Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-08-16_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 16, 2005 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of August 2, 2005 II. HRA RESOLUTION 2005 -2 - BOND SALE - $5,425,000 HRA Public Project Revenue Bonds III. RESOLUTION 2005 -70 - BOND SALE - $1,460,000 General Obligation Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Bonds - Series 2005E IV. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL Minnesota Recreation and Park Association Award of Excellence for Passport to Play - -)gnition of Fire Department Personnel for Confined Space Rescue I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Special Meetings of July 5, 2005, July 19, 2005, August 2, 2005, and Regular Meeting of August 2, 2005 II. PUBLIC HEARINGS ON VACATIONS OF STREET OR UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. If Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution 3/5 favorable rollcall of Council Members required to pass. Rollcall A. VACATION OF PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT - 5532 Vernon Avenue III. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Zoning Ordinances: First Reading requires affirmative rollcall votes of three Council members except that a rezoning from residential to non - residential requires four affirmative votes. Second Reading requires affirmative rollcall votes of three of Council to pass except rezoning from residential to non - residential requires four affirmative votes. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall votes of four members of Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council members required passing. Conditional Use Permit: Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council members required to pass. Variance Appeal: Favorable rollcall of Council Members present to uphold or deny appeal Rollcall A. PRELIMINARY REZONING PRELIMINARY PLAT AMENDMENT TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - Riverview Commercial Properties - 501h Street & Indianola Avenue B. SET HEARING DATE - 9/6/05 - Appeal of Decision of Zoning Board of Appeals for Accredited Investors, Inc. - 5200 West 73rd Street Agenda /Edina City Council August 16, 2005 Page 2 IV. ORDINANCES - First Reading: Requires offering, of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of three Council members to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative vote of four Council members to pass. Rollcall A. FIRST READING - Ordinance No. 2005 -8 - 'Edina Art Center Board V. AWARD OF BID A. Schaefer Circle Roadway and Utility Improvements - Contract No. ENG. 05-12 * B. West 58th Street Roadway and Utility Improvements - Contract No. ENG. 05-8 * C. Roof Replacement - Treatment Plant No. 1 ' VI. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATI NS A. Noodles & Company - New Wine and On -Sale 3.2 Beer Licenses B. Todd Park Hockey Rink, Park Board Recommendation C. Special Assessment Policy * D. Resolution No. 2005 -69 Nominating Robert'j. Kojetin for Re- appointment to the Nine Mile Creek Watershed Board * E. Facility Garbage and Recycling Contract * F. Traffic Safety Staff Review of August 2, 2005 VII. FINANCE * A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per Pre -List dated August 2, 2005, TOTAL $304,027.33; and August 10, 2005, TOTAL $763,133.61. VIII. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS ' A. Receive Petition from Residents Requesting Curb and Gutter on Schaefer Circle Between Schaefer Road and end of cul -de -sac IX. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS X. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES M. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL XII. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEM SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS Mon Sept 5 LABOR DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Office Closed Tues Sept 6 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Oct 4 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Oct 18 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERr Tues Nov 1 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL_ CHAMBERS Tue Nov 8 GENERAL ELECTION DAY - POLLS OPEN FROM 7.A.M. TILL 8 P.M. Fri Nov 11 VETERAN'S DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Office Closed Tues Nov 15 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thur Nov 24 THANKSGIVING DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Office Closed Fri Nov 25 DAY AFTER THANKSGIVING DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Office Closed MINUTES OF tHE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL AUGUST 2, 2005 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson and Chair Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Housh and seconded by Commissioner Swenson approving the Consent Agenda for the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR JULY 19, 2005, APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Housh and seconded by Commissioner Swenson approving the Minutes of the regular meeting off the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for July 19, 2005. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. RESOLUTION NO. HRA 2005 -1 APPROVED — CALL for SALE OF PUBLIC PROJECT REVENUE BONDS — SERIES 2005 Director Hughes presented a pre -sale report for the sale of $5,425,000 in H.R.A.Public Project Revenue bonds. Proceeds of the bonds (at $5,200,000) will pay for the construction of the two gymnasiums to be located on the Community Center and Southview campuses. The term of the bonds will be 20 years. The bonds will be annual appropriation bonds requiring the Council establish a tax levy to pay the debt service on an annual basis. The Council will establish this levy with its annual budget levy at the first meeting in September. The projected levy will assume a net interest cost of 4.45% and will require an amount estimated to be around $410,000 on an annual basis. Because these will be annual appropriation bonds, the investment grade of the bonds drop one grade. Instead of being rated Aaa, the bonds will be rated Aa due to the risk to the bondholders of an annual appropriation. This type of bond was the identical type that was used for the construction the City Hall/Police facility. Commissioner Housh introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: HRA RESOLUTION NO. 2005-1 Resolution Providing for the Sale of $5,425,000 HRA Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2005 A. WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority for the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA"), has heretofore determined that it is necessary and expedient to issue the HRA's $5,425,000 Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2005 (the "Bonds "), to finance public improvements in the City; and Minutes/Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority /August 2, 2005 B. WHEREAS, the HRA has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc., in Roseville, Minnesota ( "Ehlers "), as its independent financial advisor for the Bonds and is therefore authorized to solicit proposals in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2(9); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Authorization; Findings. The HRA hereby authorizes Ehlers to solicit proposals for the sale of the Bonds. 2. Meeting; Proposal Opening. The HRA shall meet at 7:00 p.m. on August 16, 2005, for the purpose of considering sealed proposals for and awarding the sale of the Bonds. 3. Official Statement. In connection with said sale, the officers or employees of the HRA are hereby authorized to cooperate with Ehlers and participate in the preparation of an official statement for the Bonds and to execute and deliver it on behalf of the HRA upon its completion. ADOPTED this 2nd day of August, 2005. Commissioner Hulbert seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR HAUGLAND DEVELOPMENT APPROVED; SET HEARING DATE OF SEPTEMBER 6, 2005 FOR TRANSFER OF H.R.A. PROPERTY FOR HAUGLAND DEVELOPMENT Director Hughes indicated on May 3, 2005, the Council approved a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for the redevelopment proposal of the Haugland Companies at 50th & France. The approval was granted conditioned upon "platting the property to incorporate all easements, vacations and dedications." Mr. Hughes said in order for this project to proceed in a logical fashion and allow the Haugland Company to secure construction financing, the HRA and the City need to take a number of actions prior to the approval of the final plat which will likely occur following the substantial completion of the project. This would be due largely to the fact that the plat will be "three dimensional" in nature in order to legally separate the condominium floors and garage from the retail level. Mr. Hughes said that accurate legal descriptions cannot be prepared until the building is in place. Upon review by the City attorneys, staff recommended the HRA and the City grant Haugland a license for construction activities on the alleyway that occupies the northerly part of the Arby's site. Mr. Hughes added the HRA should set a hearing date for September 6, 2005, for the purpose of conveying this alleyway to Haugland conditioned upon Haugland rededicating an alley easement back to the City upon completion. Mr. Hughes added that State law required a hearing prior to disposition of property by the HRA. The alley was acquired approximately 25 years ago. The HRA's ownership was three dimensional in nature in that the underlying property owner retained ownership of air rights above the alley. The conveyance of the alley to Haugland and Haugland's subsequent rededication of an alley easement back to the City will result in the City owning the same (although slightly reconfigured) alleyway as the HRA now owns. Staff recommends the City set Minutes/Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority /August 2, 2005 a hearing date as well for September 6, 2005 to vacate various easements on the property. New easements will be rededicated to the City when the final plat is completed. Mr. Hughes displayed a graphic depicting the, area and requested HRA action in granting Haugland Development a Temporary Construction License for construction and set a hearing date for transfer of HRA property and vacation of easements. Commissioner Housh inquired what would be the scenario if the transfer did not happen because of the project not being completed. Attorney Gilligan stated that the easement over the area would not be designated until the plat was approved which would include rights protecting the City. He added that during the licensing period there were limits in place limiting the type of activities that can take place. Commissioner Swenson made a motion approving 'issuance of a Temporary Construction License Agreement to Haugland Development, setting September 6, 2005, as bearing date for the Transfer of HRA Property. Commissioner Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda, Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned. Executive Director To: II From:. II Date: REPORURECOMMENDATION MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item HRA II. ERIC ANDERSON Consent ❑. ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER Information Only ❑ AUGUST 16, 2005 Mgr. Recommends ® To HRA To Council Subject: $5,425,000 HRA PUBLIC VN Motion PROJECT REVENUE BONDS ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ° ❑ Discussion RECOMMENDATION: Approve resolutions awarding sale of HRA Bonds Series 2005A and authorizing the lease agreement. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND : As per the pre -sale report submitted to Council last meeting, the attached Resolutions need to be approved to award the sale of the bonds and authorize the lease agreement. The purpose of the bonds is to fund the construction of two Gymnasiums on the Community Center campus. The bonds will be paid by a taxable debt levy to be certified annually during the City's budget process. Estimated annual debt service on the bonds is $410,000. The award of the sale is an HRA resolution and the authorization of the lease agreement is a City action. A representative from Ehlers and Associates will be at the Council meeting to present the results of the bond sale. HRA RESOLUTION 2005 -2 RESOLUTION RELATING TO PUBLIC PROJECT REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2005 (CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL APPROPRIATION LEASE OBLIGATIONS); AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE, AWARDING SALE, PRESCRIBING THE FORM AND DETAILS AND PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT THEREOF BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "Authority"), as follows: Section L AUTHORIZATION AND SALE. 1.01. Authorization. The City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City ") desires to provide adequate City Hall and public safety facilities and has determined that the most efficient way to do so is to lease - purchase the facilities pursuant to the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.65. Acting pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.012, subdivision 1(7), the Authority would have the power to acquire real property, by lease or otherwise, and construct the proposed facilities for lease to the City. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.033, and Chapter 475, the Authority would further have the power to issue revenue bonds to provide the funds necessary for the acquisition, construction, remodeling, renovation and furnishing of the facilities. Pursuant to the foregoing authority, the Authority proposes to undertake the acquisition, construction and furnishing of two gymnasiums as more fully described in the plans and specifications therefor (herein the "Facilities ") and to finance the cost thereof by the issuance of its revenue bonds (the `Bonds ") under this Resolution and a Trust Indenture, to be dated as of August 1, 2005 (the "Indenture "), between the City and U.S. Bank National Association, in St. Paul, Minnesota, as trustee (the "Trustee "). The Facilities will be located on land ground leased by Independent School District No. 273 (Edina) to the Authority pursuant to a Ground Lease, to be dated as of August .1, 2005 (the "Ground Lease "). The Authority proposes to lease the Facilities to the City pursuant to a Lease Agreement, to be dated as of August 1, 2005 (the "Lease "), between the Authority, as lessor, and the City, as lessee. All bonds issued under this Resolution and the Indenture will be secured solely by rental payments to be made by the City pursuant to the Lease, and funds held by the Trustee under the Indenture, and said bonds and the interest on said bonds shall be payable solely from the revenue pledged therefor under the Indenture and no such bonds shall constitute a debt of the Authority or the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation nor shall constitute nor give rise to a pecuniary liability of the Authority or City or a charge against their general credit or taxing powers and shall not constitute a charge, lien, or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the Authority or City, other than the revenues pledged to the payment of the bonds under the Indenture. Under the Lease, and subject to the right of termination by the City at the end of each fiscal year of the City as provided in the Lease, the City is to pay to the Authority sufficient money each year to pay the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds issued under this Resolution and the Indenture, and the City is to provide the cost of maintaining the Facilities in good repair, the cost of keeping the Facilities properly insured, and any payments required for taxes and any expenses incurred by the Authority in connection with the Facilities. 1.02. Sale of Bonds. Pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, subdivision 2(9), the public sale requirements do not apply to the sale of the Bonds since the Authority has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc. as independent financial advisors. The Board has received an offer from in , , and associates (the Purchaser), to purchase the Bonds at a price of $ plus accrued interest on all Bonds to the day of delivery and payment, on the further terms and conditions hereinafter set forth and set forth in the Indenture. The offer is hereby accepted, and the Chair and the Secretary are hereby authorized and directed to execute a contract on the part of the Authority for the sale of the Bonds with the Purchaser. Section 2. BOND TERMS. EXECUTION AND DELIVERY. 2.01. Issuance of Bonds. For the purpose of paying the costs of the acquisition, construction and furnishing of the Facilities, this Board hereby authorizes the issuance of the Bonds in the aggregate principal amount of $5,425,000. All acts, conditions and things which are required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed precedent to and in the valid issuance of the Bonds having been done, existing, having happened and having been performed, it is now necessary for this Board to establish the form and terms of the Bonds, to provide security therefor and to. issue the Bonds forthwith. 2.02. Terms of the Bonds. The Bonds shall be designated "Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2005 (City of Edina Annual Appropriation Lease Obligations "). The terms of the Bonds, including without limitation, the date of original issue, interest payment dates, maturity dates and principal amounts, interest rates, redemption provisions, and provisions for registration and exchange shall be as set forth in. Articles H and III of the Indenture which are, incorporated herein by reference. 2.03. Execution Authentication and Delivery. The Bonds shall be executed by the Authority, and authenticated and delivered by the Trustee, in accordance with the applicable provisions of Article II of the Indenture which are incorporated herein by reference. 2.04. Form of Bonds. The Bonds shall be printed in substantially the form set forth in Section 2.01 of the Indenture. SECTION 3. APPROVAL OF GROUND LEASE, LEASE AGREEMENT; INDENTURE. The form of the. Ground Lease, and the form of the Lease Agreement and the Indenture, are hereby approved. The Chair and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver. said documents in the name and on behalf of the Authority with such variations, omissions and insertions as the Chair and Secretary shall approve, which approval shall be conclusively presumed by the execution and delivery of said documents by the Chair and Secretary. SECTION 4. REGISTRATION OF BONDS. The Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the County Auditor of Hennepin County, 2 together with such additional information as required, and to obtain from the County Auditor a certificate that the Bonds have been duly entered upon the County Auditor's bond register. SECTION 5. AUTHENTICATION OF TRANSCRIPT. The officers of the Authority are hereby authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the Purchaser, and to Dorsey & Whitney LLP, the attorneys rendering an opinion as to the legality thereof, certified copies of all proceedings and records relating to the Bonds and such other affidavits, certificates and information as may be required to show the facts relating to the legality and marketability of the Bonds, as the same appear from the books and records in their custody and control or as otherwise known to them, and all such certified copies, affidavits and certificates, including any heretofore furnished, shall be deemed representations of the Authority as to the correctness of all statements contained therein. SECTION 6. OFFICIAL STATEMENT. An Official Statement relating to the Bonds, prepared and delivered on behalf of the Authority by Ehlers & Associates, Inc., has been received and is hereby approved. Ehlers & Associates, Inc. is hereby authorized on behalf of the Authority to prepare and distribute to the Purchaser a supplement to the Official Statement listing the offering price, the interest rates, selling compensation, delivery date, the underwriters and such other information relating to the Bonds required to be included in the Official Statement by Rule 15c2 -12 adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of 1934. Within seven business days from the date hereof, the Authority shall deliver to the Purchaser sufficient copies of the Official Statement and such supplement. The officers of the Authority are hereby authorized and directed to execute such certificates as may be appropriate concerning the accuracy, completeness and sufficiency thereof. Section 7. TAX MATTERS. 7.01. General Tax Covenant. The Authority agrees with the Holders from time to time of the Bonds that it will not take, or permit to be taken by any of its officers, employees or agents, any action that would cause interest on the Bonds to become includable in gross income of the recipient under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code ") and applicable Treasury Regulations (the "Regulations "), and agrees to take any and all actions within its powers to ensure that the interest on the Bonds will not become includable in gross income of the recipient under the Code and the Regulations. All proceeds of the Bonds deposited in the Construction Fund established pursuant to the Indenture will be expended solely for the payment of the costs of acquisition, remodeling, renovation and furnishing of the Facilities as set forth in the Indenture. So long as any Bonds are outstanding, the Authority shall not enter into any contract for the sale of all or a portion of the Facilities or enter into any lease, management contract, use agreement or other agreement with any non - governmental person relating to the use of all or a portion of the Facilities or security for the payment of the Bonds which might cause the Bonds to be considered "private activity bonds" or "private loan bonds" pursuant to Section 141 of the Code. 7.02. Certification. The Chair and Secretary, being the officers of the Authority charged with the responsibility for issuing the Bonds pursuant to this Resolution, are authorized and directed to execute and deliver to the Purchaser a certificate in accordance with Section 148 of the Code, and applicable Regulations, stating the facts, estimates and circumstances in existence on the date of issue and delivery of the Bonds which make it reasonable to expect that the 3 proceeds of the Bonds will not be used in a manner that would cause the Bonds to be "arbitrage bonds" within the meaning of the Code and Regulations. 7.03. Arbitrage'Rebate. The Authority acknowledges that the Bonds are subject to the rebate requirements of Section 148(f) of the Code. The Authority covenants and agrees to retain such records, make such determinations, file such reports and documents and pay such amounts at such times as are required under said Section 148(f) and applicable Regulations to preserve the exclusion of interest on theBonds from gross income for federal income tax purposes. 7.04. Reimbursement. The Authority certifies that the proceeds of the Bonds will not be used by the Authority to reimburse itself for any expenditure with respect to the Facilities which the Authority paid or will have paid more than 60 days prior to the issuance of the Bonds unless, with respect to such prior expenditures, the Authority shall have made a declaration of official intent which complies with the provisions of Section 1.150 -2 of the Regulations; provided that this certification shall not apply (i) with respect to. certain de minimis expenditures, if any, with respect to the Facilities meeting the requirements of Section 1.150- 2(f)(1) of the Regulations, or (ii) with respect to "preliminary expenditures" for the City Hall and Public Safety Facility as defined in Section 1.150- 2'(f)(2) of the Regulations, including engineering or architectural expenses and similar preparatory expenses, which in the aggregate do not exceed 20% of the "issue price" of the Bonds. 7.05. Interest Disallowance.. The authority hereby designates the Bonds as "qualified tax- exempt obligations" for purpose of Section 265(b) of the Code relating to the disallowance of interest expenses for financial institutions. The Authority represents that in calendar year 2005 it does not reasonable expect to issue tax- exempt obligations which are not private activity bonds (not treating qualified 501(c)(3) bonds under Section 145 of the Code as private activity bonds for purposes of this representation) in an amount in excess of $10,000,000. ATTEST: Executive Director STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS CERTIFICATE Chair I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting Executive Director for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution'was duly adopted by the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority at its Regular Meeting of August 16, 2005, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20 Executive Director 4 RESOLUTION NO. 2005-71 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A LEASE AGREEMENT PROVIDING FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF GYMNASIUMS AND THE LEASE THEREOF BY THE CITY, AND APPROVING THE FORM OF A RESOLUTION AND AN OFFICIAL STATEMENT WHEREAS, the City of Edina (the "City ") desires to provide adequate facilities for maintenance and public safety; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 465.71 and 471.64, the City is authorized to enter into leases of real property, with an option to purchase, provided that the City retains the right to cancel said lease - purchase contract at the end of any fiscal year during its term; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said statutory authority, the City proposes to enter into a Lease Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2005 (the "Lease "), with the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "Authority"), as lessor, and the City, as lessee, pursuant to which the Authority will acquire, construct and furnish two gymnasiums (the "Facilities "), and the City will lease the Facilities from the Authority; and, WHEREAS, the Authority (a) authorized the sale of its $5,425,000 Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2005 (City of Edina Annual Appropriation Lease Obligations) (the "Bonds "), to finance the cost of acquiring, remodeling, renovating and furnishing the Facilities pursuant to action of the Board of Commissioners of the Authority on August 2, 2005 and (b) proposes to adopt a final resolution awarding the sale of the Bonds on August 16, 2005 (the "Bond Resolution); WHEREAS, a form of the Lease and the Bond Resolution have been submitted to and reviewed by this Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that the City hereby approves the form of the Lease and the Mayor and City Manager are authorized and directed to execute, attest and deliver the Lease on behalf of the City. All of the provisions of the Lease, when executed and delivered as authorized herein, shall be deemed to be a part of this resolution as fully and to the same extent as if incorporated verbatim herein and shall be in full force and effect from the date of execution and delivery thereof. The Lease shall be substantially in the form submitted to this Council with such necessary and appropriate variations, omissions and insertions as permitted or required, or as the Mayor, in his discretion, shall determine, and the execution thereof by the Mayor shall be conclusive evidence of such determination. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby approves the form of the Official Statement, relating to the Bonds (the "Official Statement "), a draft of which has been submitted to and received by this Council, and hereby ratifies and confirms its use and distribution to potential purchasers of the Bonds. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED. that the. -City hereby approves the terms of the Bond Resolution and the sale of the Bonds pursuant thereto, and approves the terms of the Bonds as set forth in said Bond Resolution and the Indenture (as defined in the Bond Resolution). BE IT. FURTHER RESOLVED AS. FOLLOWS: Continuing Disclosure: (a) Purpose and Beneficiaries. To provide for the public availability of certain information relating to the Bonds and the security therefor and to permit the Purchaser and other participating underwriters in the primary offering of the Bonds to comply with amendments to Rule 15c2 -12 promulgated by the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 C.F.R. § 240.15c2 -12), relating to continuing disclosure (as in effect and interpreted from time to. time, the Rule), which will enhance the marketability of the Bonds, the City hereby makes the following covenants and agreements for the benefit of the Owners (as hereinafter defined) from time to time of the Outstanding Bonds. The City is the only obligated person in respect of the Bonds within the meaning of the Rule for purposes of identifying the entities in respect of which continuing disclosure must be made. The City has complied in all material respects with any undertaking previously entered into by it under the Rule. If the City fails to comply with any provisions of this section, any person aggrieved thereby, including the Owners of any Outstanding Bonds, may take whatever action at law or in equity may appear necessary or appropriate to enforce performance and observance of any agreement or covenant contained in this section, including an action for a writ of mandamus or specific performance. Direct, indirect, consequential and punitive damages shall not be recoverable for any default hereunder to the extent permitted by law.. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, in no event shall a default under this section constitute a default under the Bonds or. under any other provision of this resolution. As used in this section, Owner or Bondowner means, in respect of a Bond, the registered owner or owners thereof appearing in the bond register maintained by the Registrar or any Beneficial Owner (as hereinafter defined) thereof, if such Beneficial Owner provides to the Registrar evidence of such beneficial ownership in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Registrar. As used herein, Beneficial Owner means, in respect of a Bond, any person or entity which (i) has the power, directly or indirectly, to vote or consent with respect to, or to dispose of ownership. of, such Bond (including persons or entities holding Bonds through nominees, depositories or other intermediaries), or (b) is treated as the owner of the Bond for federal income tax purposes. (b) Information To Be Disclosed. The City will provide, in the manner set forth in subsection (c) hereof,. either directly or indirectly through an agent designated by the City, the following information at the following times: (1) on or before 365 days. after the end of each fiscal year of the City, commencing with the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005, the following financial information and operating data in respect of the City (the Disclosure Information): -2- (A) the audited financial statements of the City for such fiscal year, containing balance sheets as of the .end of such fiscal year and a statement of operations, changes in fund balances and cash flows for the fiscal year then ended, showing in comparative form such figures for the preceding fiscal year of the City, prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles promulgated by the Financial Accounting Standards Board as modified in accordance with the governmental accounting standards promulgated by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board or as otherwise provided under Minnesota law, as in effect from time to time, or, if and to the extent such financial statements have not been prepared in accordance with such generally accepted accounting principles for reasons beyond the reasonable control of the City, noting the discrepancies therefrom and the effect thereof, and certified as to accuracy and completeness in all material respects by the fiscal officer of the City; and (B) To the extent not included in the financial statements referred to in paragraph (A) hereof, the information for such fiscal year or for the period most recently available of'the type contained in the Official Statement under headings: General Obligation Issues, Current Property Valuations, Direct Debt, Tax Levies and Collections, Population Trend and Employment/Unemployment. Notwithstanding the foregoing paragraph, if the audited financial statements are not available by the date specified, the City shall provide on or before such date unaudited financial statements in the format required for the audited financial statements as part of the Disclosure Information and, within 10 days after the receipt thereof, the City shall provide the audited financial statements. Any or all of the Disclosure Information may be incorporated by reference, if it is updated as required hereby, from other documents, including official statements, which have been submitted to each of the repositories hereinafter referred to under subsection (c) or the SEC. If the document incorporated by reference is a final official statement, it must be available from the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. The City shall clearly identify in the Disclosure Information each document so incorporated by reference. If any part of the Disclosure Information can no longer be generated because the operations of the City have materially changed or been discontinued, such Disclosure Information need no longer be provided if the City includes in the Disclosure Information a statement to such effect; provided, however, if such operations have been replaced by other City operations in respect of which data is not included in the Disclosure Information and the City determines that certain specified data regarding such replacement operations would be a Material Fact (as defined in paragraph (2) hereof), then, from and after such determination, the Disclosure Information shall include such additional specified data regarding the replacement operations. If the Disclosure Information_ is changed or this section is amended as permitted by this paragraph (b)(1) or subsection (d), then the City shall include in the next Disclosure Information to be delivered hereunder, to the extent necessary, an explanation of the reasons for the amendment and the effect of any change in the type of financial information or operating data provided. -3- (2) In a timely manner, notice. of the occurrence of any of the following events which is a Material Fact (as hereinafter defined): (A) Principal and interest payment delinquencies; (B) Non - payment related defaults; (C) Unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial difficulties; (D) Unscheduled draws -on credit enhancements reflecting financial difficulties; (E) Substitution of credit or liquidity providers, or their failure to perform; (F) Adverse tax opinions or events affecting the tax - exempt status of the security; (G) Modifications to rights of security holders; (H) Bond calls; (I) Defeasances; (J) Release, substitution, or sale of property securing repayment of the securities; and (K) Rating changes. As used herein, a Material Fact is a fact as to which a substantial likelihood exists that a reasonably prudent investor would attach importance thereto in deciding to buy, hold or. sell a Bond or, if not disclosed, would significantly alter the total information otherwise available to an investor from the Official Statement, information disclosed hereunder or information generally available to the public. Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, a Material Fact is also an event that would be deemed material for purposes of the purchase, holding or sale of a Bond within the meaning of applicable federal securities laws, as interpreted at the time of discovery of the occurrence of the event. (3) In a timely manner, notice of the occurrence of any of the following events or conditions: (A) the failure of the City to provide the Disclosure Information required under paragraph (b)(1) at the time specified thereunder; (B) the amendment or. supplementing of this section pursuant to subsection (d), together with a copy of such amendment or supplement and any explanation provided by the City under subsection (d)(2); (C) the termination of the obligations of the City under this section pursuant to subsection (d); (D) any change in the accounting principles pursuant to which the financial statements constituting a portion of the Disclosure Information are prepared; and (E) any change in the fiscal year of the City. -4- (c) Manner of Disclosure. The City agrees to make available the information described in subsection (b) to the following entities by telecopy, overnight delivery, mail or other means, as appropriate: (1) the information described in paragraph (1) of subsection (b), to each then. nationally recognized municipal securities information repository under the Rule and to any state information depository then designated or operated by the State of Minnesota as contemplated by the Rule (the State Depository), if any; (2) the information described in paragraphs (2) and (3) of subsection (b), to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board and to the State Depository, if any; and (3) the information described in subsection (b), to any rating agency then maintaining a rating of the Bonds at the request of the City and, at the expense of such Bondowner, to any Bondowner who requests in writing such information, at the time of transmission under paragraphs (1) or (2) of this subsection (c), as the case may be, or, if such information is transmitted with a subsequent time of release, at the time such information is to be released. (d) Term; Amendments; Interpretation. (1) The covenants of the City in this section shall remain in effect so long as any Bonds are Outstanding. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, however, the obligations of the City under this section shall terminate and be without further effect as of any date on which the City delivers to the Registrar an opinion of Bond Counsel to the effect that, because of legislative action or final judicial or administrative actions or proceedings, the failure of the City to comply with the requirements of this section will not cause participating underwriters in the primary offering of the Bonds to be in violation of the Rule or other applicable requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or any statutes or laws successory thereto or amendatory thereof. (2) This section (and the form and requirements of the Disclosure Information) may be amended or supplemented by the City from time to time, without notice to (except as provided in paragraph (c)(3) hereof) or the consent of the Owners of any Bonds, by a resolution of this Council filed in the office of the recording officer of the City accompanied by an opinion of Bond Counsel, who may rely on certificates of the City and others and the opinion may be subject to customary qualifications, to the effect that: (i) such amendment or supplement (a) is made in connection with a change in circumstances that arises from a change in law or regulation or a change in the identity, nature or status of the City or the type of operations conducted by the City, or (b) is required by, or better complies with, the provisions of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule; (ii) this section as so amended or supplemented would have complied with the requirements of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule at the time of the primary offering of the Bonds, giving effect to any change in circumstances applicable under clause (i)(a) and assuming that the Rule as in effect and interpreted at the time of the amendment or supplement was in -5- effect at the time of the primary offering; and (iii) such amendment or supplement does not materially impair the interests of the Bondowners under the Rule. If the Disclosure Information i's' so amended, the City agrees to provide, contemporaneously with the effectiveness of such amendment, an explanation of the reasons for the amendment and the effect, if any, of the change in the type of financial information or operating data being provided hereunder. . (3) This section is entered into. to comply with the continuing disclosure provisions of the Rule and should be construed' so as to satisfy the requirements of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that this resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and that a certified copy hereof be provided to the Authority. ATTEST: Executive Director STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF ED]NA ) CERTIFICATE Chair. I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting Executive Director for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority at its Regular Meeting of Augustl6, 2005, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of in , 20 Executive Director i i II REPORURECOMMENDATION To: - MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item III. From: ERIC ANDERSON Consent ❑ ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER Information Only ❑ Date: AUGUST 16, 2005 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: $1,460,000 G.O PUBLIC ® Motion IMPROVEMENT REVOLVING ❑ Resolution FUND BONDS - SERIES 2005E ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion RECOMMENDATION: Approve attached resolution awarding sale of Bonds Series 2005E. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND : As per the presale report submitted to the Council last meeting, the attached resolution needs to be approved to award the sale of G.O. Bonds Series 2005E. he purpose of this debt is to pay for construction costs related to assessable street costs for a number of projects that will be completed this year. Curb and gutter costs were not included in the principal amount of the bonds. The bonds will be paid through assessment payments that will be established after final assessment hearings on each of the projects. The term of the bonds is 10 years and the estimated interest rate is 3.9 %. This is a City Council action. A representative from Ehlers and Associates will be at the meeting to present the results of the sale. RESOLUTION NO. 2005-70 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE, AWARDING SALE, PRESCRIBING THE FORM AND DETAILS AND PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT OF $1,460,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION PERMANENT IMPROVEMENT REVOLVING FUND BONDS, SERIES 2005E BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City), as follows: SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT, AUTHORIZATION AND SALE. 1.01. Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Establishment. The City has, and will continue to have, a need for substantial improvements to its infrastructure and wishes to establish a system for the financing of those improvements on a consistent basis. Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.091, Subdivision 7a, authorizes the City to establish a revolving fund for the payment of the costs of any improvement described in Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.021, or any waterworks systems, sewer systems, or storm sewer systems described in Minnesota Statutes, Section 444.075, (all such improvements and systems being referred to herein as Improvements) and for the payment of any obligations issued to pay the costs of Improvements or to refund obligations issued for those purposes. This Council hereby creates a revolving fund as contemplated by Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.091, Subdivision 7a, to be designated as the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund (the Fund), which shall be maintained as a separate and special bookkeeping account on the official books of the City until all obligations have been fully paid, or the City's obligation with reference to such obligations has been discharged as provided in the resolutions under which such obligations were issued. Within the Fund, the following accounts are created: a Revenue Account and a Debt Service Account. This Council shall, from time to time as necessary, issue and sell general obligation bonds (the Obligations), to finance the cost of various Improvements (the Improvements financed by each series of Obligations are referred to herein as a Project), each series of Obligations to be issued pursuant to a resolution of this Council (the Resolution). No Obligations may be issued for a Project unless either (i) at least 20 percent of the costs of such Project is to be assessed against benefited property or (ii) the Council estimates that the costs will be recovered from the net revenues of the waterworks system, sewer system, or storm sewer system operated by the City, or a combination of net revenues and special assessments. Each series of the Obligations 1 shall be payable primarily from a Debt Service Fund 'established or designated in 'the Resolution and the, proceeds of each series of Obligations shall be used to defray in whole or in part any expenses incurred or , estimated to be incurred in making the Improvements,. including every item of cost of the kinds authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.65, or to refund Bonds previously issued under this Resolution or under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, or Sections 115.46 or 444.075. The Obligations shall be general obligations to which the full faith and credit of the City are pledged. If the special assessments to be levied and net revenues estimated to be available for their payment are estimated to be at least 20 'percent of the principal amount of the Obligations, the Obligations may be issued without an election and shall not be included in determining the net indebtedness of the City under the provisions of any law limiting net indebtedness. When all conditions exist precedent to the offering for sale of Obligations, this Council may issue and sell temporary Obligations not exceeding the total amount authorized, maturing in, not more than ,three years from the date the temporary Obligations are issued, in anticipation of the issuance of the Obligations. To the extent that the principal of and interest on the temporary bonds cannot be paid when due from other sources pledged or appropriated for the purpose, they shall be paid from the proceeds of permanent Obligations or additional temporary Obligations which this Council shall offer for sale in advance of their. maturity; but the indebtedness funded by an issue of temporary Obligations shall not be extended by the issue of additional temporary Obligations for more than six years from the date of the first issue. The holders of any temporary Obligations shall have and: may enforce, by mandamus or other appropriate proceedings, all rights respecting the levy and collection of taxes that are granted by law to holders of permanent Obligations, except the right to require the levies to be collected prior to the maturity of the temporary Obligations. If any temporary Obligations are not paid in. full at maturity, the holders may require the issuance in exchange for them, at par, of new temporary Obligations maturing within one year from their date of issue but not subject to any other maturity limitation, and bearing interest at the maximum rate permitted by law. This Council may by resolution adopted prior to the sale of any temporary Obligations pledge the full faith, credit, and taxing power of the City for the payment of the principal and interest, in addition to all provisions made for their security in the authorizing resolution. If it does so, the temporary Obligations will be designated as general obligation temporary Obligations, and this Council shall levy taxes for their payment in accordance with this section. The proceeds of any Obligations received by the City, exclusive of unused discount and accrued interest, shall be deposited in one or more Construction Funds (each a Construction Fund) created or designated in the Resolution and used to pay costs of the Projects or such other Improvements as the Council may designate, or in the case of refunding Obligations, the net proceeds shall be deposited either in an escrow account as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.67, or in the fund or account from which the refunded Obligations are payable. 2 A special subaccount shall be created within the Construction Fund for each Project, and Bond proceeds, Revenues any other revenues appropriated by the Resolution for that Project shall be held and accounted for therein. When a Project has been completed and its costs paid, or if the Council determines to abandon the Project, any amounts remaining in the subaccount for that Project shall be transferred to the Revenue Account in the Infrastructure Management Fund. All revenues, which shall include all (i) special assessments levied with respect to Improvements financed or refinanced through the Fund; (ii) utility revenues pledged or appropriated to the Fund with respect to Improvements financed or refinanced through the Fund, (iii) taxes levied with respect to any Obligations or Improvements financed or refinanced through the Fund; (iv) proceeds of any federal or state grants received with respect to, or appropriated for the purpose of, any Improvements financed or refinanced through the Fund; and (v) other moneys at any time pledged or appropriated by this Council for the purpose of the Fund, (the Revenues) are irrevocably pledged and appropriated and shall be credited to the Fund as received. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no taxes levied or amounts appropriated by this Council as a result of a deficiency in the Revenues for the payment of any Obligations (the Deficiency Amounts) shall be considered as part of the Revenues, and any Deficiency Amounts shall be deposited as received to the Debt Service Fund of the Obligations with respect to which such deficiency exists. The Revenue Account is established as a separate and special bookkeeping account within the Fund. All Revenues shall be deposited, as received, into the Revenue Account. On January 1 and July 1 in each year, commencing January 1, 2006, there shall be transferred from the Revenue Account to the Debt Service Account an amount sufficient, with amounts then on hand in the Debt Service Account, to pay the principal of and "interest on all Obligations due or to become due through the next succeeding June 30, in the case of a transfer made on any January 1 and December 31, in the case of a transfer made on July 1. If the balance on hand in the Revenue Account is not sufficient on any January 1 or July 1 to make the required transfer to the Debt Service Account in full, all Revenues thereafter received in the Revenue Account shall be immediately transferred to the Debt Service Account until the balance therein reaches the required level. So long as there is no deficiency in amounts required to be transferred to the Debt Service Account, amounts on hand in the Revenue Account may be transferred, as needed, to the subaccount for any Project within any Construction Fund. The Debt Service Account is established as a separate and special bookkeeping account within the Fund. On each January 1 or July 1, a transfer shall be made from the Revenue Account, and if the transfer from the Revenue Account is not sufficient, the Revenues thereafter received by the City shall be transferred, as received, to Debt Service Account until the balance on hand in the Debt Service Account equals the sum of (i) the principal and premium, if any, due on any Obligations on and before the next 3 succeeding June 30 or December 31 whether by reason of stated maturity or through operation of the mandatory redemption of any term Obligations under the Resolution, plus (ii) interest due on any Obligations on 'and before the next succeeding June 30 or December 31. If on any interest payment date there are not sufficient amounts on deposit in the Debt Service Account to pay the total amount of interest'and principal coming due on such interest payment date, the City shall transfer any moneys then on deposit to the credit of the Revenue Account, in an amount equal to such deficiency, to the Debt Service Account. There . are hereby established two accounts in the Debt Service Account, designated as the "Debt Service Subaccount" and the "Surplus Subaccount." During each Bond Year (i.e., each twelve month period commencing on February 2 and ending on the following February 1), as monies are received into the Debt Service Account, the Treasurer shall first deposit such monies into the Debt Service Subaccount until an amount has been appropriated thereto sufficient to pay all principal and interest due on the Obligations through the end of the Bond Year. All subsequent monies received in the Debt Service Subaccount during the Bond Year shall be appropriated to the Surplus Subaccount. If at any time the amount on hand in the Debt Service Subaccount is insufficient for the payment of principal and interest then due, the Treasurer shall transfer to the Debt Service Subaccount amounts on hand in the Surplus Subaccount to the extent necessary to cure such deficiency. Investment earnings (and losses) on amounts from time to time held in the Debt Service Subaccount and Surplus Subaccount shall be credited or charged to said accounts. On the business day preceding each date on which principal of or interest on any Obligations are to be paid by the City in accordance with the Resolution, the Clerk shall, without further direction by the Council, transfer from the Debt Service Account to the Debt Service Fund from which such Obligations are payable an amount sufficient to pay such principal and interest. If the aggregate balance in the Debt Service Account is at any time insufficient to pay when due all principal of and interest on all Obligations payable therefrom, the payment shall be made from any fund of the City which is available for that purpose, subject to reimbursement from the Revenue Account when the balance therein is sufficient, and this Council covenants and agrees that it will each year levy a sufficient amount of ad valorem taxes to take care of any accumulated or anticipated deficiency, which levy is not subject to any constitutional or. statutory limitation. All Obligation proceeds and Revenues on hand in the Fund shall be deposited or invested in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 118A. All securities so purchased shall mature at or before the time when it is estimated that the proceeds thereof will be needed for the purposes of the Account from which funds are withdrawn for the purchase. All income, gain and loss on such investments will be n credited or charged, as the case may be, to the Account from which the investment was made. When all of any outstanding Obligations have been discharged as provided in the Resolution, all pledges, covenants and other rights granted herein to the holders of any such Obligations shall cease. At that time the Council may determine to terminate the Fund, and may appropriate any moneys on hand therein for any other City purpose. 1.02. Authorization. - The City Council hereby determines that it is in the best interest of the City to issue its $1,460,000 General Obligation Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Bonds, Series 2005E (the Bonds), to finance from the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund the cost of various municipal improvements, including Halifax and Grimes, South Harriet Park West, Sunnyslope Neighborhood, Schaefer Road, West 58t" Street, Schaefer Circle, Bridge Lane and Shannon Drive (the Projects). 1.03. Sale. The City has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc., an independent financial advisor, to assist the City in connection with the sale of the Bonds. The interest on the Bonds will not be excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes. The Bonds are being sold pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2, paragraph (9), without meeting the requirements for public sale under Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 1. Pursuant to the Terms and Conditions of Sale for the Bonds, (_) proposals for the purchase of the Bonds were received at or before the time specified for receipt of proposals. The proposals have been publicly read and considered, and the purchase price, interest rates and net interest cost under the terms of each proposal have been determined. The most favorable proposal received is that of , of (the "Purchaser'), to purchase the Bonds at a price of $ the Bonds to bear interest at the rates set forth in Section 2.02. 1.04. Award. The sale of the Bonds is hereby .awarded to the Purchaser and the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the City to execute a contract for the sale of the Bonds in accordance with the terms of the proposal. The good faith deposit of the Purchaser shall be deposited by the City until the Bonds have been delivered and shall be deducted from the purchase price paid at settlement. SECTION 2. BOND TERMS; REGISTRATION; EXECUTION AND DELIVERY. 2.01. Issuance of Bonds. All acts, conditions and things which are required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed precedent to and in the valid issuance of the Bonds having been done, now existing, having happened and having been performed, it is now necessary for the City Council to establish the form and terms of the Bonds, to provide security therefor and to issue the Bonds forthwith. 5 2.02. Maturities; Interest Rates; Denominations and Payment. The Bonds shall be dated originally as of September 13, 2005, shall be in the denomination of $5,000 each, or any integral multiple thereof, of single maturities, shall mature on February 1 in the years and amounts stated below, and shall bear interest from date of original issue until paid or duly called for redemption at the respective-annual rates set forth opposite such years and amounts, as follows: Year Amount Rate Year Amount Rate 2007 $125,000 % 2012 $145,000 % 2008 130,000 2013 155,000 2009 135,000 2014 160,000 2010 135,000 2015 165,000 2011 140,000 2016 170,000 The Bonds shall be issuable only, in fully registered form. The interest thereon and, upon surrender of each Bond at the principal office of the Registrar described herein, the principal amount thereof shall be payable by check or draft issued by the Registrar described herein; provided that, so long as the Bonds are registered in the name of a securities depository, or a nominee thereof, in accordance with Section 2.08 hereof, principal and interest shall be payable in accordance with the operational arrangements of the securities depository. 2.03. Dates and Interest Payment -Dates. Upon initial delivery of the Bonds pursuant to Section 2.07 and upon any subsequent transfer or exchange pursuant to Section 2.06, the date of authentication shall be noted on each Bond so delivered, exchanged or transferred. Interest on the Bonds shall be payable on each February 1 and August 1, commencing February 1, 2006, each such date being referred to herein as an Interest Payment Date, to the person in whose names the Bonds are registered on the, Bond Register, as hereinafter defined, at the Registrar's close of business on the fifteenth day of the calendar month next preceding such Interest Payment Date, whether or not such day is a business day. Interest shall be computed on the basis of a 360 day year composed of twelve 30 day months. 2.04. Redemption. Bonds maturing in the years 2007 through 2012 are payable on their respective stated maturity dates without option of prior payment, but Bonds maturing in 2013 and thereafter are each subject to redemption, at the option of the Issuer and in whole or in part, and if in part, in the maturities selected by the City and, within any maturity, in $5,000 principal amounts selected by the Registrar by lot, on February 1, 2012 and on any date thereafter, at a redemption price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus accrued interest to the date of redemption. At least thirty days prior to the date set for redemption of any Bond, the Issuer shall cause notice of the call for redemption to be mailed to the Registrar and to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed, but no defect in or failure to give 0 such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of proceedings ' for the redemption of any Bond not affected by such defect or failure. The notice of redemption shall specify the redemption date, redemption price, the numbers, interest rates and CUSIP numbers of the Bonds to be redeemed and the place at which the Bonds are to be surrendered for payment, which is the principal office of the Registrar. Official notice of redemption having been given as aforesaid, the Bonds or portions thereof so to be redeemed shall, on the redemption date, become due and payable at the redemption price therein specified and from and after such date (unless the Issuer shall default in the payment of the redemption price) such Bonds or portions thereof shall cease to bear interest. Bonds in a denomination larger than $5,000 may be redeemed in part in any integral multiple of $5,000. The owner of any Bond redeemed in part shall receive without charge, upon surrender of such Bond to the Registrar, one or more new Bonds in authorized denominations equal in principal amount to be unredeemed portion of the Bond so surrendered. 2.05. Appointment of Initial Registrar. The City hereby appoints U.S. Bank National Association in St. Paul, Minnesota, as the initial Registrar. The Mayor and Finance Director are authorized to execute and deliver, on behalf of the City, a contract with U.S. Bank National Association, as Registrar. Upon merger or consolidation of the Registrar with another corporation, if the resulting corporation is a bank or trust company authorized by law to conduct such business, such corporation shall be authorized to act as successor Registrar. The City agrees to pay the reasonable and customary charges of the Registrar for the services performed. The City reserves the right to remove any Registrar upon thirty (30) days' notice and upon the appointment of a successor Registrar, in which event the predecessor Registrar shall deliver all cash and Bonds in its possession to the successor Registrar. On or before each principal or interest due date, without further order of this Council, the Finance Director shall transmit to the Registrar from the General Obligation Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Bonds, Series 2005E Debt Service Account described in Section 4 hereof, moneys sufficient for the payment of all principal and interest then due. 2.06. Registration. The effect of registration and the rights and duties of the City and the Registrar with respect thereto shall be as follows: (a) Register. The Registrar shall keep at its principal corporate trust office a bond register in which the Registrar shall provide for the registration of ownership of Bonds and the registration of transfers and exchanges of Bonds entitled to be registered, transferred or exchanged. (b) Transfer of Bonds. Upon surrender for transfer of any Bond duly endorsed by the registered owner thereof or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer, in form satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner thereof or by an attorney duly authorized by the registered 7 owner in writing, the .Registrar shall authenticate and deliver, in the name of the designated transferee or transferees, one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the transferor. The Registrar may, however, close the books for registration of any transfer after the fifteenth day of the month preceding each Interest Payment Date and until such Interest Payment Date. (c) Exchange of Bonds. Whenever any Bonds are surrendered by the registered owner for exchange the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the registered owner or the owner's attorney in writing. (d) Cancellation. All Bonds surrendered upon any transfer or exchange shall be promptly canceled by the Registrar and thereafter disposed of as directed by the City. (e) Improper or Unauthorized Transfer. When any Bond is presented to the Registrar for transfer; the Registrar may refuse to transfer the same until it is satisfied that the endorsement on such Bond or separate instrument of transfer is valid and genuine and that the requested transfer is legally authorized. The Registrar shall incur no liability for the refusal, in good faith, to make transfers which it, in its judgment, deems improper or unauthorized. (f) Persons Deemed Owners. The City and the Registrar may treat the person in whose name any Bond is at any time registered in the bond register as the absolute owner of such Bond, whether such Bond shall be overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment of, or on account of, the principal of and interest on such Bond and for all other purposes, and all such payments so made to any such registered owner or upon the owner's order shall be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability upon such Bond to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. (g) Taxes, Fees and Charges. For every transfer or exchange of Bonds (except for an exchange upon a partial redemption of a Bond), the Registrar may impose a charge upon the owner thereof sufficient to reimburse the Registrar for any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. (h) Mutilated, Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Bonds. In case any Bond shall become mutilated or be destroyed, stolen or lost, the Registrar shall deliver a new Bond of like amount, number, maturity date and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of any such mutilated Bond or in lieu of and in substitution for any such Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon the payment of the reasonable expenses and charges of the Registrar in connection therewith; and, in the. case of a Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon filing with the Registrar of evidence satisfactory to it that such Bond was destroyed, stolen or lost, and of the ownership thereof, and upon furnishing to the Registrar of an appropriate bond or indemnity in form, substance and amount satisfactory to it, in which both the City and the Registrar shall be named as obligees. All Bonds so surrendered to the Registrar shall be canceled by it and evidence of such cancellation shall be given to the City. If the mutilated, destroyed, stolen or lost Bond has already matured or been called for redemption in accordance with its terms it shall not be necessary to issue a new Bond prior to payment. (i) Authenticating_ Agent. The Registrar is hereby designated authenticating agent'for the Bonds, within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.55, Subdivision 1, as amended. (j) Valid Obligations. . All Bonds issued upon any transfer or exchange of Bonds shall be the valid obligations of the. City, evidencing the same debt, and entitled to the same benefits under this Resolution as the Bonds surrendered upon such transfer or exchange. 2.07. Execution, Authentication and Delivery. The Bonds shall be prepared under the direction of the City Finance Director and shall be executed on behalf of the City by the signatures of the Mayor and the City Manager, provided that all signatures may be printed, engraved or lithographed facsimiles of the originals. In case any officer whose signature or a facsimile of whose signature shall appear on the Bonds shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of any Bond, such signature or facsimile shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if he or she had remained in office until delivery. Notwithstanding such execution, no Bond shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under this Resolution unless and until a certificate of authentication on such Bond has been duly executed by the manual signature of an authorized representative of the Registrar. Certificates of authentication on different Bonds need not be signed by the same representative. The executed certificate of authentication on each Bond shall be conclusive evidence that it has been authenticated and delivered under this Resolution. When the Bonds have been so prepared, executed and authenticated, the City Finance Director shall deliver them to the Purchaser upon payment of the purchase price in accordance with the contract of sale heretofore made and executed, and the Purchaser shall not be obligated to see to the application of the purchase price. 2.08. Securities Depository. (a) For purposes of this Section the following terms shall have the following meanings: "Beneficial Owner" shall mean, whenever used with respect to a Bond, the person in whose name such Bond is recorded as the beneficial owner of such Bond by a Participant on the records of such Participant, or such person's subrogee. "Cede & Co." shall mean Cede & Co., the nominee of DTC, and any successor nominee of DTC with respect to the Bonds. X "DTC" shall mean The Depository Trust Company of New York, New York. "Participant" shall mean any broker - dealer, bank or other financial institution for which DTC holds Bonds as securities depository. "Representation Letter" shall mean the Representation Letter from the Issuer to DTC previously executed by the Issuer and on file with DTC. (b) The Bonds shall be initially issued as separately authenticated fully registered bonds, and one Bond shall be issued in the principal amount of each stated maturity of the Bonds. Upon initial issuance, the ownership of such Bonds shall be registered in the bond register in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC. The Registrar and the Issuer may treat DTC (or its nominee) as the sole and exclusive owner of the Bonds registered in its name for the purposes of payment of the principal of or interest on the Bonds, selecting the Bonds or portions thereof to be redeemed, if any, giving any notice permitted or required to be given to registered owners of Bonds under this resolution, registering the transfer of Bonds, and for all other purposes whatsoever; and neither the Registrar nor the Issuer shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. Neither the Registrar nor the Issuer shall have any responsibility or obligation to any Participant, any person claiming a beneficial ownership interest in the Bonds under or through DTC or any Participant, or any other person which is not shown on the bond register as being a registered owner of any Bonds, with respect to the accuracy of any records maintained by DTC or any Participant, with respect to the payment by DTC or any Participant of any amount with respect to the principal of or interest on the Bonds, with respect to any notice which is permitted or required to be given to owners of Bonds under this resolution, with respect to the selection by DTC or any Participant of any person to receive payment in the event of a partial redemption of the Bonds, or with respect to any consent given or other action taken by DTC as registered owner of the Bonds. So long as any Bond is registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, the Registrar shall pay all principal of and interest on such Bond, and shall give all notices with respect to such Bond, only to Cede -& Co. in accordance with the Representation Letter, and all such payments shall be valid and effective to fully, satisfy and discharge the Issuer's obligations with respect to the principal of and interest on the Bonds to the extent of the sum or sums, so paid. No person other than DTC shall receive an authenticated Bond for each separate stated maturity evidencing the obligation of the Issuer to make payments of principal and interest. Upon delivery by DTC to the Registrar of written notice to the effect that DTC has determined to substitute a new nominee in place of Cede & Co., the Bonds will be transferable to such new nominee in accordance with paragraph (d) hereof. (c) In the event the Issuer determines that it is in the best interest of the Beneficial Owners that they be able to obtain Bonds in the form of bond certificates, the Issuer may notify DTC and the Registrar, whereupon DTC shall notify the Participants of the availability through DTC of Bonds in the form of certificates. In such event, the 10 Bonds will be transferable' 'in accordance with paragraph (d) hereof. DTC may determine to discontinue providing its services with respect to the Bonds at any time by giving notice to the Issuer and the Registrar- and discharging its responsibilities with respect thereto under applicable law. In such event the Bonds will be transferable in accordance with paragraph (d) hereof. (d) In the event that any transfer or exchange of Bonds is permitted under paragraph (b) or (c) hereof, such transfer or exchange shall be accomplished upon receipt by the Registrar of the Bonds to be transferred or exchanged and appropriate instruments of transfer to the permitted transferee in accordance with the provisions of this resolution. In the event Bonds in the form of certificates are issued to owners other than Cede & Co., its successor as nominee for DTC as owner of all the Bonds, or another securities depository as owner of all the Bonds, the provisions of this resolution shall also apply to all matters relating thereto, including, without limitation, the printing of such Bonds in the form of bond certificates and the method of payment of principal of and interest on such Bonds in the form of bond certificates. 2.09. Form of Bonds., The Bonds shall be printed in substantially the following form: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA GENERAL OBLIGATION PERMANENT IMPROVEMENT REVOLVING FUND BOND, SERIES 2005E No. R $ Rate Maturi Date of Original Issue CUSIP February 1, September 13, 2005 REGISTERED OWNER: CEDE & CO. PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: THE CITY OF EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA (the City), acknowledges itself to be indebted and hereby promises to pay to the registered owner named above, or registered assigns, the principal amount specified above on the maturity date specified above and promises to pay interest thereon from the date of original issue specified above or from the most recent Interest Payment Date (as hereinafter defined) to which interest has been paid or duly provided for, at the annual 11 rate specified above, payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing February 1, 2006 (each such date, an Interest Payment Date), all subject to the provisions referred to herein' with respect to the redemption of the principal of this Bond before maturity. The interest so payable on any Interest Payment Date shall be paid to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the fifteenth day (whether or not a business day) of the, calendar month next preceding such Interest Payment Date. Interest hereon shall be computed on the basis of a 360 -day year composed of twelve 30 -day months. The interest hereon and, upon presentation and surrender hereof, the principal hereof are payable in lawful money of the United States of America by check or draft by U.S. Bank National Association in St. Paul, Minnesota, as Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent (the Registrar), or its designated successor under the Resolution described herein. For the prompt and full payment. of such principal and interest as the same respectively become due, the full faith and credit and taxing powers of the City have been and are hereby irrevocably pledged. This Bond is one of an issue in the aggregate principal amount of $1,460,000 issued pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on August 16, 2005 (the Resolution), to maintain the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund of the City, a permanent fund established for the financing of local improvements for which special assessments may be levied against property specially benefitted thereby, and is issued pursuant to the charter of the City and in full conformity with the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota thereunto enabling,. including Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 429 and 475. The Bonds are issuable only in fully registered form, in denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof, of single maturities. Bonds maturing in 2013 and later years are each subject to redemption and prepayment at the option of the City, in whole or in part, in such order as the City shall determine and, within a maturity, by lot as selected by the Registrar (or, if applicable, by the bond depository in accordance with its customary procedures) in multiples of $5,000, on February 1, 2012, and on any date thereafter, at a price equal to the principal amount thereof plus interest accrued to the date of redemption. The City will cause notice of the call for redemption to be published as required by law and, at least thirty days prior to the designated redemption date, will cause notice of the call thereof to be mailed by first class mail to the registered owner of any Bond to be redeemed at the owner's address as it appears on the bond register maintained by the Registrar, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of proceedings for the redemption of any Bond not affected by such defect or failure. Official notice of redemption having been given as aforesaid, the Bonds or portions of Bonds so to be redeemed shall, on the redemption date, become due and payable. at the redemption price therein specified, and from and after such date (unless the City shall default in the payment of the redemption price) such Bonds or portions of Bonds shall cease to bear interest. Upon partial redemption of any Bond, a new Bond or Bonds will be delivered to the registered owner without charge, representing the remaining principal amount outstanding. 12 As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations set forth' therein, this Bond is transferable upon the books of the City at the principal office of the Registrar, by the registered owner hereof in person or by the owner's attorney duly authorized in writing upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or the owner's attorney; and may also be surrendered in exchange for Bonds of other authorized denominations. Upon such transfer or exchange the City will cause a new Bond or Bonds to be issued in the name of the transferee or registered owner, of the same aggregate principal amount, bearing interest at the same rate and maturing on the same date, subject to reimbursement for any tax, fee or governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. The City and the Registrar may deem and treat the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the absolute owner hereof, whether this Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment and for all other purposes, and neither the City nor the Registrar shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Bond, so long as this Bond is registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of The Depository Trust Company, or in the name of any other nominee of The Depository Trust Company or other securities depository, the Registrar shall pay all principal of and interest on this Bond, and shall give all notices with respect to this Bond, only to Cede & Co. or other nominee in accordance with the operational arrangements of The Depository Trust Company or other securities depository as agreed to by the City. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED, RECITED, COVENANTED AND AGREED that all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed preliminary to and in the issuance of this Bond in order to make it a valid and binding general obligation of the City in accordance with its terms, have been done, do exist, have happened and have been performed as so required; that prior to the issuance hereof the City has levied or agreed to levy special assessments on property specially benefited by the improvements financed by the Bonds and ad valorem taxes on all taxable property within the City, collectible in the years and amounts required to produce sums not less than five percent in excess of the principal of and interest on the Bonds as such principal and interest respectively become due, and has appropriated such special assessments and ad valorem taxes to the Revenue Account (the Revenue Account) of its Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund established by the Resolution; that, on or before each date the City is obligated to pay principal of or interest on the Bonds, the City will transfer from its Revenue Account to a separate General Obligation Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Bonds, Series 2005E Debt Service Account an amount sufficient for the payment of such principal and interest on such date; that if necessary for payment of principal and interest, additional ad valorem taxes are required to be levied upon all taxable property in the City, without limitation as to rate or amount; and that the issuance of this Bond, together with all other indebtedness of the City 13 outstanding on the date hereof and on the date of its actual issuance and delivery, does not cause the indebtedness of the City to exceed any constitutional, charter or statutory limitation of indebtedness. This Bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security or benefit under the Resolution until the Certificate of Authentication hereon shall have been executed by the Registrar by manual signature of one of its. authorized representatives. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused this Bond to be executed on its behalf by the facsimile signatures of the Mayor. and City Manager. City Manager 14 CITY OF EDINA Mayor CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This is one of the Bonds delivered pursuant to the Resolution mentioned within. Date of Authentication: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Registrar By Authorized Representative The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Bond, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM — as tenants in common UTMA ............. as Custodian for .................... TEN ENT — as tenants by entireties JT TEN — as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common (Cust) (Minor) under Uniform Transfers to Minors Act (State) Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. ASSIGNMENT For value received, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto the within Bond and all rights thereunder, and does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint attorney to transfer the said Bond on the books kept for registration of the within Bond, with full power of substitution in the premises. 15 Dated: NOTICE: The assignor's signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as it appears upon the face of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration or enlargement or any change whatsoever. Signature Guaranteed: Signature(s) must be guaranteed by an eligible guarantor 'institution meeting the requirements of the Registrar, which requirements include membership or participation in .STAMP or such other "signature guaranty program' as may be determined by the Registrar in addition to or in substitution for STAMP, all in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE: [end of Bond form] SECTION 3. USE OF PROCEEDS. The proceeds of the Bonds received by the City, exclusive of unused discount, pre- issuance accrued interest and capitalized interest, if any, shall be deposited in the Construction Fund established in Section 4 hereof and used to pay costs of the Projects or such other Improvements as the Council may designate. SECTION 4. CONSTRUCTION FUND. The City hereby establishes the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Series 2005E Construction Fund (the Construction Fund) as a separate bookkeeping account on its books and records. There shall be deposited into the Construction Fund,. when and as received, the amount specified in Section 3 hereof. There shall be established a separate account within the Construction Fund to record expenditures for each Improvement. The moneys in the Construction Fund will be disbursed by the City, in accordance with this Resolution and the City's normal procedures, to pay (or reimburse the City for) the costs of the Projects, including also the issuance costs of the Bonds. At such time as the Projects are completed the City shall transfer any remaining balance in the Construction Fund as provided herein. SECTION 5. GENERAL OBLIGATION PERMANENT IMPROVEMENT REVOLVING FUND BONDS, SERIES 2005E BOND FUND. So long as any of the Bonds are outstanding and any principal of or interest thereon unpaid, the City shall maintain a separate debt service fund on its official books and records to be known as the General Obligation Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Bonds, Series . 