HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-07-18_COUNCIL MEETINGAGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
JULY 18, 2006
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the
Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All
agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are
considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion
of such items unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it. In such cases
the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its ngrmal sequence on
the Agenda.
* I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of July 5, 2006
* II. CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID - As per pre -list dated July 12, 2006, TOTAL
$ 6,243.11.
III. ADJOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
* I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of July 5, 2006 and Special Meeting
of July 5, 2006
II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Zoning
Ordinances: First Reading requires affirmative rollcall votes of three Council members
except that a rezoning from residential to non - residential requires four affirmative
votes. Second Reading requires affirmative rollcall votes of three of Council to pass
except rezoning from residential to non - residential requires four affirmative votes.
Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall votes of four members of Council to
pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District:
Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council members required passing. Conditional Use
Permit: Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council members required to pass. Variance
Appeal: Favorable rollcall of Council Members present to uphold or deny appeal
Rollcall A. PUBLIC HEARING FINAL REZONING, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, FINAL
DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN, Edina Gateway, LLC, 4930 West 77th Street
call B. PUBLIC HEARING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, St. Patrick's Catholic Church,
6820 St. Patrick's Lane
Agenda /Edina City Council
July 18, 2006
Page 2
III. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
IV. AWARD OF BID
A. Courtney Field Shelter Building and Baseball Field
V. REPORTS/ RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Resolution No. 2006 -72 Accepting Various Donations
B. SET HEARING DATE (8/1/06) New Intoxicating Liquor License, Edina Grill
C. Bikeway Task Force Report
D. Above Ground Swimming Pool Report
E. Traffic Safety of July 6, 2006
F. North East Edina Traffic Study
VI. FINANCE
A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per Pre -List dated July 6,
2006, TOTAL: $600,702.56, and July 12, 2006, TOTAL: $517,351.19.
VII. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS
VIII. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
IX. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
X. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEM
Tues
Aug 1
Tues
Aug 1
Tues
Aug 15
Tues
Aug 29
Mon
Sept 4
Tues
Sept 5
Tues
Sept 12
Tues
Sept. 12
Tues
Sept 19
Tues
Oct 3
Tues
Oct 17
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
Budget Hearing
5:00 P.M.
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
Filing Opens - City Council Offices
8:00 A.M.
LABOR DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Offices Closed
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
FILING CLOSES City Council Office
5:00 P.M.
PRIMARY ELECTION DAY - Polls Open From 7:00 A.M. until 8:00 P.M.
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
COUNCIL CHAMP
CITY CLERK'S OFI�.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MINUTES
OF THE
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
HELD AT CITY HALL
JULY 5, 2006
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Housh, Hulbert, Masica, and Chair
Hovland.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Housh and
seconded by Commissioner Hulbert approving the Consent Agenda for the Edina Housing
and Redevelopment Authority as presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Hovland
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR JUNE 20, 2006, APPROVED Motion made by
Commissioner Housh and seconded by Commissioner Hulbert approving the Minutes of
the Regular Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for June 20,
2006, as presented.
Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes.
There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda,
Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned.
Executive Director
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #
13953 711312006 100668 URS CORPORATION
6,243.11 CENT LAKES PATH/TRANSIT SYS
6,243.11
6,243.11 Grand Total
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
7/13/2006 — 7/13/2006
Doc No Inv No Account No
140118 2360696 9132.6103
Subledger Account Description
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Payment Instrument Totals
Check Total 6,243.11
Total Payments 6,243.11
7/12/2006 10:17:33
Page- 1
- Business Unit
CENTENNIAL LAKE TAX DISTRICT
R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/12/2006 10:17:36
Council Check Summary Page - 1
7/13/2006 - 7/13/2006
Company
09000 HRA FUND
Amount
6,243.11
Report Totals 6,243.11
We confirm to the best of our knOlWedse
and belief, that these claims
comply in all material respeCts
with the requirements of the City
Of Edina purchasing pglicles and
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT CITY HALL
JULY 5, 2006
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Housh, Hulbert, Masica, and Mayor Hovland.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by
Member Hulbert approving the Council Consent Agenda as presented with the exception of
Agenda Item I. Approval of Minutes of the Regular Meeting of June 20, 2006, for a correction
and Agenda Item II.A.2, Conditional Use Permit, St. Patrick's Church, 6820 St. Patrick's Lane,
and Agenda Item V.D. Amend Existing Emergency Preparedness Contract with Bloomington.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Hovland
Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -69 OF APPRECIATION ACCEPTING DAVID BYRON FAMILY
DONATION Mayor Hovland welcomed and thanked the Byron family members for the
contribution given in David's memory to the Edina Fire Department. He noted David's unselfish,
dedicated service as a volunteer in the City of Edina and that the donations would be used by the
Fire Department for the purchase of a thermal imaging camera.
Mayor Hovland and.the Council, in joint acclimation, introduced and moved adoption of the
following Resolution of Appreciation:
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-69
RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION
Whereas, David Byron served his fellow citizens on the City of Edina's Planning
Commission since his appointment in 1990 and was the Chair at the time of his death on
February 14, 2006; and
Whereas, David Byron gave generously of his time and talent to enhance the quality of
life in Edina; and
Whereas, David Byron's skill and intellect served to guide sound decisions on the use
of land in Edina, and
Whereas, the David Byron Family decided to dedicate all memorials in David's honor
to the Edina Fire Department, and
Whereas, the Edina Fire Department will use the David Byron Memorials to purchase a
thermal imaging camera to reduce the prospect of death or injuries to victims of fires and
firefighters.
Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved that the Edina City Council does hereby express its
appreciation on behalf of all Edina citizens to the
DAVID BYRON FAMILY
for his unselfish and dedicated service as a volunteer in the City of Edina and their generous
gift to the Edina Fire Department of a thermal imaging camera; and
Be It Further Resolved, that this resolution be entered in the minutes of the Edina City
Council and that an appropriate copy be presented to his family.
Adopted this 5th day of July 2006.
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Hovland
Motion carried.
Page 1
Minutes/Edina City Council/iuly 5, 2006
1.
RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -74 OF APPRECIATION ACCEPTING EDINA GARDEN COUNCIL
AND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION DONATION Mayor Hovland thanked the Edina Garden
Council and the Community Foundation for the donation of the fountain at Arneson Acres Park.
Director Keprios thanked the Garden Council and especially Dianne Plunkett Latham for
spearheading the effort, Sue Neuhart, President of the Garden Council and Dick Crockett,
Director of the Community Foundation.
Member Masica introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-74
WHEREAS, the Edina Garden Council has presented flower shows and garden tours,
planted public flower beds, educated the public and joined in civic events for the betterment
of Edina for 53 years; and
WHEREAS, the Edina Garden Council has worked closely with the City of Edina and
been generous in its support to municipal programs and facilities, donating such things as a
gazebo and fountain at Arneson Acres Park, and
WHEREAS, the Edina Garden Council determined that the 1998 fountain at Arneson
Acres Park should be replaced and worked with the Edina Community Foundation to raise
$51,138 for a new structure, and
WHEREAS, the new classical three -tiered fountain has been installed in a 20 -foot
reinforced concrete pool and will be more durable and tamper- resistant than the old structure;
and
WHEREAS, the fountain will be dedicated 10 A.m. Saturday, Aug. 5, during the Edina
Garden Council's biennial garden tour.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council, City staff and all
Edina residents hereby express their thanks and appreciation to the
EDINA GARDEN COUNCIL & EDINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
for their work to beautify and improve Arneson Acres Park and the City of Edina.
Dated this 5th day of July 2006. Member Housh seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Hovland
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF TUNE 20, 2006, APPROVED Motion made by
Member Housh and seconded by Member Hulbert approving the Minutes of the Special
Council Meeting of June 20, 2006, as presented.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL FOR TUNE 20,
2006, APPROVED AS CORRECTED Member Masica asked that the Minutes of the Regular
Meeting of the Edina City Council for June 20, 2006, be removed from the Consent Agenda for a
spelling correction.
Member Masica made a motion approving the Minutes of the Edina City Council for June 20,
2006, as corrected. Member Housh seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Hovland
Motion carried.
Page 2
Minutes/Edina Citv Council/luly 5.2006
*HEARING DATE SET OF JULY 18, 2006, FOR PLANNING MATTERS Motion made by
Member Housh and seconded by Member Hulbert approving setting a hearing date of July 18,
2006, for a planning matter, as follows:
1. Final Rezoning, Conditional Use Permit, Final Development Plan and Amendment to
the Comprehensive Plan, Edina Gateway, LLC, 4930 West 77th Street.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
HEARING DATE SET OF JULY 18, 2006, FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ST.
PATRICK'S CATHOLIC CHURCH (6820 ST. PATRICK'S LANE) Member Masica asked that
the hearing date of July 18, 2006, for Conditional Use Permit for St. Patrick's Catholic Church at
6820 St. Patrick's Lane, be removed from the Consent Agenda for additional information. She
inquired about the size, makeup and placement of the sign for the Conditional Use Permit and
asked if homemade signs were permitted. Manager Hughes said the City has specifications for
signage and historically pigns have been done professionally. Mr. Hughes said the City requested
St. Patrick's signs be removed and replaced with conforming signage prior to the hearing.
Member Masica asked if the specifications state where the signs must be placed on the site. Mr.
Hughes elaborated that "one sign was required for each street front with a specific setback
requirement.
Member Masica made a motion setting the hearing date of July 18, 2006, for Conditional Use
Permit for St. Patrick's Catholic Church at 6820 St. Patrick's Lane. Member Housh seconded the
motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Hovland
Motion carried. --
CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS Flora Delaney, 5916 Bernard Place, reported she received a letter
dated June 30, 2006, from the City Health Department stating she was in violation of the City
Ordinance 450.01 prohibiting above - ground swimming pools with a water depth of over 24
inches. Ms. Delaney stated after researching the issue, surrounding cities regulations allow
above - ground pools such as she has in her yard. She stated she felt it important to allow her
children an active summer activity. Ms. Delaney argued that with today's changed technology,
an above - ground pool should be allowed. She suggested Edina study its existing Ordinance for
above - ground pools. Ms. Delaney also asked to be allowed to leave her pool in place until after
the Council reviewed the ordinance. '
Mr. Hughes said a report could be back before the Council by the July 18, 2006, regular meeting.
The Council denied Ms. Delaney's request to keep the pool in place. The Council suggested
review of the existing Ordinance include a comparison of the existing policy of surrounding
communities.
*AWARD OF BID FOR MILLING MACHINE AND PAVER WITH OPERATORS - MILL
AND OVERLAY PROJECTS - PUBLIC WORKS Motion made by Member Housh and
seconded by Member Hulbert for award of bid for a milling machine and paver with operators
for mill and overlay projects for Public Works to recommended low bidder Bituminous
Roadways, Inc., at $24,721.17.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
Page 3
Minutes/Edina City Council/luly 5, 2006
*AWARD OF BID FOR TREATED SALT FOR SNOW AND ICE CONTROL Motion made by
Member Housh and seconded by Member Hulbert for award of bid for treated salt for snow
and ice control to sole bidder, Cargill, Inc., under State Contract #436254 at $60.65 per ton
delivered.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
*AWARD OF BID FOR SINGLE AXLE TRUCK CHASSIS - STREET DEPARTMENT Motion
made ,by Member Housh and seconded by Member Hulbert for award of bid for one single
axle truck chassis for the Street Department Unit No. 25.309, to recommended sole bidder
Boyer Trucks, Inc., under State Contract #435523, at $62,745.54.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
*AWARD OF BID FOR TRALEE WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -458 Motion made
by Member Housh and seconded by Member Hulbert for award of bid for Tralee Water Main
Improvement No. WM -458 to recommended low bidder, Castrejon, Inc., at $31,800.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
EDINA'S COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT (CAFR) FOR YEAR ENDING
DECEMBER 31, 2005, RECEIVED Director Wallin introduced James Eichten, CPA, partner with
Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Company, (MMKR) the City's Audit firm. Mr.
Eichten briefly informed the Council of the unqualified opinion his firm had given the City of
Edina in completing their Comprehensive Annual Financial Statement for the year ending
December 31, 2005. He further explained that the Auditor's role in completing the Annual Report
was an opinion on assuring the Financial Statements were fairly presented in accordance with the
GAAP. Mr. Eichten elaborated that the testing of internal controls and compliance included:
Financial Statement Audit; Schedule of Federal Awards; and State Statutes.
Mr. Eichten complimented staff on their audit preparations and their precise internal control
policies, financial records and procedures. He summarized the process and gave projections for
the future:
• Clean Opinion on Financial Statement
• Clean Opinion on Schedule of Federal Awards
• No Findings on Compliance with State Laws
• Continue to Improve Internal Controls
• Financial Results Indicate Adherence to Budget
• Excellent Financial Condition and
• Continue Ongoing Assessment of Financial Projections and Results
Mr. Eichten thanked the Council for the time to review the report and commended the City for
obtaining an unqualified result of their 2005 CAFR.
Member Housh made a motion accepting Edina's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
(CAFR) for Year Ending December 31, 2005, as presented. Member Hulbert seconded the
motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Hovland
Motion carried.
Page 4
Minutes/Edina City Council/July 5, 2006
RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -71 - ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland
explained in order to comply with State Statues, all donations to the City must be adopted by
Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations.
Member Masica introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-71
ACCEPTING DONATIONS
ON BEHALF OF THE
CITY OF EDINA
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of
real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens;
WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by
a two thirds majority of its members.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with
sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens.
Donations to the Braemar Memorial Fund for future Golf Course equipment purchases:
Duane Blake $50.00
State Farm Companies $500.00
D W Steinkamp
$30.00
Ivan Roberson
$30.00
Daniel Geske
$15.00
Midwest Investment Advisors
$15.00
Donations to the Edina Art Center:
Sarah M. Hall
$200.00
Gene F. Gaines
$10.00
John A. Telfer, Misc. art supplies
$75.00
Sarah Delaney, Collector pots
$1,360.00
Donation to Edina Senior Center:
Edina Community Foundation
$2,274.90
Defibrillator including supplies
And Mounting Case
Dated: July 5, 2006. Member Hulbert seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Hovland
Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -70 - APPROVING GOVERNOR'S "FIT CITY" PROGRAM FOR
EDINA Tolu Oyelowo, Community Health Committee Chair, indicated the purpose of the
Governor's "Fit City" Program would be recognizing Minnesota cities committed to creating and
maintaining an environment supportive of active living. Any city could be designated a "Fit
City" that encouraged its residents to be more physically active. Cities that were designated as a
Governor's "Fit City" will receive a recognition plaque to be displayed within.the city.
Required criteria:
• Adopt a resolution affirming activity- friendly commitments by City leaders and elected
officials
• Agree to advertise and display "Fit City" designation
Optional criteria:
• Worksite wellness policy for city employees
.Page 5
Minutes/Edina City Council/Tuly 5, 2006
• Capacity -to measure and report change in physical activity awareness to maintain "Fit
City" designation
• Maintain/ develop walkability capacity and locations accessible for walking
• Maintain/ develop one accessible indoor facility, public or private for indoor activities
• Maintain/ develop recreation areas, parks, playgrounds and playfields
• Partner with community -wide organizations dedicated to activities that support physical
activity
• Promote/ sponsor annual event/ activity as commitment to fitness
• Commit to building community awareness about locations, services and organizations
dedicated to fitness/ physical activity.
Member Hulbert introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-70
AFFIRMING ACTIVITY - FRIENDLY COMMITMENTS
WHEREAS, the first criteria listed on the Governor's "Fit City" Application is stated as:
Criteria 1 (required). City must adopt a Resolution affirming fit - friendly
commitments by community leaders and elected officials.
WHEREAS, Active Living is a way of life that integrates physical activity into daily
routines. The goal is to accumulate at least 30 minutes of activity each day. Individuals may
do this in a variety of ways such as walking or bicycling for transportation, exercise or
pleasure; playing in the park; working in the yard; taking the stairs; and using recreation
facilities; and
WHEREAS, the City of Edina has adopted a tobacco -free policy because we believe that
tobacco use in park areas is detrimental to the health of everyone using the park system and
that creating a tobacco -free recreational environment supports the purpose of our park system,
which is to promote health and wellness.
WHEREAS, the City of Edina affirms activity- friendly commitments such as:
Adopt a Resolution to designate the City of Edina as a Governor's "Fit City".
Agree to advertise and display "Fit City" designation in the form of a plaque.
City maintains and develops walkability capacity and locations that are easily accessed
by residents, workers and visitors.
City commits to maintain and develop. recreation areas, parks, playgrounds and play
fields.
City commits to maintain at least one indoor facility - public or private - available for
cold season activity that is open and accessible to all ages.
Supports recreation programs that encourage active living.
City partners with community-wide organizations dedicated to specific or general
activities which support physical activity.
City promotes or sponsors at least one event or activity as part of the city's annual
commitment to fitness.
City commits to building community awareness about locations, services, and
organizations dedicated to fitness /physical activity
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Edina is committed to
providing an activity- friendly community to its residents.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby authorizes the application
for The Governor's "Fit City" Program. Member Masica seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Hovland
Motion carried.
Page 6
Minutes/Edina City Council/iuly 5, 2006
EXISTING EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS CONTRACT WITH BLOOMINGTON
AMENDED Member Hulbert asked that the existing emergency preparedness contract with
Bloomington amendment be removed from the Consent Agenda for further information. She
inquired what preparedness has been accomplished and who was monitoring the expenditure of
funding. Sanitarian Engelman explained prior to her working at the City of Edina, an emergency
preparedness coordinator for public health was hired in ,conjunction with Bloomington and
Richfield. Ms. Hulbert asked what the funds were used for. Ms. Engelman said funds were used
for planning activities regarding emergency preparedness and she suggested inviting that person
to give a presentation before the Council at some point in the future.
Ms. Engelman gave a brief history of the planning that has been and will be undertaken for
preparedness in Edina. She reminded the Council that updates would be provided in the Council
packets on a regular basis.
Mr. Hughes suggested additional information could be shared with the Council at a regular
meeting in August keeping in mind that staying abreast of information with the State would be
of paramount importance.
Following a Council discussion, Member Hulbert made a motion approving the amendment to
the 2006 Public Health Preparedness Agreement with the City of Bloomington for an
additional $12,758.00 including $8,758.00 for additional Cities Readiness Initiative (CRI) and
$4,000.00 for Pandemic Flu. Member Masica seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Hovland
Motion carried.
TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REPORT FOR TUNE 8, 2006, CONTINUED FROM TUNE 20, 2006,
APPROVED Mr. Hughes explained that the Traffic Safety Staff Report for June 8, 2006, was
continued from the June 20, 2006, regular Council meeting. Steve Lillehaug, Assistant City
Engineer, recommended a single motion of approval for Section A. 1, 3, and 4, Section B. 1 and
Section C.
Member Housh made a motion approving the Traffic Safety Staff Report for June 8, 2006,
Section A., 1, 3 and 4, Section B.1 and Section C as presented. Member Hulbert seconded the
motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Hovland
Motion carried.
Mr. Lillehaug indicated that the Traffic Safety Committee recommended in Section A.2, that NO
PARKING ANYTIME signs be erected on the north /west side of School Road from the Concord
School parking lot west and south to West 60th Street. He elaborated that a request was received
from the Fire Marshal stating it was extremely difficult for emergency vehicles to navigate and
operate along School Road during school events due to the narrow width when vehicles park on
both sides of the roadway. Mr. Lillehaug stated School Road was 24 feet wide with curb / gutter
and no sidewalks. No vehicle or pedestrian accidents have been reported in the past five years.
Currently, the parking restrictions in place were, "No PARKING ANYTIME" signs on the north
side of School Road from Concord running west to the parking lot of Concord School. "NO
PARKING SCHOOL DAYS" on the south side of School Road from Concord Avenue running
west to 4729 School Road. Parking currently was allowed on both sides of the street west of the
Page 7
Minutes/Edina City Council/iuly 5, 2006
parking lot and south to West 60th Street. The Fire Marshal was requesting continuing the "NO
PARKING ANYTIME" restrictions on School Road, on the north /west side only, from the
Concord School parking lot west and south around the curve to West 60th Street to make the
street more accessible to emergency vehicles.
Mr. Lillehaug said when the Committee considers parking restrictions, a balance of safety and
inconvenience was examined as well as alternatives to parking. The alternative would be to allow
parking on the opposite side of the street. The Committee was asking the Council to consider
approving this recommendation.
Karen Miller, 4804 School Road, and Lila Larson, 4800 School Road, speaking for the
neighborhood said that the recommendation seemed aggressive because the school was empty
for three months. She noted that a problem with parking existed sporadically. Ms. Miller said the
problem seemed to be parking on the curve going east /west to the north. Ms. Larson asked that
the signs not be installed so visitors to the neighborhood would have a place to park.
Member Masica asked for clarification of what the neighborhood wanted. Ms. Miller restated
their fear that NO PARKING ANYTIME signs would keep visitors from parking in their
neighborhood all year long. Ms. Miller said while she understands the concern of the Fire
Marshal, she suggested just signing the turn.
Mr. Lillehaug again said a balance must be found and the neighborhood suggestion might be that
balance. He suggested the Council refer the issue back to the Traffic Safety Committee for further
study.
Chief Scheerer indicated putting NO PARKING signs on the north side of the curve where the
road narrows down to 24 feet would be a good balance for emergency purposes and the
neighborhood.
Member Masica made a motion referring Section A.2., recommending NO PARKING
ANYTIME signs placed on the northwest side of School Road from the Concord School
parking lot west and south to West 60th Street back to the Traffic Safety Committee for further
consideration of placing NO PARKING signs on the north side of the curve where the road
narrows to 24 feet in width. Member Housh seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Hovland
Motion carried.
BIKE TASK FORCE FORMATION CONSIDERED Mayor Hovland said at the June 20, 2006,
meeting, the Council asked this matter be placed on the July 5, 2006, Agenda for discussion.
Mr. Hughes said the Council may choose how they wish the flow of information to happen,
whether it be establishing an appointed Task Force that would report back to the Council or a
sub -set of the Transportation Commission.
Steve Rusk, 5040 Hankerson Avenue, asked what the purpose of the Bikeway Task Force was and
would it be just for the Interlachen /Blake Trail or included in the Comprehensive Plan. He
suggested formation of a Task Force that would report directly to the Council initially and could
Page 8
Minutes/Edina City Counciouly 5, 2006
be then be tied more with the Traffic Commission. Mr. Rusk added the first thing the Task Force
should work on would be the Blake /Interlachen Trail to assure funding would remain in place.
Member Masica said it appeared that. Mr. Rusk had done an inordinate amount of thinking and
planning about formation of a Task Force and she inquired if he would Chair the Bikeway Task
Force.
Leanne Gustafson, 1 Cooper Avenue, said she wanted to read something to the Council that
would give validity for formation of a Task Force. She said the following persons agreed with a
Blake /Interlachen bike trail with 67 crossings the design was unsafe: Bill Carlson - Three Rivers
Park District; Dell Miller - Intergovernmental Relations Administrator; Jim Dustrud - MnDOT;
and Darryl Anderson, Mary Elizabeth Jackson, Steve Clark - Transit for Livable Communities.
Gene Persha, 6917 Cornelia Drive, spoke to the memo he furnished to the Council. He
encouraged the Council to allow interested bicyclists input before the bikeway path plans were
drawn up. Mr. Persha reiterated that he would not favor the Task Force being a part of the
Transportation Commission. He suggested the Task Force be made up of broad -based citizen
participation to determine the direction they want to pursue.
Mayor Hovland suggested formation of a Bikeway Task Force appointed by the Council to
develop a comprehensive bike plan for the City, assisted by staff. In the future a bikeway
advisory group could function as a part of the Transportation Commission.
Member Housh indicated interested residents could apply to serve on the Task Force and added
time was of the essence to assure funds remained available.
Member Masica said she liked the list of residents proposed by , Mr. Rusk and suggested
representatives of each quadrant of the City be included on the Task Force.
Mayor Hovland said chances of acquiring a representative from MnDOT or from Transit for
Livable Communities to serve on a Task Force would be a remote possibility. Mr. Rusk added the
experts would only work with the Task Force on an advisory capacity.
Mr. Hughes reiterated his concern with staff involvement in the process and suggested staff bring
to the next Council meeting a recommendation of a possible consultant.
Following a Council discussion, Member Hulbert made a motion approving establishing a
Bikeway Task Force, Chaired by Steve Rusk to serve at the pleasure of the Council and to
accomplish a Comprehensive Bicycle Plan, and to consist of interested members who may
apply to serve. Mr. Rusk's report to be reviewed by Council on July 18, 2006, with the mission
and membership process. Member Masica seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Hovland
Motion carried.
*RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -73 AUTHORIZING SIGNAL AGREEMENT WITH MnDOT -
WEST 70TH STREET AND HIGHWAY 100 Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by
Member Hulbert approving the following resolution:
RESOLUTION NO.2006 -73
AUTHORIZING SIGNAL AGREEMENT WITH MNDOT FOR
Page 9
Minutes/Edina City Council/iuly 5, 2006
WEST 70TH STREET AND HIGHWAY 100
WHEREAS, the City of Edina entered into an agreement with the State of Minnesota,
Department of Transportation for the following purposes, to wit:
To remove the existing Traffic Control Signals. and install new Traffic
Control Signals with Street Lights, Emergency Vehicle Pre - emption and
Signing on Trunk Highway No. 100 at .70th Street, West and East Ramps;
install a new Traffic Control Signal with Street Lights, Emergency Vehicle
Pre- emption and Signing on 701h Street at Metro Boulevard; and install
Interconnect on 701h Street from Trunk Highway No. 100 West Ramps to
Metro Boulevard; in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth and
contained in Agreement No. 89628R, a copy of which was before the,
Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the proper City officers be and hereby are
authorized to execute such agreement and any amendments, and thereby assume for and on
behalf of the City all of the contractual obligations contained therein.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
*CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Member Housh made a motion and Member Hulbert
seconded the motion approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the
Check Register dated June 21, 2006, and consisting of .32 pages: General Fund $65,962.32;
Communications Fund' $11,369.82; Working Capital Fund $77,954.95; Construction Fund
$61,923.94; Art Center Fund $793.25; Aquatic Center Fund $6,577.07; Golf Course..Fund
$65,561.07; Ice Arena Fund $1,916.91; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $8,738.25; Liquor
Fund $197,705.99; Utility Fund $1,006,946.97; Storm Sewer Fund $71,422.81; PSTF Fund $668.57;
TOTAL $1,577,541.92; and for approval of payment of claims dated June 28, 2006„ and
consisting of 36 pages: General Fund $271,765.30; Communications Fund $23,895.35; Working
Capital Fund $39,929.89; Construction Fund $927.00; Art Center Fund $21,212.06; Golf Dome
Fund $1,818.53; Aquatic Center Fund $24,171.00; Golf Course Fund $39,120.43, Ice Arena Fund
$1,321.00; Edinborough/ Centennial Lakes Fund $4,755.36; Liquor Fund $163,145.25; Utility
Fund $28,971.13; Storm Sewer Fund $2,410.87, PSTF Agency Fund $917.45; TOTAL $624,360.62.
Motion carried on rollcall vote four ayes.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting
adjourned at 9:55 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Page 10
City Clerk '
MINUTES
OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT
EDINA FIRE STATION #1
JULY 5, 2006
5:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Housh, Hulbert, Masica, and Mayor Hovland.
Mayor Hovland said the purpose of the special work session was to tour the Edina Fire Station
and receive information about potential remodeling of the Station.
Following a tour of the Station, Gary Hay, Architect said Station #1 was located ideally within
the City of Edina because of its proximity to Highway 62. However, the Station was built in
1972 and was designed to serve a department that answered fire calls. He pointed out the
Edina Fire Department has developed an emergency medical service that responds to
numerous calls daily. Mr. Hay explained 70% of calls received by the Fire Department were
actually EMS calls where someone was actually transported for service. He continued stating
that of the remaining calls 30% were for fires and but only. 30% of the fire calls were real
incidents, with the remaining being false alarms not needing service.
Mr. Hay said there were many deficiencies in the existing station for medical response teams.
He pointed out the fire fighting work force has changed over time and Edina has just hired
their first woman paramedic/ firefighter. The living spaces need to be remodeled to
accommodate female paramedic/ firefighters.
Mr. Hay presented his proposal for Fire Station #1. He showed a comparison of the existing
areas and a proposed remodeling of the station within the existing structure, and a partial
demolition/ rebuild of the station. Mr. Hay also presented some preliminary program
adjacencies of each alternative.
The Council discussed with Mr. Hay, Chief Scheerer and Manager Hughes the various
components which should be addressed in any remodeling of the fire station. They discussed
the challenges of modeling, partial demolition/ reconstruction and a total demolition
reconstruction, financing of any project, and the time line that would be followed. Consensus
was that Mr. Hay should continue working on a concept design to be brought before Council at
a regular meeting.
Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra Mangen, City Clerk
d e
�yo
less REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
Mayor & City Council
Agenda Item: II. A.
From:
Dan Cornejo
Consent ❑
Interim City Planner
Information Only ❑
Date:
July 18, 2006
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
®
To Council
Subject:
Action: ❑
Motion
Final Rezoning, Final Dev Plan
®
Resolution
Conditional Use Permit, and
❑
Ordinance
Amendment to the Comp Plan
❑
Discussion
Edina Gateway, LLC, 4930 77
Recommendation:
At their June 28, 2006, Planning Commission meeting the Planning Commission
recommended Final Rezoning, Conditional Use Permit, Final Development Plan, and
Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan approval for Edina Gateway, LLC, 4930 77th
Street West subject to:
1. Setback variances from Highway 100 and West 77th Street, with final site
plan adjustments regarding parking space sizes subject to approval by
Planning and Engineering Departments.
2. Proof of Parking Variance.
3. Non drive - through facility.
4. Watershed District permits.
5. Affordable Housing participation.
6. Intersection and signal operational analysis to be conducted by Applicant and
submitted to the Transportation Commission for review; and
7. Installation of a 10 foot high fence, including gate along the northerly
boundary line between subject site and residential neighbors.
Info /Background:
See attached Staff Report, Meeting Minutes and correspondence.
!►
LOCATION MAP
Legend
i ® FSghighled Feahae
m
,. Sbeel Nana Labels
Mmicpal8oundary
f E BWdng_Footp"
�p2 C ks
SEOUId LN .p Lakes - - -
ppacks
pPawels
m
S <
8
a � rrmsTw
�w�
�EIT
EDINA GATEWAY, LLC
PID:3102824330009
4930 77th St W
Edina, MN 55435
i
PC MINUTED JUNE 28, 2006 –
Z -06 -1 Final Rezoning
Conditional Use Permit
Final Development Plan,and
Amendment to the Comprehensivoolaw",\
Edina Gateway, LLC 1
493077 th Street West
Mr. Cornejo informed the Commission tlie.�City Council at their _lay 2,\
2006, meeting granted First Reading to 0 d na ce No. 8564- -29, Le Preliminary
Rezoning approval. At this time the proponents OmittiriJ,for Final
Rezoning, Conditional Use Permit, Final Development Plan and Amendment to
the Comprehensive Plan approval.
Mr. Cornejo presented his staff rep�rf.`)
Mr. Cornejo concluded staff r commen/ s ppraval o f
• Final Rezoning from Planned Office District..(P�OU 1) to Planned
Commercial District,(PCD�2)
• Final Development Plan, hated June t;2006; subject to revisions to
parking provision\ \
• Amendment to the C6mpreheihsive Plan, changing the designation of
4,00 77th Street'West ir6"ffice -to Commercial; and
e \ Bondi ional_Use Permit for res`ident6t dwelling units above the principal
\ us , subject to he foll6�ving conk jons:
Setback variances from Highway 100 and West 77th Street, with final
site plan adjustments regarding parking space sizes subject to
\ approval by Planning and Engineering Departments
Drnnfff D�rlrinn1v�riinnrro
3. NQ drive- throLfgh facility.
4. Waie`hed Distrip6permits.
5. Affordable housing participation.
6. Intemection.�arid signal operational analysis to be conducted by the
Applicant and submitted to the Transportation Commission for review.
And subject to the erection of a 10 foot high fence and additional
landscaping along the northerly property line to include a pass- through gate for
the neighbors.
Mr. James Nelson was present representing the owners of Pentagon
Office Park. Mr. Paul May, Craig Powell and Ben Halberg were also present
representing Pentagon property owners.
Commissioner Workinger asked for clarification on the proposed fence.
Mr. Cornejo pointed out the plans indicate an 8 foot fence; however after the
applicant met with adjoining residential neighbors the installation of a fence 10
feet in height appeared to be the best solution.
Commissioner Grabiel asked how the
is handled. Mr. Cornejo responded it would
contract.
Commissioner Staunton asked if the Coi
land. Mr. Cornejo responded in the affirmative.
ale - housing unit component
pa of the development
A else Permit duns with the
Commissioner Staunton inquired if the required variant
also need to go before the Zoning Board,. Cornejo respoA
variances are tied to the total project and would not�o, before
for a separate hearing. \
Mr. James Nelson,
and explained Pentagon
located in the Twin Cities
location and buildings wei
remains "Class A ", but the
Nelson said the goal of th
site. Mr. Nelson -said in rE
Edina. Mr: Nelson added
on this,aite one
sea pousrng wm "a
a ding at this tin
ed 240 -500+ thou
tnelrship with the I
Concluding, Mr:
along the ,northc
the project
Oroval of the
mina Board
7790 Loch' lard, Terrace, addressed the Commission
)fficefPark of(the first '`oft ce parks" to be
area. Mr�Nelson sai&at_the time of construction the
e,c%nsidered "Class A" but after 45 years the location
office buildings area-"Class C. Continuing, Mr.
l proposal is to redevelop and renovate this 2.1 acre
itxthis sate. is the "gateway" entrance into this part of
in this�prea there are missing land uses, and in reality
all live where th \ey work. Mr. Nelson explained the
of - ale and will be located above one floor of retail
he believes the prince points for the units will be
rld doliars. Mr. Nelson said this project is very proud of
st;Edino Housing Foundation and through their 2nd
b)e
units will be available for qualified buyers.
yid they also have no problem installing a 10 foot fence
ty boundary.
Mr. May addressedAhe Commission and with graphics pointed out
features of the proposed, redevelopment of the site. Notable aspects of the
proposal are the change in the Proof of Parking location; this change would
ensure that vehicle headlights would not impact the residential neighbors. The
building was also moved closer to the golf course and farther from the residential
properties, and the balconies have been recessed. Mr. May pointed out the roof
garden and its environmental qualities, adding the garden roof includes a path
that defines where one would walk. Concluding, Mr. May said building materials
are curtain wall, cast stone, glass, stucco, brick, metal cornices and recessed
balconies.
Commissioner Workinger said in reviewing the plans he became
concerned about spacing in front of the retail components especially if one of the
retail components is a restaurant that wants outdoor seating. Mr. May
acknowledged the probability of an eating establishment or coffee shop, adding
when weather permits the tenant may desire outdoor seafing./Mr, May said
presently what is planned for this "sidewalk" area re raised'olant rs. Mr. May
said the goal of this outdoor sidewalk area is to Is create a pleasant space.
Commissioner Workinger asked Mr. May if thwy ar committed to the,.pplanters,
adding if vehicles park too close to the curb heir bumpers wilhspilI ovet,onto'ihe
sidewalk area and with the planters and outdoor seating on the sidewalk area the
area may become to tight to navigate safely. Mr May acknowledged -,that is
good point and would seriously consider those c�mments: `Commissioner--
Workinger said in this narrow area he would prefefjhattthe planters remain as
part of the plan.
Commissioner Scherer asked Mr'May„if they are comfoftablo with the
amount of parking spaces that are prq�iided'for he condoowners.
Commissioner Scherer said in her o0inion the inajori y of people have at
minimum two vehicles. Mr. May res�'onded � fgqels comfortable with the amount
of parking spaces that are provided forthe c6ndb unit . HO/pointed out the
spaces provided meet Code requirements, the sites ocated on the transit line,
and residents of the building ayfwork in th area and could walk to work.
Commissioner Sc� rer commented that while this may not be an issue
she asked the-developers if-t!jey considered the possibility of errant golf balls
hitting the - large expan -seof glass�on the proposed building. Mr. May responded
that is a'good point, addi4�e glasswind8� s and glass features of the building
will b6con�structed �to neet in Epational by -Ming code and he is sure the glass
used for this project will,,4ave a'\safety factor' built in.
Commissioner Brown moved to recommend Final Rezoning, Final
ipmerit-Plan, Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and Conditional Use
,Approvarfpr esideritial dwelling units above the principal use subject to:
1.
S\elb�ckvarli/nce7lorrn Highway 100 and West 77th Street, with final
site pl'art adjustments regarding parking space sizes subject to
approval\bx Panning and Engineering Departments.
2. Proof of Parking Variance
3. No drive- through facility.
4. Watershed District permits.
5. Affordable housing participation.
6. Intersection and signal operational analysis to be conducted by
Applicant and submitted to the Transportation Commission for review;
and
7. Installation of a 10 foot high fence, including gate along the northerly
boundary line between subject site and residential neighbors.
Commissioner Grabiel seconded the motion. Ayes; Scherer, Staunton,
Schroeder, Thiss Grabiel, Brown, Workinger, Lonsbu oti o Earried.
Commissioner Workinger commented h . a Id unhap if the
proposed planters along the sidewalk were re & v - d an M. d o ly with
outdoor restaurant seating. Akh16
4,95 \r'lr
o e 0
REQUEST FOR COMMISSION /COUNCIL ACTION
Originator
Request
Agenda #
Planning Department
Final Rezoning Approval
Z -06 -1
Conditional Use Permit
C-06 -2
Approval, Final
Development Plan Approval,
and Amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan for
The Edina Gateway
By
Meeting Date/Time
Approved:
Dan Cornejo
June 28, 2006
Interim Planning Director
7:00 PM
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Applicant: Edina Gateway, LLC —
4930 77th Street West, Edina, MN — PID 31- 028 -24 -33 -0009
Request: Final Rezoning Approval, Conditional Use Permit Approval, Final
Development Plan, and Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan
Proposal: Construction of 4 -story building with retail at grade and 3 -floors
of condo units above
Existing Zoning: POD -1
Comprehensive Plan: Amend from Office to Commercial
Deadline for Agency Action: N/A
Application Date: October 10, 2005
60 Days: December 9, 2006
Extensions: yes
120 Days:
STAFF REPORT:
Background:
At their May 2, 2006 meeting, City Council granted First Reading to Ordinance
No. 850 -A -29, i.e. Preliminary Rezoning from Planned Office District 1 (POD -1)
to Planned Commercial District 2 (PCD -2) — Edina Gateway LLC — 4930 77th
Street West, conditioned upon:
1. Setback variance from Highway 100;
2. Proof of Parking Variance;
3. No drive - through any place on the site;
4. Final Rezoning to PCD -2;
5. Watershed District Permits;
6. Preparation of Final Development Plan, including landscaping plans
addressing screening on the north side of the property;
7. Affordable housing participation requiring at least three of the dwelling
units fit into the classification of affordable housing;
8. Conditional Use Permit; and
9. Intersection and signal operational analysis to analysis to be conducted
per the Transportation Commission.
Analysis:
Setback Variance from Highway 100
Section 850.08 Parking and Circulation, Subd. 4 requires a parking setback of
twenty (20) feet from a public right -of -way and ten (10) feet from an interior
side lot line or a rear lot line. However, the interior side lot line setback
applies only when the side lot line is a Planned Commercial District boundary.
In this situation, the interior side lot line boundary is a Planned Office District
1 (POD -1), so this setback requirement does not apply.
-Thi-s-application indicates -a setback of 5 feet from Highway 100, necessitating
a variance of 15 feet. Also, this application indicates a setback of 10 feet
from West 77th Street, necessitating a variance of 10 feet.
In addition to the location of parking relative to the adjacent public rights -of-
way, these requested parking setback variances also have a bearing on
length of parking spaces indicated on the plans.
In the review of the final site plans for this application, the Engineering
Department has determined that the length of the 90- degree parking spaces
(on the west and south portions of the site) does not meet the required 18 feet
for standard spaces. The compact parking spaces on the east portion of the
site do not meet the required 16 feet for compact spaces.
Section 850.08 Parking and Circulation, Subd. 5C. Bumper Overhangs
permits the minimum parking space length to be decreased by 1.5 feet for full
size parking spaces and 1.0 foot for compact spaces which allow the bumper
of the automobile to project beyond the terminus of the parking space without
obstructing other parking spaces or vehicle circulation areas. However, in
their review of these related issues, Planning and Engineering staff have
concluded that the site plan should be revised so that the western and
southern parking spaces could meet Code requirements with greater setback
variances, i.e. 18.5 ft. from Highway 100, and 13.5 ft. from West 77th Street.
Regarding the compact spaces on the eastern portion of the site, these
spaces could be lengthened with no sideyard setback implications, since the
setback requirements do not apply for the eastern sideyard.
The Interim City Planner and the Engineer believe that these larger variances
should be approved, with the final site plan adjustments to the length of the
parking spaces to be determined by staff as part of building permit approval
process.
Proof of Parking Variance
The residential component of this mixed -use proposal is required to provide
45 spaces. This application indicates that 45 spaces are provided, 42
enclosed and 3 exterior.
However, the retail component is required to provide 92 spaces. The
application indicates 92 spaces at grade, including 10 proof of parking
spaces. The proof of parking spaces are located in the south side of the
property near the commercial areas. At such time that the parking is needed,
it can be constructed without affecting the residences within the project or any
adjacent neighbors.
The Applicant has agreed to enter into a Proof of Parking Agreement.
No drive - through
This proposal does not include a drive - through facility.
Final Rezoning to PCD -2
See recommendation below.
Watershed District Permits
Prior to the start of construction, as part of the final staff approvals, the
Applicant will provide the required proof of permits from the Nine Mile Creek
Watershed District.
Final Development Plan
See attached Final Development Plan dated June 7, 2006, including
Landscape Plan on page 5 and Appendix A: Landscape Plans: Details for
proposed 8 -ft. fence on northern boundary of property on page 16 (Sheet
L102). This screening plan has no major changes from the revised
preliminary development plan presented to the City Council.
Affordable Housing Participation (minimum of three units)
The primary vehicle for implementation of the affordable /workforce housing
will be the utilization of the resources of the East Edina Housing Foundation
and its second mortgage program. Edina Gateway will address its initial
marketing to employees of the City, including police, fire, and administrative
personnel; the school district; and major employers in the Southdale,
Centennial, and Pentagon Park areas.
The project will offer three 800 sq. ft., one - bedroom units to buyers with
household incomes from $41,000 to $86,000.
, See attached letter from Jim Nelson, dated June 22, 2006.
Conditional Use Permit
Section 850.16 Planned Commercial District (PCD),Subd. 6 Conditional Uses
in PCD -1. PCD -2 and PCD -3 permits residential dwelling units above
principal uses as a Conditional Use. This application indicates 12 apartment
units (of condominium -style residential ownership) located on three floors
(levels 2 -3-4), totaling 36 units.
Intersection and Signal Operational Analysis
This analysis, intended to optimize signal operations, will be conducted by the
Applicant (and their consultant) prior to completion of the construction, the
results of which will be submitted to the Transportation Commission for their
review. The requirement for this Intersection and Signal Operational Analysis
will be part of the Developer Agreement.
Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan
The current designation for this property is Office. This amendment would
change the designation to Commercial.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of:
1. Final Rezoning of 4930 77th Street West from Planned Office District
(POD -1) to Planned Commercial District (PCD -2).
2. Conditional Use Permit for residential dwelling units above the principal
use, subject to the following conditions:
1. Setback variances from Highway 100 and West 77th Street, as
noted above, with final site plan adjustments regarding parking
space sizes subject to approval by Planning and Engineering
Departments.
2. Proof of Parking variance.
3. No drive - through facility.
4. Watershed district permits.
5. Affordable housing participation as outlined in this report.
6. Intersection and signal operational analysis to be conducted by
the Applicant and submitted to the Transportation Commission
for review.
4 ,
3. Final Development Plan, dated June 7, 2006, subject to revisions to
parking provision as indicated in this report.
4. Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, changing the designation of
4930 77th Street West from Office to Commercial.
MEMORANDUM
To: Kristine Aaker, Assistant Planner
City of Edina
From: Jim Nelson, Owner's Representative
Edina Gateway Project - 4930 West 77th Street
Date: June 22, 2006
Re: Implemenation of Workforce Housing Condition
Prior to preliminary approval by the Edina Planning Commission on February 1,
the Edina Gateway Development team met with representatives of the Edina Housing
Task Force and the Affordable Housing Initiative Coalition to understand the objectives
of those groups in addressing Edina's affordable and workforce housing needs. One of
the original goals of the proposed development has been to provide housing options at a
price point that address the "live where you work" possibilities in Edina.
We welcome the condition that requires a minimum of three "affordable" or
workforce housing units in the Gateway project. The primary vehicle for implementation
of the workforce housing assistance program will be the utilization of the resources of the
East Edina Housing Foundation and its second mortgage program. This resource
achieved a level of success in the 1980's with its assistance to homebuyers in the
Edinborough and Centennial Lakes housing developments by making 300 loans, of which
250 have been repaid.
The board of the East Edina Housing Foundation is currently updating the criteria
for its second mortgage program so that its resources may be utilized with local first
mortgage lending programs and other available assistance from Minnesota Housing
Finance Agency (MHFA), Metropolitan Council and Hennepin County. The coordinated
use of these programs will achieve the level of affordability necessary to facilitate the
purchase of three or more units in the Edina Gateway project within the community's
desired workforce housing objectives.
Edina Gateway will address its initial marketing to employees of the City,
including police, fire and administrative personel; the school district; and major
employers in the Southdale, Centennial Lakes and Pentagon Park areas. The Gateway
sales staff will be trained to offer the housing assistance program to eligible buyers, and
additional information about the program will be provided to area real estate companies.
The lending organizations will be familiar with the project and the programs, and
prepared to offer counsel and assistance to applicants.
The product price range, although not final at this point, is estimated to be at the
$300 /square foot level. The project will offer three 800 /square foot, one bedroom units
that should directly address the minimum price level qualification. Based on preliminary
information, buyers with household income from $41,000 to $86,000 could qualify for
assistance, not only for the minimum unit size, but possibly for smaller two .bedroom
units as well. The unit sizes will range from approximately 800 /square feet to 1490
square feet.
We appreciate the support of the Edina affordable housing advocacy groups and
the cooperation of the City staff in working with us to update the second mortgage
program and to develop relationships with local mortgage lenders who are developing
standards that make the programs workable. We hope to exceed the minimum
requirement of the workforce housing condition.
The following is an example of the criteria being proposed by Bremer Bank, who
would act as first mortgage lender and processor of the second mortgage from East Edina
Housing Foundation. (This information is in the discussion stage and should be regarded
as preliminary, not final.)
Workforce Housing Program:
Criteria —
• Owner — occupied only
• Annual interest payments on 2 "d mortgage, no principal
• Require pre - closing homeownership counseling for first time homebuyers
• 30% of total family income applied to housing expense
Example: Interest rate on 15` mortgage 6.375 %, 40 year amortization
Sale Price $225,000
1" Mortgage P & I Payment
$1,107
Down Payment
Private Mortgage Insurance
83
Loan from
1/12 Property Taxes
200
E.E.H.F. - 33,000
1/12 Property Insurance
60
ls` Mortgage
Monthly Payment Assistance
-75
Amount $192,000
Total Monthly Payment
$1,375
2 "d Mortgage Interest
75
Gross Income
Total Payment
$1,450
Required - $ 40,465
Edina Gateway follow -up material
Dan Cornejo
From: May, Paul G. [PMay @millerdunwiddie.comj
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 8:46 AM
To: kaaker @ci.edina.mn.us; dancornejo @comcast.net; dcornejo @ci.edina.mn.us
Cc: jnelson @eberhardtadvisory.com; mgk @wayzataproperties.com; Lau, Craig R.
Subject: Edina Gateway follow -up material
Attachments: Memo 060621 City.pdf
Kristine and Dan-
Page 1 of 1
Attached is a memo to follow up on your questions regarding the 9 City Council conditions placed on the Gateway
Development project. I hope this will assist in the finalization of your staff report. Please contact me if you have
further questions.
Paul
<<Memo 060621 City.pdf>>
Paul G. May, AIA
Architect
miller dunwiddie architecture
123 North Third Street Suite 104 Minneapolis, MN 55401
d:612- 278 -7712 f:612- 337 -0031 p:612- 337 -0000
www.millerdunwiddie.com
6/22/2006
miller dunwiddie
ARCHITECTURE
Date: June 21, 2006
Project: Edina Gateway
KAM 0505
MEMORANDUM
123 North Third Street Suite 104 Minneapolis MN 55401 -1657 www.miLlerdunwiddie.com p 612- 337 -0000 1 612-337 -0031
RE: Final Development Plan: Response to Project Conditions
To: Kristine Aaker, Assistant Planner
From: Paul G. May, AIA
Summarized below are follow -up responses /additional information from the development team to the 9
conditions for the project noted in the City Council approval of May 2, 2006.
1) Setback Variance from Highway 100: This setback variance is for the. parking area and not the
building. The building meets the setback requirements (50 feet) on all sides. The setback for
parking is 20 feetYfrom street Right of WaYr and 10 from interior lot lines. The actual setback along
Highway 0 Is 5'feet and along West 77 h street is 10 feet. We requested variance is applicable as
there is significant green space within the rights of way.
2) Proof of parking Variance: We have requested a proof of parking variance of 10 spaces. This
parking is for the commercial portion of the project. The intent of the proof of parking is to minimize
the amount of parking lot space, until such time it may be required. The proof of parking spaces are
also located in south side of the property near the commercial areas. At such time that the parking is
needed, it can be constructed without affecting the residences within the projector any adjacent
neighbors.
3) No drive - through any place on the site: There will not be a drive - through within the project.
4) Final Rezoning to PCD -2: The Final Development Plan application has been submitted to the City
for review.
5) Watershed District Permits: Final watershed district permits will result from the review of the final
detailed develop plans of the design team. This will be completed prior to construction beginning.
6) Preparation of Final Development Plan including landscaping plans addressing screening on
the north side of the property: Final development plans have been submitted to the City. Sheet
L102 contains the landscaping plan further detailing the screening along the north side. This
screening plan has no major changes from the revised preliminary development plan presented to
the.City Council
Edina Gateway Page 2
7) Affordable housing participation requiring that at least three of the dwelling units fit into the
classification of affordable housing: A letter from Mr. Jim Nelson, owner's representative for the
project, is being submitted under separate cover providing more detail regarding the implementation
of the plan. I .
