Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-08-15_COUNCIL MEETINGCONTEMPORARY RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION ISSUES IN REGARDS TO TEAR DOWN DEVELOPMENT IN Edina, Minnesota AUGUST 15 2006 HAY DOBBS US Bank Plaza, Suite 165 220 South Sixth Street „m Minneapolis, MN 55402 T. 612.338.4590 F. 612.3374042 Table of Contents Executive Summary Chapter I Introduction: Edina's Historic Periods and Change Chapter II Case Studies -Atlanta, Georgia *Boulder, Colorado *Chapel Hill, North Carolina *Evanston, Illinois •Oak Park, Illinois -Rockville, Maryland Chapter III Methods of Evaluation •Faceprints *National Register Guidelines •Visual Impact Assessment Chapter IV Alternate Methods of Regulation • Flex Zoning • Community Education • Tax Incentives Chapter V Task Force Findings and Recommendations HAY DOBBS P.A. US Bank Plaza, Suite 165 220 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.338.4590 Cover Image: Source From the Collections of the Mlnnewn Historical Society Circa 1940 new housing In Edina Executive Summary The American residential landscape has taken a surprising turn. Over the last several decades, we've believed that large new houses were only built in "sprawl" suburbs on the metro edge. But the market and cultural forces behind them is now heavily affecting established, inner -ring suburbs. "Tear down" construction can be described as a complement to sprawl, providing the homeowner the best of both worlds. The process of demolishing an older residence within an established first ring neighborhood gives developers the ability to construct large homes formerly associated with gated communities and development on former farmland without the extended commute. However, as this type of development becomes more frequent, the drawback to tear down development is becoming increasingly apparent. Immediate concerns are how these new homes loom over adjacent properties, and how the bulk of the structure affects the entire neighborhood. Other concerns involve the rights of property owners and affect the value of surrounding homes. As a historic suburb, Edina is also experiencing the effects of tear down development. On several occasions, community members have expressed their concerns regarding new residential construction not in character with their neighborhood. Recognizing that the phone calls will only increase in number, the City of Edina created a task force in order to examine tear down construction in the city. Hay Dobbs, P.A. worked in conjunction with the task force to prepare this document describing a number of possible future policy, public education and tax incentive options. As a national trend, the reaction to tear downs and the policy written to address it vary greatly. This report documents the actions and procedures executed by six communities in order to manage tear down construction while allowing for future development to occur. r HAY OOBM 6 Introduction Source: From the Collections of the Minnesota Historical Society Aerial New of Edna and Lake Harvey American suburbs are not homogenous. Nor are they entirely new. Since the 181h century, Americans have lived on the outskirts of the business districts in which they worked. Like many established suburbs, Edina was once a free - standing farm community that was later surrounded by urban expansion. As a community, Edina represents many of the most significant residential architecture and site planning trends of the 201h century. It is a collection of neighborhoods, often built by one developer and planner. Each has its own scale and character - defining features. One of the most important lessons of the city's design history is that no single set of regulations can guide compatible infill development for the future. Rather, each neighborhood has a character of its own dependent on street layout, lot size, topography, spatial patterns, vegetation, architectural style, scale, materials and massing. Each of these variables adds up to a rich tableau with a character that can be respected by new construction that does not necessarily have to literally mimic the past. 7 HAY�OOBBS Chapter I: Edina's Historic Periods and Change Source From the collections of the Minnesota Historical Society 8 "The challengefor stewardingneighborhood identity is: can neighborhood, architecture, character and scale be documented and respected while remaining relevant for modern needs ?" In the 201h century, a number of social and entrepreneurial forces shaped the development and quality of housing in emerging suburbs such as Edina. These include the Better Homes movement of the 1920s and the influential housing and subdivision principles of the Federal housing Administration in the 1930s.' The Small House Architect' Service Bureau was established in Minneapolis in 1919 with the goal of making architect- designed plans available to builders nationwide. Sponsored by the American Institute of Architects, this non - profit organization helped to make quality architect affordable for many. Edina's oldest neighborhoods such as Morningside reflect the relatively small scale and stylistic diversity of housing options during this time. Many houses were built from pattern books like those of the Small House Service Bureau or even pre - manufactured and shipped to the site offering significant value for the price. The challenge for stewarding neighborhood identity is: can neighborhood, architecture, character and scale be documented and respected while remaining relevant for modern needs. Source: From the Collections of the Minnesota Historical Society Source: Frorn the Collections of the Minnesota Historical Society THE COUNTRY CLUB ERA Developed by Thorpe Bros., Edina's Country Club District is the state's premier example of inter -war era planned residential development. Designed with unified covenants for housing style and size, the overall neighborhood mirrored national trends of the time with its picturesque curving roads and accommodation for the rising importance of the automobile. Houses were designed in nostalgic period - revival styles including Tudor Revival, Colonial Revival and French Norman Revival among others. More ominously, Edina's Country Club District, like most of its counterparts nationwide, was racially- restricted, with minorities allowed to reside there only as domestic servants. This policy continued until outlawed by a Supreme Court fair housing ruling in 1948. FINE - GRAINED NEIGHBORHOODS: 1935 -1950 Just before and after WWII, developers such as Carl Hansen and Bloomberg Builders built well - detailed houses in the eastern part of the city near France Avenue. Today, streets such as Halifax Lane contain unified collections of small houses, many under 2,000 SF at a fine- grained scale. Now over fifty years old, such neighborhoods may be eligible for nomination to the National Register of Historic Places for their architectural quality, integrity and representation of an important chapter in social history. Yet, because of their fine grained scale, the historic spatial patterns of such areas is highly vulnerable and could easily be weakened by renovation or rebuilding of wider or taller houses. AUTOMOBILE SCALE AND ACCESS Unlike much of Minneapolis and Saint Paul, Edina was built around the automobile and not the streetcar. A major factor in Edina's growth was the development of "Lilac Way" or the beltline highway that is now Hwy. 100. Initiated in the 1930s, Lilac Way introduced to Minnesota new highway concepts being pioneered in the German autobahns including limited access, cloverleafs, and directional separation. As part of the nationwide park improvements efforts of the New Deal CCC and WPA, relief workers build charming rest stops with limestone pools, benches, tables and historical markers. 