Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2006-05-16_COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL MAY 16, 2006 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold . print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of May 2, 2006. II. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES (EMS) WEEK PROCLAIMED - MAY 14-2012006 I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of May 2, 2006, Special Council Meeting of May 2, 2006, and Board of Appeal and Equalization of May 4, 2006. II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Zoning Ordinances: First Reading requires affirmative rollcall votes of three Council members except that a rezoning from residential to non - residential requires four affirmative votes. Second Reading requires affirmative rollcall votes of three of Council to pass except rezoning from residential to non - residential requires four affirmative votes. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall votes of four members of Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Properly Zoned Planned District: Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council members required passing. Conditional Use Permit: Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council members required to pass. Variance Appeal: Favorable rollcall of Council Members present to uphold or deny appeal Rollcall A. FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL INCLUDING SETBACK VARIANCES DUE TO THE HEIGHT OF BUILDINGS FOR CYPRESS EQUITIES 7311 France Avenue South. Generally located west of York Avenue and south of 70th Street West. Rollcall B. FINAL PLAT - Loring Manor Second Addition, 6621 Normandale Road -all C. PUBLIC HEARING - FINAL REZONING R -1 SINGLE FAMILY TO PRD -3, PLANNED RESIDENTAL DISTRICT Noonan Construction/ Kingdom Properties: Brownstones on France. 5300 France Avenue South, Edina, MN (north parking lot area). Generally located east of France Avenue and south of 52nd Street West. Agenda /Edina City Council May 16, 2006 Page 2 III. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS IV. AWARD OF BID A. 2006 Treatment of Lakes and Ponds B. Asphalt Pathway Repair - Bredesen Park C. Roof Replacement - Braemar Arena D. ABB Variable Frequency Drive - Well #2 E. Asphalt Street Repairs From Water Main Repair Damage V. REPORTS/ RECOMMENDATIONS A. Amended Joint and Cooperative Agreement Requiring Annual Audits for the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission B. Change Order No. 2 - Contract PW 05 -3 - Wooddale Water Treatment Plan C. Resolution Accepting Various Donations D. Traffic Safety Report Minutes of May 2, 2006 E. Change Order No.1 Arnt Construction - Southview Middle School Gymnasium Construction VI. FINANCE A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per Pre -List dated, May 3, 2006, TOTAL $564,178.73; and, May 10, 2006, TOTAL $878,865.91. VII. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS A. Gabbert & Beck VIII. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES IX. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL X. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEM Mon May 29 Tues June 6 Tues June 20 Tues July 4 Wed July 5 Tues July 18 Tues Aug 1 Tues Aug 15 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS MEMORIAL DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Office Closed Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. INDEPENDENCE DAY - City Hall Office Closed Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBr- , COUNCIL CHAME COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL MAY 2, 2006 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Hulbert, Masica, Swenson and Chair Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner. Masica and seconded by Commissioner Hulbert approving the Consent Agenda for the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR APRIL 18, 2006, APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Masica and seconded by Commissioner. Hulbert approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for April 18, 2006, as presented. Motion carried. on rollcall vote — four ayes. There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda, Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned. Executive Director AQ A I\ 0 ieHe A PROCLAMATION. WHEREAS, emergency medical services is a vital public service, and teams of the Edina Fire and Police Departments are ready to provide lifesaving care to those in need 24 hours a day, seven days a week, and WHEREAS, access to quality emergency care dramatically improves the survival rate and recovery rate of those who experience sudden illness or injury; and WHEREAS, the emergency medical services system consist of emergency physicians, emergency nurses, emergency medical technicians, paramedics, firefighters, educators, administrators, and others who have traditionally served as the safety net of America's health care system; and WHEREAS, emergency medical services responders of the Edina Fire and Police departments engage in thousands of hours of specialized training and continuing education to enhance their lifesaving skills, and the citizens of the City of Edina benefit daily from this knowledge and skills of these highly trained individuals, and the appropriate use of the Emergency Medical Services System will help reduce health care cost; and WHEREAS, it is appropriate to recognize the value and accomplishments of the Edina Police and Edina Fire emergency medical personnel who serve to protect us. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that I, James B. Hovland, the Mayor of the City of Edina, do hereby acknowledge the week of May 14 -20, 2006, as "Emergency Medical Services Week" in the City of Edina in honor and recognition of the valuable contributions made by the Edina Emergency Medical Service Providers to the health and well -being of our citizens. Mayor James B. Hovland MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD TUESDAY, MAY 2, 2006 AT 6:00 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 6:00 P.M. in Community Room of Edina City Hall. Answering rollcall were the following members of the City Council: Hulbert, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Staff present included: Gordon Hughes, City Manager, John Wallin, Finance Director, Eric Roggeman, Assistant Finance Director, Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications and Marketing Director and Debra Mangen, City Clerk. Manager Hughes explained the City ended 2005 with revenues over budget by approximately $1,475,000. He said the majority of the 2005 excess revenue came from building permits and ambulance services. Mr. Hughes referred to the Finance Department memorandum that gave a more in depth explanation of the 2005 excess revenues. He noted the Finance Department recommended the majority of the 2005 revenue be allotted to the Construction Fund for the purpose of enhancing the sustainability of the City's Capital Improvement Program. Mr. Hughes supported the recommendation. Mr. Hughes also pointed out other options available to the Council including using a portion of the surplus to reduce the 2007 taxes. He gave background on where excess revenues have been designated in past years. The Council discussed various uses of the 2005 excess levy. Their consensus was to retain approximately $1,000,000 in the General Fund to be allocated during the 2007 Budget discussion and to follow the staff recommendations for the remaining designations as detailed below: _. _Parkland_ Dedication Fund $ 11,374 Reserve for Commitments ($ 23,020) used for RPC activities ($ 20,000) used for Lewis Park blacktop $ 21,264 reserved for Public Art Committee $ 7,412 reserved for election carryover ($ 48,829) used for equipment replacement Employee Separation $100,000 to cover employee separation Public Works Commodities/ Projects $100,000 for portion of resurfacing St. Louis Park border streets Fuel /Heat /Light $150,000 for budget overruns Traffic Studies/ Other Contingencies $100,000 unbudgeted traffic studies, etc. Liquor Fund Transfer $686,000 support of Capital Improvement Program Reserve for General Fund Operations $949,977 for cash flow and future budget or other. considerations Respectfully submitted, Debra Manaen, City Clerk MINUTES OF THE OF THE EDINA BOARD OF REVIEW MAY 4, 2006 5:00 P.M. Answering rollcall for the continued meeting of the Board of Review were Members Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, and Mayor Hovland. Mayor Hovland explained the purpose of the continuation meeting was to allow the Board to take action on the cases presented in person by residents and by the City Assessor on behalf of absent residents regarding the 2006 assessed value of property. After action by the local Board of Review residents may continue the process with Hennepin County. Motion of Member Swenson, seconded by Member Hulbert to refer the following properties +n +hu NPnnPnin ('minty Rnard: Ayes: Housh Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Motion of Member Swenson, seconded by Member Masica to refer the following properties 4-- 41.e ('nttn+v RnarA- 2006 2006 STAFF APPLICANT PID ORIGINAL REQUESTED RECOMMEN - DATION Gary & Tanya Lehr 30- 028 -24 -14 -0103 $291,900 $230,000 $277,000 6566 France Ave. So. # 905 09- 116 -21 -23 -0012 $ 2,032,200 $ 1,500,000 $ 2,032,200 William Bednarczyk 30- 028 -24 -14- 0114 $418,300 $366,400 $351,000 6566 France Ave. So. # 1004 30- 028 -24-44 -0001 $ 499,100 $ 350,000 $ 499,100 Jack Leibman 30- 028 -24 -14 -0105 $291,900 $250,000 $291,900 6566 France Ave. So. #907 19- 028 -24 -43 -0077 $ 365,600 $ 100,000 $ 365,600 Donald Cieminski 30- 028 -24 -14 -0067 $280,500 Not Specified $277,000 6566 France Ave. So. #605 Ayes: Housh Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Motion of Member Swenson, seconded by Member Masica to refer the following properties 4-- 41.e ('nttn+v RnarA- STAFF APPLICANT PID ORIGINAL REQUESTED RECOMMEN - DATION COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL Milpitas & Flemming 09- 116 -21 -23 -0012 $ 2,032,200 $ 1,500,000 $ 2,032,200 5201 West 73rd Street James Lindsey 30- 028 -24-44 -0001 $ 499,100 $ 350,000 $ 499,100 6996 France Avenue South James Shear 19- 028 -24 -43 -0077 $ 365,600 $ 100,000 $ 365,600 4412 Valley View Road James Shear 19- 028 -24 -43 -0078 $ 490,500 $ 400,000 $ 490,500 6133 Kellogg Avenue Industrial Property [-�Cabot L.P. 08- 116 -21 -41 -0013 $ 2,052,800 Not Specified $ 2,052,800 7401 Cahill Road Minutes/Board of Review/May 4, 2006 Milpitas & Flemming 09- 116 -21 -23 -0013 $ 2,539,400 Not Specified $ 2,539,400 7320 Ohms Lane Shaner SPE Associates 32- 028 -24 -32 -0025 $ 6,446,000 $ 6,000,000 $ 6,446,000 3400 Edinborough Way Main Street Partners 31- 028 -24 -41 -0008 $1,708,000 Not Specified $1,708,000 4444 West 76th Street LETTERS Dino Balafas 30- 117 -21=44 -0061 $ 671,600 Not Specified $ 671,600 5316 Blake Road Christopher Dahl 29- 117 -21 -14 -0023 $ 751,300 $ 735,000 $ 751,300 5404 Interlachen Boulevard Thomas Peltola 31- 117 -21 -23 -0024 $1,157,300 Not Specified $1,157,300 6604 Dovre Drive James Vose 18- 028 -24 -12 -0076 $ 754,000 Not Specified $ 754,000 4529 Casco Avenue Bonnie Scott 31- 117 -21 -32 -0022 $ 190,100 Not Specified $ 190,100 6830 Langford Drive WALK -INS Dave Thompson 05- 116 -21 -13 -0057 $ 517,700 Not Specified $ 517,700 5517 Valley Lane Eliane Murphy 08- 116 -21 -12 -0041 $ 373,100 Not Specified $ 373,100 5539 Village Drive Dan Schleck 31- 028 -24 -31 -0033 $ 571,800 Not Specified $ 571,800 7408 Kellogg Avenue South Scott Forbes 30- 028 -24-23 -0064. $ 334,400 Not Specified $ 334,400 6516 West Shore Drive Jeff Hovanec 18- 028 -24 -42 -0012 $1,578,500 Not Specified $1,578,500 5030 Bruce Place Ayes: Housh Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. The Board reviewed each property submitted and discussed whether to sustain, decrease or increase the assessors estimated market value. Motion of Member Swenson, seconded by Member Housh to reduce the 2006 estimated market value to $824,500 for 5109 Ridge Road, PID 30- 117 -2142 -0024. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Motion of Member Swenson, seconded by Mayor Hovland to reduce the 2006 estimated market value to $737,900 for 5021 Schaefer Road, PID 30- 117 -2141 -0004. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. U Minutes/Board of Review/May 4, 2006 Motion by Member Masica, seconded by Member Hulbert to sustain the 2006 estimated -iarket value of $347,700 for 5950 Walnut Drive PID 31- 117 -21 -31 -0026. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Motion by Member Swenson, seconded by Member Masica to reduce the 2006 estimated market value to $827,900 for 6620 Dovre Drive, PID 31- 117 -21 -24 -0020. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Motion by Mayor Hovland, seconded by Member Housh to reduce the 2006 estimated market value to $402,500 for 4912 Payton Court, PID 30- 028 -24 -32 -0040. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Motion by Member Masica, seconded by Member Swenson to sustain the 2006 estimated market value of $485,000 for 5800 Olinger Boulevard, PID 32- 117 -21 -34 -0071. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Motion by Member Masica, seconded by Member Hulbert to sustain the 2006 estimated market value of $386,800 for 5828 Dewey Hill Road, PID 08- 116 -21 -24 -0006. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. . Motion by Member Masica, seconded by Member Housh to sustain the 2006 estimated market value of $772,000 for 6417 Biscayne Boulevard, PID 31- 117 -21 -13 -0015. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Motion by Member Swenson, seconded by Member Masica to sustain the 2006 estimated market value of. $276,400 for 6517 Ryan Avenue, PID 30- 028 -24 -23 -0081. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Motion by Mayor Hovland, seconded by Member Hulbert to sustain the 2006 estimated market value of $394,400, for 7308 Wooddale Avenue, PID 31- 028 -24 -24 -0081. Following discussion the motion maker and second withdrew the motion. Motion by Member Swenson seconded by Member Hulbert to reduce the 2006 estimated market value to $370,000, for 7308 Wooddale Avenue, PID 31- 028 -24 -24 -0081. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Motion by Member Swenson seconded by Member Hulbert to reduce the 2006 estimated market value to $346,500, for 5812 Hansen Road, PID 32- 117 -21-41 -0068. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Minutes/Board of Review/May 4, 2006 Motion carried. Motion by Member Masica, seconded by Member Housh to sustain the 2006 estimated market value of $563,900 for 7721 Marth Court, PID 08- 116 -21 -34 -0096. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Motion by Member Housh, seconded by Member Masica to sustain the 2006 estimated market value of $358,000 for 4810 Brookside Avenue, PID 28- 117 -21 -24 -0037. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Motion by Member Housh, seconded by Member Masica to reduce the 2006 estimated market value to $263,100 for 4300 Branson Street, PID 07- 028 -24-43 -0111. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Motion by Member Swenson, seconded by Member Hulbert to sustain the 2006 estimated market value of $1,126,600 for 4602 Drexel Avenue, PID 18- 028 -24 -12 -0136. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Housh to adjourn the meeting at 6:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, City Clerk i MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL MAY 2, 2006 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Hulbert, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Member Housh entered the meeting at 8:25 P.M. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Hulbert approving the Council Consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, .Hovland Motion carried. MAY 18 2006 PROCLAIMED AS "KENNETH DRAGSETH DAY" IN EDINA Mayor Hovland expressed thanks and appreciation to Edina School Superintendent Kenneth Dragseth for his nearly 39 years of service as a member of the Edina Public Schools staff and stated that he exemplifies the district's theme of "Edina Public Schools - Defining Excellence ". Member - Masica- made --a- motion - proclaiming May 18,- 2006, -as- "Kenneth - Dragseth -Day" in Edina. Member Hulbert seconded the motion. Ayes: Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. MERITORIOUS COMMENDATION BARS PRESENTED TO FIRE DEPARTMENT Chief Scheerer recognized Fire Department staff for actions during difficult yet successful rescues on July 19, 2005, in Plymouth and on October 21, 2005, in Minneapolis. The Fire Department has developed special operations teams which perform various difficult rescues. Members of the Fire Department receiving commendation bars are listed below. The Plymouth rescue participants were: Paramedic/ Firefighters: Pat Sandon Todd Porthan Kelvin Engen Todd Skatrud Brian Hanrahan Lieutenants: Craig Essig Jeff Siems Dave Schmitzer Captains: Jim Robinson Joel Forseth Assistant Fire Chief: Darrell Todd and for the Minneapolis rescue participants: Paramedic/ Firefighters: Dominic Hadzima Todd Porthan Kelvin Engen Brian Hanrahan Joe Struzyk Ryan Quinn Lieutenant: Jeff Siems Captain: Doug Bagley Assistant Fire Chief: Darrell Todd Page 1 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2006 RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -49 COMMENDING THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT UPON RECEIPT OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP AWARD Mayor Hovland commended the Edina Public Works Department with their recognition of the Environmental Leadership Award from the Road Salt Symposium at the annual event hosted by the Freshwater Society and Fortin consulting. Member Masica introduced the following resolution of commendation: RESOLUTION NO. 2006-49 COMMENDING THE EDINA PUBLIC WORKS .DEPARTMENT FOR THEIR ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP AWARD WHEREAS, the Edina Public Works Department is commissioned by the City to control ice and snow in the City of Edina; and WHEREAS, the Edina Public Works Department has one of the most efficient ice and snow control programs in the upper Midwest; and WHEREAS, the Road Salt Symposium is an annual event hosted by the Freshwater Society and Fortin Consulting; and WHEREAS, the 2006 Road Salt Symposium recently named the City of Edina the winner of the 2006 Environmental Leadership Award. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council, City staff, and all Edina residents hereby express their thanks and appreciation to EDINA PUBLIC WORKS for their work to keep our roadways navigable -iri an environmentally - conscious manner throughout the year. Dated this 2nd day of May 2006. Member Hulbert seconded the motion. Ayes: Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. NATIONAL PUBLIC WORKS WEEK PROCLAIMED - MAY 21 - 27, 2006 Mayor Hovland encouraged all citizens and civic organizations to recognize the contributions public works officials make every day to our health, safety, comfort and quality of life. Member Swenson made a motion proclaiming May 21- 27, 2006, as National Public Works Week in Edina. Member Masica seconded the motion. Ayes: Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. 'MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 18 2006 SPECIAL MEETING OF APRIL 18, 2006, AND BOARD OF APPEAL ' AND EQUALIZATION APRIL 17, 2006, APPROVED Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Hulbert approving the Minutes of .the Regular Meeting of April 18, 2006, Special Meeting of April 18, 2006, and the Board of Appeal and Equalization, April 17, 2006, as presented. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. Page 2 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2006 RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -52 APPROVING FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING - IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -451 - NINE MILE VILLAGE TOWNHOMES Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file.. Presentation by Engineer Engineer Houle indicated an out of the ordinary sequence had occurred with the proposed improvements for the Nine -Mile Village Townhomes watermain rehabilitation project, Improvement No. WM -451., Mr. Houle said that staff felt it was important to hold the final assessment hearing before the project began. He reminded the Council the project had been initiated by staff due to the poor conditions of the watermain throughout the development. Mr. Houle said the total proposed assessment would be $336,118.41 reflecting deletion of the electrical alternative and a $36,571.00 cash payment received from the Nine Mile Village Townhouse Association. He said the assessment amount for the 97 residential equivalent units was $3,465.14 with a 10 -year term for payment and an interest rate of 6.5 %. Mr. Houle said the first installment would be due with the 2007 payable taxes. Mr. Houle noted that construction would begin approximately in mid May with planned completion in late September of 2006. Member Masica asked for more information on the deleted electrical portion of the project. Mr. Houle explained the parking lot islands have light standards, which would be replaced, but residents had requested plug -ins added as an add - alternate to the bid. Because the bid was high, the plug -ins have been deleted from the project. Member Hulbert questioned if the stray electric current concerns have been rectified and would soil conditions in the area be' improved as part of the project. , Mr. Houle said that Xcel Energy was working on the stray current issue. He added the project would use plastic pipe with copper and not ductile iron so there would not be any issue with the soil condition. Mayor Hovland asked if the Agreement had been approved by the Association. Mr. Houle said yes, the Agreement had been signed by the Association Board they also passed a resolution endorsing the project. No one appeared to speak. Member Swenson made a motion to close the public hearing seconded by Member Hulbert. Ayes: Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Masica introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2006-52 A RESOLUTION LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR WM451 WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NINE MILE VILLAGE TOWNHOMES Page 3 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2006 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Edina City Council has met and heard and passed upon all written and oral objections to the proposed special assessments for improvements listed below: Watermain Improvement No. WM451- Nine Mile Village Townhomes BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Each special assessment as set forth in the special assessment rolls on file in the office of the City Clerk for each aforementioned improvement is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessments against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is herein found to be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the special assessments levied against it. 2. The special assessments shall be payable in equal installments, the first of said installments together with interest at a rate of 6.5% per annum, on the entire special assessments from the date hereof to December 31, 2007. To each subsequent installment shall be added interest at the above rate for one year on all unpaid installments. The number of such annual installments shall be as follows: HENNEPIN COUNTY INSTALLMENTS NAME OF IMPROVEMENT LEVY NO. NUMBER OF Watermain Improvement WM -451 Levy No. 16548 10 years 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of special assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the special assessments on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged in the entire special assessments is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution and they may, at any time .thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the special assessments remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31, of the year in which such payments are made. Such payment must be made before November 15, or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year, ified supplicate of these special assessments 4. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a cert to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such special assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. 5. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute an agreement between the City of Edina and Nine Mile Village Townhome Association. Adopted this 2nd day of May 2006. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -53 APPROVING IMPROVEMENT HEARING NO. A -210 - ALLEY ON JEFFERSON AND MADISON AVENUES Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Engineer Presentation Assistant Engineer Lillehaug indicated that in accordance with MN Statute 429, holding a public hearing was required for any public improvements. He reported a resident petition had been received from seven of sixteen affected properties requesting paving the alley between Jefferson and Madison Avenues. Mr. Lillehaug said the project was included as part of the City of Edina's five -year Capital Improvement Program to improve infrastructure Page 4 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2006 within the neighborhood. He said construction was proposed to begin during the summer of 2006. Mr. Lillehaug said the project would consist of paving the alley with bituminous pavement at an estimated cost of $30,000. He explained the estimated cost would not include costs for necessary utility improvements and repairs which will be funded through respective utility funds. Mr. Lillehaug said the proposed special assessment was estimated at $1,900 per residential equivalent unit (REU) and added staff felt the project feasible from an engineering standpoint. Member Swenson asked if the proposed alley would cause additional drainage issues for residents. Mr. Lillehaug said that he would look at the grading in the area and adjust it to improve the drainage for adjacent residents as much as possible. Mayor Hovland asked for further detail on the storm sewer in the project. Mr. Lillehaug said he anticipated adding another drain and tweaking the grading as needed. Member Masica asked the length of the repayment for the proposed improvement and if the utility poles would be re- located. Mr. Lillehaug explained it would have a five year term for repayment and that he was working with the utility company to relocate any poles needing to be moved. Member Hulbert asked if alleys were built to the same specifications as streets, could the City require the utility company to bury the lines and were aprons installed on driveways. Mr. Lillehaug said alleys were s ightly less heavy -than spree s arid - the -City cari request -the utility company bury the lines, but it's at the discretion of the utility company whether or not the line would be buried. He added that with concrete or bituminous driveways the alley would match up with an apron, but gravel would be left alone. Public Comment Pat Sundberg, 312 Madison Avenue stated she had several conversations with Mr. Lillehaug and expressed her satisfaction with the project and the service provided by the Engineering Department. Member Swenson made a motion to close the public hearing seconded by Member Masica. Ayes: Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Following a brief discussion Member Hulbert introduced the following resolution and moved approval: RESOLUTION NO. 2006-53 ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND ORDERING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. A -210 WHEREAS, the Edina City Council on the 4th day of April, 2006, fixed a date for a Council hearing on the proposed street reconstruction, Improvement No. A -210; and WHEREAS, ten days' mailed notice and two weeks' published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon on the 2nd day of May 2006, for Improvement No. A -210 Alley Improvement between Jefferson and Madison Avenue reconstructing the Page 5 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2006 existing bituminous pavement and base, repairing the storm sewer and grading where needed at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully advised of the pertinent facts, does hereby determine to proceed with the construction of said improvement, including all proceedings which may be necessary in eminent domain for the acquisition of necessary easements and rights hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as Improvement No. A -210 Alley Improvement between Jefferson and Madison Avenue reconstructing the existing bituminous pavement and base, repairing the storm sewer and grading where needed. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Improvement No. A -210 Alley Improvement between Jefferson and Madison Avenue reconstructing the existing bituminous pavement and base, repairing the storm sewer and grading where needed is hereby ordered as proposed with construction of the improvement to be completed during the 2006 construction season. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the feasibility report for Improvement No. A -210 is hereby received by the Edina City Council. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Engineer is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. The engineer shall cause plans and specifications to be prepared for the making of such improvement. Adopted this 2nd day of May 2006. Member Masica seconded the motion. Ayes: Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ------- - - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -54 APPROVING IMPROVEMENT HEARING A -211 - ALLEY ON WILLIAM AND HANKERSON AVENUES Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and placed on file. Engineer Presentation Mr. Lillehaug explained the proposed improvement was initiated via a resident petition from eleven of twenty -two affected properties. He said staff proposed the project as part of the Five -Year Capital Improvement Program to improve infrastructure within the neighborhood. Mr. Lillehaug said construction was proposed to begin during the summer of 2006. Mr. Lillehaug said the project would consist of paving the alley with bituminous pavement at an estimated cost of $44,000. He explained the estimated cost would not include costs for necessary utility improvements and repairs which will be funded through respective utility funds. Mr. Lillehaug said the proposed special assessment was estimated at $2,000 per residential equivalent unit (REU) and added staff felt the project feasible from an engineering standpoint. Member Swenson asked about improvements to the drainage and if a storm sewer were close enough to add additional drains. Mr. Lillehaug said the closest storm sewer was about one half -block away, but he believed staff could adequately address any necessary drainage issues. Public Comment Page 6 Minutes/Edina Ci!y Council/May 2, 2006 Cliff Klein, 51133 William Avenue, told the Council about the positive experience he had in working with staff to get this alley rebuilt. Member Hulbert made a motion to close the public hearing seconded by Member Masica. Rollcall: Ayes: Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Following a brief discussion, Member Swenson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2006-54 ACCEPT FEASIBILITY REPORT AND ORDERING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. A -211 WHEREAS, the Edina City Council on the 4th day of April, 2006, fixed a date for a Council hearing on the proposed street reconstruction, Improvement No. A -211; and WHEREAS, ten days' mailed notice and two weeks' published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon on the 2nd day of May 2006, for Improvement No. A -211 Alley Improvement between William and Hankerson Avenues reconstructing the existing bituminous pavement and base, repairing the storm sewer and grading where needed at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council has duly considered the views of -all persons interested, and_being fully advised of the pertinent facts, does hereby determine to proceed- with the construction of said improvement, including all proceedings which may be necessary in eminent domain for the acquisition of necessary easements and rights hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as Improvement No. A -211 Alley Improvement between William and Hankerson Avenues reconstructing the existing bituminous pavement and base, repairing the storm sewer and grading where needed BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Improvement No. A -211 Alley Improvement between William and Hankerson Avenues reconstructing the existing bituminous pavement and base, repairing the storm sewer and grading where needed is hereby ordered as proposed with construction of the improvement to be completed during the 2006 construction season. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the feasibility report for Improvement No. A -211 is hereby received by the Edina City Council. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Engineer is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. The engineer shall cause plans and specifications to be prepared for the making of such improvement. Adopted this 2nd day of May 2006. Member Masica seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -55 APPROVING IMPROVEMENT HEARING NO. A -223 - ALLEY ON BEARD AND ABBOTT AVENUES Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Page 7 Minutes/Edina City 2ouncil/May 2, 2006 Engineer Presentation Mr..Lillehaug explained the proposed improvement was initiated via a resident petition from five. of fourteen affected properties. Because fewer than 40% of the adjacent homeowners signed the petition, Mr. Lillehaug said the project would require a four fifths favorable vote of the Council to proceed. He said staff proposed the project as part of the Five -Year Capital Improvement Program to improve infrastructure within the neighborhood. Mr. Lillehaug said construction was proposed to begin during the summer of 2006. Mr. Lillehaug said the project would consist of paving the alley with bituminous pavement at an estimated cost of $21,000. He explained the estimated cost would not include costs for necessary utility improvements and repairs which will be funded through respective utility funds. Mr. Lillehaug said the proposed special assessment was estimated at $1,500 per residential equivalent unit (REU) and added staff felt the project feasible from an engineering standpoint. Member Masica asked if it were unusual to have an alley only partially through a block. Mr. Lillehaug said he could not give the history for the project area, but that the alley easement did not extend the entire length of the block. Member Hulbert asked if any fencing would be removed to redo the alley. Mr. Lillehaug explained none of the existing fences encroached into the alley easement. __ - - -- - Mayor - Hovland- asked if the concern expressed by resident Gail Rupp about drainage could be adequately addressed. Mr. Lillehaug said he would be evaluating the drainage and storm sewer and the project would not intensify any run off, but should rather improve the area. Mayor Hovland asked about the value of the proposed improvement to residents without garages facing the alley. Mr. Lillehaug said they have the opportunity to access the alley therefore, staff believed benefit existed for those properties. Public Comment Steve Cook, 5604 Abbott Avenue, explained he was the petition circulator for the alley and said he was thrilled to see it would be built. Arlene Cook, 5604 Abbott Avenue, explained that in 1951 there was a fight between the residents on Abbott and those on Beard. At that time a portion of the alley was abandoned, but the remainder was kept open. Member Hulbert made a motion closing the public hearing seconded by Member Masica. Rollcall: Ayes: Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Following a brief discussion, Member Masica introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2006-55 Page 8 Minutes/Edina City Council/May y2, 2006 ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND ORDERING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. A -223 WHEREAS, the Edina City Council on the 4th day of April, 2006, fixed a date for a Council hearing on the proposed street reconstruction, Improvement No. A -223; and WHEREAS, ten days' mailed notice and two weeks' published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon on the 2nd day of May 2006, for Improvement No. A -223 Alley Improvement between Beard and Abbott Avenues reconstructing the existing bituminous pavement and base, repairing the storm sewer and grading where needed at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully advised of the pertinent facts, does hereby determine to proceed with the construction of said improvement, including all proceedings which may be necessary in eminent domain for the acquisition of necessary easements and rights hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as Improvement No. A -223 Alley Improvement between Beard and Abbott Avenues reconstructing the existing bituminous pavement and base, repairing the storm sewer and grading where needed BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Improvement No. A -223 Alley Improvement between Beard and Abbott Avenues reconstructing the existing bituminous pavement and base, repairing the storm sewer and grading where needed is hereby ordered as proposed with construction of the improvement to be completed during the 2006 construction season. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the feasibility report for Improvement No. A -223 is hereby received by the Edina City Council. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Engineer is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. The engineer shall cause plans and specifications to be prepared for the making of such improvement. Adopted this 2nd day of May 2006. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. FIRST READING GRANTED TO ORDINANCE NO. 850 -A -29 PRELIMINARY REZONING PLANNED OFFICE DISTRICT 1 TO PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 2 - EDINA GATEWAY LLC - 4930 77m STREET WEST Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and placed on file. Member Housh entered the meeting at 8:25 P.M. Manager Hughes stated the property was located at 4930 West 77th Street and was presently zoned Planned Office District POD -1. He stated the proposal was to rezone the property to Planned Commercial District PCD -2 and also to issue a Conditional Use Permit for the property to permit housing as a conditional use as part of the project. Mr. Hughes explained the approval for the Edina Gateway LLC project would be a two -step process. He noted the conditional use permit and comprehensive plan would not be considered until .the final rezoning and final development plan were requested. Page 9 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2006 Mr. Hughes said the Planning Commission at their February 1, 2006, meeting, recommended preliminary rezoning approval to PCD -2 and also recommended approval of the requested conditional use permit. Those conditions included: final rezoning of the property to PCD -2; Watershed District Permits; preparation of Final Development Plan including landscaping plans addressing screening on the north side of the property; affordable housing participation requiring that at least three of the dwelling units fit into the classification of affordable housing; and final rezoning conditional upon the issuance of the conditional use permit for the residential portion of the project. He added the Transportation Commission also recommended the following conditions: Intersection and signal operational analysis would be conducted per their recommendation; and a sidewalk connection be made from the project down to West 77th Street. Mr. Hughes noted the plans before the Council included the Transportation Commissions requested sidewalk connection to West 77th Street. Proponent Presentation Jim Nelson, 7790 Lochmere Terrace, introduced the members of the Gateway LLC Project Team: Dan Green and Paul May, Architects, Miller Dunwiddie Architecture; Craig Vaughn, SRF Traffic Consultants; Ben Hartberg, Landscape Architect; Sara Harris, partner to Jim Nelson; and M.G. Cominksy, Edina Gateway LLC. Mr. Nelson reviewed the request of Edina Gateway LLC for rezoning from POD to PCD -2 with a conditional use permit for residential as part of a mixed use property. He said the retail portion would be approximately 15,000 square feet on the south side of the development; with the north side being an enclosed parking garage and 26 units of condominiums in three levels above the garage. Mr. Nelson said the retail will not be converted to condominiums, and Edina Gateway will retain ownership and lease the property to its retail tenants. Mr. Nelson said the proponent has made an effort to respond to the Planning Commission conditions. He said that they have included affordable housing units in their residential component. After meeting with the Edina Affordable Housing Coalition, their plan was to utilize a second mortgage program to provide the affordable units in conjunction with East Edina Housing Foundation. Mr. Nelson said the condos' price points ranged from $240,000 for one bedroom units to between $350,000 and $450,000 for the two bedroom units. He said there would be 21 one bed units and 15 two bedroom units. Mr. Nelson said the requested change of use was driven by the need to upgrade a forty -five year old class C office building. He said there was also a market in the surrounding area for the service retail and housing based upon a "Live Where You Work" concept. Mr. Nelson reported their planning process included: neighborhood meetings, held on December 15, 2005 and March 15, 2005; City Planning Staff meetings; one on one sessions with Planning Commission members; and some one on one neighbor meetings which led to the proponent developing an understanding of the needs of the neighbors abutting their site; for screening, privacy fencing and landscaping. It also fostered understanding of the neighbors as to what was being proposed for the site. Page 10 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2006 Paul May, Miller Dunwiddie Architecture, using a graphic reviewed, in detail the updated site plan and the requested change of use as follows: Planning Rationale • To provide a zoning and use transition, blending between residential and commercial uses at a unique location. • To bring housing options to an area of Edina where living and working in the same neighborhood can be possible • To innovate within the bounds of zoning guidelines. (residential within PCD =2) and bring mixed -use redevelopment to an area of the City and a property that has been showing its age • To provide retail use alternatives in close proximity to an underserved population Zoning Request POD -1 PCD -2 • Rezone site from POD -1 (Planned Maximum Height 501. 50' Office District) to PCD -2 (Planned Minimum Setback 50' 50' Commercial District) Residential Use None CUP • Conditional Use Permit for Residential within PCD -2 • Reduction in Parking Setback at West and South property boundary • Proof -of- Parking for ten (10) spaces on South — Dan - Green,- Miller - Dunwiddie Architecture; - reviewed the design °features of the - proposed project using graphics as follows: Design Features of the Building • Mixed -Use: Residential above Commercial • Commercial Retail/ Restaurant Development • Floors 2-4 have a stepped profile to reduce height impacts and shadows while maximizing views and light for residents and neighbors • Garden roof on second level to reduce storm -water runoff, reduce impervious surface . and provide a visual amenity to residents and neighbors • Residential parking located internal to building • Major areas of parking for retail are located on the West and South sides of the building • Service entry and trash room located away from residential • Screening between properties utilizing a combination of privacy fencing and landscaping • Fire Lane - flexible outdoor space created for residents using innovative surface materials • Designed access to minimize traffic flow on the north side of. site • Potential location of proof of parking Craig Vaughn, SRF Traffic Consultant reviewed the traffic study conducted as follows: • Study objective was to determine the traffic impacts associated with the proposed redevelopment and make recommendations necessary to mitigate traffic issues Page 11 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2006 • Developed trip generation estimates for the proposed development using industry standard trip generation rates • Developed trip distribution patterns based on historical traffic volume data within the project study area • Conducted an operations analysis at four key intersections during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours for existing, future no build and future build conditions Trip Generation Estimates • Applied the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) trip generation methodology • Land use type and size were approximated in order to account for a conservative estimate • Resultant trip generation estimates were: • A.M. Peak Hour = 35 in trips / 55 out trips • P.M. Peak Hour = 75 in trips / 25 out trips • *Existing land use was currently generating approximately 40 A.M. peak hour trips and 45 P.M. peak hour trips Trip Distribution Estimates • Reviewed historical count data along the regional and local roadway network • Reviewed existing turning movement count data • Determined the following trip distribution percentages: — TH 100 (North) = 40 percent — TH 100 (South) = 30 percent — W 77th Street (East) = 20 percent, — W 77th Street (West) =10 percent Traffic Operation Analysis • Existing condition: all key intersections currently operated at acceptable levels of service No build condition: all key intersections will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service • Build condition: all key intersections will operate at acceptable levels of service, with signal timing modifications at three key intersections along W. 77th Street Traffic Summary • Study objective was to determine the traffic impacts associated with the proposed development and make recommendations necessary to mitigate traffic issues • Redevelopment of the existing office site will result in approximately 90 a.m. and 100 p.m. peak hour additional vehicle trips. However, the existing land use has the potential to generate approximately 70 a.m. and 65 p.m. peak hour vehicle trips • The adjacent roadway network will operate acceptably with minor mitigation measures (i.e., signal timing improvements) • TDMP Member Masica asked whether the proposed eight foot fence would be allowed under Edina Code, for further detail on a "French balcony ", exterior materials proposed, drainage from the proposed "garden roof', the location of catch basins, how many affordable units were proposed, and what if any variances were being requested. Page 12 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2006 Mr. Hughes explained Edina Code restricted fences to six feet in front yard so the proposed sideyard fence was allowed by Code. He also explained the variances requested for the property related to parking setback from the Highway 100 ramp and also parking quantity which the proponent proposed to satisfy with a proof of parking agreement. Mr. Green explained French balconies were very shallow allowing only a door to be open, but no area for seating or outdoor activities. He added the building was more conceptual currently, but the upper level of the building was proposed to be pre -case cement and glass with the base of the building glazed with windows and aluminum throughout the entire structure. Mr. May explained the "green roof" would drain just the same as a regular roof into storm drains located as required by the City on the property. He pointed out the locations using a graphic of the site plan. Mr. Nelson stated at the current time three units were designated as affordable units, but that he did not want to limit or stretch the project at this time noting that possible more units could be affordable. Member Swenson s questions included: the location where trash will be kept and picked up, were the common areas on the green roof for condo residents only, and would the proponent guarantee no drive through restaurants on the site. Mr. May used the graphic to demonstrate the circulation on the west and east sides pointing out the trash storage location and how it would be accessed to be removed. He added the upper patios on the green roof would be used only by condo residents and their guests. Mr. May assured the Council there would be no drive through restaurants on the site. - Member Housh asked about the proposed price points of the unit, what type of retail was proposed, how large a restaurant would be located in the retail area, and commented that when the Final Plans were submitted the Council's expectation was that the project would be built exactly as depicted on the plans. Mr. May explained the price points would range from about $240,000 to $450,000 with the one bedroom units at the lower end and the two bedroom units at the upper end. Mr. Nelson said that he expected the retail to include dry cleaner, UPS Store, and a small restaurant offering soup, salads and sandwiches. He added they did not intend to house a drive through or serve alcohol. Member Hulbert asked if the fire lane was required or optional and also for more detail on the "green roof ". Mr. May said the fire lane would be used by emergency and service vehicles. Mr. Hartberg explained a green roof would have an irrigation system below the soil. It would be designed to hold rain water and have plantings and patio areas for use by residents. He added it could hold storm water from semi intensive rains of between approximately four inches up to twelve inches. Mayor Hovland's questions included: further detail on the use of green roofs; the location of the proposed fence on the north side of the project; where the plantings were proposed; who would be eligible for the. "affordable" housing units; and whether any qualifiers could be added to favor Edina residents receiving the affordable units. Mr. May said it was the goal of the developer to have the green roof manage up to twelve inches of rainfall allowing the water to be filtered two to three times before it flows into the catch basins and storm sewer. He said the north side fence will be built behind the retaining wall and the landscape plantings would be on the Gateway property. Mr. Nelson said he believed persons who Page 13 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2006 qualify under the Metropolitan Council's guidelines would be eligible for the affordable housing units. He added they have been working with the East Edina Housing Foundation and some local banks. Mr. Hughes added that it was not possible to place local restrictions on affordable housing so only Edina residents were eligible, .but that preference could be given to Edina residents who qualified for the units. Public Comment Betty Conners, 7504 West Shore Drive, asked about the height of the retaining wall. Ms. Connors said that she was a walker and would like to continue walking without. jumping down a four and a half foot retaining wall. Doug Mayo, 6041 Tower Avenue, Edina Housing Initiative, commented on how expensive housing has become in Edina. Mr. Mayo noted the proponent has agreed to provide between three and nine affordable housing units in the project. He urged approval of the project. Jeff Hugget, 4008 Woodland Drive, member of the Edina Housing Task Force, also spoke in support of the project and urged approval. Member Masica made a motion to close the public hearing, seconded by Member Hulbert. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. -Member- -Masica- commented the-proponent had done -a -good job working with the neighbors in satisfying their concern. She felt the project filled a need in the community and stated her intention to support the project Member Hulbert concurred with Member Masica. She added she felt the Council needed to be careful with what was approved next to residential areas. Member Hulbert said she generally supported the project, but asked that there be no drive - throughs or any liquor license of any type be allowed on the project. Member Housh said he agreed with previous speakers in his appreciation of the developer's efforts to work with the neighbors. He said he was not sure about limiting the site to no liquor licenses of any type. Member Swenson said she felt the timing of the project was good, she agreed she liked the way the developer -worked with the neighbors, the green roof was very timely and a condition of approval must include that no drive - through would be allowed on the site. Mayor Hovland stated he also liked the project and the collaborative effort the developer and neighbors brought forward which ultimately yielded a better project. He praised the project for its inclusion of affordable housing and the green roof. Mayor Hovland cautioned the developer, that when they brought forward final plans they must be very specific and intend to build their project exactly per the plans presented to the Council. Mayor Hovland supported the rezoning and adding a condition of no drive - throughs. He asked staff to review the necessary conditions. Page 14 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2006 Mr. Hughes reviewed the conditions as follows: 1) Setback variance from Highway 100; 2) Proof of Parking Variance; 3) No drive - through any place on the site; 4) Final Rezoning to PCD -2; 5) Watershed District Permits; 6) Preparation of Final Development Plan including landscaping plans addressing screening on the north side of the property; 7) Affordable housing participation requiring that at least three of the dwelling units fit into the classification of affordable housing; 8) Conditional Use Permit; and 9) Intersection and signal operational analysis to analysis to be conducted per the Transportation Commission. Mr. Hughes and Mr. Gilligan said it would not be possible to put conditions on the zoning so prohibiting liquor licenses from the site could not be a condition of the requested rezoning. Member Swenson made a motion to made a motion to grant First Reading to Ordinance No. 850 -A -29 conditioned upon: 1) Setback variance from Highway 100; 2) Proof of Parking Variance; 3) No drive- through any place on the site; 4) Final Rezoning to PCD -2; 5) Watershed District Permits; 6) Preparation of Final Development Plan including landscaping plans addressing screening on the north side of the property; 7) Affordable housing participation requiring that at least three of the dwelling units fit into the classification of affordable housing, 8) Conditional Use Permit, and 9) Intersection and signal operational analysis to analysis to be conducted per the Transportation Commission. Member Housh seconded the motion. Rollcall Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland - -- - - Motion- carr- ied-- ______ __ -_ _ -- - -- - - - -- - - -- - -- — -- - - - - -- - - — - - -- - RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -56 ADOPTED GRANTING FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN TARGET CORPORATION - 7000 YORK AVENUE SOUTH Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and placed on file. Mr. Hughes explained the request before the Council was for Final Development Plan for Target Corporation at 7000 York Avenue South. He said the property was properly zoned PCD -3 for the proposed use. Mr. Hughes said Edina Code required the proponent to obtain a Final Development Plan for the size of the proposed expansion. He reported the project had been reviewed by the Planning Commission on March 1, 2006, and again on March 29, 2006. The Planning Commission at their March 29, 2006, meeting, recommended denial of the requested Final Development Plan. He noted the Council had received their reasons for denial which included: proponent's lack of housing, disappointment with building design and exterior building materials and no evidence of a hardship to support the requested variance. Mr. Hughes reported the Transportation Commission reviewed the Target Expansion Impact Study and TDM Plan at their December 15, 2005, meeting and approved the study and TDM plan with conditions. He said that Alice Roberts Davis would lead off the Target presentation. Proponent Presentation Alice Roberts Davis, Real Estate Manager, Target Corporation, said she is responsible for the project. Ms. Davis said a Super Target in the community would be a great amenity due to its Page 15 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2006 convenient location, convenience of allowing guests to complete more shopping in less time. She pointed out Target was a great corporate citizen, being one of the most philanthropic corporations in the world. Ms. Roberts Davis said Target has given about $100,000 to Edina Public Schools. She added the proposed Target redevelopment represented a major re- investment in the community. Ms. Roberts Davis said the site would also be improved with additional parking, landscaping and green space will be increased, truck circulation along the promenade will be eliminated, and W. 70th Street will be made more pedestrian friendly. Ms. Roberts Davis said Target understood the importance of the promenade to the community. She said Target has contacted engineers working on the promenade design in an effort to work with them to present harmonious architecture, landscaping and theme. She said the design presented had incorporated many of the Planning Commission comments and would be totally unique to Edina. Ms. Roberts Davis said'according to the Greater Southdale Area Study was originally a retail corridor with the redevelopment Target found there would be no vehicular access making retail not an option, so the focus turned to housing. She said the more Target looked at housing; they found it to be an incompatible use with their retail operation. They feared they might be exposing themselves to restrictions for their operation such as: truck deliveries, hours of operation and lighting. Ms. Roberts Davis said that Target's primary business was retailing and that housing, in the manner suggested, could impose quality of life issues for adjacent residents due to the accompanying noise, glare, vibration, and truck deliveries that occur with their business. Ms. Roberts Davis said design issues such as how would they exit the rear of the Target store; how would emergency vehicles access the units at the rear; how would overflow roof water be handled; and also snow loading issues. She said they also did not know how they would design their building to accommodate future housing. Ms. Roberts Davis said that for all of those reasons, Target proceeded with the store as. per their final plans and she asked the Council to favorably consider their Final Development Plan so they could proceed with construction in January of 2007 for an opening in 2007. Ms. Roberts Davis introduced John Dietrich of RLK to review the site plan. John Dietrich, RLK Kussisto Landscape Architects, said he also had Vernon Swing, Senior Transportation Planner available for questions. He said he would review the site elements, and Aimes Gilmore, Senior Design Architect for Target Corporation, would review the architectural elements. Mr. Dietrich said the proponent was requesting Final Development Plans for a reconstructed Super Target Store to be located at 7000 York Avenue South. He said that within that approval there was also a request for a parking variance reducing the required parking ratio on the site to four stalls per 1,000 feet of building from five per 1,000 feet of building. Mr. Dietrich said the plan was to totally redevelop the 14.8 acre site with substantial investment on all the corners of the property in order to provide Edina citizens a state of the art, modern Super Target facility in place of the existing 30 -year old structure that was Page 16 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2006 operation and functioning, while at the same time providing an enhanced public realm on all sides of the property. He said the site was currently developed with • 169,000 square feet of building - 155,000 square feet the Target Store • Building approximate 50 feet from the west property line of the proposed promenade Service Drive accessed from W. 70th Street and proceeds south was ten feet from the proposed promenade. • Existing Variance on site allowing the parking ratio be less than the code requirement of 5 spaces per 1,000 of retail space. • Impervious ratio of site at approximately 85% • Green space at approximately 15% • Parking located on the north, south and east facades of the building and currently between W. 70f Street existed below grade approximately 4-4.5 feet • Access points exist at the northwest corner to West 70th Street and one to West 70th Street offset from the Galleria drive, one on York Avenue and two accesses on Hazelton Road • Sidewalks exist adjacent to the curb lines on W 70th, York Avenue and Hazelton Road • 30 year old site ready for redevelopment. Mr. Dietrich outlined the proposed re- development that would include: • 196,000 square foot building - Super Target with soft lines, merchandise and a full service grocery store • Parking Lot has been redesigned to be artfully landscaped throughout the parking -- - area- with`individual- trees = clustered, green'space, corridorswith sweeping curves - • Parking has been removed from the north and west sides of the site • Service drive has been removed from the west side of the building • West side of building now a landscaped area that will flow and be integrated into the promenade design as it progresses • Main site access off of West 70th Street moved westerly to be aligned with the Galleria - received Transportation Commission in December 2005 • Target will pay pro -rated share if West 70th Street traffic signal becomes necessary • Loading facility located at southwest corner of site will have a full height screen wall, will be bermed and heavily landscaped to screen it from the promenade and Hazelton Road • Uninterrupted green swath 130 feet wide from the read of the Target store to the west side of the promenade (50 feet on the Target property, 80 feet of public space) Mr. Dietrich said the plans as shown was their intent for the land adjacent to the promenade, but Target will work with the City's architects to ensure a seamless design of the promenade. He reiterated the amenities planned for the Target walkways, which will be curvilinear, benches, pedestrian lights, trash receptacles, artists plazas, gathering spaces. The promenade will move north from 70f and then turn and follow the entire north fagade of Target. Mr. Dietrich explained the redesign .of the front parking area, describing how it has been improved: • Promote two way 90 degree parking stalls • Access off West 7001 and Hazelton Road and York Avenue primary access points Page 17 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2006 • Service will access and exit site on Hazelton Road with truck turn around area • Front sidewalk area will become plaza area • Accessibility to Handicapped stalls • Building extend north to W 70th Street with pedestrian terrace at the corner of W 70th and a colonnade from the building • Site will be 25% more green space than existing plan (20% of the site will be green & 5% will be hard scape pedestrian gathering areas) • Landscape areas within parking area will create a series of over story landscape trees to shade the area and break up the parking • Plan depends upon granting of parking variance which will allow 800 parking stall on site (732 stalls exist on the site) • Target has a year long study on parking needs and results indicate 800 spaces adequate • Target's investment in the public realm, increased green space, financial burden of building a parking structure reasons to grant variance • Site will meet all City Code requirements regarding setbacks, engineering Eames Gilmore, Target Sr. Design Architect, 7304 Tara Road, used graphics and described in detail the proposed plan for the new Target store. He explained the various components of the store, including the location of the grocery area, general merchandise area, stock room, support /office area, food /coffee bar areas. Mr. Gilmore displayed photos of the various areas of the proposed store. He said it would be the precursor to the 2009 image of Super Target stores to be built. Mr. Gilmore reviewed the elevations that would be seen from the exterior as follows: • York Avenue - front of store, grocery area on left, general merchandise on right • Signature element, colonnade extending from entrance to W 70th corner plaza • Exterior materials high quality - pre - finished metals, stone wainscot, champagne metal, large areas of glass (20 ft) at each entry which will glow at night; ■ Food area glass at the tower, Starbucks circular window left of the grocery entry; animated display windows along the walkway, more glass and projecting canopies along walk, landscaping ■ General merchandise entry, office with clear story glass and another round window • Hazelton Road - Uninhabited retail, vertical fin elements to give fagade verticality, projecting metal wall layers, animated windows, berming will hide most of the dock activity. • West 70th Street - Colonnade coming out to plaza, urban display window feature to be lit at night (20 feet high X 24 feet wide), changed grade to improve path circulation; projecting wall layers with vertical fin elements to add interest to fagade, more display windows • Rear Facade Adjacent to Promenade rolling berms (idea for promenade), vertical fin elements, raised projecting metal layer (similar to picture windows), adding 50 feet of green space to promenade, at the right loading dock screen wall (12 feet in height) fully screening dock activity. Page 18 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2006 Mr. Gilmore said that as the promenade design progressed they would adjust their design to make it seamless and compatible; suggesting that perhaps the red fins would become lattice. He asked that the final approval reflect this ability to work with the promenade design. Mayor Hovland questions included: what makes the proposed Super Target unique over other in the area, was Target willing in "tweaking' the west facade to make it compatible with the promenade, was Target able and willing to restrict construction traffic from West 70th Street and to attempt to eliminate delivery traffic from West 70th Street, explain the undue hardship requiring a proof of parking variance, and would the requested parking variance require a proof of parking agreement. Mayor Hovland asked about placement of bicycle racks on the site. Would Target assume responsibility for all necessary improvement on the Target property relative to sidewalks, landscaping, etc. Mr. Gilmore explained Target had taken the comments from the Planning Commission and updated their design making it more cutting edge and modern. It was different than anything else built in the Metro area. He said Target would welcome the opportunity to work with the City's architect to design a seamless flow from the Target fagade to the promenade, including modifying the building fagade and the landscaping plan. Mr. Gilmore said the construction traffic can be mandated to use France and York Avenue and Target could attempt to map the delivery route to eliminate neighborhood truck traffic. Mr. Hughes explained the existing Target store had a proof of parking agreement that would need modification if the Council approved the Final Development Plan requested. Mr. Dietrich said that Target conducted exhaustive studies demonstrating the code requirement for parking was not necessary. He said that the industry standard set by ULI supported Target's studies. Mr. Dietrich added the existing Target store had a parking variance and they were adding 70 plus spaces with the redesign. Mr. Dietrich said that Edina Code required the placement of bicycle racks. Mr. Gilmore said they were planning on paying for all site improvements. Mayor Hovland asked staff what type of language would be needed to formalize the Target promise to work with the City on the promenade design. Mr. Hughes suggested that a condition to participate in the design efforts with the city and agreement to modify the Target landscaping and grading plans and fagade treatments to coincide with the promenade design be added to any approval. Mr. Gilmore said Target would agree to such a condition. Member Masica asked the following questions: could Target semis be routed off of West 70th Street from Hwy 100 and be made to use either TH 62 or I -494 to France and York Avenues, how did Target proposed to work with the City's architect in developing a seamless interplay with the promenade; and what would the grocery element add to parking needs. Mr. Gilmore said the construction traffic can be mandated to use France and York Avenue and Target could attempt to map the delivery route to eliminate neighborhood truck traffic. Mr. Dietrich said he expected to meet with the City's architect and as the promenade was developed, detailed drawing could be developed incorporating the City's and Target's sides of the promenade. Mr. Dietrich said the grocery element would add increase trips to the Target store by approximately seven to nine percent. Vernon Swing from RFK elaborated Page 19 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2006 that the parking dynamic might increase by seven percent, but the trip generation was anticipated to be roughly the same. Member Housh asked if the fagade facing the promenade could there possibly be illumination of some pieces of art similarly to the illumination proposed on 70th Street. Mr. Gilmore replied it might be better to incorporate some uplit landscaped areas with art, but they would investigate this issue. Member Swenson commented that while it may have appeared the Council did not want Target in the community, that was not the case, but she cautioned Target, the Council will be watching that they perform on both their design plans and their intent to incorporate the promenade design into Target's site. She asked if there were emergency doors in the back of the building; if the bus stop was proposed to be covered, how would employees without cars access the site, asked about for further detail on the exterior materials. She asked whether housing on the other side of the promenade would present design issues for Target. Member Swenson asked if Target Corporation has ever done anything with public art. Mr. Gilmore responded to the questions and said the current design has been upgraded and updated. He reiterated Target's intention to become a partner with the City and their architect in the promenade design. If the design for the promenade places housing across from Target then there will most likely be some modifications to accommodate that change. Mr. Gilmore said there will be emergency exists on the rear of the building to meet fire code. He said they would be more towards the middle of the building and they will use landscaping and architecture to soften the look. Mr. Gilmore displayed the site plan showing the location of the emergency doors, stating there will be one eight foot door in the middle and then near the dock there will be a door for small trucks and UPS. Mr. Gilmore said many employees use the bus and walk from Southdale to Target. Some employees come by car, some get dropped off. Mr. Houle said that staff was working with MTC to review possible layouts for bus stops on West 70th Street. Mr. Gilmore displayed the proposed material boards and described their location on the proposed building. Mr. Gilmore said that across the country Target has been involved in several ventures with public art, pointing out this involvement with the. Walker, that they have sponsored public art and have a large public art component in their downtown Minneapolis headquarters. Public Comment JoEllen Deever, 7605 Oaklawn Avenue, spoke in favor of the proposed Target redevelopment and urged approval of the project. Gene Persha, 6917 Cornelia Drive, spoke in favor of the proposed Target redevelopment and urged approval of the project. He also spoke regarding a bike path on York Avenue. Susan Tucker, 5200 Meadow Ridge, gave her support for the proposed Target project. Colin Doherty, 4606 Wooddale Avenue, said he was part of the Target team and spoke in favor of the proposed redevelopment project. Page 20 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2006 Vernon Hansbury, 7333 Gallagher Drive, spoke in favor of the proposed redevelopment of Target. He said he was excited about the Super Target being built in Edina. Steve Makredes, 4916 West Sunnyslope, stated he was a Target employee as a construction manager. Mr. Makredes said there were many Target employees in the community and he urged approval of the proposed redevelopment. Chris Kenny, 6735 Emerson Avenue, Richfield, stated she was a part time Target employee, she used the bus to commute to Target and she urged approval of the proposed redevelopment. Member Masica asked the plan for enclosing the loading dock area from the promenade. Mr. Gilmore said there would be a twelve foot wall with the loading dock sloped down about four feet. He said the berming along Hazelton buffers the view both east and west. Landscape planting also adds to the screening. Mr. Dietrich said that additional berming could be added if necessary. Member Swenson asked how many loading docks were planned. Mr. Gilmore said there would be two docks for semis, one enclosed compactor, and one dock for smaller vehicles. Member Housh made a motion to close the public hearing, seconded by Member Masica. Rollcall: Ayes:--Housh;-Hulbert;-Masica Swenson; Hovland -- - - - -- - - -- -- - - Motion carried. Member Housh explained the firm he works for had business dealings with the Target Corporation and he inquired whether a conflict of interest needed to be considered. Attorney Gilligan said upon investigation, he believed no conflict existed. Mayor Hovland said that Target has demonstrated their wonderful corporate citizenship with the plans presented. He complimented the development team on the project presented to the Council. Mayor Hovland said a key development issue was the relationship between the elevation of the store to the promenade. He indicated his intent to support the project. Mayor Hovland said the conditions he would impose would include: build according to the final plans and specifications presented at the May 2, 2006 meeting, Signalization cost sharing 50 %, bicycle rack be addressed, intersection, entrances, roadways, sidewalk reconstruction all to be at Target's cost; previously stated language agreeing to modify plans to be consistent with City promenade, proof of parking agreement, no construction traffic on West 70th Street, and no delivery traffic on West 70th Street, Member Masica commented she liked the parking lot design. She supported the Mayor's deletion of truck from West 70+1, Street and indicated her intention to support the project. Member Masica asked the red fins on the back of the stores be reviewed. Member Hulbert agreed with the Mayor and Member Masica and reiterated her desire to keep trucks off of West 70f Street. Page 21 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2006 Mayor Hovland introduced the following resolution and moved its approval: RESOLUTION NO., 2006 -56 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN TARGET CORPORATION 7000 YORK AVENUE SOUTH BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL, the Final Development Plan and for Target Corporation, 7000 York Avenue South is hereby approved with the following conditions: 1. The use of plans and materials as per the plan presented to the Edina City Council at their meeting on May 2, 2006, 2. Bicycle rack location to be formalized; 3. Target to pay 50% of any necessary signalization which shall be constructed per Edina Traffic Engineer Steve Lillehaug, February 6, 2006 memorandum, 4. Intersection, entrances, roadways, sidewalk reconstruction all to be at Target's cost, and shall be constructed per Edina Traffic Engineer Steve Lillehaug, February 6, 2006 memorandum; 5. Target will participate with the City and their promenade architect on the design of the promenade; 6. Target agrees to modify their landscape and grading plans for the rear fagade to be consistent with promenade; 7. Target agrees to modify the rear fagade facing the promenade to coincide with the promenade design, 9. Watershed District Permits; 10. No construction Traffic allowed access to the site via West 70th Street; and 11. No store deliveries shall use West 70th Street to access the site. Passed and adopted this 2nd day of May, 2006. Member Hulbert seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *HEARING DATE SET OF MAY 16, 2006, FINAL REZONING AND FINAL PLAT, BROWNSTONES ON FRANCE - NOONAN CONSTRUCTION/KINGDOM PROPERTIES - 5200300 FRANCE AVENUE Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Hulbert setting May 16, 2006, for hearing date for Final Rezoning and Final Plat of Brownstones on France - Noonan Construction/Kingdom Properties, 5200/5300 France Avenue. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. CONCERN OF RESIDENTS No residents appeared to speak. *BID AWARDED - CONTRACT NO. ENG 06 -5 - CRESTON HILLS NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PROTECT Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Hulbert approving the award of bid for Contract No. Eng 06 -5 - Creston Hills Neighborhood Roadway Improvement Project to recommended low bidder, Hardrives, Inc., at $1,893,013.30. Page 22 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2006 Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. AWARD OF BID FOR CONTRACT NO. ENG 06 -3 - NINE MILE VILLAGE WATERMAIN REHABILITATION PROTECT, IMPROVEMENT PROTECT NOS, WM -451 AND WM459 Engineer Houle explained the project for the Nine Mile Village Watermain Rehabilitation Project was ordered on March 6, 2006. Three bids were received with G.L. Contracting the low bidder. Mr. Houle said staff recommended award of the bid. Member Swenson made a motion for award of bid for Contract No. Eng 06 -3, Nine -Mile Village and 59th Street Watermain Rehabilitation Project, Improvement Project Nos. WM- 451 and WM -459, to recommended low bidder. G.L. Contracting, Inc., at $1,409,645.60. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. TEMPORARY INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE FOR 50TH & FRANCE BUSINESS ASSOCIATION APPROVED FOR EDINA ART FAIR, TUNE 2-4, 2006 Chief Siitari indicated that' the 50th & France Business and Professional Association applied for a temporary on -sale intoxicating liquor license to .sell beer and wine at the Art Fair on June 2-4, 2006. The Association has also applied for a Special Permit to use the Edina 5 -0 Municipal parking lot as the location for the licensed premises. Background checks on the Association show they are eligible for the license to be issued. Mr. Siitari explained the size of the beer garden has been downsized from previous years and the stage has been moved outside. The stage venue has changed from live music to fashion, etc. Two Edina police officers will be present during the Fair and he said historically the event has been well run. Staff recommends the license and permit be approved. Member Masica questioned whether the location of the Art Center booth has been resolved. Ms. Rosalie Lee, 5011, and France Business Association noted that the Art Center, Community Center and Historical Society locations have been designated spaces. She added that Edina Community Education had declined a booth at this time. No residents appeared to speak to the issue. Member Masica made a motion to close the public hearing, seconded by Member Swenson. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Hulbert made a motion approving issuance of the temporary intoxicating liquor license for the 50th & France Business and Professional Association for the Edina Art Fair, June 24, 2006, and the Special Permit for use of City property in conjunction with the temporary liquor license, noting the Association had made space available to the Edina Art Center, Edina Senior Center, Edina Chemical Health Partners and Edina Historical Society. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Page 23 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2006 Motion carried. TEMPORARY BEER LICENSE APPROVED FOR OUR LADY OF GRACE CHURCH Mr. Hughes informed the Council Our Lady of Grace Church applied for a temporary beer license for their 60th Anniversary dance to be held May 20, 2006. The dance will take place between 7:30 P.M. and 11:30 P.M. City Code allows non - profit organizations to obtain a temporary beer license to sell 3.2 beer on -sale for this type of event. Our Lady of Grace has filed the necessary application, provided insurance information and paid the fee. Similar events have been held in the past without incident. He stated staff recommended approval of the requested temporary license. Member Masica made a motion to approve a temporary on -sale beer license to Our Lady of Grace Church for its 601h Anniversary Dinner, May 20, 2006. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. APPOINTMENT MADE TO ART CENTER BOARD Mayor Hovland shared his intention to appoint George Hadjiyanis to fill the vacancy on the Art Center Board. Mayor Hovland made a motion appointing George Hadjiyanis to the Art Center Board for a term to February 1, 2009. Member Masica seconded the motion. . .______._Ayes:_.Housh,_Hulber-t, Masica,_ Swenson ,_Hovland_________________ Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -48 ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Swenson made a motion approving the following resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 2006-48 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Donation to the Braemar Memorial Fund for future Golf Course equipment purchases as follows: Edward Izmirian $25.00 Edina Women's Golf Association $50.00 Dated: May 2, 2006 Member Hulbert seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 24 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2006 *CHANGE ORDER PURCHASE TO GLADSTONE CONSTRUCTION AS PART OF THE SOUTH VIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION APPROVED Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Hulbert approving the change order for a window, framing and trim for the South View Middle School gymnasium construction to Gladstone Construction for $588.50. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. . *RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -50 - NO PARKING APPROVED FOR EDEN AVENUE FROM ARCADIA TO VERNON AVENUES Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Hulbert approving the following resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 2006-50 RELATING TO PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON S.A.P. NO. 120-163-04 (EDEN AVENUE) WHEREAS, the ' City of Edina has planned the improvements of MSAS 163 (Eden Avenue) from Arcadia Avenue to Vernon Avenue; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina will be expending Municipal Street Aid Funds on the improvement of this street, and WHEREAS, these improvements do not provide adequate width for parking on both sides of the street, and approval of the proposed construction as a Municipal State Aid Street project must therefore be conditioned upon certain parking restrictions. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS THEREBY RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina shall ban the parking of motor vehicles on MSAS 163 (Eden Avenue) on both sides of the street from Arcadia Avenue to Vernon Avenue, at all times. Passed and adopted this 2nd day of May, 2006. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -51 - 'TWO WHEELS TO TOWN' BICYCLE INITIATIVE APPROVED Member Masica made a motion, seconded by Member Hulbert approving the following resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 2006-51 RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR TWO WHEELS TO TOWN (TWTT) BICYCLY INITIATIVE WHEREAS, the City of Edina is a partner in a four city collaborative (Two Wheels To Town) including the cities of Bloomington, Richfield and Minneapolis, in an effort to promote bicycle transportation in the Southwest Metro area; and WHEREAS, the ultimate goal of TWTT is to help the residents of the four cities understand that bicycles can be a real alternative for daily transportation, and WHEREAS, the City of Munster, Germany is a leader in bicycle transportation resulting in cleaner air, quieter streets and a stronger sense of community and serves as the model and inspiration for the TWTT initiative; and WHEREAS, the TWTT bicycle advocacy team has asked that the City of Edina support their efforts to urge residents to utilize greater bicycle transportation opportunities to achieve the same type of benefits in Edina. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina does hereby: 1. Support TWI°T's mission and objectives, and 2. Shall consider making application to become a Bicycle- Friendly Community (BFC), and Page 25 Minutes/Edina Cif Council/May 2, 2006 3. Commit to making employees aware of the City's support for such efforts, and 4. Commit to making use of a limited amount of City's staff time and marketing efforts to gain media attention to the TWTT initiative. Passed and adopted this. 2nd day of May, 2006. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Member Masica made a motion and Member Hulbert seconded the motion approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated April 19, 2006, and consisting of 32 pages: General Fund $235,742.51; Communications Fund $3,500.74; Working Capital Fund $962.76; Construction Fund $5,807.15; Art Center Fund $18,718.69; Golf Dome Fund $18,402.67; Aquatic Center Fund $1,286.52; Golf Course Fund $19,909.19; Ice Arena Fund $13,063.33; Edinborough/ Centennial Lakes Fund $21,915.45; Liquor Fund $141,014.04, Utility Fund $345,666.50; Storm Sewer Fund $957.21; Recycling Fund $33,958.00; PSTF Fund $5,053.66; TOTAL $865,958.42; and for approval of payment of claims dated April 26, 2006, and consisting of 26 pages: General Fund $193,998.48; Communications Fund $23,758.46; General Debt Service Fund $750.00; Working Capital Fund $396,361.40; Art Center Fund $2,211.55; Golf Dome Fund $65.68; Aquatic Center Fund $484.06; Golf Course Fund $33,722.48; Ice Arena Fund $4,294.28; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $19,648.62, Liquor Fund $180,743.06; Utility Fund $42,667.45; PSTF Agency Fund $104.94; TOTAL $898,810.46. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. DESIGNATION AND RESERVE OF 2005 YEAR END FUND BALANCE APPROVED AS PRESENTED Mr. Hughes explained, due to unexpected non -tax revenues from building permits and ambulance services, 2005 revenues significantly exceeded expenditures. He said the Finance Department recommended the reserves be designated as follows: Parkland Dedication Fund $ 11,374 Reserve for Commitments Employee Separation Public Works Commodities/ Projects Fuel/Heat/Light Traffic Studies/ Other Contingencies Liquor Fund Transfer Reserve for General Fund Operations ($ 23,020) used for RPC activities ($20,000) used for Lewis Park blacktop $ 21,264 reserved for Public Art Committee $ 7,412 reserved for election carryover ($ 48,829) used for equipment replacement $100,000 to cover employee separation $100,000 for portion of resurfacing St. Louis Park border streets $150,000 for budget overruns $100,000 unbudgeted traffic studies, etc. $686,000 support of Capital Improvement Program $949,977 for cash flow and future budget or other considerations Member Masica made a motion approving the designation and reserve of the 2005 year end fund balance as presented. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Page 26 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2006 Motion carried. *PETITION RECEIVED RE UESTING POND DREDGING OF POND AT GLEASON ROAD AND STONEWOOD COURT Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Hulbert acknowledging receipt of a petition requesting pond dredging of the pond at Gleason Road and Stonewood Court and to refer the petition to the Engineering Department for processing as to feasibility. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. There being no further business on the Council Agenda,. Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 11:55 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Page 27 City Clerk 11 Mega-10 To: Mayor and City Council From:Gordon L. Hughes, City Manager Date: May 12, 2006 Re: Cypress Equities Proposal On May 16, 2006, the City Council will again consider Final Site Plan approval for the Cypress Equities project at Centennial Lakes. This request was previously heard at the April 18th meeting. On that occasion, the Council closed the public hearing and later continued consideration of the matter until May 16th. The Council requested that Cypress address a number "of issues concerning its Final Site Plan including: shadow studies, lighting plan --- -- anaiysis,-buildmg- materials= especially- those- relating-to-the-deck areas, France Avenue setbacks as they relate to additional right of way for a right turn lane, and final plans reflecting building placement and materials. Cypress Equities has submitted the enclosed plans and memorandum from Good Fulton & Farrell Architects which respond to the questions raised by the Council on April 18th. These plans should be viewed as supplemental to their previous submission. Cypress Equities' attorneys, Fredrikson & Byron, have submitted the enclosed letter addressing the plans and the requested variances. Follow up correspondence from Malkerson Gilliland Martin, attorneys for Mr. and Mrs. Bohan, is also included. In addition to the items noted above, the Council should note the following in its review of the submittal: Entrances to Condominium Tower. The supplemental plans have been revised with respect to the vehicular entrances along the north side of the condominium tower to the underbuilding parking. Staff believes that this is a minor revision which improves accessibility to the garage. Tree Removal /Landscaping /Construction Easement. The supplemental plans more accurately identify the trees that require removal to facilitate the proposed project. Please refer to sheet number L.1.10 B in the Site Development Plan submittal which illustrates such trees. The developers note that trees that can be removed without damage will be made available to the City for !� transplanting. This plan sheet also illustrates, in bold dashed lines, a proposed construction easement which reflects the park areas to 7 which Cypress requires access in order to construct the project. Sheet number L.1.12 B is a landscape plan that illustrates the overstory trees which will be installed as part of the project. This plan contemplates a more open landscape plan along the pedestrian plaza and restaurant uses in order to provide better visual connections between these areas and the parka Trees removed from the easterly side of the development, i.e. the parking structure, will be replaced primarily with evergreen trees for screening purposes. Our Park Department staff has reviewed the proposed plans with the landscape architects for the project and has prepared a memo which is part of the submittal , France Avenue Variance. The proposed plans continue to illustrate the need for a setback variance from France Avenue. However, the magnitude of this variance has been reduced in two ways. First, the plans have clarified the height of the retail buildings on the France Avenue side. (Refer to top elevation on Attachment 4 in project book.) This drawing clarifies that the height of the building is 34 — 35 feet as measured from the sidewalk rather than 39 — 44 feet as shown on the prior submittals. The prior plans measured the height from the curb - -- elevation -of- France- Avenue - rather -.than the sidewalk. In staffs view, the measurement from the sidewalk is the appropriate method based on our zoning ordinance. Therefore, building height does not trigger an additional setback requirement over and above 35 feet as required by the zoning. ordinance. Second, in reviewing the plans once again, staff believes that the requirement for a bus pull off 'lane along France Avenue is not necessary. Therefore, additional right of way or easements for this purpose are not needed. This eliminates the need for a setback variance along the southerly three retail spaces which are identified as "retail 2, 3 and 4" in Cypress Equities earlier submittals. Staff continues to believe that right of way for a north bound right turn lane on France Avenue should be dedicated as part of this project. This dedication would result in a France Avenue setback for the most northerly retail building (i.e. "retail 1 ") of approximately 27 feet whereas 35 feet is required. The correspondence from Cypress Equities attorneys addresses their reasons as to why this variance is appropriate. • Page 2 It should be noted that this right turn lane need not be built today and is ° not necessary to facilitate the Cypress project. Staffs concern deals more with the possible redevelopment of properties to the north of Cypress which, if intensified significantly, could precipitate the need,for such a turn lane. (Please understand that no proposals have been received for the redevelopment of these properties.) • Page 3 0ORSEY DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Gordon Hughes, City Manager. FROM: Jerome P. Gilligan DATE: May 12, 2006 RE: Cypress Equities — Redevelopment of 7311 France Avenue Attached are draft findings of the City Council relating to the setback variances that are being requested with respect to the proposed Cypress Equities development at 7311 France Avenue. These have been prepared by our office in consultant with City staff for the Council's consideration should it determine to approve the development and grant the requested variances. DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 1 FINDINGS FOR VARIANCES FROM SETBACK STANDARD 1. Background. The proposed final site plan for the Amendment to the Overall Development Plan for Centennial Lakes, related to Lot 1, block 1, South Edina Development Addition (7311 France Avenue South) (the "Parcel ") includes a request for a setback variance for the condominium tower to be included in the development of the Parcel. Because the City has determined to require the dedication of additional right -of -way along France Avenue for the construction of a right -turn lane at the intersection of France Avenue and Gallagher Drive, a setback variance is also required for the northerly retail building of the two retail buildings to be constructed along France Avenue. Under Section 850.04, subd. 2. D. 7 of the City Code, the City Council may approve such variance in connection with and at the same time as final site plan approval. Under the City Code, variances which are an integral part of the final site plan are considered by the City Council. 