8) Conditional Use Permit: A conditional use permit for residential use within the PCD -2 District has
been part of the application process. 12 units of condominium style residential ownership are to be
located on each of the levels 2-4, totaling 36 units.
9) Intersection and signal operational analysis to be conducted per the Transportation
Commission: This will be completed prior to construction of the project, when the analysis will
reflect the conditions at that time.
UAKAM\KAM05050ocumentation\A - Architects\A5 Code Review \Memo 060621 City.doc
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2006
ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND
ORDERING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. A -2
WHEREAS, the Edina City Council on the 41h day of April, 06, fixed a date for
Council hearing on the proposed street reconstruction, Improve nt No. A -223; and
WHEREAS, ten days' mailed notice and two weeks' pu
is notice of the h ing
was given, and the hearing was held thereon on the 2nd day, f May 2006, for Impr ement
No. A -223 Alley Improvement between Beard and Ab ott Avenues recons ding the
existing bituminous pavement and base, repairing t storm sewer and ding where
needed at which time all persons desiring to be h d were given an o ortunity to be
heard thereon.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED at the Council ha my considered the
views of all persons interested, and being ful advised of the pe ent facts, does hereby
determine to proceed with the constr tion of said im ovement, including all
proceedings which may be necessary in minent domain for a acquisition of necessary
easements and rights hereby design ed and shall be ferred to in all subsequent
proceedings as Improvement No. A 23 Alley Improve ent between Beard and Abbott
Avenues reconstructing the existi bituminous pave ent and base, repairing the storm
sewer and grading where neede
BE IT FURTHER RES VED that Impro ement No. A -223 Alley Improvement
between Beard and Abbott enues reconstruc ' g the existing bituminous pavement and
base, repairing the storm er and grading ere needed is hereby ordered as proposed
with construction of th s improvement to a completed during the 2006 construction
season.
BE IT FURTH RESOLVED th the feasibility report for Improvement No. A -223
is hereby received b the Edina City C uncil.
BE IT FUR ER RESOLVE that the City Engineer is hereby designated as the
engineer for thi improvement. T e engineer shall cause plans and specifications to be
prepared for th . making of su7.ay ' provement.
Adopt this 2nd day of 2006. Member Swenson seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
FIRST READING GRANTED TO ORDINANCE NO. 850 -A -29 PRELIMINARY
REZONING PLANNED OFFICE DISTRICT 1 TO PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
2 - EDINA GATEWAY LLC - 4930 77m STREET WEST Affidavits of Notice were presented,
approved and placed on file. Member Housh entered the meeting at 8:25 P.M.
Manager Hughes stated the property was located at 4930 West 77th Street and was presently
zoned Planned Office District POD -1. He stated the proposal was to rezone the property to
Planned Commercial District PCD -2 and also to issue a Conditional Use Permit for the
property to permit housing as a conditional use as part of the project. Mr. Hughes explained
the approval for the Edina Gateway LLC project would be a two -step process. He noted the
conditional use permit and comprehensive plan would not be considered until the final
rezoning and final development plan were requested.
Page 9
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2006
Mr. Hughes said the Planning Commission at their February 1, 2006, meeting, recommended
preliminary rezoning approval to PCD -2 and also recommended approval of the requested
conditional use permit. Those conditions included: final rezoning of the property to PCD -2;
Watershed District Permits; preparation of Final Development Plan including landscaping
plans addressing screening on . the north -side of the property; affordable housing
participation requiring that at least three of the dwelling units fit into the classification of
affordable housing; and final, rezoning conditional upon the issuance of the conditional use
permit for the residential portion of the project. He added the Transportation Commission
also recommended the following conditions: Intersection and signal operational analysis
would be conducted per their recommendation; and a sidewalk connection be made from the
project down to West 771h Street. Mr. Hughes noted the plans before the Council included
the Transportation Commission's requested sidewalk connection to West 77th Street.
Proponent Presentation
Jim Nelson, 7790 Lochmere Terrace, introduced the members of the Gateway LLC Project
Team: Dan Green and Paul May, Architects, Miller Dunwiddie Architecture; Craig Vaughn,
SRF Traffic Consultants; Ben Hartberg, Landscape Architect; Sara Harris, partner to Jim.
Nelson; and M.G. Cominksy, Edina Gateway LLC.
Mr. Nelson reviewed the request of Edina Gateway LLC for rezoning from POD to PCD -2
with a conditional use permit for residential as part of a mixed use property. He said the
retail portion would be approximately 15,000 square feet on the south side of the
development, with the north side being an enclosed parking garage and 26 units of
condominiums in three levels above the garage. Mr. Nelson said the retail will not be
converted to condominiums, and Edina Gateway will retain ownership and lease the
property to its retail tenants.
Mr. Nelson said the proponent has made an effort to respond to the Planning Commission
conditions. He said that they have included affordable housing units in their residential
component. After meeting with the Edina Affordable Housing Coalition, their plan was to
utilize a second mortgage program to provide the affordable units in conjunction with East
Edina Housing Foundation. Mr. Nelson said the condos' price points ranged from $240,000
for one bedroom units to.between $350,000 and $450,000 for the two bedroom units. He said
there would be 21 one bed units and _15 two bedroom units.
Mr. Nelson said the requested change of use was driven by the need to upgrade a forty -five
year old class C office building. He said there was also a market in the surrounding area for.
the service retail and housing based upon a "Live Where You Work" concept. Mr. Nelson
reported their planning process included: neighborhood meetings, held on December 15,
2005 and March 15, 2005; City Planning Staff meetings; one on one sessions with Planning
Commission members; and some one on one neighbor meetings which led to the proponent
developing an understanding of the needs of the neighbors abutting their site; for screening,
privacy fencing and landscaping. It also fostered understanding of the neighbors as to what
was being proposed for the site.
Page 10
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2006
Paul May, Miller Dunwiddie Architecture, using a graphic reviewed in detail the updated
site plan and the requested change of use as follows:
Planning Rationale
• To provide a zoning and use transition, blending between residential and commercial
uses at a unique location.
• To bring housing options to an area of Edina where living and working in the same
neighborhood can be possible
• To innovate within the bounds of zoning guidelines (residential within PCD-2) and
bring mixed -use redevelopment to an area of the City and a property that has been
showing its age
• To provide retail use alternatives in close proximity to an underserved population
Zoning Request
POD -1 PCD -2 • Rezone site from "POD-1 (Planned
Maximum Height 50' 50' Office District) to PCD -2 (Planned
Minimum Setback 50' 50' Commercial District)
Residential Use None CUP • Conditional Use Permit for Residential
within PCD -2
• Reduction in Parking Setback at West
and South property boundary
• Proof -of- Parking for ten (10) spaces on
South
Dan Green, Miller Dunwiddie Architecture, reviewed the design features of the proposed
project using graphics as follows:
Design Features of the Building
• Mixed -Use: Residential above Commercial
• Commercial Retail/ Restaurant Development
• Floors 2-4 have a stepped profile to reduce height impacts and shadows while.
maximizing views and light for residents and neighbors
• Garden roof on second level to reduce storm -water runoff, reduce impervious surface
and provide a visual amenity to residents and neighbors
• Residential parking located internal to building
• Major areas of parking for retail are located on the West and South sides of the
building
• Service entry and trash room located away from residential
• Screening between � properties utilizing a combination of privacy fencing and
landscaping
• Fire Lane - flexible outdoor space created for residents using innovative surface
materials
• Designed access to minimize traffic flow on the north side of site
• Potential location of proof of parking
Craig Vaughn, SRF Traffic Consultant reviewed the traffic study conducted as follows:
• Study objective was to determine the traffic impacts associated with the proposed
redevelopment and make recommendations necessary to mitigate traffic issues
Page 11
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2006
• Developed trip generation estimates for the proposed development using industry
standard trip generation rates
• Developed trip distribution patterns based on historical traffic volume data within the
project study area
• Conducted an operations analysis at four key intersections during the a.m. and p.m.
peak hours for existing, future no build and future ,build conditions
Trip Generation Estimates
• Applied the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) trip generation methodology
• Land use type and size were approximated in order to account for a conservative
estimate
• Resultant trip generation estimates were:
• A.M. Peak Hour = 35 in trips / 55 out trips
• P.M. Peak Hour = 75 in trips / 25 out trips.
• *Existing land rise was currently generating approximately 40 A.M. peak hour trips
and 45. P.M. peak hour trips
Trip Distribution Estimates
• Reviewed historical count data along the regional and local roadway network
• Reviewed existing turning movement count data
• Determined the following trip distribution percentages:
- TH 100 (North) = 40 percent
- TH 100 (South) = 30 percent
- W 77th Street (East) = 20 percent
- W 77th Street (West) =10 percent
Traffic Operation Analysis
• Existing condition: all key intersections currently operated at acceptable levels of
service.
• No build condition: all key intersections will continue to operate at acceptable levels of
service
• Build condition: all key intersections will operate at acceptable levels of service, with
signal timing modifications at three key intersections along W. 77th Street
Traffic Summary
• Study objective was to determine the traffic impacts associated with the proposed
development and make recommendations necessary to mitigate traffic issues
• Redevelopment of the existing office site will result in approximately 90 a.m. and 100
p.m. peak hour additional vehicle trips. However, the existing land use has the
potential to generate approximately 70 a.m. and 65 p.m. peak hour vehicle trips
• The adjacent roadway network will operate acceptably with minor mitigation
measures (i.e., signal timing improvements)
• TDMP
Member Masica asked whether the proposed eight foot fence would be allowed under Edina
Code, for further detail on a "French balcony', exterior materials proposed, drainage from
the proposed "garden roof', the location of catch basins, how many affordable units were
proposed, and what if any variances were being requested.
Page 12
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2006
Mr. Hughes explained Edina Code restricted fences to six feet in front yard so the proposed
sideyard fence was allowed by Code. He also explained the variances requested for the
property related to parking setback from the Highway 100 ramp and also parking quantity
which the proponent proposed to satisfy with a proof of parking agreement. Mr. Green
explained French balconies were very shallow allowing only a door to be open, but no area
for seating or outdoor activities. He added the building was more conceptual currently, but
the upper level of the building was proposed to be pre -case cement and glass with the base of
the building glazed with windows and aluminum throughout the entire structure. Mr. May
explained the "green roof" would drain just the same as a regular roof into storm drains
located as required by the City on the property. He pointed out the locations using a graphic
of the site plan. Mr. Nelson stated at the current time three units were designated as
affordable units, but that he did not want to limit or stretch the project at this time noting that
possible more units could be affordable.
Member Swenson's questions included: the location where trash will be kept and picked up,
were 'the common areas' on the green roof for condo residents only, and would the proponent
guarantee no drive through restaurants on the site. Mr. May used the graphic to demonstrate
the circulation on the west and east sides pointing out the trash storage location and how it
would be accessed to be removed. He added the upper patios on the green roof would be
used only by condo residents and their guests. Mr. May assured the Council there would be
no drive through restaurants on the site.
Member Housh asked about the proposed price points of the unit, what type of retail was
proposed, how large a restaurant would be located in the retail area, and commented that
when the Final Plans were submitted the Council's expectation was that the project would be
built exactly as depicted on the plans. Mr. May explained the price points would range from
about $240,000 to $450,000 with the one bedroom units at the lower end and the two bedroom
units at the upper end. Mr. Nelson said that he expected the retail to include dry cleaner,
UPS Store, and a small restaurant offering soup, salads and sandwiches. He added they did
not. intend to house a drive through or serve alcohol.
Member Hulbert asked if the fire lane was. required or optional and also for more detail on
the "green roof ". Mr. May said the fire lane would be used by emergency and service
vehicles. Mr. Hartberg explained a green roof would have an irrigation system below the
soil. It would be designed to hold rain water and have plantings and patio areas for use by
residents. He added it could hold storm water from semi intensive rains of between
approximately four inches up to twelve inches.
Mayor Hovland's questions included: further detail on the use of green roofs; the location of
the proposed fence on the north side of the project; where the plantings were proposed; who
would be eligible for the "affordable" housing units; and whether any qualifiers could be
added to favor Edina residents receiving the affordable units. Mr. May said it was the goal of
the developer to have the green roof manage up to twelve inches of rainfall allowing the
water to be filtered two to three times before it flows into the catch basins and storm sewer.
He said the north side fence will be built behind the retaining wall and the landscape
plantings would be on the Gateway property. Mr. Nelson said he believed persons who
Page 13
4
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2006
qualify under the Metropolitan Council's guidelines would be eligible for the affordable
housing units. He added they have been working with the East Edina Housing Foundation
and some local banks. Mr. Hughes added that it was not possible to place local restrictions
on affordable housing so only Edina residents were eligible, but that preference could be
given to Edina residents who qualified for the units.
Public Comment
Betty Conners, 7504 West Shore Drive, asked about the height of the retaining wall. Ms.
Connors said that she was a walker and would like to continue walking without jumping
down a four and a half foot retaining wall.
Doug Mayo, 6041 Tower Avenue, Edina Housing Initiative, commented on how expensive
housing has become in Edina. Mr. Mayo noted the proponent has agreed to provide between
three and nine affordable housing units in the project. He urged approval of the project.
Jeff Hugget, 4008 Woodland Drive, member of the Edina Housing Task Force, also spoke in
support of the project and urged approval.
Member Masica made a motion to close the public hearing, seconded by Member Hulbert.
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
Member Masica commented the proponent had done a good job working with the neighbors
in satisfying their concern. She felt the project filled a need in the community and stated her
intention to support the project
Member Hulbert concurred with Member Masica. She added she felt the Council needed to
be careful with what was approved next to residential areas. Member Hulbert said she
generally supported the project, but asked that there be no drive - throughs or any liquor
license of any type be allowed on the project.
Member Housh said he agreed with previous speakers in his appreciation of the developer's
efforts to work with the neighbors. He said he was not sure about limiting the site to no
liquor licenses of any type.
Member Swenson said she felt the timing of the project was good, she agreed she liked the
way the developer worked with the neighbors, the green roof was very timely and a
condition of approval must include that no drive - through would be allowed on the site.
Mayor Hovland stated he also liked the project and the collaborative effort the developer and
neighbors brought forward which ultimately yielded a better project. He praised the project
for its inclusion of affordable housing and the green roof. Mayor Hovland cautioned the
developer, that when they brought forward final plans they must be very specific and intend
to build their project exactly per the plans presented to the Council. Mayor Hovland
supported the rezoning and adding a condition of no drive - throughs. He asked staff to
review the necessary conditions.
Page 14
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2006
Mr. Hughes reviewed the conditions as follows: 1) Setback variance from Highway 100; 2)
Proof of Parking Variance; 3) No drive - through any place on the site; 4) Final Rezoning to
PCD -2; 5) Watershed District Permits; 6) Preparation of Final Development Plan including
landscaping plans addressing screening on the north side of the property; 7) Affordable
housing participation requiring that at least three of the dwelling units fit into the
classification of affordable housing; 8) Conditional Use Permit; and 9) Intersection and signal
operational analysis to analysis to be conducted per the Transportation Commission. Mr.
Hughes and Mr. Gilligan said it would not be possible to put conditions on the zoning so
prohibiting liquor licenses from the site could not be a condition of the requested rezoning.
Member Swenson made a motion to made a motion to grant First Reading to Ordinance
No. 850 -A -29 conditioned upon: 1) Setback variance from Highway 100; 2) Proof of Parking
Variance; 3) No drive- through any place on the site; 4) Final Rezoning to PCD -2; 5)
Watershed District Permits; 6) Preparation of Final Development Plan including
landscaping plans addressing screening on the north side of the property; 7) Affordable
housing participation requiring that at least three of the dwelling units fit into the
classification of affordable housing; 8) Conditional Use Permit; and 9) Intersection and
signal operational analysis to analysis to be conducted per the Transportation
Commission. Member Housh seconded the motion.
Rollcall
Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -56 ADOPTED GRANTING FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
TARGET CORPORATION - 7000 YORK AVENUE SOUTH Affidavits of Notice were
presented, approved and placed on file.
Mr. Hughes explained the request before the Council was for Final Development Plan for
Target Corporation at 7000 York Avenue South. He said the property was properly zoned
PCD -3 for the proposed use. Mr. Hughes said Edina Code required the proponent to obtain
a Final Development Plan for the size of the proposed expansion. He reported the project
had been reviewed by the Planning Commission on March 1, 2006, and again on March 29,
2006. The Planning Commission at their March 29, 2006, meeting, recommended denial of
the requested Final Development Plan. He noted the Council had received their reasons for
denial which included: proponent's lack of housing, disappointment with building design
and exterior building materials and no evidence of a hardship to support the requested
variance.
Mr. Hughes reported the Transportation Commission reviewed the Target Expansion Impact
Study and TDM Plan at their December 15, 2005, meeting and approved the study and TDM
plan with conditions. He said that Alice Roberts Davis would lead off the Target
presentation.
Proponent Presentation
Alice Roberts Davis, Real Estate Manager, Target Corporation, said she is responsible for the
project. Ms. Davis said a Super Target in the community would be a great amenity due to its
Page 15
Jackie Hoogenakker
From: DEBerg100 @aol.com
nt: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 1:11 PM
10: Jackie Hoogenakker
Subject: case file: Z -06 -1
RE: EDINA GATEWAY, LLC
I am, David E. Berg of 4905 Poppy Lane in Edina ph #952 - 927 -4988
I am a lifelong Edina resident, growing up on Edina Blvd. and purchased my first home on Hollywood Rd.
I have lived on Poppy Lane since 1989.
I am in favor of the new condo) retail unit over the current office building. My only comment is that the
building sketches were of a very ugly,' contemporary building ..... NOT fitting into the standards Edina has
set over the years. This very well could be the first of many such buildings to line the south side of the
golf course .... and will set the pace for decoration. The current plan is ugly ... and the coordinator of the
project agrees. If we're going to put up a building, let's make it look good! You'll only be helping the
owner, who obviously is color blind .... more people will want to live / shop there if it doesn't look like a
building that belongs on South Beach in Miami. Picture the building in Downtown Edina ... that's what
Edina's "look" is .... upscale traditional .... lasting .... NOT South Beach contemporary.
Thank You!!
vid E. Berg
7/14/2006
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Dan Cornejo
Interim City Planner
Date:. July 18, 2006
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
Subject:
Conditional Use Permit for
St. Patrick' Catholic Church
6820 St. Patrick's Lane
Recommendation:
Agenda Item: II. B.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
®
To Council
Action: ❑
Motion
®
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
At their June 28, 2006, Planning Commission meeting the Commission
recommended Conditional Use Permit Approval and that the Applicant met the findings
,for. the granting of a conditional use permit:
1: Will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental
to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, and general welfare;
2.: Will not cause undue traffic hazards, congestion, or parking shortages;
3. Will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment, or decrease the value, of other
property in the vicinity, and will not be a nuisance;
4. Will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of other
property in the .vicinity;
5. Will not create an excessive burden on parks, streets, and other public facilities;
6. Conforms to the applicable restrictions and special conditions of the district in
which it is located; and
7. Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
Conditions for approval including variances are:
1. Staff approval of final landscape plan and schedule of plantings.
2. Applicant obtains a Watershed District permit.
3. The suggestion that the church conduct further soil studies.
Info /Background:
See attached Staff Report, Planning Commission Minutes, correspondence and
plans.
PC MEETING JUNE 28, 2006
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JUNE 28, 2006 —
C-06 -5 Conditional Use Permit
St. Patrick's Catholic Church
6820 St. Patrick's Lane _
Mr. Cornejo informed the Commission,St. Pateick'syCatholic,Church -is a ,
13 acre parcel in West Edina located off Valley,View and,Gleason Roads. Mr/
Cornejo said St. Patrick's Church is requesting''Conditional ;Use Permitto, "�
construct a garage, trash enclosure, labyrinth, sidewalk modification and repair
and resurfacing of the existing parking lot. Continuing, Mr.,Cornejo noted the
proposed garage is residential in nature and its 'impact would,be minimal.
Variances are required for the garage.,/ "
Mr. Come jo concluded staff supports the request fora-Conditional Use
Permit including variances subject to:
V
• Staff approval of finai'landscape plan__and schedule of plantings.
• Applicant obtains a Watershed;,District permit.
Mr. Snyder architect for the project and Mr. Crow, along with church
members were - present. \
Commissioner Grabiel askedyhy Co%nmission action would be required
for the labyrinth, it reaty isn't'a structures Mr. Cornejo said any change to the site
plan triggers the need for a Conditional Use Permit.
Commissioner Staunton commented it appears to him the major issues of
this Rroposat'are the proposed garage and trash enclosure and questioned if the
Commission w4e�to deny /ihe CUP for just the garage would the concrete
enclosure'the proposed,f araqe� would be constructed on remain. Mr. Cornejo
responded thaexisting concrete structure would remain as is. He said that
concrete structure,has been located on the site for many years.
Mr. Paul Snyder & R, architect for the project told the Commission
the concrete structure that will serve as the base for the proposed garage has
been on the site for many years and in the past the structure was used as an
enclosure for an oil tank farm. Mr. Snyder told the Commission another piece
that is very interesting about this concrete structure is that the main gas meter
and other utilities for the church are located in the structure and to move or
PC MEETING JUNE 28, 2006
demolish the structure would also impact the utility connections that continue to
serve the church. Mr. Snyder said in reviewing the site constructing the
proposed garage on this concrete structure made the most sense. Mr. Snyder
said the concrete structure seems to create an attractive nuisance for teens.
Concluding, Mr. Snyder explained the proposed garage is residential in nature
and would keep church vehicles off the parking lot. The proposed screening of
the trash enclosure also "cleans up" the site. i,,
Commissioner Staunton noted there ap
trees on the south end of the church site. Mr.
adding there are large coniferous trees betwe(
existing concrete structure. Mr. Snyder said Itt
to screen the concrete structure /garage fromit
Brown told the Commission he knows that hog
vegetation provides screening between propel
Chair Lonsbury asked Mr. Snyder if tl
and if soil testing was done. Mr. Snyder re6
representative informed the Commission he
and believes the church would be am,enablE
Mr. Mike Crow, representing
church held a neighborhood meeti
changes to the church campus. H
expressed concern with the- cpncre
could get hurt climbing opli. Mr. �.0
nuisance for teens, adding,,he beli-
the attractiveness-of this isolated s
previously -fnen
trees vyilf remaii
Church of St. "P
proposed imprc
would abPrecia
chu
:luding, Mr.'
is one�of th
your su
be a number of large
onfirmed That statement
afest house'and the
nearest rouse. -c;
very well, adding
conta ners have`
3d he is no't -certa
believes \Phase I W.-
to further soil tests.
an removed
A church
was done,
the church informed the Commission the
ng informing neighbors of the proposed
c,said not only.the/chu`rch but neighbors
to structure and the possibility that someone
row said this. -area- -has also been an attractive
eves the construction of a garage will eliminate
)ot:_- \Continuing, Mr. Crow pointed out as
to contains a number of large trees and those
Crow said- in his opinion the campus of the
e most beautiful sites in Edina and the
enhance the site. Mr. Crow stated the church
Ms. Jo`Ellen Dever, 7405 Oaklawn Avenue, told the Commission she
thinks the construction of a' new;garage and screening the trash enclosure(s) is a
plus for the site; howeverher problem is with the three signs posted on the site
informing residents a bondio nal Use Permit has been requested. Ms. Dever
stated the three signs do not meet Code standards. Ms. Dever suggested to
avoid confusion thatthe;church erect new signs according to code. Ms. Dever
added she was surprised to learn the church is responsible for erecting the
required informational signs, not the City, concluding there may be a better way
to "get the word out" when an application is made.
Chair Lonsbury thanked Ms. Dever adding it is possible the City could do
a better job on the procedural part of the application to make sure applicants are
F,
PC MEETING JUNE 28, 2006
aware of the sign requirement, and to ensure sign(s) are erected according to
code. Chair Lonsbury urged church members to erect the proper signs before
the City Council hears this request. Concluding, Chair Lonsbury said he was
aware of the inadequate signs prior to this discussion and learned from staff that
three signs were erected; however, the font size was incorrect and the color
bands of the signs were incorrect. Chair Lonsbury said in a sense, even though
the signs did not meet the letter of the code they alerted the neighborhood and
City Hall received a number of inquiries on what the church_ was-proposing.
A church representative acknowledged thieo .,signs were posted; however
because of time restraints they were hand -made withoutthe proper`type font or
the required red /black bands. (` �;��'��
Commissioner Staunton added if he understands City Code correctly thi "s
"oversight" does not nullify the proceedings this,evening and. the Commission can
act on the request: Commissioner Staunton also rged church, imembers to erect
the signs according to code as soon as possible.
Commissioner Grabiel moved to/recommend Cond
Approval subject to: staff approval of final landscape plate,
plantings and Watershed District permits.(/ Conditions of a
include setback variance for the garage and that addition
conducted. Commissioner Scherer s6conddd th/e motion'
Chair Lonsbury said,ai
meets the findings for the/gra
1. Will,.Dromote and
general welfare;'\,
2. Will not cause undd
3. �l ill not be inju us
of other property,ln
4." Will not impede the
of other property)n
,.5` Will not create all e:
facilities\
vote indicates the
the permit:
�[ Use Permit
schedule of
val are also to
I tests are .
itional Use Permit
ance'the general public welfare and will not be
irtger the,public health, safety, morals, and
traffic heza rs, congestion, or parking shortages;
),,the use and enjoyment, or decrease the value,
e.,vicinity, and will not be a nuisance;
)rural and orderly development and improvement
burden on parks, streets, and other public
6. Conforms to'the applicable restrictions and special conditions of the
district in which it is located; and
7. In consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
Ayes; Scherer, Staunton, Schroeder, Grabiel, Brown, Thiss, Workinger,
Lonsbury. Abstain, Workinger. Motion carried.
M
REQUEST FOR COMMISSION /COUNCIL ACTION.
o e
N
ry � .�y
Originator
Request
Agenda #
Planning Department
Conditional Use Permit
C-06 -5
Dan Cornejo
Meeting Date/Time
Approved:
Interim Planning Director
June 28, 2006 / 7 PM
PC 6/28/06
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Applicant: The Church of St. Patrick of Edina
6820 St. Patrick's Lane / PID: 06- 116 -21-44 -0004
Request: Amendment to Conditional Use Permit Approval
Proposal: Construction of garage on existing foundation walls, construction of
a labyrinth, and other related improvements
Existing Zoning: R -1
Comprehensive Plan: Quasi Public
Deadline for Agency Action:
Application Date: June 7, 2006
60 Days: August. 7, 2006
Extensions:
120 Days:
STAFF REPORT:,
Background:
On June 17, 1991 St. Patrick's Church was granted a Conditional Use Permit for
additions to the church building for office space, nursery, choir room, and entry
gathering space. New driveways were constructed from Valley View Road to
serve the new entry. The only significant public issue with that development was
how storm water from the site was being handled. As a condition of approval,
the church agreed to redirect the runoff into the public storm sewer system.
Project Site and Context/Neighborhood Description:
The project site is located on the SE quadrant of Valley View Road and Gleason
Road. The overall site contains approximately 13 acres. The current project
proposal contains a several items on various locations within the site, detailed
below under Project bescription.
To the northwest of this property lies St. Albans Church, at the edge of the Indian
Hills neighborhood. To the north, east, south, and west lay single - family homes
Project Description:
The Church of St. Patrick is planning to improve its facilities through several
projects on a portion of the site south of the church, the existing parking lots, and
at the northeast entrance to the classroom wing:
1. Vehicle Storage Garage (on existing foundation walls) at southern
perimeter of the site.
The proposed vehicle storage garage has been designed to utilize the
existing concrete foundation, which was originally used to screen three
large fuel tanks in a semi - sunken enclosure. The existing concrete
foundation will be modified to allow placement of 12" thick precast
concrete planks over the walls, to create the garage floor. The new
garage has been designed to be residential in nature, and uses materials
that are present in the existing church, i.e. red brick with white trim. The
roof will be of a four hip design with shingles.
-The dimensions of the proposed garage are 28 ft. by 36 ft. (1,008 sq. ft.).
The height of the proposed garage will be 15 ft. on the parking lot side,
and 24 ft. 6 in. on the proposed labyrinth side.
The location of the existing structure is 9.6 feet from the south and west
property corner, which is inside the required 50 ft. setback for a new
structure of this type in this zoning district.
2. Trash Enclosure, also at the southern perimeter, adjacent to the proposed
garage.
The new trash enclosure would replace the three large dumpsters that
currently sit on the west parking lot. The trash enclosure would be
constructed of brick with gates made of steel frame and composite boards
of colors to match the church and garage.
The dimensions of the proposed trash enclosure are 14 ft. by 28 ft. (392
sq. ft.).
3. Labyrinth, also at the southern perimeter, directly east of the proposed
garage, in a depressed area of the site, roughly 7 -10 ft. below the level of
the parking lot.
This application contains only a preliminary design for the proposed
labyrinth. Materials have not been determined, but typically the materials
are brick, stone pavers, or crushed rock for the pathways, and grass or
ground cover infill the spaces between the walkways. Additional
landscaping, including trees and shrubs, Access to the labyrinth will be
from the Church building on the north, via a simple concrete stairway. The
Applicant intends that this new labyrinth provide a more park -like
experience desiring a quiet contemplative retreat; this labyrinth will be
open to use by the neighbors.
4. Parking lot improvements, to the east and west parking lots.
The church plans to repair and resurface the east and west parking lots,
including demolition of much of the paved surface to bring the underlying
soil structure to correct bearing capacity; the lots will then be top dressed
and restriped.
5. Sidewalk modifications, on the northeast side of the church building.
A small section of sidewalk will be added from the eastern church
entrance to the north -south sidewalk which leads from the parking lot to
the administrative entrance to the classroom wing.
Analysis of Issues:
With respect to the siting of the proposed vehicle storage garage, the church is
requesting a variance from the required 50 ft. setback. A variance is granted
when the strict enforcement of the Code would cause undue hardship because of
circumstances unique to the petitioner's property and the granting of said
variance is in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Code. "Undue hardship"
means that (i) the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use as
allowed by the Code, (ii) the plight of the petitioner is due to circumstances
unique to the petitioner's property which were not created by the petitioner; and
(iii) the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the property or
its surroundings.
The Applicant has provided the following arguments in response:
1. The existing foundation, which is proposed to be used as the foundation
for the garage, is 9.6 ft. from the Property line. We believe that moving
the existing structure would be an undue hardship which was not self -
imposed. In addition, moving the structure would not be a mere
inconvenience.
2. The conditions that exist are unique to this property. The owner believes
the new garage at this location will correct the current unsightly and
somewhat hazardous conditions, while providing secure storage for the
church vehicles.
3. These improvements maintain the property rights of adjacent land owners
and other properties in the district. The existing conditions have existed
from the time the church was built and the planned improvements will
provide a more "neighborhood friendly" facility.
4. The design of the garage facility has been developed with the public
welfare in mind. The church sincerely believes that this new structure will
benefit the public welfare and will not injure other properties in the vicinity
or zoning district.
Staff has reviewed this response and believes it makes a reasonable case for
approval. This proposed garage, at the location proposed, is an acceptable
solution to mitigating an existing "nuisance," while providing a new facility for the
church to store church vehicles in a manner that is more in character with the
surrounding properties and neighborhood.
With respect to the proposed trash enclosure, the only public issue relates to the
change in the storm water runoff from the site, due to the need to build up a
portion of the sloping area to the east of the parking lot to provide a base for the
trash enclosure. This plan has been referred to the Nine Mile Creek Watershed
District for review and comment.
With respect to the proposed labyrinth, there are two public issues. This
labyrinth is proposed to be a significant feature on the site, and therefore, the
final design should-be reviewed- and approved by staff. When this is completed,
the Applicant should submit an amended overall site plan to the City for inclusion
into the official Conditional Use Permit file. Second, the final plan is likely to
cause some change in the drainage patterns for that area, as well as affect the
storm water runoff situation for the entire site. Therefore, even though this plan
is submitted as preliminary, staff has referred it to the Nine Mile Creek
Watershed. District for review and comment of this feature.
With respect to items 4 and 5 above (parking lot improvements and sidewalk
modifications), these are minor in nature and deemed acceptable by staff with no
further comment necessary. Nevertheless, the Nine Mile Creek Watershed
District has been asked to review this component of the application.
Finally, the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District has responded that their review
of the preliminary plans concluded that the final plans will be required to obtain a
permit for the parking lot improvements.
Recommendation:
Staff believes that the proposed garage, trash enclosure, labyrinth, and other
repair and upgrading projects for the west and east parking lots and sidewalks,
represent a desirable upgrading of the existing church facility. Further, staff
believes that the establishment, maintenance, and operation of the uses and
form of development proposed by the Applicant meet the findings for the granting
of a conditional use permit:
1. Will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be_
detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, and general
welfare;
2. Will not cause undue traffic hazards, congestion, or parking shortages;
3. Will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment, or decrease the value, of
other property in the vicinity, and will not be a nuisance;
4. Will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of
other property in the vicinity;
5. Will not create an excessive burden on parks, streets, and other public
facilities;
6. Conforms to the applicable restrictions and special conditions of the
district in which it is located; and
7. Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
Therefore, staff recommends approval of the proposed amendment to the
existing Conditional Use Permit, including the requested variance. Conditions for
approval are:
1. Staff approval of final landscape plan and schedule of plantings.
2. Applicant obtains a Watershed District permit.
A-T S_ &
ARMSTRONG TORSETH SKOLD & RYDEEN INC
June 7, 2006
Planning Commission Members and Council Members
4801 West Fiftieth Street
Edina, MN 55424
Re: The Church of St. Patrick — Renewal of Conditional Use Permit
Dear Commissioners and Council Members,
On behalf of The Church of Patrick I would like to request that you consider for approval
the attached application for Condition Use Permit.
IMPROVEMENTS
The church is planning to improve its facilities through several projects on a portion of
the site south of the church, the existing parking lots and at the northeast entrance to the
classroom wing.
1. Vehicle Storage Garage (on existing foundation walls)
The primary improvement is to build a vehicle storage garage for the automobiles which
are owned by the church and which are currently stored at the south end of the parking
lot, unprotected. The proposed garage has been designed to utilize the existing concrete
foundation, which was originally used to screen three large fuel tanks in a semi- sunken
enclosure. Please refer to the site plan and aerial photographs for the location of the
proposed garage.
The structure has 12" thick cast -in -place concrete walls which have been determined to
be capable of supporting the vehicles and garage structure. In addition Clark Engineering
Inc., Structural Engineers (St. Louis Park, MN) has verified the capacity of the soils to
carry the weight.
The structure has been designed to be residential in nature, and use materials that are
present in the existing church (red brick with white trim). The roof will be of a four hip
design with shingles. Please refer to the attached computer images which illustrate the
design and character of the proposed garage. The existing concrete structure will be
ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING - TECHNOLOGY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN
8 5 0 1 G O L D E N V A L L E Y R 0 A D 5 U I T E 3 0 0 M I N N E A P O L I S M I N N E S O T A 5 5 4 2 7
PHONE 763 . 545. 3731 763 . 525 . 3289 FAX
Church of St. Patrick
Conditional Use Permit Application
June 7, 2006
Page 2 of: 4
modified to allow placement of 12" thick precast concrete planks over the walls, to create
the garage floor.
The location of the existing structure is 9.6 ft. from the south and west property corner,
which is inside the normal 50 ft setback for a new structure of this type in this zoning
district.
The church believes that by building the garage over the existing foundation walls it can
utilize the concrete foundation and at the same time mitigate what is currently an
attractive nuisance.
Please refer to the attached photographs of the existing structure which show these
conditions
2. Trash Enclosure
Currently the church has three large dumpsters, (see photographs) which it would like to
contain in a new trash enclosure which would be built adjacent to the new garage, but not
connected to the garage.
The new trash enclosure will be constructed of brick with gates made of a steel frame and
composite boards (wood and plastic) of colors to match the church and garage.
3. Labyrinth
The church is currently working with a labyrinth designer to develop a labyrinth on the
lower area of the site directly east of the proposed garage. At this time the materials for
the labyrinth have not been determined, but typically the materials are brick, stone .
pavers, or crushed rock are used for the pathways and grass or ground cover infill the
spaces between the walkways. Additional landscaping, including trees and shrubs, will
be. added to better define the labyrinth area and to screen the garage facility from view of
the labyrinth.
Access to the labyrinth will be by a simple concrete stairway. A bituminous pathway,
which will provide an accessible route (5 % grade) to the labyrinth and the lower storage
facility, (located under the vehicle storage garage).
4. Parking lot improvements
The church will be repairing and resurfacing the east and west parking lots. Repairs will
include demolish of as much of the paved surface as is required to bring the underlying
soil structure to correct bearing capacity, then the lots will be top dressed and restriped.
5. Northeast sidewalk modifications
Church of St. Patrick
Conditional Use Permit Application
June 7, 2006
Page 3 of: 4
A small section of sidewalk will be added from the eastern church entrance to the north -
south sidewalk which leads from the parking lot to the administrative entrance (classroom
wing).
CONSIDERATIONS
The church has designed these projects with the intention that the proposed
improvements will benefit the church and surrounding neighborhood by:
1. Eliminating the attractive nuisance which currently exists with the old fuel storage
facility, and replace it with an enclosed and secure place to store church vehicles. The
new facility will'also remove the vehicles from sight of potential vandals.
2. Locating the garage facility in place which will not cause traffic congestion or
eliminate valuable parking spaces.
3. Removing conditions which might be injurious to the use, or enjoyment of adjacent
properties, and will certainly mitigate an existing nuisance.
4. Allowing for the normal development of other properties in the vicinity.
5. Creating a facility which will not place excessive burden on city facilities. It is the
intent of the church that the new labyrinth will provide a more park -like experience for
individuals desiring a quiet contemplative retreat and will be open to use by neighbors.
,6. Creating improvements that conform to all other applicable restrictions of this district,
(with the exception of setback requirements).
7. Constructing improvements which are consistent with the City of Edina
_Comprehensive Plan. No significant changes to the use of the property are proposed.
TIME SCHEDULE
The improvements illustrated here are intended to be completed, or begun, within a two
year time period as required by the requirements of the Conditional Use Permit.
GARAGE SETBACK
The church respectfully requests that the Commission and Council consider a allowing
the garage to be constructed inside the normal setback on the basis of the following
arguments:
1. The existing foundation, which is proposed to be used as the foundation for the
garage, is 9.6 ft from the property line. We believe that moving the existing structure
Church of St. Patrick June 7, 2006
Conditional Use Permit Application Page 4 of. 4
would be an undo hardship which was not self - imposed. In addition, moving the
structure would not be a mere inconvenience.
2. The conditions that exist are unique to this property. The Owner believes the new
garage at this location will correct the current unsightly and somewhat hazardous
conditions, while providing secure storage for the church vehicles.
3. These improvements maintain the property rights of adjacent land owners and other
properties in the district. The existing conditions have existed from the time the
church was built and the planned improvements will provide a more "neighborhood
friendly" facility.
4. The design of the garage facility has been developed with the public welfare in mind.
The church sincerely believes that this new structure will benefit the public welfare
and will not injure other properties in the vicinity or zoning district .
\Thank you for your consideration of this "renewal' of the existing Conditional Use
Permit, we sincerely believe the improvements discussed here will benefit the
neighborhood as well as provide for the needs of the church.
Sincerely;
Paul nyder AIA
Project Architect
(MN Lic. 14813)
Cc: Father Gregory Welch, Pastor
Ms. Sheryl Rose, Parish Administrator
Mr. Michael Crowe, Construction Manager
Mr. Robert Gunderson, ATS &R Landscape Architect
Encl: Conditional Use Permit Application
Legal Description of the property
$700 Check
Current Site Survey (Enviroscience, Inc.)
Site Plan (ATS &R , Inc.)
Site and Structure Photographs
GROO TERS&A SSOCIA TES / ARCHUEC IS
u
IC-
Aft, AV,
Church of St. Patrick — Edina, Minnesota
Figure 3 — Existing Structure Looking East
Figure 4 — Existing Structure Looking South
S'
�'= J',
� ±'
♦.
.�
`, ���
... � 3x
x.r17,
AII- 11
ml'n¢
is
A! `r
k
1�
I
ir�l
ttt
ir�l
"oe
Or
7:1
LJ
Vehicle Storage Garage
' s
T"OPP
r
ry
"law
i1
Vehicle Storage Garage
o e
J .�y REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor Hovland and Members of the City Council
FROM: John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation
VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
DATE: July 18, 2006
AGENDA ITEM: IV.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Courtney Fields Shelter Building and Baseball Field
Compan y
1. Rachel Contracting
2. Meisinger Construction
3. CM Construction
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Rachel Contracting $828,463.00
Amount of Ouote or Bid
1. $828,463.00
2. $887,800.00
3. $926,800.00
Account #47041.6710 & 4702.6710
GENERAL INFORMATION:
On Wednesday, June 28, 2006, bids were opened for the renovation of the Courtney Fields shelter
building and baseball field #4. Three bids were received:
Contractor: Rachel Contracting Meisinger Construction CM Construction
Base Bid: $809,963.00
$855,000.00
$894,800.00
Alternate #1 18,500.00
32,800.00
32,000.00
Alternate #2 5,400.00
6,000.00
6,000.00
Alternate #3 4,200.00
5,300.00
6,000.00
Alternate #1 is and add - alternate for installation of underground utilities (sanitary sewer and water)
across field #4 to serve the relocation and replacement of the Courtney Fields maintenance garage
scheduled to be built in 2007. Alternate #2 is an add - alternate for the construction of a concrete
plaza area on the north side of the Courtney Fields shelter building. Alternate #3 is an add - alternate
for the installation of quart' tile flooring for the shelter building lobby area.
Staff and the project consultants are recommending approval of the lowest bidder, Rachel
Contracting, and accept alternate number one, installation of underground utilities to serve the
future maintenance garage building.
As directed by Council, staff hired the professional services of Anderson/Johnson Associates who
teamed with Armstrong, Torseth, Skold and Rydeen, Inc. Architects and Engineers (ATS &R) to
conduct a feasibility study for the renovation of the Courtney Fields shelter building. Anderson/
2
Johnson and Associates was also the lead architect/engineering firm that designed and built the Van
Valkenburg Park softball complex. The design input committee included Assistant Director Ed
MacHolda, John Keprios, and three volunteers from the Edina Baseball Association; President
Kathryn Peterson, and Chip Howard and Dave Engler.
The architects' previous feasibility study showed that there is a substantial savings to retaining the
existing exterior walls, plumbing walls, and electrical panel wall into the new design. There is a
savings of close to $100,000 to use those existing walls in the new design versus total demolition
and replace with new construction.
At the January 17, 2006, meeting, the Council approved the 2006 Capital Improvement Plan which
included $450,000 for upgrade of the Courtney Fields shelter building and $312,000 for renovation
of field #4 at the Courtney Fields Baseball Complex. At that time, our consultants and staff
believed we could bring this project from that concept design stage to a final design phase that
would be within budget. In this case, the lowest bid came in substantially over the predicted
budgeted amount. If awarded to Rachel Contracting as proposed by staff and consultants, total
project costs would be:
Base Bid
$809,963.00
Alternate #1
18,500.00
Soft Costs
70,544.00
Seeding Contractor
6,000.00
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS
$905,007.00
Alternate #1 for $18,500 is being recommended by staff and consultants because it is a very good
alternate bid price in our consultant's judgment, plus it would not be prudent to forgo this
opportunity as a future installation because of the significant negative impact it would have on the
newly renovated field number four. Staff recommends that the Council approve funding this
alternate, which is actually a proposed 2007 CIP maintenance building project. Due to the
unexpectedly high bid results, staff is not recommending acceptance of the other two add -
alternates.
In an effort to reduce the total project costs, our consultants have contacted the low bidder, Rachel
Contracting, and has received written approval to agree to value engineering cost saving change
orders in the amount of $70,140. None of these value engineering deduct change orders would be in
violation of Building Codes and would not as a result require the building to have a fire suppression
system. With the value engineering change orders, the total project costs are reduced from
$905,007.00 down to $834,867. The CIP budget for this project is $762,000 which is $72,867 short
of needed funds. Therefore, I propose that the additional funding come from other 2006 CIP
projects that can be delayed:
Renovation of Chowen Park Picnic Shelter $15,000
Upgrade Keyless Entry System 20,000
Renovate Key /Core Security System 14,000
France Avenue Off -leash Dog Area 30,000
TOTAL $79,000
In staff's opinion, the renovation of the Chowen Park picnic shelter and upgrade of the keyless
entry system can wait until 2007. The renovation of the park system's key /core system can wait
indefinitely at the risk of unwanted entries into park buildings by a small number of people who
3
possess lost or non - returned keys. The France Avenue off -leash dog area cannot be done in 2006
anyway because the City of Minneapolis has not yet granted access to their property yet for that
proposed use. It is unsure when, if ever, access may be granted at this point.
J also anticipate additional savings via a donation from the Edina Rotary Club who have offered to
paint a portion of the building interior as a Rotary Club project.
The delay in the above 2006 CIP projects brings the total budgeted dollars available for this project
at:
2006 CIP Budget for Renovation of Shelter Building $450,000
2006 CIP Budget for Renovation of Field #4 312,000
Delay five other 2006 CIP budgeted projects (shown above) 79,000
TOTAL 2006 CIP BUDGETED DOLLARS $841,000
The total anticipated project costs are approximately $834,867. With value engineering change
orders and delay of other budgeted 2006 CIP projects, we should be able to fund total project costs.
If the Council approves the project, the building could be completed by the end of November 2006.
The field and building demolition/construction process would begin July 24, 2006, which would
allow enough time to get the newly graded little league baseball field seeded this fall. The field and
building projects must be done together to allow for access to the facility. This construction
schedule becomes the least disruptive for the baseball program season.
Our consultants suggest that delaying the award of bid for another year would likely only result in
higher costs due to inflation. Our consultants also suggest that there is virtually no other cost saving
design measure that would significantly reduce the scope of this project without eliminating a
proposed service or function that the building and field provide. The Edina Baseball Association
has already compromised their 2006 baseball schedule to accommodate the construction schedule.
If the project were delayed until 2007, EBA would have to compromise another season's schedule.
Over the past 5 years the Edina Baseball Association has spent $73,611 on field improvements and
maintenance related to the fields and concession area. Also over the past 5 years, Edina Baseball
Association has paid $76,170 in Field Use Fees and an additional $25,486 for Tournament Field
Fees. In total, the Edina Baseball Association has paid nearly $150,000 in support of Edina Park
and Recreation Department baseball facilities that they use. Since the inception of the Courtney
Fields Complex, the Edina Baseball Association has donated all proceeds from the concessions
stand and scoreboard advertising to the City of Edina to support and improve baseball facilities.
The Edina Baseball Association has agreed to formalize that practice in a written agreement.
If the Council approves the low bid as proposed, the building would be complete by the end of
November and Courtney Field #4 would be playable by mid - summer of 2007.
Project Manager and Landscape Architect Roy Anderson and ATS &R Architect Tammy Magney
will be present to explain value engineering change orders and answer questions.
Edina Park and Recreation
John K os, Director Department
e
not within budg
ordon Hu , ty Manager
This Recommended bid is
within budget
D.ezL.
July 14, 2006
John Keprios
Parks & Recreation. Department
City of Edina
4801 West 50`" Street
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
Dear John,
ANDERSON - JOHNSON I
ASSOCIATES, A
INC. � S
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • SITE PLANNING • CIVIL ENGINEERING
This letter outlines the Courtney Field project development history and suggestion to accept the low bidder.
Please refer to the following:
HISTORY
Preliminary Building Project Cost Estimate (see attached)
$413,849
Scope Increase During Construction Documents
• Sliding window wall system + 25,000
• Concession cabinetry and islands + 5,000
• Low maintenance grand concrete block units in lobby (no painting required) + 4,000
• Ceramic tile walls throughout toilet rooms (no painting required) + 4,000
• Quarry tile floor in lobby + 4,200
Items Not Identified in Preliminary Estimate
• Safety netting + 12,000
Site Work +250,000
Total Construction Estimate $726,049
BID
Low bidder - Rachel Contracting bid of: $809,963 *(9% higher than construction estimate.)
*It has been our experience that 2006 spring and summer estimates are 5 %, -10% higher than anticipated.
REDUCTION SUGGESTIONS:
The following deducts have been offered by the Low Bidder:
1.
Revise steel trusses to wood
$22,500
2.
Omit east canopy
$24,400
3.
Omit frost foundation at dugout use thickened edge slab
$7,100
4.
Delete grand concrete masonry units, use regular concrete
masonry units with epoxy paint
$12,000
5.
Delete SSPC #25 type 1 or 11 paint spec and
use standard prime paint for all structure steel members
$1,190
6.
Delete galvanized finish on exterior stair, use standard prime
painted material
$2,100
7.
Electrical modification
850
Total Suggested Reductions - $70,140
VALLEY SQUARE OFFICE CENTER • SUITE 200 • 7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD • MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55427
PHONE (763) 544 -7129 • FAx (763) 544 -0531
.- v
ANDERSON - JOHNSON
ASSOCIATES, INC. `A-V'
SUGGESTED AWARD: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • SITE PLANNING • CIVIL ENGINEERIN
We suggest you give positive consideration to awarding a contract to Rachel Construction. We have had
positive experience working with Jerry Rachel of Rachel. Construction and find no cause to justify rejection.
We suggest you award this contract for the $809,963.00 low bid with the understanding that the contract
price will be reduced by change order an amount of $70,140.
SUGGESTED ALTERNATE:
Alternate No. 1: Water and Sanitary Service Extension: Add $18,500
This alternate is for extension of sanitary sewer and water service to a future maintenance facility. This is
a very good alternate bid. In our judgement, it would be imprudent to forgo this oportunity as future
installation would have a very disruptive impact of the Site.
ATS &R
Tammy Magney
SSOCIA TES, 17VC
VALLEY SQUARE OFFICE CENTER • SUITE 200 • 7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD • MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55427
PHONE (763) 544 -7129 • FAx (763) 544 -0531
o e
C
lase
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Debra Mangen
City Clerk
Date: July 18, 2006
Subject: Resolution Receiving
Donations
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
Agenda Item # V. A.
Consent
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends F-1 To HRA
® To Council
Action ® Motion
Resolution
Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Recommendation:
Adopt Resolution.
Info/Background:
In order to comply with State Statutes all donations to the City must be adopted by a
resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I
have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the
recipient departments for your consideration. There has been an addition to the
donation resolution since your packet was sent to you.
