 5117/05 111150 050105 5610.6136 150.00 271952 5/12/2005 101215 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFI 60.00 TRAINING 111394 0000010 1419.6104 60.00 271953 5/1212005 116640 HERITAGE CROSS APPAREL 1,505.22 STAFF SHIRTS 111395 19542 5422.6406 1,505.22 271954 5/12/2005 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 266.00 111342 357850 5822.5514 266.00 271955 5/12/2005 100811 HYDRO METERING TECHNOLOGY 2,208.00 WATER METERS 111313 0029552 -IN 5914.5516 4,316.03 WATER METERS 111313 0029552 -IN 5917.6530 6,524.03 271956 5/12/2005 100812 IAAO 525.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 111396 050605 1190.6105 525.00 271957 5/12/2005 100812 IAAO 475.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 111397 050905 1190.6104 475.00 271958 511212005 101486 ICMA 913.60 DUES 111398 192438 -2005 1120.6105 ART WORK SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES 5/11/2005 8:02:59 Page - 11 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES 50TH STREET GENERAL YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS RESERVE PROGRAM GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD METERS TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR REPAIR PARTS METER REPAIR DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5111/2005 8:02:59 Council Check Register Page - 12 5/5/2005 - 5/1212005 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 913.60 271959 511212005 101714 IDENTISYS INC. 2.242.94 DATA CARD SYSTEM 111314 92160 5410.6575 PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION 9,246.19 DATA CARD SYSTEM 111314 92160 5400.1730 OFFICE FURN & EQUIPMENT GOLF BALANCE SHEET 11,489.13 271960 5/1212005 116191 INSTY- PRINTS 297.65 OPEN HOUSE FLYERS 111266 69581 2210.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 522.81 NEWSLETTER 111399 69616 2210.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 820.46 271961 5112/2005 103134 INTERLIGHT 58.89 LIGHTING 111095 6748770 5125.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 58.89 271962 511212005 103193 INTOXIMETERS INC. 2,496.36 INTOXOLIZERS 111400 167170 4601.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE FORFEITURE 2,496.36 271963 5/12/2005 101761 IVERSON, KATHRYN 350.49 PROGRAM CONSULTANT 111267 050405 4201.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CHEMICAL AWARENESS 1,666.66 PROGRAM CONSULTANT 111267 050405 5840.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 1,666.66 PROGRAM CONSULTANT 111267 050405 5860.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 1,666.68 PROGRAM CONSULTANT 111267 050405 5820.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET GENERAL 5,350.49 271964 5/12/2005 100386 J.R. JOHNSON SUPPLY INC. 115.60 GREENHOUSE REPAIRS 111446 85628 1643.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL TURF CARE 115.60 271965 511212005 104198 JACK MCCLARD & ASSOCIATES INC. 69.22 TIRE CHANGE AIR GAUGE 111096 37877 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 69.22 271966 5/1212005 100828 JERRY'S FOODS 77.27 111268 2034 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 56.84 111315 2076 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 63.07 111315 2076 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 100.23 111315 2076 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 335.05 111315 2076 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 111315 2076 140' MEETING EXPENSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 134.71 ART CENTER 1,393.69 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/5/2005 - 5/12/2005 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 111316 4/17105 5110.6564 271967 5/12/2005 100830 JERRY'S PRINTING 170.40 DOOR HANGER NOTICES 111401 32743 170.40 271968 5112/2005 102146 JESSEN PRESS 207.68 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE 111097 51067 886.44 LETTERHEAD 111098 51066 269.98 P&R LETTERHEAD 111099 51065 1,364.10 271969 5/12/2005 100832 JIM HATCH SALES 205.57 SHOVELS, TAMPERS 111269 6918 411.12 SHOVELS, TAMPERS 111269 6918 616.69 271971 5/12/2005 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 99.95 111034 1890477 .87 111035 1890484 1,308.81 111036 1890480 1.596.57 111037 1890479 2,601.14 111038 1890485 40.20 111039 1890489 1,100.17 111040 1890491 585.60 111041 1890486 90.60 111042 1891332 25.75- 111043 279396 69.45- 111044 279394 1.90 111215 1890471 16,660.71 111216 1890482 3,565.13 111217 1890483 2,402.43 111218 1890488 3,975.00 111219 1892083 770.00 111220 1892084 4.11 111343 1893880 172.53 111344 1892080 463.14 111345 1893878 580.25 111346 1890487 1,429.87 111347 1890492 1,543.97 111348 1893873 1260.6406 1550.6406 1550.6406 1550.6406 5913.6556 1301.6556 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5822.5515 5842.5513 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5512 5862.5512 5862.5512 5862.5512 5862.5515 5842.5512 5862.5512 5862.5512 5862.5512 5862.5512 Subledger Account Description CRAFT SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS TOOLS COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 5/11/2005 8:02:59 Page- 13 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL DISTRIBUTION GENERAL MAINTENANCE YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/11/2005 8:02:59 Council Check Register Page - 14 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART WORK SOLD UNIFORM ALLOWANCE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT ART CENTER REVENUES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5/5/2005 - 5/12/2005 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 915.80 111349 1893875 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,901.81 111350 1893876 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 563.07 111456 1893866 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 822.89 111457 1893864 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 206.90 111458 1893862 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 61.00 111459 1893863 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,791.82 111460 1893869 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,393.73 111461 1893870 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 856.97 111462 1893865 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 851.70 111463 1893868 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,137.54 111464 1893871 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4.44 111465 1893872 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 770.00 111466 1892082 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,909.00 111467 1892081 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD ART WORK SOLD UNIFORM ALLOWANCE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT ART CENTER REVENUES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 54,084.42 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 271972 5/12/2005 50TH ST SELLING 102603 JONAS, LENORE 81.74 CANDY 111402 050405 5111.5510 81.74 271973 511212005 116887 KC FINE ART LLC 34.91 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 111167 042205 5101.4413 34.91 271974 5/12/2005 111018 KEEPRS INC. 105.00 UNIFORM 111403 36231 -01 1400.6203 105.00 271975 5/12/2005 100846 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO 32.00 111045 434358 5842.5515 1,724.00 111046 434359 5842.5514 104.00 111221 434355 5822.5515 2,751.20 111222 434423 5842.5514 268.80 111351 434354 5822.5514 4,880.00 271976 511212005 100605 LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS 35.25 111404 03983726 1550.6121 35.25- 111405 03795019 1550.6121 69.45 UNIFORM 111406 04005112 1400.6203 - 45 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART WORK SOLD UNIFORM ALLOWANCE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT ART CENTER REVENUES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 111047 110.00 CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 928.30 111048 271982 Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 105680 MAAS, STACY 67.60 111049 788822 5/5/2005 - 5/12/2005 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 271977 5112/2005 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. PETTY CASH 111408 050505 5630.6406 285.93 NUTS, WASHERS, PINS 111100 3166233 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 285.93 271983 271978 5/1212005 100864 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. 100855 LESCO INC. 33.15 MARKING PAINT 111101 9RG127 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1050260 1314.6180 33.15 12,780.00 271979 511212005 116760 LITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL ALLSTA 271984 5112/2005 99.00 AD 111407 040705 5210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 99.00 89.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 111156 271980 5112/2005 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 89.00 5/11/2005 8:02:59 Page - 15 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GOLF DOME PROGRAM 1 041 42 111468 179203 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,041.42 271981 5/1212005 101165 M.A.A.O. '11000 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 111317 050505 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING ED ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL LAKES STREET RENOVATION EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION ADMINISTRATION 1,965.90 111047 110.00 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 928.30 111048 271982 5/1212005 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 105680 MAAS, STACY 67.60 111049 788822 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 75.00 PETTY CASH 111408 050505 5610.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 95.11 PETTY CASH 111408 050505 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 170.11 271983 5/12/2005 100864 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. 12,780.00 SPRAY POTHOLE PATCHER 111409 1050260 1314.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 12,780.00 271984 5112/2005 102863 MADER, STEVE 89.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 111156 050205 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 89.00 271985 5/1212005 100866 MAMA 18.00 LUNCHEON MEETING 111410 1181 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE 18.00 271986 5112/2005 100868 MARK VII SALES ED ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL LAKES STREET RENOVATION EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION ADMINISTRATION 1,965.90 111047 788820 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 928.30 111048 789601 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 67.60 111049 788822 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 43.00 111050 788821 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5111/2005 8:02:59 Council Check Register Page - 16 5/5/2005 - 5/12/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,151.35 111051 791516 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5,090.50 111223 791758 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 21.95 111224 791759 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 158.90 111270 790634 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 3,009.90 111352 791463 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 4,966.08 111469 794144 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 18,403.48 271987 511212005 103280 MARLIN COMPANY, THE 586.57 COMMUNICATIONS PROGRAM 111102 321469 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 586.57 271988 5/12/2005 100869 MARTIN- MCALLISTER 700.00 PERSONNEL EVALUATIONS 111411 4249 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 700.00 271989 5/1212005 102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC 282.46 PHONE CHANGES 111412 24498 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 282.46 271990 511212005 101790 MCMAHON, DANIEL 300.39 EFFECTIVE ROADWAY LIGHTING 111103 050205 1280.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 300.39 271991 5/12/2005 101483 MENARDS 225.39 SHOVELS, FAN, PAINT 111104 17983 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 25.90 DOWNRODS 111413 20364 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 251.29 271992 511212005 102281 MENARDS 4.25 STAIR TREADS 111105 73734 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 4.25 271993 5/12/2005 100882 MERIT SUPPLY 1,838.19 TRASH CONTAINERS 111271 66755 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 1,296.32 CLEANERS 111272 66832 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 257.57 CLEANERS, SPONGES, TOWELS 111318 66812 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 110.12 SOAP DISPENSERS 111319 66813 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 3,502.20 271994 5112/2005 100041 METRO CISM TEAM CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 111414 050505 140' CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 43.88 CITY OF EDINA 111168 042205 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES Council Check Register 43.88 5/512005 - 5112/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 60.00 271995 5/12/2005 111052 115212 METROIMINNESOTA CHAPTER 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 125.00 SEMINAR FEE 111415 050605 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING 82521084 5862.5515 125.00 VERNON SELLING 271996 5/1212005 111225 100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,435.50 APRIL 2005 111416 050405 1495.4307 SAC CHARGES INSPECTIONS 1,435.50 271999 5112/2005 271997 5112/2005 102508 METZGER, MAURE ANN 5/11/2005 8:02:59 Page - 17 43.88 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 111168 042205 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 43.88 271998 5/1212005 100692 MIDWEST COCA -COLA EAGAN 410.10 111052 83644135 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 325.10 111053 82521084 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 107.10 111225 82521167 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 842.30 271999 5112/2005 101260 MIDWEST LIGHTING PRODUCTS 791.19 LIGHTING 111106 00041038 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 791.19 272000 5/1212005 118193 MILLER, SUZANNE 15.00 GIFT CERT BAL REFUND 111443 050605 5201.4543 GOLF DOME RECEIPTS GOLF DOME REVENUES 15.00 272001 5/12/2005 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 16.29 CYLINDERS 111417 R104050147 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 5.07 PROPANE 111418 R102050326 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 21.36 272002 511212005 100913 MINNEAPOLIS SUBURBAN SEWER &W 1,190.00 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 111107 32664 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1,360.00 REPAIR SERVICE LINE 111108 32662 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 2,550.00 272003 5/1212005 101591 MINNESOTA CERAMIC SUPPLY 86.06 CERAMIC SUPPLIES 111274 12522 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 86.06 R55CKREG LOG20000 2,249.75 4TH QTR 04 CITY OF EDINA 7976541 -000 1550.6046 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL Council Check Register 5/5/2005 — 5/12/2005 5/12/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 272004 5/12/2005 29.25 101284 MINNESOTA CROWN DIST CO 111158 042105 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 142.00 111470 10792 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 142.00 272009 5/12/2005 272005 5/12/2005 101410 MINNESOTA STATE BOARD OF ELECT 50.00 INSPECTION CERT BOOKS 111181 050405 1495.4113 ELECTRICAL PERMITS ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 50.00 31.56 272006 5/1212005 100899 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER 272010 511212005 101696 MSP COMMUNICATIONS 4,521.47 APRIL 2005 111182 050305 1495.4380 SURCHARGE 500.00 4,521.47 111273 LISTING 5420.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 272007 5/12/2005 101144 MINNESOTA UC FUND 5/11/2005 8:02:59 Page - 18 Business Unit YUKK JtLLINU INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS 2,249.75 4TH QTR 04 111109 7976541 -000 1550.6046 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 2,249.75 272008 5/12/2005 118179 MONROE, MARK 29.25 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 111158 042105 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 29.25 272009 5/12/2005 106190 MOORE, MARY CARROLL 31.56 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 111169 042205 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 31.56 272010 511212005 101696 MSP COMMUNICATIONS 500.00 WEDDING GUIDE AD 111273 LISTING 5420.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CLUB HOUSE 500.00 272011 5/12/2005 117246 MT GLOBAL 1,703.72 111111 714 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,703.72 272012 5112/2005 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 356.71 FERTILIZER 111110 453817 -00 5630.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES 356.71 272013 5112/2005 105066 NATURAL REFLECTIONS VII LLC 402.05 PUMP REPAIRS 111320 573 4086.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS 402.05 272014 511212005 103007 NELSON, DAVID F UNIFORM PURCHASE 111419 050605 140(' UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/11/2005 8:02:59 Council Check Register Page - 19 5/5/2005 - 5/12/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 608.66 272015 511212005 116468 NETIQ CORPORATION 638.19 SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE 111183 50053447 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 638.19 272016 5112/2005 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 130.00 111226 31129 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 130.00 272017 511212005 104672 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 168.13 111184 679000121 -029 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 113.53 111275 737969523 -011 1495.6188 TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS 395.01 111420 909583317 -041 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,046.78 111444 757391129 -029 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,723.45 272018 5/12/2005 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY 49.14 ART SUPPLIES 111276 31370700 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 49.14 272019 511212005 100930 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO. 732.29 TIRES 111112 NW -95432 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 732.29 272020 511212005 116480 NSITE MYSTERY SHOPPING 163.96 MYSTERY SHOPPING 111277 1153 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 165.00 MYSTERY SHOPPING 111277 1153 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 165.00 MYSTERY SHOPPING 111277 1153 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 493.96 272021 5/1212005 101592 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN 18.09 PLANNER 111321 2373J108 5610.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ED ADMINISTRATION 18.09 272022 5/1212005 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 111.83 CHAIN 111113 334601 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 111.83 272023 5112/2005 113439 ONYX ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 223.34 RECYCLE LAMPS 111114 EW275383 1280.6271 HAZ. WASTE DISPOSAL SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 223.34 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/5/2005 -5/12/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 272024 5/12/2005 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC. 5,956.00 AIR UNIT REPAIRS 111421 84363 5210.