9 THE PASTORAL MODERN NEIGHBORHOOD: 1950 -1970 After World War II, developer - builders such as Carl Hansen and Ecklund & Swedlund worked with some of Minnesota's most experienced landscape architects, especially the venerable firm of Morell & Nichols to plan numerous mid - century subdivisions. By the 1950s, the influence of Frank Lloyd Wright's prairie style horizontal roofs and functional "Usonian" houses had filtered down to the developers' vernacular. Edina's subdivisions of the 1950s, such as Parkview Circle, are home to superb examples of upper -level housing from this era, with three to five bedroom homes on large lots. Many Edina houses of this era are well- crafted with stone exterior elements, hardwood floors and plaster walls. GROWING SIZES FOR NEW HOUSES: CONTEXT FOR THE TEAR DOWN PHENOMENON Throughout all of these historic chapters, the average size of Edina's houses has grown. This tradition continues today. The median size for a new American house is today 2162 SF, up more than 600 SF since 1975.2 According to the National Association of Home builders, 18 percent of the houses built in 2001 provided at least 3,000 SF of living space. Seventeen percent of American homes now have garage space for at least three cars.3 In understanding homeowner desires to tear down and build larger, we should consider how most new houses are produced in the country today. Architects design fewer than 5% of new houses for specific owners. Rather, builders, as they have been for over a century, design most houses. Since 1980, many national developers such as Toll Brothers have come to the Twin Cities to compete with local builders. They term their houses their "product" and create essentially standardized designs that can be customized with options for home entertainment systems, bathrooms, kitchens and detailing. Developers compete on the allure of live -in kitchens, spa baths, and impressive "Great Rooms," all of which add to the overall footprint. HAY OOBBS 10 Source: From the Collections of the Minnesota Historical Society source: Fran the Collections of the Minnesota Historical Society Sourcc From the Conections of the Minnesota Historical Society Source: From the Collections of the Minnesota Historical Society ( Endnotes) 1. National Register Bulletin. Historic Residential Suburbs: Guidelines for Evaluation and Documentation for the National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 2002. 2. "Are McMansions Going Out of Style ?" by Fred A. Bernstein, New York Times, October 2, 2005. 3. National Association of Homebuilders, Housing Facts, Figures and Trends, 2001. 4. "Big builder on the prowl," Jon Gartner, New York Times 5. Protecting America's Historic Neighborhoods: Taming the Teardown Trend, by Adrian Scott Fine and Jim Lindberg, National Trust for Historic Preservation, 2002. According to a New York Times article reprinted in the Star Tribune, one in four new American houses is built by a large publically- traded builder. "Several Wall Street analysts and most of the big home builders seem confident that their companies will build half of all new houses in the United States within 10 years.. " One of the greatest challenges for these "custom" builders is to acquire land on which to develop new houses either on speculation or as pre -sold. The growth limitation of the Municipal Urban Service Area (MUSA) posed by the Metropolitan Council limit new building and available land. Increasing traffic to distant suburbs such as Plymouth, Maple Grove and Victoria are also making inner -ring, well - located suburbs such as Edina increasingly attractive. The conflict between older Edina neighborhoods and new or renovated construction today occurs when homeowners seek to live in the community yet achieve the spatial scale and character of new houses on the suburban fringe where lots are generally larger and there exist no smaller homes in the context. NATIONWIDE REACTION TO "MCMANSIONS" Recently, there has been a growing reaction to the large house trend nationwide with homeowners seeking new alternatives. Based in Massachusetts, the Taunton Press publishes "dwell books," the most celebrated of which are the Not So Big House series by former Minnesota architect, Sarah Susanka. To date, her books have sold well over a million copies reflecting a deep desire among many to live in smaller, but more thoughtfully- designed homes tailored to their needs. In 2002, The National Trust for Historic Preservation documented more than 100 communities in 20 states that are experiencing significant numbers of tear downs.' Often located in inner -ring suburbs near vibrant economic centers, the tear down phenomenon introduces new or expanded houses of 3,000 to 10,000 SF in neighborhoods of much smaller bulk and height. An Internet search on the pejorative keyword "McMansions" yields surprisingly abundant results, many of which focus on neighborhood dismay at new construction. Such a search leads to many of the community ordinances and policies across the country that are discussed in the pages to follow. The National Trust Study listed a number of policy and zoning procedures now being applied by affected communities. II HAY OOBBS �� 12 Chapter II: Case Studies To determine the most appropriate course of action if for the City of Edina, the study of other communities facing similar issues is a valuable tool for considering regulatory options. The following case studies describe how six communities addressed tear down construction through the use of zoning regulation and ordinances. In some cases, the use of regulation proved controversial and was ultimately rejected or pared back. These case studies provide context for understanding the nationwide reactions to tear downs and larger houses. They can help Edina to decide what steps, if any, are required to address the neighborhood change with architectural guidelines. The list of communities is as follows: • Atlanta, Georgia • Boulder, Colorado • Chapel Hill, North Carolina • Evanston, Illinois • Oak Park, Illinois • Rockville, Maryland 13 �� Atlanta and Dekalb County, Georgia Regulation Type: Criteria for Selection: Nomination & Approval: Activities Regulated: Managed By Approved: 1. HAY == 14 None, at this time. Zoning code update under study by task force NA NA NA NA NA In Atlanta, extreme traffic congestion in new suburbs is accelerating the tear down phenomenon within the Perimeter, the older core of the region. Many of Atlanta's new infill houses are three times the national median size (2162 SF). New homes generally replace houses ranging from 1600 -1800 SF, only a fraction of their expanded size.