2. Findings for the Condominium Tower. The City Council has analyzed whether the developer faces a hardship sufficient to justify the proposed variance for the condominium tower. The City Council finds and determines that the setback variance in the final site plan for the Parcel is justified for the following reasons: (a) The MDD -6 subdistrict requires a minimum front street setback of 35 feet, plus %2 foot of additional setback for each foot a building exceeds the minimum, and a minimum side yard setback of 20 feet, plus %2 foot of additional setback for each foot a building exceeds the minimum. The condominium tower meets the front street setback requirement and the minimum -- side yard setbaek requiremerits,-bufbecause of the proposed'heigizt of the tower, a side yard variance is needed from the northerly edge of the Parcel. The proposed variance is warranted for the following reasons: (i) The MDD -6 subdistrict has no maximum height limit, and the City Code's existing sliding scale building height/setback standard for this subdistrict, as applied to the Parcel, permits construction of a building even taller than the proposed tower without any variances on a different location on the Parcel. Thus, the proposed 208 -foot height of the tower fits within the essential character of this subdistrict, and is.an allowable height for a building to be constructed on the Parcel. (ii) The Overall Development Plan for Centennial Lakes approved the inclusion of taller buildings in the Centennial Lakes development, and the recently completed Greater Southdale Area Land Use and Transportation Study envisions the development of taller buildings in the Greater Southdale Area. (iii) The Parcel is adjacent to Centennial Lakes Park, an award - winning city park developed in accordance with the Overall Development Plan for Centennial Lakes, and construction on the Parcel of a relatively taller building with a smaller building footprint will result in lesser impact on the park than would occur if the Parcel were developed with buildings of lower heights and larger building footprints. -1- (iv) The City and its residents will benefit from having the condominium tower built closer to the northern edge of the Parcel; because that building location maximizes the ability to make land available for a public plaza and entrance to the park. (v) The irregular shape of the Parcel, and existing easements that bisect the Parcel, including utility easements, negatively impact the reasonable development of the Parcel in accordance with the requirements of the City Code and result in limitations on the location of the condominium tower on the Parcel. (b) . Circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, as outlined below, make the northerly edge of the property the most desirable location for the proposed . condominium tower, but it cannot be built there without a variance. (i) The Parcel is located adjacent to France Avenue, a major arterial county road with 6 through lanes. Direct access to the Parcel is provided by a private easement over the property immediately north of the Parcel. Hennepin County will not approve any chance in such France Avenue access to the Parcel. Location of the condominium tower on the northerly edge of the parcel nearer to the France Avenue access to the Parcel and also to the retail buildings on the westerly edge of the property results in improved traffic circulation for the development of the Parcel in accordance with the final site plan, as well as for the adjacent Centennial Lakes Medical Office Building. Thus, granting the variance will better enable the developer to provide for traffic and parking in accordance with the City's goals of minimizing the impact on traffic flow in the vicinity. (ii) Locating the condominium tower on the northerly edge of the Parcel minimizes the impact of the development of the Parcel on the public access to the park and the views of the park from the west. (iii) . The proposed location for the condominium tower works best not just for the developer, but also for the City and its residents. Shifting the building's footprint to the north, makes possible the inclusion of a public plaza as an entrance to the park, which will enhance the usage and access to the park as a public amenity. (iv) The proposed northerly location of the condominium tower leaves all of the existing easements unobstructed, in a way that siting the tower in accordance with strict setback requirements would not permit. Placing the tower in a location on the Parcel where no setback variance would be required might require relocation of existing utility easements, which would be costly and disruptive. (c) Locating the condominium tower on the northerly edge of the Parcel is a reasonable use, because it compensates for constraints imposed by the Parcel's irregular shape and existing easements, and it enhances the use of the Parcel to further many of the City's goals, including lesser negative impact on the park and improved traffic flow. (d) Strict enforcement of the literal provisions of the zoning ordinance to prevent placement of the condominium tower near the northerly edge of the property would cause undue -2- M hardship because such placement is a reasonable use of the property, and without the requested variance, the property could not be put to a reasonable use 3. Findings for the Northerly Retail Building. The City Council has analyzed whether the developer faces a hardship sufficient to justify the proposed variance for the northerly retail building. The City Council finds and determines that the proposed setback variance is justified for the following reasons: (a) The retail building design as originally proposed was designed to meet the MDD- 6 subdistrict's 35 -foot front yard and 20 -foot side yard setback requirements for a 35 -foot high building. The design was given preliminary approval in December 2005, with those conditions, and without any need for a setback variance from France Avenue. Thus, the proposed 35 -foot height of the retail building design, and.35 -foot setback from the existing property line along France Avenue fits within the essential character of this subdistrict, and is an allowable height for the retail building to be constructed on the Parcel. (b) A need for a France Avenue variance has arisen because the City has required that an additional 8 feet of right -of -way be dedicated along the westerly edge of the property for the construction of a right -hand turn lane from France Avenue to Gallagher Drive. Such a lane is not required to handle the traffic that will be generated by this project, as demonstrated by the traffic study commissioned for this project. (c) The Planning Commission and the Transportation Committee recommended approval of the development, and the City Council gave preliminary approval to the development without any condition that a turn lane be constructed. The request for a turn lane arose later in the planning process, as a desired enhancement of the City's ability to accommodate traffic that may be generated by future development in the vicinity. Granting the proposed variance will better enable the developer to provide for future traffic needs in accordance with the City's goals of minimizing the impact on traffic flow in the vicinity. (d) The proposed dedication of additional right -of -way needed to construct the turn lane will alter the property's westerly boundary in such a way that the proposed northerly retail building, which complies with the City's setback requirements as applied to the Parcel's existing property lines, would then become out of compliance. (e) The developer has expressed its willingness to accommodate the City's request to construct a turn lane along France Avenue, but not at the considerable expense that would be required to redesign and reengineer its final plans in order to move the northerly retail building several feet further away from France Avenue. (f) To redesign the project in order to move the northerly retail building farther away from France Avenue would reduce the amount of land available for the proposed public plaza and entrance to the park. The current location of the retail buildings maximizes the developer's ability to provide the currently designed public plaza and park entrance as an amenity for the City and its residents. -3- n• (g) The irregular shape of the Parcel, and existing easements that bisect the Parcel, including utility easements, negatively impact the reasonable development of the Parcel in accordance with the requirements of the City Code and result in limitations on the location of the retail buildings on the Parcel. (h) Circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, as outlined above, make the current location the most desirable location for the proposed retail buildings. If the developer is to provide the requested right -of -way to honor the City's request for a turn lane, the northerly retail building cannot be constructed as designed without a variance. (i) Given the retail building design's full compliance with existing zoning requirements, and the lack of any turn lane requirement resulting from the traffic study for this project, the final plan for the retail buildings represents a reasonable use of the Property. 0) Strict enforcement of the literal provisions of the zoning ordinance to prevent placement of the northerly retail building as presently designed to meet the 35 -foot setback requirement from the existing property line along France Avenue would cause undue hardship, because such placement is a reasonable use of the property, and without the requested variance, the property could not be put to a reasonable use. 4. Findings Applicable to Both Requested Variances. (a) While not dispositive, economic considerations favor the proposed variances, because, among other things, the size and placement of the condominium tower and retail buildings will promote interaction between sufficient numbers of residential users and the retail components of the project, and redesign and relocation of the proposed buildings would be costly and disruptive, potentially requiring relocation of existing easements. (b) For each requested variance, the plight of the developer is due to circumstances unique to the property, and not created by the developer. (c) The proposed variances will not alter the essential character of the locality, which is specifically zoned as a mixed use district, allowing residential, commercial, and other uses, allowing taller buildings than the proposed condominium tower on a property of this size, and allowing retail buildings of 35 feet in height to be placed at a setback of 35 feet from the existing property line along France Avenue. -4- 0 Gpod Fitton & Farrell Architects R Lawrence Good. FAN Duncan L Fulmn, MA 2808 Fairmount Street 214.303.1500/Tel David Meod Fand, AIA Suite 300 214.303.1512/Fax Joseph J. Patti' AIA, CSI Bryce Weigand, FAIR Dallas, Texas 75201 www.gff.com Karen K. Quick MBA K Jeffrey L Good, ALA May 9, 2006 The Honorable James Hovland, Mayor The Honorable Scot Housh, Council Member The Honorable Alice Hulbert, Council Member The Honorable Linda Masica, Council Member The Honorable Ann Swenson, Council Member Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Re: Resolution No. 200647 Final Site Plan for Cypress Equities Response to City Council's Issues Dear Mayor and Council Members: Tamara K Chambles, AM Lawrence Cosby, AIA Scott A Kanaga, AIA Donald R Kubala, AIA Wan William Kuper, AIA John Mcebes, AIA James L Manning Richard L Myers, Alk Jonathan P. Rollins, AIA Scott A Sorer, AIA CCCA David H. Swaim, AIA We respectfully submit responses to the nine issues that the City Council requested additional information for during the City Council Meeting on April 18, 2006 in which approval of the final site plan for 7311 France Avenue South was sought. Below we have listed the issue raised along with our response. Issue fl1: Obtain approval from the City Parks Department for the proposed modifications to the landscaping on the City's side of the property line along the southem and eastern_edge of the site in Centennial Lake Park? Response #1: City Parks has reviewed and supports the proposed modifications to the landscaping on the City's side of the property line along the southern and eastern edge of the site in Centennial Lake Park. See Attachment #1 letter dated May 8, 2006 from John Keprios, Director of Edina Park & Recreation Department. Issue #2.- Provide additional summer and winter shadow studies, especially studies for 5 & 7pm. Response #2: Additional shadow.studies have been provided. See Attachment #2. Issue #3. Provide a photometric study for the site and amenity deck. Response #3: A photometric study for the site has been provided. See Attachment #3. Issue #4. Provide a response to the 35'setback requirement along France Avenue South. Response #4: The heights of the retail buildings along France Ave. have been adjusted to respect the original 35 ft. setback from the property line. Since the bus pull -off and right turn lane on France Ave. were not required by the County or City, Cypress has elected to not construct them. The impact to the project is too great if the City measures the setback from the right -of- way /dedicated easement and not from the original property line. Cypress will voluntarily add the turn lane, if the City agrees to measure the setback from the property line and not the right -of- way /dedicated easement. See Attachment #4. Issue #5.- Provide clarification of the materials for the condominium balconies and the design of the exterior amenity level for the condominium. Response #5: We have provided a rendering depicting the design intent of the balconies. During the City Council meeting, the Design Team incorrectly identified the balcony material as glass. This material has always been perforated metal panel, please see March 8, 2006 submittal package, plates 16, 17, 18, 19, and 29. On the updated enlarged rendering, we have Resolution No. 200647 Final Site Plan for Cypress Equities Response to City Council's Issues May 9, 2006 Page 2 of 2 indicated the materials used. See Attachment #5A. We have provided an enlarged plan of the exterior amenity level for the condominium, indicating the materials used. See Attachment #5B. Issue #6.- Define the materials and design intent of the Pedestrian Plaza. Response #6: We have provided an enlarged plan of the Pedestrian Plaza indicating materials used. See Attachment #!6. Issue #7.- Illustrate the connection from the handicap parking spaces to the City Park. Response #7: We have provided an enlarged plan of the Pedestrian Plaza indicating this connection. See Attachment #6. Issue #8.- Revisit why an additional level of parking was not pursued under the condo lowering the building an additional floor, and has a final geotechnical report been completed for the site? Response #8: Placing another level of parking below grade would put that level below the 100 yr. flood plain (841 ft USGS). This would require a variance from the watershed district and entail extensive waterproofing to meet their requirements. Cypress instead eliminated one floor of residential, reducing the height from 18 stories (inclusive of 3 stories of parking) to 17 stories (inclusive of 3 stories of parking). Braun.lntertec has issued a final geotechnical report, dated May 8, 2006. See Attachment #8. Issue f19. Formally submit the encumbrances plan and any other exhibits that support your request for a variance. Response #9: We have attached the following: 9a. Encumbrances Plan showing easements, set backs, access points, and cross access agreements. 9b. Section through the property showing allowable heights per MDD-6 at both France Ave. and Gallagher. 9c. Perspective showing 3 dimensional envelope of what is allowed per MDD-6 with taller compliant building, closer to the lake. _bid. Perspective show ing'3- dimensional envelope of what is allowed per MDD-6, with our building, viewed from NE. 9e. Perspective showing 3- dimensional envelope of what is allowed per MDD-6 with our building, viewed from the NW. Please call if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, ARCHITECTS PA2005 \0520ft- jursdictional agencies\g01-zoning development code anatysis\060509_City Council Submission.doc r t� May 'll, 2006 To: Mayor James Hovland Edina City Council Members: Alice Hulbert, Linda Masica Ann Swenson, Scot Housh From: Roberta Thorpe 6904 Cornelia Drive Edina Mn. 55435 952 - 929 -0260 Dear Mayor Hovland and Council Members, Again, I am compelled to sprite to you in regards to the Centennial Lakes proposal. I believe those of you in favor of this development may not realize the negative effect it will have on our entire area. I beg you to walk and spend some time in the park surrounding the theater site. There.i.s no way, in my opinion, a development the size, height, and density that is being considered should be built there. I was walking the .path the other day at 4:45 and the shadow cast to the east was almost to the other .side (near the townhomes). There is not alot of space between the two! The height is going to have an unbelievable effect on the residents and the park. I am enclosing some of the pictures I took that day. I hope they will refresh your memory of the park setting and the peace and quiet people experience there. The pictures also show the existing landscaping and the shadows on the water at about 5:00 p.m.. Please, please be very careful to what you approve of for this very special site. Once the area is developed - that's it - you can't return it to the developer! He'll be gone!! And, we, the citizens of Edina will be stuck with what's there. Again, I stress that you consider the shadow that will be cast at "all times" of the day, not only for the residents close by but for the people using the park. Also consider, the light reflection during the day, the lights at night, added traffic, noise, etc. I, personally, enjoy seeing the sunrise and sunsets. When I viewed the latest design for the project,it looked like the high -rise belongs on Miami Beach! I thought it was awful! It just doesn't fit in with the existing environment. This space, this location is not where the majority of Edina residents want to see this type of development. Please represent the people and not the developers. I was shocked and saddened when the Gabbert -Beck proposal was voted through by one vote, without the approval of the Planning Commission. What is going on here? Everyone I have talked to thinksit's ridicu- lous, a high -rise hotel /condo in that location! Talk about an eye- sore, it should never have been approved. They, also are not in favor of the Centennial Lakes project. You were elected by the people of Edina, please represent us. Thank you. Sin ely Pictures enclosed - Please share them. Roberta Thorpe •_ati y a 4 47 A k z� e. _ x . ,.nL 11- - s-aC• r RT ". Jet +r.y ...� . � � � j •4 `�, ors i .74 • y4,�• f _ y/ ♦ � t . ' fir, . v .� ;�;-� : -, 'y'�; .. _ •__ _ ... _ . _ � _ ,.°ji, rya ,�3 . j '000 if fit u, '" `. •�• � -` ,�:.. ,,,�- .. � .ter' �< f �. yRyl•. y, ', x�, _ ,aloft . r.r�.,.�,a,,,3.1fYiw: °"..,.�7Mr� � .S�a•; , fz- 1 Ak AJJ 4 "R! t: rZ Y u•� g xa �° .y .� fad Q + .GR:i � ��• �[ 4� 1� +1-- -. • • �, . � • } . i• '4 lc. F, }r;.i .T +t '_ s rr�•w �� I f.'� •• .. .:�� E'» \� : #��Y �}. ��� C q �..� -^• -- ..K rte. x- �4 iii Atl�F k9:� P MR, 00 4., �', � - '�.'�xY. •I'' l��T �!9 r' 1'. `" .y° �.itiFi��. _•x3" R.. _,b�!. -. .�r�M, ^' -..Cl� fir'' 4,�Y.. �'r�`.. • .t_� .y.' �Y�. � w ' ii�YO'� u-♦ Ad r P. ? y MJJc Fc 4+ �[• ', <, f • .,_ ��� x^ � :� � Ott � MALKERSON GILLILAND MARTIN LLP 220 sovix SDn m srREn, Surr a 1900 Mmmpoi ;, MN 55402 7VLMHONB 612 - 344111 I FAcsi muE 612 - 3441414 MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor James Hovland City of Edina City Council Member Scot Housh City of Edina City Council Member Alice Hulbert City of Edina City Council Member Linda Masica City of Edina City Council Member Ann Swenson FROM: Bruce D. Malkerson Patrick B. Steinhoff RE: Centennial Lakes Overall Development Plan Amendment Final Plan Approval — Cypress Equities Our File No. 1773.001 DATE: May 12, 2006 We are submitting this Memorandum on behalf of John and Janet Bohan as a supplement to the previous Memoranda we submitted regarding the Cypress Equities proposal to amend the Centennial Lakes Overall Development Plan (the "Overall Development Plan') to allow construction of a 17 -story condominium tower at the movie theater site (the "Property'). In this Memorandum, we wish to emphasize the following points: A. The City cannot take the "easy way out" and grant variances to favored applicants for the purpose of escaping the plain standards of its Zoning Ordinance. If the City does not like the height and setback requirements currently permitted in MDD-6 zoning districts without variances, it must make the hard political choices necessary to amend its Zoning Ordinance in a way that applies equally to all property owners within the distri ct. B. Cypress Equities' hypothetical 19 -story building is irrelevant because it is not the project for which Cypress Equities has applied for approval. Even if this were not so, the City Council would be compelled to disapprove such a building because it would violate (among other things) the Zoning Ordinance § 850.04, subd. 2(D)(5) requirement that structures within MDD districts have a "proper relationship" with existing structures, open space and natural features. C. None of the "circumstances unique to the property" identified by Cypress Equities have any causal connection to the setbacks or height of the proposed 17 -story 106235.doc;2 I` City of Edina City Council May 12, 2006 Page 2 building. Consequently, the proposal does not satisfy the Minn. Stat. § 462.357 "undue hardship" test." D. Although existing Minnesota case -law on this point is admittedly not fully developed, the statutory requirement regarding the "reasonable use" of the Property is not broad enough to justify the requested variance. Consequently, the proposal does not satisfy the Minn. Stat. § 462.357 "undue hardship" test." For these reasons and the other reasons set forth in our previous Memoranda, it would be unlawful for the City Council to approve the variance requested by Cypress Equities. We therefore respectfully request that the City Council deny Cypress Equities' application. 1. CYPRESS EQUITIES' HYPOTHETICAL 19 -STORY BUILDING Is NOT A PROPER BASIS TO APPROVE THE REQUESTED VARIANCE. . The fact (even if it were true) that Cypress Equities could build a 19 -story building without variances is irrelevant because that is not the proposal before the City Council. Moreover, the City would have ample discretion to disapprove (and would probably be legally compelled to disapprove) such a building because it violates (among other things) the Zoning Ordinance § 850.04, subd. requirement -that buildings within MDD districts have a `proper relationship" with existing structures, open space and natural features. a. The Hypothetical Building Is Not Before the City Council and Is Therefore Irrelevant. Cypress Equities' assertion that it could build a 19 -story building without a variance is irrelevant. Cypress Equities is essentially stating: "We could build a building without a setback/height variance if we complied with the setback/height requirement." Even if it were true (which is not the case as explained below), this is not a very compelling (or a legally sufficient) argument for approval of a variance. In any event, the hypothetical 19 -story building is not presently before the City Council. It is therefore irrelevant. b. The City Council Would Disapprove the Hypothetical Building if It Were Proposed because it, Among Other Things, Violates the Zoning Ordinance Requirement that Buildings Have a Proper Relationship with "Existing Buildings, Open Space and Natural Features." Even though Cypress Equities' hypothetical 19 -story building is irrelevant because it is not before the City Council, it is important to note that the City would not be. required to approve such a building if Cypress Equities were to propose it. At the April 18`s City Council meeting, it seemed that one or more Council members believed that the City would be legally obligated to approve the hypothetical 19 -story building if Cypress Equities were to submit an application simply because such a project would arguably not require any variances. The Mayor in particular seemed to express 106235.doc;2 t' City of Edina City Council May 12, 2006 Page 3 support for die project as currently proposed simply because the proposed project is a lesser evil than the hypothetical project. A choice between the project as currently proposed and the hypothetical 19 -story building described by Cypress Equities is a false choice. The City Council would have no obligation to approve such a building were an application ever submitted. The City Council has ample discretion under the City Code to disapprove such a building. Indeed, the substantive criteria for project approval in MDD districts would most likely compel the City Council to disapprove such a building. Zoning Ordinance § 850.04, subd. 2(D)(5) establishes substantive criteria by which the City is to evaluate Overall Development Plans in MDD districts. The ordinance states in its entirety: Commission Review of Overall Development Plan. Within 45 days after submission of the Overall Development Plan in form and substance acceptable to the Planner, the Commission shall review the Overall Development Plan and shall recommend approval by the Council upon finding that the proposed development: a. is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; b. is consistent with the Preliminary Development Plan as approved and modified by the Council and contains the Council imposed conditions to the extent the conditions can be complied with by the Final Development Plan. c. will not be detrimental to properties surrounding the tract; d. will not result in an overly- intensive land use; e. will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards; f. conforms to the provisions of this Section and other applicable provisions of this Code; and g. provides a proper relationship between the proposed improvements, existing structures, open space and natural features. As an amendment to an existing Overall Development Plan, the hypothetical 19 -story building would be subject to the above - listed criteria (just as the currently proposed project is subject to the above - listed criteria). Applying the criteria to the hypothetical 19 -story building would surely result in denial by the City Council for the following reasons: a) The hypothetical building would be even more detrimental to Coventry and other properties than the building currently proposed; b) It would result in an overly- intensive land use; 106235.doc;2 f City of Edina City Council May 12, 2006 Page 4 c) It would result in traffic wugestion; and d) Most importantly, it would not have a "proper relationship" with existing structures or the open space and natural features that characterize the City Park property (unless one considers a 19 -story building towering directly over a park to be a "proper relationship "). .For these reasons (and undoubtedly others), the City Council would have ample authority to disapprove a request from Cypress Equities to build the hypothetical 19 -story building. Indeed, the above - listed criteria (particularly the requirement of a proper relationship with existing buildings, open space and natural features) would likely compel the City to disapprove such an application because it would be arbitrary and capricious for the City to conclude that such a building would have a proper relationship with the park and the Coventry residences. Such a conclusion would obviously not be true. Indeed, the hypothetical shadow studies and other depictions of the hypothetical 19- story building submitted to the City by Cypress Equities establish beyond any doubt that such a building would be unacceptable to the City. Therefore, it is not correct to state that Cypress Equities could build a hypothetical 19 -story building without variances. Rather, Cypress Equities could build such a hypothetical building without variances if the City Council determined that the hypothetical building met the substantive criteria of Zoning Ordinance § 850.04, subd. 2(D)(5). The City Council would certainly not make such a determination. For this reason, Cypress Equities' hypothetical 19 -story building is not an alternative to the proposed building, and the City Council should not base its variance decision on a comparison between the proposed building and the hypothetical building. t Cypress Equities' hypothetical 19 -story building is premised on the City Staff position that there are no internal setback requirements for lots within an MDD zoning district tract. See Zoning Ordinance § 850.02, subd. 6(2) ( "Setbacks shall be measured from the boundary of the tract or from public street right -of way. ") For purposes of this Memorandum, we will assume that this position is correct. However, we question why the City would adopt such a zoning ordinance. From a planning policy perspective, measuring setbacks from the boundary of the tract is an acceptable policy when .the City approves the initial development plan within a planned district because the City and the developer at that time have total control over the design and use of the tract as a whole. However, it is not sound policy when the City considers redevelopment applications once the tract has been subdivided into separate developed lots that are owned and used by others (like the Coventry residents). Is this really what the City Council intended at the time it adopted the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance related to planned districts? Did it intend for owners of developed lots within a 'it is also worth noting that the hypothetical building depicted by Cypress Equities is much different from the currently proposed structure. The hypothetical structure has 0' setbacks from the park property but has a much larger setback_ from Gallagher Avenue. The currently proposed structure has the same 0' setbacks from the park property and also has a minimal setback from Gallagher Avenue. In other words, the currently proposed structure uses the entire breadth of the lot, which is not true of the hypothetical structure. 106235.doc;2 City of Edina City Council May 12, 2006 Page 5 planned district to be able to request redevelopment of those lots without regard to lot boundaries? Is this what the present City Council intends now? Are other property owners within the Centennial Lakes Overall Development Plan free to propose structures with 0' setbacks from the City Park property and from boundaries with neighboring lots? We doubt very much that the City Council intended that the owners of developed lots within planned districts be able to redevelop those lots without being subject to setback requirements from the lot boundaries within the planned district tract when it adopted the zoning standards for MDD districts, and we doubt the current City Council considers that to be sound policy today.2 For this reason, it is especially inappropriate to compare Cypress Equities' hypothetical 19 -story building with the building Cypress Equities has actually proposed. 2. THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT SATISFY THE MILAN. STAT. § 462.357 "UNDUE HARDSHIP" TEST. As set forth in our previous Memoranda, there simply is not any `endue hardship" here sufficient to lawfully justify the requested variance. In order to satisfy the Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. 6 "undue hardship" test, Cypress Equities must established that: 1) that the property "cannot be put to a reasonable use" without the requested variance; 2) that the claimed `undue hardship" not be based solely on economic considerations; 3) that the claimed "undue hardship" arise from - - -circumstances unique to-thepropertythat-are not- self - inflicted by thepropertyowner; 4) that, even if an "undue hardship" exists, the variance, if granted, will not alter the "essential character of the locality;" and 5) that, even if an "undue hardship" exists, the variance, if granted, would be "in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance." As set forth in our previous submissions, the building proposed by Cypress Equities does not satisfy any of the above - listed criteria (because, among other things, the building is much taller than any other building in the neighborhood and represents a dramatic change from the development depicted in the Centennial Lakes Overall Development Plan on which Coventry residents relied when they purchased their property). However, this part of the Memorandum will focus solely on the two parts of the multi -part "undue hardship" test that the City Council discussed at its April 18a` meeting: 1) The requirement that the hardship arise from "circumstances unique to the property" that were "not created by the landowner;" and 2) The requirement that the property "cannot be put to a reasonable use without the variance." Cypress Equities has failed to establish that the proposed building satisfies either of these tests. Accordingly, it would be unlawful for the City to grant Cypress Equities the requested variance. Z However, as noted, if the City Council does consider 0' setbacks to be sound policy, the City Council has ample authority in any case to disapprove buildings with 0' setbacks in accordance with the criteria of Zoning Ordinance § 850.04, subd. 2(D)(5). 106235.doc;2 City of Edina City Council May 12, 2006 Page 6 a. There Are No "Unique Circumstances" Sufficient To Justify A Variance. Cypress Equities has identified the following three `unique circumstances" in support of its variance request: 1) Access to the Property from Gallagher Avenue is limited to a single point because of an easement agreement with the Dayton Hudson Corporation, the owner of the parcel directly across Gallagher Avenue from the Property; 2) The Property is subject to other easements,; as depicted in Attachment #9a to the May 9, 2006 letter from GFF Architects; and 3) the Property's boundary with the City park property has an irregular shape. It is true that the Property has an irregular shape along the lot boundary with the City park property. It also appears to be true that the current owner of the Property is party to an easement agreement with the Dayton Hudson Corporation that restricts the location of the access to the Property from Gallagher Avenue. We have no way of verifying whether the other easements depicted in Attachment #9a exist, but we will assume that they do for purposes of this Memorandum. Even if one could describe these characteristics as "unique circumstances" (they are noe), they have absolutely no connection to Cypress Equities' need for the requested variance. They have no connection to the height or setbacks of the proposed 17 -story building. Consequently, they would not result in any "undue hardship" if the City were to strictly apply its Zoning Ordinance. - ---� 3t-is-not-enough-for there -to be-a- condition affecting- the - Property- that -isL mique" (even -if the above - listed conditions were in fact unique). Rather, there must be a unique condition that creates a hardship. There must be a causal link between the claimed uniqueness of the property and the requested variance. For example, in Rowell v. City of Moorhead, 446 N.W.2d 917,922 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989), the court found that the fact that the City of Moorhead adopted a setback requirement after the date an existing building on the subject property had been constructed properly constituted a "circumstances unique to the property" sufficient to create an `undue hardship." The need for a variance arose directly from the "circumstance" that the City had adopted its zoning ordinance after the construction of the existing building. In Sagstetter v. City of St. Paul, 529 N.W.2d 488, 491 -92 (Minn. Ct. App. 1995), the court found that a water main running beneath the subject property that prevented the excavation necessary to construct a structure that conformed to the applicable zoning ordinance properly constituted a "circumstance unique to the property" sufficient to create an "undue hardship." The applicant's need for a variance arose directly from the "circumstance" that a water main prevented an excavation of the subject property. Here, the shape of the Property does not to create an "undue hardship." The Property does indeed have an irregular shape (like all parcels in Centennial Lakes) along the lot boundary with the City park property, but it also has a surface area of more than four acres. How does the irregular shape of one boundary of a four -acre lot create the need for such a tall, massive building? How does 'The easements depicted on Attachment #9a relate to utilities, sidewalks, transit, a pedestrian tunnel, and park space. 'The other lots in Centennial Lakes have similarly irregular boundaries with the City park property. Also, virtually every parcel of developed property anywhere is subject to the same types of easements that burden the Property here. Of the identified easements, only the transit easement and the park easement are different from the types of easements that burden other properties. However, neither the transit easement nor the park easement create an ` undue hardship" because they are not are connected in any way to the height or setbacks of the proposed building. 106235.doc;2 City of Edina City Council May 12, 2006 Page 7 the irregular shape of one boundary of the Property prevent Cypress Equitics from constructing a smaller building that complies with the Zoning Ordinance? There is simply no connection between the shape of the Property and the height or setbacks of the proposed building. Similarly, the access easement and other easements do not create an `undue hardship." The access point from Gallagher Avenue to which Cypress Equities is supposedly limited is at exactly the same location as the current access point for the movie theater. The same is presumably true of the other easements identified in Attachment # 9a. The movie theater did not require a variance because of these easements. Why do the easements have any different effect on Cypress Equities? In any event, how does the location of the Property's access to Gallagher Avenue (or the location of the other easements) create a need for such a tall, massive building? How do these easements prevent Cypress Equities from constructing a smaller building that complies with the Zoning Ordinance? The location of the access point (and the location of the other easements) is not connected in anyway to the height or setbacks of the proposed building. Moreover, "unique circumstances" sufficient to justify a variance may not be "created by the landowner" requesting the variance. Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. 6. The restricted access from Gallagher Avenue is a result of an easement agreement negotiated by Cypress Equities' predecessors -in- interest with another private party. The same is presumably true of at least some of - -- the - other - identified- easements . —The- circumstances - resulting- from - these - easements are therefore "created by the landowner" and are insufficient to justify the granting of a variance request, even if the easements were connected in any way to the height or setbacks of the proposed building (which is not the case, as set forth above). b. The Proposed Project Does Not Satisfy the Requirement That The Property "Cannot Be Put To A Reasonable Use Without the Variance." The City Attorney has advised the City Council that the legal standard for variance approval is that the applicant "would like to use the property in a reasonable manner that is prohibited by the ordinance." This is language used by the Minnesota Court of Appeals in the Rowell case interpreting the requirement of the Minn. Stat. § 462.357 `undue hardship" test that the "property cannot be put to reasonable use without the variance." When considered as an isolated statement, this language may suggest that Rowell establishes that the City has the authority to approve any variance so long as it determines the requested use is reasonable in the ordinary sense. However, it is important to read the statement in context. For this purpose, we include the entire Rowell opinion as an attachment for the Council members to review. When one reads Rowell in context, as well as the variance cases decided subsequent to Rowell, it is clear that Rowell does not establish a standard of ordinary reasonableness (i.e. one that would allow a city to grant a variance any time it determines a requested use to be reasonable regardless of the applicable zoning restrictions). Rather, it establishes a standard that is more restrictive than ordinary reasonableness but less restrictive than the constitutional prohibition against the regulatory "taking" of private property by the government. Although the exact scope of this standard is not clear because it has not been fully developed by Minnesota appellate courts, it is extremely unlikely that a court 106235.doc;2 City of Edina City Council May 12, 2006 Page 8 would find this standard to be broad enough to justify the dramatic variance requested by Cypress Equities. In Rowell, the court upheld a decision by the City of Moorhead to grant a setback variance to Trinity Lutheran Church so that the Church could build an addition to its existing Church building, which had been constructed prior to the City's adoption of its zoning ordinance. The existing Church building had a 3' setback, whereas the subsequently - adopted zoning ordinance required a 25' setback. The plaintiff (a neighbor) challenging the variance approval argued that the approval was unlawful because it was possible to use the subject property without a variance (i.e. the Church could continue to use its existing building without an addition, or the addition could be constructed with a 25' setback even though the main building had a setback of 3'). The plaintiff argued that the Minn. Stat. § 462.357 requirement that the property "cannot be put to a reasonable use without the variance" therefore made the approval of the variance unlawful. In response, the court stated that the statutory requirement that the property "cannot be put to a reasonable use without the variance" should not be interpreted too literally. Id. at 922. Otherwise, the court stated that the words would be redundant and unnecessary because the Minnesota and United States Constitutions already prohibit municipalities from denying property owners all reasonable use of their property. The court noted that Minn. Stat. § 462.357 "is clearly intended to allow cities the flexibility to grant variances in cases where the constitution does not compel it." Id. The court then stated the words relied on by the City Attorney as follows: Thus, we read the first part of the definition of "undue hardship" as requiring a showing that the property owner would like to use the property in a reasonable manner that is prohibited by the ordinance. Id. However, the Rowell court makes it very clear that it intended the words "reasonable manner that is prohibited by the ordinance" to mean something different from ordinary reasonableness for the purpose of determining the existence of an undue hardship.5 Indeed, the very next sentence after the statement quoted above reads as follows: On the facts of this case, the precise issue is whether it would be reasonable to expect Trinity to build its addition 22 feet back from the front line of the existing building. If the evidence supports the Board's finding that building 22 feet back would be a reasonable use, we must affirm.... The statute and ordinances unfortunately provide no standard for determining reasonableness. Id. S Also, a city is required to act reasonably in any case independent of Minn. Stat. § 462.357. See Sagstetter v. City ojSt. Paul, 529 N.W.2d 488, 491 (Minn. Ct. App. 1995) CA reviewing court will set aside a city's decision in a zoning variance matter if the decision is unreasonable "). The `reasonable use" requirement therefore cannot be interpreted as ordinary reasonableness because this would be redundant and the requirement would be meaningless. 106235.doc;2 City of Edina City Council May 12, 2006 Page 9 The Rowell court inquired above whether it would be reasonable for the City of Moorhead to require strict compliance with the zoning ordinance by the Church, not whether the use proposed by the Church was reasonable in the ordinary sense. It also noted that there was no definition of reasonableness in the variance statute or Moorhead ordinance, which would hardly be necessary if the court intended to establish an ordinary reasonableness standard. The court stated further that a zoning authority must consider the "practical difficulties strict enforcement of the [ordinance] requirement would cause." Id. The court determined that it would be unreasonable for the City of Moorhead to require the applicant Church to build its addition within the required setback because the existing Church building already violated the setback and had been constructed prior to the adoption of the ordinance. Id. Using the analytical framework of the Rowell court, the City Council here should ask: Is it unreasonable to expect Cypress Equities .to abide by the City Zoning Ordinance? Does Cypress Equities face "practical difficulties" that prevent it from abiding by the City Zoning Ordinance? The answer to these questions is clearly "no." Why would it be unreasonable to expect Cypress Equities to comply with the City Zoning Ordinance, especially considering the enormous size of the Property (which consists of more than four acres of land)? What sort of "practical difficulties" could possibly justify construction of a building that so dramatically exceeds the height and setback requirements of - - - -- the - Zoning - Ordinance? -- -- - — - -- - In subsequent decisions, the Minnesota Court of Appeals6 has quoted the "would - like -to -use the - property -in -a- reasonable - manner" language used in Rowell, but has generally applied that language in a very restrictive way. See Mohler v. City of St. Louis Park, 643 N.W.2d 623 (Minn. Ct. App. 2002), (concluding that a 16 -foot garage was not a "reasonable use" in a zoning district where the ordinance limited garage height to 12 feet); and Kismet Investors, Inc. v. County of Benton, 617 N.W.2d 85 (Minn. Ct. App. 2000) (concluding that it was not a "reasonable use" to use the subject property as an adult cabaret because the subject property could also be used for other purposes). As noted in our previous Memoranda, the exact meaning of the Minn. Stat. § 462.357 requirement that the property "cannot be put to a reasonable use without the variance" is admittedly not very well developed by Minnesota courts. However, we do not believe that a court will interpret this requirement so broadly as to include the variance requested by Cypress Equities. Such an interpretation would render the "reasonable use" part of the "undue hardship" test meaningless, and the Legislature could not have intended that when it enacted Minn. Stat. § 462.357. 3. THE CYPRESS EQUITIES PROPOSAL DOES NOT MEET THE CRITERIA FOR MDD -6 DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL EVEN IF A VARIANCE WAS NOT REQUIRED. Although Cypress Equities' failure to establish an "undue hardship" sufficient to justify a variance is the most compelling reason for the City Council to disapprove the Cypress Equities 6 To our knowledge, the Minnesota Supreme Court has never addressed the Rowell interpretation of the "undue hardship" test. 106235.doc;2 City of Edina City Council May 12, 2006 Page 10 proposal, Cypress Equities has also not satisfied other Zoning Ordinance requirements. Zoning Ordinance § 850.04, subd. 2(D)(5) establishes substantive criteria by which the City is to evaluate Overall Development Plans in MDD districts. This ordinance provision is set forth in its entirety in Section 1(b) of this Memorandum. It requires that Overall Development Plans in MDD districts meet certain criteria, including: 1) that the proposed use not be detrimental to other properties; 2) that the proposed use not result in an overly intense land use; 3) that the proposed use not result in traffic congestion or hazards; and 4) that the proposed use have a "proper relationship" with "existing structures, open space and natural features." The record of the various public hearings the City has conducted on this matter is replete with testimony that the proposed structure will be detrimental to other properties, will result in traffic congestion, will result in an overly intense land use, and will not provide a proper relationship with existing structures (like the Coventry residences) or with the open space and natural features of the City park property. For all of these reasons, the proposed building does not satisfy the criteria for Overall Development Plan approval established by Zoning Ordinance § 850.04, subd. 2(D)(5). Accordingly, the City Council should not approve the Cypress Equities application even if it finds that Cypress Equities is entitled to the requested variance (which it is not). 4. CONCLUSION. Based on the foregoing, and for the other reasons set forth in our previous submissions to the City, we respectfully request that the City Council deny the Cypress Equities application. Thank you for this opportunity to comment and for the opportunity to speak at the last meeting. 9 Cypress Equities has to this point not presented a depiction of the view Coventry residents would have of the proposed 17 -story building. If it were to do so, the Council Members would realize that the sheer mass of the proposed structure (in addition to its height) would have a significantly detrimental effect on the residents of Coventry. If constructed, the proposed structure would be visually overwhelming. We encourage the Council Members to visit Coventry prior to the May 16th meeting to see this for themselves. 106235.doc;2 446 N.W.2d 917 446 N.W.2d 917 (Cite as: 446 N.W.2d 917) Court of Appeals of Minnesota. John ROWELL, Appellant, V. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF MOORHEAD, Trinity Lutheran Church, Respondents. No. C7 -89 -637. Oct. 24, 1989. Review Denied Dec. 15, 1989. City resident filed action against church and city to invalidate city's grant of variance to church for proposed addition. The District Court, Clay County, William Walker, J., granted summary judgment for church and city, and resident appealed. The Court of Appeals, Short, J., held --that:—(-I-)= -failure—to—comply -- with- =procedural requirements of zoning ordinance was not grounds to set aside city's grant of variance; (2) public official who was financially contributing member of church was not .disqualified from voting on zoning ordinance requested by that church; and (3) evidence including aesthetic and functional considerations supported finding that denial of variance would cause undue hardship to church. Affirmed. West Headnotes 11] Zoning and Planning X625 414k625 Most Cited Cases Technical defects by city when complying with procedural requirements for granting variance did not constitute grounds for setting aside city's grant of variance absent any suggestion of prejudice. 12] Zoning and Planning X572 414k572 Most Cited Cases Resident who failed to raise issue at public hearings despite having legal representation and an Page 2 of 8 Page 1 opportunity to speak at public hearings was estopped from objecting to area variance on grounds that application was defective. [31 Zoning and Planning X518 414k518 Most Cited Cases City's grant of area variance did . not violate ordinance prohibiting expansion of existing nonconformities, which could be construed to mean that property owner was prohibited from building its proposed addition closer to property than existing three -foot nonconformity. M.S.A. § 645.26 subd. 1. 14] Zoning and Planning X543 414k543 Most Cited Cases Public official who was financially contributing member of a church was not disqualified from --voting =on-area-variance-requested-by--that -church 'under disqualification provision. M.S.A. § 471.87. 15] Zoning and Planning x504 414k504 Most Cited Cases Aesthetic and functional considerations including coordination of proposed addition with existing building and alignment of corridors and roof lines could support determination that strict enforcement of setback requirement would be unreasonable and that denial of area variance would cause undue hardship. 16] Zoning and Planning 0-518 414k518 Most Cited Cases In determining whether denial of church's request for variance from setback requirement would cause undue hardship, fact that existing church predated setback requirement supported conclusion that nonconformity was due to circumstances unique to property not created by landowner. 171 Zoning and Planning X501 414001 Most Cited Cases © 2006 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works. htto: / /Drint. westlaw .com /deliverv.html?dest =atn& format =HTMLE &dataid= BO055800000... 5/12/2006 446 N.W.2d 917 446 N.W.2d 917 (Cite as: 446 N.W.2d 917) 171 Zoning and Planning 0=504 414004 Most Cited Cases Grant of variance from setback requirement, conditioned on church's promise to plant trees, place planters along facade of addition, and preserve existing courtyards and playgrounds, was sufficient to assure that variance would not alter essential character of locality, thus supporting finding that denial of area variance would cause undue hardship to church. M.S.A. § 471.87. *918 Syllabus by the Court 1. Failure to comply with procedural requirements of a zoning ordinance is not grounds for setting aside a city's grant of a variance. 2. A city's' grant of a zoning variance did not violate an ordinance prohibiting expansion of existing nonconformities. Page 3 of 8 Page 2 zoning variance from the Board of Adjustment (Board) of the City of Moorhead (Moorhead). Appellant John Rowell brought suit against Trinity and Moorhead to invalidate Moorhead's action. The trial court granted summary judgment for the respondents. Rowell appealed, and we affirm. FACTS On June 1, 1988, Trinity's architect sent a letter to Moorhead requesting a zoning variance to build an addition to an existing building three feet from the front property line. The Moorhead ordinance requires a front yard setback of 25 feet. Moorhead notified local residents of a public hearing to be held regarding Trinity's request for a variance. Rowell received notice. On July 25, 1988, the Board held a public hearing. Rowell spoke at the hearing arguing the addition 3. A financially contributing member of a church is would expand the existing encroachment by Trinity, not disqualified from voting on a zoning variance would cause a loss of green space, and that requested by that church. neighborhood meetings should be held to obtain neighborhood input on Trinity's proposal. Trinity's 4. Aesthetic and functional considerations architect explained that a parsonage had been supported city's finding of undue hardship in grant removed because it was no longer needed. A of zoning variance. run -down apartment building had also been removed from the site and would be replaced by William Kirschner, Fargo, N.D., for appellant. green space. The architect said the strip in front of the addition would be landscaped and maintained. Gregory D. Lewis, Moorhead City Atty., Moorhead, for Bd. of Adjustment of the City of Moorhead Randolph E. Stefanson, Moorhead, for Trinity Lutheran Church. Heard, considered and decided by SHORT, P.J., and FOLEY and LOMMEN [FN*], JJ. FN* Acting as judge of the Court of Appeals by appointment pursuant to Minn. Const. art. 6, § 2. OPINION SHORT, Judge. Trinity Lutheran Church (Trinity) obtained a The hearing was continued to July 26. On July 26, the Board met and again discussed the matter. Rowell again spoke, arguing Trinity's request for a variance had not been sufficiently publicized. The Board decided to delay action until a neighborhood meeting could be held. On August 11, a neighborhood meeting was held. Twenty-three people attended, including Rowell and representatives of Trinity and Moorhead On August 15, 1988, the Board met again. The architect explained that the addition would match the existing building's materials and architectural design, and that the roof lines would match. He also addressed concerns about parking congestion, saying Trinity planned to expand the parking lot. Rowell spoke against the variance, stating the addition would cause a loss of green space, increased traffic, and generally detract from the m 2006 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works. -, 0 +1011. 5/17./71)) 446 N.W.2d 917 446 N.W.2d 917 (Cite as: 446 N.W.2d 917) attractiveness of the historical neighborhood. He also argued the variance would violate Moorhead, Minn., Municipal Code § 10 -2C -1 (1988), which prohibits enlarging nonconforming uses. Rowell also said the addition would be visible from his residence and the planned courtyard would not be adequate green space. The Board deferred a final vote on the variance pending advice from Moorhead's attorney. *919 On August 29, 1988, the Board resumed its meeting, and, Moorhead's attorney and Rowell's attorney argued about whether the variance violated Moorhead Municipal Code § 10 -2C -1 on nonconforming uses. The Board approved the variance , with four members voting yes, one member voting no, and one member abstaining. Four affirmative votes were required to approve the variance. All the meetings, except the neighborhood meeting, were taped and summarized in prepared minutes. On October 8, 1988, Rowell filed a lawsuit seeking declaratory and injunctive relief. The Board and Trinity answered and counterclaimed On November 8, 1988, the Board moved the trial court to remand the variance to the Board for the Board to enter a written decision containing formal findings. The Board met on December 5, 1988, and approved a resolution that was later filed with the trial court. Presented with a record of undisputed facts, the trial court granted respondents' motion for summary judgment. ISSUES L. Does an applicant's failure to comply with procedural requirements of a zoning variance ordinance render a city's action invalid? I1. Does a grant of a variance authorized by ordinance violate another ordinance prohibiting expansion of existing nonconformities? III. Is a financially contributing member of a church disqualified from voting on a zoning variance request from the church? W. Do aesthetic and functional considerations constitute undue hardship under Minn.Stat. § 462.357, subd. 6(2) (1988)? Page 4 of 8 Page 3 ANALYSIS In reviewing a zoning action, we give no deference to the trial court's findings and conclusions. VanLandschoot v. City of Mendota Heights, 336 N.W.2d 503, 508 (Minn.1983). Where the municipal proceedings are fair and complete, review is on the record before the municipal agency. Swanson v. City. of Bloomington, 421 N.W.2d 307, 313 (Minn.1988). This court is reluctant to interfere with the management of municipal affairs. Id. at 311. I. The Moorhead Municipal Code provides that a variance shall not be granted by the Board unless: 1. A written application for a variance is submitted demonstrating: a. That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in the same district; b. That literal interpretation of the provisions of this Title would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this Title; c. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this Title to other lands, structures or buildings in the same district under the same conditions. Moorhead, Minn., Municipal Code § 10- 2 -6(A) (1988). [ 1 ] Rowell argues the. June 1 letter and the accompanying site plan did not satisfy the requirements of this code provision, and that the Board's actions were thus ultra vires and void. While the June 1 letter did not contain the information required by section 10- 2 -6(A), the defect is technical. Technical defects made when complying with procedural requirements do not suffice to overturn governmental action, so long as the defects do not reflect bad faith, undermine the purposes of the procedures, or prejudice the rights of those intended to be protected by the procedures. See City of Minneapolis v. Wurtele, 291 N.W.2d © 2006 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works. ht+„•/h%r;nt urowflmv ruin /A- li..Pry html9riPVt =atnR, format= NTMT. RRrrlatairl= R(1(155R(1(1(1(1t1... 5/1 ?./7.()(16 446 N.W.2d 917 446 N.W.2d 917 (Cite as: 446 N.W.2d 917) 386, 391 (Minn.1980). The information required by section 10- 2 -6(A) was presented at public hearings, of which Rowell had notice. In the absence of any suggestion of prejudice, Moorhead's decision *920 to waive strict compliance with section 10- 2 -6(A) will not be overturned. [2] Further, Rowell is estopped from objecting to the variance on the grounds that the application was defective because he failed to raise the issue at the public hearings, despite the fact that he had legal representation and an opportunity to speak at the public hearings. The defects in the application could have been easily corrected if the issue had been raised at an earlier stage of the process. Under these circumstances, Rowell "sat on his rights" and is estopped from raising these issues in a lawsuit. See Pilgrim v City of Winona, 256 N.W.2d 266, 270 (Minn. 1977). II. The Moorhead Municipal Code defines a variance as a "relaxation of the terms of the zoning ordinance," and it authorizes variances for, among other things, setback requirements. Moorhead, Minn., Municipal Code §§ 10 -1 -5, 10 -2A -5 (1988). The Moorhead Municipal Code states: It is further the intent of this Title that the nonconformities shall not be enlarged upon, expanded or extended, nor be used as grounds for adding other structures or uses not permitted in the district. Moorhead, Minn., Municipal Code § 10 -2C -1 (1988). Nonconformities include conditions that were lawful when built, but are unlawful under existing zoning laws. Id. The existing Trinity building is three feet from the property line, but the distance is legal because it was "grandfathered in." Rowell argues the addition expands a nonconformity and thus violates section 10 -2C -1. [3] The interpretation of an existing ordinance is a question of law for the court. Amcon Corp. v. City of Eagan, 348 N.W.2d 66, 72 (Minn.1984). The Page 5 of 8 Page 4 zoning variance authorized by sections 10 -1 -5 and 10 -2A -5 arguably conflicts with the result otherwise dictated by section 10 -2C -1. We are required, however, to attempt to construe the provisions together. See Minn.Stat. § 645.26, subd. 1 (1988). In doing so, we interpret the provisions most consistent with the underlying purposes of the zoning. code and construe them in favor of the property owner and against Moorhead. Amcon Corp., 348 N.W.2d at 72. The interpretation a city gives its ordinances is entitled to some weight. Chanhassen Estates Residents Association . v. City of Chanhassen, 342 N.W.2d 335, 340 (Minn. 1984). Section 10 -2C -1 does not specifically prohibit variances. Its prohibition against enlarging, expanding, or extending nonconformities can be read to mean that . Trinity is prohibited from building. its proposed addition closer to the property line than the current three feet. In other words, building two feet from the property line would extend or enlarge the existing three foot nonconformity. The variance granted under section 10 -2A -5 can thus be read as consistent with section 10 -2C -1, and if so construed, does not prohibit the variance in this case. III. [4] The deciding vote granting the variance was cast by a financially contributing member of Trinity. A public officer who is authorized to take part in any manner in making a contract in his official capacity shall not voluntarily have a personal financial interest in that contract, or personally benefit financially therefrom. Minn.Stat. § 471.87 (1988). The term "contract" in section 471.87 has been broadly construed See E.T.O., Inc. v. Town of Marion, 375 N.W.2d 815, 819 -20 (Minn.1985) (holding section 471.87 applies by analogy to issuance of a liquor license). The seminal case discussing an impermissible interest is Lenz v. Coon Creek Watershed District, 278 Minn. 1, 153 N.W.2d 209 (1967). The Lenz court held a public official is disqualified if he or she has a direct interest in the outcome of the matter under consideration. The factors to determine whether such an interest exists include: © 2006 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works. 1,�+,.• / / „ri »4.�,POt1a.i, rnm /.iP1;..Pn, htm19i1Pet =aM;?r format= l4TMT .RJ?rrlatairi= Rt1(1SSR(1t1(ltln 5/17. /1XV1 ii 446 N.W.2d 917 446 N.W.2d 917 (Cite as: 446 N.W.2d 917) (1) the nature of the decision being made; (2) the nature of the pecuniary interest; (3) the number of officials making the decision who are interested; *921 (4) the need, if any, to have interested persons make the decision; and (5) the other means available, if any, such as the opportunity for review, that serve to insure that the officials will not act arbitrarily to fwther their selfish interests. Id. at 15, 153 N.W.2d at 219. The Lenz court applied its test to find officials who owned land in the district to be benefited by the official action were not per se disqualified from voting. Id. at 16, 153 N.W.2d at 220. Here, the nature of the pecuniary interest was such that it could not reasonably have influenced the voting Board member. We agree that the Board member had a non - pecuniary interest in the general welfare of Trinity. This interest, however, is not likely to_ be_contra_ry__to the interests of the general. public. To disqualify city officials from matters in which their church has an interest would unnecessarily tie the hands of city agencies. City agencies would be particularly affected in smaller towns, where the likelihood of a city official being a member of the local church is greater. A Board member's membership in Trinity, without evidence of a closer connection, is not a sufficiently direct interest in the outcome of the matter under consideration to justify setting aside Moorhead's action. See Shelton v. City of College Station, 780 F.2d 475, 485 -86 (5th Cir.1986) (en bane) (church member. not disqualified from voting on zoning matter opposed by church), cert. denied,. 479 U.S. 822, 107 S.Ct. 89, 93 L.Ed.2d 41 (1986). IV. Finally, Rowell argues the Board's grant of a variance is void because Trinity failed to demonstrate undue hardship. A reviewing court will set aside a city's decision in a zoning variance matter if the decision is unreasonable. VanLandschoot, 336 N.W.2d at 508; Tuckner v. Township of May, 419 N.W.2d 836, 838 (Minn.Ct.App.1988). Reasonableness is measured Page 6 of 8 Page 5 by the standards set out in the city's ordinances. YanLandschoot, 336 N.W.2d at 508 n. 6; Castle Design & Development Co., Inc. v. City of Lake Elmo, 396 N.W.2d 578, 581 (Minn.Ct.App.1986). We will not invalidate Moorhead's zoning variance decision if Moorhead acted in good faith and within the broad discretion accorded it by statutes and ordinances. VanLandschoot, 336 N.W.2d at 509. Moorhead's decision will only be reversed if its stated reasons are legally insufficient or without factual basis. Northwestern College v. City of Arden Hills, 281 N.W.2d 865, 868 (Minn. 1979). A city's authority to grant variances cannot exceed the powers granted by Minn.Stat. § 462.357, subd. 6(2). Costley v. Caromin House, Inc., 313 N.W.2d 21, 27 (Minn.1981). The statutory authority allows variances in cases of "undue hardship" where: Mhe property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls, the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property .not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. Minn.Stat. § 462.357, subd. 6(2) (1988). The Moorhead Municipal Code also authorizes variances only upon a showing of "undue hardship" Moorhead, Minn., Municipal Code §§ 10 -1 -5, 10- 2A -5(B). By adopting the precise language of the enabling statute, the Moorhead ordinances grant the zoning authority the same power to grant variances as is allowed by Minn.Stat. § 462.357, subd. 6(2). Thus, if the variance is permitted by the statute, it is also permitted by the ordinance. According to the stipulated facts, strict enforcement of Moorhead's setback requirement would require Trinity's addition to be built 22 feet back from the front line of the existing building. The Board's written decision found that enforcing the setback requirement would create hardship for m 2006 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. U.S. GovL Works. httn• / /nrint wentlaw rnm /de.live.rv.html ?dept= atn&format =HTMLE &dataid= B0055800000... 5/12/2006 446 N.W.2d 917 446 N.W.2d 917 (Cite as: 446 N.W.2d 917) Trinity because the addition would not be coordinated with the existing structure. The roof lines and front line would not *922 match, the internal corridors would be misaligned, and the classroom windows, exit routes and classroom configurations would be adversely affected. All these findings are supported by the evidence presented to the.Board at the public. hearings, either in testimonial form or from the blueprints of the addition plans. [5] We believe these circumstances satisfy the requirements for undue hardship as defined by Minn.Stat. § 462.357, subd. 6(2). The first requirement is that the property cannot be put to a reasonable use without the variance. This provision does not mean that a property owner must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. In such a case the constitution would compel a variance regardless of the statute. See Holasek v. Village of Medina, 303 Minn. 240, 244, 226 N.W.2d 900, 903 (1975). The statute is clearly intended to allow cities the flexibility to grant variances in cases where the constitution does not compel it. Thus, we read the first part of the definition of "undue hardship" as requiring a showing that the property owner would like 'to use the property in a reasonable manner that is prohibited by the ordinance. On the facts of this case, the precise issue is whether it would be reasonable to expect Trinity to build its addition 22 feet back from the front line of the existing building. If evidence supports the Board's fording that building 22 feet back would be an unreasonable use, we must affirm. The statute and ordinances unfortunately provide no standard for determining reasonableness. Minnesota courts distinguish between area and use variances. In re Appeal of Kenney, 374 N.W.2d 271, 274 (Minn. 1985). An exemption from a setback requirement is an area variance. Id. Practical difficulties may justify an area variance. See Merriam Park Community Council, Inc. v. McDonough, 297 Minn. 285, 292, 210 N.W.2d 416, 420 (1973) (holding sufficient "practical difficulties" existed to justify area variance), overruled on other grounds, Northwestern College Page 7 of 8 Page 6 v. City of Arden Hills, 281 N.W.2d 865, 868 n. 4 (Minn.1979); Curry v. Young, 285 Minn. 387, 396 -97, 173 N.W.2d 410, 415 (1969) (holding variance required where setback requirement would force property owner to build much smaller structure); see generally 3 R. Anderson, American Law of Zoning §§ 20.49 -.52 (3d ed. 1986) (analyzing court decisions on area variances). The evidence before the Board supported its determination that requiring Trinity to build its addition 22 feet back from the existing building is unreasonable. The Board properly considered the practical difficulties strict enforcement of the setback requirement would cause, including the functional and aesthetic concerns mentioned above. [6] The second requirement is that the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. The record reveals the existing church has only a three -foot setback because it was built before the enactment of the present ordinance. This is a unique circumstance not created by the landowner. [7] The third requirement for undue hardship is that the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Since the church already exists, an addition will not alter the character of the locality. The Board carefully conditioned its variance on Trinity's promise to plant trees, place planters along the facade of the addition, and preserve the existing courtyard and playgrounds. We think these precautions guard against any alteration of the character of the locality. Thus, the variance ordinance and statute have been satisfied, and Moorhead's finding of undue hardship is supported by the record. DECISION Trinity's failure to comply with the procedural requirements in applying for a variance is not grounds for setting aside the Board's decision. The variance did not violate the ordinance prohibiting expansion of nonconformities. The Board's decision was not invalid because a voting member was a member of Trinity. Finally, the Board's *923 finding of undue hardship was supported by the ® 2006 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works. httn-// nrint. wpgtlaw .rnmldelive.rv.html ?r1PCt =atnk format= HTMT.F.Rrdataid= RO055R00000... 5/19/9.006 446 N.W.2d 917 446 N.W.2d 917 (Cite as: 446 N.W.2d 917) record. Affirmed. 446 N.W.2d 917 END OF DOCUMENT C 2006 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works. Page 8 of 8 Page 7 hth,- //print.vactla.v rnm /ApNi Pry html9ripat =atnRr format= 14TMT.r.keintairl= nnns5R(1( nnn viwmm Jackie Hoogenakker From: Patrick B. Steinhoff [pbs @mgmllp.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 11:53 AM Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Cypress Equities application Ms. Hoogenakker: Would you please add this email to the record before the City Council tonight regarding the Cypress Equities matter? Thank you. We have just now reviewed the letter dated May 11, 2006 submitted by counsel for Cypress Equities. For the same reasons set forth in our Memorandum to the City Council dated May 12, 2006, we believe that the arguments of Cypress Equities' counsel are wrong and that the City has no legal authority to grant Cypress Equities the requested variance. Bruce D. Malkerson Patrick B. Steinhoff MALKERSON GILLILAND MARTIN LLP 220 South Sixth Street, Suite 1900 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Phone: 612 - 344 - 1111 /Direct 612 -455 -6649 Fax: 612- 344 -1414 pbs @mgmllp.com The information contained in this message is attorney - client privileged and confidential information intended only for use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone at 1- 612 - 344 -1111 or reply email notification and delete the original message. ,p h. _ .;IRCULAR 230 NOTICE In compliance with IRS requirements, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties or in connection with marketing or promotional materials. Thank you J 5/16/2006 6 s a w 11 2901=11 Cypress Equities 15601 Dallas Parkway, Suite 400 Addison, Texas 75001 Contact: Brett Witzig - Phone: (972) 361 -5033 Fax: (972) 361 -5928 PLANNER /ENGINEER McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc 14800 28th Avenue North, Suite 140 Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 Phone: (763) 476 -6010 Fax: (763) 476 -8532 Contact: Sean L. Cullen E —Mail: scullen®mfro.com LAND SURVEYOR McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. 14800 28th Avenue North, Suite 140 Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 Phone: (763) 476 -6010 Fax: (763) 476 -8532 ARHITECT Good Fulton & Farrell 2808 Fairmount Suite 300 Dallas, Texas 75201 Contact: Scott A. Sower Phone: (214) 203 -1500 Fax: (214) 303 -1512 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc 14800 28th Avenue North, Suite 140 Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 Phone: (763) 476 -6010 Fax: (763) 476 -8532 Contact: Kathy O'Connell E —Mail: koconnell®mfro.com Site Development Plans for The District Edina, Minnesota Presented by: Cypress Equities jj U ,� i �f souMdNe m i - < < wrou romstw om.-, Ua anew. � J.E r : IF-1 ,,,�a.n e Ntie� y 1 - t w7ay any, s.evm =' . -re:r i {� , . •- j - r i i�LJC LJ- pch ,� 6 h Sl ccncEu�._. -..iJ 7 If4 �LJ_ 200m a \`I= e � ^Ij �IOOU �-- teaooYv.i».t \/IrIKIITV RZIAD 111Mi.7N:1111Ii CITY SUBMITTAL ISSUED 03/08/06 D o N °T R EM p VE FROM COLN cIL CN0gERS PRIVATE UTILITY CONTACTS Time Warner (Cable Television) 9705 Data Park Minnetonka, Mn 55343 Phone: 952- 607 -4230 Contact: Joe Thrill Qwest (Phone) 6244 Cedar Ave. So, Richfield, Mn 55423 Phone: 612-798-7701 Fax: 612-861-8173 Contact: Dan Johnston Email: dpiohn (@gwest.com Xcel Energy (Electric) 5309 West 70th Street Edina, Mn 55439 Phone 952-829-4574 Contact Doug Cabak Email: douglas .m.cabak(ti�xcelenergy.com CenterPoint Energy (Gas) 700 West Linden Ave. Minneapolis, Mn 5 5440 -1 165 Phone: 612 -321 -4304 Contact: Mark Spamon Email: mark .spanton(dcenterpointenernY.com SHEET INDEX C.1.01 TITLE SHEET C.2.01 EXISTING CONDITIONS C.3.01 REMOVAL & DEMOLITION PLAN C.4.01 SITE PLAN C.5.01 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C.6.01 -04 EROSION CONTROL PLAN C.7.01 -04 UTILITY PLAN C.8.01 -03 STORM SEWER PLAN C.9.01 -03 DETAIL SHEET L.1.01 -11 LANDSCAPE PLAN w U a t= 0 =3 c_n z °' V) N W a N LLJ ? LLJ F to 0- ~ U n y eehh ecnl°. m >< o mpa N O m a q E� ors 00 0 0 c o O o {J a 0 v 5 my� omco m s 0 omm° d o °ogo, n z —a =J 5Emo <i _VJ J O ° g ° m A mm .. mEE m r > ° c _ ° o WIZ 0 co o � a- o qg� m g o� W d < SHEET NUMBO REV. C.1.01 B MM nz , Ism 6 I A.: -IT I I .0 �..� r . 656.5 I Irk - -- tT . .1 , 850.4 _N ` I I . 858.4 . 658.9 . t \ 1 . 8564 . 85B.4 8 I P I__ i / I ees AR6855,, �� 3T=-i�j &1� a>e., : BS9.3--- -+-j L'R11 1C ,657.7 I � `` _ -. 6563 wv.:65,., L•r l - -r �- X61 >- �- >'� c• \ 8563 // / \�•.� �� __ ° 9.0 sR4l\ •.RA ' $rte. "--;� I I i / \ DOG/ .857.7 \ erv.:.e 850 - •657. 1 I - , f ` 1 -O DRIT/. DDC1Nll AND �8.5& UONY, 6DEW" ADD LANDSCAPE ADL656e 0 0 I \ er 1 R I , EASMOI7 PER . 954.5 I 1 " 9 8 25 461. - _ t ' - - - - - - -- VL' \ fir RCP \ Ps/1. 14 SPACES } / s.o / 657.4 a 857.1 - '� - ; 12 SPACES / �� `I } 4 2• 9 FT. HIGH. -�'� .., 859.. a ReeuT \I I I i I \\ 1\ if 1.0 FT. WIDE WALL /: i•.. y`1..: ,�o��'��0 } \ ` BIM WALL: 855.59 `^" N IN 1 {\`. 1.0 FT. WIDE WALL O co I I v 4\1 BTM WALL: 855.88 C:) MIJ \\ 12 SPACES 1� \` I 1• r�, 1 ♦ .856.7 \ \ . ast. BsT F 860.6 1 :I ♦ �t1D�i ♦\ 13 SPACES ..__ ",..�.re -A.n' ` _ 851.5 \ _ I i l I V. ` I •1 �^, i 6W* AHD LAHDSGOE A1C� \ ` "' // n/ \ / - t . '"+ -23.50 Viii . 86,.5 I it , 1 rAS°a6Pea oo�e\M°eu `� \� I S� \\ .855,5 1% ` - , 36.1 ' /n - �'' •� S89 °51 r4 3 "W I Y i I Ir ^ 1$ CES \\ \1 Y ° a t Sa 7 - m ! \ \ Y J LEGEN .856.9 �1 ! \ / r.r -. EXISTING , ":\ / 15 SPA�6SBZ'" I` \ 1 ( - _ _ = -__ -� 1 nits • POUND MONUMENT - >- SANITARY SEWER \ Q ( e,e x7.35 \ Y` '\ ,H„ _. .. _... _ / N¢nite .855.0 \/\ \ ♦�1 '\ •-. •� \,.r,:::/ i / eR;�6z _� O MANHOLE -» -STORM SEWER t +•' � `., � � • Pa9.b ' $ UTILITY POLE - ' -WATER MAIN \ FLARED END SECTION -a- OVERHEAD WIRES ' 1 J I q \ jt \ > 9545 \f 855,2 I - ,e °13.00 BARB WIRE FENCE - -- EDGE OF TREES i 1 \... -f: ^ o I ° n //-/-///-BUILDING UNE WETLAND .062.4 n I I 955.8 ♦ BR \ 1! x89 51'43 E I i v '� - i5_SPACES �� \ tee,.,» \ ' \ . Bsas � � . /+ � i I :_ - CONTOUR + 57119 & 820 -_ -,::[ : __ / J (SOIL BORING- APPROX. LOC.) .956.6 .856.21_' 7 ♦ _ \. .j-, 511 i I t N Il \ J �.- ` \\ � / ":::; 6 i� 1 ill ,, i v3 ^ _ ,_! / . i5.7 �y 1 l_f ° -'- _ 4 fi \ I I i , C5T / / t \ \ \ e�} I R$_ _ 1'-to L. sa. 47.0 • 856.6 ' ,P V S ACES . 052.9 \ 1 II � � d / r B5Do. // s1v- Rbl; ' SPACES / y - I `�•� � _�; � I : // 18 / tom: � 0 � + '', i! 3 -. ,• ;�„� .1851,6 't tram Od 1 I / FEW" EA"On 1 I 1 1'" PM OOOAOIT N5 9246677 pCs . 85ts -h VI- SP . 1 } 1S ' ✓ I I . �3 2- ,1211. ,2' R� m.Ux t \ \ 1 \ III I l / J e5o. E,. s,. smut u6r 6 L r..r AM Y 27.,9 ACES/ bYV107.3tl.fzz•AS) 1\ 4 .862.7 856.2 1 s SP / X r " / j =653.5 t _ - I- ' W63z.6 &E. 1-42' i ,r 855.7 AY l / PACES =aso.6 ne�s Y.'. \�� ` f -\ as7.� �, 1 PER / . ' PER mG 57x)57 z=:_:-- I= i i / /� • \� _ - ' • 961.5 1 7�v1AU... iG 7 Oi `�r16'.0,�.tr7�1.r�•�O'..�.'m. t\ •�� 1 201 js� �, "v 2g�y�r a{ �\ ' THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PUNS Is A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL C. 7x15 QUALITY LEVEL WAS °ETENIWED T� } 0 A yWEaL� j •A t tOp ,y�y.- 152.22 ACCORDING TO THE GUDELBIES OF CBASCE 35-OZ. TITLED 'STANDARD QINEIRFS FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICT04 OF EXISTING t` ..__ ",..�.re -A.n' ` _ 851.5 \ _ I i l I V. ` I •1 �^, i 6W* AHD LAHDSGOE A1C� \ ` "' // n/ \ / - t . '"+ -23.50 Viii . 86,.5 I it , 1 rAS°a6Pea oo�e\M°eu `� \� I S� \\ .855,5 1% ` - , 36.1 ' /n - �'' •� S89 °51 r4 3 "W I Y i I Ir ^ 1$ CES \\ \1 Y ° a t Sa 7 - m ! \ \ Y J LEGEN .856.9 �1 ! \ / r.r -. EXISTING , ":\ / 15 SPA�6SBZ'" I` \ 1 ( - _ _ = -__ -� 1 nits • POUND MONUMENT - >- SANITARY SEWER \ Q ( e,e x7.35 \ Y` '\ ,H„ _. .. _... _ / N¢nite .855.0 \/\ \ ♦�1 '\ •-. •� \,.r,:::/ i / eR;�6z _� O MANHOLE -» -STORM SEWER t +•' � `., � � • Pa9.b ' $ UTILITY POLE - ' -WATER MAIN \ FLARED END SECTION -a- OVERHEAD WIRES ' 1 J I q \ jt \ > 9545 \f 855,2 I - ,e °13.00 BARB WIRE FENCE - -- EDGE OF TREES i 1 \... -f: ^ o I ° n //-/-///-BUILDING UNE WETLAND .062.4 n I I 955.8 ♦ BR \ 1! x89 51'43 E I i v '� - i5_SPACES �� \ tee,.,» \ ' \ . Bsas � � . /+ � i I :_ - CONTOUR + 57119 & 820 -_ -,::[ : __ / J (SOIL BORING- APPROX. LOC.) .956.6 .856.21_' 7 ♦ _ \. .j-, 511 i I t N Il \ J �.- ` \\ � / ":::; 6 i� 1 ill ,, i v3 ^ _ ,_! / . i5.7 �y 1 l_f ° -'- _ 4 fi \ I I i , C5T / / t \ \ \ e�} I R$_ _ 1'-to L. sa. 47.0 • 856.6 ' ,P V S ACES . 052.9 \ 1 II � � d / r B5Do. // s1v- Rbl; ' SPACES / y - I `�•� � _�; � I : // 18 / tom: � 0 � + '', i! 3 -. ,• ;�„� .1851,6 't tram Od 1 I / FEW" EA"On 1 I 1 1'" PM OOOAOIT N5 9246677 pCs . 85ts -h VI- SP . 1 } 1S ' ✓ I I . �3 2- ,1211. ,2' R� m.Ux t \ \ 1 \ III I l / J e5o. E,. s,. smut u6r 6 L r..r AM Y 27.,9 ACES/ bYV107.3tl.fzz•AS) 1\ 4 .862.7 856.2 1 s SP / X r " / j =653.5 t _ - I- ' W63z.6 &E. 1-42' i ,r 855.7 AY l / PACES =aso.6 ne�s Y.'. \�� ` f -\ .853.7 ! 1a SPACES B 2.T, -- EASE1' AID sIOCWA t ' 7 , i , PER / . ' PER mG 57x)57 z=:_:-- I= i i / /� • \� _ - ' • 961.5 1 7�v1AU... iG 7 Oi `�r16'.0,�.tr7�1.r�•�O'..�.'m. t\ •�� 1 201 js� �, "v 2g�y�r a{ �\ ' THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PUNS Is A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL C. 7x15 QUALITY LEVEL WAS °ETENIWED T� } 0 A yWEaL� j •A t tOp ,y�y.- 152.22 ACCORDING TO THE GUDELBIES OF CBASCE 35-OZ. TITLED 'STANDARD QINEIRFS FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICT04 OF EXISTING t` E �7 . ./ +. 7� "� 0 SUBSIRFACE UR1TY DATA" THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR "CONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING .0• ; •��esgbe �/ 1x89 51.43 "E U7W11E5 BEFORE caMMENaTC 1YORK BY CONTACTING THE NOTE CATION IHIIEA (CIPHER STATE alE raH IA HBE507A) THE CQITRACIOR > , tea/. .��. AND /OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE 70 BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, MUCH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY MS OR HER mom • FAILURE TO EXfAMY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD) 0°j I X I .. 1)56 ' - . / /: ',� eS5 Yer °. ]eR - kD6om - eSO, N] i h F THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TIE MITHIN THE SITE. HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENCINNEERR 711TH THE LOCATION. SIZE, INVERT AND F THE 111E LINE IS ACTIVE NO ACTIVE DRAIN THE SHALL BE BACIFRLED VATHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER ..__ ",..�.re -A.n' ` _ 851.5 \ _ I i l I V. ` I •1 �^, i 6W* AHD LAHDSGOE A1C� \ ` "' // n/ \ / - t . '"+ -23.50 Viii . 86,.5 I it , 1 rAS°a6Pea oo�e\M°eu `� \� I S� \\ .855,5 1% ` - , 36.1 ' /n - �'' •� S89 °51 r4 3 "W I Y i I Ir ^ 1$ CES \\ \1 Y ° a t Sa 7 - m ! \ \ Y J LEGEN .856.9 �1 ! \ / r.r -. EXISTING , ":\ / 15 SPA�6SBZ'" I` \ 1 ( - _ _ = -__ -� 1 nits • POUND MONUMENT - >- SANITARY SEWER \ Q ( e,e x7.35 \ Y` '\ ,H„ _. .. _... _ / N¢nite .855.0 \/\ \ ♦�1 '\ •-. •� \,.r,:::/ i / eR;�6z _� O MANHOLE -» -STORM SEWER t +•' � `., � � • Pa9.b ' $ UTILITY POLE - ' -WATER MAIN \ FLARED END SECTION -a- OVERHEAD WIRES ' 1 J I q \ jt \ > 9545 \f 855,2 I - ,e °13.00 BARB WIRE FENCE - -- EDGE OF TREES i 1 \... -f: ^ o I ° n //-/-///-BUILDING UNE WETLAND .062.4 n I I 955.8 ♦ BR \ 1! x89 51'43 E I i v '� - i5_SPACES �� \ tee,.,» \ ' \ . Bsas � � . /+ � i I :_ - CONTOUR + 57119 & 820 -_ -,::[ : __ / J (SOIL BORING- APPROX. LOC.) .956.6 .856.21_' 7 ♦ _ \. .j-, 511 i I t N Il \ J �.- ` \\ � / ":::; 6 i� 1 ill ,, i v3 ^ _ ,_! / . i5.7 �y 1 l_f ° -'- _ 4 fi \ I I i , C5T / / t \ \ \ e�} I R$_ _ 1'-to L. sa. 47.0 • 856.6 ' ,P V S ACES . 052.9 \ 1 II � � d / r B5Do. // s1v- Rbl; ' SPACES / y - I `�•� � _�; � I : // 18 / tom: � 0 � + '', i! 3 -. ,• ;�„� .1851,6 't tram Od 1 I / FEW" EA"On 1 I 1 1'" PM OOOAOIT N5 9246677 pCs . 85ts -h VI- SP . 1 } 1S ' ✓ I I . �3 2- ,1211. ,2' R� m.Ux t \ \ 1 \ III I l / J e5o. E,. s,. smut u6r 6 L r..r AM Y 27.,9 ACES/ bYV107.3tl.fzz•AS) 1\ 4 .862.7 856.2 1 s SP / X r " / j =653.5 t _ - I- ' W63z.6 &E. 1-42' i ,r 855.7 AY l / PACES =aso.6 ne�s Y.'. \�� ` f -\ 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET N W N UQE o o M F w Q Z (n ? W c°0 N 0 a W Z Z W � LO W U � g�oHv J yo`}e h 4iehh curb.^ .0 Q�ek _O moo N $4 .0 a CE 1 Q � W z z Q Q HA N 0 0 0 T3 o� noco .1- C coo0 ,° a nRF� X08 U' c YEmo v u ° oE E9 E m i a in z° 0° g `a 0 a w O 8 N� O SHEET NUmm REV. C.2.01 A MFRA FEE / 15306 .853.7 ! 1a SPACES B 2.T, -- EASE1' AID sIOCWA t ' 7 , i , PER / . ' PER mG 57x)57 z=:_:-- I= i i / /� • \� _ - ' • 961.5 1 7�v1AU... iG 7 Oi `�r16'.0,�.tr7�1.r�•�O'..�.'m. t\ •�� 1 201 js� �, "v 2g�y�r a{ �\ ' THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PUNS Is A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL C. 7x15 QUALITY LEVEL WAS °ETENIWED T� } 0 A yWEaL� j •A t tOp ,y�y.- 152.22 ACCORDING TO THE GUDELBIES OF CBASCE 35-OZ. TITLED 'STANDARD QINEIRFS FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICT04 OF EXISTING t` E �7 . ./ +. 7� "� 0 SUBSIRFACE UR1TY DATA" THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR "CONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING .0• ; •��esgbe �/ 1x89 51.43 "E U7W11E5 BEFORE caMMENaTC 1YORK BY CONTACTING THE NOTE CATION IHIIEA (CIPHER STATE alE raH IA HBE507A) THE CQITRACIOR > , tea/. .��. AND /OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE 70 BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, MUCH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY MS OR HER • FAILURE TO EXfAMY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD) 0°j I X I .. 1)56 ' - . / /: ',� eS5 Yer °. ]eR - kD6om - eSO, N] i h F THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TIE MITHIN THE SITE. HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENCINNEERR 711TH THE LOCATION. SIZE, INVERT AND F THE 111E LINE IS ACTIVE NO ACTIVE DRAIN THE SHALL BE BACIFRLED VATHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET N W N UQE o o M F w Q Z (n ? W c°0 N 0 a W Z Z W � LO W U � g�oHv J yo`}e h 4iehh curb.^ .0 Q�ek _O moo N $4 .0 a CE 1 Q � W z z Q Q HA N 0 0 0 T3 o� noco .1- C coo0 ,° a nRF� X08 U' c YEmo v u ° oE E9 E m i a in z° 0° g `a 0 a w O 8 N� O SHEET NUmm REV. C.2.01 A MFRA FEE / 15306 60.5 n LF ]Y RCP 75' -7T' RCP BDA wV fiSR4 it ... Fa II :� E -t- I 8 I O 1 ©RM:fi Wfi NV.: BSB.fi 14 SPACES 12 SPACES 6 O 12 SPACES 13 SPACES ------------------------------ - - - --I 1' O �-- tr� A u� I 1 � O 15 SPACES wN°'7i�d m, -fi.7.5 bCl 6 15 SPACES Q W � U N � <F n \ \ \ \ 117 SPACI 18 SPACES 18 SPACES 18 SPACES O Iis1-' o 4 1� . I1i�011 \ MV. 811.5 —�8 SPACE�_�T 18 SPACE\ ✓d.`sj1� RW: B57.B WY. 617.5 N.N. (]Y RCP) I- mV U2. i[. (�43 ILO') I` 1- f 3 '� ,�'i O T----- - - - - -- 2 -III L.F. 42' RCP to .3x I - III LF. 47' RCP 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET DEMOLITION PLAN NOTES: 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEMOLITION. REMOVAL, AND DISPOSING IN A LOCATION APPROVED BY ALL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES, OF ALL STRUCTURES, PADS WALLS, RUUMES, FOUNDATIONS, PARING DRIVES, DRAINAGE, STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, ET6. SUCH THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE REMAINING PLANS CAN BE C06MCYM ALL FAClfRES TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE UNDERCUT TO SUITABLE MATERIAL AND MUM TO GRADE WITH SUITABLE COMPACTED FILL MATERIAL PER THE SPECIFICATIONS. 2. THE CONTRACTOR 6 RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING ALL DEBRIS FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSING THE DEBRIS N A LAWFUL MANNER. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTANING ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR DEMOLITION AND DISPOSAL 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL AND /OR RELOCATION OF UTIUTES THE CONTRACTOR SMALL COORDINATE WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY CONCERNING PORTIONS OF WORK WHICH MAY BE PERFORMED BY THE UTILITY COMPANIES FORCES AND ANY FEES WHICH ARE TO BE PAID TO THE UTILITY COMPANY FOR THEIR SERVICES THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYNG ALL FEES AND CHARGES 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPOSOLE FOR THE DISCOWECTION OF UTILITY SERVICES TO THE EXISTING BUILDINGS PRIOR TD DEMOITION OF THE BUILDINGS S THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAVE BEEN DETERMINED FROM THE BEST INFORMATION AVAILABLE AND ARE GIVER FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR. THE ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR ACCURACY. PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY DEMOLITION ACTIVITY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE UTILITY COMPANIES FOR ONSITE LOCATIONS OF DOSTING U7I17ES. 6. ALL EXISTING SEWERS, PIPING AND UTILITIES SAWN ARE NOT M BE N70MEMD AS THE EXACT LOCATION, OR AS THE ONLY OBSTACLES THAT MAY OCCUR ON THE SITE VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROCEED WITH CAU710N AROUND ANY ANTICIPATED FEATURES GIVE NOTICE TO ALL UTILITY COMPANIES REGARDING DESTRUCTION AND REMOVAL OF ALL SERVICE LINES AND CAP ALL UNES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK UTIIBES DETERMINED TO BE ABANDONED AND LEFT IN PUCE SHALL BE GROUTED IF UNDER BUILDING 7. ELECTRICAL. TELEPHONE, CABLE, WATER FlBER OPTIC CABLE AND /Ot GAS LINES NEEDING TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE AFFECTED UTIUTY COMPANY. ADEQUATE TIME SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR RELOCATION AND CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY IS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A 91OOTH TRANSITION IN UTILITY SERVICE B. CONTRACTOR MUST PROTECT THE PUBLIC AT ALL TIMES WITH FENCING, BARRICADES, ENCLOSNES, ETC., TO THE BEST PRACTICES AND APPROVED BY ENGINEER 9. CONTINUOUS ACCESS SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AT ALL TIMES DURING DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING FACHUTIES 10. PRIOR TO DEMOLITION OCCURRING, ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED. It CONTRACTOR MAY LIAR SAW -CUT & PAVEMENT REMOVAL TO ONLY THOSE AREAS WHERE 17 IS REQUIRED AS SHOWN ON THESE CONSTRUCTION PLANS BUT F ANY DAMAGE 6 INCURRED ON ANY OF THE SURROUNDING PAVEMENT, ETC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR US REMOVAL AND REPAIR. 12. DAMAGE TO ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS TO REMAIN WILL BE REPLACED AT CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. 13. EXISTING BUILDINGS ARE TO BE REMOVED BY OTHERS 14. EXISTING GAS AND ELECTRIC TO BE REMOVED BY OTHERS, CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY. 0 NOTES: 1 REMOVE EXOSDNG PIPE UP 70 MAN. 2 RELOCATE EXISTING STRUCTURE 3 REMOVE EXISTING BITUMINOUS /CONCRETE /CURB. 4 REMOVE EXISTING BUILDING. 5 REMOVE EXISTING WATERMAIN. 6 ALL BITUMINOUS /CONCRETE /CURB LOCATED ON PROPERTY TO BE REMOVED. LEGEND: ® EXISTING UTILITY TO BE REMOVED ® EXISTING BITUMINOUS /CONCRETE /CURB TO BE REMOVED R I I I • FOUND MONUMENT — > —SANITARY I 2 I I O jIxr.e.fi.. SEWER I� RM: Wsu I u I N UTILITY POLE — I —WATER MAIN I� FLARED END SECTION —OVERHEAD — OVERHEAD WIRES LIB WIRE FENCE EDGE OF TREES I I BUILDING LINE / —CONTOUR + ST119 & B20 I (SOIL BORING- APPROX. LOC.) 1 I PROPOSED ' I MANHOLE — >— SANITARY SEWER I CATCH BASIN —>>—STORM SEWER -1 HYDRANT DRAIN TILE x4 GATE VALVE ♦ FLARED END SECTION Rrv.:Rwa �L RIM: BHfi.S MAIN —G— UNDERGROUND GAS —E—UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC —T— UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE I 17' RCP I i 1 / _ • - -- 2 -III L.F. 42' RCP to .3x I - III LF. 47' RCP 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET DEMOLITION PLAN NOTES: 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEMOLITION. REMOVAL, AND DISPOSING IN A LOCATION APPROVED BY ALL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES, OF ALL STRUCTURES, PADS WALLS, RUUMES, FOUNDATIONS, PARING DRIVES, DRAINAGE, STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, ET6. SUCH THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE REMAINING PLANS CAN BE C06MCYM ALL FAClfRES TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE UNDERCUT TO SUITABLE MATERIAL AND MUM TO GRADE WITH SUITABLE COMPACTED FILL MATERIAL PER THE SPECIFICATIONS. 2. THE CONTRACTOR 6 RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING ALL DEBRIS FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSING THE DEBRIS N A LAWFUL MANNER. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTANING ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR DEMOLITION AND DISPOSAL 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL AND /OR RELOCATION OF UTIUTES THE CONTRACTOR SMALL COORDINATE WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY CONCERNING PORTIONS OF WORK WHICH MAY BE PERFORMED BY THE UTILITY COMPANIES FORCES AND ANY FEES WHICH ARE TO BE PAID TO THE UTILITY COMPANY FOR THEIR SERVICES THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYNG ALL FEES AND CHARGES 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPOSOLE FOR THE DISCOWECTION OF UTILITY SERVICES TO THE EXISTING BUILDINGS PRIOR TD DEMOITION OF THE BUILDINGS S THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAVE BEEN DETERMINED FROM THE BEST INFORMATION AVAILABLE AND ARE GIVER FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR. THE ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR ACCURACY. PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY DEMOLITION ACTIVITY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE UTILITY COMPANIES FOR ONSITE LOCATIONS OF DOSTING U7I17ES. 6. ALL EXISTING SEWERS, PIPING AND UTILITIES SAWN ARE NOT M BE N70MEMD AS THE EXACT LOCATION, OR AS THE ONLY OBSTACLES THAT MAY OCCUR ON THE SITE VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROCEED WITH CAU710N AROUND ANY ANTICIPATED FEATURES GIVE NOTICE TO ALL UTILITY COMPANIES REGARDING DESTRUCTION AND REMOVAL OF ALL SERVICE LINES AND CAP ALL UNES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK UTIIBES DETERMINED TO BE ABANDONED AND LEFT IN PUCE SHALL BE GROUTED IF UNDER BUILDING 7. ELECTRICAL. TELEPHONE, CABLE, WATER FlBER OPTIC CABLE AND /Ot GAS LINES NEEDING TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE AFFECTED UTIUTY COMPANY. ADEQUATE TIME SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR RELOCATION AND CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY IS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A 91OOTH TRANSITION IN UTILITY SERVICE B. CONTRACTOR MUST PROTECT THE PUBLIC AT ALL TIMES WITH FENCING, BARRICADES, ENCLOSNES, ETC., TO THE BEST PRACTICES AND APPROVED BY ENGINEER 9. CONTINUOUS ACCESS SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AT ALL TIMES DURING DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING FACHUTIES 10. PRIOR TO DEMOLITION OCCURRING, ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED. It CONTRACTOR MAY LIAR SAW -CUT & PAVEMENT REMOVAL TO ONLY THOSE AREAS WHERE 17 IS REQUIRED AS SHOWN ON THESE CONSTRUCTION PLANS BUT F ANY DAMAGE 6 INCURRED ON ANY OF THE SURROUNDING PAVEMENT, ETC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR US REMOVAL AND REPAIR. 12. DAMAGE TO ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS TO REMAIN WILL BE REPLACED AT CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. 13. EXISTING BUILDINGS ARE TO BE REMOVED BY OTHERS 14. EXISTING GAS AND ELECTRIC TO BE REMOVED BY OTHERS, CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY. 0 NOTES: 1 REMOVE EXOSDNG PIPE UP 70 MAN. 2 RELOCATE EXISTING STRUCTURE 3 REMOVE EXISTING BITUMINOUS /CONCRETE /CURB. 4 REMOVE EXISTING BUILDING. 5 REMOVE EXISTING WATERMAIN. 6 ALL BITUMINOUS /CONCRETE /CURB LOCATED ON PROPERTY TO BE REMOVED. LEGEND: ® EXISTING UTILITY TO BE REMOVED ® EXISTING BITUMINOUS /CONCRETE /CURB TO BE REMOVED THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SNOMN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY OUAIM LEVEL C THIS DUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CNASCE 38-02. TITLED 'STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR 7HE COLLECTOR AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA' THE CONTRACTOR AND /OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR TEA FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE VATHIN THE SITE HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION. SIZE INVERT AND IF THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO ACTIVE DRAIN TIE SHALL BE BACKETLED WTHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER Z W a V a F ZO O 0 G � J w O N Z w W m N o M a N z w W o w � j O U Ld w K th g 41 ( Vh c b �h b b h.4 eo C K� e ` N e a �a¢ Ib H c == J � � a a ✓P � 0 0 v m � o t a" m no�0 dOW C C p2 0 O mmm ° m °, a m g m rEm of J >+mJ m J O °Oat o N h Lm0` O dEE Ea In z° o a 0 6 Q mm o •� o z > o M SHEET NUMBER REV. C.3.01 A MFRA FILE / 15306 LEGEN� EXISTING • FOUND MONUMENT — > —SANITARY SEWER O MANHOLE —" —STORM SEWER TA UTILITY POLE — I —WATER MAIN A FLARED END SECTION —OVERHEAD — OVERHEAD WIRES _BARB WIRE FENCE EDGE OF TREES / / / /// BUILDING LINE WETLAND —CONTOUR + ST119 & B20 (SOIL BORING- APPROX. LOC.) PROPOSED 0 MANHOLE — >— SANITARY SEWER 0 CATCH BASIN —>>—STORM SEWER -1 HYDRANT DRAIN TILE x4 GATE VALVE ♦ FLARED END SECTION RIPRAP —I —WATER MAIN —G— UNDERGROUND GAS —E—UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC —T— UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SNOMN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY OUAIM LEVEL C THIS DUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CNASCE 38-02. TITLED 'STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR 7HE COLLECTOR AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA' THE CONTRACTOR AND /OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR TEA FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE VATHIN THE SITE HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION. SIZE INVERT AND IF THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO ACTIVE DRAIN TIE SHALL BE BACKETLED WTHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER Z W a V a F ZO O 0 G � J w O N Z w W m N o M a N z w W o w � j O U Ld w K th g 41 ( Vh c b �h b b h.4 eo C K� e ` N e a �a¢ Ib H c == J � � a a ✓P � 0 0 v m � o t a" m no�0 dOW C C p2 0 O mmm ° m °, a m g m rEm of J >+mJ m J O °Oat o N h Lm0` O dEE Ea In z° o a 0 6 Q mm o •� o z > o M SHEET NUMBER REV. C.3.01 A MFRA FILE / 15306 we DWdE1E CURB- AM DETER s ROMWAY EASEMENT RIGHT TURN LANE (TVP -) �E SOID 4' WADE WIKE S�RPE Ld Z PROI EASEMENT / EASELQFf { LiJ U Z Q LL- DROP LANE PROPOSED 1 EASEMENT BINS IF WOE STRIPE GALLAGHER DRIVE C � REIIOYE Eli PROPOSED EXISTIO PROPOSED 2V QR®8 61R1ER ! �'�.�. __ ENIIHANQ i �--- --------- ---RTyr- Rl.t �� d! EXISTING SIDEWALK ° Mir SIDEWALK t -n - >.4 / 1 yy PLAN Sd� 3D FT. 0.0. Ris.R RAMPS U' SINGLE tl UNIT 8612 COIIG 7.JLe+i �L,.�� LZ^ _.s ONLY s C&C (T'Ra ms ms u •' +o� t *� J'< �` % ` �� u / RIGU X t • - ~EJO TANG TRAL — YG 1J LOADING DOCK I - ♦ : 2r 24 NO - $ DELIVERY ;..I rj �� M % I _ GARAGE E lb t Y I RET AP GARAGE - ,+ ,r I ENRtAIIGE,/ilOT 21u I , RE Bj I 2D.dOO 1 { _ 15K S.F. BASE SK S.f. - � 47MY - - -T -- — -- — Io FFE =868. I TDP-FLOCW- TO TERRACE PROPOSED STAIRS I" ^ RESTAURIJR PARKING tPARKMG PODIUMO(3 I cVl:+ew)sc GRADE. lu �J 0.5 24 �Tm ' �LElEt48Et01 .�a_ FFE =855.5 I LL ] - 1 Ar -- - -1 -i - -�L i RETAIL 2 II RAM — 5.240 Gg,�, �.. FFE =868 ;0 �x I ° TOP FLOOR '�. RESTAURANT ) 7K GSF UP II k 7K GSF DOWN I I FFE =853.0 s ra ;f rt ESTAURAN r I I R FFE 8E STORY * I - k �3 } If ,a II RETAIL" -3� �I .GSF_ L — _ FFE =868.0 { {I Top FLOOR �y_.r TINS i- - _ - -- - - ii±�• __ ___ }`" Y �� 4 - --.-r s,,1�3 1 ,- EMM q - -ti ♦ ACT ,. `- OF WATER m4S� --- I 6 y�Et(� � C � PARK I nPANCE IUJI�At` yr� 11 .,'� � E ,{ I „� / (TO REMAIN) W ” PROPOSED STAIRS Z< ). �. �\\PY. \ O (T TERRACE LEVEL `` - - --- .IZ :TA L4 \ 1 1rmPa 15.o0O - SF 12K GSF B SE + 3K GSF N INE ` I FFE =B 38.0 TOP FL X r {I 1 tI 1 IG DOCK NOTES: ALL CURB DIMENSIONS ARE TO BACK OF CURB ALL SITE PAVING SHALL BE HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS ~ zr I f 8612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER (TYP.) JAB III THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY GUAM LEVEL C. THIS GUAM LEVEL WAS DETERMINED EXISTING PARKING RAMP F4TaPERn LONE SUS ACCORDING UTILITY D THE OF CONTRACTOR AND/OR AND/OR SUBCON�TR�ACTOR5 4WLLDETEERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION ALLLL E OSTiNC UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WDRK BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER S7ATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND /ON SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD) 7 IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE SITE, HE OR SHE SHALL U07IFY THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION, SIM INVERT AND j IF THE 11LE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO ACTIVE DRAM TILE SHALL BE BACOBLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER. 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET N II— w C-) F= W (n a _z L3J EL M N a (/) w Z LLJ W o W U Q o�oGv h eehh O m o C C4 o N 0 �o 0 v o2m.. nocm n .2- o W � C t gg0 rn omO1 O a n - ~ u o -°• m �ma� c v9 w u u �Euo 3 cJw J o > o 0 0 aoC, Y o oEE� c E 2 Al g� .Q o �a mm g g c � uCI -ion$ m SHEET NUMBER REV. C.4.01 B MFRA FILE I ISDN —1.5- BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE, MN/007 2350 TYPE MV 25 BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE, MN/DOT 2350 TYPE MV A B' CLA55 S -MOONS CRUSIIED OUARRT ROCK YN/b0T JI]B• SELECT GRANULAR MATEI M, MM/DOT 3149.28• (I' REWIRED BY SOILS ENGINEER) \CEOFABRICJ MND07 TYPE V, MRAFI 50OX IF RECWi£D APPROVED SUBGRADE HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT NOTM- TRUCK PARKING/DRIY6 1. THE PAVEMENT SECTIONS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED M ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT - STANDARD SPEC/IGDON FOR CONSTRUCTION', AND ALSO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OWNER'S SOR EN=UfL • RIDER TO MN/DOT SPED MATIONS 2 ALL THICKNESSES, AS SPECIFIED. ARE TO BE CONSIDERED MINIMUM DEPTHS AFTER COMPACTION. 