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5,956.00 272025 5/1212005 118188 OXFORD GOLF 5/11/2005 8:02:59 Page - 20 Business Unit GOLF DOME PROGRAM 725.70 MERCHANDISE 111278 368682 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES RANGE VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING GOLF ADMINISTRATION CENT SERV GEN - MIS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SERV GEN - MIS ENGINEERING GENERAL YORK SELLING CENTENNIAL LAKES GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 725.70 272026 511212005 118187 PARETO- HOLLROCK/SGD GOLF 567.10 BALL CLEANER 111279 202591 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 567.10 272027 511212005 100347 PAUSTIS 8, SONS 2,854.90 111353 8068663 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 205.00 111354 8068666 -IN 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 354.66- 111355 8068162 -CM 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,094.20 111471 8068660 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 2,392.80 111472 8068665 -IN 5842.5513. COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 48.99- 111473 8068166 -CM 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 6,143.25 272028 5/1212005 110832 PC2 SOLUTIONS, INC. 160.00 TECHNICAL SERVICES 111185 42305005 5410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 520.00 TECHNICAL SERVICES 111185 42305005 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 600.00 TECHNICAL SERVICES 111185 42305005 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING 640.00 TECHNICAL SERVICES 111185 42305005 5430.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 140.00 TECHNICAL SERVICES 111186 32605004 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING 315.00 TECHNICAL SERVICES 111186 32605004 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 700.00 TECHNICAL SERVICES 111186 32605004 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,075.00 272029 5/1212005 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 76.80 111054 79754718 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 260.70 111115 43926845 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 337.50 272030 511212005 100946 PERA 79,364.32 PPEND 5/3/05 111442 050905 1000.2023 P.E.R.A. PAYABLE 79,364.32 272031 511212005 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS RANGE VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING GOLF ADMINISTRATION CENT SERV GEN - MIS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SERV GEN - MIS ENGINEERING GENERAL YORK SELLING CENTENNIAL LAKES GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 272032 5/12/2005 CITY OF EDINA 118182 PINCKAERS, JAMES 5/11/2005 8:02:59 Council Check Register 30.00 Page - 21 111153 042105 5/5/2005 -5112/2005 30.00 Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,287.70 111055 2191378 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 356.27 111056 2191387 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 88.95 111057 2191388 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,335.85 111058 2191386 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,417.33 111059 2191385 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 29.00- 111060 3316891 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 26.01- 111061 3316890 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,226.54 111227 2192440 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,480.75 111228 2192438 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 8,322.23 111356 2192439 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 185.25 111357 2191384 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 57.95 111358 2193785 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 69.90 111474 2193778 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 369.80 111475 2193781 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 26.94 111476 2193784 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,588.55 111477 2193783 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.092.70 111478 2193782 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 272032 5/12/2005 118182 PINCKAERS, JAMES 30.00 CLASS REFUND 111153 042105 30.00 272033 5112/2005 101110 POLLY NORMAN PHOTOGRAPHY 25.00 MAETZOLD PHOTO 111280 050305 25.00 272034 5/1212005 100819 POPP TELECOM 276.89 PHONE CHANGES 111422 75670 276.89 272035 5/1212005 100961 POSTMASTER 350.00 NEWSLETTER POSTAGE 111322 050505 350.00 272036 5/12/2005 101032 PRINT SHOP, THE 585.16 NEWSLETTER 111323 IP101237 585.16 272037 5/1212005 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 2,228.13 111062 224560 2,421.11 111063 224556 5101.4607 1100.6406 5410.6230 1628.6235 1628.6575 5842.5513 5862.5513 CLASS REGISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER REVENUES CITY COUNCIL SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION POSTAGE SENIOR CITIZENS PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/11/2005 8:02:59 Council Check Register Page - 22 Check # Date 272038 5/1212005 272039 5/1212005 Amount Supplier / Explanation 163.59 5,895.70 1,128.20 1,738.50 78.10 958.48 364.70 4,522.04 19,498.55 5/5/2005 - 5/12/2005 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 111064 224915 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 111065 224463 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 111066 224465 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 111229 228579 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 111359 228585 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 111360 228584 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 111361 228581 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 111479 224467 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 102964 QUALIFICATION TARGETS 196.41 TRAINING TARGETS 111423 20500941 1400.6104 196.41 100971 QUALITY WINE 17.78- 111067 544805 -00 5840.5518 1,803.94 111067 544805.00 5842.5513 10.30- 111068 544573 -00 5860.5518 1,042.13 111068 544573 -00 5862.5513 8.31- 111069 544806 -00 5860.5518 843.33 111069 544806 -00 5862.5513 7.33- 111070 544431 -00 5862.5513 1.53- 111071 535322 -00 5842.5512 4.34- 111116 544572 -00 5840.5518 436.71 111116 544572 -00 5842.5513 5.90- 111230 546133 -00 5840.5518 598.16 111230 546133 -00 5842.5513 5.86- 111231 547587 -00 5840.5518 597,12 111231 647587 -00 5842.5513 2,28- 111232 547848 -00 5840.5518 231.15 111232 547848 -00 5842.5513 90.61- 111233 547764 -00 5840.5518 4,563.16 111233 547764 -00 5842.5512 5,12- 111234 547461 -00 5820.5518 517.52 111234 547461 -00 5822.5513 4.15- 111235 546927 -00 5820.5518 426.00 111235 546927 -00 5822.5513 3.46- 111236 547849 -00 5860.5518 349.57 111236 547849 -00 5862.5513 8.06- 111237 547453 -00 5860.5518 p' - 111237 547453 -00 5862 1111238 544645 -00 58E CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL LIQUOR YORK GENERAL YORK SELLING VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL VERNON SELLING VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL YORK SELLING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL YORK SELLING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL YORK SELLING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL YORK SELLING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL YORK SELLING 50TH STREET GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING 50TH STREET GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL VERNON SELLING VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/11/2005 8:02:59 Council Check Register Page - 23 515/2005 -5/12/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 21.76- 111362 547615 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 1,093.15 111362 547615 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING .87- 111363 539043 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 43.56 111363 539043 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 44.98- 111364 547771 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 2,266.72 111364 547771 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 294.16- 111365 543659 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 15,019.70 272040 511212005 101965 QWEST 96.32 952 927 -8861 111117 8861 -4/05 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 54.60 952 929 -0297 111118 0297 -4/05 4090.6188 TELEPHONE STREET REVOLVING 86.53 952 929 -9549 111119 9549 -4/05 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 1,419.59 111324 042805 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,657.04 272041 511212005 112562 RADIO SHACK CORPORATION 64.93 CABLE, ADAPTER 111282 201237 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 42.59 MICROPHONE 111283 201238 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 107.52 272042 5/12/2005 105631 RICHFIELD BUS COMPANY 291.75 LION KING TRIP 111325 132823 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 291.75 272043 5/12/2005 102095 RICKERT, DAVID 30.55 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 111170 042205 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 30.55 272044 5/12/2005 114489 RICOH CORPORATION 41.38 COPIER MAINTENANCE 111281 F042900031 -21 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 41.38 272045 5/12/2005 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 124.59 101- 26373069350 111120 050205 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 124.59 272046 511212005 118194 SANDERS, BOB 40.00 GIFT CERT REFUND 111424 050605 5201.4543 GOLF DOME RECEIPTS GOLF DOME REVENUES 40.00 272047 5/12/2005 118183 SAPIRO, GUILLERMO R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/11/2005 8:02:59 Council Check Register Page - 24 5/5/2005 - 5/1212005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 28.00 CLASS REFUND 111152 042005 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 28.00 272048 511212005. 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 482.40 DOOR 111121 40077218 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 267.49 BOARD 111284 40077217 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 749.89 272049 5/12/2005 108694 SCHWALM, ELISABETH 35.75 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 111159 042105 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 35.75 272050 5/12/2005 112875 SECOND FOUNDATION SCHOOL 239.30 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 111171 042205 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 239.30 272051 5/1212005 102949 SECURITAS SECURITY SYSTEMS USA 407.90 ALARM SERVICE 111122 2062695 -IN 5630.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES 407.90 272052 511212005 118186 SERVICEMASTER 119.81 CLEAN GLYCOL SPILL 111285 00035241 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 119.81 272053 511212005 100998 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 49.79 PAINT 111123 8796 -8 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 49.79 272054 5/12/2005 118069 SIJAY DESIGNS 40.30 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 111176 042105 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 40.30 272055 511212005 101002 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS INC 8,074.90 111239 164688 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 13.85 111240 164689 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 315.55 111241 164685 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 65.50 111286 350430 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 8.469.80 272056 5/12/2005 110977 SOW, ADAMA 119.60 ARTWORK SOLD AT EAC 111172 042205 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/5/2005 - 5/12/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 272057 511212005 116682 SPECIALTY WINE & BEVERAGES 162.00 111072 2518 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLINC 272058 511212005 101021 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC 454.58 1419.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 57.30 041 9133 038 111124 FUEL 1553.6581 120.30 041 9133 038 111124 FUEL 1314.6406 177.60 111287 043005 272059 511212005 101004 SPS COMPANIES 272061 358.21 COPPER TUBING, CUTTERS 111125 S1224778.001 5911.6406 92.38 CLOSET REPAIR KITS 111126 S1222844.002 1551.6530 3.99 GASKETS 111425 S1224678.001 5620.6406 1550.6121 5915.6406 5915.6406 GASOLINE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES ADVERTISING PERSONNEL GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 5/11/2005 8:02:59 Page - 25 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN STREET RENOVATION PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER CITY HALL GENERAL EDINBOROUGH PARK CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL WATER TREATMENT WATER TREATMENT 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 454.58 1419.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS RESERVE PROGRAM 272060 5/12/2005 POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 101007 STAR TRIBUNE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 3,333.45 WANT ADS 111287 043005 3,333.45 272061 511212005 102390 STRAND MANUFACTURING CO INC 51.33 WELD TWO ANGLES 111127 25425 1,614.54 POSTS, GATES, HINGES 111128 25424 1,665.87 272062 511212005 101015 STREICHERS 1,860.70 SQUAD BUILD -UP 111426 1264981 330.15 AMMO 111427 1263858 860.25 AMMO 111428 1263854 316.31 SLINGS 111429 1264070 178.94 ERT UNIFORM 111430 1264262 218.17 MARKING CHALK, FUSES 111431 1263450 3,764.52 272063 5/12/2005 102639 STROHMYER, TOM 150.00 PERFORMANCE 5/19105 111149 050105 150.00 272064 5/1212005 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 1550.6121 5915.6406 5915.6406 GASOLINE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES ADVERTISING PERSONNEL GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 5/11/2005 8:02:59 Page - 25 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN STREET RENOVATION PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER CITY HALL GENERAL EDINBOROUGH PARK CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL WATER TREATMENT WATER TREATMENT 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1419.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS RESERVE PROGRAM 1400.6551 AMMUNITION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 20.37 PIN ASSEMBLY 111129 388695CVW 1553.6530 20.37 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 515/2005 — 5/1212005 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 272065 5/12/2005 108509 TAFFEE, MARY 57.85 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 111173 042205 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 5620.6406 1550.6230 1343.6406 1195.6103 1195.6103 1195.6103 5862.5514 5862.5515 5862.5514 5421.5514 5421.5514 5424.6103 5511.6406 5440.5511 5440.5511 59' GENERAL SUPPLIES 5/11/2005 8:02:59 Page - 26 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES EDINBOROUGH PARK SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BRIDGES GUARD RAILS LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 57.85 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 272066 511212005 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 101027 TARGET COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 500.60 ACCT 9- 146 - 862 - 686 -90 111288 042605 500.60 272067 511212005 116344 TECH TEAM SOLUTIONS INC. 1,151.00 IBM SELECTRIC MAINTENANCE 111130 0000171 1,151.00 272068 511212005 118083 THOMAS TOOL AND SUPPLY INC. 490.43 HAMMER KIT, WRENCH 111131 902784 490.43 272069 5/1212005 101034 THOMSEN & NYBECK 24,164.89 PROSECUTING 111187 10220 596.00 PROSECUTING - ATK 111188 10219 1,482.40 PROSECUTING - YEAZIZW 111189 10218 26,243.29 272070 511212005 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 5,826.72 111073 370670 27.50 111074 370669 19.50- 111075 367636CR 160.25 111289 371074 460.00 111290 17386 6,454.97 272071 511212005 114701 TIME WARNER CABLE 279.85 ACCT 0415703 -01 111291 042505 50.62 ACCT 0379101 -01 111292 042705 330.47 272072 511212005 101474 TITLEIST 1,053.89 GOLF BALLS 111293 2123527 126.90 GOLF BALLS 111294 2133020 1.180.79 272073 511212005 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY OXYGEN, WELDING GAS 111132 354293 5620.6406 1550.6230 1343.6406 1195.6103 1195.6103 1195.6103 5862.5514 5862.5515 5862.5514 5421.5514 5421.5514 5424.6103 5511.6406 5440.5511 5440.5511 59' GENERAL SUPPLIES 5/11/2005 8:02:59 Page - 26 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES EDINBOROUGH PARK SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BRIDGES GUARD RAILS LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RANGE GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES WELDING SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/11/2005 8:02:59 Council Check Register Page - 27 5/5/2005 — 5/12/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 43.11 272074 511212005 118178 TOTH, JOSEPH PAUL 27.30 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 111174 042205 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 27.30 272075 5/1212005 118197 TRAVEL GRAPHICS INTERNATIONAL 195.00 AD 111432 T414A/05178 5210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 195.00 272076 511212005 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 1,314.85 BALLFIELD FERTILIZER 111326 M100043 1642.6540 FERTILIZER FIELD MAINTENANCE 1,314.85 272077 5/1212005 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 958.50 SEED 111133 11770 5424.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT RANGE 958.50 272078 511212005 101051 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 41.00 MARCH & APRIL 111433 043005 1419.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE RESERVE PROGRAM 1,730.12 MARCH & APRIL 111433 043005 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 6,346.13 MARCH & APRIL 111433 043005 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 8,117.25 272079 511212005 100050 USPS 4,000.00 POSTAGE 111434 050605 1550.6235 POSTAGE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 4,000.00 272080 511212005 103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 37,951.34 STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS 111435 9398 04305.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS STS 305 PARKLAWN RICHARDS 37,951.34 272081 5/12/2005 101338 VALLIERE, JOHN 30.00 MPGA BANQUET 111295 050505 5410.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 30.00 272082 511212005 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 26.36 ROLL TOWELS 111327 579317 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 26.36 272083 5/1212005 116869 VANCE BROTHERS INC. 46.73 WIRE WHEELS 111134 6292 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/5/2005 - 5/12/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 46.73 272084 5/12/2005 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 263.92 WIRE 111436 8971662 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 263.92 272085 5/12/2005 103466 WASTE MANAGEMENT - SAVAGE MN 859.62 30 YD ROLLOFF 111190 3092827 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 285.06 30 YD ROLLOFF 111191 3093317 5630.