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-72
ACCEPTING DONATIONS
ON BEHALF OF THE
CITY OF EDINA
City of Edina
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal
property for the benefit of its citizens;
WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds
majority of its members.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the
following listed donations on behalf of its citizens.
Donation to the Edina Fire Department:
William & Deidre Hedrick
$50 David Byron Memorial
Donations to the Edina Park and Recreation Department:
Edina Crime Fund $5,000
Edina Community Foundation $3,841*
Edina Community Foundation $5,000 **
*$2,000 for sponsoring the Centennial Lakes Park Sunday concert series and $1,841 Rosland Grant
In -Aid Program
**$5,000 not to be exceeded for three flag poles at Courtney Fields.
Donations to the Edina Art Center as follows:
Inna K. Hays $10
Laura Beth Landy $73
Jon C. Lord $10
Donation to City of Edina of various parcels in Parkwood Knolls from Parkwood Knolls Construction
Company for use as storm water ponds.
Dated: July 18, 2006
Attest:
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing
Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 18, 2006 and as recorded in the Minutes of said
Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and sea] of said City this day of . 20_.
City Hall
4801 WEST 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394
www.cityofedina.com
952C9r**-*861
FAX 952 - 826 -0390
TTY 952 - 826 -0379
t1�TA, a�
�4( I'M MEMORANDUM
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
' CITY OF EDINA
DATE: July 13, 2006
TO: Gordon Hughes — City Manager
FROM: Wayne Houle - City Engineer — .
SUBJECT: Parkwood Knolls Land — Pond Donations
Attached is a letter from Carl M. Hansen, President of Parkwood Knolls Construction
Company regarding the donation of out lots to the City of Edina within the Parkwood Knolls
neighborhood. These out lots are currently storm water ponds within the neighborhood, see
attach map. Parkwood Knolls Construction Company will draft the proper documentation to
transfer title for these properties, once the City Council accepts these donations.
Engineering along with the Utility Department recommends accepting these donations.
Jun 15 06 05:08P HHNSEN COMPANIES 9529129897 •?
Parkwood Km'W Edina, nN 5 436
Edina, MN 65438
952 - 912.9895
Consftction Compimy 952- 912 -9897 fax
June 15, 2006
Wayne D. Houle, PE
Director of Public Works / City Engineer
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Wayne:
Attached are parcels of land owned by our company that we would like to donate to the City.
PID#30 -117 21 -31 -0056 Market Value $100.00
PID#31 -117 21- 140033 Market Value $2500.00
PID#31- 117 -21 -12 -0031 Market Value $1800.00
PID#31- 117 -21- 13-0008 Market Value $1800.00
PID#31 -117 21 21 -0032 Market Value $2500.00
PID#31 -117 21- 14-0007 Market Value $2500.00
We would like to use these market values from the Hennepin County records.
Sin ly,
Carl M. Hansen
President
:rj :0T1 *Nor*
o� e
\�CORPOPST
tees
AGENDA ITEM V.B.
SEA' HEARING DATE- 8/1/06
NEW INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE -
EDINA GRILL
Z No packet data
❑ Oral presentation
❑ Information coming
owe \&N
rode
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
MAYOR AND COUNCIL
Agenda Item
V.C.
From:
GORDON L. HUGHES
Consent
❑
CITY MANAGER
Information Only
❑
Date:
JULY l8, 2006
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
®
To Council
Subject:
BIKEWAY TASK FORCE
®
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize staff to secure consulting services for the Bikeway Task Force.
INFORMATION /BACKGROUND :
On July 5a1, the City Council discussed the possibility of establishing a Bikeway Task
Force for the purpose of preparing a comprehensive bikeway plan. The Council asked
Mr. Steve Rusk, an Edina resident, to return at the July 18th meeting with additional
thoughts concerning the mission of the task force as well as prospective members. The
Council also asked that I share thoughts concerning staffing the task force.
After reviewing this with my staff, I suggest that the Council authorize us to arrange for
consulting services to assist the task force with its work. I believe that a consultant is the
most appropriate staffing method for a number of reasons: First, this task force is very
similar in concept and make up as the Affordable Housing Task Force, i.e. a task force
that is self- appointing and responsible for crafting its own mission. In the case of the
Affordable Housing Task Force, we concluded that it would be best served by assigning
I
an independent consultant to assist with this project rather than City staff. In retrospect,
that was the correct decision for that task force and I believe it is the appropriate
method. for the Bikeway Task Force. Second, our staff resources are stretched with
comprehensive plan issues, traffic studies, construction projects and other efforts. We
are also short - handed in the Planning Department. We simply would find it difficult to
provide staff resources at the present time. Third, in my opinion, the City would be
best - served in reserving staff involvement until the task force has completed its work.
We can then spend our effort on the implementation program as well as integrating the
task force's recommendations into the comprehensive plan.
As with the Affordable Housing Task Force, we would assist the Bikeway Task Force in
securing consulting services. I anticipate that task force members would be responsible
for interviewing prospective consultants and recommending their choice. I cannot
estimate the cost of such consulting services at the present time. We will advise the
Council of expected costs after the task force refines its scope of work.
BIKE EDINA
r +,- FORCE
Purpose — produce a Comprehensive Bike Plan for Edina.
Scope -
• Consider the needs for A — advanced riders, B — average and C — Novice skilled riders;
that are commuters, athletic /exercise, recreational, social, children riding to school and
shoppers.
• Address connectivity to other surrounding communities and trails.
• Coordinate plan with Hennepin County and Three Rivers Park District (3RPD) plans.
• Integrate all ongoing bike issues
• Explore Test programs with other agencies (3RPD, Mn /DOT, etc.)
Goals - short term
• Compete Route elements in time for '07 TAB and `07Non- motorized Transportation
Pilot Project (NTP) to apply for grants.
Time Frame — complete in 9 —12 months for complete plan
- Proposed Plan Elements
Route elements —
Street Inventory / Inventory of conditions — This is a key element that allows an
understanding of current conditions from a cycling perspective.
Attractors — Defining attractors /destination locations that cyclists currently or wish
to cycle to, help to set priority in the development of routes.
Define needed routes —
• Safe Routes to Schools —
■ Community Routes —
■ Connectors to other municipalities —
Estimate route costs — Mn /DOT website can produce estimates for prioritization
Produce prioritized route need list.
Policy elements —
■ The Rationale for non - motorized transportation planning
■ Bicycle planning process
■ Defining users
■ Deterrents to cycling
■ Increasing usage of cycles for transportation.
Define BE Task force.doc Page 1 of 4
BIKE EDINA
c
TASK FORCE
Management elements
■ Administration
■ Pubic participation — define long term input
• Promotion — of infrastructure
• Encouragement — use of bikes trails
• Information — provide knowledge for use of bikes and routes
• Coordination with other municipalities
• Commuter Elements —
• Skills and Equipment Education
• . Employer Education /Promotion
• Training
Education /Safety (Risk) elements —
• Education programs (cyclist, pedestrian and motorist)
• Maps of Routes for residents.
• Enforcement
• Accident reporting
■ Regulations(State and Local)
Network design elements --- thane- pa-th-and -route standards
• Federal
• AASHTO
• Mn /DOT
• Local requirements
Parking elements — are defined parking standards that have extreme impact on cycling
usage.
Transit elements — define how cycling integrates as a formal transit element, would
address transit stations for high volume destinations. .
Maintenance elements — defines a local municipalities maintenance philosophy toward
the defined cycling infrastructure.
Funding —
• Develop Grant writing skills and information
• Determine Grant sources
• Match Needs to Grants
Task Force Staffing
Define BE Task force.doc Page 2 of 4
. EDINA
TASK FORCE
We need to Communicate this Task Force to the public. Promotion of the Task Force will
allow for quality staffing, increase public awareness and participation over all.
To get this Task Force off the ground we need to utilize the Sun Current to publishing an
interview or article that explains the purpose and scope of the Task Force. Ask for
volunteers. Have them e-mail BikeEdina a,earthlink.net.
Post the same information with forms at bike shops, coffee shops, Lund's, Jerry's and other
community areas to inform public.
Public Involvement Opportunities
Help with —
Street Inventory
• Volunteers to ride possible bike routes
• Record data
Neighborhood Meetings and City wide Meetings.
We need resident and non - resident comments and opinions on the following —
Bike use
■ Obstacles to cycling
■ What would you like to know about cycling that would help you use
your bike more.
■ What help /information would you like to help you commute to work
Riding
• Routes /Roads Used
• Issues with riding, condition of road, signage, accessibility
• Desired Routes (if you could create a new path)
Attractors
• Identify
• Prioritize
Task Force —
• Voting body
• That will be active for the complete 9 —12 month process
Volunteer Form
The Bike Edina Task Force needs citizen involvement. We need help from all levels of
cyclists. We will publish a press release in the Sun Current, post flyers in bike shops, and
high traffic business in Edina asking for volunteers. Please see attached Form
Selection Committee
I'm forming an ad hock selection committee that will review the applicants and provide the
Mayor with a pool of qualified people that he can then appoint to the Task Force with
Council approval.
Define BE Task force doc Page 3 of 4
v
o BIKE EDINA
TASK FORCE
At this time the Selection Committee is:
Bob Kuntze
Troy Jefferson - Former Edina Citizens' Safety Council participant regarding bicycle issues
Dick Dekker _
Lee Ann Gustafson
I have as of 4:30 pm Thursday July 13, 2006 received 5 e -mail contacts from very qualified
people from today's Sun Current
Bike Edina Task Force — Voting body
1. Chair / Cycling Expert
2. NW Citizen Representative
3. NE Citizen Representative
4. SW Citizen Representative
5. SE Citizen Representative
6. At Large Citizen Representative
7. At Large Citizen Representative
8. At Large Citizen Representative
9. At Large Citizen Representative
10. At Large Citizen Representative
11. Traffic Commission Representative?
12. City Council person?
Internal and External Liaisons /Advisors that will assist on parts.
1. Edina Comprehensive Transportation Plan Coordinator - Heather Worthington?
2. City Engineer - Steve Lillehaug ?(Currently liaison to the Traffic Commission)
3. Public Safety /Police
4. Public Health?
5. Planning Commission
6. Mn /DOT A Representative from MN DOT Bicycling Area — Darryl Anderson MN
DOT Bicycle Coordinator or Jim Dustrude, former MN DOT Bicycling Coordinator
and currently Principal Transportation Strategist will be the one to assign someone
to this task force if it is not one of them attending.
7. Three Rivers Park District A Representative from Three Rivers Park District — Del
Miller, Intergovernmental Relations Administrator would recommend a person if he
can not attend.
8. Safe Routes to School — a program sponsored federal government
9. Maintenance Department /Public Works
10. Park / Recreation
11. Communications
12. School Board
13. and. others
Define BE Task force.doc Page 4 of 4
Name
EDINA
COMPREHENSIVE BIKE PLAN
TASK FORCE - VOLUNTEER FORM
Please compete the following form.
Address Zip Code
*Phone: Home
E -mail
Resident (number of years)
Employment (firm and occupation /profession)
Civil, professional, community activities
Work
Previous public Experience (Elective or Appointive)
Education
On the reverse or on additional paper please answer the following.
1) Why are you interested serving on the Bicycle Task Force?
2) Briefly list aspects of your skills /experiences that you believe quality you for this
Task force.
3) In what capacity would you like to participate?
❑ - Steering Committee (9 -12 month time commitment)
❑ - Helping Coordinate Neighborhood Meetings (few, day commitment)
❑ - Attend Neighborhood meetings (evening commitment)
❑ - Help with Street Condition Inventory (few day commitment)
❑ - Other
Date
Signature
Return completed form via e-mail to BikeEdina&earthlink.net ,
or mail to Steven Rusk, 5040 Hankerson Ave, Edina MN 55436.
* Under the law, your telephone number is private data. If you are selected to serve, your telephone number(s) will be
listed on the Task Force roster so other members of the Task Force, City officials and the public could contact you.
There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information.
BE Volunteer formdoc Page 1 of 1
ATTENTION EDINA
BICYCLISTS...
The Edina City Council has approved a
Bicycling Task Force to. improve biking
routes in Edina. VOLUNTEERS NEEDED!
The Task Force will be headed by Steve Rusk, a bicycling expert from
Edina. The group will be made up of volunteers recruited from all four
quadrants of the city.
The Task Force's main mission is to produce a Comprehensive Bike
Plan.for Edina -- designing routes, improving the current conditions of
current widely -used routes, interact with surrounding cities to plan
routes that provide good bicycling connectivity and address the pro
-
.Posed Interlachen Blake Trail.
Volunteers are needed to spend a few hours to attend meetings and
help in planning, organizing and fact- finding.
We are also looking for a few people to form a Task Force to oversee the
planning process. The planning process will take about 9 -12 months.
If you are interested in cycling and would like to make a positive impact
on cycling routes in the City of Edina, please email us at
BikeEdina@earthlink.net for more information or to request a
volunteer form.
CDMQ)
CDmin
coM0)
comin
oom!'n
oomin
oomin
oomin
Wmin
ODm(,n
LM: (D
� (D
a (D
7� °_: (D
°: E
and
m00) m
m� m
m� m
m� m
m�
MW m
m�
and
m� n
c�
aaD�
° oo�
° oD�
° aD�
° aD�
c�D
aao�
°=oo�
° oD�
c`n
° oD�
r,-L
001 N
N
m N
N N
N N
001 N
N N
N
j� C
��X
@�7C
��7C
��X
��7r
@�7C
��7C
��7C
��7C
@ 7C
(D O
(D 0a
(D N
(D 0a
(D 01
(D 01
(D 01
(D 01
(D 01
(D 01
01 rya
N y
0) rya
01 y
01 rya
0a (A
N (p
0) rya
O y
d N
=r -n
?T
?-n
S-n
?-n
?-n
19
?-n
?-n
?-n
5.0
O
O
O
O
50
0
0
5 O
O
?!rS
?r C-3
Fa
?Ir a
Fa
?rd
FC-3
a
0 O
(0D 0
(0D 0
(D (D
(D O
(0D 0
N O
(0D W
(D m
(D O
I
Page 1 of 1
Darlene Wallin
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 12:53 PM
To: Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com
Cc: Darlene Wallin
Subject: FW: Message to the City Council Re: High rise development along France Avenue
Jennifer Bennerotte
Communications & Marketing Director
City of Edina
952 - 833 -9520
FAX 952 - 826 -0390
Bennerotte@ci.edina.mn.us
From: Lorenzo Tunesi [mailto:lorenzo.tunesi @gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 10:45 AM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: Re: Message to the City Council Re: High rise development along France Avenue
Dear Members of the City Council,
Thank you for your continued interest in bike paths in Edina. The creation of a Bikeway Task Force is a
step in the right direction. Please keep moving in the direction of bike paths in Edina, they are an
amenity that is sorely lacking in our city.
Lorenzo Tunesi
4413 Ellsworth Drive
Edina, MN 55435
7/18/2006
o e
Cl)
0
�NC'OJ PO
Sao
REPORPRECOMMENDATION
To:
MAYOR AND COUNCIL
Agenda Item
# V.D.
From:
CHERYL ENGELMAN
Consent
❑
CITY SANITARIAN
Information Only
Date:
July 18, 2006
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
®
To Council
Subject:
Above Ground
❑
Motion
Swimming Pools
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
INFORMATION
In 1979 the City Council adopted an ordinance prohibiting above ground swimming pools. This ordinance
was reviewed by Council at the November 3, 2003, December 2, 2003 and March 1, 2004 Council
meetings due to a variance request to allow above ground swimming pools. The variance request was
denied and the ordinance remained unchanged. Pertinent excerpts from the minutes of these council
meetings and staff reports are attached. City Code defines a swimming pool as any basin for holding
water, designed for human use, and with a water depth greater than 24 inches.
During the July 5, 2006 Council meeting, a resident, who recently received a correction letter to remove
an above ground pool from their property, requested that the ordinance be changed to allow above ground
pools. The resident indicated that new technology for above ground pools should be considered. Council
requested staff to review current technology and report back.
Staff from both health and building departments reviewed current technology of above ground swimming
pools and found it unchanged from that reviewed by Council three years ago. If the Council wishes to
reconsider City policies concerning above ground swimming pools, it should direct staff to prepare an
ordinance amendment for Council consideration at a later date.
Minutes/Edina City Council/November 3, 2003
Member Hovland commented he did not think that matching the sidewalk to the other side of the
street was a concern and could work.
Member Masica said the issue was child safety. She inquired about the installation of flashing
lights at the intersection. Mr. Houle explained the City's crosswalk policy had recently been
updated to include flashing lights at a couple locations in the City. The intersection would not
meet warrants at this time for a flashing signal. Member Masica said the park at this time seems
to be an attractive nuisance.
Mr. Bongaarts voiced his concern with STOP signs at this location that so little traffic from Fox
Meadow, that the STOP could not guarantee an expectation of safety.
Bernie Beaver, 6225 Fox Meadow Lane, stated, 1) Blake Road was the longest stretch of road in
Edina without STOP signs or lights and the fastest speeds, 2) Fox Meadow was only four
cornered intersection on the subject stretch of Blake Road, 3) Blake Road rises immediately north
of the intersection obstructing the view, 4) completion of the park has changed the semantics of
the neighborhood with more people walking to the park, 5) favors sidewalks, which would
encourage more pedestrian traffic, 6) installation of landscaping on intersection has improved
sightlines, and 7) the person objecting to sidewalks in the area was no longer living in the
neighborhood.
Member Kelly stated there needed to be some uniformity with the warrant system wherever
pedestrians are crossing to City parks and schools.
Member Housh indicated a good 'first task' for the Transportation Committee would be to study
the warrant system, specifically in the areas of City parks and schools.
Alison Gregory, 6200 Fox Meadow Lane, submitted a letter dated October 21, 2003, stated a STOP
sign at that location was not justified and will only increase traffic noise and become a nuisance.
Member Hovland made a motion approving the Minutes of the October 6, 2003, Traffic Safety
Staff Review Section A; B and C. Member Housh seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold
Motion carried.
Following a Council discussion, Member Hovland made a motion directing staff to study a
pedestrian sidewalk on Blake Road and to connect Interlachen Boulevard to Parkwood
Avenue on both sides of the street. Member Maetzold seconded the motion..
Ayes: Housh Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold
Motion carried.
APPEAL OF CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION UPHELD FOR ABOVE
GROUND SWIMMING POOL (5601 MCGUIRE ROAD) Assistant Manager Anderson gave
background into the complaint regarding the above ground swimming pool located at 5601
McGuire Road. Edina City Code specifically prohibits above ground pools with water depth over
24 inches. As a result of that complaint, Tim and Judy Chirpich were notified of the violation and
given the option to appeal the violation with the Construction Board of Appeals. That
information was incorrect direction to give the residents at 5601 McGuire Road. Mr. Anderson
Page 7
M
} �1
Minutes/Edina City Council/November 3, 2003
elaborated that the Construction Board of Appeals does not have the authority to grant a variance
for this type of violation. The Construction Board of Appeals examines interpretations made by
the sanitarian and building official, related to the City Code. Everyone was in agreement that the
above ground pool at 5601 McGuire Road was not in compliance. Options available are, 1) deny
the appeal and 2) after study of the existing ordinance, consider a change to the Code related to
the soft sided pools.
Gerald Robinson, neighbor of the Chirpich family, stated his belief that there was ambiguity in
the Edina City Code. Attorney Gilligan explained the issue began with an appeal. process but the
Construction Board of Appeals did not have jurisdiction. He recommended upholding the
decision of the Board and denying the appeal. Mr. Gilligan added the Council could- decide to
study this portion of the Code if they desired to do so. Mr. Robinson said he believed the
Chirpichs were challenging the Code regarding pools as well as play structures, etc. that was
passed in 1979, based upon aesthetics.
Building Official Kirchman explained the Board directed a memorandum to the Council asking
that the 1979 Ordinance be studied to see if changes were warranted.
Member Hovland made a motion upholding the decision of the Construction Board of
Appeals denying the variance allowing an above ground swimming pool that was specifically
prohibited by the City Code. Member Housh seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold
Motion carried.
Mayor Maetzold inquired if the Council wanted the Code to be studied and the results reported
back to the Council at a later date. He explained the process to be followed would be, 1) staff
studying the issue, 2) reporting results of the study to the Council with recommendations, 3)
publish the issue, and 4) set a public hearing for resident comments at a Council meeting.
Member Masica asked if the 1979 Code regarding above ground pools was based on aesthetics or
safety issues. Mr. Kirchman explained no verbatim minutes existed from 1979. However, several
staff members recalled an incident precipitating the Ordinance, which was purely aesthetics.
Chief Scheerer said the Fire Department does consider pools of this type a risk and a safety
concern if a rescue was needed. DepaztmTktHtaff added it would be below ground pools from to step over the side
where there was a large stable area to
and into a pool with an unknown depth.
Member Housh queried if pools of this type were acceptable in other communities.
Member Hovland voiced concern with, 1) how do you keep the water clean, 2) how do you get
rid of the water, 3) how are little neighborhood children kept out, and 4) how do little children
get out of the pool.
Mr. Anderson reminded the Council that the concern was complaint driven.
Mayor Maetzold suggested further discussions and study of the Ordinance on the use of above
ground pools.
Pnap R
_ Jrt Minutes/Edina City Council/November 3, 2003
Member Kelly said he personally would not have staff study the issue. He voiced concern with,
1) no fencing, 2) small children in the neighborhood, 3) night time safety, and 4) water quality. He
stated he would not be in favor of changing the ordinance.
Member Masica said information she was provided in the packet stated that the pool was
designed to be filled to a maximum level of 30 inches.
Member Hovland said the Ordinance has not been studied for 25 years and staff should study the
local and standards nation -wide for above ground pools.
Mr. Anderson said staff would study the issue and report back to Council with their findings and
recommendations.
APPEAL OF CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION UPHELD FOR
SWIMMING POOL LADDER Mr. Kirchman explained when a final inspection was completed
for the in- ground pool at 6301 South Knoll Drive, it was noted that no ladder was installed in the
pool. The homeowners were sent a letter dated July. 29, 2002, of this violation stating: 'The
swimming pool must have two means of egress from the pool. Steps may be used in the shallow
end of the pool. A ladder with handrails must be located at the deep end of the pool ". Mr.
Kirchman reported the homeowners, David and Connie Brockway, appealed this decision with
the Construction Board of Appeals. He concluded the Construction Board of Appeals
recommended upholding the denial of the request for the deletion of an egress ladder in the deep
end of the applicant's swimming pool.
Member Masica asked if the ladder was noted during the course of the plan review and brought
to the attention of the pool builder. Mr. Kirchman said yes the builder, Quality Pools, was
familiar in with Edina Ordinances.
Connie Brockway, 6301 South Knoll Drive, explained the.pool was completed in June 2003. Upon
final inspection was the first time installation of a ladder was mentioned to them or the builder
about a ladder being necessary. Installing a ladder now would be very expensive. She added that
money and aesthetics were not a substitute for safety. They polled surrounding cities and
Bloomington was the only polled city that required a ladder or a swim -out from the deep end of
the pool. Ms. Brockway said an internet search of the whole country was completed and the most
restrictive codes required either a ladder, a swim -out or a projecting bull-nose around the pools
perimeter. She concluded that if they had known a ladder was a requirement, they would have
installed one.
Member Kelly stated there would be no financial consequence to the homeowners, but the
builder would be responsible. He suggested the City notice the builder about the violation and
subsequent necessity of a ladder. Mr. Anderson stated that staff would notice the builder of the
requirement.
David Brockway, 6301 South Knoll Drive, suggested studying the ladder issue when the City
Code was studied about above ground, soft -sided pools.
Mr. Kirchman added that a ladder in the deep end of a pool was a rescue aid in case of
emergencies.
Page 9
r r
Minutes/Edina City Council/November 3, 2003
Member Hovland made a motion to deny the appeal requesting the deletion of an egress
ladder in the deep end of applicant's swimming pool. Member Kelly seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold
Motion carried.
APPROVE AUTHORIZATION OF STATE OF MINNESOTA GRANT CONTRACT FOR
DOMESTIC PREPAREDNESS TRAINING Member Masica asked that the Authorization of
State of Minnesota Grant Contract for Domestic Preparedness Training be removed from the
Consent Agenda for further information. Member Masica inquired whether this was the first
phase of the grant and just a tabletop exercise. Chief Siitari responded that this grant informs first
line supervisors about the ability to format strategies.
Member Masica made a motion approving the grant contract between the State of Minnesota,
Division of Emergency, Management, and the City of Edina for Domestic Preparedness
Training Funds. Member Housh seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold
Motion carried.
*CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Member Masica made a motion and Member Hovland
seconded the motion approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the
Check Register dated October 22, 2003, and consisting of 25 pages: General Fund $66,349.44;
Communications Fund $11,664.23; Working Capital Fund $964,262.53; Construction Fund
$1,522.68; Art Center Fund $3,172.36; Golf Course Fund $22,040.86; Ice Arena Fund $935.02;
Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $7,773.00; Liquor Fund $168,070.94; Utility Fund
$32,221.61; Storm Sewer Fund $4,110.56; PSTF Agency Fund $23,323.01; TOTAL $1,305,446.24;
and for approval of payment of claims dated October 29, 2003, and consisting of 30 pages:
General Fund $318,638.04; CDBG Fund $2,746.00; Communications Fund $10,473.47; Working
Capital Fund $196,890.17; Construction Fund $2,226.80; Art Center. Fund $22,498.63; Aquatic
Center ($114.49); Golf Course Fund $2,811.80; Ice Arena Fund $4,153.28;
Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $9,449.88; Liquor Fund $117,057.96; Utility Fund
$316,764.05; Storm Sewer Fund $22,314.27; PSTF Agency Fund $234,225.13; TOTAL
$1,260,134.89.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
COMMUNICATION RECEIVED Mayor Maetzold explained that recently, a letter, dated
October 24, 2003, was received from James A. Vose, 4529 Casco Avenue relating to a sewer back-
up that occurred last July. Manager Hughes drafted a letter in response to Mr. Vose. Council
consensus was that the draft letter depicted the City's reasoning and should be submitted to Mr.
Vose.
No formal Council action was taken.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Maetzold declared the meeting
adjourned at 9:50 P.M.
City Clerk
Pa oP 10
L` .ne�c. 2, 2003 Edina City Council Meeting Minutes Page 7 of 20
appointed to serve on the Commission at their next meeting.
Mayor Maetzold made a motion appointing the previously slate of candidates to the Transportation
Commission for terms as presented. Member Kelly seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold
Motion carried.
AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT - YORKDALE SHOPPES
PARTNERSLCITY OF EDINA, APPROVED Manager Hughes indicted in 1996, the City and Yorkdale
Shoppes Partners entered into a Reciprocal Easement Agreement with respect to the construction the
new York Avenue Liquor Store, Cub Store and Retail Center, located to the south of the Cub Store. The
Easement Agreement provided that no restaurant could be located in the retail center that sold
alcoholic beverages. The restriction was imposed by the private interest in the Easement Agreement,
not the City of Edina.
Yorkdale Shoppes Partners is now requesting that the City consent to an amendment removing the
above noted restriction. This amendment is requested to allow Chipotle, a new restaurant in the retail
center, to be eligible for a liquor license.
The City of Edina did not require the subject restriction at the time the Agreement was negotiated,
there is no reason why the requested amendment should not be approved.
Following a brief Council exchange, Member Kelly made a motion authorizing execution of the
Reciprocal Easement Agreement by and between Yorkdale Shoppes Partners, LLC and the City of
Edina, with respect to construction of the new York Avenue Liquor Store, Cub Store and Retail
Center, located south of the Cub Store. Member Hovland seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold
Motion carried.
REPORT PRESENTED ON RESIDENTIAL SWIMMING POOLS Sanitarian Velde explained at the
November 3, 2003, Council meeting, two appeals were heard from the Edina Residential Swimming
Pool Code; 1) denial of a variance from the Construction Board of Appeals allowing an above ground
swimming pool; and 2) denial of variance allowing a "swim -out" as a means of egress from the deep
end of a swimming pool in lieu of a .ladder. The Council denied the appeal for the above ground
swimming pool on the basis that the appeal to the Construction Board of Appeals was improper and
should not have gone before the Council. In addition, the Council denied the appeal of a variance for
the swim -out in lieu of a ladder.
Mr. Velde said the Council directed staff to review both appeals and report back to the Council to
consider amending the Code on both matters. The Council requested specific information on 1)
definition of a swimming pool; 2) safety; 3) aesthetics; 4) sanitation; and 5) rescue.
Surrounding cities do not have as stringent regulations on residential pools as does Edina.
Bloomington has the most similar regulations of the cities surveyed. The remaining communities
regulate the location of the pool and require four foot high fencing as a barrier around the pool but do
not regulate the design or construction of residential swimming pools.
Edina City Code defines a swimming pool as "any basin for holding water, designed for human use,
http: / /www.ci. edina. mn. us / Pages/ CityCouncil _Meetingminutes /20031202Reg.htm 7/10/2006
Dec. 2, 2003 Edina City Council Meeting Minutes
Page 8 of 20 •
with a water depth greater than 24 inches". Surrounding communities and the National Spa and Pool
Institute (NSPI) Model Code includes a water depth greater than 24 inches as a basis for their definition
of a swimming pool.
Safe - Hopkins does not require fencing around residential swimming pools. NSPI addresses fencing
as an option.
Deckin - Edina and Bloomington require decking. NSPI model codes address decking as an option.
Egress - Edina, Bloomington and Minneapolis require a means of egress from the deep end of pools.
NSPI model codes address a means of egress from the deep end of the pool, such as; 1) ladder with
handrails, 2) swim -out, 3) underwater seats and benches, 4) mechanical lifts; and 5) any other design
providing egress.
Sanitation - Edina and Bloomington require a circulation system.
Rescue - Code requires a four -foot wide deck around the perimeter of a pool for accessibility to
perform emergency procedures and store backboards and a gurney.
Above Ground Swimming Pools - Edina's Code prohibits above ground pools. NSPI defines an above
ground pool as "a removable pool that has a minimum depth of thirty-six inches (36 ") and a maximum
water depth of forty-eight inches (48 ") at the wall". NSPI model code requires, 1) same circulation
system, 2) water depth between 24 and 36 inches, and 3) provide same level of safety and sanitation as
in- ground pools. Mr. Velde elaborated that above - ground pools pose same risk for children 0 - 4 years
as in- ground pools.
Mr. Velde concluded that provision for a swim -out at the deep end of the swimming pool in lieu of a
ladder is allowed in NSPI model codes. Neighboring communities do not require a ladder at the deep
end of the pool and based upon the information gathered regarding the issue, it would seem
appropriate to allow other forms of egress from the deep end of swimming pools.
Above ground swimming pools that meet the model code set forth in the NSPI standards would meet
the safety and sanitation requirement set forth for in- ground swimming pools. The need for a deck
around the perimeter of the above ground swimming pool is warranted for safety and rescue purposes.
This would add to the mass of the above ground swimming pool and may have an impact on the lot
coverage of a residential property.
Staff recommends the following actions:
1. Amend City Code Section 450 regulating residential swimming pools to include swim -
outs, underwater benches and seats as a means of egress from the deep end of the
swimming pool.
2. Seek input from the public whether to amend the City Code to allow above ground
swimming pools with a water depth of 36 inches or greater.
3. Not allow the use of above ground swimming pools that have a design water depth
between 24 inches and 36 inches due to the lack of model standards for the design and
construction of such pools.
4. Consider amending City Code Section 450 by reducing the requirement for a continuous
deck around the perimeter of the swimming pool thereby allowing the installation of a
"vanishing edge" feature on a swimming pool.
Consideration may also be given to adopting less regulation for residential swimming pools. The
Dec. 2, 2003 Edina City Council Meeting Minutes Page 9 of 20
minimum requirements should include fencing around the swimming pool and a building permit
ensuring that the proposed pool meets the setback requirements set forth in the Zoning Ordinance.
Mr. Housh asked what NSPI stands for, and voiced concern that it is a mechanism to help contractors.
Mr. Velde said NSPI is the Nation Spa and Pool Institute and may be a trade organization but their
model codes incorporate all the features found in the Edina Pool Ordinance. Mr. Housh inquired if
communities that were surveyed had recently amended their ordinances regarding pools. Mr. Velde
noted that that was not made clear with the survey but Edina historically has had a large number of
pools for many years while other communities have not had the interest in regulating them as closely
as we do. Mr. Housh said a swim out should be readily recognizable for a person having a problem in
the pool.
Mr. Hovland inquired whether Edina regulates what size a pool might be. Mr. Velde responded that
when a diving board is included in the pool, there are stringent rules. Mr. Hovland indicated concern
that pools have enough swim outs for persons who might have a problem. Mr. Velde said current Code
states if the pool is over 30 feet wide, two means of egress are required in the deep end.
Mr. Kelly said having a swim -out in the deep end of the pool is fine but he believes it is easier to see a
ladder. He inquired whether there is a compelling reason to change the ordinance.
Ms. Masica suggested more information be obtained before a decision is made. She asked how fencing
is installed around a vanishing edge pool. Mr. Velde said fencing would surround the entire pool.
Mr. Hughes suggested preparing an amendment dealing with the vanishing edge pool and the swim -
out /ladder issue in residential pools. The above ground pool issue would not be a part of the
amendment.
No formal Council action was taken.
*CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Member Hovland made a motion and Member Housh
seconded the motion approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check
Register dated November 19, 2003, and consisting of 29 pages: General Fund $176,834.92,
Communications Fund $3,246.62; Working Capital Fund $1,088,644.43; Construction Fund $78,043.83,
Art Center Fund $2,161.68; Golf Dome Fund $6,670.98; Aquatic Center Fund $1,309.39; Golf Course
Fund 8,639.75$; Ice Arena Fund $27,129.97; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $24,265.61; Liquor
Fund $139,524.04; Utility Fund $352,135.90, Storm Sewer Fund $9,913.66; PSTF Agency Fund $935.35;
TOTAL $1,919,456.13; and for approval of payment of claims dated November 25, 2003, consisting of
29 pages: General Fund $161,240.95; Communication Fund $2,964.22; Working Capital Fund
$120,251.88; Art Center Fund $25,255.11; Golf Dome Fund $218.11; Aquatic Center Fund $1,701.00,
Golf Course Fund $2,688.90; Ice Arena Fund $470.85; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $6,523.18;
Liquor Fund $149,926.24; Utility Fund $40,456.49; PSTF Agency Fund $642.80; TOTAL $512,339.73.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
FIRST READING GRANTED FOR ORDINANCE NO. 2003-13 - AMENDING CODE SECTION 185
INCREASING CERTAIN FEES Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on
file.
Mr. Hughes noted that Ordinance No. 2003 -13 proposed an increase in on -sale liquor fees, thereby
requiring a public hearing.
http: / /www.ci. edina. mn. us / Pages/ CityCouncil _MeetingMinutes /20031202Reg.htm 7/10/2006
March 1, 2004 Edina laity Council Meeting minutes
I
rage i of i
FIRST READING GRANTED TO ORDINANCE NO. 2004-M - AMENDING EDINA CODE
SECTION 450 - RESIDENTIAL SWIMMING POOLS Community Health Administrator Velde
explained at the December 2, 2003, regular Council meeting, staff recommended amending the current
City Code regulating residential swimming pools. He said the amendment would allow the use of a
swimout or a bench as a means of egress from residential swimming pools and would allow for a
reduction in the required deck around the residential swimming pool thereby permitting certain
special features such as a vanishing edge pool or a waterfall.
Mr. Velde explained Section 1 of the proposed amendment defined underwater seats, benches and
swimouts. Section 2 of the proposed amendment would allow the application of a "vanishing edge" or
waterfall along a maximum of 15 feet of the required deck, or one entire side of the swimming pool if
the maximum depth of the residential swimming pool did not exceed 54 inches. Section 3 of the
proposed amendment would allow the installation of swimouts, seats or benches, which were visually
set apart, as a means of egress from a swimming pool in lieu of a ladder.
Mr. Velde said the proposed amendment would not change the prohibition on above ground
swimming pools in Edina. He recommended granting First Reading to Ordinance No. 2004 -01,
amending Code Section 450 regulating residential swimming pools.
Member Hovland asked if requiring a non -slip material to be used in the swimout was given
consideration. Mr. Velde noted that the ordinance stated that the swimout must be visually 'set apart'.
Member Masica asked how the 15 -foot maximum for the vanishing edge had been set. Mr. Velde
explained a 15 -foot vanishing edge should allow rescuers to help swimmers in trouble in front of that
vanishing edge because shepherd's poles were 12 feet long. Ms. Masica asked if a handrail was
required on pool steps. Mr. Velde replied a handrail was not required on the shallow end of the pool.
Member Housh asked if surrounding communities have as stringent rules for pools as Edina. Mr.
Velde said Edina's rules were more extensive.
Barry Cart, 4208 Branson Street, inquired about research on water depth as well as the length of the
diving well. Mr. Velde said the City Code has minimum distances from the diving wall out to the deep
point as well as a specific distance from the deep point to the first transition and then back up to the
shallow end. The model was taken from the National Spa and Pool Institute (NSPI).
Member Kelly made a motion granting First Reading to Ordinance No. 2004 -01, amending Code
Section 450 regulating residential swimming pools. Member Housh seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold
Motion carried.
http: / /www.ci. edina. mn. us / Pages /CityCouncil_MeetingMinutes /20040301 Reg.htm 7/10/2006
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Steve A. Kirchman
Building Official
Date: October 29, 2003
Subject: Discussion of City ordinance
prohibiting above - ground swimming pools.
Tim and Judy Chirpich. 5601 McGuire Rd.
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
Consent
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends
Action
0
LJ To HRA
® To Council
❑ Motion
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
® Discussion
Staff recommends City Code prohibition on above - ground swimming pools remain unchanged.
Other referenced play structures are a separate issue.
Info /Background:
The Construction Board of Appeals decided they didn't have the authority to grant a variance
allowing an above - ground swimming pool that is specifically prohibited by the City Code. The
attached memorandum from the City attorney supports the Board's position. The Board
expressed concern that the ordinance prohibiting above - ground pools has not been reviewed
since it passage in 1979, and requests the City Council review and discuss the ordinance.
Attachments: 10/10/02 appeal letter with submitted pictures
8/25/03 staff report with 8/19/03 Sanitarian memo and pictures
9/3/03 Construction Board of Appeals meeting minutes
9/29/03 staff report with 9/5/03 Fire Chief memo
9/29/03 Construction Board of Appeals meeting minutes
10/23/03 Construction Board of Appeals memo
10/24/03 City Attorney memo
Neighbor responses(2)
ECC 450.06, Subd. 11
G:\ ConstBd WppealsXBD03- 006,CBA03-01,5601 McGuireMSURpt -mundl
rw
Pete and Judy Chirpich
5601 McGuire Road
Edina, MN 55439
October 10, 2003
Debra Mangen, City Clerk
City of Edina
4801 West 50" Street
Edina, MN 55424
Re: Construction Board of Appeals File # CBA03 -01
Dear Ms. Mangen:
�O C1011IN CO-
S4e4� C'l�
°er I.
2003
BYSx �� y�O
We are appealing the Construction Board of Appeal's ( "CBA ") decision dated September 30,
2003, denying a variance to city code #450.06 regarding above ground swimming pools.
Overview
This case addresses the acceptability of a toddler pool purchased at a Target store in Edina. The
pool is soft - sided, 18' in diameter, 25.5" deep, holding approximately 4,000 gallons of water
which is passed through a continuously running filter. Edina Code #450.06 prohibits any above
ground pool that is 24" deep or greater. The code does not prohibit, limit the size of, or in any
other way regulate above ground pools that are less than 24" deep. In short, this case is about
1.5" of water.
Please take a moment to read the copy of my original letter of appeal to the CBA regarding this
issue. (Exhibit A)
Aesthetics
The ordinance prohibiting above ground swimming pools was adopted back in 1979 for purely
aesthetic reasons as stated in David Velde's memorandum to the CBA, dated August 19, 2003.
(Exhibit B) "Aesthetically appealing" is tied to a community's values and meant something
different in 1979 than what we consider now.
Edina residents strive to give opportunities for children to succeed, and one way to support this is
to start them off with recreational equipment that builds this confidence. This is why we now see
large trampolines and towering play sets in backyards all over the city. I have enclosed photos
(Exhibits C1 -C6) which were recently taken within a one mile radius of our home showing such
large trampolines and play structures that also would have been considered aesthetically
unappealing back in 1979. We believe that our toddler pool is no more unsightly than the
towering play sets or trampolines which have proliferated in recent years.
Now, consumer demand has led to the introduction of these soft -sided toddler pools which are
large enough for kids to gain confidence in the water, not just cool off on a hot day. For
example, in a period of less than six weeks, our five year old son went from scared of the water
to full submersion and a total comfort level. This progress has shown in up in his swimming
lessons taken at the Edina Community Center. Our son now lives for his pool. The appealing
nature of the pool is also reflected by the draw it has become for family, friends and neighboring
children with whom we frequently shared it.
In short, aesthetically appealing no longer exists as a valid reason to not allow these toddler
pools. As our culture changes and our desire to entertain and provide stimulating activities for
our children in our own back yards changes, we need to update this code to accept and permit
these off the shelf toddler pools in Edina.
Health and Safety.
At our first meeting with the Board on September 3, 2003, a majority of the members agreed that
the prohibition of these types of toddler pools was outdated and needed to be revised; taking into
consideration the health and safety issues that goes along with any pool use. One of the main
concerns raised by the members was whether there would be a challenge posed to fire personal
conducting a rescue from a pool of this kind. I have enclosed a picture of my son and me in our
pool that clearly shows the ease of entering the pool without use of any impeding ladder or steps.
(Exhibit D1 -D2) I am 5'4" and can easily get in or out of the pool without any problems.
Our family is no againsf safety re�ulatimg thm woutd-inchrde -fences- o"hemical tracking in
order to keep our children safe.
We were not looking for a variance regarding this pool ordinance. We are requesting a city code
change that would include some parameters that would allow these pools with appropriate safety
and health regulations.
We feel very strongly that a revision to this code section be considered.
Respectfully,
7u and Pete Chirpich
Edina Residents
Attachments
2 .G C •^�.v t L-¢, (,,•i'�. fry. ♦ • t•�� !fi • ✓ ` j
van-
�t sj: }'` V }`_ : t.'.`,✓1� f_ "!t r r' f i4 V:%4
• j Lv� 3.l �}1:T � .aS 1-iV
Al
I ALUM
' j r d',''i ".ru�V�'�i"i� •• :+ `s �e,r`t � w.• 'ir . .
�7 ..' •�.ii. �.v '{'��� ;•.s Cam: �ti�. 4.. • ,!'•. � .";
• � � � -drill � .� -1+�
} -
i 111S t•
ln••, '% `[ 4 � t � _ --i �� amiss � -- I ` - � _ -
4 ` .
.1
.F-• - .r`r'- .K+acP4I-
Awannntu ,
t'!
a
Ik
6.. t
44
_17
a 7#ff . . . . .
'Put
, F44
ly .
. . . . . . . . . . .
-------------
swam
WIN
`VV •r. ,•yj
*+sr,
t7
-
vN
�i .fix f
`; 1.� �' •�. .�.. w� �� �I iii. '� ;! r Rye g - " -• � `l. . .. Z'.i� .f• _
4r43 4
�« ; i )<lje� � •`i �:' f ,�X�1. � ' , '�& Ii 1i /(1 � r( 1(: i l�r i . � � {j!9 r .. 1 ~ ''..'• i
•�.�.• +' {{••4 ; ti I, •, •may • '1 '�'�' ;��L ` i�.11�7111 ��dlN.0 � � � .. '_f
r. r t� r '` 1 ��• � � l
���r, j - •7� q��14j1 .rf. -' •T.,q���tEEk��'s` �« r � .7 .. !Y '� ��"t... � �'' �'� :`
�iL• 4i.L•'t� 6Z•'�lQL'r� Pia•' i _. _ .1- .n }i .jam �h._. i - w,'` '1�� "rlL.
406
-14
4r
AN
-fh
'�' 44
P
o p,
M
Z;.
IVY., fv
IS
Mo.
A I ,
,r
f a.�;.'r�' ^; LFif { •rte � ..� Ci4, -
S A1I•�r7''� •J
� ,: �'+ . >� � - , t � ca - ,,nom � .k • , � �.
jo
WINE
!•. ,� cM�'' ^r .. , �.:%.*�r±'t,,�•y'�`- yam.. �
r�r. Y• .� , z
i
il•': 1♦,(} }/(Y4 P"- � il !� #j�y;y��'t s5tlf� - �
. ` � 7 .€� �- .5+t "�rxT `i� �J[ y I �„r 4!a�y: is'• 1 .mss _
�i4r�lck•..t 3.ef!-,f�iK � ����. ~,S��k�� � 4 r[ . - -
__.-_- _..-t 4... .. .....�.�+..v.JiJNf �r w�R :�•l �-.d.r scams v,.. ___P.� i:�?
�. 3L L �1
'� fir. .• •'•. ��� • .1j� �:� . a � � �''` _ Wit' � - � ,`
•i 1 '.k i v� •`
lk
`'!�s�• '�� {'tom M y - ,T � f - •
�W4
- +Y.1.+rs -t .., • HMV
3.5 - f 4 'A •'�
_ .art. ✓ �'� t iT- : i _ � _ -Z _�� 4 -til �1 �.� x. t.��-t,t '�.�..-
vi{
rt-ONNI
fr
ilL i
I
3
„4
a
i a
EDINA CONSTUCTION BOARD OF APPEALS
STAFF REPORT
August 25, 2003
Case number: CBA03 -01
Appellant: Pete and Judy Chirpich
5601 McGuire Road
Lot 6, Block 6, La Buena Vista
Request: Variance for above ground swimming pool
Backstround
An above ground pool was discovered in response to a complaint. The Health Department,
,
,which regulates pools, notified the Chirpichs of the prohibitions against above ground pools and
their appeal rights on 6/10/03 (enclosure #1). The City received the Chirpichs appeal on 7/9/03
(enclosure #2). Appeal notice was published, sent to all property owners within 200' of the
subject property and sent to the Chirpichs on 8/13/03.
Issues /Analysis
Edina City Code, Section 450.06, Subd. 11, (enclosure #3) prohibits above ground pools.
Because they are specifically prohibited, no regulations exist in the City Code governing safety
or sanitation issues related to above ground pools. Fencing, water quality, protection of the City
water supply, electrical safety, ingress and egress, permitting and inspections, location on
property and drainage are some issues to be considered in the installation and use of a swimming
pool.
Research into the history of this ordinance hasn't been helpful. .I've enclosed copies of the
meeting minutes relating to above ground pools (enclosure #4). There seems to have been
discussion, but only the results are recorded.
The enclosed memorandum from David Velde, City Sanitarian, discusses aesthetic and life
safety issues related to above ground pools (enclosure #5). The Health Department, headed by
Mr. Velde, administers swimming pool regulations.
Pictures of the pool are included (enclosure #6)
Staff Report, CBA03 -01
• August 25, 2003
Page 2 of 2
Con clusion/Recommendation
Based on potential issues associated with above ground swimming pools, staff does not support
the request for variance.
Enclosures: #1, 6/10/03 Dave Velde violation letter
#2, 7/9/03 Chirpich appeals request
#3, ECC, Sec 450
#4, Excerpts from Edina City Council minutes, 4/2/79, 4/16/79, 6/4/79, 6/18/79
#5, 8/19/2003 David Velde memorandum
#6, pool pictures
H :\ConstBd Wppeals\BD03- 06,CBA03 -01,5601 McGuire
., , - -
INTEROFFICE..MEMORANDUM
TO: STEVE KIRCHMAN, EDINA BUILDING OFFICIAL
FROM: DAVID VELDE, EDINA HEALTH DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: ABOVE GROUND SWIMMINGTOOLS
DATE: 8/19/2003
CC:
The City of Edina regulates residential swimming.pools. for health and- safety reasons. In .
1979, the Edina City Council adopted, an ordinance prohibiting above ground swimming
pools. This prohibition was adopted for aesthetic reasons.
Beyond the aesthetics of the above ground swimming. pool, I believe that access to the
swimming pool for life saving becomes more difficult due to the lack of decking around the
above ground swimming pool. Furthermore, if one were to construct an elevated deck
around the swimming pool, the deck would also obstruct access to the swimming pool.
^ , , � � �� ': 'y��"�,,'.�"s,� o♦ � ,•'h a -- L % ,r�i� YC '.
..,�.:.� �. ♦R'� � .,. 4. �'•s � if ,•!� � :!•. i2 �. M �r >�� -
_ � � 1 .JR' .. .:'� �'3^:V '- . �i. c s i ;.� ♦ „� +��i 1� ( ' .r: {'''� bdtlM" . a, . 1''= <�� �'•j"t ',.
t
"
r'
` L ,
,a
,
^
,
•`tom � Y
1 • `
-
I�
r�
LN
...
v y �.yLgl e
a• ' i'
.41.!" ��fr.•..� e � I ll�.j ►� i�.� •b ..n _ ,. .. _,max.,
ro �
,.'ti ��cY` ->� t'`� i,,4y �'y"�.1"i<�... • d.� it ;: '� °w� L { r a.i, .. a. . .
�:� .•�. .,F �'tr;. '��i k � sr•.j�•v"+r4,�"a: "�ltl✓� �'�'�4r ."�3"`y�`"".., r r} %, � M' ., `9x - .
t:
,
µ ,
�• "qit ,� -.:'. � "�e+amlu ..,`�dr:.++M� ....a�, + 'flfi�., r�� '"io� '�' ..... .''y,� r
t
,
,
{
t
VA
Pvti
or
77
*Sze - tv
-Vol 7
417
CA
6v
lot
lei..... .....
?1 4-0
tz
Z�� ���*5>� t-+ r�:' i Yi" 3 L i �t }S yS a '4 f'�� +•a`E'�,��y�:
I
Construction Board of Appeals
Meeting Minutes
September 3, 2003
7:00 AM, Edina City Hall Lower Level Conference Room
Board members present: John Glover, Ed Noonan, Dave Fisher, Ron Clark, Quentin Collins
Public attendees: Grant Malcom - 5609 McGuire Rd., 952 -941 -2651; Judy Chirpich -
5601 McGuire Rd., 952- 9441013; Gerald Robinson - 5600 7& St. W,
952 -941 -4655
Staff present: Dave Velde, Steve Kirchman, Bev Haw
I. OPENING OF MEETING
Mr. Kirchman opened meeting with a roll call and introduced the newest member, John Glover.
