Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-07-18_COUNCIL MEETINGAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL JULY 18, 2006 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its ngrmal sequence on the Agenda. * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of July 5, 2006 * II. CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID - As per pre -list dated July 12, 2006, TOTAL $ 6,243.11. III. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of July 5, 2006 and Special Meeting of July 5, 2006 II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Zoning Ordinances: First Reading requires affirmative rollcall votes of three Council members except that a rezoning from residential to non - residential requires four affirmative votes. Second Reading requires affirmative rollcall votes of three of Council to pass except rezoning from residential to non - residential requires four affirmative votes. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall votes of four members of Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council members required passing. Conditional Use Permit: Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council members required to pass. Variance Appeal: Favorable rollcall of Council Members present to uphold or deny appeal Rollcall A. PUBLIC HEARING FINAL REZONING, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, Edina Gateway, LLC, 4930 West 77th Street call B. PUBLIC HEARING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, St. Patrick's Catholic Church, 6820 St. Patrick's Lane Agenda /Edina City Council July 18, 2006 Page 2 III. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS IV. AWARD OF BID A. Courtney Field Shelter Building and Baseball Field V. REPORTS/ RECOMMENDATIONS A. Resolution No. 2006 -72 Accepting Various Donations B. SET HEARING DATE (8/1/06) New Intoxicating Liquor License, Edina Grill C. Bikeway Task Force Report D. Above Ground Swimming Pool Report E. Traffic Safety of July 6, 2006 F. North East Edina Traffic Study VI. FINANCE A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per Pre -List dated July 6, 2006, TOTAL: $600,702.56, and July 12, 2006, TOTAL: $517,351.19. VII. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS VIII. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES IX. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL X. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEM Tues Aug 1 Tues Aug 1 Tues Aug 15 Tues Aug 29 Mon Sept 4 Tues Sept 5 Tues Sept 12 Tues Sept. 12 Tues Sept 19 Tues Oct 3 Tues Oct 17 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS Budget Hearing 5:00 P.M. Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Filing Opens - City Council Offices 8:00 A.M. LABOR DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Offices Closed Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. FILING CLOSES City Council Office 5:00 P.M. PRIMARY ELECTION DAY - Polls Open From 7:00 A.M. until 8:00 P.M. Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS CITY CLERK'S OFFICE COUNCIL CHAMP CITY CLERK'S OFI�. COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL JULY 5, 2006 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Housh, Hulbert, Masica, and Chair Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Housh and seconded by Commissioner Hulbert approving the Consent Agenda for the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR JUNE 20, 2006, APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Housh and seconded by Commissioner Hulbert approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for June 20, 2006, as presented. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda, Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned. Executive Director R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # 13953 711312006 100668 URS CORPORATION 6,243.11 CENT LAKES PATH/TRANSIT SYS 6,243.11 6,243.11 Grand Total CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/13/2006 — 7/13/2006 Doc No Inv No Account No 140118 2360696 9132.6103 Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 6,243.11 Total Payments 6,243.11 7/12/2006 10:17:33 Page- 1 - Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKE TAX DISTRICT R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/12/2006 10:17:36 Council Check Summary Page - 1 7/13/2006 - 7/13/2006 Company 09000 HRA FUND Amount 6,243.11 Report Totals 6,243.11 We confirm to the best of our knOlWedse and belief, that these claims comply in all material respeCts with the requirements of the City Of Edina purchasing pglicles and MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JULY 5, 2006 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Housh, Hulbert, Masica, and Mayor Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Hulbert approving the Council Consent Agenda as presented with the exception of Agenda Item I. Approval of Minutes of the Regular Meeting of June 20, 2006, for a correction and Agenda Item II.A.2, Conditional Use Permit, St. Patrick's Church, 6820 St. Patrick's Lane, and Agenda Item V.D. Amend Existing Emergency Preparedness Contract with Bloomington. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -69 OF APPRECIATION ACCEPTING DAVID BYRON FAMILY DONATION Mayor Hovland welcomed and thanked the Byron family members for the contribution given in David's memory to the Edina Fire Department. He noted David's unselfish, dedicated service as a volunteer in the City of Edina and that the donations would be used by the Fire Department for the purchase of a thermal imaging camera. Mayor Hovland and.the Council, in joint acclimation, introduced and moved adoption of the following Resolution of Appreciation: RESOLUTION NO. 2006-69 RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION Whereas, David Byron served his fellow citizens on the City of Edina's Planning Commission since his appointment in 1990 and was the Chair at the time of his death on February 14, 2006; and Whereas, David Byron gave generously of his time and talent to enhance the quality of life in Edina; and Whereas, David Byron's skill and intellect served to guide sound decisions on the use of land in Edina, and Whereas, the David Byron Family decided to dedicate all memorials in David's honor to the Edina Fire Department, and Whereas, the Edina Fire Department will use the David Byron Memorials to purchase a thermal imaging camera to reduce the prospect of death or injuries to victims of fires and firefighters. Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved that the Edina City Council does hereby express its appreciation on behalf of all Edina citizens to the DAVID BYRON FAMILY for his unselfish and dedicated service as a volunteer in the City of Edina and their generous gift to the Edina Fire Department of a thermal imaging camera; and Be It Further Resolved, that this resolution be entered in the minutes of the Edina City Council and that an appropriate copy be presented to his family. Adopted this 5th day of July 2006. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Hovland Motion carried. Page 1 Minutes/Edina City Council/iuly 5, 2006 1. RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -74 OF APPRECIATION ACCEPTING EDINA GARDEN COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION DONATION Mayor Hovland thanked the Edina Garden Council and the Community Foundation for the donation of the fountain at Arneson Acres Park. Director Keprios thanked the Garden Council and especially Dianne Plunkett Latham for spearheading the effort, Sue Neuhart, President of the Garden Council and Dick Crockett, Director of the Community Foundation. Member Masica introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2006-74 WHEREAS, the Edina Garden Council has presented flower shows and garden tours, planted public flower beds, educated the public and joined in civic events for the betterment of Edina for 53 years; and WHEREAS, the Edina Garden Council has worked closely with the City of Edina and been generous in its support to municipal programs and facilities, donating such things as a gazebo and fountain at Arneson Acres Park, and WHEREAS, the Edina Garden Council determined that the 1998 fountain at Arneson Acres Park should be replaced and worked with the Edina Community Foundation to raise $51,138 for a new structure, and WHEREAS, the new classical three -tiered fountain has been installed in a 20 -foot reinforced concrete pool and will be more durable and tamper- resistant than the old structure; and WHEREAS, the fountain will be dedicated 10 A.m. Saturday, Aug. 5, during the Edina Garden Council's biennial garden tour. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council, City staff and all Edina residents hereby express their thanks and appreciation to the EDINA GARDEN COUNCIL & EDINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION for their work to beautify and improve Arneson Acres Park and the City of Edina. Dated this 5th day of July 2006. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF TUNE 20, 2006, APPROVED Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Hulbert approving the Minutes of the Special Council Meeting of June 20, 2006, as presented. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL FOR TUNE 20, 2006, APPROVED AS CORRECTED Member Masica asked that the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina City Council for June 20, 2006, be removed from the Consent Agenda for a spelling correction. Member Masica made a motion approving the Minutes of the Edina City Council for June 20, 2006, as corrected. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Hovland Motion carried. Page 2 Minutes/Edina Citv Council/luly 5.2006 *HEARING DATE SET OF JULY 18, 2006, FOR PLANNING MATTERS Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Hulbert approving setting a hearing date of July 18, 2006, for a planning matter, as follows: 1. Final Rezoning, Conditional Use Permit, Final Development Plan and Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, Edina Gateway, LLC, 4930 West 77th Street. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. HEARING DATE SET OF JULY 18, 2006, FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ST. PATRICK'S CATHOLIC CHURCH (6820 ST. PATRICK'S LANE) Member Masica asked that the hearing date of July 18, 2006, for Conditional Use Permit for St. Patrick's Catholic Church at 6820 St. Patrick's Lane, be removed from the Consent Agenda for additional information. She inquired about the size, makeup and placement of the sign for the Conditional Use Permit and asked if homemade signs were permitted. Manager Hughes said the City has specifications for signage and historically pigns have been done professionally. Mr. Hughes said the City requested St. Patrick's signs be removed and replaced with conforming signage prior to the hearing. Member Masica asked if the specifications state where the signs must be placed on the site. Mr. Hughes elaborated that "one sign was required for each street front with a specific setback requirement. Member Masica made a motion setting the hearing date of July 18, 2006, for Conditional Use Permit for St. Patrick's Catholic Church at 6820 St. Patrick's Lane. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Hovland Motion carried. -- CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS Flora Delaney, 5916 Bernard Place, reported she received a letter dated June 30, 2006, from the City Health Department stating she was in violation of the City Ordinance 450.01 prohibiting above - ground swimming pools with a water depth of over 24 inches. Ms. Delaney stated after researching the issue, surrounding cities regulations allow above - ground pools such as she has in her yard. She stated she felt it important to allow her children an active summer activity. Ms. Delaney argued that with today's changed technology, an above - ground pool should be allowed. She suggested Edina study its existing Ordinance for above - ground pools. Ms. Delaney also asked to be allowed to leave her pool in place until after the Council reviewed the ordinance. ' Mr. Hughes said a report could be back before the Council by the July 18, 2006, regular meeting. The Council denied Ms. Delaney's request to keep the pool in place. The Council suggested review of the existing Ordinance include a comparison of the existing policy of surrounding communities. *AWARD OF BID FOR MILLING MACHINE AND PAVER WITH OPERATORS - MILL AND OVERLAY PROJECTS - PUBLIC WORKS Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Hulbert for award of bid for a milling machine and paver with operators for mill and overlay projects for Public Works to recommended low bidder Bituminous Roadways, Inc., at $24,721.17. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. Page 3 Minutes/Edina City Council/luly 5, 2006 *AWARD OF BID FOR TREATED SALT FOR SNOW AND ICE CONTROL Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Hulbert for award of bid for treated salt for snow and ice control to sole bidder, Cargill, Inc., under State Contract #436254 at $60.65 per ton delivered. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *AWARD OF BID FOR SINGLE AXLE TRUCK CHASSIS - STREET DEPARTMENT Motion made ,by Member Housh and seconded by Member Hulbert for award of bid for one single axle truck chassis for the Street Department Unit No. 25.309, to recommended sole bidder Boyer Trucks, Inc., under State Contract #435523, at $62,745.54. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *AWARD OF BID FOR TRALEE WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -458 Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Hulbert for award of bid for Tralee Water Main Improvement No. WM -458 to recommended low bidder, Castrejon, Inc., at $31,800.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. EDINA'S COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT (CAFR) FOR YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2005, RECEIVED Director Wallin introduced James Eichten, CPA, partner with Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Company, (MMKR) the City's Audit firm. Mr. Eichten briefly informed the Council of the unqualified opinion his firm had given the City of Edina in completing their Comprehensive Annual Financial Statement for the year ending December 31, 2005. He further explained that the Auditor's role in completing the Annual Report was an opinion on assuring the Financial Statements were fairly presented in accordance with the GAAP. Mr. Eichten elaborated that the testing of internal controls and compliance included: Financial Statement Audit; Schedule of Federal Awards; and State Statutes. Mr. Eichten complimented staff on their audit preparations and their precise internal control policies, financial records and procedures. He summarized the process and gave projections for the future: • Clean Opinion on Financial Statement • Clean Opinion on Schedule of Federal Awards • No Findings on Compliance with State Laws • Continue to Improve Internal Controls • Financial Results Indicate Adherence to Budget • Excellent Financial Condition and • Continue Ongoing Assessment of Financial Projections and Results Mr. Eichten thanked the Council for the time to review the report and commended the City for obtaining an unqualified result of their 2005 CAFR. Member Housh made a motion accepting Edina's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for Year Ending December 31, 2005, as presented. Member Hulbert seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Hovland Motion carried. Page 4 Minutes/Edina City Council/July 5, 2006 RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -71 - ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained in order to comply with State Statues, all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Masica introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2006-71 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Donations to the Braemar Memorial Fund for future Golf Course equipment purchases: Duane Blake $50.00 State Farm Companies $500.00 D W Steinkamp $30.00 Ivan Roberson $30.00 Daniel Geske $15.00 Midwest Investment Advisors $15.00 Donations to the Edina Art Center: Sarah M. Hall $200.00 Gene F. Gaines $10.00 John A. Telfer, Misc. art supplies $75.00 Sarah Delaney, Collector pots $1,360.00 Donation to Edina Senior Center: Edina Community Foundation $2,274.90 Defibrillator including supplies And Mounting Case Dated: July 5, 2006. Member Hulbert seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -70 - APPROVING GOVERNOR'S "FIT CITY" PROGRAM FOR EDINA Tolu Oyelowo, Community Health Committee Chair, indicated the purpose of the Governor's "Fit City" Program would be recognizing Minnesota cities committed to creating and maintaining an environment supportive of active living. Any city could be designated a "Fit City" that encouraged its residents to be more physically active. Cities that were designated as a Governor's "Fit City" will receive a recognition plaque to be displayed within.the city. Required criteria: • Adopt a resolution affirming activity- friendly commitments by City leaders and elected officials • Agree to advertise and display "Fit City" designation Optional criteria: • Worksite wellness policy for city employees .Page 5 Minutes/Edina City Council/Tuly 5, 2006 • Capacity -to measure and report change in physical activity awareness to maintain "Fit City" designation • Maintain/ develop walkability capacity and locations accessible for walking • Maintain/ develop one accessible indoor facility, public or private for indoor activities • Maintain/ develop recreation areas, parks, playgrounds and playfields • Partner with community -wide organizations dedicated to activities that support physical activity • Promote/ sponsor annual event/ activity as commitment to fitness • Commit to building community awareness about locations, services and organizations dedicated to fitness/ physical activity. Member Hulbert introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2006-70 AFFIRMING ACTIVITY - FRIENDLY COMMITMENTS WHEREAS, the first criteria listed on the Governor's "Fit City" Application is stated as: Criteria 1 (required). City must adopt a Resolution affirming fit - friendly commitments by community leaders and elected officials. WHEREAS, Active Living is a way of life that integrates physical activity into daily routines. The goal is to accumulate at least 30 minutes of activity each day. Individuals may do this in a variety of ways such as walking or bicycling for transportation, exercise or pleasure; playing in the park; working in the yard; taking the stairs; and using recreation facilities; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina has adopted a tobacco -free policy because we believe that tobacco use in park areas is detrimental to the health of everyone using the park system and that creating a tobacco -free recreational environment supports the purpose of our park system, which is to promote health and wellness. WHEREAS, the City of Edina affirms activity- friendly commitments such as: Adopt a Resolution to designate the City of Edina as a Governor's "Fit City". Agree to advertise and display "Fit City" designation in the form of a plaque. City maintains and develops walkability capacity and locations that are easily accessed by residents, workers and visitors. City commits to maintain and develop. recreation areas, parks, playgrounds and play fields. City commits to maintain at least one indoor facility - public or private - available for cold season activity that is open and accessible to all ages. Supports recreation programs that encourage active living. City partners with community-wide organizations dedicated to specific or general activities which support physical activity. City promotes or sponsors at least one event or activity as part of the city's annual commitment to fitness. City commits to building community awareness about locations, services, and organizations dedicated to fitness /physical activity NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Edina is committed to providing an activity- friendly community to its residents. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby authorizes the application for The Governor's "Fit City" Program. Member Masica seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Hovland Motion carried. Page 6 Minutes/Edina City Council/iuly 5, 2006 EXISTING EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS CONTRACT WITH BLOOMINGTON AMENDED Member Hulbert asked that the existing emergency preparedness contract with Bloomington amendment be removed from the Consent Agenda for further information. She inquired what preparedness has been accomplished and who was monitoring the expenditure of funding. Sanitarian Engelman explained prior to her working at the City of Edina, an emergency preparedness coordinator for public health was hired in ,conjunction with Bloomington and Richfield. Ms. Hulbert asked what the funds were used for. Ms. Engelman said funds were used for planning activities regarding emergency preparedness and she suggested inviting that person to give a presentation before the Council at some point in the future. Ms. Engelman gave a brief history of the planning that has been and will be undertaken for preparedness in Edina. She reminded the Council that updates would be provided in the Council packets on a regular basis. Mr. Hughes suggested additional information could be shared with the Council at a regular meeting in August keeping in mind that staying abreast of information with the State would be of paramount importance. Following a Council discussion, Member Hulbert made a motion approving the amendment to the 2006 Public Health Preparedness Agreement with the City of Bloomington for an additional $12,758.00 including $8,758.00 for additional Cities Readiness Initiative (CRI) and $4,000.00 for Pandemic Flu. Member Masica seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Hovland Motion carried. TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REPORT FOR TUNE 8, 2006, CONTINUED FROM TUNE 20, 2006, APPROVED Mr. Hughes explained that the Traffic Safety Staff Report for June 8, 2006, was continued from the June 20, 2006, regular Council meeting. Steve Lillehaug, Assistant City Engineer, recommended a single motion of approval for Section A. 1, 3, and 4, Section B. 1 and Section C. Member Housh made a motion approving the Traffic Safety Staff Report for June 8, 2006, Section A., 1, 3 and 4, Section B.1 and Section C as presented. Member Hulbert seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Hovland Motion carried. Mr. Lillehaug indicated that the Traffic Safety Committee recommended in Section A.2, that NO PARKING ANYTIME signs be erected on the north /west side of School Road from the Concord School parking lot west and south to West 60th Street. He elaborated that a request was received from the Fire Marshal stating it was extremely difficult for emergency vehicles to navigate and operate along School Road during school events due to the narrow width when vehicles park on both sides of the roadway. Mr. Lillehaug stated School Road was 24 feet wide with curb / gutter and no sidewalks. No vehicle or pedestrian accidents have been reported in the past five years. Currently, the parking restrictions in place were, "No PARKING ANYTIME" signs on the north side of School Road from Concord running west to the parking lot of Concord School. "NO PARKING SCHOOL DAYS" on the south side of School Road from Concord Avenue running west to 4729 School Road. Parking currently was allowed on both sides of the street west of the Page 7 Minutes/Edina City Council/iuly 5, 2006 parking lot and south to West 60th Street. The Fire Marshal was requesting continuing the "NO PARKING ANYTIME" restrictions on School Road, on the north /west side only, from the Concord School parking lot west and south around the curve to West 60th Street to make the street more accessible to emergency vehicles. Mr. Lillehaug said when the Committee considers parking restrictions, a balance of safety and inconvenience was examined as well as alternatives to parking. The alternative would be to allow parking on the opposite side of the street. The Committee was asking the Council to consider approving this recommendation. Karen Miller, 4804 School Road, and Lila Larson, 4800 School Road, speaking for the neighborhood said that the recommendation seemed aggressive because the school was empty for three months. She noted that a problem with parking existed sporadically. Ms. Miller said the problem seemed to be parking on the curve going east /west to the north. Ms. Larson asked that the signs not be installed so visitors to the neighborhood would have a place to park. Member Masica asked for clarification of what the neighborhood wanted. Ms. Miller restated their fear that NO PARKING ANYTIME signs would keep visitors from parking in their neighborhood all year long. Ms. Miller said while she understands the concern of the Fire Marshal, she suggested just signing the turn. Mr. Lillehaug again said a balance must be found and the neighborhood suggestion might be that balance. He suggested the Council refer the issue back to the Traffic Safety Committee for further study. Chief Scheerer indicated putting NO PARKING signs on the north side of the curve where the road narrows down to 24 feet would be a good balance for emergency purposes and the neighborhood. Member Masica made a motion referring Section A.2., recommending NO PARKING ANYTIME signs placed on the northwest side of School Road from the Concord School parking lot west and south to West 60th Street back to the Traffic Safety Committee for further consideration of placing NO PARKING signs on the north side of the curve where the road narrows to 24 feet in width. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Hovland Motion carried. BIKE TASK FORCE FORMATION CONSIDERED Mayor Hovland said at the June 20, 2006, meeting, the Council asked this matter be placed on the July 5, 2006, Agenda for discussion. Mr. Hughes said the Council may choose how they wish the flow of information to happen, whether it be establishing an appointed Task Force that would report back to the Council or a sub -set of the Transportation Commission. Steve Rusk, 5040 Hankerson Avenue, asked what the purpose of the Bikeway Task Force was and would it be just for the Interlachen /Blake Trail or included in the Comprehensive Plan. He suggested formation of a Task Force that would report directly to the Council initially and could Page 8 Minutes/Edina City Counciouly 5, 2006 be then be tied more with the Traffic Commission. Mr. Rusk added the first thing the Task Force should work on would be the Blake /Interlachen Trail to assure funding would remain in place. Member Masica said it appeared that. Mr. Rusk had done an inordinate amount of thinking and planning about formation of a Task Force and she inquired if he would Chair the Bikeway Task Force. Leanne Gustafson, 1 Cooper Avenue, said she wanted to read something to the Council that would give validity for formation of a Task Force. She said the following persons agreed with a Blake /Interlachen bike trail with 67 crossings the design was unsafe: Bill Carlson - Three Rivers Park District; Dell Miller - Intergovernmental Relations Administrator; Jim Dustrud - MnDOT; and Darryl Anderson, Mary Elizabeth Jackson, Steve Clark - Transit for Livable Communities. Gene Persha, 6917 Cornelia Drive, spoke to the memo he furnished to the Council. He encouraged the Council to allow interested bicyclists input before the bikeway path plans were drawn up. Mr. Persha reiterated that he would not favor the Task Force being a part of the Transportation Commission. He suggested the Task Force be made up of broad -based citizen participation to determine the direction they want to pursue. Mayor Hovland suggested formation of a Bikeway Task Force appointed by the Council to develop a comprehensive bike plan for the City, assisted by staff. In the future a bikeway advisory group could function as a part of the Transportation Commission. Member Housh indicated interested residents could apply to serve on the Task Force and added time was of the essence to assure funds remained available. Member Masica said she liked the list of residents proposed by , Mr. Rusk and suggested representatives of each quadrant of the City be included on the Task Force. Mayor Hovland said chances of acquiring a representative from MnDOT or from Transit for Livable Communities to serve on a Task Force would be a remote possibility. Mr. Rusk added the experts would only work with the Task Force on an advisory capacity. Mr. Hughes reiterated his concern with staff involvement in the process and suggested staff bring to the next Council meeting a recommendation of a possible consultant. Following a Council discussion, Member Hulbert made a motion approving establishing a Bikeway Task Force, Chaired by Steve Rusk to serve at the pleasure of the Council and to accomplish a Comprehensive Bicycle Plan, and to consist of interested members who may apply to serve. Mr. Rusk's report to be reviewed by Council on July 18, 2006, with the mission and membership process. Member Masica seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Hovland Motion carried. *RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -73 AUTHORIZING SIGNAL AGREEMENT WITH MnDOT - WEST 70TH STREET AND HIGHWAY 100 Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Hulbert approving the following resolution: RESOLUTION NO.2006 -73 AUTHORIZING SIGNAL AGREEMENT WITH MNDOT FOR Page 9 Minutes/Edina City Council/iuly 5, 2006 WEST 70TH STREET AND HIGHWAY 100 WHEREAS, the City of Edina entered into an agreement with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes, to wit: To remove the existing Traffic Control Signals. and install new Traffic Control Signals with Street Lights, Emergency Vehicle Pre - emption and Signing on Trunk Highway No. 100 at .70th Street, West and East Ramps; install a new Traffic Control Signal with Street Lights, Emergency Vehicle Pre- emption and Signing on 701h Street at Metro Boulevard; and install Interconnect on 701h Street from Trunk Highway No. 100 West Ramps to Metro Boulevard; in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth and contained in Agreement No. 89628R, a copy of which was before the, Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the proper City officers be and hereby are authorized to execute such agreement and any amendments, and thereby assume for and on behalf of the City all of the contractual obligations contained therein. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Member Housh made a motion and Member Hulbert seconded the motion approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated June 21, 2006, and consisting of .32 pages: General Fund $65,962.32; Communications Fund' $11,369.82; Working Capital Fund $77,954.95; Construction Fund $61,923.94; Art Center Fund $793.25; Aquatic Center Fund $6,577.07; Golf Course..Fund $65,561.07; Ice Arena Fund $1,916.91; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $8,738.25; Liquor Fund $197,705.99; Utility Fund $1,006,946.97; Storm Sewer Fund $71,422.81; PSTF Fund $668.57; TOTAL $1,577,541.92; and for approval of payment of claims dated June 28, 2006„ and consisting of 36 pages: General Fund $271,765.30; Communications Fund $23,895.35; Working Capital Fund $39,929.89; Construction Fund $927.00; Art Center Fund $21,212.06; Golf Dome Fund $1,818.53; Aquatic Center Fund $24,171.00; Golf Course Fund $39,120.43, Ice Arena Fund $1,321.00; Edinborough/ Centennial Lakes Fund $4,755.36; Liquor Fund $163,145.25; Utility Fund $28,971.13; Storm Sewer Fund $2,410.87, PSTF Agency Fund $917.45; TOTAL $624,360.62. Motion carried on rollcall vote four ayes. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 9:55 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Page 10 City Clerk ' MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT EDINA FIRE STATION #1 JULY 5, 2006 5:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Housh, Hulbert, Masica, and Mayor Hovland. Mayor Hovland said the purpose of the special work session was to tour the Edina Fire Station and receive information about potential remodeling of the Station. Following a tour of the Station, Gary Hay, Architect said Station #1 was located ideally within the City of Edina because of its proximity to Highway 62. However, the Station was built in 1972 and was designed to serve a department that answered fire calls. He pointed out the Edina Fire Department has developed an emergency medical service that responds to numerous calls daily. Mr. Hay explained 70% of calls received by the Fire Department were actually EMS calls where someone was actually transported for service. He continued stating that of the remaining calls 30% were for fires and but only. 30% of the fire calls were real incidents, with the remaining being false alarms not needing service. Mr. Hay said there were many deficiencies in the existing station for medical response teams. He pointed out the fire fighting work force has changed over time and Edina has just hired their first woman paramedic/ firefighter. The living spaces need to be remodeled to accommodate female paramedic/ firefighters. Mr. Hay presented his proposal for Fire Station #1. He showed a comparison of the existing areas and a proposed remodeling of the station within the existing structure, and a partial demolition/ rebuild of the station. Mr. Hay also presented some preliminary program adjacencies of each alternative. The Council discussed with Mr. Hay, Chief Scheerer and Manager Hughes the various components which should be addressed in any remodeling of the fire station. They discussed the challenges of modeling, partial demolition/ reconstruction and a total demolition reconstruction, financing of any project, and the time line that would be followed. Consensus was that Mr. Hay should continue working on a concept design to be brought before Council at a regular meeting. Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra Mangen, City Clerk d e �yo less REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item: II. A. From: Dan Cornejo Consent ❑ Interim City Planner Information Only ❑ Date: July 18, 2006 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Action: ❑ Motion Final Rezoning, Final Dev Plan ® Resolution Conditional Use Permit, and ❑ Ordinance Amendment to the Comp Plan ❑ Discussion Edina Gateway, LLC, 4930 77 Recommendation: At their June 28, 2006, Planning Commission meeting the Planning Commission recommended Final Rezoning, Conditional Use Permit, Final Development Plan, and Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan approval for Edina Gateway, LLC, 4930 77th Street West subject to: 1. Setback variances from Highway 100 and West 77th Street, with final site plan adjustments regarding parking space sizes subject to approval by Planning and Engineering Departments. 2. Proof of Parking Variance. 3. Non drive - through facility. 4. Watershed District permits. 5. Affordable Housing participation. 6. Intersection and signal operational analysis to be conducted by Applicant and submitted to the Transportation Commission for review; and 7. Installation of a 10 foot high fence, including gate along the northerly boundary line between subject site and residential neighbors. Info /Background: See attached Staff Report, Meeting Minutes and correspondence. !► LOCATION MAP Legend i ® FSghighled Feahae m ,. Sbeel Nana Labels Mmicpal8oundary f E BWdng_Footp" �p2 C ks SEOUId LN .p Lakes - - - ppacks pPawels m S < 8 a � rrmsTw �w� �EIT EDINA GATEWAY, LLC PID:3102824330009 4930 77th St W Edina, MN 55435 i PC MINUTED JUNE 28, 2006 – Z -06 -1 Final Rezoning Conditional Use Permit Final Development Plan,and Amendment to the Comprehensivoolaw",\ Edina Gateway, LLC 1 493077 th Street West Mr. Cornejo informed the Commission tlie.�City Council at their _lay 2,\ 2006, meeting granted First Reading to 0 d na ce No. 8564- -29, Le Preliminary Rezoning approval. At this time the proponents OmittiriJ,for Final Rezoning, Conditional Use Permit, Final Development Plan and Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan approval. Mr. Cornejo presented his staff rep�rf.`) Mr. Cornejo concluded staff r commen/ s ppraval o f • Final Rezoning from Planned Office District..(P�OU 1) to Planned Commercial District,(PCD�2) • Final Development Plan, hated June t;2006; subject to revisions to parking provision\ \ • Amendment to the C6mpreheihsive Plan, changing the designation of 4,00 77th Street'West ir6"ffice -to Commercial; and e \ Bondi ional_Use Permit for res`ident6t dwelling units above the principal \ us , subject to he foll6�ving conk jons: Setback variances from Highway 100 and West 77th Street, with final site plan adjustments regarding parking space sizes subject to \ approval by Planning and Engineering Departments Drnnfff D�rlrinn1v�riinnrro 3. NQ drive- throLfgh facility. 4. Waie`hed Distrip6permits. 5. Affordable housing participation. 6. Intemection.�arid signal operational analysis to be conducted by the Applicant and submitted to the Transportation Commission for review. And subject to the erection of a 10 foot high fence and additional landscaping along the northerly property line to include a pass- through gate for the neighbors. Mr. James Nelson was present representing the owners of Pentagon Office Park. Mr. Paul May, Craig Powell and Ben Halberg were also present representing Pentagon property owners. Commissioner Workinger asked for clarification on the proposed fence. Mr. Cornejo pointed out the plans indicate an 8 foot fence; however after the applicant met with adjoining residential neighbors the installation of a fence 10 feet in height appeared to be the best solution. Commissioner Grabiel asked how the is handled. Mr. Cornejo responded it would contract. Commissioner Staunton asked if the Coi land. Mr. Cornejo responded in the affirmative. ale - housing unit component pa of the development A else Permit duns with the Commissioner Staunton inquired if the required variant also need to go before the Zoning Board,. Cornejo respoA variances are tied to the total project and would not�o, before for a separate hearing. \ Mr. James Nelson, and explained Pentagon located in the Twin Cities location and buildings wei remains "Class A ", but the Nelson said the goal of th site. Mr. Nelson -said in rE Edina. Mr: Nelson added on this,aite one sea pousrng wm "a a ding at this tin ed 240 -500+ thou tnelrship with the I Concluding, Mr: along the ,northc the project Oroval of the mina Board 7790 Loch' lard, Terrace, addressed the Commission )fficefPark of(the first '`oft ce parks" to be area. Mr�Nelson sai&at_the time of construction the e,c%nsidered "Class A" but after 45 years the location office buildings area-"Class C. Continuing, Mr. l proposal is to redevelop and renovate this 2.1 acre itxthis sate. is the "gateway" entrance into this part of in this�prea there are missing land uses, and in reality all live where th \ey work. Mr. Nelson explained the of - ale and will be located above one floor of retail he believes the prince points for the units will be rld doliars. Mr. Nelson said this project is very proud of st;Edino Housing Foundation and through their 2nd b)e units will be available for qualified buyers. yid they also have no problem installing a 10 foot fence ty boundary. Mr. May addressedAhe Commission and with graphics pointed out features of the proposed, redevelopment of the site. Notable aspects of the proposal are the change in the Proof of Parking location; this change would ensure that vehicle headlights would not impact the residential neighbors. The building was also moved closer to the golf course and farther from the residential properties, and the balconies have been recessed. Mr. May pointed out the roof garden and its environmental qualities, adding the garden roof includes a path that defines where one would walk. Concluding, Mr. May said building materials are curtain wall, cast stone, glass, stucco, brick, metal cornices and recessed balconies. Commissioner Workinger said in reviewing the plans he became concerned about spacing in front of the retail components especially if one of the retail components is a restaurant that wants outdoor seating. Mr. May acknowledged the probability of an eating establishment or coffee shop, adding when weather permits the tenant may desire outdoor seafing./Mr, May said presently what is planned for this "sidewalk" area re raised'olant rs. Mr. May said the goal of this outdoor sidewalk area is to Is create a pleasant space. Commissioner Workinger asked Mr. May if thwy ar committed to the,.pplanters, adding if vehicles park too close to the curb heir bumpers wilhspilI ovet,onto'ihe sidewalk area and with the planters and outdoor seating on the sidewalk area the area may become to tight to navigate safely. Mr May acknowledged -,that is good point and would seriously consider those c�mments: `Commissioner-- Workinger said in this narrow area he would prefefjhattthe planters remain as part of the plan. Commissioner Scherer asked Mr'May„if they are comfoftablo with the amount of parking spaces that are prq�iided'for he condoowners. Commissioner Scherer said in her o0inion the inajori y of people have at minimum two vehicles. Mr. May res�'onded � fgqels comfortable with the amount of parking spaces that are provided forthe c6ndb unit . HO/pointed out the spaces provided meet Code requirements, the sites ocated on the transit line, and residents of the building ayfwork in th area and could walk to work. Commissioner Sc� rer commented that while this may not be an issue she asked the-developers if-t!jey considered the possibility of errant golf balls hitting the - large expan -seof glass�on the proposed building. Mr. May responded that is a'good point, addi4�e glasswind8� s and glass features of the building will b6con�structed �to neet in Epational by -Ming code and he is sure the glass used for this project will,,4ave a'\safety factor' built in. Commissioner Brown moved to recommend Final Rezoning, Final ipmerit-Plan, Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and Conditional Use ,Approvarfpr esideritial dwelling units above the principal use subject to: 1. S\elb�ckvarli/nce7lorrn Highway 100 and West 77th Street, with final site pl'art adjustments regarding parking space sizes subject to approval\bx Panning and Engineering Departments. 2. Proof of Parking Variance 3. No drive- through facility. 4. Watershed District permits. 5. Affordable housing participation. 6. Intersection and signal operational analysis to be conducted by Applicant and submitted to the Transportation Commission for review; and 7. Installation of a 10 foot high fence, including gate along the northerly boundary line between subject site and residential neighbors. Commissioner Grabiel seconded the motion. Ayes; Scherer, Staunton, Schroeder, Thiss Grabiel, Brown, Workinger, Lonsbu oti o Earried. Commissioner Workinger commented h . a Id unhap if the proposed planters along the sidewalk were re & v - d an M. d o ly with outdoor restaurant seating. Akh16 4,95 \r'lr o e 0 REQUEST FOR COMMISSION /COUNCIL ACTION Originator Request Agenda # Planning Department Final Rezoning Approval Z -06 -1 Conditional Use Permit C-06 -2 Approval, Final Development Plan Approval, and Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for The Edina Gateway By Meeting Date/Time Approved: Dan Cornejo June 28, 2006 Interim Planning Director 7:00 PM GENERAL INFORMATION: Applicant: Edina Gateway, LLC — 4930 77th Street West, Edina, MN — PID 31- 028 -24 -33 -0009 Request: Final Rezoning Approval, Conditional Use Permit Approval, Final Development Plan, and Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Proposal: Construction of 4 -story building with retail at grade and 3 -floors of condo units above Existing Zoning: POD -1 Comprehensive Plan: Amend from Office to Commercial Deadline for Agency Action: N/A Application Date: October 10, 2005 60 Days: December 9, 2006 Extensions: yes 120 Days: STAFF REPORT: Background: At their May 2, 2006 meeting, City Council granted First Reading to Ordinance No. 850 -A -29, i.e. Preliminary Rezoning from Planned Office District 1 (POD -1) to Planned Commercial District 2 (PCD -2) — Edina Gateway LLC — 4930 77th Street West, conditioned upon: 1. Setback variance from Highway 100; 2. Proof of Parking Variance; 3. No drive - through any place on the site; 4. Final Rezoning to PCD -2; 5. Watershed District Permits; 6. Preparation of Final Development Plan, including landscaping plans addressing screening on the north side of the property; 7. Affordable housing participation requiring at least three of the dwelling units fit into the classification of affordable housing; 8. Conditional Use Permit; and 9. Intersection and signal operational analysis to analysis to be conducted per the Transportation Commission. Analysis: Setback Variance from Highway 100 Section 850.08 Parking and Circulation, Subd. 4 requires a parking setback of twenty (20) feet from a public right -of -way and ten (10) feet from an interior side lot line or a rear lot line. However, the interior side lot line setback applies only when the side lot line is a Planned Commercial District boundary. In this situation, the interior side lot line boundary is a Planned Office District 1 (POD -1), so this setback requirement does not apply. -Thi-s-application indicates -a setback of 5 feet from Highway 100, necessitating a variance of 15 feet. Also, this application indicates a setback of 10 feet from West 77th Street, necessitating a variance of 10 feet. In addition to the location of parking relative to the adjacent public rights -of- way, these requested parking setback variances also have a bearing on length of parking spaces indicated on the plans. In the review of the final site plans for this application, the Engineering Department has determined that the length of the 90- degree parking spaces (on the west and south portions of the site) does not meet the required 18 feet for standard spaces. The compact parking spaces on the east portion of the site do not meet the required 16 feet for compact spaces. Section 850.08 Parking and Circulation, Subd. 5C. Bumper Overhangs permits the minimum parking space length to be decreased by 1.5 feet for full size parking spaces and 1.0 foot for compact spaces which allow the bumper of the automobile to project beyond the terminus of the parking space without obstructing other parking spaces or vehicle circulation areas. However, in their review of these related issues, Planning and Engineering staff have concluded that the site plan should be revised so that the western and southern parking spaces could meet Code requirements with greater setback variances, i.e. 18.5 ft. from Highway 100, and 13.5 ft. from West 77th Street. Regarding the compact spaces on the eastern portion of the site, these spaces could be lengthened with no sideyard setback implications, since the setback requirements do not apply for the eastern sideyard. The Interim City Planner and the Engineer believe that these larger variances should be approved, with the final site plan adjustments to the length of the parking spaces to be determined by staff as part of building permit approval process. Proof of Parking Variance The residential component of this mixed -use proposal is required to provide 45 spaces. This application indicates that 45 spaces are provided, 42 enclosed and 3 exterior. However, the retail component is required to provide 92 spaces. The application indicates 92 spaces at grade, including 10 proof of parking spaces. The proof of parking spaces are located in the south side of the property near the commercial areas. At such time that the parking is needed, it can be constructed without affecting the residences within the project or any adjacent neighbors. The Applicant has agreed to enter into a Proof of Parking Agreement. No drive - through This proposal does not include a drive - through facility. Final Rezoning to PCD -2 See recommendation below. Watershed District Permits Prior to the start of construction, as part of the final staff approvals, the Applicant will provide the required proof of permits from the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. Final Development Plan See attached Final Development Plan dated June 7, 2006, including Landscape Plan on page 5 and Appendix A: Landscape Plans: Details for proposed 8 -ft. fence on northern boundary of property on page 16 (Sheet L102). This screening plan has no major changes from the revised preliminary development plan presented to the City Council. Affordable Housing Participation (minimum of three units) The primary vehicle for implementation of the affordable /workforce housing will be the utilization of the resources of the East Edina Housing Foundation and its second mortgage program. Edina Gateway will address its initial marketing to employees of the City, including police, fire, and administrative personnel; the school district; and major employers in the Southdale, Centennial, and Pentagon Park areas. The project will offer three 800 sq. ft., one - bedroom units to buyers with household incomes from $41,000 to $86,000. , See attached letter from Jim Nelson, dated June 22, 2006. Conditional Use Permit Section 850.16 Planned Commercial District (PCD),Subd. 6 Conditional Uses in PCD -1. PCD -2 and PCD -3 permits residential dwelling units above principal uses as a Conditional Use. This application indicates 12 apartment units (of condominium -style residential ownership) located on three floors (levels 2 -3-4), totaling 36 units. Intersection and Signal Operational Analysis This analysis, intended to optimize signal operations, will be conducted by the Applicant (and their consultant) prior to completion of the construction, the results of which will be submitted to the Transportation Commission for their review. The requirement for this Intersection and Signal Operational Analysis will be part of the Developer Agreement. Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan The current designation for this property is Office. This amendment would change the designation to Commercial. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of: 1. Final Rezoning of 4930 77th Street West from Planned Office District (POD -1) to Planned Commercial District (PCD -2). 2. Conditional Use Permit for residential dwelling units above the principal use, subject to the following conditions: 1. Setback variances from Highway 100 and West 77th Street, as noted above, with final site plan adjustments regarding parking space sizes subject to approval by Planning and Engineering Departments. 2. Proof of Parking variance. 3. No drive - through facility. 4. Watershed district permits. 5. Affordable housing participation as outlined in this report. 6. Intersection and signal operational analysis to be conducted by the Applicant and submitted to the Transportation Commission for review. 4 , 3. Final Development Plan, dated June 7, 2006, subject to revisions to parking provision as indicated in this report. 4. Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, changing the designation of 4930 77th Street West from Office to Commercial. MEMORANDUM To: Kristine Aaker, Assistant Planner City of Edina From: Jim Nelson, Owner's Representative Edina Gateway Project - 4930 West 77th Street Date: June 22, 2006 Re: Implemenation of Workforce Housing Condition Prior to preliminary approval by the Edina Planning Commission on February 1, the Edina Gateway Development team met with representatives of the Edina Housing Task Force and the Affordable Housing Initiative Coalition to understand the objectives of those groups in addressing Edina's affordable and workforce housing needs. One of the original goals of the proposed development has been to provide housing options at a price point that address the "live where you work" possibilities in Edina. We welcome the condition that requires a minimum of three "affordable" or workforce housing units in the Gateway project. The primary vehicle for implementation of the workforce housing assistance program will be the utilization of the resources of the East Edina Housing Foundation and its second mortgage program. This resource achieved a level of success in the 1980's with its assistance to homebuyers in the Edinborough and Centennial Lakes housing developments by making 300 loans, of which 250 have been repaid. The board of the East Edina Housing Foundation is currently updating the criteria for its second mortgage program so that its resources may be utilized with local first mortgage lending programs and other available assistance from Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA), Metropolitan Council and Hennepin County. The coordinated use of these programs will achieve the level of affordability necessary to facilitate the purchase of three or more units in the Edina Gateway project within the community's desired workforce housing objectives. Edina Gateway will address its initial marketing to employees of the City, including police, fire and administrative personel; the school district; and major employers in the Southdale, Centennial Lakes and Pentagon Park areas. The Gateway sales staff will be trained to offer the housing assistance program to eligible buyers, and additional information about the program will be provided to area real estate companies. The lending organizations will be familiar with the project and the programs, and prepared to offer counsel and assistance to applicants. The product price range, although not final at this point, is estimated to be at the $300 /square foot level. The project will offer three 800 /square foot, one bedroom units that should directly address the minimum price level qualification. Based on preliminary information, buyers with household income from $41,000 to $86,000 could qualify for assistance, not only for the minimum unit size, but possibly for smaller two .bedroom units as well. The unit sizes will range from approximately 800 /square feet to 1490 square feet. We appreciate the support of the Edina affordable housing advocacy groups and the cooperation of the City staff in working with us to update the second mortgage program and to develop relationships with local mortgage lenders who are developing standards that make the programs workable. We hope to exceed the minimum requirement of the workforce housing condition. The following is an example of the criteria being proposed by Bremer Bank, who would act as first mortgage lender and processor of the second mortgage from East Edina Housing Foundation. (This information is in the discussion stage and should be regarded as preliminary, not final.) Workforce Housing Program: Criteria — • Owner — occupied only • Annual interest payments on 2 "d mortgage, no principal • Require pre - closing homeownership counseling for first time homebuyers • 30% of total family income applied to housing expense Example: Interest rate on 15` mortgage 6.375 %, 40 year amortization Sale Price $225,000 1" Mortgage P & I Payment $1,107 Down Payment Private Mortgage Insurance 83 Loan from 1/12 Property Taxes 200 E.E.H.F. - 33,000 1/12 Property Insurance 60 ls` Mortgage Monthly Payment Assistance -75 Amount $192,000 Total Monthly Payment $1,375 2 "d Mortgage Interest 75 Gross Income Total Payment $1,450 Required - $ 40,465 Edina Gateway follow -up material Dan Cornejo From: May, Paul G. [PMay @millerdunwiddie.comj Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 8:46 AM To: kaaker @ci.edina.mn.us; dancornejo @comcast.net; dcornejo @ci.edina.mn.us Cc: jnelson @eberhardtadvisory.com; mgk @wayzataproperties.com; Lau, Craig R. Subject: Edina Gateway follow -up material Attachments: Memo 060621 City.pdf Kristine and Dan- Page 1 of 1 Attached is a memo to follow up on your questions regarding the 9 City Council conditions placed on the Gateway Development project. I hope this will assist in the finalization of your staff report. Please contact me if you have further questions. Paul <<Memo 060621 City.pdf>> Paul G. May, AIA Architect miller dunwiddie architecture 123 North Third Street Suite 104 Minneapolis, MN 55401 d:612- 278 -7712 f:612- 337 -0031 p:612- 337 -0000 www.millerdunwiddie.com 6/22/2006 miller dunwiddie ARCHITECTURE Date: June 21, 2006 Project: Edina Gateway KAM 0505 MEMORANDUM 123 North Third Street Suite 104 Minneapolis MN 55401 -1657 www.miLlerdunwiddie.com p 612- 337 -0000 1 612-337 -0031 RE: Final Development Plan: Response to Project Conditions To: Kristine Aaker, Assistant Planner From: Paul G. May, AIA Summarized below are follow -up responses /additional information from the development team to the 9 conditions for the project noted in the City Council approval of May 2, 2006. 1) Setback Variance from Highway 100: This setback variance is for the. parking area and not the building. The building meets the setback requirements (50 feet) on all sides. The setback for parking is 20 feetYfrom street Right of WaYr and 10 from interior lot lines. The actual setback along Highway 0 Is 5'feet and along West 77 h street is 10 feet. We requested variance is applicable as there is significant green space within the rights of way. 2) Proof of parking Variance: We have requested a proof of parking variance of 10 spaces. This parking is for the commercial portion of the project. The intent of the proof of parking is to minimize the amount of parking lot space, until such time it may be required. The proof of parking spaces are also located in south side of the property near the commercial areas. At such time that the parking is needed, it can be constructed without affecting the residences within the projector any adjacent neighbors. 3) No drive - through any place on the site: There will not be a drive - through within the project. 4) Final Rezoning to PCD -2: The Final Development Plan application has been submitted to the City for review. 5) Watershed District Permits: Final watershed district permits will result from the review of the final detailed develop plans of the design team. This will be completed prior to construction beginning. 