` Atlanta has once the highest levels of tear downs in the country and much citizen support for regulation. City Council member Mary Norwood has advocated regulation for several years resulting in a Housing Task Force formed in 2004. ATLANTA'S SELF -STUDY PROCESS The City of Atlanta's Infill Housing Task Force worked with the Georgia Tech City and regional Planning Program to measure infill housing scale.2 The goal was to create a database of neighborhood housing characteristics to tailor guidelines to each area. The Study addressed three questions: • Would current zoning regulations control the scale of single family houses? • If not, what methods are available to measures the scale of houses? • Could these measures be used to develop appropriate regulations? In December 2004, Council Member Norwood released the study which concluded that current zoning limitations on height, lot coverage, front and side setbacks and floor to area ratio "were not capturing the concept of scale that was needed in examining infill residential construction," according to the report. REGULATION THROUGH THE "WEIGHTED FACEPRINT" The study and task force concluded than none of the current measurements were appropriate for shaping and respecting neighborhood scale. The study proposed a new concept called the "weighted faceprint," which has two components: "Faceprint" and "observed building height." "Faceprint" is the percentage of a photo frame taken from the curb farthest from the house that is occupied by the facade. The same base photo is used to determine observed height. The composite rating must be compared with the weighted faceprint of neighboring houses for an accurate sense of scale appropriateness. 15 POLITICAL CONTROVERSY The prospect of house size regulation in Atlanta and Dekalb County has spurned heated debate over property rights and government intrusion. Citizens and real estate groups opposed to new regulations questioned the validity and reliability of the Georgia Institute of Technology Study and the methodology of the "Weighted Faceprint" given varying camera types. Citizens have argued that the method is subjective and discourages change in even neighborhoods of 1000 SF ramblers that do not meet contemporary needs. Citizen arguments in favor of property rights and continued unregulated tear downs in Atlanta include: • New infill housing capitalizes on existing infrastructure and often improves it without the use of public funds • Infill increases property values and tax revenues • Infill reduces land consumption on the fringe • It brings people and jobs closer together and reduces traffic pollution • It revitalizes depressed areas In January 2006, Atlanta mayor Shirley Franklin issued a temporary building ban on large new houses. She called for the city to address the infill issue by rewriting city zoning codes that have not been updated since 1982. After the city council defeated the highly - controversial moratorium in mid - February, a new task force of real estate experts is crafting legislation that would prevent construction of out -of scale homes in existing neighborhoods. The task force will include engineers, real estate lawyers, developers, residents, some city's planners and lawyers and others who are vested in the issue HAY�100BBS 16 ATLANTA AND DEKALB COUNTY, GEORGIA DEKALB COUNTY 2006 SPECIAL ZONING OVERLAY DISTRICT In February 2006, response to significant pressure on older neighborhoods, the Dekalb County, Georgia commissioners approved a zoning code that allows neighborhoods to seek special overlay district. At least 55% of residents in a defined geographic area must sign a petition to request the overlay. The overlay districts will be regulated by a two -point code that forbids new houses higher than 28 feet from the front threshold to the highest roof peak. Also prohibited is raising the threshold more than two feet higher than that of the previous house. The overlay district approach is a compromise between no regulation and a proposed countywide infill ordinance that would have limited new houses in existing neighborhoods to a size not much larger than the houses they replace. (Endnotes) I 'Fitting into intown: Incompatible infills anger neighborhoods; by David Pandered, Atlanta Journal - Constitution, June 20, 2005. 2 'Measuring the Scale of infill Residential Properties,* Georgia Institute of Technology, December 2004. 17 HAY OOan Boulder County f , ! � 1 T •1J larc. t t � 4�r. • � ,. h ri t i rr y ' - -Ti c`1 .q � `S J. �` nra !M' � ai�� � 1„r L •} f♦ 3 �v I ilif 4 `k e �- • � I _ ? � Ru.,, . r. �t..r.� "... r � L� de rl R' -µzyd � n � � [ � _ � On�er�l id•s Z r . • t X 1 Jar '*Ai r b �` L -. s� - i'�t�i g �` 1 r.:�. Ero - .. - { h4 l 1 Y #. a `I`'Y 'i i if+ t 1• riz.y.+is Y i G 1-a ! :..:: ,.,,. { !" u - F,^ �f yM1 �� f 1 1 J 5't }'J "- � � S � y �' �4A k9 �•� Iiw� �� ... « _ S I J J u�1i if ... Y Yi..7 m �.izaw >j i�gcwa �fU, YF s xcf- , -'.,. .s,,....yv 1�� :WwnSHd.' "'M•'G :,� y * _. r � ti 1 . nr. � . Regulation Type: Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District Regulations . j Criteria for, Selection: Neighborhood initiated-(minimum 15 homes) Nomination & Approval: Nomination of the district require signature from a minimum of 50% of the proposed district residents Approval requires 60% or residents signature Activities Regulated: Regulation requires review and Adoption by the Boulder County Land Use Department Managed By: County of Boulder after Adoption Approved: June 2002 HAY 008BS 18 BACKGROUND In Boulder Colorado, McMansions were originally associated with the development boom and resulting issues of sprawl. However, with the decline of the first ring suburbs and old neighborhoods within the limits of the city, the issue of tear down construction and infill housing became one and the same. The Land Use Department has received numerous requests to limit the height or footprint of new development throughout the county, each with a specific set of issues and criteria associated with it. As a result, the question was how the city would control this type of development without infringing upon the rights or desires within individual neighborhoods. OVERLAY DISTRICTS Rather than rely upon the creation of one set of complex rules that applied to the entire City, the County Land Use Department determined that Overlay Districts would prove to be a much more efficient use of time and resources. Overlay regulations are used, when applicable, in conjunction with the Site Plan Review currently used by the Land Use Department in order to review projects. The Site Plan Review does consider the compatibility of any future development within the neighborhood, but the Overlay District Regulations provide additional governance regarding the construction provided that they are not in conflict or supersede the zoning codes regulated by the county. The goal of the Neighborhood Overlay District is to create a set of guidelines that reduce the number of conflicts that arise with exiting and new development. At the same time it is managed in such a way that it also tries to lessen the impact that this additional regulation would have on the County review process. LOCAL CONTROL The unique aspect of the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay Districts in Boulder County is that they are not controlled by the County. Instead of creating another level of bureaucracy in defining districts or neighborhoods, the County has created • set of guidelines that members of the community may use in order to establish • Conservation District. This is submitted for review and adoption to the County Land Use Department. This proposal process is structured by the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District Regulations, a document prepared by the County in order to ensure that each Overlay District organization understand the purpose and requirements in order to create the District. 