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 3,003.86 REFUSE 111192 3092724 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,000.33 REFUSE 111193 3098498 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7,148.87 272086 511212005 118184 WENSHAU, BEV 130.00 RENTAL REFUND 111151 050205 1600.4722.09 ROSLAND RENTAL 130.00 272087 5/1212005 105566 WERRE & BETZEN SALES INC. 5/11/2005 8:02:59 Page - 28 Business Unit POOL OPERATION GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 50TH STREET RUBBISH PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 97.20 GOLF CLUB 111296 1390 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 21000 GOLF CLUBS 111437 1392 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 307.20 272088 5/12/2005 101079 WHEELER LUMBER 80.94 LINE POSTS, ANCHORS 111135 1220 -018204 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 80.94 272089 511212005 102133 WILSON GOLF DIVISION SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 106.20 GOLF BALLS 111297 3426952 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 106.20 272090 511212005 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 550.40 111076 114357 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 566.90 111242 114827 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 518.40 111366 114863-00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,635.70 272091 5/12/2005 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 1,625.30 111077 123129 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 419.09 111480 123695 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,044.39 272092 511212005 101082 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY RSSCKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/11/2005 8:02:59 Council Check Register Page - 29 5/5/2005 - 5/12/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 100.51 MINI GOLF BALLS 111136 116692 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 104.04 TEE MARKERS 111298 116997 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 204.55 272093 511212005 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 349.00 111078 163856 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 324.00- 111079 162661 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 25.00 272094 5/1212005 101726 XCEL ENERGY 7.43 51- 6541084 -2 111137 25143620 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 26.05 51 -0892224 -5 111138 25164457 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 3,079.54 51 -0621207 -1 111139 25146953 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 425.91 51- 6046826 -0 111140 25172247 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 170.08 51 -4156445-0 111141 25270807 5932.6185 LIGHT & POWER GENERAL STORM SEWER 140.03 51- 6229265 -9 111142 25286835 1481.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK FIRE STATION 574.78 51- 6229265 -9 111142 25286835 1470.6185 LIGHT & POWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 54.02 51- 6692497 -0 111143 25150151 1460.6185 LIGHT & POWER CIVILIAN DEFENSE 26,907.59 514621797 -2 111144 25092276 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 289.30 51- 6137136 -8 111145 25132323 5430.6185 LIGHT & POWER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 1,618.14 51- 5547446 -1 111146 25115741 1628.6185 LIGHT & POWER SENIOR CITIZENS 506.41 51- 6979948 -4 111328 25809094 5861.6185 LIGHT & POWER VERNON OCCUPANCY 506.42 51- 6979948-4 111328 25809094 5841.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK OCCUPANCY 506.42 51- 6979948 -4 111328 25809094 5821.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 85.92 51- 5938955 -6 111329 25776790 4086.6185 LIGHT & POWER AQUATIC WEEDS 10.65 51- 6050184 -2 111330 25142185 4086.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS 1,020.39 51- 6840050 -6 111438 25798423 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER 1,725.17 51- 5605640 -1 111439 25768664 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 3,231.73 51 -0824328 -7 111445 26269495 5420.6185 LIGHT & POWER CLUB HOUSE 40,885.98 272095 5/1212005 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 120.24 APRIL USAGE - P & R 111194 009542993 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 428.42 APRIL USAGE - ADMIN 111195 009542990 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 25.00 APRIL USAGE - BLDG 111196 009542992 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 111.06 APRIL USAGE 111299 009543192 5110.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION - 397.89 APRIL USAGE 111440 009542991 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,082.61 272096 5/1212005 112473 YOKOYAMA, YUMI 52.00 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 111157 042105 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 52.00 CITY OF EDINA 511112005 5:02:59 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 30 5/5 /2005 — 5/12/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit .272097 5112/2005 118191 YOUNG, ARLENE 150.00 TPS STAFF 11'1331 050405 1629.6103. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 150.00 272098 511212005 116624 YOUTH BASEBALL YEARBOOK 90.00 AD 111441 041305 5210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 90.00 591,615.09 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 591,615.09 Total Payments 591,615.09 R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/11/2005 8:24:19 Council Check Summary Page - 1 5/5/2005 - 5/1212005 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 214,814.74 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 3,249.65 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 13,014.59 05100 ART CENTER FUND 2,938.81 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 16,644.46 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 263.92 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 32,529.87 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 11,076.81 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 3,721.90 05800 LIQUOR FUND 234,063.05 05900 UTILITY FUND 20,089.67 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 38,121.42 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 1,086.20 Report Totals 591,615.09 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing pglicies and procedures date � 9 , M < �6i 77r 1 Uapinc, Gap Banana Republic Old Navy May 5, 2005 Chief Michael Siitari 4801 West 50th Edina MN 55424 Chief Siitari, We at Gap Inc. would like to take this time to extend our gratitude to Detectives Brandon Deschler and Eric Kleinberg for their swift and decisive actions on March 12th of this year. Our loss prevention department presented information to Detective Deschler about an organized retail crime group that had been observed victimizing several retailers in Southdale mall. Detectives Deschler and Kleinberg used their time and resources to track this group to a local motel and subsequently serve warrants on their room and vehicle. Detectives Deschler and Kleinberg's working knowledge of organized retail crime was instrumental in the recovery of over $16,000 of goods stolen from local retailers; including over $4,000 of our GAP Inc. merchandise. Though this is only one incident of note, we feel it exemplifies the outstanding working relationship our company enjoys with your department. We are fortunate to be able to rely upon a police department whose high caliber is reflected by officers such as these. Thank yo Keith White Senior VP Loss Prevention Gap Inc. IV DATE: May 12, 2005 MEMORANDUM CITY OF EDINA TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: -Steven Lillehaug, Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes Attached are the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) meeting minutes from the March 24, 2005 and April 28, 2005 meetings. The April 28, 2005 minutes have not been approved by the ETC and are being presented in DRAFT form. w9A, MINUTES OF THE Edina Transportation Commission 0 e �� Thursday, March 24, 2005 v �y Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street ss .,, le Community Room MEMBERS PRESENT: Fred Richards, Marie Thorpe, Jean White, Warren Plante, Joni Kelly Bennett, Dean Dovolis MEMBERS ABSENT: Les Wanninger STAFF PRESENT: Steve Lillehaug, Sharon Allison L Call to Order Chair Richards called the meeting to order. It. New Business a. Handouts Draft Edina Proposed Street Reconstruction Map: In response to questions asked by the Commissioners, Lillehaug stated that the Reconstruction Map is a layout of proposed reconstruction based on condition and age of the roads and utilities. The estimated reconstruction costs includes curb and gutter, but does not include decorative streetlight. The existing road material in most cases determines the type of material used during reconstruction. The life span of concrete roads is longer than bituminous but it is significantly more expensive. There are currently no plans to add bicycle stripping to roadways. Certain design criteria are required for bicycle stripping. Lillehaug said that it would be most cost effective to add traffic calming measures during reconstruction. Dovolis said he would like to see the map coordinated with traffic calming measures and the ETC change priorities to match Engineering's reconstruction schedule. He cited the Country Club Neighborhood that is scheduled for major reconstruction and said now would be a good time to put that area through the NMTP process, as well as W. 44th St. Thorpe concurred and said 50th & France was a missed opportunity that should not happen again. Bennett said to avoid problems of the past and because what happens in one neighborhood will impact another, she would strongly recommend that they look at the entire area west of France and north of 50th (Country Club, Morningside and the White Oaks Neighborhoods), except the Sunnyslope Neighborhood. The area would need to be scored and ranked and Lillehaug said it could be done very similar to Gleason and Valley View Rd with 44th St being the governing street. He said past traffic studies could probably be used as a starting point. Plante said one member of the Council did not want them to address issues in the Country Club and Morningside Neighborhoods because of the controversy. Dovolis said this does not make good public policy and it is not cost effective to do nothing during reconstruction and then look at making changes later on. Thorpe made a motion to do the scoring and ranking of the three neighborhoods. Motion seconded by Dovolis. Ayes: 4 (Plante, Thorpe, White, Dovolis) Nayes: 2 (Richards, Bennett) Motion carried. Resolution No. 2005 -13, Interstate 494 Funding; Edina Resolution No. 2005 -16, Highway 100 Project Schedule The Council has adopted the above resolutions for 1-494 to increase funding and for Highway 100 opposing the delay. b. Revise Regular Transportation Commission Monthly Meeting Date Dovolis made a motion to change the ETC meeting dates to the third Thursday of every month. Motion seconded by Plante. Ayes: 6 Nayes: 0 Motion carried. c. Development/Redevelopment Review Process Lillehaug developed a set of guidelines for use by the ETC when reviewing land use development/redevelopment. It includes the list of development and zoning applications that would typically initiate a traffic study; a list of four questions for the ETC to consider; followed by the process of commenting, objecting and making a recommendation. Lillehaug said question No. 4 might not be feasible due to time constraints from when an application is submitted and eventually reaches the ETC for consideration, and it would not be fair to hold up a developer if there isn't a transportation plan in place prior to the application. He said this could result in legal action against the City. Bennett said there must be something that can be done even within the time constraints and the risk of legal action. Plante said the 50th and France redevelopment was known through the grapevine long before it was presented to the City. Dovolis said seeing if there is an opportunity to address an issue may not mean putting a developer on hold. He said he was asked to push a building 10 ft. back in Minneapolis so that a turn lane could be added later on and this did not delay his project. Richards said it's the government's responsibility to solve their traffic issues regardless of redevelopment and not hold the private sector hostage. Thorpe said all the issue areas are currently developed and cannot be fixed unless redevelopment is taking place. Lillehaug said to address traffic issues, some cities have placed moratoriums on certain areas, develop transportation plans, completed traffic studies and acquired right -of -ways in anticipation of redevelopment. Bennett said no one wants to hold up a developer but there must be a way to make plans in anticipation of redevelopment. Dovolis said speaking as a developer, question No. 4 is a viable opportunity to consider during the review process. Dovolis made a motion to accept the Development/Redevelopment Review Process as submitted including question No. 4. Bennett seconded the motion with the following amendment: under "Initiation of a Traffic Study" add item #v. as follows: A traffic study would be initiated in an instance in which development or redevelopment is proposed in an area in 2 which there has been a previous identification of traffic problem, including but not limited to congestion or safety issues. Ayes: 5 (Plante, Bennett, Thorpe, White, Dovolis) Nayes: 1 (Richards) Motion carried. d. Community Center & South View Gymnasium Traffic Study — Howard R. Green Company Steve Manhart with Howard R. Green Company said they were commissioned to conduct a traffic study to identify internal and off -site traffic and parking impacts and to determine whether the proposed gymnasiums will adversely impact traffic and parking in the area of the Community Center and South View Middle School. The study area is bounded by W. 601' St. to the north, Lakeview Drive to the south, TH 100 to the east and Wooddale Avenue to the west. In addition to the gymnasiums, there will be building expansion on South View Middle School and the Edina Community Center, as well as the east and west parking lot and reconfiguration of South View's parking lot. Manhart said they used historical traffic count data dating back to 1975 as well as more current counts (1995- 2004), provided to them by the Engineering Department. Through data analysis and observation of the area, the study identified the following: • Local streets have high access but low mobility; principal arterials have low access but high mobility; • Traffic on roadways free flows at Level of Service (LOS) A (LOS -D or better is generally acceptable in the Twin Cities); • Relocation of South View's students drop -off location will pull more vehicles off Southview Lane; Projected Traffic and Parking Demand • Daytime Scenario: No additional trip generation /parking for school's gym; 320 additional trips and 40 parking stalls required for the Community Center's gym (assuming 4 ninety- minute sessions and 40 people per session daily for multi- purpose activities); • Evening Scenario: 120 trips created by two simultaneous practices /games per gym (assuming 40 participants, 4 coaches and 8 spectators); 30 additional parking stalls per gym, but up to 60 spaces to accommodate change over between sessions; • Tournament Weekend Scenario: Four sessions on Friday night per gym ( =4x40 trips x 2 gyms) equals 320 additional trips; eight sessions on Saturday per gym ( =8x40 trips x 2 gyms) equals 640 additional trips; six sessions on Sunday per gym ( =6x40 trips x 2 gyms) equals 480 additional trips. • On- street parking restrictions seem to be in compliance; most parking are on Southview Lane and side streets during weekend tournaments, especially St. Andrews; • Weekend tournament traffic travels primarily along collector streets ( Southview Lane, Concord Ave. and Norma nda le, Rd.); In conclusion, the study found that "Levels of Service will not degrade appreciably as a result of the construction of the new gymnasiums and upon completion of the proposed parking lot changes, on- street and off - street parking supply will adequately serve weekday, evening and tournament weekend demands." 3 Richards indicated that the school should provide adequate off - street parking since they are continuing to intensify usage of the area. Plante concurred and stated that the traffic issue should have been addressed ahead of time and not after - the -fact. Dovolis said usage of the area would intensify even more when new programs are added and even if they were to provide adequate off - street parking, the number of trips generated will be an issue. Bennett said the number of vehicles is over what some members of ETC said is unacceptable for a residential area and there has been a lack of communication with the residents. White suggested creating an alternative transportation system to reduce the number of trips. Thorpe asked what could they do at this point considering that everything appears to be in place and construction has already begun. Lillehaug said funding for the gyms is yet to be approved. Residents in attendance commented as follow: Julie Risser, 6112 Ashcroft Ave. Risser stated that Valley View Rd should have been included in the study because it is used heavily when events are over and while the study addressed traffic on Normandale Rd, it did not address the excess traffic that Valley View Rd will carry. She said Valley View Rd is a 1.1 miles speedway road with one only one place for drivers to stop between Normandale Rd and Hwy 62. She said the only designated crosswalk for students at Concord and Valley View Rd is dangerous because the flasher is on constantly and is therefore ignored by drivers. She said there is also a 'dip' in the road just before the crosswalk that makes it difficult for drivers to see an adult crossing, let alone children. She said the sidewalk does not go all the way through and students must be bused 2.5 blocks from Concord Elementary because Valley View Rd is too dangerous to cross. She is also not happy with the increased traffic in the area. Ron Wenaas, 5617 Sherwood Ave. Wenaas stated that he is disappointed that the traffic study only considered the impact of two gyms and not all four that are planned. He said the operating hours used in the study is not correct, it should be from 4 -10:30 p.m. which then doubles the traffic study's assumptions. He said the numbers used to determine trip generations are low and needs to be reconsidered. He stated that the traffic study should have been done based on what the project is going to do to the entire community, not just the effects of two gyms. He said the Edina Community Neighborhood Association implores the ETC to not recommend that they go forward with the gyms. Ralph Overholt, 6321 Rolf Ave. Overholt asked how has the Level of Service changed specifically and are there areas that are more affected than others? He said based on the cost per parking stall, the School Board should get students to bike or use other alternatives. Bennett stated that the Commission does not have an accurate picture of the impact on the community considering that all four gyms were not included in the traffic study. Dovolis concurred, stating that the study does not address all the uses, capacities, functions and future uses. Bennett said the study should not advance until all this information is known. Plante said Valley View Rd should be included in the future study. Dovolis made a motion encouraging a new traffic study that will look at the impact on the entire community, including future potential of sites and withhold approval of gyms until the full impact on the community is known. Seconded by Plante. 