Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-09-20_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA EDINA MOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 20, 2005 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda 'is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of September 6, 2005 II. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS - As per Pre -List dated September 7, 2005, TOTAL $206.50. III. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL COMMENDATION OF EDINA MECHANICS J._ANA READS "THE KITE RUNNER" MONTH PROCLAIMED EDINA KIDS CLUB PRESENTATION TO EDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of September 6, 2005 II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Zoning Ordinances: First Reading requires affirmative rollcall votes of three Council members except that a rezoning from residential to non - residential requires four affirmative votes. Second Reading requires affirmative rollcall votes of three of Council to pass except rezoning from, residential to non - residential requires four affirmative votes. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall votes of four members of Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council members required passing. Conditional Use Permit: Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council members required to pass. Variance Appeal: Favorable rollcall of Council Members present to uphold or deny appeal Rollcall A. PUBLIC HEARING - FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. Gramercy Club of Edina, 5101 West 701h Street B. SET HEARING DATE (10/4105) - Preliminary and Final Plat, Gramercy Club of Edina, 5101 West 70th Street C. SET HEARING DATE (10/4/05) - Final Rezoning and Final Plat - Riverview Commercial Properties - 501h Street & Indianola Avenue Rollcall • • • • Agenda /Edina City Council September 20, 2005 Page 2 III. ORDINANCES - First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of three Council members to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative vote of four Council members to pass. A. FIRST READING - Ordinance No. 2005 -10 - Amending Section 150 of City Code of Ordinances - Personnel Ordinance IV. AWARD OF BID A. Repave West Parking Lot - Lewis Park V. REPORTS/ RECOMMENDATIONS A. Appointments to Edina Community Health Committee and Heritage Preservation Board B. Approval of Settlement and Release Agreement - Ramsey Excavating C. Traffic Safety Staff Review Minutes of September 6, 2005 D. Minnehaha Creek, Watershed District Grant Agreement Resolution E. Insurance Request For Proposals F. Resolution No. 2005 -84 Authorizing Execution of City Readiness Initiative Grant Agreement G. Resolution No. 2005 -85 Authorizing Execution of Public Health Emergency Preparedness Grant VI. FINANCE A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per Pre -List dated September 7, 2005, TOTAL $922,082.19; and September 14, 2005, TOTAL $970,552.41. VII. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS VIII. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS IX. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES X. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL XI. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEM SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS Tues Oct 4 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Oct 18 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Nov 1 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tue Nov 8 GENERAL ELECTION DAY - POLLS OPEN FROM 7.A.M. TILL 8 P.M. Fri Nov 11 VETERAN'S DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Office Closed Tues Nov. 15 Meet with Legislative Delegation 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Nov 15 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thur Nov 24 THANKSGIVING DAY HOIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Office Closed Fri Nov 25 DAY AFTER THANKSGIVING DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Office Closed Mon Dec 5 Truth In Taxation Hearing 5:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Dec 6 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Dec 20 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCL CHAMBERS Mon Dec 26 CHRISTMAS DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Office Closed MINUTES OF THE JOINT MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL SEPTEMBER 6, 2005 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioner/Member Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson and Chair/Mayor Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner /Member Housh and seconded by Commissioner/Member Swenson approving the Consent Agenda for the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE JOINT MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL FOR AUGUST 16, 2005, APPROVED. Motion made by Commissioner/Member Housh and seconded by Commissioner/Member Swenson approving the, Joint Meeting Minutes of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority and the Edina City Council for August 15, 2005. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. TRANSFER OF PROPERTY — HAUGLAND DEVELOPMENT Director Hughes explained on May 3, 2005, the Council approved a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for the mixed use redevelopment proposal of the Haugland Companies at 50`h & France. The mixed use development will have both retail and residential uses. The approval was granted conditioned upon "platting the property to incorporate all easements, vacations and dedications ". Mr. Hughes referred to Exhibit 1, which illustrated the property to be conveyed by the HRA to 5000 France LLC subject to reservation of easements. Mr. Hughes pointed out that Exhibit 2 illustrated a parcel of City property that lies between the two HRA parcels and would be conveyed to 5000 France LLC; subject to reservation of easements. Mr. Hughes said lastly, Exhibit 3 depicted the vacation of the utility easement to be relocated elsewhere on the property. He recommended the HRA and City conveyances should be conditioned upon the reservation of easements as appropriate for existing utilities and rights of way. New easements will be rededicated when the final plat of the property was filed following substantial completion of the project. Gene Haugland, owner of the subject property stated that 5000 France, under the advice of their attorney's, was a regular limited liability corporation known as 5000 France Company. Commissioner Masica made a motion to close the public hearing seconded by Commissioner Housh. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Commissioner Swenson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2005-3 CONVEYING CERTAIN PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY PROPERTY TO 5000 FRANCE COMPANY NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, that the following described real property is hereby authorized to be conveyed to 5000 France Company from the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority subject to reservation of easements for existing utilities and rights of way: PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO BE CONVEYED: Those parts of Lot 45, Auditor's Subdivision No. 172, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: 1. Commencing at a point on the East line of said Lot 45, 190.00 feet North of the South line thereof; thence West along a line parallel to said South line a distance of 100.00 feet; thence North along a line parallel to said East line a distance of 3.00 feet, thence East along a line parallel to said South line a distance of 100.00 feet to a point in said East line 3.00 feet North of the point of beginning; thence South along said East line a distance of 3.00 feet to the point of beginning; and 2. The North 3.00 feet of the South 193.00 feet of the West 13.90 feet of the East 113.90 feet; also the North 1.90 feet of the South 191.90 feet of the West 36.10 feet of the East 150.00 feet; all in Lot 45, Auditor's Subdivision No. 172, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and 3. That part of the North 113.00 feet of the South 183.00 feet of the East 150.00 feet of said Lot 45, Auditor's Subdivision No. 172, Hennepin County, Minnesota; bounded by the following described line: Beginning at the Northeast corner of the South 183.00 feet of said Lot 45, thence South 00 degrees 20 minutes 20 seconds East, assumed basis of bearings 4.15 feet along the East line of said Lot 45; thence on a bearing of West 48.18 feet; thence Westerly 49.02 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the South radius 101.29 feet, central angle 27 degrees 43 minutes 43 seconds; thence South 62 degrees 16 minutes 17 seconds West, 32.39 feet, thence Southwesterly 43.93 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the Southeast, radius 50.00 feet, central angle 50 degrees 20 minutes24 seconds, to the West line of the East 150.00 feet of said Lot 45; thence North 00 degrees 20 minutes 20 seconds West 64.78 feet along said West line, to the North line of the south 183.00 feet of said Lot 45; thence on a bearing of East 150.00 feet along said North line to the point of beginning, Except, however, that part above an elevation of 897 feet above mean sea level, 1929 adjustment. Which lie east of the west line of the east 101.42 feet of said Lot 45. Also, the South 2.45 feet of the East 51.00 feet of Lot 47, Auditor's Subdivision No. 172, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Passed and adopted this 61h day of September, 2005. Attest: 2 Gordon L. Hughes, Executive James B. Hovland, Chair Director Commissioner Hulbert seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson to close the public hearing. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland. Motion carved. Member Masica made a motion introducing the following resolution and moving its adoption, granting the requested easement conditioned upon a rededication of required easements: RESOLUTION NO. 2005-81, A RESOLUTION APPROVING VACATION OF PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT FOR HAUGLAND DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, a motion of the City Council, on the August 2, 2005, fixed a date for a public hearing on a proposed vacation of utility easements; and WHEREAS, two weeks published and posted notice of said hearing was given and the hearing was held on September 6, 2005, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City and of the public that said vacation be made; and WHEREAS, the Council considered the extent the vacation affects existing easements within the area of the vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any persons, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric, telephone or cable television poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation to continue maintaining the same, or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove or otherwise attend thereto: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, that the following described public utility easements are hereby vacated effective as of August 16, 2005: PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS TO BE VACATED: The West 10 feet of the East 56 feet of the South 42 feet of Lot 47, Auditor's Subdivision No. 172, according to the recorded copy thereof Also the West 10 feet of the East 56 feet of the North 3 feet of the South 193 feet of Lot 45, said Auditor's Subdivision No. 172. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause a notice of completion of proceedings to be prepared, entered in the transfer record of the County Auditor, and filed with the County Recorder, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851. Passed and adopted this 6th day of September, 2005. Member Hulbert seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland, 3 Motion carried Member Hulbert made a motion to close the public hearing for the conveyance of a parcel of property to 5000 France Company of the public right of way subject to reservation of easements as appropriate, seconded by Member Swenson. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Masica made, a motion approving conveyance to 5000 France Company of the public right of way subject to reservation of easements as appropriate, seconded by Member Swenson. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh; Hulbert, Masica Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Commissioner/Member Housh and seconded by Commissioner/Member Swenson approving the payment of claims dated August 17, 2005, TOTAL $737.50. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda, Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned. Executive Director 4 R55CKREG L0020000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # 13949 9/8/2005 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 206.50 LEGAL 206.50 206.50 Grand Total CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/8/2005 — 9/812005 Doc No Inv No Account No 119889 1256768 9134.6131 Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 206.50 Total Payments 206.50 917/2005 16:00:53 Page - 1 Business Unit GRANDVIEW TAX DISTRICT R55CKSUM LOG20000 Company 09000 HRA FUND Amount 206.50 Report Totals 206.50 CITY OF EDINA 9/7/2005 16:00:58 Council Check Summary Page - 1 9/8/2005 - 9/8/2005 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing Policies and procedures d to , � lr _ � _, -, �o \�N��ORPOFiP'"�E„ • IBBA RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION WHEREAS, on the morning of August 30`h, 2005, City mechanic Eddy Von was working on golf cart that was set on a hoist, when the golf cart moved and pinned Eddy between the golf cart and hoist. Within seconds, fellow mechanics Todd Halstead, Tony Leone, Greg Bretson, and seasonal employee Ricky Harrison proceeded to lift the cart off Eddy Von. Another City mechanic, Jim Voelker, who is also a Rosemount volunteer firefighter, alerted the City's Fire Department and started to assess Eddy's injuries and apply first aid. Edina Police and Paramedics arrived shortly to take control of the situation and transfer Eddy to Southdale Hospital. WHEREAS, without the immediate and professional assistance of Todd Halstead, Tony Leone, Greg Bretson, Jim Voelker, and Ricky Harrison, Eddy Von's injuries would have been much worse than they were. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council, City staff and all Edina residents hereby express thanks and commend Todd Halstead, Tony Leone, Greg Bretson, Jim Voelker, and Ricky Harrison for their quick response and action in helping a potentially seriously injured co- worker. Dated this 20`h day of September 2005. Mayor James B. Hovland . o� 0 \ lase PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, Edina Reads is a one -book community -wide reading program that encourages active reading, lifelong learning and thoughtful conversation; and, WHEREAS, literature has the power to create connections and deeper understanding among the diverse people who live, work and go to school in Edina; and, WHEREAS, open, intergenerational dialogue brings healthier perspectives to children, youth and adults; and, WHERAS, the City of Edina, Edina Community Foundation, Edina Human Rights and Relations Commission, Edina Senior Center, Friends of the Edina Community Library, Friends of the Southdale Resource Library and Hennepin County Library have signed on as official sponsors of Edina Reads and have selected The Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini because of its emphasis on the themes of character, courage and redemption, human rights and intergenerational communication; and WHEREAS, the sponsors have arranged a series of community events during the month of October, including book discussions, panels, speakers and film screenings, NOW, THEREFORE, I, James B. Hovland, Mayor of the City of Edina, do hereby proclaim October 2005 as "Edina Reads: The Kite Runner" Month in the City of Edina to bring attention to the value of reading and lifelong learning and to encourage schools, faith communities, service clubs, businesses, neighborhoods and other formal or informal groups in Edina to engage in reading and discussion of The Kite Runner. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor -1 TZ A _ o Le �t%� y EDINA KIDS CLUB PRESENTATION TO EDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT No packet data ❑ Oral presentation 1-1 Information coming MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL SEPTEMBER 6, 2005 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Housh approving the Council Consent Agenda as presented with the exception of Agenda Item I. approval of Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina City Council of August 16, 2005. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. POSITION OF AGENDA ITEM NO. XI. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL MOVED UP ON THE COUNCIL AGENDA Member Masica requested Agenda Item No. XI. Special Concerns of Mayor and Council be moved up on the Council Agenda to allow additional information and discussion on the Todd Park hockey rink previously approved at the August 16, 2005, Council Meeting. Member Swenson commented that a discussion was acceptable but not another lengthy public hearing. Motion made by Member Masica approving placing Agenda Item No. XI. Special Concerns of Mayor and Council following Agenda Item. No. VI.C. to allow further discussion.regarding installation of a hockey rink at Todd Park. Member Hulbert seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL FOR AUGUST 16, 2005, APPROVED Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Swenson, approving the Minutes of the Special Meeting of the Edina City Council for August 16, 2005. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL FOR AUGUST 16, 2005, APPROVED AS AMENDED Member Masica said she removed the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina City Council for August 16, 2005, to correct a statement in the Special Assessment portion of the Minutes which should read, 'all assessments will offer a level principal payment schedule instead of an amortized payment schedule'. Following a brief explanation, Member Masica made a motion to approve the Minutes of August 16, 2005, as corrected. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 1 it Minutes/Edina City Council/September 6, 2005 CONSTITUTION WEEK PROCLAIMED SEPTEMBER 17 - 23, 2005 Mayor Hovland proclaimed September 17 - 23, 2005, as Constitution Week in the City of Edina and urged all citizens to study the Constitution and reflect on the privilege of being an American. Members of the Daughters of the American Revolution (DAR) accepted the proclamation and presented the Council with a poster proclaiming Constitution Week. Member Masica made a motion approving the proclamation, proclaiming September 17 - 24, 2005, as Constitution Week in the City of Edina., Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. . ROTARY CLUB OF EDINA PRESENTATION MADE TO EDINA FIRE DEPARTMENT Mayor Hovland introduced Sandy Schley and David Hartzung from the Edina Rotary, that thanked the Edina, Fire Department and presented Chief Scheerer with a $1,995.00 check that will cover the cost of the purchase of a defibrillator for the community. RESOLUTION NO. 2005 - 81 APPROVING' VACATION OF PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT FOR HAUGLAND DEVELOPMENT /CONVEYANCE OF PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY for HAUGLAND DEVELOPMENT APPROVED Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Manager Hughes explained on May 3, 2005, the, Council approved a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for the mixed use redevelopment proposal of the Haugland Companies at 50th & France. The mixed use development will have both retail and residential uses. The approval was granted conditioned upon "platting the property to incorporate all easements, vacations and dedications. Mr. Hughes said Exhibit 1, illustrated the property to be conveyed to 5000 France LLC subject to reservation of easements on the property. Mr. Hughes pointed out that Exhibit 2 illustrated a parcel of City property laying between the two HRA parcels and would be conveyed to 5000 France LLC, subject to reservation of easements. He said Exhibit 3 depicted the vacation of the utility easement to be relocated elsewhere on the property. Mr. Hughes recommended the HRA and City conveyances be conditioned upon the reservation of appropriate easements for existing utilities and rights -of -way and noted new easements will be rededicated when the final plat of the property was filed following substantial completion of the project. Gene Haugland, owner of the subject property stated that 5000 France, under the advice of their attorney was now a regular limited liability corporation known as 5000 France Company. Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson to close the public hearing. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland. Motion carried. Member Masica made a motion introducing the following resolution and moving its adoption, granting the requested easement conditioned upon the rededication of required easements: RESOLUTION NO. 2005-81 Page 2 Minutes/Edina City Council/September 6, 2005 A RESOLUTION APPROVING VACATION OF PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT FOR HAUGLAND DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, a motion of the City Council, on the August 2, 2005, fixed a date for a public hearing on a proposed vacation of utility easements; and WHEREAS, two weeks published and posted notice of said hearing was given and the hearing was held on September 6, 2005, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City and of the public that said vacation be made; and WHEREAS, the Council considered the extent the vacation affects existing easements within the area of the vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any persons, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric, telephone or cable television poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation to continue maintaining the same, or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove or otherwise attend thereto: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, that the following described public utility easements are hereby vacated effective as of August 16, 2005: PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS TO BE VACATED: The West 10 feet of the East 56 feet of the South 42 feet of Lot 47, Auditor's Subdivision No. 172, according to the recorded copy thereof Also the West 10 feet of the East 56 feet of the North 3 feet of the South 193 feet of Lot 45, said Auditor's Subdivision No. 172. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is authorized and directed to. cause a notice of completion of proceedings to be prepared, entered in the transfer record of the County Auditor, and filed with the County Recorder, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851. Passed and adopted this 6th day of September, 2005. Member Hulbert seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Hulbert made a motion to close the public hearing for the conveyance of a parcel of property to 5000 France Company of the public right of way subject to reservation of easements as appropriate, seconded by Member Swenson. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Masica made a motion introducing the following resolution and moving its adoption approving conveyance to 5000 France Company of the public right of way subject to reservation of easements as appropriate, seconded by Member Swenson. RESOLUTION NO. 2005-83 CONVEYING CERTAIN PUBLIC Page 3 Minutes/Edina City Council/September 6, 2005. RIGHT OF WAY PROPERTY TO 5000 FRANCE COMPANY NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the. City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, that the following described real property is hereby authorized to be conveyed to 5000 France Company from the City of Edina subject to reservation of easements for existing utilities and rights of wad: PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO BE CONVEYED: The east 101.42 feet of the south 7.00 feet of the north 10.00 feet of the south 193.00 feet of Lot 45, Auditor's Subdivision No. 172, Hennepin County, Minnesota . Passed and adopted this 6th day of September, 2005. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *HEARING DATE SET OF SEPTEMBER 20, 2005 FOR FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN- - GRAMERCY CLUB OF EDINA (5101 WEST,7QTH STREET) Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Swenson setting hearing date of September 20, 2005, for Final Development Plan for the Gramercy Club of Edina at 5101 West 70th Street. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *APPEAL OF DECISION OF ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FOR ACCREDITED INVESTORS, INC. SIGN (5200 WEST 73RD STREET) .CONTINUED TO OCTOBER 4, 2005 Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Swenson continuing the Appeal of Decision of Zoning Board of Appeals for Accredited Investors, Inc. sign at 5200 West 73rd Street until regular meeting of October 4, 2005. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. ORDINANCE NO. 2005 -9 APPROVED AMENDING SECTION 185 - SCHEDULE A, INCREASING THE STORM WATER RATES EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 31, 2005 Manager Hughes explained the Special Assessment Policy adopted at the August 16, 2005, Council Meeting, included a provision necessitating an increase in. storm water rates to pay for curb and gutter for reconstruction projects. The ordinance will increase stormwater rates by $4.00 per quarter for each residential equivalent unit effective. for the fourth quarter billing beginning with the fall quarter. He stated of the $4.00 amount, $2.00 will go to fund current utility projects including the "below the ground" storm sewer portions of the current street projects and the additional $2.00 would fund the curb and gutter of the existing projects. Member Swenson asked clarification if the rates applied to commercial businesses. Engineer Houle said each commercial business was set up differently because of differences in the hard surfaces. Member Housh made a motion approving Ordinance No. 2005 -9, with waiver of second reading as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 2005-9 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. The following described fees of Schedule A to Code Section 185 are amended to read as follows: Page 4 Minutes/Edina City Council/September 6, 2005 Section 2. The effective date of this Ordinance shall be October 31, 2005. ATTEST: City Clerk First Reading: September 6, 2005 Second Reading: Waived Published: September 24, 2005 Member Masica seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Mayor AWARD OF BID APPROVED FOR FIBER OPTIC NETWORK CONSTRUCTION, IMPROVEMENT NO. FO -003 Assistant Manager Anderson indicated Contract No. IT 05 -1, Improvement No. FO -003, covered installation of underground conduits and fiber optic cabling from Edina City Hall to Wooddale and 41s' Street. The project would connect the City of Edina, as a LOGIS member city, with high -speed connections to LOGIS applications, County and State Applications (Police, Dispatch and Assessing) and will manage the increasing demands for bandwidth on the City's internal and external applications, phone and communication systems. Mr. Anderson noted the contract accepted a bid alternate covered by a letter of agreement from St. Louis Park for $12,860.00 of cable that St. Louis Park required to be installed. Member Masica made a motion approving the award of bid for Fiber Optic Network Construction Improvement No. FO -003, to recommended low bidder, Castrejon, Inc., at $112,770.00. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *BID AWARDED FOR BLACKTOP AND CONCRETE - PUBLIC WORKS Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Swenson for award of bid for crushing of blacktop and concrete for the Public Works Department to Minneapolis Concrete Recyclers at $2.95 /ton and not to exceed 11,000 tons of material with a completion date by end of 2005. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP FROM TIME WARNER CABLE TO COMCAST Brian Grogan, Attorney and Administrator from the Southwest Cable Commission, said the issue was the proposed transfer from Time Warner Cable to Comcast Corporation to operate the franchise serving the City of Edina. He shared background on the impending transfer and said the local franchise allowed approval right of transfer as well as looking at state and federal laws for guidance on the issue. The 1997 franchise gave the right to approve any type of proposed transfer or transfer of control. Mr. Grogan said the law states those legal, technical, and financial qualifications of Comcast as well as no on -going franchise violations with the existing operator. Page 5 PURPOSE OF SECTION SUBSECTION FEE /CHARGE AMOUNT 1110 1110.03 Storm Water Drainage $10.74 per quarter Charge pursuant to formula in Subsection 1110.03 Section 2. The effective date of this Ordinance shall be October 31, 2005. ATTEST: City Clerk First Reading: September 6, 2005 Second Reading: Waived Published: September 24, 2005 Member Masica seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Mayor AWARD OF BID APPROVED FOR FIBER OPTIC NETWORK CONSTRUCTION, IMPROVEMENT NO. FO -003 Assistant Manager Anderson indicated Contract No. IT 05 -1, Improvement No. FO -003, covered installation of underground conduits and fiber optic cabling from Edina City Hall to Wooddale and 41s' Street. The project would connect the City of Edina, as a LOGIS member city, with high -speed connections to LOGIS applications, County and State Applications (Police, Dispatch and Assessing) and will manage the increasing demands for bandwidth on the City's internal and external applications, phone and communication systems. Mr. Anderson noted the contract accepted a bid alternate covered by a letter of agreement from St. Louis Park for $12,860.00 of cable that St. Louis Park required to be installed. Member Masica made a motion approving the award of bid for Fiber Optic Network Construction Improvement No. FO -003, to recommended low bidder, Castrejon, Inc., at $112,770.00. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *BID AWARDED FOR BLACKTOP AND CONCRETE - PUBLIC WORKS Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Swenson for award of bid for crushing of blacktop and concrete for the Public Works Department to Minneapolis Concrete Recyclers at $2.95 /ton and not to exceed 11,000 tons of material with a completion date by end of 2005. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP FROM TIME WARNER CABLE TO COMCAST Brian Grogan, Attorney and Administrator from the Southwest Cable Commission, said the issue was the proposed transfer from Time Warner Cable to Comcast Corporation to operate the franchise serving the City of Edina. He shared background on the impending transfer and said the local franchise allowed approval right of transfer as well as looking at state and federal laws for guidance on the issue. The 1997 franchise gave the right to approve any type of proposed transfer or transfer of control. Mr. Grogan said the law states those legal, technical, and financial qualifications of Comcast as well as no on -going franchise violations with the existing operator. Page 5 Minutes/Edina City Council/September 6, 2005 The completed review has come up clean and must register with the Secretary of State. The transaction will not close until after the first quarter of 2006. Member Masica asked at what point in the transaction would the Certificate of Authority come from the Secretary of State. Mr. Grogan said the Resolution required the Certificate be provided each city member on or before closing on March 31, 2006. Mr. Grogan said the criteria for approval was limited. A transfer may be denied under state law if there was a legal, technical or financial reason as it related to Comcast. Mr. Grogan reminded the Council several years ago two companies, Wide Open West and Everest Communications came forward with applications to put fiber optics in the City and provide a competitive choice for cable, internet and telephone service. All the Southwest cities granted them franchises while soon their financing dried up. Member Masica indicated she thought Comcast's assets, divided by their liabilities is below typical investor's standards. Mr. Grogan said federal law allowed financial records review but set no standard on which to base the review. A financial proforma has been requested to identify how Comcast planned to operate the system. Comcast stated they were restricted from providing the requested information because of anti-trust concerns. Member Housh said there have been concerns with Time Warner's service to the City of Edina broadcasting of meetings. He indicated that he wanted assurance of a level of service that met and hopefully exceeds our need. Mr. Grogan said he received a written correspondence from Comcast stating they would not reply to questions. He said the standard of review that he was required to advise the commission of is that 'our consent shall not be unreasonably upheld'. Mr. Grogan reported the Southwest Cable Commission recommended approval of the transfer. Member Hulbert recollected during the Paragon Cable era, there was a public access office in Richfield. She noted a request from a resident was received that there be a public access office in the Edina High School. Mr. Grogan replied in 1997, the five member cities agreed to consolidate access operations to an Eden Prairie studio for joint use. Mayor Hovland reminded the Council and residents in attendance that Member Housh served on the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission on behalf of the City of Edina. Mayor Hovland asked if upon examination of the transfer, Mr. Grogan would support the requested transfer. Mr. Grogan concurred; explaining the transferee and the new franchisee will be operating out of the same holding company operating in the area and were not new to this marketplace. Mayor Hovland asked what the subscribers could do if they were not happy with the service. Mr. Grogan said that both an ordinance and a franchise governed the operation of the cable system which contains customer service requirements that the operator must meet. Programming of cable is governed by the provider. but criteria within the franchise such as installation, etc. can be locally enforced. Member Masica inquired whether data was known on customer satisfaction. Mr. Grogan said he did not have information on customer service. Page 6 Minutes/Edina City Council/September 6; 2005 Lance Leupold, 5728 Abbott Avenue South, Director of Public Affairs and Programming for Time Warner Cable, apologized for the recent problems with cable playback transmission and said with the renovation of the Eden Prairie office, the service level should improve greatly. Director Bennerotte said the City has been working on the playback problems but not all concerns have been resolved. Member Masica voiced concern with customer service by the current Time Warner Cable. Mr. Leupold; said without more information he could not comment on Member Masica's personal concern. Member Masica asked if there were policies in place dealing with customer service. Mr. Leupold replied affirmatively. Member Swenson said when the transfer was complete, what change would Edina's constituents notice. Mr. Leupold said things that may change would be addresses on billing statements and the name on the channels. Emmett Coleman, Area Director of Government Affairs for Comcast, 1667 Beachwood, St. Paul, assured the Council that Comcast was excited to take over the cable operations in Edina and the larger metropolitan market. He said the first thing subscribers could see when the transfer was complete would be on their billing, but should be a seamless transition for all the customers and facilities. Mayor Hovland asked if Comcast intends to discontinue any services. Mr. Coleman said the intent was there being no discontinuation of any specific services with the transfer and the potential was there for more services not less. Mayor Hovland inquired if services had been discontinued in any of the markets. Mr. Coleman indicated that many markets have approved the transfer but until the final transfer Comcast had no control over programming. Mayor Hovland asked . if there were markets in which Time Warner competes with Comcast. Mr. Coleman said presently there are no places where two compete. Resident comments: William Glass, 5721 York Avenue South, asked what the new service will cost. He commented that the cable card he has been issued does not work nor can the technicians or support staff make it work. Mr. Coleman said federal law stated the cable cards were not standard and accessibility varied between television sets. Mr. Coleman said he did not anticipate price increases for cable service following the transfer. Member Swenson made a motion to close the public hearing, seconded by Member Housh. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson asked what the best scenario for the televising of public meetings in Edina. Ms.. Bennerotte said problems have emanated from the encoding process and staff agreed that the best scenario would be that an improperly encoded tape never be aired that Time Warner staff should be checking the tapes before broadcast. Following a brief discussion, Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Member Masica introducing the following resolution and moving its adoption: Page 7 Minutes/Edina City Council/September 6, 2005 RESOLUTION NO. 2005-82 APPROVING THE PROPOSED CHANGE OF CONTROL OF TIME WARNER RECITALS: 1. On or about January 1, 1997, the City of Edina, Minnesota ( "City ") passed and adopted Ordinance No. 1996 -5, granting a Cable Television Franchise ( "Franchise "), currently held by Time Warner Cable Inc. ( "Franchisee "). 2. On or about June 14, 2005, Franchisee submitted to the City FCC Form 394, Application for Franchise Authority Consent to Assignment or Transfer of Control of Cable Television Franchise ( "Form 394 "). 3. Form 394 constitutes Franchisee's application to transfer the system to MOC Holdco II, Inc. which will wholly own Cable Holdco II Inc. ( "Proposed Franchisee "). 4. Pursuant to a Redemption Agreement, dated April 20, 2005, by and among Comcast Cable, Communications Holdings, Inc.; MOC Holdco II, Inc.; TWE Holdings I Trust, TWE Holdings II Trust; Cable Holdco II Inc., Time Warner Cable Inc. and other related parties: (a) the Franchisee cable system and Franchise will be assigned to a wholly -owned subsidiary of Franchisee, Cable Holdco 'II Inc. and (b) immediately thereafter, pursuant to the same Redemption Agreement, all of the stock of Cable Holdco II Inc. will be acquired by MOC Holdco II, Inc., an indirect wholly -owned subsidiary of Comcast Cable Communications Holdings, Inc. The assignment and change of control described herein shall collectively be referred to as the "Transaction." 5. Under the City's Cable Television Regulatory Ordinance ( "Cable Ordinance ") and applicable law, the Transaction requires consent from the City. 6. The City is a member of the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission which has conducted a review of the Transaction and issued a recommendation that the City approve the Transaction subject to the conditions contained herein. 7. The City has reviewed the Transaction and the legal, technical, and financial qualifications of MOC Holdco II, Inc. and its corporate parent entities. 8. Based on information obtained and 'on the reports and information received by City, including the recommendation of the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission, the City has elected to consent to the Transaction. NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Edina, Minnesota hereby resolves as follows: 1. The Franchise is in full force and effect, and Franchisee is the lawful holder of the Franchise. 2. Each of the foregoing recitals are hereby incorporated by reference. 3. The City hereby consents and approves of the Transaction as contemplated under the Redemption Agreement, subject to: a. Closing of the Transaction described in information provided to the City by Franchisee and MOC Holdco II, Inc.. b. MOC Holdco II, Inc., within thirty (30) days of the date of closing, notifying the City in writing of the completion of the Transaction. C. Cable Holdco II Inc., within thirty (30) days of the date of closing, providing the City with a signed acceptance of this Resolution in the form attached hereto and incorporated by reference.. 4. The City hereby waives any right of first refusal which the City may have to purchase the Franchise, or the cable television system serving the City, but only as such right of first refusal applies to the request for approval of the Transaction now before the City. 5. By this consent the City does not make any representation that Franchisee is in compliance with its obligations under the Franchise. Page 8 Minutes/Edina City Council/September 6, 2005 6. By this consent the City does not waive any of Franchisee's commitments, duties and obligations under the Franchise, including any accrued and unfulfilled obligation of the Franchisee, whether known or unknown, relating to the Franchise. 7. In the event the Transaction contemplated under the Redemption Agreement is not completed, for any reason, or is modified in any,,.material manner, the City's consent provided hereunder shall not be effective. Passed and adopted this 61h day of September 2005. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -80 - SAFE AND SOBER GRANT FOR OCTOBER 1, 2005 - SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 Member Housh introduced the following resolution, seconded by Member Swenson and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2005-80 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION' OF AGREEMENT SAFE AND SOBER COMMUNITIES WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, Office of Traffic Safety has awarded the police departments of the Airport; Edina, and Richfield a grant for $32,000 in. a combined joint effort; and WHEREAS, the money will be split equally by the three departments, $10,650 each, which will be used for overtime traffic enforcement efforts and equipment; and WHEREAS, the Airport Police Department will be the lead agency this year in the grant as far as managing the grant funds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina Police Department enter into a grant agreement with the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, Office of Traffic Safety for the project entitled SAFE & SOBER COMMUNITHES during the period from October 1, 2005 through September 30, 2006. BE IT . FURTHER RESOLVED, that Edina Police Chief Michael Siitari is hereby authorized to execute such agreements and amendments as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the Edina Police Department. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Airport Police Chief Mark Rosenow is hereby authorized to be the fiscal agent and administer this grant on behalf of the Edina Police Department. Passed and adopted this 6th day of September, 2005. SPECIAL CONCERN OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL Member Masica said she has a tremendous desire to revisit the Todd Park Hockey Rink decision that was approved at the August 16, 2005, regular Council meeting. She said she believes the decision has put negative feelings between the neighborhood, an athletic association, a park board, City staff and the governing body. She said the vote was taken at a very late hour, and she believed the process should be reopened. Mayor Hovland informed the Council he personally pursued information about temporary boards at the Todd Park Rink rather than the permanent boards that were approved at the August 16, 2005, meeting. He suggested that staff be directed to install and remove the hockey rink at Todd Park on a seasonal basis for the 2005 -2006 and 2006 -2007 seasons and to finalize the assessment in July, 2007. The Park Department assessment should include impact to the neighborhood, level of use of the rink, and the quality of the ice. Mayor Hovland said installing Page 9 Minutes/Edina City Council/September 6, 2005 temporary boards would preserve the green space in the summer and the hockey rink will have a beautiful warming house in the winter. Member Swenson indicated as the maker of the original motion she would concur but would want data on how the temporary boards fared with the taking down/ putting up process. Member Housh noted he believed installing temporary boards at Todd Park was worth investigating. He added reopening the hearing would serve no purpose. Member Hulbert said this was a bad solution and would only set up a wound that would not heal for two years. Putting off a decision for two years sets up neighborhood warfare and she said she would rather reopen the hearing and make a final decision. Member Housh said he felt the art of government was to find solutions that both sides can accept. He concluded he is happy with the alternative as proposed. Member Masica suggested a moratorium be imposed in order to keep the number of rinks at eleven. Member Swenson inquired why a moratorium would be needed if there was no money to build another rink. Member Masica said it would be an assurance to the community that before a rink was proposed, a master plan would be in place. Mayor Hovland said the biggest complaint about the rink was the loss of green space. Temporary boards would to alleviate that complaint. He believed a moratorium was not necessary for the community's greater good as well as he does not agree with a rehearing of the issue. Member Masica asked what the conditi on of the grass would be in summertime when the boards were removed. Mr. Keprios said it would gradually get green, with clover and weeds being the predominant groundcover. Mayor Hovland said the base bid for the temporary boards was at $20,900, without labor. Mr. Keprios said the costs would be higher than what was currently in the operating budget but staff can come up with a recommendation that will work. Member Hulbert encouraged the Council to make a decision and not put things off. Member Swenson made a motion to amend the motion from the regular meeting of the City Council on August 16, 2005, to direct staff to install and remove the hockey rink at Todd Park on a seasonal basis for the 2005 -2006 season and the 2006 -2007 season with an assessment to be. completed by July 1, 2007, as to the appropriateness of continuing the rink_ at that location. Member Housh seconded the motion. Member Masica said she supported the Mayor's suggestion of the temporary boards at Todd Park but she would not support the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Swenson, Hovland Nays: Hulbert, Masica Page 10 Minutes/Edina City Council/September 6, 2005 Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2005-83 APPROVING CONVEYANCE OF PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY FOR HAUGLAND DEVELOPMENT Member Swenson introduced the following resolution, and moved adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -83 A RESOLUTION CONVEYING CERTAIN PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY PROPERTY TO 5000 FRANCE COMPANY NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, that the following described real property is hereby authorized to be conveyed to 5000 France Company from the City of . Edina subject to reservation of easements for existing utilities and rights -of -way: PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO BE CONVEYED: The east 101.42 feet of the south 7.00 feet of the north 10.00 feet of the south 193.00 feet of Lot 45, Auditor's Subdivision No. 172, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Passed and adopted this 61h day of September, 2005. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica; Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *HEARING DATE SET OF OCTOBER 18, 2005, FOR 2005 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Swenson setting October 18, 2005, as hearing date for 2005 Special Assessments: Maintenance Improvement No. M -05 - 50th & France Avenue Business District; Maintenance Improvement No. G -05 - Grandview Business District, Roadway Improvement No.. A -202 - Halifax and Grimes Neighborhood Reconstruction, Roadway Improvement No. A -205 - Wooddale Avenue from Valley View Road to West 56th Street, Roadway Improvement No. BA -321 - Valley View Road from West 64th Street to Wooddale Avenue; Tree Removal Improvement No. TR -05; Aquatic Weeds Improvement No. AQ -05 Arrowhead And Indianhead Lakes And Minnehaha Creek Mill Pond, and Weed Mowing Improvement No. WD -05; Improvement No. HDIS05; Improvement No. HREM05; Improvement No. FEN -05. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING CONTRACT EXTENSION APPROVED Manager Hughes elaborated that for the past several years, Allied Waste Services has held the recycling contract in the City. They proposed a three year extension of the recycling contract which was reviewed by the Recycling Commission. The Commission recommended a one year extension of the contract. Allied has proposed a two year extension of the contract with exactly the same price and with the same revenue sharing as in the 2005 contract. Mr. Hughes said staff believed that is an excellent price as compared to other cities. Mr. Hughes said Allied was proposing that during the contract term, a pilot program would be conducted in a portion of the City dealing with single -sort recycling. He explained single -sort recycling was a way to collect recyclables using a cart instead of bin. Residents would not have to sort the paper items from the rigid items, as has currently been done. The cart was then dumped into a collection truck by an automated arm and materials would be taken to a recycling facility. Page 11 Minutes/Edina City Council/September 6, 2005 Mr. Hughes recommended approval of the extension of the residential contract with Allied Waste Services for recycling collection through 2007. Member Swenson asked why the collection of yard waste was not at the curb. Recycling Coordinator Wilmot said since garbage containers were left at the garage, similar yard waste containers must, per City Code, be left at the garage and not curbside. Member 'Masica inquired how the pilot program would select its sample residents and when the program would begin. Ms. Wilmot said she will work with BFI to ensure an accurate sampling, adding that the pilot program pick -up would be every other week. Member Housh asked how long the City. has been receiving a rebate on recycling services. Ms. Wilmot said the one year contract was negotiated in 2004 for 2005. Member Housh asked who receives the rebate. Ms. Wilmot said residential rates for 2006 will be reduced. Rich Herstein, Minnesota Marketing Manager for BFI, 4218 Red Oak Lane, Chanhassen, thanked staff for the opportunity to work with the City and the recycling program. Member Housh made a motion approving the residential recycling contract as presented with Allied Waste Services (formerly Browning Ferris Industries (BFI) of Minnesota) for recycling collection through 2007. Member Masica seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -78 - SPECIAL ASSESSMENT SENIOR DEFERRAL PROGRAM Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Swenson introduced- Resolution No. 2005 -78 the Special Assessment Senior Deferral Program and moving approval: RESOLUTION NO. 2005-78 AUTHORIZING SPECIAL ASSESSMENT SENIOR DEFERRAL PROGRAM WHEREAS, by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193 through 435.195, the City is authorized and empowered to defer the payment of special assessments against homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older or retired by virtue of a permanent and total disability for whom payment of such special assessment would be a hardship; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina deems it desirable and in the best interests of the City of Edina and its citizens to implement such authority and power by establishing standards, guidelines and procedures for the granting and processing of such deferments; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the following standards, guidelines and procedures are hereby established and adopted: ELIGIBILITY STANDARDS • The applicant must be 65 years of age or older or retired by virtue of a permanent and total disability, and • The applicant must be the fee simple owner of the property or must be a contract vendee for fee simple ownership, and Page 12 Minutes/Edina City Council/September 6, 2005 • The property for which deferment is requested must be classified and taxed as homestead. property by the City Assessor as of the date the application for deferment is made, and • The first year's installment of the proposed special assessment must, either alone or in the aggregate with installments of other special assessments due against the property and payable in the first year of the proposed assessment, total more than two percent of the applicant's total household income as defined by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 290A. INTEREST RATE • Any special assessment deferred pursuant to this policy shall bear interest at the prevailing interest rate applicable at the time the assessment was originally levied. TERMINATION • 'Special Assessment payments deferred pursuant to the eligibility, requirements set forth by. this policy shall become payable effective upon the occurrence of one of the following events: • The subject property is sold, transferred, subdivided, or in any way conveyed to another by the fee owner qualified for deferral status. • The death of the fee owner qualified for deferral status unless a surviving joint tenant, tenant in common, or contract vendee is eligible for the deferral benefit provided hereunder. • The property loses its homestead status for any reason. • The City council determines that there would be no hardship to require an immediate or partial payment of the deferred special assessment. PROCEDURES • The applicant for deferment must file a completed application and affidavit with the City Assessor on or before November 15th of the year preceding the year for which deferral status is requested in order to implement the deferral program for said year. • All applications for deferment shall be made on forms prepared and supplied by Hennepin. County and the City of Edina. • The City Assessor shall include in any and all mailed notices of public hearings with respect to special assessments, a statement explaining the deferment policy hereby adopted. • The City Assessor shall transmit all deferments granted pursuant to this policy to the Hennepin County Auditor for recording with the Office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota, so as to give notice of such deferment to all future owners and encumbrancers of the property for which a deferment has been granted. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council shall not be prohibited from determining that a hardship exists, and that a deferment should be granted on the above terms and conditions, even if the eligibility requirements are not met by an applicant, provided that the Council finds that: • There are exceptional and unusual circumstances not covered by the foregoing standards and guidelines, and • If granted, the deferment will have been made in a non - discriminatory manner, and • The granting of the deferment will not give the applicant an unreasonable preference over other applicants. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that failure of the City to give notice. pursuant to this policy or the granting or denial of any deferment shall not invalidate any special assessment otherwise made and levied by the City of Edina pursuant to applicable statutory requirements. Page 13 Minutes/Edina City Council/September 6, 2005 Motion carried on rollcall vote- five ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -79 SETTING HEARING DATE OF OCTOBER 4, 2005, FOR ALLEY VACATION, INDIANOLA AND 50TH STREET Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Swenson introducing the following resolution and moving its adoption: RESOLUTION NO.2005 -79 CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF ALLEY VACATION 501h AND INDIANOLA BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina as follows: 1. It is hereby found and determined that the following described property should be considered for vacation in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 160.29 and 462.348, Subd. 7: 2. This Council shall meet at 7:00 P.M. on the 0h of October 2005, for the purpose of holding a public hearing on whether such vacation shall be made. in the interest of the public. 3. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause notice of said hearing to be published once a week for two weeks in the Edina Sun - Current, the official newspaper of the City, to post such notice, in at least three public and conspicuous places, as provided in Minnesota Statutes. Such notice shall be in substantially the following form: (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF PUBLIC ALLELY 50TH STREET AND INDIANOLA AVENUE IN THE CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota will meet on October 4, 2005, at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers at 4801 West 50th Street for an alley right of way easement to be vacated: PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY TO BE VACATED: The vacation of the alley lying southerly of the south line of Lot Two (2) and Lot Three (3), Block One (1), "Stevens 1st Addition to Minneapolis ", Hennepin County, Minnesota, and lying northerly of the north line of Lot Four (4), said Block One (1) and its easterly extension, and lying westerly of the plat of HENLEY ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and lying easterly of Indianola Avenue. All persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether or not the above proposed street right of way and utility and drainage vacation is in the public interest and should be made shall be heard at said time and place. The Council shall consider the extent to which such proposed street vacation affects existing easements within the area of the proposed vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric, telephone or cable television poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto, for the purpose of specifying, in any such vacation resolution, the extent to which any or all of such easement, and such authority to maintain, and to enter upon the area of the proposed vacation, shall continue. Page 14 Minutes/Edina City Council/September 6, 2005 BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Dated: September 6, 2005 Passed and adopted this 6th day of September 2005. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED VISIONING PARTNERSHIP PRESENTED Michael Wyatt, Minnehaha . Creek Watershed District ,Planner indicated the Visioning Partnership Purpose for the District was, 'Develop a set of recommendations for the long -term management of Minnehaha Creek which incorporated local landowner and citizen user input related to values associated with the creek'. He shared the hierarchy of goal - setting, management strategies and the process for levels of 'involvement. Mr. Wyatt said the Citizens Advisory Committee recommended the overall vision for Minnehaha Creek including both an existing and desired sense of place as the creek was: ,1) a corridor with various reaches and destinations, 2) serving as a gathering place for people, 3) providing recreational opportunities, 4) a contemporary cultural resource and reflects our history, and 5) providing natural and aesthetic experiences unique to its setting. Mr. Wyatt said within the creek corridor, it was also desired to: 1) providing balanced opportunities to experience the creek, 2) improve the natural environment, 3) improve water quality, 4) have variation and physical differences, and 5) be reflective of our history and a priority for our future. Jack Sullivan, 5808 Beard Avenue south, volunteer on the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, commented that the visioning and goals proved to him the importance of the Creek and its partnership with all residents. Jeff Ryan, 4805 Sunnyside Road, said everyone wants cleaner water, better access for recreation, reduction in damage due to erosion, an increase in wild life, and more green space but for a different use. He encouraged approval of the resolutions as presented. Following a brief Council discussion, Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson introducing the following resolution and moving its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2005-76 CREATING A MINNEHAHA CREEK VISIONING PARTNERSHIP WHEREAS, Minnehaha Creek is a highly valued stream flowing from Lake Minnetonka to the Mississippi River; and WHEREAS, the preservation and enhancement of the Minnehaha Creek Corridor is a high - priority expressed in the comprehensive plans for each of the cities along the Creek, and the Water Resources Management Plan of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District; and WHEREAS, urbanization' in the Minnehaha Creek Watershed has led to the degradation of the stream's flow regime, habitat and water quality, but the Creek has high potential for restoration; and WHEREAS, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District completed in 2003 a detailed Hydrologic/Hydraulic and Pollutant Loading Study, and a Minnehaha Creek Stream Assessment, and WHEREAS the MCWD will undertake revisions to its Watershed Management Plan in partnership with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Feasibility Study to explore the potential Page 15 Minutes/Edina City Council/September 6, 2005 federal interest for Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration and Flood Damage Reduction in the Minnehaha Creek Corridor; WHEREAS, the City of Edina desires to partner with the other communities along the Creek to seek protection and improvement of the Minnehaha Creek Corridor, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Edina supports the formation of a partnership to provide guidance and recommendations on policy development, technical issues, and public involvement to create a common vision and coordinated recommendation for the Minnehaha Creek Corridor, to be organized as follows: 1.' Partnership Composition The partnership will comprise the following partners: • City of Minnetonka; • City of Hopkins; • City of St. Louis Park; • City of Edina; • City of Minneapolis; . • Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board, • Hennepin County; and • Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 2. Policy Board a. The partnership Policy Board will comprise a member of the governing body of each of the partner organizations. b. The Policy Board will generally meet quarterly as needed and pursuant to an established project schedule and work plan. 3. Technical Advisory Committee a. The Technical Advisory Committee will provide technical review and recommendations to the partnership and will comprise a staff representative from each of the partner organizations, and a representative from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Minnesota Department of Health and such other governmental agencies having a technical interest and expertise to offer for the benefit of the Minnehaha Creek Corridor. b. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District technical representative will serve as the Chair of the Technical Advisory Committee. c. The Technical Advisory Committee will generally meet monthly as needed pursuant to the established project work schedule and work plan. 4. Public Advisory Committee a. The Public. Advisory Committee will comprise two citizen representatives designated by each partner organization, and up to seven other representatives of stakeholder organizations named by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to represent conservation, property owner, development, and recreational interests in the Minnehaha Creek Watershed appointed by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed through an open application process. b. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District will designate one of its Board Members to serve as Chair to the Public Advisory Committee. c. The Public Advisory Committee will generally meet monthly as needed pursuant to the established project schedule and work plan. 5. Legal Authority Page 16 Minutes/Edina City Council/September 6, 2005 It is understood that the decisions and activities of the partnership are advisory only, and will not have any binding legal authority on any of the partnership's members. The parties to the partnership expect that recommendations developed and approved by the partnership will be duly considered and acted upon by the governing body of the respective the partnership members. 6. Term The partnership will meet .and work for an initial period of three (3) years, concluding on or before March 1, 2007, subject to a determination to renew the work 'of the partnership by each of its partner organizations Passed and adopted this 61h day of September 2005. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Hulbert made a motion, seconded by member Housh introducing the following resolution and moving its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2005-77 ADOPTING MINNEHAHA CREEK VISION Whereas, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and City of Edina previously adopted a resolution to create the Minnehaha Creek Visioning Partnership to provide guidance and recommendations on policy development, technical issues, and public involvement to create a common vision and implementation plan for the Minnehaha Creek Corridor; Whereas, the Partnership's Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC), comprised of 23 representatives from the cities of Minneapolis, Edina, St. Louis Park, Hopkins and Minnetonka, the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board, Hennepin County, and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, held twelve workshop meetings to develop a' recommended creek vision; Whereas, the Partnership's Technical Advisory Committee also met to review the technical feasibility of the vision recommendations developed by the CAC, and has concluded that these recommendations are technically feasible; Whereas, the CAC also convened a public Open House to gather further public input and review of the proposed creek vision and the CAC's recommendations; Whereas, the CAC has now produced a detailed report that sets forth a creek vision as follows: The Vision for Minnehaha Creek includes both an existing and desired sense of place. With respect to the existing sense of place, the creek: ■ Is a corridor with various reaches and destinations, ■ Serves as a gathering place for people, ■ Provides recreational opportunities, ■ Is a contemporary cultural resource, yet it also reflects our history, and . ■ Provides natural and aesthetic experiences unique to its setting. Within the creek corridor it is also desired to: ■ Provide balanced opportunities to experience the creek, ■ Improve the natural environment, ■ Improve water quality, ■ Have variation and physical differences, and ■ Be reflective of our history and a priority for our future. Whereas, the CAC's creek vision recommendations also include management priorities, streambank erosion improvements, aquatic habitat management, riparian vegetation Page 17 Minutes/Edina City Council/September 6, 2005 management, woody debris management, study of weir and dam removal, stream flow management, water quality management, and decision making criteria; and Whereas, the CAC's creek vision recommendations will be considered by both the MCWD and the USACE as they move forward with plans and designs, and it is also intended as guidance for other organizations, such as cities and the Minneapolis Park Board, which share creek corridor management responsibilities, with the hope is that all organizations can work together toward a common vision for the creek, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that ' the City of Edina hereby adopts the general creek vision recommendations presented by the CAC as the general conceptual framework to guide creek corridor management, and thanks the 23 citizen members of the CAC for their hard.work, thorough study, and carefully- considered recommendations; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Edina supports the inclusion of these recommendations in the Water Resources Management Plan being developed by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Edina agrees to continue to work with the other members of the Minnehaha Creek Visioning Partnership, through its policy board, technical advisory committee, and citizens advisory committee, to coordinate the implementation of these recommendations, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Edina hereby expresses its support for the United States Army Corps of Engineers Feasibility Study within the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to pursue the investigation of the potential Federal interest in assisting with the implementation of Minnehaha Creek Visioning Partnership recommendations in the Minnehaha Creek corridor. Passed this 6th day of September, 2005. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland. Motion carried. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Member Housh made a motion and Member Swenson seconded the motion approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated August 17, 2005, and .consisting of 32 pages: General Fund $172,324.14; Communications Fund $14,795.96; Working Capital Fund $152,927.77; Construction Fund $355,610.12; Art Center Fund $11,375.29; Golf Dome Fund $54.01; Aquatic Center Fund $18,619.50; Golf Course Fund $16,585.12; Ice Arena Fund $45,337.69; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $13,496.47; Liquor Fund $137,191.50; Utility Fund $624,392.54; Storm Sewer Fund $29,482.06; Recycling fund $33,874.00; PSTF Agency Fund $4,166.59, TOTAL $1,630,232.76; and for approval of payment of claims dated August 24, 2005, and consisting of 32 pages: General Fund $79,226.83; CDBG Fund $9,495.10; Communications Fund $12,793.59; Working Capital Fund $99,583.84; Art Center Fund $8,661.78; Golf Dome Fund $2,311.05; Aquatic Center Fund $3,112.55; Golf Course Fund $42,263.62; Ice Arena Fund $1,891.20, Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $5,024.47; Liquor Fund $139,329.98; Utility Fund $43,965.07; Storm Sewer Fund $188.08; PSTF Agency Fund $290.88; TOTAL $448,138.04; and for approval of payment of claims dated August 31, 2005, and consisting of 31 pages: General Fund $324,355.26; Communications Fund $1,716.40, Working Capital Fund $58,641.26; Construction Fund $2,286.12; Art Center Fund $1,820.47; Golf Dome Fund $1,238.68; Aquatic Center Fund $1,448.51; Golf Course Fund $23,420.22; Ice Arena Fund $1,190.60; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $25,572.99; Liquor Fund $171,795.91; Utility Fund $32,066.34; Storm Sewer Fund $20,121.20; PSTF Agency Fund $210.82; TOTAL $665,884.78. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. Page 18 Minutes/Edina Citv Council/Sevtember 6.2005 RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -74 APPROVED SETTING MAXIMUM TAX LEVIES Manager Hughes recommended adoption of Resolution No. 2005 -74, setting the maximum proposed 2006 tax levies of $18,560,151 for the General Fund, $1,081,536 for the debt service of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority Public Project Revenue Bonds Series 2002 (year 5 of City Hall debt service levy), $159,100 for debt service of equipment certificates of indebtedness, and $420,205 for the debt service of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority Public Project Revenue Bonds Series 2005A (year 1 of Gymnasium debt service levy). The total market value based referendum levy would be set at $599,138. Following a Council discussion, Member Swenson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO.-2005 - 74 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING PROPOSED BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF EDINA FOR YEAR 2006, AND ESTABLISHING THE PROPOSED TAX LEVY PAYABLE IN 2006 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The Budget for the City of Edina for calendar year 2006, is hereby proposed as follows: TOTAL GENERAL FUND $ 25,367,595 Section 2: Estimated receipts other than General Tax Levy are hereby proposed as follows: TOTAL ESTIMATED RECEIPTS $ 6,817,222 Section 3. That there is proposed to be levied upon all taxable real and personal' property in,the City of Edina, a tax rate sufficient to produce the amount as follows: FOR GENERAL FUND $18,550,373 Section 4. That there is proposed to be levied upon all taxable real and personal property in the City of Edina, a tax rate sufficient to produce the amount as follows: FOR DEBT SERVICE OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PUBLIC PROJECT REVENUE BONDS - SERIES 2002 $ 1,081,536 Section 5. That there is proposed to be levied upon all taxable real and personal property in the City of Edina, a tax rate sufficient to produce the amount as follows: FOR DEBT SERVICE OF CERTIFICATES OF INDEBTEDNESS $ 159,100 Section 6. That there is proposed to be levied upon all taxable real and personal property in the City of Edina, a tax rate sufficient to produce the amount as follows: FOR DEBT SERVICE OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PUBLIC PROJECT REVENUE BONDS SERIED 2005A $ 419,000 Approved this 6th day of September, 2005. Member Hulbert seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 19 Minutes/Edina City Council/September 6, 2005 TRUTH IN TAXATION HEARING DATE SET Mr. Hughes recommended that Monday, December 5, 2005, at- 5:00 P.M. be set. for Truth in Taxation initial hearing; 'and Monday, December 12, 2005, at 5:00 P.M. be set for the continuation hearing; and Tuesday, December 20, 2005, be set for the budget adoption hearing. He reminded the Council that few dates are available by law for setting the truth in taxation hearing dates. Member Masica made a motion setting Monday, December 5, 2005, as hearing date for Truth in Taxation initial hearing and setting Monday, December 12, 2005, as continuation Truth in Taxation hearing date and budget adoption on December 20, 2005, at 7:00 P.M. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *RESOLUTION NO 2005 -75 SETTING HEARING DATE SET OF OCTOBER 4, 2005 FOR ISSUANCE OF BONDS BY MINNEAPOLIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY - SOUTHDALE YMCA Member Housh introduced the following resolution, seconded by Member Swenson and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION 2005 -75 SET HEARING DATE OF OCTOBER 4, 2005, FOR REVENUE BOND FINANCING FOR YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION (YMCA) OF METROPOLITAN MINNEAPOLIS WHEREAS, The Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Minneapolis (the "Corporation "), intends to provide for the financing of equipment and the improvement of various administrative office, community program and health enhancement facilities in the cities of New Hope, Minneapolis, Andover, Edina and Minnetonka (collectively the "Project "), through a revenue bond in the amount of up to $5,000,000 (the "Bond ") to be issued by the Minneapolis Community Development Agency (the "Issuer "); and WHEREAS, because one of the facilities to be financed is located in the City of Edina (the "City"), it is necessary for the City to hold a public -hearing and then approve the issuance of the Bond by the Issuer, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. The City Council shall hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. central time on Tuesday, October 4, 2005, at the Council Chambers in City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota, to provide an opportunity for interested individuals to express their views on the proposed issuance of the Bond and the nature of the Project. The City Clerk shall cause a notice of public hearing in substantially the form attached as Exhibit A to be published in the official newspaper of the City no fewer than fourteen (14) and no more than thirty (30) days before the hearing. EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSED PROJECT AND THE ISSUANCE OF A REVENUE BOND TO FINANCE VARIOUS YMCA FACILITIES Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City") will meet on Tuesday, October 4, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers in the City Hall, located at 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota, for the purpose of conducting a public hearing on a proposal by The Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Minneapolis (the "Corporation ") that the City approve the issuance by the Minneapolis Community Page 20 Minutes/Edina Citv Council/Sevtember 6, 2005 Development Agency (the "Issuer ") of a revenue bond in the approximate amount of $5,000,000 (the "Bond "), to finance a project more fully described below, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 through 409.165 (the "Act "). The project includes various construction, renovation, equipment and related costs incurred or to be incurred by the Corporation with respect to various administrative office, community program and health enhancement facilities located at the following addresses: 30 S. Ninth Street, Minneapolis; 2125 E. Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis; 4 W. Rustic Lodge, Minneapolis; 3335 Blaisdell Avenue S., Minneapolis; 4100 28th Avenue S., Minneapolis; 1711 West Broadway, Minneapolis; 1801 University Avenue S.E., Minneapolis; 2304 Jackson Street N.E., Minneapolis; 15200 Hanson Boulevard, Andover; 7601 42nd Avenue, New Hope; 12301 Ridgedale Drive, Minnetonka; and 7355 York Avenue S., Edina:' The amount of the Bond proceeds to be expended on the facility in Edina will not exceed $1,000,000. The Bond and interest thereon shall not be payable from nor charged against any funds of the City or the Issuer other than revenue pledged for the payment thereof, nor shall the City or the Issuer be subject to any liability thereon. No holders of the obligations shall ever have the right to compel any exercise'of the taxing power of'the City or the Issuer to pay the obligations or the interest thereon, nor to enforce payment against any property of the City or the Issuer. Such obligations shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City or the Issuer, nor shall the same constitute a debt of the City or the Issuer within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitations. All persons interested may appear and be heard at the time and place set forth above or may submit written comments in advance of the hearing. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *PETITION RECEIVED FOR STREET LIGHTING ON SOUTH KNOLL DRIVE Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Swenson accepting a petition from Ann Moore, 6220, South Knoll Drive, requesting street lighting on South Knoll Drive between Knoll Drive and South Knoll Drive, and referring the petition .to Engineering for processing as to feasibility. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *PETITION RECEIVED FOR STREET RECONSTRUCTION ON DEVER DRIVE, PARK PLACE AND WOODCREST DRIVE Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member, Swenson accepting a petition from James Angelle, 5501 Park Place, requesting street reconstruction on Dever Drive, Park Place and Woodcrest Drive, and referring the petition to Engineering for processing as to feasibility. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. MEETING WITH LEGISLATIVE DELEGATION SCHEDULED Following a brief Council discussion, November 15, 2005, was tentatively set for a meeting with the Legislators at 5:00 P.M. at Edina City Hall. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 10:38 P.M. City Clerk Page 21 1 • w91N�,j� •rN , e �• REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Craig Larsen City Planner Date: September 20, 2005 Subject: Final Development Plan Gramercy Club of Edina 5101 70,n Street West Recommendation: Agenda Item: II. A Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA .0 To Council Action: ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion The Planning Commission recommends Final Development Plan approval subject to: 1. Revisions to landscaping plan 2. Watershed District Permits Information /Background: See attached Planning Commission Minutes. The developer will have a revised landscaping plan to present at the Council hearing. The Original application included a Plat that would replat the existing parcels into a single parcel. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Plat. However, notice of the hearing omitted any reference to the Plat. Consequently, we are required to republish and hold the public hearing on the Plat on October 4, 2005 1 ;1 ,.A Commissioner Lonsbury said in his opinion the Ci should take a careful look at is site, acknowledging the redevelopment pot tial of the site, while ensuring site is redeveloped correctly. Commissi er Lonsbury said he understands om the proponent that at this time the roponent is only beginning the discussion; wever, the Commission has a pl n before them that needs some form of acti Mr. Larsen said a Commission can gr nt the proponent-an open ended extension allowing them t eturn at their lei re or not al all. f Commissioner Brown as d Mr. G dermary f his intention is to have the Commission act on the submitted me epot proposal Mr: Gelderman responded the intent this evening is egin discussion. ,Mr. Geldgrman reiterated their firm was approached ome Depot and,at this time his firm as no intention of moving forward with a Ho a Depot proposal. Mr. Gelderman said the discussion this evening is inform 'C93nmission here is interest in redeveloping this site and our de re to continu._ _discussion with the City of Edina on what is the best use of this si ? Chair Byron asked Mr elderman if the Comm ion can continue this discussion with your conse . Mr. Gelderman responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Lo bury moved/to continue this discussion with the consent of the propone to no date specific. Commissioner McClelland seconded the motion. All voted eye; motion carried. P -05--5 /" Tim Nichols The .Gramercy Club of Edina 5101 7.01 Street West Mr. Larsen asked the Commission to recall that several proposals to redevelop this site were considered in 2004. The City approved a 117 -unit building with the intent at that time to have two building, under separate ownership; one would be /rental and the other condominium. Following all City approval the property was sold to a third party. The new owner does not intend to develop the site as approved. Mr. Larsen explained the new plans include a 4 story 128 unit co -op. The units range in size from 970 to 2,000 square feet. The plans indicate 190 parking 3 spaces in the garage area and 36 surface spaces. The plans comply with garage space requirements but do not meet the surface parking requirements. Mr. Larsen concluded staff believes it is extremely important to the quality of the overall development that the entire site is now under a single owner. Staff recommends approval of the proposed Final Development Plan and plat, including the requested variances. Conditions of approval are: Agreement to grant easement for intersection improvements (possible eft-turning movement), Watershed District permits and staff approval of revised landscap7 plan and schedule. `. The proponent, Mr. Nichols and his developmenf'a�r Dena Meyer, Link Wilson and Aardvid Gottemukkula, were present to tespoyid to questions. Commissioner Grabiel asked Mr. Larsen the numbeirof units in the previous building(s). Mr. Larsen responded the original building that was destroyed by fire contained 60 units. The Commission and Couri id ,approved two buildings with a total of 117 units to replace the original building. ? Commissioner Brown said he is delighted this site is now under one owner. He told the Commission he drives by this site on a reWlar basis and is curious why this type of development (senior co-op) doesn't require as much surface parking as the more traditional,condominium development. Mr. Larsen responded it could be possible our surface parking requipement is on the high side for this type of development,; adding he would def9ito the proponent to address co -op surface parking needs. Concluding., Commissioner Brown pointed out this site offers no on- street parking, and if the need arose for more surface parking there is no. where to add additional parking. Mr. Larsen acknowledged that point. i CoTrriissioner Workinger questioned if subsidized units would be a part of this proposal. He noted when redevelopment of this site was heard and approved approval included a set, number of affordable housing units. Commissioner Workinger asked if that approval transfers the affordable housing component to this project. Mr. Larsen responded affordable units are not part of this equation. Those units were lost when ownership changed. Commissioner Workinger said he is.uneasy Igosing those units. He pointed out before the fire destroyed the original building units in that building were affordable, adding in reality 60 affordable housing units have been lost in the City. Commissioner McClelland questioned what would happen if the building changed ownership - would there be enough parking to support a more traditional condo use? Continuing, Commissioner McClelland asked if the proposal meets the City's lot coverage requirements. She pointed out the site contains ponding and little green area. Mr. Larsen responded the site complies 4 with lot coverage requirements. Mr. Larsen said in response to the building no longer being used as a co -op he has no response to that. Chair Byron asked Mr. Nichols to explain to the Commission the proposed co -op concept. Mr. Nichols, 12750 Nicollet Ave, Burnsville, addressed the Commission stating he has been looking for an opportunity to develop -in, Edina for some time and is every excited that opportunity presented itself. Mr. Nichol said the proposal is a limited equity product that develops gramercy park and gramercy club facilities. Gramercy Club is occupied by active'seniors 55 +. The units range in size from 900 + square feet to 2,400 square feet. /,Individual units are, owned through a cooperative association. Continuing, I�Ar. Nichols said he hao had great success with this type of concept, adding he has been involved in ,pVer 30 similar developments since in 1989. Mr. Nichols added all have been very well received, and currently all have wait lists. Mr., I chols explained the "club" concept could be considered a community of active seni or a (55+ linked to the larger community. He said this facility will be developed with common areas, swimming pool, virtual golf, fitness center, library, guest suites and many other community based amenities. Mr. Nichols told the Commission a number of units are pre -sold. With interest already mounting forthisproject. Commissioner McClelland 'questioned the co -op concept and how the units are sold, adding she is familiar. with the Nevi- York concept where unit owners oversee and approve potential owners. Mr. Ni c ols responded our facilities operate democratically. There is a board_ofAlrectors that would oversee the by -laws, etc. Continuing, Mr. Nichols explained they have an operational framework concept -that has worked very well in the past and continues to work efficiently. Individual units are sold to people that qualify under our financial guidelines. Ownership in a sense is based pn the ability to pay. Continuing, Mr. Nichols sa4`fheir co -op framework was based on the 7500 York co-op. Mr. Nichols old the Commission the co -op on 7500 York was the first senior co -op in the country. Commissioner McClelland asked if there would be a waiting list to pgrchase a,unit when one becomes available. Mr. Nichols responded there will be awaiting list, which is presently how the Gramercy co -ops are resold. Mr. Wilson addressed the Commission informing them in the near future the Washington Post will be /running an article on senior developments highlighting Mr. Nichols and his successful senior developments in Minnesota. Continuing, Mr. Wilson said in response to comments on affordable housing that there are affordable units (smaller units) by Edina standards in this development, with a monthly association fee of $350.00. Mr. Wilson explained there are changes from the previous plan submitted by the Bernardi brothers. The biggest change is that the site will now only have one structure on it. Located in the center of the proposed building are all the amenities; swimming pool, fitness area, office space, business center and library. The exterior materials are brick y u hardy stucco finished panels which are superior to efis. The exterior materials for the Bernardi plan was rock face block. Mr. Wilson said he believes the proposed exterior will look very good. He added the look will be similar to the Stephen Scott development, Cornelia Place. Concluding, Mr. Wilson said landscaping is very important to this project and we will work with staff to ensure proper landscaping is implemented. Mr. Wilson added the berm along West 70th Street will be retained and also planted with additional landscaping Commissioner Workinger questioned if traffic flow was reviewed by the Engineering Department. Mr. Larsen responded it'was reviewed:, Commissioner Workinger said he noticed there may be some intersection reconfiguration in the future. Mr. Larsen responded that is a possibility, adding:he�believes the developer has the right to know there may be reconstru*n of they intersection in the future. Commissioner Workinger questioned if reconfiguration of the intersection would have any impact on the surface parfcing s{Zaces. Mr.'Larsen responded there would be no impact. Commissioner Lonsbury noted the 7500 York co -op has been mentioned and asked Mr. Larsen if he knew the number of units and surface 9arking spaces at 7500 York. Mr. Larsen responded 7504 -York is a large.complex with 335 -338 units. Mr. Larsen said at this time he doesn't know the amount of surface parking spaces on that site, adding he has been there often, and if hp/remembers correctly there didn't appear to be that,rnany. Commissioner Lonsbury agreed, adding his mother lives at 7500 York and when visiting her he has never had a problem parking. Commissioner Onsbury suggested that Mr. Larsen find out the exact number of surface spaces at 7500 York to, ,draw some parallel, and pass that information on to the Council. \,.Commissioner Losnbury stated this is a final development plan, with everything rolled into one and also suggested to the developer that they bnng,to the Council samples of the exterior building materials. He said at least to him it is difficu)t to envision what something will look like fr9rn a colored rendering. Mr.,Wilson responded he would be very happy to,do that. Commissioner Lonsbury thanked Mr. Nichols and pointed out this building is being constructecl,in a very prominent busy location and it should be developed taking that into consideration. Mr. Nichols said he agrees this building is located in an area of high visibility, adding when formulating the plans for the exterior materials they were hyper cognizant, and want this development to stand the test oftime. i Commissioner Schroeder asked for clarification on the plans. He said there is a path from the building leading to West 70th. Street and questioned its purpose. Mr. Nichols responded the path doesn't really lead to anything but the public sidewalk. Mr. Nichols said Edina code requires that all exit stairways must provide access to the nearest public way. He explained this stairway will not be used often - only on an emergency basis. Mr. Nichols added the pathway will be maintained by the association. Continuing, Commissioner Schroeder stated at least in his opinion, the plans aren't clear enough with regard to the berm and landscaping. Mr. Nichols said the berm depicted on the plans is an existing berm and that berm will be re- landscaped. Commissioner Schroeder commented the proposed building isn't a bad looking building, however, the mass of the structure (north elevation) will be very apparent from the residential homes on West 70th Street. Commissioner Schroeder said that building wall may have the appearance of a large mass of sameness. Commissioner Schroeder added this is just his opinion, but the north elevation lacks variety.,, Commissioner Workinger stated he agrees,with the comment from Commissioner Schroeder regarding the north elevation: -,He added that wall expanse will be fairly imposing, suggesting that the,'rriass could be diffused with additional and more substantial plantings. Continuing, C�mnriissioner\Workinger questioned how the City can attract moderate and low income people to a r development like this. He pointed out the City's\ prior approach was tQ includer' affordable housing in our motion. Commissioner Workinger stated the City should make every effort to provide affordable fibgsingvhen it is eliminated (for redevelopment). Mr. Nichols reiterated to the best of hiss kriowled& at least three (3) of the Gramercy Club units will be priced \as affordable by Edina's standards. Mr. Nichols said Met Council standards for affordable,housing in Edina is around 190 thousand dollars,` Mr ,,Nichols added one bedroom units would be priced in the 190 thousand dollar range one bedroom units plus den in the 200 thousand dollar range, Mr, Nichols stated the�average unit price would be around 385 thousand; With some units 600 thousand dollars. Mr. Nichols said he believes this development offers4a large pricing range. Concluding Mr. Nichols said he befieves there will be t�}ree affordable units in this proposal which is the same number reached 'in the Sebardi proposal. Commissioner Workinger.fhanke&Mr. Nichols, pointing out the proposal before the Commission this evening pontains\more units then the Bernardi plan which could mean more affordable units are warranted. ' ChaByron asl<ed Mr. Larsen if,here embers the number of affordable units in the previous proposal. Mr. Larsen responded in previous proposal three units were designated as affordable, however, that was reduced to two units when on6\building went condo %caner occupied. Continuing, Mr. Larsen said the City, is very interested in maintaining and achieving affordable housing, but from the City's standpoint this proposal is very reasonable, with a wide range in unit price. Chair Byron said a.concern he has is with parking and asked Mr. Nichols if he believes the unit owners will always park their vehicles in the parking garage. Mr. Nichols said he believes the owners will routinely park their vehicles in their underground garage stalls. Chair Byron suggested to the proponents when this is forwarded to the City Council that samples of the exterior building materials are brought to the meeting along with a more detailed landscaping plan. Chair Byron said while the 7 landscaping plan appears to meet code it would be beneficial to add more landscaping. Commissioner Brown said while he believes the site is better served with more garage space parking he has a concern that visitor parking may not be adequate. He reiterated when developed there would be no way to achieve more surface parking if the need arose. Mr. Nichols acknowledged that statement and reiterated in his experience this type of facility doesn't experience the same surface parking demands seen in the more traditional condominium developments. Mr. Nichols said a large reason for'that is the residents of the proposed facility are over 55 years of age, are em V nesters or single adults, and many are retired which reduces the demand wo vehicles. f, Discussion ensued with Commissioners in agreemjent the proposal ha� merit, is of similar building height to the one previously approved and stressing to the proponent the importance of retaining and mak9taining the'existing berm along West 70th Street, and adding additional__ la_ ndscapin'g.to that berm to provide for adequate screening of the building from the residential properties;across on West 70th Street. Commissioner McClelland moved to recommend Final Development Plan and plat approval subject to an Agreement to grant easemept'for intersection improvements, Watershed District permits, staff approvalbUrevised landscape plan and schedule and satisfactory compliance with City Engineer's recommendations. Commissioner Brown seconded ther'motion. Ayes, Schroeder, Lonsbury, McClelland, Runyan, Workinger, Brown, Grabiel and Byron. Nay, Workinger. Motion carried. N J � . N o Le J\&) R �y v' COO-, w less �E% AGENDA ITEM II.B. SET HEARING DATE-- OCTOBER 4, 2005 PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT - GRAMERCY CLUB OF EDINA 5101 WEST 70TH STREET No packet data ❑ Oral presentation Information coming 4,9jN�11� •� REPORT /RECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor & City Council From: Craig Larsen City Planner Date: September 20, 2005 Subject: Final Rezoning and Final Plat Riverview Properties - 50 Street & Indianola Avenue Agenda -item: Il. C. Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action: ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion- Information/Background: (Public hearing is scheduled for October 4, 2005.) The Planning Commission voted to recommend approval at their August 31 ; 2005, meeting. 5 - - 518T&Tw [k!V\ \7,77,77111 '7 ;�z t -a:i__ d LOCATION MAP 491126TW .I.TW 412150TH STREET WEST 5017 INDIANOLA AVENUE I 52MOSTW e;V5111-4- A, 4,) e: vt 'y 0 I ki Legend Selected Features Street Name Labels munimat Boundary Streets Creeks Parks Parcels N Regular Meeting of The Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, August 31, 2005, 7:00 PM Edina City Hall Council Chambers 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN Case Number: S -05 -3, and Z -05 -1 Location . 41— 1 50' 2 St. West 5017 Indianola Ave. Property Owner: Riverview Commercial Properties, LLC 5015 13th Ave. So., Mpls. MN Applicant: Riverview Properties, LLC 5015 13th Ave. So., Mpls. MN Zoning: PRD-4, Planned Commercial District R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District Actions: Amend Comprehensive Plan, Final Rezoning, Final Plat approval, and lot width variance. Background: The City Council granted preliminary approval for the proposed redevelopment at their August 16, 2005, meeting. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposal on July 27, 2005. Zoning Compliance: The proponent has submitted all plans necessary for Final Rezoning and Final Plat approval. Plans include site plan, grading and utility plan, landscaping plan, building elevations with materials, and plat. The plans submitted comply with ordinance requirements. Request: The alley right of way between 4121 West 50th St and 5017 Indianola Ave. is proposed to be vacated. The property at 4121 West 50th St, the alley right -of -way and 5017 Indianola Ave. are to be replatted to provide a 22,147.7 sq ft lot for the condominium building and a 50.5 ft wide, 7,060.3 sq ft single dwelling unit lot along Indianola. The 1,681.9 sq ft vacated right -of -way and 3,932 sq ft portion of land from 5017 Indianola added to 4121 West 50th require rezoning from R -1, single dwelling unit district to PRD-4, Planned Residence District. A Comprehensive Land Use Plan amendment is needed to alter the designation of the property added to the condominium lot from a single family residential designation, as existing in the plan, to a multiple family residential designation as proposed. A Final Development Plan is required for the redevelopment of the condominium site. Recommendation: The plans submitted are consistent with those given preliminary approval by the Commission and Council. All requirements have been satisfied for final approvals. Staff recommends: 1. Change the land use designation of the northerly 28 feet of 5017 Indianola from Single Family to High Density Residential. 2. Final Rezoning from R -1 to PRD-4. 3. Final Plat approval. 4. Lot width and lot area variance for the single dwelling lot. 5. Vacation of alley right of way. m m D X S. U) < Z AC) M C/) z Ln 00 mr- Z m C) m INDIANOLA AVENUE .. • U) zmo ^t. • • cm l 1 r�.. •. CO •. •. LA k1 'idle r �• !I 1 1 I I 1 I I I n DZ M 1 I rn m Y.:• ii Cl) 'a I OD 0 I OD 0 to L — — — — — -- — — — — — — - - - --J •:'f j' /j I V I I � m_ I II rA. 48 aim bdb agyrq GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Tdn CM= Am 851 -45+-0002 WL Td Fm 1 -800 -252 -1166 V CIO /. I�l ° n� 0 10 20 e SMXE IN FM rte;` I� 333 W.hinei Suite 4210 Mim¢Vapois. Ph.(612(676 Fa. (612) 67C Cl) Z 2 0 0 Z 0 U g z Z z s gam. o 0 4�.- o Z U z5g w Un: =_w o �G6IMIVtw. ern MR I 3/4 BATH OPTION FLAT 1 w• . r -ft N01RN J\ 3/4 BATH OPTION •FLAT 1 ur . r•sr NORTH DJR 331 W"linelnn .Ave. N Suite 0210 hii— apolis, RN 55101 Ph. (612)676-2700 F. (612) 676 -Z7% C_Z L O C) Z 0 g z z z g g� o O Z� LL aZ J ir L Qa W O 3o3 J 8.9 O ar.rmnnmaa.m�, R�.d+�ti�ei.Nlvre iccglMlpn nUABE11 DAM s.rm - nwr«nc ravEn - IIIf�''1• t II m — n II t' DJR 331 W"linelnn .Ave. N Suite 0210 hii— apolis, RN 55101 Ph. (612)676-2700 F. (612) 676 -Z7% C_Z L O C) Z 0 g z z z g g� o O Z� LL aZ J ir L Qa W O 3o3 J 8.9 O ar.rmnnmaa.m�, R�.d+�ti�ei.Nlvre iccglMlpn nUABE11 DAM s.rm - nwr«nc ravEn `0 VT 3/4 BATH OPTION - FLAT 3 NORTH e )� 4 BATH OPTION - FLAT 4 w• . r.o . NORTH 333 W uhing— .Are- N Suim 0210 Mbu.q lis. MN 55401 Ph. (612) 676 -2700 F- (612) 676 -2796 r • F., Z I' g I R O i r •.P, r•r y Q (n J I z L - - -- — / F Q' ir O r - - - -- �, Z'M O .__ ....... .... -C.3 —�� J .g c 0a cw _ I I I I i U) zz, o TaEer ply � � rmie.nn�o In•.a• . r. -r c ,E wreraarm mo— I IF I .. ..___...__ _ ...... . .. ......._...._._..__ .. ..........._. _.... _..__. ..... ...... - -CT ..s . -TI' SECOND FLOOR PLdN v4- . r.p- - - - NORTH. A220 (r (r 1)3/4 BATH OPTION - FLAT 5 V�• NORTH ALTERNATE BATH OPTION - FLAT 5 w- . r -o NORTH IN- LM- (D44 BATH OPTION -FLAT 6 . r -o NORTH i __O =1 Al k s 0 WR 173 W uha", .Ara N Sui a 8210 Min pulu. MN 55401 Ph. 16121676 -2700 F. 16121676.2796 C) G _7 0 0 Z 0 U JZ z g a� o o Q -< O Zyls LL 00 s Q d VE W 3 O 0? > lt! i3 °w O ��memfneb�evmAGc mm W Y1si.MlmmC carom: A230 E r�s• � at THIRD FLOOR PLAN at NORTH 0 WR 173 W uha", .Ara N Sui a 8210 Min pulu. MN 55401 Ph. 16121676 -2700 F. 16121676.2796 C) G _7 0 0 Z 0 U JZ z g a� o o Q -< O Zyls LL 00 s Q d VE W 3 O 0? > lt! i3 °w O ��memfneb�evmAGc mm W Y1si.MlmmC carom: A230 PRELIMINARY WEST ELEVATION _.�ll PRELIMINARY EAST ELEVATION (DLIIIINARY NORTH ELEVATION PRELIMINARY SOUTH ELEVATION �-- I" � ObfL.4TED blAM ROOPM ao ,— O often *.—ss O—TN O.,oc A Qr o T— CM m C yCAP J 333 Wuhinetan .Ave. N Suite 4210 Minmapulii MN 55401 M.(612) 6M.2700 F..(612)676 -2796 U) 0 a Z 0 0 z Z s=ue 06 sgF O woo U.) . TnRE PuwrErEn U) z 0 w w cc 0 a: w �7< LLJ cc z LU cc (L M. #R 50TH STREET CONTEXT ELEVATION r . W.O. 2 INDIANOLA AVENUE CONTEXT ELEVATION ' =. MR 50th.& INDIANOLA CONDOMINIUMS I.• —w NEW CONSTRUCTION b± �+• atlxc 333 i¢• Wuhin Inn Aw. V 8 Su tl210 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA .ntlmraa rir neaE o�rE. DATE ° 7° m A6�1 Mi— pnli°, MV 5-wl ph. (61 2 ) 676-2700 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS -- G'E Da° F..,(612)676 -2746 nGis=n•nw­Ea FA—E P-O � I FRONT ELEVATION 111E5T1 REAR ELEVATION (EAST) 0s.M 1 ��- rte• -,- Y 4IlA II I 1 r. r. arert) �Drun, G/r. ea4D capon Y• -r . w -r are � rl fl 'rg U rlP�fl 11 1 1 Later p4n) 1 1 I I LJ LJ LJ LJ L--------------------------------------- J NORTX UPPER LEVEL PLAN 1,955 SF. LIVEABLE v0• . r -0- r — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- - 1 i � r a.Iro! iti .Ird. IWr I I NLLL 1 11 YO01C I I 11 I 001 LrvNO wa +l I pp�y �r I I •4• P i F4T.0' -Yi i f•O.O'•r• I IC grCIB. T' 1 C L J O L.— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — J NORTH MAIN LEVEL PLAN 1,411 5F LIVEABLE ue• . r -o 2094 SF. FOOTPRINT ..._ _.. _. - . ....... ...... _. .._ _.._ .. : . .. ..) OIDE ELEVATION (NORT1.11 ver . r -v S SIDE ELEVATION (SOUTH) W. r -o WORTH �LOII�R LEVEL PLAN 1 .248 SF LIVEABLE � v4• . r -rr 111����1t 1 JR 337 W.,hieeum A— N Suite )210 Mi—I'l ,. MN 55401 Ph. (612) 6762700 Fax (61216762796 w Z w Q w O = Q 4�a ZS� a n �g w 3:.z O Z U) z4 In I.s,rsl,rwYtltr -� .wo)n.w4�venm, rr.+arrle.mrlm.a 4Wtlbss4Y)�41Ym ec naE Irc¢muv.rueFw w.[ awroic lEVEw DITE A100 LIVEABLE AREA LOLLER LEVEL 1,240 SF. MAIN LEVEL 1.411 SF. UPPER LEVEL 1,955 SF. TOTAL 4A W SF. LIVEABLE 1 JR 337 W.,hieeum A— N Suite )210 Mi—I'l ,. MN 55401 Ph. (612) 6762700 Fax (61216762796 w Z w Q w O = Q 4�a ZS� a n �g w 3:.z O Z U) z4 In I.s,rsl,rwYtltr -� .wo)n.w4�venm, rr.+arrle.mrlm.a 4Wtlbss4Y)�41Ym ec naE Irc¢muv.rueFw w.[ awroic lEVEw DITE A100 0 R O 2004 RLK- KUwlsto. LTD. A E STAG 1L B 8"WATER 8' WATER 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I I I 1 I 1 WEST 50TH STREET M u _ 4 6 �I ELMIQ O42" ELM 10 SAN - 10' SAN 8" GAS K PROVIDE Sil TFIIQ ROaOYE EASIOIG Y- s COMOSTE SIDEWAu 5 AFL n S" MAPLE _1' MAPLE /O \l 1�0 ♦ i / ^ \ 1 vaZi U �� EXIS7sMG � (ro RE pes " IuP1E s" MA TRANSPLANTED B rvl TDro LANDSCAPES W °m o AwROMM, m I FOR DETALSI O TO T[ Fm �I APLE C Ol ' ASH MIST M6 BUILDING /u n REMOr I1 /y I DnIva GARAm jI :,- T EWSTM UNIL (&J]" ELM 1 S I r RF]]IOIC OuSiri 1 �• - 1 -. � 911ROg15 � Er$lEli OM]OEAD Pg1q « n r VACATED -ALLEY 4 .r �$ =w •.K—= `' .,A- 11../�.l�..ff., ., ._ .. _ ..11' LLM ay li" ASH,�- < RET�K IIIA�iL CREMOr_E_[IDSrEw ROIDIE EASDND F 0 d TING i x ,9 1� I _ T ' I REMOVE E)II M BFTIAMNOb DECK MANTAN AND A PROTECT ImR z m nNl �e IF I� • �WIOMDVC EA DOCK EASTER: FENCE iENCE 4 MAXNUL• SPACING (SO W. TENSILE) LOCATED N TOP B" .E FABRIC 6" AND FASTEN AT 2' RITE RVALS (INN. WIDTH 367 T, / MACHINE SLICE a" tr DEPN (WIN 4 1 pn c n'y 'ST DULL II .1364 rrE •7r�MY --, 1 jT 7 GARA2 VJ ONE EOSIEMG JO ELM ' POl" LINE 0 REMOVE 7TEL REMOVE ETESTNr AND PLANTU WL OAL OTReM06 PROVIDE SILT FENCE 0 r- Emsfm. BURD� 8 GAS REMOVE EASING PLAIITERREJ; M T T E c INNER E aM ANI WEAL E61RC rrMnrAD PDREI EL ■ i N� 0 L 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 2* X 2' WOOD OR STEEL FENCE POST S' MINIMUM LENGTH AT PLASTIC 2W TIES MAXNUL• SPACING (SO W. TENSILE) LOCATED N TOP B" CEOTEXTT E FABRIC - OVERLAP FABRIC 6" AND FASTEN AT 2' RITE RVALS (INN. WIDTH 367 UT FABRIC M THE TRENCH MACHINE SLICE a" tr DEPN (WIN 6" FLAP) pn z `S /6" PgYENVLQRE ROBE SUPPORT POST ANCHORAGE ATTTAACH FABRIC TO SUPPORT POSTS ON PLASTIC 21P TIES GRADING GRD-01 SILT FENCE - STANDARD YA—E SUCED Cali 48 Hours before digging GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin Cities Area 651- 454 -0002 MN. Toll Free 1- 800 - 252 -1166 1 REMOVAL NOTES CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT 'GOPHER STATE ONE CALL' (651- 454 -0002) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES TO BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO REMOVALS. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE/RELOCATE EXISTING PRIVATE UTIUTIES AS NECESSARY. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ACTIVITIES WITH UTILITY COMPANIES. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL REMOVALS NOTED ON PLANS. ALL PERMITS, APPLICATIONS AND FEES ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. EXISTING BUILDING TO BE REMOVED TO ALL LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS. �5E � ii D R asss sgS p fib I ¢5 i $�g% E gre .. t y� 0 B Z; O: N. 5 W aslTff H is MnMn z o z p � J z y d %i Z cn � J UJ � W i W W L)( L D n i V on Z 0 N0 VJ 0 0 LL 0 LEGEND TO BE REMOVED D(IST1NC aRM LINE Q TRH 0 J SA11NT LIZ - - - - 0 9TU/iOUS PAVFNERT /LL CO CRIED PAVE E MT SILT FENCE (PROPOSED) TREE PROTECTION PROTECTION FENCE U Z Z W Z a �5E � ii D R asss sgS p fib I ¢5 i $�g% E gre .. t y� 0 B Z; O: N. 5 W aslTff H is MnMn z o z p � J z y d %i Z cn � J UJ � W i W W L)( L D n i V on i, 1 p 1, 0 2004 RLK- KYUSialo, LTD. . tt tt IM WEST 50TH STREET FOUNTAIN (REFER EXISTING TREE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR TO RETAIN PROPOSED 5 DETAILS) (T) DEWALK M Q 6' ELYO 6' ELMO 0 Lo F y LINE 7 0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET SITE NOTES CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. BUILDING DIMENSIONS REFER TO THE OUTSIDE FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. TYPICAL FULL SIZE 90' PARKING STALL IS 9' X 19' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL CURB RADII SHALL BE 5.0' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL CURB AND GUTTER TO BE 8612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PEDESTRIAN RAMPS TO BE CONSTRUCTED AT ALL CURB CROSSINGS OF SIDEWALK. SITE DATA LOT 1 0.50 ACRES LOT 2 0.16 ACRES SIGN LEGEND ® ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN (18 "02 ") WITH VAN ACCESSIBLE SIGN (6 "02') ® ACCESSIBLE AISLE -NO PARKING 12X18 me �' PdWi01� Vex= D ACCE3381E wD°m m m 'M TAUM PAVEMENT SECTION VARIES 3' RAD. SLOPE GLITTER TO MATCH PA NG LOT DRAINAGE (3 /4' PER FT. TYP.) 0 S Y—APLC — 1 .a 3D� . Up r RAD. O . PROPOSED 7 a I a REGMN o 5 11 MAPLE a. "' . 91VYWOUS PAVEMENT (ME RETAINING WALL s' MAPLE U Aa fn (TYP.) D , TRANSPLANTED WIMUY OF .' AGGREGATE '^ Y1 // BASF TINDER CURH (IF TOT. TREE THICIOICSS OF SECTION ALL011 I j O W co Z Y — — — — — Z W MaosrcD 'e' S. CURB ® - " �[ —•— I > n I Q O9• I I LOT 1 'B' I A I J • MODIFIED 0CURB 'L I STYE DETAIL) I TB. LOG MATCH EOS YAN LEVEL F.F.E. - 890.80 I AD WAY SECTION FOR FE LEVEL FF.E�880.30 I GARAGE UTILITY INSTALLATION ROAD REPAIR Q :- L 7.3' 4.9•� I -I I`• 's•. •. PATIO WITH • INTEGRAL Z i• , COLORED RETAINING WALL - • I -RE : TE AND RAILING P°"VE" AP TRANSI CURB t . - 'SETBA T 35' REDD R�0_ �.9'"I •10 SETBACK MATCH E)OSTING CURB W I SINE IN INDIA , m I VACATED ALLEY - PROPOSED 5' CONCRETE-- uo EGRESS WALK (FlEID 35' BLDG < LOCATE FINAL LOCATION) SETBACK �' �e 4 ( A „ TRANSPLANTED ( 30 TREE -. • ` 0 5' REDD 5. " -- vRd-OSEo ■ 1N�US Owa I m SETBACK ; SETBAM 1 .. LOT 2 4SETBABCK G I VY 91 CNEWY OPOSED SINGLE FAMILY I 30.6' BLDG F.FE -883.0 1 SETBACI( - -• - - - - J- - Lo F y LINE 7 0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET SITE NOTES CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. BUILDING DIMENSIONS REFER TO THE OUTSIDE FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. TYPICAL FULL SIZE 90' PARKING STALL IS 9' X 19' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL CURB RADII SHALL BE 5.0' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL CURB AND GUTTER TO BE 8612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PEDESTRIAN RAMPS TO BE CONSTRUCTED AT ALL CURB CROSSINGS OF SIDEWALK. SITE DATA LOT 1 0.50 ACRES LOT 2 0.16 ACRES SIGN LEGEND ® ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN (18 "02 ") WITH VAN ACCESSIBLE SIGN (6 "02') ® ACCESSIBLE AISLE -NO PARKING 12X18 me �' PdWi01� Vex= D ACCE3381E wD°m m m 'M TAUM PAVEMENT SECTION VARIES 3' RAD. SLOPE GLITTER TO MATCH PA NG LOT DRAINAGE (3 /4' PER FT. TYP.) 0 TIP GUTTER OUT AS REO'D 1 .a 3D� . Up r RAD. r3� . - a a I a 1r I a. "' . L WN. Q . -� WYW 1' BEHIND AGG. BASE UNDER CRIB YI BACN Of CURB (IF TOT. Nil NESS OF SECDCJ ALLOMS) CURB TYPE -A •� A 1-12 1 12' 1 20- L B61B 18- 26- Bfi2. 24- 32' RAD. PAVEMENT RLK PVM-F-03 06 STYLE CONCRETE CRIB AND GUTTER PATIO DECORATIVE DISTANCE V IES RAILING FINISHED 2005 GRADE VARIES SECTION A -A H=% REFERENCE TO MN -DOT SPEC. 2321 CONTRACTION .JOINTS AT S' SPACING CUBIC YARDS PER LINEAL FOOT - 0.0517 LINEAL FEET PER CUBIC YARD - 16.21 MANSION JOINTS EVERT 40' OR LESS PAVEMENT �\ RUK PVMT -24 ca.alnt voc.ALx scTroN il"' J IT ^5E 8 s k 5 6 sE� z ._LaEe� E S� J ;E _Fe� < o 1 a i A 5 Z: . Z ' O: tn. z N �036� �381 m 2 z m zy 0 W I v ? a LLI I- W z H L In H W t l) 3 � � o J 0 it a w a 0.5' RIO. 91VYWOUS PAVEMENT a A U Aa fn e z WIMUY OF .' AGGREGATE Z // BASF TINDER CURH (IF TOT. THICIOICSS OF SECTION ALL011 a I— W co PAVEMENT K a: Z MaosrcD 'e' S. CURB ® - " J IT ^5E 8 s k 5 6 sE� z ._LaEe� E S� J ;E _Fe� < o 1 a i A 5 Z: . Z ' O: tn. z N �036� �381 m 2 z m zy 0 W I v ? a LLI I- W z H L In H W t l) 3 � � o I W 02004 RLK- Kuuslsto, LTD. Coll 48 Hours before digging THRUST BLOCK GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin Cities Area 651 - 454 -0002 MN. Toll Free 1 -BW- 252 -1166 p y A UTILITY NOTES i/ CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS i PLAN MEW OF EXISTING UTIUTIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES TAPPING SLEEVE OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT 'GOPHER STATE ONE CALL' (651- 454 -0002) FOR RESSTANT WEDGE VALVE UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. COJEORIRNG TO AWWA C -509 S7ANDARDS WATER MAIN, SANITARY SEWER EE STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION 8- WATER 8- WATER SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF STANDARD T I I I w w w w w— �I SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE USE qI0 C -II SECTION " -" INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER WEST 50TH STREET '� INSTALLATION' AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS I ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA. M M II �i� — =11 I�IIII�JII r' I �II —I II I'~ CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE IIH- 11011E -111 COMPACTED EARTH BACKrRy SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE v' CON _B L CK SUMPED 0.15 FEET PER DETAILS. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON +1 HRUST B oo e' cons. eLQO THIS PLAN DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS. I o' SAN v uT 10- SAN O rr 10- SAN _ m as IM WATER MAIN �� o REFER TO SITE PLAN FOR CURRENT HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS RL w w w w R_ WAT-06 RLK AND LAYOUT. PROTECT EXC C1IDRANT WET ,11P 4 O O- Q UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.CTILE IRON PIPE (D.I.P.) CLASS 52 Z APPROXIMATE LOCATION rMISHEU GRAVE < Q OF E7(ISTING GAS SERVICE ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK s ^ I (TO BE RELOCATED) 1 OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. m COORDINATE MTH 1 a_ MECHANICAL PLAN TYPICAL HYDRANT CONSISTS OF: HYDRANT, GATE VALVE, 2.5' S_ OF 6' DIP WATERMAIN AND ANY HYDRANT EXTENSION. As S"E 1 BACI(rILL 3 — AS svrorED HYDRANT EXTENSIONS SHALL BE INCIDENTAL X APPROXIMATE TELEPHONE Q A MINIMUM OF 7.5 FEET OF COVER IS REQUIRED OVER ALL SERVICE WIITTH I 1 - WATERMAIN, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE Q MECHANICAL PLAN I 1� w Y REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18' VERTICAL Z CUT IN 6' r _ ^ 1I 60' -6' PVC O 1.007[ I s ',+ 1 SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. PVC WYE O IE= 870.73 SAN. SEWER SERVICE wATERMA ATERIAy 12 A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 L IE -87130 I 1' AS SPECn[D / FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL F 1 UTILITIES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. I MAIN LEVEL F.F.E =690.80 § I GARAGE LEVEL Fi.C- 880.31) I 1 1, :.''7!) BEDDING 8- COMBINED FIRE PROVIDE BELL MOLE TERIAL ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE TO BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE IO 6' WET TAP - - 48•_8' DIP A DOMESTIC SERVICE I ( AT EACH JOINT (P.V.C.) SDR 35 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6" GATE VALVE L 8' REDUCER I LL- TRENCH DRAIN I I l Y I I I I I - - -e• , SS MAINTAIN AS-BUILT PLANS RE-511,0.08 CONTRUCTIONAND SUBMIT THESE PLANS TO ENGINEER UPON r 1) A IE =877.08 COMPLETION OF WORK. Z I PROXIMATE ELECTRICAL I � ac o.1). f \ 7 W SERVICE LOCATION. I l COORDINATE VAIN DD. + 2., MAx O MECHANICAL PLAN I U CONNE TO EX F BCDDING MATERIAL AND ENCASEMENT _ _ _ _ — 1 f�W^ EX. tY HOPE MATERIAL SH LL BE SELECTED MATERIAL « n _ M M I ` 1 IE- 861.33 MR THE EXCAVATION OR As SPEOr ED. 12 -90' BEND O .