19 HAY DOBBS THE PURPOSES OF OVERLAYS As a document that is designed to assist in the regulation of a range of development types, the Overlay Regulations, a general set of provisions were established as follows. • To preserve and protect the character or valued features of established Neighborhoods • To recognize the diversity of Issues and character in Individual neighborhoods In the unincorporated parts of Boulder County. • To reduce conflicts between new construction and existing development in established neighborhoods. • To provide knowledge and reliance about the parameters of neighborhood character. • To allow neighborhoods to work together with the County to formulate a plan that defines their community of common interest and that fosters a defined community character consistent with County zoning, the Land Use Code, and the Comprehensive Plan. • To complement the County's Site Plan Review process in neighborhoods that have defined their community character pursuant to these regulations. These purposes are further defined by the creation of a map delineating a Neighborhood Conservation District, in which all future development shall be required to comply with the adopted regulations. However, it is important to note that the guidelines set forth by the Overlay District do not replace zoning codes already in place. Nor shall they apply existing structures, making them compliant or noncompliant, based on the wording of the Overlay. Finally, all Overlay districts must be in compliance with the County Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Code. HAY OOBBS 20 BOULDER COUNTY, COLORADO BOTTOM -UP DESIGNATION The creation of an Overlay District must be initiated by members of the community, and in no instances may the County Board of Commissioners or the Planning Commission initiate the creation of an Overlay District. In order to create a District, the following requirements must be met for Adoption by the County: • Shall Include a minimum of 15 adjacent privately -owned parcels, unless the area proposed Is an extension of the boundaries of an approved Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District. • Shall Include privately -owned parcels that are closely settled and of similar size, and which are associated by common characteristics of geography, development, services, and Interests. • Should consider other adjacent privately -owned parcels having shared distinguishing characteristics that could be found to comprise a logical neighborhood unit, when determining the boundaries of a Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District. • Shall exempt privately -owned parcels of five acres or greater, unless the owner of the parcel agrees to inclusion of that parcel into the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District. The establishment of defined district requires signatures from a minimum of 50 percent of the property owners within the delineated area. In the application for the Overlay District, a statement of purpose explaining the intent of the District with a description of the neighborhood and the valued features is required. Also required is a description of land use within the proposed area and history describing the evolution of the history. Finally, a list of homeowner associations or other parties interested in the potential Overlay District must be included in to be considered for adoption. Once this information has been compiled for processing, the proposed Overlay district will go through a series of public meeting reviews prior to final submission to the County for review and adoption. Signed approval of 60 percent of the residents of the district is required for this to occur. Subsequently, the County shall review the proposed Overlay District, evaluating the similar character of the land use types and sizes, and compliancy with Land Use code. 21 HA ., i Regulation. Type:, e,, r �{r.. �b I;Zll _ n 1. r4 n � , . '... 4 � r . sir -.:°� ¢`` ;.,, a%- ^''I:. .,ti 17 .. • c�k�j'�"s Neighborhood Conservation Districts Criteria for'Selection: (see Designation Criteria below) No and Approval: SI % landowner signatures Activities Regulated: materials, garage entrance massing, lot coverage, orientation, hardscape, roof line and pitch, site planning, floor area ratio, style, Managed By: Town Manager Approved: January 2003 BACKGROUND In January 2003, the Town of Chapel Hill adopted a Land Use Management Ordinance that includes provision for the creation of Neighborhood Conservation Districts (NCD). Since that time, five neighborhoods have enrolled or are undergoing the enrollment process. An application by at least 51% of the land/ property owners within a defined district is needed to begin the process. The Town of Chapel Hill Website contains the following information on NCD's in the city: Purpose Statement Within the Town of Chapel Hill there are unique and distinctive older in -town residential neighborhoods, or commercial districts, which contribute significantly to the overall character and identity of the Town and are worthy of preservation and protection. Some of these districts are designated as historic districts, others may lack sufficient historical, architectural or cultural significance at the present time to be designated as Historic Districts. As a matter of public policy, the Town Council aims to preserve, protect, enhance, and perpetuate the value of these residential neighborhoods or commercial districts through the establishment of Neighborhood Conservation Districts. Purpose The purposes of a Neighborhood Conservation District in older Town residential neighborhoods or commercial districts are as follows: • to promote and provide for economic revitalization and/or enhancement • to protect and strengthen desirable and unique physical features, design characteristics, and recognized identity, charm and flavor; • to protect and enhance the livability of the Town; • to reduce conflict and prevent blighting caused by incompatible and insensitive development, and to promote new compatible development, • to stabilize property values; • to provide residents and property owners with a planning bargaining tool for future development; • to promote and retain affordable housing; • to encourage and strengthen civic pride; and to encourage the harmonious, orderly and efficient growth and redevelopment of the Town. 2 3 HAY 00 8S DESIGNATION CRITERIA To be designated a Neighborhood Conservation District, the area must meet the following criteria: The area must contain a minimum of one block face (all the lots on one side of a block); 2. The area must have been platted or developed at least 25 years ago; 3. At least 75 0k of the land area in the proposed district is presently improved; and 4. The area must possess one or more of the following distinctive features that create a cohesive identifiable setting, character or association; a. scale, size, type of construction, or distinctive building materials; b. lot layouts, setbacks, street layouts, alleys or sidewalks; C. special natural or streetscape characteristics, such as creek beds, parks, ' gardens or street landscaping; d. land use patterns, including mixed or unique uses or activities; or e. abuts or links designated historic landmarks and /or districts. 5. The area must be predominantly residential in use and character. 