Boardmember Glover gave a history of his experience and qualifications to serve on this Board.
Mr. Kirchman explained that this Board meets only on an "as needed" basis, the last meeting was
in 2000.
H. ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN AND CO -CHAIR
Discussion by members as to whom would be interested in Chairman position and what is
required of the Chairman. Boardmember Noonan made a motion to elect John Glover as
Chairman. Motion seconded by Boardmember Clark, vote was unanimous to elect John Glover
as Chairman. Chairman Glover suggests Boardmember Noonan as Vice Chair, Boardmember
Noonan accepts, vote is unanimous to elect Boardmember Noonan as Vice Chairman.
II. CBA03 -01: 5601 McGuire Rd — Appeal of Ordinance prohibiting above
ground swimming pools.
Chairman Glover states the purpose of the meeting is the case of Peter and Judy Chirpich and'
their appeal of the ordinance prohibiting above ground pools. Members have reviewed the staff
report and two members of the board have visited the site.
Mr. Kirchman stated that an above ground pool was discovered in response to a complaint, the
Health Department, which regulates pools, notified the Chirpichs of the prohibitions in Edina
against above ground pools and their appeal rights. The Chirpichs appeal was received on July
9, 2003. Notice was published and everyone within 200 ft was notified. Mr. Kirchman
explained that the ordinance simply prohibits above ground pools, there is no discussion in the
code about why. There are no rules in place to regulate them. Mr. Kirchman did do some
research into when the ordinance was passed in 1979, and there are no verbatim minutes. The
minutes simply noted that there was some discussion and that it was passed. There is an
enclosed memo from Mr. Velde, the City Sanitarian that discusses what he believes to be the
CBA minutes
9/03/2003
Page 2 of 6
reasoning for the prohibition of above ground pools. Based on the ordinance the staff does not
support the request for a variance.
Chairman Glover requested opinions from neighbors present at meeting.
Mr. Grant Malcom, a neighbor- of the Chirpichs, did not understand why they should not be
allowed to have the pool. Mr. Malcom stated that there was no reasoning for not allowing the
pools when it was put in place back in 1979. Mr. Malcom stated that he has no objections to the
pool, and, in fact, loves the pool.
Boardmember Noonan raised the concern of no fencing around the pool and asked Mr. Malcom
if that was a concern for him.
Mr. Malcom replied that fencing was not a concern.
Another neighbor, Mr. Robinson, stated that he had no objection to the pool at all and stated that
since they have moved into their home they have allowed their 3 yr old daughter to frequently
play in the pool. Mr. Robinson has no safety concerns regarding this pool and believes the
design of this pool seems almost brilliant because it is a soft -sided pool which means it is easy
for an adult to get in and push the sides down. They collapse right down and you can step right
into it. The way it slopes up kids can't climb into the pool because they can't get a handhold.
The depth is great for his 3 yr old, about 2 ft deep, so it is only chest deep allowing her to play
and gain confidence in the water. Mr. Robinson stated that he is not bothered by the fact that
there is no fence surrounding the pool, however, if there were a requirement for a fence he would
certainly understand that. Mr. Robinson suggested that perhaps the original ordinance was
based upon esthetics back in 1979 but that things have changed as far as types of entertainment
equipment. Back in 1979 people went to Sears and paid $50 for a swing set, now people are
paying $4,000 on big play structures, there are trampolines that are 20 ft wide with netting that
goes up 12 —15', people are doing sport courts. Values have shifted; people are putting a lot
more emphasis on recreation and sports opportunities. This pool seems within a reasonable
bounds, its under 20' diameter, and its only 2' deep. Mr. Robinson maybe would be opposed if it
were 40' long and 4' deep at which point he would recommend it be installed in- ground. This
pool is only up temporarily due to the short swimming season, its great for the younger kids. Mr.
Robinson stated that his 3 yr old was intimidated going to the public pool, its much more
difficult to supervise the young children at the public pool, there is a lot of rough housing and
older children around, whereas this pool is of tremendous benefit.
Chairman Glover agreed that the ordinance does not clarify why above ground pools are not
allowed. Chairman Glover said that he has looked at the pool and really could not see the
objections to it. Chairman Glover stated that he has a trampoline in his backyard that is higher
than this pool. When this ordinance was written 25 years ago there was no thought of
trampolines.
Boardmember Clark asked for an explanation of what defines a "special purpose" pool.
CBA minutes
9/03/2003
Page 3 of 6
Mr. Velde explained that it would be like a hot tub or a whirlpool. A "wading pool" is a pool
that is less than 24" in depth and is constructed in the ground. Small plastic pools are not
regulated, and can be any size if under 24" in depth.
Boardmember Noonan questions what liability the City would have if something were to happen
to a child in an allowed above ground pool without fencing or any other restrictions that we
currently have on other in ground or indoor pools. Boardmember Noonan recounted a situation 3
or 4 years ago when he sat on a hearing regarding egress around a pool deck that was to narrow
to get a health rescue stretcher by, and the positioning of the stairway railing, and the City was
concerned over possibility of some liability. Boardmember Noonan raised the issue of any
possible exposure that the City might incur as a result of the approval of this pool.
Boardmember Noonan indicated that he did not feel as though he has enough information to
make an adequate decision. Boardmember Noonan was a paramedic for Hennepin County and
assisted on 6 drownings - 3 in outdoor pools and 3 in indoor bathtubs, and understands the
potential dangers. Because of the lateness of the season could we consider tabling this issue until
we could study it further and basically give them the right to keep the pool up for the rest of the
season and by next spring have the information available and go through Council or staff to
study this and make a decision that would be in effect for the next swimming season. .
Mr. Kirchman stated that one of the choices at this time would be to not take any action and
refer it to the City Council for review and possibly changing the ordinance. If this appeal is
denied they have the right to appeal. The pool would not be ordered to be removed until the
appeal process has been completed. The Chirpichs can appear before the Council and try to get
the ordinance changed.
Mr. Robinson disagreed with the statement that if this pool were to be allowed then all above
ground pools would need to be allowed and suggested that the staff would be required to set
forth safety regulations and parameters. Mr. Robinson suggested that staff could do additional
research and set forth regulations regarding depth, length, type of sides, rescue accessibility. Mr.
Robinson also recommended looking at ordinances from other cities.
Chairman Glover stated that this Board does not have the authority to overthrow this ordinance,
or even change this ordinance and approve this variance. Times have changed and what is
backyard recreation is a lot different than it was 25 years ago. Chairman Glover suggested that
although he personally had no problem with the pool, the Board can't change the ordinance.
What we can do is take this issue to Council.
Mr. Velde then addressed the 1979 decision to restrict above ground pools. At that time the City
Council was not sure whether we should restrict above ground pools or not. The reason they
held it over for one meeting was they wanted to get some press out to the public. There was an
article written in the local paper and the public did not respond. Some council members did
speak to people that they knew and some thought that the public did not want to see above
ground swimming pools so the Council decided to keep the ordinance as it was and not to allow
above ground swimming pools.
CBA minutes
9/03/2003
Page 4 of 6
Chairman Glover stated that, in his opinion, the above ground pool prohibition was not related to
health issues, but health issues need to be considered and should be put into any regulations
which would be adopted. Issues of concern would be chlorine levels, PH balance,
bacteriological counts and other issues that would be the same as owners of in ground pools.
The pool owners would have some duties that they would have to live up to.
Mrs. Chirpich agreed that these levels must be maintained or you will end up with a green pool
that would not be safe. This ordinance does not regulate pools with a depth of less than 24".
Mrs. Chirpich indicated that her pool is 25 Y2" deep.
Chairman Glover questioned if this pool could have an overflow valve which. would keep the
depth under, 24"'
and the Board could make a recommendation to the City at which time they
could review the ordinance and determine restrictions and regulations.
Boardmember Fisher said that he did not have a problem with this .particular pool, however, this
would raise the question of what would be allowed and what would not be allowed and that
approving this pool would open a can of worms.
Chairman Glover suggested that this ordinance would not be studied and changed before the next
pool season.
Boardmember Noonan is not comfortable with recommending a o ao around time. interpretation of on at the ordinance as it stands now. The Board has specific choices t
Boardmember Noonan asked staff that if the Board recommends the issue be referred to Council,
would the staff agree to investigate on behalf of the Council and make a staff recommendation.
Chairman Glover asked Mr. Velde if the Health Department does inspection of in ground
swimming pools.
Mr. Velde replied that we do a final inspection when they are installed but we do not do
maintenance inspections. The only maintenance inspections that are done by the City are on
public and semi -public pools such as apartment buildings, the aquatic center, the YMCA, that
type of place. Mr. Velde indicated that there are over 500 private swimming pools in the City
and we do not do maintenance inspections on them. The only issue on the books regarding in
ground swimming pools is the one that was in question in 1979. That pool was partially above
ground and they did finish off the grade around the entire pool so that it was below grade. That
was the situation that caused the wording, "above ground" to be included in the ordinance.
Mr. Robinson's suggested another option available to the Board. Instead of referring this issue
to Council the Board could direct staff to further research above ground pools and report back
with recommendations to be discussed and forwarded to Council.
Chairman Glover discussed with W. Robinson the extent that this board could do further study
and make recommendations to the Council. Chairman Glover suggests that a recommendation
be made to request staff to revisit the issue, look at the issue again, and make another staff report.
CBA minutes
9/03/2003
Page 5 of 6
The current report was made by Mr. Velde but the recommendation to deny the ordinance came
from Mr. Kirchman based on the facts of how the ordinance stands today.
Boardmember Collins pointed out the ordinance is very clear, and even though we are
considerate of this particular case, the ordinance is very straightforward and does not give us any
"wiggle" room.
Chairman Glover states that we can recommend that the staff look at the issue again, put it out
for public comment, and consider recommending ordinance revisions to the Council.
Boardmember Collins agreed that we are headed in the right direction.
Mrs. Chirpich stated that she is hearing a degree of support to at least look at updating or
changing the current ordinance. Mrs. Chirpich requested further consideration and study on the
safety and esthetic issues and to consider a variance for this pool. Mrs. Chirpich also suggested
that other backyard play sets, trampolines, hot tubs and additional play items are relatively new
items and should also be looked at.
Chairman Glover replied to Ms. Chirpich that the board would not be comfortable going to the
Council to support this particular pool.
Ms. Chirpich responded that she was not particularly requesting a specific variance for their pool .
but support to revise the City Code with different parameters regarding size, etc. and bring the
City Code up to date with regard to all recreational equipment.
Boardmember Noonan states that he has great confidence in the Board, the Council and the City
staff; however, he does not feel that at this time the Board could grant a variance for this
particular pool. Boardmember Noonan would recommend reexamining the ordinance, do further
study and make recommendations to the Council. Examination of health and safety issues, fire
department rescue issues, possible liability issues and possible insurance issues need further
study to make an informed decision.
Mr. Kirchman suggested that a motion be made to direct staff to make recommendations on
possible changes to the ordinance and report back to the Board at the next meeting. The Council
could always direct the board to further investigate. The staff will study health and safety issues
and report to the board. This staff report will be distributed prior to the next scheduled meeting
to give everyone an opportunity to review the recommendations.
A motion to direct staff to do further study and report back to the board was made by
Boardmember Noonan. The motion was seconded by Boardmember Fisher. No
discussion. Chairman Glover called for a vote; the result was unanimous approval of this
motion.
Boardmember Noonan thanked Mrs. Chirpich for the opportunity to look into this issue.
i
CBA minutes
9/03/2003
Page 6 of 6
Boardmember Fisher asked Mrs. Chirp old fell in, would the 2 yr oldebe ableto g t �? vable
ladder was not m the pool and a year
Mrs. Chirpich replied "no".
Discussion closed and the residents left the meeting at this tune.
IV. CBA03 -02: 6301 Knoll Dr. S. - Edina City Code, Section 450.06,
Subd 8, regulating pool ladders
Mr. Kirchman stated that the next meeting date would be set to discuss the requirement for a
ladder in a pool. The approved plans for the pool required a ladder that was not installed.
Boardmember Fisher suggested that homeowner just install the ladder.
Mr. Kirchman stated that homeowner did not want to do that. A final inspection for this pool has
not been approved.
V. NEXT MEETING DATE AND AGENDA — Monday, September 22, 2003
7:00 A.M.
The first possible date for the next meeting would be September 22, 2003 or anytime after that
date. Staff report for the Chirpich appeal will be ready by that time.
Boardmember Noonan requested an updated roster including cell phone numbers. Board
members discussed issues that will be addressed in the staff report regarding above ground pools.
Future issues that may need to be addressed would include trampolines, skateboards,
rollerblades, hot tubs, swing sets, soccer goals and other recreational items.
Boardmember Noonan made a motion to adjourn; Chairman John Glover seconded it.
VI. ADJOURNMENT: 8:00 A.M,
Respectfully submitted
Steve A. Kirchman
Board Secretary
41r
Construction Board of Appeals
Staff Report
September 29, 2003
CBA03 -01 Peter and Judy Chirpich
5601 McGuire Road
Lot 6, Block 69 La Buena Vista
Request: A variance from Code Section 450.06, Subd
• 11, prohibiting above ground swimming
pools
Background:
A soft -sided swimming pool was installed at 5601 McGuire Road. The swimming pool is located
in the rear yard and rests on the ground. The swimming p ool is designed to hold water to a depth
_ of 30 inches. A notice was sent to the residents at 5601 McGuire Road instructing them to
remove the above ground swimming poo1pursuant -to City Code Section 450.06, Subd. 11, which
prohibits the installation of above ground swimming pools.
d the notice to remove the above ground swimming pool to the Board of
The residents appeale
Construction Appeals and the appeal was heard on September 9, 2003. The Construction Board
of Appeals deferred action on the appeal and requested more information from staff regarding
insurance, health and safety, and input from other swimming pool contractors.
Issues /Analysis
City Code Section 450 defines a swimming pool �nches�The subject swidrnmi g pool exgn�faor
human use, with a water depth greater than
water depth of 24 inches, therefore meets the definition of a swimming pool and must meet the
requirements of Code Section 450.
The Code requires the submission of construction plans and the issuance of a building permit
prior to installing a swimming pool. The swimming pool was installed without plans or building
permit.
The Code expressly prohibits above ground swimming pools. The swimming pool is installed on
the ground, above grade.
The Code requires the installation of a fence around the swimming pool equipped with self -
closing and self - latching gates. There is no fence around the swimming pool.
The Code requires a four -foot wide, unobstructed deck around the swimming pool. There is no
deck around the swimming pool for rescue purposes. A memorandum from Edina Fire Chief
Marty Scheerer is attached expressing his concern about rescue operations involving above
ground swimming pools.
The Code requires a recirculation system consisting of pumps, piping, filters, skimmers, valves
and disinfection equipment, which comply with the National Sanitation Foundation (NSF) .
Staridard No. 50. The swimming pool has a pump and filter. The swimming pool does not have
skimmers or disinfection equipment installed in the piping. It is not known if the pump and filter
meet NSF Standard No. 50. A local swimming pool contractor indicated that owners of these
soft -sided pools were seeking help from them in filter replacement and controlling water clarity.
Model standards have been developed by the National Swimming Pool Institute (NSPI) for
residential swimming pools, both in ground and above ground. There are no standards for soft
sided above ground swimming pools. The City of Edina utilizes model standards, whenever
possible, when adopting local Codes.
The insurance industry was contacted for information about soft -sided above ground swimming
pools. The company contacted did have fence requirements for swimming pools, including above
ground swimming pools, but none for soft -sided portable swimming pools.
Con dusion/Recommendation
Soft -sided above ground swimming pools are a recent entry into the residential swimming pool
market. Homeowners can purchase them. off the shelf and install them in their back yard at a low
cost. There are no national standards for design, operation and construction of these'swimming
pools and they may not have adequate filtration and circulation to maintain water quality.
Gaining access to the swimming pool in a rescue operation appears to be problematic due to the
lack of a deck around the perimeter of the swimming pool.
Staff recommends denial of the appeal based upon the fact that the swimming. pool lacks a deck
around the pool, there is no fence controlling access to the pool and there are no national
standards available to evaluate the design, operation and construction of the swimming pool.
Edina Fire Department
6250 Tracy Avenue
Edina, Minnesota 55436 -2580
(952) 8260330
Fax (952) 8260393
Date:
To:
From:
Subject:
Mr. Velde,
City of Edina
4801 west 50th &r cet
Edina, Minnesota 95424-1594
(952) 927.8861
Fax (992) 8260390
MEMORANDUM
September 5, 2003
David Velde, City Sanitarian
Marty Scheerer, Fire Chief
Above ground swimming pools
This letter is to follow up on our conversation regarding above ground
swimming pools in the City of Edina.
The Edina Fire department would not recommend the approval of above
ground swimming pools in the city. Above ground pools pose. a significant
challenge to Fire Department personnel when try to attempt a rescue from a
pool. Rescuers need a large stable area to work from and to stage
equipment. Any steps or ladders are also an impediment to any rescue
efforts. The large soft -sided pools would also be difficult to perform a
rescue from due to the large volume of water that would rush at the fire
personnel in a rescue attempt.
Should you have any further questions, please contact me.
CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF APPEALS
MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 29, 2003
Board Members Present: Ron Clark, John Glover, Dave Fisher, Ed Noonan,
Members Absent: Bruce Bermel, Quentin Collins
Staff Present: Dave Velde, Steve Kirchman, Bev Haw
Others Present: Mrs. Judy Chirpich - 5601 McGuire Rd, W.Gerald Robinson -
5600 70t' St W
I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES:
Chairman Glover stated he did not receive 9/3/03 minutes.
Mr. Kirchman said that the minutes were mailed, but will be remailed and the Board can
make any necessary changes.
II. OLD BUSINESS:
CBA03 -02: - 5602 McGuire Rd. - Edina City Code, Section 450.06
Subd 11, prohibiting above ground
swimming pools
Chairman Glover confirmed receipt of the staff report by Board members and Chirpichs
and opened the issue the for discussion.
Judy Chirpich brought up the concern about the difficulty of rescue from this pool. She
had taken pictures of herself entering and exiting the pool but her printer did not work so
she was unable to bring them. She stated that this is a 5000 - gallon toddler pool and in
her opinion it is a very easy pool to get in and out of Mrs. Chirpich also brought up the
memo she received from the Fire Chief stating they needed a large stable area to work
from, but it doesn't state the size of the pool. She again stressed how easy the pool is to
get in and out of, with only a depth of 25 ". Mrs. Chirpich then commented on the
question of the rushing water when emptied. She mentioned she and her neighbor
experienced it when they started emptying it, adding that the rush is definitely a push but
not enough to push an adult over. The water "rush" did not push either one of them
over.
Boardmember Noonan questioned the depth of the pool, restrictions on the height, what
determines it to be a pool, wading pool vs. swimming pool, etc. He added he has some
concerns with no type of boundary or guidance from the City on this. Boardmember
Noonan questioned if this pool requires a permit. He pointed out no permit was issued for
CBA minutes
9/29/2003
Page 2
this pool, Chirpichs did not understand if they needed a permit, and the code
requirements should be more clear. Boardmember Noonan suggested using the About
Town or other means of technology to address some of these issues to head them off.
Boardmember Noonan then brought up fencing safety on both above and in ground pools
and the ability for anyone walk up to this pool. He also questioned the deck requirement
around the pool. Is this a good thing or bad thing? We do not allow them to raise the
grade to make up the deck surface. He brought up his experience as a paramedic and
concerns on rescues, other than drowning, were head and neck injuries. Because of this,
more equipment is brought into a pool and the staging area is a little more important with
backboards etc, to adequately get people safely out of the pool. This is a different
application, there is no diving into the pool, but such injuries could happen even in a
shallow body of water. He talked to Marty (Fire Chief) about the effect of water rushing
out of the pool on rescuers who will be burdened with gear and unknowledgeable of what
they are getting into till they get to the scene. He questioned how health issues would be
regulated on a 5,000 - gallon pool with no required chemical treatment.
Judy Chirpich commented that she uses chemicals to keep the pool water clean.
Boardmember Noonan questioned the size of the body of water and whether it would be
harder to maintain then a wading pool, and asked if that should be looked at.
Chairman Glover mentioned that before he received the staff report he was more
accepting of the pool. The sanitation aspect is not one that is high on priorities because
one can have the system in any pool and not put chemicals in or not operate it properly.
Chairman Glover said his concern is the lack of an unobstructed deck around the pool
and the lack of fencing. He pointed out if the variance for this pool - which is 30" deep
and fairly accessible to an adult person for rescue - is approved, then other above ground
pools that are higher will have to be addressed. Until we have some model codes in effect
and some experience he will not support this appeal.
Boardmember Clark mentioned that his biggest concern is safety, or the lack of it and the
City does have an ordinance in place regulating pools. This type of above ground pool is
a new twist for the City, and if the board approves this pool the board may not be in
keeping with the ordinance. Boardmember Clark said he personally has concerns over
this and has concerns especially for the City of Edina. The safety issue is a huge concern
for him and he can't see how he can support the variance request.
Boardmember Fisher stated he also agrees this type of pool presents a safety issue. If this
pool is approved, where does the City draw the line? He added he agrees with other
comments that this poses problems, and in his opinion the variance would be tough to
support.
Chairman Glover asked if there is any further discussion
Boardmember Noonan asked if there is any conditional use that could be considered here.
CBA minutes
9/29/2003 '
Page 3
Mr. Kirchman stated this an issue that the City Council may want to look into and see if
they are willing to considef it. He added he doesn't believe a conditional use permit can
be implemented here, but the Board can make recommendations to the Council.
Boardmember Noonan mentioned since the pool is already down for the season, it
appears the homeowner has time to appeal our decision to the Council.
Chairman Glover asked for a motion on this variance request
Boardmember usher motioned for denial.
Boardmember Clark seconded the motion..
All voted aye; motion to deny variance passed.
Asked if there was any recommendation that can be made at this time that this be
forwarded on and who has to actually make the request to the city for an appeal to
council
Mr. Kirchman also stated that staff has already made their recommendations based on our
research, but if the Construction Board of Appeals would like to pass on
recommendations to Council that needs to be included in the motion.
Chairman Glover asked if the insurance company had been spoken to.
Mr. Velde said that he called an adjuster, and they said they didn't have any experience
on the soft -sided pools.
Boardmember Clark asked if there were a kind of set up standards either by the
manufacturers or the distributors or the insurance industry that we might want to borrow
to incorporate that language into this ordinance. That way we would have a clearer set of
standards
Mr. Velde said there are standards for above ground swimming pools that are established
by the National Swimming Pool Institute. That is something that could be incorporated
into an ordinance if we are suggesting allowing above ground swimming pools in the
City. There are no standards for the smaller soft -sided portable swimming pool.
Boardmember Clark mentioned at the last meeting they discussed considering that the
Council look into the possibility of allowing above ground pools. It was acknowledged
at that time that the Council would have to revisit this issue because this board does not
have the authority to make that decision. Boardmember Clark noted the board is aware
the City looked into permitting above ground pools in the past and the Council decided at
that time to prohibit them.
f
CBA minutes
9/29/2003
Page 4
Mr. Kirchman asked that even in the absence of an appeal you could direct us to inquire
to Council whether they would be willing to consider any changes in the ordinance
Gerald Robinson asked for a clarification from Mr. Velde why there are no standards for
soft -sided pools by the National Swimming Pool Institute. Are those standards for water
quality, or does cover other safety issues, for example the decking, ladders etc
Mr. Velde explained that it covers everything from filtration equipment, design, whether
it has a diving pool or not, recirculation system, filters, chlorinators, pumps and includes
standards for water quality.
Mr. Robinson pointed out that it seems to just cover the mechanicals and water quality
but not the safety, or rescue type of issues, like the decking, fencing, etc.
Mr.Velde said that there is a section on decking and fencing, they recommend those, they
are not part of the standards but recommendations for communities to follow.
Chairman Glover asked how to direct staff to go to council with this recommendation so
we are not left in the same situation as when we first started this. There was discussion
with the council about 15 -20 years ago and there is no record as to why is was turned
down. Need to get out concerns of the issue of safety around the pool to Council.
Mr. Velde suggested a memo from the chair to the City Council to raise that issue.
Staff could draft a memo for Chairman Glover to sign and pass it on to City Council and
they could ask for more information or take it from there.
Boardmember Noonan would like to expand this discussion from pools to include play
structures, trampolines, etc.
Mr. Robinson stated that, in his opinion, the Construction Board of Appeals has the
ability to go into depth if they chose to do an initial draft of a code. To go to the City
Council and say, here are our thoughts on the issue and some initial background research,
at least give them a little firmer starting position.
Mr. Kirchman explained that the Construction Board of Appeals actually is required by
the State to be in place by the State Building Codes and Standard Division and its
primary purpose is to make decisions on the building code, not on city ordinances.
Typically, a Construction Board of Appeals would not be dealing with city ordinances at
all; they would be dealing with state codes. But this is the way we are set up here. I
would prefer that since we are working with a city ordinance that we can't change
anyway that we let Council look at it and direct staff or the Board. They may send it back
to us to make some recommendations for an ordinance. If so, the Board will have a clear
direction and directive.
4. r
CBA minutes
9/29/2003
Page 5
Chairman Glover asked if any other comments
Steve Kirchman confirmed that the staff will draw up a memo for the Chair to go to
Council
H. CBA03 -02: 6301 Knoll Dr. S. — Edina City Code, Section 450.06,
Subd 8, regulating pool ladders
Chairman Glover next item on the agenda is in regards to the swimming pool ladder at
the Brockway residence and it clearly falls under jurisdiction. Asked if everyone read
information put together by staff. Asked for discussion
Boardmember Noonan asked who signed the permit when it was picked up, was it the
homeowner or through a pool company?
Mr. Velde answered that it was a pool company and they were aware that a ladder was
required.
Boardmember Noonan asked if the signature line of the permit application "I will comply
with all," part of the language?
Mr. Kirchman answered yes and it was marked on the plans.
Boardmember Fisher asked why is he appealing this?
Mr. Velde answered that Mr. Brockway doesn't want the ladder. He's got a swim -out in
the deep end that he uses to get in and out of the pool and doesn't want the ladder
obstructing the view of the pool, because the ladder has a handrail.
Boardmember Fisher mentioned that they knew this before he built the pool that a ladder
was required.
Mr. Velde said that he doesn't know if the homeowner knew but the contractor did, and
we believe that the reason the ladder with the hand rail is necessary is if somebody is in
trouble in the water they at least have something to grab onto to pull themselves out.
Boardmember Fisher is surprised why this is even here, suggested to put the ladder in.
Boardmember Noonan asked Mr. Velde if he has seen the pool
Mr. Velde said no that Solvei Wilmot has, she was out on the final inspection and
discovered the ladder missing.
Boardmember Noonan asked if there was any hardware embedded into the construction
at all that would accept a ladder
CBA minutes
9/29/2003 '
Page 6
Mr. Velde said that that was not even there
Boardmembers asked for swim -out details.
Mr. Velde explained that on the deep end where the water is 6' or deeper a ledge is built
in the corner of the pool just below water level to enable a swimmer to swim over there
and sit on the and/or get out of the pool. These swim -outs are not permitted. City Code
requires a ladder with handrails. A ladder can be installed without obstructing an existing
swim -out.
Boardmember Noonan asked if everything else meet code.
Mr. Velde answered .yes — also mentioned that there are about 20 inground swimming
pools installed each year. We have well over 1000 pools in the City and it is not unusual
to see a swim out but it is unusual to see a swim -out without a ladder.
Boardmember Noonan commented on since the City doesn't do yearly inspections of
these pools that these requirements are observed only at the final.
Boardmember Fisher made a motion to deny the variance request.
Chairman Glover seconded.
All voted aye. The motion to deny the variance passed.
Chairman Glover asked for any other discussion for any upcoming items.
Chairman Glover asked for a motion to adjourn
Boardmember Fisher made a motion, Boardmember Noonan seconded, all voted aye. The
meeting was adjourned at 8:OOAM.
City of Edina
MEMORANDUM
TO: Edina City Council
FROM: Edina Construction Board of Appeals
John Glover, Chairman
DATE: October 23, 2003
SUBJECT: Above ground swimming pools, ECC 450.06, Subd. 11
On September 29, 2003 the Construction Board of Appeals denied a request for a variance for an above
ground swimming pool at 5601 McGuire Road. Edina City Code Section 450.06, Subd. 11 prohibits
above ground swimming pools.
During deliberation on this matter, the Board questioned the reasoning behind the prohibition on above
ground swimming pools in Edina. Research by staff found that the prohibition on above ground
swimming pools was adopted by ordinance in 1979. The minutes from the City Council meeting did not
shed much light on the reasoning behind the prohibition.
The Board believes the prohibition was based upon aesthetics. The Board is requesting a reaffirmation of
this prohibition from the City Council. The Board questions why an above ground swimming pool is
treated differently than a large play structure or a trampoline in someone's yard.
Beyond the issue of aesthetics, should above ground swimming pools be permitted, when other issues
such as safety and sanitation are considered?
G.•\CouaS"ppeah\ BD034 06, CBA03 -01,5601McGumeRdlCBAaWwgrthmbI
City Hall (952) 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (952) 826 -0390
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (952) 826 -0379
C. A
MEMORANDUM r
wev
OCT z �Uud
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Gordon L. Hughes, City Manager C17-- r < )F ;
'� - -GiN4
FROM: Jerome P. Gilligan
DATE: October 24, 2003
RE: Appeal from Construction Board of Appeals Regarding Above Ground
Swimming Pool
The Construction Board of Appeals heard an appeal from the homeowners at 5201
McGuire Road concernizig a notice received from the City to remove an above ground swimming
pool from their property. Section 450.06, subd. 11 of the City Code, prohibits above ground
swimming pools. The appeal was denied by the Construction Board of Appeals and the
homeowners are appealing this decision to the City Council. The removal of an above ground
swimming pool is not a matter which is subject to an appeal to the Construction Board of
Appeals and for this reason the appeal should be denied by the Council.
Under Section 450.01 of the City Code, a swimming pool is defined as "any basin for
holding water, designed for human use, with a water depth greater than 24 inches." The pool at
5601 McGuire is designed to hold water to a depth of 30 inches and therefore constitutes a
swimming pool under the City Code. Since it is located above ground it is prohibited by Section
450, subd. l l of the City Code.
The homeowners appealed the notice to remove the pool to the Construction Board of
Appeals. Section 400.02 of the City Code sets forth the powers and duties of the Construction
Board of Appeals. Appeals may be considered by the Board from any order, requirement,
permit, decision, refusal or determination made to the Building Official or the Sanitarian in the
application or interpretation of the Code regulating certain building activities and excavations.
In considering appeals the Construction Board of Appeals is determining whether the Building
Official or Sanitarian is properly applying or interpreting the City Code and it does not have the
power to grant variances or exceptions to the requirements of the City Code.
The homeowners appealing the notice to remove the swimming pool are not contesting .
the interpretation of the City Code relative to their above ground swimming pool but are
requesting a variance or exception to the prohibition of above ground swimming pools. There is
no authority for the City Council to grant variances from the requirements of Section 450 of the
City Code. If the Council wants to permit this type of pool it will need to amend the
requirements of Section 450 of the City Code relating to above ground pools.
I recommend that the City Council deny the appeal on the basis that it is not the proper
subject of an appeal to the Construction Board of Appeals since the Board did not have the
jurisdiction to hear this appeal.
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
.. W k
Steve Kirchman
From: Bev Haw
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 10:45 AM
To: Steve Kirchman
Subject: FW: Case File: CBA03 -01
-- Original Message---- -
From: Elizabeth E Stukel [ mailto :elizabeth.e.stukel @aexp.com]
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 5:10 PM
To: bhaw®ci.edina.mn -us
Subject: Case File: CBA03 -01
We live at 5517 McGuire Road, and our backyard adjoins that of Peter and Judy
Chirpich. Not only do we not object to the child size swimming pool in their
yard, we enjoy seeing the children play in it. It would be very disappointing
for the Chirpich family, and their neighbors if the pool were disallowed.
Betsy E. and Randall J. Stukel.
American Express made the following
annotations on 10/27/2003 06:16:34 PM
--------------------------------
**, rw�t, r**** w* t, r*** wt* t**, r** w, r*, r, r, r, rrr*******, r***, r, r**, r* * * *,r,► * * * * * * *tt *,rt * * * *,e * *t,r
"This message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient and may
contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, a-
disclosure, copying, use, or distribution of the information included in this message ai
any attachments is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us by reply e-mail and immediately and permanently delete this message and any
attachments. Thank you."
zvM wn
40`104jrd- Th eat
-Mey
DUILDING QEPAATMENT
I
- - kF ,a- OUT 2 1 2003
L4vsPS
y e y a�� �� S City of Edina, Minnesota CITY OF EDi
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
801 West 501 Street * Edina, Minnesota * (952) 826-0372 * Fax (952) 826 -0390
64A 6. 1 j�o
�iis F��I(s�Ce ,,ASE FILE:
TO:
APPLICANT:
PROPERTY ADDRESS:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
CBA03 -01
Property Owners Within 200 Feet
Peter and Judy Chirpich
5601 McGuire Rd
Lot 6, Block 6, La Buena Vista
PURPOSE: Edina City Code, Section 450.069
Subd 11, prohibiting above ground
Swimming pools.
DATE OF HEARING: Monday, November 3, 2003
OF HEARING' 7.00 pm
n
NA
%A 4
�i
1
� s
d I
'
v
� a
� I
TIME
PLACE OF HEARING: Council Chambers
Edina City Hall
Z*ubzmit 50th Street
HOW TO PARTICIPATE: a letter expressing your vie
*Attend the hearing and give testimony,
*Fax your views 952 826 0390 or,
*E -Mail to bhaw @ci.edina.mn.us
FURTHER INFORMATION: Write: City Hall, Inspections Department
at 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424
or call 952 927 8861
DATE OF NOTICE: Wednesday October 15, 2003
City of Edina
Buildings, Construction and Signs 450.10
water line indicating the greatest depth in feet. Diving structures shall be securely
anchored.
Subd. 10 Minimum Depth. The minimum depth for all pools shall be three feet except
for special purpose pools.
Subd. I Above Ground Swimming Pool; FilL Swimming Pools that are constructed
or erected wholly above ground are and shall be prohibited. No fill shall be placed or
grading done on the property to raise the ground elevation for the purpose of raising the
top elevation of the pool walls.
450.07 Recirculation System. A recirculation system consisting of pumps, piping, filters,
skimmers, valves, and disinfection equipment shall be provided which will clarify and disinfect
the. swimming pool water volume in 12 hours or less. The recirculation system components shall
comply with NSF International 50, .1985.
450.08 Recirculation Pump. The recirculating pump shall have sufficient capacity to provide
the rated flows of the filter system, without exceeding the head loss at which the pump will
deliver such flows. The pump motor shall not be operated at an overload which exceeds the
service factor. The pool pump shall be equipped on the inlet side with an approved hair and lint
interceptor. The basket of the interceptor shall be non - corrosive and have openings not larger
thaw one - fourth inch in diameter.
450.09 Pool Piping. The pool piping shall be sized to permit the rated flows for filtering and
cleaning without exceeding the maximum head at which the pump will provide such flows. In
general, the water velocity in the pool piping should not exceed more than six feet per second.
Where velocity is to exceed six feet per second, summary calculations shall be provided to show
that rated flows are possible with the pump and piping provided. The recirculating piping. and
fittings shall meet the following requirements:
Subd. 1 Vacuum Fitting Location. Where vacuum fittings are provided, they shall be
located in accessible positions below the water line.
Subd. 2 Pool Recirculation Piping. Pool recirculation piping, passing through the
pool structure, shall be copper, brass, or approved equal tubing with a minimum wall
thickness of type "U'.
Subd.3 Pool Piping System. The pool piping system shall be constructed of
materials prescribed in the Minnesota State Plumbing Code.
Subd. 4 Inspection of Pool Piping. Except for the pool water supply line, all pool
piping must be installed by the pool contractor and must be inspected by the Building
Official prior to covering the system.
450.10 Recirculating Skimming Device. Recirculating skimming devices shall be provided
to skim the surface of the pool, with one unit installed to serve each pool, and such additional
450-6 Supplement 2001 -01
My 12, 2006
Hello Again,
My name is Flora Delaney and I spoke to you at the Edina City Council on July 5a' regarding above
ground swimming pools. I thought I would give you a troubling update. I will not be speaking before
your group again. Ever.
I have taken down, the pool in question. Not because I agree with the current state. Not because I do
not want to have a way for my children to enjoy their summer during these hot days by swimming and
laughing in the back yard.
But days after speaking at the City Council I received and ugly, threatening anonymous phone call
from a man who had learned my name and address from the meeting. He also took the time to find out
my phone number, when I had moved to Edina and how much I had paid for my house. Like all
bullies, he was too much of a coward to tell me anything about himself.
But his threats were that I and my children ought not to live in Edina because of the issue of this stupid
pool. That we should get the hell out of his city with our "tacky plastic pool" and let the people who
really care about their homes live in this fine city. And he wanted us out of his city. He was angry, he
was swearing and he knew where I and my children lived.
I am not about to put my children and our property at risk over something as stupid as this pool.
But, this got me to realize that maybe the city has this regulation not out of concern for public safety
(we can see that all surrounding cities have created safe regulations to allow their citizens to have
these pools — so I am sure Edina can figure out how to do it, too.) but because of a desire to protect
landowners' perceived home values rather than the recreation needs of our children. Before going to
the meeting on 7/5, I thought you could be convinced that a logical and common sense approach to
this issue would allow you to resolve this issue for the benefits of families. I am not going to fight this
because of fear for my family.
You, however, have the ability to apply reason and weigh the benefits for our children versus people
who feel as this caller did. I am appealing to you - in this private way - to look at the needs of families
with tweens (too big for kiddy pools, too young to go to the aquatic center alone) and ask that you
stand up to the elitists who believe an Edina address should protect their lifestyle that is fragile enough
to be threatened by a pool and children playing. Working parents, families and a desire to be a "Fit
City" with safe recreation options for people of all income levels should be in your thoughts when you
make this decision.
As for me, I will not appear before you again, because as the police told me after I got this call, "There
is nothing I can do except conduct myself as safely as possible and look out for my family." I thought
by participating in this democratic process, I was being a good citizen and being a good role model for
my children about how one goes about working cooperatively, even when there is a disagreement. As
our city leaders, you will have to ponder the chilling effect on public debate when people like this man
can threaten open discussion about issues as trivial as swimming pools.
Thank you for your consideration,
Delaney
i
• 4is letter was sent to:
James Hovland
Scot Housh
Ann Swenson
Linda Masica
Alice Hulbert
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Boyd Tate
Traffic Safety Coordinator
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
Date: July 18, 2006
Subject: Traffic Safety Staff Review for
July 6, 2006
Recommendation:
Agenda Item
V. E
Consent
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑ To HRA
® To Council
Action
® Motion
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Review and approve Traffic Safety Staff Review of Thursday, July 6, 2006.
Info /Background:
It is not anticipated that residents will be in attendance at the Council meeting regarding any of
the attached issues.
G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Advisory Committee \Staff Review Summaries \06 TS AG & Min \07 -05-06
TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW
Thursday July 6, 2006
The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on July 6, 2006. Staff present included the
City Engineer, Traffic Engineer, Traffic Safety Coordinator, Sign Coordinator, and Chief of
Police.
From that review, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons
involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them.
They have also been informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional
facts to present, they can be included on the July 18, 2006 Council Agenda.
SECTION A:
Requests on which staff recommends approval:
Request from Edina Fire Marshal to restrict parking on the north side of School
Road to the west of Concord School and south around the curve to West 60I'
Street. The Fire Marshal states that it is extremely difficult for emergency
vehicles to navigate and operate along this street during school events due to the
narrow width with vehicles parked on both sides of the roadway. The request will
improve accessibility for emergency vehicles.
School Road is a 24 -foot wide City Street from Concord Ave to Ruth Drive. West
of Ruth Drive the street widens to 30 -feet. There is curb and gutter with no
sidewalks. No vehicle or pedestrian accidents have been reported in the past
five years.
School Road has the following parking restrictions currently in place: "No
Parking Anytime" on the north side of School Road from Concord running west to
the parking lot of Concord School. "No Parking School Days" on the south side
of School Road from Concord Ave running west to 4729 School Road. Parking is
allowed on both sides of the street west of the parking lot and south to West 60th
Street.
At the July 5, 2006 council meeting, staff recommended that School Road be
posted 'No Parking Anytime" from the west end of the parking lot of Concord
School, to the west and south around the curve of School Road to West 60th
Street.
Two residents spoke against this recommendation at that meeting indicating their
desire to maintain current parking due to the inconvenience of the pending
restrictions. Council referred this issue back to the Traffic Safety Committee for
further study and review.
Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 1 of 2
July 6, 2006
After further evaluation, in an effort to balance the parking restrictions with safety,
prohibiting parking only at the restrictive locations in lieu of the entire corridor
appropriately accommodates emergency access needs. The less restrictive
parking prohibitions include extending the existing no parking zone along the
north side of W. 60th St. adjacent to the school westerly to Ruth Drive and also
posting a no parking zone thru the 90- degree curve on the north and west sides.
This compromise would impose fewer restrictions to the residents of School
Road and would also meet the requirements of emergency service vehicles.
Staff recommends that "No Parking Anytime" signs be placed on the north
side of School Road, from the west side of the Concord School parking lot
to Ruth Drive, and on the northwest sides of School Road from the west lot
line of 4808 to the middle lot of 4816 School Road.
SECTION B:
Requests on which staff recommends denial of request:
1. Request to remove the No Parking Anytime signs from the north side of West
49th Street between Westbrook Lane and Brookside Avenue.
Requestor is a resident on West 49th Street who feels that the No Parking
Anytime signs on the north side of the street should be taken down. He states
that these signs are violated on a regular basis by neighbors and their guests
and that they are seldom enforced.
West 49th Street is a 30 -foot wide City Street with curb and gutter and no
sidewalks. Current parking restrictions are "No Parking Anytime" on the north
side of the street. There are no parking restrictions on the south side. The
Monday — Friday average daily traffic count is 339 vehicles with an 85 percentile
speed of 31 m.p.h. There have been no pedestrian or vehicle accidents reported
in the past 5- years.
A similar request was made in October 1986. At that time Engineering
recommended that the No Parking restrictions remain. This portion of West 49
Street is a main entrance to the neighborhood. Restricting parking to one side of
the street ensures efficient traffic flow, especially during the winter months. One
side parking also increases visibility at the Rail Road tracks just to the east of
Brookside.
Brookside Avenue.
SECTION C:
Requests that are deferred to a later date or referred to others.
None for the July 6, 2006 meeting.
Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 2 of 2
July 6, 2006
4,95 /A,l'U
y 11, 2006
a
School Road Area Residents City Of Edina
Edina, MN.
Re: Restricted Parking on School Road
City of Edina
Dear resident:
On June 12, 2006, you received a letter from me regarding the Fire Marshal's request to
restrict parking on School Road, to the west of Concord School (north side only) around
the curve (west side only) to W. 60d' Street. The letter stated that you could come and
speak to the City Council regarding this issue. Two residents appeared before the
Council on 07/05/06 to voice disagreement about restricting the entire street. As a result,
this matter was sent back to the Traffic Safety Committee for further study and review.
After consulting with these two residents, the Fire Marshal and City staff, the following
proposal was drafted and will be presented to Council at their regular City Council
meeting on July 18, 2006, at 7:00 p.m.
The Traffic Safety Committee's recommendation to Council will be to restrict parking on
School Road on the north side, from the western entrance /exit of the Concord School
parking lot west to Ruth Drive (due to the narrow street width), and along the north/west
sides from the western lot line of 4808 to the middle of the lot of 4816 School Road
(due to the 90- degree curve). The restriction will be "No Parking Anytime ".
The Fire Marshal is concerned about the ability to get emergency vehicles down School
Road during events at Concord School due to the narrowing of the street when vehicles
are parked on both sides. Staff feels that this restriction is necessary to ensure the safety
of the residents on School Road.
This recommendation will be presented to the City Council at its regular meeting on
Tuesday, July 18, 2006, at 7:00 p.m. Please contact me by Friday, July 14, 2006, at 952-
826 -0349 or e-mail at btate@ci.edina.mn.us if you wish to speak before the Council on
this issue.
Sincerely,
o.
Boyd ate
Traffic Safety Coordinator
City Hall 952 - 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390
EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379
q( i�� MEMORANDUM
•�JV:% CITY OF EDINA
DATE: August 11, 2004
TO: Craig Larsen — City Planner
FROM: Wayne Houle — City Engineer
SUBJECT: "No Parking" Signs on West 49th Street between Westbrook Lane &
Brookside Avenue
Engineering has reviewed the above "No Parking" signs. West 49th Street is the only access
into this neighborhood and is a 30 -foot wide roadway; this provides ample room for two -way
traffic and parking on one side of the roadway. No parking restrictions currently exist on the
northerly side of the roadway. These signs were installed prior to 1972 since our records
reflect the following:
■ 12/13/72 — Request to remove the "No Parking" signs along West 49th Street.
o Committee recommended denial until other traffic improvements in a-
accomplished.
■ 12/13/77 — Request to remove "No Parking" signs at 5115 -5121 West 49th Street
o Committee recommended approval of removal.
■ 10/14/86 —Request for "No Parking" signs at 5105 West 49th Street.
o Committee recommended approval of installation.
Engineering recommends that "No Parking" restrictions remain on this portion of West 49th
Street.
r�1 .
F
1
Or _
oil
59TH ST W
viWill
f LO
r 11 i►�trr I
SRHOOL RD
!1
ki
60TH ST
. {° Ana,
Legend N
ccoc Proposed No Parking Anytime
No Parking Anytime W E
No Parking, M -F 7 -9 S
No Parking School Days
Nothing Posted Engineering Dept
July, 2006
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
Mayor & City Council
From: ( J-
Steven L. Lillehaug
Information Only
Assistant City Engineer
Date:
July 18, 2006
Subject:
NE Edina Transportation
Action
Study — Schedule
Transportation Commission to
Hold Public Hearing and 30-
Day Comment Period.
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
V.F.
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑ To HRA
® To Council
Action
® Motion
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Authorize the Transportation Commission to conduct a public hearing on the NE Edina
Transportation Study final draft report. Upon completion of the final hearing, the
Commission will receive written comments for 30 days after which the Commission will
formalize its final recommendation. The Transportation Commission public hearing is
tentatively scheduled for July 31, 2006. Council consideration of the final report will
occur in October.
Info /Background:
The NE Edina Transportation Study commenced in late 2005. After six study advisory
committee meetings, numerous Transportation Commission meetings, two business
representative meetings and three Open Houses, the study is nearing completion. The
Final DRAFT NE Edina Transportation Study Report is complete and has been
recommended for public input. Following the above referenced schedule and events, a
DVD of the Public Hearing, written comments received during the 30 -day comment
period and the Transportation Commission's recommendation and final report will be
presented to the Council for consideration.
G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Transportation Commission\Agendas\2006_R&R \rr to CC 7- 18- 06.doc
CITY OF EDINA
716Pc.._., 8:07:42
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 1
7/6/2006
-7/6/2006
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
- Business Unit
286069 7/6/2006
102403 AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT
105.85
BLACK DIRT 00001417 139184
25460
1318.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
105.85
286070 716/2006
101304 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY
2,481.45
INSTALL TOMMYGATE 00001065 139477
0107246 -IN
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
330.30
PAINT, REPAIRS 00001070 139478
0107247 -IN
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
DISTRIBUTION
2,811.75
286071 71612006
119577 ACCESS COMMUNICATIONS INC.
500.00
REGISTER FIBER LOCATES 139535
7191
1554.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
500.00
286072 7/6/2006
102971 ACE ICE COMPANY
40.84
139319
473900
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
22.12
139320
472341
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
63.96
139321
473869
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
35.56
139322
606519
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
85.24
139625
472342
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
72,68
139626
473899
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
30.28
139627
606517
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
52.68
139628
606557
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
25.56
139629
606559
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
428.92
286073 7/612006
102191 ADVANCED GRAPHIC SYSTEMS INC.
223.49
TONER 139479
INV00069620
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
223.49
286074 7/612006
102626 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES
379.41
READY MIX 00005917 139246
4154294
1314.6520
CONCRETE
STREET RENOVATION
934.54
READY MIX 00005917 139480
4155314
1314.6520
CONCRETE
STREET RENOVATION
648.99
CONCRETE FOR BENCHES 00005917 139481
4155581
1647.6517
SAND GRAVEL & ROCK
PATHS & HARD SURFACE
1,962.94
286075 716/2006
119786 AIRGAS NORTH CENTRAL
21.40
TORCH BODY REPAIR 00001909 139185
105622986
1553.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN .
57.35
EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 00001910 139186
105622987
1553.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
78.75
286076 716/2006
111228 ALDEN POOL & MUNICIPAL SUPPLY
683.71
REPAIR OF FX 1 00001895 139247
600452
5915.6530
REPAIR PARTS
WATER TREATMENT
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation
CITY OF EDINA'
Council Check Register
716/2006 -7/6/2006
PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
., e
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PRINTING
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
COST OF GOODS SOLD
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GENERAL SUPPLIES
7/6/2006 8:07:42
Page - 2 -
Business Unit
ARENA ADMINISTRATION
CENTENNIAL LAKES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
COMMUNICATIONS
COMMUNICATIONS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
GRILL
GRILL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
683.71
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
286077 71612006
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
100575 ALL SAFE INC.
228.49
EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 00008063 139248
72664
5510.6610
149.70
EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 00002031 139536
72665
5630.6406
378.19
286078 716/2006
102715 ALLEGRA PRINT & IMAGING
665.77
2005 CAFR 139443
61250
1550.6575
665.77
286079 7/6/2006
103357 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO INC.
88.25
LISTEN DEVICE REPAIR 139187
SVCINVO6267
2210.6103
2,366.53
SCALA MAINT & SUPPORT 00004095 139537
INV66021
2210.6103
2,454.78
286080 716/2006
101874 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC.