3. MN/DOT SPEC. 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT SHALL BE PLACED BETWEEN SUCCESSIVE BITUMINOUS LIFTS AND AGAINST ABUTTING CONCRETE CURB EDGES 4 2331, TYPE 42, BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE MATERIAL WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. PAVEMENT SECTIONS NO SCALE REV 07/05 ~ zr I f 8612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER (TYP.) JAB III THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY GUAM LEVEL C. THIS GUAM LEVEL WAS DETERMINED EXISTING PARKING RAMP F4TaPERn LONE SUS ACCORDING UTILITY D THE OF CONTRACTOR AND/OR AND/OR SUBCON�TR�ACTOR5 4WLLDETEERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION ALLLL E OSTiNC UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WDRK BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER S7ATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND /ON SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD) 7 IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE SITE, HE OR SHE SHALL U07IFY THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION, SIM INVERT AND j IF THE 11LE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO ACTIVE DRAM TILE SHALL BE BACOBLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER. 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET N II— w C-) F= W (n a _z L3J EL M N a (/) w Z LLJ W o W U Q o�oGv h eehh O m o C C4 o N 0 �o 0 v o2m.. nocm n .2- o W � C t gg0 rn omO1 O a n - ~ u o -°• m �ma� c v9 w u u �Euo 3 cJw J o > o 0 0 aoC, Y o oEE� c E 2 Al g� .Q o �a mm g g c � uCI -ion$ m SHEET NUMBER REV. C.4.01 B MFRA FILE I ISDN -IIII- w ` I 811, EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL OPERATION TIME SCHEDULE It 858.9 . \ L!'r!'�ICiY�L•ii1l .858.4 v 858' TOTAL DISTURBED =M' =MMMIriM' �}� �7�' =ifi�M'MWIWMWi .. Ind rB586 1 �I IPt/IP2 �' /_ �` �BSB: a \_ / •857.5 IPl/IP� »� >' yr i.�. . aM2 •1� FiHw1ti� .857.7 !, •' .8583 ha ,r., -�..-- _ . 859.3 c l a 8580 x 858.1 " . 857.7 I I r 858.9 SF�-- -SF ---g -- --- --- -- -SF--- SF--- SF- - -SF -i - --SF-- -SF --- - - -- - - % H AP2 IPIJTP2 --S-_- . BSB.2 1 .\ ! \1 -- - - 856.4 _,ST- -- 1 - - - ' _ • � • 4.z � � •ail- --u5 -- t, Si . 12 SP CES / II ,.• - �� °°S °Jy�'pIP lll•'1� e r�IlllIIIIIV LI• 1 1 ICI AI. .� 13 SPACES 171 : I -d ■l �l 1 _ Imo ACREAGE SUMMARY in ACRES EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL OPERATION TIME SCHEDULE 1.7 AC+ pp `1� M 71 L!'r!'�ICiY�L•ii1l • a • MM' TOTAL DISTURBED =M' =MMMIriM' �}� �7�' =ifi�M'MWIWMWi I� M ' ■EN■E■■NEE■■NE■■■■ .aa1 •' ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ��1JJH ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ MEMEMENEEMENEEMENE MEMENEENEENNEEMENE ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ EM■.■E■NE■■NEE■.■E ACREAGE SUMMARY in ACRES PAVEMENT AREA 1.7 AC+ BUILDING AREA 2.1 Aft SEEDED AREA 0.4 AC3 TOTAL DISTURBED 4.2 AC3 SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION t I - I } : y \/ i I 1 u I '. I PHASE I: 61.5 i I1� 1I ,I - \�\•Q 4 3 ., I I 1 I I i I j �r + IBy 7 I 1. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION PRIOR TO ANY WORK BEING PERFORMED. J I 1 2 INSTALL STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES. 1 PREPARE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA. 4. CONSTRUCT THE SILT FENCES ON THE STE. 5. INSTALL FLOATING f\ 1 IL HALT ALL PERFORM AC �pryL� BNONTACT HE CIML ENGINEERING CONSULTANT TO i5 I IN M GENERAL AC SHALL SCHEDULE AND I I 1 � I ` Y 1 � I cl ' ' •yT �', // \ l / I ` V v� CONDUCT STORM WATER PRE - CONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH ENGINEER AND ALL D.4 iii!_ FA! �\ I GROUND DISTURBING CONTRACTORS BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. C: FEET 'r _ I 4 7. BEGIN DEMOLITION. PROVIDE INLET PROTECTION FOR ON SITE STORM AS REQUIRED. w - i� /; L• \ , _ _ �� \•Y P\•. \ L.. _ i �I ., 9. BEGIN GRADING THE SITE BUILDING PAD AND STRUCTURES / -- / . Tspy9 \ FALLS I I PHASE II: f T +� "/ • D.5 FE FiD�TH __ 1. TEMPORARILY SEED DENUDED AREAS I 1 Y ( L \♦ OF HE ! !1 •' 2 INSTALL UTIUTIES, UNDERDRAINS, STORM SEWERS, CURBS AND GUTTERS I' `� Y 4 . II •• I 3. INSTALL RIP RAP AROUND OUTLET STRUCTURES \ V .T v p4 > • f <4- INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AROUND ALL STORM SEWER STRUCTURES. ' N1 5. PREPARE SITE FOR PAMNC. 1 y I I q 6 PAVE SITE. i 7. . INSTALL INLET PROTECTION DEVICES. COMPLETE GRADING AND INSTALL PERMANENT SEEDING AND PLANTING. �., , 855.2 (B= 7 I 9. SE EOM �A uMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DENCES ONLY IF BI ZED), IF REQIRED BY THE CONTRACT n cn 15 " FE`T REFER TO SHEET C.6.03 FOR GENERAL NOTES, •J -- _ `=.:TrH G. T,tE LIKE 1/ / / f Q �° 6 2 - - "= d / �' MAINTENANCE NOTES AND LOCATION MAPS REFER TO SHEET C.6.04 FOR DETAILS i1T " ' I I •--- Bss�s r r ' \ - ids as l=- es- --.�- �,s�5 --'gaz �-- .� - 1 8566 �. �" 1 r / r 848 •` 852.8 850 • / ✓ ll 1 / LEGEND PROPERTY LIMIT EXISTING CONTOURS ------------932------- K $ �� EXISTING STORM SEWER \ PROPOSED CONTOUR 932 I I I ! �� ` - +' I• PROPOSED STORM SEWER - «-- -«- SILT FENCE/ ---g---g---g«--SF---SF---SF- 1 I I -� Ii I h1e51.6 a' �c'�•��� 1 -erg/_ �� LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE \ / \. / Ge.� TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH _.- SPACES 51.5 1 I . I I ��\ n\ SI F SOIL BORINGS ST -9 PA -10 OATiNG LT ENCE VOp ` 1 SHALL BE INSTALLED IF - CES /850. v nn`1 `\ I DEEM SID NECESSARY BY ' I 1 `2 z . 853.51 SPp I / I \\ /' DS\ v ,Hg C�T I OF EDINA J , 9 _ / p \ / ` of TEMPORARY STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE &55.7 . e5. PERMANENT STABILIZATION I r " ` n \ DIRECTION OF OVERLAND FLOW �> 1 850.6! I \ GRAVEL k WIRE MESH INLET SEDIMENT FILTER IP7 SPACES ya F -- A�ES IP1 m \ H. 48.04 INLET PROTECTION ® IP2 853.7 SP STORMWATER OUTFLOW TO CENTENNIAL LAKE e SEDIMENT CONTROL BARRIERS C.6.04 DRAINAGE AREA = 4.19 ACRES TEMPORARY STORAGE AND PARKING AREA TSP D FLOATING SILT FENCE I 61.51 I r, I I ,BSS9 IvIBem _.._' } 6'ye o4 +, ,• I c6.w TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASIN TSB I I J `8� S TM NSF (ISTING PARKI4 AMP ACE UIILLIY WFORMAL SHOWN ON THESE PINS &:X TY QUALITY LEVEL C THIS GuAuTY LEVEL YA5 DETERMINED A IO TO THE (L niNEs OF CIASQ 38-o2. TnLED - ARD GUIDELINES FOR THE C710N AND DEPICTION Of FAIZ URUTY DATA• TIE GONTRA07aR AID � D 30 60 I II O 4 BS@ OOLLE /OR SUBOON7RACLORS sHAU DETFAIORE THE DUCT LOCATION a ALL /�• - PLL 7f� UTILITIES BEFORE COY WORK BY CONTACI•NG THE 1DN IIIHTFR (GOPHER STA1E ONE FOR WINESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/ON sUBCDWTRAC70R AGREE TO BE FULLY TEMPORARY STABILIZATION MEASURES FOR ANY AND ALL iA11AGES. IIIHCH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL MUM (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD)L C.6.a (SEED, MULCH, MATS OR BLANKETS AS TSM 1 1 1e56 1 -BSe (/ 9y5T IF 11E, TOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE SITE. HE OR WE SHIN! NOTIFY THE ENGINEER WTH THE LOCATION. SIZE mvm AND IF THE TILE LIE IS ACmv- NO ACTIVE OUTLINED IN THE SWPPP) SCALE IN FEET U 1 - I: .RAIN_ SHALL BE BACKFIUED MTHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROEM EJIG1NEER. r•. oA tom - U: n... - muI .wr Z J o_ O Z • Z W ZN (n z L_ m N oa �QW'w Z _ ca '•3 N O w C y ooh'. 11 1 C 'K m . C Sit` O N o C C �4 •1T � � u IS IS o V Q m N VI C ° m i t ma o c m o nmco K rn° W � C 3 m C o noo ommm a n �« u o .°• m SEuo u' -CJ � oEEa °c E La� i VU Z O C? 0 3 mm c Y y11 � o a' id i m SHEET NQ®EII REV. C.6.01 B MFRA FILE / 15308 \ +Li w' 1pi 1!2 '1 I \ I \\ 1 I I I ' II I� in:. V :. �.. a 0. u4m I rI j ETA- IL 20,000 -CSF \ 15K SF. BASE i5K S.F. -MEzm FFE =86E 1 TOP -FLOOR n f I IP7 .\I( ■ ■ ■ ■ ■�m70■ ■ ■■ 1 0 _ ' \\ `- La - d II ( I c0 d 0': R! 14 STORY ON TOP OF - SF-- _SF--- 5F - - -y -Y . - 5•n,_ - -» it ��, -F54-- i 1 ! IP7 /I I SOIL EROSION/SEDIMENTATION • • OPERATION TIME SCHEDULE 1 !1 1' 1.' !7 7' •1 1' 1 t1� :I li' M�.�f ' • / M 71 • - . • a • �Y•IIrY 2.1 AC3 SEEDED AREA 0 ®���iWW TOTAL DISTURBED 4 4.2 AC3 ,�IiYYY��I�� .�.'. ®Y116.1® ���� TEMPORARY ' • •''I ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ DEVELOPER /OWNER: CYPRESS EOUITIES 15601 DALLAS PARKWAY, SUITE 400 ADDISON. TEXAS 75001 (972) 361 -5033 CONTACT: BRETT WITZIG ACREAGE SUMMARY In ACRES PAVEMENT AREA 1 1.7 AC* BUILDING AREA 2 2.1 AC3 SEEDED AREA 0 0.4 ACt TOTAL DISTURBED 4 4.2 AC3 PARKING PODIUM (3 LEVELS ABOVE GRADE, F �`S BELDW) - SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION I �" FFE =855 5 II s 8T* -�� I I ! n a n I PHASE E [PI V 1. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION PRIOR TO ANY WORK BEING PERFORMED. IP7 2 INSTALL STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES -�' i ! _( 1 f I f I _ -1 _ :i! I__ _ j 1 �', ••. 3. PREPARE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA / - 4. CONSTRUCT THE SILT FENCES ON THE SITE. �RETA -L_�I E - /' - 5 INSTALL FLOATING SILT FENCE AS NECESSARY 70 PROTECT LAKE J . \ 1. 6. HALT ALL ACTIVITIES AND CONTACT THE CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT TO / Iu \ ` �°+• ° \i;`` ` PERFORM INSPECTION OF BMPS GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE AND I i 5.440 CSi j ' V i '` \ �' w N t ` t'J! CONDUCT STORM WATER PRE - CONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH ENGINEER AND ALL F TOP8�,p_..: �' _ �'\ 1 1 j �('� GROUND DISTURBING CONTRACTORS BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. pQR 7. BEGM OEYOLITION. PROVIDE INLET PROTECTION FOR ON SITE STORM AS REQUIRED. 9. START GRADING NSTE. BUILDING PAD AND STRUCTURES. �-� RESTAURANT PHASE II: / t 7K D 7K GSF DO i YjN I °t . 1. TEMPORARILY SEED DENUDED AREAS. 2 INSTALL UTILITIES. UNDERDRAINS, STORM SEWERS. CURBS AND GUTTERS FFE =853.0 L/l I •, 3. NSTALL RIP RAP AROUND OUTLET STRUCTURES €[ / RESTAURANT 4. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AROUND ALL STORM SEWER STRUCTURES PARE SITE FOR PANNG. /' 6. PAVE SITE. _ 6K GSF ONE STORY If 7. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION DENCES ,/ s I( S COMPLETE GRADING AND INSTALL PERMANENT SEEDING AND PLANTING. r' // ���• ,`aq- ,/ FFE =853.0 I I (L ;7 9. REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DENCES (ONLY IF SITE IS STABILIZED). IF REO11RE0 BY THE CONTRACT REFER TO SHEET C.6.03 FOR GENERAL NOTES, _ N LOCATION MAPS RETAIL 3 - - - /'! * REFER TO SHEET C.6.04 FOR DETAILS = i - � � � �`�s'. _ / '' ,FFE =8680 1 ' e5- _is___ -_ ;. I TOP FLOOR- - LEGEND rj PROPERTY LIMIT _ EXISTING CONTOURS -------------°33-------- --� EXISTING STORM SEWER PROPOSED CONTOUR 932 PROPOSED STORM SEWER - « <�G- r SILT FENCE ------g---g---g---g---g- 1 ` q�l. PROPOSED RETAINING WALL \IN III IN III ml III IN III (�` /�� . � FLOATING SILT FENCE TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH W G\ oOO SHALL BE INSTALLED IF. -_ I I' / I.I ; A•. ''-� R ` 1• DEEMED NECESSARY BY SOIL BORINGS ST -9 PA -10 - RE Al L4 i - 1 \ \\ ,, ��EP THE CITY OF EDINA 14K cSF B kSE + j F TEMPORARY STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 3K GSF ME NINE FFE =B 8.0 i-n TOP R R: � (' ,,4 84 PERMANENT STABILIZATION 9 1...: ` "� -' I 1 / !� '1•:' DIRECTION OF OVERLAND FLOW �> GRAVEL & WIRE MESH INLET SEDIMENT FILTER ® IP1 ; STORMWATER OUTFLOW eINLET PROTECTION ®IP2 0y°- YIPI - " ^ TO CENTENNIAL LAKE �6.a _IPl �m DRAINAGE AREA = 4.19 ACRES SEDIMENT CONTROL BARRIERS • F 0 TI G SI T iE TEMPORARY STORAGE AND PARKING AREA TSP TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASIN TSB r '' ' ; •FJ(I$TIIJG PARKINGaAMP J ' 7Ht 91B511R(AOE 11l7fY WFQRIiAhol SHOWN 01! 1/1ESC` PIANglS A VIIIj7Y it LEVEL G THIS 011ALITf IEVTL WAS DEIERI@&D ACCOROGC TOjTHE GUmR➢NES O OASQ 38 02 TITLED STANDARD GIADELNES f011 THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EMSTING e TEMPORARY STABILIZATION MEASURES SUBSURFME'UT6J,7 oAU' 11FFJ�E �OTiR1�Ci0R7UA/QR' SlIB50111RACI0119 9fA(,L, Tiff ETfACT louTKNN a Au E>asTTNC UTTUT¢S BE1Off I�w1ENf9NG WDRK. BY cONTACI•F nff NoT9TCATION IIlTfF7i (caP11DT STATE aNE Fa MTNKESO7A). THE c6.a (SEED, MULCH, MATS OR BLANKETS AS SM r I- L01(1RACTOtYND/OR S1J�CONIRA/;T01 AiREE 7D BE Nl1Y. RESPU119D1F'F•R _- AND ALL DAYAlLS, WH101 YK7IT BE OCUSONED DY IRS OR NER [ALUIff TD EIUCTIY LOG7E AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL URliffS (IRIDERGROMD AND OVEN$AD} OUTLINED IN THE SWPPP) " f. Rff C01{iRAC7DR [NCOM1[RS. AtY 01,ADF•7L� .YlI10(/ 71E:5(1E, EW: dE qE NoTIIY TIff ENdNEER MiM Tiff LOCATKW, SME, 61VEA7 AND 6 VXE llE UlA IS ACTIVE. NO AGAVE DRA6N 76E SHALL BE BAOORIID M7HOIT APM,WAL EROM llff PRO.ECI ENGINEER I c - 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET a J [1 O Lu z /�/ O c U= V J Z_ 1'•J W Q � N Od .'e W N W z } Z O U N O Er W Q ^hN �Mbh 1. N n h e eVn� ehry C 'K C `y=am O to LL C �4 m Q o� 2 m j U 0 0 r °ems C °co °tea: COW C CGS O o v 0 C `« uo� m Y °aN c vo o c o Y � U ° � o mEEa c° E ZI o m La i 1A o a` o a 8 Cl m 8 8 X�d OC d SHEET NUMBER REV. C.6.02 B MFRA ME • Isms 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET a J [1 O Lu z /�/ O c U= V J Z_ 1'•J W Q � N Od .'e W N W z } Z O U N O Er W Q ^hN �Mbh 1. N n h e eVn� ehry C 'K C `y=am O to LL C �4 m Q o� 2 m j U 0 0 r °ems C °co °tea: COW C CGS O o v 0 C `« uo� m Y °aN c vo o c o Y � U ° � o mEEa c° E ZI o m La i 1A o a` o a 8 Cl m 8 8 X�d OC d SHEET NUMBER REV. C.6.02 B MFRA ME • Isms MAINTENANCE: ALL MEASURES STATED ON THIS EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL RAN, AND IN THE STOW WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN FULLY FUNCTIONAL OONDIDON UNTIL NO LONGER REWIRED FOR A COMPLETED PHASE OF WOE( OR FOUL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE THE DESIGNATED CONTACT PERSON NOTED ON THIS PLAN MUST ROUTINELY INSPECT THE CONSTRUCTION ON SITE ONCE EVERY SEVEN DAYS WRING ACTIVE CONTRUCTIW IN AND WITH 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN 05 INCHES IN 24 HOURS ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CLEANED AND REPAIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING 1. ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS MADE OPERABLE WRING CONSTRUCTION MUST BE PROTECTED BY APPROPRIATE BMP'S UNTIL ALL SOURCES WITH POTENTIAL FOR DISCHARGING TO THE INLET HAVE BEEN STABILIZED. 2. ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE CHECKED REGULARLY TO SEE THAT A GOOD STAND IS MAINTAINED. AREAS SHOULD BE FERWZED, WATERED. AND RESEEDED AS NEEDED. 3. SILT FENCES SHALL BE REPAIRED. REPLACED OR SUPPLEMENTED TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITIONS IF DAMAGED. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SILT FENCES WHEN IT REACHES ONE -THIRD THE HEIGHT OF THE SILT FENCE. THESE REPAIRS MUST BE MADE WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DISCOVERY. OR AS SOON AS FIELD CONDI TIONS ALLOW ACRES 4. VEHICLE TRACKING OF SEDIMENT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE MUST BE MINIMIZED BY OMPS SU04 AS STONE PADS CONCRETE OR STEEL WASH RACKS OR EQUIVALENT SYSTEMS STREET SWEEPING MUST BE USED IF SUCH BMP'S ARE NOT ADEQUATE TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM BEING TRACKED ONTO THE STREET. TRACKED SEDIMENT MUST BE REMOVED FROM ALL OFF -SITE PAVED SURFACES WITHIN 24 HOURS DE DISCOVERY OR SOONER. 5. THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA SHALL BE KEPT IN GOOD CONDITION (SUITABLE FOR PARKING AND STORAGE} THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING GE THE TEMPORARY PARKING AS CONDITIONS DEMAND. 6. OUTLET STRUCTURES IN THE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASINS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS AT ALL TIMES SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM SEDIMENT BASINS OR TRAPS WHEN THE DESIGN CAPACITY REACHES ONE -HALF THE STORAGE VOLUME DRAINAGE 8 REMOVAL MUST BE COMPLETED WITIHN 72 HOURS OF DISCOVERY OR AS SOON AS FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOW ACCESS, SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION 1. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION PRIOR TO ANY WORK BEING PERFORMED. 2. INSTALL STABw2ED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES 3. PREPARE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA 4. CONSTRUCT THE SILT FENCES ON THE SITE 5. INSTALL FLOATING SILT FENCE AS NECESSARY TO PROTECT LAKE 6. HALT ALL ACTIVITIES AND CONTACT THE CIVIL ENGNEERMC CONSULTANT TO PERFORM INSPECTION OF IMP. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE AND CONDUCT STORM WATER PRE - CONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH ENGINEER ANO ALL GROUND DISTURBING CONTRACTORS BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTOR. 7. BEGIN DEMOLITION. PROVIDE INLET PROTECTION FOR ON SITE STORM AS REWIRED. B. START CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDING PAD AND STRUCTURES 9. BEGIN GRADING THE SITE. PHASE II: 1, TEMPORARILY GEED DENUDED AREAS 2. INSTALL UTILITIES UNDERDRAINS, STORM SEWERS, CURBS AND GUTTERS 3. INSTALL RIP RAP AROUND OUTLET STRUCTURES 4. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AROUND ALL STORM SEVER STRUCTURES. 5. PREPARE SITE FOR PAVING. 6. PAVE SITE 7. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION DEVICES 8. COMPLETE GRADING AND INSTALL PERMANENT SEEDING AND PLANTING 9. REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES (ONLY IF SITE IS STABILIZED), IF REWIRED BY THE CONTRACT CYPRESS EOUITIES 15601 DALLAS PARKWAY, SUITE 400 ADDISON, TEXAS 75001 (972) 361 -5033 CONTACT: BRETT WITZIG • �u � L I �L �L 1' • L • 1 �� : '; I FI tiT3i' s.Hded.l. r p��P "\ �\ sA zz" 117 U1 IJ TOh SH W DYII >ae E ^ And.. a 7 7n SY r. W7fat St v n!ed Pib zeitvn I Nedra A L q- I n w d:s1 2n sN W71112 St A A m c U � NilIP f. G!rtl D1 ° ^�tl.11 Ur u t..a k z r �� h ! W7 71 Nn i £d � Obi 17 .. D S-1. -F tl - 6hSt av 17 77Th $1W `. °•U� 200 in t no.TOODn \` Iainnesot.w nepN11 O20D5 v.! Ine ACREAGE SUMMARY in ACRES PAVEMENT AREA 1.7 AC3 BUILDING AREA 2.1 AC3 SEEDED AREA 0.4 AC3 TOTAL DISTURBED 4.2 AC3 *_. Li D t r 1 r r z . ,may r r } ffII w v f 4 yrE ry' < %T "-°a .- f". r��i;✓'./j33/'1,�. _T__t _,° �f F Lr P T OEE LAN r €.` �2 I Ike IRA, � }+3 Y f tj f , 411w SOIL EROSION /SEDIMENTATION CONTROL OPERATION TIME SCHEDULE NOTE: CONTRACTOR OR GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE TABLE WITH THEIR SPECIFIC PROJECT SCHEDULE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN TEMPORARY CONTROL MEASURES STRIP & STOCKPILE TOPSOIL ROUGH GRADE / SEDIMENT CONTROL TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ROADS FOUNDATION / BUILDING CONSTRUCTION SITE CONSTRUCTION PERMANENT CONTROL STRUCTURES FINISH GRADING LANDSCAPING /SEED /FINAL STABILIZATION STORM FACILITIES GENERAL EROSION NOTES: 1. CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPUCABLE GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO SAME 'WHERE A CONFLICT EXISTS BETWEEN LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND MFRA SFANDARD SPECDICATIONS TIRE MORE STRINGENT SPECIFICATION SHALL APPLY. 2. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATIONS AND /OR ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PUNS ARE BASED ON RECORDS O THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND, wMam: POSE MEASUREMENTS TAIHFN IN TN .TIE SUBSIIRFA Off YA WN A IY TY BCE. E FELD GE UTDITY as TION SXO tN THESE PLANS S UIUTY QUAU EEVLL G THIS WALL LEVEL WAS DETEIBIINED AOODItDINC 70 THE GHMEDNES ai Cl/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED - STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA' THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BONG EXACT OR COMPLETE THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT ALL THE APPROPRIATE UTUTY COMPARES AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS THE LOCATIONS OF SMALL UTILITIES SHALL BE OBTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR BY CALLING MINNESOTA GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 800- 252 -1166 OR 651 - 454 -0002 1 THE DESIGN SHOWN IS BASED UPON THE ENGINEER'S UNDERSTANDING OF THE EXISTING CONDITIONS THE EXISTING CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE BASED UPON AN ALTA OR TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PREPARED BY INFRA DATED 7 -12 -2005 IF CONTRACTOR N DOES NOT ACCEPT EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS WITHOUT EXCEPTION THEY SHALL HAVE AT THEIR EXPEN A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY 8Y A REGISTERED MADE, SE G6TFRE NAND SURVEYOR AND SUBMIT IT TO THE OWNER FOR REVIEW. SI]: ATTACHED SURVEY 9HEE'IS 4. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE M ADJACENT RRONERIIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT- THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES OCCURRING TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES WRING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. 5. THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN SWPPP IS OF WIN SEDIMENTATION CONTROL - PLAN STANDARD THE N NARRATIVE, TT COMPRISED ER THIS DRAWING EROSION P RTS AN OL PUN ESC .111E 5 ARD DETAILS E PU TIE A AtlHMDN75 INCLDDED IN THE SIIEWORN SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 02]70 (SWPPP). PLUS THE PERMIT FUND ALL SUBSEQUENT REPORTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS. 6 THE CONTRACTOR SMALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLETING A SUBMITTING THE APPLICATION FOR THE MPCA GENERAL STODNWATER POUT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION SHALL ANA A OBTAIN CONY Qi THE SWPPP AND THE STATE R MINNESOTA NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM GENERAL PERMIT PFR NPDES ( M T) AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THEIR CONTENTS. THE SMPPP AND ALL OFFER FII1J1Tm DOQAE1115 MDSE BE KEPT AT flE 41E gRiY1C COIISIRtICOON 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRAT Y GE PRACTICES IMP'S AS REQUIRED B THE SNPPP Q PEIRMIIS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OVERSEE THE INSPECTION d MAINTENANCE a ME IMP'S AND EROSION TI ( ) PREVENTION FROM BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION AND UNTIL CONSTRUCTION 6 COMPLETED. 5 APPROVED BY ALL AUTHORITIES 71E NOTICE O TERMINATION (NOT) HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE MPG BY TIMER THE OWNER ON OPERATOR AS APPROVED ON PERMIT. ADDITIONAL IMPS SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AS DICTATED BY CONDITIONS AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER THROUGHOUT ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. B. BMP'S AND CONTROLS SHALL CONFORM TO FEDERAL. STATE OR LOCAL REQUIREMENTS OR MANUAL O PRACTICE AS APPUCABLL CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT ADDITIONAL CONTROLS AS DIRECTED BY PERMITTING AGENCY OR OWNER. 9. ESC PUN MUST CLEARLY DLLUNEATE ALL STATE WATERS PERMITS FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IMPACTING STATE WATERS OR REGULATED WETLANDS MUST BE MAINTAINED ON SITE AT ALL TIMES 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL MI LL MI ZE CLEARING TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICAL OR AS REQUIRED BY THE GENERAL PERMIT. THE BOUNDARIES OF 1X INCA L1MI74 SHOWN THIS Y QUI E AFAR ON S PLAN SHALL BE CLEARLY DELINEATED (E.G. MIX WIGS. STAKES. SONS SILT FFTlGE. ETC) ON THE DEVELOPMENT SITE BEFORE MARK BEGINS 11. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL DENOTE ON MN THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA WHICH SHALL ALSO SE USED AS THE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND CLEANING AREA EMPLOYEE PARKING AREA, AND AREA FOR LOCATING PORTABLE FACIUTES, OFFICE TRAILERS AND TOILET FAOUTES 12. ALL WSWATE(CONCRETE TRUCKS. VFlIC CLEANING, EW IP MENT CLEANING. ETC-) MUST SE LIMITED TO A DEFINED AREA O THE SITE AND SHALL BE CONTAINED AND PROPERLY TREATED OR DISPOSED. NO ENGINE DECREASING IS ALLOWED ON SITE 13. SUFFICIENT CL AND GREASE ABSORBING MATERIALS AND ROTATION BOOMS SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON 97E OR READY AVAILABLE TO CONTAIN AND CLEAN -UP FUEL OR CHEMICAL SPILLS AND LEAKS 14. OUST ON THE SITE SHALL BE CONTROLLED. THE USE OF MOTOR OILS AND OTHER PETROLEUM BASED OR TOXIC LIQUIDS FOR DUST SUPPFESSON OPERATIONS IS PROHIBITED. 15. SCUD WASTE COLLECTED SEDIMENT, ASPHALT k CONCRETE MILUNGS FLOATING DEBRIS, PAPER, PLASTIC, FABRIC. CONSTRUCTION d DEMOLITION DEBRIS & OTHER WASTES MUST BE DISPOSED O PROPERLY d MUST COMPLY WITH MPG DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS 16. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS OIL. GASOLINE. PANT O ANY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES MUST BE PROPERLY STORED, INCLUDING SECONDARY CONTAINMENT, TO PREVENT SPILLS, LEANS OR OTHER DISCHARGE RESTRICTED ACCESS TO STORAGE AREAS MUST BE PROVIDED TO PREVENT VANDALISM. STODGE ✓k DEPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MUST BE IN COMPUALE MTN MPG REGULATIONS 17. ALL STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION MEASURES PRESENTED ON THIS PLAN, AND IN THE SWPPP, SHALL BE INITIATED AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE AND PRIOR TD ANY STEUORK. 18, DI STURBED PORTIONS OF THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS STOPPED SHALL BE TEMPORARILY SEEDED. SEEDING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN/DOT SPEC, 2575 O IOOLRS /ACRE (OR APPROVED EQUAL) AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING GUIDELINES TYPE OFSOPE IKE (MAX TIME AN AREA CAN REMAIN OPEN WHEN THE AREA IS NOT ACTIVELY BEING WORKED) STEEPER THAN 3:1 7 DAYS 10-1 TO 3:1 14 DAYS RATTER MAN 10:1 21 DAYS 19. DISTURBED PORTIONS O THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS PERMANENTLY STOPPED SHALL BE PERMANENTLY SEEDED. THESE AREAS SHALL RE SEEDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TIME TABLE DESCRIBED ABOVE SITELOCATION MAP USGS MAP REFER TO THE GRADING PLAN AND /OR LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR VEGETATIVE COVER NOT TO SCALE 20. CONTRAC7ORS OR SUBCONTRACTORS WELL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING SEDIMENT FROM CONVEYANCES 8 FROM TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS THAT ARE TO BE USED AS PERMANENT WATER OUAUTY MANA EMENT N07 TO SCALE BASINS SEDIMENT MUST BE STABILIZED TO PREVENT IT FROM BEING WASHED BACK INTO THE BASIN, CONVEYANCES. OR DRAINAGEWAYS DISCHARGING OFF -SITE OR TO SURFACE WATERS THE CIEANWT O PERMANENT BASINS UUST BE SUFFICIENT TO RETURN THE BASIN TO DESIGN CAPACITY. 21. ON-SITE d OF -SITE SOIL STOOU"LE AND BORROW AREAS SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION THROUGH IMPLEMENTATION OF BMP'S STOLID'ILE AND BORROW AREA LOCATIONS SHALL BE NOTED ON THE SITE MAP AND PERMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERAL PERMIT REQUIREMENTS 22- TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES MUST HAVE SILT FENCE OR OTHER EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS A CANNOT BE PLACED IN SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING STORMWATER CONVEYANCES SUCH AS CURB & CUTTER SYSTEMS OR CONDUITS A DITCHES 23. SLOPES SHALL BE LEFT IN A ROUGHENED CONDITION DURING THE GRADING PHASE TO REDUCE RUNOFF VELOCITIES AND EROSION. 24. DUE TO ME GRADE CHANGES WRING THE DEVELOPMENT O THE PROJECT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADJUSTING THE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES (SILT FENCES CHECK DAMS INLET PROTECTION DEVICES, ETC-) TO PREVENT EROSION. 25, ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE STABILIZED AT THE END O EACH WORKING DAY, THIS INCLUDES BACKFIL NG OF TRENCHES FOR UTILITY CONSTRUCTION AND PLACEMENT OF GRAVEL OR BITUMINOUS PAVING FOR ROAD CONSTRUCTION, Z J CL LuJ 0 F ow N 0f I- Z N Z LJJ w¢ Q N OW Z LLu Vlw Lu °w -klo I- N CE EC w h >t ^ r C E � b h eeh>�j th SC�n AC 'K p k N I. �E .0 0 Q3 E� L rt� in' ut a a � 0 n 0 Y i i o u o m O v D O D U Q c o~ ° c m a isow c e, c 31 s ao0 _m o o'mp n. °� m rE'a`R^ c $Ec� v p O � npo 3 mEr c° E q� F 0 a 3 13 I� m g o $ �> o d IY e SHEET NUMBER REV. C.6.03 A INFRA FIE / 153D6 OVERLAP OEOIEST ILE ! F7. MIN. LE/GTN POSE 6 FT. MIN. LENGTH P057 FABRIC . IN. FASTEN AT B FT. MAX. SPACIND AT 6 FT. MAX. SPACING A7 2 FT. INTERN MIRE IE6N REINFORCEMENT STAPLES _ GEOTEXi1LE FABRIC. 48" WIDE GEff"XTILE FABRIC. 36" WIDE FABRIC ANCICUGE FABRIC ANCHORAGE iRDCI. RAIKF LL " TRENCH. BACFILL DIWDTIBI fF WITH iRIPED Y1TH RAMPED xIITRXUt BOIL DIRECTIOII OF RHM6F PLOW WITH TA PIED i m : e i EX7E1D r11E 4' m 6" B MIN. mF MIN. HEAVY DUTY PREASSEMBLED PLASTIC ZIP TIES ►OB7 LEMOM B FT. MIN. 1 H10 LB. TENSILE 1 AT G Fl. MAX. SPACDO LOCATED IN TOP B' OIWEcT FLOW CEOTEXTL E FABRIC. 76' WIDTH wRCHIIE SLiCf I�I� i.� B 72 ' RPfX 1 PLUS 6" FLM / STANDARD MACHINE SLICED DESIGN GUIDELINES. SILT FENCE DETAILS MAXIN M CONTRIBUTING AREM 7 ACRES TO PROTECT AREAS FROM BEET FLOW 1 SEE SPEC. 3M 1 SILT FENCE SEE MNDOT SPEC. 3m N.T.S. OH OR SEDIMENT FILTER MATERIAL ACCESS TO COVER 'ECTION WATER INLET WIRE PLAN TEMPORARY STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE N.T.S. 10/01/04 6 TYPICAL DETAIL - UPDATE 10 MATCH SITE CONFIGURATION WIRE SCREEN BLOCKS CONCRETE BLOCKS O RUNOFF �.s .r FRTCREO � WA N INLET SEDIMENT FlL1ER SECTION 1.PLACE CONCRETE BLOCKS IN A SINGLE ROW AROUND PERIMETER OF NUT ON THEW SIDES, WITH ENDS OF ADJACENT BLOCKS ABUTTING 2.HDG7 OF BARRIER VARIES USE STACKS OF {-INCH, 9-MICH. OR 12' BLOCKS ION. HEIGHT OF BARRIER 12' AND MAX. HEIGHT OF 24' 3PLACE HARDWARE CLOTH /WINE MESH W/ MAX 1/2' OPENINGS OVER VERTICAL FAKE OF CONCRETE BLOCKS 4.71E SEDIMENT FILTER SHALL BE ANY NON- EROVINE MATERIAL SUCH AS LOOSE ROCK, BROKEN CONCRETE THAT WELL SLOW THE ROW OF THE WATER AND ALLOW R TO FILTER THROUGH ARID OVER THE MATERIAL BEFORE ENIEAWNG THE INLET. BLOCK AND AGGREGATE INLET SEDIMENT FILTER N.TS TYPICAL DETAIL - UPDATE TO MATCH SITE CONFIGURATION MIN, 05% GRADE DO M FROM PUBUC STREET 12 II:': ►+`_ 1. PREPARE SOIL BEFORE INSTALLING BLANKETS, INCLUDING ANY NECESSARY APPLICATION OF S 1� UME• FERTBRZER AND SEED. SPECIFIC APPLICATION OlP,) 2. BEGN AT THE TO OF THE SLOPE BY ANCHORING THE BLANKET IN A 6' DEEP X 6' WIDE THIS METHOD OF INLET PROTECTION IS APPL1CABlE AT CURB INLETS YMERE T A 1TOm IRATE IF TIA]I ExtFS TRENCH WITH APPRODIMATELY 12' OF BLANKET EXTENDED BEYOND THE UP -SLOPE PORTION PONDING IN FRWNT (! THE SIRULTURE IS N07 UKR7 TO CAUSE 1 • .T taerma O THE TRENCH ANCHOR THE BLANKET WITH A ROW OF STAPLES/STAKES APPROXIMATELY INCONVENIENCE OR DAMAGE TO ADJACENT STRUCTURES AND UNPROTECTED 1' . 2' STAxE 12' APART IN THE BOTTOM O THE TRENCH. BA/70D1 AND COMPACT 11E TRENCH AFTER AREAS. a STAPUNG APPLY SEED TO COMPACTED SOIL AND FOLD REMAINING 12' PORTION OF BLANKET • GRAVEL SHALL BE 2' -3' CLEAN STONE \ _ BACK OVER SEED AND COMPACTED SOIL SECURE BLANKET OVER COMPACTED SOIL WITH A ROW OF STARES/STAKES SPACED APPROXIMATELY 12' APART ACROSS THE 'WIDTH OF THE CURB INLET J = BLANKET. • GRAVEL SNAIL BE Y -J' CLEAN STONE AT�EI 1 ROLL THE BLANKETS (A) DOWN OR (B.) HORIZONTALLY ACROSS THE SLOPE BLANKETS WILL RUNOFF WATER 18' MIN ' X Ire FAQ UNROLL WITH APPROPRIATE SIDE AGAINST THE SOIL SURFACE ALL BLANKETS MUST BE WITH SEDIMENT AVEL: (12' MIN. DEPTH) / / FASTENED PER 70 SOL STAPLES/STAKES W APPROPRIATE 4. THE EDGES O PARALLEL BLANKETS MUST BE STAPLED WITH APNMENT. TELY 4' -6' OVERLAP SEDIMENT DEPENDING ON BLANKET 719E TO ENSURE PROPER SEAM ALKNMENT, PUCE THE EDGE OF THE OVERLAPPING BLANKET (BLANKET BEING INSTALLED ON TOP) EVEN WITH THE SEAM STITCH ON THE PREVIOUSLY INSTALLED BLANKET. V •, FARING F.'TEMGB Y Mm. 5. CONSECUTIVE BLANKETS SPLICED DOWN THE SLOPE MUST BE PLACED ENO OVER END "I (SHINGLE STYLE) WITH AN APPROPRIATE 3'OVERLAP. STAPLE THROUGH OVERLAPPED AREA, APPRODYAIF.LY 12'APART ACROSS ENTIRE BLANKET WIDTH. "RE MESH W/ FILTER FABRIC S. LA TAR MM ES /STAKES PER MANUFACTURE RECOMMENDATION FOR THE APPROPRIATE SLOPE TREATED WATER NOTES: SPECIFIC APPLICATION 1. IN LOOSE S0IL CONDITIONS. THE USE OF STAPLE OR STAKE LENGTHS GREATER THAN 6' MAY THIS METHOD OF INLET PROTECTION IS APPLICABLE SILT FENCE INLET PROTECTION DEVICE IP2 BE NECESSARY TO PROPERLY SECURE THE BLANKETS. NHERE HEAVY CONCENTRATED FLOWS ARE EXPECTED, N.T.S. 12/17/04 5 2. FOLLOW EROSION CONTROL TECHNOLOGY COUNCIL SPECIFICATION FOR PRODUCT SELECTION BUT NOT WHERE PONOING AROUND THE STRUCTURE TYPICAL DETAIL - UPDATE TO MATCH 97E CONFIGURATION MIGHT CAUSE EXCESSIVE INCONVENIENCE OR DAMAGE TO ADJACENT STRUCTURES AND UNPROTECTED AREAS. RATE INLET TYPICAL DETAIL G EROSION CONTROL BLANKET N.T.S. 12/17/04 g GRAVEL AND WIRE MESH INLET SEDIMENT FILTER IP1 N.T.S. 10 /01 /04 4 TYPICAL DETAIL - UPDATE TO MATCH SITE CONFIGURATION Z a J a J O Z V a _o C) � U ♦�1 1 01-J V) Z W lily N Al M. �aWN °w of Z U N O Of W OI H N ;z y °ehh OI �'gnn 'K CeC h .0 ^ U wwa. c o o u o 0 O m s m O R7 t] V 0 o" memo ocm« npco rn noW °c m � _omP' a m o n � o e00N m «:69 m e p E = J E c o v m m � O c �.ao In vEE9`m E o _,C,_ o ? N Z a qG F v 6 g I� Pl m $ os KQ' id < SHEET NUMBER REV. C.6.04 A IERA, FILE / 15306 15K S.F. BASE 5K S.F. M - ZANI FFE =868. TOP- FLOOR- __ 6'- SANT, INV: 844. a'- TEF RETAIL 2_._ --' --" 5,240 GSF FFE =868 0 - -- - - --- TOP FLOOR V RETAIL 3" -- B,BSO .GSF.- - FFE =868.0 - --- TOP FLOOR - TO EX G TERMAIN MH 1 RIM: 455.00 PINY. 812.57 - INV: TER S 8' WATER S INN.L 2.6C7- ERVICE SERVICE SERVICE *NOTE: SANITARY SEWER PRIVATE FROM OUTLET OF FORCEMAIN TO AND INCLUDING LIFT STATION AND INDIVIDUAL SERVICES _ - - c- >_.- II_iF - >> rj u ITARY SE _ _ 1L It SRN -VALVE VAULT v l ROk856.10 I n C SHEET C.7.02 UFl STATION ,- y V RIM: 856.10 C p MV: 842.41 �p S B__ A6 SEE SHEE7 0.7.02 - IJa35 !C I \ r o p COI '#bO To\*Rl TO �- 14 STORY ON TOP OF PARKING PODIUM (3 LEVELS ABOVE GRADE. _...__...._.. ....._...2 LEVELS... BELOW)__ ._ ..._. -.... _ FFE =855.5 v \ e ® s e o m I a o t v r 141 ^ I I l y n RET -A L4 INV: 845.15 8" WATER SERVICE 15000 1 SF 12K GSF B SE t �! 1 ` 3K GSF ME ANIN FFE =8 iS.0 2 BIM: 651.50 INV: 843.40 -N TOP FL R 13843.50-S / n \_ *NOTE: SANITARY SEWER PRIVATE FROM OUTLET OF FORCEMAIN TO AND INCLUDING LIFT STATION AND INDIVIDUAL SERVICES _ - - c- >_.- II_iF - >> rj u ITARY SE _ _ 1L It SRN -VALVE VAULT v l ROk856.10 I n C SHEET C.7.02 UFl STATION ,- y V RIM: 856.10 C p MV: 842.41 �p S B__ A6 SEE SHEE7 0.7.02 - IJa35 !C I \ r o p COI '#bO To\*Rl TO �- 14 STORY ON TOP OF PARKING PODIUM (3 LEVELS ABOVE GRADE. _...__...._.. ....._...2 LEVELS... BELOW)__ ._ ..._. -.... _ FFE =855.5 v \ e ® s e o m I a o t v r 141 ^ I I l y n 6' SANITARY SER - INV: 845.15 8" WATER SERVICE RESTAURANT 7K GSF UP 7K GSF DOWN FFE =853.0 6' SANITARY SERVICE INV: 845.88 RETAIL 6 BELO TERRACE �! 1 ` 8' WATER SERVICE ±18.000 GSF 2 BIM: 651.50 INV: 843.40 -N \ S� 13843.50-S / n \_ k« SANITARY SERVICE ^ \ IN INV: 1. 1 RIM: 851.40 PROPOSED CLEANOUT B" WATER SERVICE TER V: 044.00 -N 'P • FOUND MONUMENT - >- 6' SANITARY SER / INV: 845.15 8" WATER SERVICE Lil RETAIL 6 BELO TERRACE �! 1 ` ±18.000 GSF FFE =853.0 EXISTING k« SANITARY SERVICE Lon 'fIil I °. IN INV: 1. 1 RIM: 851.40 PROPOSED B" WATER SERVICE TER V: 044.00 -N 'P • FOUND MONUMENT - >- I� RESTAURANT 6K GSF ONE STORY FFE =853.0 6' SANITARY SERVICE INV: 848.05 8' WATER SERVICE PR -- ON$TRUCTION ------- - - -... T- GIN �ppE 10O��P�F� UTILITY CONSTRUCTION NOTES A. THE UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 'STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATIONS' AS PUBLISHED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), EXCEPT AS MODIFIED HEREIN. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THESE SPECIFICATIONS. 1. ALL UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE TO CITY OF EDINA ENGINEERING GUIDELINES. 2006 EDITION. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPEN, TURN OFF, INTERFERE WITH, OR ATTACH ANY PIPE OR HOSE TO OR TAP WATERMAIN BELONGING TO THE CITY UNLESS DULY AUTHORIZED TO DO SO BY THE CITY. ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OF ANY SCHEDULED OR UNSCHEDULED DISRUPTIONS OF SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC ARE THE LIABILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 3. A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES IS REQUIRED AT ALL WATERMAIN AND SEWER MAIN (BUILDING, STORM AND SANITARY) CROSSINGS. B. ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED IN CEAM SPECIFICATIONS EXCEPT AS MODIFIED HEREIN. 1. ALL MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. 2. ALL SANITARY SEWER TO BE PVC SDR -35, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 3. ALL WATERMAIN TO BE DIP CLASS 52, MAINTAIN 7.5' MINIMUM COVER. 4. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE TO BE REINFORCED PIPE CLASS 5 WITH R -4 JOINTS, AND RUBBER GASKETS. C. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULE. EXIT PORCHES. RAMPS. TRUCK DOCKS. PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS. D. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND /OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND, WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE LOCATIONS OF SMALL UTILITIES SHALL BE OBTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR, BY CALLING GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 454 -0002. E. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES OCCURRING DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. F. SAFETY NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS: IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE SOLELY AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY DURING PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. THIS REQUIREMENT WILL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. THE DUTY OF THE ENGINEER OR THE DEVELOPER TO CONDUCT CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THE CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF THE ADEQUACY OF THE CONTRACTOR'S SAFETY MEASURES IN. ON OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. G. ALL AREAS OUTSIDE THE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES THAT ARE DISTURBED BY UTILITY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED IN KIND. SODDED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED WITH 6 INCHES OF TOPSOIL PLACED BENEATH THE SOD. H. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS. DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS. I, ALL SOILS TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY AN INDEPENDENT SOILS ENGINEER. EXCAVATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF REMOVING UNSTABLE OR UNSUITABLE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED AS REQUIRED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE UTILITY BACKFILL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOILS TESTS AND SOIL INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER. J. CURRENT CITY OF EDINA ENGINEERING GUIDELINES SHALL APPLY. K. PARKING LOT AND STREET SWEEPING IS REQUIRED A MINIMUM OF ONCE PER WEEK. LEGEND EXISTING PARKING RAMP SCALE IN FEET 9 • • - j' - THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL C. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING 10 THE GUIDELINES OF CRA5CE 38 -02, TITLED 'STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING • - < •- ' SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA.' THE CONTRACTOR AND /OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR • „ AND /OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE 10 BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES. WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE 70 EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAM TILE NITHIN THE SITE. HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION. SIZE. INVERT AND If THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO ACTIVE DRAIN TAE SHALL BE BACKFILLED W11HOU1 APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER. U) F- W O ZQ z W d � N Y Q N J ? W LIJ o L w � U L y O n b � m4y,hh C t t Q N O m < �c 01 �x z z J J m 0 n O _ s 0 °mJ a � o � c o now m o+ nOp _om ° v o yuo m t main yv m� 0 m u u U o Q m U N vEE� ° E L T O a. VI z � u E 5 S � 3 c e 0_ . o � �o SHEET NUMBER REV. C. 7.01 B MERA FILE 0 15306 Lil EXISTING NE CT TO EXISTING I °. PROPOSED B "WATERMAIN i • FOUND MONUMENT - >- SANITARY SEWER ♦ • I le O MANHOLE STORM SEWER • MANHOLE - >- SANITARY SEWER CATCH BASIN -» -STORM SEWER I n UTILITY POLE -' -WATER 0 FLARED END SECTION - MAIN OVERHEAD WIRES HYDRANT - - -DRAIN TILE .. GATE VALVE ♦ FLARED END SECTION _ -EARS WIRE FENCE 6 U I LDINC LINE EDGE OF TREES WETLAND RIPRAP - I -WATER MAIN - -4o -- CONTOUR $ snte & 620 -G- UNDERGROUND GAS 0 30 60 (SOIL BORING- APPROX. LOC.) -E- UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC -T-UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE EXISTING PARKING RAMP SCALE IN FEET 9 • • - j' - THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL C. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING 10 THE GUIDELINES OF CRA5CE 38 -02, TITLED 'STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING • - < •- ' SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA.' THE CONTRACTOR AND /OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR • „ AND /OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE 10 BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES. WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE 70 EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAM TILE NITHIN THE SITE. HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION. SIZE. INVERT AND If THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO ACTIVE DRAIN TAE SHALL BE BACKFILLED W11HOU1 APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER. U) F- W O ZQ z W d � N Y Q N J ? W LIJ o L w � U L y O n b � m4y,hh C t t Q N O m < �c 01 �x z z J J m 0 n O _ s 0 °mJ a � o � c o now m o+ nOp _om ° v o yuo m t main yv m� 0 m u u U o Q m U N vEE� ° E L T O a. VI z � u E 5 S � 3 c e 0_ . o � �o SHEET NUMBER REV. C. 7.01 B MERA FILE 0 15306 A CONTROL PANEL-_ 4' SCH. 40 STL VENT W/INSECT SCREEN 8' PRECAST REIN'F CONC COVE TOP OF SLAB - ELEV. 856.10 \ LIFTING CABLE - PUMP GUIDE BAR (S)- 72' PRECAST MANHOLE 3' MIN CLEARANCE CONTROL PANEL SUPPORT PLATFORM SEE DETAIL �6" ALJ DOUBLE L JOINT LIMITS OF LIFT STATION - LUMP SUM BID PLAN VIEW 0 8' PE INLET PIPE - ELEV 842.41 HIGH LEVEL ALARM - ELEV 841.91 LAG PUMP ON - ELEV 841.41 4'x6' ECCENTRIC REDUCER LEAD PUMP ON - ELEV 840.91 ` I BOTH PUMPS OFF - ELEV 838.41 LOW LEVEL ALARM - ELEV 837.91 3' MIN CLEARANCE CONTROL PANEL SUPPORT PLATFORM SEE DETAIL �6" ALJ DOUBLE L JOINT LIMITS OF LIFT STATION - LUMP SUM BID PLAN VIEW 0 1:1 ALUMINUM HINGED ACCESS HATCH AND FRAME 4'x6' ECCENTRIC REDUCER 72' PRECAST VAULT 3 3 3 6' PE FORCE MAIN 6' RESTRAINED MECHANICAL JOINT GASKETED FLEXIBLE WATERTIGHT CONNECTION (TYP. PLUG VALVE 6' BEND CHECK VALVE PIPE SUPPORT (BELOW TYP.) SEE DETAIL ALUMINUM ACCESS HATCH AND FRAME . FINISHED GRADE - ELEV. 1-MH STEPS - NEENAH•R- 1981 -J,;'. _ \ OR EQUAL ® 16' O.C. ! 1 8' BOLLARD (TYP.) i---- SEE DETAIL 12' MIN 12' MIN SLOPE SLOPE 6 1/8' /FT 1/8' /FT e 4' SCH. 40 STL, VENT W/INSECT SCREEN N NOTES 1• VERIFY CONTROL PANEL DIMENSIONS W/MANUFACTURER 2. MODIFY CONTROL PANEL SUPPORT PLATFORM DIMENSIONS TO ACCOMMODATE CONTROL PANEL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. 1" EXP. JOINT 5' -0' X 2' -6" ALUMINUM ACCESS HATCH COVER DETAIL +' DIP PVC -NU tt: Ur I JIAIIUIV IJ rKIVAIL 1; INTERME IATE PIPE INV - ELEV. 849.0 GUIDE RAIL SUP ORT 10' O.C. AX 1 PIPE SUPPORT (TYP.) 4' SCH 40 2 -0. SEE DETAIL PVC DRAIN TOP OF FOOTING - ELEV. 847.0 GASKETED FLEXIBLE WATERTIGHT' 1 CONNECTION (TYPICAL AT ALL �- MONOLITHIC BOTTOM SLAB - V V 1 b PVC PIPE PENETRATIONS) 1Q & MANHOLE SECTION DUCKBILL VALVE _ S A ON I NOTES v n 1. PIPING AND STRUCTURAL CHANGES REQUIRED AS A RESULT OF MH I 1 �1�11 2'-6'X 2' -6' I ALUMINUM ACCESS HATCH CONNECT FM TO EXISTING MH I f0 1 ! I 160 LAN SCALE IN FEET z N O W a _U ~ ¢ N rn c w LL 1 ZI Nz z_ I N W C-3 W a is o F th ^ON �xbh .rz NY ^^ h B'ehh No¢ OI C .0 b Y U LL.o W E2 L� zQZ Q Q c N N 0 0 s m u 0 L v " noco vo�o m C n °0 m cam- a om�o 3 m.• m In - c 0 E ° -m = J Smo d °.gym 2 12... P°o EE . Uf 8 a` °a Z3 ES mm c 0 .p C K%W NUMBER REV. C.7.021 A E6RA FLE 0 15.106 1 10 4'x6' ECCENTRIC REDUCER FURNISHING PUMPS WITH A DISCHARGE OTHER THAN 4 WILL BE FURNISHED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. ` I �_ ri I O 2. PROVIDE OVERSIZED HATCH REWIRED AS A RESULT OF ALTERNATE - ' PUMP INSTALLATION AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. _ PLACE GROUT AFTER J i !� 4. PUMPS k PIPING ARE SET SMOOTH FINISH GROUT ALL CLAMPS, NUTS, BOLTS, MOUNTING BRACKETS AND OTHER 1 3. MISCELLANEOUS CONNECTORS LOCATED WITHIN THE WET WELL OR f• + 'O F �,- VALVE MANHOLE ARE TO BE SERIES 300 OR 400 STAINLESS STEEL 1 TOP OF FOOTING - ELEV. 835.91 - ' v v MONOLITHIC 6. (TYP) 1 IL- wl� BOTTOM SLAB AND MANHOLE SECTION LIFT STATION AND VALVE VAULT DETAIL SECTION A -A SCALE: 1/2'= 1' -0' 2'-6'X 2' -6' I ALUMINUM ACCESS HATCH CONNECT FM TO EXISTING MH I f0 1 ! I 160 LAN SCALE IN FEET z N O W a _U ~ ¢ N rn c w LL 1 ZI Nz z_ I N W C-3 W a is o F th ^ON �xbh .rz NY ^^ h B'ehh No¢ OI C .0 b Y U LL.o W E2 L� zQZ Q Q c N N 0 0 s m u 0 L v " noco vo�o m C n °0 m cam- a om�o 3 m.• m In - c 0 E ° -m = J Smo d °.gym 2 12... P°o EE . Uf 8 a` °a Z3 ES mm c 0 .p C K%W NUMBER REV. C.7.021 A E6RA FLE 0 15.106 *NOTE: SEE SHEET C.7.01 FOR SANITARY SEWER DATA SEE SHEET C.7.04 FOR EASEMENT INFORMATION 860 __ -. - .,. _. 8 60 .... ..... -.. ... :. ...: ... ... ... - ... :.. .. - .. - ... ... ... ... .... ExisnNC cROgy .. LEGEND 855 .. ... - _ . - .... '.... .. :: �:� r ... -. .- PROPOSED GROUND -.... ... .: - ::: ::::: "�:: ::: _. _.... _ _ . . ... ...... ..', ..... - .. .......8 " WATERMAIN.:.. -.. __f`i \�:: � .. _ .. .. - 8:50 . ... .......... . �: . �ti 850 —j ..... .. .. .... ...:.. . ....:. - ....... ... ..,. .. ...,._ .. ...... ......X- ING:... .. ...,- .. - ... .,..... ...... ..,. ... ... .. . -... .... ..,. .. - ... ....,. X ?1NG .5: 8o WATERMAIN INV 851.08 PROVIDE MN 7.5' � ... ... .. . ... . .. _ '<:LL''' 845 ... PROVIDE MIN ._ -- — � EXISTING -- ..- . . ...... .. ...._- -,- _ ST SWR .. :_ ....- -- .:..: ._ 3'. CLE:ARANCE..:.: ..... .._ . lNG . - " " " " " " - - " " TOP STORM :PIPE: 844.64 - iTDM WA7ERMAIN E47:40' — _ 840: 8 N SA . WR > _ .. o -. .. _. -, _.. ....._.._. .._.... 840. ... .. - .... . -- .. ... ., . -- ..... ... ... :. ... . - . - .. - .. ... .:.. .: INV= 842.52 _ ... .. _ .:7.5 5T SWR: % -ING °.. .. . , - .. ... ... . . CD 1, 835: . tom B . .. _. _ .... ... . -.- - - ... ;... :- CLEARANCEN - .. 835; • FOUND MONUMENT = SANITARY SEWER THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE ..... ... _ . ........ ...... ..... PLANS IS A UTILITY DUALITY LEVEL C. THIS DUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING 10 THE GUIDELINES OF GIASCE 38102. TITLED STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA.' THE CONTRACTOR AND /OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING _. UTMITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRAC70R AND /OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES. WHICH NIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE MTMN J9R P.0 THE SITE HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION SIZE INVERT AND P THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO ACTIVE DRAM TILE SHALL BE BACKFRLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER. »- 1 O MANHOLE - STORM SEWER '- - -- < m _ lA UTILITY POLE -' -WATER MAIN r jBa - o Ir; -sd3it n g W�gB WQ 4 FLARED END SECTION --- OVERHEAD WIRES - we�pe� - aq B -„_ qAw A U - -- if1 —BARB WIRE FENCE EDGE OF TREES % V -LLLG BUILDING LINE WETLAND t I x _ - -s.w -- CONTOUR + _ (SOIL BORING-APPROX. LOC.) - PROPOSED ,— 0 MANHOLE — >— SANITARY SEWER F'] 0 CATCH BASIN —>>— STORM SEWER HYDRANT - — -DRAIN TILE FRANCE AVENUE If GATE VALVE ♦ FLARED END SECTION RIPRAP I —WATER MAIN 0 50 100 — G — UNDERGROUND GAS —E—UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 8" W A T E R M A I N P R OFILE SCALE IN FEET —7—UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE 860 __ -. - .,. _. 8 60 .... ..... -.. ... :. ...: ... ... ... - ... :.. .. - .. - ... ... ... ... .... ExisnNC cROgy .. _ 855 .. ... - _ . - .... '.... .. :: �:� r ... -. .- PROPOSED GROUND -.... ... .: - ::: ::::: "�:: ::: _. _.... _ _ . . ... ...... ..', ..... - .. .......8 " WATERMAIN.:.. -.. __f`i \�:: � .. _ .. .. - 8:50 . ... .......... . �: . �ti 850 EXISTING ..... .. .. .... ...:.. . ....:. - ....... ... ..,. .. ...,._ .. ...... ......X- ING:... .. ...,- .. - ... .,..... ...... ..,. ... ... .. . -... .... ..,. .. - ... ....,. X ?1NG .5: 8o WATERMAIN INV 851.08 PROVIDE MN 7.5' � ... ... .. . ... . .. ... - - .. ..,... ... ..,. ... - GROUND COVER :. .: - - 845 ... PROVIDE MIN ._ -- — � 845: -- ..- . . ...... .. ...._- -,- _ ST SWR .. :_ ....- -- .:..: ._ 3'. CLE:ARANCE..:.: ..... .._ . lNG . - " " " " " " - - " " TOP STORM :PIPE: 844.64 - iTDM WA7ERMAIN E47:40' — _ 840: 8 N SA . WR > _ .. o -. .. _. -, _.. ....._.._. .._.... 840. ... .. - .... . -- .. ... ., . -- ..... ... ... :. ... . - . - .. - .. ... .:.. .: INV= 842.52 _ ... .. _ .:7.5 5T SWR: % -ING °.. .. . , - .. ... ... . . . : -INV 839.51: �' °° 835: . tom B . .. _. _ .... ... . -.- - - ... ;... :- CLEARANCEN - .. 835; .: THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE ..... ... _ . ........ ...... ..... PLANS IS A UTILITY DUALITY LEVEL C. THIS DUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING 10 THE GUIDELINES OF GIASCE 38102. TITLED STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA.' THE CONTRACTOR AND /OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING _. UTMITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRAC70R AND /OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES. WHICH NIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE MTMN J9R P.0 THE SITE HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION SIZE INVERT AND P THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO ACTIVE DRAM TILE SHALL BE BACKFRLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER. W J 0 0 Of � L3J a U a a cc (n z a a U) I z Ljj W W za U } J H ° °eoy .� c m y b m C yor`O.� H vuh� czn� C CO m o a 4 CI °o� C m 0 0 - o D O O U Q O o c m n o c o ac m`m ow c m c 0 0 umi m n„w o uo m $Em u' °c m =yJ m r � `EEo E C sr o ol t a�� N Z 0 0 w z Z3 s � e � o; m ° OR < SHEET NUMBER REV. C.7 031 A INFRA f4E / T5306 .PI I I I �__» I I� --•t ____ "-- -- --- - - ---- -- JbD I I PROPOSED 40' �RA NI AGE I I AND UTILITY EAS MENT ----------------- _ _ / PER Dx.�•eeers -- _ � 1 � i I . -3rt- .&NV:AlVSCAK Y 1 h i ``:'� Inw,c anew- 'J - _ -- - I I `J !; \ \� � � ; f X U�► a -- — -- - � `, I I I .T % °�f •. °S !rJr i r�' I � i I I_....___ \ '({ `h %.k i- ,'N'i n I< I I I I r j��?• !r rlr`srii`r sr ;� \' � � `'t � � . ! j I � "I l (s �� JfL!l�d.. -_- �$� - h V - I I .�(I � `4 ��J��� r frr �`( � � � s • _ _ _ .tii 1 \ \ \`L__ I _ - dry f'JI'i'\ I I -I �. {rr!ti�r�l�srJr s 1lrfJpjsr'�,v a �>•An � `` � '- � `, I ACAE TRANSIT A I �'JJid! >flJ'J'lttlr rdff�rf??� A { r. � t r r ' (t, dddlfos[I! r •e ) > ' EASEMENT I' e.�nrcaA�wz iJ: ! f Jr,.� •rd a K Y L , - - a VAr ATE UTILITY; ^s 8 o a bL� ENT PROPOSED EN :. y.rlf r,.s frijiJjif�ijp /r d *Vt V Illj I iI R-M EASEMENT '31 .II - - - --- ..__ - -! �t!rdff�.'`ryipfrf i�r i yj \f I I VACATE TRANSIT EASEMENT Jr �• I . 1 s 1,Irsdld! �tJlJa d�f., ddJdlld \� t ,dr , k; dd \ \ VACATE UTILIT�y'""� \- tilid� \fdlJd -yt'yyy�t \241 I I 1- jL'1I1 h 10' ADDITIONAL J -.,SIDEWALK EASEMENT \ \- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ i '.� ` '..�.0 .. - - -_ 1 z .�` \\ \ \ \' % \\ /APR O.N FWTIbN' t L / / ;•,� PROPOSED 15 Al AND UTILITY EA S NT I I P � � t✓ I �', ; I � � - a PROPOSED ROADWAY EASEMENT QU V", �0 I I is I - - -._.. - -' VACA E UTILIT I?I�° � IT j.l - EA E ENT LEGEND EXISTING I I 'j• L, - ",r . •' . ' .' SCALE IN FEET ,fie FXISTNNG PARIfING RAMP THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL C. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING 10 THE GUIDELINES OF CHASCE 38 -02. TITLED - STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA.' THE CONTRACTOR AND /OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTUTIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORN, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR I I e �• AND /OR SUBCONTRAC70R AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE 70 EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). ♦" IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE SITE. HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IWTH THE LOCATION, SIZE. INVERI AND IF THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE, NO ACTIVE DRAW THE SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER_ i I i Ln z w N :2 W N W cy cy tz g N Z W z J a U r C, °voh L ° n n b 4 OT a �d a LL� W U� w z z U J Q Q \ N m n 0 d v d O O O U Q C° yam. ° `C6 nmc' W c v > o 3 `y C � N O n _T r�ri� c J N a0 o •' c E i>o° c E `o _a_ n z o S s s s c e o- . SHEET NUMBER REV. C.7.04 A MFRA FILE i 15706 I•.. I I� PROPOSED I I I f ";� +--- - I • FOUND MONUMENT — >— SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE —>— SANITARY SEWER - - --_ O MANHOLE —„ —STORM SEWER 1,� - - - -�� CATCH BAS IN — »— STORM SEWER R vice -? SL UTILITY POLE — FLARED END SECTION — —WATER MAIN eE — OVERHEAD WIRES HYDRANT - — —DRAIN TILE N GATE VALVE ♦ FLARED END SECTION ( BARB WIRE — FENCE EDGE OF TREES RIPRAP — I —WATER MAIN ��+ BUILD I NG LINE -CONTOUR WETLAND ST119 & B20 G — UNDERGROUND GAS 0 30 60 (SOIL BORING- APPROX. LOC.) —E— UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC —T — UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE I I 'j• L, - ",r . •' . ' .' SCALE IN FEET ,fie FXISTNNG PARIfING RAMP THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL C. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING 10 THE GUIDELINES OF CHASCE 38 -02. TITLED - STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA.' THE CONTRACTOR AND /OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTUTIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORN, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR I I e �• AND /OR SUBCONTRAC70R AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE 70 EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). ♦" IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE SITE. HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IWTH THE LOCATION, SIZE. INVERI AND IF THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE, NO ACTIVE DRAW THE SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER_ i I i Ln z w N :2 W N W cy cy tz g N Z W z J a U r C, °voh L ° n n b 4 OT a �d a LL� W U� w z z U J Q Q \ N m n 0 d v d O O O U Q C° yam. ° `C6 nmc' W c v > o 3 `y C � N O n _T r�ri� c J N a0 o •' c E i>o° c E `o _a_ n z o S s s s c e o- . SHEET NUMBER REV. C.7.04 A MFRA FILE i 15706 *NOTE: ANY STORM SEWER NOT NOTED AS PUBLIC IS PRIVATE Ex STMH B5B.6 (I 191 L, 72' CBMH 1 (10'.10') ___ .- _BRIM: 15 054.30 ).. ....._.. .. ____857. -_ .._.856 PU U O 0 RIM: 855.10 INV 851.30 @59 \� TW - 3IE i C,B.O 0•>T , d 838.03 -W -» INY.. 851.07 -E GB 1B IT RIN: 65: bs INY. • 056 CB 17 (2'IY) ua)m PA RIM: 854.80 y�, CB 7 (2'.3') 1 V: 851.80 -N 6N 0 RIM: 855.40 V 6 i INV 851.50 -5 V A I l� ( �� f � CBU14 14 & erg I• I i IK- 855 _ _ 0�3 1_ il \U - _. - -.. - 40 LF 12• IT - - O 0.75% CLASS 5 v 065 CBMM (487 V CBLR1 5 (48') RETAI RIM: 854.50 _1- __ RIM: 854.50 - -- NY est.2D -E ! 20.6UO-GSF- L. INY. B5a73 -S a0 ' 15K S.F. BASE INV. Sa9J -W -A.; ; S.F. 36 u )Z RCP -_- - SK - -- FFE =868. o a7 Xr m MCI tOk Ri 61 LF 12' RCP 74 STORY ON TOP OF O 1.75% CLASS 5 PARKING PODIUM (3 LEVELS ABOVE GRADE, 2s 11' CP u-----2-LEVELS- BELOW)-- --- '- - --- _____ - 0 15 %uAss FFE 855 5 - CBMH' a (2'.3'j� �- �Y 855. 90) � a $ - - RIM: 853.90 ._ V INV. B49.46-S! -__ IN V INY Q \ \ \� ' Y 849 -86 W - ERRACE RETAIL 2 . .._ ¢i 85J 5,240 GSF - - - ' FFE= 868 0 ° TOP FLOOR _ y tI RESTAURANT a 7K GSF DOWN FFE =853.0 RIM: -_ . • _ _ __ ...T{ INY FI_ �J IV, F RETAIL 3 DISRUPTIONS OF SERVICE 70 THE PUBLIC ARE THE LIABILITY 8,850 GSf_. FFE = 868.0 ! ` TOP FLOOR WATERMAIN AND SEWER MAIN (BUILDING, STORM AND SANITARY) CROSSINGS. .___..._ _._ RETAIL 6 BEI 12K GSF B TERRACE - - 318.000 GSF FFE =853. -- ___77 RE:TAN14 J CB 9 (77') U: 85 STUN INY 7,)_- 4 RIM: / 7• INV: 834 IT LF 72 RCP / � - rRUFnb RIM: 852.8 J: 832.60 -SE r., 3 78 NW 5.i. W I °s7jtic \c' °G c° 1 RIM' 1 S / 126 LF B' TREN _ DRAIN LEAD SEE SHEET C.8.02 FOR 72" STORM PROFILE SEE SHEE C.8.03 FOR INFILTRATION /DRAIN TILE PLAN » UTILITY CONSTRUCTION NOTES A. THE UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 'STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATIONS' AS PUBLISHED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), EXCEPT AS MODIFIED HEREIN. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THESE SPECIFICATIONS. 1. ALL UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE TO CITY OF EDINA ENGINEERING GUIDELINES, 2006 EDITION. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPEN. TURN OFF, INTERFERE WITH, OR ATTACH ANY PIPE OR HOSE TO OR TAP WATERMAIN BELONGING TO THE CITY UNLESS DULY AUTHORIZED TO DO SO BY THE CITY. ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OF ANY SCHEDULED OR UNSCHEDULED DISRUPTIONS OF SERVICE 70 THE PUBLIC ARE THE LIABILITY 666 _ -_ 15.000 1 SF STMH 13 (48- WATERMAIN AND SEWER MAIN (BUILDING, STORM AND SANITARY) CROSSINGS. RIM: 852.50 i LEGEND 12K GSF B SE I AS MODIFIED HEREIN. 1. ALL MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE JK GSF ME ANIN 2. ALL SANITARY SEWER TO BE PVC SDR -35, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 3. ALL WATERMAIN TO BE DIP CLASS 52, MAINTAIN 7.5' MINIMUM COVER. F E =8 i8.0 (TMH RUBBER GASKETS. 665 - - -- - TOP FLC OR INY 844.6 (Ex) LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULE, EXIT PORCHES, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS. PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS. J CB 9 (77') U: 85 STUN INY 7,)_- 4 RIM: / 7• INV: 834 IT LF 72 RCP / � - rRUFnb RIM: 852.8 J: 832.60 -SE r., 3 78 NW 5.i. W I °s7jtic \c' °G c° 1 RIM' 1 S / 126 LF B' TREN _ DRAIN LEAD SEE SHEET C.8.02 FOR 72" STORM PROFILE SEE SHEE C.8.03 FOR INFILTRATION /DRAIN TILE PLAN » UTILITY CONSTRUCTION NOTES A. THE UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 'STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATIONS' AS PUBLISHED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), EXCEPT AS MODIFIED HEREIN. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THESE SPECIFICATIONS. 1. ALL UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE TO CITY OF EDINA ENGINEERING GUIDELINES, 2006 EDITION. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPEN. TURN OFF, INTERFERE WITH, OR ATTACH ANY PIPE OR HOSE TO OR TAP WATERMAIN BELONGING TO THE CITY UNLESS DULY AUTHORIZED TO DO SO BY THE CITY. ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OF ANY SCHEDULED OR UNSCHEDULED TRENCH DRAIN RIM 8S.5 \i 27 LF 8' TRENCH )•LjJ. �. D AIN.LEAD I .. RESTAURANT EX. sl „ 6K GSF ONE STORY RIM: 848.19 FFE =853.0 INV. 872.00 (EX: I'. • .Y p�N �`pppE \\\ (3) -42" FES INV. 830.91 OBTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR, BY CALLING GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 454 -0002. E. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE 10 ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES 78 LI OCCURRING DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. = 2g - - -< F. SAFETY NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS: IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY (EXISTING) 12• FES ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE SOLELY INV. 831.BD AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY DURING PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. THIS REQUIREMENT WILL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. THE DUTY OF THE ENGINEER OR THE DEVELOPER TO CONDUCT CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THE CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE RENEW OF THE ADEQUACY OF THE CONTRACTOR'S SAFETY MEASURES IN, ON OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. G. ALL AREAS OUTSIDE THE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES THAT ARE DISTURBED BY UTILITY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED IN KIND. SODDED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED WITH 6 INCHES OF TOPSOIL PLACED BENEATH THE SOD. H. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS. DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS. I. ALL SOILS TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY AN INDEPENDENT SOILS ENGINEER. EXCAVATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF REMOVING UNSTABLE OR UNSUITABLE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED AS REQUIRED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE UTILITY BACKFILL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOILS TESTS AND SOIL INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER. J. CURRENT CITY OF EDINA ENGINEERING GUIDELINES SHALL APPLY. K. PARKING LOT AND STREET SWEEPING IS REQUIRED A MINIMUM OF ONCE PER WEEK. DISRUPTIONS OF SERVICE 70 THE PUBLIC ARE THE LIABILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. -( >- - >' - -> 3. A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES IS REQUIRED AT ALL STMH 13 (48- WATERMAIN AND SEWER MAIN (BUILDING, STORM AND SANITARY) CROSSINGS. RIM: 852.50 i LEGEND WY. 849.48 -S/W B. ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED IN CEAM SPECIFICATIONS EXCEPT I AS MODIFIED HEREIN. 1. ALL MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. 2. ALL SANITARY SEWER TO BE PVC SDR -35, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 3. ALL WATERMAIN TO BE DIP CLASS 52, MAINTAIN 7.5' MINIMUM COVER. 4. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE TO BE REINFORCED PIPE CLASS 5 WITH R -4 JOINTS, AND (TMH RUBBER GASKETS. STMH 12 (48 -) RIM, 651.11 C. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT INY 844.6 (Ex) LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULE, EXIT PORCHES, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS. PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS. D. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND /OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND, WHERE la: POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT Ex L RIM, 646.26 SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS INY 840.40 (EX) SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE LOCATIONS OF SMALL UTILITIES SHALL BE TRENCH DRAIN RIM 8S.5 \i 27 LF 8' TRENCH )•LjJ. �. D AIN.LEAD I .. RESTAURANT EX. sl „ 6K GSF ONE STORY RIM: 848.19 FFE =853.0 INV. 872.00 (EX: I'. • .Y p�N �`pppE \\\ (3) -42" FES INV. 830.91 OBTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR, BY CALLING GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 454 -0002. E. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE 10 ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES 78 LI OCCURRING DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. = 2g - - -< F. SAFETY NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS: IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY (EXISTING) 12• FES ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE SOLELY INV. 831.BD AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY DURING PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. THIS REQUIREMENT WILL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. THE DUTY OF THE ENGINEER OR THE DEVELOPER TO CONDUCT CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THE CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE RENEW OF THE ADEQUACY OF THE CONTRACTOR'S SAFETY MEASURES IN, ON OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. G. ALL AREAS OUTSIDE THE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES THAT ARE DISTURBED BY UTILITY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED IN KIND. SODDED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED WITH 6 INCHES OF TOPSOIL PLACED BENEATH THE SOD. H. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS. DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS. I. ALL SOILS TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY AN INDEPENDENT SOILS ENGINEER. EXCAVATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF REMOVING UNSTABLE OR UNSUITABLE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED AS REQUIRED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE UTILITY BACKFILL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOILS TESTS AND SOIL INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER. J. CURRENT CITY OF EDINA ENGINEERING GUIDELINES SHALL APPLY. K. PARKING LOT AND STREET SWEEPING IS REQUIRED A MINIMUM OF ONCE PER WEEK. N �- W z U a H Q J (� _z 3 LLJ Q V) d (n M. ? W °w V) (n U r.31 a N Q. N L y N N .0 Q� °k N° � O 4 CT e .0 RI) TI) � s„ .0 �l� I I z z j J Q Q \ U N 0 n 0 m � 0 0 d nqW � c m rn ° a H o °'m °m v n T o ° ° - : u 0. yOai _ u 4 J tE° J O C T -' t E E O ° s G z o C o k o° 's 8 E 5 S v,00 B 1Yi < m SHEET NUMBER REV. C.8.01 B MFRA FILE 1 15305 664 \650 J i LEGEND m la: EXISTING PROPOSED a� ° CRM: IT (2'. ) I ° FOUND MONUMENT - >- SANITARY SEWER • MANHOLE ->- SANITARY SEWER 659 -» O MANHOLE -STORM SEWER CATCH BASIN - »- STORM SEWER INV: e4saD -[ m Ex. STM 19 UTILITY POLE -WATER MAIN + HYDRANT - - -DRAIN TILE s56 R" INV: 842.1 (EX.) 0 FLARED END SECTION —OVERHEAD WIRES H GATE VALVE ♦ FLARED END SECTION '•!: we 842.5 W /(EX) -BARB WIRE FENCE EDGE OF TREES RIPRAP - I -WATER MAIN - /1111GBUILDING LINE WETLAND -c- UNDERGROUND GAS / ,• ' 0 30 60 - -vm -- CONTOUR $ & B20 -E- UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC _ (T119 SOIL BORING- APPROX. LOC.) RAMP - T - UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE EXISTING' PARKING • ? SCALE IN FEET - - •• THG SUBSUgF4CE ,UhUTY INFORMATION SBOWN .bN TRESE• ANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL C. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CIIASCE 38 -02. TITLED'S7ANDARO GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING • SUBSUREAC UIIDTY DATA .I THE. L9f4IRACTOR'AAD /OR FU ONTRACTORS SMALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MWNESOIA). THE CONTRACTOR ' AMD /Ck 5 @COhAACTOR rGREE. 76 Be FULLY FLSPONSIBLE• OR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES. YM104 MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY MS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). V THE. CONTRACj6R ADUNTNIR .'ANYJ)RAIL2 TILE WITHIN SITE. HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION. SIZE. INVERT AND IF THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO ACTIVE DRAIN TILE SHALL BE BACXFILLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER. N �- W z U a H Q J (� _z 3 LLJ Q V) d (n M. ? W °w V) (n U r.31 a N Q. N L y N N .0 Q� °k N° � O 4 CT e .0 RI) TI) � s„ .0 �l� I I z z j J Q Q \ U N 0 n 0 m � 0 0 d nqW � c m rn ° a H o °'m °m v n T o ° ° - : u 0. yOai _ u 4 J tE° J O C T -' t E E O ° s G z o C o k o° 's 8 E 5 S v,00 B 1Yi < m SHEET NUMBER REV. C.8.01 B MFRA FILE 1 15305 'NOTE: ANY STORM SEWER NOT NOTED AS PUBLIC IS PRIVATE 860 . .: .. `gip j� :�EXISTING.GROUNO. .. :' :� :� :.�- - - - I - LEGEND .- . a - - ... - ...- - - ---- -- ... ... -- 855 _. _. .. ..... —_ _ : EXISTING U _ .. ....` .. — ,_ _ - - _ _. _.. ........:. _........... .... .. .. ..... .... -. ... ....., .....- ............ :..-- .,. - f _HYDRAULIC. -,.. - _ .. 1 • FOUND MONUMENT — > —SANITARY SEWER _ -... ....... _ _ .GRADE f_ — 850 ° m J O MANHOLE — » _STORM SEWER - -___ _ -j� ',N o _ n� ! rg0 0 UTILITY POLE —WATER MAIN . _.... _ '. ...... : -..... ... -. .... -. -...: - „ .... .. :... ':::8•: WAIERMAIN :CROSSING __ - ... .. _ �INV= E � HYORgUL �� .... ' :�. ...,, ... ',' -- ;� (aj . ....... ..., -..- -..... ...... .. _.,., - . :: : : : :: 0000 - 0000 Q 85f.Df - ... :: -. A FLARED END SECTION ---OVERHEAD WIRES .... .. :: ... -... ... ..--- -- --- .. .. - -.. ...- -- :.,. .:. ... : . .. ..... ..... 845.: ! .... ...- ..WATERMAIN PROFILE ---- :: 0000 .... 12'. ST:SWR- e6 Wy up -- wsLLp l —• —BARB WIRE FENCE EDGE OF TREES .. ... .. - ... .. - - - ..... .. -- -- -- ..., .., - - ....... - ... - -- .... - - -- .. _... „ _': --...... - - .. -- - . -„ - -iNV= 850:10 CR ... ....... - --, L :... L WETLAND 840 _: .... _. . -_. .. _. CCONTTOUR + ST119 & B20 I I,! 000 0 �` `-.VHWL B'LT' 72 RCP - ....... �, -. ' " O'03OX CLASS 3 1 ... -- -- - - - - -- APPROX LO (SOIL BORING- - C) . QH I - vNwL PROPOSED - . ..... .... . .. . ..... - - -. ,) IF 0 MANHOLE —>— SANITARY SEWER g e s ... _ -.... ..... .... -.. - 835. 0 CATCH BASIN —>>—STORM SEWER FRANCE AVENUE 4- HYDRANT - — -DRAIN TILE _. . . .: : w GATE VALVE ♦ FLARED END SECTION _ . RIPRAP —I —WATER MAIN I I 50 100 —G— UNDERGROUND GAS 72 L" STORM . -. . -.. ...., . ...., -195 U 77 RC�' S E W E R PROFILE O O Z: .30 CLASS : 110 LF 72 RCP 00.305 CLASS J � - ) f ( E— SCALE IN FEET — r — UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE 860 . .: .. ...... . ..... ..... . .... .... :.................. ...... .. j� :�EXISTING.GROUNO. .. :' :� :� :.�- - - - ... .- . ., _ . -..... .........- .,, -,.,. - ..... - - ... - ...- PROPOSED GROUND- - ---- -- ... ... ... 855 _. _. .. ..... —_ _ : _ .. ....` .. — ,_ _ E TING GROUND- ' - _ _. _.. ........:. _........... .... .. .. ..... .... -. ... ....., .....- ............ :..-- .,. - f _HYDRAULIC. -,.. - _ .. ..... .., .. . -,..., ..... .... -.. _ -... ....... _ _ .GRADE f_ 850 - -___ _ 850:: .. ...... ... — ,2 ST, SING _ 1 . ... . _.... _ '. ...... : -..... ... -. .... -. -...: - „ .... .. :... ':::8•: WAIERMAIN :CROSSING __ - ... .. _ �INV= E � HYORgUL �� .... ' :�. ...,, ... ',' -- .. ....... .... .. ..... -... -- .... .. ..... - -. -- -- - . . ....... ..., -..- -..... ...... .. _.,., - . :: : : : :: 0000 - 0000 I : :: _ : : :SE£_UTILITY PLAN: FOR _-�: 85f.Df - ... :: -. „ GRADE -- IUJE 0000 : : \ : :: ... .. .... .. :: ... -... ... ..--- -- --- .. .. - -.. ...- -- :.,. .:. ... : . .. ..... ..... 845.: ! .... ...- ..WATERMAIN PROFILE ---- :: 0000 .... 12'. ST:SWR- ... .. ..,. -.. ... ., -- .., . -.. _.. - _ ....... .. ..... . ..... ...... ,< =INCA .. ... .. - ... .. - - - ..... .. -- -- -- ..., .., - - ....... - ... - -- .... - - -- .. _... „ _': --...... - - .. -- - . -„ - -iNV= 850:10 CR ... ....... - --, :... ..... ... - .. IE � 842.4% - - -.. 840 _: .... _. . -_. .. _. . . I I,! 000 0 �` `-.VHWL B'LT' 72 RCP - ....... �, -. ' " O'03OX CLASS 3 1 ... I - vNwL - . ..... .... . .. . ..... - - -. . : :. :. .0 :100.30 - -.... - - .... .. ... _ -.... ..... .... -.. - 835. %CLARCP.. .........:O DJOx CLASS 3. ,.... :: 00_.00 ! .0000 0__000:. -.... .. ... .... I:. .. - ...... ... -. ... ... _. . . .: : t' _ . I _ _ - .. . -. . -.. ...., . ...., -195 U 77 RC�' � I ... . O O Z: .30 CLASS : 110 LF 72 RCP 00.305 CLASS J � - ) f ( 830 _ ................... :........ .., ..... -..- ..... -., ....., .:., .. . ... _ - � .. I .. 2 112 LT '', ei RCP I ISTING ... .. - ... - ..... - ..... .. - - . :... - ... - :..... ...: - . - ... - .. - . 1 .. . ...... . .... .. .: :. ... .. .... .. -.... - - - : . .. ... .... ......: ... ... . 0 0 0 0 :: :: : :: . : :: ! :: : : :. - - .. ! ........ - : :....(. ..:.. : :: - . .... ... :ICBMH 1.(10`x1 O')::.. ..: T I STMH 2 (10'x10•) TO xT O� . -tt8 LF.- :- N2'.RCP.. ..)... p. -_ t4 3 CLASS J (EXISTING - - ....... - ....... 3 -A2' F0 -..,,. - ... . - ... . -.. -. - :. _ ..... - . ..... - .. EX .STMH..:..-- .- ... :.. :. - CASTING ....:. . . . . . ...... - . ... .. .. - - CASTING R 3248 ...... - - - . LASTING R I6 AP : - - - R- 1642 -- ..... .. - - Ilp: 18.00':: _ IE= 830.91 .. .. - . . ... . . . .. . ........ . . . . ...... . .... ... ...... .. ... : -. . - :. - -... -- ...... : -.. ....: .... - - .... ... BURDs: 20, 0': ::'--. ...:.. ... :.. -. - ..... - UILD - 19.88 - - :E_ 855.10..,- .... -.. -.: - BUILD - Ifi 67 RE:= ',851.30 . - -., .. 6834..30- -. ., -..... .. .. ... .. .... - . .... ... ..... -.... - - -..... E= 858.6..:. - - -- ... :. -.. :..- - .... .. E 835:22 -72 . 5...... - ...: IE- 834 63 SE /N E 72 -SE/NW E. 846.38 ., -.- E.. =8.386 -72` [..... -. _ ....... . .. _,:.__' ... E... 638.03.:72 ',W. -- 0.00.0. ..- . :. :,' : :... :....:.: - � IE. =847.80.- ]B...N: .. - 18,7. � . -t2- :NW . . ... - ' - - -IE. 851.01 -15' E: - - - - ... - -, E%. -.... -, - .... -- .. ...:. ....,...... - ..... ..... ... ..CASTING,,,:. CASTING ...... .. -... ... ... .... : ............. .... ... -- - ..... 00... RE.= 852,80 ', :: - . ... .. .... . '..... . -..... - ... :..... � .... .... � � IE.6 832.6 42• }). E - .: : . - .... .. .. .. ...: 1E. =83A28 -.724 11W - :. . : :: _: : :.. :. .. .: :.'. .. ... .. - 3 .::d . ....3,- .. 3 a .. :. .,.. .. _x .. _. -.3 ... .. .. B. a a .. - -, -_. e: .: - 3 " :.: _ .. i :- i a __ .. - ... - :. -- :: : : :.. -- - :: . :. -..- ... THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL C THIS DUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES O ONSCE b _- __ ... ... . ........ ... -... 38 -02. TITLED 'STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA.' THE CONTRACTOR AND /OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING .. ... __.. _. UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND /OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE SITE HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION, SRE, INVERT AND I THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO ACTIVE DRAIN TILE SHALL BE BAOLFRLED MTHMI APPROVAI FROM OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TNF PRRffT FNGNFFR TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). W J N O Ll '— LEJ Of () a P a d -a..3 �zw Lu o L.3 O N U O I- N u h b 0 .C' P�mk O m o R R N • 4 OT a .0 R`i c U Eo Lu E� 0 0 0 0 n 0 vd O O U Q r m�a d nc v °C Om °mow c oS Tim _ oa vt v v cm ° > m W J �E 3 O at v v n m ° o d — tEEa � E n ° w Z O 0 i E S c 6 � o �z SHEET NUMBER REV. C 8 021 A YFRA FILE 1 15.305 _ - -- - _857 856 -- —.. -_ - - _. 856- e6D. > s6` eSt V j I TIC ^ _ , 1._ y _ 0 I V nROTEcrRA IN AWNEIR4 I I< B• PERFOf1AD 3 - V I DRAINTILE' bb ,� ROOF DRAIN V IIy. EL � OVERROW ® tr$ 0 I V I� rtOW DRAW \ RETAIL 3,OC I g6A I L � AREA 13 006 sq Il -\ • : ) / •• DRAIN FIELD 1 'T -� / . `AREA 1,660, q.lt TIT , I I I t - L DRAIN RO i RESTAURANT ROOF /.faS ROOF DRAIN" ,AREA: 12,449 sg11' ' 1.. ..� OVERFLOW R IN " , i R00f ORAINr - / t�Sl' `\ 12• RFO'ATCD "' RESTAURANT , , "r DRAIN -fIEID DEEP RO 0 }�` ?r'< \ RAN y' ARCH 2108 sy11 I �- / DATIVES I " - -� - -- j ii Y E S f,S ,ROOF DRAIN - ( ; i . ( - z ✓ OF DRAIN I _RETAIL -1 ROOF _ �% -� / - ', AREA. 33.118 sq fl ' 12• PERT lC ` -�' f `7E nvE _ ' DRAINTIIE �J. ROOF GRAIN ': •� \ \,` ) /�PPO ONSIRILCTIbN EAS - - - -- -,T RCTAU -(z�i x /\ j DRAIN -FIELD -mil / AREA. 6.324 sq H . ,.• x. / /-. // ./ i 86) .. I \ CEP 865 INSTALL a- ORAINTILE .ARDUNp BUILDING FOR ,i 1"(m'��50 I I- FLOOD PROTECTION {L 88 I s 1 x �rv,11 I \ R F DRAIN', 8497• F 85a , , e�C V B• PCRFORATEG DRAINTILE r i NV. ROOF DRA \ I•` OVERFLO I i j m T f4TING PARKING TRAMP 9 ° THGSUBSURF9CE •UTILITY INFORMATION SBOWN.DJT'TAESE• ANS IS A UTILITY DUALITY LEVEL G THIS DUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CIIASCE 38 -02, TITLED 'STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING • SUBSUREACj UTILTTY OATA.V THE•CONTRACTOR AhD /OR �6U ONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENGNG WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AMD /ORS @CONTI'AACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE, OR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE 70 EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). • IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUMTERS•SLNY•DRAtr TILE M11NN TH SITE, HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION, SIZE. INVERT AND IF THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO ACTIVE DRAIN TILE SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER. 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET Z in U Q F7- Lu O cy H N cy Z (n 2: L3 I a Qf N a V1 0 z W _ LTJ �w Q J U z ~ y b I Z3 o n tz ccn .!; Q c o N � � O 4 O, o .0 C U yo Lu e � {' U. 1 �1 Z Z U j Q Q W N 0 dy n%w c m _o m u ° u o v !a t c 0 � � 0 0 ai dEE� E nz o E 5 Nm C c Oe O_ SHEET NUMBCR REV. C.8.03 A MFRA FILE 1 15306 LEGEND EXISTING • FOUND MONUMENT — > —SANITARY SEWER O MANHOLE " —STORM SEWER LA UTILITY POLE — I —WATER MAIN D FLARED END SECTION —OVERHEAD — OVERHEAD WIRES • BARB WIRE FENCE EDGE OF TREES //-////BUILDING LINE WETLAND -slo -- CONTOUR + ST119 & B20 (SOIL BORING- APPROX. LOC.) PROPOSED MANHOLE —SANITARY — SANITARY SEWER CATCH BASIN —»— STORM SEWER 4- HYDRANT — — —DRAIN TILE IH GATE VALVE ♦ FLARED END SECTION RIPRAP —1 —WATER MAIN — G — UNDERGROUND GAS — E —UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC — T —UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET Z in U Q F7- Lu O cy H N cy Z (n 2: L3 I a Qf N a V1 0 z W _ LTJ �w Q J U z ~ y b I Z3 o n tz ccn .!; Q c o N � � O 4 O, o .0 C U yo Lu e � {' U. 1 �1 Z Z U j Q Q W N 0 dy n%w c m _o m u ° u o v !a t c 0 � � 0 0 ai dEE� E nz o E 5 Nm C c Oe O_ SHEET NUMBCR REV. C.8.03 A MFRA FILE 1 15306 HYDRANT FLAG MBE Mr ]INSTALLED BM THE ICE SECTION. T.r WITH 0 6-am O —i TGATE VALVE AbApTm RULER GASKET KIM 22• INSTALLED BETWEEN GATE GRIEVGROL14LDIE VALVE AND E UNDISTURBED I m Yu CLEM SOILS ROCIC COVER V/ a "Yam LV. ADAPTER POLVETKnix SEE THOUST SLUM S. RIP P BUNY STANDARD "TE RESILIONT WEDGE VALVE VATEIADR HTIVANT &4QJL BE WATEROUS W 7-M WITH TWO FIVE INCH M STINOt PUMPER PIPE an N=LES WITH W BREAK OFF SEND ALL HTIRAMTS AND GATE VALVES SMALL HAVE 041N OCAL JOINT CONNECTION& rASNG ro VV m___ BELOW FINISH BLACKTOP HYDRANTS To CONFM WITH DIMENSIONAL REOUIREMEMIS FOR NownREADED COMMEOUNIS DI am ACEUMNMIE WITH MFPA 1963 STANDARDS FOR FIRE NOCE CONNEC"[POL D1 ALL VALVES TO 11R COUNTER-CLOCKV13t, PROEtfS. ALL RAC FLU. SMALL BE PROESy COIVACTEZ, 03 E HYDRANT FLAGS FR FIRE HYDRANT ARE REOUIRCO CCANDYCANE SYNC FLAG, 6 CONCRETE , 1 REIM BASE. A OE -FECCE HEAVY DUTY OPERATING VALVE FBID IS REQUIRED ON HYDRANTS THAT ARE CASTING MEEHAN R-17= SELF SEALING M, WFIM EXTENDED Be OR MORE. —MECHAMICALI COMPACTED WHEN DRETALLING A HYDRANT AID) EXTENSION, THE MIDGIREAKABLE CIRPUDS REEVES GO ON HY THE BOTTOM AND THE ZtEAKABUt SUMS GO ON THE TOP OF THE CITENSICIN RDIL �EOUAL LIX FIRE HYDRANT& SHWL BE PAIMTEB m AT THE rAcTENT. 1,-.r F YvRm, ALL PIPE — riTrv= AND MEGA LUG ALL FYTTEfS r.or MID11LOOK HfORMTS SMALL BE DZIALLED WITH NOMJM AT 47 TO ROADWAY BASSO, LETTERS. CORNER MfnMTS SHALL BE DSTALLED WITH EACH M12LE PERPCMMXM TO ROADWAY X-C CITY OF EDINA 4'-0* r-r RESUTREB a Tr. Mm SC �0�' P IN.", ENGINEERING r-e REVISED 1I.D PLATE & PUBLIC HYDRANT AND GATE VALVE 01-06 S-6, WORK S 5-6- :YxPswmoN 100 DEPTS PER N� DETAIL REINFORCED TEE AND wo'CE om SEE NOTE PLAN - 90' BENDS Ltp� ;zz:::�PLACE PLASTIC SHM-11149 AGAINST PIPE AS SHORN .4 CONCRETE SMALL BE IN CONTACT WITH TIES KAAONNf WPM BEDDING MATIOtIAL UNDISTURBED EARTH COMCItam APPROXIMATE 10 SLOPE OHM OEM BOUM PIPE DICER Or. SECTION A-A EE NOTE t - SEE BUTTRESS DIMENSIONS PIPE an ..N.OUE ORRIS AND SEND AV rASNG ro VV m___ BELOW FINISH BLACKTOP HOPE ADJUSTING RINGS AS REQUIRED (HIM Z-e, MAX 5-r am B1 D1 -2 PROEtfS. B3 03 EACH HOPE ADJUSTING Ron 6 CONCRETE , 1 REIM BASE. CASTING MEEHAN R-17= SELF SEALING M, WFIM EXTERNAL SEAL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON CON.IUNCTUCIN —MECHAMICALI COMPACTED A.2 TWO CONCEALCD — HOLES OR HY -V �EOUAL LIX r-" 1,-.r OOLL BE LETTERED B' r.or BASSO, LETTERS. V-10, X-C HOPE AL� RING, AS 4'-0* r-r RESUTREB a Tr. Mm SC r-e Y-10, S-01 V-21 SHALL BE 20' S-6, WITH RING AND CASTING ASSOKBLI 5-6- :YxPswmoN W-C 4!-C• PER N� DETAIL REINFORCED TEE AND wo'CE om PLATE 'UBC TO ASTM [ION SNA,LXE� S.-C, CASTDG ASSEMBLY. FULL LENGTH OF UDC CONCRETE COLLAR TO ENCASE JRRS BETWEEN SECTIONS W USE _X 7 IOIG SHALL BE USED FOR CONCRETE COL AAIL r To z- SECTION cwa 6• REINFORCED San- CONCRETE SLAB Y(SEE OUTSIDE NBP TO BE �DOT STD PL . 40M KCO.MES 10 "'NBUE WITH I A a. GA. arAL STADA.ESS STEEL. CnOMI f1AHP VIN SIMBISS STEEL SWAPS WITH AN, BRIf �St BOO, B, NPC MOLTS RIMJ C&R. APPROVED Er E.. FVC SR TO PIPE AND FFFIINGS TO D FOR 5. SUCIMB, S S BE E_ TB OB.ET I'lE JOINTS BETWEEN PRECAST USE BUY SECTIONS SHALL USE AID MDENANIEALLY . . . . . . . . . . . (OPACT. .. KCANCALLT coPw CONFORMING TO ASTH 0443 . A' 314� OROBNMY CTSO, OMPAC CITY OF EDINA ENGINEERING REVISED STANDARD PLATE & PUBLIC SANITARY DROP MANHOLE 04-05 WORK S 6• REIIiRCED 205 DEPTS COCRETE BASE SEE NOTE PLAN - 90' BENDS Ltp� ;zz:::�PLACE PLASTIC SHM-11149 AGAINST PIPE AS SHORN .4 CONCRETE SMALL BE IN CONTACT WITH TIES KAAONNf WPM BEDDING MATIOtIAL UNDISTURBED EARTH COMCItam APPROXIMATE 10 SLOPE OHM OEM BOUM PIPE DICER Or. SECTION A-A EE NOTE t - SEE BUTTRESS DIMENSIONS PIPE an 22 1/1 SEND AV Dim HOPE ADJUSTING RINGS AS REQUIRED (HIM Z-e, MAX 5-r am B1 D1 -2 D 2 B3 03 EACH HOPE ADJUSTING Ron 6 CONCRETE , 1 REIM BASE. EXTERNAL SEAL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON CON.IUNCTUCIN —MECHAMICALI COMPACTED f-r HY -V 1' -Y r-" 1,-.r r-a' r.or V-10, X-C r-or 4'-0* r-r r-e Y-10, S-01 V-21 Y-B` 20' S-6, r-w 5-6- X-C W-C 4!-C• 2e t-41 s-c• W-ur X-10r 91-a' S.-C, -CITY OF EDINA ENGINEERING & PUBLIC WORKS DEPTS. PLAN - 45' BENDS ,j%ffiP I. DIMENSIONS IN TABLE AM BASm ON A WATER PRESSI= OF IUD PSI AM AM EARTH RESISTANCE OF I TOM PER SQ, FT. I WOOD BLOCKING PERMITTED ONLY INCH COMPLETELY ENCASED IN MIXED CONCRETE I DINE0NDOM 0J=C3 SHOULD BE AS LAM EMOUGN 70 MAKE ANDUE k 45 DEGREES. A DIENSKIN AIAW SHOULD BE ASLANSEAS WM I" BOLTS POSSIBLE NIHOUT 5. SHAPE OF BACK OF BUTTRESS MY VARY AS LONG AS POUR IS AGAJNST FIRM UNDISTURBED EM7H. MIXED CONCRETE THRUST 13 O 7. MY BE USED DMOT SPEC, 24611• GRADE W) REVISED STANDARD PLATE CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK 04-05 1 120 36 3/ 6• 37 3/4• 3. 7YP. r 6 31w-4 I.- 24' 47 31• CATCHBASIM CASTING HOPE AILIUSTING RINGS A& NEENAH R-3067-V. RECLINED OUN L-r, MAX 5-2- HEIGHT). BUTYL SEALANT SMALL BE APPLIED BETWEEN EACH HOPE ADAX71MG RING EXTERNAL SEAL SMALL BE DISTALLED DO C04AM ZON WITH ADJUSTIBIG ODES AND CASTING ASSEMBLY WHEN HOUZONTAL ADJUSTMENTS ARE REWIRED, CONCRETE ADJUSTING RUGS MY BE USED MORTAR BETWEEN CASTING. COHERE ADAISTING RINGS, NO ST MIN I AND MAK. IZ' IN HEIGHT FOR CONCRETE ADJUSTMENT RINGS. ROT BEDJ. EXTERNAL SEAL SHALL BE INSTALLED IN CONJUNIC ION 24' X 36' PRECAST WITH ADJUSTING RINGS AND R Z. CASTING ASSEMBLY. EbIFORCED CONCRETE CONCRETE COLLAR 70 ENCASE CASTING AND RINGS. CURB MIX SMALL. BE USED FOR CONCRETE COULAIL SLOPE BENCHES r PER FONT. FLOW - O 6' PRECAST REINFORCE CONCRETE BASE. MECHANICALLY COMPACT GRANULAR MAIERLAIL FOR LEVELING (NIVICIT 31492F) (ORDINARY C13HPACTICM CITY OF EDINA I REVtSED, LSTANDARDI ENGINEERING TYPE "BB" CATCH PLATE & PUBLIC 04-05 @ WORKS BASIN 220 220 DEPTS. I DR MUIO_LER COVER N L" In e. LABELED WATER GATE VALVE ADAPTED TOP 6-1/4 ,.. STEEL V"H PROTECTIVE C04TING, > Me RUBBER GASKET WATER METALLED BETWEEN GATE _LwT _LI-q-uB--4 VALVE AND ADAPTOR. 581E �t 7 L FMnSHED RAE TOP SECT]IO�N- -1/9 ADAIST TOP TO I/r 30" BLACKTOP GRAM OR I- BELOW FINISHED BOULEVARD -1/2 GRABS AND SHALL SET T! SO AS TO PROVIDE 1? 13F _R on 50, 59 & 60) UPWARD ADJUSTMENT. TyLr MUELLER On 58 & 59) T_E- YPE, WHREE PIECE S _ 51/4' SINkFT, SIZE 6 BOX 76' EXTENDED M 6 ROUND BASE EXTENSIONS GATE VALVE AND BOXES SHALL K- TYLER SERIES MEL 6060 NOTES, MUELLER MEL M-10357 OR zzzz ALL RELY INCLUDING T-11311.7S APPROVED EQUIN-4- SHALL BE COR-BLUE. OPERATING R13D EXTENSION SHALL RE INST n 01# ALL GATE VALVES DEEPER TWA 91. PIPE To SLIDE DO" THE BOX ABOVE RETAIL. ,V, ADAPTER AS MANUFACTURED BY GATE VALVE AND BOX SHALL BE ADAPTOR INC. OR > STRAI , ALLOWING A 4' PVC APPROVED EDUAL SEE AIM OVER THE GATE OPERATDIG NUT. MIDDLE SEC7ION V 4 :I :3/4 ALVES SHALL . .... 1 1/4 Ir CONCRETE BLEICX�K VIWVEDGE TYPE CUNFORMONG TO NO. 6 ROUND BASE AVVA C509-80 STANDARDS. C1 OF EDINA INA REVISED I STANDARD ENGINEERING ,.. PLATE & PUBLIC GATE VALVE AND BOX 04-05 WORKS 105 DEPTS. VARIABLE I. TO v SECTION 9• 1__ ---I 2, X I OPENING ISLE ADJ67IIG RUGS AS WITH ADAISTOG RUGS NO CAS ASSEMBLY. WHEN HORIZ AL ADASTWHIS ARE REOLORED, CONCRETE ADJUSTING RINGS MAY BE USM MORTAR BETWEEN CASTING, CONCRETE ADJUSTZ RINGS, AND STRUCTUMI, HIM I AND MAX k a HEiGHT FOR CONCRETE ADJUSTMENT Rod= (MON-SHRINKING GROUT RECLX EXTERNAL SEAL SMALL BE DIS7ALLED IN CONJUNCTION WITH ADJUSTING RINGS AND CASTING ASSEMBLY. CONCRETE COLLAR 70 ENCASE CASTM AND RDIGS CURB CONCRETE COLLAR. USED FR F CC CONCRETE SLA& (SEE � JXX STANDARD PLATE ___-�.E STEPS, NEENAH RIINJ OR APPROVED EQUAL. 16' Of- J31WS BEY M PRECAST SECTIONS SHALL USE D-RING RUBBER GASKETS COSDRHOG 70 ASTH C"3. SLOPE BEMCHE Z' PER root xwy CRY OF EDINA D' STANDARD TANDARD ENGINEERING TYPE "CC" CATCH BASIN- LATE & PUBLIC 04-05 WORKS MANHOLE DEPTS. I. -, A- PRECAST RE ORCED _ V VARL HOPE ADJUSTING RINGS AS REQUIRED (HIM Z-e, MAX 5-r MANHOLE SE TION. HEIGHTL BUTYL IFAILANIT SHALL BE APPLIED BETWEEN CONFORMING TO ASIA C471L EACH HOPE ADJUSTING Ron 6 CONCRETE , 1 REIM BASE. EXTERNAL SEAL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON CON.IUNCTUCIN —MECHAMICALI COMPACTED Ili 4' GRANLLAR HATERIAL FOR VITA AAASnNG RINGS AND LEVELING OWDCJ7 31492D ORDINARY COMPACTIOND, xwy CRY OF EDINA D' STANDARD TANDARD ENGINEERING TYPE "CC" CATCH BASIN- LATE & PUBLIC 04-05 WORKS MANHOLE DEPTS. V) V) cy (nzW V) V) L V) OJ 9 Ld Li n M LJ 04 A-Z a ILI O LJL mw z z 0 py n °cC, -5 ' I Cr i J .t• 1 _j TOE O 17 DEED E - C, wz 1 R O cc SHEET NUMBER REV. C. 9. 01 A MFRA FILE 1 15306 -V- _ V VARL HOPE ADJUSTING RINGS AS REQUIRED (HIM Z-e, MAX 5-r HEIGHTL BUTYL IFAILANIT SHALL BE APPLIED BETWEEN EACH HOPE ADJUSTING Ron EXTERNAL SEAL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON CON.IUNCTUCIN Ili VITA AAASnNG RINGS AND CASTING ASSEMBLY. WHEN HORIZONTAL ADJUSTMENTS ARE REQUIRED ADJUSTING RINGS MY BE USED MORTAR STEPS BETWEEN CASING, CONCRETE A RINGS. AND STRUCTURE. MIN 7 AND MAX k- CATCHBASIN C&STDIG IN HEIGHT FiR CONCRETE ADJUSTWAT RD" NEENAH R-3067-V. 0431+-SHRUSaM GROUT REQX EXTERNAL SEAL S)*%UL BE INSTALLED IN CONJUNICTIOUN WITH ADJUSTING RDG No CASTDG ASSEMBLY. z CONCRETE COLLAR TO ENCASE CASTING AND RINGS. CURB NIX _X 7 IOIG SHALL BE USED FOR CONCRETE COL AAIL r To z- SECTION 6• REINFORCED N CONCRETE SLAB Y(SEE �DOT STD PL . 40M VARIABLE _ MANHOLE STEPS. NEENAH RIMJ C&R. APPROVED Er E.. 5. JOINTS BETWEEN PRECAST SECTIONS SHALL USE "ING RUBBER GASKE S CONFORMING TO ASTH 0443 . PRECAST REINFORCED MANHOLE SE TOOK. CONFORMING TO ASTH C47EL 24• SUMF: 6• REIIiRCED COCRETE BASE HE CALLY COMPACTED GIMAILAR MATERIAL FOR LEVELING ON/DOT 31492F) CORDIMMY COMPACTION) CITY OF EDINA ENGINEERING TYPE "DD" CATCH REVISED ST PL D ATE & PUBLIC BASIN MANHOLE D4-05 WORKS 235 DEPTS._ w/ SUMP — V) V) cy (nzW V) V) L V) OJ 9 Ld Li n M LJ 04 A-Z a ILI O LJL mw z z 0 py n °cC, -5 ' I Cr i J .t• 1 _j TOE O 17 DEED E - C, wz 1 R O cc SHEET NUMBER REV. C. 9. 01 A MFRA FILE 1 15306 TIE LOST 3 PPE JmITI USE 2 TIE BOLT FAS'TEIOlS PER JIMMY DSTA_LLD AT 60 DEGREES FROM TOP OF PIPE. HAND-PLACED RD'RIW AS SPECIFIED IN MID°T STANDARD SPECS. 2O13AD.B2,CE NO XCD2 ALA206 L BL RIP RAP QUANTITY SMALL BE W ACCORDANCE WITH MU/DOT STIL PL7. 3133 PROVIDE 3 CLIPS TO FASTEN TRASH GUAM TO FLARED EMIL NOT DIP ALV. AFTER FABRICATION. �A .L• ��• �lFi•�� .•1����i��yl�w�i /w ii — •r' ��1� i �)•1�Zi %tom i NOTES, TRASH GUARDS DIS ALLIED IN INLETS IDLY. ON LARGER SIZED OUTLETS, TRASH GUARDS BE INSTALLED EL611 AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CITY MDJE13L 1 181 3/41' Li:alr UNDER FULL LENGTH OF FLARED END SECTION SAND FILTER • sar�Nresr�r� _ ._ •i:.� � ���•.w I• SIDE VIEW SAND FILTER BLANKET ' SFCTION FLARED CI.TY OF EDINA FILTER FAMMUCC Nr & PUBLIC 0174P__* DEPTSS END SECTION WORK COMMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY WITH BOULEVARD SIDEWALK sm oD Imr � BM °� TATM DTRWAY rArn m Mm . r.. VARIABLE (SEE PLND TOP MAY 3/8' R 3' VARIABLE COME PLAN) ;:.y REVISED TRi 6 PUBLIC .. .t' . �... .♦ WORKS SERVICE CONNECTION 300 DEPTS. F TOAP +IN ter. 7 ME WATER MAIN CONCRETE PRIC7( b ^d �� 4 TRNRIIDM m O W Mm DESIGN 8618EM R 3' � •�- •.1 •. na•H iLL1 M6T EmT m MAiAT TRH AT •)j HIM SLOE V4• TBP BIT. MAY 3/0' R 7 'Din MsHM, •, :m wD � • � 4' DR 6' PVC SIR 26 P RaM® V COMMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY WITH SIDEWALK iR OG �D a•rarm Mm To XA rt a HHr r 1rIP0 1 reumrN Mw RAw I g 1 rRr(u H°er°AT MNWMDr [IarLT. T(M6r Fn1ZT Ta MTa AT mtlK aMW ®H J®I( v •An Mm4 s mt rv.r. / s ! .AIWA .p. mtV QR -.Db FIRM "!4 SANITARY SEVER SERVICE RISER SMALL BE BACK AND COMPACTED WITH GRANULAR MATERIAL r HmR® uP pwy� CITY OF EDINA t e t ENGINEERING COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY REVISED STANDARD PLATE & PUBLIC 04_05 WORKS ENTRANCES 400 DEPTS. 301 NOTE ANY CURB STOP LOCATED IN BLACKT13P OR CONCRETE DRIVEWAY OR SIDEWALK "" DE COVERED WITH METER HEX COVER TOM AD O( APPROVED EWRL. ALL WATER SERVICES SMALL BE TYPE K AND A MDL IT 1'. ANY TAP LARGER THAN V SHALL USE A SMITH N" SADDLE TYPE 0313 DA 0372 OI APPROVED EQAL TYPE R COPPER WATER SERVICE MUST BE CONTINUOUS WITH NO JODTFS UNLESS SERVICE IS OVER ADD• LOG SANITARY Am WATER SERVICE LIES SMALL BE INSTALLED IN THE SAE TRENCH WITH 3 FEET IF SEPERATIOL i VARIABLE (SEE PLAN) VARIABLE (SEE PLAID ADJUST CURBSTEP TO r — BELOW FINISHED GRADE CIRH STOP SMALL BE MUELLER elm KINCA I)Lj PATTERN 1 v USE 4' STACK FOR E WITH r CURB STOP. 1' CURB DO( SMALL BE MUELLER H 5154 MINNEAPOLIS i( PATTERN UD APPROVED ERIILL. ALL STOK SMALL BE FLARED FOR BOTH INLET L OUTLET. WATER MAIN LOP FOR SETTLE VAT[R 5[RVICE� CORPORATION STOP SMALL BE COFCRE'Y[ BRIOC- ALUM C° H -15000 13R APPROVED ERIN. WITH MUELLER TREAD FLARE TYPE JaDIT. CD e li 4. Ot 6' PVC 26 6' SAITAY SERVICE VYE AT E_P A 10 O'CLOCK PUDITIOL SEVER SERVICE PIPE. MIN BLUE 1/4' PER R. (2RC SANITARY SEVER R Mwy� CITY OF EDINA VARIABLE (SEE PLND TOP MAY 3/8' R 3' VARIABLE COME PLAN) ENGINEERING e t SEWER AND WATER REVISED .STANDARD PATE 6 PUBLIC B Sr X 04_09 • WORKS SERVICE CONNECTION 300 DEPTS. F TOAP mITRACTmI JODITL `\ 1 6 INAX V4' P[R R. MOPE `PRIVATE EDWARD ROADWAY WALL v4_ L CONCRETE WALK LAYOUT (BEHIND CURB 6 BOULEVARD) ' — r a CLASS 5 OR APPROVED EQUAL 5• TTY. SECTION THRU VALK OI 7 ENTRANCE 1 1 s J, q, • r C L G .4A. J. yM, 4' V y �'. _ - +• NIOEIDa FOR CDSTRICTIEN OF DRIVEWAYS IQ V2 Dl CK —M — Me M PASVtlED J®n 0 u'NCk 4 FILLER MATERLAJ, AASNID M 213 OCLIRED WHEN 2 CONCRETE ARE" ARE PORED SEPARATttYL CURB RETURN, HALF PLAN PERSPECTIVE O'2 V�„ �RmrrS AT" M. (APRBOR.) (WHEN SIDEVALK IS BACK OF CURB) DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT OMATRM DPLACE DRIVEWAY THOODCSS U DL Mmu, LEASTH VARIES O VTTH STQVAK. PAVE TOM BACK OF SOEVAR. Vr L 012 Y FOR RJR. SLA PAID S AS CONCRETE OIVEWAY PAVCMEWT. am "dJ V4, L O'5 SCI STANDARD Putt 523 FOR PED RAP DETAILS SQ PLANS FOR '- - _ r PLRa Nr © FOR CO TRACTDU JOINT A S NEEDED DED TO PR ODUCE J' MPRRRDATRY =AK EPANELS O. AREA v a _ or 64 vR. SECTION A -A QSEE STD RATE 4r FOR COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAYS OTT, RETROFITTED ARIL STRICT MST BE SAVED r MM M FROM IC. APRON AND PATCHED WITH A RANT MIXED, BIIU D`OUS MIXTURE O6TAVCIOII (WALK, 1 &ICU( CURB 6 E](PNLSIOI� NNT M IC 6ACK Q ¢ \ \ \\ 1lY wS .: h. •STREET EDGE -• STRrFT CAGE -• DOG LEG -2 13p. A 3C 05 LE STREET UST BE SAVED r KIN. WT FROM ME. � ET MUST BE SAVED r H(M OUT rR1H1 NEV APRON AND PATCHED WITH A PLANT AXED APRON AND PATCHED VEIN A KNIT MIXED BITIDOOS MIXTURE CURB & GUTTER BITUmna URB & GUTTER A. CITY OF EDINA REVISED STANDARD 4i ENGINEERING PLATE 9 8 PUBLIC CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON a -Ds WORKS AND CONCRETE WALK 410 DEPTS. rL 6' R R VARIABLE (SEE PLND TOP MAY 3/8' R 3' VARIABLE COME PLAN) 6• STEEL FE10E POST _ r B Sr X • 2'2' KER 75 KDL RI F TOAP 7 ME WATER MAIN CONCRETE PRIC7( b ^d STUD DESIGN 8618EM R 3' ELEV. HIM SLOE V4• TBP BIT. MAY 3/0' R 7 PER FT. (ROAD AERE 3/4• PER FT. 4' DR 6' PVC SIR 26 SEVER SCR.YILE f•IPE. NOTE: EXCESSIVE SANITARY SEWER , IO• • J +I SANITARY SERVICE VYE wiQrLDI DEPTH RUST BE REVIEHED TWEE IP AT A 45' Nm APPROVED BT THE ENGIM.rn SANITARY SEVER SERVICE RISER SMALL BE BACK AND COMPACTED WITH GRANULAR MATERIAL Hwy CITY OF EDINA +•A e ENGINEERING SEWER AND WATER SERVICE REVISED STANDARD PLATE & PUBLIC o4 WORKS CONNECTION W/ RISER 301 DEPTS. DESIGN 8618 6' RVr R TOP MAY 3/8' R 3' 6• SLOE 3/4• PER R, _ r • L P BASE 7' 7 ME Ir B' �•I 4. OBICRETE VNx DESIGN 8618EM R 3' TBP BIT. MAY 3/0' R 7 AERE 3/4• PER FT. BASE Imo— 'IB• , IO• • J +I DESIGN MOUNTABLE R'� 1/2 Tlp HIT. MAT V � 4' L 1os• i AR �p ,1 • P vs — 2B' HwyA CITY OF EDINA NG REVISED STANDARD 9 ti ENGINEERI PLATE & PUBLIC CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 04 -05 WORKS 500 DEPTS. 12' v4 4 DI O 200D0 CONCRETE BB NOTE CLASS A � D ER of PIPE COMPACTED BACXFI L 12' MIN 6• Yin C D ` eDC ft/4 BUT NOT LESS B B THAN 6' OF GRANULAR BioKr¢L COMPACTED BAG6ILL PIPE DIAIETER(DN B PIPE DIAKETCR(D) B 36' (BR LESS Be . 24' 36' O! LESS Be 4 24' 4r TO 54' 13 X Bc 4r TO 54' L5 X Dc 60' OR OVER Dc • 36' 60' OR OVER He 4 36' CLASS B CLASS C Hwy CITY OF EDINA REVISED STM/DARD 9 tt ENGINEERING & PUBLIC PIPE BEDDING DETAIL 04-as PLATE WORKS '380 DEPTS. Q Mountable Cone. Curb & Gutter NOTE: Mountable Curb & Gutter to be formed into a 8618 type at catchbosin. Catchbosin Frame & Cover 01-0 PERSPECTIVE M�i 10' Min. Transition 10' Min. Transition Mountable curb &gutter N d Top of curb 9 n 2 No.4 Rebars Desi utter 9 line grade Neeah frame & cover R -3067V with type V grate or approved equal. SECTION A —A CITY OF EDINA REVISED STANDARD ENGINEERING B618 CURB & GUTTER PLATE 8 PUBLIC 04-09 woRKS TRANSITION 505 DEPTS. N f— W 0 O V) 01 N N Z W � N W a N o W Z W o Q. F- N O N C ��b I eshh .0 Q O >< C Ly L O No4 .0 To m L O p O U U Q N N n O v o v a r v nmco E U. IoW c c 0 3 m 2 _rn .20 o�mo o `r cOaN c c gS.oS o u J E o v �v3 o J � to r U ` ° ° O oEE� c° E La N i G a a DI �m c O 'S o m SHEET NWBEB REV, C.9.02 A IORA FIE / 15706 A anol oats v mlmrz sws r m-sarz - moerz 4 r o `"g" 4 r r Mu ,► t� •3 b �� °6 t eaa v "6 t v o rA rwrt rAa L w v r S rr r.. rrwQ r �a�1 r r A-' s r aam PLAN NEW OF PERPENDICULAR RAMP PLAN NEW OF DIAGONAL RAMP or &I% an rn �� —_s r arm r _r T arm ME SECTION 0011(8n 1Mlr P.m RAT. d MI10 Q r- SECTION A -A �� -x a is .) I�,7wA r M rA1N or mu • r • m . R. o oaum � DOME SPAGNC wam Au n,P m nm R.UrT. aa.s -v M nAl® me r i • m l63 1Mw, . -'I. 9d M TIAIm2 ®[ 51RF wlpgtp6 111141 MOi O® tle a.•rras rr .. S or arm nos R.T• slac) (r a0 • Gal lt4n curt) NOTE ELEVATION OF RAMP m soar we M wasewm 14e Oea4rlio An (AnAi Au sun Afm ,nGl Am1m AR Ata� m wrtr wm m srAwuw Ma M sae Alp aw trAlmsw a M lur va r rAe fat u utul rm v mutt arm a mul4 aw wo amn M Mr A1QA wLL R rAm rO A9 mHRIE Wl[ Omlrlw M lwa,a�lm Oa[ A1QA Mal wIL t PAm iml N TrKAnD Oa0 n M salrr[ IooT. m tugs sou MYE IrIN{'.1nn oolaa .ama M on-e MM v llal ea M IMl ams:o A .ao. a4a AIE 1w1 m s usm a 90FlIw1m a 1rA14 r-ol GDIDIn won el malMK OQ IA — mass- an rsinl wm4w. AA9-e r ea Q rot P®G now4 A aaN rAtX v IM,a .' r u mM M Pf7iSmrX ■AIl. A rMTAQ, MT r ■ e ulmaw wu Auer Mmwm m MWArz Kalam M rmFSlww, Me'. lm 6a,N8 60R WeE6 a ono a�ImlClloe Ala[ waam e M Awf 0 PRIX d IMnl. Q MM A Iafa41 m IInT wQ f Wlal iet Tw1 1Q61RW rNYS Nm A T WPO ilm DAL M rm6mml mw=w B ![ aR 1Xrarw M IPnAM AT Sll�f ILVa. Q RAQ M DtirLIN4[ w1mw0 (1wafAlm mES) AT M Mal v arR MY M el[CIAw! M14aMf SY41d 6 A PAIIASf MImIL M aM aWa a xAwl rowan m rtL M aaP. Q AoA 1ealasn trincvrzo 0or: A1aA sou v r r ,sa w oFQIwX v nova wID wIALL mow M nu wsnl (7 r a .• r IR.) v M aam RA1f. llm Y r n 7 r a r r I lala11 a)IE wcA svu aa- m M91W wM M aoPmlr M1c- W 911rA2 M daQ 1wMGnD Dal[ ArFA 9WL • IOUT oR 41ii 1tl,r�Yl.» mO Mll M NYAQIIr ®t7A111 B A MWI mat M a11-e 1wwcAtm Oat AnFA 51MLL R A DAm awl 0lv al M6 aa, TYPIGIlI) wol M AGND]rI 9011A14 6 A llslr m, 000n mm. O- r r ,wa Tal In mamnna J r aunen to nAr a nAac ro4 rnaalr moons w slMlm-m w214 M aw art wlx o1®s .vt, M al¢rw44 Ivmwc 9wa on[/m M Rla II°M FM. 20. 204 .1wy� CRY OF EDINA 9 ~ ENGINEERING PEDESTRIAN RAMP REVISED S� AR 8 PUBLIC FOR THE 01 -05 510 WORKS HANDICAPPED DEPTS. z E N OVERLAP GEOTEXTILE FT. M MAIN. LENGTH POST 5 FABRIC 6 IN. 8. FASTEN AT 8 FT. X. SPACING AT 2 FT. INTERVA WIRE MESH REINFORCEMENT GEOTEXTILE FABRIC. 48" VIDE FABRIC ANCHORAGE a s TRENCH. BACKFILL DIRECTION OF WITH TAMPED FF FLOW NATURAL SOIL r P z i zi 1D s s ww M EXTEND WIRE 4 w 5 FT. MIN. LENGTH POST AT 6 FT. MAX. SPACING STAPLES GEOTEXTILE FABRIC. 36" VIDE FABRIC ANCHORAGE TRENCH. BACKFILL DIRECTION OF VITH TAMPED RUNT FFLOW NATURAL SOIL MESH INTO MIN. m MIN. TRENCH w a HEAVY DUTY PREASSEMBLED PLASTIC ZIP TIES POST LENGTH, 5 FT. MIN. 150 LB. TENSILE ) Fc, T6 FT. MAX. SPACING LOCATED IN T0P 8" DIRECTION OF OTEXTILE FABRIC. 36' WIDTH RUNOFF FLOW 2iw LLL S N w '\ w MACHINE SLICE la IIJ, 8" - 12" DEPTH nl o I PLUS 6" FLAP ) a STANDARD MACHINE SLICED DESIGN GUIDELINES SILT FENCE DETAILS MAXIMUM CONTRIBUTING AREA- 3 ACRES TO PROTECT AREAS FROM SHEET FLOW I SEE SPEC. 3886 ) SILT FENCE DETAIL (SEE MNDOT SPEC. 3886) H W UHF Lu W cy U) ♦n ? W J V � Q � N w a N o w ? W w a U th On ON S°n^ e'ohh .0 N O .0 L O n 0 ° ° o 0 o " noco Drn OW C C O aao oWmm ° u o n m 010 m � c �TOr 7 J SEmo v f9Jm J� C C YJ2 IV O o TOIL m /A, o EEv E m t TD C o O a 0 a a Cs N NUMBER REV. .03 A FIE / IWIN Q U F W W F N 7 Z Lu Q W U Z Ir LL GALLAGHER AVENUE STREETSCAPE A OVERALL SITE PLAN 19 WM gnw r JG r ® ' 1 BOLLARD :F PRECAST CONC. L. 1 �.e a INTERLOCKING PAVIla W (n z W J o U) W fN z I p v� w z W a LLJ w N (TL' O Q U � e g4o� S Z" b o H eehh e�rbn C 'K o k 0 b O O N 4 v 8's ..S a¢6 a _ ono Y Y Q < 3 3 H O O U O 0 L v � C nod o C L m G m U C C p > �� N smote n10 0 _O 0 N O L mJN — C d ..vvL c u 0 =vim; i.OVL � Y O mEE9 0 E m L TO C _ O O S VI Z O g �a a� c e g \ o- �N O \ \ d �2 t 91FFT NUYBER REV. L.1.01 B 16RA i6E / ISJO6 F PRECAST CONC. BOLLARD TYP. L.1.05 J LIMESTONE FACADE RETAINING WALL L.1.05 EXISTING 10' SIDEWALK 0� 1 0 II GAMAGHER AVENUE HARDSCAPE DEATAIL PRECAST CONC. BOLLARD TYP. L.1.05 PRECAST CONC. BOLLARD TYP. 0 EXISTING 10' SIDEWALK i Q I � o U, 0 1 Z i x w . J LIMESTONE FACADE RETAINING WALL L.1.05 A STD. CONC. PAVING L.1.05 TOOLED JOINTS, COLOR: SCOFIELD'LIMESTONE' 5 SI E K M 0 F PRECAST CONC. BOLLARD TYP. L.1.05 FRANCE AVENUE HARDSCAPE DEATAH. D SCALL: 1• . 2W-0• W&AW IR STD. CONC. PAVING TOOLED JOINTS, COLOR: SCOFIELD'LIMESTONE' II'IL -tll MOVING VERY PARKWG CONDO ENTRY SLI ROOF DECK PEDESTAL PAVING SYSTEM SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS A B FRANCE AVENUE FOCAL POINT 1.04 L.1.04 kpBRICK PAVING ON CONC. BRICK TO MATCH ARCHITECTURE PRECAST CONC. BOLLARD TYP. EXISTING 10' SIDEWALK BUS STOP WITH BENCH 6' IDS ALF / MP ' S' IDE AL BUS LOADING / UNLOADING ZONE J LIMESTONE FACADE RETAINING WALL L.1.05 0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET RETAIL STORE '• ��ll�����m�m� ��m ���.= ���1L>•��m����� �ll��- = ;may .eta- iT ummm (,FOCAL POINT FRONT ELEVATION TYPICAL SECTION THROUGH FRANCE AVENUE STREETSCAPE T.O.W. / BUILDING ELEV. = 668 SIDEWALK / RAMP = 864.05 T.O.W. T_O,C. = 860.4 8.01' 5.00' — 4.77'4 2.00' 7.04• 28.32' ---,,RAMP /WALL SECTION - TYPICAL THROUGH FRANCE AVENUE STREETSCAPE LIMESTONE FACADE RETAINING WALL s TOP OF WALL = WITH SIDEWALK GRADE 1 5' WIDE PLANTER 2%. SLOPE T.O.C. = 862.71 l 5.00 FRANCE AVE. 28.97• K__1SECTION A -A' OVAL TURNAROUND FOCAL POINT ELEVATION - TYPICAL SECTION THROUGH FRANCE AVENUE STREETSCAPE WAM ,' - ,e•-d 40' -Q � 12' -0' runmP Pou V1 z O La N U a F o w Z � z W o IA _ F N U d N In Z W I LJ T w Q 0 z z th g C Se � y raw �^ K�ek O N p 4 lO .0 ^ 4LL oo� Y Y Q O 7 i n 0 0 o v 0 v " o� poop m c nout c o c nno m n O O � OOIn r�Vm U T. O �Emo 0 r ` 1 o o m Y O oEE� oyy sps tYS U U a m s' UI O > X o m %m mumm M. L1.041 B FILE f 15X* SEE FLANS FOR FIN15H DRILL t INSTALL 04 (TYP.) GREASED DOWELS INTO EXISTING CONCRETE FULL DEPTH 112' EXPANSION JOINT W/ SEALANT. HOLD EXP. JT. 1' BELOW FINISH GRADE OF PAVEMENT. JOINT FILLER COLOR TO MATCH CONCRETE. CONCRETE PAVEMENT - 3000 -4000 P51 TOOLED CONTROL JOINT 114 OF SLAB THICKNE55 (SITE SPECIFIC) TOOL JOINT 114 OF SLAB. JOINTS TO RECIEVE Il4' RAD. 5AWCUT JOINT 114 OF SLAB 14, THICKNE55 (SITE SPECIFIC) p° 4 1. WATERPROOF 5EALANT TO BE FLUSH — CONCRETE APPLY a CONCRETE HA5 CURED. COLOR TO MATOt CONCRETE. 