6) Preparation of Final Development Plan including landscaping plans addressing screening on the north side of the property: Final development plans have been submitted to the City. Sheet L102 contains the landscaping plan further detailing the screening along the north side. This screening plan has no major changes from the revised preliminary development plan presented to the.City Council Edina Gateway Page 2 7) Affordable housing participation requiring that at least three of the dwelling units fit into the classification of affordable housing: A letter from Mr. Jim Nelson, owner's representative for the project, is being submitted under separate cover providing more detail regarding the implementation of the plan. I . 8) Conditional Use Permit: A conditional use permit for residential use within the PCD -2 District has been part of the application process. 12 units of condominium style residential ownership are to be located on each of the levels 2-4, totaling 36 units. 9) Intersection and signal operational analysis to be conducted per the Transportation Commission: This will be completed prior to construction of the project, when the analysis will reflect the conditions at that time. UAKAM\KAM05050ocumentation\A - Architects\A5 Code Review \Memo 060621 City.doc Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2006 ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND ORDERING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. A -2 WHEREAS, the Edina City Council on the 41h day of April, 06, fixed a date for Council hearing on the proposed street reconstruction, Improve nt No. A -223; and WHEREAS, ten days' mailed notice and two weeks' pu is notice of the h ing was given, and the hearing was held thereon on the 2nd day, f May 2006, for Impr ement No. A -223 Alley Improvement between Beard and Ab ott Avenues recons ding the existing bituminous pavement and base, repairing t storm sewer and ding where needed at which time all persons desiring to be h d were given an o ortunity to be heard thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED at the Council ha my considered the views of all persons interested, and being ful advised of the pe ent facts, does hereby determine to proceed with the constr tion of said im ovement, including all proceedings which may be necessary in minent domain for a acquisition of necessary easements and rights hereby design ed and shall be ferred to in all subsequent proceedings as Improvement No. A 23 Alley Improve ent between Beard and Abbott Avenues reconstructing the existi bituminous pave ent and base, repairing the storm sewer and grading where neede BE IT FURTHER RES VED that Impro ement No. A -223 Alley Improvement between Beard and Abbott enues reconstruc ' g the existing bituminous pavement and base, repairing the storm er and grading ere needed is hereby ordered as proposed with construction of th s improvement to a completed during the 2006 construction season. BE IT FURTH RESOLVED th the feasibility report for Improvement No. A -223 is hereby received b the Edina City C uncil. BE IT FUR ER RESOLVE that the City Engineer is hereby designated as the engineer for thi improvement. T e engineer shall cause plans and specifications to be prepared for th . making of su7.ay ' provement. Adopt this 2nd day of 2006. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. FIRST READING GRANTED TO ORDINANCE NO. 850 -A -29 PRELIMINARY REZONING PLANNED OFFICE DISTRICT 1 TO PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 2 - EDINA GATEWAY LLC - 4930 77m STREET WEST Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and placed on file. Member Housh entered the meeting at 8:25 P.M. Manager Hughes stated the property was located at 4930 West 77th Street and was presently zoned Planned Office District POD -1. He stated the proposal was to rezone the property to Planned Commercial District PCD -2 and also to issue a Conditional Use Permit for the property to permit housing as a conditional use as part of the project. Mr. Hughes explained the approval for the Edina Gateway LLC project would be a two -step process. He noted the conditional use permit and comprehensive plan would not be considered until the final rezoning and final development plan were requested. Page 9 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2006 Mr. Hughes said the Planning Commission at their February 1, 2006, meeting, recommended preliminary rezoning approval to PCD -2 and also recommended approval of the requested conditional use permit. Those conditions included: final rezoning of the property to PCD -2; Watershed District Permits; preparation of Final Development Plan including landscaping plans addressing screening on . the north -side of the property; affordable housing participation requiring that at least three of the dwelling units fit into the classification of affordable housing; and final, rezoning conditional upon the issuance of the conditional use permit for the residential portion of the project. He added the Transportation Commission also recommended the following conditions: Intersection and signal operational analysis would be conducted per their recommendation; and a sidewalk connection be made from the project down to West 771h Street. Mr. Hughes noted the plans before the Council included the Transportation Commission's requested sidewalk connection to West 77th Street. Proponent Presentation Jim Nelson, 7790 Lochmere Terrace, introduced the members of the Gateway LLC Project Team: Dan Green and Paul May, Architects, Miller Dunwiddie Architecture; Craig Vaughn, SRF Traffic Consultants; Ben Hartberg, Landscape Architect; Sara Harris, partner to Jim. Nelson; and M.G. Cominksy, Edina Gateway LLC. Mr. Nelson reviewed the request of Edina Gateway LLC for rezoning from POD to PCD -2 with a conditional use permit for residential as part of a mixed use property. He said the retail portion would be approximately 15,000 square feet on the south side of the development, with the north side being an enclosed parking garage and 26 units of condominiums in three levels above the garage. Mr. Nelson said the retail will not be converted to condominiums, and Edina Gateway will retain ownership and lease the property to its retail tenants. Mr. Nelson said the proponent has made an effort to respond to the Planning Commission conditions. He said that they have included affordable housing units in their residential component. After meeting with the Edina Affordable Housing Coalition, their plan was to utilize a second mortgage program to provide the affordable units in conjunction with East Edina Housing Foundation. Mr. Nelson said the condos' price points ranged from $240,000 for one bedroom units to.between $350,000 and $450,000 for the two bedroom units. He said there would be 21 one bed units and _15 two bedroom units. Mr. Nelson said the requested change of use was driven by the need to upgrade a forty -five year old class C office building. He said there was also a market in the surrounding area for. the service retail and housing based upon a "Live Where You Work" concept. Mr. Nelson reported their planning process included: neighborhood meetings, held on December 15, 2005 and March 15, 2005; City Planning Staff meetings; one on one sessions with Planning Commission members; and some one on one neighbor meetings which led to the proponent developing an understanding of the needs of the neighbors abutting their site; for screening, privacy fencing and landscaping. It also fostered understanding of the neighbors as to what was being proposed for the site. Page 10 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2006 Paul May, Miller Dunwiddie Architecture, using a graphic reviewed in detail the updated site plan and the requested change of use as follows: Planning Rationale • To provide a zoning and use transition, blending between residential and commercial uses at a unique location. • To bring housing options to an area of Edina where living and working in the same neighborhood can be possible • To innovate within the bounds of zoning guidelines (residential within PCD-2) and bring mixed -use redevelopment to an area of the City and a property that has been showing its age • To provide retail use alternatives in close proximity to an underserved population Zoning Request POD -1 PCD -2 • Rezone site from "POD-1 (Planned Maximum Height 50' 50' Office District) to PCD -2 (Planned Minimum Setback 50' 50' Commercial District) Residential Use None CUP • Conditional Use Permit for Residential within PCD -2 • Reduction in Parking Setback at West and South property boundary • Proof -of- Parking for ten (10) spaces on South Dan Green, Miller Dunwiddie Architecture, reviewed the design features of the proposed project using graphics as follows: Design Features of the Building • Mixed -Use: Residential above Commercial • Commercial Retail/ Restaurant Development • Floors 2-4 have a stepped profile to reduce height impacts and shadows while. maximizing views and light for residents and neighbors • Garden roof on second level to reduce storm -water runoff, reduce impervious surface and provide a visual amenity to residents and neighbors • Residential parking located internal to building • Major areas of parking for retail are located on the West and South sides of the building • Service entry and trash room located away from residential • Screening between � properties utilizing a combination of privacy fencing and landscaping • Fire Lane - flexible outdoor space created for residents using innovative surface materials • Designed access to minimize traffic flow on the north side of site • Potential location of proof of parking Craig Vaughn, SRF Traffic Consultant reviewed the traffic study conducted as follows: • Study objective was to determine the traffic impacts associated with the proposed redevelopment and make recommendations necessary to mitigate traffic issues Page 11 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2006 • Developed trip generation estimates for the proposed development using industry standard trip generation rates • Developed trip distribution patterns based on historical traffic volume data within the project study area • Conducted an operations analysis at four key intersections during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours for existing, future no build and future ,build conditions Trip Generation Estimates • Applied the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) trip generation methodology • Land use type and size were approximated in order to account for a conservative estimate • Resultant trip generation estimates were: • A.M. Peak Hour = 35 in trips / 55 out trips • P.M. Peak Hour = 75 in trips / 25 out trips. • *Existing land rise was currently generating approximately 40 A.M. peak hour trips and 45. P.M. peak hour trips Trip Distribution Estimates • Reviewed historical count data along the regional and local roadway network • Reviewed existing turning movement count data • Determined the following trip distribution percentages: - TH 100 (North) = 40 percent - TH 100 (South) = 30 percent - W 77th Street (East) = 20 percent - W 77th Street (West) =10 percent Traffic Operation Analysis • Existing condition: all key intersections currently operated at acceptable levels of service. • No build condition: all key intersections will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service • Build condition: all key intersections will operate at acceptable levels of service, with signal timing modifications at three key intersections along W. 77th Street Traffic Summary • Study objective was to determine the traffic impacts associated with the proposed development and make recommendations necessary to mitigate traffic issues • Redevelopment of the existing office site will result in approximately 90 a.m. and 100 p.m. peak hour additional vehicle trips. However, the existing land use has the potential to generate approximately 70 a.m. and 65 p.m. peak hour vehicle trips • The adjacent roadway network will operate acceptably with minor mitigation measures (i.e., signal timing improvements) • TDMP Member Masica asked whether the proposed eight foot fence would be allowed under Edina Code, for further detail on a "French balcony', exterior materials proposed, drainage from the proposed "garden roof', the location of catch basins, how many affordable units were proposed, and what if any variances were being requested. Page 12 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2006 Mr. Hughes explained Edina Code restricted fences to six feet in front yard so the proposed sideyard fence was allowed by Code. He also explained the variances requested for the property related to parking setback from the Highway 100 ramp and also parking quantity which the proponent proposed to satisfy with a proof of parking agreement. Mr. Green explained French balconies were very shallow allowing only a door to be open, but no area for seating or outdoor activities. He added the building was more conceptual currently, but the upper level of the building was proposed to be pre -case cement and glass with the base of the building glazed with windows and aluminum throughout the entire structure. Mr. May explained the "green roof" would drain just the same as a regular roof into storm drains located as required by the City on the property. He pointed out the locations using a graphic of the site plan. Mr. Nelson stated at the current time three units were designated as affordable units, but that he did not want to limit or stretch the project at this time noting that possible more units could be affordable. Member Swenson's questions included: the location where trash will be kept and picked up, were 'the common areas' on the green roof for condo residents only, and would the proponent guarantee no drive through restaurants on the site. Mr. May used the graphic to demonstrate the circulation on the west and east sides pointing out the trash storage location and how it would be accessed to be removed. He added the upper patios on the green roof would be used only by condo residents and their guests. Mr. May assured the Council there would be no drive through restaurants on the site. Member Housh asked about the proposed price points of the unit, what type of retail was proposed, how large a restaurant would be located in the retail area, and commented that when the Final Plans were submitted the Council's expectation was that the project would be built exactly as depicted on the plans. Mr. May explained the price points would range from about $240,000 to $450,000 with the one bedroom units at the lower end and the two bedroom units at the upper end. Mr. Nelson said that he expected the retail to include dry cleaner, UPS Store, and a small restaurant offering soup, salads and sandwiches. He added they did not. intend to house a drive through or serve alcohol. Member Hulbert asked if the fire lane was. required or optional and also for more detail on the "green roof ". Mr. May said the fire lane would be used by emergency and service vehicles. Mr. Hartberg explained a green roof would have an irrigation system below the soil. It would be designed to hold rain water and have plantings and patio areas for use by residents. He added it could hold storm water from semi intensive rains of between approximately four inches up to twelve inches. Mayor Hovland's questions included: further detail on the use of green roofs; the location of the proposed fence on the north side of the project; where the plantings were proposed; who would be eligible for the "affordable" housing units; and whether any qualifiers could be added to favor Edina residents receiving the affordable units. Mr. May said it was the goal of the developer to have the green roof manage up to twelve inches of rainfall allowing the water to be filtered two to three times before it flows into the catch basins and storm sewer. He said the north side fence will be built behind the retaining wall and the landscape plantings would be on the Gateway property. Mr. Nelson said he believed persons who Page 13 4 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2006 qualify under the Metropolitan Council's guidelines would be eligible for the affordable housing units. He added they have been working with the East Edina Housing Foundation and some local banks. Mr. Hughes added that it was not possible to place local restrictions on affordable housing so only Edina residents were eligible, but that preference could be given to Edina residents who qualified for the units. Public Comment Betty Conners, 7504 West Shore Drive, asked about the height of the retaining wall. Ms. Connors said that she was a walker and would like to continue walking without jumping down a four and a half foot retaining wall. Doug Mayo, 6041 Tower Avenue, Edina Housing Initiative, commented on how expensive housing has become in Edina. Mr. Mayo noted the proponent has agreed to provide between three and nine affordable housing units in the project. He urged approval of the project. Jeff Hugget, 4008 Woodland Drive, member of the Edina Housing Task Force, also spoke in support of the project and urged approval. Member Masica made a motion to close the public hearing, seconded by Member Hulbert. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Masica commented the proponent had done a good job working with the neighbors in satisfying their concern. She felt the project filled a need in the community and stated her intention to support the project Member Hulbert concurred with Member Masica. She added she felt the Council needed to be careful with what was approved next to residential areas. Member Hulbert said she generally supported the project, but asked that there be no drive - throughs or any liquor license of any type be allowed on the project. Member Housh said he agreed with previous speakers in his appreciation of the developer's efforts to work with the neighbors. He said he was not sure about limiting the site to no liquor licenses of any type. Member Swenson said she felt the timing of the project was good, she agreed she liked the way the developer worked with the neighbors, the green roof was very timely and a condition of approval must include that no drive - through would be allowed on the site. Mayor Hovland stated he also liked the project and the collaborative effort the developer and neighbors brought forward which ultimately yielded a better project. He praised the project for its inclusion of affordable housing and the green roof. Mayor Hovland cautioned the developer, that when they brought forward final plans they must be very specific and intend to build their project exactly per the plans presented to the Council. Mayor Hovland supported the rezoning and adding a condition of no drive - throughs. He asked staff to review the necessary conditions. Page 14 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2006 Mr. Hughes reviewed the conditions as follows: 1) Setback variance from Highway 100; 2) Proof of Parking Variance; 3) No drive - through any place on the site; 4) Final Rezoning to PCD -2; 5) Watershed District Permits; 6) Preparation of Final Development Plan including landscaping plans addressing screening on the north side of the property; 7) Affordable housing participation requiring that at least three of the dwelling units fit into the classification of affordable housing; 8) Conditional Use Permit; and 9) Intersection and signal operational analysis to analysis to be conducted per the Transportation Commission. Mr. Hughes and Mr. Gilligan said it would not be possible to put conditions on the zoning so prohibiting liquor licenses from the site could not be a condition of the requested rezoning. Member Swenson made a motion to made a motion to grant First Reading to Ordinance No. 850 -A -29 conditioned upon: 1) Setback variance from Highway 100; 2) Proof of Parking Variance; 3) No drive- through any place on the site; 4) Final Rezoning to PCD -2; 5) Watershed District Permits; 6) Preparation of Final Development Plan including landscaping plans addressing screening on the north side of the property; 7) Affordable housing participation requiring that at least three of the dwelling units fit into the classification of affordable housing; 8) Conditional Use Permit; and 9) Intersection and signal operational analysis to analysis to be conducted per the Transportation Commission. Member Housh seconded the motion. Rollcall Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -56 ADOPTED GRANTING FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN TARGET CORPORATION - 7000 YORK AVENUE SOUTH Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and placed on file. Mr. Hughes explained the request before the Council was for Final Development Plan for Target Corporation at 7000 York Avenue South. He said the property was properly zoned PCD -3 for the proposed use. Mr. Hughes said Edina Code required the proponent to obtain a Final Development Plan for the size of the proposed expansion. He reported the project had been reviewed by the Planning Commission on March 1, 2006, and again on March 29, 2006. The Planning Commission at their March 29, 2006, meeting, recommended denial of the requested Final Development Plan. He noted the Council had received their reasons for denial which included: proponent's lack of housing, disappointment with building design and exterior building materials and no evidence of a hardship to support the requested variance. Mr. Hughes reported the Transportation Commission reviewed the Target Expansion Impact Study and TDM Plan at their December 15, 2005, meeting and approved the study and TDM plan with conditions. He said that Alice Roberts Davis would lead off the Target presentation. Proponent Presentation Alice Roberts Davis, Real Estate Manager, Target Corporation, said she is responsible for the project. Ms. Davis said a Super Target in the community would be a great amenity due to its Page 15 Jackie Hoogenakker From: DEBerg100 @aol.com nt: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 1:11 PM 10: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: case file: Z -06 -1 RE: EDINA GATEWAY, LLC I am, David E. Berg of 4905 Poppy Lane in Edina ph #952 - 927 -4988 I am a lifelong Edina resident, growing up on Edina Blvd. and purchased my first home on Hollywood Rd. I have lived on Poppy Lane since 1989. I am in favor of the new condo) retail unit over the current office building. My only comment is that the building sketches were of a very ugly,' contemporary building ..... NOT fitting into the standards Edina has set over the years. This very well could be the first of many such buildings to line the south side of the golf course .... and will set the pace for decoration. The current plan is ugly ... and the coordinator of the project agrees. If we're going to put up a building, let's make it look good! You'll only be helping the owner, who obviously is color blind .... more people will want to live / shop there if it doesn't look like a building that belongs on South Beach in Miami. Picture the building in Downtown Edina ... that's what Edina's "look" is .... upscale traditional .... lasting .... NOT South Beach contemporary. Thank You!! vid E. Berg 7/14/2006 To: Mayor & City Council From: Dan Cornejo Interim City Planner Date:. July 18, 2006 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Subject: Conditional Use Permit for St. Patrick' Catholic Church 6820 St. Patrick's Lane Recommendation: Agenda Item: II. B. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action: ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion At their June 28, 2006, Planning Commission meeting the Commission recommended Conditional Use Permit Approval and that the Applicant met the findings ,for. the granting of a conditional use permit: 1: Will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, and general welfare; 2.: Will not cause undue traffic hazards, congestion, or parking shortages; 3. Will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment, or decrease the value, of other property in the vicinity, and will not be a nuisance; 4. Will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of other property in the .vicinity; 5. Will not create an excessive burden on parks, streets, and other public facilities; 6. Conforms to the applicable restrictions and special conditions of the district in which it is located; and 7. Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Conditions for approval including variances are: 1. Staff approval of final landscape plan and schedule of plantings. 2. Applicant obtains a Watershed District permit. 3. The suggestion that the church conduct further soil studies. Info /Background: See attached Staff Report, Planning Commission Minutes, correspondence and plans. PC MEETING JUNE 28, 2006 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JUNE 28, 2006 — C-06 -5 Conditional Use Permit St. Patrick's Catholic Church 6820 St. Patrick's Lane _ Mr. Cornejo informed the Commission,St. Pateick'syCatholic,Church -is a , 13 acre parcel in West Edina located off Valley,View and,Gleason Roads. Mr/ Cornejo said St. Patrick's Church is requesting''Conditional ;Use Permitto, "� construct a garage, trash enclosure, labyrinth, sidewalk modification and repair and resurfacing of the existing parking lot. Continuing, Mr.,Cornejo noted the proposed garage is residential in nature and its 'impact would,be minimal. Variances are required for the garage.,/ " Mr. Come jo concluded staff supports the request fora-Conditional Use Permit including variances subject to: V • Staff approval of finai'landscape plan__and schedule of plantings. • Applicant obtains a Watershed;,District permit. Mr. Snyder architect for the project and Mr. Crow, along with church members were - present. \ Commissioner Grabiel askedyhy Co%nmission action would be required for the labyrinth, it reaty isn't'a structures Mr. Cornejo said any change to the site plan triggers the need for a Conditional Use Permit. Commissioner Staunton commented it appears to him the major issues of this Rroposat'are the proposed garage and trash enclosure and questioned if the Commission w4e�to deny /ihe CUP for just the garage would the concrete enclosure'the proposed,f araqe� would be constructed on remain. Mr. Cornejo responded thaexisting concrete structure would remain as is. He said that concrete structure,has been located on the site for many years. Mr. Paul Snyder & R, architect for the project told the Commission the concrete structure that will serve as the base for the proposed garage has been on the site for many years and in the past the structure was used as an enclosure for an oil tank farm. Mr. Snyder told the Commission another piece that is very interesting about this concrete structure is that the main gas meter and other utilities for the church are located in the structure and to move or PC MEETING JUNE 28, 2006 demolish the structure would also impact the utility connections that continue to serve the church. Mr. Snyder said in reviewing the site constructing the proposed garage on this concrete structure made the most sense. Mr. Snyder said the concrete structure seems to create an attractive nuisance for teens. Concluding, Mr. Snyder explained the proposed garage is residential in nature and would keep church vehicles off the parking lot. The proposed screening of the trash enclosure also "cleans up" the site. i,, Commissioner Staunton noted there ap trees on the south end of the church site. Mr. adding there are large coniferous trees betwe( existing concrete structure. Mr. Snyder said Itt to screen the concrete structure /garage fromit Brown told the Commission he knows that hog vegetation provides screening between propel Chair Lonsbury asked Mr. Snyder if tl and if soil testing was done. Mr. Snyder re6 representative informed the Commission he and believes the church would be am,enablE Mr. Mike Crow, representing church held a neighborhood meeti changes to the church campus. H expressed concern with the- cpncre could get hurt climbing opli. Mr. �.0 nuisance for teens, adding,,he beli- the attractiveness-of this isolated s previously -fnen trees vyilf remaii Church of St. "P proposed imprc would abPrecia chu :luding, Mr.' is one�of th your su be a number of large onfirmed That statement afest house'and the nearest rouse. -c; very well, adding conta ners have` 3d he is no't -certa believes \Phase I W.- to further soil tests. an removed A church was done, the church informed the Commission the ng informing neighbors of the proposed c,said not only.the/chu`rch but neighbors to structure and the possibility that someone row said this. -area- -has also been an attractive eves the construction of a garage will eliminate )ot:_- \Continuing, Mr. Crow pointed out as to contains a number of large trees and those Crow said- in his opinion the campus of the e most beautiful sites in Edina and the enhance the site. Mr. Crow stated the church Ms. Jo`Ellen Dever, 7405 Oaklawn Avenue, told the Commission she thinks the construction of a' new;garage and screening the trash enclosure(s) is a plus for the site; howeverher problem is with the three signs posted on the site informing residents a bondio nal Use Permit has been requested. Ms. Dever stated the three signs do not meet Code standards. Ms. Dever suggested to avoid confusion thatthe;church erect new signs according to code. Ms. Dever added she was surprised to learn the church is responsible for erecting the required informational signs, not the City, concluding there may be a better way to "get the word out" when an application is made. Chair Lonsbury thanked Ms. Dever adding it is possible the City could do a better job on the procedural part of the application to make sure applicants are F, PC MEETING JUNE 28, 2006 aware of the sign requirement, and to ensure sign(s) are erected according to code. Chair Lonsbury urged church members to erect the proper signs before the City Council hears this request. Concluding, Chair Lonsbury said he was aware of the inadequate signs prior to this discussion and learned from staff that three signs were erected; however, the font size was incorrect and the color bands of the signs were incorrect. Chair Lonsbury said in a sense, even though the signs did not meet the letter of the code they alerted the neighborhood and City Hall received a number of inquiries on what the church_ was-proposing. A church representative acknowledged thieo .,signs were posted; however because of time restraints they were hand -made withoutthe proper`type font or the required red /black bands. (` �;��'�� Commissioner Staunton added if he understands City Code correctly thi "s "oversight" does not nullify the proceedings this,evening and. the Commission can act on the request: Commissioner Staunton also rged church­, imembers to erect the signs according to code as soon as possible. Commissioner Grabiel moved to/recommend Cond Approval subject to: staff approval of final landscape plate, plantings and Watershed District permits.(/ Conditions of a include setback variance for the garage and that addition conducted. Commissioner Scherer s6conddd th/e motion' Chair Lonsbury said,ai meets the findings for the/gra 1. Will,.Dromote and general welfare;'\, 2. Will not cause undd 3. �l ill not be inju us of other property,ln 4." Will not impede the of other property)n ,.5` Will not create all e: facilities\ vote indicates the the permit: �[ Use Permit schedule of val are also to I tests are . itional Use Permit ance'the general public welfare and will not be irtger the,public health, safety, morals, and traffic heza rs, congestion, or parking shortages; ),,the use and enjoyment, or decrease the value, e.,vicinity, and will not be a nuisance; )rural and orderly development and improvement burden on parks, streets, and other public 6. Conforms to'the applicable restrictions and special conditions of the district in which it is located; and 7. In consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Ayes; Scherer, Staunton, Schroeder, Grabiel, Brown, Thiss, Workinger, Lonsbury. Abstain, Workinger. Motion carried. M REQUEST FOR COMMISSION /COUNCIL ACTION. o e N ry � .�y Originator Request Agenda # Planning Department Conditional Use Permit C-06 -5 Dan Cornejo Meeting Date/Time Approved: Interim Planning Director June 28, 2006 / 7 PM PC 6/28/06 GENERAL INFORMATION: Applicant: The Church of St. Patrick of Edina 6820 St. Patrick's Lane / PID: 06- 116 -21-44 -0004 Request: Amendment to Conditional Use Permit Approval Proposal: Construction of garage on existing foundation walls, construction of a labyrinth, and other related improvements Existing Zoning: R -1 Comprehensive Plan: Quasi Public Deadline for Agency Action: Application Date: June 7, 2006 60 Days: August. 7, 2006 Extensions: 120 Days: STAFF REPORT:, Background: On June 17, 1991 St. Patrick's Church was granted a Conditional Use Permit for additions to the church building for office space, nursery, choir room, and entry gathering space. New driveways were constructed from Valley View Road to serve the new entry. The only significant public issue with that development was how storm water from the site was being handled. As a condition of approval, the church agreed to redirect the runoff into the public storm sewer system. Project Site and Context/Neighborhood Description: The project site is located on the SE quadrant of Valley View Road and Gleason Road. The overall site contains approximately 13 acres. The current project proposal contains a several items on various locations within the site, detailed below under Project bescription. To the northwest of this property lies St. Albans Church, at the edge of the Indian Hills neighborhood. To the north, east, south, and west lay single - family homes Project Description: The Church of St. Patrick is planning to improve its facilities through several projects on a portion of the site south of the church, the existing parking lots, and at the northeast entrance to the classroom wing: 1. Vehicle Storage Garage (on existing foundation walls) at southern perimeter of the site. The proposed vehicle storage garage has been designed to utilize the existing concrete foundation, which was originally used to screen three large fuel tanks in a semi - sunken enclosure. The existing concrete foundation will be modified to allow placement of 12" thick precast concrete planks over the walls, to create the garage floor. The new garage has been designed to be residential in nature, and uses materials that are present in the existing church, i.e. red brick with white trim. The roof will be of a four hip design with shingles. -The dimensions of the proposed garage are 28 ft. by 36 ft. (1,008 sq. ft.). The height of the proposed garage will be 15 ft. on the parking lot side, and 24 ft. 6 in. on the proposed labyrinth side. The location of the existing structure is 9.6 feet from the south and west property corner, which is inside the required 50 ft. setback for a new structure of this type in this zoning district. 2. Trash Enclosure, also at the southern perimeter, adjacent to the proposed garage. The new trash enclosure would replace the three large dumpsters that currently sit on the west parking lot. The trash enclosure would be constructed of brick with gates made of steel frame and composite boards of colors to match the church and garage. The dimensions of the proposed trash enclosure are 14 ft. by 28 ft. (392 sq. ft.). 3. Labyrinth, also at the southern perimeter, directly east of the proposed garage, in a depressed area of the site, roughly 7 -10 ft. below the level of the parking lot. This application contains only a preliminary design for the proposed labyrinth. Materials have not been determined, but typically the materials are brick, stone pavers, or crushed rock for the pathways, and grass or ground cover infill the spaces between the walkways. Additional landscaping, including trees and shrubs, Access to the labyrinth will be from the Church building on the north, via a simple concrete stairway. The Applicant intends that this new labyrinth provide a more park -like experience desiring a quiet contemplative retreat; this labyrinth will be open to use by the neighbors. 4. Parking lot improvements, to the east and west parking lots. The church plans to repair and resurface the east and west parking lots, including demolition of much of the paved surface to bring the underlying soil structure to correct bearing capacity; the lots will then be top dressed and restriped. 5. Sidewalk modifications, on the northeast side of the church building. A small section of sidewalk will be added from the eastern church entrance to the north -south sidewalk which leads from the parking lot to the administrative entrance to the classroom wing. Analysis of Issues: With respect to the siting of the proposed vehicle storage garage, the church is requesting a variance from the required 50 ft. setback. A variance is granted when the strict enforcement of the Code would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the petitioner's property and the granting of said variance is in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Code. "Undue hardship" means that (i) the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use as allowed by the Code, (ii) the plight of the petitioner is due to circumstances unique to the petitioner's property which were not created by the petitioner; and (iii) the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the property or its surroundings. The Applicant has provided the following arguments in response: 1. The existing foundation, which is proposed to be used as the foundation for the garage, is 9.6 ft. from the Property line. We believe that moving the existing structure would be an undue hardship which was not self - imposed. In addition, moving the structure would not be a mere inconvenience. 2. The conditions that exist are unique to this property. The owner believes the new garage at this location will correct the current unsightly and somewhat hazardous conditions, while providing secure storage for the church vehicles. 3. These improvements maintain the property rights of adjacent land owners and other properties in the district. The existing conditions have existed from the time the church was built and the planned improvements will provide a more "neighborhood friendly" facility. 4. The design of the garage facility has been developed with the public welfare in mind. The church sincerely believes that this new structure will benefit the public welfare and will not injure other properties in the vicinity or zoning district. Staff has reviewed this response and believes it makes a reasonable case for approval. This proposed garage, at the location proposed, is an acceptable solution to mitigating an existing "nuisance," while providing a new facility for the church to store church vehicles in a manner that is more in character with the surrounding properties and neighborhood. With respect to the proposed trash enclosure, the only public issue relates to the change in the storm water runoff from the site, due to the need to build up a portion of the sloping area to the east of the parking lot to provide a base for the trash enclosure. This plan has been referred to the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District for review and comment. With respect to the proposed labyrinth, there are two public issues. This labyrinth is proposed to be a significant feature on the site, and therefore, the final design should-be reviewed- and approved by staff. When this is completed, the Applicant should submit an amended overall site plan to the City for inclusion into the official Conditional Use Permit file. Second, the final plan is likely to cause some change in the drainage patterns for that area, as well as affect the storm water runoff situation for the entire site. Therefore, even though this plan is submitted as preliminary, staff has referred it to the Nine Mile Creek Watershed. District for review and comment of this feature. With respect to items 4 and 5 above (parking lot improvements and sidewalk modifications), these are minor in nature and deemed acceptable by staff with no further comment necessary. Nevertheless, the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District has been asked to review this component of the application. Finally, the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District has responded that their review of the preliminary plans concluded that the final plans will be required to obtain a permit for the parking lot improvements. Recommendation: Staff believes that the proposed garage, trash enclosure, labyrinth, and other repair and upgrading projects for the west and east parking lots and sidewalks, represent a desirable upgrading of the existing church facility. Further, staff believes that the establishment, maintenance, and operation of the uses and form of development proposed by the Applicant meet the findings for the granting of a conditional use permit: 1. Will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be_ detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, and general welfare; 2. Will not cause undue traffic hazards, congestion, or parking shortages; 3. Will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment, or decrease the value, of other property in the vicinity, and will not be a nuisance; 4. Will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of other property in the vicinity; 5. Will not create an excessive burden on parks, streets, and other public facilities; 6. Conforms to the applicable restrictions and special conditions of the district in which it is located; and 7. Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the proposed amendment to the existing Conditional Use Permit, including the requested variance. Conditions for approval are: 1. Staff approval of final landscape plan and schedule of plantings. 2. Applicant obtains a Watershed District permit. A-T S_ & ARMSTRONG TORSETH SKOLD & RYDEEN INC June 7, 2006 Planning Commission Members and Council Members 4801 West Fiftieth Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: The Church of St. Patrick — Renewal of Conditional Use Permit Dear Commissioners and Council Members, On behalf of The Church of Patrick I would like to request that you consider for approval the attached application for Condition Use Permit. IMPROVEMENTS The church is planning to improve its facilities through several projects on a portion of the site south of the church, the existing parking lots and at the northeast entrance to the classroom wing. 1. Vehicle Storage Garage (on existing foundation walls) The primary improvement is to build a vehicle storage garage for the automobiles which are owned by the church and which are currently stored at the south end of the parking lot, unprotected. The proposed garage has been designed to utilize the existing concrete foundation, which was originally used to screen three large fuel tanks in a semi- sunken enclosure. Please refer to the site plan and aerial photographs for the location of the proposed garage. The structure has 12" thick cast -in -place concrete walls which have been determined to be capable of supporting the vehicles and garage structure. In addition Clark Engineering Inc., Structural Engineers (St. Louis Park, MN) has verified the capacity of the soils to carry the weight. The structure has been designed to be residential in nature, and use materials that are present in the existing church (red brick with white trim). The roof will be of a four hip design with shingles. Please refer to the attached computer images which illustrate the design and character of the proposed garage. The existing concrete structure will be ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING - TECHNOLOGY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN 8 5 0 1 G O L D E N V A L L E Y R 0 A D 5 U I T E 3 0 0 M I N N E A P O L I S M I N N E S O T A 5 5 4 2 7 PHONE 763 . 545. 3731 763 . 525 . 3289 FAX Church of St. Patrick Conditional Use Permit Application June 7, 2006 Page 2 of: 4 modified to allow placement of 12" thick precast concrete planks over the walls, to create the garage floor. The location of the existing structure is 9.6 ft. from the south and west property corner, which is inside the normal 50 ft setback for a new structure of this type in this zoning district. The church believes that by building the garage over the existing foundation walls it can utilize the concrete foundation and at the same time mitigate what is currently an attractive nuisance. Please refer to the attached photographs of the existing structure which show these conditions 2. Trash Enclosure Currently the church has three large dumpsters, (see photographs) which it would like to contain in a new trash enclosure which would be built adjacent to the new garage, but not connected to the garage. The new trash enclosure will be constructed of brick with gates made of a steel frame and composite boards (wood and plastic) of colors to match the church and garage. 3. Labyrinth The church is currently working with a labyrinth designer to develop a labyrinth on the lower area of the site directly east of the proposed garage. At this time the materials for the labyrinth have not been determined, but typically the materials are brick, stone . pavers, or crushed rock are used for the pathways and grass or ground cover infill the spaces between the walkways. Additional landscaping, including trees and shrubs, will be. added to better define the labyrinth area and to screen the garage facility from view of the labyrinth. Access to the labyrinth will be by a simple concrete stairway. A bituminous pathway, which will provide an accessible route (5 % grade) to the labyrinth and the lower storage facility, (located under the vehicle storage garage). 4. Parking lot improvements The church will be repairing and resurfacing the east and west parking lots. Repairs will include demolish of as much of the paved surface as is required to bring the underlying soil structure to correct bearing capacity, then the lots will be top dressed and restriped. 5. Northeast sidewalk modifications Church of St. Patrick Conditional Use Permit Application June 7, 2006 Page 3 of: 4 A small section of sidewalk will be added from the eastern church entrance to the north - south sidewalk which leads from the parking lot to the administrative entrance (classroom wing). CONSIDERATIONS The church has designed these projects with the intention that the proposed improvements will benefit the church and surrounding neighborhood by: 1. Eliminating the attractive nuisance which currently exists with the old fuel storage facility, and replace it with an enclosed and secure place to store church vehicles. The new facility will'also remove the vehicles from sight of potential vandals. 2. Locating the garage facility in place which will not cause traffic congestion or eliminate valuable parking spaces. 3. Removing conditions which might be injurious to the use, or enjoyment of adjacent properties, and will certainly mitigate an existing nuisance. 4. Allowing for the normal development of other properties in the vicinity. 5. Creating a facility which will not place excessive burden on city facilities. It is the intent of the church that the new labyrinth will provide a more park -like experience for individuals desiring a quiet contemplative retreat and will be open to use by neighbors. ,6. Creating improvements that conform to all other applicable restrictions of this district, (with the exception of setback requirements). 7. Constructing improvements which are consistent with the City of Edina _Comprehensive Plan. No significant changes to the use of the property are proposed. TIME SCHEDULE The improvements illustrated here are intended to be completed, or begun, within a two year time period as required by the requirements of the Conditional Use Permit. GARAGE SETBACK The church respectfully requests that the Commission and Council consider a allowing the garage to be constructed inside the normal setback on the basis of the following arguments: 1. The existing foundation, which is proposed to be used as the foundation for the garage, is 9.6 ft from the property line. We believe that moving the existing structure Church of St. Patrick June 7, 2006 Conditional Use Permit Application Page 4 of. 4 would be an undo hardship which was not self - imposed. In addition, moving the structure would not be a mere inconvenience. 2. The conditions that exist are unique to this property. The Owner believes the new garage at this location will correct the current unsightly and somewhat hazardous conditions, while providing secure storage for the church vehicles. 3. These improvements maintain the property rights of adjacent land owners and other properties in the district. The existing conditions have existed from the time the church was built and the planned improvements will provide a more "neighborhood friendly" facility. 4. The design of the garage facility has been developed with the public welfare in mind. The church sincerely believes that this new structure will benefit the public welfare and will not injure other properties in the vicinity or zoning district . \Thank you for your consideration of this "renewal' of the existing Conditional Use Permit, we sincerely believe the improvements discussed here will benefit the neighborhood as well as provide for the needs of the church. Sincerely; Paul nyder AIA Project Architect (MN Lic. 14813) Cc: Father Gregory Welch, Pastor Ms. Sheryl Rose, Parish Administrator Mr. Michael Crowe, Construction Manager Mr. Robert Gunderson, ATS &R Landscape Architect Encl: Conditional Use Permit Application Legal Description of the property $700 Check Current Site Survey (Enviroscience, Inc.) Site Plan (ATS &R , Inc.) Site and Structure Photographs GROO TERS&A SSOCIA TES / ARCHUEC IS u IC- Aft, AV, Church of St. Patrick — Edina, Minnesota Figure 3 — Existing Structure Looking East Figure 4 — Existing Structure Looking South S' �'= J', � ±' ♦. .� `, ��� ... � 3x x.r17, AII- 11 ml'n¢ is A! `r k 1� I ir�l ttt ir�l "oe Or 7:1 LJ Vehicle Storage Garage ' s T"OPP r ry "law i1 Vehicle Storage Garage o e J .�y REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor Hovland and Members of the City Council FROM: John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: July 18, 2006 AGENDA ITEM: IV. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Courtney Fields Shelter Building and Baseball Field Compan y 1. Rachel Contracting 2. Meisinger Construction 3. CM Construction RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Rachel Contracting $828,463.00 Amount of Ouote or Bid 1. $828,463.00 2. $887,800.00 3. $926,800.00 Account #47041.6710 & 4702.6710 GENERAL INFORMATION: On Wednesday, June 28, 2006, bids were opened for the renovation of the Courtney Fields shelter building and baseball field #4. Three bids were received: Contractor: Rachel Contracting Meisinger Construction CM Construction Base Bid: $809,963.00 $855,000.00 $894,800.00 Alternate #1 18,500.00 32,800.00 32,000.00 Alternate #2 5,400.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 Alternate #3 4,200.00 5,300.00 6,000.00 Alternate #1 is and add - alternate for installation of underground utilities (sanitary sewer and water) across field #4 to serve the relocation and replacement of the Courtney Fields maintenance garage scheduled to be built in 2007. Alternate #2 is an add - alternate for the construction of a concrete plaza area on the north side of the Courtney Fields shelter building. Alternate #3 is an add - alternate for the installation of quart' tile flooring for the shelter building lobby area. Staff and the project consultants are recommending approval of the lowest bidder, Rachel Contracting, and accept alternate number one, installation of underground utilities to serve the future maintenance garage building. As directed by Council, staff hired the professional services of Anderson/Johnson Associates who teamed with Armstrong, Torseth, Skold and Rydeen, Inc. Architects and Engineers (ATS &R) to conduct a feasibility study for the renovation of the Courtney Fields shelter building. Anderson/ 2 Johnson and Associates was also the lead architect/engineering firm that designed and built the Van Valkenburg Park softball complex. The design input committee included Assistant Director Ed MacHolda, John Keprios, and three volunteers from the Edina Baseball Association; President Kathryn Peterson, and Chip Howard and Dave Engler. The architects' previous feasibility study showed that there is a substantial savings to retaining the existing exterior walls, plumbing walls, and electrical panel wall into the new design. There is a savings of close to $100,000 to use those existing walls in the new design versus total demolition and replace with new construction. At the January 17, 2006, meeting, the Council approved the 2006 Capital Improvement Plan which included $450,000 for upgrade of the Courtney Fields shelter building and $312,000 for renovation of field #4 at the Courtney Fields Baseball Complex. At that time, our consultants and staff believed we could bring this project from that concept design stage to a final design phase that would be within budget. In this case, the lowest bid came in substantially over the predicted budgeted amount. If awarded to Rachel Contracting as proposed by staff and consultants, total project costs would be: Base Bid $809,963.00 Alternate #1 18,500.00 Soft Costs 70,544.00 Seeding Contractor 6,000.00 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $905,007.00 Alternate #1 for $18,500 is being recommended by staff and consultants because it is a very good alternate bid price in our consultant's judgment, plus it would not be prudent to forgo this opportunity as a future installation because of the significant negative impact it would have on the newly renovated field number four. Staff recommends that the Council approve funding this alternate, which is actually a proposed 2007 CIP maintenance building project. Due to the unexpectedly high bid results, staff is not recommending acceptance of the other two add - alternates. In an effort to reduce the total project costs, our consultants have contacted the low bidder, Rachel Contracting, and has received written approval to agree to value engineering cost saving change orders in the amount of $70,140. None of these value engineering deduct change orders would be in violation of Building Codes and would not as a result require the building to have a fire suppression system. With the value engineering change orders, the total project costs are reduced from $905,007.00 down to $834,867. The CIP budget for this project is $762,000 which is $72,867 short of needed funds. Therefore, I propose that the additional funding come from other 2006 CIP projects that can be delayed: Renovation of Chowen Park Picnic Shelter $15,000 Upgrade Keyless Entry System 20,000 Renovate Key /Core Security System 14,000 France Avenue Off -leash Dog Area 30,000 TOTAL $79,000 In staff's opinion, the renovation of the Chowen Park picnic shelter and upgrade of the keyless entry system can wait until 2007. The renovation of the park system's key /core system can wait indefinitely at the risk of unwanted entries into park buildings by a small number of people who 3 possess lost or non - returned keys. The France Avenue off -leash dog area cannot be done in 2006 anyway because the City of Minneapolis has not yet granted access to their property yet for that proposed use. It is unsure when, if ever, access may be granted at this point. J also anticipate additional savings via a donation from the Edina Rotary Club who have offered to paint a portion of the building interior as a Rotary Club project. The delay in the above 2006 CIP projects brings the total budgeted dollars available for this project at: 2006 CIP Budget for Renovation of Shelter Building $450,000 2006 CIP Budget for Renovation of Field #4 312,000 Delay five other 2006 CIP budgeted projects (shown above) 79,000 TOTAL 2006 CIP BUDGETED DOLLARS $841,000 The total anticipated project costs are approximately $834,867. With value engineering change orders and delay of other budgeted 2006 CIP projects, we should be able to fund total project costs. If the Council approves the project, the building could be completed by the end of November 2006. The field and building demolition/construction process would begin July 24, 2006, which would allow enough time to get the newly graded little league baseball field seeded this fall. The field and building projects must be done together to allow for access to the facility. This construction schedule becomes the least disruptive for the baseball program season. Our consultants suggest that delaying the award of bid for another year would likely only result in higher costs due to inflation. Our consultants also suggest that there is virtually no other cost saving design measure that would significantly reduce the scope of this project without eliminating a proposed service or function that the building and field provide. The Edina Baseball Association has already compromised their 2006 baseball schedule to accommodate the construction schedule. If the project were delayed until 2007, EBA would have to compromise another season's schedule. Over the past 5 years the Edina Baseball Association has spent $73,611 on field improvements and maintenance related to the fields and concession area. Also over the past 5 years, Edina Baseball Association has paid $76,170 in Field Use Fees and an additional $25,486 for Tournament Field Fees. In total, the Edina Baseball Association has paid nearly $150,000 in support of Edina Park and Recreation Department baseball facilities that they use. Since the inception of the Courtney Fields Complex, the Edina Baseball Association has donated all proceeds from the concessions stand and scoreboard advertising to the City of Edina to support and improve baseball facilities. The Edina Baseball Association has agreed to formalize that practice in a written agreement. If the Council approves the low bid as proposed, the building would be complete by the end of November and Courtney Field #4 would be playable by mid - summer of 2007. Project Manager and Landscape Architect Roy Anderson and ATS &R Architect Tammy Magney will be present to explain value engineering change orders and answer questions. Edina Park and Recreation John K os, Director Department e not within budg ordon Hu , ty Manager This Recommended bid is within budget D.ezL. July 14, 2006 John Keprios Parks & Recreation. Department City of Edina 4801 West 50`" Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Dear John, ANDERSON - JOHNSON I ASSOCIATES, A INC. � S LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • SITE PLANNING • CIVIL ENGINEERING This letter outlines the Courtney Field project development history and suggestion to accept the low bidder. Please refer to the following: HISTORY Preliminary Building Project Cost Estimate (see attached) $413,849 Scope Increase During Construction Documents • Sliding window wall system + 25,000 • Concession cabinetry and islands + 5,000 • Low maintenance grand concrete block units in lobby (no painting required) + 4,000 • Ceramic tile walls throughout toilet rooms (no painting required) + 4,000 • Quarry tile floor in lobby + 4,200 Items Not Identified in Preliminary Estimate • Safety netting + 12,000 Site Work +250,000 Total Construction Estimate $726,049 BID Low bidder - Rachel Contracting bid of: $809,963 *(9% higher than construction estimate.) *It has been our experience that 2006 spring and summer estimates are 5 %, -10% higher than anticipated. REDUCTION SUGGESTIONS: The following deducts have been offered by the Low Bidder: 1. Revise steel trusses to wood $22,500 2. Omit east canopy $24,400 3. Omit frost foundation at dugout use thickened edge slab $7,100 4. Delete grand concrete masonry units, use regular concrete masonry units with epoxy paint $12,000 5. Delete SSPC #25 type 1 or 11 paint spec and use standard prime paint for all structure steel members $1,190 6. Delete galvanized finish on exterior stair, use standard prime painted material $2,100 7. Electrical modification 850 Total Suggested Reductions - $70,140 VALLEY SQUARE OFFICE CENTER • SUITE 200 • 7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD • MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55427 PHONE (763) 544 -7129 • FAx (763) 544 -0531 .