4 Ayes: 6 Nayes: 0 Motion carried. III. Old Business a. Update — Transportation Commission Policy Richards said the Council is currently reviewing the policy and it will be back on their agenda for the April 5"' meeting. IV. Approval of Minutes Bennett motioned to approve the February 24th minutes as submitted. Seconded by White. V. Open Discussion White asked that the ETC consider supporting the Transportation Choices 20/20 Bill. Richards asked that it be put on the agenda for next meeting for review and discussion. Resident Overholt suggested that the ETC emphasize alternative to cars — bikes, light rail, etc. to cut back on pollution. Resident Risser concurred with Overholt and stated that pedestrians are not supported. She said there is a need for mass transit and suggested a shuttle connecting the Community Center to the Southdale area. Meeting adjourned. The next meeting is schedule for April 28"', 6:00 -8:00 p.m., in the Community Room, City Hall. The new ETC meeting date (third Thursday of every month) will take effect in May. 5 MEMBERS PRESENT: Fred Richards, Marie Wanninger MEMBERS ABSENT: Dean Dovolis MINUTES OF THE Edina Transportation Commission Thursday, April 28, 2005 Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Community Room Thorpe, Jean White, Warren Plante, Jon�Kelly Bennett, Les STAFF PRESENT: Steve Lillehaug, Sharon Allison L Call to Order Chair Richards called the meeting to order. It. New Business a. Handouts Commissioner White) White explained that Edina's Statd'Rep�e would create a dedicated source of fud White said the bill is connected to..,ETC's funding) and #10 (having-park and ride I also affect pedestrians. White saidArr subsidies'for not taking ar modal transl approach. A money is sp�ant on and roads arid,this from current exdenc ition system. She would like the ETC 1 sentative Erhardt authored a transportation bill, which ding for transit -much the same like roadway funding. policy items #9 (encouraging legislature to increase ocations close to mass transit). Thorpe said it would rking than on roads in the twin cities area, as well as Auld be a shift toward putting more money in transit, but Tres for roads. White said this would create a multi - aid other cities are having success with a similar r iiscuss and support the 20/20 plan. During the discussion, many questions were raised, some of which could not be answered immediately. Some responses tithe 20/20 plan thus far are as follow: not in agreement with increasing taxes (Plante}; not./in agreement with dedicated funding source because if not secured by constitution it could be changed by future legislatures; and why not use bonding? ( Wanninger); White will research answers to the questions that were raised. Traffic Studv Initiation and Review Policv (for development and zonin applications) Lillehaug said two new items were added: #5 under Initiation of a Traffic Study and #4 under Traffic Study Findings of Fact, as recommended by the Commission. Bennett suggested rewording item #5 by deleting 'In an instance in which' and starting the sentence with 'Development or...' In items #1 and #2 under Traffic Study Findings of Fact, change 'affect' to 'effect.' Lillehaug explained that the Traffic Study Initiation and Review Policy is a guide to help determine when a traffic study would be needed and is intended to be used only when development and zoning applications are received by the Planning Department. Lillehaug said the City typically initiates traffic studies and trip generation would be a defining parameter for doing them. He said he would like the ETC to leave some flexibility to staff to determine when a study is or isn't needed. Richards said if the ETC did this, it would be staff driven and the need for the ETC would no longer exist. Lillehaug suggested, that the ETC not react to the policy tonight and allow him to research more and revise the policy to ;include traffic studies based on trip generation. After a lengthy discussion of the Traffic Study Initiation nd Review Policy - regarding whether the ETC should identify areas needing traffic studies (proactiv�)6r wait untifre /development application is received (reactive), and who determines when a. tudy should be done/ (staff vs. ETC), the following motion was made by Wanninger and seconded by White: Motion to adopt the Traffic Study Initiation and Review Policy with the following changes: Initiation of Traffic Study: strike items i to iii ;_from item iv delete the words 'Final,' 'Plan' and '(non- single family residential); from item v delete 'ln an instance in which' and begin with 'Development or...' Bennett suggested the following amendment to the motion: change item iv to read 'Development Plan or conditional use permit app'ovals,rivhere an increase....' The amendment failed for lack of a second. Ayes: 5 Nayes: 1 (Plante) Motion carried. Transportation Commission Schedule Beginning with the May meeting, the ETC will melt every third Thursday of the month. This a switch from the 166rth Thursday of the month..; Lillehaug said a joint meeting to discuss the Southdale redevelopment project is being planned with the Council, the Planning Commission and the ETC.`,,Commissioners will be `notified of the date, time and location. On May 19th MnDOT will be meeting with the City seeking Municipal Consent for TH494 and TH169 project. Correspondence — Traffic Signals (Received from Commissioner Bennett) Lillehaug said majority of the traffic; signals within the City belong to other agencies, the City operates only thirteen. He said most of the signals are timed in conjunction with sensors in the roadway activating the signal to minimize delay. The County monitors signals on France Avenue and they have the ability to make adjustments instantaneously. Lillehaug said he does not see a problem with the current operation of traffic signals. Bennett said the correspondence is from someone who is frustrated with the operation of the signals and that she has not personally observed any problems. City of Edina Transportation Commission Policy — April 2005 Richards suggested creating a brochure for distribution to the residents to make them aware of the policy. Plante suggested using the Edina Sun and Wanninger suggested posting the information on the web as well. Staff was instructed to research different styles /types of 2 brochures for Commissioners to review. Staff will work with the City's Communication Director and the Edina Sun to formulate a plan for dissemination of information. Commissioners will revisit this at their June meeting. N. Old Business a. NTMP Scoring and Ranking / Consideration of NTMP Studies to Pursue Lillehaug reported that the NTMP Scoring and Ranking was revised to include W. 56�' St., the entire northeast Edina area and north Schaefer Rd. (application received). He said as discussed before, Gleason and Valley View Rd. is not suitable for the NTMP process because the problem is not a traffic calming issue, it is more of a traffic safety and capacity issue. In terms of ranking, the High School Area is ranked number one, fdIIowed'by the northeast Edina area. Lillehaug said the next step for the NTMP process i$ ;to i entify the benefit - area, develop the Petition -to- Study, which would include identifying the issues and the issue areas, and distribute the Petition -to -Study to the benefited area to get their, feedback,' In the case of northeast Edina and the High School areas, Lillehaug said it is necessary to ,-identify the issues,/and areas because ranking and scoring the entire areas, as will �Qt work well in the NTMP process. The NTMP process will work for the other., reas that'-aT scored and ranked (Parkwood /Knolls area, View Ln. and Schaefer .Rd:, ,W. 56t, "St. and north Schaefer Rd.). Lillehaug recommended proceeding with one,or two of\t�e topped1jank d qualifying NTMP studies but indicated that it is not advisable at thi -time to all four areas due to budget and staff constraints. Lillehaug indicated that a work plan would be.,put together to address the mentioned traffic study areas and the NTMP stuff' ies. 1 After some discussion in which some Commissioners discussed how to go about selecting the areas to start with, Richards reminded th'b Commissioners that a process was developed to make such decisions and after spending 14 months developjng the policy, it is not going to be thrown out so quickly. Richards said, based on \ the-- policy, the areas to start with are determined based on their ranking and dost is passed on to the benefited property owners. Richards said t - hey are confusing., traffic \studies with traffic management and if the Commissioners believe a study -is needed, they'should not wrestle with whether or not it fits in the budget, instead., let the Councildecide'. / / ,t e J Thorpe made a motion to work, on Gleason and Valley View Rd. followed by the northeast Edina area. Seconded by Wanninger. After further discussion Wanninger withdrew his support. White then seconded the motion. Ayes: 2 (Thorpe, White_, Nayes: 4 Motion failed for lack of support. t Wanninger made a motion to' start with Gleason & Valley View Road (High School area). Seconded by Plante. Ayes: 5 Nayes: Abstaining: 1 (Thorpe) 3 4 . nr THE LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS of EDINA 5410 York Avenue Edina, MN 55410 May 2, 2005 Edina City Council 4801 W. 50' Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland and Edina City Councilmembers, On behalf of the League of Women Voters of Edina (LWVE), I am writing in reference to the expansions at the Edina Community Center and South View campuses. LWVE advocates for land use policies that require consideration of environmental impact. Our specific issue of concern is storm water runoff due to the decreased level of permeable surfaces. Permeable land allows precipitation to be absorbed back into the ground; as permeable surfaces decline, the potential for city storm water systems to become burdened rises. While runoff control has been developed, including the holding pond on the field south of South View's parking lot, LWVE would like additional efforts made, including consideration of: Green roofs on the gymnasiums (and if possible, other buildings) -- Green roofs with four - inches of growing material hold most rainfall under one inch; these rainfalls constitute the majority of rainfall events in Minnesota. Green roofs have the additional benefit of doubling the life expectancy of the roof membrane and reducing the heating and cooling costs. Pervious material and rain gardens used in and around parking lots — Materials that allow some penetration of rain water in combination with gently sloping lots that drain water away from both the building and the street and into a rain garden can prove successful. Rain gardens are made in green spaces with low areas where rainwater can collect and seep into the ground. The maps in the Howard R. Green Company's Community Center and South View Gymnasium Traffic Study show the reduction of permeable land on these campuses. To reduce environmental burdens in this area, LWVE strongly encourages the Edina City Council and Board of Education to consider these and other solutions to storm water runoff. Related information on these topics can be found on the Green Institute website, www.greeninstitute.org. You can also contact me with your comments, or questions at 952- 929 -2694, menze002 @umn.edu. Sincerely, Kathy Iver46n LWVE President 2003 -2005 May ii, 2005 Dear Chief Sheerer: The fire on May 4, 2005 at 6509 "WiCCow Wood Road was a frightening experience for us next door at 65n tiViCCaw 'Wood Road. -we had two of our grandchildren, Claire and ,Tustin, staying with us overnight and we were very fortunate to be safe. The damage from the intense heat and flames on our shake roof was minimized by the prompt arrival of the fire crews and their skilftC work. "We were impressed with the professionalism of our firefighters and also with the cooperation of the neighboring fire cretins. It is a blessing to live in such a tinonderfuC city and to benefit from these terrific services. 'With great appreciation, GfYle GZYt�/� d �,T�GZ�'vOJti 9 } 0 9 -A�, / 1, cf- 1 s f ,liEli Ei ! � ��1i.lEIiEEEflE11, 1,1�,EEEtEIil Ellli II I fah. dAA�o lb� I/1 r. G. F E SHE] FAIRVIEW Fairview Southdale Hospital May 3, 2005 Edina Police Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Officers, �\"C'- (:X-\ C�- 6401 France Avenue South Edina, MN 55435 -2199 Tel 952- 924 -5000 I am writing to express thanks, on behalf of the staff working in the Special Care Nursery at Fairview Southdale Hospital, for an outstanding job performed by an officer of the Edina Police Department. Early in the morning of March 181h or i 9th , a mother who had recently delivered a baby at Fairview Southdale Hospital, became very distraught, accusing the nursing staff of inappropriate physical treatment of her newborn girl. She dialed "911 ". The Edina police responded promptly. I was called in and met with the female police officer after she had a long discussion with the distraught mother. I spoke with the mother, and she seemed very relieved that the issues were, at least temporarily corrected. After discussion with the nursing staff members caring for the baby and the mother, the neonatal nurse practitioner, the obstetrician and other staff involved, it became clear that the Edina police officer had done an outstanding job in listening to the mother and reassuring her. We felt that, of all the Fairview Southdale Hospital personnel involved with this incident, the police officer was the person that made the greatest difference. She spent a great deal of time with the mother, and was highly effective in her calming counseling. I am writing to express our genuine thanks to a very dedicated police officer and community member. We dearly appreciated her help. If possible, please pass this on to this wonderful officer. Thank you, .J'1 ;// ell_-� William C. Rosen, MD Neonatology Memo To: Gordon Hughes From: Ceil Smith Date: 5/12/2005 Re: Pre -paid Insurance At the last City Council meeting Mrs. Masica asked about how much of a discount the City received for pre -paid insurance. I spoke with Mr. David Crowther, frorm Hams - Homeyer Agency and found that the City does not receive a discount because we do not actually pre -pay our premiums. Using the term pre payment is for the accounting of the money budgeted for the insurance premiums by the finance department. The City has a policy year that runs from July 1 to July 1, while the City's budget year runs from January 1 to January 1. From the insurance company's perspective we do not pre -pay because we pay throughout the policy year. From the City's accounting procedures we identify money that is budgeted in one year and paid in the next year as pre -paid. The City is getting a break from its insurance companies because they let the City pay on installments and do not charge any additional fees for the service. • Page 1 r EDINA COMMUNITY HEALTH COMMITTEE MEETING Tuesday, December 7, 2004 Community Room City Hall MEMBERS PRESENT: Lynn Moline, Bill Alldredge, Brad Montgomery, Tolu Oyelowo, Idelle Longman MEMBERS ABSENT: Richard Olson, Debbie Cook, and Spencer Anderson OTHERS PRESENT: Roz Johnson, Bloomington Public Health STAFF PRESENT: Solvei Wilmot ROLL CALL The meeting was called to order at 7:10 p.m. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A correction was made to the Minutes of the September 21, 2004 meeting. A date reference was incorrect. Ms. Moline, MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 21, 2004, MEETING AS CORRECTED. Mr. Montgomery SECONDED. MOTION CARRIED. TOBACCO UPDATE Ms. Johnson distributed an update on Hennepin County's Ordinance #24. This is a no smoking Ordinance that will go into effect on March 31, 2005. It will impact all establishments that serve food. Ms. Johnson reported that she has been in meetings with Minneapolis, Bloomington, Richfield and Edina to work on educational information regarding the smoking ban and to track if the smoking ban has a financial impact. MPAT, Minnesota Partnership Against Tobacco will help fund the education portion. MPAT is also looking at economic impact, change in public opinion, smoking cessation and air quality. Ms. Johnson presented an example of signage for establishments. The signs will have the local enforcement agency phone number. The signs will be posted in March. A member inquired when Bloomington's smoking ban starts. Ms. Johnson commented that their ban starts March 31 also. PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Ms. Johnson presented information on Public Health Emergency Preparedness (PREP). Which is preparing for and responding to bioterrorism, emerging infectious disease outbreaks and other public health threats and emergencies. A part of PHEP is an Emergency and Risk Communication plan. The plan outlines the people who should be contacted should there be a major emergency event. One of the communication forms that has been established is the Health Alert Network. Health information is distributed either by e -mail or FAX pertinent health professionals. Television is also being used to quickly notify special and limited English populations through Twin Cities Public Television's ECHO (Emergency & Community Health Outreach) program. Ms. Johnson commented about the Medical Reserve Corp. This is a statewide program that is seeking medical personnel that would be available to assist during a major health event. More information is available at Hennepin County's website: www.mrc- hennepin.or Commission members suggested getting information to the Minnesota Medical Association about the Medical Reserve Corp. Ms. Johnson commented that some police departments have Citizens Emergency Response Training (CERT) which is a program for citizens to volunteer and prepare for emergency readiness. A member inquired about flu shot vaccine security. Ms. Johnson said that is something the State has been looking into. STATE COMMUNITY HEALTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE ( SCHAC) UPDATE Ms. Wilmot commented that at the September meeting the SCHAC committee presented information regarding formula change for funding distribution. The potential change could reduce the amount Edina receives from the State grant. However, more discussion is pending. Ms. Longman commented there was information regarding emergency preparedness, food allergies, teen pregnancy, and early intervention with emotion behavior disorders. Ms. Longman commented about being able to speak with Commissioner Diane Mandernach one on one at the conference. The Keynote speaker was Janet Porter regarding "The Power of One ". She had a very effective and good presentation regarding an individual's ability to effect a change. OTHER BUSINESS Tri-City Steering Committee Ms. Longman commented that committee members are invited to attended Tri-City Steering Committee meetings. It consists of members from Richfield, Edina and Bloomington focused on prevention, education, and health promotion issues. The meetings are quarterly, 3:30 — 5:30 p.m. UP II Edina Community Health Committee 2005 Meetings. The committee agreed on the meeting dates of March 17, May 17, September 20 and November 15. Human Rights and Relations Committee Ms. Longman reported that the Human Rights and Relations Committee hosted an Intergenerational Dialogue on October 2. Sixty people participated and had good feedback. The Human Rights and Relations Committee has a subcommittee on Bullying, members are invited to participate. Let Ms. Longman know if you are interested. Home Health Services and Contract with Bloomington Public Health Ms. Wilmot commented that Bloomington Public Health provide home health nursing services to Edina residents through a contract. Bloomington Public Health is no longer providing that service due to budget cutting issues and because that service is available from private businesses. Members inquired how many residents received the service in the past year. Ms. Wilmot commented that the nursing program had seen twenty residents; seven were on a consistent need. Eighteen of those residents would be able to receive service from a private nursing service and two would need financial assistant in order to receive nursing service. A member inquired about the contract. Ms. Wilmot stated that approximately forty percent of the contract is for Home Health Services, which is the category that the nursing services are under. Members discussed the limited number of residents that the program served and the high cost of the program. Consideration to enhancing senior programs was made. It was decided to look at the priority list that has previously been developed and consider the options. ADJOURNMENT Ms. Moline MOTIONED TO AJOURN. Mr. Montgomery SECONDED. MEETING ADJOURNED 8:50 p.m. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD TUESDAY, APRIL 12, 2005, AT 7:00 P.M. EDINA CITY HALL — MAYOR'S CONFERENCE ROOM 4801 WEST 50T" STREET MEMBERS PRESENT: Bill Crawford, Peggy Jennings, Marie Thorpe, Lou Blemaster, Karen Ferrara, David Runyan and Ian Yue MEMBERS ABSENT: Chairman Gary Nyberg STAFF PRESENT: Joyce Repya, Associate Planner OTHERS PRESENT: Robert Vogel, Heritage Preservation Consultant I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: Member Jennings moved for approval of the minutes from the March 8, 2005 meeting. Member Crawford seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. II. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS: A. H -05 -1 4604 Bruce Avenue Demolish Detached Garage /Construct a New Detached Garage Planner Repya explained that the subject property is located on the west side of the 4600 block of Bruce Avenue. The home is a 1927 Mediterranean with Italian Renaissance Revival Influence. A 2 -car detached garage is located in the northwest corner of the lot, accessed by a driveway running along the south property line. The subject request involves demolishing the existing substandard 374 square foot (18'x 20') detached garage and building a new detached garage in its place. The plan illustrates the new structure will maintain the same setback as the existing garage, 3.9 feet from the north property line and 14.9b feet from the west property line; a minimum 3 foot setback is required. A new curb cut is not required since the existing driveway will provide access to the proposed garage. Minutes— April- 1212005-- _ - Edina Heritage Preservation Board Ms. Repya pointed out that the new detached garage is proposed to be 484 square feet in area, measuring 22'x 22'. The design of the structure is proposed to compliment the architectural style of the home, incorporating stucco walls and a tiled, hip roof. The garage floor is proposed to be several feet below grade on the rear and sides to accommodate the elevation of the lot. The height of the proposed garage is shown to be. 14 feet at the highest peak in the front and 17 feet in the rear. The height at the eave line is porosed to be 7 feet at the front and 10 feet at the rear. The lot coverage for the property will increase from 27.3% to 29 %. A maximum lot coverage of 30 % is allowed. The closest adjacent structure, the home to the north at 4602 Bruce Avenue is a 1972 Contemporary with an attached garage on the north side, in front of the home. The height of the home is 19 feet to the peak, considerably taller than the 14 foot height proposed for the subject garage. In closing, Ms. Repya observed that Edina's Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum 2- car garage in the R -1 zoning district. The proposed 22' x 22', detached garage is standard for a 2 -car garage, and no variances from the Zoning Ordinance will be required for the proposed plan. Furthermore, the plans provided clearly illustrate the scale and scope of the project relative to the principle home and adjacent properties; and appear to clearly meet the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and the Country Club District Plan of Treatment. Therefore, Staff recommends approval of the, request to demolish ;the existing detached garage and replace it with a new detached garage subject to the plans presented. Neither the homeowner, nor the designer were present at the meeting. Member Blemaster stated that she sold Ms. Slomiany the home several years ago and she can attest that the existing garage has deteriorated to the point that it needs replacement. She added her opinion that the plans presented appear to compliment the home and she would support the request. Member Runyan agreed with Ms. Blemaster pointing out that the proposed plan for the garage compliments the home and is compatible with the adjacent properties. Following a brief discussion, Member Crawford moved approval of the request subject to the plans presented. Member Blemaster seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. III. PRESERVATION MONTH — MAY ACTIVITIES A. Annual Heritage Award Planner Repya reminded the Board that Friday, April 15, 2005 was the deadline to submit nominations for the Annual Heritage Award to be awarded in May. Thus far, no V Minutes — April 12, 2005 Edina Heritage Preservation Board nominations, have been received. She advised the Board that she will keep them updated on the nominations after the 15th. No formal action was taken. B. Baird House Tour Planner Repya explained that Brad and Arlene Forrest had originally invited the Board to tour their home last winter, however, due to scheduling conflicts, the tour was postponed. Since then, it has been decided that with May being Preservation Month, it would be a perfect time for the tour. That being the case, the Forrests are looking forward to welcoming the Board to their home before the regular May meeting on May 10th at 6:00 p.m. Board members marked their calendars and expressed their delight in the upcoming tour. No formal action was taken. IV. OTHER BUSINESS: A. Historic Site Location Map - Discussion For the benefit of the four new members to the Heritage Preservation Board, Consultant Vogel reviewed the landmark designated properties in the City. He explained that the map will assist the Board in keeping track of projects within the city. Mr. Vogel also explained that when the city code was updated in 2002, it was designed to handle up to 50 designated properties, with a projected pace of adding 2 new designations per year (there are currently 5 individually designated properties and one district designation). Board members reviewed the map, asking for clarification on some of the designations. No formal action was taken. B. Preservation of Historic Catalpa Trees / Rare Boulevard Trees - Discussion Consultant Vogel explained that interest has been expressed regarding protection of the Catalpa trees lining W. 44th Street between Browndale Avenue and Wooddale Avenue. He pointed out that these trees are historically significant because Jonathan Grimes who as a nurseryman and President of the Minnesota Horticultural Society brought the Catalpa tree to Minnesota in the 1850's. Apparently, Mr. Grimes had admired the Catalpa as a beautiful, tall, fast growing boulevard tree when visiting Cincinnati. In addition to the trees planted along W. 44th Street, the Minneapolis Park Board also planted 50,000 of the trees throughout the city. In keeping with his interest in the Catalpa, Mr. Grimes wrote several articles touting its merits, which were published in the MN Horticultural Society's bulletins. Mr. Vogel explained that there is a place within Edina's preservation code to designate living things if they are deemed historically significant. Because the Catalpa's are on the �3 - Minutes - April 1 -2 -2005 - -- Edina Heritage Preservation Board City right -of -way, the designation would not be unlike the Cahill School and Grange Hall, which are City owned. Board members asked if Mr. Vogel was looking for a motion favoring designation. He explained that he wanted to go on record identifying the Catalpa as potential for designation. However, before further action is taken, he would recommend that a comprehensive survey of the City be undertaken to identify other trees that might qualify for historic designation. Planner Repya suggested that Mr. Vogel meet with the City Forester, Tom Horwath. She pointed out that Mr. Horwath has worked for the City for a long time and is very well acquainted with the City's tree stock. Mr. Vogel agreed that would be an excellent idea. No formal action was taken. C. Highway 100 /Minnehaha Creek Sound wall - Project Update Consultant Vogel reminded the Board that the Minnesota Department of Transportation was considering the Board's request to revise the sound -wall over Minnehaha Creek to provide a more aesthetically pleasing structure from the creek side. He explained that he has not seen a final plan, but feels confident that some measures will be taken to "soften" the impact. Planner Repya offered to check with Engineer, Wayne Houle to see where the potential revision plans stood. No formal action was taken. D. 50th Anniversary of Southdale Mall - October 8, 1956 Consultant Vogel noted that the 50th anniversary of the Southdale Mall is coming up in October of 2006. He indicated it would be a good idea for the Heritage Preservation Board to work on some sort of commemoration, (perhaps in conjunction with the Edina Historical Society) to recognize this important date in the City's history. Board members agreed that would be an important item to include in future work plans. No formal action was taken. E. Comprehensive Preservation Plan - Update As a means of bringing the new members up to speed regarding the Comprehensive Plan the Board has been working on, Mr. Vogel explained that thus far, the Board has completed the Mission Statement and Vision for the plan. Due to the large turnover in membership, the project was put on hold to allow the new members to gain some knowledge and history about City's preservation activities. He pointed out that the Plan will be a policy manual to guide decision making for the Board and City Council as well as to maintain an institutional memory. Board members were presented copies of the executive summary of the City's Vision 20/20 plan. .,Mr. Vogel pointed out that the preservation plan will serve the HPB, setting out goals, objectives and policies for preservation, much like the Vision 20/20 plan serves to guide decisions impacting the City's future. 4 Minutes — April 12, 2005 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Board members appreciated receiving copies of Vision 20/20, pointing out that the preservation plan should dovetail with this document as well as the City's Comprehensive Plan. No formal action was taken. IV. NEXT MEETING DATE: May 10, 2005, 6:00 p.m. at the Baird House 4400 W. 501h St. VII. ADJOURNMENT: 8:30 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Joyce Repya ofir---- 5 MINUTES MARCH 16, 2005 EDINA RECYCLING AND SOLID WASTE COMMISSION COMMUNITY CONFERENCE ROOM MEMBERS PRESENT: Bill Bryan, Inna Hays, Kathy Frey, Marley Hanson, Dan Rasmus and Tim Brownell MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Solvei Wilmot, Recycling Coordinator ROLL CALL Kathy Frey, Chair, called the meeting to order at 7:05 a.m. MINUTES Corrections were made to the February 16, 2005 Minutes. Mr. Bryan MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES AS CORRECTED FROM THE FEBRUARY 16, 2005. Inna Hays SECONDED. MOTION CARRIED. RECYCLING IN SCHOOLS Ms. Hanson reported that she has sent an e -mail to the administration inquiring about recycling. She is also working with the school newspaper, the Zepherus, for an article regarding Earth Day. In addition, she has requested a school announcement for Earth Day. EARTH DAY This is the 30th Anniversary of Earth Day. Mr. Brownell volunteered to visit South View Middle School's Cyber Cafe and talk about recycling with the students. Ms. Frey volunteered to visit The Hive at Valley View middle school. VOLUNTEER AWARDS Ms. Wilmot inquired about any nominees for the Recycling Award. Ms. Hays has nominated the Edina Park Plaza for their recycling. Mr. Bryan MOVED TO SELECT EDINA PARK PLAZA FOR THEIR OUTSTANDING RECYCLING PROGRAM. Ms. Hays SECONDED. MOTION CARRIED. Ms. Wilmot will prepare a certificate of appreciation for the group and a plant that will be presented at the Volunteer Awards Reception, April 14. AN EDINA RECYCLING GRANT At the previous meeting members had moved to create a recycling grant from revenues generated from the sale of recycling commodities. The Edina Foundation would handle the money. Ms. Wilmot found out that they could not legally have the revenues forwarded to the Edina Foundation. The City Attorney is checking to see if the City could create a grant with the revenues. OTHER BUSINESS Mr. Brownell reported that the National Recycling Coalition (NRC) does not have a scholarship program that would help pay for a representative from the Recycling and Solid Waste Commission. The NRC conference will be held in Minneapolis in August 28 -31, 2005. Ms. Wilmot commented that there are a couple of proposals in the State Senate for product stewardship. If these laws pass, it would put the responsibility of recycling an electronic item back to the producer or the seller of the item. ELECTION OF OFFICERS Ms Hays nominated Bill Bryan as Chair and Tim Brownell as Vice Chair. Nominations were accepted. Members approved. ADJOURNMENT Inna MOVED TO ADJOURN. Marley SECONDED. MOTION CARRIED. 8:25 A.M. EDINA PARK BOARD 7:00 P.M. EDINA COMMUNITY ROOM EDINA CITY HALL APRIL 12, 2005 MEMBERS PRESENT: George Klus, Jeff Johnson, Mike Weiss, Mike Damman, Linda Presthus, Jessica Selleck, Todd Fronek, Jeff Sorem, Karla Sitek MEMBERS ABSENT: Andy Finsness STAFF PRESENT: John Keprios, Ed MacHolda, Janet Canton, Vince Cockriel, Larry Thayer, Tim Hunter OTHERS PRESENT: Mike Wagner, Steve Helgren I. APPROVAL OF THE MARCH 8.2005 PARK BOARD MINUTES Linda Presthus MOVED TO APPROVE THE MARCH 8, 2005 PARK BOARD MINUTES. Jeff Johnson SECONDED THE MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED H. OFF -LEASH DOG PARK PROPOSAL Mr. Keprios introduced Tim Hunter, the Edina Animal Control officer who has worked for the city for 18 months. Mr. Keprios explained to the Park Board that Mr. Hunter informed him that not too long ago a dog owner mentioned to him that he had a strong interest in an off -leash dog park and would be willing to contribute some dollars. Mr. Keprios commented that there are approximately 1,570 households with approximately 1,765 registered dogs. Mr. Keprios noted that there is a history with the Park Board and off -leash dog park proposals to which a feasibility study was done in 2001 and has been included in the Park Board's packet. He commented that at that time they decided it would be in the Park Board's best interest to wait and see what happens. He pointed out that the property they were previously interested in is actually owned by the Minneapolis Water Works Department. He noted that at one point the City of Minneapolis was trying to lease the property to Edina and found out that Minneapolis Water Works wasn't quite ready to make that commitment yet. Mr. Keprios explained that he has now been told that they are going to make a decision this summer on the site as the result of a study they've done. They are either going to hang on to it for several decades or they are going to sell it. Mr. Keprios pointed out that the property is right next to Weber Park and showed the Park Board on a map where it is located. He stated that this is still a viable option if things fall into place. Mr. Keprios indicated that he thinks they are now done waiting and with the great opportunity that is facing them they should take advantage of it and not wait for Minneapolis to make their decision. Mr. Keprios explained that the feasibility study that was done in 2001 identified some areas where they could possibly put a dog park. However, none of them were ideal but at least they are every bit as good if not better than what St. Louis Park is doing to which they've had phenomenal success. He noted that in their first year they had 130 plus people buy $25.00 passes and have had no complaints, it's been very positive. Mr. Hunter pointed out that in all of the research he has done everyone has had similar descriptions in terms of initial fears having a dog park but when it has become a reality there really have been very few issues. Mr. Hunter pointed out that there was a dog park in California that was concerned about liability and over the course of the past seven years it has averaged almost % of a million dogs to which they have not received one complaint in those entire seven years. He noted that information came directly from their City Attorney's office. Mr. Klus indicated that'in the past they talked about having volunteers help man the parks and asked if that would still be part of the proposal. Mr. Keprios responded that the way it works in other communities is they are self - policing and have found that it actually does work. He noted that maintenance staff will maintain the grass and be sure that the garbage is disposed of frequently as well as make sure the fence is in good working order. Mr. Keprios noted that one site they looked at in the 2001 study was Van Valkenburg Park because it's a non - residential area so noise shouldn't be an issue. He indicated that it's not centrally located; however, it does have just over two acres of property at that location. He also commented that it does have a pond in the center of it to which they may or may not want to have it encircled by a fence. Mr. Keprios pointed out that he asked Mr. Cockriel to find out what the linear footage is and what it would cost to put up a fence. He noted that to add to what is already there it would cost approximately $10,000. He stated that if they have a donor who's willing to come up with $5,000 they could provide matching funds within their operating budget. Mr. Keprios commented that he thinks they could make this happen right away with the Park Board and City Council's blessing. Ms. Presthus stated that she remembers, since the last time they talked about this, that Chief Siitari was pretty much against it and was concerned about who would respond to emergency calls particularly because we were working with Minneapolis and St. Louis Park. She asked if Chief Siitari has any concerns about this new site. Mr. Hunter replied that Chief Siitari has pretty much left this in his lap and hasn't expressed anything specifically. However, he hasn't shown him a plan pending what kind of an agreement they come to. Mr. Hunter explained that the way it typically works in other municipalities is it still falls under the jurisdiction of animal control. He noted that as an example Bloomington and Eden Prairie have both year round sites and seasonal sites and 2 historically calls for service at those locations are negligible compared to other calls they receive for service. Ms. Presthus commented that in the past they talked about having some type of alarm device placed at the dog park. Mr. Hunter responded that he personally wouldn't have a concern with that for the simple fact that they already have multiple individuals using the parks at various times and if incidents were to happen there are no current points of communication. For example, if they were to have three individuals running their dog at Pamela Park without his knowledge he's not able to address or respond to that because they currently don't have any additional points of communication. He noted that by having a dog park it won't change the status quo they would still have the same options of using a cell phone and/or driving to the location for service. Ms. Presthus pointed out that her only concern is it's illegal to run your dog in all of the other parks. Therefore, is this something we are sanctioning where we could have a potential liability if something were to happen. Mr. Hunter commented that looking at historical data from other sites this wouldn't be a concern. Mr. Damman stated that he brought that question up in 2001 to which he believes the answer the city attorney gave was it's no more of a concern than someone falling down at a park. Mr. Gilligan made it quite clear that it's covered and not an issue. Mr. Damman asked Mr. Cockriel whether or not he's concerned with the pond and asked whether or not it should be fenced in and, if not, would dogs be allowed to go into the water. He also asked if the water is good for something or is it just run -off. Mr. Cockriel replied that it's a water retention pond and the depth varies over different times of the year. He noted that he and Mr. Keprios did discuss this and it would be his guess that probably at some point they would fence it in with an entrance gate. He noted that personally if he was running his dogs he would want access to it; however, there are people who prefer that their dogs didn't go in the water. He stated that it would be easy to have the area gated off. Mr. Fronek asked how does the Van Valkenburg Park site compare to other parks within Edina. Mr. Hunter replied that, if they were to average all of the sites, Van Valkenburg Park would be one of an average size. He noted that all of the parks have different qualities and aspects to them. Mr. Hunter explained that he thinks Van Valkenburg Park shares a lot of the qualities that he would want in a dog park if he were able to landscape it from scratch. However, to compare Van Valkenburg Park to a lot of the other parks is really difficult because many of the parks carry different qualities and added that cities need to work with the land they have. Mr. Sorem asked if they know how much money this person is willing to donate. Mr. Hunter responded that his thought is rather than contacting this individual he would like to send out a mailing to the entire list of registered dog owners being that so many of them have been asking for a dog park. He stated that he thinks to go to just one person would limit their opportunities and by putting it out there and asking people if they are willing to donate it might just give them enough to look at a second site if the first one works out to be a success. 