Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-09-06_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 6, 2005 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of August 16, 2005 II. PUBLIC HEARING - Transfer of Property, Haugland Development * III. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS - As per Pre -List dated August 17, 2005, TOTAL $737.50. IV. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL CONSTITUTION WEEK PROCLAIMED - SEPTEMBER 17 - 23, 2005 ROTARY CLUB OF EDINA PRESENTATION TO EDINA FIRE DEPARTMENT I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Special Meeting and Regular Meeting of August 16, 2005 H. PUBLIC HEARINGS ON VACATIONS OF STREET OR UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. If Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution 3/5 favorable rollcall of Council Members required to pass. . Rollcall A. VACATION OF PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT - Haugland Development III. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Zoning Ordinances: First Reading requires affirmative rollcall votes of three Council members except that a rezoning from residential to non - residential requires four affirmative votes. Second Reading requires affirmative rollcall votes of three of Council to pass except rezoning from residential to non - residential requires four affirmative votes. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall votes of four members of Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council members required passing. Conditional Use Permit: Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council members required to pass. Variance Appeal: Favorable rollcall of Council Members present to uphold or deny appeal A. SET HEARING DATE( 9/20/05) - Final Development Plan, Gramercy Club of Edina, 5101 West 70th Street B. APPEAL OF DECISION OF ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS - Accredited Investors, Inc. Sign, 5200 West 73rd Street - Continue to 10/4/05 IV. ORDINANCES - First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of three Council members to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative vote of four Council members to pass. .call A. FIRST READING - Ordinance No. 2005 -9 - Amending Section 185, Schedule A increasing the storm water rates effective October 31, 2005 V. AWARD OF BID A. Fiber Optic Network Construction, Imp. No. FO -003, Contract No. IT 05 -1 B. Reclaiming Blacktop and Concrete - Public Works Agenda /Edina City Council September 6, 2005 Page 2 VI. REPORTS/ RECOMMENDATIONS A. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - Transfer of Ownership - Time Warner Cable to Comcast B. RESOLUTION NO. 2005-80 - Safe & Sober Grant for October 1, 2005 - September 30, 2006 C. CONVEYANCE OF PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY - Haugland Development D. SET HEARING DATE (10/18/05) 2005 Special Assessments: Maintenance Improvement No. M- 05 - 50th & France Avenue Business District; Maintenance Improvement No. G -05 - Grandview Business District; Roadway Improvement No. A -202 - Halifax and Grimes Neighborhood Reconstruction; Roadway Improvement No. A -205 - Wooddale Avenue from Valley View Road to West 56th Street; Roadway Improvement No. BA -321 - Valley View Road from West 64th Street to Wooddale Avenue; Tree Removal Improvement No. TR -05; Aquatic Weeds Improvement No. AQ -05 Arrowhead And Indianhead Lakes And Minnehaha Creek Mill Pond; and Weed Mowing Improvement No. WD -05; Improvement No. HDIS05; Improvement No. HREM05; Improvement No. FEN -05 E. RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING CONTRACT EXTENSION F. RESOLUTION NO. 2005-78 - Special Assessment Senior Deferral Program G. RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -79 SETTING HEARING DATE (10/4/05) - Alley Vacation, Indianola & 50th Street H. PRESENTATION - Minnehaha Creek Watershed Visioning VII. FINANCE A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per Pre -List dated August 17, 2005, TOTAL $1,630,232.76; August 24, 2005, TOTAL $448,138.04; August 31, 2005 TOTAL $665,884.78 B. RESOLUTION No. 2005 -74 - Setting Maximum Tax Levies C. SET HEARING DATE - Truth In Taxation Hearing D. SET HEARING DATE (10/04/05) - Issuance of Bonds by Minneapolis Community Development Agency - Southdale YMCA VIII. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS A. RECEIVE PETITION - Street Lighting, South Knoll Drive B. RECEIVE PETITION - Street Reconstruction, Dever Drive, Park Place and Woodcrest Drive IX. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS X. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES A. Meeting with Legislative Delegation XI. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL XII. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEM SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS Thur Sep 15 Grandview Square Park Grand Opening 3:00 P.M. GRANDVIEW SQUARE PARK Tues Sep 20 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Oct 4 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Oct 18 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Nov 1 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Fri Nov 11 VETERAN'S DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Office Closed Tues Nov 15 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thur Nov 24 THANKSGIVING DAY HOLDIAY OBSERVED - City Hall Office Closed Fri Nov 25 DAY AFTER THANKSGIVING DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Office Closed Tues Dec 6 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Dec 20 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Dec 26 CHRISTMAS HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Office Closed MINTUES OF THE JOINT rAETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND THE EDINA:CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL AUGUST 16, 2005 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering roll'call were Commissioner/Member Housh, Masica, Swenson and Chair Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner/Member Masica and seconded by Commissioner/Member Housh approving the Consent Agenda for the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR AUGUST 2, 2005, APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner/Member Masica and seconded by Commissioner/Member Housh approving the Minutes of the regular meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for August 2, 2005. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. HRA RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -2 SALE APPROVED FOR PUBLIC PROJECT REVENUE BONDS — SERIES 2005 Director Hughes introduced Mark Ruff from Ehlers and Associates that presented results of the sale of the Public Project Revenue Bonds. Mr. Ruff said the Bonds will be issued by the HRA for two gymnasiums that will be constructed on the school facility site. The total amount of the bond issue was $5,425,000 of Public Project Revenue Bonds. Mr. Ruff indicated that five bids were received with the lowest bidder, Piper Jaffray & Co., at a 4.0579 % interest rate on the twenty year bonds. He explained these revenue bonds have a slightly lower bond rating than general obligation bonds but still have an excellent rating of Aa. The range of bids on the twenty year bonds was from 4 % to 4 %2 %. Mr. Ruff said fees were less than anticipated as well as the true interest rate lower with over the life of the issue would be about $265,000. Mr. Ruff recommended sale of the bonds to Piper Jaffray & Company providing for the issuance and sale of $5,425,000 of Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2005. He added the closing on the Bonds would be September 13, 2005. Commissioner/Member Housh made a motion approving HRA Resolution No. 2005 -2, authorizing Revenue Bonds, Series 2005 City Of Edina annual appropriation lease obligations. Commissioner/Member Swenson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -71. APPROVING THE BOND. SALE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A LEASE AGREEMENT PROVIDING for THE CONSTRUCTION OF GYMNASIUMS AND THE LEASE THEREOF BY THE CITY. AND APPROVING THE FORM OF A RESOLUTION AND AN OFFICIAL STATEMENT Mark Ruff recommended adoption of the resolution authorizing construction of the gymnasiums at the Community Center as well as the lease by the City for the gymnasiums. Commissioner/Member Masica made a motion adopting Resolution No. 2005 -71 Authorizing the Execution of a Lease Agreement Providing for the Construction of Gymnasiums and the Lease Thereof by the City, and Approving the Form of a Resolution and an Official Statement. Commissioner/Member Housh seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION. NO. 2005 -70 APPROVING THE BOND SALE FOR GENERAL OBLIGATION PERMANENT. IMPROVEMENT REVOLVING. FUND. BONDS — SERIES 2005E Mark Ruff, Ehlers & Associates indicated that the General Obligation Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Bonds, Series 2005E, were sold to Piper Jaffray & Company at a true interest cost of $1,460,000. Five bids were received on the ten year bonds at a true interest cost of $3.5851 %. Mr. Ruff added when bids are taken, bids are calculated on the basis of interest rates and ease. The bond buyers note the "reoffering yield" and noted little difference between the AAA General Obligation Bonds and the Revenue Bonds. This demonstrates the bond buying public has a high regard for the City of Edina. Mr. Ruff recommended approval of the Bond Sale for the General Obligation Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Bonds — Series 2005 E to Piper Jaffray & Associates at $1,460,000. Commissioner/Member /Swenson made a motion adopting Resolution No. 2005 -70 Awarding Sale, Prescribing the Form and Details and Providing for the Payment of $1,460,000 General Obligation Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Bonds, Series 2005E. Commissioner/ Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda, Chair/ Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 7:12 P.M. Executive Director 2 0 REPORUREC OMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item HRA H, COUNCIL II.A. & VI.C. From: GORDON L. HUGHES Consent ❑ CITY MANAGER Information Only F-1 Date: SEPTEMBER 6, 2005 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: HAUGLAND DEVELOPMENT ® Motion 1. TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ❑ Resolution 2. VACATION PUBLIC UTILITY ❑ Ordinance 3. CONVEYANCE OF PUBLIC RIGHT 1:1 Discussion OF WAY RECOMMENDATION: HRA II. Authorize conveyance to 5000 France LLC subject to reservation of easements as appropriate. City Council IIA. Vacate utility easement City Council VIC. Authorize conveyance to 5000 France LLC subject to reservation of easements as appropriate. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: On May 3, 2005, the City Council approved a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for the redevelopment proposal of the Haugland Companies at 50`h and France. This approval was granted conditioned upon "platting the property to incorporate all easements, vacations and dedications." On August 2, 2005, the HRA and the City Council called for public hearings for the purpose of conveying certain properties and vacating certain easements to facilitate construction of the project. The HRA and Council should consider the following actions: REPORT/RECOMMENDATION — Haugland Development September 6, 2005 Page two HRA: The HRA should convey tw6 parcels of property to 5000 France -LLC (a corporation created by Haugland to undertake the project.) These parcels are shown on Exhibit 1. (Agenda item HRA II.) CITY: The Council should vacate the utility easement shown on Exhibit 2. (Agenda item IIA). The Council should also convey to 5000 France LLC the parcel shown on. Exhibit 3. (Agenda item VIC.) The HRA and City conveyances should be conditioned upon the reservation of easements as appropriate for existing utilities and rights of way. New easements will be rededicated when the final plat of the property is filed following substantial completion of the project. ° o a � o G PROPOSED DIVISION 64342 -001 142 -7 656/12 .% 41 - J4,4 mN H X. W N O 0d us WLICENSE AND AGRAEMENT BC iw[EN ~ I �fHOUSI THEATRE CDRPORA710N AND O I? b d O / NOUSNG AND RE DCVEIOPMENT VI _ u _ J AUTHORITY 0( FDINA MINNESOTA Q p - F = '- 1y ° d p PER DOC. N0. 4240621 Q s. Z M1 PUBLIC WALKWAY EASE MENI PER W s< DOC. NO 429x177 PERMIT FOR PUBLIC WALKWAY JO OYFRNANG (XCROACHM[NT INTO I W ._, CASEMENT PER OOC. N0. Z EASE PER DOC? NO. W I 5+14216 BLDG, NT. 0.1 � �/� /�/� ° �29�176 p ? 53.00 FT. \ ° BLDG. Nl� I J 1.90 •7l.N/ — JW .O 50 G 5.00 d ° d e ^ .10 FT. v : • I F r d WEST LINE OF THE E.. OF I I _ I In EAST 150 FEfi _ .- 701.42- — — — F SIGN 1j _ 1 _ I'(� • O ODNCRE iE Y I �o `obi ° % W Z N ¢x7 J� O 10116 I d Z d ° _ 1LOT 45 I _ -' ° °? ��4 'Y I —150— — — EXTSTMG- SUrMll � J i , ��,d�`� " f I 5020 FRANCE AVE. SOUTH a�y� I d W� `I t I I 2755 SO. FT. I o ° °_ I I L EAST LINE er. ,.,I I OF LOT o45 1.1 d° ° d Ra _ o C111, I I I �--- -- O O 0. Gam' STORY I ° W I G RAMP I �- P A R t E I 0.67 UNL a� I/ j- a a Ig d d o lIl � ° d ry p `T".)y 5 � p N N - I _I. / - _. _:_ _ 5 7H LIAPk' ":Of.;...LE OT�'45: .efF 1 4 1 ,1 \ NL= —GN I ° 5.81 4 I m �7.7Y 86 t�.W °'� d I d PI W.T. A DEc..,.VE I I BRICK I 0 d ,u, o d II I I I EXISTING BUILDING I I I ° d ° o I I I I I d o d I I I o I I I I o I I I I I d I I I I I d ° d d JI I SOUTH LINE OF LOT �5— I I— o 1 1 �6SO�E 1 j a d UNKNOWN RI ° d d C Ft. This drawing has ,been checked and AREA: 1,108 S 4• reviewed this ci _ day of 0.025 Ac. �y 20 . by lopffiED DIVISION 164342 -007 fi� -, COKRE I N'SO'N 150.00 40 DECORATIVE I BRKX a 11.�11111117777771111111111111lr 11111117777777711717,711 f �a EXISTING BUILDING ° o l d o C5 CL d d c o I o < o I d a d ° I o SOUTH LINE OF LOT • -- �7 G \ j ° Q UNR NOMN O AREA: 709 Sq. Ft. 0.016 Ac. d d I° This drawing has been checked and reviewed this ate' day of A'nuA 20-.S!5 . by ... I � u• e J —o G �ZN 8 O / N J O Q I J -C J4 I i O <Z I LICENSE AND AGRREMENT 04AND [DMA 7N[AlR[ [diPORA /qN AND NouSMO AND RED[VELOPMENT AUlHOR1TY a [DINA YMMESOIA PER DOC. NO. 4240611 ?` PUBLIC WALKWAY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 4294177 PERMIT FOR OVERHANG ENOtOAGWENI MTO EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. , SAN216 E1. S 00 I^ I I IA 7 r DE) N J O O < V 4 J O W Q J b Jl J3 A • :-ry ,>- 4G.D0, H r i 0 V e ? 1- rry JN i _ Y. R W O r �' Z O O Y ` 7i jO Z 0 3� `� ` M In W�(OOiII O Q ° d d d o d O d COKRE I N'SO'N 150.00 40 DECORATIVE I BRKX a 11.�11111117777771111111111111lr 11111117777777711717,711 f �a EXISTING BUILDING ° o l d o C5 CL d d c o I o < o I d a d ° I o SOUTH LINE OF LOT • -- �7 G \ j ° Q UNR NOMN O AREA: 709 Sq. Ft. 0.016 Ac. d d I° This drawing has been checked and reviewed this ate' day of A'nuA 20-.S!5 . by IVISION 64342-.001 I S� O LICENSE AND AORREMEN7 BETWEEN �ZN a3m O r - 00 EDINA THEATRE CORPORATION AND HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT N J IUINORITY OF EDINA MINNESO7A I O O I PER DOC. NO. 1210671 = MN W° Jla/1 PUBLIC WALKWAY EASEMENT PER W I DOC. NO. 1291177 PERM17 FOR y� 1./ N ° OVERHANG ENCROACHMENT INTO I Q Iz = I EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 5111216 BLDG. HT. W, D.I 57.00 FT. V� I IVISION 64342-.001 AREA: 709 Sq. Ft. 0.016 Ac. °s nll I' -rae .F- as a- _�- .`9l•h'ItlE::;�� b .� In Ir W 00 In I • , BUILDING EXISTING 1 5020 FRANCE AVE. SOUTH A 1 2755 SO. FT. .,soon — , -j BRIOII EXISTING BUILDING SOUTH LINE OF LOT 45— �_ I. SWW*5o'E 1 OF LOT °45 10.61 14 � d Z ° I �g d, ®i� a Td d a I d d c o I d ° ^o d d 1 1 ° 142 -7 65� I a d d ° I ° 0 d UNKM0IIN MN d d I ° ' This drawing has been checked and reviewed this 8♦�' day of uS 20-05 . by a -j 2..,..,ai 6Q �ZN a3m / �r mf 4W / InL�1 ° 0 4 D ° WV d vh W O MN W° r 00 1 .i b .11 a JfV d LD y� 1./ N Q ¢, 0 s 3. n d W, Rb zM°i 7i' d V� I a z D. J SM '500E s1.W AREA: 709 Sq. Ft. 0.016 Ac. °s nll I' -rae .F- as a- _�- .`9l•h'ItlE::;�� b .� In Ir W 00 In I • , BUILDING EXISTING 1 5020 FRANCE AVE. SOUTH A 1 2755 SO. FT. .,soon — , -j BRIOII EXISTING BUILDING SOUTH LINE OF LOT 45— �_ I. SWW*5o'E 1 OF LOT °45 10.61 14 � d Z ° I �g d, ®i� a Td d a I d d c o I d ° ^o d d 1 1 ° 142 -7 65� I a d d ° I ° 0 d UNKM0IIN MN d d I ° ' This drawing has been checked and reviewed this 8♦�' day of uS 20-05 . by a -j 2..,..,ai • CITY OF EDINA i . i 8/17/2005 13:54:06 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page : 7 8/18/2005 - 8/18/2005 I Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 13948 8/1812005 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 737.50 LEGAL-SERVICES, 118412 1250185 _ 9134.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL GRANDVIEW TAX DISTRICT 737.50 737.50 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 737.50 Total Payments 737.50' l 1 i i i R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/17/2005 13:54:12 Council Check Summary Page - 1 Company 09000 HRA FUND Amount 737.50 Report Totals 737.50 8/18/2005 - 8/18/2005 Arc r. We oonfirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and proced s date l0 , n City O e • ,�c�RBPBUe ���/ PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, September 17, 2005, marks the two hundred nineteenth anniversary of the drafting of the Constitution of the United States of America by the Constitutional Convention; and WHEREAS, it is fitting and proper to accord official recognition to this magnificent document and its memorable anniversary; and to the patriotic celebration which will commemorate the occasion; and WHEREAS, Public Law 915 guarantees the issuing of a proclamation each year by the President of the United States of America designating September 17 through 23 as Constitution Week. THEREFORE, 1, James R. Hovland, by virtue of the authority vested in me as Mayor of the City of Edina do hereby proclaim the week of September 17 through 23 as CONSTITUTION WEEK and urge all citizens to study the Constitution and reflect on the privilege of being an American with all the rights and responsibilities which that privilege involves. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Edina to be affixed this 6`" day of September in the year of our Lord, two thousand five. James R. Hovland, Mayor ,03.. A. �l oe v • I�Colt POP.A� '� • ,ase ROTARY CLUB OF EDINA PRESENTATION TO EDINA FIRE DEPARTMENT No packet data ❑ Oral presentation 1-1 Information coming MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL :MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL AUGUST 16, 2005 5:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Housh, Masica and Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Manager Hughes gave an overview of the 2006 budget and the significant changes from the 2005 budget. Member. Masica asked if it would be appropriate to discuss Council salaries at the meeting. Manager Hughes said it would be appropriate to discuss if time allows after the public hearing. Member Masica noted that absentee voting is costly and suggested that absentee voting might be increasing because it is more of a convenience than a necessity. Manager Hughes said he could not comment on the matter, but could get more information for the Council at a future meeting. Member Housh said that if absentee voting increases voter participation, it is money well spent. Member Housh encouraged staff to leverage vendor relationships to the enterprise funds to reduce costs. Mayor Hovland asked for more information about the City's contributions to PERA. Joni Kelly Bennett, Lynn Ave., reported that the Transportation Commission at a special meeting Aug. 11 voted to recommend to the Council $50,000 be spent for a study of West 70th Street. The Commission ranked the area around Edina High School as its top priority, followed by West 70th Street and northeast Edina. Because studies of the area around Edina High School and northeast Edina are currently being studied, the Commission believes money should be spent to study West 70th Street in 2006. Wayne Prochniak, 5912 Dewey Hill Road, Chairman of Human Rights & Relations Commission, presented the group's recommendations to fund nine agencies and a one- time $1,000 grant to the Edina A Better Chance Foundation. The nine agencies to be funded are Senior Community Services ($26,200), Cornerstone ($15,000), Volunteers Enlisted to Assist People ($16,800), Women in Transition ($4,600), Minneapolis Mediation Program ($5,000), Ministry for Healing and Wholeness ($5,400), The Bridge ($2,200), Store to Door ($3,100) and Neighborhood Partnerships ($4,600). 1 Neighborhood Partnerships is a program that has not received funding in the past. Neighborhood Partnerships provides home living assistance to elderly and disabled persons, following Normandale Center's Care Team model. Neighborhood Partnerships was the recipient of a State grant to link agencies within Edina to further demonstrate the value and effectiveness of supportive services for the health of seniors. Allocations of $141,130 represent a 2 percent increase in funding. The HRRC recommendation also includes an allocation of $23,191 to the RPC to complete the work of the Affordable Housing Task Force. Council members asked for an update on the work of the task force. Prochniak admitted that there is not a lot to show for the study to date, as the original consultant hired to do the project had been terminated. Manager Hughes expressed concern with the Commission's recommendation to give a grant to the ABC Foundation, as the City is prohibited from making gifts. The grant recommendation will be reviewed by the City Attorney. The Council asked why $75,000 had been budgeted for an additional building inspector. Manager Hughes _explained that the number of building permits is not decreasing on an annual basis, but continues to remain steady. In order to maintain a good level of customer service, it is necessary to add additional staff. The Council discussed its salaries. Member Housh indicated that he would like to see the mayor's salary increased (with no increase for Council members) OR see Council salaries eliminated altogether since he does not feel people run for Council for the money. Member Swenson said she feels salaries should be increased because some people who are qualified might not be able to afford the duties associated with being a member of the Council (lunches, memberships, campaigns) without those funds. Member Masica asked for an explanation of the Central Services budget. Member Masica asked if the increase in asphalt was related to the increase in oil prices. Director Houle explained that the increase is due to both oil prices and $65,000 for additional street maintenance. Member Masica asked why there is a projected increase in the cost of . salt. Director Houle said that the Public Works Department anticipates the need for more salt than has been used in the past. Member Masica asked if the City pays NSP rent to locate street lights on the electric company's poles. Director Houle responded in the affirmative. 2 Member Masica asked how the property owners at 50th & France are assessed for maintenance. Manager Hughes explained that property owners in the downtown area are directly assessed for the costs. Member Masica asked if overtime costs have decreased because of the opening of the South Metro Public Safety Training Center. Chief Siitari said he does not believe that the Training Center has yet decreased overtime costs. Mayor Hovland asked if the proposed part -time staff is necessary because of additional state or federal reporting requirements. Chief Siitari said that most statements must now be transcribed. In the past two years, the number of pages transcribed by the Department has doubled. Member Masica asked if fire prevention education directly results in a reduction in fire calls. Chief Scheerer said he has seen a 2 percent reduction in fire calls since additional educational programs were put into place. Member Masica asked if the Fire Department has enjoyed an overtime savings with the opening of the South Metro Public Safety Training Center. Chief Scheerer said he has seen a reduction and believes there has been some savings as a result of the center. Mayor Hovland asked Chief Siitari to comment on the civil defense and animal control budget increases. Chief Siitari explained that the civil defense increases are a result of an accounting increase and the animal control budget has increased as a result of a step increase in the animal control officer's salary. Member. Housh asked how many ice rinks are maintained under the budget. Director Keprios said 11 outdoor rinks are maintained. Member Masica asked if the Senior Center is self- sufficient. Director Keprios said it is not yet self- sufficient, but said additional revenues in building rentals and programs are helping to close the gap. Member Swenson reminded the Council that the Park Maintenance Department is operating with one less person than it has in the past. Mayor Hovland asked if the Department has considered establishing a senior volunteer corps to help with park maintenance activities. Director Keprios said he has not, mostly because of safety concerns. However, the City has an Adopt -A -Park program that assists with park clean- up, alleviating some stress on the department. Member Masica asked how much of the contingency budget was used last year. Manager Hughes said $91,000 was used in 2004 and said a lot would be used in 2005 because funds will be used for a transportation study. K Member Masica asked how much riders are charged for the Dial -A -Ride program. Manager Hughes said riders are charged $2 per ride, per way. Member. Masica asked how many deer are eliminated each year during the deer management program. Manager Hughes said approximately 30 deer are removed each fall or winter. The exact number is determined by air surveys. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 6:47 P.M. Assistant City. Manager 4 I MINUTES OF THE JOINT MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL AUGUST 16, 2005 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Housh, Masica, Swenson and Chair /Mayor Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh approving the Council Consent Agenda with the exception of Agenda Item VI.F. Traffic Safety Staff Report of August 2, 2005. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 2 2005 AND SPECIAL MEETINGS OF TULY 5, 2005, TULY 19, 2005, AND AUGUST 2 2005 APPROVED Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh approving the Minutes of the regular meeting for August 2, 2005 and Special Meetings of July 5, 2005, July 19, 2005, and August 2, 2005. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. HRA RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -2 SALE APPROVED FOR PUBLIC PROTECT REVENUE BONDS - SERIES 2005 Manager Hughes introduced Mr. Ruff from Ehlers and Associates that presented results of the sale of the Public Project Revenue Bonds. Mr. Ruff said the Bonds will be issued by the HRA for two gymnasiums that will be constructed on the school facility site. The total amount of the bond issue was $5,425,000 of Public Project Revenue Bonds. Mr. Ruff indicated that five bids were received with the lowest bidder, Piper Jaffray & Co., at a 4.0579 % interest rate on the twenty year bonds. He explained these revenue bonds have a slightly lower bond rating than general obligation bonds but still have an excellent rating of Aa. The range of bids on the twenty year bonds was from 4 % to 41/2 %. Mr. Ruff said fees were less than anticipated as well as the true interest rate lower with over the life of the issue would be about $265,000. Mr. Ruff recommended sale of the bonds to Piper Jaffray & Company providing for the issuance and sale of $5,425,000 of Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2005. He added the closing on the Bonds would be September 13, 2005. Member Housh made a motion approving HRA Resolution No. 2005 -2, authorizing Revenue Bonds, Series 2005 City Of Edina annual appropriation lease obligations. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -71 APPROVING THE BOND SALE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A LEASE AGREEMENT PROVIDING for THE CONSTRUCTION OF GYMNASIUMS AND THE LEASE THEREOF BY THE CITY AND APPROVING THE FORM OF A RESOLUTION AND AN OFFICIAL STATEMENT Mr. Ruff recommended adoption of the resolution authorizing construction of the gymnasiums at the Community Center as well as the lease by the City for the gymnasiums. Page 1 Minutes/Edina City Council/August 16, 2005 Member Masica made a motion adopting Resolution No. 2005 -71 Authorizing the Execution of a Lease Agreement Providing for the Construction of Gymnasiums and the Lease Thereof by the City, and Approving the Form of a Resolution and an Official Statement. Member Housh seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -70 APPROVING THE BOND SALE FOR GENERAL OBLIGATION PERMANENT IMPROVEMENT REVOLVING FUND BONDS - SERIES 2005E Mr. Ruff, Ehlers & Associates .indicated that the General Obligation Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Bonds, Series 2005E, were sold to Piper Jaffray & Company at a true interest cost of $1,460,000. Five bids were received on the ten year bonds at a true interest cost of $3.5851 %. Mr. Ruff added when bids were taken, bids were calculated on the basis of interest rates and ease. The bond buyers note the "reoffering yield" and noted little difference between the AAA General Obligation Bonds and the Revenue Bonds. This demonstrates the bond buying public has a high regard for the City of Edina. Mr. Ruff recommended approval of the Bond Sale for the General Obligation Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Bonds - Series 2005 E to Piper Jaffray & Associates at $1,460,000. Member /Swenson made a motion adopting Resolution No. 2005 -70 Awarding Sale, Prescribing the Form and Details and Providing for the . Payment of $1,460,000 General Obligation Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Bonds, Series. 2005E. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. EDINBOROUGH PARK AWARDED MINNESOTA RECREATION AND PARK ASSOCIATION AWARD OF EXCELLENCE FOR PASSPORT TO PLAY Adaptive Recreation Supervisor from the City of Eden Prairie, Nicole White, presented the Award of Excellence from the Minnesota Recreation and Park Association (MRPA) to the City of Edina, Edinborough Park, for participation in a new marketing program,' "Passport to Play ". She explained "Passport to Play" was a creative marketing collaborative between the cities of Edina, New Brighton, Eagan and Woodbury and was designed to encourage visits to the four facilities. EDINA FIRE DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL RECOGNIZED FOR CONFINED SPACE RESCUE Chief Scheerer presented five Edina Fire Fighters with a commendation for a 35 foot confined space rescue in Eden Prairie of a volunteer firefighter from Brooklyn Park. The five Fire Fighters were Darrell Todd, Jeff Garfin, Pat Sanden, Dominic Hadzima and Pete Fisher. VACATION OF PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT APPROVED - 5532 VERNON AVENUE Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Engineer Houle indicated the owner of the property at 5532 Vernon Avenue requested a partial vacation of an existing utility easement. The subject property was located in the northwest part of Edina. Mr. Houle explained the owner wished, to reconstruct the existing garage. The location of the home, in relation to the westerly property line would not provide enough space for a two -car garage without encroaching into the existing five -foot easement. Mr. Houle explained Edina utilities, Centerpoint Energy, Xcel Energy, Qwest and Time Warner Cable have examined and did Page 2 Minutes/Edina City Council/August 16, 2005 not object to the vacation. He indicated the three foot easement maintained by the City would allow the utilities the ability to do a directional drill within the remaining footage, if required. He concluded staff recommended approval of the vacation of a portion of the utility easement to accommodate the new garage. Member Housh questioned whether the portion "of the utility easement the City was maintaining was City driven. Mr. Houle said yes. Member Swenson asked if with the three foot setback of the garage could be placed on the lot line, if the garage was not attached to the house. Mr. Houle said that was correct. Michael Damon, 5532 Vernon Avenue, said he was looking forward to a double garage on his property. No public comments were received. Member Housh made a motion closing the public hearing, seconded by Member Masica. Ayes: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Masica introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2005-72 VACATING OF EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT 5532 VERNON AVENUE WHEREAS, a motion of the City Council, on the July 19, 2005, fixed a date for a public hearing on a proposed vacation of utility easements; and WHEREAS, two weeks published and posted notice of said hearing was given and the hearing was held on August 16, 2005, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City and of the public that said vacation be made; and WHEREAS, the Council considered the. extent the vacation affects existing easements within the area of the vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any persons, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric, telephone or cable television poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation to continue maintaining the same, or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove or otherwise attend thereto: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, that the following described public utility easements are hereby vacated effective as of August 16, 2005: PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT TO BE VACATED: That part of the Westerly five foot utility easement on Lot 8, Block 1, Danijohn's Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: The East 2 feet of the South 30 feet of the North 33 feet of said Utility Easement. Page 3 Minutes/Edina City Council/August 16, 2005 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause a notice of completion of proceedings to be prepared, entered in the transfer record of the County Auditor, and filed with the County Recorder, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851. Passed and adopted this 16th day of August, 2005. Member Housh seconded the motion. Rollcall: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -73 APPROVED, GRANTING PRELIMINARY REZONING PRELIMINARY PLAT, AMENDMENT TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR RIVERVIEW COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES - 50TH STREET AND INDIANOLA AVENUE Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Planner: Planner Larsen informed the Council the subject properties were located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Indianola Avenue and West 50th Street. He stated the proponent planned to remove the existing 9 -unit apartment building and 9 -stall parking garage located at 4121 West 50th Street, realign property lines (4121 West 50th Street and 5017 Indianola) between the parcels, and construct a new 6 -unit condominium building. Mr. Larsen noted that several variances would be necessary; 1) replacing a building that was non- conforming in regard to density, building setback, parking and lot coverage, and 2) maintaining the single dwelling lot to the south preserves the relationship between multi- family and single family land uses. He said staff recommended the following actions: 1) Amend Comprehensive Plan by adding "the north 28 feet of 5017 Indianola Avenue to High - Density Residential, 2) grant, the preliminary rezoning for the same parcel and redevelopment plan, 3) approval the Preliminary Plat, 4) grant the lot width and lot area variance for the single dwelling lot, and 5) consider vacation of alley right -of -way. Mr. Larsen said all approvals would be preliminary and be conditioned upon a Final Rezoning approval and a Final Plat Approval at a future date. In addition, Mr. Larsen noted the project would need three setback variances, from 50th Street and on both side yards. He explained the Planning Commission had studied similar circumstances in the area and recommended Amending the Comprehensive Plan, Preliminary Rezoning, Preliminary Plat approval, Lot width and necessary setback variances, all subject to Final approvals for rezoning of the plat. Presentation by Proponent: Chris Cowen, Riverview Commercial Properties, developer, introduced Dean Dovolis, DJR Architects, Barry Berg and John Wanninger, Edina Realty, who will market the proposed project, and Don Engebretson and Scott Ellingboe the landscape architects of the project. Chris Cowen, 5015 13th Avenue South, Minneapolis, indicated the purpose of the proposal was to create a unique living opportunity in the 50th & France vicinity. The building will house modest sized housing units with six large one level units. The concept was for long -time Edina residents seeking a one -level living opportunity of this size and scale. Dean Dovolis, 5009 Ridge Road, presented floor plans of the proposed units and an artist depiction of the scale of the building in conjunction with the neighboring buildings. A neighbor requested a single family home be constructed where the existing home was as a transition to the proposed Page 4 Minutes/Edina City Council/August 16, 2005 condominium building. Mr. Dovolis showed a rendering of a four bedroom, single family home with a three car garage that was planned for -the site, noting the home would not require a variance. Mr. Dovolis added, that the condominiumn site would have a reflecting pool and fountain in addition to landscaping. He said the building would be constructed of a stone base, cedar shakes, and a slate roof with copper roof and details along the lines and consisted of two units per floor facing east and west. Mr. Dovolis stated there would be covered parking for residents with three guest parking spaces outdoors. He added the single family home will be constructed of like materials with the same signature character. Scott Ellingboe, 600, 2nd Street, Minneapolis, and Don Engebretson, 20560 Carson Road, Deephaven, Landscape Designer and Consultant, introduced themselves. Mr. Engebretson said they have an achievable goal for the project that exceeded the typical townhome /condominium style development. He indicated the proposed fountain was large, with ample use of stonework inlays on the grounds as well as container plantings and a waterfall. Mr. Engebretson elaborated that his intention was to create a wonderful botanical garden that enhanced the building. He stated his intention was to use year round plantings to maintain interest on the site. Mayor Hovland inquired how drainage issues would be handled on the site. Mr. Dovolis said they have worked with the owners of the Henley building and with the installation of grading and a swale; drainage should flow out of the site. Council Comments: Member Masica inquired whether she should recuse herself from the proceedings because Mr. Dovolis has done design work for her in the past. Attorney Lindgren said he did not believe that was necessary. Member Masica asked how many lots on Indianola were non - conforming and less than the required 75 feet. Mr. Larson said there were two lots immediately west of the subject property and across the street; one lot was a 50 foot lot and one was a 40 foot lot. Member Masica commented the landscape depictions were stunning. She asked if this plan would actually be implemented. Mr. Dovolis said their intent was to follow the landscape plan as nearly as possible. Member Housh asked if he understood that the number of units had been decreased and the square footage of each unit had been increased. Mr. Dovolis said there would be six units in the condominium building and one single family dwelling. Member Housh said typically the Planning Commission would not recommend a proposed plan with this number of variances, but the existing facility was non - conforming. Mr. Larsen agreed the new building would be improving the site as far as density and parking. Member Housh asked about the proposed building height. Mr. Dovolis said the proposed building was similar to the Henley, and shorter than the church. Member Swenson noted she did not see a sidewalk depicted on the plan. Mr. Dovolis indicated yes a sidewalk would be installed. Member Swenson voiced concern with Indianola being a narrow street and whether adequate outside parking was adequate. She suggested consideration of a shared driveway with the single family dwelling. Mr. Dovolis reiterated their desire to have more green transition to the building rather than additional parking. Member Swenson voiced concern that four spaces would not be enough during peak times because of the day care and would create a safety issue. Mr. Larsen said a proof of parking clause could force the owner to put in extra parking stalls. Member Swenson asked assurance that the sidewalk was a sure thing. Mr. Dovolis said he would like the parking to continue to 50th Street. Member Swenson asked what the Page 5 Minutes/Edina City Council/August 16, 2005. monthly rent was for the building presently. Chris Cowen, owner of the existing building, said rents were approximately $900 monthly. Mayor Hovland asked how many trees would be removed. Mr. Engebretson said three diseased elm trees would be removed and one that presently was surrounded by asphalt would be removed. He added that they plan to move and relocate some trees within the lot. Mayor Hovland inquired what the hardship was for the developer that warrants the issuance of the variances. Mr. Larsen said the Planning Commission looked at the property right that has been shared by other properties in similar situations in the area and he believed it was the City's Ordinance that created the hardship as opposed to the neighborhood or new development. Member Swenson stated that Planning Commission Member McClellan made a great statement, ... "we haven't really changed how we looked at properties like this that were in redevelopment areas and there were restraints on redevelopment that maybe we don t want any more." Mayor Hovland said the site was clearly more urban than suburban. He questioned whether the Planning Commission should take a look at an urban redevelopment plan in light of the developments being considered around 50th & France. Mr. Larsen said multi- family zoning districts could be created that vary from one area to another. Mayor Hovland asked if the proposed building was taller than the Henley. Mr. Dovolis said the Henley has more of a continuous ridge line where the proposed building has animated lines with more gables and peaks. Mayor Hovland asked if parking on the site meets the Ordinance requirements. Mr. Larsen . said yes. Member Masica said upon examination of the packet information, the developer was asking for; 1). Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, 2) Replat and vacation of an alley, 3) 6 1/2 % coverage variance, 4) Setback variance for the building in aggregate of 30 feet, 5) 17 feet in aggregate for parking setback variances and 6) requesting a 1/3 lot width reduction for the single family lot. She noted no mention in the Planning Commission of hardship. In City Code 810.05, Subd.,1, E. and F., Regulating Variances, provides for....'a granting of variances if it will result in approved plat and will not alter the essential character of the land'. She. stated the proposed project does meet those requirements. Ginny Anderson, Anderson Architects, 5029 Indianola, indicated she has met with the architect as well as several neighbors regarding the project. She added the architect has the neighborhood's best interests in mind. She asked what control the City has with no review board over the materials that were approved and the materials installed. Mayor Hovland said at final review, design standards must be met. Ms. Anderson noted that parking on Indianola was still a concern but the fountain on the site was more beneficial than two parking spaces. Mayor Hovland inquired whether construction of the single family home with no variances could be made a condition of approval of the proposal. Mr. Larsen said yes. Mark John, 5007 Arden Avenue, noted his home abutted Edina Covenant Church. He initially voiced concern with how close the proposed building would be to Indianola or 50th Street. He complimented the proponent and gave full endorsement to the plan. He asked how long the project will take. Mr. Dovolis said construction will take approximately a year. Bob Larson, 5037 Indianola, suggested, 1) concern with run -off on the single family site because of low area, 2) Indianola has no sidewalks and they would not fit the neighborhood, and 3) the Page 6 Minutes/Edina City Council/August 16, 2005 planned off -street parking should be kept along Indianola, and 4) green space fits the neighborhood. Steve Barsch, 5021 Indianola, stated that Mr. Cowen has been very professional in his dealings with the residents. He voiced full support of the plan. Member Housh closed the public hearing, seconded by Member Swenson. Ayes: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Housh said he concurred with comments from the residents and supports the proposal. Member Masica congratulated the pro -active design team. She said the proposed green space out- weighs the need for more than four parking spaces. She suggested the sidewalk be continued to family property on the south end of the site. Mayor Hovland commended the proponent with the plan but, he would, condition approval on no variances be sought on the single family lot. He concurs with the amount of green space and that all parking requirements were met and said sidewalks would keep the traffic and pedestrians separate. Member Swenson indicated the Council would like the plan maintained as portrayed at this meeting, and commented they do not like surprises. Member Swenson introduced the Resolution No. 2005 -73, and moved its approval of a 6 -unit condominium building at 4121 50th Street West and 5017 Indianola Avenue, conditioned upon, 1) Amending the Comprehensive Plan by adding the north 28 feet of 5017 Indianola Avenue to High Density Residential, 2) Final Rezoning for above parcel and redevelopment plan, 3) Final Plat Approval, 4) Lot width and lot area variance for single dwelling lot, 5) vacation of alley right -of -way, 6) no variance on the new single family building site, and 7) sidewalk extending through the site: RESOLUTION NO. 2005-73 PRELIMINARY REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT AND AMENDMENT TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR RIVERVIEW COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES 50TH STREET AND INDIANOLA AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled, RIVERVIEW FIRST ADDITION, platted by RIVERVIEW COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES, LLC ", and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council on August 16, 2005, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval with seven conditions: 1) Amend Comprehensive Plan by adding the north 28 feet of 5017 Indianola Avenue to High Density Residential, 2) Final Rezoning for above parcel, and redevelopment plan, 3) Final Plat Approval, 4) Lot width and lot area variance for single dwelling lot, 5) Vacation of alley right-of-way, 6) no variance on the new single family building site, and 7) sidewalk extending through the site. Passed and adopted this 16th day of August, 2005. Member Housh seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 7 Minutes/Edina City Council/Au ,gust 16, 2005 Member Swenson made a motion to grant first reading to Ordinance No. 850 -A -26 conditioned upon, 1) Amending the Comprehensive Plan by adding the north 28 feet of 5017 Indianola Avenue to High Density Residential, 2) Final Rezoning for above parcel and redevelopment plan, 3) Final Plat Approval, 4) Lot width anc lot area variance for single dwelling lot, 5) vacation of alley right -of -way, 6) no variance on the new single family building site, and 7) sidewalk extending through the site: Member Housh seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *HEARING DATE SET OF SEPTEMBER 6, 2005 - APPEAL OF DECISION OF ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FOR ACCREDITED INVESTORS, INC - 5200 WEST 73RD STREET Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh setting September 6, 2005, as hearing date for appeal of decision of Zoning Board of Appeals for Accredited Investors, Inc., 5200 West 73rd Street. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NO, 2005 -8 OF CITY CODE APPROVED - ADDING NEW SECTION 1221 - EDINA ART CENTER BOARD Mr. Hughes reminded the Council at the July 19, 2005, meeting, the Council received a report, testimony and recommendations regarding formalizing the Edina Art Center Board and the Edina Public Art Committee. Following a brief Council discussion, Member Housh moved adoption of Ordinance No. 2005 -8 an Ordinance Amending the City Code by Adding a New Section 1221, Art Center Board, with waiver of second reading: ORDINANCE NO. 2005-8 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE BY ADDING A NEW SECTION 1221 ART CENTER BOARD THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. The City Code is hereby amended by adding a new Section 1221. as follows: "Section 1221 -Art Center Board 1221.01 Establishment. The Council, finding that the encouragement and enhancement of the arts in Edina is vital to the social and cultural well being of the City and its residents, does hereby establish the Art Center Board (the 'Board "). 1221.02 Duties. The Board shall: A. Make recommendations regarding the operation of the Edina Art Center. B. Plan and recommend to the Council art activities and programs. C. Develop a long term plan directed towards fulfilling the needs and desires of Edina residents with respect to the arts. D. Recommend programs at the Edina Art Center that are responsive to community desires. E. Periodically report to the Council on matters pertaining to the Art Center and public art in Edina. F. Initiate and oversee fundraising activities that benefit the Art Center and public art in Edina. G. Represent the City at community functions pertaining to the visual arts and with similar bodies and organizations involved with the visual arts. Page 8 Minutes/Edina City Council/August 16, 2005 H. Oversee the development and implementation of a public visual arts program in Edina. I. Perform other duties from time4o time directed by the Council. 1221.03 Membership. The Board shall consist of eleven members appointed by the Mayor with the consent of the majority of the Council. One member of the Board may be a high school student. All members of the Board shall be residents of the City except that not more than three members may be non - residents. Members shall be appointed for a term of three years except the student, niember shall be appointed for a one year term. Members shall serve until a successor has been appointed. Upon termination of a member's term, that member's successor ,shall be appointed for the remainder of such term. Members of the Board shall serve without compensation and may resign voluntarily or be removed by a majority vote of the Council pursuant to Section 180 of this Code. Board members who discontinue legal residency in the City may be removed from office by the Mayor with the consent of a majority of the Council. 1221.04 Meetings. All meetings of the Board shall be open to the public, be governed by Robert's Rules of Order, and otherwise be held pursuant to its bylaws. The Board shall hold its regular meetings on such fixed date and in such fixed place as it from time to time shall determine. The minutes of all meetings shall be recorded and a copy thereof transmitted to each member of the Council. 1221.05 Organization. The Board shall: A. Elect from its members a chair and vice chair. B. Adopt such bylaws as shall be necessary or desirable for conduct of its business. C. Appoint a secretary from its membership or request that a staff secretary be furnished by the City. Additional staff may be assigned to the Board by the Manager. 1221.06 Committees. The Board shall establish and appoint members to a Public Art Committee which shall be charged with establishing and implementing a public arts program in the City. The Public Art Committee shall be chaired by a member of the Board who shall be appointed by the Board chair with the consent of the Board. The Board may establish other committees for the purpose of carrying out other Board duties. Section 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: August 16, 2005 Waived August 25, 2005 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Member Swenson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. James B. Hovland, Mayor AWARD OF BID APPROVED FOR SCHAEFER CIRCLE ROADWAY AND UTILITY IMPROVMENTS - CONTRACT NO. ENG. 05 -12 Mr. Hughes explained bids were received for Schaefer Circle roadway and utility improvements at $178,948.00. A petition was received from residents on Schaefer with one hundred percent participation that encouraged the City to include Page 9 Minutes/Edina City Council/August 16, 2005 the cost of curb and gutter within the bid. If the Council elected not to adopt the Special Assessment Policy, the curb and gutter could be deducted from the contract. Member Masica made a motion approving Contract No. ENG 05 -12, Schaefer Circle Roadway and Utility Improvements, Improvement Nos. A -217, SS -419, STS -303, and WM -I43, to recommended low bidder, Penn Contracting, Inc., at $178,948.00. Ayes: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *BID AWARDED FOR WEST 58TH STREET ROADWAY AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS. BA -328, SS -424, STS -304, WM -444, L-45, CONTRACT NO. ENG. 05 -8 Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh for award of bid for street roadway and utility improvements, BA -328, SS -424, STS -304, WM -444 and L-45 for West 58th Street from Concord Avenue to Wooddale Avenue to recommended low bidder, Midwest Asphalt Corporation, at $424,014.18. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR ROOF REPLACEMENT FOR TREATMENT PLANT #1 Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh for award of bid for asphalt roof replacement for water treatment plant No.1, 4521 West 50th Street, Improvement Nos. WM -452, Contract No. PW 054, to recommended low bidder Hunerberg Construction Company at $27,000.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. NEW WINE AND ON -SALE 3.2 BEER LICENSES APPROVED - NOODLES & COMPANY Mr. Hughes indicated the Noodle Shop Company Minnesota, Inc., made application for new wine and 3.2 beer liquor licenses to operate a new restaurant, Noodles & Company at 6531 York Avenue. Necessary paperwork has been filed and applicable fees paid for the license. The Planning, Health and Police Departments have completed their investigation with no negative findings. He said staff recommended issuance of the wine and 3.2 beer on -sale liquor licenses. Mary Beth Pfeiffer, Marketing Director, 6531 York Avenue South, said the Edina Noodles was the sixteenth store in Minnesota. Ms. Pheiffer said they specialize in all types of pastas and salads. Member Masica made a motion approving the new wine and on -sale 3.2 beer licenses for Noodles & Company at 6531 York Avenue. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. HOCKEY RINK AT TODD PARK APPROVED Mayor Hovland gave time parameters to presenters on both the pro /con side of the Todd Park Hockey Rink issue. Member Swenson asked residents to hold their applause and verbal comments from the audience in order to move the discussion along. Director Keprios gave background on the proposed construction of the Todd Park Hockey Rink. At the March 8, 2005, Park Board meeting, it was recommended that Todd Park replace Countryside Park as the eleventh hockey rink in Edina. Countryside was built in the wrong orientation and has substandard soils. The Hockey Association attended the April 12, 2005, Park Board meeting stating their wish that eleven hockey rinks be maintained. They asked that a feasibility study be done on Lewis Park which would have artificial refrigeration and maintained with a Zamboni. The Park Board supported that idea and the Hockey Association would pay for the study. Mr. Keprios said Page 10 Minutes/Edina City Council/Auggst 16, 2005 the request for proposal was sent to seventeen different architects. On May 10, 2005, 294 households were noticed in the Todd Park neighborhood inviting them to attend the May 10, 2005, Park Board meeting. Testimony was taken from the neighborhood at that meeting and the Park Board delayed its decision. At the June 14th Park Board meeting, the topic was again discussed and the Park Board recommended building a hockey rink at Todd Park. On July 13, 2005, Steve Haugland and Mike Wagner from the Hockey Association stated again they did not want to lose the eleventh hockey rink and would prefer Lewis Park. Mr.. Keprios suggested the Park Board hold a special meeting. Chairman Klus called a special meeting on July 26, 2005. No notices were sent. The Hockey Association again stated their necessity of an eleventh rink. The Park Board recommended Todd Park. Mr. Keprios gave a brief history of Todd Park saying the hockey rink was removed from the park in 1983, mainly because of budget constraints. A new park shelter building was constructed in 1996, at Todd Park. Mr. Keprios said there were eleven parks of two acres or less as well as ten neighborhood parks that were between 2 and 25 acres. Todd Park, at over 33 acres, would be classified as a community play field. The City has four large community parks of over 100 acres. Mr. Keprios added that staff wanted the parks to be used by adults and kids and was here to serve the residents. They do support outdoor rinks wherever the community and the Council wanted them constructed. He voiced concern with staff to maintain quality ice beyond the eleventh hockey rink. He reiterated the Park Board's recommendation that an outdoor hockey rink be built at Todd Park in place of the worn hockey rink that was removed at Countryside Park and to maintain the shinny rink at Countryside Park. Member Swenson asked which park has off /on street parking; Mr. Keprios said Arden Park was the only park with on street parking. All rinks were used by the hockey association as depicted on the schedule as presented. Mayor Hovland inquired if a parking lot was planned at Todd Park. Mr. Keprios said no off -street parking was planned. Mayor Hovland asked the level of use of shinny rink at Todd Park. Mr. Keprios said use was minimal because of poor quality ice. Mayor Hovland has usage been determined where recreational ice has been converted to a permanent hockey rink. Mr. Keprios said Strachauer Park has been through that scenario showing an increase in use and added Centennial Lakes Park was the greatest recreational park around. Mayor Hovland asked what the cost was to install a permanent rink and maintain it for a year. Mr. Keprios said approximately $40,000. Vince Cockriel, Park Superintendent, responded that installation would be $25,000 (labor and materials) and approximately $15,000 for lights /poles /wiring. Member Swenson asked what the cost was of the Todd Park warming hut. Mr. Keprios said approximately $200,000. He added similar warming huts were located at Weber, Cornelia and Walnut Ridge, and all hockey rinks have warming huts. Member Swenson asked if boards could be removed in the spring and re- installed in the fall. Mr. Cockriel said yes the boards could be removed, stored and re- installed. Mike Wagner, President of the Hockey Association, 4506 Wooddale Avenue, gave background of the process as previously stated by Mr. Keprios. He noted that there were seventeen members on the Hockey Association and represent the 1300 members who will play hockey during the 2005- 2006 season. Hockey has seen a 14% growth rate and believes it will continue. The growth was attributed to the City providing excellent outdoor and indoor hockey facilities. The Park Board has been receptive to the Association's needs and realizes that eleven rinks were essential. Following a Page 11 Minutes/Edina City Council/August 16, 2005 dialog with the Council clarifying how the Hockey Association came to the opinion that Todd Park was the best option to maintain eleven rinks, Mr. Wagner said the Hockey Association supports the Todd Park location completely at this time: George Klus, Park Board Chair, 5233 Lochloy Drive, said the Park Board has diligently worked to resolve the issue of maintaining eleven sheets of ice in Edina. The Park Board believes this was a community park, has room for a sheet of ice and has a wonderful shelter building. The Park Board feels it was the best park with the best impact on the existing community and the hockey community. Mr. Klus said at some point artificial'Jce will need to be discussed and the permanent rinks could be used for this ice. Following a dialog with the Council clarifying again why Lewis Park was not considered, Mr. Klus said the Park Board discussed Todd, Lewis and Braemar Parks. He said Braemar could use smaller rink but would need a shelter building. The Park Board said no. Lewis Park, with two rinks could be very chewed up and only resurfaced once a day. A building would need to be constructed to store the Zamboni.ice resurfacer. Todd Park was the best location. Council, after a dialog with Mr. Klus, asked what the timeline would be to consider Lewis Park for the hockey rink. Mr. Klus said to consider Lewis, Park, a public hearing would need to be held and there was no time to do that this year, even ' with constructing a portable/ temporary rink. Mr. Keprios said cities with portable rinks have space constraints. Portable rinks were not as safe, require more staff time to remove /replace and maintain, become shabby, crooked, cracked, dirty, and require storage space in the summer. Mr. Cockriel concurred. Resident comments: Patrick Cronin, 11 Cooper Avenue, representing the Hilldale neighborhood, said Todd Park, 1) was not environmental issue, 2) has a wonderful warming house, 3) was located where the kids live, and 4) accommodates adult hockey. He presented five testimonial letters from former Edina hockey players in support of constructing a permanent hockey rink at Todd Park. Residents who spoke in favor of constructing a hockey rink at Todd Park were as follows: David Crosby, 4405 West 44th Street; Jeff Bisson, 9 Cooper Avenue; Michelle Sit, 23 Circle West; Rachel Sit, 23 Circle West; Richard Miller, 5340 Hollywood Road; Chips Gulbranson, 5 Cooper; Molly Cronin, 11 Cooper Avenue; and an unidentified resident. Comments received from residents in favor of Todd Park as the site for a hockey rink were as follows: families need a place to get together; love. Todd Park and support construction of rink; significant expenditure into comfort station; kids will use the local rink; if you build it they will come; Todd Park was perfect; kids will love the rink and can walk there and it will be utilized year round; residents who bought homes around park, knew what they were buying; City owns the park; Park and Recreation did excellent job of evaluating sites; Edina was a well-run City; this was August and there was a time crunch for construction before winter; hockey registration of 1200 + kids begins in a week; trying a temporary solution would be. cost prohibitive; numbers were growing annually; the Edina Park system should not be compared to the Eden Prairie park system; could ten rinks be adequate; and a recreational skating rink would be desirable. Tim Meehan, 5229 Hollywood Road, gave an extensive presentation indicating: Edina was an expensive place to live; want the best use of park space; cannot grow more parks and trees; Todd Park has 33 acres, 5.9 "mowable" acres and 27.1 acres of woods /wetlands surrounded on all sides by homes; Todd Park was developed to capacity; and maintaining Edina's vision of preserving green spaces was imperative. Mr. Meehan presented a petition with numerous signatures. Page 12 Minutes/Edina City Council/August 16, 2005 Katy Meehan, 5229 Hollywood Road, showed aerial photos of alternatives to Todd Park for the proposed hockey rink; Lewis Park - would be the best alternative to Todd Park; Walnut Ridge - room for rinks, has a parking lot and comfort station; Pamela Park - warming house and three parking lots; Highlands - one rink would work with green space; Garden Park - rink would fit, parking lot, no homes affected; Todd Park - homes face rink, no green space, all developed, deciduous trees. She stated she was not against the Park Board or the Hockey Association but believes there were better sites for the rink. Paul Cartier, 6905 Antrim Road, inquired whether a shorter rink had been considered. Gary Rooney, 5224 Hollywood Road, said after a driving tour of Edina Parks, Todd Park was a mess. Mr. Cockriel said Todd Park was not scheduled much and without use, weeds can take over. Residents who spoke against Todd Park as the site for construction of a hockey rink were as follows: James Berry, 4504 Rutledge Avenue; Jill Hartman, 4428 Vandervork; John Rentschler, 10 Circle West; Connie Brimacombe, 4413 Rutledge; Nancy Haley, 4521 Parkside Lane; Doug Hall, 4501 Parkside Lane; and Neal Campion, 4436 Vandervork. Comments against Todd Park were as follows: concern with safety as Todd Park has no off -street parking; asked what was wrong with green space; necessary to have a place for unstructured, spontaneous play for young and old residents; Todd Park was not well used and was the wrong place for a hockey rink; historically the old rink at Todd Park received minimal use; suggested constructing a portable rink; population was aging and use of Todd Park for the community for a garden club, walking /running club, arts /crafts, etc. rather than hockey rink; look at other options; economics compared to use does not add up; no sidewalks; open area at Todd Park was used - keep open park; Park Board seems heavy -handed with their decision; Todd Park has lost trees; proponent of Lewis Park with artificial ice and a Zamboni; could Todd Park be a peat bog - it smells; and a win -win would be construction at Lewis Park or Braemar Park and maintain the shinny rinks. Mr. Klus again stated that eleven sheets of ice were necessary and all that the City staff can maintain. The Park Board special meeting was called to make sure Todd Park was the right decision for the eleventh sheet of ice. He said there were safety issues and houses around all the parks and construction of the rink at Todd Park was the recommendation of the Park Board. Allen Carlson, 4424 Vandervork Avenue, said Minneapolis has temporary rinks that work and were safe. He added there was more parking in the summer than in the winter because of snow mounds. Council comments: Member Swenson said growing up she used Division /Todd Park and served on the Blue Ribbon Committee for parks in Edina. She said she does not understand hockey but has a trusted friend on the Park Board, Linda Presthus that she conversed with. Member Swenson said she.walked Todd Park and noted it was a great open space. She suggested constructing a permanent hockey rink at Todd Park for a two year period and further suggested staff study Garden and Lewis Park as possible future sites. Member Housh indicated he ran in the area and sympathized with both sides. He said you look at green space only from the aerial photo, maybe the natural environment was being ignored and he suggested considering the natural environment as green space as well. He said we all love Edina Page 13 Minutes/Edina City Council/August 16, 2005 and said he favors use of temporary boards at Todd Park during the winter. Member Housh said he would support the Park Board's recommendation for an eleventh sheet of ice at Todd Park. He concurred with Member Swenson's suggestion of,a two year period and a study of other sites. Member Masica commented this was a time to take a long term view of what we want in Edina. She said putting a rink at Todd Park was not the best thing for the neighborhood or hockey players. She suggested if the whole community was going to be served with limited tax resources, judgment must not be rushed. Member Masica said she has not heard any compelling reasons why Lewis Park should not be used and she would support Lewis Park. Lewis Park was accessible, has good parking and has one sheet of ice in place as well as future possibilities for additional development. Mayor Hovland stated he did not like problems with no solution. He said there must be a manufacturer that would make seasonal, temporary hockey boards. Mayor Hovland called Todd Park a gem and an under utilized asset in the winter. He said he was torn that there was no win - win solution. He stated he does not like permanent boards. Mayor Hovland said while he concurs with Member Swenson s idea of constructing the rink for a two year period, he does not like spending $40,000. Member Housh suggested installing temporary boards for a period of two years as a test project. Mayor Hovland indicated this was not only a Hockey Association problem it was a neighborhood problem as well In his estimation, going to Lewis or Braemar does not solve the desire of the neighborhood to have a rink. Usage of the park by the neighborhood as well as the Hockey Association could be studied during the two year period. He wondered if in the future other parks would want temporary boards if Todd Park were to get them. Member Swenson said she coached soccer for six years and used the hockey rinks to contain the soccer balls. She noted she knows of many summer uses for the rinks. Member Housh reminded the Council that hockey was growing and that constituted a demand for more ice. Member Masica said she did not want to take away a sheet of ice but she wanted long term possibilities. She said Todd Park was a gem but for the minimal use it will get for a few months versus green space. Member Swenson indicated her idea was to install a rink for two years. During the two years a study will be conducted by staff of Garden and Lewis Park. She stated her belief that this was the right thing to do. Member Masica commented that putting $40,000 into a two year experiment was not a good use of taxpayer's dollars. Member Housh said the $40,000 was only being moved from one location to another. The only adjustment would be the two year time the boards were up at Todd Park, if approved. Mr. Cockriel said there would not be a total waste of $40,000 and most things could be used at another location. What would be wasted was manpower. He added lighting glare on portable rinks was not totally kind to the neighborhood. Higher light standards on a permanent rink create fewer glares for neighbors. Page 14 Minutes/Edina City Council/August 16, 2005 Member Masica asked why Lewis Park was not a good location. Linda Presthus, Park Board Member, 7104 Lanham Lane, said Lewis Park-,has a hockey rink. One consideration was the neighborhood concept for a neighborhood rink. 'Lewis Park was considered as an expansion site with artificial ice and a Zamboni. She clarified that more ice was requested by the Hockey Association. Initially it sounded good until it was realized that a Zamboni had never been tested on outside ice, there was no place to house the Zamboni and that this would not be a one year solution. They then thought of Braemar Park with a short sheet of ice and testing the Zamboni on outside ice. Braemar Park was just an idea. Ms. Presthus said since there were no advantages of being at Lewis Park for this year, the Park Board recommended Todd Park. The neighborhood had the concept, there were fewer rinks in the area, and Todd Park has a warming house. Ms. Presthus said Lewis Park was highly used by a lot of people in the afternoon. The hockey rink was flooded in the AM and was used heavily in the afternoon. When the kids arrive to play in the evening, the rink was chewed up and another reason why ' Lewis Park was not recommended by the Park Board. Mr. Klus stated the Park Board looked at staff options / recommendations for the 2005 -2006 hockey season for an eleventh sheet of ice. He added that there would as much discussion by the neighborhoods to add a second rink in any location. Mr. Meehan voiced confusion with the proceedings. He said two petitions were delivered, one to the Park Board with 101 signatures stating the community did not want the Todd Park rink, and one to the Council with 306 signatures stating they also did not want the rink. He questioned why community input was sought. Member Swenson asked the Mayor to call the question. Member Swenson made a motion to close the public hearing, seconded by Member Housh. Mark Brimacombe, 4413 Rutledge Avenue, interrupted the motion to state that the neighborhood does not want the Todd Park hockey rink. Member Housh said the best interest of the broader community must be served. Mr. Brimacombe asked why the rink could not be rebuilt at Countryside. Member Masica asked the Mayor to call the question due to the lateness of the hour. Ayes: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Masica said the decision of the Council will be in the best interest of the most number of people. Todd Park may be a short - sighted fix but she believes Lewis Park would be the best site. Member Swenson made a motion approving construction of a permanent outdoor hockey rink at Todd Park for a period of two years and to direct staff to study Garden Park, Lewis Park and other alternate sites for presentation to the Council by July 1, 2007. Member Housh seconded the motion. Member Masica inquired what could be determined at Todd Park in a two year time span. Mr. Keprios said staff at the warming houses takes attendance of scheduled, general skating and hockey use. Member Housh asked if a coordinated effort could be undertaken to ascertain whether Todd Park was the best location. Member Swenson said there were two parts to this, 1) how much Page 15 Minutes/Edina City Council/August 16, 2005 this rink will be used and 2) how satisfactory it was and that was the challenge of the Park and Recreation Department. She said she has received numerous calls that live near the rink that were in favor of Todd Park. Mayor Hovland said he was not persuaded the Hockey Association requires eleven hockey rinks but would support the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT POLICY APPROVED Assistant Manager Anderson indicated that Staff and the Council have had four work sessions since the beginning of 2005 to review the residential road reconstruction program and how the City assesses the costs. Staff was recommending an increase in road reconstruction projects over a period of the next few years. Projects reviewed for feasibility in 2005 have resulted in substantially higher costs than prior assessment years. There has been greater resistance from neighborhoods to have curb and gutter installed where it does not exist today. The increased costs and resistance to pay has resulted in the engaging of a consultant to review the proposed project areas and determine if costs of the projects generate the equivalent market value benefit to homeowners. If costs were higher than benefits, the City would be at risk for legal challenges to the assessments. Results of the study indicated the proposed assessable costs do match with the market value benefit to the homes. Mr. Anderson stated staff conducted an extensive survey of other community's road reconstruction programs and how the cities assess /pay for those costs. Results of the survey showed a combination of tax supported expenditures with varying assessment practices in those communities. The new special assessment policy as proposed takes the information gathered and proposes a number of changes to the current assessment policies that the City uses today. Mr. Anderson gave a presentation depicting reasons for a need to change the current policy, and a brief overview of the appraisal report and City assessment survey, and the proposed changes to current assessment policy. Mr. Anderson elaborated that elements of the proposal include: • The assessable unit for�non -State Aid residential street projects would be the residential equivalent unit (REU) of a lot, rather than the front footage of the property. • If a corner lot was subject to multiple street reconstruction assessments over a period of years, the total assessable cost should be the equivalent of one REU. • Assessments must be equitable to all homes that were being assessed. • The term of residential roadway assessments will continue to be ten (10) years. • The interest rate of the assessment should be pegged to assessment bonds that have been issued in the past 12 months or the 10 year Aaa bond rate plus 2 percent. • The City will accept both partial pre - payments and full pre - payments on assessments before certifying the assessment to the tax rolls. For ease of administration, a minimum of 25 percent of the assessable cost must be applied for a partial payment. He noted that elements of the Senior Deferral Program will change for equity and fairness. The Council will consider offering an amortized payment schedule instead of a level principal payment schedule. Additionally, the new policy will not be retroactive to projects that have already been assessed. Under the new policy, curb and gutter on non -State Aid residential streets will be financed by the City's Storm Water Utility Fund instead of adjacent property owners. Staff feels strongly that curb Page 16 Minutes/Edina City Council/August 16, 2005 and gutter should be installed in areas of the community where it does not exist today and maintained and replaced as necessary in other parts of town. For the 2004 -2005 assessment projects, the proposal will require an increase in storm water rates of approximately $2.00 per household per quarter. Street reconstruction costs, less curb and gutter costs would continue to be assessed to adjacent property owners at 100 percent of the cost. Resident comments: Jill Larson, 5325 Oaklawn Avenue in the South Harriet Park area, said when their street was reconstructed, they were opposed to curb and gutter. She voiced concern that the policy was unfair that they will be paying for installation of curb and gutter in other City locations through increased utility fees. Residents with impending street reconstruction projects will even pay less for their new streets. Ms. Larson questioned why just a portion of the street reconstruction project was singled out and paid for through utility fees. She suggested the Council adopt a shared cost policy, and a fair way would be for the whole project, not just curbs and gutters. Her neighbors might have approved installation of curb and gutters if the cost would have been spread through all of Edina. Ms. Larson said utility fees were user fees and streets were not utilities. She questioned, 1) how a higher user fee can be charged when she would not benefit, 2) if the street utility fee as proposed in the current legislature and promoted by many cities as a way to pay for street reconstruction and specifically to pay for curbs and gutters did not pass, and 3) how can Edina adopt this policy. Ms. Larson asked why a public hearing was not held. Council comments on the proposed policy in response to Ms. Larson s questions were as follows: 1) curb and gutters were a conveyance system for stormwater and rates were set up to handle the surface water and were a part of the roadway costs, 2) the policy will take the financial piece away from the assessment and help the City fulfill the general engineering suggestion that curb and gutters should be included in street reconstruction, 3) costs were spread throughout the taxpayer base with the City paying for power costs for street lights, 4) parks were for everyone and some people use them and some do not, and 5) road repairs due to sewer backups were spread throughout the taxpayer base on Tower and St. John a few years ago. Geoff Workinger, 5224 Kellogg Avenue, inquired whether future road reconstruction projects will have the option of having curbs and gutters or not. Mr. Hughes said the policy will remain unchanged, each project will stand alone. Mr. Workinger said he would be surprised if any neighborhoods would opt out of having curb and gutters for a fee of $2.00 a quarter on their utility bill. Mayor Hovland said the policy was proposed so that there would not be the broad impact if property taxes would go up. Mr. Workinger asked what the difference would be between the utility fee and a property tax fee. Mr. Anderson said it was not only the cost differential, it was the way the tax handles property versus a utility fee. Mr. Hughes said the utility fee was a more stable fee source on an ongoing basis that the City has more control of than property taxes that the City has less control of. Rick Ferguson, 5351 Kellogg Avenue, indicated when his road was being reconstructed he wanted curb and gutter, his neighbors did not but cost was the main tie breaker. The main issue was fairness to his neighborhood. Member Housh asked if a bid alternate could be considered for the project. Mr. Houle stated the feasibility study surveys showed 81% of residents responded, 57 % no, 43% yes. Ned Blankenship, 5240 Oaklawn, inquired how long the bituminous lip that has.been installed in their South Harriet Park neighborhood will last. Mr. Houle said the lip might last one or two seasons at the most. Page 17 Minutes/Edina City Council/August 16, 2005 Quinn Scott, 5307 Kellogg Avenue, said he opposed installation of curb and gutter in the neighborhood, but what will ' happen with hoWe values in two years when their street has deteriorated. Mr. Houle said'this initially was a contentious issue and aesthetics was the issue that defeated the proposal for curb and gutter. Mr. Hughes said if the neighborhood wants curb and gutter at this juncture, the project would be stopped, a petition circulated requiring nearly a 100% majority of residents wanting curb and gutter, a public hearing scheduled and public meeting held, and with winter coming soon, residents could be driving on a gravel road until spring. Member Housh noted he had received a number of calls in favor of the policy as presented. Member Housh made a motion approving the Special Assessment Police as presented. Member Masica seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -69 APPROVED, ' NOMINATING ROBERT T. KOTETIN for RE- APPOINTMENT TO THE NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED BOARD Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh approving the nomination of Robert J. Kojetin for re- appointment to the Nine Mile Creek Watershed Board. Motion carried on rollcall vote- four ayes. *RENEWAL OF FACILITY REFUSE AND RECYCLING CONTRACT APPROVED Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh approving the extension of Waste Management's contract for refuse and recycling collection at City facilities through 2006. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW OF AUGUST 2,2005; APPROVED Member Swenson asked that the Traffic Safety Staff Review be removed from the Consent Agenda for further information. Member Swenson said due to the late hour and no one, appearing to speak, motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Housh approving the Traffic Safety Staff Review of August 2, 2005, Section A: 1. Installation of "No Parking" signs on the north side. of West 72nd Street from France Avenue to the west end of the parking lot drive -way of the commercial building; and Section B and C. Ayes: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Member 1 made a motion and Member 2 seconded the motion approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated August 2, 1005, and consisting of 26 pages: General Fund $90,125.96; Communications Fund $3,573.26; Working Capital Fund $2,677.35; Construction Fund $400.00; Art Center Fund $4,472.21; Golf Dome Fund $1,618.90; Aquatic Center Fund $5,661.17; Golf Course Fund $28,226.17; Ice Arena Fund $1,500.00; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $21,780.42; Liquor Fund $98,143.88; Utility Fund $34,473.79; Storm Sewer Fund $9,823.53; PSTF Fund $1,550.69, TOTAL $304,027.33; and for approval of payment of claims dated August 10, 2005, and consisting of 34 pages: General Fund $433,174.58; Communications Fund $2,413.65; Working Capital Fund $11,291.54; Art Center Fund $4,229.46; Aquatic Center Fund $3,727.60; Golf Course Fund $12,393.19; Ice Arena Fund $26,304.22; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $8,295.30; Page 18 Minutes/Edina City Council/August 16, 2005 Liquor Fund $243,896.09; Utility Fund $11,216.36; Storm Sewer Fund $1,994.08; Recycling Fund $3,432.98; PSTF Fund $764.56; TOTAL $763,133.61. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. I *PETITION RECEIVED REQUESTING CURB AND GUTTER ON SCHAEFER CIRCLE BETWEEN SCHAEFER ROAD AND END OF CUL -DE -SAC Member Masica made a motion, seconded by Member Housh accepting a petition from residents of Schaefer Circle between Schaefer Road and end of cul -de -sac for curb and gutter in conjunction with the Award of Bid for Schaefer Circle Roadway and Utility Improvements - Contract No. ENG. 05 -12. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. CONCERN OF RESIDENTS Clara Gooding, 5824 Halifax Avenue South, voiced concern that she understood when Halifax Avenue road improvement was planned; the road would remain the same. She said today' the street was much narrower and 'cars drive over their property. Ms. Gooding said she also has no parking space on the street now. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 1:37 A.M. City Clerk Page 19 Era W fNCORPOR%` . lees REPORURECOM M EN DATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item:. III. A. it From: Craig Larsen Consent City Planner Information Only Date: September 6, 20.05 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Action: ❑ Motion Final, Development Plan ❑ Resolution 5101 W. 70,n Street 0 Ordinance Gramercv Club of Edina ❑ Discussion Information /Background: (Public hearing is scheduled for September 20, 2005.) The Planning Commission voted to recommend approval at their August 31, 2005, meeting. 