2. REFER TO 5PECIFICATION5 FOR JOIIIT PLACf?AM 5. FINI5n TO EXTEND TO TOOLED OR 5Aw UT "NT EDGE. 4- SEE ENIARGEMENT5 FOR CONCRETE FlLRSn. CONC, PAVING � SIAI[: 1115 12' TYPICAL ALL DOWELS l \ W C1A55 5 ROAD BA5E. COMPACTED TO 95i 5 PROCTOR 51)6BA5E . ARCLIRECTURAL SURFACING ON TERRACE / &-DING AREA G' THICK LIMESTONE CAP. MORTOR TO CONCRETE WALL WIDE X V DEEP RECESS L ONCRETE PLATER WALL. - 4COLOR: OLOR:5COFIELD YSTEMS INTEGRAL LIMESTONE /5ANDBLA5T FIN15H ' WIDE X I' DEEP RECESS G1DECORATIVE PLANTER WALL SECTION PLAN is 2'- I I' HIGH PRECAST CONCRETE BOLLARD. CONCRETE COLOR: 4 SCOFIELD SYSTEMS INTEGRAL COLOR 'LIMESTONE' W/ SANDBLAST FIN51H. b , - E e 4 ��RECAST CONC. BOLLARD � swc, Nrs L.1 �\ 6' CLA55 5 ROAD 5A5E. COMPACTED TO 95a`F 51D PROCTOR �1BRICK PAVING ON CONCETE D e••. r. N15 STANDARD 4'CONCRETE PAVING FULL DEPTH 112' EXPANSION JOINT, SEE DETAIL 5TD. CONIC. PAVERS tsFOST[ eus AIY raRYeTRx Fv LIy... sTAloAmc fOCQR MMA 0 • 0 1/! (RD YQ W ngo6S Y m 11/Y Laao LRq ®os Roo gIse sLC ®mIAE om mnu q u m m'ACIm ImCGT[ eA4 {LnEIRL eR IC41� L mYALTm 64 OYOIeCf Ti fso IRI) Ya a05YY[ ALOn Posy Lw -Tux ur At Lalw bna (RO Iql mrD1 >q q k� L CRAM W1 K I�Mf Y xA RRAMY liIBOIAZ a CWRS�fY 9fa Wl Q�MC TMO� BAia COTE \l�lO.�lE01 q[L 5 mm Rnoesc ers asoom mar Rw Tsw v¢ a eIO ®Iwu Ys Po omDan uY vmrwTOs roR eAS wtaena Ysaea sa uo ua mrenlst • m Rm mrla LT1116 tv v aoYmAa YY Ym t>0T9G STREET / PARKING LOT ON COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE CONTRASTING CROSSWALK PAVER - BELGARD BERGERAC SERICE F v - ms GIANTRJG AREA 4• LIMESTONE BOULDER TO Be 4 CCH05EN BY LAND5CAPE ° ARCHITECT PRIOR TO R15TALLATION G' MIN CLA55 5 ROAD 5A.5E to �I r1BOULDER BARRICADE TYP. ' st•••.. x15 COLORED AND STAMPED CONCRETE PAVING. COLOR: SCOFIELD INTEGRAL COLOR TJMESTONE' WITH FLAGE5TONE STAMP. SEAL CONIC. WITH REC. SEALER WHEN CURED, 4' DEEP X 5' WIDE. F511 DETAIL A FOR TOOL JOINTS/ EXPANSION AND CONTRACTION JOINTS STRUCTURAL SUBSURFACE (SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR TYPICAL PAVING SECTION) NOTE: 1. LIMESTONE TO BE BUFF FA501A 5TONE TO MATCH 5OLD114G FACADE COLORED CONCRETE BANDING v �•r •o Mrs N W N UHF Q o � w f - w W O N Z w p N as -I �% N Z � LJ W Lu Z J •� + Lp p yhj b Zz 1 1 J O ^ n y w�� C C C b u Q .0 � � o L o Y Y o � m i 'm c L A O O V Q 0 V:5 a000 m = n �t x no`c Siam 3x °� m nno 0 0 � o �xOm C rvoo m E p J �Emo 0 >+ Y U b TOIL O y O �EEv° 2 E L a o s V 1 2 O q� C b s s a a Feb mm C\ Q\ �Olc = Q 0) K ie < m EMIT NUMBER REV. L.1.05 B mm ru III Imm a r/R" to LRq w TIRta� I' -G' LONG X I O- 12' TMP lulnm I IR- (a-RR .0 �e WIDE X G' DEEP TYP. I ' 1r (sR W) Ytt O.mQOt ALYn POOYRO TA1 V Ar OA ' mYe[lm Am6eT[ eA4 5EUCT AND CUT 5TONE FOR TOP TO ENSURt 60mfID b LOO® ONE 50LID 5TOIE 5TRETCHE5 FROM OVE"AHG 10 OVERHANG. SELECT CAP WISH GRADE. I I/2' -2' ¢ 'x(31 STONE FOR 51 O=..E55 AND LRUFCR Tr. BFLC" TOP OF _ `= 'T L I' -G' LONG X I7_ ,- , LRSE5TONE i I O'- 12' WIDE Y G' I ! ® RAU JOnTS? D[Prn FOR DRY5TACF. APFEARANCt, CLEAW +' ...a,.,� DEEP TYP. REMOVE ALL MORTAR FROM FACE -- CLA55 5 ROAD 6ASE OF 5TONE _. _._._. _...i.. .. OMPACTFD 17 VERnAN Ill' AIRSPACE 5UBGRADE �;x; - -�� _ya ��:o. asalea AtYO 1 T m LAP 'Al 0.0 — — is q —) GALVANIZED OR 5TAINlE55 FACADE CLIP. ANCHOR IN CONC. _ - F. our s.r s: Ian x nw aARm tasa.� 1 nRCOm rely RIRI SWnC, aau3 YD StgRx CYmm tuna OR CMU JOINTS. — mum ATO LsJt m5 wr Imstc o°om1 eAaa ___w. ♦ m xloes< vRSem CMU OR POURED IN PLACE NOTE SECTION PLAN a OYmAT oI TtD1 vrs 1 AIx m LLYRI Y¢ ra OIWDR eRO YSgr ibe CONIC. WALL, REINFORCING AND J, KEEP LIMESTONE COURSES rq sAQ Ixrow; asmeoE xa No RA1i mYACRarI � ro N01 mlu Di116 Tq q •Rg0W1[ Ma YM ¢oRYYG _ FOUNDATION BY ENGINEER HORIZONTAL. RAKE MORTAR 314' BACK e. msne>. ma ew 1lelsa '72 ' FOR DRYSTACK APPEARANCE, STREET / PARKING LOT IF ON COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE SECTION PLAN LIMESTONE EDGER r,IINTERLOCKING PAVER - BELGARD MEGA - BERGERAC SERIES r_._'\UMESTONE FACADE RETAINING WALL RAIL- 1115 S("rr. 1115 � SCLLL NIS N W N UHF Q o � w f - w W O N Z w p N as -I �% N Z � LJ W Lu Z J •� + Lp p yhj b Zz 1 1 J O ^ n y w�� C C C b u Q .0 � � o L o Y Y o � m i 'm c L A O O V Q 0 V:5 a000 m = n �t x no`c Siam 3x °� m nno 0 0 � o �xOm C rvoo m E p J �Emo 0 >+ Y U b TOIL O y O �EEv° 2 E L a o s V 1 2 O q� C b s s a a Feb mm C\ Q\ �Olc = Q 0) K ie < m EMIT NUMBER REV. L.1.05 B mm ru III Imm WAU5AU TILE 48' DIA. % 18' HIGH PLANTER WAU5AU TILE 36' DIA- % I& HIGH MODEL I TF4143. COLOR BUFF WITH PLANTER MODEL # TF4 146. COLOR BUFF MODEL f5T FINISH. IRRIGATION WITH BE WITH 5ANDBLA5T PIN15H. IRRIGATION TO BE STUBBED IN THROUGH BOTTOM STUBBED IN THROUGH BOTTOM ENTRANCE. ENTRANCE. PRECAST CONCRETE PLANTER A Rls WAU5AU TILE 72' DIA. % 18' HIGH PLANTER MODEL / TF4143. COLOR BUFF WITH 5ANDBLA5T FIN15H. IRRIGATION TO BE STUBBED IN THROUGH BOTTOM ENTRANCE. ALUMWUMSEARNGSURFAC w AMMENDED TOPSOIL. 5EE 5PEC5 .Il s COMPACTED 5UBGRADE DRY5TACK MANKATO KA507A STONE WALL CLA55 5 ROAD BA5E 1 I I NOTE: —7 1, INSTALL AS PER MANUFACTURERS REC. 2. BENCH LOCATION TO BE VERIFIED IN FIELD IN BUS STOP DRYSTACK LIMESTONE WALL a n d s c a p e f o r fYi s PICKUP AREA C e 401 LAWNDAIF A`/E, PHONE: 800.521.254 XALAMAi00. 6N MM FAX: 269- JBIJISS RILE: Backed ftMh- CONiWO-AXmvum-2HitlA- COMIDEMIALDRAWINGWFORMADON COMA MEDHEREW6MEPROPEMOFIANOSCAPE DESIGN AUSTIN FORMS. NC. WRNDED USE G Un D 70 DESIGN PROFESSIONALS SPECRTING LANDSCAPE PATENT: 0187.960 FORMS. WC.PRODUCTSANDTHEIRDIRECICUENTS. DRAWINGISNDIlOBE CORED OR TILE. 65 8 DISCLOSED 1007HERS -0U1 THE CONSENT OF LANDSCAPE FORMS. INC. DAIS 6 /Bl: s2004 LANDSCAPE FORMS.INC, ALL R4MS RE5EWED. DRAW N BT: mEk H Rrs ALUMINUM BENCH IN CONCRETE 3' -0" 4 3 (\WATER FEATURE L � If13 I S -6" 9" PLANTER E � Nls 16'-6" ELAN _ r R-Pr mesa Pi a WHIT PAaCAN (M.) MOWS RAIA°N FAKH [,IE sANWH r FWII TO PasT- ] III- AT yr TRW TLP w TLD W 3 L NOTC Q HAINIK Nom M iK TIP[ O ARAM W1DeK ro uY OnA DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAD. NmW_ I. sQUWT BOIM AND FIDES OF N= PON TO PIAUNO L IRO M OM WOW OEO NU WGR ND/OR Om T/LS pyNAR OI A EAOm W xMN rAm °TTs 1 ST PLANT ON KMDIS ul m MINE SOIL O TNOWALY W WM.TO BM°alL ML INSTALL PLNN MP ARE WI MCI FL 6 A OI UP II 2' ANNE THE F/dLD CRAM ♦ PINZ PIA K N PIANRD ICE WITH BJLN wn Ap BVIET. y Ir USED), o MOLT. BPCIOLL WOTB AMOWMRLA tY O THE 1O 1/ OF THE B WATT PANE IP mT 1W 1/3 O THE BASKET N M IV iWa I om A L iNC; WImIDIa 6 WAa. RDmE ALL BURLAP ATD .m G NE RoD: A FTRFOYM E 5. PLUMS N) SACKFUL l 0I K" WITH &DOLL �Ja s: L WATER TO SETTLE PANTS AD FILL wom L PACE MAIM WIN N HOURS O M SOJXD MIOWNO OLESS SOIL MXOOE W ®2 MOIL CRJ! ASSD6T OPITONYL BN CWIRACHON ASRILm TALL RESPm�ITY FOR WVNIAWD TRUE N A p um POSITION MR M MRAIDN O IMP CIYM111O POW[, GIN ASSEMBLY- 1r POYPRopa" 01 POYEImEE (m W) 1 -1/r WIN mw KIP) D018L STAR 10 G WIRE ID R -I' ROU SID POSTS Dbw 340 100 Olt (SEE ODROMIE OF GUY ro M610E HIeOOF 1 OIpIBIW OF N LMNS AHD SGIIS T ,NG �AAT MANE WTIH MAITRE nAGGf> INL Nm WIRE r_r sFm6m BARN IUGM _ -rda4' WW STAKE SET A VICE- SINE td ®aW OA[,E -CmTNC GLIO -M%N M 1/2 WOTH O ROOT BAIL -PAMNC SOIL NUDE (SEE SPEL) -UNDISTURBED OR SLiIIID B CON)IrHEOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL �rW�R 1. SCARY 601101 eD 5m G HOE PLOR TO PLANTING a PIOO ND BAG6WL MAIM BTOOLL 951L. 2 lIN fRR RM WOW AIp WCa ND/W W SETTLE PLANTS AND FU OOOO® 7116 Da-m NUT A UAOOL OD HE PANT MS MLUDSWATER 7. WIFE WRIN iW NI[,IIa O 1 m PLANT N umnlBa HONE SOIL N ISTALIADL W0Fm1D IASF a 1HNOOHLY WNPACTO BAOaLL SOIL MIALL PLANT W THE ROar FIRE 6 A a STFFXJFM ro i1DI y SANWW RON MALL AI) PIAIIIID NON. w 10 r ABA[ THE FP®m GAIT. L PACE MAGI NnN 4e L R= PLASTIC. MARL WWD A FIBER WIRNEIR AD =ft WSDE O SBL WASS HOURS O M SOD Mmw MMES E. 1N06TUIE 6 I11C� A D SHVP E M IEC0 FINN R PANG N A OVJtVABE M. THE OMM14A IILef BE $IR 18 vaIGLLT A r InFRYA1 r -' -a= BAN MLM QUAKING ASPEN OR As SPOWWS PILL WON MRO, BACK, FION SIOL CONE. Fpm t. GRACE DO NaWS TAM cordolo 'GreenWm' SOIL NOmXF (SO SIM) 25' a SINW® 51�pM3 @SHRUB k CONTAINER PLILNTLNG DETAIL 2W �MM OVAL ISLAND DETAIL EXISTING PARK ENTRY O 1 H I IANDSCAPR ISGEND KEY B Uw_AL NAME ICOMMON NAME JUM I ROa I DIY. I REMAINS DE000DLIS TREES GAcer taccharum 'Green Mcm ntm GREEN IDUNUN SUGAR MAPLE 2.5' BB 4 Am X tmmonii 'Jeflenned' AURIMN BLAZE MAPLE 2.5' 88 18 Populus t—loWn QUAKING ASPEN 125 CONE. 38 TAM cordolo 'GreenWm' SINE LINDEN 25' BB 14 CONIFEROUS TREES O Piceo gla— dernolo BLACK HILLS SPRUCE 6' M. 25 WNWMENTAL TREES Maine 'Hargaram' HARVEST GOLD CRAB 15' BB 3 OMaTus spring Snout' SPRING SNOW CRAB 1.5' BB 12 Am ginnala 'Embers' AMUR AMPLE j7 BB 7 PLANTING NOTES � 1. ALL PLANTS MUST BE HEALTHY. VIGOROUS MATERIAL. FREE OF PESTS AND DISEASE AID BE CONTAINER CROWN OR BALLED AD OFNICAPPED AS INDICATED IN THE MAW LIST. 2 ALL TREES MUST BE S7RAGHT 7RUNXED AND FULL HEADED AND MEET ALL REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED. 1 THE LANDSCAPE ARCH TEC7 RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT ANY PLANTS WHICH ARE DEEMED W6A715FACTORY BEFORE, DURN4 OR AFTER INSTALLATION. 4, NO SUBSTITUTIONS OF PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS APPROVED N WRITING BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCIRIECT. S ALL PLAN71IG STOCK SHALL CONFORM TO THE 'AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY sTom ANSI -X60, LATEST EDITION. OF TIE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN. INC. AND SHALL CONSTITUTE MINIMUM QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR PLANT MA7FAIALS L EXISTING TREES AND SHIMS TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED TO THE DRIP NNE FROM ALL CONSTRUCTION TRAFM. STORAGE OF MATERIALS ETC. WITH f HT. ORANGE PLASTIC SAFETY FENCING AOEQUATFLY SUPPORTED BY STEEL FEND: POSTS 6' O.C. MAXIMUM SPACING. 7. ALL RANT MATERIALS O M7rFES. SHAPES OF BEDS AND LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROIOYATE. CONTRACTOR SMALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLETE COVERAGE OF ALL PLANTING BEDS AT SPACING SWAN AND ADJUSTED TO CONFORM TO THE EXACT CONDITIONS OF THE SITE. THE ARCHITECT SMALL APPROVE THE STAKING LOCATION OF ALL PLANT MATERALS MOR TO INSTALLATION. RL AL TREES MUST BE PLANTED, MULCHED. AND STAKED AS SHOWN N TIME DETAILS. IL �ALLLL PLANTING AREAS MUST BE COMPLETELY MULCHED AS TR Wml: SHREDDED HARDWOOD wLOV CLEAN AND FREE Of NOXIOUS WEEDS OR OTHER DElE7EtI0U5 MATERIAL. IN ALL MASS PLANTING BEDS AND FOR TREES, UNLESS INDICATED AS ROCK MULOM ON DRAWINGS, SUBMIT SAMPLE TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO DELIVERY ON-STE FOR APPROYAL DEUVER MULCH ON DAY OF INSTALLAT1OL USE 4' FOR TREES, SHRUB BED$ AND r =� W./OIOUND COVER BEDS. UNLESS OTHERWISE 11. THE RAN TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER THE RANT SCHEDULE E D60tEI'ANCIES EXIST THE SPE7PCATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER THE RANTING NOTES AND GENERAL NOTES 12 71E CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL MULCHES AND PLANTING SOIL QUANTITIES 70 COMPLETE THE WORK SHOWN ON THE PLAN. VERIFY ALL QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THE PLANT SCHEDULE 11 LONG—TERM STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR SUPPLIES ON -SIZE WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. M THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP PAVEMENTS, PLANTERS AND BUILDINGS CLEAN AND UNSTAINED. ALL PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE ACCESS TO BE MANTANED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. ALL WASTES SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED FROM THE SITE. ANY PLANT STOCK NOT PLANTED ON DAY OF DELIVERY SHALL BE HEELED N AND WATERED UNTL INSTALLATION. RANTS N07 MAINTAINED N THIS MANNER WALL BE REJECTED. ANY DAMAGE TO ETOSTNG FAOLITYIES SMALL M REPAVED AT THE CONTRACTORS EPENSL 15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING VAIN ALL APPLICABLE CODES REGULATIONS AND PERMITS GOYFMAIG THE WOIL TL LOCATE AND VERIFY ALL U7IU7tM INCLUDING MIGATION LINES WEN THE OWNER FOR FROPRETART UTILITIES AND GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 4S4 -0002 (TWIN CITIES METRO AREA) OR 800 -252 -1166 (GREATER MINNESOTA) 48 HOURS BEFORE INGGNG. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROTECTION AND REPAIR OF ANY DAMAGES TO SAME NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY CONFLICTS TO FACILITATE PLANT RELOCATION. 17. USE AN7F WANT (WIL7PRIi OR APPROVED EOUAL) ON DEC= RAN2 MDVED N LEAF AID FOR EVERGREENS MOVED ANYIIIE APPLY AS PER MAM6ACIURER'S NSIRUCDW ALL EVERGREENS SMALL BESPRAYFD ON THE LATE FALL FOR WINTER PROTECTION DIKING WARRANTY PERIOD. NL PLANTING SOIL FOR TREES, SHRUBS AND GROUND COWt& FERTILE iR1A3LE LOAM CONTAINING A LIBERAL AMOUNT OF HUBRIS AND CAPABLE OF SUSTAIMING VIGOROUS RANT GROWTHL IT SHALL COMPLY WITH UNDOT SPECIFICATION 3877 TYPE B SELECT TOPSOIL MGTIME SHAUL BE FREE FROM NARDPACN SUBSOIL. STONES, CHEM AM NOXIOUS WEEDS. EM SOL MIXTURE SHALL HAVE A PH BETWEEN &I AND 7.8 AND 10 -10-10 FER71JZER AT INE RATE OF 3 POUNDS PER CUBIC YARD. N PLANING BEDS INCORPORATE THIS MIXTURE THROUGOUT THE ENTIRE BED BY ROTCMLIUNG IT INTO THE TOP tr OF SOB. 19 . ALL PLANTS BULL DE GUARANTEED FOR ONE COMPLETE GROWING SEASON (APRIL 1 - NOVEMBER 11. UNLESS o7HERNSE SPECIFIED THE GUARANTEE SHALL COVER 'IIHE FULL WSi OF REPLACEMENT INCLUDING LABOR AND PLANTS 20L CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT LEAST 3 DAYS PRIOR 70 PLANNED DEUVERT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF BEGINNING PLANT INSTALLATION. 21. SEASONS/TIME OF PLANTING NOTE: THE CONTRACTOR MAY ELECT TO PLANT IN OFT - SEASONS ENTIRELY AT HS/HER RISC DECIDUOUS POTTED PLANTS APRIL 1 -JUNE 1; AUG. 21 -NOV. 1 DECIDUOUS Bab APRIL 1 -JUNE 1; AI1G. 21 -HOV, 1 EVERGREEN POTTED PLANTS APRIL 1 -JUNE 1; ALIC. 21 -OCT. 1 EVERGREEN 0 .. APIA 1 -WAY 15; AUG. 21 -SEPT. 15 2L MAN7ENANCE SHALL BEGIN IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH PORTION Or THE WORK IS IN PLACE. PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE PR07ECTED AND MAINTAINED U4471L THE INSTALLATION OF PLANTINGS IS COMPLETE, INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE, AND PLANTING IS ACCEPTED EXCLUSIVE OF THE GUARANTEE. MAINTENANCE SHALL INCLUDE WAGERING, (RAlIVA7N_ MULC39M REMOVAL OF DEAD MATERIALS, RE- SETTING PLANTS TO PROPER GLIDE AND KEEPING PLANTS IN A PLUMB POSTIOII AFTER ACCEPTANCE, THE OWNER SHALL ASSUME MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES. HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTINUE TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR KEEPING THE TREES PLUMB 7HOUGHQUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. 23. ANY RAM MATERIAL WHICH DIES TURNS BROWN. Olt DEFGIME5 (PRIOR TO TOTAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORN() SHALL BE PRokd%Y REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND REPLACED WITH MATH& OF THE SAME SPECIES AND QUANTITY, A SOME AND MEETING ALL PLANT LIST SPECFICAlCNS. 24. WATERING MAINTAIN A WATERING SCHEDULE OWN WILL THOROUGHLY WATER ALL PLANTS ONCE A WED(. IN EXTREMELY HOT, DRY WEATHER WATER MORE OFTEN AS REQUIRED BY INDICATIONS OF HEAT STRESS SUC I AS WILTING LEAVES CHECK MOISTURE UNDER MULCH PRIOR TO WATERING TO DETERMINE NEED. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE THE NECESSARY ARRANGEMENTS FOR WATER 2a CONTRACTOR SHALL REQUEST IN WRITING, A FINAL ACCEPTANCE INSPECTION, 25. SEE SHEET X FOR PROPOSED IRRIGATION SYSTEM. 27. AL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SIDED, ARE TO RECEIVE 4' TOP SOIL, SEED. MULCH, AND WATER UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS OBTAINED. t t 0 40 80 SCALE IN FEET W Q UaF a w V) w w _Nz_W 2 N z W O U ° th HN gyOm eehh th p1^^ C t, N o 4 4 .0 c o W E2 -A O p p Y Y Q Q O s � n 0 V TL S Oc o o O Cl C U Q 0 L O" o� Homo ct o nouC c m ;DD•� m N1oo v o L � Go L t c pTm U J 0 v o o n oEEm a�s Inz - C �a s as 6 8 g m 3 m C �m D > o D BEET NUMBER REM. L1.07 B MM FILE / ISMS �]' Vii• � m _ �f � _ � � \ IPA 11 Still 11 A GALLAGHER AVENUE STREETSCAPE PLANTING PLAN xalc r a ffi-o• . ... . 7 . Soo FRANCE AVENUE STREETSCAPE PLANTING PLAN � Se•. e. 1' � ffi -0' LANDSCAPE LEGEND KIN I-- tuum NAIL SaE Raaf QE/. R[IMIefS 9eN9S BW Busus Wibod NORTHERN CHARM BOXWOOD 03 11 CONT. 21 18. O.C. CR Comm racemoso 'Huryom' HURON DOGWOOD /5 CONE. 24 18' O.C. MD Microbtota decussala RUSSIAN CYPRESS j2 CDNT. 78 18' O.C. y Junipers hori:ordarm Webberr WEBBER JUNIPER 02 CONT. �li 24. O.C. PS P'Inus syNeshb 'Bw—nensia BENFVRONENSIS PINE /7 CDNT. 9 4 SM tiv S DWARF KOREAN L1lAC 15 CONT. 9 TM Tasus s media Taunton' TAUNTON SPREADING YEW 15 CONr. 14 18. O.C. Vr Viburnum tnlobum 'Batty Compact' BAILEY COMPACT AMERICAN CRANBERRfBUSH %2 CDNT. 16 18. O.C. CA . ... . 7 . Soo FRANCE AVENUE STREETSCAPE PLANTING PLAN � Se•. e. 1' � ffi -0' LANDSCAPE LEGEND KIN I-- tuum NAIL SaE Raaf QE/. R[IMIefS 9eN9S BW Busus Wibod NORTHERN CHARM BOXWOOD 03 11 CONT. 21 18. O.C. CR Comm racemoso 'Huryom' HURON DOGWOOD /5 CONE. 24 18' O.C. MD Microbtota decussala RUSSIAN CYPRESS j2 CDNT. 78 18' O.C. JH Junipers hori:ordarm Webberr WEBBER JUNIPER 02 CONT. 15 24. O.C. PS P'Inus syNeshb 'Bw—nensia BENFVRONENSIS PINE /7 CDNT. 9 30' O.C. SM Syringe meyed 'Palibin' DWARF KOREAN L1lAC 15 CONT. 9 TM Tasus s media Taunton' TAUNTON SPREADING YEW 15 CONr. 14 18. O.C. Vr Viburnum tnlobum 'Batty Compact' BAILEY COMPACT AMERICAN CRANBERRfBUSH %2 CDNT. 16 18. O.C. CA Comm alb. 'Siberia.' RED GROUND DOGWOOD 02 CONT. 53 36. O.C. 1 6) i (5.11 J i -• -3 P 0 S'? `c rfYL 2. 0 I t r i,� fr• 6) S cR o; S EltONIIIiiIi r � i TCNW NOVINGjLD_ 1VERY PARKING - LANDSCAPE LEGEND KEY B.f.114rX rN1E 001a1OM NAYS SaF I war ON. I Mum P008013 • GRASSES AS Asrdbe simpricifollo 'Henna Groatlond' HENNIE GRAAFIAND ASIILBE %1 CONE. 141 18. O.C. AN Athyrium niponicum 'P'Ictum' JAPANESE PAINTED FERN #1 CONT. 171 18' O.C. GF Gailk do grondiflor. Tonlore' FANFARE BLANKET FLOWER %1 CONT. 144 18' O.C. G Geranium 'Jolly Bee' JOLLY BEE GERANIUM #1 CONT. 246 24. O.C. GR Geranium 'Roseanne' ROSEANNE GERANIUM /1 CONT. 24 30' O.C. HS Hemerac.1lis 'Slelle d' Oro' STELLA D' ORD DAYULY #1 CONE. 148 18. O.C. HSS Hemerocallis 'Stello Supreme' STELIA SUPREME DAYULY jt CONT. 346 18. O.C. HF Hosto 'Frames' FRANCEE HOSTA 11 CONT. 21 36. O.C. HR Het. 'Royd Standard ROYAL STANDARD HOSTA it CONT. 54 36. O.C. M Wisconthus sinensis 'Purpumscens' MLSCANTH S FLAME GRASS /1 CONT. 35 4. O.C. MS Mmcardhus sinensis 'S1beAedei MLSCANTHUS SILVER FEATHER GRASS 11 CONE. 3B 5' O.C. PT Parthenocissue tricusp'idato BOSTON IVY ±1 CONT. 17 SPACING PER PLAN PA Pennisetum alopecuruidee 'Hameln HAMELN FOUNTAIN GRASS jl CONT. 6 3D- O.C. P Per.vakio awpr it r4 RUSSIAN SAGE it CONT. 16 SPACING PER PLAN SH Spmobahm heterolepis PRAIRIE DROPSEED GRASS #I CONT. 89 24' O.C. 1 20 40 SCALE IN FEET t• ITI� f.11 t•i': -. �. _'".fit• J Q 1-- W O U Q F_ Z to Ow a (nzW w 0 a N W o W rn w a- >_ w U a U M 0 z .13, gaol b y u�hh 0 Nm J °E�e LL 9- h F�w o O elk m Y Y Q � O � � O m m C O o e o 0 0 0 0 a= mna« c n000 n_o L o c p tai N o.ao 0 4 a O L�J Y C iE ^� 3 O >i m O ua _m o O m .L. j Y O m ;EE 9 161 o L TO O w 0 q� i 0 a� S � m m rr� <m SHEET NUMBER REV. L1.08 B WRA Fill / 15306 i A OVAL TURNAROUND PLANTING DETAIL "RAIN GARDEN" a.,.. r . 1o•-v UPPER TERRACE PLANTING DETAIL D1' = lo•-a• D COLONNADE ARC WALL PLANTING DETAIL '� SCA . 1- —0,-C, 7 LANDSCAPE LEGEND IO.I' BOTANICAL NAME COMM NAME SfZE ROOT OTY. REMARKS SHRUBS CA Comus alb. WNrom 'Regnyom' RED GNOME DOGWOOD 05 CONE. - 3' O.C. GRASSES FBB Festuca gldum 'Boulder Blue' BOULDER BLUE FESCUE jt CONT. - XX' O.C. M Mixanthus sinensis 'Purpumnsia FLAME GRASS #1 CONT. 20 30' O.C. Pv Ponicum virgatum 'Shemndmh' SWITCH GRASS #1 CONT. 34 IB' O.C. SH Sporbolus heterok:pu PRMRIE DROPSEED #1 CONT. 83 24' O.C. PERENNIALS A Aster rmvae- angBae 'Purple Dome' (PURPLE DOME) ASTER 01 CONT. - 30' O.C. GF Gallordia grondiflora 'Fanfare' FANFARE BLANKET FLOWER 01 CONT. 62 18' O.C. L Lmtris py- oetachya GRAY FEATHER 11 CONT. 52 18' o.c. NF Nepela ■ faossenir 'Walker Lai WALKERS LOW CATMINT It CANT. 27 24. O.C. R Rudbeckia fulgido 'GoldeWm' BLACKEYED SUSAN /1 CONT. 44 24' O.C. P TrodescontW s 'S..et Kate' SPDERWORT 'BLUE i GOLD' 1 COAT. B 18' O.C. VINES PO Parther —issus quinquefolia ENGLISH NY %1 CONT. 30 AS ON PUN 1��, ® — IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�I ,��IIIII ■� ■ ` . 1 � � • ♦• �■■��1� Ing - - � ■ �: ■ • • lit:;; I:�: :: ►��. �1 �a�1 ��1•'1. ^.�I ���� ��� 1. 1�� . • ►...:� -ice♦ UPPER TERRACE PLANTING DETAIL D1' = lo•-a• D COLONNADE ARC WALL PLANTING DETAIL '� SCA . 1- —0,-C, 7 LANDSCAPE LEGEND IO.I' BOTANICAL NAME COMM NAME SfZE ROOT OTY. REMARKS SHRUBS CA Comus alb. WNrom 'Regnyom' RED GNOME DOGWOOD 05 CONE. - 3' O.C. GRASSES FBB Festuca gldum 'Boulder Blue' BOULDER BLUE FESCUE jt CONT. - XX' O.C. M Mixanthus sinensis 'Purpumnsia FLAME GRASS #1 CONT. 20 30' O.C. Pv Ponicum virgatum 'Shemndmh' SWITCH GRASS #1 CONT. 34 IB' O.C. SH Sporbolus heterok:pu PRMRIE DROPSEED #1 CONT. 83 24' O.C. PERENNIALS A Aster rmvae- angBae 'Purple Dome' (PURPLE DOME) ASTER 01 CONT. - 30' O.C. GF Gallordia grondiflora 'Fanfare' FANFARE BLANKET FLOWER 01 CONT. 62 18' O.C. L Lmtris py- oetachya GRAY FEATHER 11 CONT. 52 18' o.c. NF Nepela ■ faossenir 'Walker Lai WALKERS LOW CATMINT It CANT. 27 24. O.C. R Rudbeckia fulgido 'GoldeWm' BLACKEYED SUSAN /1 CONT. 44 24' O.C. P TrodescontW s 'S..et Kate' SPDERWORT 'BLUE i GOLD' 1 COAT. B 18' O.C. VINES PO Parther —issus quinquefolia ENGLISH NY %1 CONT. 30 AS ON PUN 0 10 20 SCALE IN FEET N J N W w f- o _—) z Lu z U z W M N a O ., W I W Li ° m d U U v z a J ^ h y � b � y eohh .G 'K o a .0 ^ .0 d Q � A W E� Y Y Q Q O 3 3 h O o _ 3 U O L D O O (J 0 oL' Homo nouc o �aS ° � o pmc-. m mo 0 m mo�L mxn v °o IEEE E o t TO C - O O N z g C q� F �n Aa o s a� as o� m, o�.$ m SHEET NUMBER REV. L.1.09 B WRA FILE 115" PLAN KEY x— EXI5TING TREE TO BE REMOVED TREE INVENTORY AND PROPOSED TREE REMOVAL PLAN NOTES: 1. THIS PLAN IS A COMPILATION OF THE FOLLOWING RESOURCES AND WILL BE FIELD VERIFIED AS TO THE EXACT LOCATIONS: 1. THE ORIGINAL BRW LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS 2. SURVEY INFORMATION 3. SITE INVENTORY AND REC. METHODS. 2. ONLY THOSE PLANTINGS BETWEEN THE UPPER PATH AND PROPOSED TREE REMOVAL LINE ARE TO BE REMOVED AS INDICATED ON THE PLAN. PINE 8 8 mr�uars lams ■o uncc smss OComus a aRmmRofo P PAfADA DOLIMOOD , , QPoPuho h h•mubidim O OWIUNG ASPEN g g • A Acer ruwup, R RED YMIE , TRESS 70 HE BEHOVED . lur eorwru ■eE ool■oll ■w[ g1r. xow■a 1 . tf'•�F Pfcao gWuca daeato �1 BIIGK HILI SPRUCE M/ }/ Pkso realnosa NOWAY ��•sr •�+ �i/ � ggam�__ -� � — -- - - , � _ DRIP � *��,��'' �`�'• f � �' 'r,1n ' '-�� : °- .;� mss!' AJ �,� • � �1: nl TIM :iii i:iC. d a . , I � � � v FIR 1� Will \� .■ � � � MLA. °iZ px - ■„jai •`� '•�• �/-. - -��- .A.�►.. ..■S�i.. ■ •, . ME N.— `�•- � ` "���:• �•'�ts�' �,. 1 TREE INVENTORY AND PROPOSED TREE REMOVAL PLAN NOTES: 1. THIS PLAN IS A COMPILATION OF THE FOLLOWING RESOURCES AND WILL BE FIELD VERIFIED AS TO THE EXACT LOCATIONS: 1. THE ORIGINAL BRW LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS 2. SURVEY INFORMATION 3. SITE INVENTORY AND REC. METHODS. 2. ONLY THOSE PLANTINGS BETWEEN THE UPPER PATH AND PROPOSED TREE REMOVAL LINE ARE TO BE REMOVED AS INDICATED ON THE PLAN. z a J N o F— W _UaF W 0 r inzW O M N z D Z W W � W W U � Q CL v C O ^ O N p ^ b .0 Q�ek O .0 W � a� 0 Y Y Q Q O e CC O > Ci e Y p O O O 0 L 9r Oy p C U.p. O.O � O e_Q o.ao 0 r oa p Tom" O J SEmo ca o m v Cj Y O o• o n eEE9 c E VI Z D S E �a a� as :3 66 m � A O \ '� o Barr NUMBER 3. ADDITIONAL PLANTINGS IN THE AREA NOTED ABOVE THAT ARE REMOVED OR DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION ARE TO BE REPLACED. 4 FIELD CONDITIONS MAY ALLOW FOR ADDITIONAL TREE PRESERVATION. 5. NO ALTERATIONS TO OCCUR TO PARKLAND PATHS, 6. DEVELOPER AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO COORDINATE ALL PARKLAND PLANTING AND REMOVAL WITH CITY PARK STAFF. 0 20 40 7. TREES TO BE REMOVED ARE TO BE MADE AVAILABLE TO PARKS DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPLANTING. SCALE IN FEET REV. L.1.10 B 1aRA iLE / 15]06 PINE 8 8 mr�uars lams ■o uncc smss OComus a aRmmRofo P PAfADA DOLIMOOD , , QPoPuho h h•mubidim O OWIUNG ASPEN g g • A Acer ruwup, R RED YMIE , , 3. ADDITIONAL PLANTINGS IN THE AREA NOTED ABOVE THAT ARE REMOVED OR DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION ARE TO BE REPLACED. 4 FIELD CONDITIONS MAY ALLOW FOR ADDITIONAL TREE PRESERVATION. 5. NO ALTERATIONS TO OCCUR TO PARKLAND PATHS, 6. DEVELOPER AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO COORDINATE ALL PARKLAND PLANTING AND REMOVAL WITH CITY PARK STAFF. 0 20 40 7. TREES TO BE REMOVED ARE TO BE MADE AVAILABLE TO PARKS DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPLANTING. SCALE IN FEET REV. L.1.10 B 1aRA iLE / 15]06 ..t..:� �► r y r.< IE.Cif;s'S �!�•� S. O I I �g.:■, p. M�ol . ',■ J _ i_ .�� • had �. it _WixSi e ,�■ �Y6'• �M� • PROPOSED OVERSTORY TREE REPLACEMENT PLAN NOTES: 1. 12 ADDITIONAL 8' SPRUCE TREES OR EQUIVALENT TO BE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE CITY OF EDINA PARKS DEPARTMETN FOR THEIR USE 2. EXISTING IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE RESTORED TO CITY PARKS DEPARTMENT STANDARDS DURING CONSTRUCTION PERIOD AND AFTER PLANTING. LANDSCAPE LBGBND ir 600•rx WK 001.OI1 NNE SCE r1pi Am n+e^In+ RED MAPLE 2.s ( Y/' BeNb nipro RNER BIRCH 8' SPADE 6 SPECIMEN TREE Pogdw tremubides QUAKING ASPEN 1•— BB 13 • ) li6o rordoto 'Greenepire' GREENSPIRE LINDEN 3S- BB III �� casiROla ,R05 th Q Pisa gtauco Oenwta BLACK HILLS SPRUCE 10. BB 12 ® Plnua n�inoeb NORWAY PINE 10' E18 1 O Pi.- syNes4ie SCO7CH PINE 14' DUGS 1 SPECIMEN TREE UMBRELLA FORM 2g i OR11110RK TKO's O AmeloncAkr a glordi0oro AUTUMN BRILLNNCE SFRVICEBERRY ,0 BB 3 NULTISIEII Aulumn Bn4ance 12' SPECIMEN TREE 0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET N UFO a o � w Q w � Z W � � N x � z W a c g�oN yoo� b I yon h eehh C ��ok N° � $4 ms .0 F o tug � 0 0 fps Y Y a a ° � � o n Y o 0006 0 a ma now o cto o.o uc 3 p m w � v o 01ooln w -J Y C YEmo v TOOL O Y II SEED � Ew in Z o 8 a TAb 3 O O 6 f5 m 3 m c � � m SMCET NUMBER REV. L.1.12 B ,0'RA RE I ,5306 0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET N UFO a o � w Q w � Z W � � N x � z W a c g�oN yoo� b I yon h eehh C ��ok N° � $4 ms .0 F o tug � 0 0 fps Y Y a a ° � � o n Y o 0006 0 a ma now o cto o.o uc 3 p m w � v o 01ooln w -J Y C YEmo v TOOL O Y II SEED � Ew in Z o 8 a TAb 3 O O 6 f5 m 3 m c � � m SMCET NUMBER REV. L.1.12 B ,0'RA RE I ,5306 W. n. W. e. no he na m n. n, m n, e, he e, n. e, II, n, n, n, e, n, e, n, n, e, e, e, W. W, n, ;. II, b, e. D, n, n, e, e, b• e. b, b., III n, n, n, n, m e, e :0. e, n n� II. b e: n, 1 b, s� :n n, e n, n, n, b n n, b. n. n. to n. m m no m e. m m m m m e. We no no n( e. to to We Symbol Iii• , m n mL ,•. no ' : po n>',. no ..es .no . m •. be . e. he U. m We We We he We n. m W. e. m no V. be m II� m e. jb m no We he n1 n. so m no m m O . �0 no n, n, n n, b, W. m be m n. Description . no n, :,n, b..' IIo . n..': a.. '8. '" II nb; e, n. n, , o, n, ee no no eo IIo no n, n, II, bb IIo no ee na II, II, e. D. e, n, e, m SINGLE 7800 IIo m m be m p. n. ' e,. e, : e. n, ' n. n. n. m n, n. n, e, n, n, m n. e, e, n, n, e, n n, no m n, n, n, n, m np m m m e, II, m m be to n, n, n, n. 1, 1s 1A n. II, n, b, II, n, n, II, II, n, W. n, n, n, to m b, n, b, m e m m n, la V. I n. n We 1 tow 1060 1. b, 7.. 1. . n. a 1. L 1.. 11 1 b L + • II. 1 NYP –eoll nt-468–VMITI e. n, n, he We m We no be m SINGLE V he n. 0 6 n, m m to to m m m he 111 m m he n. 5000 0.670 D7 fu c I. ►•ii o�� A17 0.0 \ m to to Ile m I n, n, y n n. n. e, s. n. m a--p, We m m 1., 1., Is +s o n, +.• -. L +, 1 t, n( II, m n m n. m m n, b, 0eB m 9se >\ .o n, +. n. m n, e, n, L. m m n n, n. n, a II, 1 1., II m be ee D.e na no I, n, to srn� 1. v� ar• 1y 1, to he n. IIo IIo m We no eo Ile Ile m m no m eo no m m II. n. n. he We m PHOTOMETRICS BY: 1, Mwaal opj*-FJ,, JTH Lighting Alliance 6885 146th St. Paul Minnesota 55124 4 Project: JTH Lighting Alliance Symbol Iii• , Label Amongemenl lumens LLF Description � c + 20 A SINGLE 7800 0.650 1,. m II, II, 4.. D 7800 0.650 NYP –eoll nt-468–VMITI ® 10 R SINGLE 7800 0.570 LRP- 2346- 10011H18P- 0 6 b. +,> 5000 0.670 D7 fu c I. ►•ii o�� 5.3 0.0 \ ufi Ile D, II, r•�i••`o d. , n b, - b.. bo no So IIo be n. WWI b, b. 1.. 1 1.( n. n, n, n, e. T. s. +.. m n n, no no no e. Iii �i••� �•i•••••i ��• n. n. a. D.. Ile I b, b. b., b, no to he n. IIo IIo m We no eo Ile Ile m m no m eo no m m II. n. n. he We m PHOTOMETRICS BY: 1, Mwaal opj*-FJ,, JTH Lighting Alliance 6885 146th St. Paul Minnesota 55124 4 'L . m n. no It m II. to to m n, n. n, n, n, m m m Ile e. n. III IIo no b. IIo ee n II. L. he n. n. om n. Luminalre Schedule Project: JTH Lighting Alliance Symbol Oty Label Amongemenl lumens LLF Description ® 20 A SINGLE 7800 0.650 1,. m II, II, 4.. D 7800 0.650 NYP –eoll nt-468–VMITI ® 10 R SINGLE 7800 0.570 LRP- 2346- 10011H18P- 0 6 b. +,> 5000 0.670 D7 fu c I. 1.17 5.3 0.0 sA Ile D, II, II, d. , n b, b, bo b.. bo no So IIo be n. II, b, b. 1.. 1 1.( n. n, n, n, e. T. s. +.. m n n, no no no e. m m n. n. a. D.. Ile I b, b. b., b, no to no no bo to III h, n, n, b, b, b. n n. n, n, n., m m b. II. Ile II. bo bo to III IIo bo b, n, ems.+ n. b, n. n. n, n, n, n, L. eo n, n, e, n, n, n. II, to n, no no m no 'L . m n. no It m II. to to m n, n. n, n, n, m m m Ile e. n. III IIo no b. IIo ee n II. L. he n. n. om n. Luminalre Schedule Project: JTH Lighting Alliance Symbol Oty Label Amongemenl lumens LLF Description ® 20 A SINGLE 7800 0.650 NTP –PST- 468 –WHITE 1 (� 27 At SINGLE 7800 0.650 NYP –eoll nt-468–VMITI ® 10 R SINGLE 7800 0.570 LRP- 2346- 10011H18P- 0 6 C SINGLE 5000 0.670 D7 fu c I. HP 10 16-1 HPS Numeric Sum—y Project: JTH Lighting Alliance Label CaIcTyye Units Avg Yoe Yin Arg/Yin Moo/min Property Line Illuminance Fe 0.08 1.2 0.0 N.A. I N.A. Cando To– Top -1 nl,minance Fc 1.06 4.0 0.0 N.A NA Terrace –Top gluminance Fe 1.28 4.2 0.0 Grade u –Top Illuminance Fe 1.17 5.3 0.0 130 TEKA I.rge fN.ron Pole 3 .i•9 Nyhavn Post Poles Ingle Nyhavn Post Poles sign. •,x lnyh EPA QUICK REFERENCE CHART: A m ip m ( S t r a i g h t ( 5 R A) 1 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET f Memo rpY.wYq.�r YY�_ ra.ti�Y�NMr+..a r�.P. Nf,v�y1/re Y THE DISTRICT ,�w %*RR Issue #1: Obtain approval from the City Parks department for the proposed modifications to the landscaping on the City's side of the property line along the southern and eastern edge of the site in the Centennial Lake Park THE DISTRICT^ „, ORA 0 r , Tree Replacement Plan f w i bip. AL THE. D1r5TRI�CTp .., Shadow Study Comparison - Summer Solstice: June 21, 2006 Sunrise 5:26 am Sunset 9:03pm Building as designed r r. Allowable building Current Tme di Shadow Study Comparison - Summer Solstice: June 21, 2006 Sunrise 5'.26 am Sunset 903pm Building as designed ' t , Allowable budding ` 12Pm Current Time Tr�E DlbTalc.� �kl M Issue #2: Provide additional summer and winter shadow studies, especially for 6 and 8pm THE DISTRICT Shadow Study Comparison - Summer Solstice: June 21, 2006 Sunrise 5:26 am Sunset 9 03p Building as designed Allowable building loam Current Time THE �DISTRICT gA i V �I 2 Shadow Study Comparison - Summer Solstice: June 21, 2006 Sunrise 5.26 am Sunset 9.03pm Building as designed Allowable building bpm Current Time THE DISTRICT Shadow Study Comparison - Summer Solstice: June 21, 2006 Sunrise 5:26 am Sunset 9:03pm u Ig' Building as designed Allowable building 6pm Current Time THE DISTRICT .t FRA i Shadow Study Comparison - Summer Solstice: June 21, 2006 Sunrise 5.26 am Sunset 9:03pm - P"r,14 00 91 LL + Building as designed } ' r,. Allowable building - a!^ Current Tyne THE D1MS�T1UT. Shadow Study Comparison - Summer Solstice: June 21, 2006 Sunrise 526 am Sunset 9:03pm Building as designed Allowable building 6Pm Current Time fHF�DItiTRICT - ET 1FRA Shadow Study Comparison - Summer Solstice: June 21, 2006 Sunrise 5:26 am Sunset 9:03pm ,e Building as designed I Allowable building Current Time THE DISTRICT ORA 9 Shadow Study Comparison - Summer Solstice: June 21, 2006 Sunrise 5.26 am Sunset 9:03pm Syr Building as designed , s Allowable building T ttpn Current Tin e THE DISTRICT �;-,,A c.+wr.r�rw.m -ev f] Shadow Study Comparison - Summer Solstice: June 21, 2006 Sunrise 5:26 am Sunset 9:03pm Building as designed ., Allowable building 2pm - Current Time THF. DISTRICT Shadow Study Comparison - Summer Solstice: June 21, 2006 Sunnse 5:26 am Sunset 9 03p a Building as designed ' Allowable building 6pm s�. Current Time THmF, DISTRICT 11 ^ %*Rp Shadow Study Comparison - Winter Solstice: December 21, 2006 Sunrise 7:48am Sunset 4.34pm Building as designed I Allowable building Sam - Current Time THE DISTRICT ' ` � Shadow Study Comparison - Summer Solstice: June 21, 2006 Sunrise 5:26 am Sunset 9 03p as *. Building as designed Allowable building 4pm - Current Time THE DISTRICT Shadow Study Comparison - Summer Solstice: June 21, 2006 Sunrise 5:26 am Sunset 9 03p 1 Building as designed Allowable building current Time THE DISTRICT 4 Shadow Study Comparison - Winter Solstice: December 21, 2006 Sunsee 7 48a Sunset 4 34p Building as designed I I • Allowable building `12, Current Tune THE DISTRICT RA Shadow Study Comparison - Winter Solstice: December 21, 2006 Sunrise 7.48am Sunset 4.34pm Building as designed Allowable building 4pm Current Tare THE DISTRICT ORA Shadow Study Comparison - Winter Solstice: December 21, 2006 Sunrise 7 48a Sunset 4:34pm Building as designed Allowable building epm Current rme THE DISTRICT ORA Shadow Study Comparison - Winter Solstice: December 21, 2006 Sunrise 7 48a Sunset 4:34pm Building as designed Allowable building spin / Current Time THE DISTRICT w.w..e...w..r.w...,... .- .._.w. RA Shadow Study Comparison - Winter Solstice: December 21, 2006 Sunrise 7 48a Sunset 4 34p Building as designed Allowable building Sam Current Time THE DISTRICT 5 Shadow Study Comparison - Winter Solstice: December 21, 2006 Sunrise 7:48am Sunset 4:34pm Building as designed r �., Allowable building �A T Cunent Time THE DISTRICT BRA ... Shadow Study Comparison - Winter Solstice: December 21, 2006 Sunrise 7:48am Sunset 4:34pm Building as designed . { Allowable building 2pm Cunent Time TFiF,pDIMSwTRICT FRA -s c Shadow Study Comparison - Winter Solstice: December 21, 2006 Sunrise 7:48am Sunset 4:34pm Building as designed 1"k Allowable building 1 current Time THE DISTRICT RA �„ -, Shadow Study Comparison - Winter Solstice: December 21, 2006 Sunrise 7:48am Sunset 4:34pm Building as designed Allowable building 12pm - Current Time THE DISTRICT #RA Shadow Study Comparison - Winter Solstice: December 21, 2006 Sunrise 7:48am Sunset 4 34p Building as designed Allowable building 4pm, _ Current T'me THE DISTRICT 10 FRA Shadow Study Comparison - Winter Solstice: December 21, 2006 Sunrise 7:48am Sunset 4:34pm Building as designed Allowable building spin _ r Current Time THE DISTRICT 6 Issue #3: Provide a photometric study for the site and amenity deck THF.. DISTRICT THF, DISTRICTRA M.•M.' ....,��,.,m.iwi..e...,.,, . --- Issue #4: Provide a response to the 35' setback requirement along France Avenue South THF. DI�SWTRICT VFRA w Issue #5: Provide clarification of the materials for the condominium balconies and the design of the exterior amenity level for the condominium TuH E DISTRICT SpA 7 Issue #6: Define the materials and design intent of the Pedestrian Plaza Issue #7: Illustrate the connection from the handicap parking spaces to the City Park I (:T ............. Issue #8: Revisit why an additional level of parking was not pursued under the condo lowering the building an additional floor and has a final geotechnical report been completed for the site THE DISTRICT ..... . ...... ORA �- •�»�•- Issue #9: Formally submit the encumbrances plan and any other exhibits that support your request for a variance. THE DISTRICT ...... . ..... RA �N-•�- -- 8 9 FFil y, THE DISTRICT .. 9 IHF DISTRICT L im Orr THE DISTRICT Condominium + Retail + Restaurant 11' D I N A, NM I N N )� S 0 F A Attachment #1 John Keprios, Director Edina Park & Recreation Department 4801 West 5& Street Edina, MN 55424 Office (952) 826 -0430 FAX (952) 826 -0385 Jkeprios @ci.edina.mn.us To: Mayor Hovland and Council. From: John Keprios CC: Kathleen O'Connell, Gordon Hughes Date: May 8, 2006 Re: Meetings with Kathleen O'Connell, MFRA This is to inform you that my staff (Tom Shirley, Manager Edinborough Centennial Lakes Park; and Ted Stephenson, Centennial Lakes Park Horticulturist) and I met with Kathleen O'Connell, Landscape Architect with MFRA, on Wednesday, April 26, at the site; and with all of us again on Friday, May 5, at City Hall. The purpose of the meetings was to review and discuss the detailed landscape plans proposed by MFRA as it affects Centennial Lakes Park. In short, my staff and I are pleased with the proposed landscape plan in all respects. Kathleen was willing to adjust her plan as per my staff's recommendations. As a result, we are satisfied with the proposed species, size, and numbers of park trees to be planted in place of those that are anticipated to be lost as a result of constriction. My staff and I are also supportive of the under -story plantings plan as well. It is understood that the developer will cover all costs associated with plant and tree removals, as well as, all replacement plantings, site restoration, mulch, and irrigation expenses. We are told that there will be no alterations to the park's existing pathways. It is also our understanding that all park pathways will remain open to public use during all phases of constriction. If there are more trees and/or shrubs lost as a result of constriction, the developer has agreed to work closely with me and my staff to an agreeable landscape replacement plan. ' I E" " 'HT ju I S T R I C T Condomin 'lum + Retailb + Restaurant CYPRESS EQUITIES An ALrdluc o(.VitAuh ?[nd Srr Uu r i R !. F A 11111 } } }6 Good Fulton & Farrell Architects McCombs FtanN Boot j - Associates. inc. j Provide additional summer and winter shadow studies, especially for 5 and 7pm THE DISTRICT Condominium inium + Reta'H + Restaurant cc-, CYPRESS E Q U I T I E S FRA C Good Fulton & Farrell Architects nn.�?Nice ,r snuhx� nmd5cwxr. VM camhs Fienk Boos UWGI Its, Inc. Shadow Study Comparison - Summer Solstice: June 21, 2006 Sunrise 5:26 am Sunset 9:03pm Building as designed THE Df-,STRIC Conn m'fnfum + ReTaP + Restaurant Attachment #2 8am I � Allowable building Ile 0 f � . Current Time CYPRESS EQUITIES .in NO mw nlvnubx'h a. ,d itr'— FRA IWOMI" funk goof UWC1 us. ms. CWW UWn &ftffed kchftcb Shadow Study Comparison - Summer Solstice: June 21, 2006 Sunrise 5:26 am Sunset 9:03pm 1000 f 4, w s Building as designed THE DIS,rRICT Condominium + [Retail + Restaurant s i R w \ I / Allowable building 10am - Current Time cc-, CYPRESS EQUITIES An Affdia of SULftach Ilan( Se[V"i _ RA McCOhk Bout lamciattS.:ac. Good Fulton & Farrell Architects Shadow Study Comparison - Summer Solstice: June 21, 2006 Sunrise 5:26 am Sunset 9:03pm 1000* i L" 19!�w Building as designed T H E D I R I cr Condominium + Retai[ + Reitaurant 4 PF k � _� 14 f r � i 12pm - r i Allowable building Current Time CC-" CYPRESS EQUITIES An AO*" of S.Ubadf Un( ScC k- FRA i10 -01nes s�AAN AOOi issociaits nc. 1* va s Good FukDn & Farrell architects -I 14 Shadow Study Comparison - Summer Solstice: June 21, 2006 Sunrise 5;26 am Sunset 9:03pm .::% — - I� low Building as designed TH E DISTRICT Condor infirm + R.etaa[ + Restaurant Allowable building 40 - 2pm - Current Time Qu� CYPRESS EQUITIES FRA nn.l�iune nfk uhuh aeral sen9ca AcCOnoi i �anr Aoat Associates. .nc. J !i 9w. Good Fulton & Farrell Architects Shadow Study Comparison - Summer Solstice: June 21, 2006 Sunrise 5:26 am Sunset 9:03pm /!* - ° _ -- _ . � - Vii` - a t , 49 Building as designed ' Allowable building 4pm - ' i Current Time THE DISTRICT CYPRESS EQUITIES �uEQmUtl SeIm T cc� I ES " FRA Good Flton & Farrell Architects %o n, d i n F u rn + Reta i l + Re -sta 1Ea n f anm -:.Sae loos L^sociates. mc. Shadow Study Comparison - Summer Solstice: June 21, 2006 Sunrise 5:26 am Sunset 9:03pm Mii .a Building as designed THE DIST RICT C-on ominium Retail + restaurant sv IL sift.. Allowable building 6pm - Current Time CYPRESS EQUITIES 4..11f.l MSs —h-h K"W 5etncn A $,-FR ,Ovfts �:80Y O00i Ass C (CS. nc. r- Good Fulton & Farrell architects Shadow Study Comparison - Summer Solstice: June 21, 2006 Sunrise 5:26 am Sunset 9:03pm Building as designed THE D ISrr I Condominium, + Retail + Restaurant ' • Allowable building - 8pm - Current Time CYPRESS EQUITIES FRA �,snQ,u c��rsnw,Yy zrwcxc+;c�. Ne'JMO; `lane AOOI ASSOC ales nC. Good Mon & Farrell Architects Shadow Study Comparison - Winter Solstice: December 21, 2006 Sunrise 7:48am Sunset 4:34pm Building as designed THE DISTRICT ,.- on`iornincum f RetaU + Restaurant ' Allowable building 8am - Current Time ( C� * " CYPRESS EQUITIES A.AJYW neoN5uuhch KcrjYn�:cea 109A X Boos Amclitll, Ipc, Good Fulton & Farrell Architects Shadow Study Comparison - Winter Solstice: December 21, 2006 Sunrise 7:48am Sunset 4:34pm Building as designed THE DISTRICT Condominium + Retail + Restaurant Allowable building 10am - Current Time C-1 CYPRESS EQUITIES An AM11" n1 3—h-n aamt Sere . FRA N XanW Rant flaw �aciatea. one. Good Fulton & Farrell Architects Shadow Study Comparison - Winter Solstice: December 21, 2006 Sunrise 7:48am Sunset 4:34pm Building as designed \ I THE DISTRICT w Allowable building - 12pm - Current Time C', CYPRESS EQUITIES An Atfibar. -N 4su7uh dmd tir��[c� 1FRA McZamlf Funk Now .. • ipOCwtes. Inc. Shadow Study Comparison - Winter Solstice: December 21, 2006 Sunrise 7:48am Sunset 4:34pm iLl Building as designed THE DIS Condominium +(detail + Restaurant ' Allowable building #0 2pm - Current Time CYPRESS EQun,IE:3 FRA do %M11— •11 5mhxh tmd: , c, 10caTV& mc. Good Fulton & Farrell Architects Shadow Study Comparison - Winter Solstice: December 21, 2006 Sunrise 7:48am Sunset 4:34pm Building as designed 'THE DISTRICT Conc ominiurn, + Retaal + Restaurant Allowable building - 4pm - Current Time CE-',, CYPRESS EQUITIES RA AA AMlae of 9nubwh Amd SetWc low., o 'aal 9001 Wan:Ji61, nc, Good Fulton b Farrell Architects Shadow Study Comparison - Winter Solstice: December 21, 2006 Sunrise 7:48am Sunset 4:34pm Building as designed `THE DISTRIC'T + Reatal[ + Restaurant 6pm � Allowable building Current Time ccl� CYPRESS EQUITIES An An4lll<'H' Sa.1hxlt Ue d.1.1fl 1 0 FRAMc A mmates. Inc. Good Fulton & Farrell Architects Shadow Study Comparison - Winter Solstice: December 21,2006 Sunrise 7 :48am Sunset 4:34pm Building as designed THE DBTRICT Condors bilurn + Retail + Restaurant ' Allowable building 00, 8prm - to Current Time CYPRESS EQUITIES ICRF RA ombs i1nnk Roos ssoma1aa. 1". Good Fulton a Farrell Archkecb � JJ_ Provide a photometric stuffy for the site and amenity decd THE DISTRICT Condominium + Retah + Restaurant _ 0� R N CIL Do "OLIN FROM gERS CNAM cc. CYPRESS EQUITIES FRA / Good Fulton & Farrell Architects AMIJZe of U..hxh Rind Sml- IAeCOmbs flank 11001 �sGamles. lne. e. t, r b e. t t / e. t Y r Y t Y r b r r r r r r Y Y r r k Y t r r b Y Y t L i, r r r a Y Y r Y r Y Y b Y b Y Y n b b r� Y Y r Y r Y n r r I r b D ' t Y e r Y r t r Y t W1, D Y r Y Y t r D Y Y a. Y e, Y e e. e. e. e. i e. L. G L it t, a� D !. 1 L. L, C CYPRESS EQUITIES An AfBUatc of :.uubaGS Ret" :mien EXISTING PARKING RAMP THE DISTRICT COPIDn:111 NI! 'All t RETAIL - RE':-)TaURAr;T Edina, Minnesota I RA CRF�amus Fro dr Ihm dssodsks. Mc- i \�f Foot Candies 4- 5 fc 3 -3.9fc 2 -2.9fc I -1.9fc 0.1 - 0.9 fc Attachment 3 Good Fulton & Farrell Architects .,. , -emu ... .•..,�.:- Y r Y I— Y r r t Y Y t Y Y t Ott I RA CRF�amus Fro dr Ihm dssodsks. Mc- i \�f Foot Candies 4- 5 fc 3 -3.9fc 2 -2.9fc I -1.9fc 0.1 - 0.9 fc Attachment 3 Good Fulton & Farrell Architects .,. , -emu ... .•..,�.:- Provide a response to the 35' setback requirement along France Avenue South THE T T Condomin -1 m + Retal[ + Restaurant Cc- CYPREss EQUITIES �n Ali�ilnc M'YSU6atlf anvil .Y[aicra FRAGood Fulton & Farrell Architects YlcCOmCs Flank Roos OZ j- Assoniates. Inc. ' . ALUMINUM CURTAIN WALL STUCCO --------------- ALUMINUM STOREFRONT - o en I�f 1 METAL RAILING -- ALUMINUM GRAPHICS PANEL — - - -- STONE PANE[_ VFNFFR _ CURTAIN WALL WOOD VENEER STUCCO J ao M LuT !+1 ALUMINtM M IR5'r w visa[ [ - STUCC WOOC ALUMII O o T 0 U s CYr^,t.lC d&AICI NA:11iGCD 'OREFRONT mETAL PANEL STONE VENEER C CYPRESS EQUITIES An Afr Uuc or SUub*.b Aug Ser kccA 'THE DISTRICT _ .- _ - 'Edina, Minnesota CeRF RA OMS - ltssrd�x.Inc. FAL PANEL 'AIN WALL - -STUCCO J II �a o� �o HL FI_ J O F V1 it GARAGE ENTRY ALUMINUM STOREFRONT - - -- - -- -- - - STONE VENEER 30 60 Feet Attachment 4 Good Fulton & Farrell Architects 2808 arm Art 214 303 - 5=ld 9>M 300 2.L30i=F. art Ta 32m _80 Provade clarification of the materials .for the condominium balconies and the design of the exterior amenity level for the condominium THE DISTRICT C CYPRESS EQUITIES An AML of5nub.:h Slea[7.WS k- 1 �' R A i Good Fulton & Farrell Architects VICCOMOS flank now -'; lsmajotes. I1M. CE CYPRESS EQUITIES Sn :klTillxte Cl VAUb&C-h Retail SC.+ic.ca THE DISTRICT Id Edina, Minnesota FRA nn:1aMrS f ?3ak ilm • ASSO Mms. FMC. Attachment 5a METAL PANEL ALUMINUM CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM WITH COPPER FINISH ALUMINUM BALCONY DOOR, FINISH TO MATCH ALUMINUM CURTAIN WALL ALUMINUM METAL FRAMING WITH COPPER FINISH PERFORATED METAL PANEL SEALANT TO BE SIMILAR TO COPPER FINISH OF CURTAIN WALL M Far•rort Stet 214303 :500 /T' 40 See 3M 21A 3MM21F. Daam I— '5e' a'wa�f ttrr RI cc CYPRESS EQUITIES An nlriL+1c -h• uaub"'b Retail Smun THE DISTRICT �_ONDONINNIUM + RETAIL + RE; TAUF,7.:` - Edina, Minnesota VmccFRA arrss 'rogl Aaas 4uJC HIM 11C. Attachment 5b Good Fitton & Farrell Architects 2M frrtnnt SOW 211.3031500/7✓ SM 300 211.=3512/F+ O.ftL Tom 75701 . .0— Define the materials and design intent of the Pedestrian Plaza THE DISTRICT Condominium, - d;_ Retafi + Pestaurantt ccl� C; Y P R E S S EQUITIES FRA COO�, Good Fulton $ Farrell Architects An Afrdia of SVuemch nerd 5-4— VicCamlu flank How ! Associates. Inc. iCCC JI ' Illustrate the connection from the handicap parking spaces to the Cady Park THE DISTRICT Condominiu m f RetaP + Aestaurant Cc- C Y P R E s s EQUITIES F � Good Fulton & Farrell Architects An Affllui Mr S(vubu-h anvil Scnicca t WeCOmOS Flank Boot � Asmciates,Inc. C CYPRESS EQUITIES Ail AAWIC of VAuhsch Rct" Servicee THE DISTRICT rONQOMINIUbI + RETAiL -r RESTAURANT Edina, Minnesota C F bmks Frani RA -- �1510C13i33. I:it. Attachment b Good Fulton & Farrell Architects 2M F,+man 3ve nt 3W 150W .1 sr 3w na M ;sv✓F. DOW Ts 7M —rcar IMM THE DISTRICT Condominium + kettall + Restaurant CYPRESS EQUITIES FR A ii Good Fulton & Farrell Architects { ° ,Umw` d smbsch q w 5—k. McCombs Flank pool A=Wates. lam. A Geotechnical Evaluation Report Centennial Lakes Redevelopment - The District Francc Avenue & Gallagher Drive Edina, Minnesota Prepared for Cypress Equities Professional Certification: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that `�pl_w fly Licensed Professional Engineer under �tpk0d<J';�ate of Minnesota. _ 0 N ONL� y y ub4P3P-E Vicetiw nMP�r Engineer License'fVi 4gri %4 29 May 8, 2006 RECEIVED Project BL- 05- 03812C MAY o � 2aos Braun Intertec Corporation 0000, FULTON & FARRELL ARCHITECTS BRAUN I NTE RTEC May 8, 2006 Mr. Brett Witzig Cypress Equities 15601 Dallas Parkway, Suite 400 Addison, TX 75001 Re: Geotechnical Evaluation Report Centennial Lakes Redevelopment - The District France Avenue & Gallagher Drive Edina, Minnesota Dear Mr. Witzig: Braun Intertec Corporation 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 Project BL- 05- 03812C Phone: 952.995.2000 Fax: 952.995.2020 Web: brounintertec.com Attachment #8 We have recently completed additional soil borings for the proposed redevelopment of Centennial Lakes Theatre Parcel, which is proposed to be named, "The District." The purpose of this evaluation is to provide geotechnical information and recommendations for the proposed reconstruction. Our services were provided in general accordance with our proposal, dated April 6, 2006. Background Braun Intertec participated in the reconstruction of the Hedberg gravel /concrete operation, in the city of Edina, that the current theatre resides on. We provided geotechnical evaluation for the theatre development, as discussed in our report, dated March 27, 1989. Four soil borings were performed as part of the theatre development. We also provided construction observations and compaction testing in the earthwork phase of the theatre, as discussed in our report dated, December 6, 1989. The information obtained from these reports has been utilized in preparation of this report. Durir:¢ the mass grading of the site in 1989, the western half of the site was primarily cut with limited fill requir -.d on the east portion of the site where the theatre was constructed. Results During the original evaluation of the theatre site in 2005, a Total of 4 borings were completeu. More recently, an additional 14 borings were completed, numbered ST -104A through ST -117 and ST -119. In summary, the borings typically encountered a thin layer of fill soils overlying glacial soils. The glacial soils consisted primarily of clean sands (SP -SM) mixed with some layers of clay and silty sand. Groundwater was typically encountered 37 to 39 feet below the surface of the borings. The groundwater level appears to be between elevations 817 and 819. Recommendations Retail Building It is our understanding the retail building along France Avenue will extend two to three levels below grade. Based on the soil borings, the primary soils will be poorly graded sand with silt at floor grade. These soils were judged suitable for support of the retail structures, using typical spread footings. For the retail structure, we recommend a soil bearing pressure of 10,000 pounds per square foot (pso be used. Groundwater does not appear to affect the lowest parking level; however, the elevator pit, at elevation 820, will be within 1 to 2 feet of the groundwater. The elevator pit should be waterproofed and designed to resist hydrostatic pressures. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Cypress Equities Project BL- 05- 03812C May 8, 2006 Page 2 Tower Structure and Restaurant It is our understanding that the tower will extend one level below grade, with the restaurant being close to existing grade. Based on these design loads and the anticipated footing elevations, it appears the tower structure and restaurant can be supported on spread footings designed to exert a maximum soil bearing pressure of up to 7,000 pounds per square foot (psf), where column loads are greater than 1,300 kips. Where column loads are under 1,300 kips, we recommended the soil bearing pressure be increased to 9,000 psf. Due to the significant load difference between the tower footprint and adjacent restaurant's, differential settlements will occur between these two differently loaded areas if spread footings are used. Control joints between the structures should be constructed to allow for the differential movement. '?lease. refer to the attachment for more detailed discussion of our anar.•sis of recommendations. � 'e appreciate the opportunity to provide our services for tl:�S report. If you have any questions regarding this report, phase call Mutt Ruble at 952.995.2224, or Ray Euber at 952.995.2260. Sincerely, BRAUN 'NTERTEC CORPORATION Matthew P. Ruble, PE Associate Senior EnRinrer K., , . - ice President - Principal Engineer Attachment: Geotechnical Evaluation Report c: Mr. Scott Bents; Adolfson & Peterson Mr. David Boone; Good Fulton & Farrell Architects (3) Mr. Sean Cullen; McCombs Frank Roos Associates Mr. Nabil Hadawi; Intertech Design Geo Rpt- Centennial Lakes -The District Table of Contents Description Page A. Introduction .................................................................................................. ..............................1 A.1. Project ............................................................................................. ..............................1 A.2. Purpose .................................................... ..............................1 A.3. Scope ........................................................................... ..............................1 A.4. Boring Locations and Elevations ................................................... ............................... l B. Results ........................................................... ..............................2 B.1. Boring Logs .................................................................................... ..............................2 B.2. Soils ................................................................................................ ..............................2 B.2.a. bill Soils ................:............................................................ ..............................2 B.2.b. Glacial Soils ....................................................................... ..............................2 B.3. Groundwater ................................................................:.................. ..............................3 B.4. Other In Situ Test Results ............................................................... ..............................3 B.S. Laboratory Test Results .................................................................. ..............................3 C. Analyses and Recommendations ................................ ................................. ............................3 .. C.1. Proposed Construction .................................................................... ..............................3 C.l.a. Retail Building ................................................................... ..............................3 C.l.b. Condominium Tower and Adjacent Restaurants ............... ..............................4 C. Le. General Site Features ......................................................... ............. ................4 C.2. Building Pad Preparation .................... ........................................ ............................... ...4 C.2.a. Excavation Stability and Temporary Shoring .................... ..............................5 C.2.b. Dewatering and Hydrostatic Pressures ............................. ............................... 5 C.3. Foundations .......................................... ............................... .................. .......................5 C.3.a. Embedment Depths ............................................................ ..............................5 C.3.b. Retail Building Foundations .............................................. ..............................6 C.3.c. Tower/Restaurant Foundations .......................................... ..............................6 CA. Pile Foundations ............................................................................. ..............................6 CA.a. Allowable Pile Load - Carrying Capacity ............................ ..............................7 CA.b. Predicted Pile Length Estimate .......................................... ..............................7 CA.c. Concrete Fill ...................................................................... ..............................8 C.S. Basement Walls ............................................................................. ............................... 8 C.5.a. Drainage Control ......................................... ............................... C.5.b. Exterior Backfill ................................................................ ..............................8 C.5.c. Lateral Loads .................................................................... ............................... 8 C.6. Floor Slabs ...................................................................................... ..............................9 C.6.a. Subgrade .............................................. ............................... .................. ...........9 C.6.b: Vapor Barrier ..................................................................... ..............................9 C.6.c. Subgrade Modulus ............................................................ .............................10 C.7. Exterior Slabs ... ............................... .............................................. .............................10 C.B. Pavements .....................................................:................................ .............................10 C -8 -a. Subgrade .................................................. ............................... .................. .....IO C-8-b. Subgrade Proofroll .......................................................... ............................... 11 C.8.c. Design Sections ................................................................ .............................11 C.B.d. Materials and Compaction .............................................. ............................... 11 C.9. Utilities .......................................................................................... .............................12 C.9.a. Subgrade Stabilization ...................................................... .............................12 C.9-b. Compaction of Backfill .................................................... .............................12 Table of Contents (continued) Description Page g C.9.c. Corrosion Potential ........................................................... .............................12 C.10. General Construction Recommendations ...................................... .............:...............12 C.1 O.a. Selecting Replacement Backfill and Additional Required Fill .....................:12 C.10.b. Placement and Compaction of Backfill and Fill ............... .............................12 C. L O.c. Excavation and Subgrade Observations ........................... .............................13 C.10.d. Materials Testing .............................................................. .............................13 C. 10.e. Cold Weather Precautions ................................................ .............................13 C.11. Driven Pile Construction/Quality Control ..................................... .............................13 C.1 La. Pile Driving System ........................ C.1 l.b. Recommended Test Pile Program .................................... .............................14 C.1 l.c. Production Pile Monitoring .............................................. .............................14 D. Procedures .................................................................................................... .............................15 D.1. Drilling and Sampl ing ................ ................................................ .... .............................15 D.2. Soil Classification .......................................................................... .............................15 D.3. Groundwater Observations ............................................................ .............................15 E. General Recommendations ......................................................................... .............................15 E.1. Basis of Recommendations .........................................................:.. .............................15 E.2. Review of Design .......................................................................... .............................16 E.3. Groundwater Fluctuations ............................................................. .............................16 EA. Use of Report ................................................................................. .............................16 Appendix Soil Boring Logs, ST -101 through ST -117 and ST -119, ST -1 through ST -4 (1989) A. Introduction A.I. Project It is our understanding that Cypress Equities is planning to construct a retail development along France Avenue and a new condominium tower within the approximate footprint of the existing Centennial Lakes Theatre, in Edina, Minnesota. Below the tower, there will be one level of below -grade parking, three levels of above -grade parking, with a condominium tower 14 levels tall. The retail portion along France Avenue will have two to three stories of below -grade parking. A.2. Purpose The purpose of this geotechnical evaluation is to summarize the field and laboratory data performed on the site and provide our recommendations for design and construction. A.3. Scope Our services were provided in general accordance with our proposal, dated April 6, 2006. Our Scope of Services include the following: . • Conducting the locating of underground utilities near the boring locations. Measuring the boring locations using a global positioning system (GPS) instrument, and determining the boring elevations using existing site features as a reference. • Performing 14 standard penetration boring to depths ranging from 10 to 80 feet. • Reviewing previous soil borings perfonned by Braun Ir_crtec. • Submirting a geotechnical evaluation report containing logs of the borings and our g: oi: chnical recommendations for ; ..rthwork, .foundation design, floor slab 3uppoi+, ai_c': other geotechnical recommendations. A.4. Boring Locations and Elevations Boring locations were selected by representatives of Braun Intertec. The borings were selected to compliment the existing borings previously completed on the site in two separate investigations. The boring locations were staked in the field by representative of Braun Intertec using a GPS instrument. The boring elevations were determined by Braun Intertec using existing site features, such as fire hydrant and catch basin elevations. Cypress Equities Project BL- 05- 03812C May 8, 2006 Page 2 B. Results B.I. . Boring Logs Log of Boring sheets indicating the depths and identifications of the various soil strata, penetration resistances, laboratory test data, and groundwater observations are attached. The strata changes were inferred from the changes in the penetration test samples and auger cuttings. The depths shown as changes between the strata are only approximate. The changes are likely transitions and the depths of the changes vary between the borings. G °clogic or:g _:s presented for each stratum on the Log of Borir_g sheets are based on the soil types, L- lov,.,s per foot, and available common knowledge of the depositional history of the site. Because of the complex glacial and post - glacial depositional environments, geologic origins can be difficult to ascertain. A detailed investigation of the geologic history of the site was not performed. The borings from our March 27,1989 and October 21, 2005 geotechnical reports are also included in the appendix of this report for your review. B.2. Soils Soils encountered by the borings consist primarily of two different strata that consist of a thin layer of fill overlying glacial soils. The following sections discuss the strata in more detail. B.2.a. Fill Soils The majority of the soil borings completed across the site encountered bituminous. The bituminous ranged from 3 to 5 inches in thickness and generally overlays some aggregate base. Some of the borings encountered topsoil, which was likely placed as fill from previous grading. Fill was encountered in the eastern portion of the site and was likely placed during the mass grading of the site, in 1989. The fill consisted primarily of granular soils, and was classified as poorly graded sand with silt to silty sands. The fill and possible fill depths ranged from 1 to 9 feet. Based on topographic and site plans provided by MFRA, it appears that a utility line runs in a northwest to southeast direction across the site. It should be anticipated that numerous utility lines are located across the site, feeding existing structures, such as the theatre. These utilities most likely have trenches with varying types of fill soils. B.2.b. Glacial Soils Below bituminous or frll,soils, the glacial soils encountered consisted primarily of granular soils. The granular soils primarily consisted of poorly graded sand and poorly graded sand with silt, with occasional silty sand layers. At depth, a number of the borings encountered layers of clayey sand and sandy lean clay. Cypress Equities Project BL- 05- 03812C May 8, 2006 Page 3 Penetration resistances of the granular glacial soils encountered by the borings ranged from 3 to 32 blows per foot (BPF), indicating the soils had a very loose to dense relative density. The penetration resistances of the cohesive glacial soils encountered varied from 10 to 30 BPF, indicating these soils were rather stiff to very stiff. B.3. Groundwater Based on the boring probes, it appears that the majority of borings encountered groundwater across the site. In general, groundwater was encountered at 37 to 39 feet below grade. Based on these boring probes and observations of soil samples, it appears that groundwater on the site typically ranges from elevations 817 to 819. Fluctuation of groundwater will occur due to seasonal and annual weather ariations. B.4. Other In Situ 'Pest Results Results of our pressuremeter tests are summarized below in Table 1. The limit pressures pertain to soil - bearing capacity, and the modulus values pertain to soil stiffness or compressibility. Table 1. Pressuremeter Test Results Summary Test # Location Test Depth ft Soil Class at Test Depth N60 Value Limit Pressure is Modulus (ts 1 ST -104A 19.5 CL 17 10.5 72 2 ST -104A 27.5 CL 24 24.1 191 3 ST -117 21.5 SP -SM 30 25.1 325 B.5. Laboratory Test Results Moisture content tests and gradations were completed on various samples taken by the borings. These results are indicated in the right -hand column of the boring logs and the grain -size distribution reports are attached to this report. C. Analyses and Recommendations C.1. Proposed Construction C.l.a. Retail Building A retail building will be constructed along the west side of the property adjacent to France Avenue. It is our understanding that two to three below grade levels of parking will be constructed below the retail area. The lower slab of the retail building ranges from an elevation of 825 up to an elevation of 837. Cypress Equities Project BL- 05- 038I2C May 8, 2006 Page 4 The lower floor elevation is located in the east- central portion of the site, with the higher elevation along France Avenue and in the northern portion of the building. It is our understanding that the retail building will have two stories above grade with the first floor elevation near 868. It is our understanding the retail building will have maximum column loads of 900 kips, with bearing walls less than 5 kips per lineal foot. It is our understanding that the retail building will be primarily steel- framed with below -grade walls consisting of cast -in -place concrete. C.I.b. Condominium Tower and Adjacent Restaurants It is our understanding that there will be one level of parking.below the condominium tower, with three above -grade parking levels. Fourteen levels of residential floor space will be placed on top of the parking ramp. Restaurants will be constructed on the south side of the tower and will have ground- supported slabs. The restaurant's slab -on -grade will be near elevation 853, with the tower's lower slab ranging from elevation 845 to 842. For the restaurant portion of the site, we assume maximum column loads will not exceed 500 kips. For the tower, it is our understanding that maximum column loads will approach 2,300 kips. We have also assumed that bearing walls will be less than 5 kips per lineal foot. C.I.c. General Site Features Entrances into this site will come off of Gallagher Drive on the north end of the site. A north -south road will be constructed within the central portion of the site to connect to the adjacent office building to the south. C.2. Building Pad Preparatioi.. Based on the proposed floor elevations, bu-th the retail structure and condominium to--N,,:;:- structures will extend through the existing surface fiil into natural glacial soils. The only exception may be the restaurant next to the tower, where some engineered fill may still be in place from the previous development at proposed floor grade or from the backfill of the new sanitary sewer line. Based on the soil borings, we anticipate the soils at proposed floor grade will be directly suitable for support of the various construction using typical spread footings. However, the in -place fill in the restaurant areas should be further evaluated to determine if the existing fill needs to be removed or re- engineered. The exception is in the tower area, in areas of heavy column loads we recommend additional subcutting of clays below foundations. During construction, we recommend the entire excavation be taken down to bottom -of- footing grade. Where clay soils are encountered at footing grade and where column loads are greater than 1,300 kips, we recommend the clays be subcut to a depth of 7 feet below footing bottom and replaced with on -site clean sands. Due to the heavy column loads, we recommend the sands be compacted to a minimum of 98 percent of the soil's modified Proctor density. It should be anticipated Cypress Equities Project BL- 05- 03812C May 8, 2006 Page 5 that moisture conditioning of the sands will be required to meet these minimum density requirements. The purpose of the subcut and replacement with sand is to aid in controlling the settlement of the heavier foundations. Where column loads are less than 1,300 kips, the clay can likely be left in place. However, further evaluation of the clay at the time of construction is recommended. Based on the borings, we estimate half of the tower area will have clay at, or near, footing grade. C.2.a. Excavation Stability and Temporary Shoring We anticipate that glacial sands will dominate the excavation's sidewalls. Sands are typical Type C soils under Department of Labor and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) guidelines. We therefore recommend sloping excavation back at grades equal or flatter than 1 1/2:1 (horizontal: vertical). Due to the close vicinity of France Avenue, it is likely that portions, if not all, of France Avenue may need some shoring for soil retention. We recommend shoring, if required, be designed using the following lateral pressures. The parameters shown do not include safety factors. These designs should also accommodate additional shoring loads from adjacent structures, vehicles, staging materials, and equipment. Table 2. Estimated Material Parameters for Shoring Design C 2.b. Dewatering and ;Hydrostatic Pressures Based on the soil berm,-:;, we anticipate that the maiority of the buildings will be well above the v✓ater 1s t' "'.c: cl:,vator p' S ... i_'. :eta'.l bu;ld il-ig, that Will e�:i!:e::." cl--. n 2)20. We anticipate groundwater in this area is at about elevation 818. Temporary well points may be required to facilitate the construction of the elevator pits. Also, the elevator pits should be designed for hydrostatic pressures.from groundwater fluctuation.. For design, we anticipate the high groundwater level will be close to elevation 822. The elevator pit could then be designed with relief valves, or permanently waterproofed and the slab designed to resist the hydrostatic pressure. CA Foundations C.3.a. Embedment Depths For frost protection and to avoid bearing capacity failure, footings should be embedded at least 42 inches below the lowest adjacent grade. Interior footings may be placed directly below floor slabs. Perimeter interior footings supporting unheated portions of the buildings or other structures, including: canopies, stoops, or sidewalks, should be embedded at least 5 feet below the lowest exterior grade for frost protection. Unit Weight Friction Angle Cohesion Material c (degrees) c Ka Ko K Glacial Sands 120 35 0 .27 .43 3.7 Intermediate Glacial Clays 125 28 0 .36 .53 2.77 C 2.b. Dewatering and ;Hydrostatic Pressures Based on the soil berm,-:;, we anticipate that the maiority of the buildings will be well above the v✓ater 1s t' "'.c: cl:,vator p' S ... i_'. :eta'.l bu;ld il-ig, that Will e�:i!:e::." cl--. n 2)20. We anticipate groundwater in this area is at about elevation 818. Temporary well points may be required to facilitate the construction of the elevator pits. Also, the elevator pits should be designed for hydrostatic pressures.from groundwater fluctuation.. For design, we anticipate the high groundwater level will be close to elevation 822. The elevator pit could then be designed with relief valves, or permanently waterproofed and the slab designed to resist the hydrostatic pressure. CA Foundations C.3.a. Embedment Depths For frost protection and to avoid bearing capacity failure, footings should be embedded at least 42 inches below the lowest adjacent grade. Interior footings may be placed directly below floor slabs. Perimeter interior footings supporting unheated portions of the buildings or other structures, including: canopies, stoops, or sidewalks, should be embedded at least 5 feet below the lowest exterior grade for frost protection. Cypress Equities Project BL- 05- 03812C May 8, 2006 Page 6 Stoops placed around the perimeter of the building will likely be resting on top of a thick layer of fill. The fill will settle over time due from its own weight and the introduction of moisture. To avoid differential settlement of the stoops, the stoops could be structurally supported by the foundation walls Footings should be stepped down gradually due to the natural tendency of the clean sands to run. Very shallow steps will be needed to prevent raveling of the sands when constructing footings. The footing steps should be at least a 2 (horizontal) to 1 (vertical) slope to prevent raveling. Some adjacent footings are located at significantly different elevations due to difference in floor elevations. For constructability reasons and to provide consistent subgrade support below footings, we reconimend adjacent footing lines and columns should be located outside of a 1 1/2 (horizontal) to 1 (vertical) over sizing area from each ot�,ar. C.3.b. Retail Building Foundations Cased on the soil borings, we recommend the retail foundations consist of typical spread footings. We recommend footings be designed to exert a maximum soil bearing pressure of 10,000 psf. However, minimum column pad dimensions should be 5 1/2 x 5 1/2 feet and strip footings should be at least 2 -feet wide. The bearing pressures provided for both the retail and tower foundations includes a safety factor of 3, in regards to bearing capacity failure. C.3.c. Tower/Restaurant Foundations As in the retail area, we recommend the tower structure and adjacent restaurants be supported on typical spread footings. Where column loads are less than 1,300 kips, we recommend the footings be sized to exert a maximum soil bearing pressure of 9,000 psf. Where column loads exceed 1,300 kips, we recommend that the bearing pressure be reduced to 7,000 psf to control settlement. Due to concerns of controlling settlement in the tower area, we recommend the tower excavation be taken down to bottom -of- footing elevation.. In areas where column loads exceed 1,300 kips, we recommend where clays are encountered at footing grade, they be subcut a minimum of 7 feet below grade or until sands are encountered. Sands would then be used as backfill to control settlement. The bearing pressures provided for both the retail and tower foundations includes a safety factor of 3, in regards to bearing capacity failure. We recommend column footings in the tower and retail area have minimum dimensions of 5 feet by 5 feet and strip footings be at least 2 -feet wide. We should be contracted to review minimum strip footing widths if wall loads exceed 5 kips per lineal foot. C.4. File Foundations As an alternative to the recommended shallow foundation system, an analysis was conducted using 12 3/4 -inch diameter and 16 3/4 -inch closed -end pipe pile foundation. These two sections were analyzed Cypress Equities Project BL- 05- 03812C May 8, 2006 Page 7 because they appear to be the most economical pile sections. We anticipate a minimum of 100 -ton load carrying capacities are needed for the project. If an alternate pile type is proposed, we would be pleased to provide our analysis and opinion as to the suitability of the alternate pile for the project. CA.a. Allowable Pile Load - Carrying Capacity Allowable geotechnical pile capacities (working capacity) are determined by dividing the ultimate axial compressive geotechnical pile capacities by a factor of safety. We recommend using a safety factor of 2.25 for driven pile, provided the level of construction quality control outlined in Section D.3 is used during construction. If an alternate level of quality control is implemented, re- evaluation of the predicted pile lengths and applicable design factor of safety may be required. CA.b. Predicted Pile Length Estimate We used DPdVENto predict the ultimate positive geotechnical axial compressive static capacities of driven piles. DRIVEN is a computer program developed for the Federal Highway Administration to estimate static capacity of driven piles. The following tables summarize the pile length estimates at Borings ST -115 and ST -117 for 12 3/4 -inch and 16 3/4 -inch outside - diameter closed -end pipe piles. Tahle 3. 12 3/4 -inch Pile Li -math Fstimate — Allowable Canacitv 100 -Ton with SF of 2.25 Table 4. 16 3/4 -inch Pile Length Estimate — Allowable Capacity 120 -Ton with SF of 2.25 Existing Assumed Estimated Installed Ground Cut -Off Estimate Pile Length Below Cut -Off ISSST- orin Location Elevation Elevation Toe Elevation ft T -115 Tower 856.1 839 774 65 117 Tower 855.0 839 769 70 Table 4. 16 3/4 -inch Pile Length Estimate — Allowable Capacity 120 -Ton with SF of 2.25 * Care should be taken to not over drive these piles if difflicult driving is encountered. We recommend using piles meeting the requirements of ASTM A 252, Grade 3 Stee!, with a minimum yield strength of 45 kips per square inch (ksi). We also recommend the piles have a minimum wall thickness of 1/4 -inch and have protective points. The protection points should limit the amount of piles damaged during driving. The piles should be driven closed -end with circular plates welded to the toe of the piles. The end plates should have a minimum thickness of 3/4 -inch and a diameter no greater than 1/2 -inch larger than that of the pipe. We recommend driving the piles using a hammer with a manufacturer's energy between 40 and 67 kips per feet for the 12" piles and between 50 and 76 kips per feet for the 16" piles. Existing Assumed Estimated .Installed Ground Cut -Off Estimate Pile Length Below Cut -Off Boring Location Elevation Elevation Toe Elevation ft ST -115 Tower 856.1 839 889 50 ST -117 Tower 855.0 839 1 884 55 * Care should be taken to not over drive these piles if difflicult driving is encountered. We recommend using piles meeting the requirements of ASTM A 252, Grade 3 Stee!, with a minimum yield strength of 45 kips per square inch (ksi). We also recommend the piles have a minimum wall thickness of 1/4 -inch and have protective points. The protection points should limit the amount of piles damaged during driving. The piles should be driven closed -end with circular plates welded to the toe of the piles. The end plates should have a minimum thickness of 3/4 -inch and a diameter no greater than 1/2 -inch larger than that of the pipe. We recommend driving the piles using a hammer with a manufacturer's energy between 40 and 67 kips per feet for the 12" piles and between 50 and 76 kips per feet for the 16" piles. Cypress Equities Project BL- 05- 03812C May 8, 2006 Page 8 CA.c. Concrete Fill We recommend the pipe pile be filled with concrete after cut -off at the design elevation. Concrete fill will increase pile stiffness, structural load - carrying capacity, and aid in reducing corrosion and in maintaining pile strength if partial corrosion occurs. We recommend the concrete have a minimum 28 -day compressive strength of 3,000 pounds per square inch (psi). C.5. Basement Walls C.5.a. Drainage Control We recommend installing sub - drains behind below -grade retaining walls, adjacent to perimeter and depressed (elevator pit) wall footings, below the bottom -of -slab elevation. Preferably, the sub- drains should consist of perforated pipes embedded in washed gravel, which in turn is wrapped in filter fabric. Perforated pipes incased in a filter "sock" and embedded in .washed gravel; however, may also be considered. We recommend routing the sub - drains to a sump pump capable of routing any accumulated groundwater to a storm sewer or other suitable disposal site. General waterproofing of below grade walls surrounding occupied, or potentially occupied areas, is recommended even with the use of free- draining backfill because of the potential cost impacts related to seepage after construction is complete. C.5.b. Exterior Backfill We recommend backfilling any below -grade walls exclusively with the on -site glacial sands, classified as t_ :)orly graded sand (SP) or poorly graded sand with silt (SP -SM). We mecommend a walk - behind compactor be used to compact the backfill placed within about -5 feet of the retaining walls. All backfill should be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of modified Proctor density. Further from the wall, a self - propelled compactor can be used. C.5.c. Lateral Loads We recommend designing below -grade retaining walls to support an equivalent fluid pressure of 50 pounds per square foot per foot of depth (pcf). This value is based on a wet unit backfill weight of 120 pcf, internal friction angle of 35 degrees, and assumed at rest pressure conditions. Resistance to lateral earth pressures will be provided by passive resistance against the retaining wall footings and by sliding resistance along the bottom of the wall footings. We recommend assuming a passive pressure equal to 450 pcf, and a sliding coefficient of 0.45 (sand to concrete). These values do not include safety factors. Cypress Equities Project BL- 05- 03812C May 8, 2006 Page 9 C.6. Floor Slabs C.6.a. Subgrade After the building pad preparation has been completed, we anticipate the floor subgrade will be native sands or compacted granular fill. Backfill in footing and mechanical trenches should be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the modified Proctor maximum dry density. C.6.b. Vapor Barrier Excess transmission of water vapor could cause floor dampness, certain types of floor bonding agents to separate, or mold to form under floor coverings. We recommend placing a vapor retarder or barrier below the floor if coverings or coatings less permeable than concrete wi!l be used, or if moisture is a concern. Current industry recommendations are to place the vapor retarder or barrier directly below the concrete. It is then desirable to take precautions against shrinkage and curling of the floor slab. Industry practice has been to allow burying the vapor retarder or barrier below a layer of sand to reduce curling and shrinkage of the concrete, but this practice often traps water between the slabs and the vapor retarder or barrier, causing problems after a period of months. In any case, we recommend consulting with floor covering manufacturers regarding the appropriate type, use and installation of a vapor retarder or barrier to preserve warranty assurances. To reduce shrinkage and curling processes associated with placing concrete directly on the vapor retarder or barrier, we recommend: • using to largest possible maximum aggregate size and /or coarse aggregat_. • using the lowest practical slump. usi;l_ :i1e lowest r: ;, c-t �o tent to d + r" ..;s�,; ._•:n.,.. n rem uce to :�- �otto^ men ��, . �- °nt;r;ls. • carefully curing the concrete. • optimizing the spacing of control joints. • cutting control joints as soon as practical. We recommend that the vapor barrier be inspected immediately before the concrete is placed to identify and patch holes or other potential paths for moisture vapor migration. We also recommended that moisture content and moisture vapor transmission tests be performed after the concrete slabs have cured, but before flooring is installed. Flooring manufacturers typically recommend upper limits for moisture vapor transmission that can be used to set schedules for flooring installation. Cypress Equities Project BL- 05- 03812C May 8, 2006 Page 10 C.6.c. Subgrade Modulus The anticipated floor subgrade is sand. It is our opinion that a modulus of subgrade reaction, k, of 250 pounds per square inch per inch of deflection (pci) may be used to design the floor. If a minimum of 6 inches of compacted crushed gravel road base is placed immediately beneath the floor, it is our opinion that a modulus of 50 pci may be used to design the floor. C.7. Exterior Slabs We anticipate the exterior slabs will be underlain mainly with sands containing variable, but generally low portions of silt and clay. As such, we anticipate the exterior slab subgrades will only be moderately s..scepti��le to frost heave. '��" lile grading to direct surface drair.2ge away from buildings and toyvard a ea, catch basins or other drainage structures help hmit the potential for saturation and subsequent heaving to occur, even limited amounts of ground movement can still be detrimental to slab performance or a nuisance to building employ-ces a-rid guests. If heaving is a concern, one way to help limit its occurrence is to remove frost - susceptible materials present within 5 feet of slab subgrade elevation and replace them with on -site, or imported sand having less than 5 percent of the particles by weight passing a number 200 sieve. On -site materials classified at poorly graded sand (SP) will meet this criterion. Another alternative for reducing frost - related heave is to place at least 2 inches of extruded polystyrene foam insulation below the slabs, and extend it approximately 4 feet beyond the outer edges of the slab. The insulation may have to be buried below a cushion of sand or gravel to protect it during construction. A third alternative is to support the slabs on frost -depth footings, and suspending the slabs at least 4 inches below the underlying subgrade soils to accommodate heaving without it affecting the slabs. C.8. Pavements CX.a. Subgrade Based on the borings, the pavement subgrade is anticipated to be natural granular sands or granular fill. Prior to placing fill or aggregate base, we recommend the Subgrade be surface compacted by a self - .propelled vibratory sheepsfoot compactor. The surface compaction will provide a more uniform subgrade for pavement support. In areas requiring fill, we recommend the fill consist of granular borrow. The granular borrow should have less than 20 percent by weight passing the number 200 sieve in order to be similar to existing on -site sands. Any fill placed should be compacted to at least 95 percent of its maximum modified Proctor density in the upper 3 feet. Fill placed below 3 feet of pavement subgrade elevation should be compacted to at least 90 percent. All fill should be placed with a moisture content within 3 percentage points of optimum except in the upper 3 feet where the moisture content should not exceed 1 percentage point over optimum. Cypress Equities Project BL- 05- 03812C May 8, 2006 Page 11 C.S.b. Subgrade Proofroll Prior to placing pavement materials, we recommend that pavement subgrades be proofrolled with a loaded dump truck or other heavy vehicle. The proofroll will help detect areas of loose or soft subgrade materials that require additional compaction effort, or removal and replacement with compacted backfill. C.8.c. Design Sections Based on the soil borings, we assume that the pavement subgrade will consists primarily of poorly graded sand to silty sand. We are recommending a light duty (automobile pavement) section that includes at least 3 inches of bituminous and 6 inches of Class 5 aggregate base, and a heavy -duty section that includes at least 4 inches of bituminous and 8 inches of Class 5 aggregate base. For rigid pavement design, we recommend 6 inches of concrete over 6 inches of Class 5 aggregate base in light duty areas, and 7 inches of concrete over 6 inches of Class 5 aggregate base in heavy -du—,y areas. These pavement designs are based on the application of up to 100,000 ESALs in light -duty areas, and up to 200,000 ESALs in heavy -duty areas, over a performance life of 20 years. The performance life is defined as the period of time during which overlay or reconstruction is required; the actual life will vary based on the variation of weather conditions, pavement maintenance, and variations in actual versus assumed traffic loads. C.8.d. Materials and Compaction We recommend specifying aggregate base meeting the requirements of Mn/DOT Specification 3138 for Class 5. We recommend a bituminous base course meeting the requirements of Mn/DOT Specificatoins 2350, Type MV, Gradation Number 2, with a PG 64 -28 performance graded asphalt cement designation. We recommend a wear course meeting the requirements of Mn/DOT Specification 2350, Type MV, Gradation Number 3, with a P 64 -28 performance graded asphalt cement designation. PG 64 -28 is recommended over PG 64 -22 to help limit cold weather cracking. We recommend compacting Class 5 to at least 95 percent of its maximum Modified Proctor dry density. We recommend compacting the bituminous to at least 91.5 percent of the maximum specific gravity. We recommend using concrete cement meeting the requirements of ASTM C 150. We also recommend 6 to 7 percent entrained air for exposed concrete to help resist freeze /thaw deterioration. We recommend a water /cement ratio of 0.50 or less for exposed concrete, and a water /cement ratio of 0.45 or less for concrete exposed to de- icers. Cypress Equities Project BL- 05- 03812C May 8, 2006 Page 12 C.9. Utilities C.9.a. Subgrade Stabilization Based on the soil borings, we anticipate granular soils will be encountered at invert grade and judged suitable for pipe support. If conditions are encountered where the pipe extended to waterbearing sands or unstable clays, we recommend extending the excavation down at least 1 foot below invert elevation and backfilling with coarse aggregate (I inch minus crushed rock) to provide a platform where the utilities can be placed and backfilled over. C.9.b. Compaction of Backfill All backfill placed over utilities should be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the modified Proctor. Fill placed at paved areas should be compacted to 95 percent of modified Proctor in the upper 3 feet. C.9.c. Corrosion Potential We currently do not anticipate that the predominantly glacial sands present on the site will be highly corrosive to concrete or iron pipe. C.10. General Construction Recommendations C.10.a. Selecting Replacement Backfill and Additional Required Fill As indicated elsewhere herein, on -site materials free of organic soil and debris can be considered for reuse as backfill and fill, though silt- and clay -rich soils will be difficult to compact if wet, or allowed to become wet, or if spread and compacted over wet or marginally stable subgrades. if excavation bottoms are wet or sup merged, we initially recommend backfilling to a height no less than 2 feet above the excavation bottoms or water surface with coarse sand haviag less than 50 percent of the particles by weigh_ passing a number 40 sieve, any' le ss than 5 ,r,ercenr of the narticles passi7a a nur-� er 200 sieve. Note that the on -site sands may be too fine- grained to meet this criterion, and it may therefore be necessary to import sand in this situation. We recommend that imported material required for "dry" excavations or placement over "dry" surfaces consist of sand having less than 20 percent of the material by weight passing a number 200 sieve. C.10.b. Placement and Compaction of Backfill and Fill We recommend placing backfill and fill in loose lifts not exceeding.6 inches. Recommended compaction specifications for this project are summarized below in Table 5. Cypress Equities Project BL- 05- 03812C May 8, 2006 Page 13 Table 5. Compaction Recommendations Summary C.10.c. Excavation and Subgrade Observations We recommend having a geotechnical engineer observe all excavations related to subgrade preparations and footing, slab, and pavement construction. The purpose of the observations is to evaluate the competence of the materials exposed in the excavations, and the adequacy of required excavation oversizing. C.10.d. Materials Testing We recommend density tests be taken in all backfill, and fill placed below footings, slabs, and pavements beside foundation walls and behind retaining walls. We recommend Marshall tests on bituminous mixes to evaluate strength and air voids, and density tests to evaluate compaction. We also recommend slump, air content, and strength tests of Portland cement concrete. C.10.e. Cold Weather Precautions Usite grading and construction is anticipated during cold weather, all snow and ice should be removed e 1 aka N. from cut and .rill areas prior to additional grading. No till s'-:ouid be plac;.,d er: fro._en su:�G�,.. -..s. L...� rrozen sc. should be u;ed as fist. Concrete delivered to the site should meet the temperature requirements of ASTM Test Method C 94. Concrete should not be placed on frozen subgrades. Concrete should be protected from freezing until the necessary strength is attained. Frost should not be permitted to penetrate below footings. C.11. Driven Pile Construction /Quality Control CA La. Pile Driving System We recommend performing a wave equation analysis that models the contractor's proposed pile installation system prior to acceptance. Using an under or over -sized pile driving hammer can be detrimental to the successful installation of piling. The wave equation analysis can estimate the driving stresses and pile penetration resistance associated with the proposed pile- driving hammer and specified pile size for site - specific soil conditions, aiding in the judgment of the proposed system suitability. Relative Compaction, Moisture Content, Modified Proctor Variance from Optimum Reference ASTM D 1586 in ercenta a points Below spread footing subgrade elevations 98% +2 Below slab subgrade elevations 90% +3 Within 3 feet of pavement subgrade i elevations 95% -3 to +1 More than 3 feet below pavement subgrade - elevations 90% +3 Below landscaped surfaces 85% +3 Wall backfill 90% ±3 C.10.c. Excavation and Subgrade Observations We recommend having a geotechnical engineer observe all excavations related to subgrade preparations and footing, slab, and pavement construction. The purpose of the observations is to evaluate the competence of the materials exposed in the excavations, and the adequacy of required excavation oversizing. C.10.d. Materials Testing We recommend density tests be taken in all backfill, and fill placed below footings, slabs, and pavements beside foundation walls and behind retaining walls. We recommend Marshall tests on bituminous mixes to evaluate strength and air voids, and density tests to evaluate compaction. We also recommend slump, air content, and strength tests of Portland cement concrete. C.10.e. Cold Weather Precautions Usite grading and construction is anticipated during cold weather, all snow and ice should be removed e 1 aka N. from cut and .rill areas prior to additional grading. No till s'-:ouid be plac;.,d er: fro._en su:�G�,.. -..s. L...