3 Mr. Johnson asked Mr. Hunter how he would keep track of who has a permit, would he use an orange tag or something like that. Mr. Hunter replied, that he would do a separate tag and make it distinct as well as mark non - resident tags. He noted that a lot of other cities do this as well as they charge a higher rate for non - residents to access the park. Mr. Klus asked Mr. Hunter how often he thinks he's going to have to actually monitor the park to be sure that people really are paying to use it.-. Mr. Hunter responded that he would do it just as he does now by going on regular patrols which gives him an opportunity to talk to the dog owners. He noted that in talking with the animal control officers in Bloomington and Minneapolis by and large they do their regular patrols through the areas just to make sure everything is okay. In addition if they see any dogs that are not permitted a citation is issued. Mr. Klus asked that in order to get a permit do the dogs need to be licensed in the City of Edina to which Mr. Hunter replied that all dogs are currently required to be licensed by city ordinance. He noted that with non- residents he would strongly recommend that they take care of that within their own city. Mr. Hunter commented that some rule of thumb common sense things are no dogs will be allowed in the park if they are registered as dangerous or potentially dangerous, all shots must be up -to -date and all owners/handlers must at least have verbal control over their animals as well as be able to intervene should any of the dogs not get along. Mr. Klus asked what percentage of dogs in this city are actually licensed to which Mr. Hunter replied it's approximately 40 %. Ms. Presthus clarified that it was stated that rather than using an individual donor Mr. Hunter would prefer to send out a notice and ask for contributions if people are willing to donate. Mr. Hunter replied that is correct. Ms. Presthus stated that she has a concern with that because in order to put in $10,000 worth of fencing with matching funds how will we. know what amount of funds will be coming in. Mr. Hunter stated that they can certainly modify the terms and how do word notification because there are a lot of different ways they can handle it. Mr. Keprios pointed out that he would like to take the approach of getting the Edina Community Foundation involved. He noted that it's not good practice for the city to get involved in soliciting funds from its residents. Mr. Keprios asked Mr. Hunter if he had one donor in particular that would be willing to donate to get the dog park up and running on a matching basis. Mr. Hunter replied that he would have to get in touch with the individual he spoke with to see where that person now stands. He stated that he wanted to put this on the table as an option so that they are not relying on any one source because in previous situations he has found that relying on one source is tenuous at best. Mr. Keprios asked Mr. Hunter to talk a little bit about the hockey rink concept and how that works to which Mr. Hunter replied he hasn't had a chance to look at them yet. Mr. Keprios noted that might be an easy one after he does some research and the Van Valkenburg Park site gets up and running. He added that with the hockey rinks they could probably implement it right away and it could be at more than just one site. :I Mr. Keprios indicated that it's staff recommendation to limit at least the first year to residents only because he doesn't know what kind of take they are going to get. Mr. Klus commented that he doesn't know how they would be able to do that to which Mr. Keprios replied it's just his recommendation because not knowing what kind of numbers there will be is the only thing that scares him. Mr. Hunter noted that he thinks at any one time they could accommodate a large number of users in the park. Mr. Keprios indicated that if the Park Board wants to include non - residents he would recommend that they go with the same pricing that St. Louis Park does which is double the price of a resident. Mr. Klus noted that Mr. Keprios' memo states "It is staff s recommendation to approve Van Valkenburg Park as an interim off -leash dog park site on the condition that half of the dollars for the fencing are donated. In addition, staff recommends a resident only trial fee of $25.00 per year". Mr. Klus commented that the only other thing they might want to add to it is to offer it to non - residents for $50.00 per year. Mr. Keprios added that he would like to expand on one point where he uses the term intentionally because if they are going to get a donor of $5,000 or more and it fits within the donations policy they can give permanent recognition. Mr. Keprios stated that if they find out three years down the road that it doesn't work for whatever reason the city reserves the right to eliminate that as a dog park and whatever the donor gave for fencing remains as city property and could be placed at a different park. Mr. Klus asked Mr. Keprios if he is asking the term interim mean a period of three years. Ms. Presthus asked is this something where they will build and hope donations come in or do they get money from the Edina Foundation hoping that it will be covered by future donations. She stated that it is staffs recommendation that the fencing be donated so what comes first fencing or donations. Mr. Keprios stated there are two different things going on not to be confused. First, Mr. Hunter has a single donor to which he doesn't want to rely on that one person. Mr. Hunter stated that he can contact that person to see where they still stand on it. He noted that historically he likes relying on multiple sources but he's open to recommendations in terms of what will work to get the dog park up and running. Mr. Keprios indicated that he would recommend that Mr. Hunter first go to the single source and if the funds are still there then make the request and offer to do matching funds. He noted that it would still be run through the Edina Foundation in order to get a tax deduction and the proper recognition on the plaque at the site. Mr. Keprios stated that secondly if they find the park to be successful then they need to start another dialog about adding another off -leash dog park in the city. Mr. Keprios stated that they are not going to break ground until all of the money is in the bank to which Ms. Presthus replied that was not in the motion but that's her question. Todd Fronek MOVED TO APPROACH THE EDINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ON GIVEN THAT WE CAN GET FUNDING WE WILL AGREE THAT WE WILL BUILD THE INTERIM DOG OFF -LEASH PARK AT VAN VALKENBURG PARK ON THE CONDITION THAT WE WILL MATCH IT. IF THEY CAN COME UP WITH $5,000 OR WHATEVER HALF IS THAT WE WOULD AGREE TO BUILD THE OFF -LEASH DOG PARK. Karla Sitek SECONDED THE MOTION. Mr. Keprios asked the Park Board if they want to address the non - resident issue now or is that a separate issue. Todd Fronek AMENDED HIS MOTION TO INCLUDE BOTH RESIDENTS AND NON - RESIDENTS, RESIDENTS PAYING AT A $25.00 FEE AND NON - RESIDENTS A $50.00 FEE. Karla Sitek SECONDED THE AMENDMENT. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY Mr. Keprios thanked Mr. Hunter for all of his work on this project and noted that it is very much appreciated. III. LEWIS PARK HOCKEY RINK PROPOSAL Mr. Keprios introduced Mike Wagner, current President of the Edina Hockey Association (EHA) and Steve Helgren, Ice Coordinator for EHA as well as Larry Thayer, Manager of Braemar Ice Arena. Mr. Keprios recapped that at the last Park Board meeting the recommendation made was to put in a hockey rink at Todd Park and to not put $40,000 into the hockey rink at Countryside Park. It was decided to put the hockey rink back at Countryside Park once they have the dollars to redo a master plan and replace the hockey rink in the proper north/south orientation. Mr. Keprios indicated that per the Park Board's request he has sent out a memo to the residents of Todd Park informing them that the Park Board is going to put their final stamp of approval on this and are requesting the residents input on this concept. He added that he has already received three responses which were all positive. Mr. Keprios stated that also discussed at last month's Park Board meeting was the possibility of adding a second rink at Lewis Park. He noted that they also talked about the idea of putting a cover over one of them and perhaps have it double as a picnic shelter during the summer months. Mr. Keprios indicated that he met with Mr. Thayer, Mr. Wagner and Mr. Helgren and discussed how the city could better serve EHA's program needs. It was noted that if EHA's projections are correct they should have approximately 1,225 skaters. Mr. Keprios indicated that they discussed what ERA's true program needs are and it was decided that what they really need is a great practice venue that they can count on during the hockey season. He pointed out that they talked about putting something at Braemar but decided that it would be too expensive because they would have to put in retaining walls etc., and it didn't seem to make sense financially. Mr. Keprios explained that they then came up with the idea of putting something at Lewis Park that could double as a picnic shelter with portable hockey boards. He noted that they could also put down a concrete slab which would continue to leave the door open for artificial refrigeration and felt this is an idea they should explore. 6 Mr. Keprios indicated that he is asking for the Park Board's support of the concept to explore a permanent structure with open ends. In addition, look at the feasibility of putting one of Braemar's propane ice re- surfacer machines at Lewis Park which would guarantee good ice a little longer in the season, however, not a tremendous additional amount unless they were to put in artificial refrigeration. Mr. Keprios stated that what he is recommending is that they do a feasibility study and hire a professional to see what different options they could do as well as what each scenario would cost. Mr. Keprios pointed out that it's going to cost money to get answers to a lot of their questions and that is why he has asked EHA if they would be willing to fund the consultants study to get them off of square one. Mr. Johnson commented that Lewis Park is heavily used by non - residents and therefore he would like to see the EHA mite program fill up the ice time as much as they can. In addition, that rink will be a little more regulated because it will have a Zamboni driver. Mr. Klus asked if they would potentially be adding staff to Lewis Park to which Mr. Johnson replied possibly. Mr. Johnson noted that in the long run it's going to be much better than trying to put in a fourth sheet of ice at Braemar. Mr. Keprios stated that he really applauds Mr. Thayer's recommendations on this topic in that we should take baby steps and not necessarily jump in with a refrigeration system. Wait and see what they get out of a roof and an ice re- surfacer machine first because they can always add a portable system in the future. Mr. Wagner pointed out that it would be very helpful to EHA if they could migrate some of their mite program to an outdoor sheet of ice that they can-depend on. He noted that ultimately they would love to have refrigeration, however, if the budget is not there just having a cover over the ice and an ice re- surfacer would certainly be a great help. Mr. Klus asked Mr. Helgren and Mr. Wagner how much EHA would be willing to contribute towards this. Mr. Wagner replied that he has no idea what it would cost to do a feasibility study like this. He indicated that he knows where their budget is and what they have available and that they certainly would be willing to help with the process. Mr. Keprios commented that he also doesn't know how much the feasibility study would cost but would like to get a request for proposal and submit it to a couple of different firms and see who comes in the most competitive. Ms. Sitek commented that EHA definitely needs another sheet of ice soon because with the addition of the girls program everything has doubled and it's only going to get worse. She noted that obviously the perfect thing would be to add a fourth sheet of ice at Braemar but given that isn't going to happen right now this would be a very good alternative as long as the ice is good. Mr. Fronek indicated that he thinks it's great to add ice anywhere they can and noted that they may want to even look at other parks. He commented that Pamela Park has some places where they could add a bigger skating area. He noted that he doesn't see a problem with Lewis Park but maybe they should pursue other options. 7 Mr. Sorem asked what type of hourly rental fees would they be looking at because people would definitely pay to use that ice. Mr. Keprios replied that there would definitely be a rental charge. Mr. Wagner stated that EHA would absolutely pay an hourly rental fee. Mr. Keprios commented that he thinks if they charge a rental fee as well as program the rink properly the non - resident issue at Lewis Park should go away. Mr. Klus asked Mr. Thayer what he thinks about this concept to which Mr. Thayer replied that there is no question that there is a need by the ERA. Mr. Thayer noted that with an ice re- surfacer and protection from the sun is a very good first step. Having anything on a more permanent basis is going to cost a lot more money. Mr. Klus asked Mr. Thayer about the ice re- surfacer to which he replied their fourth re- surfacer is rarely used and therefore it could be incorporated right now. Mr. Klus asked Mr. Cockriel how he feels about this concept and staff wise would he be able to support what needs to be done for those few months. Mr. Cockriel replied if they are looking at his staff to run an ice re- surfacer 12 hours a day for 7 days a week then yes he does have issues. Mr. Cockriel stated that as far as workload there are no issues, they can handle it whether it's one sheet of ice or two. Mr. Keprios commented that he thinks it's fair to assume that Mr. Cockriel's staff would build the ice and get a base and that they would hire a warming house attendant and train that person to drive the ice re- surfacer. He noted that they will not have a full -time staff person sit at the park all day the drive the ice re- surfacer. Ms. Presthus indicated that she would really like to see someone seriously research the refrigeration systems that are out because in St. Paul she has seen it work and it works well. Therefore, if they are going to do a feasibility study they really should add that piece into it. Mr. Keprios replied that he thinks that will be part of the feasibility study to which they could maybe give us some ballpark numbers. Mr. Klus indicated that he thinks Mr. Keprios is looking for a motion tonight to proceed with this concept so that he can move ahead and work on getting a feasibility study. He noted that once they receive the data they can then take the next step. Mr. Wagner asked if it would help the Park Board if EHA would commit to a certain amount of funds to which Mr. Klus replied he doesn't know at this time what that dollar amount will be. Mr. Klus commented that it's hard to ask for money when they don't know how much they need to ask for. Mr. Keprios commented that he thinks it would cost approximately $5,000 to $7,000 to get the job done. Mr. Klus stated that he doesn't think they need to put a dollar amount on it and noted that at this time the Park Board can support it in concept. Mr. Fronek asked if they need to authorize staff to put out a request for purchase. Linda Presthus MOVED TO AUTHORIZE THE PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT TO GO AHEAD WITH A FEASIBILITY STUDY AND THE CONCEPT OF LOOKING AT LEWIS PARK FOR AN ICE RINK, SHELTER 8 FEASIBILITY PROGRAM. AND REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL AND WORK WITH THE HOCKEY ASSOCIATION TO HELP FUND IT. Karla Sitek SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. IV. PARK BOARD COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT PROJECTS Mr. Klus informed the Park Board that the results from the survey that Mr. Keprios sent out indicate that the Park Board community involvement project will be planting trees on Arbor Day at Cornelia School Park. He noted that Arbor Day is Friday, April 291h and the tree planting will take place at 10:00 am. Mr. Klus asked the Park Board members to try to attend this event if their work schedules permit. Mr. Keprios commented that if any of the Park Board members do not want to do any physical labor that's okay but would still like for them to attend so that the community can meet their Park Board members. Mr. Klus thanked everyone for their input on the survey and noted that he would like to see these suggestions on future agendas. He noted that maybe later in the year they can move ahead with another project. Therefore, they will put this back on next month's agenda. V. UPDATES A. Kojetin Park — Mr. MacHolda informed the Park Board that the bid opening on the Kojetin Park playground was held on March 22nd and the low bid came in just under $108,000. He noted that Koolmo Construction will be doing the project and will start on it in mid -June. B. Gymnasium Proposal — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that the Planning Commission has recommended unanimously to approve the conditional use permit to which that recommendation will go before the City Council on April 19th. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that the Edina Community Center neighborhood committee will be showing up at the meeting because they are going to try to do everything they can to kill it. He stated that he has sent an e -mail to the users groups to show up in numbers at the City Council meeting if they want to see this pass. Ms. Presthus asked what is the issue with the neighborhood committee to which Mr. Keprios replied it's traffic and safety. He explained that the traffic study that was done shows that there is going to be an increase in traffic; however, the traffic engineer study doesn't suggest any major changes to roads or signs needed as a result of the increase in traffic. Mr. Klus asked Mr. Keprios how he feels about this to which he replied he is under the impression that the City Council is very supportive of the project. Mr. Klus asked about the cost to which Mr. Keprios replied that it has gone from 5.3 million to 4.7 million thanks to Mr. Johnson and his fellow JPOC members for making some tough value engineering decisions. However, it might go as high as 4.9 million if the add alternate is accepted which would be to put the concession stand back in at the school district's expense. Mr. Keprios added that he thinks this is very functional and is going to fit the program to which they can be very proud of their elected officials for this. Ms. Presthus indicated that she has been getting hit left and right with a block of negatives that has really irritated her. She noted that somewhere the community doesn't know that they have looked at every site and piece of property in the city for years about how this could be done. She stated that people think the city just jumped on this because the school sold us a bill of goods, however, that's not the case and that's not how it came about. Ms. Presthus commented that maybe they need to put something in the Sun Newspaper. Mr. Johnson stated that maybe they should send a letter to the editor saying they have been working on this for years and it was done right, we need to state the facts. Mr. Klus stated he would be willing to sign his name on a letter to the editor if staff could help him with all of the facts on everything that has been done. Mr. Keprios pointed out that for what it's worth the most important thing to do at this point is for the proponents to show up at the City Council meeting on April 19. It's important to have support in the audience because that's going to mean a lot more than a letter to the editor. C. Grandview Square — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that they are $10,000 short on donations. He noted that the proposal Mr. Crockett made a couple of days ago was if Ron Clark Construction and Opus put their committed dollars into the Edina Community Foundation bank account, then the Edina Community Foundation will commit to raising the remaining $10,000 that they are short by approaching business and residents of the Grandview Square development. Mr. Keprios noted that they will break ground as soon as the dollars are in the bank and they've got a signed contract. D. Term Limits — Mr. Klus informed the Park Board that the City Council has passed term limits. Mr. Keprios explained that they passed a nine year maximum that anyone can serve on a board or commission consecutively. However, there is a stipulation that if someone has ended their ninth year and there are no qualified candidates that person can continue to serve. Mr. Keprios commented that there was also a recommendation to limit the length of the chairmanship to three years. The suggested term of the chair was not adopted as policy, just a recommendation. VI. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS MASTER PLAN A. Bredesen Park Needs - Mr. Klus noted that at Bredesen Park the water quality people have done a great job in getting rid of the duckweed. He stated that there are a lot of people who live around Bredesen Park who care a lot about it. Mr. Klus added that Mr. Cockriel's staff has done some resurfacing in the last couple of years that is now a really nice path. He pointed out that Dr. Hulbert was the person who brought this forward and wanted it to be looked at. Mr. Klus asked Mr. Cockriel if he has some insight on where he sees the vision of Bredesen Park going and what we are doing there. Mr. Cockriel replied that they have replaced another 1,000 feet of fencing within the last month as it relates to the interior nature part of it. He explained that their plans this year are to 10 resurface some of the bad areas around the walking and biking trails. He noted that because of the soil that is there all of the black top has floated on fabric so there is no certain way to ever resurface it and have it last 20 years. Therefore, it will always be an ongoing maintenance issue as far as keeping the path free of cracks. Mr. Cockriel stated that they have also replaced the restroom stalls within the building. Mr. Klus asked if those restrooms are on a timer to which Mr. Keprios replied not but that they will be soon. Mr. Keprios noted that he has proposed that Bredesen Park be put on the August Park Board agenda Mr. Klus asked Mr. Keprios what agenda will the walking paths and sidewalks be put on to which Mr. Keprios replied that will be a September agenda item. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that Janice Carter, a member of the Edina Conservation League, gave Mr. Cockriel, Mr. Houle and himself a rather lengthy power point presentation. The presentation showed all of the testing results and all of the graphs that they've been doing to which they had several recommendations for the city. He noted that they wanted the Park Board tonight to take action on one of their recommendations which is to put signage around Lake Cornelia in both English and Russian stating "Don't Eat the Fish ". Mr. Keprios explained that a few of the other recommendations included having the city take over all of the testing of the lakes and hiring an engineer to study the water run -off from the streets. He stated that Mr. Houle explained to her what the jurisdictions are as well as who is in charge of what. Mr. Keprios explained that at the end of the presentation they agreed that they had some great ideas but they should serve more as a community advocacy group to educate the people who live around these bodies and teach them about the importance of creating and maintaining buffers. He pointed out that the Edina Conservation League should be a community advocacy group with their main purpose being to educate homeowners about the benefits of clean water. The Edina Conservation League should educate homeowners on how to create better buffers and do better lawn management that is more environmentally friendly. Mr. Keprios noted that he thinks that is the agreement that they came to. He indicated that Ms. Carter was going to bring this back to her activist group to see if they support those ideas. Mr. Klus commented that he discussed this with Mr. Keprios and felt that they really didn't need to take an hour of the Park Board's time. He noted that he thinks the Park Board should gather the report and review it as a board and then make a consensus on what the Park Board feels is important for them to hear from the Edina Conservation League. Mr. Keprios pointed out that the actions they were asking of the Park Board are out of the Park Board's jurisdiction; however, he does think it would be good public relations to listen and let them educate us. He indicated that maybe the Park Board can make some suggestions on how their efforts could be well spent and make it a positive because they are well intentioned. Mr. Keprios asked the Park Board if they would allow him to tell the Edina Conservation League that they have their support and would invite them to attend the June Park Board meeting. Mr. Klus noted that he would be fine with that as long as they stay within the parameter that is set for them. 11 B. Athletic Association President's Meeting - Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that tomorrow night at 6:00 pm in the Mayor's Conference Room there will be a meeting with all of the athletic association presidents. He noted that they have a pretty refined agenda which consists of talking about facilities and overlapping seasons. Ms. Presthus suggested to Mr. Keprios that he mention that they may want to attend the City Council meeting. Mr. Keprios replied that he will mention that. He also invited any Park Board members who are interested to attend tomorrow night's meeting. C. Vince Cockriel's Staff - Mr. Keprios noted that he would really like to compliment Mr. Cockriel's staff and the job they did this past winter. He indicated that Edina had their outdoor ice rinks open longer than anyone else in the Twin Cities area. He stated that they did an incredible job and he received many compliments this year on the great ice that they had and wanted the record to reflect this. D. Edina Police Department/Walnut Ridge Park - Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that they have had someone continually breaking into Walnut Ridge Park, and leaving beer cans, pot pipes, etc. He noted they were unable to figure out how they were able to get into the building without breaking anything. He stated that the Police Department used a portable alarm system and were able to catch these kids right away so hats off to the Police Department who did a stellar job. Two Edina resident juveniles were arrested that evening and brought to the Police Station with charges pending. VII. ADJOURNMENT Jeff Sorem MOVED TO AJOURN THE MEETING AT 8:45 P.M. Karla Sitek SECONDED. MEETING ADJOURNED. 12 May 4, 2005 Steve Grausam, director of liquor operations Edina Liquor 6755 York Ave. So. Edina, MN 55435 Dear Steve Grausam, I'm the woman who, not quite two weeks ago, was charged for 10 bottles of Lillet, rather than 1, resulting in about a $160 overcharge on my credit card. I just wanted to write and tell you how much I appreciate your response to the situation. Initially I was frustrated, because when I went to the store to straighten it out on the Monday after buying the wine, the clerk wouldn't do anything except hand me your card. I walked out muttering to myself that I would NEVER shop there again. But you turned that around by your courteous and prompt response when I called you. The bottle of wine you gave me because I had had to make two trips to get the situation fixed was nice, but really way above and beyond what I needed. I just wanted someone to acknowledge that there had been a mistake and then to make it right —which you did, instantly. So I walked out feeling very good about the kind of customer service you clearly want and perform. I'm not a big liquor consumer, so whether I shop at a store or not isn't going to mean much on your bottom line. But I have told the story about how you responded to a number of people and some of them may tell it to others and /or shop at the store themselves. It's a small thing, but that's the way reputation grows. Again, thanks for your response. Good customer service is, unfortunately, rare enough that I definitely want to recognize and applaud it. Yours, -- - - - -- -- - - - - -- - -- - Linda Picone 4214 Harriet Ave. S. Minneapolis, MN 55409 783 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 273 Regular Meeting, May 9, 2005 Room 349, Edina Community Center AGLNDA Determination of Quorum and Call to Order Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting of April 14, 2005 Approval of Minutes of Meeting of April 18, 2005 HEARINGS OF INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS, AND PRESENTATION OF PETITIONS FROM THE PUBLIC REGARDING ITEMS BEFORE THE BOARD FOR ACTION OR ON ANY OTHER ISSUE ( *SEE ATTACHED DETAIL.) PRESENTATION ➢ "Connecting with Countryside" — Countryside Elementary Media Specialist Dawn Nelson and Teachers Jennifer Gross, Kristin Mickelson, Katie Paulson, and Bill Weird; and Students Carly Christ, Audrey Dyson, and Laura Nierengarten • Connecting with Kids Service Project • Technology Fair Award - Winning Project • Writing Project with Flat Stanly (children's book character) REPORTS ➢ Edina High School Prairie Restoration Project — Eric Burfeind, Science Teacher, Edina High School ➢ West Metro Education Program/The Choice Is Yours /National Urban Alliance — Maria Giampietro, Director of Administrative Services ➢ Marketing — Laura Tueting Nelson, Director of Communications & Public Affairs ACTION 450 Personnel Recommendations 784 -788 451 Expenditures Payable on May 9, 2005, appended 789 452 2006 -2007 Early Childhood Through Grade 12 School Calendar 790 -792 453 Board of Education Meeting Dates for 2005 -2006 793 454 Proposed Capital Fund Budget, 2005 -2006 794 -795 455 Purchase of Print Shop Pro Software System 796 456 Purchase of Substitute Teacher Management System 797 457 Purchase of McAfee Active Virus Defense Suite Licenses 798 458 New Policy 3519 — Non - Instructional Operations: Turf 799 -800 Management Plan 459 Sidewalk Project for Highlands Elementary School 801 460 Edina High School Prairie Restoration Project 802 CONSENT 461 Community Education Services Personnel Recommendations 803 -804 462 Lease Agreement with Republicans — Senate District 41' 805 463 Lease Agreement with the West Metro Education Program 806 464 Lease Agreement with Daystar, U.S. 807 465 Lease Agreement with Minnesota Distance Running Association 808 466 Lease Agreement with Minnesota Council for Gifted & Talented, Inc. 809 467 Gift from Edina Cheerleading 810 468 Gift from Edina High School Parent Council 811 469 Gift from Anonymous Donor 812 470 Gift from US Bank 813 INFORMATION 471 Expenditures Payable on April 25, 2005, appended 814 472 Bond Fund Expenditures Payable on April 28, 2005 815 -816 473 Enrollment as of April 29, 2005 817 474 New Procedure 3519 — Non - Instructional Operations: Turf 818 -820 Management Plan 475 Countryside Elementary School Continuous Progress Program Trip to 821 Camp St. Croix, Hudson, Wisconsin 476 Recognition of Staff 822 Adjournment *Persons who wish to address the Board are requested to complete and submit an appropriate form to the Board Secretary prior to the designated hearing time. When recognized, each individual shall identify himself /herself and the group represented, if any. He /She shall then state the reason for addressing the Board and shall be limited in time at the discretion of the Board Chair. Individual employees of the School District or representatives of employee organizations shall have utilized administrative procedures before making a request to address the Board. F R 01 To: John Keprios, Director, Edina Park & Recreation Department Cc: James Hovland, Mayor, City of Edina Edina City Council Scot Housh Alice Hubert Linda Masica Ann Swenson Edina Park Board Mike Damman Todd Fronek Alice Hulbert Linda Presthus Karla Sitek Mike Weiss Andy Fisness Jeff Johnson George Klus Jessica Selleck Jeff Sorem From: CONCERNED NEIGHBORS OF TODD PARK We offer the attached petition as partial feedback to your letter of April 7, 2005 describing a proposal for a hockey rink in Todd Park. The overwhelming majority of Todd Park neighbors object to the proposal. While a number of neighbors may have submitted feedback independently, the attached demonstrates a position of solidarity of the neighborhood against the proposal. We anticipate forwarding additional signatures in advance of the meeting of the Park Board next Tuesday, May 10t`. To: John Keprios, Director Edina Park & Recreation Department Cc: City of Edina Park Board From: CONCERNED NEIGHBORS OF TODD PARK Date: April 20, 2005 Re: PROPOSED HOCKEY RINK AT TODD PARK The undersigned strongly object to the proposal outlined in your letter of April 7, 2005 for establishing a hockey rink in Todd Park. While difficult to respond to the vague proposal contained in your letter, we assume for purposes of this petition that the proposal involves a permanent surface surrounded by a permanent board structure. The neighbors of Todd Park take a very active role in the care & upkeep of the Park. A recent example is the large number of volunteers involved in last fall's Buckthorn eradication efforts. Neighbors also routinely police & cleanup Park grounds to maintain its suitability for family use. While we support the Edina's interest in increasing rink availability, we strongly object to the use of Todd Park as the locale for, among other reasons, the following: EROSION OF FAMILY USE PARK SPACE Todd Park is currently highly utilized, particularly in the summer months. An additional permanent structure in the Park would eliminate a large swath of field that receives significant summer -time use by families attempting to keep children from harm's way of, or interfering with, the other organized sports activities in the park such as softball, basketball, tennis and the bike path. An additional permanent structure in this location would, in essence, transform the land from a neighborhood park into a city sports facility. SAFETY IMPACT OF INCREASED TRAFFIC Safety is a major concern to all of us in the neighborhood — Todd Park is a small park, with short, dead -end streets on its east & west sides. The Park is bordered on its north by an apartment complex catering to the elderly. Division Street, the Parks south border is subject to heavy traffic use by neighborhoods to the west. The on the west side of the park, Vandervork Avenue is already a very busy street, filled with activity of cars filled with children and parents utilizing the playground area, basketball courts and softball field. The high vehicle traffic is already unnerving for parents of young children in the surrounding area. We do not consider increased traffic a positive impact to our neighborhood. LACK OF PARKING Previous proposals from the city included the addition of a parking lot to compensate for the additional usage. A parking lot would not diminish the traffic concern, and would further erode the availability of grassy areas for picnics and other family activities. We certainly do not need further pavement of paradise to put up a parking lot. 1 ... ...- ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT Todd Park is within the Minnehaha Watershed and drains directly into the Minnehaha Creek. The current drain system in the park leaves much to be desired. The Minnehaha Watershed District was not aware of this proposal, and had not been asked to conduct an environmental impact assessment. The District's input on this proposal is essential. In addition, the location of the rink in the watershed will likely lead to continual movement of the rink foundation, requiring constant & costly repair. APPARENT LACK OF PLANNING No Park Board vote should occur until the Board & the public are presented with a detailed study showing, at a minimum, the expected environmental, traffic & safety impact of the proposal. Investment in Todd Park would be better directed to planting of new trees to replace the very old and damaged trees which are currently at risk. It would also be nice if the city would assist in our efforts to clear out the buckthorn. The park shelter building does get a fair amount of usage, but just as the hockey rink was suggested, and rejected, a few years ago, so was the building. It is a shelter the city built without the support of the neighborhood and is now trying to boost its usage to support its existence. The neighbors of Todd Park care very much about the park and have asked for support from our city officials in the past, only to be disappointed, we hope that will not be the case again. We understand there is a need for additional hockey rinks in Edina and hope that there is another park facility that can provide you with more appropriate space. NAAW ADDRESS s. AVIO'l 7 4Xkk+,%zrY- Ir5+ve l I I 1A byt,�Ct?