0 REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 31, 2005,7:00 PM EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 4801 WEST 50TH STREET Case Number: P -05 -5 Location: Southwesterly quadrant of 70th Street and Metro Boulevard. Applicant: Gramercy Club of Edina Tim Nichols Property owner: Gramercy Club of Edina 12750 Nicollet Ave. So. Burnsville, MN Comprehensive Plan: High Density Residential Zoning: PRD-4, Planned Residence District Request: Final Development Plan approval to allow the construction of a 4 -story, 128 unit residential building. Replatting of the property from two lots to one lot. Background: The Commission will recall that several proposals to redevelop this site were considered in 2004. The City approved a 117 unit building that was later reduced to 106 units as the individual units got larger. It was the owner's intent at the time to have two buildings, under separate ownership; one would be a rental and other a condominium. Following all City approvals the condo site was sold to a third party. The new owner did not intend to develop the site as approved. Following several months of negotiations the entire site came under single ownership. Proiect description: The new plans illustrate a 4 story 128 unit coop. The units would range from 970 to 2,000 square feet. The plans call for 190 parking spaces under building and 36 surface spaces. Zoning compliance Density: Although the unit count has increased from the previously approved plans, it continues to comply with the lot area per unit requirement in the PRD-4 district. Setbacks: The minimum building setback is 35 feet of the height of the building. The building measures 42.5 feet in height: The plan requires a setback variance for the northeast and southeast ends of the building. The previous plan required similar setback variances. Parking: The 190 spaces provided in the garage exceed our requirement of 1.25 spaces per unit. However, the 36 surface spaces do not meet the requirement of 0.75 spaces per unit. Landscaping: The proposed plan complies in terms of the amount of material, but some of the overstory deciduous and evergreen trees will need to be increased in size to meet our requirements. Exterior materials: The proposed materials of brick and cement fiber board meet our ordinances requirements for exterior materials. Engineering issues: See attached memo from the City Engineer. Recommendation: Staff believes it is extremely important to the quality of the overall development that the entire site is now under a single owner. Staff recommends approval of the proposed Final Development Plan, including the requested variances. We also recommend Final Plat approval as recommended. Conditions to approval are: 1. Agreement to grant easement for intersection improvements 2. Watershed District permits. 3. Staff approval of revised landscape plan and schedule. BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS 10417 EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD, SUITE TWO %'HOPKINS, MN 55343 / (952) 238 -1667 / FAX (952) 238 -1671 August 15, 2005 MEMORANDUM TO: Michael Supina, Miller Hanson Partners FROM: James A. Benshof and Aravind Gottemukk� Refer to File: 05 -66 RE: Trip Generation Review for Proposed Residential Development at 70`h Street and Metro Boulevard in Edina PURPOSE The purpose of this memorandum is to present the results of our trip generation review for the proposed senior cooperative housing development at 70`h Street and Metro Boulevard in Edina. The review involved developing a.m. and p.m. peak hour trip generation estimates for the following three development scenarios: Proposed development Plan previously approved by the City Hypothetical office scenario TRIP GENERATION REVIEW 128 senior cooperative housing units 117 market rate apartments 96,900 SF (assuming a floor area ratio of 0.5 for the total site area of 4.45 acres) Trip generation estimates were developed for the proposed development using data collected at another similar development in the Twin Cities metropolitan area. Trip generation projections for the other two development scenarios were calculated using data presented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Trip Generation, Seventh Edition. Table 1 shows the trip generation projections for the three scenarios. Table 1 Trip Generation Estimates for Peak Hours of Adjacent Street Traffic Development Scenario Size Units A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour In Out I Total In I Out Total Proposed development - senior housing 128 DU 10 12 22 18 11 29 Previous Plan - apartments 117 DU 12 48 60 47 25 72 Hypothetical Office 96,900 SF 161 22 183 25 120 145 DU— dwelling units, SF— square feet From information presented in Table 1, the proposed development will generate significantly fewer trips than either alternative development scenario. Specifically, the proposed development will generate about 63 percent and 88 percent fewer trips during the a.m. peak hour, compared to the apartment and the office scenarios, respectively. In the p.m. peak hour, the proposed development will generate about 60 percent and 80 percent fewer trips compared to the apartment and the office scenarios, respectively. A. e MEMORANDUM — Plan Review ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA DATE: August 23, 2005 TO: Craig Larsen FROM: Wayne Houle SUBJECT: Proposed Gramercy Edina 7100 & 7180 Metro Boulevard Engineering has reviewed the above stated project and offer the following comments: The West 70th Street and Metro Boulevard intersection is scheduled for 2006 / 2007. There is a potential for additional right -of -way along the northeasterly corner of the property in order to accommodate a north to west left turn bay. The preliminary design is anticipated to be complete by December; therefore staff is recommending that the Developer agree to a reasonable right -of -way taking if needed at this location. Sheet C2 — Site Plan: 1. Remove 4 -foot bituminous trail along West 70th Street, unless Developer provides a sidewalk along both West 70th Street and Metro Boulevard. 2. Curb cut permits required at both driveway locations. Sheet C3 — Grading Plan: 1. The profile / grade of the southerly entrance into the underground garage should include a level landing area of at least 20 -30 feet. The current grades show a grade of greater than 5 %. Sheet C4 — Erosion Control: 1. Provide detail inlet protection for all catch basins along both West 70th Street and Metro Boulevard. 2. Provide flotation silt fence at both storm sewer outlets. May require flotation fence downstream in Ninemile Creek — verify with watershed district. This project will also require a Ninemile Creek Watershed permit. 3. Relocate main construction entrance to Metro Boulevard — NO CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES ALLOWED ON WEST 70TH STREET WEST OF METRO. Sheet C5 — Utility Plan: 1. All concrete curb and gutters along both West 70th Street and Metro Boulevard shall be 86 -18; provide detail of this curb. 2. Any concrete curb and gutter that is adjacent to a sidewalk needs to be a modified 66 -18 or 136 -12 depending upon location, see attached detail. 3. Relocate sanitary sewer service to connect to existing sanitary sewer manhole in southeasterly corner of property. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this first review. Thanks I A E � t '1 �A •3o -- --j I � � I _I 1 i L• I � i L 70TH STREET WEST LOT 1 `\ BLOW F 1 �t \`�• •. ��JJJ \ �\ \ \ \ \s \ T+a \ IN I — — — — — 70 1 O � F I ;> 0 m 9.Ie.5.7e L -19.09 a =5.57'20' F-- CRAMEECYEOeivv.4 �°1 °6 Y City of, Edl na Hennepin County, Minnesota ° LEGAL DESCRIPTION : ¢ Lots 1 & 2, Block 1, WALLINGFORD ADDITION LOCATION MAP r ---1 SITE— No Seale INDEX : C>) COVERSREET/PRELIAIINART PLAT C2) SITE PLAN C3) GRADING PLAN C4) EROSION CONTROL PLAN C6) UTILITY PLAN C6) EXISTING CONDITIONS C7) LANDSCAPE PLAN Hn CS .`l t2! E `Eio �N. G i E c c Ftg;o a In O 2 �2 V� o mo Im 0 O V I o_ 2no °cv 0 4 V4 Q o 2 Wo Y A Ot o�° w o >> NE`o V V A`1 1771RELI MI NARY, 0 � 8 fyraT FOR CONSl F UG'T!ON C1 50 0 50 100 150 Scale 1 = 50' 08/17/05 Lzg r' RON —I:Il. • �I Y INDEX : C>) COVERSREET/PRELIAIINART PLAT C2) SITE PLAN C3) GRADING PLAN C4) EROSION CONTROL PLAN C6) UTILITY PLAN C6) EXISTING CONDITIONS C7) LANDSCAPE PLAN Hn CS .`l t2! E `Eio �N. G i E c c Ftg;o a In O 2 �2 V� o mo Im 0 O V I o_ 2no °cv 0 4 V4 Q o 2 Wo Y A Ot o�° w o >> NE`o V V A`1 1771RELI MI NARY, 0 � 8 fyraT FOR CONSl F UG'T!ON C1 50 0 50 100 150 Scale 1 = 50' 08/17/05 1 E \ \ Crossing \ I n Troll I I _ I i � - :1 i \ II I u II am _ NI —OE of - - - -� --------- - - -, I 1 I I I ncrete' -- so ; Apron i i-- STREET WEST - -70TH co vi 4 Foot Bituminous I I \ \ Crossing \ I n Troll I � - :1 \ II I u II am _ NI s I 1 I I I ncrete' so ; Apron i i-- am I I I 5 Foot Concrete Sldewalk(TYP.) —, 1� � i v + _ ' I I Pedestrian Crossing ' B –B i \ I 0T 1 BL 1 .. L \\ -NOT E QO Taper Curb to ramp. a 20.0 B_B a \ ? k\ R5.0. \\ \ \ Crossing \ II IE�� II I rConcrele /` Apron I � � II C4 'I I �. PP I 1 GR 4MERCV ED /N.4 0510 City of Edina Hennepin County, Minnesota SITE DATA Total Site Area 193,726 Sq.ft. - 4.45 Acres SETBACK REQUIREMENTS: BUILDING SETBACKS: Public ROW 35 Feet Adjacent Properly Line - 50 Feet PARKING LOT SETBACKS: Public ROW 20 Feet � m fly m �pak �B Z •P = €� z sad SSG° \ ci c° r ag °a F L2• s &i& 4 C1 0 a °m zz mom s vmi OHO °a W 4 °wa qo 0 rQ V �% V OWN wa WZ =" O w o osa R ear — No r FO!,, C ONSTROO'HON C2 50 0 50 100 150 Mij Scale 1" = 50' 06 /17 /os OE -35.0 - II I u II s I 1 I ncrete' ; Apron i i-- am Nm' B –B €z. PP I \ II IE�� II I rConcrele /` Apron I � � II C4 'I I �. PP I 1 GR 4MERCV ED /N.4 0510 City of Edina Hennepin County, Minnesota SITE DATA Total Site Area 193,726 Sq.ft. - 4.45 Acres SETBACK REQUIREMENTS: BUILDING SETBACKS: Public ROW 35 Feet Adjacent Properly Line - 50 Feet PARKING LOT SETBACKS: Public ROW 20 Feet � m fly m �pak �B Z •P = €� z sad SSG° \ ci c° r ag °a F L2• s &i& 4 C1 0 a °m zz mom s vmi OHO °a W 4 °wa qo 0 rQ V �% V OWN wa WZ =" O w o osa R ear — No r FO!,, C ONSTROO'HON C2 50 0 50 100 150 Mij Scale 1" = 50' 06 /17 /os _T P A T 13 843.5 843.0 I V OE 7T- MMIER GRAMERCY I # # II II II II Jill � -II III i . I II 842-1 II City of Edina 1841.0 ls. ,l I\ I Hennepin County, Minnesota I I i , l I a - I �I = ,;. -.,,! - ( r / � BENCHMARK 7NH=842.77 L A JI 837.1 1336.5 836.3 1.) UNDERLYING TOPOGRAPHY FROM INFORMATION FIELD VERIFIED BY HEDLUND ENGINEERING. 2.) EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS AS—PER 841.0 34 II PLANS PROVIDED BY CITY OF EDINA AND FIELD VERIFIED BY HEDLUND ENGINEERING. �j L 'J 3.) INSTALI, MAINTAIN AND REPAIR SILT FENCING. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AND SEDIMENT FILTER UN' CONSTRUCTION IS CO.PLETED. AND NEW VEGETATION AND SUNU, nSLESTA,,S,ED(REFER TO EROSION CONTROL NOTES). V, _T P A T 13 843.5 843.0 I V OE 7T- MMIER GRAMERCY I # # II II II II Jill � -II III i . I II 842-1 II City of Edina 1841.0 Hennepin County, Minnesota % BENCHMARK 7NH=842.77 L A JI 837.1 1336.5 836.3 1.) UNDERLYING TOPOGRAPHY FROM INFORMATION FIELD VERIFIED BY HEDLUND ENGINEERING. 2.) EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS AS—PER L I J 34 II PLANS PROVIDED BY CITY OF EDINA AND FIELD VERIFIED BY HEDLUND ENGINEERING. 3.) INSTALI, MAINTAIN AND REPAIR SILT FENCING. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AND SEDIMENT FILTER UN' CONSTRUCTION IS CO.PLETED. AND NEW VEGETATION AND SUNU, nSLESTA,,S,ED(REFER TO EROSION CONTROL NOTES). 3. _T P A T 13 843.5 843.0 I LEGEND: X - 920.8 ST-ST -X-X- BENCHMARK EXISTING CONTOUR EXISTING GRADE ELEVATION EXISTING TREE LINE EXISTING TREE EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING FENCE PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED GRADE AT TOP OF CURB UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE RETAINING WALL DENOTES AS-BUILT GRADE APPROXIMATELY 315 FEET SOUTH OF 70TH STREET WEST AND EAST OF METRO BLVD. ELEV.= 842.77 TOTAL DISTRUBED AREA = 4.5 ACRES TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE = 2.0 ACRES 10 . e� Qgd 2. 4 s Q �LN�m o in qo o m t�w 0 EVA J RELIMINARY rmz C 3 30 0 30 60 90 Scale 1" = 30' 011/=17/05 V OE 7T- MMIER GRAMERCY I # # II II II II Jill � -II III i . I II 842-1 II City of Edina 1841.0 Hennepin County, Minnesota BENCHMARK 7NH=842.77 L A JI 837.1 1336.5 836.3 1.) UNDERLYING TOPOGRAPHY FROM INFORMATION FIELD VERIFIED BY HEDLUND ENGINEERING. 2.) EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS AS—PER L I J 34 II LEGEND: X - 920.8 ST-ST -X-X- BENCHMARK EXISTING CONTOUR EXISTING GRADE ELEVATION EXISTING TREE LINE EXISTING TREE EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING FENCE PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED GRADE AT TOP OF CURB UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE RETAINING WALL DENOTES AS-BUILT GRADE APPROXIMATELY 315 FEET SOUTH OF 70TH STREET WEST AND EAST OF METRO BLVD. ELEV.= 842.77 TOTAL DISTRUBED AREA = 4.5 ACRES TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE = 2.0 ACRES 10 . e� Qgd 2. 4 s Q �LN�m o in qo o m t�w 0 EVA J RELIMINARY rmz C 3 30 0 30 60 90 Scale 1" = 30' 011/=17/05 PRO.ECT MMIER GRAMERCY I 051046 City of Edina Hennepin County, Minnesota GENERAL GRADING NOTES: 1.) UNDERLYING TOPOGRAPHY FROM INFORMATION FIELD VERIFIED BY HEDLUND ENGINEERING. 2.) EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS AS—PER PLANS PROVIDED BY CITY OF EDINA AND FIELD VERIFIED BY HEDLUND ENGINEERING. 3.) INSTALI, MAINTAIN AND REPAIR SILT FENCING. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AND SEDIMENT FILTER UN' CONSTRUCTION IS CO.PLETED. AND NEW VEGETATION AND SUNU, nSLESTA,,S,ED(REFER TO EROSION CONTROL NOTES). LEGEND: X - 920.8 ST-ST -X-X- BENCHMARK EXISTING CONTOUR EXISTING GRADE ELEVATION EXISTING TREE LINE EXISTING TREE EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING FENCE PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED GRADE AT TOP OF CURB UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE RETAINING WALL DENOTES AS-BUILT GRADE APPROXIMATELY 315 FEET SOUTH OF 70TH STREET WEST AND EAST OF METRO BLVD. ELEV.= 842.77 TOTAL DISTRUBED AREA = 4.5 ACRES TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE = 2.0 ACRES 10 . e� Qgd 2. 4 s Q �LN�m o in qo o m t�w 0 EVA J RELIMINARY rmz C 3 30 0 30 60 90 Scale 1" = 30' 011/=17/05 5 51 � l _f - - -- —4 -- 5T /VIII , ST�y,_:a— --ice I W j• I:. j I ; 90O n.ance nw�y QCap.- j H c 6 ' MIWMUM o14 ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE - He ems. STREET t WEST /S~ FENCE ROCK CONSTRUCr1off I - - - - -- NTRA_NCE n ` ,`, __ I'll ll (•t — I \ 7r I /.lam �- '� {•. \ .. Snow Fence Filter Fabric Minimum Distance Between Posts Ie 2 Feet. An Extra Past May Be Added On Each Side. A 11 • 1 11 \ I II I 1 II 1- I I I 1 it I 1 I -- II W �I 1 11 � I � t � 3 i1 _ 1 I I II E_1 I I \ 1 Slit Fence Inlet Sediment Filter Wood or Metal Stake. Steal w Wood PM s tw'anna Fmaa„tenetl to Poll Support Boards Lay Fabric In Trench 30' Mt, Height Unalaturbad • soo • Minimum 12' 2 ' MM. Depth_ 0" Non F m eUnnah a l W aTr Tha Mot an d poet the -� Still TYPE A SEDIMENT FILTER No Scale SILT FENCE TYPICAL No Scala i GRAMERCY EDINA4 City of Edina Hennepin County, Minnesota GENERAL EROSION CONTROL NOTES: EROSION CONTROL SCHEDULE: 1.) INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES PRIOR TO ANY LAND DISTURBANCE INSTALL SEDIMENT FILTERS IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING INSTALLATION OF STRUCTURE. 2.) WITHIN 7 DAYS OF GRADING OF SLOPES 3:1 OR GREATER, SLOPES MUST BE STABILIZED BY BEING SEEDED AND COVERED WITH AN EROSION CONTROL BLANKET OR MULCHED WITH A TACKIFYING AGENT. 3.) ALL EROSION CONTROL INSTALLATIONS SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE AND BE MAINTAINED IN GOOD CONDITION BY THE CONTRACTOR/PERMITTEE UNTIL THE SITE HAS BEEN RE- VEGETATED, AT WHICH TIME THEY SHALL BE REMOVED. FOR PROPOSED PAVED SURFACE AREA, THE CONTRACTOR MAY REMOVE NECESSARY SILT FENCING TO CONSTRUCT ROADWAY WHILE MAINTAINING ADEQUATE EROSION CONTROL IN ADJACENT AREAS. 4.) SUFFICIENT TOPSOIL SHALL BE STOCKPILED TO ALLOW FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF A MINIMUM F 4' OF TOPSOIL FOR DISTURBED AREAS THAT ARE TO BE REVEGATATED. 5.) THE CONTRACTOR /PEMITTEE SHALL SCHEDULE SITE GRADING, UTILITY INSTALLATION AND ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION SO THAT THE GENERAL SITE CAN BE MULCHED AND RE- SEEDED SOON AFTER DISTURBANCE ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED WITHIN 14 DAYS AFTER COMPLETION OF FINAL GRADING OR AFTER 14 DAYS OF GRADING INACTIVITY. ALL MULCH MATERIAL SHALL BE DISCED INTO THE SOIL IN DIRECTION PERPENDICULAR TO THE STORMWATER FLOW OVER SUCH AREAS. 6.) REVEGETATE WITH MNDOT MIX 50B OR 608 AT 75 LBS /ACRE WTH TYPE 1 MULCH AT 2000 LBS /ACRE EROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE PROGRAM: 1.) INSPECT CONSTRUCTION SITE ONCE EVERY 7 DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF A RAINFALL EVENT OF MORE THAN /INCHES IN 24 HOUR PERIOD. 2.) SEDIMENT DEPOSITS SHOULD BE REMOVED AFTER EACH STORM EVENT. THEY MUST BE REMOVED WHEN DEPOSITS REACH APPROXIMATELY ONE -HALF THE HEIGHT OF THE BARRIER. 3.) SILT FENCE FABRIC SHALL BE REPLACED PROMPTLY WHEN IT DECOMPOSES OR BECOMES INEFFECTIVE BEFORE THE BARRIER IS NO LONGER NECESSARY. 4.) ALL SOILS TRACKED ONTO PAVEMENT SHALL BE REMOVED DAILY. 5.) ANY SEDIMENT REMAINING IN PLACE AFTER THE SILT FENCE OR FILTER FABRIC IS NO LONGER REQUIRED SHALL BE DRESSED TO CONFORM WITH THE EXISTING GRADE. PREPARED AND SEEDED WITH THE APPROPRIATE SEED MIX. 6.) IN THOSE AREAS WHERE WOOD FIBER BLANKET OR OTHER SLOPE STABILIZATION METHOD HAS FAILED, THE SLOPE SHALL BE REESTABLISHED, SEED AND TOPSOIL REPLACED, AND ADDITIONAL SLOPE TREATMENT INSTALLED. 7.) SILT FENCES SHALL REMOVED WHEN THEY HAVE SERVED THEIR USEFUL PURPOSE BUT NOT BEFORE THE UPWARD SLOPE AREA HAS BEEN PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. REMOVAL IS REQUIRED WITH ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES (SEDIMENT FILTERS, HAY BALES, ETC.) ONCE SITE IS PERMANENTLY STABIUZED BY THE BUILDER. 8.) ALL PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASINS MUST BE RESTORED TO THEIR DESIGN CONDITION IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING PERMANENT STABILIZATION OF THE SITE LEGEND: 051046 O m Ypp�6 �.I z d eESg v o o aD 4i4S ZEN; 9 =i5£ �2 IS' �2 V�2 o Qru �a�Grmo y� ^O 2a mr 2m PrdR 0 tlNwa4 A° ° wo eo �N O w O � C !rh•�� m V V a m a u z. z� �ai nEo � w LS�ma � g onAw+ aeoaa omw 1101 FOR CON -! ! C 4 50 0 50 100 150 mil �71 o.a Scale 1" = 50' 08 /17/05 EXISTING CONTOUR .,••` "�,- •'_,• -, ••,,,. EXISTING TREE LINE i EXISTING TREE — ST —ST— EXISTING STORM SEWER —x —x— EXISTING FENCE • RETAINING WALL PROPOSED CONTOUR — PROPOSED STORM SEWER e9RYN►9rssar►ees EROSION CONTROL BARRIER T` { ?�ll, t.v2 ;+y ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 3. .h.t �„a f 051046 O m Ypp�6 �.I z d eESg v o o aD 4i4S ZEN; 9 =i5£ �2 IS' �2 V�2 o Qru �a�Grmo y� ^O 2a mr 2m PrdR 0 tlNwa4 A° ° wo eo �N O w O � C !rh•�� m V V a m a u z. z� �ai nEo � w LS�ma � g onAw+ aeoaa omw 1101 FOR CON -! ! C 4 50 0 50 100 150 mil �71 o.a Scale 1" = 50' 08 /17/05 T N 1 ... i ' / /� / SS SS S1-- D*IP 9 at .95� _OE -- - - ------- G-838.4 - - Ile SS - - ST Ex. MH - - OTH STREET WEST 7-8,38.5 - - - - - - CB - - CP - Ex. FIE FES- 1011" I- 825.4\ 827.0 FES 82.5 4p 56 FES- G-828.5 ,T§ ipsr 823. 1=824.5 E. MH IT- -821.01 I \ \ \E. M 8 20.9 1-832 G-835.5- 4z -1 n AINTAIN 8.0 CO MAINTAIN a NJ 11 wa T-843.0 N G-837.0 Hennepin County Minnesota 1=830.5 1-834.0 I CONe II L NO DOMESTIC AND FIRE SPLIT INSIDE G-835.5 R ate 1-831.5 Ex. Hyd. APR q11 4 LEGEND: BUILDING G-834. 1.5 I \ \ \E. M 8 20.9 1-832 G-835.5- City of Edina wa I u �i_ G-837.0 Hennepin County Minnesota 1-834.0 I CONe II L N 1 APR q11 4 LEGEND: E g 1.5 -SS-SS- E)USTING SANITARY SEWER os. 1= 838.5' RRELIMINARY! "CB _WM-WM- EXISTING WATERMAIN H011 1-:012 (()NFl RIJICTI01,1 C5 50 0 50 100 ISO PROPOSED BUILDING , 08/17/05 Scale 1" = 50' FFE!7B44.5 -x-x- EASTING FENCE 41 PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER GAR FL=834.5 VERIFY VICE ICE LOCATIONS AND SIZE W E ANICAL G-842-1 E --- I V .5 G-842.0 1=839.0 I I I P E_' PVC Sanitary 6 Ex.CB V CON G =837.2 L CR-TE APRON G--834.3 I - - - - - - - - - - - 1=832-8 G-814.8 1-830.§ MH DI 25.5 -b2O.44 I G-828.5 FES- 1-824.5 827.0 FES--- 823.6 GRA MERCY ED /NA 3/116* NOMAL _11- 12*- "ULAR SPACE r-- TYPE 'A' LID 10 TRENCH DRAIN DETAIL NO SCALE NOTE: PRECAST 'ECDNODRAIN' OR 'POLYCAST' SYSTEMS ARE ALSO ACCEPTABLE 6. Distance to Centerline Variable 1/2-R XR - 1/2-R - 3/4 P. 8" 1 b12 3 /4- 1/2-R P.T-F 3 (D 20' CONCRETE CURB DETAIL MnDOT B6-12 NOTE., ()Place # 4 Bar As Shown Where Curb Crosses Utility Trenches, With 1-1/2• Co-r. F-1.5' BIT. WEAR COURSE 1.5" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE 6' CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE SUBGRADE PAVEMENT SECTION No Scale GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1.) E,1,11,9 Utility I-, AO-Per A1B PP,.= B , . City of and Hodurd En , In, 2.) All El. l .thgg'Utilitim or Improvement., Including WaIM,Curb. Pavement and Pork-ye Damaged or Field 4.) Far on Sit. Location of Oil Under- rrC1.11tilitles Call Gopher State . I' sy-t-nn (651)454 -0002 5.) The Contractor Shall Beware of Potential Conflict. Wth EZbpf Utilities as Indicated an The Contractor Shall Excavate Around Utilities to Determine F J., Before Beginning ti- 6.) The Contractor 2h.II Be 1.p-lb! To Lower Waterrnoln During Install. Where Necessary To Awld_S-Ace Conflict.. DO o .2 ;,5 ti tE7 i--ul roo P % A 1 l em If --0 0 City of Edina wa Hennepin County Minnesota N 1 z .0. LEGEND: E g -SS-SS- E)USTING SANITARY SEWER os. oases RRELIMINARY! _WM-WM- EXISTING WATERMAIN H011 1-:012 (()NFl RIJICTI01,1 C5 50 0 50 100 ISO _ST- EASTING STORM SEWER 08/17/05 Scale 1" = 50' -x-x- EASTING FENCE 41 PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER -I- PROPOSED WATERMAJN PROPOSED STORM SEWER 3/116* NOMAL _11- 12*- "ULAR SPACE r-- TYPE 'A' LID 10 TRENCH DRAIN DETAIL NO SCALE NOTE: PRECAST 'ECDNODRAIN' OR 'POLYCAST' SYSTEMS ARE ALSO ACCEPTABLE 6. Distance to Centerline Variable 1/2-R XR - 1/2-R - 3/4 P. 8" 1 b12 3 /4- 1/2-R P.T-F 3 (D 20' CONCRETE CURB DETAIL MnDOT B6-12 NOTE., ()Place # 4 Bar As Shown Where Curb Crosses Utility Trenches, With 1-1/2• Co-r. F-1.5' BIT. WEAR COURSE 1.5" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE 6' CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE SUBGRADE PAVEMENT SECTION No Scale GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1.) E,1,11,9 Utility I-, AO-Per A1B PP,.= B , . City of and Hodurd En , In, 2.) All El. l .thgg'Utilitim or Improvement., Including WaIM,Curb. Pavement and Pork-ye Damaged or Field 4.) Far on Sit. Location of Oil Under- rrC1.11tilitles Call Gopher State . I' sy-t-nn (651)454 -0002 5.) The Contractor Shall Beware of Potential Conflict. Wth EZbpf Utilities as Indicated an The Contractor Shall Excavate Around Utilities to Determine F J., Before Beginning ti- 6.) The Contractor 2h.II Be 1.p-lb! To Lower Waterrnoln During Install. Where Necessary To Awld_S-Ace Conflict.. DO o .2 ;,5 ti tE7 i--ul roo P % A 1 l em If --0 0 wa c, N 1 z .0. E g FS os. oases RRELIMINARY! H011 1-:012 (()NFl RIJICTI01,1 C5 50 0 50 100 ISO 08/17/05 Scale 1" = 50' SS 1 11 0e 5-5 � � 1 SS -oE yss OE - -cSS _ St/ ST�� —°L� \, 1 L. m All I� w I N SS\ �1 9 0 3 E 3� as8 70TH STREET ST i _ST / S ;� ,----- �� - - -- I" v I\ \ \ 1 1I I I 9'7814'E I D I►I 3&0 I, � A / 1 `\ � I I � I I p I 70 11 I 11, � I a I 1I � ■ 1 C /5. S = EXISTING CONTOUR YJ 1 if If . „r: - -, ^, "�.'••, = EXISTING TREE LINE .. - EXISTING TREE — SS —SS— = EXISTING SANITARY SEWER —YWMMM WM— - EXISTING WATERMAIN — ST —ST— = EXISTING STORM SEWER —x —x— - EXISTING FENCE m� e3v1 I'' ;%• ICI- �:I'j'.t EW.UDp P=1&9 = EXISTING CATCH BASIN �sCN I E� I� •',' Ili1 -+Le I, '�� t t I �,� - EXISTING GATE VALVE v = LIGHT POLE 11 - HYDRANT '11.''1,' - • = POWER POLE / �In i IL - ELEC. TRANS. — — — — = PLAT EASEMENT C-1` ` I1 (: UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE _— { ---�- -- = BUILDING SETBACK LINE —�--�— PARKING SETBACK LINE 0 = DENOTES MONUMENT SET • = DENOTES MONUMENT FOUND I\ \ \ 1 1I I I 9'7814'E I D I►I 3&0 I, � A / 1 `\ � I I � I I p I 70 11 I 11, � I a I 1I � ■ 1 C /5. S I� 1- II I � I F =- il II I I__ I !I 1_ 0 I — — — — — — — Ir TO CCR.4MERCY ED/NA City of Edina Hennepin County, Minnesota LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lots 1 & 2, Block 1, WALLINGFORD ADDITION LEGEND: - -- . -- = EXISTING CONTOUR X = 920.8 = EXISTING GRADE ELEVATION . „r: - -, ^, "�.'••, = EXISTING TREE LINE .. - EXISTING TREE — SS —SS— = EXISTING SANITARY SEWER —YWMMM WM— - EXISTING WATERMAIN — ST —ST— = EXISTING STORM SEWER —x —x— - EXISTING FENCE _ = EXISTING CONCRETE 0 = EXISTING CATCH BASIN • = EXISTING CATCH BASIN a = EXISTING FES - EXISTING GATE VALVE v = LIGHT POLE -0 - HYDRANT a = POWER POLE q / ® - ELEC. TRANS. — — — — = PLAT EASEMENT —Y--— = UNDERGROUND GAS I� 1- II I � I F =- il II I I__ I !I 1_ 0 I — — — — — — — Ir TO CCR.4MERCY ED/NA City of Edina Hennepin County, Minnesota LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lots 1 & 2, Block 1, WALLINGFORD ADDITION LEGEND: - -- . -- = EXISTING CONTOUR X = 920.8 = EXISTING GRADE ELEVATION . „r: - -, ^, "�.'••, = EXISTING TREE LINE .. - EXISTING TREE — SS —SS— = EXISTING SANITARY SEWER —YWMMM WM— - EXISTING WATERMAIN — ST —ST— = EXISTING STORM SEWER —x —x— - EXISTING FENCE _ = EXISTING CONCRETE 0 = EXISTING CATCH BASIN • = EXISTING CATCH BASIN a = EXISTING FES - EXISTING GATE VALVE v = LIGHT POLE -0 - HYDRANT a = POWER POLE • = TELPED. ® - ELEC. TRANS. — — — — = PLAT EASEMENT —Y--— = UNDERGROUND GAS UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE _— UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC ---�- -- = BUILDING SETBACK LINE —�--�— PARKING SETBACK LINE 0 = DENOTES MONUMENT SET • = DENOTES MONUMENT FOUND PE = PLAT EASEMENT Property Area = 193,726 S.F. = 4.4473 Acres P101" FOR 'C'ONSTRIK'TION j 50 0 50 100 150 Scale 1" = 50' 051046 fj �e 1 � Z - p- 2! gg eE` AEF $E�p 2 Y�^,g o in a - 2me waw 4 ° wo Q O N �1 f� ti V V V o m W Wa 4� r� CS W V�ma •atT IaIYBDi C6 D,R 08/17/05 _ - - -� S5 _ L SS�S1 _ -6E SS SS SS S1 / ST !-S y55�g- -ss 51/ l _3 Al, 11 ' 11 U 1 `l II II II II it -ere i M II III L ea .��I1I It I .I I a� �� �, �. � �;-1—==11 �e" ;d °.��r�. �a CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL City of Edina Hennepin County, Minnesota PLANT LIST: Site Plantings QTY. KEY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE/ROOT TREES 5 NWM Acer rubrum 'Northwood' Northwood Red Maple 2 -1/2" B&B 11 GMM Acer soccharum 'Green Mountain' Green ML Sugar Maple 2 -1/2" B &B 18 APA Fraxinue amerlcano 'Autumn Purple' Autumn Purple White Ash 2 -1/2' B &B 21 SWO Ouercus bicolor Swamp White Oak 2-1/2: 1 NPO Ouercus eilipsoldolis Northam Pin Oak - 2 -1/2' B &B 16 GL Mild cordate 'Greenspire' Greenspire Linden 2 -1/2" B&B 5 BHS Piceo glauca densata Black Hills Spruce 6' -0' B &B 13 WP Plnue etrobus Eastern White Pine 6' -0" B &B 14 WP Pinus sylvestris Scotch Pine 6' -0' B &B 17 AM Acer glnnalo Amur Maple, muitl -stem 1.5" B &B 3 CTH Cratoegus crus -gaili Inermis Thornless Cockspur Hawthorn 1.5" B&B 2 PF Me u: 'Pralriefire' Pralrlefire Crabapple 1.5' B &B 8 SSC Malus 'Spring Snow' Spring Snow Crabapple 1.5' B &B 7 JTL Syringe reticulate Japanese Tree Lilac 1.5" B&B SHRUBS 12 OWE Euonymus aiotus 'Compactue' Dwarf Winged Euonymus 5 Gal. Pot 6 IH Comus alba 'Baghalo' Ivory Halo Dogwood 5 Gal. Pot 11 AH Hydrangea arborescene 'Annabelle' Annabelle Hydrangea 5 Gal. Pot 16 AHC Viburnum trnobum American Highbush Cranberry 5 Gal. Pot 9 AWS Spiraeo x bumalda 'Anthony Waterer' Anthony Waterer Spirea 3 Gal. Pot 33 GF Spiraeo x bumalda ' Goidflame' Goldflame Splrea 3 Gal. Pot 34 GM Spiraeo x bumalda ' Goldmound' Goldmound Spires 3 Gal. Pot 17 GJR Shrub rose 'Garden Jubilee Funny Face' Funny Face, Shrub Rose 3 Gal. Pot 50 Si Junipems scbIna Scondia' Scandia Juniper 5 Gal. Pot 23 HJ Junlperus horizontally 'Hughes' Hughes Juniper 5 Gal. Pot 26 TY Toms x media 'Tountonii' - Taunton Yew 5 Gal. Pot 8 KFG Colamagrostis acutiflora 'Karl Forester' Karl Forester Feather Reed Grass 2 Gal. Pot 36 SD Hemerocallls 'Stella de Odo' Stella de Oro Daylily 2 Gal. Pot 27 H Hosts, several species Hosta, mixed varieties 2 Gal. Pot 14 B Accent Boulders 24 " -36" die. (located from on site if possible) Flower garden to be a mixture of annual and perennial flowers. PLANTING NOTES: Contractor shall provide one year guarantee of all plant materials. The guarantee begins on the date of the Landscape Architect's written acceptance of the Initial planting. Replacement plant materials shall also have a one year guarantee commencing upon planting. All plant. to be northern -grown and hardy. Plants to be Installed as per standard AAN planting practices. Use minimum 12' loam planting sae on trees and 6' on shrubs. Contractor shall verify locations with all ulAglm prior to Installation of plants. All landscaping and sod areas shall be Irrigated with an underground sprinkler. Slaking of trees optional; reposition if not plumb after one year. Wrap all smooth- barked trees - fasten top and bottom. Remove by April 1. Open top of burlap on BB materials; remove pot on potted plants. split and break apart peat pots. Prune plants as necessary - per standard nursery practice. Owner shall be responsible for maintenance after acceptance of the work by the Owner. Plants shall be Immediately planted upon arrived at site. Property hed -In materials If necessary, temporary only. All disturbed areas to be sodded unless otherwise noted. Sod shall be northern grown and hardy. Planting beds for shrubs shall hove (4 oz min.) weed barrier fabric, 4' - 6' of 1 -1/2' washed Rlwr Rock mulch and 4' vertical ( commerclol grade) black poly edging. The edging shall be placed and staked with smooth curves. A 24" wide rock mulch maintenance strip shall be Installed around the entire bulldlnC. Maintenance strip shall hove weed barrier fabric under rock and edged with commercial edging. Shredded hardwood mulch 4" deep shall be provided around all installed trees. No retaining walls ore proposed Any future walls are not the responsibility of the Landscape Architect. Contractor shall provide a plan of the flower gardens to be approved by the Owner prior to Installation. Infiltration ponds shall be seeded with a native wetland seed mix to be approved by the City. Raised garden beds shall be constructed of untreated timbers and be filled with loamy planting soils. i I I I A ` Y - Al i 50 0 50 100 150 Scale 1" 50' 051046 II Y °1e al a 0 m o z w to z J ° AF 0�_ O h�� = or 0 g Jm CO mul22a qo 0 w e O� � r�'.r "►�7 me o rti,4 >.a�m 9 C4 ry N c a ` V V -H m'a .r¢ ruuem C7 08/17/05 •' :y I vt r4H`%' y?3 s'ii wF • • •'4 •' 7 Y4 /� — Ir // I [_ ��' "'p• .'�.• / ,r BUILDING J� p%O Off, • fir;; :•.. P.'•, O' Y BEDS I RL LINE OF PARKING 1 i DL GARAGE BELOW qP ;y 4 s CD DID +<-3� Q\ C I ! so •• b ••� ` i' / ;;/ / LINE OF BUILDING ABOVE ryiFJ. `.•y/J•! MAIN j I 3(JJ:: EHfRANCE 1 I r;;•?, i' / 5' CONCRETE GARAGE j WALK. TYP. ENTRY /E%rt I 1 Elul oe ORW- RMWATER BOND _ / i COQ�IEii€ STO 1 SITE PLAN 1• • 30' -0• i I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 � 1 LL) w r-- (n 0 Ll_I \ 0 2 \ MOM \ REVISION rn wAM� a.ws an wAww an wn�o an errrr. OIY YRlA4 OIY WRA4. 1a�oA�s �• IleeQ lr• COMM .Om I 3 U �F =o u � o L- Lu Z Z E`�32 O o Z v Jill 021 3z 11151 gg11 am MAN A200 "-POT- P rLHIV 1 ins• r -o• � a eEWHON OIY RAIMY W VN O!Y RN•Y OIY RIwP Q!I YIIf1Y O!Y YRTYr OIY YIlT11. IU�O�101 LR Comm -0li 012 s a y p� d C 3 IU -0 o� W,- z E 06 �b '^ w S � &o o� Z - 3e A300 1 FIR�TF LOOR PLAN 1/18• 0• m COIOA W621 g d s U a wN U�ow w z CC �z C 3 � N Q W O t e �g A301 THIRD FLOOR PLAN 1 V18• D m" . MUM wmnjm � �a �a cor+.om Iii-I VMS i � Lu N wz �-3f L N 0 A303 1 FOURTH FLOOR PLAN WaUE 6 NEV{BION ptM1W R. Comm •0641 till a U p N w z C �z C 31 p O sz L N Q ' ^ W O �. to FOU� FLOW MM A304 RU TSS BRG. :a• EL: BOARD TRIM FOURTH FLOOR, BOARD TRIM 13CARD SIDING V T.O. SUBFLOOR SHINGLES BOARD SIDING EL: THIRD D FLOOR. , EFT■ ■■ _ _____ __ __ -_ _ = ----- T.O. SUBFLOOR I$IEL: __ _�'� _ u u WE 122'- ' BRICK ■■ _ ■■ ■ ■ SECOND FLOOR, EAST ELEVATION in T.O. SUBFLOOR -- I_■ ■■ EL 111' -11_ _ III■■ FIRST FLOOR, ■ ■ ■'' Mal dM■�� 0. PRECAST 7. AS ���' n EL 100 -0 In ■ - — 91u19 GARAGE SLAB — _ _ ■._: _ _ --------------- EL B9 -O EAST ELEVATION vTe• - *o• ALUMINUM RAILINGS mm CEMENT FIBER BOARD TRIM STONE \— ROCKFACE CMU UNTEL ROCKFACE CMU CEMENT FIBER BOARD SIDING CEMENT FIBER CEMENT FIBER ' BRICK STONE • ALUMINUM BOARD TRIM BOARD TRIM SILL RAILINGS z FRONT ENTRY ELEVATION vTe• • r-0• CEMENT FIBER BOARD TRIM SOUTH ELEVATION s T7 • r•o• ALUMINUM CEMENT FIBER RAILINGS BOARD TRIM BOARD TRIM FIBER CEMENT :a• CEMENT FIBER BOARD TRIM CEMENT n BOARD SIDING r SHINGLES BOARD TRIM 13CARD SIDING BOARD TRII SHINGLES BOARD SIDING EFT■ ■■ _ _____ __ __ -_ _ = ----- ___ ___ _ _ __ ___ ___ ___ ___ - - - - - -- __ = - = - __ _�'� _ u u WE ■ ■ BRICK ■■ _ ■■ ■ ■ - = -- _ _ _ ____ _____ - - � ��� ;--- EAST ELEVATION in ■ ■ -- I_■ ■■ _ III■■ ■ ■� ■ ■ ■'' Mal dM■�� �■ ���' n - -,:_- - In ■ - — 91u19 — _ _ ■._: _ _ --------------- II II - a- .■. ___ ■ -= — �1�11[II� __= CEMENT FIBER BOARD TRIM CEMENT FIBER BOARD TRIM ASPHALTIC CEMENT FIBER SHINGLES BOARD SIDING _____ __ __ -_ _ = ----- ___ ___ _ _ __ ___ ___ ___ ___ - - - - - -- __ = - = - __ _�'� _ u u �- CEMENT FIBER BRICK BOARD SIDING - = -- _ _ _ ____ _____ - - � ��� ;--- EAST ELEVATION _ _- - - ■_III a vTe• • r-0• ALUMINUM RAILINGS MGM E REVISION OII IINMG vl0la m• awar s O�n RI_p om 41�aITY. om uarrr• rn euerrtw. 1WOale• R• A9TTCaa! R• GO Mm -Oam e 4 1 e T i� +�, 4 ILK KEY PLAN 4 EAST ELEVATION ve• - r•o• _____ __ __ -_ _ = ----- ___ ___ _ _ __ ___ ___ ___ ___ - - - - - -- __ = - = - __ _�'� _ u u �- = = - - - - = -- _ _ _ ____ _____ - - � ��� ;--- __ ___ _ =- - _ - -- _ _- - - ■_III --------- - BFbCK ALUMINUM RAILINGS MGM E REVISION OII IINMG vl0la m• awar s O�n RI_p om 41�aITY. om uarrr• rn euerrtw. 1WOale• R• A9TTCaa! R• GO Mm -Oam e 4 1 e T i� +�, 4 ILK KEY PLAN 4 EAST ELEVATION ve• - r•o• SILL " LINTEL LW -Fl; ; BOARD SIDING BOARD SIDING &NORTH ELEVATION vie• - r-o• STON UNTEL SILL 9 WtA I tLtVA I IUN vTe• • ro• v t a g3 i Q -0 °0 ELu �Z 0 0 � _Z c� a• ySi t` B E dal $ 8 EK79e01 ELEVATKMB A500 _____ __ __ -_ _ = ----- ___ ___ _ _ __ ___ ___ ___ ___ - - - - - -- __ = - = - __ _�'� _ u u �- = = - - - - = -- _ _ _ ____ _____ - - � ��� ;--- __ ___ _ =- - _ - -- _ _- - - ■_III --------- - - - - - -- - - - --- - ------ n - -,:_- - ,I::I /:::1��� 91u19 ■._: II II II - .■. ___ ■ -= — �1�11[II� __= — _____== mmsuul — --------------------- � =_ I�JIII -.■ := = ■ � �� III II II II — �II■��u = ___________ — ::_ __==== _ae�w0��eol�ai� __..:.___�:.= _.B..IMl:a.1.1n II II �I�I,AI 11 MEN E �0.7�19■ill :a- a a- I _ _ _ ------------------------------------ _ _ ------ - _ _ _ _ __. _ - _ _ __ _ __ _— _ - - -__ _ - _ —_ —__ ____ ___— ________ __ _ IN p __— _ - -____ _ - -_ —__ —__ — ___ _ ■ _ . . ■ 4A ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ = :.. 017.1 11I� .:■ - ��■I . =DOW � ,1:::::: —Mir �■ -_ -= -� = = - __ - - - _- _ MEEFEE Emil _ - - - lip— SILL " LINTEL LW -Fl; ; BOARD SIDING BOARD SIDING &NORTH ELEVATION vie• - r-o• STON UNTEL SILL 9 WtA I tLtVA I IUN vTe• • ro• v t a g3 i Q -0 °0 ELu �Z 0 0 � _Z c� a• ySi t` B E dal $ 8 EK79e01 ELEVATKMB A500 TRUSS 8RG EL: 142' -S FOURTH, FLI T.O. SUBFLI EL: 133' -5 THIRD FLOC L. - FIRST F GARAGE SLAB EL: 89' -0' . EAST ELEVATION vre••ro• KEY PLAN Gz R3BlE 8 REVI&OII em w.ww ovnnti a�T wA�o an wAwo mr urrrw. an unrw. •a=ato �. AR9lIA1 �. Comm -oam i3 ISM w Z E 3" O ° Z � w yy� 4~ a� s_ is QEXTEFIM B"ATI A501 ow e v 4� �y • t ,�roRpOPJ'��/ ees AGENDA ITEM III.& APPEAL OF DECISION - ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 5200 WEST 73' STREET (ACCREDITED INVESTORS) CONTINUED TO OCTOBER 4, 2005 No packet data [-] Oral presentation Information coming 0 To: Mayor & City Council From: John Wallin Finance Director Date: September 6, 2005 Subject: Ordinance No. 2005 -9 Change Storm Sewer Rates Effective Fourth Quarter Utility Bills r. REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item # IV.A Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ I Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion . ❑ Resolution ® Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Adopt Ordinance 2005 -9 changing storm water rates effective the fourth quarter billing (November, 2005 through, January, 2006). Info /Background: At the August 16 Council meeting the Council approved a special assessment policy which included a provision _to increase storm water rates to pay for curb and gutter for street reconstruction projects. The attached .ordinance will increase storm water rates by $4 per quarter for each residential equivalent unit effective for the fourth quarter billing beginning with the November utility bills. Of this amount, $2 is to fund current utility projects including the "below the ground" storm sewer portions of the current street projects and the additional $2 is to fund the curb and gutter of the existing projects. G THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. The following described fees of Schedule A to Code Section 185 are amended to read as follows: Section 2. The effective date of this Ordinance shall be October 31, 2005. ATTEST: City Clerk First Reading: Second Reading: Adopted: Mayor PURPOSE OF SECTION SUBSECTION FEEXHARGE AMOUNT 1110 1110.03 Storm Water Drainage $10.74 per quarter Charge pursuant to formula in Subsection 1110.03 Section 2. The effective date of this Ordinance shall be October 31, 2005. ATTEST: City Clerk First Reading: Second Reading: Adopted: Mayor AGENDA ITEM: V.A. O e DATE: September 6, 2005 �y ,eee REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: Patty Latham, Information Technology Manager VIA: GORDON L. HUGHES, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 ITEM DESCRIPTION: Contract No. IT 05 -01, Improvement No. F.O. -003, Fiber Optic Cabling — St. Louis Park to Edina City Hall COMPANY BID AMOUNT 1. Castrejon, Inc. 2. MP Nexlevel, LLC, 3. Parsons Electric, LLC 4. Michels Corporation 5. Parallel Technologies, Inc. 6. MasTec North America, Inx. RECOMMENDED BID: Castrejon, Inc. - Base Bid plus Alternate Bid #2 - 1. 125,630.00 2. 144,121.00 3. 151,530.00 4. 170,660.00 5. 175,800.00 6. 212,416.00 $125,630.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This project is for laying underground conduits and fiber optic cabling from the Edina City Hall building to Wooddale and 41" Street. The project will connect the City of Edina to LOGIS. It will provide increased bandwidth (speed) and control over vital City computer operations and phone /communications systems. The project is funded under the City's Capital Improvement Program. A portion of this funding ($12,860) will.be funded by the City of Saint Louis Park. Alternate Bid #2 provided an extension of this cabling between their Excelsior and Grand Police Substation and the Saint Louis Park City Hall. We have received a letter from their City Manager authorizing their portion of the bid under his authority. Edina's portion of the Bid is $112,770 and the CIP budget for the item was $125,000. Signature The Rec p(within budget) MINISTRATION Department F-1 (not within budget) rd6n L. Hughes, QkManager j6hn Wallin, Finance Director TO: Mayor & City Council REQUEST FOR PURCHASE FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Public Works VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: September 6, 2005 ITEM DESCRIPTION: Crushing of Blacktop and Concrete Company 1. Minneapolis Concrete Recyclers 2. Semple Recycling and Crushing RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Minneapolis Concrete Recyclers GENERAL INFORMATION: AGENDA ITEM V. B. Amount of Quote or Bid 1. $2.95 per Ton 2. $3.50 per Ton $2.95 per Ton This purchase is for the crushing and recycling of our concrete and blacktop material as generated by City Public Works and Parks projects. Two bids were received for this work, calculated on not to exceed 11,000 tons of material and a completion date by end of 2005. This purchase will be funded by the aeneral Public Works budget. Staff recommends awardN this to Minneapolis Concrete Recyclers. Signature The Recommended Bid is within budget not within Public Works — Streets Department , Hughes, C y� es 1 alliK, Pinance Director r RECOMMENDATION: Receive Report and Recommendation of the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission, conclude public hearing, and consider resolution approving transfer. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached is the Report to the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission Regarding the proposed transfer of Control from Time Warner Cable, Inc., to Comcast Corporation. Representatives of the Cable Commission will attend the September 6, 2005, meeting for the purpose of presenting their report and the recommendation of the Commission with respect to the transfer. The Commission will meet on the evening of September 1, 2005, for the purpose of adopting their recommendation. D a o� e ryQj Tv" IBRPBe A . . REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item VI.A. From: GORDON L. HUGHES Consent ❑ CITY MANAGER Information Only ❑ Date: SEPTEMBER 6, 2005 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP ® Motion TIME- WARNER CABLE TO o ❑ Resolution COMCAST ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion RECOMMENDATION: Receive Report and Recommendation of the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission, conclude public hearing, and consider resolution approving transfer. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached is the Report to the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission Regarding the proposed transfer of Control from Time Warner Cable, Inc., to Comcast Corporation. Representatives of the Cable Commission will attend the September 6, 2005, meeting for the purpose of presenting their report and the recommendation of the Commission with respect to the transfer. The Commission will meet on the evening of September 1, 2005, for the purpose of adopting their recommendation. D a c T J , REPORT/ RECOMMENDATION - Time Warner Cable Transfer to Comcast September 6, 2005 Page two The Council will recall that it conducted a public hearing on August 2, 2005, concerning the transfer. The Council continued the hearing until the September 6, 2005, meeting for the purpose of receiving additional testimony. At this writing, no additional letters or comments have been received from the public with respect to the transfer. Following the presentation of the report and recommendation by representatives of the Commission, the Council should again receive testimony from individuals attending the meeting. `The Council should then close the public hearing and consider adoption of the resolution approving the proposed change of control of Time Warner. If the Council wishes to continue consideration of the transfer, you may do so, however, according to law, the Council must either approve or reject the transfer no later than the October 4, 2005, meeting. Reportto-the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission Regarding The Proposed Transfer of Control of Time Warner Cable, Inc. Irc Comcast Corporation August 26, 2005 Prepared by: Brian T. Grogan, Esq. Yuri B. Berndt, Esq. Moss &. Barnett A Professional Association 4800 Wells Fargo Center 90 South Seventh Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 -4129 (612) 347 -0340 (phone) (612) 339 -6686 (facsimile) Table of Contents Section 1. Executive Summary ..................................................... ..............................1 Section2. Applicable Law ............................................................. ..............................6 Section 3. Description of the Transaction ..................................... .............................10 Section 4. Legal Qualifications ..................................................... .............................12 Section 5. Technical Qualifications .............................................. .............................15 Section 6. Financial Qualifications ............................................... .............................17 Section 7. Recommendation ...................................................... ............................... 27 Exhibit A City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota Resolution —Approving Transfer.......... A -1 Exhibit B City of Edina, Minnesota Resolution — Approving Transfer .................... B -1 Exhibit C City of Hopkins, Minnesota Resolution — Approving Transfer ................0 -1 Exhibit D City of Minnetonka, Minnesota Resolution —Approving Transfer........... D -1 Exhibit E City of Richfield, Minnesota Resolution — Approving Transfer ................ E -1 798148vi i Section 9. Executive Summary This report has been provided by Moss & Barnett, a Professional Association, for the express purpose of evaluating a request from Time Warner Cable Inc. ( "Time Warner") the current holder of the cable television franchise ( "Franchise ") in the cities of Eden Prairie, Edina, Hopkins, Minnetonka and Richfield, Minnesota, ( "Member Cities ") to approve a proposed transfer of the Franchise and cable system to a wholly -owned subsidiary (Cable Holdco II, Inc.) of Comcast Corporation ( "Comcast"). The Southwest Suburban Cable Commission ( "Commission ") has been granted certain powers by the Member Cities to enforce and administer provisions of the Franchises of the Member Cities. Pursuant to those powers, the Commission will use this Report to make a recommendation to each of the Member Cities with respect to the proposed transfer. Pursuant to each Member Cities' Cable Television Regulatory Ordinance ( "Cable Ordinance "), this proposed transfer to Comcast is prohibited without the written consent of the Member Cities. Federal law provides the Member Cities with a period of 120 days to examine the legal, technical and financial qualifications of the proposed transferee. The below is only a summary of the Transaction, qualifications and recommendations contained within this report. Readers are strongly encouraged to review the entire report for a more thorough analysis of these issues. Description of the Transaction. The proposed transaction whereby the Franchise and cable system will transfer from Time Warner to Comcast is extraordinarily complex and is described in greater detail in Section 6 herein ( "Transaction's. In general terms the Transaction calls for Time Warner and Comcast to acquire substantially all of the assets of Adelphia Communications Corporation ( "Adelphia ") for a total of $12.7 billion in cash and 16% of the common stock of Time Warner's cable subsidiary, Time Warner Cable, Inc. In addition, Time Warner and Comcast will swap certain cable systems and Time Warner will redeem Comcast's interest of 17.9% in Time Warner Cable and 4.7% in Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P. As a result of the Transaction, Time Warner Cable will gain approximately 3.5 million basic subscribers bringing its total subscriber count to approximately $14.4 million. Time Warner will own 84% of Time Warner Cable's common stock at the time of closing. Comcast will emerge from the proposed transaction with approximately $1.8 million additional basic subscribers resulting from a net cash investment of approximately $1.5 billion. Following close of the transaction Comcast will serve approximately 23.3 million customers and Comcast will divest its interest in Time Warner Cable as well as Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P. in transactions that are designed to be tax -free to all parties. 798148VI Le-gal Qualifications. The legal qualification standard related primarily to analysis of whether Comcast 1) is authorized to proceed with the proposed Transaction, and 2) is authorized to operate and control the cable television system serving the Member Cities. The applicable standard of review is that the Member Cities consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. The proposed transaction calls for Cable Holdco II, Inc. to serve as the franchisee in each of the. Member Cities. As of the date this report was filed the Office of the Secretary of State for the State of Minnesota had no record of Cable Holdco II, Inc. In response to inquiries by the Commission, Comcast responded that Cable Holdco II, Inc. "will be duly qualified to transact business in Minnesota as of the effective time of closing, and documentation of its qualification will be provided at that time." We recommend that any approval of the Transaction should be contingent upon the provision of certificates of authority provided by the Office of the Secretary of State verifying that Cable Holdco II, Inc. is duly qualified to transact business in the State of Minnesota: So long as that condition is included in any proposed resolution we believe it would be unreasonable for the Member Cities to find that upon closing of the Transaction the proposed transferee, MOC Holdco II, Inc. and proposed franchisee, Cable Holdco II, Inc. will not be legally qualified to own and operate the system. Technical Qualifications. The technical qualification standard relates to Comcast's technical expertise and experience in operating and maintaining cable television systems. In such a review, the standard is once again that the Member Cities consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. The proposed transferee, MOC Holdco 11, Inc., is ultimately wholly -owned by Comcast Corporation, a publicly traded Pennsylvania corporation. Comcast Corporation is the nations largest cable television operator with over 21.5 million cable customers in 35 states. Comcast is also the cable operator in a number of Minnesota jurisdictions, including the cities of`Eagan, Burnsville, Inver Grove Heights, South St. Paul, St. Paul, Woodbury, Roseville, Maple Grove, Golden Valley, and others. In all, Comcast presently serves over 75 separate jurisdictions in the State of Minnesota as a result of its acquisition of the systems formally held by AT &T Broadband. The Commission raised numerous questions of Comcast regarding its proposed integration of the Time Warner systems, including any proposed changes in system operation, programming line -up, billing system and customer service. Comcast provided vague replies to these inquiries rendering it impossible for the Commission to determine precisely how Comcast will attempt to integrate Time Warner's systems and 7981480 2 operations. Comcast simply committed to comply with the existing franchise obligations, including local community programming obligations. However, based on the standard of review we conclude it would be unreasonable for the Member Cities to find that, upon closing of the proposed Transaction, MOC Holdco II, Inc. (the proposed transferee) and Cable Holdco II, Inc. (the proposed franchisee) will not be technically qualified to own and operate the system. Financial Qualifications. Neither federal law nor FCC regulations provide franchising authorities with any guidance concerning the evaluation of the financial qualifications of a transfer applicant for a cable franchise.' In certain circumstances, it'is appropriate to consider the .performance of an applicant based upon the applicant's historical performance. We have provided general financial data relevant to the operation of a public company and as used by financial analysts evaluating public companies. Due to the size and scope of Comcast's operations, a,comparison of its financial data with other competitors provides only minimal insight into the financial capabilities of Comcast. Based upon the selected financial information, which we reviewed, the following is a summary of various financial factors from operations for the twelve =month period ended December 31, 2004 and the three -month period ended March 31, 2005 and balance sheet dates of December 31, 2004 and March 3.1, 2005. �1. nEBITDA/revenue* Cash flow percentage) 40.9% 35.4 %(1) 2 Operating Income Percentage* (Operating Income/Revenue) 14.3% o 16.1 k {1) 3. Debt/Equity Ratio* (long-term debt/total equity) .49:1. .47:1(1) 4. Current Ratio* current assets /current liabilities) .41:1 .33:1(1) (1) Ratios determined as of March 31, 2005. * Data based upon Financial Information in Comcast's 2004 Form 10-K and 2005 First Quarter Form 10 -0. Assets. Comcast's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) as of December 31, 2004 of .41:1 is significantly below a typical investor standard of 1.0:1, which means that Comcast will be required to find other sources of funds (other than current assets) to pay is current liabilities. FCC Form 394 does reference whether the proposed transferee "has sufficient liquid assets on hand or available from committed resources to consummate the transaction and operate the facilities for three months.' This reference, however, does not necessarily constitute the definitive standard for financial qualifications. 798148v1 3 Liabilities. Comcast's debt to equity ratio is favorable as the amount of Comcast's equity is almost two times its debt. This favorable ratio is largely the result of Comcast's previous acquisition of AT &T Corp.'s broadband business in 2002.2 Income and Expense. Comcast had an operating cash flow percentage for the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 of 40.9 %, and the author notes that this ratio has improved significantly from the 2000 and 2001 combined AT &T Comcast Corporation ratios which were approximately 23% - 24 %.3 This is a positive indication of the financial health of Comcast. Cash flow and the cash flow percentage provide a measure of the ability of a business entity to generate cash. Financing. Comcast will have significant debt obligations in excess of $24.672 billion as of the date of the Transaction.4 Comcast also noted that it has $3.839 billion of funds immediately available under its credit facilities as of March 31, 2005 which will allow Comcast to continue to offset its negative current working capital in the short term. 5 Comcast also has cash, cash equivalents and short term investments of $636 million as of March 31, 2005! Based upon the financial information supplied by the management of Comcast and Comcast's, history of expanding services and revenues of newly acquired systems, Comcast should have sufficient liquid assets for short-term operations and capital expenditures, from operations and available financing through the initial period after the Transactions. Based upon the foregoing and' limited strictly to the Financial Statements reviewed by Moss & Barnett in conducting this review, we believe it would be unreasonable for the Member Cities to find that Comcast does not possess sufficient financial qualifications subject to limitations set forth below. In the event the Member Cities elect to proceed with approving the assignment of the franchise, the assessment of Comcast's financial qualification should not be construed in any way to constitute an opinion as to the financial capability or stability of Comcast to (1) operate its existing franchise operation; (ii) to operate the Systems; or (iii) successfully consummate.the Transactions contemplated by the various agreements as discussed in Section II hereof or future acquisitions upon which we express no opinion. This efficiency of the procedures used in making an assessment of Comcast's financial qualifications and its capability to become the successor operator of the Systems is solely the responsibility of each Member City. Consequently, we make no representation regarding this efficiency of the procedures used either for the purpose for 2 Form 10 -K at p. 48. 3 AT &T Comcast Corporation Form S-4 for the year ending December 31, 2001, filed February 11, 2002 with the Securities and Exchange Commission at pp. 111 4-8. and AT &T Comcast Corporation, Form S-4 Amendment No. 1 filed April 10, 2002 with the Securities and Exchange Commission at pp. 111 4-7. Willard Letter at p. 7. 5 Form 10 -Q at p. 9. eIdatp.2. 7. Comcast Investor Presentation dated April 21, 2005. 798148v1 4 which this analysis of financial capability and qualifications was requested or for any other purpose. Recommendation. Based specifically on the foregoing information and analysis, we believe it would be unreasonable for the Member Cities to find that upon closing of the Transaction the proposed transferee, MOC Holdco 11, Inc. as well as the Franchisee (Cable Holdco II, Inc.) will not be legally and technically qualified to own and operate the cable system. With respect to the financial qualifications review, the reader is referred to the financial qualifications summary set forth on page 25 herein. Based on the foregoing, we recommend that the Member Cities review this report, listen to any additional public comment or information, as necessary or appropriate, and undertake all necessary action to pass and adopt a resolution in form and content similar to the document attached hereto as Exhibit A. 7981480 5 Section 2.. Applicable Law The following provisions of federal law, state law and the Cable Ordinance govern the actions of the Member Cities in acting on the request for approval of the proposed transfer. FEDERAL LAW The Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, as amended by the Cable Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992 and the Telecommunications Act of 1996 ("Cable Act"), provides at Section 617 (47 U.S.C. § 537): Sales of Cable Systems. -A franchising authority-shall, if the franchise requires franchising authority approval of a sale or transfer, have 920 days to act upon any request for approval of such sale or transfer that contains or is accompanied by such information as is required in accordance with Commission regulations and by the franchising authority. if the franchising authority fails to render a final decision on the request within 920 days, such request shall be deemed granted unless the requesting party and the franchising authority agree to an extension of time. The Cable Act also provides at Section 613(d) (47 U.S.C. § 533(d)) as follows: (d) Regulation of ownership by States or franchising authorities. Any State or franchising authority may not prohibit the ownership or control of a cable system by any person because of such person's ownership or control of any other media of mass communications or other media interests. Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent any State or franchising authority from prohibiting the ownership or control of a cable system in a jurisdiction by any person (9) because of such person's ownership or control of any other cable system in such jurisdiction, or (2) in circumstances in which the State or franchising authority determines that the acquisition of such a cable system may eliminate or reduce competition in the delivery of cable service in such jurisdiction. Further, the Federal Communications Commission ( "FCC ") has promulgated regulations governing the sale of cable systems. Section 76.502 of the FCC's regulations (47 C.F.R. § 76.502) provides: Time Limits Applicable to Franchise Authority Consideration of Transfer Applications. (a) A franchise authority shall have 920 days from the date of submission of a completed FCC Form 394, together with all exhibits, and any additional information required by the terms of the franchise agreement or applicable state or local law to act upon an application to sell, assign, or otherwise transfer controlling ownership of a cable. system. 798148VI 6 r. (b) A franchise authority that questions the accuracy of the infonnation provided under paragraph (a) must notify the cable operator within 30 days of the filing of such information, or such information shall be deemed accepted, unless the cable operator has failed to provide any additional information reasonably requested by the franchise authority within 10. days of such request (c) If the franchise authority fails to act upon such transfer request within 120 days, such request shall be deemed granted unless the franchise authority and the requesting party otherwise agree to an extension of time. STATE LAW Minnesota Statutes Section 238.083 provides: Sale or Transfer of Franchise. Subd. 9. ' Fundamental corporate change defined. For purposes of this section, "fundamental corporate changea. means the sale or transfer of a majority of a corporation's assets; meager, including a parent and its subsidiary corporation; consolidation; or creation of a subsidiary corporation. Subd. 2. Written approval of franchising authority. A sale or transfer of a franchise, including a sale or transfer by means of a fundamental corporate change, requires the written approval of the franchising authority. The parties to the sale or transfer of a franchise shall make a written request to the franchising authority for its approval of the sale or transfer. Subd. 3. Repealed, 2004 c 261 art 7 s 29 Subd. 4. Approval or denial of transfer request: The franchising authority shall approve or deny in writing the sale or transfer request. The approval must not be unreasonably withheld. Subd. 5. Repealed, 2004 c 261 art 7 s 29 Subd. 6. Transfer of stock; controlling Interest defined. Sale or transfer of stock in a corporation so as to create a new controlling interest in a cable communication system is subject to the requirements of this section. The term "controlling interest" as used herein is not limited to majority stock ownership, but includes actual working control in whatever manner exercised. 7981480 7. LOCAL LAW Each of the Member Cities has an identical Cable Ordinance covering the transfer of cable television franchises. The Cable Ordinance at Section 25, provides: Sec. 25. Transfer of Ownership. A. A Franchise shall. not be assigned or transferred, either in whole or in part, or leased, sublet or mortgaged in any manner, nor shall title thereto, either legal or equitable or any right, interest or property therein, pass to or vest in any person other than an Affiliate of Grantee without the prior written consent of City, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. Further, Grantee shall not sell or transfer any stock or ownership interest so as to create a new controlling interest except with the consent of City, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. B. Any sale or transfer of Franchise, including a sale or transfer by means of a fundamental corporate change, requires the written approval of City. The parties to the sale or transfer of Franchise shall make a written request to City for its consent City shall reply in writing within 30 days of actual receipt of the request and shall indicate its approval of the request or its determination that a public hearing is necessary. City shall conduct a public hearing on the request within 30 days of such detenmination if it determines that a sale or transfer of Franchise may adversely affect the Grantee's subscribers. C. Unless otherwise already provided for by, local law, notice of any such hearing shall be given 94 days prior to the hearing by publishing notice thereof once in a newspaper of general circulation in the City. The notice shall contain the date,_ time and place of the hearing and shall briefly state the substance of the action to be considered by City. Within 30 days after the public hearing, City shall approve or deny in writing the sale or transfer request D. In a sale or transfer of only a Franchise, without the inclusion of the System in which at least substantial initial construction has commenced, a Grantee shall be required to establish to the sole satisfaction of City that the sale or transfer of a Franchise is in the public interest. E. For purposes of this section, fundamental corporate change means the sale or transfer of a controlling interest in the stock of a corporation or the sale or transfer of all or a majority of a corporation's assets, merger (including a parent and its subsidiary corporation), consolidation or creation of a subsidiary corporation. For the purposes of this Section, fundamental partnership change means the sale or transfer of all or a majority of a partnership's assets, change of a general partner in a limited partnership, change from a limited to a general partnership, incorporation of a partnership, or change in the control of a partnership. 798148v1 8 F. The word "control". as used herein, shall apply to the sale or transfer of all or a majority of Grantee's assets or shares of stock, merger (including any parent and its subsidiary corporation), consolidation, creation of a subsidiary corporation of the parent company, or sale or transfer of stock in Grantee so as to create a new controlling interest. The term "controlling interest" as used herein is not limited to majority stock ownership, but includes actual working control in whatever manner exercised, including the creation or transfer of decision- making authority to a new or dMerent board of directors. Every change, transfer or acquisition of control of a Grantee shall make the Franchise subject to cancellation unless and until City shall have consented in writing thereto, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. For the purpose of determining whether it shall consent to such change, transfer or acquisition of control, City may inquire into the qualifications of the prospective controlling party. The City reserves the right to seek reimbursement of its costs for conducting an inquiry to the extent permitted by applicable state and federal law. The preceding statement does not constitute an agreement by any party to reimburse the City. G. In no event shall a transfer or assignment of ownership or control be approved without transferee becoming a signatory to a Franchise. H. Any transferee of a Franchise shall be subordinate to any right, title or interest of City. L For information on the. right of,the City to purchase the cable system during a transfer of ownership, see Section 26. J. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, no such consent or approval shall be required for a transfer or assignment to any Person controlling, controlled by or under the same common control as the Grantee. 79814OVI 9 Section 3. Description of the.Transaction Overview.Of Transaction The proposed transaction whereby the Franchise and cable system will transfer from Time Warner to Comcast is extraordinarily complex and is described in greater detail in Section 6 herein ("Transaction "). In general terms the Transaction calls for Time Warner and Comcast to acquire substantially all of the assets of Adelphia Communications Corporation ( "Adelphia ") for a total of $12.7 billion in cash and 16% of the common stock of Time Warner's cable subsidiary, Time Warner Cable, Inc. In addition, Time Warner and Comcast will swap certain cable systems and Time Warner will redeem Comcast's interest of 17.9% in Time Warner Cable and 4.7% in Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P. As a result of the Transaction, Time Warner Cable will gain approximately 3.5 million basic subscribers bringing its total subscriber count to approximately $14.4 million. Time Warner will own 84 %. of Time Warner Cable's common stock at the time of closing. Comcast will emerge from the proposed transaction with approximately $1.8 million additional basic subscribers resulting from a net cash investment of approximately $1.5 billion. Following close of the transaction Comcast will serve approximately 23.3 million customers and Comcast will divest its interest in Time Warner Cable as well as Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P. in transactions that are designed to be tax -free to all parties. Time Warner Cable and Comcast will each acquire a portion of Adelphia's assets representing approximately 5 million basic cable customers. Time Warner Cable will pay $9.2 billion in cash and will issue common shares representing 16% of Time Warner Cable's outstanding common equity (taking into account the redemption transaction with Comcast) to Adelphia stakeholders in connection with its acquisition agreement. Comcast will pay $3.5 billion in cash. With respect to the proposed system swaps between Time Warner Cable and Comcast, Time Warner Cable will redeem Comcast's 17.9% interest in Time Warner Cable in exchange for a subsidiary holding Time Warner cable systems serving nearly 600,000 subscribers as well as approximately $1.856 billion in cash. Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P. will redeem Comcast's 4.7% interest in that company, now held in an FCC mandated trust, in exchange for cable systems serving more than 150,000, as well as approximately $133 million in cash. Thus, Comcast's net cash investment in all of the transactions will be $1.5 billion. The purchase of the Adelphia assets is not dependent upon the occurrence of the system swaps nor the redemption transactions between Time Warner and Comcast. if successful the acquisition will be accounted for as an asset purchase. The proposed transaction is subject to numerous regulatory reviews and approvals. These reviews and approvals include the Heart- Scott - Rodino review, FCC review, 798148VI 10 J approval by the bankruptcy court having jurisdiction of Adelphia's Chapter 11 case, approval by Adelphia's creditors, and approval by local franchising authorities including the Member Cities. 798146A 11 Standard of Review The legal qualification standard related primarily to analysis of whether Comcast 1) is authorized to proceed with the proposed Transaction, and 2) is authorized to operate and control the cable television system serving the Member Cities. The applicable standard of review is that the Member Cities consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. The Transaction is described in the charts immediately following this Section 4 of this report. The Transaction calls for the franchise to be assigned to Cable Holdco II, Inc. and thereafter MOC Holdco II, Inc., a subsidiary wholly -owned by Comcast Corporation (through intermediate entities) will acquire the stock of Cable Holdco II, Inc. In the end, Cable Holdco II, Inc. will be the franchisee for the system serving the Member Cities. The proposed transaction calls for Cable Holdco II, Inc. to serve as the franchisee in each of the Member Cities. As of the date this report was filed the Office of the Secretary of State for the State of Minnesota had no record of Cable Holdco II, Inc. In response to inquiries by the Commission, Comcast responded that Cable Holdco II, Inc. "will be duly qualified to transact business in Minnesota as of the effective time of closing, and documentation of its qualification will be provided at that time." The Commission also raised questions regarding the acquisition of Adelphia by both Time Warner and Comcast and /or their respective affiliates. In response, Comcast replied noting that the transaction agreements contemplate that Time Warner and Comcast might not go forward with the Redemption Agreement (i.e., transfer of the system serving the Member Cities) if the Adelphia transaction does not take place. While both Time Warner and Comcast can waive this condition precedent to the Transaction it is also possible that if the Adelphia transaction does not occur the proposed transfer of the system from Time Warner to Comcast may not result. We recommend that any approval of the Transaction should be contingent upon the .provision of certificates of authority provided by the Office of the Secretary of State verifying that Cable Holdco II, Inc. is duly qualified to transact business in the State of Minnesota. So'long as that condition is included in any proposed resolution we believe it would be unreasonable for the Member Cities to find that upon closing of the Transaction the proposed transferee, MOC Holdco II, Inc. and proposed franchisee, Cable Holdco 11, Inc. will not be legally qualified to own and operate the system. 7981480 12 THE TRANSACTION Time Warner Cable assigns franchise to subsidiary. Comcast subsidiary MOC Holdco II, Inc., acquires all of the stock of Time Warner Cable subsidiary. *MOC Holdco II, Inc. is a Delaware corporation, wholly -owned by Comcast of Georgia, Inc., a Colorado corporation, which in turn is wholly -owned by Comcast MO Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, which in turn is wholly -owned by Comcast Cable Communications Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation which in turn is wholly -owned by Comcast Corporation, a publicly traded Pennsylvania corporation. 7981480 13 Comcast Corporation Intermediate Entities" MOC Holdco II, Inc. Cable Holdco II, Inc. (Franchisee) *MOC Holdco II, Inc. is a Delaware corporation, wholly -owned by Comcast of Georgia, Inc., a Colorado corporation, which in turn is wholly -owned by Comcast MO Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, which in turn is wholly -owned by Comcast Cable Communications Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation which in turn is wholly -owned by Comcast Corporation, a publicly traded Pennsylvania corporation. 7981480 14 Section 5. Technical Qualifications The technical qualification standard relates to Comcast's technical expertise and experience in operating and maintaining cable television systems. In such a review, the standard is once again that the Member Cities consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. The proposed transferee, MOC Holdco Il, Inc., is ultimately wholly -owned by Comcast Corporation, a publicly traded Pennsylvania corporation. Comcast Corporation is the nations largest cable television operator with over 21.5 million cable customers in 35 states. Comcast also controls a variety of cable networks with investments that include E Entertainment Television, Style Network, The Golf Channel, Outdoor Life Network, G4, AZN Television, TV 1 and several Comcast sport networks. Comcast also holds a majority interest in Comcast - Spectacor, whose major holdings include the Philadelphia Flyers NHL hockey team, Philadelphia 76ers NBA basketball team as well as two multi- purpose arenas in Philadelphia. Comcast is also the cable operator in a number of Minnesota jurisdictions, including the cities of Eagan, Burnsville, Inver Grove Heights, South St. Paul, St. Paul, Woodbury, Roseville, Maple Grove, Golden Valley, and others. In all, Comcast presently serves over 75 separate jurisdictions in'the State of Minnesota as a result of Its acquisition of the systems formally held by AT&T Broadband. The Commission asked numerous questions of Comcast regarding its proposed integration of the Time Warner systems, including any proposed changes in system operation, programming line -up, billing system and customer service. In response to virtually all of these questions Comcast replied that "there are no current plans to make any changes in the system and no such changes are required as a direct result of the transaction. However, Comcast reserves the right to consider and make such changes as customer and company needs dictate." Comcast argues that due to limitations under federal law upon operations integration prior to antitrust review and approval, Comcast cannot perform any local level analysis required to answer the Commission's questions. Comcast commits that it will evaluate the operations of the cable system serving the Member Cities after the close of the transaction and make decisions as appropriate to support the products and services provided to its customers. Given the vague replies provided by Comcast it is impossible for the Commission to determine precisely how Comcast will attempt to integrate Time Wamer's systems and operations. Comcast has simply committed that it will honor all existing franchise obligations including those related to public, educational and governmental programming, including maintenance of the local studio in Eden Prairie. 7981480 15. II Despite the vague replies provided by Comcast there is no evidence that Comcast does not possess the requisite technical qualifications, experience and expertise to own and operate the systems serving the Member Cities. Based on the foregoing, we conclude it would be unreasonable for the Member Cities to `find that, upon closing of the proposed transaction, MOC Holdco, Inc. (the proposed transferee) and Cable Holdco II, Inc., (the proposed franchisee) will not be technically qualified to own and operate the system. 798148VI 16 I. SCOPE OF REVIEW We have reviewed selected financial information, provided by Comcast Corporation ( "Comcasf) in conjunction with Time Warner Cable's request to transfer the cable television systems (the "Systems ") serving the Member Cities as well as those that are presently operated by Adelphia Communications Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and its affiliates or Time Warner Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its affiliates (collectively, the "Transferors "). The selected financial information, which was provided or obtained and to which our review has been limited, consists solely of the following financial information (hereinafter referred to collectively as the "Financial Statements"): 798148v1 (a) Consolidated balance sheet of Comcast and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, together with the footnotes and additional information, as the same were published in Comcast's Form 10 -K for the year ended December 31, 2004, and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 25, 2005. (b) Consolidated balance sheet of Comcast and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, together with the footnotes and additional information, as the same were published in Comcast's Form 10 -Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 5, 2005.., (c) Comcast's Form 8 -K "Report of Unscheduled Material Events or Corporate Changes" filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 26, 2005. (d) Financial information provide by Comcast with Form 394 and in response to our questionnaire provided by letter dated July 25, 2005. (e) Asset Purchase Agreement by and between Adelphia Communications Corporation and Comcast dated April 20, 2005.. (f) Redemption Agreement dated as of April 20, 2005 by and among Comcast Cable Communications Holdings, Inc.; MOC Holdco 1, LLC; TWE Holdings I Trust;. Cable Holdco III LLC; Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P. and other related parties.. 17 } (g) Redemption Agreement dated as of April 20, 2005 by and among Comcast Cable Communications Holdings, Inc.; MOC Holdco II Inc.; TWE Holdings I Trust; TWE Holdings 11 Trust; Cable Holdco 11 Inc.; Time Warner Cable Inc. and other related parties. (h) Exchange Agreement dated as of April 20, 2005 by and among Comcast Corporation; Time Warner Cable Inc.; Time Warner NY Cable LLC and other related parties. (i) Financial information as found on Comcast's website located at www.cmcsk.com. (j) Comcast's Investor Presentation —"Announcement of the Adelphia and Time Warner Transactions" - dated April 21, 2005. Comcast, in response to the Commission's transfer questionnaire dated July 14, 2005, stated that "Since Comcast will not have a full opportunity to review the operations, financial results or other relevant parameters of the system to be acquired until well after the Transaction has closed, it would be premature to produce meaningful pro forma financial information relating to the future financial performance of the Transferee at this time. "12 Since Comcast claims to not have fully reviewed the financial aspects of the Transactions as discussed in Section II below, Comcast has not provided us with information regarding certain financial forecasts, financial projections, potential cost savings, and synergies of the.Transactions. As such, our - review of the financial information with respect to Comcast does not include any analysis with respect to projected financial information, except as otherwise noted in this report. Our procedure was limited to providing a summary of our analysis of the Financial Statements and additional financial information to facilitate the Member Cities' assessment of the financial capabilities of Comcast to become the successor operator of the Systems serving the Member Cities currently operated by the Transferors. II. OVERVIEW OF TRANSACTION Comcast Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation ( "Comcast"), entered into a series of transactions which provide for the following: (1) the purchase by. Comcast of certain assets and the assumption of certain liabilities from Adelphia Communications Corporation, a Delaware corporation, ( "Adelphia "); (2) the redemption of Comcast's and its affiliates' interests in Time Warner Entertainment Company,. L.P., a Delaware limited partnership ( "TWE "), and Time Warner Cable Inc., a Delaware corporation ( "TWC "); and (3) the exchange by Comcast and its affiliates with TWC and its affiliates of certain of its assets and liabilities.13 These transactions provide for an expansion and restructuring of the cable systems owned and operated by Comcast as well as 12 Letter from Sheila R. Willard, Senior Vice President of Government Affairs, dated July 25, 2005 to Brian T. Grogan, Esq. Moss & Barnett, P.A. (the "Willard Letter') at p. 7. 13 Comcast Corporation's Form 8 -K, "Report of Unscheduled Material Events and Corporate Changes" filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 26, 2005 ("Form 8 -IC') at Item 1.01. 798148v1 18 divestment of its TWE and TWC investments. The closings on these transactions are subject to various regulatory approvals and the approval of the bankruptcy court having jurisdiction over the Adelphia bankruptcy and are expected to occur in the first or second calendar quarter of 2006.14 The. Comcast acquisition of the Adelphia assets and liabilities under the Asset Purchase Agreement by and between Comcast and Adelphia dated April 20, 2005 (the °Adelphia /Comcast Purchase Agreement°) will be effected under a plan under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.15 The transaction provides for the purchase of Adelphia's interests in certain controlled entities, which include approximately 1,092,000 subscribers, and cable systems servicing approximately 138,000 subscribers for a purchase price of $3.5 billion dollars.16 The Adelphia/Comcast Purchase Agreement includes provisions and conditions customary for a transaction of this size including a termination fee payable by Adelphia to Comcast of $87.5 million if the transaction is not consummated.' The redemption of the TWE interests held by TWE Holdings I Trust, a Delaware statutory trust and an affiliate of Comcast, will be effectuated by the transfer of all of the membership interests of Cable Holdco III LLC, a newly formed Delaware limited liability company and subsidiary of TWE, to a Comcast affiliate. Cable Holdco III LLC will hold, at the time of the redemption, cable systems with approximately 159,000-basic subscribers and approximately $133 million in cash. 8 The redemption of the TWC shares held by TWE Holdings II Trust, a Delaware statutory trust and an affiliate of Comcast, will be effectuated by the transfer of all of the stock of Cable Holdco II Inc., a newly formed Delaware corporation and subsidiary of TWC, to a Comcast affiliate. Cable Holdco II Inc. will hold, at the time of the redemption, cable systems with approximately 550,000 basic subscribers and approximately $1.9 billion in cash.19 The exchange of assets between Comcast and its affiliates and TWC and its affiliates will be effectuated by a like -kind exchange transaction governed by Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and will provide for a tax -free exchange of certain cable systems between Comcast and its affiliates and TWC and its affiliates 20 TWC and its affiliates will transfer approximately 2,031,000 basic subscribers located primarily in the West Palm Beach, Florida, the suburbs of the District of Columbia- and Minneapolis, Minnesota to Comcast in exchange for approximately 2,203,000 basic '.4 Comcast Corporation's Form 104 for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 5, 2005 ("Form 10-Q °) at p. 25. 15 Form 8-K at Item 1.01. 16 Id. '7 Asset Purchase Agreement by and between Comcast Corporation and Adelphia Communications Corporation dated April 20, 2005, specifically referencing Section 8.5(b). 'B Form 8-K at Item 1.01. 1e Id 2° Exchange Agreement dated as of April 20, 2005 by and among Comcast Corporation, Time Warner Cable, Inc., Time Warner NY Cable LLC and other affiliated parties specifically referencing Recital H. 7981480 19 r, subscribers located primarily in Los Angeles, California; Dallas, Texas; Cleveland, Ohio; and in the western section of New York. The net result of the above transactions are that Comcast and its affiliated entities will acquire approximately 1.8 million basic subscribers for net cash of approximately $1.5 billion and the redemption of Comcast's 4.7% interest in TWE and 17.9% interest in TWC 22 After all of the above transactions are completed, Comcast will continue to be the largest cable provider in the United States and service approximately 23.3 million basic subscribers23 Ill. OVERVIEW OF COMCAST (a) Summary of the Company. Comcast Corporation was organized in 2001 and is in the business of development, management and 0 eration of broadband communication networks in the United States? Its predecessors have developed, managed and operated broadband cable networks since 1963. Comcast is the largest cable operator in the United States and currently provides service to approximately 21.5 million subscribers in the United States as of December 31, 2004. Comcast also provides programming content,. including El Entertainment Television, the Style Network, the Golf Channel, the Outdoor Life Network and the Comcast sports networks.27 Comcast currently employs approximately 74,000 individuals, with approximately eighty percent (80 %) of the, individuals working within the cable communications area. 8 (b) Management and Operations. Mr. Brian L. Roberts is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Comcast and controls the corporation. 