2005E Bond Fund (the Bond Fund) within the Debt Service Account of the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund (as described herein, the Debt Service Account), and the principal of 16 and interest on the Bonds shall be payable from the Bond Fund. The City irrevocably appropriates to the Bond Fund (a) any amount received from the Purchaser in excess of the amount required by Section 3 hereof to be deposited in the Construction Fund; (b) all moneys transferred with respect to the Bonds from other accounts within the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund to the Debt Service Account in accordance with this Resolution; and (c) all other moneys as shall be appropriated by the City Council to the Bond Fund from time to time. On the business day preceding each date on which principal of or interest on the Bonds are to be paid by the City in accordance with this resolution, the City Finance Director shall, without further direction by the Council, transfer from the Debt Service Account in the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund to the Bond Fund an amount sufficient to pay such principal and interest. If the aggregate balance in the Bond Fund is at any time insufficient to pay all interest and principal then due on all Bonds payable therefrom, the payment shall be made from any fund of the City which is available for that purpose, subject to reimbursement from the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund when the balance therein is sufficient, and the City Council covenants and agrees that it will each year levy a sufficient amount of ad valorem taxes to take care of any accumulated or anticipated deficiency, which levy is not subject to any constitutional or statutory limitation. SECTION 6. SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS. The City hereby covenants and agrees that, for the payment of the cost of the Projects, the City has done or will do and perform all acts and things necessary for the final and valid levy of special assessments in an amount not less than 20% of the cost of each of the improvements financed by the Bonds. The City estimates it will levy special assessments in the aggregate principal amount of $ It is estimated that the principal and interest on such special assessments will be levied and collected in the years and amounts shown on Exhibit II attached hereto. In the event any such assessment shall at any time be held invalid with respect to any lot or tract of land, due to any error, defect or irregularity in any action or proceeding taken or to be taken by the City or by the City Council or by any of the officers or employees of the City, either in the making of such assessment or in the performance of any condition precedent thereto, the City hereby covenants and agrees that it will forthwith do all such further things and take all such further proceedings as shall be required by law to make such assessment a valid and binding lien upon said property. Collections of special assessments shall be deposited into the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund. SECTION 7. PLEDGE OF TAXING POWERS. For the prompt and full payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds as such payments respectively become due, the full faith, credit and unlimited taxing powers of the City shall be and. are hereby irrevocably pledged. It is estimated that the special assessments to be levied as provided in Section 6 will be collected in amounts not less than five percent in excess of the amounts needed to meet when due the principal of and interest on the Bonds as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61. Consequently, no ad valorem taxes are 17 now. levied to pay the Bonds or the interest to come due thereon, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178, subdivision 2. SECTION 8. DEFEASANCE. When all of the Bonds have been discharged as provided in this section, all pledges, covenants and other rights granted by this Resolution to the holders of the Bonds shall cease. The City may discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds which are due on any date by depositing with the Registrar on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full; or, if any Bond should not be paid when due, it may nevertheless be discharged. by depositing with the Registrar a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full with interest accrued from the due date to the date of such deposit. The City may also discharge its obligations with respect to any prepayable Bonds called for redemption on any date when they are prepayable according to their terms, by depositing with the Registrar on or before that date an amount equal to the principal, interest and redemption premium, if any, which are then due, provided that notice of such redemption has been duly given as provided herein. The City may also at any time discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds, subject to the provisions of law now of hereafter authorizing and regulating such action, by depositing irrevocably in escrow,�with a bank qualified by law as an escrow agent for this purpose, cash or securities which are authorized by law to be so deposited, bearing interest payable at such time and at such rates and maturing or callable at the holder's option on such dates as shall be required to pay all principal, interest and redemption premiums to become due thereon to maturity or earlier designated redemption date. SECTION 9. CERTIFICATION OF PROCEEDINGS. 9.01. Registration of Bonds. The Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the County Auditor of. Hennepin County, together with such additional information as the Auditor may require, and to obtain from the Auditor a certificate that the Bonds .have been duly entered upon the Auditor's bond register and the tax required by law has been levied. 9.02. Authentication of Transcript. The officers of the City and the County Auditor are hereby authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the Purchaser and to Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Bond Counsel, certified copies of all proceedings and records relating to the Bonds and such other affidavits, certificates and information as may be required to show the facts relating to the legality and marketability of the Bonds, as the same appear from the books and records in their custody and control or as otherwise known to them, and all such certified copies, affidavits and certificates, including any heretofore furnished, shall be deemed representations of the City as to the correctness of all statements contained therein. 9.03. Official Statement. The Official Statement relating to the Bonds, dated August 5, 2005, and the supplement thereto, relating to the Bonds prepared and distributed by Ehlers & Associates, Inc., the financial advisor for the City, is hereby f>E: approved. Ehlers & Associates, Inc., is hereby authorized on behalf of the City to prepare and distribute to the Purchaser within seven business days from the date hereof, a supplement to the Official Statement listing the offering price, the interest rates, selling compensation, delivery date, the underwriters and such other information relating to the Bonds required to be included in the Official Statement by Rule 15c2 -12 adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to execute such certificates as may be appropriate concerning the accuracy, completeness and sufficiency of the Official Statement. 9.04. Authorization of Payment of Certain Costs of Issuance of the Bonds. Authorization of Payment of Certain Costs of Issuance of the Bonds. The Issuer authorizes the Purchaser to forward the amount of Bond proceeds allocable to the payment of issuance expenses to Resource Bank & Trust Company, Minneapolis, Minnesota, on the closing date for further distribution as directed by the Issuer's financial advisor, Ehlers & Associates, Inc., SECTION 10. TAX COVENANTS; ARBITRAGE MATTERS; REIMBURSEMENT AND CONTINUING DISCLOSURE. 10.01. General Tax Covenant. The City covenants and agrees with the registered owners of the Bonds, that it will not take, or permit to be taken by any of its officers, employees or agents, any action which would cause the interest payable on the Bonds to become subject to taxation under the Code and applicable Treasury Regulations (the Regulations), and covenants to take any and all actions within its powers to ensure that the interest on the Bonds will not become includable in gross income of the recipient under the Code and the Regulations. The Projects financed by the Bonds shall at all times during the term of the Bonds be owned and maintained by the City as part of its infrastructure and the City shall not enter into any lease, use agreement, management agreement, capacity agreement or . other agreement or contract with any nongovernmental person relating to the use of the Projects, or any of them, or security for the payment of the Bonds which might cause the Bonds to be considered "private activity bonds" or "private loan bonds" pursuant to Section 141 of the Code. 10.02. Arbitrage Certification. The Mayor and Manager being the officers of the City charged with the responsibility for issuing the Bonds pursuant to this resolution, are authorized and directed to execute and deliver to the Purchaser a certificate in accordance with the provisions of Section 148 of the Code, and applicable Regulations, stating the facts, estimates and circumstances in existence on the date of issue and delivery of the Bonds which make it reasonable to expect that the proceeds of the Bonds will not be used in a manner that would cause the Bonds to be arbitrage bonds within the meaning of the Code and Regulations. 19 10.03. Arbitrage Rebate. The Issuer shall take such actions as are required to comply with the arbitrage rebate requirements of paragraphs (2) and (3) of Section 148(f) of the Code.' 10.04. Reimbursement. The City certifies that the proceeds of the Bonds will not be used by the City to reimburse itself for any expenditure with respect to the Projects which the City paid or will have paid more than 60 days prior to the. issuance of the Bonds unless, with respect to such prior expenditures,. the City shall have made a declaration of official intent which complies with the provisions of Section 1.150 -2 of the Regulations; provided that this certification shall not apply (i) with respect to certain de minimis expenditures, if any, with respect to the Projects meeting the requirements of Section 1.150- 2(f)(1) of the Regulations, or (ii) with respect to "preliminary expenditures" for the Projects as defined in Section 1.150- 2(f)(2) of the Regulations, including engineering or architectural .expenses and similar preparatory expenses, which in the aggregate do not exceed 20% of the "issue price" of the Bonds. 10.05 Continuing Disclosure. (a) Purpose and Beneficiaries. To provide for the public availability of certain information relating to the Bonds and the security therefor and to permit the original purchaser and other participating underwriters in the primary offering of the Bonds to comply with amendments to Rule 15c2 -12 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 C.F.R. § 240.15c2 -12), relating to continuing disclosure (as in effect and interpreted from time to time, the Rule), which will enhance the marketability of the Bonds, the City hereby makes the following covenants and agreements for the benefit of the Owners (as hereinafter defined) from time to time of the Outstanding Bonds. The City is the only "obligated person" in respect of the Bonds within the meaning of the Rule for purposes of identifying the entities in respect of which continuing disclosure must be made. The City has complied in. all material respects with any undertaking previously entered into by it under the Rule. If the City fails to comply with any provisions of this section, any person aggrieved thereby, including the Owners of any Outstanding Bonds, may take whatever action at law or in equity may appear necessary or appropriate to enforce performance and observance of any agreement or covenant contained in this section, including an action for a writ of mandamus or specific performance. Direct, indirect, consequential and punitive damages shall not be recoverable for any default hereunder to the extent permitted by law. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained. herein, in no event shall a default under this section constitute a default under the Bonds or under any other provision of this resolution. As used in this section, "Owner" or "Bondowner" means, in respect of a Bond, the registered owner or owners thereof appearing in the bond register maintained by the Registrar or any "Beneficial Owner" (as hereinafter defined) thereof, if such Beneficial Owner provides to the Registrar evidence of such beneficial ownership in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Registrar. As used herein, "Beneficial Owner" means, in respect of a Bond, any person or entity which (i) has the power, directly or indirectly, to vote or consent with respect to, or to dispose of ownership of, such Bond (including persons or entities holding Bonds through C nominees, depositories or other intermediaries), or (ii) is treated as the owner of the Bond for federal income tax purposes. (b) Information To Be Disclosed. The City will provide, in the manner set forth in subsection (c) hereof, either directly or indirectly through an agent designated by the City, the following information at the following times: (1) on or before 365 days after the end of each fiscal year of the City, commencing with the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005, the following financial information and operating data in respect of the City (the Disclosure Information): (A) the audited financial statements of the City for such fiscal year, accompanied by the audit report and opinion of the accountant or government auditor relating thereto, as permitted or required by the laws of the State of Minnesota, containing balance sheets as of the end of such fiscal year and a statement of operations, changes in fund balances and cash flows for the fiscal year then ended, showing in comparative form such figures for the preceding fiscal year of the City, prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles promulgated by the Financial Accounting Standards Board as modified in accordance with the governmental accounting standards promulgated by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board or as otherwise provided under Minnesota law, as in effect from time to time, or, if and to the extent such financial statements have not been prepared in accordance with such generally accepted accounting principles for reasons beyond the reasonable control of the City, noting the discrepancies therefrom and the effect thereof, and certified as to accuracy and completeness in all material respects by the fiscal officer of the City; and (B) to the extent not included in the financial statements referred to in paragraph (A) hereof, the information for such fiscal year or for the period most recently available of the type contained in the Official Statement under headings: Current Property Valuations, Direct Debt, Tax Levies and Collections, Population Trend and Employment/ Unemployment, which information may be unaudited. Notwithstanding the foregoing paragraph, if the audited financial statements are not available by the date specified, the City shall provide on or before such date unaudited financial statements in the format required for the audited financial statements as part of the Disclosure Information and, within 10 days after the receipt thereof, the City shall provide the audited financial statements. Any or all of the Disclosure Information may be incorporated by reference, if it is updated as required hereby, from other documents, including official statements, which have been submitted to each of the repositories hereinafter referred to under subsection (b) or the SEC. If the document incorporated 21 by reference is a final official statement, it must be available from the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. The City shall. clearly identify in the Disclosure Information each document 'so incorporated by reference. If any part of the Disclosure Information can no longer be generated because the operations of the City have materially changed or been discontinued, such Disclosure Information need no longer be provided if the City includes in the Disclosure Information a statement to such effect; provided, however, if such operations have been replaced by other City operations in respect of which data is not included in the Disclosure Information and the City determines that certain specified data regarding such replacement operations would be a Material Fact (as defined in paragraph (2) hereof), then, from and after such determination, the Disclosure Information shall include such additional specified data regarding the replacement operations. If the Disclosure Information is changed or this section is amended as permitted by this paragraph (b)(1), then the City shall include in the next Disclosure Information to be delivered hereunder, to the extent necessary, an explanation of the reasons for the amendment and the effect of any change in the type of financial information or operating data provided. (2) In a timely manner, notice of the occurrence of any of the following events which is a Material Fact (as hereinafter defined): (A) Principal and interest payment delinquencies; (B) Non - payment related defaults; (C) Unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial difficulties; (D) Unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting financial difficulties; (E) Substitution of credit or liquidity providers, or their failure to perform; (F) Adverse tax opinions or events affecting the tax - exempt status of the security; (G) Modifications to rights of security holders; (H) Bond calls; (I) Defeasances; (J) Release, substitution, or sale of property securing repayment of the securities; and (K) Rating changes. As used herein, a "Material Fact" is a fact as to which a substantial likelihood exists that a reasonably prudent investor would attach importance thereto in deciding to buy, hold or sell a Bond or, if not disclosed, would significantly alter the total information otherwise available to an investor from the Official Statement, information disclosed hereunder or information generally available to the public. Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, a "Material Fact" is also an event that would be deemed "material" for purposes of the purchase, holding or sale of a Bond within the meaning of applicable federal securities laws, as interpreted at the time of discovery of the occurrence of the event. 22 (3) In a timely manner, notice of the occurrence of any of the following events or conditions: (A) the failure of the City to provide the Disclosure Information required under paragraph (b)(1) at the time specified thereunder; (B) the amendment or supplementing of this section pursuant to subsection (d), together with a copy of such amendment or supplement and any explanation provided by the City under subsection (d)(2); (C) the termination of the obligations of the City under this section pursuant to 'subsection (d); (D) any change in the accounting principles pursuant to which the financial statements constituting a portion of the Disclosure Information or the audited financial statements, if any, furnished pursuant to subsection (b)(2) or (3) are prepared; and (E) any change in the fiscal year of the City. (c) Manner of Disclosure. The City agrees to make available the information described in subsection (b) to the following entities by telecopy, overnight delivery, mail or other means, as appropriate: (1) the information described in paragraphs (1), (2) and (3) of subsection (b), to each then nationally recognized municipal securities information repository under the Rule and to any state information depository then designated or operated by the State of Minnesota as contemplated by the Rule (the State Depository), if any; and (2) the information described in subsection (b), to any rating agency then maintaining a rating of the Bonds and, at the expense of such Bondowner, to any Bondowner who requests in writing such information, at the time of transmission under paragraphs (1) or (2) of this subsection (c), as the case may be, or, if such information is transmitted with a subsequent time of release, at the time such information is to be released. (d) Term; Amendments; Interpretation. (1) The covenants of the City in this section shall remain in effect so long as any Bonds are Outstanding. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, however, the obligations of the City under this section shall terminate and be without further effect as of any date on which the City delivers to the Registrar an opinion of Bond Counsel to the effect that, because of legislative action or final judicial or administrative actions or proceedings, the failure of the City to comply with the requirements of this section will not cause participating underwriters in the primary offering of the Bonds to be in violation of the Rule or other applicable requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or any statutes or laws successory thereto or amendatory thereof. 23 (2) This section (and the form and requirements of the Disclosure Information) may be amended or supplemented by the City from time to time, without notice to (except as provided in paragraph (c)(3) hereof) or the consent of the Owners of any Bonds, by a resolution of this Board filed in the office of the recording officer of the City accompanied by an opinion of Bond Counsel, who may rely on certificates of the City and others and the opinion may be subject to customary qualifications, to the effect that: (i) such amendment or supplement (a) is made in connection with a change in circumstances that arises from a change in law or regulation'or a change in the identity, nature or status of the City or the type of operations conducted by the City, or (b) is required by, or better complies with, the provisions of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule; (ii) this section as so amended or supplemented would have complied with the requirements of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule at the time of the primary offering of the Bonds, giving effect to any change in circumstances applicable under clause (i)(a) and assuming that the Rule as in effect and interpreted at the time of the amendment or supplement was in effect at the time of the primary offering; and (iii) such amendment or supplement does not materially impair the interests of the Bondowners under the Rule. If the Disclosure Information is so amended, the City agrees to provide, contemporaneously with the effectiveness of such amendment, an explanation of the reasons for the. amendment and the effect, if any, of the change in the type of financial information or operating data being provided hereunder. (3) This section is entered into to comply with the continuing disclosure provisions of the Rule and should be construed so as to. satisfy the requirements of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule. ATTEST: Adopted this 16th day of August, 2005. City Clerk Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City 24 Council at its Regular Meeting of August 16, 2005, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 25 ,20 City Clerk John Keprios, Director Edina Park & Recreation Department 4801 West 50`h Street Edina, MN 55424 Office (952) 826 -0430 FAX (952) 826 -0385 Jkeprios@ci.edina.mn.us Memo To: Mayor Hovland and Council Members. From: John Keprios CC: Gordon Hughes Date: August 16, 2005 Re: MRPA AWARD OF EXCELLENCE FOR PASSPORT TO PLAY At the August 16, 2005, Council meeting, the City of Edina will be presented with the Award of Excellence from the Minnesota Recreation and Park Association (MRPA) for Edinborough Park's involvement in a new marketing program called "Passport To Play." Adaptive Recreation Supervisor from the City of Eden Prairie, Nicole White, will be presenting the award. Assistant Manager of Edinborough Park, Ann Kattreh, will be present to receive the award with the Mayor and Council. Passport To Play is a creative and successful marketing collaborative between the Cities of Edina, New Brighton, Eagan, and Woodbury that is designed to encourage youth to visit each one of the four indoor playground venues. For $10.00, youth can visit each indoor playground once for $1.00 off the advertised admission fee; each youth receives a clever passport photo that gets stamped at each visit; after visiting all four sites, the youth receives a t -shirt and is allowed to visit one of the four sites of their choice at no charge. This clever marketing program has encouraged over 50 youth to date to visit all four indoor playground locations. We are very proud to be recognized by MRPA for this creative program. oe \ tea 0 yi RECOGNITION OF FIRE DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL FOR CONFINED SPACE RESCUE No packet data [—] Oral presentation Information coming MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JULY 5, 2005 5:30 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Hulbert, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Mayor Hovland stated the purpose of the Special Meeting was to receive reports from the staff and the City's consultant pertaining to Edina's street reconstruction assessment policy. Tom Day, MAI, SRA, of the Valuation Group reviewed for the Council the results of his report. Mr. Day said that he had conducted an inspection and appraisal consulting work on three sample neighborhoods in Edina: South Harriet Park, Sunnyslope and Rolling Green. Mr. Day presented the Council with the data, summary of the analysis completed, commentary, value conclusion and recommendations pertaining to the City's street reconstruction assessment policy based upon his work with the three aforementioned neighborhoods. Assistant Manager Anderson presented the results of his survey of surrounding communities' special assessment policies for total roadway reconstruction projects. After receiving the information the City Council discussed briefly the data, then directed staff to further research possible policy modifications to be reported at a later date. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 6:55 P.M. Debra Mangen, City Clerk MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL July 19, 2005 5:30 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Mayor Hovland said the purpose of the special work session was to review issues that will affect the preparation of the City's 2006 Operating Budget. Manager Hughes suggested the Council keep in mind while reviewing the budget scenarios that it will consider the issuance of bonds for the purpose of constructing gymnasiums on the Community Center campus. The first year's debt service for the bonds will be levied in 2006. Therefore, the effect of the bonds on the taxes should be considered when evaluating the 2006 general fund budget. Mr. Hughes stated the State of Minnesota Legislators adjourned their Special Session after passage of a number of bills affecting Minnesota cities. He noted potential effects included: • No levy limits for 2006. As with 2005, the City's 2006 property tax levy will not be restricted by the State. • No "Turbo Charged Truth In Taxation ". The Governor had proposed new process whereby the annual Truth in Taxation notice would include a "tear off" for the purpose of allowing taxpayers to initiate a referendum allowing voters to override a Council- approved levy increase that was not enacted by the Legislature. • No property Tax Freeze. Earlier in 2005 the Senate had passed legislation calling for a property tax freeze, however, this legislation was not included in the bills adopted during the special session. • Market Value Homestead Credit (MVHC) not funded. In 2005, the Council correctly predicted this would not be funded and it was not included in the State's Budget legislation, so the recommendation was to assume it would be lost aid in 2006 also. • Increase in Pension Contributions. Significant increases were approved in the legislation for both employer and employees contributions to PERA. The employer contribution for police and fire employees will increase by almost 13% and the employer for other public employee funds will increase by 8.5 %. Additional increases were planned for the next several years. The 2006 increase will require a budget increase of $110,000. Mr. Hughes reviewed forecasts used in developing the 2006 scenarios, which included: Minutes/Edina Cites Council/Special Meeting Tuly 19, 2005 Expenditures: • Wage and Employee Benefits - a three percent wage increase for our employees is included plus an additional 1 /2% to account for employees who will go through salary steps in 2006 • Insurance Increases - Employee health insurance has an expected increase of twelve percent for 2006 • Contractual Services, Commodities - A two percent across the board increase in contractual services and commodities and a three percent increase in central service expenses were projected for 2006 • Budget Adjustments - Department Heads' proposed new programs/ expenditures for 2006 Revenues: • Non -Tax Revenue - Based upon the last three years, a higher revenue projected has been forecast, principally from building permit and ambulance fees, plus higher revenues from investment earnings were projected due to higher short term interest rates. This would reduce dependance on property tax revenues to support the 2006 budget. Mr. Hughes reviewed the following calendar for the 2006 Budget development: • July 19, 2005 - Budget Assumption Work Session • August 12, 2005 - Budget submitted to Council • August 16, 2005 - Budget hearing • September 6, 2005 Council Resolution setting maximum tax levy adopted • December 2005 - Truth in Taxation hearings and final budget adoption Mr. Hughes reviewed possible budget scenarios. The first one included all the requested 2006 new programs/ expenditures and would result in an approximate 8.76 percent increase in expenditures and corresponding 9.03 percent increase in taxes. The third scenario included Mr. Hughes recommendations for new programs/ expenditures would result. in a 5.48 percent increase in expenditures and a corresponding 4.60 percent increase in taxes. The Council briefly discussed the pros and cons of increasing the Council and Mayor salaries; gave direction about the percentage increases they would feel reasonable for 2006; and reviewed the proposed schedule for 2006 Budget preparation and adoption. A hearing was scheduled for 5:00 p.m. on August 16, 2005, before the regular Council meeting. There being no further business, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 6:55 p.m. Debra Mangen, City Clerk MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL AUGUST 2, 2005 5:30 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Mayor Hovland stated the purpose of the Special Meeting was to review and discuss potential changes to the City's special assessment policies. Assistant Manager Anderson presented the proposed special assessment policy as follows: 1. Cost of Non -State Aid Residential Street curb and gutter will be financed by the Stormwater Utility Fund. For the 2004 -2005 assessment projects, this will require an increase in Stormwater rates of approximately $2.00 per household per quarter. Rationale - The Curb and gutter system is an above - the - ground water drainage system that controls stormwater within the City. Staff feels very strongly about the addition of curb and gutter in the City where it does not exist today. It is very important in areas of poor soil condition, steep grade changes or very flat conditions. It also decreases the degradation of the residential roadway system, reduces fall and spring street maintenance and aids in street cleaning and snow plowing. Projects to be reimbursed by proposed change (to be assessed Oct. 2005): Halifax & Grimes - $137,000 (approx 24% of street costs) Shannon Dr. - $18,000 (100% of assessable costs) Sunnyslope - $40,000 (6% of assessable costs) Bridge Lane - $10,000 (9% of assessable costs) Total $ 205,000 Curb and Gutter Cost Projections for Future Year Assessment Projects: Estimated cost for 2006 - $441,000 ( +2.14 per household per quarter) Estimated cost for 2007 - $621,000 (+1.56/ per household per quarter) Attachment: Survey of Stormwater Rates 2005 2. Street Reconstruction Cost (excluding curb and gutter) should be assessed at 100% of the cost. Rationale - Based on an appraisal study conducted by the Valuation Group, the consultants indicated that the market value benefit of the street improvements equates to the cost of the improvements being done. Assuming Council agrees with the financing of curb and gutter improvements, the risk of losing an assessment challenge by a resident or neighborhood is diminished due to the extensive study that was conducted and the subsidy of the curb and gutter cost. In most projects, the street reconstruction cost represents only a percentage of the entire project costs. Most projects include other stormwater improvements as well as sanitary sewer and water system improvements. . The table below shows the total and assessable costs of projects that will be assessed this fall. Page 1 Minutes/ dhn City Council/Special Meeting August 2, 2005 3. The assessable unit for non-state aid rent footage a street of the projects should be the residential equivalent unit (Lot) rather g Rationale -Trips generated for residential lots are the same regardless of the size of the lot. A resident Tr a corner lot, cul -de -sac or circular street does not use. the roads differently than a mid -block resident on the same street. 4. If a corner lot is subject to multiple street reconstruction assessments over a period of years, the total assessable cost should be the equivalent to 1 residential equivalent unit. Rationale - Current policy allows the assessment of the front of a corner lot to be assessed at one R.E.U. and the side lot for another assessment project to be assessed at 1/3 of an R.E.U. Staff believes that the total of both assessments should not exceed one R.E.U. so that lots are equitably assessed over the City. A corner lot does not generate more trips onto the residential roadway system than .a non -corner lot. 5. Multiple Assessments cannot be treated differently than areas with one assessment being incurred. Rationale - Assessments must be equitable to all homes that are being assessed. This issue was driven by the potential of a portion of the Country Club being assessed for sound walls and residential road reconstruction. If and when the Country Club area gets assessed for street improvements, you have the option to re- assess the sound wall improvement to a longer term. By re-assessing, you could leave the oundawall assessment at potential t term of If a challenge .was raised, y 15 years and decide not to re- assess. 6. The term of residential roadway reconstruction assessments should stay at 10 years. Rationale - There was some discussion of extending the term of residential roadway reconstruction to 15 years. While this would be legal, rating agencies prefer the term for residential assessments to match the term of the bonds. This would also increase the interest cost to the homeowner 7. Assessment Interest Rate - The interest rate of the assessment should be pegged to the assessment bonds that have been issued in the past 12 months or the 10 year Aaa bond rate plus 2 %. Rationale - The City's Assessments over the past few years have charged a fixed rate of around 6.5 %. This new index will better reflect the City's borrowing rate. Based on today's rate the index would be around 5.8- 5.95 %. The additional 2% covers the cost of bond Page 2 Cost of All Curb & Assessable % Pro'ect Improvements Gutter Cost Assessable Halifax &Grimes $ 888,900 $ 137,000 $ $ 420,000 588,000 47% 57% So. Harriet Park $ $ 1,029,872 1,028,218 $ $ - 40,000 $ 663,000 64% Sunn sloe Schaefer Rd. $ 264,290 $ - $ 195,000 74% Shannon Dr: $ 168,719 $ $ 18,000 9,975 $ $ - 97,000 0% 91% Bridge Lane $ 106,601 3. The assessable unit for non-state aid rent footage a street of the projects should be the residential equivalent unit (Lot) rather g Rationale -Trips generated for residential lots are the same regardless of the size of the lot. A resident Tr a corner lot, cul -de -sac or circular street does not use. the roads differently than a mid -block resident on the same street. 4. If a corner lot is subject to multiple street reconstruction assessments over a period of years, the total assessable cost should be the equivalent to 1 residential equivalent unit. Rationale - Current policy allows the assessment of the front of a corner lot to be assessed at one R.E.U. and the side lot for another assessment project to be assessed at 1/3 of an R.E.U. Staff believes that the total of both assessments should not exceed one R.E.U. so that lots are equitably assessed over the City. A corner lot does not generate more trips onto the residential roadway system than .a non -corner lot. 5. Multiple Assessments cannot be treated differently than areas with one assessment being incurred. Rationale - Assessments must be equitable to all homes that are being assessed. This issue was driven by the potential of a portion of the Country Club being assessed for sound walls and residential road reconstruction. If and when the Country Club area gets assessed for street improvements, you have the option to re- assess the sound wall improvement to a longer term. By re-assessing, you could leave the oundawall assessment at potential t term of If a challenge .was raised, y 15 years and decide not to re- assess. 6. The term of residential roadway reconstruction assessments should stay at 10 years. Rationale - There was some discussion of extending the term of residential roadway reconstruction to 15 years. While this would be legal, rating agencies prefer the term for residential assessments to match the term of the bonds. This would also increase the interest cost to the homeowner 7. Assessment Interest Rate - The interest rate of the assessment should be pegged to the assessment bonds that have been issued in the past 12 months or the 10 year Aaa bond rate plus 2 %. Rationale - The City's Assessments over the past few years have charged a fixed rate of around 6.5 %. This new index will better reflect the City's borrowing rate. Based on today's rate the index would be around 5.8- 5.95 %. The additional 2% covers the cost of bond Page 2 Minutes/Edina City Council/Special Meeting August 2, 2005 issuance, delinquencies and underpayments. Since the assessment debt is General Obligation debt, the rating' agencies would pxefer the City use a conservative spread on the interest rate to prevent the need to go to the taxpayers to cover any shortfalls in the assessment proceeds. The table below compares the proposed new rate with other communities: city Calculation Index Assessment Rate Edina Bloomin on Bond Rate + 2% Bond Rate + 1% 3.92% 3.92% 5.92% 4.92% Plymouth Prime Rate +.5% 6.25% 6.75% Fridley None 1 6.50% Maple Grove None 6.00% 8. The City will accept both partial pre - payments and full pre - payments on assessments before going to the County for tax rolls. For ease of administration, a minimum of 25% of the assessable cost must be applied'for a partial payment. Rationale - City past practice allowed only 100% pre - payment on assessments. Many residents have inquired in the past about partial pre - payments to reduce their annual tax bill. This will create some extra calculations, but this is a good public relations move with a minor increase in workload. The full and partial pre - payments can only occur after the assessment hearing and before the certification to the County. This gives the resident approximately 30 days to make the payment. 9. Payment Schedule - Currently, assessments are calculated on a level principal payment schedule. This results in a declining payment schedule which is cheaper than a traditional amortized schedule which would have equal payments over the life of the assessment. Staff is open to either calculation, but does not want to have the resident to be able to choose either method. This would result in very onerous administration of the assessments. Rationale - Mr. Anderson presented possible payment schedules that could be utilized. 10. The new policy will not be retroactive to projects that have already been assessed. Rationale: It would be very difficult to determine how many years to go back and re- assess projects that have been completed and already assessed. Our research with other City's policies indicates that all cities made a clean break when beginning their new programs. 11. A couple of elements of the Senior Deferral Program should change for equity and fairness. Rationale: a. The current interest rate for the deferral program is one percentage point higher than the standard assessment rate. This should be changed to reflect the new interest rate adopted in this policy (bond rate plus 2 %) b. The current deferral policy requires that both spouses live in the residence. This should be changed to reflect situations that have one of the spouses residing in a facility that accommodates health care situations (i.e. assisted living centers, etc.) Page 3 Minutes/Edina City Council/Special Meeting August 2, 2005 Following Mr. Anderson's presentation, the Council discussed the implications of instituting a special assessment policy, the impact upon homeowners with large assessments coming closely together such as the sound wall improvement and roadway reconstruction within two to three years, the interest rate charged by the City and whether or not a level payment amortization should be allowed. The Council directed staff to further refine the policy and place it on the August 16, 2005, Council agenda for consideration. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 6:40 P.M. Debra Mangen, City Clerk Page 4 I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL AUGUST 2, 2005 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members, Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Swenson approving the Council Consent Agenda as presented, with the exception of Agenda Item III.B. Contract No. ENG 05 -9 Sunnyslope Area Lighting Improvements (Imp. No. L44). Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 19, 2005, APPROVED Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Swenson, approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina City Council for July 19, 2005. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATION FOR EMPLOYER SUPPORT OF GUARD AND RESERVE (ESGR) PRESENTED Brigadier General Pollmann, thanked the City of Edina for the support of the Guard and Reserve (ESGR) members who serve to protect liberty, and the freedoms we value. He presented Certificates of Appreciation to former Mayor Dennis Maetzold and City Manager Hughes for being a patriotic, supporting employer. He thanked City Appraiser, Moreau Sankey for his service in the Guard for over a year. Former Mayor Maetzold voiced his pride with the reserve and thanked the City of Edina and corporations that support the effort of their employees with their decision to serve in the United States military. *HEARING DATE SET OF AUGUST 16, 2005 - PRELIMINARY REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - RIVERVIEW COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES - 50TH AND INDIANOLA AVENUE Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Swenson setting August 16, 2005, as hearing date for Preliminary Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, final Development Plan, Amendment to Comprehensive Plan for Riverview Commercial Properties - 50th and Indianola Avenue. Motion carried on rollcall vote - fie ayes. RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -67 - PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT APPROVED FOR ARROWHEAD HEIGHTS Attorney Gilligan stated the approval of the proposed subdivision was at the direction of the judge who ruled on the lawsuit brought against the Page 1 Minutes/Edina City Council/August 2, 2005 City by the proponent who had been denied the subdivision of his property at 6800 Indian Hills Road. Mr. Gilligan explained the Court's order required the Council to grant the approval of either the first application which had been denied on March 1, 2004 or the second application that had been denied on July 6, 2004. Mr. Gilligan said the present owner had submitted an application that was essentially a reapplication of the March 1, 2004, application for subdivision. He noted the Council should as required by the Court's Order in Pedersen v. City of Edina, grant preliminary and final plat approval for the proposed subdivision. The only condition that may be attached to the approval would be the subdivision dedication. Sharon Privot, 6728 Indian Hills Road, complained that inadequate notice had been given to the neighbors before the meeting concerning the proposed subdivision. Henry Privot, 6728 Indian Hills Road, said he had attended many meetings regarding the proposed subdivision. Mr. Privot told the Council they failed the constituents by not voting the subdivision of 6800 Indian Hills Road down in 2004. Following a brief discussion of the amount of the subdivision dedication, Member Housh introduced the following resolution and moved it adoption with a subdivision dedication of $28,000.00. RESOLUTION NO. 2005-67 GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT AND FINAL PLAT APPROVAL TO ARROWHEAD HEIGHTS 6800 INDIAN HILLS ROAD BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled, "ARROWHEAD HEIGHTS ", platted by Legacy Holdings -ED, LLC, a Minnesota Limited Liability Company, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council on August 2, 2005, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat and final plat approval conditioned upon Subdivision Dedication of $28,000.00. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Swenson, Hovland Nays: Hulbert, Masica Motion carried. *AWARD OF BID FOR SALT FOR SNOW AND ICE CONTROL FOR PUBLIC WORKS APPROVED Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Swenson for award of bid for salt for, snow and ice control to sole bidder, North American Salt Co., under State contract #434468 at $36.00 per ton delivered. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. BID AWARDED FOR CONTRACT NO. ENG 05 -9 SUNNYSLOPE AREA LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS (IMP, NO. L-44) Member Masica removed the award of bid for Contract No. ENG 05 -9 for Sunnyslope area lighting improvements, (IMP No. L-44) for more information. She questioned what the process was when a bid came in lower than the Engineer's estimate. Assistant Engineer Lillehaug noted that the Engineer's estimate was for Page 2 I Minutes/Edina City Council/August 2, 2005 both the roadway and lighting and in combination still equated to the total estimated amount. Member Masica made a motion for award of bid for Contract No. ENG 05 -9, Sunnyslope Area Lighting Improvements (IMP. No. L044) to recommended low bidder, Killmer Electric Co., Inc., at $77,674.00. Member Hulbert seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. BID AWARDED FOR VEHICLE EXHAUST REMOVAL SYSTEM FOR THE FIRE DEPARTMENT Chief Scheerer indicated the award of bid was to purchase two vehicle exhaust removal systems for Fire Station #1 and Fire Station #2. The system was a vacuum type of system that connects a large hose to the exhaust of the fire vehicles and prevents diesel exhaust from entering the fire station living and apparatus areas. The purchase would be from the Capital Improvement Program funds and was budgeted at $55,000.00. Mr. Scheerer said the bid was approximately $1,226.00 over the estimated amount. An OSHA grant has been applied for and could reduce the bid by approximately $20,000, if awarded. The system was recommended by NFPA and OSHA for fire stations. Staff recommends awarding the bid. Member Masica inquired if the grant were awarded in the amount of $20,000.00, what would happen to the overage in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Mr. Hughes said hard engineering estimates were not done in the CIP, some projects were over, some under. Member Swenson made a motion approving the award of bid for a vehicle exhaust removal system for the Fire Department to recommended low bidder, TNC Industries, Inc., at $56,226.00. Member Hulbert seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING FOR TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP FOR TIME WARNER CABLE Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Mr. Hughes noted the City received notice of Time Warner's intent to transfer control of the cable system to Comcast Cable Communications, LLC in mid -June. He explained the Council must conduct a public hearing as required under the City's cable regulatory ordinance for the purpose of transferring its cable franchise. Mr. Hughes said the City was a member of the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission which handled the regulatory oversight of cable television matters on the City's behalf. Council Member Housh and he serve on the Board of Directors of the Cable Commission. Attorneys for the Commission were preparing a report regarding the proposed transfer of ownership as well as legal, technical and financial qualifications of Comcast. On September 1, 2005, the Commission would meet to review the findings of the report prepared by the Commissions attorneys and to develop a recommendation for further City action. Page 3 Minutes/Edina City Council/August 2, 2005 Mr. Hughes indicated the City does not yet have the benefit of the Commission's recommendations, but recommended that the City listen to all interested parties at this public hearing on August 2, 2005, and thereafter continue the hearing until the September 6, 2005, Council meeting. At that time, the attorneys for the Commission will present the Commission's recommendation for the City's review and consideration. Also, at that time, the City may determine whether to accept or reject Time Warner's request for transfer or elect to take action at a future meeting. The deadline for the City action on the transfer would be mid- October; therefore the process has been scheduled to provide sufficient time to complete City action prior to the deadline. Member Masica commented she had received a call from a resident near Garden Park who inquired about a building in the park being operated by a private franchise in a public park. Mr. Hughes said he recollected that approximately ten years ago, the Council approved the building being used by the Park Department for storage as well as for cable company storage. He said it would be appropriate to refer the issue to the Commissions attorney for an opinion. Mr. Hughes said he would research and inform the Council of the history of the Garden Park building. Public Comment Mayor Hovland noted the receipt of a letter dated July 28, 2005, from Ben Franske, 6014 Arbour Avenue, requesting a PEG studio be negotiated for Edina Schools as part of the transfer of ownership of Time Warner Cable. No one appeared to comment. Member Masica made a motion to continue the public hearing to the. regular Council Meeting of September 6, 2005. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *TECHNICAL CORRECTON TO TUNE 7, 2005, COUNCIL MINUTES AND RESOLUTION NO 2005 -47 AND RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -48 Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Swenson approving technical corrections to the June 7, 2005, Council Meeting Minutes, Resolutions No. 2005 -47 and 2005 -48. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR PROSECUTION SERVICES REQUESTED Mr. Hughes noted that at the budget forecast meeting recently, the Council discussed the advisability of soliciting proposals for the City's prosecution services and requested the issue be on the August 2, 2005, agenda for further discussion. Mr. Hughes stated the City's prosecuting attorney was responsible for prosecuting petty misdemeanor, misdemeanor and gross misdemeanor level crimes which typically include traffic offenses, domestic abuse and commercial crimes such as shoplifting and credit card fraud. Traffic related offenses constitute the majority of activity. The 2005 budget for prosecution was $255,000.00. Page 4 1 Minutes/Edina City Council/August 2, 2005 Prosecution for Edina was high, due primarily #o our traffic enforcement efforts and the large volume of commercial activities occurring in the City and numbers continue to grow. In 2004, prosecutors handled 5,979 arraignments, 739 pre - trials, 249 court trials and 183 jury trials. Prosecution activity continues to increase. Mr. Hughes said the Thomsen and Nybeck Law Firm has served as the City's prosecuting attorneys for about 25' years and have provided and continue to provide excellent prosecution services. Marsh Halberg, the lead prosecutor at the firm recently left to start his own criminal defense firm. adding this would be an appropriate time to solicit proposals. Mr. Hughes said if the Council wished to proceed, staff should be directed to prepare. and disseminate a Request for Proposals (RFP) to the legal community. Based on staff's experience with the RFP for outside auditors, it would be appropriate for the Council to appoint a two member committee for the purpose of evaluating the proposals when they were received. He presented a proposal recently completed by the City of Burnsville for Prosecution Services. Member Masica made a motion to prepare and disseminate proposals for soliciting prosecutorial services to the legal community. and appointing a two member committee, consisting of Council Member Swenson and Council Member Hulbert for the purpose of evaluating the proposals. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. TELEVISING PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS APPROVED Director Bennerotte indicated at the July 27, 2005, Planning Commission meeting, members were asked their opinion on whether the City should televise its meetings. The Commission did not indicate a preference. Members stated they would support whatever decision was made by the Council on this matter. Ms Bennerotte reported that of sixteen local cities surveyed, two did not televise their Planning Commission meetings. She noted that of the members of the Southwest Cable Commission, Edina was the only one that did not televise their Planning Commission meetings. She added no additional equipment would be necessary to videotape meetings. Staff costs would be approximately $150 per meeting or $1,800 per year. The proposed playback schedule would be at 7:00 P.M. Friday, 3:00 P.M. Sunday and 7:00 P.M. Tuesday for the two weeks following a meeting. Following a brief Council discussion, Member Swenson made a motion approving televising meetings of the Edina Planning Commission on the community's local government- access channel, EDINA 16. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 5 Minutes/Edina City Council/August 2, 2005 50TH & FRANCE REPORT PRESENTED Mr. Hughes indicated at the July 19th meeting he submitted a report on the 50th & France area for information only. He said the question presently was whether there should be another examination of the on -going policies in the 50th & France area. Mr. Hughes reminded the Council a number of studies were currently being conducted; the greater Southdale Study which was nearing completion, the Subdivision Massing Study that was beginning and the traffic study of a large portion of the northeast section that would include 50th & France. With all the studies that were on- going, he suggested evaluating the development controls that were in place to make sure they fit our needs. Member Swenson questioned whether the project boundaries were adequate. Planner Larsen elaborated that the project boundaries and the tax increment boundaries were the same. For the purposes of a planning study and why the boundaries were established as such, was a topic for study. Member Masica suggested waiting for the study until the 50th & France area development was closer to completion. Member Housh concurred that the area be evaluated further as well as such as Valley View /Wooddale, and 70th and Cahill. Mr. Hughes noted that the Valley View /Wooddale area just needs a small push to begin. The 70th & Cahill area has never gained the interest in redevelopment. Member Swenson asked for an update on the Valley View /Wooddale plan. Mr. Larsen noted that there were multiple objectives of the plan, including public spaces and private redevelopment. Member Swenson asked about density. Mr. Larsen said density would be considered when a proposal came forward. Mr. Hughes reiterated that the City had no plan in hand for the Valley View/ Wooddale area. Member Hulbert said a Comprehensive Plan was not necessary; all that was needed was a review by the Planning Commission defining the commercial area and what would be the most sensible use of the area. Member Hulbert made a motion directing the Planning Commission for examination of policies in place at 50th & France for purposes of density review, parking, and evaluation of the project boundary. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *RESOLUTION NO 2005 -64 - NO PARKING - WEST 58TH STREET, FROM CONCORD AVENUE TO WOODDALE AVENUE Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Swenson introducing the following resolution and moving its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2005-64 RELATING TO PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON S.A.P. NO. 120-143-02-07 (West 58th Street) Page 6 Minutes/Edina City Council/August 2, 2005 WHEREAS, the City of Edina has planned the improvements of MSAS 143 (West 58th Street) from Concord Avenue to Wooddale Avenue; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina will be expending Municipal Street Aid Funds on the improvement of this street, and WHEREAS, these improvements do not provide adequate width for parking on both sides of the street; and approval of the proposed construction as a Municipal State Aid Street project must therefore be conditioned upon certain parking restrictions. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS THEREBY RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina shall ban the parking of motor vehicles on MSAS 143 (West 581h Street) on both sides of the street from Concord Avenue to Wooddale Avenue, at all times. Passed and adopted this 2nd day of August 2005. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -65 - DESIGNATION OF THE NATIONAL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (POLICE DEPARTMENT) Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Swenson introducing the following resolution and moving its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2005-65 DESIGNATION OF THE NATIONAL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AS THE BASIS FOR ALL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT IN THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, the President of the United States of America issued Homeland Security Presidential Directive 5 to enhance the ability of the United States to manage domestic incidents by establishing a single, comprehensive national incident management system; and WHEREAS, the President, in Homeland Security Presidential Direction 5, tasked the secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to develop and administer a National Incident Management System: and WHEREAS, the secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security developed and administered the National Incident Management System (NIMS) to provide for interoperability and compatibility among federal, state, and local capabilities, the NIMS will include: a core set of concepts, principles, terminology, and technologies covering the incident command system, multi- agency coordination systems; unified command, training; identification and management of resources (including systems for classifying types of resources); qualifications and certification; and the collection, tracking, and reporting of incident information and incident resources; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty issued Executive Order 05 -02: DESIGNATION OF THE NATIONAL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (NIMS) AS THE BASIS FOR ALL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA; and WHEREAS, the collective input and guidance from all federal, state, local, and tribal homeland security partners has been, and will continue to be, vital to the development, effective implementation, and utilization of a comprehensive NIMS; and WHEREAS, it is necessary and desirable that all Edina agencies and personnel coordinate their efforts to effectively and efficiently provide the highest levels of incident management, and Page 7 r Minutes/Edina City Council/August 2, 2005 WHEREAS, the NIMS standardization procedures for managing personnel, communications, facilities, and resources will improve the ability of Edina to utilize federal funding to enhance local and state agency readiness, maintain first responder safety, and streamline incident management processes; and WHEREAS, the Incident Command System components of the NIMS are already an integral part of various incident management activities, throughout Edina, including current emergency management training programs; and WHEREAS,. the National Commission of Terrorist Actions (9 -11 Commission) recommended adoption of a standardized Incident Command System; and NOW, THEREFORE, we do hereby establish the National Incident Management System (NIMS) as the Edina standard for incident management. Adopted by the City of Edina on the 2nd day .of August, 2005. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *RESOLUTION NO 2005 -66 - SETTING HEARING DATE OF SEPTEMBER 6, 2005 - VACATION OF PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY AND UTILITY EASEMENTS HAUGLAND DEVELOPMENT Motion made by Member Housh and ,seconded by Member Swenson .introducing the following resolution and moving its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2005-66 CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF UTILITY DRAINAGE EASEMENT HAUGLAND DEVELOPMENT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina as follows: 1. It is hereby found and determined that the following described property should be considered for vacation in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 160.29 and 462.348, Subd. 7: 2. This Council shall meet at 7:00 P.M. on the 6th day of September 2005, for the purpose of holding a public hearing on whether such vacation shall be made in the interest of the public. 3. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause notice of said hearing to be published once a week for two weeks in the Edina Sun - Current, the official newspaper of the City, to post such notice, in at least three public and conspicuous places, as provided in Minnesota Statutes. Such notice shall be in substantially the following form: (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA 4801 WEST 50T" STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF UTILITY EASEMENT HAUGLAND DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY OF EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota will meet on September 6, 2005, at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers at 4801 West 50`h Street, to consider the vacation of the following utility easement: Page 8 Minutes/Edina City Council/August 2, 2005 Proposed Legal Description of a Utility Easement to be vacated: The West 10 feet of the East 56 feet of the South 42 feet of Lot 47, Auditor's Subdivision No. 172, according to the recorded copy thereof Also the West 10 feet of the East 56 feet of the North 3 feet of the South 193 feet of Lot 45, said Auditor's Subdivision No. 172. All persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether or not the above proposed utility easement vacation is in the public interest and shall be heard at said time and place. The Council shall consider the extent to which such proposed street vacation affects existing easements within the area of the proposed vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric, telephone or cable television poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed .vacation, to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto, for the purpose of specifying, in any such vacation resolution, the extent to which any or all of such easement, and such authority to maintain, and to enter upon the area of the proposed vacation, shall continue. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. POLICY APPROVED IN STREET PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SIGNS Assistant Engineer Lillehaug indicated in December 2004, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) approved the use of the In- Street Pedestrian Crossing Signs. The policy, as presented, would give guidance for the usage of the In- Street Pedestrian Crossing Sign in accordance with guidelines established by the Federal Highway Administration and supplemental guidelines established by the City to help manage the implementation of the signs. The policy was presented to the Transportation Commission on June 16, 2005, and was recommended for adoption on July 21, 2005. Mr. Lillehaug continued that currently, two locations that In -Street Pedestrian Crossing Signs were being used were in front of City Hall, and at 50th & France. Mr. Lillehaug presented an alternate (Option A) that includes an additional policy (Option B) allowing the sign to only be used seasonally due to safety issues and to prevent damage to the sign during the winter. The Commission recommended it was feasible, and warranted to use the signs during the winter months; however staff recommended adopting Option A and recommended Option B should not be adopted due to safety issues with using the sign during the winter. These issues include maintenance difficulties and safety issues during snow plowing operations, i.e. 1) the potential for increased ice and snow buildup in the crosswalk area around the in -street sign, and 2) an increase in the potential for damage to the sign during inclement winter driving conditions. Mr. Lillehaug noted that staff recommended adoption of Option A; the In -Street Pedestrian Crossing Sign Traffic Policy dated August 2, 2005. Page 9 Minutes/Edina City Council/August 2, 2005 Following a Council discussion, Member Masica made a motion approving adoption of Option A, the In- Street Pedestrian Crossing Sign Traffic Policy, dated August 2, 2005. Motion seconded by Member Hulbert. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION LICENSE AGREEMENT APPROVED - HAUGLAND DEVELOPMENT Mr. Hughes indicated on May 3, 2005, the Council approved a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for the redevelopment proposal of the Haugland Companies at 50th & France. The approval was granted conditioned upon "platting the property to incorporate all easements, vacations and dedications." Mr. Hughes said in order for this project to proceed in a logical fashion and allow the Haugland Company to secure construction financing, the HRA and the City need to take a number of actions prior to the approval of the final plat which will likely occur following the substantial completion of the project. This would be due largely to the fact that the plat will be "three dimensional" in nature in order to legally separate the condominium floors and garage from the retail level. Mr. Hughes said that accurate legal descriptions cannot be prepared until the building was in place. Upon review by the City attorneys, staff recommended the HRA and the City grant Haugland a license for construction activities on the alleyway that occupies the northerly part of the Arby's site. Mr. Hughes added the HRA should set a hearing date for September 6, 2005, for the purpose of conveying this alleyway to Haugland conditioned upon Haugland rededicating an alley easement back to the City upon completion. Mr. Hughes added that State law required a hearing prior to disposition of property by the HRA. The alley was acquired approximately 25 years ago. The HRA's ownership was three dimensional in nature in that the underlying property owner retained ownership of air rights above the alley. The conveyance of the alley to Haugland and Haugland's subsequent rededication of an alley easement back to the City will result in the City owning the same (although slightly reconfigured) alleyway as the HRA now owns. Staff recommends the City set a hearing date as well for September 6, 2005 to vacate various easements on the property. New easements will be rededicated to the City when the final plat was completed. Mr. Hughes displayed a graphic depicting the area and requested HRA action in granting Haugland Development a Temporary Construction License for construction and set a hearing date for transfer of HRA property and vacation of easements. Member Housh inquired what would be the scenario if the transfer did not happen because of the project not being completed. Attorney Gilligan stated that the easement over the area would not be designated until the plat was approved which would include rights protecting the City. He added that during the licensing period there were limits in place limiting the type of activities that can take place. Page 10 Minutes/Edina City Council/August 2, 2005 1 Member Housh made a motion approving issuance of a Temporary Construction License Agreement to Haugland Development, setting September 6, 2005, as hearing date for the Transfer of HRA Property. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Member Housh made a motion and Member Swenson seconded the motion approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated July 19, 2005, and consisting of 28 pages: General Fund $169,837.00; CDBG Fund $4,221.18; Communications Fund $4,591.67, Working Capital Fund $76,340.97, Construction Fund $374,408.64, Art Center Fund $3,851.74; Aquatic Center Fund $20,598.47, Golf Course Fund $20,186.50; Ice Arena Fund $7,894.95; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $4,750.68; Liquor Fund $254,495.51; Utility Fund $646,499.32, Storm Sewer Fund $154,705.24; Recycling Fund $33,874.00, PSTF Fund $1,385.02, TOTAL $1,777,640.89; and for approval of payment of claims dated July 27, 2005, and consisting of 40 pages: General Fund $388,124.66; Communications Fund $15,404.20, Working Capital Fund $34,200.,62; Construction Fund $2,151.67, Art Center Fund $18,797.59, Golf Dome Fund $372.53; Aquatic Center Fund $10,238.00; Golf Course Fund $61,646.46, Ice Arena Fund $8,166.10, Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $12,828.61; Liquor Fund $151,728.99, Utility Fund $57,518.37; Storm Sewer Fund $11,383.99; PSTF Agency Fund $242.60, TOTAL $772,804.39. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. RESOLUTION NO 2005 -68 CALLING FOR BOND SALE - AUGUST 16, 2005 - G.O. PULIC IMPROVEMENT BONDS Mr. Hughes presented a pre -sale report calling for the sale of $1,460,000 in General Obligation Public Improvement Bonds. Proceeds of the bonds would be used to pay for the assessable portion of street improvement projects that Council has authorized in the past year. Terms of the bonds were 10 years and the debt service would be paid by residential assessments that would be established in October. The bonds were still considered General Obligation bonds. Member Hulbert introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2005-68 Resolution Providing for the Sale of $1,460,000 G.O. Improvement Bonds, Series 2005E A. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, has heretofore determined that it is necessary and expedient to issue the City's $1,460,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2005E (the "Bonds "), to finance public improvements in the City; and B. WHEREAS, the City has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc., in Roseville, Minnesota ( "Ehlers "), as its independent financial advisor for the Bonds and is therefore authorized to solicit proposals in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2(9); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Page 11 Minutes/Edina Cif Council/August 2, 2005 1. Authorization; Findings. The City Council hereby authorizes Ehlers to solicit proposals for the sale of the Bonds. 2. Meeting, Proposal Opening. The City Council shall meet at 7:00 p.m. on August 16, 2005, for the purpose of considering sealed proposals for and awarding the sale of the Bonds. 3. Official Statement. In connection with said sale, the officers or employees of the City were hereby authorized to cooperate with Ehlers and participate in the preparation of an official statement for the Bonds and to. execute and deliver it on behalf of the City upon its completion. ADOPTED this 2nd day of August, 2005. Member Masica seconded the motion Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. CONCERN OF RESIDENT Arthur Brown, 4908 Sunnyside Road, stated he has a parking problem. Currently City Ordinance requires that vehicles may not be parked in front of residences for more than six hours. Edina ' Police have responded to twenty calls from a neighbor about cars parked over the six hour limit. He suggested an Ordinance Amendment allowing a 12 hour limit for parking in front of residences and 25 feet on either side of their property line. Mayor Hovland asked what happens with parking in the winter. Mr. Brown said with the ground frozen, they can park anywhere. Chief Siitari noted the issue has been before the Council on July 6, 2004, because of complaints received from a neighbor about cars parked on the street. He said the Ordinance has been around for a long time and was only enforced upon complaint. Complaints generally occur near commercial areas or. near rental housing. Street cleaning during the summer could become a balancing act with a 12 -hour overnight parking ordinance amendment. Member Swenson asked Mr. Brown how many cars they owned and if they all were running. Mr. Brown responded that they have seven and they all.were running. Mr. Hughes suggested that the Traffic Safety Committee look at the issue and come back to the Council with a recommendation at a regular Council meeting in September. Member Masica made a motion directing the Traffic Safety Committee look at the hours of parking ordinance and come back before the Council with a recommendation at a regular Council meeting in September. Member Hulbert seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 9:40 P.M. City Clerk Page 12 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # 1I.A. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE Consent ❑ City Engineer Information Only ❑ Date: August 16, 2005 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Vacation of Existing Utility Action Motion Easement: Lot 8, Block 1; ®ReSOlutlOn Danijohn's Addition ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Vacate a portion of existing utility easement, on Lot 8, Block 1, Danijohn's Addition. Info /Background: The owner of the property located at 5532 Vernon Avenue requests the proposed partial vacation of the existing utility easement. The owner needs to reconstruct the existing garage. The location of the home in relation to the westerly property line does not provide enough space for a two -car garage without encroaching into the existing 5- foot easement, see attached sketch. The City of Edina Utilities, Centerpoint Energy, Xcel Energy, Qwest, and Time Warner Cable do not object to this vacation. Staff recommends the vacation be approved. I � , Easement Vacation w o e= 5532 Vernon Avenue o City of Edina 20 IAPA N W+ E S 10 0 20 F PUBLIC HEARING FOR - VACATING- UTI6IFY -- EASEMENT 5532 VERNON AVENUE OO CITY OF EDINA Vacation Area i 2- Proposed Vacation Area t �Q� 1 ,a�'rl CITY OF CDINA History: • Danijohn's Addition platted in 1961. • Typical 5 -foot utility easement at perimeter of subdivision. • Homeowner reconstructing garage. Qr CITY Oi COI14A Utility Information: • Edina Utilities, Centerpoint Energy, Qwest, Time Warner, and Xcel Energy do not object to vacation. G� CU CITV OR ,:ZA Staff Recommendation: • Vacate portion of utility easement to accommodate new garage. 2 a 6 �9ZNA, �l ok e rd 1 08 e 0 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor and Council From: Craig Larsen City Planner Date: August 16, 2005 Subject: Preliminary Rezoning Preliminary Plat and Amendment to Coma Plan Riverview Commercial Properties, 50,n Street & Indianola Avenue Agenda Item # III.A. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends: 1. Amend Comprehensive Plan by adding the north 28 feet of 5017 Indianola Avenue to High Density Residential. 2. Preliminary Rezoning for above parcel, and redevelopment plan. 3. Preliminary Plat Approval 4. Lot width and lot area variance for single dwelling lot. 5. Vacation of alley right -of -way. INFO /BACKGROUND: Refer to: Staff report and plan sent out with August 2, packet. See attached draft Planning Commission minutes and correspondence. o DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION :MEETING MINUTES JULY 27, 2005 MEMBERS PRESENT: Byron, Schroeder, Fischer, Lonsbury, McClelland, Runyan and Workinger S -05-3 Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Plat Z -05 -1 & Riverview Commercial Properties,�LC Amendment to 4121 50 St West and, 5017 Indianola A enue Comp Plan � Mr. Larsen informed the Commis i"tbe ubjec t pr�peTQes are located on the southeast corner of the intersectio7f Indapola Avenue and West 50 Street. The property owner propose to remov the existing, 9 -unit apartment building and 9 -stall parkin garage located at 1 st 6 Street, realign property lines (4121 W 50, St & 501 Igr�diancla) /betw en,the parcels and construct a new 6 -unit condon�ium b6ildin . �._ Mr. Larsen conclud ,pd -staff believes thrskpropo�al has merits. The plan needs several variances; it replaces a building that-rs also non - conforming in regard to density, building s tback; parking and lot coverage. Maintaining the single dwe ling "lot% -the sout'f the new building preserves the relationship betweeultr- family and single family land uses. Mr. Larsen stated Staff assu es that the -new home`built on�the balance of the existing lot will be constructed without variances.,\Staff recommends the following actions: change th land, use designation`gf the northerly 28 feet of 5021 Indianola Avenue from ,Single Dwelling to High Density Residential, Rezone the same parcel from R -1 to PRp -4 , Preliminary Plat, Lot width and lot area variance for the single dwelling lot and cation of�alley right of way: The prroponents,�r. Chris Cowen, Mr. Dean DoVolis and Mr. John Wanninger were,present to.respond to questions. Mr. Cowen toil the Commission it is the goal of the development team to create a high quality, one level living experience close to retail facilities and other amenities. Mr. Cowen explained the six units will range in size from 2,700 to 3,500 square feet. Mr. Cowen said in his opinion the proposed building will enhance the streetscape and will possess a more residential feel then the existing apartment building. Mr. Cowen introduced Mr. Dean DoVolis, architect for the project. Mr. DoVolis, 5009 Ridge Road, Edina, MN addressed the Commission and with photos pointed out the existing conditions of the site. Mr. DoVolis explained one of the goals for this project is to retain as many trees as possible, and it is believed only two significant trees will be lost as a result of razing the present building and constructing a new building. Mr. DoVolis reviewed the floor plans of the proposed units and informed the Commission the building will provide 2.16 enclosed parking stalls per unit (above code requifements) which is one reason the building encroaches father south. Continuing, Mry�DoVolis said the site will also contain 4 surface guest parking spa ce`s:�Mr, DoVolis explained as mentioned previously by Mr. Cowen the b iiding'will (nave a residential feel with exterior materials including stone, wood shakes, copper;'"ers,,bays `� 1 gables and fireplaces. All landscaping will meet or e�ceed' codes ndards, j adding the development tem is working with residents of`the Henley (d.rectly� east) to formulate a landscaping plan between stivctures. \ Commissioner Runyan asked Mr between the Henley and the proposed r structures there is roughly 30+ feet. i Mr. DoV,.olis to again explain how many ilt ofAhis project. „Mr. DQVolis responded he fro directly due to redevelopment and one ilis reiterated_it.is important to the mature trees as possible. ;d Mr. DoVolis to point out the guest parking )mmission guests will park at the same eway entrance /exit (off Indianola). )ovoli4,if he believes snow storage will be Commissiner Schroeder as substantial trees will be lost as a n believes three large trees will be'l't tree to Dutch elm disease. Mr DE development team to retain.a� ma Commissioner W area. Mr. Do .olis_indicE elevatio"f the garage - Commissioner Workinge area,, Mr. a the DoVolis if he know r the distance ,w building. Mr. DoVolis said between ils sard,he believes snow storage would not be Chairman Byron questioned if a side walk is proposed along the west boundary line Mr. DoVolis said that option is being left open. He stated if it is the wis"f the Commission to have a sidewalk in this location that could be accomplish,. 'd, Chairman'Byron acknowledged he is not certain if there is a sidewalk along �that side of Indianola, adding if there is, it may be a good idea to continue the side�nralk to 5,01h Street. Ms. Mimi Rohlfsen, 5025 Indianola Avenue asked Mr. DoVolis if a new house is constructed at 5017 Indianola Avenue would the new house be "overly large.” Mr. DeVoils said a new house would be designed to blend in with the existing homes along Indianola and not be overly large. Continuing, Mr. DoVolis explained he is an urban architect and has designed homes for lots under 50 feet 2 in width. Ms. Rohlfsen thanked Mr. DeVoils and questioned if a builder has been retained. Mr. DeVoils responded at this time a builder hasn't been chosen. Commissioner McClelland questioned Mr. Larsen on the reason for the rezoning if the use remains the same. Mr. Larsen explained a strip of land behind the existing apartment building (and house to the south) needs to be vacated and replatted with the apartment site. This strip,of land is zoned R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District and contains a vacated alley ways" a portion of 5017 Indianola Avenue triggering the reason for the rezoning fror"A to PRD, Planned Residence District. Commissioner McCWIanc \ sked Mr,,Larsen if he knows the width of the other lots along Indianola. Mr. Larsen said he believes the lot widths range in size from 50 to 75 feet. Co nmissiner,"M Clelland�sai 'sl was pleased to see fewer condo units. She added she worries ab ut over building and massing. �� % Commissioner Workinger asked Mr. Larsen NJ evide6t, -the PRD-4 district is in this area. Mr. Lrasen responded the PRD-4 district o�tinues #o the Henley (directly east), around the corner to The Laiitems ;,Regency a d the newer 8 -unit building on France Avenue. � 11\.