HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-06-20_COUNCIL MEETING•
,_f
Memo
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Gordon Hughes
Date: 6/15/2006 ,
Re: 2007 Budget Forecast
On June 20th, the City Council will conduct a 5:30 PM work session to preview
forecasts with respect to the 2007 City of Edina budget. The purpose of this work
session is to discuss the assumptions and issues that will be used to craft the formal
budget document this summer. This memo provides background information to aid
in Tuesday's discussions.
Using our "budget assumptions" modeling, we have prepared budget "scenarios" for
your consideration. As in past years, we will be able to work with these scenarios
during our workshop session on June 20t". Three scenarios are attached to this
memo. Scenario 1 is a compilation of all of the requests and recommendations
submitted by our department heads. Scenarios 2 & 3 illustrate alternatives to
scenario 1.
RECAP OF LEGISLATIVE CHANGES
The 2006 legislature did not enact any significant changes to property tax laws.
Therefore, the City s 2007 budget planning will not be affected by levy limits, property
tax freezes, or any other provisions that would further restrict the Council's budget
considerations. On the other hand, no corrections were made to the law concerning
Market Value Homestead Credit (MVHC) and, therefore, the City must continue to
include in its tax levy amounts necessary to offset this lost aid.
The 2005 legislature approved significant increases in employer and employee
contributions to PERA (the State's pension program for public employees.) In 2006,
the employer contribution for police and fire employees increased by almost 13% and
the employer contribution for other employees increased by 8.5 %. In 2007, we
estimate the City's PERA contribution will increase by $90,000 over and above
normal increases. The 2005 legislation included subsequent rate increases for 2008,
2009 and 2010.
EXPENDITURES FOR 2007
The following expenditure forecasts are included in the scenarios:
Wage and Employee Benefits. 2007 is the second year of the two year
contracts negotiated with four of the five bargaining units which represent a
portion of our employees. (The public works and park maintenance union
bargained only a one year contract.) The budget forecast includes the three
percent wage increase negotiated in these two year contracts. An additional
Y2% has been included to account for employees who will go through salary
steps in 2007.
Insurance Increases. Employee health insurance is expected to increase
16% for 2006. Our forecast includes a $60 per month per employee increase
in the City's contribution toward employee insurance coverage. This amount
approximates the premium increase in single coverage and covers one half
or more of the premium increase for employees selecting dependent
coverage.
• Contractual Services, Commodities, etc. A three percent across the board
increase in contractual services, commodities and central service expenses
are projected for next year.
• Budget Adjustments. Our department heads have submitted proposed
new programs /expenditures for 2007. Memorandums outlining their
recommendations are attached and have been included with the budget
scenarios.
• Capital Plan Appropriation. The general fund appropriation to the Capital
Improvement Plan (CIP) remains at $50,000. However, we again would like
to discuss the possibility of transferring a portion of the general fund balance
resulting from the 2005 surplus to the CIP.
REVENUES FOR 2007
The following revenue forecasts are included in the scenarios:
Non Tax revenues. In past years, we have followed a conservative
approach in forecasting revenues from "non -tax" sources. Based upon our
experience in recent years (especially the 2005 budget year), we are
comfortable in projecting additional revenues from building permits,
ambulance fees and investment earnings due to higher short term interest
rates. These added revenues reduce dependence on property tax revenues
to support the 2007 budget.
• Budget Reserves. The Council previously discussed the possibility of
applying some of the 2005 surplus to the 2007 budget. As a result of that
discussion, the bulk of this surplus was retained in the General Fund pending
• Page 2
W
final decisions concerning the 2007 budget. The Council should be cautious
in utilizing General Fund surpluses to fund ongoing costs in the City's
operating budget. Although this would serve to reduce the 2007 tax levy, it
would result in a higher than normal tax levy increase in 2008 when `one time"
revenues might not be available to augment the budget. Generally speaking,
the agencies that assign our bond ratings question the use of reserves for this
purpose. If the Council wishes to apply General Fund surplus to the 2007
budget, we recommend that they should be applied to non - recurring
expenses. For example, we have recommended in the budget scenarios that
it would be appropriate to fund the costs of preparing the comprehensive plan
update in that this expense is not a recurring cost. We will be prepared to
discuss other options for these funds at the work session.
CALENDAR
June 20, 2006 Budget Assumption work session
July 28, 2006 Budget submitted to Council
August 1, 2006 Budget hearing
September 5, 2006 Council resolution setting maximum tax levy
December Truth in Taxation hearings and final budget adoption.
• Page 3
, r
SCENARIO USED
TOTAL REVENUES
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
% INCREASE IN EXPENDITURES
GENERAL FUND PROPERTY TAX
% INCREASE PROPERTY TAX
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
BUDGET
PROPOSED
2004
2005
2006
200
2005
2006
INCREASE
2007
22,524,128
25,487,680
25,380,248
27,484,353
22,281,367
24,285,722
25,380,248
27484353 _
4.34%
9.00%
5.70%
3,487,894
15,635,440
17,191,143
18,560,151
20 014 509
0.03%
9.95%
4.43%
_ 2,479,957
G:Oudge0007 BudgetWIODEL 2007As 61132006
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
BUDGETED
ASSUMP %
PROPOSED
2004
2005
2006
INCREASE
2007
SALARIES /BENEFITS & STEP
15,045,791
15,797,191
16,943,761
3.50%
17,536,793
CONTRACTUAL SVCS.
2,937,131
3,028,761
3,386,305
3.00%
3,487,894
COMMODITIES
1,067,557
1,160,818
1,216,209
3.00%
1,252,695
CENTRAL SERVICES
_ 2,479,957
2,563,534
2,592,768
3.00%
2,670,551
EQUIPMENT
700,931
1,685,418
1,191,205
3.00%
1,226,941
CAPITAL PLAN APPROPRIATION
50,000
50,000
50,000
0.00 °!0
50,000
EXPENDITURE ADJUSTMENTS
589,901
749,887
1,190,230
i
- 1,259479 Vi
REVENUE ADJUSTMENTS
22,281,367
24,285,722
25,380,248
27,484,353
22,524,128
25,487,680
% INCREASE IN EXPENDITURES
8.29%
27,484,353
$ INCREASE IN EXPENDITURES
2,104,105
G:Oudge0007 BudgetWIODEL 2007As 61132006
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
BUDGETED
ASSUMP %
PROPOSED
2004
2005
2006
INCREASE
2007
PROPERTY TAXES
15,635,440
17,191,143
18,560,151
20,014,509
MARKET VALUEIABATEMENTS
-
-
(457,664)
(400,000)
LICENSES & PERMITS
2,247,759
3,240,622
2,256,550
3.00%
2,324,247
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
960,000
1,147,345
720,608
3.00%
742,226
FEES AND CHARGES
2,227,955
2,415,766
2,235,373
F 3.00%
2,302,434
FINES & FORFEITURES
863,073
742,917
875,000
0.00%
875,000
OTHER REVENUES & TRANSFERS
589,901
749,887
1,190,230
3.00%
1,225,937
REVENUE ADJUSTMENTS
TOTAL REVENUES
22,524,128
25,487,680
25,380,248
27,484,353
% INCREASE IN REVENUES
8.29%
$ INCREASE IN REVENUES
2,104,105
G:Oudge0007 BudgetWIODEL 2007As 61132006
GlBudgefl2007 BudgetWODEL 2007.)ds 61732006
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
BUDGET
PROPOSED
2004
2004
2005
2006
2007
15,635,440
SCENARIO USED
18,560,151
19,207,170
MARKET VALUE/ABATEMENTS
-
TOTAL REVENUES,
22,524,128
25,487,680
25,380,248
26,747,014
2,247,759
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
22,281,367
24,285,722
25,380,248
26_ 747 014
960,000
% INCREASE IN EXPENDITURES
4.34%
9.00%
5.70%
FEES AND CHARGES
2,227,955
GENERAL FUND PROPERTY TAX
15,635,440
17,191,143
18,560,151
19 207170
863,073
% INCREASE PROPERTY TAX
0.03%
9.95%
4.43%
OTHER REVENUES & TRANSFERS
589,901
2007 GENERAL
FUND BUDGET
ASSUMPTIONS
1,225,937
REVENUE ADJUSTMENTS
PROPOSED
470.000
TOTAL REVENUES
22,524,128
25,487,680
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
BUDGETED
ASSUMP%
PROPOSED
% INCREASE
2004
2005
2006
INCREASE
2007
SALARIES/BENEFITS & STEP
15,045,791
15,797,191
16,943,761
3.50%
17,536,793
CONTRACTUAL SVCS.
2,937,131
3,028,761
3,386,305
3.00%
3,487,894
COMMODITIES
1,067,557
1,160,818
1,216,209
3.00%
1,252,695
CENTRAL SERVICES
2,479,957
2,563,534
2,592,768
3.00%
2,670,551
EQUIPMENT
700,931
1,685,418
1,191,205
3.00%
1,226,941
CAPITAL PLAN APPROPRIATION
50,000
50,000
50,000
0.00%
50,000
EXPENDITURE ADJUSTMENTS
522140
22,281,367
24,285,722
25,380,248
26,747,014
% INCREASE IN EXPENDITURES
5.39%
$ INCREASE IN EXPENDITURES
1,366,766
GlBudgefl2007 BudgetWODEL 2007.)ds 61732006
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
BUDGETED ASSUMP %
PROPOSED
2004
2005
2006 INCREASE
2007
PROPERTY TAXES
15,635,440
17,191,143
18,560,151
19,207,170
MARKET VALUE/ABATEMENTS
-
-
(457,664)
(400,000)
LICENSES & PERMITS
2,247,759
3,240,622
2,256,550
3.00%
2,324,247
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
960,000
1,147,345
720,608
3.00%
742,226
FEES AND CHARGES
2,227,955
2,415,766
2,235,373
3.00%
2,302,434
FINES & FORFEITURES
863,073
742,917
875,000
0.00%
875,000
OTHER REVENUES & TRANSFERS
589,901
749,887
1,190,230
3.00%
1,225,937
REVENUE ADJUSTMENTS
470.000
TOTAL REVENUES
22,524,128
25,487,680
25,380,248
26,747,014
% INCREASE
IN REVENUES
5.39%
$ INCREASE IN REVENUES
1,366,766
GlBudgefl2007 BudgetWODEL 2007.)ds 61732006
TOTAL REVENUES 22,524,128 25,487,680 25,380,248 27,039,414
% INCREASE IN REVENUES 6.54%
$ INCREASE IN REVENUES 1,659,166
GASudgelt2007 Budget\MODEL 2007.)ds 6/13/1006
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
BUDGET
PROPOSED
2004 2
2004
2005
2006
-1007
15,635,440 1
SCENARIO USED
18,560,151 1
19,427,890
MARKET VALUEIABATEMENTS -
- -
_
)
TOTAL REVENUES
22,524,128
25,487,680
25,380,248
27,039,414
2,256,550 3.00% 2
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
22,281,367
24,285,722
25,380,248
27039414 _ ,
742,226
% INCREASE IN EXPENDITURES
4.34%
9.00%
5.70%
2,302,434
FINES & FORFEITURES 8
GENERAL FUND PROPERTY TAX
15,635,440
17,191,143
18,560,151
19
589,901 7
% INCREASE PROPERTY TAX
0.03%
9.95%
4.43%
2007 GENERAL
FUND :
. ASSUMPTIONS
PROPOSED
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
BUDGETED
ASSUMP %
PROPOSED
2004
2005
2006
INCREASE
2007
SALARIES /BENEFITS & STEP
15,045,791
15,797,191
16,943,761
3.50%
17,536,793
CONTRACTUAL SVCS.
2,937,131
3,028,761
3,386,305
3.00%
3,487,894
COMMODITIES
1,067,557
1,160,818
1,216,209
3.00%
1,252,695
CENTRAL SERVICES
2,479,957
2,563,534
2,592,768
3.00%
2,670,551
EQUIPMENT
700,931
1,685,418
1,191,205
3.00%
1,226,941
CAPITAL PLAN APPROPRIATION
50,000
50,000
50,000
0.00%
50,000
EXPENDITURE ADJUSTMENTS
814.540 J
22,281,367
24,285,722
25,380,248
27,039,414
% INCREASE IN EXPENDITURES
6.54%
$ INCREASE IN EXPENDITURES
1,659,166
TOTAL REVENUES 22,524,128 25,487,680 25,380,248 27,039,414
% INCREASE IN REVENUES 6.54%
$ INCREASE IN REVENUES 1,659,166
GASudgelt2007 Budget\MODEL 2007.)ds 6/13/1006
ACTUAL A
ACTUAL B
BUDGETED ASSUMP % P
PROPOSED
2004 2
2005 2
2006 INCREASE 2
2007
PROPERTY TAXES 1
15,635,440 1
17,191,143 1
18,560,151 1
19,427,890
MARKET VALUEIABATEMENTS -
- -
- (
(457,664) (
(400,000)
LICENSES & PERMITS 2
2,247,759 3
3,240,622 2
2,256,550 3.00% 2
2,324,247
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 9
960,000 1
1,147,345 7
720,608 3.00% 7
742,226
FEES AND CHARGES 2
2,227,955 2
2,415,766 2
2,235,373 3.00% 2
2,302,434
FINES & FORFEITURES 8
863,073 7
742,917 8
875,000 0.00% 8
875,000
OTHER REVENUES & TRANSFERS 5
589,901 7
749,887 1
1,190,230 3.00% 1
1,225,937
REVENUE ADJUSTMENTS
GASudgelt2007 Budget\MODEL 2007.)ds 6/13/1006
TOTAL REVENUE ADJUSTMENTS
400,000 470,000 541,680
G:%Budgett2007 BudgetVAODEL 2007.xis 6/13/2006
SCENARIO 1
SCENARIO 2
SCENARIO 3
REVENUE ADJUSTMENT ITEMS:
Licenses and permits
200,000
200,000
200,000
Ambulance revenues
125,000
125,000
125,000
Investment earnings
45,000
45,000
45,000
2005 reserves
30,000
100,000
100,000
Utility reimbursement - Engineering Dept.
71,680
TOTAL REVENUE ADJUSTMENTS
400,000 470,000 541,680
G:%Budgett2007 BudgetVAODEL 2007.xis 6/13/2006
2007 GENERAL FUND :
ASSUMPTIONS
(85,000)
(85,000)
-PROPOSED
(10,000)
(10,000)
(10,000)
WORKS PUBLIC
Engineering staff ($56,000 + 28% benefits)
SCENARIO 1
SCENARIO 2
SCENARIO 3
MAYOR •
Professional services
5,000
15,000
5,000
Continuing education
2,000
10,000
10,000
Meeting expense
2,000
35,000
2,000
ADMINISTRATION
40,000
40,000
40,000
Professional services
3,000
'Continuing education
2,000
2,000
Mileage (10% increase)
1,700
1,700
1,700
2007 Comprehensive plan
30,000
100,000
100,000
ELECTIONS
54,000
54,000
54,000
Professional services - equipment maintenance
7,000
7,000
7,000
Conferences
2,000
2,000
General supplies for voting stations /signs /flags /ink/etc.
6,280
3,000
3,000
ASSESSING
GIS digital Imaging
5,200
LEGAL • COURT
Prosecuting
(85,000)
(85,000)
(85,000)
Prisoner room & board
(10,000)
(10,000)
(10,000)
WORKS PUBLIC
Engineering staff ($56,000 + 28% benefits)
71,680
1,200
71,680
Street maintenance staff ($40,000 + 28% benefits)
51,200
15,000
Complaint management software - no estimate
Heat & fuel
10,000
10,000
10,000
Salt
35,000
35,000
35,000
Asphalt
40,000
40,000
40,000
Emergency arrow board
35,000
Traffic trailer ($10K) & 2 permanent speed signs ($41K)
18,000
Traffic signal upgrades
9,000
Equipment replacement
169,759
Oil, fuel, lubricants ($60,000 A 90 %)
54,000
54,000
54,000
.•
Detective ($63,000 + 28% benefits)
80,640
80,640 .
Commercial officer ($59,000 + 28% benefits)
75,520
ME
Inspector /educatorlfirefighter ($61 ,000 + 28% benefits) 78,080
Paramedic/fireflghter ($60,000 + 28% benefits) 76,800 76,800
- OT reduction from above new position (20,000) (20,000)
INSPECTIONS
Support staff - no estimate
Inspection staff - 2 PT positions
91,000
91,000 91,000
Continuing education & telephone
1,200
1,200 1,200
Vehicle for new Inspector added in 2006
15,000
15,000
Complaint management software - no estimate
-
2006 Needs assessment survey (one -time request)
(19,000)
(19,000) (19,000)
Paths and hard surfaces
19,000
19,000
GABudgett2007 Budget\MODEL 2007.xis 6/13/2006
2007 GENERAL FUND BUDGET ASSUMPTIONS
- PROPOSED EXPENDITURE ADJUSTMENTS-
SCENARIO 1 SCENARIO 2 SCENARIO)
NON-DEPARTMENTAL
Wellness program
Clothing allowance
RECORDS
Electronic imaging
101:401111 FAW44 Vital
•
New IT staff ($40,000 + 28% benefits)
Training - security awareness ($2,000)
Software for newly installed desktops ($9,600)
Network backup system ($30,000)
Service contracts -bldg security /help desk/fiber ($9,000)
Network Infrastructure ($25,000)
CENTRAL SERVICES - GENERAL
PERA increase
Insurance - employee health Ob $60 /month per emp
Liability and other insurance
'CENTRAL SERVICES - CITY HALL
Light & power
Heat
TOTAL EXPENDITURE ADJUSTMENTS
5,000 5,000
2,000
20,000 -
33,280 33,280
1,300
6,240 6,240 6,240
19,500 -
5,850
16,250 -
90,000
90,000
90,000
112,000
112,000
112,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
20,000
20,000
20,000
814.540
522.140
1.259.479
G:Sudgefl2007 BudgetVAODEL 2007.xis 6/13/2006
Memo
Ta Gordon Hughes, City Manager
From: Marty Scheerer, Fire Chief
CC: John Wallin, Finance Director
Date: June 1, 2006
Re: 2007 Fire Department Budget Assumptions Forecast
The following is a forecast for the 2007 Edina Fire Department budget:
• Ambulance fees should increase by 5% and revenue should increase by 3% ($37,700) to
$1,275,000. All other fire department revenues should increase by 3% if fees are increased
3%
• Personal Services will increase by 3% as per negotiated contract
• Contracted Services and Commodities budget should increase by 4% due to increased cost
• Central Services will be forecast by administration and public works.
• Equipment replacement should increase from $189,695 to $200,000 ($10,305) with a 2 -3%
yearly increase thereafter.
• The total fire department budget would increase by 4 %, with revenues increasing by 3%
Additional budget items I would like to recommend for your consideration are:
• Re- evaluate the fire station #1 remodel project. The $700,000 project is very costly ($450
sq /ft), inefficient and not the best use of the funding. I would recommend a more
comprehensive and cost effective ($250 sq/ft) remodeling project. It would essentially remodel
the entire office/work and living areas of fire station #1 and cost approximately 2.5 million and
extend the useful life of the structure by 30 years.
• Add an additional full -time inspector /public educator /ff position ($61,000) to the fire department
staff for inspections and public education.
• Add an additional full -time paramedic -ff position to the fire department staff ($60,000), this
position would fill in for injured FF's on 24 -hour shift and be assigned to 40 hour week doing
inspections when there are no injuries and would reduce the overtime budget by a significant
amount (estimated $30,000) and help reduce the number of EMS calls transferred to other
services.
�7I P-1
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF EDINA
DATE: June 2, 2006
TO: John Wallin
Gordon Hughes
FROM: Wayne'Houle
SUBJECT: 2007 Public Works Budget Assumptions (revised)
Public Works is proposing the following additions to help maintain our level of service within
the next year:
Equipment Replacement: +$169,759
The equipment replacement fund continues to be under funded according to the equipment
replacement schedule. The 2006 budget provided $489,635; the equipment replacement
schedule requires $659,394 to be fully funded. Without the required funding some equipment
will not be replaced as fast as they should.
Heat and Fuel: +$10,000
Market conditions for fuel and heat continue to increase beyond the normal 3% increase. We
expect this increase to continue this coming winter.
Equipment Operation: +$60,000
Our mechanics are seeing a drastic increase in lubricants (hydraulics and engine oil) for the
fleet along with increases for gas and diesel.
Salt: +$35,000
We anticipate the cost of salt for ice control to increase due to increase in fuel costs to
transport the salt to the State. We are also using more treated salt to help reduce the amount
of sand that we place. We should know in July what the cost will be for 2007.
Asphalt Material: +$40,000
Our current asphalt allotment includes milling and patching roadways in Edina. Asphalt costs
continue to increase due to fuel costs increases. The 2006 commodities bid reflected an
increase of over 20% for asphalt.
Maintenance People (Street Department) +$40,000
Currently a position is frozen in the Street Department. Staff is requesting that this position
be filled in 2007.
Page 2 of 2
2007 Budget Assumptions
June 2, 2006
Emergency Warning — Arrow Board +$35,000
Emergency arrow board for Public Works Street and utility maintenance. This solar powered
reader board would be used for a prewarning to the traveling public for work being performed
within the right -of -way. This request could be partnered with the Utility Department.
Traffic Trailer / Permanent signage +$18,000
The current traffic trailer, which was placed into service approximately 8 years ago, is past its
useful life due to the drastic increase in maintenance of the trailer. Costs for traffic trailers
and permanent traffic signs (that indicate speed) have substantially come down in price in the
past few years. We would anticipate a new traffic trailer to cost about $10,000 and each sign
about $3,000 to $4,000 (installed). This request could be partnered with the Police
Department.
Traffic Signal Upgrades +$9,000
Approximately 10 out of the 52 traffic signal systems in Edina have Emergency Vehicle Pre-
emptions (EVP) installed. EVP's allow Fire and Police Department vehicles priority when
entering the intersection while under emergency response mode. The anticipated cost per
intersection is $3,000. We are proposing to upgrade. three intersections per year until all of
the intersections have EVP capability. This request could be partnered with the Fire
Department.
Engineering Staff +$56,000
The Engineering Department continues to be overwhelmed by the amount of projects
requested and expected. The long -term requirements placed by the state and federal
agencies, such as the Department of Health, Pollution Control Agency, and watershed
districts are and will continue to require additional projects within the department. The
department also struggles with inspecting the increase number of utility connections within
the right -of -ways due to home additions, tear down & rebuilds, and other utilities such as gas,
electric, and communications. Staff is requesting to hire a lower level engineer to coordinate
and inspect some of the construction projects that is currently being coordinated by the
Assistant City Engineer. The department has also looked at a redistribution of the workload
to help produce the projects in a timely manner.
City of Edina
MEMORANDUM
TO: Gordon Hughes, City Manager
John Wallin, Finance Director
FROM: Steve A. Kirchman, Chief Building Official v CA- k
DATE: June 2, 2006
SUBJECT: 2007 Budget, preliminary assumptions
Revenue. Revenue through the end on May 2006 is $815,089 compared to $978,000 at the same time last
year. Predicted 2006 revenue, based on past percentage of annual revenue through May and projects
currently under review, is $2,145,971. This is $285,971 greater than the adopted 2006 revenue of
$1,860,000.
Major construction projects for 2007 will include continuing significant hospital remodeling, construction
of the Westin Edina Galleria, demolition of the existing Target with construction of a Super Target. The
District, which includes a high rise condominium building, restaurants and a strip center has been approved
-by council and may start construction in summer 2006. Permitting and construction of the District would
continue through 2007. At this early stage, I predict 2007 revenue at $1,850,000.
2006 Expenditures. Temporary employee salaries (1495 -6013) and Social Security expenditures (1495-
6034) will exceed 2006 budgeted expenses by about $50,000 as a result of part-time inspectors' salaries.
General Supplies (1495 -6406) will also exceed 2006 budgeted expense due to cost of equipping part-time
inspectors.
2007 Expenditures.
❖ 1495 -6103, Professional Services. The 2006 Professional Services budget is $41,000. Professional
Services includes inspections and plan review services from Inspectron and OCE printer maintenance
costs. The high level of construction activity has necessitated and will continue to necessitate
utilization of Inspectron services to maintain acceptable inspection lead times and permit review time.
The OCE printer is used by the Inspections Department, the Engineering Department and the Planning
Department. Annual OCE maintenance and supply costs of $4,000 should be shifted from account
1495 -6103 to City Hall Central Services account with the costs distributed to all users. This will reduce
1495 -6103 to $37,000.
❖ 1495 -6160, Data Processing. A need continues to exist for a more efficient effective method of
complaint management. There are currently no standardized forms or procedures among departments.
I've discussed development of complaint management with the Planning and Health Departments who
both agree with the need for and effective system to manage complaints. Development and/or
implementation of complaint management software has not been pursued in 2006 because a system may
be developed by LOGIS and City staff time hasn't been available to pursue solutions. Use of programs
developed by LOGIS will impact the 2007 Data Processing budget. Although I have no idea of costs at
this point, we should be able to provide cost estimates later in the 2007 budget process.
City Hall
4801 WEST 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394
www.cityofedina.com
952 - 927 -8861
FAX 952 - 826 -0390
TTY 952 - 826 -0379
.. r
2007 Preliminary Budget Assumptions
June 2, 2006
Page 2 of 2
❖ 1495 -6010 to 6045. Personnel Services.
Support Staff. Inadequate staffing in our reception area continues to be a problem. Inspections,
which are schedule by support staff, have increased over 37% since 2000. Permits, which are
issued by support staff, have increased by Over 10 %. Increased activity in the Inspection
Department precludes inspections staff from assisting support staff during breaks, vacations or
sickness. Tasks such as retrieving the mail, delivering daily revenue reports, postage stamping
mailed permits and even bathroom breaks result in the reception area being left unattended.
Telephone calls and customer visits continue to increase — with three lines coming. into the
department, calls regularly roll back to the operator and customers face 15 -20 minute waits in line.
Lack of adequate support staffing also deprives the department of the ability to deal with aged and
expired permits. 43% of all permits issued. in 2004 were not closed out; 45% did not receive final
inspections in 2005. Each open permit requires one to three letters to resolve — 2692 to 8076 letters
for open 2005 permits! It cannot be done with existing staff.
➢ Inspection Staff. I'm hopeful the recent addition of two part-time inspector /plan reviewer
positions will decrease our inspection and plan review time backlog. I hope to reduce overtime and
initiate issuance of siding permits. The two part-time positions are not budgeted. $91,000 should
be added to the Personnel Services budget to cover cost for two part-time employees — one at
$29.00 per hour for 24 hours per week and one at $30.00 per hour for 32 hours per week.
❖ 1495 -6103 to 6188, Contractual Services. Increased staffing both full -time and part-time have
increased continuing education and telephone costs. $1,200 should be added to the Contractual
Services budget to cover increased costs due to additional staff.
❖ 1495 -6405 to 6575, Commodities. Additional staffing will also increase general supply and uniform
needs. $750 should be added to the Commodities budget to cover increased costs due to additional
staff.
❖ 1495 -6710, Equipment. A full -time inspector was added in 2006, but the budget did not include a
vehicle. We've been using a series of used vehicles, but their reliability and future availability is
questionable. $15,000 should be added to the Equipment budget to provide a vehicle for the permanent,
full -time inspector added in 2006.
❖ Inflationary Increases. I assume all budget category may be increased by 3% to 5% due to inflation.
H:\m mos& rpts\admin\ Annua]Budpt\2007`07BdgtAsurrq)l
A;.
a
Memo
To: John Wallin, Finance Director
From: Mike Siitari, Police Chief -11kP
Date: June 1, 2006
Re: 2007 Budget Forecast
A review of crime trends, caseloads and calls for service leads to my request to
replace one detective position and add an additional police officer for 2007.
Although crime rates remained stable in 2005 the demands placed upon the Police .
Department have increased substantially over the last several years. Edina and
metro area crime trends in 2006 indicate that we had reached a low point and the
crime rate is now rising. If we continue with the status quo in staffing levels we will
not be able to provide adequate service levels and run the risk of a double digit crime
rate increase. The two positions I am requesting are as follows:
Detective
The rapid rise in financial and Internet crimes has resulted in a corresponding rise in
the number of cases assigned to our detectives. The complexity of investigations
has increased the amount of time necessary to properly investigate each case.
Internet provider search warrants, cell phone tracking, eBay searches and vulnerable
adult investigations are now common procedures that were unheard of a few years
ago. Improvements in evidence analysis (DNA, handwriting analysis) and computer
forensics have also increased the number of cases assigned to the detectives. 434
cases were assigned for investigation in 2003. 725 cases were assigned in 2005, a
67% increase in two years. This increase has resulted in a reduction in our ability to
properly investigate cases and provide quality service to crime victims. We have
taken steps to reduce the caseload, such as using a "bad check" diversion program
and a more restrictive use of solvability factors when assigning cases, but the.
existing staff cannot meet the demands being placed upon them.
We have assigned a full -time detective to the Minnesota Financial Crimes Task
Force ( MFCTF) since 2003. We receive $93,000 per year for reimbursement of
salary, benefits and a vehicle. Instead of replacing that position we have used the
reimbursement to balance the budget. If we are not allowed to replace the position
in 2007 we need to withdraw from the MFCTF and assign the detective an Edina
• Page 1
caseload. This does not appear to be a desirable option since we lose the expertise
and assistance of the Task Force, in addition to the reimbursement funds. Identity
theft and financial crimes are wide scale problems that need to be addressed on a
statewide basis. The MFCTF allows us to participate in a statewide effort at a
minimal cost. Our top budget priority is to replace this detective position.
New officer salary/benefits (30 %) /detective pay = $63,187 (offset by $93,000 grant)
Commercial Area Officer
When we assigned a detective to the MFCTF, we backfilled that slot in the
Investigative Division by reassigning an officer from the flex team who had been
working the plainclothes detail assigned to the Southdale area. Since we, have joined
the MFCTF we have had one officer assigned to Southdale Center. The southeast
quadrant accounts for 40 %. of our calls for service. The bustling retail area is a
magnet for a significant portion of our criminal activity, e.g. shoplifting, thefts from
auto and credit card fraud. We have seen an increase in gang related activity this
year along with thefts and fraud. The lone plainclothes officer cannot handle the
expanding caseload. A second officer allow a more proactive approach that will
help address and deter crime in the area.
The Southdale area is going through major changes with the addition of the two high-
rise complexes. We need to stay on top of crime and safety issues in order to
preserve the area's reputation as a premier place to live and work. We have looked
at shifting existing resources but this would create problems elsewhere due to the
rising call load and style of policing we have transitioned to in the last five years. We
have asked our officers to take ownership of problem locations and to look for long-
term solutions instead of the quick fix mentality used in the past. This has resulted in
more time spent on calls per officer and less nondemand time available for proactive
patrol activity. Our citation totals have dropped over the last five years, due in large
part to the time officers now devote to initial investigation and follow up on calls for
service. Special needs populations, such as those who speak English as a second
language (or not at all) and emotionally disturbed people, have increased significantly
and placed greater demands on the officers' time. An additional commercial area
officer would allow us to allocate an additional resource in our busiest sector.
New officer/benefits = $58,987
Contractual Services /Commodities
A cost of living increase should cover projected needs for Contractual Services and
Commodities. We have been able to balance the large increases in some areas —
interpreter services, ammunition, and training — with increased efficiencies in other
areas. A large wild card is the annual costs for the service contract for the new
computer system we will purchase later this year. The cost figures submitted by all
three vendors range from $26,000 to $41,000 greater than our present annual costs.
• Page 2
• w
I'
Depending on the final award of contract and the installation schedule, the higher
costs could start in 2007 or 2008. We feel we have sufficient funds to cover 2007.
Equipment Replacement
The Equipment Replacement account will be spent down rapidly in 2006 —2007 with
the acquisition of a new Computer Aided Dispatch and Records Management
System (CAD /RMS) and other scheduled replacement purchases. The initial outlay
for the CAD /RMS hardware /software will be approximately $500,000. Adding GPS
and AVL modules would increase that total by approximately $50,000. We have
reached the negotiation stage with the final vendors and hope to award a contract by
the end of July.
The largest replacement purchase in 2007 will be vehicles. We have projected a
replacement cost of $170,772 next year. A second significant replacement cost area
is computer equipment. This is separate from the CAD /RMS system that is the
servers and software to run the department network and interfaces. We are
scheduled to replace desktop computers and printers throughout the office and in the
Communications Center. Projected replacement costs in 2007 are $131,616. We
are researching how much of the Communication Center equipment can be covered
by 911 fund reserves. State statute mandates what the 911 funds can be used for.
A summary sheet of our equipment replacement schedule on a long -term basis is
attached.
Animal Control and Civil Defense
No major changes in either category. Cost of living increases are the only projected
changes.
CIP
A Computerized Emergency Medical Dispatch system has $30,000 allocated in
2006. This will be part of the CAD /RMS purchase. This replaces the card and
Rolodex system currently used with a computer program interfaced with the dispatch
software. Speed and accuracy will be improved on medical emergency instructions.
We have $50,000 allocated in 2007 for an In -squad video system. These systems
are becoming the standard for many departments throughout the state. They do
provide invaluable documentation for court purposes or complaint investigations.
We had targeted 2007 as the year for purchase on the forecast that digital
technology would be the standard, replacing the cumbersome VHS equipment most
departments initially installed. Digital technology has become readily available but
the costs may decease if we wait one year to make the purchase. A potential
drawback to waiting is that a high -risk event would not be recorded due to the delay
for cost purposes.
• Page 3
Updated 4/7106
EQUIPMENT
COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
FIREARMS
OFFICER PROTECTION EQUIPMENT
SQUAD EQUIPMENT
PUBLIC SAFETY COMUNICATIONS
ERT TACTICAL EQUIPMENT
AUDIO VISUAL EQUIPMENT
TELEVISION EQUIPMENT
CIVIL DEFENSE (Did not update)
FACILITY EQUIPMENT
MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
VEHICLE INVENTORY
TOTALS
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
FUTURE
BUDGET
BUDGET
BUDGET
BUDGET
BUDGET
BUDGET
BUDGET
TOTALS
277,249
131,616
0
10,654
0
0
0
419,518
23,760
6,050
8,038
0
11,428
4,550
28,280
82,106
0
0
1,704
4,260
9,372
1,704
7,290
24,330
29,560
0
12,010
0
6,680
8,000
19,134
75,384
38,600
0
1,050
200
0
588,385
1,256,142
1,884,377
1,300
300
0
3,400
0
0
35,895
40,895
13,564
0
0
0
6,810
0
10,528
30,902
350
0
0
0
150
0
3,491
3,991
4,014
0
0
0
0
43,000
1,000
48,014
5,800
0
0
0
0
2,700
23,699
32,199
33,513
4,352
0
17,100
14,516
0
0
69,481
138,348
151,285
170,772
144,500
119,431
0
98,000
822,336
566,058
293,603
193,574
180,114
168,387
648,339
1,483,459
3,533,533 3,533,533
Items purchased 2006 - Equip Real
Firearms: $23,760
Vehicles: K92 $30,231
(4) Crown Vies $99,024
(1) 2005 Tahoe $27,079
Squad Equip: (2) Pro Laser III $6313
Computer: IBM Server $1132
Autio Visual: 20 Digital Recorders DS -3300 $5000
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: GORDON HU , JOHN WALLIN, AND ERIC ROGGEMAN.
FROM: JOHN KEPRI S
CC:. VINCE COC , ED MACHOLDA, DONNA TILSNER, AND SUSIE
MILLER.
SUBJECT: 2007 BUDGET ASSUMPTIONS.
DATE: MAY 26, 2006
For the 2007 budget assumptions process, I am recommending a no net gain from the 2006 Park and
Recreation Department Budget other than the standard percentage increases in commodities,
contractual services, personal services, and equipment replacement. To accomplish that goal, I am
recommending that the Park and Recreation Administration Contractual Services budget
(1600.6103) be reduced by $19,000 and that the Park and Recreation Maintenance Paths and Hard
Surfaces budget (1647.6103) be increased by $19,000 for 2007.
The City Council approved a $19,000 increase in the Park and Recreation Administration
Professional Services budget for 2006 to fund a community -wide Needs Assessment Survey. Those
funds will not be needed in 2007 in that particular line item budget.
PATHS AND HARD SURFACES BUDGET
Last year, I requested a $40,000 increase in the Paths and Hard Surfaces 2006 budget. The City
Council approved half of that request, $20,000. This continues to be an under- funded account that
is needed to maintain all hard surface paths, courts, and parking lots. If these critical routine hard
surface maintenance needs are not addressed in a timely manner, the problem will escalate to a
significantly more expensive problem that will require complete removal and rebuild of these hard
surface areas. This line item budget is also called upon to pay for purchase and replacement of
picnic tables, bleachers, park benches, fencing, field lighting, tables, chairs, signs, drinking
fountains, and playground equipment repairs. We continue to fall behind in this area of
maintenance and equipment replacement and we continue to hear the complaints from our
customers.
Over 1,000 lineal feet of pathway repair is being done on the asphalt trails at Bredesen Park in
2006. The repairs are about half of the needed repairs; however, current funding levels do not
permit us to complete the job. There are other equally critical hard surface areas in desperate need
of repair, such as, tennis courts, basketball courts, parking lots, and hard surface pathways.
As of January 1, 2005, all pieces of equipment valued less than $2,500 are no longer funded through
the Equipment Replacement Budget. The Park and Recreation Department has a significant amount
of light equipment that requires replacement on an annual basis. Equipment includes smaller park
-1
JP
amenities and working tools, such as, picnic tables, park benches, chain saws, weed whips, and push
lawn mowers. This is also the fund that pays for fencing additions and repairs, such as the new
fencing for the new off -leash dog area.
PARK MAINTENANCE WORKER POSITION
As you may recall, last year I requested that we fill the Park Maintenance position vacancy that has
not been reinstated since John Crawford's retirement in 2003. The request was denied. This year I
am not making the same request; however, I do so under the assumption that we may continue to
employ former full -time professional park maintenance workers on a seasonal basis to perform
heavy equipment duties during the summer months. They require a higher hourly wage (with no
benefits); however, they permit us to get large mowing duties without having to add full -time year
around employees.
I also am holding off on the request to reinstate this full -time position based on the premise that we
will not be directed to increase the, level of forestry maintenance or weed control. A change to the
Turf Management Policy in place or a directive to increase the level of buckthorn control would
require more personnel. The same concern holds true if the Park Board and City Council direct
staff to maintain more outdoor hockey rinks. hi other words, our professional staff workload is at
capacity and at times arguably beyond capacity. Any additional maintenance expectations would
result in something else being compromised.
-2
1�
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: JOHN WALLIN, FINANCE DIRECTOR
CC: ERIC ROGGEMAN, ASST. FINANCE DIRECTOR
FROM: HEATHER WORTHINGTON, ASST. CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: 2007 BUDGET ASSUMPTIONS BY AREA
DATE: 6/5/2006
CC: GORDON HUGHES, CITY MANAGER; CEIL SMITH, ASST. TO THE CITY MANAGER
1100 Mayor and Council: Ceil Smith is coordinating a council salary study at this time, and may bring
forward suggestions for this area at a later date.
6104 Continuing Education: Increase $2,000
6106 Meeting Expense: Increase $2,000
Add: 6103 Professional Services: $5,000
1120 Administration: We are not anticipating major changes within the budget this year; however, we
do have several areas where we would like to make small increases to specific line items:
6103 Professional Services: Increase $3,000
6104 Continuing Education: Increase $2,000
6107 Mileage: Increase to federal reimbursement amount per mile
(IT costs submitted by Patty Latham directly)
1140 Planning: We anticipate that there may be additional changes, but at this point, we want to include
a placeholder for the 2007 Comprehensive Plan process:
6103 Professional Services: Add $30,000
1180 Elections: Please see Deb Mangen's memo which is attached.
1195 Legal and Court Services: Please note these changes for 2007:
6103 Professional Services: $185,000
6131 Professional Services — Legal: $103,000
6170 Court Charges: $15,000
6225 Board and Room Prisoner: $35,000
1513 Employee Programs:
6203 Clothing Allowance: Add $10 per employee
Add- 6103 Professional Services: $5,000 (Wellness Program)
Memorandum
To: John Wallin, Finance Director; Gordon Hughes, City Manager
From: Bob Wilson, City Assessor
Date: 06/02/2006
Re: 2007 Budget Assumptions
Contractual Services
Hennepin County has contracted with Pictometry International to create an Image
Library of all parcels within the County. I have attached a memo describing the
images and the accompanying software. Hennepin County has paid for these costs
upfront and is willing to share the digital oblique images as well as the costs with
each city.
Based on the number of parcels in Edina, the cost would be approximately $5,200.
They are scheduled to re -fly the county every two years and the fee is based on the
flight schedule
Hennepin County was flown this spring and we anticipate the images and the first
bill to arrive this fall.
I believe a number of departments in the city would benefit from this technology,
including police, fire, planning, engineering, inspections and assessing.
I do not foresee any other changes in my 2007 budget, other than inflationary
adjustments.,
Hennepin County Taxpayer Services Department
GIS Division - Suite A -2380 612.596.9484 Phone
Hennepin County Government Center 612.348.7423 Fax
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487 www.hennepin.us
IMay 17, 2006
To: Municipality Managers /Administrators
City Assessors
Police Chiefs
From: Hennepin County GIS Division
As you may already know, last month Hennepin County contracted with Pictometry International
Corporation for the Pictometry Electronic Field Study Image Library and Software.
Pictometry has created 'a Hennepin county Library of digital, full -color aerial imagery and
geospatial information. The imagery includes oblique images, capturing every square foot of the
county from as many as 12 directions, with pixel resolutions ranging one -and one -half feet to six
inches. The unique oblique images reveal the front, back and sides of objects of interest rather
than just the top, as with ortho images.
The Image Library will be delivered with Pictometry's software tool — Electronic Field Study
(EFS). EFS will permit users to locate images by searching either a specific address or
geographic coordinate. Users will be able to measure distance, area, or height; determine an
elevation from sea level; and annotate directly upon the images.
Our contract allows us to share Pictometry and associated costs with municipalities in Hennepin
County. The images and software will be available for distribution to municipalities in late
summer /early fall of 2006.
• Each municipality can have access to an Image Library that contains their geography as
defined by parcel boundaries (plus a one -mile radius around the municipality boundary).
• For the municipalities interested in using Pictometry, Hennepin County will provide
Image Library setup and EFS training for up to two users.
• The municipalities will share in the cost of Pictometry by paying $.25 per parcel or
$1,000 - whichever is greater.
More information regarding Pictometry can be found at their website: ww'Vv.Pictometry.coin . If
you are interested in this opportunity and would like more details please feel free to contact me.
Scott Simmer
Hennepin County GIS Coordinator
scott.simmer@co.hennepin.mn.us
Pa cc, (S.
n Equal .ycJ2d Paper
City of Edina
Equipment Inventory Listing
Assessing
Present Life
Purchase Purchase Replacement In Replace Annual
Equipment Year Price Unit Price Years Year Need
ROLLING STOCK:
Unit # Year Description
22.112
2005
Ford Taurus
22.111
1998
Ford Taurus
22.136
1999
Ford Crown Vic
c
2005
Ford Taurus
Greg (306)
2005
Moreau
City of Edina
Equipment Inventory Listing
Assessing
Present Life
Purchase Purchase Replacement In Replace Annual
Equipment Year Price Unit Price Years Year Need
ROLLING STOCK:
Unit # Year Description
22.112
2005
Ford Taurus
22.111
1998
Ford Taurus
22.136
1999
Ford Crown Vic
22.113
2005
Ford Taurus
Greg (306)
2005
Moreau
1999
Rolling Stock
Total
OFFICE EQUIPMENT:
Bev
2005
$
11,947
$ 15,000
7
2012
Diane
1998
$
14,419
$ 15,000
7
2005
Moreau
1999
$
20,686
$ 15,000
7
•2006
Rick
2005
$
11,947
$ 15,000
7
2012
Compaq PC
Bob W L I
Compaq PC
Rick N L 1
Compaq PC
Diane L1
Compaq PC
Beverly L1
Compaq PC
Liz L 1
Compaq PC
Mitzi L
Compaq PC.
_ Moreau L1
Compaq PC
Intern Ll
BP Laser ect
8150 DN Printer
BP Lasegect
6MP Printer
Public Use PC
(1) LI
Total Computer Equipment
ASSESSING TOTALS
Other office Equipment
$ 58,999 $ 60,000
2004
$
1,255.64
$
1,300
4
2008
2004
$
1,255.64
$
1,300
4
2008
2004
$
1,255.64
$
1,300
4
2008
2004
$
1,255.64
$
1,300
4
2008
2004
$
1,255.64
$
1,300
4
2008
2004
$
1,255.64
$
1,300
4
2008
2004
$
1,255.64
$
1,300
4
2008
-
$-
1,300
4
2008
2000
$
1,569.81
$
3,000
4
2004
1998
$
781.71
$
650
4
2002
2000
$
2,000.00
$
1,300
4
2004
$ 13,141.00 $ 15,350
$ 72,140.00 $ 75,350
Palm Pilot
1999
$
319.62
Epson Digital Camera
1999
$
570.76
Olympus C7070 Camera
2005
$
682.56
Olympus C -740 Camera
2004
$
513.72
Shredder
2004
$
240.00
$ 2,143
$ 2,143
$ 2,143
$ 2,429
$ 8,858
325.00
325.00
325.00
325.00
325.00
325.00
325.00
325.00
750.00
162.50
325.00
$ 3,838
12,695
2005 Equipment Replacement Carryover $ 41,972.00
2006 Budget $ 12,695.00
2006 Expenses $
2006 End Balance $ 54,667.00
(Shortage)Excess over Need $ 54,667.00
AGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
JUNE 20, 2006
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the
Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All
agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are
considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion
of such items unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it. In such cases
the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on
the Agenda.
* I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of June 6, 2006
II. ADTOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of June 6, 2006
II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Zoning
Ordinances: First Reading requires affirmative rollcall votes of three Council members
except that a rezoning from residential to non - residential requires four affirmative
votes. Second Reading requires affirmative rollcall votes of three of Council to pass
except rezoning from residential to non - residential requires four affirmative votes.
Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall votes of four members of Council to
pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Properly Zoned Planned District:
Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council members required passing. Conditional Use
Permit: Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council members required to pass. Variance
Appeal: Favorable rollcall of Council Members present to uphold or deny appeal
Rollcall A. PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL OF DENIAL OF VARIANCE - Robert Miller, 4622
Drexel Avenue
III. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
IV. AWARD OF BID
A. Insurance Renewals:
1. Workers Compensation
2. General Liability
3. Property
Agenda /Edina City Council
June 20, 2006
Page 2
B. WTP #4 Chemical Room Expansion Roofing System - Utility Department
C. Ventilation System for Expansion of Water Treatment Plant No. 4 - Utility
Department
D. 2006 Alley Projects & Stauder Circle, Contract No. ENG 06 -7, Imp. Nos. A -210,
STS -325, A -211, A -223, STS -324 & STS -263
E. Steel Detail/Design 2 Change Orders Camelot Metals, Inc. - Gymnasium
Construction
F. Approve Annual Microsoft State Enterprise Agreement
V. REPORTS/ RECOMMENDATIONS
A. PUBLIC HEARING - Edina Youth Sports Task Force
B. Resolution Accepting Various Donations
C. Community Education Services Board and Community Health Committee
Appointments
D. Traffic Safety Staff Report for June 8, 2006
VI. FINANCE
A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per Pre -List dated June 7,
2006, TOTAL $394,142.83; June 13, 2006, TOTAL $1,378,244.92.
VII. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS
VIII. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
IX. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
X. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEM
Tues
July 4
Wed
July 5
Tues
July 18
Tues
Aug 1
Tues
Aug 15
Tues
Aug 29
Mon
Sept 4
Tues
Sept 5
Tues
Sept 12
Tues
Sept. 12
Tues
Sept 19
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
INDEPENDENCE DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Offices Closed - Edina Parade Begins 10:00 A.M.
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMB'
Filing Opens - City Council Offices
8:00 A.M.
CM CLERK'S OFF.
LABOR DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Offices Closed
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
FILING CLOSES City Council Office
5:00 P.M.
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
PRIMARY ELECTION DAY - Polls Open From 7:00
A.M. until 8:00 P.M.
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MINUTES
OF THE
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
HELD AT CITY HALL
JUNE 6, 2006,
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson and
Chair Hovland.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion
seconded by Commissioner Masica approving the
Housing and Redevelopment Authority as presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
made by Commissioner Swenson and
Consent Agenda for the East Edina
*MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR MAY 16, 2006, APPROVED Motion made by
Commissioner Swenson and seconded by Commissioner Masica approving the Minutes of
the Regular Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for May 16, 2006,
as presented.
Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes.
There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda,
Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned.
Executive Director
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT CITY HALL
JUNE 6, 2006
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson and Mayor
Hovland.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Swenson and
seconded by Member Masica approving the Council Consent Agenda as presented with
the exception of Agenda Item I. Regular Meeting Minutes of May 16, 2006, Agenda Item
V.I., Ratify School District Appointment to Human Rights & Relations Commission and
Agenda Item VII.B., Receive Petition Requesting Sound Wall - West Side of TH 100
between Vernon Avenue and Minnehaha Creek.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETINGS OF MAY 16, 2006, MAY 24, 2006, AND MAY 30,
2006, APPROVED Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Masica
approving the Special Meeting Minutes of May 16, 2006, May 24, 2006, and May 30, 2006,
as presented.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 16, 2006, APPROVED AS AMENDED
Member Masica asked removal of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of May 16, 2006, from
the Consent Agenda for an amendment.
Member Masica made a motion approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the
Edina City Council for May 16, 2006, as amended. Member Swenson seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -66 FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMENDATION TO RESIDENTS
PRESENTED Mayor Hovland presented Certificates of Commendation to Andrey Nikiforov
and Ilia Nikiforov for their quick response and action in saving the life of another Edina
resident.
Member Masica made a motion approving the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-66
OF COMMENDATION
WHEREAS, on the evening of April 14, 2006, at 7201 York Avenue, an Edina
citizen had been in the pool and accidentally slipped into the deep end of the pool.
The victim was not able to swim and was unable to stay above the water. Andrey
Page 1
Minutes/Edina City Council/lune 6, 2006
V
and Ilia Nikiforov were asked by friends of the victim to help rescue him from the
bottom of the pool. Andrey and Ilia Nikiforov immediately and heroically jumped
in the pool and rescued the victim from the pool bottom. They began CPR and
clearly saved the life of the citizen. When the Edina Police and
Paramedic,/Firefighters arrived, the victim was breathing on his own and is now
completely recovered from the incident.
WHEREAS, without the immediate unselfish action and heroics of Andrey
Nikiforov and Ilia Nikiforov, the victim would have drowned.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council, Fire
and Police Departments and all Edina residents hereby express thanks and
commend Andrey Nikiforov and Ilia Nikiforov for their quick response and action
in saving the life of another Edina citizen
Dated this 6th day of June, 2006. Member Housh seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
POLICE CANINE OFFICER AND CANINE 'DIESEL' INTRODUCED Mayor Hovland
introduced Edina Canine Officer Mike Seeger and his canine companion "Diesel ". Chief
Siitari said Diesel was the second canine at the City of Edina and came from Slovakia.
Donations received from various sources as well as the Edina Federated Women and the
Pohlad Foundation made Diesel's presence possible. Chief Siitari said that Mike Seeger is the
dog's trainer and handler and Diesel will be involved with tracking, searching, apprehension
and narcotics detection and making Edina a safer place.
*RESOLUTION NO 2006 -65 LOT DIVISION APPROVED - 5710/5714 HANSEN ROAD
Member Swenson introduced the following resolution, seconded by Member Masica, and
moved its approval:
RESOLUTION NO, 2006 -65
LOT DIVISION
5710/5714 HANSEN ROAD
WHEREAS, the following described tract of land, the north 135 feet of the South 399 feet
of Lot 6 in GARDEN PARK, Hennepin County, Minnesota, (described area in 00,000 sq.
ft.)
PARCEL A:
That part of the north 71.08 feet of the South 399 feet of Lot 6 in GARDEN PARK,
Hennepin County, Minnesota (described area is 00,000 sq. ft.)
PARCEL B:
That part of the north 135 feet of the South 399 feet of Lot 6, in GARDEN PARK, Hennepin
County, Minnesota (described area is 00,000 sq. ft.)
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning
Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as
separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning
Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Code Sections 810 and 850.
Page 2
W
Minutes/Edina City Council/Tune 6, 2006
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the
conveyance and ownership of the second above described Parcels as separate tracts of land
is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Code Sections 850 and 810 are
hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land, but
only to the extent permitted under Code section 810 and Code Section 850 and subject to
the limitations set out in Code Section 850 and said ordinances are not waived for any
other purpose or as to any other provisions thereof, and further subject, however, to the
provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance
with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this
Council as may be provided for by those ordinances.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*RESOLUTION NO 2006 -67 HEARING DATE SET OF TUNE 20, 2006, AND 60 DAY
EXTENSION FROM ACTION GRANTED FOR APPEAL OF VARIANCE DENIAL - 4622
DREXEL AVENUE Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Masica
introducing the following resolution and moving it adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-67
SETTING HEARING DATE OF JUNE 20, 2006, AND
GRANTING 60 DAY EXTENSION FROM ACTION
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDINA CITY COUNCOUNCIL setting June 20, 2006 as the
hearing date for the appeal on the variance denial for 4622 Drexel Avenue.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL that an extension from
action is hereby granted on the Variance submitted by Robert Miller until August 17, 2006.
Adopted this 61h day of June, 2006.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS: Members of the "Friends of the Nature Center" introduced
themselves, Jean White, 5290 Villa Way, Tim Cregan, 6704 Point Drive, Jude Olson, 5516
Dundee Road, and Brian Pella, 1430 County Road 92, Independence, MN. Jeanne Hanson,
6708 Cornelia Drive introduced Karen Schrag, Director of the Woodlake Nature Center.
Ms. Hanson, Ms. White, Mr. Cregan and Mr. Pella, "Friends of the Nature Center" members
informed the Council via a Power Point Presentation about the proposal as follows:
Edina Nature Center:
• Mission Statement: to provide Edina residents of all ages with a Nature Center in a
healthful natural setting where they can learn about and enjoy local natural
envirorunent - a gathering place that will enhance the future of the whole
community.
• Focus: Open a Nature Center with programs, classes, exhibits, and meeting spaces
analogous to those at the Edina Art Center and Edina History center.
• Location: Bredesen Park, in a "green building ".
Audiences to be served:
School age children, 18.8% of Edina; School age kids and their families - c. 25% of Edina;
Adults, age 20 - 64, 53% of Edina; Seniors (over 65), 22.7% of Edina; Preschool age
children, 5.4% of Edina
Community Value of a Nature Center:
Page 3
Minutes/Edina City Council/Tune 6, 2006
Deepens pride in our shared resources; Enhances understanding of the natural world;
Demonstrates interaction of citizens and nature (e.g. flood control); Provides
education /exercise /entertainment /service opportunities for all citizens; Helps to
maintain high property values; Adds a joyful gathering place to Edina
Community Fit:
Not Duplicative; Unique Edina Offerings, e.g. organic wine and cattail canap6 event;
mystery story - writing night for teens; adult nature poetry workshop; daytime astronomy;
anatomy of a creek
Other City Nature Centers:
Woodlake Nature Center/ Richfield; Westwood Hills Nature Center /St. Louis Park;
Springbrook Nature Center /Fridley; Maplewood Nature Center/ Maplewood; Harriet
Alexander Nature Center/ Roseville
The Nature Center's Exhibits, Examples:
Maps of Nine Mile' Creek and Minnehaha Creek from their sources to Mississippi and
Minnesota Rivers; Tapes of local bird songs; Winning images from a photography contest;
Loans from Bell Museum, such as birds'nests; Microscope images of algae, water beetles
The Nature Center's Programs and Classes, Examples:
Nightfall bird watching, by wheelchair; Fun challenges for teens: Paddling 10 Edina
ponds all next Saturday; Building a rain garden; Snow shoeing; "Celebrating' the carp;
Observing the moon with binoculars
The Nature Center's Performances /Events /Examples:
Nature choreography/ dance; Honey harvest from hives; Seniors sharing about what
Edina used to look like; Weddings, birthday parties, small corporate retreats; Service
projects by high school students
Advantages of Bredesen Park Site:
City owned; Parking lot in place; Plumbing in place; Perimeter trail and inner trail
systems in place; Natural setting, open water, wetlands, oak savanna look - alike; Part of
Nine Mile Creek Watershed District; Several sites are high/ dry to meet Watershed
District regulations; Bridge may connect Bredesen and natural areas at EHS and Creek
Valley
Proposed "Green Building ":
Green architecture; Building at 4000 sf adequate for expansion; Two /three small shelters
further into park; Landscaping with native plants; Environmental art inside and out
Design/ Materials of "Green Buildings':
Exteriors could be local wood, recycled glass, natural turf, solar panels, wastewater
recycled, clivus toilets, permeable pavers, roofs, salvaged or certified lumber, geothermal,
waste wood beams, soybean hull countertops, biodegradable linoleum floors, sun -
tracking skylights, etc.
Proposed "Green Buildings" Utilities:
Estimated 35% reduction in energy costs over same sized buildings after initial
investment is made
Proposed "Green Buildings" Overall Costs:
Flatpak House proposed at $175/$299/sf; Glidehouse proposed at $200 /sf; Architect
designed pre -fabs run $200/ $350 / sf
Construction Costs:
Page 4
I
Minutes/Edina Citv Council/iune 6, 2006
Estimated cost: $1 million; $250,000 / two or three small shelters; $40,000 initial green
landscaping; $50,000/ scientific equipment and programming; and $30,000 for
fixtures/ furniture; TOTAL $1,360.00.