9 Mr. Roberts has the sole voting power over approximately 33 1/3% of the combined voting power of the two classes of voting stock of Comcast.so (c) Acquisitions. In November 2002; Comcast completed the acquisition of AT&T Corp.'s broadband business which included approximately 13.6 million basic subscribers and was valued at approximately $50.66 billion. 31 The result of this acquisition was to triple the size of Comcast. Prior to the 2' Form 8 -K at Item 1.01. 22 Form 10-0 at p. 25. 23 Id. 24Comcast Corporation's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 25, 2005 ( "Form 1040) at p. 2. '" Id. at p. 40. 28 Id. at p. 3. 27 Id. at p. 40. 28 Id. at p. 13. 29 Id. at p. 14. 30 Id. at p. 17. 31 AT &T Corp.'s Form 10 -K for the year ended December 31, 2001, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 1, 2002 ( "AT &T Form 10 -K "), at p. 1; AT &T Comcast Corporate Investor presentation dated December 20; 2001, at p..8; and Form 10 -K at p. 48. 7981480 20 z. AT &T Corp. broadband acquisition, Comcast had made numerous acquisitions, including from AT &T Corp. and Adelphia.32 (d) Competitive Environment. The financial performance of cable system operations are subject to a variety of factors in an ever increasing competitive environment with increasing diverse means of product delivery including competition from many different sources, including direct broadcast satellite services (such as EchoStar and DirecTV), local exchange carriers, other wireline communications, program distribution, satellite master antenna systems, local television,. online computer services, newspapers, magazines, book stores, movie theatres, live events and home video products.33 Additionally, regulatory agencies may limit Comcast's ability to compete or allow other operators to compete in Comcast's markets.34 The competitive environment also extends to the advertising market as old and new advertising outlets provide additional sources of competition as (e) Financing. As is the case for all cable providers, capital is vital for the constant maintenance, system upgrades and operations of its cable system. In January 2004, Comcast refinanced a $4.5 billion revolving bank credit facility which expires in January of 2009.36 Comcast has traditionally maintained substantial lines of credit to meet any short-term .borrowing obligations and liquidity requirements. Comcast stated in its response to our inquiry that Comcast has available bank lines of credit and access to other capital markets for the $1.5 billion needed to complete the Transactions as discussed in Section II hereof. 37 Comcast also stated that it expects, according to a public comment by John Alchin, an Executive Vice - President and Co -Chief Financial Officer of Comcast, to invest approximately-$150 million of capital into the Adelphia systems in the next two years. IV. FINDINGS (a) Analysis of Comcast's Financial Statements. Neither federal law nor FCC regulations provide franchising authorities with any guidance concerning the evaluation of the financial qualifications of a transfer applicant for a cable franchise 39 In certain circumstances, it is appropriate to consider 32 Form 1 O-K at p. 3. . 33 Id. at pp. 5-6. 34 Id. at pp. 8-13. 3r' Id. at p. 8. 30 Id. at p. 29. 37 Willard Letter at p. 7. 38 Id. at p. 7. 39 FCC Form 394 does reference whether the proposed transferee "has sufficient liquid assets on hand or available from committed resources to consummate the transaction and operate the facilities for three months." This reference, however, does not necessarily constitute the definitive standard for financial qualifications. 7981480 . 21 the performance of an applicant based upon the applicant's historical performance. Given the fact that Comcast and its subsidiaries have a history of cable system operations and such acquisitions as detailed in Section II hereof will account for a less than ten percent (10 %) increase in Comcast's cable subscriber base, such statistical information and analysis is relevant with respect to the Transactions contemplated by the agreements discussed in Section II hereof. We have provided general financial data relevant to the operation of a public company and as used by financial analysts evaluating public companies. Due to the size and scope of Comcast's operations, a comparison of its financial data with other competitors provides only minimal insight into the financial capabilities of Comcast. Based upon the selected financial information, which we reviewed, the following is a summary of various financial factors from operations for the twelve -month period ended December 31, 2004 and the three -month period ended March 31, 2005 and balance sheet dates of December 31, 2004 and March 31, 2005. (1) Ratios determined as of March 31, 2005. • Data based upon Financial Information in Comcast's 2004 Form 10-K and 2005 First Quarter Form 10-Q. (b) Specific Financial Statement Data and Analysis. Assets. According to Comcasfs financial information, Comcast had (1) current assets of $3,535 million and $2,930 million; (ii) working capital of a negative $5,100 million and a negative $5,866 million; and (iii) total assets of $104,694 million and $104,238 million as of December 31, 2004 and March 31, 2005, respectively.40 Working capital, which is the excess of current assets over current liabilities, is a short-term analytical tool used to assess the ability of a particular entity to meet its current financial obligations in the ordinary course of business. The negative working capital balance of $5,866 million as of March 31, 2005, suggests that Comcast may experience a short-term deficiency in available working capital resources that will be needed to pay Transaction costs and debt 40 Form 10-K at p. 36 and Form 10 -Q at p. 2. 7981480 22 l5. EBITDA/revenue•. Cash flow percentage 40.9% 35.4 %(1) 6. Operating Income Percentage' (Operating Income /Revenue 14.3% 16.1 %(1) 7. Debt/Equity Ratio` (long-term debt/total equity) .49:1 .47:1(1) 8. Current Ratio• current assets /current liabilities .41:1 .33:1(1) (1) Ratios determined as of March 31, 2005. • Data based upon Financial Information in Comcast's 2004 Form 10-K and 2005 First Quarter Form 10-Q. (b) Specific Financial Statement Data and Analysis. Assets. According to Comcasfs financial information, Comcast had (1) current assets of $3,535 million and $2,930 million; (ii) working capital of a negative $5,100 million and a negative $5,866 million; and (iii) total assets of $104,694 million and $104,238 million as of December 31, 2004 and March 31, 2005, respectively.40 Working capital, which is the excess of current assets over current liabilities, is a short-term analytical tool used to assess the ability of a particular entity to meet its current financial obligations in the ordinary course of business. The negative working capital balance of $5,866 million as of March 31, 2005, suggests that Comcast may experience a short-term deficiency in available working capital resources that will be needed to pay Transaction costs and debt 40 Form 10-K at p. 36 and Form 10 -Q at p. 2. 7981480 22 service in the next year. This will be overcome, according to Comcast, by drawing on other capital resources including additional borrowings from its revolving bank credit facility as'described herein and operating cash flows.41 Comcast's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) as of December 31, 2004 of .41:1 is significantly below a typical investor standard of 1.0:1, which means that Comcast will be required to find other sources of funds (other than current assets) to pay is current liabilities. Liabilities: According to Comcast's financial information, Comcast had (i) current liabilities of $8,635 million and $ 8,796 million; (ii) long -term debt net of current maturities of $20,093 million and $19,317 million; and (iii) equity of $41;422 million and $41,356 million as of December 31, 2004 and March 31, 2005, respectively 42 As of December 31, 2004, Comcast's debt to equity ratio, which is, a measure of the amount of debt in relation to total equity, was approximately..49:1. Generally, a low debt to equity ratio is considered, favorable. Comcast's, debt to equity ratio is favorable as the amount of Comcast's equity is almost two times its debt: This favorable ratio is largely the result of Comcast' Vrevious acquisition of AT &T Corp.'s broadband business in 2002. Income and Expense. According to. Comcast's financial information, Comcast had: (i) revenue of $20,307 million and $5,363 million; (ii) operating expenses of $17,399 million and $4,497 million; and (iii) net income of $970 million and $143 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 and the quarter ended March 31, 2005, respectively.44 Comcast had an operating cash flow percentage for the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 of 40.9 %, and the author notes that this ratio has improved significantly from the 2000 and 2001 combined AT &T Comcast Corporation ratios which were approximately 23% - 24%.45 This is a positive indication of the financial health, of Comcast. Cash flow and the cash flow percentage provide a measure of the ability of a business entity to generate cash. (c) Comcast Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Results. The following information is a summary of some of Comcast's pertinent financial data and Comcast management's discussion regarding this data. 41 Willard Letter at p. 7. 42 Form 10 -K at p. 36 and Form 10 -0 at p. 2. 48 Form 10-K at p. 48. 44 Form 10 -K at p. 37 and Form 10 -Q at p. 3. 45 AT &T Comcast Corporation Form S-4 for the year ending December 31, 2001, filed February 11, 2002 with the Securities and Exchange Commission at pp. 111 4-8. and AT &T Comcast Corporation, Form S-4 Amendment No. 1 filed April 10, 2002 with the Securities and Exchange Commission at pp. 1.11 4-7. 7981480 23 Revenue. The financial guidance issued by Comcast in 2005 projects a 10% increase in gross revenues in 2005 and a 14 %A5% increase in operating cash flow in 2005.48 The creation of a larger subscriber base through the acquisition and redemption Transactions by Comcast should allow for the deployment of a greater range of services and products which could have a positive impact on Comcast's gross revenues. Expenses. In 2004, programming expenses, which are fees paid to receive programming from cable networks for distribution to video subscribers and is Comcast largest single expense, increased by 6.1 % from 2003. Comcast's management believes these expense increases can be mitigated by additional volume discounts 48 The AT &T Corp. /Comcast transaction in 2002 resulted in the recording of $1.5 billion of employee termination costs and exit activities which were accrued .49 As of December 31, 2004, only $75 million of this liability remains unpaid. 50 These expenses resulted in a significant use of cash flow by Comcast over the last 2 years. Capital Expenditures /Non - Operating Cash Flow. In 2005, Comcast is projecting to invest approximately $3.2 — $3.3 billion in improvements to its systems 1, which is a decrease from the $3.66 billion spent on capital improvements in 2004 s2 Management. expects Comcast will spend approximately $150 million on capital improvements related to the acquired Adelphia systems in 2006 and 2007.53 Comcast does not intend to pay dividends in the foreseeable future, but has repurchased approximately $1.3 billion of its stock from its stockholders in the last year.54 The stock repurchase plan has required the use of a significant portion of Comcast's cash flow in the last year and an additional approximately $600 million has been reserved for additional stock repurchases in 2005. 55 Long Term Contracts /Investments. Comcast is subject to long -term contracts for video programming, audio programming, electronic program 48 As found on the Comcast website at www.cmcsk.com under Stock Information, Financial Highlights, Financial Guidance. 47 Form 10-K at p. 24. 48 Form 10-Q at p. 7. 4e Id. So Id. 51 As found on the Comcast website at www.cmcsk.com under Stock Information, Financial Highlights, Financial Guidance. 52 Form 10 -K at p. 68. 53 Willard Letter at p. 7. Sa Form 1 o -K at p. 18. 55 Id. 798148VI 24 guides and other services. The future guaranteed fixed costs of these contracts and agreements are approximately $7.2 billion.57 Comcast is liable for fifty percent (50 %) of the liabilities associated with AT &T Corp.'s interest in At Home Corporation. At Home Corporation filed bankruptcy in September of 2001, which was followed by multiple secondary lawsuits.69 A settlement was reached with respect to a portion of this liability and Comcast has accrued $170 million in the first quarter of 2005. fi0 The financial impact of the complete disposition of these lawsuits is not evaluated in this report. Financing. Comcast will have significant debt obligations in excess of $24.672 billion as of the date of the Transaction 61 Comcast also noted that it has $3.839 billion of funds immediately available under its credit facilities as of March 31, 2005 which will allow Comcast to continue to offset its negative current working capital in the short term. 62 Comcast also has cash, cash equivalents and short term investments of $636 million as of March 31, 2005. Thus, based upon the financial information supplied by the management of Comcast and Comcast's history of expanding services and revenues of newly acquired systems,64 Comcast should have sufficient liquid assets for short-term operations and capital expenditures, from operations and available financing through the initial period after the Transactions. V. FINANCIAL QUALIFICATIONS SUMMARY Based upon the foregoing and limited strictly to the Financial Statements reviewed by Moss & Barnett in conducting this review, we believe it would be unreasonable for the Member Cities to find that Comcast does not possess sufficient financial qualifications subject to limitations set forth below. In the event the Member Cities elect -to proceed with approving the assignment of the franchise, the assessment of Comcast's financial qualification should not be construed in any way to constitute an opinion as to the financial capability or stability of Comcast to (i) operate its existing franchise operation; (ii) to operate the Systems; or (iii) successfully consummate the Transactions contemplated by the various agreements as discussed in Section II hereof or future acquisitions upon which we express no opinion. This efficiency of the procedures used in.making an assessment of Comcast's,financial 6' Id. at p. 31. 67 Id. 59 Form 10-0 at p. 14. S9 Id at pp. 13 -15. 60 Id. 81 Willard Letter at p. 7. 62 Form 10-0 at p. 9. 63 Id at p. 2. 84 Comcast Investor Presentation dated April 21, 2005. 798148v1 25 qualifications and its capability to become the successor operator of the Systems is solely the responsibility of each Member City. Consequently, we make no 4 representation regarding this efficiency of the, procedures used either for the purpose for i which this analysis of financial capability and qualifications was requested or for any other purpose. 798148v1 26 Based specifically on the foregoing information and analysis, we believe it would be unreasonable for the Member Cities to find that upon closing of the Transaction the proposed transferee, MOC Holdco II, Inc. as well as the proposed Franchisee (Cable Holdco II, Inc.) will not be legally and technically qualified to own and operate the cable system. With respect to the financial qualifications review, the reader is referred to the financial qualifications summary set forth on page 25 herein. Based on the foregoing, we recommend that the Member Cities review this report, listen to any additional public comment or information, as necessary or appropriate, and undertake all necessary action to pass and adopt a resolution in form and content similar to the document attached hereto as Exhibit A. 798148v1 27 Exhibit B City-of Edina, Minnesota Resolution — Approving Transfer 798148v1 . B -1 City of Edina, Minnesota Resolution No. Approving the Proposed Change of Control of Time Warner RECITALS: 1. On or about January 1, 1997, the City of Edina, Minnesota ( "City ") passed and adopted Ordinance No. 1996 -5, granting a Cable Television Franchise ("Franchise "), currently held by Time Warner Cable Inc. ( "Franchisee "). 2. On or about June 14, 2005, Franchisee submitted to the City FCC Form 394, Application for Franchise Authority Consent to Assignment or Transfer of Control of Cable Television Franchise ("Form 394 ") 3. Form 394 constitutes Franchisee's application to transfer the system to MOC Holdco II, Inc. which will wholly own Cable Holdco-11 Inc. ("Proposed Franchisee"). 4. Pursuant to a Redemption Agreement, dated April 20, 2005, by and among Comcast Cable Communications Holdings, Inc.; MOC Holdco II, Inc.; TWE Holdings Trust, TWE Holdings II Trust; Cable Holdco II Inc., Time Warner Cable Inc. and other related parties: (a) the Franchisee cable system and Franchise will be assigned to a wholly -owned subsidiary of Franchisee, Cable Holdco II Inc. and (b) immediately 'thereafter, pursuant to the same Redemption Agreement, all of the stock of Cable Holdco II Inc. will be acquired by MOC Holdco II, Inc., an -indirect wholly -owned subsidiary of Comcast Cable Communications Holdings, Inc. The assignment and .change of control described herein shall collectively be referred to as the "Transaction." 5. Under the City's Cable Television Regulatory Ordinance ( "Cable Ordinance ") and applicable law, the Transaction requires consent from the City. 798148v1 6. The City is a member of the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission which has conducted a review of the Transaction and issued a recommendation that the City approve the Transaction subject to the conditions contained herein. 7. The City has reviewed the Transaction and the legal, technical, and financial qualifications of MOC Holdco II, Inc. and its corporate parent entities. 8. Based on information obtained and on the reports and information received by City, including the recommendation of the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission, the :City has elected to consent to the Transaction. NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Edina, Minnesota hereby resolves as follows: 4. The Franchise is in full force and effect, and Franchisee is the lawful holder of the Franchise. 5. Each of the foregoing- recitals are hereby incorporated, by reference. 6. The City hereby consents and approves of the Transaction as contemplated under the Redemption Agreement, subject to: e. Closing of the Transaction described in information provided to the City by Franchisee and MOC Holdco II, Inc. f. MOC Holdco II, Inc., within thirty (30) days of the date of closing, notifying the City in writing of the completion of the Transaction. g. Cable Holdco Il Inc., within thirty (30) days of the date of closing, providing the City with a signed acceptance of this Resolution in the form attached hereto and incorporated by reference. h. The Franchisee or MOC Holdco 11, Inc., within thirty (30) days of the date of adoption of this Resolution, reimbursing the City for all costs, expenses and 798148A 2 professional fees incurred by the City related to the City's review and consent of the Transaction, including costs, expenses and professional fees incurred by the City due to the. City's participation in the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission. 4. The City hereby waives any right of first refusal which the City may have to purchase the Franchise, or the cable television system serving the City, but only as such right of first refusal applies to the request for approval of the Transaction now before the City. 7. By this consent the City does not make any representation that Franchisee is in compliance with its obligations under the Franchise. 8. By this consent the City does not waive any of Franchisee's commitments, duties and obligations under the Franchise, including any accrued and unfulfilled obligation of the Franchisee, whether known or unknown, relating to the Franchise. 9. In the event the Transaction contemplated under the Redemption Agreement is not completed, for any reason, or is modified in any material manner, the City's consent provided hereunder shall not be effective. This Resolution shall take effect and continue and remain in effect from and after the date of its passage, approval, and adoption. A motion to approve the foregoing Resolution No. was made by City Council Member and duly seconded by City Council Member 798148VI 3 The following City Council Members voted in the affirmative: The following City Council Members voted in the negative: Passed and adopted by the City Council for the City of Edina, Minnesota this day of 12005. ATTEST: By: 798148VI 4 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By: Its: ACCEPTANCE AND AGREEMENT Cable Holdco II Inc., hereby accepts this Resolution No. ( "Resolution ") and .agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions 'of this Resolution and the lawful terms and conditions of the Franchise referenced within the Resolution. Dated this _ day of , 20_ CABLE HOLDCO II INC. By: Its: STATE OF ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 200_, by , the of Cable Holdco II Inc. SEAL Notary Public 798148VI 5 9705 Data Park Minnetonka, MN 55343 r. ,TIME WARNER CABLE August 26, 2005 Mr. Brian Grogan MOSS & BARNETT 4800 Wells Fargo Center 90 South Seventh Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Dear Brian: Thank you for your letter of August 22, 2005 regarding playback of Edina City Council Meetings on Edina Channel 16. As you may know, over the past several months I have been working with the City's Communication Director Jennifer Bennerotte, City video purchasing consultant Richard Jamieson and my staff, including Michelle Glynn and our technicians to improve the look of the channel. Michelle and I have made recommendations to the City on steps it could take to improve the look of these meetings previous to this. Significant progress has been made in addressing the concerns raised in your letter, with most issues resolved a month or more ago. Unfortunately; it may appear that these issues have not been resolved due to the temporary but significant failure of our playback system two weeks ago following its disassembly and move within our Eden Prairie offices. Let me first address the concerns raised in your letter to bring you up to date on progress made before our recent setback. I will then briefly describe our system malfunction and how we are recovering, and suggest steps we can take to further improve playback for the City of Edina.. As I noted above, most of the concerns raised in your letter have been resolved. 1) The most important improvement, as identified by Richard Jamieson and my own observation as an Edina resident, was accomplished through the lowering of lighting levels on the Council by the recently -hired City video staff. According to Mr. Jamieson and Ms. Bennerotte, this has greatly improved the over - exposed or washed -out look. Ms. Bennerotte did not identify any other concerns at that time. I spoke to Eric Anderson about my communication with Mr. Jamieson and asked what he was hearing about the Council Meetings contrast issues, and while supportive of our efforts, he reported receiving no complaints. Mr. Brian Grogan August 26, 2005' Page 2 Although improved, I have personally observed that image issues remain and are visible in the live signal aired on the High- Definition monitors in the Council . Chambers. Light skin tones, the large off -white surfaces and light- colored clothing lose their features, and this loss of contrast is made more prominent by the extraordinary detail seen throughout the rest of the picture. I attribute this to the use of wide - format High - Definition cameras or an adjustment of the same. The inevitable processing of the signal by sending it through the cable system only exaggerates these source material flaws. My , point in, noting this is to suggest that further evaluation and�adjustments maybe in order.:: 2) After the over - exposure was resolved to Mr. Jamieson's satisfaction, he: said, that he had observed audio out of sync We investigated this immediatelybut could not duplicate the problem or observe it in the Edina signal:, It maybe associated, . with a specific deck and/or wiring.. We continue to monitor for,this problem and have not experienced it with the.playback of other` Southwest City meetings Important for our tracking this down (and. tracking any problem) is' . contemporaneous reporting. To that end, I encourage the Council and City staff to call me on my cell phone at 612 - fa 730 -4312 to facilitate the immediate reporting of problems. 3) The issue with the meeting's end missing and replaced by black`was resolved more than three months ago with the discovery of an operator, training issue in the encoding of meetings over four hours in length. As to the length I of tapes, this =is the same request we make of other Southwest Cities. It corresponds to the length of a standard professional S -VHS cassette which we have traditionally played back — the format the City is currently providing to us. Your concerns about segmenting are appreciated and we will be happy to explore options for the delivery of programming to us that could include providing programming on DVD (MPEG2) and emailing video files. 4) To our recollection, we have never received feedback about ghosting. We have not observed it in the Edina signal. It may be traceable to the TV or home where viewed, in which case a service call may be in order. To track this down, a contemporaneous report or more information will be most helpful. Two weeks ago we experienced a significant failure of our playback system while we were moving it to a new location within our Eden Prairie offices. The move was part of a series of improvements being made to our Headend, and was intended to give our Public Affairs staff more control over playback and quality assurance. The results are clearly not what we intended. Instead of a planned interruption of Southwest programming Mr. Brian Grogan. August 26, 2005 Page 3 scheduled when it would be least disruptive, computer card failures and rewiring issues resulted in the unplanned delay in resuming regular programming as well as delays in encoding new programs and programs playing back improperly. While the system is returning to normal, the City of Edina and all of our client programmers experienced a spike in problems. Our playback schedule is still experiencing interruptions as we push to restore normal operations. We also apologize for the appearance of the current Council Meeting. We have been encoding with back -up resources, and the 7 -hour meeting will be re- encoded as soon as. possible, to improve its appearance. If our communication to Ms. Bennerotte about these problems,has not made this point clear, let me state here that we deeply regret the,difficultes this has presented Despite the flurry of problems these past two Veeks, as noted above, we have made good progress on the issues noted in your letter In most if not all cases, the reported failure has not been repeated; although the recent system failure may lead one to the conclusion . that the :Sam'e problems remain With regard to improving the appearance of Edina programming, we have long recommended that the City match' the digital output of its High- Definition cameras by mastering in digital rather than: S -VHS. We will be happyto loan the City, a digital recorder to facilitate digital - -to- digital mastering for our playback system. If this shows %.,. . improvement on-air, the City might consider, submitting programming in digital. As.. another option, we could see if fewer artifacts appear by having the City send us VHS tapes instead of S -VHS (S -VHS decks can also record in VHS). This eliminates a step`in the conversion of digital video to component video to composite video. Given the extraordinary amount of information available from the source cameras. VHS should look comparable to S -VHS. In recognition of what appears 'to be a gulf in the perception of the type and degree of problems with the presentation of City programming, I propose that we set up a time convenient to preview the actual playback of City programming on the system for mutual review at City Hall so that we can exchange comments about what we see, come to a common understanding of what we see, and explore options for improvements by both parties from a common point of view. Michelle and I will be happy to join Jennifer and/or one or more of her video staff at this meeting. I know Richard Jamieson is eager to get involved. I am willing to do this after each Council Meeting and before the first airing. In addition, we are performing other experiments here to try to identify how the City of Edina tapes are different or play differently on the system than comparable tapes received from other Southwest Cities. Once again, we extend our apologies for the problems we have had with our playback system move. We don't want this to be mistaken for an ongoing unwillingness or r ' Mr. Brian Grogan, August 26, 2005 , Page 4 inability to provide the City with high- quality playback. We look forward to working with the City of Edina now and into the future. I look forward to your comments about my observations and ideas, and encourage you to contact me immediately on my cell phone about.any issues with playback at 612 -730- 4312. Thank you. Sincerely, Memo To: City Manager Gordon Hughes From: Communications Director Jennifer Bennerotte Cc: Cable Production Assistants Date: August 31, 2005 Re: Time Warner Cable Thank you for sharing with me the memorandums sent from Brian Grogan of Moss and Barnett and Lance Leupold of Time Warner Cable regarding the City of Edina's ongoing difficulties in achieving quality playback of our programming on Edina Community Channel 16 (EDINA 16). Both our system designer, Richard Jamieson of Jamieson & Associates, and I have reported playback problems since we began airing meetings of the Edina City Council in May 2004. Improvements have been made, but none to my complete satisfaction. Lighting According to Mr. Leupold's memo, he and his staff at Time Warner Cable believe that our new staff lowered the lighting levels in the Council Chambers, improving the over - exposed or washed out look some viewers have reported. The lighting levels have NOT been adjusted. My crew properly color balances the cameras before each meeting (a service the City of Bloomington did not provide for us when they were taping meetings). That has helped with playback, but not resolved the issues. Audio On a handful of occasions, viewers have reported the audio out of sync. On other occasions, audio has not played at all. These issues also stem from Time Warner Cable's encoding process. Whenever an audio problem has been reported, Time Warner has resolved the matter before the next broadcast of a meeting. However, in my opinion, these problems should be identified and resolved before the first broadcast. Improperly encoded tapes should not be aired. Time Warner technicians should double -check to make sure encoding has been successful (on all tapes) before a meeting is aired. Segmenting In his memo, Mr. Leupold said he would be happy to explore options for the delivery of programming to Time Warner Cable. Since we currently record to DVD, I would really appreciate it if Time Warner could seriously consider receiving that type of media. With one DVD instead of multiple tapes, all segmenting problems should be resolved. Summary Time Warner Cable Access Administrator Michelle Glynn suggested to me that their lower -end equipment might have difficulty encoding our media, captured with high -end, wide - format high - definition cameras. I agree with Mr. Leupold that further evaluation and adjustments are in order. In his memo, Mr. Leupold offered to loan the City of Edina a digital recorder to facilitate digital -to- digital mastering for its playback system. I think we should take him up on that offer to see if that makes a difference in the quality of playback. As things are now, if you played a tape of one of meetings next to a Time Warner broadcast of the same meeting, I have no doubt that you would see a difference in quality. In fact, Mr. Leupold has suggested that sort of demonstration. Those in attendance should be Mr. Leupold, Ms. Glynn, me, at least one of our cable production assistants and perhaps a representative of Alpha Video (our system engineer). There is not a need for Mr. Jamieson to be present. In summary, I believe the following should be complete before the transfer of the franchise is approved by the City: • Time Warner Cable to consider receipt of DVD or MPEG2 instead of SVHS • Time Warner Cable to loan City digital recorder (and its use evaluated thereafter) • Time Warner Cable and City to review a tape together before broadcast, identify and resolve issues before playback If you have any questions, please contact me. Thank you. • Page 2 at e �t� �0 REPORURECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item W.B. From:. Mike Siitari, Police Chief '. Consent v Information Only ❑ Date: September 1, 2005 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Safe & Sober Grant Resolution ❑ Motion o Resolution ❑ Ordinance o _ ❑ Discussion RECOMMENDATION: Approve Resolution NO. 2005.80 authorizing execution of the grant agreement between the Minnesota Department of Public Safety and the Edina Police Department for funding of overtime traffic enforcement efforts and equipment. INFO/BACKGROUND: The Minnesota Department of Public Safety has awarded $32,000 to the Edina, Richfield and Airport Police Departments to participate in the Safe and Sober traffic safety initiative. Each department will receive $10,650,to be used for overtime traffic enforcement efforts and equipment. This is the third year for this grant and the Airport PD will serve as the fiscal agent. The only costs to the City of Edina are the fuel and maintenance costs for the squad cars used during the enforcement waves. The enforcement efforts will focus on alcohol, speed and seat belt violations. a RESOLUTION NO. 2005-80 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT SAFE AND SOBER COMMUNITIES WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, Office of Traffic Safety has awarded the police departments of the Airport, Edina, and Richfield a grant for $32,000 in a combined joint effort; and WHEREAS, the money will be split equally by the three departments, $10,650 each, which will be used for overtime traffic enforcement efforts and equipment; and WHEREAS, the Airport Police Department will be the lead agency this year in the grant as far as managing the grant funds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina Police Department ,enter into a grant agreement with the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, Office of Traffic Safety for the project entitled SAFE & SOBER COMMUNITIES during the period from October 1, 2005 through September 30, 2006. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Edina Police Chief Michael Siitari is hereby authorized to execute such agreements and amendments as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the Edina Police Department. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Airport Police Chief Mark Rosenow is hereby authorized to be the fiscal agent and administer this grant on behalf of the Edina Police Department. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)SS CITY OF. EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK 1, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 6, 2005 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ City Clerk Athletica Building Sport Solutions Jim Hovland City of Edina 4801 W. W11. Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Phone: 612 - 874 -8550 Fax: 612- 874 -9362 QUOTATION Quote # GP0508- 112 -Q -MN (Todd Park Gameplex Hockey Rink) Dear Jim, Thank you for the opportunity to submit a quote to Supply Only an Athletica GamePlex Rink System. This rink is proposed to be 164 ft long by 80 ft wide, with a 20 ft radius. This project is to be in Todd Park- Grass Field. Drawings and Specifications not provided. Summary of scope of work by Premier Rinks Inc. dba Athletica (Athletica) will include: GAMEPLEX PRODUCT • All panels are 42" high and 8" wide. (Due to minimal expansion and contraction of medium density polyethylene, all sizes are approximate. • All panels are rotationally molded of UV stabilized polyethylene — Natural Color. • All panels are securely joined using PVC connecting dowels. MATERIALS INCLUDED • 38 each 8' Straight Panels • 2 each 4' Straight Panels • 16 each 8' Radius Panels • 1 each 8' Door Panels in the side of the rink. Door panels include a 36" door. • 57 each Connecting Dowels • 31 each 2" Schedule 40 Galvanized Steel Pipes 8' long for rink sides • 28 each 2" Schedule 40 Galvanized Steel Pipes 12' long for rink ends • 26 each 2" Schedule 40 Galvanized Steel Pipes 8' long for rink ends UPPER CONTAINMENT • 48" high Netting on two ends of rink including radius sections. • Netting to be 1 3/4" White Nylon Mesh. Net to be tape bound. • No Upper Containment included for rink sides. • Netting includes Galvanized Steel posts, Net Clamps and misc. hardware i CRYSTAPLEX- BORDER PAT R0h. GAMEPLFX 15300 251° Avenue N., Suite 600 -Minneapolis, MN 55447 •1.800.809.RINK (7465) •763.249.RINK (local) • 763.249.7475 (fax) www.athietica.com Athletica- Building Sport Solutions ADDITIONAL ITEMS INCLUDED IN BASE BID • A complete set of approval dwgs • Installation MUST be completed when ambient temperatures are over 32 degrees F. • Freight to Edina, Minnesota • One 8' Opening on one side for equipment access BASE BID TO SUPPLY ONLY (PER RINK) DECLINE ITEMS NOT INCLUDED IN BASE BID • Hockey Goal Frames • Off - Loading or Installation labor • Fencing or Shielding on Sides of rink • 6.5% Minnesota State Sales Tax $26,900.00 ACCEPT US FUNDS OPTIONAL PRICING - PLEASE INDICATE DESIRED OPTIONS OPTION #1 — SPECIAL 1 TIME DISCOUNT FOR TODD PARK • Cost savings for City of Edina - Special First Time purchase for Todd Park. • Savings to be applied to this project only and not set a precedent for future projects. • Order and Delivery must be completed in 2005. SPECIAL DISCOUNT — DEDUCT FROM BASE BID ($6,000.00) US FUNDS DECLINE ACCEPT, �CRYSTAPLEX- BORDER PATROL GAMEP" A 15300 25th Avenue N., Suite 600 -Minneapolis, MN 55447 •1.800.809.RINK (7465) •763.249.RINK (local) • 763.249.7475 (fax) www.athietica.com Athletica. Building Sport Solutions OPTION #2 — 6.5% MINNESOTA STATE SALES TAX • Cost to include 6.5% Minnesota State Sales Tax on the full base bid amount - "Discounted Price ". TO INCLUDE TAX - ADD TO BASE BID $1,358.50 US FUNDS DECLINE ACCEPT OPTION #3 — PROFESSIONAL HOCKEY GOAL FRAME PACKAGE • Cost to supply One Pair of Professional Ice Hockey goal frames. Goal Frame package to included 1 pair red Frames, 1 pair 4mm Knotless nets, 1 pair bottom pads, 1 pair of vertical pads and 1 pair of skirts- undressed. • Freight NOT included. Frames can ship with Gameplex if ordered at same time. • 6.5% Minnesota State Sales Tax NOT included. TO SUPPLY ONLY - ADD TO BASE BID $975.00 US FUNDS DECLINE ACCEPT. OPTION #4 — INSTALLATION OF BASE BID • Cost to supply installation labor to install the base bid system. • Installation labor to be based upon NON -Union Labor. • Rental costs for air compressor, post - pounder and generator included. • 6.5% Minnesota State Sales Tax NOT incluced. TO INSTALL - ADD TO BASE BID $3,900.00 US FUNDS DECLINE ACCEPT � CRYSTAPLEX" BORDER PATROL. �" U 15300 250' Avenue N., Suite 600 - Minneapolis, MN 55447 •1.800.809.RINK (7465) •763.249.RINK (local) • 763.249.7475 (fax) www.athietica.com Athletica- Building Sport Solutions FOB: Edina, MN. Unload in Parking Lot Prices firm for 60 days IT IS VERY IMPORTANT THAT THE FOLLOWING BE FILLED OUT: PROPOSED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 2005 Payment Terms: All payment terms based on Credit Approval (O.A.C) M • 50% Down Payment with Order • 50% Due 2 Weeks Prior to Shipping or Payment in full upon order with 1 % discount. Bob Vohnoutka — Midwest Sales If you require any additional information, please contact Bob Vohnoutka at 763- 249 -7416. This bid is subject to Athletica's Standard Terms and Conditions and Limited Warranty and may be withdrawn without penalty at anytime before contract execution. If accepted, sign and return one copy, and retain a duplicate for your files. When approved by one of our officers and returned, it becomes a binding contract. This quotation is subject to change, withdrawal, or cancellation until accepted by you. If we have not received your acceptance within 60 days from the date hereof, this quotation shall automatically expire. Athletica retains a security interest in all the products covered in this agreement until all sales' terms have been met. In addition, the purchaser agrees to sign any additional documents for Athletica to perfect its security interest in the products. CRYSTAPLEX- BORDER W PATROL- GMEPLEc` 15300 25'" Avenue N., Suite 600 -Minneapolis, MN 55447 - 1.800.809.RINK (7465) - 763.249.RINK (local) - 763.249.7475 (fax) - www.athletica.com Athletica. Building Sport Solutions The above proposal is accepted: President/Owner /General Manager For Premier Rinks Inc. dba Athletica Name of Signee (please print) Date Date Federal ID # In addition to the quotation the follow items have been sent: ❑ Standard Terms & Conditions for Athletica ❑ 3 Year Pro -Rated Gameplex Warranty ""�CRYSTAPLEX- BORDER * PATRO6. G"EP LEX- 1530025 1h Avenue N., Suite 600 - Minneapolis, MN 55447 - 1.800.809.RINK (7465) - 763.249.RINK (local) - 763.249.7475 (fax) - www.athletica.com Page 1 of 1 Jim Hovland From: Bob Vohnoutka [BVohnoutka @athletica.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 12:41 PM To: Edina - Jim Hovland Subject: Quote for Gameplex Jim: Please find attached the formal Gameplex quote for the Todd Park project as requested. I have included options for the following: 1 — First Time Discount 2- Minnesota State Sales Tax 3 —Goal Frame Package 4 — Installation At this point, I have not included the Chain Link fencing as an option. While it certainly could be provided, the only pricing I would have today would be the standard once piece stretch. With the premise of this being a "Portable" rink — the inclusion of Chain Link does not seem to be consistent with that use. I do know that it would add approx. 20 hours to the installation time initially. In thinking about Virginia, MN which is our most similar rink application — they are using netting successfully on an outdoor portable basis and seems to be the way to go. I hope this makes sense to you and that we can be a part of your Todd Park Project. Feel free to call with any questions and thank you for considering Athletica. for your needs. Bob Vohnoutka Bob Vohnoutka Midwest Sales Manager Athletica Building Sport Solutions 1.800.809.RINK (7465), x216 763 -475 -7475 (fax) http:/Awvm.athletica.com 9/6/2005 /ZrTAp �l o 1880 AGENDA ITEM: VI.D. SETTING HEARING DATE OF OCTOBER 18, 2005 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS No packet data [-] Oral presentation 1-1 Information coming REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # VLE From:, Solvei Wilmot Consent F] Recycling Coordinator Information Only ❑ Date: September 6, 2005 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA To Council Subject: Extension of Residential Action ® Motion Recycling Collection ❑ Resolution Contract ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: To extend the residential recycling contract with Allied Waste Services (formerly Browning Ferris Industries (BFI) of MN) for recycling collection through 2007. Info /Background: Allied Waste Services presented a three year contract extension proposal to the Recycling and Solid Waste Commission at their July meeting. The Commission discussed the proposal and rejected the three year proposal which contained collection rate increases for each year, but kept the revenue sharing at the same rate. The commission then recommended considering a one year extension in order to continue with the revenue sharing and then evaluate the benefits of revenue sharing. Since that meeting, Allied Waste Services presented staff with a contract proposal for a two year extension which keeps the collection rates at the current rate for the next two years and the revenue sharing from the sale of the commodities at the same percentage. In addition, the proposal offers to do a Single -sort recycling collection study for Edina residents at no charge to Edina. Single -sort is a way to collect recyclables using a cart instead of bin and the residents do not have to sort the paper items from the rigid items, which is currently done. The cart is dumped into a collection truck by an automated arm. The materials are then taken to a recycling facility and sorted into the different commodities by equipment and laborers. Considering the collection rates will not be increased for two years, revenue sharing, will continue and Allied Waste Services will -provide a study, staff is recommending this proposal. August 25, 2005 Waste Services AV ALLIED WASTE SERVICES City of Edina Recycling Contract Extension Request BFI/Allied Waste has enjoyed our relationship with the City of Edina and would hope to continue that relationship for many years to come. This note is to request an extension of the current recycling contract that the City of Edina has with BFI/Allied Waste Services. We believe that our strong history with the City and the professional performance of this contract would allow us to seek a two -year term on the service agreement. We would like to offer the following proposal at this time: Term: We would respectfully request.a 2 -year extension of the current agreement. Recycling Service Rates: BFI/Allied will not raise the rates for the entire agreement extension. We will hold the current rates until 2008 ... with no price increases! The current rates are $2.40 for single - family dwellings and $2.20 for multi -unit dwellings. Revenue Sharing with the City of Edina: BFI/Allied will continue to offer the Revenue Sharing Plan to the City of Edina as it is currently written. For the first 7 months 1005, that revenue sharing plan has allowed for a $57,176.00 rebate to the City of Edina ... or $.61 per home! Edina's net . per home was therefore $1.79 —one of the lowest prices for these services in the Greater Twin Cities Metro area! As a point of comparison, the cities of Minnetonka, Plymouth, and Golden Valley recently renegotiated their joint recycling contract. The new monthly rate is $2.50 per residence for single - family and up to 8 -unit multi - family dwellings. They have 40,000 housing units in this group (Edina has approximately 15,000) and receive a 100% rebate after a $49.60 processing fee. Without factoring in the rebate, Edina pays an average of $2.20 a piece for both single- family and multi - family units. The Edina rate would be $30 less than Minnetonka, Plymouth, and Golden Valley -- for almost 25,000 fewer housing units. Possible Single -Sort Recycling Pilot Study for Edina Residents: BFI/Allied will offer to work with the Edina Recycling and Solid Waste Commission to develop and implement a pilot program for Single Sort Recycling at some point in the first year of the agreement extension. Single -Sort Recycling is the newest innovation in recycling services -- -and is getting rave reviews from residents and recycling groups! It greatly increases the number of tons of recyclable material collected and increases the number of people who actually recycle at their homes. It allows the homeowner to put all recyclable materials in the same cart without having to sort or separate the materials. We'll do all of the sorting and processing at our new Minneapolis Recycling Facility for them. For the proposed pilot study, we will provide the selected residents with a cart that is similar to their trash cart-- except that it is smaller. The blue cart will have "Single Sort Recycling Only" stickers, wheels and a connected lid that is colored light -grey to distinguish it from the trash carts. There will be no cost to the City for this project. hope that by offering you one of the best service rates in town (and offering no rate increases until 2008), an outstanding .;nue- sharing rebate each month, innovations like Single -Sort Recycling, and our professional level of recycling service, that we can continue to provide these services for the citizens of Edina. 9813 Flying Cloud Drive, Eden Prairie, MN 55347 • P.O. Box 1375, Minneapolis, MN 55440 WI Waste Services ALLIED WASTE SERVICES Sort Recycling one cart. Nesorlinow I No kidding.) o� §fie $ec� �ktan inr. 13 The easiest way to recycle is here! Allied Waste is proud to introduce Single Sort Recycling. Place all recycling in one cart without separating or sorting! Simply follow the guidelines on the reverse side of this flyer for hassle free recycling. One cart. No sorting. (no kidding!) UA4A a�so♦t �9cy %h R NUa'•• nuir The easiest way to recycle is here! Allied Waste is proud to introduce Single Sort Recycling. Place all recycling in one cart without separating or sorting! Simply follow the guidelines on the reverse side of this flyer for hassle free recycling. One cart. No sorting. (no kidding!) UA4A a�so♦t �9cy %h R M %0 W a0°= 3w> a aV -+= a 1 S�ng1e ��y�itrg to x z c m e . ........ Ln CD �- w Place all your recyclable material in the new CD recycling cart without separating or sorting! >� Pick -up will be every other week in most areas. Lidded cart rolls easily to the end of the driveway, no more lugging the bin! The lid keeps your recyclables dry and prevents them from blowing around the neighborhood. The new Single Sort Recycling cart is 68 gallons. It has the same footprint as the old bin, so it won't take up more space in your garage. There is no separating The easiest way to recycle, and it is here in your or sorting of recyclables neighborhood! in your blue cart with the Waste grey lid. Your new Single Sort Recycling cart is Services the easiest uwo wun uewcu way to recycle! ko"', ANA, owe \vz, (n . 0 To: Mayor & City Council From: Bob Wilson City Assessor Date: September 6, 2005 Subject: SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DEFERMENT POLICY I Recommendation: Adopt attached policy. Information /Background: REPORT /RECOMMENDATION The current Special Assessment Deferment Policy was adopted by the City Council in 1995. This policy allows homeowners who are 65 years of age or older or retired due to a permanent and total disability, to defer special assessments. To be eligible for the deferment, the applicant must own the property either alone or in joint tenancy with a spouse who also lives in the same property, but does not need to be 65 years of age or permanently and totally disabled. The property must be classified and taxed as homestead property. In addition, the first year's installment of the special assessment, either alone or when combined with other special assessments, must exceed 2% of the total household income. Agenda Item VI. F. Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion The current Special Assessment Deferment Policy was adopted by the City Council in 1995. This policy allows homeowners who are 65 years of age or older or retired due to a permanent and total disability, to defer special assessments. To be eligible for the deferment, the applicant must own the property either alone or in joint tenancy with a spouse who also lives in the same property, but does not need to be 65 years of age or permanently and totally disabled. The property must be classified and taxed as homestead property. In addition, the first year's installment of the special assessment, either alone or when combined with other special assessments, must exceed 2% of the total household income. REPORT /RECOMMENDATION - SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DEFERMENT POLICY September 6, 2005 Page 2 The deferred- assessment accrues interest at a rate of one (1) percent in excess of the rate of interest charged on the special assessment had it not been deferred. The period of deferment is indefinite, but according to law terminates: • Upon the death of the owner, • ° Upon the sale or transfer of the property, • Upon the loss of the homestead status of the property, or • Whenever the City determines that a hardship no longer exists. For equity and fairness, changes are recommended in a couple of areas: 1) The current interest rate for the deferral program is one percentage point higher than the standard assessment rate. This should change to reflect the new interest rate policy that was adopted (bond rate plus 2 %). " 2) The current deferral policy requires that both spouses live in the residence. This should be changed to reflect situations that have one of the spouses residing in a facility that accommodates health care situations (i.e. assisted living centers, etc.). ° The attached deferment policy incorporates these changes and an administrative change in the application deadline from November 29 to November 15. We recommend adoption of this updated policy. 9 RESOLUTION NO. 2005-78 AUTHORIZING SPECIAL ASSESSMENT SENIOR DEFERRAL PROGRAM City of Edina WHEREAS, by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193 through 435.195, the City is authorized and empowered to defer the payment of special assessments against homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older or retired by virtue of a permanent and total disability for whom payment of such special assessment would be a hardship; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina deems it desirable and in the best interests of the City of Edina and its citizens to implement such authority and power by establishing standards, guidelines and procedures for the granting and processing of such deferments; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the following standards, guidelines and procedures are hereby established and adopted: ELIGIBILITY STANDARDS • The applicant must be 65 years of age or older or retired by virtue of a permanent and total disability, and • The applicant must be the fee simple owner of the property or must be a contract vendee for fee simple ownership, and • The property for which deferment is requested must be classified and taxed as homestead property by the City Assessor as of the date the application for deferment is made, and • The first years installment of the proposed special assessment must, either alone or in the aggregate with installments of other special assessments due against the property and payable in the first year of the proposed assessment, total more than two percent of the applicant's total household income as defined by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 290A. INTEREST RATE Any special assessment deferred pursuant to this policy shall bear interest at the prevailing interest rate applicable at the time the assessment was originally levied. TERMINATION Special Assessment payments deferred pursuant to the eligibility requirements set forth by this policy shall become payable effective upon the occurrence of one of the following events: City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 -826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 • The subject property is sold, transferred, subdivided, or in any way conveyed to another by the fee owner qualified for deferral status. • The death of the fee- owner qualified for deferral status unless a surviving joint tenant, tenant in common, or contract vendee is eligible for the deferral benefit provided hereunder. • The property loses its homestead status for any reason. • The City council determines that there would be no hardship to require an immediate or partial payment of the deferred special assessment. PROCEDURES. • The applicant for deferment must file a completed application and affidavit with the City Assessor on or before November 15th of the year preceding the year for which deferral status is requested in order to implement the deferral program for said year. • All applications for deferment shall. be made on forms prepared and supplied by Hennepin County and the City of Edina. • The City Assessor shall include in any and all mailed notices of public hearings with respect to special assessments, a statement explaining the deferment policy hereby adopted. • The City Assessor shall transmit all deferments granted pursuant to this policy to the Hennepin County Auditor for recording with the Office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota, so as to give notice of such deferment to all future owners and encumbrancers of the property for which a deferment has been granted. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council shall not be prohibited from determining that a hardship exists, and that a deferment should be granted on the above terms and conditions, even if the eligibility requirements are not met by an applicant, provided that the Council finds that: • There are exceptional and unusual circumstances not covered by the foregoing standards and guidelines, and • If granted, the deferment will have been made in a non - discriminatory manner, and • The granting of the deferment will not give the applicant an unreasonable preference over other applicants. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that failure of the City to give notice pursuant to this policy or the granting or denial of any deferment shall not invalidate any special assessment otherwise made and levied by the City of Edina pursuant to applicable statutory requirements. ATTEST: City Clerk 2 Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS + CITY OF EDINA ). CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City. of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted,by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 6, 2005, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_. City Clerk 3 1 4A, ow Le H les8 AGENDA ITEM: VI.G. RESOLUTION NO. 2005-79 SETTING HEARING DATE OF OCTOBER 4, 2005 ALLEY VACATION, INDIANOLA AND 50TH STREET No packet data F-] Oral presentation ❑ Information coming REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Wayne D. Houle, PE�. City Engineer Date: September 6, 2005 Subject: Resolution to adopt the Minnehaha Creek Vision and to continue the . Minnehaha Creek Partnership Recommendation: Agenda Item # vi.x Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance Discussion Adopt the attached resolutions to adopt the Minnehaha Creek Vision and a resolution to continue the Minnehaha Creek Visioning Partnership. Info /Background: The Minnehaha Creek Visioning Partnership is a joint project by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) and the United States Army Corps of Engineers ( USACE). It is part of a larger watershed -scale planning and design effort for the watershed. The recommended Vision will be considered by both the MCWD °and the USACE as they move forward with plans and designs. This Vision is also intended as guidance for other organizations, such as cities and the Minneapolis Park Board, which share creek corridor management responsibilities, see attached document. This process took over a year to complete. The City of Edina had two residents appointed to the Citizens Advisory Committee, Mr. Jeff Ryan and Mr. Jack Sullivan. Council Member Housh was appointed to the Elected Officials Committee as I was appointed to the Technical Advisory Committee. Mr. Ryan, Mr. Sullivan, along with Council Member Housh should be commended for time spent on this process. The resolution essentially adopts the vision and continues the City's commitment to working with the watershed district. Mike Wyatt with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District will be present to answer any questions that the Council may have. 0 G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Storm Sewer\Minnehaha Creek Watershed District \509 Plan \Visioning Process\rr mcwd partnership.doc FINAL DRAFT MINNEHAHA CREEK VISIONING PARTNERSHIP RECOMAMNDATIONS INTRODUCTION The Minnehaha Creek Visioning Partnership is a joint project by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) and the United States Army Corps of Engineers ( USACE). It is part of a larger watershed -scale planning and design effort for the watershed. The recommended Vision will be considered by both the MCWD and the USACE as they move forward with plans and designs. This Vision is also intended as guidance for other organizations, such as cities and the Minneapolis Park Board, which share creek corridor management responsibilities. The hope is that all organizations can work together toward a common vision for the creek. THE VISIONING PROCESS Both public and agency input were solicited for developing the Vision. Public input was obtained through an appointed Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC). Agency input was obtained through a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). The focus of the CAC was to recommend a Vision, recommend actions and explore the social feasibility of recommendations. The role of the TAC was to assess the technical feasibility of recommendations made by the CAC. Participation for the CAC was requested from the following for a total of 23 participants: City of Minneapolis (2) City of Edina (2) City of St. Louis Park (2) City of Hopkins (2) City of Minnetonka (2) Minneapolis Park Board (2) Hennepin County (2) Citizens of the Watershed nominated by the MCWD (9) The process also accommodated additional interested citizens at the various workshops and activities held during the process, and an Open House meeting was held to obtain additional public input on the CAC recommendations. However, only the appointed CAC members "voted" on the final recommendations. The process used with the CAC consisted of twelve workshops organized into three Phases as follows. ♦ Phase 1, called "Where have we been ? ", focused on developing a shared understanding of the history of the creek, and involved a workshop to develop a joint history/chronology of the creek and its environment. ♦ Phase 2, called "Where are we now ? ", focused on determining current conditions of the creek, including current perceptions, desired attributes, and existing visions. Meeting topics included: • Watershed management approaches • Geomorphology and physical setting of the creek o Watershed and land use characteristics • Hydrology and hydraulics of the creek • Water quality • Aquatic biology • Current perceptions of the creek • Existing vision and plans by organizations along the creek corridor ♦ Phase 3, called "Where can we be ?," focused on the development of a common vision and management recommendations. 8/11/2005 FINAL DRAFT CAC meeting summaries are available upon request. The TAC met twice during the visioning process. The first meeting focused on introducing the project and the modeling scenarios. The second meeting presented the modeling scenario results and evaluated the technical feasibility of the scenarios. TAC meeting summaries are available upon request. THE RECOMMENDED VISION This subsection presents the CAC recommendations. The section starts with summaries of CAC and TAC discussions to provide context regarding the recommendations. The recommended vision and specific management recommendations follow the discussion summaries. Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) Discussions The recommended vision was the result of much discussion. Two CAC exercises in particular helped participants identify and discuss the desired condition of the creek and priorities. Results of these exercises are summarized below and followed by the recommended vision statement. A swarming exercise was completed at the sixth meeting of the CAC. Participants were asked to indicate what the current condition of the creek was and what it should be for various attributes. Results of the exercise are presented in Table 1, where the number represents the number of participants that choose that condition. These results showed that for all attributes participants desired an improved condition. At a subsequent meeting participants were asked to rank these attributes, and were also asked through an ordinal ranking exercise, to rank a larger list of characteristics. Results of these exercises are presented in Figures 1 and 2. These results show remarkable agreement, with the physical condition/streambank erosion ranked as the highest priority and aquatic life ranked second for each exercise. Most participants agreed with the results, that erosion control should be a top management priority. One participant disagreed, saying that erosion is a natural part of creeks. After discussion, the CAC agreed that the problem was really accelerated erosion. The CAC also agreed that aquatic life and cultural/historic resources were top priorities. They also agreed that what is cultural/historical vanes by reach but is comprised of: 1) the whole setting/history and settlement of Minnehaha Creek (e.g., its place in history because of Longfellow's poem (The Song of Hiawatha) as well as the historical park visions of Cleveland and Wirth); and 2) the physical historical features, such as the Grand Rounds, trails, mills, and WPA projects. In discussing open space, the CAC agreed that it is not so much the acreage of open space that is important, but the feeling of being surrounded by the natural environment with limited human encroachment. When discussing the lower ranked characteristics, the participants agreed that they did not feel that canoeing was a low priority. Rather its lower ranking had to do with its specificity as it is really a subset of recreation. One participant disagreed that fishing should be a lower priority stating that the general public wants more fishing opportunities. Others thought that fishing as a recreational opportunity was not a high priority. Another important exercise that influenced recommendations was the creation of a systems diagram showing the interrelationships between the following characteristics: flow/hydrology, aesthetics, land - based recreation, water -based recreation, aquatic life, streambank erosion, cultural resources, open space, flooding, aquatic habitat, and water quality. This exercise was done in a small break -out group. For each characteristic the group determined whether it drives (or controls or influences) versus whether it primarily receives, or is influenced by, other characteristics. This exercise led to the following conclusions: 8/11/2005 2 FINAL DRAFT ♦ Hydrology is the main driver (i.e., primarily influences other characteristics). ♦ Aesthetics is the main receiver (i.e., is primarily influenced by other characteristics). ♦ Land -based recreation is largely a receiver, or is influenced by other functions. Aquatic life and water -based recreation were also receivers. ♦ Water quality, bank erosion, and aquatic habitat are receivers from physical characteristics like flow, but drive biological characteristics like aquatic life. ♦ Cultural resources can be a receiver if influenced by physical characteristics like flow that erode or impact cultural resources, but cultural resources can also drive management of many of the other characteristics from the perspective that they affect how they can be managed. ♦ Open space does not have clear linkages. It does, however, drive hydrology /flow by affecting the amount of impervious surface and runoff. ♦ Flooding drives a number of other issues, but it is also a receiver from hydrology. It can also be affected by flow inefficiencies created by aquatic habitat (i.e., obstructions caused by woody debris), sediment from bank erosion, as well as how cultural/historic resources were originally constructed. The CAC also recognized that the vision of a desirable aesthetic for the corridor varies from person to person. For some, a desirable aesthetic means natural/wild vegetation. Others view this as overgrown and want a more manicured look and an open view of the creek. The CAC agreed that an undesirable aesthetic is something that does not fit and appears unnatural or in a deteriorated, non - indigenous condition. Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Discussions The TAC met on two separate occasions to review and discuss the approach to the development of the technical material produced by the project team and also material and recommendations resulting from the CAC discussions. The intended function of the TAC was to evaluate both the approach as well as the technical feasibility of implementing the overall Vision put forth by the CAC. The TAC meetings consisted of members from the Cities of Minnetonka, Hopkins, St. Louis Park, Edina and Minneapolis, the Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board, Hennepin County, Minnesota Pollution Control, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. The TAC acknowledged both the breadth and scope of the modeling effort undertaken by the project team but also recognized the limitations of these efforts. The TAC had the opportunity through meetings to receive clarification on technical issues, provide insight and represent the perspectives of each individual organization in the development of the technical material by the project team and recommended Vision by the CAC. Meeting summaries are available upon request. 8/11/2005 FINAL DRAFT Table 1: MCMM Visioning Meeting 6 Prioritization Results (Number represents the number of participants that chose that condition) Condition 011-1-ent Condition It Condition Should lie Aquatic Life 1. Excellent: Diverse communities of fish and ,macroinvertebrates 9 2. Good: Communities better than typical urban streams 3 20 3. Fair: Communities typical of urban streams 18 1 4. Poor: Communities worse than typical urban streams 7 Canoeing, Condition Condition Shotild e 1. Great: Sufficient flow, good access, and safe 1 16 2. Good 8 11 3. Fair 14 4. Poor 4 5. No canoeing possible 1 Passive (hiking and nature viewing). Recreational Suitability.' Condition Cul-rent Condition It Condition Should lie 1. Good: Access and trails 4 20 2. Access and trails okay 7 6 3. Access and trails limiting 15 4. Passive recreation not enjoyable Physical Condition (erosion) Condition C111-1-ent Condition It Condition Should lie 1. No bank erosion 11 2. Some bank erosion 3 16 3. Definite bank erosion 20 4. Severe bank erosion 4 &arance Aesthetic.App Condition 011-1-ent Condition It Condition Should Be 1. Beautiful 17 2. Minor aesthetic problems 6 10 3. Fair, over own, visibility limited, some trash 20 4. Poor, trash, debris and urban refuse common Flood Damage and Safe Condition Current Condition It Condition Should Be 1. Minor: Overbank flooding, no property damage 6 19 2. Moderate: Road crossing flooding, traffic issue, some property (non - structure) damage 18 3 3. Major: Property damage to structures and safety (loss of life) issue 8/11/2005 FINAL DRAFT Figure 1: Minnehaha Creek Visioning Prioritization Ranking /Score Results 25 20 15 10 5 0 Aquatic Life Canoeing Passive Physical Recreation Condition (streambank erosion) Value /Criteria Aesthetic Flood Appearance Damage and Safety 8/11/2005 5 Figure 2: Minnehaha Creek Visioning Ordinal Ranking Results 250 ° c) 200 0 150 100 50 cc 0 U C y C C U O N O U CU O cLn Q O U H o N U U Q Q cz W c� _ U a 0 o O ¢ U Value /Criteria 8/11/2005 5 FINAL DRAFT Recommended Vision Recommendations include an overall vision statement and specific management recommendations regarding various creek management issues. These specific management issues include recommendations regarding the CAC's highest priorities: streambank erosion and aquatic life improvement, as well as stream flow recommendations. The CAC also developed recommendations for improving water quality, as well as a number of criteria for decision makers to consider when making site specific decisions regarding dam/weir removal, sediment removal, and when prioritizing specific projects. The CAC recognizes that recommendations vary depending on location, and some recommendations are organized by the stream sections shown in Figure 3. Overall Vision. The CAC recommends the following overall vision. The Vision for Minnehaha Creek includes both an existing and desired sense of place. With respect to the existing sense of place, the creek: ♦ Is a corridor with various reaches and destinations, ♦ Serves as a gathering place for people, ♦ Provides recreational opportunities, ♦ Is a contemporary cultural resource, yet it also reflects our history, and ♦ Provides natural and aesthetic experiences unique to its setting. Within the creek corridor it is also desired to: ♦ Provide balanced opportunities to experience the creek, ♦ Improve the natural environment, ♦ Improve water quality, ♦ Have variation and physical differences, and ♦ Be reflective of our history and a priority for our future. Management Priorities. CAC group exercises discussed above showed that erosion control and aquatic life were the highest ranked priorities for improvement. However, the CAC recognized that priorities and the primary management emphasis varied by location along the creek. Therefore, the CAC was asked to recommend an overall management priority for the creek by section. These recommendations are presented in Table 2. When asked in this fashion, recreation came out as a higher management priority for Sections A and B than erosion and aquatic life. This change reflects the recognition that recreation is the primary use in the corridor, along with the recognition the erosion is less severe in the upper sections than it is in Section C. Earlier results with higher rankings for aquatic life and erosion also reflect the context of that discussion which was based on priorities for improvement. Recreation is already perceived as a well established use, and management to preserve and protect this use is important as can be seen from the results in Table 2. The overall vision emphasizes recreation while improving the natural environment. Stream Bank Erosion Recommendations Improvements to streambank erosion were the highest ranked priority overall for the creek, and, as shown in Table 2, was the highest ranked management priority for Section C of the creek. Erosion is not perceived as being as severe in Sections A and B of the creek. For all sections, the CAC prefers streambank stabilization technologies that incorporate vegetation (i.e., bioengineering technologies) over rip -rap, retaining walls, and other forms of artificial stabilization. This preference is due to the habitat benefit from vegetation which complements the CAC's desire for improved aquatic life in the creek. It was also recommended that any storm sewer outfalls to the creek contributing to localized bank erosion be re- worked. 8/11/2005 6 C7 I L e waau tea O D d O 2 • e Wgaan tie 1 4 V . �armneorriYe. ,'O d' �a� � s �ar+ea• 4 'W � P tAe.Nnrr.wa0 00 ,1 o © DO O e LAW am" O Section B 1 1 1 1 1 I . 1 1 1 1 1 �q • � 1 Q d A . �1 1 1 a' �Yeesm t. I I 1 4 I 6 1 V . �armneorriYe. ,'O d' �a� � s �ar+ea• 4 'W � P tAe.Nnrr.wa0 00 ,1 o © DO O e LAW am" O Section B 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I I 1 1 6 266r Avenue SoM 10 / / I / LAW / t.r a ra wa / da CtlMU+ I O 1 1 / teY AlleweW 9 .1. 10 r�Is� y s j Railroad Crossing uabew. ti. Below Interstate 494 Near Plymouth Road / e Browndale Dam Section C — — — — - — - 0- NOee Ntane 1 1 2 I 3 1 Gla"M Creek SA 1 6 V" 3/N Street _ 7 _ BramexWe Dam B / 6 266r Avenue SoM 10 / / I / LAW / t.r a ra wa / da CtlMU+ I O 1 1 / teY AlleweW 9 .1. 10 a- a DI... Law 4 CIO . • Highway 55 NOee Ntane 1 Pawers Creek 2 Qx MM Crack 3 1 Lake Croak Gla"M Creek SA _.._.._. 6er Oren RR Craaskp Near P"-A Reed 6 V" 3/N Street _ 7 _ BramexWe Dam B Lrwehmw 6 266r Avenue SoM 10 • NDOOa Streams 0 Lakoa Q YlAte WW BounOary Figure 3: Minnehaha Creek Watershed N main Nodes For Evaluating Watershed Managment Scenarios YiurUM l'M IkIMled lliSlflll dP '0 1.5 3 6 9 12 I- W— w Q -d,.yo [— 0 -14.06 Maes FINAL DRAFT Aquatic Habitat Management Recommendations Aquatic life was the second highest ranked priority of the CAC. Presentations by experts showed that the most significant limiting conditions for aquatic life are stream flow, particularly the lack of winter flow in the creek, and poor quality habitat. Flow recommendations presented in the next subsection address the quantity of habitat that occurs at different flows. However, those recommendations do not address the quality of habitat. To address the quality of habitat, recommendations were developed for: ♦ In- stream habitat (indirect or direct management) ♦ Riparian vegetation management ♦ Woody debris management ♦ Sediment removal (e.g., dredging) ♦ Dam and weir removal These recommendations are presented for each topic separately below. In- Stream Habitat. Given the wetland characteristics 'of Section A, the CAC felt there is little to gain from active management of in -stream habitat. In Sections B and C, the CAC acknowledged the importance of good in -stream habitat for aquatic organisms, but prefers to indirectly manage in -stream habitat by managing riparian vegetation and encouraging the retention of woody debris. Riparian Vegetation Management. Riparian vegetation management was perceived as an integral part of achieving the CAC's vision for improving aquatic life in Minnehaha Creek. The CAC recommends a preferred approach to in -stream habitat management that indirectly manages in -stream habitat by managing riparian vegetation and encouraging the retention of woody debris. With this approach, the riparian corridor becomes the primary mechanism for managing in -stream habitat. The CAC spent much time discussing specific recommendations for riparian vegetation management. These discussions resulted in the following overall recommendations: 8/11/2005 FINAL DRAFT ♦ Develop a community and organizational philosophy that values minimal impact approaches for both citizen and public works activities within the riparian corridor by: • Establishing a more natural riparian buffer to serve as a source of woody debris, wildlife habitat, and a separation from urban uses: • Encouraging the establishment of a natural buffer that enhances streambank stability; • Encouraging native plant species; and • Controlling invasive plant species. ♦ Create incentives for good/positive practices and for the use of native vegetation through tax credits, cost sharing, and availability of free seeds/plants and technical assistance. ♦ Use marketing, promotional, public relations, social pressure and education efforts to foster a change in expectations and behavior that embraces a more natural/native riparian environment. ♦ Develop and maintain a shared implementation vision for the riparian corridor by: • Communicating the vision of the committee to decision makers, • Maintaining the investment through on -going maintenance of restoration efforts, • Improving inter- government coordination, and • Completing periodic progress reviews. The CAC also developed recommendations and brainstormed implementation ideas for the creek Sections B and C. In general, the CAC felt that riparian conditions in Section A were in pretty good shape. What is most needed is to protect it from encroachment. When asked about the desirability of water level management of the wetland area upstream of I494 to help manage vegetation and exotic species, participants felt that the benefits and management actions for this were not sufficiently understood to give an opinion. Water level management in the wetland is possible because of a stop log structure located where the creek flows under I494. For Sections B and C, riparian vegetation management needs to be completed as a combination of agency action and encouragement of local property owners. Specific ideas for consideration for Sections B and C are presented in Tables 3 and 4 respectively. The CAC felt that these ideas need more evaluation and decided to include them in this report not as recommendations, but as ideas for further consideration. 8/11/2005 9 FINAL DRAFT Table 3: Section B Riparian Vegetation Brainstorming Ideas ♦ More high water storage (e.g., ponds and wetlands) ♦ Modify trails to reduce impervious (reducing impermeable surfaces, by replacing cement with wood chips or natural materials on paths (rain gardens)) ♦ Changing of drain design to not let as much debris into creek ♦ Reduction of storm/drains that flow into creek ♦ Storm water outfalls need help... Minnetonka Mills Area. (Use box outfalls, armour outfall areas, reduce flashiness, store water) Reduce negative inflow (e.g., from storm sewers, ♦ Controlling stormwater ♦ Stormwater volume control Fix direction of stormwater pipes ♦ Dredging where outfall areas create problems, but not aesthetics like Mill pond — unless private funding. 