964.75
ERT HEADSETS 00003022 139538
43529
1400.6710
964.75
286081 7/6/2006
102109 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER
1,720.94
RADIO INSTALL R -91 139482
69473
1470.6180
199.59
PAGER REPAIRS 139483
69477
1470.6180
113.17
RADIO REPAIRS 139616
69377
1470.6180
2,033.70
286082 71612006
102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE
1,068.15
FOOD 00006333 139249
591414
5421.5510
27.21
FOOD 139368
592549
5421.5510
1,095.36
286083 7/612006
103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS
136.50
COFFEE 139622
402270
1550.6406
136.50
286084 71612006
102134 ASHWORTH INC.
129.37
MERCHANDISE 00006475 139369
702171
5440.5511
797.42
MERCHANDISE 00006485 139370
736662
5440.5511
168.34
MERCHANDISE 00006485 139371
745433
5440.5511
36.77
MERCHANDISE 00006485 139372
744273
5440.5511
1,131.90
., e
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PRINTING
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
COST OF GOODS SOLD
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GENERAL SUPPLIES
7/6/2006 8:07:42
Page - 2 -
Business Unit
ARENA ADMINISTRATION
CENTENNIAL LAKES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
COMMUNICATIONS
COMMUNICATIONS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
GRILL
GRILL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
`
IL
CITY OF EDINA
7 /6 /2uu6 8:07:42
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 3
7/6/2006
- 7/6/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
286085
7/6/2006
101405 ASSET RECOVERY CORP.
105.88
RECYCLING SERVICES
139623
6507692 -IN
1550.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
105.88
286086
716/2006
106015 ATHLETICA INC.
8,520.00
GAMEPLEX RINK SYSTEM
00007040 139539
SO- 8630 -2
1646.6577
LUMBER
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
8,520.00
286087
716/2006
101954 AUGIE'S INC.
59.27
FOOD
00006324 139373
6247
5430.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
59.27
286088
7/6/2006
105281 BALCH & COMPANY
1,500.00
TV SHOW & WEBSITE
139250
622
5410.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
1,500.00
286089
7/6/2006
100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO.
3,560.00
SANITARY SEWER MODEL
139444
2327673 -6
5932.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
GENERAL STORM SEWER
693.00
STORM WATER MGMT
139445
2327354 -140
5932.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
GENERAL STORM SEWER
4,253.00
286090
7/6/2006
102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC.
102.59
TRACTOR BATTERY
139374
C1053
5422.6530
REPAIR PARTS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
200.33
BATTERIES
00001528 139484
C1054
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
123.67
BATTERIES
00001532 139485
C1094
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
426.59
286091
7/6/2006
101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION
371,88
139323
37492400
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
1,063.50
139324
37492200
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
24.10
139325
41687400
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
79,26
139326
41687300
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
715.35
139327
37492500
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
139.95
139328
41687500
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
23.10
139630
41706400
5860.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
216.03
139631
41672000
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
103.16
139632
41706300
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
182,10
139633
37533400
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
97.10
139634
37533500
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
3,015.53
286092
7/6/2006
100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS
R55CKREG LOG20000
BELTS, FILTERS
00001716
CITY OF EDINA
882375
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT
Council Check Register
GEN
61.56
IDLER ASSEMBLY
00001718
716/2006
--7/6/2006
1553.6530
Check # Date Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
174.12
OFFICE SUPPLIES
00003019 139188
WO- 409303 -1
1400.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
18.64
OFFICE SUPPLIES
00003019 139189
W0409303-2
1400.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
4.25
HIGHLIGHTERS
139251
W0409462-2
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
8.35
OFFICE SUPPLIES
139252
WO- 409730 -1
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
26.27
DUSTERS, POST -IT -NOTES
00001929 139375
WO- 409875 -1
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
81.47
FUSER
00001925 139376
OE- 58907 -1
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
40.51
OFFICE SUPPLIES
00003607 139486
OE- 58621 -1
1470.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
43.45
OFFICE SUPPLIES
00003023 139540
W0410072 -1
1400.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
143.71
INK CARTRIDGES
00003023 139541
OE- 60346 -1
1400.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
73.43
OFFICE SUPPLIES
00003019 139542
W0409303-3
1400.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
73.43
OFFICE SUPPLIES
00003019 139543
OE- 58878 -1
1400.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
687.63
286093 7/6/2006
102392 BLACK, STEVE
7/612006 8:07:42
Page - 4
- Business Unit
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
DISTRIBUTION
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
279.00 OFFICIATING FEES 139607 063006 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
279.00
286094 716/2006 119431 BLINK BONNIE
134.47 BOX LUNCHES 139253 062006 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL
134.47
286095 716/2006 100711 BLOOD, DAVID
100.00 POLICE SERVICE 139176 070106 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM
100.00
286096 7/6/2006 119631 BONNER & BORHART LLP
14,906.25 PROSECUTING 139446 27339 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES
14,906.25
286097 7/6/2006 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS
131.14
BELTS, FILTERS
00001716
139190
882375
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT
OPERATION
GEN
61.56
IDLER ASSEMBLY
00001718
139191
882922
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT
OPERATION
GEN
26.84
CLAMP
00001719
139192
883412
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT
OPERATION
GEN
28.54
HORN ASSEMBLY
00001529
139193
884025
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT
OPERATION
GEN
127.80 -
CREDIT
00001524
139194
879066CR
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT
OPERATION
GEN
120.28
286098 7/6/2006
104470 BRIDGESTONE
GOLF INC.
136.92
GOLF BALLS
00006104
139254
1001356030
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
136.92
286099 7/6/20' 100776 BUTLER, GEORGE
7/6,_ , 8:07:42
Page - 5
Business Unit
RESERVE PROGRAM
COMMUNICATIONS
3,769.35
139329
100978
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
R55CKREG LOG20000
73.30
139330
CITY OF -NA
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
152.10
Council Check Register
100977
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
7/612006 -7/6/2006
139332
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
21.60
100.00
POLICE SERVICE
139175 070106 1419.6102
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
2,014.04
100.00
062206
1551.6186
HEAT
286100 71612006
5590919 -6 139377
115346 CALHOUN BEACH FRAMING
7413.6582
FUEL OIL
2,073.55
133.75
PHOTO CONTEST FRAMING
139544 062906 2210.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
286104 7/6/2006
133.75
ADVERTISING OTHER
242.00
286101 7/6/2006
119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES
286107 716/2006
7/6,_ , 8:07:42
Page - 5
Business Unit
RESERVE PROGRAM
COMMUNICATIONS
3,769.35
139329
100978
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
73.30
139330
100979
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
152.10
139331
100977
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
7143.50
139332
100976
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
11,138.25
286102 716/2006
100681 CATCO
100256 CINGULAR WIRELESS
88.98
FITTINGS 00001518 139255
3 -06616
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
88.98
5420.6188
TELEPHONE
22.67
286103 7/6/2006
112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY
286106 71612006
21.60
5596524 -8 139257
2006JUN19
5430.6186
HEAT
2,014.04
5591458 -4 139258
062206
1551.6186
HEAT
37.91
5590919 -6 139377
6/22/06
7413.6582
FUEL OIL
2,073.55
ADVERTISING OTHER
80.68
ADVERTISING
139195
286104 7/6/2006
119725 CH15AGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO
ADVERTISING OTHER
242.00
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
CITY HALL GENERAL
PSTF FIRE TOWER
482 50 139333 315232 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING
482.50
286105 71612006
100256 CINGULAR WIRELESS
22,67
139256
061706
5420.6188
TELEPHONE
22.67
286106 71612006
103040 CITY PAGES
80.66
ADVERTISING
139195
100158411
5822.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
80.66
ADVERTISING
139195
100158411.
5642.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
80.68
ADVERTISING
139195
100158411
5862.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
242.00
286107 716/2006
116158 CLARK, ANN.
CLUB HOUSE
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
131.00 SKATING CLASS REFUND 139488 062806 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
131.00
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
-
Council Check. Register
7/6/2006
--7/6/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
286108
716/2006
110691. CLARK, ROBERT E.
11.00
DOG LICENSE REFUND 139487
062906
1400.4120
DOG LICENSES
11.00
286109
7/612006
100088 COLE INFORMATION SERVICES
328.95
LEASE DIRECTORY 139196
0432260 -IN
1400.6151
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
328.95
286110
7/612006
101345 COLOURS
493.00
FLYER DESIGN 139545
9578
2210.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
493.00
286111
7/612006
118457 COLUMBIA HEIGHTS PARK & REC
15.38
REFUND 139546
062806
5300.2039
SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE
236.62
REFUND 139546
062806
5301.4541
GENERAL ADMISSIONS
252.00
286112
7/612006
101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS
275.09
GLOVES, EARPLUGS 00001875 139547
02842911
1301.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
69.83
SAFETY GLASSES, LOTION 00001899 139548
02844964
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
344.92
286113
7/612006
103171 CORPORATE ADVERTISING & INCENT
324.69
NAME TAGS 139197
97918
5311.6201
LAUNDRY
324.69
286114
7/6/2006
119953 CREATIVE RESOURCES AGENCY LLC
619.52
T- SHIRTS 139619
9121
1624.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
619.52
286115
716/2006
119899 CREEKSIDE SOILS
1,680.81
MULCH 00001778 139489
22442 -9598
1644.6541
PLANTINGS & TREES
1,680.81
286116
7/612006
119933 DATA DEVICES INTERNATIONAL
2,590.00
HD/TAPE DEGAUSSER 00004366 139198
7397
1554.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
2,590.00
286117
71612006
102285 DAVANNIS
62.25
FOOD FOR VP MOTORCADE 139199
167979
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
62.25
7/6/2006 8:07:42
Page - 6
Business Unit
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
COMMUNICATIONS
AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET
AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
POOL OPERATION
PLAYGROUND & THEATER
TREES & MAINTENANCE
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
CITY Oh -,iNA
7/6,_. _. 8:07:42
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check
Register
Page - 7
7/6/2006
-- 7/6/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
- Business Unit
286118
7/6/2006
102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING
1,028.00
139334
367967
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
19.80
139335
367968
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
261.00
139336
367274
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
19.80
139337
367971
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
4,938.54
139338
367970
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
4,790.90
139635
367964
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
58.80
139636
367965
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
11,116.84
286119
7/6/2006
102455 DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES INC
177.32
STEPS FOR FORD VAN
00001459 139259
4- 097440
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
177.32
286120
716/2006
100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY
97.60
BAKERY
139260
218223
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
38.58
BAKERY
139549
218676
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
59.62
BAKERY
139550
218746
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
195.80
286121
7/6/2006
102831 DEX MEDIA EAST
469.30
139551
304855544
5610.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
ED ADMINISTRATION
18.00
139552
304855498
5430.6188
TELEPHONE
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
108.80
139552
304855498
5420.6188
TELEPHONE
CLUB HOUSE
132.50
139552
304855498
5511.6188
TELEPHONE
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
728.60
286122
7/6/2006
101766 DISPLAY SALES
429.20
FLAGS
00001772 139261
INVO044725
1647.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PATHS & HARD SURFACE
429.20
286123
7/6/2006
119943 DOCHERTY, PATRICIA
81.00
SKATING CLASS REFUND
139490
062806
5511.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
81.00
286124
7/6/2006
102934 DON HARSTAD CO INC
298.80
CARD READER
00001303 139262
122047.
1646.6530
REPAIR PARTS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
298.80
286125
7/6/2006
119934 DONALDSON COMPANY INC.
605.50
REPAIR FILTERS
00008046 139200
4627461
5511.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
605.50
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
7/6/2006 -7/612 006
7/6/2006 8:07:42
Page - 8
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
286126 716/2006
100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
9,250.30
LEGAL
139553
1327716
1195.6131
PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL
LEGAL SERVICES
9,250.30
286127 7/6/2006
100739 EAGLE WINE
200.50
139339
427905
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
289.61
139637
431602
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
913.01
139638
431607
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
- 34.40
139639
431606
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
3,579.92
139640
431597
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
543.40
139641
431398
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
8.65-
139642
696287
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
14.63-
139643
696110
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
5,537.56
286128 7/6/2006
100741 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
55.00
139340
672339
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
1,680.00
139341
320675
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
290.20
139378
219554
5421.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
GRILL
622.00
139379
18773
5421.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
GRILL
48.00
139644
320761
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
7,216.10
139645
320649
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
74.50
139646
320743
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
3,589.45
139647
320742
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
3,260.15
139648
320740
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
18.50
139649
320738
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
16,853.90
286129 7/612006
105467 EDINA CRIME PREVENTION FUND
3,700.00
ART FAIR CREDIT CARD RECEIPTS
139263
062806
5101.4607
CLASS REGISTRATION
ART CENTER REVENUES
3,700.00
286130 716/2006
114520 EIDEM, JOHN
56.25
LIQUOR DECOY
139554
062806
1424.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
LIQUOR INSPECTION
56.25
286131 716/2006
105944 EMANUEL, LOU
279.00
OFFICIATING FEES
139608
063006
4077.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
279.00
286132 716/20
101956 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANC
CITY OF __AA
7/6t. _
R55CKREG LOG20000
_8:07:42
CouncilCheck.Register
Page- 9
7/6/2006
-7/6/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
474.20
T -90 PUMP REPAIRS
139491
26308
1470.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
923.80
E -81 PUMP REPAIRS
139492
26295
1470.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1.398.00
286133
716/2006
104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC
98.35
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
00003590 139493
INV842578
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
98.35
286134
7/612006
105339 ENRGI
356.25
WEBSITE GRAPHICS
139201
4488
2210.6124
WEB DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNICATIONS
772.50
WEBSITE MAINTENANCE
139555
4492
2210.6124
- WEB DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNICATIONS
1.128.75
286135
716/2006
116303 ETONIC WORLDWIDE LLC
168.45
MERCHANDISE
00006110 139380
52418
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
168.45
286136
716/2006
102179 EULL'S MANUFACTURING CO INC.
291.80
MANHOLE BRICK
00001506 139381
65684
5932.6530
REPAIR PARTS
GENERAL STORM SEWER
507.77
CATCH BASINS
00001663 139382
65891
5932.6530
REPAIR PARTS
GENERAL STORM SEWER
799.57
286137
716/2006
104832 EVENT SOUND & LIGHTING
138.45
SPEAKER REPAIRS
00001840 139494
742
1627.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SPECIAL ACTIVITIES
138.45
286138
71612006
100756 FEDERAL EXPRESS
27.52
SHIPPING CHARGES
139202
1- 077 -64893
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
27.52
286139
7/6/2006
100759 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY
58.04
KEY BOXES
00001915 139495
52649
1322.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
58.05
KEY BOXES
00001915 139495
52649
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
116.09
286140
716/2006
115314 GALAXY COMPUTER INC.
639.00
FUSER KITS
139556
1302
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
639.00
286141
7/6/2006
101270 GANDER MOUNTAIN
495.77
UNIFORMS
139496
361 -7728
1640.6201
LAUNDRY
PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL
495.77
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
7/6/2006 8:07:42
Council Check Register
Page - 10
7/6/2006
--7/6/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
- Business Unit
286142
7/6/2006
102419 GARDEN & ASSOCIATES INC
330.00
INTERPRETER
139203
47358
1400.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
330.00
286143
7/6/2006
119945 GEBHARDT, SUSAN
172.00
SKATING CLASS REFUND
139497
062806
5511.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
172.00
286144
7/6/2006
105508 GEMPLER'S INC.
299.00
ROLLING MEASURE, HOSE RACK
00002192 139557
1008109805
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
299.00
286145
71612006
101344 GLENN REHBEIN COMPANIES
1,192.80
FERTILIZER
00001749 139264
9789
1643.6540
FERTILIZER
GENERAL TURF CARE
1,192.80
286146
716/2006
119936 GLOBAL OAK
975.00
WEBSITE MAINTENANCE
139204
325
2210.6124
WEB DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNICATIONS
975.00
286147
7/6/2006
100779 GOPHER CASH REGISTER
31.95
PAPER ROLLS
00006303 139383
24903
5430.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
253.47
REGISTER PAPER
00006315 139558
24908
5410.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
285.42
286148
7/612006
102645 GRAFFITI CONTROL SERVICES
800.00
REMOVE PAINT SPILL
00001900 139498
00001417
1642.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
FIELD MAINTENANCE
800.00
286149
7/6/2006
101103 GRAINGER
141.99
V -BELT, FUSES
00008056 139205
9123821598
5511.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
34.97
V -BELTS
00008060 139206
9123738065
5511.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
16.15
PAINT
00001874 139265
9126570150
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
71.01
SPRAY PAINT
00001874 139384
9126570176
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
19.00
BATTERIES
00001873 139385
9126570168
1120.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ADMINISTRATION
169.23
SPOTLIGHTS
00001873 139385
9126570168
5923.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COLLECTION SYSTEMS
452.35
286150
716/2006
102599 GRANITE CITY ROOFING
223.00
ROOF REPAIRS
00005426 139386
60047
1552.6530
REPAIR PARTS
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
223.00
CITY OF -.nNA
7 /61.__., 8:07:42
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 11
7/6/2006
--7/6/2006
Check # Date
Amount
Suppller / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
- Business Unit
286151 7/6/2006
102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC
916.25
139342
82747
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
183.50
139650
82922
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
167.50
139651
82961
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
563.50
139652
82921
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,830.75
286152 7/6/2006
100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
INC.
30.03
INDUSTRIAL TAPE
00001809 139387
918270833
5911.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PUMP 8 LIFT STATION OPER
30.03
286153 7/6/2006
100785 GREUPNER, JOE
10,050.00
3RD QTR RETAINER
139266
062706
5410.6132
PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
10,050.00
286154 7/6/2006
100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
1,107.44
139343
431604
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
34.40
139344
431603
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
3,559.72
139345
428123
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
5,305.15
139346
424648
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
193.75-
139347
696178
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
111.75-
139348
695802
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
25.95-
139349
696299
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
4.50
139653
431550
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
8.10
139654
431549
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
91.44
139655
431599
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
31.90
139656
428120
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
61.67
139657
428122
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
3,036.81
139658
431600
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
339.89
139659
431609
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
3,302.62
139660
431610
5842.5512
COST OF GOQDS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
243.53-
139661
696361
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING '
16,308.66
286155 7/612006
103359 HANSON PIPE & PRODUCTS INC.
552.74
BASE SLAB, CATCH BASIN
00001907 139388
477006396624
5932.6536
CASTINGS
GENERAL STORM SEWER
276.90
CATCH BASIN
00001908 139389
477006396700
5932.6536
CASTINGS
GENERAL STORM SEWER
829.64
286156 7/6/2006
100797 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT
1,408.36
POOL CHEMICALS
00007093 139499
820117
5311.6545
CHEMICALS
POOL OPERATION
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
7/6/2006 8:07:42
Council Check Register
Page - 12 —
716/2006
—7/6/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
- --
Business Unit
1,408.36
286157
7/6/2006
119474 HAY DOBBS
2,189.09
ARCHITECT FEE
139618
6004.002 -2
45008.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION
2,189.09
286156
716/2006
100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
2,557.52
MAY 2006
139447
001464
1195.6225
BOARD & ROOM PRISONER
LEGAL SERVICES
2,557.52
286159
7/6/2006
106371 HENNEPIN FACULTY ASSOCIATES
2,265.17
MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES
139182
070106
1470.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
2,265.17
286160
7/6/2006
100805 HIRSHFIELD'S
14.90
PAINT
00001877 139207
003165499
1318.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
140.71
PAINT
00006311 139267
003166206
5422.6530
REPAIR PARTS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
74.53
SEALER
00001886 139390
003165729
5915.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
WATER TREATMENT
230.14
286161
7/6/2006
102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURI
476.06
FIELD MARKING PAINT
00005874 139268
72008
1642.6544
LINE MARKING POWDER
FIELD MAINTENANCE
476.06
286162
7/612006
119950 HORAN- HENGEL, MEGAN
1.09
REFUND,
139559
062906
5300.2039
SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE
AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET
16.91
REFUND
139559
062906
5301.4541
GENERAL ADMISSIONS
AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES
18.00
286163
7/6/2006
100808 HORWATH, THOMAS
339.98
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
139269
062206
1644.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
TREES & MAINTENANCE
339.98
2861.64
7/612006
102114 HUEBSCH
37.96
RUG CLEANING
139560
651220
5620.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
EDINBOROUGH PARK
37.90
286165
7/612006
104822 HYDRO LOGIC
222.87
IRRIGATION PARTS
00001834 139270
0232036 -IN
1643.6530
REPAIR PARTS
GENERAL TURF CARE
62.80
CLAMPS, CRIMPER
00001777 139271
0231758 -IN
1643.6530
REPAIR PARTS
GENERAL TURF CARE
285.67
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY L. -iNA
Council Check Register
7/6/2006 -7/6/2006
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
286166 7/6/2006 100812. IAAO
175.00 DUES - DIANE KOOLE 139208 062706 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING
7 /t- 8:07:42
Page - 13
175.00
286167 716/2006
112628 ICEE COMPANY, THE
1,137.90
CONCESSION PRODUCT
139272
739507
5320.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
POOL CONCESSIONS
1,137.90
286168 716/2006
100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP.
258.88
PVC PIPE, FITTINGS 00001895
139391
440695
5915.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
WATER TREATMENT
258.88
286169 7/6/2006
101732 INDUSTRIAL DOOR CO. INC.
102.50
DOOR SERVICE
139561
0113817 -IN
1470.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
259.18
DOOR ADJUSTMENTS
139562
0113837 -IN
1400.6215
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
361.68
286170 716/2006
101400 JAMES, WILLIAM F
100.00
POLICE SERVICE
139180
070106
1419.6102
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
RESERVE PROGRAM
100.00
286172 716/2006
100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.
62.50
139662
1095188
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
54.33
139663
1098821
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
371.10
139664
1098819
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
323.86
139665
1098823
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
190.56
139666
1098810
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
605.71
139667
1098808
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
3,713.89
139668
1098811
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,276.71
139669
1098807
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
3,761.49
139670
1098813
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
206.12
139671
1098812
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
4,256.48
139672
1098815
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
2,424.67
139673
1098817
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
2,164.71
139674
1098822
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
161.55
139675
1098820
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
4,659.48
139676
1098818
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
605.71
139677
1098809
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
1,825,97
139678
.1099804
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
475.45
139679
1098802
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
366.67
139680
1098800
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
.69
139681
1098804
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/6/2006 8:07:42
Council Check Register Page - 14
7/6/2006
-- 7/6/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Suble_dger Account Description
Business Unit
233.68
139682
1098801
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
34.02
139683
1098806
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
506.18
139684
1098805
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
2,066.79
139685
1098803
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
10.67-
139686
314623
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
10.67-
139687
314666
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
6.89-
139688
314667
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
30,340.09
286173
7/6/2006
106243 K9 STORM INCORPORATED
1,860.35
CUSTOMS BROKERAGE FEES
139448
VS3042
4607.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION
1,860.35
286174
716/2006
103449 KAMPA, TINA
218.45
PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES
139500
062906
1624.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PLAYGROUND & THEATER
218.45
286175
716/2006
100553 KEEHR, GREGORY
46.21
TASTING CUPS
139209
062606
5862.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
VERNON SELLING
76.90
TASTING CUPS
139209
062606
5842.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
YORK SELLING
123.11
286176
7/6/2006
111018 KEEPRS INC.
224.80
UNIFORMS
00003612 139501
54252
1470.6558
DEPT UNIFORMS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
135.80
UNIFORMS
00003538 139502
54061 -01
1470.6558
DEPT UNIFORMS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
490.80
UNIFORMS 0
00003538 139503
54061
1470.6558
DEPT UNIFORMS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
851.40
286177
716/2006
119940 KELLY, RAY
26.10
AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT
139449
062806
1470.4329
AMBULANCE FEES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
26.10
286178
7/6/2006
119768 KEOMED INC.
1,061.35
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
00003555 139504
IVC10045
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1,061.35
.
286179
7/6/2006
118397 KLEIN UNDERGROUND LLC
2,400.00
WATER HOLE RESTORATION
00001871 139392
21890
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
DISTRIBUTION
2,350.00
WATER HOLE RESTORATION
00001876 139393
21891
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
DISTRIBUTION
4,750.00
286180
7/6/20'
100002 KLM ENGINEERING INC.
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF ruINA
Council Check Register
7/6/2006 - 7/6/2006
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
17,125.00 FIELD INSPECTION 139450 2949 05435.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION
7/61- 8:07:42
Page - 15
Business Unit
VANVALK WATER TOWER REHAB
17,125.00
286181
7/6/2006
119952 KOHS, HEATHER
421.15
CHEER CLINIC FEES
139620
063006
1600.4390.25
CHEERLEEDING CAMP
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
421.15
286182
7/6/2006
119947 KRAEMER MINING & MATERIALS INC
-
583.43
RIVER ROCK
00001878 139505
174996
5913.6517
SAND GRAVEL & ROCK
DISTRIBUTION
583.43
286183
71612006
114522 KRULL, JOHN
41.25
LIQUOR DECOY
139563
062806
1424.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
LIQUOR INSPECTION
41.25
286184
7/6/2006
101220 LAND EQUIPMENT INC.
1,437.75
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
00001923 139394
149291
5913.6151
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
DISTRIBUTION
1,437.75
286185
716/2006
102111 LASER TECHNOLOGY INC.
107.04
LASER REPAIR
139210
39900RI
1400.6215
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
107.04
286186
7/6/2006
100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
313.06
CLAMPS, SCREWS, TY -RAP
00001812 139395
4556798
1553.6585
ACCESSORIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
410.83
WASHERS, HOSE, WIRE
00001812 139396
4556799
1553.6585
ACCESSORIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
99.22
DRILL BITS
00001812 139397
4556800
1553.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
276.83
HOSE CLAMPS, FITTINGS
00001901 139564
4573965
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1,099.94
286187
7/6/2006
100853 LEEF SERVICES
33.21
SHOP TOWELS
139398
1158171
5422.6201
LAUNDRY
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
33.21
286188
7/6/2006
100855 LESCO INC.
92.12
SEED
00001428 139506
14089750
5913.6543
SOD & BLACK DIRT
DISTRIBUTION
22.24
MULCH
00001792 139507
14205938
5913.6543
SOD & BLACK DIRT
DISTRIBUTION
87.33
SEED
00001782 139508
14205839
5913.6543
SOD & BLACK DIRT
DISTRIBUTION
606.18
FUNGICIDE
00006462 139509
06E92EFE
5422.6545
CHEMICALS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
241.92
CEASEFIRE
00006446 139510
DCF4AFAA
5422.6545
CHEMICALS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
1,049.79
R55CKREG LOG20000
7/6/2006
1190.6105
CITY OF EDINA
1190.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
1190.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
Council Check Register
DUES - LIZ LOPEZ
139511
062906
7/6/2006 --716/2006
10.00
Check # Date Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
286189 716/2006
112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP
139511
062906
854.77
65.00
139350
203006 5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
914.82
CANDY
139351
203084 5320.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
1,845.93
286191
139689
200744 5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
1,263.98
139690
203340 5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
38.03-
139565
139691
203340CR 5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
286190
7/6/2006
1190.6105
114593 MAAP
1190.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
1190.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
10.00
DUES - LIZ LOPEZ
139511
062906
10.00
DUES - MITZI WICKLUND
139511
062906
65.00
CONFERENCE FEE
139511
062906
65.00
CONFERENCE FEE
139511
062906
150.00
286191
7/6/2006
119951 MACK, SAM
56.25
LIQUOR DECOY
139565
062806
56.25
286192
7/6/2006
100868 MARK VII SALES
2,986.69
139352
962515
36.90
139353
962516
4,575.25
139354
963144
36.90
139355
963145
59.85
139356
963146
1,475.75
139692
963644
2,807.70
139693
962789
2,563.22
139694
965463
77.00
139695
965464
14,619.26
286193
7/6/2006
102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC
170.00
ADD EXTENSION
139273
31757
62.50
PROGRAM CHANGE
139274
31777
232.50
286194
7/6/2006
101146 MATRIX TELECOM INC.
265.19
139275
005456301
265.19
286195
71612006
105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS
1190.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
1190.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
1190.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
1190.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
1424.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
5822.5514
5822.5515
5842.5514
5842.5515
5842.5514
5862.5514
5862.5514
5822.5514
5822.5514
1550.6188
1550.6188
1550.6188
2,553.75 LAKE SUPERIOR TRIP 139566 062206 1628.6103.07
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST.OF GOODS SOLD MIX
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
TRIPS PROF SERVICES
7/6/2006 8:07:42
Page - 16
Business Unit
50TH ST SELLING
POOL CONCESSIONS
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
ASSESSING
ASSESSING
ASSESSING
ASSESSING
LIQUOR INSPECTION
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
SENIOR CITIZENS
CITY OF NA
7/61- 8:07:42
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 17
7/6/2006
--716/2006
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Descrlption
- Business Unit
2,553.75
286196 7/612006
101457 MEICHSNER, EARL
98.79
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT.
139276
062306
1652.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
WEED MOWING
98.79
286197 71612006
101483 MENARDS
226.59
SIDING
00001867 139211
35903
1314.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET RENOVATION
10.61
OUTDOOR REMOTE
00006304 139277
36656
5410.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
237.20
286198 7/612006
101987 MENARDS
43.95
RUBBER GLOVES, REMOVER
00002024 139567
3560
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
26.50
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
00002200 139568
3620
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
30.15
SANDPAPER
00002200 139569
2792
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
48.08
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
00002202 139570
3837
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
66.96
ELECTRICAL WIRE
00002202 139571
4414
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
215.64
286199 7/6/2006
100882 MERIT SUPPLY
113.53
LPS I
00001787 139212
69727
1553.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
2,322.72
CLEANER, WASH S WAX
00001453 139572
69792
1553.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
192.55
DEGREASER
00001911 139573
69791
1552.6530
REPAIR PARTS
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
2,628.80
286200 716/2006
101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY
536.12
FIELD PAINT
00001747 139278
92202
1642.6544
LINE MARKING POWDER
FIELD MAINTENANCE
221.31
FIELD PAINT, BB PLATES
00001767 139279
92271
1642.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIELD MAINTENANCE
97.87
FIELD PAINT
00001770 139280
92187
1642.6544
LINE MARKING POWDER -
FIELD MAINTENANCE
35.09
BALL HOPPER
139512
92216
1623.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
TENNIS INSTRUCTION
890.39
286201 7/6/2006
100885 METRO SALES INC
8,342.15
COPIER
00003592 139513
258948
1470.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
750.00
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
139514
219687
1470.6215
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
9,092.15
286202 7/6/2006
100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP.
440.55
ASPHALT
00005909 139515
. 80571MB
1301.6518
BLACKTOP
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
11,198.57
ASPHALT
00005909-139515
80571MB
1314.6518
BLACKTOP
STREET RENOVATION
11,639.12
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
7/6/2006 8:07:42
Council Check Register
Page - 18
7/6/2006
-7/6/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanatlon
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
286203
7/6/2006
100692 MIDWEST COCA -COLA EAGAN
332.00
139357
68061808
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
230.40
139696
68061907
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
562.40
286204
7/612006
103186 MIDWEST FUELS
384.55
DIESEL FUEL
00006071 139399
36797
5422.6581
GASOLINE
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
491.07
DIESEL FUEL
00006071 139400
36446
5422.6581
GASOLINE
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
775.67
FUEL
00006070 139401
36444
5423.6406
tENERAL SUPPLIES
GOLF CARS
843.97
FUEL
00006070 139402
36795
5424.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
RANGE
2,495.26
286205
7/6/2006
101890 MIDWEST VENDING INC
192.08
CANDY
00006338 139574
4617
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
192.08
286206
7/6/2006
100522 MINNESOTA AIR INC.
96.32
LOW PRESSURE CONTROL
00001872 139403
2067616-00
5840.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
96.32
286207
7/612006
118144 MINNESOTA PREMIER PUBLICATIONS
825.00
PARK & REC AD
139575
13881
2210.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
COMMUNICATIONS
825.00
286208
7/6/2006
112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO.
596.40
ASPHALT EMULSION
00005924 139213
50553
1301.6519
ROAD OIL
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
596.40
ASPHALT EMULSION.
00005924 139516
50615
1314.6519
ROAD OIL
STREET RENOVATION
1,192.80
286209
7/612006
100908 MINNESOTA WANNER
36.38
VALVES
00002015 139576
0069318 -IN
5630.6530
REPAIR PARTS
CENTENNIAL LAKES
94.00
STEEL SHELF
00003621 139577
0069402 -IN
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
130.38
286210
716/2006
119770 MONEY MAILER TC SOUTHWEST
380.00
DIRECT MAIL ADVERTISING
139451
195
5822.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
50TH ST SELLING
380.00
DIRECT MAIL ADVERTISING
139451
195
5842.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
YORK SELLING
380.00
DIRECT MAIL ADVERTISING
139451
195
5862.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
VERNON SELLING
1,140.00
286211
716/2006
119547 MOON, JENNI
48.07
OFFICE SUPPLIES
139452
062706
5310.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
POOL ADMINISTRATE'
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF --ANA
Council Check Register
716/2006 --7/6/2006
Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
48.07
286212 71612006 102395 MOSE, WILLIAM
488.25 OFFICIATING FEES 139609 063006 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
70- 8:07:42 -
Page - 19
Business Unit
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT
IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT
IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT
IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
CENTENNIAL LAKES
GENERAL TURF CARE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL CONCESSIONS
TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM
488.25
286213 716/2006
100912 MOTOROLA INC.
2,153.07
MAR -MAY 06 SERVICE
139214
78021768
1400.6230
2,153.07
JUN -AUG 06 SERVICE
139215
78021769
1400.6230
4,306.14
286214 7/6/2006
100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC.
201.93
VALVE BOXES, FUSES
00006454 139404
530095 -00
5422.6611
1,892.19
CONVERSION ASSEMBLIES
00006452 139405
529683 -00
5422.6611
271.58
SERVICE ASSEMBLIES, FUSES
00006454 139406
530095 -01
5422.6611
654.92
MOWER BLADES
00006442 139407
527979 -00
5422.6530
1,202.32
ROLLERS
00006453 139408
530005 -00
5422.6530
553.90
SERVICE ASSEMBLIES
00006454 139409
530095 -02
5422.6611
444.59
SERVICE ASSEMBLIES
00006454 139410
530095 -03
5422.6611
324.74
IRRIGATION PARTS
00002032 139578
532635 -00
5630.6530
36.74
TEES, TOOLS
00001745 139579
528988 -00
1643.6530
5,582.91
286215 7/6/2006
100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO.
1,883.00
139697
38272
5862.5513
445.00
139698
38270
5822.5513
762.00
139699
38271
5842.5513
3,090.00
286216 7/6/2006
103632 NEXT DAY GOURMET /SUPERIOR
PROD.
2,524.05
FREEZER
00007108 139453
8365251
5320.6406
2,524.05
286217 7/6/2006
104672 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
443.87
139216
909583317 -055
1400.6188
421.83
139615
757391129 -043
1470.6188
865.70
286218 7/6/2006
100724 NISSEN, DICK
100.00
POLICE SERVICE
139179
070106
1419.6102
100.00
70- 8:07:42 -
Page - 19
Business Unit
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT
IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT
IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT
IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
CENTENNIAL LAKES
GENERAL TURF CARE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL CONCESSIONS
TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
7/6/2006 8:07:42
Council Check Register
Page - 20
7/6/2006
- 7/6/2006
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
286219 716/2006
104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY
230.84
LIGHT BAR
00001922 139281
10594
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
230.84
286220 71612006
100712 NORTHERN WATERWORKS SUPPLY
850.10
STORZ ADAPTORS
00001487 139517
SO 1020323.001
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
850.10
286221 7/6/2006
100930 NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO.
193.33
TIRE SERVICES
00001644 139217
NW- 102036
1553.6583
TIRES & TUBES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
114.40
REPAIRS
00001644 139518
NW- 101895
1553.6583
TIRES & TUBES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
307.73
286222 7/6/2006
102712 OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOG
495.87
139282
W06050552
5420.6188
TELEPHONE
CLUB HOUSE
17.98
ARNESON
139283
W06050545
1646.6188
TELEPHONE
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
35.96
GREENHOUSE
139283
W06050545
1646.6188
TELEPHONE
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
71.92
139283
W06050545
5821.6188
TELEPHONE
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
73.18
139283
W06050545
5311.6188
TELEPHONE
POOL OPERATION
89.90
CARD ACCESS -PARKS
139283
W06050545
1646.6188
TELEPHONE
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
89.90
139283
W06050545
1550.6188
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
89.90
139283
W06050545
5861.6188
TELEPHONE
VERNON OCCUPANCY
90.23
HISTORICAL
139283
W06050545
1646.6188
TELEPHONE
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
107.88
139283
W06050545
1481.6188
TELEPHONE
YORK FIRE STATION
118.46
139283
W06050545
5210.6188
TELEPHONE
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
119.69
139283
W06050545
5111.6188
TELEPHONE
ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT
143.84
139283
W06050545
5841.6188
TELEPHONE
YORK OCCUPANCY
161.92
139283
W06050545
1622.6188
TELEPHONE
SKATING & HOCKEY
432.57
139283
W06050545
5610.6188
TELEPHONE
ED ADMINISTRATION
2,139.20
286223 7/6/2006
100936 OLSEN COMPANIES
51.07
TURNBUCKLES
00001826 139284
399855
1646.6556
TOOLS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
95.43
RECIPROCATING BLADES
00001820 139285
399335
1646.6556
TOOLS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
419.89
ROPE, EYEBOLTS, CLIPS
00001830 139519
400189
1642.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIELD MAINTENANCE
566.39
286224 7/6/2006
101470 ORVIS, JOAN
7,702.00
SKATING INSTRUCTOR
139520
062806
5510.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ARENA ADMINISTRATION
7,702.00
286225 7/6/20'
100347 PAUSTIS & SONS
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date
286226
7/6/2006
CITY G,
,,NA
5421.5510
7/6,_ , 8:07:42
5630.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
Council Check Register
Page - 21
32385181
7/6/2006
-7/6/2006
139411
Amount Supplier I Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
675.88
139358
8112437 -IN
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
780.81
139700
8113101 -IN
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
288.00
139701
8112962 -IN
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,183.34
139702
8113102 -IN
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,313.72
139703
8113100 -IN
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
286226
7/6/2006
5430.5510
100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
5630.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
115.50
139359
32385181
392.50
139411
32385172
1,233.50
139412
36213075
459.20
139580
32385164
2,200.70
286227
7/612006
119938 PERMATOP
128.25
TOOL BOX COVER 00001338
139286
4190
128.25
286228
7/6/2006
119935 PET CROSSING
83.00
K -9 DENTAL EXAM
139218
86475
83.00
286229
71612006
102406 PETSMART #458
58.58
K -9 GROOMING 00003025
139219
T -7093
58.58
286230
7/6/2006
100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
2,256.99
139704
2344425
94.56
139705
2344423
1,093.31
139706
2344422
671.99
139707
2344420
1,775.26
139708
2344421
1,718.56
139709
2344419
370.85
139710
2344424
485.19
139711
2344418
1,378.73
139712
2344416
223.58
139713
2344417
144.00 -
139714
3340825
286231 7/6/2006 100119 PING
1,119.39 IRONS SETS
5320.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
5430.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
5630.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
1646.6556 TOOLS
4607.6406
4607.6406
5862.5513
5862.5515
5862.5513
5842.5512
5842.5513
5842.5513
5862.5512
5822.5513
5822.5513
5822.5512
5842.5513
00006298 139413 8087839 5440.5511
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
POOL CONCESSIONS
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
GRILL
CENTENNIAL LAKES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION
EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
7/6/2006 8:07:42
Council Check
Register
Page - 22
7/6/2006
- 7/6/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
454.02
GRIPS, METAL WOODS 00006298 139414
8081231
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
1,573.41
286232
7/6/2006
101110 POLLY NORMAN PHOTOGRAPHY
150.00
ABOUT BUSINESS PHOTOS
139581
062206
2210.6123
MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE
COMMUNICATIONS
150.00
286233
7/612006
100961 POSTMASTER
500.00
BRM PERMIT
139287
062706
5910.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
GENERAL (BILLING)
500.00
286234
716/2006
100961 POSTMASTER
500.00
BRM POSTAGE
139521
062906
5910.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
GENERAL (BILLING)
500.00
286235
7/6/2006
100961 POSTMASTER
1,260.00
EDINA ART CENTER
139621
063006
5110.6235
POSTAGE
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
1,260.00
286236
7/6/2006
101434 PRAIRIE EQUIPMENT COMPANY
399.39
REPAIR INVERTER 00001447 139415
4756
1553.6585
ACCESSORIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
399.39
286237
7/612006
100964 PRECISION TURF & CHEMICAL
2,130.00
FUNGICIDE 00006448
139416
27340
5422.6545
CHEMICALS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
2,130.00
286238
71612006
100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY
497.54
139360
431605
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
2,292.62
139715
431601
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
2,298,01
139716
431611
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
45.67-
139717
696328
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
5,042.50
286239
7/612006
100969 PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING ENGINEE
1,475.00
WELL #2 RECONSTRUCT
139454
05023.10
05450.1705.21
CONSULTING INSPECTION
WM-450
3,013.67
RECYCLE TANK INSPECTION
139455
03034.32
05427.1705.21
CONSULTING INSPECTION
PLANT #3 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYST
3,500.00
RECYCLE TANK INSPECTION
139455
03034.32
05425.1705.21
CONSULTING INSPECTION
PLANT #2 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYST
3,500.00
RECYCLE TANK INSPECTION
139455
03034.32
05426.1705.21
CONSULTING INSPECTION
PLANT #4 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYST
11,488.67
286240
7/6/20'
1117721 PROSOURCE EDUCATIONAL SERVICES
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date
286241 716/2006
286242 716/2006
286243 716/2006
286244 7/6/2006
286245 71612006
286246 7/612006
CITY OF _..ANA
Council Check Register
7/6/2006 --7/6/2006
Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
1,443.75 COMPUTER CONSULTING 139582 6061443 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1,443.75
70-- 8:07:42
Page - 23
- Business Unit
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
5511.6250 ALARM SERVICE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
5310.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL ADMINISTRATION
5862.5513
103094 PROTECTION ONE
VERNON SELLING
5822.5512
127.80
12743654 ALARM SERVICE
00008062 139220
061206
127.80
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
5822.5513
101877 PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE
COMPANY
5842.5512
5.31
COBRA
139583
063006
5.31
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
5842.5513
104669 PURE BLUE
YORK SELLING
5862.5513
350.48
RETAIL ITEMS
139584
70147
350.48
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
5822.5514
100971 QUALITY WINE
50TH ST SELLING
5862.5512
2,467.35
VERNON SELLING
139361
725184 -00
274.27
5862.5513
139362
725118 -00
162.30
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
139363
724801 -00
228.00
YORK SELLING
139364
721779 -00
113.15-
139365
712010 -00
3,311.26
139718
725117 -00
1,790.85
139719
724154 -00
753.51
139720
724812 -00
367.45
139721
724693 -00
73.15
139722
724695-00
1,411.77
139723
724814 -00
1,527.50
139724
724156 -00
32.34
139725
724155 -00
2,345.53
139726
725138 -00
455.75-
139727
723490-00
28.51-
139728
716550 -00
28.67-
139729
721547 -00
84.10-
139730
716548 -00
14,035.10
101965 QWEST
112.20
952 920 -8166
139522
8166 -6/06
112.20
100466 R & R PRODUCTS INC.
775.00
VERTI -CUT UNIT
00006445 139417
CD848983
70-- 8:07:42
Page - 23
- Business Unit
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
5511.6250 ALARM SERVICE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
5310.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL ADMINISTRATION
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
7/6/2006 -7/6/2006
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
148.97 CUP CUTTER PARTS 00006456 139418 CD849256 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
923.97
286247 716/2006 113422 RAKE PUBLISHING INC.
7/6/2006 8:07:42
Page - 24
Business Unit
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
200.00
MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 139585
8763
5822.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
50TH ST SELLING
200.00
MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 139585
8763
5842.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
YORK SELLING
200.00
MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 139585
8763
5862.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
VERNON SELLING
600.00
-
286248
7/6/2006
102631 REAMER, MARK
837.00
OFFICIATING FEES 139610
063006
4077.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
837.00
286249
716/2006
119755 RICCI, PATRICE
139.50
OFFICIATING FEES 139611
063006
4077.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
139.50
286250
716/2006
100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY
229.15
TOILET REPAIRS 00002030 139586
43175
5630.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
CENTENNIAL LAKES
229.15
286251
7/612006
101902 RINK SYSTEMS INC
670.10
RINK SUPPLIES 00008035 139288
9807841
5521.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ARENA ICE MAINT
670.10
286252
7/6/2006
100985 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQ CO INC
61.24
BUSHINGS 00001905 139523
C43283
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EOUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
61.24
286253
716/2006
101634 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPANY
46.78
BAKERY 00006349 139419
157533
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
46.78
286254
7/6/2006
101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT
210.17
ROUND TABLES 139587
062906
5420.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CLUB HOUSE
319.32
CAMERA 139587
062906
5424.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
RANGE
22.50
139613
063006
1624.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PLAYGROUND & THEATER
41.93
139613
063006
4075.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
VANVALKENBURG
593.92
286255
7/6/2006
105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO.
112.21
LUMBER 00001766 139289
40321119
1646.6577
LUMBER
BUILDING MAINTENP'
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # . Date
286256 716/2006
286257 716/2006
286258 716/2006
286259 7/6/2006
286260 7/612006
286261 71612006
286262 7/6/2006
CITY OF __,,4A
Council Check.Reglster
7/6/2006 --7/6/2006
Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
79.77 LUMBER 00001868 139420 40321908 5932:6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
25.30 LUMBER 00001891 139421 40323667 05453.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES
217.28
CONSULTING DESIGN
WM-451 Nine Mile Village
05451.1705.20
CONSULTING DESIGN
119799 SCHIMETZ, SCOTT
05451.1705.21
CONSULTING INSPECTION
279.00
OFFICIATING FEES
139612
063006
279.00
CONSULTING INSPECTION
STS -316 SUNNYSLOPE AREA CIPP
03413.1705.21
CONSULTING INSPECTION
104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP.
03428.1705.21
CONSULTING INSPECTION
399.27
QUARTERLY MAINTENANCE
139624
8101574989
399.27
CONSULTING INSPECTION
WM-459 59TH ST RAW WATER LINE
01332.1705.21
CONSULTING INSPECTION
101961 SCHMITZ, THOMAS
5913.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
36.47
CONFERENCE EXPENSE
139614
062606
197.00
CONFERENCE EXPENSE
139614
062606
233.47
100991 SCHWAB - VOLLHABER- LUBRATT
1,074.45
CONDENSING UNIT LEAK REPAIR
139293
060412 -002
1,074.45
119591 SCIPIONI, CHRISTINA
97.99
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
139746
070306
97.99
100995 SEH
1,448.79
NINE MILE - BID PREP
139456
0147027
451.29
NINE MILE BLVD - BID PREP
139457
0147028
4,680.99
NINE MILE BLVD - CONSTR
139458
0147030
21,624.15
NINE MILE - CONSTR
139459
0147029
515.41
CIPP INSPECTIONS
139460
0147033
1,000.00
CIPP INSPECTIONS
139460
0147033
1,000.00
CIPP INSPECTIONS
139460
0147033
396.06
59TH ST - BID PREP
139461
0147034
7,424.47
59TH ST - CONSTR
139462
0147031
5,062.98
CONSTR OBSERVATION
139463
0147032
43.00
CITYWORKS SOFTWARE
139464
0146817
43,647.14
119944 SELZLER, INA
149.00
SKATING CLASS REFUND
139524
062806
149.00
7/6_ 8:07:42
Page - 25
Business Unit
GENERAL STORM SEWER
Chemical Rm. Expanslon -plant 4
4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
1550.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1470.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL
2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS
05451.1705.20
CONSULTING DESIGN
WM-451 Nine Mile Village
05451.1705.20
CONSULTING DESIGN
WM-451 Nine Mile Village
05451.1705.21
CONSULTING INSPECTION
WM-451 Nine Mile Village
05451.1705.21
CONSULTING INSPECTION
WM-451 Nine Mile Village
04316.1705.21
CONSULTING INSPECTION
STS -316 SUNNYSLOPE AREA CIPP
03413.1705.21
CONSULTING INSPECTION
PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO SS
03428.1705.21
CONSULTING INSPECTION
SS-428 SUNNYSLOPE AREA CIPP
05459.1705.20
CONSULTING DESIGN
WM -459 59TH ST RAW WATER LINE
05459.1705.21
CONSULTING INSPECTION
WM-459 59TH ST RAW WATER LINE
01332.1705.21
CONSULTING INSPECTION
BA -332 S. LAKE CORNELIA NBHOOD
5913.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
DISTRIBUTION
5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
7/612006 8:07:42
Council Check Register
Page - 26
7/6/2006
--7/6/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
286263
716/2006
101587 SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES
2,535.00
DIAL -A -RIDE MAY 2006
139525
062806
1514.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
DIAL -A -RIDE PROGRAM
2,535.00
286264
7/6/2006
100997 SESAC INC.
155.00
MUSIC LICENSE DUES
00008059 139221
2525888
5510.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
ARENA ADMINISTRATION
155.00
286265
7/6/2006
102995 SHAPCO PRINTING INC.
511.20
NEWSLETTER
139588
143483 -01
2210.6575
PRINTING
COMMUNICATIONS
511.20
286266
7/6/2006
100998 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO.
6.80
PAINT THINNER
139422
4917-0
5422.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
44.51
PAINT
00006435 139423
4916 -2
5430.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
51.31
286267
7/6/2006
118211 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO.
8.34
PAINT
00006435 139424
5749 -7
5422.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
8.34
286268
7/6/2006
111824 SIDEKICK
717.01
PHOTO SCANNING
139465
2132
2210.6408
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
COMMUNICATIONS
717.01
286269
7/612006
100999 SIGNAL SYSTEMS INC.
82.27
TIME CARDS
00008057 139290
35639
5510.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
ARENA ADMINISTRATION
82.27
286270
7/6/2006
119949 SIGNS BY TOMORROW
241.70
BANNERS
00003620 139589
1709
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
241.70
286271
71612006
106415 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY
4,325.40
MULTI -SPORT EVENT
139526
324617725
1624.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PLAYGROUND & THEATER
4,325.40
286272
716/2006
116856 SPRINT
187.87
EVDO CONNECTION
139222
JUN1506
1400.6160
DATA PROCESSING
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
187.87
R55CKREG LOG20000
81.00
CITY OF _..ANA
286278
71612006
Council Check Register
101015 STREICHERS
7/6/2006
-7/6/2006
AMMO
Check #
Date .