Operating Budget/ Expenses:
Proposed Annual Operating Budget at $413,000
Operating Budget /Income:
$48,000, including memberships, rental of facility, tuition from classes/ programs.
Funding:
Donations /Gifts accepted via Edina Foundation; Secure financing through schools, adult
education and watershed district
Ms. Hanson concluded the benefit to Edina of a Nature Center would be a resource for all
citizens, a place to gather, learn and experience nature at a full -time center. It would be an
excellent use of a section of Bredesen Park as well as an inspiration similar to the Edina Art
Center and Edina History Center. She indicated that the proposed project was worthy of the
City's support as well as support from private sources. Ms. Hanson shared her e-mail
address for contact ikhlitQaol.com.
Eric Brofein, 11550 Oberland Road, Minnetonka, said he was an environmental science
teacher at Edina High School as well as certified in chemistry, biology and life science. He
elaborated about projects that have been completed by students, and said the proposed
center would be a huge benefit to the City and to teachers setting up field trips.
Following a Co discmsiori,- A4ember - Swenson made -a- motion accepting the report as
presented and suggested the proposal be a part of the Park and Recreation Department
needs assessment survey scheduled for distribution to random residents in September
following the Council's approval of the assessment. Member Masica seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
Mark Simmons, 5517 Bedford Avenue, did not appear to speak. Manager Hughes informed
the Council that Sanitarian Engelman will continue to follow the progress of Mr. Simmons
concerns.
*AWARD OF BID FOR MILL AND OVERLAY IMPROVEMENT PROTECT -
CONTRACT NO. ENG 06 -04 Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by
Member Masica for award of bid for mill and overlay improvement project, Contract No.
Eng. 06 -04 to recommended low bidder, Bituminous Roadways, Inc., at $584,767.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*AWARD OF BID FOR VIDEO STREAMING Motion made by Member Swenson and
seconded by Member Masica for award of bid for Video Streaming to recommended low
bidder, Granicus at $13,447.50.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -61 ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland
explained in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted
by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations.
Page 5
Minutes/Edina City Council/lune 6, 2006
1
Member Swenson made a motion approving the following resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-61
ACCEPTING DONATIONS
ON BEHALF OF THE
CITY OF EDINA
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of
real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens;
WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council
adopted by a two thirds majority of its members.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with
sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens.
Donations to the Edina Senior Center as follows:
Edina Community Foundation $827.65 Senior Center Volunteer Recognition
Edina Community Foundation $158.90 Painting Supplies for Fireside Room Mural
Mary Hertogs $300.00 Water Color Painting in memory of Maureen
Malinosky
Donations to the Edina Art Center as follows:
Janet Palmer $ 50 Art books
Barbara Bindgen $500
Susan Sheets $ 30
Cassandra and Mark Litman $ 20
Colleagues of Calligraphy $100
--Dolores Dege $10
Ken Rosland $10
Judy Babcock $ 75 Decorative tiles
William Rickman $ 50 Art supplies
Dated: June 6, 2006
Member Masica seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
RATIFY SCHOOL DISTRICT APPOINTMENT TO HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS
COMMISSION Member Masica asked that the Appointment to the Human Rights &
Relations Commission by the Edina School District be removed from the Consent Agenda for
further information. Upon reading that six appointments to the Commission were from the
School District and six were appointed by the Council she asked for background. Mr. Hughes
said when the Commission was formed the focus was more on human relations. Member.
Masica questioned whether the School District contributes to the Commissions budget. Mr.
Hughes responded the School District makes no contribution to the commissioner's budget.
Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Swenson ratifying the Edina
School Board Appointment of Emery Erickson to serve on the Human Rights & Relations
Commission filling an unexpired term ending January 31, 2007. Member Swenson
seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
Page 6
1
Minutes/Edina City Council/iune 6, 2006
*RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -62 APPROVING RECONVEYANCE OF TAX FORFEIT
PROPERTY TO THE STATE OF MINNESOTA - POINT DRIVE Member Swenson
introduced Resolution No. 2006 -62, seconded by Member Masica and moved adoption as
follows:
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-62
REQUESTING THE RECONVEYENCE OF
TAX FORFEIT PROPERTY TO THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
WHEREAS, the Village of Edina on June 11, 1971, received from the State of
Minnesota a tax forfeited property described as:
Commencing at the northeasterly corner of Lot 16, thence southwesterly along
easterly line of said lot to a point 149 feet northeasterly from southeasterly corner thereof;
thence at an angle to the right of 139 degrees, 42 minutes to the northerly line of said Lot
16, thence easterly along said north line to beginning, all in Lot 16, Block 1, SOUTHDALE
THIRD ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota,
(PID No. 30- 02824420025); and
WHEREAS, it has been determined by the Edina City Council that there are no
existing or pending special assessments on said parcel; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined by the Edina City Council that there is no
public purpose for the aforementioned parcel.
BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Edina, that the City Clerk be
authorized and directed to file, "Reconveyance of Forfeited Lands to the State of
Minnesota by A Governmental Subdivision," for the property described above.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the sale of the aforementioned property be
restricted to the adjacent property owners.
Adopted this 6th day of June, 2006.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-63 APPROVED AUTHORIZING AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF
ST LOUIS PARK - JOINT ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS Member Masica asked that the
Agreement with the City of St. Louis Park for joint Roadway Improvements be removed
from the Consent Agenda for further information. She inquired whether the watermain work
was a shared expense. Mr. Houle said on this particular project there was no watermain work
involved. This project involves mill and overlay and curb and gutter. Member Masica asked
which City is responsible for snowplowing in the area. Mr. Houle said it was a shared
responsibility. Member Masica questioned where the funds were from to pay for this
roadway improvement. Mr. Houle said funds were from reserve appropriations.
Member Masica introduced the following resolution, seconded by Member Housh, as
follows:
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-63
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF
AGREEMENT WITH
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
JOINT ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT
CITY PROJECT NO. 2005-10
Page 7
Minutes/Edina City Council/Tune 6, 2006
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park has proposed to resurface the border streets +
that include West 40th Street, Natchez Avenue, Morningside Road and Browndale Avenue
as part of their yearly pavement management program; and
WHEREAS, the estimated cost to the City of Edina to accomplish this resurfacing is
$50,126.63; and
WHEREAS, staff has reviewed the plans and estimated costs and recommends
approval of the agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Edina enter into an
agreement with the City of St. Louis Park for their offer of resurfacing the border streets
before mentioned.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that James B. Hovland, Mayor and Gordon Hughes,
Edina City Manager, are hereby authorized to execute such agreements and amendments
as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the City of Edina.
Dated: June 6, 2006.
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -64 APPROVING THE TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION LOWERING THE STATEWIDE RESIDENTIAL ROADWAY
SPEED LIMIT TO 25 MPH; AND APPROVING STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION
REGARDING THE 25 MPH RESIDENTIAL SPEED LIMIT Assistant Engineer Lillehaug
said the Transportation Commission at their March 16, 2006, meeting, asked staff to review
the City's Speed Limit Policy and prepare a report for consideration of a 25 MPH Speed Limit
Policy for residential areas. On April 20, 2006, staff recommended that the current Speed
Limit Policy of 30 MPH be maintained unless documented safety issues exist and a speed
study had been conducted by Mn/ DOT or the statewide limit was lowered to 25 MPH.
On May 18, 2006, the Transportation Commissioners voted to recommend to the Council
adoption of a resolution recommending a 25 MPH speed limit policy in residential areas.
Staff evaluated the current policy, including safety, cost, implementation strategy and
enforcement. Mr. Lillehaug stated that safety was the most important factor. He said the
more consistent something was the safer it was. Mr. Lillehaug added changing the
approximately 1100 speed limit signs on residential streets would be expensive and no funds
have been designated for this purpose. Mr. Lillehaug noted that a number of requests have
been received to lower the speed limit. Streets classified as collector or arterial could not be
posted lower than 30 MPH. Some roads were state aid roads where the City receives funding
for maintenance of the roads. Reclassifying the roads could affect the City's budget.
Staff recommended rather than adopting a 25 MPH Speed Limit Policy, they recommended a
City resolution calling for a statewide lowering of the urban, residential speed limit on local
roadways from 30 MPH to 25 MPH. He said if the state to lowered the speed limit statewide,
more cities would implement the 25 MPH speeds making more consistent speeds statewide.
Jean White, a member of the Transportation Commission summarized the discussion on this
issue at the May Transportation Commission meeting.
Page 8
Minutes/Edina City Council /tune 6, 2006
Member Hulbert questioned whether this issue could be used by the Transportation
Commission as an addition to their tool box to aid traffic calming. She further suggested not
making a decision until information was received from other cities about their speed policies.
Mr. Hughes said in summary, a motion could be adopted that would refer the issue back to
the Transportation Commission because they did not have a full complement of members
when the vote was taken and recommend their focus being on other cities who have
implemented a 25 MPH residential speed limit and what criteria they used for their decision.
He indicated another scenario would be to keep the issue at the Council level and direct staff
to find information from other cities and bring that information directly back to the Council.
Following a Council discussion, Member Swenson made a motion approving the following
resolution as follows:
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-64
RESOLUTION. OF SUPPORT FOR
STATEWIDE LOCAL, RESIDENTIAL ROADWAY
25 MPH SPEED LIMIT
WHEREAS, drivers traveling at high speeds are less aware of their surroundings
and have less time to notice and react to pedestrians and bicyclists; and
WHEREAS, relatively small increases in vehicle speed can greatly increase the
chances that a pedestrian will die in a vehicle -to- pedestrian crash; and .
WHEREAS, experts on street design say that 20 to 25 miles per hour is the maximum
-safe speed for residential streets; and
WHEREAS, the City of Edina supports ensuring speed limits maximize safety for
all roadway users including drivers, pedestrians and bicyclists; and
WHERAS, the City of Edina supports goals that do not unfairly raise the
expectations of our citizens with regard to the relative safety of the streets; and
WHEREAS, passage would result in a uniform statewide speed limit that would
create consistency with regard to the way similar streets are posted and speeds are
enforced in our communities.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS THEREBY RESOLVED that the City Council of the City
of Edina does hereby strongly support a statewide lowering of the speed limit from 30
miles per hour to 25 miles per hour on local, residential roadways.
Passed and adopted this 6th day of June, 2006. Member Housh seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Nays: Hulbert
Motion carried.
Member Masica made a motion approving staff's recommendation regarding the 25 MPH
residential speed limit as follows:
"The City of Edina's current City Speed Limits Traffic policy shall be maintained
with the basic minimum speed limit of 30 MPH. The City of Edina shall not
consider lowering the speed limit of a residential street unless documented safety
issues exist and a traffic speed study has been conducted by MrVDOT indicating
the speed should be lowered; or the statewide urban, local, residential speed limit
is lowered from 30 MPH to 25 MPH. The updated policy shall be the basis for the
City's speed limits traffic policy."
Page 9
Minutes/Edina City Council/Tune 6, 2006
Member Swenson seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Nays: Hulbert
Motion carried.
DATE SET FOR 2006 BRAEMAR INSPECTION TOUR Motion made by Member
Swenson and seconded by Member Masica setting July 11. 2006, as the 41st Annual
Braemar Inspection Tour.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Member Swenson made a motion and Member
Masica seconded the motion approving payment of the following claims as shown in
detail on the Check Register dated May 17, 2006, and consisting of 37 pages: General Fund
$172,479.65; Communications Fund $2,251.99; Working Capital Fund $40,649.05; Art Center
Fund $2,626.71; Golf Dome Fund $16,119.43; Aquatic Center Fund $10,437.39; Golf Course
Fund $38,647.81; Ice Arena Fund $32,324.68; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund
$21,782.91; Liquor Fund $181,228.16; Utility Fund $613,269.64; Storm Sewer Fund $2,567.03;
Recycling Fund $33,992.60, PSTF Agency Fund $13,670.36; TOTAL $1,182,047.41; and for
approval of payment of claims dated May 24, 2006; and consisting of 29 pages: General
Fund $106,010.19; Communications Fund $6,307.83; Working Capital Fund $32,502.26;
Construction Fund $23.11; Art Center Fund $8,875.08; Golf Dome Fund $41.52, Aquatic
Center Fund $575.79; Golf Course Fund $40,355.04, Ice Arena Fund $239.29;
Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $11,011.87, Liquor Fund $153,074.61; Utility Fund
$27,097.38; Storm Sewer Fund $1,759.16; PSTF Agency Fund $1,425.44; TOTAL $389,298.57;
and for approval of payment of claims dated May 31, 2006, and consisting of 33 pages:
General Fund $386,963.00, Communications Fund $3,578.14; Working Capital Fund
$11,721.93; Art Center Fund $8,118.20; Golf Dome Fund $1,114.63; Aquatic Center Fund
$1,993.01; Golf Course Fund $58,686.06; Ice Arena Fund $5,305.98; Edinborough/Centennial
Lakes Fund $19,031.75; Liquor Fund $154,759.07; Utility Fund $36,445.61; Storm Sewer
Fund $128.57; PSTF Agency Fund $675.16; TOTAL $688,521.11.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*PETITION RECEIVED REQUESTING SIDEWALK ON PARK TERRACE NEAR
MALIBU DRIVE Member Swenson made a motion accepting a petition requesting
sidewalk on Park Terrace near Malibu Drive and to refer the petition to the Engineering
Department for processing as to feasibility.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
PETITION RECEIVED REQUESTING SOUND WALL - WEST SIDE OF TH 100
BETWEEN VERNON AVENUE AND MINNEHAHA CREEK Mr. Hughes explained the
City received a petition circulated by Dennis L. Knuer, 4821 Westbrook Lane and signed by
thirty -one property owners on Edinbrook Lane, Westbrook Lane, West 48th Street, West 49th
Street and Millpond Place requesting a sound wall on the west side of Trunk Highway 100
between Vernon Avenue and Minnehaha Creek. He said the City's normal procedure was to
refer the petition to the Engineering Department for processing as to feasibility.
Page 10
Minutes/Edina City Council/iune 6, 2006
Mr. Hughes informed the Council the issue of the sound wall had been before the Council in
the past and normally would be referred to the Engineering Department for processing.
After the Engineering Department declared if the project was feasible, the issue would be
back before the Council.
Mayor Hovland asked for the number of affected properties. Mr. Houle noted that there were
45 - 50 potentially affected properties.
Member Housh recollected there were residents on both sides of the issue at the last public
hearing held on the sound wall.
Member Swenson, Member Hulbert and Mayor Hovland intimated. the normal process
should be followed and the petition submitted to the Engineering Department for processing
as to feasibility and cost.
Member Swenson made a motion accepting receipt of a petition circulated by Dennis
Knuer, 4821 Westbrook Lane, and signed by thirty-one property owners on Edinbrook
Lane, Westbrook Lane, West 48th Street, West 49th Street and Millpond Place requesting a
sound wall on the west side of TH 100 between Vernon and Minnehaha Creek and to refer
the petition to the Engineering Department for processing as to feasibility. Member Masica
seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES Following a discussion of whether a Public
Hearing should be held on the Edina Youth Sports Task Force, Member Housh made a
motion stating that a Public Hearing on the Edina Youth Sports Task Force be held on
June 20, 2006, at the regular Council Meeting. Member Hulbert seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the
meeting adjourned at 9:50 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Page 11
City Clerk
ii
too /le
rQJ
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: ,
Mayor & City Council
Agenda Item: II. A.
From:
Planning Department
Consent ❑
Kris Aaker, Assistant Planner
Information Only ❑
Date:
June 20, 2006
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
®
To Council
Subject:
Action: ®
Motion
Appeal of Denial of Variance
❑
Resolution
Robert Miller, 4622 Drexel Ave
❑
Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Recommendation:
Info /Background:
Robert Miller, owner of the property located at 4622 Drexel Ave., is appealing the
May 4, 2006, Zoning Board of Appeals denial of his driveway width variance application
to allow the removal and relocation of his existing driveway south of the home to access
a detached garage to be constructed in the rear yard. The Zoning Board of Appeals
heard driveway width variance requests for the property on April 6, 2006 and on May 4,
2006. Each was a separate application to the board. The first request was to allow an
11 1/2 ft driveway width and the second request was to allow a 10 1/2 ft driveway width
along the south side of the home. The ordinance requires a minimum width of 12 ft for
newly constructed driveways.
The property owner is hoping to in -fill the existing front loading garage with living
space, add onto the back of the home and construct a new detached garage in the rear
yard. All aspects of the plan conform to the ordinance requirements with the exception
of the driveway width. The first variance application was to allow a driveway width of
approximately 11 1/2 ft. The driveway would have extended up to the south lot line and
would have abutted the neighbor's driveway to the south. There were three members
present at the April 6, 2006, Zoning Board meeting. Two of the members voted to deny
and one of the members voted in favor of the request. Michael Fischer, one of the
Zoning Board members who voted against the proposal stated his "no" vote was
supportive of a driveway width variance. Mr. Fischer stated that he could support a
greater variance and a narrower driveway that would be more in- keeping with other
driveways in the neighborhood. The Zoning Board cannot act to allow a variance that is
greater than notified for so a re- application for a narrower driveway than proposed was
ti
required.
The property owner re- applied for a driveway width variance to allow a driveway
width of 10'/2 % The Zoning Board of Appeals heard the homeowners request for a 1 '/2
ft driveway width variance that would allow for a 10 1/2 ft wide driveway with an 18 inch
planting strip along the south side of the new driveway on May 4, 2006. There were four
members present at the hearing. Two members voted in favor of the motion to approve
the, request and two members voted against the requested variance. The motion was
denied due to lack of majority.
The property owner is appealing the May 4, 2006, denial of the Zoning Board of
Appeal denial of a 1 '/2 ft driveway width variance to allow a driveway width of 10'/2 ft.
W
June 7, 2006 City of Edina
Camelot Construction
15472 Filmore Street
Elk River, MN 55330
Re: 4622 Drexel Ave., Edina, MN case file B- 06 -24.
Dear Mr. Miller,
The Edina City Council at their meeting of June 6, 2006, granted a 60 -day
extension of your variance application B- 06 -24, 4622 Drexel Ave. for a driveway
width variance. The action was necessary to extend the 60 -day time limit for
taking action on your variance application. The City Council extended the
application for an additional 60 days in order for the Council to hear and consider
your appeal of the variance denial. The appeal will be heard on Tuesday, June
20, 2006 at 7:00 in the Edina Council Chambers, Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th
St. If you should have any questions please contact me at your earliest
convenience.
Sincerely,
Kris Aaker
Assistant Planner
952 - 826 -0461
City Hall 952 - 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390
EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379
Robert Miller
4622 Drexel Avenue
Edina, Minnesota
55424
City of Edina
Mayor and City Council Members
Care of: City Clerk
Re: Appeal to City Council
4622 Drexel Avenue South Hardship Variance
Steep Drive in front of garage
5 -15 -06
I am requesting a hearing to appeal the decision of the Zoning board
regarding the request for hardship on the steep slope in front of our
garage.
I would like to relocate my driveway to the South side of my property,
and build a detached garage in the back yard, with a safely sloped
area in front of it, to avoid slips, falls, and vehicles sliding across the
public sidewalk and into the street.
The votes on the first variance meeting would approve the request
with the driveway width change from 12 to 10 feet, and the second
meeting was a 2/2 vote with the revision as requested by Michael
Fischer of the Zoning Board.
Thank you for your time on this matter,
Robert Miller, Owner
�okNA C� �
X006
CFO
a
MEMORANDUM
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF EDINA
DATE: March 29, 2006 (revised June 16, 2006)
TO: Kris Aaker — Assistant Planner
FROM: Wayne Houle — City Engineer 0
C: Joyce Repya — Associate Planner
Roger Glanzer — Utility Superintendent
Engineering Curb Cut Permit File
SUBJECT: Curb cut request for 4622 Drexel Avenue
Engineering has reviewed the above request to move the existing curb cut located along the
northerly property line to the southerly property line. After reviewing City Code Section 1205,
1 do not object to this curb cut relocation. I understand that Associate Planner - Joyce Repya,
staff liaison with the Heritage Preservation Board, also does not object to this curb cut
relocation.
Engineering requires that the applicant re- establish the existing curb cut with the proper
concrete curb and gutter, boulevard area, and new sidewalk as part of the curb cut permit.
The applicant shall also contact Roger Glanzer — Edna Utility Superintendent to perform an
inspection of the catch basin that is located in the proposed curb cut location. The new catch
basin casting along with any other upgrades to the catch basin will also be at the applicant's
expense.
Engineering also requires that the applicant add a concrete curb (4-6" curb) along the
southerly edge of the proposed driveway. This curb will retain the surface drainage
from and to 4622 Drexel Avenue. Staff would also suggest that the drive be sloped to
the north from the house to the sidewalk to prevent water from draining onto the
adjoining property.
Please contact me if you need additional information.
Thanks
BOARD MEETING MINUTES MAY 4, 2006
B -06 -23 Camelot Construction
4622 Drexel Avenue
Request: Driveway Width Variance
Ms. Aaker informed the Board the property owners of 4622 Drexel Ave.
So. have applied for a 1 Y2 ft driveway width variance to allow access into the
rear yard of their, property for the construction of a detached two car garage. The
proposed driveway will be 10 Y2 ft in width. The Zoning Ordinance requires new
driveways to be 12 ft in width.
Ms. Aaker explained to the Board on April 6, 2006, the property owners
requested a similar variance for the driveway width from the Zoning Board of
Appeals. The request was for a 6 inch variance to allow for a driveway width of
11 Y2% There were three members present at the hearing. The 11 Y2 ft driveway
width variance was denied by a 2 -1 vote. Two of the members felt a driveway
width variance would be appropriate however; one of the members supporting a
driveway width variance voted to deny because in his opinion the driveway
should be constructed less than 11 1/2 ft in width as requested. The Board
member believed the driveway width should be similar in width to others in the
neighborhood, (8 -10 ft in width) and to allow spacing between the subject
driveway and the driveway to the south. One Board member supported the
request as submitted and the third felt there was no undue hardship present in
support of a variance approval.
Ms. Aaker concluded the homeowner has re- applied for a driveway width
variance narrower than originally requested at the suggestion of one of the
Zoning Board members. The new driveway will have a "stepped" retaining wall
along the north side and will be at the same grade as the neighbor's driveway to
the south. There will be an 18 ft planting strip between the subject driveway and
the driveway to the south. The proposed 10 Y2 ft wide driveway will still be wider
than many of the driveways that currently exist on the block and within the
Country Club District.
Mr. Samuelson representative for the proponents, Mr. Hoffman and Mr.
Miller was present to respond to questions from the Board. Interested neighbors
were also present.
Mrs. Utne asked Ms. Aaker to clarify the request. Ms. Aaker told the
Board the proponent is requesting a variance from the City's driveway width
requirement of 12 feet. Ms. Aaker explained this request was previously heard
by another Board and the request was denied with a 2 -1 vote. The request failed
.because one of the Zoning Board members felt that the requested driveway
width of 11.6" was too wide for the neighborhood and suggested that the
proponents return to a Board with a proposal for a driveway less wide. The.
Board Member indicated he would have supported the variance request if the
width of the driveway was reduced.
Mrs. Scherer said as she reviewed packet materials she observed another
issue that was mentioned is the slope of the proposed new driveway is reduced,
creating a safer driveway. Ms. Aaker responded that is correct. The new
driveway will be relocated to the south side of the lot and constructed at a lesser
grade.
Mr: Samuelson addressed the Board and informed them he is
representing Matt Hoffman the proponent. With graphics he pointed out the
existing driveway pitch and the pitch of the proposed new driveway. Mr.
Samuelson noted the proposed driveway pitch has almost a 50% reduction. He
added the proponent has two young children and it is very important to him that
the driveway is constructed at a grade less steep. Mr. Samuelson said a concern
mentioned at the previous meeting was the height of the proposed retaining wall.
Mr. Samuelson said after careful review the retaining wall was redesigned and
now will be terraced reducing the height of the wall in increments. Continuing,
Mr. Samuelson said the plan before the Board this evening is at the suggestion
of Mike Fischer, Zoning Board Member who at the last meeting suggested
reducing the width of the driveway. Mr. Samuelson said Mr. Fischer felt a
driveway width of over 11 feet was out of character in the Country Club
neighborhood since most of the driveway widths in the district are considerably
less. Mr. Samuelson asked the Board to note the reduction in driveway width
and the proposed "strip of land" between the subject driveway and the abutting
driveway. Concluding, Mr. Samuelson said in his opinion the reduction in
driveway slope and retaining wall height is an important improvement to the lot.
He also added the renovation of the home and the construction and placement of
the garage in the rear yard vs. the existing "tuck under" situation is of benefit to
the District and more in keeping with the look and feel of the Country Club
neighborhood.
Mr. Delcinedes, 4624 Drexel Avenue, told the Board his driveway is at
least as steep as the subject driveway, adding he spoke with the previous owner,
Mr. Fulton and Mr. Fulton indicated to him his vehicles never "slid down" the
driveway. Mr. Delcinedes said the Country Club neighborhood consists of 554
homes, adding in his opinion no one would want to share a driveway if they didn't
have too. Continuing, Mr. Delcinedes said he spoke with a realtor, Mr.
McDonnell who informed him if the driveway was moved from north to south the
new driveway location would have a negative impact on his property values. Mr.
Delcinedes told the Board Mr. McDonnell indicated his willingness to testify to
that fact. With photos Mr. Delcinedes pointed out to the Board there are a
number of homes (over 40) in the District with "tuck under" garages, adding at
the previous meeting there was a statement indicating garages in the rear yard
are more in keeping with the district, and these photo's show that statement was
unfounded. Concluding, Mr. Delicinedes informed the Board in his neighborhood
there are 22 young children and the proposed driveway change would endanger
not only his children but the neighborhood children that go in and out of his yard.
Mrs. Vasaly asked Mr. Delcinedes the width of his driveway. Mr.
Delcinedes responded he believes his driveway is 8 feet in width. Mr.
Delcinedes reiterated he has a concern with safety, reiterating side -by -side
driveways pose a safety concern for children and a financial concern for his
property. He added he had a great relationship with the former neighbor and is
worried that a variance will be approved for a contractor (not a resident) coming
in to "flip" this house.
Mrs. Delcinedes, 4624 Drexel Avenue asked the Board to deny this
request. She stated the proponent hasn't been neighborly and with photos
shared with the Board pictures of neighborhood children sliding and
snowboarding down the proponent's driveway and yard. She pointed out the
proponent was remiss in shoveling their sidewalk and driveway, adding if the
driveway was shoveled a vehicle wouldn't slip.
Ms. Neale, 4623 Drexel told the Board a majority of neighbors object to
this request, adding there is no hardship to support the change in driveway
location, adding the proposed location is detrimental to the safety of the
neighborhood children. Ms. Neale pointed out a tree will be removed to
accommodate the new driveway and garage, and a catch basin will have to be
relocated. Continuing, Ms. Neale submitted to the Board a petition from
neighbors indicating their objection to the change in driveway location. Ms.
Neale asked the Board to reject this request pointing out the neighbors strongly
object to relocating the driveway and have unanimously rejected this request.
Ms. Jackson, 4604 Drexel Avenue stated the proposed change in
driveway places an undue hardship on the Delcinedes property. The Delcinedes
should not have a driveway next to theirs which would create an unsafe situation.
Ms. Herman, 4602 Drexel told the Board she lives in a house with a
shared driveway, adding in her opinion it isn't desirable. Ms. Herman said the
proposed "strip" of grass between drives, in her opinion, looks awful.
Mrs. Scherer asked Ms. Aaker if all the driveways along Drexel have their
driveways on the north side. Ms. Aaker responded at least in the immediate area
it appears the majority of the homes have the driveway on the north, however,
there are homes on the block that share a drive, with some driveways located on
the south side.
Mrs. Vasaly asked for clarification on the reduction in the slope of the
driveway. She said her main concern is with the slope of the driveway, adding
she wants some assurance the slope of the proposed driveway will be reduced if
this request is approved and the driveway relocated. Mr. Samuelson said the
grade of the existing driveway ranges from 887 at the street to 893.22 at the top
of the drive or a pitch of 8.43. The new driveway pitch is proposed at around
4.82 or roughly almost a 50% reduction. Mrs. Vasaly said she wanted to make
sure the new driveway doesn't have such a steep slope, adding she believes the
slope of the existing driveway presents a hardship and is unsafe.
Mrs. Vasaly moved to approve the request for a driveway width variance
noting the reduction in driveway slope is positive. Mrs. Scherer seconded the
motion for the purpose of discussion.
Mr. Schwartzbauer stated in his opinion there isn't enough room for two
driveways in that location. Mr. Schwartzbauer acknowledged the attractiveness
of the proposed remodel; however, he believes an attractive home could be
constructed leaving the driveway exactly where it is. Mr. Schwartzbauer said he
also feels a shared driveway situation is unsafe.
Mrs. Scherer said she believes the house redesign is good, but cannot be
persuaded to approve this variance. She added in her opinion keeping the
driveway on the north side of the property is consistent with driveway placement
in this immediate neighborhood.
Mrs. Vasaly stated she supports the variance. She added she believes
the steep grade of the driveway poses a safety issue; she also observed the
relocation of the driveway was reviewed by both the City Engineer and Staff
Liaison to the Heritage Preservation Board. Mrs. Vasaly also noted the majority
of driveways in the District are not 12 feet in width, they are less. Concluding,
Mrs. Vasaly said the photo's the Board viewed this evening with children using
the subject property and subject driveway to sled and snowboard confirms in her
mind reducing the slope of the driveway is an improvement which addresses the
safety issue.
Chair Utne told the Board she supports the request. She said what the
Board is considering at this time is a variance for driveway width, reiterating she
supports the variance as presented, adding it is important to note the majority of
the driveways in the Country Club District are not 12 feet wide, and "holding" this
property to the Code would be a hardship.
Chair Utne called the vote; Ayes; Vasaly, Utne. Nays; Schwartzbauer,
Scherer. Motion failed.
Chair Utne informed Mr. Samuelson the Board's decision can be appealed
to the City Council.
f�
�Alg
_,.- %T
am
.r r
a ;
LOCATION MAP
DRIVEWAY
s
ODUhrRY CLUB RD
EDWA CC
PID:1802824130010
4622 Drexel Ave
Edina, MN 55424
r-k
O�
Legend
Highlighted Feahae
Sheet Naas Labels
NluniWal Boundary
,�/ Creeks
pLakes
pParks
pPawels
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 4, 2006
TO: Zoning Board of Appeals
FROM: Kris Aaker, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: 4622 Drexel Ave. So., Driveway width variance
The property owners of 4622 Drexel Ave. So. have applied for a 1 Y2 ft driveway
width variance to allow access into the rear yard of their property for the
construction of a detached two car garage. The proposed driveway will be 10 Y2 ft
in width. The Zoning Ordinance requires new driveways to be 12 ft in width.
On April 6, 2006, the property owners requested a similar variance for the
driveway width from the Zoning Board of Appeals. The request was for a 6 inch
variance to allow for a driveway width of 11 Y2 ft. There were three members
present at the hearing. The 11 Y2 ft driveway width variance was denied by a 2 -1
vote. Two of the members felt a driveway width variance would be appropriate
however; one of the members supporting a driveway change voted for denial
because it was the Board member's opinion the driveway should be less than 11
1/2 ft as requested. The Board member believed the driveway width should be
similar in width to others in the neighborhood, (8 -10 ft in width), to allow spacing
between the subject driveway and the driveway to the south. One Board member
supported the request as submitted and the third felt there is no undue hardship
present in support of a variance approval.
The homeowner has re- applied for a driveway width variance narrower than
originally requested at the suggestion of one of the Zoning Board members. The
new driveway will have a "stepped" retaining wall along the north side and will be
at the same grade as the neighbor's driveway to the south. There will be an 18 ft
planting strip between the subject driveway and the driveway to the south. The
proposed 10 Y2 ft wide driveway will still be wider than many of the driveways that
currently exist on the block and within the Country Club District.
Attached for reference are the following materials:
Original site plans.
Staff report
Minutes of the April 6, 2006 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals.
F ^
01 o Re
CASE NUMBER
DATE 2
FEE PAID 2W 00
Planning Department
4801 West Fiftieth Street * Edina, MN 55424 * (952) 826 -0369 FAX (952) 826 -0389
APPLICATION FOR: VARIANCE /FEE RES. $200 /NON -RES. $400
APPLICANT:
NAME:
ADDRESS /ZIP: IM jf.gw we Ck- CLK -2tuoYL nor' 5-5336 PHONE:(D,0417 -4"7
PROPERTY OWNER:
NAME: 4)'6 F 1 r1�11e2
ADDRESS /ZIP: -( (DD�a lzeF 6 �s'YZ� -( PHONE:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: L-4 -12. �- MAruoou -A 74k3°
G t Vr SIM(c r p7r r/L w,4y S 0cr
PROPERTY ADDRESS:�CO,Z 172e'XEL i)va,
PRESENT ZONING: P.I.D.# I
EXPLANATION. OF REQUEST: DP,(uG1044 -1`01W 110021+221,6
(Use reverse side or additional pages if necessary)
ARCHITECT: NAME:1�Ay,i:> CG5o0 PHONE: U �,'�' —CNH --778
SURVEYOR: NAME ? s-%w--P H0NE:
Property ner's Signatur (Date) pplica t Signatu a (Date)
R
Zoning Board Application .............Page 2
Minnesota Statutes and Edina ordinances require that the
following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively.
The proposed variance will:
Relieve an undue hardship which was not self imposed or a
mere inconvenience.
Yes - The existing slope of the driveway is extremely dangerous.
Cars, parked in the driveway during slippery conditions, slide down
the driveway, across the sidewalk, and into the street.
Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property,
but not applicable to other property, in the vicinity or zoning
district.
Yes — See same answer above
Preserve a substantial property right possessed by other
property in the vicinity and zoning district.
Yes - To bring property into alignment with original Country Club
Historical preservation, which stated no garages facing the street in
front of house.
Not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
other property in the vicinity or zoning district.
Yes - Extensive remodel and addition improves the property value in
the neighborhood, and brings it in alignment with the surrounding
homes and neighborhood.
City of Edina
May 4, 2006
Camelot Construction
15472 Filmore Street
Elk River, MN 55330
Re: 4622 Drexel Avenue, Edina, MN - B -06 -24 — a driveway width variance for
4622 Drexel Avenue, Edina, MN
Dear Mr. Miller:
In connection with your recent request for a driveway width variance, which was heard by
the Edina Zoning Board on Thursday, May 4, 2006, may we advise you that same has
been denied.
If you wish to appeal the decision of the Zoning Board to the Edina City Council, a letter of
intent must be submitted to the City Clerk no later than May 14, 2006.
If you have further questions on this matter, please feel free to contact me at
952 - 826 -0465.
Sincerely,
Jackie Hoogenakker
Zoning Board of Appeals
h
City Hall
4801 WEST 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394
www.cityofedina.com
952 - 927 -8861
FAX 952 - 826 -0390
TTY 952 - 826 -0379
Edina City Council
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
To Whom It May Concern:
This is a letter of support for Robert Miller, owner of the home at 4622 Drexel Avenue
South. Plans for a much - needed, extensive renovation of the home designated above are
in place pending approval and we wish to state our approval of these plans.
Our home is located-just next door to the home in question, on the lot to the north, at
• 0/_V L CAcl Avet]ue South, and we recently uiidl stook a inasslve addiiiolrii and exterior
renovation on it. We,,purchased the home in 1985 -86 and have worked to bring it up to
the neighborhood standard ever since, so we thoroughly understand Mr. Miller's desire to
do the same. Both houses were /are candidates for this type of improvement.
We are particularly pleased to note that Mr. Miller is planning on relocating the driveway.
The current one is on an uphill slope which makes it very treacherous during the winter.
Cars cannot be parked at that time safely and have, in the past, slid back down into the
street. Walking on it during the winter is dangerous as well. Under the winter conditions
Minnesota provides, it's almost impossible to keep it clear, ice -free, and consequently
safe for all who use it. The plans for the driveway change appear to solve those
problems. In addition, we are delighted with the architectural ideas and changes that Mr.
Miller proposes for the home's exterior. The home has needed work for many years and
these architectural plans will improve and enhance the home greatly, producing an eye
pleasing result which will be much more in keeping with the existing homes in the
Country Club neighborhood. It has to be wonderful for all of the surrounding neighbors
that both of these homes, side by side, will not only improve the value of the homes on
Drexel, but be pleasant to look at as well.
iu closing, we extend our thanks to the City Council fur considering all of the requests put
forth by Mr. Miller, and offer our approval and support for what he wishes to accomplish.
We voice no objections to Mr. Miller's intentions for the home and are looking forward
to having him and his family as our neighbors. Thank you for your time and
consideration.
Yours very truly,
Wayne and Anne Whitman
Jackie Hoogenakker
From: Kelly Jackson oackson4626 @mac.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 2:04 PM
To: Jackie Hoogenakker
Cc: Christina Delianidis
Subject: 4622 Drexel Avenue variance appeal
Ms. Hoogenakker,
The purpose of this message is to restate our opposition to the lot width variance request for the property located at
4622 Drexel Avenue in Edina. The original letter containing our concerns, dated March 29, 2006 is included below.
Please forward this message to City Council members Scot Housh, Alice Hulbert, Linda Masica and Ann Swenson.
We regret we will be unable to attend the June 20 meeting; we hope you will consider our concerns when making your
decision.
Thank you, again, for your consideration,
Kelly and Jamie Jackson
4626 Drexel Avenue, Edina
Begin forwarded message:
From: Kelly Jackson <1ackso14626 mac_com>
Date: March 29, 2006 3:12:03 PM CST
To: ib.QQ9enaklcer- &i. edina.,mn.us
Cc: Christina Delianidis <Cisco,a_ndClint@aol.com>
Subject: 4622 Drexel Avenue
To Whom it May Concern,
This letter is in regard to the proposed Driveway Width Variance requested for the above captioned
property. As Property Owners Within 200 Feet, we have the following concerns about the proposed
change:
1.) The variance suggests a change in the appearance of the property. Although we realize homes in the
neighborhood can, and should, be maintained and improved, it should be done in a manner that maintains
the historical and aesthetic integrity of the neighborhood. Inasmuch as there have been recent projects that
have not met that criteria, we are concerned about any proposed changes.
2.) There are many young children on our block, including our three, who spend much of their outside
time playing in the front yards of the neighborhood; they often run between each others' yards. We are
concerned that any proposed changes to the driveway may impede driver visibility and compromise the
safety of our children.
3.) As a general comment, we know from past personal experience that it is not desirable to have
adjacent/abutting driveways. A "shared" driveway makes it difficult to take full advantage of one's
property in terms of parking, playing, etc.
We regret we will be unable to attend the Zoning Board hearing on April 6; we hope this letter clearly
communicates our concerns.
Thank you for your consideration,
Kelly and Jamie Jackson
/_ /1 C /,)A AK
DREXEL AVENUE PETITION OPPOSING CASE FILE B -06 -23
VARIANCE APPLICATION FOR 4622 DREXEL AVENUE
1.5' DRIVEWAY WIDTH VARIANCE AND ADJACENT
PROPERTY /NEW CURB CUT /DRIVEWAY RELOCATED
NAME SIGNATURE PROPERTY OWNER DATE
Ka (A 00CA
- - -%_,I -1 (
3 O
Pvcx- - i 110e
?4.
25.
WwGE ST
7 "04t%p
LOCATION MAP
I
8
S
COUNTRY CLUB RD
EDINA (T
4622 DREXEL AVENUE
All
PID: 1802824130010 k4
tie
1'
Edina, MN 55424 E"�► �N'
Legend
® Kgblipbled Feature
Sacral Narne Labals
�o/ lAuncgal Boundary
'Al creaks
0 Lakes
0 Parts
Parcels
S
EDINA ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
STAFF REPORT
APRIL 6, 2006
B -06 -18 Camelot Construction /Robert J Miller
4622 Drexel Ave. So.
Lot 12, Block 7, Country Club
Zoning: R -1
Request: Driveway width variance
Background
The subject property is located on the west side of Drexel Ave. consisting of a
two story home with a front loading, two car garage. The property owner is
planning to remodel and add onto the house. The plan will include removing the
existing driveway and curb cut, converting the existing garage into living space,
adding to the back of the home on both the first and second floors and
constructing a new detached garage in the rear yard. The new detached garage
would be accessed by a new driveway installed along the south side of the
property. All aspects of the project conform to the ordinance requirements with
the exception of the proposed driveway width along the south wall of the home.
The minimum width required for newly constructed driveway is 12 ft. The
property owner is proposing a new driveway width of approximately 11 1/2 ft.
Issues /Analysis
The property is located in the historic Country Club District. All new structures,
including the proposed garage, require a Certificate of Appropriateness through
the Heritage Preservation Board. The new garage structure will be reviewed by
the Heritage Preservation Board if a detached garage in the rear yard is allowed
access by approval of the proposed driveway. The change in curb -cut and
driveway has been reviewed and deemed acceptable by both the City Engineer
and the Staff liaison to the Heritage Preservation Board, (see attached
memorandums). No Engineering or Heritage Preservation basis for denial was
identified for the curb cut location or driveway change.
The proposed driveway will be installed at the same grade as the adjacent
driveway to the south. A retaining wall will be installed along the north side of the
driveway on the subject property. A fire place chimney will be removed along the
south wall of the home to accommodate the new driveway. The south - facing
basement windows will have glass block installed with driveway asphalt to abut
the windows. No window wells are proposed along the south wall of the home.
The proposed driveway will not be a shared or common driveway with the
existing driveway to the south located on the 4224 Drexel property. There are no
cross easements proposed between properties.
There are many driveways in the Country Club District that are less than 12 ft in
width. The adjacent property to the south has a driveway width of 8 ft for most of
its length. Shared and abutting driveways and driveways widths less than 10 ft in
the Country Club are not uncommon.
Conclusion /Recommendation
The proposed request is minimal and will preserve a substantial property right
enjoyed by others in the Country Club District. Staff supports the request subject
to the plans presented.
oite
CASE NUMBE I S
DATE
FEE PAID •
Planning Department www.cihofedine.com
4801 West Fiftieth Street * Edina, MN 55424 * (952) 826 -0369 FAX (952) 826 -0389
APPLICATION FOR: VARIANCEIFEE RES. $200 1NON -RES. $400
APPLICANT: �► �f�
NAME: � uNe.tc>•'� ,rtS�.G�0-n (v-tG
ADDRESS1ZIP:L5-q7a Flvoc. C 530 PHONE:
PROPERTY OWNER:
NAME:
ADDRESS/ZIP: i� �� �RG11 EC.. PHONE:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: L+ IZ aLK- 3 %K MU
PROPERTY ADDRESS: �I� �� l7iLE11C r- -t-
PRESENT ZONING: P.I.D.# D4 — Y `13
EXPLANATION OF REQUEST:il
(Use reverse side or additional pages if necessary) G
ARCHITECT: NAME: _ auU jl SQ mkjSy✓N PHONE:
SURVEYOR: NAME:Su (Zue cirJfc6C-jL6,Nccrtifj(c r'kFr55, "isPHONE:
Property O er's Signature ( ate) Applican 's Vgnature (Date)
Zoning Board Application .............Page 2
Minnesota Statutes and Edina ordinances require that the
following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively.
The proposed variance will:
Relieve an undue hardship which was not self imposed or a
mere inconvenience.
Yes - The existing slope of the driveway is extremely dangerous.
Cars, parked in the driveway during slippery conditions, slide down
the driveway, across the sidewalk, and into the street.
Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property,
but not applicable to other property, in the vicinity or zoning
district.
Yes — See same answer above
Preserve a substantial property right possessed by other
property in the vicinity and zoning district.
Yes - To bring property into alignment with original Country Club
Historical preservation, which stated no garages facing the street in
front of house.
Not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
other property in the vicinity or zoning district.
Yes - Extensive remodel and addition improves the property value in
the neighborhood, and brings it in alignment with the surrounding
homes and neighborhood.
City of Edina
April 7, 2006
Camelot Construction /Robert Miller
4622 Drexel Avenue
Edina, MN 55424
Re: B -06 -18 — a driveway width variance for 4622 Drexel Avenue, Edina, MN
Dear Mr. Miller:
In connection with your recent request for a driveway width variance, which was heard by
the Edina Zoning Board on Thursday, April 6, 2006, may we advise you that same has
been denied.
If you wish to appeal the decision of the Zoning Board to the Edina City Council, a letter of
intent must be submitted to the City Clerk no later than April 16, 2006.
If you have further questions on this matter, please feel free to contact me at
952 - 826 -0465.
Jackie Hoogenakker
Zoning Board of Appeals
I
City Hall 952 - 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390
EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379
Zoning Board April 6, 2006 meeting minutes.
B -06 -18 Camelot Construction /Robert J Miller
4622 Drexel Ave. So.
Lot 12, Block 7, Country Club
Request: Driveway width variance
Ms. Aaker informed the Board the subject property is located on the west
side of Drexel Ave. consisting of a two story home with a front loading, two car
garage. The property owner is planning to remodel and add onto the house. The
plan will include removing the existing driveway and curb cut, converting the
existing garage into living space, adding to the back of the home on both the first
and second floors and constructing a new detached garage in the rear yard. The
new detached garage would be accessed by a new driveway installed along the
south side of the property. All aspects of the project conform to the ordinance
requirements with the exception of the proposed driveway width along the south
wall of the home. The minimum width required for newly constructed driveway is
12 ft. The property owner is proposing a new driveway width of approximately 11
1/2 ft.
Ms. Aaker explained the property is located in the historic Country Club
District. All new structures, including the proposed garage, require a Certificate of
Appropriateness through the Heritage Preservation Board. The new garage
structure will be reviewed by the Heritage Preservation Board if a detached
garage in the rear yard is allowed access by approval of the proposed driveway.
The change in curb -cut and driveway has been reviewed and deemed
acceptable by both the City Engineer and the Staff liaison to the Heritage
Preservation Board, (see attached memorandums). No Engineering or Heritage
Preservation basis for denial was identified for the curb cut location or driveway
change.
Ms. Aaker explained the proposed driveway will be installed at the same
grade as the adjacent driveway to the south. A retaining wall will be installed
along the north side of the driveway on the subject property. A fire place chimney
will be removed along the south wall of the home to accommodate the new
driveway. The south - facing basement windows will have glass block installed
with driveway asphalt to abut the windows. No window wells are proposed along
the south wall of the home. The proposed driveway will not be a shared or
common driveway with the existing driveway to the south located on the 4224
Drexel property. There are no cross easements proposed between properties.
Ms. Aaker asked the Board to note there are many driveways in the Country Club
District that are less than 12 ft in width. The adjacent property to the south has a
driveway width of 8 ft for most of its length. Shared and abutting driveways and
driveways widths less than 10 ft in the Country Club are not uncommon.
Ms. Aaker concluded the proposed request is minimal and will preserve a
substantial property right enjoyed by others in the Country Club District. Staff
supports the request subject to the plans presented.
The proponents, Mr. Miller and Mr. Hoffman were present to respond to
questions. Interested neighbors were also present.
Chair Schwartzbauer noted the packet contained a letter from a neighbor
suggesting that the driveway continue to be located along the north property line
to access the new garage. Chair Schwartzbauer asked if that was ever
considered. Ms. Aaker responded if one looks at the spacing on that side of the
house it would be very difficult to place a driveway in that location.
Mrs. Vasaly said the proponent indicated the slope of the driveway
presents a danger during winter months because of the potential for vehicles to
"slip down" the driveway unto the sidewalk or street. Ms. Aaker acknowledged
the driveway does slope, adding the City doesn't have a mechanism in place that
addresses driveway slope. Mrs. Vasaly commented if she read the plan correctly
the proposed driveway slope will be lessened as a result of this proposal. Ms.
Aaker responded that is correct the new driveway will improve the slope.
Mr. Fischer asked the applicant if the proposed driveway would be
concrete or asphalt. Mr. Fischer also observed it appears the adjacent
neighbor's driveway (to the south) is constructed right up to the common property
line. Ms. Aaker confirmed that statement. With regard to asphalt driveways Ms.
Aaker pointed out the majority of driveways in the Country Club area are
concrete, not asphalt. Continuing, Ms. Aaker told the Board if approved they can
stipulate the type of material used for the driveway.
Mr. Fischer commented the variance is for six inches, adding as he
viewed the Country Club neighborhood a driveway width of 12 feet appears
larger than most. Ms. Aaker responded that is correct a majority of driveways in
the District are between eight and ten feet.
Mr. Hoffman addressed the Board and told them he parked his vehicle in
the driveway this past winter and the vehicle slid down the driveway onto the
sidewalk. Continuing, Mr. Hoffman said he was surprised at the interest this
request generated especially with regard to the safety of children. Mr. Hoffman
said the safety of children, his and the neighboring children are of the utmost
importance.
Mr. Delcinedes, 4624 Drexel Avenue (neighbor to the south) told the
Board he doesn't support the variance request. Mr. Delcinedes said the reason
the vehicle slid down the driveway was because the driveway wasn't shoveled.
Continuing, Mr. Delcinedes informed the Board in the immediate area there are
22 children and the proposed driveway endangers them. He added in his opinion
it is detrimental to have a driveway to driveway situation with a grade change.
Mr. Delcinedes questioned Mr. Hoffman if he ever constructed a home in the
Country Club District, adding when he heard the proposed driveway may be
constructed with asphalt he cringed.
Mrs. Vasaly said as she views the plans it appears the Delcinedes
driveway is only 8 feet in width. Mr. Delcinedes responded that is correct.
Mrs. Delcinedes told the Board during the past winter months there were
many times the driveway and sidewalk of the home at 4622 Drexel was not
shoveled. Continuing, Mrs. Delcinedes said she is very fearful for the safety of
her children, especially in light of the possibility of a shared driveway.
Mrs. Delcinedes said the neighborhood is very friendly and people spend a lot of
time visiting especially in their front yard areas. Mrs. Delcinedes said the change
in driveway location will not only negatively impact her family but will negatively
impact other properties in the immediate area. Concluding, Mrs. Delcinedes said
she has a fear one of her children could be injured exiting their car if the
neighbors are exiting their new driveway at the same time.
Ms. Herman, 4602 Drexel Avenue told the Board she has a shared
driveway and would rather not have one. She stated a shared driveway is not
desirable and the mass this will create will be unappealing.
Ms. Shannon Neale, 4623 Drexel Avenue, acknowledged there are shared
driveways in the area, but that doesn't mean they work well. Ms. Neale pointed
out many side by side driveways have space between them like a strip of
greenery. Continuing, Ms. Neale pointed out there is also a drain located at the
end of the subject driveway which is proposed to change. She said she is
worried that a change in the drain system could create the potential to flood.
Mrs. Vasaly questioned the drain system that will be changed. Mr.
Hoffman responded the City Engineer has reviewed their proposal and found no
problem with it, and supports it. Continuing, Mr. Hoffman said with regard to
asphalt vs. concrete it was never his intent to construct an asphalt driveway - it
will be concrete. Continuing, Mr. Hoffman said when he purchased his home it
needed a lot of work. He told the Board he met with City staff and was informed
of the Code with regard to driveway width, and applied for a variance. Mr.
Hoffman said he believes relocating the garage in the rear yard is more in
keeping with the area. Concluding, Mr. Hoffman acknowledged he never
constructed a home in the Country Club area of Edina, but does build a quality
home.
Mr. Fischer acknowledged the Code requires a driveway width of 12 feet,
but pointed out the Code is City wide and in certain areas of smaller lots a 12 foot
wide driveway doesn't make sense and in many cases a 12 foot driveway is
detrimental to the "look" of the neighborhood. Continuing, Mr. Fischer said he
believes this issue can be resolved, adding sometimes the best solution would be
to grant a greater variance. Mr. Fischer stated in his opinion a driveway width in
this area would be more aesthetically pleasing between 9 and 10 feet.
Ms. Aaker said she understands Mr. Fischer's point of view. She said
variances have been granted in the City's more "urban" areas for driveways
under 12 feet in width.
Mr. Fischer said the logic used to approach a variance should be to
achieve a better end result, adding in all honestly he doesn't feel a 12 foot
driveway is best for this lot and this neighborhood. Mr. Fischer said he is
encouraged by the fact there would be a turn - around area in the rear yard
enabling vehicles to enter the street front first, adding he believes the width of the
drive should be less and if approved the driveway should be concrete or pavers,
not asphalt.
Mrs. Vasaly said she would have a hard time denying this request. She
said she agrees the driveway would better serve the subject site and area if it
were constructed less than 12 feet, adding the Board can't force the proponent to
reduce the driveway width. Continuing, Mrs. Vasaly said if she read the site plan
correctly the current driveway is less than 12 feet in width. Mr. Hoffman said he
would have no problem reducing the width of the driveway.
Ms. Aaker said if the driveway width is reduced Mr. Hoffman would have
to re -apply for a variance because the plans presented this evening are what the
Board must act on.
Chair Schwartzbauer stated he can't support the variance as presented,
adding in his opinion there is no hardship. He added he just doesn't like the
proposed location of the new driveway.
Mrs. Vasaly moved variance approval noting a hardship exists on this lot,
the lot is non - conforming at 60 feet wide, adding a lot with this width cannot
accommodate a 12 foot driveway to meet code requirements. Mr. Fischer
seconded the motion.
Chair Schwartzbauer stated he is opposed to the motion and cannot
support the variance. He said in his opinion if this variance is granted it will alter
the surrounding area, reiterating in his opinion, there is no hardship.
Ayes, Vasaly. Nays, Schwartzbauer, Fischer. Motion denied.
Mr. Fischer explained his "No" vote is because he could support a
driveway width variance, but not this one. Mr. Fischer reiterated he could
support a greater variance. Mr. Fischer stated in his opinion there is a hardship
present to support the granting of a greater variance., A 12 foot or 11'6" driveway
is too wide for this neighborhood, and out of character.
Mrs. Vasaly also pointed out there is nothing in the Code prohibiting
driveways from abutting each other, or being relocated, adding in this
neighborhood there appears to be a number of side by side driveways with the
majority of the driveways less than 12 feet in width.
Mr. Fischer asked Ms. Aaker if the proponents can re -apply for a greater
variance. Ms. Aaker responded in the affirmative. Continuing, Mr. Fischer told
the proponents they can appeal the Board's decision to the City Council. Mr.
Fischer reiterated he believes a hardship exists on these smaller lots, adding he
could support a greater variance. He added a driveway width between 9 and 10
feet would make sense to him, and is more in keeping with the streetscape of the
Country Club neighborhood.
DATE: March 29,2006
MEMORANDUM
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF EDINA
TO: Kris Aaker — Assistant Planner
FROM: Wayne Houle — City Engineer
C: Joyce Repya — Associate Planner
Roger Glanzer — Utility Superintendent
Engineering Curb Cut Permit File
SUBJECT: Curb cut request for 4622 Drexel Avenue
Engineering has reviewed the above request to move the existing curb cut located along the
northerly property line to the southerly property line. After reviewing City Code Section 1205,
1 do not object to this curb cut relocation. I understand that Associate Planner - Joyce Repya,
staff liaison with the Heritage Preservation Board, also does not object to this curb cut
relocation.
Engineering requires that the applicant re- establish the existing curb cut with the proper
concrete curb and gutter, boulevard area, and new sidewalk as part of the curb cut permit.
The applicant shall also contact Roger Glanzer — Edna Utility Superintendent to perform an
inspection of the catch basin that is located in the proposed curb cut location. The new catch
basin casting along with any other upgrades to the catch basin will also be at the applicant's
expense.
Please contact me if you need additional information.
Thanks
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kris Aaker, Assistant Planner
FROM: Joyce Repya, Associate Planner
Heritage Preservation Board Staff
SUBJECT: New Curb Cut Applications in the Country
Club District
DATE: I March 31, 2006
Because the Country Club District is designated an Edina Heritage Landmark District, I
review applications for new curb cuts in the District in addition to the Engineering
Department. The following elements are considered in the review:
• When a new curb cut is created, the old curb cut must be removed.
• New curb and gutter shall replace the old curb cut.
• No boulevard trees shall be compromised by the new curb cut.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Zoning Board of Appeals and Adjustments
FROM: Joyce Repya, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Detached Garages in the Country Club District
DATE: April 6, 2006
When addressing new detached garages in the Country Club District, Heritage
Preservation Consultant Robert Vogel has advised the Heritage Preservation Board that
the Secretary of the Interior's standards for the treatment of historic properties recognizes
new construction as an appropriate undertaking providing the new construction is
compatible in size, scale, materials, color and texture with other buildings in the
neighborhood. Furthermore, detached garages are consistent with the historic pattern of
residential development in the Country Club District.
When reviewing plans for new detached garages in the Country Club District, in addition
to determining that the architectural style is compatible with the style of the home, the
Heritage Preservation Board also observes the following design guidelines:
• No detached garage should be taller, longer, or wider than the house.
• No detached garage should have a roofline taller than that of adjacent
homes.
Undecorated side walls longer than 16 feet should be avoided whenever
possible.
New garages should be differentiated from historic homes and clearly
identifiable as contemporary works.
The Heritage Preservation Board would consider a new detached garage in the rear yard
to be a positive for a property with a front loading garage because the vehicle parking and
storage would be moved from the front of the home into the rear yard.