8/11/2005 10 ♦ Offer incentives ♦ Tax breaks for good stewardship ♦ $1 million on lake Mtka (maybe $100,00 on creek) in taxes/property which you get back if you change your ways ♦ Planting of plants and/or trees that will have positive effect (along banks) 0 to 20 feet back ♦ Create riparian vegetation at parks to encourage participation ♦ Plant trees along Hwy 100 Create incentives to remove chain link fences, steel walls, wooden barriers, and fake rock from shoreline ♦ Involve neighbors (e.g. not cutting down to creek — buffer) ♦ Parks as an example ♦ Creek clean up (garbage. etc.) ♦ Education of residents o Not dumping ground • Native/Positive vegetation • Lawn care consequence, options ♦ Get information out to general public about what they can do to lessen negative impact habits ♦ Community awareness o Newsletters o Community gatherings in city parks "Minnehaha Creek Days" ♦ Communication plan with cities • Signs on trails • Newsletters *.Give recognition for good stewardship ♦ Work with businesses, (proactively) to address creek pollution runoff issues (e.g., Methodist Hosp., Target) ♦ Get cities/other organizations to follow recommendations ♦ Provide planting recommendations and mgmt. guidelines to neighborhoods ♦ Education of property owners 1. Financial aid 2. Technical support 3. Physical help 4. "Call for Help" list of agencies ♦ Do small things ♦ Support lower food chain life will support higher food chain life ♦ Support buffers/macroinvertebrates Talk with city to change practice of cutting grass (maintaining grass) around the creek. City needs to model the behavior. FINAL DRAFT Table 4: Section C Riparian Vegetation Brainstorming Ideas • Incorporate stormwater management in re- development and consider in land use planning • Create stormwater marshes, holding areas, and marshes that slow and settle down flow before entering the creek • Create rain gardens on Mpls Park Board Property • Create rainwater garden demonstration sites at parking areas and other large sites • More wetlands in the floodplain Reduce Street Runoff (trash, pollutants, etc.) • Discourage goat paths • Grade control • Reduce human & mechanical effects (vehicles, construction, mowing, etc.) • Target highly eroded banks for revetments • Manage invasive species • Restore meanders in reaches 7 and 8 • Inventory existing plant species and encourage native plant species in buffer zone • Wood duck nests, wren houses, eagle platforms • Narrow paths and roadways (pavement reduction) • Bum natural vegetation areas • More un -mowed surface near the creek • Leave a 25 ft wide buffer of un -mowed vegetation • Sustainable trail design • Encourage native vegetation • Provide free (grass or prairie) seed or shoots, Etc. • Provide tax credit for natural vegetation on private property • Provide incentives for landowners for good/positive practices Have contests for the "wildest" stretch ( "adopt -a- stretch ") awards • Marketing • Publicity • Do model (demonstration) sites, test sites, with signs explaining what is going on ♦ Educate local landowners and users about reducing impacts. (Penalize if necessary) • Signs explaining the value of prairie, etc. • Community outreach to residents regarding downspout direction and direct them to greenspace • Adopt the NWF wildlife program by blocks or neighborhoods • "Naturalize" tolerate natural imperfections. (Don't try to "over- civilize" the corridor) • Schools adopt a stretch, improve it (science project) • Educate city employees and MPRB on BMP's and where grass clippings shouldn't be, where tree sawdust should be, erosion control measures in city projects • Educate park system users on low- impact recreation and educate adjacent landowners on yard maintenance Local history - Post old pictures of same locations (before, after, now...) • Communicate the vision to decision makers • Deputize local residents to observe, record, report, or intervene in local "problems." • Post boundaries • More money for management • Ordinance for land -use planning providing more green space for infiltration of stormwater. Provide buffer or alternative to water treatment. • Setting guidance for riparian zone • Survey the segment to evaluate current condition • Improve inter - government coordination • Purchase easements Maintain investments in restoration projects (educate & train volunteers to manage projects) 8/11/2005 11 FINAL DRAFT Woody Debris Management. The recommendations regarding management of woody debris in the creek presented in Table 5 where shaped by the following findings and considerations: ♦ One of the limiting factors for aquatic life in Minnehaha Creek is poor habitat quality. ♦ Woody debris is a natural component of many streams and adds complexity to aquatic habitat by providing substrate for organisms to colonize, creating refuge areas, and by creating pools. ♦ Currently quality habitat created by woody debris is largely missing from Minnehaha Creek. ♦ Woody debris can obstruct the creek and create problems for canoeing. ♦ Woody debris can become entangled in bridges and culverts affecting flooding. ♦ Woody debris can change local flow patterns affecting bank erosion. Table 5: Recommended Management Approach for Woody Debris Sediment Removal. The CAC recommends that sediment removal should not be a generally applied management practice for any of the sections. However, there could be special cases for pools and ponds along the creek. The CAC recognized that if dams are left in place, sediment will accumulate in the pools, and periodic removal of sediment will be necessary to maintain open water aesthetics. In general, however, the CAC felt that money would be better spent reducing sediment loads (i.e., fixing the problem or controlling sediment before it reaches the creek). The CAC also agreed that decisions regarding sediment removal from ponds were site - specific. They developed a list of recommended criteria for decision makers to use when making these types of decisions. These criteria are presented below in the subsection titled Recommended Decision Criteria. Dam and Weir Removal. Habitat in Sections B and C of the creek is negatively impacted by the presence of dams and weirs. Removing some of these structures provides opportunities to create free - flowing stream channels with habitat conditions restored. This would favor aquatic species adapted to flowing water rather than the lake types of species that currently dominate the creek biota. However, some of these structures have historic /cultural significance, as well as local value.. One participant stated that a plan to remove Browndale Avenue Dam would certainly generate significant opposition. Other participants were hesitant to stop discussion of this concept for any of the structures without further study. One participant suggested that the acceptability of this practice would depend on what stream flows could be maintained, and it would not be desirable to trade the pools for a dry stream bed. All participants agreed that decisions regarding dam/weir removal are site specific agreed that further study of the impacts and opportunities would be needed before detailed recommendations could be given. Structures for more study include: Section B: Browndale Avenue Dam West 44t' Street grade control Louisiana Avenue and Meadowbrook Road grade controls Blake Road and Lake Street NE grade controls West 34'h Street weir 8/11/2005 12 Given the wetland and lake Woody debris provides an Woody debris provides an like characteristics of this important habitat benefit and important habitat benefit and section woody debris should be encouraged. should be encouraged. probably was not a significant However, it should be However, it should be historic factor. Thus, there is removed/managed where is removed/managed where it no recommendation to creates obstructions to creates obstructions to actively encourage woody canoeing and potentially canoeing and potentially debris. impacts flooding. impacts flooding. Sediment Removal. The CAC recommends that sediment removal should not be a generally applied management practice for any of the sections. However, there could be special cases for pools and ponds along the creek. The CAC recognized that if dams are left in place, sediment will accumulate in the pools, and periodic removal of sediment will be necessary to maintain open water aesthetics. In general, however, the CAC felt that money would be better spent reducing sediment loads (i.e., fixing the problem or controlling sediment before it reaches the creek). The CAC also agreed that decisions regarding sediment removal from ponds were site - specific. They developed a list of recommended criteria for decision makers to use when making these types of decisions. These criteria are presented below in the subsection titled Recommended Decision Criteria. Dam and Weir Removal. Habitat in Sections B and C of the creek is negatively impacted by the presence of dams and weirs. Removing some of these structures provides opportunities to create free - flowing stream channels with habitat conditions restored. This would favor aquatic species adapted to flowing water rather than the lake types of species that currently dominate the creek biota. However, some of these structures have historic /cultural significance, as well as local value.. One participant stated that a plan to remove Browndale Avenue Dam would certainly generate significant opposition. Other participants were hesitant to stop discussion of this concept for any of the structures without further study. One participant suggested that the acceptability of this practice would depend on what stream flows could be maintained, and it would not be desirable to trade the pools for a dry stream bed. All participants agreed that decisions regarding dam/weir removal are site specific agreed that further study of the impacts and opportunities would be needed before detailed recommendations could be given. Structures for more study include: Section B: Browndale Avenue Dam West 44t' Street grade control Louisiana Avenue and Meadowbrook Road grade controls Blake Road and Lake Street NE grade controls West 34'h Street weir 8/11/2005 12 FINAL DRAFT Section C: 54`h Street Weir Hiawatha Avenue Weir The CAC also developed a list of recommended criteria for decision makers to use when making decisions regarding dams and weirs. These criteria are presented below in the subsection titled Recommended Decision Criteria. Stream Flow Management Scenarios and Recommendations The CAC spent much time discussing the flow scenarios, and understood that the scenarios presented represented a first cut at what would happen with changes to the operation of the Grays Bay Dam. They understood that while the operational scenarios modeled did not show large benefits, they did show some benefits, and that there is the potential for an operational scenario that balances upstream and downstream uses. The CAC agreed to the following statement and recommendation: Targeting a sustained year round minimum flow is an integral part of achieving the vision of improving the aquatic life of Minnehaha Creek, and further study is recommended to find a means to optimize and/or balance year round minimum flows and other uses. Water Quality Management Recommendations The CAC developed the following water quality recommendations. ♦ Improve Stormwater Management by: • Reducing peak stormwater flows; • Reducing the discharge of contaminated stormwater using holding areas, wetlands, rainwater gardens and land use planning; • Repairing stormwater outfall that are currently causing erosion; and • Reducing stormwater contamination through the use of good house keeping types of best management practices, such as fertilizer ordinances and yard care practices that reduce pollutants at their source. ♦ Continue water quality monitoring in order to develop a baseline condition, identify problems and trends, and evaluate effectiveness of implementation efforts. ♦ Develop a "report card" for Minnehaha Creek to assist with communicating and evaluating the condition of the creek. ♦ Incorporate volunteers into monitoring efforts. Recommended Decision Criteria The CAC discussed issues with sediment removal from ponds and/or dam removal, and concluded that these are site specific - decisions. There were also remaining questions about where to start and how to prioritize actions, particularly stream bank restorations. The CAC, therefore, developed the following list of criteria for decision makers to use when making these types of decisions. 1. What is the cost? 2. What is the benefit and is there a benefit to aquatic life or streambank erosion reduction? 3. How severe is the problem? a. With respect to bank erosion, what is the bank stability rating for the project area? 8/11/2005 13 FINAL DRAFT 4. Who benefits and is there a public benefit? a. With respect to a sediment removal project, is the problem an aesthetic, a navigation, or an aquatic life problem? b. With respect to stream bank erosion control, is grade control sufficient? c. Is flow stabilized? 5. What is the cause of the problem, and is it an enforcement or a maintenance action, rather than a public improvement? 6. Will the action contribute to downstream impacts? 7. Will the action correct the source of the problem, or will systemic unresolved issues cause the problem to recur? a. With respect to a sediment removal project, are upstream sources of sediment controlled? 8. Is there public support? 9. Are there additional matching funds from partners and benefited parties? 10. Is the condition contributing to or causing other problems? 11. Can conditions be restored to an acceptable condition? a. With respect to dam removal, will stream flows be maintained so that the trade is not from an open water pond to a dry streambed? 12. Is the effort consistent with the CAC vision with respect to: a. Improving aquatic life, b. Controlling streambank erosion, c. Enhancing recreation, and d. Preserving cultural resources? 13. What is the expected life and what are the maintenance needs of the improvement? Other Recommendations Some CAC members were concerned that the goals developed were hard to measure, and the CAC did not define measurable outcomes. However, the CAC also recognized that their charge in this process was to come up with an overall vision, and that measurable outcomes could be developed, but that these would be technical and beyond the charge and background of a citizen group. The CAC, therefore, recommends that the Watershed District develop measurable outcomes for each goal. NEXT STEPS At the meeting of the Elected Officials on August 3, 2005 it was decided that each individual organization would review and approve the Vision developed by the CAC. Following the approval, each organization would adopt a joint - resolution officially acknowledging the role of the organization in the implementation of the Vision. At the time writing, only MCWD had adopted the draft resolution. On August 4, 2005, MCWD adopted the draft resolution presented to the group of Elected Officials the previous evening. MCWD plans to incorporate the overall Vision into its subwatershed planning for the Minnehaha Creek subwatershed and the overall Comprehensive Plan to be adopted for implementation starting in 2007. On July 28, 2005, the CAC, MCWD, and the USACE held an open house for the general public. The purpose of the open house was to present the draft CAC recommendations and receive feedback from the general public. Note: Add discussion of next steps from final meeting of the CAC. 8/11/2005 14 FINAL DRAFT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Citizens Advisory Committee Tom Aasen Judy Bridell Holly Buchanan Yvette Christianson Dennis Davidson Laura Huseby John Iacono Mary Karius Jeff Lee Scott Neiman David Oltmans Steve Pieh Helen Pitt Gao Pronove Robert Riesselman Suzi Rotering Jeffrey Ryan Robert Schroeder Jonathan Scott Glenn Strand Jack Sullivan James Thill Donna Woodruff Additional Participants Bill Allen Tom Balcom George Beck John Bradford Jim Calkins Jill Crafton Charles Hanson Alex Hooker Ari Hulbert Lee Keeley Jay Kidder Carol Kummer Joan Lawless Andy Lesch Paul Moldenhauer Josh Montgomery Chuck Pfannenstein Dan Salmon Bill Soules Elected Officials Mayor Karen Anderson, City of Minnetonka Councilmember Scott Benson, City of Minneapolis Manager Pamela Blixt, MCWD Commissioner Bob Fine, Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board Councilmember Scot Housh, City of Edina Commissioner Peter McLaughlin, Hennepin County Councilmember Susan Santa, City of St. Louis Park Councilmember Tony Wagner, City of Minnetonka (alternate) Technical Advisory Committee Mitchell Sawh, City of Minneapolis Wayne Houle, City of Edina Joel Settles, Hennepin County Julie Ekman, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Wayne Barstad, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Tim Brown, Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board Jennifer Posma, City of Minnetonka Tim Larson, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Jim Vaughan, City of St. Louis Park 8/11/2005 15 FINAL DRAFT Presenters Brian Nerbonne, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Jennifer Schaust, Hennepin County Jim Hafner, MCWD Lorin Hatch, MCWD Cecilio Olivier, FOR Stu Grubb, FOR Jodi Polzin, FOR Proiect Team Richard Beatty, USACE Kevin Bluhm, USACE Jodi Dutta, USACE Paul Nelson, HDR Jim Noren, USACE Dan Reinartz, USACE John Shyne, USACE Kenton Spading, USACE Michael Wyatt, MCWD 8/11/2005 16 RESOLUTION NO. 2005-76 A RESOLUTION City of Edina CREATING A MINNEHAHA CREEK VISIONING PARTNERSHIP WHEREAS, Minnehaha Creek is a highly valued stream flowing from Lake Minnetonka to the Mississippi River; and WHEREAS, the preservation and enhancement of the Minnehaha Creek Corridor is a high - priority expressed in the comprehensive plans for each of the cities along the Creek, and the Water Resources Management Plan of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District; and WHEREAS, urbanization in the Minnehaha Creek Watershed has led to the degradation of the stream's flow regime, habitat and water quality, but the Creek has high potential for restoration; and WHEREAS, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District completed in 2003 a detailed Hydrologic/Hydraulic and Pollutant Loading Study, and a Minnehaha Creek Stream Assessment; and WHEREAS the MCWD will undertake revisions to its Watershed Management Plan in partnership with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Feasibility Study to explore the potential federal interest for Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration and Flood Damage Reduction in the Minnehaha Creek Corridor; WHEREAS, the City of Edina desires to partner with the other communities along the Creek to seek protection and improvement of the Minnehaha Creek Corridor; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Edina supports the formation of a partnership to provide guidance and recommendations on policy development, technical issues, and public involvement to create a common vision and coordinated recommendation for the Minnehaha Creek Corridor, to be organized as follows: 1. Partnership Composition The partnership will comprise the following partners: • City of Minnetonka; • City of Hopkins; • City of St. Louis Park; • City of Edina; • City of Minneapolis; • Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board; • Hennepin County; and • Minnehaha Creek Watershed District City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET 1 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 2. Policy Board a. The partnership Policy Board will comprise a member of the governing body of each of the partner organizations. b. The Policy Board will generally meet quarterly as needed and pursuant to an established project schedule and work plan. 3. Technical Advisory Committee a. The Technical Advisory Committee will provide technical review and recommendations to the partnership and will comprise a staff representative from each of the partner organizations, and a representative from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Minnesota Department of Health and such other governmental agencies having a technical interest and expertise to offer for the benefit of the Minnehaha Creek Corridor. b. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District technical representative will serve as the Chair of the Technical Advisory Committee. c. The Technical Advisory Committee will generally meet monthly as needed pursuant to the established project work schedule and work plan. 4.. Public Advisory Committee a. The Public Advisory Committee will comprise two citizen representatives designated by each partner organization, and up to seven other representatives of stakeholder organizations named by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to represent conservation, property owner, development, and recreational interests in the Minnehaha Creek Watershed appointed by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed through an open application process. b. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District will designate one of its Board Members to serve as Chair to the Public Advisory Committee. c. The Public Advisory Committee will generally meet monthly as needed pursuant to the established project schedule and work plan. 5. Legal Authority It is understood that the decisions and activities of the partnership are advisory only, and will not have any binding legal authority on any of the partnership's members. The parties to the partnership expect that recommendations developed and approved by the partnership will be duly considered and acted upon by the governing body of the respective the partnership members. 2 6. Term The partnership will meet and work for an initial period of three (3) years, concluding on or before March 1, 2007, subject to a determination to renew the work of the partnership by each of its partner organizations. ATTEST: City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 6, 2005, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20 . City Clerk 3 RESOLUTION NO. 2005-77 A RESOLUTION City of Edina ADOPTING MINNEHAHA CREEK VISION Whereas, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and City of Edina previously adopted a resolution to create the Minnehaha Creek Visioning Partnership to provide guidance and recommendations on policy development, technical issues, and public involvement to create a common vision and implementation plan for the Minnehaha Creek Corridor; Whereas, the Partnership's Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC), comprised of 23 representatives from the cities of Minneapolis, Edina, St. Louis Park, Hopkins and Minnetonka, the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board, Hennepin County, and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, held twelve workshop meetings to develop a recommended creek vision; Whereas, the Partnership's Technical Advisory Committee also met to review the technical feasibility of the vision recommendations developed by the CAC, and has concluded that these recommendations are technically feasible; Whereas, the CAC also convened a public Open House to gather further public input and review of the proposed creek vision and the CAC's recommendations; Whereas, the CAC has now produced a detailed report that sets forth a creek vision as follows: The Vision for Minnehaha Creek includes both an existing and desired sense of place. With respect to the existing sense of place, the creek: Is a corridor with various reaches and destinations, Serves as a gathering place for people, Provides recreational opportunities, Is a contemporary cultural resource, yet it also reflects our history, and Provides natural and aesthetic experiences unique to its setting. Within the creek corridor it is also desired to: Provide balanced opportunities to experience the creek, Improve the natural environment, Improve water quality, Have variation and physical differences, and Be reflective of our history and a priority for our future. Whereas, the CAC's creek vision recommendations also include management priorities, streambank erosion improvements, aquatic habitat management, riparian vegetation management, woody debris management, study of weir and dam removal, stream flow management, water quality management, and decision making criteria; and City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET 1 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 Whereas, the CAC's creek vision recommendations will be considered by both the MCWD and the USACE as they move forward with plans and designs, and it is also intended as guidance for other organizations, such as cities and the Minneapolis Park Board, which share creek corridor management responsibilities, with the hope is that all organizations can work together toward a common vision for the creek; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina hereby adopts the general creek vision recommendations presented by the CAC as the general conceptual framework to guide creek corridor management, and thanks the 23 citizen members of the CAC for their hard work, thorough study, and carefully- considered recommendations; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Edina supports the inclusion of these recommendations in the Water Resources Management Plan being developed by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Edina agrees to continue to work with the other members of the Minnehaha Creek Visioning Partnership, through its policy board, technical advisory committee, and citizens advisory committee, to coordinate the implementation of these recommendations; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Edina hereby expresses its support for the United States Army Corps of Engineers Feasibility Study within the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to pursue the investigation of the potential Federal interest in assisting with the implementation of Minnehaha Creek Visioning Partnership recommendations in the Minnehaha Creek corridor. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 6, 2005, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_. City Clerk 2 Purpose: Develop a set of recommendations for the long-term management of Minnehaha Creek which incorporates local landowner and citizen user input related to values associated with the creek. Drivers: MCWD Comprehensive Plan revisions USACE Feasibility Study o EPA /MNPCA Impaired Waters . Program 12 September 2005 �fiunehaha Creek `i%tepSbed DIStCICt Improving Quality of Water, QurtIity or Life o Goals - Overarching policies o Objectives — Measurable outcomes ° Programmatic CIP 12 September 2005 Miunehaha Creek '1' Watershed District Improving Quality ( Water, Quality 4Life � r-3 M IANAIII !$ I` , t 1" , Rif �. • Goal: Reduce the frequency of flooding 12 September 2005 Minnehaha Creek �t -- Watershed District Slinnehaha Creed : i� � Watershed District e Objective: Eliminate property damage associated with any storm event less than a 10- year frequency (4.5 ") Improving Qualityt f Water, Quality of Life • Set loading limits to surface waters (Total Maximum Daily Load approach) • Establish peak hydrographs (runoff rates) for subwatershed Create a 10 -year Capital Improvements Program o Set education goals /strategies for subwatershed o Other subwatershed- specific solutions tailored to meet identified goals and objectives 12 September 2005 bf nnebaba Greek - Watershed District Improving Quality of Water, Quality of Life Six Mile Creek Management S * Example Management Strategy (Flooding): o Create 45 acre -feet of ponding capacity with the subwatershed - increase upstream stormwater retention time * Assist cities in updating storm sewer to minimum 10 -year capacity * Promote infiltration of stormwater, where feasible * Provide detailed floodplain mapping to local cities Regulate floodplain encroachment Educate local officials about flooding concerns through NEMO program 7.2 September 2005 :.. ilionehaha.Creek _W41-M 1 Watershed Distrid Inrprozu ,� Quality Water, Quality of Gifu 72 September 2005 1ar=Ctl - - Minnehaha Creek Subwatershed Plan Visioning Partnership USACE Feasibility Study Ifinnehaha Creek 1j. Watershed District E, Improving Quality c f Water, Quality of Life: Ilm In "I I �O TIM. -1 111!, 11cl-TIVIVC-1 Three levels of involvement: 1. Elected Officials Z. Apointeci Citizens 3. Technical Comr��it�tec -; Partners: • Minnetonkm • Hopkins • St, Louis Park • Edina Minneapolis Minneapof is ('arf< & Recreation Board 0 !- iennein County MCWM 12 September 2005 �ilunehaha CP80k ��- Wat�CShB� �ISC�ICt Improving Qual�itil c f Water, Qualitq of Life u Lft ,: ski 1 l `I !91 k 9- ► l Ll I -i OGIC ' M M1 Explores political feasibility of recommendations Invitation to attend a Citizen Advisory Committee Meeting convened to review Citizen recommendations Submits final recommendation to governing boards 12 September 2005 Hinnehaha Creek Watershed District Improving Quality (f Water, Quality of Life [0- -. Nominated by project partners - two per partner, nine by MCWD� 23 total Develops recommendations and Vision • Explores social feasibility of recommendations • 'thirteen meetings total 12 September 2005 Hinnebala CreekM Creek ' Watershed Diskid Improving QuaIity cf Water, Qualihl t f Life Consists of technical representatives of each of the project partners in addition to representatives from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Pollution Control Agency, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Explores technical feasibility of recommended actions, provides comments, revises plans and plan alternatives o Convenes on as needed basis 72 September 2005 6linnehaha Creed Watershed DiSlpiCt lmproz)hkg Quality c f Water, Quality of Life Minnehaha Creek Watershed District ; .•.: s -I- p —ing Qua hy. ofwd— Q,-h y afLfa US Army of En ine Minnehaha Creek Visioning Partnership Recommendations 1 -10- S1,11 _ JJ Figure 1: Minnehaha Creek Visioning Prioritization Results L u 25 20 a 15 c 10 e� 5 0 Aquatic Canoeing Passive Physical Life Recreation Condition (streambank) Value / Criteria Figure 2: Minnehaha Creek Visioning Ordinal Ranking Results 0 250 200 0 150 100 a 50 0 o0 d G4 d V w IWO CL O Value /Criteria Aesthetic Flood Appearance Damage and Safety G ra 0 y I w ix W co y d R� 0 U Alinnebaha Creek Watershed District ; .•. ; j Gxp—ling' -w-gty oflE'a— Quality of Lift US Army Corps of Engineers Minnehaha Creek Visioning Partnership Recommendations UMITINGCONIDITIONS I '1iinnehaha Creek Watershed Uishict i r -,*—ng Q—/"y of WI— QruGty afGfr US Army Corps of Engineers Minnehaha Creek Visioning Partnership Recommendations The CAC recommends the following overall vision. The Vision for Minnehaha Creek includes both an existing and desired sense of place. With respect to the existing sense of place, the creek: 4- Is a corridor with various reaches and destinations, Serves as a gathering place for people, 4- Provides recreational opportunities, Is a contemporary cultural resource, yet it also reflects our history, and Provides natural and aesthetic experiences unique to its setting. Within the creek corridor it is also desired to: -k- Provide balanced opportunities to experience the creek, 4- Improve the natural environment, Improve water quality, J = have variation aid physical differences, and Be reflective of our history and aupriority for our future. Alinnehaha Greek Watershed District /-proving Q-1-7 -f' a— QaaGry ofLlfs Minnehaha Creek Visioning Partnership Recommendations I J- III, ii�i�- ��i;1, 1! � V a i11 N, 111,11, #- Erosion .4- Aquatic Habitat � Riparian Management 4 Water Quality 4 Stream Flow -J�- Decision Criteria US Army Corps of Engineers Miunehaha Creek Watershed District ; .•. hx'p—Ing Q-1"Y of Warn. Q ""Y afUfr US Army Corps of Engineers Minnehaha Creek Visioning Partnership Recommendations '1��- U111M IM1,1/1 d I NI0111 11�� - Streambank Erosion Recommend a preference for stabilization technologies that incorporate vegetation (i.e., bioengineering technologies over rip -rap, retaining walls, and other forms of artificial stabilization). -4In- stream Habitat Recommend indirectly managing in- stream habitat by managing riparian vegetation and encouraging the retention of woody debris. Woody Debris Section A recommendation: Given the wetland like characteristics of this section woody debris probably was not a significant historic factor. Thus, there is no recommendation to actively manage woody debris. :Sections Band Crecommendations: Woody debris provides an important habitat benefit and should be encouraged. However, it should be = removed /managed where it creates obstructions to canoeing and potentially ,� � _,�w= impacts floodmg.� Minnehaha Creek In Watershed District z /-proving Q-1hy ofLYd— Q,-V yafUfe US Army Corps of Engineers Minnehaha Creek Visioning Partnership Recommendations #- Develop a community and organizational philosophy that values minimal impact approaches for both citizen and public works activities within the riparian corridor by: Establishing a more natural riparian buffer to serve as a source of woody debris, wildlife habitat, and a separation from urban uses: Encouraging the establishment of a natural buffer that enhances streambank stability; Encouraging native plant species; and Controlling invasive plant species. IL Create incentives for good /positive practices and for the use of native vegetation through tax credits, cost sharing, and availability of free seeds /plants and technical assistance. 4� Use marketing, promotional, public relations, social pressure and education efforts to foster a change in expectations and behavior that embraces a more natural/native riparian environment. 41 Develop and maintain a shared implementation vision for the riparian corridor by: - Communicating the vision of the committee to decision makers, Maintaining the investment through on-going maintenance of restoration efforrts y - coordination, and Improvmganter governmehf, , rdinat' n, a _. r . .,ry.. ,Completmgperodic `progress re *.sews. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District : • ; "-P— 4-g Q— ry ofIr-- Q"WhV of Lift US Army Corps of Engineers Minnehaha Creek Visioning Partnership Recommendations The CAC developed the following water quality recommendations. 4- Improve Stormwater Management by: Reducing peak stormwater flows; Reducing the discharge of contaminated stormwater using holding areas, wetlands, rainwater gardens and land use planning; Repairing stormwater outfall that are currently causing erosion; and, Reducing stormwater contamination through the use of good house keeping types of best management practices, such as fertilizer ordinances and yard care practices that reduce pollutants at their source. 4 Continue water quality monitoring in order to develop a baseline condition, identify problems and trends, and evaluate effectiveness of implementation efforts. Develop.: -a report card for Minnehaha Creek to assist with communicating an evaluating the:condition of the creek. r Incorpoirate vglunteers�into monitoring ;efforts. Miunehaha Creek Watershed District Q,-L;7 of Life US Army Corps of Engineers Minnehaha Creek Visioning Partnership Recommendations I I " !71 IN; Targeting a sustained. year-round minimum flow is an integral part of achieving the ma p mV s ,*qpta life cif 'Minne ,: C -�104- is recommended, to find 3linnehalia Creek s 11'atershed )isftict. /-proving Qua/iry -f 'W-- QneGry -f Lift US Army Corps of Engineers Minnehaha Creek Visioning Partnership Recommendations 1. What is the cost? 2. What is the benefit and is there a benefit to aquatic life or streambank erosion reduction? 3. How severe is the problem? With respect to bank erosion, what is the bank stability rating for the project area? 4. Who benefits and is there a public benefit? With respect to a sediment removal project, is the problem an aesthetic, a navigation, or an aquatic life problem? With respect to stream bank erosion control, is grade control sufficient? Is flow stabilized? 5. What is the cause of the problem, and is it an enforcement or a maintenance action, rather than a public improvement? 6. Will the action contribute to downstream impacts? 7. Will the action correct the source of the problem, or will systemic unresolved issues cause the problem to recur? With respect to sediment removal projects, are upstream sources of sediment controlled? 8. Is there public support? 9. Are there additional matching funds from partners and benefited parties? 10. Is the condition contributing to or causing other problems? 11. Can conditions be restored to an acceptable condition? With respect to dam removal, will stream flows be maintained so that the trade is not from an open water pond to a dry streambed? 12. Is the effort consistent with the CAC vision with respect to: Improving aquatic -,hfe, w Controlling streambank erosion, Enhancing recreation, and n Preserving cultural,resources? 13. What, is the expected n and what are the ma ntenance needs of the improvement? i A pa r! "* F;.11 �j ........... :Av J, I • Develop Subwatershed Plan for Minnehaha Creek • Identify Capital Improvements and Programmatic solutions to address issues and recommended Vision 12 September 2005 Hinnehaha Creek = Watershed District Improving Quality of Water, Quality of Life Z �rf �=rit ) r;-; o Adopt resolution c Verify commitment to future coordination III! III lip "]2 September 2005 blmnebaba Creek Watershed District Improving Quality of Water, Quality of Life, - � �h l ,l �ili1 �h I'�I �h 1.����1 ;�J �I� i,,� � � �'�I [I�►� o Reiteration of the general Vision and recommendations ,'am Future coordination on implementation of Vision Support for USACE in completion of the Feasibility Study within MCWD 12 _September 2005 �flnnehaha Creed Watershed District Improving Quality of Water, Quality of Life '77, v ` a T. Watershed Education (Meetings 1 -4) 40 Goal: Inform and educate the general group on relevant issues concerning existing and future conditions of the watershed 0 Outcome: Group will be prepared to evaluate existing MCWD information and make an informed recommendation regarding the MCWD role in managing area resources 2. Watershed Scenarios (Meetings 5 -8) Goal: Present and discuss different scenarios of watershed management Outcome: Development of a preliminary plan for review by Technical Committee 3. Final flan Development (Meetings 9 -12) Goal: Review and revise technical recommendations Outcome: Final Plan recommendation for presentation to elected officials 12 September 2005 Ilinnehaha Creek Watershed District Improving Quality of Water, Quality of l,if J Upper Mississippi River Basin Reconnaissance Study Feasibility Study Federal Interest: Economic, Environmental 12 September 2005 6linnehaha Creek . Watershed District Improving Quality of Water, QualitY of life 8/17/2005 13:19:44 Page - 1 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION 53.20 PERMIT REFUND 118105 ED034896 1495.4110 HEATING & VENTING LICENSE S 53.20 R55CKREG LOG20000 275380 8 /18/2005 CITY OF EDINA 111228 ALDEN POOL & MUNICIPAL SUPPLY Council Check Register 2,329.69 PUMPS, VALVES 117923 500473 5915.6530 8/18/2005 -- 8/1812005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 275376 8118/2005 102403 AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT 99.46 DIRT 118213 22112 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5952.6183 RECYCLING CHARGES 99.46 DIRT 118214 21922 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 198.92 275382 8/18/2005 103357 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO 275377 8/1812005 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 119.82 DVD'S 118216 44.84 1120.6406 118133 458535 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 119.82 49.46 118134 458536 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 8118/2005 37.96 118135 466284 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 481.44 76.12 118062 118136 458538 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 47.40 118137 466187 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX CITY HALL GENERAL 23.56 91.80 118138 456816 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX LAUNDRY YORK OCCUPANCY 53.40 118347 466185 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 83.08 118348 466286 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 31.56 118349 466192 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 447.38 275378 8118/2005 102626 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES 650.82 READY MIX 118009 4121585 1314.6520 CONCRETE 1,128.48 READY MIX 118010 4121160 1314.6520 CONCRETE 1,779.30 275379 8/1812005 118622 AIR CONDITIONING ASSOC. 8/17/2005 13:19:44 Page - 1 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION 53.20 PERMIT REFUND 118105 ED034896 1495.4110 HEATING & VENTING LICENSE INSPECTIONS 53.20 275380 8 /18/2005 111228 ALDEN POOL & MUNICIPAL SUPPLY 2,329.69 PUMPS, VALVES 117923 500473 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 2,329.69 275381 8/18/2005 100058 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #894 33,874.00 RECYCLING 118215 152705 5952.6183 RECYCLING CHARGES RECYCLING 33,874.00 275382 8/18/2005 103357 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO 119.82 DVD'S 118216 INV61968 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 119.82 275383 8118/2005 101115 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER 481.44 118062 6200 -7/05 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 428.98 118063 46 -7/05 1551.6201 LAUNDRY CITY HALL GENERAL 91.80 118064 35320 -7/05 5841.6201 LAUNDRY YORK OCCUPANCY R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8117/2005 13:19:44 Council Check Register Pager 2 8/18/2005 — 8/18/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 93.48 118065 35314 -7105 5861.6201 LAUNDRY VERNON OCCUPANCY 35.53 118066 35334 -7/05 5821.6201 LAUNDRY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 62.24 118067 59056 -7/05 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 208.85 118340 16813 -7/05 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL 1,402.32 275384 811812005 102171 ANDERSON • JOHNSON ASSOCIATES 1,858.70 PROJECT MGMT FEES 118106 050540705 47036.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT RENOVATE BRAEMAR PARK FIELD 1,858.70 275385 811812005 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING 118.21 SPRINKLER REPAIR 118287 8269 01321.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA -321 VALLEY VIEW - WOODDALE 1,959.57 SPRINKLER REPAIR 118288 8395 01321.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA -321 VALLEY VIEW - WOODDALE 2,077.78 275386 8/1812005 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. 31.89 DPD POWDER 117924 27311 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 224.73 CHLORINE, ACID 118217 27320 5620.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH PARK 256.62 275387 8/1812005 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 198.04 COFFEE 118107 6013 - 489515 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 198.04 275388 8//812005 106304 ASPEN MILLS 1,183.27 SAFETY VESTS 118289 62363 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,183.27 275389 8/18/2005 101155 AUTOMATIC GARAGE DOOR & FIREPIL 213.93 DOOR REPAIRS 117925 1298445 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 120.00 DOOR REPAIRS 117926 1306385 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 333.93 275390 8/18/2005 103708 AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS CO. 270.00 WELL REPAIR 117927 16884 5911.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER 270.00 275391 8/18/2005 101428 AWWA 180.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 118108 080105 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 180.00 275392 8/18/2005 100638 BACHMAN'S R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/18/2005 -- 8/18/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 79.82 118341 072005 5400.2072 MEN'S CLUB 412.09 118341 072005 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES 419.67 118341 072005 5422.6275 COURSE BEAUTIFICATION 586.82 118341 072005 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5842.5513 5842.5515 5842.5512 5842.5513 5822.5515 5822.5513 5862.5512 5862.5515 5862.5513 5862.5513 5110.6103 5620.6180 5510.6513 1552.6530 1552.6530 1400.6513 5862.6406 5862.6406 5862.6406 1628.4392.07 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OR GOODS SOLD WINE. COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 8/17/2005 13:19:44 Page = . 3 Business Unit GOLF BALANCE SHEET TREES & MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL STORM SEWER YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK OFFICE SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR TRIPS ARENA ADMINISTRATION CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING SENIOR CITIZENS 1,498.40 275393 8/18/2005 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 515.00 118139 34669900 163.24 118140 40336700 2,046.21 118141 34152400 303.00 118142 34152500 64.65 118143 40340700 365.00 118144 34163000 88.95 118350 34203200 74.65 118351 40360900 166.00 118352 34203100 718.00 118353 33900700 4,504.70 275394 8118/2005 100661 BENN, BRADLEY 204.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 118098 081005 204.00 275395 8/18/2005 118632 BENYO, KELLEY 300.00 PLANTER BED CONSTRUCTION 118218 081105 300.00 275396 8/18/2005 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 122.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES 117928 4050140 27.02 TAPE DISPENSERS 118011 4083500 6.75- CREDIT 118012 CM4083500 305.63 LABELS /FOLDERS 118219 OE -729 -1 80.84 LABELS, CORK PANEL 118220 4054650 277.41- RETURN 118221 CM4050920 638.60 OFFICE SUPPLIES 118222 4050920 889.93 275397 8/18/2005 116686 BEVIER, JEANNE 48.00 TRIP REFUND 118223 081105 48.00 275398 8/18/2005 101676 BIFFS INC 5842.5513 5842.5515 5842.5512 5842.5513 5822.5515 5822.5513 5862.5512 5862.5515 5862.5513 5862.5513 5110.6103 5620.6180 5510.6513 1552.6530 1552.6530 1400.6513 5862.6406 5862.6406 5862.6406 1628.4392.07 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OR GOODS SOLD WINE. COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 8/17/2005 13:19:44 Page = . 3 Business Unit GOLF BALANCE SHEET TREES & MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL STORM SEWER YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK OFFICE SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR TRIPS ARENA ADMINISTRATION CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING SENIOR CITIZENS R55CKREG LOG20000 505.51 CITY OF EDINA 275399 8/18/2005 Council Check Register 100653 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS 8/18/2005 -- 8/1812005 66,284.54 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 169.97 RESTROOM RENTAL 118013 W263576 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 23.72 RESTROOM RENTAL 118014- W263579 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 259.53 RESTROOM RENTAL 118015 W263580 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 52.29 RESTROOM RENTAL 118016 W263581 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 10074.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 10074.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES 1470.6510 1642.6542 5125.6103 5110.6564 5110.6103 03417.1705.30 04310.1705.30 01326.1705.30 05441.1705.30 FIRST AID SUPPLIES INFIELD MIXTURE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CRAFT SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS -CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 8/17/2005 13:19:44 Page - 4 Business Unit FIELD MAINTENANCE FIELD MAINTENANCE FIELD MAINTENANCE FIELD MAINTENANCE SIDEWALK W 70TH W SHORE TO 100 SIDEWALK W 70TH W SHORE TO 100 SENIOR CITIZENS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIELD MAINTENANCE MEDIA STUDIO ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION SS SUNNYSLOPE WOODHILL STS -310 SUNNYSLOPE AREA IMPROV SUNNYSLOPE ST RECLAIM WM SUNNYSLOPE WOODHILL 505.51 275399 8/18/2005 100653 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS 66,284.54 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.3 118295 081905 66,284.54 275400 8/18/2005 100653 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS 17,918.89 FINAL PAYMENT 118296 AUG 19 17,918.89 275401 8118/2005 118326 BLOOMINGTON CIVIC THEATER 580.00 SEPT 17 SHOW -FINAL PMT 118224 081105 580.00 275402 8118/2005 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 50.94 OXYGEN FITTINGS 118290 50146748 56.94 275403 8/18/2005 100669 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC. 443.15 AG -LIME 118017 073105 443.15 275404 8/18/2005 117405 BUNKERT, DENISE 120.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 118101 081005 120.00 275405 8/1812005 105315 CALTON, BOB 159.11 CRAFT SUPPLIES 118099 081005, 200.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 118284 081205 359.11 275406 8118/2005 115857 CARL BOLANDER & SONS CO. 14,331.13 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 118291. 081905 25,375.92 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 118291 081905 30,724.90 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 118291 081905 72,180.05 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 118291 081905 1 142,612.00 10074.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 10074.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES 1470.6510 1642.6542 5125.6103 5110.6564 5110.6103 03417.1705.30 04310.1705.30 01326.1705.30 05441.1705.30 FIRST AID SUPPLIES INFIELD MIXTURE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CRAFT SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS -CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 8/17/2005 13:19:44 Page - 4 Business Unit FIELD MAINTENANCE FIELD MAINTENANCE FIELD MAINTENANCE FIELD MAINTENANCE SIDEWALK W 70TH W SHORE TO 100 SIDEWALK W 70TH W SHORE TO 100 SENIOR CITIZENS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIELD MAINTENANCE MEDIA STUDIO ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION SS SUNNYSLOPE WOODHILL STS -310 SUNNYSLOPE AREA IMPROV SUNNYSLOPE ST RECLAIM WM SUNNYSLOPE WOODHILL Subledger Account Description Business Unit REPAIR PARTS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER REPAIR PARTS 8/17/2005 13:19:44 Page - 5 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ED ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 275410 8/18/2005 103711 CENTERPOINT ENERGY GAS SERVICE - R55CKREG LOG20000 8,518.98 118226 CITY OF EDINA 5311.6186 HEAT POOL OPERATION 154.43 Council Check Register 1157522 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 496.95 8/18/2005 - 8/18/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 275407 8118/2005 100679 CARLSON TRACTOR & EQUIPMENT 275411 8/18/2005 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 306.18 CUTTERBARS, WHEELS 118018- S10794 1553.6530 9.72 306.18 118069 080105 5821.6186 275408 8/18/2005 9.72 117800 CARLSON, JOHN 118069 080105 5841.6186 HEAT 150.00 PERFORMANCE 8/23/05 118225 080105 5610.6136 080105 5422.6186 150.00 MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 25.46 275409 8/18/2005 5861.6186 100681 CATCO VERNON OCCUPANCY 26.22 118069 147.36 END COVER 117929 3 -81724 1553.6530 37.81 147.36 080105 1552.6186 HEAT Subledger Account Description Business Unit REPAIR PARTS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER REPAIR PARTS 8/17/2005 13:19:44 Page - 5 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ED ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 275410 8/18/2005 103711 CENTERPOINT ENERGY GAS SERVICE - 8,518.98 118226 1157532 5311.6186 HEAT POOL OPERATION 154.43 118227 1157522 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 496.95 118228 1156932 5620.6186 HEAT EDINBOROUGH PARK 9,170.36 275411 8/18/2005 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 9.72 118069 080105 5821.6186 HEAT 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 9.72 118069 080105 5841.6186 HEAT YORK OCCUPANCY 18.95 118069 080105 5422.6186 HEAT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 25.46 118069 080105 5861.6186 HEAT VERNON OCCUPANCY 26.22 118069 080105 5430:6186 HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 37.81 118069 080105 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 54.01 118069 080105 5210.6186 HEAT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 56.53 118069 080105 1481.6186 HEAT YORK FIRE STATION 97.98 118069 080105 5630.6186 HEAT CENTENNIAL LAKES 124.81 118069 080105 5420.6186 HEAT CLUB HOUSE 189.43 118069 080105 1470.6186 HEAT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 200.54 118069 080105 1628.6186 HEAT SENIOR CITIZENS 280.48 118069 080105 5111.6186 HEAT ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 377.12 118069 080105 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 418.33 118069 080105 5913.6186 HEAT DISTRIBUTION 893.09 118069 080105 5911.6186 HEAT PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER 4,982.23 118069 080105 5511.6186 HEAT ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 7,802.43 275412 8/18/2005 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 12,058.75 223 - 6226 - 345 -47 -23 CONTRACT 118008 080105 4204.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HEALTH ALERT NETWORK 12,058.75 CITY OF EDINA 8/17/2005 13:19:44 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 6 8/18/2005 8/18/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit . 275413 811812005 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 255.61 ELECTRIC BILLING 118019 2655, 5932.6185 LIGHT & POWER GENERAL STORM SEWER 255.61 275414 811812005 100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP. 1,910.00 MOBILE AIR CART 118109 45324A 1480.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SPECIAL OPERATIONS 38,888.00 RESPIRATORY EQUIPMENT 118110 45324 1480.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SPECIAL OPERATIONS 40,798.00 275415 6118/2005 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 113.57 GLOVES, TAPE 117930 02629381 1301.6610. SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 68.57 BEE STING RELIEF 118229 02633299 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 182.14 275416 8/18/2005 100697 COOL AIR MECHANICAL 374.40 REPAIR PUMP 117931 54387 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 374.40 275417 8/18/2005 100698 COPY EQUIPMENT 171.85 PAINT 118292 63390 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 171.85 275418 8/18/2005 118633 CORBAN GROUP, THE 2,940.00 RFP CONSULTING 118230 2005 -801 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,940.00 275419 8/1812005 100513 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES IN 2,742.38 CUSTODIAL SERVICES 118293 98641 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 2,742.38 275420 8/18/2005 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 32.59 114 - 09855685 -4 117932 527382 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 32.59 275421 8/18/2005 114148 D VINE WINE DISTRIBUTORS 224.40 118354 2843, 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 224.40 275422 8/18/2005 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING 1,728.48 118145 325731 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 40.60 118146 325732 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 19.80 118355 325730 F- 5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING T . l R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/17/2005 13:19:44 Council Check Register Page - 7 8/18/2005 8118/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,626.95 118356 325729 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5610.6575 PRINTING ED ADMINISTRATION 1120.4314 INVESTIGATION FEE ADMINISTRATION . 1627.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 01321.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA -321 VALLEY VIEW - WOODDALE 5311.6545 CHEMICALS 3,415.83 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 275423 8118/2005 WATER TREATMENT 111120 DESIGN N PRINT WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES 1,550.29 ADVENTURE PEAK BROCHURES 118231 31215 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 1,550.29 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 275424 8118/2005 118627 DINO'S OF EDINA 53.66 DEPOSIT REFUND 118111 DEP 6-9 53.66 275425 8/18/2005 101766 DISPLAY SALES 124.61 DECORATIONS 118294 INVO036566 124.61 275426 8/18/2005 118638 DOGWATCH OF THE TWIN CITIES 385.00 DOG FENCE REPAIR 118297 072005 385.00 275427 8/18/2005 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES 624.01 CAUSTIC SODA . 117933. 82701055 -05 912.58 CHLORINE, CAUSTIC SODA 117934 82701059 -05 2,608.79 CHEMICALS 117935 82701015 -05 4,586.92 CHEMICALS 117936 82700997 -05 2,608.79 CHEMICALS 118232 82701064 -05 11,341.09 275428 8/18/2005 100739 EAGLE WINE 676.32 118147 274087 2,621.16 118357 274011 834.76 118358 274083 4,132.24 275429 8/18/2005 100741. EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 5,704.70 118148 327072 600.00 118149 609227 - 4,867.30 118150 326979 74.50 118151 326978 2,422.95 118359 327061 13,669.45 275430 8/18/2005 105294 EKLUND MULCH SALES 5610.6575 PRINTING ED ADMINISTRATION 1120.4314 INVESTIGATION FEE ADMINISTRATION . 1627.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 01321.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA -321 VALLEY VIEW - WOODDALE 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/17/2005 13:19:44 Council Check Register - Page - 8 8/18/2005 - 8/18/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 830.09 WOOD MULCH 118020 216 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 830.09 275431 8118/2005 101749 ENERGY MANAGEMENT INC. 370.40 COOLING TOWER TREATMENT 117937 007498 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 370.40 275432 8/1812005 105339 ENRGI 403.99 STOCK ART /PHOTOGRAPHY 118233 3166 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 260.00 WEBSITE CONSULTING 118234 3154 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 528.98 STOCK ART /PHOTOGRAPHY 118235 3140 2210.6406. GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 1,192.97 275433 8/18/2005 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 128.00 118360 332307 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 128.00 275434 8118/2005 100297 FAST FOTO & DIGITAL 31.95 PHOTO PROCESSING 118112 T2- 208734 2210.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS - 31.95 275435 8/18/2005 100756 FEDERAL EXPRESS 33.44 SHIPPING CHARGES 118236 3 -949 -53138 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 33.44 275436 8/18/2005 101432 FERRELLGAS 12.78 L.P. FUEL RENTAL 118237 RNT239207 5521.6581 GASOLINE ARENA ICE MAINT 12.78 275437 8/1812005. 105420 FIKES SERVICES 34.08 AIR DEODORIZERS 118238 572750 5841.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS YORK OCCUPANCY 34.08 275438 8118/2005 102015 FLOWERS OF EDINA 42.60 FLOWER ARRANGEMENT 118298 2860 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 42.60 275439 8118/2005 118630 FOWLER, MARTIN 90.00 CRAFT SUPPLIES 118100 081005 5125.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES . MEDIA STUDIO 385.00 MODEL 118100 081005 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 475.00 I R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/17/2005 13:19:44 Council Check Register Page - 9 8/18/2005 - 8/18/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 275440 8/18/2005 101022 FRAME, SUSAN 124.27 CRAFT SUPPLIES 118096 081005 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 900.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 118096 061005 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,024.27 275441 811812005 100457 FRASIER, SCOTT 125.00 PERFORMANCE 8/31/05 118239 080105 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 125.00 275442 8/18/2005 118456 FULTON, LAURA 94.37 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 118113 080805 2210.6107 MILEAGE -OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 94.37 275443 8/18/2005 100764 G & K SERVICES 56.52 118068 073105 5511.6201 LAUNDRY ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 166.36 118068 073105 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 327.67 118068 073105 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 422.06 118068 073105 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 486.40 118068 073105 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING- MAINTENANCE 559.76 118068 073105 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE - 2,018.77 275444 8/18/2005 106409 GANS, JEFF 1,900.00 LIGHT TUBES INSTALLATION 118114 687 5101.8020 DONATIONS ART CENTER REVENUES 1,900.00 275445 8/18/2005 100920 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY - MINNEA 275.07 PARTS 118021 073105 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 275.07 275446 8/18/2005 102169 GOODWIN, DON 150.00 PERFORMANCE 8/21/05 118240 080105 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 275447 811812005 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC. 1,244.70 JULY SERVICE 117938 5070312 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 1,244.70 275448 8/1812005 100781 GRAFIX SHOPPE 480.00 REFLECTIVE EMBLEMS 118299 42520 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 480.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 275449 8/1812005 Amount Supplier/ Explanation COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 101103 GRAINGER 112.25 FOAM TAPE 19.49 FUSES 217.77 BATTERIES, WASP SPRAY 71.88 FUSES, GLOVES 421.39 117940 275450 8/18/2005 CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR Council Check Register 1,458.50 8/18/2005 -- 8/18/2005 PO # Doc No . Inv No Account No 117939 495 -408514 -0 1301.6406 117940 498 - 760277 -0 5511.6406 117941 495 - 174164 -6 1301.6406 118241 498 - 437833 -3 5511.6406 275450 8/18/2005 102670 GRAND PERE WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,458.50 YORK SELLING 118361 00013633 1,458.50 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 275451 8118/2005 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 183.50 YORK SELLING 118152 74699 1,854.75 50TH ST SELLING 118362 74697 1,238.75 VERNON SELLING 118363 74698 3,277.00 275452 8118/2005 101350 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO. 426.76 SERVICE/REPAIRS 118022 051487 600.00 SPRINKLER REPAIR 118300 051841 129.62 SPRINKLER REPAIR 118301 051988 204.93 SPRINKLER REPAIR 118302 051978 1,361.31 275453 8/18/2005 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 7,775.96 .85 .85 2.55 132.54 4,692.59 115.00- 61.08- 4.93- 937.55 33.50 34.10 95.69 13,525.17 118153 274089 118154 273839 118155 273842 118156 273847 118157 274088 118158 268883 118159 672313 118160 . 672178 118161 672593 118364 274084 118365 274085 118366 274008 118367 274079 5862.5513 5842.5513 5862.5513 5822.5513 1301.6180 01202.1705.30 01204.1705.30 01204.1705.30 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5515 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5515 5822.5512 5822.5515 5862.5515 5862.5515 275454 8/1812005 102426 HALE, WILLIAM '0.00 PERFORMANCE 8/25/05 118242 080105 6136 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/17/2005 13:19:44 Page - 10 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GENERAL MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING GENERAL MAINTENANCE HALIFAX - GRIMES STREET RECON BROOKVIEW - 52 TO 54 RECLAIM BROOKVIEW - 52 TO 54 RECLAIM COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/18/2005 — 8/1812005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 150.00 275455 8/18 /2005 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS 111.72 REGISTER PAPER, FILM 117942 242936 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 117.04 REGISTER PAPER 118243 242960 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 228.76 275456 8/18/2005 103314 HARDRNES INC. 3,588.01 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO, 11 118303 081905 04296.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 4,253.34 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 11 118303 081905 03412.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 17,666.30 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 11 118303 081905 05432.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 75,839.88 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 11 118303 081905 01205.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 190,827.72 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 11 118303 081905 01321.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 292,175.25 275457 8/18/2005 102618 HARDWOOD CREEK LUMBER INC 600.61 LATHES & HUBS 118304 6223 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 201.39 LATHES & HUBS 118305 6259 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 802.00 275458 8/1812005 118628 HARTNET, JANE LARSON 455.00 ART WORK SOLD.AT EAC 118094 080405 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 455.00 275459 811812005 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION 1,533.38 RADIO ADMIN FEE 117943 25078013 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 178.30 RADIO ADMIN FEE 117944 25078072 1553.6237 RADIO SERVICE 46.00 TRANSACTION PROCESSING 118023 25077188 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING 48.51 TRANSACTION PROCESSING 118023 25077188 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 1,688.59 RADIO LEASE 118306 25078012, 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 3,494.78 275460 811812005 104332 HILL, PRISCILLA 1,365.00 INSTRUCTOR AC. 118103 081005 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,365.00 275461 8/18/2005 100605 HIRSHFIELD'S 75.85 PAINTING SUPPLIES 118244 003100189 .5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 75.85 275462 8/18/2005 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURI 8/17/2005 13:19:44 Page - 11 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VALLEY VIEW WOODDALE STORM VALLEY VIEW WOODDALE SANITARY VALLEY VIEW WOODDALE WATERMAIN WOODDALE - 56 TO VV RECLAIM BA -321 VALLEY VIEW - WOODDALE ENGINEERING GENERAL ENGINEERING GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT. OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ASSESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION EDINSOROUGH PARK 463.28 FIELD MARKING PAINT 118307 68631 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER - FIELD MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/18/2005 — 8/18/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 463.28 275463 8/18/2005. 118506 HODGES, LAUREN 345.05 INSTRUCTOR AC 118285 081205 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8/17/2005 13:19:44 Page- 12 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 5510.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA ADMINISTRATION 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 5914.5516 COST OF GOODS SOLD METERS TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS METER REPAIR 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC -OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 345.05 275464 8/18/2005 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 887.95 118162 366235 887.95 275465 8/18/2005 101774 HONEYWELL INC. 7,012.75 MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE 118308 3234412 19,959.00 MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE 118308 3234412 26,971.75 275466 811812005 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS 337.77 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 118309 081005 337.77 275467 8/1812005 101997 HUDSON MAP COMPANY 67.58 MAP BOOKS 118245 100 67.58 275468 8/18/2005 100811 HYDRO METERING TECHNOLOGY 1,175.77 WATER METERS 118310 0030247 -IN 3,707.94 WATER METERS 118310 0030247 -IN 4,883.71 275469 8/18/2005 101183 INSPECTRON INC. 5,410.00 JULY INSPECTIONS 118115 080805 5,410.00 275470 8/18/2005 101861 J.H. LARSON COMPANY 42.53 WIRE 118116 4492033 -01 69.56 FISHTAPE 118116 4492033 -01 155.47 WIRE 118116 4492033 -01 267.56 275471 8118/2005 118631 JACK NORTON AND 150.00 PERFORMANCE 8/22/05 118246 080105 150.00 8/17/2005 13:19:44 Page- 12 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 5510.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA ADMINISTRATION 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 5914.5516 COST OF GOODS SOLD METERS TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS METER REPAIR 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC -OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 275472 811812005 Amount Supplier / Explanation 103067 JENSON, THOMAS 402.80. LUNCH - SAFETY CAMP 402,80 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8118/2005 -8/18/2005 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 118311 080905 1624.6406 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/17/2005 13:19:44 Page - . 13 Business Unit PLAYGROUND & THEATER 275473 811812005 100828 JERRY S FOODS 9.79 118342 2198 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 28.40 118342 2198 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 42.09 118342 2198 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 46.75 118342 2198 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 108.30 118342 2198 1470.6106 MEETING EXPENSE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 154.23 118342 2198 1400.6106 MEETING- EXPENSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 233.30 118342 2198 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 409.86 118342 2198 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 1,032.72 275474 8118/2005 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 5.99 117945 073105 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 8.58 117945 073105 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 9.89 117945 073105 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL'GENERAL_ 17.26 117945 073105 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL - 19.28 117945 073105 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 24.24 117945 073105 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 24.66 117945 073105 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 27.09 117945 073105 1330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TRAFFIC SIGNALS 28.20 117945 073105 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 34.60 117945 073105 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 35.31 117945 073105 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW REVOLVING 40.64 117945 073105 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 47.12 117945 073105 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 62.72 117945 073105. 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 69.40 117945 073105 1553.6406 GENERAL.SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 137.49 117945 073105 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 152.97 117945 073105 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 158.11 117945 073105 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET REVOLVING 159.78 117945 073105 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 172.53 117945 073105 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 218.75 117945 073105 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 241.77 117945 073105 1375.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKING RAMP 471.64 117945 073105 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 2,168.02 275475 8/18/2005 100830 JERRY'S PRINTING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount 241.76 241.76 275476 8/18/2005 2,982.00 13,381.15 16,363.15 Supplier / Explanation WATER NOTICE 102146 JESSEN PRESS WATER REPORT ABOUT TOWN CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/18/2005 -- 8/18/2005 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 117946 33649 5913.6575 117947 51592 117947 51592 275477 8/18/2005 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 2.85 118163 1934824 2,139.68 118164 1941843 23.00 118165 1941842 1.878.55 118166 1941841 184.85 118167 1941839 954.50 118168 1941837 620.90 118169 1941846 244.55 118170 1938476 105.90- 118171 287152 556.75- 118172 287392 21.60- 118173 287694 1,419.65 118368 1941835 307.60 118369 1941836 342.97 118370 1941834 136.95 118371 1941833 91.20 118372 1939230 4,020.00 118373 1941852 685.17 118374 1941847 1,184.60 118375 1941850 13,552.77 275478 8/18/2005 102719 JOHNSON, PHILLIP 207.57 DVD'S, CD DISCS 118117 080905 207.57 275479 8118/2005 118624 JOUBERT, GENEVIEVE 594.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 118118 081005 594.00 275480 8118/2005 106186- KAEDING & ASSOCIATES INC. 336.00 ELEC ENGINEERING SERVICE 117948 400808D 336.00 5913.6575 2210.6123 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5515 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5822.5512 5822.5513 5822.5512 5822.5513 5862.5512 5862.5512 5862.5513 5862.5513 5125.5510 1470.4329 05447.1705.21 8/17/2005 13:19:44 Page - 14 Subledger Account Description Business Unit PRINTING DISTRIBUTION PRINTING DISTRIBUTION MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MEDIA STUDIO AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONSULTING INSPECTION WM447 WELL #4 4701 SOUTHVIEW 8117/2005 13:19:44 Page - 15 Business Unit BA -321 VALLEY VIEW - WOODDALE UTILITY REVENUES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 15000 PERFORMANCE 8/29/05 118315 080105 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 275485 8118/2005 100846 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO 880.15 118174 CITY OF EDINA 5842.5514 R55CKREG LOG20000 -YORK SELLING - 73.00 118175 443600 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING Council Check Register 19.00 118376 444110. 5822.5515 8/18/2005 - 8/18/2005 50TH ST SELLING Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 275481 8/18/2005 105990 KELLY GREEN IRRIGATION INC. 71.00 118378 443469 5822.5515 784.10 SPRINKLER REPAIR 118312 30435 01321.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 118379 784.10 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 275482 811812005 104943 KEVITT EXCAVATING INC. 275486 498.20 HYDRANT USAGE REFUND 118247 081005 5901.4626 SALE OF WATER 498.20 163.91 OAK WILT CONTROL 275483 8118/2005 1644.6103 102563 KOBE, BARBARA TREES & MAINTENANCE 163.91 60.00 CRAFT SUPPLIES 118104 081005 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 275487 8/1812005 84.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 118104 081005 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 144.00 137.15 DWI TOW 118314 275484 8/1812005 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 118635 KREITZER, MARK 137.15 8117/2005 13:19:44 Page - 15 Business Unit BA -321 VALLEY VIEW - WOODDALE UTILITY REVENUES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 15000 PERFORMANCE 8/29/05 118315 080105 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 275485 8118/2005 100846 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO 880.15 118174 443605 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER -YORK SELLING - 73.00 118175 443600 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 19.00 118376 444110. 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 2,494.00 118377 444131 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 71.00 118378 443469 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 687.60 118379 443468 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 4,224.75 275486 8118/2005 100847 KUNDE CO INC 163.91 OAK WILT CONTROL 118313 14090 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 163.91 275487 8/1812005 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS 137.15 DWI TOW 118314 081505 4601.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE FORFEITURE 137.15 275488 8118/2005 100354 LAGUNA CLAY CO. 1,521.71 CLAY 118119 74985 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 1,521.71 275489 8118/2005 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 66.73 NUTS, SCREWS, WASHERS 117949 3462796 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 116.62 IMPACT SET 118248 3490843 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 183.35 R55CKREG LOG20000 PSTF OCCUPANCY 48.01 OIL CITY OF EDINA ROAD 275493 8118/2005 ROAD 118625 LORENTZ, MIKE STREET RENOVATION Council Check Register OIL STREET RENOVATION 87.72 UNIFORM PURCHASE 118121 080805 8/18/2005 - 8/18/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 118530 LPD ELECTRIC 275490 8118/2005 100853 LEEF SERVICES 8,307.18 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 118283 081905 32.63 SHOP TOWELS 118024 430898 5422.6201 LAUNDRY 275495 8/18/2005 32.63 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 275491 8/18/2065 100854 LEITNER COMPANY 185092 793.52 477.97 SOIL 118025 8101BRAEMAR 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 105680 MAAS, STACY 2,267.51 SAND 118026 8101/05 5422.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK 118249 081105 2,745.48 130.73 PETTY CASH 118249 275492 8/18/2005 102204 LOBBY, MACKENZIE 275497 8/1812005 9.57 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 118120 080905 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 420.68 19.01 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 118120 080905 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 420.68 19.43 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 118120 080905 5310.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 8/17/2005 13:19:44 Page - 16 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS POOL OPERATION POOL OPERATION POOL ADMINISTRATION 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 08042.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS VALLEY VIEW LIGHTING 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5610.6406 5630.6406 7411.6103 1314.6519 1314.6519 1314.6519 i" 4.6519 GENERAL SUPPLIES ED ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 48.01 OIL STREET RENOVATION ROAD 275493 8118/2005 ROAD 118625 LORENTZ, MIKE STREET RENOVATION ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION 87.72 UNIFORM PURCHASE 118121 080805 87.72 275494 8/18/2005 118530 LPD ELECTRIC 8,307.18 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 118283 081905 8,307.18 275495 8/18/2005 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 793.52 118380 185092 793.52 275496 8/1812005 105680 MAAS, STACY 41.29 PETTY CASH 118249 081105 130.73 PETTY CASH 118249 081105 172.02 275497 8/1812005 114699 MANAGED SERVICES INC. 420.68 JANITORIAL SERVICE 117950 607557 420.68 275498 8118/2005 102981 MARATHON ASHLAND PETROLEUM LLC 60.00 TRAILER RENTAL 117951 096644 4,402.68 CRS -2 EMULSION 118027 829232 60.00 TRAILER FEE 118028 096638 50.00 TRAILER FEE 118029 096926 8/17/2005 13:19:44 Page - 16 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS POOL OPERATION POOL OPERATION POOL ADMINISTRATION 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 08042.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS VALLEY VIEW LIGHTING 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5610.6406 5630.6406 7411.6103 1314.6519 1314.6519 1314.6519 i" 4.6519 GENERAL SUPPLIES ED ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 275499 8118/2005 275500 8/18/2005 275501 8/18/2005 275502 8/18/2005 275503 8/18/2005 275504 8/18/2005 Amount Supplier / Explanation 4,518.37 CRS -2 EMULSION 4,501.84 CRS -2 EMULSION 13,602.89 830389 .03 100868 MARK VII SALES CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/18/2005 - 8/18/2005 PO # Doc No " Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 118030 838498 1314.6519 ROAD OIL 118031 893077. 1314.6519 ROAD OIL 80.00 118176 827796 3,249.45 118177 830389 .03 118178 830388 2,248.35 118179 827795 3,182.55 118180 827597 112.80 118181 830390 2,343.45 118182 830612 1,579.80 118381 832862 17.60 118382 832863 12,814.03 102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC 170.00 PHONE CHANGES 118316 26173 170.00 101790 MCMAHON, DANIEL 30.00 ELECTRICAL LICENSE 118032 080905 30.00 101483 MENARDS 148.04 PLANER 117952 48905 495.11 BRIDGE REPAIR LUMBER 118033 44794 67.47 SAKRETE CONCRETE MIX 118034 47012 190.33 BLOWER, PHONE HOLDERS 118343 35528 168.27- RETURN BLOWER 118344 35560 732.68 101987 MENARDS 95.04 PUMP, LIGHTS, VALVE 118250 14119 32.04 CHAIN, FACE SHIELD 118251 13798 31.67 BATTERIES, TAPE 118252 12920 55.24 HOSE 118253 14192 31.11 DRILL BITS, TAPE 118254 14089 59.20 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 118255 15860 304.30 100882 MERIT SUPPLY 5862.5515 5862.5514 5862.5514 5862.5514 5862.5514 5862.5515 5842.5514 5822.5514 5822.5515 1550.6188 1281.6104 1301.6556 5422.6577 5422.6406 5620.6406 5620.6406 5630.6406 5630.6406 5630.6406 5630.6406 5620.6406 5620.6406 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX TELEPHONE 8/17/2005 13:19:44 Page - 17 Business Unit STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING TOOLS LUMBER GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTENNIAL LAKES EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK R55CKREG LOG20000 89,471.28 CITY OF EDINA 275509 8/18/2005 Council Check Register 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 8/18/2005 — 8/18/2005 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 118281 AUG 19 739.79 DEGREASER 118256 67514 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 118281 AUG 19 739.79 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 66,837.87 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 275505 8/18/2005 01204.1705.30 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME 166,906.40 275,767.36 SEWER SERVICE 118124 0000804061 5922.6302 SEWER SERVICE METRO 100692 MIDWEST COCA -COLA EAGAN 275,767.36 149.70 275506 8/18/2005 80747049 104650 MICRO CENTER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 524.70 118184 195.81 PRINTER SUPPLIES 118035 945081 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 118185 195.81 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 1,136.80 275507 8118/2005 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 275511 8/18/2005 101356 MIDWEST FENCE & MFG COMPANY 153.41 ASPHALT 117953 75302MB 1301.6518 BLACKTOP CAPS, FENCE PARTS 118036 296.13 ASPHALT 117953 75302MB 1314.6518 BLACKTOP 449.54 275512 8/1812005 275508 8118/2005 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 317.74 8/17/2005 13:19:44 Page- 18 Business Unit ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS SEWER TREATMENT ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GENERAL MAINTENANCE STREET RENOVATION 16,230.75 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 118280 081905 05442.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM SCHAEFER WESTWOOD INTERLACH 30,166.49 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 118280 081905 01216.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS SCHAEFER RD WESTWOOD - INTERLA 43,074.04 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 118280 081905 04313.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS STS -313 SCHAEFER ROAD _ STS 300 52, 53, KELL, OAK HALI SS-423 S. HARRIET PARK WM 52, 53, KELLOGG, OAK BROOKVIEW - 52 TO 54 RECLAIM 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING FIELD MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GRC" '"-%S 89,471.28 275509 8/18/2005 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 22,308.62 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 118281 AUG 19 04300.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 23,247.05 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 118281 AUG 19 03423.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 54,512.86 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 118281 AUG 19 05439.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 66,837.87 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 118281 AUG 19 01204.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 166,906.40 275510 8/18/2005 100692 MIDWEST COCA -COLA EAGAN 149.70 118183 80747049 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 524.70 118184 80690071 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 462.40 118185 80303279 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 1,136.80 275511 8/18/2005 101356 MIDWEST FENCE & MFG COMPANY 99.82 CAPS, FENCE PARTS 118036 116148 1642.6530 REPAIR PARTS 99.82 275512 8/1812005 103186 MIDWEST FUELS 317.74 FUEL 118037 27646 5422.6581 GASOLINE '9.96 FUEL 118038 27581 F' -^+581 GASOLINE STS 300 52, 53, KELL, OAK HALI SS-423 S. HARRIET PARK WM 52, 53, KELLOGG, OAK BROOKVIEW - 52 TO 54 RECLAIM 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING FIELD MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GRC" '"-%S R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/18/2005 - 8/18/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 974.31 FUEL 118039 27579 5422.6581 GASOLINE 594.07 FUEL 118040 27644 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 205.00 GENERATOR DIESEL FUEL 118122 080905 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES. 1,024.19 GENERATOR DIESEL FUEL 118122 080905 5913.6185 LIGHT &POWER CONTRACTED REPAIRS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER PURCHASED CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/17/2005 13:19:44 Page - 19 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RANGE CITY HALL GENERAL DISTRIBUTION PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CLUB HOUSE DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FINANCE 3,554.27 275513 8/18/2005 105611 MILHOFF MACHINE & WELDING INC. 69.23 FABRICATE SHAFT 118041 5475 5911.6180 69.23 275514 8/1812005 118504 MILLER, HAYLEY 103.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 118286 081205 5110.6103 103.00 275515 8/18/2005 102582 MINN DEPT. OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 10.00 BOILER LICENSE 117957 B42351RO682321 5420.6406 .10.00 275516 8/18/2005 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 28,971.74 WATER PURCHASE 118123 080805 5913.6601 28,971.74 275517 8/18/2005 100913 MINNEAPOLIS SUBURBAN SEWER & W 540.00 CURB BOX REPAIR 117954 32718 5913.6180 1,440.00 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 117955 32720 5913.6180 1,080.00 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 117956 32719 5913.6180 3,060.00 275518 8/18/2005 100522 MINNESOTA AIR INC. 170.94 MOTOR, DUAL CAPACITOR 118257 3032036 -00 5111.6406 262.42 MOTORS 118258 3031819 -00 5860.6406 433.36 275519 8/1812005 112299 MINNESOTA BRICK & TILE DIV. 30.00 BRICK 118042 82013 5422.6406 30.00 275520 8/18/2005 101589 MINNESOTA GFOA 600.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION (3) 118259 081205 1160.6104 600.00 275521 8/18/2005 100066 MINNESOTA MAILING SOLUTIONS CONTRACTED REPAIRS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER PURCHASED CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/17/2005 13:19:44 Page - 19 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RANGE CITY HALL GENERAL DISTRIBUTION PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CLUB HOUSE DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FINANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/18/2005 --8118/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 4582 INK ROLLERS 118317 30667 1550.6235 275526 8/1812005 172.04 218.28 390.32 275527 8/18/2005 19.05 63.11 221.31 221.31 1,140.14 42.42 '34 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER TANK, FITTINGS, VALVES FLOWJET, TIPS 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. OIL FILTER BUSHING, BALL JOINT SERVICE ASSEMBLIES SERVICE ASSEMBLIES ROLLERS BALL VALVE 117964 0065692 -IN 118319 0065721 -IN 5913.6530 5913.6530 1301.6519 1301.6519 1301.6519 1301.6519 1551.6406 1552.6406 1322.6406 1470.6406 1646.6406 5912.6406 5820.6406 1550.6046 4090.6406 1643.6530 Subledger Account Description POSTAGE REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS ROAD OIL ROAD OIL ROAD OIL ROAD OIL GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 8117/2005 13:19:44 Page - 20 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE CITY HALL GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS 50TH STREET GENERAL UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET REVOLVING REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 117965 45.82 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 275522 8/1812005 488705 -00 101376 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 118043 2,067.24 CURB BOXES 117958 0171781 118044 171.32 COUPLINGS 117959 0172005 118045 2,238.56 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 275523 8118/2005 488826 -00 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 63.90 EMULSION 117960 48584 108.63 EMULSION 117961 48554 95.85 EMULSION 117962 48572 255.60 EMULSION 117963 48571 523.98 275524 8/18/2005 101410 MINNESOTA STATE BOARD OF ELECT 50.00 MAINT FEE- JULY,AUG,SEPT 118318 1- 262 -774 50.00 MAINT FEE- JULY,AUG,SEPT 118318 1- 262 -774 50.00 MAINT FEE- JULY,AUG,SEPT 118318 1- 262 -774 50.00 MAINT FEE- JULY,AUG,SEPT 118318 1- 262 -774 50.00 MAINT FEE- JULY,AUG,SEPT 118318 1- 262 -774 50.00 MAINT FEE- JULY,AUG,SEPT 118318 1- 262 -774 50.00 MAINT FEE- JULY,AUG,SEPT 118318 1- 262 -774 350.00 275525 8/18/2005 101144 MINNESOTA UC FUND 1,089.67 .UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 118260 ID 55876 1,089.67 275526 8/1812005 172.04 218.28 390.32 275527 8/18/2005 19.05 63.11 221.31 221.31 1,140.14 42.42 '34 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER TANK, FITTINGS, VALVES FLOWJET, TIPS 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. OIL FILTER BUSHING, BALL JOINT SERVICE ASSEMBLIES SERVICE ASSEMBLIES ROLLERS BALL VALVE 117964 0065692 -IN 118319 0065721 -IN 5913.6530 5913.6530 1301.6519 1301.6519 1301.6519 1301.6519 1551.6406 1552.6406 1322.6406 1470.6406 1646.6406 5912.6406 5820.6406 1550.6046 4090.6406 1643.6530 Subledger Account Description POSTAGE REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS ROAD OIL ROAD OIL ROAD OIL ROAD OIL GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 8117/2005 13:19:44 Page - 20 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE CITY HALL GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS 50TH STREET GENERAL UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET REVOLVING REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 117965 488530 -00 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 117966 488705 -00 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 118043 463484 -01 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 118044 477148 -03 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 118045 485190 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 118261 488826 -00 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES R55CKREG LOG20000 1 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8118/2005 -- 8/1812005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 275528 8/18/2005 114343 MULLEN, JANET 32.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 118097 081005 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8/17/2005 13:19:44 Page - 21 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION WM447 WELL #4 4701 SOUTHVIEW HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD GENERAL STORM SEWER AQUATIC WEEDS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 32.00 FIRE DEPT. GENERAL TELEPHONE STREET REVOLVING TELEPHONE 275529 8/18/2005 PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 106364 MULLIN, TOM ENGINEERING GENERAL TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL TELEPHONE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 51.84 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 118262 081105 5410.6107 51.84 275530 8/18/2005 110522 MUNICIPAL BUILDERS INC. 5,187.