6. Any designated Historic Overlay District shall be deemed to satisfy the criteria listed above. ZONING AUTHORITY Separate ordinances are required to designate each district. Ordinances designating each Neighborhood Conservation District shall identify the designated district boundaries, and specify the individual purposes and standards for that district. 1. Overlay District - Neighborhood Conservation Districts are designed as overlays to the regular zoning districts. Property designated within these districts must also be designated as being within one of the General Use Districts. Authorized uses must be permitted in both the General Use District and the overlay district. Property designated as a Neighborhood Conservation District may have additional designations. Such property shall comply with all applicable use restrictions. HAY 00885 24 CHAPEL HILL, NORTH CAROLINA 2. Zoning Designation a. The zoning designation for property located within a Neighborhood Conservation District shall consist of the base zone symbol and the overlay district symbol (CD) as a suffix. Neighborhood Conservation Districts shall be numbered sequentially to distinguish among different districts, i.e., R -4 (CD -1), R -1 (CD -2), etc. b. The designation of property within a Neighborhood Conservation District places such property in a new zoning district classification and all procedures and requirements for zoning /rezoning must be followed. c. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of a specific Neighborhood Conservation District ordinance and the General Use District regulations, the provisions of the Neighborhood Conservation District ordinance shall control. d. Except as modified by this Section, the procedures for zoning changes set forth in Section 4.4 shall otherwise apply to the designation of an area as a Neighborhood Conservation District. e. Upon designation of an area as a Neighborhood Conservation District, the Town Council shall cause notice of such designation to be recorded in the official public records of real property of Orange County. Application Procedures 1. proposal for designation as a Neighborhood Conservation District may be initiated: a. at the direction of Town Council, or b. at the request of owners representing 51% of the land area within the proposed district, or c. at the request of 51% of property owners in a proposed district. 2. Following initiation for designation of a Neighborhood Conservation District, the Planning Board shall develop a neighborhood conservation plan for the proposed district that includes: a. maps indicating the boundaries; age of structures and land use of the proposed district; 25 HAY OOBBS b. maps and other graphic and written materials identifying and describing the distinctive neighborhood and building characteristics of the proposed district; and c. design standards for new construction, additions or alterations to the street facades of existing buildings or structures within the proposed district. 3. All property owners within the proposed district shall be afforded the opportunity to participate in drafting the conservation plan. A conservation plan shall be approved as part of a Zoning Atlas Amendment creating a Neighborhood Conservation District. DESIGN STANDARDS 1. The conservation plan approved as part of the zoning ordinance creating a Neighborhood Conservation District shall include design standards for new construction or placement of any building, structure, foundation, sign, public art or outdoor apparatus or equipment (including visible utility boxes or mechanical equipment; trucks; lawn or landscaping equipment, but not including lawnmowers or hand tools; playground equipment; or sports equipment), and any additions, alterations, relocation or rehabilitation to the street facades of existing buildings, structures, foundations, sign, public art, or outdoor apparatus or equipment. 2. The conservation plan, and requisite design standards shall not apply to those activities which constitute ordinary repair and maintenance, i.e., using the same material and design. 3. The Design Standards for the Neighborhood Conservation District shall include the minimum following elements governing the physical characteristics and features of all property (public or private) within the proposed district: a. building height, number of stories; b. building size, massing (frontage, entrance location /features); c. lot size, coverage; d. front and side yard setbacks; e. off - street parking and loading requirements; HAY OOBBS 26 CHAPEL HILL, NORTH CAROLINA f. roof line and pitch; g. paving, hardscape covering. In addition, the Design Standards may include, but shall not be limited to, the following elements: a. building orientation; b. general site planning (primary, ancillary structures); c. density; d. floor area ratio; e. signage; f. architectural style and details; g. building materials; h. garage entrance location; i. front window, dormer size and location; j. landscaping; k. fences and walls; 1. entrance lighting; m. driveways and sidewalks; n. satellite dishes, utility boxes; o. street furniture; p. public art; q. demolition (see subsection E). 27 HAY OOBBS ADMINISTRATION OF ORDINANCE 1. No building permit shall be issued for new construction or an alteration or addition to the street facade of an existing building or structure within a designated Neighborhood Conservation District without the submission and approval of design plans and the issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit by the Town Manager. 2. The Town Manager shall review the design plans to determine compliance with the design standards contained in the neighborhood conservation plan adopted for the district. 3. If the Town Manager determines that the design plans are in conformance with the design standards adopted for the district, the Town Manager shall approve the plans and issue a Zoning Compliance Permit and the Department of Building Inspections may issue a building permit. 4. If the Town Manager determines that the design plans are not in conformance with the design standards adopted for the district, the Town Manager shall not approve the plans, and will issue Notification of Non - Compliance, identifying the specific Design Standards violated. 5. The applicant may appeal the Town Manager's determination to the Board of Adjustment for a final determination. S HAY 1008S 2 8 $ 29 HAY OOBBS Evanston, Illinois , tt,� 4w 9 ?.t_kC3t"t�yl� tS �� ��.�r�'`ti e„a..,.. Na", RE �,}"�� �( x'`�',5::.3.Ztt x,18 �,yF•i..t�s.��.:3 "+ -a�'ti -a C�}. 7 �r ,• i Qh�tiM {' �tT! t yiC?�{°v3 ��taai, s Y�.i��v e✓ i.+w.a� -,.:+ T{i L` M, � •��j; . Regulation Type: Criteria for Selection: Nomination and Approval.