-X—^ CORE DRILL EXG EX. 12' HOPE uMSro W a, °J < CATCH BASH 1 TEE IE= BB7.53 WATER r1 Ism �_ LL IE= 876.503 ARMOR OUTLET M ORATIVE WAT -13 g 25' -lY HOPE DIKTAE IRON WAIERYAN TRENCN o[rAx _ ROCK MULCH IN SIZES RANGING FROM !' -6' APPROXIMATE O 0.201 1 TRANSFORMER O ECT EX Z ��"�Li 12' OUTLET I 125 -12' HDPE W 0.207E — — — 12__� J I 1 I EO D SECTION I APPROXIMATE IU33I FRElTEDELECTRIC `QJ LINE. CONTRACTOR TO 4 COORDINATE WITH UTILITY rw19RD GRADE O COMPANY. of (D 1 M09?D SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE I IL 1 1 F.F.E. -883.0 1 1 FIELD LOCATE ANY a- ^ ADDITIONAL RETAINING WALL OUTLETS OR PIPING AND CONNECT TO 12' DENSnr [wPACTED HOPE STORM SEWER. aRANwn.w BAOCFILL YA1CWU (9 REQUIRED) n I y g I COMPACTED aRANULM I , ENCASEMENT v = I D.1 ENCASEMENT D (N REOIRRE I LEGEND PROPOSED EXISTING IaiN , I D/1 0 COMPACTED MATERIAL AR WATERIAN 1 m EXISTING SINGLE NARKS B[DDINC TETML 7 FAMILY RESIDENCE PNCQEw7AL) FIRE HYDRANT W/ VALVE M ooA L MIN. I GTE VALVE Q ^ F� 01 2 �•1 FOUNDDAT ON 6 REEMARTD) POST RaK'Atat VALVE s ry 0 SANITARY SEWER > > 1 , 1 SANITARY FIORCEMAIN YPM SO" AREA SANITARY MANHOLE • O Ey x 1 NDT� GAS MAIN a w 8 ii0 I I¢vsn SANITARY �\ HA Y&rAD C V A MILTED Im c Llf OVERHEAD TECITEC a s t SAN 10 �. LINOCK OLIND CABLE TELEVISION uY n PVC SANITARY SEVER TRENCH DETALL OVERHEAD 1ElEAlOIE „ tINDOMMOUND IIIEPHONE it;: 0 20 40 FIBER OPTIC 11013-HOME iV HEIR g SCALE w FELT r .s lo� g g5E N5 a�5 a� Ea �S a Sags E rE s E3 . E, .1 <° o :1 Una ,n: o; rn: 5 a '- e �y8a F7�N .O N to TA a� _Z 0 F Z Q oLa a W U _Z F_ H W 2 J F W t O LO �N G "T [-W aU NT o a i „ o c l 02004 RLX- KYusislo, LTD. T1W-90.5 �`� �' Call 48 Hours before digging ig ) OW-88.5 ( 1 �..! l; y_ • ! \• GOPHER STATE ONE CALL / STEF I- v 0 �O Twin Cities Area 651- 454 -0002 - -- 1.12. TREAD gp.. + p MN. Toll Free 1 -800- 252 -1166 FEE r 4 ubtx `t I 1w- 90.3 \• GRADING NOTES \ 1 + 86.0 A _ ! \ \ $9 ZQ r8.47�_ CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS 79 OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO i O `� QTE1 O THE COMMENCEMENT OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR / 77 TW -9D 2 0 SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES R VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. I 12. TREAD Z `.,> W-87.0 88928 I 6" ■ \ I ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. "GOPHER _ ^ 881% _ '` - _ O 8 CONTACT STATE ONE CALL" (651- 454 -0002) FOR see.u,E ^88702 889..1 iC _ - -- - to STEPS `Q. UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. 00 b2 BBB OS TC 88..1 1C lC 889 �:E' -1 -•_ TC BB9.38 88928 TC 889-0) Bgg 83 -- TC — CBI I 12' • O I �- 6• RISE \ CONTRACTOR SHALL STRIP, STOCKPILE AND RE- SPREAD IS TOPSOIL I (COMPACTED) DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED R WEST,_0"TH STREET -- I w= 6,.'%,Tw=M1 �o I SEEDED. - -- "r •'� y , THE SITE GRADING OPERATIONS, WHEN COMPLETED, SHALL �� 6 51EP5 RESULT IN ALL AREAS BEING GRADED TO "PLAN SUBGRADE I' 12 TREAD ' I RISER ELEVATION ". THIS "PLAN SUBGRADE ELEVATION' SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR BUILDING RI "°887.51`,: '" I 'jo I AND PAVEMENT AREAS. THE "PLAN SUBGRADE ELEVATION" IN 1780 �e7.66 1 T v_N _ -. _ 1 .(^C� B81C99 y ' OB'.IITC I THE PARKING LOT AND DRIVEWAY AREAS SHALL BE 88].55 O RIM - 68).19 7. ° C I �O' Q - ` R I DETERMINED BY CHECKING THE PAVEMENT SECTION DETAILS AND REFERRING TO PAVING PLAN FOR LOCATIONS AND UMITS 7 T'. eeec . ea c]z I ` DEPRESS CURB , i IV' OF VARIOUS PAVEMENT SECTIONS. 89 � r . — — — — — T _ . _ , "� Q Q Q (�� \ I Ox \ O� 'jo 2.0 GA I ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS REPRESENT FINISHED SURFACE R GUTTER LINE GRADES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ` 990 L �O' REFER TO SITE PLAN FOR CURRENT HORIZONTAL SITE ELE- 809.1. LEE .\ • 6y .. _ J DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT. - �L 6 • \ 1 -. INSET A kB �. '88e.i. a 19 • - •' / SCALE" I " =10' EXISTING TOPORAPHY PROVIDED BY JAMES R. HILL T . 8 `0$ �y�, ®; 125 TRPEAD EROSION CONTROL NOTES I -SEE MSET 6• RISER AT RIGHT O+ �° \ ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR 1 l TO COMMENCEMENT OF GRADING OPERATIONS AND BE Z - -,ALL' MAINTAINED UNTIL ALL DISTURBED AREAS ON THE SITE HAVE BEEN RESTRED. O t25� AT j• x cl 6" RISER 2 r °°° oR STEEL FENGE PLAS IC ZIP TIES ALL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE SURFACED MATH ZI. % I yy �RN LE1F1 FFE -89afio ! OB951 POST 5' uRMMUM LENGTH AT 4' NA=UM SPAONG (5D w. TENSLE) LOCATED r ,CEP a CRUSHED ROCK ACROSS FULL WIDTH, FROM ENTRANCE POINT Q 2 GARAGE LEVEL FF.E- 880.70 ;+ TO 75 FEET INTO CONSTRUCTION ZONE (REFER TO DETAIL). / BBTEn L - j.s� d 1 EOTEXTIIE FABRIC - OVERLAP Ham- J e°� 1.257L .A' 114 I =IC 6- ANB FASTEN AT 2' WTERVAIS KII-ACHPIE ALL SLOPES 3:1 R STEEPER, NOT TO BE SODDED AND ( i ! ® i GREATER THAN 8 FEET IN HEIGHT, SHALL HAVE EROSION CONTROL FABRIC INSTALLED ON SLOPE PER MNDOT SPEC. I I SIN A7 1. x ur FABRIC IN THE TRENCH 3885. VERIFY RESTORATION METHOD AND SEED MIXTURE. (n f ire I 2 SLICE 6--12' DCPM (m1H OPRIOR INSTALLATION LNG TO ENGINEER FOR T I 1 td STPS m -- 12" TREAD ' 6 FLAP) APPROVAL TO O I Ic - 1W=8,.0 12 . m x _ gw =80.8, \ 6• ■5p( 6" RISER �I x n 1 m I \ DIRECTION uF mmGSr TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL (HAY BALES OR APPROVED ♦ , U TW -84.0 h �� 1\ EQUIVALENT) TO BE PLACED AROUND STORM SEWER << m BYRoBt.t �_ �, � � / - 4o STRUCTURES DURING CONSTRUCTION (REFER TO DETAIL). e (� SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ALL SEDIMENT CONTROL O 2 �a DEVICES AS NECESSARY AND MUST BE REMOVED IF DESIGN J 2 �< 1 TW =6t•2 eeix, � . _A 86�'- BW =8L2 p�BT 9 eel: 7 ! 1 CAPACITY HAS BEEN REDUCED BY 50X LL /' / �IN_eea3e e / I 888 X e % I 3 E1B6]9 egz POLYETHYLENE ROPE SEDIMENT TRACKED OFF RESULT 1 DISTEND RETAINING SAL mBE FETID AND/A -SITE, AS A OF CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC, SHALL BE MINIMIZED AND SWEPT ON A DAILY BASIS. Z SKI — -� 488/_83} eeDS1 .9. �K �� 3f i T m c rR�ERn ':T SUPPORT POST ANO1ORA• NOS. ATTACH FABRIC m SUPPORT ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED WITH SOD, SEED, I x SD1x SCALE A� 1\--�eD.e3 c w SR Pos,s ra1H Pusnc zw TIES WOOD FIBER BLANKET R PAVED SURFACE WITH 14 DAYS. I TW =62.0 5 STEPS % I I BW =820 24• TREAD 1 I I 5Ox 12!7 �B .- eal.ux 6" RISER 4.aE- "'— ITC xeez.l9_ GRADING O eelw \ "C'' I 9,v eel eezA9- "- 88227 e�6Tb I ` C GIRD -01 FENCE RTK ma mil° _F PR�-0SEL SINGLE FAMILY R e 1 :: i 541 - S,ANOARD MACH- SLICED a �✓ 01.6 1 F.F.E. -BMEI 1183.191 v I I i v882.98x- ;X x_I6 e82 egz.5'6 1.]2 A 86581 BBS36 Tf Sall, xt,-- -- ._ - -_ -� `. -- - - ^` -- qi• (• 1 ,v LCI l- - --�� BB3.52 TC \ / p ®8 1 IC2 LEGEND PROPOSED oclsTD,c O 1381.611 EXISTING SNGIE ;• . FAMILY RESIDENCE ' TOPOGRAPHIC NCC1 COITCUR --- ---- 4011 — _60o— Z_ 88.58 697-02 TOPOGRAPHIC COngq 6O7 � — �pp1 _ L 896.n - e9..88 I Be7c'�5 EDGE OF WETLAND POND NORMAL WATER LEVEL DITCH CNIFFINE — ... — SILT FENCE W^ - / �•.•3 89311 Ije SOL Some � 0 -•.. 1317 SPOT EIEVATKN {.L v _ J x BOOR° x BD°.00 DRAINAGE SLOE - 13 WAN7LE RIN =88..50 // CATCH BASIN ■ -P / CATCH BASIN MANHOLE • o S F ' / 0 20 40 STORM MAn1oLE 0 O FLARED Oa ► D ee..7z ° Tc sec st/ SCALE IN FEET FLARED END e/ RIP RAP ® LL 9 NO "s=° g a 5 6P J- 21 ,5 z S TSo E 5 E P1. < D W tr Ln Z: o; Ln: 5: z 3 cal � � ?:7 E:)JR_ SETBACKS 501h Street ARCHITECTURE PLANNING URBAN DESIGN Mh & Indianola Six Unit Condominium Side Street Yard Indianola Ave. Front Yard South Side Yard East Side Yard HEIGHT 501h & Indianola 333 WASHING "T'ON AVE. N. SUITE 2 10, UNION PLAZA MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 PHONE: 61 2.676.2700 FAX: 6 1 2.676.2796 August 16, 2005 - 35' -0" Required, 28' -0" Proposed to match existing setback - Request 7' -0" Setback Variance - 35' -0" Required, 35' -0" Proposed - 35' -0" Required, 29. P Proposed - Request 5.9' Setback Variance - 35' -0" Required, 18.3' Proposed - Request 16.7' Setback Variance - 35' -0" maximum, 36' -1" Proposed - Request 1' -1" Height Variance - Height is measured from the entrance grade to the mid point of the highest gable. PARKING - 1.25 Covered and .75 Surface per unit - Six Units x Two parking spaces = 12 Spaces Required. - 15 Parking Spaces Provided. - 11 Enclosed Standard Stalls 1 Enclosed Accessible Stall 2 Surface Standard Stalls I Surface Van Accessible Stall PARKING SETBACKS - 20' -0" from property line and 10' -0 from building Required. - 7' -2" from property line and 10' -0" from building Proposed - Request 12' -10" Parking Setback Variance 5017 Indianola Sinzle Family Dwelling Residence SETBACKS Indianola Ave. Front Yard - 30' -0" Required - 30' -6" Proposed East Backyard - 25' -0" Required - 49' -0" Proposed South Side Yard - 5' -0" Required - 5' -0" Proposed North Side Yard - 5' -0" Required - 5' -0" Proposed HEIGHT 501h & Indianola - 30' -0" Maximum - 25' -11 '/2" Proposed SUGGESTED PLANT SCHEDULE Quantities Shown are for the Entire SittDevelopment. OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS TREE FALL FIESTA SUGAR MAPLE REDMOND LINDEN AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE GREENSPIRE LINDEN ORNAMENTAL TREES & UNDERSTORY TREES a. PRAIRIEFIRE CRAB 8'- lo' !} 4 s JAPANESE TREE LILAC t SPRING SNOW CRAB Y' 1° ee . ► BIRCH'ROYAL C RVISSON I ° 8� L CRABAPPLE 'THUNDERCHILD' 9' ,o' 3 MAGNOLIA 'ANN' G' 8 6 4 MAGNOLIA 'RICKI' (o' 8 C S PAGODA DOGWOOD it 10 L AMUR MAPLE'EMERALD ELF "13 I MOUNTAIN ASH'SHOWY' 2'�Q 9 SERVICEBERRY'ALTTUMN BRILLIANCE' io EVERGREEN TREES 6 pb 3 FIR'HORSTMANN'S SILBERLOCKE' I HEMLOCK'AUREA COMPACTA' 66,64 l HEMLOCK'DAWSONIANA' (1 -6 1 PINE'ARNOLD SENTINEL' G'Q4 3 PINE 'BALKAN BLUE' G ' 8h 3 PINE 'NORWAY COMPACT' J'6,6 PINE'WHITE COLUMNAR' V0 6 S SPRUCE'DWARF NORWAY' 1' dw 3 SPRUCE'COLORADO BLUE' I'd 6 7 SPRUCE'DWARF BLUE GLOBE' 2''�1° S SPRUCE 'ELEGANS' 11' Qd 1 SPRUCE 'PENDULA' S' :6lS S SPRUCE 'SERBIAN PIMOKO' VbS ' 5 aiuc 5►�a3e, �a.Ve Q,Nt` CONIFER TREES 3 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE 7`66 S SCOTCH PINE 8'6h SHRUBS S MISS KIM LILAC MAGIC CARPET SPIREA I 1 13 -*7 COMPACT AMERICAN VIBURNUM it = %S MINUET WEIGELA 5 -'%.S LITTLE PRINCESS SPIREA 5 S ARBORVITAE - rel ANDROMEDA 7 *4'S AZALEA I I - #S G6 *3 BARBERRY BOXWOOD C etmfgA ►7 45 JUNIPER EUONYMUS I I - *3 110-5 HYDRANGEA HYPERICUM 31 '9- 7 * 3 LILAC NINEBARK 7 #s ►s '� S RHODODENDRON ROSE' SMOKEBUSH STEPHANANDRA ! � 3 a? 03 EASY ELEGANCE SHRUB ROSES �� LANDSCAPE NOTES •-SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADES AND EROSION CONTROL AREAS • ALL PARKING LOT ISLANDS SHALL RECEIVE 4" SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. • ALL PLANTING BEDS AND SODDED AREAS TO BE IRRIGATED. • 2 ROWS OF SOD BEHIND CURB IN AREAS WITH TURF SEED MIX TYPICAL. • COORDINATE ROCK MULCHY TYPE AND COLOR WITH ARCHITECT. GENERAL IRRIGATION NOTES • LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A SHOP DRAWING OF THE IRRIGATION PLAN TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL. • PROVIDE PVC SLEEVES UNDER DRIVE FOR IRRIGATION AND ELECTRIC POWER. • IRRIGATION DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION IS TO BE PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR FOR TURF AND PLANTING AREAS. { PERENNIALS ASTILBE ► S _ '°" l P14 CONEFLOWER GOLDEN -EDGED HOSTA q - 1 BLEEDING HEART REEDGREASS 1 -43 2�•- �' l BLUE SLAVIA MOORGRASS - AV O � ► t -'� l HARDY GERANIUM RIBBONGRAS t 7 .- �►1 LADY'S MANTLE ASTER 1 S1 C R EUPATORIUM FERN 7 1 MISCANTHUS GRASS CALAMAGROSTIS GRASS a -:*3 -7-4% FESTUCA GRASS HEUCHERA ZS - +"' j�. 1- A3 HIBISCUS HOSTA J° - 2 LIGULARIA PHLOX 13 - 13-At RUSSIAN SAGE LANDSCAPE NOTES •-SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADES AND EROSION CONTROL AREAS • ALL PARKING LOT ISLANDS SHALL RECEIVE 4" SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. • ALL PLANTING BEDS AND SODDED AREAS TO BE IRRIGATED. • 2 ROWS OF SOD BEHIND CURB IN AREAS WITH TURF SEED MIX TYPICAL. • COORDINATE ROCK MULCHY TYPE AND COLOR WITH ARCHITECT. GENERAL IRRIGATION NOTES • LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A SHOP DRAWING OF THE IRRIGATION PLAN TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL. • PROVIDE PVC SLEEVES UNDER DRIVE FOR IRRIGATION AND ELECTRIC POWER. • IRRIGATION DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION IS TO BE PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR FOR TURF AND PLANTING AREAS. { . . e • IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS TO BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED PER REGIONAL CONDITIONS AND LOCAL REGULATIONS. LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS • MINIMUM # OF OVERSTORY TREES = PERIMENTER OF LOT IN FEET /40 REQUIRED TREES 6971/40 = 17.4 = 18 TREES PROVIDED TREES OVERSTORY TREES 12 TREES EXISTING TREES 6 TREES TOTAL PROPOSED 18 TREES ADDITIONAL TREES TO BE PLANTED CONIFER TREES 25 TREES ORNAMENTAL TREES 25 TREES e lo Cn o To: 1696 I REPORURECOMMENDATION Mayor & City Council Agenda Item IILA. From: Mike Siitari, Police Chief : ll Date: September 15,, 2005 Subject: 'Ordinance No. 2005 -10 Consent ❑ Information Only Mgr. Recommends 1:1 To HRA ® To Council ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ® Ordinance ❑ Discussion RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Ordinance No. 2005 -10, amending section 150 of the City Code to provide a legal basis for the City's use of the state criminal justice information system -for employment background checks. INFOBACKGROUND: The Edina Police Department maintains a computer terminal connection to the State of Minnesota Criminal Justice Information System (CJIS). In addition to the numerous criminal inquiries run on a daily basis, we use the terminal to run background checks on applicants for a variety of paid or volunteer ,positions with the City. The Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA) staff conducted an audit of our records process earlier this year for compliance with rules and statutes covering the use of our CJIS terminal. The BCA staff strongly recommended that we add a section to our City Code to provide a legal basis for our use of the terminal for employment purposes. The proposed City Code amendment is based upon the language suggested by the BCA. ORDINANCE NO. 2005- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 150 OF THE CITY CODE TO AUTHORIZE CRIMINAL HISTORY BACKGROUND CHECKS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Subsection 150.05 of the City Code is amended by adding a new Subd. 5 as follows: A. "Subd.5 Criminal History Background Checks. At the direction of the Manager, the Police Department is authorized to conduct criminal history background checks on applicants for appointment_ to City employment where the Manager has determined that conviction of a crime may relate to the position for which appointment is sought. Criminal history background checks may be performed only for individuals who are deemed by the Manager to be finalists for a paid or volunteer position. Prior to performing a criminal history background check, the Police Department shall receive from the Manager a written consent from the applicant agreeing to the background check and to the release of information discovered by the background check to the Manager and other City employees as determined by the Manager for the purpose of determining the applicant's qualification for employment by the City. The failure by the applicant to provide such a consent may disqualify the applicant for the position sought. Section 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon adoption. o e 1 * �y REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor Hovland and Members of the City Council FROM: John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: September 20, 2005 AGENDA ITEM: IV.A ITEM DESCRIPTION: Repave West Parking Lot — Lewis Park Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Bituminous Roadways, Inc. 1. $20,767.50 2. Midwest Asphalt Corp. 2. $24,848.19 3. Frattalone Paving, Inc. 3. $28,275.75 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Bituminous Roadways, Inc. $20,767.50 Account #: 1647.6103 GENERAL INFORMATION: This purchase is for scheduled renovation of the Lewis Park west parking lot. This purchase includes the removal of existing asphalt, building a sub -base with class 5 aggregate base material, placement of 1.5" 32B bituminous base course followed by a 1.5" 42A bituminous wear course. Surface area is 1,800 square yards. This project is being funded under the 2005 Paths and Hard Surfaces operating budget. If approved by Council, the project will be completed this fall. Edina Park and Recreation John K s, Director Department This Recommended bid is within budget not within budget hn i ce Director o don Hughes, it Manager To: City Council From: James B. Hovland Mayor Date: September 20, 2005 Subject: Mayor's Appointment REPORT/RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item V.A. Consent ❑ Information Only M Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA MTo Council Action M Motion ° ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance MDiscussion Recommendation: Endorse Mayor's appointments to the Edina Community Health Committee and the Heritage Preservation Board. Info/Background: We have some vacancies on our boards and commissions. I intend to appoint to fill the openings: ■ Mark E. Johnson to complete the term running until February 1, 2008, on the Edina Community Health Committee, left vacant by the resignation of Robert Scott who moved from Edina. Mark'was one of the candidates running- in-the 2004 Council election. He has a bachelor's degree from the University of Minnesota and works for LifeSource Organ/Tissue Donation Agency. . ■ Chris Rofidal to complete the term ending February 1, 2006, vacated by Peggy Jennings on the Heritage Preservation Board. Chris is a long time Edina resident with a BA in Communications and minor in history. "He has expressed a sincere desire to give back to his community. 0 i Zzo�-� A' �?> Ok Le t4 1 "66°B// RECOMMENDATION: Approve Settlement Agreement. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: G In accordance with our Redevelopment Agreement with Ron Clark Construction and Opus Construction, the City and the HRA were obliged to undertake remediation actions with respect to contaminated soil on the Grandview Square properties. This work was undertaken primarily in connection with the initial phases of Grandview Square. Last fall, a small amount of additional contaminated material was discovered during the final phase of the Grandview Square condominiums. The City issued a purchase order to Ramsey Excavating Company for the purpose of removing this contaminated material. Later on, Ramsey and Ron Clark Construction discovered additional quantities of contaminated material and proceeded to excavate and dispose 6 6 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item V.B. From: GORDON L. HUGHES Consent ❑ CITY MANAGER Information Only F-1 Date: SEPTEMBER 20, 2005 Mgr. Recommends ❑. To HRA ® To Council Subject: '. SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE ® Motion AGREEMENT - RAMSEY ❑ Resolution EXCAVATION ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion RECOMMENDATION: Approve Settlement Agreement. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: G In accordance with our Redevelopment Agreement with Ron Clark Construction and Opus Construction, the City and the HRA were obliged to undertake remediation actions with respect to contaminated soil on the Grandview Square properties. This work was undertaken primarily in connection with the initial phases of Grandview Square. Last fall, a small amount of additional contaminated material was discovered during the final phase of the Grandview Square condominiums. The City issued a purchase order to Ramsey Excavating Company for the purpose of removing this contaminated material. Later on, Ramsey and Ron Clark Construction discovered additional quantities of contaminated material and proceeded to excavate and dispose 6 REPORT/ RECOMMENDATION -Settlement and Release Agreement Ramsey Excavation September 20, 2005 Page two of these materials without seeking specific approvals from the City. In fairness to Ramsey and Ron Clark Construction, they believed that the City's authority to remove the material initially found included, authorization to remove the additional materials that were discovered. A dispute arose as to who. should be liable for the payment of the cost associated with the additional material: The proposed Settlement Agreement is our recommended resolution of; this dispute. Under, the terms of the Settlement Agreement, Ramsey has agreed to reduce their billings by approximately $12,000.00 and the City and Ron Clark Construction agree to split the remaining balance, which would result in a payment of $22,500.00 each. Although this payment is substantially more than originally contracted for, we believe Ahat it represents an equitable resolution of our dispute. . I 0 a SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE A. Parties This Settlement Agreement and Release ( "Agreement ") is entered into on the day of , 2005, by and between: a. Ramsey Excavating Company, a Minnesota Corporation with offices at 4060 Washington Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota along with their assigns, agents, insurers, predecessors, successors, heirs, devisees, employees, officers, and owners ( "Ramsey Excavating "); b.' The City of Edina, along with their assigns, agents, predecessors, successors, heirs, devisees, and employees (hereinafter "the City "); and C. R.E.C., Inc., d/b /a Ron Clark Construction and Design and d/b /a Ron Clark Construction, a Minnesota Corporation with offices at 7500 West 78th Street, Edina, Minnesota, along with their assigns, agents, insurers, predecessors, successors, heirs, devisees, employees, officers, and owners (hereinafter "R.E.C. "). B. Recitals WHEREAS, R.E.C. was the developer of condominiums at Grandview Square, located at 5275 Grandview Square, Edina, Minnesota, legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, Grandview Square P Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the Property"). WHEREAS, during construction of the Property, substantial amounts of the fill that had been excavated from the Property were found to be contaminated and were returned to the Property. WHEREAS, the City requested that R.E.C. make arrangements to remove this contaminated soil from the Property, and R.E.C. arranged for such removal with Ramsey Excavating. WHEREAS, the City claims it only authorized payment for hauling and disposing of approximately 110 tons of contaminated soil at a cost of no more than $2,695.00. WHEREAS, further contamination of the soil at the Property was discovered, and Ramsey Excavating excavated, hauled, and disposed of approximately 2,338 tons of contaminated soil from the Property on or about November 9 -10, 2004. WHEREAS, Ramsey Excavation has made a claim in the amount of approximately $57,000.00 against R.E.C. and the City for the excavation, hauling, and disposal of said soil from the Property. WHEREAS, R.E.C. has denied liability for said claim and asserted, in the alternative that said claim is the responsibility of the City and/or Ramsey Excavating; the City has likewise denied liability for said claim and has" asserted, in the alternative that said claim is the responsibility of Ramsey Excavating and/or R.E.C.. WHEREAS, Ramsey Excavating removed said contaminated soil and hauled it to an industrial waste facility operated by SKB Environmental, Inc., in Rosemount, Minnesota. WHEREAS, SKB Environmental, Inc. now holds a mechanic's lien against the Property in the amount of $34,231.39 for costs related to the contaminated soil. WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement desire to settle and compromise Ramsey Excavating's past, present, and future claims related to the excavation, hauling, and disposal of contaminated soils from the Property, although R.E.C. and the City maintain that they are under no legal obligation to do so. C. Terms of Agreement NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, it is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties as follows: R.E.C., Inc.: R.E.C., Inc. agrees to pay the amount of $22,500.00. 2. The City of Edina: The City of Edina agrees to pay the amount of $22,500.00. 3. Total Consideration: The total consideration paid by R.E.C., Inc. and the City of Edina is referenced above in paragraphs numbered 1 -2 of the section entitled, "C. Terms of Agreement," of this Agreement. 4. Release of R.E.C., Inc. and the City of Edina: Ramsey Excavating Company acknowledges that it became bound by this Agreement upon its execution of it, regardless of the date that this Agreement is executed by R.E.C., Inc. and the City of Edina. For the good and valuable consideration referenced in this Agreement, Ramsey Excavating Company, on behalf of itself, assigns, agents, insurers, predecessors, successors, heirs, devisees, employees, officers, and owners, fully and forever releases and discharges R.E.C., Inc. and the City of Edina, along with their insurers, officers, directors, employees, agents, successors, and assigns, and all other parties herein also mutually release each other, from any and all claims, liabilities, demands, damages, rights, actions, or causes of action, whether fixed or contingent, liquidated or unliquidated, direct or indirect, known or unknown, which they had, have, or may have in the future including, but not limited to claims for breach of contract, negligence, contribution, subrogation, indemnification, or insurance claims, which have been asserted, or could be asserted in the future, for personal injuries, property damage, or otherwise, arising out of, or in any way related to, the excavation, hauling, and disposal of contaminated soils from the Property. 5. Mechanic's Lien: Ramsey Excavating Company agrees to satisfy the outstanding mechanic's lien against the Property held �y SKB Environmental, Inc. in the amount $34,231.39, a copy of which is attached to this release as Exhibit A. Ramsey Excavating Company will not endorse the settlement .checks referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 until it has delivered to R.E.C., Inc. and the City of Edina.an executed lien release from SKB Environmental, Inc. 6. Authority to Enter Into Contract on Behalf of the City of Edina: Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 412.201, this Agreement shall be executed on behalf of the City of Edina by its mayor and clerk, with the corporate seal affixed, and only pursuant to authority from the council. 7. Non-disparagement: The parties to this Agreement covenant and warrant that they will not make any statements or communications which in any way allege or imply that any of the parties, their representatives, principles, partners, officers, directors, agents, employees, affiliates, parent companies, subdivisions, successors, or assigns, acted in any manner which was wrongful, tortious, or unlawful, or which gave rise to liability or fault. 8. Voluntary Action: The parties acknowledge that they have been represented by legal counsel in connection with the disputes referenced herein, or had the opportunity to consult with an attorney, understand all of the terms of this Agreement, and agree to be bound thereby in all respects. 9. Non - admission: The parties understand that by entering into or taking any action consistent with this Agreement, the parties do not admit liability to anyone, and any such liability is expressly denied. 10. Further Action: The parties agree to execute such further documents as may be necessary to fully effectuate the provisions of this Agreement, with each party to bear their own fees and costs. 11. No Mistake of Fact: It is understood that no mistake of fact with respect to the nature or extent of any losses, injuries, or damages, shall invalidate or void this Agreement. 12. Complete Agreement: The parties acknowledge that no.promise or inducement has been made or offered except as set forth herein, that the parties execute this Agreement without reliance upon any statement or representation by anyone as to the nature and extent of the losses, injuries or damages or of the probable or possible consequences thereof, this Agreement contains the entire agreement between them; and the terms of this Agreement are a contract and not a mere recital. 13. Severability: If any provision of this Agreement or application thereof is held invalid, the invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Agreement which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application. To this end, the provisions are severable. 14. Applicable Law: The parties acknowledge that any disputes concerning this Agreement are to be construed in accordance with Minnesota law, regardless of the domiciles of the . parties, the state in which they executed this Agreement, or other facts which could affect choice of law. 15. Signing: It is understood this Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall for all purposes be deemed an original and all of which constitute the same instrument. 16. Binding: This Agreement shall only be binding if all of the parties identified in the section entitled, "A. Parties," herein have signed this Agreement and signature pages for all parties have been provided to all parties. CAUTION READ BEFORE SIGNING. THIS IS A FULL AND FINAL RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS. YOUR SIGNATURE REPRESENTS THAT YOU READ AND UNDERSTOOD ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OBTAINED HEREIN. Ramsey Excavating Company, By: (Signature) Its: STATE OF ) ss: COUNTY OF ) (Print Name) (Title) On this day of , 2005, before me, a notary public within and for said County, personally appeared as of Ramsey Excavating Company, who acknowledged that he /she has read the foregoing Settlement Agreement and Release and signs the same on behalf of Ramsey Excavating Company. Notary Public 4 r. The City of Edina, By: (Signature) (Print Name) Its: Mayor By: (Signature) (Print Name) Its: Clerk (Affixation of the Corporate Seal) STATE OF ) ss: COUNTY OF ) On this day of , 2005, before me, a notary public within and for said County, personally appeared , as Mayor of The City of Edina, who acknowledged that he /she has read the foregoing Settlement Agreement and Release and signs the same on behalf of The City of Edina. STATE OF ss: COUNTY OF Notary Public On this day of , 2005, before me, a notary public within and for said County, personally appeared , as Clerk of The City of Edina, who acknowledged that he /she has read the foregoing Settlement Agreement and Release and signs the same on behalf of The City of Edina. 5 Notary Public R.E.C., Inc., By: (Signature) (Print Name) Its: (Title) STATE OF ss: COUNTY OF ) On this day of , 2005, before me, a notary public within and for said County, personally appeared , as of R.E.C., Inc., who acknowledged that he /she has read the foregoing Settlement Agreement and Release and signs the same on behalf of R.E.C., Inc. Notary Public 6 a r� 01 t REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Boyd Tate Traffic Safety Coordinator Date: 0 September 20, 2005 Subject: Traffic Safety Staff Review for September 6, 2005 Agenda Item # V.C. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ® Discussion Recommendation: Review and approve Traffic Safety Staff Review of Tuesday, August 2, 2005.. Info /Background: It is anticipated that Residents may be in attendance at the Council meeting regarding the following issues: • Section A.1. Request to revise City Ordinance No. 1400.10 Parking, Stopping, Standing and Loading .from the six consecutive hour parking regulation to a 12 consecutive hour parking period. G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Advisory Committee \Staff Review Summaries \05 TS AG & Min\rr 9- 20- 05.doc TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW Tuesday, September 6, 2005 The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on September 6, 2005. Staff present included the City Engineer, Traffic Engineer, Traffic Safety Coordinator, City Planner, Sign Coordinator, and Chief of Police. From that review, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They have also been informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the September 20, 2005 Council Agenda. SECTION A: Requests on which staff recommends approval: 1. Request to revise City Ordinance No. 1400.10 Parking, Stopping, Standing and Loading from the six consecutive hour parking regulation to a 12 consecutive hour parking period. In 2004, a resident on Sunnyside Road suggested changing the Ordinance from six hours to 12 hours. The requestor indicated that their family has three cars, one garage, and a difficult driveway and requested to lengthen the duration of on- street parking to twelve hours. The traffic safety committee recommended denial of the request, and, at the September 21, 2004 meeting, the Council directed staff to further study the issue. Recently, another request was received to revise the on- street parking regulation to lengthen the allowable parking duration due to limitations of parking within the requestor's garage and driveway. Parking restrictions on local streets are established by the local jurisdictional agency (e.g. the City of Edina). The first reading of the City Ordinance restricting on- street parking took place in 1965. The minutes noted that a lengthy discussion ensued (but none of the discussion was recorded in the minutes). The issue of on- street parking was discussed again on October 2, 1967 and the previous Mayor indicated that he did not believe the streets should be used for parking except under controlled conditions. Again, on May 3, 1971 on- street parking was addressed and it was stated that cars should be kept off the streets for aesthetic reasons. The previous Mayor indicated that cars should be kept off the street but at nights only. Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 1 of 3 September 6, 2005 It is the staffs experience and opinion that the 6 -hour limitation was most likely derived from the desire to limit parking on local streets, especially within residential neighborhoods that are adjacent to commercial areas and park and ride areas to prevent workers with the typical 8 -hour shift from parking within these neighborhoods. It should be noted that the six -hour citywide parking restriction in Edina is typically enforced based upon complaint driven requests. It is staffs opinion that changing the ordinance to allow parking for up to twelve consecutive hours should not have an adverse impact on the City. It should be noted that from November 1st through April 1st, there would continue to be restrictive street parking when a one -inch snowfall occurs. Therefore, a twelve -hour parking limit would not affect snowfall street maintenance. Areas that would desire and /or continue to have the need to restrict parking to a six -hour period could be dealt with on a case by case basis (e.g. where commercial parking is experienced in residential neighborhoods). Staff recommends revision of City Ordinance No. 1400.10 Parking, Stopping, Standing and -Loading from the six consecutive hour parking regulation to a 12 consecutive hour parking period. 2. Request to relocate parking restrictions that were in place adjacent to the bus stop that was located near the old Arby's on France Avenue between West 50th. Street and West 51St Street. The request is to relocate the parking restrictions to,the new bus stop location on France Avenue south of West 49 -1/2 Street approximately 100 -feet. The bus stop was relocated due to the construction in the southwest quadrant of West 50th Street and France Avenue. Currently, temporary no parking signs are in place adjacent to the new bus stop. It is anticipated that the new bus stop will remain upon the completion of the indicated construction and not be relocated back to the original location south of West 50th Street. Staff recommends installing permanent no parking signs on the west side of France Avenue from West 49 -1/2 Street to approximately 100 - ft south of the intersection to the bus stop location. SECTION B: Requests that staff recommends denial of request: None for the September 6, 2005 meeting. Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 2 of 3 September 6, 2005 SECTION C: Requests that are deferred to a later date or referred to others: 1. Request to install an ALL -WAY STOP at Interlachen Boulevard and Blake Road (north intersection). Staff recommends continuing this issue for further evaluation. 2. Request to remove the right turn on red restrictions currently in place at the intersection of Interlachen Boulevard and Vernon Avenue. The current restrictions were put in place at the request of a resident on Brookside Avenue indicating that is was very difficult to turn onto Interlachen Boulevard from Brookside Avenue, especially during rush hour traffic. The current restrictions prevent westbound traffic on Vernon from turning right -on -red Monday through Friday from 6:00 -9:00 a.m. and 4:00 -6:00 p.m. The signs were installed by the County approximately one year ago at the City's request to help create a gap in the traffic on Interlachen Boulevard to help minimize the delay of vehicles waiting to turn from Brookside Avenue onto Interlachen Boulevard. The intersection of Brookside Avenue with Interlachen Boulevard is approximately 400 -feet northwest of the Vernon / Interlachen intersection. Vernon Avenue is a county road and Interlachen Boulevard is classified as a "B "- Minor Arterial. The average daily traffic on Brookside Avenue is 3,653 vehicles. The average daily traffic on Interlachen Boulevard northwest of Vernon Avenue is 11,840 vehicles and 18,000 vehicles per day on Vernon Avenue. Since the turning restrictions were installed, staff has monitored the intersection to ensure safety is being maintained. Although the restrictions may help reduce the delay of turning traffic from Brookside Avenue, it has been observed that the restrictions have increased queuing lengths of vehicles, most noticeably in the westbound Vernon Avenue traffic. Traffic is backing up into the adjacent intersections and sometimes into the southbound exit ramp of Highway 100. Staff feels that the right turn prohibitions need to be removed due to the negative safety impacts and to improve vehicle flow at the immediate intersection. Vernon Avenue is a County Road and the Hennepin County Transportation Department has jurisdiction over this intersection. The City does not have the authority to revise traffic control at this intersection. Staff recommends referring the request to the County Transportation Department to remove the Right Turn Restrictions currently in place at the intersection of Vernon Ave and Inaterlachen Blvd. for westbound Vernon traffic. Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 3 of 3 September 6, 2005 REPORT %RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Wayne Houle, PE City Engineer Date: September 20, 2005 Subject: Approve Resolution for Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Grant Agreement Recommendation: Agenda Item # V. D. Consent Information Only. ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Adopt resolution 2005 -86, entering into Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Agreement and authorize the Mayor to sign said agreement. See attached agreement. Info /Background: The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has submitted the attached agreement for a grant of $13,953.00 to help supplement the costs of the Arden Park Canoe Access and West 54th Street Beautification Improvement. City Council awarded this project on May 17, 2005; the project is approximately 99% complete. This grant will help reduce the City's cost from $47,200 to $33,250. Staff and legal council has reviewed the agreement and recommends approval of this agreement. WEngineering \Contract Numbers\2005\ENG 05-6 Arden Park Canoe Access & W 54th Beautification Imprv\ADMIN \Misc \MCWD grant \092005 RR MCWD Agreement.doc GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN NIINNERAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT and THE CITY OF EDINA This Grant Agreement is entered into between the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, a public body with powers set forth at Minnesota Statutes §§ 103B and 103D ( "MCWD "), and the City of Edina, Minnesota, a Minnesota statutory city ( "GRANTEE "). Scope of Work GRANTEE will perform the work described in the permit application for the Arden Park Project received January 26, 2005 and attached as Exhibit A (the "Work "), which is incorporated into this Agreement and binding on GRANTEE as a term hereof. The MCWD and its duly authorized representatives shall have the right to inspect the work of GRANTEE and all materials pertaining thereto at the MCWD's discretion. The MCWD must be notified of any changes in the Work. 2. Grant Award The MCWD awards GRANTEE $13,953.00 to supplement the costs of the City of Edina Arden Park Project for items related to water quality and stream bank restoration. These funds represent the fund balance of the Pamela Park Project, a previously constructed joint project between the MCWD and the GRANTEE, which is complete and for which financial obligations have been met. If GRANTEE fails to complete the Work in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, the MCWD may withhold any portion of the award not yet paid, may require reimbursement of that portion already paid, and may have any available action at law or equity for that purpose. A report describing the work performed and documenting expenditures of grant funds shall be provided by GRANTEE to the MCWD following completion of the Work. GRANTEE shall maintain all expenditure records for five years from the date of completion of the Work. The MCWD may examine, audit, and copy any such records during normal business hours. 3. Independent Contractor The MCWD's role under this Agreement is solely to provide funds to support the performance of work that furthers the purposes of the watershed law. GRANTEE acts independently and selects the means, method and manner of performing the Work. Nothing herein contained is intended or should be construed to constitute GRANTEE as the agent, representative, employee or contractor of the MCWD in any manner. Personnel performing the Work on behalf of GRANTEE or a contractor shall not be considered employees of the MCWD and shall not be entitled to any compensation, rights or benefits of any kind from the MCWD. Any and all claims arising under economic security, employment or workers' compensation laws of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said personnel, and any and all claims on behalf of any such personnel arising out of employment or alleged employment, including without limitation, claims of discrimination against GRANTEE, its officers, agents, contractors or employees, shall not be the responsibility of the MCWD. GRANTEE shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the MCWD, its officers, agents and employees, from any and all such claims. Each contractor 9 hired by GRANTEE shall be an independent contractor for the purposes of performing the Work and each agreement between GRANTEE and a contractor shall so state. 4. Contract and Assignment GRANTEE shall not assign, contract or transfer any obligation or interest in this Agreement or any of the Work without the written consent of the MCWD. Written consent to any contract shall not relieve GRANTEE from its responsibility to perform the Work or any other responsibility under this Agreement. 5. Indemnification GRANTEE shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the MCWD, its officers, board members, employees and agents from any and all actions, costs, damages and liabilities of any nature to the degree they are the result of GRANTEE's, a contractor's or an assignee's negligence or the result of another action or inaction by GRANTEE, a contractor or an assignee that is the basis for GRANTEE's, the contractor's or an assignee's liability in law or equity. 6. Termination The Agreement shall remain in force until completion of the obligations hereunder unless earlier terminated as set forth herein. The MCWD may terminate this Agreement at its convenience, by a written termination notice stating specifically for what as -yet uncompleted work it will award funds and in what amount. GRANTEE shall receive full award for all authorized work performed to the date of cancellation, except that GRANTEE shall not be compensated for any part performance of a specified task if termination is due to GRANTEE's breach of this Agreement. The MCWD, without penalty or interest, may withhold the sum in question if it asserts this failure as the basis for termination, until the required payment is finally determined. 7. Acknowledgment Any publicly distributed or displayed printed or electronic documents or other text display concerning the Work prepared by GRANTEE with MCWD funds shall properly acknowledge the funding provided by the MCWD. 8. PrpRM of MCWD All property furnished to or for the use of GRANTEE or a contractor by the MCWD, and all property purchased by GRANTEE with grant funds; with the exception of plant materials, including but not limited to equipment, supplies and documents, both hard copy and electronic, shall remain the property of the MCWD and returned to the MCWD at the conclusion of the Work, or sooner if requested by the MCWD. GRANTEE further agrees that any proprietary materials are the exclusive property of the MCWD and shall assert no right, title or interest in the materials. GRANTEE shall not disseminate, furnish, sell, transfer or dispose of any proprietary data to any other person or entity unless specifically authorized in writing by the MCWD. Any property supplied to GRANTEE by the MCWD or deriving from the MCWD is supplied to and accepted by GRANTEE as without representation or warranty including but not limited to a warranty of fitness, merchantability, accuracy or completeness. N 9. Compliance with Laws GRANTEE shall comply with the laws and requirements of all federal, state, local and other governmental units in connection with performing the Work, and shall procure all licenses, permits and other rights necessary to perform the Work, including all permits required by the MCWD. At all times during the term of this Agreement, GRANTEE shall have and keep in force workers' compensation insurance in accordance with legal requirements applicable to GRANTEE. In its performance of the Work, GRANTEE shall ensure that no person shall be excluded from full employment rights or participation in or the benefits of any program, service or activity on the ground of race, color, creed, religion, age, sex, disability, marital status, sexual orientation, public assistance status or national origin; and no person who is protected by applicable federal or state laws, rules or regulations against discrimination otherwise shall be subjected to discrimination. 10. Continuation of Obligation It is understood and agreed that obligations to defend, indemnify and hold harmless; and document retention requirements shall survive the completion of the Work and the term of this Agreement. 11. Notices Any written communication required under this Agreement shall be addressed to the other party as follows: To MCWD: Eric Evenson, Administrator Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 18202 Minnetonka Blvd. Deephaven, MN 55391 To GRANTEE: Wayne Houle, City Engineer City of Edina 4801 W. 50'b Street Edina, MN 55424 Either of the above individuals may in writing designate another individual to receive communications under this Agreement. 12. Waiver The MCWD's failure to insist on the strict performance of any obligation under this Agreement, or to exercise any option, remedy or right herein, shall not waive or relinquish the MCWD's right in the future to insist on strict performance of that or any other obligation. The MCWD's waiver of a breach of an obligation of this Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver of any subsequent breach of that or any other obligation. A waiver must be in writing and signed by the MCWD. Notwithstanding any other term of this Agreement, the MCWD waives no immunities in tort. This Agreement creates no rights in and waives no immunities with respect to any third party. 13. Venue and Jurisdiction This Agreement shall be construed under and governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. The appropriate venue and jurisdiction for any legal action hereunder shall be Hennepin County, Minnesota. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, intending to be legally bound, the parties hereto execute and deliver this Agreement. THE CITY OF EDINA Lo Its Subscribed and sworn to before me this _ day of , 2005. Notary Public F11 THE MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT LM Its Subscribed and sworn before me this _ day of , 2005. Notary Public Exhibit A ti j Temporary Plant Protection Fence Turf Grass Rock Construction Entrance: 3 Quercus macrocarpa . to be field located by Project 17' 15' CMP N v= 86 t . a & - - L� &cape Architect top of N v= Match grade oft 861.9 a e = see project specifications path to top of adjacent - incidental to costs project i Bridge id .` ? 39 Ratibida pinnata 12" o.c. 1 ,. �. ,� , - ..... �, :... • �., J V =863.8 _ _ _ - -- _ -- _ -- - INV =863.8 `,� MP a~i ?S,•t l7' 15' ADS •: lis lhier aev :' 3 Ameanc INV =863.3 5 Q, + .; :., �, ti. •. .'. 1 = 86.07 Q S ort Live Stakes ...:. <;k;: ' ' ,::: •`• : _ ISO Split Rail Fencec' �Tr A�!' by Project L.A. �] Rinngarden Limit 6 t Wads - to be field located 23 Silphium perfoliatum, Raingarden imit 18" o.c. 3 Amelanchier laevis M i n n e h ha. Creek „ Bench ,:..:... Vii..`:, ,. r�•: ' ,. 102 F 'a vesca, 12" o.c. 37 Aster azureus 12" o.c. �fi�• 41 Fragaria esca, 12" o.c. op 4 Rows of compost logs with short live stak Add Alternate - Field Located by L.A. _ �. :: >. • ;'' 3 aria vesca, 12" o.c._ + KEY O r ; ".- Seeded 12 Compost Log (Compost Log " „ �,• •„����' Native Seeding in Compost B et 46 C t n vv -? • across path to be removed upon completion ® 12" Compost Log (Temporary osion Control) �3:: ; s': i of construction) 6 1 4" deep, 48" wide Crushed Compost Logs with Live Stakes dd Alternate) =.;h. Concrete ituminous Path e U �, ® Tempon�ry Plant Protection Fence .'•?�;:`, ;, -, Compacted to ASTM Proctor 95 ® Split Rail Fence Native S gin Compost ` �' %; 1% cross slope facing downhill Live Stakes ®Short f— Flotation Silt Curtain Rain Garden GENERAL NOTES: Benches ' ±;'; 0 Plugs I. See raingarden specifications and drawings for excavation, soil, and plant specr .,.�:::f..: Canoe Access Dock - to • Turf Crass 2. See specifications for seed lists. ; r, be field located by W 3. Crushed concrete bituminous for path shall be supplied by Owner for installation by Contractor. '` _ •• • Project L.A. 4. Six foot free standing ark benches 3 supplied b Owner to be installed Contractor r x :,•••• 20 0 20 8 P () PP • Y by per Short Live Stakes 4 Z w - - Manufacturer's recommendations on surface of 6" crushed bituminous provided by Owner. Benches Q C) N supplied shall be Minncor Industries item # 1077707300. of Vu eaa REPORURECOMMENDATION To:, MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item V.E. From: GORDON L. HUGHES CITY MANAGER Date: SEPTEMBER 20, 2005 Subject: INSURANCE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ INFORMATIONBACKGROUND: To HRA To Council Motion Resolution Ordinance Discussion At a recent City Council Meeting a request was put forth that the City solicit proposals for insurance agent services to facilitate purchase of the City's commercial insurance. The Council asked that this matter be placed on the Agenda. The agents that represent the City, in the insurance market are responsible for completing all renewal forms and assisting in the management of the City's coverage for Workers' Compensation, General Liability, Liquor Liability, Pollution Liability, Inland Marine, Employee Benefit Liability, Employee Practices Liability, Law Enforcement Liability, Public Officials Liability, Auto Physical Damage and Property Insurance to a value of $83,515,129. b p Over the years with the market for public commercial insurance shrinking the City has gone from having four different agents providing service to the City. to the two agents of record today. It is because of the lack of public insurance that the, League of 1 0 Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) was formed, and it is a distinction that the City Edina has been able to maintain mo9t of its insurance coverage without being forced to go to the League. Both Harris - Homeyer and Anon have served as the.City's agents of record for about 25 years. They have provided and continue to, provide excellent service. They have through the years been available with a. phone call and have served the City well beyond expectations in times when it appeared that there would be no insurance coverage available (Prior to the formation of the LMCIT). If the Council wishes to proceed, staff should be directed to prepare and disseminate a Request for Proposals (RFP) to the insurance agent community. (A copy of the RFP used last year by the City of Burnsville is attached, for your reference.) Attachment o n o 1 n 2 r. CITY OF BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR INSURANCE AGENT SERVICES CITY OF BURNSVILLE FINANCE DEPARTMENT 100 CIVIC CENTER PARKWAY BURNSVILLE, MN 55337 -3817 WWW.BURNSVILLE.ORG OCTOBER, 2004 III. IV. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION A. Introduction and General Information B. Scope of Work ................................................................ C. Qualifications D. Fees E. Rights of Review ............................................................. INSTRUCTIONS ......... ..:........................... ............................... A. Proposal Submission ........................................................ B. Schedule AFFIRMATIVE ACTION ........................... ............................... CONTRACT EXECUTION ........................ ............................... A. Negotiations and Contract Execution ................................. B. Contracting Ethics..--• ............................................................. .......................... 1 . ............:............. 1 ......................... 1 1 ............................ 2 ........... ............................... ............ .... ......... ............ .• - - -2 ------------------------------------ ------ 2 ........................ .................. 3 ........... ............................... 3 .------------ ----------- ---------- •--- - - - -.3 3 ........................................... City of Burnsville, RFP Page 1 I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND A. Introduction and General Information The City of Burnsville's insurance coverage for property, liability, automobile, and workers' compensation is provided by the League of Minnesota Insurance Trust ( LMCIT). LMCIT requires cities to use the services of an agent to assist and advise a city on their insurance coverage. Burnsville invites written proposals from insurance agencies to act as the agent of record for the LMCIT policies that will be renewed January 4, 2005. The agent of record will be determined by the fee proposed (in lieu of a commission) and the qualifications of the insurance agency and their staff. B. Scope of Work The insurance agency will be responsible for the following: 1. Completion of the LMCIT renewal forms based on the data supplied by the City. 2. Review of the LMCIT insurance polices for completeness and accuracy. Confirms that the have been updated for the new data supplied during the renewal process. 3. Provides explanations of insurance coverage, coverage options and make recommendations as requested. 4. Issue certificates of insurance as needed. 5. Perform other duties customarily handled by an insurance agent and agreed upon by both the City and agent. C. Qualifications The insurance agency shall demonstrate their experience and qualifications by including in their proposal the following information: 1. Number of years the agency has been in business. 2. Names of governmental entities insured by the agency through the LMCIT during the last five years. 3. Detail the name(s), qualifications, experience, and professional designations of the agency's staff proposed to service the City's account. 4. Agency premium volume excluding personal lines of coverage (health, life, etc.). 5. Present limit of errors and omissions coverage in place for the agency. 6. Describe any other agency resources or special qualifications that would be advantageous to the City. City of Burnsville, RFP Page 2 D. Fees The insurance agency shall indicate -in its proposal the fee required to service the City's LMCIT insurance coverage for the policy periods of: January 4, 2005 — January 3, 2006 January 4, 2006 — January 3, 2007 January 4, 2007 — January 3, 2008 January 4,.2008 — January 3, 2009 January 4, 2009 — January 3, 2010 The fee proposed is in lieu of a commission. It is anticipated that the agent will be appointed for a minimum of a five year period.. An annual review process will be required with the understanding that the City or Agent reserves the right to cancel the contract with a 30 -day written notice. E. Rights of Review The City of Burnsville reserves the right to reject any or all proposals or to request additional information from any or all applicants as determined to be in the best interest of the City. II. INSTRUCTIONS A. Proposal Submission Two (2) copies of the Proposal shall be submitted to: Steve Olstad Financial Operations Director City of Burnsville 100 Civic Center Parkway Burnsville, MN 55337 -3817 952.895.4481 steve.olstad@ci.burnsville.mn.us All responses, questions, and correspondence should be directed to Steve Olstad. B. Schedule 1. City mails Request for Proposal .......................................................... October 1, 2004 2. Proposal due date_____________________________________________ _______________________________ October 15, 2004 3. Review of RFP's completed /Finalist interviews scheduled ................ October. 22, 2004 4. Interviews October 25 — October 29, 2004 ..................................... ............................... 5. Final decision /Contract negotiation . .......................... .......................November 5, 2004 6. Contract consideration by the City Council ..................................... November 15, 2004 NOTE: ALL STATEMENTS OF PROPOSAL MUST BE RECEIVED BY OCTOBER 15. 