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 7 118282 081905 05447.1705.30 5,187.00 275531 8/1812005 117034 NAPC - 35.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 118320 080105 1143.6103 35.00 275532 811812005 100012 NATIONAL WATERWORKS INC. 32.72 SPEEDCRETE 117967 2596229 5932.6406 32.72 275533 8/18/2005 105066 NATURAL REFLECTIONS VII LLC 1,120.38 COMPRESSOR WORK ON LAKE 118046 655 4086.6103 1,120.38 275534 8/18/2005 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 89.00 118186 32640 5842.5513 89.00 118383 32637 5822.5513 368.00 118384 32636 5862.5513 546.00 275535 8/18/2005 104672 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 272.77 118263 425483229 -027 5620.6230 1,497.13 ' 118321 757391129 -032 1470.6151 38.94 118322 873184124 -032 4090.6188 38.94 118322 873184124 -032 1553.6188 247.85 118322 873184124 -032 1640.6188 266.85 118322 873184124 -032 1260.6188 287.57 118322 873184124 -032 1322.6188 649.85 118322 873184124 -032 1301.6188 867.70 118322 873184124 -032 5910.6188 4,167.60 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8/17/2005 13:19:44 Page - 21 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION WM447 WELL #4 4701 SOUTHVIEW HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD GENERAL STORM SEWER AQUATIC WEEDS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL TELEPHONE STREET REVOLVING TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL TELEPHONE GENERAL MAINTENANCE TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/1712005 13:19:44 Council Check Register Page - 22 8/18/2005 --8/18/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 275536 8118/2005 102138 NORTHERN WINDS CONCERT BAND 75.00 PERFORMANCE 7/31/05 118323 081205 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC = OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 75.00 275537 811812005 118639 NORTHWEST LASERS INC. 94.15 PAINT 118324 S100025258 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 94.15 275538 8/18/2005 100930 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO. 727.11 TIRES 118264 NW -97140 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 727.11 275539 8118/2005 105901 OERTEL ARCHITECTS 3,632.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 118047 073005 05452.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN WM-452 3,632.00 275540 8/18/2005 105612 OFFICE TEAM 820.00 SARA ST. JAMES - TEMP 117968 13809488 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 820.00 275541 811812005 101592 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN 25.24 118345 072505. 2210.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 27.68 118345 072505 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 85.49 118345 072505 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 114.55 118345 072505 5610.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ED ADMINISTRATION 252.96 275542 8/1812005 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 69.91 SLEDGE HAMMER, CROWBAR 117969 350198 5913.6556 TOOLS DISTRIBUTION 49.20 ROPE 118048 347570 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 119.11 275543 8/1812005 101484 OSWALD HOSE & ADAPTERS 916.97 HOSES 117970 103454 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 916.97 275544 8/18/2005 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 291.42 118187 8077913 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,172.00 118188 8078261 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 72.00- 118189 8077728 -CM 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 12.00- 118190 8077732 -CM 5- 9513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 275545 8/18/2005 275546 8118/2005 Amount Supplier/ Explanation 1,931.37 YORK SELLING 474.00 118265 27.95 8/18/2005 - 8/1812005 1,407.14 PO # Doc No 5,159.88 Subledger Account Description 118385 101688 PELINKA, DICK 124.74 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 124.74 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 118387 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 118325 081005 CITY OF EDINA 244.80 YORK SELLING Council Check Register 118265 77104372 8/18/2005 - 8/1812005 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 118385 8078260 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 118386 8076740 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 118387 8078259 -IN 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 118387 8078259 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 118325 081005 1652.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5933.6180 1553.6406 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5515 5842.5513 5842.5512 5842.5515 5842.5512 5842.5513 5842.5513 5822.5513 5822.5513 5822.5512 5822.5515 5862.5513 5862.5513 5111.5510 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/17/2005 13:19:44 Page - 23 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING WEED MOWING CENTENNIAL LAKES PONDS & LAKES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 244.80 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 118265 77104372 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 244.80 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 275547 8/1812005 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 100948 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,586.11 POND REPAIR 117971 PO 5379 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,586.11 VERNON SELLING 275548 8/18/2005 100274 PGI COMPANIES INC 961.70 DRIVERS INSPECTION FORMS 118049 47694C 961.70 275549 8/18/2005 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 914.45 118191 2226243 100.70 118192 2226242 26.94 118193 2226240 567.60 118194 2226241 561.08 118195 2228661 47.20 118196 2228664 6.632.79 118197 2223595 42.25- 118198 3322042 70.80- 118199 3322317 588.45 118388 2228658 962.75 118389 2228656 87.25 118390 2228659 34.25 118391 2228657 2,555.05 118392 2228667 1,254.50 118393 2228665 14,219.96 275550 811812005 105875 PICKERMAN'S SOUP AND SANDWICHE 288.56 SONIA'S SNACKS 118125 1023 1652.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5933.6180 1553.6406 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5515 5842.5513 5842.5512 5842.5515 5842.5512 5842.5513 5842.5513 5822.5513 5822.5513 5822.5512 5822.5515 5862.5513 5862.5513 5111.5510 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/17/2005 13:19:44 Page - 23 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING WEED MOWING CENTENNIAL LAKES PONDS & LAKES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR ' 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT R55CKREG LOG20000 102354 PRO GUARD SPORTS INC. 199.64 LACES, TIP WAX CITY OF EDINA 8/17/2005 13:19:44 118640 PRO TURF 1,492.21 SPRINKLER REPAIR 192.21 Council Check Register Page - 24 8/18/2005 — 8/18/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 288.56 275551 8/18/2005 100956 PIPE SERVICES CORP 2,870.00 SANITARY SEWER TV INSPECTION. 118326 2005054 5923.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER COLLECTION SYSTEMS 2,870.00 275552 8/18/2005 100961 POSTMASTER 375.00 NEWSLETTER POSTAGE 118050 081005 1628.6235 POSTAGE SENIOR CITIZENS 375.00 275553 8/18/2005 116396 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 721.17 METHANE & CO2 117972 179640 7413.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF FIRE TOWER 721.17 275554 8/18/2005 100964 PRECISION TURF & CHEMICAL 594.80 WETTING AGENT 118051 25443 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,198.13 HERITAGE FUNGICIDE 118052 25548 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 81.99 SEED CADDIES 118053 25428 5423.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF CARS 2,874.92 275555 8/18/2005 105802 PRINT CRAFT INC. 373.02 POST -IT -NOTES 117973 13167 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 373.02 275556 8/18/2005 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC 68.00 BLADE SHARPENING 117974 212669 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 68.00 275557 8/18/2005 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 872.36 118200 274090 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 54.50 118201 274091 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 275558 8N8I2005 102354 PRO GUARD SPORTS INC. 199.64 LACES, TIP WAX 199.64 275559 8/18/2005 118640 PRO TURF 1,492.21 SPRINKLER REPAIR 192.21 118394 274082 5862.5513 118395 274086 5822.5513 117975 250945 5510.5510 118327 21658 01321.1705.30 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA ADMINISTRATION CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA -321 VALLEY VIEW - WOODDALE L R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/17/2005 13:19:44 Council Check Register Page - 25 8/18/2005 - 8/18/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 275560 8/18/2005 100969 PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING ENGINEE 565.00 RADIUM -STUDY 118266 03011.13 5915.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER TREATMENT 565.00 275561 8/18/2005 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 416.87 LINERS, SOAP, PADS 118267 3611 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 652.37 LINERS, SOAP, TISSUE 118268 3612 5630.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 1,069.24 275562 8118/2005 100971 QUALITY WINE 6.94- 118202 588703 -00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 704.89 118202 588703 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 7.80- 118203 588806 -00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 792.61 118203 588806 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 78.93- 118204 588889 -00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 3,973.17 118204 588889 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 66.69- 118205 584205 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 268.27- 118206 584661 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 7.84- 118396 588900 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 793.70 118396 588900 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 7.31- 118397 588704 -00 5620.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 740.64 118397 588704 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 44.78- 118398 588880 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 2,255.03 118398 588880 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 204.00 118399 588705 -00 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 6.03- 118400 588731 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 614.07 118400 588731 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 9.72- 118401 588807 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 986.55 118401 588807 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 10,560.35 275563 8/18/2005 101965 QWEST 502.32 612 E24 -8657 118070 8657 -8/05 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 563.34 612 E24 -8659 118071 8659 -8/05 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 281.67 612 E24 -8661 118072 8661 -8/05 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 51.36 952 926 -0092 118073 0092 -8/05 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 876.00 612 E01 -0426 118074 0426 -8/05 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 91.05 952 926 -0419 118075 0419 -8/05 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 281.67 612 E24 -8656 118328 8656 -8/05 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 2,647.41 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/17/2005 13:19:44 Council Check Register Page - 26 8/18/2005 -- 8118/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 275564 8118/2005 100972: R&R SPECIALTIES INC 692.36 BATTERY CHARGER REPAIRS 117976 23740 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 692.36 275565 8/18/2005 101111 REED BUSINESS INFORMATION 169.68 AD FOR BID 117977 2945446 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 195.94 AD FOR BID 117978 2966803 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 197.96 AD FOR BID 117979 2966802 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 147.46 AD FOR BID 117980 2966804 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 147.46 AD FOR BID 117981 2971306 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 195.94 AD FOR BID 117982 2971305 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 197.96 AD FOR BID 117983 2971304 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 197.96 AD FOR BID 117984 2976706 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 1,450.36 275566 8/18/2005 105631 RICHFIELD BUS COMPANY 397.00 8/03 CHANHASSEN TRIP 118269 132824 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 397.00 275567 8/18/2005 118634 ROLINE, KRISTEN 119.29 REIMBURSEMENT 118270 080905 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 119.29 275568 8/18/2005 118623 RUSSELL, DIANA 36.43 WATER BILL OVERPAYMENT 118126 081005 5900.1211.1 ACCTS RECEIVABLE MANUAL UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 36.43 275569 8/1812005 101682 S & S WORLDWIDE INC. 212.06 PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES 118127 5009469 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND 8 THEATER 212.06 275570 8/1812005 100990 SCHARBER & SONS 80.66 BELT, IDLER 117985 341662 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 80.66 . 275571 8118/2005 103015 SCHEERER, JOHN 148.94 UNIFORM PURCHASE 118271. 081005 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 148.94 275572 811812005 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 15.01. LUMBER 117986 40136027 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 1.45 STAKES, NAILS 117987 40142038 - 406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/18/2005 -- 8/1812005 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No , Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 8/18/2005 37.50 LUMBER 117988 40141148 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 110.00 SHUTTER REPAIR 212.96 SNS25215 5431.6180 110.00 275573 8/18/2005 101577 SCHMOLL, RUTH 275577 8/1812005 101383 SIITARI, MICHAEL 347.00 PETTY CASH 118329 080905 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 081105 1460.6104 347.00 360.00 275574 8/18/2005 8/1812005 118636 SHELLUM, DOMINIC 105163 SIMPLE TO GRAND 32.00 PARKING PERMIT.REFUND 118330 081205 4090.4751 PARKING PERMITS 137.60 32.00 275579 8/18/2005 275575 8/18/2005 118211 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 63.77 GLASS CLEANER 118055 91.17 PAINT 117989 1179 -1 1301.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES . COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 8/17/2005 13:19:44 Page - 27 Business Unit GENERAL STORM SEWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL STREET REVOLVING GENERAL MAINTENANCE RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE CIVILIAN DEFENSE SPECIAL ACTIVITIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING DISTRIBUTION CENTENNIAL LAKES 91.17 275576 8/18/2005 102841 SHUTTERS'N SHADES 110.00 SHUTTER REPAIR 118054 SNS25215 5431.6180 110.00 275577 8/1812005 101383 SIITARI, MICHAEL 360.00 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 118272 081105 1460.6104 360.00 275578 8/1812005 105163 SIMPLE TO GRAND 137.60 MRPA LUNCH 118331 396025 1627.6406 137.60 275579 8/18/2005 101275 SJS CORP - CUSTOM /PSC SUPPLY 63.77 GLASS CLEANER 118055 6298 1646.6406 63.77 275580 8/1812005 101002 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS INC 2,734.90 118207 169078 5842.5514 38.75 118208 169079 5842.5515 1,021.10 118402 169076 5822.5514 52.60 118403 169075 5822.5515 3,847.35 275581 8/1812005 101004 SPS COMPANIES 173.30 COPPER TUBING 117990 51281327.001 5913.6530 17.24 VALVE, ADAPTER 118273 S1280121.001 5630.6530 190.54 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES . COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 8/17/2005 13:19:44 Page - 27 Business Unit GENERAL STORM SEWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL STREET REVOLVING GENERAL MAINTENANCE RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE CIVILIAN DEFENSE SPECIAL ACTIVITIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING DISTRIBUTION CENTENNIAL LAKES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register . 8118/2005 -- 8/18/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 275582 8/18/2005 106452 STONE, HOLLY . 456.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 118102 081005 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 456.00 275583 8/1812005 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 895.60 REPAIRS 117991 CVCB486825 1553.6530 4,974.93 REPAIRS 117992 CVCB485690 1553.6180 1120.6120 1120.6120 1120.6120 1120.6120 REPAIR PARTS CONTRACTED REPAIRS ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL 5431.6545 CHEMICALS 5,870.53 TELEPHONE 5915.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 275584 8/1812005 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 101.89 PUBLISH NOTICE 117993 795825 39.33 PUBLISH NOTICE 117994 796263 121.55 AD FOR BID 117995 795014 157.30 AD FOR BID 117996 795013 420.07 275585 8/18/2005 102925 SUPERIOR TECH PRODUCTS 378.08 POND TREATMENT 118056 1821 -D 378.08 275586 8118/2005 110674 SUPERIOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIO 292.75 PHONE 118274 .10812 292.75 275587 8/18/2005 118641 TECH ELECTRIC OF MINNESOTA 3,889.52 ELECTRIC SERVICE CONNECTION 118332 2724 3,889.52 275588 8/18/2005 105303 TEETERS, JUDY 100.00 PERFORMANCE 8/24/05 118275 080105 100.00 275589 8/18/2005 113549 TENNIS WEST 9,733.03 RESURFACE TENNIS COURTS 118333 05 -200 9,733.03 275590 8/18/2005 118157 TESSCO TECHNOLOGIES INC. 153.47 FLANGE ARRESTORS 117997 218304 153.47 275591 8118/2005 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 1120.6120 1120.6120 1120.6120 1120.6120 REPAIR PARTS CONTRACTED REPAIRS ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL 5431.6545 CHEMICALS 1400.6188 TELEPHONE 5915.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5610.6136 1647.6103 5913.6530 8/17/2005 13:19:44 Page - . 28 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL WATER TREATMENT PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REPAIR PARTS PATHS & HARD SURFACE DISTRIBUTION R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation CITY OF EDINA 8/17/2005 13:19:44 Council Check Register Page - 29 8/18/2005 - 8/18/2005 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 118209 381599 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 118210 381600 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 275592 8/18/2005 PONDS & LAKES 114701 TIME WARNER CABLE GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS 50.62 ACCT 0379101 -01 117998 072705 1553.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 50.62 5911.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER 275593 8/18/2005 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 19.35 CYLINDER DEMURRAGE 117999 480279 12.69 WELDING GASES 118000 480277 25.80 WELDING SUPPLIES 118276 480278 57.84 275594 8/18/2005 101374 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE 800.00 FENCE REPAIR 118001 18235 800.00 275595 8/18/2005 101045 TURF SUPPLY COMPANY 527.18 BALLWASHER FOR RANGE 118057 098058 51.12 RANGE FLAGS 118058 098056 578.30 275596 8/18/2005 118626 TWIN CITIES KIDS DIRECTORY 500.00 SEPT /OCT AD 118128 590 500.00 275597 8/18/2005 102255 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO 39.42 OXYGEN 118334 839393 39.42 275598 8/18/2005 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 84.35 EROSION BLANKETS 118059 12710 84.35 275599 8/18/2005 115379 U.S. BANK 40.00 SECRETARY OF STATE 118060 080405 291.00 FIELD TRIPS 118060 080405 408.23 SHELF 118060 080405 149.75 PODS 118335 AUG 04 276.88 TELECORDERS 118335 AUG 04 282.11 PROMOTIONAL ITEMS 118335 AUG 04 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5913.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTENNIAL LAKES 5933.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS PONDS & LAKES 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 1553.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5911.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER R55CKREG LOG20000 TISSUE 118002 CITY OF EDINA 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 520.29 CONCESSION PRODUCT Council Check Register 33523493 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 573.64 8118/2005 -8118/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1,447.97 285.00 ANNUAL INSPECTION 275600 811812005 5511.6406 101055 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 190.00 SPRINKLER INSPECTION 118277 85.00 TREE INSPECTOR 118129 WORKSHOP 1640.6027 TRAINING 85.00 275601 8/18/2005 118629 UPPER MIDWEST BEAD SOCIETY 790.53 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 118095 080405 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 790.53 275602 8/18/2005 101908 US FOODSERVICE INC 8/17/2005 13:19:44 Page - 30 Business Unit PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES. 53.35 TISSUE 118002 33523493 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 520.29 CONCESSION PRODUCT 118002 33523493 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 573.64 116768 WET PAINT INC. 275603 8/18/2005 102004 VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER COM 285.00 ANNUAL INSPECTION 118003 102030 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 190.00 SPRINKLER INSPECTION 118277 100980 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 475.00 275604 8/18/2005 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER •202.49 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 118336 157627 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 202.49 275605 811812005 101069 VOSS LIGHTING BUILDING MAINTENANCE 9.05 MINIATURE LAMPS 118004 15020568 -01 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 24.88 LIGHTS 118005 15020917 -01 1330.6530 REPAIR PARTS TRAFFIC SIGNALS 33.93 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 118093 080405 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 275606 8/18/2005 101328 WALBRIDGE, DAVID 150.00 PERFORMANCE 8/30/05 118278 080105 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 275607 8/18/2005 115072 WELCH, HOLLY 40.92 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 118093 080405 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 40.92 275608 8/18/2005 101076 WEST PHOTO 242.34 MEDIA SUPPLIES 118061 23996 5125.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 242.34 275609 8/18/2005 116768 WET PAINT INC. ART CENTER REVENUES MEDIA STUDIO R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/17/2005 13:19:44 Council Check Register Page - 31 .8/18/2005 - 8/18/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 50.00 PAPER PADS 118130 008834 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 50.00 275610 8/18/2005 117097 WILKIE, WILLIAM 15.32 UNIFORM PURCHASE, 118131 080805 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 15.32 275611 8/18/2005 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 385.75 118211 121380 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 812.65 118404 121378 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING - 696.05 118405 121435 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE _ VERNON SELLING 84.00- 118406 121274 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,810.45 275612 8/18/2005 101312 WINE MERCHANTS - 823.90 118407 131784 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING . 1,214.50 118408 131786 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6.93- 118409 25372 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,031.47 275613 8/18/2005 118368 WOLFF, SARA 311.85 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 118337 072205 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 311.85 275614 8/18/2005 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 386.71 118212 167598 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 758.50 118410 167667 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 382.25 118411 167722 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,527.46 275615 8/18/2005 100300 WRIGHT COUNTY 500.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 118346 081605 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 500.00 275616 8/18/2005 101726 XCEL ENERGY 21.18 51- 4151897 -6 118076 36177900 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 31.08 51- 6892224 -5 118077 35447107 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 8.67 51- 6541084 -2 118078 35743560 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 2,200.68 51- 4159265 -8 118079 35834312 7411.6185 LIGHT & POWER PSTF OCCUPANCY 192.81 51- 5938955 -6 118080 35552667 4086.6185 LIGHT & POWER AQUATIC WEEDS 666.80 51- 6137136 -8 118081 35424371 5430.6185 LIGHT & POWER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 27,604.63 51- 4621797 -2 118082. 35381045 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR Total Payments 1,630,232.76 EQUIPMENT RENTAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL TELEPHONE 8/17/2005 13:19:44 Page - 32 Business Unit GENERAL STORM SEWER YORK FIRE STATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CLUB HOUSE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS PONDS & LAKES CIVILIAN DEFENSE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY POOL OPERATION TRAFFIC SIGNALS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS PARKING RAMP BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PSTF OCCUPANCY CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS SCHAEFER RD WESTWOOD - INTERLA SAFETY EQUIPMENT ARENA ADMINISTRATION 83,765.78 CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 811812005 .100568 XEROX CORPORATION 531.18 Council Check Register 118006 011620156 1550.6151 8/1812005 -- 8/18/2005 118132 011396049 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 178.72 51- 4156445 -0 118083 35516673 5932.6185 LIGHT & POWER 146.52 51- 6229265 -9 118084= 35556295 1481.6185 LIGHT & POWER 878.64 51-V29265-9 118084 35556295 1470.6185 LIGHT & POWER 1,660.83 51- 6824328 -7 118085 36679360 5420.6185 LIGHT & POWER 739.02 51- 6046826 -0 118086 35553163 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER 92.94 51- 5634814 -2 118087 35543152 5933.6185 LIGHT & POWER 51.52 51- 6692497 -0 118088 35446727 1460.6185 LIGHT & POWER 1,033.39 51- 6979948 -4 118089 36054738 5821.6185 LIGHT & POWER 1,465.31 51- 6979948 -4 118089 36054738 5861.6185 LIGHT & POWER 1,708.04 51- 69799484 118089 36054738 5841.6185 LIGHT & POWER 6,839.53 514827232 -6 118090 35591753 5311.6185 LIGHT & POWER 13,640.06 51- 4966303 -6 118091 36234644 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER 16,876.59 514888627 -1 118092 36326451 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER 3,948.27 51- 5888961 -7 118279 36816286 1375.6185 LIGHT & POWER 3,780.55 51- 6121102 -5 118338 37169675 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER Total Payments 1,630,232.76 EQUIPMENT RENTAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL TELEPHONE 8/17/2005 13:19:44 Page - 32 Business Unit GENERAL STORM SEWER YORK FIRE STATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CLUB HOUSE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS PONDS & LAKES CIVILIAN DEFENSE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY POOL OPERATION TRAFFIC SIGNALS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS PARKING RAMP BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PSTF OCCUPANCY CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS SCHAEFER RD WESTWOOD - INTERLA SAFETY EQUIPMENT ARENA ADMINISTRATION 83,765.78 275617 811812005 .100568 XEROX CORPORATION 531.18 JULY USAGE 118006 011620156 1550.6151 104.00 JULY USAGE 118132 011396049 5110.6151 635.18 275618 8/1812005 118288 XO COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES INC 568.77 PHONE /DATA 115091 16534345 7411.6188 568.77 275619 8/1812005 118637 YERIGAN CONSTRUCTION CO. 110.50 SPRINKLER REPAIR 118339 072105 01216.1705.30 110.50 275620 8/1812005 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE . 117.07 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 118007 54064818 5510.6610 117.07 1,630,232.76 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 1,630,232.76 Total Payments 1,630,232.76 EQUIPMENT RENTAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL TELEPHONE 8/17/2005 13:19:44 Page - 32 Business Unit GENERAL STORM SEWER YORK FIRE STATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CLUB HOUSE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS PONDS & LAKES CIVILIAN DEFENSE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY POOL OPERATION TRAFFIC SIGNALS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS PARKING RAMP BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PSTF OCCUPANCY CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS SCHAEFER RD WESTWOOD - INTERLA SAFETY EQUIPMENT ARENA ADMINISTRATION R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 8/18/2005 - 8/18/2005 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 172,324.14 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 14,795.96 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 152,927.77 04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND 355,610.12 05100 ART CENTER FUND 11,375.29 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 54.01 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 18,619.50 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 16,585.12 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 45,337.69 05600 EDINBOROUGH/CENT LAKES FUND 13,496.47 05800 LIQUOR FUND 137,191.50 05900 UTILITY FUND 624,392.54 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 29,482.06 05950 RECYCLING FUND 33,874.00 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 4,166.59 Report Totals 1,630,232.76 8/17/2005 13:43:48 Page - 1 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing pol,icies and �sa Fins City R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/24/2005 8:19:27 Council Check Register Page - 1 8/25/2005 --8/25/2005 Check #. Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 275621 8/25/2005 108757 3D SPECIALTIES 828.54 SIGN POSTS, BATTERIES 118540 419462 1343.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BRIDGES GUARD RAILS 828.54 275622 8/25/2005 102043 A LAPOINTE SIGN INC. 15.98 NAME BADGES 118413 13804 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION_ 15.98 275623 8/25/2005 102403 AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT 162.94 BLACK DIRT 118742 22253 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 84.55 BLACK DIRT 118743 22258 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 120.23 SOD, DIRT 118744 22246 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 367.72 275624 8/2512005 118647 ACCESSIBLE ENVIRONMENTS INC. 500.00 ASSESSEMENT SURVEY /ANALYSIS 118624 1599 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 500.00 275625 8/25/2005 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 39.40 118501 467515 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 53.36 118502 467512 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 16.28 118696 467615 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 54.52 118768 466302 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 163.56 275626 8/25/2005 100616 ACTION MAILING SERVICES INC. 404.42 MAIL PROCESSING 118745 104841 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 404.42 275627 8125/2005 102626 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES 1,410.60 READY MIX 118541 4122690 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 612.16 READY MIX 118542 4122453 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 705.30 READY MIX 118543 4121369 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION _ 188.08 READY MIX 118544 4122092 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 1,128.16 READY MIX 118658 4122093 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 799.34 READY MIX 118659 4122910 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 4,843.64 275628 8/25/2005 101479 AMERICAN SERVICE CORP. 65.00 REPLACE CABLES ON BALER 118625 6560 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY 65.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8125/2005 -8/2512005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No _ Subledger Account Description 275629 8125/2005 101874 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC. 1,946.00 TRAVEL CHARGERS, BATTERIES 118414 41399 44003.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 2,497.43 PAGERS 118828 41338 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 4,443.43 275630 8/25/2005 102109 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER 287.59 RADIO REPAIR 118746 65102 1553.6237 RADIO SERVICE 156.33 RADIO REPAIR 118829 65138 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 318.17 RADIO REPAIR T -90 118830 65089 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 762.09 275631 8/25/2005 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 984.91 FOOD 118415 428009 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 487.34 FOOD 118416 431233 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,472.25 275632 8/25/2005 118648 APPLIED POWER PRODUCTS INC 152.05 BELT 118626 552170180 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 152.05 275633 8/25/2005 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING 32.27 SADDLES, RISERS 118747 8462 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 32.27 275634 8/25/2005 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 147.00 COFFEE 118417 6013483129 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 80.95 COFFEE 118545 6013- 487947 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 227.95 275635 8/25 /2005 118061 ARAMARK UNIFORM 144.30 UNIFORM PURCHASE 118627 57858172 -1 1301.6201 LAUNDRY 144.30 275636 8/25/2005 101977 ARCH WIRELESS 10.97 PAGER 118546 A6096083H 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 65.03 PAGER RENTAL 118831 A6339611H 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 76.00 275637 8/25/2005 101954 AUGIE'S INC. 51.64 FOOD 118418 23741 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 65.22 FOOD 118419 23955 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 76.18 FOOD 118547 24383 5aan.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 8/24/2005 8:19:27 Page - 2 Business Unit 800 MHZ RADIO FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GRILL GRILL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS STREET RENOVATION RICHARDS GOLF COURSE CITY HALL GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE CITY HALL GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE CITY OF EDINA 8/24/2005 8:19:27 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 3 8/25/2005 -8/25/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 193.04 275638 8125/2005. 112862 AXELSON, MARY 31.85 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 118859 082005 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 31.85 275639 8/25/2005 105016 BARBEAU MARKETING GROUP INC. 5,660.10 SALES COMMISSION 118548 2005 -04 2210.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 5,660.10 275640 8125/2005 105838 BAUDVILLE 194.95 CERTIFICATE FOLDERS 118748 1350490 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 194.95 275641 8/25/2005 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 172.50 118503 34209100 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 46.50 118504 40364200 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 669.45 118505 34209000 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 24.00 118506 40364100 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING _ 2,199.00 118769 34283100 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 371.00 118770 34313300 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 747.60 118771 34313200 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 4,230.05 275642 8/25/2005 100661 BENN, BRADLEY 92.95 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 118860 082005 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 92.95 275643 8/25/2005 117697 BENSON, NANCY 31.20 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 118861 082005 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 31.20 275644 8/25/2005 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 30.85 MARKERS, TAPE DISPENSER 118549 OE -619 -1 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 102.86 OFFICE SUPPLIES 118628 WO- 373172 -1 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 131.07 OFFICE SUPPLIES 118628 WO- 373172 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 75.83 OFFICE SUPPLIES 118629 WO- 373450 -1 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING 7.66 OFFICE SUPPLIES 118630 WO- 372481 -1 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FINANCE 23.17 OFFICE SUPPLIES 118630 WO- 372481 -1 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 30.32 OFFICE SUPPLIES 118630 WO- 372481 -1 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING 13.71- CREDIT 118631 CM -13 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 288.86 OFFICE SUPPLIES 118632 4052840 5840.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation GENERAL SUPPLIES 31.57 OFFICE SUPPLIES W263578 708.48 RUBBISH REMOVAL 275645 8/25/2005 118421 101296 BERTRAND, MIKE 5422.6182 64.94 PRINTER & CABLE 118550 64.94 5913.6180 275646 8125/2005 DISTRIBUTION 101676 BIFFS INC CR728307 66.41 RESTROOM RENTAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 252.82 RESTROOM RENTAL 1553.6530 319.23 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 275647 8/25/2005 CM761917 100654 BJORK STONE INC. REPAIR PARTS 300.00 WALL REPAIR 760979 300.00 REPAIR PARTS 275648 8/2512005 118882 102392 BLACK, STEVE 1553.6530 133.50 OFFICIATING FEES 118883 133.50 1553.6530 275649 8/2512005 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 103866 BLALOCK, KAREN 762459 47.13 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 47.13 762831 275650 8125/2005 REPAIR PARTS 102276 BLUHM, KIMBERLEE 118886 25.97 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC REPAIR PARTS 25.97 275652 8/25/2005 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 83.66 FLEX TUBE 291.72 REPAIRS 408.81 RELAY, MODULE, VALVE 13.86- INSULATOR 121.42- VALVE ASSEMBLY 585.17- CREDIT 104.88- CREDIT 274.46- CREDIT 433.28- CREDIT 222.99- CREDIT 15.09 SPRING EYES 2.65 _ GASKET 72 SLACK ADJUSTERS CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/25/2005 -- 8/25/2005 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 118749 WO- 373683 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/24/2005 8:19:27 Page - 4 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 118633 081505 5430.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 118420 W263578 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 118421 W263577 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 118550 805 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 118740 081905 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 118862 082005 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 118863 082005 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 118660 42098SP 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 118661 274249 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 118662 761917 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 118663 CR757036 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 118664 CR728307 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 118665 761441 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 118880 CM761917 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 118881 760979 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 118882 761020 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 118883 CM743150 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 118884 762459 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 118885 762831 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 118886 763436 1F-- "530. REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION Gam"' R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 118423 8.33 NUTS 118424 25.69 EXHAUST CLAMPS 118425 24.45 VALVE CAPS Account No 136.30 INSULATORS 763939 63.17 LONG STROKE 118888- 29.07 VALVE REPAIR PARTS 62.25 GOVERNOR 1553.6530 150.14 SHOE KITS 768401 37.08 INDICATOR 118891 189.66 SPRINGS REPAIR PARTS 119.73 773765 275653 8/25/2005 REPAIR PARTS 101489 BROOKS, DARLENE 774146 324.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 118894 324.00 1553.6530 275654 8/2512005 118895 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 1553.6530 123.60 MERCHANDISE 780303 137.40 MERCHANDISE 125.40 MERCHANDISE 245.86 MERCHANDISE 246.30 MERCHANDISE 120.00 MERCHANDISE 125.03 MERCHANDISE 200.00 MERCHANDISE 204.49 MERCHANDISE 1.528.08 275655 8/25/2005 102046 CAMPE, HARRIET 200.00 PT MAINTENANCE 204.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 404.00 275656 8/25/2005 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 275657 8/25/2005 100681 CATCO 37.63 CONTROL HEAD 57.77 CABLE 95.40 118815 081805 5110.6103 118422 CITY OF EDINA 5440.5511 118423 Council Check Register 5440.5511 118424 8/25/2005 8/25/2005 118425 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 118887 763939 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 118888- 766462 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 118889 767878 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 118890 768401 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 118891 768879 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 118892 773765 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 118893 774146 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 118894 774123 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 118895 776759 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 118896 780303 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 118815 081805 5110.6103 118422 906351831 5440.5511 118423 906351833 5440.5511 118424 906386881 5440.5511 118425 905653501 5440.5511 118426 906036548 5440.5511 118427 906063814 5440.5511 118428 905735404 5440.5511 118429 906137178 5440.5511 118430 905976767 5440.5511 118816 081805 5111.6103 118816 081805 5110.6103 118697 41704 5842.5513 118551 3 -82145 1553.6530 118552 1 -60175 1553.6530 8/24/2005 8:19:27 'Page - 5 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 412.50 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR CITY OF EDINA 081605 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO - Council Check Register 8/25/2005 812512005 8/25/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 275658 8/25/2005 266.25 117187 CHEM SYSTEMS LTD 118635 00095603 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 174.02 DEODORIZER 118553 512984 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 174.02 275663 8125/2005 275659 8125/2005 101223 CITIES FORD 110.00 176.37 PUMP ASSEMBLY 118554 118777WFOW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS PUBLIC HEALTH 298.72 ALTERNATOR ASSEMBLY 118555 118791 WFOW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 79.88- CREDIT 118897 CM118777WFOW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 79.88- CREDIT 118898 CM118791WFOW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 92.60 CELL PHONE HOLDERS, BANDAIDS 79.88- CREDIT 118899 CM118417 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 106.50- CREDIT 118900 CM118268WFOW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 128.95 8/25/2005 101915 COUNTRY FLAGS 275660 8/25/2005 100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP. 94.79 FLAGS 118833 172.37 SPANNERS 118832 46806 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 94.79 172.37 275661 8/25/2005 8/25/2005 116304 CLAY, DON 100370 CRAGUN'S CONFERENCE CENTER 8/24/2005 8:19:27 Page - . 6 Business Unit ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION. GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN dI:7alddiwcl :IN 4:7_1I 412.50 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 118431 081605 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO - 412.50 275662 8/25/2005 100693 COMMERCIAL FURNITURE 266.25 CHAIR REPAIR 118635 00095603 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 266.25 275663 8125/2005 106229 COMMUNITY HEALTH CONFERENCE 110.00 SCHSAC MEETING 118634 081505 1490.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PUBLIC HEALTH 110.00 275664 8125/2005 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 92.60 CELL PHONE HOLDERS, BANDAIDS 118666 02638600 .1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 92.60 275665 8/25/2005 101915 COUNTRY FLAGS 94.79 FLAGS 118833 1833 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 94.79 275666 8/25/2005 100370 CRAGUN'S CONFERENCE CENTER 325.00 SCHSAC CONFERENCE 118636 081505 1490.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PUBLIC HEALTH 325.00 275667 8/25/2005 100712 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/25/2005 - 8/25/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 745.50 MAGNETIC LOCATOR 118556 3308055 5913.6556 TOOLS 745.50 275668 8/25/2005 5842.5514 116927 DAVIS SUN TURF 326672 5842.5514 424.98 DRIVESHAFT 5842.5515 118510 199.75 TINES, BOLTS, NUTS 118698 326671 624.73 118699 275669 8/25/2005 118700 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING 5822.5513 118701 19.85 5842.5514 118772 326669 3,073.33 118773 326668 5862.5514 19.80 197893 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 4,336.75 118559 197892 5421.5510 39.60 GRILL 118560 198219 805.23 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 304.00 138.50 65.80 1,663.70 10,466.56 275670 8/25/2005 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 25.12 WRENCHES 125.06 CREEPER SEAT, PULLERS 150.18 275671 8/2512005 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 32.33 BAKERY 37.54 BAKERY 87.16 BAKERY 53.17 BAKERY 35.25 BAKERY 47.78 BAKERY 39.25 BAKERY 89.52 BAKERY 76.44 BAKERY 498.44 275672 812512005 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST 19.53 127.15 146.68 118557 T104501 5422.6530 118558 T104944 5422.6530 118507 324721BAL 5842.5514 118508 326672 5842.5514 118509 326673 5842.5515 118510 325728 5862.5514 118698 326671 5822.5515 118699 326670 5822.5514 118700 326575 5822.5513 118701 326730 5842.5514 118772 326669 5862.5515 118773 326668 5862.5514 118667 793754 1553.6556 118668 793560 1553.6556 REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 8/2412005 8:19:27 Page - 7 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING' = TOOLS TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 118432 197429 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 118433 197632 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 118434 197631 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 118435 197630 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 118436 197776 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 118437 197816 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 118438 197893 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 118559 197892 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 118560 198219 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 118901 201980300 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 118901 201980300 5430.6188 TELEPHONE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE R55CKREG LOG20000 263.00 GOLF TEES 118439 CITY OF EDINA 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 263.00 Council Check Register 275677 8/2512005 8/25/2005 --8/25/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 275673 8/2512005 5110.6103 118556 DIAMOND, GARY ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 97.00 52.65 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 118864 082005 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 104868 DUNN, MATT 52.65 275674 8/25/2005 MAGIC CLASS, BALLOON CLASS 118650 DISTRICT #281 ROBBINSDALE AREA 081905 1624.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 4.70 DAILY ADMISSION REFUND 118637 081508 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE 72.30 DAILY ADMISSION REFUND 118637 081508 5301.4541 GENERAL ADMISSIONS 77.00 2,375.45 118702 275675 • 8/25/2005 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 108648 DOAN, SIIRI 648.92 118703 277226 48.10 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 118865 082005 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 48.10 275680 8/2512005 275676 8/25/2005 101691 DON BETZEN GOLF SUPPLY CO. 8/24/2005 8:19:27 Page- 8 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES 263.00 GOLF TEES 118439 19870 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 263.00 275677 8/2512005 117435 DUNCAN, PATRICIA 97.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 118440 081605 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 97.00 275678 8125/2005 104868 DUNN, MATT 615.00 MAGIC CLASS, BALLOON CLASS 118834 081905 1624.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 615.00 275679 8/25/2005 100739 EAGLE WINE 2,375.45 118702 277095 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 648.92 118703 277226 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,024.37 275680 8/2512005 100741 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 254.00 118441 14634 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 3,177.85 118511 327062 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 138.80 118561 216530 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 371.00 118562 14721 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 1,228.80 118704 325614 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,824.25 118705 327142 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 10,831.50 118774 327156 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 4,413.40 118775 327146 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 15.40, 118776 327144 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING ^55.00 CITY OF EDINA 8/24/2005 8:19:27 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 9 8/25/2005 --8/25/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 275681 8/25/2005 100742 ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION DIVISI 149.10 PEST CONTROL 118563 4841410 5630.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES 149.10 275682 8/25/2005 116448 EGAN OIL COMPANY 18,076.23 GAS 118442 107744 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 18,076.23 275683 8125/2005 118010 EGAN, BILL 255.60 BEAVER REMOVAL 118638 PO 6361 5422.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 255.60 275684 8/25/2005 104331 EILERS, JOYCE 41.60 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 118866 062005 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 41.60 275685 8/2512005 118654 EISLE, TIM 38.88 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 118669 081805 1623.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TENNIS INSTRUCTION 38.88 275686 8/25/2005 100549 ELECTRIC PUMP INC. 2.56 SHIM WASHERS 118670 0029386 -IN 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 2.56 275687 8125/2005 106194 EMA INC. 2,241.80 SCADA SYS SUPPORT 118443 5604- 90008949 03404.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT SCADA SANITARY SEWER 2,241.80 SCADA SYS SUPPORT 118443 5604- 90008949 05414.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT SCADA WATERMAIN 4,483.60 275688 8/25/2005 105944 EMANUEL, LOU 267.00 OFFICIATING FEES 118738 081905 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 267.00 275689 8/25/2005 101956 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANC 295.00 E-83 PUMP TEST 118835 22544 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 427.03 E-83 REPAIRS 118836 22497 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 434.87 E-82 PUMP TEST 118837 22543 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 411.69 T -90 PUMP TEST 118838 22545 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 295.00 E-81 PUMP TEST 118839 22542 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 764.64 T -90 SERVICE 118840 22546 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,628.23 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/25/2005 8/25/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 275690 8/25/2005 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC 1,398.40 MEDICATIONS 118841 INV737429 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 1,398.40 275691 8/25/2005 105339 ENRGI 1,125.00 WEBSITE CONSULTING 118444 3063 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT 1,880.00 WEBSITE CONSULTING 118445 3059 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT 1,826.25 WEBSITE CONSULTING 118446 3177 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT 1,135.00 WEBSITE CONSULTING 118447 3188 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT 5,966.25 275692 8/25/2005 117436 ERNST, MARCIA 315.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 118817 081805 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 315.00 275693 8/25/2005 100752 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC. 2,069.30 ADJUSTING RINGS, GLUE 118750 HH4117 5923.6530 REPAIR PARTS 2,069.30 275694 8/25/2005 100158 EXPLORE MINNESOTA GOLF ALLIANC 1,800.00 DUES 118448 070105 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 1,800.00 275695 8/25/2005 116872 EXTRACTOR CORPORATION 460.00 SWIMSUIT WATER EXTRACTOR 118639 05 -1050 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 460.00 275696 8/25/2005 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 50.04 BRAKE PADS 118671 6- 759837 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 115.91 BRAKE PADS 118672 6- 759887 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 527.37 BRAKE PADS 118673 6- 759795 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 693.32 275697 8/25/2005 113878 . FAMILY TIMES INC. 395.00 AD 118449 6428 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 395.00 275698 8/25/2005 100297 FAST FOTO & DIGITAL 10.66 PHOTO FINISHING 118842 T2- 209250 1470.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 21.30 PHOTO FINISHING 118843 T2- 208257 1470.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 91.96 8/24/2005 8:19:27 Page - 10 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COLLECTION SYSTEMS GOLF ADMINISTRATION POOL OPERATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/24/2005 8:19:27 Council Check Register Page - 11 8/25/2005 8/25/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 275699 8125/2005 102003 FASTSIGNS BLOOMINGTON 315.77 BICYCLE SIGNS 118751 190 -27560 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 14.70 SIGN CLIPS 118844 190 -27601 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 330.47 275700 8125/2005 100760 FOWLER ELECTRIC 8.61 REBUILD KIT 118564 61825200 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 11.32 REBUILD KIT 118902 61757600 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 10.42 REBUILD KIT 118903 61766700 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 10.42 REBUILD KIT 118904 61768500 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 40.77 275701 8125/2005 118657 FREEMAN, JILL .55 DAILY ADMISSION REFUND 118845 081905 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 8.45 DAILY ADMISSION REFUND 118845 081905 5301.4541 GENERAL ADMISSIONS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 9.00 275702 8/25 /2005 103039 FREY, MICHAEL 1,420.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 118450 081605 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,420.00 275703 8125/2005 108632 GALLES CORPORATION 1,102.49 CLEANING SUPPLIES 118846 109525 1470.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,102.49 275704 8/25/2005 113506 GEBO, ROBERT 200.25 OFFICIATING FEES 118674 081805 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 200.25 275705 8/2512005 101867 GETSINGER, DONNA 186.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 118818 081805 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 186.00 275706 8125/2005 101146 GLOBAL CROSSING TELECOMMUNICAT 213.47 118675 9010681181 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 213.47 275707 8/2512005 102645 GRAFFITI CONTROL SERVICES 1,990.00 STREET STRIPING REMOVAL 118676 00001306 1301.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1.990.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8125/2005 -- 8125/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 275708 8/2512005 101103 GRAINGER 539.13 SEWAGE PUMP, LAMPS 118451 495-064077 -3 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS 8/24/2005 8:19:27 Page - . 12 Business Unit CLUB HOUSE 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE I 50TH ST SELLING 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW REVOLVING 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 539.13 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR _ 50TH ST SELLING. -_ 275709 812512005 YORK SELLING 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 854.00 5842.5512 118706 74868 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 854.00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 275710 8/2512005 VERNON SELLING 101518 GRAUSAM; STEVE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 60.35 CELL PHONE CHARGES 118911 082205 60.35 275711 8/25/2005 101350 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO. 27.67 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 118752 052397 27.67 275712 8/2512005 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 30.60 118707 277121 980.09 118708 277122 178.70 118709 277110 2.55 118710 277166 4,386.82 118711 277109 25.00- 118712 673166 2,140.41 118777 277138 2,048.75 118778 274080 .85 118779 273843 1,266.49 118780 274081 11,010.26 275713 8 /25/2005 100787 GRUBER'S POWER EQUIPMENT 119.82 MOWING SUPPLIES 118565 24550 119.82 275714 8/25/2005 100799 HEDBERG AGGREGATES 27.70. ENGRAVED PAVER 118566 372654 27.70 275715 8/25/2005 101576 HEGGIES PIZZA 70.70 PIZZA 118452 .157324 70.70 275716 8/25/2005 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 8/24/2005 8:19:27 Page - . 12 Business Unit CLUB HOUSE 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE I 50TH ST SELLING 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW REVOLVING 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR _ 50TH ST SELLING. -_ 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 5400.2072 MEN'S CLUB GOLF BALANCE SHEET 5421.5510 1 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/25/2005 -8/25/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 205.44 MEAT PATTIES 118453 018525 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 368.08 MEAT PATTIES 118567 018548 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 573.52 275717 8/2512005 101503 HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS 19.50 FILING FEE 118643 8623152 2127.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 19.50 275718 8125/2005 114507 HERMAN'S LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES 23.64 PAVERS 118640 17620 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,706.13 BLOCK WALL #19 118641 17077 5422.6406 _ GENERAL SUPPLIES 136.32 BLOCK WALL #19 118642 17738 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,866.09 275719 8125/2005 118559 HILL, JESSICA 105.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 118819 081805 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 105.00 275720 8/25/2005 103753 HILLYARD - 184.31 VACUUM MOTOR 118568 M01745550 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 27.34 VACUUM HOSE 118753 MP1746758 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 211.65 275721 8/25/2005 118463 HIPP, LILLIAN 35.75 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 118867 082005 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 35.75 275722 8/2512005 104881 HJERMSTED, AARON 110.97 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 118677 081805 1623.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 110.97 275723 8/2512005 118506 HODGES, LAUREN 456.64 INSTRUCTOR AC 118820 081805 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 456.64 275724 8/25/2005 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 446.90 118512 366236 5862.5514 446.90 275725 8125/2005 105461 ROLL, SHELLEY 264.37 INSTRUCTOR AC 118821 081805 5110.6103 264.37 8/24/2005 8:19:27 Page - . 13 Business Unit GRILL GRILL COMM DEV BLK GRANT CENTENNIAL LAKES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION POOL OPERATION POOL OPERATION ART CENTER REVENUES TENNIS INSTRUCTION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/2512005 -- 8/25/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 275726 8/2512005 116191 INSTY- PRINTS 522.96 NEWSLETTER 118569 70612 2210.6575 PRINTING 1470.6406 5311.6103 5110.6564 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5512 5842.5513 5842.5514 5862.5512 5862.5512 5862.5512 5862.5512 5862.5512 5862.5512 5822.5512 5822.5513 5822.5513 5822.5513 5311.6406 1400.6203 GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CRAFT SUPPLIES 8/24/2005 8:19:27 Page - 14 Business Unit COMMUNICATIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POOL OPERATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 522.96 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 275727 8125/2005 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 101861 J.H. LARSON COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 214.44 CONNECTORS, PLUGS 118678 4494480 -01 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 214.44 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 275728 8/25/2005 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 102157 JEFF ELLIS & ASSOCIATES INC. COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 321.00 LIFEGUARD LICENSES 118570 20022023 321.00 275729 8/2512005 100828 JERRY'S FOODS 75.94 118905 2226 75.94 275730 8/25/2005 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 42.25 118513 1941844 3,358.96 118514 1941840 1,110.45 118515 1942273 1,038.15 118516 1941845 13.99 118781 1945227 482.70 118782 1942274 617.25 118783 1942275 1,591.06 118784 1941849 452.65 118785 1941851 974.82 118786 1941848 954.50 118787 1941838 1,123.51 118788 1945216 235.52 118789 1945215 63.90 118790 1945217 434.60 118791 1945218 12,494.31 275731 8/25/2005 118336 JONES AND BARTLETT PUBLISHERS 181.00 LIFEGUARD BOOKS 118571 1183382 181.00 275732 8/25/2005 104369 KARKHOFF, NANCY 43.96 UNIFORM PURCHASE 118454 081605 13.96 1470.6406 5311.6103 5110.6564 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5512 5842.5513 5842.5514 5862.5512 5862.5512 5862.5512 5862.5512 5862.5512 5862.5512 5822.5512 5822.5513 5822.5513 5822.5513 5311.6406 1400.6203 GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CRAFT SUPPLIES 8/24/2005 8:19:27 Page - 14 Business Unit COMMUNICATIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POOL OPERATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 118517 CITY OF EDINA 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,973.10 118518 Council Check Register 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 68.00 118792 8/25/2005 -- 8/2512005 5822.5515 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 275733 812512005 101760 KOOLMO CONSTRUCTION INC. 1,576.40 95,215.00 PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT 118847 264 47039.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 95,215.00 275734 8125/2005 69.51 102099 KOSS PAINT COMPANY INC. 118679 3508711 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 79.84 PAINT 118455 65863 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 118680 3508710 79.84 REPAIR PARTS 275735 8/25/2005 100846 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO 8/24/2005 8:19:27 Page - 15 Business Unit KOJETIN PARK PLAYGROUND CLUB HOUSE 32.00 118517 444219 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,973.10 118518 444218 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 68.00 118792 444812 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1512.70 118793 444813 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING TREES & MAINTENANCE COLLECTION SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL TURF CARE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES 5,585.80 275736 8125/2005 100847 KUNDE CO INC 1,576.40 TREE DISEASE INSPECTION 118572 14096 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,576.40 275737 8/2512005 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 69.51 CABLE TIES, TY -RAP 118679 3508711 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 368.23 HEX NUTS, HOLESAW 118680 3508710 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 437.74 275738 8/25/2005 100853 LEEF SERVICES 31.82 SHOP TOWELS 118573 438695 5422.6201 LAUNDRY 31.82 275739 812512005 100855 LESCO INC. 74.55 WEED SPRAYERS 118574 12900784 1643.6546 WEED SPRAY 74.55 275740 8/25.12005 117407 LEXISNEXIS 110.00 BACKGROUND CHECKS 118456 0507220271 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 110.00 275741 8/25/2005 116882 LIPPERT, BARBARA 96.20 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 118868 082005 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 96.20 275742 8/25/2005 100857 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC. TREES & MAINTENANCE COLLECTION SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL TURF CARE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES CITY OF EDINA 8/24/2005 8:19:27 R55CKREG LOG20000 . Council Check Register Page - 16 8/25/2005 -8/25/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,767.90 CASTER WHEELS 118681 00034120 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 132.46 HOOKS 118682 00034121 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN. 1,900.36 275743 812512005 105922 LORENSON, JEFF 30.00 SOFTBALL GIFT CERTIFICATE 118644 081605 4077.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 30.00 275744 8125/2005 100443 LUCHT, PETE 104.35 UNIFORM PURCHASE 118683 081805 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 104.35 275745 8/25/2005 100861 LYNDALE GARDEN CENTER 30.86 PLANTS 118754 868619 5630.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES 30.86 275746 8/25/2005 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 750.59 118713 185384 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 750.59 275747 8/25/2005 100864 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. 339.38 ALUM TUBING, HOSE GUIDES 118575 2055075 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 138.14 TUBE ALUMINUM 118755 2055076 5920.6530 REPAIR PARTS SEWER CLEANING 477.52 �- 275748 8/25/2005 100865 MAGNUSON SOD 53.25 SOD, DIRT 118457 073105 5630.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES 179.99 SOD, DIRT 118457 073105 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 392.53 SOD, DIRT 118457 073105 1643.6543 SOD 8 BLACK DIRT GENERAL TURF CARE 569.99 SOD, DIRT 118457 073105 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 1,195.76 275749 8125/2005 101451 MAKELA, BARB 82.50 INSTRUCTOR AC 118822 081805 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 82.50 . 275750 8/25/2005 102981 MARATHON ASHLAND PETROLEUM LLC 90.00 TRAILER FEE 118684 097374 1314.6519 ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION 3,579.43 CRS -2 EMULSION 118685 910098 1314.6519 ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION 3,669.43 275751 8/25/2005 100868 MARK VII SALES e R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation 3,280.20 2,264.00 2,398.25 3,902.75 18.40 688.02 112.80 275752 8125/2005 CITY OF EDINA 100870 MATRX 8/24/2005 8:19:27 621.11 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 44832 621.11 GENERAL SUPPLIES 275753 8125/2005 -8/25/2005 117419 MCGLYNN, KELLY 5410.6406 28.60 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC Account No 28.60 Business Unit 275754 8/25/2005 833148 101483 MENARDS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 95.34 LUMBER 831101 109.44 BLOCK ADHESIVE VERNON SELLING 49.20 TRASH CANS, BASKETS 5862.5514 38.21 SAKRETE CONCRETE MIX 118522 161.87 CHAINSAW, WEED KILLER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 454.06 118523 275755 8125/2005 5842.5515 101987 MENARDS YORK SELLING 179.26 DRILL 5842.5514 27.45 PLIERS, CONNECTOR 118795 206.71 5862.5515 275756 8/25/2005 VERNON SELLING 100882 MERIT SUPPLY 833870 857.86 WYPALL, LINERS VERNON SELLING 969.15 WYPALL, TISSUE, TOWELS 5822.5514 1,827.01 50TH ST SELLING 275757 8/25/2005 899187 101390 MES INC. FIRST AID SUPPLIES 1,595.50 MASTER STREAM 1,595.50 275758 8/2512005 100410 METROCALL 118869 082005 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 118576 CITY OF EDINA 1301.6406 8/24/2005 8:19:27 GENERAL MAINTENANCE Council Check Register 44832 Page - 17 GENERAL SUPPLIES 8125/2005 -8/25/2005 50591 5410.6406 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 118519 833148 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 118520 831101 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 118521 833147 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 118522 833398 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 118523 833399 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 118794 835876 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 118795 833871 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 118796 833870 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 118797 834967 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 118848 899187 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 118869 082005 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 118576 50321 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 118577 44832 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 118578 50591 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 118579 50573 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 118686 51197 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET REVOLVING 118580 15508 5630.6556 TOOLS CENTENNIAL LAKES 118756 15361 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 118581 67538 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 118582 67537 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 118849 299346 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 812512005 --8/2512005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 361.89 PAGERS 118458 A0319246H 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8/24/2005 8:19:27 Page - 18 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES CITY HALL GENERAL 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5422.6581 361.89 MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 5422.6581 GASOLINE 275759 8/25/2005 5424.6406 102508 METZGER, MAURE ANN RANGE 5422.6581 GASOLINE 36.40 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 118870 082005 1551.6406 36.40 CITY HALL GENERAL 275760 8/25/2005 116753 MGS PROFESSIONAL BUILDING MAIN 3,145.00 WINDOW CLEANING 118583 18031 3,145.00 275761 8/25/2005 100692 MIDWEST COCA -COLA EAGAN 215.50 118798 80600079 215:50 275762 8/25/2005 103186 MIDWEST FUELS 540.17 FUEL 118584 27884 295.20 FUEL 118585 28112 530.37 FUEL 118586 28110 1,041.09 FUEL 118587 27883 462.37 GENERATOR FUEL 118645 28113 732.48 GENERATOR FUEL 118645 28113 3,601.68 275763 8/25/2005 101890 MIDWEST VENDING INC 281.20 CANDY 118459 3750 281.20 275764 8/25/2005 118504 MILLER, HAYLEY 76.88 INSTRUCTOR AC 118823 081805 76.88 275765 8/25/2005 100913 MINNEAPOLIS SUBURBAN SEWER &W 1,440.00. WATER SERVICE REPAIR 118460 32721 1,260.00 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 118461 32722 1,440.00 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 118462 32723 1,260.00 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 118757. 32725 5,400.00 275766 8/2512005 102770 MINNESOTA CASTERS INC. 184.79, CASTERS 118588 INV25708 79 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8/24/2005 8:19:27 Page - 18 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES CITY HALL GENERAL 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION CENTENNIAL LAKES CITY OF EDINA 8/24/2005 8:19:27 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 19 8/25/2005 8/25/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 275767 812512005 101912 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICU 40.00 FOOD SAFETY CONFERENCE 118758 081905 4204.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS HEALTH ALERT NETWORK 40.00 275768 8125/2005 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 18,225.00 CONNECTION FEE 118759 081605 5915.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER WATER TREATMENT 18,225.00 275769 8/25/2005 100905 MINNESOTA GOLF ASSOCIATION 9.00 GHIN FEES 118463 45- 150 -20- 8/05 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 234.00 GHIN FEES 118464 45- 150 -21 -8/05 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 324.00 GHIN FEES 118465 45- 150 -13- 8/05 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 1,170.00 GHIN FEES 118466 45- 150 -16- 8/05 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 1,737.00 275770 8/25/2005 101376 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT 2,173.67 CURB STOPS 118467 0172633 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 2,006.39 HYD EXTENSION KITS 118760 0173103 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 4,180.06 275771 812512005 100159 MOOERS PRINTING INC. 771.06 LETTERHEAD 118850 4107 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 771.06 275772 8125/2005 102395 MDSE, WILLIAM 422.75 OFFICIATING FEES 118739 081905 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 422.75 275773 8125/2005 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 179.15 TAILGATE 118589 490420 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 144.18 PULL FRAME 118590 490442 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 396.28 SERVICE ASSEMBLIES 118591 490019 -00 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 591.47 STEERING KIT 118592 490207 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,311.08 275774 8/25/2005 100012 NATIONAL WATERWORKS INC. 52.06 CURB STOP WRENCH 118468 2635392 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 52.06 275775 812512005 101958 NICOL, JANET 407.50 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 118824 081805 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 300763479 -001 5410.6513 407.50 301118839 -001 275776 8/25/2005 301118854 -001 117423, O'BRIEN, CHIAKI 118593 301850410 -001 57.85 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 57.85 275777 8/25/2005 118651 O'CONNELL, FABIAN 432.85 COURSE STATUS SIGN 432.85 275778 8/2512005 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 23.88 WASTECANS 42.50 INK 5.33 WASTEBASKETS 34.89 USB PORT 7.90 TAGS 114.50 275779 8/25/2005 105612 OFFICE TEAM 645.75 SARA ST. JAMES - TEMP 645.75 275780 8125/2005 100938 OLYMPIC POOLS 325.89 SOLENOID VALVE 325.89 275781 8/2512005. 101659 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 27.15 PEST CONTROL 27.15 275782 8125/2005 100939. OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC. 194.68 COOKIES 194.68 275783 8125/2005 117813 OUSLEY, JASON 221.00 INSTRUCTOR - MODEL 221.00 275784 812512005 103391 PARK TAVERN 28.00 SOFTBALL GIFT CERTIFICATE 28.00 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/25/2005 --8/25/2005 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 118858 082005 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 118646 081005 5422.6251 118469 300935929- 001 5410.6513 118470 300763479 -001 5410.6513 118471 301118839 -001 5410.6513 118472 301118854 -001 5410.6513 118593 301850410 -001 5410.6406 118473 13886979 1400.6103 118594 42046 118595 14202176 118474 14459353 118475 081605 118647 081605 5630.6530 1551.6180 5421.5510 5110.6103 4077.6406 8/24/2005 8:19:27 Page - , 20 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES SHARED MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8124/2005 8:19:27 Council Check Register Page - 21 8/25/2005 - 8/2512005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 275785 8/25/2005 102440 PASS, GRACE 297.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 118825 081805 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 364.00 PT MAINTENANCE 118825 081805 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 661.00 275786 8/25/2005 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 1,358.70 118714 8078859 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 9.37- 118715 8066926 -PP 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,349.33 275787 8/25/2005 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 237.25 118476 77104279 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 1,535.00 118477 03854307 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 2,166.95 118478 76348502 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 183.60 118596 04271547 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 4,122.80 275788 8/25/2005 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 668.05 118524 2228662 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING = 1,221.65 118525 2228663 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6.99- 118526 3322779 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6.67- 118527 3322776 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6.67- 118528 3322777 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4.67- 118529 3322778 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 11.11- 118530 3322775 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK-SELLING 96.95- 118531 3322817 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,198.80 118799 2231185 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 146.85 118800 2231181 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 388.20 118801 2231184 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 163.05 118802 2231188 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 100.95 118803 2228666 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 108.20 118804 2231179 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,387.40 118805 2231180 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5,250.09 275789 8/25/2005 101110 POLLY NORMAN PHOTOGRAPHY 100.00 TRAFFIC REPORT PHOTOS 118597 081305 2210.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 100.00 275790 8/2512005 102350 POLO RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION 60.38 MERCHANDISE 118479 125636 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 60.38 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 275791 8/25/2005 Amount SuoDlier / E%Dlanation 106152 POWERPLAN 73.54 FILTERS 73.54 275792 8/25/2005 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 747.34 3,959.31 1,213.62 5,920.27 275793 8/2512005 102354 PRO GUARD SPORTS INC. 87.53 CLEAR ROLLS 87.53 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/25/2005 -- 812512005 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 118648 169521 118716 277227 118717 277225 118718 277228 118598 251046 275794 8/25/2005 116481 PUTTING GREENS OF MINNESOTA 2,311.05 EZ TEE MATS 118913 107 2,550.68 EZ TEE MATS 118913 107 4,861.73 1553.6530 5822.5513 5862.5513 5842.5513 5510.5510 5210.6590 5424.6590 REPAIR PARTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD RANGE BALLS - RANGE BALLS 8124/2005 8:19:27 Page - 22 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING ARENA ADMINISTRATION GOLF DOME PROGRAM RANGE 275795 8/25/2005 100971 QUALITY WINE 11.12- 118532 590153 -00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 1,126.58 118532 590153 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 30.82- CREDIT ON ACCT 118533 EDINA #3 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 196.92- CREDIT ON ACCT 118534 EDINA #1 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE .50TH ST SELLING 26.42-, CREDIT ON ACCT 118535 EDINA #2 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 12.83- 118719 591816 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 1,298.68 118719 591816 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 28.94- 118720 591698 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 2,935.70 118720 591698 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5.68- 118721 591235 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 577.70 118721 591235 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 10.17- 118722 591166 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 1,028.09 118722 591166 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 6.08- 118723. 591704 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 306.94 118723 591704 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 71.58- 118724 591702 -00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 3,609.83 118724 591702 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 12.57- 118725 591697 -00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 1,276.40 118725 591697 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 8.84- 118726 591814 -00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL x,02 118726 591814 -00 513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/24/2005 8:19:27 Council Check Register Page - 23 8/25/2005 - 8/25/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 107.00 118727 591815 -00 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 36.45- 118806 591703 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 1,835.53 118806 591703 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 57.98- 118807 588879 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 2,918.89 118807 588879 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 228- 118808 584363 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 227.58 118808 584363 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4.00- 118809 588570 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 19.16- 118810 588298 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 17,603.10 275796 8/25/2005 101965 QWEST 105.89 952 451 -6058 118912 6058 -8/05 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 105.89 275797 8/25/2005 102631 REAMER, MARK 979.00 OFFICIATING FEES 118741 081905 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 979.00 275798 8125/2005 118658 RIGHTWAY GLASS INC. 253.65 WINDSHIELD REPAIR 118906 34323 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 205.40 WINDSHIELD REPAIR 118907 34905 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 459.05 275799 8/25/2005 118659 RNR HOME IMPROVEMENT LLC 9,475.60 HOME IMPROVEMENTS 118910 63 2127.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMM DEV BILK GRANT 9,475.60 275800 8/25/2005 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 532.50 SOFTENER SALT 118687 00166579 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 532.50 275801 8125/2005 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 105.44 PARTS WASHER CHANGE OUT 118688 MB01427236 1280.6271 HAZ. WASTE DISPOSAL SUPERVISION 8 OVERHEAD 105.44 275802 8/25/2005 101634 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPANY 74.59 BAKERY 118480 131067 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 34.81 BAKERY 118481 131753 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 109.40 275803 8/25/2005 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT R55CKREG LOG20000 COST OF GOODS SOLD 165.06 CITY OF EDINA FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 275804 8 /2512005 BUILDING MAINTENANCE _ Council Check Register GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1646.6577 LUMBER 8/25/2005 - 8/25/2005 118599 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 52.56 101 - 25373069350 118482 080905 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 49.87 101- 26373069350 118689 081105 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 26.93 101- 26373069350 118690 080105 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 35.70 101- 26373069350 118690 080105 1623.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 812412005 8:19:27 Page - 24 Business Unit VANV ALncrvounv VANVALKENBURG TENNIS INSTRUCTION _ 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 165.06 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 275804 8 /2512005 BUILDING MAINTENANCE _ 104788 SANDY'S PROMOTIONAL STUFF GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1646.6577 LUMBER 544.28 NOTE PADS W /HOLDERS 118599 SH5108 5422.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES 544.28 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 275805 8/25/2005 POOL OPERATION 100305 SARA LEE COFFEE & TEA 589.65 COFFEE 118483 9542812 589.65 275806 8/25/2005 118168 SCAN HEALTH INC. 1,100.33 EMS REPORTING 118851 INVO02369 1,100.33 275807 8/25/2005 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 64.54 CEMENT FORMS 118600 40143117 32.80 CONCRETE MIX 118601 40147483 265.72 LUMBER 118602 40147484 5.97 CEMENT FORMS 118603 40144904 369.03 275808 8/25/2005 101970 SCOTT COUNTY NURSERY INC 800.00 MULCH 118649 D30204 800.00 275809 8/2512005 105550 SCRAP METAL PROCESSORS INC. 150.00 AUG CONTAINER CHARGE 118691 D- COIE5 -8 150.00 275810 8/25/2005 101893 SCS INTERACTIVE INC. 614.03. SLIDE SECTION 118650 5608 614.03 _ 275811 8/25/2005 102644 SEABOARD PENCIL COMPANY 539.55 PENCILS 118484 4859 539.55 275812 8/25/2005 112875 SECOND FOUNDATION SCHOOL. 812412005 8:19:27 Page - 24 Business Unit VANV ALncrvounv VANVALKENBURG TENNIS INSTRUCTION _ 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE _ 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 5422.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 5410.6406 . GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 812512005 -8/25/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 63.70 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 118871 082005 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 8/24/2005 8:19:27 Page- 25 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 1624.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 5842.5514 5842.5515 5822.5514 5822.5515 5610.6122 5111.6103 5110.6103 5101.4413 5822.5513 5410.6575 451.97 MERCHANDISE 118486 PSI -053614 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX ADVERTISING OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART WORK SOLD YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING ED ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 63.70 275813 8/2512005 118069 SIJAY DESIGNS 73.45 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 118872 082005 73.45 275814 8125/2005 116501 SIMONSON, JUSTIN 111.83 ZIP LINE ROPE 118651 081605 111.83 275815 8/25/2005 106415 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY 1,188.00 MINI -HAWK EVENT FEE 118485 452 1,188.00 275816 8/25/2005 101002 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS INC 5,506.60 118728 169379 69.10 118729 169380 277.30 118730 169376 35.95 118731 169377 5,888.95 275817 8/25/2005 118343 SOUTHWEST NEWSPAPERS 48.00 312249 ADVERTISING 118604 07/2005 48.00 275818 8/25/2005 110977 SOW, ADAMA 258.00 CLEANING 118826 081805 1,147.