• Activities Regulated: Managed By-* Approved: Part of zoning code NA NA, Height, lot percentage, and garage regulation City planning'o ff ce NA BACKGROUND Like Edina, Evanston is a first -ring residential suburb just north of Chicago. Developed along Lake Michigan and commuter rail lines, Evanston focuses on a historic downtown and nearby Northwestern University. Numerous historic neighborhoods, especially near the lake and University have faced significant pressure for larger houses. In 2003, led by Alderman Eb Moran, the Zoning Committee of the City's Plan Commission worked to develop a Sixth Ward Conservation District to fill gaps in the existing zoning ordinance to control large tear downs and renovations. REGULATIONS OF THE PROPOSED NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION DISTRICT In a guest essay for The Round Table of Evanston, Alderman Moran wrote that in the last five years, the city's Sixth Ward had seen a steady rise in new houses that are much larger than the homes they replaced. In November, the Committee voted unanimously to create a Neighborhood Conservation District that regulated the following: 1. The maximum height of a house will be measured from street level rather than from the top of the basement, often four feet above street level; 2. The height of rebuilds could exceed the height of their predecessors. However, the height could not exceed a 20 percent increase In the average height of its four neighboring houses. Thus, neighborhoods need not be static. Change, however, would be evolutionary - not overwhelming; 3. The side yard setbacks for rebuilds would have to be at least 15 percent of the lot width but, in any event, no less than five feet on each side; 4. The impervious surface of the entire lot could not exceed 45 percent; 5. 50 percent of the area of a front porch would be exempt from lot coverage and impervious surface limitations. The regulations proved controversial. In February 2004, the Evanston City Council voted not to consider the conservation overlay district in the Sixth Ward. The case of Evanston is, as far as the research of this study has found, the only occasion in which a city council has rejected a task force or planning commission proposed neighborhood conservation district. 31 HAY OOBBS LIMITED REGULATIONS AS PART OF ZONING CODE Instead, the Council adopted a few of the Plan Commission's recommendations as part of the zoning code including: • a formula for height limitation that includes a measurement from grade level rather than first floor • a limit on percent of a lot that can be covered by Impervious surfaces • the prohibition of garages with street access, If there is an alley behind the house. The Round Table of Evanston editorialized the following week: "... the City Council took the path of least resistance, adopting a piecemeal solution, adding a few more patches to a Zoning ordinance that still does not fully address the problem of single family home infill development that is out of scale and Dine with the harmony of the neighborhood... Left unattended is the problem of side yard setbacks. A 40-foot -tall house may still be built seven feet away from a modest, older home, if that home it only two feet away from the lot fine because it it a legal non - conforming use. Left unattended is the issue of dwarfing and shadowing. A 40-fool-fall house may still be erected next to an 19-foot-tall ranch house." The editorial went on to recommend using a different tool — "the resurrection of floor area ratios, which would tie the size of a house to the size of the lot, in the City's Zoning Ordinance." Since that time, the City's zoning ordinance was supplemented with a "porch allowance" that permits a builder to increase impermeable surfaces if he or she could build a house with a front porch. r1 second change was a clearer definition of a "remodel" and a "renovation" in the code to prevent projects from being grandfathered in that are essentially an entirely new, and larger house, built on an existing structure. (Endnotes) 1. Evanston Round Table, Feb. 11, 2004 HAY 0088S 32 EVNSTON, ILLINOIS 33 HAY OOBBS L_,�t tM � t ; � ... 1 4. T'n �- '.,.�. .sl t 'y� �.�•, Y {.Y J5dis1•i�''3,,� ei �"�� -i E �'� : L � v �S�F T t� -��� . _ �' �i E � •ri t \ r rs?� .ti lJi4•s 4 i"��} 'c3rcii 4'-a, � I...it rt t�;.;r�,�� .1 J- �cy..3 � � , . 1 t-., �-�,-,' '�^y �-v3� -/!< TaM,..i y •-a1 s f t it Y 'j] j E =7 ,� tF �1 t� E °s •er•� U, F 4�,�. -.t �S ``'t r -'•r 1'� nrr j�' # 1a ri. ` F!Pat n t{ - or!""°` i ,'t '+ir.• ,t 1 1 ; fi E � t lu.� e s � } +� �jl� �13 � [ z.�t� z"-v e- .uri+r �i �:�i� Y'la��.��,�,�� 3i E. k �:.. �- i ,ti'Lx z ►jai. %: ,f .u�t 15s'°'�- 17 Rr-'.T�3r ��f F' }eo. �''$_�+ E'i•7 `- `'E F i�T� Y7�'Or' .- °�+ •. E �-,p. .,,,dR y.n, �! s +civaP"rr � ri �. 1� V1.a 7t�, R �'�t '�7 mow:,, • Pmo�- t ywCrip)tir� ' qua' 117. � � tcF_, -tL�i ,r' '"� t - 'l �+• "�° 'rhr� ` '4 N i : ` ', ."'rl.� Cy.n �-;�•� L-�. 1jj ir'x ! xs tt1 E... 1� t s., cr-1' ✓ t� �'�*t- i ai C�Yz7'�k +k"SE i fi E +e � � o:•�"r `�� 1 ate.,. ��rd 1 � FCsa t i�• � • II'� ° i �I i i� �,i11� s- � •} ti rfi .,r r.¢m -� , r LQM•MI�.." V {"' 1 I I ( �1♦�1.., iL T if () 'e-1 ( ' , n ie„ p".�� i i y1' ,{i.� � 1 y- '�4t. e°ii` �+f �'�" rt ��, . . .1 ! h," A r :{r � C�•c- •i. fi' *• 3 (l r:.,.,. yy�- G3�",r•' ( t .i. 511 4' .L3•lut M awl_ �cqt" t l Iun�i � t. !Its °:-•- '�• . ] 1 �'F 9 'i•.. Eta l 1! �- "t '7. ' n I 1, r i e •(� i. I F a �-�', row y� , 7 �.o% i��G :! k� a � �� Y �-+ ,�•� � e�•� .. kri�•7y j,� r.�� t -� :'1, ('` r"-n X I . � � �,ix f, s'$ ti;^a! i�'•�'� �� _ �.�:'� �.0 '�-Z � 4 � a � � +?� r� E<;..�•i I .1k1 '-�' �...�+.��� �, a ac� c w t� i t E r� e i —, JJ 1 t _. a4y t�.a.1'Ht'� xes� " �r [9 I. L'�t Pri ��� �.:�;J- Regulation Type: Zoning Ordinance Criteria for Selection: Tear down construction was'defined as construction or remodeling of single - family and certain two family residences to at or nearahe maximum allowable size" under the zoning ordinance in neighborhoods characteristically contdining substantially smaller homes.. Nomination'and Approval.• Approval is awarded based on compliance to the revised Zoning Ordinance Activities Regulated: Zoning Districts R -I, R -2, R -3 and R -4 Single Family Districts Managed By: Village of Oak Park Approved: January 2003 34 HAY 008 B$ . t - L_,�t tM � t ; � ... 1 4. T'n �- '.,.�. .sl t 'y� �.�•, Y {.Y J5dis1•i�''3,,� ei �"�� -i E �'� : L � v �S�F T t� -��� . _ �' �i E � •ri t \ r rs?� .ti lJi4•s 4 i"��} 'c3rcii 4'-a, � I...it rt t�;.;r�,�� .1 J- �cy..3 � � , . 1 t-., �-�,-,' '�^y �-v3� -/!< TaM,..i y •-a1 s f t it Y 'j] j E =7 ,� tF �1 t� E °s •er•� U, F 4�,�. -.t �S ``'t r -'•r 1'� nrr j�' # 1a ri. ` F!Pat n t{ - or!""°` i ,'t '+ir.• ,t 1 1 ; fi E � t lu.� e s � } +� �jl� �13 � [ z.�t� z"-v e- .uri+r �i �:�i� Y'la��.��,�,�� 3i E. k �:.. �- i ,ti'Lx z ►jai. %: ,f .u�t 15s'°'�- 17 Rr-'.T�3r ��f F' }eo. �''$_�+ E'i•7 `- `'E F i�T� Y7�'Or' .- °�+ •. E �-,p. .,,,dR y.n, �! s +civaP"rr � ri �. 1� V1.a 7t�, R �'�t '�7 mow:,, • Pmo�- t ywCrip)tir� ' qua' 117. � � tcF_, -tL�i ,r' '"� t - 'l �+• "�° 'rhr� ` '4 N i : ` ', ."'rl.� Cy.n �-;�•� L-�. 1jj ir'x ! xs tt1 E... 1� t s., cr-1' ✓ t� �'�*t- i ai C�Yz7'�k +k"SE i fi E +e � � o:•�"r `�� 1 ate.,. ��rd 1 � FCsa t i�• � • II'� ° i �I i i� �,i11� s- � •} ti rfi .,r r.¢m -� , r LQM•MI�.." V {"' 1 I I ( �1♦�1.., iL T if () 'e-1 ( ' , n ie„ p".�� i i y1' ,{i.� � 1 y- '�4t. e°ii` �+f �'�" rt ��, . . .1 ! h," A r :{r � C�•c- •i. fi' *• 3 (l r:.,.,. yy�- G3�",r•' ( t .i. 511 4' .L3•lut M awl_ �cqt" t l Iun�i � t. !Its °:-•- '�• . ] 1 �'F 9 'i•.. Eta l 1! �- "t '7. ' n I 1, r i e •(� i. I F a �-�', row y� , 7 �.o% i��G :! k� a � �� Y �-+ ,�•� � e�•� .. kri�•7y j,� r.�� t -� :'1, ('` r"-n X I . � � �,ix f, s'$ ti;^a! i�'•�'� �� _ �.�:'� �.0 '�-Z � 4 � a � � +?� r� E<;..�•i I .1k1 '-�' �...�+.��� �, a ac� c w t� i t E r� e i —, JJ 1 t _. a4y t�.a.1'Ht'� xes� " �r [9 I. L'�t Pri ��� �.:�;J- Regulation Type: Zoning Ordinance Criteria for Selection: Tear down construction was'defined as construction or remodeling of single - family and certain two family residences to at or nearahe maximum allowable size" under the zoning ordinance in neighborhoods characteristically contdining substantially smaller homes.. Nomination'and Approval.