Page 1 of l
Kris Aaker
From: CiscoandClint @aol.com
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 10:33 PM
To: Kris Aaker; Steve Kirchman; Steve Lillehaug; Joyce Repya
Subject: Lot 12, Block7 Country Club
To Whom It May Concern,
I am forwarding a letter sent by my husband, Daniel Delianedis, on March 26, to Ms. Jackie Hoogenakker. All
of your names have been mentioned through other a -mails sent to us regarding a hearing for a driveway width
variance. The hearing is scheduled for Thursday, April 6, 2006.
The letter was sent to Jackie Hoogenakker because her name was listed on the notice as the contact person to
submit letters expressing our views. We do know a few neighbors have already sent her letters opposing the
variance. Another neighbor has spoken with Jim Hovland and corresponded with him through e-mail. We
anticipate more letters to follow. I do know the few neighbors that will be in town (due to Edina's spring break)
will be at the hearing.
I also want you to know that I am against this driveway width variance. My reasons are strictly from my heart
as a concerned mother. It may be a few inches to the board, but it is a life that I am worried about! 1 have
totaled the number of children that live within the 200 feet of this driveway - there are 221 The only way these
children are able to get out of the street when on a wagon, bike, skate board, stroller or roller skates, is through
all of our driveways. If you drive on Drexel in the morning before school, during the day and after school you
will notice all of the kids playing in our front yards. You must be aware that the traffic situation has increased
too. All of the 22 children are of elementary school age. In the winter months our children use the drives to
slide down. The street and driveways are a hazard to us all. This will only add to the congestion.
I hope and pray you will consider our concerns. I am not against the home being updated. I am against the
driveway width variance because of the use of our driveway. It will absolutely become a shared driveway
because of the closeness already. It will be a hazard to our children.
Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
Christina Delianedis
3/31/2006
Daniel J. Delianedis
4624 Drexel Avenue
Edina, MN 55424
952 - 922 -8121
March 26, 2006
Ms. Jackie Hoogenakker
Edina City Hall Planning Commission
4801 West 50th Street,
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Ms. Hoogenaker,
My name is Daniel Delianedis. My family and I live at 4624 Drexel Avenue. We moved into our
home in July of 2001. 1 have a wife and two daughters ages ten and four. I believe that we are the
fourth family to own this property since 1934 when it was built. We love Edina, MN and love the
Country Club District.
As you might know, the property to the north of us at 4622 Drexel was purchased by a
construction company, Camelot Construction Inc., located at 19393 Upland St NW, Elk River,
MN in December 2005. 1 received your announcement March 25, that Camelot Construction and
Robert J Miller is requesting a driveway width variance.
The following reasons are why I oppose granting a driveway width variance to Camelot
Construction.
1.) It is my understanding that the Edina City Planning Commission requires that any variance
must be agreed to by homeowners within 200' of the dwelling requesting the variance. I do not
wish to permit the variance. We would never have purchased our home in 2001 if there were a
shared or common driveway between us and 4622 Drexel.
2.) It is furthermore my understanding that the Edina City Planning Commission requires that all
driveways have at least 12' of clearance from a single family dwelling to any neighboring
property. The south facing wall structure at 4622 Drexel is about 26' long . It has only 9' 6" of
clearance from its' chimney to my property. There are also three south facing basement window
wells along the foundation. The distance from each window well to my property line is 10' 3 ".
There is 11'4" of clearance from the foundation to my property. This is just not enough
clearance according to the City of Edina's ordinance so again, l oppose granting a
driveway width variance.
3.) The most important reason for opposing the variance is the safety of my children and many
neighbors' children who often come to play at our house. The kids use our driveway to come and
go or when they take their bicycles and toys in and out. We have a fence that runs along the
back northern border of our property and across the driveway facing east. This fence has been
part of the property for more than 30 years. It allows us to keep our two dogs penned up and
keep a swing set for the kids.
If a variance were granted to build a driveway abutting ours, I worry about safety because the
new homeowners at 4622 Drexel will never be able see children at our fence gate (or adults for
that matter) as they drive out of their dwelling. The clearance from the rear window well to my
fence is 10' 3 ". If the property owner drove a Ford Explorer SUV (72" wide, 80" with rear view
mirrors extended) or a Ford Expedition (78" wide - -86" when you include mirrors) for example, the
driver will have only 37" of clearance. This means that they have 18 %" on either side of the
vehicle. There is therefore, no room for driver error. If a child, adult, or dog simply took one
step out beyond the gate when a driver is backing or driving out, they will be easily hit or much
worse killed. I also worry that our fence and cars that I park in my driveway will be at risk with
such little clearance. We have discussed this with friends that live on Wooddale Ave and Drexel
who have a shared or common driveway with their neighbors. All of them voice concerns about
safety and inconvenience.
4.) After a recent visit to city hall, I was informed that the Edina City Engineer requires that any
owner who intends to "cut" into the city sidewalk and or sewer and drain lines needs to obtain
approval from the City. As you know, the entire Country Club District is undergoing major
reconstruction to it's storm sewer drain and water systems. The street in front of 4622 Drexel is
one of the most dramatic problem areas in the neighborhood. The drain in front of 4622 Drexel is
the only source for storm and rain water drainage on the south end of the block. If a driveway
variance is granted, this could mean more problems for the homes on Drexel near the south end
of the block because a new south facing driveway at 4622 Drexel must "cut" into the drain area.
In other words, the main drain for the south end of the block will be in the dead center of this new
driveway located at the street entrance.
5.) The Edina Country Club Historical Preservation Board should know that the changes that
need to be made to create a south facing driveway could affect the integrity of the historical
homes around it. If the builder decides to take down his chimney as one Camelot worker recently
explained to me, it will change the look of the house and potentially the integrity of the
neighborhood as most homes in Country Club maintain chimneys.
For a driveway to look aesthetically correct at 4622 Drexel, the front hill will need to be
dramatically landscaped. The hill currently is 30" to 40" inches higher than my existing driveway.
In order for the builder to make a south facing driveway, he would have to landscape his hill by
that much to create a driveway level to mine. There do not appear to be too many options in the
front of the property. A few that come to the mind of one local landscape designer are:
A.) The builder needs to construct a high retaining wall on the northern edge of the new driveway.
It will need to span roughly 30' from the house down to the street. This is a safety concern
because it exposes many children in the neighborhood -- especially mine, to a potential 3' to 4'
drop straight down onto a cement driveway for a span of 30'.
B.) The entire front yard would need to be landscaped in such a way that the properties'
foundation would be either completely exposed down 3' below grade or another large east (street
) facing retaining wall will be need to be created in the front yard. The elevation of this wall would
be another safety concern for kids.
My letter may seem like I wish to stand in the way of someone's development. It's not that at all. I
simply do not want to be part of a driveway project that jeopardizes my children's safety and
diminishes my property value. The City of Edina's application for a variance states that the
variance should "not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in
the vicinity or zoning district". I believe this variance request diminishes my property value
because most people don't want to share a driveway with their neighbor. I also believe the
variance request puts my children at risk as a new driveway will provide virtually no clearance for
the driver to maneuver around my fence or parked cars.
According to the website that Camelot Construction subscribes to www. contractors.com, they
build single family homes but specialize in "mobile home repairs and moving." This group
clearly has no experience building Country Club homes in Edina, MN. I do not think that the City
of Edina can necessarily dictate who gets a building permit but it seems like experience should
matter somewhat on this request.
hope to attend the hearing on April 6, 2006 at 5:30 p.m.. I can certainly answer any questions
that you have in advance of the meeting. Please indicate that you have received my letter and
understand my request. Thank you for your attention.
Sincerely,
Daniel J. Delianedis
cc: C. Larsen, W. Houle
Hard copy will follow in mail.
Christopher & Annie O'Brien
4627 Drexel Avenue
Edina, MN 55424
March 28, 2006
Ms. Jackie Hoogenakker
Edina City Hall
Dear Ms. Hoogenakker,
I have received, the notice of public hearing for the zoning board's case
file B -06 -18 regarding the property at 4622 Drexel Avenue.
We do not support granting a width variance in this case for the following
reasons:
• Most all of the homes in our section of the street have single
driveways on the same side of each house. I understand this
variance would be used to build a driveway adjacent to their
neighbor's driveway at 4624 Drexel. Having a double driveway
like that would be aesthetically displeasing.
• It is not in keeping with the character of the rest of the houses.
• 1 do not particularly want to look out at wider stretches of
concrete.
• It seems unnecessary with the current structure of the home
• It seems unfair to their immediate neighbors at 4624 who may not
want to have a double driveway and who could not have
foreseen something like this happening when they made their
decision to purchase.
• The ordinance was put in place for a reason. Most likely to
protect the feel and character of the neighborhood.
Thank you for allowing us this opportunity.
Is it also possible to receive any information on the rest of the plans for
that property if there are large revisions planned? I am increasingly
concerned about recent projects and protecting the historic character
of the neighborhood
Thanks again,
Chris & Annie O'Brien
Annie.obrien @earthlink.net
.i,
T •d
I)onald and Sharon bleischmann
4621 Drexel Avenue
Edina, Minnesota 55424
952- 920 -7118
We own the: property across the street frorn the property 4622 Drexel Avenue requesting
die driveway "width" variance. We received notice from the City of Edina as we am
within 200 li e L Much to our surprise, not only is there a width variance, but the driveway
will actually be relocate.-d. We strongly oppose the approval of this variance in its
entirely. We are currently out of town as the F.dina schools are on spring break or we
would attend the meeting April 6th and rurther a:cplain our objections.
Edina C outatry Club is .4trUg ling with the whole issue of redevelopment and tear downs.
The Mayor and City Council are currently ,studying this issue. We are asking the Board of
Appeal~ not to consider the re-quested driveway variance in isolation without looking at
the bigger picture. It is not "merely a mutter of inches" as 1 was told by Kris Aaker.
Clearly we are not alone in our belierthat "smart development" must be balanced with
the needs orthe neighixirhood in which it takes place. As residents our concerns are
many. The tiact that the city planning department xtaf thinks this driveway issue "is no
big deal" in outrageous. It is a "bid; deal" to us a.Is we live there and will have to live with
the outcome or this decision.
The Roard of Appeals should not look merely at the width of the driveway in isolation,
as l.he pet.it.ioncr its actually - sking rt.)r the driveway to be moved from the north side of
the property to the south side; to build a detached gurage in the rear of the property. This
goal can he achieved without a variance. I realize after talking with Joyce Repya that the
1-11-113 wunts to sce: the tuck tinder garage removed and this can be achieved by simply
building the detached garage on the north side without putting undue hardship on any of
the neighbor~.
'17x: new curb extension needed would allow parking at the rear of our driveway severely
limiting our ability to exit our driveway. It is impossible to get a full sine vehicle out
when cars are parked directly behind our drive -way. This creates a hardship for us and to
our guests.
Our objectimui are fanny.
1.) The: property presents no "undue hardship ". '171e only hardship is economic for
C'sunelot Construction. '17se property can be developed with no variance and still achieve
the 1 111115 desire to sex; the ruck under garage removed.
2.) No current south elevations are on file with the planning department when 1 reviewer
the plaris on file as required by the variance request. 77te chimney will be removed but it
is unclear whim the south elevation will look like.
446T T *9 T99
• -+r JanaQ • o Bawer dS T t eo 90 So Jdd
Rpr 05 06 O3:15p James C. Dever Jr. 561 641 1944 p.2
ja�i�:►8�xt1101yarl•
sl�hddV.lo Iu*euEl :,Cdo:)
��� � 7y^"`� •�ovrU ���s7,
uuctuulaslal:l PleUO(1 pun uo .M4S
-Iuowwoo n1 �C1urnljoddo atll joJ noA Xun4.1.
-p pap 09 isnuj 2jujaJ04i puV pasodtul Jlac to d14spJt:4 slgl ta41 Janv
CCU gpads aM ,; "uaguaAuv2kt a low n jo pasodun flax 1ou sl 4014m dt4spjnq atipctn
putt anal10W. 11w► aoususn aL1 Teti ajtnb u tmauuulpj() nu1P;1 pun salnlmti t.10%-+uttl W
•scaualnudtmdde j0j tuaauc»
spoogjog48lau aqi AjspW pue ilns u auit:
April 2, 2006
To The City of Edina Zoning Board:
We are writing in response to the request for a variance for the property at 4622 Drexel Avenue.
Our home is 4623 Drexel Avenue which is directly across the street from this property. We have
had construction on all immediately adjacent sides of us for the almost four years we have lived
here, most of which have had variances, and we have not opposed any of them. We are very
much against the building of a driveway adjacent to 4624 Drexel for several reasons.
The most important reason is safety. The grade of the hill the driveway would be on is very
steep. In surveying all the driveways in the Country Club neighborhood we found only one
adjacent driveway with this steep of grade and that had at least 6 inches of "neutral cement"
separating the two driveways. Safety is an issue with any adjacent driveway situation, however
when it is on as steep a hill as this the situation is much worse. It's very difficult to see children
when backing out down a hill.
It is also our understanding that the proposal is to make the driveway a half a foot narrower than
code. It is very difficult to get a full size car into most of these driveways without driving onto
the grass much of the time and it would be impossible to do so in one smaller than code,
especially if there are cars parked in the other driveway. This of course assumes the driveways
are on the same level. If they were on different levels with the one at 4622 being narrower it
would be very treacherous to use that driveway at all. If they are on the same level then an
adjacent driveway quickly becomes a shared driveway out of necessity for the future owners of
4622.
The other major concern we have is the storm sewer drain which would need to be moved to the
street from the curb. We have the storm drain in the street at the end of our driveway and the
street floods all of the time due to that getting blocked with debris. The flooding would be much
worse if both the storm drains were in the street. At least now the one in the curb can't get
blocked.
Finally, on a personal note, we would never buy a home with an adjacent driveway. We have
friends who moved from a home in Country Club with an adjacent driveway cited as one of the
reasons. We would be very disappointed with the workings of this city if they forced a veteran
property owner to decrease the value of their home and compromise the safety of their children
and others in the neighborhood for the convenience of a construction company.
Thank you for your consideration of this letter.
Sincerely,
Shannon Neale and William Richards
4623 Drexel Avenue, Edina
i
-4. -- ___
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
Mayor & City Council
Agenda Item: II. A.
From:
Planning Department
Consent ❑
Kris Aaker, Assistant Planner
Information Only ❑
Date:
June 20, 2006
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
®
To Council
Subject:
Action: ®
Motion
Appeal of Denial of Variance
❑
Resolution
Robert Miller, 4622 Drexel Ave
❑
Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Recommendation:
Info /Background:
Robert Miller, owner of the property located at 4622 Drexel Ave., is appealing the
May 4, 2006, Zoning Board of Appeals denial of his driveway width variance application
to allow the removal and relocation of his existing driveway south of the home to access
a detached garage to be constructed in the rear yard. The Zoning Board of Appeals
heard driveway width variance requests for the property on April 6, 2006 and on May 4,
2006. Each was a separate application to the board. The first request was to allow an
11 1/2 ft driveway width and the second request was to allow a 10 1/2 ft driveway width
along the south side of the home. The ordinance requires a minimum width of 12 ft for
newly constructed driveways.
The property owner is hoping to in -fill the existing front loading garage with living
space, add onto the back of the home and construct a new detached garage in the rear
yard. All aspects of the plan conform to the ordinance requirements with the exception
of the driveway width. The first variance application was to allow a driveway width of
approximately 11 1/2 ft. The driveway would have extended up to the south lot line and
would have abutted the neighbor's driveway to the south. There were three members
present at the April 6, 2006, Zoning Board meeting. Two of the members voted to deny
and one of the members voted in favor of the request. Michael Fischer, one of the
Zoning Board members who voted against the proposal stated his "no" vote was
supportive of a driveway width variance. Mr. Fischer stated that he could support a
greater variance and a narrower driveway that would be more in- keeping with other
driveways in the neighborhood. The Zoning Board cannot act to allow a variance that is
greater than notified for so a re- application for a narrower driveway than proposed was
required.
The property owner re- applied for a driveway width variance to allow a driveway
width of 10 '/2 ft. The Zoning Board of Appeals heard the homeowners request for a 1 '/2
ft driveway width variance that would allow for a 10 1/2 ft wide driveway with an 18 inch
planting strip along the south side of the new driveway on May 4, 2006. There were four
members present at the hearing. Two members voted in favor of the motion to approve
the. request and two members voted against the requested variance. The motion was
denied due to lack of majority.
The property owner is appealing the May 4, 2006, denial of the Zoning Board of
Appeal denial of a 1 '/2 ft driveway width variance to allow a driveway width of 10'/2 ft.
June 7, 2006 City of Edina
Camelot Construction
15472 Filmore Street
Elk River, MN 55330
Re: 4622 Drexel Ave., Edina, MN case file B- 06 -24.
Dear Mr. Miller,
The Edina City Council at their meeting of June 6, 2006, granted a 60 -day
extension of your variance application B- 06 -24, 4622 Drexel Ave. for a driveway
width variance. The action was necessary to extend the 60 -day time limit for
taking action on your variance application. The City Council extended the
application for an additional 60 days in order for the Council to hear and consider
your appeal of the variance denial. The appeal will be heard on Tuesday, June
20, 2006 at 7:00 in the Edina Council Chambers, Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th
St. If you should have any questions please contact me at your earliest
convenience.
Sincerely,
wv
Kris Aaker
Assistant Planner
952 - 826 -0461
City Hall 952- 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390
EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 -826 -0379
Robert Miller
4622 Drexel Avenue
Edina, Minnesota
55424
City of Edina
Mayor and City Council Members
Care of: City Clerk
Re: Appeal to City Council
4622 Drexel Avenue South Hardship Variance
Steep Drive in front of garage
5 -15 -06
I am requesting a hearing to appeal the decision of the Zoning board
regarding the request for hardship on the steep slope in front of our
garage.
I would like to relocate my driveway to the South side of my property,
and build a detached garage in the back yard, with a safely sloped
area in front of it, to avoid slips, falls, and vehicles sliding across the
public sidewalk and into the street.
The votes on the first variance meeting would approve the request
with the driveway width change from 12 to 10 feet, and the second
meeting was a 2/2 vote with the revision as requested by Michael
Fischer of the Zoning Board.
Thank you for your time on this matter,
Robert Miller, Owner
KA
S� G\
2006
O
MEMORANDUM
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF EDINA
DATE: March 29, 2006 (revised June 16, 2006)
TO: Kris Aaker - Assistant Planner
FROM: Wayne Houle - City Engineer 01-
C: Joyce Repya - Associate Planner
Roger Glanzer - Utility Superintendent
Engineering Curb Cut Permit File
SUBJECT: Curb cut request for 4622 Drexel Avenue
Engineering has reviewed the above request to move the existing curb cut located along the
northerly property line to the southerly property line. After reviewing City Code Section 1205,
1 do not object to this curb cut relocation. I understand that Associate Planner - Joyce Repya,
staff liaison with the Heritage Preservation Board, also does not object to this curb cut
relocation.
Engineering requires that the applicant re- establish the existing curb cut with the proper
concrete curb and gutter, boulevard area, and new sidewalk as part of the curb cut permit.
The applicant shall also contact Roger Glanzer - Edna Utility Superintendent to perform an
inspection of the catch basin that is located in the proposed curb cut location. The new catch
basin casting along with any other upgrades to the catch basin will also be at the applicant's
expense.
Engineering also requires that the applicant add a concrete curb (4 -6" curb) along the
southerly edge of the proposed driveway. This curb will retain the surface drainage
from and to 4622 Drexel Avenue. Staff would also suggest that the drive be sloped to
the north from the house to the sidewalk to prevent water from draining onto the
adjoining property.
Please contact me if you need additional information.
Thanks
BOARD MEETING MINUTES MAY 4, 2006
B -06 -23 Camelot Construction
4622 Drexel Avenue
Request: Driveway Width Variance
Ms. Aaker informed the Board the property owners of 4622 Drexel Ave.
So. have applied for a 1 Y2 ft driveway width variance to allow access into the
rear yard of their,property for the construction of a detached two car garage. The
proposed driveway will be 10 Y2 ft in width. The Zoning Ordinance requires new
driveways to be 12 ft in width.
Ms. Aaker explained to the Board on April 6, 2006, the property owners
requested a similar variance for the driveway width from the Zoning Board of .
Appeals. The request was for a 6 inch variance to allow for a driveway width of
11 Y2 ft. There were three members present at the hearing. The 11 Y2 ft driveway
width variance was denied by a 2 -1 vote. Two of the members felt a driveway
width variance would be appropriate however; one of the members supporting a
driveway width variance voted to deny because in his opinion the driveway
should be constructed less than 11 1/2 ft in width as requested. The Board
member believed the driveway width should be similar in width to others in the
neighborhood, (8 -10 ft in width) and to allow spacing between the subject
driveway and the driveway to the south. One Board member supported the
request as submitted and the third felt there was no undue hardship present in
support of a variance approval.
Ms. Aaker concluded the homeowner has re- applied for a driveway width
variance narrower than originally requested at the suggestion of one of the
Zoning Board members. The new driveway will have a "stepped" retaining wall
along the north side and will be at the same grade as the neighbor's driveway to
the south. There will be an 18 ft planting strip between the subject driveway and
the driveway to the south. The proposed 10 Y2 ft wide driveway will still be wider
than many of the driveways that currently exist on the block and within the
Country Club District.
Mr. Samuelson representative for the proponents, Mr. Hoffman and Mr.
Miller was present to respond to questions from the Board. Interested neighbors
were also present.
Mrs. Utne asked Ms. Aaker to clarify the request. Ms. Aaker told the
Board the proponent is requesting a variance from the City's driveway width
requirement of 12 feet. Ms. Aaker explained this request was previously heard
by another Board and the request was denied with a 2 -1 vote. The request failed
because one of the Zoning Board members felt that the requested driveway
width of 11.6" was too wide for the neighborhood and suggested that the
proponents return to a Board with a proposal for a driveway less wide. The
Board Member indicated he would have supported the variance request if the
width of the driveway was reduced.
Mrs. Scherer said as she reviewed packet materials she observed another
issue that was mentioned is the slope of the proposed new driveway is reduced,
creating a safer driveway. Ms. Aaker responded that is correct. The new
driveway will be relocated to the south side of the lot and constructed at a lesser
grade.
Mr. Samuelson addressed the Board and informed them he is
representing Matt Hoffman the proponent. With graphics he pointed out the
existing driveway pitch and the pitch of the proposed new driveway. Mr.
Samuelson noted the proposed driveway pitch has almost a 50% reduction. He
added the proponent has two young children and it is very important to him that
the driveway is constructed at a grade less steep. Mr. Samuelson said a concern
mentioned at the previous meeting was the height of the proposed retaining wall.
Mr. Samuelson said after careful review the retaining wall was redesigned and
now will be terraced reducing the height of the wall in increments. Continuing,
Mr. Samuelson said the plan before the Board this evening is at the suggestion
of Mike Fischer, Zoning Board Member who at the last meeting suggested
reducing the width of the driveway. Mr. Samuelson said Mr. Fischer felt a
driveway width of over 11 feet was out of character in the Country Club
neighborhood since most of the driveway widths in the district are considerably
less. Mr. Samuelson asked the Board to note the reduction in driveway width
and the proposed "strip of land" between the subject driveway and the abutting
driveway. Concluding, Mr. Samuelson said in his opinion the reduction in
driveway slope and retaining wall height is an important improvement to the lot.
He also added the renovation of the home and the construction and placement of
the garage in the rear yard vs. the existing "tuck under" situation is of benefit to
the District and more in keeping with the look and feel of the Country Club
neighborhood.
Mr. Delcinedes, 4624 Drexel Avenue, told the Board his driveway is at
least as steep as the subject driveway, adding he spoke with the previous owner,
Mr. Fulton and Mr. Fulton indicated to him his vehicles never "slid down" the
driveway. Mr. Delcinedes said the Country Club neighborhood consists of 554
homes, adding in his opinion no one would want to share a driveway if they didn't
have too. Continuing, Mr. Delcinedes said he spoke with a realtor, Mr.
McDonnell who informed him if the driveway was moved from north to south the
new driveway location would have a negative impact on his property values. Mr.
Delcinedes told the Board Mr. McDonnell indicated his willingness to testify to
that fact. With photos Mr. Delcinedes pointed out to the Board there are a
number of homes (over 40) in the District with "tuck under" garages, adding at
the previous meeting there was a statement indicating garages in the rear yard
are more in keeping with the district, and these photo's show that statement was
unfounded. Concluding, Mr. Delicinedes informed the Board in his neighborhood
there are 22 young children and the proposed driveway change would endanger
not only his children but the neighborhood children that go in and out of his yard.
Mrs. Vasaly asked Mr. Delcinedes the width of his driveway. Mr.
Delcinedes responded he believes his driveway is 8 feet in width. Mr.
Delcinedes reiterated he has a concern with safety, reiterating side -by -side
driveways pose a safety concern for children and a financial concern for his
property. He added he had a great relationship with the former neighbor and is
worried that a variance will be approved for a contractor (not a resident) coming
in to "flip" this house.
Mrs. Delcinedes, 4624 Drexel Avenue asked the Board to deny this
request. She stated the proponent hasn't been neighborly and with photos
shared with the Board pictures of neighborhood children sliding and
snowboarding down the proponent's driveway and yard. She pointed out the
proponent was remiss in shoveling their sidewalk and driveway, adding if the
driveway was shoveled a vehicle wouldn't slip.
Ms. Neale, 4623 Drexel told the Board a majority of neighbors object to
this request, adding there is no hardship to support the change in driveway
location, adding the proposed location is detrimental to the safety of the
neighborhood children. Ms. Neale pointed out a tree will be removed to
accommodate the new driveway and garage, and a catch basin will have to be
relocated. Continuing, Ms. Neale submitted to the Board a petition from
neighbors indicating their objection to the change in driveway location. Ms.
Neale asked the Board to reject this request pointing out the neighbors strongly
object to relocating the driveway and have unanimously rejected this request.
Ms. Jackson, 4604 Drexel Avenue stated the proposed change in
driveway places an undue hardship on the Delcinedes property. The Delcinedes
should not have a driveway next to theirs which would create an unsafe situation.
Ms. Herman, 4602 Drexel told the Board she lives in a house with a
shared driveway, adding in her opinion it isn't desirable. Ms. Herman said the
proposed "strip" of grass between drives, in her opinion, looks awful.
Mrs. Scherer asked Ms. Aaker if all the driveways along Drexel have their
driveways on the north side. Ms. Aaker responded at least in the immediate area
it appears the majority of the homes have the driveway on the north, however,
there are homes on the block that share a drive, with some driveways located on
the south side.
Mrs. Vasaly asked for clarification on the reduction in the slope of the
driveway. She said her main concern is with the slope of the driveway, adding
she wants some assurance the slope of the proposed driveway will be reduced if
this request is approved and the driveway relocated. Mr. Samuelson said the
grade of the existing driveway ranges from 887 at the street to 893.22 at the top
of the drive or a pitch of 8.43. The new driveway pitch is proposed at around
4.82 or roughly almost a 50% reduction. Mrs. Vasaly said she wanted to make
sure the new driveway doesn't have such a steep slope, adding she believes the
slope of the existing driveway presents a hardship and is unsafe.
Mrs. Vasaly moved to approve the request for a driveway width variance
noting the reduction in driveway slope is positive. Mrs. Scherer seconded the
motion for the purpose of discussion.
Mr. Schwartzbauer stated in his opinion there isn't enough room for two
driveways in that location. Mr. Schwartzbauer acknowledged the attractiveness
of the proposed remodel; however, he believes an attractive home could be
constructed leaving the driveway exactly where it is. Mr. Schwartzbauer said he
also feels a shared driveway situation is unsafe.
Mrs. Scherer said she believes the house redesign is good, but cannot be
persuaded to approve this variance. She added in her opinion keeping the
driveway on the north side of the property is consistent with driveway placement
in this immediate neighborhood.
Mrs. Vasaly stated she supports the variance. She added she believes
the steep grade of the driveway poses a safety issue; she also observed the
relocation of the driveway was reviewed by both the City Engineer and Staff
Liaison to the Heritage Preservation Board. Mrs. Vasaly also noted the majority
of driveways in the District are not 12 feet in width, they are less. Concluding,
Mrs. Vasaly said the photo's the Board viewed this evening with children using
the subject property and subject driveway to sled and snowboard confirms in her
mind reducing the slope of the driveway is an improvement which addresses the
safety issue.
Chair Utne told the Board she supports the request. She said what the
Board is considering at this time is a variance for driveway width, reiterating she
supports the variance as presented, adding it is important to note the majority of
the driveways in the Country Club District are not 12 feet wide, and "holding" this
property to the Code would be a hardship.
Chair Utne called the vote; Ayes; Vasaly, Utne. Nays; Schwartzbauer,
Scherer. Motion failed.
Chair Utne informed Mr. Samuelson the Board's decision can be appealed
to the City Council.
_ r
1
LOCATION MAP
. arrA ST
B -06 -23
DRIVEWAY WIDTH
8
DDUNTW CLUB ND
ECKMACT
PID: 1802824130010
4622 Drexel Ave
Edina, MN 55424
e 4, .I
E?
Legend
HObb9hied Faabua
Sbaal Nano Labot
N %4uncpal Boundary
,A/ Geab
OLakes
p Peru
❑ Pamok
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 4, 2006
TO: Zoning Board of Appeals
FROM: Kris Aaker, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: 462? Drexel Ave. So., Driveway width variance
The property owners of 4622 Drexel Ave. So. have applied for a 1 Y2 ft driveway
width variance to allow access into the rear yard of their property for the
construction of a detached two car garage. The proposed driveway will be 10'/2 ft
in width. The Zoning Ordinance requires new driveways to be 12 ft in width.
On April 6, 2006, the property owners requested a similar variance for the
driveway width from the Zoning Board of Appeals. The request was for a 6 inch
variance to allow for a driveway width of 11 '/2 ft. There were three members
present at the hearing. The 11 %2 ft driveway width variance was denied by a 2 -1
vote. Two of the members felt a driveway width variance would be appropriate
however; one of the members supporting a driveway change voted for denial
because it was the Board member's opinion the driveway should be less than 11
1/2 ft as requested. The Board member believed the driveway width should be
similar in width to others in the neighborhood, (8 -10 ft in width), to allow spacing
between the subject driveway and the driveway to the south. One Board member
supported the request as submitted and the third felt there is no undue hardship
present in support of a variance approval.
The homeowner has re- applied for a driveway width variance narrower than
originally requested at the suggestion of one of the Zoning Board members. The
new driveway will have a "stepped" retaining wall along the north side and will be
at the same grade as the neighbor's driveway to the south. There will be an 18 ft
planting strip between the subject driveway and the driveway to the south. The
proposed 10'/2 ft wide driveway will still be wider than many of the driveways that
currently exist on the block and within the Country Club District.
Attached for reference are the following materials:
Original site plans.
Staff report
Minutes of the April 6, 2006 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals.
�5YA
CASE NUMBER *.a
DATE 22-5
FEE PAID On W
Planning Department
4801 West Fiftieth Street * Edina, MN 55424 * (952) 826 -0369 FAX (952) 826 -0389
APPLICATION FOR: VARIANCE /FEE RES. $200 /NON -RES. $400
APPLICANT:
NAME:
ADDRESS /ZIP:15V.) ffAywre SA- wo-3 s-s33,0 PHONE10.0 17-(9 7�
PROPERTY OWNER:
NAME: F&*e 1 Y�n1le2
ADDRESS /ZIP:q�D,z) 172Eti �/ ss�lzK PHONE:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: L-i'12. L P Mal
PROPERTY ADDRESS: SDanEL i}var
PRESENT ZONING: F-3 P.I.D.# 19 —0-P-$ -;�q' /3 °o/ U
EXPLANATION OF REQUEST: 17KluG�w4Y
(Use reverse side or additional pages if necessary)
ARCHITECT: NAMEDALAp PHONE: U —M8
SURVEYOR: NAME6,1(zv jP& t ? s--,&nPHONE: -zv�-O — �2 ,149 g
G Cv G (&%
pplica t Signatu a (Date)
Property ner's Signatur (Date)
Zoning Board Application .............Page 2
Minnesota Statutes and Edina ordinances require that the
following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively.
The proposed variance will:
Relieve an undue hardship which was not self imposed or a
mere inconvenience.
Yes - The existing slope of the driveway is extremely dangerous.
Cars, parked in the driveway during slippery conditions, slide down
the driveway, across the sidewalk, and into the street.
Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property,
but not applicable to other property, in the vicinity or zoning
district.
Yes — See same answer above
Preserve a substantial property right possessed by other
property in the vicinity and zoning district.
Yes - To bring property into alignment with original Country Club
Historical preservation, which stated no garages facing the street in
front of house.
Not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
other property in the vicinity or zoning district.
Yes - Extensive remodel and addition improves the property value in
the neighborhood, and brings it in alignment with the surrounding
homes and neighborhood.
City of Edina
May 4, 2006
Camelot Construction
15472 Filmore Street
Elk River, MN 55330
Re: 4622 Drexel Avenue, Edina, MN - B -06 -24 — a driveway width variance for
4622 Drexel Avenue, Edina, MN
Dear Mr. Miller:
In connection with your recent request for a driveway width variance, which was heard by
the Edina Zoning Board on Thursday, May 4, 2006, may we advise you that same has
been denied.
If you wish to appeal the decision of the Zoning Board to the Edina City Council, a letter of
intent must be submitted to the City Clerk no later than May 14, 2006.
If you have further questions on this matter, please feel free to contact me at
952 - 826 -0465.
Sincerely,
Jackie Hoogenakker
Zoning Board of Appeals
h
City Hall
4801 WEST 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394
www.cityofedina.com
952 - 927 -8861
FAX 952- 826 -0390
TTY 952 - 826 -0379
Edina City Council
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
To Whom It May Concern:
This is a letter of support for Robert Miller, owner of the home at 4622 Drexel Avenue
South. Plans for a much - needed, extensive renovation of the home designated above are
in place pending approval and we wish to state our approval of these plans.
Our home is located just next door to the home in question, on the lot to the north, at
20 rte,. n___.t.. t. i:._.._._t. addition d
�1)GV iJLGXGI NVCI7UC JuUlll, aj7d we recently uiiUfa IUVn 8 inzlsSlVG Qddi.;v,l uitu exterior
renovation on it. We.purchased the home in 1985 -86 and have worked to bring it up to
the neighborhood standard ever since, so we thoroughly understand Mr. Miller's desire to
do the same. Both houses were /are candidates for this type of improvement.
We are particularly pleased to note that Mr. Miller is planning on relocating the driveway.
The current one is on an uphill slope which makes it very treacherous during the winter.
Cars cannot be parked at that time safely and have, in the past, slid back down into the
street. Walking on it during the winter is dangerous as well. Under the winter conditions
Minnesota provides, it's almost impossible to keep it clear, ice -free, and consequently
safe for all who use it. The plans for the driveway change appear to solve those
problems. In addition, we are delighted with the architectural ideas and changes that Mr.
Miller proposes for the home's exterior. The home has needed work for many years and
these architectural plans will improve and enhance the home greatly, producing an eye
pleasing result which will be much more in keeping with the existing homes in the
Country Club neighborhood. It has to be wonderful for all of the surrounding neighbors
that both of these homes, side by side, will not only improve the value of the homes on
Drexel, but be pleasant to look at as well.
In ciosing, we extend our thanks to the City Council iur considering all of file requests put
forth by Mr. Miller, and offer our approval and support for what he wishes to accomplish.
We voice no objections to Mr. Miller's intentions for the home and are looking forward
to having him and his family as our neighbors. Thank you for your time and
consideration.
Yours very truly,
Wayne and Anne Whitman
Jackie Hoogenakker
From: Kelly Jackson Backson4626 @mac.comj
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 2:04 PM
To: Jackie Hoogenakker
Cc: Christina Delianidis
Subject: 4622 Drexel Avenue variance appeal
Ms. Hoogenakker,
The purpose of this message is to restate our opposition to the lot width variance request for the property located at
4622 Drexel Avenue in Edina. The original letter containing our concerns, dated March 29, 2006 is included below.
Please forward this message to City Council members Scot Housh, Alice Hulbert, Linda Masica and Ann Swenson.
We regret we will be unable to attend the June 20 meeting; we hope you will consider our concerns when making your
decision.
Thank you, again, for your consideration,
Kelly and Jamie Jackson
4626 Drexel Avenue, Edina
Begin forwarded message:
From: Kelly Jackson <jackson462_@mac.com>
Date: March 29, 2006 3:12:03 PM CST
To: jhoo,genakker @ci.e0ina_mn.us
Cc: Christina Delianidis <CiscoandClint@aol.com>
Subject: 4622 Drexel Avenue
To Whom it May Concern,
This letter is in regard to the proposed Driveway Width Variance requested for the above captioned
property. As Property Owners Within 200 Feet, we have the following concerns about the proposed
change:
1.) The variance suggests a change in the appearance of the property. Although we realize homes in the
neighborhood can, and should, be maintained and improved, it should be done in a manner that maintains
the historical and aesthetic integrity of the neighborhood. Inasmuch as there have been recent projects that
have not met that criteria, we are concerned about any proposed changes.
2.) There are many young children on our block, including our three, who spend much of their outside
time playing in the front yards of the neighborhood; they often run between each others' yards. We are
concerned that any proposed changes to the driveway may impede driver visibility and compromise the
safety of our children.
3.) As a general comment, we know from past personal experience that it is not desirable to have
adjacent/abutting driveways. A "shared" driveway makes it difficult to take full advantage of one's
property in terms of parking, playing, etc.
We regret we will be unable to attend the Zoning Board hearing on April 6; we hope this letter clearly
communicates our concerns.
Thank you for your consideration,
Kelly and Jamie Jackson
DREXEL AVENUE PETITION OPPOSING CASE FILE B -06 -23
VARIANCE APPLICATION FOR 4622 DREXEL AVENUE
1.5' DRIVEWAY WIDTH VARIANCE AND ADJACENT
PROPERTY /NEW CURB CUT /DRIVEWAY RELOCATED
NAME SIGNATURE PROPERTY OWNER DATE
16. Q n �) 513ni,
s wtsSc«kso� 6 � J'� • � i v� �i_�
18 e,�-,
25.
GRoa ST
H I=
7.
LOCATION MAP
GUUN7RV CLUB tm
E VINA Cf
B -06 -18
4622 DREXEL AVENUE
VARIANCE
PI13:1802824130010
Edina, MN 55424
g
s
Legend
Ffphtghted Feature
Street Warne Label*
64unicgal Boundary
�✓ Creeks
0 Lakes
pParks
Parcel*
vu
EDINA ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
STAFF REPORT
APRIL 6, 2006
B -06 -18 Camelot Construction /Robert J Miller
4622 Drexel Ave. So.
Lot 12, Block 7, Country Club
Zoning: R -1
Request: Driveway width variance
Background
The subject property is located on the west side of Drexel Ave. consisting of a
two story home with a front loading, two car garage. The property owner is
planning to remodel and add onto the house. The plan will include removing the
existing driveway and curb cut, converting the existing garage into living space,
adding to the back of the home on both the first and second floors and
constructing a new detached garage in the rear yard. The new detached garage
would be accessed by a new driveway installed along the south side of the
property. All aspects of the project conform to the ordinance requirements with
the exception of the proposed driveway width along the south wall of the home.
The minimum width required for newly constructed driveway is 12 ft. The
property owner is proposing a new driveway width of approximately 11 1/2 ft.
Issues /Analysis
The property is located in the historic Country Club District. All new structures,
including the proposed garage, require a Certificate of Appropriateness through
the Heritage Preservation Board. The new garage structure will be reviewed by
the Heritage Preservation Board if a detached garage in the rear yard is allowed
access by approval of the proposed driveway. The change in curb -cut and
driveway has been reviewed and deemed acceptable by both the City Engineer
and the Staff liaison to the Heritage Preservation Board, (see attached
memorandums). No Engineering or Heritage Preservation basis for denial was
identified for the curb cut location or driveway change.
The proposed driveway will be installed at the same grade as the adjacent
driveway to the south. A retaining wall will be installed along the north side of the
driveway on the subject property. A fire place chimney will be removed along the
south wall of the home to accommodate the new driveway. The south - facing
basement windows will have glass block installed with driveway asphalt to abut
the windows. No window wells are proposed along the south wall of the home.
The proposed driveway will not be a shared or common driveway with the
existing driveway to the south located on the 4224 Drexel property. There are no
cross easements proposed between properties.
There are many driveways in the Country Club District that are less than 12 ft in
I idth. The adjacent property to the south has a driveway width of 8 ft for most of
its length. Shared and abutting driveways and driveways widths less than 10 ft in
the Country Club are not uncommon.
Conclusion /Recommendation
The proposed request is minimal and will preserve a substantial property right
enjoyed by others in the Country Club District. Staff supports the request subject
to the plans presented.
CASE NUMBE IS
DATE
FEE PAID
Planning Department www ,cityotedir.a.com
4801 West Fiftieth Street * Edina, MN 55424 * (952) 826 -0369 FAX (952) 826 -0389
APPLICATION FOR: VARIANCEIFEE RES. $200 1NON -RES. $400
APPLICANT:
NAME: ulcr4 �'�►,r�S�{� 1v�C
ADDRESS1ZIP:(S'j7a FI,Mo�-. c7t C-i- r -2uwe2 55-330 PHONE: (01-- Y17-{0375
PROPERTY OWNER:
NAME: gzobea-+ p lle2
ADDRESS/ZIP: 46 x� - DaoxE1-- PHONE: Q 1 )-"3" AQS-
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: L-I- Iz uL1C
C: Tfel" 7r
PROPERTY ADDRESS: y6 >�L- 17(Ley r t- AVC-
PRESENT ZONING: Q .-3- P.I.D.# J D D° — Y y3 00/ C)
EXPLANATION OF REQUEST: -1 kI 4N CgF" 6r— D 2t u rc w 4y wl �nA
(Use reverse side or additional pages if necessary)
ARCHITECT: NAME:.NU 1j PHONE:
SURVEYOR: NAME:Su(ZueyirJL-(CozlNcei2i &'ic Pis,-,-- 1sPHONE:
Property 0 er's Signature ( ate) Applicants Vgna ture (Date)
Zoning Board Application .............Page 2
Minnesota Statutes and Edina ordinances require that the
following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively.
The proposed variance will:
Relieve an undue hardship which was not self imposed or a
mere inconvenience.
Yes - The existing slope of the driveway is extremely dangerous.
Cars, parked in the driveway during slippery conditions, slide down
the driveway, across the sidewalk, and into the street.
Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property,
but not applicable to other property, in the vicinity or zoning
district.
Yes — See same answer above
Preserve a substantial property right possessed by other
property in the vicinity and zoning district.
Yes - To bring property into alignment with original Country Club
Historical preservation, which stated no garages facing the street in
front of house.
Not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
other property in the vicinity or zoning district.
Yes - Extensive remodel and addition improves the property value in
the neighborhood, and brings it in alignment with the surrounding
homes and neighborhood.
City of Edina
April 7, 2006
Camelot Construction /Robert Miller
4622 Drexel Avenue
Edina, MN 55424
Re: B -06 -18 — a driveway width variance for 4622 Drexel Avenue, Edina, MN
Dear Mr. Miller:
In connection with your recent request for a driveway width variance, which was heard by
the Edina Zoning Board on Thursday, April 6, 2006, may we advise you that same has
been denied.
If you wish to appeal the decision of the Zoning Board to the Edina City Council, a letter of
intent must be submitted to the City Clerk no later than April 16, 2006.
If you have further questions on this matter, please feel free to contact me at
952 - 826 -0465.
Jackie Hoogenakker
Zoning Board of Appeals
h
City Hall
4801 WEST 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394
www.cityofedina.com
952 - 927 -8861
FAX 952 -826 -0390
TTY 952 -826 -0379
Zoning Board April 6, 2006 meeting minutes.
B -06 -18 Camelot Construction /Robert J Miller
4622 Drexel Ave. So.
Lot 12, Block 7, Country Club
Request: Driveway width variance
Ms. Aaker informed the Board the subject property is located on the west
side of Drexel Ave. consisting of a two story home with a front loading, two car
garage. The property owner is planning to remodel and add onto the house. The
plan will include removing the existing driveway and curb cut, converting the
existing garage into living space, adding to the back of the home on both the first
and second floors and constructing a new detached garage in the rear yard. The
new detached garage would be accessed by a new driveway installed along the
south side of the property. All aspects of the project conform to the ordinance
requirements with the exception of the proposed driveway width along the south
wall of the home. The minimum width required for newly constructed driveway is
12 ft. The property owner is proposing a new driveway width of approximately 11
1/2 ft.
Ms. Aaker explained the property is located in the historic Country Club
District. All new structures, including the proposed garage, require a Certificate of
Appropriateness through the Heritage Preservation Board. The new garage
structure will be reviewed by the Heritage Preservation Board if a detached
garage in the rear yard is allowed access by approval of the proposed driveway.
The change in curb -cut and driveway has been reviewed and deemed
acceptable by both the City Engineer and the Staff liaison to the Heritage
Preservation Board, (see attached memorandums). No Engineering or Heritage
Preservation basis for denial was identified for the curb cut location or driveway
change.
Ms. Aaker explained the proposed driveway will be installed at the same
grade as the adjacent driveway to the south. A retaining wall will be installed
along the north side of the driveway on the subject property. A fire place chimney
will be removed along the south wall of the home to accommodate the new
driveway. The south - facing basement windows will have glass block installed
with driveway asphalt to abut the windows. No window wells are proposed along
the south wall of the home. The proposed driveway will not be a shared or
common driveway with the existing driveway to the south located on the 4224
Drexel property. There are no cross easements proposed between properties.
Ms. Aaker asked the Board to note there are many driveways in the Country Club
District that are less than 12 ft in width. The adjacent property to the south has a
driveway width of 8 ft for most of its length. Shared and abutting driveways and
driveways widths less than 10 ft in the Country Club are not uncommon.
Ms. Aaker concluded the proposed request is minimal and will preserve a
substantial property right enjoyed by others in the Country Club District. Staff
supports the request subject to the plans presented.
The proponents, Mr. Miller and Mr. Hoffman were present to respond to
questions. Interested neighbors were also present.
Chair Schwartzbauer noted the packet contained a letter from a neighbor
suggesting that the driveway continue to be located along the north property line
to access the new garage. Chair Schwartzbauer asked if that was ever
considered. Ms. Aaker responded if one looks at the spacing on that side of the
house it would be very difficult to place a driveway in that location.
Mrs. Vasaly said the proponent indicated the slope of the driveway
presents a danger during winter months because of the potential for vehicles to
"slip down" the driveway unto the sidewalk or street. Ms. Aaker acknowledged
the driveway does slope, adding the City doesn't have a mechanism in place that
addresses driveway slope. Mrs. Vasaly commented if she read the plan correctly
the proposed driveway slope will be lessened as a result of this proposal. Ms.
Aaker responded that is correct the new driveway will improve the slope.
Mr. Fischer asked the applicant if the proposed driveway would be
concrete or asphalt. Mr. Fischer also observed it appears the adjacent
neighbor's driveway (to the south) is constructed right up to the common property
line. Ms. Aaker confirmed that statement. With regard to asphalt driveways Ms.
Aaker pointed out the majority of driveways in the Country Club area are
concrete, not asphalt. Continuing, Ms. Aaker told the Board if approved they can
stipulate the type of material used for the driveway.
Mr. Fischer commented the variance is for six inches, adding as he
viewed the Country Club neighborhood a driveway width of 12 feet appears
larger than most. Ms. Aaker responded that is correct a majority of driveways in
the District are between eight and ten feet.
Mr. Hoffman addressed the Board and told them he parked his vehicle in
the driveway this past winter and the vehicle slid down the driveway onto the
sidewalk. Continuing, Mr. Hoffman said he was surprised at the interest this
request generated especially with regard to the safety of children. Mr. Hoffman
said the safety of children, his and the neighboring children are of the utmost
importance. .
Mr. Delcinedes, 4624 Drexel Avenue (neighbor to the south) told the
Board he doesn't support the variance request. Mr. Delcinedes said the reason
the vehicle slid down the driveway was because the driveway wasn't shoveled.
Continuing, Mr. Delcinedes informed the Board in the immediate area there are
22 children and the proposed driveway endangers them. He added in his opinion
it is detrimental to have a driveway to driveway situation with a grade change.
Mr. Delcinedes questioned Mr. Hoffman if he ever constructed a home in the
Country Club District, adding when he heard the proposed driveway may be
constructed with asphalt he cringed.
Mrs. Vasaly said as she views the plans it appears the Delcinedes
driveway is only 8 feet in width. Mr. Delcinedes responded that is correct.
Mrs. Delcinedes told the Board during the past winter months there were
many times the driveway and sidewalk of the home at 4622 Drexel was not
shoveled. Continuing, Mrs. Delcinedes said she is very fearful for the safety of
her children, especially in light of the possibility of a shared driveway.
Mrs. Delcinedes said the neighborhood is very friendly and people spend a lot of
time visiting especially in their front yard areas. Mrs. Delcinedes said the change
in driveway location will not only negatively impact her family but will negatively
impact other properties in the immediate area. Concluding, Mrs. Delcinedes said
she has a fear one of her children could be injured exiting their car if the
neighbors are exiting their new driveway at the same time.
Ms. Herman, 4602 Drexel Avenue told the Board she has a shared
driveway and would rather not have one. She stated a shared driveway is not
desirable and the mass this will create will be unappealing.
Ms. Shannon Neale, 4623 Drexel Avenue, acknowledged there are shared
driveways in the area, but that doesn't mean they work well. Ms. Neale pointed
out many side by side driveways have space between them like a strip of
greenery. Continuing, Ms. Neale pointed out there is also a drain located at the
end of the subject driveway which is proposed to change. She said she is
worried that a change in the drain system could create the potential to flood.
Mrs. Vasaly questioned the drain system that will be changed. Mr.
Hoffman responded the City Engineer has reviewed their proposal and found no
problem with it, and supports it. Continuing, Mr. Hoffman said with regard to
asphalt vs. concrete it was never his intent to construct an asphalt driveway - it
will be concrete. Continuing, Mr. Hoffman said when he purchased his home it
needed a lot of work. He told the Board he met with City staff and was informed
of the Code with regard to driveway width, and applied for a variance. Mr.
Hoffman said he believes relocating the garage in the rear yard is more in
keeping with the area. Concluding, Mr. Hoffman acknowledged he never
constructed a home in the Country Club area of Edina, but does build a quality
home.
Mr. Fischer acknowledged the Code requires a driveway width of 12 feet,
but pointed out the Code is City wide and in certain areas of smaller lots a 12 foot
wide driveway doesn't make sense and in many cases a 12 foot driveway is
detrimental to the "look" of the neighborhood. Continuing, Mr. Fischer said he
believes this issue can be resolved, adding sometimes the best solution would be
to grant a greater variance. Mr. Fischer stated in his opinion a driveway width in
this area would be more aesthetically pleasing between 9 and 10 feet.
Ms. Aaker said she understands Mr. Fischer's point of view. She said
variances have been granted in the City's more "urban" areas for driveways
under 12 feet in width.
Mr. Fischer said the logic used to approach a variance should be to
achieve a better end result, adding in all honestly he doesn't feel a 12 foot
driveway is best for this lot and this neighborhood. Mr. Fischer said he is
encouraged by the fact there would be a turn - around area in the rear yard
enabling vehicles to enter the street front first, adding he believes the width of the
drive should be less and if approved the driveway should be concrete or pavers,
not asphalt.
Mrs. Vasaly said she would have a hard time denying this request. She
said she agrees the driveway would better serve the subject site and area if it
were constructed less than 12 feet, adding the Board can't force the proponent to
reduce the driveway width. Continuing, Mrs. Vasaly said if she read the site plan
correctly the current driveway is less than 12 feet in width. Mr. Hoffman said he
would have no problem reducing the width of the driveway.
Ms. Aaker said if the driveway width is reduced Mr. Hoffman would have
to re -apply for a variance because the plans presented this evening are what the
Board must act on.
Chair Schwartzbauer stated he can't support the variance as presented,
adding in his opinion there is no hardship. He added he just doesn't like the
proposed location of the new driveway.
Mrs. Vasaly moved variance approval noting a hardship exists on this lot,
the lot is non - conforming at 60 feet wide, adding a lot with this width cannot
accommodate a 12 foot driveway to meet code requirements. Mr. Fischer
seconded the motion.
Chair Schwartzbauer stated he is opposed to the motion and cannot
support the variance. He said in his opinion if this variance is granted it will alter
the surrounding area, reiterating in his opinion, there is no hardship.
Ayes, Vasaly. Nays, Schwartzbauer, Fischer. Motion denied.
Mr. Fischer explained his "No" vote is because he could support a
driveway width variance, but not this one. Mr. Fischer reiterated he could
support a greater variance. Mr. Fischer stated in his opinion there is a hardship
present to support the granting of a greater variance: A 12 foot or 11'6" driveway
is too wide for this neighborhood, and out of character.
Mrs. Vasaly also pointed out there is nothing in the Code prohibiting
driveways from abutting each other, or being relocated, adding in this
neighborhood there appears to be a number of side by side driveways with the
majority of the driveways less than 12 feet in width.
Mr. Fischer asked Ms. Aaker if the proponents can re -apply for a greater
variance. Ms. Aaker responded in the affirmative. Continuing, Mr. Fischer told
the proponents they can appeal the Board's decision to the City Council. Mr.
Fischer reiterated he believes a hardship exists on these smaller lots, adding he
could support a greater variance. He added a driveway width between 9 and 10
feet would make sense to him, and is more in keeping with the streetscape of the
Country Club neighborhood.
DATE: March 29,2006
MEMORANDUM
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF EDINA
TO: Kris Aaker — Assistant Planner
FROM: Wayne Houle — City Engineer
C: Joyce Repya — Associate Planner
Roger Glanzer — Utility Superintendent
Engineering Curb Cut Permit File
SUBJECT: Curb cut request for 4622 Drexel Avenue
Engineering has reviewed the above request to move the existing curb cut located along the
northerly property line to the southerly property line. After reviewing City Code Section 1205,
1 do not object to this curb cut relocation. I understand that Associate Planner - Joyce Repya,
staff liaison with the Heritage Preservation Board, also does not object to this curb cut
relocation.
Engineering requires that the applicant re- establish the existing curb cut with the proper
concrete curb and gutter, boulevard area, and new sidewalk as part of the curb cut permit.
The applicant shall also contact Roger Glanzer — Edna Utility Superintendent to perform an
inspection of the catch basin that is located in the proposed curb cut location. The new catch
basin casting along with any other upgrades to the catch basin will also be at the applicant's
expense.
Please contact me if you need additional information.
Thanks
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kris Aaker, Assistant Planner
FROM: Joyce Repya, Associate Planner
Heritage Preservation Board Staff
SUBJECT: New Curb Cut Applications in the Country
Club District
DATE: March 31, 2006
Because the Country Club District is designated an Edina Heritage Landmark District, I
review applications for new curb cuts in the District in addition to the Engineering
Department. The following elements are considered in the review:
When a new curb cut is created, the old curb cut must be removed.
New curb and gutter shall replace the old curb cut.
No boulevard trees shall be compromised by the new curb cut.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Zoning Board of Appeals and Adjustments
FROM: Joyce Repya, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Detached Garages in the Country Club District
DATE: April 6, 2006
When addressing new detached garages in the Country Club District, Heritage
Preservation Consultant Robert Vogel has advised the Heritage Preservation Board that
the Secretary of the Interior's standards for the treatment of historic properties recognizes
new construction as an appropriate undertaking providing the new construction is
compatible in size, scale, materials, color and texture with other buildings in the
neighborhood. Furthermore, detached garages are consistent with the historic pattern of
residential development in the Country Club District.
When reviewing plans for new detached garages in the Country Club District, in addition
to determining that the architectural style is compatible with the style of the home, the
Heritage Preservation Board also observes the following design guidelines:
• No detached garage should be taller, longer, or wider than the house.
• No detached garage should have a roofline taller than that of adjacent
homes.
Undecorated side walls longer than 16 feet should be avoided whenever
possible.
New garages should be differentiated from historic homes and clearly
identifiable as contemporary works.
The Heritage Preservation Board would consider a new detached garage in the rear yard
to be a positive for a property with a front loading garage because the vehicle parking and
storage would be moved from the front of the home into the rear yard.
Page 1 of 1
Kris Aaker
From: CiscoandClint @aol.com
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 10:33 PM
To: Kris Aaker; Steve Kirchman; Steve Lillehaug; Joyce Repya
Subject: Lot 12, Block7 Country Club
To Whom It May Concern,
I am forwarding a letter sent by my husband, Daniel Delianedis, on March 26, to Ms. Jackie Hoogenakker. All
of your names have been mentioned through other a -mails sent to us regarding a hearing for a driveway width
variance. The hearing is scheduled for Thursday, April 6, 2006.
The letter was sent to Jackie Hoogenakker because her name was listed on the notice as the contact person to
submit letters expressing oUr views. We do know a few neighbors have already sent her letters opposing the
variance. Another neighbor has spoken with Jim Hovland and corresponded with him through e-mail. We
anticipate more letters to follow. I do know the few neighbors that will be in town (due to Edina's spring break)
will be at the hearing.
I also want you to know that I am against this driveway width variance. My reasons are strictly from my heart
as a concerned mother. It may be a few inches to the board, but it is a life that I am worried about! 1 have
totaled the number of children that live within the 200 feet of this driveway - there are 22! The only way these
children are able to get out of the street when on a wagon, bike, skate board, stroller or roller skates, is through
all of our driveways. If you drive on Drexel in the morning before school, during the day and after school you
will notice all of the kids playing in our front yards. You must be aware that the traffic situation has increased
too. All of the 22 children are of elementary school age. In the winter months our children use the drives to
slide down. The street and driveways are a hazard to us all. This will only add to the congestion.