- v ANDERSON - JOHNSON ASSOCIATES, INC. `A-V' SUGGESTED AWARD: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • SITE PLANNING • CIVIL ENGINEERIN We suggest you give positive consideration to awarding a contract to Rachel Construction. We have had positive experience working with Jerry Rachel of Rachel. Construction and find no cause to justify rejection. We suggest you award this contract for the $809,963.00 low bid with the understanding that the contract price will be reduced by change order an amount of $70,140. SUGGESTED ALTERNATE: Alternate No. 1: Water and Sanitary Service Extension: Add $18,500 This alternate is for extension of sanitary sewer and water service to a future maintenance facility. This is a very good alternate bid. In our judgement, it would be imprudent to forgo this oportunity as future installation would have a very disruptive impact of the Site. ATS &R Tammy Magney SSOCIA TES, 17VC VALLEY SQUARE OFFICE CENTER • SUITE 200 • 7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD • MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55427 PHONE (763) 544 -7129 • FAx (763) 544 -0531 o e C lase To: Mayor & City Council From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: July 18, 2006 Subject: Resolution Receiving Donations REPORT/RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item # V. A. Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends F-1 To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion Resolution Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Adopt Resolution. Info/Background: In order to comply with State Statutes all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the recipient departments for your consideration. There has been an addition to the donation resolution since your packet was sent to you. RESOLUTION NO. 2006-72 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA City of Edina WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Donation to the Edina Fire Department: William & Deidre Hedrick $50 David Byron Memorial Donations to the Edina Park and Recreation Department: Edina Crime Fund $5,000 Edina Community Foundation $3,841* Edina Community Foundation $5,000 ** *$2,000 for sponsoring the Centennial Lakes Park Sunday concert series and $1,841 Rosland Grant In -Aid Program **$5,000 not to be exceeded for three flag poles at Courtney Fields. Donations to the Edina Art Center as follows: Inna K. Hays $10 Laura Beth Landy $73 Jon C. Lord $10 Donation to City of Edina of various parcels in Parkwood Knolls from Parkwood Knolls Construction Company for use as storm water ponds. Dated: July 18, 2006 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 18, 2006 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and sea] of said City this day of . 20_. City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com 952C9r**-*861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 t1�TA, a� �4( I'M MEMORANDUM ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ' CITY OF EDINA DATE: July 13, 2006 TO: Gordon Hughes — City Manager FROM: Wayne Houle - City Engineer — . SUBJECT: Parkwood Knolls Land — Pond Donations Attached is a letter from Carl M. Hansen, President of Parkwood Knolls Construction Company regarding the donation of out lots to the City of Edina within the Parkwood Knolls neighborhood. These out lots are currently storm water ponds within the neighborhood, see attach map. Parkwood Knolls Construction Company will draft the proper documentation to transfer title for these properties, once the City Council accepts these donations. Engineering along with the Utility Department recommends accepting these donations. Jun 15 06 05:08P HHNSEN COMPANIES 9529129897 •? Parkwood Km'W Edina, nN 5 436 Edina, MN 65438 952 - 912.9895 Consftction Compimy 952- 912 -9897 fax June 15, 2006 Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Wayne: Attached are parcels of land owned by our company that we would like to donate to the City. PID#30 -117 21 -31 -0056 Market Value $100.00 PID#31 -117 21- 140033 Market Value $2500.00 PID#31- 117 -21 -12 -0031 Market Value $1800.00 PID#31- 117 -21- 13-0008 Market Value $1800.00 PID#31 -117 21 21 -0032 Market Value $2500.00 PID#31 -117 21- 14-0007 Market Value $2500.00 We would like to use these market values from the Hennepin County records. Sin ly, Carl M. Hansen President :rj :0T1 *Nor* o� e \�CORPOPST tees AGENDA ITEM V.B. SEA' HEARING DATE- 8/1/06 NEW INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE - EDINA GRILL Z No packet data ❑ Oral presentation ❑ Information coming owe \&N rode REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item V.C. From: GORDON L. HUGHES Consent ❑ CITY MANAGER Information Only ❑ Date: JULY l8, 2006 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: BIKEWAY TASK FORCE ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion RECOMMENDATION: Authorize staff to secure consulting services for the Bikeway Task Force. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND : On July 5a1, the City Council discussed the possibility of establishing a Bikeway Task Force for the purpose of preparing a comprehensive bikeway plan. The Council asked Mr. Steve Rusk, an Edina resident, to return at the July 18th meeting with additional thoughts concerning the mission of the task force as well as prospective members. The Council also asked that I share thoughts concerning staffing the task force. After reviewing this with my staff, I suggest that the Council authorize us to arrange for consulting services to assist the task force with its work. I believe that a consultant is the most appropriate staffing method for a number of reasons: First, this task force is very similar in concept and make up as the Affordable Housing Task Force, i.e. a task force that is self- appointing and responsible for crafting its own mission. In the case of the Affordable Housing Task Force, we concluded that it would be best served by assigning I an independent consultant to assist with this project rather than City staff. In retrospect, that was the correct decision for that task force and I believe it is the appropriate method. for the Bikeway Task Force. Second, our staff resources are stretched with comprehensive plan issues, traffic studies, construction projects and other efforts. We are also short - handed in the Planning Department. We simply would find it difficult to provide staff resources at the present time. Third, in my opinion, the City would be best - served in reserving staff involvement until the task force has completed its work. We can then spend our effort on the implementation program as well as integrating the task force's recommendations into the comprehensive plan. As with the Affordable Housing Task Force, we would assist the Bikeway Task Force in securing consulting services. I anticipate that task force members would be responsible for interviewing prospective consultants and recommending their choice. I cannot estimate the cost of such consulting services at the present time. We will advise the Council of expected costs after the task force refines its scope of work. BIKE EDINA r +,- FORCE Purpose — produce a Comprehensive Bike Plan for Edina. Scope - • Consider the needs for A — advanced riders, B — average and C — Novice skilled riders; that are commuters, athletic /exercise, recreational, social, children riding to school and shoppers. • Address connectivity to other surrounding communities and trails. • Coordinate plan with Hennepin County and Three Rivers Park District (3RPD) plans. • Integrate all ongoing bike issues • Explore Test programs with other agencies (3RPD, Mn /DOT, etc.) Goals - short term • Compete Route elements in time for '07 TAB and `07Non- motorized Transportation Pilot Project (NTP) to apply for grants. Time Frame — complete in 9 —12 months for complete plan - Proposed Plan Elements Route elements — Street Inventory / Inventory of conditions — This is a key element that allows an understanding of current conditions from a cycling perspective. Attractors — Defining attractors /destination locations that cyclists currently or wish to cycle to, help to set priority in the development of routes. Define needed routes — • Safe Routes to Schools — ■ Community Routes — ■ Connectors to other municipalities — Estimate route costs — Mn /DOT website can produce estimates for prioritization Produce prioritized route need list. Policy elements — ■ The Rationale for non - motorized transportation planning ■ Bicycle planning process ■ Defining users ■ Deterrents to cycling ■ Increasing usage of cycles for transportation. Define BE Task force.doc Page 1 of 4 BIKE EDINA c TASK FORCE Management elements ■ Administration ■ Pubic participation — define long term input • Promotion — of infrastructure • Encouragement — use of bikes trails • Information — provide knowledge for use of bikes and routes • Coordination with other municipalities • Commuter Elements — • Skills and Equipment Education • . Employer Education /Promotion • Training Education /Safety (Risk) elements — • Education programs (cyclist, pedestrian and motorist) • Maps of Routes for residents. • Enforcement • Accident reporting ■ Regulations(State and Local) Network design elements --- thane- pa-th-and -route standards • Federal • AASHTO • Mn /DOT • Local requirements Parking elements — are defined parking standards that have extreme impact on cycling usage. Transit elements — define how cycling integrates as a formal transit element, would address transit stations for high volume destinations. . Maintenance elements — defines a local municipalities maintenance philosophy toward the defined cycling infrastructure. Funding — • Develop Grant writing skills and information • Determine Grant sources • Match Needs to Grants Task Force Staffing Define BE Task force.doc Page 2 of 4 . EDINA TASK FORCE We need to Communicate this Task Force to the public. Promotion of the Task Force will allow for quality staffing, increase public awareness and participation over all. To get this Task Force off the ground we need to utilize the Sun Current to publishing an interview or article that explains the purpose and scope of the Task Force. Ask for volunteers. Have them e-mail BikeEdina a,earthlink.net. Post the same information with forms at bike shops, coffee shops, Lund's, Jerry's and other community areas to inform public. Public Involvement Opportunities Help with — Street Inventory • Volunteers to ride possible bike routes • Record data Neighborhood Meetings and City wide Meetings. We need resident and non - resident comments and opinions on the following — Bike use ■ Obstacles to cycling ■ What would you like to know about cycling that would help you use your bike more. ■ What help /information would you like to help you commute to work Riding • Routes /Roads Used • Issues with riding, condition of road, signage, accessibility • Desired Routes (if you could create a new path) Attractors • Identify • Prioritize Task Force — • Voting body • That will be active for the complete 9 —12 month process Volunteer Form The Bike Edina Task Force needs citizen involvement. We need help from all levels of cyclists. We will publish a press release in the Sun Current, post flyers in bike shops, and high traffic business in Edina asking for volunteers. Please see attached Form Selection Committee I'm forming an ad hock selection committee that will review the applicants and provide the Mayor with a pool of qualified people that he can then appoint to the Task Force with Council approval. Define BE Task force doc Page 3 of 4 v o BIKE EDINA TASK FORCE At this time the Selection Committee is: Bob Kuntze Troy Jefferson - Former Edina Citizens' Safety Council participant regarding bicycle issues Dick Dekker _ Lee Ann Gustafson I have as of 4:30 pm Thursday July 13, 2006 received 5 e -mail contacts from very qualified people from today's Sun Current Bike Edina Task Force — Voting body 1. Chair / Cycling Expert 2. NW Citizen Representative 3. NE Citizen Representative 4. SW Citizen Representative 5. SE Citizen Representative 6. At Large Citizen Representative 7. At Large Citizen Representative 8. At Large Citizen Representative 9. At Large Citizen Representative 10. At Large Citizen Representative 11. Traffic Commission Representative? 12. City Council person? Internal and External Liaisons /Advisors that will assist on parts. 1. Edina Comprehensive Transportation Plan Coordinator - Heather Worthington? 2. City Engineer - Steve Lillehaug ?(Currently liaison to the Traffic Commission) 3. Public Safety /Police 4. Public Health? 5. Planning Commission 6. Mn /DOT A Representative from MN DOT Bicycling Area — Darryl Anderson MN DOT Bicycle Coordinator or Jim Dustrude, former MN DOT Bicycling Coordinator and currently Principal Transportation Strategist will be the one to assign someone to this task force if it is not one of them attending. 7. Three Rivers Park District A Representative from Three Rivers Park District — Del Miller, Intergovernmental Relations Administrator would recommend a person if he can not attend. 8. Safe Routes to School — a program sponsored federal government 9. Maintenance Department /Public Works 10. Park / Recreation 11. Communications 12. School Board 13. and. others Define BE Task force.doc Page 4 of 4 Name EDINA COMPREHENSIVE BIKE PLAN TASK FORCE - VOLUNTEER FORM Please compete the following form. Address Zip Code *Phone: Home E -mail Resident (number of years) Employment (firm and occupation /profession) Civil, professional, community activities Work Previous public Experience (Elective or Appointive) Education On the reverse or on additional paper please answer the following. 1) Why are you interested serving on the Bicycle Task Force? 2) Briefly list aspects of your skills /experiences that you believe quality you for this Task force. 3) In what capacity would you like to participate? ❑ - Steering Committee (9 -12 month time commitment) ❑ - Helping Coordinate Neighborhood Meetings (few, day commitment) ❑ - Attend Neighborhood meetings (evening commitment) ❑ - Help with Street Condition Inventory (few day commitment) ❑ - Other Date Signature Return completed form via e-mail to BikeEdina&earthlink.net , or mail to Steven Rusk, 5040 Hankerson Ave, Edina MN 55436. * Under the law, your telephone number is private data. If you are selected to serve, your telephone number(s) will be listed on the Task Force roster so other members of the Task Force, City officials and the public could contact you. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. BE Volunteer formdoc Page 1 of 1 ATTENTION EDINA BICYCLISTS... The Edina City Council has approved a Bicycling Task Force to. improve biking routes in Edina. VOLUNTEERS NEEDED! The Task Force will be headed by Steve Rusk, a bicycling expert from Edina. The group will be made up of volunteers recruited from all four quadrants of the city. The Task Force's main mission is to produce a Comprehensive Bike Plan.for Edina -- designing routes, improving the current conditions of current widely -used routes, interact with surrounding cities to plan routes that provide good bicycling connectivity and address the pro - .Posed Interlachen Blake Trail. Volunteers are needed to spend a few hours to attend meetings and help in planning, organizing and fact- finding. We are also looking for a few people to form a Task Force to oversee the planning process. The planning process will take about 9 -12 months. If you are interested in cycling and would like to make a positive impact on cycling routes in the City of Edina, please email us at BikeEdina@earthlink.net for more information or to request a volunteer form. CDMQ) CDmin coM0) comin oom!'n oomin oomin oomin Wmin ODm(,n LM: (D � (D a (D 7� °_: (D °: E and m00) m m� m m� m m� m m� MW m m� and m� n c� aaD� ° oo� ° oD� ° aD� ° aD� c�D aao� °=oo� ° oD� c`n ° oD� r,-L 001 N N m N N N N N 001 N N N N j� C ��X @�7C ��7C ��X ��7r @�7C ��7C ��7C ��7C @ 7C (D O (D 0a (D N (D 0a (D 01 (D 01 (D 01 (D 01 (D 01 (D 01 01 rya N y 0) rya 01 y 01 rya 0a (A N (p 0) rya O y d N =r -n ?T ?-n S-n ?-n ?-n 19 ?-n ?-n ?-n 5.0 O O O O 50 0 0 5 O O ?!rS ?r C-3 Fa ?Ir a Fa ?rd FC-3 a 0 O (0D 0 (0D 0 (D (D (D O (0D 0 N O (0D W (D m (D O I Page 1 of 1 Darlene Wallin From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 12:53 PM To: Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com Cc: Darlene Wallin Subject: FW: Message to the City Council Re: High rise development along France Avenue Jennifer Bennerotte Communications & Marketing Director City of Edina 952 - 833 -9520 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 Bennerotte@ci.edina.mn.us From: Lorenzo Tunesi [mailto:lorenzo.tunesi @gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 10:45 AM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: Re: Message to the City Council Re: High rise development along France Avenue Dear Members of the City Council, Thank you for your continued interest in bike paths in Edina. The creation of a Bikeway Task Force is a step in the right direction. Please keep moving in the direction of bike paths in Edina, they are an amenity that is sorely lacking in our city. Lorenzo Tunesi 4413 Ellsworth Drive Edina, MN 55435 7/18/2006 o e Cl) 0 �NC'OJ PO Sao REPORPRECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # V.D. From: CHERYL ENGELMAN Consent ❑ CITY SANITARIAN Information Only Date: July 18, 2006 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Above Ground ❑ Motion Swimming Pools ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion INFORMATION In 1979 the City Council adopted an ordinance prohibiting above ground swimming pools. This ordinance was reviewed by Council at the November 3, 2003, December 2, 2003 and March 1, 2004 Council meetings due to a variance request to allow above ground swimming pools. The variance request was denied and the ordinance remained unchanged. Pertinent excerpts from the minutes of these council meetings and staff reports are attached. City Code defines a swimming pool as any basin for holding water, designed for human use, and with a water depth greater than 24 inches. During the July 5, 2006 Council meeting, a resident, who recently received a correction letter to remove an above ground pool from their property, requested that the ordinance be changed to allow above ground pools. The resident indicated that new technology for above ground pools should be considered. Council requested staff to review current technology and report back. Staff from both health and building departments reviewed current technology of above ground swimming pools and found it unchanged from that reviewed by Council three years ago. If the Council wishes to reconsider City policies concerning above ground swimming pools, it should direct staff to prepare an ordinance amendment for Council consideration at a later date. Minutes/Edina City Council/November 3, 2003 Member Hovland commented he did not think that matching the sidewalk to the other side of the street was a concern and could work. Member Masica said the issue was child safety. She inquired about the installation of flashing lights at the intersection. Mr. Houle explained the City's crosswalk policy had recently been updated to include flashing lights at a couple locations in the City. The intersection would not meet warrants at this time for a flashing signal. Member Masica said the park at this time seems to be an attractive nuisance. Mr. Bongaarts voiced his concern with STOP signs at this location that so little traffic from Fox Meadow, that the STOP could not guarantee an expectation of safety. Bernie Beaver, 6225 Fox Meadow Lane, stated, 1) Blake Road was the longest stretch of road in Edina without STOP signs or lights and the fastest speeds, 2) Fox Meadow was only four cornered intersection on the subject stretch of Blake Road, 3) Blake Road rises immediately north of the intersection obstructing the view, 4) completion of the park has changed the semantics of the neighborhood with more people walking to the park, 5) favors sidewalks, which would encourage more pedestrian traffic, 6) installation of landscaping on intersection has improved sightlines, and 7) the person objecting to sidewalks in the area was no longer living in the neighborhood. Member Kelly stated there needed to be some uniformity with the warrant system wherever pedestrians are crossing to City parks and schools. Member Housh indicated a good 'first task' for the Transportation Committee would be to study the warrant system, specifically in the areas of City parks and schools. Alison Gregory, 6200 Fox Meadow Lane, submitted a letter dated October 21, 2003, stated a STOP sign at that location was not justified and will only increase traffic noise and become a nuisance. Member Hovland made a motion approving the Minutes of the October 6, 2003, Traffic Safety Staff Review Section A; B and C. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. Following a Council discussion, Member Hovland made a motion directing staff to study a pedestrian sidewalk on Blake Road and to connect Interlachen Boulevard to Parkwood Avenue on both sides of the street. Member Maetzold seconded the motion.. Ayes: Housh Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. APPEAL OF CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION UPHELD FOR ABOVE GROUND SWIMMING POOL (5601 MCGUIRE ROAD) Assistant Manager Anderson gave background into the complaint regarding the above ground swimming pool located at 5601 McGuire Road. Edina City Code specifically prohibits above ground pools with water depth over 24 inches. As a result of that complaint, Tim and Judy Chirpich were notified of the violation and given the option to appeal the violation with the Construction Board of Appeals. That information was incorrect direction to give the residents at 5601 McGuire Road. Mr. Anderson Page 7 M } �1 Minutes/Edina City Council/November 3, 2003 elaborated that the Construction Board of Appeals does not have the authority to grant a variance for this type of violation. The Construction Board of Appeals examines interpretations made by the sanitarian and building official, related to the City Code. Everyone was in agreement that the above ground pool at 5601 McGuire Road was not in compliance. Options available are, 1) deny the appeal and 2) after study of the existing ordinance, consider a change to the Code related to the soft sided pools. Gerald Robinson, neighbor of the Chirpich family, stated his belief that there was ambiguity in the Edina City Code. Attorney Gilligan explained the issue began with an appeal. process but the Construction Board of Appeals did not have jurisdiction. He recommended upholding the decision of the Board and denying the appeal. Mr. Gilligan added the Council could- decide to study this portion of the Code if they desired to do so. Mr. Robinson said he believed the Chirpichs were challenging the Code regarding pools as well as play structures, etc. that was passed in 1979, based upon aesthetics. Building Official Kirchman explained the Board directed a memorandum to the Council asking that the 1979 Ordinance be studied to see if changes were warranted. Member Hovland made a motion upholding the decision of the Construction Board of Appeals denying the variance allowing an above ground swimming pool that was specifically prohibited by the City Code. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. Mayor Maetzold inquired if the Council wanted the Code to be studied and the results reported back to the Council at a later date. He explained the process to be followed would be, 1) staff studying the issue, 2) reporting results of the study to the Council with recommendations, 3) publish the issue, and 4) set a public hearing for resident comments at a Council meeting. Member Masica asked if the 1979 Code regarding above ground pools was based on aesthetics or safety issues. Mr. Kirchman explained no verbatim minutes existed from 1979. However, several staff members recalled an incident precipitating the Ordinance, which was purely aesthetics. Chief Scheerer said the Fire Department does consider pools of this type a risk and a safety concern if a rescue was needed. DepaztmTktHtaff added it would be below ground pools from to step over the side where there was a large stable area to and into a pool with an unknown depth. Member Housh queried if pools of this type were acceptable in other communities. Member Hovland voiced concern with, 1) how do you keep the water clean, 2) how do you get rid of the water, 3) how are little neighborhood children kept out, and 4) how do little children get out of the pool. Mr. Anderson reminded the Council that the concern was complaint driven. Mayor Maetzold suggested further discussions and study of the Ordinance on the use of above ground pools. Pnap R _ Jrt Minutes/Edina City Council/November 3, 2003 Member Kelly said he personally would not have staff study the issue. He voiced concern with, 1) no fencing, 2) small children in the neighborhood, 3) night time safety, and 4) water quality. He stated he would not be in favor of changing the ordinance. Member Masica said information she was provided in the packet stated that the pool was designed to be filled to a maximum level of 30 inches. Member Hovland said the Ordinance has not been studied for 25 years and staff should study the local and standards nation -wide for above ground pools. Mr. Anderson said staff would study the issue and report back to Council with their findings and recommendations. APPEAL OF CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION UPHELD FOR SWIMMING POOL LADDER Mr. Kirchman explained when a final inspection was completed for the in- ground pool at 6301 South Knoll Drive, it was noted that no ladder was installed in the pool. The homeowners were sent a letter dated July. 29, 2002, of this violation stating: 'The swimming pool must have two means of egress from the pool. Steps may be used in the shallow end of the pool. A ladder with handrails must be located at the deep end of the pool ". Mr. Kirchman reported the homeowners, David and Connie Brockway, appealed this decision with the Construction Board of Appeals. He concluded the Construction Board of Appeals recommended upholding the denial of the request for the deletion of an egress ladder in the deep end of the applicant's swimming pool. Member Masica asked if the ladder was noted during the course of the plan review and brought to the attention of the pool builder. Mr. Kirchman said yes the builder, Quality Pools, was familiar in with Edina Ordinances. Connie Brockway, 6301 South Knoll Drive, explained the.pool was completed in June 2003. Upon final inspection was the first time installation of a ladder was mentioned to them or the builder about a ladder being necessary. Installing a ladder now would be very expensive. She added that money and aesthetics were not a substitute for safety. They polled surrounding cities and Bloomington was the only polled city that required a ladder or a swim -out from the deep end of the pool. Ms. Brockway said an internet search of the whole country was completed and the most restrictive codes required either a ladder, a swim -out or a projecting bull-nose around the pools perimeter. She concluded that if they had known a ladder was a requirement, they would have installed one. Member Kelly stated there would be no financial consequence to the homeowners, but the builder would be responsible. He suggested the City notice the builder about the violation and subsequent necessity of a ladder. Mr. Anderson stated that staff would notice the builder of the requirement. David Brockway, 6301 South Knoll Drive, suggested studying the ladder issue when the City Code was studied about above ground, soft -sided pools. Mr. Kirchman added that a ladder in the deep end of a pool was a rescue aid in case of emergencies. Page 9 r r Minutes/Edina City Council/November 3, 2003 Member Hovland made a motion to deny the appeal requesting the deletion of an egress ladder in the deep end of applicant's swimming pool. Member Kelly seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. APPROVE AUTHORIZATION OF STATE OF MINNESOTA GRANT CONTRACT FOR DOMESTIC PREPAREDNESS TRAINING Member Masica asked that the Authorization of State of Minnesota Grant Contract for Domestic Preparedness Training be removed from the Consent Agenda for further information. Member Masica inquired whether this was the first phase of the grant and just a tabletop exercise. Chief Siitari responded that this grant informs first line supervisors about the ability to format strategies. Member Masica made a motion approving the grant contract between the State of Minnesota, Division of Emergency, Management, and the City of Edina for Domestic Preparedness Training Funds. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Member Masica made a motion and Member Hovland seconded the motion approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated October 22, 2003, and consisting of 25 pages: General Fund $66,349.44; Communications Fund $11,664.23; Working Capital Fund $964,262.53; Construction Fund $1,522.68; Art Center Fund $3,172.36; Golf Course Fund $22,040.86; Ice Arena Fund $935.02; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $7,773.00; Liquor Fund $168,070.94; Utility Fund $32,221.61; Storm Sewer Fund $4,110.56; PSTF Agency Fund $23,323.01; TOTAL $1,305,446.24; and for approval of payment of claims dated October 29, 2003, and consisting of 30 pages: General Fund $318,638.04; CDBG Fund $2,746.00; Communications Fund $10,473.47; Working Capital Fund $196,890.17; Construction Fund $2,226.80; Art Center. Fund $22,498.63; Aquatic Center ($114.49); Golf Course Fund $2,811.80; Ice Arena Fund $4,153.28; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $9,449.88; Liquor Fund $117,057.96; Utility Fund $316,764.05; Storm Sewer Fund $22,314.27; PSTF Agency Fund $234,225.13; TOTAL $1,260,134.89. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. COMMUNICATION RECEIVED Mayor Maetzold explained that recently, a letter, dated October 24, 2003, was received from James A. Vose, 4529 Casco Avenue relating to a sewer back- up that occurred last July. Manager Hughes drafted a letter in response to Mr. Vose. Council consensus was that the draft letter depicted the City's reasoning and should be submitted to Mr. Vose. No formal Council action was taken. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Maetzold declared the meeting adjourned at 9:50 P.M. City Clerk Pa oP 10 L` .ne�c. 2, 2003 Edina City Council Meeting Minutes Page 7 of 20 appointed to serve on the Commission at their next meeting. Mayor Maetzold made a motion appointing the previously slate of candidates to the Transportation Commission for terms as presented. Member Kelly seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT - YORKDALE SHOPPES PARTNERSLCITY OF EDINA, APPROVED Manager Hughes indicted in 1996, the City and Yorkdale Shoppes Partners entered into a Reciprocal Easement Agreement with respect to the construction the new York Avenue Liquor Store, Cub Store and Retail Center, located to the south of the Cub Store. The Easement Agreement provided that no restaurant could be located in the retail center that sold alcoholic beverages. The restriction was imposed by the private interest in the Easement Agreement, not the City of Edina. Yorkdale Shoppes Partners is now requesting that the City consent to an amendment removing the above noted restriction. This amendment is requested to allow Chipotle, a new restaurant in the retail center, to be eligible for a liquor license. The City of Edina did not require the subject restriction at the time the Agreement was negotiated, there is no reason why the requested amendment should not be approved. Following a brief Council exchange, Member Kelly made a motion authorizing execution of the Reciprocal Easement Agreement by and between Yorkdale Shoppes Partners, LLC and the City of Edina, with respect to construction of the new York Avenue Liquor Store, Cub Store and Retail Center, located south of the Cub Store. Member Hovland seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. REPORT PRESENTED ON RESIDENTIAL SWIMMING POOLS Sanitarian Velde explained at the November 3, 2003, Council meeting, two appeals were heard from the Edina Residential Swimming Pool Code; 1) denial of a variance from the Construction Board of Appeals allowing an above ground swimming pool; and 2) denial of variance allowing a "swim -out" as a means of egress from the deep end of a swimming pool in lieu of a .ladder. The Council denied the appeal for the above ground swimming pool on the basis that the appeal to the Construction Board of Appeals was improper and should not have gone before the Council. In addition, the Council denied the appeal of a variance for the swim -out in lieu of a ladder. Mr. Velde said the Council directed staff to review both appeals and report back to the Council to consider amending the Code on both matters. The Council requested specific information on 1) definition of a swimming pool; 2) safety; 3) aesthetics; 4) sanitation; and 5) rescue. Surrounding cities do not have as stringent regulations on residential pools as does Edina. Bloomington has the most similar regulations of the cities surveyed. The remaining communities regulate the location of the pool and require four foot high fencing as a barrier around the pool but do not regulate the design or construction of residential swimming pools. Edina City Code defines a swimming pool as "any basin for holding water, designed for human use, http: / /www.ci. edina. mn. us / Pages/ CityCouncil _Meetingminutes /20031202Reg.htm 7/10/2006 Dec. 2, 2003 Edina City Council Meeting Minutes Page 8 of 20 • with a water depth greater than 24 inches". Surrounding communities and the National Spa and Pool Institute (NSPI) Model Code includes a water depth greater than 24 inches as a basis for their definition of a swimming pool. Safe - Hopkins does not require fencing around residential swimming pools. NSPI addresses fencing as an option. Deckin - Edina and Bloomington require decking. NSPI model codes address decking as an option. Egress - Edina, Bloomington and Minneapolis require a means of egress from the deep end of pools. NSPI model codes address a means of egress from the deep end of the pool, such as; 1) ladder with handrails, 2) swim -out, 3) underwater seats and benches, 4) mechanical lifts; and 5) any other design providing egress. Sanitation - Edina and Bloomington require a circulation system. Rescue - Code requires a four -foot wide deck around the perimeter of a pool for accessibility to perform emergency procedures and store backboards and a gurney. Above Ground Swimming Pools - Edina's Code prohibits above ground pools. NSPI defines an above ground pool as "a removable pool that has a minimum depth of thirty-six inches (36 ") and a maximum water depth of forty-eight inches (48 ") at the wall". NSPI model code requires, 1) same circulation system, 2) water depth between 24 and 36 inches, and 3) provide same level of safety and sanitation as in- ground pools. Mr. Velde elaborated that above - ground pools pose same risk for children 0 - 4 years as in- ground pools. Mr. Velde concluded that provision for a swim -out at the deep end of the swimming pool in lieu of a ladder is allowed in NSPI model codes. Neighboring communities do not require a ladder at the deep end of the pool and based upon the information gathered regarding the issue, it would seem appropriate to allow other forms of egress from the deep end of swimming pools. Above ground swimming pools that meet the model code set forth in the NSPI standards would meet the safety and sanitation requirement set forth for in- ground swimming pools. The need for a deck around the perimeter of the above ground swimming pool is warranted for safety and rescue purposes. This would add to the mass of the above ground swimming pool and may have an impact on the lot coverage of a residential property. Staff recommends the following actions: 1. Amend City Code Section 450 regulating residential swimming pools to include swim - outs, underwater benches and seats as a means of egress from the deep end of the swimming pool. 2. Seek input from the public whether to amend the City Code to allow above ground swimming pools with a water depth of 36 inches or greater. 3. Not allow the use of above ground swimming pools that have a design water depth between 24 inches and 36 inches due to the lack of model standards for the design and construction of such pools. 4. Consider amending City Code Section 450 by reducing the requirement for a continuous deck around the perimeter of the swimming pool thereby allowing the installation of a "vanishing edge" feature on a swimming pool. Consideration may also be given to adopting less regulation for residential swimming pools. The Dec. 2, 2003 Edina City Council Meeting Minutes Page 9 of 20 minimum requirements should include fencing around the swimming pool and a building permit ensuring that the proposed pool meets the setback requirements set forth in the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Housh asked what NSPI stands for, and voiced concern that it is a mechanism to help contractors. Mr. Velde said NSPI is the Nation Spa and Pool Institute and may be a trade organization but their model codes incorporate all the features found in the Edina Pool Ordinance. Mr. Housh inquired if communities that were surveyed had recently amended their ordinances regarding pools. Mr. Velde noted that that was not made clear with the survey but Edina historically has had a large number of pools for many years while other communities have not had the interest in regulating them as closely as we do. Mr. Housh said a swim out should be readily recognizable for a person having a problem in the pool. Mr. Hovland inquired whether Edina regulates what size a pool might be. Mr. Velde responded that when a diving board is included in the pool, there are stringent rules. Mr. Hovland indicated concern that pools have enough swim outs for persons who might have a problem. Mr. Velde said current Code states if the pool is over 30 feet wide, two means of egress are required in the deep end. Mr. Kelly said having a swim -out in the deep end of the pool is fine but he believes it is easier to see a ladder. He inquired whether there is a compelling reason to change the ordinance. Ms. Masica suggested more information be obtained before a decision is made. She asked how fencing is installed around a vanishing edge pool. Mr. Velde said fencing would surround the entire pool. Mr. Hughes suggested preparing an amendment dealing with the vanishing edge pool and the swim - out /ladder issue in residential pools. The above ground pool issue would not be a part of the amendment. No formal Council action was taken. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Member Hovland made a motion and Member Housh seconded the motion approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated November 19, 2003, and consisting of 29 pages: General Fund $176,834.92, Communications Fund $3,246.62; Working Capital Fund $1,088,644.43; Construction Fund $78,043.83, Art Center Fund $2,161.68; Golf Dome Fund $6,670.98; Aquatic Center Fund $1,309.39; Golf Course Fund 8,639.75$; Ice Arena Fund $27,129.97; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $24,265.61; Liquor Fund $139,524.04; Utility Fund $352,135.90, Storm Sewer Fund $9,913.66; PSTF Agency Fund $935.35; TOTAL $1,919,456.13; and for approval of payment of claims dated November 25, 2003, consisting of 29 pages: General Fund $161,240.95; Communication Fund $2,964.22; Working Capital Fund $120,251.88; Art Center Fund $25,255.11; Golf Dome Fund $218.11; Aquatic Center Fund $1,701.00, Golf Course Fund $2,688.90; Ice Arena Fund $470.85; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $6,523.18; Liquor Fund $149,926.24; Utility Fund $40,456.49; PSTF Agency Fund $642.80; TOTAL $512,339.73. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. FIRST READING GRANTED FOR ORDINANCE NO. 2003-13 - AMENDING CODE SECTION 185 INCREASING CERTAIN FEES Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Mr. Hughes noted that Ordinance No. 2003 -13 proposed an increase in on -sale liquor fees, thereby requiring a public hearing. http: / /www.ci. edina. mn. us / Pages/ CityCouncil _MeetingMinutes /20031202Reg.htm 7/10/2006 March 1, 2004 Edina laity Council Meeting minutes I rage i of i FIRST READING GRANTED TO ORDINANCE NO. 2004-M - AMENDING EDINA CODE SECTION 450 - RESIDENTIAL SWIMMING POOLS Community Health Administrator Velde explained at the December 2, 2003, regular Council meeting, staff recommended amending the current City Code regulating residential swimming pools. He said the amendment would allow the use of a swimout or a bench as a means of egress from residential swimming pools and would allow for a reduction in the required deck around the residential swimming pool thereby permitting certain special features such as a vanishing edge pool or a waterfall. Mr. Velde explained Section 1 of the proposed amendment defined underwater seats, benches and swimouts. Section 2 of the proposed amendment would allow the application of a "vanishing edge" or waterfall along a maximum of 15 feet of the required deck, or one entire side of the swimming pool if the maximum depth of the residential swimming pool did not exceed 54 inches. Section 3 of the proposed amendment would allow the installation of swimouts, seats or benches, which were visually set apart, as a means of egress from a swimming pool in lieu of a ladder. Mr. Velde said the proposed amendment would not change the prohibition on above ground swimming pools in Edina. He recommended granting First Reading to Ordinance No. 2004 -01, amending Code Section 450 regulating residential swimming pools. Member Hovland asked if requiring a non -slip material to be used in the swimout was given consideration. Mr. Velde noted that the ordinance stated that the swimout must be visually 'set apart'. Member Masica asked how the 15 -foot maximum for the vanishing edge had been set. Mr. Velde explained a 15 -foot vanishing edge should allow rescuers to help swimmers in trouble in front of that vanishing edge because shepherd's poles were 12 feet long. Ms. Masica asked if a handrail was required on pool steps. Mr. Velde replied a handrail was not required on the shallow end of the pool. Member Housh asked if surrounding communities have as stringent rules for pools as Edina. Mr. Velde said Edina's rules were more extensive. Barry Cart, 4208 Branson Street, inquired about research on water depth as well as the length of the diving well. Mr. Velde said the City Code has minimum distances from the diving wall out to the deep point as well as a specific distance from the deep point to the first transition and then back up to the shallow end. The model was taken from the National Spa and Pool Institute (NSPI). Member Kelly made a motion granting First Reading to Ordinance No. 2004 -01, amending Code Section 450 regulating residential swimming pools. Member Housh seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. http: / /www.ci. edina. mn. us / Pages /CityCouncil_MeetingMinutes /20040301 Reg.htm 7/10/2006 REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Steve A. Kirchman Building Official Date: October 29, 2003 Subject: Discussion of City ordinance prohibiting above - ground swimming pools. Tim and Judy Chirpich. 5601 McGuire Rd. Recommendation: Agenda Item # Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends Action 0 LJ To HRA ® To Council ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ® Discussion Staff recommends City Code prohibition on above - ground swimming pools remain unchanged. Other referenced play structures are a separate issue. Info /Background: The Construction Board of Appeals decided they didn't have the authority to grant a variance allowing an above - ground swimming pool that is specifically prohibited by the City Code. The attached memorandum from the City attorney supports the Board's position. The Board expressed concern that the ordinance prohibiting above - ground pools has not been reviewed since it passage in 1979, and requests the City Council review and discuss the ordinance. Attachments: 10/10/02 appeal letter with submitted pictures 8/25/03 staff report with 8/19/03 Sanitarian memo and pictures 9/3/03 Construction Board of Appeals meeting minutes 9/29/03 staff report with 9/5/03 Fire Chief memo 9/29/03 Construction Board of Appeals meeting minutes 10/23/03 Construction Board of Appeals memo 10/24/03 City Attorney memo Neighbor responses(2) ECC 450.06, Subd. 11 G:\ ConstBd WppealsXBD03- 006,CBA03-01,5601 McGuireMSURpt -mundl rw Pete and Judy Chirpich 5601 McGuire Road Edina, MN 55439 October 10, 2003 Debra Mangen, City Clerk City of Edina 4801 West 50" Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Construction Board of Appeals File # CBA03 -01 Dear Ms. Mangen: �O C1011IN CO- S4e4� C'l� °er I. 2003 BYSx �� y�O We are appealing the Construction Board of Appeal's ( "CBA ") decision dated September 30, 2003, denying a variance to city code #450.06 regarding above ground swimming pools. Overview This case addresses the acceptability of a toddler pool purchased at a Target store in Edina. The pool is soft - sided, 18' in diameter, 25.5" deep, holding approximately 4,000 gallons of water which is passed through a continuously running filter. Edina Code #450.06 prohibits any above ground pool that is 24" deep or greater. The code does not prohibit, limit the size of, or in any other way regulate above ground pools that are less than 24" deep. In short, this case is about 1.5" of water. Please take a moment to read the copy of my original letter of appeal to the CBA regarding this issue. (Exhibit A) Aesthetics The ordinance prohibiting above ground swimming pools was adopted back in 1979 for purely aesthetic reasons as stated in David Velde's memorandum to the CBA, dated August 19, 2003. (Exhibit B) "Aesthetically appealing" is tied to a community's values and meant something different in 1979 than what we consider now. Edina residents strive to give opportunities for children to succeed, and one way to support this is to start them off with recreational equipment that builds this confidence. This is why we now see large trampolines and towering play sets in backyards all over the city. I have enclosed photos (Exhibits C1 -C6) which were recently taken within a one mile radius of our home showing such large trampolines and play structures that also would have been considered aesthetically unappealing back in 1979. We believe that our toddler pool is no more unsightly than the towering play sets or trampolines which have proliferated in recent years. Now, consumer demand has led to the introduction of these soft -sided toddler pools which are large enough for kids to gain confidence in the water, not just cool off on a hot day. For example, in a period of less than six weeks, our five year old son went from scared of the water to full submersion and a total comfort level. This progress has shown in up in his swimming lessons taken at the Edina Community Center. Our son now lives for his pool. The appealing nature of the pool is also reflected by the draw it has become for family, friends and neighboring children with whom we frequently shared it. In short, aesthetically appealing no longer exists as a valid reason to not allow these toddler pools. As our culture changes and our desire to entertain and provide stimulating activities for our children in our own back yards changes, we need to update this code to accept and permit these off the shelf toddler pools in Edina. Health and Safety. At our first meeting with the Board on September 3, 2003, a majority of the members agreed that the prohibition of these types of toddler pools was outdated and needed to be revised; taking into consideration the health and safety issues that goes along with any pool use. One of the main concerns raised by the members was whether there would be a challenge posed to fire personal conducting a rescue from a pool of this kind. I have enclosed a picture of my son and me in our pool that clearly shows the ease of entering the pool without use of any impeding ladder or steps. (Exhibit D1 -D2) I am 5'4" and can easily get in or out of the pool without any problems. Our family is no againsf safety re�ulatimg thm woutd-inchrde -fences- o"hemical tracking in order to keep our children safe. We were not looking for a variance regarding this pool ordinance. We are requesting a city code change that would include some parameters that would allow these pools with appropriate safety and health regulations. We feel very strongly that a revision to this code section be considered. Respectfully, 7u and Pete Chirpich Edina Residents Attachments 2 .G C •^�.v t L-¢, (,,•i'�. fry. ♦ • t•�� !fi • ✓ ` j van- �t sj: }'` V }`_ : t.'.`,✓1� f_ "!t r r' f i4 V:%4 • j Lv� 3.l �}1:T � .aS 1-iV Al I ALUM ' j r d',''i ".ru�V�'�i"i� •• :+ `s �e,r`t � w.• 'ir . . �7 ..' •�.ii. �.v '{'��� ;•.s Cam: �ti�. 4.. • ,!'•. � ."; • � � � -drill � .� -1+� } - i 111S t• ln••, '% `[ 4 � t � _ --i �� amiss � -- I ` - � _ - 4 ` . .1 .F-• - .r`r'- .K+acP4I- Awannntu , t'! a Ik 6.. t 44 _17 a 7#ff . . . . . 'Put , F44 ly . . . . . . . . . . . . ------------- swam WIN `VV •r. ,•yj *+sr, t7 - vN �i .fix f `; 1.� �' •�. .�.. w� �� �I iii. '� ;! r Rye g - " -• � `l. . .. Z'.i� .f• _ 4r43 4 �« ; i )<lje� � •`i �:' f ,�X�1. � ' , '�& Ii 1i /(1 � r( 1(: i l�r i . � � {j!9 r .. 1 ~ ''..'• i •�.�.• +' {{••4 ; ti I, •, •may • '1 '�'�' ;��L ` i�.11�7111 ��dlN.0 � � � .. '_f r. r t� r '` 1 ��• � � l ���r, j - •7� q��14j1 .rf. -' •T.,q���tEEk��'s` �« r � .7 .. !Y '� ��"t... � �'' �'� :` �iL• 4i.L•'t� 6Z•'�lQL'r� Pia•' i _. _ .1- .n }i .jam �h._. i - w,'` '1�� "rlL. 406 -14 4r AN -fh '�' 44 P o p, M Z;. IVY., fv IS Mo. A I , ,r f a.�;.'r�' ^; LFif { •rte � ..� Ci4, - S A1I•�r7''� •J � ,: �'+ . >� � - , t � ca - ,,nom � .k • , � �. jo WINE !•. ,� cM�'' ^r .. , �.:%.*�r±'t,,�•y'�`- yam.. � r�r. Y• .� , z i il•': 1♦,(} }/(Y4 P"- � il !� #j�y;y��'t s5tlf� - � . ` � 7 .€� �- .5+t "�rxT `i� �J[ y I �„r 4!a�y: is'• 1 .mss _ �i4r�lck•..t 3.ef!-,f�iK � ����. ~,S��k�� � 4 r[ . - - __.-_- _..-t 4... .. .....�.�+..v.JiJNf �r w�R :�•l �-.d.r scams v,.. ___P.� i:�? �. 3L L �1 '� fir. .• •'•. ��� • .1j� �:� . a � � �''` _ Wit' � - � ,` •i 1 '.k i v� •` lk `'!�s�• '�� {'tom M y - ,T � f - • �W4 - +Y.1.+rs -t .., • HMV 3.5 - f 4 'A •'� _ .art. ✓ �'� t iT- : i _ � _ -Z _�� 4 -til �1 �.� x. t.��-t,t '�.�..- vi{ rt-ONNI fr ilL i I 3 „4 a i a EDINA CONSTUCTION BOARD OF APPEALS STAFF REPORT August 25, 2003 Case number: CBA03 -01 Appellant: Pete and Judy Chirpich 5601 McGuire Road Lot 6, Block 6, La Buena Vista Request: Variance for above ground swimming pool Backstround An above ground pool was discovered in response to a complaint. The Health Department, , ,which regulates pools, notified the Chirpichs of the prohibitions against above ground pools and their appeal rights on 6/10/03 (enclosure #1). The City received the Chirpichs appeal on 7/9/03 (enclosure #2). Appeal notice was published, sent to all property owners within 200' of the subject property and sent to the Chirpichs on 8/13/03. Issues /Analysis Edina City Code, Section 450.06, Subd. 11, (enclosure #3) prohibits above ground pools. Because they are specifically prohibited, no regulations exist in the City Code governing safety or sanitation issues related to above ground pools. Fencing, water quality, protection of the City water supply, electrical safety, ingress and egress, permitting and inspections, location on property and drainage are some issues to be considered in the installation and use of a swimming pool. Research into the history of this ordinance hasn't been helpful. .I've enclosed copies of the meeting minutes relating to above ground pools (enclosure #4). There seems to have been discussion, but only the results are recorded. The enclosed memorandum from David Velde, City Sanitarian, discusses aesthetic and life safety issues related to above ground pools (enclosure #5). The Health Department, headed by Mr. Velde, administers swimming pool regulations. Pictures of the pool are included (enclosure #6) Staff Report, CBA03 -01 • August 25, 2003 Page 2 of 2 Con clusion/Recommendation Based on potential issues associated with above ground swimming pools, staff does not support the request for variance. Enclosures: #1, 6/10/03 Dave Velde violation letter #2, 7/9/03 Chirpich appeals request #3, ECC, Sec 450 #4, Excerpts from Edina City Council minutes, 4/2/79, 4/16/79, 6/4/79, 6/18/79 #5, 8/19/2003 David Velde memorandum #6, pool pictures H :\ConstBd Wppeals\BD03- 06,CBA03 -01,5601 McGuire ., , - - INTEROFFICE..MEMORANDUM TO: STEVE KIRCHMAN, EDINA BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM: DAVID VELDE, EDINA HEALTH DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: ABOVE GROUND SWIMMINGTOOLS DATE: 8/19/2003 CC: The City of Edina regulates residential swimming.pools. for health and- safety reasons. In . 1979, the Edina City Council adopted, an ordinance prohibiting above ground swimming pools. This prohibition was adopted for aesthetic reasons. Beyond the aesthetics of the above ground swimming. pool, I believe that access to the swimming pool for life saving becomes more difficult due to the lack of decking around the above ground swimming pool. Furthermore, if one were to construct an elevated deck around the swimming pool, the deck would also obstruct access to the swimming pool. ^ , , � � �� ': 'y��"�,,'.�"s,� o♦ � ,•'h a -- L % ,r�i� YC '. ..,�.:.� �. ♦R'� � .,. 4. �'•s � if ,•!� � :!•. i2 �. M �r >�� - _ � � 1 .JR' .. .:'� �'3^:V '- . �i. c s i ;.� ♦ „� +��i 1� ( ' .r: {'''� bdtlM" . a, . 1''= <�� �'•j"t ',. t " r' ` L , ,a , ^ , •`tom � Y 1 • ` - I� r� LN ... v y �.yLgl e a• ' i' .41.!" ��fr.•..� e � I ll�.j ►� i�.� •b ..n _ ,. .. _,max., ro � ,.'ti ��cY` ->� t'`� i,,4y �'y"�.1"i<�... • d.� it ;: '� °w� L { r a.i, .. a. . . �:� .•�. .,F �'tr;. '��i k � sr•.j�•v"+r4,�"a: "�ltl✓� �'�'�4r ."�3"`y�`"".., r r} %, � M' ., `9x - . t: , µ , �• "qit ,� -.:'. � "�e+amlu ..,`�dr:.++M� ....a�, + 'flfi�., r�� '"io� '�' ..... .''y,� r t , , { t VA Pvti or 77 *Sze - tv -Vol 7 417 CA 6v lot lei..... ..... ?1 4-0 tz Z�� ���*5>� t-+ r�:' i Yi" 3 L i �t }S yS a '4 f'�� +•a`E'�,��y�: I Construction Board of Appeals Meeting Minutes September 3, 2003 7:00 AM, Edina City Hall Lower Level Conference Room Board members present: John Glover, Ed Noonan, Dave Fisher, Ron Clark, Quentin Collins Public attendees: Grant Malcom - 5609 McGuire Rd., 952 -941 -2651; Judy Chirpich - 5601 McGuire Rd., 952- 9441013; Gerald Robinson - 5600 7& St. W, 952 -941 -4655 Staff present: Dave Velde, Steve Kirchman, Bev Haw I. OPENING OF MEETING Mr. Kirchman opened meeting with a roll call and introduced the newest member, John Glover. Boardmember Glover gave a history of his experience and qualifications to serve on this Board. Mr. Kirchman explained that this Board meets only on an "as needed" basis, the last meeting was in 2000. H. ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN AND CO -CHAIR Discussion by members as to whom would be interested in Chairman position and what is required of the Chairman. Boardmember Noonan made a motion to elect John Glover as Chairman. Motion seconded by Boardmember Clark, vote was unanimous to elect John Glover as Chairman. Chairman Glover suggests Boardmember Noonan as Vice Chair, Boardmember Noonan accepts, vote is unanimous to elect Boardmember Noonan as Vice Chairman. II. CBA03 -01: 5601 McGuire Rd — Appeal of Ordinance prohibiting above ground swimming pools. Chairman Glover states the purpose of the meeting is the case of Peter and Judy Chirpich and' their appeal of the ordinance prohibiting above ground pools. Members have reviewed the staff report and two members of the board have visited the site. Mr. Kirchman stated that an above ground pool was discovered in response to a complaint, the Health Department, which regulates pools, notified the Chirpichs of the prohibitions in Edina against above ground pools and their appeal rights. The Chirpichs appeal was received on July 9, 2003. Notice was published and everyone within 200 ft was notified. Mr. Kirchman explained that the ordinance simply prohibits above ground pools, there is no discussion in the code about why. There are no rules in place to regulate them. Mr. Kirchman did do some research into when the ordinance was passed in 1979, and there are no verbatim minutes. The minutes simply noted that there was some discussion and that it was passed. There is an enclosed memo from Mr. Velde, the City Sanitarian that discusses what he believes to be the CBA minutes 9/03/2003 Page 2 of 6 reasoning for the prohibition of above ground pools. Based on the ordinance the staff does not support the request for a variance. Chairman Glover requested opinions from neighbors present at meeting. Mr. Grant Malcom, a neighbor- of the Chirpichs, did not understand why they should not be allowed to have the pool. Mr. Malcom stated that there was no reasoning for not allowing the pools when it was put in place back in 1979. Mr. Malcom stated that he has no objections to the pool, and, in fact, loves the pool. Boardmember Noonan raised the concern of no fencing around the pool and asked Mr. Malcom if that was a concern for him. Mr. Malcom replied that fencing was not a concern. Another neighbor, Mr. Robinson, stated that he had no objection to the pool at all and stated that since they have moved into their home they have allowed their 3 yr old daughter to frequently play in the pool. Mr. Robinson has no safety concerns regarding this pool and believes the design of this pool seems almost brilliant because it is a soft -sided pool which means it is easy for an adult to get in and push the sides down. They collapse right down and you can step right into it. The way it slopes up kids can't climb into the pool because they can't get a handhold. The depth is great for his 3 yr old, about 2 ft deep, so it is only chest deep allowing her to play and gain confidence in the water. Mr. Robinson stated that he is not bothered by the fact that there is no fence surrounding the pool, however, if there were a requirement for a fence he would certainly understand that. Mr. Robinson suggested that perhaps the original ordinance was based upon esthetics back in 1979 but that things have changed as far as types of entertainment equipment. Back in 1979 people went to Sears and paid $50 for a swing set, now people are paying $4,000 on big play structures, there are trampolines that are 20 ft wide with netting that goes up 12 —15', people are doing sport courts. Values have shifted; people are putting a lot more emphasis on recreation and sports opportunities. This pool seems within a reasonable bounds, its under 20' diameter, and its only 2' deep. Mr. Robinson maybe would be opposed if it were 40' long and 4' deep at which point he would recommend it be installed in- ground. This pool is only up temporarily due to the short swimming season, its great for the younger kids. Mr. Robinson stated that his 3 yr old was intimidated going to the public pool, its much more difficult to supervise the young children at the public pool, there is a lot of rough housing and older children around, whereas this pool is of tremendous benefit. Chairman Glover agreed that the ordinance does not clarify why above ground pools are not allowed. Chairman Glover said that he has looked at the pool and really could not see the objections to it. Chairman Glover stated that he has a trampoline in his backyard that is higher than this pool. When this ordinance was written 25 years ago there was no thought of trampolines. Boardmember Clark asked for an explanation of what defines a "special purpose" pool. CBA minutes 9/03/2003 Page 3 of 6 Mr. Velde explained that it would be like a hot tub or a whirlpool. A "wading pool" is a pool that is less than 24" in depth and is constructed in the ground. Small plastic pools are not regulated, and can be any size if under 24" in depth. Boardmember Noonan questions what liability the City would have if something were to happen to a child in an allowed above ground pool without fencing or any other restrictions that we currently have on other in ground or indoor pools. Boardmember Noonan recounted a situation 3 or 4 years ago when he sat on a hearing regarding egress around a pool deck that was to narrow to get a health rescue stretcher by, and the positioning of the stairway railing, and the City was concerned over possibility of some liability. Boardmember Noonan raised the issue of any possible exposure that the City might incur as a result of the approval of this pool. Boardmember Noonan indicated that he did not feel as though he has enough information to make an adequate decision. Boardmember Noonan was a paramedic for Hennepin County and assisted on 6 drownings - 3 in outdoor pools and 3 in indoor bathtubs, and understands the potential dangers. Because of the lateness of the season could we consider tabling this issue until we could study it further and basically give them the right to keep the pool up for the rest of the season and by next spring have the information available and go through Council or staff to study this and make a decision that would be in effect for the next swimming season. . Mr. Kirchman stated that one of the choices at this time would be to not take any action and refer it to the City Council for review and possibly changing the ordinance. If this appeal is denied they have the right to appeal. The pool would not be ordered to be removed until the appeal process has been completed. The Chirpichs can appear before the Council and try to get the ordinance changed. Mr. Robinson disagreed with the statement that if this pool were to be allowed then all above ground pools would need to be allowed and suggested that the staff would be required to set forth safety regulations and parameters. Mr. Robinson suggested that staff could do additional research and set forth regulations regarding depth, length, type of sides, rescue accessibility. Mr. Robinson also recommended looking at ordinances from other cities. Chairman Glover stated that this Board does not have the authority to overthrow this ordinance, or even change this ordinance and approve this variance. Times have changed and what is backyard recreation is a lot different than it was 25 years ago. Chairman Glover suggested that although he personally had no problem with the pool, the Board can't change the ordinance. What we can do is take this issue to Council. Mr. Velde then addressed the 1979 decision to restrict above ground pools. At that time the City Council was not sure whether we should restrict above ground pools or not. The reason they held it over for one meeting was they wanted to get some press out to the public. There was an article written in the local paper and the public did not respond. Some council members did speak to people that they knew and some thought that the public did not want to see above ground swimming pools so the Council decided to keep the ordinance as it was and not to allow above ground swimming pools. CBA minutes 9/03/2003 Page 4 of 6 Chairman Glover stated that, in his opinion, the above ground pool prohibition was not related to health issues, but health issues need to be considered and should be put into any regulations which would be adopted. Issues of concern would be chlorine levels, PH balance, bacteriological counts and other issues that would be the same as owners of in ground pools. The pool owners would have some duties that they would have to live up to. Mrs. Chirpich agreed that these levels must be maintained or you will end up with a green pool that would not be safe. This ordinance does not regulate pools with a depth of less than 24". Mrs. Chirpich indicated that her pool is 25 Y2" deep. Chairman Glover questioned if this pool could have an overflow valve which. would keep the depth under, 24"' and the Board could make a recommendation to the City at which time they could review the ordinance and determine restrictions and regulations. Boardmember Fisher said that he did not have a problem with this .particular pool, however, this would raise the question of what would be allowed and what would not be allowed and that approving this pool would open a can of worms. Chairman Glover suggested that this ordinance would not be studied and changed before the next pool season. Boardmember Noonan is not comfortable with recommending a o ao around time. interpretation of on at the ordinance as it stands now. The Board has specific choices t Boardmember Noonan asked staff that if the Board recommends the issue be referred to Council, would the staff agree to investigate on behalf of the Council and make a staff recommendation. Chairman Glover asked Mr. Velde if the Health Department does inspection of in ground swimming pools. Mr. Velde replied that we do a final inspection when they are installed but we do not do maintenance inspections. The only maintenance inspections that are done by the City are on public and semi -public pools such as apartment buildings, the aquatic center, the YMCA, that type of place. Mr. Velde indicated that there are over 500 private swimming pools in the City and we do not do maintenance inspections on them. The only issue on the books regarding in ground swimming pools is the one that was in question in 1979. That pool was partially above ground and they did finish off the grade around the entire pool so that it was below grade. That was the situation that caused the wording, "above ground" to be included in the ordinance. Mr. Robinson's suggested another option available to the Board. Instead of referring this issue to Council the Board could direct staff to further research above ground pools and report back with recommendations to be discussed and forwarded to Council. Chairman Glover discussed with W. Robinson the extent that this board could do further study and make recommendations to the Council. Chairman Glover suggests that a recommendation be made to request staff to revisit the issue, look at the issue again, and make another staff report. CBA minutes 9/03/2003 Page 5 of 6 The current report was made by Mr. Velde but the recommendation to deny the ordinance came from Mr. Kirchman based on the facts of how the ordinance stands today. Boardmember Collins pointed out the ordinance is very clear, and even though we are considerate of this particular case, the ordinance is very straightforward and does not give us any "wiggle" room. Chairman Glover states that we can recommend that the staff look at the issue again, put it out for public comment, and consider recommending ordinance revisions to the Council. Boardmember Collins agreed that we are headed in the right direction. Mrs. Chirpich stated that she is hearing a degree of support to at least look at updating or changing the current ordinance. Mrs. Chirpich requested further consideration and study on the safety and esthetic issues and to consider a variance for this pool. Mrs. Chirpich also suggested that other backyard play sets, trampolines, hot tubs and additional play items are relatively new items and should also be looked at. Chairman Glover replied to Ms. Chirpich that the board would not be comfortable going to the Council to support this particular pool. Ms. Chirpich responded that she was not particularly requesting a specific variance for their pool . but support to revise the City Code with different parameters regarding size, etc. and bring the City Code up to date with regard to all recreational equipment. Boardmember Noonan states that he has great confidence in the Board, the Council and the City staff; however, he does not feel that at this time the Board could grant a variance for this particular pool. Boardmember Noonan would recommend reexamining the ordinance, do further study and make recommendations to the Council. Examination of health and safety issues, fire department rescue issues, possible liability issues and possible insurance issues need further study to make an informed decision. Mr. Kirchman suggested that a motion be made to direct staff to make recommendations on possible changes to the ordinance and report back to the Board at the next meeting. The Council could always direct the board to further investigate. The staff will study health and safety issues and report to the board. This staff report will be distributed prior to the next scheduled meeting to give everyone an opportunity to review the recommendations. A motion to direct staff to do further study and report back to the board was made by Boardmember Noonan. The motion was seconded by Boardmember Fisher. No discussion. Chairman Glover called for a vote; the result was unanimous approval of this motion. Boardmember Noonan thanked Mrs. Chirpich for the opportunity to look into this issue. i CBA minutes 9/03/2003 Page 6 of 6 Boardmember Fisher asked Mrs. Chirp old fell in, would the 2 yr oldebe ableto g t �? vable ladder was not m the pool and a year Mrs. Chirpich replied "no". Discussion closed and the residents left the meeting at this tune. IV. CBA03 -02: 6301 Knoll Dr. S. - Edina City Code, Section 450.06, Subd 8, regulating pool ladders Mr. Kirchman stated that the next meeting date would be set to discuss the requirement for a ladder in a pool. The approved plans for the pool required a ladder that was not installed. Boardmember Fisher suggested that homeowner just install the ladder. Mr. Kirchman stated that homeowner did not want to do that. A final inspection for this pool has not been approved. V. NEXT MEETING DATE AND AGENDA — Monday, September 22, 2003 7:00 A.M. The first possible date for the next meeting would be September 22, 2003 or anytime after that date. Staff report for the Chirpich appeal will be ready by that time. Boardmember Noonan requested an updated roster including cell phone numbers. Board members discussed issues that will be addressed in the staff report regarding above ground pools. Future issues that may need to be addressed would include trampolines, skateboards, rollerblades, hot tubs, swing sets, soccer goals and other recreational items. Boardmember Noonan made a motion to adjourn; Chairman John Glover seconded it. VI. ADJOURNMENT: 8:00 A.M, Respectfully submitted Steve A. Kirchman Board Secretary 41r Construction Board of Appeals Staff Report September 29, 2003 CBA03 -01 Peter and Judy Chirpich 5601 McGuire Road Lot 6, Block 69 La Buena Vista Request: A variance from Code Section 450.06, Subd • 11, prohibiting above ground swimming pools Background: A soft -sided swimming pool was installed at 5601 McGuire Road. The swimming pool is located in the rear yard and rests on the ground. The swimming p ool is designed to hold water to a depth _ of 30 inches. A notice was sent to the residents at 5601 McGuire Road instructing them to remove the above ground swimming poo1pursuant -to City Code Section 450.06, Subd. 11, which prohibits the installation of above ground swimming pools. d the notice to remove the above ground swimming pool to the Board of The residents appeale Construction Appeals and the appeal was heard on September 9, 2003. The Construction Board of Appeals deferred action on the appeal and requested more information from staff regarding insurance, health and safety, and input from other swimming pool contractors. Issues /Analysis City Code Section 450 defines a swimming pool �nches�The subject swidrnmi g pool exgn�faor human use, with a water depth greater than water depth of 24 inches, therefore meets the definition of a swimming pool and must meet the requirements of Code Section 450. The Code requires the submission of construction plans and the issuance of a building permit prior to installing a swimming pool. The swimming pool was installed without plans or building permit. The Code expressly prohibits above ground swimming pools. The swimming pool is installed on the ground, above grade. The Code requires the installation of a fence around the swimming pool equipped with self - closing and self - latching gates. There is no fence around the swimming pool. The Code requires a four -foot wide, unobstructed deck around the swimming pool. There is no deck around the swimming pool for rescue purposes. A memorandum from Edina Fire Chief Marty Scheerer is attached expressing his concern about rescue operations involving above ground swimming pools. The Code requires a recirculation system consisting of pumps, piping, filters, skimmers, valves and disinfection equipment, which comply with the National Sanitation Foundation (NSF) . Staridard No. 50. The swimming pool has a pump and filter. The swimming pool does not have skimmers or disinfection equipment installed in the piping. It is not known if the pump and filter meet NSF Standard No. 50. A local swimming pool contractor indicated that owners of these soft -sided pools were seeking help from them in filter replacement and controlling water clarity. Model standards have been developed by the National Swimming Pool Institute (NSPI) for residential swimming pools, both in ground and above ground. There are no standards for soft sided above ground swimming pools. The City of Edina utilizes model standards, whenever possible, when adopting local Codes. The insurance industry was contacted for information about soft -sided above ground swimming pools. The company contacted did have fence requirements for swimming pools, including above ground swimming pools, but none for soft -sided portable swimming pools. Con dusion/Recommendation Soft -sided above ground swimming pools are a recent entry into the residential swimming pool market. Homeowners can purchase them. off the shelf and install them in their back yard at a low cost. There are no national standards for design, operation and construction of these'swimming pools and they may not have adequate filtration and circulation to maintain water quality. Gaining access to the swimming pool in a rescue operation appears to be problematic due to the lack of a deck around the perimeter of the swimming pool. Staff recommends denial of the appeal based upon the fact that the swimming. pool lacks a deck around the pool, there is no fence controlling access to the pool and there are no national standards available to evaluate the design, operation and construction of the swimming pool. Edina Fire Department 6250 Tracy Avenue Edina, Minnesota 55436 -2580 (952) 8260330 Fax (952) 8260393 Date: To: From: Subject: Mr. Velde, City of Edina 4801 west 50th &r cet Edina, Minnesota 95424-1594 (952) 927.8861 Fax (992) 8260390 MEMORANDUM September 5, 2003 David Velde, City Sanitarian Marty Scheerer, Fire Chief Above ground swimming pools This letter is to follow up on our conversation regarding above ground swimming pools in the City of Edina. The Edina Fire department would not recommend the approval of above ground swimming pools in the city. Above ground pools pose. a significant challenge to Fire Department personnel when try to attempt a rescue from a pool. Rescuers need a large stable area to work from and to stage equipment. Any steps or ladders are also an impediment to any rescue efforts. The large soft -sided pools would also be difficult to perform a rescue from due to the large volume of water that would rush at the fire personnel in a rescue attempt. Should you have any further questions, please contact me. CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING MINUTES SEPTEMBER 29, 2003 Board Members Present: Ron Clark, John Glover, Dave Fisher, Ed Noonan, Members Absent: Bruce Bermel, Quentin Collins Staff Present: Dave Velde, Steve Kirchman, Bev Haw Others Present: Mrs. Judy Chirpich - 5601 McGuire Rd, W.Gerald Robinson - 5600 70t' St W I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: Chairman Glover stated he did not receive 9/3/03 minutes. Mr. Kirchman said that the minutes were mailed, but will be remailed and the Board can make any necessary changes. II. OLD BUSINESS: CBA03 -02: - 5602 McGuire Rd. - Edina City Code, Section 450.06 Subd 11, prohibiting above ground swimming pools Chairman Glover confirmed receipt of the staff report by Board members and Chirpichs and opened the issue the for discussion. Judy Chirpich brought up the concern about the difficulty of rescue from this pool. She had taken pictures of herself entering and exiting the pool but her printer did not work so she was unable to bring them. She stated that this is a 5000 - gallon toddler pool and in her opinion it is a very easy pool to get in and out of Mrs. Chirpich also brought up the memo she received from the Fire Chief stating they needed a large stable area to work from, but it doesn't state the size of the pool. She again stressed how easy the pool is to get in and out of, with only a depth of 25 ". Mrs. Chirpich then commented on the question of the rushing water when emptied. She mentioned she and her neighbor experienced it when they started emptying it, adding that the rush is definitely a push but not enough to push an adult over. The water "rush" did not push either one of them over. Boardmember Noonan questioned the depth of the pool, restrictions on the height, what determines it to be a pool, wading pool vs. swimming pool, etc. He added he has some concerns with no type of boundary or guidance from the City on this. Boardmember Noonan questioned if this pool requires a permit. He pointed out no permit was issued for CBA minutes 9/29/2003 Page 2 this pool, Chirpichs did not understand if they needed a permit, and the code requirements should be more clear. Boardmember Noonan suggested using the About Town or other means of technology to address some of these issues to head them off. Boardmember Noonan then brought up fencing safety on both above and in ground pools and the ability for anyone walk up to this pool. He also questioned the deck requirement around the pool. Is this a good thing or bad thing? We do not allow them to raise the grade to make up the deck surface. He brought up his experience as a paramedic and concerns on rescues, other than drowning, were head and neck injuries. Because of this, more equipment is brought into a pool and the staging area is a little more important with backboards etc, to adequately get people safely out of the pool. This is a different application, there is no diving into the pool, but such injuries could happen even in a shallow body of water. He talked to Marty (Fire Chief) about the effect of water rushing out of the pool on rescuers who will be burdened with gear and unknowledgeable of what they are getting into till they get to the scene. He questioned how health issues would be regulated on a 5,000 - gallon pool with no required chemical treatment. Judy Chirpich commented that she uses chemicals to keep the pool water clean. Boardmember Noonan questioned the size of the body of water and whether it would be harder to maintain then a wading pool, and asked if that should be looked at. Chairman Glover mentioned that before he received the staff report he was more accepting of the pool. The sanitation aspect is not one that is high on priorities because one can have the system in any pool and not put chemicals in or not operate it properly. Chairman Glover said his concern is the lack of an unobstructed deck around the pool and the lack of fencing. He pointed out if the variance for this pool - which is 30" deep and fairly accessible to an adult person for rescue - is approved, then other above ground pools that are higher will have to be addressed. Until we have some model codes in effect and some experience he will not support this appeal. Boardmember Clark mentioned that his biggest concern is safety, or the lack of it and the City does have an ordinance in place regulating pools. This type of above ground pool is a new twist for the City, and if the board approves this pool the board may not be in keeping with the ordinance. Boardmember Clark said he personally has concerns over this and has concerns especially for the City of Edina. The safety issue is a huge concern for him and he can't see how he can support the variance request. Boardmember Fisher stated he also agrees this type of pool presents a safety issue. If this pool is approved, where does the City draw the line? He added he agrees with other comments that this poses problems, and in his opinion the variance would be tough to support. Chairman Glover asked if there is any further discussion Boardmember Noonan asked if there is any conditional use that could be considered here. CBA minutes 9/29/2003 ' Page 3 Mr. Kirchman stated this an issue that the City Council may want to look into and see if they are willing to considef it. He added he doesn't believe a conditional use permit can be implemented here, but the Board can make recommendations to the Council. Boardmember Noonan mentioned since the pool is already down for the season, it appears the homeowner has time to appeal our decision to the Council. Chairman Glover asked for a motion on this variance request Boardmember usher motioned for denial. Boardmember Clark seconded the motion.. All voted aye; motion to deny variance passed. Asked if there was any recommendation that can be made at this time that this be forwarded on and who has to actually make the request to the city for an appeal to council Mr. Kirchman also stated that staff has already made their recommendations based on our research, but if the Construction Board of Appeals would like to pass on recommendations to Council that needs to be included in the motion. Chairman Glover asked if the insurance company had been spoken to. Mr. Velde said that he called an adjuster, and they said they didn't have any experience on the soft -sided pools. Boardmember Clark asked if there were a kind of set up standards either by the manufacturers or the distributors or the insurance industry that we might want to borrow to incorporate that language into this ordinance. That way we would have a clearer set of standards Mr. Velde said there are standards for above ground swimming pools that are established by the National Swimming Pool Institute. That is something that could be incorporated into an ordinance if we are suggesting allowing above ground swimming pools in the City. There are no standards for the smaller soft -sided portable swimming pool. Boardmember Clark mentioned at the last meeting they discussed considering that the Council look into the possibility of allowing above ground pools. It was acknowledged at that time that the Council would have to revisit this issue because this board does not have the authority to make that decision. Boardmember Clark noted the board is aware the City looked into permitting above ground pools in the past and the Council decided at that time to prohibit them. f CBA minutes 9/29/2003 Page 4 Mr. Kirchman asked that even in the absence of an appeal you could direct us to inquire to Council whether they would be willing to consider any changes in the ordinance Gerald Robinson asked for a clarification from Mr. Velde why there are no standards for soft -sided pools by the National Swimming Pool Institute. Are those standards for water quality, or does cover other safety issues, for example the decking, ladders etc Mr. Velde explained that it covers everything from filtration equipment, design, whether it has a diving pool or not, recirculation system, filters, chlorinators, pumps and includes standards for water quality. Mr. Robinson pointed out that it seems to just cover the mechanicals and water quality but not the safety, or rescue type of issues, like the decking, fencing, etc. Mr.Velde said that there is a section on decking and fencing, they recommend those, they are not part of the standards but recommendations for communities to follow. Chairman Glover asked how to direct staff to go to council with this recommendation so we are not left in the same situation as when we first started this. There was discussion with the council about 15 -20 years ago and there is no record as to why is was turned down. Need to get out concerns of the issue of safety around the pool to Council. Mr. Velde suggested a memo from the chair to the City Council to raise that issue. Staff could draft a memo for Chairman Glover to sign and pass it on to City Council and they could ask for more information or take it from there. Boardmember Noonan would like to expand this discussion from pools to include play structures, trampolines, etc. Mr. Robinson stated that, in his opinion, the Construction Board of Appeals has the ability to go into depth if they chose to do an initial draft of a code. To go to the City Council and say, here are our thoughts on the issue and some initial background research, at least give them a little firmer starting position. Mr. Kirchman explained that the Construction Board of Appeals actually is required by the State to be in place by the State Building Codes and Standard Division and its primary purpose is to make decisions on the building code, not on city ordinances. Typically, a Construction Board of Appeals would not be dealing with city ordinances at all; they would be dealing with state codes. But this is the way we are set up here. I would prefer that since we are working with a city ordinance that we can't change anyway that we let Council look at it and direct staff or the Board. They may send it back to us to make some recommendations for an ordinance. If so, the Board will have a clear direction and directive. 4. r CBA minutes 9/29/2003 Page 5 Chairman Glover asked if any other comments Steve Kirchman confirmed that the staff will draw up a memo for the Chair to go to Council H. CBA03 -02: 6301 Knoll Dr. S. — Edina City Code, Section 450.06, Subd 8, regulating pool ladders Chairman Glover next item on the agenda is in regards to the swimming pool ladder at the Brockway residence and it clearly falls under jurisdiction. Asked if everyone read information put together by staff. Asked for discussion Boardmember Noonan asked who signed the permit when it was picked up, was it the homeowner or through a pool company? Mr. Velde answered that it was a pool company and they were aware that a ladder was required. Boardmember Noonan asked if the signature line of the permit application "I will comply with all," part of the language? Mr. Kirchman answered yes and it was marked on the plans. Boardmember Fisher asked why is he appealing this? Mr. Velde answered that Mr. Brockway doesn't want the ladder. He's got a swim -out in the deep end that he uses to get in and out of the pool and doesn't want the ladder obstructing the view of the pool, because the ladder has a handrail. Boardmember Fisher mentioned that they knew this before he built the pool that a ladder was required. Mr. Velde said that he doesn't know if the homeowner knew but the contractor did, and we believe that the reason the ladder with the hand rail is necessary is if somebody is in trouble in the water they at least have something to grab onto to pull themselves out. Boardmember Fisher is surprised why this is even here, suggested to put the ladder in. Boardmember Noonan asked Mr. Velde if he has seen the pool Mr. Velde said no that Solvei Wilmot has, she was out on the final inspection and discovered the ladder missing. Boardmember Noonan asked if there was any hardware embedded into the construction at all that would accept a ladder CBA minutes 9/29/2003 ' Page 6 Mr. Velde said that that was not even there Boardmembers asked for swim -out details. Mr. Velde explained that on the deep end where the water is 6' or deeper a ledge is built in the corner of the pool just below water level to enable a swimmer to swim over there and sit on the and/or get out of the pool. These swim -outs are not permitted. City Code requires a ladder with handrails. A ladder can be installed without obstructing an existing swim -out. Boardmember Noonan asked if everything else meet code. Mr. Velde answered .yes — also mentioned that there are about 20 inground swimming pools installed each year. We have well over 1000 pools in the City and it is not unusual to see a swim out but it is unusual to see a swim -out without a ladder. Boardmember Noonan commented on since the City doesn't do yearly inspections of these pools that these requirements are observed only at the final. Boardmember Fisher made a motion to deny the variance request. Chairman Glover seconded. All voted aye. The motion to deny the variance passed. Chairman Glover asked for any other discussion for any upcoming items. Chairman Glover asked for a motion to adjourn Boardmember Fisher made a motion, Boardmember Noonan seconded, all voted aye. The meeting was adjourned at 8:OOAM. City of Edina MEMORANDUM TO: Edina City Council FROM: Edina Construction Board of Appeals John Glover, Chairman DATE: October 23, 2003 SUBJECT: Above ground swimming pools, ECC 450.06, Subd. 11 On September 29, 2003 the Construction Board of Appeals denied a request for a variance for an above ground swimming pool at 5601 McGuire Road. Edina City Code Section 450.06, Subd. 11 prohibits above ground swimming pools. During deliberation on this matter, the Board questioned the reasoning behind the prohibition on above ground swimming pools in Edina. Research by staff found that the prohibition on above ground swimming pools was adopted by ordinance in 1979. The minutes from the City Council meeting did not shed much light on the reasoning behind the prohibition. The Board believes the prohibition was based upon aesthetics. The Board is requesting a reaffirmation of this prohibition from the City Council. The Board questions why an above ground swimming pool is treated differently than a large play structure or a trampoline in someone's yard. Beyond the issue of aesthetics, should above ground swimming pools be permitted, when other issues such as safety and sanitation are considered? G.•\CouaS"ppeah\ BD034 06, CBA03 -01,5601McGumeRdlCBAaWwgrthmbI City Hall (952) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (952) 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (952) 826 -0379 C. A MEMORANDUM r wev OCT z �Uud TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Gordon L. Hughes, City Manager C17-- r < )F ; '� - -GiN4 FROM: Jerome P. Gilligan DATE: October 24, 2003 RE: Appeal from Construction Board of Appeals Regarding Above Ground Swimming Pool The Construction Board of Appeals heard an appeal from the homeowners at 5201 McGuire Road concernizig a notice received from the City to remove an above ground swimming pool from their property. Section 450.06, subd. 11 of the City Code, prohibits above ground swimming pools. The appeal was denied by the Construction Board of Appeals and the homeowners are appealing this decision to the City Council. The removal of an above ground swimming pool is not a matter which is subject to an appeal to the Construction Board of Appeals and for this reason the appeal should be denied by the Council. Under Section 450.01 of the City Code, a swimming pool is defined as "any basin for holding water, designed for human use, with a water depth greater than 24 inches." The pool at 5601 McGuire is designed to hold water to a depth of 30 inches and therefore constitutes a swimming pool under the City Code. Since it is located above ground it is prohibited by Section 450, subd. l l of the City Code. The homeowners appealed the notice to remove the pool to the Construction Board of Appeals. Section 400.02 of the City Code sets forth the powers and duties of the Construction Board of Appeals. Appeals may be considered by the Board from any order, requirement, permit, decision, refusal or determination made to the Building Official or the Sanitarian in the application or interpretation of the Code regulating certain building activities and excavations. In considering appeals the Construction Board of Appeals is determining whether the Building Official or Sanitarian is properly applying or interpreting the City Code and it does not have the power to grant variances or exceptions to the requirements of the City Code. The homeowners appealing the notice to remove the swimming pool are not contesting . the interpretation of the City Code relative to their above ground swimming pool but are requesting a variance or exception to the prohibition of above ground swimming pools. There is no authority for the City Council to grant variances from the requirements of Section 450 of the City Code. If the Council wants to permit this type of pool it will need to amend the requirements of Section 450 of the City Code relating to above ground pools. I recommend that the City Council deny the appeal on the basis that it is not the proper subject of an appeal to the Construction Board of Appeals since the Board did not have the jurisdiction to hear this appeal. DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP .. W k Steve Kirchman From: Bev Haw Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 10:45 AM To: Steve Kirchman Subject: FW: Case File: CBA03 -01 -- Original Message---- - From: Elizabeth E Stukel [ mailto :elizabeth.e.stukel @aexp.com] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 5:10 PM To: bhaw®ci.edina.mn -us Subject: Case File: CBA03 -01 We live at 5517 McGuire Road, and our backyard adjoins that of Peter and Judy Chirpich. Not only do we not object to the child size swimming pool in their yard, we enjoy seeing the children play in it. It would be very disappointing for the Chirpich family, and their neighbors if the pool were disallowed. Betsy E. and Randall J. Stukel. American Express made the following annotations on 10/27/2003 06:16:34 PM -------------------------------- **, rw�t, r**** w* t, r*** wt* t**, r** w, r*, r, r, r, rrr*******, r***, r, r**, r* * * *,r,► * * * * * * *tt *,rt * * * *,e * *t,r "This message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, a- disclosure, copying, use, or distribution of the information included in this message ai any attachments is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and immediately and permanently delete this message and any attachments. Thank you." zvM wn 40`104jrd- Th eat -Mey DUILDING QEPAATMENT I - - kF ,a- OUT 2 1 2003 L4vsPS y e y a�� �� S City of Edina, Minnesota CITY OF EDi EDINA CITY COUNCIL 801 West 501 Street * Edina, Minnesota * (952) 826-0372 * Fax (952) 826 -0390 64A 6. 1 j�o �iis F��I(s�Ce ,,ASE FILE: TO: APPLICANT: PROPERTY ADDRESS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: CBA03 -01 Property Owners Within 200 Feet Peter and Judy Chirpich 5601 McGuire Rd Lot 6, Block 6, La Buena Vista PURPOSE: Edina City Code, Section 450.069 Subd 11, prohibiting above ground Swimming pools. DATE OF HEARING: Monday, November 3, 2003 OF HEARING' 7.00 pm n NA %A 4 �i 1 � s d I ' v � a � I TIME PLACE OF HEARING: Council Chambers Edina City Hall Z*ubzmit 50th Street HOW TO PARTICIPATE: a letter expressing your vie *Attend the hearing and give testimony, *Fax your views 952 826 0390 or, *E -Mail to bhaw @ci.edina.mn.us FURTHER INFORMATION: Write: City Hall, Inspections Department at 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424 or call 952 927 8861 DATE OF NOTICE: Wednesday October 15, 2003 City of Edina Buildings, Construction and Signs 450.10 water line indicating the greatest depth in feet. Diving structures shall be securely anchored. Subd. 10 Minimum Depth. The minimum depth for all pools shall be three feet except for special purpose pools. Subd. I Above Ground Swimming Pool; FilL Swimming Pools that are constructed or erected wholly above ground are and shall be prohibited. No fill shall be placed or grading done on the property to raise the ground elevation for the purpose of raising the top elevation of the pool walls. 450.07 Recirculation System. A recirculation system consisting of pumps, piping, filters, skimmers, valves, and disinfection equipment shall be provided which will clarify and disinfect the. swimming pool water volume in 12 hours or less. The recirculation system components shall comply with NSF International 50, .1985. 450.08 Recirculation Pump. The recirculating pump shall have sufficient capacity to provide the rated flows of the filter system, without exceeding the head loss at which the pump will deliver such flows. The pump motor shall not be operated at an overload which exceeds the service factor. The pool pump shall be equipped on the inlet side with an approved hair and lint interceptor. The basket of the interceptor shall be non - corrosive and have openings not larger thaw one - fourth inch in diameter. 450.09 Pool Piping. The pool piping shall be sized to permit the rated flows for filtering and cleaning without exceeding the maximum head at which the pump will provide such flows. In general, the water velocity in the pool piping should not exceed more than six feet per second. Where velocity is to exceed six feet per second, summary calculations shall be provided to show that rated flows are possible with the pump and piping provided. The recirculating piping. and fittings shall meet the following requirements: Subd. 1 Vacuum Fitting Location. Where vacuum fittings are provided, they shall be located in accessible positions below the water line. Subd. 2 Pool Recirculation Piping. Pool recirculation piping, passing through the pool structure, shall be copper, brass, or approved equal tubing with a minimum wall thickness of type "U'. Subd.3 Pool Piping System. The pool piping system shall be constructed of materials prescribed in the Minnesota State Plumbing Code. Subd. 4 Inspection of Pool Piping. Except for the pool water supply line, all pool piping must be installed by the pool contractor and must be inspected by the Building Official prior to covering the system. 450.10 Recirculating Skimming Device. Recirculating skimming devices shall be provided to skim the surface of the pool, with one unit installed to serve each pool, and such additional 450-6 Supplement 2001 -01 My 12, 2006 Hello Again, My name is Flora Delaney and I spoke to you at the Edina City Council on July 5a' regarding above ground swimming pools. I thought I would give you a troubling update. I will not be speaking before your group again. Ever. I have taken down, the pool in question. Not because I agree with the current state. Not because I do not want to have a way for my children to enjoy their summer during these hot days by swimming and laughing in the back yard. But days after speaking at the City Council I received and ugly, threatening anonymous phone call from a man who had learned my name and address from the meeting. He also took the time to find out my phone number, when I had moved to Edina and how much I had paid for my house. Like all bullies, he was too much of a coward to tell me anything about himself. But his threats were that I and my children ought not to live in Edina because of the issue of this stupid pool. That we should get the hell out of his city with our "tacky plastic pool" and let the people who really care about their homes live in this fine city. And he wanted us out of his city. He was angry, he was swearing and he knew where I and my children lived. I am not about to put my children and our property at risk over something as stupid as this pool. But, this got me to realize that maybe the city has this regulation not out of concern for public safety (we can see that all surrounding cities have created safe regulations to allow their citizens to have these pools — so I am sure Edina can figure out how to do it, too.) but because of a desire to protect landowners' perceived home values rather than the recreation needs of our children. Before going to the meeting on 7/5, I thought you could be convinced that a logical and common sense approach to this issue would allow you to resolve this issue for the benefits of families. I am not going to fight this because of fear for my family. You, however, have the ability to apply reason and weigh the benefits for our children versus people who feel as this caller did. I am appealing to you - in this private way - to look at the needs of families with tweens (too big for kiddy pools, too young to go to the aquatic center alone) and ask that you stand up to the elitists who believe an Edina address should protect their lifestyle that is fragile enough to be threatened by a pool and children playing. Working parents, families and a desire to be a "Fit City" with safe recreation options for people of all income levels should be in your thoughts when you make this decision. As for me, I will not appear before you again, because as the police told me after I got this call, "There is nothing I can do except conduct myself as safely as possible and look out for my family." I thought by participating in this democratic process, I was being a good citizen and being a good role model for my children about how one goes about working cooperatively, even when there is a disagreement. As our city leaders, you will have to ponder the chilling effect on public debate when people like this man can threaten open discussion about issues as trivial as swimming pools. Thank you for your consideration, Delaney i • 4is letter was sent to: James Hovland Scot Housh Ann Swenson Linda Masica Alice Hulbert To: Mayor & City Council From: Boyd Tate Traffic Safety Coordinator REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Date: July 18, 2006 Subject: Traffic Safety Staff Review for July 6, 2006 Recommendation: Agenda Item V. E Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Review and approve Traffic Safety Staff Review of Thursday, July 6, 2006. Info /Background: It is not anticipated that residents will be in attendance at the Council meeting regarding any of the attached issues. G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Advisory Committee \Staff Review Summaries \06 TS AG & Min \07 -05-06 TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW Thursday July 6, 2006 The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on July 6, 2006. Staff present included the City Engineer, Traffic Engineer, Traffic Safety Coordinator, Sign Coordinator, and Chief of Police. From that review, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They have also been informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the July 18, 2006 Council Agenda. SECTION A: Requests on which staff recommends approval: Request from Edina Fire Marshal to restrict parking on the north side of School Road to the west of Concord School and south around the curve to West 60I' Street. The Fire Marshal states that it is extremely difficult for emergency vehicles to navigate and operate along this street during school events due to the narrow width with vehicles parked on both sides of the roadway. The request will improve accessibility for emergency vehicles. School Road is a 24 -foot wide City Street from Concord Ave to Ruth Drive. West of Ruth Drive the street widens to 30 -feet. There is curb and gutter with no sidewalks. No vehicle or pedestrian accidents have been reported in the past five years. School Road has the following parking restrictions currently in place: "No Parking Anytime" on the north side of School Road from Concord running west to the parking lot of Concord School. "No Parking School Days" on the south side of School Road from Concord Ave running west to 4729 School Road. Parking is allowed on both sides of the street west of the parking lot and south to West 60th Street. At the July 5, 2006 council meeting, staff recommended that School Road be posted 'No Parking Anytime" from the west end of the parking lot of Concord School, to the west and south around the curve of School Road to West 60th Street. Two residents spoke against this recommendation at that meeting indicating their desire to maintain current parking due to the inconvenience of the pending restrictions. Council referred this issue back to the Traffic Safety Committee for further study and review. Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 1 of 2 July 6, 2006 After further evaluation, in an effort to balance the parking restrictions with safety, prohibiting parking only at the restrictive locations in lieu of the entire corridor appropriately accommodates emergency access needs. The less restrictive parking prohibitions include extending the existing no parking zone along the north side of W. 60th St. adjacent to the school westerly to Ruth Drive and also posting a no parking zone thru the 90- degree curve on the north and west sides. This compromise would impose fewer restrictions to the residents of School Road and would also meet the requirements of emergency service vehicles. Staff recommends that "No Parking Anytime" signs be placed on the north side of School Road, from the west side of the Concord School parking lot to Ruth Drive, and on the northwest sides of School Road from the west lot line of 4808 to the middle lot of 4816 School Road. SECTION B: Requests on which staff recommends denial of request: 1. Request to remove the No Parking Anytime signs from the north side of West 49th Street between Westbrook Lane and Brookside Avenue. Requestor is a resident on West 49th Street who feels that the No Parking Anytime signs on the north side of the street should be taken down. He states that these signs are violated on a regular basis by neighbors and their guests and that they are seldom enforced. West 49th Street is a 30 -foot wide City Street with curb and gutter and no sidewalks. Current parking restrictions are "No Parking Anytime" on the north side of the street. There are no parking restrictions on the south side. The Monday — Friday average daily traffic count is 339 vehicles with an 85 percentile speed of 31 m.p.h. There have been no pedestrian or vehicle accidents reported in the past 5- years. A similar request was made in October 1986. At that time Engineering recommended that the No Parking restrictions remain. This portion of West 49 Street is a main entrance to the neighborhood. Restricting parking to one side of the street ensures efficient traffic flow, especially during the winter months. One side parking also increases visibility at the Rail Road tracks just to the east of Brookside. Brookside Avenue. SECTION C: Requests that are deferred to a later date or referred to others. None for the July 6, 2006 meeting. Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 2 of 2 July 6, 2006 4,95 /A,l'U y 11, 2006 a School Road Area Residents City Of Edina Edina, MN. Re: Restricted Parking on School Road City of Edina Dear resident: On June 12, 2006, you received a letter from me regarding the Fire Marshal's request to restrict parking on School Road, to the west of Concord School (north side only) around the curve (west side only) to W. 60d' Street. The letter stated that you could come and speak to the City Council regarding this issue. Two residents appeared before the Council on 07/05/06 to voice disagreement about restricting the entire street. As a result, this matter was sent back to the Traffic Safety Committee for further study and review. After consulting with these two residents, the Fire Marshal and City staff, the following proposal was drafted and will be presented to Council at their regular City Council meeting on July 18, 2006, at 7:00 p.m. The Traffic Safety Committee's recommendation to Council will be to restrict parking on School Road on the north side, from the western entrance /exit of the Concord School parking lot west to Ruth Drive (due to the narrow street width), and along the north/west sides from the western lot line of 4808 to the middle of the lot of 4816 School Road (due to the 90- degree curve). The restriction will be "No Parking Anytime ". The Fire Marshal is concerned about the ability to get emergency vehicles down School Road during events at Concord School due to the narrowing of the street when vehicles are parked on both sides. Staff feels that this restriction is necessary to ensure the safety of the residents on School Road. This recommendation will be presented to the City Council at its regular meeting on Tuesday, July 18, 2006, at 7:00 p.m. Please contact me by Friday, July 14, 2006, at 952- 826 -0349 or e-mail at btate@ci.edina.mn.us if you wish to speak before the Council on this issue. Sincerely, o. Boyd ate Traffic Safety Coordinator City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 q( i�� MEMORANDUM •�JV:% CITY OF EDINA DATE: August 11, 2004 TO: Craig Larsen — City Planner FROM: Wayne Houle — City Engineer SUBJECT: "No Parking" Signs on West 49th Street between Westbrook Lane & Brookside Avenue Engineering has reviewed the above "No Parking" signs. West 49th Street is the only access into this neighborhood and is a 30 -foot wide roadway; this provides ample room for two -way traffic and parking on one side of the roadway. No parking restrictions currently exist on the northerly side of the roadway. These signs were installed prior to 1972 since our records reflect the following: ■ 12/13/72 — Request to remove the "No Parking" signs along West 49th Street. o Committee recommended denial until other traffic improvements in a- accomplished. ■ 12/13/77 — Request to remove "No Parking" signs at 5115 -5121 West 49th Street o Committee recommended approval of removal. ■ 10/14/86 —Request for "No Parking" signs at 5105 West 49th Street. o Committee recommended approval of installation. Engineering recommends that "No Parking" restrictions remain on this portion of West 49th Street. r�1 . F 1 Or _ oil 59TH ST W viWill f LO r 11 i►�trr I SRHOOL RD !1 ki 60TH ST . {° Ana, Legend N ccoc Proposed No Parking Anytime No Parking Anytime W E No Parking, M -F 7 -9 S No Parking School Days Nothing Posted Engineering Dept July, 2006 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: ( J- Steven L. Lillehaug Information Only Assistant City Engineer Date: July 18, 2006 Subject: NE Edina Transportation Action Study — Schedule Transportation Commission to Hold Public Hearing and 30- Day Comment Period. Recommendation: Agenda Item # V.F. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Authorize the Transportation Commission to conduct a public hearing on the NE Edina Transportation Study final draft report. Upon completion of the final hearing, the Commission will receive written comments for 30 days after which the Commission will formalize its final recommendation. The Transportation Commission public hearing is tentatively scheduled for July 31, 2006. Council consideration of the final report will occur in October. Info /Background: The NE Edina Transportation Study commenced in late 2005. After six study advisory committee meetings, numerous Transportation Commission meetings, two business representative meetings and three Open Houses, the study is nearing completion. The Final DRAFT NE Edina Transportation Study Report is complete and has been recommended for public input. Following the above referenced schedule and events, a DVD of the Public Hearing, written comments received during the 30 -day comment period and the Transportation Commission's recommendation and final report will be presented to the Council for consideration. G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Transportation Commission\Agendas\2006_R&R \rr to CC 7- 18- 06.doc CITY OF EDINA 716Pc.._., 8:07:42 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 1 7/6/2006 -7/6/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description - Business Unit 286069 7/6/2006 102403 AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT 105.85 BLACK DIRT 00001417 139184 25460 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 105.85 286070 716/2006 101304 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 2,481.45 INSTALL TOMMYGATE 00001065 139477 0107246 -IN 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 330.30 PAINT, REPAIRS 00001070 139478 0107247 -IN 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 2,811.75 286071 71612006 119577 ACCESS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 500.00 REGISTER FIBER LOCATES 139535 7191 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 500.00 286072 7/6/2006 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 40.84 139319 473900 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 22.12 139320 472341 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 63.96 139321 473869 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 35.56 139322 606519 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 85.24 139625 472342 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 72,68 139626 473899 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 30.28 139627 606517 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 52.68 139628 606557 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 25.56 139629 606559 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 428.92 286073 7/612006 102191 ADVANCED GRAPHIC SYSTEMS INC. 223.49 TONER 139479 INV00069620 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 223.49 286074 7/612006 102626 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES 379.41 READY MIX 00005917 139246 4154294 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 934.54 READY MIX 00005917 139480 4155314 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 648.99 CONCRETE FOR BENCHES 00005917 139481 4155581 1647.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK PATHS & HARD SURFACE 1,962.94 286075 716/2006 119786 AIRGAS NORTH CENTRAL 21.40 TORCH BODY REPAIR 00001909 139185 105622986 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN . 57.35 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 00001910 139186 105622987 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 78.75 286076 716/2006 111228 ALDEN POOL & MUNICIPAL SUPPLY 683.71 REPAIR OF FX 1 00001895 139247 600452 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation CITY OF EDINA' Council Check Register 716/2006 -7/6/2006 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description ., e SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES PRINTING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES 7/6/2006 8:07:42 Page - 2 - Business Unit ARENA ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GRILL GRILL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 683.71 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 286077 71612006 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 228.49 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 00008063 139248 72664 5510.6610 149.70 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 00002031 139536 72665 5630.6406 378.19 286078 716/2006 102715 ALLEGRA PRINT & IMAGING 665.77 2005 CAFR 139443 61250 1550.6575 665.77 286079 7/6/2006 103357 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO INC. 88.25 LISTEN DEVICE REPAIR 139187 SVCINVO6267 2210.6103 2,366.53 SCALA MAINT & SUPPORT 00004095 139537 INV66021 2210.6103 2,454.78 286080 716/2006 101874 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC. 964.75 ERT HEADSETS 00003022 139538 43529 1400.6710 964.75 286081 7/6/2006 102109 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER 1,720.94 RADIO INSTALL R -91 139482 69473 1470.6180 199.59 PAGER REPAIRS 139483 69477 1470.6180 113.17 RADIO REPAIRS 139616 69377 1470.6180 2,033.70 286082 71612006 102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE 1,068.15 FOOD 00006333 139249 591414 5421.5510 27.21 FOOD 139368 592549 5421.5510 1,095.36 286083 7/612006 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 136.50 COFFEE 139622 402270 1550.6406 136.50 286084 71612006 102134 ASHWORTH INC. 129.37 MERCHANDISE 00006475 139369 702171 5440.5511 797.42 MERCHANDISE 00006485 139370 736662 5440.5511 168.34 MERCHANDISE 00006485 139371 745433 5440.5511 36.77 MERCHANDISE 00006485 139372 744273 5440.5511 1,131.90 ., e SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES PRINTING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES 7/6/2006 8:07:42 Page - 2 - Business Unit ARENA ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GRILL GRILL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES ` IL CITY OF EDINA 7 /6 /2uu6 8:07:42 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 3 7/6/2006 - 7/6/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 286085 7/6/2006 101405 ASSET RECOVERY CORP. 105.88 RECYCLING SERVICES 139623 6507692 -IN 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 105.88 286086 716/2006 106015 ATHLETICA INC. 8,520.00 GAMEPLEX RINK SYSTEM 00007040 139539 SO- 8630 -2 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 8,520.00 286087 716/2006 101954 AUGIE'S INC. 59.27 FOOD 00006324 139373 6247 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 59.27 286088 7/6/2006 105281 BALCH & COMPANY 1,500.00 TV SHOW & WEBSITE 139250 622 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 1,500.00 286089 7/6/2006 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 3,560.00 SANITARY SEWER MODEL 139444 2327673 -6 5932.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL STORM SEWER 693.00 STORM WATER MGMT 139445 2327354 -140 5932.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL STORM SEWER 4,253.00 286090 7/6/2006 102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC. 102.59 TRACTOR BATTERY 139374 C1053 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 200.33 BATTERIES 00001528 139484 C1054 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 123.67 BATTERIES 00001532 139485 C1094 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 426.59 286091 7/6/2006 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 371,88 139323 37492400 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,063.50 139324 37492200 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 24.10 139325 41687400 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 79,26 139326 41687300 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 715.35 139327 37492500 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 139.95 139328 41687500 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 23.10 139630 41706400 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 216.03 139631 41672000 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 103.16 139632 41706300 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 182,10 139633 37533400 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 97.10 139634 37533500 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,015.53 286092 7/6/2006 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS R55CKREG LOG20000 BELTS, FILTERS 00001716 CITY OF EDINA 882375 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT Council Check Register GEN 61.56 IDLER ASSEMBLY 00001718 716/2006 --7/6/2006 1553.6530 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 174.12 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003019 139188 WO- 409303 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 18.64 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003019 139189 W0409303-2 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 4.25 HIGHLIGHTERS 139251 W0409462-2 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 8.35 OFFICE SUPPLIES 139252 WO- 409730 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 26.27 DUSTERS, POST -IT -NOTES 00001929 139375 WO- 409875 -1 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 81.47 FUSER 00001925 139376 OE- 58907 -1 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 40.51 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003607 139486 OE- 58621 -1 1470.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 43.45 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003023 139540 W0410072 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 143.71 INK CARTRIDGES 00003023 139541 OE- 60346 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 73.43 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003019 139542 W0409303-3 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 73.43 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003019 139543 OE- 58878 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 687.63 286093 7/6/2006 102392 BLACK, STEVE 7/612006 8:07:42 Page - 4 - Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING DISTRIBUTION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 279.00 OFFICIATING FEES 139607 063006 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 279.00 286094 716/2006 119431 BLINK BONNIE 134.47 BOX LUNCHES 139253 062006 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 134.47 286095 716/2006 100711 BLOOD, DAVID 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 139176 070106 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 286096 7/6/2006 119631 BONNER & BORHART LLP 14,906.25 PROSECUTING 139446 27339 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES 14,906.25 286097 7/6/2006 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 131.14 BELTS, FILTERS 00001716 139190 882375 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 61.56 IDLER ASSEMBLY 00001718 139191 882922 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 26.84 CLAMP 00001719 139192 883412 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 28.54 HORN ASSEMBLY 00001529 139193 884025 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 127.80 - CREDIT 00001524 139194 879066CR 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 120.28 286098 7/6/2006 104470 BRIDGESTONE GOLF INC. 136.92 GOLF BALLS 00006104 139254 1001356030 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 136.92 286099 7/6/20' 100776 BUTLER, GEORGE 7/6,_ , 8:07:42 Page - 5 Business Unit RESERVE PROGRAM COMMUNICATIONS 3,769.35 139329 100978 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER R55CKREG LOG20000 73.30 139330 CITY OF -NA 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 152.10 Council Check Register 100977 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 7/612006 -7/6/2006 139332 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 21.60 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 139175 070106 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,014.04 100.00 062206 1551.6186 HEAT 286100 71612006 5590919 -6 139377 115346 CALHOUN BEACH FRAMING 7413.6582 FUEL OIL 2,073.55 133.75 PHOTO CONTEST FRAMING 139544 062906 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 286104 7/6/2006 133.75 ADVERTISING OTHER 242.00 286101 7/6/2006 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 286107 716/2006 7/6,_ , 8:07:42 Page - 5 Business Unit RESERVE PROGRAM COMMUNICATIONS 3,769.35 139329 100978 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 73.30 139330 100979 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 152.10 139331 100977 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 7143.50 139332 100976 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 11,138.25 286102 716/2006 100681 CATCO 100256 CINGULAR WIRELESS 88.98 FITTINGS 00001518 139255 3 -06616 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 88.98 5420.6188 TELEPHONE 22.67 286103 7/6/2006 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 286106 71612006 21.60 5596524 -8 139257 2006JUN19 5430.6186 HEAT 2,014.04 5591458 -4 139258 062206 1551.6186 HEAT 37.91 5590919 -6 139377 6/22/06 7413.6582 FUEL OIL 2,073.55 ADVERTISING OTHER 80.68 ADVERTISING 139195 286104 7/6/2006 119725 CH15AGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO ADVERTISING OTHER 242.00 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN RICHARDS GOLF COURSE CITY HALL GENERAL PSTF FIRE TOWER 482 50 139333 315232 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 482.50 286105 71612006 100256 CINGULAR WIRELESS 22,67 139256 061706 5420.6188 TELEPHONE 22.67 286106 71612006 103040 CITY PAGES 80.66 ADVERTISING 139195 100158411 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 80.66 ADVERTISING 139195 100158411. 5642.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 80.68 ADVERTISING 139195 100158411 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 242.00 286107 716/2006 116158 CLARK, ANN. CLUB HOUSE 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 131.00 SKATING CLASS REFUND 139488 062806 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 131.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA - Council Check. Register 7/6/2006 --7/6/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 286108 716/2006 110691. CLARK, ROBERT E. 11.00 DOG LICENSE REFUND 139487 062906 1400.4120 DOG LICENSES 11.00 286109 7/612006 100088 COLE INFORMATION SERVICES 328.95 LEASE DIRECTORY 139196 0432260 -IN 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 328.95 286110 7/612006 101345 COLOURS 493.00 FLYER DESIGN 139545 9578 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 493.00 286111 7/612006 118457 COLUMBIA HEIGHTS PARK & REC 15.38 REFUND 139546 062806 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE 236.62 REFUND 139546 062806 5301.4541 GENERAL ADMISSIONS 252.00 286112 7/612006 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 275.09 GLOVES, EARPLUGS 00001875 139547 02842911 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 69.83 SAFETY GLASSES, LOTION 00001899 139548 02844964 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 344.92 286113 7/612006 103171 CORPORATE ADVERTISING & INCENT 324.69 NAME TAGS 139197 97918 5311.6201 LAUNDRY 324.69 286114 7/6/2006 119953 CREATIVE RESOURCES AGENCY LLC 619.52 T- SHIRTS 139619 9121 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 619.52 286115 716/2006 119899 CREEKSIDE SOILS 1,680.81 MULCH 00001778 139489 22442 -9598 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES 1,680.81 286116 7/612006 119933 DATA DEVICES INTERNATIONAL 2,590.00 HD/TAPE DEGAUSSER 00004366 139198 7397 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 2,590.00 286117 71612006 102285 DAVANNIS 62.25 FOOD FOR VP MOTORCADE 139199 167979 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 62.25 7/6/2006 8:07:42 Page - 6 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING POOL OPERATION PLAYGROUND & THEATER TREES & MAINTENANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CITY Oh -,iNA 7/6,_. _. 8:07:42 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 7 7/6/2006 -- 7/6/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description - Business Unit 286118 7/6/2006 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING 1,028.00 139334 367967 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 19.80 139335 367968 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 261.00 139336 367274 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 19.80 139337 367971 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,938.54 139338 367970 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 4,790.90 139635 367964 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 58.80 139636 367965 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 11,116.84 286119 7/6/2006 102455 DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES INC 177.32 STEPS FOR FORD VAN 00001459 139259 4- 097440 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 177.32 286120 716/2006 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 97.60 BAKERY 139260 218223 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 38.58 BAKERY 139549 218676 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 59.62 BAKERY 139550 218746 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 195.80 286121 7/6/2006 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST 469.30 139551 304855544 5610.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 18.00 139552 304855498 5430.6188 TELEPHONE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 108.80 139552 304855498 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 132.50 139552 304855498 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 728.60 286122 7/6/2006 101766 DISPLAY SALES 429.20 FLAGS 00001772 139261 INVO044725 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 429.20 286123 7/6/2006 119943 DOCHERTY, PATRICIA 81.00 SKATING CLASS REFUND 139490 062806 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 81.00 286124 7/6/2006 102934 DON HARSTAD CO INC 298.80 CARD READER 00001303 139262 122047. 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 298.80 286125 7/6/2006 119934 DONALDSON COMPANY INC. 605.50 REPAIR FILTERS 00008046 139200 4627461 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 605.50 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/6/2006 -7/612 006 7/6/2006 8:07:42 Page - 8 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 286126 716/2006 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 9,250.30 LEGAL 139553 1327716 1195.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES 9,250.30 286127 7/6/2006 100739 EAGLE WINE 200.50 139339 427905 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 289.61 139637 431602 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 913.01 139638 431607 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING - 34.40 139639 431606 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,579.92 139640 431597 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 543.40 139641 431398 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 8.65- 139642 696287 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 14.63- 139643 696110 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5,537.56 286128 7/6/2006 100741 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 55.00 139340 672339 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,680.00 139341 320675 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 290.20 139378 219554 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 622.00 139379 18773 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 48.00 139644 320761 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 7,216.10 139645 320649 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 74.50 139646 320743 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,589.45 139647 320742 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,260.15 139648 320740 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 18.50 139649 320738 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 16,853.90 286129 7/612006 105467 EDINA CRIME PREVENTION FUND 3,700.00 ART FAIR CREDIT CARD RECEIPTS 139263 062806 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 3,700.00 286130 716/2006 114520 EIDEM, JOHN 56.25 LIQUOR DECOY 139554 062806 1424.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR INSPECTION 56.25 286131 716/2006 105944 EMANUEL, LOU 279.00 OFFICIATING FEES 139608 063006 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 279.00 286132 716/20 101956 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANC CITY OF __AA 7/6t. _ R55CKREG LOG20000 _8:07:42 CouncilCheck.Register Page- 9 7/6/2006 -7/6/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 474.20 T -90 PUMP REPAIRS 139491 26308 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 923.80 E -81 PUMP REPAIRS 139492 26295 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1.398.00 286133 716/2006 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC 98.35 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003590 139493 INV842578 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 98.35 286134 7/612006 105339 ENRGI 356.25 WEBSITE GRAPHICS 139201 4488 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 772.50 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 139555 4492 2210.6124 - WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 1.128.75 286135 716/2006 116303 ETONIC WORLDWIDE LLC 168.45 MERCHANDISE 00006110 139380 52418 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 168.45 286136 716/2006 102179 EULL'S MANUFACTURING CO INC. 291.80 MANHOLE BRICK 00001506 139381 65684 5932.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL STORM SEWER 507.77 CATCH BASINS 00001663 139382 65891 5932.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL STORM SEWER 799.57 286137 716/2006 104832 EVENT SOUND & LIGHTING 138.45 SPEAKER REPAIRS 00001840 139494 742 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 138.45 286138 71612006 100756 FEDERAL EXPRESS 27.52 SHIPPING CHARGES 139202 1- 077 -64893 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 27.52 286139 7/6/2006 100759 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY 58.04 KEY BOXES 00001915 139495 52649 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 58.05 KEY BOXES 00001915 139495 52649 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 116.09 286140 716/2006 115314 GALAXY COMPUTER INC. 639.00 FUSER KITS 139556 1302 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 639.00 286141 7/6/2006 101270 GANDER MOUNTAIN 495.77 UNIFORMS 139496 361 -7728 1640.6201 LAUNDRY PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 495.77 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/6/2006 8:07:42 Council Check Register Page - 10 7/6/2006 --7/6/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description - Business Unit 286142 7/6/2006 102419 GARDEN & ASSOCIATES INC 330.00 INTERPRETER 139203 47358 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 330.00 286143 7/6/2006 119945 GEBHARDT, SUSAN 172.00 SKATING CLASS REFUND 139497 062806 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 172.00 286144 7/6/2006 105508 GEMPLER'S INC. 299.00 ROLLING MEASURE, HOSE RACK 00002192 139557 1008109805 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 299.00 286145 71612006 101344 GLENN REHBEIN COMPANIES 1,192.80 FERTILIZER 00001749 139264 9789 1643.6540 FERTILIZER GENERAL TURF CARE 1,192.80 286146 716/2006 119936 GLOBAL OAK 975.00 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 139204 325 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 975.00 286147 7/6/2006 100779 GOPHER CASH REGISTER 31.95 PAPER ROLLS 00006303 139383 24903 5430.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 253.47 REGISTER PAPER 00006315 139558 24908 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 285.42 286148 7/612006 102645 GRAFFITI CONTROL SERVICES 800.00 REMOVE PAINT SPILL 00001900 139498 00001417 1642.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIELD MAINTENANCE 800.00 286149 7/6/2006 101103 GRAINGER 141.99 V -BELT, FUSES 00008056 139205 9123821598 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 34.97 V -BELTS 00008060 139206 9123738065 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 16.15 PAINT 00001874 139265 9126570150 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 71.01 SPRAY PAINT 00001874 139384 9126570176 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 19.00 BATTERIES 00001873 139385 9126570168 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 169.23 SPOTLIGHTS 00001873 139385 9126570168 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 452.35 286150 716/2006 102599 GRANITE CITY ROOFING 223.00 ROOF REPAIRS 00005426 139386 60047 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 223.00 CITY OF -.nNA 7 /61.__., 8:07:42 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 11 7/6/2006 --7/6/2006 Check # Date Amount Suppller / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description - Business Unit 286151 7/6/2006 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 916.25 139342 82747 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 183.50 139650 82922 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 167.50 139651 82961 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 563.50 139652 82921 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,830.75 286152 7/6/2006 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 30.03 INDUSTRIAL TAPE 00001809 139387 918270833 5911.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUMP 8 LIFT STATION OPER 30.03 286153 7/6/2006 100785 GREUPNER, JOE 10,050.00 3RD QTR RETAINER 139266 062706 5410.6132 PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION 10,050.00 286154 7/6/2006 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 1,107.44 139343 431604 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 34.40 139344 431603 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 3,559.72 139345 428123 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5,305.15 139346 424648 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 193.75- 139347 696178 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 111.75- 139348 695802 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 25.95- 139349 696299 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 4.50 139653 431550 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 8.10 139654 431549 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 91.44 139655 431599 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 31.90 139656 428120 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 61.67 139657 428122 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,036.81 139658 431600 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 339.89 139659 431609 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,302.62 139660 431610 5842.5512 COST OF GOQDS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 243.53- 139661 696361 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING ' 16,308.66 286155 7/612006 103359 HANSON PIPE & PRODUCTS INC. 552.74 BASE SLAB, CATCH BASIN 00001907 139388 477006396624 5932.6536 CASTINGS GENERAL STORM SEWER 276.90 CATCH BASIN 00001908 139389 477006396700 5932.6536 CASTINGS GENERAL STORM SEWER 829.64 286156 7/6/2006 100797 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT 1,408.36 POOL CHEMICALS 00007093 139499 820117 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/6/2006 8:07:42 Council Check Register Page - 12 — 716/2006 —7/6/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description - -- Business Unit 1,408.36 286157 7/6/2006 119474 HAY DOBBS 2,189.09 ARCHITECT FEE 139618 6004.002 -2 45008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION 2,189.09 286156 716/2006 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 2,557.52 MAY 2006 139447 001464 1195.6225 BOARD & ROOM PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES 2,557.52 286159 7/6/2006 106371 HENNEPIN FACULTY ASSOCIATES 2,265.17 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES 139182 070106 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,265.17 286160 7/6/2006 100805 HIRSHFIELD'S 14.90 PAINT 00001877 139207 003165499 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 140.71 PAINT 00006311 139267 003166206 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 74.53 SEALER 00001886 139390 003165729 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 230.14 286161 7/6/2006 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURI 476.06 FIELD MARKING PAINT 00005874 139268 72008 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 476.06 286162 7/612006 119950 HORAN- HENGEL, MEGAN 1.09 REFUND, 139559 062906 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 16.91 REFUND 139559 062906 5301.4541 GENERAL ADMISSIONS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 18.00 286163 7/6/2006 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS 339.98 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 139269 062206 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 339.98 2861.64 7/612006 102114 HUEBSCH 37.96 RUG CLEANING 139560 651220 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 37.90 286165 7/612006 104822 HYDRO LOGIC 222.87 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001834 139270 0232036 -IN 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 62.80 CLAMPS, CRIMPER 00001777 139271 0231758 -IN 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 285.67 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY L. -iNA Council Check Register 7/6/2006 -7/6/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 286166 7/6/2006 100812. IAAO 175.00 DUES - DIANE KOOLE 139208 062706 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 7 /t- 8:07:42 Page - 13 175.00 286167 716/2006 112628 ICEE COMPANY, THE 1,137.90 CONCESSION PRODUCT 139272 739507 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 1,137.90 286168 716/2006 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 258.88 PVC PIPE, FITTINGS 00001895 139391 440695 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 258.88 286169 7/6/2006 101732 INDUSTRIAL DOOR CO. INC. 102.50 DOOR SERVICE 139561 0113817 -IN 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 259.18 DOOR ADJUSTMENTS 139562 0113837 -IN 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 361.68 286170 716/2006 101400 JAMES, WILLIAM F 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 139180 070106 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 286172 716/2006 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 62.50 139662 1095188 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 54.33 139663 1098821 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 371.10 139664 1098819 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 323.86 139665 1098823 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 190.56 139666 1098810 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 605.71 139667 1098808 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,713.89 139668 1098811 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,276.71 139669 1098807 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,761.49 139670 1098813 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 206.12 139671 1098812 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,256.48 139672 1098815 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,424.67 139673 1098817 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,164.71 139674 1098822 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 161.55 139675 1098820 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 4,659.48 139676 1098818 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 605.71 139677 1098809 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,825,97 139678 .1099804 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 475.45 139679 1098802 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 366.67 139680 1098800 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING .69 139681 1098804 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/6/2006 8:07:42 Council Check Register Page - 14 7/6/2006 -- 7/6/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Suble_dger Account Description Business Unit 233.68 139682 1098801 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 34.02 139683 1098806 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 506.18 139684 1098805 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,066.79 139685 1098803 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 10.67- 139686 314623 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 10.67- 139687 314666 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 6.89- 139688 314667 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 30,340.09 286173 7/6/2006 106243 K9 STORM INCORPORATED 1,860.35 CUSTOMS BROKERAGE FEES 139448 VS3042 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 1,860.35 286174 716/2006 103449 KAMPA, TINA 218.45 PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES 139500 062906 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 218.45 286175 716/2006 100553 KEEHR, GREGORY 46.21 TASTING CUPS 139209 062606 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 76.90 TASTING CUPS 139209 062606 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 123.11 286176 7/6/2006 111018 KEEPRS INC. 224.80 UNIFORMS 00003612 139501 54252 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 135.80 UNIFORMS 00003538 139502 54061 -01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 490.80 UNIFORMS 0 00003538 139503 54061 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 851.40 286177 716/2006 119940 KELLY, RAY 26.10 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 139449 062806 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 26.10 286178 7/6/2006 119768 KEOMED INC. 1,061.35 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003555 139504 IVC10045 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,061.35 . 286179 7/6/2006 118397 KLEIN UNDERGROUND LLC 2,400.00 WATER HOLE RESTORATION 00001871 139392 21890 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 2,350.00 WATER HOLE RESTORATION 00001876 139393 21891 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 4,750.00 286180 7/6/20' 100002 KLM ENGINEERING INC. R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF ruINA Council Check Register 7/6/2006 - 7/6/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 17,125.00 FIELD INSPECTION 139450 2949 05435.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 7/61- 8:07:42 Page - 15 Business Unit VANVALK WATER TOWER REHAB 17,125.00 286181 7/6/2006 119952 KOHS, HEATHER 421.15 CHEER CLINIC FEES 139620 063006 1600.4390.25 CHEERLEEDING CAMP PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 421.15 286182 7/6/2006 119947 KRAEMER MINING & MATERIALS INC - 583.43 RIVER ROCK 00001878 139505 174996 5913.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK DISTRIBUTION 583.43 286183 71612006 114522 KRULL, JOHN 41.25 LIQUOR DECOY 139563 062806 1424.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR INSPECTION 41.25 286184 7/6/2006 101220 LAND EQUIPMENT INC. 1,437.75 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 00001923 139394 149291 5913.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL DISTRIBUTION 1,437.75 286185 716/2006 102111 LASER TECHNOLOGY INC. 107.04 LASER REPAIR 139210 39900RI 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 107.04 286186 7/6/2006 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 313.06 CLAMPS, SCREWS, TY -RAP 00001812 139395 4556798 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 410.83 WASHERS, HOSE, WIRE 00001812 139396 4556799 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 99.22 DRILL BITS 00001812 139397 4556800 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 276.83 HOSE CLAMPS, FITTINGS 00001901 139564 4573965 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,099.94 286187 7/6/2006 100853 LEEF SERVICES 33.21 SHOP TOWELS 139398 1158171 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 33.21 286188 7/6/2006 100855 LESCO INC. 92.12 SEED 00001428 139506 14089750 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT DISTRIBUTION 22.24 MULCH 00001792 139507 14205938 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT DISTRIBUTION 87.33 SEED 00001782 139508 14205839 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT DISTRIBUTION 606.18 FUNGICIDE 00006462 139509 06E92EFE 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 241.92 CEASEFIRE 00006446 139510 DCF4AFAA 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,049.79 R55CKREG LOG20000 7/6/2006 1190.6105 CITY OF EDINA 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS Council Check Register DUES - LIZ LOPEZ 139511 062906 7/6/2006 --716/2006 10.00 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 286189 716/2006 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 139511 062906 854.77 65.00 139350 203006 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 914.82 CANDY 139351 203084 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,845.93 286191 139689 200744 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 1,263.98 139690 203340 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 38.03- 139565 139691 203340CR 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 286190 7/6/2006 1190.6105 114593 MAAP 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 10.00 DUES - LIZ LOPEZ 139511 062906 10.00 DUES - MITZI WICKLUND 139511 062906 65.00 CONFERENCE FEE 139511 062906 65.00 CONFERENCE FEE 139511 062906 150.00 286191 7/6/2006 119951 MACK, SAM 56.25 LIQUOR DECOY 139565 062806 56.25 286192 7/6/2006 100868 MARK VII SALES 2,986.69 139352 962515 36.90 139353 962516 4,575.25 139354 963144 36.90 139355 963145 59.85 139356 963146 1,475.75 139692 963644 2,807.70 139693 962789 2,563.22 139694 965463 77.00 139695 965464 14,619.26 286193 7/6/2006 102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC 170.00 ADD EXTENSION 139273 31757 62.50 PROGRAM CHANGE 139274 31777 232.50 286194 7/6/2006 101146 MATRIX TELECOM INC. 265.19 139275 005456301 265.19 286195 71612006 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 1424.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5822.5514 5822.5515 5842.5514 5842.5515 5842.5514 5862.5514 5862.5514 5822.5514 5822.5514 1550.6188 1550.6188 1550.6188 2,553.75 LAKE SUPERIOR TRIP 139566 062206 1628.6103.07 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST.OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TRIPS PROF SERVICES 7/6/2006 8:07:42 Page - 16 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING POOL CONCESSIONS YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING ASSESSING ASSESSING ASSESSING ASSESSING LIQUOR INSPECTION 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL SENIOR CITIZENS CITY OF ­NA 7/61- 8:07:42 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 17 7/6/2006 --716/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Descrlption - Business Unit 2,553.75 286196 7/612006 101457 MEICHSNER, EARL 98.79 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT. 139276 062306 1652.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE WEED MOWING 98.79 286197 71612006 101483 MENARDS 226.59 SIDING 00001867 139211 35903 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 10.61 OUTDOOR REMOTE 00006304 139277 36656 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 237.20 286198 7/612006 101987 MENARDS 43.95 RUBBER GLOVES, REMOVER 00002024 139567 3560 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 26.50 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 00002200 139568 3620 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 30.15 SANDPAPER 00002200 139569 2792 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 48.08 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 00002202 139570 3837 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 66.96 ELECTRICAL WIRE 00002202 139571 4414 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 215.64 286199 7/6/2006 100882 MERIT SUPPLY 113.53 LPS I 00001787 139212 69727 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,322.72 CLEANER, WASH S WAX 00001453 139572 69792 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 192.55 DEGREASER 00001911 139573 69791 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 2,628.80 286200 716/2006 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 536.12 FIELD PAINT 00001747 139278 92202 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 221.31 FIELD PAINT, BB PLATES 00001767 139279 92271 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 97.87 FIELD PAINT 00001770 139280 92187 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER - FIELD MAINTENANCE 35.09 BALL HOPPER 139512 92216 1623.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TENNIS INSTRUCTION 890.39 286201 7/6/2006 100885 METRO SALES INC 8,342.15 COPIER 00003592 139513 258948 1470.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 750.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 139514 219687 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 9,092.15 286202 7/6/2006 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 440.55 ASPHALT 00005909 139515 . 80571MB 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 11,198.57 ASPHALT 00005909-139515 80571MB 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 11,639.12 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/6/2006 8:07:42 Council Check Register Page - 18 7/6/2006 -7/6/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanatlon PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 286203 7/6/2006 100692 MIDWEST COCA -COLA EAGAN 332.00 139357 68061808 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 230.40 139696 68061907 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 562.40 286204 7/612006 103186 MIDWEST FUELS 384.55 DIESEL FUEL 00006071 139399 36797 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 491.07 DIESEL FUEL 00006071 139400 36446 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 775.67 FUEL 00006070 139401 36444 5423.6406 tENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF CARS 843.97 FUEL 00006070 139402 36795 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 2,495.26 286205 7/6/2006 101890 MIDWEST VENDING INC 192.08 CANDY 00006338 139574 4617 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 192.08 286206 7/6/2006 100522 MINNESOTA AIR INC. 96.32 LOW PRESSURE CONTROL 00001872 139403 2067616-00 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 96.32 286207 7/612006 118144 MINNESOTA PREMIER PUBLICATIONS 825.00 PARK & REC AD 139575 13881 2210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER COMMUNICATIONS 825.00 286208 7/6/2006 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. 596.40 ASPHALT EMULSION 00005924 139213 50553 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 596.40 ASPHALT EMULSION. 00005924 139516 50615 1314.6519 ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION 1,192.80 286209 7/612006 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER 36.38 VALVES 00002015 139576 0069318 -IN 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 94.00 STEEL SHELF 00003621 139577 0069402 -IN 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 130.38 286210 716/2006 119770 MONEY MAILER TC SOUTHWEST 380.00 DIRECT MAIL ADVERTISING 139451 195 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 380.00 DIRECT MAIL ADVERTISING 139451 195 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 380.00 DIRECT MAIL ADVERTISING 139451 195 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 1,140.00 286211 716/2006 119547 MOON, JENNI 48.07 OFFICE SUPPLIES 139452 062706 5310.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POOL ADMINISTRATE' R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF --ANA Council Check Register 716/2006 --7/6/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 48.07 286212 71612006 102395 MOSE, WILLIAM 488.25 OFFICIATING FEES 139609 063006 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 70- 8:07:42 - Page - 19 Business Unit EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CENTENNIAL LAKES GENERAL TURF CARE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL CONCESSIONS TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 488.25 286213 716/2006 100912 MOTOROLA INC. 2,153.07 MAR -MAY 06 SERVICE 139214 78021768 1400.6230 2,153.07 JUN -AUG 06 SERVICE 139215 78021769 1400.6230 4,306.14 286214 7/6/2006 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 201.93 VALVE BOXES, FUSES 00006454 139404 530095 -00 5422.6611 1,892.19 CONVERSION ASSEMBLIES 00006452 139405 529683 -00 5422.6611 271.58 SERVICE ASSEMBLIES, FUSES 00006454 139406 530095 -01 5422.6611 654.92 MOWER BLADES 00006442 139407 527979 -00 5422.6530 1,202.32 ROLLERS 00006453 139408 530005 -00 5422.6530 553.90 SERVICE ASSEMBLIES 00006454 139409 530095 -02 5422.6611 444.59 SERVICE ASSEMBLIES 00006454 139410 530095 -03 5422.6611 324.74 IRRIGATION PARTS 00002032 139578 532635 -00 5630.6530 36.74 TEES, TOOLS 00001745 139579 528988 -00 1643.6530 5,582.91 286215 7/6/2006 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 1,883.00 139697 38272 5862.5513 445.00 139698 38270 5822.5513 762.00 139699 38271 5842.5513 3,090.00 286216 7/6/2006 103632 NEXT DAY GOURMET /SUPERIOR PROD. 2,524.05 FREEZER 00007108 139453 8365251 5320.6406 2,524.05 286217 7/6/2006 104672 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 443.87 139216 909583317 -055 1400.6188 421.83 139615 757391129 -043 1470.6188 865.70 286218 7/6/2006 100724 NISSEN, DICK 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 139179 070106 1419.6102 100.00 70- 8:07:42 - Page - 19 Business Unit EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CENTENNIAL LAKES GENERAL TURF CARE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL CONCESSIONS TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/6/2006 8:07:42 Council Check Register Page - 20 7/6/2006 - 7/6/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 286219 716/2006 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY 230.84 LIGHT BAR 00001922 139281 10594 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 230.84 286220 71612006 100712 NORTHERN WATERWORKS SUPPLY 850.10 STORZ ADAPTORS 00001487 139517 SO 1020323.001 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 850.10 286221 7/6/2006 100930 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO. 193.33 TIRE SERVICES 00001644 139217 NW- 102036 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 114.40 REPAIRS 00001644 139518 NW- 101895 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 307.73 286222 7/6/2006 102712 OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOG 495.87 139282 W06050552 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 17.98 ARNESON 139283 W06050545 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 35.96 GREENHOUSE 139283 W06050545 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 71.92 139283 W06050545 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 73.18 139283 W06050545 5311.6188 TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION 89.90 CARD ACCESS -PARKS 139283 W06050545 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 89.90 139283 W06050545 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 89.90 139283 W06050545 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 90.23 HISTORICAL 139283 W06050545 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 107.88 139283 W06050545 1481.6188 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION 118.46 139283 W06050545 5210.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF DOME PROGRAM 119.69 139283 W06050545 5111.6188 TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 143.84 139283 W06050545 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 161.92 139283 W06050545 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 432.57 139283 W06050545 5610.6188 TELEPHONE ED ADMINISTRATION 2,139.20 286223 7/6/2006 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 51.07 TURNBUCKLES 00001826 139284 399855 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 95.43 RECIPROCATING BLADES 00001820 139285 399335 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 419.89 ROPE, EYEBOLTS, CLIPS 00001830 139519 400189 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 566.39 286224 7/6/2006 101470 ORVIS, JOAN 7,702.00 SKATING INSTRUCTOR 139520 062806 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 7,702.00 286225 7/6/20' 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 286226 7/6/2006 CITY G, ,,NA 5421.5510 7/6,_ , 8:07:42 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD Council Check Register Page - 21 32385181 7/6/2006 -7/6/2006 139411 Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 675.88 139358 8112437 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 780.81 139700 8113101 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 288.00 139701 8112962 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,183.34 139702 8113102 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,313.72 139703 8113100 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 286226 7/6/2006 5430.5510 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 115.50 139359 32385181 392.50 139411 32385172 1,233.50 139412 36213075 459.20 139580 32385164 2,200.70 286227 7/612006 119938 PERMATOP 128.25 TOOL BOX COVER 00001338 139286 4190 128.25 286228 7/6/2006 119935 PET CROSSING 83.00 K -9 DENTAL EXAM 139218 86475 83.00 286229 71612006 102406 PETSMART #458 58.58 K -9 GROOMING 00003025 139219 T -7093 58.58 286230 7/6/2006 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 2,256.99 139704 2344425 94.56 139705 2344423 1,093.31 139706 2344422 671.99 139707 2344420 1,775.26 139708 2344421 1,718.56 139709 2344419 370.85 139710 2344424 485.19 139711 2344418 1,378.73 139712 2344416 223.58 139713 2344417 144.00 - 139714 3340825 286231 7/6/2006 100119 PING 1,119.39 IRONS SETS 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1646.6556 TOOLS 4607.6406 4607.6406 5862.5513 5862.5515 5862.5513 5842.5512 5842.5513 5842.5513 5862.5512 5822.5513 5822.5513 5822.5512 5842.5513 00006298 139413 8087839 5440.5511 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE POOL CONCESSIONS RICHARDS GOLF COURSE GRILL CENTENNIAL LAKES BUILDING MAINTENANCE EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/6/2006 8:07:42 Council Check Register Page - 22 7/6/2006 - 7/6/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 454.02 GRIPS, METAL WOODS 00006298 139414 8081231 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,573.41 286232 7/6/2006 101110 POLLY NORMAN PHOTOGRAPHY 150.00 ABOUT BUSINESS PHOTOS 139581 062206 2210.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 150.00 286233 7/612006 100961 POSTMASTER 500.00 BRM PERMIT 139287 062706 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 500.00 286234 716/2006 100961 POSTMASTER 500.00 BRM POSTAGE 139521 062906 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 500.00 286235 7/6/2006 100961 POSTMASTER 1,260.00 EDINA ART CENTER 139621 063006 5110.6235 POSTAGE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,260.00 286236 7/6/2006 101434 PRAIRIE EQUIPMENT COMPANY 399.39 REPAIR INVERTER 00001447 139415 4756 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 399.39 286237 7/612006 100964 PRECISION TURF & CHEMICAL 2,130.00 FUNGICIDE 00006448 139416 27340 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,130.00 286238 71612006 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 497.54 139360 431605 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,292.62 139715 431601 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,298,01 139716 431611 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 45.67- 139717 696328 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5,042.50 286239 7/612006 100969 PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING ENGINEE 1,475.00 WELL #2 RECONSTRUCT 139454 05023.10 05450.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION WM-450 3,013.67 RECYCLE TANK INSPECTION 139455 03034.32 05427.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION PLANT #3 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYST 3,500.00 RECYCLE TANK INSPECTION 139455 03034.32 05425.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION PLANT #2 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYST 3,500.00 RECYCLE TANK INSPECTION 139455 03034.32 05426.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION PLANT #4 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYST 11,488.67 286240 7/6/20' 1117721 PROSOURCE EDUCATIONAL SERVICES R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 286241 716/2006 286242 716/2006 286243 716/2006 286244 7/6/2006 286245 71612006 286246 7/612006 CITY OF _..ANA Council Check Register 7/6/2006 --7/6/2006 Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1,443.75 COMPUTER CONSULTING 139582 6061443 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,443.75 70-- 8:07:42 Page - 23 - Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5511.6250 ALARM SERVICE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 5310.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL ADMINISTRATION 5862.5513 103094 PROTECTION ONE VERNON SELLING 5822.5512 127.80 12743654 ALARM SERVICE 00008062 139220 061206 127.80 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5822.5513 101877 PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY 5842.5512 5.31 COBRA 139583 063006 5.31 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 104669 PURE BLUE YORK SELLING 5862.5513 350.48 RETAIL ITEMS 139584 70147 350.48 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5514 100971 QUALITY WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5512 2,467.35 VERNON SELLING 139361 725184 -00 274.27 5862.5513 139362 725118 -00 162.30 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 139363 724801 -00 228.00 YORK SELLING 139364 721779 -00 113.15- 139365 712010 -00 3,311.26 139718 725117 -00 1,790.85 139719 724154 -00 753.51 139720 724812 -00 367.45 139721 724693 -00 73.15 139722 724695-00 1,411.77 139723 724814 -00 1,527.50 139724 724156 -00 32.34 139725 724155 -00 2,345.53 139726 725138 -00 455.75- 139727 723490-00 28.51- 139728 716550 -00 28.67- 139729 721547 -00 84.10- 139730 716548 -00 14,035.10 101965 QWEST 112.20 952 920 -8166 139522 8166 -6/06 112.20 100466 R & R PRODUCTS INC. 775.00 VERTI -CUT UNIT 00006445 139417 CD848983 70-- 8:07:42 Page - 23 - Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5511.6250 ALARM SERVICE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 5310.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL ADMINISTRATION 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/6/2006 -7/6/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 148.97 CUP CUTTER PARTS 00006456 139418 CD849256 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 923.97 286247 716/2006 113422 RAKE PUBLISHING INC. 7/6/2006 8:07:42 Page - 24 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 200.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 139585 8763 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 200.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 139585 8763 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 200.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 139585 8763 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 600.00 - 286248 7/6/2006 102631 REAMER, MARK 837.00 OFFICIATING FEES 139610 063006 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 837.00 286249 716/2006 119755 RICCI, PATRICE 139.50 OFFICIATING FEES 139611 063006 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 139.50 286250 716/2006 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 229.15 TOILET REPAIRS 00002030 139586 43175 5630.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES 229.15 286251 7/612006 101902 RINK SYSTEMS INC 670.10 RINK SUPPLIES 00008035 139288 9807841 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 670.10 286252 7/6/2006 100985 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQ CO INC 61.24 BUSHINGS 00001905 139523 C43283 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EOUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 61.24 286253 716/2006 101634 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPANY 46.78 BAKERY 00006349 139419 157533 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 46.78 286254 7/6/2006 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 210.17 ROUND TABLES 139587 062906 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 319.32 CAMERA 139587 062906 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 22.50 139613 063006 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 41.93 139613 063006 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 593.92 286255 7/6/2006 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 112.21 LUMBER 00001766 139289 40321119 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENP' R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # . Date 286256 716/2006 286257 716/2006 286258 716/2006 286259 7/6/2006 286260 7/612006 286261 71612006 286262 7/6/2006 CITY OF __,,4A Council Check.Reglster 7/6/2006 --7/6/2006 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 79.77 LUMBER 00001868 139420 40321908 5932:6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 25.30 LUMBER 00001891 139421 40323667 05453.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES 217.28 CONSULTING DESIGN WM-451 Nine Mile Village 05451.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 119799 SCHIMETZ, SCOTT 05451.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 279.00 OFFICIATING FEES 139612 063006 279.00 CONSULTING INSPECTION STS -316 SUNNYSLOPE AREA CIPP 03413.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. 03428.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 399.27 QUARTERLY MAINTENANCE 139624 8101574989 399.27 CONSULTING INSPECTION WM-459 59TH ST RAW WATER LINE 01332.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 101961 SCHMITZ, THOMAS 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 36.47 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 139614 062606 197.00 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 139614 062606 233.47 100991 SCHWAB - VOLLHABER- LUBRATT 1,074.45 CONDENSING UNIT LEAK REPAIR 139293 060412 -002 1,074.45 119591 SCIPIONI, CHRISTINA 97.99 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 139746 070306 97.99 100995 SEH 1,448.79 NINE MILE - BID PREP 139456 0147027 451.29 NINE MILE BLVD - BID PREP 139457 0147028 4,680.99 NINE MILE BLVD - CONSTR 139458 0147030 21,624.15 NINE MILE - CONSTR 139459 0147029 515.41 CIPP INSPECTIONS 139460 0147033 1,000.00 CIPP INSPECTIONS 139460 0147033 1,000.00 CIPP INSPECTIONS 139460 0147033 396.06 59TH ST - BID PREP 139461 0147034 7,424.47 59TH ST - CONSTR 139462 0147031 5,062.98 CONSTR OBSERVATION 139463 0147032 43.00 CITYWORKS SOFTWARE 139464 0146817 43,647.14 119944 SELZLER, INA 149.00 SKATING CLASS REFUND 139524 062806 149.00 7/6_ 8:07:42 Page - 25 Business Unit GENERAL STORM SEWER Chemical Rm. Expanslon -plant 4 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 1550.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1470.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 05451.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN WM-451 Nine Mile Village 05451.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN WM-451 Nine Mile Village 05451.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION WM-451 Nine Mile Village 05451.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION WM-451 Nine Mile Village 04316.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION STS -316 SUNNYSLOPE AREA CIPP 03413.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO SS 03428.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION SS-428 SUNNYSLOPE AREA CIPP 05459.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN WM -459 59TH ST RAW WATER LINE 05459.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION WM-459 59TH ST RAW WATER LINE 01332.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -332 S. LAKE CORNELIA NBHOOD 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/612006 8:07:42 Council Check Register Page - 26 7/6/2006 --7/6/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 286263 716/2006 101587 SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES 2,535.00 DIAL -A -RIDE MAY 2006 139525 062806 1514.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DIAL -A -RIDE PROGRAM 2,535.00 286264 7/6/2006 100997 SESAC INC. 155.00 MUSIC LICENSE DUES 00008059 139221 2525888 5510.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENA ADMINISTRATION 155.00 286265 7/6/2006 102995 SHAPCO PRINTING INC. 511.20 NEWSLETTER 139588 143483 -01 2210.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 511.20 286266 7/6/2006 100998 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 6.80 PAINT THINNER 139422 4917-0 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 44.51 PAINT 00006435 139423 4916 -2 5430.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 51.31 286267 7/6/2006 118211 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 8.34 PAINT 00006435 139424 5749 -7 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 8.34 286268 7/6/2006 111824 SIDEKICK 717.01 PHOTO SCANNING 139465 2132 2210.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 717.01 286269 7/612006 100999 SIGNAL SYSTEMS INC. 82.27 TIME CARDS 00008057 139290 35639 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 82.27 286270 7/6/2006 119949 SIGNS BY TOMORROW 241.70 BANNERS 00003620 139589 1709 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 241.70 286271 71612006 106415 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY 4,325.40 MULTI -SPORT EVENT 139526 324617725 1624.