• Approval is awarded based on compliance to the revised Zoning Ordinance Activities Regulated: Zoning Districts R -I, R -2, R -3 and R -4 Single Family Districts Managed By: Village of Oak Park Approved: January 2003 34 HAY 008 B$ . BACKGROUND The population of the community is approximately 52,000 people with a median age of 36. More significant is the diversity within the community with a non -white component of thirty percent. The city claims this that it has one of the most diverse ranges of ethnicity, race and culture in the region. A goal of the community is to maintain this range of diversity and providing persons from the City of Chicago with a means to purchase homes in the suburbs. These goals were effectively identified in the housing objective of the 1990 Comprehensive Plan, which are as follows: -To support racial integration throughout Oak Park and prevent resegregation in any part of the village. -To support an economically diverse housing stock for all income and age groups living or working in Oak Park. -To enhance and maintain the quality of housing stock for all income and age groups living or working in Oak Park. -To maintain and enhance the residential character of existing residential areas *To preserve and maintain structures bf historical or architectural value and their immediate environment. -To stabilize the size of Oak Park's population. Is has been the concern of the community the trend in tear down construction would be contrary to the goals set forth in the plan, creating a community that did not reflect their identity with in the greater Chicago region. In September of 2002, a present a draft ordinance in regarding the tear down phenomenon was presented for public review. It was acknowledged in the proposal that property values were going to continue to increase, but the concern was that tear down construction was going to create a situation in which property values would raise at a rate that would transform Oak Park into an exclusive community. Tear down construction was defined as construction or remodeling of single- family and certain two family residences to "at or near the maximum allowable size" under the zoning ordinance in neighborhoods characteristically containing substantially smaller homes. 35 HAY OOBBS THE COMMISSION REPORT Recognizing the potential for problems relative to future tear down construction, the Village board directed the Plan Commission to hold a series of public meetings in order to study the issue relative to the concerns of the community members. Based on the community input, research and site visits, and case studies the Commission made recommendations to the Village board. It was proposed that changes be made to the zoning ordinance regarding the following residential types: R -1: Single Family District R -2: Single Family District R -3: Single Family District R -4: Single Family District For each district type, the general description placed emphasis on the preservation and protection of the physical qualities of the within the respective neighborhoods. This goal was supported through the revised Zoning regulations, presumably designed to lessen the impact of tear down construction. These regulations were structured around the use of set backs in order to maintain a consistent appearance on the street. In the case of the front street, setback was determined first by a minimum number off the property line, with the added requirement that it be within the average setback around the house. The average setback was determined by the following formula: a. The average front setback is equal to one half of the following sum: the Average Adjacent Front Setback (as hereinafter defined) plus the Average Non - Adjacent Front Setback (as hereinafter defined). (1) The Average Adjacent Front Setback is the average front setback of the buildings or structures on the lots immediately adjoining the subject lot, weighted in accordance with HAY OOBM 3 6 VILLAGE OF OAK PARK, ILLINOIS the width of each such lot. (2) The Average Non - Adjacent Front Setback is the average front setback of the buildings or structures on all of the non - adjacent lots that are in the same or more - restrictive district, in the same block and on the same side of the street as the subject lot, weighted in accordance with the width of such lot. b. For averaging purposes, vacant lots shall be treated as having the minimum required setback of 30 feet. When the subject lot is a corner lot, the side street shall be treated as a lot having the minimum required setback of 30 feet. Side yards were determined by a using a fixed dimension or a percentage of the lot depth, whichever number was the lesser. Side yards were defined as minimum distances setback from the property line. Building heights were also defined as a set maximum height, although exceptions were described for use types that were not residential. Because this formula was applied to four different zoning types, they were used relative to a base dimension appropriate to the zoning district. As an example, in R -1 and R -2 districts the front yard was required to be set back a minimum of 30 feet whereas the require set back in districts R -3 and R -4 require a set back of only 20 feet. Based on the recommendations the zoning ordinances for R -1 through R -4 were revised in January of 2003. However, the Commission did stress the continued observation would be required in order to determine if this first round of changes would be appropriate for use as a means to regulate tear down construction. 17 HAY OOBMW HAJ 38 E J �d i c %r�'�,.�ira, 2, ... � nc JYM Regulation Type: None at this time. Topic presently under review Criteria for Selection: NA Nomination and Approval.• NA Activities Regulated: NA Managed By: NA Approved.- NA _ �, 39 HAY C)O M' BACKGROUND Rockville and the surrounding Montgomery County is a densely populated suburb of Washington D.C. While the phenomenon of constructing large houses was not new to the area it was previously limited to areas of development with strict development guidelines and review processes. With continued growth and development of the city and county, this construction trend has increasingly spilled over into neighborhoods where the houses have smaller footprints and lower roof heights. WHITEPAPER STUDY The City has taken the process of updating zoning ordinances in order to respond to current needs and concerns. Among these concerns is mansionization and how it has started to impact the City. As a construction trend, mansionization was not something that was new in the City or the surrounding Montgomery County, let alone the entire region surrounding Washington, D.C. Typically, it was managed through neighborhood covenants and architectural reviews. However, it has become an issue of increasing concern as the city is continued to be developed. The Study addressed four concerns: • Property Value • Infrastructure • Environment • Compatibility SPRAWL AND PROPERTY VALUE At the heart of the all the concerns regarding mansionziantion are the issues of sprawl, development and property values. Rockville continues to develop as a community, but is rapidly becoming built -out, rapidly decreasing the number of lots available. Residential development opportunities were also limited by the increase of development of property in the county adjacent to the city limits. This has resulted in tear down residential development that is increasingly