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 118826 081805 133.90 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 118873 082005 1,538.90 275819 8/25/2005 116682 SPECIALTY WINE & BEVERAGES 122.00 118811 4050 122.00 275820 8/2512005 102424 SPEEDY PRINT 2,141.18 GOLF SCORECARDS 118652 55091 2,141.18 275821 8125/2005 101462 SPORT HALEY INC. 8/24/2005 8:19:27 Page- 25 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 1624.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 5842.5514 5842.5515 5822.5514 5822.5515 5610.6122 5111.6103 5110.6103 5101.4413 5822.5513 5410.6575 451.97 MERCHANDISE 118486 PSI -053614 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX ADVERTISING OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART WORK SOLD YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING ED ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/25/2005 — 8/25/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 451.97 275822 8/25/2005 101004 SPS COMPANIES 12.92 UNION 118487 S1288142.001 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 60.49 SWT GATE, VALVE 118488 S1287872.001 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/24/2005 8:19:27 Page - 26 Business Unit COLLECTION SYSTEMS COLLECTION SYSTEMS 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 73.41 1400.6551 AMMUNITION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 275823 8/25/2005 SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY 113490 STERLING FENCE INC. CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES 22.36 FENCE TIES 118605 081505 22.36 275824 8/25/2005 101015 STREICHERS 357.86 AMMO 118489 1286651 357.86 275825 8/25/2005 101019 SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY 1,500.00 2ND HALF MEMBERSHIP 118606 080105 1,500.00 275826 8/25/2005 118656 SUBURBAN SEAMLESS 375.00 GUTTER REPAIRS 118852 080505 375.00 275827 8/25/2005 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. 383.10 TIRES 118692 10041271 383.10 275828 8/2512005 118653 SWEDEBRO 1,000.00 TEST AREA MATERIALS 118693 SW081705 1,000.00 275829 8/25/2005 116868 SWENSON, SUSAN 34.45 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 118874 082005 34.45 275830 8/2512005 100169 TEJAS 56.00 SOFTBALL GIFT CERTIFICATE 118737 081805 56.00 275831 8/25/2005 101034 THOMSEN & NYBECK 835.36 PROSECUTING - YEAZIZW 118490 12254 '5.36 8/24/2005 8:19:27 Page - 26 Business Unit COLLECTION SYSTEMS COLLECTION SYSTEMS 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1400.6551 AMMUNITION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1506.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 4077.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/24/2005 8:19:27 Council Check Register Page - 27 8/25/2005 -8/25/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 275832 8/25/2005 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 373.75 118491 382311 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 426.00 118492 18799 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 182.00 118493 18764 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 4,422.30 118536 382530 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 121.00 118537 382783 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 213.75 118607 383107 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 446.00 118608 18893 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 27.50 118812 383120 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 6,212.30 275833 8/25/2005 103366 TIME WARNER CABLE 319.00 CABLE TV ADVERTISING 118853 179963 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING - 319.00 CABLE TV ADVERTISING 118853 179963 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 319.00 CABLE TV ADVERTISING 118853 179963 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 957.00 275834 8/25/2005 114701 TIME WARNER CABLE 99.95 0408191 -01 CABLE 118609 081005 5430.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 99.95 275835 8/25/2005 101474 TITLEIST 820.33 MERCHANDISE 118494 2526820 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 761.40 MERCHANDISE 118495 2545294 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,581.73 275836 8/25/2005 102742 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLAN 440.50 LEAK LOCATING 118761 000200502984 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 440.50 275837 8/25/2005 112965 TOP FLITE GOLF CO., THE 555.00 MERCHANDISE 118496 54406762 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 555.00 275838 8/25/2005 101693 TOTAL REGISTER 14.20 MONTHLY FTP FILE 118762 18637 5820.6160 DATA PROCESSING 50TH STREET GENERAL 14.20 MONTHLY FTP FILE 118762 18637 5840.6160 DATA PROCESSING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 14.20 MONTHLY FTP FILE 118762 18637 5860.6160 DATA PROCESSING VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 42.60 275839 8/25 /2005 101374 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE CITY OF EDINA 8/24/2005 8:19:27 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 28 812512005 -- 8/25/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,325.00 FENCE INSTALLATION 118610 18278 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 2,325.00 275840 8/25 12005 103982 TRAFFIC CONTROL CORPORATION 430.26 4T REPAIR 118611 17160 1330.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS TRAFFIC SIGNALS 430.26 275841 8/25/2005 103153 TREUTING, KRISTEN 40.30 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 118875 082005 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 40.30 275842 8/25/2005 100682 TRUGREEN- CHEMLAWN 143.78 LAWN MAINTENANCE 118653 299683 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 399.38 LAWN MAINTENANCE 118654 299323 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 543.16 275843 8/2512005 101045 TURF SUPPLY COMPANY 451.77 BALL WASHER, BRUSHES 118612 098253 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 681.60 FUNGICIDE 118613 098254 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,133.37 275844 8/25/2005 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 575.10 SEED 118614 12759 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 575.10 275845 8/25/2005 101049 UHL COMPANY - 1,891.40 ELEMENT 118694 16390 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,891.40 275846 8/25/2005 101053 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY 181.21 SENSORS 118615 432181 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 20.80 FUSES, CLAMP METER 118616 438061 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 43.20 FUSES, CLAMP METER 118616 438061 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 150.96 FUSES, CLAMP METER 118616 438061 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 396.17 275847 812512005 100371 UNITED RENTALS 2,434.72 CURB FORMS, COMPRESSOR 118908 49086689 -001 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,434.72 275848 8/25 /2005 101908 US FOODSERVICE INC 48.84 CUST 114300 118617 080105 °' "' 6511 . CLEANING SUPPLIES GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 4,928.53 CITY OF EDINA 275849 Council Check Register 103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 8/25/2005 -- 8/25/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 237.80 CUST 114300 118617 080105 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 3,837.42 CUST 114300 118617 080105 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 125.09 CLEANING SUPPLIES 118618 33530309 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 579.38 CONCESSION PRODUCT 118618 33530309 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES MEN'S CLUB CONTRACTED REPAIRS ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8/24/2005 8:19:27 Page - 29 Business Unit GRILL POOL OPERATION POOL CONCESSIONS DISTRIBUTION GRILL GRILL YORK SELLING YORK SELLING GOLF BALANCE SHEET RANGE 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING GOLF CARS CENT SVC PW BUILDING TRAFFIC SIGNALS PSTF OCCUPANCY 4,928.53 275849 8/25/2005 103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 461.00 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 118763 9782 5913.6180 461.00 275850 8/2512005 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 287.50 TISSUE, CUPS 118497 594669 5421.6406 69.76 TISSUE 118619 595104 5421.6406 396.71 BAGS 118655 595102 5842.6512 19.97- CREDIT 118656 594991 5842.6512 734.00 275851 8/25/2005 118649 VANTAGE CUSTOM CLASSICS 90.30 GOLF SHIRTS 118657 2387841 5400.2072 90.30 275852 8/25/2005 101060 VANTAGE ELECTRIC 1,763.00 REWIRE FUEL PUMP 118620 18236 5424.6180 1,763.00 275853 8/25/2005 101610 VERIZON DIRECTORIES CORP. 122.33 DIRECTORY AD 118854 390010100179 5822.6122 122.33 DIRECTORY AD 118854 390010100179 5842.6122 122.34 DIRECTORY AD 118854 390010100179 5862.6122 367.00 275854 8125/2005 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 98.62 BRAKE DRUMS 118621 20466 5423.6530 98.62 275855 8/25/2005 101786 VIDEO PROTECTION SERVICES 148.00 REPAIRS 118622 3762 1552.6530 148.00 275856 8/25/2005 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 168.70 LIGHTING 118623 15020917 -02 1330.6530 290.88 LIGHTING 118623 15020917 -02 7411.6103 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES MEN'S CLUB CONTRACTED REPAIRS ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8/24/2005 8:19:27 Page - 29 Business Unit GRILL POOL OPERATION POOL CONCESSIONS DISTRIBUTION GRILL GRILL YORK SELLING YORK SELLING GOLF BALANCE SHEET RANGE 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING GOLF CARS CENT SVC PW BUILDING TRAFFIC SIGNALS PSTF OCCUPANCY R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/25/2005 -8/25/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description ART WORK SOLD RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH,REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL ART WORK SOLD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 8/24/2005 8:19:27 Page - 30 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK FIRE STATION ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT LITTER REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY SENIOR CITIZENS LITTER REMOVAL CITY HALL GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE GROUNDS LITTER REMOVAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS POOL OPERATION GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING CLUB -HOUSE EDINBOROUGH PARK ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING 459.58 275857 812512005 102457 WALTON, DANIEL 26.00 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 118876 082005 5101.4413 26.00 275858 8/25/2005 103466 WASTE MANAGEMENT - SAVAGE MN 37.80 118764 321385922828 5821.6182 40.30 118764 321385922828 1481.6182 41.52 118764 321385922828 5111.6182 65.85 118764 321385922828 1645.6182 70.52 118764 321385922828 1470.6182 81.52 118764 321385922828 5430.6182 82.64 118764 321385922828 5841.6182 82.75 118764 321385922828 5861.6182 97.52 118764 321385922828 1628.6182 155.21 118764 321385922828 1645.6182 179.55 118764 321385922828 1551.6182 192.91 118764 321385922828 5422.6182 208.25 118764 321385922828 1645.6182 239.29 118764 321385922828 5511.6182 242.58 118764 321385922828 5311.6182 305.71 118764 321385922828 1301.6182 305.71 118764 321385922828 1552.6182 385.69 118764 321385922828 5420.6182 490.51 118764 321385922828 5620.6182 3,305.83 275859 8/25/2005 116307 WESTERDAHL, WILLIAM 26.00 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 118877 082005 5101.4413 26.00 275860 8/25/2005 104334 WHITING, SARAH 216.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 118827 081805 5110.6103 216.00 275861 8/25/2005 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 1,133.80 118732 121872 -00. 5862.5513 717.35 118733 121875 -00 5822.5513 564.05 118734 121879 -00 5842.5513 2,415.20 ART WORK SOLD RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH,REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL ART WORK SOLD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 8/24/2005 8:19:27 Page - 30 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK FIRE STATION ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT LITTER REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY SENIOR CITIZENS LITTER REMOVAL CITY HALL GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE GROUNDS LITTER REMOVAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS POOL OPERATION GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING CLUB -HOUSE EDINBOROUGH PARK ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation 275862 8/2512005 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 167.40 9a nn. CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 812512005 —8/25/2005 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 118538 131785 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 118539 25433 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 118813 132357 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 275863 8/25/2005 117482 WINECONNECT INC. 1,303.56 WINE KIOSK 118855 207 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,303.56 WINE KIOSK 118856 208 5842.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 1,303.56 WINE KIOSK 118857 209 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 3,910.68 275864 8/25/2005 112954 WISCONSIN TURF EQUIPMENT CORP. 20.28 WASHERS, BUSHING 118695 517903 -000 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 20.28 275865 8/25/2005 101082 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY 50.80 GOLF BALLS 118765 127795 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50.80 275866 8/25/2005 100591 WITTSTRUCK, MARTHA 25.35 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 118878 082005 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 25.35 275867 8/25/2005 102019 WOIT, DIANE 26.00 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 118879 082005 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 26.00 275868 8/25/2005 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 265.00 118735 167924 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,492.75 118736 167848 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 389.00 118814 167970 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 2,146.75 275869 8/25/2005 101726 XCEL ENERGY 3,145.15 51- 6227619 -3 118499 37336084 5630.6185 LIGHT & POWER 4,127.65 51- 5619094 -8 118500 36811541 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER 1,518.62 51- 5847121 -5 118766 37675691 5914.6185 LIGHT & POWER 4,221.48 51- 6621207 -1 118767 37697559 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER 69.64 51- 5276505 -8 118909 37861453 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER 13,082.54 8/24/2005 8:19:27 Page - 31 Business Unit YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTENNIAL LAKES ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING CENTENNIAL LAKES CENT SVC PW BUILDING TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR DISTRIBUTION TRAFFIC SIGNALS R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # 275870 8/25/2005 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 397.82 JULY USAGE 397.82 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/25/2005 -- 8/2512005 Doc No Inv No Account No 118498 011648945 1400.6230 8/24/2005 8:19:27 Page - 32 Subledger Account Description Business Unit SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 448,138.04 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 448,138.04 Total Payments 448,138.04 R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/24/2005 15:48:43 Council Check Summary Page - 1 8/25/2005 - 8/25/2005 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 79,226.83 02100 CDBG FUND 9,495.10 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 12,793.59 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 99,583.84 05100 ART CENTER FUND 8,661.78 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 2,311.05 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 3,112.55 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 42,263.62 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 1,891.20 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 5,024.47 05800 LIQUOR FUND 139,329.98 05900 UTILITY FUND 43,965.07 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 188.08 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 290.88 Report Totals 448,138.04 We confirm to the best of our knowiedqq and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing pplicies and .��51 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/31 /2005 8:12:35 Council Check Register Page - 1 8/26/2005 - 9/1/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 275871 8126/2005 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 265.00 PERMIT FEE - SCHAEFER CIR 119066_ 082305 05443.1705.12 CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION WM SCHAEFER CIRCLE 265.00 275872 9/112005 100611 A TO Z RENTAL CENTER 2,033.17 TENT RENTAL 119045 1203714 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION_ 2,033.17 275873 9/1/2005 102403 AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT 106.07 SOD 118914 22910 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 106.07 275874 911/2005 100715 ACCLAIM BENEFITS 426.40 JUNE 2005 FEE 119264 351154 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 426.40 JULY 2005 FEE 119265 352025 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 852.80 275875 91112005 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 26.28 119097 467570 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 47.96 119098 466039 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 22.12 119099 467571 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 82.12 119100 466040 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 23.56 119101 467620 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 65.46 119102 467511 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 77.24 119103 466043 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 71.24 119104 466304 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 415.98 275876 9/1/2005 102626 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES 846.36 READY MIX 118915 4123622 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 846.36 READY MIX 118916 4123851 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 1,316.56 READY MIX 118917 4123620 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 615.36 READY MIX 119200 4124198 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 329.14 READY MIX 119201 4123621 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 3,953.78 275877 911/2005 102715 ALLEGRA PRINT & IMAGING 95.85 SEPT /OCT CALENDARS 119309 57524 5610.6575 PRINTING ED ADMINISTRATION 95.85 275878 9/1/2005 100630 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC. 1,078.66 COPIER PAPER 119202 10018813 -00 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/31/2005 8:12:35 Council Check Register Page - 2 8/26/2005 — 9/1/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,078.66 275879 91112005 101874 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC. 1,267.09. MICROPHONES, ANTENNAS 119310 41456 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,267.09 275880 9/1/2005 117824 ANDREW CORPORATION 44,923.00 MIKOM INSTALLATION SERVICES 118988 700072823 44003.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 800 MHZ RADIO 77.75 MISCELLANEOUS SERVICES 118989 700081774 44003.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 800 MHZ RADIO 45,000.75 275881 9/1/2005 102470 AON RISK SERVICES INC. OF MN 603.00- CREDIT ON ACCT 119266 6100000063747 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 19,415.00 JULY PREMIUM 119267 610000073587 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 6,369.00 AUG PREMIUM 119268 610000073588 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 6,369.00 SEPT PREMIUM 119269 610000074784 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 31,550.00 275882 91112005 102172 APPERT'S'FOODSERVICE 735.31 FOOD 119046 434391 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 735.31 275883 9/112005 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING - 137.51 IRRIGATION CLAMPS 119203 8484 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 137.51 275884 9/1/2005 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. 90.57 POOL CHEMICALS 119311 27403 5620.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH PARK 53.52 HYDROCHLORIC ACID 119312 27413 5620.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH PARK 144.09 275885 9/1/2005 118061 ARAMARK UNIFORM 286.22 UNIFORM PURCHASE 118918 57858173 -1 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 128.25 UNIFORM PURCHASE 118919 57858174 -1 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 414.47 275886 9/1/2005 101954 AUGIE'S INC. 63.00 FOOD 119270 24734 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 63.00 275887 911/2005 104069 B.B. WATSON GRAPHIC DESIGN 'x1.70 BUSINESS CARDS 118990 426 1419.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RESERVE PROGRAM . R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/3112005 8:12:35 Council Check Register Page - 3 8/26/2005 - 9/1/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 191.70 275888 9/1/2005 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 271.30 119105 34358100 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,373.00 119106 34208900 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,539.00 119107 34313100 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 36.05 119108 40407800 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 67.76 119109 40396100 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 9.79 119372 40439800 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 886.65 119373 34372000 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 132.82 119374 40440000 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,138.00 119375 34318700 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,009.00 119376 34312600 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 175.21 119377 40364300 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,490.35 119378 34321400 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 14,128.93 275889 911/2005 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 61.55 PENS, SCISSORS, MAKRERS 118920 OE- 2645 -1 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 625.36 OFFICE SUPPLIES 118991 WO- 373731 -1 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 80.91 INK CARTRIDGES 118992 OE- 2172 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 12.77 OFFICE SUPPLIES 118993 OE- 3193 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 11.10 MOUSE PADS, STICKERS 119047 OE- 3701 -1 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 225.29 OFFICE SUPPLIES 119271 OE- 2086 -1 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 285.82 OFFICE SUPPLIES 119313 OE -4098 -1 1470.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,302.80 275890 9N/2005 118664 BINOCULARS.COM 84.13 BINOCULARS 118994 201358 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 84.13 275891 9H/2005 100711 BLOOD, DAVID 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 119038 090105 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 275892 9/1/2005 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 804.64 TANK ASSEMBLY, INSULATORS 118921 779160 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 761.50- CREDIT 118922 760423 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,423.56 SPRINGS, BOLTS, NUTS 119204 779986 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 11.58 AIR VALVE 119205 781057 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,478.28 CITY OF EDINA 8/31/2005 8:12:35 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 4 8/26/2005 - 9/1/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 275893 9/1/2005 100663 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 27.68 PETTY CASH 119048 081905 5420.6250 ALARM SERVICE CLUB HOUSE 37.00 PETTY CASH 119048 081905 5410.6235 POSTAGE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 49.22 . PETTY CASH 119048 081905 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES. MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 55.36 PETTY CASH 119048 081905 5440.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 65.00 PETTY CASH 119048 081905 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 69.17 PETTY CASH 119048 081905 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 303.43 275894 9/112005 102398 BUDGET PROJECTOR REPAIR 85.00 REPAIRS 118923 2712 5125.6180 _ CONTRACTED REPAIRS MEDIA STUDIO . 65.00 REPAIRS 118924 2713 5125.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MEDIA STUDIO 150.00 275895 9/1/2005 100776 BUTLER, GEORGE 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 119037 090105 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 275896 9/1/2005 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 123.04 GOLF CLUB 118925 907008170 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES _ 123.04 275897 9/1/2005 118678 CAMPION, KENN - 110.00 PROGRAM REFUND 119306 082905 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 110.00 275898 9/112005 103110 CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY CO. 172.59 RR FLAGGING 118926 10940473 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 172.59 275899 9/1/2005 112811 CASTREJON INC. 1,160.00 BORE 5601 OAKLAWN 118927 18497 1322.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 1,160.00 275900 9/1/2005 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 720.00 119110 41773 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 720.00 275901 91112005 100681 CATCO 21.70 FITTINGS 118928 3 -83142 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 326.83 PIGGYBACK PLUS 118929 15 -06477 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 19.25 FITTINGS, CONNECTORS 118930 7 -17573 '--A.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/26/2005 - 9/1/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 2.30 FITTINGS 118931 1 -60193 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 50.82 FITTINGS 118932 3 -82049 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 163.41 PIGGYBACK PLUS 118933 15 -06414 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 584.43 MUFFLER, TUBING, ELBOWS 118934 1 -61686 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 51.28- CREDIT 118935 3 -82802 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 468.80 PURGE VALVE KIT, CARTRIDGE 119049 3 -82796 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 116.87 PIGGY BACKS 119050 3 -82801 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 163.41- CREDIT 119051 3 -83079 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 74.71 FITTINGS, CAPS 119206 3 -82975 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,644.43 MERCHANDISE 118938 320415 275902 9/112005 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 275906 9/112005 251.32 TONER 119207 TG21152 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 342.92 TONER 119208 TL64309 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 564.07 DRUM KITS, TONER 119209 SW19881 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/31/2005 8:12:35 Page - 5 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN -MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1551.6186 HEAT 1,158.31 7413.6186 HEAT PSTF FIRE TOWER 275903 9/1/2005 PSTF FIRE TOWER 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 6.19 -118936 081805 1.08 118937 081505 2.20 119314 081905 9.47 275904 9/112005 100256 CINGULAR WIRELESS 24.93 119052 081705 24.93 275905 9/1/2005 102123 CIT GROUP /COMMERCIAL SERVICES, 982.98 MERCHANDISE 118938 320415 982.98 275906 9/112005 100688 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERVICES INC 14.38 WINDOW CLEANING 119315 360665 16.62 WINDOW CLEANING 119315 360665 27.04 WINDOW CLEANING 119315 360665 58.04 275907 911/2005 100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP. 514.50 PIKE POLES 119316 46845 514.50 275908 9/112005 100693 COMMERCIAL FURNITURE 8/31/2005 8:12:35 Page - 5 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN -MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1551.6186 HEAT CITY HALL GENERAL 7413.6186 HEAT PSTF FIRE TOWER 7413.6582 FUEL OIL PSTF FIRE TOWER 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 5440.5511 5861.6180 5821.6180 5841.6180 1470.6406 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CITY OF EDINA 8/31/2005 8:12:35 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 6 8126/2005 - 9/1/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 181.05 FILE CABINET 119317 00096777 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 181.05 275909 9/1/2005 101395 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION 756.69 MATERIAL TESTING 118939 PA000112721 01205.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION WOODDALE - 56 TO W RECLAIM 326.90 MATERIAL TESTING 118940 PA000111671 01205.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION WOODDALE - 56 TO W RECLAIM 1,083.59 275910 91112005 101323 CON NEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 96.09 GLOVES, LOTION 118941 02640687 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 25.77 SAFETY GLASSES 119053 02642761 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 81.65 GLOVES, TARPS, LOPPER 119053 02642761 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 203.51 275911 911/2005 101763 CONSOLIDATED PLASTICS CO. INC. 120.14 VINYL ENVELOPES 118995 6282274 1640.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 120.14 275912 9/112005 101329 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC. 20.87 BROOM BRACKET 118996 M075902 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 20.87 275913 9/1/2005 118666 COOKE, CARLENE 100.08 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 119054 082405 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 100.08 275914 9/1/2005 100701 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. 309.39 REBUILT ALTERNATOR 119272 132170 5630.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES 309.39 275915 9/112005 117387 DATARADIO COR LTD 229.07 RADIO REPAIR 118942 131904 5914.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 229.07 275916 9/1/2005 103182 DAVIS & STANTON 162.00 COMMENDATION BARS 119318 09587 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 237.00 UNIFORM BARS 119319 09765 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 399.00 275917 9/1/2005 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING 2,945.50 119111 327724 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING -7.00 119112 327236 c "- 5513 . COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8131/2005 8:12:35 Council Check Register Page - 7 8/26/2005 -- 9/1/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 440.00 119379 327235 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 52.40 119380- 327722 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,284.22 119381 327721 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 961.80 119382 327723 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 6,940.92 275918 9/1/2005 101534 DELI DOUBLE 6,625.95 FOOD 119055 72126 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 6,625.95 275919 9/1/2005 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 33.23 BAKERY 118943 198427 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 82.06 BAKERY 119056 198604 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 61.24 BAKERY 119057 198640 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 57.51 BAKERY 119273 198720 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 63.01 BAKERY 119274 198751 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 297.05 275920 9/1/2005 102712 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION 327.48 119275 W05070571 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 327.48 275921 9/1/2005 104460 DNR SIGN SHOP 639.00 PARK ID SIGNS 119210 0002643 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 639.00 275922 9/1/2005 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 8,176.23 LEGAL 119251 1256769 1195.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES 8,176.23 275923 911/2005 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES 2,803.13 CHEMICALS 119058 82701133 -05 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 2,051.17 CHEMICALS 119059 82701107 -05 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 4,854.30 275924 9/1/2005 100739 EAGLE WINE 806.31 119113 280322 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 34.10 119114 280325 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING .85 119115 280169 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING .85 119116 280170 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,462.10 119117 277224 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 437.62 119118 280324 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 100297 FAST FOTO & DIGITAL .199.69 CITY OF EDINA 199.69 119001 275931 9/1/2005 100756 FEDERAL EXPRESS 11.00 SHIPPING. CHARGES Council Check Register 744624 275932 9/1/2005 100759 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY 208.45 LOCK REPAIR 490.43 8/26/2005 — 9/1/2005 BUILDINGS Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No. Subledger Account Description 902.95 119383 280323 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 4,644.78 275925 9/112005 100741 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 180.00 119060 14820 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 2,689.75 119119 327236 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 15.40 119384 327243 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5,799.15 119385 327244 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 3,866.05 119386 327237 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 12,550.35 275926 9/1/2005 106340 EDINA CAR WASH 191.70 JULY CAR WASHES 118997 2219 1553.6238 CAR WASH 191.70 275927 9/1/2005 106194 EMA INC. 1,820.00 LIFT STATION SCADA 119320 5604 - 90008476 10027.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 1,820.00 275928 9/1/2005 105339 ENRGI 12.50 WEBSITE CONSULTING 118998 3200 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT 813.75 WEBSITE CONSULTING 118999 3214 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT 750.00 WEBSITE CONSULTING 119000 3212 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT, _ 1,576.25 275929 9/1/2005 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 32.00 119120 334698 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 275930 9/1/2005 100297 FAST FOTO & DIGITAL .199.69 EMPLOYEE RECOG PHOTOS 199.69 119001 275931 9/1/2005 100756 FEDERAL EXPRESS 11.00 SHIPPING. CHARGES 11.00 744624 275932 9/1/2005 100759 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY 208.45 LOCK REPAIR 490.43 LOCK SERVICE 698.88 BUILDINGS 8/31/2005 8:12:35 Page - . 8 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING GRILL 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN LS -27 LIFT STATION 15 COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS VERNON SELLING 119276 T2- 209066 1513.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS 119001 5- 536 -52572 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 119061 744624 5410.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION 119211 744646 5912.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS BUILDINGS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/31/2005 8:12:35 Council Check Register Page - 9 8/26/2005 - 9/1/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subiedger Account Description Business Unit 275933 9/1/2005 101475 FOOTJOY 69.77 SHOES 119277 3561279 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 175.91 SHOES 119278 3555910 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PR_ O SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 245.68 275934 911/2005 104071 FREUND, JEFF 37.00 PETTY CASH 119321 082505 5610.6235 POSTAGE ED ADMINISTRATION 156.24 PETTY CASH 119321 082505 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 193.24 275935 9/1/2005 102456 GALLS INC. 139.83 T -SHIRTS 119002 5783459900011 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 60.87 CAR OPENING SETS 119003 5782926300011 1400.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 133.62- CREDIT 119004 577268360101 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 35.12 FLARE CONTAINERS 119322 5785694100026 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 102.20 275936 9/112005 105508 GEMPLER'S INC. 182.15 UNIFORM PURCHASE 119005 1006719083 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 80.80 SAFETY GLASSES 119006 1006700975 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 64.35 PRUNING SHEARS 119323 1006466893 5620.6556 TOOLS EDINBOROUGH PARK 327.30 275937 911/2005 100775 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION 805.00 SOFTBALL SHIRTS 119324 70668 4077.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA- ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 805.00 275938 9/1/2005 118677 GERMAIN, MICHELLE 17.00 PROGRAM REFUND 119307 082605 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 17.00. 275939 91112005 102385 GOLF MINNESOTA 140.00 MAGAZINES 119062 0516 5210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 140.00 275940 9/112005 100779 GOPHER CASH REGISTER 104.53 REGISTER REPAIR 119063 19048 5424.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS RANGE 104.53 275941 911/2005 102645 GRAFFITI CONTROL SERVICES 308.00 GRAFFITI REMOVAL 119212 00001312 1646.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 308.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/31/2005 8:12:35 Council Check Register Page - 10 8/26/2005 -- 9/1/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No. Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 275942 9/112005 103855 GRAHN, LEON 136.08 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 118945 081905 5410.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 136.08 275943 911/2005 101103 GRAINGER 135.92 WASP SPRAY, BATTERIES 118944 495 - 628188 -7 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 9.85 WASP SPRAY 119064 495 -477857 -9 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING. 45.00 LEVEL 119064 495 -477857 -9 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 97.68 MEASURING TAPES 119064 495- 477857 -9 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 143.73 TOOLBOX 119213 495- 716927 -1 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 63.64 BULBS 119279 498 - 628186 -5 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 201.06 TRACK FAN 119325 495- 482033 -0 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 6.48 POWER CORD 119326 498 - 684213 -8 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 95.83 ELECTRICAL PARTS 119327 001 - 082192 -4 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 590.97 AIR CONDITIONER 119328 498 - 957073 -6 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,390.16 275944 911/2005 102670 GRAND PERE WINES INC 271.00 119121 00013746 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,391.45 119122 00013784. 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,662.45 275945 9/1/2005 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 1,557.25 119123. 75040 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,470.75 119124 74943 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 182.50 119125 74909 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 279.75 119126 75039 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 341.00 119387 74989 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,831.25 275946 9/112005 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 57.54 TOOLS 119065 911358017 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 57.54 275947 9/112005 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 150.81 119127 280453 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,171.73 119128 280454 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 88.25 119129 280457 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 231.20 119130 264179 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 27.05 119131 277139 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING '9,08 119132 280449 " ' 5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR, 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/31/2005 8:12:35 Council Check Register Page - 11 8/26/2005 — 9/1/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 44.05 119133 280448 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 3,672.17 275948 9/1/2005. 118673 HALBROOKS, JILL 181.90 SPRINKLER REPAIR 119214 082305 01204.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BROOKVIEW - 52 TO 54 RECLAIM 181.90 275949 9/1/2005 100791 HALLMAN OIL COMPANY 727.20 5W30 BULK OIL 119215 160300 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 958.76 15W40 BULK OIL .119216 160301 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,685.96 275950 9/112005 100795 HARRIS HOMEYER CO. 118,916.00 PREMIUM 119280 62588 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,835.00 PREMIUM 119281 62902 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 120,751.00 275951 9/112005 101209. HEIMARK FOODS 205.44 MEAT PATTIES 119282 018567 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL ' 205.44 - 275952 911/2005 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION 1,706.42 RADIO LEASE 119329 25058012 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,706.42 275953 9/112005 101717 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 185.00 HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL 119330 041188 7411.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL PSTF OCCUPANCY 185.00 275954 91112005 106371 HENNEPIN FACULTY ASSOCIATES 2,265.17 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES 119044 090105 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,265.17 275955 9/112005 116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY 990.45 . PC 119217 38401372 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 990.45 275956 9/112005 105512 HILL, MARK 19.00 UPGRADE DRIVERS LICENSE 119067 082405 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 19.00 275957 9/112005 100805 HIRSHFIELD'S CITY OF EDINA 8/31/2005 8:12:35 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 12 8/26/2005 --9/1/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No _ Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 75.56 PAINT 119218 026199804 1375.6530 REPAIR PARTS PARKING RAMP 75.56 275958 91112005 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 308.00 119134 367508 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 574.60 119135 367507 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 423.50 119388 367509 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,306.10 275959 9/112005 102114 HUEBSCH 149.07 ROLL TOWELS, MATS 119331 290277 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 149.07 275960 9/1/2005 100811 HYDRO METERING TECHNOLOGY 571.91 WATER METER, FLANGE 118946 0030478 -IN 5914.5516 COST OF GOODS SOLD METERS TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 571.91 275961 911/2005 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 39.47 PVC PIPE, COUPLINGS 119007 401760 1642.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIELD MAINTENANCE 46.95 COUPLINGS 119008 402316 1642.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIELD MAINTENANCE 86.42 275962 9/1/2005 102640 IPMA 299.00 DUES 119283 082505 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 299.00 275963 911/2005 101861 J.H. LARSON COMPANY 24.75 PIPE CONDUIT 119009 4493862 -02 1648.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 31.15 ADAPTERS, COUPLINGS 119010 4493862 -01 1648.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 55.90 275964 91112005 100202 JAMAR TECHNOLOGIES INC. 173.07 TRAFFIC TUBES & TAPES 119219 70319 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 173.07 275965 91112005 101400 JAMES, WILLIAM F 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 119042 090105 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 275966 91112005 103067 JENSON, THOMAS _'266.24 TRAINING COMPUTER MONITOR 119332 082505 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL '.24 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/31/2005 8:12:35 Council Check Register Page - 13 8/26/2005 - 9/1/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 275967 911/2005 102136 JERRY'S TRANSMISSION SERVICE 113.84 HALOGEN BULBS 119068 0005357 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 113.84 275969 91112005 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. .95 119136 1945220 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,769.85 119137 1945229 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 215.70 119138 1945232 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 30.94 119139 1945225 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 488.40 119140 1945226 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 372.40 119141 1945228 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 623.41 119142 1945219 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,131.18 119143 1945222 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 534.60 119144 1945221 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 6,656.70 119145 1945223 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 60.27- 119146 288028 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 607.70 119389 1948647 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 398.89 119390 1948651 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 364.30 119391 1948650 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 302.95 119392 1948649 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,024.44 119393 1948648 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 98.95 119394 1948646 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,819.15 119395 1948657 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 145.40 119396 1948658 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 256.45 119397 1948659 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,587.05 119398 1948655 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 973.08 119399 1948656 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,220.43 119400 1947932 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE . YORK SELLING 401.75 119401 1948654 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 26,964.40 275970 9/1/2005 103230 JOHNSTONS SALES & SERVICE 55.91 VACUUM BAGS 119220 634150 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 55.84 VACUUM REPAIR 119284 634149 5420.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CLUB HOUSE 111.75 275971 9/1/2005 106186 KAEDING & ASSOCIATES INC. 3,800.00 LIGHTING DESIGN 119436 500857C 08044.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN L-44 SUNNYSLOPE AREA IMPROVE. 3,800.00 275972 9/1/2005 108857 KEN GORG GOLF SHOP 119402 4452 0 119403 445266 275977 9/1/2005 100378 LAKE MANAGEMENT INC. CITY OF EDINA 8/31/2005 8:12:35 R55CKREG LOG20000 POND TREATMENTS 119011 24414 18,912.00 275978 911/2005 Council Check Register Page - 14 469.00 SERVICE 4808 WOODHILL WAY 118950 5182 8/26/2005 — 9/112005 88.00 SERVICE 4808 E SUNNYSLOPE Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 9/1/2005 936.00 GOLF CLUBS 119285 031849 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 04190271 936.00 93.35 275980 91112005 275973 9/1/2005 114558 KESTREL DESIGN GROUP INC., THE 3,500.00 ASSISTED HOUSING CONSULTING 118952 12591 146.25 MEADOW RD LIFT STATION 118948 2400 5923.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER COLLECTION SYSTEMS 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 533.61 CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION 118949 2407 01101.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 54TH BLVD BEAUTIFICATION 3541259 679.86 -'+.63 CONNECTORS, ANTIFREEZE 119071 3541260 275974 9/1/2005 118672 KLEIN, DEBBIE 100.00 CANCELLATION REFUND 119221 082305 5401.4553 CLUBHOUSE GOLF REVENUES 100.00 275975 9/1/2005 118667 KONTOZI, DOROTHY 613.82 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 119069 082405 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 613.82 275976 9/1/2005 100846 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO 853.50 119147 444843 5842.5514 822 5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 119402 4452 0 119403 445266 275977 9/1/2005 100378 LAKE MANAGEMENT INC. 18,912.00 POND TREATMENTS 119011 24414 18,912.00 275978 911/2005 118660 LAKES AREA HOME IMPROVEMENT SE 469.00 SERVICE 4808 WOODHILL WAY 118950 5182 88.00 SERVICE 4808 E SUNNYSLOPE 118951 5193 557.00 275979 9/1/2005 100605 LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS 93.35 SHIRTS 119012 04190271 93.35 275980 91112005 118661 LASALLE GROUP 3,500.00 ASSISTED HOUSING CONSULTING 118952 12591 3,500.00 275981 9/1/2005 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 249.18 FITTINGS, SEALANT, WASHERS 119070 3541259 -'+.63 CONNECTORS, ANTIFREEZE 119071 3541260 5 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5933.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PONDS & LAKES 05441.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM SUNNYSLOPE WOODHILL 05441.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM SUNNYSLOPE WOODHILL 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5°'" 91406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA SPREADER, SPRAYER 115204 12442240 Council Check Register GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 8/26/2005 - 9/112005 23.00 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 342.81 DISTRIBUTION - 275982 9/1/2005 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 119223 12868264 2,175.00 PREMIUM 119286 6537 1550.6200 INSURANCE 88,807.50 PREMIUM 119287 6577 1550.6200 INSURANCE 90,982.50 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT DISTRIBUTION 275983 91112005 100855 LESCO INC. 2.40- CREDIT ON ACCT 8/31/2005 8:12:35 Page- 15 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 53.52 SPREADER, SPRAYER 115204 12442240 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 23.00 SEED STARTER MULCH 119222 12808511 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT DISTRIBUTION - 56.55 SEED, MULCH 119223 12868264 5913.6543 _ SOD & BLACK DIRT DISTRIBUTION .54- CREDIT ON ACCT 119224 0274015CM -00753 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT DISTRIBUTION 2.40- CREDIT ON ACCT 119225 0274245CM -00929 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT DISTRIBUTION 130.13 275984 9/112005 117720 LIFE, FITNESS 60.19 WEIGHT PIN 119333 F081900427 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 60.19 275985 9/1/2005 110888 LOPEZ, ELIZABETH 102.72 WORKSHOP EXPENSE 119226 082205 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING 102.72 275986 9/1/2005 100861 LYNDALE GARDEN CENTER 115.99 SOIL ADDITIVES 119072 856393 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT DISTRIBUTION 115.99 275987 9/112005 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 85.32 CANDY 119227 185767 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 369.72 CANDY 119228 185913 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 455.04 275988 9/1/2005 100864 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. 1,201.32 SIDEBROOM SETS 119073 2055295 1310.6523 BROOMS STREET CLEANING 645.67 SIDE BROOM MOTOR 119229 2055515 1310.6523 BROOMS STREET CLEANING 1,846.99 275989 9/1/2005 118668 MADSEN, MARGIE 629.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 119074 082405 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 629.00 275990 9/112005 102981 MARATHON ASHLAND PETROLEUM LLC CITY OF EDINA 8/3112005 8:12:35 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 16 8/26/2005 -- 9/1/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger, Account Description Business Unit 73.40 SHORT LOAD FEE 118953 097684 1314.6519 ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION 73.40 275991 91112005 100868 MARK VII SALES 18.40 119148 836145 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,138.75 119149 836144 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,387.20 119404 835901 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 143.50 119405 836625 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,218.85 119406 836624 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 106.00 119407 838588 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,781.98 119408 838587 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 7,794.68 275992 9/1/2005 116756 MARKETING BY VIDEO 500.00 VIDEO AD 119230 11459 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 500.00 275993 9/1/2005 100875 MCCAREN DESIGNS INC. 741.24 PLANTS 119334 31772 5620.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH PARK 741.24 275994 9/1/2005 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS. 1,368.50 SEPT 1 MUSEUM TRIP 119288 082305 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 1,368.50 275995 9/1/2005 100953 MEDTRONIC PHYSIO CONTROL CORP. 305.20 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 119335 PC705990 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 305.20 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 119336 PC705985 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 610.40 275996 9/1/2005 101483 MENARDS 159.66 CONCRETE MIX, LATCH 119013 51092 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 19.08 VALVES 119014 53221 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 97.97 CLOSET POLES, SHELVES 119075 53202 1551.6530 REPAIR PARTS CITY HALL GENERAL 27.14 PREMIX CONCRETE 119231 54480 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 303.85 275997 9/1/2005 101987 MENARDS 49.05 BLADES, SCREWS 119337 16125 .5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 79.70 DOOR STOPS, DOWELS 119338 19466 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 8.31 MASONRY BITS 119339 19790 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK ' ?.59 DOWELS, DEAD BOLT 119340 19867 ` " -' 433406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK Y R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8126/2005 - 9/1/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 159.65 9/1/2005 104650 MICRO CENTER 275998 911/2005 100882 MERIT SUPPLY 31.93 USB CABLES 119232 939071 400.81 MOPHEADS, CLEANERS 119015 67526 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 401.71 CLEANING SUPPLIES 119341 67500 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 802.52 375.25 119150 80309110 275999 9/1/2005 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 485.70 119151 80600236 91.48 FIELD MARKING PAINT 119016 85375 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER 1470.6406 5842.5515 5862.5515 1600.6107 1629.6406 8/31/2005 8:12:35 Page - 17 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE. EDINBOROUGH PARK FIELD MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 5923.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1628.6103 42.60 GALVANIZED PIPE 119017 0065822 -IN 1642.6530 42.60 276007 91112005 117683 MORRIS, PAUL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL ADAPTIVE RECREATION COLLECTION SYSTEMS DISTRIBUTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS REPAIR PARTS FIELD MAINTENANCE 91.48 276000 9/1/2005 104650 MICRO CENTER 31.93 USB CABLES 119232 939071 31.93 276001 9/1/2005 100692 MIDWEST COCA -COLA EAGAN 375.25 119150 80309110 485.70 119151 80600236 860.95 276002 9/1/2005 102873 MILLER, SUSAN 10.00 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 119308 082905 180.93 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 119308 082905 190.93 276003 9/1/2005 113638 MINNESOTA NATIVE LANDSCAPES IN 225.00 MEADOW RD LIFT STATION 118955 1914 225.00 276004 9/112005 101376 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT 85.92 PROBE ROD 118956 0173353 85.92 276005 9/1/2005 103240 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL 434.00 DEFENSIVE DRIVING CLASS 119289 016632 434.00 276006 9/112005 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER 1470.6406 5842.5515 5862.5515 1600.6107 1629.6406 8/31/2005 8:12:35 Page - 17 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE. EDINBOROUGH PARK FIELD MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 5923.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1628.6103 42.60 GALVANIZED PIPE 119017 0065822 -IN 1642.6530 42.60 276007 91112005 117683 MORRIS, PAUL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL ADAPTIVE RECREATION COLLECTION SYSTEMS DISTRIBUTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS REPAIR PARTS FIELD MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/31/2005 8:12:35 Council Check Register Page - 18 8/26/2005 - 9/1/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 150.00 PERFORMANCE 8/22/05 119076 082405 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 276008 9/112005 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 39.50 COUPLINGS 119018 490150 -00 1642.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIELD MAINTENANCE 43.06 IRRIGATION PARTS 119290 492681 -00 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 732.00 SERVICE CONTRACT FOR MOWERS 119291 472118 -00 5630.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES 60.84 TINES 119292 476852 -00 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 9.56- RETURN 119293 362469 -00 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 865.84 276009 9/1/2005 105323 MTM RECOGNITION 110.96 EMPLOYEE RECOG PINS 119294 5105752 1513.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS 110.96 276010 9/1/2005 114345 NAIOP 75.00 2005 INDUSTRIAL REPORTS 119233 082505 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 75.00 276011 911/2005 114345 NAIOP 85.00 2005 OFFICE MKT UPDATE 119342 26016 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING 85.00 276012 9/1/2005 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 162.00 119152 32894 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,199.00 119153 32893 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 616.00 119154 " 32895 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,977.00 276013 9/1/2005 100724 NISSEN, DICK 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 119041 090105 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 276014 9/1/2005 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY 40.20 PRIMED DUCK ROLL 118957 31777500 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 40.20 j 276015 9/1/2005 100930 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO. 59.85 TIRES 119077 NW -97235 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 59.85 276016 91112005 118114 OCE 1 CITY OF EDINA 8/31/2005 8:12:35 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 19 8/26/2005 — 911/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 147.00 OCE MAINTENANCE 118958 985025410 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 147.00 276017 9/112005 105901 OERTEL ARCHITECTS 1,652.00 XCEL SITE ANALYSIS FOR PW 118959 #1 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,652.00 276018 9/112005 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 48.95 REGISTER RIBBON 119078 302239718 -001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 136.62 TONER 119079 302790044 - 001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 185.57 276019 911/2005 105612 OFFICE TEAM 820.00 SARA ST. JAMES - TEMP 119019 13923489 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 820.00 276020 91112005 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 42.04 CARBIDE SET 119020 353056 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 42.04 276021 911/2005 118670 OLSON, JOEL 150.00 PERFORMANCE 8128/05 119080 082405 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 276022 911/2005 118669 OLSON, KENNETH 617.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 119081 082405 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 617.00 276023 9/1/2005 118089 OPPORTUNITY PARTNERS 2,060.00 JUNE SERVICE 119295 102812 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 2,060.00 276024 911/2005 100939 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC. 94.64 COOKIES 119234 19410053 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 47.32 COOKIES 119235 18467453 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 141.96 276025 9/1/2005 100941 PARK NICOLLET CLINIC 207.00 DRUG TESTING 119236 081705 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 207.00 276026 911/2005 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8131/2005 8:12:35 Council Check Register Page - 20 8/26/2005 - 9/1/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,109.50 119755 8079090 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,432.28 119156 8079681 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 82.00 119157 8079683 -IN 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING. 3,507.24 119158 8079677 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 143.50 119409 8079679 -IN 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 109.00 119410, 8079680 -IN 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,004.79 119411 8079682 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 52.00 119412 8079820 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 10,440.31 276027 9/1/2005 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 874.50 118960 76348628 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 243.40 119296 04271636 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 353.00 119343 05289408 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES 1,470.90 276028 9/1/2005 100948 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRACT_ ORS 1,200.00 SOCCER FIELD REPAIRS 119021 PO 5598 1642.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIELD MAINTENANCE 1,200.00 - 276029 911/2005 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 293.70 119159 2231182 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,148.65 119160 2231189 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,386.80 119161 2231186 5862.5513 - COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 94.40 119162 2231187 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 7,438.54 119163 2231183 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 149.90- 119164 3322816 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 9.65- 119165 3322774 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 13.79- 119166 3322773 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 42.95- 119167 3323268 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 25.35- 119168 3323267 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 47.20 119413 2233646 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 2,920.83 119414 2233645 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 77.48 119415 2233647 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 876.55 119416 2233648 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 565.70 119417 2233649 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,417.50 119418 2233650 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING . 421.10 119419 2233651 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,022.70 119420 2233652 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 20,469.51 276030 9H/2005 101032 PRINT SHOP, THE R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 276031 9/1/2005 Amount Supplier / Explanation 647.56 NEWSLETTER 647.56 3,279.72 2,930.53 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC 102.00 BLADE SHARPENING 102.00 VERNON SELLING CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/26/2005 - 9/1/2005 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 119297 102037 1628.6575 Subledger Account Description PRINTING 8/31/2005 8:12:35 Page - . 21 Business Unit SENIOR CITIZENS 118961 213332 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 276032 911/2005 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 100969 PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING ENGINEE 3,279.72 2,930.53 119169 280443 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 132.70 119170 280444 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 267.85 119170 280444 5862.5513 _ COST OF -GOODS SOLD WINE- VERNON SELLING 1,420.21 119171 280452 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6.89- 119172 672896 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,176.26 119421 280447 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING - 5,920.66 276035 9/112005 276033 91112005 100969 PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING ENGINEE 3,279.72 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYSTEM 118962 03034.22 05426.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 508.91 WELL #2 DESIGN 118963 05023.02 05450.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 3,788.63 276034 9/1/2005 100970 QUALITY REFRIGERATION INC 285.00 SERVICE PLAN 119082 23956 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 784.61 ICE MAKER REPAIRS 119298 23812 5421.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,069.61 276035 9/112005 100971 QUALITY WINE 14.40- 119173 593525 -00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 1,471.08 119173 593525 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 22.03- 119174 594914 -00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 2,233.41 119174 594914 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 13.23- 119175 595023 -00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 1,344.72 119175 595023 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 19.40 119176 573909 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 2.06- 119177 595024 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 210.65 119177 595024 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 17.56- 119178 594916 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 1,776.36 119178 594916 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 15.08- 119179 593526 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 1,539.08 119179 593526 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 17.34- 119180 594918-00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 1,752.41 119180 594918 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE PLANT #4 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYST WM-450 GRILL GRILL LIQUOR YORK GENERAL YORK SELLING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL YORK SELLING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL VERNON SELLING VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL VERNON SELLING VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL VERNON SELLING 50TH STREET GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING CITY OF EDINA 8/31/2005 8:12:35 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 22 8/2612005 --9/112005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 8.68- 119181 594919 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 438.13 119181- 594919 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 18.50- 119182 589170 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 14.66- 119183 589100 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 56.97- 119184 588169 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 11.36- 119422 594917 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 571.09 119422 594917 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 36.09- 119423 594915 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 1,820.00 119423 594915 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 9.91- 119424 594164 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 1,004.12 119424 594164 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 44.85- 119425 594962 -00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 2,258.34 119425 594962 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 16,136.07 276036 911/2005 101965 QWEST 112.11 952 920 -8166 119237 8166 -8105 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 112.11 276037 9/1/2005 100972 R&R SPECIALTIES INC 1,088.60 REPAIR SURFACER 118964 23875 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 1,088.60 276038 911/2005 104643 RECREATION SUPPLY COMPANY 1,088.59 POOL VAC 119344 114538 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,088.59 276039 9/1/2005 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 269.27 SOFTENER SALT 118965 00166574 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 269.27 276040. 911/2005 116393 ROGERS, RUSS 150.00 PERFORMANCE 911/05 119083 '082405 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 276041 91112005 102040 RYGG, JAMES 87.96 UNIFORM PURCHASE 119022 082305 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 87.96 276042 9/112005 101634 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPANY 41.98 BAKERY 118966 132348 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 18 s R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/26/2005 - 9/1/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 276043 9/112005 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 364.62 LUMBER 118967 40142037 5630.6532 PAINT 64.54 CEMENT FORMS 119023 40150377 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 19.55 TAPE, PAINT, SANDPAPER 119345 40136026 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 418.08 DOORS 119346 40143745 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 318.35 DOORS, PAINTING SUPPLIES 119347 40131125 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 78.92 DOOR 119348 40141284 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 78.92- RETURN 119349 3015100 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,185.14 276044 9/112005 102949 SECURITAS SECURITY SYSTEMS USA 575.10 ALARM MONITORING 119350 D3150181 5620.6250 ALARM SERVICE 170.00 ALARM REPAIR 119351 2069463 -IN 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 745.10 276045 911/2005 100995 SEH 1,017.87 CITYWORKS IMPROVEMENT 118968 0134087 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,017.87 276046 9/1/2005 103249 SHANNON, JIM 660.00 STROLLING PIANO - AUG 119084 082405 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 660.00 276047 911/2005 102841 SHUTTERS'N SHADES 430.00 SHUTTER REPAIR 119299 SNS25073 5424.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 430.00 276048 9/1/2005 101383 SIITARI, MICHAEL 500.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 119024 082305 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 500.00 276049 9/112005 118034 SLB OF MINNESOTA LLC 134.57 MEETING LUNCHES 118969 081705STMT 1504.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS 352.47 MEETING LUNCHES 118969 081705STMT 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE 487.04 276050 9/1/2005 100439 SONMORE, STEVE 8/31/2005 8:12:35 Page- 23 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES BUILDING MAINTENANCE EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK _ EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK DISTRIBUTION ED ADMINISTRATION RANGE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL 150 00 PERFORMANCE 9/6105 119085 082405 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 276051 9/112005 101002 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS INC R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/31/2005 8:12:35 Council Check Register Page - 24 8/26/2005 - 9/1/2005 B 'n Unit Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description usi ess 171.00 119086 169511 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 73.80 119087 351434 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 41.55 119185 169654 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5,694.10 119186 169653 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 765.90 119187 169651 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 6,746.35 276052 91112005 116682 SPECIALTY WINES & BEVERAGES 122.00 119188 4049 122.00 9/1/2005 276053 9/1/2005 102424 SPEEDY PRINT 990.45 GOLF SCORECARDS 118970 55184 990.45 276054 9/1/2005 101004 SPS COMPANIES 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5410.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION 107.70 ACTUATOR CARTRIDGES 119025 S1288888.001 1646.6530 220.50 NIPPLES, PIPE WRENCHES 119088 S1292848.001 5923.6406 5.33 WAX RING 119352 S1285116.001 5620.6406 07091.1705.20 06038.1705.20 1550.6200 1553.6530 1646.6406 5400.2072 REPAIR PARTS - GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN INSURANCE REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES MEN'S CLUB BUILDING MAINTENANCE COLLECTION SYSTEMS EDINBOROUGH PARK SIDEWALK INTERLACHEN /BLAKE TS -38 W 77 & COMPUTER AVE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BUILDING MAINTENANCE GOLF BALANCE SHEET 333.53 276055 9/1/2005 101016 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 1,202.53 INTERLACHEN TRAIL 11897-1 5211 -9 157.28 SIGNAL REVISION 119238 5356 -5 1,359.81 - 276056 9/1/2005 116535 ST PAUL TRAVELERS 1,000.00 DEDUCTIBLE 119300 000215346 1,000.00 276057 91112005 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC 39.09 BELT 119239 S140342 39.09 276058 9/112005 100650 STANLEY SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC 20.34 KEYS 119026 MN- 379601 20.34 276059 9/112005 106452 STONE, HOLLY 550.00 ARTWORK 119301 082405 550.00 07091.1705.20 06038.1705.20 1550.6200 1553.6530 1646.6406 5400.2072 REPAIR PARTS - GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN INSURANCE REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES MEN'S CLUB BUILDING MAINTENANCE COLLECTION SYSTEMS EDINBOROUGH PARK SIDEWALK INTERLACHEN /BLAKE TS -38 W 77 & COMPUTER AVE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BUILDING MAINTENANCE GOLF BALANCE SHEET c R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/31/2005 8:12:35 Council Check Register Page - 25 8/26/2005 - 9/1/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 276060 9/1/2005 101015 STREICHERS 287.90 SQUAD REPAIRS 119027 1287143 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 476.00 SQUAD INSTALLATION 119028 1287153 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 3,973.65 NEW SQUAD BUILDUP 119029 1287142 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 73.90 UNIFORMS 119353 1287905 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 4,811.45 276061 9/112005 117706 STS CONSULTANTS LTD 579.05 STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS 119240 273884 04287.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION STORM SEWER CONCORD 8 SCHOOL 579.05 276062 91112005 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 23.86 CABLES, WASHERS 118972 403127CVW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 359.00 REPAIRS 118973 CVCB487827 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 382.86 276063 9/1/2005 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. 179.71 TIRE 118974 10041515 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 179.71 276064 911/2005 100794 SWANSON, HAROLD 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 119040 090105 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 276065 9/1/2005 111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC. - 35.00 BEERLINE CLEANING 118975 357748 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL 35.00 276066 911/2005 101025 TAMARACK MATERIALS INC. 68.16 CEILING TILE 119354 7055823 -00 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 184.03 CEILING TILE 119355 7055980 -00 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 34.08- CREDIT 119356 7055982 -00 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 218.11 276067 9/112005 101027 TARGET 44.02 FAMILY JAMBOREE 119241 ACCT9340055421 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 820.72 SOCKS FOR ADVENTURE PK 119241 ACCT9340055421 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 39.74 SUPPLIES 119302 081805 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 904.48 276068 91112005 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 883.25 118976 383463 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL CITY OF EDINA 8/31/2005 8:12:35 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 26 8126/2005 - 9/1/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 230.00 119089 18993 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 624.00 119426 - 383668 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,649.75 119427 383121 5862.5514- COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,309.85 119428 383833 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 82.50 119429 383834 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 8,779.35 276069 9/1/2005 102742 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLAN 6,269.00 BRIDGE INSPECTION 118977 000200502980 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 364.80 METRO LIFT STATIONS 118978 000200502966 10026.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION LS -26 LIFT STATION 14 6,633.80 276070 9/112005 101633 TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS INC. 1,798.50 NSF COLLECTIONS 119090 15291 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1 ,798.50 276071 911/2005 100682 TRUGREEN- CHEMLAWN 53.25 WEED CONTROL 119242 VARIOUS 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 111.83 WEED CONTROL 119242 VARIOUS 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 111.83 WEED CONTROL 119242 VARIOUS 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 276.91 276072 9/11/2005 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE 103.38 HINGES 119357 125281 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 67.96- SIGN RETURN 119358 125282 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 495.36 DOOR CLOSER, KICK PLATES 119359 127341 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 66.97 DOOR PULLS 119360 126955 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 597.75 276073 9/112005 101172 TWIN CITY SAW CO. 91.48 OIL PUMP, WORM GEAR 119243 A11783 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 91.48 276074 911/2005 101051 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 2,104.57 UNIFORM PURCHASE 119030 073105 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,104.57 276075 9/112005 101053 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY 65.61 POWER PACK 119031 466107 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 65.61 276076 9/1/2005 100371 UNITED RENTALS :t CITY OF EDINA 8/31/2005 8:12:35 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 27 8/26/2005 - 9/1/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 907.13 LIFT RENTAL 119361 49468220 -001 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 907.13 276077 91112005 101055 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 35.00 MN MUTCD TRAINING 118979 082305 1240.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL 35.00 276078 91112005 103298 UPS STORE #1715, THE 6.25 SHIPPING CHARGES 119362 8 13 /05STMT 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES- CITY HALL GENERAL 8.12 SHIPPING CHARGES 119362 8 /3 /05STMT 1490.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC HEALTH - 64.73 SHIPPING CHARGES. 119362 8/3 /05STMT 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 79.10 276079 9/1/2005 101908 US FOODSERVICE INC 407.41 CONCESSIONS 119245 33537547 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 407.41 2T6080 9/1/2005 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 65.34 FLOAT SWITCH -119032 026572 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL °TURF CARE 189.58 EXTRACTOR SLEDGEHAMMER 119244 022202 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 254.92 276081 9/1/2005 100050 USPS 4,000.00 ACCT #75983 119246 082405 1550.6235 POSTAGE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 4,000.00 - 276082 91112005 103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 4,119.00 WATER MAIN REPAIR 119091 9793 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 4,119.00 276083 9/1/2005 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 109.88 TISSUE 118980 595766 5430.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 273.71 TISSUE, TOWELS 119033 594907 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 15.71- CREDIT 119247 594990 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 367.88 276084 9/1/2005 101060 VANTAGE ELECTRIC 315.00 WIRE OUTLETS 118981 18245 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 315.00 276085 9/112005 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS ,77 118982 3625562246 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 1552.6530 5862.5513 5842.5513 5923.6180 03417.1705.30 1553.6201 1419.6102 '203 REPAIR PARTS 8131/2005 8:12:35 Page - 28 Business Unit PUBLIC HEALTH ASSESSING INSPECTIONS PLANNING COMMUNICATIONS ADMINISTRATION PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL POOL OPERATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GOLF CARS GOLF CARS CENT SVC PW BUILDING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS LAUNDRY CONTRACTUAL SERVICES UNIFORM ALLOWANCE COLLECTION SYSTEMS SS SUNNYSLOPE WOODHILL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN RESERVE PROGRAM POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,655.00 CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 9/1/2005 101786 VIDEO PROTECTION SERVICES 722.96 Council Check Register 119248 . 3768 8/2612005 - 9/1/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No . Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 8.30 118982 3625562246 1490.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 9.30 118982- 3625562246 1190.6188 TELEPHONE 27.86 118982 3625562246 1495.6188 TELEPHONE 34.11 276089 118982 3625562246 - 1140.6188 TELEPHONE 46.80 118982 3625562246 2210.6188 TELEPHONE 53.36 118982 3625562246 1120.6188 TELEPHONE 92.80 118982 3625562246 1640.6188, TELEPHONE 120.65 276090 118982 3625562246 1600.6188 TELEPHONE 130.44 118982 3625562246 5311.6188 TELEPHONE 168.60 118982 3625562246 1470.6188 TELEPHONE 577.31 276091 119034 3625565118 1400.6188 TELEPHONE 1,270.30 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 119039 276086 9/1/2005 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 100.00 1,905.00 GOLF CAR RENTAL 119092 20809 5423.6216 LEASE LINES 750.00 GOLF CAR RENTAL 119093 20602 5423.6216 LEASE LINES 1552.6530 5862.5513 5842.5513 5923.6180 03417.1705.30 1553.6201 1419.6102 '203 REPAIR PARTS 8131/2005 8:12:35 Page - 28 Business Unit PUBLIC HEALTH ASSESSING INSPECTIONS PLANNING COMMUNICATIONS ADMINISTRATION PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL POOL OPERATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GOLF CARS GOLF CARS CENT SVC PW BUILDING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS LAUNDRY CONTRACTUAL SERVICES UNIFORM ALLOWANCE COLLECTION SYSTEMS SS SUNNYSLOPE WOODHILL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN RESERVE PROGRAM POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,655.00 276087 9/1/2005 101786 VIDEO PROTECTION SERVICES 722.96 CABLE, HARDWARE 119248 . 3768 722.96 276088 9/1/2005 102218 VINTAGE ONE WINES 207.20 119189 9749 244.60 119430 9773 451.80 276089 911/2005 101953 VISU -SEWER CLEAN & SEAL INC 1,600.00 SEAL MANHOLES 118983 17981 2,940.00 SEWER REPAIR 119435 17982 4,540.00 276090 91112005 104820 VOELKER, JAMES 55.16 UNIFORM PURCHASE 118984 082205 55.16 276091 911/2005 101080 WALSH, WILLIAM 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 119039 - 090105 100.00 276092 9/112005 101944 WATERSTREET, JOAN M '.84 UNIFORM PURCHASE 119036 082305 1552.6530 5862.5513 5842.5513 5923.6180 03417.1705.30 1553.6201 1419.6102 '203 REPAIR PARTS 8131/2005 8:12:35 Page - 28 Business Unit PUBLIC HEALTH ASSESSING INSPECTIONS PLANNING COMMUNICATIONS ADMINISTRATION PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL POOL OPERATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GOLF CARS GOLF CARS CENT SVC PW BUILDING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS LAUNDRY CONTRACTUAL SERVICES UNIFORM ALLOWANCE COLLECTION SYSTEMS SS SUNNYSLOPE WOODHILL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN RESERVE PROGRAM POLICE DEPT. GENERAL c ► R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation Subledger Account Description 41.84 119303 276093 9/1/2005 1628.6103.07 105440 WEIGLE, SUE SENIOR CITIZENS 40.00 PETTY CASH 1628.6513 52.41 PETTY CASH 119303 105.16 PETTY CASH GENERAL SUPPLIES 197.57 119094 276094 9/1/2005 5841.6103 103266 WELSH COMPANIES LLC YORK OCCUPANCY 593.65 SEPT MAINTENANCE 4400.6710 593.65 CITY HALL/POLICE BUILDING 276095 9/1/2005 082205 118662 WESLEY TREE MOVING MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 8,320.00 LANDSCAPE JUNIPERS 082205 8,320.00 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 276096 9/1/2005 118986 105613 WICKLUND, MITZI 5300.1705 37.06 WORKSHOP EXPENSE 102.72 WORKSHOP EXPENSE 139.78 276097 9/1/2005 103336 WILLIAMS ARCHITECTS 313.66 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 313.66 276098 9/1/2005 118671 WILSON, PAT 27.54 OVERPAYMENT REFUND 27.54 276099 9/1/2005 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 426.40 1,286.40 176.00 5.33- 276100 9/1/2005 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 969.93 672.00 1,955.90 CITY OF EDINA 8/31/2005 8:12:35 Council Check Register Page - 29 8/26/2005 -- 9/1/2005 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 119303 082505 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 119303 082505 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 119303 082505 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 119094 090105 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY 118985 PO 4000 4400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CITY HALL/POLICE BUILDING 119249 082205 1190.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ASSESSING 119249 082205 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING 118986 0011402 5300.