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 4,325.40 286272 716/2006 116856 SPRINT 187.87 EVDO CONNECTION 139222 JUN1506 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 187.87 R55CKREG LOG20000 81.00 CITY OF _..ANA 286278 71612006 Council Check Register 101015 STREICHERS 7/6/2006 -7/6/2006 AMMO Check # Date . Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 286273 7/612006 1400.6203 101004 SPS COMPANIES 58.47 FLASHLIGHT, HOLSTER 00003024 139591 1360932 45.33 COUPLINGS, ADAPTORS 00001892 139425 S1468073.001 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 45.33 286279 7/6/2006 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 286274 716/2006 101016 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 33.75 HANDLE 00001717 139528 444842CVW 10,068.43 NE EDINA TRANS STUDY 139466 5523 -8 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 00001530 139.529 445826CVW 16,414.55 PRE DESIGN 139467 5656 -3 01313.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 22,954.17 PRE DESIGN 139468 5211 -17 07091.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 49,437.15 114.40 PUBLISH ORDINANCE 286275 716/2006 1120.6120 103283 ST. CROIX RECREATION CO INC 495.00 GRADUATION AD 1.39469 869424 201.29 VALVE ASSEMBLIES 00001750 139291 14892 1647.6530 REPAIR PARTS 105.44 CARTRIDGE & HOUSING 00001741 139590 14881 1642.6530 REPAIR PARTS 306.73 9.76 SEASON TICKET REFUND 286276 7/6/2006 5300.2039 119937 STEARNS COUNTY 150.24 SEASON TICKET REFUND 7/6,- - 8:07:42 Page- 27 - Business Unit CITY HALL GENERAL CONTINGENCIES BA- 313 70TH & METRO SIDEWALK INTERLACHEN /BLAKE PATHS & HARD SURFACE FIELD MAINTENANCE 30000 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 139223 062706 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 300.00 286277 7/612006 119942 STRAND, SHARON 8100 SKATING CLASS REFUND 139527 062806 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ADMINISTRATION COMMUNICATIONS AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 81.00 286278 71612006 101015 STREICHERS 1,610.38 AMMO 139224 1361053 1400.6551 AMMUNITION 127.75- CREDIT 139225 CM212851 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 58.47 FLASHLIGHT, HOLSTER 00003024 139591 1360932 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 1,541.10 286279 7/6/2006 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 33.75 HANDLE 00001717 139528 444842CVW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 82.70 HOSE ASSEMBLY 00001530 139.529 445826CVW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 116.45 286280 716/2006 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 114.40 PUBLISH ORDINANCE 139292 869308 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 495.00 GRADUATION AD 1.39469 869424 2210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 609.40 286281 7/6/2006 119939 SWAN, KEVIN 9.76 SEASON TICKET REFUND 139294 062606 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE 150.24 SEASON TICKET REFUND 139294 062606 5301.4532 SEASON TICKETS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ADMINISTRATION COMMUNICATIONS AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 716/2006 -716/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO #, Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 160.00 286282 716/2006 100794 SWANSON, HAROLD 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 139178 070106 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.00 286283 7/6/2006 119864 SYSCO MINNESOTA 607.40 LINERS, TISSUE 139226 606241618 5311.6511 839.70 CONCESSION PRODUCT 139226 606241618 5320.5510 64.12- CREDIT 139227 2518460PU 5320.5510 94.40- CONCESSION PRODUCT 139228 2518488PU 5320.5510 466.82 CONCESSION PRODUCT 139592 606291749 5320.5510 5410.6406 1553.6585 5311.6180 5421.5514 5421.5514 5862.5515 5511.6406 1330.6530 `624.6406 CLEANING SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES ACCESSORIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 7/6/2006 8:07:42 Page - 28 RESERVE PROGRAM POOL OPERATION POOL CONCESSIONS POOL CONCESSIONS POOL CONCESSIONS POOL CONCESSIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POOL OPERATION GRILL GRILL VERNON SELLING ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS TRAFFIC SIGNALS PLAYGROUND & THE" 1,755.40 286284 716/2006 101027 TARGET 147.69 E/D CARDS, BATTERIES 00006285 139426 061806 147.69 286285 716/2006 101326 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO 331.60 CONNECTORS, LIGHTS 00001527 139229 28421 -00 331.60 286286 716/2006 105123 THEMESCAPES, INC. 160.00 REPAIR ZIP LINER 139230 .206122 -1 160.00 286287 7/6/2006 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 538.50 139427 415119 347.00 139428 23020 139.20 139731 415130 1,024.70 286288 7/6 /2006 101826 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORP. 315.00 QUARTERLY MAINTENANCE 00008061 139231 407440 315.00 286289 7/6/2006 103982 TRAFFIC CONTROL CORPORATION 2,318.66 TRAFFIC LAMPS 00001818 139232 21440 2,318.66 286290 7/6/2006 101042 TRIARCO 225.50 TIE DYE KITS 139233 109581 5410.6406 1553.6585 5311.6180 5421.5514 5421.5514 5862.5515 5511.6406 1330.6530 `624.6406 CLEANING SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES ACCESSORIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 7/6/2006 8:07:42 Page - 28 RESERVE PROGRAM POOL OPERATION POOL CONCESSIONS POOL CONCESSIONS POOL CONCESSIONS POOL CONCESSIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POOL OPERATION GRILL GRILL VERNON SELLING ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS TRAFFIC SIGNALS PLAYGROUND & THE" R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY 0. -NA Council Check Register 7/6/2006 -7/6/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 129.79 PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES 139234 113862 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 7/6. . . 8:07:42 Page - 29 Business Unit PLAYGROUND & THEATER 355.29 286291 71612006 116411 TRINITY MEDICAL SOLUTIONS INC. 2,103.96 UNIFORMS 00002206 139593 6620 5620.6201 LAUNDRY EDINBOROUGH PARK 2,103.96 286292 7/6/2006 100682 TRUGREEN- CHEMLAWN _ 47.93 WEED CONTROL 139295 372953 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 47.93 286293 716/2006 101045 TURF SUPPLY COMPANY 443.47 CAL - VANTAGE 00006450 139429 100778 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 443.47 286294 716/2006 102489 TWIN CITY CONCRETE PRODUCTS CO 522.42 MORTAR 00001802 139430 292204 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 522.42 286.295 7/6/2006 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE 284.99 DOOR CLOSERS 00002178 139594 178784 5620.6530 REPAIR PARTS EDINBOROUGH PARK 245.86 DOOR PARTS /REPAIR 00001842 139595 178318 1646.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 530.85 286296 7/6/2006 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 931.88 SEED 00006449 139431 14621 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 153.36 FERTILIZER 00001843 139596 14627 1643.6547 SEED GENERAL TURF CARE 1,085.24 286297 71612006 100363 U.S. BANK 27.37 POSTAGE 139597 062806 1550.6235 POSTAGE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 28.46 CONNECTOR 139597 062806 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 46.25 NAME BADGES 139597' 062806 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 157.00 STAMPS 139597 062806 1550.6235 POSTAGE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 165.00 MFSCB CERTIFICATION 139597 062806 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 255.49 MATTRESS PADS 139597 062806 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 269.50 GAS GRILL PARTS 139597 062806 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 378.07 LOCKER 139597 062806 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 484.00 SUPPLIES FOR R -91 139597 062806 1480.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SPECIAL OPERATIONS 568.22 SUPPLIES FOR R -91 139597 062806 1480.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SPECIAL OPERATIONS 2,379.36 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/6/2006 8:07:42 Council Check Register Page - 30 7/6/2006 -7/6/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 286298 7/612006 102026 UNISOURCE 1,917.00 ABOUT TOWN PAPER 00004112 139296 593 - 38710311 2210.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 1,917.00 286299 7/6/2006 101053 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY 131.10 BLACK BOXES, HOUSING 00001882 139432 599314 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIFT STATION MAINT 131.10 286300 7/6/2006 100371 UNITED RENTALS 493.99 SPLINES, LUTES, TROWELS 00001864 139235 57081900 -001 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 493.99 286301 716/2006 100569 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 720.00 PESTICIDE TRAINING 00001837 139297 062806 1640.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 720.00 286302 716/2006 101055 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 230.00 MMCAA CONFERENCE FEE 139470 062706 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION 230.00 286303 7/6/2006 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 453.11 METER COUPLINGS 00001888 139298 187319 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 453.11 286304 71612006 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 347.39 BAGS 139236 640806 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 525.58 CAN LINERS 00001768 139299 640507 1645.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LITTER REMOVAL 313.61 BAGS 00007512 139433 640807 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 4.85- CREDIT 00006347 139434 640633 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 471.80 ROLL TOWEL, TISSUE 00006347 139435 640508 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 855.00 BAGS, TOWELS, UTENSILS 00007513 139598 640808 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY 14.50 GLOVES 139599 641503 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 2,523.03 286305 7/6/2006 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 445.00 LEASE CARS 00006293 139436 24318 5423.6216 LEASE LINES GOLF CARS 1,498.72 ENGINE 00006458 139437 24380 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 64.75 STEERING HOUSING 00006457 139438 24369 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 2,008.47 286306 7/6 @006 102571 VGM CLUB 1,390.00 CART SEED CADDIES 00006438 139439 010099 5423.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF CARS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY Ot _,,NA Council Check Register 7/6/2006 -7/6/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No — Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1,390.00 286307 716/2006 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 345.06 PADLOCKS 00001823 139300 177124 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 345.06 286308 7/6/2006 100023 VOGEL, ROBERT C. 1,000.00 HERITAGE PRES STUDY 139471 26026 07091.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 1,000.00 286309 7/6/2006 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 793.89 LIGHTING 00001870 139301 15048046 -00 1646.6578 LAMPS & FIXTURES 793.89 286310 716/2006 101080 WALSH, WILLIAM 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 139177 070106 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.00 . 286311 716/2006 106085 WANDREI, LINDA 68.00 PROGRAM REFUND 139302 062706 1600.4390.03 FAB 4 & 5 68.00 286312 71612006 103266 WELSH COMPANIES LLC 554.93 JULY MAINTENANCE 139183 070106 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 554.93 286313 7/6/2006 101076 WEST PHOTO 27.82 BACKDROP RENTAL 00004117 139600 60437 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 27.82 286314 7/6/2006 114588 WILSON, ROBERT C. . 70.00 SUBSCRIPTION COST 139472 062806 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 70.00 286315 7/6/2006 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 7/6,_ 8:07:42 - Page - 31 Business Unit PATHS & HARD SURFACE SIDEWALK INTERLACHEN /BLAKE BUILDING MAINTENANCE RESERVE PROGRAM PARK ADMIN. GENERAL YORK OCCUPANCY COMMUNICATIONS ASSESSING 1,118.80 139732 144383 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 955.50 139733 144392 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1 402 40 139734 144503 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,476.70 286316 7/6/2006 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 1,522.34 139366 160854 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/6/2006 8:07:42 Council Check Register Page - 32 Check # Date 286317 7/6/2006 286318 7/6/2006 286319 7/612006 286320 7/6/2006 286321 7/6/2006 286322 716/2006 286323 716/2006 101087 WROBLESKI, HENRY 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 139181 070106 1419.6102 100.00 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 1,895.05 2006 MS4 /SWPPP 139473 1 - 6/14/06 5932.6103 8,949.50 W 70TH ST DESIGN 139474 3-6/22/06 01336.1705.20 10,844.55 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL STORM SEWER CONSULTING DESIGN BA336 W70TH - FRANCE TO YORK 7/6/2006 --7/6/2006 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 727.21 139735 161437 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,149.78 139736 161515 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,780.95 139737 161514 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 512.15 139738 161513 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 8.25- 139739 29399 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 7.00- 139740 ' 29400 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 12.00- 139741 29398 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 226.29- 139742 29584 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6,438.89 112954 WISCONSIN TURF EQUIPMENT CORP. 219.27 AERATOR TINES 00006444 139440 526578- 000 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 219.27 118395 WITMER ASSOCIATES INC. 146.99 HANGERS 00003608 139617 E238985 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 146.99 101082 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY 1,491.00 BALL PICKER PARTS 00006161 139441 140876 5424.6530 REPAIR PARTS RANGE 241.29 MINI GOLF BALLS 00002018 139601 150762 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 1,732.29 118368 WOLFF, SARA 272.79 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 139303 062306 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 272.79 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 100.00 139367 180490 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 682.50 139743 180716 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 630.00 139744 180717 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 698.50 139745 180645 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 101087 WROBLESKI, HENRY 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 139181 070106 1419.6102 100.00 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 1,895.05 2006 MS4 /SWPPP 139473 1 - 6/14/06 5932.6103 8,949.50 W 70TH ST DESIGN 139474 3-6/22/06 01336.1705.20 10,844.55 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL STORM SEWER CONSULTING DESIGN BA336 W70TH - FRANCE TO YORK R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY TWA 71, 3 8:07:42 Council Check Register Page - 33 7/6/2006 -7/612006 _ Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description - Business Unit 286325 716/2006 101726 XCEL ENERGY 1,273.58 51. 5107681-0 139237 73085706 5111.6185 LIGHT & POWER ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 944.07 51- 6223269 -1 139238 73112748 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 259.58 51- 4197645 -8 139239 73063463 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 57.21 51- 4420190 -3 139240 73233858 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 95.95 51- 4621797 -2 139241 73394683 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 30.45 51- 6892224 -5 139242 73452718 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 2,244.42 51- 5547446 -1 139243 73259468 1628.6185 LIGHT & POWER SENIOR CITIZENS 2,775.64 51- 5005454 -3 139244 73249815 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 37.27 51- 6541084 -2 139245 73444346 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 57.95 51- 6692497 -0 139304 73602624 1460.6185 LIGHT & POWER CIVILIAN DEFENSE 8,636.66 51- 6955679 -8 139305 73614491 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENERAL 2,357.70 51- 4159265 -8 139442 73400097 7411.6185 LIGHT & POWER PSTF OCCUPANCY 2,984.26 51- 4827232 -6 139530 73734290 5311.6185 LIGHT & POWER POOL OPERATION 576.71 51- 6137136 -8 139531 73754917 5430.6185 LIGHT & POWER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 12,596.84 51- 6644819 -9 139532 73124935 5620.6185 LIGHT & POWER EDINBOROUGH PARK 29,235.98 51- 4621797 -2 139533 73723071 1321.6185 LIGHT &POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 102.97 51- 4197645 -8 139534 73386193 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 294.03 51- 5938955 -6 139602 73916237 4086.6185 LIGHT & POWER AQUATIC WEEDS 181.50 51- 4156445-0 139603 73878622 5932.6185 LIGHT & POWER GENERAL STORM SEWER 684.57 51- 6046826-0 139604 73914918 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 84.32 51- 5634814 -2 139605 73910873 5933.6185 LIGHT & POWER PONDS & LAKES 133.54 51- 6229265 -9 139606 73919709 1481.6185 .LIGHT & POWER YORK FIRE STATION 852.90 51- 6229265 -9 139606 73919709 1470.6185 LIGHT & POWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 66,498.10 600,702.56 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 600,702.56 Total Payments 600,702.56 R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/6/2006 8:09:35 Council Check Summary Page - 1 - 7/6/2006 - 7/6/2006 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 176,896.21 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 9,926.30 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 15,778.23 04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND 45,431.70 05100 ART CENTER FUND 6,353.27 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 1,062.53 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 12,226.71 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 41,381.06 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 10,809.62 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 17,880.66 05800 LIQUOR FUND 168,341.79 05900 UTILITY FUND 83,058.19 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 9,160.68 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 2,395.61 Report Totals 600,702.56 We confirm to the best of our ianowtec�a and belief, thet these claims comply in all materiel respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing nolIkke and Procedures date n lO Finance Are r City R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY 0 _ -iNA 7/l----j6 9:44:56 Council Check Register Page - 1 7/13/2006 - 7/13/2006. Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 286326 7/13/2006 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 14.28 139857 606587 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 49.40 139858 476020 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 128.52 139859 473584 5862.5515 COST OFGOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 137.64 139860 476133 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 53.40 140067 606618 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 62.12 140068 606617 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 35.56 140069 606589 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 480.92 286327 7113/2006 100615 ACME WINDOW CLEANING INC 1,054.35 RAMP CLEANING 139905 060133 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 1,054.35 286328 7113/2006 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 34.96 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 139747 72663 5111.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 473.75 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 139989 72881 1550.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 508.71 286329 711312006 119862 ALLIANCE MEDICAL 2,875.00 BUFFER ZONE GRANT 00003137 139906 587788 1400.4214 STATE GRANT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,875.00 286330 7/1312006 100058 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #894 33,958.00 RECYCLING 139990 508280 5952.6183 RECYCLING CHARGES RECYCLING 33,958.00 286331 7/13/2006 105086 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATI 127.50 WATER METER MANUALS 00001897 139748 1000317306 5916.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER READING 127.50 286332 711312006 102171 ANDERSON - JOHNSON ASSOCIATES 8,500.00 FEASIBILITY STUDY 139749 060700606 47041.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COURTNEY CONCESSION BUILDING 8,500.00 286333 7/13/2006 119976 AP LAWN 7,226.00 MULCHING & STREETSCAPES 00002027 139991 EDINA -0506 5630.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL LAKES 7,226.00 286334 7/1312006 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. 345.30 CHLORINE 00002198 139992 28941 5620.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH PARK 150.87 ACID 00002203 139993 28968 5620.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH PARK R55CKREG LOG20000 41.45 MERCHANDISE CITY OF EDINA 754082 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES Council Check Register 7/13/2006 - 7/13/2006 7/13/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 496.17 FOOD 00006324 139753 6450 5430.5510 286335 7113/2006 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 77.32 152.27 COFFEE 00006331 139750 402299 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 100642 BANNERS TO GO 258.92 COFFEE 139994 402348 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 63.90 411.19 00001933 139754 22133 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 286336 7/1312006 101977 ARCH WIRELESS SIGNAGE 00001847 139996 22147 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 10.97 PAGER 139751 P6096083G 1550.6188 TELEPHONE 10.97 286342 711312006 286337 7/1312006 119645 ARCSTONE INFORMATION SERVICES 178.75 EBROCHURE 00006321 139907 10992 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 178.75 58.00 286338 7/13/2006 119963 ARMSTRONG, MEGAN 286343 7113/2006 7/12/2006 9:44:56 Page - 2 Business Unit RICHARDS GOLF COURSE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GOLF ADMINISTRATION 25 00 JULY 4TH COSTUME CHARACTER 139995 070406 1624.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 25.00 286339 7/13/2006 102134 ASHWORTH INC. 41.45 MERCHANDISE 00006485 139752 754082 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 41.45 286340 7/13/2006 101954 AUGIE'S INC. 77.32 FOOD 00006324 139753 6450 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 77.32 286341 7/13/2006 100642 BANNERS TO GO 63.90 PARK SIGNS 00001933 139754 22133 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 70.29 SIGNAGE 00001847 139996 22147 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 134.19 286342 711312006 119968 BARGER, MARK 58.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 139997 070606. 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 58.00 286343 7113/2006 119964 BATISTE, KANDIS 25.00 JULY 4TH COSTUME CHARACTER 139998 070406 1624.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 25.00 286344 711312006 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 31.94 BATTERIES TECH KIT 139908 18- 151020 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GEr'- -'I. 7/1�- 9:44:56 Page - 3 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 280.54 139861 37566500 CITY OF. .A COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR R55CKREG LOG20000 157.10 139862 41721400 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 894.30 Council Check Register 139863 37566700 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 7/13/2006 7/13/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 140071 31.94 5862.5513 COST bF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 286345 7/13/2006 102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC. 286349 7/13/2006 13.02 TAX ON INVOICE C1054 00001528 139909 C1054TAX 1553.6530 . REPAIR PARTS 13.02 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 139967 070706 286346 7/13/2006 ART CENTER REVENUES 100607 BAUER, MICHAEL 19.98 2006 UNIFORM PURCHASE 139910 070506 1301.6201 LAUNDRY 19.98 148.20 286347 7/1312006 070706 116151 BCA - BTS ARTWORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 148.20 90.00 INTOX CLASS 139911 6066826,6066827 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 286351 7/1312006 90.00 286348 7/1312006 311.58 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 139755 WO- 410628 -1 7/1�- 9:44:56 Page - 3 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 280.54 139861 37566500 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 157.10 139862 41721400 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 894.30 139863 37566700 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 137.63 140070 41729300 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,388.60 140071 37585000 5862.5513 COST bF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,858.17 286349 7/13/2006 100661 BENN, BRADLEY 230.41 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 139967 070706 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 230.41 286350 7/1312006 115067 BENSON, RON PAUL 148.20 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 139968 070706 5101.4413 ARTWORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 148.20 286351 7/1312006 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 311.58 FILE FOLDERS 139755 WO- 410628 -1 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 66.90 OFFICE SUPPLIES 139756 WO- 410328 -1 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 182.18 OFFICE SUPPLIES 139757 W0410642-1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 185.61 OFFICE SUPPLIES 139912 WO- 410614 -1 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 93.11 HEADSET 139999 WO- 411157 -1 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 72.76 OFFICE SUPPLIES 140000 WO- 411056 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 114.39 HEADSET' 140001 WO. 411248 -1 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 18.29 OFFICE SUPPLIES 140002 W0-411266 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 2.65 OFFICE SUPPLIES 140003 WO- 410481 -2 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 131.42 OFFICE SUPPLIES 140004 W0 -410481 -1 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 103.02 ELECTRIC STAPLER 140005 OE- 61401 -1 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FINANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/13/2006 — 7/13/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1,281.91 286352 711312006 119679 BIXBY PORTABLE TOILET SERVICE 110.98 SERVICE CHARGE 139913 4522 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 221.95 SERVICE CHARGE 139914 4521 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 588.25 SERVICE CHARGE 00001856 140006 4523 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 921.18 286353 7/1312006 100654 SJORK STONE INC. 12,186.00 REPAIR STONE WALL 00005915 139758 0028 1344.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 180.00 REPAIR STONE WALL 00005915 139759 0029 1344.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 12,366.00 286354 7113/2006 103866 BLALOCK, KAREN 89.70 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 139969 070706 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 89.70 286355 711312006 102545 BLUE CROSS /BLUE SHIELD 45.59 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 140007 HARLAN 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES APPLEOUIST 45.59 286356 711312006 101516 BRAEMAR PRINTING 184.84 GIFT CERTIFICATES 00006319 139760 00029948 5410.6575 PRINTING 184.84 286357 7113/2006 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 7/12/2006 9:44:56 Page - 4 Business Unit RICHARDS GOLF COURSE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS BUILDING MAINTENANCE RETAINING WALL MAINTENANCE RETAINING WALL MAINTENANCE ART CENTER REVENUES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GOLF ADMINISTRATION 2 195 15 CONCRETE TESTING 139915 263752 05427.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION PLANT #3 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYST 2,195.15 286358 711312006 103888 BRENT ANDERSON ASSOCIATES, INC 32,153.00 ROOF REPLACEMENT 00004103 139761 606040.01 5500.1720 BUILDINGS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET 32,153.00 286359 711312006 103995 BRYAN, LINDA NELSON 58.50 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 139970 070706 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 58.50 286360 711312006 102083 CALHOUN ISLES COMMUNITY BAND 100.00 PERFORMANCE 7/16/06 140008 070106 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 100.00 CITY OF -AA 7/1�._ _ , 9:44:56 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register. Page - 5 7/13/2006 7/13/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description J Business Unit 286361 7113/2006 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 3,511.61 MERCHANDISE 139762 908640286 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 65.00 MERCHANDISE 139763 909032602 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 72.00 MERCHANDISE 139764 908995410 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 74.17 MERCHANDISE 139765 908957361 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 246.96 MERCHANDISE 139766 908946199 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 105.58 MERCHANDISE 139767 908806705 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 102.96 MERCHANDISE 139768 908840743 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 198.96 MERCHANDISE 139769 908625496 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 246.96 MERCHANDISE 139770 908891124 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 407.25 MERCHANDISE 139771 908995409 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 779.15 MERCHANDISE 139772 908703779 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 753.84 MERCHANDISE 139773 908681787 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,193.76 MERCHANDISE 139774 909011707 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 509.39- 2005 YEAR END REBATE 139775 908200587 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 7,248.81 286362 7/13/2006 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 2,815.85 139864 101016 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 103.00 139916 110491 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE. 932.30 140072 101022 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 33.90 140073 101023 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 2,688.25 140074 101024 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 76.05 140075 101025 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 6,649.35 286363 7/13/2006 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 402.45 139865 315741 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 402.45 286364 7/13/2006 119961 CHRISTENSON, MARY 80.67 REFUND CREDIT ON ACCT 140009 070606 5900.1211.1 ACCTS RECEIVABLE MANUAL UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 80.67 286365 7/13/2006 105693 CITYSPRINT 9.37 COURIER 139776 1954 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING 19.51 COURIER 139776 1954 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 147.92 COURIER 139776 1954 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 176.80 286366 7/13/2006 101345 COLOURS 276.90 CONCEPT NAME - ART CENTER 140010 9580 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS CITY OF EDINA 7/12/2006 9:44:56 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 6 7/13/2006 --7/13/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 224.00 AD DESIGN 140011 9578 -01 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 480.00 PROMENADE POSTCARD DESIGN 140012 9579 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 6,109.01 EDINA LIQUOR NEWSLETTER 140013 9561 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 685.00 POSTCARD DESIGN 140014 9561 -01 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 7,774.91 286367 7/13/2006 100693 COMMERCIAL FURNITURE 159.75 FILE CABINET 00001918 139917 15009 -0 1552.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 159.75 286368 7/13/2006 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 239.18 FILTER MASK, FILTERS 00001921 139777 02847086 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 38.68 GLOVES 00001913 139778 02846770 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 277.86 286369 7/13/2006 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 69.00 KILN UPGRADE 00009183 139779 INV000021488 5112.6530 REPAIR PARTS ART CENTER POTTERY 457.85 CLAY 00009183 139779 INV000021488 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 526.85 286370 7113/2006 119839 CORNEJO CONSULTING 6,350.00 PLANNING CONSULTANT 139918 070106 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING 6,350.00 286371 7/1312006 100513 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES IN 2.742.38 CUSTODIAL SERVICES 139780 108901 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 2,742.38 286372 7/13/2006 119969 CTN STUDIOS 1,410.00 TECHNICIAN TRUCK FOR PARADE 140015 070506 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 1,410.00 286373 7/13/2006 102121 DATREK PROFESSIONAL BAGS INC 73.61 GOLF BAG 00006150 139781 925125 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 88.39 GOLF BAG 00006150 139782 925126 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 562.22 GOLF BAGS 00006150 139783 922442 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 724.22 286374 7113/2006 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING 515.20 139866 367969 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 750.36 139867 368991 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 30.16 140076 368989 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 GOLF BALLS 00006316 139788 49454 CITY Ot AA PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 384.00 Council Check Register 286382 7/13/2006 119966 DYRESON, BERNARD 7/13/2006 - 7/13/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description -- 1,295.72 286383 711312006 100739 EAGLE WINE 286375 7113/2006 118490 DEEP ROCK WATER COMPANY 386.20 139868 434882 5822.5513 402.19 ACCT 6091800 139784 062706 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 402.19 1,336.47 139870 434876 5862.5513 286376 711312006 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 51.01 BAKERY 139785 218934 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 59.19 BAKERY 139786 218981 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 119.24 BAKERY 139787 218982 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 49.38 BAKERY 139919 218983 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 278.82 286377 711312006 101947 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 1,260.00 MOTS - APR,MAY,JUNE 139920 P07MN027060M61- 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING 660.00 CJDN - APR,MAY,JUNE 139921 P07MN02706006L 1400.6204 TELETYPE SERVICE 1,920.00 286378 7113/2006 111120 DESIGN N PRINT 79.81 INSPECTION REPORTS 140016 32342 1490.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 79.81 286379 7/13/2006 118556 DIAMOND, GARY 183.30 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 139971 070706 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 183.30 286380 711312006 108648 DOAN, SIIRI 113.10 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 139972 070706 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 113.10 286381 7/13/2006 114116 DUSHANE, DAVE 7/1L_- d 9.44.56 Page - 7 _ Business Unit POOL OPERATION GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PUBLIC HEALTH ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES 384.00 GOLF BALLS 00006316 139788 49454 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 384.00 286382 7/13/2006 119966 DYRESON, BERNARD 36.00 PARKING PERMIT REFUND 140017 070506 4090.4751 PARKING PERMITS STREET REVOLVING 36.00 286383 711312006 100739 EAGLE WINE 386.20 139868 434882 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,535.24 139869 434886 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,336.47 139870 434876 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OFfDINA Council Check Register 7/13/2006 — 7/13/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3,257.91 286384 711312006 100741 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 7/12/2006 9:44:56 Page - 8 — 133.95 139790 219583 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 391.00 139791 18883 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 22,596.90 139871 320760 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER. YORK SELLING 304.00 139872 674002 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 15.50 140077 674245 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 9,512.93 140078 320839 5842.5514 'COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 37.00 140079 320837 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 32,991.28 286385 7/1312006 103235 EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY BAND 100.00 PERFORMANCE 7/17106 140018 070106 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 100.00 286386 7113/2006 103235 EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY BAND 150.00 PERFORMANCE 7/19106 140019 070206 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER . ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 286387 7/13/2006 105875 EDINA EATERY INC./ PICKERMAN' 309.72 SONIA'S SNACKS 139792 1159 5111.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 309.72 286388 7/13/2006 116448 EGAN OIL COMPANY 22,547.95 GAS 00005895 139789 125027 .1553.6581 GASOLINE EOUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 22,547.95 286389 7/13/2006 105294 EKLUND MULCH SALES 734.85 PO 1305 & 1619 OOOMULCH140020 406 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 734.85 286390 7/13/2006 105339 ENRGI 5,875.00 WEBSITE REDESIGN 139793 4522 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 5,875.00 286391 7113/2006 100752 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC. 2,607.12 CASTINGS, COVERS 00005926 139922 JJ3223 5932.6536 CASTINGS GENERAL STORM SEWER 2,607.12 286392 711312006 104832 EVENT SOUND & LIGHTING 2,117.22 SOUND SYSTEM SERVICES 00007116 139923 743 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY Ot —NA 7/1 ._ _..0 9:44:56 Council Check Register Page - 9 7/13/2006 7/13/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No - -- -- Subledger Account Description -- - -- - - - -- - Business Unit 2,117.22 286393 7/13/2006 100018 EXPERT T BILLING 5,303.70 JUNE TRANSPORTS 140059 070606 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5,303.70 286394 7/1312006 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 96.00 140080 439959 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 96.00 286395 7113/2006 100297 FAST FOTO & DIGITAL 17.25 PRINT FOLDERS 139794 T2- 227290 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 17.25 286396 7/13/2006 119971 FELSEN, GREGG 68.25 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 139973 070706 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 68.25 286397 7113/2006 112870 FLEISCHMANN, LESLIE 82.55 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 139974 070706 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 82.55 286398 7/1312006 101475 FOOTJOY 102.90 SHOES 00006178 139795 4015753 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 102.90 286399 7113/2006 119972 GERSTNER, MARY KAY 113.75 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 139975 070706 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 113.75 286400 7113/2006 101867 GETSINGER, DONNA 85.80 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 139976 070706 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 85.80 286401 7113/2006 104119 GILBERTSON, BRIAN 150.00 PERFORMANCE 7/18/06 140021 070106 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 286402 7/1312006 119936 GLOBAL OAK 1,200.00 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 139796 326 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 1,200.00 11,868.34 CITY OF EDINA 7/12/2006 9:44:56 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 10 7/13/2006 7/13/2006 Check # Data Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No. Subledger Account Description Business Unit 286403 711312006 118265 GLOVE IT 76.26 GOLF GLOVES 00006082 139797 8914 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 76.26 286404 7/13/2006 114697 GOPHER STRIPING CO. 350.00 RESTRIPE PARKING LOT 00001855 140022 06033 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 450.00 RESTRIPE PARKING LOT 00001852 140023 06032 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 350.00 STRIPE BUS PARKING AREAS 140024 06031 5311.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL OPERATION 1,150.00 286405 7/13/2006 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 335.25 139873 83024 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 927.08 140081 83088 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 317.25 140082 83025 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,579.58 286406 7113/2006 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE 88.58 INK CARTRIDGES 139798 070506 5840.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 30.00 CARDING INCENTIVE 140060 071006 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 30.00 CARDING INCENTIVE 140060 071006 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 30.00 CARDING INCENTIVE 140060 071006 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 30.42 PACKAGING TAPE 140060 071006 5840.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 209.00 286407 7/13/2006 102125 GREG LESSMAN SALES 351.43 MERCHANDISE 00006111 139924 33039 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 351.43 286408 7/13/2006 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 1,132.03 139874 434883 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 579.30 139875 434651 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,625.58 139876 434885 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 266.19 139877 434884 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 264.45- 139878 696522 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 20.94- 139879 696867 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 51.28- 139880 696911 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,962.73 140083 433662 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,426.76 140084 434881 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 33.19 140085 434880 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 17923 140086 434879 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 11,868.34 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY 01 _ -ANA 711—_._.,6 9:44:56 Council Check Register Page - 11 7/13/2006 — 7/13/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 286409 7/13/2006 119967 GROBE, RAY 830.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 140025 070606 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 830.00 286410 7/1312006 102869 GUEST, LISA 100.10 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 139977 070706 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 100.10 286411 7113/2006 101964 GUSTAVE A. LARSON CO. - 18.73 CONTRACTOR 00001926 139925 BLM0097833 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 18.73 286412 711312006 114566 HARTKE, BRENDA 79.95 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 139978 070706 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 79.95 286413 7/13/2006 100797 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT 3,036.86 CHEMICALS 00005913 139926 820116 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 3,036.86 - 286414 7/13/2006 101576 HEGGIES PIZZA 68.50 PIZZA 139927 149891 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 68.50 286415 7/13/2006 101921 HEGMAN, STEVE 150.00 PROGRAM ON 7/18/06 140026 070106 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 286416 7/1312006 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 205.44 MEAT PATTIES 00006335 139799 019327 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 205.44 286417 7/13/2006 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURI 476.06 FIELD MARKING PAINT 00005874 139800 72197 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE " 476.06 286418 711312006 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 331.00 140087 392793 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 331.00 286419 7/13/2006 100810 HRAICITY OF EDINA 10,000.00 TO FUND HRA 140117 071006 1000.1303 DUE FROM HRA GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/13/2006 -- 7/1312006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1120.6107 1554.6406 1554.6406 1643.6530 1643.6530 5410.6406 5422.6406 5300.2039 5301.4541 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 7/1212006 9:44:56 Page - 12 - Business Unit ADMINISTRATION CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL TURF CARE GOLF ADMINISTRATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS SALES 8 USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET GENERAL ADMISSIONS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 5820.6103 10,000.00 5840.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5860.6103 286420 7113/2006 5310.6103 101426 HUGHES, GORDON 312.84 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 139801 070506 312.84 286421 7/13/2006 100698 IMAGE TECH SERVICES 243.34 TONER 00004121 139802 81491 62.88 PAPER 00004121 139929 81358 306.22 286422 7/13/2006 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 46.89 HOSE, ADAPTORS, CLAMPS 00001835 139803 441381 65.35 HOSE, BUSHINGS, CUTTER 00001877 139804 441112 112.24 286423 7113/2006 112558 ISAAMAN, TREVOR 100.00 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 140027 070606 328.59 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 140027 070606 428.59 286424 7113/2006 119974 ISD #112 - CHASKA SHCOOLS 3.41 PARTIAL REFUND 140028 070706 52.59 PARTIAL REFUND 140028 070706 56.00 286425 7113/2006 101761 IVERSON, KATHRYN 3,981.16 CHEMICAL HEALTH PROGRAM 139930 070306 3,981.16 CHEMICAL HEALTH PROGRAM 139930 070306 3,981.16 CHEMICAL HEALTH PROGRAM 139930 070306 11,943.48 286426 7/13/2006 102157 JEFF ELLIS & ASSOCIATES INC. 550.00 SUMMER AUDIT #2 139931 20028780 550.00 286427 7113/2006 117354 JMS COMPANIES 496.46 HYDRANT USAGE REFUND 140061 071006 496.46 286428 7113/2006 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 539.06 139881 1100228 1120.6107 1554.6406 1554.6406 1643.6530 1643.6530 5410.6406 5422.6406 5300.2039 5301.4541 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 7/1212006 9:44:56 Page - 12 - Business Unit ADMINISTRATION CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL TURF CARE GOLF ADMINISTRATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS SALES 8 USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET GENERAL ADMISSIONS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 5820.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5840.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5860.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5310.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5901.4626 5842.5512 SALE OF WATER 50TH STREET GENERAL LIQUOR YORK GENERAL VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL POOL ADMINISTRATION UTILITY REVENUES COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 7/1�- 9:44:56 1,273.15 Council Check Register 070606 62.50 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE 7/13/2006 98.08 070606 5301.4541 3,041.92 Inv No Account No 1,275.54 _Business Unit 140088 12,320.03 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 5.15 140089 1102132 5.15 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,070.51 1102133 5862.5512 1,061.77 VERNON SELLING 140091 589.70 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 222.96 140092 1102121 94.36 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 21,659.88 1102122 286429 7/13/2006 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 103654 JOHNSON, DENISE 140094 67.60 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 67.60 140095 286430 7/13/2006 5842.5515 119965 KALIEBE, CAROL YORK SELLING 8.24 PARTIAL REFUND 5842.5513 126.76 PARTIAL REFUND 140097 135.00 5842.5513 286431 7113/2006 YORK SELLING 103449 KAMPA, TINA 1102134 70.82 PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 70.82 1102127 286432 7/13/2006 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 106357 KIDS PLACE 140100 1.28 PARTIAL REFUND COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 19.72 PARTIAL REFUND 21.00 286433 7/13/2006 114344 KRAEMER, KARIN 186.55 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 186.55 286434 7113/2006 119975 KRON, MAGGIE 3.84 REFUND 59.16 REFUND 63.00 139979 070706 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 140029 070506 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 140029 070506 5301.4532 SEASON TICKETS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 140030 CITY OF -_..qA 1624.6406 7/1�- 9:44:56 PLAYGROUND & THEATER Council Check Register 070606 Page - 13 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE 7/13/2006 7/13/2006 070606 5301.4541 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description _Business Unit 140088 1102131 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 140089 1102132 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 140090 1102133 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 140091 1102119 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 140092 1102121 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 140093 1102122 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 140094 1102123 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 140095 1098814 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 140096 1102125 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 140097 1102120 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 140098 1102134 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 140099 1102127 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 140100 1102128 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 139979 070706 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 140029 070506 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 140029 070506 5301.4532 SEASON TICKETS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 140030 070606 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 140031 070606 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 140031 070606 5301.4541 GENERAL ADMISSIONS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 139980 070706 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 140032 070706 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 140032 070706 5301.4541 GENERAL ADMISSIONS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/13/2006 — 7/13/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description . 286435 7/13/2006 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 44.84 LMC DIRECTORY 140033 070106 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 44.84 286436 7/13/2006 100855 LESCO INC. 7/12/2006 9:44:56 Page - 14 Business Unit ADMINISTRATION 120.53 CHEMICALS, SPRAYERS 00001839 139805 14301228 1643.6546 WEED SPRAY GENERAL TURF CARE 120.53 286437 7113/2006 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1,060.03 139882 203450 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,060.03 286438 7/13/2006 101741 M. SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS INC. 30.00 WINE SPECTATOR 139806 668894 5822.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 50TH ST SELLING 30.00 286439 7/13/2006 105677 MAGC 70.00 MEMBERSHIP & WORKSHOP 140034 070706 2210.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COMMUNICATIONS 70.00 286440 7/13/2006 100868 MARK VII SALES 9,559.93 140101 968105 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 9,559.93 286441 7/13/2006 102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC 170.00 139932 30762 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 170.00 286442 7/13/2006 102153 MCAA 310.00 TRAINING 140035 070506 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 310.00 286443 7/13/2006 100875 MCCAREN DESIGNS INC. 696.51 PLANTS 00002190 140036 36547 5620.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH PARK 696.51 286444 7/1312006 101457 MEICHSNER, EARL 98.79 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 140062 070706 1652.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE WEED MOWING 98.79 286445 7/13/2006 101483 MENARDS 60.80 CABLE/CLAMPS, PLIERS 00006312 139807 38714 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE CITY OF -,NA 7/1�,_ -..d - 9:44:56 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 15 7/13/2006 - 7/13/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 60.80 286446 7/13/2006 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 46.75 BASKETBALLS 139808 92542 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 46.75 286447 7/13/2006 100410 METROCALL. 11.23 PAGERS 139809 P0317425G 5860.6406 _GENERAL-SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 11.23 PAGERS 139809 P0317425G 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 22.46 PAGERS 139809 P0317425G 1490.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC HEALTH 22.46 PAGERS 139809 P0317425G 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 25.72 PAGERS 139809 P0317425G 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 93.10 286448 7/13/2006 102508 METZGER, MAURE ANN 116.35 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 139981 070706 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 116.35 286449 7113/2006 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 1,440.00 GATE VALVE REPAIR 00001569 139810 32855 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1,530.00 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 00001570 139811 32854 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1,440.00 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 00001571 139933 32851 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 4,410.00 286450 7113/2006 101320 MINNEAPOLIS AREA ASSOC OF REAL 150.00 MLS ACCESS FEES 140037 1357297,1357298 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 150.00 286451 7/13/2006 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 27,869.64 WATER PURCHASE 140038 070506 5913.6601 WATER PURCHASED DISTRIBUTION 27,869.64 286452 7/1312006 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 17.25 CARBON DIOXIDE 00006428 139934 R106060134 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 17.25 286453 7/13/2006 102770 MINNESOTA CASTERS INC. 35.91 WHEELS 00001534 139935 INV27332 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 35.91 286454 7/13/2006 102014 MINNESOTA CLAY USA 25.50 POTTERY PLASTER 00009186 139812 43412 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/12/2006 9:44:56 Council Check Register Page - 16 7/13/2006 - 7/13/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description - Business Unit 25.50 286455 7/1312006 101589 MINNESOTA GFOA 200.00 REGISTRATION - JOHN WALLIN 139936 070606 1160.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FINANCE 200.00 REGISTRATION - ERIC ROGGEMAN 139936 070606 1160.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FINANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS ART WORK SOLD I ART CENTER REVENUES GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES GENERAL SUPPLIES SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT G' -4Y SHOP . 400.00 286456 7113/2006 103240 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL 280.00 DEFENSIVE DRIVING CLASS 140039 018793 1628.6103 280.00 286457 7/1312006 117418 MINNESOTA SNO FLAKES 93.60 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 139982 070706 5101.4413 93.60 286458 7/13/2006 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 106.50 OVERSEEDER 00002032 140040 533199 -00 5630.6406 106.50 286459 7/1312006 103267 NATIONAL GOLF FOUNDATION 234.90 RULES BOOKS 00006322 139937 72775 5410.6122 234.90 286460 7/13/2006 100922 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS 1,451.23 SIGNS 00001701 139938 TI -0161212 1325.6531 1,451.23 286461 7113/2006 104672 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 264.07 140041 737969523 -025 1495.6188 264.07 286462 7113/2006 102260 NORMAN, MIKE 117.00 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 139983 070706 5101.4413 117.00 286463 7/1312006 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPP 325.04 HOCKEY RINK PARTS 00001917 139813 111418 1648.6406 325.04 286464 711312006 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY 33.55 CLEAR ACETATE 00009191 139814 33077700 5120.5510 114.69 TRIANGLES, T- SQUARES 00009176 139815 32963302 _ 5120.5510 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS ART WORK SOLD I ART CENTER REVENUES GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES GENERAL SUPPLIES SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT G' -4Y SHOP . R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY Ot _ .,4A 7/1<._ .d 9:44:56 Council Check Register Page - 17 7/13/2006 - 7/13/2006 Check #, Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 148.24 286465 7/1312006 100930 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO. 294.95 TIRES, SCRAP FEE 00001644 139939 NW- 102268 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 294.95 286466 7/13/2006 116480 NSITE MYSTERY SHOPPING 163.93 SECRET SHOPPING 140042 1386 5862.6406 GENERAL-SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 165.00 SECRET SHOPPING 140042 1386 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 165.00 SECRET SHOPPING 140042 1386 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 493.93 286467 7/1312006 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC. 261.87 FURNACE REPAIR 00006323 139940 95268 5210.