� rrozen sc. should be u;ed as fist. Concrete delivered to the site should meet the temperature requirements of ASTM Test Method C 94. Concrete should not be placed on frozen subgrades. Concrete should be protected from freezing until the necessary strength is attained. Frost should not be permitted to penetrate below footings. C.11. Driven Pile Construction /Quality Control CA La. Pile Driving System We recommend performing a wave equation analysis that models the contractor's proposed pile installation system prior to acceptance. Using an under or over -sized pile driving hammer can be detrimental to the successful installation of piling. The wave equation analysis can estimate the driving stresses and pile penetration resistance associated with the proposed pile- driving hammer and specified pile size for site - specific soil conditions, aiding in the judgment of the proposed system suitability. Cypress Equities Project BL- 05- 03812C May 8, 2006 Page 14 Braun Intertec provides wave equation analysis services, and will gladly discuss wave equation analysis with you at your request. C.11.b. Recommended Test Pile Program We based the working load capacity for the driven pile foundation system on our calculations using the soil conditions present at the boring locations. To more accurately predict actual pile lengths and capacities, we recommend performing a test pile program on at least 4 test piles at the bridge. We recommend dynamically monitoring these test piles using the Case -Goble Pile Driving Analyzer (ASTM Test Method D 4945). Data accumulated from the Pile Driving Analyzer should be used to fo* nlulate a dnving'iength criterion by which the remainder _,f the pile should be driven. We p ovide this service, and will gladly discuss it with you further. During pile instailation, if the penetration resistance to driving or estimated pile capacity does not meet the required value after driving to the anticipated depth, we recommend halting the driving and evaluating that the capacity on re- strike after allowing for soil set -up to occur. If the pile tip is driven below the estimated pile toe elevations, it is possible that the piles could be overdriven and, after soil setup occurs, the pile working loads could be higher than necessary. Additionally, soil layering exists and end- bearing losses could occur if the pile toe is extended below the anticipated depth. C.1I.c. Production Pile Monitoring An experienced engineering technician working under the direct supervision of the project geotechnical engineer should observe the installation of the remaining piles in accordance with Chapter 17, Section 1704.8 of the International Building Code. The engineering technician should document pertinent pile information such as lengths, elevations, and driving resistances, as well as note the driving/length criterion has been achieved for each of the piles for satisfactory bearing. After the files are driven to adequate bearing and cut off at design elevations, we recommend inspecting the piles for damage and plumbness /batter. The geotechnical and structural engineers should review the load- carrying capability of any pile that is damaged during driving, or at an angle outside the plumbness or batter specification. We recommend including contingencies in the project budget for additional piles and additional pile lengths below the predicted pile tip elevations. Cypress Equities Project BL- 05- 03812C May 8, 2006 Page 15 D. Procedures D.I. Drilling and Sampling We performed the penetration test borings on April 11 to 13, 2006, with a truck - mounted core and auger drill equipped with 3 1/4 -inch inside - diameter hollow -stem auger. Sampling for the borings Was conducted in general accordance with ASTM D 1586, "Penetration Test and Split - Barrel Sampling of Soils." We advanced the boreholes with the hollow -stem auger to the desired test depths. A 140 -pound automatic hammer falling 30 inches was then used to drive the standard 2 -inch split - barrel sampler a total penetration of 1 1/2 feet below the tip of the hollow -stem auger. The blows for the last foot of penetration were recorded and are an in ?ex of sciD stre.n.th character istic�. Sar..illcs vvere token at 2 1/2 -foot vertical inter; als to the 10 -foot depth and then at 5 -foot interva'_s t_: the termination depths cf ti7e boa inns. A representative portion of each sample was then sealed in a glass jar capped with a lid. D.2. Soil Classification Our drill crew chief visually and manually classified soils encountered in the borings in general accordance with ASTM D 2488, "Description and Identification of Soils (Visual- Manual Procedure)." A summary of the ASTM classification system is attached. All samples were then returned to our laboratory for review of the field classifications by a geotechnical engineer. Representative samples will remain in our office for a period of 60 days to be available for your examination. DA Groundwater Observations Immediately after taking the final samples in the bottoms of the borings, the holes were probed through the hollow -stem auger to check for the presence of groundwater. Immediately after withdrawal of the auger, the holes were again probed and the depths to water or cave -ins were noted. The borings were then immediately backfilled. The borings were rechecked and backfilled just prior to leaving the site. F. General Recommendations E.I. Basis of Recommendations The analyses and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the soil borings performed at the locations indicated on the attached sketch. Often, variations occur between these borings, the nature and extent of which do not become evident until additional exploration or construction is conducted. A reevaluation of the recommendations in this report should be made after performing on -site observations during construction to note the characteristics of any variations. The Cypress Equities Project BL- 05- 03812C May 8, 2006 Page 16 variations may result in additional foundation costs, and it is. suggested that a contingency be provided for this purpose. We should be retained to perform the observation and testing program for the site preparation phase of this project. This will allow correlation of the soil conditions encountered during construction to the soil borings, and will provide continuity of professional responsibility. E.2. Review of Design This report is based on the design of the proposed structure as related to us for preparation of this report. It is recommended that we be retained to review the geotechnical aspects of the designs and specifications. With the review, we will evaluate whether any changes in design have affected the validity of the recommendations, and whether our recommendations have been correctly interpreted and implemented in the design and specifications. EA Groundwater Fluctuations Water level readings have been made in the borings at the times and under the conditions stated on the boring logs. These data have been reviewed and interpretations made in the text of this report. However, it must be noted that the period of observation was relatively short and that fluctuations in the groundwater level may occur due to rainfall, flooding, irrigation, spring thaw, drainage, seasonal and annual variations and other factors not evident at the time measurements were made and reported herein. Design, drawings and specifications, and construction planning should recognize the possibilities of variations. EA Use of Report is - te"Or` is : t usp. of the Cy pC,�SS Equit�:'s ! :md ti';ctr con.Sultani s t0 use `J dcSian till°. proposed structures described herein and prepare construction documents. The data, analyses and recommendations may not be appropriate for other structures or purposes. We recommend that parties contemplating other structures or purposes contact us. In the absence of our written approval, we make no representation and assume no responsibility to other parties regarding this report. Geo Rpt- Centennial Lakes -The District Appendix BRAUN" INTERTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project BL -05 -03812 BORING: ST -101 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Proposed Residential Tower and Retail Development France Avenue and Gallagher Dr. Edina, Minnesota DRILLER: Scott McLean METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA Autohammer DATE: 9/14/05 SCALE: 1" = 4' Elev. Depth feet feet feet ASTM Description of Materials BPF WL qp MC Tests or Notes 856.5 0.0 Symbol (ASTM D2488 or D2487) tsf tsf % FILL FILL: 3 1/2 inches Bituminous over FILL 3 inches Bituminous over 8 inches Aggregate Base. 854.3 1.0 Benchmark: 855.6 0.9 SP Several benchmarks from the electronic FILL FILL: Poorly raded Sand, fine-grained, with fine Y g Gravel, inclusions of Lean Clay and limestone, brown, medium dense. sketch provided by moist. 7 (Glacial Outwash) McCombs Frank Roos Associates 852.5 4.0 J were used to SP rr ^uOiZi Y GRADED S ,`_NU, fire- grained, with fine � 19 determine the beruig elevati�:;s. Gravel, brown, moist. 4 23 (Possible Fiii) i! 27 I 841.3 14.0 � 850.0 6.5 1 CL An open triangle in the ,,eater level POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to coarse- grained, with 18 4 Gravel at 7 1/2 feet, brovrn, moist, waterbearing 8 (Glacial Till) (WL) column 837.8 immediately on top of underlying Clay layer, loose to 26 indicates the depth medium dense. ': POORLY GRADED SAND, with lenses of Silty Sand, at which Lean Clay, and Sandy Silt, brown, moist to wet, dense. (Glacial Outwash) groundwater was (Glaciofluvium) 9 observed while Approximate Floor Grade drilling. 845.0 11.5 (West Side) 833.3 22.0 29 CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, with Gravel, brown, wet, stiff to J. SILTY SAND, with Gravel and cobbles, reddish brown, very stiff. 16 moist, medium dense. _ 12.6 (Glacial Till) (Glacial Till) 18 23/4 17.0 829.8 ' 839.0 17.5 13 SP =• POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- grained, brown, wet, Water not observed with 24 feet of hollow -stem auger in medium dense. the ground. (Glacial Outwash) j 21 immediately after withdrawing the auger. i Boring immediately backfilled. Approximate Floor I _ Grade Approximate Floor Grade 15 L (East Side) Moist below 22 1/2 feet. Q ^� 16 5-831.0 25.5 ;r END OF BORING. I_ Water observed at 23 1/2 feet with 24 feet of hollow -stem iauger in the ground. - Water observed at 10 1/2 feet immediately after D withdrawing the auger. :J Water observed at 10 1/2 feet at end of day. Boring immediately back-filled. BL-05 -03812 Braun Intertec Corporation ST -101 page 1 of i C c i t i BRAUN'" INTERTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project BL -05 -03812 BORING: ST -102 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Proposed Residential Tower and Retail Development France Avenue and Gallagher Dr. Edina, Minnesota DRILLER: Scott McLean METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA Autohammer DATE: 9/14/05 SCALE: 1" = 4' Elev. Depth feet feet ASTM Description of Materials BPF WL qp Tests or Notes 855.3 0.0 Symbol (ASTM D2488 or D2487) tsf FILL FILL: 3 1/2 inches Bituminous over 854.3 1.0 8 1/2 inches Aggregate Base brown wet. SP POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to medium - grained, with Gravel and cobbles to no Gravel, brown, moist, medium dense. 20 (Glacial Outwash) J f 19 23 27 841.3 14.0 CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, with Gravel, grayish brown, moist, very stiff. 18 4 (Glacial Till) 837.8 17.5 26 SP ': POORLY GRADED SAND, with lenses of Silty Sand, Lean Clay, and Sandy Silt, brown, moist to wet, dense. (Glaciofluvium) Approximate Floor Grade 31 (West Side) 833.3 22.0 29 SM J. SILTY SAND, with Gravel and cobbles, reddish brown, moist, medium dense. _ (Glacial Till) 29 829.8 25.5 END OF BORING. Water not observed with 24 feet of hollow -stem auger in the ground. Water not observed to cave -in depth of 22 feet immediately after withdrawing the auger. i Boring immediately backfilled. Approximate Floor Grade (East Side) 61,40 -U38 12 tiraun tntertec t,orporauon Z,t -ivt page 101 1 d J BRAUN'" INTERTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project BL -05 -03812 BORING: ST -103 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. LOCATION: See attached sketch. Proposed Residential Tower and Retail Development France Avenue and Gallagher Dr. Edina, Minnesota Edina, Minnesota DRILLER: Scott McLean DRILLER: Scott McLean METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA Autohammer DATE: 9/14/05 SCALE: 1" = 4' Elev. Depth feet feet feet ASTM Description of Materials BPF WL qp MC Tests or Notes 853.9 0.0 Symbol (ASTM D2488 or D2487) tsf tsf % SM POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- grained, with pockets of SILTY SAND, organic, black, wet. Lean Clay till, brown, moist, medium dense. (Topsoil) 851.9 2.0 (Glacial Outwash) (continued) 5 SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, brown, moist. SM (Possible Fill) 26 809.9 4. n 847.4 6.5 SP POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- grained, brown, g SP waterbearing, medium dense. POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to medium - grained, SZ with Gravel to no Gravel, brown, moist, loose. 7 (Glacial Outwash) i (Glacial Outwash) 50.5) — — r— E D OF ?30PING. - — - -� Water observed at 45 feet with 49 feet of hollow -stem auger in the ground. 3 Boring immediately backfilled with bentonite grout. 8 c i '• 9 Approximate Floor 839.9 14.0 Grade CL LEAN CLAY with SAND, gray, wet, rather stiff. (Glacial Till) 10 1 16.0 835.9 , 18.0 ll SP A POORLY GRADED SAN fine- grained, with pockets of Lean Clay ti;l, crew;:, moist, medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) 15 15 With layers of Lean Clay at 24 feet. 13 (Glaciofluvium) 17 19 RI: OS -MRIl u1a 1 a-1— �VIJjUIauun ST -103 page 1 of 2 a .0 .0 1 a V BRAUN' I NTE RTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project BL -05 -03812 BORING: ST -103 eont. GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Proposed Residential Tower and Retail Development France Avenue and Gallagher Dr. Edina, Minnesota DRILLER: Scott McLean METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA Autohammer DATE: 9/14/05 SCALE: 1" = 4' Elev. Depth feet feet ASTM Description of Materials BPF WL qp ?AC Tests or Notes 821.9 32.0 Symbol (ASTM D2488 or D2487) tsf % POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- grained, with pockets of Lean Clay till, brown, moist, medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) (continued) 25 26 809.9 44.0 SP POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- grained, brown, waterbearing, medium dense. 25 SZ (Glacial Outwash) 803.4 --� 50.5) — — r— E D OF ?30PING. - — - -� Water observed at 45 feet with 49 feet of hollow -stem auger in the ground. Boring immediately backfilled with bentonite grout. muun uucneu wrpurauon S1 -1U3 page 2 or 2 c F t c i BRAUN=" INTERTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project BL -05 -03812 BORING: ST -104 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Proposed Residential Tower and Retail Development France Avenue and Gallagher Dr. France Avenue and Gallagher Dr. Edina, Minnesota Edina, Minnesota DRILLER: Scott McLean M DRILLER: Scott McLean METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA Autohammer DATE: 9/13/05 SCALE: 1" = 4' Elev. Depth feet f feet feet ASTM Description of Materials BPF WL qp MC Tests or Notes 853.3 0.0 Symbol (ASTM D2488 or D2487) tsf % tsf % 853.0 0.3 SM SANDY LEAN CLAY, with Gravel, brown, wet, very SILTY SAND, slightly organic, dark brown, moist. (Topsoil) FILL stiff. FILL: Poorly Graded Sand with Silt, fine- to 819.3 3 34.0 ( (Glacial Till) (continued) medium - grained, with fine Gravel, brown, moist. SP P POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- grained, brown, moist, : m 21 21 849.3 4.0 (Glacial Outwash) _ I SP POORL Y GI ✓n DLD SAND, fine- to medium - grained, I with fine Gravel to no Gravel, brown, moist, loose to 814.8 3 38.5 i medium dense. SP J J P ` (C facial Out�vash) — waterbearing, loose to medium dense. `— 12 13 L - � 10 6 11 802.8 5 50.5 1 12 Approximate Floor Boring immediately backfilled with bentonite grout. Grade J 13 836.8 16.5 CL LEAN CLAY, with Gravel, gray, wet, stiff. (Glacial Till) 14 21/2 13.6 13 2 1/2 12.5 14 3 12.5 _ 13 13.0 With lenses of Sand at 25 feet. i 14 824.31 29.0 i CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, with Gravel, brown, wet, very stiff. 20 (Glacial Till) BL -05 -03812 Braun lntertecCorporation J1 -lu4 page 1or2 BRAUN" INTERTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project BL-05 -03812 B BORING: ST -104 coat. GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION L LOCATION: See attached sketch. Proposed Residential Tower and Retail Development France Avenue and Gallagher Dr. Edina, Minnesota DRILLER: Scott McLean M METHOD: 3 IA" HSA Autohammer D DATE: 9/13/05 S SCALE: 1" = 4' Elev. D Depth feet f feet A ASTM D Description of Materials B BPF W WL q qp M MC T Tests or Notes 821.3 3 32.0 S Symbol ( (ASTM D2488 or D2487) t tsf % % SANDY LEAN CLAY, with Gravel, brown, wet, very stiff. 819.3 3 34.0 ( (Glacial Till) (continued) SP P POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- grained, brown, moist, : m medium dense. 2 21 (Glacial Outwash) _ I I 814.8 3 38.5 SP J J P POORLY GRADED SAND, fine - grained, brown, waterbearing, loose to medium dense. (Glacial Outwasl:) 1 13 10 11 802.8 5 50.5 1 END OF BORING. Boring immediately backfilled with bentonite grout. J 14 uraun tntertec t- orporauon S1 =104 page 2 of 2 BRAUN." I NTE RTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project BL- 05- 03812C BORING: ST -104A GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Centennial Lakes Redevelopment Centennial Lakes Redevelopment France Avenue and Gallagher Drive Edina, Minnesota DRf LER: Brett Oldenburg METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA Autohammer DATE: 4/12/06 SCALE: 1" = 4' Elev. Depth feet feet ASTM Description of Materials BPF WL MC p200 Tests or Notes 853.3 0.0 Symbol (ASTM D2488 or D2487) % % 857.0 0.8 FILL No samples were taken above 15 feet. Benchmark: Surface elevations SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to SM 11111111111711 obtained by GPS 1. medium- grained, with a trace of Gravel, brown to dark Approximate Floor technoloay. brown, moist. Grade 839.3 14.0 Reference to report (Possible Fill) SC for more details CLAYEY SAND, fine- to medium - grained, with a trace of Gravel, gray, moist, stiff. 17 13 i <` (Glacial Till) i 836.3 17.0 13 11 38 qu = 8,000 pcf SC CLAY ='Y SAND, with Gravoi, gray, moist, r:.ther stiff to very stiff. 9.0 See (Glacial Till) SP `- POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to medium - grained, ��radatioti;Hydromet with a trace of Gravel, brown, dry, loose. 6 Dre zi -net °. Test (Glacial Outwash) at 19 1/2 feet. Limit Pressure = 10 10.5 tsf 17.0 20 Modulus = 72 tsf SP- ; :... POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to 20 S,If ;: 13 medium- grained, with seams of Clavey Sand, brown, qu = 6,600 pcf 8_',;S.8 i 1 ..0 Maoist, medium d .. n ' Pressuremeter Test Glaciai Outwash at 27 1/2 feet. 824.3 29.0 SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine - grained, with Limit Pressure = 24 tsf Modulus = 191 tsf END OF BORING. oraun unenoc t-orporauon S1 -1U4A page 1 of 1 r e i i J �I F .S r a c BRAUN"' I NTE RTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project BL- 05- 03812C BORING: ST -105 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Centennial Lakes Redevelopment France Avenue and Gallagher Drive Edina, Minnesota DRILLER: Brett Oldenburg METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA Autohammer DATE: 4/11/06 SCALE: 1" = 4' Elev. Depth feet feet ASTM Description of Materials BPF WL MC p200 Tests or Note:; 857.8 0.0 Symbol (ASTM D2488 or D2487) % % 857.0 0.8 FILL FILL: 4 inches of Bituminous overlying 5 inches of NAggregate Base. Benchmark: Surface elevations SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to SM obtained by GPS 1. medium- grained, with a trace of Gravel, brown to dark technoloay. brown, moist. Reference to report (Possible Fill) for more details 9. i i i > 848.8 9.0 SP `- POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to medium - grained, i with a trace of Gravel, brown, dry, loose. 6 i (Glacial Outwash) i i i f 10 840.8 17.0 20 SP- ; :... POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to S,If ;: medium- grained, with seams of Clavey Sand, brown, 8_',;S.8 i 1 ..0 Maoist, medium d .. n ' Glaciai Outwash SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine - grained, with SM a trace of Gravel, brown, moist, medium dense. 10 Approximate Floor Grade 836.8 21.0 (Glacial Outwash) SP POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to medium - grained, with Gravel, brown, moist, medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) 12 14 2 4 See Gradation 13 or nc nnoi 15 a t -tv3 page t or z C BRAUN` I NTE RTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project BL- 05- 03812C BORING: ST -105 (cant.) GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. LOCATION: See attached sketch. Centennial Lakes Redevelopment France Avenue and Gallagher Drive France Avenue and Gallagher Drive Edina, Minnesota Edina, Minnesota DRILLER: Brett Oldenburg DRILLER: Brett Oldenburg METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA Autohammer DATE: 4/11/06 SCALE: 1" = 4' Elev. Depth feet feet feet ASTM Description of Materials BPF WL MC p200 Tests or Notes 825.8 32.0 Symbol (ASTM D2488 or D2487) % % % FILL FILL: 4 inches of Bituminous overlying 8 inches of POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to medium- grained, 855.8 1.0 Aggregate Base. with Gravel, brown, moist, medium dense. 823.8 34.0 SILTY SAND, fine - to medium - grained, with a trace of (Glacial Outwash) (continued) Gravel, brown, moist. SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine - grained, light 3.0 SM (Glacial Till) brown, moist, medium dense. 16 SP POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to medium - grained, (Glacial Outwash) with a trace of Gravel, brown, dry, loose to medium is j 23 dense. 818.8 39.0_ — ! (Glacial Outwash) —� 7 I SP POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to medium - grained, � 817.3 40.5 brown, wet, medium dense. 26 J Glacial Outwash END OF BORING. - 3 2 See gradation. Water not observed with 39 feet of hollow -stem auger in 15 the ground. 12 Water not observed to cave -in depth of 26 feet 19.0 immediately after withdrawing the auger. SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- grained, with 1- I- L_ fI- -4- SM :. a trace of Gravel, brown, dry, medium dense. Boring immediately backfilled with grout. oraun inrenec L.orporauon page z of 1 `c c .L i a 4 BRAUN" INTERTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project BL- 05- 03812C BORING: ST -106 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Centennial Lakes Redevelopment France Avenue and Gallagher Drive Edina, Minnesota DRILLER: Brett Oldenburg METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA Autohammer DATE: 4/12/06 SCALE: 1" = 4' Elev.. Depth feet feet ASTM Description of Materials BPF WL MC p200 Tests or Notes 856.8 0.0 Symbol (ASTM D2488 or D2487) % % FILL FILL: 4 inches of Bituminous overlying 8 inches of 855.8 1.0 Aggregate Base. SM SILTY SAND, fine - to medium - grained, with a trace of Gravel, brown, moist. 853.8 3.0 (Glacial Till) SP POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to medium - grained, with a trace of Gravel, brown, dry, loose to medium dense. I — (Glacial Outwash) —� 7 t— J 9 3 2 See gradation. 15 12 837.8 19.0 SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- grained, with SM :. a trace of Gravel, brown, dry, medium dense. 14 (Glacial Outwash) r Approximate Floor Grade 12 3 17 17 20 825.8 31.0 SP- I3L- US- U38I2G 13raun Intertec Uorporauon 51 -wo page i or BRAUN' I NTE RTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project BL- 05- 03812C BORING: ST -106 cost.) GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Centennial Lakes Redevelopment France Avenue and Gallagher Drive France Avenue and Gallagher Drive Edina, Minnesota Edina, Minnesota DRILLER: Brett Oldenburg METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA Autohammer DATE: 4/12/06 SCALE: 1" = 4' Elev. Depth Depth feet feet ASTM Description of Materials BPF WL MC p200 Tests or Notes 824.8 32.0 Symbol (ASTM D2488 or D2487) (ASTM D2488 or D2487) % % % SM FILL POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- grained, with V 20 856.1 L.0 layers of Sandy Silt, brown, moist, medium dense. _ —aggregate base. SM (Glacial Outwash) (continued) SILTY SAND, fine- to medium - grained, fine to medium Gravel, brown, moist. 23 820.8 36.0 853.1 4.0 SP POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to medium - grained, SP with a trace of Gravel, brown, moist to 38 feet then wet to POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to coarse - grained, with Gravel, brown, moist, loose. 8 waterbearing, medium dense. 24 = - (Glacial Outwash) 848.1 9.0 3 SP- a SM medium - grained, with layers of Sandy Lean Clay, bro 15 d816.3 40.5 27 END OF BORING. (Glacial Outwash) 843.11 14.0 Water not observed with 39 feet of hollow -stem auger in SM SILTY SAND, fine- to medium - grained, fine to medium the ground. Gravel, brown, moist, medium dense. _ 22 e (Glacial Till) Water not observed to cave -in depth of 35 feet immediately after withdrawing the auger. ' Boring immediately backfilled with grout. 20 ++ J 21 Grade L 833.1 24.0 i BL -05- 03912x` SM SILTY SAND, fine- to medium - grained, with layers of 31 -LUD pagecort BRAUNM I NTE RTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project BL- 05- 03812C BORING: ST -107 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Centennial Lakes Redevelopment France Avenue and Gallagher Drive Edina, Minnesota DRILLER: Brett Oldenburg METHOD: 3 I /4" HSA Autohammer DATE: 4/13/06 SCALE: 1" = 4' Elev. Depth feet feet ASTM Description of Materials BPF WL MC p200 Tests or Notes 857.1 0.0 Symbol (ASTM D2488 or D2487) % % FILL FILL: 4 inches of Bituminous overlying 7 inches of 856.1 L.0 —aggregate base. SM : SILTY SAND, fine- to medium - grained, fine to medium Gravel, brown, moist. (Glacial Outwash) 853.1 4.0 SP POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to coarse - grained, with Gravel, brown, moist, loose. 8 (Glacial Outwash) 848.1 9.0 SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to SM medium - grained, with layers of Sandy Lean Clay, bro 15 moist, medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) 843.11 14.0 SM SILTY SAND, fine- to medium - grained, fine to medium Gravel, brown, moist, medium dense. _ 22 (Glacial Till) 20 Approximate Floor 21 Grade (West Edge) 833.1 24.0 SM SILTY SAND, fine- to medium - grained, with layers of Poorly Graded Sand with Silt, brown, moist, medium 15 dense. (Glacial Till) 830.1 27.0 22 SP POORLY GRADED SAND, fine - grained, brown, moist, medium dense. (Glacial Till) 25 826.1 31.0 SP- o1 aun wLcI Xt; w[ Porauon S r -lu/ page I of 2 7 E I U BRAUN"' I NTE RTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project BL- 05- 03812C BORING: ST -107 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. LOCATION: See attached sketch. Centennial Lakes Redevelopment France Avenue and Gallagher Drive Edina, Minnesota Edina, Minnesota DRILLER: Brett Oldenburg DRILLER: Brett Oldenburg METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA Autohammer DATE: 4/13/06 SCALE: 1" = 4' Elev. Depth feet feet feet ASTM Description of Materials BPF WL MC p200 Tests or Notes 857.1 0.0 Symbol (ASTM D2488 or D2487) % % % SM FILL POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine - grained, FILL: 4 inches of Bituminous overlying 7 inches of 856.1 I.0 brown, moist, medium dense. a re ate base. SM (Glacial Outwash) (continued) SILTY SAND, fine- to medium - grained, fine to medium Approximate floor Gravel, brown, moist. grade (east side) (Glacial Outwash) 28 853.1 4.0 SP POORLY GRADED SAND, fine•• t:) oarse- gained, with I ( Gravel, brown, moist, loose. _ g ' { !+ (Glacial Outwash) 7 Approximate 81$.1 �I ;! 848.1 9.0 I Elevator Pit Grade SP- SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine - grained, POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to SIA SM brown, waterbearing, medium dense. medium- grained, with layers of Sandy Lean Clay, brown,- 15 ' { f.' (Glacial Outwash) moist, medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) An open triangle in 815.1 J 20 the water level (WL) column indicates the depth i 843.1 14.0 . POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to SM medium- grained, with a trace of Gravel, brown, SM at which SILTY SAND, fine- to medium - grained, fine to medium waterbearing, medium dense. Gravel, brown, moist, medium dense. 22 groundwater was (Glacial Outwash) (Glacial Till) observed while 17 20 7 25 — 20 Groundwater levels fluctuate. i 16 illllllllllll 50.5 17 Approximate Floor END OF BORING. 21 Water observed at 38 feet with 49 feet of hollow -stem Grade auger in the ground. (West Edge) t 833.1 24.0 Water not observed to cave -in depth of 37 feet jj SM SILT Y SAND, fine- to medium - grained, with layers of — immediately after withdrawing the auger. - Poorly Graded Sand with Silt, brown, moist, medium 15 cr nc m011r Boring immediately backfilled with bentonite grout. dense. (Glacial Till) 830.1 27.0 22 SP POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- grained, brown, moist, - medium dense. (Glacial Till) 25 826.1 31.0 SP- L 141 SLAW page 1 of t i J BRAUN"" I NTE RTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project BL- 05- 03812C BORING: ST -107 tout. GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Centennial Lakes Redevelopment France Avenue and Gallagher Drive Edina, Minnesota DRILLER: Brett Oldenburg METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA Autohammer DATE: 4/13/06 SCALE: V = 4' Elev. Depth feet feet ASTM Description of Materials BPF WL MC p200 Tests or Notes 825.1 32.0 Symbol (ASTM D2488 or D2487) % % SM POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine - grained, 29 brown, moist, medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) (continued) Approximate floor grade (east side) 28 I ( 22 ' !+ 7 Approximate 81$.1 39.0 I Elevator Pit Grade SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine - grained, SIA ! brown, waterbearing, medium dense. 21 ' { f.' (Glacial Outwash) An open triangle in 815.1 42.0 20 the water level (WL) column indicates the depth SP- . POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to SM medium- grained, with a trace of Gravel, brown, at which waterbearing, medium dense. groundwater was (Glacial Outwash) observed while 17 drilling. Groundwater levels fluctuate. 16 806.6 50.5 17 END OF BORING. Water observed at 38 feet with 49 feet of hollow -stem auger in the ground. Water not observed to cave -in depth of 37 feet - immediately after withdrawing the auger. - cr nc m011r Boring immediately backfilled with bentonite grout. u.auu auw�w� wiNv�auvu Sl -IU/ pagelolz J BRAUN"' I NTE RTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project BL- 05- 03812C BORING: ST -107 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION BORING: ST -107 (Cont.) GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Centennial Lakes Redevelopment France Avenue and Gallagher Drive Edina, Minnesota DRILLER: Brett Oldenburg METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA Autohammer DATE: 4/13/06 SCALE: V = 4' Elev. Depth SM POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- grained, 29 feet feet ASTM Description of Materials BPF WL MC p200 Tests or Notes 857.1 0.0 Symbol (ASTNI D2488 or D2487) FILL FILL: 4 inches of Bituminous overlying 7 inches of Approximate f or 856.1 1.0 a re ate base. grade (east side), SM SILTY SAND, fine- to medium - grained, fine to medium 28 Gravel, brown, moist. e (Glacial Outwash) Q / / / / / / / / / / / /// 0 853.1 4.0 1 Approximate Elevator Pit Grade ' SP POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to coarse- grained, with SP- Gravel, brown, moist, loose. 8 POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- grained, cc SM (Glacial Outwash) 21 An open triangle in i 's (Glacial Outwash) the water level s 8 L 5.1 42.0 i 848.1 9.0 (WL) column indicates the depth C CL at which i SP- SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to 20 POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, tine- to SM medium- grained, with layers of Sandy Lean Clay, brow 15 groundwater was moist, medium dense. observed while CU (Glacial Outwash) drilling. Groundwater levels 843.1 14.0 17 fluctuate. 0 0 c i SM SILTY SAND, fine- to medium - grained, fine to medium :1— Gravel, brown, moist, medium dense. 22 +i (Glacial Till) 16 20 7 25 _I 20 v 806.6 50.5 17 � Approximate Floor 21 Grade Water observed at 38 feet with 49 feet of hollow -stem (West Edge) 833.1 24.0 §M—"::-' SILTY SAND, fine- to medium - grained, with layers of a Poorly Graded Sand with Silt, brown, moist, medium 15 immediately after withdrawing the auger. dense. Boring immediately backfilled with bentonite grout. (Glacial Till) F 830.1 27.0 22 yU 7 SP POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- grained, brown, moist, medium dense. (Glacial Till) a V U 25 826.1 31.0 0 V O S P- BL-05-03812C -a V o ----- — ___ ...1 .......1.1-6.,,,- sl -wi page I of BRAUN"' LOG OF BORING I NTE RTEC Braun Project BL- 05- 03812C BORING: ST -107 (Cont.) GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Centennial Lakes Redevelopment LOCATION: See attached sketch. France Avenue and Gallagher Drive Edina, Minnesota DRILLER: Brett Oldenburg METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA Autohammer DATE: 4/13/06 SCALE: 1" = 4' Elev. Depth feet feet ASTM Description of Materials BPF WL MC p200 Tests or Notes 825.1 32.0 Symbol (ASTM D2488 or D2487) % % 7 SM POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- grained, 29 brown, moist, medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) (continued) Approximate f or grade (east side), 28 e 22 Q / / / / / / / / / / / /// 0 818.1 39.0 1 Approximate Elevator Pit Grade ' SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- grained, cc SM brown, waterbearing, medium dense. 21 An open triangle in o (Glacial Outwash) the water level s 8 L 5.1 42.0 (WL) column indicates the depth C CL at which SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to 20 X_ medium- grained, with a trace of Gravel, brown, groundwater was waterbearing, medium dense. observed while CU (Glacial Outwash) drilling. Groundwater levels 17 fluctuate. 0 0 c E= 16 U' v 806.6 50.5 17 � END OF B')R_-,;G -� Water observed at 38 feet with 49 feet of hollow -stem auger in the ground. Water not observed to cave -in depth of 37 feet a immediately after withdrawing the auger. 0 Boring immediately backfilled with bentonite grout. F yU 7 a V U 0 V O -a V m M M BL- 05- 03812C Braun Intertec Corporation, Bloomington ST -107 page 2 of 2 BRAUN` iNTERTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project BL- 05- 03812C BORING: ST -108 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Centennial Lakes Redevelopment France Avenue and Gallagher Drive Edina, Minnesota DRILLER: Brett Oldenburg METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA Autohammer DATE: 4/12/06 SCALE: 1" =41 Elev. Depth feet feet ASTM Description of Materials BPF WL MC Tests or Notes 854.9 0.0 Symbol (ASTM D2488 or D2487) % FILL 4 inches of Bituminous overlying Silty Sand, fine- to medium - grained, with Gravel, brown, moist. 850.9 4.0 SP- : ;� . POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to SM medium- grained, with a trace of Gravel, brown, moist, 8 loose to medium dense. ij (Glacial Outwash) i 14 840.9 14.0 SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- grained, SM brown, moist, medium dense. 15 3 (Glacial Outwash) 837.9 17.0 15 SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- grained, with SM layers of Sandy Silt, brown, moist, medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) r- 14 1 I 21 i- _ 20 ,. i 24 21 Approximate Floor Grade u� aw, uuc, w� a.w t,u, auuu st -rue page ! of t BRAUN"" NTE RTEC Braun Project BL- 05- 03812C GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Centennial Lakes Redevelopment France Avenue and Gallagher Drive Edina,. Minnesota DRILLER: Brett Oldenburg METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA Autohammer Elev. Depth feet feet ASTM Description of Materials 822.9 32.0 Symbol (ASTM D2488 or D2487) POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine layers of Sandy Silt, brown, moist, medium (Glacial Outwash) (continued) LOG OF BORING BORING: ST -108 (cont. LOCATION: See attached sketch. DATE: 4/12/06 1 SCALE: 1" = 4' BPF WL MC I Tests or Notes 22 I///////////// Approx irate Elevator Pit j_ 817.9 _ 37.0 Grade Sp- POORLY GRADED SAIVTJ with SILT, fine - grained, ( 18 SM brown, waterbearing, medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) > 14 18 15 16 Tr-804.41 804.4 50.5 �:.�ijl 17 el END OF BORING. Water observed at 41 feet with 49 feet of hollow -stem auger in the ground. Water not observed to cave -in depth of 36 feet immediately after withdrawing the auger. Boring immediately backfilled with bentorite grout. IL I I I Intertec Corporation ST -108 nape C C C C F a a a a rJ BRAUN s" INTERTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project BL- 05- 03812C BORING: ST -109 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Centennial Lakes Redevelopment France Avenue and Gallagher Drive France Avenue and Gallagher Drive Edina, Minnesota Edina, Minnesota DRILLER: Brett Oldenburg DRILLER: Brett Oldenburg METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA Autohammer DATE: 4/13/06 SCALE: 1" = 4' Elev. Depth feet feet feet ASTM Description of Materials BPF WL MC p200 Tests or Notes 856.3 0.0 Symbol (ASTM D2488 or D2487) % % FILL POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to medium - grained, 4 inches of Bituminous overlying Poorly Graded Sand with Gravel, brown, moist, medium dense. with Silt, fine- to medium - grained, fine Gravel, dark (Glacial Outwash) (continued' brown, moist. 853.3 3.0 22 819.3 37.0 SP POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to medium - grained, with Gravel, brown, moist, medium dense. SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to SM medium- grained, brown, waterbearing, medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) = (Glacial Outwash) 12 10 i 17 7 4 See Gradation i ,L — i I END OF BORING. - 19 Water observed at 39 feet with 40 feet of hollow -stem i r- I auger in the ground. �'lli i /lllll 27 Water not observed to cave -in depth of 35 feet Approximate Floor immediately after withdrawing the auger. Grade 16 Boring immediately backfilled with bentonite grout. 14 _i 17 18 1 or-aun mrenec L,orporauon 5 r -lug page I of 2 a BRAUN"' INTERTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project BL- 05- 03812C BORING: ST -109 (coat.) GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Centennial Lakes Redevelopment France Avenue and Gallagher Drive Edina, Minnesota DRILLER: Brett Oldenburg METHOD: 3 I /4" HSA Autobammer DATE: 4/13/06 SCALE: 1" = 4' Elev. Depth feet feet ASTM Description of Materials BPF WL MC p200 Tests or Notes 824.3 32.0 Symbol (ASTM D2488 or D2487) POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to medium - grained, 20 with Gravel, brown, moist, medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) (continued' 22 819.3 37.0 21 SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to SM medium- grained, brown, waterbearing, medium dense. = (Glacial Outwash) i - 815.8 40.5 18 END OF BORING. Water observed at 39 feet with 40 feet of hollow -stem I auger in the ground. Water not observed to cave -in depth of 35 feet immediately after withdrawing the auger. Boring immediately backfilled with bentonite grout. _i 1 � AT _nC_n7A 1 Ir Sr -109 page 2 of 2 a r c G V BRAUN "' I NTE RTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project BL- 05- 03812C BORING: ST -110 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. LOCATION: See attached sketch. Centennial Lakes Redevelopment France Avenue and Gallagher Drive Edina, Minnesota DRILLER: Brett Oldenburg METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA Autohammer DATE: 4/13/06 SCALE: 1" = 4' Elev. Depth feet feet ASTM Description of Materials BPF WL MC p200 Tests or Notes 851.7 0.0 Symbol (ASTM D2488 or D2487) % % FILL 4 inches of Bituminous overlying Silty Sand, fine- to 26 850.5 1.2 medium - grained, with Gravel, brown, moist. 817.7 34.0 SP- . .. POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to SM .' medium- grained, with a trace of Gravel, brown, moist, SM SILTY SAND, fine- to medium - grained, with layers of loose to medium dense. 20 (Glacial Outwash) 814. 37.0 14 t SM SILTY SALAD, fne- to medium - grained, with a trace : f i I �..:: Gravel, grayish brown, wet to waterbearing, loose to medium dense. !- (Glacial Till) 837.7 14.0 SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to SM medium- grained, fine to medium Gravel, brown, moist, 20 i medium dense. 9 (Glacial Outwash) 14 18 832.7 19.0 SC CLAYEY SAND, with a trace of Gravel, gray, moist, �— stiff. 16 12 qu = 4,400 psf ' (Glacial Till) 829.7 22.0 Water not observed to cave -in depth of 38 feet SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, very- to _ SM fine- grained, with layers of Sandy Silt, brown, moist, — Boring immediately back-filled with bentonite grout. 827.7 24.0 medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) J SF- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine - grained, with — SM a trace of Gravel, brown, moist, medium dense. 17 (Glacial Outwash) 824.7 27.0 23 Approximate Floor I SM SILTY SAND, fine- to medium- grained, with Gravel, brown, moist, medium dense. Grade (Glacial Till) 27 8 25 olaun rnEenect- orporauon S1 -1111) page 1 01 :1 y a S a u BRAUN" I NTE RTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project BL- 05- 03812C BORING: ST -110 (coat.) GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Centennial Lakes Redevelopment France Avenue and Gallagher Drive Edina, Minnesota DRILLER: Brett Oldenburg METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA Autohammer DATE: 4/13/06 SCALE: 1" = 4' Elev. Depth feet feet ASTM Description of Materials BPF 1 WL MC p200 Tests or Notes 819.7 32.0 Symbol (ASTM D2488 or D2487) % % SILTY SAND, fine- to medium - grained, with Gravel, 26 brown, moist, medium dense. 817.7 34.0 (Glacial Till) (continued) SM SILTY SAND, fine- to medium - grained, with layers of Poorly Graded Sand with Silt, brown, wet, medium dens 20 (Glacial Till) 814. 37.0 14 t SM SILTY SALAD, fne- to medium - grained, with a trace : f i I �..:: Gravel, grayish brown, wet to waterbearing, loose to medium dense. !- (Glacial Till) 11 8 i 9 14 16 801.2 50.5 END OF BORING. Water observed at 41 feet with 49 feet of hollow -stem auger in the ground. Water not observed to cave -in depth of 38 feet immediately after withdrawing the auger. -a — Boring immediately back-filled with bentonite grout. J BL -U_" UJ S 12U Braun Lntertec Corporation S1-11U page 1 of 2 BRAUN' INTERTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project BL- 05- 03812C BORING_ ST -111 GEOTECIMCAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Centennial Lakes Redevelopment France Avenue and Gallagher Drive Edina, Minnesota DRILLER: Brett Oldenburg METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA Autohammer DATE: 4/11/06 SCALE: 1" = 4' Elev. Depth feet feet ASTM Description of Materials BPF WL Tests or Notes 856.4 0.0 Symbol (.ASTM D2488 or D2487) FILL 3 inches of Bituminous overlying, Poorly Graded Sand with Silt, fine- to medium - grained, with Gravel, brown, moist. (Possible Fill) 16 843.7 4.0 14 i 849.4 7.0 SC CLAYEY SAND, fine- grained, with a trace of Gravel, ll 11 light brown, moist, rather stiff to stiff. SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to SM medium- grained, dark brown and brown, moist, medium > 847.4 9.0 dense. GlacialOutwash 15 838.7 9.0 SP POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to medium - grained, i 845.9 10.5 with Gravel, brown, moist, medium dense. Glacial Outwash 16 SILTY SAND, fine- grained, with Silt layers, brown, wet, medium dense. 26 END OF BORING. 10.5 Glacial Till Water not observed with 9 feet of hollow -stem auger in END OF BORING. the ground. Water not observed with 9 feet of hollow -stem auger in Water not observed to cave -in depth of 6 feet immediately the ground. after withdrawing the auger. Water not observed to cave -in depth of 5 1/2 feet Boring immediately backfiiled. l immediately after withdrawing the auger. At _nc- nauiIr, Boring immediately backfilled. —I _I a; `c c i RAU ' INTERTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project BL- 05- 03812C BORING: ST -112 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Centennial Lakes Redevelopment LOCATION: See attached sketch. France Avenue and Gallagher Drive Edina, Minnesota DRILLER: Brett Oldenburg METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA Autohammer DATE: 4/11/06 SCALE: 1" = 4' Elev. Depth feet feet ASTM Description of Materials BPF WL Tests or Notes 847.7 0.0 Symbol (ASTM D2488 or D2487) FILL 5 inches of Bituminous overlying Poorly Graded Sand with Silt, fine- to medium - grained, with Gravel, brown, moist. 16 843.7 4.0 SC CLAYEY SAND, fine- grained, with a trace of Gravel, light brown, moist, rather stiff to stiff. 10 (Glacial Till) 15 838.7 9.0 SM SILTY SAND, fine- grained, with Silt layers, brown, wet, medium dense. 26 837.2 10.5 Glacial Till END OF BORING. Water not observed with 9 feet of hollow -stem auger in the ground. Water not observed to cave -in depth of 5 1/2 feet immediately after withdrawing the auger. Boring immediately backfilled. —I _I • .. — st - ttt page t of t bl, -U3U35 1 Z csraun tntertec t-orporanon 51 -112 page lot I BRAUN=" I NTE RTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project BL- 05- 03812C BORING: ST -113 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Centennial Lakes Redevelopment Centennial Lakes Redevelopment France Avenue and Gallagher Drive Edina, Minnesota DRILLER: Brett Oldenburg METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA Autohammer DATE: 4/11/06 SCALE: 1" = 4' Elev. Depth feet feet feet feet ASTM Description of Materials BPF WL MC p200 Tests or Notes 852.7 0.0 Symbol (ASTM D2488 or D2487) FILL % % FILL 4 1/2 inches of Bituminous overlying Poorly Graded Sand brown. 851.9 2.0 with Silt, fine- to coarse - grained, with Gravel, brown, 9 SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to moist, medium dense. SM medium- grained, fine to medium Gravel, brown, moist, (Glacial Outwash) loose to medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) 16 6 12 848.7 4.0 SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, wLh Clay seams, SM brown; moist, loose. �n 10 (Glacial Outwash) 13 845.71 7.0 844.9 9.0 15 SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, with layers of _ SM Silty Sand, with a trace of Gravel, brown, moist, medium 15 I (Glacial Till) dense. 841.9 12.0 18 (Glacial Outwash) SM SILTY SAND, fine- to medium - grained, with layers of Sand, brown, moist, medium dense. 17 842.2 10.5 27 END OF BORING. 23 Water not observed with 9 feet of hollow -stem auger in 834.9 19.0 the ground. SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- grained, SM brown, moist, medium dense. Water not observed to cave -in depth of 6 feet immediately 833.4 20.5 (Glacial Outwash) after withdrawing the auger. — END OF BORING. Boring immediately backfilled. the ground. Water not observed to cave -in depth of 17 1/2 feet immediately after withdrawing the auger. Approximate Boring immediately backfilied. Sanitary Sewer Invert i. l r- tsL- uw-usas/t, tsraun Intent l:orporation ST -113 page 1 or 1 G .4 1 S C d v, B RAU N"' I NTE RTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project BL- 05- 03812C BORING: ST -114 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Centennial Lakes Redevelopment France Avenue and Gallagher Drive Edina, Minnesota DRILLER: Brett Oldenburg METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA Autohammer DATE: 4/13/06 SCALE: 1" = 4' Elev.. Depth feet feet ASTM Description of Materials BPF WL Tests or Notes 853.9 0.0 Symbol (ASTM D2488 or D2487) FILL 4 inches of Bituminous overlying Silty Sand, with Gravel, brown. 851.9 2.0 9 SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to SM medium- grained, fine to medium Gravel, brown, moist, loose to medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) 13 844.9 9.0 SC CLAYEY SAND, with layers of Sandy Silt, brown, moist, stiff. 15 (Glacial Till) 841.9 12.0 18 SM SILTY SAND, fine- to medium - grained, with layers of Sand, brown, moist, medium dense. (Glacial Till) 27 23 834.9 19.0 SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- grained, SM brown, moist, medium dense. 28 833.4 20.5 (Glacial Outwash) — END OF BORING. Water not observed with 19 feet of hollow -stem auger in the ground. Water not observed to cave -in depth of 17 1/2 feet immediately after withdrawing the auger. Boring immediately backfilied. nUw -wo iZ%- Braun Intent t;orporanon ST -114 page I or I BRAUN" INTERTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project BL- 05- 03812C BORING: ST -115 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Centennial Lakes Redevelopment Centennial Lakes Redevelopment LOCATION: See attached sketch. France Avenue and Gallagher Drive Edina, Minnesota Edina, Minnesota DRILLER: Scott McLean DRILLER: Scott McLean METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA Autohammer DATE: 4/13/06 SCALE: 1" = 4' Elev. Depth feet feet feet ASTM Description of Materials BPF WL MC p200 Tests or Notes 856.1 0.0 Symbol (ASTM D2488 or D2487) % % FILL POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- grained, light brown, FILL: Poorly Graded Sand with Silt, fine- to dry, medium dense. medium - grained, with a trace of Gravel, dark brown to (Glacial Outwash) (continued) brown, moist. (Possible Fill) 819.1 852.1 4.0 25 SP- FILL POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- grained, with FILL: Poorly Graded Sand with Silt, fine- to SM .' Silty Sand, brown, wet, medium dense. medium - grained, with a trace of Gravel, layer of Clay, 8 (Glacial Outwash) brown, wet. 817.1 39.0 (Possible Fill) 849.1 7.0 POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- grained, 3 SM brown, waterbearing, medium dense. 21 FILL FILL: Poorly Graded Sand with Silt, fine- to (Glacial Outwash) medium - grained, with Sand layer with Gravel, brown, 847.1 9.0 very wet. . Possible Fill 807.1 49.0 SC SAND, with a trace of Gravel, brown, moist. SP- _ POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to _ SA I .: (Glacial Till) 17 14 42 844.1 12.0 medium dense. 20 Approximate Floor Grade SP (1 POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to coarse- grained, with Gravel, light brown, dry, medium dense. 842.1 14.0 (Glacial Outwash) MLS . SANDY SILT, light brown, moist, medium dense. I I i i I I (Glaciofluvium) 32 10 59 30 837.1 0.0 SP POORLY 031321,pED SAND, f,,-.e `., coarse - ;rained, with Gravel, light brown, dry, medium dense. 24 2 4 See Gradation (Glacial Outwash) 832.1 24.0 SP =. POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- grained, with Sllty Sand, light brown, dry, medium dense. 14 (Glacial Outwash) 829.1 27.0 15 SP POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- grained, light brown, dry, medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) or nc nvor�r 21 BRAUNK"A INTERTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project BL- 05- 03812C BORING: ST -115 Cont.) GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Centennial Lakes Redevelopment France Avenue and Gallagher Drive Edina, Minnesota DRILLER: Scott McLean METHOD: 3 I /4" HSA Autohammer DATE: 4/13/06 SCALE: 1" = 4' Elev. Depth feet feet ASTM Description of Materials BPF WL MC p200 Tests or Notes 824.1 32.0 Symbol (ASTM D2488 or D2487) % % POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- grained, light brown, 25 dry, medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) (continued) 24 819.1 37.0 25 SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- grained, with SM .' Silty Sand, brown, wet, medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) 817.1 39.0 SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- grained, SM brown, waterbearing, medium dense. 21 (Glacial Outwash) 12 807.1 49.0 SP- _ POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to _ SA I .: medium- grained, brown, waterbearing, very loose to 3 medium dense. (1 (Glacial Gutwash) - 9 Drilled with mud in auger. I I i i I I 17 ua 1 L11- -a UIpUIauUU St -tU page t or s t$L-U:)- W51L1, tsraun lmtenec Lorporatton zil -lu pageLol -s `c L E C c i L L L c C L L f L B RAU N"' I NTE RTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project BL- 05- 03812C BORING: ST -115 (coat.) GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Centennial Lakes Redevelopment France Avenue and Gallagher Drive Edina, Minnesota DRILLER: Scott McLean . METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA Autohammer DATE: 4/13/06 SCALE: 1" = 4' Elev. Depth feet feet ASTM Description of Materials BPF WL MC p200 Tests or Notes 792.1 64.0 Symbol (ASTM D2488 or D2487) % % FILL POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to medium - grained, brown, waterbearing, very loose to 20 medium dense. 12 851.0 4.0 (Glacial Outwash) (continued) SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to — SNI 787.1 69.0 17 i SP ' {. POORLY GRADED SAND, coarse grained, with a trace _ – of Gravel, brown, waterbearing, medium dense. 20 (Glacial Outwash) i (Glacial Outwash) 7.0 17 I SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT', fine- to SM 27 medium- grained, with Clay layers and Gravel, brov7l, 22 moist, medium dense. 775.6 80.5 846.0 9.0 Glacial Outwash END OF BORING. f SM :: SILTY SAND, fine- to medium - grained, with a trace of X. Gravel, brown, moist, medium dense. 21 ,f (Glacial Till) 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 843.0 12.0 29 tsL- 03- 0.s61Zc tsraun intent corporation a 1 -113 page .3 01 I a L L F L C e c L L c c f C i L L L l BRAUN` INTERTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project BL- 05- 03812C BORING: ST -117 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Centennial Lakes Redevelopment France Avenue and Gallagher Drive Edina, Minnesota DRILLER: Brett Oldenburg METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA Autohammer DATE: 4/13/06 SCALE: 1" = 4' Elev. Depth feet feet ASTM Description of Materials BPF WL MC p200 Tests or Notes 855.0 0.0 Symbol (ASTM D2488 or D2487) % % FILL 5 inches of Bituminous overlying Silty Sand, fine - grained, with Clay layers, brown, moist, medium dense. 12 851.0 4.0 SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to — SNI medium- grained, with a trace of Gravel, brown, moist, 17 medium dense. – (Glacial Outwash) 848.0 7.0 17 SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT', fine- to SM medium- grained, with Clay layers and Gravel, brov7l, moist, medium dense. 846.0 9.0 Glacial Outwash SM :: SILTY SAND, fine- to medium - grained, with a trace of X. Gravel, brown, moist, medium dense. 21 (Glacial Till) 843.0 12.0 29 15 CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, gray, wet, stiff. (Glacial Till) 841.0 14.0 Approximate Floor Grade Sc- SILTY CLAYEY SAND, fine- to medium - grained, with a SM trace of Gravel, brown, moist, medium dense. 24 14 42 (Glacial Till) 838.0 17.0 A. 24 2 7 See Gradation SP- .. POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine - grained, SM brown, dry, medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) Pressuremeter test at 21.5 feet. Limit Pressures = 25 tsf 831.0 24.0 Modulus = 325 tsf SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine - grained, with SM Sandy Silt layers, brown, moist, dense. 35 i i I 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 (Glacial Outwash) bL -U }Uj 81 Lt; Braun lntertec corporation 51 -11/ page lor3 F C C E 0 a n C C c C C a BRAUN'" I NTE RTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project BL- 05- 03812C BORING: ST -117 coat. GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Centennial Lakes Redevelopment LOCATION: See attached sketch. France Avenue and Gallagher Drive Edina, Minnesota Edina, Minnesota DRILLER: Brett Oldenburg DRILLER: Brett Oldenburg METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA Autohanuner DATE: 4/13/06 SCALE: 1" = 4' Elev. Depth -' feet feet feet ASTIvl Description of Materials BPF WL MC p200 Tests or Notes 823.0 32.0 Symbol (ASTM D2488 or D2487) % % % I' .. POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- grained, with medium - grained, brown, waterbearing, medium dense. Sandy Silt layers, brown, moist, dense. Glacial Outwash) ) (continued) (Glacial Outwash) (continued) 1 18 32 818.0 37.0 22 26 776.0 79.0 SP- : POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to SM :. medium- grained, brown, wet to waterbearing, medium SM SILTY SAND, fine- grained, brown, waterbearing, dense. 774.5 ' 816.0 39.0 (Glacial Till) dense. (Glacial Outwash) ' SP SM END OF BORING. POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- grained, brown, waterbearing, medium dense. 20 A. (Glacial Outwash) i i ' 811.0 44.0 SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine - grained, SM brownish, waterbearing, loose to medium dense. 10 (Glacial Outwash) j J. {' 25 801.0 54.0 SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to SM medium- grained, brown, waterbearing, medium dense. 16 (Glacial Outwash) ti 22 at.- ns_naR nc 'st -tti page lots a a C BRAUN` I NTE RTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project BL- 05- 03812C BORING: ST -117 Cont. GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Centennial Lakes Redevelopment France Avenue and Gallagher Drive Edina, Minnesota DRILLER: Brett Oldenburg METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA Autohammer DATE: 4/13/06 SCALE: 1" = 4' Elev. Depth -' feet feet ASTM Description of Materials BPF WL MC p200 Tests or Notes i 791.0 64.0 Symbol (ASTM D2488 or D2487) % % j POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to medium - grained, brown, waterbearing, medium dense. 20 Glacial Outwash) ) (continued) 1 18 22 776.0 79.0 9 j SM SILTY SAND, fine- grained, brown, waterbearing, dense. 774.5 80.5_ I (Glacial Till) 30 END OF BORING. 01 dUll 111CDI WO l.Ul PUI "QUUn st -tt/ page sots F BRAUN"' I NTE RTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project BL- 05- 03812C BORING: ST-119 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Centennial Lakes Redevelopment France Avenue and Gallagher Drive Edina, Minnesota DRILLER: Brett Oldenburg METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA Autohammer DATE: 4/13/06 SCALE: 111 = 4' Elev. Depth feet feet ASTM Description of Materials BPF WL Tests or Notes 854.9 0.0 Symbol (ASTM D2488 or D2487) FILL 4 inches of Bituminous overlying Poorly Graded Sand with Silt, fine- to medium - grained, brown with a trace of dark brown. (Possible Fill) 21 Approximate Floor Grade — (,> I — 20 SP POORLY GRADED SAND, fir, -grained, with at:ace o(' �� i Gravel, brown, dry, medium dense. I Glacial Outwash) I 14 I 15 840.9 14.0 SP POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to medium - grained, with a trace of Gravel, brown, dry, medium dense. 13 (Glacial Outwash) 837.9 17.0 27 SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to SM medium- grained, with Clay lenses, brown, moist, medium dense. I i (Glacial Outwash) 29 832.9 22.0. �. 29 SC % CLAYEY SAND, wit, Silty an seams, brown, moist, medium dense. (Glacial Till) 830.9 24.0 SM :" SILTY SAND, fine- to medium- grained, with Grave!, brown, moist, very dense. 73 829.4 25.5 (Glacial Till ;— END OF BORING. — Water not observed with 24 feet of hollow -stem auger in I the ground. Water not observed to cave -in depth of 13 1/2 feet ;�— immediately after withdrawing the auger. Boring immediately backfilled. 7 t3L- U)-UJb It- tiraun lnteneC lArporauon 31-117 page 1 V1 t M V-17 lW_ LO Off. u PROJECT: 89 -108 FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION" ., •� '� BCiit3i: Proposed Centennial lakes F - , K s ; Theater. - ; s % FrancerAve 8 k 76th St 6 50 N, See Attache "Sketi �-� rs Edina; Minnesota � ,. .; d �- D _ .3 1$ :8911S1=� 1 i T� r Etev Depth _-D2487°_ De-scriptlori`of Materials `� � a , Symbol (ASTM "D2488) :SC :FILL:'. CLAYEY SAND, #Jne Ao medium - grained; . xth `-a trace of.ett�500` at�� Gravel,;' lenses :of POOWY yD800 E:°� f1�Yat#tt� GRADED SAND, "brown, "frozen. 33: 23,9.0 1,. I SP 0 i F7i RiY GRADED SAND . f to r 1 r r ! jf1ne:to medivm, grained .with trace of Gravel and ALT, brown, 1 moist; medium dense_ I y. (GI aciEi out.wash) {2 4 3 Zf r_ 13r ... m m 826.0 16 21 CL LEAN CLAY, with fine to medium f m Gravel lenses, brown, wet, hard. a (Glacial Till) 5 v ca 821.5 20.5 31 C END OF BORING. co Water level not encountered with 2fi' of hol 1 ow -stem auger in the ground. Eater level not encountered to cave -in depth of 11.5' immediate- ly after withdrawal of auger_ = Boring in-ttediately backfilled. __ . _ MM •c.'.'v� A�`d"" L 0 0 0PBORM , :�','iOJECT- 89 -108 FOUNDATION IW.'ESTIGATIOtd P- oposed.Centenni al-La kes Tli'' t t ��OEGAOT9 € - Fi"arice Ave & bd -;76th St 835hT}NZ5�' Edtria; See` ti "Set NE i nnesoza i ,. q �c_t� r , ASTE44 �tP * Descption of ;iAatertats g _ ri _max 4� aF SymtioE (AST,iIA D2488) SP F i POORLY :_GRAD SRll0 fine .f.00 =: - '�-- LL rr�d� [say grai -aeo , - kn nth -a . trace - g.' a - �- � _ LT 4nii l�rayel brow f, oxen `to 3J t?idn moist. 34' 211 " {r Y wr_ .AW SP- POORLY GRADED'SAND, "fine.to 14 E finelto medium- grained, with a = CD trace of_-SILT and Gravel, brown, �• moist, medium dense to loose.- '= (Glacial Outwash) 9: v c 9 - 0 8 5.4 14 - :> s< SW WELL GRADED SAND, fine to coarse grained, with Gravel brown 16 Cl r?830.4 r M Mist, medium dense - (Glacial oul:wash) i9 -- CI_ { �5. A NL ' LEAN ,. CLAv c' � 1 2u i .aC ,d: l if END OF BORING. Water level not encountered With 20' of hollow -stem auger in the ground. Water level not encountered to cave -in depth of 9.5` immediate- j ly after withdrawal of auger. Boring immediately backfilled. *moist, stiff. (Glacial Till) is 4' T GYyC F �Y j'r XLa -: LO:G PROJECT: 89 -108 FOUNDATION'INVESTIGATION Proposed Centennial Lakes LC0GAT10i\1 Theater.-.:,- nv2 •& % 7vtll. St- Edina, r n°x� b965 N , See Attachedr5keti`?z` Minnesota �w y� ASTM Elev. Depth ' D2487 Description o! M>3tenals BP WL 856.0 0 - Symbol _ (ASTM D2488) A> s;r "4 - > � � SP �P OOR' Y - GRADED -SAND; -fi ne u ` ' medium = grained, with a trace ;of `��� " SILT 'and. Gravel , :,wi th l enses : of {{ ri C I :1 `�? and POORLY. . 1 GRADED GRAVE , bro'.'n, moist; l ocse' to :aec: i um de' use. ' i tC C 10 E a 10 = :Y 6 r_ 0 $ <: o 835.5 20.5 1 45 m. o END OF BORING. t _ °" Water level not encountered with 20' of hollow -stem auger in $ the ground. i Water level not encountered to cave -in depth of 7' immediately j r zfter withdrawal of auger. i Boring immediately backfilled. 0 0 J u U 0 0 J O] 9 1:11 90 /OZ /c 10 0 NF1Vd0 fd0OZ18 CO- 50-"10 tN1SV SO ° 0 ¢ U u 0 °z < <¢ rL O r C/3 ¢ o Q� U H 0 0 0 t ry 0 7 10 r II II U U d o 0 0 u-1 N > ¢ vi f� :v � U = � N C V DO oo ° CGS� P = i V r a v� LU a z � o .� °� ¢ a, Q r ❑ c� C7 CC gUwr� m m - z N _ N L.L1 o U LLJ AftAlk 00 r- 'r 0 0 0 O O� 0 `D ISSHd 1N30'd9d 0 0 J u U 0 0 J O] 9 1:11 90 /OZ /c 10 0 NF1Vd0 fd0OZ18 CO- 50-"10 tN1SV SO GRAIN SIZE ACCUMULATION CURVE (ASTM) GRAVEL _ SAND I FINES I COARSE FINE COARSE MrDIUM FINE SILT CLAY 3" V 3/4" 1/2" 3/8" 4 10 20 40 60 100 200 100 " 4 10 20 40 60 100 200 100 U . SI V SI ES j 90---- U . S1 IV SI ES -- i 90 80 — i I 80 70 - 70 cj 60 z I I � -- I i u 60 ¢ I 4 So - V) u 1 W 40 iu a j 30--- 30 - - - -- - i 20 ---�- ! I 10 o -- -!_ 1 171 1 11 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 PARTICLE DIAMETER, rrun I Braun Project BL- 05- 03812C GRAVEL 0.0% CLASSIFICATION BRAUN sn, Centennia? Lnkes Redevelopment p SAND 96.4% POORLY GRADED SAND(SP) France Ave u. Gallagher Dr FINES 3.6% E N T E RT E C Edina, MN D6o =o.441 C.=2.7 D30 =0.273 BORIN( : 105 DFPTH: 25.0' Cc =1.0 DI0 =0.161 BL- 05.03312C Braun Intertec Corporation Pk' - LWHK1 1 "W GRAIN SIZE ACCUMULATION CURVE (ASTM) GRAVEL SAND T FINES COARSE I FINE FINE SILT CLAY 3" 1" 3/4" 1/2" 3/ " 4 10 20 40 60 100 200 100 U . SI V SI ES 90---- -- i 80 — 70 I I � -- u 60 4 V) W iu a j 30--- - - - -- i ---�- I I I I 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 PARTICLE DIAMETER, mm Brau Mj roject BL- 05- 03812C sM Center,.. al fakes Redevelopment GRAVEL 0.4% SAND CLASSIFICATION: 97.9% POORLY GRADED SAND(SP) France Ave S Gallagher Dr FINES 1.7% Edina, `RN D0 603 2.4 D30 083 C,"= BORING ?06 DFPTH: 10.0' D10 =0.251 1.0 BL- 05.0381 C Braun Intertec Corporation ' ,YN SIZE ACC UMIJLA'TION 1l-A']1' ,(,"J'STM) I SAND GRAVEL. I SAND FINES I COARSE MEDIUM I FINE SILT I CLAY COARSE FINE I COARSE MEDIUM FINE I SILT CLAY POORLY GRADED SAND(SP) 3" 1" 3/4" I /2" 3/8" 4 10 20 40 60 100 200 FINES 4.5% 100 J Edina, MN INTERTEC D60 =0.636 Cu =3.4 D30 =0.353 _ Cc= 1. 4 BORING: 115 DEPTH: 20.0' D10 =0.186 BL- 05- 03812C Braun Infertec Corporation U . Sn VE SI MS Ll I 90 I � I 80 -- I 70 I v 60 N SU — — 1a.. w U �I a 40 30 20 IU U _ 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 PARTICLE DIAMETER, mm Braun Project BL- 05- 038120 GRAVEL' 9.8% CLASSIFICATION: BRAUN sM Centennial Lakes Redevelopment SAND 86.3 % POORLY GRADED SAND(SP) France Ave & Gallagher Dr FINES 3.9% l N T E RT E C Edina, MN D60 Cu =6.2 =01.4297 D19 BORING: 109 DEPTH: 15.0' D10 =0.208 Cc =0.7 b L- U >- UJbILI v c. t- �a U W rsraun Intertec �-orporauon GRAIN SIZE ACCUMULATION CURVE (iaSTM) GRAVEL I SAND FINES COARSE I FINE I COARSE MEDIUM I FINE SILT I CLAY 3" 1" 3/4" 1/2" 3/8" 4 10 20 40 60 100 200 00 U , S V S1 ES 90 80 — 70 60 — 50 — 40 30 20 — 10 0 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.00 s v PARTICLE DIAMETER, nun i Braun Project BL-05-03812C GRAVEL 2.2% CLASSIFICATION: sna Centennial Lakes Redevelopment p SAND 93.3% POORLY GRADED SAND(SP) France Ave & Gallagher Dr FINES 4.5% J Edina, MN INTERTEC D60 =0.636 Cu =3.4 D30 =0.353 _ Cc= 1. 4 BORING: 115 DEPTH: 20.0' D10 =0.186 BL- 05- 03812C Braun Infertec Corporation IZ�I 190 /0Z/6 1QD'NnV)f9 [(f O'JZf8£0-50- -I9 W1SV SO Descriptive Terminology Rev. 10/04 Standard D 2487 00 Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System) Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and Soils Classification Group No. 10 to No. 40 Group Names Using Laboratory Tests a i Symbol Group Name b C Gravels Clean Gravels C. > 4 and 1: C : 3 ° ° GW Well graded gravel° 0 0 C) than 50% of coarse fraction Less than 5% fines ° C < 4 and /or 1 > C >3 ° GP Poorly graded gravel d m retained on Gravels with Fines Fines classify as ML or MH GM Silty gravel d r9 o oN No. 4 sieve More than 12% fines ° Fines classify as CL or CH U Cla ey grave1119 C. 0 m O N Sands Clean Sands C° >_ 6 and 1 = C° < 3 0 SW Well- graded sand'' ` L Z ° 50% or more of Less than 5% fines I C < 6 and /or 1 > Cc> 3 c C. SP 3 O z o O o coarse fraction passes Sands with Fines Fines classify as ML or MH SM Silty sand 19 h E No. 4 sieve More than 12%1 Fines classify as CL or CH SC clavev sand fg h L -" Silts and Cla s y Inor anic 9 Q vl CL Lean clay PI. < 4 or plots below "A" linel ML Silt k' " .o m d, Liquid limit U) a ,N less than 50 Organic Cf LL, OL Organic clay ' " n c d o Liquid limit - not dried OL Organic silt mE - Silts and clays Inorganic PI plots on or above "A" line o 6 Q z � U U > �� ¢ U� J a cn U PI plots below "A" line MH Elastic silt k' " Z5 z Liquid limit iL o 50 or more Organic Liquid limit - oven dried OH Organic clay k' " P ul MH < 0.75 Liquid limit - not dried OH Organic silt k' m q Highly Organic Soils Primarily organic matter, dark in color and organic odor PT Peat MH or OH LrOH F co co u u u � V ornr UU N 1+1 U �i Ivl UC/) N yin rp o N o o o v - 0 E F W U �= � Q v — W N —O 000 0 W 11 II II q Q z boo C7 U) r1 Q �" U N C ti a� 00 E O o G O D v ILI to — s~ in cx; Z Lo F +: z m W rn � Cn o W > N V �- 1+ W r/] Q U W L.L. I 0 0 O O 0 00 0 r_ 0 10 0 In o 7 O o N 0 0 DNISSvd lr a:Md IZ�I 190 /0Z/6 1QD'NnV)f9 [(f O'JZf8£0-50- -I9 W1SV SO Descriptive Terminology Rev. 10/04 Standard D 2487 00 Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System) Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and Soils Classification Group No. 10 to No. 40 Group Names Using Laboratory Tests a i Symbol Group Name b C Gravels Clean Gravels C. > 4 and 1: C : 3 ° ° GW Well graded gravel° cMore c than 50% of coarse fraction Less than 5% fines ° C < 4 and /or 1 > C >3 ° GP Poorly graded gravel d m retained on Gravels with Fines Fines classify as ML or MH GM Silty gravel d r9 o oN No. 4 sieve More than 12% fines ° Fines classify as CL or CH GC Cla ey grave1119 C. 0 m O N Sands Clean Sands C° >_ 6 and 1 = C° < 3 0 SW Well- graded sand'' ` L Z ° 50% or more of Less than 5% fines I C < 6 and /or 1 > Cc> 3 c C. SP Poorly graded sand h o O o coarse fraction passes Sands with Fines Fines classify as ML or MH SM Silty sand 19 h E No. 4 sieve More than 12%1 Fines classify as CL or CH SC clavev sand fg h L -" Silts and Cla s y Inor anic 9 PI > 7 and plots on or above "A" line I CL Lean clay PI. < 4 or plots below "A" linel ML Silt k' " .o m d, Liquid limit U) a ,N less than 50 Organic Liquid limit - oven dried < 0 75 OL Organic clay ' " n c d o Liquid limit - not dried OL Organic silt mE - Silts and clays Inorganic PI plots on or above "A" line CH Fat clay k' " PI plots below "A" line MH Elastic silt k' " Z5 z Liquid limit iL o 50 or more Organic Liquid limit - oven dried OH Organic clay k' " P ul MH < 0.75 Liquid limit - not dried OH Organic silt k' m q Highly Organic Soils Primarily organic matter, dark in color and organic odor PT Peat a. Based on the material passing the 3-in (75mm) sieve. b. If field sample contained cobbles or boulders, or both, add "with cobbles or boulders or both" to group name. c. Cu = D60 10,0 C° = (D70)2 o D10xD. d. If soil contains 215 % sand, add 'with sand' to group name. o e. Gravels witih 5 to 12% lines require dual symbols: o GW -GM well- graded gravel with silt („) GW -GC well - graded gravel with clay v GP -GM poorly graded gravel with silt GP -GC poorly graded gravel with clay If fines classify as CL -ML, use dual symbol GC -GM or SC -SM. = g. If fines are organic, add "with organic lines" to group name. h. If soil contains 215 % gravel, add "with gravel" to group name. i. Sands with 5 to 12% lines require dual symbols: m SW -SM well - graded sand with silt SW -SC well - graded sand with Gay . SP -SM poorly graded sand with silt SP -SC poorly graded sand with clay j. If Atterberg limits plot in hatched area, soil is a CL -ML, silty clay. k. It soil contains 15 to 29% plus No. 200, add "with sand" or "with gravel" whichever is predominant I. If soil contains 2 30% plus No. 200, predominantly sand, add "sandy" to group name. m. If soil contains a 30% plus No. 200 predominantly gravel, add "gravelly" to group name. n. PI 2 4 and plots on or above "A" line. o. PI < 4 or plots below "A" line. p. PI plots on or above "A" line. q. PI plots below "A" line. 601 50 ^ 40 a X 30 C v20 y tD Q_ 10 7 4 0 - —I - - —r- — 1 No. 10 to No. 40 Fine . ............................... i -- rr- ----I- Rather stiff . ............................... �T- Clay .......................... <No. 26Q, PI _ 4 and Very stiff ..... ............................... on or abov,.� "A" line Hard......... ............................... over 30 BPF ' v J X>O G i i G\'o MH MH or OH LrOH u 10 16 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Liquid Limit (LL) Laboratory Tests DD Dry density, pcf OC Organic content, % WD Wet density, pcf S Percent of saturation, % MC Natural moisture content, % SG Specific gravity LL Liqiuid limit, % C Cohesion, psf PL Plastic limit, % 0 Angle of internal friction PI Plasticity index, % qu Unconfined compressive strength, psf P2000 % passing 200 sieve qp Pocket penetrometer strength, tsf Particle Size Identification Boulders .:............................ over 12" Cobbles ............................... 3" to 12" Gravel Coarse ............................ 3/4" to 3" Fine .. ............................... No. 4 to 3/4" Sand Coarse ............................ No. 4 to No. 10 Medium ........................... No. 10 to No. 40 Fine . ............................... No. 40 to No. 200 Silt ....... ............................... <No. 200, PI <4 or Rather stiff . ............................... below "A" iine Clay .......................... <No. 26Q, PI _ 4 and Very stiff ..... ............................... on or abov,.� "A" line Relative Density of Cohesionless Soils Very loose .. ............................... 0 to 4 F. PF Loose ......... ............................... 5 to 10 "PF Medium dense .......................... 11 to 3 ;) BPF Dense ........ ............................... 31 to 50 BPF Very dense . ............................... over 50 BPF Consistency of Cohesive Sc;! Very soft ...... ..............................0 to 1 BPF Soft......... ............................... 2 to 3 BPF Rather soft .. ..............................4 to 5 BPF Medium ....... ..............................6 to 8 BPF Rather stiff . ............................... 9 to 12 BPF Stiff ............ .............................13 to 16 BPF Very stiff ..... ............................... 17 to 30 BPF Hard......... ............................... over 30 BPF Drilling Notes Standard penetration test borings were advanced by 30" or 60" ID hollow -stem augers unless noted otherwise, Jetting water was used to clean out auger prior to sampling only where indicated on logs. Standard penetration test borings are designated by the prefix "ST" (Split Tube). All samples were taken with the standard 2" OD split -tube sampler, ex- cept where noted. Power auger borings were advanced by 4" or 6" diameter continuous - flight, solid -stein augers. Soil classifications and strata depths were in- ferred from disturbed samples augered to the surface and are, therefore, somewhat approximate. Power auger borings are designated by the prefix "B." Hand auger borings were advanced manually with a 1 "' or 30" di2m- eter auger and were limited to the depth from which the auger could be manually vr'thdrawn. Hand auger borings are indicated by the prefix "H." BPF: Numbers indicate blows per foot recorded in standard penetration test, also known as "N" value. The sampler was set 6" into undisturbed soil below the hollow -stem auger. Driving resistances were then counted for second and third 6" increments and added to get BPF. Where they differed significantly, they are reported in the following form: 2112 for the second and third 6" increments, respectively. WH: WH indicates the sampler penetrated soil under weight of hammer and rods alone-, driving not required. WR: WR indicates the sampler penetrated soil under weight of rods alone: hammer weight and driving not required. TW indicates thin- walled (undisturbed) tube sample. Note: All tests were run in general accordance with applicable ASTM standards. BRAD FV I NTE RTEC Formally submit the encumbrances - _ exhibits support your request for a variance THE DISTRICT Condominiums +[(retail + [Restaurant t C--; CYPRESS EQUITIES FRA U� BFI on &Fa fellArchltecft An ARlliuc of 5U0m -h amd Sena n 10� 0 r.: 900! .ismciates. lnc. Alignment Required No Access Zone Utility Easement Utility. Sidewalk, and Landscape 'casement = eoesU+an ^innel Easement Setback `:-ansit Easement Cross- access Agreement Park Easement C CYPRESS EQUITIES An A1Titiste of Stau6scb Retail ser+i:es T Edina, Minnesota Scale: FRA � •tt]Itats Ft�k ��ns _- Asseti �1?s. Ix. Attachment 9a Good Fulton & Farrell Architects AM Fsmant " a 3,;? &W 300 orrT- szci r.z 0 Z u LL CYPRESs EQUITIES AnAMate ofliuubwh Rxtxffser.,fr.0 253'-9' Good Fultm & Farrell Architects A %ft 300 Z&3D1MZfFb Daft& To= 7M .-ALLOWABLE" BUILDABLE ENVELOP FRANCE AVENU SOUTH ALLOWABLE,-' BUILDABLE ENVELOP 0 Z u LL CYPRESs EQUITIES AnAMate ofliuubwh Rxtxffser.,fr.0 253'-9' 20' THE DS��C T Edina, Minnesota MFRA acomh Fmk ones I Assodal3s. Inc. AttacHmentr9b .- Good Fultm & Farrell Architects aW Fwrrt Shd 214$ Mild %ft 300 Z&3D1MZfFb Daft& To= 7M .-ALLOWABLE" BUILDABLE ENVELOP FRANCE AVENU SOUTH 20' THE DS��C T Edina, Minnesota MFRA acomh Fmk ones I Assodal3s. Inc. AttacHmentr9b .- Good Fultm & Farrell Architects aW Fwrrt Shd 214$ Mild %ft 300 Z&3D1MZfFb Daft& To= 7M Af C CYPRE5s EQUITIES THE DISTRICT Edina, Minnesota OP T 2351-ON Building that meets existing zoning w/ current program FRQ I -- Its FYaak 3ws MUCIONS. hC. Attachment 9c Good Fulton & Farrell Architects 10C I CYPRESs EQUITHS knAMaic of.Suubar–h Rcuff ScnIrr-4 16 400 -A F -1 THE DISTRICT Edina, Minnesota MFRA Neramts Frant. Aun� Associat-->. ow. Attachment 9d Good Fulton & Farrell Architects M fww� 3+w 214301600/Tel sulb 300 2143031530,1F. D", T— 75201 —ift- CYPRESS EQUITIES An ALlWate of Suubach Retail Services THE DISTRICT 11.� \j Edina, Minnesota r NFRA &S W UMes. tic, Attachment 9e Good Fulton & Farrell Architects 280E Fe.,,,,, t AM 21a.303.1500/To Sift 3EO Zia 303.1SU /Fe. Odw Toe 75M —OR- n r REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor: & City Council Agenda Item: II. B. o From: Planning Department Consent .❑ Information Only ❑ Date: May 16, 2006 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA '® To Council Subject: Action: ❑ Motion Final Plat Approval for ® Resolution Loring Manor 2na Addn ❑ Ordinance 6621 Normandale Road ❑ Discussion Recommendation: The Planning Commission recommends Final Plat approval subject to: • Subdivision Dedication Information Background: See attached Subdivision Dedication Report, Council °Minutes and Final Plat. ° o TO: FROM: Subdivision Subdivision No. 0=-0(ozz CdD21 IPI�'d. City Council Plannina Department Land Size: t nP,La� 1 - Land Value:_ *Z 00, OU U Date: +/20/0w ) The developer of this subdivision has been required to A. Grant an easement over part of the land B. Dedicate % of the land 4C. Donate $ as a fee in lieu of land As a result of applying the following policy. A. Land required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 50A of land dedicated) 1. If property is adjacent to an eAsting park or playground and the addition beneficially expands the park or playground. 2. If property is six acres or will be combined with future dedications so that the end result will be a minimum of a six acre park. 3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream or wetland then protected by state or federal law. 4. If property is necessary for storm water holding or will be dredged or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds. 5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or historic value. B. Cash Required 1. In all other instances than above. Minutes/Edina City Council/February 21, 2006 very reliable contractors and hope to be running their facility by June of 2006 and then later to move to Phase Two which would add classrooms eventually housing a private school for grades two through eight. Mayor Hovland called for public comment. No .one appeared to comment. Member Swenson made a motion closing the public hearing, seconded by Member Masica. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson made a motion introducing the following resolution ,and moving its approval granting the Final Development Plan for Rink Properties - 7300 Bush Lake Road. RESOLUTION NO. 2006-24 APPROVING FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN RINK PROPERTIES 7300 BUSH LAKE ROAD BE IT RESOLVED by the'City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain Final Development Plan for 7300 Bush Lake Road presented by Rink Properties LLC, at the regular meeting of the City Council on February 21, 2006, be and is hereby granted Final Development Plan approval. Passed and adopted by the Edina City Council this 21s' day of February, 2006. Member Masica seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -25 APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR LORING MANOR 2ND ADDITION - 6621 NORMANDALE ROAD Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen explained the subject property was a developed single dwelling lot containing an area of 60,044 square feet. He said the existing home was located approximately mid lot. Mr. Larsen said the property was accessed by Normandale Road adjacent to Highway 100. He said the proponents intended to remove the existing house to allow construction of two new homes on the two separate lots. Mr. Larsen stated the following were the median size and dimensions of lots within 500 feet of the subject property. Median Lots Parameters - 500 Feet Width Dejth Area 98.4 feet 174.1 feet 17,573 square feet Proposed Lots Parameters' Lot 1 92.5 feet 367.38 feet 33,777 square feet Lot 2 . 92.5 feet 368.18 feet 34,267 square feet Mr. Larsen said the two new lots would need a 5.9 foot lot width variance. Page 15 Minutes/Edina Cif Council/February 21, 2006 Mr. Larsen reported the Planning Commission unanimously recommended the City Council grant the requested preliminary plat including the lot width variances, subject to Final Plat and subdivision dedication. Member Swenson asked if there were variances expected to be needed when future owners were building their houses in lightof the lot width variances needed for the subdivision. Mr. Larsen replied that there should be no reason for a variance to build a house on either lot. Mayor Hovland called for public comment. No one appeared to comment. Member Masica made a motion closing the public hearing seconded by Member Swenson. Rollcall: , Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2006-25 - APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR LORING MANOR SECOND. ADDITION 6621 NORMANDALE ROAD BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled, "LORING MANOR SECOND ADDITION ", platted by Robert Engstrom Companies, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council on February 21, 2006, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval. Passed and adopted by the Edina City Council this 21st day of February, 2006. Member Housh seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -23 APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR FREY'S NORTH ADDITION Planner Larsen reminded the Council that Preliminary Plat Approval had been granted on. January 17, 2006, on Frey's North Addition, 5201 Schaefer Road. He noted the subdivision dedication proposed was based upon an unimproved land value of $610,000.00 After a brief discussion, Member Hulbert introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption subject to Subdivision Dedication in the amount of $48,800.00: RESOLUTION NO. 2005-23 APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR FREY'S NORTH ADDITION 5201 SCHAEFER ROAD BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled, "FREY'S NORTH ADDITION ", platted by John E. Kyllo and Carol Kyllo, husband and wife and fee owners, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council on February 21, 2006, be and is hereby granted final plat approval subject to a Subdivision Dedication in the amount of $48,800.00. . Passed and adopted by the Edina City Council this 21st day of February, 2006. Page 16 Ir -rv1^T --p r -n LORING HAVVOR 2%B! I 36— signed by Its paper offlar this day of _ _ , 2006. I I I — — — — — — z R fsurea • u1sllY GImO/T STATE Or LaNNE50TA `�, I I � I , COUNTY The Iregoarg hsbumenf be/ this IVI^ ens acknoNadgad me _ day of 2008, by of Robert Engstrom Companln, o Minnesota crporofkn, an behalf I 4- Notary Publlt Counfy, My Cammhslan EPies laic I herebyy rff/y that /haw enrwysd and platted Ns property d�aerbsd an this pot as LCRWC MANOR 2ND AODI17 . that this plot Is o correct represntafM of said savvy, that a distances on carecfly ahem an the plot h Iasi and hundredths of a foot that as mawmnfs hove ben crrecUy placed in the ground as sham,• that the Outside botm /inn re correctly designated an the plot and that there am no rot Inds as defined h Minnesota Sfolufn 50102 Sibd 1 r public h/gheep to be designated an the plot. I. 1 Nord Land Saw�yoorr Uk-10 Lkenee Na 12IJJ �q ro COUNTY OF <. v r fie foregoing Fstrumenf was ack— ledged berm me this day of 2006, by Lee J I Ip �g N89�0'0.TE — J878B-- - al -�I c> Q= II .i ;ar to IMF 2 � I x I��I 2 slAet4Q f UTU G504OFT Y ern I fOL I I• Ir -rv1^T --p r -n LORING HAVVOR 2%B! zov KNOW ALL YEN BY THESE PRESENTS fiat Robert fnpatran Canpanh; o YMnafo eorpraflan, I other of the fonehq descrbed properly sRuate Jr, the Canty of HnnapF, Stofe o/ YMesof4 to e1L' Lot 4, Block 1, Lla/ng Manor, except that pelf thereof shkh Iles 9tslMy of o the run P"Iff with and distant 30 fasl Eesfady of Line .I desabsd belay Line 1. Felon o pohf an the West lire of Section JO iomshb 28 North. Range 24 ptst distant 2a87 fast Nwth of the W"t Outer comer thereof, run Emtedy of an angle of 85 degrees Ott mhufes 19 seconds hem sore —1 section lank (measured ftm —Ill ro cent) M 134.32 ise f to the point of b ghnhg of Lhe r to be doe~ thence de8ecf to the right at an ante of 86 degrees GO minutes 00 key Aar 4.3 feet thence deflect to the right an a c—e hoA79 a rafts of 16a72 fast (delta ante 40 degrees 00 mbwtes OO seconds) for 117.79 feet Name duflecl to the left an weave heft a rodts of 22100 reef (delta mgrs J9 degrees 02 huts. 02 —d,) fr IM29 fM; thence eeflecf to fie left an'a DO degree JO marute 12 secand — (delta ante 01 degree 29 minutes 34 seconds) fr 2 96.55 feet thence an folgnl to said curve for 137.24 / f and (here frmhafhg. and• Me South 85 feel of the ffnt 75 feel of Let 2. the Wnf 75 feet of Lot J: Block 1, Lring Mann. Nes caused the some to be srwyee and platted as LOPING MANOR 2ND ADDITION and does hereby donate and deekole to the public M public use forever the easements for drainage and utility purposes as shore on Mb plat. N89 36— signed by Its paper offlar this day of _ _ , 2006. I I I — — — — — — z ` fsurea • u1sllY GImO/T zov KNOW ALL YEN BY THESE PRESENTS fiat Robert fnpatran Canpanh; o YMnafo eorpraflan, I other of the fonehq descrbed properly sRuate Jr, the Canty of HnnapF, Stofe o/ YMesof4 to e1L' Lot 4, Block 1, Lla/ng Manor, except that pelf thereof shkh Iles 9tslMy of o the run P"Iff with and distant 30 fasl Eesfady of Line .I desabsd belay Line 1. Felon o pohf an the West lire of Section JO iomshb 28 North. Range 24 ptst distant 2a87 fast Nwth of the W"t Outer comer thereof, run Emtedy of an angle of 85 degrees Ott mhufes 19 seconds hem sore —1 section lank (measured ftm —Ill ro cent) M 134.32 ise f to the point of b ghnhg of Lhe r to be doe~ thence de8ecf to the right at an ante of 86 degrees GO minutes 00 key Aar 4.3 feet thence deflect to the right an a c—e hoA79 a rafts of 16a72 fast (delta ante 40 degrees 00 mbwtes OO seconds) for 117.79 feet Name duflecl to the left an weave heft a rodts of 22100 reef (delta mgrs J9 degrees 02 huts. 02 —d,) fr IM29 fM; thence eeflecf to fie left an'a DO degree JO marute 12 secand — (delta ante 01 degree 29 minutes 34 seconds) fr 2 96.55 feet thence an folgnl to said curve for 137.24 / f and (here frmhafhg. and• Me South 85 feel of the ffnt 75 feel of Let 2. the Wnf 75 feet of Lot J: Block 1, Lring Mann. Nes caused the some to be srwyee and platted as LOPING MANOR 2ND ADDITION and does hereby donate and deekole to the public M public use forever the easements for drainage and utility purposes as shore on Mb plat. N89 36— signed by Its paper offlar this day of _ _ , 2006. — - - — — — — — — z ` fsurea • u1sllY GImO/T STATE Or LaNNE50TA `�, I I � I , COUNTY The Iregoarg hsbumenf be/ this IVI^ ens acknoNadgad me _ day of 2008, by of Robert Engstrom Companln, o Minnesota crporofkn, an behalf I I — Notary Publlt Counfy, My Cammhslan EPies I herebyy rff/y that /haw enrwysd and platted Ns property d�aerbsd an this pot as LCRWC MANOR 2ND AODI17 . that this plot Is o correct represntafM of said savvy, that a distances on carecfly ahem an the plot h Iasi and hundredths of a foot that as mawmnfs hove ben crrecUy placed in the ground as sham,• that the Outside botm /inn re correctly designated an the plot and that there am no rot Inds as defined h Minnesota Sfolufn 50102 Sibd 1 r public h/gheep to be designated an the plot. I. 1 Nord Land Saw�yoorr Uk-10 Lkenee Na 12IJJ STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF <. v r fie foregoing Fstrumenf was ack— ledged berm me this day of 2006, by Lee J I I . ar Loma uAwe �� ��•: sang Le'Z or Oar ;"' • soar c lalwa 1unne•;_�e •• ---- - - - - -- N89�0'0.TE — J878B-- - I - - - -I _ _ ___ to L 2 2 slAet4Q f UTU G504OFT — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — I---------- n ........ __._ — — — — 6 ' S8950103'W JM49 Al _) Iv. , T-AI ^/lAl L�L_1 V..: VIV ATY- IT1/VAI AOLJ, 11%./ zov KNOW ALL YEN BY THESE PRESENTS fiat Robert fnpatran Canpanh; o YMnafo eorpraflan, I other of the fonehq descrbed properly sRuate Jr, the Canty of HnnapF, Stofe o/ YMesof4 to e1L' Lot 4, Block 1, Lla/ng Manor, except that pelf thereof shkh Iles 9tslMy of o the run P"Iff with and distant 30 fasl Eesfady of Line .I desabsd belay Line 1. Felon o pohf an the West lire of Section JO iomshb 28 North. Range 24 ptst distant 2a87 fast Nwth of the W"t Outer comer thereof, run Emtedy of an angle of 85 degrees Ott mhufes 19 seconds hem sore —1 section lank (measured ftm —Ill ro cent) M 134.32 ise f to the point of b ghnhg of Lhe r to be doe~ thence de8ecf to the right at an ante of 86 degrees GO minutes 00 key Aar 4.3 feet thence deflect to the right an a c—e hoA79 a rafts of 16a72 fast (delta ante 40 degrees 00 mbwtes OO seconds) for 117.79 feet Name duflecl to the left an weave heft a rodts of 22100 reef (delta mgrs J9 degrees 02 huts. 02 —d,) fr IM29 fM; thence eeflecf to fie left an'a DO degree JO marute 12 secand — (delta ante 01 degree 29 minutes 34 seconds) fr 2 96.55 feet thence an folgnl to said curve for 137.24 / f and (here frmhafhg. and• Me South 85 feel of the ffnt 75 feel of Let 2. the Wnf 75 feet of Lot J: Block 1, Lring Mann. Nes caused the some to be srwyee and platted as LOPING MANOR 2ND ADDITION and does hereby donate and deekole to the public M public use forever the easements for drainage and utility purposes as shore on Mb plat. N 0 30 60 90 1. .11 !I—M" SCALE IN FEET BEARINGS SHOVN ARE ASSUMED • DENOTES CAST IRON MONUMENT b DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT O DENOTES 112 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT SET AND MARKED BY LICENSE NO. 22033 Net- Public, _ County My Com i.- EPir- EDINA, MINNESOTA fih plot of LOPING MANOR 2ND AD01779V •as approwd and =soled by tin Uf0 Cwnc9 of Edina YFnewfo of o err.r mnfkiq thereof held this __ day of IOOa rI oypfic.61% the wrlffe, commnN 0 recommendatlons of the CommhsMr of TMspotaflan and the Canty Highmy EngFeer how ben received by the City or the prescribed JO day prod has elapsed elthouf —Of of such comments and recommendation; as prodded by Mbnefofo Statutes, Section 50104 Subd 2. CITY COUNCIL OF EDNA. MINNESOTA by Mayor by _ Manager TAXPAYER SERVICES DIVISION Hennepin County Minnesota I hereby crtfry that tasks payable h _ and prim yeas how been Peal f land descrbed an this Plat. Doted this day of _ . 2006. Patrick H O'Connor, Hennepin County Au0,tr by Deputy SURVEY SECRON Herneph Canty MMesoto Pursuant to MINK STAT. Sec JSW..565 (19691 this &I has been Ippmwd this _ day of Mken P. Bro.rn, Hennepin County Suwyr by REf2STRAR OF RILES Hnneph C—ty, Mhnsroto 1 hereby certify that the elfish plot of CORING MANOR 2ND ADNRON eas lied F this office this _ day of 2006 of _ .,clock — Y. MIMoel H. LLnnllf, Reglafrr of Ofles by , Deputy EGA J% FIELD, & NOW AK, M. I SUR+VEVOING M eifnen rhereaf said Robert Engstrom Canpanh; o ethnesola coparalion has c—of these presents to he signed by Its paper offlar this day of _ _ , 2006. Robert Engstrom Campan/ss z STATE Or LaNNE50TA COUNTY The Iregoarg hsbumenf be/ this IVI^ ens acknoNadgad me _ day of 2008, by of Robert Engstrom Companln, o Minnesota crporofkn, an behalf of the comp —Mon. — Notary Publlt Counfy, My Cammhslan EPies I herebyy rff/y that /haw enrwysd and platted Ns property d�aerbsd an this pot as LCRWC MANOR 2ND AODI17 . that this plot Is o correct represntafM of said savvy, that a distances on carecfly ahem an the plot h Iasi and hundredths of a foot that as mawmnfs hove ben crrecUy placed in the ground as sham,• that the Outside botm /inn re correctly designated an the plot and that there am no rot Inds as defined h Minnesota Sfolufn 50102 Sibd 1 r public h/gheep to be designated an the plot. I. 1 Nord Land Saw�yoorr Uk-10 Lkenee Na 12IJJ STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF fie foregoing Fstrumenf was ack— ledged berm me this day of 2006, by Lee J Nord Land S—y., Yhnesofa Lkanss NO 220-0 N 0 30 60 90 1. .11 !I—M" SCALE IN FEET BEARINGS SHOVN ARE ASSUMED • DENOTES CAST IRON MONUMENT b DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT O DENOTES 112 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT SET AND MARKED BY LICENSE NO. 22033 Net- Public, _ County My Com i.- EPir- EDINA, MINNESOTA fih plot of LOPING MANOR 2ND AD01779V •as approwd and =soled by tin Uf0 Cwnc9 of Edina YFnewfo of o err.r mnfkiq thereof held this __ day of IOOa rI oypfic.61% the wrlffe, commnN 0 recommendatlons of the CommhsMr of TMspotaflan and the Canty Highmy EngFeer how ben received by the City or the prescribed JO day prod has elapsed elthouf —Of of such comments and recommendation; as prodded by Mbnefofo Statutes, Section 50104 Subd 2. CITY COUNCIL OF EDNA. MINNESOTA by Mayor by _ Manager TAXPAYER SERVICES DIVISION Hennepin County Minnesota I hereby crtfry that tasks payable h _ and prim yeas how been Peal f land descrbed an this Plat. Doted this day of _ . 2006. Patrick H O'Connor, Hennepin County Au0,tr by Deputy SURVEY SECRON Herneph Canty MMesoto Pursuant to MINK STAT. Sec JSW..565 (19691 this &I has been Ippmwd this _ day of Mken P. Bro.rn, Hennepin County Suwyr by REf2STRAR OF RILES Hnneph C—ty, Mhnsroto 1 hereby certify that the elfish plot of CORING MANOR 2ND ADNRON eas lied F this office this _ day of 2006 of _ .,clock — Y. MIMoel H. LLnnllf, Reglafrr of Ofles by , Deputy EGA J% FIELD, & NOW AK, M. I SUR+VEVOING rf N v 0 owe 1A (n 0 .f hcoR�e .ck° REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Planning Department Date: May 16, 2006 Subject: Final Rezoning for Brownstones on France Noonan Const. /Kingdom Properties „Agenda Item: II. C. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action: ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: The Planning Commission recommends Final Rezoning subject to: • Watershed District Permits • Developer's Agreement Final Plat Information' Background: See attached Planning and Engineering memos and meeting minutes. I Z -06 -2 Final Rezoning and Final Plat Brownstones on France 5200 France Avenue Ms. Aaker informed the Commission the City Council approved Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Plat appfovalfor brownstones on France at their March 21, 2006, meeting. f Ms. Aaker said the proponents revised their site plan and exterior elevations remain essentially the same as in the,originarpian with th exceptipn of a reduction in surface parking, the addition offa sidewalk -along West 2nd Street, replacement of boulevard sidewalk along-France Avenue and a slight modification in window type used in the building. \ Ms. Aaker explained it was parking be reduced. Surface parki proposed 20. The sidewalk along' boulevard sidewalk along France Engineer. Ms. Aaker conclw and Preliminary Plat sub, Agreement and Watersh Ed at pasfineetings that,gurface ,,at instead of the originally Street -and replacement of the 51 at;fhe suggestion of the City upports the proposal for Preliminary Rezoning ial Rezoning, ,Final-Plat approval, Developer's \oermits. present. Corpmissio6or rown Said he re Ils/the discussion suggesting a reduction in surface peA qg; however, questioned if this reduction could result in the under parking of this site. Ms. Aaker responded even at 15 spaces the P oject reec ains "over parked" by Ordinance standards. She pointed out the pro ect includes two underground` parking stalls per unit. Commissioner Fischer complimented the proponent on the design of the project and the\use of 4uality exterior materials. Commissioner Fischer noted the only "tick" he sees, in the plan is that he would like to see the garage door screened a bit more: Commissioner Schroeder echoed Commissioner Fischer sentiments but questioned the "bump out" around the utility poles to accommodate the sidewalk. Commissioner Schroeder suggested that the sidewalk be located where it belongs, adding in his opinion the sidewalk jog to accommodate the poles isn't pleasing. Concluding, Commissioner Schroeder suggested moving the poles or burying the utilities. Chair Lonsbury stated he believes the reason the sidewalk was located in that area was to move pedestrian traffic away from vehicle traffic along France Avenue. Mr. Ed Noonan, 84 Woodland Circle, Edina, and informed them small changes were made to th Staff, the Council and Commission. With graphics change in window type, the addition of more limest slate roofs, etc., adding in his opinion these additio. building(s). Continuing, Mr. Noonan said thee, lace the request of the City Engineer, adding he believe pose a problem. Mr. Noonan explained the county" this development and this courtyard area has been landscaping. Mr. Noonan said in response to Con comments about the screening of the garage door - pointed out the proposed landscaping that will scre Noonan said his goal was to create a;time)ess fuel Commissioner Schroeder a plans. Ms. Aaker responded Ter e F plans.. Commissioner Schroe c plans indicate the planting of AshJ Commissioner Schroeder; §aid ma Ash trees because of blight. Conti that the City Forester review -the le refer the to addressed/,the Commission e plan at ttie r "uest of City 114,r.'NQonan pointed out the one, Oindow ba�s� copper, ns insert mb�e character to,-tb ment 9fi the sidewalk was ate s the `utility poles should n ird area`is the "front'yard for ,dhhanced \ith additional imissioner Fis6hees With graphics Mr. Noonan erg -the door \. ",concluding, Mr. to the proiect. -ked Mt. Aakef who reviews the landscaping lanning Department revidws all landscaping ommented it appears t him the landscaping gees, adding he is worried about Ash trees. iy communitles are'not allowing the planting of riuing, Commissioner Schroeder suggested ncfsc�aping plan. Ms. Aaker responded she will itv Forester for his comments. Com! rnissioner,Stauntor�questione if this hearing is the final review. it Lonsbury respondd this review is final. He added certain items are em�nted at the building permit level and in the Developer's Agreement, but is the,last time the Commission will review this plan. `Commissioner Workinger told the Commission for the last few months the Commission has been discussing affordable housing, adding he is taking this opportunity to,advocale forpffordable housing by asking developers to find ways to help the City achieve more affordable housing. Commissioner Workinger acknowledged this may hot be the proper place for affordable housing; however, every opportunity the Commission has to enlighten not only the City but developers that more affordable housing is needed in Edina is of benefit. Concluding, Commissioner Workinger stated in his opinion this is a very good plan. Commissioner Fischer informed the Commission tomorrow, April 27 the Affordable Housing Task Force will unveil their draft to the public. Commissioner Fischer acknowledged there is a growing sentiment in the community that affordable or work force housing needs to be maintained and added to. Concluding, Commissioner Fischer reiterated the excellent quality of the project. Commissioner Brown moved to recommend Fin gIRezoning and Final Plat approval subject to Watershed District permits and De er' reement. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. All vote o i carried. Memo To: Members of the Planning Commission From Kris Aaker, Assistant Planner OW CC: File Date: 4/21/2006 Re: Final Rezoning and Final Plat Approval for Brownstones on France The City Council approved Preliminary Rezoning, Preliminary Plat and Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for Brownstones on France at their March 21, 2006, meeting. The attached revised site plan and exterior elevations remain essentially the same as in the original plan with the exception of a reduction in surface parking, the addition of a sidewalk along West 52nd Street, replacement of boulevard sidewalk along France Avenue, and a slight modification in window type used in the building. It was suggested that surface parking be reduced. The surface parking has been modified from 20 to 15 surface stalls. The sidewalk installation along West 52 "d Street and replacement of boulevard sidewalk along France Avenue was at the suggestion of the City Engineer. Minutes/Edina City Council/March 21, 2006 Member Masica asked Mr. Gageby how he became aware of the subject pro rty. Mr. Gageby noted one of the properties wa own as Diamond's in the Rough. The co y was solicited by the family to buy the property t had been on the market for some time. Member Housh asked if the r son this was before the Council wa there was an encroachment involved. He questioned how the ity safeguards against this happe g again. Mr. Larsen said many times landscaping was not inclu d in the scope of the projec Member Housh asked if the contractor/ landscaper has any liab 'ty to fix the encroachment. Larsen said it lies with the property owners. Mayor Hovland inquired how the land tr e agreement was r ched. Mr. Gageby said Daniel Spiegel and his counsel came up with what they nsidered tVbe fair and re asonable option rather than removing all the extensive landscaping. Ma r Hovlad if there was a better way to address the shared driveway issue. Mr. Larsen said he lieved s the only way to deal with the issue. Public Comment Andrew Parker, representing Daniel Spiegel of the ability to maintain his landscaping. Member Masica made a motion, seconded by �Jat ber Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hod Motion carried. Member Masica made a motion conditioned upon: 1) Final Plat Access: GAGEBY BE IT RESOLVED by the C entitled, " GAGEBY ESTATES ", p meeting of the City Council on Ma with the following conditions: 19 View Road, requested that his client have !g the following 2) Subdivision to close the public hearing. 