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
286273
7/612006
1400.6203
101004 SPS COMPANIES
58.47
FLASHLIGHT, HOLSTER
00003024 139591
1360932
45.33
COUPLINGS, ADAPTORS 00001892
139425
S1468073.001
1551.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
45.33
286279
7/6/2006
101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
286274
716/2006
101016 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC
33.75
HANDLE
00001717 139528
444842CVW
10,068.43
NE EDINA TRANS STUDY
139466
5523 -8
1500.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
00001530 139.529
445826CVW
16,414.55
PRE DESIGN
139467
5656 -3
01313.1705.20
CONSULTING DESIGN
22,954.17
PRE DESIGN
139468
5211 -17
07091.1705.20
CONSULTING DESIGN
49,437.15
114.40
PUBLISH ORDINANCE
286275
716/2006
1120.6120
103283 ST. CROIX RECREATION CO INC
495.00
GRADUATION AD
1.39469
869424
201.29
VALVE ASSEMBLIES 00001750
139291
14892
1647.6530
REPAIR PARTS
105.44
CARTRIDGE & HOUSING 00001741
139590
14881
1642.6530
REPAIR PARTS
306.73
9.76
SEASON TICKET REFUND
286276
7/6/2006
5300.2039
119937 STEARNS COUNTY
150.24
SEASON TICKET REFUND
7/6,- - 8:07:42
Page- 27
- Business Unit
CITY HALL GENERAL
CONTINGENCIES
BA- 313 70TH & METRO
SIDEWALK INTERLACHEN /BLAKE
PATHS & HARD SURFACE
FIELD MAINTENANCE
30000 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 139223 062706 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
300.00
286277 7/612006 119942 STRAND, SHARON
8100 SKATING CLASS REFUND 139527 062806 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
ADMINISTRATION
COMMUNICATIONS
AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET
AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES
81.00
286278
71612006
101015 STREICHERS
1,610.38
AMMO
139224
1361053
1400.6551
AMMUNITION
127.75-
CREDIT
139225
CM212851
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
58.47
FLASHLIGHT, HOLSTER
00003024 139591
1360932
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1,541.10
286279
7/6/2006
101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
33.75
HANDLE
00001717 139528
444842CVW
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
82.70
HOSE ASSEMBLY
00001530 139.529
445826CVW
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
116.45
286280
716/2006
100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS
114.40
PUBLISH ORDINANCE
139292
869308
1120.6120
ADVERTISING LEGAL
495.00
GRADUATION AD
1.39469
869424
2210.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
609.40
286281
7/6/2006
119939 SWAN, KEVIN
9.76
SEASON TICKET REFUND
139294
062606
5300.2039
SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE
150.24
SEASON TICKET REFUND
139294
062606
5301.4532
SEASON TICKETS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
ADMINISTRATION
COMMUNICATIONS
AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET
AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
716/2006 -716/2006
Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO #, Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
160.00
286282 716/2006 100794 SWANSON, HAROLD
100.00 POLICE SERVICE 139178 070106 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
100.00
286283 7/6/2006 119864 SYSCO MINNESOTA
607.40
LINERS, TISSUE
139226
606241618
5311.6511
839.70
CONCESSION PRODUCT
139226
606241618
5320.5510
64.12-
CREDIT
139227
2518460PU
5320.5510
94.40-
CONCESSION PRODUCT
139228
2518488PU
5320.5510
466.82
CONCESSION PRODUCT
139592
606291749
5320.5510
5410.6406
1553.6585
5311.6180
5421.5514
5421.5514
5862.5515
5511.6406
1330.6530
`624.6406
CLEANING SUPPLIES
COST OF GOODS SOLD
COST OF GOODS SOLD
COST OF GOODS SOLD
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ACCESSORIES
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
GENERAL SUPPLIES
REPAIR PARTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
7/6/2006 8:07:42
Page - 28
RESERVE PROGRAM
POOL OPERATION
POOL CONCESSIONS
POOL CONCESSIONS
POOL CONCESSIONS
POOL CONCESSIONS
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
POOL OPERATION
GRILL
GRILL
VERNON SELLING
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
PLAYGROUND & THE"
1,755.40
286284
716/2006
101027 TARGET
147.69
E/D CARDS, BATTERIES
00006285
139426
061806
147.69
286285
716/2006
101326 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO
331.60
CONNECTORS, LIGHTS
00001527
139229
28421 -00
331.60
286286
716/2006
105123 THEMESCAPES, INC.
160.00
REPAIR ZIP LINER
139230
.206122 -1
160.00
286287
7/6/2006
101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING
COMPANY
538.50
139427
415119
347.00
139428
23020
139.20
139731
415130
1,024.70
286288
7/6 /2006
101826 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORP.
315.00
QUARTERLY MAINTENANCE
00008061
139231
407440
315.00
286289
7/6/2006
103982 TRAFFIC CONTROL CORPORATION
2,318.66
TRAFFIC LAMPS
00001818
139232
21440
2,318.66
286290
7/6/2006
101042 TRIARCO
225.50
TIE DYE KITS
139233
109581
5410.6406
1553.6585
5311.6180
5421.5514
5421.5514
5862.5515
5511.6406
1330.6530
`624.6406
CLEANING SUPPLIES
COST OF GOODS SOLD
COST OF GOODS SOLD
COST OF GOODS SOLD
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ACCESSORIES
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
GENERAL SUPPLIES
REPAIR PARTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
7/6/2006 8:07:42
Page - 28
RESERVE PROGRAM
POOL OPERATION
POOL CONCESSIONS
POOL CONCESSIONS
POOL CONCESSIONS
POOL CONCESSIONS
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
POOL OPERATION
GRILL
GRILL
VERNON SELLING
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
PLAYGROUND & THE"
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY 0. -NA
Council Check Register
7/6/2006 -7/6/2006
Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
129.79 PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES 139234 113862 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
7/6. . . 8:07:42
Page - 29
Business Unit
PLAYGROUND & THEATER
355.29
286291 71612006
116411 TRINITY MEDICAL SOLUTIONS INC.
2,103.96
UNIFORMS
00002206 139593
6620
5620.6201
LAUNDRY
EDINBOROUGH PARK
2,103.96
286292 7/6/2006
100682 TRUGREEN- CHEMLAWN
_
47.93
WEED CONTROL
139295
372953
1643.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
GENERAL TURF CARE
47.93
286293 716/2006
101045 TURF SUPPLY COMPANY
443.47
CAL - VANTAGE
00006450 139429
100778
5422.6545
CHEMICALS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
443.47
286294 716/2006
102489 TWIN CITY CONCRETE PRODUCTS CO
522.42
MORTAR
00001802 139430
292204
5932.6520
CONCRETE
GENERAL STORM SEWER
522.42
286.295 7/6/2006
101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE
284.99
DOOR CLOSERS
00002178 139594
178784
5620.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
245.86
DOOR PARTS /REPAIR
00001842 139595
178318
1646.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
530.85
286296 7/6/2006
102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO.
931.88
SEED
00006449 139431
14621
5422.6543
SOD & BLACK DIRT
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
153.36
FERTILIZER
00001843 139596
14627
1643.6547
SEED
GENERAL TURF CARE
1,085.24
286297 71612006
100363 U.S. BANK
27.37
POSTAGE
139597
062806
1550.6235
POSTAGE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
28.46
CONNECTOR
139597
062806
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
46.25
NAME BADGES
139597'
062806
1470.6558
DEPT UNIFORMS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
157.00
STAMPS
139597
062806
1550.6235
POSTAGE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
165.00
MFSCB CERTIFICATION
139597
062806
1470.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
255.49
MATTRESS PADS
139597
062806
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
269.50
GAS GRILL PARTS
139597
062806
1470.6530
REPAIR PARTS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
378.07
LOCKER
139597
062806
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
484.00
SUPPLIES FOR R -91
139597
062806
1480.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
SPECIAL OPERATIONS
568.22
SUPPLIES FOR R -91
139597
062806
1480.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
SPECIAL OPERATIONS
2,379.36
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
7/6/2006 8:07:42
Council Check Register
Page - 30
7/6/2006
-7/6/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
286298
7/612006
102026 UNISOURCE
1,917.00
ABOUT TOWN PAPER
00004112 139296
593 - 38710311
2210.6123
MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE
COMMUNICATIONS
1,917.00
286299
7/6/2006
101053 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY
131.10
BLACK BOXES, HOUSING
00001882 139432
599314
5921.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
LIFT STATION MAINT
131.10
286300
7/6/2006
100371 UNITED RENTALS
493.99
SPLINES, LUTES, TROWELS
00001864 139235
57081900 -001
1301.6556
TOOLS
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
493.99
286301
716/2006
100569 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
720.00
PESTICIDE TRAINING
00001837 139297
062806
1640.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL
720.00
286302
716/2006
101055 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
230.00
MMCAA CONFERENCE FEE
139470
062706
1120.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
ADMINISTRATION
230.00
286303
7/6/2006
114236 USA BLUE BOOK
453.11
METER COUPLINGS
00001888 139298
187319
5917.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
METER REPAIR
453.11
286304
71612006
101058 VAN PAPER CO.
347.39
BAGS
139236
640806
5822.6512
PAPER SUPPLIES
50TH ST SELLING
525.58
CAN LINERS
00001768 139299
640507
1645.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
LITTER REMOVAL
313.61
BAGS
00007512 139433
640807
5842.6512
PAPER SUPPLIES
YORK SELLING
4.85-
CREDIT
00006347 139434
640633
5421.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GRILL
471.80
ROLL TOWEL, TISSUE
00006347 139435
640508
5421.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GRILL
855.00
BAGS, TOWELS, UTENSILS
00007513 139598
640808
5861.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
VERNON OCCUPANCY
14.50
GLOVES
139599
641503
5862.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
VERNON SELLING
2,523.03
286305
7/6/2006
101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC.
445.00
LEASE CARS
00006293 139436
24318
5423.6216
LEASE LINES
GOLF CARS
1,498.72
ENGINE
00006458 139437
24380
5423.6530
REPAIR PARTS
GOLF CARS
64.75
STEERING HOUSING
00006457 139438
24369
5423.6530
REPAIR PARTS
GOLF CARS
2,008.47
286306
7/6 @006
102571 VGM CLUB
1,390.00
CART SEED CADDIES
00006438 139439
010099
5423.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GOLF CARS
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY Ot _,,NA
Council Check Register
7/6/2006
-7/6/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
—
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
1,390.00
286307
716/2006
101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER
345.06
PADLOCKS
00001823 139300
177124
1647.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
345.06
286308
7/6/2006
100023 VOGEL, ROBERT C.
1,000.00
HERITAGE PRES STUDY
139471
26026
07091.1705.20
CONSULTING DESIGN
1,000.00
286309
7/6/2006
101069 VOSS LIGHTING
793.89
LIGHTING
00001870 139301
15048046 -00
1646.6578
LAMPS & FIXTURES
793.89
286310
716/2006
101080 WALSH, WILLIAM
100.00
POLICE SERVICE
139177
070106
1419.6102
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
100.00 .
286311
716/2006
106085 WANDREI, LINDA
68.00
PROGRAM REFUND
139302
062706
1600.4390.03
FAB 4 & 5
68.00
286312
71612006
103266 WELSH COMPANIES LLC
554.93
JULY MAINTENANCE
139183
070106
5841.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
554.93
286313
7/6/2006
101076 WEST PHOTO
27.82
BACKDROP RENTAL
00004117 139600
60437
2210.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
27.82
286314
7/6/2006
114588 WILSON, ROBERT C. .
70.00
SUBSCRIPTION COST
139472
062806
1190.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
70.00
286315
7/6/2006
101033 WINE COMPANY, THE
7/6,_ 8:07:42 -
Page - 31
Business Unit
PATHS & HARD SURFACE
SIDEWALK INTERLACHEN /BLAKE
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
RESERVE PROGRAM
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
YORK OCCUPANCY
COMMUNICATIONS
ASSESSING
1,118.80 139732 144383 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
955.50 139733 144392 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
1 402 40 139734 144503 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
3,476.70
286316 7/6/2006 101312 WINE MERCHANTS
1,522.34 139366 160854 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/6/2006 8:07:42
Council Check Register Page - 32
Check # Date
286317 7/6/2006
286318 7/6/2006
286319 7/612006
286320 7/6/2006
286321 7/6/2006
286322 716/2006
286323 716/2006
101087 WROBLESKI, HENRY
100.00 POLICE SERVICE 139181 070106 1419.6102
100.00
105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC.
1,895.05 2006 MS4 /SWPPP 139473 1 - 6/14/06 5932.6103
8,949.50 W 70TH ST DESIGN 139474 3-6/22/06 01336.1705.20
10,844.55
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL STORM SEWER
CONSULTING DESIGN BA336 W70TH - FRANCE TO YORK
7/6/2006
--7/6/2006
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
727.21
139735
161437
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
2,149.78
139736
161515
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,780.95
139737
161514
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
512.15
139738
161513
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
8.25-
139739
29399
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
7.00-
139740 '
29400
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
12.00-
139741
29398
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
226.29-
139742
29584
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
6,438.89
112954 WISCONSIN TURF EQUIPMENT CORP.
219.27
AERATOR TINES
00006444 139440
526578- 000
5422.6530
REPAIR PARTS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
219.27
118395 WITMER ASSOCIATES INC.
146.99
HANGERS
00003608 139617
E238985
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
146.99
101082 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY
1,491.00
BALL PICKER PARTS
00006161 139441
140876
5424.6530
REPAIR PARTS
RANGE
241.29
MINI GOLF BALLS
00002018 139601
150762
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
1,732.29
118368 WOLFF, SARA
272.79
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
139303
062306
1644.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
TREES & MAINTENANCE
272.79
101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC
100.00
139367
180490
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
682.50
139743
180716
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
630.00
139744
180717
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
698.50
139745
180645
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
101087 WROBLESKI, HENRY
100.00 POLICE SERVICE 139181 070106 1419.6102
100.00
105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC.
1,895.05 2006 MS4 /SWPPP 139473 1 - 6/14/06 5932.6103
8,949.50 W 70TH ST DESIGN 139474 3-6/22/06 01336.1705.20
10,844.55
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL STORM SEWER
CONSULTING DESIGN BA336 W70TH - FRANCE TO YORK
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY
TWA
71, 3 8:07:42
Council Check Register
Page - 33
7/6/2006
-7/612006 _
Check # Date Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
- Business Unit
286325 716/2006
101726 XCEL ENERGY
1,273.58
51. 5107681-0
139237
73085706
5111.6185
LIGHT & POWER
ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT
944.07
51- 6223269 -1
139238
73112748
5210.6185
LIGHT & POWER
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
259.58
51- 4197645 -8
139239
73063463
1322.6185
LIGHT & POWER
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
57.21
51- 4420190 -3
139240
73233858
1321.6185
LIGHT & POWER
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
95.95
51- 4621797 -2
139241
73394683
1321.6185
LIGHT & POWER
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
30.45
51- 6892224 -5
139242
73452718
1330.6185
LIGHT & POWER
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
2,244.42
51- 5547446 -1
139243
73259468
1628.6185
LIGHT & POWER
SENIOR CITIZENS
2,775.64
51- 5005454 -3
139244
73249815
5913.6185
LIGHT & POWER
DISTRIBUTION
37.27
51- 6541084 -2
139245
73444346
1646.6185
LIGHT & POWER
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
57.95
51- 6692497 -0
139304
73602624
1460.6185
LIGHT & POWER
CIVILIAN DEFENSE
8,636.66
51- 6955679 -8
139305
73614491
1551.6185
LIGHT & POWER
CITY HALL GENERAL
2,357.70
51- 4159265 -8
139442
73400097
7411.6185
LIGHT & POWER
PSTF OCCUPANCY
2,984.26
51- 4827232 -6
139530
73734290
5311.6185
LIGHT & POWER
POOL OPERATION
576.71
51- 6137136 -8
139531
73754917
5430.6185
LIGHT & POWER
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
12,596.84
51- 6644819 -9
139532
73124935
5620.6185
LIGHT & POWER
EDINBOROUGH PARK
29,235.98
51- 4621797 -2
139533
73723071
1321.6185
LIGHT &POWER
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
102.97
51- 4197645 -8
139534
73386193
1322.6185
LIGHT & POWER
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
294.03
51- 5938955 -6
139602
73916237
4086.6185
LIGHT & POWER
AQUATIC WEEDS
181.50
51- 4156445-0
139603
73878622
5932.6185
LIGHT & POWER
GENERAL STORM SEWER
684.57
51- 6046826-0
139604
73914918
5422.6185
LIGHT & POWER
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
84.32
51- 5634814 -2
139605
73910873
5933.6185
LIGHT & POWER
PONDS & LAKES
133.54
51- 6229265 -9
139606
73919709
1481.6185
.LIGHT & POWER
YORK FIRE STATION
852.90
51- 6229265 -9
139606
73919709
1470.6185
LIGHT & POWER
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
66,498.10
600,702.56
Grand Total
Payment Instrument Totals
Check Total
600,702.56
Total Payments
600,702.56
R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/6/2006 8:09:35
Council Check Summary Page - 1 -
7/6/2006 - 7/6/2006
Company
Amount
01000 GENERAL FUND
176,896.21
02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND
9,926.30
04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND
15,778.23
04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND
45,431.70
05100 ART CENTER FUND
6,353.27
05200 GOLF DOME FUND
1,062.53
05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND
12,226.71
05400 GOLF COURSE FUND
41,381.06
05500 ICE ARENA FUND
10,809.62
05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND
17,880.66
05800 LIQUOR FUND
168,341.79
05900 UTILITY FUND
83,058.19
05930 STORM SEWER FUND
9,160.68
07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND
2,395.61
Report Totals 600,702.56
We confirm to the best of our ianowtec�a
and belief, thet these claims
comply in all materiel respects
with the requirements of the City
of Edina purchasing nolIkke and
Procedures date n lO
Finance Are r
City
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY 0 _ -iNA
7/l----j6 9:44:56
Council Check Register
Page - 1
7/13/2006
- 7/13/2006.
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
286326
7/13/2006
102971 ACE ICE COMPANY
14.28
139857
606587
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
49.40
139858
476020
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
128.52
139859
473584
5862.5515
COST OFGOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
137.64
139860
476133
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
53.40
140067
606618
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
62.12
140068
606617
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
35.56
140069
606589
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
480.92
286327
7113/2006
100615 ACME WINDOW CLEANING INC
1,054.35
RAMP CLEANING
139905
060133
1375.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PARKING RAMP
1,054.35
286328
7113/2006
100575 ALL SAFE INC.
34.96
EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE
139747
72663
5111.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT
473.75
EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE
139989
72881
1550.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
508.71
286329
711312006
119862 ALLIANCE MEDICAL
2,875.00
BUFFER ZONE GRANT
00003137 139906
587788
1400.4214
STATE GRANT
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
2,875.00
286330
7/1312006
100058 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #894
33,958.00
RECYCLING
139990
508280
5952.6183
RECYCLING CHARGES
RECYCLING
33,958.00
286331
7/13/2006
105086 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATI
127.50
WATER METER MANUALS
00001897 139748
1000317306
5916.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
METER READING
127.50
286332
711312006
102171 ANDERSON - JOHNSON
ASSOCIATES
8,500.00
FEASIBILITY STUDY
139749
060700606
47041.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
COURTNEY CONCESSION BUILDING
8,500.00
286333
7/13/2006
119976 AP LAWN
7,226.00
MULCHING & STREETSCAPES
00002027 139991
EDINA -0506
5630.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
7,226.00
286334
7/1312006
102646 AQUA LOGIC INC.
345.30
CHLORINE
00002198 139992
28941
5620.6545
CHEMICALS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
150.87
ACID
00002203 139993
28968
5620.6545
CHEMICALS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
R55CKREG LOG20000
41.45
MERCHANDISE
CITY OF EDINA
754082
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
Council Check Register
7/13/2006 - 7/13/2006
7/13/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier I Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
496.17
FOOD
00006324 139753
6450
5430.5510
286335
7113/2006
103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS
77.32
152.27
COFFEE 00006331
139750
402299 5430.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
100642 BANNERS TO GO
258.92
COFFEE
139994
402348 1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
63.90
411.19
00001933 139754
22133
1647.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
286336
7/1312006
101977 ARCH WIRELESS
SIGNAGE
00001847 139996
22147
1647.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10.97
PAGER
139751
P6096083G 1550.6188
TELEPHONE
10.97
286342
711312006
286337
7/1312006
119645 ARCSTONE INFORMATION SERVICES
178.75
EBROCHURE 00006321
139907
10992 5410.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
1470.4329
AMBULANCE FEES
178.75
58.00
286338
7/13/2006
119963 ARMSTRONG, MEGAN
286343
7113/2006
7/12/2006 9:44:56
Page - 2
Business Unit
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
25 00 JULY 4TH COSTUME CHARACTER 139995 070406 1624.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES PLAYGROUND & THEATER
25.00
286339 7/13/2006 102134 ASHWORTH INC.
41.45
MERCHANDISE
00006485 139752
754082
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
41.45
286340
7/13/2006
101954 AUGIE'S INC.
77.32
FOOD
00006324 139753
6450
5430.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
77.32
286341
7/13/2006
100642 BANNERS TO GO
63.90
PARK SIGNS
00001933 139754
22133
1647.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PATHS & HARD SURFACE
70.29
SIGNAGE
00001847 139996
22147
1647.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PATHS & HARD SURFACE
134.19
286342
711312006
119968 BARGER, MARK
58.00
AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT
139997
070606.
1470.4329
AMBULANCE FEES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
58.00
286343
7113/2006
119964 BATISTE, KANDIS
25.00
JULY 4TH COSTUME CHARACTER
139998
070406
1624.6013
SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES
PLAYGROUND & THEATER
25.00
286344
711312006
102195 BATTERIES PLUS
31.94
BATTERIES TECH KIT
139908
18- 151020
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GEr'- -'I.
7/1�- 9:44:56
Page - 3
Business Unit
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
280.54
139861
37566500
CITY OF. .A
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
R55CKREG LOG20000
157.10
139862
41721400
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
894.30
Council Check Register
139863
37566700
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
7/13/2006 7/13/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
140071
31.94
5862.5513
COST bF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
286345
7/13/2006
102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC.
286349 7/13/2006
13.02
TAX ON INVOICE C1054 00001528 139909
C1054TAX 1553.6530 .
REPAIR PARTS
13.02
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
139967
070706
286346
7/13/2006
ART CENTER REVENUES
100607 BAUER, MICHAEL
19.98
2006 UNIFORM PURCHASE 139910
070506 1301.6201
LAUNDRY
19.98
148.20
286347
7/1312006
070706
116151 BCA - BTS
ARTWORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
148.20
90.00
INTOX CLASS 139911
6066826,6066827 1400.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
286351 7/1312006
90.00
286348
7/1312006
311.58
101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION
139755
WO- 410628 -1
7/1�- 9:44:56
Page - 3
Business Unit
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
280.54
139861
37566500
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
157.10
139862
41721400
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
894.30
139863
37566700
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
137.63
140070
41729300
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
1,388.60
140071
37585000
5862.5513
COST bF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
2,858.17
286349 7/13/2006
100661 BENN, BRADLEY
230.41
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
139967
070706
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
230.41
286350 7/1312006
115067 BENSON, RON PAUL
148.20
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
139968
070706
5101.4413
ARTWORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
148.20
286351 7/1312006
100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS
311.58
FILE FOLDERS
139755
WO- 410628 -1
1551.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CITY HALL GENERAL
66.90
OFFICE SUPPLIES
139756
WO- 410328 -1
1495.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
INSPECTIONS
182.18
OFFICE SUPPLIES
139757
W0410642-1
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
185.61
OFFICE SUPPLIES
139912
WO- 410614 -1
1120.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ADMINISTRATION
93.11
HEADSET
139999
WO- 411157 -1
1550.6188
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
72.76
OFFICE SUPPLIES
140000
WO- 411056 -1
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
114.39
HEADSET'
140001
WO. 411248 -1
1550.6188
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
18.29
OFFICE SUPPLIES
140002
W0-411266 -1
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
2.65
OFFICE SUPPLIES
140003
WO- 410481 -2
1600.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
131.42
OFFICE SUPPLIES
140004
W0 -410481 -1
1600.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
103.02
ELECTRIC STAPLER
140005
OE- 61401 -1
1160.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FINANCE
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
7/13/2006
— 7/13/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
1,281.91
286352
711312006
119679 BIXBY PORTABLE TOILET SERVICE
110.98
SERVICE CHARGE
139913
4522
5430.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
221.95
SERVICE CHARGE
139914
4521
5422.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
588.25
SERVICE CHARGE
00001856 140006
4523
1646.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
921.18
286353
7/1312006
100654 SJORK STONE INC.
12,186.00
REPAIR STONE WALL
00005915 139758
0028
1344.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
180.00
REPAIR STONE WALL
00005915 139759
0029
1344.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
12,366.00
286354
7113/2006
103866 BLALOCK, KAREN
89.70
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
139969
070706
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
89.70
286355
711312006
102545 BLUE CROSS /BLUE SHIELD
45.59
AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT
140007
HARLAN
1470.4329
AMBULANCE FEES
APPLEOUIST
45.59
286356
711312006
101516 BRAEMAR PRINTING
184.84
GIFT CERTIFICATES
00006319 139760
00029948
5410.6575
PRINTING
184.84
286357
7113/2006
100664 BRAUN INTERTEC
7/12/2006 9:44:56
Page - 4
Business Unit
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
RETAINING WALL MAINTENANCE
RETAINING WALL MAINTENANCE
ART CENTER REVENUES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
2 195 15 CONCRETE TESTING 139915 263752 05427.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION PLANT #3 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYST
2,195.15
286358 711312006 103888 BRENT ANDERSON ASSOCIATES, INC
32,153.00 ROOF REPLACEMENT 00004103 139761 606040.01 5500.1720 BUILDINGS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET
32,153.00
286359 711312006 103995 BRYAN, LINDA NELSON
58.50 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 139970 070706 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES
58.50
286360 711312006 102083 CALHOUN ISLES COMMUNITY BAND
100.00 PERFORMANCE 7/16/06 140008 070106 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION
100.00
CITY OF -AA
7/1�._ _ , 9:44:56
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register.
Page - 5
7/13/2006
7/13/2006
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
J
Business Unit
286361 7113/2006
102149 CALLAWAY GOLF
3,511.61
MERCHANDISE
139762
908640286
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
65.00
MERCHANDISE
139763
909032602
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
72.00
MERCHANDISE
139764
908995410
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
74.17
MERCHANDISE
139765
908957361
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
246.96
MERCHANDISE
139766
908946199
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
105.58
MERCHANDISE
139767
908806705
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
102.96
MERCHANDISE
139768
908840743
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
198.96
MERCHANDISE
139769
908625496
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
246.96
MERCHANDISE
139770
908891124
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
407.25
MERCHANDISE
139771
908995409
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
779.15
MERCHANDISE
139772
908703779
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
753.84
MERCHANDISE
139773
908681787
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
1,193.76
MERCHANDISE
139774
909011707
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
509.39-
2005 YEAR END REBATE
139775
908200587
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
7,248.81
286362 7/13/2006
119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES
2,815.85
139864
101016
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
103.00
139916
110491
5430.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE.
932.30
140072
101022
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
33.90
140073
101023
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
2,688.25
140074
101024
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
76.05
140075
101025
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
6,649.35
286363 7/13/2006
119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO
402.45
139865
315741
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
402.45
286364 7/13/2006
119961 CHRISTENSON, MARY
80.67
REFUND CREDIT ON ACCT
140009
070606
5900.1211.1
ACCTS RECEIVABLE MANUAL
UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
80.67
286365 7/13/2006
105693 CITYSPRINT
9.37
COURIER
139776
1954
1140.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PLANNING
19.51
COURIER
139776
1954
1500.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CONTINGENCIES
147.92
COURIER
139776
1954
1554.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
176.80
286366 7/13/2006
101345 COLOURS
276.90
CONCEPT NAME - ART CENTER
140010
9580
2210.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
COMMUNICATIONS
CITY OF EDINA
7/12/2006 9:44:56
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 6
7/13/2006
--7/13/2006
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
224.00
AD DESIGN
140011
9578 -01
2210.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
COMMUNICATIONS
480.00
PROMENADE POSTCARD DESIGN
140012
9579
2210.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
COMMUNICATIONS
6,109.01
EDINA LIQUOR NEWSLETTER
140013
9561
2210.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
COMMUNICATIONS
685.00
POSTCARD DESIGN
140014
9561 -01
2210.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
COMMUNICATIONS
7,774.91
286367 7/13/2006
100693 COMMERCIAL FURNITURE
159.75
FILE CABINET
00001918 139917
15009 -0
1552.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
159.75
286368 7/13/2006
101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS
239.18
FILTER MASK, FILTERS
00001921 139777
02847086
1646.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
38.68
GLOVES
00001913 139778
02846770
1646.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
277.86
286369 7/13/2006
100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO.
69.00
KILN UPGRADE
00009183 139779
INV000021488
5112.6530
REPAIR PARTS
ART CENTER POTTERY
457.85
CLAY
00009183 139779
INV000021488
5120.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
526.85
286370 7113/2006
119839 CORNEJO CONSULTING
6,350.00
PLANNING CONSULTANT
139918
070106
1140.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PLANNING
6,350.00
286371 7/1312006
100513 COVERALL OF THE TWIN
CITIES IN
2.742.38
CUSTODIAL SERVICES
139780
108901
1551.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CITY HALL GENERAL
2,742.38
286372 7/13/2006
119969 CTN STUDIOS
1,410.00
TECHNICIAN TRUCK FOR PARADE
140015
070506
2210.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
COMMUNICATIONS
1,410.00
286373 7/13/2006
102121 DATREK PROFESSIONAL
BAGS INC
73.61
GOLF BAG
00006150 139781
925125
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
88.39
GOLF BAG
00006150 139782
925126
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
562.22
GOLF BAGS
00006150 139783
922442
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
724.22
286374 7113/2006
102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING
515.20
139866
367969
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
750.36
139867
368991
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
30.16
140076
368989
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
R55CKREG LOG20000
GOLF BALLS
00006316 139788
49454
CITY Ot
AA
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
384.00
Council Check Register
286382 7/13/2006
119966 DYRESON, BERNARD
7/13/2006 - 7/13/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
--
1,295.72
286383 711312006
100739 EAGLE WINE
286375
7113/2006
118490 DEEP ROCK WATER COMPANY
386.20
139868
434882
5822.5513
402.19
ACCT 6091800
139784
062706
5311.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
402.19
1,336.47
139870
434876
5862.5513
286376
711312006
100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY
51.01
BAKERY
139785
218934
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
59.19
BAKERY
139786
218981
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
119.24
BAKERY
139787
218982
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
49.38
BAKERY
139919
218983
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
278.82
286377
711312006
101947 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
1,260.00
MOTS - APR,MAY,JUNE
139920
P07MN027060M61-
1400.6160
DATA PROCESSING
660.00
CJDN - APR,MAY,JUNE
139921
P07MN02706006L
1400.6204
TELETYPE SERVICE
1,920.00
286378
7113/2006
111120 DESIGN N PRINT
79.81
INSPECTION REPORTS
140016
32342
1490.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
79.81
286379
7/13/2006
118556 DIAMOND, GARY
183.30
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
139971
070706
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
183.30
286380
711312006
108648 DOAN, SIIRI
113.10
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
139972
070706
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
113.10
286381
7/13/2006
114116 DUSHANE, DAVE
7/1L_- d 9.44.56
Page - 7
_ Business Unit
POOL OPERATION
GRILL
GRILL
GRILL
GRILL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
PUBLIC HEALTH
ART CENTER REVENUES
ART CENTER REVENUES
384.00
GOLF BALLS
00006316 139788
49454
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
384.00
286382 7/13/2006
119966 DYRESON, BERNARD
36.00
PARKING PERMIT REFUND
140017
070506
4090.4751
PARKING PERMITS
STREET REVOLVING
36.00
286383 711312006
100739 EAGLE WINE
386.20
139868
434882
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
1,535.24
139869
434886
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,336.47
139870
434876
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OFfDINA
Council Check Register
7/13/2006 — 7/13/2006
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
3,257.91
286384 711312006 100741 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
7/12/2006 9:44:56
Page - 8 —
133.95
139790
219583
5430.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
391.00
139791
18883
5421.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
GRILL
22,596.90
139871
320760
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER.
YORK SELLING
304.00
139872
674002
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
15.50
140077
674245
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
9,512.93
140078
320839
5842.5514
'COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
37.00
140079
320837
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
32,991.28
286385
7/1312006
103235 EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY BAND
100.00
PERFORMANCE 7/17106
140018
070106
5610.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
ED ADMINISTRATION
100.00
286386
7113/2006
103235 EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY BAND
150.00
PERFORMANCE 7/19106
140019
070206
5610.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER .
ED ADMINISTRATION
150.00
286387
7/13/2006
105875 EDINA EATERY INC./ PICKERMAN'
309.72
SONIA'S SNACKS
139792
1159
5111.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT
309.72
286388
7/13/2006
116448 EGAN OIL COMPANY
22,547.95
GAS 00005895
139789
125027
.1553.6581
GASOLINE
EOUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
22,547.95
286389
7/13/2006
105294 EKLUND MULCH SALES
734.85
PO 1305 & 1619 OOOMULCH140020
406
1644.6541
PLANTINGS & TREES
TREES & MAINTENANCE
734.85
286390
7/13/2006
105339 ENRGI
5,875.00
WEBSITE REDESIGN
139793
4522
2210.6124
WEB DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNICATIONS
5,875.00
286391
7113/2006
100752 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC.
2,607.12
CASTINGS, COVERS 00005926 139922
JJ3223
5932.6536
CASTINGS
GENERAL STORM SEWER
2,607.12
286392
711312006
104832 EVENT SOUND & LIGHTING
2,117.22
SOUND SYSTEM SERVICES 00007116 139923
743
1627.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SPECIAL ACTIVITIES
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY Ot —NA 7/1 ._ _..0 9:44:56
Council Check Register Page - 9
7/13/2006 7/13/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
- -- --
Subledger Account Description
-- - -- - - - --
- Business Unit
2,117.22
286393
7/13/2006
100018 EXPERT T BILLING
5,303.70
JUNE TRANSPORTS
140059
070606
1470.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
5,303.70
286394
7/1312006
104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC.
96.00
140080
439959
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
96.00
286395
7113/2006
100297 FAST FOTO & DIGITAL
17.25
PRINT FOLDERS
139794
T2- 227290
2210.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COMMUNICATIONS
17.25
286396
7/13/2006
119971 FELSEN, GREGG
68.25
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
139973
070706
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
68.25
286397
7113/2006
112870 FLEISCHMANN, LESLIE
82.55
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
139974
070706
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
82.55
286398
7/1312006
101475 FOOTJOY
102.90
SHOES
00006178 139795
4015753
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
102.90
286399
7113/2006
119972 GERSTNER, MARY KAY
113.75
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
139975
070706
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
113.75
286400
7113/2006
101867 GETSINGER, DONNA
85.80
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
139976
070706
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
85.80
286401
7113/2006
104119 GILBERTSON, BRIAN
150.00
PERFORMANCE 7/18/06
140021
070106
5610.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
ED ADMINISTRATION
150.00
286402
7/1312006
119936 GLOBAL OAK
1,200.00
WEBSITE MAINTENANCE
139796
326
2210.6124
WEB DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNICATIONS
1,200.00
11,868.34
CITY OF EDINA
7/12/2006 9:44:56
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 10
7/13/2006
7/13/2006
Check # Data
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No.
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
286403 711312006
118265 GLOVE IT
76.26
GOLF GLOVES
00006082 139797
8914
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
76.26
286404 7/13/2006
114697 GOPHER STRIPING CO.
350.00
RESTRIPE PARKING LOT
00001855 140022
06033
1647.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PATHS & HARD SURFACE
450.00
RESTRIPE PARKING LOT
00001852 140023
06032
1647.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PATHS & HARD SURFACE
350.00
STRIPE BUS PARKING AREAS
140024
06031
5311.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
POOL OPERATION
1,150.00
286405 7/13/2006
102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC
335.25
139873
83024
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
927.08
140081
83088
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
317.25
140082
83025
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,579.58
286406 7113/2006
101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE
88.58
INK CARTRIDGES
139798
070506
5840.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
30.00
CARDING INCENTIVE
140060
071006
5822.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
50TH ST SELLING
30.00
CARDING INCENTIVE
140060
071006
5842.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
YORK SELLING
30.00
CARDING INCENTIVE
140060
071006
5862.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
VERNON SELLING
30.42
PACKAGING TAPE
140060
071006
5840.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
209.00
286407 7/13/2006
102125 GREG LESSMAN SALES
351.43
MERCHANDISE
00006111 139924
33039
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
351.43
286408 7/13/2006
100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
1,132.03
139874
434883
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
579.30
139875
434651
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
2,625.58
139876
434885
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
266.19
139877
434884
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
264.45-
139878
696522
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
20.94-
139879
696867
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
51.28-
139880
696911
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
3,962.73
140083
433662
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
3,426.76
140084
434881
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
33.19
140085
434880
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
17923
140086
434879
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
11,868.34
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY 01 _ -ANA
711—_._.,6 9:44:56
Council Check Register
Page - 11
7/13/2006
— 7/13/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier I Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
286409
7/13/2006
119967 GROBE, RAY
830.00
AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT
140025
070606
1470.4329
AMBULANCE FEES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
830.00
286410
7/1312006
102869 GUEST, LISA
100.10
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
139977
070706
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
100.10
286411
7113/2006
101964 GUSTAVE A. LARSON CO.
-
18.73
CONTRACTOR
00001926 139925
BLM0097833
5840.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
18.73
286412
711312006
114566 HARTKE, BRENDA
79.95
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
139978
070706
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
79.95
286413
7/13/2006
100797 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT
3,036.86
CHEMICALS
00005913 139926
820116
5915.6586
WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES
WATER TREATMENT
3,036.86
-
286414
7/13/2006
101576 HEGGIES PIZZA
68.50
PIZZA
139927
149891
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
68.50
286415
7/13/2006
101921 HEGMAN, STEVE
150.00
PROGRAM ON 7/18/06
140026
070106
5610.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
ED ADMINISTRATION
150.00
286416
7/1312006
101209 HEIMARK FOODS
205.44
MEAT PATTIES
00006335 139799
019327
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
205.44
286417
7/13/2006
102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURI
476.06
FIELD MARKING PAINT
00005874 139800
72197
1642.6544
LINE MARKING POWDER
FIELD MAINTENANCE "
476.06
286418
711312006
104375 HOHENSTEINS INC.
331.00
140087
392793
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
331.00
286419
7/13/2006
100810 HRAICITY OF EDINA
10,000.00
TO FUND HRA
140117
071006
1000.1303
DUE FROM HRA
GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
7/13/2006 -- 7/1312006
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
1120.6107
1554.6406
1554.6406
1643.6530
1643.6530
5410.6406
5422.6406
5300.2039
5301.4541
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
7/1212006 9:44:56
Page - 12
- Business Unit
ADMINISTRATION
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
GENERAL TURF CARE
GENERAL TURF CARE
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
SALES 8 USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET
GENERAL ADMISSIONS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES
5820.6103
10,000.00
5840.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
5860.6103
286420 7113/2006
5310.6103
101426 HUGHES, GORDON
312.84
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
139801
070506
312.84
286421 7/13/2006
100698 IMAGE TECH SERVICES
243.34
TONER 00004121
139802
81491
62.88
PAPER 00004121
139929
81358
306.22
286422 7/13/2006
100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP.
46.89
HOSE, ADAPTORS, CLAMPS 00001835
139803
441381
65.35
HOSE, BUSHINGS, CUTTER 00001877
139804
441112
112.24
286423 7113/2006
112558 ISAAMAN, TREVOR
100.00
SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT
140027
070606
328.59
SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT
140027
070606
428.59
286424 7113/2006
119974 ISD #112 - CHASKA SHCOOLS
3.41
PARTIAL REFUND
140028
070706
52.59
PARTIAL REFUND
140028
070706
56.00
286425 7113/2006
101761 IVERSON, KATHRYN
3,981.16
CHEMICAL HEALTH PROGRAM
139930
070306
3,981.16
CHEMICAL HEALTH PROGRAM
139930
070306
3,981.16
CHEMICAL HEALTH PROGRAM
139930
070306
11,943.48
286426 7/13/2006
102157 JEFF ELLIS & ASSOCIATES INC.
550.00
SUMMER AUDIT #2
139931
20028780
550.00
286427 7113/2006
117354 JMS COMPANIES
496.46
HYDRANT USAGE REFUND
140061
071006
496.46
286428 7113/2006
100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.
539.06
139881
1100228
1120.6107
1554.6406
1554.6406
1643.6530
1643.6530
5410.6406
5422.6406
5300.2039
5301.4541
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
7/1212006 9:44:56
Page - 12
- Business Unit
ADMINISTRATION
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
GENERAL TURF CARE
GENERAL TURF CARE
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
SALES 8 USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET
GENERAL ADMISSIONS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES
5820.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
5840.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
5860.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
5310.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
5901.4626
5842.5512
SALE OF WATER
50TH STREET GENERAL
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
POOL ADMINISTRATION
UTILITY REVENUES
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
7/1�- 9:44:56
1,273.15
Council Check Register
070606
62.50
SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE
7/13/2006
98.08
070606
5301.4541
3,041.92
Inv No
Account No
1,275.54
_Business Unit
140088
12,320.03
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
5.15
140089
1102132
5.15
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
1,070.51
1102133
5862.5512
1,061.77
VERNON SELLING
140091
589.70
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
222.96
140092
1102121
94.36
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
21,659.88
1102122
286429 7/13/2006
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
103654 JOHNSON, DENISE
140094
67.60
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
67.60
140095
286430 7/13/2006
5842.5515
119965 KALIEBE, CAROL
YORK SELLING
8.24
PARTIAL REFUND
5842.5513
126.76
PARTIAL REFUND
140097
135.00
5842.5513
286431 7113/2006
YORK SELLING
103449 KAMPA, TINA
1102134
70.82
PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES
VERNON SELLING
70.82
1102127
286432 7/13/2006
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
106357 KIDS PLACE
140100
1.28
PARTIAL REFUND
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
19.72
PARTIAL REFUND
21.00
286433 7/13/2006
114344 KRAEMER, KARIN
186.55
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
186.55
286434 7113/2006
119975 KRON, MAGGIE
3.84
REFUND
59.16
REFUND
63.00
139979 070706 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES
140029 070506 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET
140029 070506 5301.4532 SEASON TICKETS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES
140030
CITY OF -_..qA
1624.6406
7/1�- 9:44:56
PLAYGROUND & THEATER
Council Check Register
070606
Page - 13
SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE
7/13/2006
7/13/2006
070606
5301.4541
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
_Business Unit
140088
1102131
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
140089
1102132
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
140090
1102133
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
140091
1102119
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
140092
1102121
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
140093
1102122
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
140094
1102123
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
140095
1098814
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
140096
1102125
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
140097
1102120
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
140098
1102134
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
140099
1102127
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
140100
1102128
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
139979 070706 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES
140029 070506 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET
140029 070506 5301.4532 SEASON TICKETS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES
140030
070606
1624.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PLAYGROUND & THEATER
140031
070606
5300.2039
SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE
AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET
140031
070606
5301.4541
GENERAL ADMISSIONS
AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES
139980
070706
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
140032
070706
5300.2039
SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE
AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET
140032
070706
5301.4541
GENERAL ADMISSIONS
AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
7/13/2006 — 7/13/2006
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description .
286435 7/13/2006 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
44.84 LMC DIRECTORY 140033 070106 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
44.84
286436 7/13/2006 100855 LESCO INC.
7/12/2006 9:44:56
Page - 14
Business Unit
ADMINISTRATION
120.53
CHEMICALS, SPRAYERS
00001839 139805
14301228
1643.6546
WEED SPRAY
GENERAL TURF CARE
120.53
286437
7113/2006
112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP
1,060.03
139882
203450
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
1,060.03
286438
7/13/2006
101741 M. SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS INC.
30.00
WINE SPECTATOR
139806
668894
5822.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
50TH ST SELLING
30.00
286439
7/13/2006
105677 MAGC
70.00
MEMBERSHIP & WORKSHOP
140034
070706
2210.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
COMMUNICATIONS
70.00
286440
7/13/2006
100868 MARK VII SALES
9,559.93
140101
968105
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
9,559.93
286441
7/13/2006
102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC
170.00
139932
30762
1550.6188
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
170.00
286442
7/13/2006
102153 MCAA
310.00
TRAINING
140035
070506
1400.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
310.00
286443
7/13/2006
100875 MCCAREN DESIGNS INC.
696.51
PLANTS
00002190 140036
36547
5620.6620
TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
696.51
286444
7/1312006
101457 MEICHSNER, EARL
98.79
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
140062
070706
1652.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
WEED MOWING
98.79
286445
7/13/2006
101483 MENARDS
60.80
CABLE/CLAMPS, PLIERS
00006312 139807
38714
5424.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
RANGE
CITY OF -,NA
7/1�,_ -..d - 9:44:56
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 15
7/13/2006 - 7/13/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
60.80
286446
7/13/2006
101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY
46.75
BASKETBALLS 139808
92542
1624.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PLAYGROUND & THEATER
46.75
286447
7/13/2006
100410 METROCALL.
11.23
PAGERS 139809
P0317425G
5860.6406
_GENERAL-SUPPLIES
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
11.23
PAGERS 139809
P0317425G
5111.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT
22.46
PAGERS 139809
P0317425G
1490.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PUBLIC HEALTH
22.46
PAGERS 139809
P0317425G
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
25.72
PAGERS 139809
P0317425G
5420.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CLUB HOUSE
93.10
286448
7/13/2006
102508 METZGER, MAURE ANN
116.35
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 139981
070706
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
116.35
286449
7113/2006
100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER &
1,440.00
GATE VALVE REPAIR 00001569 139810
32855
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
DISTRIBUTION
1,530.00
WATER SERVICE REPAIR 00001570 139811
32854
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
DISTRIBUTION
1,440.00
WATER SERVICE REPAIR 00001571 139933
32851
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
DISTRIBUTION
4,410.00
286450
7113/2006
101320 MINNEAPOLIS AREA ASSOC OF REAL
150.00
MLS ACCESS FEES 140037
1357297,1357298
1190.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
ASSESSING
150.00
286451
7/13/2006
103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT
27,869.64
WATER PURCHASE 140038
070506
5913.6601
WATER PURCHASED
DISTRIBUTION
27,869.64
286452
7/1312006
102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY
17.25
CARBON DIOXIDE 00006428 139934
R106060134
5421.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GRILL
17.25
286453
7/13/2006
102770 MINNESOTA CASTERS INC.
35.91
WHEELS 00001534 139935
INV27332
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
35.91
286454
7/13/2006
102014 MINNESOTA CLAY USA
25.50
POTTERY PLASTER 00009186 139812
43412
5110.6564
CRAFT SUPPLIES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/12/2006 9:44:56
Council Check Register Page - 16
7/13/2006 - 7/13/2006
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description - Business Unit
25.50
286455 7/1312006 101589 MINNESOTA GFOA
200.00 REGISTRATION - JOHN WALLIN 139936 070606 1160.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FINANCE
200.00 REGISTRATION - ERIC ROGGEMAN 139936 070606 1160.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FINANCE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS
ART WORK SOLD I ART CENTER REVENUES
GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES
ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION
SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS
TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS
ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES
GENERAL SUPPLIES SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE
COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT G' -4Y SHOP .
400.00
286456
7113/2006
103240 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL
280.00
DEFENSIVE DRIVING CLASS
140039
018793
1628.6103
280.00
286457
7/1312006
117418 MINNESOTA SNO FLAKES
93.60
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
139982
070706
5101.4413
93.60
286458
7/13/2006
100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC.
106.50
OVERSEEDER 00002032
140040
533199 -00
5630.6406
106.50
286459
7/1312006
103267 NATIONAL GOLF FOUNDATION
234.90
RULES BOOKS 00006322
139937
72775
5410.6122
234.90
286460
7/13/2006
100922 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS
1,451.23
SIGNS 00001701
139938
TI -0161212
1325.6531
1,451.23
286461
7113/2006
104672 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
264.07
140041
737969523 -025
1495.6188
264.07
286462
7113/2006
102260 NORMAN, MIKE
117.00
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
139983
070706
5101.4413
117.00
286463
7/1312006
101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPP
325.04
HOCKEY RINK PARTS 00001917
139813
111418
1648.6406
325.04
286464
711312006
100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY
33.55
CLEAR ACETATE 00009191
139814
33077700
5120.5510
114.69
TRIANGLES, T- SQUARES 00009176
139815
32963302 _
5120.5510
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS
ART WORK SOLD I ART CENTER REVENUES
GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES
ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION
SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS
TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS
ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES
GENERAL SUPPLIES SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE
COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT G' -4Y SHOP .
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY Ot
_ .,4A
7/1<._ .d 9:44:56
Council Check Register
Page - 17
7/13/2006
- 7/13/2006
Check #,
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
148.24
286465
7/1312006
100930 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO.
294.95
TIRES, SCRAP FEE 00001644 139939
NW- 102268
1553.6583
TIRES & TUBES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
294.95
286466
7/13/2006
116480 NSITE MYSTERY SHOPPING
163.93
SECRET SHOPPING
140042
1386
5862.6406
GENERAL-SUPPLIES
VERNON SELLING
165.00
SECRET SHOPPING
140042
1386
5822.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
50TH ST SELLING
165.00
SECRET SHOPPING
140042
1386
5842.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
YORK SELLING
493.93
286467
7/1312006
100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC.