I hope and pray you will consider our concerns. I am not against the home being updated. I am against the
driveway width variance because of the use of our driveway. It will absolutely become a shared driveway
because of the closeness already. It will be a hazard to our children.
Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
Christina Delianedis
3/31/2006
Daniel J. Delianedis
4624 Drexel Avenue
Edina, MN 55424
952 - 922 -8121
March 26, 2006
.Ms. Jackie Hoogenakker
Edina City Hall Planning Commission
4801 West 50th Street,
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Ms. Hoogenaker,
My name is Daniel Delianedis. My family and 1 live at 4624 Drexel Avenue. We moved into our
home in July of 2001. 1 have a wife and two daughters ages ten and four. I believe that we are the
fourth family to own this property since 1934 when it was built. We love Edina, MN and love the
Country Club District.
As you might know, the property to the north of us at 4622 Drexel was purchased by a
construction company, Camelot Construction Inc., located at 19393 Upland St NW, Elk River,
MN in December 2005. 1 received your announcement March 25, that Camelot Construction and
Robert J Miller is requesting a driveway width variance.
The following reasons are why I oppose granting a driveway width variance to Camelot
Construction.
1.) It is my understanding that the Edina City Planning Commission requires that any variance
must be agreed to by homeowners within 200' of the dwelling requesting the variance. I do not
wish to permit the variance. We would never have purchased our home in 2001 if there were a
shared or common driveway between us and 4622 Drexel.
2.) It is furthermore my understanding that the Edina City Planning Commission requires that all
driveways have at least 12' of clearance from a single family dwelling to any neighboring
property. The south facing wall structure at 4622 Drexel is about 26' long . It has only 9'60 of
clearance from its' chimney to my property. There are also three south facing basement window
wells along the foundation. The distance from each window well to my property line is 10' 3 ".
There is 11'4" of clearance from the foundation to my property. This is just not enough
clearance according to the City of Edina's ordinance so again, I oppose granting a
driveway width variance.
3.) The most important reason for opposing the variance is the safety of my children and many
neighbors' children who often come to play at our house. The kids use our driveway to come and
go or when they take their bicycles and toys in and out. We have a fence that runs along the
back northern border of our property and across the driveway facing east. This fence has been
part of the property for more than 30 years. It allows us to keep our two dogs penned up and
keep a swing set for the kids.
If a variance were granted to build a driveway abutting ours, I worry about safety because the
new homeowners at 4622 Drexel will never be able see children at our fence gate (or adults for
that matter) as they drive out of their dwelling. The clearance from the rear window well to my
fence is 10' 3 ". If the property owner drove a Ford Explorer SUV (72" wide, 80" with rear view
mirrors extended) or a Ford Expedition (78" wide - -86" when you include mirrors) for example, the
driver will have only 37" of clearance. This means that they have 18 %" on either side of the
vehicle. There is therefore, no room for driver error. If a child, adult, or dog simply took one
step out beyond the gate when a driver is backing or driving out, they will be easily hit or much
worse killed. I also worry that our fence and cars that I park in my driveway will be at risk with
such little clearance. We have discussed this with friends that live on Wooddale Ave and Drexel
who have a shared or common driveway with their neighbors. All of them voice concerns about
safety and inconvenience.
4.) After a recent visit to city hall, I was informed that the Edina City Engineer requires that any
owner who intends to "cut" into the city sidewalk and or sewer and drain lines needs to obtain
I pproval from the City. As you know, the entire Country Club District is undergoing major
reconstruction to it's storm sewer drain and water systems. The street in front of 4622 Drexel is
one of the most dramatic problem areas in the neighborhood. The drain in front of 4622 Drexel is
the only source for storm and rain water drainage on the south end of the block. If a driveway
variance is granted, this could mean more problems for the homes on Drexel near the south end
of the block because a new south facing driveway at 4622 Drexel must cut" into the drain area.
In other words, the main drain for the south end of the block will be in the dead center of this new
driveway located at the street entrance.
5.) The Edina Country Club Historical Preservation Board should know that the changes that
need to be made to create a south facing driveway could affect the integrity of the historical
homes around it. If the builder decides to take down his chimney as one Camelot worker recently
explained to me, it will change the look of the house and potentially the integrity of the
neighborhood as most homes in Country Club maintain chimneys.
For a driveway to look aesthetically correct at 4622 Drexel, the front hill will need to be
dramatically landscaped. The hill currently is 30" to 40" inches higher than my existing driveway.
In order for the builder to make a south facing driveway, he would have to landscape his hill by
that much to create a driveway level to mine. There do not appear to be too many options in the
front of the property. A few that come to the mind of one local landscape designer are:
A.) The builder needs to construct a high retaining wall on the northern edge of the new driveway.
It will need to span roughly 30' from the house down to the street. This is a safety concern
because it exposes many children in the neighborhood -- especially mine, to a potential 3' to 4'
drop straight down onto a cement driveway for a span of 30'.
B.) The entire front yard would need to be landscaped in such a way that the properties'
foundation would be either completely exposed down 3' below grade or another large east (street
) facing retaining wall will be need to be created in the front yard. The elevation of this wall would
be another safety concern for kids.
My letter may seem like I wish to stand in the way of someone's development. It's not that at all. I
simply do not want to be part of a driveway project that jeopardizes my children's safety and
diminishes my property value. The City of Edina's application for a variance states that the
variance should "not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in
the vicinity or zoning district". I believe this variance request diminishes my property value
because most people don't want to share a driveway with their neighbor. I also believe the
variance request puts my children at risk as a new driveway will provide virtually no clearance for
the driver to maneuver around my fence or parked cars.
According to the website that Camelot Construction subscribes to www. contractors.com, they
build single family homes but specialize in "mobile home repairs and moving." This group
clearly has no experience building Country Club homes in Edina, MN. I do not think that the City
of Edina can necessarily dictate who gets a building permit but it seems like experience should
matter somewhat on this request.
I hope to attend the hearing on April 6, 2006 at 5:30 p.m.. I can certainly answer any questions
that you have in advance of the meeting. Please indicate that you have received my letter and
understand my request. Thank you for your attention.
Sincerely,
Daniel J. Delianedis
cc: C. Larsen, W. Houle
Hard copy will follow in mail.
Christopher & Annie O'Brien
4627 Drexel Avenue
Edina, MN 55424
March 28, 2006
Ms. Jackie Hoogenakker
Edina City Hall
Dear Ms. Hoogenakker,
I have received, the notice of public hearing for the zoning board's case
file B -06 -18 regarding the property at 4622 Drexel Avenue.
We do not support granting a width variance in this case for the following
reasons:
Most all of the homes in our section of the street have single
driveways on the some side of each house. I understand this
variance would be used to build a driveway adjacent to their
neighbor's driveway at 4624 Drexel. Having a double driveway
like that would be aesthetically displeasing.
It is not in keeping with the character of the rest of the houses.
1 do not particularly want to look out at wider stretches of
concrete.
It seems unnecessary with the current structure of the home
• It seems unfair to their immediate neighbors at 4624 who may not
want to have a double driveway and who could not have
foreseen something like this happening when they made their
decision to purchase.
The ordinance was put in place for a reason. Most likely to
protect the feel and character of the neighborhood.
Thank you for allowing us this opportunity.
Is it also possible to receive any information on the rest of the plans for
that property if there are large revisions planned? I am increasingly
concerned about recent projects and protecting the historic character
of the neighborhood
Thanks again,
Chris & Annie O'Brien
Annie.obrien @earthlink.net
T •d
Donald and Sharon P leischmann
4621 Drexel Avenue
Edina, Minnesota 55424
952- 920 -7918
We own the property across the street from the property 4622 Drexel Avenue requesting
the driveway "width" variance. We received notice from the City of Edina as we arse
within 200 lixst. Much to our surprise, not only is there a width variance, but the driveway
will actually be relocated. We strongly oppose the approval of this variance in its
entirety. We are currently out of town a,-a the Fdinn schools are on spring break or we
would attend the meeting April 6th and rurther explain our objections.
17 irra Country Club is struggling with th tear downs.
whole issue of redevelopment and te downs.
The Mayor and City Council are currently studying this issue. We are asking the Board of
Appeals not to consider the requcsted driveway variance in isolation without looking at
the bigger picture. It is not "merely u mutter of inches" as 1 was told by Kris Acker.
Clearly we are not alone in our b0icl' that "smart development" must be balanced with
the needs ofthe neighlx)rhood in which it takes place. As residents our concerns are
maany. The lira than the city planning department staff' thinks this driveway issue "is no
big deal- is outrageous. It is a "hig deal" to us as we live there and will have to live with
the outcome of this decision.
The i3oaard of Appenl; should not look merely at the width of the driveway in isolation.
as the rvi.it.ioner is actually asking for the driveway to be moved from the north side of
the Property to the south side to build a detached garage; in the rear of the property. This
goal can he achieved without u variance:. 1 realize after talking with Joyce Repya that the
F1PB wunts tat see the tuck under garage: removed And this can be achieved by simply
building the detached garage on the north Hide without putting undue hardship on any of
the neighbors.
17x: new curb extension needed would allow parking at the rear of our driveway severely
limiting our ability to exit our driveway. It is impossible to bet a full sure vehicle out
when cars are parked directly behind our driveway. This creates a hardship for us and to
our guests.
Our objections are many..
1.) 'I'he prop;rty presents no "undue hard:dtip ". The only hardship is economic for
Camelot Construction. 77ac property can be developed with no variance and still achieve
the I iPI Is desire to sax; the tuck under garage removed.
2.) No current south elevations are on file with the planning department when 1 reviewed
the plan.: can file as required by the variance request. The chimney will be removed but it
is unclear what the south elevation will look like.
* *ST Ttr9 T99
'Jr JaAaa •o sewer dgTaeo 90 go Jdd
3.) Who on the 1.113,13 approved that the driveway could be moved? At what meeting was
this discummud't'I'he 1 IPB never intended the current community standards to benefit s
developer at the expense orthe current neighbors. Who will pick up the cost Of the new
curb and sewer redesign?
4.) "ltcatiunuhle Use- is tip ror interpretation. variances should only be 1panted if there is
no other altenttttive. '
5.) '111c "parallel- driveway proposed puts an undue hardship on all current property
uwnem . especially the property to the south. This is a problem created by the petitioner.
Not all properties in Country Club lend themselves to radevclopment at the lowest cost
without exutnining alternatives that achieve the same result and satisfy the neighborhoods
concent ror appropriateness.
Minnesota Statutes and Edina Ordinances require that the variance will "Relieve and
ttncitie hardship which is not self imp ved of a mere inconvenknee." We specifically
river that this hardship is selr impo%ed and therefore must be denied.
'Thank you ror the opportunity to comment.
Sharon and Donald Ficischtnann
Copy: Roard ol'Appxils
Jackie I Im%criakker
2 • Cl *461 1 *9 199 • Jr JOAOa • 0 saver dS 1 t eo 90 So idd
April 2, 2006
To The City of Edina Zoning Board:
We are writing in response to the request for a variance for the property at 4622 Drexel Avenue.
Our home is 4623 Drexel Avenue which is directly across the street from this property. We have
had construction on all immediately adjacent sides of us for the almost four years we have lived
here, most of which have had variances, and we have not opposed any of them. We are very
much against the building of a driveway adjacent to 4624 Drexel for several reasons.
The most important reason is safety. The grade of the hill the driveway would be on is very
steep. In surveying all the driveways in the Country Club neighborhood we found only one
adjacent driveway with this steep of grade and that had at least 6 inches of "neutral cement"
separating the two driveways. Safety is an issue with any adjacent driveway situation, however
when it is on as steep a hill as this the situation is much worse. It's very difficult to see children
when backing out down a hill.
It is also our understanding that the proposal is to make the driveway a half a foot narrower than
code. It is very difficult to get a full size car into most of these driveways without driving onto
the grass much of the time and it would be impossible to do so in one smaller than code,
especially if there are cars parked in the other driveway. This of course assumes the driveways
are on the same level. If they were on different levels with the one at 4622 being narrower it
would be very treacherous to use that driveway at all. If they are. on the same level then an
adjacent driveway quickly becomes a shared driveway out of necessity for the future owners of
4622.
The other major concern we have is the storm sewer drain which would need to be moved to the
street from the curb. We have the storm drain in the street at the end of our driveway and the
street floods all of the time due to that getting blocked with debris. The flooding would be much
worse if both the storm drains were in the street. At least now the one in the curb can't get
blocked.
Finally, on a personal note, we would never buy a home with an adjacent driveway. We have
friends who moved from a home in Country Club with an adjacent driveway cited as one of the
reasons. We would be very disappointed with the workings of this city if they forced a veteran
property owner to decrease the value of their home and compromise the safety of their children
and others in the neighborhood for the convenience of a construction company.
Thank you for your consideration of this letter.
Sincerely,
Shannon Neale and William Richards
4623 Drexel Avenue, Edina
Jackie Hoogenakker
From: Heather Dexheimer [hdexheimer @visi.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 3:00 PM
Jackie Hoogenakker
Cc: CiscoandClint @aol.com; 'Karl Dexheimer'
Subject: FW: 4622 Drexel Avenue Variance Appeal
Ms. J. Hoogennakker,
I am writing this email regarding the variance appeal for the 4622 Drexel Avenue, Edina property and am sorry to say that
my husband and I will not be able to attend the meeting tonight, Tuesday, June 20, 2006. Since we are not able to attend,
I would like to state our opinion on the variance that the 4622 Drexel Avenue property owner is trying to get approved.
We understand that he is proposing a shared or common driveway with the neighbor (4624 Drexel Avenue) to the south of
his property (4622 Drexel Avenue). We live at 4619 Drexel Avenue and have recently completed a major remodel and
understand the process of updating these homes in the Country Club neighborhood and keeping with the architecture of
the era that these homes were originally built. With this being said, we do not support what the property owner is trying
to get approved for the following reasons:
Safety of the residents of the surrounding homes would seem to be compromised with what he is trying to get
approved. The "new" driveway would limit driver visibility when backing out of the "new" garage which would then
compromise any residents whether they are adult or children that would possibly be out working, playing, socializing,
etc.
2. A shared or common driveway is not at all desirable. Speaking from experience when growing up in neighboring
10 suburb, Minnetonka, we shared a driveway with our neighbor. Needless to say it created many issues throughout the
years that would have never been issues if the driveways were not shared. Currently, we fully enjoy our neighbors
and love the fact that we can go outside to socialize, play, etc. without any issues regarding driveways and would like
to keep it that way.
Thank you so much for your support and interest in this manner. We regret that we will not be able to attend the meeting
tonight, but please know that we do NOT support the variance that is being proposed.
Thank you,
Heather Dexheimer
4619 Drexel Avenue
Edina, MN 55424
952- 922 -2583
6/20/2006
CHRISTOPHER & ANNIE OIBRIEN
4627 DREXEL AVENUE
EDINAV MN 55424
June 15, 2006
Ms. Jackie Hoogenakker
Edina City Hall
Dear Ms. Hoogenakker,
We have received the notice of public hearing for the zoning board's
case file B -06 -23 regarding the property at 4622 Drexel Avenue.
We do not support granting a width variance in this case for the following
reasons:
• Most all of the homes in our section of the street have single
driveways on the same side of each house. Wel understand this
variance would be used to build a driveway adjacent to their
neighbor's driveway at 4624 Drexel. Having a double driveway
like that would be aesthetically displeasing.
• It is not in keeping with the character of the rest of the houses.
• We do not particularly want to look out at wider stretches of
concrete.
• It seems unnecessary with the current structure of the home.
• It seems unfair to their immediate neighbors at 4624 who may not
want to have a double driveway and who could not have
foreseen something like this happening when they made their
decision to purchase.
• The ordinance was put in place for a reason. Most likely to
protect the feel and character of the neighborhood.
Thank you for allowing us this opportunity.
Is it also possible to receive any information on the rest of the plans for
that property if there are large revisions planned? We are increasingly
concerned about recent projects and protecting the historic character
of the neighborhood.
Thanks again,
Chris & Annie O'Brien
Annie.obrien @earthlink.net
1;1
T-RIFF-777"
An
Am
LOCATION MAP
T1
Lli
cc
W
in
CO
V"� „
'S
S�Y,'jj�
sSZ
YES`
r° Y
"'t
�s
zit � �
/%CGS
M
:°
T1
C1
44 iw
%-
t,�
VA
i
y
1M
S"
A
4
R 2
2, r.
Ol
C1
44 iw
%-
t,�
VA
i
y
1M
S"
C1
%-
t,�
VA
i
y
S"
A
R 2
v
m
C1
i
S"
A
C1
C2
r( 7cjiail��
s;
C2
r( 7cjiail��
%,
.4 vm
0 V
,c+
SA/b
�*Pf
f�
C2
c
IN' -1 - I I
9�11
FRONT ELEVATION
50ALE: 1/4" = P-O"
2 RI&HT SIDE ELEVATION
Al 5CALE; , /4" = 1'-0"
m -q
,fir
12�11 15 S
Wo.Xev
qq
Lliy
ra esAaa
cm
E
1 ION
SCALE. !/4" = 1 `— `
'P, go M �
,w
g
r,
ra
lira -
a
� a
.�a
f/ v
z.
3
i
1Fz
s
x•
'P, go M �
,w
g
r,
ra
lira -
i�
x
� a
f/ v
z.
3
i
1Fz
'P, go M �
,w
g
r,
ra
lira -
i�
x
� a
f/ v
z.
r
ref
,w
ra
lira -
i�
x
� a
z.
NOWAM
5CALEg VV 1'-0'
Immmosm
# #
w
1M
�/
t�
�/
Ff3 gd i✓
112
z
+J
15T'& MAIN FLOOR PLAN
mommmcm
III
WN
v th,
ia,
..........
. . . . . . . ....
WN
v th,
ia,
mmm
-'g" 4-6
S
g/!
om,
,
and
r
t
.L
IWO
<4
IN"
I EX15T'& UPPER FLOOR
ALE= ' a P-O"
gotaffimmim
Sri �5
wn
ro?
MWA
✓7i.
r�a/h
� «/ �;
r g
str
5,"y„
A5PHALT
5HiAdl�L7
i —♦
FRONT ELEVATION
5 REAR L TI
Al SCALE: ,&„ = I' -0"
Y
a
I ELEVATION
Al ALE: !/4" W 1' -0"
1
g
M ��^^ sd 24'0L ROOF
"' 055 AALL 5HEATHIN&
2xb STU 16" OL.
5EE PLAN
POR FTC, SIZE D I
SAL, �
EXT. AATERPROOFINC7
TO FIN15H &RAOE
or 31
3
y.
3
3
si°
Ls w g
N us of
f s
or 31
C
y.
si°
Ls w g
N us of
f s
f
VIM
��*✓
<F
�L
MA,
�
Y N
i
J.
�B
mr
uk
'o..Ski3
vx✓`
t,
eyv
qu4/
G.1y
�rr5�
or 31
RM
a 4" !
8
`p
s
Awl
Alk
L s
'oil
P'X
8
`p
s
r
L s
'oil
P'X
V19
R
s/
rsa
dl
nl
KT-� EAST ELEVATION
.. .. ... . ...... ............ .......................... ... ...........
........ .......... ........ . -- .......
.............. ............................ .. .........
........ ........... * ......... .. .............
2 SOUTH ELEVATION
WORNMAR
N Mol I
C
/ek du ft
aZ
w
r -
r r • •
r1►
4
few" /fm
,. J
tN w St
"o,
N u5 +5
'yam/
i
Y
r
�� e%. � •S
r`
few" /fm
,. J
tN w St
"o,
N u5 +5
'yam/
Y
r
�� e%. � •S
r`
�sry�
sN
{
ej
iry/�
dpi,
p
MAIN FLOOR, PLAN
4" o V-0"
r �, u < a. r r. • �
s ,r
NMIr
maimma ^ �
i
s
i
�R
s
i
W,
0 4
t
a
Y.r
x
y
'�rrgqrf
5
v. <t
•
/.� {{i
^ci$ r4 45
CPO
s
MAN
4
Ef� 0 IV
frf�
Y5
x
i
s
i
�R
i
W,
0 4
t
a
Y.r
x
y
'�rrgqrf
5
v. <t
•
/.� {{i
^ci$ r4 45
CPO
i
s
i
r
W,
0 4
Y.r
x
y
'�rrgqrf
5
tu!
/.� {{i
^ci$ r4 45
CPO
MAN
4
Ef� 0 IV
frf�
Y5
u
t
%
2%
>Are'
�s
Qt
�d
i
s
i
r
Y.r
x
1 '
s. }. 0
FIELD VE IF'' L FIELD VERIFY
1
EXIST'G UPPER FLOOR
5 SCALE: 8" = V--"
WRIMM
g f '.
ww';�a
x
��
f+ F�
g f '.
ww';�a
��
f+ F�
s
vtJ
'�..`s
l:
g f '.
r�
O
N
TO:
FROM:
VIA:
AGENDA ITEM: W.A.1
DATE: JUNE 20, 2006
.REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
MAYOR AND COUNCIL
CEIL SMITH, ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER
GORDON L. HUGHES, CITY MANAGER
�uts��c 1 HEVUL+NI rUx FURUHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
ITEM DESCRIPTION: WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE
COMPANY BID AMOUNT
1. LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 1. $433,315
INSURANCE TRUST
ENDED BID:
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INSURANCE TRUST - $433,315
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Staff recommends the quote from the LMCIT. The quote represents an 18% increase in premium.
The major reason for the increase is an increase in the City's experience modification which went from .89
to 1.06: Staff, with the help of Bill Homeyer, have reviewed the losses for the past year and have asked the
the LMCIT to review the reserves that have been set aside for the losses. The LMCIT has agreed to do
this and if some reserves can be reduced, they will adjust the quote. They have also agreed that if they find
some of the reserves need to be increased; they will not increase this. quote. Mr. Homeyer will be at the
meeting to present the quote.
Signature
The Recommended Bid is
(within budget)
ADMINISTRATION
Department
NA
(not within budget)
VwJ
L. ugh , C' Manager Ohn Wallin, Finance Director
City of Edina
Worker's Compensation
League of Minnesota Cities
2005
$355,230*
*Experience Modification of .89
2006
$433,315 **
*Experience Modification of 1.06 plus payroll
increase of 3%
Both years $10,000 Medical Deductible per claim
l�v +r 17
AGENDA ITEM: W.A.2.
� e DATE: JUNE 20, 2006
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
FROM: CEIL SMITH, ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER
VIA: GORDON L. HUGHES, CITY MANAGER
SU13JEUl': KEQUES'l' VUK YUKUHASE 1N EXUESS UY $15,000
ITEM DESCRIPTION: GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE
COMPANY BID AMOUNT
1. ST. PAUL TRAVELERS 1. $437,854
2. LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSURANCE 2. NO QUOTE
TRUST
3. CHUBB 3. NO QUOTE
RECOMMENDED BID:
ST. PAUL TRAVELERS - $437,854
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This quote is for General Liability, Equipment, Liquor Liability, Pollution, Employee Benefit, Law
Enforcement Liability, Employee Practices Liability, Public Entity Management Liability, Auto and
Terrorism. On the attachment, the quote is broken down by coverage. The quote this year represents a
7.3% reduction in premium. Mr. Bill Homeyer will be at the meeting to present the quote.
ADMINISTRATION
Signature Department
The Rec mm ded d is � (within budget) (not within budget)
Go on L. Hughes, i anager J n Wallin, Finance Director
City of Edina Premium Comparison
2006 2005
Equipment
$11,391
$13,121
Values of $2,465,569 in 2006
Values of $2,340,097 in 2005
General Liability
$145,436
$167,546
Limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence
Liquor Liability
$34,441
$34,985
Above Ground Pollution Liability
$6,290
$6,583 .
Employee Benefit Liability
$343
$381
Law Enforcement Liability
$70,196
$81,166
Employment Practices Liability
$25,577
$22,182
Public Entity Management Liability
$6,601
$8,994
Auto Liability
$122,353
$124,719
168 units & 27 trailers
179 units & 23 trailers
$1;000,000 Limit
Auto Physical Damage
$14,549
$15,177
TOTAL
$437,177*
$474,854*
*Includes terrorism coverage charges of $3,762 in 2006 and $6,094 in 2005
A
1N
o e
v � �y
.f
AGENDA ITEM: IV.A.3.
DATE: JUNE 20, 2006
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
FROM: CEIL SMITH, ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER
VIA: GORDON L: HUGHES, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE 11N EXCESS Ur' 515,000
ITEM DESCRIPTION: PROPERTY, BOILER & MACHINERY, INLAND MARINE AND
CRIME INSURANCE
COMPANY BID AMOUNT
1. ST. PAUL /TRAVELERS 1. $79,402
2. HARTFORD $100,000 /excluding dome
3. AFFILIATED FM NO QUOTE
I RECOMMENDED BID:
ST. PAUL /TRAVELERS - $79,402
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Attached is the Marketing Results and Pricing Information provided by Jack Carroll, AON
Insurance Company. The increase in premium is due to the 3% increase in the property values. Please
note that the actual rate -did not change from 2005. A representative from AON will be available to answer
questions.
Signature
The Recommended Bid is
II:�C6 /LZ!IJl % %v /ift��L
i i i i
N(within budget)
ADMINISTRATION
Department
F-1 (not within budget)
-t:
ohn Wallin, Finance Director
e PROPERTY, BOILER & MACHINERY, INLAND
' MARINE, AND CRU E
I. Marketing Results
The state of today's property marketplace is in turmoil. Virtually, everyone is
getting rate increases because of the significant property losses last year.
Aon is pleased to deliver a flat renewal, with no increase in rate, but an adjustment
of 3% of the total insured values to keep up with replacement cost standards.
A. Property/Boiler & Machinery:
Market Results
St. Paul/Travelers Quoted — Premium $79,402 (Includes Terrorism)
Hartford Indicated premium in excess of $100,000 excluding the
Golf Dome
Affiliated FM Declined due to percentage of Frame Construction
included in the total insurable values
h:\2006proposall.doc-- 6/16/06 Risk SerI Am
vices
III. Pricing
PROPERTY, BOILER & MACHINERY, INLAND
MARINE, AND CRIlVIE
• Payment Plan — 25% down, 9 equal payments — no interest
h:\2006proposalI -doc- 6/16/06
Risk Services I A
2004
2005
2006
Carrier
St. Paul
St. Paul
St. Paul
Travelers
Travelers
Travelers
Annual Premium:
$103,057
$76,736
$79,423
Rating Basis:
$83,446,936
$83,478,940
$86,081,352
Rate:
$.1235/$100
$.092/$100
$.092/$100
Estimated Annual Property Premium:
$103,057
$67,966
$75,118
Boiler & Machinery Premium:
$7,160
$4,486
Included
Marine Premium
$3,800
$3,800
$3,800
Crime Premium
484
484
484
Total Estimated Package Premium
$114,501
$76,736
$79,402
• Payment Plan — 25% down, 9 equal payments — no interest
h:\2006proposalI -doc- 6/16/06
Risk Services I A
TO: Mayor & City Council
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Public Works
VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
DATE: June 20, 2006 AGENDA ITEM IV. B.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: WTP #4 Chemical Room Expansion Roofing System.
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1 Omni Roofs Incorporated 1. $16,507.00
2. Royal Roofing 2. $21,053.00
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Omni Roofs Incorporated
$16,507.00
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This project is for the roof on the new Chemical Room at Water Treatment Plant No. 4. The
expansion of Water Treatment Plant No. 4 was bid twice in 2005, both lettings were over
budget. We have completed the structure with our Public works staff and are now furnishing
the inside components. This project is .part of the 2006 -2010 Capital Improvement Program
under the Backwash Recycling Tank: Treatment Plant No. 4, which was part of the original bid.
The Water Utility Fund will fund this improvement. Staff recommends awarding this quote to
Omni Roofs Incorporated.
ff-��gnature
The Recommended Bid is
within budget
not within budget
Public Works — Utilities
Department
Finance Director
TO: Mayor & City Council
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Public Works
VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
DATE: June 20, 2006 AGENDA ITEM IV. C.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Ventilation System for expansion of Water Treatment Plant No. 4
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. Forte Mechanical, Inc. 1. $14,975.00
2. Erickson PHC 2. $18,380.00
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Forte Mechanical, Inc.
$14,975.00
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This project is for a ventilation system to ventilate the new Chemical Room at Water Treatment
Plant No. 4; a requirement of the Minnesota Department of Health. The expansion of Water
Treatment Plant No. 4 was bid twice. in 2005, both lettings were over budget. We have
completed the structure with our Public works staff and are now furnishing the inside
components. This project is part of the 2006 -2010 Capital Improvement Program under the
Backwash Recycling Tank: Treatment Plant No. 4, which was part of the original bid. The
Water Utility Fund will fund this improvement. Staff recommends awarding this quote to Forte
Mechanical, Inc.
The Recommended Bid is
within budget
not within budget
Public Works — Utilities
Hughes, City
inance Director
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, City Engineer
VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
DATE: June 20, 2006
AGENDA ITEM IV. D.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Contract No. ENG 06 -7: 2006 Alley Projects and Stauder Circle Roadway
Improvement, Improvement Nos. A -210, STS -325, A -211, A -223, STS -324 &
STS -263
Company
1. DMJ Corporation
2. Hardrives, Inc.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
DMJ Corporation
Amount of Quote or Bid
$ 154,988.50
$ 258,328.60
$ 154,988.50
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This project is for alley improvements located at Madison /Jefferson Avenue, William /Hankerson
Avenue, Abbott/Beard Avenue and for roadway correction at Stauder Circle. The projects
include reconstructing the existing alleys and upgrading the storm sewer in the area. The three
alley projects were ordered by the Edina City Council at the May 2, 2006, Public Hearing. Special
assessments and Storm Sewer Fund will fund these projects. All three special assessed projects are
within the proposed assessment amounts. Staff recommends awarding the project to DMJ Corporation.
ignature
The Recommended Bid is
within budget
not within budget
Hughes,
Public Works - Engineering
Department
n Wallin. finance Director
REPORURE C OMMENDATION
To:
Mayor Hovland and members of
Agenda Item
IV. E.
the Edina City Council.
From:
John Keprios, Directo
Consent
VN
Park & Recreation Dep ent
Information Only
❑
Date:
June 20, 2006
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To ERA
®
To Council
Subject:
Two Steel Design Change Orders
®
Motion
Camelot Metals, Inc. -
❑
Resolution
Gymnasium Construction
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
RECOMMENDATION:
JPOC recommends approval of a $29,204.00 change order for Camelot Metals, Inc. to cover the
additional shop - drawing detailing, manufacturing, and installation costs associated with unforeseen
conditions coupled with design and coordination issues for the added roof structure steel and changes
in design for the Edina Community Center gymnasium project.
JPOC also recommends approval of a $7,680.00 for Camelot Metals, Inc. to cover the cost of
materials, additional shop - drawing, and installation of additional structural steel needed as part of the
South View Middle School gymnasium project.
INFOBACKGROUND:
On June 6, 2006, the Joint Powers Oversight Committee unanimously passed a motion to recommend
approval of a $29,204.00 change order needed to cover the costs associated with the redesign of the
roof structure steel for the Edina Community Center gymnasium project. The section of roof that
required redesign was the lobby and concessions area that connects the new gymnasium to the existing
Community Center building. Unforeseen conditions with the existing building played a large role in
the need to redesign the structural steel needed in that connection.
The total cost associated with this redesign is $39,110.00. The project architect, Rozeboom Miller, is
paying for $9,906.00 of those costs, which leaves a balance of $29,204.00.
2
On June 6, 2006, the Joint Powers Oversight Committee also unanimously passed a motion to
recommend approval of a $7,680.00 change order needed to cover the costs associated with the
redesign of the structure steel redesign needed for the South View Middle School gymnasium project.
Both change orders are also recommended by the project Construction Manager, Kraus Anderson.
There are seven previous change orders with Camelot Metals, Inc. that total $35,162.00, which is just
over 9% of the original contract amount of $389,000.00. These two additional change orders coupled
with the seven previous change orders collectively exceed 10% of the original contract amount and
therefore require City Council approval.
1trL AGENDA ITEM: N.F.
e DATE: JUNE 20, 2006
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
FROM: PATTY LATHAM, IT MANAGER
VIA: GORDON L. HUGHES, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
ITEM DESCRIPTION: ENTERPRISE SOFTWARE AGREEMENT
COMPANY BID AMOUNT
1. Software House International 1. $42,000
RECOMMENDED BID:
Software House International - $42,000
State Contract# 425551
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This is year three (3) of our six -year agreement with Microsoft renewing our original (206)
Enterprise Software Agreement licenses. The renewal of this contract allows the City the ability
to upgrade operating systems, and Office suite systems for these existing desktops, and laptops as
many times as necessary over the life of this six year contract. The City benefits by achieving
standardization, free software upgrades for the life of the contract, and citywide system
compatibility.
The Central Services General account will pay for this expenditure. Staff recommends we
proceed with this agreement.
ADMINISTRATION
Signature Department
v
The Reconmended id is (within budget) F-1 (not within budget)
G on L. Hughes, Manager Jo Wallin, Finance Director
}
REPORURECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor Hovland and members of Agenda Item V.A.
the Edina City Council.
From: John Keprios, Directf) Consent El
Park & Recreation Dcp aihnent Information Only ❑
Date: June 20, 2006 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
® To Council
Subject: Edina Youth Sports Taskforce - ® Motion
Public Hearing ❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
RECOMMENDATION:
The Park Board recommends approval of the Edina Youth Sports Taskforce
recommendations, which include their proposed "Youth Sports Core Values and
Community Strategy" document and the "Youth Athletic Association's Relationship
With the Edina Park Board and the Park and Recreation Staff' relationship document.
INFO/BACKGROUND:
At their May 9, 2006, meeting, the Park Board voted unanimously to accept the
recommendations of the Edina Youth Sports Taskforce. The recommendations consist of
the two attached documents, the "Youth Sports Core Values and Community Strategy"
document and the "Youth Athletic Association's Relationship With the Edina Park Board
and the Park and Recreation Staff' relationship document.
Youth Sports Core Values and
Community Strategy
1. The City of Edina believes in the benefits and attraction of youth sports as a means
to teach the children of this community values and skills that will be of benefit to
them throughout life; and
2. We believe that Edina's youth athletic associations develop fundamental internal
and external assets for children by providing opportunities to develop positive
character traits and life values where children can learn a multitude of important
lessons and valuable fundamentals, such as ethics, abiding by the rules, winning and
losing with grace, coping with success and failure, always trying to do your best,
respecting authority figures, learning about team work, developing fundamental
motor skills and sports specific knowledge; and
3. We believe that the most important underlying mission for every youth athletic
association is to develop emotionally, socially, and physically healthy children; and
4. We believe that youth sports programs conducted under the right conditions are
enormously beneficial for children; and
5. We recognize the need to ensure that Edina's youth athletic association programs
provide athletic programs that are safe, positive, fun, physically and psychologically
age- appropriate, educational, teaches values and ethics, strengthens the community,
promotes competition without conflict, open to all residents of all abilities and should
not be denied an opportunity to participate based on ability, offer a reasonable
number of events, and are administered by qualified volunteers; and
6. We believe that youth sports association league organizers and administrators
must be educated on how to provide a safe, positive, and fun youth sports
environment before being granted access to public facilities; and
7. We believe volunteer coaches and parents must receive orientation and education
as to the individual roles and responsibilities in our community's effort to raise the
standards of youth sports programs and that volunteer coaches and parents be held
accountable for their behaviors; and
8. We believe it is necessary and desirable to establish guidelines, requirements and
standards for youth sports associations utilizing public facilities; and
9. We recognize the need to ensure that Edina's youth athletic associations form and
advertise a formal grievance process by which residents are assured of an appropriate
venue and process to hear their grievances in a manner that is open, fair, and just; and
The City of Edina in a meeting duly assembled and by the authority thereof,
recognize and encourage official implementation of this Community Strategy to
improve the culture of youth sports for all participants.
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS day of 2006.
Signed:
Mayor of Edina
YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION'S RELATIONSHIP WITH THE
EDINA PARK BOARD AND THE PARK AND RECREATION STAFF
(RELATIONSHIP DOCUMENT)
The mission of the Edina Park and Recreation Department is to do our part in further developing, preserving,
and maintaining the City of Edina's parks, recreation programs, and resources as a premier and comprehensive
park and recreation department in the Twin Cities area.
This relationship document between the Edina Park and Recreation Department, Park Board, and with each
association, establishes a common set of guidelines that are to be adopted by all athletic associations. The intent
of these guidelines is to ensure that associations are mindful of the public's desire for positive and healthy
athletic experiences for children and families in our community.
The "Youth Sports Core Values and Community Strategy," established by the Edina Park Board m cooperation
with the Edina Park and Recreation Department, is to be adopted by all associations. This document formally
defines the City's core values and philosophy in the delivery of the community's youth sports programs.
1. Edina Park and Recreation Department will provide facilities and fields for boys and girls at each
age group within the association.
2. It is the City of Edina's view that the public is best served when there is only one independently
incorporated youth athletic association per sport. The City of Edina also understands and supports that
in some cases the public and volunteers are best served by having the traveling component of a
particular sport administered by its own independent youth athletic association.
3. The Edina Park and Recreation Department in cooperation with the Park Board will help each
association plan, and provide safe and well maintained public athletic facilities to meet the youth sports
programs, and give professional staff liaison services regarding the operation of their association, and
offer appropriate clerical and administrative support services.
4. The Edina Park and Recreation Department shall act as a liaison between the associations and the
Edina Park Board to assist associations in providing a well rounded and equitable program for all
participants.
The Edina Park Board expects that all associations follow these minimal guidelines in the operation
of their association:
1. All boys and girls have a fun, positive, safe, age - appropriate, educational experience that is open to all
residents of all abilities, and receive equal opportunity to participate at whatever ability level they may
play.
2. Boys and girls build good sportsmanship and character, learn to be a team member, learn to accept
discipline; incorporate psychological and physical health
3. Boys and girls, at each level of play, will receive basic fundamental and skill training in the sport in
which they participate.
4. Associations manage team schedules and provide equitable playing time for each level of competition
within the age group.
5. Associations shall have a common code of conduct for players, coaches and parents.
6. Qualified citizen volunteers should serve in positions as Board of Directors. Board of Directors must
have knowledge of the program / sport. Associations are encouraged to have open member elections to
elect Board of Directors.
7. Edina Park and Recreation Department personnel shall attend at least semi - annually association board
meetings. Department personnel shall be available and provide resource help to associations in training
of coaches, operations, and other functions with which the association needs assistance.
• Page 2
8. The Park and Recreation Department mandates background checks on all individuals 18 & older who
serve as a coach, referee, and each person serving on the Board of Directors in any association. It is our
intent to protect our children, families and the associations.
9. To ensure that the public has an open, fair and just process to handle grievances that are not resolved at
the association board or staff level, the City of Edina will facilitate a grievance process. (See Appendix
1.1) This grievance process is not intended to deal with team assignment, coach assignment or tryout
process grievances.
10. The Edina Park and Recreation Department shall establish minimum insurance requirements of each
and every association that uses Edina's public athletic facilities. This insurance shall provide for the
protection of volunteers, associations, and the City of Edina. (referred to insurance consultant)
11. The Edina Park Board and Park and Recreation Department shall provide and review annually
guidelines to be followed by all associations and users of facilities and gymnasiums in our community
as to the priority use of the Edina School District's gymnasiums and facilities, and the Edina
community practice and game facilities. This is to assure a fair allocation of gymnasiums and facilities
use for all participants, at all levels.
It is imperative that all associations, coaches, board members, volunteers and parents understand and appreciate
the positive experience that is desired for all participants in Edina youth sports. Therefore, the Edina Park and
Recreation Department and Park Board mandate that all new parents, volunteers, coaches, board members, etc.,
who participate in associations must read, understand and sign a copy of the relationship agreement and Youth
Sports Core Values and Community Strategy. Signed copies of these documents will be kept on file with the
association.
• Page 3
Appendix 1.1
The City of Edina demands that each youth athletic association must have in place a well- documented
and publicized grievance process by which residents are assured of an appropriate venue and process to
hear their grievances in a manner that is open, fair, and just. If the youth athletic association board
grievance process does not resolve the issue, then the matter will be referred to Park and Recreation
Department staff. If staff is unable to resolve the issue,. the matter should then be referred to the Ad-
Hoc Grievance Committee.
The Ad -Hoc Grievance Committee will be made up of three association presidents who are not
president of the association in question, plus two Park Board members. Those five individuals will hear
the complaint and make recommendations to solve the grievance matter. If the Ad -Hoc Grievance
Committee's recommendations do not satisfy the parties involved then the grievance will be referred to
the Park Board for a final decision.
The Ad -Hoc Grievance Committee will be formed only on an as needed basis to deal with issues on a
case by case basis.
The following escalation shall be followed:
Step #1:
Follow the written grievance procedure as established and publicized for each youth athletic
association.
Step #2:
If, in the complainant's view, the issue was not resolved in Step #1, then the complainant should contact
Park and Recreation Department staff, who will do the following:
A. Evaluate the complaint.
• Page 4
B. Determine and judge whether or not the issue can or should be resolved through diplomacy. If so,
staff will facilitate a problem - solving process at the staff level with the appropriate community
members and volunteers involved.
Step #3:
If the issue is unresolved at the staff level, then staff will assemble the Ad -Hoc Grievance Committee
to hear the complaint. With staff assistance and input from the parties involved, the Ad -Hoc
Grievance Committee will hear the complaint and make recommendations.
It will be the Ad -Hoc Grievance Committee's duty to determine whether or not the association has
acted in a manner that is contrary to the City's philosophy and core values; and if so, make
recommendations to correct the situation. It will not be the Ad -Hoc Grievance Committee's duty to
micro- manage program decisions of Edina's youth athletic associations.
Step #4:
If the parties involved are still not satisfied with the Ad -Hoc Grievance Committee's
recommendations, the final step is to refer the matter to the Park Board for a final decision.
Both parties must abide by the Park Board's decision or they could face sanctions.
• Page 5
iy
PLEASE NOTE:
THE ATTACHED
CORRESPONDENCE
HAS BEEN DUPLEXED
Darlene Wallin
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 10:07 AM
To: Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com
Cc: Darlene Wallin
Subject: FW:
Attachments: How Town Leaders Can Help Youth Sports.doc
Jennifer Bennerotte
Communications & Marketing Director
City of Edina
952 - 833 -9520
FAX 952 - 826 -0390
jennerotte@ci.edina.mn.us
From: Richard Collins [mailto:richardcollins @comcast.net]
Sent: Sunday, June f1, 2006 3:33 PM- -
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject:
6/12/2006
Page 1 of 1
How Town Leaders Can Help Youth Sports
It has been a long and wonderful spring. I've taken some time off from writing to
coach my high school girls track and field team. However, young kids continue to be on
my mind. How can we as a community help all of them have the best possible
experience in youth sports? One way this might be achieved is if our town leaders find
the courage to stand together and create a set of core values under which youth boards
agree to operate. It could be the next best step toward remaking our youth sports culture
into a culture where kid needs come first.
The Connecticut Youth Sports Initiative has drafted a set of core values that might be
considered. The first core value is that we need to treat kids as kids. I spoke with a high
school student recently. She said the world was a competitive place and the sooner kids
understood this, the better. She said it was critically important to separate the "good"
athletes from the "bad" ones as soon as possible so the good ones could receive the better
instruction and get better opportunities against other "good" athletes at the earliest
possible time. She said the "bad" athletes and their parents should just "get over it" and
by doing so, they would be happier when they accepted the fact that they needed to get
out of the way so the good athletes wouldn't be held back. Well. Where do I begin to
respond to this attitude? My first thought was this sounded to me like premature
professionalism. Didn't our country adopt child labor laws back in the early 20`h
century? No wonder so many kids don't enjoy youth sports, and so many parents feel
compelled to get their kids in the "system" as soon as possible. Kids are not miniature
adults. Somehow, we've come to accept this as a norm, in both the classroom and the
athletic fields. It's wrong. The kids who make elite teams and the kids who don't are all
suffering from issues that they are not prepared for. Some might disagree, but.I know
that kids do not have the psychological maturity to deal with being told they're good, or
bad, when they are eight or nine years old. I see how it affects them. It impacts my
ability to teach them. Now, when kids get to junior high, that should be the time when
they can begin to be culled from the pack. Puberty has begun to kick in (the only true
indicator of athletic potential). The kids are at a better place in terms of accepting being
placed on teams of better kids. And the reality of differing developmental timelines can
be taken into account instead of placing early bloomers in a caste system while late
bloomers get washed out.
A second core value our group advocates is that the needs of kids are not the needs of
adults. Adults, and in particular, adults who run youth sports tend to be successful,
competitive professionals. Naturally, they bring their competitive nature to the world of
youth sports. It is their need to see how their program stacks up against other programs,
or other teams. For adults, that's fine. They have the psychological maturity to handle
competing, winning, and losing. High school kids, and junior high school kids to a lesser
extent, have developed the psychological tools necessary for a competitive situation. I
took a survey of high school kids and asked them what their reasons for participating in
youth sports were. About 90% of the surveys showed that they started playing youth
sports because they wanted to have fun, play, and be with their friends. About 90% of
the surveys listed as their last four reasons for playing youth sports were to make elite
teams, travel, win, and to be separated because they were better. I then gave the same
survey to fourth and fifth graders. The results were almost identical. Adults need to take
M
a long, hard look at these results. Youth sports programs need to be overhauled to meet
the actual needs of kids and not their perceived needs, filtered through the eyes of adults.
A third core value our group advocates for is the elimination of specialization of sports
for young kids.. Specialization leads to burn out. It's a fact. Too much of anything isn't
good. Believe it or not, but kids who play a particular sport less tend to love it more. I
have watched a particular high school team play not to lose rather than playing to win.
They are lethargic, they don't seem to be having any fun, and their play is dispirited.
Have them play less and they won't be able to wait until their sport season starts. Right
now, the system is set up so that parents feel their kids will fall behind if they do not
participate in one particular sport for multiple seasons. Some sports in town now have
three seasons, or one season that lasts almost nine months, and that isn't counting the
pressure placed on families to have their kids participate in off - season camps. As a
professionally trained educator and coach, I witness first hand the increase in injuries
associated with over use, specific to doing the same sport over extended periods of time.
I know a college athlete who devoted all of his time in youth and high school to become
the best player on his team for his sport. He received financial aid to play his sport in
college, (not a scholarship... there's a big difference) and he has been plagued by injuries
throughout. He had his first major knee surgery as a sophomore in high school and has
had three subsequent knee surgeries since. His days of playing college sports are over,
and he is only a junior. How many stories do parents and youth boards need to hear to
suggest emphatically that specialization is detrimental to proper body development?
Drive a car hard and hit the breaks on it hard enough and the breaks will wear out. I
heard a story from a friend recently about an eleven -year old kid who pitches for his
major league team who could hardly lift his shoulder from all the pitching he was doing.
The kid was in tears before his coach finally pulled him out. Overuse injuries in youth
and high school sports are rampant, and parents who put their kids in these situations are
risking the health of their kid. And a coach who sees a kid struggling with soreness and
does nothing about it so her or his team can win is negligent and should be run out of the
league and never be allowed to coach anyone, ever again. Period. Finally, specialization
for the dream of winning that scholarship is a myth. A myth. Facts don't lie. Let your
kid try many sports. How else will she or he find out what he might really love and be
good at? And youth boards, storm your state sport organization. Demand that they
eliminate the pressure town boards are under to compete with other towns. State
championships, state cups, or any high stakes tournament for kids under 12 should be
eliminated. It is these state boards and governing bodies that push youth boards to
compete. And they make plenty of money along the way. These state organizations
serve no one but themselves, and they put their sport above the needs of kids. Finally,
to the youth boards that worry that kids will leave their program in droves and join even
more elite, "premiere" teams if their board makes some of these changes, so be it. If that
is the price your program pays for doing what is right for the kids who trust you, then you
will sleep very well at night in deed. If you can't stand the idea that some parents will
bolt with their kids to join premiere teams, then you must consider that winning is more
important to you than the kids you claim to serve.
The Connecticut Youth Sports Initiative calls on all Recreation leaders, high school
athletic directors, boards of selectmen, and boards of education to come together within
the next six months and form your own set of core values under which each youth board
agrees to operate. We call for action now for the benefit of all of our kids.
5 Page 1 of 2
Darlene Wallin
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 10:18 AM
To: Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com
Cc: Darlene Wallin
Subject: FW: Meeting on youth sports with City Council June 20th
Jennifer Bennerotte
Communications & Marketing Director
City of Edina
952 - 833 -9520
FAX 952 - 826 -0390
jennerotte@ci.edina.mn.us
From: keap'em all playing [mailto:mikburger44 @yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 11:59 PM
To: keapem @yahoo.com
Subject: Meeting on youth sports with City Council June 20th
Hello
The Edina City Council has courageously asked for a public hearing
June 20th - Tuesday in Council Chambers on the issue of Youth Sports in Edina.
The meeting will start at 7:00 pm. 50th and HW 100
If how youth sports are done in Edina is important to your family please attend.
Sincerely
Paul Bearmon
More information at www.keap.net
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http: / /mail.yahoo.com
6/12/2006
Page 1, of 1
Darlene Wallin
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 9:20 AM
To: Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com
Cc: Darlene Wallin
Subject: FW: Edina sports
From: Robbie Harnois [mai Ito: rharnois@gsrgroupinc.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 3:27 PM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: Edina sports
After being involved with sports in Edina with three boys for 11 years and seeing the sports fervor at an all time
high, I would comment:
-If dads are going to coach, there should be some guideline and pre- sign -on understanding of what their role is.
An example would be to define over - involvement, the stacking of teams, son /daughter favoritism, living through
their child...These are all extremely common but unspoken tendencies that have downplayed and
downgraded youth sports in general. It has only worsened in the last decade, accelerating the already out of
control emphasis placed on the simplicity to playing a sport. The question should be addressed head on: Why do
parents role model the hyper- concerned attitude to sports to our children? How can we stop it from spinning out
further than it already has (i.e. the cultural norm)? It is becoming a generational problem and needs serious
attention.
Bottom line: sports are supposed to be a recreational activity. Defined, the child should come away feeling
refreshed and more ready to do OTHER things in his /her life with more zeal having been renewed by a positive
physical activity that is enjoyable to them. 'Recreation' is in the dictionary—Latin and other definitions. The word is
also defined in the Bible (and I am sure other religious texts).
Let's get back to the basics and put some boundaries around the parent politics to tame the cultural fervor around
sports today. There is a way to do that —it's only a choice away. Contrarily, I have seen many parents
involved who observe the over zealous parent and /or parent coach component. They are the ones on the
sidelines calmly enjoying the game talking about whether the TEAM is having fun.
6/9/2006
Page 1 of 1
Darlene Wallin
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 9:24 AM
To: Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com
Cc: Darlene Wallin
Subject: FW: youth sports task force
From: Johnson, Doug [ mailto :DouJohnson @edina.kl2.mn.us]
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 3:15 PM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: youth sports task force
6 -7 -06
Members of the Council:
The report of the Youth Sports Task Force is very well done.
While some may disagree with the conclusions of the report, I support them. The Task Force carefully
analyzed the pros and cons and the related data. Their process was thorough and thoughtful. I
commend them for their efforts.
As a father of four children that participated in all levels of sports and also as person who coached many
sports, I think we have excellent youth sports programs. Edina is truly blessed to have great volunteer
leadership as well as tremendous support from a caring and competent Park & Recreation staff.
I believe that youth sports are a wonderful way of promoting developmental assets. Edina gets an "A"
for its quality, diversity, and affordability of youth programs.
In my opinion, the Council has an excellent report before it. I suggest that you recognize the Task Force
and their report and accept their conclusions. Then it is time for the Council to move on to other critical
issues facing you. Enough time and effort have gone into this topic.
Thank you for your continued good work on our behalf.
Doug Johnson
5119 Valley View Road
Edina, MN. 55436 -2644
6/9/2006
Page 1 of 1
Darlene Wallin
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 8:52 AM
To: Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com
Cc: Darlene Wallin
Subject: FW: youth sports
Jennifer Bennerotte
Communications & Marketing Director
City of Edina
952 - 833 -9520
FAX 952 - 826 -0390
jbennerotte @ci.edina.mn.us
From: Vilipski, Cathy [ mailto :CatVilipski @edina.kl2.mn.us]
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 3:19 PM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: youth sports
I feel that there are too many late practices and games for the elementary grade levels. Especially, my third
graders who fall asleep in the class and don't have homework done. It would help if the coaches would support
that family and school should come first.
Cathy Vilipski
Cornelia Ele.
Confidentiality Notice
If the information in this electronic communication relates to an individual pupil, it is a confidential
pupil record under Minnesota Law and may not be reviewed, distributed, or copied by any person other
than the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. This electronic communication is intended solely for the
use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any further review,
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this electronic communication or any attachment thereto is
strictly prohibited. If you have received an electronic communication in error, you should immediately
return it to the sender and delete it from your system.
6/8/2006
Page 1 of 1
Darlene Wallin
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 8:31 AM
To: Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com
Cc: Darlene Wallin; John Keprios
Subject: FW: For Youth Sports Task Force Members - George Klus, Tom Asp, Mary Brindle, Steve Dove,
Russ Fortner, Molly Friedemann, Keith Harmon, Lynne Morishita, Karla Sitek and Michael Weiss
Jennifer Bennerotte
Communications & Marketing Director
City of Edina
952 - 833 -9520
FAX 952 - 826 -0390
jennerotte@ci.edina.mn.us
From: Kathy Iverson [mailto:menze002 @umn.edu)
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 6:19 AM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: For Youth Sports Task Force Members - George Klus, Tom Asp, Mary Brindle, Steve Dove, Russ Fortner,
Molly Friedemann, Keith Harmon, Lynne Morishita, Karla Sitek and Michael Weiss
Dear Youth Task Force Members, I am addressing you via email, as I will be out of town on June 20th, the
scheduled public hearing. There is an opportunity through the task force to address healthy youth development- in
terms of increasing physical activity, building connections to caring adults in the community, creating a place for
youth to belong, giving kids something to do, learning the value of teamwork and supporting youth to reach their
potential. As I learned at the first Youth Sports Task Force public meeting, there were lots of parents of younger
children there, who did not speak at the meeting in public, but approached me afterwards to discuss their
concerns regarding their 3 and 4 year olds in Edina athletic programs. This clarified for me the day -to -day reality
that children experience (either themselves or as observers) in current athletic programs. Let's promote a NEW
WAY of addressing kids' athletics programs. I cannot tell you how to do this, but your expertise and passion for
this area, can generate some creative approaches to make youth programs Fun, Sustainable (for the kids), & with
Physical Activity for All. Just one idea - - -the physical education teachers at Burroughs Elementary school in
Minneapolis, have designed a new program for youth and physical activity. Their website describes the
program —it may not look real professional, but there's some really great info there, and it promotes their fun idea.
Check out their website at: www.homepage .mac.com /activesolutions or you can call them: Pete Hill or Lowell
Peterson at 952 - 212 -7290.
Kathy Iverson
Chemical Health Coordinator
City of Edina
5701 Normandale Road
Edina, MN 55424
952 - 929 -7627
6/16/2006
Page 1 of 1
Darlene Wallin
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 2:53 PM
To: Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com
Cc: Darlene Wallin
Subject: FW: Please forward to city council
Jennifer Bennerotte
Communications & Marketing Director
City of Edina
952 - 833 -9520
FAX 952 - 826 -0390
jennerotte @ci.edina.mn.us
From: Rosemary Manion [mailto:rmanion @mn.rr.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 2:48 PM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: Please forward to city council
received an email from "KEAP" and was asked to send my thoughts to the city council regarding the need for a
"Youth Council" to oversee the volunteer sports associations. Our children have played both "House and
Travel' programs. While not perfect, overall I feel the associations do a good job and there is not a need for a
"Youth Council".
Thank you.
Rosemary Manion
6/20/2006
Page 1 of 1
Darlene Wallin
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 2:44 PM
To: Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com
Cc: Darlene Wallin
Subject: FW: Youth Sports -- Current System a Disservice to All Edina Youth
Jennifer Bennerotte
Communications & Marketing Director
City of Edina
952 - 833 -9520
FAX 952 - 826 -0390
jbennerotte @ci.edina.mn.us
From: John Hobday [mailto:jhobday @mn.rr.com]
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 2:43 PM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: Youth Sports -- Current System a Disservice to All Edina Youth
Dear Edina Councilmembers,
With regards to the recommendations on youth sports, I would applaud any effort that would prohibit recruitment
of non -Edina youth on our city or club teams. The current system is a disservice to all Edina Youth.
John
John V. Hobday
3700 West 57th Street
Minneapolis, MN 55410
952 - 928 -7722 (office)
952 - 928 -7058 (fax)
612 - 709 -7777 (cell)
ihobday�mn.rr.com
This message is intended for the addressee(s) listed above, and may contain information that is confidential and
privileged. If you are not the addressee, any use, disclosure, copying or communication of the contents of this
transmission may be subject to legal restrictions or sanctions. If this message is received in error, please notify us
immediately by telephone and return the original message to us at the above -noted e-mail address. Please
remove any and all copies from your system(s). Thank you.