5 LUTION NO. 2006-36 PRELIMINARY PLAT NRI '-7 ATES, 7108 VALLEY VIEW :ouncil of the City of EdinaA by ERS Development L, 21, 2006, be and is hereby granted kl Plat Approval; 2) Subdivision ] and moving its adoption and 3) Shared Driveway that that certain plat ented at the. regular ninary plat approval ition; and 3) Shared Driveway Access. Passed and adopted by t e Edina City Council this 21st day of March, 2006. Member Housh seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2006- 37 AND ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 850-A.28 ADOPTED APPROVING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PRELIMINARY PLAT AND PRELIMINARY REZONING FROM R -1 SINGLE FAMILY TO PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT 3 FOR 5300 FRANCE AVENUE Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Mr. Larsen stated the proposal was a request to rezone the northerly 2.2 acres of the Calvary Church parking lot located at 5300 France Avenue from R -1 to PRD -3, for the approval of a change to the City's Comprehensive Plan from Quasi Public to Lot Density Attached Residential, and approval of the Preliminary Plat for Brownstone Estates, which would allow the proponent to construct 20 Page 7 Minutes/Edina City Council/March 21, 2006 attached townhomes on the site. He said Calvary currently occupied the former Grace Church location and they do not need the entire property. Mr. Larsen explained that under Edina regulations churches must provide parking at a rate of one space for each three seats in the largest assembly plus additional parking to support concurrent activities. He said Calvary has 875 seats, requiring a minim of 292 spaces. Mr. Larsen said the church would be left with 330 spaces after detaching the subject property. consisting of 2.2 acres. Mr. Larsen said the proposed development was for a U- shaped building containing twenty multi level units with a common underground parking garage. However, each unit has two stalls plus a storage unit would be secured by an individual garage door with additional parking provided in the common area outside the individual units. Mr. Larsen said the project would be served by a single curb cut located on West 52nd Street. He added that individual units would range from 3,100 square feet to 3,400 square feet on two floors with each unit having an individual elevator. Mr. Larsen said the City's PRD -3 district would require 73,000 square feet for twenty units and that the proposed site contained approximately 94,500 square feet. He said parking would be required at a rate of two spaces per unit and was provided at two plus spaces under the building and 19 surface spaces adjacent to 52nd Street. Mr. Larsen explained the Zoning Ordinances required 35 feet of setback from streets and the rear property line and 20 feet of setback from an interior property line. He said the proposed plan requested set back variances between 25-27 feet from France Avenue , to 15 feet from the southerly property line and to between 19 -29 feet from the westerly property line. Mr. Larsen reported the Planning Commission recommended the Council grant the requested rezoning and approvals including the variances. He said the Planning Commission found the hardship to be the unusual shape of the property, its relationship to the existing Church parking lot and the historical way the Zoning Ordinance related. to the more urban areas of the City. Member Masica clarified that in the more urban area, the City has not historically been as stringent with setback requirements. Mr. Larsen said that was correct. Member Hulbert asked . if the setback in PRD -3 was fifty feet. Mr. Larsen explained the Zoning Ordinances required 35 feet of setback from streets and the rear property line and 20 feet of setback from an interior property line. She asked for clarification of the garages noting that the Planning Comm n ission minutes referred to a common underground garage, but Mr. Larse s report said in garage doors. Mr. Larsen said that tenants would have a single exterior garage door to access a drive aisle leading to individual garages for each of the twenty units. Member Masica asked if the church would remain conforming in its land area without the acreage . proposed to be sold for the re- development. Mr. Larsen replied yes, it would be conforming; retaining approximately 5.5 acres. Proponent Presentation Ed Noonan, Noonan Construction, 5400 France Avenue South, said he was bringing the proposal to the Council after working with staff and presenting to the Planning Commission. He used a graphic depiction illustrating the proposed townhome project. Mr. Noonan said that there was a great deal of mature landscaping and a berm installed by the former occupant Grace Church which he hoped to utilize. He pointed out that the lots on Halifax abutting his project were about 300 feet deep and Page 8 Minutesf Edina Ci!y Council/March 21, 2006 many were :buffered by mature trees 35 - 40 feet tall that would screen the homes from the new building. Mr. Noonan said that Brownstone on France was what he would be calling the proposed project. He said he would be both the developer and builder of the project. He pointed out how there would be an additional ten feet on the southerly edge of the property before the curb and gutter where a twenty-five foot drive aisle would connect the church's upper parking lot to its lower parking lot. He highlighted the existing berm along France Avenue and 52nd Avenue. He said they have tried to nestle a walkway into the existing berm. He said the Planning Commission had requested a reduction to fifteen surface parking spots on the north or 52nd Street side of the project which they have accommodated. Mr. Noonan pointed out how the walkway could be used to access the existing public sidewalk and then enter back to the private sidewalk and go into the center courtyard promenade. He said the center courtyard in the center of the U of the building was about 125 feet wide and about 80 feet deep. Mr. Noonan used the graphic to demonstrate where existing landscaping and berms existed and where new plantings and landscaping would be added. Mr. Noonan said that each-home would have a front yard and private entrance to their home from the courtyard. The center of the courtyard will hold a water feature and more garden type landscaping. He said that the units would range in size from the about 1500 square feet_ per level with the front units facing France Avenue and the inside corner units being the largest. Mr. Noonan said there would be one eighteen foot garage door visible to the public which would be about four feet below the level of West 52nd Street. : Residents will have an individual garage door to open inside the common area to access their unit. He said the additional parking along the common drive aisle would most likely be leased parking of residents. Mr. Noonan said inside the garage will be the car wash, pet wash along with garbage and recycling for residents. Additionally there would be emergency stair exits and ventilation. He said the units would be approximately 28 feet wide and that since the exterior walls of each unit were the only load bearing walls, it allowed for the residents to totally design the interior living space to their own desires. Mr. Noonan said that each unit has its own balcony. He said the exterior materials will be a combination of brick, stone, cladded windows, shake type roof system with copper reliefs on the dormers and entryways. Mr. Noonan said the exterior design will be firm when the final approvals were sought and he would provide exact materials at that time. He demonstrated with a graphic depiction how the proposed building would look from each elevation with and without the proposed and existing landscaping. Member Swenson asked the height of the building at the northwest corner. Mr. Noonan said that the mid roof . height was about, 35 feet and it would be about 44 feet at its highest point. He said the garage entrance would show an expanse of three stories from the door to the top of the roof. Member Swenson asked if the windows in the dormers constituted a third floor, because that there was no depiction of the third floor in the plans. Mr. Noonan said there was a third floor, and that the gables continued on both the front and back of the building, noting every unit would_ have the opportunity for a shed dormer and also have a shaped roof dormer available as an option. Member Swenson asked why the developer situated the building on the site so that a larger variance was required at the back property line and not the France Avenue side; and why the decision was made to exit the site onto 52nd Street. Mr. Noonan said the way the building was situated because of the topography' of the lots on Halifax and the distance that it was a natural fit to: the proposed building. He said the decision to access 52nd Street was a result of staff discussion at plan review and Page 9 Minutes/Edina City Council/March 21, 2006 from analyzing the results of the traffic study. He said that Bob Green, Alliant Traffic Engineer, was available to speak to the traffic issue. Member Swenson asked if it had ever been contemplated to exit the building onto France. Mr. Noonan said the 52nd Street curb cut was used because it was in existence and because of the topography of accessing the tuck -under garage. Member Swenson commented her belief that residents will not turn right onto 52nd Street to France, but would go left onto 52nd Street to Halifax. Bob Green, Alliant Traffic Engineer, briefly reviewed the study. He said that counts were taken in the AM and PM peak hours and on a Sunday morning peak exiting hour. He said they counted all the driveway entrances of the Church and at the intersection of France and 54th Street. He reported from 52nd Street the AM Peak was 40 vehicles per hour, the PM Peak was 26 vehicles per hour and the Sunday morning Peak was 23 vehicles per hour. He reported that onto 54th and France it was pretty light except for Sunday morning. Mr. Green said he used the ITE Trip Generation Manual, the standard use for studies in the industry that tells how many trips will be used per unit. He said with twenty units, in the course of a day 120 trips would be expected. During the peak hours either AM or PM ten trips could be expected. Mr. Green said the traffic as it would be redistributed was reviewed, with the Church using the two France and the 54th Street access and the townhomes using the 52nd Street access. He said the entrance at 52nd would drop down to less than ten vehicles per hour during any one of the three peak time periods, so that actually the 52nd Street traffic will drop because the church access has been eliminated. Mr. Green said bus traffic was also reviewed and they determined buses would be entering the Church site from 54th and circling around and back.out. He said they would be working to improve the France Avenue connection from the parking lot, but still believed that the 54th Street access would be used for buses. Concluding, Mr. Green said that based on his analysis of the data the levels of service would not be significantly changed -__- - - Mayor Hovland asked if when the counts had been performed whether it was noted what direction the traffic was destined that was exiting the site or from which direction traffic came that had entered the site. Mr. Green said that part of the data had not been collected because they were simply an attempt to find out the volumes at that entrance. Mayor Hovland commented that persons exiting the townhomes garage would use Halifax as suggested by Member Swenson. He said it would have been good to have known how many of the drivers already using the site followed that same pattern. Mayor Hovland asked for more detail on the amount of parking left for the church after the townhomes were built. Mr. Green said that after the project was completed there would be approximately 327 spaces left for the church. He said the day of their count the attendance at the church was 295 persons with 144 stalls occupied. Mr. Green said that based upon data from Calvary, their average attendance was a little higher around 400 which would be using 200 spaces. With 327 spaces on site there would be approximately 127 more spaces than needed. He said that based on City roads one space was required for each 3 seats in the church. Mayor Hovland asked if during the neighborhood meeting any further landscaping was discussed especially on. the Halifax side of the property and asked about a sidewalk plan as recommended by the Transportation Commission on the France and 52nd Street sides of the building. Mr. Noonan said that the neighbors who talked to him were fine with the proposal as it existed. He said that they were just at the Transportation Commission meeting last week and their thoughts on the issue were that they were willing to work .with the City, but installing sidewalks would take out the entire berm and mature trees. He said the sidewalks do not exist between 44th and Crosstown so why would this area be so important to create a sidewalk. Mr. Noonan expressed concern about what type of landscape Page 10 Minutes/Edina City Council/March 21, 2006 materials that would grow with the amount of salt used on France Avenue. He said they would work with staff, but would like to find a compromise that could preserve the mature trees and berm if possible. Member Swenson asked about a sidewalk along 52nd Street. Mr. Noonan said they would work with the City, but that the same concerns existed on 52nd that existed on France. Member Hulbert asked if any additional landscaping was planned for the Halifax side of the property. Mr. Noonan pointed out that many of the mature trees were on the proposed site and not on the neighbor's property. Mayor Hovland asked if there was an elevation change between the Halifax properties and the subject property. Mr. Noonan said the garage floor would be at the same level as the current parking lot. Member Masica asked if the dormers depicted on the proposed building would be. optional. Mr. Noonan said the dormers would be built into the project, but finishing the interior of the dormers would be optional Steven Hall, Kingdom Properties, representing Calvary Church, said that Calvary Church has been in existence for about forty years. He said they were at 4900 France and were outgrowing the facility. Mr. Hall said they have been in the current location about three years and found that they were not using the entire parking lot. He said that based upon the church they believed good stewardship would tell them to do something different than paying a mortgage on property not used. Mr. Hall reported that the entire- church was supportive of the _project. He said that adequate parking still existed on the property retained by the church. Calculating parking on one space for three sanctuary seats they would have about 100 excess spaces. Member Swenson asked if some of their parking was leased to the car service center off of 54th. Mr. Hall said it was not leased but they did allow them to park in the church lot during the week and most likely in the future they would be more likely to police that usage. Member Hulbert asked if this property was the off -site parking for the Haugland development. Member Housh said he thought the construction workers were parking there at the present time. Mr. Hall said that the workers were parking on the 54th and France portion of their lot. Mayor Hovland asked about the Calvin Christian School the Berry Patch child care, or Calvary Church potential growth. Mr. Hall said it was a middle school, grade sixth through eighth and would have an 80 student maximum since the rest of the school was housed elsewhere. He said that Berry Patch was almost at its maximum, but if it grew in size that would impact traffic, but not parking. Mr. Hall said that it was hoped the church would grow to 700 members. If they achieve 500 members they would begin holding two services separated by a significant amount of time. Public Comment Mark Johnson, 5007 Arden Avenue, expressed concern regarding the traffic impact on Arden Avenue. He said that 52nd turned onto Arden at the Park and the proponent traffic study did not address that impact. He asked the Council not to authorize the rezoning because he feared it would set a precedent and ultimately there will be twenty unit townhouse developments all the way down France. Page 11 Minutes/Edina City Council/March 21, 2006 Pamela Mahood, 5129 Indianola, said she believed the project would be a tremendous addition to the neighborhood. She said she would rather'see a berm with landscaping instead of a sidewalk. Tracy Streckenbach, 5124 Halifax, stated she was familiar with Mr. Noonan s work and it would be a positive addition to the neighborhood, but she expressed concern about traffic on Halifax and parking overflowing into the neighborhood. She said she thought a sidewalk was need on Halifax to 50th and Halifax to 54th. Harold Halverson, 5217 Halifax, said that Grace Church took out 17 residences along France. Avenue, and then raised the elevation on their property so it now drained onto the Halifax neighbors back yards. He also asked what the addresses would be on the project. Mr. Noonan said the addresses would be' 5200 -5238 France Avenue. Mary Balogh, 5204 Halifax, expressed concern about drainage to adjacent property, height too high, keeping the setback at 30 feet, traffic concerns (limit left turns in and out directing traffic onto France), and sidewalks. Ms. Balogh asked that traffic to be controlled instead of building more sidewalks. Drew Hoag, 5136 Gorgas, said that he would see entirely too much building from his property. He asked if the units were townhouses or condos. Mr. Hoag asked that single family homes be brought back because this was not the place for townhouses. He said that the old trees on site will be lots and the neighbors will have no buffer when the trees were gone. Jeff Huggett, 4008 Wood End Drive, commented that he did not believe there was any shortage of high priced luxury housing. He suggested that the developer be required to supply affordable housing and the City provide the developer with something of value for doing so. Mayor Hovland asked the developer to speak to the affordable housing issue. Mr. Noonan said the land was too expensive to support affordable housing. Member Hulbert asked what was the basis for the requested variance. Perhaps the developers should be required to only build 18 units. Molly Schomburg, 5329 Halifax, stated she approved of the project and that the traffic has existed in the area for years and would not be greatly impacted by the project.. Bert Mcdonough, 5213 Halifax, said he had an issue with the property line with the church. He said from his property no trees buffer him and he will be seeing a forty foot building. Mr. Noonan said there will be a setback from the property line between 16 -29 feet with extensive landscaping. Marty Sorlien, 5209 France Avenue, said she lived on the Minneapolis side of France. She said she did not receive a notice because it was sent to the City of Minneapolis and they never forwarded it to her. She said she has been a twenty year resident and felt that the project would negatively impact her hair salon and cause traffic issues. Dave Sandberg, 5104 Halifax, said traffic has increased in the eight years he has lived in his home. Mr. Sandberg said that Halifax was a cut - through street and he suggested that the 52nd Street entrance be moved to France Avenue. Steve Dobbs, 5320 Halifax Avenue, said he had two children under five with a third child on the way and traffic was a great concern. Mr. Dobbs said that traffic studies should address more than just trips in and out of the driveways. He said the project will be beautiful, but that the City must do something to solve the traffic issue. Mr. Dobbs suggested sidewalks as a stopgap, but emphasized that traffic must be dealt with soon. Page 12 Minutes/Edina City Council/March 21, 2006 Rick Leibold, 5105 Gorgas agreed the proposed development was great. He said he was not worried about traffic on Gorgas, but he was concerned about 52nd Street. He suggested a relocation of the garage entrance be considered. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Housh to close the public hearing. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Masica said she said she had originally thought to ask for a sidewalk on 52nd Street, but there have been many diverse opinions on whether or not that would be appropriate. She asked if it would be possible to maintain a good portion of the existing berm and landscaping and still install a sidewalk. Mr. Houle said that staff has not yet seen civil drawings on the project so he could not speak specifically, but noted there were ways to deal with berms by possibly using retaining walls. Member Masica asked if the developer felt it was possible to use a retaining wall and install a sidewalk. Mr. Noonan said he would work with City staff to see if it were possible and asked that the possibility of placing sidewalk on the other side of 52nd. Member Masica said she like the proposed project, felt that it related well to the neighborhood, and noted that the church had. the right to sell their property, and that the development will be an asset to the community. Member Housh said. while everyone complimented Mr. Noonan on the quality of the proposed development, all the residents expressed concern about traffic and whether the curb cut on 52nd was appropriate. He asked if using the France Avenue curb cut had been considered and not using 52nd Street. _Member.-Housh said he liked the proposal, that it felt like a_natural progression toward more density in the area, and that he would support the project. Mayor Hovland asked staff to review the needed actions: Mr. Larsen said the action before the Council would be three things on a preliminary basis: Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Rezoning. These approvals would not be final until conditions were met which would include: Final Rezoning, Final Plat, Developers Agreement and the Watershed District Permits. He said if the project did not happen, then the amendment to the comprehensive plan would not be finalized. Member Hulbert said she liked the project, but was troubled that a variance was being given because she did not believe there was a hardship. She said the zoning code needed to be amended and added it would be caught up with the next Comprehensive Plan. Member Housh said that he also supported the project, but the one thing he was bothered by was the curb cut on 52nd Street. He said he was concerned about the added traffic onto Halifax and Arden. Council briefly discussed the advisability of relocating the curb cut and potential location of the desired sidewalk. Consensus was to leave the curb cut alone, but add a condition of approval relative to the sidewalk. Mayor Hovland asked about traffic counts on Halifax. Mr. Houle pointed out that on the west side of 52nd Street there were two homes and on the east side there was four homes. Mr. Lillehaug said that going from memory; the counts on Halifax were approaching the 1000 ADT. He said he was not sure of 52nd Street. Mr. Lillehaug said that closing the access on 52nd Street and out to 54th Street was Page 13 Minutes/Edina City Council/March 21, 2006 redirecting a large portion of the traffic to a signalized intersection which would be safer than 52nd Street. Member Housh said that even though traffic was no longer traveling on 52nd Street, they would still be using Halifax to go to and from the church. Mayor Hovland agreed. with Member Housh, suggesting the traffic might just be moved south. Member Masica suggested that while traffic in the area was a problem, it was not necessarily a problem of the proposed development. Member Hulbert suggested asking the Transportation Commission to analyze the proposed development. Mayor Hovland reviewed the Transportation Commissions recommendation stating they have already done this analysis and that perhaps the entrance should be left alone. Member Swenson suggested that the largest setback was on 52nd Street where visitor parking would be located and the site should be left alone because reorienting the site makes everything more complicated. Member Swenson gave her support of the proposal stating she appreciated, the design quality and anticipated a well done project. Mayor Hovland said he liked the proposed project adding it would be a great addition to France Avenue. He said he believed it will raise neighborhood property levels. He complimented the developer on the quality'of its previous projects and stated his belief the proposed project would meet or exceed those levels. Member Housh gave the project his support, but again expressed concern about the curb cut on West 52nd Street. Mayor Hovland ' made a motion to grant preliminary plat for Brownstones Estates conditioned upon, 1) Amending the Comprehensive Plan from Quasi Public to Lot Density Attached Residential -2)- Final "Rezoning for above parcel, 3) Final Plat Approval, 4) Watershed District Permits, 5) Landscaping Plan, 6) Engineering Review, and 7) Options to be presented for West 52nd Street Side Sidewalk Plan. RESOLUTION NO. 2006-37 PRELIMINARY PLAT AND AMENDMENT TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BROWNSTONE ESTATES 52ND STREET AND FRANCE AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled, BROWNSTONES ON FRANCE, platted by Noonan, Properties, LLC ", and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council on March 21, 2006, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval with seven conditions: 1) Amending the Comprehensive Plan from Quasi Public to Lot Density Attached Residential, 2) Final Rezoning for above parcel, 3) Final Plat Approval, 4) Watershed - District Permits, 5) Landscaping Plan, 6) Engineering Review, and 7) Options to be presented for West 52nd Street Side Sidewalk PI an Passed and adopted this 21St day of March 2006. Member Masica seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Mayor Hovland made a motion to grant First Reading to Ordinance No. 850 -A -28 conditioned upon, 1) Amending the Comprehensive Plan from Quasi Public to Lot Density Attached Residential; 2) Final Rezoning for above parcel,, 3) Final Plat Approval, 4) Watershed District Page 14 Minutes/Edina City Council/March 21, 2006 Permits, 5) Landscaping Plan, 6) Engineering Review, and 7) Options to be presented for West 52nd Street Side Sidewalk Plan. Member Masica seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. HON C WILRY CARDARELLE AND APPROVING A CONDITIOANAL USE PERMIT FUR NURMANLIALE LUTHERAN CHURCH Affidavits oiVotice were pre nted, approved and ordered placed on file. Mr. Larsen explained the proposal was or a lot Wilryan to Normandale Lutheran Churc and tI land to expand the Church's existing par g lc CUP to expand their building resulting in a and to 205 spaces. Mr. Larsen said the m regulations to support that size sanctuary s support concurrent events which causes over approval of the lot division and subsequent c parking spaces to their existing lot. He report to screen the parking from nearby homes, tI plantings. _Mr.._.Larsen._reported _the..Planning Comr requested lot division and conditional use vision that would sell a portion of the lot at 6125 conditional use permit allowing the transferred e explained that in 1999 the Church received a ry seating 609 people with a parking lot expansion ember of parking spaces required under Edina's 3 so consequently no parking currently exists to parking onto neighborhood streets. He said that tional use permit would allow the addition of 48 it both the seller and church have agreed on a plan ,elan that includes a fence, berm and coniferous y recommended_._ the Council grant the Proponent Presentation Donald Brauer, 6116 Parnell Avenue, exp ined the church intent to construct the additional parking and screen it from nearby neighbors. a said it was the hope that the new parking lot would eliminate the overflow parking from us' g the residenti al str is during busy times at the Church. Public Comment Greg Benson, 6121 Wilryan, expre the lot on the south end of the r construction vehicles in the area. adding hard surface parking. Mr through the residential neighbonc( existing drainage issue near the MnDOT regarding an existing dr said he will have a feasibility rep r ;e his concern about wate lot. He also indicated c i r. Benson said the church rauer replied that no constru id. Mayor Hovland suggested 1 ;it should be mitigated. Mr. Lage basin southwest of the site for the issue in the next few mo off especially at the entrance to m over the potential impact of Id be increasing the run off by on traffic will be allowed to go at as a condition of approval the ule said he would check with `V could perhaps be of help. He Phyllis Beadle, 5124 Valley V' w Road, said all the neighbors were Alighted to have additional parking for the church. Mike Koelbl, 6124 Wilryan A enue said the neighbors would welcome the additional parking if it was used. He expressed concerns regarding run off from snow falls and the ability of emergency vehicles to traverse the neighborhood with street parking from the church. Page 15 o e MEMORANDUM - Plan Review a' ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA DATE: April 21, 2006 TO: Planning Department u/16k_ FROM: Wayne Houle — City Engineer / DPW C: Steve Kirchman — Chief Building Department Official SUBJECT: The Brownstones on France 5200 France Avenue South Engineering has reviewed the final plan submittal and offer the following comments: Overall comments: • Will require Developer's Agreement for Storm Sewer and possibly watermain. ■ Fire Marshall and Building Department still need to review the plans. ■ Overall the plans contain what Engineering requires for a Planning Commission review. Other items listed below need to be corrected prior to Developer's Agreement and Building Permit. She • Realign storm sewer at West 52 "d Street. • Provide profile of all public utilities such as the storm sewer along west property line and also watermain if alignment changes. • Indicate-drainage away from garage door opening.. - -- • Indicate / note "Public Storm Sewer" on 27" pipe. • Note width of sidewalk west of driveway. Can be a four -foot walk. • Driveway entrance needs to be 30' max width, per City Code. Add "Storm Sewer Plan" to sheet title. Sheet 3/5: • Show realigned storm sewer at West 52nd Street. • Place note on drawing that states: "Any utility not noted as Public private ". • Verify watermain alignment. • A public hydrant cannot be supplied by a private system. • Remove old 27" storm sewer alignment. • Show utility easements, i.e. Storm sewer, and watermain (if realigned). GAEngineering\GeneraltF Streets15200 France Ave - Brownstone 20061042106 review of 5200 France Avenue.doc Page 1 of 1 are considered Rivers Park Trails and supporting their system in Edina. Other systems that the City has pursued are the CP ail Trail but did not receive fund! g and currently, the Interlachen/Blake Trail. *s*x5e motion was made b hits to defer to the next meeting with staff input. Seconded b Dovolis. Mo carried. Y It should be noted that the aboveltotion was TWTT representatives will show a 20 after a quorum was reached. clip on Munster, Germany, at the next meeting. I. Call to Order The meeting was officially called to o r by chair Bennett at 6:25 p.m. II. New Business a. Traffic Study for Proposed Development at 5200 France Avenue, Brownstone on France Traffic Study Findings of Fact: The Transportation Commission shall consider the following four effects in the evaluation of traffic studies that are warranted by certain zoning, land -use, conditional use permits and final development plan applications prior to the application being submitted to the Planning Commission and Council for consideration: I) Does the development significantly affect the operation and congestion of the adjacent roadways or intersections and /or result in a traffic hazard? Finding: It is not anticipated that the proposed development will negatively affect the adjacent roadways and intersections. Traffic is being redistributed due to internal site revisions; however, access points to City streets are not being modified. The Levels of Service for the adjacent intersections are anticipated to remain unchanged. ii) Does the development significantly affect pedestrian safety? Findin : The development improves pedestrian safety by replacing curb -style sidewalks with boulevard -style sidewalks along France Avenue and constructing a new segment of sidewalk along West 52nd Street. iii) Does the development provide opportunities for enhanced transit usage, van pooling or car pooling? Finding: The site will continue to have direct access to the transit system along France Avenue. iv) Does the development provide feasible opportunities to address an existing traffic issue or safety problem? Finding: Development of the site does not limit future planning and opportunities for roadway improvements. The developer is proposing to build a 20 -unit condominium on land that is currently a church parking lot. Lillehaug said staff is recommending approval of the traffic study with one condition attached. The condition being for the developer to build a boulevard -style sidewalk .along France Avenue and along 52nd Street. The developer stated that they were not planning to build the sidewalk because it was not in any of their design layout throughout their meetings with the City. They are also concerned about the impact on the mature trees along bot streets. Additionally, the. developer said as a past resident of Halifax, he recalls a petition being submitted to the City for sidewalk along Halifax and it was denied. Lillehaug said the sidewalk petition is still valid; it just hasn't been acted upon. Bennett said part of the ETC's charge is working on the interconnectedness of all'trails /sidewalks where they exist and adding new ones when possible to make it safer for pedestrians and cyclists. Lillehaug reiterated staff's position to have boulevard -style sidewalks and that it can be done without impacting the trees. The traffic study conducted by Alliant Engineering, Inc. indicates there would be a reduction in a.m. and p.m. peak traffic in and out of the area on 52nd Street, the proposed entrance /exit to the development. It is expected that school buses will continue to enter from 54d' Street and is recommended that they exit on 54d' Street also. The church and school representative was asked about adequate parking in the future. He said they are giving up 277 stalls which leaves them with 300+ stalls which, is more stalls than they need. They do not foresee any growth that would overwhelm the number of remaining stalls and if this should happen they would most likely open a new site. The school does not foresee an increase either because they are at or near capacity. Dovolis motioned for approval of the project, but with a recommendation to Council that criteria be established that limit the church so they never exceed the remaining parking capacity that they have. This motion was amended by Thorpe to include acceptance of the traffic study, including condition number 1. Dovolis motioned for acceptance of the traffic study subject to the following two conditions: 1. Complete site plan to be submitted Including existing topography, existing sidewalk layout and proposed sidewalk layout. A boulevard style sidewalk shall be constructed along the south side of West 52nd Street and the west side of France Avenue. A proposed sidewalk plan shall be submitted for review and shall be designed to coincide and complement the existing sidewalk adjacent to France Avenue. 2. Criterion shall be established to limit future growth of the church so they do not exceed the remaining parking capacity. Seconded by White. Ayes: 5 Nayes: 0 Motion carried. Resident Mark John, 5007 Arden Avenue, stated that he was disappointed that the Commission did not get into the details of the traffic study. He is concerned about increased traffic on the local streets as a result of the development because they're essentially going from a single residence to multi -use and the residents will be cutting through on the loc?-' streets unlike the way it is now with France being the primary route. Dovolis explained that, 3 motioned for approval because an original plan called for a denser development and the zoning rules would have allowed it so he felt this was a good compromise. III. Old siness a. WeV 70th Street Transportation and Land Use Study, CAsultant Discussion Lillehaug asked t ETC if they would prefer that staff go through a RFP process or select a consultant that the 've worked with to conduct the West 70tt' S eet Study. Lillehaug said a tremendous amoun of time was spent putting together the E Edina . RFP and only two proposals were recei d, one of the two being the conita that staff would have chosen. Dovolis said the RFP rocess is an arduous one an� recmmended that staff chose the consultant. Bennett sal the issues aren't similar to the E Study she would be, okay with staff choosing the consul t. Plante thought it would m ke sense to continue on with the consultant that is working the NE Study. When to egin the study might be an issue because they are tied up w the NE Study. Benn suggested they could identify the consultant and hold an open ho se to notify residents t t a study is planned and find out from them what they see as proble Resident Harold abb said they already know what the problem is and it is a bad grid so y should direct th consultant to create a solution. Lillehaug said he could put together t scope of th proposal and have the ETC evaluate it to make sure the scope is accurate. Ben tt asked if a could have it ready for the next meeting. Lillehaug said he will try his best but th depart nt is very busy with 2006 projects. He is also looking at creating the model for the out ale area and it could possibly be the same consultant for both projects.. Plante asked why West 70th couldn't be co 'red with the France to York Study which is scheduled to begin very soon. Lillehaug sap ' t 's study is for safety improvements and the timing- is-to- take - advantage- of-proposed -rede elop ents -in the area. IV. Handouts a. Notice of Public Meeting, Pro osed High y 100 Interim Improvements, City of St. Louis Park White said she missed the open hou meeting and she \nane ncerned with the width of the lanes and severity of accidents. Lille ug said the mainli widths will narrow a little as they go under the bridge, but under he bridge is currenfigured as three lanes. The standard lane width is 12 ft. and Mn/ OT is planning to naa lanes to 11 ft. V. Approval of Minutes a. February 16, 2006 The following change was made o page two, paragraph 4, "He state 30 mph might be too fast, ....." Motion made by Thorpe to ap ove the minutes with above changes. VI. Planning Commissio Update (Commissioner Workinger) No update. VII. Open 4 in certain situations ed by Plante. MAKING LIVES WORK -X Sis enny Rehabilitad es at sister t . stitute.co 612.863.4 P, s, o1Le REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor Hovland and Members of the City Council FROM: John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: May 16, 2005 AGENDA ITEM W.A. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Treatment of Lakes and Ponds. Compan y Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Lake Restoration, Inc. 1.$18,110.32 2. Lake Management, Inc. 2. $21,892.14 3. Midwest Aquacare, Inc. 3. $35,939.49 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Account #: 5933.6103 Lake Restoration, Inc. $18,110.32 (includes sales tax) GENERAL INFORMATION: This is for purchase of aquatic vegetation (weeds and/or algae) control services on 39 ponds, approximately 54 acres, within the city for the year 2006. Treatments will take place late spring, and early fall of 2006. In most cases, these are holding ponds for storm water run -off. The services include labor and materials. The administration of required Minnesota Department of Natural Resources permits, fees and, customer mailings will be billed separately. Edina Park and Recreation John os, Director Department This Recommended bid is within budget not within budget n Wa nV,, Fi a ce Director Gordon Hughes, CkjManager o e vi �y REQUEST FOR PURCHASE ieee TO: Mayor Hovland and Members of the City Council FROM: John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: May 16, 2006 AGENDA ITEM: IV. B. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Asphalt Pathway Repair — Bredesen Park. Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Bituminous Roadways, Inc. 1. $24,512.50 2. Frattalone Paving, Inc. 2. $27,842.50 3. Midwest Asphalt Corp. 3. $46,139.00 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Bituminous Roadways, Inc. $24,512.50 Account #: PK -05 -003 GENERAL INFORMATION: This purchase is for repair of 925 linear feet of the Bredesen Park walking path. Specifications call for cutting and removing specified worn areas of asphalt. pathway and installing three inches of type 41 B wear course mixture; plus, a class 5 sub -base material as needed in accordance with specifications. This project is being funded by the Capital Improvement Plan, which is budgeted for $25,000.00 for this 2006 project. If approved by Council, the repairs would begin within two weeks after the Council meeting. - (I Edina Park and Recreation John Ke ri d, Director Department This Recommended bid is within budget not within budget Hughes, Director Manager o e co Ham° �y REQUEST FOR PURCHASE �Ra�M TO: Mayor Hovland and Members of the City Council FROM: John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 -DATE: - May 16, 2006 AGENDA ITEM: IV. C. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Roof Replacement – Braemar Arena Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Brent Anderson Associates, Inc. 1. $32,153.00 2. Central Roofing, Inc. 2. $33,419.00 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Brent Anderson Associates, Inc. $32,153.00 Account #: 5500.1720 GENERAL INFORMATION: This is for replacement to the phenolic section of approximately 3,100 square feet of roof at Braemar Arena. The damaged area is directly over the administrative offices and skate sharpening areas that were part of the 1987 renovation project. Specifications call for removal and disposal of existing roof membrane, insulation and loose gravel down to the structural deck; repair of unsuitable deck, application of low odor paint to existing metal deck; installation of 1.5" ISO insulation to the deck base; installation of 1.8" ISO insulation over the base layer; installation of Genflex EPDM roofing system; install 1/4" to 1 %2" roofing gravel and needed sheet metal and flashing. The roof comes with a 10 year guarantee. The project is being funded by the Capital Improvement Plan which is budgeted at $25,000. The 1987 renovation of Braemar Arena became part of a class action lawsuit involving improper corrosive insulation materials used in the roof. Braemar Arena is expected to receive $3,000 as part of the class action lawsuit settlement. The remaining balance needed to pay for the roof replacement will come out of Braemar Arena's operating funds. �— Edina Park and Recreation Kepnos ector Department This Recommended bid is within budget not within budget � dal n, i ance Director Hughes, ( ty Manager TO: Mayor & City Council REQUEST FOR PURCHASE FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Public Works VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: May 16, 2006 AGENDA ITEM IV. D. ITEM DESCRIPTION: ABB Variable Frequency Drive — Well No. 2 Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Mulcahy Engineered Fluid Handling and HVAC Solutions 1. $16,876.00 Sole Source RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Mulcahy Engineered Fluid Handling and HVAC Solutions $16,876.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This purchase is for a variable frequency drive for Well No. .2 that is located in Utley Park. The proposed well pump and motor to be used in the repaired of Well #2, requires a different Variable Frequency Drive (VFD) to operate the well motor. The City has been using ABB drives as a standard in all well houses because of their reliability. The purchase is funded through the Water Utility Funds. The Recommended Bid is within budget not within Hughes, Public Works — Utilities Deuartment , Finance Director TO: FROM: VIA: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Mayor & City Council Wayne D. Houle, PE, City Engineer Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: May 16, 2006 AGENDA ITEM W.E. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Asphalt Street Repairs from Water Main Repair Damage Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Klein Underground, LLC 1. $33,694.76 2. Bituminous Roadways . 2. $43,895.99 3. DMJ Asphalt 3. $48,910.00 4. Midwest Asphalt 4..$66,442.41 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Klein Underground, LLC GENERAL _INFORMATION: . $33,694.76 This project is to repair the roadways due to water main breaks throughout the winter months. This project is funded through the Water Utility Fund. Staff recommends awarding this project to Klein Underground, LLC 1,14L (iaz/' Public Works — Utilities Si nature De art ent The Recommended Bid is within budget not within budget J n allin, r#anf irector Co ton Hugh i Manager 0 owe 0 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item V.A. From: GORDON L. HUGHES Consent CITY MANAGER Information Only ❑ Date: MAY l6, 2006 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To'Council Subject: AMENDED JOINT AND El Motion 'Resolution COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT ❑ REQUIRING ANNUAL El Ordinance AUDITS FOR THE SOUTH- 0 F-1 Discussion WEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approve Joint and Cooperative Agreement. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND : At their last meeting, the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission recommended that all member cities approve an amended Joint and Cooperative Agreement. The only amendment to this agreement deals with a requirement to conduct an annual audit. The proposed changes to the agreement are shown on pages 15 and 16 of the attached document. Due to the volume of financial activity, the Commission believes that an annual audit is no longer necessary. Therefore, the proposed amendment allows any member city to require an audit -of the commission's financial books as deemed necessary. 0 AMENDED JOINT AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSION ARTICLE I. PREAMBLE The parties to this Agreement are governmental units of the State of Minnesota. This Agreement supersedes any prior Agreement between the parties covering the establishment of a Cable Communications Commission and is made pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §238.08 and §471.59, as amended. ARTICLE II. GENERAL PURPOSE The general purpose of the Agreement is to establish an organization to analyze the operation and Systems of the Member Cities; to coordinate administration and enforcement of the respective Franchises of the Member Cities; to report and recommend to the Member Cities relative to the operation of their respective Systems and the activities of their respective Grantees; and to perform such other duties as are required of the organization hereby created pursuant to this Agreement. ARTICLE III. NAME The name of the organization hereby created is Southwest Suburban Cable Commission. ARTICLE IV. DEFINITION OF TERMS Section 1. Definitions. For the purpose of this Agreement, the terms defined in this Article shall have the meanings given them by this Article. Section 2. Commission. Section 3. Section 4. 800934v2 "Board" or "Board of Directors" means the governing body of the "Commission" means the organization created pursuant to this Agreement. "Council" means the governing body of a Member City. Section 5. "Directors" means the persons appointed pursuant to this Agreement to serve as Directors, and includes alternate Directors when serving as Directors. Section 6. "Franchise" means any Cable Television Franchise granted by a Member City to this Agreement. Section 7. "Grantee" means any person to whom a Member City has granted a Franchise. Section 8. "Manners' Committee" means the committee consisting of the Director of each Member City who is the city manager, or his or her alternate. Section 9. "Member City' means a municipality which has entered into this Agreement and is in good standing. Section 10. "System" means any cable communications system operated within each Member City pursuant to a Member City's Franchise. ARTICLE V. MEMBER CITIES The Member Cities to this Agreement are Eden Prairie, Edina, Hopkins, Minnetonka and Richfield. Any other municipality served by a System through the same Grantee as the Member Cities to this Agreement may become a Member City upon approval by all of the then Member Cities. Eligible municipalities may become a Member City effective January 1 of any year thereafter, upon approval by a two- thirds (2/3) vote of the total Directors and upon payment of the initial contribution set out in Article XI, Section 2 hereof, and contributions for the year it becomes a Member City. ARTICLE VI. EFFECTIVE DATE Section 1. Execution of Agreement. A municipality shall enter into this Agreement by duly executing a copy of this Agreement and by action of its Council authorizing execution of 800934v2 2 a copy of this Agreement by its authorized officers. Whereupon, the clerk or other appropriate officer of that municipality shall file a duly executed copy of this Agreement with the Commission. Section 2. Effective Date. This Agreement is effective on the date executed by all of the Member Cities. ARTICLE VII. POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE COMMISSION AND PARTIES Section 1. General Authority. The Commission is established for the purposes of coordinating administration and enforcement of the individual Franchises of the Member Cities and providing uniformity in that administration and enforcement to insure that the System of the Grantee is constructed, operated, maintained and upgraded in a manner that will, to the extent possible, be to the maximum benefit of each Member City. To accomplish this purpose, the following divisions are made of authority and responsibilities among the Member Cities and the Commission. Section 2. Member City Powers and Duties. The Commission shall have only such powers and duties as are specifically granted in this Agreement or necessarily implied from those specifically granted. All powers and duties not so granted or necessarily implied are reserved to the Member Cities. Specifically, the Commission shall have no powers and duties in the following areas and the Member Cities retain sole authority in the following areas: A. General Powers. Each Member City retains authority to amend and renew its Franchise, initiate and defend lawsuits, and prosecute violations of its Franchise. B. Permits and Licenses. Each Member City retains authority to issue all required permits and licenses for the construction and operation of the System. 800934v2 Section 3. Powers and Duties of the Commission. Subject to the provisions of Section 2, the following powers and duties are delegated by the Member Cities to the Commission. A. Policy Decisions and Recommendations. The Commission shall make policy decisions and recommendations to Member Cities on the following: 1) Enforcement of Laws. Enforcement of laws, regulations and ordinances, related to cable communications, against Grantee and others. 2) Insurance Policies and Letters of Credit. The content and adequacy of insurance policies and letters of credit. 3) Marketing Practices. Review and report to the Member Cities on any marketing practices or subscription contracts which may be contrary to any of the Franchises, or which are not uniform in each Member City. 4) Granting of Franchises. The grant of new franchises by Member Cities. B. Complaints Relating to Grantee Actions. Receive, collect, tabulate and attempt to resolve by negotiation with Grantee all customer complaints and report to the affected Member City all unresolved complaints. C. Institutional Network. Monitor development of the institutional networks in each Member City and work with Grantee to promote prompt completion of the institutional network in each Member City. D. Cable Programming, Content, Scope, Alterations in Proarammin� Services. Deal with all matters relating to programming on its own initiation or upon request of a Member City. 800934v2 4 E. Access and Local Origination. _ Encourage and promote the use and development of access channels and programming and local origination programming, work with Grantee to coordinate such development and programming in each Member City, including the development of rules, training of persons and the use and maintenance of equipment. F. Performance Evaluation. Cause technical evaluations of the System whenever the Commission, in its sole discretion, concludes that such evaluations are required or desirable, including the periodic review and evaluation specified in the Member Cities' Franchises. G. Grantee Rules. Help to develop Grantee's rules regarding development and supervision of the System including, but not limited to, public access, local origination and line extensions. H. Technology and State of Art Review. Review changes and developments in the cable communications industry and facilitate the upgrading of the System. I. Statutory and Regulatory Changes. Advise the Member Cities of any required or recommended Franchise amendments. Interconnection with Other Systems. tems. Monitor the planning and development of the regional interconnection of the System with other cable television systems and supervise the implementation of interconnection to the extent not requiring Franchise amendment. K. Lobbying of Commission Policy at Other Governmental Levels. Present its policies to other governmental bodies involved in the regulation or operation of cable communications. 800934v2 L. Mediation of Member Cities /Grantee Disputes. Mediate disputes arising between a Member City and the Grantee when and if submitted to the Commission for resolution upon the mutual agreement of that Member City, the Grantee and the Commission. M. Franchise Fees; Grantee Audits. Coordinate payment of franchise fees to the Member Cities; examine books and records of Grantee and conduct any audits or reviews it deems appropriate and as may be required by the Franchises. N. Gifts. In appropriate circumstances, accept gifts, apply for and use grants, enter into agreements required in connection therewith, and hold, use and dispose of money or property received as a gift or grant in accordance with the terms thereof. O. Annual Report. Prepare an annual report to the Member Cities describing and summarizing its functions and activities for the preceding year P. Coordination and Defense of Civil Lawsuits. Provide assistance and coordination regarding the defense of any lawsuit pertaining to cable communications, or the enforcement of Franchises., Any such requested assistance or coordination shall be paid for by Member City or Member Cities requesting its defense of lawsuits in which the Commission is named as a defendant and shall be handled in a manner decided by the Commission. Q. Rates and Charges. To the extent permitted under the law, maintain records of rates and charges and evaluate changes requested by Grantee; advise and recommend to the Member Cities as to all requested rate or charge changes; obtain from Grantee and from any other source, such information relating to rates, costs and service 800934v2 6 levels as any Member City is entitled to obtain from Grantee or others; and conduct hearings as the Commission deems appropriate. R. Contracts. Make such contracts and enter into such agreements as it deems necessary to make effective any power granted to it or perform any duties imposed upon it by this Agreement or delegated to it by a Member City. The Commission may contract with any of the Member Cities or others to provide to it space, services or materials. S. Consultants and Legal Counsel. Contract with such persons as it deems necessary to accomplish its powers and duties. T. Procedures Relating to the Governance of Commission Operations. Notwithstanding any provision contained in this Agreement, with respect to the operating procedures of the Commission, the Commission is hereby authorized to establish from time to time bylaws or other policies and procedures relating to its own governance and operations, including procedures relating to meetings, dates of meetings, agendas, information contained on agendas and the functions of the Managers' Committee and Commission. ARTICLE VIII. BOARD OF DIRECTORS Section 1. General Powers. The property, affairs and business of this Commission shall be managed by the Board of Directors. Section 2. Qualifications; Appointment; Notices. Each Member City shall be entitled to two (2) Directors and two (2) alternate Directors. Each alternate shall serve as a Director when the Director for which he /she is an alternate cannot serve or is absent. One (1) Director and his/her alternate shall be a member of that Member City's Council. The other Director and 800934v2 7 his/her alternate shall be an administrator or staff member having, or likely to have, administrative responsibility for that Member City's System. Directors and alternates shall be appointed by the Council of each Member City at the time it becomes a Member City. When a Council appoints a Director, it shall give written notice initially of such appointment to the Chair. Such notice shall include the mailing address of the person so appointed. The names and addresses shown on such notices as the same may be challenged by subsequent notices given in writing, may be used as the official names and addresses for the purpose of giving notices to such persons for all purposes under this Agreement, including meetings of the Commission. Section 3. Officers Selection. At each annual meeting thereafter while the Commission is in existence, the Commission shall elect the Commission officers from its Directors. Section 4. By -Laws. The Commission shall adopt By -Laws governing its procedures including the time, place and frequency of its regular meetings, and the time and place of its annual meeting. The Commission may amend the By -Laws from time to time by either of the following methods: A. A proposed By -Law amendment may be submitted by a Director at any regular meeting. It shall then be referred to the Managers' Committee for its recommendation., The recommendation shall be presented to the Board at a regular meeting and voted upon at that or a subsequent meeting of the Commission; or B. A proposed By -Law amendment may be submitted by a Director by giving written notice thereof to all other Directors at least fourteen (14) days prior to a regular meeting at which it is to be acted on. The proposed amendment shall then be referred to the Managers' Committee for its recommendation. The recommendation shall 800934v2 be presented to the Board at the meeting stated in said notice and voted upon at that or a subsequent meeting of the Commission. In no event shall a proposed By -Law amendment be acted upon without a review by the Managers' Committee of not more than sixty (60) days. Section 5. Compensation. Directors shall serve without compensation from the Commission no matter in what capacity they serve, but this shall not prevent a Member City from providing compensation for its Directors if such compensation is authorized by the Member City and by law. Section 6. Voting. There shall be no voting by proxy. Each Director shall have one (1) vote. Votes must be cast at a Commission meeting. Directors shall not be eligible to vote during the time the Member City that appointed such Directors is in default on any contribution or payment to the Commission. During the existence of such default, the votes allotted to such Member City shall not be counted for any purposes under this Agreement. Section 7. Term; Resignation. Directors shall serve, at the pleasure of the Council appointing them, a term of two (2) years. In the case of Council member Directors, his/her term shall automatically cease when his/her term as a Council member is ended. Likewise, the term of a Director that is an administrator or staff member of a Member City shall cease upon termination of that person's employment with the appointing Member City. Directors may be reappointed at the pleasure of the Council appointing them. A Director may resign at any time by giving written notice to the Chair, effective upon the date stated in said notice, or if no date is stated, effective upon receipt by Chair. Acceptance of a resignation is not necessary to make it effective. 8009342 Section 8. Vacancies. A vacancy on the Commission, created by any cause, shall be filled, for the remaining term of the prior Director, by the Council of the Member City whose Director position on the Commission is vacant. Section 9. Quorum and Manner of Action. Except as provided in Article VII, Section 3, Paragraph K, a majority of the Directors shall constitute a quorum of the Commission, and the act of a majority of the Directors present at any meeting at which a quorum is present shall be the act of the Board. In the absence of a quorum, a majority of the Directors present may adjourn any meeting from time to time until a quorum is present. Notice of any adjourned' meeting need not be given other than by announcement at the meeting at which adjournment is taken. If a quorum is present when a duly called meeting is convened, the Directors present may adjourn the meeting, notwithstanding that the withdrawal of a number of Directors originally present leaves less than a quorum. No other business shall be transacted. Section 10. Annual and Regular Meetings. An annual meeting of the Commission shall be held in April of each year to elect officers of the Commission and for transaction of any other business to come before the meeting. Regular meetings shall be held at such times and places as shall be established in the By -Laws of the Commission. Section 11. Special Meetings. Special meetings of the Commission may be called (i) by the Chair, (ii) by the Managers' Committee, or (iii) by the Chair or Managers' Committee upon the written request of a majority of the Directors. Five (5) days written notice of special meetings shall be given to the Directors. Such notice shall include the agenda for the special meeting. Only matters set forth in the agenda shall be considered at the special meeting. Section 12. Notice. Notice of regular and annual meetings of the Commission shall be given to the Directors at least seven (7) days in advance and the agenda for such meetings shall 800934v2 10 accompany the notice. Business at regular meetings of the Commission is not limited to matters set forth in the agenda. Section 13. Notices Excused. Any meeting of the Board shall be a legal meeting without any notice thereof having been given if all of the Directors then in office are present at the meeting or waive notice in writing before, at or after the meeting. ARTICLE IX. OFFICERS Section 1. Number; Election; Oualifications. The officers of the Commission shall consist of a Chair, a Vice Chair and a Secretary/Treasurer. Each officer shall be elected at an annual meeting by the Board and shall hold office for a term of two (2) years and until his/her successor shall have been elected and have qualified or until his/her earlier disqualification, death, resignation or removal. All officers shall be Directors. New officers shall take office at the adjournment of the annual meeting of the Commission at which they were elected. Not more than one (1) Director of a Member City shall be elected an officer during the same term. Directors of a Member City that have given notice of withdrawal shall not be eligible to become officers or to vote on the selection of officers. Any officer who ceases to be a Director shall at the same time cease to be an officer. Section 2. Resignation. Any officer of the Commission may resign at any time by giving written notice of his/her resignation to the Board, to the Chair or to the Secretary/Treasurer of this Commission. The resignation shall take effect at the time, if any, specified therein or, if no time is specified therein, upon receipt thereof by said Board, Chair or Secretary/Treasurer. The acceptance of a resignation shall not be necessary to make it effective. Section 3. Removal. Any officer may be removed, with or without cause, by a vote of four -fifths (4/5) of the total number of Directors, at any meeting of the Board, provided that 800934v2 11 such purpose is stated in the notice or waiver of notice of the meeting unless all of the Directors of this Commission are present at the meeting. Section 4.' Vacancies. A vacancy in any office because of disqualification, death, resignation or removal shall be'filled for the unexpired portion of the term in the manner prescribed herein for election to that office. Section 5. Chair, Vice Chair. The Chair shall preside at all meetings of the Commission and shall perform all duties incident to the office of Chair and such other duties as may be delegated by the Commission. The Vice Chair shall act as Chair in the absence of the Chair. Section 6. Secretary /Treasurer. The Secretary/Treasurer shall be a Director who is an administrator or staff member of a Member City. He /she shall be responsible for keeping a record of all of the proceedings of the Commission and Managers' Committee and "shall serve as. the Chair of the Managers' Committee. The Secretary/Treasurer shall have custody of the Commission's funds, shall pay its bills, shall keep its financial records and generally conduct the financial affairs of the Commission. He /she shall be responsible for such other matters as shall be delegated to him/her by the Commission. Orders, checks and drafts of the Commission shall . require the signature of the Secretary/ Treasurer. In conducting the Commission's financial affairs, the Secretary/Treasurer shall, at all times, act in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Secretary/Treasurer's report, including any bills or claims to be acted upon by the Commission, shall be distributed to all Directors at each Commission meeting. The Commission shall have the option to mandate that the Commission bear the cost of any bond or insurance so required. Any fidelity bond or other insuran ce shall cover all persons authorized to 800934v2 12 handle funds of the Commission. Any persons may be engaged to perform such services under the Secretary/Treasurer's supervision and direction, when authorized by the Commission. Section 7. Other Officers. The Commission may appoint such other officers as it deems necessary. All such officers shall be Directors. Section 8. Committees. The Commission may appoint such committees as it deems necessary or desirable to accomplish its purposes. ARTICLE X. MANAGERS' COMMITTEE Section 1. Qualifications. The Managers' Committee shall consist of the administrator or staff member Director appointed by each Member City. Section 2. Authori . The Managers' Committee shall have the authority to manage the property, affairs and business of the Commission between Commission meetings, to the extent specifically delegated by the By -Laws or resolution of the Board, but at all times, shall be subject to the control and direction of the Board. Section 3. Meetings. The Managers' Committee shall meet as necessary at a time and place to be determined by the Managers' Committee. Special meetings may be called by any other two (2) members of the Managers' Committee or by the Commission. The date and place of the special meeting shall be fixed by the person or persons calling it. At least seventy - two (72) hours (from the time of mailing) advance written notice of a special meeting shall be given to all members of the Managers' Committee by the person or persons calling the meeting. The notice shall state the matters to be considered at the special meeting and only those matters shall be considered at that meeting. Section 4. Personnel. The Managers' Committee shall have authority to hire, supervise and discharge full or part time employees but their compensation shall be within 800934v2 13 budget limitations. The Managers' Committee may make any required employer contributions which local government units are authorized or required to make by law. Section 5. Notices Excused. The provisions of Article VIII, Section 13, shall apply to meetings of the Managers' Committee. Section 6. Quorum and Manner of Action. The provisions of Article VIII, Section 9, shall apply to meetings of the Managers' Committee. ARTICLE XI. FINANCIAL MATTERS Section 1. Fiscal Year. The fiscal year of the Commission shall be the calendar year. Section 2. Initial Contributions: An initial contribution of Two Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($2,500.00) shall be made to the Commission by each Member City at the time it becomes a Member City. Section 3. Contribution for Subsequent Years. Beginning in the calendar Year 2001 and for each year thereafter, each Member City shall contribute Two Thousand Five Hundred and No /100 Dollars ($2,500.00). Budget amounts recruited in excess of this minimum amount shall be paid by each Member City contributing. Each Member City shall contribute an amount which bears the same ratio to the total budget as that Member City's franchise fees received for the period ending August 31 of the year prior to the year for which such budget has.been prepared bears to the total franchise fees received for such prior period by all of the Member Cities combined, or such other amount or ratio as is agreed to by all of the Directors by August 1 of the year prior to the year for which such budget has been prepared and approved by the Council of each Member City. However, in any event, no Member City's contribution shall exceed the franchise fees received in such prior year by such Member City. 800934v2. 14 Section 4. Payment. Contributions, pursuant to Section 3, shall be due in full on each January 15, or by such installment method as the Commission shall determine. Section 5. Default. Contributions shall be due in full, or in accordance with an installment plan, within thirty (30) days after the date of the billing statement from the Commission. If payment has not been made within that time, a Member City will be in default. The Commission may recover any contribution in default by a civil suit, and the defaulting Member City, in such case, shall pay all costs of the suit, including reasonable attorneys' fees. Section 6. Budget Process. A proposed budget shall be formulated and approved by the Commission at the October Commission meeting each year. No budget shall become effective unless approved by a majority of the Member Cities. If any Council approves a proposed budget prior to notice having been received by its Directors of the withdrawal of any Member City (which may be done by notice given prior to October 1 of any year), that approval shall not be binding on that Member City, but that Council may reconsider such prior approval of the budget. All parties shall endeavor to approve the proposed budget on or before December of each year. If the budget is not approved, the Commission shall promptly formulate a revised budget and submit it to the Member Cities for their review and approval. This process shall be continued until a budget is approved. The Member Cities shall use their best efforts to approve a budget for the then succeeding year by December 31 of each year. Section 7. Expenditures. The Commission may expend its funds as it deems necessary and appropriate pursuant to this Agreement. Section 8. Audit. At any time, any Member City may require an audit, review or other verification of the Commission's financial books and records. The Commission shall determine the appropriate period of time for such audit, review or other verification. A copy of 800934v2 15 any audit, review or verification report shall be given to each Member City. The.Commission's books and records shall be available for and open to examination and copying by the Member Cities and their respective representatives at all reasonable times. ARTICLE XII. WITHDRAWAL Section 1. , Withdrawal. Any Member City may withdraw from this Agreement effective on January 1 of any year by giving notice pursuant to Section 2 of this Article prior to October 1 of the preceding year. Section 2. Notice. In order to effectuate a withdrawal, a Member City withdrawing from the Commission shall give written notice to the Chair of the Commission, served personally on the Chair or addressed to the Chair at the address shown on the records of the Commission, and by giving with such notice a certified copy of a resolution of its Council stating its decision to withdraw from the Commission. The withdrawal shall be effective upon actual receipt by the Chair of such notice and resolution: The withdrawing Member City shall have the responsibility for such actual receipt by the Chair. Upon receipt of such notice and resolution, the Chair of the Commission shall forward a copy of the notice and resolution to each Director. Section 3. Financial Effect of Withdrawal. No financial benefit shall inure to a Member City that withdraws from this Commission nor shall there be any reimbursement for any contribution made by the withdrawn Member City. ARTICLE XIII. AMENDMENTS Section 1. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended only by written amendment entered into by all the then Member Cities to this Agreement in the same manner as this Agreement is entered into pursuant to Article VI hereof. 800934v2 16 ARTICLE XIV. DISSOLUTION Section 1. Duration of Commission. The Commission may continue for a term up to and including the date the Franchises of the Member Cities expire. The Commission shall be dissolved if less than four (4) Member Cities remain, or by operation of state or federal law or regulation, now or hereafter enacted, or by mutual signed agreement of all of the Member Cities. Section 2. Distribution of Assets. Upon dissolution of the Commission, all remaining assets of the Commission, after payment of all obligations, shall be distributed among the Member Cities that are Member Cities to the Agreement at the time of dissolution, in proportion to their contributions and in accordance with procedures established by the Commission. The Commission shall continue to exist after dissolution for such period, no longer than six (6) months, as is necessary to wind up its affairs, but for no other purposes. ARTICLE XV. PRIOR AGREEMENTS SUPERSEDED This Agreement, when effective, supersedes all previous agreements between the Member Cities hereto establishing a joint cable communications commission. 800934v2 17 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned municipalities have caused this Agreement to be signed on their behalf. DATED: CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA Bv: Its: Manager /Clerk DATED: By: Its: Manager /Clerk DATED: By: Its: Manager /Clerk DATED: Bv: Its: Manager /Clerk DATED: Bv: Its: Manager /Clerk 800934v2 18 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 -4485 By: Its: Mayor CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 By: Its: Mayor CITY OF HOPKINS,. MINNESOTA 1010 1st Street South Hopkins, MN 55343 -7573 By: Its: Mayor CITY OF MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA 14600 Minnetonka Boulevard Minnetonka, MN 55345 By: Its: Mayor CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA 6700 Portland Avenue Richfield, MN 55423 -2599 By: Its: Mayor REPORPRECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Wayne D. Houle, PE w City Engineer Date: May 16, 2006 Subject: Change Order No. 2 for Well No. 2: Casing Pipe Renovation, City Contract No. PW 05 -3. Recommendation: Agenda Item # V.B. Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution Ordinance Discussion Authorize Change Order for alternate plan of rehabilitating Well No. 2 that is located in Utley Park. Info /Background: This change order, Change Order No. 2, is for the alternate plan to rehabilitate the well casing for this well. The initial project included removing the existing well casing and reinserting a new well casing. After many attempts the contractor could not remove the existing well casing. The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) then approved a plan to use a smaller well casing. The smaller casing has been installed and approved by the MDH. MDH approval included a method of grouting that had previously been in question with them. The proposed change order does not increase the approved contract amount by more than ten percent. However, staff felt that the change was drastic enough to inform the Council of the changed bid item schedule. The new bid item schedule was originally part of the bid documents but was not part of the original contract. The current Contractor, Keys Well Drilling Company, remains the low bid for the project. The alternate schedule will increase the contract from $98,850.00 to $107,450. This project is funded using Water Utility funds. Staff recommends approving this change order. GAEngineering \Contract Numbers\2005 \PW 05-3 Well #2 Casing Pipe Renovation\ADMIN\MISC\rr 051606 PW 05 -03 CO.doc Recommendation: Adopt Resolution. Info/Background: In order to comply with State Statutes all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have, prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the recipient departments for your consideration. ° . o ��a a REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # V. C. From: Debra Mangen Consent ❑ City Clerk Information Only F_1. Date: May 16, 2006 Mgr.Recommends To HRA To Council Subject: Resolution Receiving Action ® Motion Donation a _ Resolution ° Ordinance Discussion Recommendation: Adopt Resolution. Info/Background: In order to comply with State Statutes all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have, prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the recipient departments for your consideration. ° . o J ' RESOLUTION NO. 2006-57 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA C?) Of Edifla WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its'citizens. Donation to the Braemar Memorial Fund for future Golf Course equipment purchases as follows: Wesley and Marilyn Smith $50.00 Donation to the Edina Police Department for the second K -9 and its ongoing costs as follows: Edina Federated Women's Club $22,000.00 ` Dated: May 16, 2006 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor li STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 16, 2006 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_. City Clerk City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, .55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 To: Mayor & City Council From: Boyd Tate Traffic Safety Coordinator REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Date: May 16, 2006 Subject: Traffic Safety Staff Review for May 2, 2006 Recommendation: Agenda Item # V.D. Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Review and approve Traffic Safety Staff Review of Tuesday, May 2, 2006. Info /Background: It is not anticipated that residents will be in attendance at the Council meeting regarding any of the attached issues. G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Advisory Committee \Staff Review Summaries \06 TS AG & Min \05- 02- 06.doc TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW Tuesday May 2, 2006 The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on May 2, 2006. Staff present included the City Engineer, Traffic Engineer, Traffic Safety Coordinator, Sign Coordinator, and Chief of Police. From that review, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They have also been informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the May 16, 2006 Council Agenda. SECTION A: Requests on which staff recommends approval: 1. Request from a resident on Edina Court for a "No Parking Here to Corner" sign to be located 30' north of the Stop Sign located on Edina Court at its western entrance /exit onto 50th Street. Requestor states that cars, usually parked for Church events, are parked illegally at this Stop sign. Edina Court is a 32 -foot wide City street with curb and gutter. Current parking restrictions prohibit parking anytime on the south side of the street. Parking is allowed on the north side. There are no sidewalks and there have been no reported traffic or pedestrian accidents within the past 5 years. There have been long- standing parking issues along Edina Court. As is well known, much of the available parking along Edina Court is consumed by participants attending the many events held at St. Stephen's Church. Earlier this year the same requestor asked that the City sign and enforce a "No Parking" regulation for vehicles only related to the Church. However, this would be a form of selected enforcement. In the past, the City's legal counsel has indicated that the City cannot selectively enforce traffic laws and regulations and must remain equal and unambiguous to all public road users. A parking restriction survey was sent out in January 2006 to all residents of Edina Court. The survey results indicated that the majority of the residents felt that more stringent parking restrictions would ultimately be more harmful to the residents of Edina Court than to St. Stephen's Church. The Traffic Safety Advisory Committee recommended that no changes in parking restrictions be made and was approved as recommended at the February 21, 2006 Council meeting. Minnesota State Statue 169,34s7 states that "No vehicle shall park within 30 -feet of a Stop sign. This statute applies to all intersections where Stop signs are placed. Staff feels that placing an additional warning sign, (No Parking Here to Corner) would further alert motorists and help prevent violations. Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 1 of 3 May 2, 2006 Street. 2. Request for an advanced warning sign for the pedestrian crosswalk located on Hazelton Road mid -block between York and France Avenues at the promenade trail crossing. Requestor is a resident of York Avenue and is concerned for pedestrian safety while crossing Hazelton Road at this crosswalk. Hazelton Road is a four -lane Collector Street with two lanes in each direction with sidewalks on both sides of the street. Hazelton Road has a Mon. -Fri. average daily traffic count of 8,485 vehicles with an 85th percentile speed of 38.6 m.p.h.. There have been 11 vehicle accidents and 1 pedestrian accident reported within the past 5 years. However, none of the reported accidents were associated with the crosswalk. The crosswalk is delineated with crosswalk markings, signs, and a flashing yellow light. Eastbound vehicles have adequate sightlines to the crosswalk. However, there are sightline issues for westbound vehicles due to a horizontal curve in the road prior to the crosswalk. Staff recommends the installation of an advanced pedestrian warning sign on Hazelton Road for westbound traffic. 3. Request by several residents for "Curve Ahead" warning signs and a "no parking" zone along Park Terrace /Interlachen Boulevard at certain locations between Malibu Drive and Kelsey Terrace. Residents are concerned with the speed of vehicles negotiating the sharp curves and inclines on Park Terrace. Residents were also concerned about vehicles parking at the top of the hill at Park Terrace and Interlachen Boulevard in the boulevard area overlooking Van Valkenburg Park and the litter left behind in this area. Park Terrace is a 30 -foot wide City street with curb and gutter and a small center island located just south of the Interlachen /Park Terrace 90 degree curve area. Staff conducted traffic volume and speed studies in April of this year. Park Terrace had a Mon. -Fri. average daily traffic count of 1,126 vehicles per day with an 85`x' percentile speed of 33.2 m.p.h. There have been no reported accidents on Park Terrace within the past five years; however, the residents have indicated that vehicles often end up driving off the roadway due to the horizontal and vertical curves in the road. Staff attended a meeting on April 21, 2006 with several residents and property owners along Park Terrace. Traffic calming measures and safety issues were discussed. Sidewalks were also discussed and a petition was given to the residents for submittal consideration. Staff feels placing advisory signs in both directions in advance of the curves is warranted based on typical signing recommended by engineering design guidelines for roadways. Staff also feels that implementing a "No Parking" zone at the northerly curve area, on both sides of the street from the Center Island to the north and east of the curve will increase safety as well as deter people from parking in this area. Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 2 of 3 May 2, 2006 Staff recommends installing horizontal alignment turn signs (W1 -1) in advance of the two horizontal curves along Park Terrace /Interlachen Boulevard between Malibu Drive and Kelsey Terrace. Staff recommends installing No Parkins signs to implement a no parking zone on both sides of the street within the horizontal curve area where Park Terrace and interlachen Boulevard meet (west of Kelsey Terrace) within the median area and 125 ft. to the east. SECTION B: Requests on which staff recommends denial of request: None for May 2, 2006 meeting. SECTION C: Requests that are deferred to a later date or referred to others: None for May 2, 2006 meeting. Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 3 of 3 May 2, 2006 REPORURE C OMMENDATION To: Mayor Hovland and members of Agenda Item V. E. The Edina City Council. An From: John Keprios, Direct r Consent Park & Recreation De ment Information Only ❑ Date: May 16, 2006 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Change Order #1 Amt Construction ® Motion South View Middle School ❑ Resolution Gymnasium Construction ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion RECOMMENDATION: JPOC recommends approval of a $16,912.00 change order for Amt Construction to provide a drain tile system in the bottom of dry pond area of South View Middle School parking lot as part of the South View Middle School gym construction project. INFOBACKGROUND: On May 10, 2006, the Joint Powers Oversight Committee unanimously passed a motion to recommend approval of a change order needed to provide a drain tile system in the bottom of the dry pond area of South View Middle School parking lot. This new drain tile system is needed because of the addition of the new gymnasium. Without this correction, the additional rain -water run -off would continually damage the athletic field area between South View Middle School and Concord Elementary School. The Construction Manager, Kraus- Anderson, reviewed the pricing received from Arnt Construction; and Kraus- Anderson recommends issuance of the change order for this work. The City of Edina approved Amt Construction's original contract in the amount of $396,800.00. There have been seven previous change orders approved that total $36,409.48. This $16,912.00 change order'plus the previous seven change orders collectively exceed 10% of the original contract and therefore requires City Council approval. This change order will be covered within the $200,000 contingency budget. 5/t. 9:47:18 Page - 1 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING GENERAL (BILLING) POOL ADMINISTRATION POOL ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 957.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 134864 042806 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 957.00 283794 5/4/2006 100630 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC. 245.81 COPIER PAPER 134789 10053503-00 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 245.81 283795 5/4/2006 102109 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER 2,592.00 RADIO SERVICE 134751 67620 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,592.00 283796 5/4/2006 102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE 622.42 FOOD 00006333 134524 557848 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL i CRY C A R55CKREG x20000 Council Check Register 5/4/2006 -514/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 283787 5/4/2006 116536 A&B AUTO ELECTRIC INC. 319.50 ALTERNATOR 00001144 134560 47336 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 319.50 ALTERNATOR 00001153 134561 47344 15516530 REPAIR PARTS 639.00 283788 5/4/2006 100613 AAA 103.50 TABS FOR 26.119 134698 04 /25 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS 103.50 283789 5/4/2006 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 50.08 134628 600219 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 43.24 134629 600220 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 93.32 283790 51412006 100616 ACTION MAILING SERVICES INC. 480.34 MAIL PROCESSING 134788 200112 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 402.96 AQUATIC CENTER MAILER 134835 200150 5310.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 941.46 AQUATIC CENTER MAILER 134835 200150 5310.6235 POSTAGE 1,824.76 283791 5/4/2006 105162 ADT SECURITY SERVICES 26.39 ALARM SERVICE 134699 26417426 5111.6250 ALARM SERVICE 26.39 283792 5/4/2006 102191 ADVANCED GRAPHIC SYSTEMS INC. 188.35 TONER 134700 INV00068116 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 188.35 283793 5/4/2006 100867 ALSTAO, MARIAN 5/t. 9:47:18 Page - 1 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING GENERAL (BILLING) POOL ADMINISTRATION POOL ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 957.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 134864 042806 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 957.00 283794 5/4/2006 100630 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC. 245.81 COPIER PAPER 134789 10053503-00 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 245.81 283795 5/4/2006 102109 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER 2,592.00 RADIO SERVICE 134751 67620 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,592.00 283796 5/4/2006 102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE 622.42 FOOD 00006333 134524 557848 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL R55CKREG L6G20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/4/2006 -5/4/2006. Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 48.00 FOOD 00006333 134525 558217 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 670.42 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5430.5510 283797 5/412006 CITY COUNCIL 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING COMMUNICATIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 93.04 5616 KELLOGG PLACE 134701.. 11636 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 93.04 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 283798 514/2006 101954 AUGIE'S INC. 82.48 FOOD 00006324 134526 3219 65.28 FOOD 00006324 135004 3351 147.76 283799 514/2006 119736 BACKUP TRAINING CORP, THE 79.60 CERTIFICATES, 134790 042806 79.60 283800 5/4/2006 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO.' 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1400.6104 3,594.04 STORM SEWER ANALYSIS 134562 2327354- 138 04315.1705.20 12,554.39 SANITARY SEWER MODELING 134563 2327G13 -3 5923.6136 16,148.43 283801 5/4/2006 105838 BAUDVILLE 84.50 CERTIFICATE HOLDERS 00004099 134854 1454719 84.50 CERTIFICATE HOLDERS 00004099 134854 1454719 275.05 CERTIFICATE HOLDERS 00004099 134855 1453476 444.05 283802 5/4/2006 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION - 912.04 134630 36869000 4,282.80 134631- 36868900 121.65 134632 41405200 320.00 134633 36869100 493.90 134634 36868700 83.68 134635 41405100 173.22. 134889 41431600 984.80 134890 36937000 231.60 134891 36937100 231.20 134892 36904100 1513.6103 1100.6406 2210.6406 5842.5512 5842.5513 5842.5515 5842.5514 5822.5513 5822.5515 5842.5515 5842.5513 5842.5512 5862.5512 283803 5/4/2006 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 34.75 OFFICE SUPPLIES 134564 OE- 48436 -1 1260.6406 J 5/3/2006 9:47:18 Page - 2 Business Unit GRILL SNOW & ICE REMOVAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CONSULTING DESIGN STS -315 LAKE CORNIELA N'HOOD PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER COLLECTION SYSTEMS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY COUNCIL GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GF"-�AL 1 , R55CKREG __x20000 CITY O, A Council Check Register 514/2006 - 514!2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 34.75 283804 5/4/2006 100711 BLOOD, DAVID 10000 POLICE SERVICE 134744 050406 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRST AID SUPPLIES 5/3, 9:47:18 Page - 3 Business Unit RESERVE PROGRAM FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS PARKING RAMP GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKING RAMP PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER POTTERY 100.00 283805 5/412006 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 862.08 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003570 134752 50275761 1470.6510 639.63- CREDIT 134753 70020543 1470.6510 71.07- CREDIT 134754 70020544 1470.6510 177.80 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003554 134755 50268291 1470.6510 329.18 283806 514/2006 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 215.00 134636 66922 5842.5513 215.00 283807 5/4/2006 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 193.73 CLEANER ASSEMBLY 00005188 134565 861054 1553.6530 455.32 ENGINE REPAIRS 00005609 134566 142700 1553.6530 649.05 283808 5/4/2006 100667 BROCK WHITE COMPANY 730.32 MORTAR, EMACO 00001026 134567 11486524 -00 1375.6530 41.54 CONCRETE PATCH 00001026 134702 11486524 -01 1375.6406 771.86 283809 5/412006 103244 BURTIS, ROBERT 150.00 PERFORMANCE 5/11/06 134742 042506 5610.6136 150.00 283810 51412006 100776 BUTLER, GEORGE 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 134743 050406 1419.6102 100.00 283811 5/4/2006 102083 CALHOUN ISLES COMMUNITY BAND 100.00 PERFORMANCE 512/06 134738 042506 5610.6136 100.00 283812 5/4/2006 102046 CAMPE, HARRIET 77.35 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 134865 042806 5101.4413 436.00 POT MAINTENANCE 134865 042806 5112.6103 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRST AID SUPPLIES 5/3, 9:47:18 Page - 3 Business Unit RESERVE PROGRAM FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS PARKING RAMP GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKING RAMP PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER POTTERY CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 5/4/2006 -5/4/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 541.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 134865 042806 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5/3/2006 9:47:18 Page - 4 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 5842.5515 1,054.35 YORK SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 283813 51412006 5822.5515 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5514 42.15 50TH ST SELLING 134637 100687 5,266.60 134638 100686 14.05 134639 100679 618.25 134640 100678 5,941.05 283814 51412006 100456 CAPITOL RUBBER STAMP CO. 1,397.13 PLAN REVIEW STAMPS 134527 042006 1,397.13 283815 5/4/2006 117800 CARLSON, JOHN 150.00 PERFORMANCE 514/06 134739 042506 150.00 283816 5/4/2006 117061 CART -PARTS INC. 657.80 WINDSHIELDS, NETTING -19297 134756 384026 657.80 263817 5/4/2006 102064 CASH REGISTER SALES & SERVICE 16.41 INK RIBBONS 134791 041906 16.41 283818 5/4/2006 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 450.00 134641 44168 450.00 283819 514/2006 100681 CATCO 221.52 REPLACE ROD END 00001025 134568 1 -00322 147.08 FITTINGS, LIGHTS 00005801 134569 3 -00946 17.09 FITTINGS 00005182 134570 1 -03725 24.44 FITTINGS 00005182 134571 3 -01226, 31.03 SP5-S KIT 00005601 134572 3-00537 347.07 LED FLASH, PLUGS, CAPS 00005787 134792 3 -99081 788.23 283820 514/2006 118985 CAUFIELD, KEVIN 680.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 134866 042806 680.00 5/3/2006 9:47:18 Page - 4 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 5610.6136 5423.6406 1628.6513 5842.5513 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF CARS SENIOR CITIZENS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CITY O A Sia 9:47:18 R55CKREG j20000 Council Check Register Page - 5 5/4/2006 --5/4/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 283821 5/4/2006 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 350.36 TONER 00004094 134528 XS67701 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 927.58 TONER 00004097 134793 XW06202 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,277.94 283822 5/4/2006 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 116.76 134703 041906 5430.6186 HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 38.04 134757 04/19 7411.6186 HEAT PSTF OCCUPANCY 40.58 134758 APR19 7411.6186 HEAT PSTF OCCUPANCY 4,336.46 134836 AP24 1551.6186 HEAT CITY HALL GENERAL 4,531.84 283823 5/4/2006 117187 CHEM SYSTEMS LTD 24.39 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003568 134759 513349 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 24.39 283824 5/412006 102324 CHIEF 203.99 BID HAND CREAM 134794 436094 1400.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 203.99 283825 51412006 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 165.50 134893 309815 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 201.20 134894 310797 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 10.50 134895 311099 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 377.20 283826 5/4/2006 100256 CINGULAR WIRELESS 23.29 135005 041706 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 23.29 283627 5/4/2006 101345 COLOURS 1,857.00 TRASH CAN MAILER 134795 9506 -02 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 1,857.00 283828 5/4/2006 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 568.53 GLOVES, CPR MASKS 00005996 134573 02796763 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 43.16 GLOVES 00005972 134574 02798835 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 50.96 GLOVES 00001014 134575 02798880 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 220.08 1ST AID KITS, GLOVES 00001033 134704 02799907 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 202.12 SUNSCREEN, INSECT REPELLENT 00001038 134705 02800040 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,084.85 CITY OF EDINA 5/3/2006 9:47:18 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 6, 5/4/2006 - 5/4/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 263829 5/4/2006 119721 CROWN RENTAL 202.50 SCAFFOLDING RENTAL 00005958 134529 2918 05453.1705.31 MA TERIALS/SUPPLIES Chemical Rm. Expanslon -plant 4 202.50 283830 5/4/2006 103799 CURBSIDE LAWN CARE & IRRIGATIO 1,006.43 WEED SPRAYING, 00005410 134576 30194 1301.