\, 1„% Commissioner Fischer told th ' Commission ae has no-4sues with the design of the proposed building, add g it'appears to {e tastefully done. Commissioner Fischer informe0-the Commission he s# on -the Affordable Housing Task Force commenffiing that while: he understands this project, he wanted the Commission tofnote toe City is lq ing an affordable housing element. Continuing, Commissioner Fischer noted this project- requires variances to achieve less housing. C missioner Fischer wondered if some type of fee could be added to an-- application (such as this) with the fee earmarked for affordable housing�Concluding, Commissioner Fischer said in his opinion the City should develoo an affordable housing policy to facilitate development of new and redev6lopment of e5dging multi - resider al buildings. Commissioner Fischer acknowledged due to the\cons6aints of the site and low unit number (six) it would b � unrealistic to require aff 7 rdabl? housing for this project. Commissioner Schroeder stated he agrees with the comments from Comrissioner Fischer wi�hi/regard to affordable housing. Commissioner Schroeder�a ked ILL Ler§en ifne believes the building could be redesigned to comply with ordnance requirements. He pointed out multiple variances are requested. Mr. L-a\rsen responded that in his opinion it would be difficult to redevelop this site vv' isiodt variances. He pointed out the subject site and building is already non - conforming. Chair Byron asked Mr. Cowen if he believes the house planned for the adjacent lot can be constructed without variances. Mr. Cowen said it is the desire of the development team to construct the new home without variances. Mr. Cowen deferred to Mr. DoVolis. Mr. DoVolis told the Commission he designs 3 many homes for lots much smaller than the subject site. He pointed out in Minneapolis a majority of the lots are 40 feet in width, sometimes less. Chair Byron stated he is confident a home could be designed for this lot without the need of variances. Mr. DoVolis added at final approval firm house design plans will be submitted. Commissioner Schroeder asked if a comfort level �could be achieved with regard to the multitude of variances needed to redevel6p'thisJsite,,, Mr. Larsen explained when staff was approached for redeve�pmgnt of finis site it was felt that it was very important to ensure that enclosed parkin demands were met. Mr. Larsen added this "demand" forced a larger footprin �oward the`south. Mr. Larsen said it is not unrealistic to ask if six units are too ma�y;�l�owever;.wn one looks at our ordinance it relates better to� suburban environment not an f urban environment such as this. Mr. Larsen said it is possible the code, hasp' acknowledged its urban element. Commissioner Fischer asked if the Cit has an ap 'propriate zoning plan for urban redevelopment. Mr. Larsen responded Edina's ordinances apply to all districts, regardless of their location. Mr. Larsen acknowledge81here are some unique areas in the City that presently would 6b considered non - conforming by our current code. It I Commissioner Lonsburycommented,#hat'the proposed new building will be taller then the existing building and aske� if the _de'veloper considered going farther south with the buildng,and not retaining the single family home. Mr. DoVolis said it was impogant to retain a single-family/home on this lot to ensure the transition from multi - family residential to single family residential remains the same. Mr. DoYous said retai b2lbd the\single family home status makes sense and creates a. ce rhythm to.the k. Chair-Byron said in his opinion that speaks to a comimliment to the single - family n ighborhood. M /!Steve Farsht,�5 21 Indianola venue told the Commission he had some concerns with regard to this proposal but was surprised and impressed the proponents listened to how important is was to him to retain the single family home to his north; continuing, Mri Farsht added he believes when the existing home rsrazed the newly constructed home will meet ordinance standards and be a benefit tathe block., Commissioner McClelland states she sympathizes with statements from the new Commissioned .,regarding this rezoning, adding it is possible that in the past the Commission and Council should have considered altering the zoning requirements (including density, setbacks, etc) for our more urban areas. Commissioner McClelland acknowledged they were slow to recognize the redevelopment restraints that exist in these areas. Commissioner McClelland said on her part she tends to (and still does) view these areas as "redevelopment zones ". Continuing, Commissioner McClelland said she also agrees with 4 comments from other Commissioners that something needs to be done to incorporate an affordable housing policy as we view development and redevelopment proposals. Commissioner McClelland stated in this instance she believes that affordable housing is not an option but feels there are other areas in the City where some type of framework could guide the Commission when reviewing development and redevelopment projects. Concluding, Commissioner McClelland states she can support this proposal under;the terms of redevelopment. Commissioner Workinger commented proposed building was. a bit awkward, but the architectural elements appear to support the the mass of the structure will be "broken up" provide a more residential flavor to the buildi at,firstie felt the height of the )df ctiohs of differing_ Jonal'heighIt:-\,He pointed oUt,._ ese different elements and wit id site.' Commissioner Lonsbury acknowledged this ai unique, adding he has less trouble considering this p would if a project requiring as many varia s were. E "suburban" areas of the City. Commissi ner Lonsbu opinion, the proposed building seems fit- andsn't i IN com 'City is completely 3vorably then he in our pore nted:'in his Commissioner Runyan stated�he can support t proposal as submitted and moved to recommend Prel'minarjY.,Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, Final Development Plan and Amendment to the Comprehefisiye Plan subject to: change in land use designation of the northerly 28 feet Of 5017 Indianola Avenue from Single Dwelling to H)gh Density Residential,__Rezone the same parcel from R -1, Single Dwelling Unitgistnctto\PRD -4, Planned Residence District -4, Preliminary Pjatrand lot width\ and lot,-area variance for the single dwelling lot and vacation alley right -of -way. Commissioner McClelland seconded the motion. All votedaye; ,rr tion carried \ iir Byron said,- t this time the Commission should take the opportunity that a plan be�eveloped to guide future development and nent in Edina with regard to affordable housing. ~`Commissioner Fischer thanked Chair Byron for that comment and said it appears to\ iim that-the ,C'ommission is very much in agreement in creating a development'tgol to ad'dressiaffordable housing. Commissioner Workinger asked Mr. Larsen if the Comprehensive Plan contains an affordableiiousing element. Mr. Larsen responded it does, adding 25 years ago the City studied affordable housing and designated certain vacant sites for development of affordable housing. Those sites are now developed; adding 25 years later vacant land in Edina is very difficult to come by. Mr. Larsen said it is not unrealistic to suggest that a "redevelopment framework" is needed to address affordable housing. Commissioner Workinger questioned if the Council 5 could consider "affordable overlay districts" and designate certain areas as good locations for "affordable housing" if redeveloped. Commissioner Workinger added he understands there will be development limitations and pointed out when the City rezoned the Wallingford site (70th & Metro) it was able to secure some affordable housing on that site. Mr. Larsen agreed, adding that approach would be an option. Commissioner Fischer told the Commission the Affordable Housing Task Force is trying to formulate guidelines, adding it is a start and he believes the Task Force is heading in the right direction. Commissioner Workinger commented if certain areas had an "afford 6" oveday,�designation the "affordable" issue could at least be addres fed if,redeyelopment in those areas were to occur. t Commissioner Lonsbury suggested they possibility of a monetary fee (as r previously mentioned) similar to the Parkland De�dicatioWfee the CityY.pquires from developers /property owners for residential,subdivisions., This fee co be placed in a fund to facilitate affordable housing.` %\ Chair Byron stated this is a good start, adding the Council will -read our comments. % �`�. i M f i i" i M To: Edina Planning Commission From: Nancy F. Strom 5005 Arden Avenue Edina, MN, 55424 I attended the Board Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission on Tuesday, July 26, 2005. I was specifically interested in hearing the deliberations of the board concerning the proposed redevelopment of the apartment building at 4121 W 50th Street and the adjacent house at 5017 Indianola Avenue. However, I was also interested in general in the proceedings of the Board because I have felt for some time that the character of "Old Edina" is suddenly changing in a way that I feel is unfortunate. I was very gratified that there were quite a few issues about the apartment building/house development that concerned the commission members. I felt there was thoughtful discussion on those issues. However, a number of other issues concern me including: 1. The apartment building on 50'b Street as it now exists is in balance with the present neighborhood - -- not only in size but in affordability. 2. The new home at 5021 Indianola Avenue developed and built by Chris Cowen/ R.C.P.Inc. is out of proportion to the rest of the neighborhood, and that would seem to already indicate a lack of sensitivity to neighboring homeowners. Would that be the direction of planning by that same developer/builder for the new condominium building and the new single - family home - - -or any other property that would be available in the future? 3. I am increasingly feeling that some homeowners who do not want to live in the outer suburbs "never- the -less" desire a home that might be appropriate in that setting but choose to build that type of home in our semi -urban setting, where it is not appropriate. Those of us who desire a less pretentious home - - -- as were built in the 1940s - -- must be confronted by these new homes that are completely out of character with the existing neighborhood and "dwarf' their neighbors' homes. 4. It is realistic to assume that architects, developers and builders are in the business of earning a living and are not primarily concerned with the "Common Good ". I feel it is then important for citizens and designated institutions to be concerned with that common good. Whether we have that right to determine standards and restrictions is naturally determined by what is already "on the books" or by what will be "on the books" in the future. Thank you for the work you are doing. Thank you, also, for taking note of my concerns -- -- -which may already be your concerns. Nancy Strom R R o e ,aea REPORURECOMMENDATION To: Mayor Hovland and members of the Edina City Council. From: John Keprios, Direct Park & Recreation Dep nt Date: ' August 16, 2005 Subject: Ordinance No. 2005 -8 Edina Art Center Board Agenda Item IV. A. Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends To HRA ® To Council ❑ .Motion ❑ Resolution ® Ordinance ❑ Discussion RECOMMENDATION: Approve proposed Edina Ordinance No. 2205 -8; an ordinance amending the City Code by adding a new Section 1221 — Art Center Board. INFO/BACKGROUND: At the July 19, 2005, meeting, the Council received a report, testimony, and recommendation regarding formalization of the Edina Art Center Board and the Edina Public Art Committee. After deliberation, the Council passed the following motion: "Approve the proposal that the Edina Art Center Board become a formalized independent advisory board of the City Council, by directing staff to prepare an ordinance amendment; and that the Edina Art Center Board be comprised of not more than three regional member; and that the Edina Public Art Committee be a standing committee appointed by and subordinate to the Edina Art Center Board." Therefore, attached to this report is the proposed new ordinance as directed by the Council. Staff also recommends waiver of second reading to adopt the new ordinance. al EDINA ORDINANCE NO. 2005-8 An Ordinance Amending the City Code by Adding a New Section 1221— Art Center Board THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. The City Code is hereby amended by adding a new Section 1221 as follows: "Section 1221 —Art Center Board 1221.01 Establishment. The Council, finding that the encouragement and enhancement of the arts in Edina is vital to the social and cultural well being of the City and its residents, does hereby establish the Art Center Board (the "Board'). 1221.02 Duties. The Board shall: A. Make recommendations regarding the operation of the Edina Art Center. B. Plan and recommend to the Council art activities and programs. C. Develop a long term plan directed towards fulfilling the needs and desires of Edina residents with respect to the arts. D. Recommend programs at the Edina Art Center that are responsive to community desires. E. Periodically report to the Council on matters pertaining to the Art Center and public art in Edina. F. Initiate and oversee fundraising activities that benefit the Art Center and public art in Edina. G. Represent the City at community functions pertaining to the visual arts and with similar bodies and organizations involved with the visual arts. H. Oversee the development and implementation of a public visual arts program in Edina. I. Perform other duties from time to time directed by the Council. 1221.03 Membership. The Board shall consist of eleven members appointed by the Mayor with the consent of the majority of the Council. One member of the Board may be a high school student. All members of the Board shall be residents of the City except that not more than three members may be non - residents. Members shall be appointed for a term of three years except the student member shall be appointed for a one year term. Members shall serve until a successor has been appointed. Upon termination of a member's term, that member's successor shall be appointed for the remainder of such term. Members of the Board shall serve without compensation and may resign voluntarily or be removed by a majority vote of the Council pursuant to Section 180 of this Code. Board members who discontinue legal residency in the City may be removed from office by the Mayor with the consent of a majority of the Council. 1221.04 Meetings. All meetings of the Board shall be open to the public, be governed by Robert's Rules of Order, and otherwise be held pursuant to its bylaws. The Board shall hold its regular meetings on such fixed date and in such fixed place as it from time to time shall determine. The minutes of all meetings shall be recorded and a copy thereof transmitted to each member of the Council. 1221.05 Organization. The Board shall: A. Elect from its members a chair and vice chair. B. Adopt such bylaws as shall be necessary or desirable for conduct of its business. C. Appoint a secretary from its membership or request that a staff secretary be furnished by the City. Additional staff may be assigned to the Board by the Manager. 1221.06 Committees. The Board shall establish and appoint members to a Public Art Committee which shall be charged with establishing and implementing a public arts program in the City. The Public Art Committee shall be chaired by a member of the Board who shall be appointed by the Board chair with the consent of the Board. The Board may establish other committees for the purpose of carrying out other Board duties. Section 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: to TO: Mayor & City Council REQUEST FOR PURCHASE FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, City Engineer VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15.000 DATE: August 16, 2005 AGENDA ITEM V. A. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Contract No. ENG 05 -12, Schaefer Circle Street & Utility Improvements, Improvement Nos. A -217, SS -419, STS -303 & WM-443 Comaanv 1. Penn Contracting, Inc. 2. Bituminous Roadways, Inc. 3. G. F. Jedlicki, Inc. 4. G. L. Contracting, Inc. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Penn Contracting, Inc. Amount of Quote or Bid $ 178,948.00 $ 190,425.00 $ 193,425.00 $ 238,970.40 $ 178,948.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This project is for street and utility improvements-on Schaefer Circle cul -de -sac. This project includes reconstructing the existing roadway, adding City - watermain and fire hydrant, upgrading the existing sanitary sewer and storm sewer system. A project public hearing was held on May 17, 2005, where the City Council ordered the project. The residents have submitted a petition for concrete curb and gutters only if they are paid out of the City Storm Sewer Utility Fund, see Council Agenda Item VI. C. and Item VIII. A. Staff issued an addendum, prior to opening the bids, calling for an alternate for a curb and gutter addition. This bid reflects the base bid along with the alternate. The Contractor, Dean Luxenburg of Penn Contracting, Inc. has agreed to delete this alternate if the City Council does not adopt the proposed Assessment Policy. This project will be funded by special assessments and respective utility funds. The Feasibility Study cost estimate for the special assessments that did not include utility upgrades or concrete curb and gutter, was $63,200; the low bid reflects $60,670 for the special assessment amount. Staff recommends awarding the proiect to Penn Contracting. Inc. Signature The Recommended Bid is within budget not within budget Gordon Public Works - Engineering Wallin, Finance Director City Manager TO: Mayor & City Council REQUEST FOR PURCHASE FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, City Engineer VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15.000 DATE: • August 16, 2005 AGENDA ITEM V. B. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Contract No. ENG 05 -8, West 58th Street Improvements, Improvement Nos. BA -328, SS -424, STS -304 & WM -444, L-45 Company 1. Midwest Asphalt Corporation 2. Hardrive, Inc 3. Bituminous Roadways, Inc. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Midwest Asphalt Corporation GENERAL INFORMATION: Amount of Quote or Bid $ 424,014.18 $ 424,052.33 $ 438,399.45 $ ' 424,014.18 This project is for street and utility improvements on West 58th Street, from Concord Avenue to Wooddale Avenue. This project includes reconstructing the existing roadway, adding concrete curb and gutter, adding a sidewalk along the northerly side of the roadway, adding decorative lighting, rehabilitating the watermain and sanitary sewer, and upgrading the storm sewer system. A project public hearing was held on February 15t', where the City Council ordered the project. This project will be funded using Municipal State Aid System funds, special assessments and utility funds. The Feasibility Study cost estimate for the special assessments that did not include utility upgrades, was $71,400; the low bid reflects $65,600 for the special assessment amount. The Engineer's estimate for the project is $516,017.90. Staff recommends awarding the project to Midwest Asphalt Corporation. Signiture The Recommended Bid is within budget not within budget Hughes, Public Works - Engineering allin, Finance Director Manager TO: Mayor & City Council REQUEST FOR PURCHASE FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, City Engineer VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15.000 DATE: August 16, 2005 AGENDA ITEM V. C. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Contract No. PW 05-4, Asphalt Roof Replacement Water Treatment Plant No. 1, 4521 West 50th Street, Improvement Nos. WM-452 Companv 1. Hunerberg Construction Company 2. E. R. Berwald Roofing Company, Inc. 3. Ebert, Inc. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Hunerberg Construction Company GENERAL INFORMATION: Amount of Quote or Bid $ 27,900.00 $ 30,280.00 $ 45,720.00 $ 27,900.00 This project is for the roof replacement on Treatment Plane No 1 located at 4521 West 50th Street. The existing roof is a built -up asphalt roof; the proposed roof will be an architectural asphalt shingle roof. The existing roof leaks due to the built -up portions separating. This project is part of the Capital Improvement Plan and will be funded through -the water utility fund. The CIP budgeted $30,000 for this project. Staff recommends awarding this project to Hunnerberg Construction Company. ignature The Recommended Bid is within budget not within Public Works - Utilities Q Ilin, Finance Director Manager To: Mayor & City Council From: Debra Mangen City Clerk ° Date: August 16, 2005 Subject: Noodles & Company New Wine and 3.2 Beer Liquor Licenses REPORURECOMMENDATION Agenda Item VI.A. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Motion approving Wine and 3.2 Beer Liquor Licenses to The Noodle Shop Company Minnesota, Inc. dba Noodles & Company, for the period beginning August 17, 2005, 2005 and ending March 31, 2006. Info /Background: The Noodle Shop Company Minnesota, Inc. made application for new Wine and 3.2 Beer liquor licenses to operate a new restaurant, Noodles & Company, to be located at 6531 York Avenue. They have filed the necessary' paperwork and paid the applicable fees for a license. The Planning Department has reviewed the application and finds that it complies with code requirements. The Health Department is satisfied with the applicants' plan for storage and service. The Police Department has completed their investigation and with no negative findings. Attached is Sgt. Stroh's memo stating the findings of the background investigation. The licenses are placed on the agenda for consideration by the Council. BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION SUMMARY ON -SALE INTOXICATING LIQUOR OR ON -SALE WINE LICENSE Establishment: The Noodle Shop Company Minnesota Inc. License: ' On -Sale Wine & 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor On June 13, 2005, The Noodle Shop Company Minnesota Inc., dba Noodles & Company, made application to the City of Edina for an On -Sale Wine & 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor license. The required alcohol awareness training has yet to be completed. The Noodle Shop Company Minnesota Inc.is incorporated in the State of Minnesota. The Minnesota Secretary of State reports they are in good standing. Noodle's & Company is the 100% share holder of The Noodle Shop Company Minnesota Inc. Noodle's & Company is incorporated in the state of Delaware. The Delaware Secretary of State reports they are in good standing. Director of The Noodle Shop Company Minnesota Inc: Aaron Stuart Kennedy Boulder, CO The director has been investigated and found to have noncriminal record. Checks were made with the following agencies. NCIC MINCIS Hennepin County Minnesota Secretary of State Minnesota Liquor Control Board Personal, business and bank references were contacted and responded positively. From the information gathered during the course of the investigation, I found nothing to prevent The Noodle Shop Company Minnesota Inc from obtaining an On -Sale Wine & 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor license. I would support a positive recommendation from the Police Department in regard to the issuance of this license. 3 �- Sgt. Steve Stroh 034 m REPORURE C OMMENDATION To: Mayor Hovland and members of the Edina City Council. From: John Keprios, Direct r Park & Recreation Dep ent Date: August 16, 2005 Subject: Todd Park Hockey Rink Proposal Park Board Recommendation Agenda Item VI. B. Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance Discussion RECOMMENDATION: The Park Board recommends that an outdoor hockey rink be built at Todd Park in place of the worn hockey rink that was removed at Countryside Park. INFO/BACKGROUND: 0 At the March 8, 2005, Park Board meeting, the Park Board discussed staff's recommendation to remove the outdoor hockey rink at Countryside Park and build a second P outdoor hockey rink at Lewis Park in time for the 2005/2006 outdoor winter skating season. ' Staff made this recommendation because the hockey rink boards at Countryside Park were beyond repair and needed to be removed. In addition, the outdoor hockey rink lights at Countryside Park are also in need of repair. The hockey rink at Countryside Park is currently in the wrong orientation (east/west, as opposed to north/south). Because of the improper orientation, the ice along the long north side of the rink significantly deteriorates earlier in the season than other rinks due to penetrating sun light. As a result, the Countryside Park hockey rink becomes unsafe for use almost two ,or three weeks earlier than all other outdoor hockey rinks in the park system. In addition, we have learned through the years that the sub -grade has a condition that causes part of the ice to melt prematurely. The cause of that condition remains a mystery. Staff suggested to the Park Board that it would be a mistake to invest thousands of dollars to simply replace the hockey boards at Countryside Park and build a new replacement rink and repair the outdoor lighting with the rink in the wrong orientation. The Park Board agreed with staff's recommendation to not invest the resources to place a hockey rink back at Countryside Park in the wrong orientation. To further complicate the issue, it has long been staff's view that Countryside Park needs a. new park master plan. In staff's view, this heavily scheduled park should have a parking lot centrally located within the park near major park amenities. To relocate the hockey rink within Countryside Parkin the proper north/south orientation would require a total park redesign. The Countryside Park neighborhood has not been solicited for input on this issue mainly because the decision has been made to' not place a rink back in the wrong orientation. However, residents will be notified and requested to be part of a master plan study that.could result in placement of a hockey rink back at Countryside Park in the proper orientation. At their March 8`h meeting, the Park Board passed a motion to build an outdoor hockey rink back at Todd Park. The Park Board agreed with staff's recommendation to mail - notices to the Todd Park neighborhood and invite them to attend the May 10`h Park Board meeting and/or submit their input to the Park Board via the Park and Recreation Director. Copies of emails and petition are attached to this report. The Edina Hockey Association (EHA) President, Mike Wagner, and EHA Ice Coordinator Steve Helgren attended the April 12`h Park Board meeting. They voiced their concern that due to outdoor hockey rink ice time demands, the City of Edina should continue to - maintain a minimum of eleven (11) outdoor hockey rinks during the winter months. EHA has over 1,200 youth enrolled in their organized hockey program. They also expressed a desire to have more reliable quality outdoor ice; which lead to their recommendation for the Park Board to consider adding a second outdoor hockey rink at Lewis Park; however, study the feasibility of installing artificial refrigeration and maintain the rinks with an ice - resurfacing machine. The Park Board agreed to the concept with the understanding that the EHA would pay for a feasibility study to determine if the concept would work at Lewis Park. I generated a Request For Proposal (RFP) to study the feasibility of placing artificial refrigeration at Lewis Park in a second outdoor hockey rink, as well as, building a covered roof over the new rink, plus the feasibility of using an ice - resurfacing machine to maintain the rink (or possibly both outdoor rinks). A copy of the RFP is attached to this report. Over a dozen consulting firms were sent the RFP; and seven responded with proposals. The lowest bid was $7,500 to complete the study. EHA has agreed to pay for the study; however, they have chosen to delay the study pending the outcome of this issue. On April 7, 2005, we mailed notices (copy of memo included in this report) to 294 households nearest Todd Park. The memo informed the neighbors what the Park Board was considering as a recommendation to the Council and requested community input on that recommendation. As a result, I have received emails (copies attached to this report) and a petition from the neighborhood. At the May 101h Park Board meeting, the Park Board chose to delay their final decision until the June Park Board meeting because there was concern whether quality outdoor ice could be attainable at Todd Park due to a high water table within the park. Park Superintendent Vince Cockriel attended the June 14`h Park Board meeting. Taken directly from the Park Board meeting minutes: "Mr. Cockriel informed the Park Board that the turf underneath the ice at Todd Park has absolutely nothing to do with the quality of ice. He noted that 3/< of his staff have been doing this for more than 20 years and they actually prefer Todd Park to Weber, Strachauer, Cornelia School or Creek Valley. He added that all of those parks have high water tables; however, the one thing Todd Park has that the others don't is better drainage. Therefore, making a good sheet of ice at Todd Park is absolutely no issue whatsoever." s� At their June 14th meeting, after much deliberation, the Park Board voted to recommend building a permanent structure hockey rink back at Todd Park. A copy of the not yet approved June 14`h Park Board meeting minutes are attached to this report. On Wednesday, July 13,.I met with Edina Hockey Association President Mike Wagner and EHA Ice Coordinator Steve Helgren in my office to discuss a facilities strategy that best meets their program needs. Mr. Wagner and Mr. Helgren expressed that quality reliable outdoor ice is more important than adding more outdoor hockey rinks to the park system. They stated that EHA would prefer that the City of Edina spend its outdoor hockey rink resources on developing another outdoor hockey rink at Lewis Park rather than at Todd Park for the 2005 -2006 season. The EHA would like to pursue the opportunity to have two outdoor hockey rinks at Lewis Park that are both maintained by an outdoor ice resurfacing machine, which would be the additional Zamboni currently stored at Braemar Arena. Based this input from the EHA coupled with the numerous residents who strongly oppose an outdoor hockey rink at Todd Park, I asked Park Board Chairman George Klus to consider a special Park Board meeting in July to reconsider their position on the matter and be sure that their recommendation is based on knowing all of the facts. Park Board Chairman George Klus agreed to hold a special meeting in the Council Chambers on Tuesday, July 26th,at 7:00 p.m. Residents were not informed of this meeting; however, several residents attended and some shared their views regarding the issue. Edina Hockey Association President Mike Wagner and EHA Ice Coordinator Steve Helgren also attended the meeting and shared with the Park Board that ERA's main concern is to not have a net loss in the total number of maintained outdoor hockey rinks. After much deliberation, the Park Board chose not to change their earlier recommendation to build a hockey rink at Todd Park. The Park Board agreed with staff's recommendation to flood a general skating area and a small hockey only area without boards (shinny hockey) at Countryside Park for the 2005- 2206 outdoor ice skating season. With the Park Board's recommendation, there will continue to be 11 outdoor hockey rinks maintained by the Park Maintenance Department: Northwest quadrant (3) • Todd Park • Highlands Park • Walnut Ridge Park Southwest quadrant (3) • Creek Valley Park • Lewis Park • Normandale Park Northeast quadrant (4) • Arden Park • Pamela Park • Strachauer Park • Weber Park Southeast quadrant (1) • Cornelia School Park I applaud the Park Board for choosing not to place an outdoor hockey rink back at Countryside Park in the wrong orientation. We have learned over the years that we are unable to maintain quality ice at that location which suggests that it is not financially prudent to spend tax dollars to replace that hockey rink in the wrong orientation. From a staff perspective, my main concern about this recommendation is our ability to maintain more than 11 outdoor hockey rinks in the future without having adequate manpower resources to meet expectations. The Edina Park Maintenance Department continues to be short one full -time park maintenance worker due to a retirement in 2003 that was never reinstated. With the current manpower in place, we can continue to maintain 11 outdoor hockey rinks, which would allow us to maintain a new hockey rink at Todd Park in place of the one that was removed at Countryside Park. My concern is that once a hockey rink is built at Todd Park, any additional outdoor hockey rinks added to the system at a later date would require more manpower. In other words, if a hockey rink is built at Todd Park in 2005, then adding a hockey rink back at Countryside Park or adding another rink at Lewis Park in the future will require additional manpower. My staff and I support more outdoor hockey rinks for the community as long as we are provided adequate resources to maintain ice to a quality standard that meets or exceeds our customers' expectations. ° Edina Park and Recreation Park Name: T. LEA TODD PARK Location: 4429 Vandervork Avenue Park Classification: Neighborhood Park Acres: 33.97 Description: This park was formerly named Division and Rutledge Park. It was later renamed in honor of T. Lea Todd, who was the President of the Village Council from 1944 to 1945. Mr. Todd was a member of the City Planning Commission from 1943 to 1945 and from 1953 to 1968. He served as chairman of this commission.from 1956 to 1967. A hard surface area, new playground equipment, and a hockey rink with a portable warming house were constructed in 1968. A new sun shelter was installed in 1978. The hockey rink was discontinued in 1983. New playground equipment was installed in 1985. The tennis courts were built in 1974 and resurfaced in 1986 and 1990. The tennis courts were rebuilt in 1996, and resurfaced in 1999 and 2005. The home on the park property was demolished in 1991. The 1985 playground equipment was replaced in 1997. The most recent resurfacing of the basketball court took place in 2004. In 2003 Tennis West donated an adjustable basketball backboard to the basketball court. The sun shelter facility and portable toilet was replaced with a permanent park shelter facility in 1997. As part of the successful 1996 park improvement referendum, a hard surface pathway was also added to Todd Park in 1997. REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL City of Edina This is to inform you that the City of Edina is soliciting proposals from consulting firms to conduct a feasibility study and cost analysis for the development of an outdoor hockey rink with artificial refrigeration and a covered roof, plus a facility for storing an ice - resurfacing machine at Lewis Park in Edina. CONCEPT The City of Edina is interested in developing an outdoor hockey rink approximately 180' X 80' with a concrete surface at Lewis Park, which is located at 7300 Cahill Road (the intersection of Cahill Road and Dewey Hill Road) in Edina. The concept in mind is to, develop an outdoor hockey rink with artificial refrigeration. and a covered roof that could serve as a picnic shelter during the summer months. The hockey rink will be converted to picnic area during the summer months. The plan is to utilize outdoor hockey rink boards that can be removed in the summer months. The concept also calls for using an ice - resurfacing machine that will be stored on site. More specifically, the plan is to use the extra propane powered Zamboni from Braemar Arena. The plan is to resurface the outdoor ice once every hour on each of the two outdoor rinks at Lewis Park. There is an existing outdoor hockey rink at Lewis Park south of the shelter building (the south rink). The plan is to leave that hockey rink in place without artificial refrigeration and yet maintain it with the Zamboni every hour when weather permits. The new hockey rink will also require a new lighting system with fixtures located under the roof structure. The concept is to have the ability to operate fewer lights for early and late season picnics under the roof structure. This outdoor hockey rink will not have any bleacher seating. This is planned to be primarily a practice facility designed to have guaranteed quality outdoor ice from late October to the first week in March. It is the City of Edina's desire to develop this facility in the most cost effective manner possible. SOIL CONDITIONS AND TOPOGRAPHY SURVEY One of the challenges of this site location is its potential poor soil conditions. The City of Edina will pay for the necessary soil testing as well as any topography survey needed to accomplish the feasibility study. It will be the consultant's responsibility to determine the number and location of soil tests that need to be performed to accomplish the feasibility study. REFRIGERATION SYSTEM To have quality outdoor ice from late October to the first week in March, the plan demands use of artificial refrigeration. The City of Edina would like to know what the most cost effective artificial refrigeration system is in the long run. In other words, should the refrigeration system be built into the concrete floor or is it more cost effective to invest in a portable refrigeration system that can be placed on top of the concrete and City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 Park and Recreation Department www.cityofedina.com 952 - 826 -0367 FAX 952 - 826 -0385 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 then removed and stored during the summer months. With existing soil conditions, is it feasible to build a concrete floor with an artificial refrigeration system built into it? It is the City of Edina's desire to invest in a quality refrigeration system that requires the least amount of maintenance manpower to operate and maintain and yet will have an expected life span of over 15 years. If selected, the consultant will provide a recommendation as to which is the most fiscally responsible refrigeration system for this site, the cost to purchase and install, and provide a rough cost analysis of energy costs to operate the refrigeration system from the last week in October to the first week in March. If selected, the consultant will also recommend a secure structure and its location to contain the refrigeration system operating equipment. ICE RESURFACING MACHINE AND REFRIGERATION SYSTEM BUILDING(S) To use the propane powered ice - resurfacing machine that is currently stored at Braemar Arena, Lewis Park will need to have a facility large enough to store the machine and provide the necessary hot water to fill the machine prior to each resurfacing. The consultant' shall also determine the most feasible method and location that should be used to dispose of the ice shavings from the Zamboni. The consultant shall determine whether or not the existing building can be utilized to accommodate the Zamboni and its hot water needs. If a new building is required to store and maintain the Zambom, the consultant shall determine where it would be best placed on the site. It is the City of Edina's desire to have all additional building(s) designed in a manner to be architecturally compatible with the existing shelter building. If selected, the consultant shall submit concept drawings of all new proposed buildings and their locations on the site, including the building for the artificial refrigeration system. Again, it is the City of Edina's desire to have the minimal and yet cost effective building needed to accommodate the needs on site: HOCKEY BOARDS AND FENCING The concept also calls for portable dasher boards and fencing that can allow for some sections of boards to be removed during the summer months to accommodate picnic use access of the concrete floor. The end boards with fencing would stay up year around; however, the concept is to have a system of boards that could. allow for certain sections to be removed to provide easy access to the picnic area. If selected, the consultant will provide options of dasher board systems with costs. ROOF STRUCTURE The concept is to design a cost effective roof structure that could serve as both a roof to cover the outdoor hockey rink and also serve as a picnic shelter during the summer months. The roof structure would be open on both ends. The City of Edina is interested in a concept that would allow for the long sides to have a cost - effective movable door system that could serve as a wind break or have the ability to move the doors, or walls either up (garage door style) or slide sideways to allow for more free air flow. There may even be other cost effective low maintenance design concepts that can serve as a windbreak that could be considered. There needs to be enough air flow through the structure in the winter time to avoid humidity build up. The building should also.be aesthetically pleasing with low maintenance materials used in construction. If selected, N F, the consultant shall submit concept drawings of the roof structure building with various cost effective low maintenance windbreaks for the two long sides of the structure. MEETINGS AND PRESENTATIONS If selected, the consultant should expect to give one presentation to the Edina Park Board and one presentation to the Edina City Council meeting. The consultant would also be expected to attend one Edina Hockey Association Board meeting to solicit input from this user group. Park and Recreation Department staff will make themselves available for as many meetings as needed to complete the feasibility study. DEADLINE AND SELECTION PROCESS The City of Edina is requesting proposals from consultants to accomplish this feasibility study phase for this project to be submitted to the Park and Recreation Director no later than Tuesday, June 7, 10:_00 a.m. Consultants' proposals should include: • The total amount to be charged for professional services. • Listing of rates for any anticipated additional reimbursable expenses. • Proposed deadline that the feasibility study would be complete. • Previous experience with similar or related feasibility studies. • References of previous clients with contact information. • Any unique design ideas that would help Edina accomplish the concept proposal. The City of Edina reserves the right to select a consultant that appears to be in the City's best interests. The selection will be based on a combination of cost, experience, date that feasibility study would be completed by, references, and unique design ideas. Please submit your proposal no later than Tuesday, June 7, 10:00 a.m. to: John Keprios, Director Edina Park and Recreation Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 If you have any questions, feel free to call me at (952) 826 -0430 or send a fax to (952) 826 -0385 or send an email to Jkepriosaci.edina.mn.us. Thank you in advance for your interest in working with the City of Edina. S' y, ohn Keprio , it Edina Par and Recreation Department 3 EDINA PARK BOARD 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS EDINA CITY HALL JUNE 14, 2005 MEMBERS PRESENT: George Klus, Jeff Johnson, Linda Presthus, Todd Fronek, Jeff Sorem, Karla Sitek, Ray O'Connell, Jessica Selleck MEMBERS ABSENT: Mike Damman, Andy Finsness, Mike Weiss STAFF PRESENT: John Keprios, Ed MacHolda, Janet Canton, Vince Cockriel OTHERS PRESENT: John Peyton, Jim Fehrenbach, Sue Kelly, Jan Bernatz, Charlie Kelly, Tim Creajan, Jeff Bowers, Tim Campion, Molly Cronin, Pat Cronin, Nick Cronin, Kathleen Carter, Greta Simondet, Katie Meehan, Tim Meehan, Corrin Carlson, Al Carlson, Brad Benson, Ken Cutler, Craig Flom, Neal Campion, Nancy Hall, Doug Hall, Randy Sawnstrom, Jill Hartman, Albert Walla, Bill Reber, Bob Kaiser, Jon Moon, Julie Risser, Jean White, Heidi Dorfineister, Jeannie Hanson I. APPROVAL OF THE MAY 10, 2005 PARK BOARD MINUTES Linda Presthus MOVED TO APPROVE THE MAY 10, 2005 PARK BOARD MINUTES. Jeff Sorem SECONDED THE MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED. H. UPDATES A. Gymnasium Project — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that they are moving along on the gymnasium project. He noted that the School Board has learned that bids are coming in higher than what they had expected; and the price tag is around 5.2 million dollars to which they've now had to cut back on some things. He added that they are almost down to a bare bones facility and thinks they are going to have to live with whatever the price tag is and make a decision at that point. B. Youth Athletic Association Presidents & Connecting With Kids Joint Meeting - Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that they have a joint meeting coming up with the Youth Athletic Association Presidents and some of the Connecting with Kids positional leaders that is going to be hosted by the International Dairy Queen this Friday. He noted that the association presidents would be discussing some common topics. He pointed out that the Connecting With Kids positional leaders have a strong interest in the over - programming of youth. They also want to know more about how the athletic associations are training their coaches with regards not just the sport itself but also in raising and nurturing the youth. Mr. Keprios stated that they are all in it for the same mission which is to develop youth. He noted that he feels the Connecting With Kids initiative can play an important role in helping them accomplish that goal with some parental education. He indicated that he thinks some of the best ways to raise kids when it comes to youth sport is to try to find out how much is enough and how much is too much. C. Grandview Square Park Development — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that the Grandview Square Park project is within their final 10% of fundraising, and the Community Foundation is assisting with the final stage of fundraising. He noted that their fundraising is only about $5,000 short of the goal. He indicated that he anticipates that the Edina Community Foundation will approach the businesses of Grandview Square to see if they can help fill that last void. He noted that he anticipates the construction to be completed late August or early September. III. TODD PARK HOCKEY RINK PROPOSAL Mr. Klus gave an overview of the May Park Board meeting. He noted that residents who live around Todd Park were asked to voice their comments regarding permanent boards for an ice rink at Todd Park. He indicated that the Park Board heard from people who were both for and against the project. Mr. Klus pointed out that the Edina Hockey Association (EHA) was also invited to attend the Park Board meeting to address some of their needs to which no one from the EHA attended. He explained that EHA has stated that they do not want to be short one hockey rink in the community unless they absolutely had to; however, they do need outdoor rinks especially because the program is continuing to grow. Mr. Klus indicated that the Park Board tabled this item until the June Park Board meeting. Mr. Keprios explained that they have been working with EHA to look at developing a rink at Lewis Park to which a copy of the outline is in the Park Board's packet. He pointed out that the three page Request For Proposal document was put together to outline the concept of what the Park Board and the EHA has in mind to have a feasibility study done on building a second rink at Lewis Park. He pointed that this would not be an ordinary outdoor hockey rink but rather they would look at putting in artificial refrigeration to which both rinks would then be maintained with an ice - resurfacing machine. They would use the spare ice - resurfacing machine that they currently have at Braemar Arena, however, they would need a place to store it to which they would need to either build something or retrofit the existing shelter building. He noted that part of the concept would also look at possibly building a structure over the second rink which would be aesthetically pleasing as well as it could double as a picnic shelter during the summer. Therefore, the EHA has agreed to pay for a feasibility study to which a Request For Proposal was been sent out to 17 different architect engineering consulting firms. Mr. Keprios noted that of the five proposals they received back the studies ranged anywhere from accomplishing the project in seven to fifteen weeks and cost ranging from $7,500 to $30,000. He stated that the information will be presented to the EHA to look over and if they were to go with the low bid the study could be completed within seven 2 weeks, which would be pertinent to tonight's discussion. He commented that they may find that it's not even feasible to put in artificial refrigeration, however, if it can be determined in less than seven weeks there would still be the possibility of putting in an outdoor hockey rink at Lewis Park. They wouldn't necessarily have to have refrigeration and perhaps then Lewis Park could become the alternate site to the loss of Countryside Park. Mr. Keprios explained that the issue came about due to the removal of the hockey rink boards at Countryside Park because of its age, deterioration, and unsalvageable condition. The reason for not immediately replacing that hockey rink in its current location is due to its improper orientation and poor sub -soil conditions. He noted that it is still staffs recommendation that a master plan be implemented prior to replacing an outdoor hockey rink at Countryside Park. He noted that's not to say they can't put a hockey rink back at Countryside Park in its current improper orientation, however, that's not staff s recommendation because they feel it's improper use of $40,000. Staff feels that money would be money better spent to place the hockey rink at a different park until Countryside Park can be done correctly with a master plan. Mr. Keprios pointed out that he did list a few choices for the Park Board to consider. Based on input from the EHA, his first recommendation would be to build a second rink at Lewis Park which developed into a discussion of possibly putting in a fourth rink at Braemar. However, after a meeting with the EHA and Larry Thayer, Braemar Arena Manager, it was decided that would not be very feasible at this point. At that point it was decided that a better option would be to pursue an artificial refrigeration rink at Lewis Park, however, they don't want to be left short one outdoor rink for the 2005 -2006 season. Therefore, it was decided to look at another park, that being Todd Park. Mr. Keprios indicated that at the May Park Board meeting the motion that was passed was to table the issue because there were some concerns about the quality of ice at Todd Park. He noted that Vince Cockriel, Park Superintendent, is here to try and answer some of the questions and concerns. Mr. Klus stated that it was also discussed that if a hockey rink is not put in at Todd Park what they see the future being for Todd Park. He noted that it is a community park, which needs to be used for the youth in the community. He commented that at some point he does see this becoming an issue if there is not a hockey rink. In addition, one option that could become debatable is whether or not the area would be turned into a multi - purpose field. He noted that the city is always short on all- purpose fields that they would need to find a use for that area that could benefit the youth in our community. Mr. Klus stated that the Park Board would like to do all they can to recommend to the City Council that they don't lose a hockey rink this year. They really need to keep the same number of hockey rinks as last year. Mr. Cockriel explained that Todd Park is currently set up as one of the lower maintained rinks because there are no hockey boards. Their maintenance schedule is set up around maintaining the hockey rinks first because the sweepers come through at 3:00 am. Therefore, if they don't get to the hockey rinks within the next couple of hours the snow will heat up as they are blowing it from side to side against the boards to which it will then start to freeze up. He explained that someone has to come right behind the sweeper in order for the boards to get cleaned. Mr. Cockriel pointed out that they start on the north end at Weber Park and work their way along the northern part of the city and depending upon what time they get to Todd Park they sometimes need to skip that rink. Therefore, because Todd Park is last on the list, they typically flood it with a tanker truck, which in their experience using a tanker is not the way to get quality ice. He noted that they typically have two people on the rink with a hose; however, not having boards to flood against is not efficient use of manpower. Mr. Cockriel informed the Park Board that the turf underneath the ice at Todd Park has absolutely nothing to do with the quality of ice. He noted that % of his staff have been doing this for more than 20 years and they actually prefer Todd Park to Weber, Strachauer, Cornelia School or Creek Valley. He added that all of those parks have high water tables; however, the one thing Todd Park has that the others don't is better drainage. Therefore, making a good sheet of ice at Todd Park is absolutely no issue whatsoever. Mr. Sorem asked when were the previous boards taken out at Todd Park and what was the reason for it. Mr. Cockriel replied that he believes it was around 1989 and the reason was because of poor hockey board conditions, low usage and because it probably had the worst shelter building in the city at that time. Mr. Sorem asked how many years was the hockey rink there prior to it being taken down to which Mr. Cockriel replied at least a dozen. Richard Miller, 5340 Hollywood Road, indicated that he has lived on Vandervork or Hollywood Road for the past 35 years and he cannot conceive how you can have a recreation program in Minnesota without having a hockey rink. In addition, he also feels that it increases the value of their neighborhood as well as it increases the value of his own property by having an all -season recreational opportunity in their community. Jim Fehrenbach, 8 Spur Road, indicated that he has two young boys ages 4 and 5. He noted that he grew up in Roseville and was able to walk to the hockey rink where he learned to play hockey, boot hockey, whiffle ball and football. He commented that he stayed out of a lot of trouble by having that hockey rink. He added that he had a lot of fun there and has some wonderful memories. He stated that he would really like to see a hockey rink put in at Todd Park. Pat Cronin, 23 Cooper Avenue, indicated that he lives in the Hilldale neighborhood and for the record he clocked the distance and is 300 yards from Todd Park. He stated that no one in his neighborhood was informed of what is currently happening at Todd Park and that the Hilldale neighborhood does consider Todd Park to be their closest park. No one from his neighborhood was at the May Park Board meeting because they were unaware of what was happening. Mr. Cronin stressed that the Park Board needs to understand that 4 the vocal minority of people who were at the May Park Board meeting does not represent the neighborhood of Todd Park. Mr. Cronin pointed out that the neighborhood is flourishing with kids. He noted that he has two young boys who use the park all year and commented that it's hard to play sports on a sheet of ice without boards and that's the reason for low attendance. If you build a rink they will come because there are hundreds of kids in the area. Mr. Cronin explained that he is also here to represent EHA. He noted that he has been a hockey coach in the youth program for 11 years and that some of the best memories of his life have been coaching and playing hockey. He stated that he doesn't think this is an EHA issue but rather a neighborhood issue. Mr. Cronin stated that he does have some input from the EHA and read a letter from Hockey Board member Chips Gulbronson. The letter read "I'm sorry that I'm unable to attend this meeting but I have an interest on two levels as to why I would support adding hockey boards at Todd Park. I am a director on the EHA and my main responsibilities include registration and manager liaison. The program is continuing to grow and will exceed 1,200 skaters this year, what a great program. We have over 450 mite players who are typically the skaters who play outside. We are the largest association in the state as we continue to grow we will need more facilities. My managers find it increasingly more difficult to schedule ice time and are utilizing the existing outdoor rinks to their full capacity. The bottom line is we need more options to provide our residents with a quality program. My interest on the second level is that I am a resident of the Hilldale neighborhood and daily drive by Todd Park and see the beautiful warming house, which our tax dollars have built that is severely under- utilized. I grew up in Edina and believe the reason people continue to want to live in our community is because of the schools and everything Edina has to offer. One of those things is our great park and recreation department. Thank you. We need to keep moving forward to provide residents with great facilities. This will continue to increase property values and people will want to live in Edina. I think it would be in poor judgment not to allow hockey boards to be installed at Todd Park ". Mr. Cronin added that Ms. Gulbronson could not be here because of a soccer engagement with her kids. Ken Cutter, 19 Circle West, indicated that they moved to Edina in 1989 in part because of the proximity to Todd Park, which is approximately 300 yards. He stated that his daughter started skating there when she was approximately 8 years old and he really liked the fact that she could walk there without having to cross busy streets. He commented that Todd Park is viewed as a neighborhood park for that Hilldale neighborhood it is an important part of the neighborhood. He noted that his daughter was disappointed when the quality of ice deteriorated rapidly as she got older. However, this is something that does attract people to the neighborhood. He added that the park was also utilized by her older brother as they were growing up. Doug Hall, 4501 Parkside Lane, indicated that he has lived in his house since 1980, which is very close to the park. He noted that he grew up playing hockey in Edina and the one difference he has seen over the years is that the parks are being used by more families. It used to be that the hockey rinks were only used by an older group of boys and that families weren't around. However, what he sees now is that after a fresh snow 5 he sees families bringing their children to the Park and spending hours there. Mr. Hall stated that if there are ice quality and utilization issues then he thinks the Park Board needs to address the whole family and not just the narrow segment of the hockey community. Jeff Bisson, 9 Cooper, indicated that he has lived in this area a better part of his almost 40 years. He noted that Todd Park had a skating rink in the early 70's because he was approximately two years old. He stated that at that time the park was called Division Park and commented that a very important series of experiences in his life happened at the hockey rink at Todd Park. He commented that he was at the hockey rink with his brothers and their friends all of the time unsupervised and it was the warming house attendant who watched over them. Mr. Bisson noted that all of his recollections are that it was a family experience and a family place. He pointed out that the demographics of the neighborhood have changed since 1989 because now there are a lot more kids. Colleen Lucke, 15 Cooper Avenue, indicated that she is in favor of having a hockey rink even though her kids do not play hockey. However, her family loves to play pick -up hockey. She explained that for the past three years her family has been part of a group that reserves the Highland Park skating rink every Sunday night for their families to play hockey and have treats. Ms. Lucke stated that skating has been a big part of their social life and they've never had a problem even at the parks that are highly used for hockey. Therefore, they would love to see a hockey rink exist at Todd Park because it would be a nice place for families of all ages to enjoy. Michelle Sit, 23 Circle West, indicated that she has three kids and they enjoy the park all year. She noted that she drives by Todd Park on her way to other hockey rinks within Edina for her hockey players. She stated that her 7 year-old daughter had her birthday party at Todd Park and commented that they would love to have skating parties and boot hockey parties at Todd Park to get to know their neighbors better. Therefore, it would be great to be able to use a hockey rink at Todd Park during the winter months. Jeff Bowers, 12 Cooper Avenue, indicated that he moved to Edina last summer and on one of the first days of winter he thought it would be a great place to take his 2 %Z year- old daughter to go skating. However, the warming house was closed so they sat in the snow and put on their skates and needless to say they didn't last too long because she was freezing. He noted that it's such a beautiful facility and from a cost standpoint there really should be a hockey rink, his family would definitely use it. In addition, he thinks having the older kids playing hockey there is a great thing, it keeps them out of trouble. Mr. Bowers stated that it would be great to have a neighborhood park flourish all year. Nancy Hall, 4501 Parkside Lane, indicated that she lives right across the street from Todd Park and doesn't understand why no one has been using'the rink that is there. She noted that she hears the trucks every day at 6:30 am so it is definitely getting sprayed. She stated that she doesn't understand why people would now want start to use the rink just because of hockey boards. C1 John Peyton, 27 Cooper Circle, indicated that he has been involved with hockey for a lot of years and has a couple of kids who play hockey. He noted that he drives by the rink a lot and no one is using it, however, having grown up in front of a hockey rink he knows that if you build it they will come. People don't want to play hockey on an open sheet of ice. It would be a great benefit if a hockey rink were put in at Todd Park. Mr. Peyton pointed out that when he moved to the area in 1989 there weren't very many kids but now there are a ton of young kids who would use that rink. Neal Campion, 4436 Vandevork Avenue, indicated that he thinks there are a lot of concerns from people who live by the park that it's not going to be maintained the other 42 to 44 weeks of the year. He noted that they have all driven by and looked at permanent hockey boards and the way they are maintained and it does become a real eye sore. He stated that he remembers in 1989 a comment was made that from that time forward any park with boards would need to have a four - season surface. Therefore, what is really being talked about is taking a significant part of the park and it would be used for 8 to 10 weeks and for the other 42 to 44 weeks there would be no use to speak of for that portion of the park. He pointed out that if temporary boards were put up and taken down each season they would have back that portion of the park when it's not the hockey season. In other words the majority of the year they would have the use of that area. He noted that it seems rather than spend money to put up and take down the boards each season you're doing it the cheap way by leaving them up all year. Mr. Campion stated that the boards are going to be neglected and vandalized and 10 to 20 years from now you are going to have to put up new boards because these will have then been destroyed. He explained that his thoughts are if temporary boards are put up there will probably be less resistance from the neighborhood. He added they could charge a fee for the people who use the rink, the EHA. Mr. Campion commented that if there are 350 kids in the mite program why not put a surcharge on them and they can pay for putting up and taking down the removable hockey boards. Mr. Campion indicated that a comment was recently made that Todd Park is 30 plus acres. He informed the Park Board that a couple of people did measure the park and there is approximately 7 acres of useable open space. Therefore, it's not as large as they were lead to believe. He pointed out that this is a very busy park and it's good to see a lot of kids in the area, however, to take 42 to 44 weeks of the year seems to him to not be very efficient use of the area. Molly Cronin, 11 Cooper Avenue, indicated that she grew up in a house that backed up to Walnut Ridge Park. She explained that when her parents built that house in 1984 they knew the park was there. She noted one of the reasons they loved to be there was so during the winter they could see all of the skaters. She commented that it's not as if they moved in not knowing that these things existed. They knew that if they wanted to get a view of the beauty and open space they would have to deal with the people working very hard at 3:00 am on those cold winter mornings. Ms. Cronin pointed out that during the summer while growing up next to Walnut Ridge Park they played inside of the hockey boards all of the time because it provided a great sort of boundary for them to play. They never considered it an eyesore. She commented that as a mother of young children she VA would love it if there were boards so she wouldn't have to worry about flying pucks hitting her children. Al Carlson, 4424 Vandervork, indicated that if you look at the actual useable open space of Todd Park it's probably one of the most developed parks in Edina. He stated that personally he is not opposed to the hockey rink as long as the boards were removed during the summer months. He noted that the City of Minneapolis is able to remove their boards. He added that when he was growing up they played soccer, t -ball, etc., in open spaces and fields. Therefore, he is in favor of a hockey rink if the boards were removed during the summer months. Kathleen Carter, 4500 Vandervork Ave., indicated that she grew up in Edina and lives directly across from the park, which at that time was called Division Park. She noted that there are a lot more things at the park now compared to when she was growing up. Now there is a walking path, tennis courts, new warming house, basketball court, softball field and skating rink. Ms. Carter stated that living across the street from the park she is concerned that if the boards are left up all year it would really take away what little green space there is in the park. She added that it will also cause additional traffic and at some point it's going to require a parking lot. She stated that this may not be an issue for the Park Board but it's going to become an issue for someone's committee because of the Park Board's actions. She stated that she would be against the permanent hockey facility based on the limited acreage of the park. Tim Meehan, 5229 Hollywood, noted that when the Park Board was talking about Lewis Park and Countryside Park he heard things like feasibility study and bringing in an architect to do a complete study so that they do it right. However, when you talk about Todd Park it's lets just slap it in and see what happens. He indicated that no disrespect to the Park Superintendent but he's around the park every day and right now there is standing water all over the park. There are ducks and geese swimming in the 7 acres of green space that has been talked about. Mr. Meehan commented that just because they are opposed to having the rink doesn't mean they are against family use of the park. He noted that what they are talking about is the best use of the park and he has now heard a couple of people say that having a hockey rink doesn't make sense for the best use of the park. If they want the park to be for the youth then there needs to be some open space. He pointed out that Todd Park is the smallest park with this many facilities in Edina. He noted that area where the potential hockey rink is proposed would be abutted directly on all four sides by housing to which there is no other park like this within the city. Mr. Meehan indicated that if the Park Board is going to pursue this he thinks what they are really doing is perpetuating poor management of the park system. He noted that mistakes have been made at Countryside Park and they don't want the same thing to happen at Todd Park because it really is an eyesore. Mr. Meehan stated that he thinks the Park Board should step back and spend more time on this. He noted that he appreciates that they are asking for the community's input because he thinks there are a lot of people here who have years and years of experience that are on both sides of the equation. Therefore, he feels more discussion needs to take place on this issue. Mr. Meehan stressed to the Park Board that they are not a sports facility board and that there is a benefit to having 8 green space in a park that does add value to the community. Not every little space needs to be developed. Mr. Cronin asked how much money has been invested in the Todd Park warming house to which Mr. Keprios replied that he doesn't have a specific amount because the four new shelter buildings were built with one contract. However, he would say to build Todd Park it cost approximately $200,000 and $250,000. Mr. Cronin stated that he thinks it's an absolutely beautiful building and for some people having a hockey rink is an eyesore but for others having a rink is a thing of beauty. He pointed out that he would like to contradict a little bit on what Mr. Meehan stated earlier in that he thinks it would be poor management of the park system to develop Todd Park. He stated that he thinks it's almost the opposite in that if the city has invested all of this capital into a structure and they are asking to invest just a tiny bit more to make it functional all year he feels it would be poor management not to build the rink. Al Carlson, 4424 Vandervork Avenue, indicated that the neighborhood received a letter before the winter season basically saying that the building was going to be open a limited number of hours because of budget constraints. The letter asked for input from the residents on what evenings and time periods they would like to see the building open. The letter did not say anything about low usage at the park. He commented that if the city can afford to man a warming house seven days a week then they could probably afford to man it now seven days a week to which it would be used a lot more then it presently is. Katie Meehan, 5229 Hollywood Road, indicated that she is very proud of the Todd Park community and noted that several years ago the neighborhood started "Street Greets" which is where they invite the community and have bands, food, games, prizes, etc., it is very family /youth oriented. She noted that each event has been attended by at least 60 people. She pointed out that the park is surrounded by a lot of houses and they watch out for each other and watch over all of the kids. She commented that they have also engaged the seniors who live at the Brookside apartment building because they recognize that it's important for seniors to interact with youth and families and that's of value. Ms. Meehan noted that they also united to remove buckthorn. She stressed that the Todd Park neighborhood is very community oriented and she doesn't like being cast the "not in my backyard" and that they're not for the youth and they don't want this. She explained that she is all in favor of hockey; she's not in favor of permanent boards. She would like to see them taken down in the summer so they are not poorly maintained. Mr. Cockriel pointed out that you typically don't see the smaller communities putting up and taking down hockey boards. He noted that he believes that St. Paul and some areas of Minneapolis and Hopkins still use portable hockey boards. He explained that the issue with portable boards is of course it costs taxpayer dollars to put them up and take them each year as well as there is the storage issue. In addition there's a safety issue because after the first year the portable boards are never the same because they become uneven and warped. Because the ground moves the board section that is put up one year doesn't necessarily fit on that same section of ground the next year. Lastly, because they are E moved so much they end up with a shelf life that is less than typical hockey boards. Mr. Cockriel commented that people from all over the United States ask for the blueprints of Edina's hockey boards. He indicated that the reason is because they stay true. The ground moves but the boards move with it in a serpentine manner and not an uneven manner like some of the boards you will see in Minneapolis and St. Paul. He stated that it makes no difference; however, he sees it as a waste of manpower, and maintenance to put them up and take them down each year. Mr. Klus asked Mr. Cockriel to talk about the maintenance program of the boards to which Mr. Cockriel replied that they typically try to replace the boards every ten years. He pointed out that they don't paint them anymore because that was an issue with the puck marks. He noted that all of the newer rinks are left the green treated look, which is natural to the setting. Mr. Cockriel stated that he doesn't doubt that there's an occasion when the weeds grow up around the insides of boards because of standing water which is evident in most hockey rinks, however, he's not going to force his staff to put on chest waders and weed whip around them. Mr. Cockriel commented that they do have three rinks that have solid bases and noted that all three of them do get some summer use. Mr. Fronek indicated that from what he gathers there seems to be a limited number of ice skating rinks but there also seems to be a limited amount of green space in the parks. He asked Mr. Keprios to speak a little bit about how to balance that as well as how he came up with his recommendation. Mr. Keprios replied that how this all got started was through the Edina Hockey Association's input and concern over reducing the total number of outdoor hockey rinks. Mr. Keprios indicated that based on a lot of input from the community, to which he applauds the Park Board for listening to the community, he noted that it would be nice if they could come to some kind of a conclusion where they could put another outdoor hockey rink in the system so that they don't have a net loss compared to what they had for the 2004 -2005 season. Mr. Keprios stated that he thinks if they allow EHA to review the Request For Proposals responses that were received and let them iron out whether or not they want to move forward with it. Hopefully by the September Park.Board meeting staff will have a recommendation of where to go. Mr. Keprios explained that there is still the option of putting in a second hockey rink at Lewis Park without going the full nine yards and spending thousands of dollars to build an artificial rink not knowing where the money is going to come from. Therefore, his recommendation is to wait until the feasibility study is completed and EHA makes a decision on which direction they want to go. At that time he thinks the Park Board should address the issue of where an outdoor rink should go. Mr. Keprios stressed again that staffs recommendation is to not put a hockey rink back in at Countryside Park in the wrong orientation. He commented that he would like to find the funding to establish a master plan for Countryside Park regardless of what is decided regarding outdoor hockey rinks. Mr. Keprios explained that Edina is short green space and we are a fully developed and landlocked community. He noted that by listening to the Todd Park neighborhood he thinks by not putting in a rink it would give them the opportunity to upgrade that space and put some dollars into beautifying the neighborhood so it's even greener and better for 10 a multiple of sports during the warm weather months. He commented that from what he's heard the neighborhood thinks this would be a fairly good compromise. However, they would probably end up with more scheduled events during the summer but at least they wouldn't have to look at the hockey boards during the warm weather months. Mr. Keprios stressed that he doesn't think the Park Board should make a decision on where to put a rink until EHA has had a chance to review the proposals and find out what the results of the feasibility study are. Mr. Sorem indicated that he's confused because there seems to be a contradiction because if the area is below the water table and there is standing water he would be concerned about the grass quality for sports. It's already been stated that the quality of ice would be fine. He commented that he doesn't know what the cost would be to renovate that type of field to make it a good field like Lewis Park. Everyone wants green space but it doesn't appear to be great green space. Mr. Keprios responded that is a fair comment. He noted that they might just have to put significant dollars into Todd Park as we have done at Lewis Park and Braemar Park athletic fields if that's the direction the Park Board wants to go. He stated that to do it right so it drains off immediately after rain they are looking at some significant dollars we would also need the watershed district's blessing to alter the grade. Mr. Keprios pointed out that he thinks they can at least slightly improve the area if they were to take out the ice rink. Ms. Presthus asked whether or not they would put in a hard surface area so that it would be useable during the summer for rollerblading, roller hockey, etc. or would it be left green grass. Mr. Keprios replied that the plan all along has been to just have grass. Mr. Sorem asked if a hard surface could be put in after the fact to which Mr. Cockriel replied that as long as they get grade right before they put up the boards there should be no problem. Mr. O'Connell indicated that he has been very persuaded by tonight's testimony and thinks what he heard Mr. Keprios say is he would like to delay this vote and wait until EHA has had a chance to look at the proposals. He stated that the Todd Park neighborhood has a rink that is very close to them and it's a long way from Todd Park to Lewis Park and they are talking about a lot of small children in the neighborhood. He noted that the population is also increasing with young people who will be using the park. Mr. Keprios commented that he thinks it's worthy to mention the reason why this was proposed. It is not because the neighborhood came to the Park Board requesting this park amenity, it's because EHA came to them and said they don't want a net loss of one outdoor hockey rink. He noted that at that time staff came up with various options to which Lewis Park was his first recommendation based on input from the EHA. However, the Park Board chose not to go there and wanted to go to Todd Park instead because the thought was that it would be more difficult for the non - residents to find. Mr. O'Connell indicated that he would strongly be in favor of having a roof covered situation at Lewis Park to relieve some the pressure on Braemar rather than build a fourth sheet of ice. He stressed that with refrigerated ice on a permanent and covered surface is going to have a much longer life as far as the season goes. 11 Mr. Johnson commented that he agrees with Mr. O'Connell in that he also was under the impression that Lewis and Todd Park are two separate issues. He noted that his understanding is that Lewis Park would be done in place of a fourth sheet of ice at Braemar. However, the Todd Park rink is to replace the rink at Countryside Park so there would not be a net loss to EHA's program. Therefore, he's not sure why EHA's request for proposal time frame has anything to do with this. Mr. Keprios explained that the reason why it would play a role is because if EHA decides after their deliberations that this is something that would not be doable they could still put in an outdoor hockey rink without refrigeration. Mr. Johnson stated that, he thinks if they do put in a second rink at Lewis Park they should also put one in at Todd Park because they probably could use two more outdoor rinks because of the lack of ice time that's available for the kids in this community. Mr. Johnson indicated that in regards to green space issues if they place a new field at Todd Park it would still increase traffic five to six months out of the year where with a hockey rink it would be approximately two months out of the year. Mr. Johnson stressed that the parking issue would definitely then come into play. He commented that one of the big issues of the neighborhood was traffic and parking problems. He stated that his main concern is to either move the rink to Todd Park or put it back at Countryside Park. Mr. Sorem stated that he's a little confused because it seems that some of the people who were at last month's meeting who were against the rink are now not so much against the rink but are against permanent. hockey boards. Therefore he thinks they just need to discuss removable boards versus permanent boards. Mr. Sorem pointed out that the numbers in the youth hockey program are just staggering as well as he will attest that he has had a difficult time finding an open hockey rink on Saturdays and Sundays. Therefore, maybe they need to look at putting in additional rinks because right now they are talking about trying to find a place where they can replace the Countryside rink, which is a must in his mind. Mr. Sorem commented that he understands and appreciates all of the concerns for and against the hockey rink at Todd Park.. However, their job is to look at the needs of the community as a whole and Todd Park is a community -based' park. He noted that it just makes too much sense to him to replace the rink at Countryside Park to Todd Park. Edina's park maintenance staff is by far the best in the state if not the Country. Jeff Sorem MOVED TO BUILD A PERMANENT STRUCTURE RINK AT TODD PARK. Ray O'Connell SECONDED. Ms. Presthus indicated that they have not discussed the parking issue to which she has some pretty strong concerns about kids darting between cars and not providing proper parking. She asked since the neighborhood seems negative about having asphalt parking surface' have they ever considered using pavers for a parking surface instead of putting in asphalt. Mr. Keprios replied that he doesn't believe the city has any paver style parking lots in the park system. Mr. Cockriel stated that they do have what they call a GEO grid road surface at the Sherwood pump house at Sherwood Park and one also over at 12 Browndale Park. However, the disadvantage of that is if the soil conditions underneath cannot handle that kind of traffic you end up with the pavers shifting and coming up and actually being torn up. In addition when they are plowed during the wintertime it exposes that grass to the hard frost to which you almost have to start over again every spring as far as the grass goes. Mr. Keprios stated that he personally doesn't support that approach for a parking lot. If the park needs a parking lot, it should be an asphalt parking lot. Mr. Klus commented that his thought on this motion is he's in favor of an ice rink at Todd Park, however, he's not so sure that a decision needs to be made tonight. He noted that they could put this off until August after they've received a little bit more feedback. He indicated that he thinks that would still give them enough time to make a decision and still be able to put up a rink if they agree to do it at Todd Park. Mr. Keprios asked Mr. Cockriel how much time his staff would need to build a hockey rink to which Mr. Cockriel replied if a decision were made by the middle of August they would still be okay. Mr. Johnson stated that he would disagree because there have already been two meetings with open discussion and they have already heard from everyone who has an opinion. If they table it for another month he really doesn't know that it would make that much of a difference. Mr. Sorem commented that he would assume that a little pleasure rink would go along with it to which Mr. Cockriel replied that is correct. Mr. Keprios added that it would also require the installation of some new lighting. IN FAVOR: Jeff Johnson, Karla Sitek, Todd Fronek, Linda Presthus, Jessica Selleck, Jeff Sorem, Ray O'Connell AGAINST: George Klus Mr. Keprios stated that this will be on the August 2 "d City Council agenda. He also indicated that the Park Board minutes are published on the website after they've been approved. However, he will make an exception this time and publish the unapproved Park Board minutes. IV. WATER QUALITY PRESENTATION — CONSERVATION LEAGUE OF EDINA Jan Goldman- Carter, 4504 Casco Avenue, a member of the Conservation League of Edina, gave the Park Board a power point presentation. She indicated that they are working in a partnership with the Edina Community Foundation, the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Mr. Klus stated that the Park Board appreciates all of their work and what they are doing within the city. 13 V. OTHER A. Arneson Acres - Mr. Keprios indicated that during the construction project that is currently going on at Arneson Acres they have learned that the feed line that serves the fire suppression system at Arneson Acres is undersized and always has been. He noted that, if they were to have a fire, it probably would not have the pressure needed to save the building. Therefore, the fire marshal has asked since it is already under construction would it be possible to pipe in the proper line. Mr. Keprios asked Mr. Cockriel how much it would cost to do that to which Mr. Cockriel replied he would guess approximately $1.5,000. Mr. Keprios asked if he could get the Park Board's blessing to utilize the Developer's Fund. He noted currently there is approximately $90,000 in the Developer's Fund. Mr. Keprios explained that before any action is taken there is another item that is coming their way. He stated that they have received a formal complaint from the attorney's office regarding proper ADA accessible parking and access to the Edina Aquatic Center. What is currently in place may not be ADA compliant. Therefore, they are working very closely and positively with them.. Mr. Keprios noted that they have come up with a plan that would be a great fix without significantly alteri% the character of the park. They would basically create a small parking lot just off of 66 Street immediately to the south entrance of the bathhouse. However, the price tag is going to be significantly larger than $15,000 it will probably be closer to $40,000. Mr. Keprios noted that he wanted to the give the Park Board a heads up. Mr. Keprios stated what he is asking for tonight is the Park Board's blessing to approve approximately $15,000 to $20,000 out of the Developer's Fund to take care of the problem at Arneson Acres. Mr. Cockriel stressed that timing is of the essence with this project because they have to do it while 70th Street is torn up. If they go in and do it later it's going to be more expensive. Ray O'Connell MOVED TO APPROVE USE OF THE DEVELOPER'S FUND TO PAY FOR THE PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF THE PROPER WATER SERVICE LINE TO ARNESON ACRES PARK. Karla Sitek SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNAMIMOUSLY. B. Centennial Lakes Amphitheatre - Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that the dedication of the Maetzold Amphitheatre at Centennial Lakes will be this Sunday at 7:00 pm followed by the Sousa Band Concert. Mr. Keprios commented that for Mayor Maetzold has long been a strong supporter of parks and recreation and he encourages everyone to attend this special event in his honor. C. Future Agenda Items — Mr. Fronek asked to have the Countryside Park master plan put on the agenda for the Park Board to start to discuss. D. Mr. O'Connell commented that when he attended an interesting meeting on May 14th with the Conservation League that did a bird study along with Wood Lake Nature Center staff and Bob Atol. He stated that Braemar Golf Course is now certified by the Audubon 14 Society for meeting the 7 main criteria established by the Audubon Society. Mr. O'Connell also stated that Braemar Golf Course contributes to good water quality because of the things they've implemented since about 1997. VI. ADJOURNMENT Linda Presthus MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 9:00 P.M. Jeff Sorem SECONDED THE MOTION. MEETING ADJOURNED. 