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 119095 082405 5900.1211.1 ACCTS RECEIVABLE MANUAL UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 119190 122327 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 119191 122375 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 119192 121481 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 119193 122186 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 119194 122183-00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 119431 122326-00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 119195 132358 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 119196 132422 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 119197 132359 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8131/2005 8:12:35 Council Check Register Page 30 8/26/2005 - 9/1/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 37.26- 119198 25440 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,370.70 119432 133031 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,477.50 119433 133032 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 8,408.77 276101 9H 12005 112954 WISCONSIN TURF EQUIPMENT CORP. 70.91 PINS 118987 517903 -001 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 70.91 276102 911/2005 118368 WOLFF, SARA 244.22 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 119035 072505 1644.6107 - MILEAGE.OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 244.22 276103 9/1/2005 104633 WOODBECK, SHEILA 52.00 TRIP REFUND 119304 082405 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS SENIOR CITIZENS 52.00 276104 91112005 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 3,097.25 119199 168182 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING; _ 248.00 119434 168108 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,345.25 276105 9/1/2005 101087 WROBLESKI, HENRY 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 119043 090105 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 276106 911/2005 101726 XCEL ENERGY 2,521.89 51- 5005454 -3 119363 38507311 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 56.86 51 -4420190 -3 119364 38644772 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 4,879.82 51- 5605640 -1 119365 38271261 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 2,701.57 51- 5547446 -1 119366 38698778 1628.6185 LIGHT & POWER SENIOR CITIZENS 315.62 514197645 -8 119367 38488096 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 1,630.27 51- 5107681 -4 119368 38532447 5111.6185 LIGHT & POWER ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 13,880.68 51- 6644819 -9 119369 38553011 5620.6185 LIGHT & POWER EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,008.68 51- 6223269 -1 119370 38541398 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 26,995.39 276107 911/2005 106424 YELLOW BOOK USA 483.00 AD LISTING 119305 080305 5610.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 483.00 276108 911/2005 117094 YOUTH FOOTBALL YEARBOOK - R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation 90.00 AD 90.00 276109 91112005: ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 22.54 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 22.54 276110 91112005 101091 ZIEGLER INC 78.41 TUBE KIT 78.41 665,884.78 Grand Total CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/26/2005 — 9/1/2005 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 119250 070705 5210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 119371 54064965 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 119096 PC000823762 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 665,884.78 Total Payments 665,884.78 8/31/2005 8:12:35 Page - 31 Business Unit GOLF DOME PROGRAM PSTF OCCUPANCY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKSUM LOG20000 Company 01000 GENERAL FUND 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND 05100 ART CENTER FUND 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 05800 LIQUOR FUND 05900 UTILITY FUND 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND Report Totals Amount 324,355.26 1,716.40 58,641.26 2,286.12 1,820.47 1,238.68 1,448.51 23,420.22 1,190.60 25,572.99 171,795.91 32,066.34 20,121.20 210.82 665,884.78 CITY OF EDINA 8/31/2005 8:33:43 Council Check Summary Page - 1 8126/2005 - 9/112005 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing licies and procedures dat ( . of Finarur Di City A,. .o Ce 0 ,aaa To: Mayor & City Council From: John Wallin Finance Director Date: September 6, 2005 Subject: Set Maximum Tax Levies Recommendation: REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item # VII.B. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ® Resolution T-1 Ordinance ❑ Discussion Adopt Resolution No. 2005 -74 setting the maximum proposed 2006 tax levies of $18,560,151 for the General Fund, $1,081,536 for the debt service of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority Public Project Revenue Bonds Series 2002 (year 5 of City Hall debt service levy), $159,100 for debt service of equipment certificates of indebtedness, and $420,205 for the debt service of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority Public Project Revenue Bonds Series 2005A (year 1 of Gymnasium debt service levy). The total market value based referendum levy would be set at $599,138. Information /Background: Total of the five levies would increase by $1,152,578 or 5.86 %. The preliminary General Fund budget is $25,380,248. The preliminary budget including all debt levies is $27,640,227. The referendum levy was set in 1996 when the GO Park and Recreation bonds Series 1996B were issued and reset recently when the remaining bonds were refunded by GO Park and Recreation Refunding. Bonds, Series 2005A. As a function of the bond issuance all remaining levies were set by law at 105% of the corresponding annual debt service payments. The debt service fund is now sufficient to cover any foreseeable tax shortages and I would recommend canceling the portion of the 2006 levy in excess of the annual debt service payment. Future referendum levies remain at the 105% level and would require canceling a portion of the levy on the annual basis depending on'the amount needed to maintain a sufficient debt service fund. RESOLUTION NO. 2005-74 City of Edina RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF EDINA FOR THE YEAR 2006 AND ESTABLISHING TAX LEVY FOR THE YEAR 2006 PAYABLE, IN 2006 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA MINNESOTA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: TOTAL GENERAL FUND $ 25,380,248 DEBT SERVICE OF THE HRA PUBLIC PROJECT BOLDS - SERIES 2002 $ 1,081,536 DEBT SERVICE OF EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATES $ 159,100 DEBT SERVICE OF THE HRA PUBLIC PROJECT BONDS - SERIES 2005A $ 420,205 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 27,041,089 Section 2. Estimated receipts other than the General Tax Levy are hereby proposed as follows: TOTAL ESTIMATED RECEIPTS $ 6,820,097 Section 3, That there is proposed to be levied upon all taxable real and personal property in the City of Edina a tax rate sufficient to produce the amounts as follows: GENERAL FUND $ 18,560,151 LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF HRA PUBLIC PROJECT BONDS - SERIES 2002 $ 1,081,536 LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATES $ 159,100 LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF HRA PUBLIC PROJECT BONDS - SERIES 2005A $ 420,205 TOTAL LEVY $ 20,220,992 Section 4. That there is proposed to be levied upon all taxable real and personal property in the City of Edina a tax rate sufficient to produce the amount below for the debt levy of the market value based referendum levy and canceling the portion of the levy not required to produce the following amount: GO PARK AND RECREATION BONDS SERIES 199613/2005A $ 599,138 Passed and adopted by the City Council on September 6, 2005. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor City Hall 1 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk FOR the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 6, 2005, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular. Meeting. WITNESS my hand.and seal of said City this 2 day of , 20_. City Clerk 1 REPORPRECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # VII.C. From: John Wallin Consent ❑ Finance Director Information Only ❑ Date: September 6, 2005 p Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Truth in Taxation Hearing Action ® Motion Dates Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Attached is a calendar showing the dates that are available to hold the City's Truth in Taxation hearings. I recommend that the City Council set Monday, December 5 at 5:00 p.m. for the Truth in Taxation initial hearing; Monday, December 12, at 5:00 p.m. for the continuation hearing; and Tuesday, December 20, at 7:00 p.m. for the budget adoption hearing. Info /Background: Unless the proposed tax increase is less-than the increase in the implicit price deflator (5.07 %), cities are required to hold Truth in Taxation Hearings on their proposed total budgets and proposed property tax levies for the taxes payable year 2006 from November 29 through December 20, 2005. The City Council needs to set the initial and continuation hearing dates now. The adoption hearing can be set anytime between now and the close of the Truth in Taxation hearing(s). The County, school districts and the metropolitan special taxing districts have chosen their initial and continuation hearings. The Legislature has set aside the first two Mondays in December for the use of the cities. We can use. those dates or select other dates that do not conflict as listed on the attached calendar. The dates on the attached calendar referencing "Initial" are not available for the initial Truth in Taxation hearing as they conflict with other Truth in Taxation hearings. The continuation hearing may conflict with other jurisdictions continuation hearings if the City deems it necessary. Initial Public Hearing The official adoption of the final levy and budget cannot occur at this hearing, a subsequent hearing for adoption must be held; If the City does not hold a continuation hearing for public comment, the time and date of the levy and budget adoption hearing must be announced during the initial hearing. When a Truth in Taxation hearing is held on the same night as a regular Council meeting, the Truth in Taxation hearing would be convened, and adjourned prior to conducting the business of the regular Council meeting. o The City Council may, at their option, conduct a more joint Truth in Taxation public hearing by including a board member from th'e County or the School Districts. Cities can elect to hold a joint hearing by adopting a resolution, and by notifying the other taxing authorities and requesting that a member of the other body attend the joint hearing. The City Council may also invite each state senator and representative who represents the City to, attend the joint heating. . Continuation Hearing If the City continues the Truth in Taxation discussion, the time and date of the continuation hearing must be announced at the initial hearing. The hearing date must be at least 5 business days 'but no more than 14 business days after the initial public hearing, but in no case later than December 20, 2005. The City may adopt its final levy and budget at a hearing immediately following the continuation hearing. Levy and Budget Adoption Hearing The hearing must be held separately from the official Truth in. Taxation hearing(s). The date for this hearing does not have to be scheduled through the County Auditor but must be announced at the conclusion of the initial hearing, or the continuation hearing, if one is held. This hearing must be at least one day after the initial hearing if a continuation hearing is not needed. If a continuation hearing is held, thenadoption hearing can be held immediately following the continuation hearing,' or else the City Council must announce the date, time and place for the budget adoption hearing prior to the adjournment of the continuation hearing. At the adoption hearing the City Council must take public official action to adopt both the final levy and budget through a resolution. If the budget adoption hearing is held in conjunction with a regular City Council meeting, the budget adoption hearing must occur during the public portion of the meeting, and at a time that is specifically designated as the Truth in Taxation hearing. ° I November 2005. S M W November 2005 �2005 5 T W T F 5 S M� T W T F 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 December 2005 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 11 12 13 14 16 17 22 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 iB 19 20 21 22 23 24 27 28 29 30 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 INITIAL INITIAL • 191 201. 211 221 23 241 A AGENDA ITEM: VII.D. HORSEY DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Gordon Hughes, City Manager FROM: Jerome P. Gilligan DATE: September 1, 2005 RE: Proposed Issuance of Revenue Bonds by the Minneapolis Community Development Agency for Southdale YMCA The City has received a request from Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Minneapolis (the "YMCA ") that the City consent to the issuance by the Minneapolis Community Development Agency (the "MCDA ") of tax - exempt revenue bonds under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.152 to 469.165, to finance improvements to the Southdale YMCA and the purchase of items of equipment to be installed therein. The City has previously consented to other cities issuing revenue bonds to finance facilities of other non - profit corporations in the City, including earlier this year when it consented to the issuance by the City of Minneapolis of bonds the proceeds which were used with respect to Fairview Southdale Hospital. Federal law for tax - exempt bonds requires that the City hold a public hearing on the. proposed financing prior to giving such approval. The bonds would be issued as part of a larger issue by the MCDA to finance projects at other YMCA facilities in Andover, Minneapolis, Minnetonka and New Hope Not more than $1,000,000 of the principal amount of the bonds will be expended with respect to the Southdale YMCA. The debt service on the bonds will be payable solely from payments to be made by the YMCA, and the City will not have any liability with respect to the bonds and will not be required to enter into any agreements with respect to the bonds. The YMCA will pay all City expenses with respect to the bonds. If the City Council wishes to proceed with the issuance of the bonds it should adopt a resolution setting a public hearing on the bonds for the October 4h City Council meeting. DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP RESOLUTION 2005 -75 r� SET HEARING DATE OF OCTOBER 4, 2005, FOR REVENUE BONI) FINANCING FOR City of Edina YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION (YMCA) OF METROPOLITAN MINNEAPOLIS WHEREAS, The Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Minneapolis (the "Corporation "), intends to provide for the financing of equipment and the improvement of various administrative office, community program and health enhancement facilities in the cities of New Hope, Minneapolis, Andover, Edina and Minnetonka (collectively the "Project "), through a revenue bond in the amount of up to $5,000,000 (the "Bond ") to' be issued by the Minneapolis Community Development Agency (the "Issuer "); and WHEREAS, because one of the facilities to be financed is located in the City of Edina (the "City "), it is necessary for the City to hold a public hearing and then approve the issuance of the Bond by the Issuer; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. The City Council shall hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. central time on Tuesday, October 4, 2005, at the Council Chambers in City Hall, 4801 W. 501h Street, Edina, Minnesota, to provide an opportunity for interested individuals to express their views on the proposed issuance of the Bond and the nature of the Project. The City Clerk shall cause a notice of public hearing in substantially the form attached as Exhibit A to be published in the official newspaper of the City no fewer than fourteen (14) and no more than thirty (30) days before the hearing. Adopted: September 6, 2005. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 6, 2005, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 20_. City Clerk City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSED PROJECT AND THE ISSUANCE OF A REVENUE BOND TO FINANCE VARIOUS YMCA FACILITIES Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City") will meet on Tuesday, October 4, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers in the City Hall, located at 4801 W. 50`h Street, Edina, Minnesota, for the purpose of conducting a public hearing on a proposal by The Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Minneapolis (the "Corporation ") that the City approve the issuance by the Minneapolis Community Development Agency (the "Issuer ") of a revenue bond in the approximate amount of $5,000,000 (the "Bond "), to finance a project more fully described below, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 through 469.165 (the "Act "). The project includes various construction, renovation, equipment and related costs incurred or to be incurred by the Corporation with respect to various administrative office, community program and health enhancement facilities located at the following addresses: 30 S. Ninth Street, Minneapolis; 2125 E. Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis; 4 W. Rustic Lodge, Minneapolis; 3335 Blaisdell Avenue S., Minneapolis; 4100 28th Avenue S., Minneapolis; 1711 West Broadway, Minneapolis; 1801 University Avenue S.E., Minneapolis; 2304 Jackson Street N.E., Minneapolis; 15200 Hanson Boulevard, Andover; 7601 42 °d Avenue, New Hope; 12301 Ridgedale Drive, Minnetonka; and 7355 York Avenue S., Edina. The amount of the Bond proceeds to be expended on the facility in Edina will not exceed $1,000,000. The Bond and interest thereon shall not be payable from nor charged against any funds of the City or the Issuer other than revenue pledged for the payment thereof, nor shall the City or the Issuer be subject to any liability thereon. No holders of the obligations shall ever have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City or the Issuer to pay the obligations or the interest thereon, nor to enforce payment against any property of the City or the Issuer. Such obligations shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City or the Issuer, nor shall the same constitute a debt of the City or the Issuer within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitations. All persons interested may appear and be heard at the time and place set forth above or may submit written comments in advance of the hearing. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL Debra A. Mangen. City Clerk Dated: September 1, 2005 PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE EDINA SUN - CURRENT THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2005 PLEASE SEND TWO AFFIDAVITS OF PUBLICATION BILL TO EDINA CITY CLERK f To: Mayor & City Council From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date:. September 6, 2005 Subject: Receive petition o REPORT/RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item # VIII. A. ° Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends To HRA ®° To Council Action ® Motion Resolution Ordinance Discussion Recommendation: Refer the petition received to Engineering for processing as to feasibility. Info/Background: The City received the attached petition circulated by Ann Moore requesting street lighting be installed 'on South Knoll Drive between Knoll Drive and South Knoll Drive. There were seventeen property owners 'from South Knoll Drive, Knoll Drive, Dovre Drive, Newport Drive and Parkwood signing the petition. The City's normal procedure is to refer the petition to the Engineering Department for processing as to feasibility. City of Edina, Minnesota CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 .�. (612) 927 -8861 • (612) 927- 7645 -FAX • (612) 927: 5461 -TDD PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: ❑ WATERMAIN X STREET LIGHTING ❑ OTHER: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements li the locations listed below. fq AV-1 between S 1� --�"� \ aid LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS A; LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME between between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS and \ ADDRESS and ADDRESS and _ i � 1 xz� ove to Ati. IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME SIGNATURE / (PRINTED) . 7 PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S PHq���\ � a � a S. -n t, t✓ lR _ a 33- log � �- vY S. k'.011 ys,q f3.? - & SZ -533-- 4046 this petition was circulated by: A rv� ( NAME ADDROS PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages. SEPTEMBER 19W PROPERTY OWNER'S SIG, NATURE OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S PHONE Re� C.-fk I yi A i 2,13 90 KNN L- 13& - 01 01 �v JL J re- 2,13 90 KNN L- 13& - 01 01 �v JL J ., s laa To: Mayor & City Council From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: September 6, 2005 Subject: Receive petition REPORT/RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item # VIII. B. Consent Information Only F-1 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion F] Resolution ❑ Ordinance Discussion Recommendation: Refer the petition received to Engineering for processing as to feasibility. Info/Background: The City received the attached petition circulated by James Angelle requesting street reconstruction of Dever Drive, Park Place and Woodcrest Drive. There were thirteen property owners from Dever Drive, Park Place and Woodcrest Drive signing the petition. The City's normal procedure is to refer the petition to the Engineering Department for processing as to feasibility. `f. 113A.f o e �� City of Edina, Minnesota CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 j (612) 927-8861 • (612) 927- 7645-FAX • (612) 9275"1-TDD PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER DATE: r,,E)4. -z ay.gp71Cr ❑ WATERMAIN ❑ STREET LIGHTING ❑ OTHER: To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. -DEve-P, D2 \./c between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME QA KK, PLAC.t I between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME 'W(D0 D CRC-ST D &I VC between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME and ADDRESS ADDRESS and ADDRESS ADDRESS and ADDRESS ADDRESS FM ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME SIGNATURE (PRINTED) W46211", �ffj-- .its petition was circulated by: JAMS AN EI i l= c� ol PROPERTY ADDRESS 5-5-01 PA9K PLACE S 7_y r.2:2 nto Pe (-.o OWNER'S PHONE 952-) 922- 9286 C?$a ga6 -a &�z NAME ADDRESS PHONE �3 8Q There is space for more signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages. MEMBER 1990 OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) ;;-Iftmsffi ojelrA fz�4:et 724aL ) T1, GGi Q) C- 0 C-i tA e /Coc Lo LJ ij OWNER'S PHONE sic C,, � 553 e- 33 t A o Le Cn �y •f ,moo• ss. AGENDA ITEM: X.A. MEETING WITH LEGISLATIVE DELEGATION VN No packet data ❑ Oral presentation 1-1 Information coming EDINA AFFORDABLE HOUSING TASK FORCE Meeting Minutes August 10, 2005 7:30 AM — Edina City Hall Members Present: Bob Aderhold, Valerie Burke, Hal Clapp, Kandace Ellis, Michael Fischer, John Helling, Mike Huck, Jeff Huggett, Sally Krusell, Scott Massie, Doug Mayo, Barb McFarlane, Sharon Ming, Joan Naymark, Janice Williams Staff. Joyce Repya Consultants: Stacy Becker, Kimberly Gartner . Chair Mayo called the meeting to order at 7:30 AM. Actions Taken • Member Huck seconded Member William's motion to approve the agenda; the motion carried. • Member Ming seconded Member Naymark's motion to approve the minutes of July 27, 2005; the motion carried. Announcements • The contract between Becker Consulting and the City of Edina is moving forward. RPC approved the budget recommendations, which included recommendations to continue to earmark dollars for the Affordable Housing Task Force in 2006. The Human Rights & Relations Commission also approved the budget recommendations and entering into a contract provided that payments were tied to milestones. • RPC modified the contract with Becker Consulting with an interim step. The contract has moved on to the City Attorney for review. • The Edina City Council will review the budget recommendation on August 23`d. On January 1, 2006, the budget is official. • Chair Mayo introduced Stacy Becker and her team to the members of the Task Force. Discussion of Survey Results, Housing Data, Goals and Values Stacy Becker reviewed the process for moving forward. Each meeting is designed to build upon the previous meeting and to produce components of the final report. Each report component will be refined over time. • The August 10 meeting is to ground the consulting work, provide housing data, and start the discussion of goals, values, and specific strategies. • The next meeting will be focused on specifically defining goals and values. • Three sessions will be devoted to specific strategies. • The last two meetings will lead to action plans and the final report. Kimberly Gartner overviewed the survey findings. Stacy Becker provided a housing overview that analyzed existing data according to affordable housing standards. • The goal of the housing overview is to provide pictures that tell Edina's story without getting too bogged down in the data. • The overview included comparisons between Edina, its neighboring cities, cities selected by Task Force members for comparison, and cities leading affordable housing efforts in the Twin Cities metropolitan area. Tables and charts included data on housing prices; housing affordability; units of affordable housing; and ages, wages and commuting patterns of Edina workers and residents. Task force members were asked to identify one goal and one strategy for achieving the goal. Discussion points included: • Dense rental housing would be most affordable for young families, but it doesn't fit into the "American dream." While developments can be dense, beautiful, and well - designed, it would require an additional educational process as it does not fit the mold. • To fund affordable rental of single family housing, there could be a fee that is similar to the 7 percent park land fee. This option is attractive if you won't be impacted by the fee. • The City will likely need to be a more active player in affordable housing, because affordable housing does not provide a strong economic incentive. The City will likely need to set and implement policy (relating to production or resale of homes, second mortgages, land trusts, etc.), even through its operating philosophy has been to not interfere in the market place. • Open enrollment demand at Edina schools could provide opportunities for creative pairing between families wanting to move into the district and seniors wanting to move or downsize. •. To increase the stock of single family housing, policies might explore smaller lot sizes, multi -units on a single lot, carriage housing, using church land, mortgage assistance for teachers, or employee housing on school district property. • The Mayo Clinic's housing model may provide lessons for employer- assisted housing for Fairview. Adjournment There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:05 AM. Page 1 of 2 Darlene Wallin From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 8:00 AM To: Darlene Wallin Subject: FW: (no subject) From: Gretasimll @aol.com [mailto:Gretasimll @aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 5:43 PM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Cc: Tsmeeh @aol.com; rdswanstrom @att.net; nhaley @mn.rr.com; rdswanstrom @worldnet.att.net Subject: (no subject) Please forward this email to the mayor and city council members for review before their meeting on September 6. My name is Greta Simondet and I live at 4448 Vandervork Avenue. I want to express my disappointment and dismay regarding the City Council meeting's vote on August 16 re: Todd Park. I will try to balance my negative feedback with positive: Negative: 1. The decision seems to be irrational, not logical. Just read the minutes or watch the video, and use reason: 2. Mayor Hovland said he supported a rink because of the needs of young families. The reason Todd Park was first brought up was not the young families - -it was the park board looking for a spot to replace the Countryside rink. Young families' needs have been met very well with the current set up of a family skating rink. 3. The Todd Park rink is presented as a trial run. However, there are no guidelines for what is to be measured. Of course it will get used. If you build it, they will come, wherever it is built. Most of the use will come from older kids, teens, and young adults as it is in other hockey rinks, and much of the use will come from outside the neighborhood. So if you measure use, measure ages, place of residence, and measure use in each of the other hockey rinks in Edina to be fair. 4. Countryside rink was torn down without a well- researched plan to replace it. That is wrong. And it feels like we are getting this shoved down our throats in the interest of time and desperation for this winter's hockey season. However, the Edina Hockey Association rep said at the meeting that they could make do without the extra sheet this year. 5. George Klus, the park board chair had said that you needed to trust them, and that they had worked very very hard on this and this is their recommendation. Have I missed something? I attended several of the park board meetings - -he said they spent 5 meetings looking at the issue. Did they do a lot of behind - the - scenes -work? Because if he is saying it was hard work because some of the meetings were lengthy, the neighbors have worked very very hard, too. And we have done a lot of behind - the - scenes work. Mr. Klus's plea to vote his way because of his hard work isn't enough. Acquaint yourselves with the minutes of those meetings and you may come to the same conclusion I have, that I felt that the park board ignored what the opposition presented. And be fair to us, the neighbors - -we deserve to be listened to and respected and we will be impacted more than anyone else. 6. Wanting to utilize the shelter to its fullest and thus build a rink is reverse logic. It implies that maybe this decision was underway a few years back. The neighborhood had wanted a simpler structure with basically restrooms and a water fountain and a shelter like a gazebo for shade. Now that this expensive structure is in existence, it is not necessary to rationalize it by building a $40,000 rink that the neighborhood doesn't want. See the Positive list for alternative uses and rationalizations for the shelter. 7. Our neighborhood did not ask for the rink. When we heard about it, some people, and it seems that most of them live several blocks away, became proponents of it, including Pat Cromin who is directly involved in the Hockey Association. Several people gave charming scenarios of what it was like in their childhood or what they want it like for their kids. If they get in their car and drive approximately 5 minutes, they can have that in a different park. And please consider if those people who live several blocks away would actually let their kids walk in the dark, down streets with no sidewalks in the very cold part of winter to go alone to the rink and back. Life has changed since they were kids - -we need to watch our kids more carefully because we are more aware of the dangers in our society. 9/1/2005 Page 2 of 2 8. 1 really think that Ann Swenson should have excused herself from the vote since she had a son -in -law who was all for it and a good friend on the park board - -it would be hard for herself to sit back and be fair - -she said something to a similar affect at the meeting as far as her reasons for making her decision. 9. The stench of the rink on the wetland will affect the Todd Park neighborhood much more than placing the rink in a different park since the neighbors in other parks don't live as close and have evergreen trees or hills separating their homes from the rinks. And Todd Park was built on a wetland, so it will be more pungent than those other parks. Positive: 1. The rep for the Edina Hockey Association said they could make do without the extra sheet of ice this year. We are not in a desperate situation. 2. Utilize the shelter in different ways, like teens' music night, or senior citizens groups events, or a cross - country ski club, etc. One person spoke at the meeting stating some great ideas for alternative uses. 3. Put the temporary hockey rink in a different park, one of those recommended by the Meehans in their presentation, where a hockey rink already exists and is not in view of neighbors and already has a parking lot. Why would they object when they already have a rink there? And it would be easier for maintenance staff to maintain two rinks in the same place and a wiser use of resources. 4. Keep Todd Park the gem it is. It doesn't need anything else. It is small. 5. Or put a temporary hockey rink up and try out temporary boards. There are experts who disagree with Vince Cockriel's opinion that they aren't very good. If this is a two year trial, please don't waste $40,000 into a rink that is permanent. More than likely the decision would be made to leave the rink up because of the expense of removing. 6. Or put up the two year rink in Lewis Park, where you are considering long term solutions. More'than likely another rink will be built there and so do this 2 year trial there. It is okay that you did not get a chance to poll those neighbors for reasons - -they already have a hockey rink in place (and Todd Park does not) and they are not visually affected by the rink (nor can they hear it or smell it as easily as Todd Park neighbors because of the set up. Besides, you did poll us and the majority said "no." 7. Putting the hockey rink in another park for the logical reasons of already having a parking lot and a hockey rink and not directly affecting the neighbors will result in saving the green space of Todd Park. And keeping the green space matches Edina's long term plan "Edina 20/20" for green space as one of the residents' highest priorities. 8. Be proactive and thoughtful, not rushed and desperate, as you contemplate the use of the parks. Consider the system Eden Prairie implemented. Yes, we are Edina but we can learn from other cities' wise plans. It would be wonderful to plan goals and objectives for the parks. 9. The neighbors of Todd Park are more united now because of this issue. The overwhelming majority of those attending the August 16 meeting were in opposition to the rink. I wish you had asked for a show of hands. It would have made us feel like you were aware of our presence and you'd have seen for yourself our numbers and we would have known our efforts to attend were recognized by you. 10. We live in a democracy and you should really pay attention to the fact that more of the neighbors are in opposition to the rink than are in favor. And please give the neighbors who surround the park more weight in this decision. Compare it to the process for obtaining a variance where the person needs to poll those surrounding their property by 300 feet - -they get the most "say" in the matter. Thank you for reading this and I plead with you to reconsider your decision. It shows strength to admit a .mistake and then to fix it. Thank you! 9/1/2005 Todd Park Darlene Wallin From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Thursday, September.01, 2005 8:01 AM To: Darlene Wallin Subject: FW: Todd Park From: Simondet, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Simondet @ATK.COM] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 7:29 AM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Cc: Simondet, Jeff Subject: Todd Park Edina - mail, please forward to Mayor Hovland and the city council. Mayor Hovland and the city council, Page 1 of 2 I feel compelled to comment on the last city council meeting regarding the Todd Park permanent hockey rink installation issue. You have heard all the reasons why the neighborhood does not want the eye -sore, 8 week available use rink to be installed. I will avoid repeating these again. 1) 1 feel the council missed the boat and to some degree has subverted the democratic process. The opponents to the hockey rink provided a petition of over 300 signatures. I was a little confused at the meeting on what the proponents provided. It seems that they claimed 100 proponents but provided no proof of such. Maybe this was eventually provided, I do not know. Regardless, giving them the benefit of doubt and taking their statement shows a 3 to 1 ratio against. Therefore, it is not just a simple majority against but an overwhelming one. Please listen to your constituent's. 2) From what I have seen and heard the Park Board / City Council did not do their homework on this or were pre - dispositioned to the current outcome. Why wasn't there a plan in place before removal of the rink at Countryside. This shows a lack of planning or a pre- determined plan. This has taken the rink issue from Countryside and made it a Todd Park problem. When was Todd Park first considered? Were these discussions all open to. the public? When a homeowner needs to go through the variance process, they are told it is recommended they talk to all neighbors within 300 feet of their property line, and to seek their pre - approval. This same consideration should be exercised by the city as the precedence is already set in the variance process. To me this shows that the city deems it appropriate to consider the opinions of those most affected with a greater weighting. Add this to the 3 to 1 majority and it becomes hard to understand the current outcome. 3) 1 dispute the firm contention by the Park Board that removable rinks are unsafe and not an option. If the City of Mpls had concerns over their safety they would be compelled not to use them. I'm an engineer and have thought of many improvements to what was described by the Park Board. I would even consider volunteering engineering time if the city were serious in finding the best solution. With specifications of the current board system and that of removable ones, it would be a simple engineering task to design an appropriate solution. It was stated by the Edina Hockey group that they would indeed survive without the 11th sheet of ice. I believe it is the duty of the council to take the appropriate amount of time to make the correct decision. Not to be forced into a bad decision or one that was not made with all the required due diligence. I'm sure the council assumed that was occurring but I do not believe they can honestly say that in hindsight it did. 9/1/2005 Todd Park Page 2 of 2 Please take a moment to reconsider the council's actions. And remember the Mayor and council are elected officials entrusted with performing the people's business. Sincerely, Jeff Simondet 4448 Vandervork Av 952 - 925 -5639 9/1/2005 Ann Lee Zalk 7728 Pondwood Drive Edina, Minnesota 55439 Dear Mayor Hovland, On April 26h of this year, my husband called 911 for me as I was experiencing severe breathing difficulties and was obviously experiencing a life threatening relapse of problems for which I had recently been hospitalized. The response of the Edina police and firemen was amazing! They arrived within minutes, made a quick and accurate assessment of the situation and got me into the ambulance safely. At first they wanted to take me to Fairview Southdale Hospital as it was close to our home and I was obviously in big trouble. However, when my husband told them that Abbott Northwestern was very familiar with my very complicated case, they called Abbott and received orders to bring me there. The ambulance ride was scary, but the fireman in the back with me was calm and reassuring. He even made some jokes about the bumpy ride. My husband was in the front with the driver and was very impressed with the skill he exhibited weaving in and out of traffic on the Crosstown and Hgw. 35W. It is my sincere belief that these men saved my life. I can not thank them enough and I wanted you to know how proud we should be of the police and fire department personnel. The 911 operator was wonderful as well. The police officers we Tim Olson and Kevin Rofidal and the paramedics were Brian Hanrahan and John Brooks. I hope that you put a copy of this letter in each of their personnel files. Sincerely, cc: Fire Chief Marty Scheerer Police Chief Mike Siitari Memo To: Mayor Hovland and Members of the City Council From: Eric Roggeman, Assistant Finance Director Date: September 1, 2005 Re: 2006 CITY BUDGET UPDATES Attached herewith are changes to the proposed 2006 City of Edina budget. Please replace the applicable pages from your original budget packet with these pages. A brief description of each of the changes follows. 1. Pages 1 -4. The revenue summary was updated to include $2,875 in parking ramp revenue in the "License and Permits" category that was erroneously omitted in the first draft. The expenditure summary was also updated to increase expenditures $12,653 in total for changes 2-4 listed below. The net effect of all of these changes is a $9,778 increase in property taxes, which is also reflected in the revenue summary. 2. Pages 19 -23. The Public Works expenditure budget was increased by $5,000 for public education materials for the Edina Transportation Commission. 3. Pages 46-49. The Police Protection expenditure budget was increased by $7,653 due to an error made in payroll calculations. 4. Pages 72 -73. The Park & Recreation budget is unchanged in total; however, certain payroll costs were reallocated to different lines to make the figures more comparable to prior years. • Page 1 P__� i Expenditure Overview Total Expenditures Distribution by Type Central Services 10.2% Equir 4.� Commoditie 4.8% Contractual Services 13.3% Public Works 22.0% Genen Governrr 13 7% Total Expenditures Distribution by Area Non - Departmental Park & Rec. 2.1% 13.3% ilaries 6.8% Public Safety 48.9% CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 1 FUND: GENERAL REVENUE SUMMARY REVENUES SUMMARY 2003 2004 2005 2006 DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL PROPOSED ESTIMATED BUDGETED GENERAL FUND: TAXES: PROPERTY TAXES $15,607,503 $15,629,848 $ 17,772,350 $ 17,772,350 $ 18,560,151 PENALTIES AND INTEREST 22,504 5,592 15,000 15,000 15,000 MARKET VALUE CREDIT - - (528,756) (528,756) (372,664) LOSS DUE TO ABATEMENTS - - 100,000 100,000 100,000 TOTAL TAXES 15,630,007 15,635,440 17,158,594 17,158,594 18,102,487 LICENSE AND PERMITS: HEATNENT LICENSE 45,332 33,991 23,000 23,000 35,000 BUILDING PERMITS 1,399,037 1,465,506 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,460,000 PLUMBING PERMITS 152,563 161,108 110,690 110,690 160,000 MECHANICAL PERMITS 241,901 237,990 250,910 250,910 240,000 WATER CONNECTION 8,000 7,982 - - - DOG LICENSES 13,903 13,207 12,500 12,500 13,000 BEER LICENSE 10,859 10,409 10,000 10,000 11,000 WINE LICENSE 25,167 26,500 25,000 25,000 27,000 LIQUOR LICENSE 95,803 109,923 96,000 96,000 115,000 PARKING RAMP 2,350 - 3,300 3,300 2,875 OTHER PERMITS & LICENSES 3,553 2,526 2,000 2,000 2,000 SPRINKLER PERMITS 25,867 21,545 28,500 28,500 25,000 ALARM PERMITS 8,995 6,802 9,270 9,270 8,800 TOBACCO LICENSE 9,395 8,450 8,925 8,925 8,900 FOOD ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE 82,122 83,598 88,200 88,200 88,900 FOOD VENDING LICENSE 3,345 1,875 2,940 2,940 2,000 POOL LICENSE 21,205 21,245 22,050 22,050 22,500 AMUSEMENT DEVICE LICENSE 1,440 630 1,575 1,575 900 LODGING LICENSE 141 282 158 158 450 GARBAGE COLLECTORS LICENSE 13,610 14,145 11,550 11,550 14,000 PARKING GARAGE LICENSE 2,800 2,730 2,625 2,625 2,725 SIGN PERMIT 10,095 9,060 11,000 11,000 9,500 ROAD RESTRICTION PERMITS 4,780 8,255 5,000 5,000 7,000 TOTAL LICENSES AND PERMITS 2,182,263 2,247,759 2,025,193 2,025,193 2,256,550 FEES AND CHARGES: BLDG CODE COMPLIANCE 188 - 300 300 300 OTHER BUILDING FEES 1,268 5,791 1,500 1,500 1,500 LIQUOR PENALTIES 2,000 3,000 - - - OTHER CITY CLERK FEES 9,163 9,254 - - - VENTILATION SYSTEM 14,400 14,160 15,000 15,000 14,000 SPECIAL HAZARD PERMITS 2,525 2,800 3,400 3,400 3,000 FALSE ALARMS FIRE 4,100 15,400 13,000 13,000 11,500 OTHER FIRE FEES 5,046 5,401 4,200 4,200 4,500 AMBULANCE 1,065,177 1,227,400 1,081,500 1,081,500 1,237,300 4�• i i CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 2 FUND: GENERAL REVENUE SUMMARY REVENUES SUMMARY 2003 2004 1 2005 2006 DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL I ESTIMATED I BUDGETED PROPOSED FEES AND CHARGES: DOG IMPOUNDING FEES $ 1,861 $ 4,002 $ 3,700 $ 3,700 $ 3,800 FALSE ALARMS POLICE 36,250 72,295 65,000 65,000 65,000 SAFETY /SECURITY CONTRIBUTION 100,300 165,460• 151,600 151,600 160,560 OTHER POLICE FEES 7,503 9,699 4,000 4,000 6,000 RIGHT OF WAY FEE 11,059 17,431 10,000 10,000 12,000 ENGINEERING & CLERICAL 105,885 87,092 90,000 90,000 90,000 CURB CUT FEE 3,180 2,880 3,800 3,800 3,000 ENGINEERING FEES 6,970 7,484 18,000 18,000 12,000 UNDERGROUND PARK INSPECTION 3,175 2,815 3,150 3,150 3,000 FOOD PLAN REVIEW FEE 2,150 5,120 3,150 3,150 3,200 PLANNING FEES 29,235 21,676 27,000 27,000 24,000 OTHER FEES 7,327 3,275 6,500 6,500 5,500 HOUSING FOUNDATION CONTRACT 24,988 57,666 31,100 31,100 31,700 SERVICES HRA 22,196 21,017 20,000 20,000 20,000 ASSESSING SEARCHES 557 3,188 - - - REGISTRATION FEES 81,777 75,346 77,250 77,250 78,800 SENIOR CENTER FEES 102,149 103,275 103,169 103,169 104,300 50TH & FRANCE ASSESSMENT 17,124 37,300 68,000 68,000 69,000 CHARGES TO OTHER FUNDS 172,320 247,728 263,616 263,616 271,413 TOTAL FEES AND CHARGES 1,839,873 2,227,955 2,067,935 2,067,935 2,235,373 FINES AND FORFEITURES: MUNICIPAL COURT FINES 785,227 863,073 900,000 900,000 875,000 OTHER REVENUES: INCOME ON INVESTMENTS 68,344 83,233 110,000 110,000 150,000 SALE OF PROPERTY 86,044 119,922 45,000 45,000 45,000 RENTAL OF PROPERTY. 267,254 265,085 280,000 280,000 285,000 DONATIONS 5,026 51,040 - - 5,000 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 5,021 73,577 5,000 5,000 5,000 CONTRIBUTION FROM LIQUOR - - 686,500 686,500 700,230 TOTAL OTHER REVENUES 431,689 592,857 1,126,500 1,126,500 1,190,230 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AID: FEDERAL AID 315,517 105,296 51,400 51,400 35,000 STATE AID MAINTENANCE 195,000 195,000 195,000 195,000 195,000 OTHER STATE AID 214,765 217,325 176,634 176,634 170,608 POLICE AID 320,482 321,199 310,000 310,000 320,000 COUNTY HEALTH AID 36,222 121,180 - - - TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENT AID 1,081,9861 960,000 1 733,034 733,034 720,608 DOTAL OPERATING REVENUE 1 $ 21,951,045 $ 22,527,084 $ 24,011,256 $ 24,011,256 $ 25,380,248 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 3 FUND: I GENERAL EXPENDITURE SUMMARY SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2003 2004 2005 2006 DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL PROPOSED ESTIMATED BUDGETED GENERAL FUND: GENERAL GOVERNMENT: MAYOR & COUNCIL $ 77,017 $ 81,993 $ 73,981 $ 73,981 $ 66,706 ADMINISTRATION 888,419 925,549 952,493 959,173 1,011,533 PLANNING 337,665 361,855 368,571 368,571 403,713 FINANCE 538,631 560,818 585,110 585,110 610,426 ELECTIONS 31,746 203,857 117,467 117,467 174,897 ASSESSING 562,864 656,271 740,153 740,153 773,651 LEGAL & COURT SERVICES 305,215 398,858 410,000 410,000 430,000 TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT $ 2,741,557 $ 3,189,201 $ 3,247,775 $ 3,254,455 $ 3,470,926 PUBLIC WORKS: ADMINISTRATION $ 156,396 $ 160,761 $ 177,433 $ 177,433 $ 192,929 ENGINEERING 608,867 611,043 755,259 755,259 819,577 SUPERVISION 414,442 357,924 382,344 382,344 413,594 STREET MAINTENANCE 2,518,956 2,797,654 3,216,494 3,216,494 3,436,247 STREET LIGHTING 357,157 390,061 411,320 411,320 403,100 STREET NAME SIGNS 103,910 116,176 49,900 49,900 45,900 TRAFFIC CONTROL 116,295 126,755 129,100 129,100 131,300 BRIDGES /GUARD RAILS 26,238 22,379 9,500 9,500 10,000 RETAINING WALL MAINTENANCE 12,974 10,142 20,090 20,090 23,800 SIDEWALKS, RAMPS & PARKING LOTS 122,344 113,122 90,185 90,185 96,660 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS $ 4,437,579 $ 4,706,017 $ 5,241,625 $ 5,241,625 $ 5,573,107 PUBLIC SAFETY: POLICE PROTECTION $ 5,749,647 $ 6,262,781 $ 6,593,341 $ 6,593,341 $ 6,925,605 CIVILIAN DEFENSE 32,085 49,496 43,320 43,320 50,072 ANIMAL CONTROL 40,583 60,752 74,982 74,982 82,893 FIRE PROTECTION 3,751,107 3,582,586 3,932,476 3,932,476 4,084,328 PUBLIC HEALTH 422,201 395,678 443,641 443,641 470,893 INSPECTIONS 660,016 704,864 692,305 692,305 804,163 TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY $ 10,655,639 $ 11,056,157 $ 11,780,065 $ 11,780,065 $ 12,417,954 PARK & RECREATION: ADMINISTRATION $ 621,199 $ 617,279 $ 648,724 $ 648,724 $ 691,592 RECREATION 309,707 314,677 351,814 351,814 382,275 MAINTENANCE 1,820,249 1,947,204 2,177,191 2,177,191 2,309,463 TOTAL PARK DEPARTMENT $ 2,751,155 $ 2,879,160 $ 3,177,729 $ 3,177,729 $ 3,383,330 i i i CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 4 FUND: GENERAL I EXPENDITURE SUMMARY SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2003 2004 2005 2006 DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL PROPOSED ESTIMATED BUDGETED NON - DEPARTMENTAL EXPENSES: CONTINGENCIES $ 244,707 $ 91,307 $ 123,014 $ 123,014 $ 119,616 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 28,188 26,587 28,000 28,000 30,000 CAPITAL PLAN APPROPRIATION 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 FIRE DEPT. DEBT SERVICE 83,761 - - - - EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS 132,308 118,651 130,000 130,000 129,000 COMMISSIONS 8 SPEC. PROJECTS 189,323 164,225 226,368 226,368 206,315 TOTAL, NON-DEPARTMENTAL $ 728,287 $ 450,770 $ 557,382 $ 557,382 $ 534,931 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES $ 21,314,217 $ 22,281,305 $ 24,004,576 $ 24,011,256 $ 25,380,248 City of Edina Property Tax Levies 2003 2004 2005 2006 General Fund Levy $16,171,875 $16,489,129 $ 17,772,350 $18,560,151 City Hall Debt Service 1,026,437 1,028,837 1,058,840 1,081,536 Equipment Certificates 586,163' 604,275 162,200 159,100 Gymnasium Debt Service - - - 420,205 Park Bond Market Value Levy 721,967 686,662 674,161 599,138 Total Property Tax Levy $18,506,442 $18,808,903 $19,667,551 $ 20,820,130 General Fund Levy Increase 1.14% 1.96% 7.78% 4.43% Debt Levy Increase (Decrease) 34.30% - 0.63% - 18.30% 19.25% Total Property Tax Levy Increase 4.39% 1.63% 4.57% 5.86% i i Public Works Overview Public Works Distribution by Area Street Lighting Street Signs 0 8% 7.2% Sidewalks. Rai 1. Traffic Ctrl 2.4% Administration 3.5% Engineering 14.7% Supervision 7.4% Ketaining vvaus 0.4% Bridges 0.2% Public Works Distribution by Expenditure Central Q - - „ - -- Equipmen 9.6% Commodities 13.5% Contractual Services 14.3% Street Maint. 61.7% Salaries 48.1% CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 19 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PUBLIC WORKS I ADMINISTRATION 1240 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Public Works Administration -1240: Personal services consist of 1 &' /Z employees in this area. This department provides supervision and policy guidance over various Public Works departments. These departments are Engineering, Streets, Utilities, and Equipment Operation. The total permanent employment in the Public Works area is 60. The function of the City Engineer is also provided under Public Works Administration. Additionally, operating City liaison to other agencies such as MNDOT, Metro Council, Hennepin County, PCA, Minnesota Board of Health, Corps of Engineers, Department of Natural Resources, Nine Mile Creek and Minnehaha Creek Watershed Districts and other Cities is provided for through this account. 2005 2006 % Total Public Works Budget $5,241,625 $5,573,107 6.32% Explanation of Change: • $40,000 was added to professional services, in part for traffic studies. • $5,000 was added for public education materials for the Edina Transportation Commission. • $6,000 was added for additional cost of salt for snow and ice control. • $65,000 was added for asphalt commodities, which are used for mill and overlays of frontage roads within the City that are not included in the Municipal State Aid System. i i i i CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 20 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 1240 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2003 2004 2005 2006 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL PROPOSED ESTIMATED BUDGETED PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 113,920 $ 116,089 $ 127,694 $ 127,694 $ 132,692 6030 PENSIONS 6,250 6,420 7,061 7,061 7,961 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 8,343 8,115 8,319 8,319 8,816 6040 FLEX PLAN 6,505 4,799 10,620 10,620 11,520 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 847 750 787 787 748 135,865 136,173 154,481 154,481 161,737 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6104 CONTINUING EDUCATION 556 290 1,000 1,000 1,500 6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 320 283 500 500 500 6107 MILEAGE 3,376 3,389 3,500 3,500 3,500 6188 CELL PHONE - 42 300 300 200 4,252 4,004 5,300 5,300 5,700 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2 486 - - 1,000 CENTRAL SERVICES: 6803 GENERAL 12,953 12,493 11,592 11,592 18,660 6804 CITY HALL 3,324 7,605 6,060 6,060 5,832 16,277 20,098 17,652 17,652 24,492 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION $ 156,396 $ 160,761 $ 177,433 $ 177,433 $ 192,929 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 21 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL I PUBLIC WORKS I ENGINEERING 1 1260-1265 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Engineering -1260: Personal services consist of 7 & 1/2 employees in this area. The Engineering Department prepares plans, specifications and estimates for public construction projects. This includes street grading and surfacing, sanitary sewers, storm sewers, watermains and other structures and improvements. It supervises the construction of these projects and provides the necessary inspection to insure materials and workmanship are in accordance with project specifications. The department maintains records and files on all of the above mentioned activities and operates and maintains plan reproduction equipment. Transportation Commission —1265: The Edina City Council in December 2003 established the Transportation Commission to address traffic issues and improve the local transportation system to stay consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Vision 20/20. The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) advises the Council on matters relating to the operation of the local street system with respect to traffic volumes, congestion, and functional classification -- but not maintenance activities -- of the City. The ETC reviews and comments on plans to enhance mass transit opportunities in the City. The ETC evaluates methods for traffic calming and other speed and volume mitigation measures and recommends their implementation where appropriate. The ETC reviews the findings of the Local Traffic Task Force and offers recommendations for implementation. i i pi Ll CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 22 FUND: FUNCTION: I AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING 1260-1265 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2003 2004 2005 2006 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL PROPOSED ESTIMATED BUDGETED ENGINEERING -1260 PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 324,144 $ 361,882 $ 463,777 $ 463,777 $ 451,827 6011 OVERTIME 15,258 12,293 2,781 2,781 2,900 6030 PENSIONS 17,941 19,624 25,801 25,801 27,284 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 26,378 29,099 35,692 35,692 34,787 6040 FLEX PLAN 34,599 35,844 53,100 53,100 57,600 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 2,020 2,807 2,876 2,876 2,561 420,340 461,549 584,027 584,027 576,959 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 48,302 29,421 32,000 32,000 42,000 6104 CONTINUING EDUCATION 3,367 4,630 3,600 3,600 5,192 6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 940 1,772 1,000 1,000 1,000 6106 MEETING EXPENSE 1,650 - 550 550 550 6107 MILEAGE 297 2,865 3,300 3,300 3,400 6188 CELL PHONE 2,573 2,418 2,600 2,600 2,700 57,129 41,106 43,050 43,050 54,842 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 6,181 9,867 9,500 9,500 9,800 6548 BLUEPRINTING /CAD 466 668 2,000 2,000 1,200 6577 LUMBER & TOOLS 2,006 637 2,000 2,000 2,000 8,653 11,172 13,500 13,500 13,000 CENTRAL SERVICES: 6803 GENERAL 28,976 33,852 31,704 31,704 45,204 6804 CITY HALL 11,580 22,791 18,156 18,156 17,484 6808 EQUIPMENT OPERATION 16,584 17,489 18,072 18,072 18,936 57,140 74,132 67,932 67,932 81,624 EQUIPMENT: 6710 REPLACEMENT 65,605 23,084 46,750 46,750 48,152 TOTAL ENGINEERING $ 608,867 $ 611,043 $ 755,259 $ 755,259 $ 774,577 TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION -1265 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - - - 40,000 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES - - - - 5,000 TOTAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 45,000 TOTAL ENGINEERING $ 608,867 $ 611,043 $ 755,259 $ 755,259 $ 819,577 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 23 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: I GENERAL I PUBLIC WORKS I SUPERVISION 1 1280-1281 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Supervision -1280: Personal services consist of 2'/2 time employees. The operations of the Public Works department are overseen by the Public Works Coordinator. Some of the activities include: 1. Maintaining a computerized vehicle management system to determine the expense of vehicle maintenance; 2. the purchasing and billing of equipment and supplies; and 3. maintaining an up to date inventory of the commodities used to service the City. Additionally, the Coordinator, through this account, plans and coordinates Public Works activities, maintains cost and work records and provides the training and instruction necessary to insure the workers do their jobs most efficiently and effectively. Overhead - the major portion of this budget is the general benefits for the street department allocated from the Central Services General (1550) budget. Training -1281: This program provides for the personal services time and aids required to provide the necessary training. i i i ►.J.J rA CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE -46 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PUBLIC SAFETY POLICE PROTECTION 1400-1419 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2003 2004 2005 2006 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL PROPOSED ESTIMATED BUDGETED POLICE SERVICES -1400 PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 3,553,505 $ 3,830,556 $ 4,045,785 $ 4,045,785 $ 4,219,392 6011 OVERTIME 200,841 223,845 142,958 142,958 147,300 6030 PENSIONS 329,735 355,861 361,633 361,633 420,369 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 92,302 100,136 99,401 99,401 102,780 6040 FLEX PLAN 369,252 415,009 474,360 474,360 504,960 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 74,617 74,721 86,350 86,350 80,193 4,620,252 5,000,128 5,210,487 5,210,487 5,474,994 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 17,978 33,176 14,237 14,237 16,237 6104 CONTINUING EDUCATION 29,048 26,173 31,171 31,171 31,794 6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 2,530 2,137 2,445 2,445 2,445 6106 MEETING EXPENSE 402 445 1,000 1,000 1,000 6107 MILEAGE 2,431 207 1,100 1,100 1,100 6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 15,263 18,233 19,532 19,532 20,532 6160 DATA PROCESSING 37,049 34,423 63,345 63,345 62,301 6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS 1,766 420 1,300 1,300 1,300 6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 4,293 - - 6188 TELEPHONE 11,723 15,290 12,534 12,534 12,904 6201 LAUNDRY 531 496 538 538 538 6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 41,509 40,303 42,299 42,299 43,415 6204 TELETYPE SERVICE 3,121 2,936 4,000 4,000 3,300 6215 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 16,419 13,369 11,513 11,513 12,573 6221 RANGE RENTAL - 38,842 16,250 16,250 20,243 6230 SERVICE CONTR. - EQUIP. 59,573 64,798 82,546 82,546 84,197 303,810 313,879 239,343 295,541 303,810 COMMODITIES: 6405 BOOKS AND PAMPHLETS 70 961 2,400 2,400 1,300 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 26,648 39,592 34,147 34,147 34,830 6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 1,535 426 2,045 2,045 1,500 6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 2,206 516 1,848 1,848 1,848 6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 3,502 3,657 3,637 3,637 3,710 6514 INSPECTION EXPENSES - - 1,098 1,098 1,100 6551 AMMUNITION 9,645 10,360 9,844 9,844 11,031 6575 .PRINTING 7,547 11,740 10,000 10,000 11,000 6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 7,934 1,416 3,231 3,231 3,296 6630 GRANT EXPENDITURES - - - - - 59,087 68,668 68,250 68,250 69,615 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 47 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PUBLIC SAFETY POLICE PROTECTION 1400-1419 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Total Police Budget Reserve Program -1419: 2005 2006 % $ 6,593,341 $ 6,925,605 5.04% The reserve program is comprised of the Senior Police Reserve (7 members), Explorer Post 925 (20 members), and the Edina Police Reserve (15 members). Explorer Post 925 contributes approximately 700 hours of public services to various community events and programs. This is a result of career orientation and training provided by the Police Department. The Edina Police Reserve serves the community in excess of 4,000 hours annually. They perform work during special events and provide non - emergency service work and patrol. i i P� CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 48 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PUBLIC SAFETY I POLICE PROTECTION 1400-1419 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2003 2004 2005 2006 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL PROPOSED ESTIMATED BUDGETED CENTRAL SERVICES: 6803 GENERAL $ 161,067 $ 208,210 $ 249,984 $ 249,984 $ 245,820 6804 CITY HALL 94,104 187,028 148,860 148,860 185,940 6808 EQUIPMENT OPERATION 346,404 338,011 349,128 349,128 364,848 601,575 733,249 747,972 747,972 796,608 EQUIPMENT: 6710 REPLACEMENT 210,507 147,000 243,000 243,000 250,290 210,507 147,000 243,000 243,000 250,290 TOTAL POLICE SERVICES $ 5,730,764 $ 6,244,586 $ 6,573,519 $ 6,573,519 $ 6,905,386 RESERVE PROGRAM -1419 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES $ 11,300 $ 9,600 $ 8,400 $ 8,400 $ 8,400 6104 CONTINUING EDUCATION 1,700 4,071 4,145 4,145 4,416 6106 MEETING EXPENSE - - 1,000 1,000 1,000 6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 5,834 3,981 5,280 5,280 5,386 18,834 17,652 18,825 18,825 19,202 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 49 543 997 997 1,017 TOTAL RESERVE PROGRAM $ 18,883 $ 18,195 $ 19,822 $ 19,822 $ 20,219 TOTAL POLICE PROTECTION $ 5,749,647 $ 6,262,781 $ 6,593,341 $ 6,593,341 $ 6,925,605 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PUBLIC SAFETY CIVILIAN DEFENSE 1460 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Civilian Defense -1460: PAGE - 49 Personal services consist of '/4 the time of the police chief. This is a cumulative estimate of Police department time of the Director, Coordinator, and administrative specialists. The objective of the Civilian Defense program is to prepare the community for disasters or emergencies - natural or man -made. This is accomplished by compliance with Federal, State and County guidelines for emergency preparedness planning. Action plans are developed and practiced at the City level. This activity, coupled with 10 outdoor warning sirens, ensures the operation of government and maintenance of emergency services during disasters. 2005 2006 % Total Civilian Defense Budget $ 43,320 $ 50,072 15.59% i i s s CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 72 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: 711640 OGRAM: GENERAL PARK & RECREATION MAINTENANCE -1641 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2003 2004 2005 2006 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL PROPOSED ESTIMATED BUDGETED GENERAL MAINTENANCE -1640 PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 111,578 $ 131,026 $ 830,586 $ 830,586 $ 868,249 6011 OVERTIME 16 - 29,870 29,870 30,800 6020 PART TIME 7,298 - 200,541 200,541 206,600 6030 PENSIONS 6,347 6,766 58,673 58,673 66,339 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 9,563 9,196 81,166 81,166 84,582 6040 FLEX PLAN 13,271 13,498 117,846 117,846 127,954 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 2,369 2,267 20,939 20,939 19,990 150,442 162,753 1,339,621 1,339,621 1,404,514 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6104 CONTINUING EDUCATION 7,517 5,988 8,000 8,000 8,160 6188 TELEPHONE 1,697 1,911 2,400 2,400 2,448 10,608 9,214 7,899 10,400 10,400 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 208 120 1,236 1,236 1,261 CENTRAL SERVICES: 6803 GENERAL 32,460 32,120 29,196 29,196 43,632 6806 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING 26,676 29,381 28,680 28,680 30,504 6808 EQUIPMENT OPERATION 196,212 186,902 193,044 193,044 206,316 255,348 248,403 250,920 250,920 280,452 TOTAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE $ 415,212 $ 419,175 $ 1,602,177 $ 1,602,177 $ 1,696,835 MOWING -1641 PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 74,775 $ 100,693 $ - $ - $ - BENEFITS 16,696 22,045 - - - 91,471 122,738 - - - COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 616 3,981 1,639 1,639 1,672 TOTAL MOWING $ 92,087 $ 126,719 $ 1,639 $ 1,639 $ 1,672 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL I PARK & RECREATION I MAINTENANCE 1642-1643 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Field Maintenance -1642: PAGE - 73 All sports fields are specially prepared for scheduled games. These fields are dragged and field lined with a chalk material. A special mixture (agricultural lime) is used each spring for filling holes and regrading is done as needed during the playing season. All of the field areas are fertilized each year and the grass is treated with herbicides. The grassy playing surfaces in all of these parks are aerated, seeded and /or sodded when necessary to maintain safe ground cover. Explanation of Change: An additional $5,000 to the Fertilizer budget is needed to maintain healthy turf on the four new sand /peat multi - purpose athletic fields. This account is supplemented by a $8 field use fee from participants. In 2003, $72,013 was contributed from the activities listed below. $82,550 was collected in 2004. Activity Adult Soccer Adult Baseball Adult Softball Edina Baseball Association EGAA Flag Football Edina Youth Softball Association Edina Girls Fast Pitch Softball Edina Soccer Assoc. & Soccer Club Edina Football Association Edina Lacrosse Association Miscellaneous Field Rentals Total General Turf Care -1643: 2003 $1,915 76 7,150 7,535 2,457 2,792 616 29,856 5,912 2,416 11,288 2004 $5,400 924 7,100 16,982 2,088 4,376 1,335 32,360 5,456 2,064 4.465 $72,013 $82,550 The funds in this program provide for all city properties and general park maintenance. This includes the contracted spraying of weeds (dandelions) twice a year in areas that are in keeping with Edina's Turf Management Plan. i i T Transitway Southwest Transitway Study Launched - - - • The Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority (HCRRA) and its Study Partners are conducting a study to evaluate transit alternatives (modes and routes) for a Southwest Transitway to serve downtown Minneapolis, St. Louis Park, Hopkins, Minnetonka, and Eden Prairie. The study, called an Alternatives Analysis (AA), is intended to compare the benefits, costs and impacts of a range of tronsitway alternatives in order to select o preferred alternative. The Southwest Transitway Alternatives Analysis (AA) study is a continuation of the Southwest Rail Transit Study, 2003, and will be completed by fall of 2006. Open Houses Held in May More than 150 people attended community open houses held in mid -May in Eden Prairie, Hopkins, and Minneapolis. Congestion Comments confirmed that this is a major public issue. People are looking for ways to avoid spending time in congestion. Options People want alternatives to the automobile for daily travel, especially as they age and no longer want to drive. Timing Tail Presentation boards explaining the study purpose, goals, process, and routes under consideration were displayed. Attendees engaged in one -on -one discussions with study team staff to communicate their issues, concerns, and Noise comments regarding the study. Comments received help shape the alternatives (mode and route) considered and the measures used to evaluate them. Additional open houses and special meetings will be held throughout the study process to receive input. Please check the study website at www.southwesttransitway.org or call 612.348.9260 for meeting dates and times. Many people expressed frustration at the length of time to implement major transportation (both transit and roadway) projects. People want to ensure that the existing pedestrian /bike trails are preserved and that any transit project constructed is compatible with trail usage. Concern was expressed regarding noise from the trains, the bells and whistles, especially around station locations. Economic Southwest Transitway Newsletter U �. and future businesses and other T / {' activity centers. Parking H Volume 1 June 2005 W parking on neighborhood streets. Environment E is clean and does not impact parks S and lakes. T Transitway Southwest Transitway Study Launched - - - • The Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority (HCRRA) and its Study Partners are conducting a study to evaluate transit alternatives (modes and routes) for a Southwest Transitway to serve downtown Minneapolis, St. Louis Park, Hopkins, Minnetonka, and Eden Prairie. The study, called an Alternatives Analysis (AA), is intended to compare the benefits, costs and impacts of a range of tronsitway alternatives in order to select o preferred alternative. The Southwest Transitway Alternatives Analysis (AA) study is a continuation of the Southwest Rail Transit Study, 2003, and will be completed by fall of 2006. Open Houses Held in May More than 150 people attended community open houses held in mid -May in Eden Prairie, Hopkins, and Minneapolis. Congestion Comments confirmed that this is a major public issue. People are looking for ways to avoid spending time in congestion. Options People want alternatives to the automobile for daily travel, especially as they age and no longer want to drive. Timing Tail Presentation boards explaining the study purpose, goals, process, and routes under consideration were displayed. Attendees engaged in one -on -one discussions with study team staff to communicate their issues, concerns, and Noise comments regarding the study. Comments received help shape the alternatives (mode and route) considered and the measures used to evaluate them. Additional open houses and special meetings will be held throughout the study process to receive input. Please check the study website at www.southwesttransitway.org or call 612.348.9260 for meeting dates and times. Many people expressed frustration at the length of time to implement major transportation (both transit and roadway) projects. People want to ensure that the existing pedestrian /bike trails are preserved and that any transit project constructed is compatible with trail usage. Concern was expressed regarding noise from the trains, the bells and whistles, especially around station locations. Economic People support the idea of locating a Development transitway project to serve existing and future businesses and other activity centers. Parking Residents want to ensure that sufficient parking is provided to avoid parking on neighborhood streets. Environment People want a transitway option that is clean and does not impact parks and lakes. If you were unable to attend a community open house, but would like to comment, please contact us at: Southwest Transitway 417 North 51h St., #320 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.348.9260 (Phone) 612.348.9710 (Fax) SWcorridor@co.hennepin.nnn.us All comments received ore shared with local elected officials and become part of the study documentation. THE PROBLEM According to the U.S. Census, this region added 430,000 new residents and 290,000 new jobs between 1990 and 2000 — a 17% increase in population and 23% increase in jobs. During this some period, cities in the study area added 34,000 new residents and 37,000 new jobs. By 2030, this region will add 635,000 more people, 320,000 more households and 312,000 more jobs. By 2030, cities in the study area are expected to add another 63,000 residents and 79,000 jobs, and will account for 17% of the region's residents and 25% of the region's jobs. At the same time the region is growing, mobility is projected to decline at a faster rate than in the past due in part to increases in the amount of travel per person. Daily Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) is expected to increase faster ( +38 %) than population growth ( +28 %) over the next 25 years. The maps below illustrate the projected increase in travel times (measured during the PM peak hour) from Eden Prairie to other parts of the region. As travel times increase, mobility declines. THE CHALLENGE Southwest Transitway • • This region must accommodate projected growth while maintaining a competitive business environment and improving the region's quality of life. • Improve Mobility _ According to the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn /DOT), • Cost- Effective 3 Efficient .._. roadway expansion cannot fully address the problem of declining mobility. Plans developed by Mn /DOT and the Metropolitan Council to manage the • Protect the Environment region's transportation system include both roadway and transit improvements. A Southwest Transitway was included along with • Preserve Quality of Life improvements to area roadways (1 -494, Highways 100, 169, 62, and 212) in • Support Economic Development those regional transportation plans. Southwest Transitway Newsletter 2 As part of the study process a range of transit technologies were evaluated to determine which are appropriate for a Southwest Tronsitway. Technologies evaluated included conventiohal diesel buses, bus rapid transit (BRT), light rail transit (LRT), streetcar, heavy rail (subway), commuter rail, monorail, and personal rapid transit (PRT). Evaluation criteria included ability to accommodate projected travel demand, proven technology, compatibility with existing /planned infrastructure, and identification in the Metropolitan Council's long -range transportation plan. The result of this evaluation was the retention of conventional diesel buses, bus rapid transit (BRT), and light rail transit (LRT) as potential Southwest Transitway technologies. The transit technologies were then paired with routes to establish potential alternatives to serve the study area. The conventional diesel bus is the most commonly used transit vehicle in the world. Buses offer the flexibility of operation in mixed traffic on city streets and highways. The Enhanced Bus Alternative included in this study is an expanded system of express, limited stop, and local bus service using conventional diesel buses traveling in mixed traffic on existing roadways, in high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes, and on bus only shoulders where available. This alternative is used for comparison to the "build" alternatives (light rail transit and bus rapid transit), which require major infrastructure investments including tracks, exclusive bus lanes, and /or specialized transit stations. Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) combines the flexibility of buses with the frequency and travel time advantages of rail transit. BRT typically offers high capacity, high - frequency bus operation along an exclusive bus -only roadway (minimum of 28 feet wide) with on- line, high amenity stations. Light rail transit (LRT) is a medium to high capacity passenger rail service that can be used both for short and line -haul trips. LRT vehicles typically operate in exclusive or semi-exclusive. rights- of -way (approximately 30 feet wide) and are powered from an overhead electrification system. tie ri i:.. 7= ,... ENHANCED BUS ALTERNATIVE• .; '� '( - `� - �: Mm Route A Limited SIOD (New) i7 : I • �� �, _ ...L a:. Route B Limited Stop (New) -- ".. - y ` •� - .�+ SW Express via I -394 er_ SW Express via Uptown a Bus Stop Location [2isrs1lBa�/ J i Park d Ride Location --� ��:_. • New routes ahoAm are in �� j addibm to tuG9� 10031 bus J �}..��5 ;; r network om Poi ts. now � / � tools amesa Points. JUNE 2005 Southwest Transitway Newsletter 3 I The map below illustrates the LRT routing alternatives recommended for further study during the Southwest Rail Transit Study, 2003. These routes are referred to as "A" routes via the Kenilworth Corridor and "1", " 2", 113", or "41' depending upon their routing through St. Louis Park, Hopkins, Minnetonka, and Eden Prairie. Between 5th /Nicollet and Van White /Dunwoody, the "A" routes use either Royalston or Hennepin Avenue. LRT 1 A: From downtown Minneapolis (511, St. & Nicollet Ave.) to Highway 5 in Eden Prairie via the Kenilworth Corridor and the HCRRA property. LRT 2A: From downtown Minneapolis (51h St. & Nicollet Ave.) to Highway 5 in Eden Prairie via the Kenilworth Corridor, the HCRRA property, and 1 -494. LRT 3A: From downtown Minneapolis (51h St. & Nicollet Ave.) to Highway 5 in Eden Prairie via the Kenilworth Corridor, the HCRRA property, and new right -of -way through Opus, Golden Triangle, Eden Prairie Center Mall, and the Southwest Metro Transit Station. LRT 4A: From downtown Minneapolis (51h St. & Nicollet Ave.)' to Shady Oak Road via the Kenilworth Corridor and the HCRRA property. _ a t u: y % 17 _ an, W `e. E) S1 LCV1 46 4 LRT A_ _ l- 1 O - -_ Jam- .. ,,•+`+ %\ - (7fI1 I LRT-4 MINNrfONt� - Y• LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT "A" ALTERNATIVES J ✓ —LRT Alignment -LRT -3� �. LRT=- ►Golden AltemativeAlignment Option . ` • LRT Station LRT- # l C O LRT Park 8 Ride Station ' Va11e ;.v a >, _ �.,, �., LRT 4 terminates In Hopkins @ Shady Oak �SeaS�e r`. f r LRT 7, Y 8 3 terminate In Eden Prairie @TH5 v JUNE o egos°` - w t r` Ad n" Ine) >Centr 2005 Southwest Transitway Newsletter 4 w The map below illustrates the LRT alternatives proposed to use the Midtown Corridor and Nicollet Avenue to enter downtown Minneapolis. These routes are referred to as "C" routes via Midtown/ Nicollet and "1 ", "2 ", "311, or "4" depending upon their routing through St. Louis Park-Hopkins, Minnetonka, and Eden Prairie. Between 51h /Nicollet and Nicollet /Franklin the "CI' routes use either Nicollet Mall (two -way) or Marquette /2nd Avenues (one -way pair). LRT 1 C: From downtown Minneapolis (51h St. & Nicollet Ave.)' to Highway 5 in Eden Prairie via Nicollet Mall or Marquette /2nd Ave., Nicollet Ave. (tunnel), the Midtown Corridor, and the HCRRA property. LRT 2C: From downtown Minneapolis (5thSt.& Nicollet Ave.) to Highway 5 in Eden Prairie via Nicollet Mall or Marquette /2nd Ave., Nicollet Ave. (tunnel), the Midtown Corridor, the HCRRA property, and 1 -494. LRT 3C: From downtown Minneapolis (51h St. & Nicollet Ave.) to Highway 5 in Eden Prairie via Nicollet Mall or Marquette /2nd Ave., Nicollet Ave. (tunnel), the Midtown Corridor, the HCRRA property, and new right -of -way through Opus, Golden Triangle, to Eden Prairie Center Mall, and the Southwest Metro Transit Station. LRT 4C: From downtown Minneapolis (5th St. & Nicollet Ave.) to Shady Oak Road via Nicollet Mall or Marquette /2nd Ave., Nicollet Ave. (tunnel), the Midtown Corridor, and the HCRRA property. r/ 1 y. 7ATA b dT LOUIS ' -I _LRfi -Gt. -� f 4 �I .- II l_I 1) ❑ ;_, � !�13CZLr1'}ni;. ../ I - t owtf b ! RAW - - MINNFAPOLm - .. S _ . 4 .r: T-4 Lam, ! �• i - I MIMNETONMA -T bus ' LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT 62. �', `1. "C" ALTERNATIVES . L. Y ,..EOINA ' LRT Alignment 1 7 ^' Alternative Alignment Option l� RT 3-%+ LRT- -► Go' ;,Tggngle' { j --- LRT Tunnel •� i i' • LRT Station LRT- 0 _I. ❑ O LRT Park & Ride Station 'm'' *•east° t i ` f LRT 4 terminates In Hopkins @ Shady Oak LRT 1, 2 & 3 terminate In Eden Prairie @THS . , ® JUNE MILEB PoE eCener, o® 2005 Southwest Tronsitwoy Newsletter 5 The map below illustrates the two bus rapid transit (BRT) alternatives under consideration. BRT 1: From downtown Minneapolis (51h St. & Nicollet Ave.) to Highway 5 via Hennepin Avenue (reverse bus lane), the Kenilworth Corridor, and the HCRRA property. Access to /from the Southwest Metro Transit Station would be provided via shoulder bus lanes. BRT 2: From downtown Minneapolis to Highway 5 in Eden Prairie via Hennepin Avenue (reverse bus lane), the Kenilworth Corridor, the HCRRA property, Highway 169 (existing shoulder bus lanes), Bren Road (new bus -only lane) to Opus (new bus -only road) through City West and the Golden Triangle (new bus -only road), Prairie Center Drive (new bus -only lane), Eden Prairie Center Mall, Technology Drive (new bus -only lane), SW Metro Transit Station, and to Highway 5 (shoulder bus lane). Va ite/Dunwo WAYZATA �..� � ������iKC✓�� I'>" � �'r: __ . <rt.a.uca +c,���' -�.y ,i� — � 1-'ti MMNROMIU - � MOPIIIMS • 0 ktns MWMETON A it )n lK�1/ - -I R BRT1 ,_ rs 4 � —C E Southwest'ilAetro;1� ••- . PNAIWE MINNEEPOIIE {h. t .. M., .. 1- I BUS RAPID TRANSIT eolM• ' • ALTERNATIVES .! New Exclusive Busway Id rn n e —` '. - „� - 9; ary - New Bus Only Lane 1 . G Existing Bus Shoulder Lanes - -- Alternative Alignment Option ;' �`I! • BRT Station O BRT Park 8 Ride Station JUNE MUS r e Gents ! F t o® 2005 For more information regarding the enhanced bus, light rail transit, and bus rapid transit alternatives, please visit the Southwest Transitway Alternatives Analysis (AA) study website at www.southwesttransitway.org or call 612.348.9260. Southwest Transitway Newsletter 6 An Alternatives Analysis (AA) study is a federally required comprehensive transportation planning process designed to identify and address the mobility needs of the study area. The goal of an Alternatives Analysis (AA) study is to compare the benefits, costs and impacts of a range of transit alternatives in order to select a preferred alternative. Collaborative decision - making and proactive public involvement are important components of an Alternatives Analysis (AA) study. .. I � 7 .3 �x c� k h� lWherp JkreWein the Study Process... ✓ identify area travel needs & mobility issues ✓ establish goals and objectives ✓ develop a broad range of transit (mode and route) alternatives ANhpt iArethe "Next Steps... • evaluate the range of transit alternatives (ridership forecasts, cost estimates, and identification of potential environmental and community benefits /impacts) • present evaluation results at community open houses and other special meetings to receive feedback • select a preferred alternative Public involvement is the cornerstone of the Southwest Tronsitway Alternatives Analysis (AA) study. During the study, major decisions will be made that affect the future of the study area and the region. That's why you need to get involved and stay involved. Your input will help the study team develop the transitway alternatives (mode and route), the measures used to evaluate them, and the selection of a preferred alternative. To encourage your involvement, we are providing numerous ways for you to get and stay engaged. In addition to hosting community open houses, we will maintain a website containing study information, distribute periodic newsletters via email or U.S. mail, and our study team staff are available for special meetings with civic and neighborhood groups during the study process. Study materials and meeting notices will be available either by visiting our website at www.southwesttransitway.org or calling 612.348.9260. Southwest Tronsitway Newsletter 7 The Southwest Policy Advisory Committee (SW PAC) is composed of elected officials from Hennepin County, the five directly affected cities (Eden Prairie, Minnetonka, St. Louis . Park, Hopkins, and Minneapolis), Edina, the Metropolitan Council, Metro Transit, Southwest Metro Transit, the Three Rivers Park District, the Midtown Community Works Partnership, and local chambers of commerce. Southwest Transitway 417 North 5Th St., #320 Minneapolis, MN 55401 with overseeing the process for evaluating the s and selecting the preferred alternative for a The Southwest PAC meets at major milestone points during the Southwest Transitway Alternatives Analysis (AA) Study to review the consultant's work, to provide policy direction to the consultant and the Southwest Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), and to share information . regarding community issues /concerns. To learn more about how LRT (one of the modes being considered) operates and to view adjacent development, the Southwest PAC recently toured the Hiawatha LRT line. J, 1-0- z CIO \ DATE: Monday, August 15, 2005 TO: Edina City Council Members.:'. g Scott Housh, Alice Hulbert, Ann Swenson, Linda Masica FROM: Concerned taxpaying parents in Edina Community RE: THE NEED OF BOARDED ICE RINKS EDINA FOR EHA CHILDREN TO USE (Where there'are existing warming houses) To Whom it May Concern at City Hall: • We are families. in Edina, who have children that play hockey through the Edina Hockey Association program, we are 1,000 families strong. • There are over 1200 Edina boys & girls that play hockey through the EHA that are in need places to skate throughout the Nov. through March hockey season. • Currently, due to the shortage of indoor and outdoor ice rinks in Edina, parents are forced to drive to Parade Stadium in Mpls., and Mariucci & Ridder Arenas at the U of M for ice time for kids as young as Is' graders. • We are in support of the unanimous recommendation of the Edina Park Board to utilize Todd Park as an additional needed outdoor boarded hockey rink. Currently .Todd Park neighbors have voiced strong opposition to having boards installed there. • Any Edina parks with existing warming houses that tax payers have paid for should have boarded hockey rinks for the use of tax paying citizens in Edina. organized and unorganized sports. • City Council Members to contact if you can't attend the meeting: Scott Housh (763) 302 -7174 Alice Hulbert (952) 942 -5615 Linda Masica (952).942 -6770 Ann Swenson (952) 927 -7524 Please join us & make your support known at the City Council Meeting at 7PM On Tuesday, Aug. 16, 2005 Location - Edina City Hall Bring your children wearing their Edina Hornet Jerseys! Abbie E. Thiss 4518 Drexel Avenue, Edina, MN 55424 952- 929 -4628 August 18, 2005 abbiethiss @mn.rr.com To: Edina Police Department or Edina City Hall From: Edina resident of 20 + years, Country Club District, Abbie Thiss I request that the person or persons who delivered the unwelcomed and unsolicited political correspondence be required by city or police officials to stop and desist sending this flawed information to County Club neighbors. If the persons of the attached had had the honesty or courtesy to include their name, I would have contacted them directly but as there are 550 homes is Country Club, this information is beyond my grasp but not yours. In my opinion, the author of this unsolicited flyer, makes enormous-errors by assuming that everyone in their geographic area agrees with their outrageous opinions. Please respond and advise. Thank you for all you do to make this one of the best cities in America in which to live. Best regards, 7 September 2, 2005 a Honorable Mayor Hovlilvnd, elected and respected City Council members, As a taxpaying citizen of twenty -some years in our wonderful city, I thank you once again for the magnificent job you do running the City of Edina. The city in its infinite wisdom has set aside lime at the end each City Council Meeting to allow citizens to express their concerns, which I plan to do at the next City Council meeting. Recently, someone delivered a colorful flyer to our home with grossly inaccurate information, which was unsigned although they did include all of your phone numbers and names. If this person (male or female) had the courtesy and honesty to include his or her name, I would not be speaking here tonight. Personally, I would prefer to have this conversation with them directly but they have chosen to keep their names shrouded in secrecy for some obscure reason. Unfortunately, for all of you and those present, I am forced to go on public record as a feeble attempt to identify this person so that we can have private conversation about my concerns. My concerns are not with you, our honorable elected officials, but this spineless resident who persists in sending out this mindless drivel with reckless abandon. This is the second such epistle we have received in the last in the last few months. Both have resulted in increased expenses to Edina residents or have had expenses allocated to their child's favorite sport. Apparently this person thinks it is a travesty to have their child have the rare and unique opportunity to have a hockey practice at the University of Minnesota Mariucci Area. On another topic, there are at least two neighbors in the Country Club area who are voyeurs. They chose to spend their spare time videotaping neighbors, friends and family members as they drive down our streets. Although this is allowed in America as a "freedom of speech" issue, I publicly ask them to cease and desist as a courtesy to their neighbors and friends and in the goal of neighborhood harmony. Respectfully submitted, Abbie Thins 4518 Drexel Averse Edina, MN 55424 M. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 273 Regular Meeting, August 22, 2005 Room 349, Edina Community Center AGENDA Determination of Quorum and Call to Order Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting of June 9, 2005 Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting of June 23, 2005 Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting of July 6, 2005 Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting of July 7, 2005 Approval of Minutes of Meeting of July 11,2005 Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting of July 21, 2005 Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting of August 4, 2005 Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting of August 4, 2005 HEARINGS OF INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS, AND PRESENTATION OF PETITIONS FROM THE PUBLIC REGARDING ITEMS BEFORE THE BOARD FOR ACTION OR ON ANY OTHER ISSUE (*SEE ATTACHED DETAIL.) PRESENTATION ➢ Edina Education Fund Endowment Campaign `— Susan Lee, Education Fund Board; and Idith Almog, Endowment Fund Steering ,Committee REPORT ➢ CBOC — Peyton Robb, Board Member ➢ Legislative Funding — Jay Willemssen, Director of Business Services ACTION 63 Personnel Recommendations 64 Expenditures Payable on August 22, 2005 appended 65 Board of Education Agenda, 2005 -2006 66 Board of Education Committee Appointments, 2005 -2006 67 Board of Education December Meeting Dates - Truth in Taxation Hearing 68 Notice of Annual School Board Election 69 Contract with Hazard, Young, Attea and Associates, Ltd. 70 Student Teaching Agreement with University of Wisconsin— LaCrosse 71 Student Teaching Agreement with St. Thomas University 72 Construction Bond Change Orders 97 -106 107 108 -109 110 -112 113 114 -116 117 -120 121 -123 124 -125 126 73 Purchase of Trash Liners 127 74 Purchase of Paper Towels 128 75 Purchase of Toilet Tissue 129 rONRPNT 76 Community Education Services Personnel Recommendations 130 77 Gift from Kurt Hansen 131 78 Gift from Anonymous Donor 132 79 Gift from Anonymous Donor 133 80 Gift from Anonymous Donor 134 DISCUSSION 81 Edina Education Fund Endowment Campaign 135 -136 82 Superintendent's Objectives for 2005 -2006 137 INFORMATION 83 Expenditures Payable on July 25, 2005, appended 138 84 Expenditures Payable on August 8, 2005, appended 139 85 Bond Fund Expenditures Payable on July 21, 2005 140 -142 86 Bond Fund Expenditures Payable on August 4, 2005 143 -144 87 Bond Fund Expenditures Payable on August 18, 2005 145 -148 88 Edina High School Fashion Design Tour to New York City 149 -150 89 Recognition of Staff 151 Adjournment *Persons who wish to address the Board are requested to complete and submit an appropriate form to the Board Secretary prior to the designated hearing time. ' When recognized, each individual shall identify himself /herself and the group represented, if any. He /She shall then state the reason for addressing the Board and shall be limited in time at the discretion of the Board Chair. Individual employees of the School District or representatives of employee organizations shall have utilized administrative procedures before making a request to address the Board. Date: Summer 2005 To: Chief Marty Scheerer From: Berit Peterson, Health Services Coordinator 952- 848 -4890 berpeterson(cDedina.k I2.mn.us Subject: Edina Schools Health Services Enclosed in a copy to the 2004 -05 Health Services Annual Report. Please note pages 21 -24 which address 911 calls and student injuries. Also, note page 29 which outlines the district CPR plan. The Fire Department is acknowledged on page 27. We called 911, 16 times again this school year and there were 12 transports. Again, calls were for staff 5 of the 16 times. I continue to be impressed with the response time and actions of the qualified staff at the Edina Fire Department. When we have had questions regarding responses, you have responded quickly and thoroughly. Please'let me know if any of the EMS staff have comments or questions regarding appropriateness of the 911 calls, treatment before EMS arrival, or cooperation after arrival. I would appreciate any opportunity to talk with you on the phone or meet with you. It is important for the EMS staff to know that there is Health Service staff in all the schools when school is in session. Five of the elementary schools have a Health Service Associate who is first aid and CPR trained. They work with nurses who are not on site. Cornelia has a full time Licensed School Nurse. The secondary schools have a Licensed School Nurse and a Health Service Associate. The Licensed School Nurse is an RN with a bachelor's degree and a Public Health Nurse Certificate. The nurse at Valley Middle School and I are also First Responders. Keep us in mind as you plan for potential community disasters. Thanks for your continued quality service and collaboration to serve Edina students. A report was also sent to Dr. Ho. DATE: August 19, 2005 ,MEMORANDUM CITY OF EDINA TO: Edina City Council C: Gordon Hughes, John Keprios, Wayne Houle FROM: Steve Lillehaug SUBJECT: Federal STP & TIPEDD Funding Application - Valley View Road/TH 169 Interchange Attached you will find the first two pages of the submittals that were submitted to the Metropolitan Council for potential federal funding. Please contact me if you would like a complete copy of these submittals. Thanks August 17, 2005 Mr. Kevin Roggenbuck Transportation Coordinator Transportation Advisory Board Mears Park Centre 230 East Fifth Street Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 City of Edina RE: Valley View Road/TH 169 Interchange Reconstruction Project Surface Transportation Program Funding Submittal Dear Mr. Roggenbuck: The City of Edina respectfully submits this application for Federal Surface Transportation Program (STP) funding for the Valley View Road/TH 169 interchange reconstruction project. The proposed project includes the reconstruction of the Valley View Road/TH 169 interchange as well as the reconstruction of the intersections on both sides of the interchange. The proposed project replaces all four of the conventional intersections with roundabout intersections, and consolidates the two easterly intersections into one roundabout. It also includes the conversion of the sidewalk along the south side of Valley View Road into a multi -use trail. Additionally, we request consideration for right -of -way and for four adjacent trail projects that would be integrated with the interchange project as part of the Transportation Investment Planned Economic Development Districts ( TIPEDD) bonus allocation process. We believe this is an excellent candidate for STP and TIPEDD funding and look forward to its inclusion in the program. Sincerely, Steven Lillehaug, P.E., P.T.O.E. Assistant City Engineer /Traffic Engineer City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 Federal STP Fundine A ISTRUCTIONS: Complete and return to Kevin Roggenbuck, Transportation Office Use Only Coordinator, Transportation. Advisory hoard, Mears Park Centre, 230 E. Fifth Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101. (651) 602 -1728. Applications must be received by 5:00 PM or postmarked on July 29, 2005. *Be sure to complete and attach the Project Information form. 1. APPLICANT: City of Edina 2. JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY (IF DIFFERENT): 3. MAILING ADDRESS: 4801 West 50th Street CITY: Edina STATE: MN ZIP CODE: 55424 4. COUNTY: Hennepin 5. CONTACT PERSON: Steve Lillehaug, P.E., TITLE: Assistant City PHONE NO.: P.T.O.E. ' Engineer/Traffic Engineer (952) 826 -0445 CONTACT E -MAIL ADDRESS: sillehaug@ci.edina.mn.us 6. PROJECT NAME: Valley View Road/TH 169 Interchange Reconstruction Project 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed project implements significant mobility improvements on 1/4 -mile segment of Valley View Road at the Valley View Road/Trunk Highway (TH) 169 interchange. Improvements extend from about 175 feet west of the Valley View Road/Washington Avenue intersection to the Valley View Road/TH 169 East Frontage Road (McCauley Trail) intersection. The proposed project reconstructs all four of the conventional intersections, replaces them with roundabout intersections, and consolidates the two easterly intersections into one roundabout. It also includes the conversion of sidewalk into multi -use trail along the south side of Valley View Road. 8. TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENT PLANNED ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS (TIPEDD) Check here if project is being submitted as part of a TIPEDD District. If it is, the applicant must also submit the TIPEDD application form (found on p. 10) and list this project on that form. Refer to Attachment G for submittal. 9. STP PROJECT CATEGORY - Check only one project grouping in which you wish your project to be scored. °A" Minor Arterials: X Reliever ❑ Expander ❑Principal Arterial ❑ Connector ❑ Augmenter ❑ BikewayMalkway I! } PR ° J 0�1' MR. 1� �� 10. Are you applying or have you applied for funds from another source(s) to implement this project? No _X_ 11. FEDERAL AMOUNT: $4,800,000 14. MATCH % OF PROJECT TOTAL: 20 percent 12. MATCH AMOUNT: $1,200,000 15. SOURCE OF MATCH FUNDS: Cities of Edina and Eden Prairie 13. PROJECT TOTAL: $6,000,000 16. REQUESTED PROGRAM YEAR: 2009 17. SIGNATURE: 18. TITLE: Assistant City Engineer/Traffic Engineer Darlene Wallin From: Gordon Hughes Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 10:48 AM To: Darlene Wallin Subject: FW: Congratulations ... For packet. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: David J. Byron (mailto:DByron @riderlaw.com) Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 2:14 PM To: Wayne Houle Cc: Gordon Hughes Subject: Congratulations ... ... on the fine 70th Street /Arneson Park project. It looks great. The sidewalks west of the park entrance provide nice separation from the busy street, and, in my opinion greatly enhance the street appeal of the homes. Its nice to have the comfort of knowing that staff oversight consistently insures "better than expected" outcomes. DJB. David J. Byron, Esq. Rider Bennett, LLP 33 South Sixth Street Suite 4900 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Telephone: (612) 340 -7911 Fax: (612) 340 -7900 E -Mail: djbyron @riderlaw.com ATTENTION: This message and any attachments are intended only for the named recipient(s), and may contain information that is confidential, privileged, attorney work product, or exempt or protected from disclosure under applicable laws and rules. If you are not the intended recipient(s), you are notified that the dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you receive this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please notify the sender at either the email address or the telephone number included herein and delete this message and any of its attachments from your computer and /or network. Receipt by anyone other than the named recipient(s) is not a waiver of any attorney - client, work product, or other applicable privilege, protection, or doctrine. Thank you. This message and any attachments are covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.0 SS 2510 -2521. DATE: August 19, 2005 MEMORANDUM CITY OF EDINA TO: Edina City Council C: Gordon Hughes, John Keprios, Steve Lillehaug FROM: Wayne Houle — SUBJECT: Federal STP & TE Funding Application for: Edina CP Rail Bicycle / Pedestrian Trail Attached you will find the first two pages of the submittals that were submitted to the Metropolitan Council for potential federal funding. Please contact me if you would like a complete copy of these submittals. Thanks Federal Transportation Enhancement Fund ADDUcation INSTRUCTIONS: Complete and return to. Kevin Roggenbuck, Transportation Coordinator, Transportation Office Use onh Advisory Board, Mears Park Centre, 230 E. Fifth Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101. (651) 602 -1728. Applications must be received by 5:00 PM or postmarked on July 29, 2005. *Be sure to�pcomplete and attach the Project Information form. �.� �. _ �J;ps3y4'Ta -d '•'2��.- �"' 34P�Qtrli/� !.���+u K " =k+� �o3'{FC�� +s..•- iirl�.?'Y' '� �raY'ISrf� �}• i>��t "P� �.i � �f C +Y�sa.wi7� 1M1'v� NE ' INFeORMAF1O1��i �� �ggy.�i F I:'hs.- �`'.•�+S°" 7./+r��.+'.u,.t.M1F i+.iC 'c..x_^`.iV.TAa+ .5� 1. APPLICANT City of Edina 2. JURISDUCTIONAL AGENCY (IF DIFFERENT) 3. MAILING ADDRESS 4801 West 50th Street CITY Edina STATE MN ZIP CODE55424 4. COUNTY Hennepin 5. CONTACT PERSON TITLE Director of Public PHONE NO. Wayne Houle Works /City Engineer (952) 826 -0443 CONTACT E -MAIL ADDRESS: whoule@ci.edina.mn.us SKw^'hY�e:3%•, S �:i!fa.?'•GTAJ'igfi7@a 'y+Y 'n `k. C°:yC'"SG • �, .¢x.`v^ J .�n r4t' G 1, YT.e ' 'r �Y._,�iOJECTINFORATIO •�.. G �� �t��'- 5✓I'+�`.L9. �Y �. Funs. �'b'a�:� � �:5�'6;.^..A. .v2; W..s. ..:1,Gtnnsd' ? lie 6. PROJECT NAME Edina CP Rail Bicycle /Pedestrian Trail 7. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION (Include location, facility name, type of improvement, etc... A more complete description must be submitted separately as described in Specific Requirement #3 on p. 5) Construct a bicycle /pedestrian trail adjacent to the existing Canadian Pacific Railroad in the City of Edina from West 78th Street to West 44th Street. 8. TE PROJECT CATEGORY - Check only one project grouping in which you wish your project to be considered (see p. 85). ❑ Scenic /Environmental X❑ Bicycle /Pedestrian ❑ Historic/Archaeological 9. TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENT PLANNED ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS (TIPEDD) ❑ Check here if project is being submitted as part of a TIPED District. If it is, the applicant must also submit the TIPEDD application form (found on p. 10) and list this project on that form. 30 a ' FUNDING?- �r�,�f�, �wrw����� �mlilPROJECT{ �- �tr,':, ���. : .r.,.�;;,'..�,,•:��.. 10. Are you applying or have you applied for funds from another source(s) to implement this project? Yes X No If yes, please identify the source(s): Federal Surface Trans ortation Program Funding 11. FEDERAL AMOUNT $ 14. SOURCE OF MATCH FUNDS 11 00Q , 000 Federal STP Funds, City of Edina, MunicipalSA 12. MATCH AMOUNT $ 15. MATCH % OF PROJECT TOTAL 15.9% 5,304,000 13. PROJECT TOTAL $ 16. REQUESTED PROGRAM YR (CIRCLE ONE 2009 6,304,900 17. SIGNATURE 4ev 18. TITLE 1 �444z�a� Director of Public Works/City Engineer August 18, 2005 Mr. Kevin Roggenbuck Transportation Coordinator Transportation Advisory Board Mears Park Centre 230 East Fifth Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 RE: Federal TE Funding Application for: Edina CP Rail Bicycle / Pedestrian Trail Dear Mr. Roggenbuck: City of Edina am pleased to submit an application for the "Edina CP Rail Bicycle / Pedestrian Trail" in the TE Bicycle / Pedestrian Category. This project, first identified in the Hennepin County Bicycle Transportation Plan, and in the Edina Transportation Plan, has support of the Edina City Council as indicated in the attached application. This proposed project consists of constructing a barrier free off -road bicycle / pedestrian trail along the existing Canadian Pacific (CP) Railroad that transverses Edina from north to south parallel to MNDOT's Trunk Highway 100. The proposed trail will run approximately 4.05 miles, from West 7e Street to West 44th Street. The trail will provide connections to the east - west Interlachen Trail project that provides a link to the SW LRT Trail and beyond, and will connect towards the East Bush Lake Road Walkway / Bikeway in Bloomington. The estimated project cost is $6,304,900. The City is requesting $1,000,000 in federal funds. The remaining costs of the project will be funded with local City and Municipal State Aid funds and also potential Federal STP Funds. I would like to thank the Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) along with the Technical Advisory Board of the TAB for taking the time to review this submittal. If you have any questions or need additional information please contact me at 952 - 826 -0443 or at whouleO- ci.edina.mn.us. Sincerely, Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer C: Edina City Council City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET TTY 952- 826 -0379 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com GAEnaineerina \Improvements \S097 CP Rail Trail\ADMIN\ADDlicaUon - TE Fundina \081805 TE met council submittal Itr.doc Federal STP Funding Application INSTRUCTIONS: Complete and return to Kevin Roggenbuck, Transportation Coordinator, Transportation' office use or, Advisory Board, Mears Park Centre, 230 E. Fifth Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101. (651) 602 -1728. Applications must be received by 5:00 PM or postmarked on July 29, 2005. *Be sure to complete and attach the Project Information form. I. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. APPLICANT City of Edina 2. JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY (IF DIFFERENT) 3. MAILING ADDRESS 4801 West 50th Street CITY Edina STATEMN ZIP CODE 55424 4. COUNTY Henne in 5. CONTACT PERSON Wayne Houle TITLE Director of Public Wor City Eng-Inapr HONE NO. ) CONTACT E -MAIL ADDRESS: whoule@ci.edina.mn.us '_ : • 11. PROJECTINFORMAMON 6. PROJECT NAME Edina CP Rail Bicycle /Pedestrian Trail 7. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION (Include location, road name, type of improvement, etc... A more complete description must be submitted separately as described in Specific Requirement #3 on p. 5) Construct a bicycle /pedestrian trail adjacent to the existing Canadian Pacific Railroad in the City of Edina from West 78th Street to West 44th Street. 8. TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENT PLANNED ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS ( TIPEDD) ❑ Check here if project is being submitted as part of a TIPED District. If it is, the applicant must also submit the TIPEDD application form (found on p. 10) and list this project on that form. 9. STP PROJECT CATEGORY - Check only one project grouping in which you wish your project to be scored. "A" Minor Arterials: ❑ Reliever ❑ Expander ❑ Non -Fwy. Principal Arterial ❑ Connector ❑ Augmenter ® BikewayMalkway 111, PROJECT FUNDING 10. Are you applying or have you applied for funds from another source(s) to implement this project? Yes y No If yes, please identify the source(s): Federal Transportation Enhancement Fund 11. FEDERAL AMOUNT $ 5,042,900 14. MATCH % OF PROJECT TOTAL 80% 12. MATCH AMOUNT $ 1, 261, 00 15. SOURCE OF MATCH FUNDSCity & Municipal State Ai 13. PROJECT TOTAL $ 6 304.900 16. REQUESTED PROGRAM YEAR (CIRCLE) 2009 2010 17. SIGNATUU/ / //L �_� 18. TITLE Director of Public Works /City Engineer City of Edina August 18, 2005 Mr. Kevin Roggenbuck Transportation Coordinator Transportation Advisory Board Mears Park Centre 230 East Fifth Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 RE: Federal STP Funding Application for: Edina CP Rail Bicycle / Pedestrian Trail Dear Mr. Roggenbuck: am pleased to submit an application for the "Edina CP Rail Bicycle / Pedestrian Trail" in the STP Bikeway / Walkway Category. This project, first identified in the Hennepin County Bicycle Transportation Plan, and in the Edina Transportation Plan, has support of the Edina City Council as indicated in the attached application. This proposed project consists of constructing a barrier free off -road bicycle / pedestrian trail along the existing Canadian Pacific (CP) Railroad that transverses Edina from north to south parallel to MNDOT's Trunk Highway 100. The proposed trail will run approximately 4.05 miles, from West 78th Street to West 44th Street. The trail will provide connections to the east - west Interlachen Trail project that provides a link to the SW LRT Trail and beyond, and will connect towards the East Bush Lake Road Walkway / Bikeway in Bloomington. The estimated project cost is $6,304,900. The City is requesting $5,042,900 in federal funds (80 %). The remaining .costs of the project will be funded with local City and Municipal State Aid funds. I would like to thank the Transportation Advisory Advisory Board of the TAB for taking the time to questions or need additional information please whoule(cci.edina.mn.us. Sincerely, ay;�o,D Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer C: Edina City Council Board (TAB) along with the Technical review this submittal. If you have any contact me at 952 - 826 -0443 or at City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 •7 FAX 952- 826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET TTY 952 - 826 -0379 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com G:\Enoineedno \Imar0vements \S097 CP Rail TraIRADMIMAoolication - STP Fundino \081805 STP met council submittal Itr.doc r/ A P P R O V E D (Corrected) MINUTES OF THE ,� Edina Transportation Commission o e A Thursday, June16, 2005 Cn o Edina City Hall • ; �y 4801 West 50th Street r" Jose Community Room MEMBERS PRESENT: Fred Richards, Marie Thorpe, Jean White, Warren Plante, Joni Kelly Bennett, Les Wanninger, Dean Dovolis MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: Steve Lillehaug, Sharon Allison 1. Call to Order Chair Richards called the meeting to order. U. New Business a. In- street Pedestrian Crossing Sign Policy Lillehaug said there have been numerous requests made for in- street pedestrian crossing signs like the ones being used at 50th & France. He developed a draft policy, incorporating both federal and state guidelines for the ETC's consideration and recommendation for the City to use as a guide to determine where and when they are placed. Lillehaug said there are approximately 50 locations where the signs could be used. The City currently owns 10 signs and the purchase price is $200 /ea. Using 10 signs on a rotational basis in lieu of installing signs at all locations will help avoid overuse of the sign, which leads to less effectiveness. Lillehaug proposed putting the signs in key locations on a rotational schedule. Locations would be determined based on pedestrian volume, next to schools, parks, etc. as stated in the draft policy. After discussion, the ETC recommended revising the policy to include using the signs on a rotational basis, including using the signs during the winter also. b. Transportation Commission Membership — (Student Membership) Lillehaug said the Council has discussed adding a student to the ETC and the current ordinance does allow for this; however, a student membership is in lieu of a regular membership, which is currently full with the exception of a Planning Commissioner. The ETC agreed that the student would have the same voting rights as other members. Richards made a motion to request that the Council increase the ETC's membership to 9 to include a student and to appoint a student, and a Planning Commission member to fill the vacant membership. Motion was seconded by Dovolis. Motion carried. 1 111. Old Business a. Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan (NTMP): Score and Rank West 70th Street Using the NTMP ranking process, Lillehaug reported that West 70th Street is ranked second to the high school area. Richards said he thought West 70th Street would be addressed in the Southdale study but this does not appear to be the case. Bennett noted that the consultant's report did mention that current land use on West 70th Street is inconsistent with development. Being keenly aware of the issues, three different approaches were suggested by the Commission to begin addressing them: i. Let the neighborhood suggest what they would like to see done; ii. The City should identify some solutions before involving the neighborhood; iii.Give the neighborhood some solutions and cost analysis and allow them to respond. Lillehaug said staff is currently looking at the warrants for a new traffic signal at Wooddale and West Shore Drive. The CIP includes this project, if a traffic signal is warranted. Lillehaug said ideally West 70th Street should be four lanes or a modified three -lane road based on traffic volumes. In the meantime, he suggested that police enforcement could be stepped up to deal with speeding, but Richards said the problem is mainly congestion. Richards said the ETC should become the petitioners for West 701h Street. Bennett made a motion to hold a public meeting that would include residents east and west of Hwy. 100 and up to France Avenue. Dovolis amended the motion to include identifying some solutions for residents and inviting them to suggest other solutions. This motion was not seconded or voted on. During discussion about how to handle West 70th Street and other areas that are already scored and ranked, Thorpe noted that the ETC had already selected the areas to focus on and they are becoming side - tracked again by including yet another area. It was noted that NE Edina was selected as priority #1, but the Council does not have funding to initiate a traffic study. The question was raised about whether or not they should move on to an area that would fit into staffs schedule and where funding is not such an issue. Dovolis said the Commission would languish, if according to Council, funds were not available for the projects they've identified as priorities. He said even if there isn't a perfect solution, the ETC should continue forward and get the residents involved so that they can help to motivate Council to provide funding. Thorpe made a motion to continue working on NE Edina. This motion was not seconded or voted on. Dovolis estimated that the NE Edina study cannot be done for at least the next six months and the high school area is at least three months away, therefore, he sees no reason why they cannot begin working on West 70th. He said they should identify three possible solutions, present them to the public for their input and then have staff determine what can be done. Lillehaug said he would like to meet with City Manager Hughes and City Engineer Houle to discuss the shift in priority and his preference would be to identify the problems and possible solutions before holding a public meeting. Wanninger said they should do a formal report to the Council outlining the traffic studies that have been done and the issues discovered and let the Council decide. He said West 70th is clearly overburden with traffic and the ETC was appointed by Council to deal with these issues. Wanninger made a motion to write a formal report to the Council outlining issues and recommended solutions. Dovolis made a motion for staff to prepare a schedule and resources for the three top ranked areas and a report to Council outlining what has been done to date and things still to be done. The report is to be done within the next 30 days for the Commissioners review. Wanninger's and Dovolis' motions were combined. Seconded by White. Motion carried. IV. Handouts a. Correspondence *Dan Atkins E -mail regarding the High School area. The ETC is aware of the issues in this area and is working to address them. •Eric Isakson E -mail regarding State Fair parking at Southdale (from Commissioner White) — The closest State Fair parking for Edina' residents is Eden Prairie and the Mall of America for 2005 State Fair. Commissioner White said planning would begin fairly soon for the 2006 State Fair and she would like to see about parking at Southdale. Richards said it is his understanding that the businesses at Southdale did not want State Fair parking there. V. Approval of Minutes Wanninger moved to approve the minutes of May 19, 2005. Seconded by Plante: Meeting adjourned. The next meeting is scheduled for July 21St, 6:00 -8:00 p.m., in the Community Room, City Hall. 3 • The Minnesota Land Trust invites you to be our guest at the Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge Visitor Center on Saturday, October 1, 2005 3:00 to 5:00 p.m. to celebrate the contributions made by you and our many other landowners and volunteers in helping us protect and preserve Minnesota's natural beauty and heritage. The beautiful Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge in Bloomington, Minnesota will be the backdrop for this year's celebration and will feature an exciting demonstration of live raptors from the University of Minnesota Raptor Center. We will also present the Volunteer of the Year award to JOHN PECK, our long- standing volunteer land protection specialist. Please join us in extending our gratitude to John for his outstanding work in helping many of you protect your own treasured landscape. Feel free to come early and hike the Hillside Trail, a half -mile loop trail just outside the Visitor Center meandering through prairie, hillside forest, and wetlands of the Minnesota River Valley. A selection of hors d'oeuvres and beverages will be served. Please RSVP to Kristin at 651- 647 -9590 or kabraham @mnland.org Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge VisitmCenter 3815 American Blvd. East • 'Bloomington, Minnesota (952) 854 -5900 From I -494, exit on 34th Ave. and d ive'south.' Turn leff`on American Boulevard East and drive r .:. 1/4 mile to the entrance on the right. MT L - .. �F `; i �i Mss +t•�— r -) �, ,� . f �l - .+( 3�. -'f k 4 E Y l Sq ApLIL y' fi r. - 0 2GOiNa00+rCcamz - S, it r P ,,.O90p5AdllYfEQ z . The Twin Cities Human Rights Campaign Dinner September 24, 2005 Minneapolis Convention Center 5:00 Patron Reception 6:00 Silent Auction 7:30 Dinner Program ALL TOGETHER. NOW. July 27, 2005 James Hovland Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th St Edina, MN 55424 Dear The Honorable James Hovland: Hopefully, you have received our initial letter of invitation sent a few weeks ago. If you have already RSVP'd for this year's dinner, thank you. If not, we would like to take an additional opportunity to invite you to become a member of the Honorary Committee at the 16`h Annual Twin Cities Human Rights Campaign Dinner. The Human Rights Campaign is this nation's largest non - profit advocacy organization working to ensure basic equal rights for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender citizens. This Washington -based organization currently has 650,000 members from the GLBT and allied communities and is in its twenty-fifth year of service. Our overall mission is to ensure that gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender Americans can be open, honest and safe at home, at work, and in the community. As an honorary guest, you are recognized in a listing in the dinner program, in lists projected on two large screens on the stage during the dinner, and all Honorary Guests will be collectively acknowledged verbally from the stage. Past and current HRC Honorary Guests have included the late Senator Paul and Sheila Wellstone, Minneapolis Superintendent Carol Johnson, Senator Mark Dayton, Father George Wertin, Representatives Martin Sabo, Representative Betty McCollum, Minneapolis Mayor R.T. Rybak, St. Paul Mayor Randy Kelly, Tipper Gore, Governor Tom and Christie Vilsack, Senator Tom Harkin and Wheelock Whitney. Newly appointed HRC President Joe Solmonese will be one of the speakers for the evening. In addition, other engaging speakers will be announced, as we get closer to the event. Last year's dinner attendance was 1,350, and we anticipate no less than 1,500 attendees this year. Becoming an Honorary Guest is simple. We ask only that you purchase a ticket to the dinner ($185 per person). Plus, as an Honorary Guest, you are invited to attend the Patron Reception from 5:00 -6:00 P.M. at no extra cost. The Patron Reception provides an opportunity to mingle with other political, business and community leaders, our generous corporate sponsors, and other HRC supporters. To confirm your acceptance, please contact Bob Brandt at 651- 699 -3336 or by e-mail at brandt.robert@comcast.net. You may purchase your tickets at www.boxofficetickets.com or by calling Box Office Tickets at 1- 800 -494 -8497. Your presence at this event will confirm your commitment to HRC's vision of an America where fairness and equality is available to all citizens. We would be honored to have you at this special event.. Edward Guzek & Janis Verruso 2005 HRC Dinner Committee Co- chairs Page 1 of 1 Jim Hovland From: Tsmeeh @aol.com Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2005 10:34 PM To: Jhovland @krauserollins.com Subject: Katie Meehan Mr. Mayor, As I watch the news with the passing of Chief Justice Rehnquist I realize what makes him so legendary. I believe his ability to unite the court in difficult decisions won him the approval of many and the ultimate role of "Chief'. You are not in a dissimilar position. You are faced with a difficult situation. However, it is a situation with a solution that "temporarily" solves the problem. This is not a neighborhood issue as you like to point out, we know it and you know it. This is no longer about the EHA as they have made clear their preference for a rink at Lewis. (Later changed to "whatever" because they have been strong -armed and told that a rink at Lewis is still so very feasible.) This is about personal agendas on the Park Board and a Park Board that holds neighborhood input at a distance. A "true" leader would have led this dilemma to an ultimate conclusion that felt satisfactory to all involved. Putting the boards "temporarily" back at Countryside Park would have satisfied the EHA because nothing would have changed. Putting them at Countryside would have satisfied Todd Park as the neighbors would not feel taken advantage of and misrepresented by the Edina Park Board. We truly need to believe that our voice counts and that the Edina Park Board can not have the power to just shove something down our throats. And, in addition, the greater community's need to skate will continue to be served as Todd Park continues to host a recreational rink. All this takes place while the City conducts an exhaustive study to the proper use of Edina's green and open spaces. You are more than welcome to this neighborhood's research and analysis. We truly seek the best outcome for all and that is why this fight continues. Please listen to us. We are valuable constituents that have a lot to offer to this fine city. Working with the people will always yield greater results and you know first hand the quality of people we represent. If only all Edina neighborhoods were as tight as ours, what a place this would be! Don't lose us to decision making that shows no regard for this neighborhood's voice. This is about more than whether a rink is placed in Todd Park, this is about how City politics unfold, and we are disillusioned. Katie Meehan 9/5/2005 CORRECTED TAB PROGRAMMING COMMITTEE AGENDA FOR SEPT. 21. Page 1 of 1 Jim Hovland From: Bill Hargis [Bill @billhargis.com] Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 5:33 PM To: Kevin Roggenbuck; jhovland @krauserollins.com Subject: RE: CORRECTED TAB PROGRAMMING COMMITTEE AGENDA FOR SEPT. 21. Revised agenda looks good to me. I will be able to attend but we will let Jim chair this meeting as well as October assuming his schedule allows him to be at both. From: Kevin Roggenbuck [mailto:kevin.roggenbuck @metc.state.mn.us] Sent: Fri 9/2/2005 1:55 PM To: jhovland @krauserollins.com; Bill Hargis Subject: CORRECTED TAB PROGRAMMING COMMITTEE AGENDA FOR SEPT. 21. Bill and Jim - My apologies, the TAB Programming Committee agenda for September 21 WILL NOT include discussion and action on the MN/DOT ATP target formula re- evaluation. Attached is the revised agenda with just the three information items. Kevin Roggenbuck, Transportation Coordinator Transportation Advisory Board Mears Park Centre, 230 E. Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 55101 phone: 651- 602 -1728 fax: 651- 602 -1739 kevin.roggenbuck@metc.state.mn.us 9/5/2005 Page 16 ADDITIONAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Presenters Brian Nerbonne, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Jennifer Schaust, Hennepin County Jim Hafner, MCWD Lorin Hatch, MCWD Cecilio Olivier, EOR, Inc. Stu Grubb, EOR, Inc. Jodi Polzin, EOR, Inc. Proiect Team Richard Beatty, USACE Kevin Bluhm, USACE Jodi Dutta, USACE Paul Nelson, HDR Engineering, Inc. Jim Noren, USACE Dan Reinartz, USACE John Shyne, USACE Kenton Spading, USACE Michael Wyatt, MCWD INTRODUCTION The Minnehaha Creek Visioning Partnership is a joint project by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) and the United States Army Corps of Engineers ( USACE). It is part of a larger watershed -scale planning and design effort for the watershed. The recommended Vision will be considered by both the MCWD and the USACE as they move forward with plans and designs. This Vision is also intended as guidance for other organizations, such as cities and the Minneapolis Park Board, which share creek corridor management responsibilities. The hope is that all organizations can work together toward a common vision for the creek. THE VISIONING PROCESS Both public and agency input were solicited for developing the Vision. Public input was obtained through an appointed Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC). Agency input was obtained through a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). The focus of the CAC was to recommend a Vision, recommend actions and explore the social feasibility of recommendations. The hope is that all organizations can work together toward a common vision for the creek. The role of the TAC was to assess the technical feasibility of recommendations made by the CAC. Participation for the CAC was requested from the following for a total of 23 participants: City of Minneapolis (2) City of Edina (2) Minnehaha Creek Visioning Partnership Planning for the Future of the Creek FINAL REPORT City of St. Louis Park (2) City of Hopkins (2) City of Minnetonka (2) Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board (2) Hennepin County (2) Citizens of the Watershed nominated by the MCWD (9) The process also accommodated additional interested citizens at the various workshops and activities held during the process, and an Open House meeting was held to obtain additional public input on the CAC recommendations. However, only the appointed CAC members "voted" on the final recommendations. The process used with the CAC consisted of twelve workshops organized into three Phases as follows. • Phase 1, called "Where have we been ? ", focused on developing a shared understanding of the history of the creek, and involved a workshop to develop a joint history/chronology of the creek and its environment. • Phase 2, called "Where are we now ? ", focused on determining current conditions of the creek, including current perceptions, desired attributes, and existing visions. Meeting topics included: Watershed management approaches Geomorphology and physical setting of the creek Watershed and land use characteristics Hydrology and hydraulics of the creek Water quality Aquatic biology Current perceptions of the creek Existing vision and plans by organizations along the creek corridor • Phase 3, called "Where can we be ?," focused on the development of a common vision and management recommendations. CAC meeting summaries are available upon request. The TAC met twice during the visioning process. The first meeting focused on introducing the project and the modeling scenarios. The second meeting presented the modeling scenario results and evaluated the technical feasibility of the scenarios. TAC meeting summaries are available upon request. Creek Facts: Minnehaha Creek flows 22 miles from the Headwaters at Lake Minne- tonka to the Mississippi River. The creek drops approximately 242 feet in elevation over the course of its run across the landscape -53 feet of which includes Minnehaha Falls (shown at the left). Mineeraba Creek Watershed District a E Page 2 DISCUSSION Discussion Conclusions This subsection presents the CAC recommendations. The section starts with summa- Tom Aasen ries of CAC and TAC discussions to provide context regarding the recommendations. • Hydrology is the main driver (i.e., The recommended vision and specific management recommendations follow the dis- primarily influences other characteris- cussion summaries. tics). CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE (CAC) • Aesthetics is the main receiver DISCUSSIONS (i.e., is primarily influenced by other The recommended vision was the result of much discussion. Two CAC exercises in characteristics). particular helped participants identify and discuss the desired condition of the creek Mary Karius and priorities. Results of these exercises are summarized below and followed by the • Land -based recreation is largely a recommended vision statement. receiver, or is influenced by other func- Lee Keeley tions. Aquatic life and water -based A swarming exercise was completed at the sixth meeting of the CAC. Participants recreation were also receivers. were asked to indicate what the current condition of the creek was and what it should • Water bank erosion, and be for various attributes. Results of the exercise are presented in a table on page 3, quality, where the number represents the number of participants that choose that condition. aquatic habitat are receivers from These results showed that for all attributes participants desired an improved condi- physical characteristics like flow, but tion. drive biological characteristics like Chuck Pfannenstein aquatic life. At a subsequent meeting participants were asked to rank these attributes, and were • Cultural resources Can be a re also asked through an ordinal ranking exercise, to rank a larger list of characteristics. Results of these exercises are presented in Figures 1 and 2 on page 4. These results ceiver if influenced by physical charac- show remarkable agreement, with the physical condition /streambank erosion ranked teristics like flow that erode or impact as the highest priority and aquatic life ranked second for each exercise. Most partici- cultural resources, but cultural re- pants agreed with the results, that erosion control should be a top management prior - sources can also drive management of ity. One participant disagreed, saying that erosion is a natural part of creeks. After many of the other characteristics from discussion, the CAC agreed that the problem was realty accelerated erosion. The CAC the perspective that they affect how also agreed that aquatic life and cultural /historic resources were top priorities. They they can be managed. also agreed that what is cultural /historical varies by reach but is comprised of. 1) the whole settinglhistory and settlement of Minnehaha Creek (e.g., its place in history • Open space does not have clear because of Longfellow's poem (The Song of Hiawatha) as well as the historical park linkages. It does, however, drive hy- visions of Cleveland and Wirth); and 2) the physical historical features, such as the drology /flow by affecting the amount of Grand Rounds, trails, mills, and WPA projects. In discussing open space, the CAC impervious surface and runoff. agreed that it is not so much the acreage of open space that is important, but the feeling of being surrounded by the natural environment with limited human encroach- 0 Flooding drives a number of other ment. issues, but it is also a receiver from hydrology. It can also be affected by When discussing the lower ranked characteristics, the participants agreed that they flow inefficiencies created by aquatic did not feel that canoeing was a low priority. Rather its lower ranking had to do with habitat (i.e., obstructions caused by its specificity as it is really a subset of recreation. One participant disagreed that fish - woody debris), sediment from bank ing should be a lower priority stating that the general public wants more fishing oppor- erosion, as well as how cul- tunities. Others thought that fishing as a recreational opportunity was not a high prior - tural /historic resources were originally ity. Another important exercise that influenced recommendations was the creation of a LIMITING CONDITIONS systems diagram showing the interrelationships between the following characteristics: flow /hydrology, aesthetics, land -based recreation, water -based recreation, aquatic life, streambank erosion, cultural resources, open space, flooding, aquatic habitat, and water quality. This exercise was done in a small breakout group. For each char- acteristic the group determined whether it drives (or controls or influences) versus whether it primarily receives, or is influenced by, other characteristics. This exercise led to the development of the figure shown to the left. The CAC also recognized that the vision of a desirable aesthetic for the corridor varies from person to person. For some, a desirable aesthetic means natural /wild vegeta- tion. Others view this as overgrown and want a more manicured look and an open view of the creek. The CAC agreed that an undesirable aesthetic is something that does not fit and appears unnatural or in a deteriorated, non - indigenous condition. Pnm L,.Jl %0—h..,. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Citizens Advisory Committee Additional Participants Tom Aasen Bill Allen Judy Bridell Tom Balcom Holly Buchanan George Beck Yvette Christianson John Bradford Dennis Davidson Jim Calkins Laura Huseby Jill Crafton John Iacono Charles Hanson Mary Karius Alex Hooker Jeff Lee An Hulbert Scott Neiman Lee Keeley David Oltmans Jay Kidder Steve Pieh Carol Kummer Helen Pitt Joan Lawless Gao Pronove Andy Lesch Robert Riesselman Paul Moldenhauer Suzi Rotering Josh Montgomery Jeffrey Ryan Chuck Pfannenstein Robert Schroeder Dan Salmon Jonathan Scott Bill Soules Glenn Strand Jack Sullivan James Thill Donna Woodruff Elected Officials Mayor Karen Anderson, City of Minnetonka Councilmember Scott Benson, City of Minneapolis Manager Pamela Blixt, MCWD Commissioner Bob Fine, Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board Councilmember Scot Housh, City of Edina Commissioner Peter McLaughlin, Hennepin County Councilmember Susan Santa, City of St. Louis Park Councilmember Tony Wagner, City of Minnetonka (alternate) Technical Advisory Committee Mitchell Sawh, City of Minneapolis Wayne Houle, City of Edina Joel Settles, Hennepin County Julie Ekman, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Wayne Barstad, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Tim Brown, Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board Jennifer Posma, City of Minnetonka Tim Larson, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Jim Vaughan, City of St. Louis Park Page 15 THE FINAL MEETING OF THE CAC AT MINNEHAHA FALLS Page 14 -- NEXT STEPS CAC members strongly fell that lhrongh the crirrent process they developed working relationships and knowledge of the creek that will be valuable to implementing the recommendations. At the meeting of the Elected Officials on August 3, 2005 it was decided that each individual organi- zation would review and approve the Vision developed by the CAC. Following the approval, each or- ganization would adopt a joint - resolution officially acknowledging the role of the organization in the implementation of the Vision. At the time of writing, only MCWD had adopted the draft resolution. On August 4, 2005, MCWD adopted the draft resolution presented to the group of Elected Officials the previous evening. MCWD plans to incorporate the overall Vision into its subwatershed planning for the Minnehaha Creek subwatershed and the overall Comprehensive Plan to be adopted for imple- mentation starting in 2007. On July 28, 2005, the CAC, MCWD, and the USACE held an open house for the general public. The purpose of the open house was to present the draft CAC recommendations and receive feedback from the general public. At the August 16, 2005 participants at the CAC meeting unanimously adopted the Minnehaha Vision- ing Partnership Recommendations Report. At this meeting the participants also discussed the future role of the CAC and agreed that: 1. The CAC should be kept informed regarding projects and progress of the Visioning Partnership. 2. CAC members should participate in presentations to the various City, County and Parks Boards to facilitate adoption of the recommendations. 3. The CAC should continue to be involved in future projects and planning efforts. CAC members strongly felt that through the current process they developed working relationships and knowledge of the creek that will be valuable to implementing the recommendations. The partici- pants also felt that consultation with the CAC on implementation should be on -going with the CAC considered part of the design team for upcoming projects. Some potential action actions for the CAC as a group or individual members include: • Reviewing and providing advice to the MCWD regarding the District's next Watershed Manage- ment Plan. • Serving on the MCWD's District -wide Citizen Advisory Committee. • Completing an annual review of progress with respect to the recommendations. • Providing review and advice to the MCWD, the USACE and other partners on individual projects as they are developed and designed. TECHNICAL ADVISO RI' COMMITTEE (TAC) DISCUSSIONS The TAC met on two separate occasions to review and discuss the approach to the development of the technical material produced by the project team and also material and recommendations resulting from the CAC discussions. The intended function of the TAC was to evaluate both the approach as well as the technical feasibility of implementing the overall Vision put forth by the CAC. The TAC meetings consisted of members from the Cities of Minnetonka, Hopkins, St. Louis Park, Edina and Minneapolis, the Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board, Hennepin County, Minnesota Pollution Control, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. The TAC acknowledged both the breadth and scope of the modeling effort undertaken by the project team but also recognized the limitations of these efforts. The TAC had the opportunity through meetings to receive clarification on technical issues, provide insight and represent the perspectives of each individual organization in the development of the technical material by the project team and recommended Vision by the CAC. Meeting summaries are available upon request. Page 3 Group Exercise: Evaluation of Creek Conditions Condition Current Condition Condition It Should Be Aquatic Life 1. Excellent: Diverse communities of fish and macroinvertebrates 9 2. Good: Communities better than typical urban streams 3 20 3. Fair: Communities typical of urban streams 18 1 4. Poor: Communities worse than typical urban streams 7 Canoeing Condition Current Condition Condition It 'Should Be . 1. Great: Sufficient Flow, good access, and safe 1 16 2. Good 8 11 3. Fair 14 4. Poor 4 5. No canoeing possible 1 Passive (hiking and nature viewing) Recreational Suitability Condition Current Condition Condition It Should Be 1. Good: Access and trails 4 20 2. Access and trails okay 7 6 3. Access and trails limiting 15 4. Passive recreation not enjoyable Physical Condition (erosion) Condition Current, Condition. Condition It Should Be 1. No bank erosion 11 2. Some bank erosion 3 16 3. Definite bank erosion 20 4. Severe bank erosion 4 Aesthetic Appearance Condition Current Condition Condition It., Should Be I. Beautiful 17 2. Minor aesthetic problems 6 10 3. Fair, overgrown, visibility limited, some trash 20 4. Poor, trash, debris and urban refuse common Flood Damage and Safety Condition Current Condition Condition It Should Be I. Minor: Overbank Flooding, no property damage 6 19 2. Moderate: Road crossing Flooding, traffic issue, some property (non - structure) damage 18 3 3. Major: Property damage to structures and safety (loss of life) issue Page 4 DISCUSSION �, RESULTS Figure 1: 1\linnehaha Creek Visioning Prioritization Results 25 - 20 I s � u � s e Le. R­ 41-,n —,n uartwu App— m., tauu:r¢r 1 aloe r e 'riteria Figure 2: Minnehaha Creek \ isioning Ordinal Ranking Results i 250 200 150 100 o � "C � c• a � a S' E Value /C'ritetia CREEK FACTS Overall conditfon Although visible erosion and Incising has occurred in the creek in Minneapolis and other areas, Minnehaha Creek now has a relatively stable channel profile be- cause numerous bridge cross- ings and other structures will prevent further incising. However, the channel width is not stable in several locations and was observed to be ex- panding. Portions of the stream are straightened and much of the riparian zone has been altered, managed now for turtgrass or parkland. Riparian zone habitat quality is marginal like in other urban stream corridors. Fish and aquatic macroinvertebrate habitat is limited- to-poor, like in other urban streams. -From the Minnehaha Creek Stream Assessment Data Report (2003) A section of the creek within the Minnehaha Parkway in the City of Minneapolis. Conditions Storm Sewer Outfalls There are 178 identified storm sewer outfalls larger than eight inches in diameter along the length of Minnehaha Creek. Outfalls are concentrated toward the lower end of the creek, with 122 (69 %) occurring below the Browndale Avenue Dam. Outfalls tend to cause severe local bank erosion and j scour. Bank Erosion There is bank erosion in nearly every one of the 30 reaches of Minnehaha i Creek. Erosion is largely a result of poor riparian zone management like removal of trees and shrubs near the stream coupled with establishing turtgrass to the j edge of the stream bank. There is evidence that the stream has incised significantly in the past; this causes increased potential for bank failures. The channel bank stability is further stressed by "flashy" storm discharges which produce high velocities, and rapid increases in stage. ! Stage also drops rapidly i after runoff events have ended. The rapid hydrograph decline can destabilize saturated banks. -From the Minnehaha Creek Stream Assessment Data Report (2003) RECOMMENDED DECISION CRITERIA The CAC discussed issues with sediment removal from ponds and /or dam removal, and concluded that these are site specific - decisions. There were also remaining questions about where to start and how to prioritize actions, particularly stream bank restorations. The CAC, therefore, developed the following list of criteria for decision makers to use when making these types of decisions. 1. What is the cost? 2. What is the benefit and is there a benefit to aquatic life or streambank erosion reduction? 3. How severe is the problem? With respect to bank erosion, what is the bank stability rating for the project area? 4. Who benefits and is there a public benefit? a. With respect to a sediment removal project, is the problem aesthetic, a navigation, or an aquatic life problem? b. With respect to streambank erosion control, is grade control sufficient? c. Is flow stabilized? 5. What is the cause of the problem, is it an enforcement or maintenance action, rather than a public improvement? 6. Will the action result in downstream impacts? 7. Will the action correct the source of the problem, or will systemic unresolved issues cause the problem to recur? With respect to a sediment removal project, are upstream sources con- trolled? 8. Is there public support? 9. Are there additional matching funds from partners and benefited parties? 10. Is the condition contributing to or causing other problems? 11. Can conditions be restored to an acceptable condition? With respect to dam removal, will stream be flows be maintained so that the trade is not from an open water pond to a dry streambed? 12. Is the effort consistent with the CAC Vision with respect to: a. Improving aquatic life b. Controlling streambank erosion c. Enhancing recreation d. Preserving cultural resources 13. What is the expected life and what are the maintenance needs of the improvement? 14. Does the proposed project use a minimum impact approach? OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS Some CAC members were concerned that the goals developed were hard to measure, and the CAC did not define measurable outcomes. However, the CAC also recognized that their charge in this process was to come up with an overall vision, and that measurable outcomes could be developed, but that these would be technical and beyond the charge and background of a citizen group. The CAC, therefore, recommends that the Watershed District develop measurable outcomes for each goal. Page 13 The CAC developed the following list of criteria for decision makers to use when making these types of decisions. Page 12 ... the C.AC felt that money would be better spent reducing sediment loads SEDIMENT REMOVAL The CAC recommends that sediment removal should not be a generally applied man- agement practice for any of the sections. However, there could be special cases for pools and ponds along the creek. The CAC recognized that if dams are left in place, sediment will accumulate in the pools, and periodic re- moval of sediment will be necessary to maintain open water aesthetics. In general, however, the CAC felt that money would be better spent reducing sediment loads (i.e., fixing the problem or control- ling sediment before it reaches the creek). The CAC also agreed that decisions regarding sediment removal from ponds were site - specific. They developed a list of recommended criteria for decision makers to use when making these types of deci- sions. These criteria are pre- sented on page 13 in the subsection titled Recom- mended Decision Criteria. DAM AND WEIR REMOVAL Habitat in Sections B and C of the creek is negatively im- pacted by the presence of dams and weirs. Removing some of these structures provides opportunities to cre- ate free - flowing stream chan- nels with habitat conditions restored. This would favor aquatic species adapted to flowing water rather than the lake types of species that currently dominate the creek biota. However, some of these structures have his- toric /cultural significance, as well as local value. One par- ticipant stated that a plan to remove Browndale Avenue Dam would certainty generate significant opposition. Other participants were hesitant to stop discussion of this con- cept for any of the structures without further study. One participant suggested that the acceptability of this practice would depend on what Certain reaches of the creek such as the example above are aggrading from sediment deposition over time. stream flows could be main- tained, and it would not be desirable to trade the pools fora dry stream bed. All par- ticipants agreed that deci- sions regarding dam /weir removal are site speck and that further study of the im- pacts and opportunities would be needed before de- tailed recommendations could be given. DAMS AND WEIRS TO BE INVESTIGATED FURTHER Section B: Browndale Avenue Dam Section C: West 44th Street grade con- 54th Street Weir - trot Hiawatha Avenue Weir Louisiana Avenue and Meadowbrook Road grade The CAC also developed a fist Dams and weirs such as this one controls at 34th Street in St. Louis Park of recommended criteria for impound water upstream which Blake Road and Lake Street decision makers to use when can result in negative effects NE grade controls making decisions regarding related to flooding, sediment West 34th Street weir dams and weirs. These trite- accumulation and the ecology of ria are presented on page 13 the creek. Recommendations Recommendations include an overall vision statement and spe- cific management recommenda- tions regarding various creek management issues. These spe- cific management issues include recommendations regarding the CAC's highest priorities: stream - bank erosion and aquatic life im- provement, as well as stream flow recommendations. The CAC also developed recommendations for improving water quality, as well as a number of criteria for decision makers to consider when making site specific decisions regarding dam /weir removal, sediment re- moval, and when prioritizing spe- cific projects. The CAC recognizes that recommendations vary de- pending on location, and some recommendations are organized by the stream sections shown in the figure below. VISION Overall Vision The Vision for Minnehaha Creek includes both an existing and desired sense of place. With respect to the existing sense of place, the creek: • is a corridor with various reaches and destinations, • Serves as a gathering place for peo- ple, • Provides recreational opportunities, • Is a contemporary cultural resource, yet it also reflects our history, and • Provides natural and aesthetic ex- periences unique to its setting. Within the creek corridor it is also desired to: • Provide balanced opportunities to experience the creek, • Improve the natural environment. • Improve water quality, • Have variation and physical differ- ences, and MMMMMM '��_�_ tsM.n w o •® Page 5 Vegetation provides stability to the streambanks, increases infiltration, dissipates raindrop energy, and offers benefits to the ecology of the creek. • Be reflective of our history and a priority for our future. Management Prforitles. CAC group exercises discussed above showed that erosion control and aquatic life were the highest ranked priorities for improvement. However, the CAC recog- nized that priorities and the primary man- agement emphasis varied by location along the creek. Therefore, the CAC was asked to recommend an overall manage- ment priority for the creek by section. These recommendations are presented in a table on page 6. When asked in this fashion, recreation came out as a higher management priority for Sections A and B than erosion and aquatic life. This change reflects the recognition that recreation is the primary use in the corridor, along with the recognition the erosion is less severe in the upper sections than it is in Section C. Earlier results with higher rankings for aquatic life and erosion also reflect the context of that discussion which was based on priorities for improvement. Recreation is already perceived as a well established use, and management to preserve and protect this use is important as can be seen from the results in the table on page 6. The overall vision em- phasizes recreation while improving the natural environment. Page 6 STREAMBANK EROSION RECOMMENDATIONS Improvements to streambank erosion were the technologies) over rip -rap, retaining walls, and other highest ranked priority overall for the creek, and, as forms of artificial stabilization. This preference is shown in the table below, was the highest ranked due to the habitat benefit from vegetation which management priority for Section C of the creek. complements the CAC's desire for improved aquatic Erosion is not perceived as being as severe in life in the creek. It was also recommended that any Sections A and B of the creek. For all sections, the storm sewer outfalls to the creek contributing to CAC prefers streambank stabilization technologies localized bank erosion be re- worked. that incorporate vegetation (i.e., bioengineering Management Priorities by Section Section A: From Grays Section B: Railroad Section C. From Brown - Management Bay to Railroad Crossing Crossing Below Interstate dale Dam to Mississippi Priority Below Interstate 494 494 Near Plymouth Road River Near Plymouth Road to Browndale Dam 1 Recreation, since this area is Recreation the launch point for much of the canoeing. Erosion control consistent with aquatic habitat and recreational aesthetics. 2 Aquatic life Aquatic life 3 Erosion is a lower priority Erosion with the qualifier that than the others since there erosion is more important in is not much documented in the downstream portions of this section, with only minor the section. amounts in the downstream portions of the section. An example of severe streambank erosion and bank ? failure at a site in Minneapolis. Streams naturally meander, however, in the urban environment, such movement can threaten infrastructure or private The — property. Minnehaha Creek Stream Assessment ° A,' Data Report (2003) identified approximately 34 000 feet of armored streambank along Minnehaha Greek, _ protected by either rip rap (rock) or retaining walls. This amounts to over 15% of the entire length of streambank. The CAC determined that bioengineering and vegetative stabilization were the preferred methods of addressing and preventing erosion problems. Bioen- gineering or soft armoring" reduces steam flow velocities and also supplements wildlife habitat through - out the corridor. it The Role of the U.S. Anny Corps of Engineers: Through this established part- nership, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USA CE) provided technical and plan- ning assistance to the Vision- ing Process. Some areas of support include the following: a. Hydrologic and hydraulic models of the watershed were developed; a rainfall - runoff model provided flow hydrographs for the period 1949 -2003; a reservoir - routing model analyzed various operating scenarios for Grays Bay Dam; a series of operating scenarios were run to show resultant flow regimes in Minnehaha Creek and the effects on Lake Minnetonka to as- sist in describing the effects on both human and ecosys- tem needs. b. Various biological factors affecting the watershed were identified and de- scribed. field surveys were conducted and the Tennant Method was used to esti- mate in- stream flow needs. c. Various water quality pa- rameters affecting the wa- tershed were analyzed, a pollutant loading model was used to analyze water qual- ity as a function of flow re- gime. d. Many geographic tools were developed which al- lowed the Vision partici- pants to more clearly "see" the watershed and more accurately discuss relevant watershed planning issues and their associated ef- fects. With its experience in de- veloping holistic manage- ment plans and large -scale planning and design efforts, the USACE also helped by providing planning support and insight to the Visioning Process. The USACE partici- pated in and helped plan Page 11 STREAMFLOW MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATION The CAC spent much time discussing the flow scenarios, and understood that the scenar- ios presented represented a first cut at what would happen with changes to the operation of the Grays Bay Dam. Technical design and modeling documentation regarding the flow scenarios is presented in a separate technical report which is available on request. The CAC understood that while the operational scenarios modeled did not show large bene- fits, they did show some benefits, and that there is the potential for an operational sce- nario that balances upstream and downstream uses. The CAC agreed to the following statement and recommendation: M Responsible organizations should strive to moderate extreme flows, and target a sustained year round minimum flow. A year round minimum flow is an integral part of achieving the vision of improving the aquatic life of Minnehaha Creek, while moderating extreme flow is impor- tant for stream bank stability. Thus, further study is recommended to find a means to optimize and /or balance year round minimum flows, and moderate extreme flows while continuing to sup- port other uses. Water discharged from the Headwaters at Lake Minnetonka contributes to the base flow for the creek. WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATION The CAC developed the following water quality recommendations. Improve Stormwater Management by: • Reducing peak stormwater flows; • Reducing the discharge of contaminated stormwater using holding areas, wetlands, rainwater gardens and land use planning; • Repairing stormwater outfall that are currently causing erosion; and • Reducing stormwater contamination through the use of good house keeping types of best management practices, such as fertilizer ordinances and yard care practices that reduce pollutants at their source. • Continue water quality monitoring in order to develop a baseline condition, identify problems and trends, and evaluate effectiveness of implementation efforts. • Develop a "report card" for Minnehaha Creek to assist with communicating and evaluating the condition of the creek. • Incorporate volunteers into monitoring efforts. t MCWD Staff monitors Minnehaha Creek on a weekly basis throughout the growing season Page 10 SECTION C— RIPARIAN VEGETATION BRAINSTORMING IDEAS MANAGE S TOR MWATER Incorporate stormwater management in re- development and consider in land use planning Create stormwater marshes, holding areas, and marshes that slow and settle down flow before entering the creek Create rain gardens on Mpls Park Board Property Create rainwater garden demonstration sites at parking areas and other large sites More wetlands in the floodplain Reduce street runoff (trash, pollutants, etc.) PHYSICAL CONDITION Discourage goat paths Grade control Reduce human and mechanical effects (vehicles, construction, mowing, etc.) Target highly eroded banks for revetments Manage invasive species Restore meanders in reaches 7 -8 inventory existing plant species and encourage native plant species in buffer zone Wood duck nests, wren houses, eagle platforms Narrow paths and roadways (pavement reduction) Burn natural vegetation areas More un -mowed surface near the creek Leave a 25 -foot wide buffer of un -mowed vegetation Sustainable trail design Encourage native vegetation INCENTIVES AND DISINCENTIVES Provide free (grass or prairie) seed or shoots, Etc. Provide tax credit for natural vegetation on private property Provide incentives for landowners for good /positive practices Promote citizen "adopt -a- stretch" EDUCATION Marketing Publicity Do model (demonstration) sites, test sites, with signs explaining what is going on Educate local landowners and users about reducing impacts. (Penalize if necessary) Signs explaining the value of prairie, etc. Community outreach to residents regarding downspout direction and direct them to greenspace Adopt the NWF wildlife program by blocks or neighborhoods "Naturalize" tolerate natural imperfections. (Don't try to "over - civilize" the corridor) Schools adopt a stretch, improve it (science project) Educate city employees and Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board (MPRB) on Best Management Practices (BMP's) and where grass clippings shouldn't be, where tree sawdust should be, erosion control measures in city projects Educate park system users on low - impact recreation and educate adjacent landowners on yard maintenance Local history - Post old pictures of same locations (before, after, now...) �tw���at��awp�• Communicate the vision to decision makers Deputize local residents to observe, record, report, or intervene in local "problems." Post boundaries More money for management Ordinance for land -use planning providing more green space for infiltration of storm water. Provide buffer or alternative to water treatment. Setting guidance for riparian zone Survey the segment to evaluate current condition Improve inter - government coordination Purchase easements Maintain investments in restoration projects (educate & train volunteers to manage projects) Page 7 AQUATIC HABITAT MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS Aquatic life was the second highest ranked priority of the CAC. Presentations by experts showed that the most significant limiting conditions for aquatic life are stream flow, particularly the lack of winter flow in the creek, and poor quality habitat. Flow recommendations presented in the next subsec- tion address the quantity of habitat that occurs at different flows. However, those recommendations do not address the quality of habitat. To address the quality of habitat, recommendations were de- veloped for: • In- stream habitat (indirect or direct management) • Woody debris management INSTREAM HABITAT Given the wetland characteristics of Section A, the CAC felt there is little to gain from active management of in- stream habitat. in Sections B and C, the CAC acknowledged the importance of good in- stream habitat for aquatic organisms, but prefers to indirectly manage in- stream habitat by manag- ing riparian vegetation and encourag- ing the retention of woody debris. • Riparian vegetation management • Sediment removal (e.g., dredging) • Dam and weir removal Maintaining a healthy aquatic habitat can benefit any number of organisms from ter- restrial animals such as birds and mammals to fish and macroimrnebrates (pictured above). WOODY DEBRIS The recommendations regarding management of woody debris in the creek pre- sented in the table below were shaped by the following findings and considera- tions: • One of the limiting factors for aquatic life in Minnehaha Creek is poor habitat quality. • Woody debris is a natural component of many streams and adds complex- ity to aquatic habitat by providing substrate for organisms to colonize, creating refuge areas, and by creating pools. • Currently quality habitat created by woody debris is largely missing from Minnehaha Creek. • Woody debris can obstruct the creek and create problems for canoeing. • Woody debris can become entangled in bridges and culverts affecting flooding. Recommended Management Approach for Woody Debris Section A Section B Section C Given the wetland and lake like Woody debris provides an impor- Woody debris provides an impor- characteristics of this section tant habitat benefit and should be tant habitat benefit and should woody debris probably was not a encouraged. However, it should be encouraged. However, it significant historic factor. Thus, be removed /managed where is should be removed /managed there is no recommendation to creates obstructions to canoeing where it creates obstructions to actively manage woody debris. and potentially impacts flooding. canoeing and potentially impacts floodin . Page a RIPARIAN VEGETATION MANAGEMENT Riparian vegetation management was perceived as an integral part of achieving the CAC's Vision for improving aquatic life in Minnehaha Creek. The CAC recommends a preferred approach to in- stream habitat management that indirectly manages in- stream habitat by managing riparian vegetation and encouraging the retention of woody debris. With this approach, the riparian corridor becomes the primary mechanism for managing in- stream habitat. The CAC spent much time discussing specific recommendations for riparian vegetation management. These discussions resulted in the following overall recommendations: • Develop a community and organizational philosophy that values minimal impact approaches for both citizen and public works activities within the riparian corridor by. 0 Establishing a more natural riparian buffer to serve as a source of woody debris, wildlife habi- tat, and a separation from urban uses; 0 Encouraging the establishment of a natural buffer that enhances streambank stability; 0 Encouraging native plant species; and 0 Controlling invasive plant species. • Create incentives for good /positive practices and for the use of native vegetation through tax credits, cost sharing, and availability of free seeds/plants and technical assistance. • Use marketing, promotional, public relations, social pressure and education efforts to foster a change in expectations and behavior that embraces a more natural /native riparian environment. • Develop and maintain a shared implementation vision for the riparian corridor by: 0 Communicating the vision of the committee to decision makers, 0 Maintaining the investment through on -going maintenance of restoration efforts, 0 Improving inter - government coordination, and 0 Completing periodic progress reviews. The CAC also developed recommendations and brain- stormed implementation ideas for the creek Sections B and C (see pages 9 -10). In general, the CAC felt that riparian conditions in Section A were in pretty good shape. What is most needed is to protect it from encroachment by development. When asked about the desirability of water level management of the wetland area upstream of 1- 494 to help manage vegeta- tion and exotic species, par- ticipants felt that the benefits and management actions for this were not sufficiently un- derstood to give an opinion. Water level management in the wetland is possible be- cause of a stop log structure located where the creek flows under 1-494. For Sections B and C, ripar- ian vegetation management needs to be completed as a combination of agency action and encouragement of local property owners. Specific ideas for consideration for Sections B and C are pre- sented in two adjoining tables on pages 9 and 10, respec- tively. The CAC felt that these ideas need more evaluation and decided to include them in this report not as recom- mendations, but as ideas for further consideration. Riparian vegetation management was perceived as an integral part of achieving the CAC's Vision for improving aquatic life in Minnehaha Creek. 1{ An Iowa Darter, one of the varied species of fish found in Minnehaha Creek. (MNDNR 2003) Page 9 SECTION B— RIPARIAN VEGETATION BRAINSTORMING IDEAS MANAGE STORMWATER More high water storage (e.g., ponds and wetlands) Modify trails to reduce impervious (reducing impermeable surfaces, by replacing cement with wood chips or natural materials on paths (rain gardens)) Changing of drain design to not let as much debris into creek Reduction of storm /drains that flow into creek Storm water outfalls need help... Minnetonka Mills Area. (Use box outfalls, armour outfall areas, reduce flashiness, store water) Reduce negative inflow (e.g., from storm sewers, lawns) INCENTIVES Offer incentives Tax breaks for good stewardship $1 million on lake Mtka (maybe $100,000 on creek) in taxes /property which you get back if you change your ways Planting of plants and /or trees that will have positive effect (along banks) 0 to 20 feet back Create riparian vegetation at parks to encourage participation Plant trees along Hwy 100 Create incentives to remove chain link fences, steel walls, wooden barriers, and fake rock from shoreline EROSION CONTROL REM EDIATION Controlling stormwater Stormwater volume control Fix direction of stormwater pipes Dredging where outfall areas create problems, but not aesthetics like Mill pond - unless private funding. EDUCATION Involve neighbors (e.g. not cutting down to creek - buffer) Parks as an example Creek clean up (garbage. etc.) Education of residents Not dumping ground Native /Positive vegetation Lawn care consequence, options Get information out to general public about what they can do to lessen negative impact habits Community awareness Newsletters Community gatherings in city parks 'Minnehaha Creek Days' Communication plan with cities Signs on trails Give recognition for good stewardship Work with businesses, (proactivety) to address creek pollution runoff issues (e.g., Methodist Hosp., Target) Get cities /other organizations to follow recommendations Provide planting recommendations and mgmt. guidelines to neighborhoods Education of property owners Financial aid Technical support Physical help 'Call for Help" list of agencies Do small things Support lower food chain life will support higher food chain life Support buffers/macroinvertebrates Talk with city to change practice of cutting grass (maintaining grass) around the creek. City needs to model the behavior. Memo To: City Manager Gordon Hughes From: Communications Director Jennifer Bennerotte CC: Cable Production Assistants Date: August 31, 2005 Re: Time Warner Cable Thank you for sharing with me the memorandums sent from Brian Grogan of Moss and Barnett and Lance Leupold of Time Warner Cable regarding the City of Edina's ongoing difficulties in achieving quality playback of our programming on Edina Community Channel 16 (EDINA 16). Both our system designer, Richard Jamieson of Jamieson & Associates, and I have reported playback problems since we began airing meetings of the Edina City Council in May 2004. Improvements have been made, but none to my complete satisfaction. Lighting According to Mr. Leupold's memo, he and his staff at Time Warner Cable believe that our new staff lowered the lighting levels in the Council Chambers, improving the over - exposed or washed out look some viewers have reported. The lighting levels have NOT been adjusted. My crew properly color balances the cameras before each meeting (a service the City of Bloomington did not provide for us when they were taping meetings). That has helped with playback, but not resolved the issues. Audio On a handful of occasions, viewers have reported the audio out of sync. On other occasions, audio has not played at all. These issues also stem from Time Warner Cable's encoding process. Whenever an audio problem has been reported, Time Warner has resolved the matter before the next broadcast of a meeting. However, in my opinion, these problems should be identified and resolved before the first broadcast. Improperly encoded tapes should not be aired. Time Warner technicians should double -check to make sure encoding has been successful (on all tapes) before a meeting is aired. Segmenting In his memo, Mr. Leupold said he would be happy to explore options for the delivery of programming to Time Warner Cable. Since we currently record to DVD, I would really appreciate it if Time Warner could seriously consider receiving that type of media. With one DVD instead of multiple tapes, all segmenting problems should be resolved. Summary Time Warner Cable Access Administrator Michelle Glynn suggested to me that their lower -end equipment might have difficulty encoding our media, captured with high -end, wide - format high - definition cameras. I agree with Mr. Leupold that further evaluation and adjustments are in order. In his memo, Mr. Leupold offered to loan the City of Edina a digital recorder to facilitate digital -to- digital mastering for its playback system. I think we should take him up on that offer to see if that makes a difference in the quality of playback. As things are now, if you played a tape of one of meetings next to a Time Warner broadcast of the same meeting, I have no doubt that you would see a difference in quality. In fact, Mr. Leupold has suggested that sort of demonstration. Those in attendance should be Mr. Leupold, Ms. Glynn, me, at least one of our cable production assistants and perhaps a representative of Alpha Video (our system engineer). There is not a need for Mr. Jamieson to be present. In summary, I believe the following should be complete before the transfer of the franchise is approved by the City: • Time Warner Cable to consider receipt of DVD or MPEG2 instead of SVHS • Time Warner Cable to loan City digital recorder (and its use evaluated thereafter) • Time Warner Cable and City to review a tape together before broadcast, identify and resolve issues before playback If you have any questions, please contact me. Thank you. • Page 2