6/19/2006
Page 1 of 1
Darlene Wallin
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 9:06 AM
To; Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com
Cc: Darlene Wallin
Subject: FW: Youth Sports
Jennifer Bennerotte
Communications & Marketing Director
City of Edina
952 - 833 -9520
FAX 952 - 826 -0390
jennerotte @ci.edina.mn.us
From: KALROACH @aol.com [mailto:KALROACH @ aol.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2006 9:41 AM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: Youth Sports
Hi! I'm unable to attend the city council meeting on the 20th that will address youth sports in Edina and ask that
you forward this email to the city council before this meeting. Although I have not voiced my opinion on this
matter previously, I thought I would now.
I do not understand Mr. Bearmon's issue in his last email. How you can have a Youth Council, or similar entity,
and not micro - manage the sports associations sounds like conflicting information to me. I have had three
children in sports. They have participated in Soccer, Basketball, Baseball and Hockey as well as on school
teams. They played on both "house teams" as well as "travelling teams" and I was a team manager for many
years. Our feeling was that if a child wants to give a large commitment of time to a sport, they would try out for
a travelling team. One child preferred to play more on house teams as there was less time commitment
involved. But you will occasionally see parent coaches on house teams requiring way to much time
commitment in their quest for victory. Maybe they are having a hard time securing additional playing time on
fields. I believe the house teams needs are secured before traveling teams can request additional space.
There have been times when one or another of my children thought they should have made a higher level team
and didn't and it was a learning experience in their lives. There were times when 1 thought the process could
have been better so I made appearances, and spoke, sometimes with other parents, at association meetings.
The input was taken and I actually did see changes being made for the better. Sometimes this takes a couple
years but it did happen. I did not see any retribution against us. There will sometimes be individuals on a
particular association board who really don't look out for everyone's interest, only their own, but that's why
parents should go to the board meetings and voice their opinions.
The allocation of resources can be an issue. Too bad we don't have a fourth ice rink at Braemar and baseball
has been losing ground in recent years with adequate fields for the older players but I will say though that Ed
McHolda and his staff have done a wonderful job when I've had to work with them to secure playing time.
My youngest is now in High School so maybe I'm out of the loop but I would worry that creating another
entity such as a Youth Council could do more harm than good. Many wonderful parent volunteers, coaches and
managers might decide to not get involved because there would be micro - managing and that would be a loss to
everyone.
Sincerely, Karen Roach
Page 1 of 1
Darlene Wallin
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 8:55 AM
To: Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com
Cc: Darlene Wallin
Subject: FW: Bredesen Park construction
Jennifer Bennerotte
Communications & Marketing Director
City of Edina
952 - 833 -9520
FAX 952 - 826 -0390
jennerotte@ci.edina.mn.us
From: FranzSr @aol.com [mailto:FranzSr @aol.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2006 9:59 PM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Cc: Mar29got @aol.com; ccncorkyneuman @MSN.com
Subject: Bredesen Park construction
Attention Council Members, City of Edina Administration;
I am aware that a group of residents has requested the Council to consider building a nature center at
Bredesen Park.
As an Edina resident since 1946, and a resident who has enjoyed first hand the benefits of living here, I am
appalled that anyone would propose such a structure. Bredesen Park is a marvelous environment for nature
already. It is wonderful to have a place in town that is not developed. The peace and quiet in the Park is truly
amazing considering the location in our suburban area. We have plenty of places for school groups, birthday
parties, and other group activities.
Our Council and City Administration has been elected and hired to maintain our quality of life in Edina. If you
are interested in investing 1.4 million dollars in our community, don't waste it on nature centers. Our roads
need work. We can always improve our wonderful schools.
Speaking for many neighbors, we strongly oppose this nature center proposal, and will deliver our message at
any Council meeting where the issur will be discussed.
Franz And Joanie Burris
5832 Olinger Blvd.
Edina, MN 55436
tel. 952 920 1529
6/19/2006
Darlene Wallin
From:
Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent:
Tuesday, June 20, 2006 8:10 AM
To:
Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com
Cc:
Darlene Wallin
Subject:
FW: Youth Task Force
Jennifer Bennerotte
Communications & Marketing Director
City of Edina
952 - 833 -9520
FAX 952 - 826 -0390
jbennerotte@ci.edina.mn.us
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Jodi Roberts [ mailto :jodi.roberts @hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 5:51 PM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: Youth Task Force
Dear City Council Members -
I have two boys, who are both involved in a number of sports within the city. While I
cannot say that the oversight on all sports is perfect, I do STRONGLY believe that an
additional city oversight committee is not the right approach to take. In our experience,
when inequities exist within a sport, the directly responsible boards DO take action to
correct them. We have first hand knowledge of this occuring within the football and
hockey associations. I am confident that other associations would act in kind.
My husband and I actively participated in athletics through the high school, college and
post - collegiate ranks. We can assure you, that the level of politics and over scheduling
that exists today is nothing new. The alternative today is that if you make local sports
too complicated, kids will simply leave to go to other "club" teams. This will only serve
to drain the existing sports network for all kids.
Our entire family believe that fitness opportunities should be available for everyone, and
they are. The house leagues exist to give everyone a chance to play. If there is not
enough participation to warrant a house league after a certain age, perhaps the outspoken
father needs to recruit others to play some pick up games. We do not believe it is up to
a city to provide fitness experiences for our children. We are STRONGLY opposed to more
city involvement, particularly in this matter.
Thanks for your
Jodi Roberts
4536 West 56th
Edina, MN 55424
consideration,
Street
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE!
http: / /messenger.msn. click - url.com /go /onm00200471ave /direct /O1/
June 12, 2006
Edina City Council
4801 West 50'x' Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Re: Edina Youth Sports Task Force
Dear City Council Members:
We serve as Co- Presidents of the Edina Hockey Association. In that capacity, we write to offer
our comments on the Edina Youth Sports Task Force recommendation, which we understand
will be presented to the Council on June 20, 2006.
As a threshold matter, we understand that in Edina, as elsewhere, concerned citizens can, and
frequently do, have substantially different views on important issues, including youth sports.
Indeed, this diversity of opinion is a strength of the community at large, and operates to the
benefit of the children who participate in Edina sports programs. In that spirit, we appreciate the
mission of the Edina Youth Sports Task Force, and thank its members for their valuable
contribution and substantial investment of time.
As you may know, the Edina Hockey Association is one of the largest youth hockey associations
in Minnesota. For the upcoming 2006 -07 season, we project having approximately 40 teams
comprising roughly 1,200 boys and girls, ranging in age from "termites," who are kindergartners,
through girls U 19. Our teams are coached and managed by volunteers and the Association is run
by a Board of 17 Edina residents.
While the EHA is certainly imperfect, it has been a tremendously successful program over time
for both the children of our community and their parents. Thus, when we first learned that a
Task Force was being formed, we had some concern that the EHA model which has served the
great majority of Edina residents so ably could be replaced with new oversight, regulation and
mandates from a small, but well organized, group of individuals.
We, therefore, attended several Task Force hearings and read with interest the Task Force
recommendations. We were invited to provide comments and the Task Force listened to our
input, adopting a limited number of our suggestions, and rejecting others. The bottom line is that
we believe the process was fairly handled, and our positions and concerns were reasonably
recognized whether accepted or not, and taken into consideration in the final recommendation.
While we believe certain revisions may be warranted in the fixture, the recommendation as
submitted by the Task Force, and forwarded by the Park Board, represents, in our judgment, a
good faith effort to serve the interests of Edina youth and to accommodate the different
perspectives on the issues presented. On that basis, we wish to memorialize our support of the
Task Force recommendation.
Thank you.
Very truly yours,
Steve Halgren and Dan Hoene
278065A•I
Darlene Wallin
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
;ent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 2:09 PM
To: Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com
Cc: Darlene Wallin
Subject: FW: AGAINST Youth Sports Taskforce recommendation
Jennifer Bennerotte
Communications & Marketing Director
City of Edina
952 - 833 -9520
FAX 952 - 826 -0390
jbennerotte@ci.edina.mn.us
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Linda Ostrem [ mailto:lindaostrem@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 2:02 PM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: AGAINST Youth Sports Taskforce recommendation
Dear Edina City Council,
I am an Edina resident with two children involved in community sports, primarily house and
traveling soccer. I do not want our local government to
have authority over our local independent sports associations. This would
be overstepping on the part of the city government. It would also cost me more money both
in team fees and as a taxpayer. The parents and volunteers should be able to run their
awn organization. Please do not adopt this recommendation.
Thank you,
Linda Ostrem
5837 Ewing Ave. S.
Edina
1
Page 1 of 1
Darlene Wallin
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 2:09 PM
To: Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com
Cc: Darlene Wallin
Subject: FW: Youth Sports Taskforce
Importance: High
Jennifer Bennerotte
Communications & Marketing Director
City of Edina
952 - 833 -9520
FAX 952 - 826 -0390
jennerotte @ci.edina.mn.us
From: Dean Williamson [mailto:dean.williamson @frauenshuh.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 1:47 PM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: Youth Sports Taskforce
Importance: High
I wish I had more time to explain but I just received information about the meeting tonight. I feel the
recommendations provided by the Youth Sports Taskforce is completely WRONG! No offense, but we do not
need another governmental layer involved.
Edina has an excellent sports program for kids of all ages and abilities. I do not want my tax dollars spent this
way so please do not get in the middle of this situation!!!
By the way, I was born (1967) and raised in Edina and currently reside at 5711 Londonderry Road. I have been
both a player and coach within the community, and strongly feel all the associations run fairly well. Thanks for
your consideration.
Dean Williamson
Senior Vice President
Frauenshuh Companies
6/20/2006
Darlene Wallin
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 2:26 PM
To: Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com
Cc: Darlene Wallin
Subject: FW: AGAINST Youth Sports Taskforce recommendation
Jennifer Bennerotte
Communications & Marketing Director
City of Edina
952 - 833 -9520
FAX 952 - 826 -0390
jbennerotte @ci.edina.mn.us
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Linda Ostrem [ mailto:lindaostrem @hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 2:02 PM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: AGAINST Youth Sports Taskforce recommendation
Dear Edina City Council,
I am an Edina resident with two children involved in community sports, primarily house and
traveling soccer. I do not want our local government to
have authority over our local independent sports associations. This would
be overstepping on the part of the city government. It would also cost me more money both
in team fees and as a taxpayer. The parents and volunteers should be able to run their
own organization. Please do not adopt this recommendation.
Thank you,
Linda Ostrem
5837 Ewing Ave. S.
Edina
1
oe
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Debra Mangen
City Clerk
Date: June 20, 2006
Subject: Resolution Receiving
Donations
Recommendation:
Adopt Resolution.
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
Info/Background:
In order to comply with State Statutes all donations to the City must be adopted by a
resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I
have prepared the att ached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the
recipient departments for your consideration.
Agenda Item # V. B.
Consent
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends
To HRA
®
To Council
Action
®
Motion
Resolution
Ordinance
Discussion
Info/Background:
In order to comply with State Statutes all donations to the City must be adopted by a
resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I
have prepared the att ached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the
recipient departments for your consideration.
RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -68
ACCEPTING DONATIONS
ON BEHALF OF THE
CITY OF EDINA
City of Edina
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal
property for the benefit of its citizens;
WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds
majority of its members.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation
the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens.
Donations to the Edina Art Center as follows:
Georgia Rouman
John Telfer
Melinda Erickson
Kurt and Laura Nisi
Doreen Halvorsen
Dated: June 20, 2006
Attest:
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)SS
CITY OF EDINA )
$200
$ 25 Misc. Pottery tools
$ 50
$ 60
$10
James B. Hovland, Mayor
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the
attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting
of June 20, 2006 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 20_.
City Hall
4801 WEST 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394
www.cityofedina.com
City Clerk
952 - 927 -8861
FAX 952 - 826 -0390
TTY 952 -826 -0379
To: City Council
From: James B. Hovland
Mayor
Date: June 20, 2006
Subject: Appointments to Community
Education Services Board and
Edina Community Health
Committee
REPORT /REC:OMMLN UA t tuN
Agenda Item V. C.
Consent
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends F-1 To HRA
W 11
To Council
Motion
Resolution
Ordinance
Discussion
Recommendation:
Endorse Mayor's appointment of Ann Swenson, Linda Presthus, and Cheryl Gunness to the
Community Education Services Board for a one year term ending June 30, 2007; and Janet
Johnson to the Edina Community Health Committee for the remaining term of Lynn Moline
until February 1, 2008.
Info/Background:
The Community Education Services Board has three positions from the City of Edina. The
Board requires the City to appoint the following representatives: one from the City Council, one
from the Park Board and a representative at large. The term for these appointees expires June
30th of each year. It is my intention to reappoint the three people currently serving for the City
who are: Ann Swenson, Council representative, Linda Presthus, Park Board representative,
and Cheryl Gunness, at large representative.
The Edina Community Health Committee has two openings. I intend to appoint Janet L.
Johnson and Mary Jo Kingston for two terms ending February 1, 2008. These vacancies were
the result of resignations of two members of this committee earlier in the year.
4
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Boyd Tate
Traffic Safety Coordinator
Date: June 20, 2006
Subject: Traffic Safety Staff Review for
June 8, 2006
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
V.D.
Consent
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
® To Council
Action
® Motion
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Review and approve Traffic Safety Staff Review of Thursday June 8, 2006.
Info /Background:
It is not anticipated that residents will be in attendance at the Council meeting regarding any of
the attached issues.
G:1 Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Advisory Committee \Staff Review Summaries \06 TS AG & Min\06- 08- 06.doc
TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW
Thursday June 8, 2006
The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on June 8, 2006. Staff present included the
City Engineer, Traffic Engineer, Traffic Safety Coordinator, Sign Coordinator, and Chief of
Police.
From that review, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons
involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them.
They have also been informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional
facts to present, they can be included on the June 20, 2006 Council Agenda.
SECTION A:
Requests on which staff recommends approval:
On March 21, 2006 the City Council asked the Traffic Safety Committee to look
at no parking for Sunday's only on Wilryan Avenue from Normandale Church to
West 61St Street. Parking is currently allowed on both sides of Wilryan which
causes the street to become too narrow for emergency vehicles to safely pass.
This issue was previously addressed in June of 1999. Residents were surveyed
about restricting parking to one side only during church services. The issue was
resolved when the Church agreed to expand its parking lot. No further action
was taken at that time.
Wilryan Avenue is a 29 -foot wide City street with curb, gutter and no sidewalks,
located just to the west of Normandale Church. Parking is currently allowed on
both sides of the street. Wilryan. No vehicle or pedestrian accidents have
been reported in the past five years.
On April 28, 2006, a survey was sent out to twelve homes on Wilryan Avenue
that would be affected by any new parking restrictions. Of the twelve surveys
sent, eleven were returned. The residents were overwhelmingly in favor of
restricting parking on Wilryan Avenue to one side only parking on Sundays
during the a.m. hours. Staff feels that by restricting parking along Wilryan
adjacent to the church will provide and maintain adequate street width making it
accessible to emergency vehicles.
Staff recommends posting "No Parking Sunday A.M." signs on the West
side of Wilryan Avenue from the north lot line of 6104 to the south and west
around the curve to 6112 Wilryan Avenue.
Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 1 of 4
June 8, 2006
2. Request from Edina Fire Marshal to restrict parking on the north side of School
Road to the west of Concord School and south around the curve to West 60th
Street. The Fire Marshal states that it is extremely difficult for emergency
vehicles to navigate and operate along this street during school events due to the
narrow width with vehicles parked on both sides of the roadway.
School Road is a 24 -foot wide City Street with curb, gutter and no sidewalks.
There have been no vehicle or pedestrian accidents reported in the past five
years.
School Road has the following parking restrictions currently in place: "No
Parking Anytime" on the north side of School Road from Concord running west
to the parking lot of Concord School. "No Parking School Days" on the south
side of School Road from Concord Ave running west to 4729 School Road.
Parking is allowed on both sides of the street west of the parking lot and south to
West 60th Street.
The Fire Marshal is requesting that we continue the No Parking Anytime
restrictions on School Road, on the north /west side only, from the Concord
School parking lot west and south around the curve to West 60th Street to make
the street more accessible to emergency vehicles.
Staff recommends that "No Parkinq Anytime" signs be alaced on the
3. Request from Edina Park and Recreation Department to further restrict parking
on Doncaster Way, adjacent to Highlands Park, during late afternoon and
evening hours when park events take place. Parks staff are concerned about the
street becoming too narrow for emergency vehicles to pass when vehicles are
parked on both sides of the street.
Doncaster Way is a 30 -foot wide City street with curb, gutter and no sidewalks.
It's located on the east side of Highlands Park and fills up with vehicles during
park events. There have been no reported vehicle or pedestrian accidents
during the past five years.
Doncaster Way currently has restricted parking on the east side of the street
starting to the north of Croyden Lane and running north to the dead -end parking
lot. This portion of Doncaster Way is posted "No Parking Monday- Friday 5:00
p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Parking on both sides of Doncaster is permitted from Ayrshire
Blvd. to the north (400 -feet) to where the restrictions begin.
After study and review, staff feels that Doncaster Way should be restricted on the
east side of the street north from Ayrshire Blvd. 400 -feet, to connect with the
current restrictions. Staff feels that restricting this portion of Doncaster will help
ensure the safety of its residents by ensuring adequate emergency vehicle
access.
Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 2 of 4
June 8, 2006
Staff recommends restricting parking on the east side of Doncaster Way
from Ayrshire Blvd. north 400 -feet to where the current restrictions begin to
"No Parking 5:00 to 9:00 a.m. Monday through Friday.
4. Request to post a 10 mph speed limit sign at the entrance of the dead -end alley
that begins at the rear of 4409 Country Club Road. Requestor states that many
vehicles attempting to access Wooddale Park drive into this alley.
Requestor is a resident of Country Club Road who is concerned with the safety
of pedestrians and vehicles using this alley. Requestor states that many vehicles
are unaware that the alley dead -ends because the dead end sign is partially
obscured by a tree limb. Requestor states that many people drive into this alley
in an attempt to access the park, only to have to turn around and drive back out
The alley is 16 -feet wide and runs east and west . It widens to 54 -feet at the
dead -end and is directly to the north of Wooddale Park. A pedestrian path
begins at the point where the alley dead -ends. The dead -end sign at the
entrance is partially obscured and staff has already taken action to correct the
problem. A sign with Park & Recreation regulations is also posted at the alley
entrance. The only entrance /exit to this alley is directly behind 4409 Country
Club Road. No pedestrian or vehicle accidents have been reported in the past
five years.
Staff feels that by posting a 10 m.p.h. speed limit sign at the entrance of this
alley will be a reminder to motorists and help insure the safety of the residents.
The legal alley speed limit in accordance with Minnesota Statute is 10 mph.
Staff recommends the installation of a 10 M.P.H. speed limit sign at the
alley entrance behind 4409 Country Club Road.
SECTION B:
Requests on which staff recommends denial of request:
1. Request for a painted center line to better help define driving lanes on Creek
Valley Road and Nordic Circle West.
Requestor is a resident on Creek Valley Road who is concerned for both
pedestrian and vehicle safety during the summer months when afternoon and
early evening activities at Creek Valley Park draw vehicles into the
neighborhood. Requestor states that vehicles traveling east on Creek Valley
Road turning north on Nordic Circle West to access the park are cutting the
corner and not staying in their proper driving lane. Requestor feels that this
"corner clipping" could result in an accident.
Creek Valley Road and Nordic Circle West are both 28 -foot wide city streets with
curb and gutter. The intersection is uncontrolled and there are no sidewalks on
either street. There have been no reported pedestrian or vehicle accidents in the
past five years.
Staff feels that painting lane markings on Creek Valley Road would not alleviate
the incautious driving habits of motorists. This intersection is very typical of
Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 3 of 4
June 8, 2006
many intersections throughout Edina. Staff does recommend that an e-mail
message to the soccer families that use this facility be sent reminding program
participants to use due caution when driving through neighborhoods to access
the park. Stall will coordinate this with the Parks Department staff.
Staff recommends denial of request for a painted center line on Creek
Valley Road and Nordic Circle West for lack of warrants.
SECTION C:
Requests that are deferred to a later date or referred to others:
None for June 8, 2006 meeting.
Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 4 of 4
June 8, 2006
Wilryan Avenue Parking Restrictions Survey
(Adjacent to Nonnandale Lutheran Church)
Address
Restric$ions,during Sunday services
Restrictions only during Nov -Api
Restrictions during services � 6.9am-12pm)
Restrictions o I one side of street
Restrictions to both aides of the,atreet
Yes
No
Yes
omment: It is a blind comer and it ns to
nk u arou curve - due to Un
6121 Wilryan
drive through when churchgoers are arriving or
blind comer. Even with only one side of the
departing. I also fear someone will be hit by a
See comment to the left.
Comment: Sometimes the church has events
street dear, it is hard to manuver when two
car.
outside of this timeframe.
cars need to pass.
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
6113 Wilryan
mment: Signs sho temporary.
Removed when not in operation.
5100 W. 62nd St.
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
6128 Wilryan
Comment Only at the curve in the road.
General Comment: The parking doesn't really bother us, except when there's lots of snow-it could be dangerous. '1 definitely do not want a'no
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
Comment: The only reason needed in summer
Comme nt:And only on one side of the street
Comment: As stated in #3 only needed
6120 Wilryan
is around that curve - because of the incline
from the driveway of 6104 around the curve to
from the driveway of 6104 Wilryan to the
above the curb people tend to park out further
the lot line of 6104 and 6112 (diagram drawn on
lot line between 6104 and 6112. Just
Winter or summer.
survey).
around that curve)
mmend: Please no.
enera mment: Plea se on y t curve portion o street. o not want no pa ng s gns re e se on our a@ it Is not needed. YFEW
you.
No
Comment Their new parking lot is supposed to
alleviate this. Otherwise, l do not want parking
6112 Wilryan
restrictions that would affect my ability to park
Comn>ant: If there have to be restrictions, then
on the street or m friends abliities .
the should be limited.
Gerreral Comment: What Is supposed to be the arid result? I do not attend the and the nrrttber of care during services is an annoyance. However, restricting street parking will orgy lead to more people having to walk in the
streets to the church - pedestrians could pmusent an even greater danger. How many residents are complaining? This seems small - minded and a waste of taxpayers dollars.
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
6116 Wilryan
CCmme : Especially around the comer
rCA me Parking on one side of the street
by the parking lot When cars are parked
Is sufficient. 1 have never felt restricted In
on both sides of the street, it is dangerous
traveling during church services. it is only
to drive past them.
about an hour each week.
6109 Wilryan
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
6117 Wilryan rY
treat is very o—o—ngested so
emergency vehicles could never get through.
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
6124 Wilryan
CComrr nt: Winter months only will be
me One side of the curve on Wilryan
inwfliderd. Year round restrictions are
Comm r!t The church has multiple other events,
(suggest Inner part of curare) year-round 24
needed.
so this time window would not be enough.
Comment: See comment to the right.
hr. parking restrictions are needed.
General Comment: A recap of what is discussed at the planning meeting would be much app related. Thank you for looking Into our concerns.
No
I
Yes
Yes
No
Cc rd: If you must, but ifs no different
Commend: If you must, but that means
lanyone
than a Mpls city street all hours of the day
more garish signs and they will go in
6104 Wilryan
and night. Ifs croweded, but I don't believe
Corning : If you must. It seems so Edina sort of
neighbors yards. Have they thought of
Comment: Attendance is lower In summer.
has not been able to got through.
like the garbage can rule.
that?
General Comment: Perhaps you should see if they problem is alleviated by the new parking area that will be constructed on the property the church just bought from the Carderelles. We're heading into the low season' anyway for
parking. The parking never goes very far down the street anyway. and there's always an easy way in lout the other way. The only house that Is always congested is ours and we don't mind. Wow, I must have some grumpy neighbors.
June 12, 2006
School Road Area Residents
Edina, MN
Re: Restricted Parking on School Road
City of Edina
Dear resident:
City of Edina
I am writing this letter to address the parking issues along School Road in response to a
recent request by the Fire Marshall to further restrict parking on School Road. As is well
known, much of the available parking along School Road is used by participants
attending events held at Concord School.
The Fire Marshall is concerned about the ability to get emergency vehicles down School
Road during events at Concord School due to the narrowing of the street when vehicles
are parked on both sides.
The Traffic Safety Committee met on Thursday June 8, 2006, to discuss and review this
safety issue. The north side of School Road is already posted "No Parking Anytime"
from Concord Avenue to the west to the school parking lot. There is no restriction to the
west and to the south to W. 60th Street.
After study and review, staff will be recommending to the City Council that the north
side of School Road be posted "No Parking Anytime" west from the school parking lot
and south to W. 60'' Street on the north and west sides respectively. Staff feels that this
added restriction is necessary to ensure the safety of the residents on School Road.
This recommendation will be presented to the City Council at its regularly scheduled
meeting on Tuesday June 20, 2006, at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall. Please contact me prior to
June 20th if you wish to attend the meeting and speak to the Council concerning this
issue. I can be reached at 952- 826 -0349 or e-mail at btate(@,ci.edina.mn.us.
Sincerely,
Boyd Tate
Traffic Safety Coordinator
City Hall 952- 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390
EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379
June 12, 2006 City of Edina
Doncaster Way Area Residents
Edina, MN
Re: Restricted Parking on Doncaster Way
City of Edina
Dear Resident:
I am writing this letter to address parking issues along Doncaster Way in response to a
recent request by the Edina Park & Recreation Board to further restrict parking on
Doncaster Way adjacent to Highlands Park. As is well known, much of the available
parking along Doncaster is used by participants attending events held at Highlands Park.
Park Board officials are concerned about the ability to get emergency vehicles down
Doncaster during events at the Park due the narrowing of the street when vehicles are
parked on both sides.
The Traffic Safety Committee met on Thursday June 8, 2006, to discuss this issue. A
portion of Doncaster is already posted "No Parking 5:00 to 9:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday." This restriction begins approximately 400 -feet north of the intersection of
Ayrshire Blvd., on the east side of the street, and continues north to the parking lot.
After study and review, staff will be recommending to the City Council that the 400 -
feet of Doncaster Way to the north of Ayrshire Blvd., be posted "No Parking 5:00 to 9:00
p.m. Monday through Friday" on the east side of the street. The entire length of
Doncaster Way, on the east side of the street, will then be restricted during the 5:00 -9:00
p.m. Monday through Friday period. Staff feels that this added restriction is necessary to
ensure the safety of the residents in regards to adequate emergency response access along
Doncaster Way.
This recommendation will be presented to the City Council at its regularly scheduled
meeting on Tuesday June 20, 2006, at 7:00 p.m. Please contact me prior to June 20, if
you wish to attend the meeting and speak to the City Council concerning this issue. I
can be reached at 952- 826 -0349 or e-mail at btate(a)ci.edina.mn.us.
S' ,
Boyd T t
Traffic Safety Coordinator
City Hall
4801 WEST 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394
www.cityofedina.com
952 - 927 -8861
FAX 952- 826 -0390
TTY 952- 826 -0379
6/7i 11:30:07
Page- 1
Business Unit
EDINBOROUGH PARK
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
Chemical Rm. Expansion -plant 4
DISTRIBUTION
WATER TREATMENT
14.24
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
137102
053006
2210.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
COMMUNICATIONS
i
CITY OI
+
R55CKREG - .10000
100631 ANDERSON, TODD
87.22
DV CAM TAPES
137103
Council Check Register
5410.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
87.22
6/8/2006
-- 6/8/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
285055
6/812006
118261 2ND WIND EXERCISE INC.
MICROWAVE
137541
060206
5421.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GRILL
158.69
TREADMILL REPAIR
00002148 137393
22- 011755
5620.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
158.69
102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE
285056
6/812006
100715 ACCLAIM BENEFITS
FOOD
137104
577560
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
405.90
FSA ACCOUNT ADMIN
137314
357407
1550.6040
HOSPITALIZATION
191.50
COBRA ADMIN
137315
357607
1550.6040
HOSPITALIZATION
597.40
285057
618/2006
102971 ACE ICE COMPANY
142,92
137239
465156
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
128,92
137240
465155
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
22,12
137241
465153
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
39.40
137242
606257
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
11.00
137243
606261
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
72,12
137244
606272
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
46.12
137245
606263
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
462.60
285058
6/8/2006
102626 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES
597.47
READY MIX
00005917 137101
4150017
05453.1705.31
MATERIALS /SUPPLIES
349.05
READY MIX
00005917 137316
4150018
5913.6520
CONCRETE
946.52
285059
6/8/2006
111228 ALDEN POOL & MUNICIPAL SUPPLY
7,396.55
CHEMICAL FEED EQUIP PARTS
00005700 137172
600203
5915.6530
REPAIR PARTS
7,396.55
285060
6/8/2006
118989 ANDERSON, CHERYL
6/7i 11:30:07
Page- 1
Business Unit
EDINBOROUGH PARK
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
Chemical Rm. Expansion -plant 4
DISTRIBUTION
WATER TREATMENT
14.24
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
137102
053006
2210.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
COMMUNICATIONS
14.24
285061 6/8/2006
100631 ANDERSON, TODD
87.22
DV CAM TAPES
137103
052606
5410.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
87.22
285062 618/2006
101548 ANDERSON, TOM
145.24
MICROWAVE
137541
060206
5421.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GRILL
145.24
_ 285063 6/812006
102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE
74.50
FOOD
137104
577560
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
6/8/2006 -6/8/2006
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
1646.6103
1646.6103
1318.6406
5440.5511
5440.5511
5440.5511
5440.5511
1553.6530
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
6/7/2006 11:30:07 .
Page - 2
Business Unit
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
74.50
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
285064 6/8 12006
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
114475 ARMOR SECURITY INC.
134.19
MONITORING SERVICE
00001603 137317
102617
88.66
MONITORING SERVICE
00001603 137318
102618
222.85
285065 6/8/2006
119831 ARNEVIK, LENNIE
43.26
IRRIGATION REPAIR
137319
053106
43.26
285066 6/8/2006
102134 ASHWORTH INC.
189.35
MERCHANDISE
00006188 137544
726850
1,712.47
MERCHANDISE
00006188 137545
719049
89.41
MERCHANDISE
00006485 137546
723240
1,639.39
MERCHANDISE
00006485 137547
714903
3,630.62
285067 6/8/2006
100634 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO.
46.23
CONNECTOR
00005815 137173
10003261
46.23
285068 _ 6/8 /2006
102573 ASSOCIATION OF RECYCLING MANAG
50.00
WORKSHOP REGISTRATION
137394
060106
50.00
' 285069 6/8/2006
101954 AUGIE'S INC.
72.43
FOOD
137105
4892
72.43
285070 6/812006
100638 BACHMAN'S
317.20
FLOWERS
137501
052006
1,390.55
PLANTINGS
137501
052006
1,707.75
285071 618 /2006
103241 BALDINGER, WENDY
125.00
PERFORMANCE 6/15/06
137496
060106
125.00
285072 618/2006
102195 BATTERIES PLUS
121.35
BATTERIES
00003584 137502
18- 145574
121.35
,r
1646.6103
1646.6103
1318.6406
5440.5511
5440.5511
5440.5511
5440.5511
1553.6530
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
6/7/2006 11:30:07 .
Page - 2
Business Unit
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
REPAIR PARTS
5952.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD
5422.6275
1644.6541
5610.6136
1470.6406
COURSE BEAUTIFICATION
PLANTINGS & TREES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
RECYCLING
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
TREES & MAINTENANCE
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
r r r
CITY OF
6/7/: 1:30:07
R55CKREG . ,10000
3
Council Check Register
Page-
6/8/2006
--6/8/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
285073
61812006
102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC.
61.83
BATTERY 00001509 137174
28268
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
61.83
285074
6/8/2006
119629 BEAVER'S POND PRESS INC.
612.50
PROOFREADING 00006286 137106
06 -2980
5400.2072
MEN'S CLUB
GOLF BALANCE SHEET
612.50
285075
6/812006
100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS
591.23
ICE LINE KIT 00008034 137320
00056073
5521.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ARENA ICE MAINT
591.23
285076
6/812006
101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION
115.08
137246
41551600
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
2,664.50
137247
37221800
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
98.10
137248
37251700
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
190.30
137430
41567500
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
3,067.98
285077
6/8/2006
105864 BEN MEADOWS COMPANY
277.20
WADERS, LIGHTSTICKS 00001482 137175
1008003390
1301.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
277.20
285078
6/8/2006
117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC.
563.56
LAWN CARE 137503
11352
7411.6136
SNOW & LAWN CARE
PSTF OCCUPANCY.
563.56
285079
6/812006
100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS
22.03
OFFICE SUPPLIES 137107
WO- 406538 -1
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
20.83
INDEX TABS 137108
WO- 406429 -1
1504.6218
EDUCATION PROGRAMS
HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION
43.37
BINDERS 137109
WO- 406234 -1
1190.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ASSESSING
86.23
285080
6/8/2006
119679 BIXBY PORTABLE TOILET SERVICE
413.75
RENTAL UNITS 137504
4380
1642.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
FIELD MAINTENANCE
413.75
_
285081
6/8/2006
101010 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY
519.68
WIRE TERMINALS 00001418 137110
95237339
1321.6530
REPAIR PARTS
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
519.68
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/7/2006 11:30:07
Council Check Register Page - 4
6/8/2006 --6/8/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanatlon PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
285082
6/8/2006
100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS -
70.35
CAPS, GASKETS 00001219
137111
871843
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
70.35
285083
6/8/2006
100664 BRAUN INTERTEC
1,028.15
CONCRETE TESTING 00001547
137176
261827
05427.1705.21
CONSULTING INSPECTION
PLANT #3 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYST
1,028.15
285084
6 /812006
104470 BRIDGESTONE GOLF INC.
136.92
GOLF BALLS 00006104
137112
1001344313
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
136.92
285085
6/812006
119826 BRYANT GRAPHICS INC.
1,165.11
LIQUOR POSTCARDS
137113
8346
2210.6575
PRINTING
COMMUNICATIONS
1,165.11
285086
618/2006
103228 BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS INC
1,559.58
EMPLOYEE RELATIONS REPORT
137321
10044945
1120.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
ADMINISTRATION
896.94
EMPLOYMENT GUIDE
137322
10044944
1120.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
ADMINISTRATION
2,456.52
285087
6/8/2006
103244 BURTIS, ROBERT
150.00
PERFORMANCE 6/20/06
137499
060106
5610.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
ED ADMINISTRATION
150.00
285088
6/812006
119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES
14.05
137249
100747
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
589.50
137250
100746
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
36.65
137431
100750
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
5,002.70
137432
100749
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
5,642.90
285089
6/8/2006
102064 CASH REGISTER SALES & SERVICE
170.00
PROGRAM UPDATE & SUPPLIES
137395
AQUTIC CENTER
5311.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
POOL OPERATION
170.00
285090
6/8/2006
116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE .
775.00
137251
44475
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
775.00
137252
44474
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
131.81-
137433
42696
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,418.19
R55CKREG _ ,4000 CITY OF
Council Check Register
6/8/2006 --6/8/2006
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
285091 61812006 100681 CATCO
36.61 CONNECTORS 00005817 137114 1 -10089 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS
30063 DRYER KIT 00001507 137177 3 -04297 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS
1551.6186
7413.6582
4088.6103
5842.5514
5822.6122
5842.6122
5862.6122
1120.6103
1140.6103
1180.6235
1554.6230
1646.6610
1552.6406
1552.6406
1553.6610
1552.6406
1375.6530
1375.6530
HEAT
FUEL OIL
6/71. A:30:07
Page - 5
Business Unit
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
CITY HALL GENERAL
PSTF FIRE TOWER
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREE REMOVAL
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING
ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING
ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING
POSTAGE ELECTION
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
337.24
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
GENERAL SUPPLIES
285092 6/8/2006
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
3,205.71
5591458 -4
137115
052306
70.61
5590919 -6
137505
MAY2306
3,276.32
285093 6/8/2006
105038 CENTRAL MN TREE SERVICE LLC
2,343.00
ELM TREE REMOVAL
00001597 137323
052206
2,343.00
285094 618/2006
119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO
848,75
137434
313256
848.75
285095 6/812006
103040 CITY PAGES
80.66
MAGAZINE ADVERTISING
137324
100154751
80.66
MAGAZINE ADVERTISING
137324
100154751
80.68
MAGAZINE ADVERTISING
137324
100154751
242.00
285096 618/2006
105693 CITYSPRINT
9.37
COURIER
137540
1492
18.63
COURIER
137540
1492
55.09
COURIER
137540
1492
183.94
COURIER
137540
1492
267.03
285097 618/2006
101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS
165.27
GLOVES
00001413 137178
02820626
153.90
SUNSCREEN, LOTION
00001481 137325
02824090
314.48
GLOVES, SAFETY GLASSES
00001472 137326
02823634
26.12
SAFETY GLASSES
00001500 137327
02826074
503.94
GLOVES, BOOTS, RAINSUITS
00001477 137328
02823743
1,163.71
285098 6/8/2006
116356 CONSTRUCTION MIDWEST INC.
_
342.08
SIKAFLEX, SOLVENT
00001468 137329
360541
248.19
HEADER MATERIAL
00001341 137506
360939
1551.6186
7413.6582
4088.6103
5842.5514
5822.6122
5842.6122
5862.6122
1120.6103
1140.6103
1180.6235
1554.6230
1646.6610
1552.6406
1552.6406
1553.6610
1552.6406
1375.6530
1375.6530
HEAT
FUEL OIL
6/71. A:30:07
Page - 5
Business Unit
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
CITY HALL GENERAL
PSTF FIRE TOWER
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREE REMOVAL
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING
ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING
ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING
POSTAGE ELECTION
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS PARKING RAMP
REPAIR PARTS PARKING RAMP
20.00 FUEL SURCHARGE 00005311 137556 82700824 -06 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT
20.00
CITY OF EDINA
6/7/2006 11:30:07
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 6
6/8/2006
- 6/8/2006
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No'
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
590.27
285099 618 /2006
103833 CROW - HASSAN NURSERY L.L.C. -
675.00
TRANSPLANT TREES
00001549 137552
2687
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
DISTRIBUTION
675.00
285100 6/8 12006
102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING
2,771.90
137253
363310
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
3,570.55
137254
364036
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
30.16
137255
363311
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
731.29
137256
364039
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
4,978.10
137435
364229
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
138.00
137436
363312
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
108.16
137437
364230
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
1,548.00
137438
363837
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
13,876.16
285101 6/812006
100716 DELEGARD TOOL CO.
16.06
SOCKETS-
00001346 137330
895031
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
7.72
SCREWDRIVER
00005171 137331
881607
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
5.19
SOCKETS
00001646 137332
879145
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
23.76
WRENCH
00001515 137555
896725
1553.6556
TOOLS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
52.73
285102 6/8/2006
100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY
78.24
BAKERY
137116
216230
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
58.95
BAKERY
137117
216231
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
9.26
BAKERY
137396
216555
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
32.85
BAKERY
137397
216609
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
179.30
285103 6/8/2006
102831 DEX MEDIA EAST
18.00
137118
304362732
5430.6188
TELEPHONE
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
108.80
137118
304362732
5420.6188
TELEPHONE
CLUB HOUSE
132.50
137118
304362732
5511.6188
TELEPHONE
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
469.30
137119
304362744
5610.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
ED ADMINISTRATION
728.60
285104 6/8/2006
100731 DPC INDUSTRIES
20.00 FUEL SURCHARGE 00005311 137556 82700824 -06 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT
20.00
R55CKREG L. .[0000
CITY OF
Council Check Register
6/8/2006 --6/8/2006
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account DescrlpUon
285105 6/812006 100735 E-Z SHARP INC
64433 SHARPENING SUPPLIES 00008032 137333 10108 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
617/1 1:30:07
Page - 7
Business Unit
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
644.33
285106 6/8/2006
100739 EAGLE WINE
1,686.85
137257
417194
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
299.98
137258
417204
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
6.14-
137259
694374
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,778,92
137443
417207
5642.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
3,759.61
285107 6/6/2006
100741 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
1,360.80
137260
320376
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
209.75
137261
320335
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
4,890.35
137262
320288
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
499.00
137398
18303
5421.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
GRILL
5,264.85
137439
320384
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
3,860.00
137440
320400
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
1,293.65
137441
320375
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
428.55
137442
320402
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
17,806.95
285108 6/812006
100746 ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR
301.61
FASCO MOTORS 00001632 137507
338888
5840.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
301.61
285109 6/8/2006
119824 ELIFEGUARD INC.
504.36
RESCUE TUBES, WHISTLES
137120
6131
5310.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
POOL ADMINISTRATION
504.36
285110 6/812006
105339 ENRGI
255.00
WEBSITE DEVELOPMENT
137121
4366
2210.6124
WEB DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNICATIONS
187.50
WEBSITE GRAPHICS
137122
4370
2210.6124
WEB DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNICATIONS
682.50
WEBSITE DEVELOPMENT
137399
4365
2210.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COMMUNICATIONS
1,125.00
285111 6/8/2006
116303 ETONIC WORLDWIDE LLC
69.28
SHOES
137123
48133
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
2,143.36
SHOES
137124
43912
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
1,216.02-
SHOE CREDIT
137125
90005039
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
_
996.62
6/7/2006 11:30:07 .
Page- 8
Business Unit
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
ED ADMINISTRATION
GENERAL TURF CARE
GENERAL TURF CARE
DISTRIBUTION
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
419.50 137263 82214 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
330.14 137444 82267 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
1,484.00 137445 82217 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
2,233.64
285119 61812006 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE
53.24 AIR COMPRESSOR 137551 060506 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
105.91 PLANTS 137551 060506 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
105.91 PLANTS 137551 060506 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
265.06
YORK OCCUPANCY
YORK OCCUPANCY
VERNON OCCUPANCY
CITY OF EDINA
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
6/8/2006
- 6/8/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier I Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
285112
61812006
100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS
COMPANY
201.38
PADS, ROTORS
00001217 137126
6- 827982
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
385.42
PADS, ROTORS
00001226 137127
1- 2440845
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
67.52-
CREDIT
00005156 137128
1- 2440321
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
67.52-
CREDIT
137554
1- 2444748
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
451.76
285113
6/8/2006
119211 FIRSTLAB
36.50
DRUG TEST
137334
140264
1550.6121
ADVERTISING PERSONNEL
328.50
DRUG TESTS
137335
146722
1550.6121
ADVERTISING PERSONNEL
365.00
285114
6/8 12006
102745 FREUND, JEFF
191.35
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
137400
060106
5610.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
191.35
285115
6/8/2006
103185. GERTENS
18.89
MULCH
00001081 137179
095192
1643.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
18.89
285116
6/8/2006
101344 GLENN REHBEIN COMPANIES
1,192.80
FERTILIZER
00001298 137336
9717
1643.6540
FERTILIZER
1,192.80
285117
6/812006
101103 GRAINGER
828.71
COMPRESSOR, OIL _
00001496 137180
9108741589
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
151.43
BATTERIES, SPOTLIGHTS
00001483 137181
9107743859
1552.6530
REPAIR PARTS
8.33
BLOW GUNS
00001499 137182
9108829111
1301.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
988.47
285118
6/8/2006
102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC
6/7/2006 11:30:07 .
Page- 8
Business Unit
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
ED ADMINISTRATION
GENERAL TURF CARE
GENERAL TURF CARE
DISTRIBUTION
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
419.50 137263 82214 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
330.14 137444 82267 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
1,484.00 137445 82217 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
2,233.64
285119 61812006 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE
53.24 AIR COMPRESSOR 137551 060506 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
105.91 PLANTS 137551 060506 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
105.91 PLANTS 137551 060506 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
265.06
YORK OCCUPANCY
YORK OCCUPANCY
VERNON OCCUPANCY
'
CITY OF
617G 1:30:07
R55CKREG . ,0000
_
Council Check Register
Page- 9
6/8/2006
-6/8/2006
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
285120 6/812006
100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC.
153.24
WIRE, CONNECTORS 00001411
137183
917610315
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
225.17
WIRE 00001473
137337
917734068
1322.6530
REPAIR PARTS
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
845.13
CONDUIT, ELBOWS 00001473
137338
917734069
1322.6530
REPAIR PARTS
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
1,223.54
285121 61812006
105769 GREATER TWIN CITIES TENNIS ASS
165.00
TENNIS WORKSHOP
137508
060206
1623.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
TENNIS INSTRUCTION
165.00
285122 6/8/2006
101350 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO.
232.44
IRRIGATION SERVICES 00001637
137184
061261
4091.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GRANDVIEW REVOLVING
232.44
285123 6/812006
101122 GREENSPRING MEDIA GROUP
41.66
MAGAZINE ADVERTISING
137509
MM43029
5822.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
50TH ST SELLING
41.66
MAGAZINE ADVERTISING
137509
MM43029
5842.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
YORK SELLING
41.68
MAGAZINE ADVERTISING
137509
MM43029
5862.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
VERNON SELLING
125.00
285124 6/8/2006
100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
1,825,27
137264
417193
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
181,17
137265
417199
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
1,212,02
137266
417198
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
70.79
137267
416141
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
508.70
137267
416141
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
235.08
137268
417201
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
2,445.90
137269
417055
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
928,71
137270
417202
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
241,26
137271
694316
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
2,445.90
137446
417197
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
4,442.35
137447
417200
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
114.00-
137448
674834
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
40.00-
137449
676827
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
67,34
137450
417211
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
9,781.33
137451
417210
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
1,363.35
-
137452
417213
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
3,918.08
137453
417083
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
2,445.90
137454
417209
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
2,726.70
137455
417206
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
9,969.20
137456
414225
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
8,476.72
137457
417212
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
CITY OF EDINA
6/7/2006 11:30:07
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 10
6/8/2006
6/6/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
52,649.25
285125
61812006
102312 HARMON INC.
1,086.00
WINDOW REPAIR
00001595 137185
285024511
1646.6530
REPAIR PARTS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
1,086.00
285126
6/8/2006
119827 HEDLUND, JENNIFER
45.00
PARTIAL REFUND
137129
053006
5301.4532
SEASON TICKETS
AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES
45.00
285127
6/812006
101209 HEIMARK FOODS
205.44
MEAT PATTIES
137401
019229
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
205.44
285128
6/8/2006
101588 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE
390.00
FIRST AID TRAINING
00001088 137339
00112324
1640.6027
TRAINING
PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL
390.00
285129
6/8/2006
114507 HERMAN'S LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES
59.90
BRICK PAVERS
00002397 137402
024637
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
59.90
285130
6/8/2006
119763 HIGH SHINE CO INC
468.60
TILE SCRUBBING
137130
612
1551.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
CITY HALL GENERAL
468.60
285131
61812006
103753 HILLYARD INC.
146.65
CARPET CLEANER REPAIR
137403
7103592
5620.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
149.93
MICROMATIC REPAIR
- 137404
7103591
5620.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
78.65
SCRUBBER REPAIR
137405
7103590
5620.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
73.76
RESTROOM CLEANER
00002174 137406
1762565
5620.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
448.99
285132
6/8/2006
102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURI
476.06
FIELD STRIPE PAINT
00005874 137340
71730
1642.6544
LINE MARKING POWDER
FIELD MAINTENANCE
476.06
285133
6/812006
104375 HOHENSTEINS INC.
599.15
137272
389304
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
599.15
285134
618/2006
103302 HONEYWELL CONCERT BAND
CITY OF
6/7r 1:30:07
R55CKREG L- -10000
Page - 11
Council Check Register
6/8/2006
--6/8/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
40.00
PERFORMANCE 6/18/06
137497
060106
5610.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
ED ADMINISTRATION
40.00
285135
61812006
100267 HOPKINS WESTWIND BAND
100.00
PERFORMANCE 6/19/06
137498
060106
5610.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
ED ADMINISTRATION
100.00
285136
6/8/2006
102114 HUEBSCH
37.90
RUG SERVICE
137407
639428
5620.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
EDINBOROUGH PARK
37.90
285137
61812006
101426 HUGHES, GORDON
321.74
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
137341
060106
1120.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
ADMINISTRATION
321.74
285138
618/2006
100812 IAAO
175.00
DUES - RICK NELSON
137408
060206
1190.6105
DUES 6 SUBSCRIPTIONS
ASSESSING
175.00
285139
6 /8/2006
112628 ICEE COMPANY, THE
666.40
CONCESSION PRODUCT
137342
721372
5320.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
POOL CONCESSIONS
666.40
285140
6/812006
101714 IDENTISYS INC.
1,822.30
YMCKT COLOR RIBBONS
00007086 137510
110113
5310.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POOL ADMINISTRATION
1,822.30
285141
61812006
100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP.
59.62
PVC PIPE, COUPLINGS
00001625 137343
437519
1642.6530
REPAIR PARTS
FIELD MAINTENANCE
59.62
285142
6/8/2006
116191 INSTY - PRINTS
-
378.34
POOL POSTCARD
137131
73540
5310.6575
PRINTING
POOL ADMINISTRATION
378.34
265143
6/8/2006
100818 INTERSTATE POWER SYSTEMS INC
64.73
SERVICE KIT, SEAL
00001662 137511
00196356
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
64.73
285144
618/2006
101403 J -CRAFT
209.77
SOLENOID VALVE
00001227 137186
39605
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
209.77
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
6/8/2006 -6/8/2006
Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No
265145 6/8/2006 104198 JACK MCCLARD & ASSOCIATES INC.
114.23 TIRE GAUGE, CONE 00001228 137132 39823 1553.6406
114.23
285146 618/2006
2,362.00
2,362.00
285147 6/8/2006
39.41
220.46
259.87
102157 JEFF EWS & ASSOCIATES INC.
LIFEGUARD LICENSES 137133 20027921 5310.6103
100830 JERRY'S PRINTING
WEED SPRAYING FORMS 00001475 137187 36563 1643.6406
REGISTRATION FORMS 00007085 137535 36521 1600.6575
617/2006 11:30:07
Page - 12
Subledger Account Description Business Unit
GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL ADMINISTRATION
GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL TURF CARE
PRINTING PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
285149 6/812006
100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.
256.51
137273
1082306
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
321.76
137274
1082307
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
622.00
137275
1082305
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
321.76
137276
1082303
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
103.50-
137277
312255
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
317.59
137458
1084540
5862:5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
485.51
137459
1084548
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
743.92
137460
1084545
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
- VERNON SELLING
683.32
137461
1084531
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
93.26
137462
1084528
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1.03
137463
1084529
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,998.22
137464
1084538
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
57.03
137465
1084534
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
2,024.58
137466
1084533
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
3,773.08
137467
1082304
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
4,692.64
137468
1084535
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
34.02
137469
1084539
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
3,281.45
137470
1084536
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
110.02
137471
1081828
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
66.53
137472
1081827
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
252.59
137473
1084532
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
340.01
137474
1084537
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
233.68
137475
1084521
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
3,009.27
137476
1081569
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
23,616.28
285150 6/81'
100839 KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES
'
CITY O,
A
617, 11:30:07
R55CKREG _ _ ..,20000
-
Page - 13
Council Check
Register
6/8/2006
-6/8/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
36.86-
BALL BEARINGS
00001495 137344
V851899
7411.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PSTF OCCUPANCY
36.86
285151
6/8/2006
116295 KING PAR CORPORATION
478.21
MERCHANDISE
00006111 137543
2347408
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS -PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
478.21
285152
618/2006
103272 KOOLE, DIANE
189.46
CONFERENCE EXPENSE
137512
060106
1190.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
ASSESSING
189.46
285153
618/2006
100848 LABOR RELATIONS ASSOCIATES INC
154.00
CONSULTING
137345
050106
1120.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
154.00
285154
6/8/2006
119802 LAVENTURE, ANDREW
119.96
OUTDOOR CLOCKS
137188
053106
5310.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POOL ADMINISTRATION
119.96
285155
6/812006
100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
365.80
NUTS, SCREWS
00001426 137346
4466222
1325.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET NAME SIGNS
112.50
SCREWS, WRENCHES
00001426 137347
4466223
1325.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET NAME SIGNS
260.83
HOSE FITTINGS
00001426 137348
4466221
1325.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET NAME SIGNS
182.47
FITTINGS, HOSE CLAMPS
00001425 137513
4461841
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
921.60
285156
61812006
101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA
CITIES
9,887.35
DEDUCTIBLE
137349
040106
1550.6200
INSURANCE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
9,887.35
285157
6/812006
100855 LESCO INC.
1,056.99
WEED SPRAY
00001587 137189
14117706
1643.6546
WEED SPRAY
GENERAL TURF CARE
339.09
FLOWERS, MULCH, SEED
00001322 137553
13994715
5932.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL STORM SEWER
1,396.08
285158
618/2006
106301 LOFFLER COMPANIES INC.
62.72
COPIER USAGE
00001512 137350
152638
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
62.72
285159
618/2006
106672 LUGER, JEFF
55.34
DOG FOOD
137409
053106
5422.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
55.34
CITY OF EDINA
617/2006 11:30:07
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 14
6/8/2006
-- 6/8/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
285160
618/2006
119830 M & M TOOL& EQUIPMENT
225.00
REAMERS
00001511 137351
291381
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
225.00
285161
618/2006
100868 MARK VII SALES
2,201.20
137278
937506
5842.5514
COST OF.GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
80.20
137279
937507
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
71,20
137280
.936810
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
.03
137477
936928
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
2,556.10
137478
937358
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
5,745.65
137479
936809
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
1,127,98
137480
939415
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
2,183.32
137481
938504
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
13,965.68
285162
6/8/2006
101555 MARSHALL & SWIFT
12.00
SHIPPING & HANDLING
137410
060206
1190.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
ASSESSING
12.00
285163
6/8/2006
101146 MATRIX TELECOM INC.
65.45
137134
005404714
1550.6188
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
65.45
285164
61812006
105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS
2,254.00
TRIP TRANSPORTATION
137352
053006
1628.6103.07
TRIPS PROF SERVICES
SENIOR CITIZENS
2,254.00
285165
6/8/2006
-
101457 MEICHSNER, EARL -
108.14
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
137190
053006
1652.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
WEED MOWING
108.14
285166
61812006
101483 MENARDS
194.66
HAND TOOLS
00001479 137219
27520
1301.6556
TOOLS
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
118.11
PAINT & SUPPLIES
00008039 137353
27680
5511.6532
PAINT
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
35.67
PADLOCKS
00008043 137354
29714
5511.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
348.44
285167
6/812006
101987 MENARDS
117.12
PUMPS
00002400 137411
92055
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
_
38.30
DECK STAIN
00002391 137412
- 91252 _
5630.6532
PAINT
CENTENNIAL LAKES
56.11
HOSE, SPRAY WAND
00002176 137413 '
. 95231
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES .
EDINBOROUGH PP'
'
CITY O,
A
617. 11:30:07
R55CKREG .-i20000
Council Check Register
Page - 15
6/8/2006
- 6/8/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
211.53
285168
618/2006
100882 MERIT SUPPLY
412.18
CLEANERS, SOAP 00001469 137220
69550
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
502.89
TOWELS, TISSUE 00001478 137355
69575
1552.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
915.07
285169
6/8/2006
101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY
161.24
WHISKER PLUGS, PAINT 00001423 137221
91628
1642.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIELD MAINTENANCE
161.24
285170
6/8/2006
100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME
700.00
MCES PERMIT FEE 00001548 137356
825228
5915.6260
LICENSES & PERMITS
WATER TREATMENT
700.00
285171
61812006
100692 MIDWEST COCA -COLA EAGAN
508.80
137281
48159007
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
508.80
285172
6/812006
101890 MIDWEST VENDING INC
126.88
CANDY 00006338 137414
4543
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
126.88
285173
6/8/2006
100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER &
540.00
INSTALLED CONDUIT 00001634 137222
332834
1322.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
1,260.00
FOUNTAIN REPAIRS 00002002 137415
32835
5630.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
CENTENNIAL LAKES
1,800.00
285174
61812006
101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
35.00
HOSPITALITY FEE #50279 137135
116898
5110.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
35.00
HOSPITALITY FEE #50265 137136
116904
5310.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
POOL ADMINISTRATION
35.00
HOSPITALITY FEE #50245 137137
116892
4075.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
VANVALKENBURG
105.00
285175
6/812006
101645 MINNESOTA DEPT OF NATURAL RESO
424.93
TREE PLANTINGS 00005928 137361
20060461
1644.6541
PLANTINGS & TREES
TREES & MAINTENANCE
424.93
-
285176
6/8/2006
101376 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT
5,212.13
1° METERS 00005684 137223
0183295
5914.5516
COST OF GOODS SOLD METERS
TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR
5,212.13
CITY OF EDINA
6/7/2006 11:30:07
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 16
6/8/2006
-6/8/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
285177
6/8/2006
112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO.
596.40
ASPHALT EMULSION 00005924 137224
50247
1301.6518
BLACKTOP
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
596.40
285178
61812006
103240 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL
325.00
001477 -06 DUES 137357
040306
1120.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
ADMINISTRATION
325.00
285179
6/8/2006
101779 MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATIO
57.51
DESK BOOK 137358
INV221511
1120.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
ADMINISTRATION
57.51
285180
6/8/2006
-
100908 MINNESOTA WANNER
206.98
VALVE, SWITCH 00001591 137359
0068894 -IN
1643.6530
REPAIR PARTS
GENERAL TURF CARE
225.24
HOSES, FITTINGS 00001306 137360
0068828 -IN
1643.6530
REPAIR PARTS
GENERAL TURF CARE
432.22
285181
6/8/2006
119547 MOON, JENNI
73.22
CLOCKS, WASTEBASKETS 137514
060206
5310.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POOL ADMINISTRATION
73.22
285182
6/8/2006
106151 MOOS, BEVERLY
79.46
CONFERENCE EXPENSE 137515
060106
1190.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
ASSESSING
79.46
285183
6/8/2006
100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC.