15 John Keprios, Director Edina Park & Recreation Department 4801 West 50`h Street Edina, MN 55424 Office (952) 826 -0430 FAX (952) 826 -0385 Jkeprios@ci.edina.mn.us Memo To: NEIGHBORS OF TO D ;K From: John Keprios, Direc r CC: Edina Park Board Date: April 7, 2005 Re: PROPOSED HOCKEY RINK AT TODD PARK. At the February Park Board meeting, the Park Board voted to consider a proposal to place an outdoor hockey rink back at Todd Park. I say "back at Todd Park" because several years ago there used to be an outdoor hockey rink where the existing light poles are currently in place. Before making a final decision, the Park Board would like your input on the proposal. There are a number of reasons why the Park Board is considering placing a hockey rink back at Todd Park. Placing a hockey rink back at Todd Park will help meet the demand for organized outdoor hockey rink practice time. There is also a desire to take advantage of the beautiful park shelter building at Todd Park that is underutilized during the winter months. Due to Todd Park's location, placing a hockey rink back at Todd Park will likely attract mainly Edina residents and serve the immediate neighborhood If a hockey rink were placed back at Todd Park, it would be subject to the same reservation policy in place for all other outdoor hockey rinks in Edina parks. In other words, the hockey rink could be reserved by Edina resident groups for scheduled uses from 6:00 p.m. to 9:15 p.m. weekday evenings; and 12:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. on Saturdays; and 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. on Sundays. The only exception to the policy is that the Edina Hockey Association is allowed to reserve additional scheduled times on Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays. All Edina outdoor hockey rinks remain unscheduled and open to public use from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. on weekdays. To provide your input on this proposal, the Park Board welcomes you to submit your comments in writing either by email or fax or letter to me at the address and information listed above. You are also welcome to attend the Park Board meeting scheduled for Tuesday, May 10, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. in the Community Room (2"d floor in City Hall). Thank you in advance for your input. It is greatly appreciated. To: John Keprios} Director, Edina Park & Recreation Department Cc: James Hovland, Mayor, City of Edina Edina City Council Scot Housh Linda Masica Edina Park Board Mike Damman Todd Fronek Alice Hulbert Linda Presthus Karla Sitek Mike Weiss Alice Hubert Ann Swenson Andy-Fisness Jeff Johnson George Klus Jessica Selleck Jeff Sorem From: CONCERNED NEIGHBORS OF TODD PARK We offer the attached petition as partial feedback to your letter of April 7, 2005 describing a proposal for a hockey rink in Todd Park. The overwhelming majority of Todd Park neighbors object to the proposal. While a number of neighbors may have submitted feedback independently, the attached demonstrates a position of solidarity of the neighborhood against the proposal. We anticipate forwarding additional signatures in advance of the meeting of the Park Board next Tuesday, May 10h. To: John Keprios, Director Edina Park & Recreation Department Cc: City of Edina Park Board From: CONCERNED NEIGHBORS OF TODD PARK Date: April 20, 2005 Re: PROPOSED HOCKEY RINK AT TODD PARK The undersigned strongly object to the proposal outlined in your letter of April 7, 2005 for establishing a hockey rink in Todd Park. While difficult to respond to the vague proposal contained in your letter, we assume for purposes of this petition that the proposal involves a permanent surface surrounded by a permanent board structure. The neighbors of Todd Park take 'a very active role in the care & upkeep of the Park. A recent example is the large number of volunteers involved in last fall's Buckthorn eradication efforts. Neighbors also routinely police & cleanup Park grounds to maintain its suitability for family use. While we support the Edina's interest in increasing rink availability, we strongly object to the use of Todd Park as the locale for, among other reasons, the following: EROSION OF FAMILY USE PARK SPACE Todd Park is currently highly utilized, particularly in the summer months. An additional permanent structure in the Park would eliminate a large swath of field that receives significant summer -time use by families attempting to keep children from harm's way of, or interfering with, the other organized sports activities in the park such as softball, basketball, tennis and the bike path. An additional permanent structure in this location would, in essence, transform the land from a neighborhood park into a city sports facility. SAFETY E14PACT OF INCREASED TRAFFIC Safety is a major concern to all of us in the neighborhood — Todd Park is a small park, with short, dead -end streets on its east & west sides. The Park is bordered on its north by an apartment complex catering to the elderly. Division Street, the Parks south border is subject to heavy traffic use by neighborhoods to. the west. The on the west side of the park, Vandervork Avenue is already a very busy street, filled with activity of cars filled with children and parents utilizing the playground area, basketball courts and softball field. The high vehicle traffic is already unnerving for parents of young children in the surrounding area. We do not consider increased traffic a positive impact to our neighborhood. LACK OF PARKING Previous proposals from the city included the addition of a parking lot to compensate for. the additional usage. A parking lot would not diminish the traffic concern, and would further erode the availability of grassy areas for picnics and other family activities. We certainly do not need further pavement of paradise to put up a parking lot. ENVIRONMENTAL U14PACT Todd Park is within the Minnehaha Watershed and drains directly into the Minnehaha Creek. The current drain system in the park leaves much to be desired. The Minnehaha Watershed District was not aware of this proposal, and had not been asked to conduct an environmental impact assessment. The District's input on this proposal is essential. In addition, the location of the rink in the watershed will likely lead to continual movement of the rink foundation, requiring constant & costly repair. APPARENT LACK OF PLANNING No Park Board vote should occur until the Board & the public are presented with a detailed study showing, at a minimum, the expected environmental, traffic & safety impact of the proposal. Investment in Todd Park would be better directed to planting of new trees to replace the very old and damaged trees which are currently at risk. It would also be nice if the city would assist in our efforts to clear out the buckthorn. The park shelter building does get a fair amount of usage, but just as the hockey rink was suggested, and rejected, a few years ago, so was the building. It is a shelter the city built without the support of the neighborhood and is now trying to boost its usage to support its existence. The neighbors of Todd Park care very much about the park and have asked for support from our city officials in the past, only to be disappointed, we hope that will not be the case again. We understand there is a need for additional hockey rinks in Edina and hope that there is another park facility that can provide you with more appropriate space. I .. I FRUFM i /efL Sm � ' C 1 V 4ii� fiWAA � WON= J �1 � L � F. gF A! PAP OFA k, wim, /efL Sm MIA, ffA" ,"M 11"'Alill "0 Mw " Wl �.,,A- ,OW I - ., ,O N AM, 4., e MMMFM o M�", WA 1, I Fly lizzoi-MY / 14 SO rl. I MA ,j r►�j YAME ADDRESS 4, u s �. z �v ,I YC ( ZzZ __ll e /3rG &S'Ke e! -Pg, U12 4(1- 1 " -or R &cbj "a J 3 j � r !ol t 4ia % % r►�j 11 NAAM ADDRESS et - 1!7 'J A.4 7L 11 rM R ' r ,. tr � r i } :Y+:.a:•• �F ;bra% X3.5 , � NAME } }'; A AD:D }:._ .s.:S..: r ^ ^:�r ' i N� ! fr1' �T?r,�17 r r.r f�'.�`j r 'S ' '} •��+ �.i••�:'i'•''; J J4 r.rf: � r'. �.r RM ri : o. _ ', •. _ {Y_. _ _[i ,wl1Y �•� .Y. . s:A: •,dG'•...�y$s.;. 'MA , 5 .• a��;,f_ �v .: �. ,a . .- � ar..... i ON _" Ld: • f . .1 � � s gor, Az ale' >15 Iv 'J. i r /a o, e z a- e n r a vT y ) O� TO 71'-11 c' 6 DL r� E?�l' ��t'd'YoeCCJx�'' VEX * t 777 �yJTr x!Lam/ 0 John Keprios From: Andrew.J.Herring @supervalu.com Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 4:45 PM ro: John Keprios Cc: patcronin @incentiveservices.com Subject: Todd Park Hey, John- I wanted to write-you in support of adding boards at Todd Park. The neighborhood is really turning over (there are a lot more younger families), and I think the rink would get used. I remember how expensive it is to maintain these rinks; however, there is strong support in the neighborhood, and I think it merits the investment. If the use is not there this winter, you can move the boards. I will not be able to attend the council meeting. this email in the packets for the members? Hope all is well. Andy Herring SUPERVALU Pharmacies off: 952.294.7256 cell: 952.210.0479 1 Accordingly, would you please include iviessage John Keprios From: Laurie Greeno [Laurie.Greeno @genmills.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 2:40 PM To: John Keprios Subject: Todd Park Hockey Rink Meeting: Two Key considerations John - Page 1 of 1 r , I live at 9 Circle West, approx 3 blocks from Todd Park. My family and I are frequent Todd Park users -- daily walking (me), weekly biking, occasional soccer, kite flying, and in. winter skating and pick -up hockey and broomball. If (and only if) two key considerations could be addressed (see below), I would be receptive to the rink addition at Todd Park 1) Protecting Time for Un- organized hockey My sons enjoy pick -up hockey w/ their friends and this is one of the few close rinks that allows that -- because it's not scheduled for hockey teams. My boys are at the age where I love to encourage this type of activity w/ friends, followed by pizza and hot chocolate back at our place.... How can time /access for this "unorganized "/neighborhood hockey be preserved for those not on organized teams. E.g. designating certain times -- as "good" and as frequent as those allotted to the teams -- for non - organized team activity? 2) Removing the Boards During non - winter months Do the rinks have to be left up all year round? As a daily walker around that park, I do enjoy the wide open spaces and would, frankly, find a year round rink an eyesore. Several of the parks w/ these (Arden, Highlands, Normandale) have them situated out of the main area of the park and the rinks are thus difficult to see. I am concerned that this one will be a central feature of the park (given its location) all year round. I would venture to guess that the walking path is used by hundreds of people weekly (if not daily) many of whom would greatly prefer not to see the rink up during non -ice times of the year. If this one could be "removable" I believe that would help people feel much better about it. (No doubt that adds to the labor /expense involved, but perhaps the hockey teams could volunteer to handle this in return for getting an additional rink....) Thank you for your consideration of this matter and how to make this a "win /win" for the neighborhood.' Laurie Greeno 9 Circle West Edina MN 55436 952 927 6676 ' I will not be able to attend this evening's meeting (prior commitment to attending the School Board meeting). 6/14/2005 t Dear John, I received your note regarding a proposed hockey rink at Todd Park. I'm all for it. As a hockey player and father of two boys who will be in the Edina hockey system, I was disappointed that there was not a hockey rink there this year. I support the effort 100 %. Best, David Musolf 4504 Brookside Ave. Edina, MN 55436 David Musolf Business Development Greer.:.:& :Associates dmusolf @thinkgreer.com 61.2- 33.8 -6171 x236 www.t:hinkgreer.com Dear Mr. Keprios, Thanks for taking inputs from the residents of Edina living near Todd park on this issue. I stay on Parkside Lane and am able to take my little twins walking without any hassle because there are few cars parked, few people around. I feel opening the rink will take away the ease of just being able to walk with little kids without worrying too much about traffic. In addition, it will make it crowded and busy. Given a vote, I would therefore vote AGAINST the hockey rink at Todd park. Regards Mayank John, We would like you to know that we strongly favor a rink with boards for Todd Park. We.drive our kids to either Highlands or Weber to play "pick -up" hockey. our kids love to play recreationally. It is a shame that such a beautiful warming house is wasted during the winter months. We would love to have a rink close by so that our kids could walk to and play hockey and skate with our neighbor kids. Please take our neighborhood desires into consideration. Hilldale and the homes near Todd park have a lot of kids and this would be an asset to our neighborhood. Annie Cronin 23 Cooper Circle Dear Mr. Keprios I live on the north side of the park and thoroughly enjoy my location - I like seeing the children, families and pets that use'the park daily - and I enjoy the walking trail and the.tennis courts for he and the playground for my grandchildren when,they visit. However, I am not in favor of a hockey rink and organized outdoor -hockey - mainly because of noise and traffic during weekend and "evening hours. Thank you for allowing me to express my opinion. .Very truly, B. Keegan Dear Mr. Keprios, I have a large interest in seeing hockey boards installed at Todd Park. I am a resident of Hilldale and have grown up in Edina. While growing up in Edina one of the strong points of our community is the Park and Recreation Department. The commitment on your part to Todd Park was made when you used funds to build the warming house. This facility is under utilized due to the fact there are no hockey boards available. The neighborhood which uses Todd Park goes beyond the boundaries of the houses which border the park. My second level of interest is that I am a member of the Edina Hockey Association Board. I have spoken with Mike Wagner today and discussed his point of view. He has stated to me that the Lewis Park set -up would be optimal but the bottom line is we need outdoor ice to supplement for our program to run. If it is at Lewis, great if it is at Todd Park, great. We just need more ice for the 1200+ participants of the EHA. The bottom line is this matter has already been approved and the next step is to go in front of the City Council for approval. This meeting being added with short notice and without proper notification is wrong. Sincerely, Chips Gulbronson 5 Cooper Avenue 922 -7430 Page 1 of 1 John Keprios From: Jim Fehrenbach Ofehrenbach @mn.rr.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 4:29 PM To: John Keprios Subject: Todd Park Hockey Rink Hello, My name is Jim Fehrenbach. I live a 8 Spur Rd. in Edina, right around the comer from Todd Park. I would like to voice my support for getting a hockey rink at the park mainly for the use of my 4 and 5 year old boys, the other children in the neighborhood, and all the kids in Edina. I'm having trouble understanding how people can oppose a hockey rink at a park. Do they not want kids to play hockey? Do they no want people to use the park? Obviously, the park does not belong to those people but to all Edina residents. The park wasn't erected before they bought they're property and I'd argue if you live close to it, it enhances your property value. I feel the only reason someone would not want a park is selfishness. They don't want anyone using what they believe is theirs. I'm sorry it has to come to this, for me to write an email supporting a hockey rink for children to play in. We all have better things to do with our time. Thank you reading this, Jim Fehrenbach 6/15/2005 a v�u t ialA a1VVAGy lx ula John Keprios From: Christensen, John M (GE Consumer & Industrial) [ John .Christensen@lighting.ge.com] Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 10:28 AM To: John keprios Subject: Todd Park Hockey Rink Importance: High Mr. Keprios, I am writing to you today to express my strong support for placing a hockey rink at Todd Park. Page 1 of 1 My wife Amy and I have lived on Rutledge Avenue, less than a block up the street from Todd Park, for four years. When we first moved in to the neighborhood, I perceived there to be only a handful of kids living on our immediate street. Since that time, we have had two children of our own. On Rutledge Avenue alone, there are now no fewer than 15 kids, all of whom we see passing our home on their way to the park. In our time here, we have seen our neighborhood become one that is active with the sound of kids playing all up and down the street.. The replacement of a hockey rink at Todd Park will serve several beneficial purposes. First, it will help. to make better use of the magnificent warming house - a facility which is sadly under - utilized. Second, it will help' Todd . Park to serve more fully as a year -round gathering spot for the families of this youthful neighborhood. An-d ,lastly, it will provide a free, full service public skating and hockey facility for children and adults in a neighborhood which does not currently have convenient access to such a spot. I urge the Park Board to vote in the affirmative in regard to this matter. It is a small expense which will reap rewards for many years to come, not only for the immediate neighborhood, but for the City of Edina as a whole. Thank Youl John M. Christensen. Amy Christensen Beck Christensen ILaine Christensen 4520 Rutledge Avenue Edina, MN 55436 952 -848 -7759 5/9/2005 Page 1 of 2, John Keprios From: Julie Labosky [labosky @earthlink.net] Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 4:50 PM To: John Keprios Subject: Todd Park Proprosed Hockey Rink Dear Mr. Keprios, It has come to our attention that the Park Board has been working very hard to determine the needs of Hockey rinks at our city's various parks. We are writing you to show our support in bringing back a hockey rink to Todd Park. The rink, with lights, was there when we moved into our home thirteen years ago, but was removed during the park renovations a few years ago. We used to take our then two year old to the park to skate, but quit when the hockey baords were removed and the ice wasn't as kept up. We would like to have a neighborhood park of similar quality to Highlands and Arden. We are very concerned the the people who live "on the park" have a feeling that the park is just for them. The park is for the community and our youth! Currently our children, ages 8 and 10 have to crossing Interlachen Blvd. and Mirror Lakes Road to go to a park where they can play a hockey game with friends. It is sad that they don't have a neighborhood park to skate at. The hockey boards are also important so that the kids who don't want to play with sticks and pucks, can enjoy skating in a safe environment. Ice rinks are such an important part of our community, and our parks provide the perfect environment for all residents to enjoy Minnesota's favorite winter sport! This past winter, our son's squirt hockey team practiced at Arden Park a couple of times a week from 8 -9pm. What a.beautiful and safe setting for kids to play a game they love. The nieghbors have embraced that park in a manner that sets an We actually need more outdoor rinks to accomodate the growing interest in youth hockey. What an amazing position Edina is in having the largest girls hockey program in the state! We need to provide our kids with a safe environment to play the game. Not every practice and/or hockey game can, nor should, be indoors. In addition to rinks for the hockey association, we need the hockey rinks for the kids who are not involved in organized hockey, but want to play with their friends in a "pick up" game. Why shouldn't they have a place to play at their neighborhood park? Thank you to you and the Park Board for all of your hard work on this and other issues. We appreciate all you do to make Edina's parks the top quality they are. Sincerely, John and Julie Labosky 3 Orchard Lane Edina, MN 55436 6/15/2005 Dear Mr. Keprios, It has come to our attention that you are thinking of changing the hockey rink plans for the city AFTER the Park Board voted 7 -1 to approve the Todd Park Hockey Rink. We don't understand why you would pull out of a neighborhood park that really needs hockey boards to become fully fimtioning again (the hockey boards have been gone maybe 5 -8 years ? ? ?)... especially when the Park Board voted FOR reinstalling boards. If our memories are correct, the Park Board is working on a plan for Lewis Park's ice rink(s), but in speaking with Park Board members, one park/rink does not replace the other and they are two separate plans. We are very concerned that the neighborhood served by Todd Park does not have a neighborhood skating rink that is usable for ALL neighborhood skaters. Do not think that the boards are just for hockey players. Our 8 year old daughter has no interest in playing hockey at this time. Yet, with the set up at Todd Park, we cannot take both of our kids to the park and skate because it is not conducive to have hockey games and free skating going on in the same space. It does not work to have figure skaters, hockey skaters, and beginner skaters on the same small ice surface. A park needs a separate area for kids to have a pick up hockey game (or more formal game) so other skaters don't get hurt and can enjoy skating with out having to worry about getting hit by a flying puck or run over by someone wanting to "make the play of the game ". Please return the hockey boards to Todd Park as recommended by the Park Board's vote in June. Below is our original letter that outlines many of our reasons for believing that Todd Park should have Hockey Boards REINSTALLED. We have included it for your review. Thank you. Sincerely, John and Julie Labosky 3 Orchard Lane Edina, MN 55436 John Keprios From: John Keprios Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 1:1.1 PM To: 'Cutler, Ken' Subject: RE: Todd Park Rink Ken: Thank you for your email. The Edina Hockey Association has asked that the Edina Park Board reconsider its use of resources for this coming skating season. EHA would prefer that the Park Board consider directing their limited resources to Lewis Park instead to accommodate the use of a Zamboni to resurface both hockey rinks. There is a special Park Board meeting tonight at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Edina City Hall. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. John Keprios, Director Edina Park & Recreation Department 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Voice:, (952) 826 -0430 Fax: (952) 826 -0385 jkeprios @ci.edina.mn.us - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Cutler, Ken [mailto: Cutler. Ken@dorsey.com] Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 4:57 PM To: John Keprios Subject: Todd Park Rink John, was very disappointed to hear that you no longer support the Todd Park Rink. I think it is very important that rinks be dispersed around the city to allow more neighborhood access to rinks. The best way to get kids off the couch and also away from being overscheduled is to have athletic facilities within walking distance of any as many kids as possible. We need to encourage unscheduled activity. A rink at Todd Park would help that. I fear that those neighbors who oppose the rink want to keep Todd Park as an underutilized park, which it is and has been since I have lived near there (since 1989). It should not be just the private preserve of the neighbors who border the park. Just as those who opposed the Todd Park rink admonished the park board to remember that it was the park board not the athletic board, I would say that the parks are for all the citizens of Edina not just those on Vandervork Avenue. Ken Cutler 19 Circle West Kenneth Cutler Dorsey & Whitney LLP 50 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 -1498 Phone: (612) 340 -2740 7/26/2005 Message John Keprios From: Bisson, Jeff Obisson @craig- hallum.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 12:21 PM To: John Keprios Cc: Pat Cronin; dick.miller @wellsfargo.com Subject: Todd Park Hockey Rink Importance: High Page 1 of 1 Hello, John. My name is Jeff Bisson and I live with my wife and two children on Cooper Avenue in the Hilldale neighborhood. For all of my childhood and early 20's I have called Vandervork Avenue and then Hollywood Road "home ". Suffice to say, I am and I have been a lifetime stakeholder of the Division (now Todd) Park community and I am writing to express my support of the proposed hockey rink. My memories of Division park are several and vivid. In the early 70's I played tonka toys on the old dirt road (now paved) that was the Vandervork cul -de -sac. My grade school friends and I spent hours watching men play softball and hit home runs into left field (the old hockey rink). Most importantly, I skated on the ice and warmed myself in the warming house there -- starting when I was two years old! Division Park's winters were vibrant. It was a true neighborhood park. You would meet all the kids there - -and their brothers and sisters too. That early experience has helped me realize what is a very magical part of Edina's mystique: when you grow up here you know most of the people your age, and all of their brothers and sisters as well. Lifetime friendships are formed that way. "Pick up" hockey games were frequent. Many Saturdays you could play several different games with many new faces as they came and went. Everyone was welcome to play. The warming house attendant was usually a teenager from the neighborhood and he would offer pop and candy for a quarter. Usually it was a guy on the varsity or junior varsity high school teams and at quiet times he would skate with us and show us some moves. It's how I grew to know the Hirsch boys, who were much older than us and whose parents still live on Division street. Then for many years, I watched sadly as the city removed the old boards, replaced the warming house, and basically eliminated hockey at the park. I suspected the rink removal was largely because there were no kids left in the neighborhood. Without therm the park always looked empty in the winter. But It seems the neighborhood cycle has come full swing - -the kids are back! In the summertime the park is full as they use the playground, tennis courts, and basketball courts. Wouldn't it be nice to have them around in the winter? Wouldn't it be great to keep them involved in the neighborhood- -not the mall - -when the snow comes? Wouldn't it be nice to develop the park as an asset for year round use? I strongly support the proposed hockey rink. With more kids and young families once again in the neighborhood the time is right to bring it back. I am certain it will develop the sense of community and relationships among the neighborhood kids that I, my brothers, and my friends gained. Please keep me apprised of all relevant mailings or notices as I intend to remain fully involved in this. My contact information is below. Regards, Jeff Bisson 9 Cooper Avenue Edina, MN 55436 952.229.4603 6/14/2005 John, I spoke with Jeff Bisson for about twenty minutes yesterday regarding the special Park Board meeting scheduled for this evening. He had just heard about the meeting and was unsure whether or not he could make it. In the event he cannot make the meeting he was hoping that his thoughts and feelings could'be shared. Ed - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Bisson, Jeff (mailto:jbisson @craig- hallum.com] Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 4:46 PM To: Ed MacHolda Subject: Todd Park: a few thoughts- - Importance: High Eddie - -great to touch base with you today... I am really amazed at the reconsideration of the rink at Todd. There are so many kids in that neighborhood now - - -I'd guess 3-4x as many as when I' grew up and the hockey rink there (Division, it was called) thrived. Certainly that kind of demographic should be compelling to use the beautiful (costly ?) facility there, for year round use? And I think consolidation of rinks (like a sheltered additional rink at Lewis), although nice, would actually decrease the community's overall interest in hockey. Access to rinks, like a local one at Todd, would spurn the pick -up games that are so much a part of building neighborhood fabric and vitalize the "feeder" system that continues to keep Edina a major Hockey city. From where did the opponents in the Todd Park neighborhood develop their belief of entitlement to the boards -free park? Someone should let our kids vote in this thing. I'd guarantee, a louder voice than those opposed, and I hate to think the adults deciding this let them down. Please share my note with John and the rest of the board. Thanks. Jeff Bisson Vice President, Institutional Sales Craig - Hallum Capital Group, LLC Telephone: 612.334.6327 Email: jbisson @craighallum.com AOL IM: chjbisson 222 South Ninth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 John Keprios --om: Crosby, David [david.crosby @leonard.comj nt: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 9:05 AM o: John Keprios Subject: Todd Park Initiative Mr. Keprios: My name is David Crosby. I am an Edina resident living on 44th Street between Browndale and Wooddale Avenues. Recently, I saw.that Edina was considering adding a hockey rink at Todd Park. Being the father of two young boys (both active skaters) I was very excited about the prospect of such a rink. We enjoy using Todd Park in the summer (we have twice rented the "warming house" for summer birthday parties) but have not used the facility in the winter, mainly because of the lack of a larger ice /hockey surface. It seems a shame to have such a fine park underused for much of the year. I now understand the concept for a rink at Todd Park may be in jeopardy. I urge you to support the Todd Park Rink. Youth hockey and skating is strong Edina tradition, and is near and dear to most of our hearts. (Indeed, 30 years ago I happened to be photographed carrying the puck at Arden Park as a first -grade Mite by Sports Illustrated in a feature story about Minnesota outdoor hockey - -so the issue is especially close for me.) Given the continued interest in youth hockey (including the growth of girls, teams), this is the time for Edina to invest in more rinks, at locations that will benefit primarily Edina residents (as opposed to persons from neighboring communities). Thanks for your consideration. David Crosby 405 W. 44th Street 52.926.6869 David R. Crosby Leonard, Street and Deinard Professional Association 150 South Fifth Street Suite 2300 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 www.leonard.com Dear Mr. Keprios: I am writing to you in support for the hockey rink at Todd Park. We live in the Hilldale neighborhood at 23 Circle West, and I have three children who all love winter, skating and hockey (not necessarily in that order!). It is a shame that our park is not being used all year with such a beautiful warming house and the money the city has invested in it. A hockey rink with boards would be a great neighborhood building addition and would make Todd Park a gathering place for the kids in Hilldale and the Todd Park neighborhood, all year round. We have so many kids here that would love to be able to use the hockey rink and we could have fun winter parties there. It's been so sad to watch it go unused all winter since we don't have boards. Please bring back the hockey rink and the Edina tradition to our neighborhood. I encourage you to support the addition of the hockey rink at Todd Park. It would be a wonderful addition for our neighborhood and all the kids.and families who live here! Sincerely, Michele Sit 23 Circle West Edina, MN 55436 Page 1 of 1 John Keprios From: RJSMMS @aol.com Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 8:13 AM To: John Keprios Subject: Ice Rink at Todd Park Dear Mr. Keprios: It has come to my attention that you have called an unexpected meeting of the Park and Rec. Board to discuss the already approved ice rink for Todd Park. I believe the Board voted 7 -1 to approve the neighborhood rink after hearing from our entire Todd Park neighborhood. Everyone that has kids that skate knows that the rink at Lewis park is not used primarily by Edina residents. I don't understand how you can possibly support adding an additional rink there and not also adding a neighborhood hockey rink at Todd Park. The only people that object to the ice rink at Todd park are a handful of people who live immediately adjacent to the park. You saw for yourself the support of the surrounding neighborhood to return the .ice rink to Todd. Our neighborhood is exploding with young families and we need a community rink! Personally I'm still shocked at the $250,000 price tag for the warming house you built at the park, but now that you've already built it, it's imperative that it gets used. To see it sit empty all winter with only an ice attendant in it doing his /her homework, is a gross waste of public funds. We will never be able to justify the cost of that building if we don't allow a hockey rink to be rebuilt and have Todd Park once again become a community hub of activity all winter long. Kids and families will not use the park if there are not boards. We already know that is a fact. If the city builds the hockey rink, the park will be used to it's potential and the money on the warming house will not have been wasted. Please reconsider your sole lack of support for building a rink at Todd Park. Our neighborhood is young and growing, and you have the opportunity to help build a rink that would provide an entirely new generation with great winter memories of walking to their ice rink and enjoying Minnesota's wonderful winter sport. Please don't listen to a very small minority of people who knew they lived adjacent to a community park when they purchased their homes. The rinks are part of Edina's heritage and not an eyesore. Please reconsider and represent the many more families who will benefit from healthy, outdoor recreational activities. That should be the primary goal of your department. It seems very unfair to call an emergency meeting without notifying the community, especially after the very clear vote of the Park and Rec. board. Thank you for considering these points and for the difficult job you have. Respectfully submitted, Michele Sit 23 Circle West Edina, MN 55436 952 - 928 -0887 7/26/2005 Dear John, I live at 23 Cooper Circle, approximately 0.3 miles away from Todd Park. I attended the 6/14 meeting regarding the potential addition of a hockey rink to Todd Park My kids are not hockey players. They are ski racers. When they do have some free time in the winter they really enjoy playing "pick -up" hockey. I am a strong supporter of the rink. My kids and I currently use other rinks. Often driving right by Todd. I have lived at 23 Cooper for 13 years and I have often wondered why the city does not have hockey boards at Todd. It seems to be an underutilized asset. With the current shelter, a skating rink and an attendant 5 days per week the extra capital to put in hockey boards is minimal. I believe a hockey rink is not only a prudent use of the city's resources (in all respects — financial, human, and natural) but also a huge benefit to the neighborhood in the winter. At the June 16th meeting, concern was brought up of loss of green space.:I question this loss when the park is full of man made structures. It currently has a shelter, basketball court, softball ' field w /fencing, tennis court w /fencing, and playground equipment. I find the argument that hockey boards will greatly impact the "green space" weak. Since this issue of hockey boards has come up, I have paid close attention to the use of the park. I pass it at least once a day in the summer. The space where the hockey boards would be located rarely is used by people in the park. The use is focused on the capital the city has put into the park (the man made structures) — tennis court, basketball courts, playground, and softball field. I believe the capital put into the park in the form of a hockey boards would fully utilize the asset of the park in the winter. A thought that is off the subject, yet something I have noticed is that additional space could be achieved by cutting down some low quality trees (cottonwood and willow) on the east side of the park. I was under the impression from the June 16th meeting that it was concluded that the Lewis Park refrigerated rink was a separate decision not an alternative to Todd Park. I find that the potential capital needed for a refrigerated rink, that would be available only part of the year, quite different than putting in hockey boards at Todd Park. Lewis Park seems to be an alternative to another sheet of ice at Braemar not a replacement for the lost rink at Countryside. In addition, all of these matters aside, adding hockey boards to Todd Park would be a wonderful addition to the neighborhood. Adding a place for the kids and families in the neighborhood to not only gather in the winter but also a place for memories to be built. Sincerely, Nick Cronin Guides for the journey. Piper Jaffray & Co. Since 1895. Member SIPC and NYSE. Learn more at pipedaffray.com. Piper Jaffray corporate headquarters is located at 800 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis, MN 55402 Page 1 of 1 John Keprios From: Todd Willmert [twillmert@hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, May 09, 200512:09 PM To: John Keprios Subject: Todd Park Dear John Thanks for soliciting input on the Todd Park hockey rink. We skated there several times last winter, you are right, the facility is underutilized. I think the hockey rink would be a nice addition. Todd Willmert Find e-mail and documents on your PC instantly with the new MSN Search Toolbar —FREE 5/9/2005 In response to your April 7'05 Memo, regarding the proposal to place an outdoor hockey rink at Todd Park, please consider this as our support. I feel that all of the reasons listed in the memo are valid. We enjoy the park, especially the warning house when skating at the informal rink. A nicer hockey rink would be a great addition. Mike Woolsey 4536 Rutledge Ave Edina MN 55436 922 -0487 Page 1 of 1 John Keprios From: Susan Kelly [susanjkelly @earthlink.net] Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 12:28 PM To: John Keprios Subject: Proposed Todd Park Hockey Rink It has recently come to our attention that there is some controversy over the proposed Todd Park Hockey Rink. We wanted to take this opportunity to voice our support of the proposal. We have lived in the Todd Park neighborhood for over 15 years. Both of our grown children skated at the Todd Park rink and when they were older, worked there as Ice Rink Attendants. We are aware that in the past, the ice rink has not gotten a lot of use, but we feel that this is mainly because there hasn't been a hockey rink there. Many of the negative opinions voiced over the proposed rink seem to be focusing on the desire not to have increased usage of the park. We feel that this argument goes against the purpose of having the city parks in the first place. The parks are there to be used and enjoyed. To our knowledge, there has never been any major problems in the summer months with people using the softball field, soccer area, playground or basketball court. And we don't believe that increased usage of the park during the winter months would be any different. On the contrary, we feel that the more opportunities that children have available for positive activities, the better, whether these children are from Edina or neighboring areas. It appears that some people in our neighborhood view Todd Park as a private park for their use only. If every neighborhood in Edina resisted the addition of rinks and ball fields in their parks, our children would have no where to play. We would also like to add that we are aware that some of the home owners immediately surrounding the park have been opposed to the addition of a parking lot in the grassy area adjacent to the basketball courts. In the summer months, the lack of available parking results in cars parked on both sides of both Division St. and Vandervork Ave. There are children running back and forth across the streets and between the cars all the time. Not only does this pose a safety concern, it is also not very aesthetically pleasing to see cars lined up and down the street all summer. A parking lot in this never used, grassy area would be a positive addition. The vocal negative response you have gotten regarding this proposed rink is not necessarily the opinion of the majority. There are many of us who feel this would be a positive addition to our park. Sincerely, Charlie and Sue Kelly 4513 Vandervork Avenue Edina Susan Kelly - -- Susan, -key a)earthlink.net - -- EarthLink: The #1 provider of the Real Internet. 5/18/2005 Page 1 of 1 John Keprios From: Susan Kelly [susanjkelly @earthlink.net] Sent: . Monday, July 25, 2005 9:33 PM To: John Keprios Subject: Todd Park Hockey Rink proposal It has come to our attention that despite a 7 -1 vote by the Park Board to install a hockey rink at Todd Park, you are now considering a second rink at Lewis Park as an alternative. We, along with many others in our neighborhood, strongly support the Park Board's vote to put the rink at Todd Park. It does not seem appropriate that some of the residents immediately surrounding the park be able to dictate how that park is to be used by the entire community it serves. If the argument against the rink was more substantial than it isn't pretty to look at, we might be sympathetic to those opposed. As it is, this seems to be the underlying reason why those against it do not want the rink. We have not heard one legitimate reason why the rink should not be,put at.Todd, but we have heard many great reasons why it should be put there. Lewis Park is a long way from our neighborhood. .I don't think there are many kids or families in our area who would use that rink. Right now, kids in our neighborhood have no hockey rink they can go to without a ride. What we suspect a lot of them are and will be doing instead is hiking into the woods behind the park to party.. Lets give them something constructive to do after school and on the weekends. Please. Charlie and Susan Kelly 4513 Vandervork Avenue - -- Susan Kelly - -- susanjkelly@earthlink.net - -- EarthLink: The #1 provider of the Real Internet. 7/26/2005 We live right up the street from Todd Park, and are concerned about the noise and traffic from the hockey groups, especially when they are leaving after 9:00 p.m. weekdays. Other than that, we do not have objections to the proposal. Nancy and Jack Nichols 4524 Parkside Lane May 8, 2005 Dear John, Thank you for asking for input on the proposed plan to add hockey at Todd Park. As homeowners living directly across the street from the park, we are strongly opposed to this idea for the following reasons: 1) 1) There is no parking or drop -off circle at Todd Park. Parents waiting to drop off and pick up their youngsters would be idling on the street and creating a significant traffic hazard. 2) 2) The lighting from the ice rink is directed at our bedroom windows. This is tolerable two or three nights a week but would be unwelcome every night. 3) 3) - Ice rink maintenance takes place around 4:30 am and is extremely noisy now, as it involves trucks reversing and blaring of back up alarms. A hockey rink would increase this disturbance unreasonably. In addition I find it curious that your letter cites "due to Todd Park's location,...a hockey rink will .likely attract mainly residents and serve the immediate neighborhood" since this park sustains a steady stream of drive -by basketball and softball playing in the warm months. I don't believe these people have been surveyed, but it would be my estimate that at least half come from St. Louis Park, which the park borders, and Minneapolis. My informal queries at the playground have taught me that many families from the Brookside neighborhood of St. Louis Park use Todd Park regularly. Since your stated purpose is to "help meet the demand for hockey rink practice time" and this demand is coming largely from outside the area it is clear that your assertion is false, and we residents would bear the brunt of the increased noise, traffic and disturbance that a hockey rink in this small park would inevitably bring from outside the neighborhood. We residents already put up with people from outside the neighborhood parking on the street, playing basketball, softball, baseball and sometimes golf (which is not allowed, but not enforced) during the warm months, with no parking area or soundproofing and inadequate fencing so that people chase balls up our lawns as it is. Must we be burdened during the winter months too? The usable area of Todd Park is very small, and it is absolutely unacceptable that this neighborhood park should be forced to serve the needs of the entire community. In summary, I would urge the Park Board members to spend some time at the park during the day and ask the people'who use the park what we would like to see. This park is in constant use from early morning until late at night all year round. Instead of forcing us to take on the burden of the use you deem practical, I would rather see a winter playground program during school break or after school since this neighborhood has far more young children than hockey players. The park shelter building would be an excellent base for ecology based winter nature. programs, rather than increasing the destruction to the park and fragile creek watershed. This neighborhood has demonstrated our willingness to help with buckthorn elimination and park upkeep. I urge you to respect our position and not commit the immoral act of bringing hockey to our park. Thank you for your attention. I look forward to attending the meeting on May 10`x'. Sincerely, Janet Ha 4500 Parkside Lane jha@,mn.rr.com John Keprios From: rieggott @arborcap.com Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 10:20 AM To: John Keprios Subject: Todd Park Hockey Rink John As a resident of the Todd Park neighborhood for 13 years I would appreciate your support of putting in a hockey rink at the park. Your consideration and support of this effort is important to many of us with young families in the neighborhood. Thanks in advance. Respectfully yours, Rick Leggott 6 Spur Road Pagel of 2 John Keprios From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 1:13 PM To: John Keprios Subject: FW: Todd Park comments -- please forward to Park Board Members - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Gretasimll @aol.com [mailto:Gretasimll @ aol.com] Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 1:11 PM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: Todd Park comments -- please forward to Park Board Members My name is Greta Simondet and I live at 4448 Vandervork. Before you vote Tuesday, I hope you review these reasons against putting in a permanent hockey structure and parking lot. 1) 1 don't want the "green space" charm to be turned into an eyesore with an all- year -long hockey structure and parking lot just for the convenience of a select few people for approximately 2 months maximum per year. 2) Upgrading this is a big expense which will be ongoing because of increased maintenance costs. The expense of new structures seems to end up being higher than estimated. Considering other pressing issues where tax money could be spent, this seems frivolous to me. Two months of hockey - playing enjoyed by a few people doesn't seem to be a good priority in these times of limited funds. Please put this into perspective as far as community dollars which are received through taxation. 3) Please look at other sites that already have parking lots and look at parks that are not so closely surrounded by homes. Each board member should also consider the "not in my backyard" comment and see if they are personally motivated by insisting on bringing this rink and lot to Todd Park versus where they live. 4) It still seems to me to be more of a hockey association problem rather than Edina Park Board problem. 5) Please look at other sites more centrally located in Edina if this is to benefit Edina's kids. Regarding the issue of who uses the park, the board explained it as a community playfield. People from other cities do use Todd Park and you could be pretty certain they would utilize any hockey facility. 6) It sounded rather noble to have the intention of wanting to help even just one kid discover that he /she is talented in hockey who might otherwise have not had the chance if we do not build the structure & lot. Yet I can think of many more noble purposes for one's life and even other more enjoyable, less expensive pastimes and sports that this individual could put his /her talents and efforts into and this individual might as a result end up doing something far more spectacular with her /his live besides play hockey. 7) You said you listened to the neighborhood regarding a walking path around the perimeter of the park. Please listen this time, too. Why would we have wanted a walkway if we knew that it moseyed on by a parking lot and hockey structure? It just wouldn't be the same. 8) The location of the parking lot would interfere with the basketball court, and errant balls could cause dents in cars. 9) Yes, you do need to consider the parking lot even if it is not your committee's authority because it was stated in a previous Park Board Meeting that they both come as a package. So my reasons against a parking lot should also be considered as reasons against the hockey structure. 10) The parking lot is a hard surface that should be checked out with other authorities as far as the impact on the environment. 11) How can you determine in one week if ice quality is a serious issue? Shouldn't this involve a more scientific study? How can you vote with incomplete information? I would consider that misuse of tax dollars. 12) Maintenance costs could be much larger than anticipated due to ice quality problems. Therefore, spend the money at another rink where you're looking at a different facility involving "refrigeration ". 13) It seemed to be implied that the beautiful warming house was built and subsequently underutilized. One citizen said the neighborhood had asked for a gazebo and this warming house was built. The warming house does seem to be utilized for rental parties and the bathrooms throughout the year. Even so, this should not impact a decision on whether or not to build. 14) Traffic is a huge issue. It was mentioned at the meeting that traffic is an issue everywhere. If you are concerned for the safety of kids, please consider: a) The hill on Vandervork is a problem in winter. People cannot stop going north at the stop sign for Division Street even when road conditions are good else- MANOR Page 2 of 2 - where. b) People ignore the 4- way -stop sign and go 30 - 40 mph. Do you really want a parking lot there and increase traffic to that corner where the danger is greatest? c). Traffic will increase during the winter months - -it won't be just the teams who play there - -it will be outsiders and people who drive themselves to the location. d) As a mother, I do think parking on the street is safer than a parking lot because children tend to be less careful in parking lots rather than when they are on the street and have to stop and look both ways. And) wonder about the view behind large SUV's when the driver is trying to back up out of a spot in a crowded parking lot. e) On Sunday, May 15, 1 counted approximately 40 people eating at the park and 14 cars on the east side of Vandervork. My point is that the parking lot really doesn't seem to be needed, and I am against it and the rink because they need to be considered together. f) We live on the corner of Division and Vandervork and have never had an issue with parking that occurs across the street from us besides the fact that garbage is sometimes left on the street. 15) The noise associated with hockey rinks will very likely be irritating to the entire neighborhood including the apartments /condos. Please vote against the hockey rink in Todd Parkl Thank youl 5/16/2005 Mr. Keprios- My name is John Aronson. My address is 4440 Vandervork Avenue. I live right across the street from Todd Park. I am not a long time resident of Edina. My wife and I bought the house in June of 2003. We moved from Minneapolis and forever I have heard about the services, amenities and concern that Edina has for its citizens. Up to this point I am very impressed and a believer of all that I have heard. That includes the May Park Board Meeting that my wife and I attended. You are to be commended for alerting the citizens in advance of the plans for building a rink and being a voice of reason at that meeting. I am not opposed to youth athletics as I have coached my kids for many years in various sports and traveling leagues in Minneapolis. In fact, .I am not totally opposed to a 3 month hockey rink that is removable. However, had my wife and I known that a permanent hockey rink to include a parking lot was planned we would probably not have purchased our house. We were.struck by the beauty and greenery of this park and the view that it offered us when the purchase was made. Since the May meeting I have paid close attention to the park and the useage of it.. There is no question that this is a neighborhood park that is in constant use without extensive auto traffic. Also, I was struck by how small it 'really is. The useage of a hockey rink comes and goes. A concrete parking lot, most likely with lighting, that becomes the view out of the front of my house with additional traffic is permanent. All of our homes on Vandervork Avenue would literally be on top of this lot and in my opinion diminish the value of my property and the quality of life that we enjoy now. I will be unable to attend the June 14 meeting but I urge you to reconsider your decision to put in a permanent structure in Todd Park. I was unable to find the e- mail addresses of the Board or the the Chair. Please feel free to forward my message. John & Judy Aronson 4440 Vandervork Avenue 952 - 920 -8713 Sir: I received your memo regarding the proposal to rebuild the ice rink at Todd Park and am responding to you as requested. My husband and I have resided in the Brookside - Thielen neighborhood for over twenty -three years. During most of that time we raised two children who enjoyed years of the Todd Park ice rink - even when it was in its worst condition. The rink as well as the whole .park (tennis courts, baseball field, open field, and running path) is a real asset to our community. Edina spent good and welcomed dollars to build a warming /recreation cottage; I am unsure how often it is used. Rebuilding the ice rink might very well make better use of the building than letting it sit empty for much of the year. I am willing to support the installation of a good, save, and well maintained rink so that other generations of neighborhood children can enjoy this asset. Thank you for examining the need for rejuvenating the Todd Park rink. Sincererly, Nancy B Webster 4381 Thielen Avenue Edina MN 55436 952 - 929 -3971 I forgot to add to my response to your request for Todd Park rink support. PLEASE don't just make it a hockey rink. Recreational skating is enjoyed by many of us adults as well as children. Hockey isn't the only game that can be played on ice - broom ball and spink - non -skate games are played, too! Nancy B Webster .. . To: John Keprios, Director From: Richard Flumerfelt, Citizen 5225 Division Street Edina 55436+1412 952 - 929 -2114 Date: May 09, 2005 Re: PROPOSED HOCKEY RINK AT TODD PARK When considering development of Todd Park, it is prudent to reflect upon it's origin. Todd Park is a filled wetland and as such retains wetland properties, such as poor drainage and water percolating to the surface in wet years. The recollection of an outdoor hockey rink at Todd Park in years past is correct. Perhaps there is no recollection of why the hockey rink was abandoned. At that time, there was normal to high precipitation and the water table was high. Ground water percolated up thru the ice creating domes of brown ice rendering skating difficult to hazardous. It was requested that a Zamboni be brought in to level the ice sheet, but this proved to be impractical. The brown ice puddles had appeared for years in other skating areas in Todd Park before the construction of the hockey rink and they will reappear again if the water table is high. The Park and Recreation Department is to be commended for their efforts to provide the community with adequate and pleasant facilities using the resources available. Continue to be prudent and not grab defeat from the Jaws of victory. Page 1 of•1 John Keprios From: Tim Livingston [timlivingston@visi.com] Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 2:33 PM To: John Keprios Subject: Proposed Hockey Rink at Todd Park Dear Mr. Keprios, I appreciate your memo regarding the proposed Hockey rink at Todd Park. As much as I would like to see additional activity during the winter months at Todd Park, I do not agree that placing a permanent structure in the park is the way to go about achieving that goal. I am not-in favor of placing a hockey rink at Todd Park. It would greatly impact the natural beauty of the open space all year long. It would hinder the use of the.park during the months when a wide open space is7 appealing for playing ball, flying kites and having neighborhood *get- togethers. We e had several neighborhood events, attended by many residents, where the open space is well used for hunting for-eggs, or playing soccer. - The ice -' skating season at Todd Park has been mid- to late December until mid- February. That is two months of usage at best. To impact the park so greatly by placing a permanent structure in the middle of it that would be used for only two months of the year is not a good use of the space. As for using the shelter building during the winter, consider offering park programs during the school breaks, or a weekly preschool nature program. I think there are many creative ways to use the building for the public. I also believe that if the rental fee were lowered, you would generate more private usage. I continue to believe that the public shelter building should be open and free to public use for events that are held for the neighborhood residents. That would provide real and immediate value to the residents, without cost to the city. And in fact, we only know that the building is underutilized during the time when it is staffed. As for how many younger children are skating during the day, or how many people come during the unstaffed time on evenings or weekends, I'm sure there is no way of counting. I do know that my family skated there several times this past season, and the building was staffed on only two of those occasions. Please do not change the wonderful wide open space that we enjoy so much throughout the year at Todd Park. Thank you for the opportunity to provide input regarding this proposal. Sincerely, Jennifer Livingston, 4544 Parkside Lane 5/5/2005 To: James Hovland; Mayor, City of Edina CC: Scot Housch, City Council Member (w /o attachments) Alice Hulbert, City Council Member (w /o attachments) Linda Masica, City Council Member (w /o attachments) Ann Swenson, City Council Member (w /o attachments) John Keprios, Director Edina Park & Recreation Department (w /o attachments) From: Tim Meehan Date: August 12, 2005 Re: PROPOSED HOCKEY RINK AT L.TEA TODD PARK On behalf of a number of Edina residents I offer the attached petition in opposition of the Park Board's proposal to establish a permanent hockey rink in Todd Park. I've attached 153 original signatures of Edina residents of legal age. I may have additional signatures at the time of the City Council meeting on August 16, 2005. If so I will supplement the numbers at that time. Feel free to call me at 952.457.5953 if you have any questions on this petition in advance of the meeting. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. To: James Hovland, Mayor Scot Housch, City Council Member Alice Hulbert, City Council Member Linda Masica, City Council Member Ann Swenson, City Council Member CC: John Keprios, Director Edina Park & Recreation Department From: CONCERNED NEIGHBORS OF TODD PARK Date: August 1, 2005 Re: PROPOSED HOCKEY, RINK AT L. TEA TODD PARK The undersigned neighbors of T. Lea Todd Park place a high value on the minimal amount of green space remaining in the Park. We strongly object to any development of the Park that would encroach on or eliminate any of the Park's existing green space, including the Edina Park Board's proposal to construct a hockey rink in the Park. • � 1 1' 191/;, 0-11 z, r/0010,11 �l rJ 10161 11 FAMEM C 1 1' Ma �-W4 i I ON, + � / t F/ In F, d"I el ON p` C 1 � " W�4 - 42 WIN- t I d� M14 6 . � 4 _ ���� Lam` /i ►� I - ;ml i a RE �r 1 1' N � - � Si • I r r )NOWN Wit. 2�0711X i i 0, � mn7,w.,- I rip's a RE �r E NAME ADDRESS &JAA A ukeltz "`-&-1 Ahk,%�Ll- PAK- c'" NAME DDR Eaa r Si � y ,,,NAME ADDRESS O j-v w cax .lJ AV-f, c4. ,it/ Y 3 /Liu Y.f ' .$. �3 12 *nom Al S�13 , � ys36 ox)�07 4e s �� Sy &fz)r eD 533a t bk�x Aye. �-sy,3 NAME ADDRESS G� G�L�fi 'e,-- Q i✓C I . k& 4 �f. `f�13 �ix� -� �• ya6 "fAce &L 2 As I'll- NAME ADDRESS fWI4 yy�� Val lit; I 1 J 13� NAME A J)REca Al 220�� 5Z2-c-) fedzar IZ2 ` 15�l 7 " 5z1� 1 -- JCA Cd Ue S ZZ� C(l `4. Subject: Todd Park Dear.City Council Member, I felt compelled to write a brief letter for the current Todd Park issue regarding the boards after a person who is against placing the hockey boards at the Todd Park ice -rink came to my house looking for a signature. After I told her I was in favor of the boards, because I thought it would be a great addition to the neighborhood park and something the kids could truly enjoy, she walked away from my door without saying a word. I could tell she was not happy. So I thought maybe this is something I should pay attention too since the opposition is so strong. She basically didn't understand where. I was coming from and how I felt because she didn't have the real life experience I had growing up near a park with a hockey rink and boards. So I felt a need to share my story with you in case it makes a difference. I am 43 yrs old and grew up skating in Bloomington from the age of 3 to 10 at what now is Hrbek Fields. When I was 10 yrs old we moved to Edina and the adjustment was tough for me because ... now I was a cake-eater ... to my friends in Bloomington. I was rather shy and insecure but found comfort when I was able to walk to Cornelia Park and skate with the neighborhood kids at the "rink ". I would go just about everyday after school crossing W. 70th Street with my skates and stick in hand. I would meet the boys that were playing hockey and I quickly found new friends which made my adjustment easier. The years went on and I continued to walk to Cornelia to skate and play hockey with the locals - we grew up together. Some players were eventual varsity players but most were not, they just-took pride in the fact that they played hockey and were "rink rats ". It provided for them exercise and sense of what it would be like to play in a real game. We had many Stanley Cup game 7's down there. On a Saturday, my Mom would pack a lunch for me, give me money for a soda, make sure I was dressed properly send me out the door and tell me to have fun ... it was a bonding experience for us. When I was young, I remember walking to the hockey rink at night, in the dark across the playground, faster and faster because I could hear the pucks hitting the boards then echoing thru the crisp winter night, the lights lit up the night. The game was on and all I wanted to do was play. Afterwards, then going home and telling my Mom that I had lifted the puck "this high" and I saw the black puck mark on the boards. I'm sure my smile was a mile wide. Junior High was a challenging time for me much like it was for you. I had many friends but not many close friends and it seemed like I was always on the C or B team for hockey. I usually got cut from the travelling team my first year, cried and then went to skate at Cornelia to get better. I found peace and happiness when I was playing hockey outside at the Cornelia Hockey rink. I learned later on that it helped shape my life and molded my personality. It was a place (Cornelia rink) where I could express myself, laugh, imagine, exercise and gain confidence in who I was. I was growing up. When I was a Sophomore I made JV hockey for Edina East. I ended up playing varsity for three years and won two State Championships for Willard Ikola's team. I was Captain my senior year. I earned a college hockey scholarship and saw a lot of the World because I was able to develop my skills at the local hockey rink. Finding myself as a person and an athelete, thru my experiences at the rink, enabled me to be a recognized member of my community and thus meet people like Scot Housh, Jeff Johnson, Jeff Sorem and others who care for and get involved in our development as a city. My peers who I have come to respect and admire. Truly; this isn't about me (which is why I didn't sign this) but I think it helps to understand that the park "boards" are more than just the boards. It isn't about developing an overcrowded area, or busy streets with lots of parked cars ( I would be more concerned about pulling onto Interlachen Blvd off of Brookside) or the water truck that comes by at 4 am, or the ice is no good ( I still skate there today about 15 times per Winter and the ice is actually better than most of the others I play on) or riff -raff now coming. It is about individuals like me who have had their life changed by something so simple. It is about the children. Not about the adults that say the boards will be an eye -sore and crowd the park. These are realistic adult things that I understand but really more inconveniences for some. I think It is about giving our kids a better quality of life, not so much to play varsity hockey, but to find out who they are as a person and what they can become as a good human being. It is not the same thing when your Mom has to drive you to another park to play and I think we all know we do a little too much of this nowadays anyway. Furthermore, I believe the opposition will say they have hundreds of signatures, but my words, they seemed pretty persuasive and it sounded more like the City was putting a Starbucks there. 1 could see how some older folks that lived in the area would sign the list. Yes, the objections have some merit. But imagine if you will that a young boy /girl, who's parents just got divorced, whom lives with his Mom who works till 5 pm ...found out that he could walk to the (Todd) park and play hockey with some of his neighborhood friends after school... on a real life rink. Instead of playing video games and maybe getting caught up in some other issues he walked to the park to play hockey. Eventually ended up being pretty good, played in college and ended up being a doctor. Sounds crazy but it happened and I played with the fella. He told me one day years ago that if it wasn't for hockey and playing outside as a kid he would have ended up a being a different person. You see, this is more about life than it is about the boards. When my young daughter asked me why someone didn't want the hockey boards down at the park the reasons I gave to her - from what I have learned - sounded like selfish adult reasons that she just couldn't understand. The other day she asked me to teach her how to play and I imagined how we would practice our skills at the "rink" then walk home together. 'I only hope my daughter and her neighborhood friends'can have the same type of experience in life that I had from something so simple. Thank you for your time and consideration and for all you do for our community. Rutledge Avenue 1 block from Todd Park Page 1 of 1 Darlene Wallin From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 8:58 AM To: Darlene Wallin Subject: FW: City Council Members - Hockey Boards at Todd Park and other parks From: Ed Janssen [ mailto: Ejanssen @itascabusinesscredit.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 8:59 AM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: City Council Members - Hockey Boards at Todd Park and other parks I would like to voice my support for putting in boards at Todd Park. I can understand the Todd Park neighbors concerns, but I think we have to take in to consideration the benefits to our kids, as well as the big picture of overall property values. Hockey is a great outdoor activity for the kids. And, Edina is known for the quality of its outdoor ice, which is one more thing that makes Edina an attractive place to live. My son and hockey player is grown and seldom uses the outdoor rinks. I am voicing this support based on personal experience. I have noticed that the boards have been removed from Countryside, but I do not see any evidence that new boards are being put in. If we are not putting in new boards at CSide, that is even more reason to put them in at Todd. We should not be reducing the number of hockey rinks at a time when our association, both boys and girls, is growing. Ed Janssen 5708 Long Brake Tr. Edina, MN 55439 This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email Security System. 8/16/2005 MEMORANDUM DATE: August 15, 2005 TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Darlene Wallin SUBJECT: VOICE MAIL MESSAGE FROM PAUL CARTER Paul Carter, Antrim Road, left a voice mail message that he is in favor of a hockey rink at Lewis Park. He stated there is less congestion at Lewis Park as well as more parking available. AGENDA ITEM: VI.B. August 12, 2005 Mayor Jim Hovland Edina City Council 4801 W. 50'' Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Hovland We are writing because we are hoping that the City Council will decide against putting a permanent hockey rink in Todd Park. This is a very quiet area and many of us have enjoyed the beauty of the park for a great many years. To put an unsightly hockey rink with boards in the middle of the park would be a disgrace. Most of the residents who use and enjoy the park are retired people in the condos to the north and many of the people in the neighborhood either are retired or are empty nesters. About the only time our serenity is disturbed is when the teens that use the park for softball race up and down our street in their cars. Even when there is a skating rink in the park, it is seldom used. We understand that the Edina Hockey League does not want a rink at Todd Park and there are other areas that would welcome the rink. Why is this being forced on the Todd Park area? Please share our opinion with the city council and let us keep our beautiful park just the way it is. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, _ Ron and Maureen Phillips 4525 Parkside Lane Edina, MN 55424 DATE: Monday, August 15, 2005 TO: Edina City Council Members... Scott Housh, Alice Hulbert, Ann Swenson, Linda Masks FROM: Concerned taxpaying parents in Edina Community RE: THE NEED OF BOARDED ICE RINKS EDINA FOR EHA CHILDREN TO USE (Where there are existing warming houses) To Whom it May Concern at City Hall: • We are families in Edina, who have children that play hockey through the Edina Hockey Association program, we are 1,000 families strong. • There are over 1200 Edina boys & girls that play hockey through the EHA that are in need places to skate throughout the Nov. through March hockey season. • Currently, due to the shortage of indoor and outdoor ice rinks in Edina, parents are forced to drive to Parade Stadium in Mpls., and Mariucci & Ridder Arenas at the U of M for ice time for kids as young as 1 ' graders. • We are in support of the unanimous recommendation of the Edina Park Board to utilize Todd Park as an additional needed outdoor boarded hockey rink. Currently Todd Park neighbors have voiced strong opposition to having boards installed there. • Any Edina parks with existing warming houses that tax payers have paid for should have boarded hockey rinks for the use of tax paying citizens in Edina. organized and unorganized sports. • City Council Members to contact if you can't attend the meeting: Scott Housh Alice Hulbert Linda Masica Ann Swenson (763) 302 -7174 (952) 942 -5615 (952) 942 -6770 (952) 927 -7524 Please join us & make your support known at the City Council Meeting at 7PM On Tuesday, Aug. 16, 2005 Location - Edina City Hall Bring your children wearing their Edina Hornet Jerseys! z•d ebo :TT so sT 2nd Page 1 of 1 Communications Intern From: mary lawrence [maryvlaw @msn.com] Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 1:48 PM To: Communications Intern Subject: please forward to edina city council members I am opposed to the selection of Todd Park for a permanent hockey rink and any other development that would eliminate Todd Park's green space. The green space of the Park is too small to crowd an additional permanent structure into it. Permanent hockey boards at the Park will detract from the Park's natural beauty. Having grown up in Edina, I used to see all the rinks filled with hockey and skating. I am always amazed now when I drive past the creek valley rink to see how little it is used. Our tax dollars could be better spent in other areas of improvement to our park (ie., planting of new trees, upgrade the baseball field, drainage, etc.) Sincerely Mary Lawrence 952 -944 -7033 5613 McGuire Road Edina 8/15/2005 AGENDA ITEM: VI.B. Darlene Wallin From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 12:29 PM To: Darlene Wallin Subject: FW: closing of ice rinksl - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Randal Harrington [mailto:randalh@mac.com) Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 12:27 PM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Cc: Jill Trautz Subject: closing of ice rinksl Please pass this note on to the city council for tonight's meeting: This past winter we saw a dramatic increase in the number of kids involved in skating (hockey and figure skating). EHA started new programs for the very young player (mite level) and the number of all girl teams continues to rise. As a result, the ice time is becoming very difficult to obtain. On numerous occasions I had to drive my sons (in 5 and 7th grade) to late evening practices as far as Richfield, Parade or even St Paul. This was not a rare event, but a very common occurrence. To reduce these out of the area practices, coaches have started to make heavy use of the outdoor rinks. This is great, excepting that on numerous occasions last year, my kids could not find an open outdoor rink because they had all been reserved for teams! I can't tell you the number of times we drove around edina just looking for a place to skate. Now, I just found out that the rink at Countryside will not be replaced for next year! I also discovered that the rink at Todd Park may or may not be built depending on tonight's vote. Please consider the closing of countryside in your decision. Ultimately, I believe we need both Todd and Countryside as well as any other rinks that already have warming huts. Thanks for you consideration. Rand, Kath, Joey and Max Harrington 1 v1. S3, -"w IL �F+1, • 1 •y �i 1 a}t '7 S 1 . ` All M1 w.� 2 i.� w•r _ . i • �1 , r � �4� � 1 a , .^I 1 TODD PARK RINK 165'x 85' � 1 r N W +AB { I S f91N�1�b O`er Y TODD PARK RINK 165'x 85' � 1 r N W +AB { I S • � MONDAY • 13 TUESDAY:, ��{ WEDNESDAY'., . THURSDAY FRmAY_ SATURDAY SUNDAY ,.� � . �` -.�� •. Ll %,a(MANDALE 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm pm 6pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7ptr/q 7pm rpl2 -jp 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 9 3472 8pm PAMELA 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 71)m 7pm 8pm SPM 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm STRACHAUER 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm T uD 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm WALNUT RIDGE 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 80m 8pm WEBER l -3 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm p � 1 l in 5 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY .� a.3 all ARDEN 6pm 8 f S Av.4 C. 6pm -brIS -010 6pm\ 6pm �AjS 6pmPf/ f„u,(� 6pm 6pm •� -rum-j-" 4�','e'ls 7pm Pm � a—ls 7pm 7pm pm Pm BRv,n h��� W'lo B pm - op 8p s- C 8pm 8pm 8pm CORNELIA Val 6pm Sk 6pm 0. Bacot - 6pm 6pm - e"V 6pm 6pm 6pm c �t G I� e✓ p 7pm 7pm eC1{ S Z 7pm 7pm 7pm s F�� a..,,. G 8pm pm 8pm 8pm 8pm COUNTRYSIDE bav,IS 6pm U 1 0 L3 ar . 6pm 6pm 6pm G -b 6pm 6pm 6pm pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm pjuy6 -� 7 pm 61 BPmPw Ba,N. 8pm 8pm 8pm pm P U .I 0 B �L. CREEK VALLEY t 6pm 6pm -&Is Z 1N 0 6pm 1S 6pm &f-S �2 R 6pm 6pm 6pm W 'i Nt. UJ11 7pm rYl 7pm 7pm 7pm sc� g °b° pm - c 4-r-- z'1= 7pm c4 S� w;L aw pi-4 pm _ pm- ?o 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm HIGHLANDS v c�_�11Lqfrh\ , 1, r T 6pm A' A V C'h "ed i fij) 6pm • 0; & _ 6pm\ 6pm • E" aS' y si'l`l •! 6pm 6pm 6pm 7pm „ 7pm - "4s 7- vas 7pm jjj �g ra j 7pm 7pm 7pm pm 8pm6C,4 8 m - - f� -3 8pm 8pm 8pm 3 LEWIS p- Q � Hot" 6pm 6pm 6pm y•►n? 6pm- ,, 3rve 9 6pm 6pm 6pm 7pm 7pm I � 7pm 7pm hha 7pm pm r� �,; -s 3'`"� 7pm 04" r� • � 3-'W 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm spm I0. - y "h,,,,,,. cf o� MONDAY TUESDAY WEDKESDAY, THURSDAY FRIDAY "_' SATURDAY. SUNDAY MiltMANDALE 471 �- 6 S 3� �j m. 6P � 6 m P 1 6pm r$ a � 6pm 6pm pm E 3 ,. 7pm 7p h0. ! t 7pm is 7pm 7pm 7pm pm 8pm 8 J pm 8pm 8pm 8pm PAMELA 6pm 6pm� �1 'Pm OlJ li 6 S -�P� 7v�rt� 6pm 6pm Pm �fyS Pm' 7pm (,2rh/ � 7pm - 7pm 7pm AVA"i4i- � t 8pm 8 pm 8pm 8pm 8pm apm STRACHAUER / 6pm 6pm 6pm 8 V • 6 i 6pm 6pm 6pm 7pm P S CS, 7pm -�r't Q bQ • 7pm 7pm 7pm pm 8pm pm pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm TODD N� 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 7pm X6pm 7pm X7pmn X6pm 7pm 7pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm WALNUT RIDGE 1�N 6pm A 6pm qy, J3 6pm V 6pm 6pm �� 6pm 6pm 7pm 6NS 3 Q4DWis 7pm 7Pm Pang -QUw 2 7pm 7pm 7pm _ Pm y S{�&4 FS " 8 �m'A� `�`^'� uI08 W. 8pm 8pm pm gcAq i /31&kty �1kj 8pm 8pm gpm WEBER ✓ 6pmC'r 6pm �4S 6pm Gpm 6pm 6pm 6pm stivda (v i 7pm 7pm pU16 w. 1 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm LSAJO 8pmp c- cr. 0 'EV rA 8pm 8pm 8pm K �►n[�� _ 8pni PLO pm MONDAY .23 TUESDAY J%,r WEDNESDAY • s) THURSDAY 30 FRIDAY 3 SATURDAY 1 SUNDAY ARDEN / v 6pm "��� pm �[" � ury t.-5 6pmvB +� 7pm �+ W, 1 4) 6pm 7pm y `/ 6pm �r� 7pm � ICU ► O 6pm ���'cu.�C 6pm 7pm 6pm 7pm pm B 2 8pm 8pm p S , B 8pm 8pm 8pm CORNELIA V 6pm ,e '! pm s 2 A P e ' ± 6pm FJ 6 9 p . 7pm / y 6pm 7pm 6pm rwo p 61z►l' 7pm -rl L C �i41� 1 6pm 7pm 6pm 7pm to IOlt 6pm 7pm 8pm 8pm , - -PwC 8pm 9 P- m 8pm 8pm 8pm COUNTRYSIDE J 6pm pm &N 6pm pc 6pm 7pm O W 6k w . ✓ 6pm 7pm 6pm 7pm 6pm 7pm 11.euPSt±Y�:r�y 6pm St74�Z> Pm �- I �! S 8pm pm 8pm 8pm 8pm / 8pm PW C 8pm CREEK VALLEY / / I�/ 6pm Ptty,, FvIN 3^u,. 6pm- W ,� 6pm 7pm 8pm 6pm > "! }u pm L if PB m Ulan w. 6pm I� , 7PTM ' 1 8pm ✓ �/ 6pm 7pm 8pm 6pm 7pm 8pm 7pm �u'1 ^I 2flra 8pm i a B w HIGHLANDS 6pm 1;/ BLS 04,4, `JI'AM 6pm C,z� 5AOA4 � ✓ sV 6pm u \ I w ✓ 6pmC!� SG7 .IL.S �;an 6P m 6 m rrrl� P 4ch 6pa-0-dflop Pm pm -y +c S .avn 7 m l" v J) 7pm �) ^ l f(y/j 8P J 7pm � �T 7pm 8pm 7pm 8pm 7pm 8pm Q Pm 6 �a �'' Pm C (� Stff�S 8Pm (lr C C�cL.F,�i,4lr LEWIS � � Vol 6pm 7pmOW 13 (q1, 00 8pm 6pm 6pm pm 8pm 6pm 61n 15 Pj /v [ 5 6pm 7pm 8pm 6pm 7pm 8pm 6pm 7pm 8pm 7pm G� x' n pm ? gm, 8pm 8pm 3o MONDAY TUESDAY. 'WEDNESDAY THURSDAY "' " FRIDAY . SA AY SUNDAY NuRMANDALE 6p� 5 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 7pm ! /- iT 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm S !J r✓S� 8pm 7pm (\ 8pm 7pm ,,�r 8pm/ rr��� pV gpm 8pm 8pm PAMELA 6pm Vd&W,6+ 6pm rl� il�.� 6pm p It 6pm � 6 pm 6pm j p��'' /�f/�4 %Gu RV *l gwGk Q rp 7PL�w *d! e� M✓ 7pm U 7pm 7pm Pm S gp T% i , c� C °�^ ' gPm •r p Sep- Coa., 8pm ... ' . 8pm 8pm STRACHAUER 6pm 6pm 6pm 67 �' 6pm 6pm 6pm 7pm Ste bl • -7pm 7pm .�t, r 7pm 7 Pm 7 pm 7pm L S p"' 9 8 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm TODD 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6N �i (� 7pm X8pm 7pm X7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 8pm 8pm 8 pm 8 pm gpm WALNUT RIDGE ✓ 6pm 6pm 6pm do 6pm 6pm 6pm 7pm y 7pm ii 7pm 7pm h C 7pm 7pm 7pm pm 0iogw, 8pm gpm pm -�-,�_ �8pm _It 8pm 8pm 8pm WEBER J 6pm F 6 �iG►'L�fD►� 6gm 6pm 6pm 6pm ( 7PmJi� 8 o{� 7pm 7pm 7pm pm pm Qm F� r ✓S P ;+ r U►) G c1f1. U 8pm 8pm - 8pm 8pm �.�(O��a �•dpp• � MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY s AREItN 1/ Ole, 6pm Auc� -la- 6pm be j-� wit 6pm ;,�u,J 6pm v K „ 6pm � ,r� 6pm 6pm 7pm -7r1, S ' 1nI pm 6ruI � 7pm S w'. uD 7pm 'fi!!CK pm57, 7pm y 7pm pms� B 8pm Pw Baw, 8pm 8pm S� B O 8pm �+ 8pm �A $go.- i. 8pm CORNELIA V10000, ✓ ✓ �p•3�� 6pm 6pm 6 a It 6pm 5� Q w' 6pm 6pm v 6pm 6pm 7pm - 7pm - 7pm S O 8 w . 7pm ` 7pm 7pm 7pm o� . p Yom/ ��l 8pm 8pm PW C, � 8pm 8pm 8pm KIM COUNTRYSIDE / V 6pm50� C bt • 6pmS.I C 61 6pm � 6pm 6pm 6pm 7pm 7pm � r 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm Bv�cr ►' 1 pm c ,4A_l " pm ' 8pm 8pm 8pm 8 8pm 8pm 8pm C CREEK VALLEY / ✓ f✓ 1�2 6pm V m , 6prcpl� w1ho 6pm 6 �PwFS 6pm 6 PmDU 6pm pm rs 7pm C,,,,, 3 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 8pm u I pm � � 8pm pm� r a 8pm 8pm 8pm HIGHLANDS / UAJO :30 6pm cw"diY 6pm Sh Jc5 6pm \4+r'p�� 6pm S�wlc.5 6pm A 6pm 6pm 7pm c� 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 8pm / 8pm 8pm 8pm pm Q pm m LEWIS / ✓ 6pm V 1 O 4 c • 6pm 5q b w , 6pm 6p 6pm 6pm 6pm 7pm 7pm ' 7pm p� ni 7pm 7pm 7pm 8pm 8pm I y a 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm ,t v lot3 cr. MONDAY TUESDAY, WEDNESDAY: THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY: SUNAAV 6 ALE 6p 6pm . s 6pm y 6pm Pls 6pm 6pm J 6pm pJa P r: a 7Pm * 7pm 7pm 7pm �i pm '" Pw c {,�, 8pm pW c bc. 8pm 8pm 8pm PAMELA vool, v ✓ _ 6pm rp 6�\��// 6Pm f}M .e S � 6Pm VA � .L � ' Q 'Pm/ �D!�1 pm 7pm 8p S0 i o P .�. n G 8pm 8pm 8pm STRACHAUER ✓ 6/ ✓ Ir 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm &-4-s / 6pm 6 mn i C!- n DS p L od .Coda 7pm 7pm )pm 7pm 'pm 'pm Ipm S ht�C gp $ 8pm gpm gpm 8pm 8pm apm TODD Pool �D ,may. 6pm 7pm 6 7pm 6pm 7pm X7pm 6pm 7pm 6pm 7pm , 6pm 7 pm Spm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm RIDGE ✓ vool ��7�}eKq Rac�/c'u,A1dAlG�d�S 6pm So A 6pm � 6P �c�✓1`1'�!!S 6pm 6p - m w' 7pm �tN1.uo pm 3hae r- 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm = pm 8pm 8pm w , S 8pm 80m 8pm WEBER t✓ t✓ ,� � -a �°'�, �" ;� q is -�, �o 6pm F-1 Vl S 6p S 6Pm L7 � B� 6pm5Ot- 6 , 6pJ/W G�'✓' . 6pm 6pm 7pm Sa ,,g 0- 7pm p (,11 B l W 7pm 7pm Pm e 7pm P Cs� 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm Pm 1 i ir1i: BPr� YWBao�►. Pm PLO Oa-C�„ GQ, -atio T, 15' c.Qe MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY ARDE �ur o 6pm 6pm w 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 7pm 7pm 7pm pm pm P W w, 7pm 7pm �' Pm B p 15 6'r, 8 pW B/ 8P BPm C �, t. 8pm 8pm CORNELIA �j 6pms� S 6pm 1 on it 6pm � p W , 6p ?,oPr,e.rs 6pm 6pm 6pm_U" 7pm e S m �t�ckG,�.lcs 7pm _ 7pm �ark5 7pm 7pm 7pm 8pm W G 0 p} C w, 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 5pmpw G oyp• COUNTRYSIDE L� (/ UOS) trM AS 6pm, 6pmS C- 6t 6pm U19 8 , 6pm 6pm V 106 °r , 6pm 6pm kAAJ 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm -�{ / C, 8pm Pw 8pm �w 8pm pm�C b. 8pm 8pm 8pm CREEK VALLEY v ✓ \�`Z 2 6pm (�� �1� 6pm ', g� wj 6pm 6pm J-e 144E 6pm 6pm pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm pm pm ' 4� 8pm 5-- G cto 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm apm C HIGHLANDS Q m 6pm 6pm ` 6pm 6pm S C Sri - � Il +•� 6pm -' 6pm 7pm pm 7pm pm 7pm 8pm 7PTTL 8pm 7pm 8pm 7pm 8pm 7pm 8pm LEWIS / V .� ✓ 6pm 6pm S of A 6pm 6pm„ . 6pm 6pm 6pm v e �r 7pm V `i B pm -7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm pm ll i +1 S uy 8p 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm opyn 8a �,, . MONDAY.. TUESDAY THURSDAY SAY SATURDAY SUNDAY:' o << ts•: t3. 1 �s 1i• NO DALE 6 6pm 6h n 6pm � mto) 6 S 6p PW ��/. 6pm 6pm 7p 8p Pm 7p 8pm 7p 8pm 7p 8pm p� �V 7p 8pm . Pm C- W d F PAMELA �f ✓ 6p 6pm 6p e�l f 6pm 6pm 6pm ��"` 7pm Pd6�6R l� mes Pm Att�loti+cl 7 7p 7pm Pm J oY ° pnt4C' 8p 8p 8pm �W C p STRACHAUER 6p 6p 6pm 6 gl�� 6pm 6pm 6p �.li'Ct/J(t3 7pm 71m p G 7p 7pm 7pm mS 8p p 8p 8p %' .. a 8pm 8p 8pm 1 TODD / V 6pm 6p 6p 6p 6pm 7pm X6pm 7pm 7pm X8pm 7pm 7pm 8pm 8pm 8 8p 8p WALNUT RIDGE 0 5Ik A ym- �v(L 6pm 6p 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 7pm IV . "4s 7pm p a� 7pm p Sly 7pm 7p 7pm 8pm, 8pm 8pm 8p pm C�-, of 0 apm 8 /"k f 6JS WEBER 6p C-2 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm ppm Mp 7pm pm 7pm 7pm 7pm I/ "P p" 8a 8pm P� C 8pm 8pm 8pm i 1, MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY ARIRN C 6? 4W�..J 6pm A h n L p '' 6 W i I Q 6p \ /I j} 1 6pm r' l�tr� iaulf�S 6pm ! 6p 7 7'w', 10 7pm ID pm 7p f� 7pm 7pm p'8—m 8p! 8p7 ✓ 8p S� B 8pm 8pm 8pm CORNELIA BZ `�a, _r � " 6pm k 6pm � , 6pm 6p h P.f`S 6pm 6pm 6pf 7pm 7 n,, ��jj�w 7p 7pms CGS 7pm 7pm 7p A 8pm 17 GUI f 8pm 8pm 8pm � pm pW C COUNTRYSIDE M0 D1l.Ui (S � BfrJ, Hg 6pm.... s 6p 81A k }�,' p C �y(, 6p 6pm 6pm 6pm 7pm Sa. C W, 7pm 7pm 7p '7pm ` l q 8p vw e w, 8pm * 8 8pm S', g °� 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm CREEK VALLEY 6p �t, 6pm 6p U is 6 W . 6pm 6pm 6p 6pm pm 1pm c 7pm 77 AO W,;,i 7pm 7pm 7p 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm spme 8pm5,,, C Cf HIGHLANDS �I ( ✓ ✓ G� -� y Yvl a,'-) ` 3c„ pt I }oc6� quo -ySroo 6pm k S 6pm \q rnu 6pm c k5 6pm 6pm 6p 7pm (4o('�(�IA 7pm 7p 7pm 7 lvr�cr! m C.IGf��G.iL � p 8pm C' -d�< <� LS PM °d'' pm Stzfi� -S 8p/ J 8pm 8pm 8pm LEWIS 6pm 6pm V 1 O B -n . 6pm 6 1, J 6pm 6pm 6pm 7pm 7pm ; ee pm' V 7pm 7pm 7pm pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm c 8pm 8pm 8pm MONDAY: TUESDAY, WEDNESD AY THURSDAY. ,FRIDAY. SATURDAY' SUNDAY s (f V 6pm N 6pm �M 6pm 6pm 6pm" 6pm p m- P�B a 7pm r 1 7pm 8pr�/ 7pm "8}i17 %() 7pm 8pm 7pm 8pm 7pm 8pm �wGb�. / pwc be. PAMELA q 11-2 6pm J JIU,JO 6pm 6pm an,� f- �/�/y 6pm Vlo 6pm 6pm 7pm "' e" 7 Pm 7pm P Vo� 7 R 8 pm r ., C Sc� � , pm 8pm 8pm Pm fJA�. �a.vwB '. cO �C - d STRACHAUER 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm �prt� i P9t0 6pm 6pm 6pm 7pm 7pm Pm S c� G b�. 