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,627.32 WEED SPRAYING 00005409 134577 30193 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW REVOLVING 2,633.75 283831 5/412006 102121 DATREK PROFESSIONAL BAGS INC 148.82 MERCHANDISE 00006150 135006 910792 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 148.82 283832 5/4/2006 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING 216.00 134642 358912 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 613.45 134643 359465 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 981.55 134644 359466 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 49.50 134645 358648 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,034.90 134896 359464 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,895.40 283833 5/4/2006 118490 DEEP ROCK WATER COMPANY 4.79 WATER 134837 042006 5311.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL OPERATION 4.79 283834 5/412006 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 390.88 WRENCH SET, PLIER SET 00001155 134796 883584 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 390.88 283835 5/412006 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 53.53 BAKERY 00006329 134530 213944 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 59.62 BAKERY 00006329 135007 214145 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 113.15 283836 514/2006 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST 128.45 135008 303864301 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 657.59 135008 303864301 5430.6188 TELEPHONE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 1,096.73 135008 303864301 5210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 2,872.85 135008 303864301 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 126.60 135009 300324133 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 126.60 135009 300324133 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPAW'v 1 RSSCKREG j20000 CITY O. A Council Check Register . 514/2006 -5/4/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1,074.60_ 135009 300324133 5621.6188 TELEPHONE 440.77 135010 303864329 5610.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 5/3, 9:47:18 Page - 7 Business Unit 50TH ST OCCUPANCY ED ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT SAND GRAVEL & ROCK STREET RENOVATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING GRILL 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 6,524.19 203837 51412006 100652 DIETRICHSON, BILL 336.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 134867 042806 5110.6103 336.00 283838 514/2008 101691 DON BETZEN GOLF SUPPLY CO. 303.53 PROXIMITY MARKERS 00006109 135011 20614 5422.6406 303.53 283839 5/4/2006 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES 20.00 FUEL SURCHARGE 134797 82700548 -06 5915.6586 20.00 283840 5/4/2006 101747 DRESSER TRAP ROCK INC. 804.52 FA -2 CHIPS 00005919 134706 58247 1314.6517 804.52 283841 5/4/2006 117435 DUNCAN, PATRICIA 84.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 134868 042806 5110.6103 84.00 283842 5/4/2006 100739 EAGLE WINE 6,100.72 134646 396462 5862.5513 152.99 134647 394500 5862.5513 1,818.43 134897 399927 5842.5513 707.56 134898 399922 5822.5513 1,066.50 134899 399918 5862.5513 9,846.20 283843 5/4/2006 100741 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 182.50 134531 218904 5421.5514 2,079.95 134648 329896 5822.5514 37.00 134649 329895 5822.5515 195.00 134650 659642 5842.5514 46.20 134900 329912 5842.5515 69.00 134901 329913 5842.5515 6,284.10 134902 329914 5842.5514 3,986.85 134903 329897 5862.5514 12,880.60 5/3, 9:47:18 Page - 7 Business Unit 50TH ST OCCUPANCY ED ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT SAND GRAVEL & ROCK STREET RENOVATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING GRILL 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING CITY OF EDINA 513/2006 9:47:18 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 8 5/4/2006 -5/4/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 283844 5/412006 119747 ECCO USA INC. 864.87 SHOES 00006108 135012 385033185 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 864.87 283845 51412006 118010 EGAN, BILL 159.75 BEAVER CONTROL 134760 040906 5422.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE S GROUNDS 426.00 MUSKRAT REMOVAL 134761 032706 5431.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 585.75 283846 51412006 101407 EGAN, MATT 254.38 2006 UNIFORM PURCHASE 134578 042406 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 254.38 283847 5/4/2006 104331 EILERS, JOYCE 92.95 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 134869 042806 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 92.95 283848 514/2006 116303 ETONIC WORLDWIDE LLC 444.69 MERCHANDISE 00006110 134532 45695 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 444.69 MERCHANDISE 00006110 134533 46566 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 889.38 283849 5/4/2006 100297 FAST FOTO & DIGITAL 10.66 PHOTO FINISHING 00003532 134762 3532 -T2- 223075 1470.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 10.66 283850 5/4/2006 100756 FEDERAL EXPRESS 54.05 SHIPPING CHARGES 134798 3-460 -59387 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 54.05 263851 51412006. 116492 FINANCE AND COMMERCE 80.00 REAL ESTATE THURSDAY 135013 369700012 -2006 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 80.00 283652 51412006 102727 FORCE AMERICA 12.46 O -RINGS 00001150 134707 01252207 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 12.46 283853 5/4/2006 100760 FOWLER ELECTRIC 72.74 CARBURETOR 00005183 134579 62638600 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 72.74 ' CITY O A 5/3. 8:47:18 R55CKREG X20000 Council Check Register Page - 9 5/4/2006 --5/4/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 283854 5/4/2006 102432 FREEWAY RADIATOR SERVICE 184.25 RADIATOR 00005187 134580 36666 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 184.25 283855 5/4/2006 104071 FREUND, JEFF 20.00 PETTY CASH 134838 042806 5610.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ED ADMINISTRATION 79.84 PETTY CASH 134838 042806 5610.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ED ADMINISTRATION 151.47 PETTY CASH 134838 042806 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 251.31 283856 5/4/2006 118896 FRYKMAN, LAURA 225.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 134870 042806 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 225.00 283857 5/412006 118456 FULTON, LAURA 525.70 ABOUT BUSINESS AD SALES 134799 101 2210.6123 MAGA71NEINEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 525.70 283858 5/4/2006 102456 GALLS INC. 314.91 POLO SHIRTS 134800 5826085500018 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 314.91 283859 51412006 102419 GARDEN & ASSOCIATES INC 110.00 INTERPRETER 134801 46274 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 110.00 283860 5/4/2006 101931 GEAR FOR SPORTS 164.73 MERCHANDISE 00006476 135014 11029853 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 164.73 283861 5/412006 105508 GEMPLER'S INC. 288.70 GARLIC OIL SPRAYER/ACCESSORIES002137 134839 1007799221 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 288.70 283862 514/2006 101867 GETSINGER, DONNA 249.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 134871 042806 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 249.00 283863 5/4/2006 104652 GILLIS, LOUISE 480.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 134872 042806 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 480.00 665.13 283871 514/2006 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 362.80 134653 397041 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING c � CITY OF EDINA 513/2006 9:47:18 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 10 5/4/2006 -5/4/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 283864 51412006 119737 GLOCK INC. 10.65 MAGAZINES 00003078 134802 289363 1400.6551 AMMUNITION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 10.65 283865 5/4/2006 100779 GOPHER CASH REGISTER 74.54 REGISTER TAPE 00006258 135015 24831 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 74.54 283866 5/4/2006 101103 GRAINGER 206.16 PAINT. BRUSHES 00001032 134581 9082226854 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 99.64 MEASURING WHEEL 00001142 134708 9084447789 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 383.72 CARPET DRYER 00002135 134840 9074863789 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 45.64 BULL POINT BITS 00001145 134856 9084972893 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 387.66 MARKING PAINT 00001151 134857 9084972885 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 64.78 LIGHTS 00006244 135016 9082665929 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 1,187.60 283867 5/412006 102670 GRAND PERE WINES INC 442.50 134651 00016360 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 442.50 283868 5/412006 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 236.50 134652 81121 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 331.50 134904 81313 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 431.00 134905 81312 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 183.00 134906 81293 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 519.50 134907 81294 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 503.00 134908 80995 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,204.50 283869 51412006 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 120.57 CIRCUIT BREAKER, LIGHTING 00005754 134582 916110498 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 120.57 283870 5/4/2008 102125 GREG LESSMAN SALES 508.33 MERCHANDISE 00006186 135017 32268 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 156.80 MERCHANDISE 00006186 135018 32275 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 665.13 283871 514/2006 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 362.80 134653 397041 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING c � I CITY G 4A 5Pc 9:47:18 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 11 5/4/2006 -5/4/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 5.10 134654 399860 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 111,54 134655 399929 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,007.52 134656 399930 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 34.35 134657 396463 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 643.53 134658 399925 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 32,22 134659 399926 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1.70 134909 399861 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,080.49 134910 399920 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 132.00- 134911 692154 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 165,54- 134912 691250 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 30.64- 134913 691251 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 40.00- 134914 692153 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 231.33- 134915 691898 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 7,679.74 283872 5/4/2006 100155 GRITTON, KAY 52.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 134873 042806 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 52.00 283873 5/412006 100327 GROW, LANA 78.50 CRAFT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 134874 042806 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 78.50 283874 514/2006 118734 HAGEN, DAVID MICHAEL 77.35 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 134875 042806 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 77.35 263875 5/4/2006 106029 HARRIS WAREHOUSE CANVAS & CAMP 279.97 TARPS 00001136 134709 6E065 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 128.72 TARP 00001133 134710 6F066 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 408.69 283876 5/4/2006 106062 HAYNES, STEPHEN 591.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 134876 042806 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 591.00 283877 5/4/2006 102209 HEALTH PARTNERS 465.60 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 134711 T. MONTPETIT 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 465.60 283878 5/4/2006 101576 HEGGIES PIZZA 303.00 PIZZA 00006334 135019 144497 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL CITY OF EDINA 5/312006 9:47:18 RSSCKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 12 5/4/2006 —5/4/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 303.00 283879 5/4/2006 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 205.44 MEAT PATTIES 00006335 134534 019105 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 205.44 283880 $14/2006 101503 HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS 48.00 FILING FEE 134803 ACCT503 2127.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMM DEV BLK GRANT 48.00 283881 5/412006 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 2,996.45 MARCH 2006 134804 001393 1195.6225 BOARD & ROOM PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES 2,996.45 283882 5/4/2006 102460 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 1,217.81 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 134763 2006 1000.1303 DUE FROM HRA GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 9,848.09 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 134763 2006 1503.6915 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 11,065.90 283883 5/412006 106371 HENNEPIN FACULTY ASSOCIATES 2,265.17 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES 134750 050406 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,265.17 - 283884 51412006 118765 HENRY SCHEIN INC. 157.51 VIONEX TOWELETTES 134805 7885103 -01 1400.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 157.51 283885 5/4/2006 103753 HILLYARD INC. - 289.51 FLOOR STRIPPER/SEALER 00002142 134841 1726740 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 290.41 FLOOR SUPPLIES 00002138 134842 1721504 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 579.92 283886 5/4/2006 119673 HOCKENBERGS 900.00 COUNTER TOP OVEN 00006257 135020 812511 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 900.00 283887 5/4/2006 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 358.50 134660 386689 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,110.90 134661 386688 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,069.50 134916 386691 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,538.90 CITY 01 A 5/3, 9:47:18 R55CKREG j20000 Council Check Register Page - 13 514/2006 —514/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 283886 _ 51412006. 101426 HUGHES, GORDON 301.71 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 135021 050106 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION 301.71 283889 5/412006 101714 IDENTISYS INC. 1,575.00 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 135022 18925 5310.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL ADMINISTRATION 1,575.00 283890 51412006 116191 INSTY- PRINTS . 170.88 RENTAL APPLICATIONS 00002369 134764 73149 5610.6575 PRINTING ED ADMINISTRATION 170.88 283891 5/412006 119735 IRLBECK, KEITH 716.85 KNEE/SHIN COMBO, BATS 134806 042705 1628.6406.03 SOFTBALL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 716.85 283892 5/412006 119723 IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT 150.00 SPRINKLER REPAIR 134583 17807 01326.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS SUNNYSLOPE ST RECLAIM 150.00 263893 5/4/2006 101403 J -CRAFT 2,117.22 REPAIRS 00001121 134584 39280 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,304.66 TRUCK REPAIRS 00001117 134858 39279 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 4,421.88 283894 5/4/2006 101861 J.H. LARSON COMPANY 37.40 SCREWDRIVER, CUTTER 00001158 134810 4036572 -01 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 200.22 WIRE 00001158 134810 4036572 -01 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 237.62 283895 5/4/2006 118275 J.P. COOKE CO., THE 63.25 N85 STAMP 134585 500523 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 63.25 263896 514/2006 101400 JAMES, WILLIAM F 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 134748 050406 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 283897 514/2006 102146 JESSEN PRESS - 726.86 ARBLE BROCHURE •134807 53014 1629.6575 PRINTING ADAPTIVE RECREATION 726.86 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 283898 51412006 283900 51412006 1 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/4/2006 --5/4/2006 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 103215 JOHN E. REID & ASSOCIATES INC. 550.00 TRAINING COURSE 134808 22765 1400.6104 714.77 1,998.71 1,239.45 30.00 30.00 5.04 - 18.62- 1,629.83 46.63 7,077.37 3.09 673.98 72.24 872.83 3,095.36 190.56 1,005.12 1,615.98 257.94 287.21 1,276.38 3,586.63 510.65 536.42 389.11 845.12 701.04 92.03 - 7.33- 76.00- 43.53 - 43,53- 29.30- 25.03- 19.30- 28,326.71 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 134662 1064033 134663 1064025 134664 1064036 134665 1063330 134666 1063331 134667 309360 134668 309361 134917 1067497 134918 1067494 134919 1067496 134920 1067493 134921 1067501 134922 1067500 134923 1067499 134924 1067498 134925 1067495 134926 1067490 134927 1067491 134928 1067492 134929 1068473 134930 1067503 134931 1067505 134932 1067488 134933 1067489 134934 1067502 134935 1067506 134936 1067504 134937 306075 134938 306795 134939 306796 134940 307024 134941 306672 134942 306674 134943 308272 134944 309362 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5822.5513 5842.5513 5822.5515 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5512 5822.5513 5822.5512 5822.5513 5842.5513 5862.5512 5862.5512 5822.5513 5822.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 Subledger Account Description CONFERENCES S SCHOOLS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5/3/2006 9:47:18 Page - 14 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 5/a 9:47:18 Page- 15 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION RICHARDS GOLF COURSE EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION ART CENTER REVENUES 907.58 MERCHANDISE 00006111 134536 2354729 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CITY O A 00006111 134537 R55CKREG 120000 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 937.42- Council Check Register 263906 5/4/2006 5/4/2006 --5/4/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 283901 5/412006 05435.1705.21 103654 JOHNSON, DENISE VANVALK WATER TOWER REHAB 1,255.00 342.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 134877 042806 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 283907 5/412006' 342.00 104979 KOCON, ED 283902 5/4/2006 103230 JOHNSTONS SALES & SERVICE 149.52 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 135023 042706 5410.6107 46.75 - VACUUM BAGS 00006248 134535 734205 5430.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 46.75 283908 283903 5/412006 - 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 106243 K9 STORM INCORPORATED 52.90 16' DOG LEAD 00003062 134809 US2991 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 52.90 26.24 DRILL BITS 283904 51412006 1553.6556 116887 KC FINE ART LLC EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 134.64 DRILL BITS 46.54 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 134878 042806 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 46.54 WASHERS, NUTS, TY -RAP 00001010 134588 4328746 1553.6585 283905 5/4/2006 116295 KING PAR CORPORATION 592.39 5/a 9:47:18 Page- 15 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION RICHARDS GOLF COURSE EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION ART CENTER REVENUES 907.58 MERCHANDISE 00006111 134536 2354729 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 29.84 MERCHANDISE 00006111 134537 2352934 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 937.42- 263906 5/4/2006 100002 KLM ENGINEERING INC. 1,255.00 PROJECT SUPERVISION 134586 2920 05435.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION VANVALK WATER TOWER REHAB 1,255.00 283907 5/412006' 104979 KOCON, ED 149.52 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 135023 042706 5410.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 149.52 283908 5/412006 - 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 16.39 . DRILL BITS 00001010 134587 4328747 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 26.24 DRILL BITS 00001010 134587 4328747 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 134.64 DRILL BITS 00001010 134567 4328747 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 415.12 WASHERS, NUTS, TY -RAP 00001010 134588 4328746 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 592.39 283909 5/4/2006 100853 LEEF SERVICES 34.83 SHOP TOWELS 134765 1117976 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 34.83 283910 5/4/2006 100857 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC. 218.54 TRUCK LIFT, CHAIN ASSEMBLY 00005600 134589 00035770 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5/3/2006 9:47:18 Page - 16 Business Unit CENT SVC PW BUILDING ASSESSING 404.70 CARPET CLEANING 135025 042606 CITY OF EDINA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES R55CKREG LOG20000 404.70 283914 5/4/2006 Council Check Register 5/4/2006 -5/4/2006 BAKERY Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description BAKERY 00006349 134540 218.54 - 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 283911 5/4/2006 106301 LOFFLER COMPANIES INC. 283915 51412008 63.03 COPIER USAGE 00001512 134538 149343 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 63.03 MAMA LUNCHEON 134766 1469 2839.12 5/4/2006 ADMINISTRATION 101165 MAA.O. 110.00 SUMMER SEMINARS 135024 050106 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 110.00 . 3,945.40 283913 5/4/2006 923739 112095 MAGIC CARPET SPECIALISTS INC. COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5/3/2006 9:47:18 Page - 16 Business Unit CENT SVC PW BUILDING ASSESSING 404.70 CARPET CLEANING 135025 042606 5861.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES VERNON OCCUPANCY 404.70 283914 5/4/2006 119674 MAIN STREET BAKERY 51.21 BAKERY 00006349 134539 54646 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 51.21 BAKERY 00006349 134540 54610 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 102.42 283915 51412008 100866 MAMA 18.00 MAMA LUNCHEON 134766 1469 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION 18.00 283916 5/4/2006 100868 MARK VII SALES 3,945.40 134669 923739 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 18.45 134670 923740 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,717.33 134945 925872 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 13.60 134946 923345 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 18.45 134947 925873 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 99.75 134948 925874 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 13.60 134949 926118 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,704.50 134950 926117 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,485.00 134951 923344 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,083.50 134952 924262 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 120.00- 134953 918037CR 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 283917 51412006 102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC 170.00 PHONE PROGRAMMING 135026 30762 1550.6188 TELEPHONE 170.00 283918 5/4/7'- 101146 MATRIX TELECOM INC. - CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1 R55CKREG j20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 259.14 259.14 CITY O A Council Check Register 5/4/2006 -5/4/2006 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 134712 005334004 1550.6188 283919 5/412008 103189 MEDICA 7,879.61 PREMIUM 135027 C0006377014 70,437.82 PREMIUM 135027 C0006377014 78,317.43 283920 51412006 100953 MEDTRONIC EMERGENCY RESPONSE S 1,543.19 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003571 134767 PC845365 1,543.19 283921 51412006 101292 MEDZIS, ANDREW 62.30 SEMINAR EXPENSE 134768 041906 152.22 SEMINAR EXPENSE 134768 041906 214.52 283922 51412006 101483 MENARDS 53.92 SPRINKLER, HOSE 00006462 134769 16442 178.81 LANDSCAPE TIMBERS 00006470 134770 17643 51 AS SHELVING 00006245 135028 17844 284.19 283923 51412006 101987 MENARDS 118.20 FERTILIZER, MULCH 00002144 134843 83595 25AS MULCH 00002144 134844 84100 143.65 283924 5/412006 118953 MERCURY OFFICE SUPPLY 185.14 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00009193 134713 185481-0 127.57 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00009193 134714 185260-0 312.71 283925 51412006 100882 MERIT SUPPLY 1,309.15 POLYLINERS 00005979 134590 69232 477.65 TAR CLEANER 00005953 134591 69248 627.29 VACUUM 00005966 134592 69247 928.79 WYPALLS, BOOT BRUSHES 00005965 134593 69249 197.20 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00005942 134715 69192 472.01 TISSUE, TOWELS, SOAP 00001125 134716 69296 252.09 CLEANERS 00008012 134771 69317 413.22 POLYLINERS, TISSUE 00008013 134772 69287 1550.6043 1550.6040 1470.6510 1470.6107 1470.6104 5422.6406 5422.6406 5423.6406 5620.6540 5620.6406 5110.6513 5110.6513 4090.6406 1314.6406 1552.6710 1552.6511 5861.6406 1552.6511 5511.6511 5511.6511 Subledger Account Description TELEPHONE COBRAINSURANCE HOSPITALIZATION FIRST AID SUPPLIES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES FERTILIZER GENERAL SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES 5/3, 9:47:18 Page- 17 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GOLF CARS EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION STREET REVOLVING STREET RENOVATION CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING VERNON OCCUPANCY CENT SVC PW BUILDING ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/4/2006 -5/4/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1400.6104 1190.6104 5410.6105 5/3/2006 9:47:18 Page - 18 Business Unit CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 5125.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 4,677.40 5125.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT MEDIA STUDIO 283926 5/4/2006 MEDIA STUDIO 100041 METRO CISM TEAM GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 5440.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 120.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 134811 042506 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 120.00 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 283927 5/4/2006 115212 METRO /MINNESOTA CHAPTER 125.00 REAL ESTATE TRENDS 2006 135029 050106 125.00 283928 5/4/2006 100889 MGA 360.00 MGA DUES 00006254 134541 1500 -2006 360.00 283929 5/4/2006 104650 MICRO CENTER 316.18 MEDIA LAB ITEMS 00009198 134717 1126974 74.54- RETURN 134718 1129221 247.05 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 00009191 134719 1119691 35.00 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 134845 1107099 69.22 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 134845 1107099 270AB COMPUTER SUPPLIES 134845 1107099 863.39 283930 5/4/2006 100692 MIDWEST COCA -COLA EAGAN 152.60 134954 81082053 228.60 134955 80344082 381.20 283931 5/4/2006 103186 MIDWEST FUELS 1,698.26 GAS 00006070 134773 35344 339.87 DIESEL FUEL 00006071 134774 35346 2,038.13 283932 5/4/2006 119738 MIDWEST MINIMELTS 1,125.00 ICE CREAM 134859 10164 1,125.00 283933 5/412006 101890 MIDWEST VENDING INC 186.54 CANDY 00006338 135030 4434 186.54 283934 514P^ "q 102873 MILLER, SUSAN 1400.6104 1190.6104 5410.6105 5/3/2006 9:47:18 Page - 18 Business Unit CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 5125.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT MEDIA STUDIO 5125.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT MEDIA STUDIO 5125.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MEDIA STUDIO 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 5440.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 5/3, 9:47:18 Page - 19 Business Unit PLAYGROUND & THEATER ADAPTIVE RECREATION COLLECTION SYSTEMS ASSESSING CENT SVC PW BUILDING ASSESSING PARK ADMIN. GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 144.00 GOLF SHOT COUNTERS 00006255 135033 10047 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 144.00 283943 5/412006 102358 NATIONAL PEN CORPORATION 54.47 PENS 00006253 134543 103481175 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 54.47 283944 5/4/2006 106334 NELSON, PEGGY 1,056.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 134879 042806 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO CITY O. A R55CKREG _ _ -j20000 Council Check Register 5/412006 -5/4/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 15.36 PARADE SUPPLIES 134812 042706 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 172.30 PROGRAM & BANQUET SUPPLIES 134812 042706 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 187.66 283935 5/412008 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 720.00 SEWER LINE REPAIR 00001047 134542 32818 5923.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 720.00 283936 5/4/2006 101320 MINNEAPOLIS AREA ASSOC OF REAL 150.00 MLS ACCESS FEES 135031 1344912,1344913 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 150.00 283937 5/412006 100522 MINNESOTA AIR INC. 184.05 ACTUATOR MOTOR 00005653 134813 3037732 -00 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS 184.05 283938 5/412006 101878 MINNESOTA REAL ESTATE JOURNAL 85.00 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 135032 020521 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 85.00 283939 51412006 101459 MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARKAS 75.00 SUMMIT WORKSHOP 00007058 134594 4347 1600.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 75.00 283940 51412006 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. 67.10 ASPHALT EMULSION 00005924 134720 49855 1301.6518 BLACKTOP 67.10 283941 5/4/2006 100906 MT1 DISTRIBUTING INC. 50.40 MOWER PARTS 00006464 134775 516607 -00 5431.6530 REPAIR PARTS 50.40 283942 5/4/2006 119746 NAGELL, NANCY 5/3, 9:47:18 Page - 19 Business Unit PLAYGROUND & THEATER ADAPTIVE RECREATION COLLECTION SYSTEMS ASSESSING CENT SVC PW BUILDING ASSESSING PARK ADMIN. GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 144.00 GOLF SHOT COUNTERS 00006255 135033 10047 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 144.00 283943 5/412006 102358 NATIONAL PEN CORPORATION 54.47 PENS 00006253 134543 103481175 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 54.47 283944 5/4/2006 106334 NELSON, PEGGY 1,056.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 134879 042806 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 514/2006 - --5/412006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1,056.00 283945 514/2006 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 283946 5/4/2006 114.48 104672 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 00009156 134721 32794300 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 442.89 134776 757391129 -041 1470.6151 442.89 263951 5/412006 283947 5/4/2006 101958 NICOL, JANET 492.50 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 134880 042806 5125.6103 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 492.50 150.15 283948 514/2006 100724 NISSEN, DICK 283952 51412006 100729 ODLAND, DOROTHY 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 134747 050406 1419.6102 100.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 134881 042806 283949 51412006 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY 504.00 1,078.50 STROBES 00005604 134595 9931 1553.6585 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 1,078.50 283950 5/412006 19.17 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY 00006216 134545 333685576 - 001 5/3/2006 9:47:18 Page - 20 Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES ACCESSORIES MEDIA STUDIO RESERVE PROGRAM EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP INSPECTIONS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 114.48 DRAWING PAD TAPE BDS 00009156 134721 32794300 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 114.48 - 263951 5/412006 116114 OCE 150.15 MARCH MAINTENANCE 134544 985363633 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 150.15 283952 51412006 100729 ODLAND, DOROTHY 504.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 134881 042806 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 504.00 283953 5/412006 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 19.17 PENCILS 00006216 134545 333685576 - 001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 19.17 283954 51412006 102712 OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOG 17.98 ARNESON 134737 W06030547 1646.6188 TELEPHONE 35.96 GREENHOUSE 134737 W06030547 1646.6188 TELEPHONE 71.92 134737 W06030547 5821.6188 TELEPHONE MEDIA STUDIO RESERVE PROGRAM EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP INSPECTIONS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 5110.6103 5112.6530 5101.4413 5112.6103 5110.6103 5/5 9:47:18 Page - 21 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE VERNON OCCUPANCY POOL OPERATION YORK FIRE STATION ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT GOLF DOME PROGRAM YORK OCCUPANCY SKATING 8 HOCKEY ED ADMINISTRATION CLUB HOUSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION REPAIR PARTS ART WORK SOLD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,791.73 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 283955 5/4/2006 5862.5513 CITY C J1 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE R55CKREG _ X20000 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 336.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 134882 042806 336.00 Council Check Register 283956 5/4/2006 5/4/2006 -5/4/2006 & LANDSCA Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 89.90 CARD ACCESS -PARKS 134737 W06030547 1646.6188 TELEPHONE 89.90 283957 134737 W06030547 1550.6188 TELEPHONE 90.43 HISTORICAL 134737 W06030547 1646.6188 TELEPHONE 91.41 134737 W06030547 5861.6188 TELEPHONE 98.94 134737 W06030547 5311.6188 TELEPHONE 108.01 134737 W06030547 1481.6188 TELEPHONE 119.62 283958 134737 W06030547 5111.6188 TELEPHONE 121.67 134737 W06030547 5210.6188 TELEPHONE 144.19 134737 W06030547 5841.6188 TELEPHONE 161.92 134737 W06030547 1622.6188 TELEPHONE 426.26 134737 W06030547 5610.6188 TELEPHONE 123.62 135034 W06030554 5420.6188 TELEPHONE 5110.6103 5112.6530 5101.4413 5112.6103 5110.6103 5/5 9:47:18 Page - 21 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE VERNON OCCUPANCY POOL OPERATION YORK FIRE STATION ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT GOLF DOME PROGRAM YORK OCCUPANCY SKATING 8 HOCKEY ED ADMINISTRATION CLUB HOUSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION REPAIR PARTS ART WORK SOLD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,791.73 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 283955 5/4/2006 5862.5513 119742 OTIS, JENNIFER 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 336.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 134882 042806 336.00 283956 5/4/2006 119741 OTTSTER CONSTRUCTION & LANDSCA 2,425.00 MOVE AND INSTALL KILN 134888 1865 2,425.00 283957 5/4/2006 102440 PASS, GRACE 73.13 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 134884 042906 450.00 POT MAINTENANCE 134884 042906 467.50 INSTRUCTOR AC 134884 042906 990.63 283958 5/4/2006 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 262.00 134672 8106362 -IN 3,297.00 134673 8105913 -IN 27.95 134956 8106761 -IN 2,958.20 134956 8106761 -IN 971.25 134957 8106759 -IN 943.92 134958 8106760 -IN 5.58- 134959 8103250 -CM 8,454.74 283959 5/4/2006 102963 PELUF, JIM 199.93 2006 UNIFORM PURCHASE 134596 042406 199.93 5110.6103 5112.6530 5101.4413 5112.6103 5110.6103 5/5 9:47:18 Page - 21 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE VERNON OCCUPANCY POOL OPERATION YORK FIRE STATION ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT GOLF DOME PROGRAM YORK OCCUPANCY SKATING 8 HOCKEY ED ADMINISTRATION CLUB HOUSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION REPAIR PARTS ART WORK SOLD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1301.6201 LAUNDRY ART CENTER POTTERY ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER POTTERY ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING BOTH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING GENERAL MAINTENANCE CITY OF EDINA 5/312006 9:47:18 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 22 5/4/2006 -514/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 283960 514/2006 101565 PENN CYCLE 86.24 BIKE HELMET 134814 02- 260622 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 86.24 283961 51412006 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 1,113.70 134546 27983003 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 47.40 134547 32914035 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 279.50 135035 27983129 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 1,440.60 283962 5/4/2006 103512 PETTY CASH 33.04- POLICE DEPT PETTY CASH 134722 042506 1400.8060 CASH OVER AND UNDER POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 10.41 POLICE DEPT PETTY CASH 134722 042506 1400.6551 AMMUNITION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 18.95 POLICE DEPT PETTY CASH 134722 042506 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 30.75 POLICE DEPT PETTY CASH 134722 042506 1400.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 131.57 POLICE DEPT PETTY CASH 134722 042506 1400.6106 MEETING EXPENSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 182.05 POLICE DEPT PETTY CASH 134722 042506 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 309.31 POLICE DEPT PETTY CASH 134722 042506 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 650.00 283964 5/4/2006 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 3,057.33 134674 2318917 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,021.42 134675 2318916 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,402.23 134676 2318910 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,150.92 134677 2311335 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 11.00- 134678 3337073 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 8.99- 134679 3337162 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6.67- 134680 3337163 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 7.59- 134681 3337164 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 27.60- 134682 3337165 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,799.95 134960 2321449 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 94.56 134961 2321450 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,225.11 134962 2321451 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 403.35 134963 2321452 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,721.14 134964 2321447 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,552.39 134965 2321448 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1.03 134966 2321446 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 828.75 134967 2321443 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 418.55 134968 2321444 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 648.55 134969 2321445 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4.83- 134970 3335663 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 9.50- 11349711 3335664 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING CITY O. A 5/3, 9:47:18 R55CKREG __j20000 Council Check Register Page - 23 514/2006 -5/4/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 4,83 134972 3335666 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 13.79- 134973 3335662 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6.67- 134974 3335667 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 8.18- 134975 3335535 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 16.00- 134976 3335669 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 8,67- 134977 3335904 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 13.75- 134978 3335903 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 22,177.21 283965 51412006 100119 PING 291.59 MERCHANDISE 00006298 134548 7963793 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 291.59 283988 51412006 111779 PIONEER RESEARCH CORPORATION 521.58 TAR STRIPPER 00001156 134597 184825 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 521.58 TAR STRIPPER 00001156 134598 184826 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 521.58 TAR STRIPPER 00005517 134860 184824 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 1,564.74 283967 514/2006 101223 PLANET FORD 143.58 HANDLES 00005803 134815 121818WFOW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 143.58 283968 5/4/2006 101811 PREMIER FLEET SERVICES 1,563.55 FENCE REPAIR 00005950 134599 18764 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW REVOLVING 1,599.55 FENCE PAINT 00005406 134861 18783 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW REVOLVING 3,163.10 283969 51412006 101032 PRINT SHOP, THE 635.85 NEWSLETTER 00008287 134816 103654 1628.6575 PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS 635.85 283970 5/4/2006 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 31.25 134683 399924 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 283.58 134684 399923 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 104.45 134979 401835 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,112.68 134980 399921 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,794.61 134981 399928 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,326.57 283971 514/2006 100969 PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING ENGINEE 500.00 BACKWASH CONST INSPECT 134600 03034.30 05426.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION PLANT #4 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYST CITY OF EDINA 5/3/2006 9:47:18 R56CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 24 5/4/2006 -5/4/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 795.00 BACKWASH CONST INSPECT 134600 03034.30 05425.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION PLANT #2 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYST 2,000.00 BACKWASH CONST INSPECT 134600 03034.30 05427.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION PLANT #3 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYST 1,050.00 INSPECTION 134601 05023.08 05450.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION WM450 4,345.00 283972 5/412006 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 830.43 ROLL TOWEL, LINERS 00002129 134846 3738 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 830.43 283973 51412006 110484 QPR 720.65 COLD MIX 00005911 134723 54832 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 818.55 COLD MIX 00005911 134724 54823 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 661.52 COLD MIX 00005911 134725 54704 1301.6518 BLACKTOP. GENERAL MAINTENANCE 2,200.72 263974 514/2006 100971 QUALITY WINE 5.60- 134685 697168 -00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 565.75 134685 697168 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 47.43- 134686 698055 -00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 2,389.30 134686 698055.00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING. 1.21 134687 697984 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 9.21- 134688 697983 -00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 465.20 134688 697983 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 8.49- 134689 698056 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 429.31 134689 698056 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 20.80- 134982 697797 -00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 2,129.49 134982 697797 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 23.78- 134983 697798 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 2,432.10 134983 697798 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6.30- 134984 698137 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 639.20 134984 698137 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6.15- 134985 697799 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 624.21 134985 697799-00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3.72- 134986 697169 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 375.45 134986 697169 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 41.11- 134987 698053 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 2,078.65 134987 698053-00 _5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 23.50- 134988 686706 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 20.79- 134989 696580 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 11,912.99 283975 5/41' 101965 QWEST ' CITY O A 5/a s:a7:1a R55CKREG X20000 Council Check Register Page - 25 5/4/2006 -5/4/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 106.08 952 451 -6058 134777 041006 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 112.20 952 920 -8166 134817 8166.4/06 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 218.28 283976 5/4/2006 100974 RAYMOND HAEG PLUMBING 327.90 PLUMBING - SMPSTF 134778 042006 7411.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS PSTF OCCUPANCY 327.90 283977 514/2006 119724 RELINER / DRRAN INC. 807.64 MANHOLE DROP BOWL 00001043 134602 5742 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 807.64 283978 51412006 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 100.00 CLEANED URINAL DRAIN 00006251 134549 42566 5210.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF DOME PROGRAM 100.00 283979 51412006 102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 38.28 HITCH 00005607 134603 1148139 -01 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 38.28 283980 51412006 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 269.27 SOFTENER SALT 00006252 134550 00176069 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 269.27 283981 51412006 101979 ROFIDAL, KEVIN 319.10 UNIFORM PURCHASE 134818 042506 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 319.10 283982 5/4/2006 102040 RYGG, JAMES 69.98 UNIFORM PURCHASE 134819 042606 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 69.98 283983 51412006 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 253.94 PARTS WASHER SERVICE 134779 0031480008 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 121.00 OIL FILTER RECYCLE 134780 0031591770 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 368.85 SORBENT WASTE 134781 0031591769 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 743.79 283984 5/4/2006 101834 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPANY 37.71 BAKERY 00006349 134551 151861 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 37.71 CITY OF EDINA 5/3/2006 9:47:18 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 26 5/4/2006 --5/412006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 283985 51412006 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 33.20 RAFTER CLIPS 00005962 134726 40288176 05453.1705.31 MATERIALSISUPPLIES Chemical Rm. Expansion -plant 4 25.22 LUMBER, SINKER 00001007, 134820 40285251 1375.6530 REPAIR PARTS PARKING RAMP 7.61 LUMBER 00001022 134821 40285842 05453.1705.31 MATERIALSISUPPLIES Chemical Rm. Expansion -plant 4 30.29 ANGLES, HANGERS 00001027 134822 40286699 05453.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES Chemical Rm. Expansion -plant 4 51.23 LUMBER, HANGERS 00001128 134823 40288262 05453.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES Chemical Rm. Expansion -plant 4 8.35 LUMBER 00005632 135037 40266932 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 66.01 LUMBER, SILL SEALER 00005638 135038 40266973 05453.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES Chemical Rm. Expansion -plant 4 244.97 JOIST HANGERS, LUMBER 00005638 135039 40266972 05453.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES Chemical Rm. Expansion -plant 4 50.10 LUMBER 00005632 135040 40265671 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 6.26 LUMBER 00005632 135041 40266666 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 523.24 283986 5/4/2006 100991 SCHWAB- VOLLHABER- LUBRATT 1,034.04 MOTORS 00005997 134604 INV027245 1551.6530 REPAIR PARTS CITY HALL GENERAL 1,034.04 283987 5/412008 102644 SEABOARD PENCIL COMPANY - 522.50 GOLF PENCILS 00005633 135036 5633 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 522.50 283988 51412006 103970 SEEGER, MICHAEL 143.67 K -9 SCHOOL EXPENSES 134824 042806 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 143.67 283989 5/412006 100995 SEH 10,710.41 BID DOC PREPARATION 134605 0144613 05459.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN WM459 59TH ST RAW WATER LINE 2,000.00 INSPECTIONS 134606, 0144612 04316.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION STS -316 SUNNYSLOPE AREA CIPP 5,000.00 INSPECTIONS 134606 0144612 03413.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO SS 5,037.28 INSPECTIONS 134606 0144612 03428.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION SS428 SUNNYSLOPE AREA CIPP 43:00 CITY WORKS 134607 0143840 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 20,930.30 BID DOC PREPARATION 134608 0144610 05451.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN WM451 Nine Mile Village 2,179.26 FEASIBILITY STUDY 134609 0144609 05451.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN WM-451 Nine Mile Village 16,604.62 BID DOC PREPARATION 134610 0144611 05451.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN WM-451 Nine Mlle Village 62,504.87 283990 51412006 101587 SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES 879.00 DIAL- A-RIDE FEB 2006 134825 042606 1514.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DIAL -A -RIDE PROGRAM 879.00 283991 5/4/2006 101380 SHAUGHNESY, SANDRA 79.30 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 134885 042806 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVS "''ES R55CKREG j20000 CITY G 4A Council Check Register 5/4/2006 —5/4/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES CLASS REGISTRATION 5Pc 9:47:18 Page - 27 Business Unit GRILL ART CENTER REVENUES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES CONSULTING DESIGN SIDEWALK INTERLACHEN /BLAKE CONSULTING DESIGN BA-313 70TH & METRO GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 79.30 283992 514/2006 100999 SIGNAL SYSTEMS INC. 158.95 TIME CARDS 00006250 134552 34856 5421.6406 158.95 283993 5/4/2006 119726 SKALICKY, JANET 36.00 CLASS REFUND 134727 042606 5101.4607 36.00 283994 514/2006 119745 SKYHAWKE TECHNOLOGIES LLC 3,035.00 SKY CADDIES 00006081 135042 31934P -IN 5440.5511 3,035.00 283995 5/4/2006 117819 SOUTH OF THE RIVER COMMUNITY B 50.00 PERFORMANCE 517/06 134740 042506 5610.6136 50.00 283996 5/4/2006 110977 SOW, ADAMA 304.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 134886 042806 5110.6103 944.00 CLEANING 134886 042806 5111.6103 1,248.00 283997 5/4/2008 116856 SPRINT 4.85 PHONE CARD 135045 041506 5913.6406 4.85 283998 5/4/2006 101004 SPS COMPANIES 27.34 HACKSAW FRAME 00001119 134826 S1433186.001 5923.6406 27.34 283999 5/4/2006 101016 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 2,213.52 TRANSPORTATION STUDY 134611 5523-6 1500.6103 5,600.97 CIVIL DESIGN 134612 5211 -15 07091.1705.20 4,125.75 PRELIM DESIGN 134613 5656 -1 01313.1705.20 11,940.24 284000 5/4/2006 110976 STAGES THEATRE CO. 62.00 SS PROGRAM 135043 182393 1629.6406 62.00 284001 5/4/2006 119728 STEEL, LARAINE GENERAL SUPPLIES CLASS REGISTRATION 5Pc 9:47:18 Page - 27 Business Unit GRILL ART CENTER REVENUES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES CONSULTING DESIGN SIDEWALK INTERLACHEN /BLAKE CONSULTING DESIGN BA-313 70TH & METRO GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION CITY OF EDINA 502006 9:47:18 R55CKREG L0G20000 Council Check Register Page - 28 5/4/2006 -514/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 100.00 PERFORMANCE 5/9/06 134741 042506 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 100.00 284002 5/412006 101015 STREICHERS 12.67 BELT CLIP ASSEMBLY 00003581 134782 1346370 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 159.75 M3X WBATTERIES 134827 1296894 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,147.17 TRAINING AMMO 00003125 134828 1341590 1400.6551 AMMUNITION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 89.14 FLASHERS 00005190 134829 1347544 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,408.73 284003 5/4/2006 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 200.00 REPAIRS 00005608 134614 CTCS498765 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 200.00 284004 51412006 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 475.00 TRASH /RECYCLE AD 134558 847877 2210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER COMMUNICATIONS 475.00 284005 51412006 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 357.20 WANT AD 134559 845892 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 357.20 284006 51412006 110674 SUPERIOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIO 26.51 CHARGERS 00001030 134615 13640 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 26.51 284007 5/412008 100794 SWANSON, HAROLD 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 134746 050406 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 284008 51412006 101027 TARGET ' 38.60 9- 555 -029 -840 00006256 135044 041806 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 38.60 284009 5/412006 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 682.10 134553 408245 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 244.00 134554 287865 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 4,070.55 134990 408470 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER. VERNON SELLING 73.30 134991 408471 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 370.00 135049 22129 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 5,439.95 CITY O. A 5/1. 9:47:18 R55CKREG 020000 Council Check Register Page - 29 5/4/2006 —5/4/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 284010 514/2006 103331 TILSNER, DONNA 100.00 VAN VALKENBURG - OPENING CASH 134728 042506 4000.1040 CHANGE FUND WORK CAP BALANCE SHEET 100.00 284011 5/4/2006 101474 TITLEIST 2,375.82 GOLF BALLS 00006178 135050 0239398 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 2,375.82 284012 51412006 102742 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLAN 2,401.05 PRELIM DESIGN 134616 000200601541 10091.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BR -3 Browndale Avenue Bridge 4,933.12 PRELIM DESIGN 134617 000200601549 04322.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN STS -322 STORMWATER DREDGING 7,334.17 284013 5/412006 118003 TOMMY BAHAMA 23.60 MERCHANDISE 00006080 135046 8330214 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 849.06 MERCHANDISE 00006080 135047 8329728 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,299.62 MERCHANDISE 00006080 135048 8327556 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 2,172.28 284014 5/412006 101693 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS 420.68 HANDHELD SCANNER 134555 19730 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 420.68 HANDHELD SCANNER 134618 19731 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 841.36 284015 51412006 103982 TRAFFIC CONTROL CORPORATION 890.31 SIGNAL HEAD, PUSH BUTTONS 00001029 134619 20550 1330.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS 890.31 284016 51412006 116277 TRUE FITNESS TECHNOLOGY INC. 41.50 TREADMILL PARTS 00002149 134847 282193 5620.6530 REPAIR PARTS EDINBOROUGH PARK 41.50 284017 514/2006 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 55.38 STAKES 00006466 134783 13947 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 183.71 EROSION BLANKETS 00006468. 134784 13965 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 239.09 284018 51412006. 101053 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY 1,170.10 FIXTURES 00005764 134620 349887 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 1,170.10 284019 5/412008 114236 USA BLUE BOOK R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/4/2006 —5/4/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 761.30 LOCATOR 00001141 134621 153357 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POSTAGE CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES PRINTING ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER TELEPHONE SAFETY EQUIPMENT 5/3/2006 9:47:18 Page - 30 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL COLLECTION SYSTEMS DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION CENT SVC PW BUILDING ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT ADAPTIVE RECREATION 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING` POLICE DEPT. GENERAL .. GENERAL MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING CONSULTING DESIGN SIDEWALK INTERLACHEN /BLAKE 761.30 284020 5/412006 100050 LISPS- HASLER 4,000.00 ACCT #75983 134622 042406 1550.6235 4,000.00 284021 5/412006 103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 1,884.50 SEWER MAIN REPAIR 00001048 134623 10641 5923.6180 . 1,691.50 WATER MAIN REPAIR 00001050 134862 10667 5913.6180 2,215.49 WATER MAIN REPAIR 00001051 134863 10671 5913.6180 5,791.49 264022 514/2006 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 288.28 PAPER SUPPLIES 00001124 134624 631517 1552.6511 67.89 TOWELS 00009199 134729 631384 5111.6511 356.17 284023 5/4/2006 106308 VEITH, MICHELLE 1,100.00 ARSLE BROCHURE 134830 6001 1629.6575 1,100.00 284024 5/412006 101610 VERIZON DIRECTORIES CORP. 14.00 DIRECTORY ADVERTISING 134556 390010714313 5822.6122 14.00 DIRECTORY ADVERTISING 134556 390010714313 5842.6122 14.00 DIRECTORY ADVERTISING 134556 390010714313 5862.6122 42.00 284025 5/412006 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS 517.45 134831 3673190106 1400.6188 517.45 284026 51412006 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 764.12 SAFETY VESTS 00001028 134625 173929 1301.6610 764.12 284027 51412006 119454 VINOCOPIA 211.50 134690 0000281 -IN 5822.5513 211.50 284028 51412006 100023 VOGEL, ROBERT C. 2,000.00 HISTORICAL REVIEW 134626 26015 07091.1705.20 POSTAGE CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES PRINTING ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER TELEPHONE SAFETY EQUIPMENT 5/3/2006 9:47:18 Page - 30 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL COLLECTION SYSTEMS DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION CENT SVC PW BUILDING ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT ADAPTIVE RECREATION 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING` POLICE DEPT. GENERAL .. GENERAL MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING CONSULTING DESIGN SIDEWALK INTERLACHEN /BLAKE CITY O. A 5/3. 9:47:18 R55CKREG .20000 Council Check Register Page - 31 514/2006 -5/4/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,000.00 284029 51412006 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 62.36 LIGHTING 00001149 134632 15043653 -00 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 118.22 LIGHTING 00001149 134632 15043653-00 1375.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKING RAMP 180.58 284030 5/412006 101080 WALSH, WILLIAM 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 134745 050406 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 284031 5/4/2006 119730 WEB ELECTRIC 1,343.58 REPAIR ELECTRIC SYSTEM 00008016 134785 845 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,343.58 284032 51412006 103266 WELSH COMPANIES LLC 554.93 MAY MAINTENANCE 134786 050106 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY 554.93 284033 514/2006 102342 WENZEL, KENNETH 240.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 134887 042806 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 240.00 284034 51412006 105201 WERRE, BOB 505.00 GOLF CLUBS 00006109 134557 1435 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 505.00 284035 51412006 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 2,158.45 134691 139709 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 702.90 134692 140079-00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 789.75 134992 140175-00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 566.90 134993 140083-00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 9.00- 134994 138255 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 49.00- 134995 138369-00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,160.00 284036 51412006 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 515.43 134693 155032 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1.03 134694 155030 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 659.33 134996 155712 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 530.18 134997 155709 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 453.03 134998 155710 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA 5/3/2006 9:47:18 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 32 5/4/2006 -- 5/4/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,863.47 134999 155711 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,666.35- 135000 27055 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 96.00- 135001 28113 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,260.12 284037 5/4/2006 112954 WISCONSIN TURF EQUIPMENT CORP. 29.16 ELBOW ADAPTER 00006452 134787 523755-000 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 29.16 284038 5/4/2006 101084 WM. H. MCCOY PETROLEUM FUELS 1 24.01 KEROSENE 00005193 134833 168780 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 139.01 KEROSENE 00006476 135054 168911 5423.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF CARS 163.02' 284039 514/2006 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 2,143.00 134695 177987 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,245.50 134696 177803 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 84.00- 134697 177954 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,282.50 135002 178062 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 274.00 135003 178200 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4,861.00 284040 5/4/2006 101087 WROBLESKI, HENRY 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 134749 050406 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 284041 5/4/2006 105740 WSB &ASSOCIATES INC. 7,053.50 PRELIM DESIGN 134627 2 -2006 01336.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA336 W70TH - FRANCE TO YORK 7,053.50 284042 51412006 101726 XCEL ENERGY 57.99 51- 4420190 -3 134730 66295048 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 1,714.69 51- 5547446 -1 134731 66324116 1628.6185 LIGHT & POWER SENIOR CITIZENS 398.68 51- 5005454 -3 134732 66305875 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 1,319.13 51- 6223269 -1 134733 66176531 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM . 80.71 51. 4197645 -8 134734 66127144 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 990.94 51- 5107681 134735 66152529 5111.6185 LIGHT & POWER ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 7.97 51- 6541084 -2 134846 66508629 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 29.78 51- 6892224 -5 134849 66518275 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 69.10 51- 6692497-0 134850 66514986 1460.6185 LIGHT & POWER CIVILIAN DEFENSE 100.16 51. 4621797 -2 134851 66455771 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 128.43 51 -4197645 -8 134852 66476553 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL R55CKREG .20000 Check # Date Amount 4,421.40 29,419.03 6,514.29 13,244.21 58,496.51 284043 5/412008 104.00 57.38 161.38 564,178.73 Supplier / Explanation 51- 6840050.6 51- 4621797 -2 51- 6955679 -8 51- 5605640 -1 100568 XEROX CORPORATION MARCH USAGE COPIER MAINTENANCE Grand Total 134736 016642319 5110.6151 134834 016609430 1628.6103 Subledger Account Description LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 564,178.73 Total Payments 564,178.73 EQUIPMENT RENTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 513. 9:47:18 Page - 33 Business Unit PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR CITY HALL GENERAL DISTRIBUTION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION SENIOR CITIZENS CITY O % Council Check Register 514/2006 —514/2006 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 134853 66371759 5911.6185 135051 66616371 1321.6185 135052 66676555 1551.6185 135053 66655102 5913.6185 134736 016642319 5110.6151 134834 016609430 1628.6103 Subledger Account Description LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 564,178.73 Total Payments 564,178.73 EQUIPMENT RENTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 513. 9:47:18 Page - 33 Business Unit PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR CITY HALL GENERAL DISTRIBUTION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION SENIOR CITIZENS R55CKSUM LOG20000 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 191,097.18 02100 CDBG FUND 48.00 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 3,132.75 . 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 13,455.97 04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND 14,127.77 05100 ART CENTER FUND 14,977.84 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 2,637.53 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 3,023.15 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 28,507.24 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 2,137.34 05600 EDINBOROUGW/CENT LAKES FUND 5,232.14 05800 LIQUOR FUND 167,492.78 05900 UTILITY FUND 107,375.36 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 10,527.16 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 406.52 Report Totals 564,178.73 CITY OF EDINA 5/3/2006 9:49:08 Council Check Summary Page - 1 5/4/2006 - 514/2006 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief,, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing pglicies and Procedures CITY G. AA 5/1, 14:21:59 R55CKREG _j20000 Council Check Register Page - 1 5/11/2006 - 5/11/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 284044 5/11/2006 100612 A.M. LEONARD 104.85 PRUNER SHEARS 00002361 135497 0214921200033 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 186.70 SOIL KNIVES, BOOT &SHOE CLEANED0002361 135496 0214921200017 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 291.55 284045 5/1112006 100613 AAA 1,247.96 PLATES, TAX FOR 47.214 135158 050306 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,065.87 PLATES, TAX FOR 26.189 135159 05/03 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,357.54 PLATES, TAX FOR 70.289. 135278 050406 5900.1735 AUTOMOBILES & TRUCKS UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 339.38 PLATES, TITLE FOR 44.522 135419 050506 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 975.70 PLATES, TITLE FOR 70.290 135420 5/4 5900.1735 AUTOMOBILES & TRUCKS UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 4,986.45 284046 5/1112006 102403 AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT 47.92 DIRT 00005879 135160 23601 1643.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT GENERAL TURF CARE 47.92 284047 511112006 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 11.56 135209 606046 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 51.98 135210 600223 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 102.58 135462 606036 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 166.12 284046 511112006 102191 ADVANCED GRAPHIC SYSTEMS INC. 158.04 TONER 135055 INV00067726 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 158.04 284049 5/11/2006 102128 AEARO CO. 140.00 SAFETY GLASSES 00005576 135161 03193420 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 140.00 284050 511112006 102626 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES 311.51 READY MIX 00005917 135421 4146934 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 335.49 READY MIX 00005917 135422 4146561 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 647.00 284051 5/1112006 111228 ALDEN POOL & MUNICIPAL SUPPLY 11,048.31 CHEMICAL FEED EQUIPMENT 00005694 135162 600202 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 11,048.31 284052 5111/2006 105262 ALEX AIR APPARATUS INC. 95.85 SCBA REPAIRS 135423 10600 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 5/11/2006 - 5/1112006 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1500.6406 5421.5510 5430.5510 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PRINTING GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD 5/10/2006 14:21:59 Page- 2 Business Unit ENGINEERING GENERAL ED ADMINISTRATION CONTINGENCIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE. CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CONTINGENCIES GRILL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 4401.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 95.85 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5440.5511 284053 5/11/2006 5440.5511 116355 ALIGNEX INC. PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 252.94 SOFTWARE INSTALLATION 135056 3329 1260.6103 252.94 284054 5/1112006 102715 ALLEGRA PRINT & IMAGING 95.85 CALENDARS 00002383 135499 60454 5610.6575 133.13 VOLUNTEER REC PROGRAMS - 135523 60552 1500.6406 284059 5111/2006 228.98 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 284055 5111/2006 COFFEE 100665 AMSAN BRISSMAN - KENNEDY 135370 401631 103.27 127.50 CLEANERS, TOWELS 00001245 135163 090378-00 1646.6406 5/1112006 127.50 284056 511112006 100630 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC. APPL FOUR 34,602.76 654.84 COPIER PAPER 135057 10053600 -00 1550.6406 1500.6406 5421.5510 5430.5510 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PRINTING GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD 5/10/2006 14:21:59 Page- 2 Business Unit ENGINEERING GENERAL ED ADMINISTRATION CONTINGENCIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE. CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CONTINGENCIES GRILL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 4401.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 654.84 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5440.5511 284057 5/11/2006 5440.5511 101124 ANDY'S MARKET & DELI PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 2,988.00 VOLUNTEER REC CATERING 135524 050106 2,988.00 284056 5/11/2006 102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE 784.97 FOOD 00006333 135369 561835 784.97 284059 5111/2006 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 103.27 COFFEE 00006331 135370 401631 103.27 284060 5/1112006 102754 ARNT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC 34,602.76 GYM CONSTRUCTION 135342 APPL FOUR 34,602.76 284061 5/11/2006 102134 ASHWORTH INC. 2,676.28 MERCHANDISE 00006188 135371 690451 32.11 MERCHANDISE 00006188 135372 721029 486.12 MERCHANDISE 00006485 135373 713783 180.33 MERCHANDISE 00006485 135374 678943 692.70 MERCHANDISE 00006188 135375 690420 4,067.54 1500.6406 5421.5510 5430.5510 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PRINTING GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD 5/10/2006 14:21:59 Page- 2 Business Unit ENGINEERING GENERAL ED ADMINISTRATION CONTINGENCIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE. CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CONTINGENCIES GRILL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 4401.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES J6 14:21:59 Page - 3 Business Unit PSTF OCCUPANCY RICHARDS GOLF COURSE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS TREES & MAINTENANCE 800 MHZ RADIO PATHS & HARD SURFACE PATHS & HARD SURFACE 4,973.12 ABOUT TOWN AD SALES COMM 135058 2006 -3 CITY ANA COMMUNICATIONS R55CKREG -JG20000 284069 5/11/2006 119750 BARNETT, RANDY L Council Check Register 3,500.00 COURSE DEVELOP /INSTRUCTION 5/11/2006 - 5/11/2006 7411.6103 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 284062 5/11/2006 284070 5111/2006 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 153.16 TRASH/RECYCLING 135376 050106 7411.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 153.16 135212 36937200 5822.5513 284063 511112006 72.13 101954 AUGIE'S INC. 135213 41431700 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 49.48 FOOD 00006324 135377 3628 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 49.48 284064 5/11/2006 284071 5111/2006 101155 AUTOMATIC GARAGE DOORS FIREPL 220.99 GARAGE DOOR REPAIR 00008023 135500 1624706 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 220.99 284065 511112006 100638 BACHMAN'S 298.20 TREES 00001946 135164 260323-001 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES 298.20 284066 5/1112006 118140 BAILIWICK DATA SYSTEMS INC. 250.00 DEVICE INSTALLATION SERVICES 135127 6241 44003.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 250.00 284067 5/11/2006 100642 BANNERS TO GO 21.30 SIGNS 00001152 135165 21605 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 191.70 SIGNS 00005892 135166 21603 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 213.00 284068 5/11/2006 105016 BARBEAU MARKETING GROUP INC. J6 14:21:59 Page - 3 Business Unit PSTF OCCUPANCY RICHARDS GOLF COURSE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS TREES & MAINTENANCE 800 MHZ RADIO PATHS & HARD SURFACE PATHS & HARD SURFACE 4,973.12 ABOUT TOWN AD SALES COMM 135058 2006 -3 2210.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 4,973.12 284069 5/11/2006 119750 BARNETT, RANDY L 3,500.00 COURSE DEVELOP /INSTRUCTION 135128 050206 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 3,500.00 284070 5111/2006 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 127,10 135211 41418900 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 329.60 135212 36937200 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 72.13 135213 41431700 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 152.00 135463 36987000 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 680.83 284071 5111/2006 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. CITY OF EDINA 5/10/2006 14:21:59 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 4 5/11/2006 - 5111/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,092.33 LAWN CARE 135378 11194 7411.6136 SNOW & LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY 1,092.33 284072 5111/2006 100645 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 111.42 OFFICE SUPPLIES 135129 OE -48993 -1 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 66.18 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001129 135130 OE- 49050 -1 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 17.10 OFFICE SUPPLIES 135131 WO- 402874 -1 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 109.05- RETURN 135132 CP- WO- 400562 -1 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING 39.94- RETURN 135133 CP- OE- 47387 -1 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING 30.28 INDEX TABS, MARKERS 00001265 135279 WO- 402953 -1 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 24.53 RIBBONS 135280 WO- 403299 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 34.60- CREDIT 135281 CP- WO- 401611 -1 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 192.89 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003143 135424 W0 -403327 -1 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 163.92 BINDERS 00003577 135425 OE- 49501 -1 1470.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 36.98 OFFICE SUPPLIES 135525 WO- 400493 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 71.32 OFFICE SUPPLIES 135526 OE- 44161 -1 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING 531.03 264073 5/11/2006 119431 BLINK BONNIE 79.10 BOX LUNCHES 135527 041806 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 79.10 284074 5/1112006 119631 BONNER & BORHART LLP 15,000.00 PROSECUTING 135167 26498 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES 15,000.00 284075 5111/2006 101010 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 30.42 RETRACT KNIVES 00001168 135059 95160014 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,047.79 BALLASTS, LIGHTING 00001168 135059 95160014 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 1,078.21 284076 5111/2006 101516 BRAEMAR PRINTING 102.72 JUNIOR TICKETS 00006266 135379 00028532 5430.6575 PRINTING RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 102.72 284077 5/11/2006 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 1,212.05 SOIL TESTING 135426 261289 05427.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION PLANT #3 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYST 1,212.05 284078 5/11/2006 100667 BROCK WHITE COMF ,4Y 904.29 MORTAR, EMACO 00001146 135060 11489391 -00 1375.6530 REPAIR PARTS PARKING RAMP 150.11 MORTAR 00001183 136282 11492075 -0P 1375.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKING RAMP R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY . NA S 6 14:21:59 Council Check Register Page - 5 5111/2006 - 5/11/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,054.40. 284079 5/11/2006 100391 CALL ONE INC. 10498 TRISTAR 00003138 135134 764232 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 4401.6710 5101.4607 1400.6203 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 104.98 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 284080 5111/2006 YORK SELLING 119466 CAMELOT METALS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 72,636.00 GYM CONSTRUCTION 135343 APPL 4 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 72,636.00 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 284081 5111/2006 DISTRIBUTION 119752 CAMERON, SHARON ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 21.00 CLASS REFUND 135283 050206 21.00 284082 5111/2006 101788 CAMPBELL, RICHARD 338.51 UNIFORM PURCHASE 135350 050406 338.51 284083 5/11/2006 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 59.25 135214 00100007 3,548.50 135215 952330 21.00 135216 00100008 225.00 135217 910728 790.90 135218 952326 25.35 135219 00100004 4,670.00 284084 5/1112006 100679 CARLSON TRACTOR & EQUIPMENT 442.53 KNIFE PACKAGE 00005484 135284 S15058 442.53 284085 5/11/2006 100681 CATCO 1,101.45 HYDRAULIC REPAIRS 00001258 135168 1 -05794 1,101.45 284086 511112006 101515 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO. 35.93 CURB & GUTTER, EDGER 00001170 135285 1089105 35.93 284087 5/11/2006 103040 CITY PAGES 80.66 ADVERTISING 135061 100150899 80.66 ADVERTISING 135061 100150899 4401.6710 5101.4607 1400.6203 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING R56CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/10/2006 14:21:59. Council Check Register Page - 6 5/11/2006 -- 5/11/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 80.68 ADVERTISING 135061 100150899 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 242.00 284088 5/1112006 105693 CITYSPRINT 143.70 COURIER 135062 1048 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT- CENT SERV GEN -. MIS 143.70 284089 5/1112006 100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP. 59.47 SWITCH 00001240 135063 100175 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 59.47 284090 5/11/2006 101936 CLARK PRODUCTS INC. 118.76 CONCESSION PRODUCT 135351 V558287 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 118.76' 284091 511112006 102165 CLEVELAND GOLF 68.68 MERCHANDISE 00006104 135380 2165624SO 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 68.68 284092 5/11/2006 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 135.44 EARMUFFS, EAR PLUGS 00001163 135064 02803366 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT. GENERAL MAINTENANCE 38.64 GLOVES 00001131 135169 02801062 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 210.60 GLOVES, BROOMS, BANDAGES 00001181 135286 02805386 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 384.68 284093 5/11/2006 101329 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC. 412.16 MASON LINE, REBAFt 00001159 135427 M078604 05453.1705.31 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES Chemical Rm. Expansion -plant 4 412.16 284094 5/11/2006 118633 CORBAN GROUP, THE 1,680.00 RFP CONSULTING 135352 2006 -808 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,680.00 284095 511112006 100513 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES IN 2,742.38 CUSTODIAL SERVICE 135528 106986 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 2,742.38 284096 5/11/2006 100701 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. 107.84 TIRES 00002346 135501 134581 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 107.84 - 284097 5/11/2006 100703 CUSTOM FIRE APPARATUS R55CKRE(-. -)G20000 4,336.20 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER CITY INA GRILL 931.40 GRILL 135221 Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD 5,267.60 5/11/2006 - 5/11/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 214415 193.44 GAS CYLINDERS 00003589 135428 11163 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 193.44 BAKERY 00006329 135383 214604 284098 5/11/2006 BAKERY 100709 DANS REGISTER SERVICE 214672 110.85 79.26 RIBBON, CHECK CASH REGISTER 135066 050106 4075.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 79.26 4,648.55 APRIL 2006 135530 050506 284099 511112006 4,648.55 116797 DAUGHTON, ELIZABETH 284103 5111/2006 I 16 14:21:59 Page - 7 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL VANVALKENBURG 79.00 CLASS REFUND 135353 050206 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 79.00 284100 5/11/2006 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING 5842.5514 5822.5514 5421.5510 5421.5510 5421.5510 5421.5510 1495.4380 2210.6575 1301.6201 1646.6103 1646.6103 4401.6710 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 4,336.20 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 135220 360480 GRILL 931.40 GRILL 135221 360479 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5,267.60 284101 511112006 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 28.76 BAKERY 00006329 135381 214415 21.71 BAKERY 00006329 135382 214422 31.99 BAKERY 00006329 135383 214604 28.39 BAKERY 00006329 135384 214672 110.85 284102 5111/2006 100899 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 4,648.55 APRIL 2006 135530 050506 4,648.55 284103 5111/2006 111120 DESIGN N PRINT 154.94 ASSESSMENT FLYERS 135067 32140 154.94 284104 5/11/2006 101986 DIBBLE, DON 46.46 2006 UNIFORM PURCHASE 135287 050206 46.46 284105 5/1112006 102934 DON HARSTAD CO INC 212.50 KEYLESS ENTRY DOOR REPAIR 00007078 135288 121942 127.50 KEYLESS ENTRY DOOR REPAIR 00007079 135289 121943 340.00 284106 511112006 119120 DONLAR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 11,600.34 GYM CONSTRUCTION 135344 APPL 6 5842.5514 5822.5514 5421.5510 5421.5510 5421.5510 5421.5510 1495.4380 2210.6575 1301.6201 1646.6103 1646.6103 4401.6710 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL SURCHARGE INSPECTIONS PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR CITY OF EDINA 5/10/2006 14:21:59 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 8 5/11/2006 — 5/11/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 11,600.34 284107. 5/11/2006 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 13,698.90 LEGAL 135065 1317904 1195.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES 13,698.90 284108 5/11/2006 100739 EAGLE WINE 809.57 135222 403996 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 702.58 135464 403993 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE . 50TH ST SELLING 1,512.15 284109 511112006 100741 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 3,599.00 135223 329995 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 78.60 135385 218981 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 165.00 135386 CUST 146900 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 6,022.50 135465 320014 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 9,865.10 284110 5/11/2006 119716 EASTERN PACIFIC APPAREL INC. 36.70 MERCHANDISE 00006088 135387 338153 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 36.70 284111 5/11/2006 119729 ECKMAN, PETER 150.00 PERFORMANCE 5/16/06 135290 050106 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 284112 5/1112006 106340 EDINA CAR WASH - 149.10 APRIL WASHES 135354 2517 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 149.10. 284113 5/11/2006 102340 EDMUNDS, LIZ 122.30 135224 858 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 122.30 284114 5H1/2006 100746 ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR 113.42 FASCO MOTOR 00001148 135170 337825 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 113.42 284115 5/1112006 119119 ELECTRONIC RESOURCE CONTRACTOR 30,400.00 GYM CONSTRUCTION 135345 APPL 6 4401.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR 30,400.00 5A 14:21:59 Page - 9 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS 4 930 20 APRIL TRANSPORTS 135430 050406 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 4,930.20 284119 5/1112006 100297 FAST FOTO & DIGITAL 10 66 PHOTO FINISHING 00003532 135431 3532 -T2 -23340 1470.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 10.66 CITY G IA R55CKREG _ _d20000 511112006 113720 FASTENER PLACE 59.64 BOLT KIT Council Check Register 17936 1375.6530 REPAIR PARTS 59.64 5/11/2006 — 5/11/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 284116 5/11/2006 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC 64.31 SHIPPING CHARGES 135071 3-472 -27484 2210.6235 856.39 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003586 135429 INV827123 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 856.39 284122 511112006 101621 FLEX- 0-LITE INC. 284117 5111/2006 105339 ENRGI 2,058.00 DUAL COAT BEADS 00001169 135171 64901 1335.6532 861.25 WEBSITE GRAPHICS 135068 4226 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT 481.25 WEBSITE DEVELOPMENT 135069 4233 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT 255.00 WEBSITE DEVELOPMENT 135070 4237 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT 5820694800018 1400.6203 243.75 WEBSITE GRAPHICS 135135 4249 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT 5828391000014 1400.6203 1,350.00 WEBSITE REDEVELOPMENT 135136 4247 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT 5828880300024 1400.6203 3,191.25 294.56 284118 5/11/2006 100018 EXPERT T BILLING 5111/2006 119121 GENERAL SHEET METAL 5A 14:21:59 Page - 9 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS 4 930 20 APRIL TRANSPORTS 135430 050406 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 4,930.20 284119 5/1112006 100297 FAST FOTO & DIGITAL 10 66 PHOTO FINISHING 00003532 135431 3532 -T2 -23340 1470.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PARKING RAMP COMMUNICATIONS PAVEMENT MARKINGS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 7,144.00 GYM CONSTRUCTION 135346 APPL 5 4401.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR 7,144.00 10.66 284120 511112006 113720 FASTENER PLACE 59.64 BOLT KIT 00001172 135291 17936 1375.6530 REPAIR PARTS 59.64 284121 5/11/2006 100756 FEDERAL EXPRESS 64.31 SHIPPING CHARGES 135071 3-472 -27484 2210.6235 POSTAGE 64.31 284122 511112006 101621 FLEX- 0-LITE INC. 2,058.00 DUAL COAT BEADS 00001169 135171 64901 1335.6532 PAINT 2,058.00 284123 5/1112006 102456 GALLS INC. 35.99 SOFT TRUNK ORGANIZER 135137 5820694800018 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 57.57 T- SHIRTS 135138 5828391000014 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 201.00 UNIFORMS 135139 5828880300024 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 294.56 284124 5111/2006 119121 GENERAL SHEET METAL PARKING RAMP COMMUNICATIONS PAVEMENT MARKINGS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 7,144.00 GYM CONSTRUCTION 135346 APPL 5 4401.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR 7,144.00 CITY OF EDINA 5/10/2006 14:21:59 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 10 5/11/2006 - 5/11/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 284125 511112006 100920 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY - MINNEA 372.56 AUTO PARTS 135531 043006 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 372.56 284126 5/11/2006 101344 GLENN REHBEIN COMPANIES 1,544.25 FERTILIZER, CHEMICALS 00005876 135292 9628 1643.6540 FERTILIZER GENERAL TURF CARE 1,192.80 FERTILIZER 00005875 135293 9622 1643.6540 FERTILIZER GENERAL TURF CARE 2,737.05 284127 5111/2006 118941 GLOBALSTAR USA 57.17 R -91 CELL 135432 1171758 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 57.17 284128 511112006 119737 GLOCK INC. 245.00 GUN PARTS 00003078 135140 288692 1400.6551 AMMUNITION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 275.00 INSTRUCTOR'S WORKSHOP 135294 027534 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 275.00 INSTRUCTOR'S WORKSHOP 135295 027536 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 100.00 ARMORER'S COURSE 135296 100100 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 100.00 ARMORER'S COURSE 135297 027537 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 275.00 INSTRUCTOR'S WORKSHOP 135298 027537 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 275.00 INSTRUCTOR'S WORKSHOP 135299 027532 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 100.00 ARMORER'S COURSE 135300 027532 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 275.00 INSTRUCTOR'S WORKSHOP 135301 027544 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 100.00 ARMORER'S COURSE 135302 027544 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 275.00 INSTRUCTOR'S WORKSHOP 135303 027552 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 100.00 ARMORER'S COURSE 135304 027552 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 100.00 ARMORER'S COURSE 135305 027530 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 275.00 INSTRUCTOR'S WORKSHOP 135306 027530 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 100.00 ARMORER'S COURSE 135307 027535 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 275.00 INSTRUCTOR'S WORKSHOP 135308 027535 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 100.00 ARMORER'S COURSE 135309 027520 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 100.00 ARMORER'S COURSE 135310 027529 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 275.00 INSTRUCTOR'S WORKSHOP 135311 027529 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5.33 SPRING CUPS 00003078 135355 291626 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 3,625.33 284129 5111/2006 119749 GOLTZ, GREG 5,500.00 COURSE INSTRUCTION 135141 043006 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 5,500.00 284130 511112006 101103 GRAINGER 92.14 PAINT 00001157 135172 9086391225 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTE' "'E Subledger Account Description REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES 5/11 14:21:59 Page - 11 Business Unit PARKING RAMP PARKING RAMP PARKING RAMP BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR CITY OI COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR R55CKREG _ X20000 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING Council Check Register 5/11/2006 - 5/11/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 24.77 BULL POINTS 00001145 135173 9088964524 1375.6530 24.77 BULL POINTS 00001145 135174 9089078969 1375.6530 37.16 BULL POINTS 00001145 135175 9089404413 1375.6406 18.59 WALL SWITCH KEY 00001143 135176 9084708016 1646.6530 153.99 SAFETY HARNESS, LANYARD 00001143 135176 9084708016 1301.6610 36.51- CREDIT 00001145 135177 9088964532 1301.6406 314.91 284131 5111/2006 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 353.50 135466 81529 5842.5513 353.50 284132 5/11/2006 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 82.01 PVC CONDUIT, GFCI'S 00001123 135178 916950705 1646.6530 82.01 284133 5/1112006 100785 GREUPNER, JOE 17,888.00 GROUP LESSONS 135388 050406 5410.6132 17,888.00 284134 5/11/2006 100782 GRIGGS COOPER S CO. 149.12 135225 403999 5842.5515 2,286.95 135226 402589 5842.5512 4,224.84 135227 403998 5842.5512 180.94 135228 403995 5822.5512 137.14 135229 399919 5862.5515 32.80- 135230 690888 5842.5512 60.00- 135231 690877 5842.5512 6,886.19 284135 511112006 104482 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 2,397.00 REPLACE LIGHT POLES 00001160 135072 6- 3 -26 -1 1322.6180 2,100.00 PROVIDE BOOM TRUCK 00005412 135179 6.3 -26 -2 1322.6180 2,050.00 PROVIDE BOOM TRUCK 00001190 135312 6- 3 -26 -3 1322.6180 6,547.00 284136 5/1112006 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS 117.04 REGISTER TAPE 00007516 135073 247286 5861.6406 117.04 284137 5111/2006 100797 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT 2,020.02 CHEMICALS 00005311 135074 801674 5915.6586 Subledger Account Description REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES 5/11 14:21:59 Page - 11 Business Unit PARKING RAMP PARKING RAMP PARKING RAMP BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL VERNON OCCUPANCY WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 213,750.00 284141 511112006 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURI 476.06 FIELD MARKING PAINT 00005874 135180 CITY OF EDINA 1642.6544 5/10/2006 14:21:59 R55CKREG LOG20000 476.06 284142 5/11/2006 Council Check Register 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS Page - 12 5111/2006 - 5/11/2006 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 135313 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,020.02 284143 5/11/2006 101732 INDUSTRIAL DOOR CO. INC.' 284138 511112006 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION 50.00 TRIP CHARGE 135434 0112406 -IN 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT 185.50 RADIO ADMIN FEE 135075 26038077 1553.6237 RADIO SERVICE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,957.68 RADIO ADMIN FEE 135142 26038015 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,779.54 RADIO ADMIN FEE 135433 26038014 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1265.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 3,922.72 40.14 284139 5111/2006 115377 HENRICKSEN PSG 511112006 101861 J.H. LARSON COMPANY 55.00 REPAIR TO HOLGA FILE 135143 352393 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 55.00 243.95 WIRE, TAP DRILL 00001244 135181 4037703 -01 284140 5/11/2006 CENT SVC PW BUILDING 118948 HINES & SONS INC. 520.65 213 750.00 GYM CONSTRUCTION 135347 APPL 7 4401.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR 213,750.00 284141 511112006 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURI 476.06 FIELD MARKING PAINT 00005874 135180 71335 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 476.06 284142 5/11/2006 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS 177.55 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 135313 050106 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 177.55 284143 5/11/2006 101732 INDUSTRIAL DOOR CO. INC.' 50.00 TRIP CHARGE 135434 0112406 -IN 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 50.00 284144 5111/2006 116191 INSTY- PRINTS 40.14 NE EDINA STUDY FLYER 135532 73259 1265.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 40.14 284145 511112006 101861 J.H. LARSON COMPANY 276.70 CONDUIT, COUPLINGS 00001174 135076 4037042 -01 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 243.95 WIRE, TAP DRILL 00001244 135181 4037703 -01 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 520.65 284146 5/1112006 100828 JERRY'S FOODS 6.68 135389 043006 1400.6106 MEETING EXPENSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 12.75 135389 043006 1470.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 47.34 135389 043006 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 69.93 135389 043006 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREP- `I R55CKREG LuG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation CITY O. A Council Check Register 5/11/2006 - 5/11/2006 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 135389 043006 5421.5510 261.34 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5512 284147 5/11/2006 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 8,98 5842.5515 135314 043006 12,83 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 135314 043006 17.27 YORK SELLING 135314 043006 25.53 5842.5512 135314 043006 35.98 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 135314 043006 36.36 YORK SELLING 135314 043006 40.07 5842.5513 135314 043006 43.79 135314 043006 50.85 135314 043006 54.86 135314 043006 61.40 135314 043006 64.53 135314 043006 73.20 135314 043006 90.30 135314 043006 187.64 135314 043006 666.06 135314 043006 1,181.57 135314 043006 2,651.22 284148 5/1112006 100830 JERRY'S PRINTING 41.54 SOFTBALL SCORE CARDS 135144 36303 41.54 284149 5/11/2006 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 594.15 135467 1070925 5,952.77 135468 1070922 1,274.67 135469 1070924 66.56 135470 1070923 349.62 135471 1070919 34.13 135472 1070921 1,337.69 135473 1070920 3.860.22 135474 1069400 500.48 135475 1069401 142.52- 135476 309493 28.35- 135477 309648 24.75- 135478 309494 13,774.67 5820.6406 5511.6406 4090.6406 1552.6406 1551.6406 1322.6406 5420.6406 5630.6406 1260.6406 5422.6406 1400.6406 1553.6406 5620.6406 1470.6406 5913.6406 1646.6406 1301.6406 4077.6406 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 5/1, 14:21:59 Page - 13 Business Unit GRILL 50TH STREET GENERAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS STREET REVOLVING CENT SVC PW BUILDING CITY HALL GENERAL STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL CLUB HOUSE CENTENNIAL LAKES ENGINEERING GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EOUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EDINBOROUGH PARK FIRE DEPT. GENERAL DISTRIBUTION BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5/10/2006 14:21:59 Page - 14 Business Unit ULUt3 MUUAt UTILITY REVENUES CITY HALL GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY 74.72 GLOVES 00006111 135391 2358618 CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP R55CKREG LOG20000 74.72 284156 5/11/2006 105887 KOESSLER, JOE Council Check Register 153.00 5/11/2006 - 5/11/2006 040106 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 284150 5111/2006 SENIOR CITIZENS 103230 JOHNSTONS SALES & SERVICE 134.99 VACUUM REPAIR 00006248 135390 734241 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS 134.99 252.41 TROPHIES 00008020 135080 60418 284151 5/11/2006 ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 119754 KAL43OR UNDERGROUND INC. 465.15 HYDRANT USAGE FEE 135356 050206 5901.4626 SALE OF WATER 465.15 284152 5111/2006 100839 KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES 165.03 BALL BEARINGS 00001161 135315 U938098 1551.6530 REPAIR PARTS 165.03 284153 5111/2006 111018 KEEPRS INC. 104.26 UNIFORMS 06003542 135077 51053-01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS 83.95 UNIFORMS 00003574 135078 51659 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS 89.95 UNIFORM 00003502 135435 50506 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS 172.85 UNIFORM 00003531 135436 51754 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS 20.95 UNIFORM 00003542 135437 51053 -02 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS 162.79 UNIFORM BADGES 00003539 135438 49807. 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS 57.30 UNIFORM 00003535 135439 51334 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS_ 692.05 284154 5/11/2006 114276 KELLEHER, KEVIN 40.63 CERTIFICATES, STAPLER 135079 050106 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 130.98 VCR/DVD PLAYER 135079 050106 7411.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 251.34 DAVANNI'S 135079 050106 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES . 422.95 284155 5/11/2006 116295 KING PAR CORPORATION 5/10/2006 14:21:59 Page - 14 Business Unit ULUt3 MUUAt UTILITY REVENUES CITY HALL GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY 74.72 GLOVES 00006111 135391 2358618 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 74.72 284156 5/11/2006 105887 KOESSLER, JOE 153.00 APRIL 2006 SERVICE 135145 040106 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 153.00 MAY 2006 SERVICE 135146 050106 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 306.00 284157 5/11/2006 101995 KUDOS INC. 252.41 TROPHIES 00008020 135080 60418 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 252.41 284158 5/4' '16 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS J6 14:21:59 Page- 15 Business Unit POLICE FORFEITURE INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS PSTF OCCUPANCY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ASSESSING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING ASSESSING ASSESSING 6,260.65 135234 926339 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER CITY )INA 135235 R55CKREG _OG20000 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 9,458.55 135480 928719 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 15,799.40 Council Check Register 284166 5/11/2006 103280 MARLIN COMPANY, THE 5111/2006 - 5/11/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 258.33 DWI TOWS 135316 050306 4601.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 258.33 284159 5/11/2006 100605 LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS 96.01 UNIFORMS 135147 04751942 1495.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS 47.05 UNIFORMS 135148 04719669 1495.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS 143.06 284160 5/11/2006 116260 LAW ENFORCEMENT TARGETS INC. 146.73 BULLSEYE TARGETS 135149 0069870 -IN 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 146.73 284161 5111/2006 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 434.01 DRILL BITS, MICRO TORCH 00001138 135081 4350900 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 117.65 CABLE TIES 00001140 135082 4350901 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 551.66 284162 5/11/2006 110888 LOPEZ, ELIZABETH 68.97 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 135083 050206 1190.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 68.97 284163 5/1112006 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 510.89 135232 199731 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 835.13 135233 199521 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 1,449.52 135479 199519 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 2,795.54 284164 5/11/2006 101165 MAA.O. 90.00 SUMMER SEMINARS 135392 050506 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 110.00 SUMMER SEMINARS 135539 050806 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 200.00 284165 5/11/2006 100868 MARK VII SALES J6 14:21:59 Page- 15 Business Unit POLICE FORFEITURE INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS PSTF OCCUPANCY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ASSESSING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING ASSESSING ASSESSING 6,260.65 135234 926339 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 80.20 135235 926340 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 9,458.55 135480 928719 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 15,799.40 284166 5/11/2006 103280 MARLIN COMPANY, THE 586.57 COMMUNICATIONS PROGRAM 00001257 135182 359753 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 586.57 5/10/2006 14:21:59 Page - 16 FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL WEED MOWING ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CENTENNIAL LAKES 50TH STREET RUBBISH ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENTENNIAL LAKES . , CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register . 5/11/2006 - 5/1112006 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 284167 5111/2006 119209 MASTER TECHNOLOGY GROUP 1,220.00 INSTALL PAGING SYSTEM 135440 37878 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,220.00 284168 5111/2006 102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC 68.97 REPLACEMENT PHONE CORDS 135084 30795 1550.6188 TELEPHONE 68.97 284169 5/11/2006 111825 MCGUIRE MECHANICAL SERVICES IN 124.62 REPAIR LEAKING TOILET 135529 2843 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 124.62 284170 5111/2006 111273 MEDICA 74.86 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 135522 LYNNE REEKER 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 74.86 284171 5/11/2006 100953 MEDTRONIC EMERGENCY RESPONSE S 321.30 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003644 135441 PC843733 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 600.00 QTRLY MAINTENANCE 00003644 135442 OCS49014 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 921.30 284172 5/1112006 101457 MEICHSNER, EARL 39.61 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 135317 050106 1652.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 39.61 284173 5/11/2006 101483 MENARDS 82.22 TAPE, SCRAPERS, STAPLES 00008015 135085 19302 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 82.22 284174 5/11/2006 101987 MENARDS 17.99 RESPIRATOR 00002365 135502 83680 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 17.99 284175 5/11/2006 103060 MERCURY WASTE SOLUTIONS 246.67 LAMP RECYCLING 135318 213414 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 246.67 284176 5/11/2006 100882 MERIT SUPPLY 1,858.43 REPAIR SCRUBBER 00008014 135086 E' .- 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 288.19 BROOMS, SQUEEGEES 00005604 135087 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,915.98 BATTERIES FOR SCRUBBER 00002367 135503 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS 4,062.60 5/10/2006 14:21:59 Page - 16 FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL WEED MOWING ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CENTENNIAL LAKES 50TH STREET RUBBISH ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENTENNIAL LAKES . , & 6 14:21:59 Page - 17 Business Unit FIELD MAINTENANCE INSPECTIONS CITY HALL GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL 41860 135236 81082103 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 418.60 CITY . NA R55CKREG -OG20000 5/11/2006 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 720.00 Council Check Register 32820 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5/11/2006 - 5/11/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 284177 5/1112006 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 16,181.41 WATER PURCHASE 135443 050306 5913.6601 WATER PURCHASED 583.89 FIELD PAINT, BASE PLUGS 00005878 135183 90300 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER 583.89 5/1112006 102770 MINNESOTA CASTERS INC. 284178 511112006 100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 61.78 RIG, WHEEL 00005896 135184 INV26988 1642.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,534.50 APRIL 2006 135533 050506 1495.4307 SAC CHARGES 1642.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,534.50 56.44 284179 5/1112006 284184 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY 101376 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT 733.00 SUPPLIES 00004091 135357 24039 1551.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS 797.41 SUPPLIES 00004091 135357 24039 1551.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 1,530.41 511112006 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER 284180 5/11/2006 100692 MIDWEST COCA -COLA EAGAN 6.23 GASKET 00001122 135185 0068024 -IN & 6 14:21:59 Page - 17 Business Unit FIELD MAINTENANCE INSPECTIONS CITY HALL GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL 41860 135236 81082103 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION FIELD MAINTENANCE FIELD MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION FIELD MAINTENANCE 300.00 CLASS FEE 135358 06 -074 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 300.00 418.60 284181 5/11/2006 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 720.00 CURB BOX REPAIR 00001055 135088 32820 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 720.00 284182 5/11/2006 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 16,181.41 WATER PURCHASE 135443 050306 5913.6601 WATER PURCHASED 16,181.41 284183 5/1112006 102770 MINNESOTA CASTERS INC. 61.78 RIG, WHEEL 00005896 135184 INV26988 1642.6530 REPAIR PARTS 5.34- CREDIT ON ACCOUNT 135359 E000235 1642.6530 REPAIR PARTS 56.44 284184 511112006 101376 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT 597.18 WATER SERVICE BRASS 00001056 135089 0185099 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS 597.18 284185 511112006 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER 6.23 GASKET 00001122 135185 0068024 -IN 1642.6530 REPAIR PARTS 6.23 284186 511112006 102082 MPLS COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COL DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION FIELD MAINTENANCE FIELD MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION FIELD MAINTENANCE 300.00 CLASS FEE 135358 06 -074 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 300.00 CITY OF EDINA 5/10/2006 14:21:59 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 18 5/11/2006 -- 5/11/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 284187 5111/2006 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 356.59 PIPE 00006471 135090 517632 -00 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,875.34 FERTILIZER/FUNGICIDE 00002382 135504 513128 -00 5630.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES 2,231.93 284188 5/11/2006 104672 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 138.70 135150 737969523 -023 1495.6188 TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS 555.12 135151 909583317 -053 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 16.24 135319 679000121 -042 1120.6188 TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION 54,89 135319 679000121 -042 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 764.95 284189 5/1112006 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPP 414.73 STEEL 00005192 135091 108911 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 414.73 284190 5/11/2006 119357 NORTHERN DEWATERING INC. 404.70 ANTI- VANDAL DOOR KIT 00001058 135186 18991 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 404.70 284191 5/11/2006 102138 NORTHERN WINDS CONCERT BAND 75.00 PERFORMANCE 5/14/06 135320 050106 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 75.00 284192 5/11/2006 100930 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO. 166.90 SCRAP TIRE DISPOSAL 00005949 135092 NW- 101234 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 166.90 284193 5/11/2006 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 21.11 DISC CLEANER 00006264 135393 334808850 -001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 14.25 PAPER, CLIPS 00006264 135394 335149487- 001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 35.36 284194 5/11/2006 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 106.92 SHACKLES 00005894 135187 390030 1642.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIELD MAINTENANCE 7.30 KOMELON TAPE 00001241 135444 390619 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 114.22 284195 5111/2006 118891 OLSON, LYNN 57.98 UNIFORM PURCHASE 135360 050406 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 57.98 CITY INA 1614:21:59 R55CKREG _JG20000 Council Check Register Page - 19 5/11/2006 -- 5/11/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 284196 5/11/2006 101659 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 934.96 1 -YR SERVICE CONTRACT 135445 ACCT6881115 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 532.92 1 -YR SERVICE CONTRACT 135446 ACCT6881124 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,467.88 284197 5/11/2006 119757 OWATONNA MOTOR CO. 15,821.00 2006 DODGE GRAND CARAVAN 00003088 135447 68745 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 15,821.00 284198 5/11/2006 104916 PAINTERS GEAR INC. 429.18 GRACO GM 5000 REPAIRS 00001019 135095 65320 1335.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PAVEMENT MARKINGS 429.18 284199 5/11/2006 101718 PARTS PLUS 1,597.61 AUTO PARTS 135094 043006 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,597.61 264200 5/11/2006 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 1,739.43 135237 8107458 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 845,29 135481 8107457 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,584.72 284201 511112006 110832 PC2 SOLUTIONS, INC. 920.00 TECHNOLOGY CONSULTING 135321 40806009 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 640.00 TECHNOLOGY CONSULTING 135322 42206003 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,560.00 284202 5/1112006 102963 PELUF, JIM 109.96 UNIFORM PURCHASE 121836 100305 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 109.96 284203 5/11/2006 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 686.70 135395 27983201 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 458.10 135505 32914128 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES 1,144.80 284204 5/11/2006 103512 PETTY CASH 28.80- CHECKING ACCT 135361 050406 1400.8060 CASH OVER AND UNDER POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 48.80 CHECKING ACCT 135361 050406 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION _ 58.00 CHECKING ACCT 135361 050406 1400.6106 MEETING EXPENSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 90.00 CHECKING ACCT 135361 050406 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5/10/2006 14:21:59 Page - 20 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 956.54 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR R55CKREG LOG20000 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 284205 5/1112006 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING Council Check Register 4,813.09 135482 5/11/2006 - 5/11/2006 5842:5513 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 99.00 CHECKING ACCT 135361 050406 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 116.83 CHECKING ACCT 135361 050406 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 132.71 CHECKING ACCT 135361 050406 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 44000 CHECKING ACCT 135361 050406 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 5/10/2006 14:21:59 Page - 20 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 956.54 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 284205 5/1112006 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4,813.09 135482 2323894 5842:5513 797.99 135483 2323893 5842.5513 480.98 135484 2323891 5842.5512 104.98 135485 2323892 5842.5515 141.84- 135486 3337413 5842.5513 97.03- 135487 3337412 5822.5513 5,958.17 284206 5111/2006 100119 PING 241.79 GOLF CLUBS 00006298 135396 8019205 5440.5511 241.79 284207 5/1112006 111779 PIONEER RESEARCH CORPORATION 521.58 TAR STRIPPER 00005517 135188 184823 1301.6406 521.58 284208 5111/2006 101223 PLANET FORD 54.81- CREDIT 00005805 135323 CM 121929 1553.6530 389.29 ' ROTORS, BRAKES 00005805 135324 121929WFOW 1553.6530 334.48 284209 5/1112006 111340 POLAR CHEVROLET 17,445.49 2006 COLORADO PICKUP 00001947 135189 68281218 1650.6710 20,308.35 2006 CHEVROLET PICKUP 00005145 135534 6E253301 5900.1735 14,433.89 2006 CHEVROLET PICKUP 135535 68296143 5900.1735 52,187.73 284210 511112006 101110 POLLY NORMAN PHOTOGRAPHY 50.00 ABOUT TOWN PHOTOS 135093 042706 2210.6123 50.00 284211 5111/2006 102350 POLO RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION 1,231.08 MERCHANDISE 00006092 135397 41971' ' 5440.5511 1,231.08 5/10/2006 14:21:59 Page - 20 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT AUTOMOBILES & TRUCKS UTILITY BALANCE SHEET AUTOMOBILES & TRUCKS UTILITY BALANCE SHEET MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CITY 0. A 5/1 14:21:59 R55CKREG _ _ X20000 Council Check Register Page - 21 5/11/2006 - 5/11/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 284212 5/11/2006 100961 POSTMASTER 375.00 NEWSLETTER POSTAGE 135536 050806 1628.6235 POSTAGE SENIOR CITIZENS 375.00 284213 5111/2006 102642 PRESTIGE FLAG 61.70 GOLF FLAGS 00006456 135096 146880 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 61.70 284214 5/11/2006 119751 PRIME CUT TREE.SERVICE INC. 2,556.00 ASSESSED TREE REMOVAL 00001094 135190 LE2972 -2 4088.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREE REMOVAL 2,556.00 284215 5/11/2006 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 1,547.21 135238 403997 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 474.00 135239 404399 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,493.60 135240 402673 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 985.45 135488 403994 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5,500.26 284216 5/11/2006 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 810.17 LINERS, TOWELS, TISSUE 00002384 135506 3760 5630.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 810.17 284217 5/11/2006 100547 PULSTAR DISTRIBUTING 16.46 ANTENNA ADAPTERS 00003128 135448 0024486 -IN 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 154.41 ANTENNA ADAPTERS 00003128 135449 0025157 -IN 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 87.13 ANTENNA ADAPTERS 00003128 135450 0025404 -IN 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 258.00 284218 5/1112006 100971 QUALITY WINE 68.62- 135241 701313-00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 3,461.39 135241 701313 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4.18- 135242 701011 -00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 426.05 135242 701011 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 10.75- 135243 700714 -00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 1,092.64 135243 700714 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3.42- 135244 700992 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 347.75 135244 700992 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING .64- 135245 701220 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 65.15 135245 701220 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 12.24- 135246 701319 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 618.04 135246 701319 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING CITY OF EDINA 5/10/2006 14:21:59 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 22 5/11/2006 -- 5/11/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 107.73- 135247 696917 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 11.14- 135489 700715 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 1,127,80 135489 700715-00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 6.42- 135490 700991 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 654.65 135490 700991 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1.64- 135491 701219 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 169.00 135491 701219-00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 7,735.69 284219 5111/2006 101965 QWEST 96.45 952 927 -8861 135325 8861 -4106 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 54.82 952 929 -0297 135326 0297 -4/06 4090.6188 TELEPHONE STREET REVOLVING 86.74 952 929 -9549 135327 95494/06 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 238.01 284220 5/11/2006 119753 RADLE, MARINA 60.00 SWIM TRANSLATOR 135362 050106 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 60.00 284221 5/11/2006 113422 RAKE PUBLISHING INC. 200.00 ADVERTISING 135097 8456 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 200.00 ADVERTISING 135097 8456 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 200.00 ADVERTISING 135097 8456 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 600.00 284222 5111/2006 100149 RED ROOSTER AUTO STORES 211.39 TRAILER BRAKES 135098 D603415 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 211.39 284223 5/1112006 101111 REED BUSINESS INFORMATION 150.52 AD FOR BID 135099 3233169 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 59.36 AD FOR BID 135100 3233168 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 209.88 284224 5/11/2006 119759 REEKER, LYNNE 995.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 135520 050806 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 995.00 284225 511112006 118155 RENEWAL BY ANDERSON 23,295.00 NEW WINDOWS 135328 077110942 2127.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMM DEV BLK GRANT 23,295.00 5/1, 14:21:59 Page - 23 Business Unit PSTF OCCUPANCY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR STREET RENOVATION BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE GRILL VANVALKENBURG Chemical Rm. Expansion -plant 4 DISTRIBUTION Chemical Rm. Expansion -plant 4 PARKING RAMP SENIOR CITIZENS CITY O. A R55CKREG X20000 Council Check Register 5/11/2006 - 5/11/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 284226 511112006 114489 RICOH CORPORATION 64.50 COPIER MAINTENANCE 135398 G042500257 -21 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 64.50 284227 5/11/2006 102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 110.70 PINTLE HOOKS 00005611 135101 1151265 -01 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 16.55 JACKS 00005612 135102 1152215 -01 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 127.25 284228 5111/2006 118001 ROZEBOOM MILLER ARCHITECTS INC 18,743.40 ARCHITECT /ENG SERVICES 135348 13 4401.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 18,743.40 284229 5/11/2006 100985 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQ CO INC 75.90 MANHOLE GASKETS 00001263 135191 C42248 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 75.90 284230 5/1112006 103269 S.H. BARTLETT CO INC 128.23 SOLENOIDS 00005888 135192 19367 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS 553.80 FAUCETS 00001078 135193 19432 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS 682.03 284231 5111/2006 101634 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPANY 76.37 BAKERY 00006349 135399 152345 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 76.37 284232 5/1112006 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 118.90 101 - 26373069350 135103 VAN VALKENBURG 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 118.90 284233 5111/2006 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 61.01 FELT, NAILS, STAPLES 00001135 135194 40289013 05453.1705.31 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES 59.15 LUMBER 00001164 135195 40290515 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 43.88 FELT, LUMBER 00001166 135196 40291506 05453.1705.31 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES 164.04 284234 5111/2006 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. 545.61 QUARTERLY BILLING 00001249 135104 8101536124 1375.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 552.48 QUARTERLY BILLING 135105 8101535111 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,098.09 284235 5111/2006 102949 SECURITAS SECURITY SYSTEMS USA 5/1, 14:21:59 Page - 23 Business Unit PSTF OCCUPANCY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR STREET RENOVATION BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE GRILL VANVALKENBURG Chemical Rm. Expansion -plant 4 DISTRIBUTION Chemical Rm. Expansion -plant 4 PARKING RAMP SENIOR CITIZENS CITY OF EDINA 5/10/2006 14:21:59 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 24 5/11/2006 -- 5111/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 407.90 ALARM SERVICE CONTRACT 135507 2087197 -IN 5630.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES . 575.10 ALARM MONITORING 135508 D3150242 5630.6250 ALARM SERVICE CENTENNIAL LAKES 983.00 284236 511112006 103970 SEEGER, MICHAEL 204.01 K9 TRAINING EXPENSES 135363 050406 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 204.01 284237 5/11/2006 103249 SHANNON, JIM 115.00 PERFORMANCE 5/18/06 135329 050106 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 115.00 284238 5111/2006 119758 SHUTES, SHELLEY 175.23 SPRINKLER REPAIR 135537 050806 01204.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BROOKVIEW - 52 TO 54 RECLAIM 175.23 284239 5111/2006 117179 SIGNAL PRO EQUIPMENT 3,669.56 SOD CUTTER 00005733 135197 6195 1650.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 3,669.56 284240 5/1112006 101383 SIITARI, MICHAEL 12.77 AWARD PLAQUES 135152 050106 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT: GENERAL 259.87 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 135152 050106 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 272.64 284241 511112006 119422 SIZER, CORA LEE 61.10 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 135330 050106 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 61.10 284242 5/1112006 119760 SMITH, DANIEL 25.02 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 135521 050806 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 25.02 284243 5111/2006 110977 SOW, ADAMA 96.85 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 135331 050106 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 96.85 ' 284244 5/11/2006 101021 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC 37.69 GASOLINE 135198 042506 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 93.69 PROPANE 135198 . 042506 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 131.38 CITY INA R55CKREG _jG20000 Council Check Register 5/11/2006 — 5/11/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 284245 5/1112006 116856 SPRINT 1 12292 COMA 135153 4/15/06 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING REPAIR PARTS CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES ADVERTISING PERSONNEL REPAIR PARTS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 5 6 14:21:59 Page - 25 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL DISTRIBUTION ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,122.92 284246 5/11/2006 101004 SPS COMPANIES 484.77 COPPER TUBING 00001147 135106 S1434586.001 5913.6530 51.70 REPAIR PARTS 00008017 135509 S1437592.001 5511.6180 536.47 284247 5/11/2006 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC 30.49 HANDLE JACK 00005804 135332 S146318 1553.6406 30.49 284248 5/11/2006 100650 STANLEY SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC 33.96 KEYS 135107 MN- 405836 1646.6406 33.96 284249 5/11/2006 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 6,169.75 WANT ADS 135510 043006 1550.6121 6,169.75 284250 5/11/2006 102069 STEPP MANUFACTURING CO. INC. 98.59 TACK WAND, ELECTRIC EYE 00001255 135108 32553 1553.6530 98.59 284251 5/11/2006 119756 STREICH - DEMARS INC. 100.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATON 135451 050406 1470.6104 100.00 284252 5/11/2006 101015 STREICHERS 4,820.95 SQUAD BUILD -UP 135452 1349605 1400.6710 82.01 MAG HOLDERS 00003104 135453 1348269 1400.6710 76.68- RETURN 00003104 135454 CM211737 1400.6710 102.24- RETURN 00003104 135455 CM211736 1400.6710 4,724.04 254253 5/1112006 117992 STRINGER BUSINESS SYSTEMS 30.58 COPIER USAGE 135364 1169856 1400.6230 30.58 _ 284254 5/11/2006 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 12.25 FLASHER 00005806 135109 437785 -1CVW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES ADVERTISING PERSONNEL REPAIR PARTS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 5 6 14:21:59 Page - 25 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL DISTRIBUTION ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/10/2006 14:21:59 Council Check Register Page - 26 5/11/2006 - 5/11/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 57.29 LOCK ASSEMBLY 00001272 135333 430693 -1CVW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 69.54 284255 5/1112006 102140 SUN MOUNTAIN SPORTS INC. 596.00 MERCHANDISE 00006099 135400 647056 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES , 78.75 MERCHANDISE 00006099 135401 650901 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 102.50 MERCHANDISE 00006099 135402 648157 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 289.50 MERCHANDISE 00006099 135403 646307 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 683.70 MERCHANDISE 00006099 135404 645443 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,518.40 MERCHANDISE 00006099 135405 644751 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 166.70 MERCHANDISE 00006099 135406 646261 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 3,435.55 284256 511112006 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 148.79 PUBLISH WM451 135110 845609 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 35.75 AD FOR BID 135111 845939 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 274.15 WANT AD 135334 845979 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 458.69 284257 511112006 102063 SWENSON, THOMAS 66.67 PRINTER CARTRIDGES, BATTERIES 135335 050206 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 66.67 284258 511112006 108509 TAFFEE, MARY 138.45 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 135336 050106 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 138.45 284259 5/11/2006 104932 TAYLOR MADE 2,052.03 MERCHANDISE 00006157 135407 08401461 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 609.67 MERCHANDISE 00006157 135408 08440096 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 175.85 MERCHANDISE 00006157 135409 08462181 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 175.52 MERCHANDISE 00006157 135410 08464710 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 257.85 MERCHANDISE 00006157 135411 08466964 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 3.270.92 284260 5/11/2006 112358 TEE'S PLUS 410.11 DA.R.E. ITEMS 135366 211741 1425.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DARE 410.11 284261 5/11/2006 101034 THOMSEN & NYBECK 79.40 PROSECUTING 135199 21770 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES 79.40 5/ 14:21:59 Page - 27 Business Unit GRILL GRILL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 236.23 SPEED CART 00006178 135413 0260765 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CITY C JA 00006178 135414 R55CKREG —G20000 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 397.35 Council Check Register 284265 511112006 5/11/2006 — 5/11/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 284262 5/11/2006 5311.6532 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY POOL OPERATION 8,059.00 198,00 135412 22232 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 284266 5/11/2006 4.20- 135492 287865C 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 193.80 23.60 MERCHANDISE 00006014 135415 284263 5/1112006 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 118807 TIME WARNER CABLE 23.60 53.17 CABLE TV SERVICE 00008022 135511 042706 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5/11/2006 53.17 284264 5/11/2006 9,675.00 101474 TITLEIST 00005730 135200 18983 1647.6103 5/ 14:21:59 Page - 27 Business Unit GRILL GRILL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 236.23 SPEED CART 00006178 135413 0260765 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 161.12 GOLF BALLS 00006178 135414 0258400 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 397.35 284265 511112006 101037 TOIVONEN PAINTING 8,059.00 MUNICIPAL POOL PAINTING 00007068 135365 050406 5311.6532 PAINT POOL OPERATION 8,059.00 284266 5/11/2006 118003 TOMMY BAHAMA 23.60 MERCHANDISE 00006014 135415 8330667 5440.551 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 23.60 284267 5/11/2006 101374 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE 9,675.00 FURNISH/INSTALL FENCE 00005730 135200 18983 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 9,675.00 284268 511112006 103153 TREUTING, KRISTEN 57.33 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 135337 050106 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 57.33 284269 511112006 116302 TRI - ANIM HEALTH SERVICES INC 976.29 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003569 135456 MMH61043743 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 976.29 284270 5111/2006 100682 TRUGREEN- CHEMLAWN 60.00 REIMBURSEMENT 135367 050406 1400.4128 SOLICITOR PERMITS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 60.00 284271 5111/2006 102255 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO 59.40 OXYGEN 00003649 135457 835731 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 46.01 OXYGEN 00003649 135458 835735 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/11/2006 - 5/11/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 105.41 284272 5111/2006 101051 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 95 20 UNIFORM 135368 320199 1419.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 1281.6104 5421.6511 5421.6406 5421.5510 5923.6406 5913.6406 5913.6406 5913.6180 5913.6180 5913.6180 95.20 214.45 CONFERENCE LODGING - 135338 19668- 18944 5410.6105 284273 5/11/2006 101055 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 35.00 TRAINING 00001162 135459 D3201547 35.00 135.79 ROLL TOWELS 00003576 135113 631979 284274 5/1112006 101908 US FOODSERVICE INC 697.44 LIQUOR BAGS 00007512 135206 632207 5842.6512 391.87 CUST 114300 00006346 135416 050106 470.04 CUST 114300 00006346 135416 050106 2,358.05 CUST 114300 00006346 135416 050106 4401.6710 3,219.96 8,581.45 284275 5/11/2006 284280 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 82.82 TRACING DYE 00005987 135112 154414 423.36 " CURB BOX & VALVE KIT 00001180 135201 156725 49.47 HYDRANT OIL, ANTI -SEIZE 00001191 135202 157502 555.65 284276 5/1112006 103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 3,330.30 WATER MAIN REPAIR 00001054 135203 10643 3,305.66 WATER MAIN REPAIR 00001053 135204 10644 2,898.98 WATER MAIN REPAIR 00001052 135205 10665 9,534.94 284277 5111/2006 101338 VALLIERE, JOHN - 1281.6104 5421.6511 5421.6406 5421.5510 5923.6406 5913.6406 5913.6406 5913.6180 5913.6180 5913.6180 5/10/2006 14:21:59 Page - 28 Business Unit RESERVE PROGRAM CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING CLEANING SUPPLIES .GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES GRILL GRILL GRILL COLLECTION SYSTEMS DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION GOLF ADMINISTRATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL YORK SELLING EQUIPMENT REPL, .0 ":MENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR 214.45 CONFERENCE LODGING - 135338 19668- 18944 5410.6105 214.45 284278 5/11/2006 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 135.79 ROLL TOWELS 00003576 135113 631979 1470.6406 697.44 LIQUOR BAGS 00007512 135206 632207 5842.6512 833.23 284279 5/11/2006 102734 VEIT & COMPANY INC . 8,581.45 GYM CONSTRUCTION 135349 50725.3 4401.6710 8,581.45 284280 5/ " - "06 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 5/10/2006 14:21:59 Page - 28 Business Unit RESERVE PROGRAM CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING CLEANING SUPPLIES .GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES GRILL GRILL GRILL COLLECTION SYSTEMS DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION GOLF ADMINISTRATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL YORK SELLING EQUIPMENT REPL, .0 ":MENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR CITY NA 5 314:21:59 R55CKREG -jG20000 Council Check Register Page - 29 5/11/2006 - 5/11/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 104.15 SAFETY JACKET & GLASSES 00001167 135207 174338 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 104.15 284281 511112006 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 118.60 LIGHTING 00001149 135339 15043659 -00 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 118.60 284282 5111/2006 103466 WASTE MANAGEMENT - SAVAGE MN 3,223.33 REFUSE 135460 3571208 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 3,223.33 284283 5/1112006 105201 WERRE, BOB 95.00 DRIVER 00006110 135417 1436 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 95.00 284284 5/1112006 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 780.05 135493 140656 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4.00- 135494 140370 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 34,67- 135495 140054 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 741.38 284285 5/11/2006 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 811.11 135496 156371 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 811.11 284286 5111/2006 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 1,114.50 135248 178292 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,114.50 284287 511112006 101726 XCEL ENERGY 115.38 51- 5938955-0 135114 66809762 4086.6185 LIGHT & POWER AQUATIC WEEDS 318.82 51 -4827232 -6 135115 66623111 5311.6185 LIGHT & POWER POOL OPERATION 109.42 51- 5634814 -2 135116 66803403 5933.6185 LIGHT & POWER PONDS & LAKES 201.08 51- 4156445 -0 135117 66769731 5932.6185 LIGHT & POWER GENERAL STORM SEWER 372.57 51- 6046826-0 135118 66812375 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 132.48 51- 6229265 -9 135119 66816691 1481.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK FIRE STATION 793.79 51- 6229265 -9 135119 66816691 1470.6185 LIGHT & POWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 270.90 51-6137136 -8 135120 66655034 5430.6185 LIGHT & POWER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 2,158.94 51- 4159265 -8 135154 67094339 7411.6185 LIGHT & POWER PSTF OCCUPANCY 4,595.73 51- 4966303 -6 135341 67113386 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 53.46 51- 7567037-0 135461 66695935 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 19.82 51 -4151897 -6 135512 67270508 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE F 5/10/2006 14:21:59 Page - 30 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION STREET LIGHTING REGULAR PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER _ TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 50TH ST OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY - YORK OCCUPANCY ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CLUB HOUSE 1550.6406 36,438.36 CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CITY OF EDINA 284288 5/11/2006 1550.6151 R55CKREG LOG20000 CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 79.88 STAPLES 135121 194552523 5110.6151 399.68 Council Check Register 135122 016970001 PSTF OCCUPANCY 125.05 APRIL USAGE - PARK &REC 5/11/2006 - 5/11/2006 GENERAL SUPPLIES 26.00 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1,306.33 51- 6621207 -1 135513 67297859 5913.6185. LIGHT &'POWER 016970203 9.87 51- 7567037-0 135514 67336832 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER 2,485.28 51- 6840050 -6 135515 67309134 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER 900.51 51- 5847121 -5 135516 67290531 5914.6185 LIGHT & POWER 920.01 51- 6979948 -4 135517 67305874 5821.6185 LIGHT & POWER 1,082.63 51- 6979948 -4 135517 67305874 5861.6185 LIGHT & POWER 1,273.56 51- 6979948 135517 67305874 5841.6185 LIGHT & POWER 15,592.35 514888627 -1 135518 67260450 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER 3,725.43 51- 6824328 -7 135538 67785195 5420.6185 LIGHT & POWER F 5/10/2006 14:21:59 Page - 30 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION STREET LIGHTING REGULAR PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER _ TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 50TH ST OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY - YORK OCCUPANCY ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CLUB HOUSE 1550.6406 36,438.36 CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 284288 5/11/2006 1550.6151 100568 XEROX CORPORATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 79.88 STAPLES 135121 194552523 5110.6151 399.68 APRIL USAGE - ADMIN 135122 016970001 PSTF OCCUPANCY 125.05 APRIL USAGE - PARK &REC 135123 016970004 GENERAL SUPPLIES 26.00 APRIL USAGE - BLDG/ENG 135124 016970003 1553.6530 322.17 APRIL USAGE 135155 016970002 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 104.17 APRIL USAGE 135208 016970203 1,056.95 284269 5111/2006 118288 XO COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES INC 528.73 PHONE & DATA 135156 21799723 528.73 284290 5/1112006 105343 YES DISTRIBUTING INC. 272.99 FILTERS 00006265, 135418 167790 272.99 284291 511112006 105727 ZEBEC OF NORTH AMERICA INC. 1,482.30 INNER TUBES 135157 9404 1,482.30 284. 292 5/11/2006 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 246.09 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 135519 54161803 246.09 284293 5/11/2006 101091 ZIEGLER INC 46.60 PLUGS, SEALS 00005191 135125 PC000890711 100.62 PIN, WASHERS, RINGS 00005191 135126 PC000890712 345.00 GENERATOR CONTRACT 135340 E3809726 492.22 F 5/10/2006 14:21:59 Page - 30 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION STREET LIGHTING REGULAR PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER _ TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 50TH ST OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY - YORK OCCUPANCY ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CLUB HOUSE 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5110.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 5610.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT ED ADMINISTRATION 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY C, AA Council Check Register 5/11/2006 — 5/11/2006 Check Al Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 878,865.91 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 878,865.91 Total Payments 878,865.91 5/1, 14:21:59 Page - 31 R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/10/2006 14:23:27 Council Check Summary Page - 1 511112006 - 5/11/2006 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 172,258.30 02100 CDBG FUND 23,295.00 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 8,433.62 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 404,762.24 05100 ART CENTER FUND 557.90 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 9,860.12 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 42,345.26 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 18,124.10 05600 EDINBOROUGH/CENT LAKES FUND 7,258.90 05800 LIQUOR FUND 91,542.63 05900 UTILITY FUND 86,145.30 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 715.20 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 13,567.34 Report Totals 878,865.91 We crifirm to the bew of our b wledW and belief, that these claims comply In ell material respects with the requirements of the City of. Edina purchasing 0,1cles and Procedures date to AGENDA ITEM: VII.A. Gabbert & Beck 3510 GALLERIA, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55435 -4269 (952) 925 -4321 Fax (952) 925 -2965 May 11, 2006 Gordon Hughes City Manager City of Edina 4801 West 50`h Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Gordon: After a careful analysis of the parking situation at the Galleria and the Hotel project, I have decided to forego the proof of parking condition imposed by the City Council at its March 6, 2006 City Council Meeting. In return, I will build the additional level of ramp that could have been imposed by the city at a future time. This will add an additional 181 parking stalls to the original 751 stall ramp. There are several reasons that I have made this decision: 1. Having evaluated a variety of high -end restaurants for the Westin, I have found that they have could have a higher demand on the parking ramp and the Galleria site than initially anticipated. 2. While the Galleria currently has a surface level proof of parking agreement, I have been informed by city staff that no parking ramp in the City has such an agreement. The impact of such an agreement, if imposed, would be far more constraining to the site than simply adding additional surface parking stalls. Under such an agreement, the ramp would have to be closed during the period of construction of the additional level. This would take 751 stalls out of use for a significant period of time (four to six months). This would have a major negative impact on Galleria tenants. 3. There would also be an impact to adjacent properties and traffic levels around the Galleria site if the additional level were built at a later time. This could be an imposition to the neighboring properties and level of traffic at the surrounding intersections during high demand times. This type of chaotic situation would not be good for the Galleria, the Westin, the condominium residents or the people traveling in the immediate area. 4. Lastly, I believe that building the level now instead of later will result in a better structure. If added later, the new level would be, in essence, "snapped on" the top of the ramp. Adding the level now there will provide a much better aesthetic look by redesigning the columns to be an integral construction with no seams at the upper level. In addition, our climate has a way of impacting the color hues of construction materials. By adding the level now, the ramp will achieve a uniform precast color that will age consistently into the future. Please bear in mind that the parking ramp design shown in our presentation to the city illustrated the height of the ramp with the additional level. Because we agreed during the City Council review to depress the first level of the ramp below grade, the exhibit presented showed how the ramp would appear with the additional level in place. While this will extend the parking ramp construction cycle, we hope to work closely with the building department staff to stay as close as we can to the original completion date. I will be submitting some revised plans within the next few days so that building department plan review can continue. Thank you for your time and your staff's time in helping evaluate the impacts and schedule issues related to this change. I look forward to getting construction underway in the next 3 to 4 weeks. Sincerely, fdtA,-- Warren Beck Chief Michael Siitari Edina Police Department 4801 West 5e Street Edina, MN 55424 May 1, 2006 On behalf of my brother, Ronald Schmitz, I would like to thank the Edina Police Department for all the help that was done mi helping win a conviction against Lori Edberg, who stole a large sum of money from my brother. I would like to point out the dedication and hard work that Detective Vik Konters did in completing this case. He was a pleasure to work with day in and day out. I appreciated the fact that he was professional, well informed, gave high quality advice, always returned phone calls, and.kept me up to date during the entire investigation. The residents of the City of Edina are very; lucky to have such fine, quality personnel` serving in their community. Sincerely, a Roger Schmitz Power of Attorney for. Ronald Schmitz. cc: Detective Vik Konters MEMORANDUM DATE: May 16, 2006 TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Sherry Engelman, City Sanitarian SUBJECT: Edina All Hazards Emergency Preparedness and Pandemic Flu Planning The intent of this memorandum is to provide a general overview of recent efforts to improve all hazards and public health preparedness in Edina. While the City of Edina Emergency Plan is based on All Hazards Response, the threat of pandemic flu provides need for supplemental planning. Two key components are planning for continuity of operations and providing community education. In March, Council Members were encouraged to attend a videoconference on "Pandemic Flu for Elected Officials ". On May 3, 2006, agencies statewide gathered to hear Minnesota Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management present a pandemic flu supplement to the Minnesota Emergency Operations Plan (MEOP) and to hear Minnesota Department of Health introduce their draft plan for pandemic influenza. These documents provide the framework for local agencies - to-develop- supplements to-their emergency plans. As a follow -up to the May 3 presentation, Edina staff met this week with the Bloomington Public Health Nursing and the Emergency Preparedness Coordinator to. begin a planning process to determine how the pandemic supplements work into our Edina Emergency Operations Plan. This planning process will extend over the next several months and will involve essential City staff. We expect,to coordinate with community organizations. Staff is already scheduled to meet with the school district the end of May to review the districts preparedness plan. In addition, arrangements have been made for a presentation to neighborhood block captains May 24 in the Council Chambers. The presentation, which will focus on preparing families and neighborhoods for emergencies, will be video taped for future training sessions. The Edina Community Health Committee recently hosted a forum on Pandemic Flu presented by Dianne Mandernach, Minnesota Commissioner of Health. The presentation was replayed on Channel 16 to reach a larger audience. The Committee will be discussing pandemic flu business planning at their May meeting. In addition to numerous emergency preparedness training and exercise sessions, several police, fire and health department staff have completed National Incident Management Systems training, which is mandatory for emergency response individuals. In preparation for emergency response, departments have been acquiring personal protective equipment. Further details will follow as our planning progresses. Sharon Allison prom: Wayne Houle ,ent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 9:12 PM ro: Sharon Allison Subject: FW: neighborhood streets Can you attached this to the next Council Packet. Thanks - - - -- Original Message---- - From: James Fricton [mailto:frict001 @umn.edu] Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 9:29 AM To: Chris Smith; Steve Lillehaug Cc: Wayne Houle Subject: neighborhood streets Hi Chris and Steve; I just wanted to send you a note to tell you that the streets in our neighborhood look great this spring. You, your staff and subs did a great job. The lights look great, the drainage works, and the streets and curbs function very well. The neighborhood greatly appreciate your efforts to get this done last year without much hassle. We cannot wait for our neighborhood picnic. There are still some minor landscaping and irrigation work to be done at a few houses. Can you tell me who I should contact to get this done? or should we do it and send the bill to you? Best Regards, Jim Fricton Sunnyslope Secretary 1 April 21, 2006 Dear Mayor James Hovland, Recently I had to go to Fairview University Medical Center on the West Bank. As I turned East from 35W. I noticed ugly apartment buildings. I am sure they were not considered ugly when first built but the high -rise units in that area called attention to their appearance. Your recently televised council meeting brought those high -rise units into sharp focus. I hope we don't have to have high - rise units in our neighborhood regardless of appearance. What is Edina? Of course it is a geographical location but it is much more. When I supervised busses with student fans to Lake Conference games, I knew that as soon as the bus reentered the city limits the students would start to sing over and over: "We're from Edina; Mighty fine Edina, "Everywhere we go, People want to know "Who we are, So we tell them." You may ask, "Where are these students now ?" I cannot speak for other neighborhoods but within 300 feet of my Edina home there are six homes purchased by Edina graduates. Even one of my sons returned to begin a company now employing 15 people in Edina. When the Swedish vice - counsel moved next door several years ago, I asked why move to this neighborhood when he had choices in the metropolitan area. He informed me that the Swedish foreign service rates areas where there are consulates. He said the Cornelia neighborhood was the only recommended he would consider. He had rented until a home came on the market. Certainly neighborhoods help give Edina stability and importance. Not too long ago the city council turned down an office building on France Avenue where the Lutheran Church of the Master once stood. This was in recognition of the Cornelia neighborhood to the west and the petition signed by so many. What is Edina? I wish we could quantify what Edina is. When I came here in 1956, I knew this is where I wanted to teach and to live because of the outstanding nature of each neighborhood. My wife and I are planning to move to the Centennial Lakes neighborhood. Don't disappoint us. A recent evening news broadcast ended with the statement that "Money Trumps Taste." Please consider the views expressed by the neighbors to the height of a high -rise in our parks. Thank you for your hard work, countless hours, and consideration for all. David Christenson 7312 West Shore Drive EDINA PARK BOARD TUESDAY, APRIL 11, 2006 7:00 P.M. EDINA COMMUNITY ROOM EDINA CITY HALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Andy Finsness, Gordon Roland, Todd Fronek, Mike Damman, Karla Sitek, Ray O'Connell MEMBERS ABSENT: Jeff Johnson, Linda Presthus, Jeff Sorem George Klus, Mike Weiss STAFF PRESENT: John Keprios, Ed MacHolda, Janet Canton OTHERS PRESENT: Germane Paterlini I. APPROVAL OF THE FEBRUARY 14.2006 PARK BOARD MINUTES Todd Fronek MOVED TO APPROVE THE FEBRUARY 14, 2006 PARK BOARD MINUTES. Mike Damman SECONDED THE MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED. II. NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEY — REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Mr. Finsness asked for the Park Board's input on the proposed assessment survey. Mr. Damman commented that it covers everything and looks good. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that Mr. MacHolda is to be credited for putting the proposal together. He noted that if the proposal is approved he will mail it out to the five firms listed in his staff report. Mr. Finsness asked Mr. Keprios if he thinks the consulting firms will stick to what is suggested to them or will they expand on it. Mr. Keprios replied that depending on the type of process they end up using they will likely expand upon it. Mr. Finsness clarified that once a consulting firm is picked the Park Board will have the opportunity to go through and develop it with them. Mr. Keprios stated that a big part of this is going to be deciding on what type of survey they are going to conduct. He noted that they also need to discuss how they are going to go about engaging the community to be a part of this process. Mr. Fronek commented that the proposal is well written but that he would like to see an amendment made regarding buckthorn abatement and urban forest management. He noted that he agrees that buckthorn is a bad thing, however, the general topic should be addressed as "environmental management" because then it can include things like water quality, etc. He noted that he doesn't want to end up having a huge buckthorn proposal come back that doesn't address some of the other environmental needs. Mr. O'Connell stated that the whole buckthorn thing is so multi- faceted and so much broader than anything the Park Board can do. He noted that in order to satisfy the requirements of any buckthorn abatement program they are going to need a broad volunteer group that will just be dedicated to taking care of buckthorn. He commented even with that they will still be fighting a tough battle because it just keeps spreading, especially on the private properties. Mr. O'Connell pointed out they should not tailor a question just to facilities per se, but rather take a harder look at what is needed in our parks to facilitate the uses so they can satisfy the requirements of all of the - generations and interests across the,board. He noted that he is posing a very broad question but he thinks they have an obligation to try to develop in the broadest possible way without being specific but yet try to get to specifics. It will be a very tough thing to do. Mr. Finsness asked Mr. O'Connell if he had any suggestions to which he replied he does not. Mr. O'Connell stated that it has been pointed out that Edina is a very landlocked city with very limited land that's available, but could we go outside the parameters of the city limits because then we could ask all kinds of other questions relating to that. Mr. Finsness indicated that he thinks it's going to get much more complicated as they go down the road because he's sure they will get into some of those types of discussions. Mr. Finsness recommended that they eliminate C and add the word "added" to D so it would read "What facilities should be added, replaced or eliminated ?" Mr. Keprios explained that he envisions the process to start with general topics and through the process learn not only are they going to try to identify what some of the needs and desires are, but also test the waters on ideas that come out of the process. Mr. Keprios stated that if the Park Board is serious about considering some of the ideas that have been discussed then we need to measure the level of community support for each idea. Without community support, it should be obvious that those things should not be pursued. Mr. O'Connell asked how broad are they going to have the survey to which Mr. Keprios replied that they can make it as broad and/or as specific as they want. Mr. Keprios noted that he envisions it to have some very specific proposals. Mr. O'Connell asked if they were to give the consulting firm some specific points will they be able to tailor it for us to which Mr. Keprios responded yes. The consulting firm's job is to word it properly.and to try to get the question that identifies what it is we want to know. For example, how would the community feel if a specific development were proposed for a specific park? He stated that they are going to need to ask some very tough questions. Todd Fronek MOVED THAT SECTION 2A, QUESTION ONE, REMOVE THE WORDS BUCKTHORN ABATEMENT AND URBAN FORESTS AND INSERT THE N WORD ENVIRONMENTAL SO IT WOULD READ WOULD RESIDENTS SUPPORT A MORE COSTLY AND MORE AGREESSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. Karla Sitek SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. III. UPDATES A. Edina Youth Sports Taskforce — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that the Edina Youth Sports Task Force has created two documents. The first document is a resolution of core values to which they will be asking the Park Board to recommend to the City Council for their adoption as a resolution. He explained that it identifies the kind of culture and expectations there are going to be. Mr. Keprios stated the Taskforce has also created what they call a Relationship Document which is a potpourri of all of the issues they felt were important that need to be addressed to identify the roles, relationships and responsibilities of the city, staff, Park Board and City Council as it relates to Edina's youth athletic associations. In addition, it will also better identify what they feel are hot zones whether it be grievances, etc. At this time they are not addressing or recommending an oversight committee. However, there is a level of grievance that staff is recommending to the Taskforce Committee. The Taskforce hopes to have its final recommendations presented to the Park Board at either the May or June Park Board meeting. Mr. Keprios indicated that the Taskforce is going to meet again to finish the two documents that will then be presented to the community and athletic associations to which they will have 30 days to respond. If there are no changes the Taskforce will meet again on May 11th. Mr. Finsness asked how they are going to get that information out to the community to which Mr. Keprios replied it will be put on their website as well as they will announce it in the paper. B. Courtney Fields Shelter Building — Mr. Keprios explained to the Park Board that the City Council was a little shocked at the price tag he was proposing for the new Courtney Fields Shelter building. Therefore, he hired Anderson Johnson & Associations who teamed up with ATS & R Architects to do a feasibility study of the shelter building. He stated that the study did indicate that there are a couple of walls that can be reused which would save over $100,000 rather than tearing it down and starting over. However, the cost is still approximately $450,000 to $500,000 when everything is all said and done. Mr. Keprios pointed out that they are now going to start drawing documents and finalize the plan. He added that the City Council has asked them to come up with some deduct alternates to try and takeout some of those things they can live without in order to keep the price tag down. He noted that July 24th is when they hope to get things started. 3 C. Off -Leash Dog Area - Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that the City Council did approve the language to change the ordinance which essentially gives the Park Director the authority to use any portion of any park as an off -leash dog area. He stated that they are moving forward with the Van Valkenburg concept to which he just signed the purchase order to have the fencing installed. The off -leash dog area at Van Valkenburg Park should be operational by the middle of May. Mr. Keprios commented that instead of tags they are going to be selling colored collars so that it will be easier for the animal control officer to identify. Mr. Keprios indicated that the City Council has asked that at next month's Park Board meeting they discuss the concept of using some of the hockey rinks as off - leash dog areas. He noted that Eden Prairie currently has four hockey rinks which they are now using as off =leash dog parks and so far it has been very successful. IV. ORIENTATION — POWER POINT PRESENTATION Mr. Keprios showed the Park Board a 110 slide Power Point Presentation he put together as an overview of the Park and Recreation Department, including facilities, staff, budget, programs, services, and areas of responsibility. The presentation also served as an orientation for new Park Board members, including a list of issues, challenges, procedures, and a Code of Ethics as suggested by the National Recreation and Park Association. The Park Board thanked Mr. Keprios for the wonderful presentation he put together. V. OTHER A. Minneapolis Off -Leash Dog Park - Mr. Keprios handed out a letter to the Park Board that he received from the new City Coordinator from the City of Minneapolis. The letter was in response to a letter co- signed by our City Manager, Gordon Hughes, and the City Manager of St. Louis Park, regarding the property at 40`h and France Avenue for a possible off -leash dog park. The Minneapolis City Coordinator informed us that the City of Minneapolis currently cannot enter into a lease for a dog park on the City of Minneapolis property at 40th and France. At this time the City of Minneapolis engineers are conducting a strategic analysis to find out what the long -term plans are going to be for the piece of property. Once the analysis is completed they will let the City of Edina know of the results. B. Forestry Report — Mr. Keprios handed out a copy of the Forestry Report to the Park Board members. He indicated that it's obvious to him that they need to do a better job of planting trees. This past year they lost 402 trees and only planted 14. Unfortunately, too much of their resources are consumed by chasing trees with Dutch Elm Disease because there is so much of it out there. He noted all of the maintenance staff could work eight hours a day on this and they still would not be able to get on top of it. Mr. Keprios explained that they address it where it's critical to avoid the 4 spread to other neighboring shade trees but they clearly have to do a better job of planting new trees. Mr. O'Connell asked about the Oak Wilt problem to which Mr. Keprios replied that for several years he has hired a company called Kunde, and they do a wonderful job of helping to identify Oak Wilt. He noted that they haven't lost anywhere near the number of Oaks in comparison to the Elms. However, there is now another new disease coming their way that is going to affect our ash trees. C. Goose Management Program - Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that Dr. Cooper, the person they hired to do their goose management program, has sent him a letter putting him on alert that they are going to have to start meeting to come up with a homeland security type program to deal with the Avian Bird Flu if the disease becomes transferable from geese to humans. He noted that they are going to have to come up with a very quick and aggressive plan so that they are prepared to deal with this should it ever happen. D. Cypress Development Project — Mr. Damman asked Mr. Keprios if the Park Board is going to be involved with Cypress Development Project at Centennial Lakes. Mr. Keprios replied that for right now there is not a need for the Park Board to be involved in that process. However, if it starts to significantly affect the park the Park Board may become involved, however, he has been told that, with the exception of replacing some trees and shrubs, it is not significantly affecting the park at this time. E. Bike Paths - Mr. Fronek asked what the status is with the bike paths. Mr. Keprios replied that City Engineer, Wayne Houle, has secured a million dollar grant for the Interlachen Trail if the City decides to move forward with the project. At this point, it is primarily an engineering project. However, for the past four years the Park Board has been part of the First Tier Regional Trail project. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that he will be meeting with Richfield and Bloomington and some of the engineers to discuss what are the right connections for the Cities when these trails come on -line and how are they going to make that happen. Mr. Keprios stated that he will keep the Park Board updated as they move along. Mr. Finsness asked that bike paths be put as an agenda item for next month's meeting. VI. ADJOURNMENT Ray O'Connell MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 8:00 PM. Todd Fronek SECONDED THE MOTION. MEETING ADJOURNED. 5 V ,w 1 Chief Marty Sheerer Edina Fire Department 6250 Tracy Avenue Edina, MN. 55436 April 29, 2006 Dear Chief Sheerer, 0 This morning one of your paramedic teams transported me from the Vernon Avenue !SuperAmerica to Fairview Southdale Hospital. What I seriously thought was a possible heart attack or stroke, quite thankfully turned out to be an inner ear dizzines problem probably resulting from a recent virus infection. The hospital ER phy ician, following a bank of tests administered by the medical staff (EKG, blood ork, coordination, etc.), concluded the `scare' to be a "classic inner ear proble '. I was given medication, and sent home... feeling relieved, albeit That ha�ing been said, my real intent in writing to you is to commend your two Edina Fire Department paramedics on the professional manner in which they carried gut their duties. Their first names are Ryan and Dominic. I do apologize for not lI owing their last names. Their performance and demeanor throughout the incident instilled confidence that I was indeed in the care of two very competent, highly skilled professionals. Having been a career search and rescue pilot and rescueswimmer in the U. S. Coast Guard, I recognize rescue/emergency medical service professionalism when I see it! Ryan and Dominic were calming, and affordec a skillful application of humor as they methodically performed their individL, al tasks with impressive efficiency. When I was involved in the rescue business, I often found humor to be a valuable tool in instilling confidence and calm in Ithose under extreme stress and duress. Ryan and Dominic did so very effectiv ly. When I asked them if they could just perform some quick open heart surgery the ambulance and send me on my way, they did, however, decline my request. This, in retrospect, was probably for the best! after loading me into the unit I misunderstood When they introduced themselves g , Dominic's name to be `Downer' and was blithely corrected. After being released from the hospital, I visited the Fire Station to extend my thanks. I lightheartedly called Dominic `Downer', and we all enjoyed a laugh. I hope that name doesn't stick ... Ijknow how those things go. He and Ryan were immensely uplifting. In closing, please allow me to emphasize my heartfelt gratitude to these two men, to you, and to the Edina Fire Department for the skill and professionalism exhibited this morning. I can think of no superlatives adequate enough to describe their performance. The Edina Fire Department has a tremendous asset in Ryan and Dominic. With My Sincere Thanks, Ronald A. Simons Commander (Retired) United States Coast Guard 6425 City West Parkway, #3307 Eden.Prairie, MN. 5534 L: 154 S'ca n� FCt i z�~rr,ct' 'Pk . J "/I _o lw 7/�cci �u -td- ; -A #V' t>� &A // !L let IL6 c�sTtia s !J A-� _ � U�c .1 s rk fah ?e � s �k �� � . b4f o SUBMITTED PHUTUS Healthy learning Students in grades one through five participated in a health fair at Highlands Elementary School in Edina on March 29. During the all -day events, kids were able to talk to Edina paramedics and sit inside an ambulance. 751 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 273 Regular Meeting, May 8, 2006 Room 349, Edina Community Center AGENDA Determination of Quorum and Call to Order Approval of Minutes of Meeting of April 17, 2006 HEARINGS OF INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS, AND PRESENTATION OF PETITIONS FROM THE PUBLIC REGARDING ITEMS BEFORE THE BOARD FOR ACTION OR ON ANY OTHER ISSUE ( *SEE ATTACHED DETAIL) PRESENTATIONS ➢ "Growing Friends" Prairie Lands Project — Creek Valley Elementary School 3rd Grade Teacher Dana Hardt and Students Abby Conrad and Paige Reno; and Edina High School Environmental Sciences Teacher Eric Burfeind and Students Nick Fedje Rasmus, Bryan Pelach and Savannah Davis ➢ "Edina Unplugged" Event — Edina Unplugged 2006 Steering Committee REPORTS ➢ West Metro Education Program/The Choice. Is Yours — Maria Giampietro, Director of Administrative Services ➢ CBOC Update — Peyton Robb, Board Member and CBOC (Construction Bond Oversight Committee) Chair ACTION 418 Personnel Recommendations 752 -755 419 Expenditures Payable on April 24, 2006, appended 756 420 Expenditures Payable on May 8, 2006, appended 757 421 Bond Fund Expenditures Payable on April 20, 2006 758 -762 422 Bond Fund Expenditures Payable on May 4, 2006 763 -764 423 2006 -2007 Community Education Services Fund (04) Budget 765 -766 424 Revised 2006 -2007 Early Childhood Through Grade 12 School 767 -768 Calendar 425 CBOC Change Orders, Bids, and Purchases 769 426 Countryside Elementary School Continuous Progress Students to 770 Camp St. Croix CONSENT 427 Community Education Services Personnel Recommendations 428 Commendation of Martha Cosgrove 429 Lease Agreement with Daystar, U.S. 430 Lease Agreement with 1 -494 Corridor Commission 431 Lease Agreement with Minnesota Distance Running Association 432 Lease Agreement with Minnesota Council for Gifted & Talented, Inc. 433 Lease Agreement with Republicans — Senate District 41 434 Lease Agreement with West Metro Education Program 435 Lease Agreement with Children's Yamaha Music Schools of Minnesota, Inc. 436 Gift from Starkey Laboratories 437 Gift from Medtronic Foundation 438 Gift from Wells Fargo Foundation Educational Matching Gift Program 439 Gifts from Highlands Elementary School PTA 440 Gift from Our Lady of Grace Parent School Organization 441 Gifts from Creek Valley Elementary School PTA 442 Gift from Countryside Elementary School PTO 443 Gift from _Lester and Jolene Fujitake 444 Gift from Mark and Shirley Lerner 445 Gift from an Anonymous Donor DISCUSSION 446 Board of Education Meeting Dates for 2006 -2007 INFORMATION 447 Enrollment as of April 28, 2006 448 Fashion Design Students Overnight Trip to New York City in 2007 449 Recognition of Staff Adjournment 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 -793 794 *Persons who wish to address the Board are requested to complete and submit an appropriate form to the Board Secretary prior to the designated hearing time. When recognized, each individual shall identify himself /herself and the group represented, if any. He /She shall then state the reason for addressing the Board and shall be limited in time at the discretion of the Board Chair. Individual employees of the School District or representatives of employee. organizations shall have utilized administrative procedures before making a request to address the Board. Page 1 of 2 Darlene Wallin From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 9:16 AM To: Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com Cc: Darlene Wallin; John Keprios Subject: FW: The recent recommendations of the Youth Sport Task Force Jennifer Bennerotte Communications & Marketing Director City of Edina 952 - 833 -9520 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 jennerotte @ci.edina.mn.us From: Bearmon, Paul (M.D.) ( mailto :Paul.Bearmon @ParkNicollet.com] Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 2:01 PM To: alihul @aol.com; jhovland @krauserollins.com; Immasica @aol.com; scot.housh @willis.com; swensonboys @aol.com Cc: Gordon Hughes; Andrew.Finsness @radisson.com; canuckpride40 @msn.com; jljgolf @msn.com; Jesss678 @aol.com; jsorem @mn.rr.com; Ipresthus @mn.rr.com; Damma001 @tc.umn.edu; tfronek @wck.com; John Keprios; SteDove @edina.kl2.mn.us; gklus @trinityms.com; jsitek @mn.rr.com; Harmon, Keith (M.D.); Moris002 @umn.edu; mbrindle @mn.rr.com; michael_weiss @acordia.com; goodnplenty014 @aol.com; Russfortner @hotmail.com; tasp @VTISecurity.com; Susie Miller; Ed MacHolda; Donna Tilsner; colmattson @edina.kl2.mn.us; Dpluth @nminet.net; mamie_s_segall @uhc.com; msegall @mn.rr.com; Slomovas @aol.com Subject: The recent recommendations of the Youth Sport Task Force ( Hi Jennifer - Please forward to both City Council members and Park Board members) Hello Before the final documents of the Youth Task Force were to be presented to Park and Recreation, there was suppose to be a solicitation of Public input. I have asked a variety of people who were involved with this issue if they received any information and the answer has been uniformly no. It is clear those members of the Task Force who from the start made it clear change of any sort was anathema,. enfeebled the language of their final documents. The idea of meaningful community input or objective oversight of youth sports in Edina was never a possibility for these people. The make -up of the the Task Force was not representative of the community - and this was clear from the start. The documents at first appear reasonable, but have no real effect. Little will change, as a matter of fact youth sports in Edina are likely to go backward while other communities are moving forward. Those members of the Task Force opposed to considering new ways of looking at our youth sport programs made sure the documents expressed their narrow views only. The concerns of the community at large were not recognized. 5/16/2006 Page 2 of 2 The grievance process as outlined is unworkable. The long four step process is the fox watching the hen house. A parent and his/her child would risk negative repercussions if this process were pursued - and it would be a tough long road to take. This is the type of process the community wanted changed. There is no provision for any process or group that would give the community a means to help insure youth sports are meeting the needs of all our children, now and into the future. This isn't fair to the large number of people in our community who have voiced their concern about the direction some of our programs take, and felt that maybe for the first time a way to address those concerns was being developed. It isn't fair to our children. It reflects poorly on Edina because we had the chance to make positive changes - and we allowed a narrow interest group to block that chance. No one was asking for the micro management of any association - all that was being asked is that we insure our youth athletic programs have community input and planning - and a way to insure all, not just a select few, of our children are given fair opportunity to grow through sports. Paul Bearmon 5/16/2006 Page 1 of 7 Darlene Wallin From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 8:15 AM To: Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com Cc: Darlene Wallin Subject: FW: Youth Task Force final documents - confidential Jennifer Bennerotte Communications & Marketing Director City of Edina 952- 833 -9520 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 Bennerotte @ci.edina.mn.us From: keep'em All Playing [mailto:keapem @yahoo.com] Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2006 6:36 AM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: Youth Task Force final documents - confidential Hi Jennifer - Please forward to Mayor Hovland and Councilwoman Hulbert Thanks Paul Hello Mayor Hovland - Below I have placed the "Core" document coming out of the Youth Task Force which asks for you signature at the bottom. Following that document I have place the Park Boards "Relationship Agreement." As I mentioned recently - the language of the "Core" document was enfeebled by those members of the Task Force who from the start made it clear change of any sort was anathema. The idea of meaningful community input or objective oversight was never a possibility. To quote Woodie Allen, " Eternal nothingness is fine if you happen to be dressed for it." Reading the document I could hardly imagine the large number of wonderful values which might have been enumerated as worthy of the "belief' of the City of Edina - had only time allowed. The Relationship Agreement is of a similar nature. After basically saying little (" the intent of these guidelines is to to ensure that the associations are mindful (sic!!) of the public's desire for positve and healthy athletic experiences for children and families in our community)." the document arrives at the "grievance process." This process as outlined has at its' end a committee made up of Association Presidents and Park Board members. Kind of the fox watching the hen house thing. A parent and his /her child would risk all sorts of negative repercussions if this process were pursued - and it would be a tough long road to take. 5/16/2006 Page 2 of 7 As an attorney I suspect you will see all sorts of elements in these documents lacking in definition, purpose or useful effect. This is a far stretch from a process or group that would give the community a means to help insure youth sports are meeting the needs of our children, now and into the future. It isnt fair to the large number of people in our community who have voiced their concern about the direction some of our programs take, and felt that maybe for the first time a way to address those concerns was being developed. It isnt fair to our children. I would very much welcome a chance to discuss this further with you, either privately or with Dr. Hulbert (Alice to those who know her well). Please give us the opportunity to review options with you that will better serve our community, and make Edina a true leader in this area. Sincerely, Paul Bearmon Youth Sports Core Values and Community Strategy 1. The City of Edina believes in the benefits and attraction of youth sports as a means to teach the children of this community values and skills that will be of benefit to them throughout life; and 2. We believe that Edina's youth athletic associations develop fundamental internal and external assets for children by providing opportunities to develop positive character traits and life values where children can learn a multitude of important lessons and valuable fundamentals, such as ethics, abiding by the rules, winning and losing with grace, coping with success and failure, always trying to do your best, respecting authority figures; learning about team work, developing fundamental motor skills and sports specific knowledge; and 3. We believe that the most important underlying mission for every youth athletic association is to develop emotionally, socially, and physically healthy children; and 4. We believe that youth sports programs conducted under the right conditions are . enormously beneficial for children; and 5. We recognize the need to ensure that Edina's youth athletic association programs provide athletic programs that are safe, positive, fun, physically and psychologically age- appropriate, educational, teaches values and ethics, strengthens the community, promotes competition without conflict, open to all residents of all abilities and should not be denied an opportunity to participate based on ability, offer a reasonable number of events, and are administered by qualified volunteers; and 6. We believe that youth sports association league organizers and administrators must be educated on how to provide a safe, positive, and fun youth sports environment before being granted access to public facilities; and Page 3 of 7 7. We believe volunteer coaches and parents must receive orientation and education as to the individual roles and responsibilities in our community's effort to raise the standards of youth sports programs and that volunteer coaches and parents be held accountable for their behaviors; and 8. We believe it is necessary and desirable to establish guidelines, requirements and standards for youth sports associations utilizing public facilities; and 9. We recognize the need to ensure that Edina's youth athletic associations form and advertise a formal grievance process by which residents are assured of an appropriate venue and process to hear their grievances in a manner that is open, fair, and just; and The City of Edina in a meeting duly assembled and by the authority thereof, recognize and encourage official implementation of this Community Strategy to improve the culture of youth sports for all participants. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS day of 2006. Signed: Mayor of Edina YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION'S RELATIONSHIP WITH THE EDINA PARK BOARD AND THE PARK AND RECREATION STAFF (RELATIONSHIP DOCUMENT) The mission of the Edina Park and Recreation Department is to do our part in further developing, preserving, and maintaining the City of Edina's parks, recreation programs, and resources as a premier and comprehensive park and recreation department in the Twin Cities area. This relationship document between the Edina Park and Recreation Department, Park Board, and with each association, establishes a common set of guidelines that are to be adopted by all athletic associations. The intent of these guidelines is to ensure that associations are mindful of the public's desire for positive and healthy athletic experiences for children and families in our community. The "Youth Sports Core Values and Community Strategy," established by the Edina Park Board in cooperation with the Edina Park and Recreation Department, is to be adopted by all 5/16/2006 Page 4 of 7 associations. This "Community Strategy" formally defines the City's core values and philosophy in the delivery of the community's youth sports programs. 1. Edina Park and Recreation Department will provide facilities and fields for boys and girls at each age group within the association. 2. It is the City of Edina's view that the public is best served when there is only one independently incorporated youth athletic association per sport. The City of Edina also understands and supports that in some cases the public and volunteers are best served by having the traveling component of a particular sport administered by its own independent youth athletic association. 3. The Edina Park and Recreation Department in cooperation with the Park Board will help each association plan, and provide safe and well maintained public athletic facilities to meet the youth sports programs, and give professional staff liaison services regarding the operation of their association, and offer appropriate clerical and administrative support services. 4. The Edina Park and Recreation Department shall.act as a liaison between the associations and the Edina Park Board to assist associations in providing a well rounded and equitable program for all participants. The Edina Park Board expects that all associations follow these minimal guidelines in the operation of their association: 1. All boys and girls have a fun, positive, safe, age- appropriate, educational experience that is open to all residents of all abilities, and receive equal opportunity to participate at whatever ability level they may play. 2. Boys and girls build good sportsmanship and character; learn to be a team member; learn to accept discipline; incorporate psychological and physical health_ 3. Boys and girls, at each level of play, will receive basic fundamental and skill training in the sport in which they participate. 4. Associations manage team schedules and provide equitable playing time for each level of competition within the age group. 5/16/2006 Page 5 of 7 5. Associations shall have a common code of conduct for players, coaches and parents. 6. Qualified citizen volunteers should serve in positions as Board of Directors. Board of Directors must have knowledge of the program/sport. Associations are encouraged to have open member elections to elect Board of Directors. 7. Edina Park and Recreation Department personnel shall attend at least semi - annually association board meetings. Department personnel shall be available and provide resource help to associations in training of coaches, operations, and other functions with which the association needs assistance. 8. The Park and Recreation Department mandates background checks on all individuals 18 & older who serve as a coach, referee, and each person serving on the Board of Directors in any association. It is our intent to protect our children, families and the associations. 9. To ensure that the public has an open, fair and just process to handle grievances that are not resolved at the association board or staff level, the City of Edina will facilitate a grievance process. (See Appendix 1.1) This grievance process is not intended to deal with team assignment, coach assignment or tryout process grievances. 10. The Edina Park and Recreation Department shall establish minimum insurance requirements of each and every association that uses Edina's public athletic facilities. This insurance shall provide for the protection of volunteers, associations, and the City of Edina. (referred to insurance consultant) 11. The Edina Park Board and Park and Recreation Department shall provide and review annually guidelines to be followed by all associations and users of facilities and gymnasiums in our community as to the priority use of the Edina School District's gymnasiums and facilities, and the Edina community practice and game facilities. This is to assure a fair allocation of gymnasiums and facilities use for all participants, at all levels. It is imperative that all associations, coaches, board members, volunteers and parents understand and appreciate the positive experience that is desired for all participants in Edina youth sports. Therefore, the Edina Park and Recreation Department and Park Board mandate that all new 5/16/2006 Page 6 of 7 parents, volunteers, coaches, board members, etc., who participate in associations must read, understand and sign a copy of the relationship agreement and Youth Sports Core Values and Community Strategy. Signed copies of these documents will be kept on file with the association. Appendix 1.1 The City of Edina demands that each youth athletic association must have in place a well - documented and publicized grievance process by which residents are assured of an appropriate venue and process to hear their grievances in a manner that is open, fair, and just. If the youth athletic association board grievance process does not resolve the issue, then the matter will be referred to Park and Recreation Department staff. If staff is unable to resolve the issue, the matter should then be referred to the Ad -Hoc Grievance Committee. The Ad -Hoc Grievance Committee will be made up of three association presidents who are not president of the association in question, plus two Park Board members. Those five individuals will hear the complaint and make recommendations to solve the grievance matter. If the Ad -Hoc Grievance Committee's recommendations do not satisfy the parties involved then the grievance will be referred to the Park Board for a final decision. The Ad -Hoc Grievance Committee will be formed only on an as needed basis to deal with issues on a case by case basis. The following escalation shall be followed: Step #1: Follow the written grievance procedure as established and publicized for each youth athletic association. Step #2: If, in the complainant's view, the issue was not resolved in Step #1, then the complainant should contact Park and Recreation Department staff, who will do the following: A. Evaluate the complaint. 5/16/2006 Page 7 of 7 B. Determine and judge whether or not the issue can or should be resolved through diplomacy. If so, staff will facilitate a problem - solving process at the staff level with the appropriate community members and volunteers involved. Step #3: If the issue is unresolved at the staff level, then staff will assemble the Ad -Hoc Grievance Committee to hear the complaint. With staff assistance and input from the parties involved, the Ad -Hoc Grievance Committee will hear the complaint and make recommendations. It will be the Ad -Hoc Grievance Committee's duty to determine whether or not the association has acted in a manner that is contrary to the City's philosophy and core values; and if so, make recommendations to correct the situation. It will not be the Ad- Hoc Grievance Committee's duty to micro -manage program decisions of Edina's youth athletic associations. Step #4: If the parties involved are still not satisfied with the Ad -Hoc Grievance Committee's recommendations, the final step is to refer the matter to the Park Board for a final decision. Both parties must abide by the Park Board's decision or they could face sanctions. 5/16/2006 T Page 1 of 4 Darlene Wallin From: Bearmon, Paul (M.D.) [Paul.Bearmon @ParkNicollet.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 2:46 PM To: John Keprios Cc: jhovland @krauserollins.com; Immasica @aol.com; swensonboys @aol.com; scot.housh @willis.com; alihul @aol.com Subject: The recent recommendations of the Youth Sport Task Force 2 Hi John - With all due respect, it is disingenuous to suggest this process solicited public input. The public was not aware that your final documents were being presented. The only way the public was ever aware there even was a task force is because I emailed the many people in our community who had contacted my organization - KEAP. I also went to the various list servers of our schools and let folks know. There was little help from the Park and Recreation department, and I believe this reflected the sentiments of that department. To review how the Task Force came into being - Annie Glavan had come to the Park Board asking that her group of 20 or so 5th grade girls have minimal access to gyms. Annie's concern was that her young players were not interested in the weak house offerings, and were not interested in the intense schedule offered through travel. It was then argued by the basketball association that there should be only one organization allowed to have access, and that if Annie received any time - the whole board would resign!! The Park board denied Annie's request. This was especially problematic in that only a year previously the Park board allowed an "elite" baseball team that had left the Baseball association to have field access at the same reduced rates given to the main Baseball association. I came to that meeting and brought out somewhat different concerns. I pointed out that there was at least a 10:1 discrepancy in resource allotment by one of our associations when looking at 6th grade boys travel versus house. I pointed out these were public facilities and there was no rational basis for this discrepancy. I talked about the effects of excluding children at such young ages from fair access and how irrational and unfair this was from multiple perspectives. I wasn't arguing that every child should have the intense experience of travel. I was asking that the community be allowed a means to have input into how programs which affect their children are run. A 1977 document was subsequently brought forth to describe the "relationship" between Park and Recreation and the associations. This document was shortly thereafter updated with new language which weakened the already minimal role of Park and Recreation in overseeing the associations - and thereby allowed what was going on to continue. Despite the fact that it was said to have had Council approval - it didn't. Apparently the concern about how public resources were being controlled and allocated without any community input caught people's attention and it was recommended that a Task Force be set up. The final documents put forth by the Task Force, as I recently pointed out, do little in terms of giving the community a means of insuring the youth sport programs in Edina are meeting the needs of our children. The hyped "grievance process" only formalizes a process that is problematic for the many reasons brought forth by the community. 5/16/2006 I Page 2 of 4 Edina - by virtue of the Task Force - was in a prime position to be a leader in recognizing the issues surrounding youth sports and taking a proactive role. It would have been seen as progressive and responsive - and our children and community would have benefited. It still can be - with help from our Mayor and City Council. Paul Bearmon From: [mailto:alihul @aol.com] Sent: Tue 5/16/2006 12:41 PM To: Cc: Subject: Re: The recent recommendations of the Youth Sport Task Force Hi John! I have concerns regarding input on the documents adopted by the Park Board. I understand that they are available online and that they were sent to the athletic association and their views were solicited. Having the documents available online is not the same as soliciting input. I think we all are aware of who the major players are in this debate and would like to know if they were afforded the same courtesy extended to the athletic association presidents- were the drafts forwarded to them with a request that they review them and offer input? This process must be totally fair and above reproach, no one should be given the "inside track" while others are left to monitor the web site on a daily basis for information. Thanks for clearing this up for me! Alice - - - -- Original Message---- - From: John Keprios <JKeprios @ci.edina.mn.us> To: Jennifer Bennerotte <JBennerotte @ci.edina.mn.us >; Alice Hulbert <alihul @aol.com >; Ann Swenson <swensonboys @aol.com >; Jim Hovland <jhovland @krauserollins.com >; Linda Masica <Immasica @aol.com >; scot.housh @willis.com Cc: Darlene Wallin <> Sent: Tue, 16 May 2006 09:20:32 -0500 Subject: RE: The recent recommendations of the Youth Sport Task Force FYI, the final documents were mailed or emailed to all those who requested copies and also to all youth athletic association presidents. The documents are also posted on our website. The meetings appear on cable television where it is also mentioned that the documents are available through either the Park and Recreation Department or online. John Keprios, Director Edina Park & Recreation Department 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Voice: (952) 826 -0430 5/16/2006 Page 3 of 4 Fax: (952) 826 -0385 jkeprios@ci.edina.mn.us From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 9:16 AM To: Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com Cc: Darlene Wallin; John Keprios Subject: FW: The recent recommendations of the Youth Sport Task Force Jennifer Bennerotte Communications & Marketing Director City of Edina 952 - 833 -9520 FAX 952- 826 -0390 jbennerotte @ci.edina.mn.us From: Bearmon, Paul (M.D.) [ mailto :Paul.Bearmon @ParkNicollet.com] Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 2:01 PM To: alihul @aol.com; jhovland @krauserollins.com; Immasica @aol.com; scot.housh @willis.com; swensonboys @aol.com Cc: Gordon Hughes; Andrew.Finsness @radisson.com; can uckpride40C&msn.com; jljgolf @msn.com; _) esss678 @ao_l.com;_jsorem @mn.rr.com; Ipresthus @mn.rr.com; )amma001 @tc.umn.edu; tfronek @wck.com; John Keprios; SteDove @edina.kl2.mn.us; gklus @trinityms.com; jsitek @mn.rr.com; Harmon, Keith (M.D.); Moris002 @umn.edu; mbrindle @mn.rr.com; michael_weiss @acordia.com; goodnplenty014 @aol.com; Russfortner @hotmail.com; tasp @VTISecurity.com; Susie Miller; Ed MacHolda; Donna Tilsner; colmattson @edina.kl2.mn.us; Dpluth @nminet.net; mamie_s_segall@uhc.com; msegall @mn.rr.com; Slomovas @aol.com Subject: The recent recommendations of the Youth Sport Task Force ( Hi Jennifer - Please forward to both City Council members and Park Board members) Hello Before the final documents of the Youth Task Force were to be presented to Park and Recreation, there was suppose to be a solicitation of Public input. I have asked a variety of people who were involved with this issue if they received any information and the answer has been uniformly no. It is clear those members of the Task Force who from the start made it clear change of any sort was anathema, enfeebled the language of their final documents. The idea of meaningful community input or objective oversight of youth sports in Edina was never a possibility for these people. The make -up of the the Task Force was not representative of the community - and this was clear from the start. The documents at first appear reasonable, but have no real effect. Little will change, as a matter of fact youth sports in Edina are likely to go backward while other communities are moving forward. Those members of the Task Force opposed to considering new ways of looking at our youth sport programs made sure the documents expressed their narrow views only. The concerns of the community at large were not recognized. The grievance process as outlined is unworkable. The long four step process is the fox watching the hen house. A parent and his/her child would risk negative repercussions if this process were pursued - and it would be a tough long road to take. This is the type of process the community wanted changed. 5/16/2006 Page 4 of 4 There is no provision for any process or group that would give the community a means to help insure youth sports are meeting the needs of all our children now and into the future. This isn't fair to the large number of people in our community who have voiced their concern about the direction some of our programs take, and felt that maybe for the first time a way to address those concerns was being developed. It isn't fair to our children. It reflects poorly on Edina because we had the chance to make positive changes - and we allowed a narrow interest group to block that chance. No one was asking for the micro management of any association - all that was being asked is that we insure our youth athletic programs have community input and planning - and a way to insure all, not just a select few, of our children are given fair opportunity to grow through sports. Paul Bearmon Check out AOL.com today_. Breaking news, video search, pictures, email and IM. All on demand. Always Free. 5/16/2006