2004, AT BURNSVILLE CITY HALL NO LATER THAN 4:00 P.M. City of Burnsville, RFP Page 3 III. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION r' The City of Burnsville requires affirmative action and, therefore, the agency selected shall not discriminate under the contract against any person in accordance with federal, state, and local regulations. City of Burnsville Affirmative Action Policy The City of Burnsville, Minnesota, has adopted a policy that it will not discriminate in employment practices on the basis of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, public assistance status, veteran status, handicap or disability, that it has agreed to take affirmative action to recruit minorities, women and handicapped persons into its employment, and that it will transact business only with firms who have adopted similar non - discriminatory and affirmative action policies. IV. CONTRACT EXECUTION The information below is being provided as part of this Request for Proposal to give proposers an understanding of the City's expectations with respect to contract execution. A. Negotiations and Contract Execution The City reserves the right to negotiate the final terms and conditions of the contract to be executed. Should the City and agency be unable to agree upon the entire contract, the City reserves the right to discontinue negotiations, select another agency, or reject all of the proposals. Upon completion of negotiations agreeable to the City and the agency, a contract shall be executed. B. Contracting Ethics No elected official or employee of the City of Burnsville who exercises any responsibilities in the review, approval, or implementation of the proposal shall participate in any decision, which affects his or her direct or indirect financial interests. 2. It is a breach of ethical standards for any'person to offer, give, or agree to give any City of Burnsville employee or Council person, or for any City of Burnsville employee or Council person to solicit, demand, accept, or agree to accept from another person or firm, a gratuity or an offer of employment whenever a reasonable prudent person would conclude that such consideration was motivated by an individual, group or corporate. desire to obtain special, preferential, or more favorable treatment than is normally accorded the general public. 3. The agency shall not assign any interest in this contract and shall not transfer any interest in the same without the prior written consent of the City. 4. The agency shall not accept any private client or project which, by nature, places it in ethical conflict during its representation of the City of Burnsville. Ilk • ,v V • REPORURECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: CHERYL ENGELMAN CITY SANITARIAN Date: SEPTEMBER 15, 2005 Subject: GRANT FOR CITIES READINESS INITIATIVE Agenda Item # V.F Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council ❑ Motion ® Resolution . ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution authorizing the City of .Edina to enter into„ an agreement with Minnesota Department of Health to accept funding for Cities Readiness Initiative (CRI). o INFORMAT.ION/BACKGROUND: The City of Edina will receive $14,340 in grant money from the State of Minnesota for the grant term September 1, 2005 - August 31, 2006 to improve mass dispensing capacity of medicines and medical supplies during a large scale public health emergency in the Twin Cities area. CRI is handled separately under the Public Health Emergency Preparedness contract with the City of Bloomington. This is the second year that Edina has received CRI grant money. 0 0 @ h 51, RESOLUTION NO 2005 -84 0 \n�bHron.��`�• 0 4 Cit,T Of Edina AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF EDINA TO ENTER INTO A CITIES READINESS INITIATIVE GRANT AGREEMENT WITH MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH WHEREAS, the STATE, pursuant to Minnesota Statute 144.0742 is empowered to enter into a contractual agreement for provision of statutorily prescribed public health services; WHEREAS, the STATE and the City of Edina have entered into master grant contract number 12- 700 -00078 effective January 1, 2004; WHEREAS, the STATE has received Cities Readiness Initiative (CRI) funds from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to improve mass dispensing capacity in the Twin Cities metropolitan area. The inclusion of expansion counties is intended to further support a public health response in the urban core area; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina represents that it is duly qualified and willing to perform the services set forth,in the agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Edina City Council that the Mayor and the City Manager enter into an Agreement with Minnesota Department of Health to accept funding for Cities Readiness Initiative. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 20, 2005, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. ° WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20. Cj t1 7 C h-rlk City Hall o 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET a FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 1-4 1 (1 AM LW •,� v • REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: CHERYL ENGELMAN CITY SANITARIAN Date: SEPTEMBER 15, 2005 Agenda Item # V.G Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: GRANT FOR PUBLIC ❑ Motion HEALTH PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE TO BIOTERRORISM ® Resolution. ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution authorizing the City of Edina to enter into an agreement with Minnesota Department of Health to accept funding for Public Health Preparedness and Response to Bioterrorism. INFORMATION/BACKGROUND: The City of Edina will receive $58,226 in grant money from the State of Minnesota for the grant term September 1, 2005- August 31, 2006 to prepare for and respond to bioterrorism, infectious diseases, and other threats to public health. The grant money pays for the Public Health Emergency Preparedness contract agreement with the City of Bloomington to fulfill grant duty requirements. This is the fourth year that Edina has received the grant. 0 n RESOLUTION NO 2005 -85 Citj7 of Edina AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF EDINA TO ENTER INTO A PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE TO BIOTERRORISM GRANT AGREEMENT WITH MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH WHEREAS, the STATE, pursuant to Minnesota Statute 144.0742 is empowered to enter into a contractual agreement for provision of statutorily prescribed public health services; WHEREAS, the STATE and the City of Edina have entered into master grant contract number 12- 700 -00078 effective January 1, 2004; WHEREAS, the STATE has received funds from the Centers for Disease Control and prevention to assess and enhance the capacity of the state and local public health departments to respond to bioterrorism, infectious diseases, and other threats to public health; and WHEREAS,' the City of Edina represents that it is duly qualified and willing to perform the services set forth in the agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Edina City Council that the Mayor and the City Manager, enter into an Agreement with Minnesota Department of Health to accept funding for Public Health Preparedness and Response to Bioterrorism. ATTEST: City Clerk I Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 20, 2005, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_. City Clerk City Hall 952- 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 � r . R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 276111 9/8/2005 276112 9/8/2005 276113 9/8/2005 276114 9/812005 276115 9/8/2005 276116 918/2005 276117 9/812005 276118 918/2005 CITY OF EDINA 9!712005 15:35:09 Council Check Register Page - 1 918/2005 -918/2005 Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 101833 A.T.O.M. 650.00 LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING 119438 3064107 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 650.00 102403 AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT 63.90 SOD 119514 22992 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 63.90 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 57.40 119575 467973 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING ' 65.96 119576 467953 5862.5515 - COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX - VERNON SELLING 63.96 119577 467976 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 27.00 119578 467922 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 112.36 119579 467975 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 41.00 119807 467925 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 367.68 100614 ACE SUPPLY CO. INC. 43.21 ACCESS DOOR 119651 675429 1551.6530 REPAIR PARTS CITY HALL GENERAL` 171.89 COLLAR, NAILOR 119652 67510 1551.6530 REPAIR PARTS CITY HALL GENERAL 32.65 CLASS B ELL 119653 674751 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 528.83 PIPE, CONDUIT, COLLARS 119654 673046 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 776.58 105162 ADT SECURITY SERVICES - 26.39 ALARM SERVICE 119515 01241743 5111.6250 ALARM SERVICE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 26.39 102191 ADVANCED GRAPHIC SYSTEMS INC. 736.72 TONER CARTRIDGES 119709 INV00063009 1550.6466 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 736.72 102626 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES 470.20 READY MIX 119516 4124931 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 893.38 READY MIX 119517 4125153 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 964.20 READY MIX 119518 4124686 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 2,327.78 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 31.47 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 119655 67594 5311.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL OPERATION 31.47 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 917/2005 15:35:09 Council Check Register Page - 2 9/8/2005 -918/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 276.119 9/812005 103357 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO 1,966.64 EDITING SYSTEM HARDWARE 119476 _ SYSINVO4204 2210.6711 NEW EQUIPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 1,966.64 276120 91812005 114341 AMAZON.COM CREDIT 99.80 INVESTIGATION BOOKS 119437 PO 3181 1400.6405 BOOKS & PAMPHLETS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 99.80 276121 918/2005 116301 AMERICAN COLOR GRAPHICS 188.07 FALL CATALOG 119519 38843 5110.6235 POSTAGE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,369.00 FALL CATALOG 119519 38843 5110.6575 PRINTING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,557.07 276122 918/2005 101506 AMERICAN HOTEL REGISTER CO. 175.31 BENCH PEDESTALS 119656 4510820 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 175.31 276123 9/812005 100630 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC. 107.37 COPIER PAPER 119871 10020216 -00 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 107.37 COPIER PAPER 119871 10020216 -00 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 143.17 COPIER PAPER 119871 10020216 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 357.91 276124 9/8/2005 102171 ANDERSON -JOHNSON ASSOCIATES 2,257.00 ARCHITECT SERVICES 119872 0505401080 47036.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT RENOVATE BRAEMAR PARK FIELD 743.48 ARCHITECT SERVICES 119873 050540805 47036.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT RENOVATE BRAEMAR PARK FIELD 3,000.48 276125 91812005 100326 ANDERSON, PETER 62.40 SAW RENTAL 119657 082305 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 62.40 276126 91812005 .118700 ANDERSON, ROBERT 38.63 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 119750 090205 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 38.63 276127 91812005 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 887.36 FOOD 119710 437884 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 887.36 276128 91812005 102134 ASHWORTH INC. 1,098.86 MERCHANDISE 119711 691746 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES f ) � r R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/812005 -9/8/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledoer Account DescdDtion 9/7/2005 15:35:09 Page - 3 Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,098.86 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 276129 91812005 YORK SELLING 101954 AUGIE'S INC. YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 53.34 FOOD 119712 25157 5430.5510 53.34 276130 9/812005 100877 AUTO MACHINE AND SUPPLY CO. 18.08 TRAILER HITCH WIRING 119751 D -78169 5630.6406 18.08 276131 918/2005 102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC. 51.57 BATTERY 119752 24482 1553.6530 51.57 276132 918/2005 102257 BEACHS AWARDS 209.25 PLAQUES 119713 083005 5410.6122 209.25 276133 91812005 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 1,445.70 119580 34424300 5862.5513 152.39 119581 40428500 5862.5515 11.50 119582 40440100 5862.5515 637.00 119583 34383600 5822.5513 131.00- 119808 34390100 5842.5513 113.18 119809 40469600 5842.5515 131.10 119810 34390200 5842.5513 367.40 119811 34424500 5862.5512 5.40 119812 40428400 5862.6406 97.64 119813 40461500 5862.5515 2,830.31 276134 9/812005 100661 BENN, BRADLEY 70.97 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 119658 082305 5111.6406 70.97 276135 9/8/2005 105833 BERGERSON - CASWELL INC. 2,740.00 WELL LEVEL MONITOR 119439 156030000 5911.6180 2,740.00 276136 9/8/2005 105833 BERGERSON - CASWELL INC. 3,450.00 WELL LEVEL MONITOR 119440 156020000 05429.1705.30 3,450.00 9/7/2005 15:35:09 Page - 3 Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER WELL #7 REHAB 91712005 15:35:09 Page - 4 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL ENGINEERING GENERAL ENGINEERING GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FINANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN STREET REVOLVING PKWOOD KNOLLS 26TH PRIVATE BA -321 VALLEY VIEW - WOODDALE RANT 119758 090105 1000 2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 300.00 OUT OF COUNTY WAR 300.00 276142 9/812005 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 119814 41811 5842 5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,500.00 CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 276143 91812005 100681 CATCO Council Check Register 83.12 COUPLER 119477 3 -83324 1553.6530 9/8/2005 - 9/8/2005 CREDIT Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1 -62856 276137 91812005 REPAIR PARTS 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS HOSE ENDS 119760 1-62734 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 29.38 OFFICE SUPPLIES 119441 WO374054 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 89.03 OFFICE SUPPLIES 119441 WO374054 -1 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 47.67 OFFICE SUPPLIES 119442 WO- 374813 -1 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 6.71 PENS 119443 WO374212 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 127.93 TIMECARD STORAGE BOXES 119443 WO- 374212 -1 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 61.45 VINYL WALLETS, FOLDERS 119444 OE4037 -1 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 6.75- CREDIT 119520 CP -IN 4083500 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 355.42 276138 91812005 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 569.11 DRUMS, SEALS, SHOES 119753 781689 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 147.00 RESERVOIR 119754 781513 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 33.58 LUBE FILTERS 119755 783050 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 140.87- CREDIT 119756 CM781689 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 608.82 276139 9/8/2005 103820 BRANDENBURG, HEIDI 28.00 PARKING PERMIT REFUND 119757 090205 4090.4751 PARKING PERMITS 28.00 276140 918/2005 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 69.80 SOIL TESTING 119445 250503 01102.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 44.80 MATERIAL TESTING 119446 250516 01321.1705.21 - CONSULTING INSPECTION 114.60 276141 91812005 108517 CARVER COUNTY 91712005 15:35:09 Page - 4 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL ENGINEERING GENERAL ENGINEERING GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FINANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN STREET REVOLVING PKWOOD KNOLLS 26TH PRIVATE BA -321 VALLEY VIEW - WOODDALE RANT 119758 090105 1000 2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 300.00 OUT OF COUNTY WAR 300.00 276142 9/812005 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 119814 41811 5842 5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,500.00 1,500.00 276143 91812005 100681 CATCO 83.12 COUPLER 119477 3 -83324 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 70.29- CREDIT 119521 3 -83571 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 60.36 FITTINGS 119759 1 -62856 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 29.61 HOSE ENDS 119760 1-62734 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 102.80 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN - EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 COMMUNICATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY OF EDINA MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS Council Check Register 9/8/2005 --918/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 276144 91812005 118691 CENTENNIAL LAKES IV, LLC 11,610.00 PAINT PARK RAILINGS 119659_ 082405 5630.6180 11,610.00 276145 9/8/2005 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 624.12- 119714 083005 1646.6186 485.89- 119714 083005 5913.6186 327.08- 119714 083005 1552.6186 243.08- 119714 083005 1628.6186 241.11- 119714 083005 1470.6186 203.79- 119714 083005 5630.6186 199.36- 119714 083005 5420.6186 69.35- 119714 083005 5422.6186 56.68- 119714 083005 5111.6186 54.85- 119714 083005 1481.6186 44.00- 119714 083005 5861.6186 24.77- 119714 083005 5841.6186 14.39- 119714 083005 5821.6186 .43- 119714 083005 5430.6186 54.01 119714 083005 5210.6186 288.71 119714 083005 5911.6186 6,078.33 119714 083005 5511.6186 3,832.15 276146 9/812005 101223 CITIES FORD 32.17 LAMP ASSEMBLY 119761 118921WFOW 1553.6530 32.17 276147 9/8/2005 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 15,601.26 SPECIAL ASSESS -MN DRIVE 119660 32792 3066.1234 15,601.26 276148 9/8/2005 101345 COLOURS 200.00 MASTHEAD DESIGN 119762 9394 -02 2210.6103 1,050.00 POWERPOINT TEMPLATE 119763 9388 2210.6103 8,032.50 SUMMER ABOUT BUSINESS 119764 9356 -8 2210.6123 4,153.50 ABOUT BUSINESS PRINTING 119765 9356 -A 2210.6123 13,436.00 276149 9/8/2005 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 87.60 HARD HATS 119522 02647583 1301.6610 265.80 GLOVES, EAR PLUGS 119523 02634686 1301.6610 Subledger Account Description CONTRACTED REPAIRS HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT REPAIR PARTS 917/2005 15:35:09 Page - 5 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES BUILDING MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION CENT SVC PW BUILDING SENIOR CITIZENS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENTENNIAL LAKES CLUB HOUSE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT YORK FIRE STATION VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY RICHARDS GOLF COURSE GOLF DOME PROGRAM PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SPECIAL ASSESSMENT BLOOMINGTONBR #2 BALANCE SHEET PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE CITY OF EDINA 9/72005 15:35:09 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page- 6 9/8/2005 - 9/8/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 150.81 GLOVES, EYE WASH 119524 02646610 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 90.12 EAR PLUGS 119525 02635757 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 90.12- RETURN 119526 02647116 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 504.21 276150 9182005 104948 CONTINENTAL RESEARCH CORPORATI 400.74 DEGREASER 119478 230340 -CRC -1 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING - 400.74 276151 9182005 102596 CROWN TROPHY - 460.08 CASTING - KIOSK 119874 6282 4704.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES _ PARK MEMORIALS 460.08 276152 9182005 103485 CURT KRIENS CONSTRUCTION 7,207.50 AUDUBON KIOSK 119875 1121 4704.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK MEMORIALS 7,207.50 276153 9/8/2005 103985 DAVE'S GREAT AD SHOP 100.00 AD REDESIGN 119766 1930 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS - 100.00 276154 9/812005 100712 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT 169.07 REPAIRS 119767 3311385 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 169.07 276155 9/8/2005 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING 2,050.65 119584 328746 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 40.60 119585 328747 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 820.00 119586 328568 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 19.80 119587 328745 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,716.88 119588 328744 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 4,382.50 119815 328743 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 410.00 119816 328565 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 9,440.43 276156 91812005 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 17.08 HAND TOOLS 119768 799517 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 13.18 HAND TOOLS 119769 799783 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 6.79 HAND TOOLS 119770 795095 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 37.05 276157 91812005 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 5430.6188 5511.6188 5610.6122 5900.1211.1 TELEPHONE TELEPHONE ADVERTISING OTHER 9!7/2005 15:35:09 Page - 7 Business Unit GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS ED ADMINISTRATION ACCTS RECEIVABLE MANUAL UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 3101.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 281.56 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE R55CKREG LOG20000 5822.5513 276158 CITY OF EDINA 5842.5513 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST 5421.5514 Council Check Register GRILL 5842.5514 14.90 YORK SELLING 9/8/2005 -9/8/2005 119447 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 110.98 BAKERY 119715 198756 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 66.77 BAKERY 119716 1990.35 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 55.97 BAKERY 119717 199036 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 47.84 BAKERY 119718 199117 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5430.6188 5511.6188 5610.6122 5900.1211.1 TELEPHONE TELEPHONE ADVERTISING OTHER 9!7/2005 15:35:09 Page - 7 Business Unit GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS ED ADMINISTRATION ACCTS RECEIVABLE MANUAL UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 3101.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 281.56 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5822.5513 276158 9/812005 5842.5513 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 5842.5514 14.90 YORK SELLING 5822.5515 119447 202174260 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 128.00 119447 202174260 437.60 119448 202174299 580.50 2761.59 918/2005 118681 DOBBS, STEVE 608.02 OVERPAYMENT REFUND 119449 082905 608.02 276160 918 /2005 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 14,000.00 LEGAL 119527 1257696 14,000.00 276161 9/8/2005 100739 EAGLE WINE 543.74 119589 283572 916.47 119590 283575 323.32 119591 283577 1,783.53 276162 91812005 100741 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 193.00 119719 14914 5,808.65 119817 613082 11.00 119818 327311 3,025.40 119819 327313 9,038.05 276163 9/8/2005 100742 ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION DNISI 123.54 PEST CONTROL 119661 4946691 123.54 276164 918/2005 105467 EDINA CRIME PREVENTION FUND 3,470.00 CREDIT CARD RECEIPTS -ART FAIR 119528 083005 3,470.00 276165 918 /2005 118685 EDINA MORNINGSIDE COMMUNITY CH 5430.6188 5511.6188 5610.6122 5900.1211.1 TELEPHONE TELEPHONE ADVERTISING OTHER 9!7/2005 15:35:09 Page - 7 Business Unit GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS ED ADMINISTRATION ACCTS RECEIVABLE MANUAL UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 3101.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL DEBT SERVICE REVENUES 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/8/2005 -9/8/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 60 00 RENTAL REFUND 119529 083005 1600.4722.08 SHELTER BUILDING RENT GENERAL SUPPLIES 917/2005 15:35:09 Page- 8 Business Unit PARK ADMIN. GENERAL PLAYGROUND & THEATER MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS REPAIR PARTS LIFT STATION MAINT WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 60.00 COMMUNICATIONS WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS WEB DEVELOPMENT 276166 91812005 COMMUNICATIONS 102955 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS 147.38 TWINS GAME FIELD TRIP 119876 05 -069 1624.6406 147.38 276167 91812005 100593 EFFECTIVE MARKETING COMMUNICAT 300.00 ABOUT TOWN COLUMN 119479 280323 2210.6123 300.00 276168 91812005 118689 ELDER EYE PRESS & DESIGN 500.00 ABOUT TOWN DESIGN REVIEW 119663 08-31- 2005-01 2210.6123 500.00 276169 918/2005 100549 ELECTRIC PUMP INC. 304.60 IMPELLER, PLATE 119530 0029493 -IN 5921.6530 304.60 276170 9/812005 105339 ENRGI 162.50 WEBSITE CONSULTING 119480 3254 2210.6124 1,056.25 WEBSITE CONSULTING 119481 3253 2210.6124 130.00 WEBSITE CONSULTING 119482 3255 2210.6124 227.50 WEBSITE CONSULTING 119664 3268 2210.6124 825.00 WEBSITE CONSULTING 119665 3267 2210.6124 2.401.25 276171 9/812005 118120 ESCH CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY INC. 603.64 HAMMER DRILL 119531 418444 1314.6406 711.40 SAWBLADES 119662 418468 1314.6406 1,315.04 276172 9/8/2005 100752 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC. 1,083.11 ADJUSTING RINGS 119771 HH4414 5923.6406 1,083.11 276173 91812005 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 64.00 119820 338971 5862.5515 64.00 276174 91812005 100297 FAST FOTO & DIGITAL 23.16 FILM DEVELOPING 119532 T2- 209861 5610.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 917/2005 15:35:09 Page- 8 Business Unit PARK ADMIN. GENERAL PLAYGROUND & THEATER MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS REPAIR PARTS LIFT STATION MAINT WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES ED ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9!7/2005 15:35:09 Council Check Register Page - 9 9/8/2005 --9/8/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 105599 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO. 23.16 717.96 DENTAL PREMIUM 276175 9/8/2005 1550.6043 100756 FEDERAL EXPRESS 6,944.50 DENTAL PREMIUM 119533 090105 1550.6040 35.77 SHIPPING CHARGES 119772 5 -549 -32607 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 91812005 35.77 9.51 276176 9/8/2005 61859700 104474 FILTERFRESH 9.51 303.40 COFFEE 119773 99843 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 303.40 INTERPRETER 119450 42638 1400.6103 276177 9/8/2005 118703 FIRST RESPONSE TRAINING INC. 276181 918/2005 105932 GOPROMOS 46.00 CPR COURSE 119877 090205 1280.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 46.00 CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 276178 9/812005 105599 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO. 717.96 DENTAL PREMIUM 119533 090105 1550.6043 6,944.50 DENTAL PREMIUM 119533 090105 1550.6040 7,662.46 276179 91812005 100760 FOWLER ELECTRIC 9.51 REBUILD KIT 119774 61859700 1553.6530 9.51 276180 91812005 102419 GARDEN & ASSOCIATES INC 110.00 INTERPRETER 119450 42638 1400.6103 110.00 276181 918/2005 105932 GOPROMOS 168.20 PENCILS 119483 9043479 1552.6406 168.20 276182 918/2005 100781 GRAFIX SHOPPE 133.13 SQUAD GRAPHICS 119666 42887 1553.6180 133.13 276183 9/8/2005 101103 GRAINGER 28.71 MOUNTING BRACKET 119484 495. 696083 -7 1552.6530 69.26 WALL/CEILING FAN 119485 4956214995 1552.6530 176.63 VAPOR TIGHT FIXTURES 119534 498 - 716926 -7 7411.6103 35.72 SAW BLADES 119667 495 - 205066 -6 1301.6406 219.64 CAPSCREWS, BINS, WHEEL 119668 495 - 118746 -9 1325.6406 61.31 LAMPS, MULTIMETER 119720 495 - 891583 -9 5420.6406 COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING PSTF OCCUPANCY GENERAL MAINTENANCE STREET NAME SIGNS . CLUB HOUSE CITY OF EDINA 9/7/2005 15:35:09 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 10 9/8/2005 - 9/812005 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 25.47 LAMPS W/LAMP HOLDERS 119721 498 - 842343 -2 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 68.72 TAPE, ADHESIVE 119775 495 - 205065-8 1551.6530 REPAIR PARTS CITY HALL GENERAL 18.91- RETURN 119776 495 - 196283 -8 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 80.51 CAP SCREWS 119777 495 - 196282 -0 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 747.06 276184 918/2005 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 912.50 119592 75107 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 287.75 119821 75228 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,200.25 276185 918/2005 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE 33.40 MOPHEADS, GLASS CLEANER 119486 083005 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 83.04 BACKUP BATTERIES 119486 083005 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 116.44 276186 9/812005 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 62.48 RECEPTACLES 119535 911324471 5912.6406 - GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDINGS 48.94 RECEPTACLES, PLUGS 119536 911287269 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDINGS 186.35 RECEPTACLES, PLUGS 119537 911533242 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDINGS 175.68 - CREDIT 119888 910883774 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 122.09 276187 91812005 102125 GREG LESSMAN SALES 435.49 GOLF TEES 119722 31179 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 312.64 GOLF BALLS 119723 31206 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 748.13 276188 9/8/2005 118501 GREMMER & ASSOCIATES INC. 1,475.00 ENGINEERING FEES 119487 2 5600.1740 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT EB /CL BALANCE SHEET 1,475.00 276189 918/2005 100785 GREUPNER, JOE 3,637.50 CREDIT CARD LESSONS 119724 100785 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 3,637.50 276190 9/812005 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 1.791.76 119593 284036 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 259,19 119594 284039 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 34.10 119595 283578 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 6.021.35 119596 284040 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 344,96 119597 280446 - 862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 91712005 15:35:09 Council Check Register Page - 11 9/8/2005 - 9/8/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 30.60 119598 280445 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 68.09- 119599 673609 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 10,877.31 119822 284037 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING .85 119823 283528 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 82.70 119824 284035 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3.80- 119825 673847 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 23,368.93 276191 91812005 100787 GRUBER'S POWER EQUIPMENT 92.76 TRIMMER HEADS, SPRINGS 119669 25063 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS MOWING - 92.76 276192 918/2005 106431 HALL, MARY 150.00 PERFORMANCE 9113/2005 119670 082405 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 276193 9/812005 102060 HALLOCK COMPANY INC 51.47 LOCK 119538 6058 -1 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 51.47 _ 276194 9/8/2005 103359 HANSON PIPE & PRODUCTS INC. 320.57 CATCH BASIN 119539 477005384308 5932.6536 CASTINGS GENERAL STORM SEWER 320.57 276195 9/8/2005 102312 HARMON INC. - 483.75 DISPLAY CASE GLASS REPAIR 119451 285022087 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 483.75 276196 9/8/2005 117161 HENNEPIN CHIEF'S ASSOCIATION 40.00 LEGAL UPDATE 119778 6087 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 40.00 LEGAL UPDATE 119779 6088 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 40.00 LEGAL UPDATE 119780 6089, 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 40.00 LEGAL UPDATE 119781 6034 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 40.00 LEGAL UPDATE 119782 6035 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 40.00 LEGAL UPDATE 119783 6036 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 40.00 LEGAL UPDATE 119784 6064 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 40.00 LEGAL UPDATE 119785 6061 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 40.00 LEGAL UPDATE 119786 6062 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 40.00 LEGAL UPDATE 119787 6063 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 40.00 LEGAL UPDATE 119788 6065 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 440.00 9/7/2005 15:35:09 Page - 12 Business Unit LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES PARK MEMORIALS 125 00 PERFORMANCE 9115/2005 119671 082405 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 125.00 CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 276201 9/8/2005 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURI Council Check Register FIELD MARKING PAINT 119672 68875 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER 9/8/2005 --9/8/2005 463.28 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 276197 91812005 101215 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFF[ 326.84 1,394.21 JULY 2005 BOOKING FEE 119452 _ 711 1195.6170 COURT CHARGES 1,394.21 276198 9/812005 9/8 /2005 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 100810 HRAICITY OF EDINA 3,015.50 JULY 2005 119453 001090 1195.6225 BOARD & ROOM PRISONER 083105 1000.1303 3,015.50 5,000.00 276199 91812005 114507 HERMAN'S LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES 276204 9/812005 101426 HUGHES, GORDON 119.28 PAVERS FOR KIOSK 119878 016480 4704.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 317.12 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 119.28 090105 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE - 276200 91812005 101271 HINDING, CHRIS 9/7/2005 15:35:09 Page - 12 Business Unit LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES PARK MEMORIALS 125 00 PERFORMANCE 9115/2005 119671 082405 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION FIELD MAINTENANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET ADMINISTRATION INSPECTIONS COMMUNICATIONS PARK MEMORIALS 125.00 276201 9/8/2005 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURI 463.28 FIELD MARKING PAINT 119672 68875 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER 463.28 276202 918/2005 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS 326.84 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 119673 083105 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 326.84 276203 9/8 /2005 100810 HRAICITY OF EDINA 5,000.00 TO FUND HRA 119540 083105 1000.1303 DUE FROM HRA 5,000.00 276204 9/812005 101426 HUGHES, GORDON 317.12 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 119725 090105 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 317.12 276205 9/812005 100698 IMAGETECH SERVICES 105.56 .00E PAPER 119488 0000065290 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 105.56 276206 918/2005 116191 INSTY- PRINTS 58.81 POSTER PRINTING 119879 70677 2210.6575 PRINTING 58.81 276207 918/2005 118706 J &J GLASS AND GLAZING INC. 1,125.00 CASE FOR KIOSK 119880 4777 4704.6406. GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET ADMINISTRATION INSPECTIONS COMMUNICATIONS PARK MEMORIALS R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 276209 91812005 276210 9/8/2005 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/8/2005 -- 9/812005 9/7/2005 15:35:09 Page - 13 Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,125.00 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 373.90 119600 1948660 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5,875.60 119601 1948664 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 301.80 119602 1948652 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 60.40 119603 1948663 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 754.08 119604 1948661 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 154.70- 119605 289029 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 193.50- 119606 289483 - 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 12,537.60 119826 1945224 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,146.90 119827 1952060 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 72.00 119828 1952058 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 30.94 119829 1952057 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1.43 119830 1952051 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 6,517.20 119831 1952056 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,248.96 119832 1952055 5842.5512 _COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 235.95 119833 1952059 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 10,135.60 119834 1945231 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING' - 1,909.06 119835 1952713 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5,121.82 119836 1952065 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,110.28 119837 1952064 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING .47 119838 1948653 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2.85 119839 1941853 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING .48 119840 1952052 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 9,621.88 119841 1945230 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,717.41 119842 1948662 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 106.95 119843 1952046 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 434.77 119844 1952048 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 623.52 119845 1952049 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 142.51 119846 1952047 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 465.52 119847 1952050 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 62.94- 119848 289219 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 274.82- 119849 288270 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 62.47- 119850 289028 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 59,801.45 102719 JOHNSON, PHILLIP 106.49 SOFTWARE 119674 082305 5125.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT MEDIA STUDIO 106.49 276211 9/812005 101846 JUST FRIENDS BIG BAND R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/812005 --9/8/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 100.00 PERFORMANCE 9/11/2005 119675 082405 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 100.00 276212 9/812005 100839 KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES 432.82 BEARINGS, BELTS 119541 P282057 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 432.82 276213 9/812005 111018 KEEPRS INC. 189.88 UNIFORMS 119454 40673 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 189.88 276214 9/8/2005 105887 KOESSLER, JOE 146.00 AUG FEE 119676 083105 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 146.00 276215 9/8/2005 102474 KRULL, JULIE 61.46 UNIFORM PURCHASE 119789 090105 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 61.46 276216 9/8/2005 100846 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO 57.00 119607 445511 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 2,725.40 119608 445510 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEEF 35.00 119851 446044 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 1,565.50 119852 446045 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEEF 4,382.90 276217 9/8/2005 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS 110.53 DWI TOW 119726 090105 4601.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 110.53 276218 9/812005 100354 LAGUNA CLAY CO. 681.26 CLAY 119542 77104 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 681.26 276219 91812005 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 74.12 STRIPE PAINT 119543 3567788 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 63.15 LINKAGE CLIP 119544. 3567786 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 74.12 STRIPE PAINT 119677 3567787 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES 145.53 SCREWS, HOLESAW 119678 3572910 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 227.09 BITS, TY -RAP 119790 3572911 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 584.01 . 9/7/2005 15:35:09 Page - 14 Business Unit ED ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SENIOR CITIZENS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING POLICE FORFEITURE ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP STREET RENOVATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TREES 8 MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COLLECTION SYSTEMS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/7/2005 15:35:09 Council Check Register Page - 15 9/8/2005 -9/8/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 276220 9/8/2005 101887 LEAGUE OF MINN HUMAN RIGHTS CO 50.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 119679_ 083105 1504.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION 50.00 276221 918/2005 117720 LIFE FITNESS 72.41 WEIGHT SELECTOR PINS 119680 F082300589 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK _ 72.41 276222 9/812005 102204 LOBBY, MACKENZIE 8.04 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 119682 083105 5320.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL CONCESSIONS 38.24 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 119682 083105 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 49.82 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 119682 083105 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 51.08 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 119682 083105 5310.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POOL ADMINISTRATION 147.18 276223 9/8/2005 106301 LOFFLER COMPANIES INC. 56.00 COPIER USAGE 119455 125404 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 56.00 276224 918/2005 100858 LOGIS 31.00 119545 26153 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,178.00 119545 26153 2210.6160 DATA PROCESSING COMMUNICATIONS 2,242.00 119545 26153 1120.6160 DATA PROCESSING ADMINISTRATION 2,355.00 119545 26153 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING INSPECTIONS 2,484.00 119545 26153 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 3,956.00 119545 26153 5910.6160 DATA PROCESSING GENERAL (BILLING) 4,644.00 119545 26153 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 5,482.00 119545 26153 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 22,372.00 276225 9/812005 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1,942.74 119609 185629 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 826.53 119610 185920 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 156.42- RETURN 119611 186236 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 2,612.85 276226 9/8/2005 100864 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. 376.74 THROTTLE ACTUATOR 119489 2054803 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 357.63 OIL FILTERS 119681 2055591 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 734.37 276227 918/2005 118693 MACK, JEREMIAH R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/8/2005 -9/812005 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 206 00 ADMISSIONS REFUND 119683 090105 5601.4541 GENERAL ADMISSIONS 917/2005 15:35:09 Page - 16 Business Unit EB/CL REVENUES 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 206.00 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 276228 9 1812005 50TH ST SELLING 100868 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 94.80 5862.5514 119612 838911 5822.5514 - COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 4,080.75 5822.5514 119613 838910 3,041.02 119614 838359 87.25 119853 839433 1,961.00 119854 839432 3,433.70 119855 838610 93.25 119856 841180 1,642.70 119857 841179 14,434.47 276229 91812005 100869 MARTIN- MCALLISTER 350.00 PERSONNEL EVALUATION 119791 4459 350.00 276230 9/812005 101030 MATHISON CO. - 131.55 CANVAS, PALETTES 119546 610705-0 63.11 BRUSHES, PAPER 119547 611898 -0 121.59 BRUSHES 119548 607552 -1 316.25 276231 9/812005 101308 MCCARTHY, LOWELL 130.00 CAMERON BOOTH PROGRAM 119684 083005 130.00 276232 9/8/2005 111825 MCGUIRE MECHANICAL SERVICES IN 189.98 STORM DRAIN REPAIR 119549 2635 189.98 276233 9/8/2005 118692 MCLAUGHLIN, INGRIDA 28.00 PARKING PERMIT REFUND 119685 083105 28.00 276234 9/8/2005 100515 MCM ELECTRONICS 167.34 MONITOR, RECORDER 119550 538275 167.34 276235 9/8/2005 103189 MEDICA 917/2005 15:35:09 Page - 16 Business Unit EB/CL REVENUES 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5822.5514 - COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1628.6103 1551.6180 4090.4751 5125.6710 341,31 119490 105244122552 'c50.6040 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTED REPAIRS PARKING PERMITS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT HOSPITALIZATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP SENIOR CITIZENS CITY HALL GENERAL STREET REVOLVING MEDIA STUDIO CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 917/2005 15:35:09 Council Check Register Page- 17 9/8/2005 - 9/812005 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,341.31 276236 918/2005 103189 MEDICA 638.21 119491 105244125472 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 53,168.45 119491 105244125472 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 53,806.66 276237 918/2005 103189 MEDICA 13,726.60 119492 105244102386 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE_ CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 67,880.27 119492 105244102386 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 81,606.87 276238 9/8/2005 103189 MEDICA 902.67 119493 105244134271 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 5,069.08 119493 105244134271 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 5,971.75 276239 91812005 113023 MEGGITT DEFENSE SYSTEMS CASWEL 159.06 RANGE REPAIR PARTS 119686 061032 7411.6530 REPAIR PARTS PSTF OCCUPANCY 159.06 276240 9/8/2005 101483 MENARDS 76.81 KNIVES, SQUARES 119551 55502 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 184.67 CONCRETE MIX 119687 55087 1646.6517 SAND GRAVEL 8 ROCK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 140.74 ROLLERS, PRIMER, PLYWOOD 119792 54716 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 402.22 276241 9/812005 101987 MENARDS 319.18 PUMP, HOSE, GLOVES 119794 9689 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 115.53 MISC SUPPLIES 119795 20112 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 434.71 276242 9/8/2005 102281 MENARDS 42.58 JUMP STARTER 119688 18287 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 42.58 276243 918/2005 100882 MERIT SUPPLY 496.72 CLEANING SUPPLIES 119456 67637 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 304.48 HAND CLEANER, ROLL TOWEL 119552 67636 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 268.91 GRILL CLEANER, WINDEX 119728 67662 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GRILL 1,070.11 9/7/2005 15:35:09 Page - 18 Business Unit FIELD MAINTENANCE CITY HALL GENERAL COMM DEV BLK GRANT GENERAL MAINTENANCE STREET RENOVATION GENERAL MAINTENANCE STREET RENOVATION ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP GRILL EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION STREET REVOLVING PLAYGROUND & THEATER POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 9/8/2005 -9/8/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 276244 91812005 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 42.55 FIELD MARKING PAINT 119689- 85487 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER 42.55 276245 9/8/2005 115377 METRO FURNITURE SOLUTIONS 58.58 ADJUST & LEVEL FILES 119690 334114 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 58.58 276246 91812005 103192 METRO LEGAL SERVICES 19.00 TITLE/TAX SEARCH 119729 955525 2127.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 19.00 276247 91812005 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 1,069.22 ASPHALT 119494 75623MB 1301.6518 BLACKTOP 23,420.14 ASPHALT 119494 75623MB 1314.6518 BLACKTOP 214.64 ASPHALT 119554 75855MB 1301.6518 BLACKTOP 15,607.78 ASPHALT 119554 75855MB 1314.6518 BLACKTOP 40,311.78 276248 91812005 100892 MIDWEST BADGE & NOVELTY CO. IN 55.56 ROSETTES, RIBBONS 119553 109407 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 55.56 276249 91812005 101890 MIDWEST VENDING INC 178.56 CANDY 119727 3792 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 178.56 276250 91812005 102442 MIKE'S PRO SHOP 436.56 SOFTBALL TROPHIES 119555 52114 4077.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 436.56 276251 91812005 118705 MILLER, NANCY 28.00 PARKING PERMIT REFUND 119881 090205 4090.4751 PARKING PERMITS 28.00 276252 9/8/2005 102873 MILLER, SUSAN 204.00 TWINS TICKETS 119495 083005 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 204.00 276253 91812005 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 133.00. IMPOUND LOT CHARGE 119458 68980000088 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 133.00 9/7/2005 15:35:09 Page - 18 Business Unit FIELD MAINTENANCE CITY HALL GENERAL COMM DEV BLK GRANT GENERAL MAINTENANCE STREET RENOVATION GENERAL MAINTENANCE STREET RENOVATION ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP GRILL EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION STREET REVOLVING PLAYGROUND & THEATER POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 276254 9/812005 276255 91812005 276256 918/2005 276257 91812005 276258 91812005 276259 918/2005 276260 9/8/2005 276261 9/8/2005 276262 91812005 276263 91812005 917/2005 15:35:09 Page- 19 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 225 00 WORKSHOP REGISTRATION 119499 3072297 1260.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ENGINEERING GENERAL 225.00 111224 NACA 35.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 119796 090105 1450.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 35.00 100921 NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE 682.56 OLYMPUS C7070 CAMERA 119503 0830507GDNW 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ANIMAL CONTROL ASSESSING CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/812005 -9/8/2005 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 100913 MINNEAPOLIS SUBURBAN SEWER &W 720.00 CURB BOX REPAIR 119457 32730 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 720.00 102770 MINNESOTA CASTERS INC. 116.89 SWIVEL CASTERS 119496 INV25758 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 116.89 . 101591 MINNESOTA CERAMIC SUPPLY 85.66 NONTOXIC SOLUTION 119691 8989 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 85.66 102014 MINNESOTA CLAY USA 147.07 WHITE OXIDE, UNDERGLAZE 119556 38354 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 209.26 CLAY 119557 38371 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 356.33 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. 191.70 CSS-1 H ASPHALT EMULSION 119497 48767 1301.6519 ROAD OIL 63.90 ASPHALT EMULSION 119558 48883 1301.6519 ROAD OIL 255.60 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER 449.80 TOOL BRACKETS 119498 0065957 -IN 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 584.91 REPAIR WATER TRUCK 119559 0065960 -IN 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,034.71 118690 MINUTEMAN PRESS 678.28 RECEIPTS 119692 34262 5110.6575 PRINTING 678.28 114506 MN GIS/LIS CONFERENCE 917/2005 15:35:09 Page- 19 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 225 00 WORKSHOP REGISTRATION 119499 3072297 1260.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ENGINEERING GENERAL 225.00 111224 NACA 35.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 119796 090105 1450.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 35.00 100921 NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE 682.56 OLYMPUS C7070 CAMERA 119503 0830507GDNW 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ANIMAL CONTROL ASSESSING 35.10 SALES TAX 119697 MN077 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 35.10 276272 91812005 100939 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC. 100.24 COOKIES 119730 19342753 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 100.24 917/2005 15:35:09 Page - 20 Business Unit COLLECTION SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING- EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COMMUNICATIONS ED ADMINISTRATION ED ADMINISTRATION CITY HALL GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GRILL 566.29 CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 276267 9/8/2005 102652 NORTHLAND CHEMICAL CORP. Council Check Register DISSOLVE CLEANER 119500 92772 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 9/8/2005 —9/8/2005 206.78 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 100930 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO. 682.56 276264 9/8/2005 TIRE 100012 NATIONAL WATERWORKS INC. NW -97499 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES 169.34 PLASTIC PIPE 119797 2697250 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TIRES & TUBES 169.34 1,123.34 TIRES, SERVICE, SCRAP FEES 119561 NW -97440 276265 91812005 118686 NELSON, MARK 1,378.56 81.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 119560 083005 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 81.00 63.86 276266 9/812005 082405 104672 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES 202,34 56629 082405 119798 909583317 -045 1400.6188 TELEPHONE 35.10 SALES TAX 119697 MN077 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 35.10 276272 91812005 100939 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC. 100.24 COOKIES 119730 19342753 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 100.24 917/2005 15:35:09 Page - 20 Business Unit COLLECTION SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING- EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COMMUNICATIONS ED ADMINISTRATION ED ADMINISTRATION CITY HALL GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GRILL 566.29 276267 9/8/2005 102652 NORTHLAND CHEMICAL CORP. 206.78 DISSOLVE CLEANER 119500 92772 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 206.78 276268 918/2005 100930 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO. 115.77 TIRE 119501 NW -97499 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES 139.45 TIRE DISPOSAL, REPAIR 119502 NW -97461 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES 1,123.34 TIRES, SERVICE, SCRAP FEES 119561 NW -97440 1553.6583 TIRES &TUBES 1,378.56 276269 91812005 101592 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN 63.86 119799 082405 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 202,34 119799 082405 5610.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 373.40 119799 082405 5610.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 639.60 276270 91812005 101659 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 1,105.46 D- 2809201 119693 PEST CONTROL 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,105.46 276271 9/812005 103123 ORTIVUS INC. 35.10 SALES TAX 119697 MN077 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 35.10 276272 91812005 100939 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC. 100.24 COOKIES 119730 19342753 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 100.24 917/2005 15:35:09 Page - 20 Business Unit COLLECTION SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING- EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COMMUNICATIONS ED ADMINISTRATION ED ADMINISTRATION CITY HALL GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 276273 9/8/2005 2233655 101718 PARTS PLUS VERNON SELLING 119620 2,179.18 PARTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 119621 2,179.18 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 276274 9/8/2005 3323551 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS VERNON SELLING 119623 2,260.20 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 119858 23.74 - 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 119859 165.00- 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 119860 2,071.46 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 276275 9/8/2005 2236089 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 50TH ST SELLING 119862 1,016.10 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 1,016.10 119625 276276 9/8/2005 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 119626 938.20 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 10.44- 4,988.10 119627 672891 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 415.05 1,486.23 119863 283579 391.05 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 18.00 - 40.90- 953.13 184.68 2,844.77 esa ns CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/812005 -9/812005 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 119459_ 082605 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 9/7/2005 15:35:09 Page- 21 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 119615 8080329 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 119616 8079781 -CM 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 119617 8079310 -CM 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 119731 76348744 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 119618 2233653 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 119619 2233655 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 119620 2233226 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 119621 2233654 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 119622 3323551 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 119623 3323539 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 119858 2236093 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 119859 2236096 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 119860 2236087 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 119861 2236089 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 119862 3323266 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 276277 9/8/2005 100961 POSTMASTER 5,000.00 PERMIT #939 119732 090205 5910.6235 POSTAGE GENERAL (BILLING) 5,000.00 276278 9/812005 116396 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 15.80 CO2 119694 419336 7413.