7pm 7pm 7pm 8pm 8pm 8pm U 108 cel , 8pm 8pm 8pm GPM T OD no 6pm 6 6pm 6 6pm 6pm 6pm �, °I 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 8pm 8p 8pm 8p 8p 8pm 8pm WALNUT RIDGE ✓ i ' V i.o0 �!�w . � I�'c)- 05 ",so yy1i. r-7 'v� nl# iS 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm P 6pm 6pm S� pm i p —�W- W I 7pm PW�4� 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm pm 8pm 80m 8pm Opm hu10Bw. p n 0t upm WEBER � ✓ 6,,30-8�o glL�_,M�l� 6pm � 6pm 6pm {� 6�m 6pm r S r,��eyr- C" ) � 6pm 6pm 7Pm pm 7pm 7pm 7pm pm pm r 8Pm NJ ®a 8pm 8pm 8pm Opul Pm P MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY' SATURDAY SUNDAY. s� �a s� ARqN 9 mao) 6 m G 7P 6pm U), 1D 6p NMQ� / 7pm 6pm ,�� n 6pm ►g d�,�(c 6pm 101 6pm 7pm I 8pm r1 'Ili 8pm/ Pm U1r11D 8pm 7pm 8pm 7pm So °�` ' C, G W • 5 0 8pm CORNELIA V V 6pm Sh �2�L5 6pm b t'Z 6pmgpw.}ov,,,,. C 6p j, e.r.5 6pm 6pm J 6p� pm 7 m pm 7 7pm 7pm 7pm W G Pm 5� C 6-f 8pm 4511 l 8pm 8pm 8pm COUNTRYSIDE 3 j•�/l'dl.elY� p� 1LV113 ,�� w.5 6pmg 6pm U I O$ can, 6pmA/w. w. 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 7p C kuuA 7pm ��I e/r 7pC �A �s 7pmlifOBoY�. 0 7pm 7pm 7pm 8pm pw G 8pm So} 8pm 0 �''1 °�° 8 m � W 8pm 8pm 8pm CREEK VALLEY 30 -3 %00 6pm t��% r:E� 6pm Wi�� 6pm 6pm %e llc 0. �5 6pm 6pm 6pm ffl° "" "� pm v 7pm 7pm 7pm pm 0 oL 7pm R J r 8pm pm 8pmQ_ cop �t 8pm 8pm 8pm p!i Oa0 HIGHLANDS - r 6pm � 6pm s k 6pm y ma«� 6pm /� 6pm 5 Tr � 6pm 6pm JAL' 7pC d{Mr� m ss 7pm y„ uJ"'1 7pm 7pm 7pm 8pm g Z 8pm t'S 8pm 8pm 8pm pm LEWIS ✓ y 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pr f LYes 6pm 6pm 6pm 7pm pm // 7pm U I `� B 7pm 7pm 7pm 7Pyp 8pm pm 6 8pm 8pm SOir B y 8pm 8pm 8pm 1,30 lo;w- Ue�� MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY' THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY, •'- . y,3v z 6p 6pm 6pm 6pm l 6pm 6pm 6pm 7M pm i I 7pm a. va W 7pm 7pm PM I e 7pm I� W ®02 0 0 8p f �v C- 6� . 8p W spm 8pm spm PAMELA / /� 6pm 6p 7p r d.. 6pm 7pm �� 6pm pm VA O-L pm C 6pm �c. v 7pm rd Jam' 6pmq.M4`r 7pm N flG 8� 87,! C Sp 5PTry 4. G b.2 8pm � 8prty 1 STRACHAUER 6pm 6pm 50� 6 6pm &)161 6pm 2 -y JVC 6pm rI l z 6pm 7pm m 7pm 7pm S B (,,I, 7pmSQ 6 OR 7pm 7pm 8pm l opm 8pm 8pn),,._ ,.Q 8pm 8pm pm T DD 6pm C��tv �- 6 m 6pm 6 6pm 6pm n / Jo 7pm U 101 m /7 1% T 7pm 8pm X7pm 7pm 8pm 7pm 8pm 7pm 8pm rr,JJJJ ` �z _cJ` q'3 gjo WALNUT c 0' 6pm 6pm* �►a a 6pm 6pm 6pmU�OW. m IM "A 7 7pm �h a+e-kS 7pm 7pm 7pm 8pm g 60 w. 8pm 80m 8pm pm 8pmu 1 a B w, WEBER - / V I a ✓,.�.- 6pm W 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm �� pm pm o ��r, p p 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm F 4 MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY' SATURDAY SUNDAY. N 6 Uu Q Q 6pm W i I () 6pm \ymQ f� 6p l l� 6pm &w)(.s 6pm 1 JL c 6pm 7p7 J 7pm 1 0 7pm L- 7pm , 7pm 7pm % 7pm Sp • . 8 8pm i 8P�V pm 8pm 8pm 8pm CORNELIA ✓ OhM �^� I0- 11,,��Ll�ac�t 6pm % aR �S 6pm 6 8.� 6pm 6p %2�s 6pm 6pm 6pm, bo 7pm +,,A e j 7r W 7pm P S 7pm 7pm 7pm pm G 8pm 8p m 8pm 8pm 8pm COUNTRYSIDE r if � { \� 6pm U 10 13 or. 6pm PW G w • 6pm 6pm � r � 6pm J 6..p � m St/4�S p - A, _ (1 pFa �}-L-. 7pm `p- -�-�f1 7pm 7pm 7pm 8pm P w C or, 8PT ; J' . w , 8pm gyP_ m 8pm 8pm 8pm Or C CREEK VALLEY ✓ 6pm 6pm I I 6pm 6pm Loot 6pm 6pm 6pm Pm �:q Pm I t 7Pm P 7pm 7pm 7pm -cWIV 8pm /tv. ,, 8P's� C 00 8pm Pm C 8pm 8pm 8pm 04 HIGHLANDS • ' � i 9 a - s��b.o��. 6pj 6 6pm 6pm cE' // pm h 1C 6pm 6pm p �n 7pm pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pc�a its Esc (t..5 d Erg 8pm a 8pm 8pm J 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm LEWIS 6pm 6pm 5 C / r 6pm 6p d i J { ' 6pm 6pm 6pm 7Pm pm pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 8pm 8pm 8pm pm 8pm 8pm 8pm VlO or, F • p MONDA Y TUESDAY WEDNESDAY,: THURSDAY� FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY � ' � . v ALE ✓ 6p 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm PUU G W. 6pm 6pm -rp-mu Pm 7pm FI P 7pm 8pm /A4 pm w Pm 7pm 8pm 7pm � 7pm 8Pm pw G � . 5'4 ®pop PAMELA / ��i 6 � � 6pm � - . G _ asa�tiu0 6p 6 pm 6pm 6pm 7pm �l�e 7pm y 7pm PM aua.,ti pm cjw 'cua pm � P 5, - C P $ . C w. 8 8pm 8pm STRACHAUER 6pm 6pm<016 6pm �. 61m 4m 6pm 7pm q, T 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 8pm pm 8pm 8pm 8Pm 8pm 8Pm TODD / v 1 J I 6pm 6pm 6 6pm 6pm 7pm X7pm 7pm X7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 1� 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm WALNUT RIDGE ✓ 10-3,30 � � Sr/�0�1►� �wfk 6pm a w 6pm ` 6pm 6pm Pani� 6pm fi 6pm gel � o6pT � s��� }� }butuazi ;:4 7 pm ww s,o , 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm xpm 1p 8pm 8pm 80m 8pm �UIQ5w, 8pm �iaaw. pm WEBER ✓ ql - ZI ` jr�t 6pm 6p�� 6pm 6o�fi 6pmPW�G oe, 6pm 6pm 7pm � B ( • 8pm8 P� r COA1�!�lfi L�C!'1 7pm 8pm 7pm 8pm 7pm PM Ca.,�N�' 7pm 11 �I W4GU pm pm '-�, . n rl 8pm MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY 7A:Y�ljb '4 / /Y ARDEN 6pm 6pm 6p)n, 6p r,, 6pm 6pm 6pm pm 7p7pm 7pm �9- C � C 7pm 7 m pm 5G g or , 8pm8P 8pm W g� 8pm 8pm CORNELIA C� jlo� 6pS5 6pni.8 &2,5,,: 6pm 6p 6pm 6pm 6pm pm V7 LtLy� Pc om Cr 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 8pm Spm 8pm 8pm P —� C C�o 8pm 8pm 8pm C COUNTRYSIDE e'er 2t. p 6pm 6pm V 1 O B V , 6pm 6p a 6pm 6pm 6pm S gm 7pm lgck kwjli MONDAY _ TUESDAY WEDNESDAY.' .THURSDAY FRIDAY;: SATURDAY: SUNDAY [NORMANDALE ✓ 6p 6pm ' I� s 6pm �7muAV • 6pm 6pm AAA 6pm 6pm 7 Pm 7pm 7pm 7pm Pm 7 Pm�� 7pm 8pm/ Ilpm pw C w . 8pm Spa' 8pm pm appw C PAMELA ✓ V � �{� .. p kjA Q I /'VDU / t 6 ;6 Y �W wy�� .t- 6pm f Ind � 6pm 6pm � 6pm � "b� UApm � 7pm 7pm 7pm Ipm (RID �G ^^y 8 pm 8pm 8pm p opm . ! STRACHAUER �� ,�yq, 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm /"ntS 6pm 6pm 6pm 7pm m 7pm p� 7pm 7pm 7pm 8pm 5 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm TODD p Q 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 7pm X7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8p 8pm 8pm WALNUT GPiA sGeC� RIDGE 6pm B 3 w ' 6pm 6pm 6pm � A)r7-(m 6pm 6pm 6pm �e �itf {L pm p 7 ux�U 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm ' -- LL !! 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm pm oril.u10 pm pm WEBER (4"A° 6pm,/ � �` 6p S �r!r 7- 6pmPW G o,/1 • U I--Ipm 6pm Cannn�' 6pm PU)C �'l • 6pm 6pm •�yA�;j�,.. f1 I .S pm 7pm ' pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 8pm �W8o2o� 8pm pm 8pm 8pm C - MONDAY 1y TUESDAY It WEDNESDAY /: THURSDAY FRIDAY' SATURDAY SUNDAY -F&4 AR EN 6pm 6pm 6pm 6P 6pm LIJ r 1 \" ' A S 6pm pm -) W,1 7pm 7pm 7pm pm 7pm (ld 51 7pm pm 8pm 8pm CORNELIA 6pe�,h-,,,, 6pm 'B B li 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm m �` C 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm pm ti p (nJ G 8p S" ct G pm v (o g 8pm 8pm 8pm COUNTRYSIDE U-"�av /K 6pm �q g °d'- ' 6pm U I O Q ep , 6pm D.�w•t5 ���y, 6pm ' 1'' 6pm 6pm 6pm & ; pm i &t-4-L- ,, 7pm 7pm P, ►� 7pm 7pm 7pm pm pw C of pm 8pm p� m • 8pm 8pm 8pm CREEK VALLEY N�iPS 6pm ej,,o 6pm 6pm 6pm E 6pm 6pm 6pm Pm PW 8 41.J . 7pm O'C4.S 1p ��/}��f �^ • 7pm 7pm 7pm pm Spm< bar 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm ap W HIGHLANDS C4 -1 6pm �R 6pm 6pm 1 pA o) 6pm Sh-40 ✓/ 6pm 6pm J 6pm 7pm pm vC.. 7pm $b i-,,i pm 7pm 7pm 7pm pm)3 B a pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm LEWIS 6pm r,q H 6pm B B A w 6pm, 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm l V '7 m j'� V.� pm , tf •�� 7pm 7pm /� •1 �, i ` 7pm 7pm 7pm .I `'_ - 8pm 'S pm 8pm Spm 8pm ._ - MONDAY -- TUESDAY. WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY' • • SATURDAY SUNDAY- , �b - `• IY •� ' �S - - :.. /� � /�` �8 _ : (i1tMANDALE � / 6p 6pm ��/t 6pm ✓ 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm PM pm F7 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm pm , I n pm 8pm 8 ' % pm 8pm 8pm 8pm PAMELA n , 6�dXiW- � 6pm �oYNt '7pm 6Pe► 6pm PPM m �m 71"M 7pm @ �1 V 7pm 7pm 8 8pm 8pm p 5 [ C G pm STRACHAUER JI-= 6pm 6pm b M, 6pm 67 ?d 6pm 6pm 6pm 7pm pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm � 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm TODD ^ p ` 1 ) 6pm � � � �7pm 7pm 7pm X 7pm 7pm 7pm 8pm 8p 8pm 8p 8pm 8pm WALNUT O" , I RIDGE CL G�-Q 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 7pmS;-C &"�' pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 1pm P'.� L1 GI% 1 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm SCt A 3pm WEBER 16pm 6pm 6pm 6pm ' 6pm 6pm 6pm 7pm-V 8 ,� , 7pm 7pm 7pm -7pm pm �; ,,, IOU, B� 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm m . Fw g� 0 , �� MONDAY �1 TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY' SATURDAY SUNDAY • � � � 6 ARDEN / 6pm 6pm 4. 6pm A '. , 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 7pm 7pm 7pm, �i,, 7 . 7pm 7pm 7pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm CORNELIA / NA 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 7pm pm �a M v ) 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 8pm —' 8 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm COUNTRYSIDE 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm ` CREEK VALLEY 6pm 6pm V 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 7pm �77pm�3rd Cio 7pm pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 8pm 8pW_ m 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm HIGHLANDS 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm JJ 6pm 7pm 7pm 7pm )%�/, 7pmo`^y 7pm 7pm 7pm 8pm 8pm 8pm J 8prl�arQiy 8pm 8pm 8pm LEWIS V / ✓ ✓ 6/ 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm ^,J,, AP— 6pm 6pm 6pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm - �a 7pm 7pm 7pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm - 8pm 8pm 8pm A MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY.: THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY` NOIiMANDALE 6pm 1'� 6pm ►W eo 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 7pm pm 7pm pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm PAMELA 6pm 6pm 6pm /&17' 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm �� 7pm 7pm 7pm pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 8pm 8pm 8 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm STRACHAUER 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm TODD 6pm 6p 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm X7pm 7pm 7pm 8pm 8p 8pm 8p 8pm 8pm WALNUT RIDGE 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm WEBER 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 8pm 8pm Spm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm t Aqk Mt MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRED" SATURDAY SUNDAY ARDEN 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm ; ` 6pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8p 8pm CORNELIA 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 7pm 7 7pm 7pm 7pM 7pm 7pm 8pm 8pm �� 8pm 8pm f "8pm 8pm 8pm COUNTRYSIDE 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm �' 6pm 6pm 6pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7ppq 7pm 7pm 7pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm j CREEK j VALLEY / 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 7pm 7pm 7pm' 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8 8pm 8pm HIGHLANDS i 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 7pm 7pny 7pm 7pm 7pm Ipm 7pm 8pmm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8p`m\ 8pm \ LEWIS `t 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm 7pm pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm Edina Hockey Association Historical Player Count August,15, 2005 Termites Mites 3rd Year Boys 2nd Year Boys 1st Year Boys Upper Level Girls Lower Level Girls Squirts PeeWee Bantams Jr Gold U10 U12 U14 U19 Total Actual Acutal Actual Actual Projected 2001/2002 2002/2003 2003/2004 200412005 2005/2006 0 0 0 65 90 250 82 88 112 115 84 98 88 115 89 1,02 90 100 48 65 65 41 60 60 147 155 163 160 1,75 131 147 153 147 145 88 92 113 104 134 52 83 :84 45 75 29 44 64 69 73 42 44 57 53 .64 42 37 38 35 41 0 14 10 15 29 781 871 1059 1108 1281 el-ry ecerse Maintaining Edina's Vision Current Proposed for Preserving Green Spaces *Maintaining Edina's Vision for Preserving Green Spaces Edina 20/20 vision •A balance of Land Uses • Outstanding neighborhoods and an extensive network of parks and open spaces *Objective #1 - Obtain Strong residential neighborhoods *This neighborhood supports Edina sports and the Edina Hockey Association — we are working for the best use of park space *Maintaining Edina "s Vision for Preserving Green Spaces RI Green Space as a priority Edina's 20120 Vision - A Strategic Plan What Does this Place Want to Be? Charactedsticsof the Future Community = _ A Community that has: a �E Safe and convenient ti ansportation system • %% • • Small town feel i •••� • O OQ OJI0 ago Positive community involvement o • Strong business environment 0 coo 0 ■ ■ c, Excellent education system © o State of the art integrated technology a 0 © og o 0 O 000a taulti- generational diverse community 0 o Op o a 0� � � • r �oQ • !:green. parks and open space a 000 0 8 Strong lifecycle housing stock ©� ao ©• (".duality public infrastru cture • CO ® % M • 0 ; Nlufti -use community center �• •• 0 O 0 • • a % a o Childcare a o • Maintaining Edina's Vision for Preserving Green Spaces 3 306 Signatures Boa rids and Commissions City of Edina Citizens City Council City RI anager City Attorney The undersigned neighbors of T. Lea Todd Park place a high value on the minimal amount of green space remaining in the Park. We strongly object to any development of the Park that would encroach on or eliminate any of the Park's existing green space, including the Edina Park Board's proposal to construct a hockey rink in the Park. Maintaining Edina -s Vision for Preserving Green Spaces 4 zBenefit of a long •Clearly define parks and open spaces •Lewis and Countryside Parks - Master Plan *We Cannot Grow More Parks - Preserve parks and trees *Park Board decisions would reflect city priorities Maintaining Edina -s Vision for Preserving Green Spaces Table 3.14 Comparison of Indoor and Outdoor Athletic Facilities (Public Facilities) Per 1.000 Population (2000 Population Estimatesl Life Time Fitnes.s(Publiel"rivaie) •• Life Time Fitness & School District (Public Private) Source: City of Eden Prairie Para and Recreation Department, 2002 Eden Prairie Park and Open Space System Plan SR t )nsulting Group, Inc 3 -27 L Fncilitiesl 61 L • "" c -- e Comments population :•• 3 0 'c -r e r_ _ In v g v c 16 r-r tllllll'.I im (Net's %MIIItt•i1,6 44 I S I'Vol All %ur :gvca collllllun lk:-4 slLflh :lll'hsictUll 1,1.1t>D I :.I('ll I :'.S") I11)[l I olio 1 1,200 ckt cd[tatrun+llslatUard-, Ilbhlydlleldsanulil•utc G II P. 5 >Z 4 N'A '.nfltulll.'hlt,elpll f,'V „611 1d.,ltrttJ 1.1(1•(JlU i I ]4,311u I'',!r.MJ I: V,uxi ]5 AKI' 111wttall field, V 7 9 S 1 `1.1,01 1'den Prull le Nnllttl ILL`et1 tt4{I unllHhtrlt 1 t.,I1NJ I ;;,tYJ)U I n,LKtU ' I h, +ixt I I:,tNNI f'�,�M) a,lditiutwl Bold•+ 1„ get 1;+ T I 1'I4,rNNl 75'.'>(1' 11osr1+.11l feh1, 1 f Ii1JnrJ 1 5S, K"i 1 "13AO) 1 1 -MICl 1 42.L+pJ 1,"N- AASJ f :4,000 i. tmi s acct rield5 I-den Prone iS 1 ;1,1101 h[ ,naxr.'hxuhnll fields k+ d I4 14 1- 1 • IU.t}tttl I:I,StNJ Unll,00 I.l,Hlp 111tXJ 1.7,Y?a I-o.SM I'I}nwuth 12 172,000 L•I,NtXI Inllghtcdicgulawm 13 tv I(, 1 'la, l0 ht t, ccl�11>tirlrall 141111 1, 7, N.4) 1- t.<Utl 1.a 000 i 1 1,8W 1 1,tt+.1 1 w,G00 Apple Ysllcy 61 1t'700 flwm 111c a7 1 '1[IU 1 1AIlled rcgi lutual a 1) t 1 4 4 1 :O,tNXJ sllacel!(,ktholl lletds 1 +lI,fi[NJ 1 4.[W J 161,U60 I I411ts) 1.120011 1 1 2WQ I'dnu 17 U „tfJtl Sold "111e)h'ill roan• 1: a 4 Zia 14 1 5.00 there ill no Incrcv.ud deuund 1,4,!1011 1.7,Iol 1 Ib, 71. M* I :.0 I J,11011 I• ?i,00u I '.oisu _ 11,ritlttrteuultl Ilx...uye of the furiii«cs Ouldr1r111xtiCe4 -nos.• 13 11 13 1. - -- 16 11 ”' -- 1 I,ViNJ 1 AL1tKB --- 1 S,1YK1 1 1 ).3410 I'1,'Sl7 1 a,C7fh1 cu+uiulu8tirJtcrrasc. hduurhtxke4'nnls 2 ' . = 3 hl3ulin the Ihriry As"tullon Ito., 1127.500) V: 1;3_,tl{:r0 ' 1•2 i,4!>'J I ;I0,O)o 1 io,[15A1 tnlcl petltlo"d for it third rink 1 • _ - -_ Itnw l )uId1A,f - -- 11 1 0 1 V'000 mien' 441C Mod-w Bull [it It53,M)LI 1 0.60') 1.47'" 12140) 13, 60 Kiij 1117,UrAl Flaphlp .Atldwtic i'lutl, S "rlt'th%ol Athletic Club & the NeserNe. hldtan piKtls z )" 3• • ` Y 4 I N.,A 11,cre air Ulu) 1114cor l"i1) Ill 1 - 2".Mio 1,13,1J11(l I:I.LW I I4,IJIU 1, 15,(AAI 1 Iit'j 1) I111phip Atldet/C (91.1h atilt Nurthac,l Athlete C ittb Tennis courts 52 :b 44 5I )h 1:,110x1_ Eden Pratric has I$ pntate 1 .1011 1 1!t.tlkl 1 I I.-51 I'_?W JI I 110 1 1 w tennis Wurts avoiluble thrmSh Nunhucyt Athlcut; Club, Flagship :Athletic Club i and the Presme. tridow basketball e,'uu 19 ;a 1= 's I to It, 1•S,IXN) Slit addlttunal courts IJ3,1W 1!I,,Kiu t:: -n00 1i l� 1 �,' ±0 1 3S"10 avaiLlblt through Vlagship Athletic Club and Nonh+,rit kLhh!LiC C'lub- _ Fkaches i 4 1 it 0 _ 0 1 1 �^ Life Time Fitnes.s(Publiel"rivaie) •• Life Time Fitness & School District (Public Private) Source: City of Eden Prairie Para and Recreation Department, 2002 Eden Prairie Park and Open Space System Plan SR t )nsulting Group, Inc 3 -27 Locational Characteristics: Mini -parks can be public or privately owned and maintained and should be located within medium- and high - density residential areas whose population is not adequately serviced by neighborhood Barks. Mini- Parks. may also be located in single- family residential areas; however, their use should be limited to neighborhoods that cannot be seniced by neighborhood parks due to access, environmental barriers or unusual neighborhood needs: These parks should only be acquired and developed when absolutely necessary as they are very expensive to maintain on a cost per acre basis. Typical Facilities: • Seating areas • Smah picnic area • Totlot or small play structure • Facilities for seniors, such as horseshoe courts (in senior residential community) • Adequate pedestrian access (no vehicle access or parking should be provided) Neighborhood Parks Neighborhood Parks occur throughout the community and occur in a variety of settings. A number of the neighborhood parks are freestanding parks, seven to 40 acres in size. A second situation occurs where the neighborhood park has been integrated into a school site, thereby minimizing the duplication of active recreational facilities. Neighborhood parks may also be adjacent to or a part of the.community's- large conservation areas. In 1975, the City conducted a neighborhood facility study to determine what potential various sites had for development as neighborhood parks and to determine the current need for neighborhood parks. This study established a number of planning objectives, which have become the foundation for neighborhood park development, as noted below: 1. All existing land owned by the City should be inventoried and an analysis done to assess each facility's potential as .a future expansion site and use as a neighborhood playground. 2. Residential areas in the City that are not currently served by a neighborhood park should be identified and potential sites for development of neighborhood parks. studied and recommendations made. 3. The interrelationships between neighborhood parks and the rest of the park system should be strengthened through the proper location and use: of greenways, trails, underpasses and overpasses. 4: Ncighbbrhood parks may be adjacent to elementary schonls and located within walking distance (approximatelyone.- halfmile). In tw-o eases (Oak Point Intermediate and Cedar Ridge Elementary), the schools provide neighborhood recreation facilities, such as creative play structures, multiple use hard surface play court, and balltields for after school use by neighborhoods. Eden Prairie Park and Open Space System Plan SRF Consulting.Group, Inc 2 -4 '11110 types of facilities: found in Eden Prairie's neighborhood parks vary by activity requirements and site physical constraints: llie standards listed below define the.tacilities fr6luently found in neighborhood parks. • Soflballiliaseballfield(s) (for neighborhood or limited league use • Multiple -use, hard- surface play courts (basketball) • Crwtive play structure and apparatus 0 `tennis courts) • Open field for soccer or football (for limited league use) • Picnic area • -frail connections to community- wide;ltikeway /bikeway system. Vehicle parking.with 10 to 15 spaces (more spaces where league: use is anticipated) Facility Standards Service Area._ Approximately one -half mile radius uninterrupted by principal roadways or rajor physical barriers. Per Capita Slandaril; 2.5 to 3.5 developed acres per 1,000 population Desirable .Size ira Acres., Average park size of 15 to 18 acres with 7 to 10 acres developed. The remainder may be passive-or provide other functions. Primary FunctionlUser group J lie park should provide infonral neighborhood open space with provisions for active_ recreation use, which responds to residential neighborhood needs. Primary users will be, children and families. Neighborhood parks may also provide Facilities.for infot7tnal or organized athletic activities as overall system needs dictate. Locational Characteristics: Centrally iocated within service area or defined neighborhood, the park.may be adjacent to elementary or middle school facilities or other park elements. Primary itecess should occur by pedestrian or bicycle means. Neighborhood parks should be connected by the community trail system,. secondary meads should include vehicles with parking facilities provided. ,Adjacent land use should be residential on n maximum of two edges, school grounds,. collector roadway, and community open space, if facilities are provided for organized athletic activities, the site should provide sufficient parking to meet facility standards to minimize impact on the surrounding neighborhood. Fdcn Prairie Park and O} cn Space'SyMem Plan S1tF Co.nsiihing Group, lcic E9 2 -7 Natural characteristics should include topography, which has flat to rolling terrain with well - drained soils compatible with facility development. Vegetation should be representative of the neighborhood, partially wooded preferred. Visibility should allow good sight lines into parcel for park-security. Water, features representative of the area should be included if they are compatible with facility development and do not pose safety problems. Typical (ucililies, Active Playlields to accommodate informal or organized soRball, baseball or soccer • Creative play structures and apparatus for children. of varying ages • Trails • Sledding, • Tennis courts • Multi -usc, hard - surface plan court b.. Passive • Small picnic area • Park benches • Walking trails and trail connections C. Support Elements • Trash container • Landscaping with nativd plant materials • Identification sigh • Opportunity for parking (8 -10 vehicles or parking "standards for organized playrMds), handicap accessible Park shelter for principal neighborhood parks. (15 acres and larger); where skating is provided, or a summer playground program is planned. d. Other Guidelines, Neighborhood Parks • Active area should he oriented away from residential edges or appropriately screened • Parcels should not be fragmented in.layoul • Summer programming optional, where park shclwr is available • Outdoor hockey rinks with lighting and tree skating rinks may be located in neighborhood parks, where a park shelter is located. Additional parking amounting to 20-30 spaces should he provided adjacent to hockey rinks.. • Skating facilities should be developed on a 1.5 -2.0 mile service nidius' &n 'Prairie Park and Open Space System Plan ,SP C:ansulting Group, Inc 0 2 -8 Community Parks Community parks in Eden Prairie are sited adjacent to significant natural resources; such as lakes, scenic wooded areas, bluffs and creeks and are designed to serve the entire community. The City has six community parks (Birch Island, Round Lake, Miller, Riley take, Smetana Lake and Staring Lake) that are almost completely developed. Community parks are generally 40 acres in size or larger. l'he facilities typically found at any of these community parks include active and passive facilities, such as open playgrounds or other play areas for young children, playfields, paths and trails, picnic areas, and nature interpretation information. Support facilities usually include parking, restrooms, lighting and adequate waste collection and storage. The service area for community parks can extend as far as a3 -mile radius. Easy accessibility for all transportation modes, including transit service within a 114 mile of the park, bike and pedestrian connections, assists in managing demand for parking and congested access to the park. Facility Standards: Service. Area: Several neighborhoods within 2 to 3 -mile radius Per Capita Standcn•rl: 5 to 8 acres per 1,000 population Desirable Size in Acres: Minimum size 25 acres with 50 to 100 acres desirable Prirnai -v Funcrion/Us& Groups_ Extensive area for Ornmunhy -wide use, which may provide active, passive, educational, cultural or programmed functions for all age groups. Community parks should integrate unusual or attractive natural features, such as water bodies, into the park or preservation and recreational use. Cool access from collector or minor arterial roadways is desirable. Typical Facilities: a. Active • Beachfront • Boat access • Multi -use trails • Active facilities compatible with large group picnics, such as volleyball, horseshoes, softball, or court games. • Play structure(s) for various age groups. • Community playfields ifthere is sut�icient open, level land within the site. Edert Prairie Para: and Open Spacc System Plan Sid Consulting {croup, Inc' 0 2 -9 b. Passive • Picnic facilities • Park benches Fishing- Nature interpretation C. Support Facilities • Comfort facilities with restrooms, which may integrate an information center,, picnic facility, storage or other building requirements • Parking • Signage • Adequate waste collection acid storage; Community Athletic Fields Community athletic fields provide competition.level facilities for organized adult and youth play and are often heavily programmed for tournaments,. The majority of the tigers" of these facilities live bevond a walking range and, as a result, will require adequate parking and restroorns.. Transit .5ervice within a 114 mile of these sites is a valuable advaniateto siting community athletic fields, because it reduces parking needs and permits non - drivers to take City transit service to team practice or-toumaments held at facilities within reach of transit service. 'The following types of amenities are found in coinfriunity athletic field facilities., softball fields, baseball fields, soccer or football. fields, multiple tennis.courts,.hockey rinks.and skating rinks_ These facilities should be designed and developed for league competition. Lighting and irrigation of the facilities will cKtend th6ir use. Based upon the City's priority, a community athletic field should have direct access from a major thoroughfare and should range in size from 20 to 60 acres with larger sites being more desirable to allow for support facilities and tournament type: competition- The Gity presently has one freestanding community athletic field located at Flying Cloud Airport_ The City has teased approximately 35 acres of land. from the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAQ on which youth ball fields have been de eloped Eiien Prairie has.also.developed community, athletic fields at Round Iyake Park, Riley Lake Park and Miller Park. Facility Standards Ser vice Are a; Community -Nvide f'e), Capf[a Slajz4ard,- 2 to 2.5: developed acres per 1,000 pppulat1011 Desirable Size in Acres; Minimum of 20 developed acres, niaximutn 60 developed acres. Eden Prairiz Park and Open Space System Plan SRF Consulting Group, Inc_. 2 -10 Primary FunctionlUser Groups: Participants in- athletic activities, which may be organized or informal,. who- utilize the athletic fields and court facilities. Gocatio" ial Ch&acteristics: Facilities should be located close to community collectoror minor arterial roadway on a site with minimal change in topography. Proximity to secondary schools may be desirable to allow for shared use of facilities. Non - residential adjacent land uses are preferred due to potential field lighting: Facilities should be centrally located within the community or may- be dispersed if, multiple. sites are d6cloped and distributed through the :community. Community play fields may he incorporated within community parks .if the community park has sufficient. land. Typical Facilities: a. Active • Baseball Softball • Football • Socoer • lee Hockey • Basketball • Tennis • Free Skating b_ Passive + Spectator seating and bleacher areas :. Picnic facilities • Trails connecting facilities C_ Support Facilities • Vehicle parking • Comfort facility, including restrooms and concessions • Storage facilities C:bnservation Areas The National Park and Recreation Association.encourages communities to try to reach a goal of protecting 10 percent of the community. as permanent open space:, Eden Prairie contains approximately 23,000 acres of land; therefore, the goal according to the National Recreation and Park Association . would be to protect 2,300 acres of land-in parks and open splice. At this tinie, the.. City owns approximately 2,500. acres of land designated parks and open space. Other public agencies oval large parcels of land, within or adjacent to the City's boundaries. Threc Rivers Park Eden Prairie Park and Open Spa" System Plan SW Consulting Croup, ing ME *There are 3 hockey rinks that are within 1 -114 miles of Todd Park ( #30) 417 - Highland Park (less than 1/2 mile) 9#2 - Arden Park (1 mile) 435 - Weber Park 0 '/4 mile At,00v'T -i W_ N Edna INTEFUCHEN BOULEVARD 37 Cm E 0 s 26 cam. 0 W .c 22w 41 BENTON AVENUE .1 E;.. W- Maintaining Edina's Vision for Preserving Green Spaces ■ ME M CO W. 42ND I 50TH STAEET'�[= C ❑C l W 13 Getting to know Todd Park Although Todd Park is 33 acres — it is only 5.9 "moveable" acres. The remaining 27.1 acres are woods and wetland .s Maintaining Edina's Vision for Preserving Green Spaces 1y Todd Park is surrounded by homes on all four sides Maintaining Ak r �e(7 �I r approximate scale = 1;2707 Edina's Vision for Preserving Green Spaces 19 Park is developed to capacity f *, approximate scale = 1;2707 *Maintaining Edina's Vision for Preserving Green Spaces From: John Keprios 'ent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 6:55 AM o: Alice Hulbert (E- mail); Ann Swenson (E- mail); Jim Hovland (E- mail); Linda Masica (E- mail); Scot Housh (E -mail) Cc: Gordon Hughes Subject: Executive Summary Dear Mayor and Council Members: The following is an executive summary of our special Park Board meeting last night. On Tuesday, July 26, the Park Board held a special meeting upon my request to readdress the Todd Park hockey rink recommendation they made at their June 14th meeting. The reason I requested a special meeting was due to input from the Edina Hockey Association President and Ice Coordinator who told me that EHA would prefer that the Park Board spend their resources on placing an outdoor hockey rink at Lewis Park rather than Todd Park. Those EHA representatives were at the special meeting last night to testify to that fact. EHA would prefer a second rink at Lewis Park-because they are interested in funding a feasibility study and build facilities needed to maintain two hockey rinks at Lewis Park with a Zamboni ice - resurfacing machine. There was lengthy discussion and debate, plus input from several resident neighbors of Todd Park. The neighborhood was not notified of this special meeting because they were invited to attend Park Board meetings on two previous occasions. The end result was that the Park Board chose to stay with their recommendation .iade at their June meeting, which is to build and maintain a permanent outdoor hockey rink at Todd Park. The Park Board also appears to have a desire to pursue building additional outdoor hockey rinks in the near future. I explained to the Park Board that we currently have enough maintenance staff in place today to maintain a hockey rink at Todd Park and convert Countryside Park into a general skating area. I further explained that we would not have enough manpower to add any other additional outdoor hockey rinks without more manpower. We would not be able to place a hockey rink back at Countryside Park or add another rink at Lewis Park without additional manpower. This Park Board recommendation is scheduled to be on the Tuesday, August 16, Council agenda. I have already mailed over 200 letters to Todd Park neighbors notifying them that this issue will be on the August 161' Council agenda. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Many thanks. John Keprios, Director Edina Park & Recreation Department 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Voice: (952) 826 -0430 Fax: (952) 826 -0385 jkeprios@ci.edfna.mn.us i Alternative Solutions *Mainfaining Edina's Vision for Preserving Green Spaces ,ct Lewis Park — 21 acres — 14.9 mowable acres Facilities: Football, Hockey Rink, Play Structure, Skating, Soccer, Tennis, Walking Paths, Warming House and a Parking lot Existing Rink Possible Site Notes: Ease of maintaining 2 rinks on the same site. Possibility of Zamboni being housed on site in the future. _9b" a& Maintaining Edina's Vision for Preserving Green Spaces i C. Walnut Ridge — 44 acres - 9.5 mowable acres Facilities: Hockey Rink, Play Structure, Skating, Tennis, Walking Paths, Comfort Station and a Parkinq lot (with a basketball hoop) j �'1,' *e; Existing Rink Possible Sites Notes: Ease of maintaining 2 rinks on the same site. Plenty of room for recreational skating. A few homes that are set back and have wooded areas between them and the park Maintaining Edina's Vision for approximate scale s 1;2707 I'M Pamela Park — 62 acres — 24.8 mowable acres Facilities: Football, Hockey Rink, Play Structure, Skating, Soccer, Softball (3), Tennis, Warming House and 3 Parking lots Existing Rink Possible Sites Notes: Ease of maintaining 2 rinks on the same site Plenty of room for recreational skating. A couple of homes that are set back and have wooded areas between them and the park r+ a. *Maintaining Edina -s Vision for Preservi. ,y 171 - i U/ Highlands — 44 acres — 14.5 mowable acres Facilities: Football, Hockey Rink, Play Structure, Skating, Soccer (3), Softball, Tennis, Warming House and 2 Parking lots Existing Rink Possible Site Notes: Ease of maintaining 2 rinks on the same site No homes near the hockey rink Possible site could accommodate 165' rink *Maintaining Edina's Vision for I _ f Garden Park — 19 acres — 11.1 mowable acres Facilities: Baseball, Play Structure, Soccer (2), Softball, Tennis (2), Restroom Facilities and 1 Parking lot No Existing Rink Possible Site .i4- AW Notes: Image suggests an 190' rink No homes near the hockey rink More than adequate parking remains approximate scale = 1:2707 Maintaining Edina's Vision for Preserving Green Spaces a s ' 015 Todd Park — 33 acres — 5.9 mowable acres Facilities: Basketball, Play Structure, Skating, Tennis (2), Walking Path, Comfort Station and No Parking lot 1. pia! 1• x "Lx i Notes: Homes on all 4 sides in very close' . proximity — No sight or sound barrier Currently developed`! '. to capacity A. M-w AL approximate scale - 1:2707 Maintaining Edina's Vision for Preserving Green Spaces No Existing Rink Proposed Site Em Pamela Par: Maintaining Edina's Vision for Preserving Green Spaces approximate AP [fi�i f� — 1;10830 as DISCLAIMER: The City of Edina makes no representation or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the reuse of the electronic data provided herewith, regardless of its format or the means of its transmission. There is no guarantee or representation to the user as to the accuracy, currency, suitability, or reliability of this data for any purpose. The user accepts the data 'as is', and assumes all risks associated with its use. By acceptance of this data, the user agrees not to transmit this data or provide access to it or any part of it to another party unless the user shall include with the data a copy of this disclaimer. The City of Edina assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data. *Maintaining Edina -s Vision for Preserving Green Spaces Maintaining Edimnals Vision for Preserving Green Spaces Todd Park (Current) Countryside Park We Can't Grow More Parks Maintaining Edina "s Vision for Preserving Green Spaces aq w9�,1 i oe 1-+t B8 REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item VI.C. From: ERIC ANDERSON Consent ❑ ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER Information Only ❑ Date: AUGUST 16, 2005 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ® Motion POLICY ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion RECOMMENDATION: , � ° Adopt attached Special Assessment Policy. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Staff and Council have had four work sessions since the beginning of 2005 reviewing the residential road reconstruction program and how the City assesses those costs. Staff is recommending an increase in road reconstruction projects over a period of the next few years. The projects that were reviewed for feasibility in 2005 have resulted in substantially higher costs than prior assessment years. In addition, there has been greater resistance from neighborhoods to have curb and gutter installed in areas where it does not exist today. As a result of the increased costs and the resistance to pay for them, the City engaged a consultant to review some of the proposed project areas and determine if the cost of the projects generate the equivalent market value benefit to the homeowners. If the costs were higher than the benefit, the City would be at risk for legal challenges to the assessments. Results of the study indicated that the proposed assessable costs do match up with the market value benefit to the homes. 9 REPORT/ RECOMMENDATION - Special Assessment Policy August 16, 2005 Staff also conducted an extensive survey of other communities road reconstruction programs and how the cities assess /pay for those costs. Results of the survey showed a combination of tax supported expenditures with varying assessment practices in those communities. ` The new special assessment policy being proposed takes the information we gathered and proposes a number of changes to the current assessment policies that the City uses today. Staff will have a presentation highlighting the reasons for a need to change the current policy, a brief overview of the appraisal report and city assessment survey, and the proposed changes to current assessment policy. 2 0 Special Assessment Policy Proposal August 16, 2005 1. Cost of Non -State Aid Residential Street Curb and Gutter will be financed by the Stormwater Utility Fund. For the 2004 -2005 assessment projects, this will require an increase in Storm water rates of approximately $2.00 per household per quarter. Rationale — The curb and gutter system is an above - the - ground water drainage system that controls storm water within the City. Staff feels very strongly about the addition of curb and gutter in the City where it does not exist today. It is very important in areas of poor soil condition, steep grade changes or very flat conditions. It also decreases the degradation of the residential roadway system, reduces fall and spring street maintenance and aids in street cleaning and snow plowing. Projects to be reimbursed by proposed change (to be assessed Oct. 2005): Halifax & Grimes - $137,000 (approx 24% of street costs) Shannon Dr. - $18,000 (100% of assessable costs) Sunnyslope - $40,000 (6% of assessable costs) Bridge Lane - $10,000 (9% of assessable costs) Schaefer Circle - $14,000 (petition requesting C &G only if policy is approved) Total $ 219,000 Curb and Gutter Cost Projections for Future Year Assessment Projects: Estimated cost for 2006 - $441,000 ( +2.14 per household per quarter) Estimated cost for 2007 - $621,000 ( +1.56 /per household per - quarter) Attachment: Survey of Stormwater Utility Rates 2005 Note: Stormwater rates will need approximately a $1.50 - $2.00 per quarter increase to cover the cost of projects occurring independent of this policy. If adopted, staff will be proposing a $4.00 per household per quarter increase this fall. 2. Street Reconstruction Cost (excluding curb and gutter) should be assessed at 100% of the cost. Rationale - Based on an appraisal study conducted by the Valuation Group, the consultants indicated that the market value benefit of the street improvements equates to the cost of the improvements being done. Assuming Council agrees with the financing of curb and gutter improvements, the risk of losing an assessment challenge by a resident or neighborhood is diminished due to the extensive study that was conducted and the subsidy of the curb and gutter cost. In most projects, the street Page 1 of 5 reconstruction cost represents only a percentage of the entire project costs. Most projects include other storm water improvements as well as sanitary sewer and water system improvements. The table below shows the total and assessable costs of projects that will be assessed this fall or next year depending on construction completion. Project Cost of All Improvements Curb &< Gutter Assessable Cost % Assessable Halifax & Grimes $ 888,900 $ 137,000 $ 420,000 47% So. Harriet Park $ 1,029,872 $ - $ 588,000 57% Sunn sloe $ 1,028,218 $ 40,000 $ 663,000 64% Schaefer Rd. $ 264,290 $ - $ 195,000 74% Shannon Dr. $ 168,719 $ 18,000 $ - 0% Bridge Lane $ 106,601 $ 9,975 $ 97,000 91% 3. The assessable unit for non -state aid residential street projects should be the residential equivalent unit (Lot) rather than the front footage of the lot. Rationale — Trips generated for residential lots are the same regardless of the size of the lot. A resident on a corner lot, cul -de -sac or circular street does not use the roads differently than a mid -block resident on the same street. 4. If a corner lot is subject to multiple street reconstruction assessments over a period of years, the total assessable cost should be the equivalent to 1 residential equivalent unit. Rationale — Current policy allows the assessment of the front of a corner lot to be assessed at one R.E.U. and the side lot for another assessment project to be assessed at 1/3 of an R.E.U. Staff believes that the,total of both assessments should not exceed one R.E.U. so that lots are equitably assessed over the City. A corner lot does not generate more trips onto the residential roadway system than a non -corner lot. 5. Multiple Assessments cannot be treated differently than areas with one assessment being incurred. Rationale — Assessments must be equitable to all homes that are being assessed. This issue was driven by the potential of a portion of the Country Club being assessed for sound walls and residential road reconstruction. If and when the Country Club area gets assessed for street improvements, you have the option to re -assess the sound wall improvement to a longer term. By re- assessing, the Council opens the assessment up to a potential challenge. If a challenge was raised, you could leave the sound wall assessment at the current term of 15 years and decide not to re- assess. Page 2 of 5 r it 6. The term of residential roadway reconstruction assessments should stay at 10 years. Rationale — There was some discussion of.extending the term of residential roadway reconstruction to 15 years. While this would be legal, rating agencies prefer the term for residential assessments to match the term of the bonds. This would also increase the interest cost to.the homeowner 7. Assessment Interest Rate — The interest rate of the assessment should be pegged to the assessment bonds that have been issued in the past 12 months or the 10 year Aaa bond rate plus 2 %. Rationale — The City's assessments of the past number of years have been charged a fixed rate of 6.5 %. The number and dollar amount of improvement projects have allowed the City to internally finance the, capital cost of the improvements. With the amount of improvements occurring this year and in future years, the City has incorporated a public debt component to the special assessment process. The bonds are General Obligation (G.O.) debt that is used to pay the construction costs and are supported by the stream of assessment payments over the term of the bonds (10 years). Because the City is using G.O. public improvement bonds to finance the improvements, State law requires that the amount of assessments (or taxes) that come in each year must egua1105% of the debt service payment on the bonds for each year. In order to achieve the necessary 105 %, the assessment interest rate needs to be pegged at the bond's interest rate plus 2% or approximately 5.9 %. Some cities have a lower rate than this because they have taxes supporting the bonds or they internally finance their public improvements. Of the cities we studied, only one had a lower interest rate than the one staff is proposing. city Calculation Index Assessment Rate Edina Bond Rate + 2% 3.92% 5.92% Bloomington Bond Rate + 1 % 3.92% 4.92% Plymouth Prime Rate +.5% 6.25% 6.75% Fridley None 6.50% maple Grove None 6.00% The excess dollars generated by the statutory 105% requirement is used to make up for cost of bond issuance, delinquencies and underpayments. 8. The City will accept both partial pre - payments and full pre - payments on assessments before going to the County for tax rolls. For ease of administration, a minimum of 25% of the assessable cost must be applied for a partial payment. Page 3 of 5 I Rationale — City past practice allowed only 100% pre - payment on assessments. Many residents have inquired in the past about partial pre - payments to reduce their annual tax bill. This will create some extra calculations, but this is a good public relations move with a minor increase in workload. The full and partial pre - payments can only occur after the assessment hearing and before the certification to the County. This is gives the resident approximately 30 days to make the payment. Staff will make sure extra information is provided to the residents when they get their formal assessment notice information before the hearings. 9. Payment Schedule — Currently, assessments are calculated on a level principal payment schedule. This results in a declining payment schedule which is cheaper than a traditional amortized schedule which would have equal payments over the life of the assessment. Staff recommends that the declining balance schedule continue to be used because of the lower total cost. Rationale — See payment schedules attached. Council could provide an option on more expensive projects to select an amortized level payment schedule, but this needs to be selected for the entire project. The amount of time provided to staff to certify the assessments to the County doesn't allow for mixing and matching of payment schedules for each assessment project. 10. The new policy will not be retroactive to projects that have already been assessed. Rationale: It would be very difficult to determine how many years to go back and re- assess projects that have been completed and already assessed. Looking back at projects that were assessed since 1999, most of the projects were assessed at a cost per lot of around $2,000 - $4,000 per lot. The 2004 Maple Rd./White Oaks assessment cost $5,941 per lot. This year's projects have taken a substantial jump in total cost due to the need to reconstruct vs. reclaim the street pavement. Estimates for this year's project range from $7,200 /lot for So. Harriet Park to $11,000/lot for Sunnyslope. As we forecast future street projects, our estimates indicate most will be in the $8,000 - $12,000 per lot range. Our research with other City's policies indicates that all cities made a clean break when beginning their new programs. Page 4 of 5 A couple of elements of the Senior Deferral Program should change for equity and fairness. Rationale: a.. The current interest rate for the deferral program is one percentage point higher than the standard assessment rate. This should be changed to reflect the new interest rate adopted in this policy (bond rate plus 2 %) b. The current deferral policy requires that both spouses live in the residence. This should be changed to reflect situations that have one of the spouses residing in a facility that accommodates health care situations (i.e. assisted living centers, etc.) Some other administrative changes (application dates, etc.) would be made to the policy. If Council agrees with the changes to the Senior Deferral Program, Staff would prepare the appropriate resolution to bring back to Council for approval in September. Page 5 of 5 Survey of Residential Annual Storm Water Utility Charges for Various Cities in the Metropolitan Area 2003 Rates 2004 Rates 2005 Rates 2005 Single- Family Single - Family Single- Family S.F. Residential Residential Residential Quarterly Ci er lot per lot per lot . - Rate Golden Valley $ 72.00 $ 75.96 $ 87.20 $ 21.80 New Hoe $ 48.60 $ 66.84 $ 68.88 $ 17.22 Burnsville $ 62.60 $ 68.00 $ 68.00 $ 17.00 Savage $ 57.00 $ 62.76 $ 62.76 $ 15.69 Woodbury $ 40.00 $ 61.00 $ 61.00 $ 15.25 St. Paul $ 52.00 $ 54.60 $ 55.42 $ 13.85 Bloomington $ 43.74 $ 45.84 $ 48.13 $ 12.03 Hopkins $ 48.00 $ 48.00 $ 48.00 $ 12.00 Apple Valley $ 47.76 $ 47.76 $ 47.76 $ 11.94 Brooklyn Center. $ 47.40 $ 47.40 $ 47.40 $ 11.85 Duluth $ 45.00 $ 45.00 $ 45.00 $ 11.25 Plymouth $ 39.00 $ 39.00 $ 44.52 $ 11.13 Minnetonka $ 30.00 $ 42.00 $ 42.00 $ 10.50 Cottage Grove $ 20.00 $ 21.00 $ 40.00 $ 10.00 Shoreview $ 37.92 $ 37.92 $ 38.88 $ 9.72 Richfield $ 36.24 $ 37.32 $ 38.44 $ 9.61 Wayzata $ 33.72 $ 34.56 $ 36.29 $ 9.07 Eagan $ 27.08 $ 27.96 $ 29.36 $ 7.34 St. Louis Park $ 24.00 $ 28.80 $ 28.80 $ 7.20 Coon Ra ids $ 26.00 $ 26.00 $ 28.60 •' $ 7.15 Shakopee $ - I $ 24.06 $ 24.06 $ 6.02 Brooklyn Park $ 22.00 $ 22.00 $ 22.00 $ 5.50 Chanhassen $ 20.00 $ 20.00 $ 20.00 $ 5.00 Oakdale $ - $ 20.00 $ 20.00 $ 5.00 Roseville $ 18.40 $ 19.00 $ 19.76 $ 4.94 Lakeville $ 19.00 $ 19.00 $ 19.00 $ 4.75 Eden Praire $ 12.00 $ 12.00 $ 12.00 $ 3.00 Median $. 34.98 $ 37.62 $ 39.44. $ 9.86 Average $ 34.10 $ 38.54 $ 40.37 $ 10.09 Note: 2001 Rates were used from the 2001 Storm Water Utility Business Plan not all Cities were surveyed in 2001 Minnetonka is planning on raising the rate in February 2005. Option 1: Level Principal Payments Levy $ 12,000 Interest Rate 6% Term 10 years Year $ 12,000 Principal Interest Total Pa ent $910.42 Balance 1 $ 1,200 $ 720 $ 1,920, $ 10,800 2 $ 1,200 $ 648 $ 1,848 $ 9,600 3 $ 1,200 $ 576 $ 1,776 $ 8,400 4 $ 1,200 $ 504 $ 1,704 $ 7,200 5 $ 1,200 $ 432 $ 1,632 $ 6,000 6 $ 1,200 $ 360 $ 1,560 $ 4,800 7 $ 1,200 $ 288 $ 1,488 $ 3,600 8 $ 1,200 $ 216 $ 1,416 $ 2,400 9 $ 1,2001$ 144 $ 1,344 $ 1,200, 101$ 1,200 1 $ 72 $ 1,272' $ - Total Cost $ 15,960 Option 2: Amortized Level Total Payment Le $ 12,000 Interest Rate 6% Term 10 Year Principal Interest Total Payment Balance 1 $910.42 $ 720 $1,630.42 11,089.58 2 $965.04 665.38 $1,630.42 10,124.54 3 $1,022.94 607.47 $1,630.42 9,101.60 4 $1,084.32 546.10 $1,630.42 8,017.28 5 $1,149.38 481.04 $1,630.42 6,867.90 6 $1,218.34 412.07 $1,630.42 5,649.56 7 $1,291.44 338.97 $1,630.42 4,358.12 8 $1,368.93 261.49 $1,630.42 2,989.19 9 $1,451.06 179.35 $1,630.42 1 1,538.13 10 $1,538.13 92.29 $1,630.42 0.00 Total Cost 1 $16,304.15 Option 2 is 2.16% More Expensive v Client Appraiser City of Edina Thomas J. Day, MAI, SRA 4801 West 50th Street MN Certified General Real Property Appraiser #4000814 Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Type of Engagement Appraisal consulting assignment pertaining to special as- sessment policy and market value benefit associated with new street reconstruction in sample neighborhoods within Edina, Minnesota Property Name and Location Three sample neighborhoods studied: South Harriet Park Sunnyslope Rolling Green All located in Edina, Minnesota The Valuation Group File Number 250168 Property Types Detached residential properties within established neigh- borhoods having good locational appeal, mostly quality housing, and strong market values Property Rights Appraised The fee - simple interest has been appraised. Not included in the value opinions are any personal property Valuation Dates Date of values: June 24, 2005 Date of neighborhood inspections: Several dates during March, April and May of 2005 Date of report: June 24, 2005 ■' INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (CONTINUED) Summary of Conclusions Our study has included the following work: Within our resales and paired sales analysis, a total of 39 properties have been used for detailed study. Some iden- a ■ Resales analysis —study of neighborhoods where tified sales indicated no value benefit, yet many of these new streets have recently occurred. This includes sold during the late 1990s where the 10% time adjustment identifying and studying properties which sold., might not be fully supported, or where, there is some un- twice--first recently before the street reconstruc- certainty with the features or condition of the comps. tion, and secondly after completion of the project to provide a value benefit indication. Following are a summary chart and table. Due to market �.a irregularities, a few resales /paired sales indicate" a nega- tive benefit, and a few indicate exorbitant amounts. The where new streets have recently occurred; com- majority, however, indicate a typical benefit of $6,000 to parable before and after sales are analyzed to pro- $15,000. duce value benefit indications. ~ ■ Survey of property owners who have recently ex- With omitting the extremes, the average value indication is perienced street reconstruction. $11,666, and the median amount is $9,700. The percent- Survey of Realtors who are active in Edina. age mid - points are 3.4% to 4.0% of total property value. " ■ ■ Survey of experienced professional real estate ap- t praisers. 12 10 p 8 6 w^ L H 4 Z 2 0 Resales /Paired Sales Value Benefit Indications Histogram of Value Benefit Indications (Extremes omitted) Less than $3000 $3001 to $6000 $6001t0$9000 $9001 to $1Z'W1 to W01talI Pa v v% ;w v'+W,VV+ $12,000 $15,00# Value Benefit ~ L 4 t Less than $3000 $3001 to $6000 $6001t0$9000 $9001 to $1Z'W1 to W01talI Pa v v% ;w v'+W,VV+ $12,000 $15,00# Value Benefit - -- INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (CONTINUED) Summary of Resale an Paired Sale Conclusions Location set Resales $ Benefit % Benefit Paired Sales $ Benefit % Benefit White Oaks 1 51580 1.02% 27,860 4.89% White Oaks 2 18,480 4.50% White Oaks 3 98,700 14.33% White Oaks 4 6,060 1.14% White Oaks 5 16,500 2.23% White Oaks 6 19,750 3.29% Pamela Park 7 5,100 1.41% 48,550 12.73% Pamela Park 8 38,700 11.34% 12,900 3.51% 9,550 2.586A School Road 9 8,100 2.98% 8.500 3.13% 10,900 4.05% So. Tyrol Hills 10 18,900 10.440/6 (2,140) -1.06% So. Tyrol Hills 11 32,500 8.51% 7,100 1.74% So. Tyrol Hills 12 8,000 3.51% 14,300 6.10% So. Tyrol Hills 13 12,500 2.51% So. Tyrol Hills 14 8,200 1.84% 51,200 12.68% So. Tyrol Hills 15 26,300 8.00% So. Tyrol Hills 16 (26,900) - 8.23°k (31,250) -9.43% 22,750 8.21 %, So. Tyrol Hills 17 25,000 4.55% So. Tyrol Hills 18 (1,000) -0.58% Misc Golden Valley 19 9,000 5.26% Misc Golden Valley 20 7,300 3.37% Misc Golden Valley 21 1,900 0.15% Misc Golden Valley 22 7,000 1.09% Misc Golden Valley 23 1,000 0.60% Misc Golden Valley 24 6,400 2.99% Misc Golden Valley 25 74,000 38.44% Misc Golden Valley 26 8,500 7.23% Misc Golden Valley 27 14,017 6.15% Misc Golden Valley 28 4,000 2.11% Misc Golden Valley 29 9,000 3.74% Misc Golden Valley 30 9,900 5.50% Misc Golden Valley 31 19,000 9.31% Shoreview 32 17,000 5.70% Woodbury 33 13,800 6.24% Bloomington 34 3,500 1.80% Brooklyn Center .35 9,850 6.12% Minnetonka 36 14,000 3.37% Minnetonka 37 14,500 5.13% Minnetonka 38 (5,000) -1.53% Eden P. ralde 39 440 1.72°x6 Low (26,9 -8 23% (31,2;,0) -8.43% :High 74 38.44 %� 98;700 1'4.33% , Average 10,794, 4.73% 20, 256 468% . Median 8,5W 3.51% 14,300 Combined Average 14,769 4.71 % Without extremes: 1000: 0:15% 5,580 a, 1.02% :High x 3. 2500M 10.44% 27,860 821% Average 9;976 4.19% 14,202 3.67% Median 8 750 3.82% 12,700 3.21% ;.. ` f Combined Average . E.:. 11 666> " 3.98% 4_ Combined 9 7,00" '3,44% ,Median INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (CONTINUED) IBM RE Ngmills"'Jill I 11111111 Appraiser Survev Telephone interviews were conducted with 22 experienced ® Rolling Green value benefit ranged :'from $0 to residential real estate appraisers in the Twin Cities metro- $25,000 per property, having an average of $13,972, ` politan area familiar with Edina real estate. and a median of $15,000.° Many appraisers stated new street improvements, including new curb and All appraisers' opinions and comments were used in our gutter, would enhance this neighborhood least of analysis. The results obtained are summarized as fol- the three presented, relative to costs. The feeling lows: was that it is,a unique area providing very upscale residents with °country ".living, yet still being, very m 20 appraisers (91%) expressed a positive opin- close in to the City of Minneapolis and its opportu- ion of new street improvements; 2 were negative nities. The majority feel the curb and gutter benefit which dealt with the Rolling Green neighborhood. is minimal within this neighborhood. Positive comments generally mentioned improved ® General comments on curb" and gutter were most appearance and appeal. Many commented their positive in South Harriet Park, and least, in Rolling" opinions could vary based on the condition of the Green, yet there were a full range ofopinions- some; original street, with streets in poor condition obvi- Were very supportive of the value, benefit in all 3 ously receiving a greater benefit than those in okay neighborhood, others were more neutral, and a few condition. were negative for Rolling Green :`Sunnyslope was ■ Value benefit results for South Harriet Party ranged considered between the' other two neighborhoods. from $2,000 to $10,000, with an average of $7,461 Based upon general comments, we :have ranked and a median of $10,000 per property. Many felt them into 3 categories: curb 8 gutter benefit ,is this neighborhood would receive the greatest ben- 100%+ of cost, 50 %;of cost or "minimal ". 9 were "mi efit return relative to the cost from new streets and ranked at :100%, 8 were 50%,' and 6 were _ n new curb and gutter due to its "urban" feel. me. Nearly all of the "minimal ", were, exclusive.to Rolling :Green, and some 50% rankings were for ® Sunnyslope value benefit ranged from $2,000 both Rolling Green and Sunnyslope. to $17 500 averaging $10 939 and a median of 0 $11,200 per property. Opinions were mixed about the benefit of new curb and gutter in this commu- nity, since many residents prefer the "country" look without them. 4 Combined Three Neighborhoo&Ppinions k P x 13 South Harriet Park ` 10 Nrt�y� Green v F C! L s H r„ O 6 ' z z Under $2000 $2000 to $5001 to $8001 to $10,001 to $14,001 to Over $5000 $8" $10,000 $14,000 $18,060: $1800.: New Street Market Value Benefit 4 INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (CONTINUED) Telephone interviews were conducted with numerous ho -' ' meowners in the neighborhoods of White Oaks in Edina, and South Tyrol Hills in Golden Valley. These subdivisions. had recent street improvements, and their values and ap= peal were felt to be similar to some of the subject neigh- borhoods. Both neighborhoods where interviews..occurred indicated positive opinions of new street improvements, yet the Edina neighborhood had stronger positive views. White Oaks Homeowner Survey Summary Chart (Total New Streets Project) x n�9 0. 0 1 -10 Scale of Benefit White Oaks Homeowner Survey Summary Chart (New Streets Component) � I 'Zr r�tro � 1 •r r 1 -10 Sole of Benefit White Oaks Homeowner Survey Summary Chart (Curb & Gutter Component) oa , i[ I O 1 -10 Scale of Benefit ~, I p 7 fi a' 0 I 0 South Tyrol Hills Homeowner Survey Summary; Chart (Total New Streets Project 1- 10'Sale of Benefit y South Tyrol Hills Homeowner Survey Summary Chart (Total New Streets Project) a . 0 1 -10 Scale of Benefit I South Tyrol Hills Homeowner Survey Summary Chart (Total New Streets Project) I S Z f _fit n .... �. O 1. 1.10 Scale of Benefit L. • 0. 1- 10'Sale of Benefit y South Tyrol Hills Homeowner Survey Summary Chart (Total New Streets Project) a . 0 1 -10 Scale of Benefit I South Tyrol Hills Homeowner Survey Summary Chart (Total New Streets Project) I S Z f _fit n .... �. O 1. 1.10 Scale of Benefit L. • Special Assessment Comparison Matrix — August 2005 U Bloomington Plymouth Golden Valley Fridley Wayzata Maple Grove • Use a Pavement • Pavement Management System • Use a Pavement Management Management Program to rate Manag prioritizes streets for maintenance Program to rate condition of condition of streets (0 -100) and rehabilitation • Sealcoat every 8 • Reconstruction based . Most streets constructed in streets • Evaluate 1/3 of streets each . Average Life of a street is 50 years on evaluation using 1970's. �. • 60 year road lifecycle • year Reconstruction needed for years • Curb and Gutter Mandated Pavement Management Plan • Move to reclaim (full depth a• 2 -3 sealcoats over first 20 -25 streets with ratings below 50 • Sealcoat 2 times in first 10 years • Move to replace • Sealcoat every 6 mill and overlay) many of a years • Full Depth Mill and Overlay • Mill and Overlay at 20 -25 years asphalt curbs with Yeas the streets • Mill and overlay (year 20 -25) 20 for streets rated 50 -75 on a Curb and Gutter street if concrete curb and • Curb and Gutter not • Sealcoat around 3 and 12 — maybe a 3 before • 2 more sealcoats over next • Seal coat every 6 years • Reconstruct @ 50 years or, gutter mandated years a� years (approx. 3 times) street has no Curb &Gutter o . Currently recon/mill • Use of Asphalt Curbs • Mill and Overlay Reclaim 20 th Y � a� • Mill and Overlay —year 40 • Curb and Gutter Mandated • Opt out program for C &G — 70% and overlay 1 in some areas at year . Y > a • • 1 Sealcoat (year 40 -50) Reconstruction 60 -70 • Temporary Overlays may be required except if: o ➢ Grade I% or less mile /year need to • New subdivisions . Some street reconstruction if no curb and gutter exists • year Curb and Gutter Mandated to used to delay reconstruction — life of temp overlay 5 -7 o ➢ Grade 8% or greater increase to 4 miles /year require concrete curb and gutter today allow program to work ➢ Property abutting below years grade of street • 25% Assessment to Single • 30% Assessment to Single • $3,200 Single Family Assessment • Assess Single Family • Assessed 3 projects • 50% Single Family/Duplex Family and duplexes Family (covers the mandated 20% bond concrete curb and in 10 years Street Assessment • 50% Assessment to all other • Assessments made on a per requirement with driveway gutter cost of the • Residential Road • Assessment is for property types lot (parcel) basis option) project (currently Reconstruction, reclaiming streets built in • Overlays paid by general • Multi - Family converted to • Neighborhood may opt out of $14.41 /foot ($1,000- sealcoating, etc. the 70's taxes /debt levy and or state aid equivalent of minimum Curb and Gutter if 70% oppose 2,000 /lot) covered by City • 2005 Est. Assessment is maintenance funds Single Family Lot size (never been used) • Exempt Property Funds $3,200 /lot for reclaiming • New Subdivisions Assessed (Area/18,500) • Residents may replace driveways treated the same as • Previous Properties and around $5,000 for 100% and must have concrete • C/I Area/18,500 to equiv. with bid contract costs at time of single family assessed include reconstruction acurb and gutter Units (Exempt property street recon. • Balance picked up by county road, Wayzata • Curb and Gutter cost to • Assessed on a front footage basis treated as C /1) • Multi - family assessed at 37% of Taxes/Reserves Blvd. — assessed resident equals difference • Changed from 100% to 25% • Curb and Gutter Mandated construction cost • Curb and Gutter benefited properties between asphalt and ate' assessment in 1992 — and Assessed for • Exempt Property assessed at 45% Mandated for cost of sidewalks concrete curb or approx. justification was new Pavement reconstruction or repair — if of project cost • Commercial Property $350 /lot y Management Plan to extend life asphalt curbs exist — • All other land uses (C/I, office) 100% Assessment • Assessment increases each y of streets conversion to Concrete assessed at 45% of project cost year by Construction Cost occurs and assessed at 100% • If Concrete Roadway exists, Index about 4% • Plymouth moving to a 40% residents may opt to continue assessment rate in 2005/2006 concrete at same rate as other • Overlays will be assessed at single family plus 100% of cost same rate difference between concrete and asphalt • Mill and Overlays are not assessed • Assessable cost increased by Construction Cost Index Annually Special Assessment Comparison Matrix — August 2005 • Bloomington Plymouth Golden Valley Fridley Wayzata Maple Grove U • Single Family and duplex lots a• Use State Aid Maintenance and assessed on a per unit basis some State Aid Construction • Assessment will be approximately a ° funds to pay for Pavement 25% of the standard residential rate r Management Program - g • Same Assessment • Multiple Dwelling lots assessed on a p g • State Aid Street • No State Aid Received — • Don't allow residents to y $800,000 maintenance plus Methodology as Non- front foot basis at approximately Reconstruction under 5,000 in front on a state aid street 25% of overlay and 20% of State Aid Streets 37% of the project cost complete population reconstruction program • Exempt Properties and all other uses • Same level of assessment as assessed on front foot basis at Non -State Aid Roads (25/50 %) approximately 45% of the project cost • Area of C/I parcels are 8 converted to equivalent parcel units • Assessed 3 projects in y by dividing area by 10 years — benefited • Calculation made to a• As Listed Above — 50% 18,500 (which • Assessed on a Front Footage Basis • 100% Assessment to properties assessed for determine equivalent aAssessment to All Non- represents minimum • Assessment rate equal to 45% of Commercial cost of sidewalks added number of units and result Residential Properties single family lot size) project costs properties to Wayzata Blvd. is assessed at same dollar • Same assessment rate • No policy on assessing amount as residential applies to the resulting commercial properties E number of parcels U (40 %) • 2 terms and interest a rates available based °, 6 1000 • 10 year Assessment on total cost • 10 year Term 10 year term • 20 year term 20 ° a • Interest Rate =Bond Rate plus p . 5 year with Prime Rate • 7% Interest Rate 6.5% • Interest Rate • None Interest Rate %2 to 1 % • 10 year with Prime F' plus %2% • $3,000 to $8000 based on type: • $3,000 to $5,000 per $3,000 = Reconstruct • $3,200 per assessable parcel assessable parcel y • $5,000 on large lots (assessed $5,000 = Recon/Curb • Inflated by construction cost index • $1,000 to $2000 • No assessment • Based on whether curb and o y ° U a on front footage) &Gutter annually (est. 4 %) gutter is needed or $8,000 = Recon/C &G and reconstruction is needed Storm Sewer �, • $12,000,000 set aside in ° a • Capital Improvement • Capital Improvement 1995 from reserves • Debt Levy for bonds • General Fund Program • Debt Levy — evaluated each year Plan and Reserves Plan - $250,000 from • Today $20,000,000 in o 06 • Progressively Increased from • Use Debt Levy if Levy based on project load • Need to move to Debt Liquor funds and outstanding debt and ao Inception to cover annual P &I Limits imposed • Levy covers annual P& I of new Levy to cover Balance from Property $18,000,000 in reserve • aU of additional annual projects p bond issue increasing costs Taxes fiend ° • Need to move towards debt w levy Special Assessment Comparison Matrix — August 2005 Bloomington Plymouth Golden Valley Fridley Wayzata Maple Grove U •� c 3a • Yes • Yes • Yes • No • No • No ao • None • None • 1 Commercial Challenge - • None • N/A • None a resolved V a a� • Sanitary &Water Improvements paid by • Sanitary & Water • Sanitary/Water Repair and • Water /Sanitary System Improvements • Water and Sanitary y Utility Fund Improvements paid by Reconstruction paid by Utility paid by Utility fund • Water, Sanitary and Improvements paid by y a, y y • Storm Sewer Assessments — Utilit y fund • Storm Sewer Improvements p Funds • Sanitary/Water /Water New • If neighborhood does Storm System Utility Fund only if no previous o —100 /o Assessed for new Construction paid by developer not have adequate Improvements paid by • Storm Sewer Additions assessment (1 -2 %), and upgrade if system is not • Storm Sewer Improvements paid storm sewer, up to Utility Funds assessed like Street improvements paid by Storm adequate by Utility Fund $1,000 /lot is assessed Improvements at 50% Utility Fund to homeowner Road Recon/Mill & Overlay Costs & Levy to support costs: Project Costs: Project Costs: 1999 - $1,362,815 1999 - $1,742,629 2000 - $1,625,027 2000 - $2,345,673 2001 - $2,415,742 2001 - $3,470,257 2002 - $2,333,180 Road Reconstruction Costs 2002 - $1,987,426 2003 - $1,545,550 • 1999 - $250,000 2003 - $3,516,785 2004 - $4,177,596 • 2000 - $200,000 2004 - $3,589,301 2005 - $3,250,000 est. • 2001 - $350,000 c Amount Assessed: Levy 1999 - $1,106,187 • Not provided — debt levies used • 2002 - $650,000 1999 - $470,391 2000 - $1,139,373 to support costs not paid for by • 2003 - $700,000 cc 2000 - $697,434 2001 - $1,240,000 special assessments Information not provided • 2004 - $600,000 Information not provided •� 2001 - $938,620 2002 - $557,694 2002 - $1,240,000 • Bond Issuance Annually based ° w 2003 - $1,112 466 2003 - $1,283,400 2004 - $0 (levy limits — used debt on amount of project cost Funding sources are $250,000 2004 - $1,035,786 levy of $599,222 for bonds) per year from Liquor Fund 2005 - $1,288,700 (reduced by from Storm sewer fund Amounts not assessed picked up by $688,700 if MV Hstd credit doesn't and balance and balance by property tax general obligation debt levy. 29% of get app roved levies costs assessed, 71 % covered by debt levy Costs exceed levies — balance paid by assessments, fund balance, transfers of general fund surplus and other minor contributions E] INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (CONTINUED) Conclusions and Recommendations With costs reportedly near $3,000 to $4,000 per 1/4 -acre If current costs are below the above market value benefit",', property, and $6,000 or more per larger site subdivisions; conclusions, a more aggressive stance could be feasible. , the marginal benefit of curb and gutter greatly diminishes To reduce potential appeals, however, a compromise in the "country" look neighborhoods. Based upon our mar = policy would be to establish a floor assessment amount ket research, South Harriet Park can fully bear the $3,000 somewhat below the above value benefit rates, plus apply to $4,000 curb and gutter costs, Sunnyslope could bear; a certain percentage for the overage. The shortfall would near $2,000 per parcel, and Rolling Green $0 to $1,000. ; have to be covered by' a City contribution funded .via the While this is inverse to the costs, the- market appears to, ` " general tax levy. prefer. the no curb "county look in the large -site estate - type suburban developments. While.this conclusion is not Unique floor amounts would be appropriate for the di fete fully consistent with all of our market research, the majority ent types and valued subdivisions (see the, notable value of data supports this opinion, benefit differences between South Harriet Park and Roll- !rig Green). With new street improvements net of consideration of the curb and gutter issue, the market appears to fully bear the If curb and gutter are to be included in some large4ot de- cost when the original improvements are in poor condi- velopments where a "country" look is preferred, greater bon. Costs reportedly are in the $4,000 to $10,000 range care should be used in establishing the floor amount. depending upon size of the lots. When the pavement has some remaining .life where significant annual patching is Please, review the "extraordinary assumptions, special not needed, a proration of the new pavement cost would limiting conditions, and hypothetical conditions" section of be appropriate. All of the subject neighborhoods' streets this report on page 11 before relying on the values, recom= appear to be at the end of their useful life. mendations or other conclusions II f esearch and anal - sis we conclude Based upon a o our r y , . the following market value benefits for the subject 3 neigh- borhoods: South Harriet Park With Curb and Gutter: $9,000 to $10,000 (1.8% to 2.0% on a $500,000 residence) Sunnyslope With Curb and Gutter: $12,000 to $14,000 (1.6% to 1.9% on a $750,000 residence) Sunnyslope Without Curb and Gutter: $10,000 to $12,000 (1.3% to 1.6% on a $750,000 residence) Rolling Green Without Curb and Gutter: $14,000 to $16,000 (.9% to 1.1% on a $1.5 million residence) Note that these are average values where there may be some exceptions - -small /modest homes on poor- feature lots may be less, and larger than average sites with strong values commanding site premiums would be greater. City ,assessment policy may varying from a conservative across the board low percentage of cost rate with general taxes funding the balance, to an aggressive near 100% of cost rate where property owner appeals would be prob- able on some class of properties. - AGENDA ITEM VI.C. Page 1 of 1 Darlene Wallin From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 7:49 AM To: Darlene Wallin Cc: Eric Anderson Subject: FW: Comment on proposed assessment policy From: AMY VOSE [mailto:amyvose @msn.com] Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2005 9:27 AM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: Comment on proposed assessment policy I will be unable to attend the upcoming Council meeting where the proposed new assessment policy will be discussed. Please forward this message to appropriate staff and Councilmembers. We are new residents and live on a street that is likely to be reconstructed in the near future. We support an increase in utility fees to offset a portion of assessable reconstruction costs. However, I would encourage the City not to assume the cost of curb and gutter. On our street, curb /gutter would be added amenities. Thus, they would plainly provide a special benefit (increased property value) to our property and would be the most defensible portion of the assessment for reconstructing our street. Conversely, replacement of the pavement arguably provides little benefit to our property value since we already enjoy paved access. This portion of the assessment is most vulnerable to appeal. Accordingly, I'd suggest that the City adopt a policy of paying a portion /percentage of the pavement replacement cost in recognition of the marginal benefit provided by this portion of the project while fully assessing for all new amenities such as curb /gutter. These new amenities plainly can be assessed in full. Thanks Bob (and Amy) Vose 5817 Eastview Dr. Edina 952 - 926 -1717 8/15/2005 AGENDA ITEM: VI.C. Darlene Wallin .)m: Jennifer Bennerotte Thursday, August 11, 2005 8:03 AM bent: To: Darlene Wallin Cc: Eric Anderson; Wayne Houle; Robert C. Wilson Subject: FW: New Special Assessment Policy - - - -- original Message---- - From: Jim Grotz [ mailto :jim.grotz@raymondjames.com] Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 1:27 AM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: New Special Assessment Policy Re: new Special Assessment Policy Proposal as proposed in 6 page proposal dated 8 -2 -2005 Please forward to Mayor and City Council, Assessing Department and Engineering Department I have read this 6 page proposal and support its,adoption. I feel the very small increase in the Storm Water Quarterly Charge is a very small price to pay for the benefits. our area has experience serious street erosion because all storm water is discharged to the street as we do not have underground storm sewers. Without the benefits of curb and gutter, there is nothing to stop erosion along the edges of the street. I also support the one R.E.U. policy per lot as proposed. Please pass this Special Assessment Policy Proposal dated 8 -2 -2005. James Grotz 5513 Park Place Edina, MN 55424 Tel # 952- 925 -5150 1 Page 1 of 1 Darlene Wallin From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 8:12 AM To: Darlene Wallin Cc: Eric Anderson Subject: FW: Assessments policy From: Mark Kuck [mailto:markkuck @msn.com] Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 9:06 PM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: Assessments policy Dear City Council, I am writing to voice my view regarding the pending vote on the assessments policy. It is not clear why the existing policy should be changed. I support any changes geared towards alleviating hardships on the elderly or financially impaired. However, I do not support funding improvements to other persons' properties, when those homeowners are financially able to pay for the improvements. One hundred percent of the value of the improvement is for the benefit of the affected property. I believe that the party who benefits from the improvement should pay for it. Regards, Mark Kuck 8/16/2005 Curb & Gutter assessments Tue, Aug 16, 2005 2:23 PM To: edinamai1@cAbdina.mn.us Subject: Curb PGutter assessments ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- Please route to: Eric Anderson Steven tillehaug Scott Housh This is a letter of protest against the proposed change in Edina's assessments for curb and gutter construction, as outlined in the Edina Sun - Current, dated Aug 4 and 11. * The newspaper headline of "Increased utility rates..." to pay for curb /gutter improvements can be mislinterpreted. In a telecon Thursday last, Mr. Anderson calmed me down a bit and said that this refers to sewer water runoff, not an electric bill increase. * We object to the proposed tax to be levied on those of us who have, in years past, been assessed for curb and gutter improvements and paid for same over a 10 year period; these improvements were considered to "add value to our property', or some such tax lawyerese. Edina residents outside our immediate Morningside taxing district were not assessed to pay for our curb /gutter. We fail to see the morality of a tax (oh, yeah, utility user fee) which we're to pay to finance a gutter project in another part of the city. Yes, the City Council has the power to declare this action legal, but does that make it right ? * Assuming you pass this onerous (for those who've already paid) assessment, is the increase going to be deductible for income tax purposes ? After all, our monies will be extracted for the benefit of residents of Sunnyslopes or Interlachen or somewhere else. No value will be added to our property for our expenses. Regards Raymond and Kathleen Hall 4230 Grimes Ave. -S. Edina MN 55416 Pape 1 of 2 91NA, l e 0 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND .COUNCIL From: DEB MANGEN , CITY CLERK Date: AUGUST 16, 2005 Subject: RESOLUTION NO. 2005-69 ❑ NOMINATING ROBERT J. To HRA KOJETIN FOR REAPPOINT- ® MENT TO NINE MILE To Council CREEK WATERSHED ❑ BOARD Agenda Item IV.D. Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ° ® To Council ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion RECOMMENDATION: Approve Robert J. Kojetin for re- appointment to the Nine Mile Creek Watershed Board. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached is a request from Robert J. Kojetin, dated August 15, 2005, asking for your consideration in endorsing his re- appointment to the. Nine Mile Creek Watershed Board. DI August 15, 2005 Edina City Council 4801 West 50'' Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Sir or Madam: I am applying for re- appointment to the Nine -Mile Creek Watershed Board and I would like your endorsement to be submitted to the Hennepin County Commissioners. I have enjoyed the past nine years that I have served on the Nine -Mile Creek Watershed Board. Assignments that I have held on the Board are: 1. Two years on'the Citizens Advisory Committee; and 2. Nine years as Manager o Working towards the Watershed District goals of maintaining the quality of its water as well as the environment remains one of my priorities. Thanks you for considering my- appointment to the Nine -Mile Creek Watershed Board. Robert J. Koje�ji l RJK/dw A,� ow e \�roRF0F',5 • 11368 REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor and City Council From: Solvei Wilmot, Assistant Sanitarian Health Department Date: August 16, 2005 Subject: Renewal of Refuse and Recycling Collection Contract for Municipal Facilities. i RECOMMENDATION: Agenda Item # VI.E Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action M, Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Extend Waste Management's contract for refuse and recycling collection at City facilities through 2006. , INFO /BACKGROUND: In 2003, bids for collection of refuse and recycling from municipal facilities were taken. Waste Management was the low bidder and awarded the contract. The contract was for two years, 2004 and 2005, with an option for a one year renewal contingent upon City Council approval. The contract for 2006 would continue to provide refuse and recycling collection for the municipal facilities: Braemar Golf Course, Braemar Arena, Braemar Golf Dome, Courtney Fields, Edina Liquor Stores, Fred Richards Golf Course, City Hall, Public Works, Fire Stations, Edina Art Center, Van'Valkenburg Ball Fields, Edina Aquatic Center, and Kenneth Rosland Park. The annual cost will be the same as the past two years at approximately $24,000. This option is only available for one year. A bid will be required for a 2007 contract. O REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Boyd Tate Traffic Safety Coordinator Date: August 16, 2005 Subject: Traffic Safety Staff Review for August 2, 2005 Recommendation: Agenda Item # VI. F Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Review and approve Traffic Safety Staff Review of Tuesday, August 2, 2005. Info /Background: It is not anticipated that residents will be in attendance at the Council meeting regarding the attached issues. G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Advisory Committee \Staff Review Summaries \05 TS AG & Min \Copy of rr 3-15 - 05.doc 0 TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW Tuesday, August 2, 2005 The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on August 2, 2005. Staff present included the City Engineer, Traffic Engineer, Traffic S_ afety Coordinator, City Planner, Sign Coordinator, and Chief of Police. From that review, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They have also been informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included, on the August 16, 2005 Council Agenda. SECTION A: Requests on which staff recommends approval: 1. Request for "No Parking" signs to be placed on the north side of West 72nd Street just west of France Avenue. Staff received this request from two different citizens. One is a resident on Dunham Drive and the other is a resident on Bristol Circle. West 72nd Street is a 30 -foot wide local street west of France Avenue. A traffic survey was completed on 10/12/04 with a Monday- Friday Average Daily Traffic Count of 1,460. The 85th percentile speed is 27.3 mph. Parking is currently allowed on the north side and the south side of West 72nd Street has "No Parking Anytime" signs posted. France Avenue is an "A" Minor Arterial — Reliever and a County Road. There have been 9 reported property damage accidents and 1 personal injury accident at this intersection within the past 5 years. The northwest corner of this intersection houses a multi -use commercial building with a large parking lot for employees and clients. The southwest corner of this intersection houses a multifamily complex with adequate of off - street parking. There is an existing Stop sign for westbound West 72nd Street at France Avenue. Requestors state that some cars are parked all day leaving them to believe that they are employees working in the commercial building. Requestors state that cars parked on the north side of West 72nd Street narrow the driving lanes in both directions. Westbound vehicles, stopped at the intersection cause additional narrowing. Vehicles-turning onto West 72 "d_ Street from France are not able to get through causing traffic to back up on France Avenue. Cars must wait until the westbound traffic clears the intersection before proceeding onto West 72nd Street. Traffic Safety Staff Review August 2, 2005 Page 1 of 2 Staff has reviewed this intersection and concurs that a traffic safety issue exists. north side of West 72 "" Street from France Avenue to the parking lot drive -way of the commercial building. SECTION B: Requests that staff recommends denial of request: Request to install a Pedestrian Crosswalk across Gleason Road at the south side of McCauley Trail West. Requestor is a resident on Timber Ridge and is concerned with the safety of her children who cross Gleason Road at this location. A school advance warning sign currently exists on the north side of McCauley Trail West at Gleason Road. This is a 'Warning sign" to alert motorists of the school zone adjacent to the Creek Valley School. McCauley Trail West is a 36 -foot wide local street with no curb and gutter or sidewalks. There is no traffic data on McCauley Trail West. Gleason Road is a 44 foot wide "B" Minor Arterial street with curb and gutter and a side walk on the east side. A traffic study conducted in April of 2005 shows a Monday- Friday average daily traffic count of 8,105 with an 85th percentile speed of 34.5 m.p.h.. There have been no reported pedestrian accidents at this intersection within the past 5 years. City Policy guides where Pedestrian Crosswalks are to be placed and this intersection does not meet warrants for a crosswalk. However, staff is recommending that the school advance warning -sign be relocated so as to not give the false sense that a crosswalk exists at this intersection and that a pedestrian ramp be cut into the curb on the East side of Gleason Road to accommodate the pedestrians that access the sidewalk from McCauley Trail. Staff recommends denial of the request for a pedestrian crosswalk at Gleason Road and McCauley Trail West. SECTION C: Requests that are deferred to a later date or referred to others: None for the August 2, 2005 meeting. Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 2 of 2 August 2, 2005 F 8/2/2005 1314.6520 101458 ADVANCED STATE SECURITY STREET RENOVATION 116970 1,002.93 CAMERA REPAIR CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 1.002.93 4118970 CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 102626 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES 4118748 1314.6520 987.42 READY MIX 116973 4118472 317.53 i READY MIX STREET RENOVATION Council Check Register 893.38 READY MIX CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 846.36 7/29/2005 -814/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 274904 8/212005 I 1269.54 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY COMMUNICATIONS 117313 6,336.09 2210.6711 274909 48.68 117037 456636 5822.5515 382.40 a 133.86 117038 456637 5842.5515 274910 8/212005 44.12 117039 456797 5842.5515 302.76 TRAINING MANUAUCD 46.12 117040 456796 5822.5515 843.78 29.56 274911 117257 457101 5862.5515 125.80 117258 456640 5862.5515 71.40 117259 460142 5862.5515 499.54 274905 8/2/2005 100616 ACTION MAILING SERVICES INC. 288.48 MAIL PROCESS 117066 104416 5910.6103 288.48 274906 8/2/2005 I 102191 ADVANCED GRAPHIC SYSTEMS INC. 498.15 TONER CARTRIDGES 116968 INV00062456 1550.6406 498.15 274907 8/2/2005 1314.6520 101458 ADVANCED STATE SECURITY STREET RENOVATION 116970 1,002.93 CAMERA REPAIR CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 1.002.93 4118970 274908 8/2/2005 STREET RENOVATION 102626 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES 4118748 1314.6520 987.42 READY MIX 116973 4118472 317.53 i READY MIX STREET RENOVATION 117091 893.38 READY MIX CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 846.36 READY MIX 1314.6520 CONCRETE 893.38 READY MIX 67089 7411.6103 1128.48 READY MIX 117094 INV61694 I 1269.54 READY MIX COMMUNICATIONS 117313 6,336.09 2210.6711 274909 8/2/2005 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 382.40 a EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 382.40 274910 8/212005 103357 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO 302.76 TRAINING MANUAUCD 541.02 MICROPHONES 843.78 274911 8/2/2005 101506 AMERICAN HOTEL REGISTER CO. Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/2/2005 14:04:48 Page- 1 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING GENERAL (BILLING) CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 117125 25416 5410.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION 116969 4118205 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 116970 4117C-,n 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 116971 4118970 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 116972 4118748 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 116973 4118472 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 117091 4119412 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 117092 4119199 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 117093 67089 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 117094 INV61694 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 117313 INV61719 2210.6711 NEW EQUIPMENT COMMUNICATIONS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/212005 14:04:48 Council Check Register Page - 2 7/29/2005 - 8/4/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 402.04 CHANGING STATION, CURTAIN 117341 4423543 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 402.04 274912 81212005 100630 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC. 191.41 COPIER PAPER 117126 10014355 -00 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 191.41 274913 81212005 102109 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER 401.96 2 -WAY RADIO REPAIRS 117312 64827 1553.6237 RADIO SERVICE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 401.96 274914 81212005 102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE 852.13 FOOD 117127 421345 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD. GRILL 12.75- CREDIT 117128 419034 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 839.38 274915 8/212005 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. 179.85 CAL HYPO 117342 27144 5620.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH PARK 63.90 STAINLESS CLEANER 117343 27140 5620.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH PARK 243.75 274916 812/2005 118061 ARAMARK UNIFORM 50.56 UNIFORM PURCHASE 117095 57700800 -1 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 50.56 274917 812/2005 104433 ARENS, TONY 85.00 FEFUND TENNIS CAMP - ALLIE 117358 REFUND TENNIS 1600.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM PARK ADMIN. GENERAL CAMP 85.00 274918 8/212005 101954 AUGIE'S INC. 64.36 FOOD 117129 23276 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 64.36 274919 81212005 116418 AUNCO POTTERY 327.80 PLANTER 117067 5052 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 327.80 274920 81212005 100642 BANNERS TO GO 438.70 PARADE BANNERS 117314 19947 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 438.70 y , ., R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/212005 14:04:48 Council Check Register Page - 3 7/29/2005 --814/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 274921 81212005 104345 BARCLAY AUDIO 125.00 SOUND SYSTEM REPAIRS 117344 032105 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 798.74 SOUND MIXER 117345 040405 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 923.74 274922 81212005 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 111.00 117041 33982200 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 64.00 117042 40269400 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 354.00 117043 33982300 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 258.79 117260 40259600 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING _ 237.24 117261 40297400 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX _ VERNON SELLING 24.00 117262 40259700 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 49.54 117263 40297500 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 86.95 117264 34047400 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING _ 1,185.52 274923 81212005 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 88.42 OFFICE SUPPLIES 116974 4057420 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 129.66 OFFICE SUPPLIES 116974 4057420 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 88.46 CASSETTES, INKJET 116975 4055980 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 20.39- RETURN 116976 CM4009930 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2.81- RETURN 116977 CM3995740 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 283.34 274924 802005 100711 BLOOD, DAVID 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 117059 080405 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 274925 8/212005 103879 BLOOMINGTON RENTAL CENTER 51.50 ELECTRIC HAMMER RENTAL 117346 20559 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 51.50 274926 812/2005 100663 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 15.96 PETTY CASH 117315 072905 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE 21.29 PETTY CASH 117315 072905 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 37.00 PETTY CASH 117315 072905 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 46.74 PETTY CASH 117315 072905 5422.6275 COURSE BEAUTIFICATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 51.35 PETTY CASH 117315 072905 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 74.00 PETTY CASH 117315 072905 5410.6235 POSTAGE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 75.00 PETTY CASH 117315 072905 5410.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 107.07 PETTY CASH 117315 072905 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 428.41 CITY OF EDINA 8/2/2005 14:04:48 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 4 7129/2005 -- 8/412005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 274927 812/2005 103254 BRO -TEX INC. 452.63 SORBENTS 116978 315092 1280.6271 HAZ. WASTE DISPOSAL SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 452.63 274928 81212005 100669 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC. 436.13 BALLFIELD AGLIME 117068 071505 1642.6542 INFIELD MIXTURE FIELD MAINTENANCE 436.13 274929 81212005 118571 BURNS, DAWNA 5.49 SEASON TICKET REFUND 117130 072705 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 84.51 SEASON TICKET REFUND 117130 072705 5301.4532 SEASON TICKETS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 90.00 274930 812/2005 100776 BUTLER, GEORGE 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 117058 080405 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 274931 81212005 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 483.62 MERCHANDISE 117131 906797095 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 862.40 MERCHANDISE 117132 906821281 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 123.31 MERCHANDISE 117133 906807677 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,469.33 274932 8/212005 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 96.00 117199 41432 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 96.00 274933 8/212005 100681 CATCO 261.86 DRYER CARTRIDGES, VALVE KITS 116979 3 -80622 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 261.86 274934 8/2/2005 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 18.90. 117316 JULY20 7413.6582 FUEL OIL PSTF FIRE TOWER 18.90 274935 81212005 100256 CINGULAR WIRELESS 23.25 117134 071705 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 23.25 274936 81212005 102123 CIT GROUP /COMMERCIAL SERVICES, ',148.93 MERCHANDISE 117135 317624 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS -PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES T 7T l R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 274937 8/212005 274938 81212005 274939 81212005 274940 81212005 274941 81212005 274942 8/2/2005 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7129/2005 --8/412005 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1,148.93 REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS SAFETY EQUIPMENT SAFETY EQUIPMENT SAFETY EQUIPMENT SAFETY EQUIPMENT SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD CRAFT SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 8/2/2005 14:04:48 Page - 5 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BUILDING MAINTENANCE ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD 101223 CITIES FORD COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD 298.72 ALTERNATOR ASSEMBLY 116980 118417WFOW 1553.6530 138.50 AIR CONTROL 116981 118471WFOW 1553.6530 298.72 ALTERNATOR ASSEMBLY 116982 118419WFOW 1553.6530 79.88- CREDIT 116983 CM118419WFOW 1553.6530 656.06 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 122.50 PROTECTIVE OVERALLS 116984 02618871 1301.6610 94.16 EARPLUGS, GLOVES, GLASSES 116985 02620507 1301.6610 3.68 SAFETY GLASSES 117096 02623717 1553.6610 63.79 SAFETY GLASSES 117096 02623717 1646.6610 56.16 GLOVES 117097 02623331 1553.6610 78.24 GLOVES, SAFETY GLASSES 117098 02623245 1646.6406 418.53 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 57.99 SPONGES 117099 INV000014310 5120.5510 157.48 CLAY 117100 INV000014200 5110.6564 350.59 CLAY 117100 INV000014200 5120.5510 566.06 104948 CONTINENTAL RESEARCH CORPORATI 401.02 DEGREASER 116986 228198 -CRC -1 1553.6406 401.02 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING 940.80 117044 322680 5822.5514 461.00 117200 323342 5842.5513 19.80 117201 323808 5842.5515 1,431.37 117202 323807 5842.5514 1,046.35 117265 323805 5822.5514 19.80 117266 323806 5822.5515 3,919.12 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 36.73 BAKERY 117136 196722 5421.5510 81.51 BAKERY 117137 196721 5421.5510 54.29 BAKERY 117138 196769 5421.5510 63.49 BAKERY 117139 196907 5421.5510 REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS SAFETY EQUIPMENT SAFETY EQUIPMENT SAFETY EQUIPMENT SAFETY EQUIPMENT SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD CRAFT SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 8/2/2005 14:04:48 Page - 5 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BUILDING MAINTENANCE ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/2/2005 14:04:48 Council Check Register Page - 6 7/2912005 -8/4/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 33.50 BAKERY 117317 196990 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 269.52 274943 81212005 102712 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION 31.70 GREENHOUSE 117069 W05060560 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 47.55 HISTORICAL 117069 W05060560 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 47.55 ARNESON 117069 W05060560 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 63.40 117069 W05060560 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 74.79 117069 W05060560 5210.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF DOME PROGRAM 79.25 CARD ACCESS -PARKS 117069 W05060560 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 79.25 117069 W05060560 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 79.64 117069 W05060560 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 95.19 117069 W05060560 1481.6188 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION 101.46 117069 W05060560 5311.6188 TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION 110.55 117069 W05060560 5111.6188 TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 126.80 117069 W05060560 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 174.46 117069 W05060560 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 374.03 117069 W05060560 5610.6188 TELEPHONE ED ADMINISTRATION 1,485.62 - 274944 812/2005 101691 DON BETZEN GOLF SUPPLY CO. 350.00 MERCHANDISE 117140 19804 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 441.40 MERCHANDISE 117141 19822 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 791.40 274945 81212005 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES 963.57 CAUSTIC SODA, CHLORINE 116987 82700975 -05 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 5,103.69 CHEMICALS 116988 82700954 -05 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 6,067.26 274946 8/2/2005 100739 EAGLE WINE 167.98 117203 267225 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 89.75 117204 267832 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 884.35 117267 267224 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,142.08 274947 8/2/2005 100741 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 1,053.30 117045 326797 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 142.50 117142 216294 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 172.00 117143 14445 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 1,870.40 117268 326882 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING ',238.20 CITY OF EDINA 8/2/2005 14:04:48 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 7 7/29/2005 —8/4/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 274948 81212005 100742 ECOLAS PEST ELIMINATION DIVISI 123.54 PEST CONTROL 117347 4841412 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 123.54 274949 812/2005 116627 EDINA COMPETITIVE CHEERLEADERS 3,360.00 CHEER CAMP PROGRAM 117318 072905 1624.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 3,360.00 274950 8/212005 100747 ELSMORE AQUATIC 87.00 LIFEGUARD UNIFORM 117364 5271 5311.6201 LAUNDRY POOL OPERATION 87.00 274951 8/2/2005 105339 ENRGI 173.75 WEBSITE GRAPHICS 117101 3074 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 680.00 WEBSITE DEVELOPMENT 117102 3077 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 853.75 274952 8/212005 118152 EXPRESS PRESS 733.40 PARADE PROGRAMS 117319 10084 1627.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 733.40 274953 8/2/2005 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. - 96.00 117269 325488 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 96.00 274954 81212005 100297 FAST FOTO & DIGITAL 15.23 PHOTO PROCESSING 117103 T2- 207778 2210.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 15.23 274955 812/2005 103600 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. 964.26 TOILETS 117104 536949 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 964.26 274956 8/212005 116492 FINANCE AND COMMERCE 80.00 369700012 117184 072206 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 80.00 274957 8/2/2005 102267 FLAIR FOUNTAINS 83.46 FOUNTAIN PARTS 117105 3620 1647.6530 REPAIR PARTS PATHS & HARD SURFACE 83.46 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/2/2005 14:04:48 Council Check Register Page - 8 7/29/2005 - 814/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 274956 81212005 101475 FOOTJOY 4,386.73 MERCHANDISE 117144 3252772 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 4,386.73 274959 8/212005 113506 GEBO, ROBERT 44.50 OFFICIATING FEE 117320 072905 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 492.76 PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 44.50 274965 8/2/2005 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 194.50 274960 8/212005 194.50 102250 GIFT BOX CORPORATION OF AMERIC 274966 8/2/2005 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 132.45 249.51 GIFT BAGS 117145 11115655 5440.6406 78.83 117206 249.51 11.90 117207 262602 2,499.52 274961 8/2/2005 6.60- 103316 GOETSCH, SAM L. 671702 15.40- 117210 671703 480.00 INTERPRETER 117321 072405 4078.6103 480.00 274962 81212005 100781 GRAFIX SHOPPE 190.64 APPLY GRAPHICS 117106 42351 1553.6180 190.64 274963 812/2005 118573 GRAFT, MIKE 60.00 1:1 FACILITATOR 117322 072905 1629.6103 60.00 274964 8/2/2005 101103 GRAINGER 183.07 PUNCH 116989 495- 306056 -5 5923.6406 149.52 HAND TOOLS, FILTERS 116990 495- 518871 -1 5913.6406 16017 PAINT BATTERIES 116991 495 - 628083 -0 1553.6585 492.76 PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 274965 8/2/2005 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 194.50 117046 74242 194.50 274966 8/2/2005 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 132.45 117047 266028 115,34 117205 267638 78.83 117206 267182 11.90 117207 262602 2,499.52 117208 262964 6.60- 117209 671702 15.40- 117210 671703 5822.5513 5822.5512 5842.5515 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5512 GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INCLUSION PROGRAM CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES ACCESSORIES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COLLECTION SYSTEMS DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/212005 14:04:48 Council Check Register Page - 9 7/29/2005 -814/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 25.00- 117211 671704 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR - YORK SELLING 8.60- 117212 671705 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 20.19- 117213 670785 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 78.34- 117214 671263 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 186.90- 117215 671262 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4.96- 117216 671013 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 96.00- 117217 671695 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 58.95- 117218 671665 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,911.65 117270 267223 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,787.35 117271 267637 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 64.95 117272 264177 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 104.70 117273 264178 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 29.40- 117274 671664 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 10,176.35 274967 81212005 100791 HALLMAN OIL COMPANY 92.66 WASTE OIL CONTAINERS 116992 157404 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 92.66 274968 8/2/2005 102301 HARTLAND FUEL PRODUCTS LLC 12,685.89 GAS 117185 674333 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 12,685.89 274969 8/212005 100799 HEDBERG AGGREGATES 27.70 MEMORIAL STONE 117146 361230 5400.2072 MEN'S, CLUB GOLF BALANCE SHEET 27.70 274970 8/2/2005 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 205.44 MEAT PATTIES 117147 018510 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 205.44 274971 81212005 101215 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFF1 936.88 JUNE 2005 BOOKING FEES 116993 671 1195.6170 COURT CHARGES LEGAL SERVICES 936.88 274972 8/212005 106371 HENNEPIN FACULTY ASSOCIATES 2,265.17 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES 117065 080405 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,265.17 274973 81212005 116640 HERITAGE CROSS APPAREL 737.78 MERCHANDISE 117148 20974 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 80.48 MERCHANDISE 117149 20948 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES R55CKREG LOG20000 326.84 CITY OF EDINA 8/2/2005 14:04:48 8/2/2005 112628 ICEE COMPANY, THE Council Check Register Page - 10 CONCESSION PRODUCT 116995 425994 7/29/2005 -8/4/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit CUSTOM PATCH TATTOOS 116996 818.26 160.00 274974 8/2/2005 100805 HIRSHFIELD'S 185.31 PVC PIPE 116997 113.19 SEALER, ROLLERS, LINER 116994 003996203 5913.6532 PAINT DISTRIBUTION 274982 812/2005 42.86 PAINT 117348 003996563 5620.6532 PAINT EDINBOROUGH PARK 117323 072805 68.86 PAINT 117349 003996725 5620.6532 PAINT EDINBOROUGH PARK 50.51 STAIN 117350 032178861 5620.6532 PAINT EDINBOROUGH PARK 275.42 274975 8/212005 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURI 463.28 PAINT 117070 68339 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE_ 463.28 274976 8/2/2005 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,003.70 117219 365076 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 427.50 117275 365095 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 581.75 117276 365094 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2.012.95 274977 812/2005 102114 HUEBSCH 101.93 TOWEL & RUG CLEANING 117351 278476 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 101.93 274978 8/212005 101426 HUGHES, GORDON 326.84 JULY MILEAGE EXPENSES 117365 MILEAGE - JULY 1120.6107 5320.5510 1400.6406 5911.6406 5300.2039 5301.4541 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION POOL CONCESSIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET GENERAL ADMISSIONS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 326.84 274979 8/2/2005 112628 ICEE COMPANY, THE 57.00 CONCESSION PRODUCT 116995 425994 57.00 274980 8/212005 117432 IMPERIAL SCOTT SPECIALTIES INC 160.00 CUSTOM PATCH TATTOOS 116996 13215 160.00 274981 8/212005 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 185.31 PVC PIPE 116997 398534 185.31 274982 812/2005 118510 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT #2 .42 DAILY ADMISSION REFUND 117323 072805 6.58 DAILY ADMISSION REFUND 117323 072805 5320.5510 1400.6406 5911.6406 5300.2039 5301.4541 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION POOL CONCESSIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET GENERAL ADMISSIONS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 274983 81212005 274984 812/2005 274985 8/212005 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/29/2005 -8/4/2005 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 7.00 118572 INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONIC SERVICES 773.95 CENTRAL CLOCKS 117150 736263 773.95 100386 J.R. JOHNSON SUPPLY INC. 272.64 FERTILIZER 117352 90175 272.64 105153 JACKSON LANDSCAPE SUPPLY INC. 426.00 HYDROSEEDING 117107 0146258 426.00 274986 812/2005 101400 JAMES, WILLIAM F 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 117063 080405 100.00 274987 812/2005 100828 JERRY S FOODS 105.74 EDINA ART CENTER 117108 6/10/05 105.74 274989 8/212005 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 2,696.75 117220 1934823 2.85 117221 1934815 2,853.43 117222 1934817 357.55 117223 1934821 67.05 117224 1934813 3,829.26 117225 1934820 .95 117226 1934814 21236.59 117227 1934818 486.30 117228 1934816 8.77- 117229 284817 13.32- 117230 284818 13.57- 117231 284819 4.88- 117232 284823 19,18- 117233 286850 11.33- 117234 286849 13.70- 117235 286851 68.95- 117236 286289 162.95- 117237 286468 72.90- 117238 286467 5422.6611 5620.6540 5932.6180 1419.6102 5110.6564 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5515 5842.5512 5842.5513 5842.5513 5822.5512 5842.5512 5842.5513 Subledger Account Description IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT FERTILIZER CONTRACTED REPAIRS 8/2/2005 14:04:48 Page - 11 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EDINBOROUGH PARK GENERAL STORM SEWER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/2/2005 14:04:48 Council Check Register Page - 12 7/29/2005 - 8/4/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 61.88 117277 1931417 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,347.58 117278 1934827 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 99.95 117279 1934825 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,148.78 117280 1931406 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING .95 117281 1927855 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 215.65 117282 1934807 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 24.95 117283 1934809 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 579.65 117284 1934811 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 607.69 117285 1934808 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 362.60 117286 1934810 5822.5512 -COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 815.68 117287 1934812 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 18,406.54 274990 8/212005 118565 JOHNSON, JEANETTE 74.98 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 117109 072705 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 74.98 274991 8/212005 118563 JUMANO COMPANIES 496.90 HYDRANT USE REFUND 117071 072205 5901.4626 SALE OF WATER UTILITY: REVENUES 496.90 274992 81212005 103449 KAMPA, TINA 66.88 PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES 117072 072505 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 183.87 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 117324 072905 1624.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLAYGROUND & THEATER 41.71 PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES 117325 JUL29 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 292.46 274993 8/212005 111018 KEEPRS INC. 236.25 POLO SHIRTS 116998 39618 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 236.25 274994 81212005 118397 KLEIN UNDERGROUND LLC 2,351.00 DUMPTRAILER, COMPRESSOR 117186 21665 1301.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 2,351.00 274995 8/212005 118561 KNUTSON, JULIE 36.00 PARKING PERMIT REFUND 117073 072505 4090.4751 PARKING PERMITS STREET REVOLVING 36.00 274996 8/212005 100846 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO 1,270.90 117048 442292 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 572.00 117049 442051 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/2/2005 14:04:48 Council Check Register Page - 13 7/29/2005 -8/4/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description us ness ni 36.00 117050 442050 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 284.90 117288 442898 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 17.00 117289 442899 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 2,180.80 274997 81212005 117189 L & R SUBURBAN LANDSCAPING 1,050.00 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 116999 072205 04287.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS STORM SEWER CONCORD & SCHOOL 1,050.00 274998 8/212005 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 104.67 NUTS, SCREWS, FITTINGS 117000 3429507 1325.6406 GENERAL_ SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS _ 104.67 274999 8/212005 103396 LENT, WILLIAM 680.24 CLASS SUPPLIES 117001 072205 1600.4390.21 FIREARM SAFETY TRAINING PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 680.24 275000 81212005 100855 LESCO INC. 85.42 GRASS SEED 117187 12653610 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 85.42 275001 8/2/2005 100858 LOGIS 31.00 117110 25755 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,178.00 117110 25755 2210.6160 DATA PROCESSING COMMUNICATIONS 2,242.00 117110 25755 1120.6160 DATA PROCESSING ADMINISTRATION 2,355.00 117110 25755 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING INSPECTIONS 2,484.00 117110 25755 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 3,956.00 117110 25755 5910.6160 DATA PROCESSING GENERAL (BILLING) 4,644.00 117110 25755 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 5,482.00 117110 25755 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 22,372.00 275002 8/212005 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 810.54 CANDY 117002 183995 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 699.62 117290 184094 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,510.16 275003 8/212005 100864 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. 39.94 END PLATE 117003 2054928 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 446.75 SWIVEL JOINT, SOLENOID VALVE 117111 2054995 5920.6530 REPAIR PARTS SEWER CLEANING 486.69 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/2/2005 14:04:48 Council Check Register Page - 14 7/29/2005 -8/4/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 275004 8/2/2005 117804 MALLOY MONTAGUE KARNOWSKI 400.00 2004 AUDIT 117074 15834 5110.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 500.00 2004 AUDIT 117074 15834 5210.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 500.00 2004 AUDIT 117074 15834 5310.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT POOL ADMINISTRATION 1,500.00 2004 AUDIT 117074 15834 5510.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT ARENA ADMINISTRATION 1,500.00 2004 AUDIT 117074 15834 5610.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT ED ADMINISTRATION 2,000.00 2004 AUDIT 117074 15834 4502.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT FAIRVIEW FEE 2,000.00 2004 AUDIT 117074 15834 5410.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT GOLF ADMINISTRATION 2,400.00 2004 AUDIT 117074 15834 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 4,000.00 2004 AUDIT 117074 15834 1160.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT FINANCE 14,800.00 275005 81212005 100868 MARK VII SALES 3,479.00 117051 825066 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,527.90 117052 824592 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 49.00 117053 824914 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 17.60 117054 824593 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 21.95 117055 825067 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,180.05 117291 824829 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,175.10 117292 827337 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 9,450.60 275006 81212005 111825 MCGUIRE MECHANICAL SERVICES IN 895.00 TOILET REPAIR/HTG REPAIR 117075 2600 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 895.00 275007 8/212005 101483 MENARDS 138.52 LUMBER, SCREWS 117004 43893 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 161.87 MOWER, BLADES 117005 44270 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 132.26 CONCRETE CRACK SEALER 117076 44173 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 31.93 CLAMPS, BATTERIES 117112 44828 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 170.28 BRIDGE LUMBER 117151 43989 5422.6577 LUMBER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 44.63 TIMBERS 117152 44032 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 30.38 LIGHT, HINGES 117153 42189 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 709.87 275008 812/2005 101987 MENARDS 131.72 MIRACLE GROW /ROUND UP 117353 9970 5620.6540 FERTILIZER EDINBOROUGH PARK 106.46 ROUTER & BITS 117354 7917 5620.6556 TOOLS EDINBOROUGH PARK 62.96 PAINT & TILE SUPPLIES 117355 9914 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 120.57 DOORSTOPS, HOOKS, TOOLS 117356 11318 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 120.05 WIRING, BRUSHES, PLIERS 117357 11843 - 520.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/29/2005 -814/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIGHT & POWER GENERAL SUPPLIES GASOLINE GASOLINE GASOLINE GASOLINE CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD 8/2/2005 14:04:48 Page - 15 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE GRILL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING SPECIAL ACTIVITIES DISTRIBUTION CITY HALL GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION CENTENNIAL LAKES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 541.76 275009 8/2/2005 100882 MERIT SUPPLY 584.79 CLEANING SUPPLIES 117077 67372 1646.6406 308.10 GRILL CLEANER, WINDEX 117154 67429 5421.6511 169.34 PUNCH DEGREASER, SILICONE 117188 67396 1470.6406 303.63 PUNCH DEGREASER, SILICONE 117188 67396 1553.6406 1,365.86 275010 81212005 100692 MIDWEST COCA -COLA EAGAN 167.70 117056 80680056 5822.5515 469.85 117057 80396209 5842.5515 588.80 117293 80680197 5862.5515 1,226.35 275011 8/2/2005 118429 MIDWEST FLOAT RENTAL 692.25 PARADE FLOAT RENTAL 117326 JUL 4 1627.6103 692.25 275012 8/212005 103186 MIDWEST FUELS 317.90 GENERATOR FUEL 117006 2164 5913.6185 877.89 GENERATOR FUEL 117006 2164 1551.6406 460.26 DIESEL 117155 27423 5422.6581 524.97 GAS 117156 27424 5422.6581 1,075.99 GAS, DIESEL 117157 27350 5422.6581 1,040.15 GAS 117158 27395 5422.6581 4,297.16 275013 8/2/2005 100913 MINNEAPOLIS SUBURBAN SEWER &W 1,360.00 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 117007 32704 5913.6180 11360.00 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 117008 32708 5913.6180 850.00 DUG FOR STOP BOX 117009 32707 5913.6180 1,360.00 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 117010 32705 5913.6180 4,930.00 275014 8/2/2005 102770 MINNESOTA CASTERS INC. 179.81 CASTERS 117327 INV25577 5630.6530 3.06- CREDIT 117328 CREDIT00088 1553.6406 176.75 275015 8/212005 102014 MINNESOTA CLAY USA 98.45 UNDERGLAZE 117113 38034 5120.5510 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIGHT & POWER GENERAL SUPPLIES GASOLINE GASOLINE GASOLINE GASOLINE CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD 8/2/2005 14:04:48 Page - 15 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE GRILL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING SPECIAL ACTIVITIES DISTRIBUTION CITY HALL GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION CENTENNIAL LAKES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/29/2005 -8/4/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 98.45 275016 812/2005 104179 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENU 377.88 CIGARETTE FEE 117361 FS02597 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 535.67 CIGARETTE FEE 117362 FS02605 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 621.09 CIGARETTE FEE 117363 FS02623 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 1,534.64 275017 81212005 101537 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AG 400.00 STORMWATER PERMIT 117189 072705 01328.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 400.00 275018 8/212005 118066 MINNESOTA REVENUE 198.00 HAZARDOUS WASTE FEE 117159 55 -0002236 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 198.00 275019 81212005 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. 63.90 ASPHALT EMULSION 117190 48441 1301.6519 -ROAD OIL 63.90 275020 8/2/2005 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER 166.94 PUMP 117329 0065570 -IN 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS 166.94 - 275021 8/2/2005 100898 MINVALCO 63.22 RELAY OVERLOAD, ACCESS VALVE 117114 499859 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS 63.22 275022 8/212005 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 40.19 THERMOSTAT 117160 476571 -01 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 114.14 SERVICE ASSEMBLY 117161 477148 -02 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT 154.33 275023 81212005 101108 NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE 65.34 DEVELOPER, BRUSH 117115 0720501DPJW 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 65.34 275024 812/2005 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 8/2/2005 14:04:48 Page - 16 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 58TH - CONCORD TO WOODDALE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES CENT SVC PW BUILDING MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 989.00 117239 32409 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 7no nn 117294 32408 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,698.00 CITY OF EDINA 01"ZWa l-".- R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 17 7/29/2005 -8/4/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 275025 8/212005 100724 NISSEN, DICK 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 117062 080405 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 275026 8/212005 117830 NORTHLAND BUSINESS SYSTEMS 3,195.00 DIGITAL RECORDERS 117011 65737 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 3,195.00 275027 81212005 106410 NORTHWEST ATHLETIC CLUB 518.76 CORP FEE 117012 10594175 1400.6037 FITNESS REIMBURSEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 518.76 275028 8/2/2005 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY 19.98 SPEEDY CUT BLOCKS 117116 31717600 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 62.75 MARKERS, CHARCOAL 117117 31728000 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 82.73 275029 812/2005 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 19.57 BOOK, PAPER 717162 298955853- 001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION _ 19.57 275030 812/2005 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 85.20 ROPE FOR TREE CREW 117078 347937 1644.6556 TOOLS TREES & MAINTENANCE 85.20 275031 812/2005 100939 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC. 202.48 COOKIES 117163 8892453 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 141.96 COOKIES 117164 9783153 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 344.44 275032 81212005 118187 PARETO- HOLLROCK/SGD GOLF 182.81 MINI GOLF BALLS 117330 207447 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 182.81 275033 8/212005 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 3,012.00 117240 8076746 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 206.00 117241 8076749 -IN 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,094.00 117295 8076742 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4,312.00 275034 81212005 110832 PC2 SOLUTIONS, INC. 3,520.00 CONSULTING FEE 117013 71605004 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 812/2005 14:04:48 Council Check Register Page - 18 7/29/2005 -8/4/2005 Check # Date 275035 812/2005 275036 8/212005 275037 8/2/2005 275038 8/2/2005 275039 81212005 275040 8/2/2005 275041 8/212005 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 960.00 CONSULTING FEE 117014 61805003 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,480.00 COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES Business Unit CENT SERV GEN - MIS RICHARDS GOLF COURSE GRILL CENTENNIAL LAKES K -9 UNIT COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 266.80 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 117165 77104183 5430.5510 1,318.85 50TH ST SELLING 117166 03854158 5421.5510 307.40 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 117331 77104178 5630.5510 1,893.05 105806 PERFORMANCE KENNELS INC. 68.56 DOG FOOD 117015 1438 1438.6406 68.56 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 44.90 117242 2223598 5842.5515 1,530.70 117243 2223596 5842.5513 4,822.99 117244 2223597 5842.5513 142.45- 117245 3321648 5842.5513 2,039.45 117296 2223599 5862.5512 93.55 117297 2223594 5822.5513 94.40 117298 2223593 5822.5515 409.90 117299 2223592 5822.5513 83.80 117300 2223591 5822.5512 8,977.24 100119 PING 215.04 DRIVER 117167 7530256 5440.5511 215.04 106071 PLAYWORKS OF PRIOR LAKE 4.57 DAILY ADMISSION REFUND 117079 072505 5300.2039 70.43 DAILY ADMISSION REFUND 117079 072505 5301.4541 75.00 101110 POLLY NORMAN PHOTOGRAPHY 150.00 ABOUT TOWN PHOTOS 117366 7/29 INVOICE 2210.6123 150.00 100819 POPP TELECOM 191.14 SERVICE CONTRACT 117332 76533 5610.6230 206.22 SERVICE CONTRACT 117333 76532 5610.6230 397.36 COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES Business Unit CENT SERV GEN - MIS RICHARDS GOLF COURSE GRILL CENTENNIAL LAKES K -9 UNIT COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET GENERAL ADMISSIONS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT ED ADMINISTRATION SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT ED ADMINISTRATION CITY OF EDINA 8/212005 14:04:48 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 19 7/29/2005 -8/4/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 275042 81212005 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 209.10 117246 267226 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,627.25 117247 267649 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 278.93 117301 267647 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,115.28 275043 8/2/2005 104669 PURE BLUE 285.00 MERCHANDISE 117168 35600 5310.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL ADMINISTRATION 285.00 275044 8/212005 100971 QUALITY WINE 17,20- 117248 583024 -00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 1,741.05 117248 583024 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 10.94- 117249 583005 -00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 1,107.56 117249 583005 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 92.07- 117250 583236 -00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 4,751.70 117250 583236-00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 43.22- 117302 583301 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 2,176.50 117302 583301 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 67,99- 117303 572406 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 3,399.32 117303 572406 -00 5862.5512 COST Or GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 6.80- 117304 582419 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 892,78 117304 582419 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5,48- 117305 582812 -00 5820.5518 - VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 535.58 117305 582812 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 26.05- 117306 583225 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 1,310.82 117306 583225 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 15,445.76 275045 812/2005 101965 OWEST 112.14 952 920 -8166 117118 8166 -7/05 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 112.14 275046 81212005 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 286.40 REPLACE VALVE 117169 40023 5422.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 286.40 275047 8/2/2005 114489 RICOH CORPORATION 58.50 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 117334 F072500241 -21 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 58.50 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/29/2005 - 8/4/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 275048 81212005 101634 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPANY 34.96 BAKERY 117170 130398 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 34.96 275049 81212005 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 47.06 101- 26373069350 117016 072505 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 69.79 101 - 26373069350 117017 071405 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 18.48 101 - 26373069350 117191 072805 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 135.33 275050 812/2005 105514 SCHIRO, DOUG 65.97 UNIFORM PURCHASE 117192 072705 1646.6201 LAUNDRY 65.97 275051 8/2/2005 116905 SCREENING AND SELECTION SERVIC 38.00 DRUG /ALCOHOL TESTING 117193 828652 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL 38.00 275052 8/212005 101587 SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES 1,342.00 DIAL -A -RIDE JUNE2005 117080 071505 1514.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,000.00 DIAL -A -RIDE JUNE 2005 117183 072805 1514.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,342.00 275053 8/2/2005 104689 SERIGRAPHICS SIGN SYSTEMS INC. 412.95 SIGNS 117018 36888 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 412.95 275054 81212005 100998 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 16.78 YELLOW PAINT 117171 8396 -3 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 16.78 275055 81212005 116235 SIR SPEEDY 532.50 APRIL NEWSLETTERS 117081 15805 2210.6575 PRINTING 532.50 275056 81212005 118034 SLB OF MINNESOTA LLC 144.60 DINNER MEETING 117019 3461575070505 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE 144.60 275057 81212005 118566 SMITH, MONA 713.34 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 117120 072705 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 713.34 8/2/2005 14:04:48 Page • 20 Business Unit GRILL VANVALKENBURG VANVALKENBURG PLAYGROUND & THEATER BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL DIAL -A -RIDE PROGRAM DIAL -A -RIDE PROGRAM POOL OPERATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COMMUNICATIONS CITY COUNCIL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CITY OF EDINA 8/2/2005 14:04:48 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 21 7129/2005 - 8/4/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 275058 8/2/2005 103339 SMITHSHARPE FIRE BRICK SUPPLY 1,331.57 KILN SHELVES 117119 29074 5111.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 1,331.57 275059 8/2/2005 118569 SOUTHDALE YMCA 10.68 DAILY ADMISSION REFUND 117172 072705 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 164.32 DAILY ADMISSION REFUND 117172 072705 5301.4541 GENERAL ADMISSIONS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 175.00 275060 81212005 101002 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS INC 185.25 117173 1C 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 3,182.60 117251 1 t 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 77.50 117252 16 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,787.35 117307 1684. 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 35.95 117308 168479 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5,268.65 275061 812/2005 101004 SPS COMPANIES 604.94 WATER FOUNTAIN 117020 S1252366.001 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 22.02 HANDLES 117082 S1274849.001 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 626.96 275062 8/212005 103283 ST. CROIX RECREATION CO INC 584.72 GROUP GRILL 117021 14386 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 1,227.32 PLASTIC DOME TOPS 117083 14381 1645.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LITTER REMOVAL 1,812.04 275063 812/2005 102786 STOP TECH LTD 90.00 STOP STICK 117022 22693 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 90.00 275064 81212005 101015 STREICHERS 3,942.36 _ SQUAD BUILD -UP 117023 1280181 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 3,942.36 275065 81212005 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 80.00 REPAIRS 117024 CVCB486192 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 80.00 275066 812/2005 102624 SUNDANCE DISTRIBUTION INC. 1,486.08 MULCH 117335 SI.131415 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/29/2005 --8/4/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1,486.08 275067 81212005 100794 SWANSON, HAROLD 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 117061 080405 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 8/2/2005 14:04:48 Page - 22 Business Unit RESERVE PROGRAM GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL CONTRACTED REPAIRS TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL STORM SEWER EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLAYGROUND & THEATER GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL TURF CARE 100.00 275068 812/2005 118157 TESSCO TECHNOLOGIES 132.39 FLANGE ARRESTORS 117084 073966 5915.6406 132.39 275069 8/2/2005 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 413.25 117174 380672 5421.5514 138.00 117175 18557 5421.5514 108.00 117176 18589 5421.5514 659.25 275070 81212005 100540 TIGHT ROPE 4,200.00 CLEAN GLEASON WATERTOWER 117194 200465 5914.6180 4,200.00 275071 81212005 101474 TITLEIST 117.12 MERCHANDISE 117177 2500423 5440.5511 211.77 MERCHANDISE 117178 2487254 5440.5511 328.89 275072 8/212005 101374 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE 8,030.00 CHAIN LINK FENCE 117121 18282 5932.6180 8,030.00 275073 81212005 103982 TRAFFIC CONTROL CORPORATION 293.23 PUSH BUTTONS 117025 0000016849 1330.6215 293.23 275074 8/212005 101042 TRIARCO 27.35 MAGIC TRAN TAPE 117336 489582 1624.6406 27.35 275075 8/2/2005 100682 TRUGREEN- CHEMLAWN 111.83 SHRUB FERTILIZING 117085 289857 1643.6103 101.18 FERTILIZE ISLANDS 117086 283744 1643.6103 106.50 FERTILIZE ISLANDS 117087 283851 1643.6103 319.51 8/2/2005 14:04:48 Page - 22 Business Unit RESERVE PROGRAM GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL CONTRACTED REPAIRS TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL STORM SEWER EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLAYGROUND & THEATER GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL TURF CARE 8/2/2005 14:04:48 Page - 23 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CENT SVC PW BUILDING MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 360.00 7/26,8/18,9/08 117359 CITY OF EDINA 5610.6136 R55CKREG LOG20000 ED ADMINISTRATION PROGRAMS Council Check Register 360.00 7/29/2005 —8/4/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 275076 81212005 101045 TURF SUPPLY COMPANY 985.11 PUNCH UNIT, KNOBS 117026 352106 5923.6406 582.56 CUP CHANGER, CUPS 117179 097801 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 582.56 275081 275077 8/2/2005 101908 US FOODSERVICE INC 101047 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO 381.29 CLAMPS, SPRINGS 117195 240673 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 381.29 1,011.02 CONCESSION PRODUCT 275078 8/2/2005 5320.5510 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. POOL CONCESSIONS 13.75- CREDIT 915.90 SEED MIXTURE 117180 12643 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 915.90 275079 81212005 275082 108536 UNDERWATER ADVENTURES 103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 8/2/2005 14:04:48 Page - 23 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CENT SVC PW BUILDING MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 360.00 7/26,8/18,9/08 117359 CHILDRENS' 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION PROGRAMS 360.00 275080 81212005 101053 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY 985.11 PUNCH UNIT, KNOBS 117026 352106 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 985.11 275081 8/2/2005 101908 US FOODSERVICE INC 106.70 TISSUE 117027 33510521 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 1,011.02 CONCESSION PRODUCT 117027 33510521 5320.5510 - COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 13.75- CREDIT 117028 33505865CR 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 1,103.97 275082 8/2/2005 103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 9,600.00 REPLACE 4 GATE VALVES 117029 9710 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 9,600.00 275083 8/212005 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 123.75 SANITARY SUPPLIES 117337 591946 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 123.75 275084 8/212005 101060 VANTAGE ELECTRIC 2,450.00 REWIRE FUEL PUMPS 117181 18205 5422.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,450.00 275085 8/212005 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 300.00 CART RENTAL 117338 19894 5423.6216 LEASE LINES GOLF CARS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7129/2005 --814/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 750.00 CART LEASE 117339 19513 5423.6216 LEASE LINES 8/2/2005 14:04:48 Page - 24 Business Unit GOLF CARS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 1,050.00 PSTF OCCUPANCY CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE 275086 81212005 AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 312.47 LIGHTING 117030 15019827 -00 7411.6103 83.98 SWITCH 117196 15019827 -01 7411.6103 396.45 275087 81212005 101080 WALSH, WILLIAM 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 117060 080405 1419.6102 100.00 275088 812/2005 118570 WATERTOWN MAYER PUBLIC SCHOOLS 5.12 DAILY ADMISSION REFUND 117182 072705 5300.2039 78.88 DAILY ADMISSION REFUND 117182 072705 5301.4541 84.00 275089 8/2/2005 116354 WEED WRENCH COMPANY, THE 415.00 FORESTRY TOOLS 117088 04 -199 1644.6556 415.00 275090 8/2/2005 103266 WELSH COMPANIES LLC 593.65 AUG MAINTENANCE 117089 080105 5841.6103 593.65 275091 8/2/2005 103196 WHEELER HARDWARE CO 681.34 LOCK REPAIRS 117340 038482 5430.6180 681.34 275092 8/2/2005 105613 WICKLUND, MITZI 60.75 EXPENSES 117360 EXPENSE REPORT 1190.6107 25.00 EXPENSES 117360 EXPENSE REPORT 1190.6104 23.43 EXPENSES 117360 EXPENSE REPORT 1190.6104 109.18. 275093 81212005 114588 WILSON, ROBERT C. 55.00 NAIOP SEMINAR 117197 072705 1190.6104 55.00 275094 812/2005 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 292,80 117253 120492 -00 5842.5513 996.65 117309 120491 -00 5822.5513 8/2/2005 14:04:48 Page - 24 Business Unit GOLF CARS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET GENERAL ADMISSIONS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES TOOLS TREES & MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY CONTRACTED REPAIRS RICHARDS GOLF COURSE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ASSESSING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING CITY OF EDINA 8/212005 14:04:48 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 25 7/29/2005 - 8/4/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,289.45 275095 812/2005 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 744.40 117254 130588 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 658.65- 117255 25221 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,399.20 117310 130587 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,484.95 275096 81212005 112954 WISCONSIN TURF EQUIPMENT CORP. 3.84 BOLTS 117122 516870 -000 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3.84 275097 8/212005 116643 WOODLAND STOVES & FIREPLACES 76.98 PART 117123 10892 5111.6530 REPAIR PARTS ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 76.98 275098 81212005 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 985.00 117256 167048 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 145.00 117311 167179 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,130.00 275099 8/212005 101087 WROBLESKI, HENRY 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 117064 080405 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 275100 8/2/2005 101726 XCEL ENERGY 293.75 51- 4197645 -8 117031 35055616 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 14,002.86 51- 6644819 -9 117032 35124813 5620.6185 LIGHT & POWER EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,634.79 51- 5107681 -4 117033 35075590 5111.6185 LIGHT & POWER ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 1,044.11 51- 6223269 -1 117034 35109660 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 31138.19 51- 5005454 -3 117035 35070474 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 54.83 51- 4420190 -3 117036 35059460 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 2,509.18 515547446.1 117198 35251811 1628.6185 LIGHT & POWER SENIOR CITIZENS 22,677.71 275103 8/212005 118288 XO COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES INC 570.69 PHONE & DATA 117124 17082943 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 570.69 275104 81212005 118562 YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC 11.10 DAILY ADMISSION REFUND 117090 072505 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 170.90 DAILY ADMISSION REFUND 117090 072505 5301.4541 GENERAL ADMISSIONS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation 182.00 304,027.33 Grand Total CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7129/2005 —8/4/2005 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 304,027.33 Total Payments 304,027.33 8/2/2005 14:04:48 Page- 26 R55CKSUM LOG20000 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 90,125.96 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 3,573.26 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 2,677.35 04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND 400.00 05100 ART CENTER FUND 4,472.21 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 1,618.90 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 5,661.17 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 28,226.17 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 1,500.00 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 21,780.42 05800 LIQUOR FUND 98,143.88 05900 UTILITY FUND 34,473.79 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 9,823.53 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 1,550.69 Report Totals 304,027.33 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 7/29/2005 - 8/4/2005 We wnfirm ft dte best of Our b10iwbfte end belief that these Wabw canply 1n ep nwtw rigplotg wftft r- M - lei — Ct s cny Of Edina procedures L. 812/2005 14:21:37 Page - 1 8/10/2005 15:43:08 Page - 1 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 97.24 117380 CITY OF EDINA 5862.5515 R55CKREG LOG20000 VERNON SELLING 106.12 117381 457230 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING - Council Check Register 46.68 117382 458074 5862.5515 8/11/2005 - 8/11/2005 VERNON SELLING Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 275117 811112005 YORK SELLING 102403 AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT 57.40 117384 84.55 BLACK DIRT 117493 22106 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 104.52 35.15 SOD 117494 22787 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 191.70 SOD 117495 22107 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5862.5515 133.54 DIRT & SOD 117496 22163 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 117770 444.94 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 275118 8/11/2005 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 457152 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 8/10/2005 15:43:08 Page - 1 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 97.24 117380 458173 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 106.12 117381 457230 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING - 46.68 117382 458074 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX _ VERNON SELLING 35.40 117383 458072 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 57.40 117384 458172 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 104.52 117385 458175 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 84.52 117769 457154 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 51.44 117770 456818 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 44.12 117771 457152 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 627.44 275119 8/11/2005 102191 ADVANCED GRAPHIC SYSTEMS INC. 617.49 TONER CARTRIDGES 117577 00062457 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 617.49 275120 8/1112005 102128 AEARO CO. 44.00 SAFETY GLASSES 117853 SA04267757 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 44.00 ` 275121 8/11/2005 102626 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES 987.42 READY MIX 117497 4120905 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 893.38 READY MIX 117498 4119719 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 1,175.50 READY MIX 117499 4120369 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 3,056.30 275122 8/11 /2005 103285 AMEM 120.00 AMEM TRAINING CONFERENCE 117578 CONFERENCE 1460.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CIVILIAN DEFENSE 120.00 275123 8/11/2005 101506 AMERICAN HOTEL REGISTER CO. 188.84 HAIR DRYERS 117695 4439094 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 188.84 275124 8/1112005 100630 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC. R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/10/2005 15:43:08 Council Check Register Page - 2 8/11/2005 - 8/11/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 57.40 11 X 17 PAPER 117579 10014849 -00 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 57.40 275125 8111/2005 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 505.44 FOOD 117632 424691 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 505.44 275126 8111/2005 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. 135.79 STAIN INHIBITOR 117696 27278 5620.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH PARK 135.79 275127 8/1112005 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 104.17 WASTE /RECYCLING 117697 080105 7411.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL PSTF OCCUPANCY 104.17 275128 8/11/2005 101954 AUGIE'S INC. 68.40 FOOD 117633 23564 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 68.40 275129 8111/2005 104069 B.B. WATSON GRAPHIC DESIGN 191.70 BUSINESS CARDS 117581 423 1419.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RESERVE PROGRAM 191.70 275130 8111/2005 102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC. 131.38 BATTERIES 117500 25729 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 112.09 BATTERIES 117501 25586 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 243.47 275131 8/11/2005 102709 BIDS LAUNDRY SYSTEMS 355.63 WASHER REPAIR 117854 501561 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 355.63 275132 8/1112005 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 285.50 117388 33926400 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,366.00 117389 34134700 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,006.00 117390 34047500 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,839.00 117391 34064200 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 150.00 117392 34082700 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 172.00 117393 34080100 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,628.00 117394 33926300 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 680.00 117395 34070400 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 320.40 117396 34070200 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 235.79 4.04 39.00 1 -252 45 275133 8111/2005 CITY OF EDINA 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 8110/2005 15:43:08 Council Check Register Page - 3 8/11/2005 -- 8/11/2005 LAWN CARE 117582 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 117397 40305900 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX - YORK SELLING 117398 4036000 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 117399 40307100 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH STREET GENERAL 117774 34134800 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 117776 40327900 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 275133 8111/2005 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 660.39 LAWN CARE 117582 9871 7411.6136 SNOW & LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY 660.39 275134 8/11/2005 101191 BENNEROTTE, JENNIFER 84.40 SAFETY CAMP PHOTOS 117583 SAFETY CAMP 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER PHOTOS 84.40 275135 8/11/2005 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 36.45 CD AND GLUE 117502 4073520 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 74.18 PAPER 117584 4064480 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 165.53 RIBBON, DIVIDER 117585 4064490 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 11.59 SUPPLIES 117586 4075370 1180.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ELECTION 108.68 SUPPLIES 117586 4075370 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 48.00 LABELS, FOLDERS 117587 4085030 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 29.95 LABELS, FOLDERS 117587 4085030 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING 20.22- DIARY RETURNED 117588 CM4057420 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 131.64 SUPPLIES 117589 4065230 5910.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL (BILLING) 70.38 SUPPLIES 117589 4065230 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING 20.21 SUPPLIES 117589 4065230 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 12.95 - LABEL RETURNED 117590 CM4019490 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 170.57 OFFICE SUPPLIES 117855 4076890 1470.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 76.04 OFFICE SUPPLIES 117856 4087710 1470.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 910.05 275136 8/11/2005 111783 BETROS, ARTHUR 374.00 REFUND ROUNDS 117634 REFUND 5401.4591 GREEN FEES EIGHTEEN HOLES GOLF REVENUES 125.00 REFUND ROUNDS 117634 REFUND 5401.4601 DRIVING RANGE GOLF REVENUES 499.00 275137 8/11/2005 100654 BJORK STONE INC. 7,312.50 STONE WALL REPAIR 117698 003 1344.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS RETAINING WALL MAINTENANCE 7,312.50 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/1012005 15:43:08 Council Check Register Page - 4 8111/2005 -- 8/1112005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 275138 8/11/2005 101176 BLEDSOE, SARA 500.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 117635 JULY 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 500.00 275139 811112005 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 2,819.74 CPAP - MEDICAL 117857 50131362 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,819.74 275140 8/11/2005 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 23.60 CAP 117503 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 220.14 FILTER ASSEMBLY 117504 770885 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 243.74 275141 8/11/2005 118607 BROOKS, PATRICIA A. 111.78 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 117699 072905 1624.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLAYGROUND & THEATER 111.78 275142 8/1112005 103386 CARNIVAL TIME RENTAL 723.50 FAM JAM SUPPLIES .117858 20000538 1624.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 723.50 - 275143 8111/2005 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 96.00 117400 41439 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 516.00 117777 41436 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 612.00 275144 8/11/2005 100681 CATCO 20.32 CONNECTORS 117505 1 -58675 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 20.32 275145 8/1112005 101865 CATCO PARTS & SERVICE 8.12 CAP & CHAIN 117506 3 -81326 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 419.46 FITTINGS, CORE CHARGES 117507 3 -81358 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 128.65 PIGGY BACKS 117508 3 -81344 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 556.23 275146 8/1112005 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 379.11 PRINTER SUPPLIES 117859 TD49062 1470.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 359.93 PRINTER SUPPLIES 117860 TD94423 1470.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 739.04 275147 8/11/2005 101223 CITIES FORD R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/11/2005 - 8/1112005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 138.50 AIR CONDITIONER PART 117700 118596WFOW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 4.21 AIR CONDITIONER PART 117701 118636WFOW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 8110/2005 15:43:08 Page- 1 5 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 142.71 275148 8/11/2005 100087 CITY OF ST. PAUL 250.00 BACKGROUND TRAINING 117591 090028 1400.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 250.00 275149 8/11/2005 105693 CITYSPRINT 141.40 COURIER 117592 11001 -1916 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 22.66 COURIER 117592 11001 -1916 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 10.59 COURIER 117592 11001 -1916 1180.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ELECTION 174.65 275150 8/11/2005 103258 COLLIERS TURLEY MAh "FR 49.00 CTMT MARKET REPORTS X593 MARKET REPORTS 1190.6105 DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 49.00 275151 8/11/2005 102703 COMMERCIAL POOL & SPA SUPPLIES = 35.00 POOL PATCH 117702 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 35.00 275152 8/1112005 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 85.81 PHONE HOLDERS, STING SWABS 117509 02625273 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 85.81 275153 8/11/2005 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 1,891.23 KILN 117636 000014400 110 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 1,891.23 275154 8/11/2005 110556 CPR TECHNOLOGY 95.55 BATTERIES 117510 SI- 30039870 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 95.55 275155 8/11/2005 100701 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. 132.20 CYLINDER, WATER PUMP 117703 131952 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 132.20 275156 8111/2005 100710 DAVE'S DAIRY 522.00 DAIRY 117637 TO 7/25/05 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 522.00 CITY OF EDINA 8/1012005 15:43:08 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 6 8/11/2005 8/11/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 275157 8/11/2005 116713 DAVEY TREE EXPERT CO., THE 245.75 TREE SERVICE 117638 97699561 5630.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL LAKES 245.75 275158 8111/2005 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING 13.40 117401 324722 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,513.70 117402 324721 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,558.80 117403 323803 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 58.00 117404 323341 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 123.00 117405 324237 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,148.70 117778 324718 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,391.08 117779 324720 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 40.20 117780 324719 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 59.40 117781 323804 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 9,906.28 275159 811112005 102455 DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES INC 20.00 CONTRACTED SERVICE 117511 1- 042555 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 20.00 275160 8/11/2005 118490 DEEP ROCK WATER COMPANY 217.34 ACCT 6091800 -6 117704 073105 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 217.34 275161 8/11/2005 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 37.38 BAKERY 117639 197359 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 84.63 BAKERY 117640 196992 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 53.86 BAKERY 117641 196993 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 83.84 BAKERY 117642 196991 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 259.71 275162 8/11/2005 102712 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION 383.35 117705 W05060567 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 37.00 JUNE 2005 WAN 117861 DV05060277 1400.6204 TELETYPE SERVICE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 420.35 275163 8/1112005 101675 DESHLER, BRANDON 127.50 3 MONTHS RENTAL 117594 CELL PHONE 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 127.50 275164 8/11/2005 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST 14.90 117862 201638860 5430.6188 TELEPHONE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE CITY OF EDINA 8/10/200b 15:43:08 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 7 8/11/2005 - 8/11/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 128.00 117862 201638860 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 437.60 117863 201638869 5610.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 580.50 275165 8/11/2005 100420 DOGGIE WALK BAGS 197.00 DOG WALK BAGS 117706 200507275 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 197.00 275166 8/1112005 112663 DOLLARS & SENSE 716.66 117782 20656 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING _ 716.66 117782 20656 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 716.68 117782 20656 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 2,150.00 275167 8/1112005 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 8,490.25 117595 1250184 1195.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES 8,490.25 275168 8/1112005 101747 DRESSER TRAP ROCK INC. - 28,885.91 FA -2 CHIPS 117513 56098 1314.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK STREET RENOVATION 19,239.92 FA -2 CHIPS 117514 56220 1314.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK STREET RENOVATION 48,125.83 275169 8/11/2005 100739 EAGLE WINE 92.61 117406 266077 5862.5513 - COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 223.13 117407 26722 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 542.07 117408 270954 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 646.59 117409 270956 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 859.96 117783 270959 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,238.30 117784 268917 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,602.66 275170 8/11/2005 100740 EARL F. ANDERSEN INC. 223.52 PAINT 117515 0066946 -IN 1335.6532 PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS 223.52 275171 8/11/2005 100741 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 3,755.90 117410 326884 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,121.95 117411 326894 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 477.00 BEER 117644 14538 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 2,175.70 117785 326976 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 8,507.70 117786 326990 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA 8/1012005 15:43:08 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 8 8/11/2005 8/1112005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 19,038.25 275172 8111/2005 102955 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS 113.85 7/19 BUS TRIP 117864 05 -064 1624.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 121.50 7122 BUS TRIP 117865 05 -063 1624.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 385.65 COMO ZOO, VALLEY FAIR TRIPS 117866 05 -062 1624.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 1,165.90 CORNELIA PK BUSSING 117867 05 -061 1624.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 1,786.90 275173 8/1112005 103594 EDINALARM INC. 357.84 117412 36507 5821.6250 ALARM SERVICE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 600.66 117412 36507 5841.6250 ALARM SERVICE YORK OCCUPANCY 357.84 117412 36507 5861.6250 ALARM SERVICE VERNON OCCUPANCY 1,316.34 275174 8/11/2005 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC 87.28 PHARMACY 117868 INV729240 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 87.28 275175 8/11/2005 106213 EMSAR TWIN CITIES 660.34 COT MAINTENANCE 115334 9515 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 660.34 275176 8/11/2005 105339 ENRGI 1,567.50 WEBSITE CONSULTING 117707 3004 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 1,567.50 275177 811112005 100752 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC. 1,592.18 CURB BOXES, FRAMES 117575 HH3493 5932.6536 CASTINGS GENERAL STORM SEWER 1,592.18 275178 8/11/2005 100018 EXPERT T BILLING 5,496.00 JULY TRANSPORTS 117869 080405 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5,496.00 . 275179 8/11/2005 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 128.00 117787 330370 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 64.00 117788 330368 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 192.00 275180 8/11/2005 100297 FAST FOTO & DIGITAL 21.30 PHOTO FOLDERS 117870 T2- 208287 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER CITY OF EDINA 8/10/2005 15:43:08 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 9 8/11/2005 -- 8/11/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 21.30 275181 8/11/2005 113720 FASTENER PLACE 32.68 FASTENERS 117517 15901 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 32.68 275182 8111/2005 102910 FASTSIGNS 3,176.58 117413 190 -27056 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 3,176.58 275183 8/11/2005 102003 FASTSIGNS BLOOMINGTON 776.81 SIGNAGE 117645 190 -27035 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 776.81 275184 8/1112005 102669 FDSOA 75.00 DUES 117871 080405 1470.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 75.00 275185 8/1112005 100756 FEDERAL EXPRESS 8.86 117598 3- 938 -73488 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 8.86 275186 8/11/2005 104474 FILTERFRESH 179.94 COFFEE SERVICE 117518 99042 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 179.94 275187 8/11/2005 101475 FOOTJOY 132.85 COAT 117646 3523587 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 132.85 275186 8/11/2005 102380 FORMS GROUP, THE 439.85 OFFICE SUPPLIES 117647 00004157 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 439.85 275189 8/11/2005 105599 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO. 170.87 DENTAL PREMIUMS 117872 072005 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 7,039.12 DENTAL PREMIUMS 117872 . 072005 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 7,209.99 275190 811112005 104071 FREUND, JEFF 264.91 PETTY CASH 117708 080305 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 264.91 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8111/2005 -- 8/11/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 275191 8/11/2005 102456 GALLS INC. 63.36 UNIFORM PURCHASE 117709 5781650400013 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE ^.429.75 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/10/2005 15:43:08 Page - 10 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL MOWING EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS - GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAIz. FIRE DEPT. GENERAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS GENERAL MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 63.36 275192 811112005 105508 GEMPLER'S INC. 72.25 SCRAPERS 117710 1006633066 1641.6406 72.25 275193 8111/2005 100775 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION 180.00 KICKBALL SHIRTS 117648 70504 4077.6406 180.00 275194 8/11/2005 101679 GOLFCRAFT 493.00 CLUBS 117649 19390 5440.5511 493.00 275195 8111/2005 101103 GRAINGER 165.20 FAN BELTS, FILTERS -117519 498 - 910784 -4 1551.6406 465.94 TUIBING, HOSE REEL 117519 498 - 910784 -4 1470.6406 62.27 FAN 117520 498811496 -5 1330.6406 16.24 HAND TOOLS 117521 498811497 -3 1301.6556 28.50 BRACKET, BALL VALVES 117711 495 -073996 -3 1470.6406 738.15 275196 8/11/2005 102670 GRAND PERE WINES INC 88.00 117789 00013651 5842.5513 88.00 275197 8/1112005 102202 GRAND VIEW LODGE 176.00 MN /SCIA CONFERENCE 117599 RESERVATION 1400.6104 176.00 275198 8/1112005 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 4,436.25 117414 74409 5862.5513 396.25 117415 74328 5862.5513 503.25 117790 74532 5822.5513 2,406.00 117791 74408 5822.5513 138.50 117792 74404 5842.5513 4,436.25 117793 74410 5842.5513 11325 117794 74533 5842.5513 ^.429.75 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/10/2005 15:43:08 Page - 10 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL MOWING EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS - GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAIz. FIRE DEPT. GENERAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS GENERAL MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/10/2005 15:43:08 Council Check Register Page - 11 8/11/2005 - 8/11/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 275199 811112005 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 1,919.43 LIGHTING 117650 910303477 1375.6530 REPAIR PARTS PARKING RAMP 175.68 LIGHTING SYSTEMS 117651 910773094 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 250.28 BULBS 117712 910841028 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 2,345.39 275200 8/1112005 101409 GREAT AMERICAN MARINE 778.49 BOAT TRAILER 117873 72105 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 778.49 275201 8/1112005 102125 GREG LESSMAN SALES 408.90 GOLF BALLS 117652 30916 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 408.90 275202 8/1112005 100785 GREUPNER, JOE 2,245.80 CREDIT CARD LESSONS 117653 GOLF LESSONS 5410.6132 PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION 1,270.00 JUNIOR GROUPS 117653 GOLF LESSONS 5410.6132 PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION 3,515.80 v 275203 8/1112005 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 56.65 117416 270879 5822.5515 COST OFGOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 112.74- 117417 672177 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 88.75- 117418 671639 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 36.82- 117419 672146 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 341.55- 117420 672142 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 718.88 117421 268930 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 9,108.86 117422 267639 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 285.75- 117795 671934 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 283.60- 117796 672158 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 29.40- 117797 672167 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 886.80 117798 270880 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 283.60 117799 269333 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,140.20 117800 268882 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 9,659.76 117801 270877 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,946.78 117802 270905 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 131.14 117803 270878 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 108.60 117804 270904 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 147.84 117805 269334 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 27,010.50 275204 811112005 105504 HAMILTON, WAYNE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/10/2005 15:43:08 Council Check Register Page - 12 8/11/2005 -- 8/11/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 100.00 PERFORMANCE 8/15/05 117874 080105 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER - ED ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS BOARD & ROOM PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES REPAIR PARTS PARKING RAMP 100.00 PARKING RAMP REPAIR PARTS PARKING RAMP REPAIR PARTS 275205 8/11/2005 102618 HARDWOOD CREEK LUMBER INC 85.47 LATH 117523 6222 1325.6406 85.47 275206 8111/2005 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 3,822.16 ROOM & BOARD 117600 001053 1195.6225 3,822.16 275207 8/11/2005 116640 HERITAGE CROSS APPAREL 65.78 CLOTHES 117654 21081 5440.5511 65.78 275208 8/11/2005 100805 HIRSHFIELD'S 151.12 PAINT 117524 026197995 1375.6530 151.12 PAINT 117525 026198534 1375.6530 151.12 PAINT 117526 026198120 1375.6530 104.30 PAINT, BRUSHES 117527 026198291 1375.6530 557.66 275209 8/1112005 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 312.00 117423 365627 5842.5514 312.00 275210 8/11/2005 103333 HORSTMANN, NILEEN 20.00 DEFENSIVE DRIVING REFUND 117655 REFUND 1628.4392.09 20.00 275211 8/11/2005 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS 79.96 2005 UNIFORM - PANTS 117528 UNIFORM PANTS 1646.6201 79.96 275212 8/11/2005 105007 HUTCHINSON TELEPHONE COMPANY 6,692.64 SERVICE CONTRACT 117601 HTCINVO06542 1400.6230 6,692.64 275213 8/11/2005 100811 HYDRO METERING TECHNOLOGY 578.30 WATER METERS 117568 0030299 -IN 5914.5516 578.30 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS BOARD & ROOM PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES REPAIR PARTS PARKING RAMP REPAIR PARTS PARKING RAMP REPAIR PARTS PARKING RAMP REPAIR PARTS PARKING RAMP COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS LAUNDRY SENIOR CITIZENS BUILDING MAINTENANCE SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD METERS TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR CITY OF EDINA 8/10/2005 15:43:08 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 13 8/11/2005 811112005 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 275214 8/11/2005 102223 IMPERIAL HEADWEAR INC 199.75 HATS 117656 _ 628260 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 199.75 275215 8/11/2005 117432 IMPERIAL SCOTT SPECIALTIES INC 41.34 GLOW BRACELETS 117602 13251 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 43.50 GLOW BRACELETS 117603 13232 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 84.84 275216 8/11/2005 105894 INDUSTRIAL FLOOR MAINTENANCE 1 193.96 BROOM, FILTER 117713 .20588 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 193.96 275217 8/11/2005 105540 INFO USA 300.00 MAILING LIST UPDATES 117604 5 -19- 095025 2210.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 300.00 275218 8/1112005 116191 INSTY- PRINTS 94.76 OUTLINE 117605 70387 1400.6575 PRINTING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 94.76 275219 8/11/2005 102157 JEFF ELLIS & ASSOCIATES INC. 500.00 SUMMER AUDIT #3 117714 20021743 5310.