261.87
FURNACE REPAIR 00006323 139940
95268
5210.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
261.87
286468
7113/2006
100347 PAUSTIS 8 SONS
1,119.85
140102
81135654N
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,119.85
286469
711312006
100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY
224.00
139816
93412101
5320.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
POOL CONCESSIONS
1,237.40
139941
36213161
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
200.00
140043
31173638
5630.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
CENTENNIAL LAKES
1,661.40
286470
7113/2006
100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
76.59
139883
2345422
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
333.90
140103
2346929
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
1,875.61
140104
2346927
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
1,198.75
140105
2346928
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
2,350.20
140106
2346930
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
5,835.05
286471
711312006
119146 PLYMAT, AMY
122.20
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
139984
070706
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
122.20
286472
7/13/2006
100961 POSTMASTER
_
375.00
NEWSLETTER
139942
070706
1628.6235
POSTAGE
SENIOR CITIZENS
375.00
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
7/12/2006 9:44:56
Council Check Register
Page - 18
7/13/2006
7113/2006
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
286473 7/13/2006
106152 POWERPLAN
922.26
FENDERS, SUPPORT, MIRROR
00001950 139943
P08237
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
922.26
286474 711312006
100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY
866.27
139884
434717
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
1,472.52
139885
434877
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
72.65
139886
434878
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
1,054.06
139887
434887
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
3,465.50
286475 7/13/2006
106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY
229.25
TISSUE, TOWELS
00002197 140044
3788
5620.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
229.25
286476 7/13/2006
100971 QUALITY WINE
920.15
139888
727900 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
309.75
13988%
727650 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
777.06
139890
727617 -00
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
1,521.24
139891
727602 -00
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
744.60
139892
727649 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
289.25
139893
727779 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
182.30
139894
727922 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
727.70
139895
727780 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,342.30
139896
727660 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
94.44-
139897
717820 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
240.00-
139898
720090 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
6.00-
139899
719240 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
1,016.06
140107
727539 -00
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
169.10
140108
729181 -00
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
7,659.07
286477 7/13/2006
101965 QWEST
54.82
952 929 -0297
139817
0297 -6/06
4090.6188
TELEPHONE
STREET REVOLVING
96.48
952 927 -8861
139818
8861 -0 /06 .
1550.6188
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
86.74
952 929 -9549
139819
9549 -6/06
5841.6188
TELEPHONE
YORK OCCUPANCY
55.07
140063
062806
5911.6188
TELEPHONE
PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER -
57.69
140063
062806
1628.6188
TELEPHONE
SENIOR CITIZENS
86.12
140063
062806
5861.6188
TELEPHONE
VERNON OCCUPANCY
99.59
140063
062806
5821.6188
TELEPHONE
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
100.93
140063
062866
5841.6188
TELEPHONE
YORK OCCUPANCY
v '
165.83
140063
062806
1622.6188
TELEPHONE
SKATING.& HOCKE'
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OP _ _.4A
Council Check Register
7/13/2006 - 7/13/2006
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
167.47
140063
062806
5610.6188
TELEPHONE
192.45
140063
062806
1470.6188
TELEPHONE
231.76
140063
062806
1646.6188
TELEPHONE
253.85
140063
062806
5511.6188
TELEPHONE
263.73
140063
062806
5932.6188
TELEPHONE
2,422.18
140063
062806
1550.6188
TELEPHONE
4,334.71
3,977.78
286478 7113/2006 119970 RAHN, HELEN
286482
7113/2006
7/1- . 9:44:56
Page - 19
Business Unit
ED ADMINISTRATION
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
GENERAL STORM SEWER
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
20.00 PROGRAM REFUND 140045 070606 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS
20.00
286479 7/13/2006 100287 RAMSEY COUNTY
200.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 139944 070606 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
5101.4413
5952.6406
1551.6406
2210.6105
4401.6710
1600.4722.03
5421.5510
ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
RECYCLING
CITY HALL GENERAL
DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS COMMUNICATIONS
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM.CTR
ARNESON ACRES RENTAL
COST OF GOODS SOLD
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
GRILL
200.00
286480
7/13/2006
119667 RAZIDLO, TERESA
84.50
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
139985
070706
84.50
286481
7/13/2006
102794 REHRIG PACIFIC COMPANY
3,977.78
RECYCLING BINS 00004109
139945
KE61923
3,977.78
286482
7113/2006
100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO.
73.92
SOFTENER SALT
140046
00179369
73.92
286483
7/13/2006
102614 ROTARY CLUB OF EDINA
263.00
DUES
139820
611
263.00
286484
7113/2006
118001 ROZEBOOM MILLER ARCHITECTS INC
6,247.80
ARCHITECT /ENGINEERING SERVICES
140047
15
6,247.80
286485
7113/2006
119962 SAHAR, MARY
150.00
RENTAL REFUND
140048
070506
150.00
286486
7113/2006
101634 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPANY
52.95
BAKERY
1139946
158213
5101.4413
5952.6406
1551.6406
2210.6105
4401.6710
1600.4722.03
5421.5510
ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
RECYCLING
CITY HALL GENERAL
DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS COMMUNICATIONS
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM.CTR
ARNESON ACRES RENTAL
COST OF GOODS SOLD
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
GRILL
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
7/13/2006 — 7/13/2006
Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART WORK SOLD
7/12/2006 9:44:56
Page - 20
Business Unit
GRILL
PLAYGROUND & THEATER
EDINBOROUGH PARK
CITY HALL GENERAL
CITY HALL GENERAL
ART CENTER REVENUES
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER INSPECTIONS
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL
CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL
CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER COMMUNICATIONS
52.95
286487
7113/2006
101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT
174.31
101- 25373069350
00006317
139947
GATORADE
5421.5510
174.31
286488
7/13/2006
119859 SANDELIN, CARRIE
114.72
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
140116
071006
1624.6107
114.72
286489
7/13/2006
118766 SARA LEE SOCK COMPANY
690.70
SOCKS FOR RESALE
00002136
140049
4332131
5620.5510
690.70
286490
7/13/2006
104689 SERIGRAPHICS SIGN SYSTEMS INC.
159.70
SIGNS
139948
37688
1551.6103
159.96
SIGNS
139949
37909
1551.6103
319.66
286491
7/13/2006
101380 SHAUGHNESY, SANDRA
78.00
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
139987
070706
5101.4413
78.00
286492
7/1312006
111824 SIDEKICK
1,549.58
PLAN INDEXING
139821
2128
1495.6136
1,549.58
286493
7/1312006
106663 SONARTEC INC.
278.95
GOLF CLUBS
00006081
139823
0056529 -IN
5440.5511
278.95
286494
7/13/2006
102935 SOUTH TOWN REFRIGERATION INC
158.93
FREEZER REPAIR
00006340
139950
53887
5421.6180
192.37
WALK IN COOLER REPAIR
00006340
139951
53827
5421.6180
1,592.29
REFRIGERATOR REPAIR
00006340
139952
54146
5421.6180
1,943.59
286495
7/1312006
101023 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN
CABLE COMMI
2,449.33
3RD QUARTER
139953
200612
2210.6136
2,449.33
286496
7113Y
110977 SOW, ADAMA
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART WORK SOLD
7/12/2006 9:44:56
Page - 20
Business Unit
GRILL
PLAYGROUND & THEATER
EDINBOROUGH PARK
CITY HALL GENERAL
CITY HALL GENERAL
ART CENTER REVENUES
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER INSPECTIONS
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL
CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL
CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER COMMUNICATIONS
CITY OF -_.,JA
7/12_ _ _0 9:44:56
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check.Register
Page - 21
7/13/2006
- 7/13/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
126.75
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
139988
070706
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
126.75
286497
7/1312006
116682 SPECIALTY WINES & BEVERAGES
201.00
140109
8919
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
201.00
286498
7/1312006
103283 ST. CROIX RECREATION CO INC
-
216.22
END CAPS 00001752
139822
14903
1647.6530
REPAIR PARTS
PATHS & HARD SURFACE
216.22
286499
7/13/2006
103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC
1,278.00
TIRES, RIMS 00001461
139954
SM09011
1553.6583
TIRES & TUBES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1,278.00
286500
7/13/2006
101007 STAR TRIBUNE
2.712.80
WANT ADS
139955
063006
1550.6121
ADVERTISING PERSONNEL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
2,712.80
286501
7/13/2006
119978 STATE SUPPLY COMPANY
322.64
HARDWARE
140064
264257
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
197.03
HARDWARE
140065
267706
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
367.43-
HARDWARE RETURNED
140066
285890
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
152.24
286502
7113/2006
101015 STREICHERS
318.44
AEROSOL
139957
1362739
1400.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
417.96
AVON ROUND
139958
1362696
1400.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
736.40
286503
7/13/2006
117992 STRINGER BUSINESS SYSTEMS
37.73
COPIER MAINT
139959
1180016
1400.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
37.73
286504
7/13/2006
102639 .STROHMYER,TOM
150.00
PERFORMANCE 7/20/06
140050
070106
5610.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
ED ADMINISTRATION
150.00
286505
7/1312006
102140 SUN MOUNTAIN SPORTS INC.
57.00
MERCHANDISE
139824
660199
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
657.20
MERCHANDISE
139825
661249
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
127.50-
CREDIT
139826
867275
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
7/12/2006 9:44:56
Council Check Register
Page - 22
7/13/2006
7113/2006
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
_ Business Unit
255.00-
CREDIT
139827
866924
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
10.00-
CREDIT
139828
866683
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
83.00-
CREDIT
139829
867276
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
127.50-
CREDIT
00006099 139956
867780
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
111.20
286506 7/13/2006
100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS
550.00
JULY 4TH AD
139830
871674
2210.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
COMMUNICATIONS
550.00
286507 7/13/2006
119864 SYSCO MINNESOTA
539.64
CONCESSION PRODUCT
139831
607011767
5320.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
POOL CONCESSIONS
193.42
CONCESSION PRODUCT
139832
607049050
5320.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
POOL CONCESSIONS
641.90
CONCESSION PRODUCT
139833
607041041
5320.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
POOL CONCESSIONS
38.71
CONCESSION PRODUCT
139834
607050595
5320.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
POOL CONCESSIONS
143.65
CLEANING SUPPLIES
139960
607061503
5311.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
POOL OPERATION
521.23
CONCESSION PRODUCT
139960
607061503
5320.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
POOL CONCESSIONS
2,078.55
286508 711312006
111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC.
35.00
BEERLINE CLEANING
00006325 139835
365390
5421.6102
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
GRILL
35.00
286509 7113/2006
113549 TENNIS WEST
12,540.00
TENNIS COURT RESURFACING
00001307 139961
06 -466
1647.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PATHS & HARD SURFACE
210.00
TENNIS COURT STRIPING
00001307 140051
06467
1647.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PATHS & HARD SURFACE
12,750.00
286510 7/1312006
101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING
COMPANY
412.85
139836
415787
5421.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
GRILL
412.85
286511 7113/2006
103366 TIME WARNER CABLE
659.33
CABLE TV ADVERTISING
139837
212781
5822.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
50TH ST SELLING
659.33
CABLE TV ADVERTISING
139837
212781
5842.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
YORK SELLING
659.34
CABLE TV ADVERTISING
139837
212781
5862.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
VERNON SELLING
1,978.00
286512 7/1312006
101474 TITLEIST
118.63
MERCHANDISE
139838
0495298
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
2,415.88
MERCHANDISE
139839
0476396
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES.
2,534.51
t
y
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY Oh
A
Council Check Register
7/13/2006
-- 7/13/2006
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
286513
7/13/2006
118704 TOWNSHEND, SCHUYLER
26.17
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
140052
070706
2210.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
26.17
286514
711312006
103982 TRAFFIC CONTROL CORPORATION
1,575.42
LIGHTS
00001883 139962
21504
1330.6215
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
1,575.42
286515
711312006
118190 TURFWERKS LLC
274.42
HYDRAULIC CYLINDER, HOSE
139963
T110296
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
274.42
286516
7/1312006
119977 U.S. TOY CO/CONSTRUCTIVE PLAYT
78.50
PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES
140054
8128105001
1624.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
78.50
286517
7/13/2006
119973 UDVIG, JOSH
157.50
CABLE PRODUCTION SERVICES
140053
070706
2210.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
157.50
286518
711312006
114236 USA BLUE BOOK
92.17
VALVES, NIPPLES
00001939 139964
191581
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
92.17
286519
7/13/2006
100050 USPS - HASLER
4,000.00
ACCT# 75983
139840
070606
1550.6235
POSTAGE
4,000.00
286520
7/1312006
101058 VAN PAPER CO.
284.58
BAGS
00007512 139841
641952
5842.6512
PAPER SUPPLIES
14.50
GLOVES
139842
641778
5862.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
85.73
TOWELS, CUPS
00009193 139843
641173
5111.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
523.18
CAN LINERS
00001846 140055
642507
1645.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
907.99
286521
7/13/2006
104394 VANCE, LINDSEY
96.44
COSTUME CHARACTER, PLAYGROUND 140056
070406
1624.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
96.44
286522
7/13/2006
102004 VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER
COM
7/1 9:44:56
Page - 23
Business Unit
COMMUNICATIONS
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
PLAYGROUND & THEATER
COMMUNICATIONS
DISTRIBUTION
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT
LITTER REMOVAL
PLAYGROUND & THEATER
280.24 SPRINKLER INSPECTION 140057 110127 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK
R55CKREG LOG20000
101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC
CITY OF EDINA
3,258.00
140111
180841
Council Check Register
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
2,565.00
140112
180920
7/13/2006
- 7/13/2006
YORK SELLING
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier ! Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
--
Subledger Account Description
- - -- --
280.24
286528 711312006
101726 XCEL ENERGY
286523
7113/2006
103466 WASTE MANAGEMENT - SAVAGE
MN
22.58
51- 7567037 -0
139847
74276836
1321.6185
4,025.54
REFUSE
139844
3641115
4095.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
5914.6185
LIGHT & POWER
1,261.65
REFUSE - ART FAIR
139845
3653696
4095.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
LIGHT & POWER
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
3,104.23
REFUSE
139846
3653695
4095.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
DISTRIBUTION
916.50
8,391.42
139851
74253474
5821.6185
LIGHT & POWER
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
286524
7/1312006
139851
118998 WATKINS, BONNIE
5861.6185
LIGHT & POWER
VERNON OCCUPANCY
1,533.50
51- 6979948 -4
139851
110.50
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
139986
070706
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
139852
74223963
110.50
LIGHT & POWER
DISTRIBUTION
5,214.11
51 -0966303 -6
139853
286525
7/13/2006
LIGHT & POWER
101033 WINE COMPANY, THE
4,027.95
51- 6840050 -6
139854
74104935
5911.6185
LIGHT & POWER
356.80
18,188.80
139900
144802 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
LIGHT & POWER
ARENA BLDG /GROU'
436.80
139901
144804 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
48480
139902
144803 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
1,278.40
286526 7113/2006 101312 WINE MERCHANTS
905.27 139903 161438 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
411.44 139904 161627 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
631.46 140110 162053 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
7/12/2006 9:44:56
Page - 24
Business Unit
50TH STREET RUBBISH
50TH STREET RUBBISH
50TH STREET RUBBISH
ART CENTER REVENUES
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
VERNON SELLING
286527 7/13/2006
101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC
3,258.00
140111
180841
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
2,565.00
140112
180920
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
100.00-
140113
180686
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
5,723.00
286528 711312006
101726 XCEL ENERGY
22.58
51- 7567037 -0
139847
74276836
1321.6185
LIGHT & POWER
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
1,196.56
51- 5847121 -5
139848
74251067
5914.6185
LIGHT & POWER
TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR
19.53
51- 4151897 -6
139849
74250634
1646.6185
LIGHT & POWER
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
3,501.52
51- 6621207 -1
139850
74245099
5913.6185
LIGHT & POWER
DISTRIBUTION
916.50
51- 6979948 -4
139851
74253474
5821.6185
LIGHT & POWER
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
1,356.86
51- 6979948-4
139851
74253474
5861.6185
LIGHT & POWER
VERNON OCCUPANCY
1,533.50
51- 6979948 -4
139851
74253474
5841.6185
LIGHT & POWER
YORK OCCUPANCY
35,337.58
51- 5605640 -1
139852
74223963
5913.6185
LIGHT & POWER
DISTRIBUTION
5,214.11
51 -0966303 -6
139853
73966126
1330.6185
LIGHT & POWER
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
4,027.95
51- 6840050 -6
139854
74104935
5911.6185
LIGHT & POWER
PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER
18,188.80
51- 4888627 -1
140114
74540632
5511.6185
LIGHT & POWER
ARENA BLDG /GROU'
7/12/2006 9:44:56
Page - 25
Business Unit
CLUB HOUSE
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
SENIOR CITIZENS
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
.Council Check Register
7/13/2006
— 7/13/2006
Check # Date Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger
Account Description
6,837.61
51- 6824328 -7
140115
74744630
5420.6185
LIGHT 8 POWER
78,153.10
286529 711312008,
100568 XEROX CORPORATION
101.19
JUNE USAGE
139855
018150764
5110.6151
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
532.55
JUNE USAGE - ADMIN
00004060 139965
018150555
1550.6151
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
325.57
JUNE USAGE - PARK & REC
00004322 139966
018150557
1550.6151
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
56.08
APR - MAY -JUNE USAGE
00007191 140058
018150778
1628.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1,015.39
286530 7113/2006
101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
285.49
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
00006320 139856
54161981
5430.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
285.49
517,351.19
Grand Total
Payment Instrument Totals
Check Total
517,351.19
Total Payments
517,351.19
7/12/2006 9:44:56
Page - 25
Business Unit
CLUB HOUSE
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
SENIOR CITIZENS
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/12/2006 9:46:13
Council Check Summary Page - 1 —
7/13/2006 7/13/2006
Company
Amount
01000 GENERAL FUND
116,048.46
02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND
19,793.16
04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND
23,230.04
05100 ART CENTER FUND
3,700.08
05200 GOLF DOME FUND
261.87
05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND
3,879.74
05400 GOLF COURSE FUND
25,707.01
05500 ICE ARENA FUND
50,595.65
05600 EDINBOROUGH/CENT LAKES FUND
11,045.08
05800 LIQUOR FUND
139,856.34
05900 UTILITY FUND
82,427.13
05930 STORM SEWER FUND
2,870.85
05950 RECYCLING FUND
37,935.78
Report Totals 517,351.19
We confirm to the best of our Icnowbfte
and belief, that these claims
comply in all material respects
with the requirements of the City
of Edina purchasing Holes and
procedures d
PLEASE NOTE:
THE ATTACHED
CORRESPONDENCE
HAS BEEN DUPLEXED
Page 1 of 1
Darlene Wallin
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 10:44 AM
To: Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com
Cc: Darlene Wallin
Subject: FW: PROPOSED NATURE CENTER @ BREDESEN PARK
Jennifer Bennerotte
Communications & Marketing Director
City of Edina
952 - 833 -9520
FAX 952 - 826 -0390
ibennerotte@ci.edina.mn.us
From: JJuintah @aol.com [mailto:JJuintah @aol.com]
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 9:12 AM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: PROPOSED NATURE CENTER @ BREDESEN PARK
I would like to register my opposition to the proposed Nature Center at Bredesen Park. One plus million
could be spent in away that would benefit all residents and be much less disruptive. IT SIMPLY IS NOT A
NECESSARY OR DESIRABLE EXPENDITURE.
Jacqueline Andrews
5232 Duncraig Rd.
7/10/2006
Page 1 of 1
Darlene Wallin
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 10:42 AM
To: John Keprios; Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @wilIis.com
Cc: Darlene Wallin
Subjer,t: FW: Bredesen Park
Jennifer Bennerotte
Communications & Marketing Director
City of Edina
952 - 833 -9520
FAX 952 - 826 -0390
jennerotte @ci.edina.mn.us
From: barbara drew [mailto:barbarajdrew @yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 10:41 AM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
— Subject: Bredesen Park
Edina Park Dept and City Council:
Bredesen Park is a special place of solitude away from the buildings and traffic of the city. I especially
appreciate its long expanses of green folliage. It is a quiet, peaceful place to walk or jog. Please do not
destroy it by adding buildings to it! It seems that anywhere there is green, one can expect it will soon be
developed. I have been so thankful this beautiful place has been preserved as a park, so it can't be
developed and now someone has proposed it be developed. Please, NO! ! There are many places to meet
and hold receptions and even have picnics, but there are few that are in their natural, undeveloped state.
This park does not need to be studied. It needs to be simply enjoyed. Please leave it alone!
Barbara Drew
Sneak preview the all -new Yahoo.com. It's not radically different. Just radically better.
7/10/2006
Page 1 of 1
Darlene Wallin
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 10:35 AM
To: Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com
Cc: Darlene Wallin; John Keprios
Subjedt: FW: Bredesen Park
Jennifer Bennerotte
Communications & Marketing Director
City of Edina
952 - 833 -9520
FAX 952 - 826 -0390
jennerotte @ci.edina.mn.us
From: Robert Tolles [mailto:rtolles @yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 10:12 AM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: Bredesen Park
Dear Sirs,
I am writing against the concept of buliding this new "educational nature center" in Bredesen Park with
the attendant outbuildings.
Bredesen is the ONLY park in Edina with some degree of wildness to it. The Barred Owl lives there.
There is a fox den. It is where I saw my first Great Gray Owl hunting mice. The "inner circle" of
Bredesen is a wonderful refuge and should be kept intact. The school children of Edina should continue
to use the wonderful educational centers in Richfield or Saint Louis Park. It strikes me as quite wasteful
for Edina to spend such money just so Edina can have "its own" nature center.
So, put me down as opposing spending money for a "consultant" to draw up plans to make Bredesen just
like every other park ...
Bob Tolles
7143 Valley View Rd.
Edina, MN 55439
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC -to -Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢ /min or
less.
7/6/2006
Darlene Wallin
nom:
Jennifer Bennerotte
Monday, July 17, 2006 3:45 PM
,ent:
To:
Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com
Cc:
Darlene Wallin
Subject:
FW: mayor hoviand
Jennifer Bennerotte
Communications & Marketing Director
City of Edina
952- 833 -9520
FAX 952 - 826 -0390
jbennerotte@ci.edina.mn.us
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Tim Creagan [mailto:tcreagan @mn.rr.com]
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2066 3:37 PM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: to: mayor hovland
07 -17 -06
dear mayor hovland:
my name is tim creagan and I'm a part of group, friends of edina nature center, who is
trying to have a nature center built here in our city.
his e-mail is just to serve and an update on what we, as a group, are doing.
we had a general meeting at my home (6704 point drive) on 07- 10 -06. we discussed the
feedback (both positive and negative) that has come out after our presentation to you and
the city council on 06- 06 -06. we feel that our immediate needs are to check on the status
of the needs assessment survey and to continue to spread the word in a clear and concise
manner as to the intended nature of this project. so, we will pull elements of our power
point and our business plan and tun them into conversation points. this way the
philosophy of the nature center may be better conveyed to those who are in favor of it and
oppose it.
one idea of a structure, that was not made very clear in the power point presentation, was
that of a zero emissions structure. to the knowledge of those at the meeting, the only
such structure in the area is at the science museum in st. paul. this maybe another way
to promote the edina nature center. not only as a place to learn about nature. but, a
place to learn about ways to live in such a way that we reduce the need for electric and
gas energies.
our next meeting will be on monday, august 7th and i will let you know how things are
progressing at that time.
if you have any ideas, advice, suggestions etc. please feel free to pass them along to me
and i will share them with the group. we are a very eager group. however, in many ways
we are still learning as we go through this very exciting process.
my best,
tim creagan
6704 point drive
edina, mn 55435
952.922.8622 (home)
1
To Whom It May Concern:
Darlene Wallin
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 8:35 AM
To: Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com
Cc: Darlene Wallin; John Keprios
Subject: FW: Mom's Letter
Jennifer Bennerotte
Communications & Marketing Director
City of Edina
952 - 833 -9520
FAX 952 - 826 -0390
jennerotte @ci.edina.mn.us
From: Jim Williams [ mailto :jim- williams33 @mn.rr.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2006 3:42 PM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: Mom's Letter
To Whom It May Concern:
I have been a resident of Edina since June of 1967.
There was an article in the Edina Sun about building a Nature Center at Bredesen Park.
In my opinion, I don't think it would enhance this area. It is a beautiful park where
people enjoy a quiet walk or run through a very unique wooded area. The nature center
would change all this.
I have enjoyed walking Bredesen Park for 27 years and hope it can be preserved for
others to enjoy.
Sincerely,
Bonnie Williams
5809 Arbour Ave.
Edina MN
7/17/2006
Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1
Darlene Wallin
From: - Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 11:31 AM
To: Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com
Cc: Darlene Wallin
Subject: FW: bredeson park
Jennifer Bennerotte
Communications & Marketing Director
City of Edina
952 - 833 -9520
FAX 952 -826 -0390
jennerotte@ci.edina.mn.us
From: ROBERT A REED [mailto:bokareed @msn.com]
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 11:08 AM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: bredeson park
City Council:
I am concerned with your proposed plan to change Bredesen Park to a "nature" park to be used
by weddings and birthday parties.
We are fortunate in Edina to have many such venues, i.e., Arneson, Braemar, Centennial, and
Edinborough.
All of these can be used for the parties in question.
We currently have a wonderful true nature trail or trails at Bredesen. I and many others use the
park every day. How many of you can say the same.
Have you truly thought through the additional space needed for parking, and the nine -mile creek
which runs through the park for which you would have to give up additional space for the water-
shed.
If you have extra money to spend, lets fix the streets and infrastructure, the park is great just
the way it is.
Thank you
Karen Reed
7/17/2006
Page 1 of 1
Wayne Houle
From: Roger Glanzer
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 3:58 PM
To: Wayne Houle
Subject: FW: Public Works
Hi Wayne,
Mark Jungwirth helped the person from the message below.
Roger.
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 3:17 PM
To: Roger Glanzer
Subject: FW: Public Works
Jennifer Bennerotte
Communications & Marketing Director
City of Edina
952 - 833 -9520
FAX 952 - 826 -0390
jennerotte @ci.edina.mn.us
From: Jim Castle [mailto :james.castle @earthlink.net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 12:40 PM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: Public Works
Public Works Dept.
To whom it may concern:
Last night I had a water leak at the main water valve in my home. I would like to thank the individual who at
midnight took the call and was able to help me stop the leak from running through the night. It was a big relief that
I could call the city at such a late hour to solve a water problem.
Sincerely,
Jim Castle
Jim Castle
7300 Wooddale Ave.
Edina, MN 55435
(952) 920 -9277 Home
(612) 269 -1719 Cell
iames.castle0earthlink.net
7/12/2006
-ro v2u edm2 61n"/"5 -
� had cbn
llla�;(- at1�/2 �t✓"!
/04
Un�FfCl � �Ltornk dOXda �°"' � r�c�'
p / /�p�, /�°oGahad� @aliwcw
/4.tEC � Az //r�d.6�iu�t � lxia�ro db
/f2f�l� �Earrni
�fl Y1i( kospifaPso�u�� Mind
�rr"a"9h�su�hyu�zte�ce.
{��vrPac+� aX-Y�ce /77aovxl�N� -
A Million aid - tee tkav%O
— 75kA&*uA o
DAO S SAME - IeI M� l� &v
Received From Paul Bearmon via e-mail July 14, 2006
I am not for taking choices away. I •believe there need to be choices and reasonable ones.
This is why Annie Glavin approached Park and Recreation in the first place. It is
arbitrary that certain volunteer groups automatically receive access and others are told no.
At the Park and Recreation meeting involving Annie Glavin the basketball board
threatened to resign if Annie was given access. The folks involved made the point that if
Annie received access other families might chose the option she was offering and this was
not acceptable to them.
There are other ways associations limit choices. There isn't much of a choice if a child has
to commit to a given sport at an early age — to year round play — to costly programs - or
suffer exclusion from higher -level participation later. It isn't a choice for a child or family
if the only programs offered involve either excessive or minimal participation options.
I do not want to limit the choice of Travel. For anyone not familiar with the concept,
Travel is a more intense experience for the kids and involves more time and money and
often involves some sort of tryout system. Different associations start the travel portion of
their programs at different ages. My thinking is that at young ages any child, who wants
to participate in "travel" = however that is defined, ought to have the opportunity to do so.
What purpose is served by preventing young children who want to be active at more
involved levels from participating? Excluding young children answers an adult need, not a
child's. There is no research that supports defining kid's long -term athleticism before the
onset of puberty.. And this is what happens because the early selection process sets up who
will subsequently be playing travel and who drops out even though they had ability. The
end result would be better teams at the high school level because more kids with ability and
willing to work hard would stay involved. The idea that this would hold back the "truly
gifted" is not supported by the research.
As Bob Bigelow put it in his Book "Just let the Kids Play" - in watching a group of 40 6th
grade boys basketball players he might have been able to find 4 or 5 that weren't as bad as
the remainder —he could then have watched the remaining boys for three days and not told
much difference between them. Bigelow was an NBA scout as well as player.
The argument that there are not enough resources to support what I have just advocated is
disingenuous. Of course there are not enough resources if you design your programs to
give inordinate amounts of those resources to a very small number of kids. And if you
wrongly believe that it is important to separate out kids before they have gone through
puberty you will argue against such an approach.
I'm reminded of a passage from an article on cutting kids from Cleveland's Hall of Fame
sports writer Hal Lebovitz. I quote:
"Doyt Perry, who, until his retirement, was one of the state's most successful
coaches, in high school and later at Bowling Green State University, never cut a boy.
I didn't care if 100 came out, and we got almost that many," he said. "If they want
the football experience, they should have it. At Ohio State, Woody Hayes never sent
a boy away, no matter how green or how puny."
Do we really know more about this than Doyt Perry or Woody Hayes — and this was
for participants at the college level!
Received From Paul Bearmon via e -mail July 14, 2006
To go on to specific issues about our associations and the Task Force....
First - Many associations do a good job — but of course not all and not always. Their
boards can change rapidly, or slowly. This might last for years at a time. So what
happens when the association is not doing things that in the best interest of our children?
The associations argue they are independent entities and the "government' or City has no
business in looking at how they run their programs. At the last Task Force meeting the
suggestion of "legal repercussions" was made if the city pursued any attempt to provide
oversight. But associations are utilizing Public facilities, which are accessed at markedly
reduced fees - with the breaks on the fees totaling tens of thousands of dollars. Because
we are talking about public fields and facilities — the City has an obligation to ensure they
are used in a manner consistent with an established set of criteria. And again, because
these are public facilities being used to provide services to children the City has the
.responsibility to ensure children are treated in a. manner consistent with their development
and age.
Parents come into the area of youth sports with little knowledge. There is a learning
curve and many of the issues being brought up are discussed, argued and at times
worked out. However, parents soon leave the area and there is no continuity. It is as
though we start over again and again with the same concerns. There is no mechanism. in
place to bring improvements forward and keep them in place. A Youth Sport Council
would provide such a mechanism.
Perhaps there was not a clear understanding of what the Task Force was suppose to
address. However, many issues were.left on the table which were brought to their attention
through the many emails received outlining community concerns about our youth.sport
environment, and through a well attended open Public hearing.
The central concern of associations receiving tens of thousands of dollars of public
access - but without community oversight was not'addressed or explored. Neither was
the issue of both house and travel programs being under the same association, which in
some cases has large amounts of money being transferred from the house to the travel
area and creates conflicts of interest in accessing resources.
The issue of children being judged early and therefore having their athletic experiences
"set' was not addressed. As stated, before puberty athletic talent is not predictable, yet
this is when most associations do the selecting which has long term implications. This is
irrational and prejudicial and similar to earlier policies of keeping woman away from sport
facilities.
Not addressed or questioned is the sometimes - disproportionate allocation of public
resources given to children at ages as young as 9 or 10 based on these "judgments."
The costs and time required of young children who might be interested in a travel program
were not addressed. Nor the increasing requirement for year rounds play in orders to
stay competitive. The drop out rate of 75% of children from youth sports by age 12 -13 was
Received From Paul Bearmon via e-mail July 14, 2006
not addressed - nor the health or social implications of kids leaving sports early - From
diabetes an obesity to becoming at risk teens.
The entire issue of the various associations suggesting "no oversight of any sort was
acceptable" was overlooked. In the May 3rd meeting legal action in response to a
request for compliance with minimal standards was brought up as a threat — and needed a
stern reply. Public, not private facilities are being accessed.
The important issue of why a group that might offer a different approach than a given
association (e.g. Annie Glavin's girls) not be given fair access if their program made good
sense was not addressed.
Finally, the grievance process as designed was a far cry from a group where a parent
could voice a concern about a global issue (anonymously if necessary). It is a process
no parent would likely ever utilize — as stated by one of the Task Force and Park Board
members "why would we want to make it easy for parents to voice a concern."
And as stated by the public many times — there is a lot of risk in a parent voicing concerns
about a program. Even board members have been reprimanded for voicing concerns to
the board.
One of the arguments presented was that if a parent wanted to see change in an
association they should join a board. From multiple perspectives this is problematic,
time constraints being the most obvious, the difficulty of facing an entrenched old guard
another.
As I already said much of what we do serves adult needs, not the child's.
People interested in accessing much of the material sent to the Task Force and Council
can find it at the KEAP website - www.keap.net
A productive next step would be a working group put together by the City Council to
devise an effective approach to these issues. A Sports Council modeled after the School
Board concept is one idea and a good one. Surrounding communities and cities across
the country are already exploring various options to get a handle on the youth sport
environment. Edina need not be left behind.
Park and Recreation departments throughout the country, including ours, have stated
they are not interested in overseeing youth sport activity. Therefore this needs to be done
independently of Park and Recreation.
Edina has a unique opportunity to be a leader in the area of youth sports. I am confident
Edina can create a situation that is a win win — for our kids, for our sports scene, for our
associations and for our children's well being. It would also be a big win for the city of
Edina itself. Edina's reputation as a leader in looking out for its' children would only
benefit.
Page 1 of 2'
Darlene Wallin
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 1:37 PM
To: Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; sGot.housh @willis.com
Cc: Darlene Wallin
Subject: FW: Cascade Lane support for completing the HW100 soundwall
Jennifer Bennerotte
Communications & Marketing Director
City of Edina
952- 833 -9520
FAX 952 - 826 -0390
jennerotte@ci.edina.mn.us
From: bobfiedler @aol.com [mailto:bobfiedler @ aol.com]
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 9:14 AM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Cc: dknoer @riderlaw.com; gigiknoer @mn.rr.com
Subject: Cascade Lane support for completing the HW100 soundwall
Honorable Mayor and Council Members,
We wish to add our support and appreciation for the efforts to complete the HW100 soundwall on
the west side south to the 50th Street exit.
The addition of the soundwall to the Cascade Lane area has provided significant improvement for
direct road noise reduction and the elimination of visual distraction of the movement on the
highway. However, we have experienced a significant increase in the creek side noise coming from
south of the bridge down Minnihaha Creek due to the discontunance of wall going south.
We were disturbed that a minority of residents on the SW quadrant opposed the wall after
previously understanding that the wall was widely supported by the neighbors involved and we
were led to believe that no additional support was needed.
Your efforts and concurrance to reactivate the completion of the soundwall project will be greatly
appreciated.
If additional hearings or meetings concerning the completion of the soundwall are scheduled, we
would like to be notified so that we can participate and support the efforts.
Thank you for your ongoing support and service.
Best regards,
Bob and Carol Fiedler
7/7/2006
Page 2 of 2
4604 Cascade Lane
952 - 926 -9864 home
612 - 810 -0612 cell
Check out AOL.com today. Breaking news, video search, pictures, email and IM. All on demand.
Always Free.
7/7/2006
Page 1 of 1-
Darlene Wallin
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 6:58 AM
To: Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com
Cc: Darlene Wallin
Subject: FW: sound wall petition from minnehaha creek to 50th on highway 100
From: Leedharn @aol.com [mailto:Leedharn @aol.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 4:50 PM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Cc: gigiknoer @mn.rr.com
Subject: sound wall petition from minnehaha creek to 50th on highway 100
Dear Ms.Bennerotte,
We are sending tihs email in support of the subject petition. We hope the city will approve the petition so the
wall can be completed. This would benefit our property to reduce the noise level from the area south of the
bridge.
Could you Please forward copies to The Mayor and the Council Members
Thank you,
Beverly and Lee Harness
4609 Cascade Ln
Edina
7/14/2006
Page 1 of 1
Darlene Wallin
From: Bettyhemstad @aol.com
Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2006 8:40 AM
To: all.kieffer @att.net; Diana Hedges; Brad Benn; jkeprois @ci.edina.mn.us; caroline269 @netzero.com;
WFGreer @aol.com; KathWeth @tcq.net; dcrockett @mn.rr.com; imasica @ci.edina.mn.us;
kbcrealtor @yahoo.com; Gordon Hughes; Jim Hovland; Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: Grandview Park
Hello All,
We are back in Edina for a couple of days from our "other home" on the Gunflint Trail. At the top of my to -do list
was to stop over at Grandview Park. ,
What a perfectly wonderful experience it was! It is indeed a peaceful oasis set in the middle of a lot of activity.
After five seconds I didn't notice the cars buzzing around the circle or the planes roaring overhead. First, I was
transported to the forest and could almost hear the raven's raspy call. Then it was back to my childhood when it
was OK to jump into a huge pile of leaves with an imagination to see a leaf chair waiting to catch me. Finally, the
Nordic Serpent had me looking over the deck of a steamer in a Norwegian Fjord imagining this exquisite
"monster" slithering in the cool, crystal clear, brilliant blue water. What a trip! What a glorious experience!
Now the purpose of this note is to say THANK YOU to all of.you who made this experience happen right here in
Edina. Public Art is important. Public Art is possible because some made the difficult decisions to set the Public
Art wheels turning. It is also possible because there were volunteers who agonized over the Who, What, When
and Where over the last couple of years. My thanks go out to each and every one of you.
My hope is- that the people of Edina know that the sculpture garden exists s. We shouldn't look back... but... wouldn't
it have been a great opportunity to have had the Nordic Serpent on the cover of About Town? In one day
everyone in our City would have been talking about Grandview Park. It would have been a perfect lead -in to the
article "Your City, Your Art."
Again, my sincere thanks,
Betty Hemstad
7/10/2006
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD
TUESDAY, JUNE 13, 2006, AT 7:00 P.M.
EDINA CITY HALL — MAYOR'S CONFERENCE ROOM
4801 WEST 50TH STREET
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Bob Kojetin, Marie Thorpe, Chris Rofidal, Lou
Blemaster, Laura Benson, Nancy Scherer, and Ian Yue
MEMBERS ABSENT: Karen Ferrara, and Arlene Forrest
STAFF PRESENT: Joyce Repya, Associate Planner
OTHERS PRESENT: Robert Vogel, Heritage Preservation Consultant
I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES:
Member Thorpe moved for approval of the minutes from the April 11, 2006 meeting.
Member Yue seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried.
II. DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE HERITAGE PRESERVATION PLAN:
Consultant Vogel presented the Board with a completed draft copy of the
Comprehensive Heritage Preservation Plan for their review. The major elements of
the plan include the Introduction, Mission, Vision, Objectives with related Issues and
Actions, Historic Contexts and an Inventory of historic properties. He pointed out that
a brief history of preservation in the city could be added to the Introduction and a map
identifying the designated and eligible landmarks could be added to the Inventory.
Mr. Vogel reminded the Board that they have reviewed the individual elements of the
plan as they were created and now that the plan is complete, if the Board agrees to
adopt the plan, it will be handed over to the planners who are working on the City's
overall Comprehensive Plan. Vogel noted that the HPB will not present the Heritage
Preservation Plan to the City Council at this time because the plan actually makes up
one of the chapters in the City's overall Comprehensive Plan which is in the process
of being updated.
The Board asked for clarification regarding some items within the plan as they
discussed the following eleven objectives:
Objective #1: Prepare. and adopt a heritage preservation plan.
Minutes — June 13, 2006
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
Objective #2: Identify significant heritage resources worthy of consideration in
community planning.
Objective #3: Evaluate heritage resources to determine whether they meet defined
criteria of historical, architectural, archaeological, or cultural significance.
Objective #4: Rezone significant heritage resources as Edina Heritage Landmarks or
Landmark Districts.
Objective #5: Protect heritage landmarks through design review.
Objective #6: Carry out public facilities maintenance and construction projects in
such a manner that significant heritage resources are not destroyed or damaged.
Objective #7: Encourage voluntary compliance with historic preservation treatment
standards.
Objective #8: Preserve significant heritage resources on city property.
Objective #9: Provide public education in heritage preservation.
Objective #10 Participate in the federal -state -local government heritage preservation
partnership.
Objective #11 Be prepared to respond to disasters involving heritage resources.
Consultant Vogel pointed out that the Heritage Preservation Plan provides a blue print
for the entire city. Because it encompasses the entire city, it is somewhat general in
nature. One will find more specifics in the individual plan of treatment adopted for
each of the designated properties.
General discussion ensued among the Board about the adoption of the plan.
Member Thorpe asked if the history of preservation to be added to the Introduction
and the map of designated properties for the Inventory needed to be completed prior
to adopting the plan. Consultant Vogel stated that the Board could approve the plan
subject to staff signing off on the history of preservation and designation map. Board
members agreed that rather than continuing the discussion of the plan to the July
meeting, it would be a good idea to move on the plan and allow staff to approve the
final details.
Member Thorpe then moved to adopt the Comprehensive Heritage Preservation Plan
subject to staff's approval of the history of preservation and the landmark inventory
map. Member Rofidal seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried.
7
Minutes — June 13, 2006
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
III. SOUTHDALE'S 50T" ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION:
Chairman Kojetin explained that he and Planner Repya attended a meeting at the
Edina Historical Society with Rachel Macht, a marketing representative from
Southdale regarding the upcoming 50th Anniversary celebration for the mall. At this
time, Southdale is starting to formulate their plans and are open to suggestions and
assistance from both the Historical Society and the Heritage Preservation Board.
Currently, they are anticipating kicking off a 50 day celebration on the 1St of October to
culminate with a gala to coincide with the holiday shopping season.
Kojetin added that he has been in contact with Marty Ruud who was instrumental in
the opening festivities for the mall in 1956. Mr. Ruud is retired, still living in Edina and
would probably be thrilled to be a part of the anniversary celebration.
Planner Repya stated that she suggested Ms. Macht contact some of the planners of
the high school reunions that will be occurring this summer to gain insight into the
Southdale memories the Edina grads hold dear.
Consultant Vogel pointed out that Southdale Mall has been identified as one of the
Tier II Historic Contexts in the Historic Context Study. Within the study, the goal of
identifying and recording historically important art objects and fixtures associated with
the mall, as well as exploring preservation alternatives to identifying the mall as an
historic preservation site were recognized as priorities. Vogel added that the 50th
anniversary would be an ideal time to target those planning goals.
Board members agreed that they would be pleased to participate in the celebration.
Chairman Kojetin promised to keep the Board advised of the progress. No formal
action was taken.
IV. OTHER BUSINESS:
A. 6001 Pine Grove Road — Maryhill
Planner Repya explained that Maryhill, the home at 6001 Pine Grove Road was built
by Dr. Paul and Mrs. Mary Carson in 1941, and designed by renowned architect
William Gray Purcell. Dr. Carson recently passed away and the home will be going
on the market this summer. As a means of introducing the home to the public, tours
were offered over three dates in June. The Board received notice of the tours;
apparently, none of the members made it to the open house.
Responding to questions regarding whether the property was eligible for landmark
designation, Ms. Repya explained that at least ten years ago, the HPB pursued
landmark designation of the property, however Dr. and Mrs. Carson chose to list their
3
Minutes — June 13, 2006
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
property with the Minnesota Land Trust rather than applying the local historic
designation. Board members thanked Ms. Repya for the information. No formal
action was taken.
B. Paul Peterson House Tour — 5312 Interlachen Boulevard
Consultant Vogel explained that as part of his Interlachen Trail research he has
identified most of the historic properties abutting the proposed trail on the north side
of Interlachen. The Paul Peterson house is one of the historic homes, and because
there are so many new members on the Heritage Preservation Board, a tour of this
landmark designated home would be a good opportunity to provide insight into the
characteristics of a landmark property. Planner Repya offered to contact Paul and
Nancy Winter to schedule a time when the Board could meet at their home and
discuss its historic significance. She indicated that depending on the Winter's
schedule, she would attempt to schedule the tour prior to the July or August meetings.
No formal action was taken.
C. Interlachen Country Club — 6200 Interlachen Boulevard
Consultant Vogel advised the Board that he attended a meeting with the Manager of
the Interlachen Country Club to gain information for the survey of the historic
properties abutting the proposed Interlachen Trail. He observed that the club house
has been renovated so many times that it would no longer qualify for landmark
designation. However, the golf course remains relatively unchanged from the original
course designed by Donald Ross in 1911.
Discussion ensued regarding the significance of the course. Mr. Vogel indicated that
it is possible that the golf course could be eligible for National Register designation
and /or Edina Landmark designation due to the age of the course-and the fact that
Donald Ross was such a famous golf course designer. Furthermore, Vogel pointed
out that the members of club appreciate the history of the original course and may
look favorably upon a landmark designation. No formal action was taken.
D. 2006 State Historic Preservation Conference — Sept. 28 & 29 in Red Wing
Chairman Kojetin announced that the State Historic Preservation Conference will be
held on Thursday and Friday, September 28 and 29 in Red Wing, Minnesota.
Because Edina is a Certified Local Government, we are required to send at least one
Board member to at least one day of the conference. Kojetin pointed out that in the
past, members have attended that Friday sessions and found them very beneficial.
Planner Repya explained that the City will pay the registration of Board members
wishing to attend and promised to keep the Board advised once the registration
opens up.
Minutes — June 13, 2006
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
E. Goals for Future Designations
Chairman Kojetin asked Consultant Vogel about the timeline for future landmark
designations. Vogel explained that under the terms of his contract, two designations
per year are doable. The process takes about four months per designation and it is
best to take on one designation at a time.
Kojetin asked Mr. Vogel to provide the Board with information regarding the cost per
designation - pointing out that in the event the Board would choose to undertake four
designations per year, he would like to know what the additional cost would be. Mr.
Vogel agreed that he would provide that information.
F. Street Name Change — W. 56th Street to Surrey Lane
Member Rofidal updated the Board on the progress he and his committee have made
relative to preparing the petition for the street name change. He met with the Building
Coordinator, Steve Kirchman to report that a survey was mailed to 40 neighbors; a
total of 25 Yes responses have been received; 8 No responses; 5 responses not
returned; and 2 need more information. Mr. Kirchman indicated that the response
data indicated 30% favorable rating. He suggested that the committee work on the 5
households that did not return their survey to see if they were in favor, thus increasing
the current 30% favorable rating. Mr. Kirchman also indicated that it would be helpful
if the committee received an endorsement from the Historical Society and the
Heritage Preservation Board.
Addressing the question about the concerns of the households that voted No,
Member Rofidal stated that some people wondered if their mortgage or deed would
have to be changed — the answer is no; others were concerned about the disruption
with the post office. However, he discovered that the post office will deliver to both
street addresses for a 1 year period of time.
Member Scherer observed that because West 56th Street runs intermittently from
France Avenue on the east side of Edina to Hansen Road on the west side, it can be
very confusing when trying to find an address if one is not familiar with the house
numbering system.
A brief discussion ensued among the Board. Member Blemaster then moved that the
Heritage Preservation Board provide Mr. Rofidal and his committee with a resolution
supporting the name change of their street from West 56th Street to Surrey Lane in
keeping with the developer's original plan to provide English names for the streets in
the neighborhood. Member Scherer seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion
carried.
5
Minutes — June 13, 2006
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
V. NEXT MEETING DATE: -July 11th to be rescheduled
Chairman Kojetin announced that the next regularly scheduled meeting on July 11 th
falls on the evening of the Annual Braemar Inspection Tour. He asked that the
meeting be rescheduled to the next evening, Wednesday, July 12th at 7:00 p.m.
Board members agreed that change of date to July 12th would work for them. No
formal action was taken.
VI. ADJOURNMENT: 9:00 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Jayc&Repyw
9
Page 1 of 1
Darlene Wallin
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 8:32 AM
To: Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com
Cc: Darlene Wallin
Subject: FW: To the Mayor of Edina
Jennifer Bennerotte
Communications & Marketing Director
City of Edina
952 - 833 -9520
FAX 952 - 826 -0390
jennerotte@ci.edina.mn.us
..From: Robert Calgren [mailto:rcalgren @mn.rr.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 6:57 PM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: To the Mayor of Edina
Dear Mayor:
After all the derogatory television and newspaper coverage of Southdale this past week, I think it's imperative that
the. City of Edina get actively involved in insuring this valuable property no longer continues to be mismanaged.
Year after year it becomes less appealing to shop there. A trip out to Eden Prairie Center shows anyone with a
sense of marketing and management how incompetently Southdale has been managed. Anyone with a memory
of how Southdale looked 20 years ago also knows how incompetently it has been managed. Selling the property
is not an excuse.
Hoping something can be done,
Robert Calgren
4713 Virginia Lane
Edina
7/12/2006
John Keprios, Director
Edina Park & Recreation Department
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Office (952) 826 -0430
FAX (952) 826 -0385
Jkeprios @ci.edina.mn.us
Memo
To:
Mayor and ci Members.
From:
John Kep os
CC:
Gordon Hu
Date:
July 14, 2006
Re: Needs Assessment Survey Interviews.
The Park Board's needs assessment survey consultant, Ron Vine from ETC Institute(lAsure
Vision, would like to interview each Council Member as part of the needs assessment survey
process. Mr. Vine is suggesting that he interview one and no more than two Council
Members at a time.
Attached is a schedule of interview times set up for Thursday, August 3, 2006. I ask that the
Mayor and Council please choose their preferred times to meet with our consultant. Thank
you!
Also attached is a draft copy of the publicity piece to inform the community of how they can
be involved in the process.
Needs Assessment Survey
Interview Schedule
(all meetings are at Edina City Hall)
Wednesday, August 2, 2006
Noon to 1:15 p.m. Park and Recreation Department Staff; Community Room
4:00 p.m. to 5:15 p.m. Park Board Ad -Hoc Committee; Mayor's Conference Room
5:30 p.m. to 6:45 p.m. General Focus Group; Council Chambers
7:00 p.m. to 8:15 p.m. Environment and Conservation Focus Group; Council Chambers
Thursday, August 3, 2006
7:30 a.m. to 8:00 a.m. City Council Member; Mayor's Conference Room
8:00 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. City Council Member; Mayor's Conference Room
8:30 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. City Council Member; Mayor's Conference Room
9:00 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. City Council Member; Mayor's Conference Room
9:30 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. City Council Member; Mayor's Conference Room
Noon to 1:15 p.m. Athletics Focus Group; Council Chambers
PARK AND RECREATION NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEY
YOUR INPUT IS REQUESTED
The Edina Park and Recreation Department and Edina Park Board has hired the
consulting firm of ETC Institute/Leisure Vision to conduct a Needs Assessment Survey
to learn how the community feels about current and proposed park and recreation
facilities and services. This will be a random survey mailed to over 500 households
throughout Edina in September of 2006.
To ensure that the survey addresses the issues of most importance to the community, it is
important to get your input into the survey process. Therefore, the Edina Park and
Recreation Department is asking for your input which you can provide in a number of
ways of your choice.