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF FIRE TOWER 15.80 276279 9/8/2005 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 2,224.40 119624 283573 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 630.34 119625 283576 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 72.35 119626 283580 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 10.44- 119627 672891 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,486.23 119863 283579 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 4,402.88 276280 918/2005 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 169.06 ROLL TOWEL, TISSUE 334.19 ROLL TOWEL, SOAP 503.25 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 918/2005 - 9/812005 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 119695 3621 119696 3615 276281 918/2005 101877 PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY 8.70 COBRA 119698 090105 8.70 276282 9/812005 276283 91812005 102964 QUALIFICATION TARGETS INC. 74.94 TRAINING TARGETS 74.94 100971 QUALITY WINE 17.44- 1,769.23 8.68- 881.93 10.94- 1,110.47 11.21- 1,133.12 15.56- 784.13 4.28- 435.76 10.94- 1,112.74 90.11- 4,538.24 18.00 - 72A7- 51.23- 2,578.41 20.00- 14,013.17 119460 20501890 119628 597540 -00 119628 597540 -00 -119629 597738 -00 119629 597738 -00 119630 597541 -00 119630 597541 -00 119631 596732 -00 119631 596732 -00 119632 597674 -00 119632 597674 -00 119633 597539 -00 119633 597539 -00 119634 597737 -00 119634 597737 -00 119635 597688.00 119635 597688 -00 119636 589160 -00 119637 593821 -00 119864 597673-00 119864 597673-00 119865 597144 -00 276284 9/8/2005 101965 QWEST 54.78 952 929 -0297 119562 0297 -8105 96.20 952 927 -8861 119563 8861 -8105 5620.6511 5620.6511 Subledger Account Description CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 5860.5518 5862.5513 5860.5518 5862.5513 5820.5518 5822.5513 5820.5518 5822.5513 5820.5518 5822.5513 5840.5518 5842.5513 5840.5518 5842.5513 5840.5518 5842.5512 5842.5513 5842.5513 5860.5518 5862.5512 5822.5513 4090.6188 '550.6188 VENDOR DISCOUNTS -COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 9/7/2005 15:35:09 Page - 22 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL VERNON SELLING VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL VERNON SELLING 50TH STREET GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING 50TH STREET GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING 50TH STREET GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL YORK SELLING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL YORK SELLING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING STREET REVOLVING CENTRAL SERVICES r" -'ORAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 918/2005 -9/8/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv-No. Account No Subledger Account Description 86.51 952 929 -9549 119733 9549 -8/05 5841.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL SUPPLIES 9/7/2005 15:35:09 Page - 23 Business Unit YORK OCCUPANCY CENTENNIAL LAKES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 237.49 POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK MEMORIALS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 276285 918/2005 104643 RECREATION SUPPLY COMPANY 108.09 LEAF RAKES 119699 114862 5630.6406 108.09 276286 9/8/2005 114489 RICOH CORPORATION 27.01 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 119700 F082300178 -21 7411.6103 27.01 276287 9/8/2005 101979 ROFIDAL, KEVIN 75.79 TRAINING EXPENSES 119461 082605 1400.6104 75.79 276288 91812005 103062 RUNYAN, DAVID T. 600.00 KIOSK DESIGN 119882 083105 4704.6103 600.00 276289 918/2005 118702 SAARELA, CALEB M - 238.50 PROGRAM STAFF 119800 090205 1629.6103 238.50 276290 9/8/2005 101634 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPANY 69.81 BAKERY 119734 133363 5421.5510 69.81 276291 9/812005 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 86.27 STAKES 119504 40154144 1301.6406 64.54 CONCRETE FORMS 119701 40156655 1648.6406 29.48 PLYWOOD 119702 40155835 1646.6577 180.29 276292 9/8/2005 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. 519.81 QUARTERLY BILLING 119883 8101343207 1628.6103 519.81 276293 918/2005 100994 SEELYE PLASTICS 32.24 PVC UNIONS 119505 715785 5923.6406 32.24 276294 91812005 117390 SIEGEL DISPLAY PRODUCTS INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 9/7/2005 15:35:09 Page - 23 Business Unit YORK OCCUPANCY CENTENNIAL LAKES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK MEMORIALS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL- GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/8/2005 - 9/8/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 309.33 DISPLAY STAND 119735 500013997 1240.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES AMMUNITION CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR GASOLINE GENERAL SUPPLIES DATA PROCESSING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES UNIFORM ALLOWANCE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 9/7/2005 15:35:09 Page - 24 Business Unit PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SCHAEFER RD WESTWOOD - INTERLA YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN STREET RENOVATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PARK MEMORIALS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 309.33 276295 91812005 105286 SMITH & WESSON 50.64 AMMO 119801 0651287 1400.6551 50.64 276296 9/8/2005 118684 SMITH, KEVIN 90.34 SPRINKLER REPAIR 119506 083005 01216.1705.30 90.34 276297 9/8/2005 101002 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS INC 7,293.95 119638 169930 5842.5514 88.55 119639 169931 5842.5515 35.95 119640 169927 5822.5515 1,350.95 119641 169926 5822.5514 8,769.40 276298 918/2005 116682 SPECIALTY WINES & BEVERAGES 146.00 119866 4222 5862.5512 146.00 276299 9/8/2005 101021 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC 14.36 GAS 119802 082305 1553.6581 140.50 PROPANE 119802 082305 1314.6406 154.86 276300 918/2005 116856 SPRINT 1,091.76 MOBILE CDMA 119462 081605 1400.6160 1,091.76 276301 91812005 118682 SPRINT 65.00 119463 2108502892 1400.6103 65.00 276302 91812005 103283 ST. CROIX RECREATION CO INC 2,172.60 DRINKING FOUNTAIN 119564 14446 4704.6406 2,172.60 276303 91812005 101015 STREICHERS 63.85 UNIFORMS 119464 1288975 1400.6203 878.00 VEST 119465 1283339 1400.6203 AMMUNITION CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR GASOLINE GENERAL SUPPLIES DATA PROCESSING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES UNIFORM ALLOWANCE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 9/7/2005 15:35:09 Page - 24 Business Unit PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SCHAEFER RD WESTWOOD - INTERLA YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN STREET RENOVATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PARK MEMORIALS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/7/2005 15:35:09 Council Check Register Page - 25 9/8/2005 -9/8/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 941.85 276304 91812005 117992 STRINGER BUSINESS SYSTEMS 18.72 COPIER MAINTENANCE 119466 1125060 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 18.72 276305 918/2005 117706 STS CONSULTANTS LTD 2,332.10 SOIL TESTING 119467 274016 01204.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BROOKVIEW - 52 TO 54 RECLAIM 2,332.10 276306 9/812005 102140 SUN MOUNTAIN SPORTS INC. 121.55 SPEED CART 119736 592353 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 17.00 UMBRELLA HOLDER KITS 119737 592342 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 138.55 276307 9/8/2005 102624 SUNDANCE DISTRIBUTION INC. 660.48 MULCH 119803 SI.131916 5630.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES 660.48 276308 918/2005 111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC. 35.00 BEERLINE CLEANING 119738 357774 5421.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GRILL 35.00 276309 91812005 101326 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO 117.17 RELAYS 119565 54390 -00 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 117.17 276310 9/812005 101028 TERRY ANN SALES CO 567.11 CUPS AND DISPENSERS 119739 2449 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 567.11 276311 9/8/2005 101034 THOMSEN & NYBECK 33.00 PROSECUTING - ATK 119507 14265 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES 22,698.30 PROSECUTING 119508 14266 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES 22.731.30 276312 9/812005 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 384.75 119740 384650 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 516.00 119741 19089 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 82.50 119867 384795 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 8,627.40 119868 384794 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 9,610.65 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/8/2005 —9/8/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 276313 91812005 114701 TIME WARNER CABLE 199.90 0415703 -01 CABLE 119742 082405 5430.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 199.90 276314 9/8/2005 101474 TITLEIST 917/2005 15:35:09 Page - 26 Business Unit RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 160.10 GOLF BALLS 119743 2597776 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 2,262.26 GOLF BALLS 119744 2591974 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 2,422.36 276315 9/812005 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 58.79 WELDING GAS 119703 372454 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 58.79 276316 9/8/2005 118704 TOWNSHEND, SCHUYLER 20.25 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 119884 090205 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 20.25 276317 91812005 103982 TRAFFIC CONTROL CORPORATION 2,321.18 TRAFFIC LIGHTING 119566 17287 1330.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE TRAFFIC 51GNALS- 2,193.90 TRAFFIC LIGHTING 119567 17350 1330.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS GENERAL TURF CARE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL TURF CARE 1,000.00 ESCROW FEE 119568 1559257 4400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CITY HALL/POLICE BUILDING 1,000.00 276322 91812005 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 258.40 BAGS 119468 596904 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 811.38 BAGS, UTENSILS, LINERS 119469 596903 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 4,515.08 276318 918/2005 100682 TRUGREEN- CHEMLAWN 106.50 WEED CONTROL 119704 305907 1643.6546 WEED SPRAY 106.50 276319 918/2005 101172 TWIN CITY SAW CO. 75.56 CARBURETOR 119804 A11793 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 75.56 276320 91812005 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 114.49 FERTILIZER 119705 12938 1643.6540 FERTILIZER 114.49 276321 918 /2005 103048 U.S. BANK GENERAL TURF CARE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL TURF CARE 1,000.00 ESCROW FEE 119568 1559257 4400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CITY HALL/POLICE BUILDING 1,000.00 276322 91812005 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 258.40 BAGS 119468 596904 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 811.38 BAGS, UTENSILS, LINERS 119469 596903 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 50TH ST SELLING 2,400.84 CITY OF EDINA ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 276323 Council Check Register 118701 VEENENDAAL, JEANNE 9/8/2005 - 9/8/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 396.39 BAGS 119470 596905 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 192.77 PLATES, BOWLS, FORKS 119509 596661 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 43.13 ROLL TOWEL 119569 595103 5111.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 53.38 ADJUSTMENT BILLING 119706 596605 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES . 104.90 SOAP 119745 597354 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 540.49 LINERS, TOWELS, TISSUE 119746 596967 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES AMBULANCE FEES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 9!7/2005 15:35:09 Page - 27 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING CENT SVC PW BUILDING ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL GRILL GRILL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL RENOVATE BRAEMAR PARK FIELD ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 2,400.84 YORK SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 276323 91812005 118701 VEENENDAAL, JEANNE 109.93 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 119805 090205 1470.4329 109.93 276324 9/8/2005 102734 VEIT & COMPANY INC 257,464.25 ATHLETIC FIELD RENOVATION 119510 050389 -01 47036.6710 257,464.25 276325 9/812005 101610 VERIZON DIRECTORIES CORP. 28.00 DIRECTORY LISTING 119511 390010124867 5822.6122 28.00 DIRECTORY LISTING 119511 390010124867 5842.6122 28.00 DIRECTORY LISTING 119511 390010124867 5862.6122 84.00 276326 91812005 101061 VICTORY CORPS 1,174.30 FLAG POLE INSTALLATION 119707 016264 7411.6103 1,174.30 276327 9/8/2005 102218 VINTAGE ONE WINES 235.45 119642 9774 5862.5513 235.45 276328 91812005 101076 WEST PHOTO 97.37 PHOTO EQUIPMENT 119570 26234 5125.6710 97.37 276329 9/8/2005 117097 WILKIE, WILLIAM 15.00 REFRIGERANT CLASS 119512 083005 1281.6104 15.00 276330 9/812005 101973 WILMOT, SOLVEI 159.27 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 119747 003956 5952.6104 159.27 AMBULANCE FEES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 9!7/2005 15:35:09 Page - 27 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING CENT SVC PW BUILDING ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL GRILL GRILL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL RENOVATE BRAEMAR PARK FIELD ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT MEDIA STUDIO CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS RECYCLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 917/2005 15:35:09 Council Check Register Page - 28 9/8/2005 - 9/8/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 276331 9/812005 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 408.80 119643 122861 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 426.90 119644 122836 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 71.50 119645 122374 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 34.00- 119646 122636 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 248.80 119869 122837 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,122.00 276332 9/812005 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 3,591.90 119647 133033 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 678.65 119648 133137 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 84.95- 119649 25589 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 727.60- 119650 25590 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 372.35 119870 133682 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,830.35 276333 918 /2005 102492 WIRTGEN AMERICA 96.55 RELAY ELEMENT 119513 158050 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 96.55 276334 918/2005 101726 XCEL ENERGY 8,097.67 51- 6121102 -5 119472 38574831 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 4,920.16 514827232 -6 119473 39142857 5311.6185 LIGHT & POWER POOL OPERATION 667.31 51- 6137136 -8 119474 39158067 5430.6185 LIGHT & POWER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 22,500.75 51- 6955679 -8 (2 MONTHS) 119475 39180801 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENERAL 158.35 51- 4156445-0 119571 39256463 5932.6185 LIGHT & POWER GENERAL STORM SEWER 8.55 51 -0541084 -2 119572 39318435 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 126.65 515634814 -2 119573 39301618 5933.6185 LIGHT & POWER PONDS & LAKES 786.10 51- 6046826 -0 119574 39304395 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,659.28 51 -4159265 -8 119708 38812910 7411.6185 LIGHT & POWER PSTF OCCUPANCY 192.90 51- 5605640 -1 119749 39478072 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 52.76 51- 6692497 -0 119806 38884235 1460.6185 LIGHT & POWER CIVILIAN DEFENSE 27,711.17 51- 4621797 -2 119885 38812380 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 30.56 51- 6892224 -5 119886 38872538 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 4,754.03 51 -4966303 -6 119887 39457502 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 71,666.24 276335 91812005 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 192.60 FUSER 119471 192191378 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 192.60 276336 91812005 105343 YES DISTRIBUTING INC. R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 175.49 FILTERS 175.49 922,082.19 Grand Total Cf1Y OF EDINA Council Cheek Register 9/8/2005 — 9/812005 PO # Doc No Irry No Account No Subledger Account Description 119748 156792 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 922,082.19 Total Payments 922,082.19 Business Unit GRILL 9172005 15:35:09 Page - 29 R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 9/8/2005 - 9/8/2005 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 334,455.98 02100 CDBG FUND 19.00 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 20,024.81 03066 IBR #2 FUND 15,601.26 03100 GENERAL DEBT SERVICE FUND 14,000.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 276,327.30 04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND 44.80 05100 ART CENTER FUND 7,717.82 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 54.01 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 4,942.39 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 15,113.12 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 7,188.80 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 16,559.64 05800 LIQUOR FUND 187,253.91 05900 UTILITY FUND 18,804.43 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 605.57 05950 RECYCLING FUND 159.27 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 3,212.08 Report Totals 922,082.19 9/712005 15:54:50 Page - 1 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and ,I _OT-5- procedures Fine City Manager R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/14/2005 14:18:44 Council Check Register Page - 1 9/15/2005 — 9/15/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 276337 9/15/2005 102403 AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT 188.92 DIRT 119945 24410 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 188.92 276338 9/1512005 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 96.52 119990 466605 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 22.12 119991 466607 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 52.68 119992 468008 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 83.80 120260 467682 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 255.12 - 276339 9/15/2005 100615 ACME WINDOW CLEANING INC 1,054.35 RAMP CLEANING 119946 057142 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 1,054.35 276340 9115/2005 102626 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES 650.82 READY MIX 119947 4126079 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 564.24 READY MIX 119948 4125833 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 705.30 READY MIX 119949 4125600 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVAY40N 1,920.36 - 276341 9115/2005 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 199.50 COFFEE 120067 124029 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 199.50 276342 9/15/2005 111228 ALDEN POOL & MUNICIPAL SUPPLY 1,384.50 MOTOR 119950 500486 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 1,384.50 276343 911512005 105262 ALEX AIR APPARATUS INC. 135.73 CUTTER REPAIRS 120069 9586 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 135.73 276344 9115/2005 100058 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES 9894 33,874.00 RECYCLING 120068 0894000177580 5952.6183 RECYCLING CHARGES RECYCLING 33,874.00 276345 9/15/2005 101506 AMERICAN HOTEL REGISTER CO. 452.12 BENCH PEDESTALS 120147 4530704 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 452.12 276346 9/15/2005 101115 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK COST OF GOODS SOLD CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS REPAIR PARTS CHEMICALS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 9/14/2005 14:18:44 Page- 2 Business Unit - CITY HALL GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY - FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EB /CL REVENUES GRILL SCHAEFER RD WESTWOOD - INTERLA EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK CITY HALL GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 276347 9/1512005 Council Check Register 9/15/2005 - 9/15/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No- - ( Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 431.12 120221 46 -8/05 1551.6201 LAUNDRY 421.19 120222- 6200 -8/05 1470.6201 LAUNDRY 98.35 120223 35314 -8/05 5861.6201 LAUNDRY 94.91 120224 35320 -8105 5841.6201 LAUNDRY 41.31 120225 35334 -8 /05 5821.6201 LAUNDRY 60.34 120226 59056 -8/30 1470.6201 LAUNDRY CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK COST OF GOODS SOLD CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS REPAIR PARTS CHEMICALS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 9/14/2005 14:18:44 Page- 2 Business Unit - CITY HALL GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY - FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EB /CL REVENUES GRILL SCHAEFER RD WESTWOOD - INTERLA EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK CITY HALL GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,147.22 276347 9/1512005 102109 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER 12.00 PAGER REPAIR 120070 65378 1470.6180 12.00 276348 9/15/2005 118713 ANDERSON, RANDY 1,000.00 RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 120227 090905 5601.4554 1,000.00 276349 9/15/2005 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 591.55 FOOD 120071 441446 5421.5510 591.55 276350 9/1512005 103065 AQUA CITY IRRIGATION INC 283.45 SPRINKLER REPAIR 120148 16919 01216.1705.30 283.45 276351 911512005 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. 86.29 PULSAR PARTS 120149 27506 5620.6530 215.04 CAL HYPO 120150 27513 5620.6545 301.33 276352 9/15/2005 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 236.25 COFFEE 119890 6013 - 494122 1551.6406 236.25 276353 9/1512005 101977 ARCH WIRELESS 10.97 PAGER 120151 A60960831 1551.6406 10.97 276354 9/15/2005 102134 ASHWORTH INC. 50.16 MERCHANDISE 120072 604435 5440.5511. 50.16 279355 911 5/200! 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS - CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK COST OF GOODS SOLD CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS REPAIR PARTS CHEMICALS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 9/14/2005 14:18:44 Page- 2 Business Unit - CITY HALL GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY - FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EB /CL REVENUES GRILL SCHAEFER RD WESTWOOD - INTERLA EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK CITY HALL GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES R55CKREG LOG20000 119993 125.00 5822.5515 CITY OF EDINA 50TH ST SELLING 176.20 119994 276360 9/1512005 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR Council Check Register '108.20 119995 34456600 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 9/15/2005 - 9/15/2005 SIGNS Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No . Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 113.70 WASTE DISPOSAL/RECYCLING 119891 090105 7411.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 113.70 120262 34503600 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 276356 911512005 TECH KITS 101954 AUGIE'S INC. 18- 125352 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 56.75 FOOD 120073 25293 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 276362 56.75 102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC. 276357 9/1512005 100638 BACHMAN'S 411.44 BATTERIES 119893 25833 1553.6530 282.46 PLANTS 120074 082005 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 120075 25844 1,493.95 HEDGE, TREES 120074 082005 5422.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES 1,776.41 276363 9/1512005 276358 9/15/2005 115381 BAILEYS 67.50 CHLORINE, ALCOHOL WIPES 119892 05.15332 4204.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 67.50 276359 9/15/2005 103241 BALDINGER, WENDY 9/14/2005 14:18:44 Page- 3 Business Unit PSTF OCCUPANCY RICHARDS GOLF COURSE CITY HALL GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS HEALTH ALERT NETWORK 125.00 PERFORMANCE 9/29/05 120152 090105 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION STREET NAME SIGNS ENGINEERING GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 60.07 119993 125.00 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 176.20 119994 276360 9/1512005 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 100642 BANNERS TO GO '108.20 119995 34456600 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 42.60 SIGNS 119951 20168 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,561.50 119997 42.60 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 361.55 120261 276361 9115/2005 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 11852.50 120262 34503600 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 123.52 TECH KITS 120308 18- 125352 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 123.52 276362 9/15/2005 102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC. 411.44 BATTERIES 119893 25833 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 128.65 BATTERIES 120075 25844 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 540.09 276363 9/1512005 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION STREET NAME SIGNS ENGINEERING GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 60.07 119993 40474300 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 176.20 119994 34456700 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING '108.20 119995 34456600 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,087.70 119996 34443500 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,561.50 119997 34443600 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 361.55 120261 34484600 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 11852.50 120262 34503600 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 744.70 120263 34503500 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/14/2005 14:18:44 Council Check Register Page - 4 9/15/2005 — 9/15/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 7,952.42 276364 9/15/2005 103486 BEND IN THE RIVER BIG BAND 125.00 PERFORMANCE 9/29/05 120153 090105 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 276373 9/15/2005 100681 CATCO PSTF OCCUPANCY CENT SVC PW BUILDING RICHARDS GOLF COURSE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL MAINTENANCE EDINBOROUGH PARK STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL DISTRIBUTION GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 119998 41725 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 125.00 276365 9/1512005 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 506.63 LAWN SERVICE 120076 10039 7411.6136- SNOW & LAWN CARE 506.63 276366 9/1512005 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 19.59 MOUSE PAD 120154 OE- 5857 -1 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 19.59 276367 9115/2005 101676 BIFFS INC 66.41 RESTROOM RENTAL 120077 W266839 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 252.82 RESTROOM RENTAL 120078 W266838 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 319.23 276368 9/15/2005 118714 BLIZZARD, MANDY 58.56 CAR CLEANING REIMBURSEMENT 120228 090705 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 58.56 276369 911512005 103879 BLOOMINGTON RENTAL CENTER 17.58 2ND DAY RENTAL 119952 20233CLOSED 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 17.58 276370 9/15/2005 101010 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 756.45 LIGHTING 119953 94623178 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS 114.30 NIPPLES 120155 94625010 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 329.36 TOOLS. 120155 94625010 1301.6556 TOOLS 1,200.11 276371 9115/2005 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 84.84 FUEL SENDER 120156 784340 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 84.84 276372 9/15/2005 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 276373 9/15/2005 100681 CATCO PSTF OCCUPANCY CENT SVC PW BUILDING RICHARDS GOLF COURSE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL MAINTENANCE EDINBOROUGH PARK STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL DISTRIBUTION GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 119998 41725 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 100120394 382.81 119895 CITY OF EDINA 9/15/2005 119895 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 1554.6103 120160 Council Check Register XCEL ENERGY - LIFT STATION 378.70 9/15/2005 - 9/15/2005 9/15/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 163.84 SLACK ADJUSTERS 120157. 3 -83420 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 78.98 SEALS 120158- 3 -83453 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 242.82 199.04 COURIER 276374 9/15/2005 102372 COW GOVERNMENT INC. 9/1512005 100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP. 675.20 TONER CARTRIDGES 119894 7776240 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 167.46 675.20 276380 9/15/2005 103963 COLOR PRINTING INC. 276375 9/15/2005 101223 CITIES FORD INVITATIONS, ENVELOPES 230.04 382.81 SHAFTS, BEARINGS 120159 119024WFOW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 119954 2659 5932.6185 120229 100120394 382.81 119895 276376 9/15/2005 119895 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 1554.6103 120160 378.70 XCEL ENERGY - LIFT STATION 378.70 276377 9/15/2005 103040 CITY PAGES 506.00 FALL INTO THE ARTS AD 506.00 276378 9115/2005 105693 CITYSPRINT 35.62 COURIER 199.04 COURIER 234.66 276379 9/1512005 100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP. 167.46 SWITCHES, SCREW KIT 167.46 276380 9/15/2005 103963 COLOR PRINTING INC. 230.04 INVITATIONS, ENVELOPES 230.04 276381 9115/2005 101345 COLOURS 532.50 INVITATION DESIGN 532.50 276382 9115/2005 118719 CONNER, RUTH 532.00 GLASS ARTIST 532.00 276383 9/15/2005 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 119954 2659 5932.6185 120229 100120394 1500.6103 119895 11022 -1916 1260.6406 119895 11022 -1916 1554.6103 120160 46787 1553.6530 119955 051297 120079 9378 120230 090905 2210.6575 2210.6103 5110.6103 LIGHT & POWER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REPAIR PARTS PRINTING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 9/14/2005 14:18:44 Page- 5 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENT SERV GEN - MIS _ EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL STORM SEWER CONTINGENCIES ENGINEERING GENERAL CENT SERV GEN - MIS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 31.40 CITY OF EDINA 120080 132166 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS Council Check Register 31.40 9/1512005 — 9/15/2005 9/15/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 68.13 145.56 EMERGENCY PREP SUPPLIES 120161 02649536 4204.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 128.85 EARMUFFS, SAFETY GLASSES 120162 02652991 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 276389 274.41 118720 DAVIDSON, TAMELA 276384 9115/2005 101590 CORNERSTONE 62.00 CLASS REFUND 120231 090705 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION 15,100.00 2005 SERVICES 120163 255 1504.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 15,100.00 276390 9/15/2005 100712 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT 276385 9/1512005 100513 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES IN 187.82 METER COUPLINGS 119957 2,742.38 CUSTODIAL SERVICES 119896 0000099562 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 187.82 2,742.38 _ 276386 9/15/2005 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING 101418 CUMMINS NPOWER LLC 347.83 SOLENOID 119956 100 -63574 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS YORK SELLING 347.83 1,144.40 120265 329700 5842.5514 276387 9/15/2005 100701 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. 38.00 120266 329701 9/14/2005 14:18:44 Page - 6 Business Unit HEALTH ALERT NETWORK EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION CITY HALL GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 31.40 VALVE, CONNECTORS 120080 132166 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 31.40 276388 9/15/2005 104020 DALCO 68.13 CLEANING SUPPLIES 119897 1672200 5111.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 68.13 276389 9/15/2005 118720 DAVIDSON, TAMELA _ 62.00 CLASS REFUND 120231 090705 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 62.00 276390 9/15/2005 100712 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT 187.82 METER COUPLINGS 119957 3312790 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS METER REPAIR 187.82 276391 9/15/2005 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING 141.00 120264 329636 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,144.40 120265 329700 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 38.00 120266 329701 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,323.40 276392 9/1512005 118490 DEEP ROCK WATER COMPANY 77.54 6091800 -6 WATER 119898 083105 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 77.54 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/15/2005 - 9/15/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation Poi Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 276393 9115/2005 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 114.10 HAND TOOLS 120164 802537 1553.6556 TOOLS 114.10 276394 9/1512005 _ 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 9/14/2005 14:18:44 Page - 7 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 27.59 BAKERY 120081 198651 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 25.32 BAKERY 120082 199269 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 108.41 BAKERY 120083 199409 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 60.04 BAKERY 120084 199441 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 221.36 276395 9/15/2005 100571 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS 626.75 PAINT 120165 802074004 1335.6532 PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS 1,368.31 PAINT 120166 802074175 1335.6532 PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS 313.38 PAINT 120309 802074575 1335.6532 PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS 2,124.52 PAINT 120310 802074576 1335.6532 PAINT- PAVEMENT MARKINGS 4,432.96 276396 911512005 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES 908.92 CHLORINE, CAUSTIC SODA 119899 82701173 -05 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 504.18 CHLORINE, CAUSTIC SODA 119900 82701210 -05 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 1,000.17 CAUSTIC SODA, CHLORINE 120167 82701168 -05 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 2,073.85 CHEMICALS 120168 82701211 -05 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT_ 1,732.36 CHEMICALS 120169 .82701252 -05 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 235.33- CREDIT 120170 C82700047 -05 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 5,984.15 276397 9115/2005 101747 DRESSER TRAP ROCK INC. 752.38 FA -2 ROCK 119958 56743 1314.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK STREET RENOVATION 752.38 276398 9/15/2005 100735 E-Z SHARP INC 447.46 SHARPENER PARTS 119901 9354 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 447.46 276399 9115/2005 100739 EAGLE WINE 1,775.38 119999 283362 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 468.62 120000 286132 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 808.16 120001 286131 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 325.62 120267 286130 5822.5513 COST.OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,377.78 CITY OF EDINA 9/14/2005 14:18:44 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 8 9/15/2005 -9115/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No-- Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 276400 9/1512005 100741 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 96.00 120002 613766 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 10,644.65 120003 327314 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 114.00 120085 216721 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 210.00 - 120086 14988 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 4,631.15 120268 327390 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 15,695.80 276401 9/15/2005 100742 ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION DIVISI 149.10 PEST CONTROL 119902 4946689 5630.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES 149.10 276402 9/15/2005 118710 EDINA WEST 8,086.48 OVERPAYMENT REFUND 119959 090705 5900.1211.1 ACCTS RECEIVABLE MANUAL UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 8,086.48 276403 9115/2005 116448 EGAN OIL COMPANY 22,232.47 GAS 120171 110004 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 22,232.47 276404 9/1512005 100746 ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR 329.30 MOTOR REPAIRS 119903 331431 5630.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES 329.30 276405 9/1512005 102657 ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION & MAIN 135.00 REMOVE POLES 119960 0007236 -IN 1322.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 135.00 - 276406 9/15/2005 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC 72.99 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 120087 INV746993 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 219.75 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 120067 INV746993 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 292.74 276407 9/15/2005 100018 EXPERT T BILLING 5,688.00 AUGUST TRANSPORTS 119961 090605 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5,688.00 276408 9/15/2005 102003 FASTSIGNS BLOOMINGTON 57.77 SIGN LETTERS 119904 190 - 27671 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 660.30 SIGNAGE 120232 190 -27695 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 718.07 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/14/2005 14:18:44 Council Check Register Page - 9 9/15/2005 - 9/15/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 276409 9/1512005 118715 FESLER, R. V. 247.64 RECEPTION FOOD REIMBURSEMENT 120233 _ 090905 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 247.64 276410 9115/2005 100760 FOWLER ELECTRIC 6.39 REPAIR KIT 120172 61870100 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION_ GEN 6.39 276411 9115/2005 102432 FREEWAY RADIATOR SERVICE 168.27 RADIATOR 120173 36011 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 183.18 RADIATOR 120174 36010 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 351.45 276412 9115/2005 100764 G & K SERVICES 56.52 120311 083105 5511.6201 LAUNDRY ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 130.52 120311 083105 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 263.56 120311 083105 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 388.03 120311 083105 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 389.12 120311 083105 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 451.00 120311 083105 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,678.75 276413 9/15/2005 118712 GADBAR, TIM 150.00 PERFORMANCE 9/20/05 120175 090105 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 276414 9/15/2005 115314 GALAXY TECHNICAL SERVICES 5.72 BALANCE DUE 120088 1572SAL 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5.72 276415 9/1512005 102456 GALLS INC. 109.67 FLARES 120089 5785694100018 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 217.23 FLARES 120090 5785448100017 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 326.90 . 276416 9115/2005 100920 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY - MINNEA 1,016.56 ACCT 14309180 120312 083105 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS. EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,016.56 276417 9115/2005 103185 GERTENS 1,213.94 LANDSCAPE PLANTS 119905 8/31/05STMT 4400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CITY HALL/POLICE BUILDING 1,213.94 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/15/2005 -- 9/15/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 276418 911512005 103316 GOETSCH, SAM L. 450.00 INTERPRETER 120234 090805 4078.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 450.00 276419 911512005 101103 GRAINGER 9/14/2005 14:18:44 Page - 10 Business Unit INCLUSION PROGRAM 25.52 ROOF CAPS 119962 495. 564922 -5 5912.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDINGS 14.65 DRILL INDEX 119963 495-651283 -6 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 280.07 FIXTURES 120091 495 - 393380 -3 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 35.24 BATTERIES, BULBS 120176. 498- 986649 -8 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 153.90 CLEANING CHEMICALS 120177 498 - 577053 -8 5620.6511 _ CLEANING SUPPLIES - EDINBOROUGH PARK - 509.38 276420 9/15/2005 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 948.50 120004 75225 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 255.75 120005 75106 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 657.00 120006 .. -75294 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 547.50 120007 74327 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE - YORK SELLING 330.75 120008 75293 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNOI` SELLING" 418.25 120269 75292 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,157.75 276421 9115/2005 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 1,466.51 LIGHTING 119964 911636398 1375.6530 REPAIR PARTS PARKING RAMP 43.50 LOAD CENTER 120178 911703051 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 1,510.01 276422 9115/2005 101350 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO. 706.94 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 120179 052395 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW REVOLVING 706.94 276423 9/1512005 118195 GREEN HORIZONS 168.16 SPRINKLER REPAIR 120180 81957 01326.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS SUNNYSLOPE ST RECLAIM 168.16 276424 9/15/2005 102125 GREG LESSMAN SALES 325.21 MERCHANDISE 120092 31215 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 325.21 276425 9/15/2005 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 5.95 120009 285365 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5,574.80 120010 284034 - 962.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/14/2005 14:18:44 Council Check Register Page - 11 9/15/2005 - 9/15/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 371.31 120011 286310 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 937.55 120012 286918 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 316.53 120270 285412 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,868.53 120271 286311 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 20,074.67 276426 9115/2005 101964 GUSTAVE A. LARSON CO. 36.21 CONTACTOR 120181 BLM0091874 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 36.21 276427 911512005 103359 HANSON PIPE & PRODUCTS INC. 374.88 BASE SLABS 119965 477005384554 5932.6536 CASTINGS GENERAL STORM SEWER 274.77 CATCH BASIN 120182 477005384714 5932.6536 CASTINGS GENERAL STORM SEWER 649.65 276428 9/15/2005 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 205.44 MEAT PATTIES 120093 .018587 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 205.44 276429 9/1512005 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,242.15 120013 368708 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,242.15 276430 9/15/2005 117432 IMPERIAL SCOTT SPECIALTIES INC 400.00 FIRE NOVELTY PATCHES 120094 13300 1470.6614 FIRE PREVENTION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 400.00 276431 9115/2005 100409 IN- CONTROL INC. 260.00 VFD /PLC REPAIR 120183 05102DA01 5911.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER 260.00 276432 9115/2005 116191 INSTY- PRINTS 501.99 NEWSLETTER 120095 70874 2210.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 501.99 276433 9/15/2005 100386 J.R. JOHNSON SUPPLY INC. 107.48 SPRAYERS 120184 91225 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES - EDINBOROUGH PARK 107.48 276434 9/15/2005 100828 JERRY'S FOODS 31.01 120306 2232 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 32.50 120306 2232 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CITY OF EDINA 9/14/2005 14:18:44 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 12 9/15/2005 - 9/15/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No - Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 42.29 120306 2232 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 50.41 120306 2232 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 76.83 120306 2232 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 227.32 120306 2232 1628.6406.03 SOFTBALL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 85.48 ART CENTER 120307 08 /31 /05ART 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 545.84 276435 9/15/2005 100829 JERRY S HARDWARE 12.75- 119906 083105 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 4.45 119906 083105 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH STREET GENERAL 5.16 119906 083105 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 17.93 119906 083105 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 17.97 119906 083105 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 21.09 119906 083105 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 37.18 119906 083105 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 38.84 119906 083105 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 49.04 119906 083105 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 49.34 119906 083105 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 50.89 119906 083105 1375.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKING RAMP 51.61 119906 083105 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT,OF COURSE & GROUNDS 70.00 119906 083105 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 83.15 119906 083105 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET REVOLVING 101,18 119906 083105 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 112.54 119906 083105 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW REVOLVING 140.62 119906 083105 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 177,99 119906 083105 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 204.00 119906 083105 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 238.36 119906 083105 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 309.76 119906 083105 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 364.60 119906 083105. 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 619.62 119906 083105 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 2,752.57 276437 9/1512005 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 498.64 120014 1952712 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 723.85 120015 1952054 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING. 1,394.79 120016 1952184 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE. YORK SELLING 1,335.55 120017 1952053 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 768.30 120018 1952061 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 30.94 120019 1952066 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 493.34 120020 1952063 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 953.45 120021 1952068 '62.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation 108.50 1,355.40 267.73 1,330.12 3,153.33 4,267.63 4,666.68 2,755.10 27.98 503.82 1,713.48 3- 927 -14 276438 CITY OF EDINA EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 9/14/2005 14:18:44 REPAIR PARTS Council Check Register Page - 13 9/15/2005 - 9/15/2005 119907 083105 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 120022 1952067 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 120272 1952062 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 120273 1955116 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 120274 1955119 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 120275 1955117 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 120276 1955118 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 120277 1955111 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 120278 1955112 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 120279 1955113 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 120280 1955114 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 120281 1955115 5842.5513 - COST OF-GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 120282 1955110 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 120283 290192 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 276438 9/15/2005 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 102719 JOHNSON, PHILLIP REPAIR PARTS BUILDINGS 24.95 REPAIR RECORDER 119907 083105 5125.6180 127.79 DVD /CD WRITER 119907 083105 5125.6710 152.74 276439 9/15/2005 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY OF GOLDEN VAL - 455.22 HEATER, COUPLINGS 119966 093188 5912.6530 455.22 276440 9/15/2005 102099 KOSS PAINT COMPANY INC. 35.13 PAINT 120096 67011 5420.6406 35.13 276441 9/15/2005 100846 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO 1,230.45 120023 446160 5842.5514 48.00 .120024 446156 5842.5515 1,328.90 120025 446043 5842.5514 2,607.35 276442 9/15/2005 100847 KUNDE CO INC 1,797.71 TREE DISEASE CONTROL PROG 119967 14201 1644.6103 362.50- CREDIT ON ACCT 119968 CREDIT 1644.6103 1,435.21 276443 9/15/2005 106201 LAKE WEED HARVESTING 8,940.75 MILLPOND WEED HARVESTING 119969 324745522825 4086.6103 8,940.75 _CONTRACTED REPAIRS MEDIA STUDIO EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT MEDIA STUDIO REPAIR PARTS BUILDINGS GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE AQUATIC WEEDS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/15/2005 -- 9/15/2005 Check # Date Amount . Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No - Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 276444 9/15/2005 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 20.00 ' MEMBERSHIP DUES 119908 090105 1100.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 20.00 276445 9/15/2005 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 21,499.00 MEMBERSHIP 119909 SEPT01 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 21,499.00 2764.46 9115/2005 100853 LEEF SERVICES 36.22 SHOP TOWELS 120097 446542 5422.6201 LAUNDRY 34.25 SHOP TOWELS 120098 454317 5422.6201 LAUNDRY 70.47 276447 9/15/2005 100854 LEITNER COMPANY 3,805.55 BRAEMAR - TOPDRESSING 120099 SEP 1 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 266.25 BRAEMAR-SOD 120100 090105 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 955.94 BRAEMAR - 1 -1 -1 SOIL 120101 SEP 12005 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 5,027.74 276448 9/15/2005 103796 LINNEMANN, YVONNE 158.00 CLASS REFUND 120235 090705 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION 158.00 276449 9/15/2005 100858 LOGIS 26.44 120185 26188/26216 5910.6160 DATA PROCESSING 57.73 _ 120185 26188/26216 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING 226.68 120185 26188/26216 5840.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 236.65 120185 26188/26216 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING 278.56 120185 26188/26216 2210.6160 DATA PROCESSING 396.98 120185 26188/26216 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 427.16 120185 26188/26216 1400.6160. DATA PROCESSING 1,626.03 120185 26188/26216 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,480.50 120185 26188/26216 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING 6,756.73 276450 9/1512005 101165 M.A.A.O. 245.00 FALL CONFERENCE 120305. 091205 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 245.00 276451 9/1512005 114699 MANAGED SERVICES INC. 420.68 JANITORIAL SERV - SEPT 05 120102 . 607643 A 1.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 9/14/2005 14:18:44 Page - 14 Business Unit CITY COUNCIL ADMINISTRATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS ART CENTER REVENUES GENERAL (BILLING) ASSESSING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL FINANCE COMMUNICATIONS CENT SERV GEN - MIS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS ASSESSING PSTF OCCUPANCY R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/15/2005 -- 9/15/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No - Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 9/14/2005 14:18:44 Page- 15 Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 420.68 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 276452 9/15/2005 GENERAL MAINTENANCE 100868 MARK VII SALES 3,114.80 120026 842090 5842.5514 21.95 120027 842091 5842.5515 4,895.92 120028 841424 5842.5514 158.90 120103 841777 5430.5514 8,191.57 276453 9/15/2005 102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC 5,721.18 PHONE SYSTEM UPGRADE 119970 55914 1550.6710 5,721.18 276454 9/15/2005 111825 MCGUIRE MECHANICAL SERVICES IN 113.97 GASKET REPLACEMENT 119910 2640 1551.6103 113.97 276455 9/15/2005 111825 MCGUIRE MECHANICAL SERVICES IN 3,500.00 FINAL PAYMENT 120236 ADOPET00016 4400.6710 3,500.00 276456 9/15/2005 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 1,641.75 MUSIC MAN SQUARE 120104 9/8 TRIP 1628.6103.07 1,641.75 276457 9115/2005 101483 MENARDS 38.17 SAKRETE CONCRETE MIX 119911 53031 5630.6406 166.45 PUMP, STUDS 119912 57546 5630.6406 122.76 GLOVES, PLIERS, BALL MOUNTS 120105 55246 5422.6406 38.92 VISEGRIPS, PLIERS, TAPE 120106 51443 5422.6406 38.12 LUMBER, STUDS 120186 57288 1301.6406 404.42 276458 9/15/2005 101987 MENARDS 16.91 WEED KILLER 119913 21350 5630.6406 49.28 SPRAYER, CEMENT PATCH 120187 21806 5620.6406 89.71 MULCH, WEED BLOCK 120188 99432 5620.6406 155.90 276459 9/15/2005 100882 MERIT SUPPLY 633.36 TWO -WAY RADIOS 119914 67681 5511.6406 253.36 CORNER GUARDS 120189 67659 5620.6406 9/14/2005 14:18:44 Page- 15 Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CITY HALUPOLICE BUILDING TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9115/2005 - 9/15/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 360.40 ASPHALT RELEASE AGENT 120190 67713 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 9/14/2005 14:18:44 Page - 16 Business Unit STREET RENOVATION 1,247.12 276460 9/1512005 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY • 255.28 SOFTBALLS 119915 84837 4077.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 255.28 276461 9115/2005 100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 33,016.50 AUG 2005 120191 090605 1495.4307 SAC CHARGES INSPECTIONS 33,016.50 276462 9/1512005 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME 275,767.36 SEWER SERVICE 120192 0000806331 5922.6302 SEWER SERVICE METRO SEWER TREATMENT 275,767.36 276463 9/15/2005 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAI 161.30 WHEEL ALIGNMENT 120193 FOCS101971 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 22.02- CREDIT 120321 CM439861 FOW 1553.6530 -REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 26.05- CREDIT 120322 CM439899FOW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERA-LION GEN 113.23 _ 276464 9/15/2005 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 244.65 ASPHALT 119971 76076MB 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 17,244.90 ASPHALT 119971 76076MB 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 28.76 TACK 119972 75890MB 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 17,518.31 276465 9/15/2005 100692 MIDWEST COCA -COLA EAGAN 527.30 120029 80316123 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 609.30 120030 80767245 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 178,10 120284 80767260 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,314.70 276466 9/15/2005 103186 MIDWEST FUELS 519.42 DEISEL FUEL 120107 28239 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,017.05 FUEL 120108 28238 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 775.90 FUEL 120109 28310 5423.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF CARS 508.34 DEISEL FUEL 120110 28311 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS - 2,820.71 276467 9/15/2005 101890 MIDWEST VENDING INC 239.05 CANDY 120111 3832 - 421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/15/2005 — 9/15/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 9/14/2005 14:18:44 Page - 17 Business Unit PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION WATER PURCHASED DISTRIBUTION 239.05 GRILL GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES 276468 911512005 PLANNING 118504 MILLER, HAYLEY 94.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 120237 090905 5110.6103 94.00 276469 911512005 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 26,322.17 WATER PURCHASE 120194 090705 5913.6601 26,322.17 276470 9/15/2005 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 16.84 CARBON DIOXIDE 120112 R108050142 5421.6406 5.61 CYLINDER CHARGE 120195 R108052874 1553.6406 22.45 276471 911.5/2005 100522 MINNESOTA AIR INC. 743.23 COMPRESSOR, FILTER DRIER 120196 2054120 -00 5860.6406 743.23 276472 9/15/2005 102927 MINNESOTA'HISTORICAL SOCIETY 50.00 PRESERVATION CONFERENCE 119916 090205 1140.6104 50.00 276473 9/15/2005 102712 MINNESOTA OFFICE ENTERPRISE TE 37.00 JULY 2005 WAN 120113 DV05070267 1400.6204 37.00 276474 9/15/2005 101376 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT 2,323.83 CURB BOX REPAIR TOPS 120198 0171783 5913.6530 2,323.83 276475 9/15/2005 103240 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL 392.00 DEFENSIVE DRIVING 120114 016772 1628.6103 392.00 276476 9/15/2005 100899 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER 7,534.21 AUG 2005 120199 090605 1495.4380 7,534.21 276477 9/15/2005 101998 MINNESOTA TROPHIES & GIFTS 27.96 ENGRAVING TAGS 120115 104148 1470.6406 27.96 9/14/2005 14:18:44 Page - 17 Business Unit PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION WATER PURCHASED DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PLANNING TELETYPE SERVICE POLIO DEPT. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS SURCHARGE - INSPECTIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 120119 757391129 -033 1470.6188 CITY OF EDINA FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 237.71 120200 SEPT 5 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT Council Check Register 47.60 120201 873184124 -033 1553.6188 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 9/15/2005 -- 9/15/2005 873184124 -033 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc.No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 276478 9115/2005 120201 101753 MISSION SERVICE SUPPLY INC 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 366.42 120201 873184124 -033 60.80 TAPES FOR MEETINGS 120238 118460 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1322.6188 TELEPHONE 60.80 TAPES FOR MEETINGS 120238 118460 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL (BILLING) 296.50 194.43 TAPES FOR MEETINGS 120238 118460 1100.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 316.03 276482 911512005 111483 NICHOLSON, JEFFREY 276479 9/15/2005 102779 MSHS 120240 090805 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 110.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 120239 090105 5610.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 110.00 276480 9/15/2005 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 529.39 FERTILIZER, FUNGICIDE 119917 453822 -00 5630.6540 FERTILIZER 265.45 FUNGICIDE 119918 493505 -00 5630.6540 FERTILIZER 111.37 PROP KIT 120116 490276 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 86.27 AIR CLEANER 120117 491572 -01 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 45.12 WASHERS, BUSHINGS 120118 491572 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS . 1,037.60 276481 9/1512005 104672 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 9/14/2005 14:18:44 Page - 18 Business Unit PLANNING ENGINEERING GENERAL CITY COUNCIL ED ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTENNIAL LAKES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 417.08 120119 757391129 -033 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 237.71 120200 SEPT 5 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 47.60 120201 873184124 -033 1553.6188 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 47.60 120201 873184124 -033 4090.6188 TELEPHONE STREET REVOLVING 185.88 120201 873184124 -033 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 287.71 120201 873184124 -033 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 366.42 120201 873184124 -033 1301.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 395.24 120201 873184124 -033 1322.6188 TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 871.43 120201 873184124 -033 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 296.50 120202 737969523-015 1495.6188 TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS 3,153.17 - 276482 911512005 111483 NICHOLSON, JEFFREY 70 00 SEPT PIANO TUNING 120240 090805 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 70.00 276483 9/15/2005 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY 28.35 PALETTE PADS 119919 31894800 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 160.73 PENCILS, PADS 119920 31904600 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 189.08 276484 9/1512005 100930 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO. ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/14/2005 14:18:44 Council Check Register Page - 19 9/15/2005 - 9/1512005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No, Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 22.34 TURF SAVER 119973 NW -97551 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 239.27 TIRE, SCRAP DISPOSAL 119974- NW -97649 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 261.61 276485 9115/2005 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 4,311.36 120031 8080871 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 515.00 120032 8080884 -IN 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 551.50 120033 8080847-IN, 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,671.95 120034 8080848 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,667.00 120035 8080330 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 276.00 120036 8080014 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 41.00 120037 8080328 -IN 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 27.95 120038 8080327 -IN 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,601.91 120038 8080327 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 36.00- 120039 8080265 -CM 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 13,627.67 276486 9/15/2005 110832 PC2 SOLUTIONS, INC. 560.00 TECHNICAL SERVICES 120120 82705008 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,240.00 TECHNICAL SERVICES 120121 81305001 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,800.00 276487 9115/2005 101688 PELINKA, DICK 147.42 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 119975 090605 1652.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE WEED MOWING 147.42 276488 9/15/2005 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 339.60 119921 04271629 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES 306.65 119922 04271788 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES 660.70 120122 78506051 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 164.80 120123 04271805 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 1,471.75 276489 9/15/2005 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 94.40 120040 2236098 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,200.12 120041 2236097 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 953.70 120042 2236091 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,117.50 120043 2236095 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,566.03 120044 2236094 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,287.60 120045 2236090 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,041.00 120046 2236092 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,140.34 120285 2238307 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE. VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/1412005 14:18:44 Council Check Register Page - 20 1515.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC ARTS PROGRAM 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS -PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5422.6530 5422.6530 2210.6123 1628.6235 5110.6235 214.92 SPLIT BOOM HEDGE, REPAIRS 120243 083105STMT 5630.6406 214.92 276497 9/1512005 100964 PRECISION TURF & CHEMICAL 2,427.77 FERTILIZER 120129 25785 2,427.77 276498 9/15/2005 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 5431.6540 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS REPAIR PARTS MAINTOP, COURSE &GROUNDS MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS . POSTAGE. SENIOR CITIZENS POSTAGE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES FERTILIZER RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 9/15/2005 - 9/15/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 512.15 120286 2238305 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 83.83 120287 2238306 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 415.99 120288 2238302 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 861.41 120289 2238303 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,741.12 120290 2238304 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING . 34.25- 120291 3324073 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1515.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC ARTS PROGRAM 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS -PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5422.6530 5422.6530 2210.6123 1628.6235 5110.6235 214.92 SPLIT BOOM HEDGE, REPAIRS 120243 083105STMT 5630.6406 214.92 276497 9/1512005 100964 PRECISION TURF & CHEMICAL 2,427.77 FERTILIZER 120129 25785 2,427.77 276498 9/15/2005 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 5431.6540 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS REPAIR PARTS MAINTOP, COURSE &GROUNDS MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS . POSTAGE. SENIOR CITIZENS POSTAGE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES FERTILIZER RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 11,980.94 276490 9/1512005 118716 PILLA, MICHAEL 250.00 GLASS ARTIST 120241 090905 250.00 276491 9/15/2005 100119 PING 209.45 MERCHANDISE 120124 7584614 209.45 276492 9/15/2005 102748 PIRTEK PLYMOUTH 99.88 HOSE ADAPTORS 120125 PL28914 35.73 HYD HOSE 120126 PL28864 135.61 276493 9115/2005 101110 POLLY NORMAN PHOTOGRAPHY 200.00 ABOUT BUSINESS PHOTOS 120127 090705 200.00 276494 9/15/2005 100961 POSTMASTER 375.00 NEWSLETTER POSTAGE 120128 090905 375.00 276495 9/15/2005 100961 POSTMASTER 850.00 POSTAGE 120242 091205 850.00 276496 9/15/2005 102884 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN 1515.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC ARTS PROGRAM 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS -PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5422.6530 5422.6530 2210.6123 1628.6235 5110.6235 214.92 SPLIT BOOM HEDGE, REPAIRS 120243 083105STMT 5630.6406 214.92 276497 9/1512005 100964 PRECISION TURF & CHEMICAL 2,427.77 FERTILIZER 120129 25785 2,427.77 276498 9/15/2005 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 5431.6540 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS REPAIR PARTS MAINTOP, COURSE &GROUNDS MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS . POSTAGE. SENIOR CITIZENS POSTAGE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES FERTILIZER RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/14/2005 14:18:44 Council Check Register Page - 21 9/15/2005 -- 9/15/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No f Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419.35 120047 285675 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,068.27 120048- 286919 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,571.88 120049 286916 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 143.00 120050 286917 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,035.40 120051 286921 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,830.90 120292 284542 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6,068.80 276499 9/1512005 117721 PROSOURCE EDUCATIONAL SERVICES 1,350.00 COMPUTER TRAINING 120130 5081213 1554.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,350.00 276500 9/15/2005 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 437.74 TISSUE, ROLL TOWEL, LINERS 120244 3624 5630.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 437.74 276501 9/15/2005 113828 QUALITY RESTORATION SERVICES I 1,882.00 POTHOLE REPAIRS 119976 MIS005078 1301.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,882.00 276502 9115/2005 100971 QUALITY WINE 63.45- 120052 600083 -00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 6,402.45 120052 600083 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 20.70- 120053 599491 -00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 2,095.79 120053 599491 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 17.47- 120054 600132 -00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 1,771.25 120054 600132 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 10.46- 120055 599920 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 1,059.09 120055 599920 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 18.59- 120056 600154 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 1,879.38 120056 600154 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6.12- 120057 600133 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 619.76 120057 600133-00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2.78 - 120058 599923 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 140.00 120058 599923-00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 20.91- 120059 599750 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 1,052.55 120059 599750 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 3.98- 120060 599922 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 404.02 120060 599922 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 6.00- 120061 598784 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 600.00 120061, 598784 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 79.05- 120293 599749 -00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL CITY OF EDINA 9/14/2005 14:18:44 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 22 9115/2005 - 9/15/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3,979.56 120293 599749 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 32,81- . 120294 599921 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 1,653.54 120294 599921 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 21,375.07 276503 9115/2005 101965 QWEST 55.03 612 Z28 -0146 119923 082805 5911.6188 TELEPHONE PUMP & LIFT STATION OP.ER 57.65 612 Z28 -0146 119923 082805 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 87.90 612 Z28 -0146 119923 082805 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 98.73 612 Z28 -0146 119923 082805 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 99.49 612 Z28 -0146 119923 082805 5841.6188 - - TELEPHONE _ YORK OCCUPANCY 163.35 612 Z28 -0146 119923 082805 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 169.02 612 Z28 -0146 119923 082805 5610.6188 TELEPHONE ED ADMINISTRATION 194.15 612 Z28 -0146 119923 082805 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 218.85 612 Z28 -0146 119923 082805 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 237.98 612 Z28 -0146 119923 082805 5932.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL STORM SEWER 254.24 612 Z28 -0146 119923 .082805 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 2,199.50 612 Z28 -0146. 119923 082805 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 87.83 952 926 -0419 120203 0419 -9/05 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING'MAINTENANCE 51.35 952 926 -0092 120204 0092 -9/05 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 281.67 612 E24 -8661 120313 8661 -9/05 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 563.34 612 E24 -8659 120314 8659 -9/05 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 502.32 612 E24 -8657 120315 8657- 9/05 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 281.67 612 E24 -8656 120316 8656 -9/05 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 876.00 612 E01 -0426 120317 0426 -9/05 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 6,480.07 276504 911512005 117692 R & B CLEANING INC. 447.30 STAIRWELL CLEANING 119977 1283 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 447.30 276505 9115/2005 113422 RAKE PUBLISHING INC. 153.33 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 119924 7043 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 153.33 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 119924 7043 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 153.34 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 119924 7043 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 460.00 276506 911512005 104643 RECREATION SUPPLY COMPANY 125.83 VACUUM HOSE, CLIPS 120205 114931 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 125.83 276507 911512005 100975 RED WING SHOE STORE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/15/2005 - 9/15/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 100.00 SAFETY BOOTS 119978 725000344 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 100.00 SAFETY BOOTS 119978 725000344 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 9/14/2005 14:18:44 Page - . 23 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 200.00 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 276508 911512005 ADMINISTRATION 101111 REED BUSINESS INFORMATION ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 5610.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 191.90 AD FOR BID 120245 2991825 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 191.90 AD FOR BID 120246 2988487 127.26 AD FOR BID 120247 2991826 127.26 AD FOR BID 120248 2999969 638.32 276509 9/1512005 102637 RES SPECIALTY PYROTECHNICS 3,000.00 FIREWORKS 119925 6332 3,000.00 276510 9115/2005 104793 RESTORATION SYSTEMS INC. 275.30 HYDRANT USAGE REFUND 119979 090605 275.30 276511 9/1512005 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 13.79 SOFTENER SALT 120131 00167194 43.93 SOFTENER SALT 120132 00166963 57.72 276512 9/1512005 118001 ROZEBOOM MILLER ARCHITECTS INC 91,402.35 ARCHITECT/ENG SERVICES 120206 7 91,402.35 276513 9/15/2005 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 9/14/2005 14:18:44 Page - . 23 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 5610.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ED ADMINISTRATION 5901.4626 SALE OF WATER UTILITY REVENUES 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 272.85 RECYCLE OIL FILTERS 120133 0029626572 5422.6230 272.85 276514 9/1512005 101634 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPANY 39.03 BAKERY 120134 133909 39.03 276515 911512005 118718 SALTZMAN, WILLIAM 250.00 GLASS ARTIST 120249 090905 250.00 276516 9/15/2005 100990 SCHARBER & SONS 236.96 SPINDLE 120207 342830 5421.5510 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COST OF GOODS SOLD 1515.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS GRILL PUBLIC ARTS PROGRAM EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 9/14/2005 14:18:44 Page - 24 Business Unit GENERAL STORM SEWER EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN DIAL -A -RIDE PROGRAM GRILL PLAYGROUND & THEATER CENT SERV GEN - MIS 353.06 OVERPAYMENT REFUND 119983 090705 5900.1211.1 CITY OF EDINA UTILITY BALANCE SHEET R55CKREG LOG20000 276524 9/15/2005 106428 SOULE, GARY Council Check Register 147.88 GOLF BOOKS REIMBURSEMENT 120137 090805 5410.6513 9115/2005 -- 9/15/2005 147.88 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No . Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 236.96 2,278.55 120295 276517 9/15/2005 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 2,278.55 8.97 LUMBER 119980 40157791 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 8.97 GLASS ARTIST 120250 090905 1515.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 276518 9/15/2005 105550 SCRAP METAL PROCESSORS INC. 150.00 SEPT CONTAINER CHARGE 119981 D- COES -9 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 150.00 276519 9/15/2005 101587 SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES 3,785.00 JULY 2005 DIAL -A -RIDE 119982 090205 1514.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,785.00 276520 9/15/2005 105163 SIMPLE TO GRAND 290.21 FOOD 120135 394113 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 290.21 276521 9/15/2005 106415 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY 3,564.00 MINI -HAWK EVENT FEE 119926 324524391 1624.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,564.00 276522 9115/2005 104098 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 6,649.05 MICROSOFT LICENSING 120136 46FE3 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING 6,649.05 276523 9/15/2005 .118709 SORENSON, CASEY 9/14/2005 14:18:44 Page - 24 Business Unit GENERAL STORM SEWER EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN DIAL -A -RIDE PROGRAM GRILL PLAYGROUND & THEATER CENT SERV GEN - MIS 353.06 OVERPAYMENT REFUND 119983 090705 5900.1211.1 ACCTS RECEIVABLE MANUAL UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 353.06 276524 9/15/2005 106428 SOULE, GARY 147.88 GOLF BOOKS REIMBURSEMENT 120137 090805 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 147.88 276525 9/15/2005 101002 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS INC 2,278.55 120295 170240 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,278.55 276526 9115/2005 118717 SPAHN, DIETRICH 250.00 GLASS ARTIST 120250 090905 1515.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC ARTS PROGRAM 250.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/14/2005 14:18:44 Council Check Register Page - 25 9/15/2005 - 9/15/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Descriptidn Business Unit 276527 9115/2005 118378 SPANISH WINES IMPORTERS 291.56 120062 _ 94 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 276528 911512005 101004 SPS COMPANIES 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL 1550.6121 55.70 DRAIN PARTS 119927 51301067.001 5511.6406 55.70 451.99 TIRES 120213 10042247 276529 9115/2005 102639 STROHMYER, TOM ADVERTISING LEGAL 150.00 PERFORMANCE 9/22105 120208 090105 5610.6136 150.00 369.00 WANT AD 119928 801957 276530 9115/2005 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET WANT AD 120251 805972 180.00 REAR BUMPER REPAIR 120209 CVCB487330 1553.6530 634.14 REPAIRS 120210 CVCB488067 1553.6180 1,153.70 REPAIRS 120211 CVCB487974 1553.6180 834.00 REPAIRS 120212 CVCB487506 1553.6530 1553.6583 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION REPAIR PARTS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS REPAIR PARTS TIRES & TUBES 1550.6121 2,801.84 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL 1550.6121 276531 9/1512005 1120.6120 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 1120.6120 451.99 TIRES 120213 10042247 ADVERTISING LEGAL 451.99 ADVERTISING LEGAL 276532 9115/2005 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 369.00 WANT AD 119928 801957 388.95 WANT AD 120251 805972 369.00 WANT AD 120252 803302 135.85 PUBLISH ORDINANCE 120253 801865 135.85 AD FOR BID 120254 801864 71.50 TRANSFER OF PROPERTY NOTICE 120255 799936 117.98 PUBLISH EASEMENT 120256 799938 207.35 AD FOR BID 120257 799935 178.75 ANNUAL TIF DISCLOSURE 120258 798247 1,974.23 276533 9/1512005 101326 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO 61.96 STROBE TUBES 119929 53348 -00 61.96 276534 911512005 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 313.50 120138 383823 313.50 1553.6583 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION REPAIR PARTS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS REPAIR PARTS TIRES & TUBES 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL R55CRREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/15/2005 - 9/15/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 276535 9/15/2005 114701 TIME WARNER CABLE 50.62 0379101 -01 119930 082605 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES, 50.62 276536 9/15/2005 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 9/14/2005 14:18:44 Page - 26 Business Unit ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 25.80 WELDING SUPPLIES 119931 482606 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 19.14 CYLINDER DEMURRAGE 119984 482607 5913.6580 _ WELDING SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 39.95 WELDING GASES 119985 373092 5913.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 12.90 CYLINDER CHARGE 120214 482605 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 97.79 - 276537 9/15/2005 103982 TRAFFIC CONTROL CORPORATION 2,347.27 TRAFFIC LIGHTING 119986 17460 1330.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS 2,347.27 276538 9/1512005 103218 TRI STATE BOBCAT 1,528.70 TRENCHER REPAIR 120139. W52734 5422.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,528.70 - 276539 9/15/2005 101042 TRIARCO 425.81 PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES 120215 413325 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 425.81 276540 9/15/2005 116411 TRINITY MEDICAL SOLUTIONS INC. 1,689.95 UNIFORMS 120216 5310 5620.6201 LAUNDRY EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,689.95 276541 9/15/2005 102489 TWIN CITY CONCRETE PRODUCTS CO 246.30 MORTAR 119987 0000249114 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 246.30 276542 9/15/2005 102255 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO 122.50 OXYGEN 120140 843185 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 59.41 OXYGEN 120141 843181 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 181.91 276543 9/1512005 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 383.40 SEED 120142 12910 5431.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 670.95 SEED 120143 12946 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,054.35 R55CKREG LOG20000 2,817.64 REFUSE 119933 CITY OF EDINA 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH _ 3,288.00 REFUSE Council Check Register 324745522825 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH - 6,105.64 9/1512005 - 9/15/2005 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 276544 9/15/2005 103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 69.98 UNIFORM PURCHASE 120219 3,214.49 WATER MAIN REPAIR 120217 9821 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 69.98 3,214.49 276545 9/15/2005 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 116869 VANCE BROTHERS INC. 73.73 BEARING & SHAFT 120218 7825 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 73.73 1,269.80 120064 123272 -00 276546 9/15/2005 VERNON SELLING 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 804.35 120296 123270 -00 5822.5513 78.81 TIRES 119932 21146 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 173.68 GOLF CAR AXLE 120144 20774 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 252.49 276547 9/15/2005 120065 103466 WASTE MANAGEMENT- SAVAGE MN COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 9/14/2005 14:18:44 Page 27 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTENNIAL LAKES GOLF CARS 2,817.64 REFUSE 119933 325364322827 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH _ 3,288.00 REFUSE 119934 324745522825 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH - 6,105.64 276548 9/15/2005 117074 WEIERKE, DAVID 69.98 UNIFORM PURCHASE 120219 090905 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING. MAINTENANCE 69.98 276549 9/1512005 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 420.80 120063 123274 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,269.80 120064 123272 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 804.35 120296 123270 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,494.95 276550 9/15/2005 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 72.95 120065 133683. 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 727.40. 120066 133684 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,288.95 120297 134202 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 951.60 120298 128383 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,121.10 120299 128384 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 844.60- 120300 25081 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,871.60- 120301 25082 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,485.85 120302 134201 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 96.75- 120303 25696 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,834.90 276551 9/1512005 112954 WISCONSIN TURF EQUIPMENT CORP. 143.27 BLADES 119988 518584 -000 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY OF EDINA 9/14/2005 14:18:44 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 28 9/15/2005 -- 9/1512005 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No . Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,039.77 AXLE SHAFT 120145 518168 - 000 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 825.68 AXLE PARTS 120146- 518095 -000 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,008.72 276552 9115/2005 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 414.71 _120304 168721 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 414.71 276553 9/15/2005 101726 XCEL ENERGY 143.78 51- 6229265 -9 119935 39311376 1481.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK FIRE STATION 919.88 51- 6229265 -9 119935 '39311376 1470.6185 LIGHT & POWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,083.92 51- 69799484 119936 39652275 5821.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 1,653.50 51- 6979948 -4 119936 39652275 5861.6185 LIGHT & POWER VERNON OCCUPANCY 1,778.05 51- 69799484 119936 39652275 5841.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK OCCUPANCY 24.66 51 -4151897 -6 119937 39595698 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 4,501.03 51- 6621207 -1 119938 39966011 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 60,132.69 51- 5605640 -1 119939 39516072 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 89.62 51- 5938955 -6 119940 39629198 4086.6185 LIGHT & POWER AQUATIC WEEDS 3,444.55 51- 6840050 -6 120259 39665129 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER 4,329.57 51- 5619094 -8 120318 40454213 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 7,565.75 51- 6824328 -7 120319 40481000 5420.6185 LIGHT & POWER CLUB HOUSE 4,429.51 51- 5888961 -7 120320 40455138 1375.6185 LIGHT & POWER PARKING RAMP 90,096.51 276554 9/1512005 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 391.46 AUG USAGE - ADMIN 119941 012028505 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 125.05 AUG USAGE - PARK &REC 119942 012028508 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 26.00 AUG USAGE - BLDG 119943 012028507 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 542.51 276555 9115/2005 118288 XO COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES INC 604.87 PHONE/DATA 119944 17593387 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 604.87 276556 9115/2005 101091 ZIEGLER INC 345.00 GENERATOR CONTRACT 119989 E3809718 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 345.00 276557 9/15/2005 102960 ZUHRAH SHRINE FLAMES 100.00 PERFORMANCE 9/27/05 120220 090105 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 100.00 r R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation 970,552.41 Grand Total CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/1512005 — 9/1512005 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 970,552.41 Total Payments 970,552.41 Business Unit 9/14/2005 14:18:44 Page- 29 R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/14/2005 14:38:05 Council Check Summary Page - 1 9/1512005 - 9/15/2005 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 304,012.38 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 1,743.09 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 22,170.13 05100 ART CENTER FUND 2,439.07 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 2,545.23 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 30,422.16 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 1,536.74 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 12,493.47 05800 LIQUOR FUND 163,981.23 05900 UTILITY FUND 392,130.25 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 1,521.60 05950 RECYCLING FUND 33,874.00 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 1,683.06 Report Totals 970,552.41 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing po ' 'es and procedures date '4 on —Lopgo— Finance City 9705 Data Park Minnetonka, MN 55343 Phone (612) 522 -5200 TIME WARNER CABLE September 13, 2005 Ms. Jennifer Bennerotte City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Jennifer: Sent via Email and U.S. Mail 3 As you may recall, Time Warner Cable informed you of the pending move of our server - based, digital playback system within our Eden Prairie offices as part of a larger remodeling of our Headend in a July 21, 2005 letter. Difficulties with the reassembly of the system resulted in delays in resuming cablecasting and audio problems. We worked with the system manufacturer through consultation and diagnosis via an online system connection and were able to restore playback functionality within a few days. For reasons we are today studying closely with the manufacturer, since late Friday of last week, the system again started acting like it did shortly after the move. We were able to correct the problem Friday with a reboot. Our Headend staff and Public Affairs staff have been working on this or have been on alert since Friday. After a stable weekend, the problem reappeared Monday afternoon and this time the reboot was only partially effective. We regret that many of yesterday's Southwest Community TV programs appeared with incorrect audio, late or not at all. With additional input from the manufacturer we were able to restore the system at noon today — a faulty cable was found. Additional troubleshooting has been recommended and we will continue to look for potential problems and attempt to make the system fail this afternoon prior to today's cablecast schedule. We initiated use of the digital playback system several years ago to provide our customers and clients with a state -of -the -art playback system. Analog formats that we have used for decades are no longer supported or are being phased out. We have introduced new digital formats. Unfortunately, technical difficulties are amplified when computers, servers and software are involved. We continue on a high state of alert with regard to the playback system. We will not assume that we have corrected all underlying problems. In an effort to provide additional stability, the manufacturer is sending us upgraded software and we will install this with notice to our users and to you. Our goal throughout this process has been to improve our ability to provide stable, dependable playback. The difficulties following our move and the reappearance of those difficulties yesterday are greatly disappointing to me personally as they are to our staff. We apologize for the difficulties our system errors have created for you and your viewers. Michelle Glynn and I will continue to keep you updated on steps taken to further improve and stabilize our playback system. Please don't hesitate to call me at 952- 607- 4203/cell 612- 730 -4312 or Michelle at 952- 607 -4504 with any questions, comments, ideas or concerns. Thank you. Sincerely, Lance Leupold Director of Public Affairs and Programming Copy: Brian Grogan, Administrator, Southwest Suburban Cable Commission September 14, 2005 Chief Mike Siitari Edina Police Department 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 RE: POLICE OFFICER BRANDON SHEFFERT Dear Chief Sittari: The purpose of contacting you is to share with you my recent experience with Police Officer Brandon Sheffert. Police Officer Sheffert came to my home on Monday, September 5, 2005, to advise me of the sudden death of my brother. Needless to say, this was shocking and devastating news to hear. Although the situation itself was very surreal as well as sad and sorrowful for me, I truly was aware and extremely impressed with how Police Officer Sheffert conducted himself. He was very professional, extended himself and asked if there was anything he could do, assisted me in helping me to move forward to contact my family members, initiated the call to the Medical Examiners Office so I could get information concerning my brother's death, displayed kindness, care and empathy to myself and the situation, waited with me until my sister arrived and when departing asked if there was anything else he could do before leaving me. While these may be protocol and an ordinary chain of events and actions for a trained police officer to do, it truly was his personal conduct and personal attributes that I am commenting on. He was exemplary! As his Chief, I did want to forward my thoughts to you. As his Chief, you should know and hear from the people he has served. He definitely is an asset to your department and to the community. Please extend my comments and thoughts to Police Officer Sheffert and thank him again for me personally in his handling of a very difficult situation with such professionalism, kindness, empathy and consideration — it truly was appreciated! Sincerely, Kathy Lange 5004 W. 56th St. Edina, MN 55436 Ph 952 - 922 -6609 cc: Police Officer Brandon Sheffert It Metropolitan Council September 8, 2005 Dear Local Official: Enclosed is a preliminary housing performance score for your community for 2005, determined pursuant to the Guidelines for Priority Funding for Housing Performance (appropriate pages of the criteria enclosed). In large part, the scoring is based upon information provided by your community in our recent survey. I am sending a copy of this letter and enclosure to both the city administrator /manager or township clerk and the person to whom the housing survey questionnaire was originally sent. In June, we mailed surveys asking communities to complete and return them in July. In early July, we sent a follow up asking that the unreturned surveys be completed by the end of July. In August, we began our process of determining preliminary scores from the information in the surveys. The enclosed score sheet indicates the preliminary points by criteria for your community. Points for criteria 1, 2, 3, and 5 are based on Council data compiled from information provided by state or county agencies, local government, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency, and local Housing and Redevelopment Authorities. Scores for the remaining criteria are based on the information provided to the Council via the survey. If we did not receive a completed survey or information was not provided for any survey question, the score for those applicable criteria will reflect this. The score sheet also indicates the final performance score for your community in 2004. If, after reviewing these scores you want to provide additional information in order to improve your score in any criterion, or you believe you should have received more points in any criterion given your answers, please send me the information or call me as soon as possible. Because funding decisions for all three Livable Communities Act funding accounts have, or will shortly begin, and the housing performance scores will be a factor in those funding decisions, I ask that you provide any additional information no later than Friday, September 23. Final performance scores for 2005 will be mailed to all communities in October. Please call me at (651) 602 -1418 if you have any questions or want to discuss your community's housing performance score. GGy D. Peterson Director, Housing and Livable Communities Enclosures cc: w /enclosure: City Administrator/Manager . Township Clerk 1 111 k: R'V I.. 1n r. Mo c Foith:- :`T R ,' N-2 ; t; I Is, SQ :ct;{ ol'd W11" www.metrocouncil.org Metro Info Line 602 -1888 230 East Fifth Street • St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 -1626 • (651) 602 -1000 • Fax 602 -1550 • TTY 291 -0904 An Equal Opportunity Employer 1 9 1 t Guidelines for Priority Funding for Housing Performance January 2003 Metropolitan Council Building communities that work Affordability and Diversification 0 to 8 points 1. Municipalities are ranked according to the percent of their owner- occupied housing (homesteads) with an assessed valuation equal to or lower than an amount affordable to households at 80 percent of area median income, and their total number of mobile homes. 0 to- 8 points -- I - Munioipalities -are ranked aeeerding -t& the-pereent-e their total-housing stock that is comprised of rental units affordable to households of low- and moderate - income (50 percent of area median income or less). This includes all federally subsidized rental units — public housing, Section 8 housing, units subsidized by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, units developed with the use of low- income housing tax credits, units developed with the assistance of MHFA, the LCA Fund or the assistance of a local fiscal tool or housing finance initiative. 0 to 8 points 3. Municipalities are ranked according to the percent of their housing stock that is comprised of units that are not single family detached units developed in the typical detached housing site plan approach. These units may include twinhomes, quads, apartments, townhomes, condominiums, detached townhomes, mobile homes, and units developed with a zero -lot line. 0 to 10 points 4. Municipalities are ranked according to the percent of net units added to their housing stock that are affordable — both ownership and rental since the Council began monitoring in 1996. These "new" units may include units that have been "preserved" as affordable for a definitive period of time because of public or private re- investment to retain their affordability. ( "Net units" means that affordable habitable units, not including units on land with a property tax classification of 4C, removed as the result of a city initiative will be subtracted from the total new affordable units.) 0 to 3 points 5. Housing for special needs Municipalities are awarded up to three points for the following types of special housing within their jurisdiction: • Housing for which federal, state, county or local funds or those of a non - profit organization have been used to purchase and operate residential units or provide licensed housing that is not for the purposes of incarceration, but as a transitional placement of adult offenders or adjudicated delinquents • A publicly subsidized or non - profit group home licensed by the Department of Health or Department of Human Services which provides temporary or permanent housing for the physically handicapped, mentally ill, developmentally disabled or chemically dependent G • A shelter which is publicly subsidized and/or operated by a non - profit group to provide temporary housing for homeless persons and families, battered women or those not otherwise able to secure private housing • Housing for individuals and families who are homeless, but with a transitional stay of six to 24 months, and the assistance of advocates, can work towards housing stability and self - sufficiency to obtain permanent housing. Each instance of such housing is worth 1 point. Local Initiatives -to Facilitate Affordable Workforce- Housing- Development or Preservation 0 to 15 points 6. Fiscal Tools and Initiatives The municipality has in place adopted local policy in its comprehensive plan or local housing plan that allows and encourages the use of a local fiscal tool or initiative and has used such a local fiscal tool to assist affordable workforce or life -cycle housing development or preservation. Examples of such fiscal tools include but are not limited to the following: • Tax increment financing • Housing revenue bonds • General obligation bonds • A local property tax levy • Local tax abatement • Local fee waivers or reductions • Credit enhancements • Taxable revenue bonds • Land write -down or sale • Collaboration and participation with a community land trust or other non - profit organization to preserve long -term affordability The use of federal or state dollars is only applicable if such dollars may be used for activities other than the development or preservation of affordable and life -cycle housing but the municipality has chosen by policy to use them for affordable housing development or preservation. (i.e., CDBG dollars used for housing development or preservation) Each local fiscal tool or initiative is worth 3 points. 0 to 15 points 7. Initiatives regarding local regulation and development requirements The municipality has in the previous two calendar years allowed the reduction, adjustment or elimination of a local official control, or development or local code requirement as a cost avoidance or reduction measure in order to facilitate the development or preservation of affordable .workforce or life -cycle housing, OR has in place in its policies and official controls a commitment to make such reductions, adjustments or eliminations of requirements when they are requested by a developer in order to facilitate the development or preservation of affordable or life- 7 cycle housin&or since 1996, has taken the` initiative to revise its land use regulation and official controls to such ae degree that these revisions can be shown to be permitting greater density and more frequent opportunity for reduced development costs than existed before 1996. Examples of these initiatives in the use of official controls include but are not limited to the following: • The use of a density bonus system, inclusionary housing requirements or some other innovative zoning approach •• The use of variances, rezoning, special use or conditional permits or similar variations from the standards set forth in the community's zoning -- -ordinance-for- ose uffacii-i�tatin 'a s �Pm'P g specific-affordab-letausirrg. development. • A local initiative undertaken to revise local design requirements for public improvement that may reduce the cost of public services to residential properties. • Modifications `in public services standards or requirements that might include streets, curbs, gutter, sewer and water hookups, street lighting and other required public improvements in order to reduce development costs to increase affordability in a new residential development. • A reduction of such standards as the required street right -of -way, or surfacing width or depth design for residential street, or the size of sewer or water service lines to new housing. Each local, initiative is worth 3 points. No more than 6 points may be applicable to any one affordable or life -cycle housing development or preservation activity aided by these local regulative measures. 0 to 15 points 8. Initiatives regarding housing preservation and rehabilitation The municipality has in place and has in the previous two calendar years used and promoted locally- initiated or administered (city or county) housing preservation, home improvement and/or rehabilitation programs, or other tools available to its residents to keep their housing stock in sound condition. Examples of these initiatives include but are not limited to the following: • A housing maintenance code and enforcement program for rental housing • A housing maintenance code and enforcement program for owner - occupied housing • A housing rehabilitation loan or grant program for rental housing • A housing rehabilitation loan or grant program for owner- occupied housing • A home improvement loan or grant program • A home improvement resource center • A local tool - sharing center or program Each local initiative is worth 3 points. 8 d 9. Density of residential development The average net density of new (or re -use) sewered housing for which a building permit was issued in the municipality in the two previous calendar years multiplied by the total number of such units in those two years are compared among all communities. Sewered communities are ranked highest to lowest, unsewered communities are ranked lowest to highest. Points will only be given to sewered communities with an overall density of three units per acre or greater and only to unsewered communities for which the 1998 local comprehensive plan update has been put into effect. Sewered Communities 1 to 6 points a. The average net density for attached housing units, i.e., units per acre multiplied by the number of such units permitted in the last two calendar years. 1 to 6 points b. The average net density for detached housing units (including detached townhomes and manufactured homes), i.e., units per acre multiplied by the number of such units permitted in the last two calendar years. Unsewered Communities 1 to 12 points The average net density of residential development multiplied by the number of all units permitted in the last two calendar years 0 or 6 points 10. In the previous two calendar years, the municipality has acquired land to be held specifically for the development of affordable or senior housing (exclusively 55 +), or has approved (permits may be drawn at any time) the development or local financial participation in a proposed development of new affordable or senior (exclusively 55 +) housing, or the involvement of the municipality in the preservation and reinvestment in such housing — ownership or rental — which has not as yet been undertaken for reasons beyond the municipality's control. Points will be awarded according to the number of units involved in the proposal as follows: 2 points — less than 20 units or land acquisition for future housing 4 points — 20 to 39 units 6 points — 40 or more units E Preliminary Housing Performance Score — 2005 Name of City / Township CC C41, w Criteria —100 points possible 1. 3 2. 3 3. 7 4. /D 5. 3 6. /< 7. D s. l� 9. a. �l b. Z 10. �3 Total Score 2005 Total Score 2004 \'',,ML'I'C MEARS\ I) ATA'' FUSE RS\SIIAREI) \I.,IBRAIt.�`;L..iv_ Comm Move l'oldeeI' ft_1ZSON130O";lilsa Peif,08'1iUS__fIYS eity- twnshp.doe EDINA PARK BOARD 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS EDINA CITY HALL JUNE 14, 2005 MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: George Klus, Jeff Johnson, Linda Presthus, Todd Fronek, Jeff Sorem, Karla Sitek, Ray O'Connell, Jessica Selleck Mike Damman, Andy Finsness, Mike Weiss John Keprios, Ed MacHolda, Janet Canton, Vince Cockriel OTHERS PRESENT: John Peyton, Jim Fehrenbach, Sue Kelly, Jan Bernatz, Charlie Kelly, Tim Creajan, Jeff Bowers, Tim Campion, Molly Cronin, Pat Cronin, Nick Cronin, Kathleen Carter, Greta Simondet, Katie Meehan, Tim Meehan, Corrin Carlson, Al Carlson, Brad Benson, Ken Cutler, Craig Flom, Neal Campion, Nancy Hall, Doug Hall, Randy Sawnstrom, Jill Hartman, Albert Walla, Bill Reber, Bob Kaiser, Jon Moon, Julie Risser, Jean White, Heidi Dorfineister, Jeannie Hanson Is I. APPROVAL OF THE MAY 10, 2005 PARK BOARD MINUTES Linda Presthus MOVED TO APPROVE THE MAY 10, 2005 PARK BOARD MINUTES. Jeff Sorem SECONDED THE MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED. II. UPDATES A. GMasium Project — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that they are moving along on the gymnasium project. He noted that the School Board has learned that bids are coming in higher than what they had expected; and the price tag is around 5.2 million dollars to which they've now had to cut back on some things. He added that they are almost down to a bare bones facility and thinks they are going to have to live with whatever the price tag is and make a decision at that point. B. Youth Athletic Association Presidents & Connecting With Kids Joint Meeting - Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that they have a joint meeting coming up with the Youth Athletic Association Presidents and some of the Connecting with Kids positional leaders that is going to be hosted by the International Dairy Queen this Friday. He noted that the association presidents would be discussing some common topics. He pointed out that the Connecting With Kids positional leaders have a strong interest in the over - programming of youth. They also want to know more about how the athletic associations are training their coaches with regards not just the sport itself but also in raising and nurturing the youth. Mr. Keprios stated that they are all in it for the same mission which is to develop youth. He noted that he feels the Connecting With.Kids initiative.can play an important role in helping them accomplish that goal with some parental education. He indicated that he thinks some of the best ways to raise kids when it comes to youth sport is to try to find out how much is enough and how much is too much. C. Grandview Square Park Development — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that the Grandview Square Park project is within their final 10% of fundraising, and the Community Foundation is assisting with the final stage of fundraising. He noted that their fundraising is only about $5,000 short of the goal. He indicated that he anticipates that the Edina Community Foundation will approach the businesses of Grandview Square to see if they can help fill that last void. He noted that he anticipates the construction to be completed late August or early September. III. TODD PARK HOCKEY RINK PROPOSAL Mr. Klus gave an overview of the May Park Board meeting. He noted that residents who live around Todd Park were asked to voice their comments regarding permanent boards for an ice rink at Todd Park. He indicated that the Park Board heard from people who were both for and against the project. Mr. Klus pointed out that the Edina Hockey Association (EHA) was also invited to attend the Park Board meeting to address some of their needs to which no one from the EHA attended. He explained that EHA has stated that they do not want to be short one hockey rink in the community unless they absolutely had to; however, they do need outdoor rinks especially because the program is continuing to grow. Mr. Klus indicated that the Park Board tabled this item until the June Park Board meeting. Mr. Keprios explained that they have been working with EHA to look at developing a rink at Lewis Park to which a copy of the outline is in the Park Board's packet. He pointed out that the three page Request For Proposal document was put together to outline the concept of what the Park Board and the EHA has in mind to have a feasibility study done on building a second rink at Lewis Park. He pointed that this would not be an ordinary outdoor hockey rink but rather they would look at putting in artificial refrigeration to which both rinks would then be maintained with an ice - resurfacing machine. They would use the spare ice - resurfacing machine that they currently have at Braemar Arena, however, they would need a place to store it to which they would need to either build something or retrofit the existing shelter building. He noted that part of the concept would also look at possibly building a structure over the second rink which would be aesthetically pleasing as well as it could double as a picnic shelter during the summer. Therefore, the EHA has agreed to pay for a feasibility study to which a Request For Proposal was been sent out to 17 different architect engineering consulting firms. Mr. Keprios noted that of the five proposals they received back the studies ranged anywhere from accomplishing the project in seven to fifteen weeks and cost ranging from $7,500 to $30,000. He stated that the information will be presented to the EHA to look over and if they were to go with the low bid the study could be completed within seven K weeks, which would be pertinent to tonight's discussion. He commented that they may find that it's not even feasible to put in artificial refrigeration, however, if it can be determined in less than seven weeks there would still be the possibility of putting in an outdoor hockey rink at Lewis Park. They wouldn't necessarily have to have refrigeration and perhaps then Lewis Park could become the alternate site to the loss of Countryside Park. Mr. Keprios explained that the issue came about due to the removal of the hockey rink boards at Countryside Park because of its age, deterioration, and unsalvageable condition. The reason for not immediately replacing that hockey rink in its current location is due to its improper orientation and poor sub -soil conditions. He noted that it is still staff's recommendation that a master plan be implemented prior to replacing an outdoor hockey rink at Countryside Park. He noted that's not to say they can't put a hockey rink back at Countryside Park in its current improper orientation, however, that's not stars recommendation because they feel it's improper use of $40,000. Staff feels that money would be money better spent to place the hockey rink at a different park until Countryside Park can be done correctly with a master plan. Mr. Keprios pointed out that he did list a few choices for the Park Board to consider. Based on input from the EHA, his first recommendation would be to build a second rink at Lewis Park which developed into a discussion of possibly putting in a fourth rink at Braemar. However, after a meeting with the EHA and Larry Thayer, Braemar Arena Manager, it was decided that would not be very feasible at this point. At that point it was Is decided that a better option would be to pursue an artificial refrigeration rink at Lewis Park, however, they don't want to be left short one outdoor rink for the 2005 -2006 season. Therefore, it was decided to look at another park, that being Todd Park. Mr. Keprios indicated that at the May Park Board meeting the motion that was passed was to table the issue because there were some concerns about the quality of ice at Todd Park. He noted that Vince Cockriel, Park Superintendent, is here to try and answer some of the questions and concerns. Mr. Klus stated that it was also discussed that if a hockey rink is not put in at Todd Park what they see the future being for Todd Park. He noted that it is a community park, which needs to be used for the youth in the community. He commented that at some point he does see this becoming an issue if there is not a hockey rink. In addition, one option that could become debatable is whether or not the area would be turned into a multi- purpose field. He noted that the city is always short on all- purpose fields that they would need to find a use for that area that could benefit the youth in our community. Mr. Klus stated that the Park Board would like to do all they can to recommend to the City Council that they don't lose a hockey rink this year. They really need to keep the same number of hockey rinks as last year. Mr. Cockriel explained that Todd Park is currently set up as one of the lower maintained rinks because there are no hockey boards. Their maintenance schedule is set up around 3 maintaining the hockey rinks first because the sweepers come through at 3:00 am. Therefore, if they don't get to the hockey rinks within the next couple of hours the snow will heat up as they are blowing it from side to side against the boards to which it will then start to freeze up. He explained that someone has to come right behind the sweeper in order for the boards to get cleaned. Mr. Cockriel pointed out that they start on the north end at Weber Park and work their way along the northern part of the city and depending upon what time they get to Todd Park they sometimes need to skip that rink. Therefore, because Todd Park is last on the list, they typically flood it with a tanker truck, which in their experience using a tanker is not the way to get quality ice. He noted that they typically have two people on the rink with a hose; however, not having boards to flood against is not efficient use of manpower. Mr. Cockriel informed the Park Board that the turf underneath the ice at Todd Park has absolutely nothing to do with the quality of ice. He noted that 3/4 of his staff have been doing this for more than 20 years and they actually prefer Todd Park to Weber, Strachauer, Cornelia School or Creek Valley. He added that all of those parks have high water tables; however, the one thing Todd Park has that the others don't is better drainage. Therefore, making a good sheet of ice at Todd Park is absolutely no issue whatsoever. Mr. Sorem asked when were the previous boards taken out at Todd Park and what was the reason for it. Mr. Cockriel replied that he believes it was around 1989 and the reason was because of poor hockey board conditions, low usage and because it probably had the worst shelter building in the city at that time. Mr. Sorem asked how many years was the hockey rink there prior to it being taken down to which Mr. Cockriel replied at least a dozen. 