201.26
IRRIGATION PARTS 00002399 137416
525200 -00
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
345.76
SOLENOIDS, VALVES 00001660 137516
525795 -00
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
163.18
COUPLINGS 00006482 137539
521162 -00
5422.6611
IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
710.20
285184
6/812006
105323 MTM RECOGNITION
616.26
WATCHES 137362
5157299
1513.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS
670.34
EMPLOYEE AWARDS 137363
5170459
1513.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS
2,217.16
EMPLOYEE AWARDS 137364
5172292
1513.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS
3,503.76
285185
6/8/2006
100916 MUZAK- NORTH CENTRAL
198.54
MUSIC SERVICES 137138
A659164
5630.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
CENTENNIAL LAKES
198.54
285186
61812006
100012 NATIONAL WATERWORKS INC.
R55CKREG _- ,320000
Check # Date
285187 618/2006
285188 6/8/2006
285189 618/2006
285190 6/8/2006
285191 6/8/2006
285192 618/2006 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY
1,188.45
197.25
120.00
1,505.70
285193 618/2006 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
172.00
272.65
169.18
659.01
3,605.38
2,442.32
27.68
1,149.91
137140 34774117
137225 27983090
137417 21022175
137285 2331885
137286 2331883
137287 2332252
137483 2333890
137484 2333889
137485 2333886
137486 2333887
137487 2333888
5421.5510
4075.5510
5430.5510
5862.5513
5862.5513
5862.5513
5862.5513
5862.5513
5842.5512
5842.5513
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD
COST OF GOODS SOLD
COST OF GOODS SOLD
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
6r, 11:30:07
Page - 17
Business Unit
COLLECTION SYSTEMS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
DISTRIBUTION
POOL CONCESSIONS
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
GRILL
VANVALKENBURG
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
CITY C
b4
Council Check Register
6/8/2006
--6/8/2006
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
61.51
PIPE FITTINGS
00001490 137365
3527536
5923.6530
REPAIR PARTS
61.51
100930 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO.
150.05
SCRAP TIRE DISPOSAL
00001238 137366
NW- 101762
1553.6583
TIRES & TUBES
112.44
TIRES
00001238 137367
NW- 101690
1553.6583
TIRES & TUBES
262.49
103578 OFFICE DEPOT
8.63
SPINDLE
00006280 137139
338074838 - 001
5410.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
8.63
100936 OLSEN COMPANIES
130.19
CHOPSAW, REPAIRS
00001329 137368
395188
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
130.19
100939 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC.
209.34
COOKIES
137369
7447862
5320.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
209.34
100347 PAUSTIS & SONS
1,195.92
137282
8110230 -IN
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
876.00
137283
8109928 -IN
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
1,048.73
137284
8110235 -IN
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
1 AM 00
137482
8110238 -IN
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
285192 618/2006 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY
1,188.45
197.25
120.00
1,505.70
285193 618/2006 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
172.00
272.65
169.18
659.01
3,605.38
2,442.32
27.68
1,149.91
137140 34774117
137225 27983090
137417 21022175
137285 2331885
137286 2331883
137287 2332252
137483 2333890
137484 2333889
137485 2333886
137486 2333887
137487 2333888
5421.5510
4075.5510
5430.5510
5862.5513
5862.5513
5862.5513
5862.5513
5862.5513
5842.5512
5842.5513
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD
COST OF GOODS SOLD
COST OF GOODS SOLD
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
6r, 11:30:07
Page - 17
Business Unit
COLLECTION SYSTEMS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
DISTRIBUTION
POOL CONCESSIONS
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
GRILL
VANVALKENBURG
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA 617/2006 11:30:07
Council Check Register Page - 18
6/8/2006 - 6/8/2006
I
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description.
Business Un t
1,455.40
137488
2333884
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
9,953.53
285194 618/2006
100119 PING
209.02
GOLF CLUBS
00006298 137548
8098643
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
512.21
GOLF CLUBS
00006298 137549
8095037
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
543.08
GOLF CLUBS
00006298 137550
8098077
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
1,264.31
285195 6/812006
101223 PLANET FORD
286.66
WHEEL ASSEMBLIES
00001225 137141
122249WFOW
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
11.96
PULLEY
00001216 137142
122172WFOW
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
79.88-
CORE RETURN
137143
CM121657WFOW
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
7.53
LEVER
00001514 137370
122317WFOW
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
226.27
285196 6/8/2006
100160 PLANET SOCCER
3,114.00
LIFEGUARD WARM -UPS
00007080 137418
JY08
5311.6201 _
LAUNDRY
POOL OPERATION
3,114.00
285197 6/8/2006
101110 POLLY NORMAN PHOTOGRAPHY
100.00
EMPLOYEE PHOTOS
137419
052306
2210.6408
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
COMMUNICATIONS
100.00
285198 6/8/2006
116396 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION
INC
824.14
METHANE, CO2
137517
318502
7413.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PSTF FIRE TOWER
824.14
285199 6/8/2006
100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY
1,195.01
137288
417205
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
72.65
137289
417196
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
2,858.32
137290
417195
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
888.15
137291
416439
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,043.21
137489
417214
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
623.32
137490
418134
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
6,680.66
285200 6/8/2006
102354 PRO GUARD SPORTS INC.
375.75
TAPE, TIP WAX, LACES
00008037 137371
260433
5510.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
ARENA ADMINISTRATION
375.75
285201 6/er
112097 PUMP & METER SERVICE INC.
•
CITY L
JA
R55CKREG -420000
Council Check Register
6/8/2006
- 6/8/2006
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
38.34
TANK GAUGE
137537
239195
5422.6530
38.34
285202 6/8/2006
104669 PURE BLUE
561.00
MERCHANDISE
137372
65707
5310.5510
76.00
LIFEGUARD SUITS
137518
65824
5311.6201
637.00
285203 6/8/2006
100971 QUALITY WINE
9.77-
137292
713032 -00
5840.5518
998.82
137292
713032.00
5842.5513
18,34-
137293
712802 -00
5840.5518
1,664.20
137293
712802 -00
5842.5513
49.39-
137294
712882 -00
5840.5518
2,488.88
137294
712882 -00
5842.5512
7.51-
137295
711049 -00
5860.5518
377.71
137295
711049 -00
5862.5512
65.73-
137296
712888 -00
5860.5518
3,313.77
137296
712888 -00
5862.5512
,01
137297
712642 -00
5862.5512
19,71-
137298
712641 -00
5860.5518
992.28
137298
712641 -00
5862.5512
15.09-
137299
712801 -00
5860.5518
1,534.31
137299
712801 -00
5862.5513
7,02-
137300
713033 -00
5860.5518
711.67
137300
713033 -00
5862.5513
3.60-
137301
711721 -00
5860.5518
364.61
137301
711721 -00
5862.5513
5.53-
137302
712807 -00
5820.5518
562.20
137302
712807 -00
5822.5513
20.48-
137303
712883 -00
5820.5518
1,035.64
137303
712883 -00
5822.5512
13,18-
137304
713047 -00
5820.5518
1,335.90
137304
713047 -00
5822.5513
33.00
137305
709304 -00
5842.5514
.76-
137306
710643 -00
5842.5512
15,178.89
285204 618/2006
101295 QUANTUM CLEANING
SERVICES
235.03
CARPET CLEANING
00008044 137373
12193
5511.6406
235.03
Subledger Account Description
REPAIR PARTS
61 11:30:07
Page - 19
Business Unit
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL ADMINISTRATION
LAUNDRY POOL OPERATION
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
YORK SELLING
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
YORK SELLING
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
YORK SELLING
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
VERNON SELLING
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
VERNON SELLING
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
VERNON SELLING
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
VERNON SELLING
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
VERNON SELLING
50TH STREET GENERAL
50TH ST SELLING
50TH STREET GENERAL
50TH ST SELLING
50TH STREET GENERAL
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
WEED SPRAY
ADVERTISING OTHER
ADVERTISING OTHER
ADVERTISING OTHER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
REPAIR PARTS
SAND GRAVEL & ROCK
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MATERIALS /SUPPLIES
6/7/2006 11:30:07
Page - 20
Business Unit
STREET REVOLVING
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
YORK OCCUPANCY
GENERAL TURF CARE
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
DISTRIBUTION
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
PLAYGROUND & THEATER
VANVALKENBURG
POOL OPERATION
STREET RENOVATION
Chemical Rm. Expansion -plant 4
243.37
CITY OF EDINA
R55CKREG LOG20000
285206
6/8/2006
116375 R.N.D. SIGNS
Council Check Register
6/8/2006 -- 6/8/2006
SIGNS, STAKES
Check # Date Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
285205 6/8/2006
101965 OWEST
54.82
952 929 -0297
137519
0297 -5/06 4090.6188
TELEPHONE
96.48
952927 -8861
137520
8861 -5/06 1550.6188
TELEPHONE
92.07
952 929 -9549
137521
9549 -5/06 5841.6188
TELEPHONE
WEED SPRAY
ADVERTISING OTHER
ADVERTISING OTHER
ADVERTISING OTHER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
REPAIR PARTS
SAND GRAVEL & ROCK
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MATERIALS /SUPPLIES
6/7/2006 11:30:07
Page - 20
Business Unit
STREET REVOLVING
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
YORK OCCUPANCY
GENERAL TURF CARE
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
DISTRIBUTION
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
PLAYGROUND & THEATER
VANVALKENBURG
POOL OPERATION
STREET RENOVATION
Chemical Rm. Expansion -plant 4
243.37
285206
6/8/2006
116375 R.N.D. SIGNS
145.00
SIGNS, STAKES
00001299
137226
44964
1643.6546
145.00
285207
6/8/2006
113422 RAKE PUBLISHING INC.
200.00
MAGAZINE ADVERTISING
137522
8610
5822.6122
200.00
MAGAZINE ADVERTISING
137522
8610
5842.6122
200.00
MAGAZINE ADVERTISING
137522
8610
5862.6122
600.00
285208
6/8/2006
102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED
447.04
HITCHES, PINTLES
00001476
137227
1166400 -01
1552.6406
51.62-
CREDIT
137523
1559788 -01
1553.6530
395.42
285209
618/2006
100987 SA -AG INC
168.37
SAND
00001402
137144
49001
5913.6517
168.37
285210
6/8/2006
111605 SABERTOOTH GOLF
675.56
SAND TRAP RAKES
00006458
137538
.4865
5422.6406
675.56
285211
6/8/2006
100988 SAFETY KLEEN
127.96
CHANGE OUT PARTS WASHER
00001654
137374
0031676419
1553.6103
127.96
285212
6/8/2006
101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT
5.38
101 - 26373069350
137375
060106
1624.6406
44.26
101- 26373069350
137375
060106
4075.5510
49.64
285213
6/8/2006
105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER
CO.
101.28
LUMBER
00001291
137376
40304027
5311.6406
_
109.55
LUMBER
00001484
137524
40308171
1314.6406
- 151.13
LUMBER, INSULATION
00001395
137525
40302683
05453.1705.31
WEED SPRAY
ADVERTISING OTHER
ADVERTISING OTHER
ADVERTISING OTHER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
REPAIR PARTS
SAND GRAVEL & ROCK
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MATERIALS /SUPPLIES
6/7/2006 11:30:07
Page - 20
Business Unit
STREET REVOLVING
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
YORK OCCUPANCY
GENERAL TURF CARE
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
DISTRIBUTION
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
PLAYGROUND & THEATER
VANVALKENBURG
POOL OPERATION
STREET RENOVATION
Chemical Rm. Expansion -plant 4
CITY Ol,
6/71. 11:30:07
R55CKREG L. X20000
Council Check Register
Page - 21
6/8/2006
—6/8/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
361.96
285214
6/8/2006
119591 SCIPIONI, CHRISTINA
27.72
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 137146
053006
2210.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
COMMUNICATIONS
27.72
285215
6/8/2006
101893 SCS INTERACTIVE INC.
1,870.00
HANDWHEELS 00007066 137145
5916
5311.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POOL OPERATION
1,870.00
285216
618/2006
102644 SEABOARD PENCIL COMPANY
544.55
PENCILS 00006278 137420
5875
5430.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
541.80
PENCILS 00006277 137421
5873
5410.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
1,086.35
285217
618/2006
101587 SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES
1,339.00
DIAL -A -RIDE MARCH 2006 137536
053006
1514.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
DIAL -A -RIDE PROGRAM
1,339.00
285218
6/8/2006
116533 SHRM
160.00
MEMBERSHIP DUES 137377
9000659763
1120.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
ADMINISTRATION
160.00
285219
6/8/2006
119825 SOULIS, DAVID
650.00
AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 137147
053006
1470.4329
AMBULANCE FEES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
650.00
285220
6/8/2006
116682 SPECIALTY WINES & BEVERAGES
795.00
137307
8656
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
10.00-
137308
7543
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
785.00
285221
6/812006
101021 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC
104.89
GAS 00001636 137228
0101459
1553.6581
GASOLINE
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
104.89
285222
61812006
103658 ST. LOUIS PARK COMMUNITY BAND
75.00
PERFORMANCE 6/21106 137500
060106
5610.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
ED ADMINISTRATION
75.00
- 285223
6/8/2006
100650 STANLEY SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC
90.29
KEYS 00001381 137229
MN- 408068
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
6/7/2006 11:30:07
Page- 22
Business Unit
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
50.63
MERCHANDISE 137542 08546935 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
50.63
285231 6/812006
CITY OF EDINA
95.00
R55CKREG LOG20000
95.00
-
285232 6/8/2006
112362 TEAM LABORATORY CHEMICAL CORP.
175.19
WEED KILLER 00001310 137232 68377 1643.6546 WEED SPRAY GENERAL TURF CARE
175.19
Council Check Register
6/8/2006 - 6/8/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
90.29
285224
6/812006
101708 STATE OF MINNESOTA - CPV PROGR
500.00
MEMBERSHIP
137230
060106
1553.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
500.00
285225
6/8/2006
103418 STEFANIK, ESPERANZA
42.00
PROGRAM REFUND
137526
060206
1600.4390.02
TENNIS PROGRAM
42.00
285226
6/812006
101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
127.82
MIRRORS
00001442 137148
441209CVW
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
54.10
CAP ASSEMBLY
00001508 137149
440882 -1CVW
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
57.29-
CREDIT
00001486 137150
CM430693CVW
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
14.87
INSERTS
00001513 137378
441418 -1
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
139.50
285227
6/812006
105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC.
412.67
TIRES
00001223 137151
10053602
1553.6583
TIRES & TUBES
429.66
TIRES
00001222 137379
10053581
1553.6583
TIRES & TUBES
842.33
285228
6/8/2006
119828 SWEENEY, CHRIS
40.00
REFUND
137231
053106
5301.4532
SEASON TICKETS
40.00
285229
6/8/2006
101027 TARGET
366.03
ACCT 9- 555- 029 -840
00006285 137152
CAMERA, TAPES
5410.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
366.03
285230
618/2006
104932 TAYLOR MADE
6/7/2006 11:30:07
Page- 22
Business Unit
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
50.63
MERCHANDISE 137542 08546935 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
50.63
285231 6/812006
118139 TCHRA
95.00
ANNUAL DUES 137380 040306 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION
95.00
-
285232 6/8/2006
112362 TEAM LABORATORY CHEMICAL CORP.
175.19
WEED KILLER 00001310 137232 68377 1643.6546 WEED SPRAY GENERAL TURF CARE
175.19
6/71. 11:30:07
Page - 23
Business Unit
ED ADMINISTRATION
PATHS & HARD SURFACE
PATHS & HARD SURFACE
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
POOL OPERATION
POOL OPERATION
POOL OPERATION
POOL OPERATION
141.69
137309
411498
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
CITY OF
2,530.45
137310
R55CKREG L—. 20000
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
34.00
137423
22603
5421.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
GRILL
6,285.20
137491
Council Check Register
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
6200
137492
412318
6/8/2006
—6/8/2006
VERNON SELLING
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
285233
6/8/2006
285241
117686 TECHNA GRAPHICS
100682 TRUGREEN- CHEMLAWN
1,788.14
ENTERTAINMENT CALENDARS
00002003 137422
601230 -01
5610.6575
PRINTING
1,788.14
285234
61812006
113549 TENNIS WEST
3,946.00
BACKSTOP WORK
00001276 137233
06 -205
1647.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
3,950.00
BACKSTOP WORK
00001609 137527
06 -220
1647.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
7,896.00
285235
6/8/2006
101326 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO
122.20
FLASHERS, WIRE
00001212 137153
22027 -00
1553.6585
ACCESSORIES
431.17
FUSES, CONNECTORS
00001212 137154
21725 -00
1553.6585
ACCESSORIES
553.37
285236
61812006
105123 THEMESCAPES, INC.
1,134.00
ROOFTOP THATCHING
137381
206108 -1
5311.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
500.00
WATER CANNON INSTALLATION
137382
206115 -1
5311.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
100.00
PIRATE CAPTION
137383
206114 -1
5311.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
1,207.50
MULCH
137384
206113 -1
5311.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
2,941.50
285237
6/8/2006
101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
6/71. 11:30:07
Page - 23
Business Unit
ED ADMINISTRATION
PATHS & HARD SURFACE
PATHS & HARD SURFACE
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
POOL OPERATION
POOL OPERATION
POOL OPERATION
POOL OPERATION
141.69
137309
411498
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
2,530.45
137310
411497
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
34.00
137423
22603
5421.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
GRILL
6,285.20
137491
412316
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
6200
137492
412318
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
POOL OPERATION
DISTRIBUTION
9,053.34
285238
618/2006
118807 TIME WARNER CABLE
53.17
ACCT 037910101 00008048 137557 052606 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
53.17
285239
618/2006
101037 TOIVONEN PAINTING
6,317.17
PAINTING 00007090 137528 053106 5311.6532 PAINT
6,317.17
285240
6/8/2006
101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY
211.96
PROPANE 00001713 137385 117199 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
211.96
285241
6/8/2006
100682 TRUGREEN- CHEMLAWN
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
POOL OPERATION
DISTRIBUTION
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/7/2006 11:30:07
Council Check Register Page - 24
6/8/2006 - 6/8/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
53.25
WEED CONTROL
00001601 137386
353190
1470.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
533.61
WEED CONTROL
00001602 137387
SEVERAL
1643.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
GENERAL TURF CARE
586.86
285242
6/812006
118190 TURFWERKS LLC
226.00
SPINDLE ASSEMBLY
00001220 137155
J173508
1553.6585
ACCESSORIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
226.00
285243
6/8/2006
101047 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO
550.39
PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE
00001661 137529
257908
1553.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
550.39
285244
6/8/2006
101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE
491.71
HINGE INSTALLATION
00001269 137388
175076
1646.6530
REPAIR PARTS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
491.71
285245
6/812006
100371 UNITED RENTALS
795.30
AIR POST DRIVER
00001278 137389
56157353 -001
1647.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PATHS & HARD SURFACE
795.30
285246
6/8/2006
114236 USA BLUE BOOK
784.10
HYDRANT METER
00001488 137390
172503
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
784.10
285247
6/8/2006
100050 LISPS - HASLER
4,000.00
ACCT #75983
137424
060106
1550.6235
POSTAGE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
4,000.00
285248
6/8 /2006
101058 VAN PAPER CO.
121.68
CUP LIDS
00006347 137156
635956
5421.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GRILL
269.95
BAGS, PLATES
00007512 137234 -
636804
5842.6512
PAPER SUPPLIES
YORK SELLING
15.09
FORKS, PLATES
00007513 137235
636800
5862.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
VERNON SELLING
275.57
BAGS \
00007513 137235
636800
5862.6512
PAPER SUPPLIES
VERNON SELLING
202.35
BAGS, ROLL TOWEL
137236
636801
5822.6512
PAPER SUPPLIES
50TH ST SELLING
66.83
CUP LIDS
00006347 137425
636533
5421.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GRILL
569.51
LINERS, TOWELS, CUPS
00006347 137426
636802
5421.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GRILL
60.44
HAND CLEANER
137530
636989
7412.6466
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PSTF RANGE
1,581.42
285249
6/812006
101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY
164.93
SPLICE KITS, ELBOWS
00001473 137391
9907789
1322.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
164.93
R55CKREG i-_ .c0000
CITY OF
Council Check Register
6/8/2006 - 6/8/2006
Check # Date Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Descnpbon
285250 618/2006
101069 VOSS LIGHTING
101075 WEIGLE, SUE
445.60
LIGHTING
00001471 137157
15046033 -00
1321.6530
REPAIR PARTS
541.48
LIGHTING
00001471 137157
15046033 -00
1322.6530
REPAIR PARTS
41254
LIGHTING
00001360 137237
15045151 -00
5311.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1600.6107
1600.4722.01
5862.5513
5822.5513
5842.5513
5842.5513
5862.5513
5424.6590
5424.6590
5424.6590
5424.6590
1504.6103
5862.5513
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
GENERAL PARK RENTAL
617/1 1:30:07
Page - 25
Business Unit
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
POOL OPERATION
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
RANGE BALLS
RANGE BALLS
RANGE BALLS
RANGE BALLS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
RANGE
RANGE
RANGE
RANGE
HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
1,399.62
285251
6/8/2006
101075 WEIGLE, SUE
399.61
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
137392
060106
399.61
285252
6/8/2006
119832 WEINBECK, MARIA
25.00
RENTAL REFUND
137427
060106
25.00
285253
6/8/2006
101033 WINE COMPANY, THE
450.90
137311
142565 -00
982.35
137312
142566 -00
1,642.95
137493
142562 -00
3,076.20
285254
6/8/2006
101312 WINE MERCHANTS
5,825.88
137494
158888
6,591.79
137495
158889
12,417.67
285255
6/812006
101082 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY
724.13
CLUB CLEANERS, PAILS 00006275
137158
148391
111.55
PLASTIC RANGE TRAYS 00006275
137159
148161
51.06
RANGE PAILS 00006092
137428
148728
191.70
MARKERS 00006092
137429
148929
1,078.44
285256
6/8/2006
102314 WOMEN IN TRANSITION
4,660.00
2006 FUNDING
.137160
052606
4,660.00
285257
61812006
101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC
711.50
137313
179495
711.50
285258
6/812006
101726 XCEL ENERGY
1600.6107
1600.4722.01
5862.5513
5822.5513
5842.5513
5842.5513
5862.5513
5424.6590
5424.6590
5424.6590
5424.6590
1504.6103
5862.5513
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
GENERAL PARK RENTAL
617/1 1:30:07
Page - 25
Business Unit
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
POOL OPERATION
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
RANGE BALLS
RANGE BALLS
RANGE BALLS
RANGE BALLS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
RANGE
RANGE
RANGE
RANGE
HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
285259 61812006 100568 XEROX CORPORATION
26.00 MAY USAGE - BLDG ENG 00004322_137531 017564720
551.99 MAY USAGE - ADMIN 00004060 137532 017564718
125.05 MAY USAGE - PARK & REC 00004322 137533 017564721
703.04
1550.6151
1550.6151
1550.6151
Subledger Account Description
394,142.83 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals
Check Total 394,142.83
Total Payments 394,142.83
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER -
LIGHT & POWER
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
6!7/2006 11:30:07
Page - 26
Business Unit
AQUATIC WEEDS
YORK FIRE STATION
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
GENERAL STORM SEWER
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
PONDS & LAKES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
POOL OPERATION
DISTRIBUTION
PSTF OCCUPANCY
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CITY OF
EDINA
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check'Register
6/8/2006
-- 6/8/2006
Check # Date Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
140.57
51- 5938955 -6
137161
70430479
4086.6185
116.13
51- 6229265 -9
137163
70436836
1481.6185
648.48
51- 6229265 -9
137163
70436836
1470.6185
214.31
51- 4156445-0
137164
70386395
5932.6185
506.92
51- 6046826 -0
137165
70431124
5422.6185
161.60
51- 5634814 -2,
137166
70422530
5933.6185
42.43
51- 6541084 -2
137167
70129936
1646.6185
28,922.09
51- 4621797 -2
137168
70243958
1321.6185
348.67
51- 6137136 -8
137169
70270870
5430.6185
475.46
51- 4827232 -6
137170
70247853
5311.6185
17,404.71
51- 5605640 -1
137238
70266334
5913.6185
1,876.54
51- 4159265 -8
137534
70009909
7411.6185
50,857.91
285259 61812006 100568 XEROX CORPORATION
26.00 MAY USAGE - BLDG ENG 00004322_137531 017564720
551.99 MAY USAGE - ADMIN 00004060 137532 017564718
125.05 MAY USAGE - PARK & REC 00004322 137533 017564721
703.04
1550.6151
1550.6151
1550.6151
Subledger Account Description
394,142.83 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals
Check Total 394,142.83
Total Payments 394,142.83
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER -
LIGHT & POWER
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
6!7/2006 11:30:07
Page - 26
Business Unit
AQUATIC WEEDS
YORK FIRE STATION
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
GENERAL STORM SEWER
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
PONDS & LAKES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
POOL OPERATION
DISTRIBUTION
PSTF OCCUPANCY
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
R55CKSUM Lt-,--%)000 CITY OF n 6 /7l. 11:31:34
Council Check Summary Page - 1
6/8/2006 - 6/8/2006
Company
01000 GENERAL FUND
02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND
04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND
05100 ART CENTER FUND
05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND
05400 GOLF COURSE FUND
05500 ICE ARENA FUND
05600 EDINBOROUGH/CENT LAKES FUND
05800 LIQUOR FUND
05900 UTILITY FUND
05930 STORM SEWER FUND
05950 RECYCLING FUND
07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND -
Amount
98,731.68
2,432.07
3,047.34
35.00
22,294.87
15,431.75
2,185.79
5,515.60
204,370.08
35,901.50
715.00
50.00
3,432.15
Report Totals 394,142.83
We confirm to the best of our b w~
and belief, that these chime
comply in all material respects
with the requirements of the M
of Edina purchasing ides and
procedures dat (® , w_,
6/13/2(, .45:10
CITY OF EDP, ...
R55CKREG LOG20000
Page - 1
Council Check Register
6/15/2006 - 6/15/2006
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
285260 611512006
100613 AAA
137926
060906
1553.6260
LICENSES &PERMITS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1,201.30
PLATES, TITLE FOR 26.190
1,201.30
285261 611512006
102403 AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT
25.97
BLACK DIRT 00001606 137927
25370
1643.6543
SOD & BLACK DIRT
GENERAL TURF CARE
25.97
285262 6/15/2006
102971 ACE ICE COMPANY
137703
464340
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
131.80
137704
606318
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
49.54
137705
464168
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
81.00
137706
464339
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
24.28
137707
472902
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
146.36
137708
472909
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
16.28
137709
472888
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
21.12
470.38
285263 6115/2006
102191 ADVANCED GRAPHIC SYSTEMS INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
1,090.55
TONER CARTRIDGES 137928
INV00069066
1400.6406
1,090.55
285264 611512006
102626 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES
CONCRETE
DISTRIBUTION
571.11
READY MIX 00005917 137559
4151432
5913.6520
674.94
READY MIX 00005917 137561
4151197
5913.6520
CONCRETE
DISTRIBUTION
830.70
READY MIX 00005917 137562
4151196
5913.6520
CONCRETE
DISTRIBUTION
311.51
READY MIX 00005917 137563
4151010
5913.6520
CONCRETE
DISTRIBUTION
1,246.06
READY MIX 00005917 137762
4152132
1314.6520
CONCRETE
STREET RENOVATION
3,634.32
285265 611512006
105262 ALEX AIR APPARATUS INC.
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
4,260.30
HOSE REEL REPAIRS 137648
10689
1470.6180
4,260.30
285266 6/1512006
119862 ALLIANCE MEDICAL
1400.4214
STATE GRANT
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
2,035.64
BUFFER ZONE PROTECTION PLAN 00003137 137929
580452
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
1,700.00
BUFFER ZONE PROTECTION PLAN 00003137 137930
584020
1400.4214
STATE GRANT
3,735.64
285267 611512006
100058 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #894
RECYCLING CHARGES
RECYCLING
33,958.00
RECYCLING 137763
0894000472878
5952.6183
33,958.00
R55CKREG LOG20000
6/15/2006
CITY OF EDINA
101601
AMUNDSON, ERIK
COST OF
Council Check Register
SOLD
5421.5510
75.00
6/15/2006 -- 6/15/2006
MEMBERSHIP
Check # Date Amount
Supplier / Explanatlon PO # Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
285268 6/15/2006
101829 AMERICAN SANDBLASTING INC.
137937
060606
28,500.00
SANDBLAST & PAINT POOL 00007059 137649
CE06022006 5311.6532
PAINT
28,500.00
137938
052506
285269 6115/2006
101115 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER
579.54
137931
6200 -5/06 1470.6201
LAUNDRY
124.87
137932
35314 -5106 5861.6201
LAUNDRY
46.69
137933
35334 -5/06 5821.6201
LAUNDRY
107.62
137934
35320 -5/06 5841.6201
LAUNDRY
108.02
137935
59056 -5106 1470.6201
LAUNDRY
450.17
137936
46 -5/06 1551.6201
LAUNDRY
285270
6/15/2006
GOODS
101601
AMUNDSON, ERIK
COST OF
GOODS
SOLD
5421.5510
75.00
ANNUAL
MEMBERSHIP
137937
060606
GOODS
SOLD
350.00
CONFERENCE FEE
137937
060606
285.00
TUITION
REIMBURSEMENT
137938
052506
710.00
285271
6/15/2006
101874
ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC.
537.83
PAGER
00003600
137650
43375
537.83
285272
6/15/2006
102109
ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER
886.80
RADIO INSTALLATION
137651
69061
886.80
285273
6115/2006
118989
ANDERSON, CHERYL
15.00
USABILITY TESTING SUPPLIES
138021
061206
15.00
285274
6115/2006
102172
APPERT'S FOODSERVICE
866.33
FOOD
00006333
137564
580571
41.50-
CREDIT
137565
574625
39.25-
CREDIT
137566
578118
48.54-
CREDIT
137567
569064
737.04
285275
6115/2006
103680
ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS
192.27
COFFEE
137652
402029
192.27
1400.6105
1400.6104
1400.6104
1470.6406
1470.6180
2210.6406
6/13/2006 10:45:10
Page - 2
Business Unit
POOL OPERATION
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
VERNON OCCUPANCY
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
YORK OCCUPANCY
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
CITY HALL GENERAL
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
5421.5510
COST OF
GOODS
SOLD
5421.5510
COST OF
GOODS
SOLD
5421.5510
COST OF
GOODS
SOLD
5421.5510
COST OF
GOODS
SOLD
1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
COMMUNICATIONS
GRILL
GRILL
GRILL
GRILL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CITY OF EDINA
6/13/20u.. „x45:10
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 3
6/15/2006
6/15/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
285276
611512006
101977 ARCH WIRELESS
10.97
PAGER
137764
P6096083F
1550.6188
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
10.97
285277
6/1512006
102754 ARNT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC
4,379.58
GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION
138008
FIVE
4401.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR
4,379.58
285278
6115/2006
100634 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO.
1,397.44
BLADE STRUCTURE, MOLDBOARD
1911005620 137620
10003558
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
718.87
SADDLE BOX, BACKRACK
00005623 137621
10003557
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
279.03
LADDER RACK
00005615 137809
10003607
1553.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
279.03
BACKRACK
00005615 137810
10003608
5932.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL STORM SEWER
2,674.37
285279
611512006
102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS
154.29
WASTE/RECYCLING
1- 146354 137765
060106
7411.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
PSTF OCCUPANCY
154.29
285280
6/1512006
119867 ATOMIC ARCHITECTURAL SHEET MET
85,975.00
GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION
138009
ONE
4401.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR
85,975.00
285281
6/15/2006
100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO.
2,006.53
SANITARY SEWER STUDY
137653
2327G13 -4
5923.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
COLLECTION SYSTEMS
2,143.26
ADDITIONAL FIELD SURVEY
137654
2327354 -139
04323.1705.20
CONSULTING DESIGN
STS -323 WEBER POND STORM WATER
15,904.55
SANITARY SEWER MODELING
137655
2327G13 -5
5923.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
COLLECTION SYSTEMS
20,054.34
285282
6115/2006
102195 BATTERIES PLUS
21.29
REBUILD KIT
00003603 137657
18- 148512
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
21.29
285283
6/1512006
101245 BELL, BRUCE
150.00
PERFORMANCE 6/22/06
137803
060106
5610.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
ED ADMINISTRATION
150.00
285284
611512006
101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION
1,659.00
137710
37280900
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
137711
37280600
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
208.00
137865
37318900
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
354.03
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/13/2006 10:45:10
Council Check Reglster Page - 4
6/1512006 - 6/15/2006
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
160.80
137866
37318800
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
2,381.83
285285 6/15/2006
119213 BENTLEY, MACHELL
316.03
UNIFORM PURCHASE
137939
060906
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
316.03
285286 6/15/2006
104656 BERGREN, JENNIFER
100.00
PROGRAM STAFF
138029
060906
1629.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ADAPTIVE RECREATION
100.00
285287 6/15/2006
100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS
30.22
OFFICE SUPPLIES
137568
WO- 407023 -1
1190.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ASSESSING
7.00
MARKERS
137569
WO- 406756 -2
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
63.60
OFFICE SUPPLIES
137570
WO- 406756 -1
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
112.98
OFFICE SUPPLIES
137571
WO- 406089 -1
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
23.58-
RETURN
137572
CP- WO- 402349 -1
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
162.63
BINDERS
137658
WO- 406040 -1
1190.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ASSESSING
36.48
STAPLERS
00001681 137811
WO- 407120 -1
1640.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL
66.32
OFFICE SUPPLIES
00003014 137940
WO- 406784 -1
1400.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
150.34
OFFICE SUPPLIES
00003601 138030
OE- 56654 -1
1470.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
48.47
OFFICE SUPPLIES
00007102 138031
W0 -407786 -1
1600.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
654.46
285288 6/15/2006
102392 BLACK, STEVE
255.75
OFFICIATING FEES
138023
060906
4077.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
255.75
285289 6/15/2006
119431 BLINK BONNIE
79.10
BOX LUNCHES
137656
051706
1100.6106
MEETING EXPENSE
CITY COUNCIL
79.10
285290 6/15/2006
100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS
187.75
ROD ASSEMBLY
00001229 137941
875226
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
187.75
285291 6115/2006
101516 BRAEMAR PRINTING
74.41
GOLF COURSE CARDS
00006209 137573
00029110
5430.6575
PRINTING
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
74.41
285292 6/1512006
101366 BRENTS SIGNS
50.59
SIGN
00006210 137574
06 -01 -16 -166
0.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
RICHARDS GOLF COURI-
6/13f- 10:45:10
Page- 5
Business Unit
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
PARKING RAMP
STREET REVOLVING
40,763.00
GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION
138010
FIVE
CITY OF EDINA
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
R55CKREG LOG20000
40,763.00
285296 6/15/2006
Council Check Register
5,447.25
6/15/2006 - 6/15/2006
137712
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
137713
100789
50.59
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
5,850.50
285293
6115/2006
100667 BROCK WHITE COMPANY
285297 6/15/2006
119860 CAR TRUCK CITY AND GMAC
137.03
TROWELS, EDGERS
00001626 137622
11507175 -00 1301.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
17,981.50
2006 CHEV IMPALA
416.80
TOP COAT
00001626 137623
11507160 -00 1375.6530
REPAIR PARTS
17,981.50
553.83
285294
611512006
119847 BROWN, HEATHER
45.00
COLLECT TRASH AT ART FAIR
137755
060706 4090.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
45.00
9.16
FITTINGS, O -RINGS
00001518 137943
285295
6/15/2006
REPAIR PARTS
119466 CAMELOT METALS
183.03
COUPLERS, FITTINGS
6/13f- 10:45:10
Page- 5
Business Unit
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
PARKING RAMP
STREET REVOLVING
40,763.00
GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION
138010
FIVE
4401.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR
40,763.00
285296 6/15/2006
119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES
5,447.25
137712
100794
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
403.25
137713
100789
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
5,850.50
285297 6/15/2006
119860 CAR TRUCK CITY AND GMAC
17,981.50
2006 CHEV IMPALA
00003087 137942
11030
1400.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
17,981.50
285298 6/15/2006
100681 CATCO
11.29
FITTINGS
00005182 137624
3 -03243
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
9.16
FITTINGS, O -RINGS
00001518 137943
1 -12361
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
183.03
COUPLERS, FITTINGS
00001518 137944
3 -05275
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
28.51
HYDRAULIC FITTINGS
00001518 137945
6 -61118
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
50.41
CONNECTORS
00001518 137946
10 -24347
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
188.08
FITTINGS
00001518 137947
7 -33868
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
8.82
PINS
00001518 137948
3 -05112
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
479.30
285299 6115/2006
102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC.
1,131.02
COLOR PRINTER SUPPLIES
00003180 137949
ZKO1686
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
1,131.02
285300 6/15/2006
101515 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO.
87.00
EDGER. GROOVER
00001498 137766
1092449
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
87.00
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF
EDINA
Council Check Register
6/15/2006
-- 6115/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
285301
6/15/2006
112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY
10.33
137863
060506
5821.6186
HEAT
30.15
137863
060506
5841.6186
HEAT
40.08
137863
060506
5861.6186
HEAT
47.97
137863
060506
5422.6186
HEAT
62.71
137863
060506
1552.6186
HEAT
67.61
137863
060506
5430.6186
HEAT
81.59
137863
060506
1481.6186
HEAT
199.26
137863
060506
5630.6186
HEAT
445.92
137863
060506
5420.6186
HEAT
538.62
137863
060506
5111.6186
HEAT
654.23
137863
060506
1470.6186
HEAT
786.34
137863
060506
1628.6186
HEAT
959.06
137863
060506
5911.6186
HEAT
1,642.17
137863
060506
5913.6186
HEAT
1,801.13
137863
060506
1646.6186
HEAT
1,926.31
137863
060506
5210.6186
HEAT
6,613.02
137863
060506
5511.6186
HEAT
15,906.50
285302
6/15/2006
118854 CENTRAL TRANSPORT
175.00
SHIPPING CHARGES 00008049
137767
611 - 393998
5511.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
175.00
285303
6/15/2006
117187 CHEM SYSTEMS LTD
997.48
WATER TEST KITS 00008006
137768
513403
5511.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
997.48
285304
6/15/2006
116353 CHIPPEWA GRAPHICS INC.
181.85
ENVELOPES 00008047
137575
12076
5510.6575
PRINTING
181.85
285305
6/15/2006
119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO
77.95
137714
313225
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
80.00
137715
313935
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
157.95
285306
611512006
101663 CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF
60.00
DUES - WAYNE HOULE
137950
060906
1240.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
60.00
285307
6/15120
119866 CLINTON, BETH
6/13/2006 10:45:10
Page - 6
Business Unit
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
YORK OCCUPANCY
VERNON OCCUPANCY
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
YORK FIRE STATION
CENTENNIAL LAKES
CLUB HOUSE
ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
SENIOR CITIZENS
PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER
DISTRIBUTION
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
ARENA ADMINISTRATION.
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL
CITY OF EUINA
6/131— —10:45:10
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 7
6/15/2006
-- 6/15/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
12.20
SEASON TICKET REFUND 138032
061206
5300.2039
SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE
AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET
187.80
SEASON TICKET REFUND 138032
061206
5301.4532
SEASON TICKETS
AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES
200.00
285308
6115/2006
104928 CONCRETE CUTTING & CORING INC.
656.79
CHAINS, BLADES 00003599 137812
57449
1470.6530
REPAIR PARTS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
144.65
CHAINS 00003599 137813
57450
1470.6530
REPAIR PARTS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
801.44
285309
6/15/2006
116356 CONSTRUCTION MIDWEST INC.
179.19
HAMMERS, KNIVES, BLADES 00001629 137769
360970
1301.6556
TOOLS
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
281.85
EPDXY COATING 00001629 137769
360970
1375.6530
REPAIR PARTS
PARKING RAMP
461.04
285310
6/1512006
119839 CORNEJO CONSULTING
4,400.00
PLANNING CONSULTANT 137576
060106
1140.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PLANNING
4,400.00
285311
6/15/2006
101590 CORNERSTONE
3,750.00
1ST QUARTER FUNDING 137577
051606
1504.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION
3,750.00
285312
6/1512006
100513 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES IN
2,742.38
CUSTODIAL SERVICES 137578
107929
1551.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CITY HALL GENERAL
2,742.38
285313
6/15/2006
100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER
48.37
ACCT 114 - 09855685 -4 137770
669418
7413.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PSTF FIRE TOWER
48.37
285314
6/15/2006
100706 D.C. ANNIS SEWER INC.
477.00
PUMP SUMP 137659
50427
1470.6215
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
477.00
285315
6/15/2006
101581 DAKOTA COUNTY TECHNICAL COLLEG
1,500.00
EMERGENCY DRIVER TRAINING 137660
44063
1470.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1,500.00
EMERGENCY DRIVER TRAINING 137661
44064
1470.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1,650.00
EMERGENCY DRIVER TRAINING 137662
43989
1470.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
4,650.00
285316
6/15/2006
102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING
365121
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
39.60
137716
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/13/2006 10:45:10
Council Check Register Page - 8
COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL
SURCHARGE INSPECTIONS
TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS
PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS
GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET REVOLVING
GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET REVOLVING
GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER
GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIE" ')MM CTR
6/15/2006
— 6/15/2006
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
1,795.05
137717
365120
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
3,473.00
137718
365122
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
59.40
137719
365123
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
22.50
137720
365124
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
3,136.80
138043
365119
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL
SURCHARGE INSPECTIONS
TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS
PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS
GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET REVOLVING
GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET REVOLVING
GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER
GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIE" ')MM CTR
8,526.35
285317
6115 12006
100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY
34.13
BAKERY 137579
216651
5421.5510
34.13
285318
6/15/2006
100899 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY
4,854.78
MAY 2006 138033
060606
1495.4380
4,854.78
285319
6/1512006
101675 DESHLER, BRANDON
127.50
CELL PHONE CHARGES 137951
060906
1400.6188
127.50
285320
611512006
100571 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS
356.78
PAINT 00001187 138057
802081691
1335.6532
2,325.43
PAINT 00001259 138058
802082032
1335.6532
2,682.21
285321
6/1512006
119851 DIEKMAN, BETHANY
215.00
COLLECT TRASH AT ART FAIR 137756
060706
4090.6406
215.00
285322
6/15/2006
119850 DIEKMAN, MARLENE
300.00
COLLECT TRASH AT ART FAIR 137757
060706
4090.6406
300.00
285323
6/15/2006
100296 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY
330.30
CRAFT SUPPLIES 137814
D06116190001
1624.6406
330.30
285324
6/15/2006
119865 DISTRICT SUPPLY CENTER
459.85
TONER-PARKS 00004116 138034
3241
1550.6406
459.85
285325
6115/2006
119120 DONLAR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
23,060.41
GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION 138011
SEVEN
101.6710
COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL
SURCHARGE INSPECTIONS
TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS
PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS
GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET REVOLVING
GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET REVOLVING
GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER
GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIE" ')MM CTR
6,990.22
285328 6115/2006 100741 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
107.50
GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCT
CITY OF EDINA
667952
R55CKREG LOG20000
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
8,115,12
138044
320488
Council Check Register
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
8,222.62
MASKS & VENTS 137816 6444 5310.6610
6115/2006 — 6/15/2006
POOL ADMINISTRATION
Check # Date Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
23,060.41
100748 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY
285326 6115/2006
101747 DRESSER TRAP ROCK INC.
137815
052606
834.33
FA -2 00005919 137580
58853 1314.6517
SAND GRAVEL & ROCK
834.33
105944 EMANUEL, LOU
285327 6115/2006
100739 EAGLE WINE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
552.57
137721
421093 5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
2,210.61
137867
421097 5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
526.75
137868
410590 5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
138.64
137869
418543 5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
3 561 65
137870
421088 5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
6,990.22
285328 6115/2006 100741 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
107.50
GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCT
137722
667952
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
8,115,12
138044
320488
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
8,222.62
MASKS & VENTS 137816 6444 5310.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
POOL ADMINISTRATION
67.63
285329 6115/2006
104645 EDINA GARDEN COUNCIL
285333 611512006
100748 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY
92.80
FLOWERS FOR GRANDVIEW 00001621
137815
052606
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
92.80
285334 611512006
105944 EMANUEL, LOU
285330 6/15/2006
116448 EGAN OIL COMPANY
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
325.50
20,290.66
GASOLINE
137771
124055
1553.6581
GASOLINE
20,290.66
285331 6/15/2006
119119 ELECTRONIC RESOURCE CONTRACTOR
6/13/x- 10:45:10
Page- 9
.Business Unit
STREET RENOVATION
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
ION 138012 SEVEN 4401 6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR
19,947.15
GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCT
19,947.15
285332 6/1512006
119824 ELIFEGUARD INC.
67.63
MASKS & VENTS 137816 6444 5310.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
POOL ADMINISTRATION
67.63
285333 611512006
100748 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY
127.21
NITRILE GLOVES 00001321 137581 288000 -00 5923.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COLLECTION SYSTEMS
127.21
285334 611512006
105944 EMANUEL, LOU
325.50
OFFICIATING FEES 138024 060906 4077.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
325.50
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
6/13 /2006 10:45:10
Council Check Register
Page - 10
6/15/2006
— 6/15/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
285335
6/15/2006
102309 EMBEDDED SYSTEMS INC.
2,079.00
SIREN MAINTENANCE FEE
137952
31410
1460.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
CIVILIAN DEFENSE
2,079.00
285336
611512006
106213 EMSAR TWIN CITIES
1,421.56
COT MAINTENANCE
137663
10235
1470.6215
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1,111.14
COT MAINTENANCE
137664
10274
1470.6215
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
2,532.70
285337
6/1512006
105339 ENRGI
571.25
WEBSITE DEVELOPMENT
137582
4379
2210.6124
WEB DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNICATIONS
571.25
285338
6/15/2006
100752 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC.
1,908.48
CASTINGS
00005926 137772
JJ2450
5932.6536
CASTINGS
GENERAL STORM SEWER
1,908.48
285339
6/15/2006
100018 EXPERT T BILLING
5,677.20
MAY TRANSPORTS
137625
060506
1470.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
5,677.20
285340
6/15/2006
102497 EXPLORER POST 925
5,000.00
CONFERENCE
137953
060806
1419.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
RESERVE PROGRAM
5,000.00
285341
6/15/2006
100297 FAST FOTO & DIGITAL
10.66
PHOTO FINISHING
00003532 137665
3532 T2- 225057
1470.6408
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
21.30
PHOTO FINISHING
00003532 137666
3532 T2- 224596
1470.6408
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
31.96
285342
6/15/2006
100756 FEDERAL EXPRESS
32.93
SHIPPING CHARGES
137954
1- 051 -21712
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
32.93
285343
6/1512006
103600 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.
16.32
HAT LIGHT
00001589 137817
0824999
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
484.96
TOILETS
00001589 137818
0825003
1646.6530
REPAIR PARTS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
501.28
285344
6/1512006
119849 FISCHER, BRENDA
235.00
COLLECT TRASH AT ART FAIR
137758
060706
1090.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET REVOLVING
6/13, 0:45:10
Page - 11
Business Unit
EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION
92.56
CITY OF L_ ..+
R55CKREG LOG20000
3973118
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
Council Check Register
6/15/2006 -- 6/15/2006
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
235.00
285345 611512006
105824 FLYING CLOUD ANIMAL HOSPITAL
142.44
EXAM FOR KODIAK 137955
295851 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
62777100
142.44
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
285346 6/1512006
101475 FOOTJOY
6/13, 0:45:10
Page - 11
Business Unit
EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION
92.56
SHOES
00006178 137583
3973118
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
92.56
285347
6/15/2006
100760 FOWLER ELECTRIC
10.42
REBUILD KIT
00001224 137626
62777100
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
10.42
285348
6/1512006
119845 FRANTZ, LUANNE
300.00
TRANSILITERATOR
137667
CUED SPEECH
1629.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ADAPTIVE RECREATION
300.00
285349
6115/2006
100457 FRASIER, SCOTT
125.00
PERFORMANCE 6/28/06
137807
060106
5610.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
ED ADMINISTRATION
125.00
285350
611512006
100764 G & K SERVICES
61 91
138061
053106
5511.6201
LAUNDRY
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
122.04
138061
053106
5913.6201
LAUNDRY
DISTRIBUTION
164.55
138061
053106
1646.6201
LAUNDRY
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
257.56
138061
053106
1552.6201
LAUNDRY
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
138061
053106
1553.6201
LAUNDRY
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
419.19
138061
053106
1301.6201
LAUNDRY
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
467.17
1,492.42
285351
6115/2006
102456 GALLS INC.
137956
5834356900016
1419.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
RESERVE PROGRAM
35.45
BIKE PANT
35.45
285352
6115/2006
102418 GARDENSIDE LTD
2,166.87
CHAIRS
00002394 137957
0023863 -IN
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
2,166.87
285353
6/15/2006
119121 GENERAL SHEET METAL
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR
178,485.00
GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION
138013
SEVEN
4401.6710
178,485.00
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
6/15/2006 -- 6115/2006
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
285354 6/15/2006 100920 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY - MINNEA
714.90 AUTO PARTS 138062 053106 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS
714.90
285355 6/1512006 114801 GLADSTONE CONSTRUCTION INC.
6113/2006 10:45:10
Page - 12
Business Unit
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
4,354.32 GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION 138014 TWO 4401.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR
4,354.32
285356 6/15 /2006 118941 GLOBALSTAR USA
57.17 R -91 PHONE 137668 00030215 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
57.17
285357 6/15/2006 114697 GOPHER STRIPING CO.
485.00 VAN VALKENBURG PARKING LOT 00001309 137819 060206 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE
485.00
285358 6/1512006 102645 GRAFFITI CONTROL SERVICES
525.00 GRAFFITI REMOVAL 00001692 137820 00001408 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
STREET REVOLVING
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK OCCUPANCY
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
STREET LIGHTING O' tENTAL
525.00
285359 6/15/2006
101103 GRAINGER
24.98
BLOW GUN NOZZLES
00001639
137627
9111421435
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
63.26
SHORTING CAPS
00001633
137628
9110933604
1322.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
85.44
TAPE, PAINT BRUSHES
00001651
137629
9112449682
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
39.30
MASKING TAPE
00001651
137630
9113121041
1301.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
70.79
GAS CAN
00001655
137631
9112449690
4090.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
42.10
PUSH BUTTON SLEEVE
00001596
137821
9112395216
1646.6530
REPAIR PARTS
325.87
285360 6/15/2006
102670 GRAND PERE WINES INC
1,226.00
137871
00016638
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
3,652.50
137872
00016642
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
4,878.50
285361 6/15/2006
101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE
42.13
TRASH BAGS, DRILL & HOOKS
137773
060706
5841.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
61.50
TRASH BAGS, DRILL & HOOKS
137773
060706
5840.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
103.63
285362 6115/2006
100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
INC.
331.21
SEALS
00001503
137632
917802944
322.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
STREET REVOLVING
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK OCCUPANCY
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
STREET LIGHTING O' tENTAL
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF t_
Council Check Register
6/15/2006 -- 6/15/2006
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No
49.25 DRILL 00001649 137774 917939957 1301.6556
121.18 WALL VOLUME CONTROL UNITS 00001649 137774 917939957 5311.6406
501.64
285363 6115/2006
101350 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO.
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
300.94
IRRIGATION SYS REPAIRS 00001677
137775
061365
4091.6103
300.94
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
285364 6/1512006
101863 GREENKEEPER INC.
VERNON SELLING
SPRINGS, TRIMMER LINE
00001283 137824
1,270.40
SPRINKLER REPAIR
137669
00004551
01204.1705.30
1,270.40
32050
1335.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
644.37
285365 611512006
100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
5539
1641.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
808.51
137723
421096
5822.5512
33.92
285367 611512006
137724
421095
5822.5515
108.05-
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
137725
694476
5842.5512
84.15-
137726
694477
5842.5513
90
137873
421029
5842.5512
443.65
137874
421100
5642.5515
4.50
00005913 137584
137875
421032
5842.5512
4,609.99
POOL CHEMICALS
137876
417208
5842.5512
3,356.58
3,262.70
137877
421091
5862.5512
41.15-
WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES
137878
693518
5862.5513
9,024.70
Subledger Account Description
TOOLS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
61131. x45:10
Page - 13
Business Unit
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
POOL OPERATION
GRANDVIEW REVOLVING
BROOKVIEW - 52 TO 54 RECLAIM
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
285366 6/15/2006
100787 GRUBER'S POWER EQUIPMENT
37.55
FUEL LINE, GROMMET
00001274 137822
32062
1642.6530
REPAIR PARTS
937.20
MULCH MOWERS
00001092 137823
5232
1650.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
90.74
SPRINGS, TRIMMER LINE
00001283 137824
32455
1641.6530
REPAIR PARTS
329.52
REBUILD KIT, STARTER KIT
00001186 137825
32050
1335.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
644.37
MOWER, FILTERS, LINE
00001598 137826
5539
1641.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
2,039.38
285367 611512006
114129 HALDEMAN HOMME INC.
4401.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
2,627.70
GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION
138015
118641
2,627.70
285368 6/1512006
100797 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT
WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES
913.40
CHEMICALS
00005913 137584
811733
5915.6586
2,218.62
POOL CHEMICALS
137670
813722
5311.6545
CHEMICALS
3,262.70
CHEMICALS
00005913 137827
812709
5915.6586
WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES
6,394.72
FIELD MAINTENANCE
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
MOWING
PAVEMENT MARKINGS
MOWING
GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR
WATER TREATMENT
POOL OPERATION
WATER TREATMENT
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
6/13/2006 10:45:10
Council Check Register
Page - 14
6115/2006
— 6/15/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
285369
6/15/2006
100799 HEDBERG AGGREGATES
170.84
SAND 00008038
137776
425815
5511.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
170.84
285370
6115/2006
105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION
48.00
TRANSACTION PROCESSING
137828
26057127
1400.6160
DATA PROCESSING
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
51.00
TRANSACTION PROCESSING
137828
26057127
1190.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
ASSESSING
99.00
285371
6/15/2006
101215 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFI
2,179.90
BOOKING FEES - MAY 2006
137958
11030
1195.6170
COURT CHARGES
LEGAL SERVICES
2,179.90
285372
6/15/2006
100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
2,387.93
APRIL 2006
137959
001428
1195.6225
BOARD & ROOM PRISONER
LEGAL SERVICES
2,387.93
285373
6/15/2006
119763 HIGH SHINE CO INC
3,834.00
CONCRETE FLOOR SEALING
137777
621
1551.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
CITY HALL GENERAL
3,834.00
285374
6/15/2006
118948 HINES & SONS INC.
85,500.00
GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION
138016
EIGHT
4401.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR
85,500.00
285375
6/15/2006
104375 HOHENSTEINS INC.
903.95
137879
390485
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
492.50
138045
390488
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
25.95
138046
390489
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
1,422.40
285376
6/15/2006
119094 HUMANA DENTAL
189.38
GROUP 4035028 PREMIUM
137633
060106
1550.6043
COBRA INSURANCE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
7,812.90
GROUP 4035028 PREMIUM
137633
060106
1550.6040
HOSPITALIZATION
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
8,002.28
285377
6115/2006
100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP.
50.33
REPAIR COUPLING PVC 00001600
137829
438094
1643.6530
REPAIR PARTS
GENERAL TURF CARE
30.54
HOSE, CEMENT, PVC 00001605
137830
438060
1643.6530
REPAIR PARTS
GENERAL TURF CARE
80.87
6/131. .0:45:10
Page - 15
Business Unit
FIELD MAINTENANCE
PLANNING
SENIOR CITIZENS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
GENERAL TURF CARE
POOL OPERATION
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
ADAPTIVE RECREATION
285388 6115 20
137727
1085693
5842.5513
CITY OF t_
.,
1,219.11
R55CKREG
LOG20000
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
72.03
137729
1084542
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
Council Check Register
137730
1084544
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
6/15/2006 -- 6/15/2006
137731
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
285378
611512006
102201 INDEPENDENT BLACK DIRT CO INC
426.00
CLAY 00001301 137831
2768
1642.6543
SOD & BLACK DIRT
426.00
285379
6H512006
116191 INSTY- PRINTS
399.91
POSTCARDS 137832
73362
1140.6575
PRINTING
399.91
285380
611512006
119735 IRLBECK, KEITH
336.00
SOFTBALLS 137833
060506
1628.6406.03
SOFTBALL SUPPLIES
336.00
285381
611512006
118322 ITL PATCH COMPANY INC.
220.99
BADGE EMBLEMS 137960
27800
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
220.99
285382
6/1512006
101861 J.H. LARSON COMPANY
810.56
WIRE 00001653 137634
4042748 -01
1322.6530
REPAIR PARTS
810.56
285383
6/15/2006
100386 J.R. JOHNSON SUPPLY INC.
28.56
GREEN HOUSE SUPPLIES 00001608 137961
98732
1643.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
28.56
285384
611512006
102157 JEFF ELLIS & ASSOCIATES INC.
550.00
AQUATIC SAFETY AUDIT 137587
20028094
5311.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
550.00
285385
6/15/2006
102136 JERRY'S TRANSMISSION SERVICE
308.24
LIGHT BAR 00001394 137635
0007121
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
308.24
285386
611512006
102146 JESSEN PRESS
726.33
AR & LE BROCHURES 137671
54144
1629.6575
PRINTING
726.33
/ O6
100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.