You may submit your suggestions in the form of questions that you feel that should be
asked in the survey by sending them by postal mail to:
Needs Assessment Survey
Attention: John Keprios, Director
Edina Park and Recreation Department
4801 West 50`h Street
Edina, MN 55424
O
Email your suggestions /questions to EdinaMail(d�ci.edina.mn.us; or visit the City of
Edina's website at www.cityofedina.com and click on EMAIL.
The Edina Park and Recreation Department is also conducting three separate Focus
Groups as another venue to share your proposed suggestions/questions. The Focus
Groups are set up into three different categories:
General Focus QLouR
The General Focus Group will be held on Wednesday, August 2, 2006, from 5:30 p.m. to
6:45 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Edina City Hall. This focus group is intended to
address suggestions for general park facilities and services; such as, current and proposed
facilities and services in your neighborhood and community parks, and enterprise
facilities and services, such as, Braemar Golf Course, Edinborough Park, Edina Aquatic
Center, etc.
Environment and Conservation Focus Groun
The Environment and Conservation Focus Group will be held on Wednesday, August 2,
2006, from 7:00 p.m. to 8:15 p.m. in Council Chambers, Edina City Hall. This focus
group is intended to address issues that deal with natural resource management,
conservation, citizen proposal to develop a nature center in Bredesen Park, and other
issues of importance that deal with our natural resources; such as, forestry and water
quality.
Athletics Focus Group
The Athletics Focus Group will be held on Thursday, August 3, 2006, from 12:00 noon to
1:15 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Edina City Hall. This focus group is intended to
address issues that deal with youth and adult athletic programs and facilities, including
your ideas for facility improvements or additions.
If you have any questions about the process, feel free to contact the Director of the Edina
Park and Recreation Department John Keprios at (952) 826 -0430.
gobe -i Co&l
5609 Heather Lane
Edina MN 55436 -1205
Home: Voice and Fax (952) 922 -3091
Office: Voice (952) 484 -7210 Fax (952) 448 -9427
June 15, 2006
DICK CROCKETT, Executive Director
EDINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATON
5280 GRANDVIEW SQUARE
EDINA, MN 55436
RE: Fire Incident #06 -907
Dick:
In appreciation for the outstanding job done by Tom Jensen and his crew on Saturday March 18,
2006, I would like the enclosed contribution applied toward the Edina Fire Department's
purchase of a Thermal Infra Imaging Camera
The Infra Camera used that night was the "sole" reason my house was not extensively damaged by
the fire crew in determining the source and extent of the fire. There was no visible flame. There
was only smoke pouring through.the roof, out the back of the chimney into the garage and out of
the downstairs fireplace. The camera was able to isolate the fire's nucleus. It was on the main
floor between the wall above the fireplace mantle and below the ceiling face plate. It had not
spread across the ceiling's crawl space from one end of the house to the other as indicated by the
smoke pouring through the roof.
The insurance company's adjuster related a story of a fire with the same characteristics in a
house of same design as mine. In both situations, the smoke indicated the fire had spread into the
ceiling crawl space and across to the other end of the house. In that situation, the house's roof,
many ceilings, floors and walls had to be repaired and/or replaced because they were opened or
sustained collateral damage in the search to locate the actual fire. It was months before the
residents were able to resume living in their home. I, on the other hand, was out for 30 days and
most of those days were occupied getting the estimates from the sub - contractors and the
insurance adjusters' agreement on the total estimate for all the repairs. Needless to say, the
camera's intrinsic value in saved mental and emotional stress, family displacement expenses and
the cost to repair my home back to it's to pre -fire condition is far greater than its market value.
Tom and the crew members are also to be commended for the care and thoughtfidness in the
manner with which they moved the wall hanging, the furniture and the nick knacks without
incurring breakage or other damage. The attention to getting the water off the floor as soon
possible rather than leaving a puddle meant the hardwood floor dried before mole could get
started so it did not have to be replaced.
Please feel free to share my story with Insurance companies and others as you solicit funds for
this vital piece of fire fighting equipment.
Sincerely,
It.-
Gabbert & Beck -
3510 GALLERIA, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55435 -4269
(612) 925 -4321 Fax (612) 925 -2965
DATE: July 17, 2006
A
TO: Merchants
FROM: Warren Beck
RE: Westin Edina Galleria
If you have driven by or through the east side of our parking lot, you'll know
that the new ramp is well underway. As we head into this exciting phase, we
truly appreciate your enthusiasm and participation in the project. In fact,
nearly all Galleria merchants have put their full support behind it; and the
support of the community and city has been tremendous. Also, you may have
seen in last week's Sun Current that nearly two - thirds of the condominiums
have been reserved.
We want to make you aware that one of our tenants, Barnes and Noble, has
chosen to take legal action to try to stop the project. We believe that we will
prevail in the legal proceedings and that the project will continue on
schedule. While their lawsuit against the hotel and condominiums is pending,
Galleria staff and the Westin Edina Galleria team cannot comment further on
this legal matter. We appreciate your understanding that we cannot provide
details to you at this time.
Please know that we all remain fully committed to the project. We believe, as
many of you do, that the Westin Edina Galleria Hotel and Residences will be
a prized asset to the community, city, and to the Galleria.
Thank you
1Q1
Bike -Walk Advisory Council Members
(confirmed as of 7/14/06)
1.
Shonda Allen
Powderhorn Park Neighborhood Assoc. (Elena Gaarder — alternate)
2.
Lisa Austin
Twin Cities Bicycle Coalition, State Bicycle Advisory Committee
3.
Chuck Ballentine
Hennepin County Housing Community Works, and Transit Director
4.
Billy Binder
Hennepin County Bike Adv. Comm., Mpls. Bicycle Advisory Committee
S.
John Dillery
Metropolitan Transit, Senior Transit Planner (Craig Lamothe — alt)
6.
Michael Foster
Minneapolis Disability Advisory Council
7.
Shawntera Hardy
City of St. Paul Planning Department, planner
8.
Katie Hatt
Longfellow Neighborhoods Executive Director
9.
Michael Huber
Public Health Active Living leader
10.
Connie Kozlak
Metropolitan Council Planner (James Andrew — alternate)
11.
Robert Lilligren
Minneapolis City Council (Sandy Colvin Roy — alternate)
12.
Christine Manning
psychologist specializing in fostering sustainable behavior
13.
Nick Mason
Dero Manufacturing, Mpls Bike Advisory Committee
14.
Tim Mitchell
Federal Highway Administration - Minnesota Division
15.
Louis Moore
Office of Congressman Sabo
16.
Gay Noble
Streets for People, pedestrian advocate
17.
Joan Pasiuk
University of Minnesota Public Health
18.
Antonio Rosell
C -D -G Design Group, urban planner and engineer
19.
RT Rybak
Mayor of Minneapolis. (Peter Wagenius, alternate)
20.
Steve Sanders
University of Minnesota Parking and Traffic Division
21.
Gary Sjoquist
Quality Bicycle Products, Bikes Belong director
22.
Scott Smedberg
Andersen School, Mpls. Parks — liaison for immigrant communities
23.
Russ Stark
Midway TMO Executive Director
24.
Robert Vanasek
Office of Congressman Oberstar
25.
Jon Wertjes
City of Minneapolis Department of Public Works
26.
Bob Works
I Mn /DOT Transit Division, Bike and Pedestrian Section Director
TLC Staff: Steve Clark, Barb Thoman, Katie Eukel
TLC Board Reps: Chuck Holtman, Greg Pratt, Bill Smith
Budget and Timeline
TLC anticipates that about 1/3 of the expendable funds will be used for non - infrastructure programs and
projects, including ped /bike operations (markings, signage, etc.). This means that the City of
Minneapolis may be passing through to TLC as much as $8 million over a four or five year period. TLC
will also be directing the allocation of the funds for the construction of new facilities (infrastructure) and
Mn /DOT will provide reimbursement directly to the grantees. The City of Minneapolis, adjoining
municipalities to Minneapolis, Hennepin County and Ramsey County are all potential recipients for these
funds.
It is anticipated that a project solicitation process will be announced later this summer with major projects
selected for funding in early 2007. Much of the focus in 2006 will be on assessing the existing conditions
and determining where the greatest needs are. After the baseline data is collected in September 2006,
some low -cost improvements will be advocated and funded perhaps as early as October. It is also
anticipated that there will be a public information campaign launched during the fall 2006.
L 'Ickes aS�` �
�� -�
Non - motorized Transportation Pilot Project Update
July 17,2006
After six months of detailed discussions with federal, state and local agencies, Transit for Livable
Communities (TLC) will proceed with a $25 million 4 -year federal pilot program intended to help people
reduce dependence on automobiles by improving walking and bicycling conditions in the Minneapolis
area. On June 1, 2006, TLC's Work Plan (attached) received formal approval from the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA).
Tim Mitchell, FHWA transportation specialist at the Minnesota Division said he was pleased with the
Work Plan and was encouraged by TLC's commitment to strong public involvement and "making this a
truly collaborative effort."
The Non - motorized Transportation Pilot Project (NTP) was authorized by the Federal Government last
August as part of the SAFETEA -LU transportation bill. The Minneapolis area is one of four communities
designated to serve as a pilot in determining "the extent to which bicycling and walking can carry a
significant part of the transportation load, and represent a major portion of the transportation solution."
The other three pilot communities are Sheboygan, WI; Marin County, CA; and Columbia, MO. Only in
Minnesota was an independent non - profit (TLC) designated to carry out the program.
The Work Plan submitted by TLC lists the City of Minneapolis as TLC's fiscal agent. Because the
program falls under the State Aid Process, the funds are first released to Mn /DOT by the FHWA. But
since Mn /DOT cannot allocate funds to a non - taxing authority, TLC needs a fiscal agent to carry out their
administrative duties under federal law.
Program Evaluation
TLC has been working closely with the FHWA's national office and other pilot project communities to
develop a rigorous methodology to evaluate and measure the success of this program. An RFP was
sent out to the University of Minnesota and several other public universities for this consulting service.
Baseline travel data will be collected in September 2006, and again in September 2010 at the end of the
pilot program to determine modal split among Minneapolis residents. The law also specifies that the
communities document health benefits, energy conservation, and pollution reduction. The selected .
university will provide an interim report (2007) and a final report (2010) to Congress with their findings.
TLC plans on supplementing the work by the consulting university with regular bike and ped counts at
many different locations, and With project specific measurements.
Protect / Location Eligibility ,
Using the language of the law and subsequent interpretations by the FHWA, the Work Plan clarifies the
kinds of projects that will be eligible for the federal funding, including the question of location. Funds can
be used for education and promotion as well as for the building of facilities. The focus is on Minneapolis
with consideration for access to Minneapolis from adjoining communities. The funds are available until
expended, require no match and cannot be used for other purposes.
Bike -Walk Advisory Council (B -WAC)
An Advisory Council will have its first meeting on July 18th at the City Hall. Its role is to advise the TLC
Board of Directors on which projects to fund, rating proposals on the basis of their ability to induce a shift
from driving to walking and bicycling. A selection criteria process will be recommended by B -WAC for
adoption by the TLC Board of Directors. The B -WAC will make recommendations to the TLC Board of
Directors for both infrastructure and non- infrastructure projects. TLC will also provide opportunities for
the broader public to have input throughout the project. The---.B-'W'- AC participants are listed .below:
Page 1 of 1
Darlene Wallin
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 12:53 PM
To: Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com
Cc: Darlene Wallin
Subjedt: FW: Message to the City Council Re: High rise development along France Avenue
Jennifer Bennerotte
Communications & Marketing Director
City of Edina
952 - 833 -9520
FAX 952 - 826 -0390
jennerotte @ci.edina.mn.us
From: Lorenzo Tunesi [mailto:lorenzo.tunesi @gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 10:45 AM
To: Jennifer . Bennerotte
Subject: Re: Message to the City Council Re: High rise development along France Avenue
Dear Members of the City Council,
Thank you for your continued interest in bike paths in Edina. The creation of a Bikeway Task Force is a
step in the right direction. Please keep moving in the direction of bike paths in Edina, they are an
amenity that is sorely lacking in our city.
Lorenzo Tunesi
4413 Ellsworth Drive
Edina, MN 55435
7/18/2006
VERY IMPORTANT:
City of Edina
Odd -Even Sprinkling Policy and Mid -day Ban
The Edina Public Works Department is reminding property owners to follow
the City's odd -even sprinkling policy, which went in to effect May 1 and
continues through August. In addition:
Mid -day Watering Ban: Lawn sprinkling will not be allowed between
the hours of 11 -mm. and S p.m.
Odd / Even: Homes and businesses with even - numbered addresses may
water their lawns on even - numbered dates of the week. Homes with odd -
numbered addresses may water on odd - numbered dates. For example, the
family living at 4532 Parkside Lane could water their lawn on even -
numbered dates such as June 22, 24, 26 and so on.
Reset your sprinkler: The Utility Department reminds property owners that
some automatic sprinkler systems must be reset at the end of months that
have 31 days because there are two odd - numbered dates in a row. Rain
sensors can be purchased for automatic sprinkler systems. A rain sensor is a
device that shuts off a sprinkler system if rain is detected. In addition to
conserving water, quickly repairing broken or misdirected water heads can
minimize utility bills.
If the weather becomes exceptionally dry for an extended period, additional
water restrictions might be put into place.
Thank you for your cooperation.
City of udi" ktilite ACpRrt`tcent
Revised 7 -17 -06
City Hall 952 - 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390
EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379
(3E3
00 CITY OF EDINA
.Edina Water Update
Watering Bans in effect:
Odd Even.
Mid -day -11 am to 5 pm
Edina Water Supply
• 18 Wells:
■ One down for emergency repairs,
■ Three down for scheduled repairs issues.
• Pumping Capacity (current):
■ 14 Wells .......... 13,600 gallons per minute
• Storage Capacity:
■ 6.5 million gallons
July 18, 2006
BA 332 1
Edina Water Demand
0: 13,335 Connections: 3
■ 6,700 Connections per given da for Odd / Even..
■ Typical Sprinkler - 3.5 gpm
■ Typical Day: ( Current Well Capacity is 13,600 gpm)
• 1/2 Of Connections = 23,000 gpm
1,380,000 gallons per hour
J,
• 1/ of Connections = 11,700 gpm
s
690,000 gallons per hour
July 18, 2006
C Edina Water Demands
• Fire Demand:
■ Typical House Fire — 1000 to 2000 gpm
■ 60,000 to 120,000 gallons per,fire
■ 1/3 Connections = 15,600 gpm
■ 11/2 hours to-2 hours to min pressure in system
a
July 18, 2006
BA 332 2
BA 332
Conclusion
"Not every property in the City can irrigate
their lawns at once."
Abide by the:
"Odd/ Even with midday (11 -5)
Sprinkling ban"
July 18, 2006
3
- RECP,EATIONAL FIRE APPLICATION & PERMIT
Edina Fire Department
6250 Tracy Avenue
Edina, MN 55436 -2580
IF (952) 826 -0330
Fax (952) 826 -0393
RECREATIONAL FIRE APPLICATION & PERMIT
Requirements listed below shall apply to all recreational fires
Page 1 of 2
1. All non - recreational fires shall be considered "open 10. An approved form of fire extinguisher shall be readily
burning" and a special permit shall be required. Open
available at all times. This may be an extinguisher,
burning permits may be requested at the Edina Fire
hose, or other equipment designed for such use.
Department Fire Prevention Bureau, during normal
11.
The wood to be burned shall be clean and produce
business hours.
little detectable smoke or odor. Only split and dry
2. Recreational fires must be on private property and the
fireplace wood, minimum 3 inches in diameter shall be
property owner shall make application for this permit.
used. No treated wood, construction materials, yard
3. Permits are valid only for the calendar year.
waste (leaves, grass, twigs, etc.) shall be burned.
4. Fires are not permitted between the hours of 12:00
12.
Oils, combustible and flammable liquids, rubber,
midnight and 7:00 a.m.
plastics, chemically treated materials, construction
5. Fires shall be contained within a fire ring, pit, or similar
materials, hazardous waste, and rubbish /trash, shall
device constructed for such use.
not be burned or used, as starting material. No
6. The fire shall not be located within 25 feet of any
flammable or combustible liquids shall be used to
structure unless contained in a fireplace or manufactured
kindle or rekindle a fire.
wood - burning appliance, designed for burning wood, and
13.
In all cases, the total fuel load of the fire shall not
having an enclosed firebox and /or screening.
exceed 3 feet in diameter and 2 feet in height.
7. The fire in a wood - burning appliance shall not be located
14.
The prevailing wind at the time of burning shall be
within 10 feet of structures.
away from nearby residences and must be less than 15
8. The area within a 5 -foot radius around the fire or device
mph.
shall be reasonably dear of combustibles. The area
15.
The fire must be attended at all times by at least one
directly above the fire shall be clear of all combustibles.
responsible person 18 years of age or older.
9. Notify your neighbors about your recreational fire.
16.
The fire must be completely extinguished before
leaving it unattended. (Use care when extinguishing
the fire to avoid throwing embers into the air and to
prevent damage if a manufactured device is in use.
Prior to starting the fire the permit holder shall contact the Edina Fire Department.
(952) 826 -0330
The Edina Fire Department or the MN DNR may restrict recreational fires during periods of high fire
danger. Traditionally, this has occured during the month of April until about May 15th. In such an
event, any outstanding open fire permits shall be rendered void. Fires may be ordered extinguished
and this permit revoked by the Fire Department if: a) any recreational fire requirement is violated, or b)
if a fire hazard exists or develops, or c) we receive valid complaints from your neighbors regarding the
fire or smoke. Observation of these requirements does not release persons of any liability for
damages that may result from a recreational fire.
* indicates a required field
* Name of
Homeowner
* Address
* Telephone
http:/ /www.ci.edina.nm.us /form/L6 -03a FireRecApplication.asp 7/17/2006
- RECI;EATIONAL FIRE APPLICATION & PERMIT Page 2 of 2
* Email
El I understand that some of the information provided on this form will be public
data. Public data is available to anyone who makes a request for such information.
My credit card number is not considered public data.
By selecting "Submit' below, I agree that I am a legal adult 18 years of age or older
and understand this permit does not release me of any liability for damages that may
result from the conducting of this recreational fire. Further, I agree to comply with all
recreational fire requirements listed above.
Submit
http://www.ci.edina.mn.us/form/L6-03a—FireRecApplication.asp 7/17/2006
MEMORANDUM
To: Edina City Council Members
From: Steering Committee of the Morningside Neighborhood Association
Re: Northeast Edina Transportation Study Draft Report
Date: July 16, 2006
The Steering Committee of the Morningside Neighborhood Association ( "MNA") met
Sunday, July 9, to discuss the Northeast Edina Transportation Study Draft Report prior
to its presentation by the Edina Transportation Commission ("ETC") to the Edina City
Council. Copies of the Draft Report and the revised Draft Report had been sent to all
Steering Committee members the week of June 26.
Steering Committee members expressed concern about several issues, specifically:
1. Cost — The Report fails to identify the costs of the proposed Residential Area Safety
Improvements and fails to recommend who should bear those costs. An e-mail from
ETC Chair Les Wanninger to the Edina City Council, dated July 3, states that
"Residential area safety improvements would be assessed against residents under
current Council practice. Staff will prepare a preliminary cost estimate and potential
assessments for the Master Plan."
and its recommendations. No public comment period should be
ined and residents notified by mail.
An example of the kind and extent of disclosure needed can be found in the Notice of
Public Hearing, dated July 1, 2005, for the hearing before City Council on July 19, 2005,
on sewer, water and street reconstruction in the Country Club neighborhood. The
Notice stated the estimated total project cost, estimated costs per assessable lot, the
work to be included in the estimated assessments, and the addresses of the lots
proposed to be assessed. A copy of the Notice is attached.
2. Speed Limits — MNA Steering Committee members brought the issue of residential
speed limits to the attention of Edina City Council members and the ETC after they
discovered in early February that Edina's Speed Limit Policy conflicted with Minnesota
law. Specifically, although Minnesota law empowers a municipality to reduce speed
limits on selected segments of residential roadways from 30 miles per hour (State
default speed limit) to 25 miles per hour, the Edina Speed Limit Policy stated, "The City
of Edina cannot legislate speed limits below 30 MPH." (See House of Representatives
Research Comment on Minnesota Speed Limits, copy attached.)
The ETC discussed residential speed limits with Sgt. Phil Larsen at its meeting on
February 16, 2006. Sgt. Larsen stated that he did not advocate citywide reduction,
but that neighborhood and street - specific factors influence the appropriateness of a 30
mph speed limit. At ETC meetings on April 20 and May 18, City staff opposed change in
City practice. Commissioners stated their desire for more tools to address speeding on
residential streets, resulting in a vote (3-2, with one abstention) to recommend to the
City Council that it adopt a revised Speed Limit Policy acknowledging that "Qualifying
residential roadway speed limits may be 25 MPH if adopted by the City Council for
specific segments of local, residential roadways." The City Council, at its meeting on
Jt�e 6, rejected the ETC recommendation.
Speeding traffic is a concern throughout northeast Edina. Vehicle speed was measured
at 20 locations in the study area. At 12 of these locations, 11 % or more of traffic in a 24-
hour period exceeded the 30 mph residential speed limit. At five locations, 20% or more
of traffic in a 24 -hour period exceeded 30 mph. These included Grimes Avenue
between Sunnyside Road and West 44th Street, 20 %; Grimes Avenue between Golden
Years Montessori School and Calvin Christian School (and adjacent to Weber
Park), 24 %; Edina Boulevard, 26 %; West 44th Street just east of Brookside Avenue,
33 %; and Sunnyside Road between Grimes and France avenues, 47 %.
The speed at which most motorists drive on a roadway indicates its safe high speed.
Data collected for this study measured most motorists in the study area driving at
speeds lower than 30 mph. 85th percentile speed (the speed under which most (85 %)
drivers are traveling) on ten of the 15 streets measured was below 30 mph. Average
speed on 11 of the 15 streets was at or below 25 mph. The Minnesota Department of
Transportation consumer publication on speed limits states "the speed that the majority
of people consider prudent is an important value [in determining] the maximum safe and
reasonable speed." A copy of the MnDOT publication "Speed Limit? Here's Your
Answer" is attached.
The MNa._tapr�n mmittee asks the [` until to reconsider Edina's Speed _Limit
Policy to allow for reduced spee limits on residential streets and school and park
Reduced speed limits on residential streets combined with enforcement is a
valuable tool that should not be excluded from Edina's tool box.
3. Depiction and Characterization of Traffic Volume Data - The Draft Report
characterizes traffic volume data in a manner that could mislead residents and create
expectations that may not be met by the solutions proposed.
The study area contains 40 streets of varying lengths. The Draft Report gives speed
data for 15 streets and volume data for 17 streets (fewer than half of the streets). Traffic
volumes exceeding 900 vehicles per day were measured on 12 different streets.
The Draft Report states (at pages 1, 8, 30) that "Daily traffic volumes on most
residential streets within the study area exceed 900 vehicles per day." Actually, daily
traffic volumes on fewer than one -third of the residential streets (12 of 40) within the
study area were measured as exceeding 900 vehicles per day.
2
In discussing acceptable residential street traffic volume, the Draft Report uses a
standard of 900 vehicles per day. The source for this standard is not provided. The
Metropolitan Council uses the guideline of less than 1,000 vehicles per day for local
streets. (See Functional Classification System Criteria for the Twin Cities Region, Edina
Transportation Plan, Figure D-6 and Northeast Edina Transportation Study, Appendix C:
Technical Memorandum, Figure 2 (copies attached).) The MNA Steering Committee
a rd
o se the Metro olita er standard is used, it must be one
that can be applied to all of Edina not just the current study area
In reporting daily traffic volumes, the Draft Report uses ranges, rather than numbers.
Streets carrying just over 900 vehicles are grouped with streets carrying up to 2,000
vehicles per day. So that the Draft Report gives residents an accurate understanding of
traffic volumes, actual numbers, not just ranges, should be reported as in past studies.
At first glance, the Draft Report may appear to depict concentration of traffic volume
because data on speed and volume was collected only on certain streets in the study
area (17 of 40, fewer than half). But higher volumes were measured on residential
streets located throughout the study area, including two north of West 4e Street for
which data was collected and supplied for the study by the City of St. Louis Park. The
highest - volume streets measured are:
West 44th Street (east of Brookside Avenue)
(west of France Avenue)
Wooddale Avenue (north of West 441h Street)
West 38th Street (Excelsior Blvd to France)
Wooddale Avenue (south of West 44th Street)
Sunnyside Road (between Grimes and France)
Quentin Avenue ( Wooddale to Excelsior)
collector
4,674 vehicles per day
3,655 vehicles per day
collector
3,165 vehicles per day
minor collector
3,103 vehicles per day"
local
2,496 vehicles per day
local
2,413 vehicles per day
minor collector
2,122 vehicles per day*
`Data collected and supplied for this study by the City of St. Louis Park, but not reported in Figure 2.
- Daily traffic volumes obtained by review of study data in the Engineering Dept. at Edina City Hall.
- The Metropolitan Council does not classify streets as residential or non - residential, but as local, collector
or arterial. Collector streets in this study area are also residential streets.
In discussing the cause(s) of high traffic volumes, the Draft Report does not ask or
answer the question: How much traffic is generated by the study area itself? The Draft
Report quantifies peak -hour afternoon traffic as 30% "diverting through." A reader can
infer that 70% of rash hour traffic is generated by the area itself. The Draft Report
characterizes the non- diverted/area- generated peak hour traffic as "very heavy for
residential areas" and not "calm or civil." What is the purpose of these characterizations
and what data supports them?
3
The Metropolitan Council provides a useful guideline for street function that, if included
in the Draft Report, may help balance residents' expectations of who should or should
not drive on "their" streets. According to the Metropolitan Council, local streets should
carry "short trips (under 2 miles) at low speeds." (See Functional Classification Criteria,
copy attached.) Longer trips may begin or end on local streets to connect to collectors
or arterials. Metropolitan Council publications state that if local trips are conducted on
local streets, the arterials remain less congested and better able to carry the longer,
regional trips they are designed to carry.
According to the study's measurement of through traffic, someone living at West 40th
Street and Upton Avenue near Lake Harriet (one mile from the study area) would be
considered to be "diverting through" the study area when traveling local streets home
from Highway 100. Similarly, an Edina resident traveling via Wooddale Avenue from
West 54th Street to Park Nicollet Medical Center, on Excelsior Boulevard between
Wooddale and Quentin avenues (a distance of 2.1 miles), would be considered to be
"diverting through" the study area while actually making a local trip.
Data about where vehicles "diverting though" began or ended their trips or the reason(s)
why motorists "diverted through" could have been gathered by this study had a
representative sample of motorists been stopped and asked during the license plate
study, or matches made to registered addresses, methods used in studies in other
communities. However, this study simply recorded the license plate numbers of vehicles
entering and leaving the study area and so has no data on these points.
The Draft Report predicts significant reduction in traffic on residential streets if the
arterial and intersection improvements it proposes are approved and implemented. The
MNA Steering Committee supports the proposed arterial and intersection improvements
on the grounds that they will benefit residents and business owners in Edina and
adjacent areas of southwest Minneapolis by improving traffic flow, reducing congestion
and avoidable crashes, and making the area a more desirable destination. However,
lack of data about diverted traffic and the fact that most of the traffic on residential
streets in northeast Edina is generated by the area itself creates concern that
expectations of significant reduction in traffic on residential streets may not be met.
4. onclusions _,The MNA Steering Committee encourages the Council to approve
e arterial and intersection improvements on the basis of their ability to reduce
congestion and improve travel conditions and safety, not their predicted ability to reduce
residential street volume. It urges the Council to reexamine its position on residential
speed limits in order to give the City another tool to address speeding in northeast
Edina. Finally, it asks that the Council schedule public comment on the Draft Report
only after the costs of residential safety improvements have been determined and
residents notified by mail of those costs and who will be responsible for them.
MNA Steering Committee Members (* present at July 9 meeting)
Paul Balthazor Marian Cracraft Arnold Hymanson Judy Plant* Gene Veit
Joni Kelly Bennett* Tim Frederick* Jennifer Janovy* Paul Thompson
Mary Carte* Mark Horton* Chris Johns* Mark Valgemae*
4
City of Edina
July 1, 2005
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
SEWER, WATER, AND STREET RECONSTRUCTION — PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENT NUMBERS A -213 & A -214 - COUNTRY CLUB AREA
The Edina City Council will meet at Edina City Hall, on Tuesday, July 19, 2005 at 7:00
PM, to consider the Public Hearing on Sewer, Water, and Street Reconstruction in the
Country Club Area. This hearing is being conducted under the authority granted by
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429.
This hearing has been called as a recommendation from staff. Improvement No. A -213
would be constructed during the 2006 construction season. With the exception of
sanitary sewer trunk pipe reconstruction along Casco and Drexel Avenues between
Country Club Road and Bridge Street, Improvement No. A -214 would be constructed
during the 2007 construction season. The sanitary sewer trunk pipe along Casco and
Drexel Avenues between Country Club Road and Bridge Street would be reconstructed
during the 2006 construction season. The assessment hearing for the entire project
would occur in October or November 2006.
The estimated total project cost is $13,300,000. The cost of the project will be funded by
special assessments and City utility enterprise funds. With the exception of 02 and 03
Edina court, the estimated cost per assessable lot is $12,600 per residential equivalent
unit. The estimated cost per assessable lot is $4,200 per residential equivalent unit for
02 and 03 Edina Court. A reasonable estimate of the impact of the assessment will be
available at the hearing. The assessment includes the reconstruction of the sanitary
sewer seraice pipe befiii/een the trunk pipe Wand the l ight-c, -wc.y lire, street lighting, and
street/sidewalk reconstruction. These assessments can be divided over a ten -year
period with interest accumulating on the unpaid balance.
The area proposed to be assessed the cost of the proposed improvements includes:
Improvement A -213
4500 to 4531, 4601 Arden Avenue; 4400 to 4515 Browndale Avenue; 4501 to 4531
Bruce Avenue; 4500 to 4532 Casco Avenue; 4500 to 4527 Drexel Avenue; 4500 to
4519 Edina Boulevard; 4500 to 4517 Moorland Avenue; 4100 to 4920 Sunnyside Road;
4500 to 4523 Wooddale Avenue.
City Hall
4801 WEST 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394
www.cityofedina.com
952 - 927 -8861
FAX 952 - 826 -0390
TTY 952 - 826 -0379
Improvement A -214
4600 to 4920 Arden Avenue; 4518 to 4909 Browndale Avenue; 4600 to 4919 Bruce
Avenue; 4600 to 4638 Casco Avenue; 4203 to 4409 Country Club Road; 4600 to 4633
Drexel Avenue; 4612 to 4640 Edgebrook Place; 4600 to 4621 Edina Boulevard; 02 to
03 Edina Court; 4600 to 4622 Moorland Avenue; 4600 to 4625 Wooddale Avenue.
Your receipt of this notice is an indication that property whose ownership is listed to you
is among those properties, which are considered to be benefited by the improvement.
Any inquiries, comments and /or suggestions you may have regarding this improvement
may be forwarded to the City Council or Engineering Department prior to the hearing or
presented at the hearing itself. If you desire additional information, please call Wayne
Houle at 952 - 826 -0443 or by email at whoule ci.edina.mn.us.
The City Council can authorize the proposed project immediately upon the close of the
hearing.
Sincerely,
a� .100V '00'4"
Wayne D. Houle, P.E.
Director of Public Works and City Engineer
Legislature Home Links to the World I Help I Advanced Search
Minnesota House of Representatives
House Research
House Senate I Joint Departments and Commissions Bill Search and Status Statutes, Laws, and Rules
Minnesota Speed Limits
• Basic law
• Statutory limits
• Speed zones
• Local authority
• Speed violations
Minnesota law sets speed limits on state and local highways and streets, and provides for the establishment of speed zones by the
Department of Transportation (MnDOT).
Basic law Minnesotais basic law on highway speeds is found in Minnesota Statutes, section 169.14,
subdivision 1:
No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable
and prudent under the conditions. t Every driver is responsible for becoming and
remaining aware of the actual and potential hazards then existing on the highway
and must use due care in operating a vehicle.
Statutory limits Minnesota law sets out the following speed limits:
2 Streets and highways in urban areas, 30 m.p.h.
2 Interstate highways outside urbanized areas of 50,000 or more, 70 m.p.h.
2 Interstate highways within urbanized areas of 50,000 or more, 65 m.p.h.
2 Noninterstate freeways and expressways, 65 m.p.h.
7, Other highways outside urban districts, 55 m.p.h
2 Streets inside urban districts, 30 m.p.h
7, Town roads in rural residential districts, 30 m.p.h.
E Alleys, 10 m.p.h.
An iurban districts is any segment of street or highway that is built up with structures less
than 100 feet apart for a distance of a quarter- mile.t A irural residential districti is a
segment of a town road with structures less than 300 feet apart for a distance of a
quarter -mile.
Speed limits within cities are absolute, meaning that any speed in excess of them is
automatically illegal.t Elsewhere speed limits are iprima facie limits,i meaning that any
speed in excess of them is prima facie evidence that the speed was illegal.t This means
that there is a presumption that the excess speed is illegal but the presumption may be
rebutted by other evidence.
Speed zones MnDOT has the authority to establish speed zones in which the speed limit is higher or
lower than the limits set in law.t Speed zones are established after MnDOT conducts an
engineering and traffic investigation that includes a segmentis design, physical
characteristics, traffic volume, accident history, and actual speeds.t Generally, MnDOT
believes that a speed limit at or near the i85th percentile speeds (the speed at or below
which 85 percent of vehicles are traveling) is most likely to be the safest maximum limit.t
Speed limits in speed zones are effective as soon as signs are erected.t Like statutory
limits, they are absolute limits within a city and prima facie limits outside cities.
Local authority The authority of a city, county, or town over speed limits is limited, even on its own
streets and highways.t A local road authority may ask MnDOT to conduct an engineering
and traffic investigation on a segment of local road, but the department makes the final
determination on the speed limit on that segment.
There are a few exceptions to this general rule:
2 On a residential roadway, defined as a segment up to a half -mile that is
functionally classified as local, a local resolution may reduce the speed limit
from 30 m.p.h. to 25 m.p.h.t
Y, In school zones, defined as a segment of street or highway that abuts
school grounds where children have access to the roadway or where a school
crossing is established, a local road authority may prescribe a lower speed
limit that is not less than 15 m.p.h. or more than 20 m.p.h. below the
surrounding limit.
Y, On a park road within a local park a local authority may prescribe a
lower speed limit that is not less than 15 m.p.h. or more than 20 m.p.h. below
the surrounding limit.
Both MnDOT and local road authorities can set speed limits within their own highway
work zones, to be effective while highway workers are on the job.t A work zone speed
limit cannot be less than 20 m.p.h. or reduce the speed limit in the work zone by more
than 15 m.p.h. The maximum work zone speed limit is
55 m.p.h. on divided highways and 40 m.p.h. on other highways.
Speed violations Under most circumstances, speeding is a petty misdemeanor punishable by a maximum
penalty of a $300 fine.t However, if a speeding violation is committed in such a manner
as to endanger persons or property, it can be charged as a misdemeanor with maximum
penalties of a $1,000 fine and 90 days in jail.t Speeding violations of more than 20
m.p.h. over the legal limit result in a surcharge equal to the amount of the original fine,
with a $25 minimum.
Minnesota does not have a point system on driveris licenses, but a third petty
misdemeanor in a year can be charged as a misdemeanor, and a third misdemeanor in a
year can result in a driveris license revocation.t A speed of 100 m.p.h. or more results in
at least a six -month license revocation.
Under the iDimler amendment,i named after its author, former Rep. Chuck Dimler, a
violation of a 55 m.p.h. speed limit by not more than 10 m.p.h., or of a 60 m.p.h. limit by
not more than 5 m.p.h., is not recorded on a motoristis driving record.
For more informatiowt Contact legislative analyst John Williams at 651 - 296 - 5045.1
January 2006
Return to Transportation
Retum to House Research home
MN Statute 169.14
Speed laws are created for the protection of
the public and the curbing of unreasonable
behavior. To effectively enforce a law, the
public must believe that the law is
reasonable. Minnesota's speed regulations are based on the
same Basic Speed Law that is used in all 50 states: "No
person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater
than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions ".
Statutory limits are based on the concept that uniform
categories of highways can operate safely at certain preset
maximum speeds under ideal conditions. Whether the speed
limit is posted or umposted, drivers are required to reduce
speed below these values for poor weather conditions, curves
or hills and potential hazards such as pedestrians. Drivers
must also reduce speed when approaching or passing
emergency vehicles with emergency lights flashing.
These are the most common statutory speeds:
10 mph in alleys
30 mph on streets in urban districts
70 mph on rural interstate highways
65 mph on urban interstate highways
65 mph on expressways
55 mph on other roads
Whenever these statutory speed limits are not the correct
value for a specific highway, the commissioner of
transportation authorizes the posting of other regulatory
speed limits.
The commissioner of transportation sets regulatory speed
limits on state and local roads based on a thorough
engineering and traffic investigation.
These factors are considered:
road type and condition
location and type of access points (intersections,
entrances, etc.)
j sufficient length of roadway (1/4 Hole minimum)
i existing traffic control devices (signs, signals, etc.)
crash history
j traffic volume
j sight distances (curve, hill, etc.)
test drive results
speed study
The most important part of the traffic investigation is the
speed study. When choosing a speed, drivers take many
roadway environment factors into consideration. Therefore,
the speed that the majority of people consider prudent is an
important value. Data is collected by performing radar
checks at selected locations on the roadway under ideal
driving conditions. A technical analysis is done on the results
to determine the 85th percentile. This is the value indicating
the speed at which most (85 %) drivers are traveling under.
Experience has shown that a posted speed limit near this
value is the maximum safe and reasonable speed. Studies
have shown that traveling much faster or slower than this
value can increase your chance of being in a crash.
Engineering judgement is an important tool. The traffic
IntemtateS are high design multilane divided highways investigator must use knowledge of nationally accepted
that have controlled access interchanges such as cloverleafs principles combined with experience to assign the safe speed.
or diamond shaped interchanges. Through traffic on the
interstate never has to stop or yield. Examples: I -94 or! -35 ONES° 4
August 2002
® il Expressvwry S are multi lane divided highways but they nJ Minnesota Department of Transportation
have entries and intersections, sometimes controlled by ? ¢ Office enTraffic Engineering e
ms
trattie signals. Some interchanges may exist bud they are fti Intelligent Transportation Systems
not the rule. Examples: Highway 10 or Highway 52 T oc i arch
', w.dot.state.mn.usltraf iceng
C
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM CRITERIA FOR THE TWIN CITIES REGION
�oyu„auw�'WWY r'ISn. MR; 18ow F-1
Metropolitan Council FIGURE
Functional Classification Criteria
D-6
Collector
Local
Urban
Rural
Urban
Rural
Criterion
System Mileage
Suggested federal limitations: 5-
10 percent
Suggested federal limitations: 20-
25 percent
Suggested federal limitations: 65-
80 percent
Suggested federal limitations: 63-
75 percent
Percent of Travel -VMT
Suggested federal limitations: 5-
10 percent
Suggested federal limitations: 20-
35 percent
Suggested federal limitations: 10-
30 percent
Suggested federal limitations: 5-
20 percent
Intersections
Four -way stops and some traffic
signals.
Local street traffic should be required
to stop.
As required.
As required.
Parking
Restricted as necessary.
Unrestricted.
Permitted as necessary.
Permitted as necessary.
Large Trucks
Restricted as necessary.
Restricted as necessary.
Permitted as necessary.
Permitted as necessary.
Management Tools
q
Number of lanes, traffic signal timing,
land access management.
Land access management.
Intersection control, cul-de -sacs,
diverters.
As necessary.
Vehicles Carried
1,000- 15,000
250 -2,500
Less than 1,000
Less than 1,000
Posted Speed Limit
30-40 mph
3545 mph
Maximum 30 mph
Maximum 30 mph
Right-of-Way
60-100 feet
60-100 feet
50 -80 feet
50 -80 feet
Transit Accommodations
Cross- sections and geometrics
designed for use by regular -route
buses.
None.
Normally uses as bus routes only in
non- residential areas.
None.
�oyu„auw�'WWY r'ISn. MR; 18ow F-1
Metropolitan Council FIGURE
Functional Classification Criteria
D-6
Functional Classification
Principal Arterial
"A "Minor Arterial
"B" Minor Arterial
Collector
� Less than 900 vehicles /day
900 -2,000 vehicles /day
� 2,000- 2,500vehicles /day
3,000 -5,000 vehicles /day
� Over 5,000 vehicles /day
v
v
v
0
a
Y
O
O
m
Interlachen Blvd
a
ce\S`ot a
0
40th St
a a +
0
C °o
C
J rp O
r
42nd St
W
v
E
00 Morningside Rd
—Po
O
O
AA'LkN
Sunnyside R
d
4
d
>
¢
> v
a
c
O
O
W
X
v
CD
Q
rQ
50th St
16,000+
8,000
26�pp0 +
v
a
v
O
0
54th St
POLICY MAP
NOTE:
Average Daily Traffic
Local Street: < 1,000 vehicles /day
Collector: 1,000 - 15,000
vehicles /day
NORTHEAST EDINA TRANSPORTATION STUDY
CONSULTMCGRUUTAW Current Transportation Problems and Issues Technical Memorandum
10,000+
W
X
X
Figure 2
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM CRITERIA FOR THE TWIN CITIES REGION
Cri
Place Connections
Spacing
IISystem Connections and
Access Spacing*
II Trip- Making Service
Urban
IInterconnect neighborhoods and minor
business concentrations within the
MUSA. Provide supplementary
interconnection of major generators
within the metro centers and regional
business concentrations.
Metro centers and regional business
concentrations:
1/8- 1/2 mile
Fully developed area: r/ - 3A mile
Developing area: '$ -I mile
Sometimes to interstate freeways and
other principal arterials. To minor
arterials, other collectors and local
streets.
Short trips (1-4 miles depending on
development density) at low to
moderate speeds. Longer trips
accessing the arterial network. Local
Mobility vs. Land Access- Equal emphasis on mobility and land
access. Direct land access
Predominantly to development
concentrations.
Souros: Metropolitan r unap Traneportatlon P
o0ay Plan,188T, Table Fl
' The key objective is stated under "Management" heading in this table.
Rural
Provide supplementary
interconnection among rural growth
centers inside the Twin Cities region
and comparable places near the Twin
Cities region.
Permanent Rural and Agricultural
Areas : As needed in conjunction with
minor arterials, to provide adequate
interconnection of places identified in
"Place Connections" criterion. In
addition, minor collectors should be
designated at an average spacing of
not less than 4 miles.
To minor arterials, other collectors
and local streets.
Urban
Interconnect blocks within residential
neighborhoods and land parcels within
commercial/ industrial developments.
As needed to access land uses.
To a few minor arterials. To
collectors and other local streets.
Short trips (under 2 miles) at low
speeds. Longer trips accessing the
collector or collector and arterial
network.
Emphasis on land access, not on
mobility. Direct land access
predominantly to residential land uses.
Metropolitan Council
Functional Classification Criteria
Local
-- �^
Rural
As needed to access land uses.
To a few minor arterials. To collectors
and local roads.
Emphasis on land access not on
mobility. Direct land access
Predominantly to agricultural land uses.
FIGURE
D -5
6
I
c
}
Courtney Fields Shelter'.Building
r
m 0,
January
19
17, 2006, City Council
Meeting
Approved'2006 CIP Budget
•$450,000
for
building
replacement.
9$312,000
for
field #
Planning Stage
is Anderson /Johnson & ATSR conducted
feasibility study.
• Program design input committee:
1.Kathryn Peterson
2.Dave Engler
3.Chip Howard
4. Park & Rec. Staff
Program Design Input Committee
Recommendations
• Bathrooms ADA accessible.
• Bathroom access from exterior.
• Adequate size concessions stand that
meets current health codes.
• Serve as weather shelter space.
• Eliminate scoring /announcing booth.
• Sound system & scorina controlled from
v
dugouts.
Program Design Input Committee
Recommendations
• Adequate secure &safe storage for
concessions product and various equipment.
• Adequate maintenance storage area.
• Adequate electric service secured from public
access.
• Operational drinking fountains.
• Display case and trophy case.
• Bulletin board.
• Safety netting to protect the public from errant
baseballs.
Lobby
Storage
Mezzanine and ships ladder
Feasibility Study Summary
• Building lacks square footage to meet the needs
of the shelter space, especially storage and
concessions.
• The roof system &mezzanine space have a very
short life left and should be removed &replaced.
• The toilets should be made ADA accessible.
• Access to mezzanine via the ships ladder is
unsafe.
• Concessions stand needs to be reworked to be
more efficient and meet current health codes.
• Existing masonry wall could remain if they
enhance planning for an updated facility.
Feasibility Study
Recommendations
• - Remove existing roof structure.
• Maintain existing exterior walls, plumbing walls,
electrical walls, footings and foundations.
• Remove interior partitions to provide for ADA
accessible toilets, electrical room and storage
needs.
• Relocate restroom access to the exterior for use
during hours the shelter is not open.._
• Provide new roof structure with second story
storage but eliminate upper level
scoring /announcing booth.
• If affordable, add patio space for grilling &
garnering space.
Design Approach — New Facility
Maintain exterior and utility walls
.-Additional concession space
- crease storage
E
a
nm rum lim w t.-W
FIRST LEVEL PLAN,
ux
- Create outdoor patio
- Create observation deck
. ADA accessible toilets
nm � k
SECOND. LEVEL,PLAN
s
ROOF PLAN
w
- Create outdoor patio
- Create observation deck
. ADA accessible toilets
nm � k
SECOND. LEVEL,PLAN
s
ROOF PLAN
;sign Approach — New Facility
asic Roof over main structure
ccent Roof over concession and deck
arrel Roof — Vocabulary of ice arena
- Image from upper lot
- Good Site lines from
observation deck
jam 0"Alwo
Cw 0M %M 0"AnEw
NORTH ELEVATION EAST AND WEST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATI
Estimated Costs City of Edina
Preliminary Project Cost Estimate
Courtney Field Shelter Building
Addition and Alterations
Remove exiting roof structure, maintain existing exterior walls, plumbing walls and electrical panel wall
Remodeling includes ADA accessible toilet rooms, shelter space, and storage.
Addition includes first floor concessions, second floor
storage and exterior observation deck.
Cost per Estimate
Square Feet
Square Foot
Demo roof structure 1,150
$ 15.00
17,250
Remodel existing shell 1,150
$ 125.00
143,750
New roof and second floor 1,150
$ 75.00
86,250
Addition 300
$ 250.00
75,000
Deck with partial roof above 400
$ 50.00
20,000
Patio 600
$ 8.00
4,800
Site Restorations
20,000
20,000
Estimated bid date Spring 2006 Costs Jan 2006
10% per year
9,176
Occupy May -07
Design contingency
10%
37,623
Construction Subtotal Cost
413,849
Estimated Costs
Courtney Field Shelter Building
New Building
Demo existing building
1500 SF New construction
Demo Existing building
New Construction first floor
New Construction second floor
Deck with partial roof above
Patio
Site Restorations
Estimated bid date Spring 2006
Occupy
Design contingency
400 $ 50.00
600 $ 8.00
20,000
Costs Jan 2006 10% per year
May -07
10%
Construction Subtotal Cost
20,000
4,800
20,000
13,514
55,406
609,470
Cost per
Estimate
Square Feet
Square Foot
1,150
$ 30.00
34,500
1,500
$ 250.00
375,000
1,150
$ 75.00
86,250
400 $ 50.00
600 $ 8.00
20,000
Costs Jan 2006 10% per year
May -07
10%
Construction Subtotal Cost
20,000
4,800
20,000
13,514
55,406
609,470
Preliminary Total Construction Cost
Estimates
• Original building estimate $413,849
• Expanded concessions area 25,000
• Concession cabinetry/island 5,000
• Low maintenance concrete block 4,000
• Ceramic tile walls (low maint.) 4,000
• Quarry tile floor in lobby 4,200
• Safety netting (previously not incl.)12,000
• Field #4 renovation 250,000
TOTAL ESTIMATE $726,049
Bids Opened on June 28, 2006
Three Bids Received
Contractor:
Base Bid:
Alternate #1 (utilities)
Alternate #2 (plaza)
Rachel Contracting
$809,963
18,500
5,400
Alternate #3 (quarry tile) 4,200
Bids Opened on June 28, 2006
Three Bids Received
Contractor: Meisi-nger Construction
Base Bid: $855,000
Alternate #1 (utilities)
Alternate #2 (plaza)
Alternate #3 (quarry tile)
32,800
6,000
5,300
Bids Opened on June 28, 2006
Three Bids Received
Contractor: CM Construction
Base Bid: $894,800
Alternate #1 (utilities) 32,000
Alternate #2 (plaza) 6,000
Alternate #3 (quarry tile) 6,000
Staff &Consultant Recommend
Alternate #1
• Alternate #1 includes installation of sanitary
sewer and water lines from shelter building to
outside of field #4 to future
maintenance garage building.
• Maintenance garage replacement is a
proposed 2007 CIP project.
• Rachel Construction alternate #1 bid is
$18,500.
Bid Results With. Alternate #1
Rachel Contracting
Meisinger Construction
CM Construction
lee 0
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS
Rachel Contracting Base Bid
Alternate #1 (utilities)
Soft Costs
Seeding Contractor
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS
$809,963
18,500
70,544
6,000
$905,007
VALUE ENGINEERING
Revise steel trusses to wood
Omit frost foundation at dugout
Use concrete masonry units that
require epoxy paint
Use standard prime paint for
structural steel members
Use standard prime paint on
exterior stairs
Electrical modification
Omit east canopy
TOTAL REDUCTIONS
$22,500
7,100
12,000
1,190
2,100
1
24,400
$70,140
Delay Other 2006 CIP Projects
Renovate Chowen Park Picnic Shelter
Upgrade Keyless Entry System
Renovate Key /Core Security System
France Avenue Off -leash Dog Area
TOTAL
$15,000
20,000
14,000
30,000
$79,000
BUDGET
i ocai erojecc i,osis ayuo,uvi
2006. CIP. Budget Building $4505000
2006 CIP Budget Field 31:29000
Value Engineering. Reductions- 70,140
Delay 200&-C[P Projects 79,000
TOTAL $911,140
rivc
MIKM
■7N, fimill
A
,1
J
4
f
,
sit4s
r= ^
WY
f
e
Recommendation
•Staff and consultants recommend
award of bid to Rachel Contracting for
$828,463 which includes base bid and
alternate #1.
J
- - - --- ---------