0 Richard Miller, 5340 Hollywood Road, indicated that he has lived on Vandervork or Hollywood Road for the past 35 years and he cannot conceive how you can have a recreation program in Minnesota without having a hockey rink. In addition, he also feels that it increases the value of their neighborhood as well as it increases the value of his own property by having an all -season recreational opportunity in their community. Jim Fehrenbach, 8 Spur Road, indicated that he has two young boys ages 4 and 5. He noted that he grew up in Roseville and was able to walk to the hockey rink where he learned to play hockey, boot hockey, whiffle ball and football. He commented that he stayed out of a lot of trouble by having that hockey rink. He added that he had a lot of fun there and has some wonderful memories. He stated that he would really like to see a hockey rink put in at Todd Park. Pat Cronin, 23 Cooper Avenue, indicated that he lives in the Hilldale neighborhood and for the record he clocked the distance and is 300 yards from Todd Park. He stated that no one in his neighborhood was informed of what is currently happening at Todd Park and that the Hilldale neighborhood does consider Todd Park to be their closest park. No one from his neighborhood was at the May Park Board meeting because they were unaware of what was happening. Mr. Cronin stressed that the Park Board needs to understand that 4 the vocal minority of people who were at the May Park Board meeting does not represent the neighborhood of Todd Park. Mr. Cronin pointed out that the neighborhood is flourishing with kids. He noted that he has two young boys who use the park all year and commented that it's hard to play sports on a sheet of ice without boards and that's the reason for low attendance. If you build a rink they will come because there are hundreds of kids in the area. Mr. Cronin explained that he is also here to represent EHA. He noted that he has been a hockey coach in the youth program for 11 years and that some of the best memories of his life have been coaching and playing hockey. He stated that he doesn't think this is an EHA issue but rather a neighborhood issue. Mr. Cronin stated that he does have some input from the EHA and read a letter from Hockey Board member Chips Gulbronson. The letter read "I'm sorry that I'm unable to attend this meeting but I have an interest on two levels as to why I would support adding hockey boards at Todd Park. I am a director on the EHA and my main responsibilities include registration and manager liaison. The program is continuing to grow and will exceed 1,200 skaters this year, what a great program. We have over 450 mite players who are typically the skaters who play outside. We are the largest association in the state as we continue to grow we will need more facilities. My managers find it increasingly more difficult to schedule ice time and are utilizing the existing outdoor rinks to their full capacity. The bottom line is we need more options to provide our residents with a quality program. My interest on the second level is that I am a resident of the Hilldale neighborhood and daily drive by Todd Park and see the beautiful warming house, which our tax dollars have built that is severely under- utilized. I grew up in Edina and believe the reason people continue to want to live in our community is because of the schools and everything Edina has to offer. One of those things is our great park and recreation department. Thank you. We need to keep moving forward to provide residents with great facilities. This will continue to increase property values and people will want to live in Edina. I think it would be in poor judgment not to allow hockey boards to be installed at Todd Park ". Mr. Cronin added that Ms. Gulbronson could not be here because of a soccer engagement with her kids. Ken Cutter, 19 Circle West, indicated that they moved to Edina in 1989 in part because of the proximity to Todd Park, which is approximately 300 yards. He stated that his daughter started skating there when she was approximately 8 years old and he really liked the fact that she could walk there without having to cross busy streets. He commented that Todd Park is viewed as a neighborhood park for that Hilldale neighborhood it is an important part of the neighborhood. He noted that his daughter was disappointed when the quality of ice deteriorated rapidly as she got older. However, this is something that does attract people to the neighborhood. He added that the park was also utilized by her older brother as they were growing up. Doug Hall, 4501 Parkside Lane, indicated that he has lived in his house since 1980, which is very close to the park. He noted that he grew up playing hockey in Edina and the one difference he has seen over the years is that the parks are being used by more families. It used to be that the hockey rinks were only used by an older group of boys and that families weren't around. However, what he sees now is that after a fresh snow �1 he sees families bringing their children to the Park and spending hours there. Mr. Hall stated that if there are ice quality and utilization issues then he thinks the Park Board needs to address the whole family and not just the narrow segment of the hockey community. Jeff Bisson, 9 Cooper, indicated that he has lived in this area a better part of his almost 40 years. He noted that Todd Park had a skating rink in the early 70's because he was approximately two years old. He stated that at that time the park was called Division Park and commented that a very important series of experiences in his life happened at the hockey rink at Todd Park. He commented that he was at the hockey rink with his brothers and their friends all of the time unsupervised and it was the warming house attendant who watched over them. Mr. Bisson noted that all of his recollections are that it was a family experience and a family place. He pointed out that the demographics of the neighborhood have changed since 1989 because now there are a lot more kids. Colleen Lucke, 15 Cooper Avenue, indicated that she is in favor of having a hockey rink even though her kids do not play hockey. However, her family loves to play pick -up hockey. She explained that for the past three years her family has been part of a group that reserves the Highland Park skating rink every Sunday night for their families to play hockey and have treats. Ms. Lucke stated that skating has been a big part of their social life and they've never had a problem even at the parks that are highly used for hockey. Therefore, they would love to see a hockey rink exist at Todd Park because it would be a nice place for families of all ages to enjoy. Michelle Sit, 23 Circle West, indicated that she has three kids and they enjoy the park all year. She noted that she drives by Todd Park on her way to other hockey rinks within Edina for her hockey players. She stated that her 7 year -old daughter had her birthday party at Todd Park and commented that they would love to have skating parties and boot hockey parties at Todd Park to get to know their neighbors better. Therefore, it would be great to be able to use a hockey rink at Todd Park during the winter months. Jeff Bowers, 12 Cooper Avenue, indicated that he moved to Edina last summer and on one of the first days of winter he thought it would be a great place to take his 2 '/2 year - old daughter to go skating. However, the warming house-was closed so they sat in the snow and put on their skates and needless to say they didn't last too long because she was freezing. He noted that it's such a beautiful facility and from a cost standpoint there really should be a hockey rink, his family would definitely use it. In addition, he thinks having the older kids playing hockey there is a great thing, it keeps them out of trouble. Mr. Bowers stated that it would be great to have a neighborhood park flourish all year. Nancy Hall, 4501 Parkside Lane, indicated that she lives right across the street from Todd Park and doesn't understand why no one has been using the rink that is there. She noted that she hears the trucks every day at 6:30 am so it is definitely getting sprayed. She stated that she doesn't understand why people would now want start to use the rink just because of hockey boards. Z John Peyton, 27 Cooper Circle, indicated that he has been involved with hockey for a lot It of years and has a couple of kids who play hockey. He noted that he drives by the rink a lot and no one is using it, however, having grown up in front of a hockey rink he knows that if you build it they will come. People don't want to play hockey on an open sheet of ice. It would be a great benefit if a hockey rink were put in at Todd Park. Mr. Peyton pointed out that when he moved to the area in 1989 there weren't very many kids but now there are a ton of young kids who would use that rink. Neal Campion, 4436 Vandevork Avenue, indicated that he thinks there are a lot of concerns from people who live by the park that it's not going to be maintained the other 42 to 44 weeks of the year. He noted that they have all driven by and looked at permanent hockey boards and the way they are maintained and it does become a real eye sore. He stated that he remembers in 1989 a comment was made that from that time forward any park with boards would need to have a four -season surface. Therefore, what is really being talked about is taking a significant part of the park and it would be used for 8 to 10 weeks and for the other 42 to 44 weeks there would be no use to speak of for that portion of the park. He pointed out that if temporary boards were put up and taken down each season they would have back that portion of the park when it's not the hockey season. In other words the majority of the year they would have the use of that area. He noted that it seems rather than spend money to put up and take down the boards each season you're doing it the cheap way by leaving them up all year. Mr. Campion stated that the boards are going to be neglected and vandalized and 10 to 20 years from now you are going to have to put up new boards because these will have then been destroyed. He explained that his thoughts are if temporary boards are put up there will probably be less resistance from the neighborhood. He added they could charge a fee for the people who use the rink, the EHA. Mr. Campion commented that if there are 350 kids in the mite program why not put a surcharge on them and they can pay for putting up and taking down the removable hockey boards. Mr. Campion indicated that a comment was recently made that Todd Park is 30 plus acres. He informed the Park Board that a couple of people did measure the park and there is approximately 7 acres of useable open space. Therefore, it's not as large as they were lead to believe. He pointed out that this is a very busy park and it's good to see a lot of kids in the area, however, to take 42 to 44 weeks of the year seems to him to not be very efficient use of the area. Molly Cronin, 11 Cooper Avenue, indicated that she grew up in a house that backed up to Walnut Ridge Park. She explained that when her parents built that house in 1984 they knew the park was there. She noted one of the reasons they loved to be there was so during the winter they could see all of the skaters. She commented that it's not as if they moved in not knowing that these things existed. They knew that if they wanted to get a view of the beauty and open space they would have to deal with the people working very hard at 3:00 am on those cold winter mornings. Ms. Cronin pointed out that during the summer while growing up next to Walnut Ridge Park they played inside of the hockey boards all of the time because it provided a great sort of boundary for them to play. They never considered it an eyesore. She commented that as a mother of young children she 7 would love it if there were boards so she wouldn't have to worry about flying pucks hitting her children. Al Carlson, 4424 Vandervork, indicated that if you look at the actual useable open space of Todd Park it's probably one of the most developed parks in Edina. He stated that personally he is not opposed to the hockey rink as long as the boards were removed during the summer months. He noted that the City of Minneapolis is able to remove their boards. He added that when he was growing up they played soccer, t -ball, etc., in open spaces and fields. Therefore, he is in favor of a hockey rink if the boards were removed during the summer months. Kathleen Carter, 4500 Vandervork Ave., indicated that she grew up in Edina and lives directly across from the park, which at that time.was called Division Park. She noted that there are a lot more things at the park now compared to when she was growing up. Now there is a walking path, tennis courts, new warming house, basketball court, softball field and skating rink. Ms. Carter stated that living across the street from the park she is concerned that if the boards are left up all year it would really take away what little green space there is in the park. She added that it will also cause additional traffic and at some point it's going to require a parking lot. She stated that this may not be an issue for the Park Board but it's going to become an issue for someone's committee because of the Park Board's actions. She stated that she would be against the permanent hockey facility based on the limited acreage of the park. Tim Meehan, 5229 Hollywood, noted that when the Park Board was talking about Lewis Park and Countryside Park he heard things like feasibility study and bringing in an j architect to do a complete study so that they do it right. However, when you talk about Todd Park it's lets just slap it in and see what happens. He indicated that no disrespect to the Park Superintendent but he's around the park every day and right now there is standing water all over the park. There are ducks and geese swimming in the 7 acres of green space that has been talked about. Mr. Meehan commented,that just because they are opposed to having the rink doesn't mean they are against family use of the park. He noted that what they are talking about is the best use of the park and he has now heard a couple of people say that having a hockey rink, doesn't make sense for the best use of the park. If they want the park to be for the youth then there needs to be some open space. He pointed out that Todd Park is the smallest park with this many facilities in Edina. He noted that area where the potential hockey rink is proposed would be abutted directly on all four sides by housing to which there is no other park like this within the city. Mr. Meehan indicated that if the Park Board is going_ to pursue this he thinks what they are really doing is perpetuating poor management of the park system. He noted that mistakes have been made at Countryside Park and they don't want the same thing to happen at Todd Park because it really is an eyesore. Mr. Meehan stated that he thinks the Park Board should step back and spend more time on this. He noted that he appreciates that they are asking for the community's input because he thinks there are a lot of people here who have years and years of experience that are on both sides of the equation. Therefore, he feels more discussion needs to take place on this issue. Mr. Meehan stressed to the Park Board'that they are not a sports facility board and that there is a benefit to having 8 green space in a park that does add value to the community. Not every little space needs to be developed. Mr. Cronin asked how much money has been invested in the Todd Park warming house to which Mr. Keprios replied that he doesn't have a specific amount because the four new shelter buildings were built with one contract. However, he would say to build Todd Park it cost approximately $200,000 and $250,000. Mr. Cronin stated that he thinks it's an absolutely beautiful building and for some people having a hockey rink is an eyesore but for others having a rink is a thing of beauty. He pointed out that he would like to contradict a little bit on what Mr. Meehan stated earlier in that he thinks it would be poor management of the park system to develop Todd Park. He stated that he thinks it's almost the opposite in that if the city has invested all of this capital into a structure and they are asking to invest just a tiny bit more to make it functional all year he feels it would be poor management not to build the rink. Al Carlson, 4424 Vandervork Avenue, indicated that the neighborhood received a letter before the winter season basically saying that the building was going to be open a limited number of hours because of budget constraints. The letter asked for input from the residents on what evenings and time periods they would like to see the building open. The letter did not say anything about low usage at the park. He commented that if the city can afford to man a warming house seven days a week then they could probably afford to man it now seven days a week to which it would be used a lot more then it presently is. Katie Meehan, 5229 Hollywood Road, indicated that she is very proud of the Todd Park community and noted that several years ago the neighborhood started "Street Greets" which is where they invite the community and have bands, food, games, prizes, etc., it is very family /youth oriented. She noted that each event has been attended by at least 60 people. She pointed out that the park is surrounded by a lot of houses and they watch out for each other and watch over all of the kids. She commented that they have also engaged the seniors who live at the Brookside apartment building because they recognize that it's important for seniors to interact with youth and families and that's of value. Ms. Meehan noted that they also united to remove buckthorn. She stressed that the Todd Park neighborhood is very community oriented and she doesn't like being cast the "not in my backyard" and that they're not for the youth and they don't want this. She explained that she is all in favor of hockey; she's not in favor of permanent boards. She would like to see them taken down in the summer so they are not poorly maintained. Mr. Cockriel pointed out that you typically don't see the smaller communities putting up and taking down hockey boards. He noted that he believes that St. Paul and some areas of Minneapolis and Hopkins still use portable hockey boards. He explained that the issue with portable boards is of course it costs taxpayer dollars to put them up and take them each year as well as there is the storage issue. In addition there's a safety issue because after the first year the portable boards are never the same because they become uneven and warped. Because the ground moves the board section that is put up one year doesn't necessarily fit on that same section of ground the next year. Lastly, because they are 0 moved so much they end up with a shelf life that is less than typical hockey boards. Mr. Cockriel commented that people from all over the United States ask for the blueprints of Edina's hockey boards. He indicated that the reason is because they stay true. The ground moves but the boards move with it in a serpentine manner and not an uneven manner like some of the boards you will see in Minneapolis and St. Paul. He stated that it makes no difference; however, he sees it as a waste of manpower and maintenance to put them up and take them down each year. Mr. Klus asked Mr. Cockriel to talk about the maintenance program of the boards to which Mr. Cockriel replied that they typically try to replace the boards every ten years. He pointed out that they don't paint them anymore because that was an issue with the puck marks. He noted that all of the newer rinks are left the green treated look, which is natural to the setting. Mr. Cockriel stated that he doesn't doubt that there's an occasion when the weeds grow up around the insides of boards because of standing water which is evident in most hockey rinks, however, he's not going to force his staff to put on chest waders and weed whip around them. Mr. Cockriel commented that they do have three rinks that have solid bases and noted that all three of them do get some summer use. Mr. Fronek indicated that from what he gathers there seems to be a limited number of ice skating rinks but there also seems to be a limited amount of green space in the parks. He asked Mr. Keprios to speak a little bit about how to balance that as well as how he came up with his recommendation. Mr. Keprios replied that how this all got started was through the Edina Hockey Association's input and concern over reducing the total number of outdoor hockey rinks. Mr. Keprios indicated that based on a lot of input from the community, to which he applauds the Park Board for listening to the community, he noted that it would be nice if they could come to some kind of a conclusion where they could put another outdoor hockey rink in the system so that they don't have a net loss compared to what they had for the 2004 -2005 season. Mr. Keprios stated that he thinks if they allow EHA to review the Request For Proposals responses that were received and let them iron out whether or not they want to move forward with it. Hopefully by the September Park Board meeting staff will have a recommendation of where to go. Mr. Keprios explained that there is still the option of putting in a second hockey rink at Lewis Park without going the full nine yards and spending thousands of dollars to build an artificial rink not knowing where the money is going to come from. Therefore, his recommendation is to wait until the feasibility study is completed and EHA makes a decision on which direction they want to go. At that time he thinks the Park Board should address the issue of where an outdoor rink should go. Mr. Keprios stressed again that staff's recommendation is to not put a hockey rink back in at Countryside Park in the wrong orientation. He commented that he would like to find the funding to establish a master plan for Countryside Park regardless of what is decided regarding outdoor hockey rinks. Mr. Keprios explained that Edina is short green space and we are a fully developed and landlocked community. He noted that by listening to the Todd Park neighborhood he thinks by not putting in a rink it would give them the opportunity to upgrade that space and put some dollars into beautifying the neighborhood so it's even greener and better for 10 a multiple of sports during the warm weather months. He commented that from what It he's heard the neighborhood thinks this would be a fairly good compromise. However, they would probably end up with more scheduled events during the summer but at least they wouldn't have to look at the hockey boards during the warm weather months. Mr. Keprios stressed that he doesn't think the Park Board should make a decision on where to put a rink until EHA has had a chance to review the proposals and find out what the results of the feasibility study are. Mr. Sorem indicated that he's confused because there seems to be a contradiction because if the area is below the water table and there is standing water he would be concerned about the grass quality for sports. It's already been stated that the quality of ice would be fine. He commented that he doesn't know what the cost would be to renovate that type of field to make it a good field like Lewis Park. Everyone wants green space but it doesn't appear to be great green space. Mr. Keprios responded that is a fair comment. He noted that they might just have to put significant dollars into Todd Park as we have done at Lewis Park and Braemar Park athletic fields if that's the direction the Park Board wants to go. He stated that to do it right so it drains off immediately after rain they are looking at some significant dollars we would also need the watershed district's blessing to alter the grade. Mr. Keprios pointed out that he thinks they can at least slightly improve the area if they were to take out the ice rink. Ms. Presthus asked whether or not they would put in a hard surface area so that it would be useable during the summer for rollerblading, roller hockey, etc. or would it be left green grass. Mr. Keprios replied that the plan all along has been to just have grass. Mr. Sorem asked if a hard surface could be put in after the fact to which Mr. Cockriel replied that as long as they get grade right before they put up the boards there should be no problem. Mr. O'Connell indicated that he has been very persuaded by tonight's testimony and thinks what he heard Mr. Keprios say is he would like to delay this vote and wait until EHA has had a chance to look at the proposals. He stated that the Todd Park neighborhood has a rink that is very close to them and it's a long way from Todd Park to Lewis Park and they are talking about a lot of small children in the neighborhood. He noted that the population is also increasing with young people who will be using the park. Mr. Keprios commented that he thinks it's worthy to mention the reason why this was proposed. It is not because the neighborhood came to the Park Board requesting this park amenity, it's because EHA came to them and said they don't want a net loss of one outdoor hockey rink. He noted that at that time staff came up with various options to which Lewis Park was his first recommendation based on input from the EHA. However, the Park Board chose not to go there and wanted to go to Todd Park instead because the thought was that it would be more difficult for the non - residents to find. Mr. O'Connell indicated that he would strongly be in favor of having a roof covered situation at Lewis Park to relieve some the pressure on Braemar rather than build a fourth sheet of ice. He stressed that with refrigerated ice on a permanent and covered surface is going to have a much longer life as far as the season goes. 11 Mr. Johnson commented that he agrees with Mr. O'Connell in that he also was under the impression that Lewis and Todd Park are two separate issues. He noted that his understanding is that Lewis Park would be done in place of a fourth sheet of ice at Braemar. However, the Todd Park rink is to replace the rink at Countryside Park so there would not be a net loss to EHA's program. Therefore, he's not sure why EHA's request for proposal time frame has anything to do with this. Mr. Keprios explained that the reason why it would play a role is because if EHA decides after their deliberations that this is something that would not be doable they could still put in an outdoor hockey rink without refrigeration. Mr. Johnson stated that he thinks if they do put in a second rink at Lewis Park they should also put one in at Todd Park because they probably could use two more outdoor rinks because of the lack of ice time that's available for the kids in this community. Mr. Johnson indicated that in regards to green space issues if they place a new field at Todd Park it would still increase traffic five to six months out of the year where with a hockey rink it would be approximately two months out of the year. Mr. Johnson stressed that the parking issue would definitely then come into play. He commented that one of the big issues of the neighborhood was traffic and parking problems. He stated that his main concern is to either move the rink to Todd Park or put it back at Countryside Park. Mr. Sorem stated that he's a little confused because it seems that some of the people who were at last month's meeting who were against the rink are now not so much against the rink but are against permanent hockey boards. Therefore he thinks they just need to discuss removable boards versus permanent boards. Mr. Sorem pointed out that the numbers in the youth hockey program are just staggering as well as he will attest that he has had a difficult time finding an open hockey rink on Saturdays and Sundays. Therefore, maybe they need to look at putting in additional rinks because right now they are talking about trying to find a place where they can replace the Countryside rink, which is a must in his mind. Mr. Sorem commented that he understands and appreciates all of the concerns for and against the hockey rink at Todd Park. However, their job is to look at the needs of the community as a whole and Todd Park is a community-based park. He noted that it just makes too much sense to him to replace the rink at Countryside Park to Todd Park. Edina's park maintenance staff is by far the best in the state if not the Country. Jeff Sorem MOVED TO BUILD A PERMANENT STRUCTURE RINK AT TODD PARK. Ray O'Connell SECONDED. Ms. Presthus indicated that they have not discussed the parking issue to which she has some pretty strong concerns about kids darting between cars and not providing proper parking. She asked since the neighborhood seems negative about having asphalt parking surface have they ever considered using pavers for a .parking surface instead of putting in asphalt. Mr. Keprios replied that he doesn't believe the city has any paver style parking lots in the park system. Mr. Cockriel stated that they do have what they call a GEO grid road surface at the Sherwood pump house at Sherwood Park and one also over at 12 Browndale Park. However, the disadvantage of that is if the soil conditions underneath 16 cannot handle that kind of traffic you end up with the pavers shifting and coming up and actually being torn up. In addition when they are plowed during the wintertime it exposes that grass to the hard frost to which you almost have to start over again every spring as far as the grass goes. Mr. Keprios stated that he personally doesn't support that approach for a parking lot. If the park needs a parking lot, it should be an asphalt parking lot. Mr. Klus commented that his thought on this motion is he's in favor of an ice rink at Todd Park, however, he's not so sure that a decision needs to be made tonight. He noted that they could put this off until August after they've received a little bit more feedback. He indicated that he thinks that would still give them enough time to make a decision and still be able to put up a rink if they agree to do it at Todd Park. Mr. Keprios asked Mr. Cockriel how much time his staff would need to build a hockey rink to which Mr. Cockriel replied if a decision were made by the middle of August they would still be okay. Mr. Johnson stated that he would disagree because there have already been two meetings with open discussion and they have already heard from everyone who has an opinion. If they table it for another month he really doesn't know that it would make that much of a difference. Mr. Sorem commented that he would assume that a little pleasure rink would go along with it to which Mr. Cockriel replied that is correct. Mr. Keprios added that it would also require the installation of some new lighting. Is IN FAVOR: Jeff Johnson, Karla Sitek, Todd Fronek, Linda Presthus, Jessica Selleck, Jeff Sorem, Ray O'Connell S AGAINST: George Klus Mr. Keprios stated that this will be on the August 2 "d City Council agenda. He also indicated that the Park Board minutes are published on the website after they've been approved. However, he will make an exception this time and publish the unapproved Park Board minutes. IV. WATER QUALITY PRESENTATION — CONSERVATION LEAGUE OF EDINA Jan Goldman- Carter, 4504 Casco Avenue, a member of the Conservation League of Edina, gave the Park Board a power point presentation. She indicated that they are working in a partnership with the Edina Community Foundation, the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Mr. Klus stated that the Park Board appreciates all of their work and what they are doing within the city. 13 V. OTHER A. Arneson.Acres - Mr. Keprios indicated that during the construction project that is currently going on at Arneson Acres they have learned that the feed line that serves the fire suppression system at Arneson Acres is undersized and always has been. He noted that, if they were to have a fire, it probably would not have the pressure needed to save the building. Therefore, the fire marshal has asked since it is already under construction would it be possible to pipe in the proper line. Mr. Keprios asked Mr. Cockriel how much it would cost to do that to which Mr.. Cockriel replied he would guess approximately $15,000. Mr. Keprios asked if he could get the Park Board's blessing to utilize the Developer's Fund. He noted currently there is approximately $90,000 in the Developer's Fund. Mr. Keprios explained that before any action is taken there is another item that is coming their way. He stated that they have received a formal complaint from the attorney's office regarding proper ADA accessible parking and access to the Edina Aquatic Center. What is currently in place may not be ADA compliant. Therefore, they are working very closely and positively with them. Mr. Keprios noted that they have come up with a plan that would be a great fix without significantly altering the character of the park. They would basically create a small parking lot just off of 66 Street immediately to the south entrance of the bathhouse. However, the price tag is going to be significantly larger than $15,000 it will probably be closer to $40,000. Mr. Keprios noted that he wanted to the give the Park Board a heads up. Mr. Keprios stated what he is asking for tonight is the Park Board's blessing to approve approximately $15,000 to $20,000 out of the Developer's Fund to take care of the problem at Arneson Acres. Mr. Cockriel stressed that timing is of the essence with this project because they have to do it while 70`h Street is torn up. If they go in and do it later it's going to be more expensive. Ray O'Connell MOVED TO APPROVE USE OF THE DEVELOPER'S FUND TO PAY FOR THE PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF THE PROPER WATER SERVICE LINE TO ARNESON ACRES PARK. Karla Sitek SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNAMIMOUSLY. B. Centennial Lakes Amphitheatre - Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that the dedication of the Maetzold Amphitheatre at Centennial Lakes will be this Sunday at 7:00 pm followed by the Sousa Band Concert. Mr. Keprios commented that for Mayor Maetzold has long, been a strong supporter of parks and recreation and he encourages everyone to attend this, special event in his honor. C. Future Agenda Items — Mr. Fronek asked to have the Countryside Park master plan put on the agenda for the Park Board to start to discuss. D. Mr. O'Connell commented that when he attended an interesting meeting on May 14th with the Conservation League that did a bird study along with Wood Lake Nature Center staff and Bob Atol. He stated that Braemar Golf Course is now certified by the Audubon 14 Society for meeting the 7 main criteria established by the Audubon Society. Mr. 41 O'Connell also stated that Braemar Golf Course contributes to good water quality because of the things they've implemented since about 1997. VI. ADJOURNMENT J Linda Presthus MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 9:00 P.M. Jeff Sorem SECONDED THE MOTION. MEETING ADJOURNED. 15 SPECIAL EDINA PARK BOARD MEETING 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS EDINA CITY HALL JULY 26, 2005 MEMBERS PRESENT: George Klus, Jeff Johnson, Linda Presthus, Jeff Sorem, Karla Sitek, Ray O'Connell, Mike Dammon, Mike Weiss MEMBERS ABSENT: Todd Fronek, Andy Finsness, Jessica Selleck STAFF PRESENT: John Keprios, Ed MacHolda, Janet Canton, Vince Cockriel OTHERS PRESENT: Neal Campion, Jeff Simondet, Jane Lofstrom, Celeste Franson, Helen Strickland, Eva Johnson, Julie Risser, Debbi Swanstrom, Tim Meehan, Doug Hall, Tim Skwarek, Kathleen Carter, Nancy Hall, John Purdum, Michael Wagner, Steve Halgren I. LEWIS PARK HOCKEY RINK AND TODD PARK HOCKEY RINK PROPOSAL Mr. Klus reviewed why a special Park Board meeting is being held. He explained that there has still been a lot of discussion as to what's the best thing to do in this community when it comes to hockey rinks. Mr. Klus commented that they really have not heard from the Edina Hockey Association (EHA) in the last couple of months on this issue. He pointed out that since the last Park Board meeting Mr. Keprios has met with EHA and asked for their thoughts and feelings regarding the outdoor hockey rinks in Edina. Mr. Klus stated that there are several things that they could do as a Park Board tonight. First, they can leave their motion as it is and not do anything. Second, they could go back and look at some other options and change the motion. Mr. Klus stressed that he wants to make sure that if they are going to lose a rink at Countryside Park that there will still be enough rinks in the community for people who want to skate. He noted that the bottom line of what they are going to do tonight is make sure that they don't lose a sheet of ice by passing a motion. The motion made last month makes sure that there are going to be the same number of ice rinks this coming season. He indicated that they want to at least maintain what they have and somewhere down the road have a long range plan for additional rinks. Mr. Klus indicated that in terms of Todd Park if they elect tonight to change their motion then they need to look at what they want to do with Todd Park. He noted that Todd Park is still a community park and needs to have more use whether it's a hockey rink or a multi - purpose field because they are short in terms of useable space for their associations. Mr. Klus indicated that he would like to hear from the EHA on what their thoughts are in terms of ice sheets and what their needs are as they look at this winter. He noted that at the moment he doesn't think they can look beyond this winter. He stated that they have heard the pros and cons from the Todd Park people and is glad that they have a great concern for the park. He noted that if there is any new conversation from the neighborhood he would like to hear from them, however, he does not want to rehash old conversations. Mike Wagner stated that he is the President of the Edina Hockey Association and lives at 4506 Wooddale Avenue. Mr. Wagner apologized if there have been any misunderstandings from EHA. He noted that there are 1,200 plus skaters in their program and it continues. to grow which is the good news, however, the bad news is they are in an ice crunch with both indoor and outdoor hockey rinks. He indicated that a big concern for them right now is they can't afford to lose any of their outdoor hockey rinks. He pointed out that with the boards being taken out of Countryside Park they need to find a place to put new boards and stated it is immaterial to them as an association where new boards are put up. Their main concern is they don't want to lose any ice. Mr. O'Connell asked Mr. Wagner if they put in a shiny rink what age group of hockey would that primarily satisfy to which Mr. Wagner replied that what they really need is a hockey rink with boards. They basically need a replacement of what was at Countryside Park only with new boards. Mr. Keprios added that shiny rinks are not scheduled rinks. Mr. Klus asked Mr. Wagner what is the number one age group where ice time is needed. Mr. Wagner replied it would be for, their Mite program which is basically 1", 2 °d and 3`d graders because right now the Mite program is the fastest growing program. Mr. Keprios explained that the reason for the special Park Board meeting is to make sure that the recommendation that the Park Board is forwarding onto the City Council is one that is based on fact and to ensure that the Park Board makes a well informed decision. He stated that he wants to make sure that the Park Board is aware of all of the facts behind the recommendation that was made. Mr. Keprios indicated that he recently met with Mr. Wagner and Mr. Halgren from EHA as well as with one of the vendors who responded to their request for proposal. He commented that the whole reason for not having a net loss in hockey was to be sensitive to the needs of EHA. He noted that he asked Mr. Wagner and Mr. Helgren what their preference would be if they could make the decision to which they stated they would prefer it be at Lewis Park as opposed to Todd Park. He pointed out that the main reason for why they would prefer Lewis Park is because they are studying the feasibility of having an ice resurfacing machine and having a second rink at Lewis Park they could resurface two rinks as well as consolidate some of the maintenance. Mr. Keprios stated that to take another step he thinks their greater preference would be to have an outdoor rink at Braemar that would be maintained by an ice- resurfacer., He explained that would alleviate a lot of the expenses that would be necessary to do what the concept calls for at Lewis Park., He noted that it could work at Braemar; however, it could also create a parking problem but is something that maybe they should look into further. Mr. Keprios stressed that he thinks the Park Board needs to hear this because what he thought he heard at the previous Park Board meeting'is that all EHA is concerned about is having a lot more outdoor rinks and he doesn't believe that's the case. He stated that EHA would prefer quality ice that they can count on over 2 quantity. He commented that he thinks if they could guarantee quality ice at all of the rinks they have in place now EHA would be very happy. Mr. Keprios pointed out that he thinks they are leaning towards the same goal. He wants to make sure that they are all on the same page and that the Park Board makes their decision on the input that has been brought forward and that is what has brought them to the table. Mr. O'Connell stated that he has listened to all of the discussions on Todd Park both pro and con and his consensus and thoughts are that the opponents of the hockey rink per se have softened their opposition to which their main opposition is having permanent boards placed at Todd Park. He commented that he thought the proponents at the second meeting made a wonderful presentation and completely justified their need for a hockey rink at Todd Park. Therefore, the feeling he received after hearing both sides is that the neighborhood would be pleased to have a good skating surface plus a hockey rink. Mr. O'Connell indicated that beyond that he has read and listened to discussions about Lewis Park and a covered arena to which he would be very, very interested in that. He stated that with the Braemar situation he feels that if they were to add another rink there it would cause a parking situation. Mr. O'Connell pointed out that in general he is interested in seeing if they could at least give some kind of accommodation to the people at Todd Park. Mr. Klus pointed out to the Park Board that they need to remember that they have limited dollars this year so they are just looking at one rink. The planning for other rinks will come later this fall as they look at the long range planning with what they are going to do with the parks. Mr. Keprios stated that for clarification he thinks it's fair to say that after he met with Mr. Wagner, Mr. Halgren and the vendor the decision was made that it's not feasible to consider building any kind of a roof structure or artificial refrigeration this year. He noted that he feels the direction they are heading is they need to rely on Mother Nature to provide the cold weather and then see what kind of ice they can get by using a Zamboni. Mr. O'Connell commented long range they need to be very careful in looking at artificial refrigeration in that they need to be careful of who the providers are and what their experiences have been and take advantage of the technology that exists today. Mr. Sorem commented that after playing hockey in Edina as a kid and during high school as well as having coached, he is of the opinion that there needs to be more than 11 hockey rinks in Edina. Therefore, he feels the long range planning should include looking at putting in rinks with refrigeration at both Lewis Park and at Braemar. In addition they also need to look at reconfiguring Countryside Park in order to put in a hockey rink in the correct orientation. Mr. Sorem stated that he thinks these issues do need to be discussed this fall. He noted that he would like to see them expand to 12 or 13 rinks, however, it's almost August and they need to get a rink in for next year. Therefore, having looked at that as well as their options and the money that they have he feels that Todd Park is the best option because there is already a warming house and they know good ice can be made. In addition there really isn't a neighborhood rink in that 3 area for kids to walk to and feels this option makes the most sense. Mr. Sorem pointed out that he thinks the motion should stay. Mr. Damman asked is there efficient room at Lewis Park to put up a hockey rink this year without refrigeration. Mr. Klus replied that it could be put up without refrigeration, however, it sounds like it would be hard to do from staffs point of view to have a Zamboni there. Mr. Damman commented that maybe they could look at renting space from Gabbert's warehouse that's across the street to house a Zamboni. Mr. Damman stated that he would be for putting in a second rink at Lewis Park as well as putting in a pleasure rink and shiny rink at both at both Todd Park and Countryside Park. Mr. Damman indicated that he thinks they need to go with what the needs are for EHA and that is what he would like to see happen. Mr. Weiss indicated that he lives near Lewis Park and knows of its use as a multi - purpose field and has driven by there many times at night when the fields are full and commented that the parking there is adequate. He noted that there is some overflow but it doesn't seem to hamper traffic anywhere around the area. He commented that he thinks if they can put two sheets at Lewis Park it will enhance hockey because people would be able to cross from one rink to the other and there could be multiple games at a single location. He indicated that this seems to make sense to him particularly because he doesn't think it will impact the Lewis Park neighborhood as much as it would Todd Park. Mr. Weiss also pointed out that he agrees that Todd Park and Countryside Park should have a pleasure rink. However, if they are going to put in a rink and go long -term then Lewis Park is definitely a better venue than the other options. Ms. Presthus stated that in the memo she read it was proposing that the hockey rink be placed at Lewis Park be that is what EHA preferred, however, after just listening to Mr. Wagner speak it sounds like all EHA is asking for is that they not lose a hockey rink. She noted that it was first proposed to be at Lewis Park because there could be a Zamboni which would mean better ice,,however, now it is being implied that there will be no Zamboni and therefore it wouldn't necessarily have better ice. Mr. Klus commented that he doesn't think they are saying no Zamboni they are saying that it may be difficult with the construction of the current warming house and that there would need to be some major renovation done in order to house the Zamboni. Mr. Keprios explained that EHA is willing to authorize him to hire Dell Erickson to study the feasibility of putting in a Zamboni and to be sure that first it's possible and secondly what are the expenses and what's involved. He pointed out that the city doesn't have the money for this but if EHA could come up with the funding then it may potentially be feasible for it to happen this season. Ms. Presthus commented with that said she has nothing against Lewis Park, it's her neighborhood and she is very familiar with the traffic there and how it's used. However, the neighborhood has not yet been contacted and if a decision is made to place a rink at Lewis Park there are a lot of houses and condominiums in that area. Therefore, she thinks that the neighborhood needs 'to be contacted before they can make a final decision if they are adding more facilities to Lewis Park. She noted that out of courtesy the neighborhood should be contacted. Ms. Presthus pointed out that there are some very 4 good benefits of going to Todd Park and she has listened to the neighbors both for and against so at this time she is still thinking. Ms. Sitek asked if there are currently lights at Todd Park to which Mr. Keprios replied that if a hockey rink were put in at Todd Park they would need to put in lighting. He added that if a hockey rink were put in at Lewis Park they would also have to put in additional lighting. Ms. Sitek commented that at Lewis Park if another rink were put there she doesn't think the warming house could handle 4 teams plus the regular skaters. Mr. Keprios replied there's no question that it would be more crowded than it is now but feels that it is doable. At one time they had bandy, hockey and general skating going on at the same time. Ms. Sitek stated that she knows there used to be a hockey rink at Todd Park and as a kid she used it and does feel it is a good place for a hockey rink, however, having another hockey rink at Lewis Park would also be good. Ms. Sitek commented that if she knew they could for sure get a Zamboni at Lewis Park she would want that but since that is not for sure she hasn't decided. Mr. Johnson asked approximately how long would it take for the study to be complete on what would have to be done to the warming house to which Mr. Keprios replied maybe two weeks to figure out if it's going to work or not. Mr. Johnson stated that basically they don't know what it would cost, it could be $5,000 or it could be $75,000. Mr. Keprios pointed out that it's going to be an expensive proposition if they are talking about concrete slabs, water heaters, building structure, etc. Mr. Johnson indicated that he thinks it's a great idea but his only concern is staffing because if a high school kid is running the warming house and Zamboni there's a concern of being able to keep people off the ice if it's reserved for the association only. He noted that he also is in favor of having 12 or 13 hockey rinks. He commented that he was under the impression that Lewis Park and Todd Park are two separate issues. Mr. Johnson stated that he has heard the pros and cons and is still in favor of sending the Park Board's recommendation on to the City Council to see what they want to do with it because the Park Board has made their decision. He pointed out that he is in favor of doing both Lewis and Todd so if they flipped a coin and did Lewis this year with the understanding that they would look at Todd Park in the next year or two that could also be a possibility. Mr. Johnson stressed that he also thinks if they do not put in a hockey rink at Todd Park then there is no question that the green space would need to be made into a multi- purpose field. Mr. Klus indicated that one of the things they've heard from EHA is that it would be nice to have an ice resurfacer which there is an option. He noted that they could put in a smaller rink at Braemar which would handle the smaller kids because with that option there already is an ice resurfacer sitting in the building as well as there is staff on hand. However, the down side to that is there might be a hassle with losing some of the parking. Ms. Sitek asked why it would need to be a smaller rink to which Mr. Klus replied because there is not enough room to put in a 200 ft. hockey rink. Mr. Johnson pointed out that if they put a second sheet at Lewis Park then two rinks could be resurfaced rather than just one at Braemar. Mr. Klus asked Mr. Johnson if they cannot get an ice resurfacer at Lewis Park this winter would that be an issue. Mr. Johnson replied that he does see it as an issue. However, if it's a one year issue with the 5 understanding that it will be done in a matter of two years as well as the warming house would be redone and able to house the ice resurfacer and artificial ice would be looked into, then it would be a great idea. Mr. Johnson stated that he wouldn't mind putting in a rink a Braemar but he would rather see it at Lewis. He does have a concern taking away parking at Braemar. Ms. Presthus indicated that it has been brought up in the past that a lot of non - residents use Lewis Park because it is on the border on Bloomington and is very accessible and very open. Therefore one of the benefits of having the rink at Todd Park is that really is an Edina rink and is scheduled by Edina people. She added that she's not saying that this is a positive or a negative but it was an idea that was mentioned in the past. Mr. Sorem stated that he really hasn't had enough time to think about the Braemar concept but feels that maybe as a long -range plan a rink could be placed there with an ice resurfacer. He noted that his question is where they would get dressed to which Mr. Keprios replied that they could probably get a warming house up and running for approximately $2,000. He explained that there are pre -fab buildings where they can put in portable heaters. Mr. Sorem commented that another option they may want to consider at Braemar is investing in some portable boards to experiment with. He pointed out what is the real value of maintaining a rink with an ice resurfacer without artificial refrigeration because how much value would they really get. He indicated are they really willing to risk those kinds of dollars to build a housing facility for an ice resurfacer at Lewis Park only to find out what really did it gain them. It's still going to snow and they still don't have a rink. He noted that his thought process is maybe they should put in portable boards at Braemar and experiment with the ice - resurfacer approach and if it doesn't work they can always put the portable boards at a different rink. This way they can find out how well it would work in our climate without artificial refrigeration. He commented that he thinks they can get the building in place for a couple of thousand dollars and invest in some portable lighting for the season. Mr. Sorem indicated that it would be a lot of money that they would need to put into Lewis Park to experiment with and see if the concept works without artificial refrigeration. Ms. Presthus commented that she likes the concept of experimenting, however, if the goal is to not lose an ice rink with that concept they literally would be losing one because it is only a smaller rink, not regulation size. Mr. Klus asked for feedback from the EHA. Mr. Wagner indicated that although it's not perfect, a small rink at Braemar would have some benefits and would be able to accommodate their Mite program. Mr. Klus asked Mr. Wagner if they put in the ice rink at Braemar, because it is smaller, would this be enough so you would feel like you haven't lost anything over last winter. Mr. Wagner replied that he thinks that would be sufficient. Steve Halgren, EHA Vice- President of Operations, explained that there are 28 Mite teams skating at all of the rinks two nights a week from late December through early February. Therefore, if 28 teams skated two nights a week scattered amongst all of the other rinks that the city is providing by putting in a smaller rink over at Braemar it would meet their accommodations. Mr. Halgren noted that the Mites play full games on a regular sheet of ice at one of the eleven outdoor rinks around the city and by putting them 2 at Braemar it would easily accommodate them. He added that in addition they often times are out in the market place buying indoor ice. Having a smaller rink would certainly meet their needs for the forthcoming year. Mr. Sorem commented that in his opinion that's pretty small for Mites to be playing on, however, they could do it but feels that the rink would be too small for anyone above Mites. Mr. Johnson suggested that maybe they could experiment with part of the parking lot by roping off an area, maybe 10' by 10' flood it and use the Zamboni on it and every once in awhile have people skate on it. This could be a test spot to see if it works before they go through the expense and then finding out it doesn't work. Mr. Keprios replied that certainly is one approach that they could try. Pat Cronin, 11 Cooper Avenue, indicated that he thinks it's great that the Park Board is supporting the Edina Hockey Association but that is only part of the equation. He stated that he has two small children who love to skate and during the last five years there has been an influx of young families in the area. He pointed out that there used to be skating rinks at both Todd Park and Garden Park which have been eliminated, therefore, this is the sparsest area in Edina when it comes to having a hockey rink. Mr. Cronin commented when you factor in EHA' needs, to which he is a huge proponent, you need to understand that the grass roots of Edina hockey is the neighborhood rinks. He noted that's where