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GOLF DOME PROGRAM 261.87 286468 7113/2006 100347 PAUSTIS 8 SONS 1,119.85 140102 81135654N 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,119.85 286469 711312006 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 224.00 139816 93412101 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 1,237.40 139941 36213161 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 200.00 140043 31173638 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES 1,661.40 286470 7113/2006 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 76.59 139883 2345422 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 333.90 140103 2346929 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,875.61 140104 2346927 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,198.75 140105 2346928 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,350.20 140106 2346930 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5,835.05 286471 711312006 119146 PLYMAT, AMY 122.20 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 139984 070706 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 122.20 286472 7/13/2006 100961 POSTMASTER _ 375.00 NEWSLETTER 139942 070706 1628.6235 POSTAGE SENIOR CITIZENS 375.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/12/2006 9:44:56 Council Check Register Page - 18 7/13/2006 7113/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 286473 7/13/2006 106152 POWERPLAN 922.26 FENDERS, SUPPORT, MIRROR 00001950 139943 P08237 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 922.26 286474 711312006 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 866.27 139884 434717 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,472.52 139885 434877 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 72.65 139886 434878 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,054.06 139887 434887 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,465.50 286475 7/13/2006 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 229.25 TISSUE, TOWELS 00002197 140044 3788 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 229.25 286476 7/13/2006 100971 QUALITY WINE 920.15 139888 727900 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 309.75 13988% 727650 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 777.06 139890 727617 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,521.24 139891 727602 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 744.60 139892 727649 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 289.25 139893 727779 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 182.30 139894 727922 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 727.70 139895 727780 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,342.30 139896 727660 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 94.44- 139897 717820 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 240.00- 139898 720090 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6.00- 139899 719240 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,016.06 140107 727539 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 169.10 140108 729181 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 7,659.07 286477 7/13/2006 101965 QWEST 54.82 952 929 -0297 139817 0297 -6/06 4090.6188 TELEPHONE STREET REVOLVING 96.48 952 927 -8861 139818 8861 -0 /06 . 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 86.74 952 929 -9549 139819 9549 -6/06 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 55.07 140063 062806 5911.6188 TELEPHONE PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER - 57.69 140063 062806 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 86.12 140063 062806 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 99.59 140063 062806 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 100.93 140063 062866 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY v ' 165.83 140063 062806 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING.& HOCKE' R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OP _ _.4A Council Check Register 7/13/2006 - 7/13/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 167.47 140063 062806 5610.6188 TELEPHONE 192.45 140063 062806 1470.6188 TELEPHONE 231.76 140063 062806 1646.6188 TELEPHONE 253.85 140063 062806 5511.6188 TELEPHONE 263.73 140063 062806 5932.6188 TELEPHONE 2,422.18 140063 062806 1550.6188 TELEPHONE 4,334.71 3,977.78 286478 7113/2006 119970 RAHN, HELEN 286482 7113/2006 7/1- . 9:44:56 Page - 19 Business Unit ED ADMINISTRATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GENERAL STORM SEWER CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 20.00 PROGRAM REFUND 140045 070606 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 20.00 286479 7/13/2006 100287 RAMSEY COUNTY 200.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 139944 070606 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 5101.4413 5952.6406 1551.6406 2210.6105 4401.6710 1600.4722.03 5421.5510 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES RECYCLING CITY HALL GENERAL DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM.CTR ARNESON ACRES RENTAL COST OF GOODS SOLD PARK ADMIN. GENERAL GRILL 200.00 286480 7/13/2006 119667 RAZIDLO, TERESA 84.50 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 139985 070706 84.50 286481 7/13/2006 102794 REHRIG PACIFIC COMPANY 3,977.78 RECYCLING BINS 00004109 139945 KE61923 3,977.78 286482 7113/2006 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 73.92 SOFTENER SALT 140046 00179369 73.92 286483 7/13/2006 102614 ROTARY CLUB OF EDINA 263.00 DUES 139820 611 263.00 286484 7113/2006 118001 ROZEBOOM MILLER ARCHITECTS INC 6,247.80 ARCHITECT /ENGINEERING SERVICES 140047 15 6,247.80 286485 7113/2006 119962 SAHAR, MARY 150.00 RENTAL REFUND 140048 070506 150.00 286486 7113/2006 101634 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPANY 52.95 BAKERY 1139946 158213 5101.4413 5952.6406 1551.6406 2210.6105 4401.6710 1600.4722.03 5421.5510 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES RECYCLING CITY HALL GENERAL DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM.CTR ARNESON ACRES RENTAL COST OF GOODS SOLD PARK ADMIN. GENERAL GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/13/2006 — 7/13/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART WORK SOLD 7/12/2006 9:44:56 Page - 20 Business Unit GRILL PLAYGROUND & THEATER EDINBOROUGH PARK CITY HALL GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER INSPECTIONS COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER COMMUNICATIONS 52.95 286487 7113/2006 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 174.31 101- 25373069350 00006317 139947 GATORADE 5421.5510 174.31 286488 7/13/2006 119859 SANDELIN, CARRIE 114.72 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 140116 071006 1624.6107 114.72 286489 7/13/2006 118766 SARA LEE SOCK COMPANY 690.70 SOCKS FOR RESALE 00002136 140049 4332131 5620.5510 690.70 286490 7/13/2006 104689 SERIGRAPHICS SIGN SYSTEMS INC. 159.70 SIGNS 139948 37688 1551.6103 159.96 SIGNS 139949 37909 1551.6103 319.66 286491 7/13/2006 101380 SHAUGHNESY, SANDRA 78.00 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 139987 070706 5101.4413 78.00 286492 7/1312006 111824 SIDEKICK 1,549.58 PLAN INDEXING 139821 2128 1495.6136 1,549.58 286493 7/1312006 106663 SONARTEC INC. 278.95 GOLF CLUBS 00006081 139823 0056529 -IN 5440.5511 278.95 286494 7/13/2006 102935 SOUTH TOWN REFRIGERATION INC 158.93 FREEZER REPAIR 00006340 139950 53887 5421.6180 192.37 WALK IN COOLER REPAIR 00006340 139951 53827 5421.6180 1,592.29 REFRIGERATOR REPAIR 00006340 139952 54146 5421.6180 1,943.59 286495 7/1312006 101023 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMI 2,449.33 3RD QUARTER 139953 200612 2210.6136 2,449.33 286496 7113Y 110977 SOW, ADAMA COST OF GOODS SOLD MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART WORK SOLD 7/12/2006 9:44:56 Page - 20 Business Unit GRILL PLAYGROUND & THEATER EDINBOROUGH PARK CITY HALL GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER INSPECTIONS COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER COMMUNICATIONS CITY OF -_.,JA 7/12_ _ _0 9:44:56 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check.Register Page - 21 7/13/2006 - 7/13/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 126.75 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 139988 070706 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 126.75 286497 7/1312006 116682 SPECIALTY WINES & BEVERAGES 201.00 140109 8919 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 201.00 286498 7/1312006 103283 ST. CROIX RECREATION CO INC - 216.22 END CAPS 00001752 139822 14903 1647.6530 REPAIR PARTS PATHS & HARD SURFACE 216.22 286499 7/13/2006 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC 1,278.00 TIRES, RIMS 00001461 139954 SM09011 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,278.00 286500 7/13/2006 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 2.712.80 WANT ADS 139955 063006 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 2,712.80 286501 7/13/2006 119978 STATE SUPPLY COMPANY 322.64 HARDWARE 140064 264257 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 197.03 HARDWARE 140065 267706 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 367.43- HARDWARE RETURNED 140066 285890 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 152.24 286502 7113/2006 101015 STREICHERS 318.44 AEROSOL 139957 1362739 1400.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 417.96 AVON ROUND 139958 1362696 1400.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 736.40 286503 7/13/2006 117992 STRINGER BUSINESS SYSTEMS 37.73 COPIER MAINT 139959 1180016 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 37.73 286504 7/13/2006 102639 .STROHMYER,TOM 150.00 PERFORMANCE 7/20/06 140050 070106 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 286505 7/1312006 102140 SUN MOUNTAIN SPORTS INC. 57.00 MERCHANDISE 139824 660199 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 657.20 MERCHANDISE 139825 661249 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 127.50- CREDIT 139826 867275 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/12/2006 9:44:56 Council Check Register Page - 22 7/13/2006 7113/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description _ Business Unit 255.00- CREDIT 139827 866924 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 10.00- CREDIT 139828 866683 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 83.00- CREDIT 139829 867276 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 127.50- CREDIT 00006099 139956 867780 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 111.20 286506 7/13/2006 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 550.00 JULY 4TH AD 139830 871674 2210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER COMMUNICATIONS 550.00 286507 7/13/2006 119864 SYSCO MINNESOTA 539.64 CONCESSION PRODUCT 139831 607011767 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 193.42 CONCESSION PRODUCT 139832 607049050 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 641.90 CONCESSION PRODUCT 139833 607041041 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 38.71 CONCESSION PRODUCT 139834 607050595 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 143.65 CLEANING SUPPLIES 139960 607061503 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 521.23 CONCESSION PRODUCT 139960 607061503 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 2,078.55 286508 711312006 111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC. 35.00 BEERLINE CLEANING 00006325 139835 365390 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL 35.00 286509 7113/2006 113549 TENNIS WEST 12,540.00 TENNIS COURT RESURFACING 00001307 139961 06 -466 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 210.00 TENNIS COURT STRIPING 00001307 140051 06467 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 12,750.00 286510 7/1312006 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 412.85 139836 415787 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 412.85 286511 7113/2006 103366 TIME WARNER CABLE 659.33 CABLE TV ADVERTISING 139837 212781 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 659.33 CABLE TV ADVERTISING 139837 212781 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 659.34 CABLE TV ADVERTISING 139837 212781 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 1,978.00 286512 7/1312006 101474 TITLEIST 118.63 MERCHANDISE 139838 0495298 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 2,415.88 MERCHANDISE 139839 0476396 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES. 2,534.51 t y R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY Oh A Council Check Register 7/13/2006 -- 7/13/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 286513 7/13/2006 118704 TOWNSHEND, SCHUYLER 26.17 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 140052 070706 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 26.17 286514 711312006 103982 TRAFFIC CONTROL CORPORATION 1,575.42 LIGHTS 00001883 139962 21504 1330.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 1,575.42 286515 711312006 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 274.42 HYDRAULIC CYLINDER, HOSE 139963 T110296 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 274.42 286516 7/1312006 119977 U.S. TOY CO/CONSTRUCTIVE PLAYT 78.50 PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES 140054 8128105001 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 78.50 286517 7/13/2006 119973 UDVIG, JOSH 157.50 CABLE PRODUCTION SERVICES 140053 070706 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 157.50 286518 711312006 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 92.17 VALVES, NIPPLES 00001939 139964 191581 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 92.17 286519 7/13/2006 100050 USPS - HASLER 4,000.00 ACCT# 75983 139840 070606 1550.6235 POSTAGE 4,000.00 286520 7/1312006 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 284.58 BAGS 00007512 139841 641952 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 14.50 GLOVES 139842 641778 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 85.73 TOWELS, CUPS 00009193 139843 641173 5111.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 523.18 CAN LINERS 00001846 140055 642507 1645.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 907.99 286521 7/13/2006 104394 VANCE, LINDSEY 96.44 COSTUME CHARACTER, PLAYGROUND 140056 070406 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 96.44 286522 7/13/2006 102004 VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER COM 7/1 9:44:56 Page - 23 Business Unit COMMUNICATIONS TRAFFIC SIGNALS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PLAYGROUND & THEATER COMMUNICATIONS DISTRIBUTION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT LITTER REMOVAL PLAYGROUND & THEATER 280.24 SPRINKLER INSPECTION 140057 110127 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK R55CKREG LOG20000 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC CITY OF EDINA 3,258.00 140111 180841 Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,565.00 140112 180920 7/13/2006 - 7/13/2006 YORK SELLING Check # Date Amount Supplier ! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No -- Subledger Account Description - - -- -- 280.24 286528 711312006 101726 XCEL ENERGY 286523 7113/2006 103466 WASTE MANAGEMENT - SAVAGE MN 22.58 51- 7567037 -0 139847 74276836 1321.6185 4,025.54 REFUSE 139844 3641115 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5914.6185 LIGHT & POWER 1,261.65 REFUSE - ART FAIR 139845 3653696 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 3,104.23 REFUSE 139846 3653695 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 916.50 8,391.42 139851 74253474 5821.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 286524 7/1312006 139851 118998 WATKINS, BONNIE 5861.6185 LIGHT & POWER VERNON OCCUPANCY 1,533.50 51- 6979948 -4 139851 110.50 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 139986 070706 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 139852 74223963 110.50 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 5,214.11 51 -0966303 -6 139853 286525 7/13/2006 LIGHT & POWER 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 4,027.95 51- 6840050 -6 139854 74104935 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER 356.80 18,188.80 139900 144802 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE LIGHT & POWER ARENA BLDG /GROU' 436.80 139901 144804 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 48480 139902 144803 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,278.40 286526 7113/2006 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 905.27 139903 161438 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 411.44 139904 161627 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 631.46 140110 162053 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 7/12/2006 9:44:56 Page - 24 Business Unit 50TH STREET RUBBISH 50TH STREET RUBBISH 50TH STREET RUBBISH ART CENTER REVENUES YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING 286527 7/13/2006 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 3,258.00 140111 180841 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,565.00 140112 180920 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 100.00- 140113 180686 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5,723.00 286528 711312006 101726 XCEL ENERGY 22.58 51- 7567037 -0 139847 74276836 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 1,196.56 51- 5847121 -5 139848 74251067 5914.6185 LIGHT & POWER TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 19.53 51- 4151897 -6 139849 74250634 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 3,501.52 51- 6621207 -1 139850 74245099 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 916.50 51- 6979948 -4 139851 74253474 5821.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 1,356.86 51- 6979948-4 139851 74253474 5861.6185 LIGHT & POWER VERNON OCCUPANCY 1,533.50 51- 6979948 -4 139851 74253474 5841.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK OCCUPANCY 35,337.58 51- 5605640 -1 139852 74223963 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 5,214.11 51 -0966303 -6 139853 73966126 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 4,027.95 51- 6840050 -6 139854 74104935 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER 18,188.80 51- 4888627 -1 140114 74540632 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER ARENA BLDG /GROU' 7/12/2006 9:44:56 Page - 25 Business Unit CLUB HOUSE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL SENIOR CITIZENS RICHARDS GOLF COURSE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA .Council Check Register 7/13/2006 — 7/13/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 6,837.61 51- 6824328 -7 140115 74744630 5420.6185 LIGHT 8 POWER 78,153.10 286529 711312008, 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 101.19 JUNE USAGE 139855 018150764 5110.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 532.55 JUNE USAGE - ADMIN 00004060 139965 018150555 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 325.57 JUNE USAGE - PARK & REC 00004322 139966 018150557 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 56.08 APR - MAY -JUNE USAGE 00007191 140058 018150778 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,015.39 286530 7113/2006 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 285.49 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 00006320 139856 54161981 5430.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 285.49 517,351.19 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 517,351.19 Total Payments 517,351.19 7/12/2006 9:44:56 Page - 25 Business Unit CLUB HOUSE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL SENIOR CITIZENS RICHARDS GOLF COURSE R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/12/2006 9:46:13 Council Check Summary Page - 1 — 7/13/2006 7/13/2006 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 116,048.46 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 19,793.16 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 23,230.04 05100 ART CENTER FUND 3,700.08 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 261.87 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 3,879.74 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 25,707.01 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 50,595.65 05600 EDINBOROUGH/CENT LAKES FUND 11,045.08 05800 LIQUOR FUND 139,856.34 05900 UTILITY FUND 82,427.13 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 2,870.85 05950 RECYCLING FUND 37,935.78 Report Totals 517,351.19 We confirm to the best of our Icnowbfte and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing Holes and procedures d PLEASE NOTE: THE ATTACHED CORRESPONDENCE HAS BEEN DUPLEXED Page 1 of 1 Darlene Wallin From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 10:44 AM To: Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com Cc: Darlene Wallin Subject: FW: PROPOSED NATURE CENTER @ BREDESEN PARK Jennifer Bennerotte Communications & Marketing Director City of Edina 952 - 833 -9520 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 ibennerotte@ci.edina.mn.us From: JJuintah @aol.com [mailto:JJuintah @aol.com] Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 9:12 AM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: PROPOSED NATURE CENTER @ BREDESEN PARK I would like to register my opposition to the proposed Nature Center at Bredesen Park. One plus million could be spent in away that would benefit all residents and be much less disruptive. IT SIMPLY IS NOT A NECESSARY OR DESIRABLE EXPENDITURE. Jacqueline Andrews 5232 Duncraig Rd. 7/10/2006 Page 1 of 1 Darlene Wallin From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 10:42 AM To: John Keprios; Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @wilIis.com Cc: Darlene Wallin Subjer,t: FW: Bredesen Park Jennifer Bennerotte Communications & Marketing Director City of Edina 952 - 833 -9520 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 jennerotte @ci.edina.mn.us From: barbara drew [mailto:barbarajdrew @yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 10:41 AM To: Jennifer Bennerotte — Subject: Bredesen Park Edina Park Dept and City Council: Bredesen Park is a special place of solitude away from the buildings and traffic of the city. I especially appreciate its long expanses of green folliage. It is a quiet, peaceful place to walk or jog. Please do not destroy it by adding buildings to it! It seems that anywhere there is green, one can expect it will soon be developed. I have been so thankful this beautiful place has been preserved as a park, so it can't be developed and now someone has proposed it be developed. Please, NO! ! There are many places to meet and hold receptions and even have picnics, but there are few that are in their natural, undeveloped state. This park does not need to be studied. It needs to be simply enjoyed. Please leave it alone! Barbara Drew Sneak preview the all -new Yahoo.com. It's not radically different. Just radically better. 7/10/2006 Page 1 of 1 Darlene Wallin From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 10:35 AM To: Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com Cc: Darlene Wallin; John Keprios Subjedt: FW: Bredesen Park Jennifer Bennerotte Communications & Marketing Director City of Edina 952 - 833 -9520 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 jennerotte @ci.edina.mn.us From: Robert Tolles [mailto:rtolles @yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 10:12 AM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: Bredesen Park Dear Sirs, I am writing against the concept of buliding this new "educational nature center" in Bredesen Park with the attendant outbuildings. Bredesen is the ONLY park in Edina with some degree of wildness to it. The Barred Owl lives there. There is a fox den. It is where I saw my first Great Gray Owl hunting mice. The "inner circle" of Bredesen is a wonderful refuge and should be kept intact. The school children of Edina should continue to use the wonderful educational centers in Richfield or Saint Louis Park. It strikes me as quite wasteful for Edina to spend such money just so Edina can have "its own" nature center. So, put me down as opposing spending money for a "consultant" to draw up plans to make Bredesen just like every other park ... Bob Tolles 7143 Valley View Rd. Edina, MN 55439 Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC -to -Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢ /min or less. 7/6/2006 Darlene Wallin nom: Jennifer Bennerotte Monday, July 17, 2006 3:45 PM ,ent: To: Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com Cc: Darlene Wallin Subject: FW: mayor hoviand Jennifer Bennerotte Communications & Marketing Director City of Edina 952- 833 -9520 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 jbennerotte@ci.edina.mn.us - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Tim Creagan [mailto:tcreagan @mn.rr.com] Sent: Monday, July 17, 2066 3:37 PM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: to: mayor hovland 07 -17 -06 dear mayor hovland: my name is tim creagan and I'm a part of group, friends of edina nature center, who is trying to have a nature center built here in our city. his e-mail is just to serve and an update on what we, as a group, are doing. we had a general meeting at my home (6704 point drive) on 07- 10 -06. we discussed the feedback (both positive and negative) that has come out after our presentation to you and the city council on 06- 06 -06. we feel that our immediate needs are to check on the status of the needs assessment survey and to continue to spread the word in a clear and concise manner as to the intended nature of this project. so, we will pull elements of our power point and our business plan and tun them into conversation points. this way the philosophy of the nature center may be better conveyed to those who are in favor of it and oppose it. one idea of a structure, that was not made very clear in the power point presentation, was that of a zero emissions structure. to the knowledge of those at the meeting, the only such structure in the area is at the science museum in st. paul. this maybe another way to promote the edina nature center. not only as a place to learn about nature. but, a place to learn about ways to live in such a way that we reduce the need for electric and gas energies. our next meeting will be on monday, august 7th and i will let you know how things are progressing at that time. if you have any ideas, advice, suggestions etc. please feel free to pass them along to me and i will share them with the group. we are a very eager group. however, in many ways we are still learning as we go through this very exciting process. my best, tim creagan 6704 point drive edina, mn 55435 952.922.8622 (home) 1 To Whom It May Concern: Darlene Wallin From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 8:35 AM To: Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com Cc: Darlene Wallin; John Keprios Subject: FW: Mom's Letter Jennifer Bennerotte Communications & Marketing Director City of Edina 952 - 833 -9520 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 jennerotte @ci.edina.mn.us From: Jim Williams [ mailto :jim- williams33 @mn.rr.com] Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2006 3:42 PM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: Mom's Letter To Whom It May Concern: I have been a resident of Edina since June of 1967. There was an article in the Edina Sun about building a Nature Center at Bredesen Park. In my opinion, I don't think it would enhance this area. It is a beautiful park where people enjoy a quiet walk or run through a very unique wooded area. The nature center would change all this. I have enjoyed walking Bredesen Park for 27 years and hope it can be preserved for others to enjoy. Sincerely, Bonnie Williams 5809 Arbour Ave. Edina MN 7/17/2006 Page 1 of 1 Page 1 of 1 Darlene Wallin From: - Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 11:31 AM To: Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com Cc: Darlene Wallin Subject: FW: bredeson park Jennifer Bennerotte Communications & Marketing Director City of Edina 952 - 833 -9520 FAX 952 -826 -0390 jennerotte@ci.edina.mn.us From: ROBERT A REED [mailto:bokareed @msn.com] Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 11:08 AM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: bredeson park City Council: I am concerned with your proposed plan to change Bredesen Park to a "nature" park to be used by weddings and birthday parties. We are fortunate in Edina to have many such venues, i.e., Arneson, Braemar, Centennial, and Edinborough. All of these can be used for the parties in question. We currently have a wonderful true nature trail or trails at Bredesen. I and many others use the park every day. How many of you can say the same. Have you truly thought through the additional space needed for parking, and the nine -mile creek which runs through the park for which you would have to give up additional space for the water- shed. If you have extra money to spend, lets fix the streets and infrastructure, the park is great just the way it is. Thank you Karen Reed 7/17/2006 Page 1 of 1 Wayne Houle From: Roger Glanzer Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 3:58 PM To: Wayne Houle Subject: FW: Public Works Hi Wayne, Mark Jungwirth helped the person from the message below. Roger. From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 3:17 PM To: Roger Glanzer Subject: FW: Public Works Jennifer Bennerotte Communications & Marketing Director City of Edina 952 - 833 -9520 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 jennerotte @ci.edina.mn.us From: Jim Castle [mailto :james.castle @earthlink.net] Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 12:40 PM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: Public Works Public Works Dept. To whom it may concern: Last night I had a water leak at the main water valve in my home. I would like to thank the individual who at midnight took the call and was able to help me stop the leak from running through the night. It was a big relief that I could call the city at such a late hour to solve a water problem. Sincerely, Jim Castle Jim Castle 7300 Wooddale Ave. Edina, MN 55435 (952) 920 -9277 Home (612) 269 -1719 Cell iames.castle0earthlink.net 7/12/2006 -ro v2u edm2 61n"/"5 - � had cbn llla�;(- at1�/2 �t✓"! /04 Un�FfCl � �Ltornk dOXda �°"' � r�c�' p / /�p�, /�°oGahad� @aliwcw /4.tEC � Az //r�d.6�iu�t � lxia�ro db /f2f�l� �Earrni �fl Y1i( kospifaPso�u�� Mind �rr"a"9h�su�hyu�zte�ce. {��vrPac+� aX-Y�ce /77aovxl�N� - A Million aid - tee tkav%O — 75kA&*uA o DAO S SAME - IeI M� l� &v Received From Paul Bearmon via e-mail July 14, 2006 I am not for taking choices away. I •believe there need to be choices and reasonable ones. This is why Annie Glavin approached Park and Recreation in the first place. It is arbitrary that certain volunteer groups automatically receive access and others are told no. At the Park and Recreation meeting involving Annie Glavin the basketball board threatened to resign if Annie was given access. The folks involved made the point that if Annie received access other families might chose the option she was offering and this was not acceptable to them. There are other ways associations limit choices. There isn't much of a choice if a child has to commit to a given sport at an early age — to year round play — to costly programs - or suffer exclusion from higher -level participation later. It isn't a choice for a child or family if the only programs offered involve either excessive or minimal participation options. I do not want to limit the choice of Travel. For anyone not familiar with the concept, Travel is a more intense experience for the kids and involves more time and money and often involves some sort of tryout system. Different associations start the travel portion of their programs at different ages. My thinking is that at young ages any child, who wants to participate in "travel" = however that is defined, ought to have the opportunity to do so. What purpose is served by preventing young children who want to be active at more involved levels from participating? Excluding young children answers an adult need, not a child's. There is no research that supports defining kid's long -term athleticism before the onset of puberty.. And this is what happens because the early selection process sets up who will subsequently be playing travel and who drops out even though they had ability. The end result would be better teams at the high school level because more kids with ability and willing to work hard would stay involved. The idea that this would hold back the "truly gifted" is not supported by the research. As Bob Bigelow put it in his Book "Just let the Kids Play" - in watching a group of 40 6th grade boys basketball players he might have been able to find 4 or 5 that weren't as bad as the remainder —he could then have watched the remaining boys for three days and not told much difference between them. Bigelow was an NBA scout as well as player. The argument that there are not enough resources to support what I have just advocated is disingenuous. Of course there are not enough resources if you design your programs to give inordinate amounts of those resources to a very small number of kids. And if you wrongly believe that it is important to separate out kids before they have gone through puberty you will argue against such an approach. I'm reminded of a passage from an article on cutting kids from Cleveland's Hall of Fame sports writer Hal Lebovitz. I quote: "Doyt Perry, who, until his retirement, was one of the state's most successful coaches, in high school and later at Bowling Green State University, never cut a boy. I didn't care if 100 came out, and we got almost that many," he said. "If they want the football experience, they should have it. At Ohio State, Woody Hayes never sent a boy away, no matter how green or how puny." Do we really know more about this than Doyt Perry or Woody Hayes — and this was for participants at the college level! Received From Paul Bearmon via e -mail July 14, 2006 To go on to specific issues about our associations and the Task Force.... First - Many associations do a good job — but of course not all and not always. Their boards can change rapidly, or slowly. This might last for years at a time. So what happens when the association is not doing things that in the best interest of our children? The associations argue they are independent entities and the "government' or City has no business in looking at how they run their programs. At the last Task Force meeting the suggestion of "legal repercussions" was made if the city pursued any attempt to provide oversight. But associations are utilizing Public facilities, which are accessed at markedly reduced fees - with the breaks on the fees totaling tens of thousands of dollars. Because we are talking about public fields and facilities — the City has an obligation to ensure they are used in a manner consistent with an established set of criteria. And again, because these are public facilities being used to provide services to children the City has the .responsibility to ensure children are treated in a. manner consistent with their development and age. Parents come into the area of youth sports with little knowledge. There is a learning curve and many of the issues being brought up are discussed, argued and at times worked out. However, parents soon leave the area and there is no continuity. It is as though we start over again and again with the same concerns. There is no mechanism. in place to bring improvements forward and keep them in place. A Youth Sport Council would provide such a mechanism. Perhaps there was not a clear understanding of what the Task Force was suppose to address. However, many issues were.left on the table which were brought to their attention through the many emails received outlining community concerns about our youth.sport environment, and through a well attended open Public hearing. The central concern of associations receiving tens of thousands of dollars of public access - but without community oversight was not'addressed or explored. Neither was the issue of both house and travel programs being under the same association, which in some cases has large amounts of money being transferred from the house to the travel area and creates conflicts of interest in accessing resources. The issue of children being judged early and therefore having their athletic experiences "set' was not addressed. As stated, before puberty athletic talent is not predictable, yet this is when most associations do the selecting which has long term implications. This is irrational and prejudicial and similar to earlier policies of keeping woman away from sport facilities. Not addressed or questioned is the sometimes - disproportionate allocation of public resources given to children at ages as young as 9 or 10 based on these "judgments." The costs and time required of young children who might be interested in a travel program were not addressed. Nor the increasing requirement for year rounds play in orders to stay competitive. The drop out rate of 75% of children from youth sports by age 12 -13 was Received From Paul Bearmon via e-mail July 14, 2006 not addressed - nor the health or social implications of kids leaving sports early - From diabetes an obesity to becoming at risk teens. The entire issue of the various associations suggesting "no oversight of any sort was acceptable" was overlooked. In the May 3rd meeting legal action in response to a request for compliance with minimal standards was brought up as a threat — and needed a stern reply. Public, not private facilities are being accessed. The important issue of why a group that might offer a different approach than a given association (e.g. Annie Glavin's girls) not be given fair access if their program made good sense was not addressed. Finally, the grievance process as designed was a far cry from a group where a parent could voice a concern about a global issue (anonymously if necessary). It is a process no parent would likely ever utilize — as stated by one of the Task Force and Park Board members "why would we want to make it easy for parents to voice a concern." And as stated by the public many times — there is a lot of risk in a parent voicing concerns about a program. Even board members have been reprimanded for voicing concerns to the board. One of the arguments presented was that if a parent wanted to see change in an association they should join a board. From multiple perspectives this is problematic, time constraints being the most obvious, the difficulty of facing an entrenched old guard another. As I already said much of what we do serves adult needs, not the child's. People interested in accessing much of the material sent to the Task Force and Council can find it at the KEAP website - www.keap.net A productive next step would be a working group put together by the City Council to devise an effective approach to these issues. A Sports Council modeled after the School Board concept is one idea and a good one. Surrounding communities and cities across the country are already exploring various options to get a handle on the youth sport environment. Edina need not be left behind. Park and Recreation departments throughout the country, including ours, have stated they are not interested in overseeing youth sport activity. Therefore this needs to be done independently of Park and Recreation. Edina has a unique opportunity to be a leader in the area of youth sports. I am confident Edina can create a situation that is a win win — for our kids, for our sports scene, for our associations and for our children's well being. It would also be a big win for the city of Edina itself. Edina's reputation as a leader in looking out for its' children would only benefit. Page 1 of 2' Darlene Wallin From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 1:37 PM To: Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; sGot.housh @willis.com Cc: Darlene Wallin Subject: FW: Cascade Lane support for completing the HW100 soundwall Jennifer Bennerotte Communications & Marketing Director City of Edina 952- 833 -9520 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 jennerotte@ci.edina.mn.us From: bobfiedler @aol.com [mailto:bobfiedler @ aol.com] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 9:14 AM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Cc: dknoer @riderlaw.com; gigiknoer @mn.rr.com Subject: Cascade Lane support for completing the HW100 soundwall Honorable Mayor and Council Members, We wish to add our support and appreciation for the efforts to complete the HW100 soundwall on the west side south to the 50th Street exit. The addition of the soundwall to the Cascade Lane area has provided significant improvement for direct road noise reduction and the elimination of visual distraction of the movement on the highway. However, we have experienced a significant increase in the creek side noise coming from south of the bridge down Minnihaha Creek due to the discontunance of wall going south. We were disturbed that a minority of residents on the SW quadrant opposed the wall after previously understanding that the wall was widely supported by the neighbors involved and we were led to believe that no additional support was needed. Your efforts and concurrance to reactivate the completion of the soundwall project will be greatly appreciated. If additional hearings or meetings concerning the completion of the soundwall are scheduled, we would like to be notified so that we can participate and support the efforts. Thank you for your ongoing support and service. Best regards, Bob and Carol Fiedler 7/7/2006 Page 2 of 2 4604 Cascade Lane 952 - 926 -9864 home 612 - 810 -0612 cell Check out AOL.com today. Breaking news, video search, pictures, email and IM. All on demand. Always Free. 7/7/2006 Page 1 of 1- Darlene Wallin From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 6:58 AM To: Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com Cc: Darlene Wallin Subject: FW: sound wall petition from minnehaha creek to 50th on highway 100 From: Leedharn @aol.com [mailto:Leedharn @aol.com] Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 4:50 PM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Cc: gigiknoer @mn.rr.com Subject: sound wall petition from minnehaha creek to 50th on highway 100 Dear Ms.Bennerotte, We are sending tihs email in support of the subject petition. We hope the city will approve the petition so the wall can be completed. This would benefit our property to reduce the noise level from the area south of the bridge. Could you Please forward copies to The Mayor and the Council Members Thank you, Beverly and Lee Harness 4609 Cascade Ln Edina 7/14/2006 Page 1 of 1 Darlene Wallin From: Bettyhemstad @aol.com Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2006 8:40 AM To: all.kieffer @att.net; Diana Hedges; Brad Benn; jkeprois @ci.edina.mn.us; caroline269 @netzero.com; WFGreer @aol.com; KathWeth @tcq.net; dcrockett @mn.rr.com; imasica @ci.edina.mn.us; kbcrealtor @yahoo.com; Gordon Hughes; Jim Hovland; Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: Grandview Park Hello All, We are back in Edina for a couple of days from our "other home" on the Gunflint Trail. At the top of my to -do list was to stop over at Grandview Park. , What a perfectly wonderful experience it was! It is indeed a peaceful oasis set in the middle of a lot of activity. After five seconds I didn't notice the cars buzzing around the circle or the planes roaring overhead. First, I was transported to the forest and could almost hear the raven's raspy call. Then it was back to my childhood when it was OK to jump into a huge pile of leaves with an imagination to see a leaf chair waiting to catch me. Finally, the Nordic Serpent had me looking over the deck of a steamer in a Norwegian Fjord imagining this exquisite "monster" slithering in the cool, crystal clear, brilliant blue water. What a trip! What a glorious experience! Now the purpose of this note is to say THANK YOU to all of.you who made this experience happen right here in Edina. Public Art is important. Public Art is possible because some made the difficult decisions to set the Public Art wheels turning. It is also possible because there were volunteers who agonized over the Who, What, When and Where over the last couple of years. My thanks go out to each and every one of you. My hope is- that the people of Edina know that the sculpture garden exists s. We shouldn't look back... but... wouldn't it have been a great opportunity to have had the Nordic Serpent on the cover of About Town? In one day everyone in our City would have been talking about Grandview Park. It would have been a perfect lead -in to the article "Your City, Your Art." Again, my sincere thanks, Betty Hemstad 7/10/2006 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD TUESDAY, JUNE 13, 2006, AT 7:00 P.M. EDINA CITY HALL — MAYOR'S CONFERENCE ROOM 4801 WEST 50TH STREET MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Bob Kojetin, Marie Thorpe, Chris Rofidal, Lou Blemaster, Laura Benson, Nancy Scherer, and Ian Yue MEMBERS ABSENT: Karen Ferrara, and Arlene Forrest STAFF PRESENT: Joyce Repya, Associate Planner OTHERS PRESENT: Robert Vogel, Heritage Preservation Consultant I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: Member Thorpe moved for approval of the minutes from the April 11, 2006 meeting. Member Yue seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. II. DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE HERITAGE PRESERVATION PLAN: Consultant Vogel presented the Board with a completed draft copy of the Comprehensive Heritage Preservation Plan for their review. The major elements of the plan include the Introduction, Mission, Vision, Objectives with related Issues and Actions, Historic Contexts and an Inventory of historic properties. He pointed out that a brief history of preservation in the city could be added to the Introduction and a map identifying the designated and eligible landmarks could be added to the Inventory. Mr. Vogel reminded the Board that they have reviewed the individual elements of the plan as they were created and now that the plan is complete, if the Board agrees to adopt the plan, it will be handed over to the planners who are working on the City's overall Comprehensive Plan. Vogel noted that the HPB will not present the Heritage Preservation Plan to the City Council at this time because the plan actually makes up one of the chapters in the City's overall Comprehensive Plan which is in the process of being updated. The Board asked for clarification regarding some items within the plan as they discussed the following eleven objectives: Objective #1: Prepare. and adopt a heritage preservation plan. Minutes — June 13, 2006 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Objective #2: Identify significant heritage resources worthy of consideration in community planning. Objective #3: Evaluate heritage resources to determine whether they meet defined criteria of historical, architectural, archaeological, or cultural significance. Objective #4: Rezone significant heritage resources as Edina Heritage Landmarks or Landmark Districts. Objective #5: Protect heritage landmarks through design review. Objective #6: Carry out public facilities maintenance and construction projects in such a manner that significant heritage resources are not destroyed or damaged. Objective #7: Encourage voluntary compliance with historic preservation treatment standards. Objective #8: Preserve significant heritage resources on city property. Objective #9: Provide public education in heritage preservation. Objective #10 Participate in the federal -state -local government heritage preservation partnership. Objective #11 Be prepared to respond to disasters involving heritage resources. Consultant Vogel pointed out that the Heritage Preservation Plan provides a blue print for the entire city. Because it encompasses the entire city, it is somewhat general in nature. One will find more specifics in the individual plan of treatment adopted for each of the designated properties. General discussion ensued among the Board about the adoption of the plan. Member Thorpe asked if the history of preservation to be added to the Introduction and the map of designated properties for the Inventory needed to be completed prior to adopting the plan. Consultant Vogel stated that the Board could approve the plan subject to staff signing off on the history of preservation and designation map. Board members agreed that rather than continuing the discussion of the plan to the July meeting, it would be a good idea to move on the plan and allow staff to approve the final details. Member Thorpe then moved to adopt the Comprehensive Heritage Preservation Plan subject to staff's approval of the history of preservation and the landmark inventory map. Member Rofidal seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. 7 Minutes — June 13, 2006 Edina Heritage Preservation Board III. SOUTHDALE'S 50T" ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION: Chairman Kojetin explained that he and Planner Repya attended a meeting at the Edina Historical Society with Rachel Macht, a marketing representative from Southdale regarding the upcoming 50th Anniversary celebration for the mall. At this time, Southdale is starting to formulate their plans and are open to suggestions and assistance from both the Historical Society and the Heritage Preservation Board. Currently, they are anticipating kicking off a 50 day celebration on the 1St of October to culminate with a gala to coincide with the holiday shopping season. Kojetin added that he has been in contact with Marty Ruud who was instrumental in the opening festivities for the mall in 1956. Mr. Ruud is retired, still living in Edina and would probably be thrilled to be a part of the anniversary celebration. Planner Repya stated that she suggested Ms. Macht contact some of the planners of the high school reunions that will be occurring this summer to gain insight into the Southdale memories the Edina grads hold dear. Consultant Vogel pointed out that Southdale Mall has been identified as one of the Tier II Historic Contexts in the Historic Context Study. Within the study, the goal of identifying and recording historically important art objects and fixtures associated with the mall, as well as exploring preservation alternatives to identifying the mall as an historic preservation site were recognized as priorities. Vogel added that the 50th anniversary would be an ideal time to target those planning goals. Board members agreed that they would be pleased to participate in the celebration. Chairman Kojetin promised to keep the Board advised of the progress. No formal action was taken. IV. OTHER BUSINESS: A. 6001 Pine Grove Road — Maryhill Planner Repya explained that Maryhill, the home at 6001 Pine Grove Road was built by Dr. Paul and Mrs. Mary Carson in 1941, and designed by renowned architect William Gray Purcell. Dr. Carson recently passed away and the home will be going on the market this summer. As a means of introducing the home to the public, tours were offered over three dates in June. The Board received notice of the tours; apparently, none of the members made it to the open house. Responding to questions regarding whether the property was eligible for landmark designation, Ms. Repya explained that at least ten years ago, the HPB pursued landmark designation of the property, however Dr. and Mrs. Carson chose to list their 3 Minutes — June 13, 2006 Edina Heritage Preservation Board property with the Minnesota Land Trust rather than applying the local historic designation. Board members thanked Ms. Repya for the information. No formal action was taken. B. Paul Peterson House Tour — 5312 Interlachen Boulevard Consultant Vogel explained that as part of his Interlachen Trail research he has identified most of the historic properties abutting the proposed trail on the north side of Interlachen. The Paul Peterson house is one of the historic homes, and because there are so many new members on the Heritage Preservation Board, a tour of this landmark designated home would be a good opportunity to provide insight into the characteristics of a landmark property. Planner Repya offered to contact Paul and Nancy Winter to schedule a time when the Board could meet at their home and discuss its historic significance. She indicated that depending on the Winter's schedule, she would attempt to schedule the tour prior to the July or August meetings. No formal action was taken. C. Interlachen Country Club — 6200 Interlachen Boulevard Consultant Vogel advised the Board that he attended a meeting with the Manager of the Interlachen Country Club to gain information for the survey of the historic properties abutting the proposed Interlachen Trail. He observed that the club house has been renovated so many times that it would no longer qualify for landmark designation. However, the golf course remains relatively unchanged from the original course designed by Donald Ross in 1911. Discussion ensued regarding the significance of the course. Mr. Vogel indicated that it is possible that the golf course could be eligible for National Register designation and /or Edina Landmark designation due to the age of the course-and the fact that Donald Ross was such a famous golf course designer. Furthermore, Vogel pointed out that the members of club appreciate the history of the original course and may look favorably upon a landmark designation. No formal action was taken. D. 2006 State Historic Preservation Conference — Sept. 28 & 29 in Red Wing Chairman Kojetin announced that the State Historic Preservation Conference will be held on Thursday and Friday, September 28 and 29 in Red Wing, Minnesota. Because Edina is a Certified Local Government, we are required to send at least one Board member to at least one day of the conference. Kojetin pointed out that in the past, members have attended that Friday sessions and found them very beneficial. Planner Repya explained that the City will pay the registration of Board members wishing to attend and promised to keep the Board advised once the registration opens up. Minutes — June 13, 2006 Edina Heritage Preservation Board E. Goals for Future Designations Chairman Kojetin asked Consultant Vogel about the timeline for future landmark designations. Vogel explained that under the terms of his contract, two designations per year are doable. The process takes about four months per designation and it is best to take on one designation at a time. Kojetin asked Mr. Vogel to provide the Board with information regarding the cost per designation - pointing out that in the event the Board would choose to undertake four designations per year, he would like to know what the additional cost would be. Mr. Vogel agreed that he would provide that information. F. Street Name Change — W. 56th Street to Surrey Lane Member Rofidal updated the Board on the progress he and his committee have made relative to preparing the petition for the street name change. He met with the Building Coordinator, Steve Kirchman to report that a survey was mailed to 40 neighbors; a total of 25 Yes responses have been received; 8 No responses; 5 responses not returned; and 2 need more information. Mr. Kirchman indicated that the response data indicated 30% favorable rating. He suggested that the committee work on the 5 households that did not return their survey to see if they were in favor, thus increasing the current 30% favorable rating. Mr. Kirchman also indicated that it would be helpful if the committee received an endorsement from the Historical Society and the Heritage Preservation Board. Addressing the question about the concerns of the households that voted No, Member Rofidal stated that some people wondered if their mortgage or deed would have to be changed — the answer is no; others were concerned about the disruption with the post office. However, he discovered that the post office will deliver to both street addresses for a 1 year period of time. Member Scherer observed that because West 56th Street runs intermittently from France Avenue on the east side of Edina to Hansen Road on the west side, it can be very confusing when trying to find an address if one is not familiar with the house numbering system. A brief discussion ensued among the Board. Member Blemaster then moved that the Heritage Preservation Board provide Mr. Rofidal and his committee with a resolution supporting the name change of their street from West 56th Street to Surrey Lane in keeping with the developer's original plan to provide English names for the streets in the neighborhood. Member Scherer seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. 5 Minutes — June 13, 2006 Edina Heritage Preservation Board V. NEXT MEETING DATE: -July 11th to be rescheduled Chairman Kojetin announced that the next regularly scheduled meeting on July 11 th falls on the evening of the Annual Braemar Inspection Tour. He asked that the meeting be rescheduled to the next evening, Wednesday, July 12th at 7:00 p.m. Board members agreed that change of date to July 12th would work for them. No formal action was taken. VI. ADJOURNMENT: 9:00 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Jayc&Repyw 9 Page 1 of 1 Darlene Wallin From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 8:32 AM To: Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com Cc: Darlene Wallin Subject: FW: To the Mayor of Edina Jennifer Bennerotte Communications & Marketing Director City of Edina 952 - 833 -9520 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 jennerotte@ci.edina.mn.us ..From: Robert Calgren [mailto:rcalgren @mn.rr.