— NAME ADDRESS k�o c r le- Viol(ruo 1 v P L-4. A 2 ?air St 'Iyeip ldzd,�& n.'S- 12- L/ Pin I I 4�ede #L.,,c, 6bi 'and, 5.ASC 4OU-1 y WWO XCAb in lea k SID& Lis N "-/'1 /&-7 ,\j NAME ADDRESS 91 �e -AVC. N to Darlene Wallin Irom: Jennifer Bennerotte ,ent: Monday, May 16, 2005 9:29 AM To: Darlene Wallin Subject: FW: SUPPORT for Doncaster Way sidewalk (city council) - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Jim and Sara Silburn [mailto:ssilburn2357Qmsn.com] Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 9:28 AM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Cc: jsilburn@clynch.com Subject: SUPPORT for Doncaster Way sidewalk (city council) We would like to voice our support for the proposed sidewalk on Doncaster Way. Our neighborhood is facing a significant safety issue that needs to be addressed as a community. Our children need to be able to walk to and from school safely. The current situation on Doncaster does not allow for pedestrian traffic in any fashion that would be deemed safe or reasonable. It is the responsibility of a community to protect it's children. This sidewalk is both reasonable and responsible; it is good citizenship. Our neighborhood demographics have changed significantly in the past five years with houses selling to young families with young children. Additionally, traffic on Doncaster has increased as many of these families eel unsafe letting their children walk to school without a safe sidewalk nor them to walk on. They are thus driving, which only amplifies the problem of high volume traffic on a street with no way for children to traverse safely. We need to lay down issues of aesthetics and cost. People do not tend to like change, but this is not a frivolous request. I have watched cars and buses come within inches of children walking to school (in all seasons). It is past time to address this situation and come to a reasonable decision. The welfare of our children truly is at stake. This sounds hyperbolic, but it is not. Anyone is welcome to stand in our yard and watch the school traffic any morning or afternoon. It is simply not safe. Sincerely, Jim and Sara Silburn 5508 Doncater Way Edina, MN 55436 Page 1 of 1 Darlene Wallin From: LJDENN @aol.com Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 5:33 PM To: charlotte .abrahamson @accenture.com; nonstopfun99 @hotmail.com; dazar @mn.rr.com; hbarcelow @mn.rr.com; 5burkes @msn.com; mchristu @mn.rr.com; jdenn @FSNNORTH.COM; denn @earthlink.net; jdenn @dkyinc.com; lauriedenn @mn.rr.com; cjeichten @yahoo.com; afoley @mn.rr.com; DBFollestad @aol.com; egibbs @mn.rr.com; thehabens @hotmail.com; khoopsmn @hotmail.com; Hussianth @aol.com; Pahussian @hotmail.com; nimholte @mn.rr.com; jgroffsky @yahoo.com; lisa @loganlogic.com; BobandEJ @aol.com; skulpinski @mn.rr.com; PMarinovic @aol.com; MelodyChessie @aol.com; nataliejeff @yahoo.com; Ann.Ruschy @Prostaff.com; schwappachs @mn.rr.com; jschwappach @mn.rr.com; ssilbum2357 @msn.com; stych @srspeedy.com; ttomlinson @mn.rr.com; SJWwalkerdesign @ aol.com Subject: Fwd: Sidewalk on Doncaster Way Hello Neighbors - Just received this from Becky Danielson today. For those of you who have already seen it, sorry about the duplicate note. If you are in support of sidewalks on Doncaster Way an email to the address listed below would be most helpful. There is some opposition as well so they do need to hear from those of us who are in favor of the project. Thanks for your ear- Liz 5/17/2005 Page 1 of 1 Darlene Wallin From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 8:09 AM To: Darlene Wallin Subject: FW: Sidewalk on Doncaster Way - - - -- Original Message---- - From: PMarinovic @aol.com [mailto:PMarinovic @aol.com] Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 9:26 PM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: Fwd: Sidewalk on Doncaster Way In a message dated 5/16/05 5:32:53 PM, LJDENN writes: jbennerotte @ci.edina.mn.us Just wanted to send a note of my support of sidewalks on Doncaster Way. Patti Marinovich 5516 Merritt Circle. Edina 952 926 -5050 5/17/2005 Page 1 of 1 Darlene Wallin From: SBDan920 @aol.com Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 5:01 PM To: LJDENN @aol.com Subject: Sidewalk on Doncaster Way Liz, Printed below is the contact information for the Edina City Council. Please send an e-mail voicing your concerns regarding a sidwalk on Doncaster Way. Also, please forward this contact information to anyone in the neighborhood who may be interested in the project. Thanks! Scott & Becky Jennifer Bennerotte Communications Director City of Edina 952 - 833 -9520 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 jennerotte@ci.edina.mn.us 5/17/2005 Darlene Wallin From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 8:21 AM To: Darlene Wallin Subject: FW: Yes to Doncaster Way sidewalks! - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Natalie Wu [mailto:nataliejeff@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 8:08 PM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: Yes to Doncaster Way sidewalks! To Whom It May Concern: We live in the Highlands neighborhood and are very much in favor of sidewalks on Doncaster Way. We have 3 children, 2 of whom attend Highlands Elementary School. We like to walk to school but feel very uneasy walking up Doncaster Way, especially with all the traffic going to the school at that time. It is hard to believe that there are not already sidewalks there. It is time to put them in! Thank you, Natalie Wu 5208 Chantrey Road Edina Discover Yahoo! Find restaurants, movies, travel and more fun for the weekend. Check it out! http: / /discover.yahoo -com /weekend.html May 14, 2005 Mr. Wayne D. Houle Director of Public Works / City Engineer City of Edina 4801 W. 50" Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Houle, A letter was received from Mr. Steve Lillehaug, dated November 1, 2004 inviting the residents of the Doncaster Way Area to an informational meeting, scheduled for November 9, 2004 on a proposed sidewalk project. The map on the back of that letter clearly showed the proposed sidewalk running along Doncaster Way from Vernon Ave. to the Highlands Elementary School entrance. (See attached map.) During that informational meeting, one of the residents asked why the sidewalk didn't go all the way down to Ayrshire Blvd. The response given to us, at that time was that the traffic study the city conducted indicated that a sidewalk from Ayrshire to the school was not warranted. It has recently come to our attention that the City Engineering department is putting together another proposal that DOES include the stretch of Doncaster Way from the school to Ayrshire Blvd. What many of us find disturbing is that the residents most directly impacted by this proposal had to learn about it by coincidence. There has been no formal communication from the Highlands Site Council, the School District or the City. For example, the Highlands Site Council reported in their minutes of November 11, 2004 in regard to extending the sidewalk down to the park " The neighborhood is aware of these discussions..." In fact, the neighborhood was not aware of these discussions until April Of 2005 when one of us happened to be talking to you about an unrelated matter. When others speak of this proposal it sounds as if it's a "done deal ": We quote from the site council meeting minutes dated February 10th 2005. "The letter that the site council signed was sent to the PTA meeting for their support. Ellen felt that the City Council will most likely approve the side walk proposal for Doncaster Way from Vernon to Ayrshire Blvd." There is an understandable amount of frustration among many of us. Given the lack of communication and engagement it feels like our interests are not being respected in this matter. Our strong preference is that the proposed side -walk from the school to Ayrshire be permanently shelved. At the very least we feel that another neighborhood informational meeting should be held before any action is taken by any other organization in regard to this situation. At this meeting we would like the city to explain to the neighborhood residents what changes took place between November 9th and the present that make this new proposal necessary. We also formally request copies of all correspondence between the City, the Site Council and the School District in regard. to this issue. In addition, we are presenting an alternative solution for the Site Council, School District and the City to seriously consider. At the present time, there are several buses that drive past the corner of Doncaster and Ayrshire Blvd. transporting children to and from Highlands Elementary School. It would seem to us that adding one bus stop for the children who walk that stretch of Doncaster would be a reasonable and simple thing to do. The benefits of this solution are: 1. It is the most cost effective way to deal with the issue as no one would have to pay for the sidewalk and there is no extra cost to the school district. 2. The bus schedules would not have to be altered to accommodate this, as it would be the last stop before school and the first stop after school. 3. Those households with children can feel that their children are safer because they are on the bus. 4. Those households who don't want a sidewalk can feel that their wishes have also been met. We feel that this - solution effectively addresses the wishes and concerns of the entire Doncaster Way neighborhood. It is our hope that this solution will resolve all open issues. In closing we would like to emphasize that our goal is complete transparency in regard to this issue -this is very.reasonable and in everyone's best interests. Yours truly, Name ddress v Copy: Edina City Council i M, I �DS �tiic�s�uL %vu�/ C Peter Hodne, Highlands Elementary Principle Jay Willamson, ISD 273 Ken Dragseth, ISD 273 Superintendent. Highlands Elementary School Site Council Li Location Map Doncaster Sidewalk Project �' r IIz City of Edina Engineering Department October 29, 2004 4: 1 Association of Metropolitan Municipalities DATE: May 12, 2005 TO: Chief Administrative Official FROM: Louis F. Jambois, Executive Director RE: 2005 Elected Officials Salary Survey Enclosed is a copy of the 2005 Elected Officials Salary Survey. Each AMM member city receives one copy free and additional copies may be obtained for $15.00 each. We hope you will find this survey useful. We sincerely appreciate the time and effort each participating city put forth to make this survey possible. Again, thank you and please call Laurie Jennings in our office (651) 215 -4000 if you have questions or want additional copies. 145 University Avenue West Saint Paul, Minnesota 55103 -2044 Telephone: (651) 215 -4000 Fax. (651) 281 -1299 E -mail: amm @amm145.org '�C 1 Association of Metropolitan Municipalities 145 University Avenue West, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55103 -2044 Telephone: (651) 215 -4000 • Fax: (651) 281 -1299 • E- mail. amen @anzm145. org C CITIES WITH POPULt.. oN UNDER 2,500 REG. SPECIAL ANNUAL MAYOR SALARY ANNUAL COUNCIL SALARY 2000 CENSUS MTG./ MTG. MUNICIPALITY POPULATION MONTH PAY 2005 2004 2003 2005 2004 2.003 Bethel 459 2 20 1,200 1,200 1,200 960 960 960 Birchwood 971 1 na 1,000 1,000 1,000 600 600 600 Carver 1,801 2 75 3,600 3,600 * 2,400 2,400 Dellwood 1,070 1 0 588 588 300 300 Elko 765 2 50 3,600 3,000 3,000 2,400 1,800 1,800 Excelsior 2,400 2 0 3,600 3,600 3,600 2,400 2,400 2,400 Gem Lake 442 1 20 1,847 * 739 Greenwood 790 1 na 3,600 * 2,400 Hamburg 545 2 25 1,200 1,200 1,200 720 720 720 560+ 560+ 560+ 280+ 280+ 280+ Hampton 598 1 30 30 /mtg 30 /mtg 30 /mtg 30 /mtg 30 /mtg 30 /mtg Lake St. Croix Beach 1,162 1 10 960 * * 720 Lakeland Shores 355 1 0 2,100 2,100 1,800 1,800 Landfall 748 1 0 4,200 4,200 4,200 2,100 2,100 2,100 Lauderdale 2,364 2 0 3,600 3,600 3,600 2,400 2,400 2,400 Lilydale 654 1 0 4,500 4,500 * 3,000 3,000 Long Lake 1,833 2 na 3,600 3,600 * 3,000 3,000 Loretto 622 2 100/85 1,200 * 1,000 Maple Plain 2,096 2 25 3,600+ �5 3.6 Pub Wks 5,400 1,800 1,800 1,800 Marine On St. Croix 644 1 40 40 /mtg. No salary 480 480 40 /mtg. No salary 480 480 Mayer 780 2 15 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,500 1,500 1,500 Medicine Lake 368 1 na 180 /yr 180 * 120 /yr 120 Page 1 • CITIES WITH POPULA ...nl UNDER 2,500 REG. SPECIAL ANNUAL MAYOR SALARY ANNUAL COUNCIL SALARY MUNICIPALITY 2000 CENSUS POPULATION MTG./ MONTH MTG. PAY 2005 2004 2003 2005 2004 2.003 Mendota 198 1 25 1,200 * 900 Minnetonka Beach 618 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 New Germany 346 2 15 780 * * 660 Northfield 665 2 na 8,400 7,200 7,200 6,000 4,800 4,800 Osseo 2,485 2 na 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,380 1,380 1,380 Pine Springs 421 1 na 0 0 0 0 0 0 Randolph 336 3 na 1,200 * * 720 Rockford 177 2 50 1,000+ 60 /mtg 1,000+ 60 /mtg 2,400 750+ 50 /mtg 750+ 50 /mtg 1,950 St. Bonifacius 2,300 2 15 1,700 * 1,400 Spring Park 1,720 2+ 0 4,200 4,200 4,200 3,000 3,000 3,000 Sunfish Lake 530 1 0 0 * 0 Vermillion 442 1 40 820 820 820 640 640 640 Willernie 562 1 20 1,200 * * 720 Woodland 483 1 0 80 * * 40 Page 2 CITIES WITH POPULATION.. .OM 2,500 TO 10.000 Page 3 REG. SPECIAL ANNUAL MAYOR SALARY ANNUAL COUNCIL SALARY 2000 CENSUS MTG.1 MUNICIPALITY POPULATION MONTH MTG. PAY 2005 2004 2003 2005 2004 2003 Afton 2,908 1 0 1,800 1,800 * 1,200 1,200 Arden Hills 9,457 2 reg, 1 work na 3,600 * 3,200 Bayport 3,131 1 0 3,300 3,300 3,300 2,700 2,700 2,700 Belle Plaine 5,002 2 35 3,000 3,000 * 2,800 2,800 Centerville 3,557 2 25 4,200 3,000 3,000 3,300 2,400 2,400 Circle Pines 4,742 2 na 3,300 3,300 3,300 2,700 2,700 2,700 Corcoran 5,850 2+ na 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,200 1,200 1,200 Dayton 4,886 2 0 3,000 3,000 3,000 2,400 2,400 2,400 Deephaven 3,885 2 50 3,600 3,600 3,600 2,400 2,400 2,400 Falcon Heights 5,579 2 na 5,400 5,400 * 3,600 3,600 Greenfield 2,744 2 35 1,200 * 600 Hugo 8,375 2 * 3,000 2,880 3,000 2,400 2,400 2,400 Independence 3,529 2 na 3,000 3,000 3,000 1,800 1,800 1,800 Lake Elmo 7,666 2 0 2,900 2,900 2,900 2,300 2,300 2,300 Little Canada 9,890 2+ 0 4,500 4,500 4,500 3,600 3,600 3,600 Mahtomedi 8,050 2 0 2,400 2,400 2,400 1,800 1,800 1,800 Minnetrista 4,890 2 50 4,800 4,800 * 3,600 3,600 Mound 9,630 2 0 4,500 4,500 4,500 3,000 3,000 3,000 New Prague 3,822 2 0 4,440 4,440 4,440 3,144 3,144 3,144 Newport 3,694 2 0 3,850 3,850 3,850 3,200 3,200 3,200 North Oaks 4,082 1 0 2,700 * * 1,800 Page 3 CITIES WITH POPULATION. _.JM 2,500 TO 10,000 *Hugo pays the same salary for special meetings if there is a quorum. *Watertown Mayor and Council salary depends on 2 council mtgs. 1 workshop and one commission meeting each month. Page 4 REG. SPECIAL ANNUAL MAYOR SALARY ANNUAL COUNCIL SALARY MUNICIPALITY 2000 CENSUS POPULATION MTG.1 MONTH MTG. PAY 2005 2004 2003 2005 2004 2003 Norwood Young America 3,272 2 na 3,600 3,600 3,800 2,400 2,400 2,400 Oak Grove 7,290 2 EDA included 6,723.12 4,100 * 6,082.56 3,500 Oak Park Heights 4,379 2 0 6,000 6,000 6,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Orono 7,687 2 0 4,200 4,200 4,200 3,500 3,500 3,500 St. Anthony 8,012 2 25 5,976 5,976 5,976 4,140 4,140 4,140 St. Francis 6,177 2 na 3,300 3,300 3,300 2,700 2,700 2,700 St. Paul Park 5,052 2 na 3,850 3,850 3,850 3,200 3,200 3,200 Shorewood 7,595 2 0 3,600 3,600 3,000 3,000 2,400 2,400 Spring Lake Park 6,833 2 0 6,819 * 5,455 Victoria 5,198 2 0 2,700 2,700 * 2,400 2,400 Waconia 8,018 2 25 2,400 2,400 2,400 2,000 2,000 2,000 Watertown 3,620 2 25 3600* 1,200 * 2400* 1,080 * Wayzata 4,122 2 0 4,000 4,000 4,440 2,700 2,700 3,000 *Hugo pays the same salary for special meetings if there is a quorum. *Watertown Mayor and Council salary depends on 2 council mtgs. 1 workshop and one commission meeting each month. Page 4 CITIES WITH POPULATIOK ..OM 10,000 TO 20,000 REG. SPECIAL MTG./ 2000 CENSUS MUNICIPALITY POPULATION Anoka 18,275 Columbia Heights 18,698 East Bethel 11,230 Farmington 15,549 Forest Lake 15,692 Ham Lake 14,034 Hastings 19,782 Hopkins 17,643 Lino Lakes 18,368 Mendota Heights 11,635 Mounds View 12,865 North St. Paul 12,273 Prior Lake 19,662 Ramsey 19,208 Robbinsdale 14,068 Rosemount 16,794 Stillwater 16,673 Vadnais Heights 13,270 West St. Paul 19,655 *Lino Lakes has up to four meetings a month CITIES WITH POPULATIOK ..OM 10,000 TO 20,000 REG. SPECIAL MTG./ MTG. MONTH PAY 2 /reg 2003 1 /work na 2+ work na 2 -3 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 reg /2work 0 2 reg /2work 40 /mtg* 2 na 2 na 2 0 2 40 2 0 2 45 /EDA 6,000 60 /Pres 2 reg /1work 35 2 0 2+ 0 2+ 100 Page 5 ANNUAL MAYOR SALARY ANNUAL COUNCIL SALARY 2005 2004 2003 2005 2004 2003 6,825 6,825 6,825 5,800 5,800 5,800 9,000 * * 7,800 3,300 * 3,000 5,040 5,040 5,040 4,020 4,020 4,020 6,500 6,500 * 5,500 5,500 6,000 6,000 6,000 4,900 4,900 4,900 8,400 8,400 8,400 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 4,600 4,600 4,600 6,090 5,912 4,872 4,730 5,700 * 4,200 6,300 6,300 * 5,700 5,700 6,400 6,400 6,400 5,200 5,200 5,200 6,300 6,300 6,300 5,100 5,100 5,100 8,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 4,500 4,500 9,808 9,522 9,290. 7,823 7,595 7,410 5,500 * 4,800 9,000 9,000 9,000 7,200 7,200 7,200 6,600 * * 5,400 8,100 7,875 7,875 6,500 6,300 6,300 Page 6 CITIES WITH POPULP.. jN OVER 20,000 REG. SPECIAL ANNUAL MAYOR SALARY ANNUAL COUNCIL SALARY 2000 CENSUS MTG./ MTG. MUNICIPALITY POPULATION MONTH PAY 2005 2004 2003 2005 2004 2003 Andover 28,939 2 1 9,500 9,500 9,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 Apple Valley _ 48,418 2 na 10,020 9,780 9,780 7,164 6,984 6,984 Blaine 49,962 2reg +3 /wrk 0 12,792 * * 9,384 Bloomington 85,301 3 HRA/50 Port Auth /35 18,700 18,700 18,700 11,700 11,700 11,700 Brooklyn Center 29,174 2 0 10,522. 10,522 10,166 8,056 8,056 7,784 Brooklyn Park 68,715 3 0 16,116 16,116 15,804 10,740 10,740 10,524 Burnsville 61,355 4 0 11,268 11,268 10,920 7,932 7,932 7,680 Champlin 22,925 2 0 9,550 9,550 9,550 6,610 6,610 6,610 Chanhassen 21,600 2 50 6,000 6,000 6,000 4,800 4,800 4,800 Chaska 20,260 2 -3 0 5,700 * 4,560 Coon Rapids 62,295 2 0 14,000 12,800 12,800 10,500 ** 9,600 ** 9,600 ** Cottage Grove 31,437 2 30 7,800 * 6,000 Crystal 23,012 2 +work 0 9,410 9,136 8,870 7,239 7,028 6,823 Eagan 64,975 2 +1 -2 special 0 9,500 * * 6,880 Eden Prairie 59,325 2 35 9,900 7,200 7,200 7,200 6,000 6,000 Edina 48,156 2 0 7,050 * * 5,100 Fridley 27,480 2 0 9,830 * 7138.18 * ** Golden Valley 20,736 2 +/3 max 50 11,619 11,619 10,910 8,696 8,696 8,165 Inver Grove Heights 31,053 2+ 0 8,300 7,500 7,500 6,500 6,000 6,000 Lakeville 47,523 2 0 9,996 9,996 9,996 8,664 8,664 8,664 Maple Grove 55,278 2 0 12,000 12,000 11,500 10,100 10,100 9,600 Page 6 * *Coon Rapids Council at large earns $12,250 annually. * * *Fridley's Councilmember at large earns $8,074 annually. * ** St. Louis Park Councilmembers also receive $3,819 per year for serving as members of the EDA, with president of the EDA receiving $5,092 per year. Page 7 CITIES WITH POPUL.-..,ON OVER 20,000 REG. SPECIAL ANNUAL MAYOR SALARY ANNUAL COUNCIL SALARY 2000 CENSUS MTG.1 MTG. MUNICIPALITY POPULATION MONTH PAY 2005 2004 2003 2005 2004 2003 Maplewood 35,763 2 0 10,983 10,983 10,561 9,666 9,666 9,294 Minneapolis 382,295 2 0 92,376 89,733 70,312 68,331 Minnetonka 51,658 2reg+ 1 study 0 10,500 10,500 9,600 8,000 8,000 7,200 New Brighton 22,332 2 0 8,600 * 8,600 7,000 * 7,000 New Hope 20,910 2 25 /EDA 10,672 10,672 10,672 7,553 7,553 7,552 Oakdale 27,605 1 0 6,000 7,200 6,000 5,820 5,820 5,820 Plymouth 70,238 2+ 1 -2 special 0 12,588 11,952 11,952 9,120 8,652 8,652 Richfield 34,502 2 0 9,042 8,779 8,523 7,019 6,815 6,616 Roseville 34,080 3 0 9,300 9,300 9,300 7,020 7,020 7,000 St. Louis Park 44,896 4 * * *' 9,760 9,760 9,760 6,365 6,365 6,365 St. Paul 287,604 4 0 96,887 1 * 43,443 Savage 23,570 3+ 0 8,000 7,200 7,200 6,000 5,400 5,400 Shakopee 24,967 2 0 6,756 6,756 6,756 5,628 5,628 5,628 Shoreview 26,475 1/ /reg 0 8,376 8,208 * 6,204 6,084 South St. Paul 20,304 2 na 10,200 10,200 10,200 6,600 6,600 6,600 White Bear Lake 24,909 2 0 7,680 7,680 * 5,400 5,400 Woodbury 49,329 2/reg 1/work 0 8,016 7,788 7,788 6,180 6,000 6,000 * *Coon Rapids Council at large earns $12,250 annually. * * *Fridley's Councilmember at large earns $8,074 annually. * ** St. Louis Park Councilmembers also receive $3,819 per year for serving as members of the EDA, with president of the EDA receiving $5,092 per year. Page 7