6/131. .0:45:10
Page - 15
Business Unit
FIELD MAINTENANCE
PLANNING
SENIOR CITIZENS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
GENERAL TURF CARE
POOL OPERATION
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
ADAPTIVE RECREATION
285388 6115 20
137727
1085693
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,219.11
137728
1085692
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
72.03
137729
1084542
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
312.80
137730
1084544
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
68.04
137731
1084527
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
154.22
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/13/2006 10:45:10
Council Check Register Page - 1 16
6/15/2006 -- 6/1512006
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
499.60
137732
1084522
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
2,997.07
137733
1084523
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
98.03
137734
1084526
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
166.41
137735
1084525
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
156.40
137736
1084524
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
1,252.96
137880
1084543
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
211.06
137881
1084547
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
104.16
137882
1088445
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
553.43
137883
1088444
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
2,769.18
137884
1088449
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1.03
137885
1084530
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
5,140.03
137886
1088446
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
208.06
137887
1088443
5662.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
3,692.94
137888
1088447
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
3,711.97
137889
1084541
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
2,907.35
138047
1088436
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
113.76
138048
1088434
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
26,409.64
285389 6115/2006
103230 JOHNSTONS SALES & SERVICE
120.90
CARPET CLEANER REPAIR 00003604 137672
C734224
1470.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
120.90
285390 6/15/2006
118336 JONES AND BARTLETT PUBLISHERS
500.56
LIFEGUARD MANUALS
137834
1313688
5310.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POOL ADMINISTRATION
500.56
285391 6115/2006
101846 JUST FRIENDS BIG BAND
100.00
PERFORMANCE 6/25/06
137804
060106
5610.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
ED ADMINISTRATION
100.00
285392 6/15/2006
106186 KAEDING & ASSOCIATES INC.
945.00
ENGINEERING SERVICES
137778
050615D
05457.1705.20
CONSULTING DESIGN
WM-457 WELL #17
945.00
285393 6/15/2006
119848 KARLON, TATE
100.00
COLLECT TRASH AT ART FAIR
137759
060706
4090.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET REVOLVING
100.00
285394 6/15/2006
100553 KEEHR, GREGORY
124.60
MMBA CONFERENCE EXPENSES
138055
060806
5860.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
369.00
MMBA CONFERENCE EXPENSES
138055
060806
'860.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
VERNON LIQUOR GF 1.
6/13/ ` J'45'10
CITY OF E-.n
R55CKREG
LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 17
6/15/2006
— 6/15/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
493.60
285395
6/1512006
111018 KEEPRS INC.
259.90
UNIFORMS
00003532 137673
53463
1470.6558
DEPT UNIFORMS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
262.64
UNIFORMS
00003542 137674
51053 -03
1470.6558
DEPT UNIFORMS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
522.54
285396
6/1512006
105606 KELLINGTON CONSTRUCTION INC.
750.50
GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION
138017
ONE
4401.6710
EOUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR
750.50
285397
6115/2006
114558 KESTREL DESIGN GROUP
INC., THE
65.00
LANDSCAPE INSPECTION
137675
2640
5923.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
COLLECTION SYSTEMS
65.00
285398
6/15/2006
100002 KLM ENGINEERING INC.
16,175.00
TOWER INSPECTION
137676
2930
05435.1705.21
CONSULTING INSPECTION
VANVALK WATER TOWER REHAB
16,175.00
285399
6/15/2006
119838 KUBICEK, KRIS
77.76
SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT
137588
060506
1140.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PLANNING
77.76
285400
6/15/2006
116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS
4601.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
POLICE FORFEITURE
400.81
DWI TOWING
137779
060706
400.81
285401
6115/2006
116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS
1552.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
232.00
TOWING SERVICES
00001679 137780
52002
232.00
285402
6/15/2006
100354 LAGUNA CLAY CO.
5120.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
837.61
CLAY
00009160 137781
99076
837.61
285403
6/1512006
100605 LANDS' END BUSINESS
OUTFITTERS
1,003.49
LOGO CLOTHING
00004102 137835
04797082
1513.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS
1,003.49
285404
6115/2006
119844 LEAF, CINDY
1600.4390.04
NATURE CAMP
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
57.00
PROGRAM REFUND
137677
060606
57.00
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
6/15/2006 -- 6/15/2006
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
285405 6/15/2006 100853 LEEF SERVICES
33.21 SHOP TOWELS 137589 1142204 5422.6201 LAUNDRY
CHEMICALS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
6/13/2006 10:45:10
Page - 18
Business Unit
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR
COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS
MEETING EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS
MATERIALS /SUPPLIES
FERTILIZER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
TOOLS
SOD & BLACK DIRT
SOD & BLACK DIRT
Chemical Rm. Expansion -plant 4
EDINBOROUGH PARK
GENERAL STORM SEWER
CENTENNIAL LAKES
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
GENERAL TURF CARE
DISTRIBUTION
RUBBISH REMOVAL PSTF OCCUPANCY
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
33.21
285406
6/15/2006
100855 LESCO INC.
320.00
HERBICIDE 00006432
137590
14118183
5422.6545
320.00
285407
6/15/2006
117407 LEXISNEXIS
110.00
BACKGROUND CHECKS
137962
0605266789
1400.6103
110.00
285408
611512006
102616 LUND MARTIN CONSTRUCTION INC.
10,640.00
GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION
138018
ONE
4401.6710
10,640.00
285409
6/15/2006
112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP
1,066.50
CANDY
138035
201696
5320.5510
1,066.50
285410
6/15/2006
105677 MAGC
40.00
BANQUET REGISTRATION
137836
NL606ED
2210.6106
40.00
285411
6/15/2006
100865 MAGNUSON SOD
93.94
137963
053106
05453.1705.31
98.91
137963
053106
5620.6540
149.10
137963
053106
5932.6406
411.68
137963
053106
5630.6406
538.35
137963
053106
1301.6556
709.72
137963
053106
1643.6543
2,649.99
137963
053106
5913.6543
4,651.69
285412
6115/2006
114699 MANAGED SERVICES INC.
452.63
JANITORIAL SERVICE - JUNE
137782
608489
7411.6182
452.63
285413
6/15/2006
100868 MARK VII SALES
4,369.85
137737
939795
5842.5514
139.65
137738
939796
942.5514
CHEMICALS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
6/13/2006 10:45:10
Page - 18
Business Unit
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR
COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS
MEETING EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS
MATERIALS /SUPPLIES
FERTILIZER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
TOOLS
SOD & BLACK DIRT
SOD & BLACK DIRT
Chemical Rm. Expansion -plant 4
EDINBOROUGH PARK
GENERAL STORM SEWER
CENTENNIAL LAKES
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
GENERAL TURF CARE
DISTRIBUTION
RUBBISH REMOVAL PSTF OCCUPANCY
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
CITY OF . ,
6/131. 0:45:10
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check
Register
Page - 19
6/15/2006
-- 6/15/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
3,662.48
138049
957117
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
291.00
138050
957118
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
8,462.98
285414
6/1512006
102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC
232.50
PHONE REPAIRS 138036
31302
1470.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
232.50
285415
6/15/2006
101308 MCCARTHY, LOWELL
90.00
ART HISTORY PRESENTATION 137837
060506
1628.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SENIOR CITIZENS
90.00
285416
6/15/2006
101483 MENARDS
26.45
GLOVES, PLUG 00006430 137591
27707
5422.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
244.18
DRAIN TILE 00006498 137592
27378
5422.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
270.63
285417
6/1512006
100882 MERIT SUPPLY
699.01
CAR WASH & WAX 00006487 137593
69537
5423.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GOLF CARS
699.01
285418
6/15/2006
101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY
31.62
PLAYGROUND BALLS 137838
91939
4077.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
355.61
TENNIS BALLS 137838
91939
1623.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
TENNIS INSTRUCTION
387.23
285419
6115/2006
103192 METRO LEGAL SERVICES
37.00
TITLE/TAX SEARCH 137678
1078252
2127.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
COMM DEV BLK GRANT
37.00
285420
6/15/2006
100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME
286,849.15
SEWER SERVICE 137783
825688
5922.6302
SEWER SERVICE METRO
SEWER TREATMENT
286,849.15
285421
611512006
104650 MICRO CENTER
5125.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MEDIA STUDIO
23.98
00009166 137784
1145494
Y8.70
00009166 137784
1145494
5125.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MEDIA STUDIO
89,99
00009166 137784
1145494
5125.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
MEDIA STUDIO
42.59
00009170 137785
1145647
5125.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MEDIA STUDIO
185.26
285422
611512006
100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP.
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
6/15/2006 - 6/15/2006
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
903.09 ASPHALT 00005909 137594 79796MB 1301.6518 BLACKTOP
GASOLINE
GASOLINE
GASOLINE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
WATER PURCHASED
GENERAL SUPPLIES
6/13/2006 10:45:10
Page- 20
Business Unit
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE
GOLF CARS
DISTRIBUTION
EOUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ED ADMINISTRATION
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
ADVERTISING OTHER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL
COMMUNICATIONS
STREET NAME SIGNS
903.09
285423
6/1512006
103186 MIDWEST FUELS
897.30
GASOLINE
00006070
137595
36192
5422.6581
521.02
DIESEL FUEL
00006071
137596
36194
5422.6581
516.59
DIESEL FUEL
00006071
137597
36118
5431.6581
594.26
GASOLINE
00006070
137598
36116
5423.6406
2,529.17
285424
6/15/2006
103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT
17,506.60
WATER PURCHASE
137786
060206
5913.6601
17,506.60
285425
6/15/2006
102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY
5.94
CYLINDER CHARGE
00001236
137787
R105061362
1553.6406
5.94
285426
6/15/2006
101746 MINNESOTA
COUNTY ATTORNEYS ASS
153.89
CODE BOOKS
137964
16604
1400.6104
153.89
285427
6/15/2006
101638 MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
35.00
HOSPITALITY FEE #50026 00002015
137965
116821
5610.6105
35.00
285428
6115/2006
106193 MINNESOTA
HIGHWAY SAFETY AND
942.00
LAW ENFORCEMENT
COURSE
137966
060906
1400.6104
942.00
285429
6/15/2006
103260 MINNESOTA
NURSERY & LANDSCAPE
89.00
MEMBERSHIP DUES
00001612
137839
060106
1640.6105
89.00
285430
6/15/2006
118144 MINNESOTA
PREMIER PUBLICATIONS
2,400.00
MN PARENT AD
137599
13641
2210.6122
2,400.00
285431
6/15/2006
105430 MINNESOTA
SUPPLY COMPANY
103.61
SHIPPING CHARGE
00005977
137967
M55681
1325.6406
103.61
GASOLINE
GASOLINE
GASOLINE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
WATER PURCHASED
GENERAL SUPPLIES
6/13/2006 10:45:10
Page- 20
Business Unit
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE
GOLF CARS
DISTRIBUTION
EOUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ED ADMINISTRATION
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
ADVERTISING OTHER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL
COMMUNICATIONS
STREET NAME SIGNS
CITY OF E".
6113/,,. .:45:10
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 21
6/15/2006
- 6/15/2006
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
285432 611512006
112769 MINUTI -OGLE CO. INC.
30,190.05
GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION
138020
ONE
4401.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW 8 COMM CTR
30,190.05
285433 611512006
119547 MOON, JENNI
48.93
SWIM DIAPERS
138037
061206
5310.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
POOL ADMINISTRATION
48.93
285434 6115/2006
102395 MOSE, WILLIAM
488.25
OFFICIATING FEES
138025
060906
4077.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
488.25
285435 6/1512006
117246 MT GLOBAL
92.95
137890
1701
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
92.95
285436 6/1512006
100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC.
92.92
FUEL FILTERS
00006496 137600
524251 -01
5422.6530
REPAIR PARTS
MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS
68.53
ELEMENTS
00006496 137601
524251 -00
5422.6530
REPAIR PARTS
MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS
83.83
COUPLERS, BUSHINGS
00006492 137602
523284 -00
5422.6611
IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT
MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS
1,087.71
BODY ASSEMBLIES, PARTS
00006499 137603
524652 -00
5422.6611
IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT
MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS
27.16
STAPLES, CLAMPS
00002000 137968
526426 -00
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
191.97
VALVES, HEADS
00002000 137969
526262 -00
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
17.02
IRRIGATION PARTS
00002000 137970
526111 -00
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
158.53
HEADS
00002000 137971
525893 -00
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
8.57
COUPLINGS, WRENCH
00002399 137972
525299 -00
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
16.37-
CREDIT
137973
510309 -00
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
1,719.87
285437 611512006
118620 MULTISCAPES INCORPORATED
250.00
PAVER DRIVE - 5040 MALIBU DR
OOREPAIR 137788
1366
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
DISTRIBUTION
250.00
285438 6/15/2006
102358 NATIONAL PEN CORPORATION
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
166.77
PENS
137604
103530219
1550.6406
166.77
285439 6115/2006
100012 NATIONAL WATERWORKS INC.
448.54
WATERMAIN REPAIR CLAMPS
00001630 137789
3539880
5913.6530
REPAIR PARTS
DISTRIBUTION
336.16
WATERMAIN REPAIR CLAMPS
00001630 137790
3540307
5913.6530
REPAIR PARTS
DISTRIBUTION
784.70
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
6/13/2006 10:45:10
Council Check Register
Page - 22
6115/2006
-- 6/15/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
285440
6/15/2006
104672 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
627.95
137679
757391129 -042
1470.6151
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
38.50
138059
873184124 -042
1553.6188
TELEPHONE
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
38.50
138059
873184124 -042
4090.6188
TELEPHONE
STREET REVOLVING
173.25
138059
873184124 -042
1640.6188
TELEPHONE
PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL
250.25
138059
873184124 -042
1260.6188
TELEPHONE
ENGINEERING GENERAL
269.50
138059
873184124 -042
1322.6188
TELEPHONE
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
365.76
138059
873184124 -042
1301.6188
TELEPHONE
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
835.25
138059
873184124 -042
5910.6188
TELEPHONE
GENERAL (BILLING)
2,598.96
285441
6/1512006
119853 NORTH CENTRAL TRUCK EQUIPMENT
849.10
MIRROR, RESTOCKING CHARGE 00001678 137791
111925X1
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
636.84-
MIRROR, RESTOCKING CHARGE 00001678 137792
CM111925XA
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
212.26
285442
6/15/2006
103072 NORTHERN AIR CORPORATION
1,662.50
GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION 138019
THREE
4401.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR
1,662.50
285443
6/15/2006
117830 NORTHLAND BUSINESS SYSTEMS
255.00
TRANSCRIBER 137974
69342
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
255.00
285444
6/15/2006
102652 NORTHLAND CHEMICAL CORP.
227.14
MOLECULES 00001593 137840
101447
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
227.14
285445
6115/2006
117089 NORTHLAND IRRIGATION & LANDSCA
430.00
SPRINKLER REPAIR 137680
052506
01326.1705.30
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
SUNNYSLOPE ST RECLAIM
430.00
285446
6/15/2006
100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY
29.27
LTX TUBES, T SQUARE 00009176 137793
32963300
5120.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
29.27
285447
6/15/2006
118639 NORTHWEST LASERS INC.
51.12
QUICK CLAMP ASSEMBLIES 00004108 137681
S100030118
1260.6577
LUMBER
ENGINEERING GENERAL
51.12
285448
6/15/2006
100936 OLSEN COMPANIES
569.84
SADDLE BOX 00001211 137841
393463
132.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL STORM SE`
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF ED1NA
Council Check Register
6/15/2006 - 6/15/2006
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
1400.6203
1400.6203
1642.6103
1400.6175
1553.6530
5822.5513
5862.5513
5862.5513
5842.5513
5842.5513
5630.5510
5320.5510
5320.5510
5100.1720
5842.5513
5842.5513
5842.5512
5842.5515
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS
REPAIR PARTS
6/13/k,-- 10:45:10
Page - 23
Business Unit
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
FIELD MAINTENANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
569.84
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
285449
6/15/2006
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
118891 OLSON, LYNN
143.94
UNIFORM PURCHASE
137975
060906
143.94
285450
6/15/2006
102265 OLSON, TIM
110.83
UNIFORM PURCHASE
137976
060906
110.83
285451
6/15/2006
100941 PARK NICOLLET CLINIC
24.00
HEARING TEST
138038
060206
236.69
FITNESS FOR DUTY
138038
060206
260.69
285452
6/15/2006
101718 PARTS PLUS
5,761.72
AUTO PARTS
137794
053106
5,761.72
285453
6/15/2006
100347 PAUSTIS & SONS
791.00
137739
8110928 -IN
147.33
137891
8108127 -IN
1,600.59
137892
8110920 -IN
1,322.00
137893
8110929 -IN
1,908.00
137894
8110446 -IN
5,768.92
285454
6/15/2006
100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY
642.90
137977
21022274
151.00
138039
21022350
199.50
138040
21022309
993.40
285455
6115/2006
100948 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS
1,800.00
INSTALL DRAIN TILE -ART CENTER 00001592
137842
060206
1,800.00
285456
6115/2006
100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
36.98
137740
2334647
388,12
137741
2334646
1.03
137742
2334649
38.23
137743
2334648
1400.6203
1400.6203
1642.6103
1400.6175
1553.6530
5822.5513
5862.5513
5862.5513
5842.5513
5842.5513
5630.5510
5320.5510
5320.5510
5100.1720
5842.5513
5842.5513
5842.5512
5842.5515
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS
REPAIR PARTS
6/13/k,-- 10:45:10
Page - 23
Business Unit
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
FIELD MAINTENANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD
COST OF GOODS SOLD
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BUILDINGS
CENTENNIAL LAKES
POOL CONCESSIONS
POOL CONCESSIONS
ART CENTER BALANCE SHEET
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
6/13/2006 10:45:10
Council Check Register
Page - 24
6/15/2006
- 6/15/2006
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
80.53
137744
2333883
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
733.56
137745
2333882
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
1,377.55
137746
2333881
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
640.09
137895
2333891
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
1,743.33
137896
2336759
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
995.85
137897
2336758
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
2,325.71
138051
2336755
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
928.13
138052
2336757
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
9,289.11
285457 6/1512006
116619 PIPELINE SUPPLY INC.
146.58
TOILET
00001308 137843
S2236575.001
1646.6530
REPAIR PARTS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
146.58
285458 6/15/2006
100160 PLANET SOCCER
3,225.00
SOCCER GOALS & NETS
00007097 137682
JY09
1621.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES
3,225.00
285459 6/1512006
101110 POLLY NORMAN PHOTOGRAPHY
50.00
ABOUT TOWN PHOTOS
137605
053106
2210.6123
MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE
COMMUNICATIONS
50.00
285460 6/1512006
100961 POSTMASTER
375.00
NEWSLETTER POSTAGE
137978
060906
1628.6235
POSTAGE
SENIOR CITIZENS
375.00
285461 6/15/2006
100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY
319.96
137747
421094
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
145.30
137898
421090
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
1,550.85
137899
421089
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLO WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,051.90
137900
418544
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
228.90
137901
410591
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
46.65
137902
421099
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
2,351.19
137903
421098
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
5,694.75
285462 6/15/2006
102354 PRO GUARD SPORTS INC.
90.08
TAPE
00008045 137844
260589
5510.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
ARENA ADMINISTRATION
90.08
285463 6115/2006
100969 PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING ENGINEE
971.10
WELL INSPECTION
137683
05023.09
5450.1705.21
CONSULTING INSPECTION
WM-450
CITY OF EDINA 6113/2%. J:45:10
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register Page- 25
6/15/2006 -- 6/15/2006
Check # Date
Amount
2,800.00
2,800.00
2,894.25
Supplier / Explanation
RECYCLE BASIN
RECYCLE BASIN
RECYCLE BASIN
PO # Doc No
137684
137684
137684
Inv No
03034.31
03034.31
03034.31
Account No
05425.1705.20
05426.1705.20
05427.1705.20
Subledger Account Description
CONSULTING DESIGN
CONSULTING DESIGN
CONSULTING DESIGN
Business Unit
PLANT #2 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYST
PLANT #4 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYST
PLANT #3 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYST
9,465.35
285464 6/15/2006
117721 PROSOURCE EDUCATIONAL SERVICES
300.00
ACCESS CONSULTING
137979
6051424
1400.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
300.00
285465 611512006
153.15
100971 QUALITY WINE
137748
715912 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
1,391.80
137749
715023 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
1,259.86
137750
716112 -00
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
10.00-
137751
711130 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
858.66
137904
715828 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,21
137905
716006 -00
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
3.05
137906
713882 -00
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
94.58-
137907
713880 -00
5840.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
4,757.98
1,849.00
620.50
137907
137908
137909
713880 -00
715997 -00
716005 -00
5842.5512
5842.5512
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
2,715.14
1,080.65
1,252.62
1,714.19
365.75
1,009.45
1,391.80
1,462.61
1,634.61
137910
137911
137912
137913
137914
137915
137916
137917
137918
716111 -00
715282 -00
715022 -00
716157 -00
716192 -00
715432 -00
714838 -00
715829.00
716155 -00
5842.5512
5842.5513
5842.5513
5862.5513
5822.5513
5822.5513
5862.5513
5862.5513
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
23,417.45
285466 611512006
55.07
57.69
86.12
98.37
100.93
163.47
167.47
192.45
231.76
101965 QWEST
137864
137864
137864
137864
137864
137864
137864
137864
137864
052806
052806
052806
052806
052806
052806
052806
052806
052806
5911.6188
1628.6188
5861.6188
5821.6188
5841.6188
1622.6188
5610.6188
1470.6188
1646.6188
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
PUMP 8 LIFT STATION OPER
SENIOR CITIZENS
VERNON OCCUPANCY
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
YORK OCCUPANCY
SKATING & HOCKEY
ED ADMINISTRATION
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
R55CKREG LOG20000
6,755.13
CITY OF
EDINA
285467
6/15/2006
Council Check Register
6/15/2006
- 6115/2006
138026
Check # Date Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
253.86
285468
137864
052806
5511.6188
TELEPHONE
263.73
137864
052806
5932.6188
TELEPHONE
2,428.22
137864
052806
1550.6188
TELEPHONE
876.00
612 E01-0426
137980
0426 -6/06
1550.6188
TELEPHONE
283.46
612 E24 -8656
137981
8656 -6/06
1628.6188
TELEPHONE
505.50
612 E24 -8657
137982
8657 -0 /06
5420.6188
TELEPHONE
566.92
612 E24 -8659
137983
8659 -6/06
1470.6188
TELEPHONE
283.46
612 E24 -8661
137984
8661 -6106
5111.6188
TELEPHONE
89.26
952 926 -0419
137985
0419 -6/06
1646.6188
TELEPHONE
51.39
952 926 -0092
137986
0092 -6106
5913.6188
TELEPHONE
4077.6103
5913.6406
4077.6103
5630.6180
5913.6406
1470.6406
5610.6136
401.6710
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
6/13/2006 10:45:10
Page - 26
Business Unit
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
GENERAL STORM SEWER
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
SENIOR CITIZENS
CLUB HOUSE
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
DISTRIBUTION
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
DISTRIBUTION
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
CENTENNIAL LAKES
DISTRIBUTION
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION
EOUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIE' ')MM CTR
6,755.13
285467
6/15/2006
102631 REAMER, MARK
953.25
OFFICIATING FEES
138026
060906
953.25
285468
6/15/2006
119854 RHINO
300.87
WARNING MARKERS 00001546
137845
23685
300.87
285469
6/15/2006
119755 RICCI, PATRICE
209.25
OFFICIATING FEES
138027
060906
209.25
285470
6/15/2006
100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY
1,586.30
PLUMBING REPAIRS 00002004
137987
42949
1,586.30
285471
6/15/2006
102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED
51.62
BED MAT 00001209
137846
1161649 -01
51.62
285472
6/15/2006
100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO.
63.74
SOFTENER SALT 00003648
137847
00178115
63.74
285473
6115/2006
116393 ROGERS, RUSS
150.00
PERFORMANCE 6/27/06
137806
060106
150.00
285474
6/15/2006
118001 ROZEBOOM MILLER ARCHITECTS INC
6,247.80
ARCHITECT /ENGINEERING FEES
137685
14
4077.6103
5913.6406
4077.6103
5630.6180
5913.6406
1470.6406
5610.6136
401.6710
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
6/13/2006 10:45:10
Page - 26
Business Unit
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
GENERAL STORM SEWER
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
SENIOR CITIZENS
CLUB HOUSE
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
DISTRIBUTION
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
DISTRIBUTION
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
CENTENNIAL LAKES
DISTRIBUTION
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION
EOUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIE' ')MM CTR
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EU.,.., 6/130,,._ .0:45:10
Council Check Register Page - 27
6/15/2006
- 6/15/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
6,247.80
285475
6/1512006
105324 RT ELECTRIC
1,475.00
INSTALL FOUNTAINS
00002014 137988
05 -996
5630.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
CENTENNIAL LAKES
1,475.00
285476
6115/2006
101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT
27.52
101 - 26373069350 FOOD & CANDY
137848
37396318005
1623.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
TENNIS INSTRUCTION
74.17
101- 26373069350 FOOD & CANDY
137848
37396318005
4075.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
VANVALKENBURG
101.69
285477
6/1512006
119859 SANDELIN, CARRIE
79.56
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
138060
060906
1624.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
PLAYGROUND & THEATER
79.56
285478
6/15/2006
101431 SCAN AIR FILTER
373.45
FILTERS
00001665 137849
97216
1551.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CITY HALL GENERAL
373.45
285479
6115/2006
100990 SCHARBER & SONS
39.67-
CREDIT
137850
356398
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
370.09
CLUTCH
00001438 137851
356909
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
42.87
OIL LINE
00005816 137852
356780
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
223.53
WATER PUMP, GASKETS
00001441 137853
357288
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
596.82
285480
6/15/2006
105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO.
212.37
LUMBER, WOOD FILLER
00001640 137636
40311434
05453.1705.31
MATERIALS /SUPPLIES
Chemical Rm. Expansion -plant 4
212.37
285481
6/1512006
119799 SCHIMETZ, SCOTT
279.00
OFFICIATING FEES
138028
060906
4077.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
279.00
285482
6115/2006
101577 SCHMOLL, RUTH
241.04
PETTY CASH
137854
060606
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
241.04
285483
6/15/2006
100995 SEH
81.92
ANTENNA REVIEW
137686
0145709
5914.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
TANKS TOWERS &RESERVOIR
622.19
BID DOCUMENT PREP
137687
0145903
05459.1705.21
CONSULTING INSPECTION
WM-459 59TH ST RAW WATER LINE
2,000.00
PIPE REHAB
137688
0145902
04316.1705.21
CONSULTING INSPECTION
STS -316 SUNNYSLOPE AREA CIPP
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
6/1312006 10:45:10
Council Check Register
Page - 28
6/15/2006
-- 6/15/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
2,500.00
PIPE REHAB
137688
0145902
03420.1705.21
CONSULTING INSPECTION
SS SHANNON DEWWEY TO KEMRICH
3,288.83
PIPE REHAB
137688
0145902
03413.1705.21
CONSULTING INSPECTION
PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO SS
5,348.04
STREET & BLVD
137689
0145901
05451.1705.21
CONSULTING INSPECTION
WM-451 Nine Mile Village
3,824.82
WATER MAIN REHAB
137690
0145900
05451.1705.21
CONSULTING INSPECTION
WM-451 Nine Mile Village
17,665.80
285484
6/15/2006
101862 SEVEN CORNERS ACE HARDWARE
INC
46.80
DARBY, EDGER 00001250
137606
92250
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
46.80
285485
6/1512006
102995 SHAPCO PRINTING INC.
660.30
APRIL NEWSLETTER
137607
142331 -01
2210.6575
PRINTING
COMMUNICATIONS
660.30
285486
6/15/2006
100999 SIGNAL SYSTEMS INC.
42.50
TIMECLOCK REPAIR
137608
72938
5422.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
42.50
285487
6/1512006
101000 SIR SPEEDY
95.85
BUSINESS CARDS
137855
50877
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
95.85
285488
6/15/2006
105903 SKATRUD, TODD
159.90
UNIFORM PURCHASE
137989
060906
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
159.90
285489
6/15/2006
119846 SNYDER, NICHOLAS
300.00
COLLECT TRASH AT ART FAIR
137760
060706
4090.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET REVOLVING
300.00
285490
6/15/2006
103273 SOUTHSIDE BIG BAND
150.00
PERFORMANCE 6/26106
137805
060106
5610.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
ED ADMINISTRATION
150.00
285491
6/15/2006
119861 SPANISH ON PATROL.COM
66.00
SPANISH FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT
137990
2344
1400.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
66.00
285492
6/15/2006
116682 SPECIALTY WINES & BEVERAGES
209.00
137919
8892
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
204.00
137920
8898
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
413.00
6/13/.. 10:45:10
Page - 29
Business Unit
PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER
COLLECTION SYSTEMS
SIDEWALK INTERLACHEN /BLAKE
BA- 313 70TH & METRO
CONTINGENCIES
PATHS & HARD SURFACE
1,158.48
WANT ADS
137609
CITY OF L_ _.A
1550.6121
R55CKREG LOG20000
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
1,158.48
Council Check Register
6/1512006
119671 STERLING SUPPLY INC.
6/15/2006
— 6/15/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
285493
611512006
57.80
101004 SPS COMPANIES
285498
237.32
COPPER TUBING, ADAPTERS
00001647 137795
S1456170.001
5911.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
2.03
COUPLING
00001658 137856
S1456574.001
5923.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1400.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
239.35
784.50
SQUAD TEARDOWN
137993
285494
611512006
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
101016 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC
489.79
SQUAD REPAIRS
137994
8,726.00
PRELIM DESIGN
137691
5211 -16
07091.1705.20
CONSULTING DESIGN
2,519.99
16,646.06
PRELIM DESIGN
137692
5656 -2
01313.1705.20
CONSULTING DESIGN
6/15/2006
8,690.07
NE EDINA TRANS STUDY
137693
5523 -7
1500.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
19.93
34,062.13
137995
1174767
1400.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
285495
6/1512006
19.93
103283 ST. CROIX RECREATION CO INC
19.20
END CAP
00001693 137991
14867
1647.6530
REPAIR PARTS
19.20
150.00
PERFORMANCE 6/29/06
137808
285496
6/15/2006
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
101007 STAR TRIBUNE
150.00
6/13/.. 10:45:10
Page - 29
Business Unit
PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER
COLLECTION SYSTEMS
SIDEWALK INTERLACHEN /BLAKE
BA- 313 70TH & METRO
CONTINGENCIES
PATHS & HARD SURFACE
1,158.48
WANT ADS
137609
053106
1550.6121
ADVERTISING PERSONNEL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
1,158.48
285497
6/1512006
119671 STERLING SUPPLY INC.
57.80
SAND, CONTAINERS
00001627 137637
52996
1375.6530
REPAIR PARTS
PARKING RAMP
57.80
285498
6/1512006
101015 STREICHERS
1,245.70
SQUAD BUILDUP
137992
1356366
1400.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
784.50
SQUAD TEARDOWN
137993
1356361
1400.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
489.79
SQUAD REPAIRS
137994
1354137
1400.6215
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
2,519.99
285499
6/15/2006
117992 STRINGER BUSINESS SYSTEMS
19.93
COPIER USAGE
137995
1174767
1400.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
19.93
285500
6115/2006
102639 STROHMYER, TOM
150.00
PERFORMANCE 6/29/06
137808
060106
5610.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
ED ADMINISTRATION
150.00
285501
6/15/2006
101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
31.67
HARNESS
00001516 137638
441794CVW
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
2.02
CAP
00005818 137639
440685CVW
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
104.61
CONTROL
00001438 137857
390148 -1CVW
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
6/13/2006 10:45:10
Council Check Register
Page - 30
6/15/2006
- 6/15/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
71.69
MIRRORS
00001445 137996
442874 -1CVW
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
84.19
MIRROR
00001782 137997
442547 -1CVW
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
85.49
HOIST ASSEMBLY, CAP
00001788 138056
437332CVW
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
379.67
285502
6/15/2006
101019 SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY
2,000.00
MEMBERSHIP
137998
060106
1506.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY
2,000.00
285503
6115/2006
100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS
495.00
NE OPEN HOUSE AD
00016102 137694
614316
1265.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
140.00
ADVERTISING
137796
614422
5822.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
50TH ST SELLING
140.00
ADVERTISING
137796
614422
5842.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
YORK SELLING
140.00
ADVERTISING
137796
614422
5862.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
VERNON SELLING
915.00
285504
6/1512006
119864 SYSCO MINNESOTA
26.35
GLASS CLEANER
138041
606011793
5320.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
POOL CONCESSIONS
1,139.04
CONCESSION PRODUCT
138041
606011793
5320.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
POOL CONCESSIONS
33.98
FLOOR CLEANER
138042
606069011
5311.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
POOL OPERATION
1,199.37
285505
611512006
117686 TECHNA GRAPHICS
153.53
OFF LEASH FORMS
137999
601220 -01
1450.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ANIMAL CONTROL
153.53
285506
6/15/2006
105123 THEMESCAPES, INC.
105.00
MULCH
137858
206113 -1R
5311.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POOL OPERATION
105.00
285507
6/15/2006
101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
359.00
137610
412470
5421.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
GRILL
128.70
138053
413141
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
3,323.37
138054
413109
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
3,811.07
285508
6115/2006
102742 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS
PLAN
970.30
LIFT STATION INSPECTION
137695
000200601904
10026.1705.21
CONSULTING INSPECTION
LS -26 LIFT STATION 14
1,724.43
FEASIBILITY STUDY
137696
000200601919
04322.1705.20
CONSULTING DESIGN
STS -322 STORMWATER DREDGING
2,694.73
285509
6115120r
101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING
SUPPLY
CITY OF t.-...A
6/11- 10:45:10
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 31
6/15/2006
-- 6/15/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
- Business Unit
27.28
WELDING GAS
00001668 137640
402987
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
61.38
CYLINDER/DEMURRAGE
00001551 137797
402989
5913.6580
WELDING SUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
27.28
WELDING EQUIPMENT
138000
402988
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
115.94
285510
6115/2006
101411 TOP NOTCH TREECARE
319.50
OAK TREE SPRAY
137611
X026878 -01
5431.6541
PLANTINGS 8 TREES
RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE
319.50
285511
6/15/2006
118704 TOWNSHEND, SCHUYLER
40.05
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
138022
061206
2210.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
COMMUNICATIONS
40.05
285512
6/15/2006
118190 TURFWERKS LLC
20.67
THROTTLE CABLE
00001676 137798
S106379
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
20.67
285513
6/1512006
102469 TWIN CITY CONCRETE PRODUCTS CO
261.21
MORTAR
00001624 137859
289351
5932.6520
CONCRETE
GENERAL STORM SEWER
261.21
285514
6/15/2006
102255 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO
56.70
OXYGEN
00003649 137697
857776
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
23.77
OXYGEN
00003649 137698
857780
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
47.54
OXYGEN
137699
814414
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
128.01
285515
6/15/2006
102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO.
304.59
EROSION BLANKET
00006444 137612
14365
5424.6543
SOD & BLACK DIRT
RANGE
304.59
285516
6/15/2006
101051 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
91.50
138001
053106
1419.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
RESERVE PROGRAM
1,344.48
138001
053106
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
1,435.98
285517
6/15/2006
101053 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY
28.70
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
00001650 137799
517091
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
28.70
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
00001650 137799
517091
1551.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CITY HALL GENERAL
28.70
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
00001650 137799
517091
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
28.70
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
00001650 137799
517091
5912.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDINGS
196.91
CABLE
00001650 137860
517118
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
6/15/2006 - 6/15/2006
6/13/2006 10:45:10
Page - 32
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
311.71
285518
6/15/2006
101058 VAN PAPER CO.
281.96
TOWELS, TISSUE
00001604 137861
637975
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
71.89
TISSUE
00001604 138002
638362
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
9.59
BOX CUTTERS
00007513 138003
638361
5860.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
VERNON LIOUOR GENERAL
363.44
285519
6/1512006
101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC.
175.17
WATERING GUN
00006489 137613
23809
5423.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GOLF CARS
175.17
285520
6/15/2006
101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY
175.55
WIRE
00001505 137641
9916971
1322.6530
REPAIR PARTS
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
175.55
285521
6/15/2006
100023 VOGEL, ROBERT C.
1,500.00
HISTORIC REVIEW
137700
26022
07091.1705.20
CONSULTING DESIGN
SIDEWALK INTERLACHEN/BLAKE
1,500.00
285522
6/15/2006
101069 VOSS LIGHTING
190.74
LIGHTING
00001493 137642
15046266 -01
1321.6530
REPAIR PARTS
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
21.98
LIGHTING
00001493 137643
15046266 -00
1321.6530
REPAIR PARTS
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
8.63
LIGHTING
00001234 137644
15044191 -00
1551.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CITY HALL GENERAL
221.35
285523
6/15/2006
116558 WALKER, NATALIE
90.00
COLLECT TRASH AT ART FAIR
137761
060706
4090.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET REVOLVING
90.00
285524
6/15/2006
103466 WASTE MANAGEMENT - SAVAGE MN
3,601.21
REFUSE
137614
3592421
4095.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
50TH STREET RUBBISH
3,107.11
REFUSE
137800
3603747
4095.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
50TH STREET RUBBISH
6,708.32
285525
6/15/2006
101944 WATERSTREET, JOAN M
59.44
UNIFORM PURCHASE
138004
060506
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
59.44
285526
6/1512006
101033 WINE COMPANY, THE
1,001.90
137752
140659 -00
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
203.20
137753
142940 -00
'22.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date
285527 611512006
285528 6/15/2006
285529 611512006
285530 6/15/2006
285531 6/15/2006
285532 6/1512006
285533 6115/2006
CITY OF El.... 6113/', J:45:10
C it Ch ck Re later Page - 33
ounc e g
6/15/2006 - 6/15/2006
b d A i D ri lion Business Unit
Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Su le ger ccoun esc p
614.90 137921 143022 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
53840 137922 142939 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
2,358.40
5862.5513
5862.5513
1644.6107
5842.5513
5862.5513
1301.6610
1321.6185
1646.6185
5821.6185
5861.6185
5841.6185
1330.6185
5913.6185
5914.6185
5511.6185
5913.6185
5110.6151
1400.6230
1400.6230
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
VERNON OCCUPANCY
YORK OCCUPANCY
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
DISTRIBUTION
TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
DISTRIBUTION
EQUIPMENT RENTAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
101312 WINE MERCHANTS
260.34
137923
159622
85.03-
137924
28982
175.31
118368 WOLFF, SARA
280.80
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
137862
060606
280.80
101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC
650.00
137754
179737
294.00
137925
179809
944.00
118371 WORLD GOLF COLLECTION
72.00
LIP BALM 00005935
138005
INV01627
72.00
101726 XCEL ENERGY
21.73
51- 7567037 -0
137615
70772582
20.05
514151897 -6
137616
70753240
822.05
51- 6979948 -4
137617
70759359
1,010.86
51- 6979948 -4
137617
70759359
1,163.91
51- 6979948 -4
137617
70759359
3,324.64
51- 4966303 -1
137618
70558504
1,960.72
51- 6621207 -1
137645
70923841
890.05
51- 5847121 -5
137646
70937171
14,479.69
514888627 -1
137647
70874771
12,889.88
51- 5605640 -1
138063
71752076
36,583.58
100568 XEROX CORPORATION
104.00
MAY USAGE
137801
017800181
355.70
MAY 2006 USAGE
138006
017564719
389.79
TONER
138007
195059351
849.49
101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
5862.5513
5862.5513
1644.6107
5842.5513
5862.5513
1301.6610
1321.6185
1646.6185
5821.6185
5861.6185
5841.6185
1330.6185
5913.6185
5914.6185
5511.6185
5913.6185
5110.6151
1400.6230
1400.6230
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
VERNON OCCUPANCY
YORK OCCUPANCY
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
DISTRIBUTION
TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
DISTRIBUTION
EQUIPMENT RENTAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date
285534 6115/2006
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation
17.85
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
159.81
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
19.01
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
196.67
101091 ZIEGLER INC
345.00
GENERATOR CONTRACT -JUNE
345.00
1,378,244.92
Grand Total
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
6/15/2006 -- 6/15/2006
PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
00006431 137619 54060191 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
137701 54161875 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
137802 54060187 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
137702 E3809727
1551.6180
Payment Instrument Totals
Check Total 1,378,244.92
Total Payments 1,378,244.92
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
6113/2006 10:45:10
Page - 34
Business Unit
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
CITY HALL GENERAL
PSTF OCCUPANCY
CITY HALL GENERAL
R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EL
Council Check Summary
6/15/2006 - 6/15/2006
6/13/2 .46:59
Page - 1
Company
Amount
01000 GENERAL FUND
179,393.53
02100 CDBG FUND
37.00
02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND
3,776.60
04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND
507,847.00
04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND
26,872.06
05100 ART CENTER FUND
3,778.22
05200 GOLF DOME FUND
1,926.31
05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND
34,928.29
05400 GOLF COURSE FUND
8,459.35
05500 ICE ARENA FUND
- 23,023.73
05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND
8,022.55
05800 LIQUOR FUND
139,072.83
05900 UTILITY FUND
397,176.07
05930 STORM SEWER FUND
9,299.08
05950 RECYCLING FUND
33,958.00
07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND
674.30
Report Totals
1,378,244.92
We confirm to the best of our bw*io*
and belief, that these chime
comply in all material respects
with the requirements of the City
cf Edina purchasing ides and
procedures
Fins
City
ante
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
Mayor & City Council
From:
Wayne Houle, PE ��
City Engineer
Date:
June 20, 2006
Subject:
State Superfund Priority List
Info /Background:
Agenda Item
Consent
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends
Action
❑ To HRA
❑ To Council
❑Motion
❑Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Attached is a letter from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) regarding the addition
of Edina Well No. 7 to the State Superfund Priority List. As you might recall, in the spring of
2004, City staff and Council met to discuss the contamination of Well No. 7. This seasonal well
has not been online since the fall of 2003. The MPCA has been working with City staff, the
City's Consultant, and a MPCA Consultant to locate the contamination plume. The listing of this
site on the State Superfund Priority List will enable additional funds to help solve the
contamination issue. The MPCA, City Staff, and our Consultants are committed to resolving
this issue and we will continue to update the Council as more information becomes available.
r � �
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
v�
May 30, 2006
RE: Public Comment Period for Permanent List of Priorities
To Whom It May Concern:
Pursuant to the Minnesota Environment Response and Liability Act, Minn. Stat. § 115B.17
(2005), and Minn. R. ch. 7044 (2004), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and
Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is publishing for public comment the proposed
update of the State Superfund Priority List of releases or threatened releases of hazardous
substances, pollutants, or contaminants. Prior to updating the Superfund List, the MPCA and
MDA must solicit public comment on the proposed update for thirty (30) days. The public
comment period ends on June 30, 2006.
According to MPCAJMDA records, you may have an interest in one or more of the sites
proposed for addition to and deletion from the Superfund List. Therefore, please find enclosed a
copy of the May 30, 2006, State Register notice on this matter. If you have any comments,
please submit them as directed in the enclosed Public Notice. Should you know of additional
interested parties concerning this update, please advise them of the Public Notice and public
comment period.
Sincerely,
Michael Kanner
Section Manager
Superfiind and Emergency Response Section
Remediation Division
MK:csa
Enclosure
520 Lafayette Rd. N.; Saint Paul, MN 55155 -4194; (651) 296 -6300 (Voice); (651) 282 -5332 (TTY); www.pca.state.mn.us
St. Paul r Brainerd r Detroit Lakes r Duluth • Mankato a Marshall • Rochester • Willmar
Equal Opportunity Employer • Printed on recycled paper containing at least 20 percent fibers from paper recycled by consumers.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Remediation Division
Minnesota Department of Agriculture
Pesticide & Fertilizer Management Division
Notice of Proposed Update of the State Superfund Priority List ( Superfund List) (also known
as the Permanent List of Priorities or (PLP)) Among Releases or Threatened Releases of Hazardous
Substances or Pollutants or Contaminants
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), and
Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is publishing for public comment proposed additions
to and deletions from the State Superfund List which lists releases or threatened releases of
hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants for which the MPCA or MDA may take removal
or remedial actions under the Minnesota Environmental Response and Liability Act (MERLA),
Minn. Stat. § 115B.
Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 115B.17 (2005) and Minn. R. 7044.0950 (2004), the MPCA and
MDA is proposing the following changes to the Superfimd List.
The MPCA is proposing to add the following five sites to the PLP (Hazard Ranking Score
assigned pursuant to Minn. R. 7044.0350 follows the site): Edina Well Field Site, Hennepin County
(50); Rochester Ground Water Plume, Olmsted County (50); Minnesota Valley Landfill,
Scott County (14); Hibbing Gas Manufacturing Site, St. Louis County (11); and Esko Ground Water
Plume, Carlton County (8).
Each site has been assigned to Response Action Classes C and D (see Minn. R. 7044.0450).
The four response action classes are defined as follows: Class A - Declared Emergency;
Class B - Response Actions Completed and Operation and Maintenance/Long -Term Monitoring
Ongoing; Class C - Response Actions Necessary or in Progress or First Year Operation and
Maintenance at a Site; and Class D - Remedial Investigations and Feasibility Studies (RI/FS)
Necessary or in Progress.
In addition, the MDA is proposing to delete the following site from the PLP: Castle Rock
Ground Water Contamination Site, Dakota County.
The MDA has determined that either all MERLA Response Actions have been completed at
this site or that the site does not pose a threat to public health or welfare or the environment.
The MPCA and MDA invite members of the public to submit written comments on the
proposed additions to and deletion from the State Superfund List. All written comments with regard
to these proposed changes to the Superfund List must be received no later than 4:30 p.m. on
June 30, 2006.
Written comments regarding the proposed MDA deletion should be submitted to:
Robert Anderson, Incident Response Unit, Pesticide & Fertilizer Management Division,
Minnesota Department of Agriculture, 625 Robert Street North, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 -2538.
Written comments regarding the proposed MPCA additions to the Superfund List should be
submitted to: Gary L. Krueger, Superfund & Emergency Response Section, Remediation Division,
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, 520 Lafayette Road North, St. Paul,
Minnesota 55155 -4194.
Any interested person may submit a petition to the Commissioner of the MPCA requesting
that the UTCA Citizens' Board make the decision on whether to adopt these changes. to the
Superfund List that have been proposed by the MPCA and MDA. To be considered timely, the
petition must be received by the MPCA contact person, Gary L. Krueger, by 4:30 p.m. on
June 30, 2006.
The decision whether to adopt these proposed changes to the Superfund List will be made by
the MPCA Citizens' Board if (1) the MPCA Commissioner grants the petition requesting the
matter to be presented to the MPCA Citizens' Board; or (2) a MPCA Citizens' Board member
requests to hear the matter prior to'the time the MPCA Commissioner makes a final decision on the
proposed changes to the Superfund List.
All written comments received by the above deadline will be considered by the MPCA and
MDA in establishing the updated State Superfund List.
Sheryl A. Corrigan, Commissioner
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Gene Hugoson, Commissioner
Minnesota Department of Agriculture
5
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
Mayor & City Council
From:
Wayne Houle, PE�
City Engineer
Date:
June 20, 2006
Subject:
SAFETEA -LU Transit for
Livable Communities —
Bike/Walk Program
Info /Background:
Agenda Item
Consent
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends
Action
❑ To HRA
❑ To Council
❑Motion
❑Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
At the June 6, City Council meeting Council directed staff to research possible grants for
bikeways within Edina. Staff has researched what is currently available and what is in process.
As of this time there are no current grants available, however Edina may qualify for future
funding through the SAFETEA -LU Transit for Livable Communities Bike/Walk Program. As of
this time, neither one of the possible programs (see attached memo and handouts from Steve
Lillehaug) have established a process for qualifying for these grants. Staff will continue to
monitor the programs and alert the Council when these programs become available for
application.
DATE: June 15, 2006
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF EDINA
TO: Wayne Houle, City Engineer
FROM: Sj- Steve Lillehaug, Assistant City Engineer
SUBJECT: SAFETEA -LU Transit for Livable Communities - Bike/Walk Program
Under the SAFETEA -LU (Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A
Legacy for Users) transportation bill, the federal government designated $25 million in funding to
Minneapolis (one of four communities nationwide) for a pilot bike /walk program. The federal
guidelines for this program stipulate that the money will go to Minneapolis with consideration for
connections to adjoining communities - Edina may qualify to compete for this funding.
Transit for Livable Communities (TLC) will be the entity that carries out the program locally. TLC
staff has indicated that they are currently pursuing measures to formulate a Request for
Proposals for this program and will be assembling an advisory committee in the coming months.
City of Edina staff has requested to be included on the contact/notification list for this program.
Progress updates will be presented to the City Council in the upcoming months. Please see the
attached update provided by TLC and printout of the TLC web page for this program.
G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure\ Stn: ets\ MNDOT \SAFETEA_LU\TLC-2006 \6- 15-08_Memo to Council- 2006TMdoc
TLC Launches Walking and Bicycling Program
Transit for Livable Communities has been given the green light to proceed with a
$25 million 4 -year federal pilot program intended to help people reduce their
dependency on automobiles by improving conditions for walking and bicycling. The
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) announced on June 1, 2006 that TLC's
Work Plan for this innovative program was formally approved.
'We are pleased to be able to make these funds available to TLC," said Tim
Mitchell, FHWA transportation specialist. 'TLC has put together a very
comprehensive plan and we're encouraged by its commitment to strong public
involvement and making this a truly collaborative effort."
The Non - motorized Transportation
Pilot Project (NTP) was authorized by
the Federal Government last August
as part of the SAFETEA -LU
transportation bill. The Minneapolis
area is one of four communities
designated to serve as a pilot in
determining 'the extent to which
bicycling and walking can cant' a
significant part of the transportation
load, and represent a major portion of
the transportation solution." The other
three pilot communities are
Sheboygan, WI; Marin County, CA;
and Columbia, MO. Only in
Minnesota was an independent non-
profit (TLC) designated to cant' out
the program.
Eligible Projects under the NTP
• Network and project planning,
assessments of current conditions
• Construction plans, cost- estimates,
permits
• Safety projects to decrease bicycle and
pedestrian crashes
• Improved bicycle or pedestrian access to
transit hubs
• Infrastructure projects including bike
lanes, pathways, sidewalks, bridges and
tunnels
• Striping, signing, signalization, bike racks,
kiosks, showers and lockers.
• Data collection to assess mode shift,
environmental and health benefits
associated with program
• Education, promotion, communication,
and outreach related to non - motorized
transnortatinn.
One component of TLC's work plan is Program Evaluation. TLC has been working
closely with the FHWA and other pilot project communities to develop a
methodology to evaluate and measure the success of this program. In September
2006 baseline travel survey data will be collected to establish how many trips are
currently being made by bike or walking. This data will be compared to a "post -
survey' to be conducted in September 2010 after program implementation. The law
specifies that the communities document health benefits, energy conservation,
pollution reduction and any modal shift away from driving to walking and bicycling.
Using the language of the law, and subsequent interpretations by the FHWA the
Work Plan also clarifies the kinds of projects that will be eligible for the federal
funding, including the question of location. Funds can be used for education and
promotion as well as for the building of facilities. The focus is on Minneapolis with
consideration for connections from adjoining communities. The funds are available
until expended, require no match and cannot be used for other purposes.
Project Advisory Committee and first round of funding A Project Research and
Advisory Committee will advise the TLC Board of Directors on which projects to
fund, rating proposals on the basis of their ability to induce a shift from driving to
walking and bicycling. It is anticipated that a project solicitation process will be
announced later this summer with projects selected for funding in early 2007. Much
of the focus in 2006 will be on assessing the existing conditions and determining
where the greatest needs are. Some low -cost improvements will be advocated and
funded before larger sums are released.
Steve Clark to lead TLC's bicycling and walking program. In March, Transit for
Livable Communities hired Steve Clark to be the Program Manager for the new
bike -walk program. Steve's primary responsibility includes implementation of the
Non - Motorized Transportation Pilot Project. Steve has a strong background in
bicycling and walking. Steve was the first manager of the bicycling and walking
program in Boulder Colorado, he is a past president of the League of American
Bicyclists, and he oversaw development of the northern portion of the Ice Age trail in
Wisconsin. Steve has also written bike /pedestrian plans for a number of US cities.
If you have questions about the Non - motorized Transportation Program please
contact Steve (stevec@ticminnesota.org) or 651 - 767 -0298.
Transit for Livable Communities
JL
r.Z
HOME
Non- Motorized Transportation Pilot Program Update
ABOUT TLC
(April 2006)
CALENDAR
TLC hires Steve Clark
TRANSPORTATION
CHOICES NETWORK
Transit for Livable Communities has hired Steve Clark to be the Program Manager
for our new bike -walk program. Steve's primary responsibility includes
ALTERNATIVES
implementation of the Non - Motorized Transportation Pilot Project. Steve has a
TO DRIVING;
strong background in bicycling and walking. Steve was the first manager of the
Bus
bicycling and walking program in Boulder Colorado, he is a past president of the
Rail
League of American Bicyclists, and he oversaw development of the northern
Walking
g
portion of the Ice Age trail in Wisconsin. Steve has also written bike /pedestrian
plans for a number of US cities.
Biking
BENEFITS q1
Program Status
OF TRANSIT
Health
TLC is working on several key administrative tasks including development of a
Funding g
project work plan and budget for submittal to the Federal Highway Administration
Ecanomic Devleu me
and MnDOT, information gathering in conjunction with the other three pilot
Safe Y
communities on measurement and evaluation, exploration of a fiscal agency
relationship with a local government entity, and continued evaluation of best
Land Use
practices in bicycling and walking. Due to federal funding cuts and obligation
Congestion
limits, TLC and the other pilot communities have been informed that the first
TRANSIT LINKS
year funding for the pilot communities will be $5.3 million for 2006 rather than
the $6.25 that had been authorized in SAFETEA -LU.
Contact Us:
626 Selby Avenue
National Bike Summit
Saint Paul, MN 55104
(651) 767 -0298
Fax: (651) 221 -9831
TLC staff members Barb Thoman and Steve Clark joined a number of other
tic @ticminnesota.org
Minnesotans at the National Bike Summit in Washington DC last week. TLC, Marin
County, and the City of Columbia Missouri all participated in a conference session
about the pilot program. Thoman and Clark also met with members of the
Minnesota Congressional delegation including Congressman Oberstar, staff from
Congressman Sabo's and Congresswoman McCollum's offices, and key staff at the
Federal Highway Administration charged with oversight of the pilot program.
The League of American Bicyclists, the hosts of the National Bike Summit, held its
annual awards reception for "bicycle- friendly communities" as part of the event.
Forty -seven communities in the US have received special designation as a bicycle -
friendly community with Davis, California being the only city with the highest
designation - Platinum. Boulder, CO, Corvallis, OR, Palo Alto, CA, and Portland,
OR all have a gold designation -- the second highest rating. Ten cities including
Chicago have a silver designation and 31 cities are in the bronze category. No city
in Minnesota has yet participated in the program which began in September 2002.
For information on the awards program go to www.bikeleague.org
Briefing with MnDOT Staff
In late February, Lea Schuster and Barb Thoman, along with Tom Sorrel Minnesota
Division Director at Federal Highway, and Connie Kozlak from the Metropolitan
Council gave a short update on the status of the Non - Motorized Pilot Program to
Commissioner Carol Molnau and her staff. Commissioner Molnau said the
Page 1 of
Transit for Livable Communities
department is excited about the program and is looking forward to working with
all the partners. MnDOT has assigned Bob Works to be the department's contact
for the program.
Oberstar Forum
The annual Oberstar Forum (sponsored by the Center for Transportation Studies)
held on April 10th focused on bicycle and pedestrian travel. The keynote speaker
is Berthold Tillmann, the Mayor of Munster Germany, described how his city has
achieved a bicycle mode share approaching 40 percent. TLC Executive Director,
Lea Schuster participated in a panel discussion at the forum with the three other
communities that have been awarded Non - Motorized Transportation Pilot Program
grants. For more information see www.cts.umn.edu /oberstarforum
Project Advisory Committee
A project advisory committee (PAC) will be established to help guide the program
and advise the TLC Board. The PAC will draft program guidelines and selection
criteria, score project applications and help with program promotion and
evaluation. A kick -off meeting of the PAC, with a special presentation on best
practices and innovative projects, will held in May. TLC intends to keep the PAC
to an efficient and manageable size. We will provide many opportunities for
public participation in the development and implementation of the program.
Contact Steve Clark if you are interested in learning more about the PAC.
If you have questions about the Non - motorized Transportation Program please
contact TLC Walking and Bicycling Program manager Steve Clark
(stevec@ticminnesota.org).
Page 2 of
Page 1 of 1
Darlene Wallin
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 4:41 PM
To: Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com
Cc: Darlene Wallin; John Keprios
Subject: FW: Bredesen
Jennifer Bennerotte
Communications & Marketing Director
City of Edina
952 - 833 -9520
FAX 952 - 826 -0390
jennerotte@ci.edina.mn.us
From: MatrixUSA @aol.com [ma i Ito: MatrixUSA @aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 2:54 PM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: Bredesen
Please forward this to the City Council members, the consultant hired by the Park Board for
a needs assessment, and the Park Board Members
I am strongly opposed to changing the use of Bredesen Park. I am aware a group of
residents proposed building a nature building for educational purposes and other activities
that, to me, are not compatible with a natural area.
I have been using the trails 3 -4 times a week for over many years and like it just the way it is.
There are many of us that like the quiet and serenity afforded by an undeveloped area within
a few miles of our homes.
I would be very sad if buildings and groups of students or party goers invaded Bredesen. I
use the word invade because that is what it would feel like.