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 6:57 PM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: To the Mayor of Edina Dear Mayor: After all the derogatory television and newspaper coverage of Southdale this past week, I think it's imperative that the. City of Edina get actively involved in insuring this valuable property no longer continues to be mismanaged. Year after year it becomes less appealing to shop there. A trip out to Eden Prairie Center shows anyone with a sense of marketing and management how incompetently Southdale has been managed. Anyone with a memory of how Southdale looked 20 years ago also knows how incompetently it has been managed. Selling the property is not an excuse. Hoping something can be done, Robert Calgren 4713 Virginia Lane Edina 7/12/2006 John Keprios, Director Edina Park & Recreation Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Office (952) 826 -0430 FAX (952) 826 -0385 Jkeprios @ci.edina.mn.us Memo To: Mayor and ci Members. From: John Kep os CC: Gordon Hu Date: July 14, 2006 Re: Needs Assessment Survey Interviews. The Park Board's needs assessment survey consultant, Ron Vine from ETC Institute(lAsure Vision, would like to interview each Council Member as part of the needs assessment survey process. Mr. Vine is suggesting that he interview one and no more than two Council Members at a time. Attached is a schedule of interview times set up for Thursday, August 3, 2006. I ask that the Mayor and Council please choose their preferred times to meet with our consultant. Thank you! Also attached is a draft copy of the publicity piece to inform the community of how they can be involved in the process. Needs Assessment Survey Interview Schedule (all meetings are at Edina City Hall) Wednesday, August 2, 2006 Noon to 1:15 p.m. Park and Recreation Department Staff; Community Room 4:00 p.m. to 5:15 p.m. Park Board Ad -Hoc Committee; Mayor's Conference Room 5:30 p.m. to 6:45 p.m. General Focus Group; Council Chambers 7:00 p.m. to 8:15 p.m. Environment and Conservation Focus Group; Council Chambers Thursday, August 3, 2006 7:30 a.m. to 8:00 a.m. City Council Member; Mayor's Conference Room 8:00 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. City Council Member; Mayor's Conference Room 8:30 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. City Council Member; Mayor's Conference Room 9:00 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. City Council Member; Mayor's Conference Room 9:30 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. City Council Member; Mayor's Conference Room Noon to 1:15 p.m. Athletics Focus Group; Council Chambers PARK AND RECREATION NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEY YOUR INPUT IS REQUESTED The Edina Park and Recreation Department and Edina Park Board has hired the consulting firm of ETC Institute/Leisure Vision to conduct a Needs Assessment Survey to learn how the community feels about current and proposed park and recreation facilities and services. This will be a random survey mailed to over 500 households throughout Edina in September of 2006. To ensure that the survey addresses the issues of most importance to the community, it is important to get your input into the survey process. Therefore, the Edina Park and Recreation Department is asking for your input which you can provide in a number of ways of your choice. You may submit your suggestions in the form of questions that you feel that should be asked in the survey by sending them by postal mail to: Needs Assessment Survey Attention: John Keprios, Director Edina Park and Recreation Department 4801 West 50`h Street Edina, MN 55424 O Email your suggestions /questions to EdinaMail(d�ci.edina.mn.us; or visit the City of Edina's website at www.cityofedina.com and click on EMAIL. The Edina Park and Recreation Department is also conducting three separate Focus Groups as another venue to share your proposed suggestions/questions. The Focus Groups are set up into three different categories: General Focus QLouR The General Focus Group will be held on Wednesday, August 2, 2006, from 5:30 p.m. to 6:45 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Edina City Hall. This focus group is intended to address suggestions for general park facilities and services; such as, current and proposed facilities and services in your neighborhood and community parks, and enterprise facilities and services, such as, Braemar Golf Course, Edinborough Park, Edina Aquatic Center, etc. Environment and Conservation Focus Groun The Environment and Conservation Focus Group will be held on Wednesday, August 2, 2006, from 7:00 p.m. to 8:15 p.m. in Council Chambers, Edina City Hall. This focus group is intended to address issues that deal with natural resource management, conservation, citizen proposal to develop a nature center in Bredesen Park, and other issues of importance that deal with our natural resources; such as, forestry and water quality. Athletics Focus Group The Athletics Focus Group will be held on Thursday, August 3, 2006, from 12:00 noon to 1:15 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Edina City Hall. This focus group is intended to address issues that deal with youth and adult athletic programs and facilities, including your ideas for facility improvements or additions. If you have any questions about the process, feel free to contact the Director of the Edina Park and Recreation Department John Keprios at (952) 826 -0430. gobe -i Co&l 5609 Heather Lane Edina MN 55436 -1205 Home: Voice and Fax (952) 922 -3091 Office: Voice (952) 484 -7210 Fax (952) 448 -9427 June 15, 2006 DICK CROCKETT, Executive Director EDINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATON 5280 GRANDVIEW SQUARE EDINA, MN 55436 RE: Fire Incident #06 -907 Dick: In appreciation for the outstanding job done by Tom Jensen and his crew on Saturday March 18, 2006, I would like the enclosed contribution applied toward the Edina Fire Department's purchase of a Thermal Infra Imaging Camera The Infra Camera used that night was the "sole" reason my house was not extensively damaged by the fire crew in determining the source and extent of the fire. There was no visible flame. There was only smoke pouring through.the roof, out the back of the chimney into the garage and out of the downstairs fireplace. The camera was able to isolate the fire's nucleus. It was on the main floor between the wall above the fireplace mantle and below the ceiling face plate. It had not spread across the ceiling's crawl space from one end of the house to the other as indicated by the smoke pouring through the roof. The insurance company's adjuster related a story of a fire with the same characteristics in a house of same design as mine. In both situations, the smoke indicated the fire had spread into the ceiling crawl space and across to the other end of the house. In that situation, the house's roof, many ceilings, floors and walls had to be repaired and/or replaced because they were opened or sustained collateral damage in the search to locate the actual fire. It was months before the residents were able to resume living in their home. I, on the other hand, was out for 30 days and most of those days were occupied getting the estimates from the sub - contractors and the insurance adjusters' agreement on the total estimate for all the repairs. Needless to say, the camera's intrinsic value in saved mental and emotional stress, family displacement expenses and the cost to repair my home back to it's to pre -fire condition is far greater than its market value. Tom and the crew members are also to be commended for the care and thoughtfidness in the manner with which they moved the wall hanging, the furniture and the nick knacks without incurring breakage or other damage. The attention to getting the water off the floor as soon possible rather than leaving a puddle meant the hardwood floor dried before mole could get started so it did not have to be replaced. Please feel free to share my story with Insurance companies and others as you solicit funds for this vital piece of fire fighting equipment. Sincerely, It.- Gabbert & Beck - 3510 GALLERIA, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55435 -4269 (612) 925 -4321 Fax (612) 925 -2965 DATE: July 17, 2006 A TO: Merchants FROM: Warren Beck RE: Westin Edina Galleria If you have driven by or through the east side of our parking lot, you'll know that the new ramp is well underway. As we head into this exciting phase, we truly appreciate your enthusiasm and participation in the project. In fact, nearly all Galleria merchants have put their full support behind it; and the support of the community and city has been tremendous. Also, you may have seen in last week's Sun Current that nearly two - thirds of the condominiums have been reserved. We want to make you aware that one of our tenants, Barnes and Noble, has chosen to take legal action to try to stop the project. We believe that we will prevail in the legal proceedings and that the project will continue on schedule. While their lawsuit against the hotel and condominiums is pending, Galleria staff and the Westin Edina Galleria team cannot comment further on this legal matter. We appreciate your understanding that we cannot provide details to you at this time. Please know that we all remain fully committed to the project. We believe, as many of you do, that the Westin Edina Galleria Hotel and Residences will be a prized asset to the community, city, and to the Galleria. Thank you 1Q1 Bike -Walk Advisory Council Members (confirmed as of 7/14/06) 1. Shonda Allen Powderhorn Park Neighborhood Assoc. (Elena Gaarder — alternate) 2. Lisa Austin Twin Cities Bicycle Coalition, State Bicycle Advisory Committee 3. Chuck Ballentine Hennepin County Housing Community Works, and Transit Director 4. Billy Binder Hennepin County Bike Adv. Comm., Mpls. Bicycle Advisory Committee S. John Dillery Metropolitan Transit, Senior Transit Planner (Craig Lamothe — alt) 6. Michael Foster Minneapolis Disability Advisory Council 7. Shawntera Hardy City of St. Paul Planning Department, planner 8. Katie Hatt Longfellow Neighborhoods Executive Director 9. Michael Huber Public Health Active Living leader 10. Connie Kozlak Metropolitan Council Planner (James Andrew — alternate) 11. Robert Lilligren Minneapolis City Council (Sandy Colvin Roy — alternate) 12. Christine Manning psychologist specializing in fostering sustainable behavior 13. Nick Mason Dero Manufacturing, Mpls Bike Advisory Committee 14. Tim Mitchell Federal Highway Administration - Minnesota Division 15. Louis Moore Office of Congressman Sabo 16. Gay Noble Streets for People, pedestrian advocate 17. Joan Pasiuk University of Minnesota Public Health 18. Antonio Rosell C -D -G Design Group, urban planner and engineer 19. RT Rybak Mayor of Minneapolis. (Peter Wagenius, alternate) 20. Steve Sanders University of Minnesota Parking and Traffic Division 21. Gary Sjoquist Quality Bicycle Products, Bikes Belong director 22. Scott Smedberg Andersen School, Mpls. Parks — liaison for immigrant communities 23. Russ Stark Midway TMO Executive Director 24. Robert Vanasek Office of Congressman Oberstar 25. Jon Wertjes City of Minneapolis Department of Public Works 26. Bob Works I Mn /DOT Transit Division, Bike and Pedestrian Section Director TLC Staff: Steve Clark, Barb Thoman, Katie Eukel TLC Board Reps: Chuck Holtman, Greg Pratt, Bill Smith Budget and Timeline TLC anticipates that about 1/3 of the expendable funds will be used for non - infrastructure programs and projects, including ped /bike operations (markings, signage, etc.). This means that the City of Minneapolis may be passing through to TLC as much as $8 million over a four or five year period. TLC will also be directing the allocation of the funds for the construction of new facilities (infrastructure) and Mn /DOT will provide reimbursement directly to the grantees. The City of Minneapolis, adjoining municipalities to Minneapolis, Hennepin County and Ramsey County are all potential recipients for these funds. It is anticipated that a project solicitation process will be announced later this summer with major projects selected for funding in early 2007. Much of the focus in 2006 will be on assessing the existing conditions and determining where the greatest needs are. After the baseline data is collected in September 2006, some low -cost improvements will be advocated and funded perhaps as early as October. It is also anticipated that there will be a public information campaign launched during the fall 2006. L 'Ickes aS�` � �� -� Non - motorized Transportation Pilot Project Update July 17,2006 After six months of detailed discussions with federal, state and local agencies, Transit for Livable Communities (TLC) will proceed with a $25 million 4 -year federal pilot program intended to help people reduce dependence on automobiles by improving walking and bicycling conditions in the Minneapolis area. On June 1, 2006, TLC's Work Plan (attached) received formal approval from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Tim Mitchell, FHWA transportation specialist at the Minnesota Division said he was pleased with the Work Plan and was encouraged by TLC's commitment to strong public involvement and "making this a truly collaborative effort." The Non - motorized Transportation Pilot Project (NTP) was authorized by the Federal Government last August as part of the SAFETEA -LU transportation bill. The Minneapolis area is one of four communities designated to serve as a pilot in determining "the extent to which bicycling and walking can carry a significant part of the transportation load, and represent a major portion of the transportation solution." The other three pilot communities are Sheboygan, WI; Marin County, CA; and Columbia, MO. Only in Minnesota was an independent non - profit (TLC) designated to carry out the program. The Work Plan submitted by TLC lists the City of Minneapolis as TLC's fiscal agent. Because the program falls under the State Aid Process, the funds are first released to Mn /DOT by the FHWA. But since Mn /DOT cannot allocate funds to a non - taxing authority, TLC needs a fiscal agent to carry out their administrative duties under federal law. Program Evaluation TLC has been working closely with the FHWA's national office and other pilot project communities to develop a rigorous methodology to evaluate and measure the success of this program. An RFP was sent out to the University of Minnesota and several other public universities for this consulting service. Baseline travel data will be collected in September 2006, and again in September 2010 at the end of the pilot program to determine modal split among Minneapolis residents. The law also specifies that the communities document health benefits, energy conservation, and pollution reduction. The selected . university will provide an interim report (2007) and a final report (2010) to Congress with their findings. TLC plans on supplementing the work by the consulting university with regular bike and ped counts at many different locations, and With project specific measurements. Protect / Location Eligibility , Using the language of the law and subsequent interpretations by the FHWA, the Work Plan clarifies the kinds of projects that will be eligible for the federal funding, including the question of location. Funds can be used for education and promotion as well as for the building of facilities. The focus is on Minneapolis with consideration for access to Minneapolis from adjoining communities. The funds are available until expended, require no match and cannot be used for other purposes. Bike -Walk Advisory Council (B -WAC) An Advisory Council will have its first meeting on July 18th at the City Hall. Its role is to advise the TLC Board of Directors on which projects to fund, rating proposals on the basis of their ability to induce a shift from driving to walking and bicycling. A selection criteria process will be recommended by B -WAC for adoption by the TLC Board of Directors. The B -WAC will make recommendations to the TLC Board of Directors for both infrastructure and non- infrastructure projects. TLC will also provide opportunities for the broader public to have input throughout the project. The---.B-'W'- AC participants are listed .below: Page 1 of 1 Darlene Wallin From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 12:53 PM To: Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com Cc: Darlene Wallin Subjedt: FW: Message to the City Council Re: High rise development along France Avenue Jennifer Bennerotte Communications & Marketing Director City of Edina 952 - 833 -9520 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 jennerotte @ci.edina.mn.us From: Lorenzo Tunesi [mailto:lorenzo.tunesi @gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 10:45 AM To: Jennifer . Bennerotte Subject: Re: Message to the City Council Re: High rise development along France Avenue Dear Members of the City Council, Thank you for your continued interest in bike paths in Edina. The creation of a Bikeway Task Force is a step in the right direction. Please keep moving in the direction of bike paths in Edina, they are an amenity that is sorely lacking in our city. Lorenzo Tunesi 4413 Ellsworth Drive Edina, MN 55435 7/18/2006 VERY IMPORTANT: City of Edina Odd -Even Sprinkling Policy and Mid -day Ban The Edina Public Works Department is reminding property owners to follow the City's odd -even sprinkling policy, which went in to effect May 1 and continues through August. In addition: Mid -day Watering Ban: Lawn sprinkling will not be allowed between the hours of 11 -mm. and S p.m. Odd / Even: Homes and businesses with even - numbered addresses may water their lawns on even - numbered dates of the week. Homes with odd - numbered addresses may water on odd - numbered dates. For example, the family living at 4532 Parkside Lane could water their lawn on even - numbered dates such as June 22, 24, 26 and so on. Reset your sprinkler: The Utility Department reminds property owners that some automatic sprinkler systems must be reset at the end of months that have 31 days because there are two odd - numbered dates in a row. Rain sensors can be purchased for automatic sprinkler systems. A rain sensor is a device that shuts off a sprinkler system if rain is detected. In addition to conserving water, quickly repairing broken or misdirected water heads can minimize utility bills. If the weather becomes exceptionally dry for an extended period, additional water restrictions might be put into place. Thank you for your cooperation. City of udi" ktilite ACpRrt`tcent Revised 7 -17 -06 City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 (3E3 00 CITY OF EDINA .Edina Water Update Watering Bans in effect: Odd Even. Mid -day -11 am to 5 pm Edina Water Supply • 18 Wells: ■ One down for emergency repairs, ■ Three down for scheduled repairs issues. • Pumping Capacity (current): ■ 14 Wells .......... 13,600 gallons per minute • Storage Capacity: ■ 6.5 million gallons July 18, 2006 BA 332 1 Edina Water Demand 0: 13,335 Connections: 3 ■ 6,700 Connections per given da for Odd / Even.. ■ Typical Sprinkler - 3.5 gpm ■ Typical Day: ( Current Well Capacity is 13,600 gpm) • 1/2 Of Connections = 23,000 gpm 1,380,000 gallons per hour J, • 1/ of Connections = 11,700 gpm s 690,000 gallons per hour July 18, 2006 C Edina Water Demands • Fire Demand: ■ Typical House Fire — 1000 to 2000 gpm ■ 60,000 to 120,000 gallons per,fire ■ 1/3 Connections = 15,600 gpm ■ 11/2 hours to-2 hours to min pressure in system a July 18, 2006 BA 332 2 BA 332 Conclusion "Not every property in the City can irrigate their lawns at once." Abide by the: "Odd/ Even with midday (11 -5) Sprinkling ban" July 18, 2006 3 - RECP,EATIONAL FIRE APPLICATION & PERMIT Edina Fire Department 6250 Tracy Avenue Edina, MN 55436 -2580 IF (952) 826 -0330 Fax (952) 826 -0393 RECREATIONAL FIRE APPLICATION & PERMIT Requirements listed below shall apply to all recreational fires Page 1 of 2 1. All non - recreational fires shall be considered "open 10. An approved form of fire extinguisher shall be readily burning" and a special permit shall be required. Open available at all times. This may be an extinguisher, burning permits may be requested at the Edina Fire hose, or other equipment designed for such use. Department Fire Prevention Bureau, during normal 11. The wood to be burned shall be clean and produce business hours. little detectable smoke or odor. Only split and dry 2. Recreational fires must be on private property and the fireplace wood, minimum 3 inches in diameter shall be property owner shall make application for this permit. used. No treated wood, construction materials, yard 3. Permits are valid only for the calendar year. waste (leaves, grass, twigs, etc.) shall be burned. 4. Fires are not permitted between the hours of 12:00 12. Oils, combustible and flammable liquids, rubber, midnight and 7:00 a.m. plastics, chemically treated materials, construction 5. Fires shall be contained within a fire ring, pit, or similar materials, hazardous waste, and rubbish /trash, shall device constructed for such use. not be burned or used, as starting material. No 6. The fire shall not be located within 25 feet of any flammable or combustible liquids shall be used to structure unless contained in a fireplace or manufactured kindle or rekindle a fire. wood - burning appliance, designed for burning wood, and 13. In all cases, the total fuel load of the fire shall not having an enclosed firebox and /or screening. exceed 3 feet in diameter and 2 feet in height. 7. The fire in a wood - burning appliance shall not be located 14. The prevailing wind at the time of burning shall be within 10 feet of structures. away from nearby residences and must be less than 15 8. The area within a 5 -foot radius around the fire or device mph. shall be reasonably dear of combustibles. The area 15. The fire must be attended at all times by at least one directly above the fire shall be clear of all combustibles. responsible person 18 years of age or older. 9. Notify your neighbors about your recreational fire. 16. The fire must be completely extinguished before leaving it unattended. (Use care when extinguishing the fire to avoid throwing embers into the air and to prevent damage if a manufactured device is in use. Prior to starting the fire the permit holder shall contact the Edina Fire Department. (952) 826 -0330 The Edina Fire Department or the MN DNR may restrict recreational fires during periods of high fire danger. Traditionally, this has occured during the month of April until about May 15th. In such an event, any outstanding open fire permits shall be rendered void. Fires may be ordered extinguished and this permit revoked by the Fire Department if: a) any recreational fire requirement is violated, or b) if a fire hazard exists or develops, or c) we receive valid complaints from your neighbors regarding the fire or smoke. Observation of these requirements does not release persons of any liability for damages that may result from a recreational fire. * indicates a required field * Name of Homeowner * Address * Telephone http:/ /www.ci.edina.nm.us /form/L6 -03a FireRecApplication.asp 7/17/2006 - RECI;EATIONAL FIRE APPLICATION & PERMIT Page 2 of 2 * Email El I understand that some of the information provided on this form will be public data. Public data is available to anyone who makes a request for such information. My credit card number is not considered public data. By selecting "Submit' below, I agree that I am a legal adult 18 years of age or older and understand this permit does not release me of any liability for damages that may result from the conducting of this recreational fire. Further, I agree to comply with all recreational fire requirements listed above. Submit http://www.ci.edina.mn.us/form/L6-03a—FireRecApplication.asp 7/17/2006 MEMORANDUM To: Edina City Council Members From: Steering Committee of the Morningside Neighborhood Association Re: Northeast Edina Transportation Study Draft Report Date: July 16, 2006 The Steering Committee of the Morningside Neighborhood Association ( "MNA") met Sunday, July 9, to discuss the Northeast Edina Transportation Study Draft Report prior to its presentation by the Edina Transportation Commission ("ETC") to the Edina City Council. Copies of the Draft Report and the revised Draft Report had been sent to all Steering Committee members the week of June 26. Steering Committee members expressed concern about several issues, specifically: 1. Cost — The Report fails to identify the costs of the proposed Residential Area Safety Improvements and fails to recommend who should bear those costs. An e-mail from ETC Chair Les Wanninger to the Edina City Council, dated July 3, states that "Residential area safety improvements would be assessed against residents under current Council practice. Staff will prepare a preliminary cost estimate and potential assessments for the Master Plan." and its recommendations. No public comment period should be ined and residents notified by mail. An example of the kind and extent of disclosure needed can be found in the Notice of Public Hearing, dated July 1, 2005, for the hearing before City Council on July 19, 2005, on sewer, water and street reconstruction in the Country Club neighborhood. The Notice stated the estimated total project cost, estimated costs per assessable lot, the work to be included in the estimated assessments, and the addresses of the lots proposed to be assessed. A copy of the Notice is attached. 2. Speed Limits — MNA Steering Committee members brought the issue of residential speed limits to the attention of Edina City Council members and the ETC after they discovered in early February that Edina's Speed Limit Policy conflicted with Minnesota law. Specifically, although Minnesota law empowers a municipality to reduce speed limits on selected segments of residential roadways from 30 miles per hour (State default speed limit) to 25 miles per hour, the Edina Speed Limit Policy stated, "The City of Edina cannot legislate speed limits below 30 MPH." (See House of Representatives Research Comment on Minnesota Speed Limits, copy attached.) The ETC discussed residential speed limits with Sgt. Phil Larsen at its meeting on February 16, 2006. Sgt. Larsen stated that he did not advocate citywide reduction, but that neighborhood and street - specific factors influence the appropriateness of a 30 mph speed limit. At ETC meetings on April 20 and May 18, City staff opposed change in City practice. Commissioners stated their desire for more tools to address speeding on residential streets, resulting in a vote (3-2, with one abstention) to recommend to the City Council that it adopt a revised Speed Limit Policy acknowledging that "Qualifying residential roadway speed limits may be 25 MPH if adopted by the City Council for specific segments of local, residential roadways." The City Council, at its meeting on Jt�e 6, rejected the ETC recommendation. Speeding traffic is a concern throughout northeast Edina. Vehicle speed was measured at 20 locations in the study area. At 12 of these locations, 11 % or more of traffic in a 24- hour period exceeded the 30 mph residential speed limit. At five locations, 20% or more of traffic in a 24 -hour period exceeded 30 mph. These included Grimes Avenue between Sunnyside Road and West 44th Street, 20 %; Grimes Avenue between Golden Years Montessori School and Calvin Christian School (and adjacent to Weber Park), 24 %; Edina Boulevard, 26 %; West 44th Street just east of Brookside Avenue, 33 %; and Sunnyside Road between Grimes and France avenues, 47 %. The speed at which most motorists drive on a roadway indicates its safe high speed. Data collected for this study measured most motorists in the study area driving at speeds lower than 30 mph. 85th percentile speed (the speed under which most (85 %) drivers are traveling) on ten of the 15 streets measured was below 30 mph. Average speed on 11 of the 15 streets was at or below 25 mph. The Minnesota Department of Transportation consumer publication on speed limits states "the speed that the majority of people consider prudent is an important value [in determining] the maximum safe and reasonable speed." A copy of the MnDOT publication "Speed Limit? Here's Your Answer" is attached. The MNa._tapr�n mmittee asks the [` until to reconsider Edina's Speed _Limit Policy to allow for reduced spee limits on residential streets and school and park Reduced speed limits on residential streets combined with enforcement is a valuable tool that should not be excluded from Edina's tool box. 3. Depiction and Characterization of Traffic Volume Data - The Draft Report characterizes traffic volume data in a manner that could mislead residents and create expectations that may not be met by the solutions proposed. The study area contains 40 streets of varying lengths. The Draft Report gives speed data for 15 streets and volume data for 17 streets (fewer than half of the streets). Traffic volumes exceeding 900 vehicles per day were measured on 12 different streets. The Draft Report states (at pages 1, 8, 30) that "Daily traffic volumes on most residential streets within the study area exceed 900 vehicles per day." Actually, daily traffic volumes on fewer than one -third of the residential streets (12 of 40) within the study area were measured as exceeding 900 vehicles per day. 2 In discussing acceptable residential street traffic volume, the Draft Report uses a standard of 900 vehicles per day. The source for this standard is not provided. The Metropolitan Council uses the guideline of less than 1,000 vehicles per day for local streets. (See Functional Classification System Criteria for the Twin Cities Region, Edina Transportation Plan, Figure D-6 and Northeast Edina Transportation Study, Appendix C: Technical Memorandum, Figure 2 (copies attached).) The MNA Steering Committee a rd o se the Metro olita er standard is used, it must be one that can be applied to all of Edina not just the current study area In reporting daily traffic volumes, the Draft Report uses ranges, rather than numbers. Streets carrying just over 900 vehicles are grouped with streets carrying up to 2,000 vehicles per day. So that the Draft Report gives residents an accurate understanding of traffic volumes, actual numbers, not just ranges, should be reported as in past studies. At first glance, the Draft Report may appear to depict concentration of traffic volume because data on speed and volume was collected only on certain streets in the study area (17 of 40, fewer than half). But higher volumes were measured on residential streets located throughout the study area, including two north of West 4e Street for which data was collected and supplied for the study by the City of St. Louis Park. The highest - volume streets measured are: West 44th Street (east of Brookside Avenue) (west of France Avenue) Wooddale Avenue (north of West 441h Street) West 38th Street (Excelsior Blvd to France) Wooddale Avenue (south of West 44th Street) Sunnyside Road (between Grimes and France) Quentin Avenue ( Wooddale to Excelsior) collector 4,674 vehicles per day 3,655 vehicles per day collector 3,165 vehicles per day minor collector 3,103 vehicles per day" local 2,496 vehicles per day local 2,413 vehicles per day minor collector 2,122 vehicles per day* `Data collected and supplied for this study by the City of St. Louis Park, but not reported in Figure 2. - Daily traffic volumes obtained by review of study data in the Engineering Dept. at Edina City Hall. - The Metropolitan Council does not classify streets as residential or non - residential, but as local, collector or arterial. Collector streets in this study area are also residential streets. In discussing the cause(s) of high traffic volumes, the Draft Report does not ask or answer the question: How much traffic is generated by the study area itself? The Draft Report quantifies peak -hour afternoon traffic as 30% "diverting through." A reader can infer that 70% of rash hour traffic is generated by the area itself. The Draft Report characterizes the non- diverted/area- generated peak hour traffic as "very heavy for residential areas" and not "calm or civil." What is the purpose of these characterizations and what data supports them? 3 The Metropolitan Council provides a useful guideline for street function that, if included in the Draft Report, may help balance residents' expectations of who should or should not drive on "their" streets. According to the Metropolitan Council, local streets should carry "short trips (under 2 miles) at low speeds." (See Functional Classification Criteria, copy attached.) Longer trips may begin or end on local streets to connect to collectors or arterials. Metropolitan Council publications state that if local trips are conducted on local streets, the arterials remain less congested and better able to carry the longer, regional trips they are designed to carry. According to the study's measurement of through traffic, someone living at West 40th Street and Upton Avenue near Lake Harriet (one mile from the study area) would be considered to be "diverting through" the study area when traveling local streets home from Highway 100. Similarly, an Edina resident traveling via Wooddale Avenue from West 54th Street to Park Nicollet Medical Center, on Excelsior Boulevard between Wooddale and Quentin avenues (a distance of 2.1 miles), would be considered to be "diverting through" the study area while actually making a local trip. Data about where vehicles "diverting though" began or ended their trips or the reason(s) why motorists "diverted through" could have been gathered by this study had a representative sample of motorists been stopped and asked during the license plate study, or matches made to registered addresses, methods used in studies in other communities. However, this study simply recorded the license plate numbers of vehicles entering and leaving the study area and so has no data on these points. The Draft Report predicts significant reduction in traffic on residential streets if the arterial and intersection improvements it proposes are approved and implemented. The MNA Steering Committee supports the proposed arterial and intersection improvements on the grounds that they will benefit residents and business owners in Edina and adjacent areas of southwest Minneapolis by improving traffic flow, reducing congestion and avoidable crashes, and making the area a more desirable destination. However, lack of data about diverted traffic and the fact that most of the traffic on residential streets in northeast Edina is generated by the area itself creates concern that expectations of significant reduction in traffic on residential streets may not be met. 4. onclusions _,The MNA Steering Committee encourages the Council to approve e arterial and intersection improvements on the basis of their ability to reduce congestion and improve travel conditions and safety, not their predicted ability to reduce residential street volume. It urges the Council to reexamine its position on residential speed limits in order to give the City another tool to address speeding in northeast Edina. Finally, it asks that the Council schedule public comment on the Draft Report only after the costs of residential safety improvements have been determined and residents notified by mail of those costs and who will be responsible for them. MNA Steering Committee Members (* present at July 9 meeting) Paul Balthazor Marian Cracraft Arnold Hymanson Judy Plant* Gene Veit Joni Kelly Bennett* Tim Frederick* Jennifer Janovy* Paul Thompson Mary Carte* Mark Horton* Chris Johns* Mark Valgemae* 4 City of Edina July 1, 2005 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING SEWER, WATER, AND STREET RECONSTRUCTION — PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT NUMBERS A -213 & A -214 - COUNTRY CLUB AREA The Edina City Council will meet at Edina City Hall, on Tuesday, July 19, 2005 at 7:00 PM, to consider the Public Hearing on Sewer, Water, and Street Reconstruction in the Country Club Area. This hearing is being conducted under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. This hearing has been called as a recommendation from staff. Improvement No. A -213 would be constructed during the 2006 construction season. With the exception of sanitary sewer trunk pipe reconstruction along Casco and Drexel Avenues between Country Club Road and Bridge Street, Improvement No. A -214 would be constructed during the 2007 construction season. The sanitary sewer trunk pipe along Casco and Drexel Avenues between Country Club Road and Bridge Street would be reconstructed during the 2006 construction season. The assessment hearing for the entire project would occur in October or November 2006. The estimated total project cost is $13,300,000. The cost of the project will be funded by special assessments and City utility enterprise funds. With the exception of 02 and 03 Edina court, the estimated cost per assessable lot is $12,600 per residential equivalent unit. The estimated cost per assessable lot is $4,200 per residential equivalent unit for 02 and 03 Edina Court. A reasonable estimate of the impact of the assessment will be available at the hearing. The assessment includes the reconstruction of the sanitary sewer seraice pipe befiii/een the trunk pipe Wand the l ight-c, -wc.y lire, street lighting, and street/sidewalk reconstruction. These assessments can be divided over a ten -year period with interest accumulating on the unpaid balance. The area proposed to be assessed the cost of the proposed improvements includes: Improvement A -213 4500 to 4531, 4601 Arden Avenue; 4400 to 4515 Browndale Avenue; 4501 to 4531 Bruce Avenue; 4500 to 4532 Casco Avenue; 4500 to 4527 Drexel Avenue; 4500 to 4519 Edina Boulevard; 4500 to 4517 Moorland Avenue; 4100 to 4920 Sunnyside Road; 4500 to 4523 Wooddale Avenue. City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 Improvement A -214 4600 to 4920 Arden Avenue; 4518 to 4909 Browndale Avenue; 4600 to 4919 Bruce Avenue; 4600 to 4638 Casco Avenue; 4203 to 4409 Country Club Road; 4600 to 4633 Drexel Avenue; 4612 to 4640 Edgebrook Place; 4600 to 4621 Edina Boulevard; 02 to 03 Edina Court; 4600 to 4622 Moorland Avenue; 4600 to 4625 Wooddale Avenue. Your receipt of this notice is an indication that property whose ownership is listed to you is among those properties, which are considered to be benefited by the improvement. Any inquiries, comments and /or suggestions you may have regarding this improvement may be forwarded to the City Council or Engineering Department prior to the hearing or presented at the hearing itself. If you desire additional information, please call Wayne Houle at 952 - 826 -0443 or by email at whoule ci.edina.mn.us. The City Council can authorize the proposed project immediately upon the close of the hearing. Sincerely, a� .100V '00'4" Wayne D. Houle, P.E. Director of Public Works and City Engineer Legislature Home Links to the World I Help I Advanced Search Minnesota House of Representatives House Research House Senate I Joint Departments and Commissions Bill Search and Status Statutes, Laws, and Rules Minnesota Speed Limits • Basic law • Statutory limits • Speed zones • Local authority • Speed violations Minnesota law sets speed limits on state and local highways and streets, and provides for the establishment of speed zones by the Department of Transportation (MnDOT). Basic law Minnesotais basic law on highway speeds is found in Minnesota Statutes, section 169.14, subdivision 1: No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions. t Every driver is responsible for becoming and remaining aware of the actual and potential hazards then existing on the highway and must use due care in operating a vehicle. Statutory limits Minnesota law sets out the following speed limits: 2 Streets and highways in urban areas, 30 m.p.h. 2 Interstate highways outside urbanized areas of 50,000 or more, 70 m.p.h. 2 Interstate highways within urbanized areas of 50,000 or more, 65 m.p.h. 2 Noninterstate freeways and expressways, 65 m.p.h. 7, Other highways outside urban districts, 55 m.p.h 2 Streets inside urban districts, 30 m.p.h 7, Town roads in rural residential districts, 30 m.p.h. E Alleys, 10 m.p.h. An iurban districts is any segment of street or highway that is built up with structures less than 100 feet apart for a distance of a quarter- mile.t A irural residential districti is a segment of a town road with structures less than 300 feet apart for a distance of a quarter -mile. Speed limits within cities are absolute, meaning that any speed in excess of them is automatically illegal.t Elsewhere speed limits are iprima facie limits,i meaning that any speed in excess of them is prima facie evidence that the speed was illegal.t This means that there is a presumption that the excess speed is illegal but the presumption may be rebutted by other evidence. Speed zones MnDOT has the authority to establish speed zones in which the speed limit is higher or lower than the limits set in law.t Speed zones are established after MnDOT conducts an engineering and traffic investigation that includes a segmentis design, physical characteristics, traffic volume, accident history, and actual speeds.t Generally, MnDOT believes that a speed limit at or near the i85th percentile speeds (the speed at or below which 85 percent of vehicles are traveling) is most likely to be the safest maximum limit.t Speed limits in speed zones are effective as soon as signs are erected.t Like statutory limits, they are absolute limits within a city and prima facie limits outside cities. Local authority The authority of a city, county, or town over speed limits is limited, even on its own streets and highways.t A local road authority may ask MnDOT to conduct an engineering and traffic investigation on a segment of local road, but the department makes the final determination on the speed limit on that segment. There are a few exceptions to this general rule: 2 On a residential roadway, defined as a segment up to a half -mile that is functionally classified as local, a local resolution may reduce the speed limit from 30 m.p.h. to 25 m.p.h.t Y, In school zones, defined as a segment of street or highway that abuts school grounds where children have access to the roadway or where a school crossing is established, a local road authority may prescribe a lower speed limit that is not less than 15 m.p.h. or more than 20 m.p.h. below the surrounding limit. Y, On a park road within a local park a local authority may prescribe a lower speed limit that is not less than 15 m.p.h. or more than 20 m.p.h. below the surrounding limit. Both MnDOT and local road authorities can set speed limits within their own highway work zones, to be effective while highway workers are on the job.t A work zone speed limit cannot be less than 20 m.p.h. or reduce the speed limit in the work zone by more than 15 m.p.h. The maximum work zone speed limit is 55 m.p.h. on divided highways and 40 m.p.h. on other highways. Speed violations Under most circumstances, speeding is a petty misdemeanor punishable by a maximum penalty of a $300 fine.t However, if a speeding violation is committed in such a manner as to endanger persons or property, it can be charged as a misdemeanor with maximum penalties of a $1,000 fine and 90 days in jail.t Speeding violations of more than 20 m.p.h. over the legal limit result in a surcharge equal to the amount of the original fine, with a $25 minimum. Minnesota does not have a point system on driveris licenses, but a third petty misdemeanor in a year can be charged as a misdemeanor, and a third misdemeanor in a year can result in a driveris license revocation.t A speed of 100 m.p.h. or more results in at least a six -month license revocation. Under the iDimler amendment,i named after its author, former Rep. Chuck Dimler, a violation of a 55 m.p.h. speed limit by not more than 10 m.p.h., or of a 60 m.p.h. limit by not more than 5 m.p.h., is not recorded on a motoristis driving record. For more informatiowt Contact legislative analyst John Williams at 651 - 296 - 5045.1 January 2006 Return to Transportation Retum to House Research home MN Statute 169.14 Speed laws are created for the protection of the public and the curbing of unreasonable behavior. To effectively enforce a law, the public must believe that the law is reasonable. Minnesota's speed regulations are based on the same Basic Speed Law that is used in all 50 states: "No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions ". Statutory limits are based on the concept that uniform categories of highways can operate safely at certain preset maximum speeds under ideal conditions. Whether the speed limit is posted or umposted, drivers are required to reduce speed below these values for poor weather conditions, curves or hills and potential hazards such as pedestrians. Drivers must also reduce speed when approaching or passing emergency vehicles with emergency lights flashing. These are the most common statutory speeds: 10 mph in alleys 30 mph on streets in urban districts 70 mph on rural interstate highways 65 mph on urban interstate highways 65 mph on expressways 55 mph on other roads Whenever these statutory speed limits are not the correct value for a specific highway, the commissioner of transportation authorizes the posting of other regulatory speed limits. The commissioner of transportation sets regulatory speed limits on state and local roads based on a thorough engineering and traffic investigation. These factors are considered: road type and condition location and type of access points (intersections, entrances, etc.) j sufficient length of roadway (1/4 Hole minimum) i existing traffic control devices (signs, signals, etc.) crash history j traffic volume j sight distances (curve, hill, etc.) test drive results speed study The most important part of the traffic investigation is the speed study. When choosing a speed, drivers take many roadway environment factors into consideration. Therefore, the speed that the majority of people consider prudent is an important value. Data is collected by performing radar checks at selected locations on the roadway under ideal driving conditions. A technical analysis is done on the results to determine the 85th percentile. This is the value indicating the speed at which most (85 %) drivers are traveling under. Experience has shown that a posted speed limit near this value is the maximum safe and reasonable speed. Studies have shown that traveling much faster or slower than this value can increase your chance of being in a crash. Engineering judgement is an important tool. The traffic IntemtateS are high design multilane divided highways investigator must use knowledge of nationally accepted that have controlled access interchanges such as cloverleafs principles combined with experience to assign the safe speed. or diamond shaped interchanges. Through traffic on the interstate never has to stop or yield. Examples: I -94 or! -35 ONES° 4 August 2002 ® il Expressvwry S are multi lane divided highways but they nJ Minnesota Department of Transportation have entries and intersections, sometimes controlled by ? ¢ Office enTraffic Engineering e ms trattie signals. Some interchanges may exist bud they are fti Intelligent Transportation Systems not the rule. Examples: Highway 10 or Highway 52 T oc i arch ', w.dot.state.mn.usltraf iceng C FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM CRITERIA FOR THE TWIN CITIES REGION �oyu„auw�'WWY r'ISn. MR; 18ow F-1 Metropolitan Council FIGURE Functional Classification Criteria D-6 Collector Local Urban Rural Urban Rural Criterion System Mileage Suggested federal limitations: 5- 10 percent Suggested federal limitations: 20- 25 percent Suggested federal limitations: 65- 80 percent Suggested federal limitations: 63- 75 percent Percent of Travel -VMT Suggested federal limitations: 5- 10 percent Suggested federal limitations: 20- 35 percent Suggested federal limitations: 10- 30 percent Suggested federal limitations: 5- 20 percent Intersections Four -way stops and some traffic signals. Local street traffic should be required to stop. As required. As required. Parking Restricted as necessary. Unrestricted. Permitted as necessary. Permitted as necessary. Large Trucks Restricted as necessary. Restricted as necessary. Permitted as necessary. Permitted as necessary. Management Tools q Number of lanes, traffic signal timing, land access management. Land access management. Intersection control, cul-de -sacs, diverters. As necessary. Vehicles Carried 1,000- 15,000 250 -2,500 Less than 1,000 Less than 1,000 Posted Speed Limit 30-40 mph 3545 mph Maximum 30 mph Maximum 30 mph Right-of-Way 60-100 feet 60-100 feet 50 -80 feet 50 -80 feet Transit Accommodations Cross- sections and geometrics designed for use by regular -route buses. None. Normally uses as bus routes only in non- residential areas. None. �oyu„auw�'WWY r'ISn. MR; 18ow F-1 Metropolitan Council FIGURE Functional Classification Criteria D-6 Functional Classification Principal Arterial "A "Minor Arterial "B" Minor Arterial Collector � Less than 900 vehicles /day 900 -2,000 vehicles /day � 2,000- 2,500vehicles /day 3,000 -5,000 vehicles /day � Over 5,000 vehicles /day v v v 0 a Y O O m Interlachen Blvd a ce\S`ot a 0 40th St a a + 0 C °o C J rp O r 42nd St W v E 00 Morningside Rd —Po O O AA'LkN Sunnyside R d 4 d > ¢ > v a c O O W X v CD Q rQ 50th St 16,000+ 8,000 26�pp0 + v a v O 0 54th St POLICY MAP NOTE: Average Daily Traffic Local Street: < 1,000 vehicles /day Collector: 1,000 - 15,000 vehicles /day NORTHEAST EDINA TRANSPORTATION STUDY CONSULTMCGRUUTAW Current Transportation Problems and Issues Technical Memorandum 10,000+ W X X Figure 2 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM CRITERIA FOR THE TWIN CITIES REGION Cri Place Connections Spacing IISystem Connections and Access Spacing* II Trip- Making Service Urban IInterconnect neighborhoods and minor business concentrations within the MUSA. Provide supplementary interconnection of major generators within the metro centers and regional business concentrations. Metro centers and regional business concentrations: 1/8- 1/2 mile Fully developed area: r/ - 3A mile Developing area: '$ -I mile Sometimes to interstate freeways and other principal arterials. To minor arterials, other collectors and local streets. Short trips (1-4 miles depending on development density) at low to moderate speeds. Longer trips accessing the arterial network. Local Mobility vs. Land Access- Equal emphasis on mobility and land access. Direct land access Predominantly to development concentrations. Souros: Metropolitan r unap Traneportatlon P o0ay Plan,188T, Table Fl ' The key objective is stated under "Management" heading in this table. Rural Provide supplementary interconnection among rural growth centers inside the Twin Cities region and comparable places near the Twin Cities region. Permanent Rural and Agricultural Areas : As needed in conjunction with minor arterials, to provide adequate interconnection of places identified in "Place Connections" criterion. In addition, minor collectors should be designated at an average spacing of not less than 4 miles. To minor arterials, other collectors and local streets. Urban Interconnect blocks within residential neighborhoods and land parcels within commercial/ industrial developments. As needed to access land uses. To a few minor arterials. To collectors and other local streets. Short trips (under 2 miles) at low speeds. Longer trips accessing the collector or collector and arterial network. Emphasis on land access, not on mobility. Direct land access predominantly to residential land uses. Metropolitan Council Functional Classification Criteria Local -- �^ Rural As needed to access land uses. To a few minor arterials. To collectors and local roads. Emphasis on land access not on mobility. Direct land access Predominantly to agricultural land uses. FIGURE D -5 6 I c } Courtney Fields Shelter'.Building r m 0, January 19 17, 2006, City Council Meeting Approved'2006 CIP Budget •$450,000 for building replacement. 9$312,000 for field # Planning Stage is Anderson /Johnson & ATSR conducted feasibility study. • Program design input committee: 1.Kathryn Peterson 2.Dave Engler 3.Chip Howard 4. Park & Rec. Staff Program Design Input Committee Recommendations • Bathrooms ADA accessible. • Bathroom access from exterior. • Adequate size concessions stand that meets current health codes. • Serve as weather shelter space. • Eliminate scoring /announcing booth. • Sound system & scorina controlled from v dugouts. Program Design Input Committee Recommendations • Adequate secure &safe storage for concessions product and various equipment. • Adequate maintenance storage area. • Adequate electric service secured from public access. • Operational drinking fountains. • Display case and trophy case. • Bulletin board. • Safety netting to protect the public from errant baseballs. Lobby Storage Mezzanine and ships ladder Feasibility Study Summary • Building lacks square footage to meet the needs of the shelter space, especially storage and concessions. • The roof system &mezzanine space have a very short life left and should be removed &replaced. • The toilets should be made ADA accessible. • Access to mezzanine via the ships ladder is unsafe. • Concessions stand needs to be reworked to be more efficient and meet current health codes. • Existing masonry wall could remain if they enhance planning for an updated facility. Feasibility Study Recommendations • - Remove existing roof structure. • Maintain existing exterior walls, plumbing walls, electrical walls, footings and foundations. • Remove interior partitions to provide for ADA accessible toilets, electrical room and storage needs. • Relocate restroom access to the exterior for use during hours the shelter is not open.._ • Provide new roof structure with second story storage but eliminate upper level scoring /announcing booth. • If affordable, add patio space for grilling & garnering space. Design Approach — New Facility Maintain exterior and utility walls .-Additional concession space - crease storage E a nm rum lim w t.-W FIRST LEVEL PLAN, ux - Create outdoor patio - Create observation deck . ADA accessible toilets nm � k SECOND. LEVEL,PLAN s ROOF PLAN w - Create outdoor patio - Create observation deck . ADA accessible toilets nm � k SECOND. LEVEL,PLAN s ROOF PLAN ;sign Approach — New Facility asic Roof over main structure ccent Roof over concession and deck arrel Roof — Vocabulary of ice arena - Image from upper lot - Good Site lines from observation deck jam 0"Alwo Cw 0M %M 0"AnEw NORTH ELEVATION EAST AND WEST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATI Estimated Costs City of Edina Preliminary Project Cost Estimate Courtney Field Shelter Building Addition and Alterations Remove exiting roof structure, maintain existing exterior walls, plumbing walls and electrical panel wall Remodeling includes ADA accessible toilet rooms, shelter space, and storage. Addition includes first floor concessions, second floor storage and exterior observation deck. Cost per Estimate Square Feet Square Foot Demo roof structure 1,150 $ 15.00 17,250 Remodel existing shell 1,150 $ 125.00 143,750 New roof and second floor 1,150 $ 75.00 86,250 Addition 300 $ 250.00 75,000 Deck with partial roof above 400 $ 50.00 20,000 Patio 600 $ 8.00 4,800 Site Restorations 20,000 20,000 Estimated bid date Spring 2006 Costs Jan 2006 10% per year 9,176 Occupy May -07 Design contingency 10% 37,623 Construction Subtotal Cost 413,849 Estimated Costs Courtney Field Shelter Building New Building Demo existing building 1500 SF New construction Demo Existing building New Construction first floor New Construction second floor Deck with partial roof above Patio Site Restorations Estimated bid date Spring 2006 Occupy Design contingency 400 $ 50.00 600 $ 8.00 20,000 Costs Jan 2006 10% per year May -07 10% Construction Subtotal Cost 20,000 4,800 20,000 13,514 55,406 609,470 Cost per Estimate Square Feet Square Foot 1,150 $ 30.00 34,500 1,500 $ 250.00 375,000 1,150 $ 75.00 86,250 400 $ 50.00 600 $ 8.00 20,000 Costs Jan 2006 10% per year May -07 10% Construction Subtotal Cost 20,000 4,800 20,000 13,514 55,406 609,470 Preliminary Total Construction Cost Estimates • Original building estimate $413,849 • Expanded concessions area 25,000 • Concession cabinetry/island 5,000 • Low maintenance concrete block 4,000 • Ceramic tile walls (low maint.) 4,000 • Quarry tile floor in lobby 4,200 • Safety netting (previously not incl.)12,000 • Field #4 renovation 250,000 TOTAL ESTIMATE $726,049 Bids Opened on June 28, 2006 Three Bids Received Contractor: Base Bid: Alternate #1 (utilities) Alternate #2 (plaza) Rachel Contracting $809,963 18,500 5,400 Alternate #3 (quarry tile) 4,200 Bids Opened on June 28, 2006 Three Bids Received Contractor: Meisi-nger Construction Base Bid: $855,000 Alternate #1 (utilities) Alternate #2 (plaza) Alternate #3 (quarry tile) 32,800 6,000 5,300 Bids Opened on June 28, 2006 Three Bids Received Contractor: CM Construction Base Bid: $894,800 Alternate #1 (utilities) 32,000 Alternate #2 (plaza) 6,000 Alternate #3 (quarry tile) 6,000 Staff &Consultant Recommend Alternate #1 • Alternate #1 includes installation of sanitary sewer and water lines from shelter building to outside of field #4 to future maintenance garage building. • Maintenance garage replacement is a proposed 2007 CIP project. • Rachel Construction alternate #1 bid is $18,500. Bid Results With. Alternate #1 Rachel Contracting Meisinger Construction CM Construction lee 0 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS Rachel Contracting Base Bid Alternate #1 (utilities) Soft Costs Seeding Contractor TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $809,963 18,500 70,544 6,000 $905,007 VALUE ENGINEERING Revise steel trusses to wood Omit frost foundation at dugout Use concrete masonry units that require epoxy paint Use standard prime paint for structural steel members Use standard prime paint on exterior stairs Electrical modification Omit east canopy TOTAL REDUCTIONS $22,500 7,100 12,000 1,190 2,100 1 24,400 $70,140 Delay Other 2006 CIP Projects Renovate Chowen Park Picnic Shelter Upgrade Keyless Entry System Renovate Key /Core Security System France Avenue Off -leash Dog Area TOTAL $15,000 20,000 14,000 30,000 $79,000 BUDGET i ocai erojecc i,osis ayuo,uvi 2006. CIP. Budget Building $4505000 2006 CIP Budget Field 31:29000 Value Engineering. Reductions- 70,140 Delay 200&-C[P Projects 79,000 TOTAL $911,140 rivc MIKM ■7N, fimill A ,1 J 4 f , sit4s r= ^ WY f e Recommendation •Staff and consultants recommend award of bid to Rachel Contracting for $828,463 which includes base bid and alternate #1. J - - - --- ---------