the Mite teams are stationed and that's the beauty of the whole program. Mr. Cronin asked if another rink is put out at Braemar is that going to have to be the home rink for the people of Todd Park and asked the Park Board to review both of the issues very carefully. He also noted that his office is on Cahill Road right across the street from Lewis Park and every Monday through Friday from approximately 3:00 pm to 5:00 pm there are anywhere from 20 to 30 guys who are non - residents who have a standing game. He stated that by 5:00 pm the ice is all chewed up and unplayable. Mr. Johnson stated that is a great point in that if a second sheet is placed at Lewis Park it would probably need to be policed extremely carefully. Mr. Cronin noted that he hopes the Park Board will stay with Todd Park and look at Lewis and Braemar as alternatives to add in the future. He added that the plans for Lewis and Braemar would be very expensive options. Eva Johnson, 4380 Brookside Court, indicated that she has been a resident of Edina since 1952 and she is very familiar with Todd Park and noted that a lot of people from St. Louis Park do use Todd Park. There seems to often be standing water during the summer months in the area of the proposed hockey rink. There is a big drain in the middle of the field that drains into the woods; however, it doesn't seem to help at all. Lewis Park has three soccer fields but Todd Park has none. Todd Park does not even have a football field. They have a warming house that they really didn't ask for, but it's there. Very few people skate in the winter but the warming house is used during the summer. She agrees with the man from Hilldale there are young people coming in and it's so much fun to see the young people and the mothers drive there she doesn't know where they are coming from but they drive instead of walking to the park. There's a nice play area now in the field that you want to put the hockey rink in which will never allow for quality ice for skating because of an underground spring. Ms. Johnson asked to not place a hockey rink 7 in the field area because in the summertime there will be no green space left for the children to play. Mr. Klus stated that he would like to make one point of clarification for the people who live around Todd Park. He explained that he was not part of the bond issue that passed in Edina in 1996; however, there was a neighborhood group of people from the Todd Park area who spent a lot of time designing Todd Park's warming house. Therefore, it was something that the neighborhood was very involved with so when he hears that the neighborhood didn't ask for it that's incorrect because the neighborhood did ask for it. Mr. Klus indicated that he thinks it's unfair to the Park and Recreation Department to constantly hear that because they did work with the neighbors when it came to the bond proposal. Neal Campion, 4436 Vandervork, indicated that he doesn't think flooding a small area at Braemar as an experiment would work too well because in a previous meeting it was his understanding that quality ice cannot be produced if there are no boards to contain the water. Mr. Campion commented that when this whole process started it was his understanding that EHA primarily asked for no net loss of hockey surfaces because they were losing the hockey rink at Countryside Park and therefore an additional sheet of ice was needed. He indicated that he thinks putting up portable boards at Braemar where there is a Zamboni is doable. In addition, if two rinks were placed at Lewis Park that would mean only one place for the grounds people to flood which to him seems very efficient. Mr. Campion stated that there are communities that use a Zamboni on outside rinks and his recollection is that they work very nicely and have good quality ice. Therefore, it seems clearly to him that either Lewis Park and/or Braemar would make a whole lot more sense. Mr. Campion pointed out that Todd Park is considerably smaller than what people have discussed and what he is finding is if it's under six acres of green space and they already have a softball field, basketball court, warming house and tennis courts that does not leave a whole lot of extra room if a hockey rink is put in along with a pleasure rink. They would basically have zero left over as far as unused green space. Mr. Campion commented that lastly if you look at the distanced between Todd Park to St. Louis Park versus Lewis Park to Bloomington it's a horse a piece as far as proximity. He noted that he thinks if he understood correctly that you really don't want to try to prevent other people from coming and using these facilities. It was voiced before that as far as people from St. Louis Park and Minneapolis coming over to use Todd Park it was pretty much suggested that was kind of elitist on their part the fact that people from Bloomington use Lewis Park so be it that's kind of the way hockey is. Mr. Klus pointed out that when it comes to ice time they may have to look at having more scheduled parks. He noted that having scheduled parks does allow the city to charge outside groups to use them. Mr. Klus explained that the Park Board does have a "Priority Use of Edina's Scheduled Outdoor Athletic Facilities and Recommended Guidelines" where city programs do get first choice. Mr. O'Connell asked Mr. Cockriel for his opinion on putting in a hockey rink at Todd Park, does he think it can work to which Mr. Cockriel replied yes, it would work. 8 Ms. Presthus asked if she understands correctly there is not enough money to put in an outdoor regular full size rink either at Lewis Park or Todd Park in addition to experimenting with a rink at Braemar to which Mr. Keprios replied that is correct. Mr. Klus pointed out again that they are not looking at adding a net gain of any rinks in the community this winter but rather maintaining the same number of rinks that they had last winter. Ms. Presthus pointed out that if they did an experiment at Braemar that would be a little different in that they would be using Braemar's staff and it would be new boards and it would using their Zamboni as opposed to using the Park Board's staff to maintain it. Mr. Cockriel stressed that he wants to make sure they don't get too far ahead of themselves because there are a lot of options on the table. He explained that from staff s point of view even if they added a rink to Lewis Park if the money were on the table to build a place to house the Zamboni ice- resurfacer there is no way they would be able to get it done this year. He noted that they could add a rink to Lewis Park like the ones they have at Creek Valley, Arden Park, etc. so that is not an issue. However, if they add a rink at Lewis Park and keep both rinks at Todd Park and Countryside Park that would in fact add a maintenance burden to the department because right now they do not have that extra hockey rink at Lewis Park. He explained that adding a hockey rink is not quite the same as adding a pleasure rink because the expectations of a hockey rink and level of maintenance and demands on manpower are much greater. Ms. Presthus commented that they would be removing the hockey rink at Countryside Park to which Mr. Cockriel replied that his understanding is they are still talking about leaving a shiny rink at Countryside Park which would still mean labor. Mr. Klus indicated that Mr. Keprios' proposal is to add a second rink to Lewis Park and still maintain a pleasure rink and shiny at Countryside as well as a pleasure rink at Todd Park. Both of those rinks would be flooded with at least a tanker truck. Mr. Keprios commented that it wouldn't be the best ice but that is all they can do with the staff they have. He pointed out that they are still one full -time maintenance person short since 2003; however, we have added even more parks, facilities and infrastructure to maintain since then. Mr. O'Connell stated that he has heard all of the arguments and has listened to all of the options to which they cannot be proven and have all kinds of question marks. Therefore, he would support the original motion to build a hockey rink at Todd Park because that is a given that it's going to work. Mr. O'Connell commented that he supports doing the additional rinks but it's going to take a lot of time and studying because if they don't they are going to end up putting up something that's not going to work. Mr. Klus indicated that if he's not mistaken they have not made a recommendation with what they are going to do with Countryside Park. Do they want a tanker like Mr. Keprios suggested in his memo to the Park Board or do we leave it as it is with no ice this winter? Mr. Johnson asked right now what they have recommended is to just flood it with a tanker to which Mr. Klus replied that is not in the recommendation. The recommendation as it stands is to build a permanent structure rink at Todd Park. He noted that there was nothing mentioned for Countryside Park and that is Mr. Cockriel's concern because if they flood Countryside Park it will give him a net gain even if it's 6 only flooded with the tanker truck. Mr. Cockriel pointed out that's correct because what he is hearing is the community demands a quality rink at Lewis park and if they put in a second one it's going to take more time and manpower to keep it up and going. Mr. Johnson stated that his question is if they don't put in a second rink at Lewis Park and put in a hockey rink at Todd Park would they still be able to flood Countryside with a tanker. Mr. Cockriel replied that they can do that because basically they are just flip flopping the labor source over at Countryside Park and putting it over at Todd Park. Mr. Klus asked if it was necessary to make a motion to flood Countryside Park with a tanker this coming season. Mr. Keprios asked to leave that decision for staff to make internally. Mr. Klus asked does anyone want to make a motion tonight on anything that they've heard; if not, they have no other business as a Park Board tonight. H. ADJOURNMENT Ray O'Connell MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 8:10 P.M. Jeff Sorem SECONDED THE MOTION. MEETING ADJOURNED. 10 Wayne Houle From: Bruce A. Johnson [BruceAJohnson @mn.rr.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 3:37 PM To: Wayne Houle; Mike Siitari Subject: RE: 50th & France traffic signs; Southdale area pedestrian crossing Gentlemen, Thank You very much for the new pedestrian walkway safety signs on 70th and 71st streets midway between France and York avenues. These signs are appreciated and will greatly contribute to the safety of the citizens who choose to walk to the shopping and recreation areas in the Southdale area, especially with walking being an increasingly attractive option as gas prices continue to rise (I own 2 cars myself, but walk when I can). While out walking early yesterday evening, cars actually stopped for me at the pedestrian crosswalks and let me cross the road. Unbelievable! Thanks again, Bruce Johnson 7614 York Ave. S. Apt 3313 Edina resident since 1987 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Bruce A. Johnson [ mailto:BruceAJohnson @mn.rr.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 1:27 PM To: 'Wayne Houle' Cc: 'Vince Bongaarts (E- mail)'; 'Mike Siitari' Subject: RE: 50th & France traffic signs; Southdale area pedestrian crossing Wayne, I'm still having problems crossing the streets near Southdale /Galleria at the pedestrian crosswalks on 70th and 71st streets, between France and York. 100% of the SUVs and 80% of the cars just won't stop for pedestrians trying to cross at the crosswalks. At each pedestrian crosswalk there is a blinking light, a sign with the pedestrian symbol, and another sign with a big arrow pointing down toward the road. Would it be possible to replace the big -arrow signs with signs that read "Please Stop for Pedestrians ", like other communities do? As for 50th & France and 49th & France, those intersections are still such a mess that I just avoid the whole 50th & France area altogether. Thank You, Bruce Johnson 7614 York Ave. S. Apt. 3313 Edina - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wayne Houle [mailto:WHoule @ci.edina.mn.us] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 2:43 PM To: 'BruceAJohnson @mn.rr.com' Cc: Vince Bongaarts (E- mail); Mike Siitari Bruce: In response to your two questions: 1. France Avenue is under Hennepin County's jurisdiction. However, the City of 1 Page 1 of 1 Wayne Houle From: momchilo vucenich [mvucenich @mn.rr.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 10:42 AM To: Wayne Houle Cc: ksharpe @faegre.com; mjhacket @aol.com; nancy.hopf @jacobstrading.com Subject: Thank you Wayne, As president of the Olde Vernon Homeowners assn., I would like to thank you and your staff for all the help and response to our needs. From our fence project two years ago, to the recent light installation on Vernon, to various other small things, thanks. Please pass along our thanks to the others involved. Also, the city forester, Tom Horwath, has been a great help. 9/6/2005 there seems to be a lack of time, desire and interest in controlling those costs, because they are simply passed through to us." "Municipal costs and fees won't kill a deal," added Maenner, "but if they are unjustifiably high, they really color our perception of a city, and it sets the tone for whether a community is a reasonable partner in the development process." Cities should balance their fees against the great economic and tax benefits that most developments bring to their community, added another. "Too often," said Charles Pfeffer, Jr., Pfeffer Company, "cost /benefit formulas are not part of the equation. In most jurisdictions, it's a matter of their perceived needs —which will only increase." "Municipal costs and fees won't kill a deal, but if they are unjustifiably high... it sets the tone for whether a community is a reasonable partner in the development process." -- Paul Maenner, JMW Development LLC The closer cities align their fees to reflect the direct impact or needs of a specific proposal —a sewer connection, for example —the more justifiable it is in the mind of the developer, and the more they make "economic sense" for the deal. Dennis Zylla, Grubb & Ellis /Northco said developers, "should pay fees based on a true nexus between the project and the services being provided." "In building and grading, through reviews and inspections, you see a direct relationship to the fees," said Kuechle. "We often see no relationship or value in park dedication fees." The consensus among NAIOP members seems to be that the phenomenon of constantly increasing permit and application fees, and unrelated charges like park dedication fees, are likely to become major factors in developers' decisions on where to take a proposed project. Dl_�: C, (YU_: OPN l 2M oD N1CJD�( �4G1C�D0 OCJG O0 V CJEEDO Z A city's cultivation of a more open and inviting attitude toward development, and city staff that are willing to look at proposals with the needs of the developer in mind, are also factors in deciding where to develop. As Pat Mascia, Duke Realty Corporation put it, "Everything else being close to equal, we will always choose the path of least resistance." "If one city is more open than another we are considering, great," said Maenner. "But if not, the fact is that we'll roll up our sleeves and slog through whatever they throw at us." "Even just an expressed willingness to work together can go a long way." — Greg Munson, McGough Development Other developers indicated they do not have the time, money or staff to "slog" through the process. The common reaction to less welcoming attitudes was expressed by several members interviewed. "If the city process appears to be impossibly difficult, there is only one solution — walk," said Pfeffer. "It's not likely that an economically favorable change in process can be secured within an acceptable time frame, if ever!" His view was reinforced by Tom Lohmann, Pinehurst Properties, who said he "avoids cities whose reputation is negative toward development." Said Munson, "Compromise is something we expect. But having to charge through flat out is not a path we choose. Even just an expressed willingness to work together can go a long way." Attitude and responsiveness are clearly hard to measure objectively. Patterson observed, "I know them when 1 see them. If a city has a negative attitude toward developers and development, you won't go there unless you absolutely have to." That viewpoint was reinforced by Zylla, who said "We look for city staff to have a `can do' kind of attitude, and find solutions for us, not roadblocks." Michael Leuer, Moen Leuer Construction, said cities should be more open and flexible in discussing modifications to their requirements. Martens and Carland also commented on the need for cities to be less rigid in their dealings with developers. Robert Pfefferle, Hines, agreed that cities should be more supportive in terms of planning and zoning. "We're willing to work within the comprehensive plan, but it's a fact that markets change. Cities need to recognize that, and offer some flexibility to developers based on what is actually taking place in the market," he said. Local political leaders should play a more active role in shaping city staff attitudes, observed David Kordonowy, Steiner Development. "They must understand that commercial and industrial development offers citizens options for employment and services, and then have city staff carry out that philosophy." "Commercial and industrial development offers citizens options for employment and services." — David Kordonowy, Steiner Development DG �L =00dE_ OCJ C�OC7 ODD LL�OC�C� SUE3001DOES (32 C OO NCESZ000 CAS Greater flexibility in considering developer requests for concessions or subsidies is also important, according to the survey respondents. "We compete against Minnesota cities that are aggressive, and Wisconsin cities that are even more aggressive," explained Glowa. "Without an even playing field, we can't compete." If a city is unwilling to help with unusual development costs on a site that has problems, "that's enough for us to look elsewhere," said Collins. That willingness on the part of a city to keep an open mind about providing assistance to a project that needs it— whatever form the help involved might take —is often the difference between, "a project that can happen and one that can't," said David Carland. "In many cases," explained Willson, "given the increasing costs of land and construction materials, subsidies are the only way we can consider pursuing some projects. The ability to limit some of the infrastructure costs or offer tax incentives is very often crucial to our being able to compete in the marketplace." 0 Such assistance is particularly important in urban revitalization projects, according to respondent Tom Lohmann, Pinehurst Properties. "Tax increment, if used wisely, can be a catalyst for development beyond the project for which it is used:' He described subsidies as, "necessary evils that first and second tier municipalities must consider in order to revitalize parts of their communities." Added Patterson, "Subsidies can have a huge impact on our decisions. From a user's perspective, and for the decision - making process, sites need to be economically equal." QOXc 30(01�1 The survey's results make one fact clear: in the opinion of most of the developers contacted, the great majority of metro area cities and their staffs are excellent to work with, and try to meet developers' needs. "Most cities are excellent", said Glowa. "Occasionally, we see some with attitudes opposing development. But cities are not islands. They should work hard with the business community to achieve win -win results." • "Most cities are excellent." I • -- Dale Glowa, United Properties In the experience of Paul Hyde, Real Estate Recycling, "projects get done where all of the stakeholders —the city, the neighborhood and the developer —share the same goals. You need everyone sailing in the same direction." "Still," said Wall, "some cities can be nightmares," while others, "embrace our projects and are receptive, friendly and helpful." "Cities and their staffs should not view developers as adversaries," commented Kent Carlson, Ryan Companies, "but as active facilitators in the growth of the community. We act as mediators and agents between the city and the businesses who occupy the buildings we develop. In that role, we can be a city's strongest and most productive advocate to the broader business community." As Cook observed, "cities and developers should work as partners. Any successful partnership is a combination of attitude, responsiveness, efficiency and cost." "If all of those are in place and working well," Cook said, " the process itself will also work well." "Cities and developers should work• partners. Any successful partnership is a combination of attitude, responsiveness, efficiency and cost." — Arne Cook, First Industrial Realty Trust NAIOP 4248 Park Glen Road • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • p: (952) 928 -7461 • f: (952) 929 -1318 • www.naiopmn.org • © Copyright 2005 Minnesota Chapter of NAIOP • 1� NAIOP MINNESOTA CHAPTER WHAT DEVELOPERS UN0M� ...is what Thomas Shaver OPUS Northwest LLC Vice President Real Estate Development 2005 President MN Ch - ter National this survey is all about! In the process of conducting our first City Survey in 2004, which focused on city - imposed development- related costs, fees and processing times, NAIOP was frequently asked the same question by interested city staffs: "This is great information, but what do the developers think ?" p The 2005 Developer Survey, Association of Industrial P Y> & Office Properties and this printed report, are the direct result of that question. NAIOP- Minnesota selected two dozen of its developer members, each of whom is active in development on a daily basis in the Twin Cities metro area, and quizzed them on their insights, opinions and attitudes. We asked them to rank the criteria they apply when choosing a city in which to develop. We also asked them, "Where are the delays and obstacles in receiving approval of a proposed development, and "how can the approval process itself be streamlined and made less costly in both time and money ?" You'll find their answers in this report, with special emphasis on their ideas for improving what is already a largely successful working relationship between city staffs and the development community. WHO IS THE TYPICAL NAIOP DEVELOPER MEMBER? (Based on the responses of 25 of NA101 "s leading developer members) The typical NAIOP developer has more than 10 years of experience as an active developer and... ...is employed by a development company that has been in business between 10 and 20 years. The typical NAIOP firm has an average of 16 employees engaged on a daily basis in developing commercial real estate and... ...averages $43 million worth of new development annually. Of the developer members responding, 88% develop industrial buildings, 76% develop office properties, 68% develop retail, and 48% are engaged in developing mixed -use (multifamily and retail) properties. WHERE ARE NAIOP DEVELOPERS MOST ACTIVE? (Number of responding developers active in these communities today or within the past two years) NAIOP Minnesota and its 820 members have always Minneapolis viewed cities and their professional staffs as partners 1 O in creating new, more efficient facilities for growing businesses. These companies —large and small —are the Maple Grove backbone of our state's economy, and a major contributor to the prosperity and tax base of each of the municipalities that responded to our 2005 City Survey. We trust that the information we've gathered —and the steps our members have suggested to improve the process —will help to enhance the relationship between developers and cities, thus creating new jobs, enlarging local tax bases, and developing more attractive and desirable environments in which employers can grow and prosper. — Tom Shaver 7 6 4 2 1 Bloomington St. Paul Blaine Albertville Mendota Becker Brooklyn St. Louis Park St. Louis Chanhassen Heights Edina Park 5 Park Champlin Minnetonka Hugo Eagan Woodbury Elk River New Brighton St. Cloud Rogers 3 Greenfield Plymouth South St. Roseville Eden Prairie Lake Elmo Rosemount Paul Shakopee Lino Lakes Lakeville Savage Spring Lake Monticello Medina Wayzata Park Savage WHERE DO THEY PLAN TO DEVELOP IN THE NEXT TWO YEARS? (Number of responding developers currently planning or actively considering a development in each of these cities) 5 Brooklyn Park Maple Grove 4 Minneapolis 3 Bloomington Eagan Monticello St. Paul Shakopee 2 Blaine Eden Prairie Plymouth Rogers Roseville St. Michael Savage Woodbury 1 Brooklyn Ctr. Lino Lakes Cambridge Medina Cottage Grove Mendota Hts. Dayton Minnetonka Hassan New Brighton Lake Elmo St. Louis Park Lakeville South St. Paul HAOOP DEVELOPERS OFFER THEM MEAS FOR M PROYNG �aE PROCESS ESS hen it conies to their working relationship, developers and the cities in which they operate may well be the "odd couple" of the business world. Although they often have similar objectives and many times share a common vision of the community's future, the relationship frequently stumbles over the processes required to get there. Here is an overview of the insights and recommendations offered by the developers we surveyed: MAKE THE PROCESS MORE PREDICTABLE AND CONSISTENT NAIOP developers were almost unanimous about one improvement: knowing what a city expects of them and then being confident that they can rely on those expectations remaining consistent throughout the process. They would like to see more cities make predictability and consistency in their requirements and expectations a basic principal in dealing with the development community. "The key issue is certainty." -- Rick Collins, Ryan Companies "The key issue for developers is certainty," said Rick Collins, Ryan Companies. "We need to be able to commit to a schedule, no matter how long it actually takes." Another said that scheduling delays, or a poorly- defined, almost en -ended process that seems to be made up as goes along, are sufficient reasons by themselves to rule out a city completely, and take a project somewhere else. "Each development opportunity requires that we manage several different activities at once," said Greg Anderson, Anderson Builders. "We Heed to know that there is a predetermined and well- contnuinicated process within respective municipalities." "Most important to me is knowing what the city expects and being able to depend on those expectations being consistent throughout the process," added Chris Willson, First Industrial Realty Trust. Emphasizing the need for more cities to adopt "time -and- schedule - sensitive" processes for reviewing and approving development proposals, NAIOP developers indicated the importance of understanding the relationship between time and money in the development business. "Tinting is essential when committing to a business tenant's schedules, and we are always racing against changing weather conditions in Minnesota," said Dale Glowa, United Properties. For complex redevelopment projects in particular, said Arne Cook, First Industrial Realty Trust, "we need more certain 0 swers, and we need them sooner!" edictability is important in controlling the process according to those responding to the survey. "City staff must have the professional skills required to manage the process through to final city council approval," commented one member. "At the end of the day, the planning staffs need to direct the process and firmly guide elected officials to a reasoned decision," said Paul Maenner, JMW Development, LLC. Added Cook, "problems develop when a city council does not empower its professional planning staff to do their jobs, or even ignores their recommendations." An additional challenge was cited by Joe Weis, Weis Builders, who observed that, in his experience, "city councils and their planning commissions are losing control of the zoning process to the neighborhoods." The solution, said John Wall, Wall Companies, is for, "a city's leadership to look ahead, agree on a vision and then try to rally their bureaucracy to pursue the same objective." COMMUNICATE BETTER WITH THE DEVELOPER - RESPOND QUICKLY AND ACCURATELY An open question in developers' minds seems to be whether some city staffs "truly mirror the views of their own councils." Making Sure that city staff and council members are in harmony on where the city is headed adds significantly to the reliability of the process and the predictability of the outcome. Cities that view their staffs as true experts, and value their reports and recommendations, are the best to work with, said several respondents. "Timely and straightforward communications are critical," said Rick Martens, Brookstone Development, Inc. "Un- returned phone calls, hard -to- arrange meetings are a problem. Even if the news is not good, we need to know. We can't operate in a realm of uncertainty." "Initial staff feedback on our development concepts is crucial," explained Maenner. "It's the key to our `go forward' or `drop' decision." Once that initial staff assessment is made, it must be in a form that is reliable and can be acted upon, without fear of future unanticipated demands or changing requirements, he added. "With the right access to the right people, we can make decisions that speed up the process and ensure that things are accomplished properly." - Scott Tankenoff, Hillcrest Development Ready access to city staff is part of the communications challenge, too, according to Scott Tankenoff, Hillcrest Development. "With the right access to the right people, we can make decisions that speed up the process and ensure that things are accomplished properly," he said. Said another member: "Tell me what exactly what I have to do, and when I have to do it. But don't keep me guessing. The development process and surprises just don't ntix." Calling sudden changes of direction, or changes in requirements, the "bane of the development business," others interviewed pointed out that city staff needs to understand and appreciate that they are always racing against challenges- Minnesota's weather, for example, "or the need to maintain site control, always difficult under the best conditions," according to David Carland, CSM Corp., or, "the ability to commit to prospective tenants that we can deliver their space in time," said another. Greg Munson, McGough Development, also pointed out the difficulty of closing on the financing for a project if final city approvals are unexpectedly delayed due to changes in city requirements. "The quicker we can flush out the issues that matter, the better," said Tony Kuechle, United Properties. "It will save both city staff and us a lot of time and money." KEEP THE COSTS INVOLVED IN THE PROCESS FAIR AND PROJECT- RELATED Apparently nothing quite sets a developer's teeth on edge like the frequently uttered phrase, "fees." In our survey, and in other in- person interviews conducted with NAIOP members who are fulltime developers, many made the point that they have nothing against being charged and paying realistic costs for infrastructure improvements directly related to their proposals. What seems grossly unfair to them are fees or costs that, in their view, are unconnected to their proposals. Said Glowa, "We receive absolutely no value for the park dedication fees we are required to pay. They should be eliminated." Added another, "Park dedication fees are a very large cost from which we receive no direct benefits that 1 can see. They only benefit residents in another area of the community." NAIOP developers are not anti -fee, and certainly understand the cost pressures currently facing municipalities. However, many questioned city - imposed fees where there is no connection to the project they are proposing. "Cities must stop increasing or adding fees just because they need more revenue," observed Craig Patterson, Welsh Development, LLC. "Stop adding extra charges to fix other city budget problems," said another developer, advising them to instead, "encourage capital reinvestment in their land base. The long- term benefits would outweigh the short -term gain from fee generation." Others pointed to excessive costs resulting from the use of outside consultants. "Cities should actively participate in controlling consultants' fees, which are a pass - through," said Munson. "Developers are expected to manage all of our consultants to a certain budget, but we can't control the city's consultants. While it is obvious that cities must rely on some outside services, 4248 Park Glen Road • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • p: (952) 928 -7461 • f: (952) 929 -1318 • www.naiopmn.org • © Copyright 2005 Minnesota Chapter of NAIOP NAIOP Date: Sep I4th, 2005 To, Dr. Kenneth Dragseth, Superintendent Edina Public Schools Sub: Safety of Kindergarten students during transportation Sir, We are writing this letter to inform you that we have serious objection to the transportation route for our children attending Countryside Elementary School. Our children Manbir Guron and Dominick Ingram started Kindergarten CP program at Countryside Elementary School on Sep. 8th, 2005. In the morning Manbir is assigned Bus No. 30 to take him to Highlands Elementary and then he has to transfer to Bus No. 92 to go to Countryside. In the evening Manbir has to take Bus No. 89 from Countryside to Highlands and then transfer to Bus No. 30 from Highlands to come back home. Dominick has to take Bus No. 83 in the morning to reach Highlands and then transfer to Bus No. 92 to reach Countryside and in evening he has to take Bus No. 31 to come home. This is a very complex plan for 5 year old kindergarteners to follow and especially when they are not expected to know such numbers, let alone remember them. Kids that young are expected to navigate lines of yellow buses and reach the correct bus. Buses run on very tight timings as such and kids missing a bus, getting confused and walking off the school premises is an accident waiting to happen. I have heard the argument from school transportation officials that the schools have not lost a kid yet. Are you waiting for a child to disappear before you make changes to a bad decision? On Sep. 80h, 2005 Dominick Ingram was left at Highlands and another child was left wandering at Countryside. We are sure these are not isolated incidents too. Is that kind of emotional torture acceptable to the transportation office, school district and parents? Also what has worked in past does not translate necessarily into a safe alternative for present times. This is a big safety issue. Younger kids are more gullible to walk off with a stranger from any such bus transfer spots. Bad weather days can complicate the situation. This situation is ripe for abductions or other serious crimes. We request that security and safety of such bus transfers be reevaluated seriously and actions taken to either eliminate the need of such transfers for younger kids or school programs /timings modified. We request that bus transfers should be supervised until changes are implemented. Another issue is the notice for transportation. The notice of transportation clearly states that Manbir Guron, goes and returns from school on Bus #30. I have enclosed a copy of the notice. It is not clear anywhere that Bus No. 30 is a "Highlands bus ". There are five adults, including the teacher, who read this notice and did not understand your "fine print ". This notice is misleading and needs to be withdrawn. You are requested to reissue a transportation notice that your staff and parents can understand. We will appreciate it if your office keeps us abreast of your decisions. Thanks Ku eet Kaur and Charanjeet . Guron Giovanna Ingram and Terry Ingram 5920 Kellogg Ave. 6000 France Ave. Edina Edina Ph (952) 285 -2834 Ph (952) 926 -8232 CC. I. Julie Hatzung, Principal Countryside Elementary School 2. Peter Hodne, Principal Highlands Elementary School. 3. James Willemssen, Business Services Director. 4. David White, Supervisor, Transportation Services. 5. Bert Ledder, School Board, Edina Public Schools. 6. James Hovland, Mayor, City of Edina. 7. Michael Siitari, Police chief, City of Edina. it A, MINUTES OF THE w Edina Transportation Commission o e �� Thursday, September 15, 2005 0 Edina City Hall v �y 4801 West 50th Street Community Room MEMBERS PRESENT: Fred Richards, Marie Thorpe, Wanninger, Dean Dovolis MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: Steve Lillehaug, Sharon Allison L Call to Order Jean - White, Warren Plante, Joni Kelly Bennett, Les Chair Richards called the meeting to order. I/. ' ' New Business a. soutnwest 1 ransinNav puternauves mnai, bibfatuu - u uata Katie Walker, Hennepin Coty trduce,` `her co league in attendance with her, Stephanie Eiler and Kathie Doty, consulting�teamm tubers workn on the above listed study. Walker also noted that ETC Com, issione 1lU h a s, rve on the Policy Committee while staff Lillehaug g s:. serves on the Technical C��ommitte FF= Walker explained that they are` partnering with five cities (St. Louis Park, Hopkins, Eden P Prairie, Minnetonka and A';Min eapolis) exploring the options for public transportation from downtown Minneapolis - - i southwest metro area. They've identified four possible routes and three transit options (conventional bus, bus rapid transit and light rail transit). The Commissioners wanted to know why Edina was not invited as a partnering city. Eiler said Edina was invited to participate, but it was not included because it does not have a station. In addition, a few years back, both Edina and Bloomington, made it very clear that they did not want light rail in their community when they voted down the Dan Patch light rail and it was removed from the Met Council's 2030 plan. Walker said while a station is not planned for Edina, it could be affected or served by the transit. Richards said the ETC does not speak for the Council, but it seems the community would be well served with light rail considering the number of Edina residents that works downtown Minneapolis, probably even more so than some of the partnering cities. Bennett expressed disappointment with the current plan because it seems to imply that other communities would be enhanced while Edina will not. Walker said a requirement in terms of travel time reduction is that all residents near and around the routes are better off as 'a result of light rail and they certainly would like Edina's residents to benefit also. The ETC asked that they look at including a route in Edina. Walker said she would take the ETC's comments back and begin an internal discussion to see how this will affect or change the current plans. b. Cypress Equities Development, 7311 France Avenue (Previous Edina Theater Site The developer has requested an amendment to the zoning ordinance to allow them to demolish the theater and build an 18 story mixed -used development. A traffic study was done that compared previous use when the theater was in operation and expected use. Lillehaug said staff, as Well as Hennepin County, gave the developers some conditions that would need ,to be satisfied, including reconfiguration of the intersection at Gallagher Drive and France Avenue. Staff is recommending approval of the traffic study. Comments and /or questions raised by the Commissioners to the consultant are as follow: o Will traffic on Gallagher operate in much the same way? Yes o Will development exacerbate conditions, as they exist today? No, there is enough capacity at the intersection of Gallagher and France. o Did the study consider other proposed developments, i.e. the Greater Southdale Study, and its impact? The traffic study did account for some growth but did not consider proposed redevelopment. Lillehaug said it would not be fair to require this applicant to include intensification of future traffic from other potential redevelopment. o There-appears to be gap of approximately 86 parking spaces between parking required and parking provided. Lillehaug said the Planning Commission would look at this area more closely. He suggested that the ETC recommend that the applicant clarify this issue. o Is there going to be a sidewalk along Gallagher and France? Lillehaug said the applicant is open to including sidewalks on both Gallagher and France and will further be coordinated taking into account the Greater Southdale Study. Wanninger recommended boulevard style sidewalk for safety. o What will happen at the location where Gallagher goes east and then north? Lillehaug said one of the conditions to the development is to build a cul -de -sac at this location. A motion was made by Dovolis to approve the traffic study with the following conditions: building of a boulevard sidewalk on Gallagher and France and ensure on- site parking is adequate and the separate buildings contain adequate parking for their respective parking needs. Motion seconded by Wanninger. Ayes — 5 Nayes — 2 (Bennett, Plante) c. Gramercy Development, 7100 & 7180 Metro Boulevard Gramercy Development has submitted a proposal to build a senior housing complex at the above listed address. A traffic study was done that compared previous use as well as a previous approved plan by the Council. The traffic study shows a reduction in trip generation. Staff is recommending approval of the traffic study. Comments and/or questions raised by the Commissioners to the consultant are as follow: o Will the driveway on W. 70th Street line up with the driveway across the street? No, the driveway on W. 70th Street is being removed. 2 o Are trails and sidewalks being built so that the residents can safely access the businesses at Cahill? There are no plans at this time to build sidewalks. Lillehaug said the area is not pedestrian friendly at this time but staff is planning to redo the intersection of W. 70th Street and Metro Blvd. in 2006 and the plans will evaluate adding sidewalk in this area. A motion was made by Wanninger to approve the traffic study. Motion seconded by Dovolis. Ayes — 5 Nayes —1 (Plante) Abstain —1 (Bennett) 111. Old Business a. Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan Brochure The changes recommended by the ETC were made with the exception of the back cover. Bennerotte, the Communications Director, recommended leaving it blank so it can be used as a mailer. A motion was made by Wanninger to approve the publication of the brochure. Motion seconded by White. Ayes — 7 Nayes — 0 IV. Handouts a. Correspondence ° September 9, 2005 Memo — Marketing Campaign, Communications Director Jennifer Bennerotte Lillehaug reported that the In- street Sign posters were distributed all over the city and the school district has expressed an interest in getting more posters. The posters will also be inserted as an ad in the Sun Newspaper. A motion was made by Wanninger to approve printing 5000 copies of the NTMP brochure. Motion was seconded by Plant. Ayes — 7 Nayes — 0 V. Approval of Minutes a. August 18, 2005 Correction on page 2, 2" paragraph — change 2nd Street to 102nd Street. A motion was made by Bennett to approve the minutes with above change. Motion was seconded by Dovolis. VI. Open Discussion Wanninger said he likes the stripping on Wooddale Avenue. Other Commissioners concurred. Lillehaug recommended a special meeting to recommend approval of the RFP for the NE Edina Traffic Study. The special meeting is scheduled for October 6' at 6:00 p.m. in the Community Room. 3 4 Chair Richards announced his resignation from the ETC effective at the conclusion of tonight's meeting. Meeting adjourned. The 'next regular meeting is scheduled for October 20, 2005, 6:00 -8:00 p.m. in the Community Room, City Hall. Darlene Wallin From: Steve Lillehaug Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 8:28 AM To: Darlene Wallin Cc: Wayne Houle Subject: FW: Curbs and Gutters (South Harriet Park) Darlene, It should also be noted that I discussed with Mr. Holmes the fact that adding curb and gutter to the project in its entirety at this point is extremely difficult. It would add a large additional cost to the project and would require significant changes to the point that the project would be delayed until next year and the streets would not be able to be paved this year if this were changed. I also indicated that staff is not at liberty to make this decision. It must be made by the City Council as it was a specific non - approval item to be installed in the entire neighborhood. Thanks. Steve - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wayne Houle Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 8:21 AM To: Steve Lillehaug Subject: RE: Curbs and Gutters (South Harriet Park) Steve: Did you inform him that it is too late to change the design? Can you resend this to Darlene with that info? Thanks Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Steve Lillehaug Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 8:19 AM To: Darlene Wallin Cc: Sharon Allison; Wayne Houle Subject: Curbs and Gutters (South Harriet Park) Hello Darlene. This correspondence was received from a resident who requested that we forward to the Council. Please provide as a handout to the Council at tonight's meeting. Thanks. Steve - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Steve Lillehaug Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 4:20 PM To: 'Todd G Holmes' Subject: RE: Curbs and Gutters Todd. Thank you for your e -mail. I will pass this on to the City Council as discussed. Thanks. Steve Steven L. Lillehaug, PE, PTOE Assistant City Engineer /Traffic Engineer 952 -826 -0445 slillehaug@ci.edina.mn.us 1 City of Edina Engineering Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com (fax) 952 - 826 -0389 - - - -- original Message---- - From: Todd G Holmes [mailto:tgholmes @juno.com] Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 4:09 PM . To: Steve Lillehaug Subject: Curbs and Gutters Dear Mr Lillehaug, As we discussed on the phone today, we would be in favor of our neighborhood getting curbs and gutters, the surmountable type in our case. As we already have half our frontage with curbs and gutters due to placement of the catch basins, completing the job would be better for the esthetics of our property as well as better for the longevity of the street pavement. In addition, as our property is at the bottom of.a steep hill, at least completing the curbs and gutters to the corner of 54th Street would aid in water flow and prevent erosion, and still be possible in the short time line left for this construction season. Lastly, as the city's policy for assessment for curbs and gutters has changed since our neighborhood was first polled about this issue, I suspect many would change their minds knowing it would not add to their assessment, and after seeing how many curbs have had to be placed anyway. A quick telephone survey could be done to determine this, before the pavement has been laid. Thanks for your help, Sincerely, Todd Holmes 5328 Brookview Ave Edina, MN 55424 �I 0 Darlene Wallin 'rom: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 2:19 PM To: Darlene Wallin Subject: FW: Attn: Mayor and City Council; 70th street - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Jonathan Fernands [mailto:jfernands @yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 1:32 PM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: Attn: Mayor and City Council; 70th street Good Afternoon- - I am an Edina resident living at 6905 West Shore Drive. I recently visited with the the city's engineering and public works department. My purpose for the visit was to inquire about installation of In- Street - Pedestrian signs on 70th street at the crosswalks at both Cornelia and West Shore Drive. During that visit, I learned that there is a study of 70th street currently being considered for funding in the near future. Therefore, I am writing to urge you to vote to fund this study. As I'm sure you're aware 70th street is not designed to handle 17,000 cars a day -- 85% of whom travel at +/- 38 mph -- I am concerned about 70th street and I believe a study is warranted. Thank you, Jonathan Fernands 6905 West Shore Drive 952 - 922 -9353 Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http: / /mail.yahoo.com 1 ;Co -ops Could be Housing Answer for Aging Baby Boomers, Elderly Page 1 of 3 wo ingt+onpost com Sign In I Register Now PRINT EDITION I Subscribe to alt ingfon past • • powered h l SEARCH: � News Q Web � _ -- _ - _ -- _ - _ - - P Y�,tdt7U�:5EARG#�1 Top 20 E -mai E NONAGE comes I pkt with tots of features. washingtonpost.com > Real Estate Print This Article ' Co -ops Could be Housing Answer for Aging E -Mail This Article Baby Boomers, Elderly MOST VIEWED ARTICLES ' - -- _ -# By Katherine Salant i Real Estate On the Site Updated 3:45 p.m. ET j Saturday, September 10, 2005; Page F04 • Eco- Friendlv in the Kitchen • Back, or Front, to School • Beware Shenanigans In j Settlement Fees • Composite Materials Work j Well On Decks • At Riderwood. Staving Active Is Easily Accomplished I e Advertisement In the United States, trends generally start on the East or West Coast and move inward. But once in a while, the reverse happens -- the innovation begins in the Midwest and ripples out. Senior cooperatives are one such example. Advert This modestly sized, low -rise, multifamily housing that began in Minneapolis about 30 years ago is still largely a Minnesota phenomenon, but imitators are slowly spreading to other midwestern states as well as to Texas, Arkansas and even Alaska. Advert Senior co- operative residents rave about them. To me, senior co -ops seem tailor -made for aging baby boomers who famously want to do things their way, be in control, flout tradition, confound expectation and never grow old. This was my conclusion after touring a number of projects in the Minneapolis area at the invitation of Miller Hanson Partners, a Minneapolis architectural firm that has designed more senior co -ops than any other firm in the country. Yes, it is hard to imagine aging L 2� Via. t Ed^^ � 'Pa S,ry _'e ■ \ r. r �k �p This 1,332- square -foot, one - bedroom, two- bathroom unit is currently selling for $141,UUU with a down payment share price of $90,576 and is typical of the newer "senior co -ops" in the Twin Cities area of Minnesota. (Miller Hanson Partners) REAL ESTATE f Real Estate Front Buy a Home FEAT • Sig • Coll • NA: • Law • 161 • For • Refi • 5 wi •Cog http : / /www. wash ingtonpost. comlwp- dynlcontentlarticle /2005 /09 /09lAR2005 090901002. ht... 9/20/2005 ,.Co -ops Could be Housing Answer for Aging Baby Boomers, Elderly RSS 'NEWS .FEEDS µ4M 1 Top News Real Estate i What is RSS? I All RSS Feeds boomers flocking from their houses to apartments reserved for people older than 55. But the sentiments expressed by co -op residents who recently moved in should resonate with the oldest boomers because, age -wise and culturally, they are not so far apart. The oldest boomers are nearly 60. The average age of the residents at move -in is about 72, but many are in their 60s. Sell a Home Home Improvement i D.C. Area Living HOME VALUES Page 2 of 3 Find recent sale prices and assessed values in the Washington area: Owner Last Name ZIP code �] F` and /or _ L� -++-1 Search by Price, Seller. etc. I -ftiR The residents all said they had given up on owning single - family homes because it had become, in boomer parlance, a huge drag. They were more than ready to say goodbye to shoveling snow, mowing grass and doing all the other chores that come with owning a house, and embrace a more carefree lifestyle. Their downsizing wasn't disheartening or disrupting, it was liberating. Better yet, the move did not disrupt the rest of their lives. Senior co- op developers in the Twin Cities carefully target their market for each project. Most buyers live within a few miles of their building site, making it easy to maintain contact with the old neighborhood and even attend the same church. One couple moved only three blocks, and the husband still goes walking with his old neighbors every morning. Though most residents are retired, about a quarter of the residents in the newer projects are still working. Most co -ops have many weekly events and the occasional community-wide meal, but regular meals and health care services are not offered. Residents who need these can bring them in, but if outside care is not available or residents need more care than they can import, they will have to move to an assisted- living or continuing -care facility or to a nursing home. What do the senior co -ops look like? Knowing that current buyers and the burgeoning boomer market will avoid anything that hints of being institutional, the Miller Hanson firm has gone to great lengths to design multiunit housing with a homey touch. The three- and four -story buildings range in size from about 40 to 100 units. The entry lobby is inviting, and the community's great room, always located near the entrance, is designed to feel comfortable when it's only a third or half full, as well as when all the residents turn out for a holiday occasion. In the private areas, the buildings are typically configured to create the illusion that the corridors are short. They turn and fork so that in http: / /www.washingtonpost. com/wp -dyn/ content / article l2005 /09/09lAR2005090901002. ht... 9/20/2005 ,Co -ops Could be Housing Answer for Aging Baby Boomers, Elderly Page 3 of 3 any stretch of hallway you see only three or four units at a time. The corridor width is generous, but not so generous that it begins to feel like a hospital or nursing home. The units are smaller than the houses the residents vacated, but not as small as you might expect. In the Twin Cities area, the average size of a new unit is about 1,200 square feet (half the size of the average new house), but units as large as 1,500 square feet are not unusual. Some are more than 2,000 square feet. CONTINUED 1 2 Next > j Print This Article E -Mail This Article © 2005 The Washington Post Company Advertisemenl Advertising Links �^ G� Mmn� �- VVhats this? _. . Cohousing with a Vision Join us on a 7 acre slice of heaven nestled by a tree -lined creek. Private residences, common house. Near Seattle. Units still available. 4 www.bartcommunity.org Roommates.com - CO Housing I Find CO housing. E -Mail match notification, detailed member profiles, photos, maps, f i personal messaging center and more. Free to list and search. Sign up for complete fj access. www.roommates.com SEARCH:* News Q Web I , , po .erred by . g�QQPaS A CH NEWS I OPINIONS I SPORTS I ARTS & LIVING Discussions I Photos & Video I Entertainment Guide CLASSIFIEDS washingtonpost.com: Contact Us I About Us I Work at washingtonpost.com I Advertise I Media Center I Site Index I Site Map Archives I E -mail Newsletters I RSS Feeds I Wireless Access I Make Us Your Homepage I mywashingtonpost.com The Washington Post: Subscribe I Subscriber Services I Advertise I Electronic Edition I Online Photo Store I The Washington P The Washington Post Company: Information and Other Post Co. Websites © Copyright 1996- 2005 The Washington Post Company I User Agreement and Privacy Policy I Rights and Permissions http: / /www. washingtonpost. com/ wp- dyn/ contentlarticle l2005/09/09lAR2005090901002. ht... 9/20/2005 dh H , ,- 6800 France Ave. South Suite #145 Edina, MN 55435 952 - 922 -0301 Fax 952 - 922 -7547 September 9, 2005 City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Attn: Mayor and Council Members Re: RFP for Insurance Mayor and Council, William P. Homeyer, CPCU John R. Harris, CPCU +� Douglas H. Crowther David W. Crowther Timothy S. Gonsior I am writing this letter to give you my thoughts on a possible RFP for insurance. I happened to be watching the Council Meeting on cable TV when the subject was brought up. I would preface my remarks with the following two statements: (1) The Council has an absolute right to do whatever it wants as respects the insurance. (2) That I am not exactly an unbiased observer. The coverages that our agency writes, Worker's Compensation, Automobile, and Liability are - offered- byvery-few insurance companies as respects mumcipalites� -If tfiere are agents that have carriers other than ST PAUL and the LEAGUE, then I say that they should offer a quote. I realize that many more companies would be willing to submit a quotation on the property portion of the insurance. My understanding is that there has only been two inquiries from other agents in the last 6 -8 years. One last spring, where after the agent met with staff, the agent said they could not improve on the program. The other about 7 years ago, when the agent, MARSH, after many meetings and numerous hours, said that their price was over $1,000,000 and did not even want to put their price in writing. So it appears to me that the only thing that could possible be accomplished with a RFP is that you switch agents because another agent may provide the same coverages with the same carriers for less commission. When I have gotten quotes from other companies, those quotes have been sent directly to the City to avoid any appearance or suspicion that the agency is somehow "cooking the numbers ". Mayor Hovland, Gordon Hughes, and Ceil Smith may recall that on at least three occasions former Council member and Mayor Glen Smith asked me in front of the Council "would you be willing to write our account for a fee ?" and on all the occasions I said "yes ". So if the Council thinks the commissions on this account are excessive, then that is what should be discussed. However, if the staff and Council think our service is lacking, then it doesn't matter what the commissions are, you should switch agents. Staff has told me that our service has been excellent over the 28 years that we have handled your account. I am not going to go into all the things that we have done over the years, because it just sounds self - serving, but I think the Council should ask the staff what they think of our service. Thank y u, illiam P. Homeyer P.S. Since writing this letter I was contacted on September 13th by Zurich Insurance Group about their Municipality program. If we are still the agent, I intend to have them quote next year, with the quote being sent directly to staff.