Further, the cost of the proposal is too great, there is a nature education center in Richfield,
and there are many places in town for gatherings.
Please keep me informed if this proposal gets past the proposal stage so I can come to the
Council meeting or Park Board meeting to speak against this.
Sandy Fox
6/14/2006
Darlene Wallin
crom:
Jennifer Bennerotte
,ent:
Tuesday, June 13, 2006 8:36 AM
ro:
Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com
Cc:
Darlene Wallin
Subject:
FW: Bredesen Park
Jennifer Bennerotte
Communications & Marketing Director
City of Edina
952 - 833 -9520
FAX 952 - 826 -0390
jbennerotte @ci.edina.mn.us
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Catherine Mulholland [mailto:mulho002Qtc.umn.edu]
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 9:08 PM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: Bredesen Park
I believe it would be a big mistake to make a Nature Center in Bredesen Park. There are
very little spaces of comparative wildness in the metropolitan area. We need those spaces
to enjoy on our own. I hope you can rethink this project!
Catherine Mulholland
6228 Oriole Lane
Edina, MN 55436
1
Darlene Wallin
7rom:
Jennifer Bennerotte
ent:
Friday, June 16, 2006 8:31 AM
To:
Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com
Cc:
Darlene Wallin
Subject:
FW: Bredesen Park
Jennifer Bennerotte
Communications & Marketing Director
City of Edina
952 - 833 -9520
FAX 952 - 826 -0390
jbennerotte @ci.edina.mn.us
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Nancy Wilbur [mailto:nlwilbur @yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 8:01 AM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: Bredesen Park
Dear Sirs:
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE don't destroy the natural quiet at Bredesen Park by building
there!!! The undeveloped nature of the park is what attracts those who go there.
Thanks for taking my opinion into consideration.
A Bredesen Walker, Nancy Wilbur
.o You Yahoo!?
Tired of Spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http: / /mail.yahoo.com
1
k� tL US
- �Qat,n�w�- e�cf�sid
far
hCL
� teO YV�edS vUlat
g fly zeaIt
VVai4,W -t-o ex+uldcd K41
+D ft-vj-t4A. *ealr 9evt�4e
aj
it"", upy. I ��
w b �&t vr�
• s
Mr. Erik R. Ellingson
1 R _ 14 /
vn
' —Lis
/r �!7•,III/� /J�1
r, J
IjII94
I
EDINA PARK BOARD
TUESDAY, MAY 9, 2006
7:00 P.M.
EDINA COUNCIL CHAMBERS
EDINA CITY HALL
MEMBERS PRESENT: Andy Finsness, Gordon Roland, Mike Damman, Karla Sitek, Ray
O'Connell, Jeff Johnson, George Klus
MEMBERS ABSENT: Linda Presthus, Jeff Sorem, Mike Weiss, Todd Fronek,
STAFF PRESENT: John Keprios, Ed MacHolda, Janet Canton, Ann Kattreh
OTHERS PRESENT: Idelle Longman, Russ Fortner, Marcia Friedman, Sally Maenner,
Fred Bertron, Julie Duckstad, Steve Halgren
I.
APPROVAL OF THE APRIL 11, 2006 PARK BOARD MINUTES
Ray O'Connell MOVED TO APPROVE THE APRIL 11, 2006 PARK BOARD
MINUTES. George Klus SECONDED THE MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED.
H. YOUTH SPORTS TASKFORCE RECOMMENDATIONS
Mr. Klus explained to the Park Board that the Edina Youth Sports Task Force has been a
very long but good process. He noted there was a lot of healthy discussion and he feels
what they have put together is a good representation of what they accomplished as a task
force. Mr. Klus stated that he would like to thank the task force members: Tom Asp,
Mary Brindle, Steve Dove, Russ Fortner, Molly Friedemann, Keith Harmon, Lynne
Morishita, Karla Sitek and Michael Weiss. He noted that these are good people within
the community who gave up a lot of their time to spend on this and therefore, we owe
them a great sense of gratitude. He noted that he would like to thank all of the
community members and associations who also gave of their time to give their input. In
addition, he would like to thank the staff who were at every meeting and put a lot of their
staff time into this to help direct them when they needed some direction.
Mr. Klus indicated that after the power point presentation he would hope that the Park
Board would pass a motion to approve the two documents: the Relationship Document
and the Core Values and Community Strategy Document, on to the City Council.
Mr. Klus gave a power point presentation (see attached).
Mr. Klus stated that there was great attendance and feedback from both the public and the
athletic associations. He pointed out that the task force had a good mix of people who
have been involved with boys and girls different sports. In addition, some of them have
served on the boards of the athletic associations and some gave good insight by going
back 20 to 30 years in the community. Mr. Klus noted that the community did show a
real interest in this and commented that at the end of every task force meeting there was
public testimony.
Mr. Klus stated that the task force realizes that not everyone is going to agree with this or
be happy with it, nor should they expect everyone to agree and be happy with it. He
stressed that they are not in the business of running the athletic associations, they don't
want to do that. Therefore, they have left enough doors open for them to set their own
policies and do their own things. The main idea is they want everyone to understand that
this is what the community stands for.
Mr. Johnson asked if the task force thought about using the word "fair" instead of
"equitable" under the Recommended Guidelines, number one. Mr. Klus explained that
the task force did have a lengthy discussion regarding that. He noted that they felt that by
using the word "equitable" they want to make sure that the associations are treating the
kids fairly. The task force is not necessarily interested in making sure that everyone gets
equal playing time, they just ask that they be fair. He commented that they definitely
debated it but in the end felt "equitable" better handled what they are trying to do.
Mr. Johnson commented that in regards to the Relationship Document, number eight if
you read Ms. Presthus letter she states that she would like to see the word "mandate"
replaced with "requires ". He noted that he also agrees the word "requires" is more
appropriate. Mr. Klus responded that the task force did talk about that but in the end still
felt that "mandate" was the better word to use. He explained that they are not telling the
athletic associations how often they do mandate checks, they just want to make sure that
background checks are done on everyone who has access to Edina's youth. Mr. Finsness
asked Mr. Johnson if he thinks there is a big difference between the "mandate" and
"requires" or is it that he just feels it's a nicer word. Mr. Johnson replied that he does
think "requires" sounds nicer but that there is not a major problem with it.
Mr. Johnson stated that he thinks the task force spent a lot of time on this and did a nice
job, which he truly appreciates. However, his only other concern is with the ad hoc
grievance committee. He explained that he is a hockey coach with the Edina Hockey
Association (EHA) and what worries them is someone may read something into this
document and say they are going to take their grievance past the association and staff
level and go directly to ad hoc grievance committee. He commented that his concern is
the ad hoc committee is made up of people who don't know anything about the
procedures of EHA, thus they are going to make a decision based on not knowing what
EHA has gone through or what they need to do. Mr. Klus explained that if a grievance
leaves the association it would then go on to the staff level. He indicated that personally
he would hope that most things would be settled at the staff level. However, if they are
not, it's up to staff to make sure that when they put together an ad hoc committee that
2
they educate the committee on everything that has happened. Mr. Klus stressed that he
has faith that staff will make sure that it's fair if it goes that far. He stated that the task
force feels that the best way to do that is with presidents from other associations because
they understand what it takes to run an association.
Mr. Finsness asked if everyone on the task force was happy with the end result to which
Mr. Klus replied that he thinks everyone was satisfied. Mr. Klus commented that
everyone compromised somewhat and therefore they were able to come up with the most
fair and best document they could. He noted that he thinks the task force was pleased
that they were able to have a great starting point that can be evaluated and looked at by
the Park Board once a year. He explained that they would like to get it out there and
tested and if changes need to be made he thinks the Park Board would do a good job.
Russ Fortner, Edina Youth Sports Task Force Member, indicated that as everyone knows
their biggest problem isn't the kids, it's the parents. If a parent is upset they'll take their
grievance as far as they can and at least now they have something for everyone to look at
and be aware of Mr. Fortner thanked everyone on the task force and on behalf of the
task force thanked Mr. Klus for all of the time and effort he put into leading this.
Mr. O'Connell stated that this it is such a good product and asked how it would be
distributed. Mr. Klus replied that once it's passed by the Park Board it's up to staff to get
the word out to the associations because that is part of their relationship with the
associations.
Mr. Finsness asked how many grievances are there typically in one year based on what's
happened in the past to which Mr. Keprios replied that they average between one and two
a year. However, that depends on what is qualified as a grievance. He explained that Mr.
MacHolda fields phone calls almost on a daily basis, which he does a wonderful job
facilitating through diplomacy and problem solving as do all of his staff. Mr. Keprios
pointed out that most grievances are solved at the staff level. Mr. Keprios also pointed
out two locations in the Relationship Document that refers to the Core Values Document
as a "resolution." Mr. Keprios stated he will make that correction on the Relationship
Document.
Mr. Finsness, on behalf of the Park Board, thanked Mr. Klus for his time, passion and
leadership in carrying this forward.
Ray O'Connell MOVED TO APPROVE THE YOUTH SPORTS TASKFORCE
RECOMMENDATIONS TO ADOPT THE YOUTH SPORTS CORE VALUES AND
COMMUNITY STRATEGY AND ADOPT THE RELATIONSHIP DOCUMENT
WITH THE CORRECTIONS AS POINTED OUT BY MR. KEPRIOS George Klus
SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
3
III. RECEIVE PETITION — ARDEN PARK HOCKEY RINK OFF -LEASH DOG
AREA PROPOSAL
Mr. Finsness indicated that, per Sally Maenner's, Edina Resident, request and petition to
allow Arden Park Hockey Rink to be used as an off -leash dog area, Mr. Keprios is
recommending that the Park Board consider asking questions regarding this in the
upcoming needs assessment survey. He noted that this way they would be able to get
statistical data that measures the level of community need and support for the concept.
Mr. Keprios stated that perhaps Ms. Maenner could be part of a focus group as part of the
needs assessment process to come up with some ideas to create more off -leash dog areas
in the Edina hockey rinks as opposed to establishing just one hockey rink as an off -leash
dog area. He noted that he senses they are going to need a little more community support
than just the one petition because it is a much bigger issue than one hockey rink.
Mr. Johnson commented that he likes the idea.
Ms. Maenner noted that she lives on Woodcrest Drive, which is pretty close to Arden
Park, and the one thing that was most enlightening to her is how a lot of people who live
adjacent to the park feel that it sort of becomes their backyard. She indicated that she met
with two people who were absolutely emphatic that this would never happen to which she
was very surprised. She commented that she doesn't believe there is anywhere in Edina
where she can throw a ball on a public piece of land and not have the animal control
officer chase her down. Ms. Maenner stated that she thinks there's a fear with some of
the neighbors who are strongly opposed to this that it would become a huge draw to
which she doesn't think that would be the case. She explained that for the last three years
people have been using the hockey rink as a dog training area with absolutely no
problems. However, during the last six months some neighbors have become quite upset
and that's when the crackdown started. She added that she appreciates anything the Park
Board can do and added that she would be happy to be part of a task force.
Mr. Damman asked Mr. Keprios if he was able to talk to Eden Prairie's Park Director
regarding their use of hockey rinks as off -leash dog areas. Mr. Keprios replied that he
did meet with Bob Lambert, Eden Prairie's Park Director, and they did visit Eden
Prairie's various off -leash dog sites. He noted that he found it very interesting that during
the middle of the day, when most people are at work, there were dogs and their owners at
every single site. He commented that Eden Prairie Park Director Bob Lambert feels that
using four of their outdoor hockey rinks as off -leash dog areas has been very successful.
Jeff Johnson MOVED THAT THE CONCEPT OF USING OUR OUTDOOR HOCKEY
RINKS AS OFF -LEASH DOG AREAS BE PLACED ON THE UPCOMING NEEDS
ASSESSMENT SURVEY. Karla Sitek SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
4
i
IV. POINT DRIVE PARK PROPERTY
Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that in their packet there should be two maps of the
property in question. He explained that the question at hand is would the city be willing
to relinquish this property back to the State of Minnesota and after a lengthy process it
would be given back to the City or County to sell it directly to the person who wants to
buy it. He pointed out that it can happen that way if the Park Board makes a
recommendation worded in that way to which it would then go on to the City Council.
Therefore, the long and the short of it is the city would give the property back to the State
of Minnesota with the caveat that it only be sold to the person who's interested in
purchasing the property . Mr. Keprios pointed out that in his letter exchange from the
other property owner, who lives next to this piece of property, the other party is not
interested in acquiring it and would support their neighbor acquiring the property. Mr.
Keprios explained that what would happen is the property owner would pay the back
taxes that are due as part of the purchase of the property.
Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that, from the City's standpoint, it's listed as for
park purposes only; however, in his view it doesn't really serve any park purposes. He
noted that there is no public access to the small parcel of land other than via the lake.
Therefore, his recommendation to the Park Board is to do what has been requested. Mr.
Keprios commented that if anything, he views it as a liability for the city.
Ray O'Connell MOVED THAT THE PARK BOARD RECOMMEND TO THE CITY
COUNCIL THAT THE CITY CONVEY THE TAX FORFEITED PROPERTY BACK
TO THE STATE OF MINNESOTA WITH THE CAVEAT THAT THE PROPERTY
MUST BE SOLD TO THE PROPERTY OWNERS OF 6704 POINT DRIVE WITH
THE UNDERSTANDING THAT ULTIMATELY THE CITY OR COUNTY WILL
OFFER THE LAND FOR SALE TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS WHO
WILL THEN PAY ANY TAXES OWED ON THE PROPERTY. Jeff Johnson
SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
V. ADVERTISING AGREEMENT — EDINBOROUGH PARK
Ann Kattreh, Assistant Manager of Edinborough Park, informed the Park Board that
since September of 2003, when they started charging for the lower level in the Great
Hall, they have had an inflatable jumper which takes up half of the area. She noted that it
has been a phenomenally popular attraction to the Park and gets used daily from 9:00 am
to 9:00 pm.
Ms. Kattreh indicated that their jumper has lasted for a couple of years and even though
they've made several repairs they have actually been very pleased. She explained that
they have gone through a couple of blowers but the original jumper fmally went down
about a month ago. Therefore, they have been contracting with a company that rents
jumpers for special events, etc. who approached her with the idea of giving them a
�1
jumper free of charge in lieu of advertising on the jumper. There would be a small sign
on the jumper that would say sponsored by Magic Bounce with their phone number and
business cards. She noted that the company has dozens of jumpers that come in all
different shapes and sizes to which she can go onto their website and pick out any jumper
at any time. She stated that, in addition, he would also be willing to bring over any huge
slide jumpers and obstacle jumpers for special events free of charge.
Ms. Kattreh pointed out that if they were to purchase a jumper it would cost
approximately $2,000 to which they would get about two years use out of it. She added
that a blower for the jumper costs approximately $500.00. She stated that in the previous
jumper they probably put $500.00 worth of repairs into it during those two years.
Mr. Keprios explained that it is City policy that they are to deal with all of these
advertising requests and sponsorship requests on a case by case basis, therefore, the Park
Board has an opportunity to give their thoughts on the matter.
Mr. Damman stated that it certainly sounds like a win, win to him. Mr. Johnson replied
yes, they should do it.
Jeff Johnson MOVED TO ACCEPT THE AGREEMENT FOR THE JUMPER, MAGIC
BOUNCE INCORPORATED FREE JUMPER IN LIEU OF SOME ADVERTISING
BANNER. Mike Damman SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
VI. ADVERTISING ON GYMNASIUM AND BRAEMAR ATHLETIC FIELD
Mr. Keprios asked the Park Board whether or not they felt it would be appropriate to
pursue advertising on the scoreboards for the two new gymnasiums and/or the athletic
field at Braemar Park if they were unable to fund it through other means. He explained
that he thinks there is a good likelihood that with the gymnasiums they'll be able to cover
everything through the bonding, however, he can't say that with 100% certainty. Mr.
Keprios asked the Park Board how they would feel if they at least pursued getting some
monies through advertising for the scoreboard at Braemar. He commented that he rather
doubts they are going to get advertising dollars to pay for the whole thing, but at least it
would help to cut off a chunk of it.
Mr. O'Connell indicated that for years he's been trying to get Braemar Golf Course to
use advertisers like many of the other golf courses do. However, John Valliere, the golf
course manager, does not want advertising throughout the course. Mr. O'Connell
commented that Edina needs money too and there are a lot of advertisers out there that
would want to do this. He indicated that in this instance he would support using
advertising for scoreboards as long as it's on city property or for city facilities.
6
Ray O'Connell MOVED THAT MR. KEPRIOS BE AUTHORIZED TO PURSUE THE
ADVERTISING PANEL AS A SOURCE OF FUNDING FOR THE SCOREBOARDS.
Karla Sitek SECONDED THE MOTION.
Mr. Johnson noted that he's assuming there are currently policies in place of who we will
and will not take because obviously there are current advertisers they cannot use. Mr.
Keprios replied that they have the right to limit who they will allow to advertise, it needs
to be appropriate.
Mr. Finsness asked if there is a specific length of time that the advertisers would have to
which Mr. Keprios replied that they would have a contract just like they currently do at
the Courtney Ball Fields.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
VII. SCHOOL DISTRICT STORAGE BUILDING REQUEST FOR CREEK VALLEY
PARK
Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that he was just informed yesterday afternoon that
the architect was not able to get a site plan done by the surveyor in time. Therefore, they
do not have a specific site plan to be reviewed. Mr. Keprios asked that this be deferred to
the June Park Board meeting.
VIII. NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEY CONSULTING FIRMS' PROPOSALS
Mr. Finsness informed the Park Board that the Needs Assessment Survey Ad Hoc
Committee met at 6:00 pm tonight prior to the Park Board meeting. He indicated that
they discussed the five requests for proposals. He stated that "Leisure Vision" is the
company that everyone liked the most, and the Ad Hoc Committee unanimously
recommends Leisure Vision.
Mr. Johnson asked if cost wise they were all pretty comparable and Mr. Finsness replied
they are. Mr. Finsness stated that quotes are between $13,000 and $20,000 to which
Leisure Vision's quote is between $13,000 - $15,000 but that could be stepped up a little
bit if they wanted some extra add on. He. commented that their budget is $19,000 so they
are definitely in the ballpark.
Mr. Keprios stated that what he thinks the Park Board is asking for is to empower Mr.
Finsness and staff to come up with a contract package to go ahead with Leisure Vision.
By consensus, the Park Board gave their approval to move forward with Leisure Vision
and empower Mr. Keprios to negotiate a contract with assistance from the Ad Hoc
Committee.
7
IX. PARK BOARD MEMBER PARK ASSIGNMENTS
Mr. Finsness asked the Park Board to look over their park assignments and see if
everything looks correct. He indicated that if anyone would like to exchange parks with
other Park Board members to let Ms. Canton know. Ms. Canton will have the master
copy and will see that it is displayed accurately on the website.
Mr. Finsness stated that now is probably a good time of year to go into the parks and see
what's going on and bring any feedback to future Park Board meetings.
Ray O'Connell praised the letter that Mr. Keprios sent to Minnesota Vikings owner,
Ziggy Wilf. On Ray's request, Mr. Keprios mailed a letter to Mr. Wilf to let him know
that the City of Edina may be interested in acquiring the Minnesota Viking Winter Park
property and facilities should the Vikings relocate to Blaine or other community.
X. ADJOURNMENT
Mike Damman MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 8:30 PM. Karla Sitek
SECONDED THE MOTION. MEETING ADJOURNED.
8
Edina Youth Sports
Task Force
Final Recommendation
Background
• The Youth Sports Task force was created in
response to residents concerns to address:
• Priority access to public facilities
• Determine the City's role and relationship as it
relates to these programs
• Mission of the Taskforce:
The mission of the Edina Youth Sports is to
define the roles and responsibilities of City
staff, Park Board and City Council as it
relates to Edina's independently
incorporated youth athletic associations.
Background cont.
■ Identify Issues and Concerns Cont...
• There are too many scheduled programs for kids and not enough
scheduled free time.
• Access to participation.
• There seems to be a need to educate the public on how athletic
associations function.
• What level of oversight and control should government have of youth
athletic associations?
• Do traveling team participants get more access to facilities?
• What are other communities doing regarding these issues?
• Is there an issue/serve the greater good
• How and why did the Taskforce get formed and under what criteria
were Taskforce members chosen?
Introduction
• Youth Sports are one Edina's greatest
community strengths
• Develop positive traits and life values in our
youth
• Teaches youth to abide by the rules, accept
winning an losing, and respect authority figures
• Research has shown that youth who
participate in sports perform better in school
and are less likely to partake in unhealthy
activities
Background cont.
■ Identify Issues and Concerns
■ On November 10, 2005 the task force invited
the public to state issues and concerns they
have regarding youth athletics
• Public concerns appear to be different than the Taskforce mission
statement
• Is there a need for a youth sports oversight board?
• What is an elite team?
• Public money - resource allocation to private teams vs. different
participant fees.
• What is the government's role in dealing with over scheduled youth
which results in a lack of family time?
Background Cont.
■ Identified Issues and Concerns Cont...
• What oversight venues are currently in place?
• The biggest problem that should concern government is the current
lack of public facilities.
• What should be the role of the Park Board and City Council in
providing an appropriate number of facilities?
• What is the effect on a child when picking elite teams at a young
age?
• If the City is going to assume more control and oversight of youth
athletic associations, then the City should provide more structure in
the area of providing medical personnel at games, practices, and
tournaments.
Community Input
■ Public Hearing — General Public
■ December 8, 2005
■ Public Hearing — Athletic Associations
■ January 12, 2006
■ Public Testimony — Every Meeting
Core Values Cont.
3. We believe that the most important underlying mission for
every youth athletic association is to develop emotionally,
socially, and physically healthy children; and
4. We believe that youth sports programs conducted under the
right conditions are enormously beneficial for children; and
5. We recognize the need to ensure that Edina's youth athletic
association programs provide athletic programs that are safe,
positive, fun, physically and psychologically age - appropriate,
educational, teaches values and ethics, strengthens the
community, promotes competition without conflict, open to all
residents of all abilities and should not be denied an opportunity
to participate based on ability, offer a reasonable number of
events, and are administered by qualified volunteers; and
Core Values Cont.
9. We recognize the need to ensure that Edina's youth athletic
associations form and advertise a formal grievance process by
which residents are assured of an appropriate venue and process
to hear their grievances in a manner that is open, fair, and just;
and
The City of Edina in a meeting duly assembled and by the
authority thereof, recognize and encourage official
implementation of this Community Strategy to improve the
culture of youth sports for all participants.
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS day of
2006.
Signed:
Mayor of Edina
Recommendation
Adoption of "Youth Sports Core Values and Community
Strategy"
1. The City of Edina believes in the benefits and attraction of youth
sports as a means to teach the children of this community values and
skills that will be of benefit to them throughout life; and
2. We believe that Edina's youth athletic associations develop
ftadamental internal and external assets for children by prong
opportmities to develop positive character traits and life values where
children can learn a multitude of important lessons and valuable
fimdamentals, such as ethics, abiding by the rules, winning and losing
with grace, coping with success and failme, always trying to do your
best, respecting authority figures, learning about team work,
developing fimdamental motor skills and sports specific knowledge;
and
Core Values Cont.
6. We believe that youth sports association league organizers and
administrators must be educated on how to provide a safe,
positive, and fun youth sports environment before being granted
access to public facilities; and
7. We believe volunteer coaches and parents must receive
orientation and education as to the individual roles and
responsibilities in our community's effort to raise the standards
of youth sports programs and that volunteer coaches and parents
be held accountable for their behaviors; and
8. We believe it is necessary and desirable to establish guidelines,
requirements and standards for youth sports associations
utilizing public facilities; and
Recommendation
YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION'S RELATIONSHIP WITH THE
EDINA PARK BOARD AND THE PARK AND RECREATION STAFF
(RELATIONSHIP DOCUMENT)
The mission of the Edina Park and Recreation Department is to do our
part in fiuther developing, preserving, and maintaining the City of
Edina's parks, recreation programs, and resources as a premier and
comprehensive park and recreation department in the Twin Cities area.
This relationship document between the Edna Park and Recreation
Department, Park Board, and with each association, establishes a
common set of guidelines that are to be adopted by all athletic
associations. The intent of these guidelines is to ensure that
associations are mindful of the public's desire for positive and healthy
athletic experiences for children and families in our community.
Relationship Agreement Cont.
The "Youth Sports Core Values and Community Strategy,"
established by the Edina Park Board in cooperation with the Edina
Park and Recreation Department, is to be adopted by all
associations. The Community Strategy defines the City's core
values and philosophy in the delivery of the community's youth
sports programs-
1. Edina Park and Recreation Department will provide facilities and
fields for boys and girls at each age group within the association.
2. It is the City of Edma's view that the public is best served when
there is only one independently incorporated youth athletic
association per sport. The City of Edina also understands and
supports that in some cases the public and volunteers are best
served by having the traveling component of a particular sport
administered by its own independent youth athletic association.
Recommended Guidelines
The Edina Park Board expects that all associations follow these
mhdmal guidelines in the operation of their association:
1. All boys and girls have a fit, positive, safe, age - appropriate,
educational experience that is open to all residents of all abilities,
and receive equal opportunity to participate at whatever ability
level they may play.
2. Boys and girls build good sportsmanship and character, learn to
be a team member, learn to accept discipline; incorporate
psychological and physical health.
3. Boys and girls, at each level of play, will receive basic
fundamental and skill training in the sport in which they
participate.
Guidelines Cont.
8. The Park and Recreation Department mandates background checks
on all individuals 18 8c older who serve as a coach, referee, and each
person serving on the Board of Directors in any association. It is our
intent to protect our children, families and the associations.
9. To ensure that the public has an open, fair and just process to
handle grievances that are not resolved at the association board or
staff level, the City of Edna will facilitate a grievance process. (See
Appendix 1.1) This grievance process is not intended to deal with
team assignment, coach assignment or tryout process grievances.
10. The Edna Park and Recreation Department shall establish
minimum insurance requirements of each and every association that
uses Ed na's public athletic facilities. This insurance shall provide for
the protection of volunteers, associations, and the City of Edna.
(referred to insurance consultant)
Relationship Agreement cons.
3. The Edina Park and Recreation Department in
cooperation with the Park Board will help each
association plan, and provide safe and well maintained
public athletic facilities to meet the youth sports
programs, and give professional staff liaison services
regarding the openation of their association, and offer
appropriate clerical and administrative support services.
4. The Edina Park and Recreation Department shall act as a
liaison between the associations and the Edina Park
Board to assist associations in providing a well rounded
and equitable program for all participants.
Guidelines Cont.
4. Associations manage team schedules and provide equitable
playing time for each level of competition within the age group.
5. Associations shall have a common code of conduct for players,
coaches and parents.
6. Qualified citizen volunteers should serve in positions as Board
of Directors. Board of Directors must have knowledge of the
program/sport. Associations are encouraged to have open
member elections to elect Board of Directors.
7. Edina Park and Recreation Department personnel shall attend at
least semi - annually association board meetings. Department
personnel shall be available and provide resource help to
associations in training of coaches, operations, and other
functions with which the association needs assistance.
Guidelines Cont.
11. The Edina Park Board and Park and Recreation
Department shall provide and review annually guidelines to
be followed by all associations and users of facilities and
gymnasiums in our community as to the priority use of the
Edina School District's gymnasiums and facilities, and the
Edina community, practice and game facilities. This is to
assure a fair allocation of gymnasiums and facilities use for
all participants, at all levels.
3
Guidelines Cont.
It is imperative that all associations, coaches, board
members, volunteers and parents understand and appreciate
the positive experience that is desired for all participants in
Edina youth sports. Therefore, the'Edina Park and
Recreation Department and Park Board mandate that all
new parents, volunteers, coaches, board members, etc., who
participate in associations must read, understand and sign a
copy of the relationship agreement and Core Values and
Community Strategy. Signed copies of these documents
will be kept on file with the association.
Grievance Process Cont.
The Ad -Hoc Grievance Committee will be made up of three
association presidents who are not president of the association
in question, plus two Park Board members. Those five
individuals will hear the complaint and make
recommendations to solve the grievance matter. If the Ad-
Hoc Grievance Committee's recommendations do not satisfy
the parties involved then the grievance will be referred to the
Park Board for a final decision.
The Ad -Hoc Grievance Committee will be formed only on an
as needed basis to deal with issues on a case by case basis.
Grievance Process Cont.
Step #3: If the issue is unresolved at the staff level, then staff will
assemble the Ad -Hoc Grievance Committee to hear the complaint
With staff assistance and input from the parties involved, the Ad-
Hoc Grievance Committee will hear the complaint and make
recommendations.
It will be the Ad -Hoc Grievance Committee's duty to determine
whether or not the association has acted in a manner that is
contrary to the City's philosophy and core values; and if so, make
recommendations to correct the situation. It will not be the Ad-
Hoc Grievance Committee's duty to micro - manage program
decisions of Edina's youth athletic associations.
Grievance Process
The City of Edina demands that each youth athletic
association must have in place a well-documented and
publicized grievance process by which residents are assured
of an appropriate venue and process to hear their grievances
in a manner that is open, fair, and just. If the youth athletic
association board grievance process does not resolve the
issue, then the matter will be referred to Park and Recreation
Department staff. If staff is unable to resolve the issue, the
matter should then be referred to the Ad -Hoc Grievance
Committee.
Grievance Process Cont.
The following escalation shall be followed:
Step # l: Follow the written grievance procedure as established and
publicized for each youth athletic association.
Step #2: If. in the complainant's view, the issue was not resolved in
Step #1, then the complainant should contact Park and
Recreation Department staff, who will do the following:
A. Evaluate the complaint
B. Determine and judge whether or not the issue can or should
be resolved through diplomacy. If so, staff will facilitate a
problem - solving process at the staff level with the appropriate
community members and volunteers involved.
Grievance Process Cont.
Step #4: If the parties involved are still not satisfied with the Ad -Hoc
Grievance Committee's recommendations, the final step is to refer
the matter to the Park Board for a final decision.
Both parties must abide by the Park Board's decision or they could
face sanctions.
4
Page 1 of 2
Darlene Wallin
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 11:05 AM
To: Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com
Cc: Darlene Wallin
Subject: FW: "Tall buildings in wrong places"
Jennifer Bennerotte
Communications & Marketing Director
City of Edina
952 - 833 -9520
FAX 952 - 826 -0390
jbennerotte @ci.edina.mn.us
From: Dkolson613 @aol.com [mailto:Dkolson613 @aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 4:29 PM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: 'Tall buildings in wrong places"
To the City Council:
Well, the City Council went and did it again. Yet, another "tall building in the wrong place"
This time, one to be set down right in the middle of a beautiful park. The "famous
majority -of- three" should have looked around a bit. If you start at the Radison
Hotel and drive east on the freeway and you're looking for tall buildings you would
have found they hug the freeway system. But the "famous- majority -of- three"
broke this pattern big -time. Two tall buildings that will over -whelm the two respective
neighbor- hoods. Very simply a very bad decision from the "famous- majority -of- three ".
The tragedy begins when the developer comes in and removes all those beautiful
blue spruce that surround the present building. Can you imagine the noise, the
dirt and dust, the pollution, when they come in with their wrecking balls, graters,
cranes and trucks that will be part of the park and the lake, probably for at least two
years?
I applaud Council- members Alice Hulbert and Linda Masica for their steadfast
opposition to "tall buildings in the wrong place ". Thank you from me and I'm sure
many people in our fair city.
The box score reads:
Big Business - 3
Good citizens of Edina - 2
Not anything to be proud of.
Duaine Olson
7601 Edinborough Way
6/7/2006
v
40 1
ASSO[Iat1011 Of
Metropolitan
Municipalities
DATE: June 9, 2006
TO: AMM Members
FROM: Steve Larson, AMM President
SUBJECT: 2006 AMM Policy Committees
AMM is currently seeking volunteers to serve on our four summer policy
committees— Housing & Economic Development, Metropolitan Agencies,
Transportation & General Government and Municipal Revenues & Taxation.
Enclosed you will find a description of each committee and a sign -up form.
This is one time of year when AMM really depends on the active participation of all
of our members. We need your involvement in order to develop strong, clear policy
positions that will direct our work and represent your interests at the capitol and at the
Met Council.
To join your colleagues from other metro -area cities in serving on an AMM policy
committee, simply return the enclosed form by July 5, 2006: If you have any
questions, please call Laurie Jennings at (651) 215 -4000.
NOTE: This bulletin was mailed to mayors, managers /administrators,
councilmembers and individuals that served on our 2005 summer policy committees.
However, all city employees, including fmance directors, community development
and planning directors, and city engineers are welcome to participate. Therefore, we
would appreciate it if you would route this information to these individuals.
145 University Avenue West
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55103 -2044
Telephone: (651) 215 -4000
Fax: (651) 281 -1299
E -mail: amm @amm145.org
The following committees annually
develop policy based on input from
member city representatives. The
committees submit their policy
recommendations to the Board for
review, modification and distribution
to the general membership. The
membership meets in November
before each legislative session to
debate and adopt the AMMpolicies.
Metropolitan Agencies
onsiders legislative issues and
other policies related to the
Met Council and metro agen-
cies. It monitors the structure and
relationship between the regional and
local units of government and reviews
amendments to the Metro Develop-
ment Guide Policy Chapters. It has
previously developed policy on land
use planning, solid waste management
and the Met Council selection process.
It reviews the council's yearly budget
and this year will monitor the policies
and plans being developed to imple-
ment the Growth Management plan.
Municipal Revenues
onsiders any matter concern
ing city revenues, property
taxes and city expenditures,
including state aid formulas and
dollars, levy limits, property tax
assessments and fiscal disparities.
Housing &
Economic Development
onsiders all issues related to
economic development and
housing, including affordable
housing and activities of the metro
HRA (Housing and Redevelopment
Authority). It also reviews all amend-
ments to the Met Council's Housing
Guide Policy Chapter and develops
policy dealing with economic develop-
ment issues, HRAs, TIF (Tax Incre-
ment Financing) and development
authorities.
Transportation &
General Government
onsiders all major issues
related to air and surface
transportation, including
funding sources at all government
levels, and issues which have impact
on metropolitan area cities outside the
scope of other AMM committees.
AMM members of the Transportation
Advisory Board (TAB) and Technical
Advisory Committee (TAC) are encour-
aged to join, along with other city
officials. This committee has developed
policy on issues such as municipal
consolidation, pensions, PELRA,
comparable worth, data privacy, con-
tractor licensing and local control/
authority.
1
ASSO(latlon of 'Association of Metropolitan Municipalities
etro p olitan Policy Committee Sign -up Form for 2006
Municipalities
Transportation & General Government—Chair Dave Osberg, Hastings Admr.
Check box to sign up
15`
2°
3`
4 th
Monday
Monday
Monday
Monday
July 24, 2006
August 14, 2006
August 28, 2006
September 18, 2006
St. Croix Room
St. Croix Room
St. Croix Room
St. Croix Room
11:30 am - 1:30 pm
11:30 am -1:30 pm
11:30 am - 1:30 pm
1:00 — 3:00 p.m.
Municipal Revenue &' Taxation —Chair Marcia Glick, Robbinsdale —City Mgr.
Check box to sign up
I'
2°
3`
4 th
Tuesday
Tuesday
Tuesday
Tuesday
July 25, 2006
August 15, 2006
August 29, 2006
September 19, 2006
St. Croix Room
St. Croix Room
St. Croix Room
St. Croix Room
11:30 am — 1:30 pm
11:30 am — 1:30 pm
11:30 am — 1:30 pm
11:30 am — 1:30 prn
Metropolitan Agencies —Chair Anne Hurlburt, Plymouth - -Comm. Dev. Dir.
Check box to sign up
15`
2°
3`
4 th
Wednesday
Wednesday
Wednesday
Wednesday
-July 26, 2006
August 16, 2006
- August 30, 2006
September 20, 2006
St. Croix Room
St Croix Room
St. Croix Room
St. Croix Room
11:30 am — 1:30 pm
11:30 am — 1:30 pm
11:30 am — 1:30 pm
9:30 — 11:30 a.m.
Housing and Economic Development —Chair Jan Callison, Minnetonka Mayor
Check box to si2 up
15f
2"
3`
4 tb
Thursday
(Friday)
Thursday
Thursday
July 27, 2006
August 18, `06
August 31, 2006
September 14, 2006
St. Croix Room
Blue Mound Room
St. Croix Room
Blue Mound Room
11:30 am— 1:30 p.m.
10:30 am - 12:30 pm
11:30 am— 1:30 p.m.
12:30 — 2:30 p.m.
Name:
Title:
City:
Address:
Phone:
Email:
_ssues which should be studied:
Fax:
updates and meeting reminders will be emailed
Please mail or fax completed form to: Attn: Laurie Jennings, AMM 145 University Ave W, St. Paul,
MN 55103. Fax: 651 - 281 -1299 Phone: 651 - 215 -4000
MINUTES
APRIL 19, 2006
EDINA RECYCLING AND SOLID WASTE COMMISISON
COMMUNITY CONFERENCE ROOM
MEMBERS PRESENT: Bill Bryan, Inna Hays, Marley Hanson, Kathy Frey, and
Diane Plunkett- Latham
MEMBERS ABSENT: Tim Brownell
STAFF PRESENT: Solvei Wilmot, Recycling Coordinator
CALL TO ORDER
Bill Bryan, Chair, called the meeting to order at 7:05 a.m.
MINUTES
Ms. Hays, MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FROM THE MARCH 15, 2006,
MEETING. Ms. Hanson SECONDED. MOTION CARRIED.
VOLUNTEER AWARD
Allied Waste is sponsoring the representatives from Project Earth that are being honored
at the Volunteer Award Reception. Commission members thanked Allied Waste for their
contribution.
COUNCIL WORKSHOP IN MAY
Ms. Plunket- Latham MOVED TO WITHDRAW WORKSHOP APPOINTMENT DUE
TO THE LIMITED PUBLIC INVOLVMENT WITH WORKSHOP MEETINGS. No
Second.
Members discussed issues to present to City Council at the workshop.
RECYCLING SCHOLARSHIP
There are four applications from students seeking one of the two $500 scholarships.
Commission members were asked to review the applications, prioritize their preference,
and then report the choices to Ms. Wilmot. She will then contact the Edina Education
Fund with the selections. Commission members thanked Allied Waste for the $1,000
contribution to the Edina Foundation which is used to fund the scholarship program.
OTHER BUSINESS
• Ms. Plunkett- Latham expressed concern about the possibility of more haulers
seeking a license to work in Edina should garbage be allowed at the curb. Ms.
Wilmot commented that other communities which have open hauling do not have
an extraordinary amount of licenses. Ms. Plunkett- Latham inquired if a limit on
the number of licensed issued could be established. Ms. Wilmot will follow -up.
• Members discussed the impact a different set -out location for garbage would have
on a small hauler.
• Mr. Hirstein from Allied Waste reported that revenue sharing for recycled
commodities during the period of July to December, 2005, was $39,695.
• Ms. Plunkett- Latham asked about recycling collection in the parks. Ms. Wilmot
will follow -up.
a1)[01I1s150-MOng
Ms. Hays MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. Ms. Frey SECONDED. MOTION
CARRIED. 8:40 a.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Solvei Wilmot
Smirnof F Ice, Mike's provide f Idvored
'mdlterndtives' for summer drink
With summer fast approaching, people are always
looking for something cool and refreshing. Beer
has always been the old standby, but over the last
' Sri few years "malternative" beverages have taken a bite
out of beer sales.
The term "malternative" is a reduction of the phrase
malt alternative, and it implies that these drinks are meant to be an
alternative to that slightly more famous category of malt -based
beverages: beer. Malternatives have been a near -fad since the early
2001 release of Smirnoff Ice.
Wine coolers are now in the malternative category as they no
longer are made with wine. Wine is more expensive to use than
a malt -based process. Two of the more popular types of malt
beverages are Smirnoff Twisted with eight different flavors and
Mike's Hard Lemonade with six different flavors.
These products are crisp, clean and very refreshing, and lightly
carbonated with no lingering aftertaste like regular beer.
Give one a try this summer, you'll be surprised by how good
it tastes. i
By Steve Grausam, Liquor Operations Director
i
Tops with Tomko
^
Looking for a great hostess or
Voga Pinot Grigio, 750ml, a fast -
last- minute birthday gift? Give a
growing label in the world of
DaveTomko
memorable gift from Edina Liquor
Italian Pinot Grigio. The brand has
Assistant
with one of Dave Tomko's picks
captured a lot of attention with
Store Manager
for summer:
the signature bottle shaped like
Chalone Pinot Noir, 750 ml,
a giant shampoo or perfume
a solid Pinot at a very nice price,
bottle, $9.99
$14.99
Peels Blueberry Pomegranate,
Cline Viognier, 750 ml, loaded with
4 pack, blending dark blueberries
exotic melon, flower and spicy
with pomegranate is "smart and
notes, $10.99
sassy with a taste you won't
forget," $5.49
Ochoa Garnacha Rose, 750ml,
very deep color with firm tannins
Dave Tomko is Assistant Manager
and ripe, almost candied plum
of Edina Liquor - Southdale.
and cherry flavors, $10.99
L,ii
Blends, table wines are perfect for
summer picnics, gatherings
Summer is here! As Minnesotans, we can finally
get outside and enjoy our decks and patios. There
is nothing better than a day on the deck or on
the blanket in the grass with a chilled glass of
white wine.
What white wine should you choose for your
picnic or other outdoor gathering? What will
please your friends, neighbors and guests? Think
crisp, clean and easy to drink: white wines to
please the masses.
Two general crowd - pleasers are Pinot Grigio and
Sauvignon Blanc. However, there are many
new blends and table wines that are fun and
affordable!
Try blends such as Pine Ridge Chenin/ Viognier or
Cline Pinot Grigio /Chardonnay. Table white
blends include labels such as Whitetruck, Menage
a Trois White and Conundrum. All are excellent
and some come with a screw cap for easy outdoor
access.
Whatever your style or need, come in and see us.
We will be happy to recommend our favorites and
find the right wines to please you and your
guests. i
By Greg Keehr, Assistant Liquor Operations Director
and Manager of Edina Liquor - Grandview
f
M
0
✓.
EDINAS 'LIQUOR
6755 York Avenue South
Edina, MN 55435
www.EdinaLiquor.com
'iepads yluow- ayl- ;o -auim ayl io; pasn aq louue3 uodnoD j
vaA!6 aq pim siuno3sip jay11n; ou pue palda»e aq jpm sa!do:)oloyd ON '90-L£-L 01 90-LO-L PIIeA !
i
i
i
i
�ue18 uou6
-IAneS jo 0161,19 Iould Io ailloq al6uls a IIo %OZ
H0C1 I- It.VNIa3
aY
..--- - -.... --- - -- --- - -- - -- --- - - ---- ------ - - - --- --- - - - --- - - --- - --- --- - --- - - - - - - - -- - - a
'jepads yluow- aye- ;o -auim ay1 io; pasn aq ;ouueD uodno:) j
,uaA!6 aq ipm slunom!p iayljn; ou pue palda»e aq iym sa!do)oloyd ON 90-OE-9 019()- LO-9 PIIeA
•(AjaljeA Aue) apeuOwa3 paeH s,al!VY ao ail
Iloa!uiS Io a6eped aa6jel ao ped -xis a IIo %0 L
2i0C1ZSI1 ;.VNIa9
"yA
i
Steve Grausam
Liquor Operations Director
Red wines are good for barbeques
Warm weather and barbeques go
hand -in -hand. At this time of year,
customers are always asking, "What kind
of red wine should I bring to a barbeque ?"
In my opinion, the best red wines for a
barbeque are Red Zinfandel and Pinot Noir.
L SStr-8Z6 -Z L9
VZVSS NW 'eU1p3
;S gjOS M Et,6E
spun j of jxau — awea j I y30S
SSSb -8Z6 -Z L9
SE17SS NW'eUlp3
.S •any JJ0,k SSL9
spoo3 qnD 01 lxau - aleP41noS
99Str-8Z6 -Z L9
9EVSS NW 'eUIP3
•S •any uouaaA E LOS
spoo3 s Aaaar aeau - mampueaO
SNOUV301 £
Manager's Column
Pinot Noir is my other choice. It is a very
food - friendly wine that goes with red meat,
white meat and fish. Try a bottle of Estancia
Pinot with grilled salmon or Mark West
Pinot with grilled chicken. You will not be
disappointed. 4
A couple of Zins that you should try are Steve Grausam is Liquor Operations Director.
Ravenswood Vintners Blend and Cline Cali- He can be reached by sending an e -mail to
fornia Zinfandel. Both are great with sgrousam @ci.edina.mn.us.
ribs and burgers. They have great fruit
Flavors and a little pepper spice on the
finish and generally sell for under $10.
The following story was published on Thomson ONE:
- Asoux lls I P EiS RFLEA1141- 1 PurLZCATI4N5. I85uE I L AKA -1 _ EVawr PNarce
PRESS RELEASES
MEDIA RELEASE
For Immediate Release
April 28, 2004
"Government Should Not Direct the Practice of Medicine," Say Panel of
MN Physicians and Business Owners
(St. Paul, Minnesota) - To counter the support of the Minnesota Medical Association and the Minnesota Chamber of
Commerce for "best practices" health care legislation, Citizens' Council on Health Care (CCHC) brought together a
panel of 4 physicians and 3 business owners today to discuss the issue with the news media:
Dr. Paul Bearmon, MD
• Mel Brandl, owner, Printmaster
• Dr. Steve Brzica, MD
• Dr. Dale Hammerschmidt, MD
• Dr. Spencer Johnson, MD
• Harold Hamilton, owner, Micro Control Company
• William Wenmark, owner, Now Care Medical Centers
"Government Will Tell Doctors How to Practice Medicine" was the heading of a large display board that listed and
described government actions authorized by the House and Senate Health and Human Services Omnibus bills, HF 1681
and SF 1760:
• Impose Bias
• Collaborate with HMOs
• Practice Medicine
• Violate Privacy
• Coerce Doctors
• Control Doctors
• Penalize Non - Compliance
"If the proposed legislation becomes law, state government will be empowered to direct patient care -quite simply, to,
disease by disease, tell your doctors how to practice medicine," said Twila Brase, president of CCHC.
"The doctor - patient relationship will be done. The doctor - bureaucrat relationship will begin," said Dr. Steve Brzica, MD,
anesthesiologist at Fairview Southdale Hospital.
"If we're going to use a cookbook approach, perhaps we should computerize the process and eliminate doctors," said
Harold Hamilton, tongue -in- cheek. Hamilton, owner of Micro Control Company, noted that individual doctors do better
than bureaucracies in determining what is best for patients.
The Health and Human Services omnibus bills which contain the "best practices" proposal have passed both the House
and Senate and await conference committee action. The Governor signaled his support for the proposal in his State of
the State address, saying his administration will "force health care providers to use best practices."
"This is a dangerous proposal, yet there has been virtually no public debate about it. The public must be informed
about this proposal before the legislature requires their doctors to work for government first and patients second,"
For information on Thomson ONE go to www.thomson.com /financial
Edina Youth Sports
Task Force
Final Recommendation
Background
• The Youth Sports Task force was created in
response to residents concerns to address:
• Priority access to public facilities
• Determine the City's role and relationship as it
relates to these programs
• Mission of the Taskforce:
The mission of the Edina Youth Sports is to
define the roles and responsibilities of City
staff, Park Board and City Council as it
relates to Edina's independently
incorporated youth athletic associations.
Background cont.
■ Identify Issues and Concerns Cont...
• There are too many scheduled programs for kids and not enough
scheduled free time.
• Access to participation.
• There seems to be a need to educate the public on how athletic
associations function.
• What level of oversight and control should government have of youth
athletic associations?
• Do traveling team participants get more access to facilities?
• What are other communities doing regarding these issues?
• Is there an issue/serve the greater good
• How and why did the Taskforce get formed and under what criteria
were Taskforce members chosen?
Introduction
• Youth Sports are one Edina's greatest
community strengths
• Develop positive traits and life values in our
youth
• Teaches youth to abide by the rules, accept
winning an losing, and respect authority figures
• Research has shown that youth who
participate in sports perform better in school
and are less likely to partake in unhealthy
activities
Background cont.
■ Identify Issues and Concerns
■ On November 10, 2005 the task force invited
the public to state issues and concerns they
have regarding youth athletics
• Public concerns appear to be different than the Taskforce mission
statement.
• Is there a need for a youth spoor oversight board?
• What is an elite team?
• Public money - resource allocation to private teams vs. different
participant fees.
• What is the government's role in dealing with over scheduled youth
which results in a lack of family time?
Background Cont.
■ Identified Issues and Concerns Cont
• What oversight venues are currently in place?
• The biggest problem that should concern government is the current
lack of public facilities.
• What should be the role of the Park Board and City Council in
providing an appropriate number of facilities?
• What is the effect on a child when picking elite teams at a young
age?
• If the City is going to assume more control and oversight of youth
athletic associations, then the City should provide more structure in
the area of providing medical personnel at games, practices, and
tournaments.
Community Input
■ Public Hearing — General Public
■ December 8, 2005
■ Public Hearing — Athletic Associations
■ January 12, 2006
■ Public Testimony — Every Meeting
Core Values Cont.
3. We believe that the most important underlying mission for
every youth athletic association is to develop emotionally,
socially, and physically healthy children; and
4. We believe that youth sports programs conducted under the
right conditions are enormously beneficial for children; and
5. We recognize the need to ensure that Edina's youth athletic
association programs provide athletic programs that are safe,
positive, fun, physically and psychologically age - appropriate,
educational, teaches values and ethics, strengthens the
community, promotes competition without conflict, open to all
residents of all abilities and should not be denied an opportunity
to participate based on ability, offer a reasonable number of
events, and are administered by qualified volunteers; and
Core Values Cont.
9. We recognize the need to ensure that Edina's youth athletic
associations form and advertise a formal grievance process by
which residents are assured of an appropriate venue and process
to hear their grievances in a manner that is open, fair, and just;
and
The City of Edina in a meeting duly assembled and by the
authority thereof, recognize and encourage official
implementation of this Community Strategy to improve the
culture of youth sports for all participants.
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS day of
2006.
Signed:
Mayor of Edina
Recommendation
Adoption of "Youth Sports Core Values and Community
Strategy"
1. The City of Edina believes in the benefits and attraction of youth
sports as a means to teach the children of this community values and
skills that will be of benefit to them throughout life; and
2. We believe that Edina's youth athletic associations develop
fundamental internal and external assets for children by providing
opportunities to develop positive character traits and life values where
children can learn a multitude of important lessons and valuable
fundamentals, such as ethics, abiding by the rules, winning and losing
with grace, coping with success and failure, always trying to do your
best, respecting authority figures, learning about team work,
developing fundamental motor skills and sports specific knowledge;
and
Core Values Cont.
6. We believe that youth sports association league organizers and
administrators must be educated on how to provide a safe,
positive, and fun youth sports environment before being granted
access to public facilities; and
7. We believe volunteer coaches and parents must receive
orientation and education as to the individual roles and
responsibilities in our community's effort to raise the standards
of youth sports programs and that volunteer coaches and parents
be held accountable for their behaviors; and
8. We believe it is necessary and desirable to establish guidelines,
requirements and standards for youth sports associations
utilizing public facilities; and
Recommendation
YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION'S RELATIONSHIP WITH THE
EDINA PARK BOARD AND THE PARK AND RECREATION STAFF
(RELATIONSHIP DOCUMENT)
The mission of the Edina Park and Recreation Department is to do our
part in further developing, preserving, and maintaining the City of
Edina's parks, recreation programs, and resources as a premier and
comprehensive park and recreation department in the Twin Cities area.
This relationship document between the Edina Park and Recreation
Department, Park Board, and with each association, establishes a
common set of guidelines that are to be adopted by all athletic
associations. The intent of these guidelines is to ensure that
associations are mindful of the public's desire for positive and healthy
athletic experiences for children and families in our community.
Relationship Agreement Cont.
The "Youth Sports Core Values and Community Strategy,"
established by the Edna Park Board in cooperation with the Edina
Park and Recreation Department, is to be adopted by all
associations. The Community Strategy defines the City's core
values and philosophy in the delivery of the community's youth
sports programs.
1. Edna Park and Recreation Department will provide facilities and
fields for boys and girls at each age group within the association.
2. It is the City of Edina's view that the public is best served when
there is only one independently incorporated youth athletic
association per sport. The City of Edina also understands and
supports that in some cases the public and volunteers are best
served by having the traveling component of a particular sport
administered by its own independent youth athletic association.
Recommended Guidelines
The Edina Park Board expects that all associations follow these
minimal guidelines in the operation of their association:
1. All boys and girls have a fun, positive, safe, age- appropriate,
educational experience that is open to all residents of all abilities,
and receive equal opportunity to participate at whatever ability
level they may play.
2. Boys and girls build good sportsmanship and character; learn to
be a team member; learn to accept discipline; incorporate
psychological and physical health.
3. Boys and girls, at each level of play, will receive basic
fundamental and skill training in the sport in which they
participate.
Guidelines Cont.
8. The Park and Recreation Department mandates background checks
on all individuals 18 & older who sine as a coach, referee, and each
person serving on the Board of Directors in any association. It is our
intent to protect our children, families and the associations.
9. To ensure that the public has an open, fair and just process to
handle grievances that are not resolved at the association board or
staff level, the City of Edina will facilitate a grievance process. (See
Appendix 1.1) This grievance process is not intended to deal with
team assignment, coach assignment or tryout process grievances.
10. The Edina Park and Recreation Department shall establish
minimum insurance requirements of each and every association that
uses Edna's public athletic facilities. This insurance shall provide for
the protection of volunteers, associations, and the City of Edina.
(referred to insurance consultant)
Relationship Agreement Cont.
3. The Edina Park and Recreation Department in
cooperation with the Park Board will help each
association plan, and provide safe and well'maintained
public athletic facilities to meet the youth sports
programs, and give professional staff liaison services
regarding the operation of their association, and offer
appropriate clerical and administrative support services.
4. The Edina Park and Recreation Department shall act as a
liaison between the associations and the Edina Park
Board to assist associations in providing a well rounded
and equitable program for all participants.
Guidelines Cont.
4. Associations manage team schedules and provide equitable
playing time for each level of competition within the age group.
5. Associations shall have a common code of conduct for players,
coaches and parents.
6. Qualified citizen volunteers should serve in positions as Board
of Directors. Board of Directors must have knowledge of the
program /sport Associations are encouraged to have open
member elections to elect Board of Directors.
7. Edina Park and Recreation Department personnel shall attend at
least semi - annually association board meetings. Department
personnel shall be available and provide resource help to
associations in training of coaches, operations, and other
functions with which the association needs assistance.
Guidelines Cont.
11. The Edina Park Board and Park and Recreation
Department shall provide and review annually guidelines to
be followed by all associations and users of facilities and
gymnasiums in our community as to the priority use of the
Edina School District's gymnasiums and facilities, and the
Edina community practice and game facilities. This is to
assure a fair allocation of gymnasiums and facilities use for
all participants, at all levels.
3
Guidelines Cont.
It is imperative that all associations, coaches, board
members, volunteers and parents understand and appreciate
the positive experience that is desired for all participants in
Edina youth sports. Therefore, the Edina Park and
Recreation Department and Park Board mandate that all
new parents, volunteers, coaches, board members, etc., who
participate in associations must read, understand and sign a
copy of the relationship agreement and Core Values and
Community Strategy. Signed copies of these documents
will be kept on file with the association.
Grievance Process cont.
The Ad -Hoc Grievance Committee will be made up of three
association presidents who are not president of the association
in question, plus two Park Board members. Those five
individuals will hear the complaint and make
recommendations to solve the grievance matter. If the Ad-
Hoc Grievance Committee's recommendations do not satisfy
the parties involved then the grievance will be referred to the
Park Board for a final decision.
The Ad -Hoc Grievance Committee will be formed only on an
as needed basis to deal with issues on a case by case basis.
Grievance Process cont.
Step #3: If the issue is unresolved at the staff level, then staff will
assemble the Ad -Hoc Grievance Committee to hear the complaint
With staff assistance and input from the parties involved, the Ad-
Hoc Grievance Committee will hear the complaint and make
recommendations.
It will be the Ad -Hoc Grievance Committee's duty to determine
whether or not the association has acted in a manner that is
contrary to the City's philosophy and core values; and if so, make
recommendations to correct the situation. It will not be the Ad-
Hoc Grievance Committee's duty to micro-manage program
decisions of Edina's youth athletic associations.
Grievance Process
The City of Edina demands that each youth athletic
association must have in place a well-documented and
publicized grievance process by which residents are assured
of an appropriate venue and process to hear their grievances
in a manner that is open, fair, and just. If the youth athletic
association board grievance process does not resolve the
issue, then the matter will be referred to Park and Recreation
Department staff. If staff is unable to resolve the issue, the
matter should then be referred to the Ad -Hoc Grievance
Committee.
Grievance Process cont.
The following escalation shall be followed:
Step # 1: Follow the written grievance procedure as established and
publicized for each youth athletic association.
Step #2: If, in the complainant's view, the issue was not resolved in
Step # 1, then the complainant should contact Park and
Recreation Department staff, who will do the following:
A. Evaluate the complaint.
B. Determine and judge whether or not the issue can or should
be resolved through diplomacy. If so, staff will facilitate a
problem - solving process at the staff level with the appropriate
community members and volunteers involved.
Grievance Process cont.
Step #4: If the parties involved are still not satisfied with the Ad -Hoc
Grievance Committee's recommendations, the final step is to refer
the matter to the Park Board for a final decision.
Both parties must abide by the Park Board's decision or they could
face sanctions.
4