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL ADMINISTRATION 500.00 275221 8/11/2005 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 6.67- 117424 287015 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 14,67- 117425 287014 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 67.05 117426 1934830 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,446.84 117427 1934832 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,748.46 117428 1934826 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 67.10- 117429 286199 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 50.95- 117430 286466 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,372.75 117806 1938482 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 421.30 117807 1938478 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,267.62 117808 1934829 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 6,845.47 117809 1934822 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,141.27 117810 1938473 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5,325.93 117811 1934819 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING B1.88 117812 1938475 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,903.10 117813 1938472 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 382.75 117814 1938470 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA 8/1012005 15:43:08 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 14 8/11/2005 -- 811112005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,398.00 117815 1938474 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,140.64 117816 1938479 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 96.95 117817 1938477 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 788.18 117818 1938471 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,677.11 117819 1934828 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5,144.61 117820 1934831 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 30.94 117821 1938481 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 4,114,97 117822 1938480 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 296.80 117823 1938465 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 152.30 117824 1938466 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 319.96 117825 1938467 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 897.64 117826 31938468 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 354.85 117827 1938469 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 50,259.98 275222 8/11/2005 100919 JOHNSON, NAOMI 26.12 PETTY CASH 117657 PETTY CASH 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 2.76 PETTY CASH 117657 PETTY CASH 5110.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 72.17 PETTY CASH 117657 PETTY CASH 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 94.72 PETTY CASH 117657 PETTY CASH 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMNISTRATION 116.35 PETTY CASH 117657 PETTY CASH 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 6.90 PETTY CASH 117657 PETTY CASH 5110.6235 POSTAGE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 21.69 PETTY CASH 117657 PETTY CASH 5111.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 15.95 PETTY CASH 117657 PETTY CASH 5125.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 356.66 275223 8/1112005 100553 KEEHR, GREGORY 43.10 TASTING CUPS 117431 TASTING CUPS 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 43.10 275224 8/1112005 111018 KEEPRS INC. 19.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 117715 39618 -01 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 252.64 UNIFORM 117875 37953 -03 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 246.25 UNIFORM 117876 38561 -02 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 141.80 UNIFORM 117877 39999 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 58.52 UNIFORM 117878 39319 -03 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 169.95 UNIFORM 117879 39319 -02 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 888.16 275225 8/11/2005 118397 KLEIN UNDERGROUND LLC 2,400.00 CONTRACTED SERVICE 117530 21664 1301.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL MAINTENANCE `,400.00 CITY OF EDINA 8/10/2005 15:43:08 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 15 8/11/2005 - 8/11/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 275226 8/11/2005 100846 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO 9,200.60 117432 442951 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 32.00 117433 442952 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 975.05 117916 442951ADD 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 10,207.65 275227 8/11/2005 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 204.58 IMPACT WRENCH 117531 3466273 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 171.47 HOLESAWS, WASHERS 117532 3458230 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 376.05 275228 8/11/2005 103396 LENT, WILLIAM 520.00 RIFLE & CASE 117880 080805 1600.4390.21 FIREARM SAFETY TRAINING PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 520.00 275229 8/1112005 106301 LOFFLER COMPANIES INC. 56.00 COPY MACHINE 117533 122581 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 56.00 275230 8/11/2005 100858 LOGIS 8.04 117881 033105 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 25.90 117881 033105 5910.6160 DATA PROCESSING GENERAL (BILLING) 45.24 117881 033105 5410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 278.00 117881 033105 2210.6160 DATA PROCESSING COMMUNICATIONS 738.93 117881 033105 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 951,28 117881 033105 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 5,016.63 117881 033105 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 5,789.16 117881 033105 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 6,614.66 117881 033105 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 58,97 117882 063005 5910.6160 DATA PROCESSING GENERAL (BILLING) 97,27 117882 063005 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 134.88 117882 063005 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 135.38 117882 063005 5410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 268.15 117882 063005 2210.6160 DATA PROCESSING COMMUNICATIONS 631.78 117882 063005 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,938.27 117882 063005 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 23,762.54 275231 8/11/2005 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1,420.20 117434 184361 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 459.78 CANDY 117658 184654 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 8/1012005 15:43:08 Page - 16 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN YORK OCCUPANCY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 4,486.89 CRS -2 117534 815791 CITY OF EDINA ROAD OIL R55CKREG LOG20000 4,493.97 CRS -2 117535 773269 1314.6519 ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION 4,453.83 CRS -2 Council Check Register 782283 1314.6519 ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION 60.00 8/11/2005 - 8/1112005 RBC952048 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1314.6519 ROAD OIL 1,879.98 60.00 TRAILER RENTAL 117539 096337 275232 811112005 STREET RENOVATION 101741 M. SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS INC. TRAILER FEE 117717 096309 1314.6519 ROAD OIL 15.00 WINE SPECTATOR 117731 847911 5822.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 15.00 275236 8/11/2005 100868 MARK VII SALES 275233 8/11/2005 100864 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. 117435 827845 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 208.27 AIR FILTER ASSEMBLY 117716 2052648 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 208.27 1,827.50 117437 827579 275234 811112005 YORK SELLING 112095 MAGIC CARPET SPECIALISTS INC. 117438 827580 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 319.50 CARPET CLEANING 117883 062005 5841.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 271.58 CARPET CLEANING 117884 063005 5821.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 591.08 208.10 BEER 117659 826673 275235 8/11/2005 RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 102981 MARATHON ASHLAND PETROLEUM LLC 117830 830362 8/1012005 15:43:08 Page - 16 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN YORK OCCUPANCY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 4,486.89 CRS -2 117534 815791 1314.6519 ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION 4,493.97 CRS -2 117535 773269 1314.6519 ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION 4,453.83 CRS -2 -117536 782283 1314.6519 ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION 60.00 TRAILER 117537 RBC952048 1314.6519 ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION 4,411.34 CRS -2 117538 764786 1314.6519 ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION 60.00 TRAILER RENTAL 117539 096337 1314.6519 ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION 90.00 TRAILER FEE 117717 096309 1314.6519 ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION 18,056.03 275236 8/11/2005 100868 MARK VII SALES 3,882.35 117435 827845 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,451.45 117436 825585 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,827.50 117437 827579 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,140.95 117438 827580 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 119,20 117439 827846 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 98.00 117440 827847 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 208.10 BEER 117659 826673 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 159.00 117830 830362 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,825.43 117831 830106 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,730.65 117832 830363 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 98.00 117833 830108 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 57.60 117834 830107 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 648.00 117835 830472 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 600.00 117836 827596 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 16,846.23 8/10120u- — :43:08 Page - 17 Subledger Account Description Business Unit CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FIRST AID SUPPLIES CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Registy 8/11/2005 8/11/2' Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Ac: 275237 8/11112005 103280 MARLIN COMPANY, THE 586.57 COMMUNICATIONS PROGRAM 117540 329608 586.57 275238 8/11/2005 101030 MATHISON CO. 27.02 117660 608980 -0 0 27.02 275239 8111/2005 102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC 62.50 PHONE CHANGES 117718 26026 38 62.50 275240 8/1112005 100870 MATRX 69.00 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 117885 897745 510 69.00 275241 8/1112005 100875 MCCAREN DESIGNS INC. 460.08 PLANTS 117719 31551 5620.6620 460.08 275242 8/11/2005 102197 MCFOA 40.00 DUES 117897 J TIMM 1120.610 40.00 DUES 117898 D MANGEN 1120.610 80.00 275243 8/11/2005 100515 MCM ELECTRONICS 115,11 117661 502596 5125.6406 115.11 275244 8/11/2005 103189 MEDICA 1,341.31 MEDICAL INSURANCE 117886 105213122552 1550.6040 1,341.31 275245 8/11/2005 103189 MEDICA 902.67 COBRA 117887 105213134271 1550.6043 5,069.08 MEDICAL INSURANCE 117887 105213134271 1550.6040 5,971.75 275246 8/11/2005 103189 MEDICA 3,904.98 COBRA 117888 105213125472 1550.6043 53,510.78 MEDICAL INSURANCE 117888 105213125472 1550.6040 57,415.76 8/10120u- — :43:08 Page - 17 Subledger Account Description Business Unit CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH PARK DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/11/2005 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 8/11/2005 -- 8/11/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 275247 8/11/2005 103189 MEDICA 10,013.91 COBRA 117889 105213102386 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE 67,130.86 117889 105213102386 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION 1628.6103.07 1470.6215 1646.6406 1646.6406 1643.6530 1643.6556 5620.6406 5620.6406 1552.6511 5620.6530 1552.6511 1470.6406 1553.6180 1551.6180 TRIPS PROF SERVICES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS 8110/2005 15:43:08 Page - 18 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL SENIOR CITIZENS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL TURF CARE EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK CENT SVC PW BUILDING EDINBOROUGH PARK CENT SVC PW BUILDING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN' CITY HALL GENERAL 77,144.77 275248 8/11/2005 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 2,564.50 8/18 LUNCH CRUISE /SHOWBOAT 117662 AUGUST 18 CRUISE 2,564.50 275249 8/11/2005 100953 MEDTRONIC PHYSIO CONTROL CORP. 600.00 LIFEPAK CONTRACT 117890 PC690910 600.00 275250 8/11/2005 101483 MENARDS 110.95 LUMBER, PLASTIC 117720 46989 74.64 CRACK SEAL, VULKEM 117721 43946 92.62 SPRINKLER HEADS, HOSE 117722 45157 43.55 PITCH FORKS, TIEDOWN 117723 46788 321.76 275251 8/1112005 101987 MENARDS 160.52 BAR CLAMPS 117891 12141 15.51 HOOKS 117892 12677 176.03 275252 8/11/2005 100882 MERIT SUPPLY 305.87 PAINT REMOVER, LPSI & LPSII 117541 67427 670.28 FLOOR SCRUBBER PARTS 117724 67407 232.81 LOTION, LINERS, CUPS 117725 67469 190.48 DEGREASER 117893 67474 1,399.44 275253 8A1 /2005 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAI 641.00 REPAIRS 117726 FOCS99684 641.00 275254 8/11/2005 116696 MGE UPS SYSTEMS 694.76 UPS REPAIR 117606 271285 694.76 1628.6103.07 1470.6215 1646.6406 1646.6406 1643.6530 1643.6556 5620.6406 5620.6406 1552.6511 5620.6530 1552.6511 1470.6406 1553.6180 1551.6180 TRIPS PROF SERVICES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS 8110/2005 15:43:08 Page - 18 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL SENIOR CITIZENS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL TURF CARE EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK CENT SVC PW BUILDING EDINBOROUGH PARK CENT SVC PW BUILDING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN' CITY HALL GENERAL CITY OF EDINA 8110/2005 15:43:08 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 19 8/11/2005 -- 8/11/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 275255 8/11/2005 104650 MICRO CENTER 212.98 NEW SERVER UPS 117894 936922 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 212.98 275256 8/11/2005 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 143.79 TACK 117542 74630MB 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 28.76 TACK 117542 74630MB 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 874.79 ASPHALT 117543 74830MB 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 12,581.23 ASPHALT 117543 74830MB 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 184.02 ASPHALT 117544 75066MB 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,442.06 ASPHALT 117544 75066MB 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 15,254.65 275257 8/11/2005 102007 MINNCOR INDUSTRIES 466.47 OPEN PEDESTAL GRILL 117727 110868 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 106.50 PARK BENCH LEGS 117728 110875 1647.6530 REPAIR PARTS PATHS & HARD SURFACE 572.97 275258 8/11/2005 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 5.61 TANK RENTAL 117545 R107052804 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 16.84 CO2 117663 R107050234 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 22.45 275259 8/1112005 100913 MINNEAPOLIS SUBURBAN SEWER & W 900.00 REPAIRED MAIN BREAK 117569 32710 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 900.00 EMERGENCY WATER SERVICE REPAIR 117570 32711 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1,260.00 EMERGENCY WATER SERVICE REPAIR 117571 32715 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1,440.00 EMERGENCY WATER SERVICE REPAIR 117572 32714 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1,710.00 REPAIR WATER SERVICE 117573 32713 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 720.00 TURN OFF CORP 117574 32712 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 6,930.00 275260 8/1112005 118609 MINNESOTA CLE 235.00 SEMINAR 117729 080205 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING 235.00 275261 8111/2005 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 150.00 PERMIT APPLICATION 117607 PERMIT 01217.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS RECONSTRUCT SCHAEFER CIRCLE APPLICATION 150.00 275262 8/11/2005 101559 MINNESOTA STATE FIRE CHIEFS AS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8110/2005 15:43:08 Council Check Register Page - 20 8111/2005 - 8/11/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 165.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 117895 080405 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 165.00 275263 8/1112005 100899 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER 7,349.71 JULY 2005 117730 080305 1495.4380 SURCHARGE INSPECTIONS 7,349.71 275264 8/1112005 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER 222.30 AIR PUMP 117896 0065674 -IN 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 222.30 275265 811112005 101316 MMBA 1,666.66 117441 DUES 5820.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 50TH STREET GENERAL 1,666.66 117441 DUES 5840.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 1,666.68 117441 DUES 5860.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 5,000.00 275266 811112005 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 745.33 CYLINDER BLOCK KIT, GASKETS -117546 487878 -00 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 28.99 NOZZLES 117547 486698 -00 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 970.60 FERTILIZER & FUNGICIDE 117664 453821 -00 5630.6540 PERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES 1,744.92 275267 8/1112005 118620 MULTISCAPES INCORPORATED 300.00 REPLACE PAVERS 117917 1255 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 300.00 275268 8/11/2005 100916 MUZAK - NORTH CENTRAL 198.54 MUSIC JULY -SEPT 117665 MUSIC SERVICE 5630.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL LAKES 198.54 275269 8111/2005 101108 NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE 62.68 CRAFT SUPPLIES 117666 0727501EAAJ 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 62.68 275270 8/11/2005 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 482.00 117442 32410 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 482.00 275271 8111/2005 104672 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 369.47 CELLULAR SERVICE 117609 909583317 -044 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 66.89 CELLULAR SERVICE 117611 679000121 -033 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS CITY OF EDINA 8/1012005 15:43:08 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 21 8/11/2005 - 8/11/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 17.89 CELLULAR SERVICE 117611 679000121 -033 1120.6188 TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION 114.68 117733 737969523 -014 1495.6188 TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS 568.93 275272 8/1112005 104350 NIKE USA INC. 66.70 CLUB 117667 902364584 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 66.70 275273 8/11/2005 102652 NORTHLAND CHEMICAL CORP. 161.08 CLEANERS 117548 92051 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 161.08 275274 8/11/2005 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY 100.65 117668 31747700 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 58.13 117669 31733700 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 158.78 275275 8111/2005 100930 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO. 302.29 FLOOR DRY CLAY 117549 ')45 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATIQN.GEN 66.26 TURFMASTER TIRES 117550 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES' EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 368.55 275276 8/11/2005 116480 NSITE MYSTERY SHOPPING 165.00 117443 MYSTERY °22.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING SHOPPING 165.00 117443 MYSTERY 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING SHOPPING 165.00 117443 MYSTERY 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING SHOPPING 495.00 275277 8/11/2005 102557 NTOA 150.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 117732 ID 34109 1a- 0.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 150.00 275278 811112005 103212 NYHLENS FILTER RECYCLING 100.00 USED FILTERS & OILS 117551 337397 1280.6271 HAZ. WASTE DISPOSAL SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 100.00 275279 8/11/2005 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 21.78 LABELS 117734 300037874 -001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 136.62 TONER 117735 299856700 -001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/10/2005 15:43:08 Council Check Register Page - 22 8/11/2005 - 8/11/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 158.40 275280 8/1112005 105612 OFFICE TEAM 784.13 SARA ST. JAMES - TEMP 117736 13726781 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 799.50 SARA ST. JAMES - TEMP 117737 13797359 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1553.6530 460.00- 117444 1,583.63 5842.5513 102.50 117445 275281 8/11/2005 325.00 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 8076736 5862.5514 2,872.90 117446 69.44 CHAIN 117738 350222 8077508 5862.5513 69.44 117837 8077510 -IN 5842.5513 275282 8/1112005 8077509 -IN 100939 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC. 8,471.60 97.24 COOKIES 117670 10844553 477.75 117671 97.24 5630.5510 243.50 117739 275283 8/11/2005 103624 P & L AUTOMOTIVE INC. 185.00 WINDOW TINTING 117918 155743 185.00 275284 8/11/2005 101718 PARTS PLUS 2,019.69 PARTS 117899 072605 2,019.69 275285 8111/2005 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1553.6530 460.00- 117444 81076878 5842.5513 102.50 117445 8077511 5842.5514 325.00 117446 8076736 5862.5514 2,872.90 117446 8076736 5862.5513 1,779.50 117447 8077508 5862.5513 2,443.00 117837 8077510 -IN 5842.5513 1,408.70 117838 8077509 -IN 5822.5513 8,471.60 275286 8/1112005 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 477.75 117671 77104267 5630.5510 243.50 117739 79663199 5320.5510 721.25 275287 8/11/2005 105806 PERFORMANCE KENNELS INC. 63.69 JUMBO GREENIES 117740 1455 1438.6406 63.69 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GRILL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING CENTENNIAL LAKES POOL CONCESSIONS K -9 UNIT R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 275288 8/11/2005 12,771.03 275289 8/1112005 105875 PICKERMAN'S SOUP AND SANDWICHE 203.85 SNACKS 117672 1013 5111.5510 203.85 275290 8/11/2005 100819 POPP TELECOM CITY OF EDINA 150.00 Council Check Register 117741 76583 8/11/2005 - 8/11/2005 Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 101811 PREMIER FLEET SERVICES 1,506.95 117448 2223602 5862.5513 997.45 117449 2223600 5862.5513 47.20 117450 2223601 5862.5515 10.56- 117451 3321649 5862.5513 4,720.00 117452 2223765 5862.5513 400.00 117453 2223073 5822.5513 1.90 117839 2226238 5862.5513 2,391.25 117840 2226244 5862.5513 396.74 117841 2226239 5842.5512 407.70 117842 2226245 5862.5512 917.75 117843 2226235 5822.5513 854.85 117844 2226236 5822.5513 139.80 117845 2226237 5822.5512 12,771.03 275289 8/1112005 105875 PICKERMAN'S SOUP AND SANDWICHE 203.85 SNACKS 117672 1013 5111.5510 203.85 275290 8/11/2005 100819 POPP TELECOM 150.00 PHONE REPAIRS 117741 76583 5410.6230 150.00 1628.6575 PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS 636.11 275291 8111/2005 101811 PREMIER FLEET SERVICES 1,992.50 REPAIR SERVICES 117742 18374 1553.6180 1,999.00 REPAIR SERVICES 117743 18293 4091.6406 523.77 REPAIR SERVICES 117744 18353 1553.6180 4,515.27 117455 270958 5822.5515 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 8/10/2005 15:43:08 Page - 23 VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW REVOLVING CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 275292 8/11/2005 101032 PRINT SHOP, THE 636.11 AUGUST NEWSLETTER 117673 IP101876 1628.6575 PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS 636.11 275293 8111/2005 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 403.00 117454 269654 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 93.00 117455 270958 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,079.23 117456 270957 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 695.20 117457 2710955 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 108.87- 117458 671946 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,205.53 117459 267646 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,273.09 117846 270960 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA 8110/2005 15:43:08 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 24 8/11/2005 8/11/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 5,640.18 275294 8/1112005 117721 PROSOURCE EDUCATIONAL SERVICES 1,480.00 COMPUTER TRAINING 117900 5071188 1554.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,480.00 275295 8/11/2005 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 184.85 TISSUE, ROLLTOWEL 117745 3602 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 184.85 275296 8/11/2005 100186 PROULX, ADAM 89.95 UNIFORM PURCHASE 117746 080405 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 89.95 275297 8111/2005 101877 PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY 8.70 COBRA 117902 080205 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 8.70 275298 8/11/2005 105419 PSC ALLIANCE INC. 3,111.42 800 MHZ RADIO 117674 2000339 44003.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 800 MHZ RADIO 3,111.42 275299 811112005 103713 PUBLIC AGENCY TRAINING COUNCIL 225.00 ARSON SEMINAR 117901 66851 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 225.00 275300 8/11/2005 100971 QUALITY WINE 30.39- 117460 581037 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 140.00- 117461 581143 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 457.52 117463 585870 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4.50- 117463 585870 -00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 2,162,18 117464 586002 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 42,90- 117464 586002 -00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 1,068.41 117465 585835 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 10.50- 117465 585835 -00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 1,093.13 117466 582811 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 10.80- 117466 582811 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 2,659.09 117467 586228 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 26.35- 117467 586228 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 1,737.34 117468 585836 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 17,16- 117468 585836 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 304.32 117469 585871 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING CITY OF EDINA 8/10/2005 15:43:08 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 25 8/11/2005 - 8/11/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3.00- 117469 585871 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 705.49 117470 586001 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 13,97- 117470 586001 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 624.87 117471 585367 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 6.20- 117471 585367 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 541.82 117472 585786 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5.36- 117472 585786 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 19.68- 117847 581969 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,340.86 117848 586047 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 13,364.22 275301 8/11/2005 101965 QWEST 86.56 952 929 -9549 117903 9549 -7/05 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 96.25 952 927 -8861 117904 8861 -7/05 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 54.79 952 929 -0297 117905 0297 -7/05 4090.6188 TELEPHONE STREET REVOLVING 115.14 117919 JUL28Z28 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 175.89 117919 JUL28Z28 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 197.35 117919 JUL28Z28 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 198.74 117919 JUL28Z28 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 326.19 117919 JUL28Z28 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 338.22 117919 JUL28Z28 5610.6188 TELEPHONE ED ADMINISTRATION 341.48 117919 JUL28Z28 5911.6188 TELEPHONE PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER 388.06 117919 JUL28Z28 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 401.90 117919 JUL28Z28 5932.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL STORM SEWER 437.23 117919 JUL28Z28 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 510.54 117919 JUL28Z28 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 4,478.17 117919 JUL28Z28 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 8,146.51 275302 8111/2005 117692 R & B CLEANING INC. 447.30 CLEAN RAMP STAIRWELLS 117920 1274 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 447.30 275303 8/11/2005 118610 R &D BATTERIES, INC 170.40 BATTERIES 117747 560886 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 170.40 275304 8/1112005 113422 RAKE PUBLISHING INC. 153.33 ADVERTISING 117473 6775 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 153.34 ADVERTISING 117473 6775 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 153.33 ADVERTISING 117473 6775 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 460.00 8/10/2005 15:43:08 Page - 26 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH PARK DISTRIBUTION BUILDING MAINTENANCE RECYCLING 150.00 PERFORMANCE 8/17/05 117906 CITY OF EDINA 5610.6136 R55CKREG LOG20000 ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 Council Check Register 8/11/2005 118001 ROZEBOOM MILLER ARCHITECTS -INC 8/11 /2005 -- 8/1112005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 275305 8/11/2005 104643 RECREATION SUPPLY COMPANY 886.07 LOCKER ROOM BENCHES 117748 113770 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 886.07 275306 8/1112005 117750 100975 RED WING SHOE STORE 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 118.15 SAFETY BOOTS 117749 7250000328 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 293.65 SAFETY BOOTS 117749 7250000328 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 411.80 1,100.33 275307 8111/2005 INV002204 102794 REHRIG PACIFIC COMPANY DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,100.33 3,432.98 RECYCLING BINS 117612 KE60398 5952.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 275312 3,432.98 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 275308 8/1112005 102011 RIVER CITY JAZZ ORCHESTRA 179.36 LUMBER 8/10/2005 15:43:08 Page - 26 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH PARK DISTRIBUTION BUILDING MAINTENANCE RECYCLING 150.00 PERFORMANCE 8/17/05 117906 080105 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 275309 8/11/2005 118001 ROZEBOOM MILLER ARCHITECTS -INC 49,891.40 ARCHITECT/ENGINEERING FEES 117613 6 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES - 49,891.40 275310 8/11/2005 118611 RUSSELL, IRENE 712.96 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 117750 080305 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 712.96 275311 8/11/2005 118168 SCAN HEALTH INC. 1,100.33 AUGUST EMS SUPPORT 117907 INV002204 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,100.33 275312 8/11/2005 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 179.36 LUMBER 117751 40136803 1647.6577 LUMBER PATHS & HARD SURFACE 179.36 275313 8/11/2005 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. 510.54 CONTRACTED SERVICE 117555 8101344387 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 510.54 275314 8/11/2005 118614 SCOTT, LOLITA 49.00 TRIP REFUND 117752 080305 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS SENIOR CITIZENS 49.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 275315 8/11/2005 104239 SEAGER, KRISTI 125.00 PERFORMANCE 8/16105 125.00 CITY OF EDINA 8110/2005 15:43:08 Council Check Register Page - 27 8/11/2005 -- 8/1112005 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 117908 080105 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 275316 8/11/2005 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 103409 SHAMROCK GROUP COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 194.45 117675 45614 5320.6180 194.45 275317 8/11/2005 118612 SHORE GALLERIES, INC 374.00 TRAINING AMMO 117753 85166 1400.6104 374.00 275318 8/1112005 104786 SOUTHDALE PET HOSPITAL 158.22 VET VISIT 117754 154506 5410.6230 158.22 275319 8/11/2005 101002 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS INC 52.60 117475 168788 5842.5515 8,529.50 117476 168790 5842.5514 11.05 117477 168785 5822.5515 389.45 117492 168786 5822.5514 28.50 BEER 117676 168628 5430.5514 9,011.10 275320 8/11/2005 108553 SOUTHTOWN PLUMBING INC. 70.00 REPAIRS 117755 080205 5311.6180 70.00 275321 8111/2005 118378 SPANISH WINES IMPORTERS 788.04 117478 81076878 5842.5513 788.04 275322 8/11/2005 116682 SPECIALTY WINE a BEVERAGES 358.00 117479 3756 5862.5513 358.00 117849 3755 5822.5513 716.00 275323 8/1112005 101021 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC 146.90 PROPANE 117678 0419133038 1314.6406 146.90 275324 8/11/2005 116856 SPRINT CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL CONCESSIONS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER -YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION CITY OF EDINA 8/10/2005 15:43:08 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 28 8/1112005 -- 8/11/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,091.82 CDMA 117614 6/15-7/14 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,091.82 275325 8/1112005 101004 SPS COMPANIES 99.18 VALVE 117677 S1274884.001 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 123.19 WAX RINGS, SEATS 117756 S1275744.001 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 222.37 275326 8/1112005 103283 ST. CROIX RECREATION CO INC 1,602.83 DRINKING FOUNTAIN 117757 14403 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 1,602.83 275327 8/11/2005 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC 43.31 PAINT 117552 S139581 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 122.35 COUPLINGS 117553 SI39576 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 43.31 DISPLAYS 117554 S139571 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 197.95 REPAIRS 117758 SF02870 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 406.92 275328 811112005 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 1,944.16 WANT ADS 117615 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,944.16 275329 8111/2005 102069 STEPP MANUFACTURING CO. INC. 4.69 COUPLING 117557 30860 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 4.69 275330 8111/2005 101015 STREICHERS 166.78 GUN CLEANING SUPPLIES 117616 1273874 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 44.36 PATCHES 117617 1273951 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 102.77 TRAINING AMMO 117759 1283818 1400.6551 AMMUNITION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 313.91 275331 8/11/2005 117992 STRINGER BUSINESS SYSTEMS 33.65 COPIER MAINTENANCE 117618 1119922 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 33.65 275332 8111/2005 104349 STRUCTURED NETWORK SOLUTIONS 595.09 WIRING 117921 11858 5420.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CLUB HOUSE 595.09 275333 8/11/2005 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 8/10/2000 15:43:08 Page - 29 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 4.82 TIRE ACCESSORY 117559 10040459 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 4.82 275335 8/1112005 102140 SUN MOUNTAIN SPORTS INC. 73680 117679 85056 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 275336 8/11/2005 Council Check Register 111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC. 8/11/2005 -- 8/11/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 12.84 HANDLE 117558 399720 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 136.27 REPAIRS 117760 _ CTCS486563 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 149.11 275334 811112005 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. 118613 TAGLIA, LISA 8/10/2000 15:43:08 Page - 29 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 4.82 TIRE ACCESSORY 117559 10040459 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 4.82 275335 8/1112005 102140 SUN MOUNTAIN SPORTS INC. 73680 117679 85056 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES GRILL ART CENTER REVENUES EDINBOROUGH PARK EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PARK ADMIN. GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES 107.25 117480 380687 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 6,265.35 117481 380686 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 503.00 BEER 117682 18684 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 736.80 275336 8/11/2005 111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC. 35.00 CLEAN LINE 117680 357716 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 35.00 275337 8/11/2005 118613 TAGLIA, LISA 15.50 CLASS REFUND 117761 072705 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION 15.50 275338 8/1112005 101025 TAMARACK MATERIALS INC. 245.38 CEILING TILE 117762 7055630 -00 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 245.38 275339 8/11/2005 101326 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO 35.16 FUSES, BULBS 117560 47091 -00 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 11.97 LICENSE LAMP PLUGS 117763 47091 -01 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 47.13 275340 8/11/2005 118370 THOMPSON, NICHOLAS 603.50 INTERNSHIP 117909 080805 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 603.50 275341 8/11/2005 101034 THOMSEN & NYBECK 23,397.74 PROSECUTING 117619 3743- 056001B 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 835.36 117681 13376 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 24,233.10 275342 8/11/2005 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY GRILL ART CENTER REVENUES EDINBOROUGH PARK EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PARK ADMIN. GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES 107.25 117480 380687 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 6,265.35 117481 380686 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 503.00 BEER 117682 18684 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL CITY OF EDINA 8/10/2005 15:43:08 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page- 30 8/11/2005 — 811112005 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 587.50 BEER 117683 381584 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 7,463.10 275343 8111/2005 117100 TIME WARNER CABLE 99.95 AUGUST 117684 AUGUST SERVICE 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 99.95 275344 8/11/2005 101474 TITLEIST 253.80 GOLF BALLS 117685 2521403 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 253.80 275345 8/11/2005 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 1,475.03 WELDING GAS PROGRAM 117561 367413 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,475.03 275346 8/11/2005 104064 TRANS UNION LLC 12.31 BACKGROUND CHECK 117621 07552209 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 12.31 275347 8/11/2005 102686 TREASURER -STATE OF MINNESOTA 438.00 LICENSING FEE 117910 080405 1470.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 438.00 275348 8111/2005 101042 TRIARCO 89.48 117686 490272 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 89.48 275349 8/11/2005 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE 181.00 DOOR HARDWARE 117764 124038 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 181.00 275350 8/11/2005 103981 TWIN CITY OFFICE SUPPLY INC. 153.30 117687 467813 -0 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 153.30 275351 8/11/2005 102255 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO 142.00 OXYGEN 117911 838480 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 142.00 275352 8/11/2005 101049 UHL COMPANY 149.00 SERVICE CONTRACT 117562 16081 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 149.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/11/2005 -- 8/11/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 275353 8/11/2005 103248 ULLRICH, CINDY 10000 UNIFORM PURCHASE 117765 080405 5620.6201 LAUNDRY 100.00 . CLEANING SUPPLIES 144.74 CLEANING SUPPLIES 5320.5510 275354 8/11/2005 101053 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY 8/11/2005 5311.6511 101055 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 12.57 ROD CLAMPS 117563 391016 1646.6406 148.03 LABELING TOOL 117563 391016 5912.6406 101.12 MULTITESTER 117564 391007 5912.6406 102.56 GROUND RODS 117564 391007 1646.6406 837.18 LIGHTING 117565 381369 1322.6530 1.201.46 36.68 TOILET PAPER 275355 8/1112005 118617 UNITED HC INS. CO 849.15 39.21 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 117766 ROBERT ANDERSON 1470.4329 39.21 424.25 CONCESSION PRODUCT 117767 33519776 275356 8/11/2005 118221 UNITED HEALTHCARE 454.08 CLEANING SUPPLIES 117767 14474 OVERPAYMENT - ERAZMUS 117622 OVERPAYMENT 1470.4329 1190.6104 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS AMBULANCE FEES AMBULANCE FEES CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 144.74 CLEANING SUPPLIES 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 275357 8/11/2005 5311.6511 101055 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 375.00 ASSESSING CLASS 117922 080805 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 375.00 275358 8/1112005 101908 US FOODSERVICE INC 29.69 TOILET PAPER 117688 33514446 36.68 TOILET PAPER 117689 33514452 849.15 CONCESSION FOOD 117690 33517816 424.25 CONCESSION PRODUCT 117767 33519776 454.08 CLEANING SUPPLIES 117767 33519776 1,793.85 275359 8/11/2005 .101058 VAN PAPER CO. 117,15 117482 593080 581.70 PAPER SUPPLIES 117483 593093 239.42 BAGS 117484 .593081 971.55 117691 593126 211.67 PLATES, UTENSILS 117768 593573 2,121.49 275360 811112005 106308 VEITH, MICHELLE 1190.6104 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS AMBULANCE FEES AMBULANCE FEES CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 8/10/200....,:43:08 Page - 31 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE - BUILDINGS BUILDINGS BUILDING MAINTENANCE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ASSESSING POOL OPERATION POOL OPERATION POOL CONCESSIONS POOL CONCESSIONS POOL OPERATION 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON OCCUPANCY GRILL CENT SVC PW BUILDING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8111/2005 -- 8/1112005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 186.44 CAMP SUPPLIES 117912 05MV02 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 135.96 CAMP SUPPLIES 117913 05MV01 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/1012005 15:43:08 Page - 32 Business Unit ADAPTIVE RECREATION PLAYGROUND & THEATER 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING CITY HALL GENERAL PARKING RAMP SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET GENERAL ADMISSIONS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES DUE FROM HRA GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 322.40 275361 8111/2005 101610 VERI20N DIRECTORIES CORP. 14.00 PHONE BOOK ADVERTISING 117485 390010054299 5822.6122 14.00 PHONE BOOK ADVERTISING 117485 390010054299 5842.6122 14.00 PHONE BOOK ADVERTISING 117485 390010054299 5862.6122 42.00 275362 8/1112005 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 44.99 LAMPS 117566 15020568 -00 1551.6406 767.50 LIGHTING 117566 15020568 -00 1375.6406 812.49 275363 8/11/2005 118615 WARE HOUSE 4.46 DAILY ADMISSION REFUND 117772 072805 5300.2039 68.54 DAILY ADMISSION REFUND 117772 072805 5301.4541 73.00 275364 8111/2005 100183 WASHINGTON COUNTY 100.00 WARRANT - CERVANTIS 117623 103023118 1.000.2055 100.00 _ 275365 8/11/2005 103466 WASTE MANAGEMENT - SAVAGE MN 2,785.32 REFUSE 117624 3213853 - 2282 -1 4095.6103 297.56 ROLLOFF 117625 3221629 - 2282 -5 5511.6182 3,011.01 REFUSE 117626 3220774 - 2282 -0 4095.6103 6,093.89 275366 8/11/2005 118616 WEAVER, JAN 216.00 CLASS REFUND 117773 072705 5101.4607 216.00 275367 8/11/2005 103515 WELLS FARGO BANK MINNESOTA 750.00 CUSTODY FEE 117627 3198103 1000.1303 750.00 275368 8/11/2005 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 828.65 117486 120571 -00 5862.5513 48.00- 117487 120536.00 5822.5513 660.65 117488 121029 -00 5862.5513 ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/1012005 15:43:08 Page - 32 Business Unit ADAPTIVE RECREATION PLAYGROUND & THEATER 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING CITY HALL GENERAL PARKING RAMP SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET GENERAL ADMISSIONS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES DUE FROM HRA GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING CITY OF EDINA 8/10/2005 15:43:08 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 33 8/11/2005 8/11/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 812.65 117489 120935 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,253.95 275369 8/11/2005 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 992.45 117490 130589 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 580.75 117850 131215 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,168.80 117851 131216 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 773.45 117852 131217 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,515.45 275370 8/11/2005 112954 WISCONSIN TURF EQUIPMENT CORP. 33.17 SEAL KIT 117567 517210 -000 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 97.32 STRONG ARM KITS 117775 516785 -000 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 130.49 275371 8/11/2005 101082 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY 187.48 GOLF BALLS 117692 126903 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 65.58 GOLF BALLS 117693 126683 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 254.33 TEE MAT 117694 126365 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 507.39 275372 8/11/2005 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 761.00 117491- 167105 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 761.00 275373 8/11/2005 101726 XCEL ENERGY 2,312.37 51- 6840050 -6 117914 36051221 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER 25,368.12 51- 4888627 -1 117915 36389969 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 27,680.49 275374 8/11/2005 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 125.05 PARK & REC. COPIER 117628 011395857 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 26.00 BLDG. COPIER 117629 011395856 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 302.66 ADMIN. COPIER 117630 011063772 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 453.71 275375 8/11/2005 101091 ZIEGLER INC 345.00 GENERATOR 117631 E3809717 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 345.00 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals 763,133.61 R55CKREG LOG20001; CITY OF EDINA 8/10/2005 15:43:08 Council Check Register Page - 34 8/11/2005 — 8/11/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Check Total 763,133.61 Total Payments 763,133.61 R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 8/11/2005 - 8/1112005 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 433,174.58 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 2,413.65 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 11,291.54 05100 ART CENTER FUND 4,229.46 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 3,727.60 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 12,393.19 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 26,304.22 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 8,295.30 05800 LIQUOR FUND 243,896.09 05900 UTILITY FUND 11,216.36 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 1,994.08 05950 RECYCLING FUND 3,432.98 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 764.56 Report Totals 763,133.61 8/10/2005 1 ti:07:28 Page - 1 We confirm to the beet of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing po)icies and ,�,� . W2�1 procedu �1NA ^� �l I ` Y 0w e ' v � ! REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item VIII.A. From: DEB MANGEN Consent CITY CLERK Information Only ❑ Date: AUGUST 16, 2005 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: PETITION RECEIVED ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion RECOMMENDATION: Refer petition received for approval in conjunction with Agenda Item V.A., Award of Bid for Schaefer Circle Roadway and Utility Improvements - Contract No. ENG.05 -12. I �' 11.1A. Iltl o @ ��, City of Edina, Minnesota CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 � (612) 927 -8861 • (612) 927 - 7645 -FAX • (612) 9271.5461 -TDD PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ SANITARY SEWER D T :, L - ❑ WATERMAIN ❑ STREET LIGHTING f �I CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑PERMANENT STREET ❑OTHER: SURFACING WITH The bo,lvw re sent �r.�Pp���CURB AND GUTTER "V& 10-r +E 7� adAtd if, +he- Schcae4er Ctrcle rccevS +rV-gA' ON pra pct �Cb..tr.�� �It. is -ti� antler +hQ cE► k,4Tcry +iw.'t. ;t w;11 be Paid for •%•t vi- -k►r C:* S�rrt. w�irr ui. l fu.hj) aVj Will To the Mayor and ity Council: m+ b� d, -�� �sses�d 1� 4)l,e udj�,-«a+ r,s %�1�rts The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. SGhae�r Ci rda between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME AIM)P"S ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS and t,,A, .� G.1 -de -Sac and ADDRESS and ADDRESS and ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE TWXd 1 OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S (PRINTED) PHONE :his petition was circulated by: NAME ADDRESS c6� rt I 1�2 •) ;'Z - 0 .Sc C (ter iv Z12 ,35'I — PHONE -q'-:�A There is space for more signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages. SEPTEMBER ,9W PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE wi; � J � � OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) C. 411tson Qu�!d Gl` PROPERTY ADDRESS G OWNER'S PHONE 9SA- 9,�, 70� a��. -X30 -900. "I 0 APPROVED MINUTES OF THE Edina Transportation Commission Thursday, June16, 2005 Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Community Room MEMBERS PRESENT: Fred Richards, Marie Thorpe, Jean White, Warren Plante, Joni Kelly Bennett, Les Wanninger MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: Steve Lillehaug, Sharon Allison L Call to Order Chair Richards called the meeting to order. fl. New Business a. In- street Pedestrian Crossing Sign Policy Lillehaug said there have been numerous requests made for in- street pedestrian crossing signs like the ones being used at 50th & France. He developed a draft policy, incorporating both federal and state guidelines for the ETC's consideration and recommendation for the City to use as a guide to determine where and when they are placed. Lillehaug said there are approximately 50 locations where the signs could be used. The City currently owns 10 signs and the purchase price is $200 /ea. Using 10 signs on a rotational basis in lieu of installing signs at all locations will help avoid overuse of the sign, which leads to less effectiveness. Lillehaug proposed putting the signs in key locations on a rotational schedule. Locations would be determined based on pedestrian volume, next to schools, parks, etc. as stated in the draft policy. After discussion, the ETC recommended revising the policy to include using the signs on a rotational basis, including using the signs during the winter also. b. Transportation Commission Membership — (Student Membership) Lillehaug said the Council has discussed adding a student to the ETC and the current ordinance does allow for this; however, a student membership is in lieu of a regular membership, which is currently full with the exception of a Planning Commissioner. The ETC agreed that the student would have the same voting rights as other members. Richards made a motion to request that the Council increase the ETC's membership to 9 to include a student and to appoint a student, and a Planning Commission member to fill the vacant membership. Motion was seconded by Dovolis. Motion carried. 1 Ill. Old Business a. Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan (NTMP): Score and Rank West 70th Street Using the NTMP ranking process, Lillehaug reported that West 70th Street is ranked second to the high school area. Richards said he thought West 70th Street would be addressed in the Southdale study but this does not appear to be the case. Bennett noted that the consultant's report did mention that current land use on West 70th Street is inconsistent with development. Being keenly aware of the issues, three different approaches were suggested by the Commission to begin addressing them: i. Let the neighborhood suggest what they would like to see done; ii. The City should identify some solutions before involving the neighborhood; iii.Give the neighborhood some solutions and cost analysis and allow them to respond. Lillehaug said staff is currently looking at Wooddale and West Shore Drive. The CI P warranted. Lillehaug said ideally West 70th three -lane road based on traffic volumes. I enforcement could be stepped up to deal wit is mainly congestion. Richards said the ET 70th Street. the warrants for a new traffic signal at includes this project, if a traffic signal is Street should be four lanes or a modified n the meantime, he suggested that police h speeding, but Richards said the problem C should become the petitioners for West Bennett made a motion to hold a public meeting that would include residents east and west of Hwy. 100 and up to France Avenue. Dovolis amended the motion to include identifying some solutions for residents and inviting them to suggest other solutions. This motion was not seconded or voted on. During discussion about how to handle West 70th Street and other areas that are already scored and ranked, Thorpe noted that the ETC had already selected the areas to focus on and they are becoming side - tracked again by including yet another area. It was noted that NE Edina was selected as priority #1, but the Council does not have funding to initiate a traffic study. The question was raised about whether or not they should move on to an area that would fit into staffs schedule and where funding is not such an issue. Dovolis said the Commission would languish, if according to Council, funds were not available for the projects they've identified as priorities. He said even if there isn't a perfect solution, the ETC should continue forward and get the residents involved so that they can help to motivate Council to provide funding. Thorpe made a motion to continue working on NE Edina. This motion was not seconded or voted on. Dovolis estimated that the NE Edina study cannot be done for at least the next six months and the high school area is at least three months away, therefore, he sees no reason why they cannot begin working on West 70th. He said they should identify three 2 r possible solutions, present them to the public for their input and then have staff determine what can be done. Lillehaug said he would like to meet with City Manager Hughes and City Engineer Houle to discuss the shift in priority and his preference would be to identify the problems and possible solutions before holding a public meeting. Wanninger said they should do a formal report to the Council outlining the traffic studies that have been done and the issues discovered and let the Council decide. He said West 70th is clearly overburden with traffic and the ETC was appointed by Council to deal with these issues. Wanninger made a motion to write a formal report to the Council outlining issues and recommended solutions. Dovolis made a motion for staff to prepare a schedule and resources for the three top ranked areas and a report to Council outlining what has been done to date and things still to be done. The report is to be done within the next 30 days for the Commissioners review. Wanninger's and Dovolis' motions were combined. Seconded by White. Motion carried. IV. Handouts a. Correspondence eDan Atkins E -mail regarding the High School area. The ETC is aware of the issues in this area and is working to address them. *Eric Isakson E -mail regarding State Fair parking at Southdale (from Commissioner White) — The closest State Fair parking for Edina' residents is Eden Prairie and the Mail of America for 2005 State Fair. Commissioner White said planning would begin fairly soon for the 2006 State Fair and she would like to see about parking at Southdale. Richards said it is his understanding that the businesses at Southdale did not want State Fair parking there. V. Approval of Minutes Wanninger moved to approve the minutes of May 19, 2005. Seconded by Plante. Meeting adjourned. The next meeting is scheduled for July 21St, 6:00 -8:00 p.m., in the Community Room, City Hall. 3 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD TUESDAY, JULY 12, 2005, AT 7:00 P.M. EDINA CITY HALL — MAYOR'S CONFERENCE ROOM 4801 WEST 50TH STREET MEMBERS PRESENT: Marie Thorpe, Lou Blemaster, Karen Ferrara, Arlene Forrest, David Runyan, Bob Kojetin and Ian Yue MEMBERS ABSENT: Gary Nyberg STAFF PRESENT: Joyce Repya, Associate Planner OTHERS PRESENT: Robert Vogel, Heritage Preservation Consultant Gene Haugland, Edina Theater Building Owner I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: Member Ferrara moved for approval of the minutes from the June 14, 2005 meeting. Member Yue seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. II. EDINA THEATER SIGN — LANDMARK DESIGNATION: Planner Repya reminded the Board that at their last meeting they had agreed that the Edina Theater sign without the marquee was worthy of heritage landmark designation. Consultant Vogel provided the Board with the required nomination study and proposed plan of treatment. The nomination study explains the history of the art deco theater sign as well as its landmark significance as an art object. The proposed plan of treatment uses the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties as the authoritative guide. The plan consists of the following six guidelines specifically tailored to the preservation requirements of the Edina Theater sign: #1 The Edina Theater sign will be recognized as a work of public art that is important to the cultural life of the city as a whole. #2 While the historical significance of the sign is related to its specific location at the site of the Edina Theater, the existing theater building is not a primary heritage preservation resource. However, in its present condition the theater building makes a Minutes — July 12, 2005 Edina Heritage Preservation Board positive contribution to the historic character of the sign; therefore, its historical value and preservation potential also needs to be recognized and respected. #3 The owner will be expected to apply measures to sustain the existing form, integrity, and material of the theater sign, including repair and stabilization work where necessary as well as ongoing maintenance. Repair and replacement of deteriorated features should be based on accurate duplications of the original, based on historical, pictorial, or physical evidence. #4 The distinguishing original qualities and character of the sign should not be destroyed. The removal or alteration of any historic fabric or decorative detailing should be avoided whenever possible. #5 Every reasonable effort shall be made to preserve the theater sign in place without altering its height, setback, or viewshed. #6 Demolition of all or part of the existing theater building will require a Certificate of Appropriateness. The city will not issue any permit for demolition until the Heritage Preservation Board approves a redevelopment plan that preserves and protects the historic sign in a manner consistent with its landmark status. If the sign must give way to new development, it may be relocated to a new site with compatible surroundings where it can be preserved and rehabilitated. The guidelines were crafted after a meeting with the building owner, Gene Haugland, however, Mr. Haugland may at this time choose to fine tune the plan. Mr. Haugland was present to address the proposed landmark designation of the theater sign. He explained that when he purchased the theater 60% of the sign bulbs were non functional. The sign was rusted and in need of extensive repairs, not to mention a new coat of paint. Several years ago, an extensive renovation project was undertaken. The sign has sported several different color combinations since 1934; however the current colors were researched and found to be consistent with the original theater sign. Not only were the bulbs repaired and replaced, but the original sequencer was repaired to provide the cascading of lights in the starburst and down the side of the sign. Mr. Haugland pointed out that he and his wife were honored to receive the 2003 Heritage Award for their work in restoring the sign; and agreed that the landmark designation .of the sign is a natural next step. Mr. Haugland did share that over the years he has had some unpleasant experiences in other communities when dealing with heritage preservation regulations imposed upon his projects. He added that he appreciated Edina's approach whereby the property owner is a team, player. Mr. Haugland offered several corrections to the history section of the nomination study. Addressing the plan of treatment, he indicated that of the six guidelines, he would like three of them to be reworded: 2 Minutes — July 12, 2005 Edina Heritage Preservation Board #4 "The distinguishing original qualities and character of the sign should not be destroyed. The removal or alteration of any historic fabric or decorative detailing should be avoided whenever possible. Mr. Haugland asked that the work "original" be replaced with "existing" in light of the fact that the sign is not the original sign, but was rebuilt after the tornado in the 1980's. Board members agreed with the correction. #5 "Every reasonable effort shall be made to preserve the theater sign in place without altering its height, setback or view shed. Mr. Haugland pointed out that he would like the work "Every" removed. Board members agreed. He added that he found the protection of the "view shed" to be interesting since it is already compromised from several vantage points, however he did not ask for removal of that word. #6 "Demolition of all or part of the existing theater building will require a Certificate of Appropriateness. The city will not issue any permit for demolition until the Heritage Preservation Board approves a redevelopment plan that preserves and protects the historic sign in a manner consistent with its landmark status. If the sign must give way to new development, it may be relocated to a new site with compatible surroundings where it can be preserved and rehabilitated." Mr. Haugland stated that this point causes him the greatest concern. While only the theater sign is being designated a landmark, this point requires that the Heritage Preservation Board approve the plans for a new building in the event that a redevelopment project is proposed. Consultant Vogel explained that the intent of this point is to ensure that if the building is to be razed, that plans are identified to protect the sign. Mr. Haugland opined that the last sentence does a good job of protecting the sign without holding the owner hostage to the Board for approval of a new development. Board members agreed with Mr. Haugland that the last sentence met the intention of protecting the sign. Responding to a question regarding the timeline for the landmark designation process, Consultant Vogel explained that once the HPB moves to recommend the landmark designation of theater sign, the nomination study and plan of treatment will be submitted to the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office for their comment; they have a 60 daytime period to respond. After the State has-responded, the designation report will go to the Planning Commission for their comments and lastly to the City Council for the final review and action. If the proposed designation is sent to the State by the end of July (they usually take the full 60 day period to respond), the Planning Commission would hear the request in October. City Council action would then follow in November. 3 Minutes — July 12, 2005 Edina Heritage Preservation, Board Following a brief discussion, Member Blemaster moved approval of the Edina Theater Sign heritage landmark nomination study and plan of treatment as amended. Member Kojetin seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. COMPREHENSIVE HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN: Concepts and Format Consultant Vogel explained that in September 2004, the HPB started working on a comprehensive historic preservation plan to help city decision makers (HPB, City Council, Planning Commission and administrative staff) plan for the wise use of the City's significant heritage resources. Thus far, the framework for the plan has been created, the "Mission" was agreed upon, and work had begun on the "Vision" section. Work on the. plan was put on hold due to the large turnover in Board membership. With five new members now on board, this is a perfect time to bring everyone up to speed with what has been accomplished thus far, and continue working on the plan. Mr. Vogel pointed out that with the use of a comprehensive heritage plan, structure is provided that allows a board to get out of the reactionary mode by establishing goals and objectives. As an introduction to the newest members, Mr. Vogel offered the following 5 Basic Concepts of Historic Preservation: 1. Historic buildings and sites are scarce and non - renewable cultural resources and should be treated as critical assets for community development. 2. Historic Preservation is an important public service and a legitimate responsibility of city government. 3. Not everything that is old is worth preserving: protective measures should focus on significant historic resources. 4. Saving significant historic resources for the benefit of future generations is always in the public interest. 5. Effective historic preservation policies are those which create a partnership between owners of historic properties and city government. Mr. Vogel elaborated on each concept, pointing out that by creating a comprehensive preservation plan, the historic preservation work of the city can be structured in a way that the identified goals and objectives are met in a time and cost efficient manner. Member Blemaster thanked Mr. Vogel for clearly explaining the concepts, pointing out that the exercise has helped her understand the direction the Board is headed with the proposed plan. A brief discussion followed. No formal action was taken. 4 t Minutes — July 12, 2005 Edina Heritage Preservation Board IV. INTERLACHEN RECREATIONAL TRAIL SURVEY: Consultant Vogel explained that the City of Edina Engineering Department is proposing an eight foot wide recreational trail on the north side of Interlachen Boulevard from the corner of Interlachen and Vernon Avenue, running west to Blake Road where it will continue northward on the east side of Blake Road into Hopkins. Because federal funds will be involved with this project, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn /DOT) has determined that the City must survey 3 properties abutting the proposed trail which they have determined might be eligible for National Register of Historic Places and could possibly be affected by the trail. The City may either hire their own consultant or have Mn /DOT undertake the work. The City Engineer, Wayne Houle will be in charge of this project and the survey funds will come out of his budget. Engineer Houle met with the consultants for the project, SRF Consulting Group, Mr. Vogel and Planner Repya to discuss the project relative to the heritage preservation ramifications. Mr. Vogel indicated that his firm would be interested in doing the survey work. The project would not require approval from the HPB, however the information collected particularly regarding the Interlachen Country Club would be beneficial to meeting the goals identified in Section IX. (Country Club and Parks: The Heritage of Recreation, Leisure and Sport) of the Historic Context Study. While the Country Clubs are not high, on the priority list for research, it only makes sense for the City to take advantage of an opportunity to ensure that the historic information required for the project can also meet our Historic Context goals. Mr. Vogel added that depending how the study goes, he may ask for volunteers from the HPB to assist in the "on the ground" research. He further explained that the construction of the trail is tentatively proposed for 2007. He would hope to commence the necessary field work research this September through October. Board members agreed that it was an interesting project. Mr. Vogel stated that he would keep them advised of the progress. No formal action was taken. V. NEXT MEETING DATE: August 9, 2005 VII. ADJOURNMENT: 8:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, J6yC4&Re-pya 5 N -1 r August 4, 2005 City of Eal11a Ms. Frieda Leinger 4226 Valley View Road Edina, MN 55424 RE: Valley View Road Reconstruction Dear Ms. Leinger: This letter is written in regards to two issues that you have regarding reconstruction of Valley View Road. These two issues involve the removal of a parking bay and access to your back yard via a rock garden along your northerly property line. After reviewing these two issues I offer the following: Removal of the Parking Bay: The Edina City Council in 1999 adopted a policy to remove parking bays that are located within City right -of -ways when those particular streets are being redeveloped. Based on this policy, all of the existing parking bays were removed from this right - of -way. This policy does not prohibit you from paving a turn - around pad outside of the right -of -way on your property. I've included an example or where you could locate this area below: City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 Page 2 4226 Valley View Road August 4, 2005 Access to rear yard: I understand that you feel access to your rear property, along the northerly property line, has been diminished due to the design of the new roadway. The roadway / sidewalk along this area have been lowered to accommodate new roadway design standards. However, preconditions prohibited the direct access from the south to this rock garden due to the fire hydrant along with an adjacent lilac bush, see photos. I would assume that you accessed this rock garden by walking around these two objects and gaining access from the driveway to the north. Before photo Before photo The fire hydrant was replaced with the replacement of the entire watermain system. Staff has indicated to you that lilac bushes will be planted to the east of the fire hydrant, see photo. Staff will attempt to reduce the grade difference of the rock garden. However, to make this area level would require the reconstruction of the adjacent wood retaining walls. It is my opinion that if this area is used for access to the rear yard that a hard surface be constructed to reduce the possibility of tripping within the rock garden; the funding for this would be at your expense. After photo am also available to meet with you to discuss these issues, please contact me at 952 - 826 -0443 if you would like to schedule a meeting. Sincerely, a4A�;/ Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer C: Gordon Hughes — City Manager Mayor and City Council . p G o Le 0 REPORURECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: GORDON L. HUGHES CITY MANAGER Date: AUGUST 2, 2005 Subject: ABOVE GROUND To HRA SWIMMING POOLS Agenda Item Consent ❑, Information Only Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion INFORMATION /BACKGROUND : At the August 2, 2005, meeting, Council Member Swenson inquired about rules and regulations with respect to above ground swimming pools. As I mentioned, this issue was' last considered by the Council approximately two years ago. Enclosed for your review are the Council Minutes and staff reports related to 'this issue. On that occasion, the Council elected not to change current rules and regulations regarding above ground pools. 0 r L)7 11 49jN�,l� o e REPORT /RECOMMENDATION lees To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # Mc. From: Steve A. Kirchman Consent Only ❑ ❑ Building Official Information Date: October 29, 2003 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Discussion of City ordinance Action ❑ Motion prohibiting above - ground swimming pools. ❑ Resolution Tim and Judy Chirpich. 5601 McGuire Rd. ❑ ordinance 5� Discussion Recommendation: Staff recommends City Code prohibition on above - ground swimming pools remain unchanged. Other referenced play structures are a separate issue. Info /Background: The Construction Board of Appeals decided they didn't have the authority to grant a variance allowing an above - ground swimming pool that is specifically prohibited by the City Code. The attached memorandum from the City attorney supports the Board's position. The Board expressed concern that the ordinance prohibiting above - ground pools has not been reviewed since it passage in 1979, and requests the City Council review and discuss the ordinance. Attachments: 10/10/02 appeal letter with submitted pictures 8/25/03 staff report with 8/19/03 Sanitarian memo and pictures 9/3/03 Construction Board of Appeals meeting minutes 9/29/03 staff report with 9/5/03 Fire Chief memo 9/29/03 Construction Board of Appeals meeting minutes 10/23/03 Construction Board of Appeals memo 10/24/03 City Attorney memo Neighbor responses(2) ECC 450.06, Subd. 11 G:\ ConstBd\Appeals\BD03- 006,CBA03- 01,5601 McGuireRd\Mpt- council Pete and Judy Chirpich 5601 McGuire Road. Edina, MN 55439 October 10, 2003 Debra Mangen, City Clerk City of Edina 4801 West 50' Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Construction Board of Appeals File # C8A03 -01 Dear Ms. Mangen: ��NA CI iY ti Orr �33 A -2003 8Y F�Ve�o We are appealing the Construction Board of Appeal's ( "CBA ') decision dated September 30, 2003, denying a variance to city code #450.06 regarding above ground swimming pools. Overview This case addresses the acceptability of a toddler pool purchased at a Target store in Edina. The pool is soft - sided, 18' in diameter, 25.5" deep, holding approximately 4,000 gallons of water which is passed through a continuously running filter. Edina Code #450.06 prohibits any above ground pool that is 24" deep or greater. The code does not prohibit, limit the size of, or in any other way regulate above ground pools that are less than 24" deep. In short, this case is about 1.5" of water. Please take a moment to read the copy of my original letter of appeal to the CBA regarding this issue. (Exhibit A) Aesthetics The ordinance prohibiting above ground swimming pools was adopted back in 1979 for purely aesthetic reasons as stated in David Velde's memorandum to the CBA, dated August 19, 2003. (Exhibit B) "Aesthetically appealing" is tied to a community's values and meant something different in 1979 than what we consider now. Edina residents strive to give opportunities for children to succeed, and one way to support this is to start them off with recreational equipment that builds this confidence. This is why we now see large trampolines and towering play sets in backyards all over the city. I have enclosed photos (Exhibits C1 -C6) which were recently taken within a one mile radius of our home showing such large trampolines and play structures that also would have been considered aesthetically unappealing back in 1979. We believe that our toddler pool is no more unsightly than the towering play sets or trampolines which have proliferated in recent years. I A , t 1 b: t .a ® Now, consumer demand has led to the introduction of these soft -sided toddler pools which are large enough for kids to gain confidence in the water, not dust cool off on a hot day. For example, in a period of less than six weeks, our five year old son went from scared of the water to full submersion and a total comfort level. This progress has shown in up in his swimming lessons taken at the Edina Community Center. Our son now lives for his pool. The appealing nature of the pool is also reflected by the draw it has become for family, friends and neighboring children with whom we frequently shared it. In short, aesthetically appealing no longer exists as a valid reason to not allow these toddler pools. As our culture changes and our desire to entertain and provide stimulating activities for our children in our own back yards changes, we need to update this code to accept and permit these off the shelf toddler pools in Edina. Health and Safety. At our first meeting with the Board on September 3, 2003, a majority of the members agreed that the prohibition of these types of toddler pools was outdated and needed to be revised; taking into consideration the health and safety issues that goes along with any pool use. One of the main concerns raised by the members was whether there would be a challenge posed to fire personal conducting a rescue from a pool of this kind. I have enclosed a picture of my son and me in our pool that clearly shows the ease of entering the pool without use of any impeding ladder or steps. (Exhibit D1 -D2) I am 5'4" and can easily get in or out of the pool without any problems. ® Our family is not against safety regulations that would include fences or chemical tracking in order to keep our children safe. We were not looking for a variance regarding this pool ordinance. We are requesting a city code change that would include some parameters that would allow these pools with appropriate safety and health regulations. We feel very strongly that a revision to this code section be considered. Respectfully, r i Ju and Pete Chirpich Edina Residents Attachments s �� .ci�ti"�afrr r'�'��t t+4,.+„ . ^ 1 `�T1.•�.a� �: al► i. �+� ;!s'� �� M JL ►. ,. �' � 1 Ri � r jr ♦_ �.. ~ ♦• �����' ♦. a� a � -.J `•� 1 � � .. - r � it r O ♦� n 1, �Y ,•�� � - r iC+1 ' 1 _ t 3 �l `` .--- •.- '�• -�"r-" i� - . _ .... '�' � A � �'dl ++�rN• ^TF a�' .o.J .�. � vt'�+sr" x rs:a' 1 � -- ._.. ...._ a:.. rr++ a.! mafssw�°'a��lR�„sr'''i4e.A_.�-� '•z���aM_mae� ®9tles E�,yasas�xx sriy: �.'3i 0 ,4,,✓w���':' .t rr fin. , ..f. __— ` _'� -. •` • J'+�" .• • 'ate••• �I ° ..+- •- '•"" "._.r �- yF V _ _ Sy'� t 8 � j• l� ' y�y � • ,i. .y,.' _a3 402 C ti 3,•+'� f h y '4 •• � f . •• / �i 1 • �' . ._ d• � yr, r 4'• LIEL via At WL fur OF �.�M� 1 � 5 °:,vim ` `'•� r;:,:�: � ' �'� _ - -�- �'. "�� s ,• � iii' ��a �� -1 t +, � �� � i! ... • � 1� � ' �C ! /`ttJ t f t 1. 4 i rl., ` 1 .. � e � ! yTC jt�� t tgd{'!j1,!+�+ �V�• ` "�1 rl �{,�' ��? ,I..� � 5. tat.,.,. >,+r� +.Scf. rt ���.,` '� -- .35 i' .j. Er i0�'+.k`. •��..IT- If Wyk �4•C :.gin .k f r • � � a:j � a. �1tp � c • i - i,? S �•! `t - r .+ . • .-� - �.. ' • .. y �lh . - �i' ' _ f.- .�.. -� sue,, � .Je � "._. .. . '_ J/ ; y ♦ y w - _ I � 6 � tee. ��- �rp�:: • /�,� ggsa'�`r .�fA _; _ .� ESP x'0.3✓ rW d r • r r®9�g9G8. -r�r ( e Irl.ir,••_ � C+ �C' ' �'3 . ; �l`rr,�r.l .. F� s P a+!c w, Tr �7': `'�:. °'� '°' ! J� �.. /. � eta• ,.� `L j yes' A�., ' a , .aS ��S,,frl�i��tEp`'i. `� r,y�� ai .� j� �•s� -J .. - �r�. s K sus,- '7y�����W����S¢'E S`• � � Y'e {• - �•.3 - 1?'>�'3. .. #mac - yi r•� x y" tS K e%,. ' -3.' ' ! ft '•r�. % _ ,,JJJaKKK�!"^"� _ a' �.. �,:y '� ., vi, r; k .i�- f� ..., ' i� ""�'• '� � Y : � Yom`' ''+�,1� 7 , . ti { - � � ,� � ~� r- o- ��y � � .l�wi it K - � wn•Y.>� '3� ��' ,Z , -F ' s. . _ _ t.. i ,� r � *rat A•.,vr'tf' f � ,; � ° F d vl- will y 1 • a r . t }3a";?P._ .'�?; oaf `�r:�rf.$3r" ..' - •. �'- ��.Y,,:'"'..n ,��%w:'�'t`s�,:,` r,.,�+�..i': �' .� _- •r � » j it lk jo. Ail 4.4 tl j it lk jo. Ail tl A! Pr_— P', "A M Y Wy We, V ir - 1 -I r ` C a .4 I " � • � _ ' ` -!�- � Imo___ -.�- -_ �� • EDINA CONSTUCTION BOARD OF APPEALS STAFF REPORT August 25, 2003 Case number: CBA03 -01 Appellant: Pete and Judy Chirpich 5601 McGuire Road Lot 6, Block 6, La Buena Vista Request: Variance for above ground swimming pool f Background An above ground pool was discovered in response to a complaint. The Health Department, which regulates pools, notified the Chirpichs of the prohibitions against above ground pools and their appeal rights on 6/10/03 (enclosure #1). The City received the Chirpichs appeal on 7/9/03 (enclosure #2). Appeal notice was published, sent to all property owners within 200' of the subject property and sent to the Chirpichs on 8/13/03. Issues /Analysis Edina City Code, Section 450.06, Subd. 11, (enclosure #3) prohibits above ground pools. Because they are specifically prohibited, no regulations exist in the City Code governing safety or sanitation issues related to above ground pools. Fencing, water quality, protection of the City water supply, electrical safety, ingress and egress, permitting and inspections, location on property and drainage are some issues to be considered in the installation and use of a swimming pool. Research into the history of this ordinance hasn't been helpful. I've enclosed copies of the meeting minutes relating to above ground pools (enclosure #4). There seems to have been discussion, but only the results are recorded. The enclosed memorandum from David Velde, City Sanitarian, discusses aesthetic and life safety issues related to above ground pools (enclosure #5). The Health Department, headed by Mr. Velde, administers swimming pool regulations. Pictures of the pool are included (enclosure #6) Staff Report, CBA03 -01 • August 25, 2003 Page 2 of 2 Conclusion/Recommendation • \J Based on potential issues associated with above ground swimming pools, staff does not support the request for variance. Enclosures: #1, 6/10/03 Dave Velde violation letter #2, 7/9/03 Chirpich appeals request #3, ECC, Sec 450 #4, Excerpts from Edina City Council minutes, 4/2/79, 4/16/79, 6/4/79, 6/18/79 #5, 8/19/2003 David Velde memorandum #6, pool pictures H: \ConstBd\Appeals\BD03 -06,CBA03 -01,5601 McGuire ® INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: STEVE KIRCHMAN, EDINA BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM: DAVID VELDE, EDINA HEAL'T'H DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: ABOVE GROUND SWIMMING POOLS DATE: 8/19/2003 CC: The City of Edina regulates residential swimming pools for health and safety reasons. In 1979, the Edina City Council adopted an, ordinance prohibiting above ground swimming pools. This prohibition was adopted for aesthetic reasons. Beyond the aesthetics of the above ground swimming pool, I believe that access to the swimming pool for life saving becomes more difficult due to the lack of decking around the above ground swimming pool. Furthermore, if one were to construct an elevated deck around the swimming pool, the deck would also obstruct access to the swimming pool. L] Ll� A e� Ala- n_. t wk n' • p,1( At ONO.a i yA6 n'o "ll ,, •�i :�` " -�aa „may. _- �„ _ .�� ..����,A:.,�"sn.�'� `i y *'^ _ s ME ,t..' •�� r�•'aa '� "�"`,�, �': ¢.x'" '.. *'.."i4q ;�w�""k ��' .cw -�'; . - �° . �. 'Fa Ta �y ,�*,1'$..r A +. ...: �5,'"v*. ,.A,.n<. € '+," � :�,. ., ,„,.,, `!°.. � y e."�� \,�iF. �'n $ - >... �. �ria�+!f - �� �b4' ,r vrf+YS�{:y` IN',$�. 2S;��g •�-'�' ,y,,. ....�^.,:• ` i, �. #&+x'0'L. 7 ♦ hy' 'i?qi: , '11,, `i^ � n. {A• � f �r.„ �t°7° ..• #�a +. .i °"!R.:., f�"!9 , +. �S,�,A.� s 'a. 1 , " "'ei�b,{.,s ,�a �,sa r P ¢` .,� h ' °.° ,`^"^,:,...,`.^" -��.._ �,.� a^,a� ' i'k, a oN9, ' _ `*�� •tt, °Yx+ � X .�;, $^ i .'I Mr`.:•1 3..� 3'1!a* �• i'�:'{ , *L' C °� te„°, •'�,.6r � „A' r °>r. .- `s . -� fX" ,:� '� - ". a -<'. � �� . SS"r.�" .�.,y �'9'a' ✓>R w'e�r.�'•a*+»„,u us �' h„,�n+ .qx "l.lY' �d' Kr. s�i,b - ,.,.t � t .,r -,. ,.- t 'irk a ,a..Ar'1t> 4 „ 1f- • "'.. -_' 4t..? v Its -+f ar � a.. , .,. `.. � ..� ,'C� i'� Y �� ,r '•.° t� ,3.•3l ui'! 1•fw, „, t�[,+.�.' '� � �.a 'I ' � •. L -�T �4�4 � fq. �� ��j �1t s�. � '"'rl�'; ��eq'tF * "efi7.e"�a” �`� �^ } �A�,•�s•��'r!� «'n �,ti � �°,ngla, x � ? r ne. q. f ~.7� : "3 =�' �" .: =fir « ,arti. ,�xF 9``vi. Y;'S� `. ..Fyn: .3 i x ,�a 'p'F *.�'r x � �wl e t In - z 3 z� ,:.kt- 'X ws . `ii.^„r`' ; x„.te�r ::'I `i"Y 1r"', ,.a g'`' �' +,,. ..3 ? .+ he,:.+v. ''•t_... �, ,., �• � . ,. �,, � � � � Nom: � u PON a ti:� ,.w'. : >•„ '5.., a ...�.�.""..."s .�,' . � ;,.� 4 �, S r.:; t 8t °�, '�,a+ Xai '. X`` SS"".+w ra� � h`QX¢ � � � �`= � SY fi� S � S , � ^; >R tz� �: ;; s tvv n t a v G . a � a ' , �:, z � `»s•�., `.+:�,: ��. ;N • Y k � a� , ti x r w f. n , U *, P, k1 Construction Board of Appeals Meeting Minutes September 3, 2003 7:00 AM, Edina City Hall Lower Level Conference Room Board members present: John Glover, Ed Noonan, Dave Fisher, Ron Clark, Quentin Collins Public attendees: Grant Malcom - 5609 McGuire Rd., 952- 941 -2651; Judy Chirpich - 5601 McGuire Rd., 952 -944 -1013; Gerald Robinson - 5600 700' St. W, 952- 941 -4655 Staff present: Dave Velde, Steve Kirchman, Bev Haw I. OPENING OF MEETING Mr. Kirchman opened meeting with a roll call and introduced the newest member, John Glover. Boardmember Glover gave a history of his experience and qualifications to serve on this Board. Mr. Kirchman explained that this Board meets only on an "as needed" basis, the last meeting was in 2000. II. ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN AND CO -CHAIR Discussion by members as to whom would be interested in Chairman position and what is . required of the Chairman. Boardmember Noonan made a motion to elect John Glover as Chairman. Motion seconded by Boardmember Clark, vote was unanimous to elect John Glover as Chairman. Chairman Glover suggests Boardmember Noonan as Vice Chair, Boardmember Noonan accepts, vote is unanimous to elect Boardmember Noonan as Vice Chairman. II. CBA03 -01: 5601 McGuire Rd — Appeal of Ordinance prohibiting above ground swimming pools. Chairman Glover states the purpose of the meeting is the case of Peter and Judy Chirpich and their appeal of the ordinance prohibiting above ground pools. Members have reviewed the staff report and two members of the board have visited the site. Mr. Kirchman stated that an above ground pool was discovered in response to a complaint, the Health Department, which regulates pools, notified the Chirpichs of the prohibitions in Edina against above ground pools and their appeal rights. The Chirpichs appeal was received on July 9, 2003. Notice was published and everyone within 200 ft was notified. Mr. Kirchman explained that the ordinance simply prohibits above ground pools, there is no discussion in the code about why. There are no rules in place to regulate them. Mr. Kirchman did do some research into when the ordinance was passed in 1979, and there are no verbatim minutes. The minutes simply noted that there was some discussion and that it was passed. There is an enclosed memo from Mr. Velde, the City Sanitarian that discusses what he believes to be the CBA minutes, 9/03/2003 Page 2 of 6 reasoning for the prohibition of above ground pools. Based on the ordinance the staff does not support the request for a variance. Chairman Glover requested opinions from neighbors present at meeting. Mr. Grant Malcom, a neighbor of the Chirpichs, did not understand why they should not be allowed to have the pool. Mr. Malcom stated that there was no reasoning for not allowing the pools when it was put in place back in 1979. Mr. Malcom stated that he has no objections to the pool, and, in fact, loves the pool. Boardmember Noonan raised the concern of no fencing around the pool and asked Mr. Malcom if that was a concern for him. Mr. Malcom replied that fencing was not a concern. Another neighbor, Mr. Robinson, stated that he had no objection to the pool at all and stated that since they have moved into their home they have allowed their 3 yr old daughter to frequently play in the pool. Mr. Robinson has no safety concerns regarding this pool and believes the design of this pool seems almost brilliant because it is a soft -sided pool which means it is easy for an adult to get in and push the sides down. They collapse right down and you can step right into it. The way it slopes up kids can't climb into the pool because they can't get a handhold. The depth is great for his 3 yr old, about 2 ft deep, so it is only chest deep allowing her to play and gain confidence in the water. Mr. Robinson.stated that he is not bothered by the fact that there is no fence surrounding the pool, however, if there were a requirement for a fence he would certainly understand that. Mr. Robinson suggested that perhaps the original ordinance was based upon esthetics back in 1979 but that things have changed as far as types of entertainment equipment. Back in 1979 people went to Sears and paid $50 fora swing set, now people are paying $4,000 on big play structures, there are trampolines that are 20 ft wide with netting that goes up 12 —15', people are doing sport courts. Values have shifted; people are putting a lot more emphasis on recreation and sports opportunities. This pool seems within a reasonable bounds,,its under 20' diameter, and its only 2' deep. Mr. Robinson maybe would be opposed if it were 40' long and 4' deep at which point he would recommend it be installed in- ground. This pool is only up temporarily due to the short swimming season, its great for the younger kids. Mr. Robinson stated that his 3 yr old was intimidated going to the public pool, its much more difficult to supervise the young children at the public pool, there is a lot of rough housing and older children around, whereas this pool is of tremendous benefit. Chairman Glover agreed that the ordinance does not clarify why above ground pools are not allowed. Chairman Glover said that he has looked at the pool and really could not see the objections to it. Chairman Glover stated that he has a trampoline in his backyard that is higher than this pool. When this ordinance was written 25 years ago there was no thought of trampolines. Boardmember Clark asked for an explanation of what defines a "special purpose" pool.. CBA minutes 9/03/2003 Page 3 of 6 Mr. Velde explained that it would be like a hot tub or a whirlpool. A "wading pool" is a pool that is less than 24" in depth and is constructed in the ground. Small plastic pools are not regulated, and can be any size if under 24" in depth. Boardmember Noonan questions what liability the City would have if something were to happen to a child in an allowed above ground pool without fencing or any other restrictions that we currently have on other in ground or indoor pools. Boardmember Noonan recounted a situation 3 or 4 years ago when he sat on a hearing regarding egress around a pool deck that was to narrow to get a health rescue stretcher by, and the positioning of the stairway railing, and the City was concerned over possibility of some liability. Boardmember Noonan raised the issue of any possible exposure that the City might incur as a result of the approval of this pool. Boardmember Noonan indicated that he did not feel as though he has enough information to make an adequate decision. Boardmember Noonan was a paramedic for Hennepin County and assisted on 6 drownings - 3 in outdoor pools and 3 in indoor bathtubs, and understands the potential dangers. Because of the lateness of the season could we consider tabling this issue until we could study it further and basically give them the right to keep the pool up for the rest of the season and by next spring have the information available and go through Council or staff to study this and make a decision that would be in effect for the next swimming season. Mr. Kirchman stated that one of the choices at this time would be to not take any action and ® refer it to the City Council for review and possibly changing the ordinance. If this appeal is denied they have the right to appeal. The pool would not be ordered to be removed until the appeal process has been completed. The Chirpichs can appear before the Council and try to get the ordinance changed. Mr. Robinson disagreed with the statement that if this pool were to be allowed then all above ground pools would need to be allowed and suggested that the staff would be required to set forth safety regulations and parameters. 'Mr. Robinson suggested that staff could do additional research and set forth regulations regarding depth, length, type of sides, .rescue accessibility. Mr. Robinson also recommended looking at ordinances from other cities. Chairman Glover stated that this Board does not have the authority to overthrow this ordinance, or even change this ordinance and approve this variance. Times have changed and what is backyard recreation is a lot different than it was 25 years ago. Chairman Glover suggested that although he personally had no problem with the pool, the Board can't change the ordinance. What we can do is take this issue to Council. Mr. Velde then addressed the 1979 decision to restrict above ground pools. At that time the City Council was not sure whether we should restrict above ground pools or not. The reason they held it over for one meeting was they wanted to get some press out to the public. There was an article written in the local paper and the public did not respond. Some council members did speak to people that they knew and some thought that the public did not want to see above ground swimming pools so the Council decided to keep the ordinance as it was and not to allow above ground swimming pools. CBA minutes 9/03/2003 Page 4of6 Chairman Glover stated that, in his opinion, the above ground pool prohibition was not related to health issues, but health issues need to be considered and should be put into any regulations which would be adopted. Issues of concern would be chlorine levels, PH balance, bacteriological counts and other issues that would be the same as owners of in ground pools. The pool owners would have some duties that they would have to live up to. Mrs. Chirpich agreed that these levels must be maintained or you will end up with a green pool that would not be safe. This ordinance does not regulate pools with a depth of less than 24 ". Mrs. Chirpich indicated that her pool is 25 Y2" deep. Chairman Glover questioned if this pool could have an overflow valve which would keep the depth under 24" and the Board could make a recommendation to the City at which time they could review the ordinance and determine restrictions and regulations. Boardmember Fisher said that he did not have a problem with this particular pool, however, this would raise the question of what would be allowed and what would not be allowed and that approving this pool would open a can of worms. Chairman Glover suggested that this ordinance would not be studied and changed before the next pool season. Boardmember Noonan is not comfortable with recommending a way around the interpretation of the ordinance as it stands now. The Board has specific choices to act on at this time. Boardmember Noonan asked staff that if the Board recommends the issue be referred to Council, would the staff agree to investigate on behalf of the Council and make a staff recommendation. Chairman Glover asked Mr. Velde if the Health Department does inspection of in ground swimming pools. Mr. Velde replied that we do a final inspection when they are installed but we do not do maintenance inspections. The only maintenance inspections that are done by the City are on public and semi - public pools such as apartment buildings, the aquatic center, the YMCA, that type of place. Mr. Velde indicated that there are over 500 private swimming pools in the City and we do not do maintenance inspections on them. The only issue on the books regarding in ground swimming pools is the one that was in question in 1979. That pool was partially above ground and they did finish off the grade around the entire pool so that it was below grade. That was the situation that caused the wording, "above ground" to be included in the ordinance. Mr. Robinson's suggested another option available to the Board. Instead of referring this issue to Council the Board could direct staff to further research above ground pools and report back with recommendations to be discussed and forwarded to Council. Chairman Glover discussed with Mr. Robinson the extent that this board could do further study and make recommendations to the Council. Chairman Glover suggests that a recommendation be made to request staff to revisit the issue, look at the issue again, and make another staff report. - la y GBA minutes 9/03/2003 ® Page 5 of 6 The current report was made by Mr. Velde but the recommendation to deny the ordinance came from Mr. Kirchman based on the facts of how the ordinance stands today. Boardmember Collins pointed out the ordinance is very clear, and even though we are considerate of this particular case, the ordinance is very straightforward and does not give us any "wiggle" room. Chairman Glover states that we can recommend that the staff look at the issue again, put it out for public comment, and consider recommending ordinance revisions to the Council. Boardmember Collins agreed that we are headed in the right direction. Mrs. Chirpich stated that she is hearing a degree of support to at least look at updating or changing the current ordinance. Mrs. Chirpich requested further consideration and study on the safety and esthetic issues and to consider a variance for this pool. Mrs. Chirpich also suggested that other backyard play sets, trampolines, hot tubs and additional play items are relatively new items and should also be looked at. Chairman Glover replied to Ms. Chirpich that the board would not be comfortable going to the ® Council to support this particular pool. particularly requesting a specific variance for their pool Ms. Chirpich responded that she was not particu y q g p but support to revise the City Code with different parameters regarding size, etc. and bring the City Code up to date with regard to all recreational equipment. Boardmember Noonan states that he has great confidence in the Board, the Council and the City staff; however, he does not feel that at this time the Board could grant a variance for this particular pool. Boardmember Noonan would recommend reexamining the ordinance, do further study and make recommendations to the Council. Examination of health and safety issues, fire department rescue issues, possible liability issues and possible insurance issues need further study to make an informed decision. Mr. Kirchman suggested that a motion be made to direct staff to make recommendations on possible changes to the ordinance and report back to the Board at the next meeting. The Council could always direct the board to further investigate. The staff will study health and safety issues and report to the board. This staff report will be distributed prior to the next scheduled meeting to give everyone an opportunity to review the recommendations. A motion to direct staff to do further study and report back to the board was made by Boardmember Noonan. The motion was seconded by Boardmember Fisher. No discussion. Chairman Glover called for a vote; the result was unanimous approval of this motion. Boardmember Noonan thanked Mrs. Chirpich for the opportunity to look into this issue. CBA minutes 9/03/2003 Page 6 of 6 Boardmember Fisher asked Mrs. Chirpich if the cover was not on the pool and the removable ladder was not in the pool and a 2 year old fell in, would the 2 yr old be able to get out? Mrs. Chirpich replied "no". Discussion closed and the residents left the meeting at this time. IV. CBA03 -02: 6301 Knoll Dr. S. - Edina City Code, Section 450.06, Subd 8, regulating pool ladders Mr. Kirchman stated. that the next meeting date would be set to discuss the requirement for a ladder in a pool. The approved plans for the pool required a ladder that was not installed. Boardmember Fisher suggested that homeowner just install the.ladder. Mr. Kirchman stated that homeowner did not want to do that. A final inspection for this pool has not been approved. V. NEXT MEETING.DATE AND AGENDA — Monday, September 22, 2003 7:00 A.M. The first possible date for the next meeting would be September 22, 2003 or anytime after that date. Staff report for the Chirpich appeal will be ready by that time. i 5 Boardmember Noonan requested an updated roster including cell phone numbers. Board members discussed issues that will be addressed in the staff report regarding above ground pools. Future issues that may need to be addressed would include trampolines, skateboards, rollerblades, hot tubs, swing sets, soccer goals and other recreational items. Boardmember Noonan made a motion to adjourn; Chairman John Glover seconded it. VI. ADJOURNMENT: 8:00 A.M. Respectfully submitted Steve A. Kirchman Board Secretary ✓-s Construction Board of Appeals Staff Report September 29, 2003 CBA03 -01 Peter and Judy Chirpich 5601 McGuire Road Lot 6, Block 6, La Buena Vista Request: A variance from Code Section 450.06, Subd 11, prohibiting above ground swimming pools Background• A soft -sided swimming pool was installed at 5601 McGuire Road. The swimming pool is located in the rear yard and rests on the ground. The swimming pool is designed to hold water to a depth of 30 inches. A notice was sent to the residents at 5601 McGuire Road instructing them to remove the above ground swimming pool pursuant to City Code Section 450.06, Subd. 11, which prohibits the installation of above ground swimming pools. The residents appealed the notice to remove the above ground swimming hpool Construction Board Construction Appeals and the appeal was heard on September 9, 2 of Appeals deferred action on the appeal and requested more information from staff regarding insurance, health and safety, and input from other swimming pool contractors. Issues /Analysis City Code Section 450 defines a swimming pool as "Any basin for holding water, designed for human use, with a water depth greater than 24 inches ". The subject swimming pool exceeds a water depth of 24 inches, therefore meets the definition of a swimming pool and must meet the requirements of Code Section 450. The Code requires the submission of construction plans and the issuance of a building permit prior to installing a swimming pool. The swimming pool was installed without plans or building permit. The Code expressly prohibits above ground swimming pools. The swimming pool is installed on the ground, above grade. The Code requires the installation of a fence around the swimming pool equipped with self- closing and self - latching gates. There is no fence around the swimming pool. OU The Code requires a four -foot wide, unobstructed deck around the swimming pool. There is no deck around the swimming pool for rescue purposes. A memorandum from Edina Fire Chief Marty Scheerer is attached expressing his concern about rescue operations involving above ground swimming pools. The Code requires a recirculation system consisting of pumps, piping, filters, skimmers, valves and disinfection equipment, which comply with the National Sanitation Foundation (NSF) Standard No. 50. The swimming pool has a pump and filter. The swimming pool does not have skimmers or disinfection equipment installed in the piping. It is not known if the pump and filter meet NSF Standard No. 50. A local swimming pool contractor indicated that owners of these soft -sided pools were seeking help from them in filter replacement and controlling water clarity. Model standards have been developed by the National Swimming Pool Institute (NSPI) for residential swimming pools, both in ground and above ground. There are no standards for soft sided above ground swimming pools. The City of Edina utilizes model standards, whenever possible, when adopting local Codes. The insurance industry was contacted for information about soft -sided above ground swimming pools. The company contacted did have fence requirements for swimming pools, including above ground swimming pools, but none for soft-sided portable swimming pools. Conclusion/Recommendation Soft-sided above ground swimming pools are a recent entry into the residential swimming pool market. Homeowners can purchase them off the shelf and install them in their back yard at a low cost. There are no national standards for design, operation and construction of these swimming pools and they may not have adequate filtration and circulation to maintain water quality. Gaining access to the swimming pool in .a rescue operation appears to be problematic due to the lack of a deck around the perimeter of the swimming pool. Staff recommends denial of the appeal based upon the fact that the swimming pool lacks a deck around the pool, there is no fence controlling access to the pool and there are no national standards available to evaluate the design, operation and construction of the swimming pool. Edina Eire Department City of Edina 6250 Tracy Avenue 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55436-2580 Edina, Minnesota 554241394 (952) 826.0330 (952) 927-8861 Fax (952) 826-0393 Fax (952) 826-0390 MEMORANDUM Date: September 5, 2003 To: David Velde, City Sanitarian From: Marty. Scheerer, Fire Chief Subject: Above ground swimming pools Mr. Velde, This letter is to follow up on our conversation regarding above ground swimming pools in the City of Edina. gP The Edina Fire department would not recommend the approval of above ground swimming pools in the city. Above ground pools pose. a significant challenge to Fire Department personnel when try to attempt a rescue from a pool. Rescuers need a large stable area to work from and to stage equipment. Any steps or ladders are also an impediment to any rescue efforts. The large soft -sided pools would also be difficult. to perform a rescue from due to the large volume ' of water that would rush at the fire personnel in a rescue attempt. Should you have any further questions, please contact me. • 8 CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING MINUTES SEPTEMBER 29, 2003 Board Members Present: Ron Clark, John Glover, Dave Fisher, Ed Noonan, Members Absent: Bruce Bermel, Quentin Collins Staff Present: Dave Velde, Steve Kirchman, Bev Haw Others Present: Mrs. JudZ Chirpich -5601 McGuire Rd, Mr-Gerald Robinson - 5600 70 St W I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: Chairman Glover stated he did not receive 9/3/03 minutes. Mr. Kirchman said that the minutes were mailed, but will be remailed and the Board can make any necessary changes. H. OLD BUSINESS: CBA03 -02: - 5602 McGuire Rd. - Edina City Code, Section 450.06 Subd 11, prohibiting above ground swimming pools Chairman Glover confirmed receipt of the staff report by Board members and Chirpichs and opened the issue the for discussion. Judy Chirpich brought up the concern about the difficulty of rescue from this pool. She had taken pictures of herself entering and exiting the pool but her printer did not work so she was unable to bring them. She stated that this is a 5000 - gallon toddler pool and in her opinion it is a very easy pool to get in and out of Mrs. Chirpich also brought up the memo she received from the Fire Chief stating they needed a large stable area to work from, but it doesn't state the size of the pool. She again stressed how easy the pool is to get in and out of, with only a depth of 25 ". Mrs. Chirpich then commented on the question of the rushing water when emptied. She mentioned she and her neighbor experienced it when they started emptying it, adding that the rush is definitely a push but not enough to push an adult over. The water "rush" did not push either one of them over. Boardmember Noonan questioned the depth of the pool, restrictions on the height, what determines it to be a pool, wading pool vs. swimming pool, etc. He added he has some is concerns with no type of boundary or guidance from the City on this. Boardmember Noonan questioned if this pool requires a permit. He pointed out no permit was issued for CBA minutes 9/29/2003 Page 2 this pool, Chirpichs did not understand if they needed a permit, and the code requirements should be more clear. Boardmember Noonan suggested using the About Town or other means of technology to address some of these issues to head them off. Boardmember Noonan then brought up fencing safety on both above and in ground pools and the ability for anyone walk up to this pool. He also questioned the deck requirement around the pool. Is this a good thing or bad thing? We do not allow them to raise the grade to make up the deck surface. He brought up his experience as a paramedic and concerns on rescues, other than drowning, were head and neck injuries. Because of this, more equipment is brought into a pool and the staging area is a little more important with backboards etc, to adequately get people safely out of the pool. This is a different application, there is no diving into the pool, but such injuries could happen even in a shallow body of water. He talked to Marty (Fire Chief) about the effect of water rushing out of the pool on rescuers who will be burdened with gear and unknowledgeable of what they are getting into till they get to the scene. He questioned how health issues would be regulated on a 5,000- gallon pool with no required chemical treatment. Judy Chirpich commented that she uses chemicals to keep the pool water clean. Boardmember Noonan questioned the size of the body of water and whether it would be harder to maintain then a wading pool, and asked if that should be looked at. Chairman Glover mentioned that before he received the. staff report he was more accepting of the pool. The sanitation aspect is not one that is high on priorities because one can have the system in any pool and not put chemicals in or not operate it properly. Chairman Glover said his concern is the lack of an unobstructed deck around the pool and the lack of fencing. He pointed out if the variance for this pool - which is 30" deep and fairly accessible to an adult person for rescue - is approved, then other above ground pools that are higher will have to be addressed. Until we have some model codes in effect and some experience he will not support this appeal. Boardmember Clark mentioned that his biggest concern is safety, or the lack of it and the City does have an ordinance in place regulating pools. This type of above ground pool is a new twist for the City, and if the board approves this pool the board may not be in keeping with the ordinance. Boardmember Clark said he personally has concerns over this and has concerns especially for the City of Edina. The safety issue is a huge concern for him and he can't see how he can support the variance request. Boardmember Fisher stated he also agrees this type of pool presents a safety issue. If this pool is approved, where does the City draw the line? He added he agrees with other comments that this poses problems, and in his opinion the variance would be tough to support. Chairman Glover asked if there is any further discussion Boardmember Noonan asked if there is any conditional use that could be considered here. CBA minutes 9/29/2003 Page 3 2 Mr. Kirchman stated this an issue that the City Council may want to look into and see if they are willing to consider it. He added he doesn't believe a conditional use permit can be implemented here, but the Board can make recommendations to the Council. Boardmember Noonan mentioned since the pool is already down for the season, it appears the homeowner has time to appeal our decision to the Council. Chairman Glover asked for a motion on this variance request Boardmember Fisher motioned for denial. Boardmember Clark seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion to deny variance passed. Asked if there was any recommendation that can be made at this time that this be forwarded on and who has to actually make the request to the city for an appeal to council Mr. Kirchman also stated that staff has already made their recommendations based on our research, but if the Construction Board of Appeals would like to pass on recommendations to Council that needs to be included in the motion. Chairman Glover asked if the insurance company had been spoken to. Mr. Velde said that he called an adjuster, and they said they didn't have any experience on the soft -sided pools. Boardmember Clark asked if there were a kind of set up standards either by the manufacturers or the distributors or the insurance industry that we might want to borrow to incorporate that language into this ordinance. That way we would have a clearer set of standards Mr. Velde said there are standards for above ground swimming pools that are established by the National Swimming Pool Institute. That is something that could be incorporated into an ordinance if we are suggesting allowing above ground swimming pools in the City. There are no standards for the smaller soft -sided portable swimming pool. Boardmember Clark mentioned at the last meeting they discussed considering that the Council look into the possibility of allowing above ground pools. It was acknowledged at that time that the Council would have to revisit this issue because this board does not have the authority to make that decision. Boardmember Clark noted the board is aware the City looked into permitting above ground pools in the past and the Council decided at that time to prohibit them. P CBA minutes 9/29/2003 Page 4 Mr.-Kirchman asked that even in the absence of an appeal you could direct us to inquire to Council whether they would be willing to consider any changes in the ordinance Gerald Robinson asked. for a clarification from Mr. Velde why there are no standards for soft -sided pools by the National Swimming Pool Institute. Are those standards for water quality, or does cover other safety issues, for example the decking, ladders etc Mr. Velde explained that it covers everything from filtration equipment, design, whether it has a diving pool or not, recirculation system, filters, chlorinators, pumps and includes standards for water quality. Mr. Robinson pointed out that it seems to just cover the mechanicals and water quality but not the safety, or rescue type of issues, like the decking, fencing, etc. Mr.Velde said that there is a section on decking and fencing, they recommend those, they are not part of the standards but recommendations for communities to follow. Chairman Glover asked how to direct staff to go to council with this recommendation so we are not left in the same situation as when we first started this. There was discussion with the council about 15 -20 years ago and there is no record as to why is was turned down. Need to get out concerns of the issue of safety around the pool to Council. Mr. Velde suggested a memo from the chair to the City Council to raise, that issue. Staff could draft a memo for Chairman Glover to sign and pass it on to City Council and they could ask for more information or take it from there. Boardmember Noonan would like to expand this discussion from pools to include play structures, trampolines, etc. Mr. Robinson stated that, in his opinion, the Construction Board of Appeals has the ability to go into depth if they chose to do an initial draft of a code. To go to the City Council and say, here are our thoughts on the issue and some initial background research, at least give them a little firmer starting position. Mr. Kirchman explained that the Construction Board of Appeals actually is required by the State to be in place by the State Building Codes and Standard Division and.its primary purpose is to make decisions on the building code, not on city ordinances. Typically, a Construction Board of Appeals would not be dealing with city ordinances at all; they would be dealing with state codes. But this is the way we are set up here. I would prefer that since we are working with a city ordinance that we can't change anyway that we let Council look at it and direct staff or the Board. They may send it back to us to make some recommendations for an ordinance. If so, the Board will have a clear direction and directive. 0 1 • C7 CBA minutes 9/29/2003 Page 5 Chairman Glover asked if any other comments Steve Kirchman confirmed that the staff will draw up a memo for the Chair to go to Council II. CBA03 -02: 6301 Knoll Dr. S. — Edina City Code, Section 450.06, Subd 8, regulating pool ladders Chairman Glover next item on the agenda is in regards to the swimming pool ladder at the Brockway residence and it clearly falls under jurisdiction. Asked if everyone read information put together by staff. Asked for discussion. Boardmember Noonan asked who signed the permit when it was picked up, was it the homeowner or through a pool company? Mr. Velde answered that it was a pool company and they were aware that a ladder was required. Boardmember Noonan asked if the signature line of the permit application "I will comply with all," part of the language? Mr. Kirchman answered yes and it was marked on the plans. Boardmember Fisher asked why is he appealing this? Mr. Velde answered that Mr. Brockway doesn't want the ladder. He's got a swim -out in the deep end that he uses to get in and out of the pool and doesn't want the ladder obstructing the view of the pool, because the ladder has a handrail. Boardmember Fisher mentioned that they knew this before he built the pool that a ladder was required. Mr. Velde said that he doesn't know if the homeowner knew but the contractor did, and we believe that the reason the ladder with the hand rail is necessary is if somebody is in trouble in the water they at least have something to grab onto to pull themselves out. Boardmember Fisher is surprised why this is even here, suggested to put the ladder in. Boardmember Noonan asked Mr. Velde if he has seen the pool Mr. Velde said no that Solvei Wilmot has, she was out on the final inspection and discovered the ladder missing. Boardmember Noonan asked if there was any hardware embedded into the construction at all that would accept a ladder A . t ' CBA minutes 9/29/2003 Page 6 Mr. Velde said that that was not even there Boardmembers asked for swim -out details. Mr. Velde explained that on the deep end where the water is 6' or deeper a ledge is built in the corner of the pool just below water level to enable a swimmer to swim over there and sit on the and/or get out of the pool. These swim -outs are not permitted. City Code requires a ladder with handrails. A ladder can be installed without obstructing an existing swim -out. Boardmember Noonan asked if everything else meet code. Mr. Velde answered yes — also mentioned that there are about 20 inground swimming pools installed each year. We have well over 1000 pools in the City and it is not unusual to see a swim out but it is unusual to see a swan -out without a ladder. Boardmember Noonan commented on since the City doesn't do yearly inspections of these pools that these requirements are observed only at the final. Boardmember Fisher made a motion to deny the variance request. Chairman Glover seconded. All voted aye. The motion to deny the variance passed. Chairman Glover asked for any other discussion for any upcoming items. Chairman Glover asked for a motion to adjourn Boardmember Fisher made a motion, Boardmember Noonan seconded, all voted aye. The meeting was adjourned at 8:00AM. 0 • Uty oft my MEMORANDUM TO: Edina City Council FROM: Edina Construction Board of Appeals _ John Glover, Chairman DATE: October 23, 2003 SUBJECT: Above ground swimming pools, ECC 450.06, Subd. 11 On September 29, 2003 the Construction Board of Appeals denied a request for a variance for an above ground swimming pool at 5601 McGuire Road. Edina City Code Section 450.06, Subd. 11 prohibits above ground swimming pools. During deliberation on this matter, the Board questioned the reasoning behind the prohibition on above ground swimming pools in Edina. Research by staff found that the prohibition on above ground swimming pools was adopted by ordinance in 1979. The minutes from the City Council meeting did not shed much light on the reasoning behind the prohibition. The Board believes the prohibition was based upon aesthetics. The Board is requesting a reaffirmation of this prohibition from the City Council. The Board questions why an above ground swimming pool is treated differently than a large play structure or a trampoline in someone's yard. Beyond the issue of aesthetics, should above ground swimming pools be permitted, when other issues such as safety and sanitation are considered? G.\ConstMAp Is \BD03- 006,CBA03 -01,5601 MCGuieRdCBAabovegdp00ls1 (952) 927 -8861 FAX (952) 826 -0390 TDD (952) 826 -0379 City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TO: FROM: DATE: RE: MEMORANDUM Mayor and Members of the City Council Gordon L. Hughes, City Manager Jerome P. Gilligan October 24, 2003 ' f 1ft r 1 t-N OCT eUU3 Appeal from Construction Board of Appeals Regarding Above Ground Swimming Pool The Construction Board of Appeals heard an appeal from the homeowners at 5201 McGuire Road concerning a notice received from the City to remove an above ground swimming pool from their property. Section 450.06, subd. 11 of the City Code, prohibits above ground swimming pools. The appeal was denied by the Construction Board of Appeals and the homeowners are appealing this decision to the City Council. The removal of an above ground swimming pool is not a matter which is subject to an appeal to the Construction Board of Appeals and for this reason the appeal should be denied by the Council. ® Under Section 450.01 of the City Code, a swimming pool is defined as "any basin for holding water, designed for human use, with a water depth greater than 24 inches." The pool at 5601 McGuire is designed to hold water to a depth of 30 inches and therefore constitutes a swimming pool under the City Code. Since it is located above ground it is prohibited by Section 450, subd. 11 of the City Code. The homeowners appealed the notice to remove the pool to the Construction Board of Appeals. Section 400.02 of the City Code sets forth the powers and duties of the Construction Board of Appeals. Appeals may be considered by the Board from any order, requirement, permit, decision, refusal or determination made to the Building Official or the Sanitarian in the application or interpretation of the Code regulating certain building activities and excavations. In considering appeals the Construction Board of Appeals is determining whether the Building Official or Sanitarian is properly applying or interpreting the City Code and it does not have the power to grant variances or exceptions to the requirements of the City Code. The homeowners appealing the notice to remove the swimming pool are not contesting the interpretation of the City Code relative to their above ground swimming pool but are requesting a variance or exception to the prohibition of above ground swimming pools. There is no authority for the City Council to grant variances from the requirements of Section 450 of the City Code. If the Council wants to permit this type of pool it will need to amend the requirements of Section 450 of the City Code relating to above ground pools. I recommend that the City Council deny the appeal on the basis that it is not the proper ® subject of an appeal to the Construction Board of Appeals since the Board did not have the jurisdiction to hear this appeal. DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP . J Steve Kirchman From: Bev Haw Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 10:45 AM To: Steve Kirchman Subject: FW: Case File: CBA03 -01 -- Original Message----= From: Elizabeth E Stukel [ mai Ito: elizabeth.e.stukel @aexp.com] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 5 :10 PM To: bhaw@ci.edina.mn.us Subject: Case File: CBA03 -01 We live at 5517 McGuire Road, and our backyard adjoins that of Peter and Judy Chirpich. Not only do we not object to the child size swimming pool in their yard, we enjoy seeing the children play in it. It would be very disappointing for the Chirpich family, and their neighbors.if the pool were disallowed. Betsy E. and Randall J. Stukel. American Express made the following annotations on 10/27/2003 06:16:34 PM -------------------------------- *********************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** This message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient and may ® contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, use, or distribution of the information included in this message and any attachments is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and immediately and permanently delete this message and any attachments. Thank you." s r acs I s allawed 11_74e4 - ' •�v l �vw n ` 0 04 — l aUli_Gi14G Rik RTMENT OCT 2 1 2003 e v�-� City of Edina, Minnesota f EDINA CITY COUNCIL 801 West 50' Street *Edina, Minnesota * (952) 826 -0372 *Fax (952) 826 -0390 ell (it 5 ;?4 1e(0- r r gd[s"Lp, *E FILE: TO: Ll L I APPLICANT: PROPERTY ADDRESS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: CBA03 -01 Property Owners Within 200 Feet Peter and Judy Chirpich 5601 McGuire Rd Lot 6, Block 6, La Buena Vista PURPOSE: Edina City Code, Section 450.06, Subd 11, prohibiting above ground Swimming pools. JA d = DATE OF HEARING: Monday, November 3, 2003 TIME OF HEARING: 7:00 pm PLACE OF HEARING: Council Chambers Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street HOW TO PARTICIPATE: *Submit a letter expressing your view *Attend the hearing and give testimony, *Fax your views 952 826 0390 or, *E -Mail to bhaw @ci.edina.mn.us FURTHER INFORMATION: Write: City Hall, Inspections Department at 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424 or call 952 927 8861 DATE OF NOTICE: Wednesday October 15, 2003 r *City of Edina Buildings, Construction and Signs 450.10 water line ' indicating the greatest depth in feet. Diving structures shall be securely anchored. Subd. 10 Minimum Depth. The minimum depth for all pools shall be three feet except for special purpose pools. Subd. 11 Above Ground Swimming Pool; Fill. Swimming pools that are constructed or erected wholly above ground are and shall be prohibited. No fill shall be placed or grading done on the property to raise the ground elevation for the purpose of raising the top elevation of the pool walls. 450.07 Recirculation System. A recirculation system consisting of pumps, piping, filters, skimmers, valves, and disinfection equipment shall be provided which will clarify and disinfect the swimming pool water volume in 12 hours or less. The recirculation system components shall comply with NSF International 50, 1985. 450.08 Recirculation Pump. The recirculating pump shall have sufficient capacity to provide the rated flows of the filter system, without exceedin operated at loss at which the overload which exceeds the deliver such flows. The pump motor shal l not be o p service factor. The pool pump shall be equipped on the inlet side with an approved hair and lint interceptor. The basket of the interceptor shall be non - corrosive and have openings not larger than one - fourth inch in diameter. 450.09 Pool Piping. The pool piping shall be sized to permit the rated flows for filtering and cleaning without exceeding the maximum head at which the pump will provide such flows. In general, the water velocity in the pool piping should not exceed more than six feet per second. Where velocity is to exceed six feet per second, summary calculations shall be provided to show that rated flows are possible with the pump and piping provided. The recirculating piping and fittings shall meet the following requirements: Subd. 1 Vacuum Fitting Location. Where vacuum fittings are provided, they shall be located in accessible positions below the water line. Subd. 2 _Pool Recirculation Piping. Pool recirculation piping, passing through the pool structure, shall be copper, brass, or approved equal tubing with a minimum wall thickness of type "L ". Subd.3 Pool Piping System. The pool piping system shall be constructed of materials prescribed in the Minnesota State Plumbing Code. Subd. 4 Inspection of Pool Piping. Except for the pool water supply line, all pool piping must be installed by the pool contractor and must be inspected by the Building Official prior to covering the system. 450.10 Recirculating Skimming Device. Recirculating skimming devices shall be provided to skim the surface of the pool, with one unit installed to serve each pool, and such additional 450-6 Supplement 2001 -01 N � Minutes/Edina City Council/November 3, 2003 Alison Gregory, 6200 Fox Meadow Lane, submitted a letter dated October 21, 2003, stated a STOP sign at that location is not justified and will only i ase traffic noise and become a nuisance. Member Hovland made a motion approving the Minutes of the October 6, 2003, Traffic Safety Staff Review Section A; B and C: Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, ae zold Motion carried. Following a Council discussion Member Hovland made a motion directing staff to study a pedXHand, tian side k on Blake Road and to connect Interlachen Boulevard to Parkwood Ah sides of the street. Member Maetzold seconded the motion. Ayes: Houelly, Masica, Maetzol d Motion ca APPEAL OF CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION UPHELD FOR ABOVE GROUND SWIMMING POOL (5601 MCGUIRE ROAD) Assistant Manager Anderson gave background into the complaint regarding the above ground swimming pool located at 5601 McGuire Road. Edina City Code specifically prohibits above ground pools with water depth over 24 inches. As a result of that complaint, Tim and Judy Chirpich were notified of the violation and given the option to appeal the violation with the Construction Board of Appeals. That information was incorrect direction to give the residents at 5601 McGuire Road. Mr. Anderson elaborated that the Construction Board of Appeals does not have the authority to grant a variance for this type of violation. The Construction Board of Appeals examines interpretations made by the sanitarian and building official, related to the City Code. Everyone is in agreement that the above ground pool at 5601 McGuire Road is not in compliance. Options available are, 1) deny the appeal and 2) after study of the existing ordinance, consider a change to the Code related to the soft sided pools. Member Masica exited the Council Chambers at 8:55 P.M. Gerald Robinson, neighbor of the Chirpich family, stated his belief that there is ambiguity in the Edina City Code. Attorney Gilligan explained the issue began with an appeal process and the Construction Board of Appeals did not have jurisdiction to do this. He recommended upholding the decision of the Board and denying the appeal. If studying the Ordinance is the desire of the Council that is a possibility. Mr. Robinson said he believes the Chirpichs are challenging the Code regarding pools as well as play structures, etc. that was passed in 1979, based upon aesthetics. Building Official Kirchman explained the Board directed a memorandum to the Council asking that the 1979 Ordinance be studied and see if changes are warranted. Page 9 I Minutes/Edina City Council /November 3, 2003 Member Hovland made a motion upholding the decision of the Construction Board of Appeals denying the variance allowing an above ground swimming pool that is specifically prohibited by the City Code. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. Mr. Maetzold inquired if the Council wanted the Code to be studied and the results reported back to the Council at a later date. He explained the process to be followed would be, 1) staff studying the issue, 2) reporting results of the study to the Council with recommendations, 3) publish the issue, and 4) set a public hearing for resident comments at a Council meeting. Ms. Masica asked if the 1979 Code regarding above ground pools was based on aesthetics or safety issues. Mr. Kirchman explained no verbatim minutes exist from 1979. Several staff members recalled an incident precipitating the Ordinance, which was purely aesthetics. Chief Scheerer said the Fire Department does consider pools of this type a risk and a safety concern if a rescue is needed. Department staff train with rescue in below ground pools where there is a large stable area to work from. He added it would be difficult to step over the side and into a pool with an unknown depth. Mr. Housh queried if pools of this type are acceptable in other communities. Mr. Hovland voiced concern with, 1) how do you keep the water clean, 2) how do you get rid of the water, 3) how. are little neighborhood children kept out, and 4) how do little children get out of the pool. Mr. Anderson reminded the Council that the concern is complaint driven. Mr. Maetzold suggested further discussions and study of the Ordinance on the use of above ground pools. Mr. Kelly said he personally would not have staff study the issue. He voiced concern with, 1) no fencing, 2) small children in the neighborhood, 3) night time safety, and 4) water quality. He stated he would not be in favor of changing the ordinance. Ms. Masica said information she was provided in the packet stated that the pool was designed to be filled to a maximum level of 30 inches. Mr. Hovland said the Ordinance has not been studied for 25 years and staff should study the local and standards nation -wide for above ground pools. Page 10 r Minutes/Edina City Council/November 3, 2003 Mr. Anderson said staff would study the issue and report back to Council with their findings and recommendations. Mr. Kirchman indicated he has completed a study on the national standards of soft - sided pools and there are no standards for pools shallower than 36 inches nor are there standards for soft -sided pools. No formal Council action was taken. APPEAL OF CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION UPHELD FOR S MMING POOL LADDER Building Official Kirchman explained when a final inspe 'on was completed for the in- ground pool at 6301 South Knoll Drive, it was noted t t no ladder was installed in the pool. The homeowners were sent a letter dated July 29, 2 2, of this violation as follows: 'The swimming pool must have two means of egress from a pool. Steps may be used in the shallow end of the pool. A ladder with handrails mus be located at the deep end of the pool'. The homeowners, avid and Connie Brockway, appealed this decision with the Construction Board o ppeals. The Construction Board o peals recommends upholding the denial of the request for the deletion of an egress lad in the deep end of the applicant's swimming pool. Ms. Masica asked if the ladder s noted during the course of the plan review and brought to the attention of the pool builder. Mr. Kirchman said yes the builder, Quality Pools, is familiar in with Edina Ordinances. Connie Brockway, 6301 South Knoll Drive, "explained the pool was completed in June, 2003. Upon final inspection was the first time installation of a ladder was mentioned to them or the builder about a ladder being necessar . Installing a ladder now would be very expensive. She added that money and aesthetics are not a substitute for safety. They polled surrounding cities and Bloomington is the,only polled city that requires a ladder or a swim -out from the deep end of the pool. 1" Brockway said an internet search of the whole country was completed and the most, restrictive codes required either a ladder, a swim -out or a projecting bull -nose around"the pools perimeter. She concluded that if they had known a ladder was a requirement, they would have installed one. Mr. Kelly stated there would be no financial consequence to the home ;, ers but the builder would be responsible. He suggested the City notice the buil&r� about the violation and subsequent necessity of a ladder. Mr. Anderson stated that staff would notice the builder of the requirement. Page 11 I� f • � Minutes/Edina City Council/December 2, 2003 . AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT - YORKDALE SHOPPES PARTNERS /CITY OF EDINA, APPROVED' `manager Hughes indicted in 1996; e City and Yorkdale Shoppes Partners entered into a Reciprocal Easement Agreement;jwirespect to the construction the new York Avenue Liquor Store, Cub Store and Retail Center, located to the south of the Cub Store. The Easement Agreement provided that no restaurant could be located in the retail center that sold alcoholic beverages. The restriction w"posed by the private interest in the Easement Agreement, not the City. of Edina.. Yorkdale Shoppes Partners is now requesting that the City consent to an amendment removing the above noted restriction. This amendment is xeii ested to allow Chipotle, a new restaurant in the retail center, to be eligible for a liquor license did not require a su -ect restriction at the time the Agreement was negotiated, Edina uire The City of Ed a q bl there is no reason why the req je'sted amendment should not be approved. Following a brief Coun �' exchange, Member Kelly made a motion authorizing execution of the Reciprocal Easemeeement by and between Yorkdale Shoppes Partners, LLC and the City of Edina, with r ect to construction of the new York Avenue Liquor Store, Cub Store and Retail Center Gated south of the Cub Store. Member. Hovland seconded the motion. Ayes: H ,Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Mo ' carried.. REPORT PRESENTED ON RESIDENTIAL SWIMMING POheard L . from an VEdina Residential the November 3, 2003, Council meeting, two appeals were Swimming Pool Code; 1). denial of a variance from the Construction Board of Appeals allowing an above ground swimming pool; and 2). denial of variance allowing a "swim -out" as a means of egress from the deep end of a swimming pool in lieu of a ladder. The Council denied the appeal for the above ground swimming pool on the basis that the appeal to the Construction Board of Appeals was improper and should not have gone before the Council. In addition, the Council denied the appeal of a variance for the swim -out in lieu of a ladder. Mr. Velde said the Council directed staff to review both appeals and report back to the Council to consider amending the Code on both matters. The Council requested specific information on 1) definition of a swimming Pool; 2) safety; 3) aesthetics; 4). sanitation; and 5) rescue. Surrounding cities do not have as stringent regulations on residential pools. as does Edina. Bloomington has the most similar regulations of the cities surveyed. The remaining communities regulate the location of the pool and require four foot high fencing as a barrier around the pool but do not regulate the design or construction of residential swimming pools. Edina City Code defines a swimming pool as "any basin for holding water, designed for. human use, with a water. depth greater than 24 inches". Surrounding communities and the National Spa and Pool Institute (NSPI) Model Code includes a water depth greater than 24 inches as a basis for their definition of a swimming pool. Safety - Hopkins does not require fencing around residential swimming pools. NSPI addresses fencing as an option. Page 7 e Minutes/Edina City Council/December 2, 2003 Deckin - Edina and Bloomington require decking. NSPI model codes address decking as an option. of E r ess - Edina, Bloomington and Minneapolis require a means of egress of the a deep, , ad 1). — pools.. NSPI model codes address a means of egress from the deep end ladder with handrails, 2) swim -out, 3) underwater seats and benches, 4) mechanical lifts; and 5) any other design providing egress. Sanitation - Edina and Bloomington require a circulation system. wide deck Rescue k around the perimeter eter of a pool for accessibility to -Code requires afour -foot ards and . perform emergency procedures and store backbo gu y wimmin Pools - Edina's Code prohibits above ground pools. NSPI defines an Above Ground S above ground pool as "a removable pool that has atminim wall". NSPI model code requires6' ). same maximum water, depth of forty-eight inches (48) _ circulation system, 2) water depth between 24 and 36 inches, that above) provide ound pooLsepose of safety risk and sanitation as in- ground pools. Mr. Velde elaborated gr . for children 0 - 4 years as in- ground pools.. Mr. Velde concluded that provision for a swim -out at the deep end of the swimming pool in lieu of a ladder is allowed in NSPI model codes. Neighboring communities ddionnorequire atla would seem deep end of the pool and based upon the information gathered regarding oils. appropriate to allow other forms of egress from the deep end of swimming p meet the model code set forth in the NSPI standards would Above ground swimming pools th at meet the safety. and sanitation requirement set forth for in- ground swimming pools. The need for a deck around the perimeter of the above ground swimming pool is warranted for safety. and rescue purposes. This would add to the mass of the above ground swimming pool and may, have an impact on the lot coverage of a residential property. Staff recommends the following actions: ools to. include 1. Amend City Code derw aSection benches and seats as a means of egr�es fiom the deep . end of swim -outs, un the swimming pool. 2. Seek input from the public whether to amend the City Code to allow above ground swimming pools with a water depth of 36 inches mat have a design water depth 3. Not allow the use of above ground swimming pools between 24 inches and 36 inches due to the lack of model standards for the design and construction of such pools. 4. Consider amending City Code Section 450 by reducing oil thereby requirement for a the continuous deck around the perimeter of the swimming pool. installation of. a "vanishing edge" feature on a swimming p The Consideration may also be given to adopting less regulation for. residential and im timing i pools. Permit minimum requirements should include fencing around the swimming p ensuring that the proposed pool meets the setback requirements set forth in the Zoning Ordinance. help Mr. Housh asked what NSPI stands for and s voiced and concern and may a m to trade contractors. Mr. Velde said NSPI is the. Nation p organization but their model codes incorporate all the features found in the Edina Pool Ordinance. Page 8. 4 _ Minutes/Edina City Council/December 2, 2003 Mr.. Housh inquired if communities. that were surveyed had recently amended their ordinances regarding pools- Mr. Velde noted that that was not made clear with the survey but Edina ars historically has had a large number of pools for manyyeHoush said aescommunities wun ou should be readily. the interest in regulating them as closely as we do. recognizable for a person having a problem in the pool. Mr. Hovland inquired whether Edina regulates what re are stringent rules. Mr. Hovland indicated that when a diving board is included in the pool, g concern that pools have enough swim outs for persons o n-dght required in the deep current Code states if the pool is over. 30 feet wide, two of e gr ess are end. Mr. Kelly said having a swim -out in the deep endof the ep l t change the believes it is easier to see a ladder. He inquired whether there is a compelling o is made. She asked how Ms. Masica suggested more information be obtained Mr. saidsfencing would surround the fencing is installed around a vanishing edge pool. entire pool. Mr. Hughes suggested preparing an amendment above ground pool ivanishing uld not be a part of swim -out /ladder issue in residential pools. The gr P the amendment. . No formal Council action was taken. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Member e following motion and shown in detail on the sec: ed the motion approving payment Check 'ster dated November 19, 2003, and consisting of 29 pages: GenerConstruction Fund $�Fund 644.43 Coaununic 'ons Fund $3,246.62; Working Capital Fund $1,088,644.43; Art nter Fund $2,161.68; Golf Dome Fund $6,670.98; Aquatic Center Fund $1,309.39; $78,043.83; Golf Course Fun ,,,1639.75$; Ice Arena Fund $27,129.97; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fun $24,265.61; Liquor Fund $139,524.04; Utili 613un and for approval f payment of claims d t d Agency Fund $935.35; TOTAL $1,919,45 November 25, 2003, consisting ,of 29 pages: 8 eAnretraCe �d Fund $Z5,?55.11Communication olf Dome Fund $2,964.22; Working Capital Fund,_$120,25 , $218.11; Aquatic Center Fund $1,7(11.00; Golf Course. Fund $2,688.90; Ice Arena Fund $470.85; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $6;-523.18; Liquor Fund $149,926.24; Utility Fund $40,456.49; PSTF Agency Fund $642.80; TOTAL $512,339,73. Motion carried on rollcall vote -. five ayes.. FIRST READING GRANTED FOR ORDINANCE NO. 2003 -13 -r SME IJDIN approved and SECTION 185 INCREASING CERTAIN FEES Affidavits of Notice were r rr ordered placed on file. ? Mr. Hughes noted that Ordinance No. 2003 -13 proposed an increase'in on -sale liquor fees, thereby requiring a public hearing. =, Mayor Maetzold called for public comments. No one appeared to speak. Page 9 RESPONSE TO LETTER IN AUGUST 2, 2005 PACKET. City of Edina Centennial Lakes/Edinborough Park Memorandum Date: August 11, 2005 To: John Keprios From: Tom Shirley Re: Centennial Lakes pathways I am writing in response to the recent letter that you had received regarding the safety of the Centennial Lakes pathways. Although the letter writers' account of current conditions at the park is purely fictional, I do believe that an expansion of our current "No biking areas" policy is in order. Even though we have never encouraged biking in the park, the occasional bike rider has always been apart of the park's recreational mix, sharing the park pathways for the past 15 years with many other users. In all that time there has never been a report of a single bicycle /pedestrian accident. In spite of this fact, I feel that there are some areas of the park pathways that are less than desirable for bicycles. The pathway on the east and south side of the lake is as little as 6 feet wide, with many curves and steep drop -offs. In addition, the pathway winds through the putting course area, which can become quite congested on nice summer days. Unfortunately, some bike riders also like to veer off of the pathways and onto the putting greens, damaging the fragile turf. Back in 1991, the Edina Park Board had given us the ability to install signage prohibiting bicycles in any areas of the park that we saw fit. To date this signage has been used sparingly, most notably in the current amphitheater area and in the area around the Centrum during our pre - amphitheater days. Last week we installed additional signage prohibiting bicycles on the east side of Centennial Lakes, from the north entrance off of the Yorktown Park strip down to 76th Street, and again inside the entire south park loop in the office park area. The west side pathways remain open to bicycles, primarily to provide the bike riders that do need to pass through this area a safe alternative to France Avenue. It is important to remember that the west side pathway, which can be as wide as 25 feet, was designed as a commuter corridor, with the ability to handle large buses or trolleys. To help ensure the continued well being of the park walkers, signage has been placed on the west side of the park restricting the speed limit for bicycles to 10 MPH. To date we have heard no comment from park patrons regarding these changes. We will monitor the effect, if any this policy has on our patrons and pass the observations on to you. Please call me with any questions. Thanks! /n r "I UNAPPROVED MINUTES OF THE Edina Transportation Commission Thursday, July 21, 2005 Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Community Room MEMBERS PRESENT: Fred Richards, Marie Thorpe, Jean White, Warren Plante, Joni Kelly Bennett, Les Wanninger MEMBERS ABSENT: Marie Thorpe STAFF PRESENT: Steve Lillehaug, Sharon Allison L Call to Order Chair Richards called the meeting to order. It. New Business a. Edina Transportation Commission Policy Brochure Lillehaug presented the draft brochure to the Commissioners. Members will review and comment so that a final decision can be reached at the August meeting. The Communications Director will also review the brochure. /it. Old Business a. Traffic Study Work Plan & 2006 City of Edina Budgeting Schedule Lillehaug updated the Commissioners on the work plan for the top three ranked traffic issue areas as follows: Edina High School, Valley View Middle School and Creek Valley School Area: a traffic study to be conducted by staff is proposed; anticipated completion is late 2005. West 70th Street: on July 19th, staff requested an increase to City's budget to conduct a traffic and landuse study. Council to consider the request through August and September. Staff is recommending that a consultant conduct this study. The anticipated cost is $40,000. Because of West 70th Street's usefulness to the Southdale area, Richards noted that they should hear from the Southdale consultants what they are going to address where West 70th is concerned. Northeast Edina Area: Council authorized funding for a traffic study. The study will be conducted by a consultant and the request for proposals will be presented to the Commissioners on August 18th for. recommendation and approval. The anticipated cost is $60,000. b. In- street Pedestrian Crossing Sign Policy (Revised) Dovolis motioned to recommend that Council adopt the In- street Pedestrian Crossing Sign Policy as recommended by the ETC. Seconded by Wanninger. Motion carried. c. Update — Valley View Road/TH 169 Interchange Federal Funding and Round -a -bout Option Lillehaug said Mn /DOT made revisions to the plans based on the feedback they received from the Commission. They've also changed their opinion on single -lane round -a -bouts and is now going with two lanes. Lillehaug said the revised plan is less costly and qualifies for federal funding (federal funds have already been requested); project cost will be split between Edina and Eden Prairie and Mn /DOT may also share in the cost due to significant reduction in the overall projected cost. Lillehaug said some park land might still need to be acquired. Municipal Consent has been delayed while the revised plans are being reviewed. Dovolis said he would like to send a statement of support to Mn /DOT. Richards said he disagrees because of the acquisition of park land. Dovolis motioned to send a statement of support to Mn /DOT. Seconded by Bennett. Ayes: 2 (Dovolis, Bennett) Nays: 3 ( Wanninger, Richards, Plante) Abstain: 1 (White) Motion failed. IV. Handouts a. Correspondence Dan and Dianne Latham, 7013 Comanche Court, in an email to the ETC, on behalf of the neighborhood, requested that "a sidewalk be built on the northside of Valley View between McCauley and Braemar Blvd, as well as other appropriate improvements for traffic calming measures." Mrs. Latham said the area is impassable and unsafe due to shrubs, trees and other obstacles that force them to walk too far out into the street. She said a petition was submitted in 2005 for the construction of a sidewalk. Lillehaug said the area in reference is a missing segment in the City's sidewalk plan. He said a feasibility study would be done this fall with a recommendation for construction potentially next summer. The cost would be a 80/20 split with the benefited residents being assessed 20% because Valley View is a State Aid roadway. Other residents in attendance with the Latham's are: Richard and Naomi Griffith, 7009 Comanche Court; Carol and Jan Frisch, 7025 Comanche Court; Heidi Mogck, 7137 Valley View; and Janna Homan, 7033 Comanche Court. 2 Another email was received from Michael and Suzy Whitt, 6001 Chowen Ave., rearding the intersections of 60th & France Avenue and 60th & Chowen Avenue. At 60 & France Avenue they are concerned with speed and visibility and they are recommending that a traffic signal be installed. At 60th & Chowen they are concerned with speed and motorists running the stop sign and they are recommending the installation of some type of traffic calming device to slow traffic. Lillehaug recommended that they submit an NTMP application for 60th and Chowen Avenue and he is talking with Hennepin County about the possibility of a traffic signal at 60th & France Avenue. V. Approval of Minutes: June 16, 2005 Corrections to minutes: Page 2, 1St paragraph, 4th line: add bold italics "...noted that the consultant's report did mention that current land use on West 70th Street is inconsistent with..." Wanninger motioned to approve minutes with above correction. Seconded by Bennett. Motion carried. Vt. Open Discussion Lillehaug stated that a rezoning application was received for Riverview at 50th and Indianola Avenue. He stated that the rezoning trip generation should be reduced as a result of going from single and multi - family to condominiums. Staff does not believe a traffic study is warranted and therefore one is not recommended. Commissioners agreed with staff and concurred not to recommend performing a traffic study. Dovolis recused himself from voting because he is the architect. Meeting adjourned. The next meeting is scheduled for August 18th, 6 -00 -8:00 p.m., in the Community Room, City Hall. 3 C 1' i; �. ., f ii.� �' ���. ^_�, r, J _ =.l. L C 1' i; �. Frustrated by your Special Assessments? NISI No �o4n oIP ITooMc How did we get here? • Why is a change to. the policy necessary? • How was the. policy- analyzed? • What is the. proposed. policy? Why should there be a change? tD11-'CITY OF EDINA Why should there be a change to the policy? Informational meetings conducted with neighborhoods in winter of 2004 • Staff recommends street be reconstructed with curb &gutter • Residents concerned about: —Cost of improvements —Need for Curb and Gutter loins s If ■1 i ' ME�vlar, 1M llf 11 111III11L�111 I NGF OF ROADWAYS ___ A _ i > 35 YCAH e 11A VWAM Estimated of Street 1 vu U Z���r�amw �wcrarm c ors �.�.��tiz wars ��-r�qi ry a oc LU .4© . a. ------- ----- 20-- ;0 10 30 40 50 60 Age ar When? Local Streets 0 - 2009 ® 2005 -2010 = 2006 -2011 - 2007 r: _- _ - -, 2012 2008 -2013 -2014 State Aid Streets Pavement Type Gravel N 0---f 2005 _ PCC W E 0--& 2006 2007 S 0--* 2008 Enpineedng Dept January, 2005 o « 2009 GO , co4rr @19 cooraa Curb &Gutter Concerns le Spring public hearings raised concerns about curb &gutter — Like the "country" look without C &G — Concerned. about added. cost of C &G —Many don't understand. the. need for C &G because they don't have. it now CITY OF EDINA Areas with no Curb &Gutter Approx. 16% C36 CITY OF EDWA Reasons for Curb &Gutter • Controls drainage on roadway • Extends life of pavement • Reduces maintenance —less damage from snow plowing • Aids in street sweeping • Keeps parking on street instead of in residents yards — ex. Skyline Dr. • Mandatory in areas of poor soil, flat conditions or steep grade change Projects Assessed in Prior Years Year Location Project Cost/Lot 1999 Bedford Ave. Reclaim and Curb & Gutter $2,132 1999 Hankerson Ave Reclaiming $1,223 2000 56th /Brookview Reconstruction $4,198 2000 Skyline Dr. Reclaiming $2,691 2000 Highland Park Reclaiming $2,366 2000 Eden Pr. Rd. Reclaim and Curb & Gutter $1,863 2001 School Rd. /59th Reconstr. and partial C &G $2,248 2002 Lakeview Dr. Petition for C &G $6,000 2004 White Oaks /Maple Rd. Reconstruct and C & G $5,941 * Avg. Cost - Assessed on footage Projects Proposed in 2004/2005 Year Location Project Cost/Lot 2004 Halifax/Grimes Reconstr.and Curb &Gutter $7,813 2005 Schaefer Circle Reconstruction $8,500 2005 Schaefer Rd. Reconstruction $10,800 2005 So. Harriet Pk. Reconstruction $7,245 2005 Sunnyslope Reconstruction w /minor C &G $11,075 2005 Shannon Dr. Curb &Gutter $2,250 2005 Bridge Lane Reconstr. w /Curb &Gutter $9,690 Future Street Reconstruction Projects Year Number of Projects Range of Proposed Costs 2006 3 $8,000 - $12,000 /lot 2007 3 $5,000 - $10,000 /lot 2008 3 $10,000 - $13,000 /lot 2009 5 $6,000 - $11,500/lot 2005 3 $7,500 - $9,000 /lot Cost Varies by amount of Curb & Gutter and Density of Project Oil CITY OF EDINA Consideration for Change • Impact of large assessments on homeowners • Requirements of Ch. 429 Statutes on Special Assessments: — Property levied must receive benefit from improvement — Assessment must be uniform — Assessment must not exceed special benefit • Is the City at risk of legal challenge on assessments at proposed 2005 rates for road improvements? How was the policy analyzed? :: CITY OF EDINA Tools for Analysis • Engaged the Valuation Group to complete an appraisal report on how roads equate to market value for residential neighborhoods • City Engineer and Asst. City Manager visited 5 communities to get a detailed analysis of how each one handles road reconstruction and special assessments CITY OF EDINA Appraisal Study Methodology • Studied 3 neighborhoods with potential road reconstruction projects and identified what the market value benefit was of the projects —South Harriet Park — Sunnyslope — Rolling Green CITY OF EDINp Appraisal Study Methodology 5 -part Analysis: 1. Resale Analysis — ID properties that sold twice (before and after reconstruction) — 29 properties 2. Paired Sale Analysis —study neighborhoods where reconstruction occurred - analyze before and after sales on comparable homes in area —10 properties 3. Survey of Experienced Residential Appraisers (22) 4. Survey of Realtors active in Edina 5. Survey of Property Owners who have experienced street reconstruction :: CITY OF EDINA Appraisal Study Results Market Value Benefits for subject neighborhoods: • So. Harriet Park with C &G - $9,000 — 10,000 Appraisal study engaged before C &G was removed from project • Sunnyslope with C &G - $12,000 - $14,000 • Sunnyslope without C &G - $10,000 - $12,000 • Rolling Green without C &G - $14,000 - $16,000 • Indicated benefits represent 1.0 — 2.0% of home value in respective neighborhoods • Market Value Benefit applies to neighborhoods where original improvements are in poor condition • All subject neighborhoods' streets appear to be at or near the end of their useful life 019 CITY c� of EDiN�► Assessment Survey of Other Cities • Surveyed 6 communities on road construction assessment practices — Bloomington — Fridley — Golden Valley — Maple Grove — Plymouth — Wayzata Oil CITY Of EDINA Results of Assessment Survey • All use a pavement management system to determine need for reconstruction • All cities except Wayzata require Curb & Gutter • Each city has some form of tax support for assessments: — % of total assessment covered — Bloomington, Plymouth — Fixed $assessments increased by construction index annually — Golden Valley, Fridley, & Maple Grove Ut' CITY OF EDiwn Results of Assessment Survey • Each used different method for State Aid Streets • All but one used 10 -year assessments (one was 20 -year) • Interest Rate was combination of bond rate and % or fixed percentage • Funding Source for Program — Direct Tax Levy, Progressively Increasing Debt Tax Levy or Substantial Reserve @o4V acs IRIDDM1a Results of Assessment Survey • All cities struggling to find resources for street improvements Proposed Assessment Policy CITY OFEDINA i rmw ter Utility 1. Curb & Gutte r to be paid by Sto a y Fund for Non -State Aid Residential Streets Rationale: 1. Curb & Gutter is the above - the - ground stormwater drainage system 2. Important in areas of steep grade, poor soils, and very flat,areas 3. Extends life of roadway, reduces maintenance, eases snowplowing... 4. Eases decision by neighborhood, taking dollar impact out of decision on reconstruction 5. Appraisal Consultant indicated some level of City participation reduces likelihood of success of legal challenge Ulf CITY OF EDINA will. Curb & Gutter to be paid by Stormwater Utility Fund for Non -State Aid Residential Streets Curb & Gutter Costs for 2004/2005 projects: Halifax & Grimes - $1377000 Shannon Dr. - $18,000 Sunnyslope - $40,000 Bridge Lane - $10,000 Schaefer Cr. - $142000 Total - $219,000 Estimated Impact on Assessments: Project Original Cost/Lot New Cost/lot Halifax $7,813 $67142 Sunnyslope $11,075 $10,522 S. Harriet $7,245 $7,245 Schaefer Rd. $10,810 $10,810 Schaefer Cr.* $8,500 $8,500 Shannon Dr. $2,250 $0 Bridge Ln. $9,691 $8,784 * Will omit C &G if policy not apprvd. [lam CITY OF EDiNA 01%1. Curb &Gutter to be paid by Stormwater Utility Fund for Non -State Aid Residential Streets • Additional $2.00 /household /quarter -Fee Necessary to pay for 2004/2005 costs • Estimated Future Curb and Gutter Costs: — 2006 - $441,000 (+$2.14/hshid/qtr) — 2007 - $621,000 ( +$1.56 /hshld /qtr) — Assumes Neighborhoods agree to installation of C &G • Current Rate does not reflect actual project costs — need an increase of $1- 2 /hshld /qtr for existing projects • Staff Recommendation — Increase fee $4 /hshld /qtr to cover current costs, 2004/2005 C &G and a portion of future costs %� CITY OF EDtHA Stormwater Utility Rate Comparison City 2005 S.F. Rate /Qtr City 2005 S.F. Rate /Qtr Edina $6.74 Golden Valley $21.80 Eden Prairie $3.00 Burnsville $17.22 Hopkins $12.00 Woodbury $15.25 Bloomington $12.03 Wayzata $9.01 Minnetonka $12.00 Plymouth $11.13 Richfield $9.61 Median * $9.86 St. Louis Pk. $7.20 Average * $10.14 * Complete Survey Includes 28 Metropolitan Cities t ON" CITY Of EDINA 01%2. Street Reconstruction Cost (excluding C &G) should be assessed at 100% of the cost • Valuation Group Report indicates the market value benefit of the proposed street projects equate to the cost of the road reconstruction • By paying for Curb and Gutter, the appraisal consultant indicates the risk of losing an assessment challenge is greatly diminished • Street Reconstruction Costs represent a portion of the total project costs. Most projects involve significant water, sewer or storm sewer costs which are not assessed E0« #2. Street Reconstruction Cost (excluding C &G) should be assessed at 100% of the cost Project Total Project Cost Assessable Cost % Assessable Halifax $888,900 $420,000 47% So. Harriet Pk. $1,029,872 $588,000 57% Sunnyslope $1,028,218 $663,000 64% Schaefer Rd. $264,290 $195,000 74% Shannon Dr. $168,719 $0 0% Bridge Lane $106,601 $97,000 91% 4 MWCITY OF EDINJ 810 #3. Assessable Unit for Residential Street Projects should be the Residential Equivalent Unit (lot) rather than front footage • Trips generated for residential lots are the same regardless of the size of the lot. A resident on a corner lot, cul -de -sac, or circular street should not be penalized or benefit due to the front footage of their lot 00 ou CITY OF EDINA #4. If a corner lot is subject to multiple street assessments over a period of years, the total assessable cost should be the equivalent of one Residential Equivalent Unit • Past City Assessment Policy allowed a corner lot to be assessed at 1 R.E.U. for the lot's front footage and an additional 1/3 R.E.U. for the sideyard • For purposes of fairness and equity, a corner lot should be assessed for a total of one R.E.U. CITY OF EDINA #5. Multiple Assessments cannot be treated differently than areas with only one assessment • Issue driven by potential Country Club Area road assessment in combination with soundwall assessment • All homes in road assessment area must be treated equally • Option to open up sound wall assessment to extend term, but opens the situation up to legal challenge. Council could opt not to change if any challenge were to occur. 015 CITY OF EDINA on #6. The term of residential roadway assessment should stay at 10 years • Discussion at early workshops about extending term of residential road assessments to 15 years • Public Improvement bonds at 10 years — Rating agencies need payout schedules to match term of A. • • City has other debt issues that are longer term, raters like variation in debt terms for different projects Ing CITY OF EDINA V. The interest rate on assessments will be set at the bond rate plus 2 %. If bonds have not been issued for 12 months, the 10 year Aaa rate will be used • Discussion at public hearings and workshops expressed concerned about the City's assessment interest rate • The proposed index would place the rate at approximately 5.9% • Statutory requirements mandate that our rate be at this level, unless a tax component is added to the annual payments • This rate places us at a level lower than most Cities - J8 CITY F EDINA 0117. The interest rate on assessments will be set at the bond rate plus 2 %. If bonds have not been issued for 12 months, the 10 year Aaa rate will be used City Calculation Index Assess. Int. Rate Edina Bond Rate + 2% 3.92% 5.92% Bloomington Bond Rate +1 % 3.92% 4.92% Plymouth Prime Rate+ 1 /2% 6.25 6.75% Fridley None - 6.50% Maple Grove None - 6.00% Woodbury Bond Rate +2% 3.92% 5.92% Eagan Bond Rate +2% 3.92% 5.92% Off CITY OF EDINA #8. The City will accept both partial and full pre- payments on assessments before going to County tax rolls. For ease of administration, a minimum of 25% of the assessable cost must be applied for partial prepayment • Current policy only allows full pre - payment on any of our assessments. • This would allow residents to pay down a portion of the assessment to lower the annual burden on their tax bill M The only time this is allowed is from the point of ki the assessment hearing until taxes are certified to r the County — approx. 30 days 00 Us- #9 Payment Schedule — Assessments should be calculated on a declining payment schedule because it is cheaper than a "mortgage style" amortized schedule Declining Payment Level Payment Assessment $12,000 $12,000 Interest Rate 6.0% 6.0% Term 10 years 10 years Range of Pmts $1,920 to $1,272 $1630 Total Cost $15,960 (- 2.16 %) $16,304 #10 — The new, policy should not be retroactive to projects that have already been assessed • Too difficult to decide how far back you go to re- assess , • Projects in past 5 years were substantially less expensive than current and future projects • All Cities interviewed that changed policy did not make retroactive changes • Re- assessment opens the project up to challenge Y #11— A few elements of the Senior Deferral Program should change for equity and fairness • Current program's interest rate is 1 % higher than standard assessment rate. This should be changed to reflect the new proposed interest rate (bond rate + 2 %) • Current policy requires than both spouses live in the residence. This should be changed to reflect situations that require one of the spouses to be in a facility that accommodates changing health situations (i.e. assisted living centers, etc.) I � MW EDD Other Issues • State Aid assessments Recommend projects under construction or complete, but not assessed, be handled under current policy since original hearing indicated assessment methodology Staff will be recommending a higher residential contribution in future after evaluation State Aid should change to an R.E.U. assessment over front footage Ro �C Other Issues • State Aid assessments continued: — Great Variation in State Aid projects — width of 50th street vs. width of Wooddale Higher level of specification for State Aid streets results in higher cost — Greater level of traffic on State Aid streets ti Lao @OUV @1P MOM 00 Other Issues • Why not taxes? — Stability of Revenue Source due to levy limits, debt limits and reverse referendum Taxes are the source for City "facility" capital improvements such as City Hall, Gymnasiums, Public Works facilities Questions? Bid for: 1) Schaefer Circle Roadway and Utility Improvements Improvement No. A -217, SS -419, STS -303 & WM-443 Contract No. Eng 05 -12 2) Public Hearing held on April 19th and May 17, 2005 3) City Council Ordered the project with watermain, but without concrete curb and gutter. 4) Residents have submitted a petition for concrete curb and gutter — ONLY IF PAID FOR BY THE CITY. 5) Staff issued an addendum, during the bid.....For adding surmountable curb and gutter. 6) Our bid documents allows staff to delete line items during the project and the contractor has agreed also to delete the concrete curb and gutter if the City Council does not adopt the proposed assessment policy. 7) Staff recommends awarding the bid to Penn Contracting, Inc. August 16, 2005 Dear Edina City Council, I understand there is a possibility of getting hockey back to Todd Park. Growing up in that area, (Circle West), nothing was more enjoyable in the winter than to walk to the park, lace the blades up, and play hockey with neighborhood friends. The ice was always very good, and there were many great "shinny" games played on that surface. Unfortunately, we did not have the updated warming house that is available today. Every time I drive by the park, it looks out of place without hockey boards. Luckily, I grew up during the time the rink was up and running (with boards). I never understood why the boards went away. Hopefully, I will see them again this winter. Coaching in the Edina hockey system, I am directly aware of the need for additional hockey rinks to serve the growing number of kids, especially girls. Let's get hockey back to Todd Park! Regards, Peter Hankinson Edina, Class of 1986 pp- cou 08/16/2005 13:04 6123346399 CRAIG HALLUM CAPITAL PAGE 02 i I C—RA IG —H ALLUM C n r i r n L r n o u a L L c RE: Todd Park Hockey Rink Ice Quality Dear Edina City Council: As you consider specific discussion of the Todd Park Rink, please note that I skated there consistently, for probably more than a decade, when the old Division Park boards existed. The ice quality was as good -or better —than any of the other.parks at that time. And it was based on the same clover, /grass groundcover mix that exists there today. The other kids from the neighborhood and I were at the park constantly. it was a very important part of our community and our lives. it fed my desire to play hockey and provided memories I will cherish forever. The kids of the neighborhood deserve the same opportunity. Regards, Jeff Bisson 9 Cooper Avenue 222 South Ninth Strcct Suitc 350 Minncapolis Minnesota 55402 Phonc: 612- 334 -6300 • 'Toll Frcc: 800- 752 -1476 • Fax: 612- 334 -6399 Trading: 800-752-1471 08/15/2005 10:23 9529369401 SPS HOCKEY PAGE 01 August 15, 2005 Edina City Council. Edina City Hall 4801 West 50" Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear City Council, I grew up at 5 Circle West in Edina. Since I was a little, my two brothers and the neighborhood kids skated at the Division Park Hockey rink. The ice quality was excellent. 1 have many great childhood memories from this and now, with my young family have moved to the Walnut Park area, and live about 50 feet from the hockey rink. Our kids can now enjoy the same wonderful childhood activities that I was able to. Ben Hankinson Edina, class of 1987 6515 Biscayne Boulevard, Mlnneapolls. Minnesota 55436 Tel: (952) 936 -9400 Fax: (952) 936 -9401 www.spshockcy.com Aug-15,2005 11:29AM Copeland Building COPELA14D B U I L D I N G _ CORPORATION August 15, 2005 Re: Proposed Todd Park Ice Rink Edina, MN Dear City Council: No.1648 P-2 5300 Hyland Greens Drive Suile 200 Bloomington, Minnesota 55437 (952) 8325302 (952) 8325301 Fox I grew up on Cooper Ave. and have many great memories of the time spent Teaming the game of hockey at Todd Park. As I recall, the ice was always maintained at the highest standard and the rink provided hours of enjoyment for all_ I strongly support the addition of another quality facility at Todd Park, Sincerely, / P614�- Robert R. Copeland, Jr. Edina, Class of 1988 r3UiiT )ING QUALITY R Dear City Council Members, I'm writing in regards to the' Todd Park ice situation. It is my understanding that there.is potential for new boards to be added to the rink. This would be a great. edition to the entire neighborhood and provide many children and families countless hours of enjoyment. Todd Park has always had so much potential as nice park, but has never really,flourished: Adding boards for the already beautiful warming house would be a first rate addition. r. Growing up on Circle West I was fortunate enough (thorough my father's dedication) to have my own backyard rink every winter. This is where I skated many of nights. After playing col ,legiately and professional this is where my FAVORITE memories come from. I would occasionally skate at Todd Park, and while'the ice was always good I was disappointed that they were never any boards. Many; kids do not have the luxury of their own rink. The city of Edina is so fortunate to have such beautiful rinks to skate on and provide countless hours of great times and memories for many Edina residents. I know how much fun I had in the cold winter months on the frozen pond and would love for residents of the Todd_Park community to share in that same experience. Instead of seeing these kids skate at Countryside, Walnut Ridge, Creek Valley, etc, it would be. great to have them stay close to home! Thanks for your time, Casey Hankinson