evident within the limits of the city, but not restricted by any of the residential covenants used in other neighborhoods. While the pattern of re- development is not entirely clear, preference is given to areas close to mass transit, location relative to the central core and the amount of land attached to the property that was purchased. �� 40 ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND Current residents of the more desirable neighborhoods are concerned that the value of their homes will be limited by tear down development. They are also concerned that the sudden change in property values may change the demographic character of the neighborhood, making the homes less affordable to middle -class home buyers. Some residents are concerned that the increase property values may result in increased taxes while other feel their property values may decrease relative to the new homes. The city recognizes these concerns, but also is faced with the demands of a highly competitive housing market within the county and Washington D.C. region. Rapid transformation of the neighborhood character could place a burden on the current residents in the form of taxes. On the other side of this issue is the concern that a lack of development within a community could generate stagnant market conditions, resulting in decreased property values. This was compounded with the fact that housing stock must be repaired or replaced as it becomes inadequate for use. While renovation is a an option, it had become economically more sensible to tear down the existing residence in many case. Hence the charge of the white paper was to describe a number of options that could be used in order to regulate mansionaization, while allowing for development to occur without the use of covenants or other elaborate forms of regulation. REGULATION ALTERNATIVES Within the white paper, five methods of regulating mass were described in addition to a brief discussion of architectural requirements. The five methods of regulating mass were as follows: • Building Envelope Regulations • Floor Area Ratios • Cubic Content Ratios • Second Story regulation • Daylight Plane Regulation Building envelope regulations were described as the traditional means of regulating building construction through the use of defined setbacks on a sliding scale. This is traditionally defined in terms of the footprint occupying a percentage of the lot. This is used with a defined height limit in order to determine the cubic volume of the residence. Presently, the footprint a house may occupy on a lot in Rockville ranges from 25 to 35 percent. Of significance is the manner in which the building height is measured. The maximum height of a house is 35 feet, measured from 41 HAY OOBBS the mid -point on a gabled roof. Depending on the slope of the gable, this means of measurement may allow for what appears to be an additional floor within the house. This may create a significant difference in visual appearance relative to home neighboring this house. FLOOR AREA RATIOS Floor Area Ratios are typically used to regulate commercial development or multiple residences, units such as apartment buildings. In Rockville, they are typically used in situations where setbacks were not an issue. The paper does note that FAR regulations does not allow for regulations regarding the height of a building, as it defines only the gross area of a house. Hence, a height restriction would still be required in order ensure that the bulk of a new house does not impede of the exiting neighboring structures. In addition to this, the setback regulations would also be required, as this is not regulated by FAR regulations. Cubic content ratios operate in a similar manner and face the same regulatory hurdles as Floor Area Ratios. SECOND STORY REGULATIONS Second Story Regulation involves control of the allowable square footage of a second floor on a house in conjunction with defined setbacks in order to diminish the bulk and visual impact of new construction. Defined as a percentage of the footprint and additional fixed setbacks, this form of regulation is a stepped appearance in the house. However, this form of regulation best suites new construction as exiting homes that are renovated with a second floor may not have load bearing points that correspond with the setback prescribed by regulations. DAYLIGHT PLANE REGULATION Day Light Plane Regulation is the most difficult of all five methods to regulate. In this method, the maximum height of a house is defined by projecting imaginary planes through the lot from a defined height at the side property lines. The imaginary planes define the maximum height of the house at any given location on the lot. However, there may be exemptions such as towers and dormers, and sloping topography on the site exaggerates the maximum height through the site. In addition, as the heights are determined by the lot area, they require additional review for each project. Finally, the Daylight Plane only serves as a supplement to regulation regarding setbacks and footprint areas. IMPLEMENTATION An equally difficult task to the means of regulation is the means of implementation. The methods of implementation discusses were Additional Neighborhood Review, Overlay Districts and New Permitting Definitions. The Neighborhood Review 42 THE DAYLIGHT PLANE CAM SECTM OF THE GAYLtGHT PLANE SDE PROPERTY LWE ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND would require that the proposed construction go through additional review procedures in order to gain approval. One example requires that the house builders gain the approval of the property owners on the adjacent lots after construction exceeded a certain limit. DEFINING HISTORIC AND CONSERVATION OVERLAY DISTRICTS Overlay Districts were separated into two subcategories, Historic districts and Conservation Overlay Districts. In each case specific polices and requirements are written in order to protect and retain the visual quality of the existing neighborhood. In the case of Historic Overlay Districts, attention may be placed on material selection and color. More significantly, development is subject to review by a board or commission in order to gain approval for construction. Conservation Overlay Districts lack this final review and approval process. Research into the architectural history and character of the specific overlay district is required in order to create a set of regulation that regulates future development in a manner that reflects the neighboring buildings. The creation of new definitions involves changing definition of the terms "demolition" and "substantial alteration' in order to discourage tear down construction. This would also involve alteration of review procedures within the City or Rockville. Based on the review, the following recommendations were made in the white paper • Limit mansionization regulation to the smallest three lot zones. The remaining residential lot types were thought to be adequate to absorb any large residential development without any adverse impact on the adjacent properties. • Modify and add definitions for demolition and substantial alteration. The current definitions are too lenient, as they were not written with the expectation that this construction pattern would occur as a phenomenon, • Establish polices and procedures to create Neighborhood Conservation Districts. This will assist in retaining the architectural character of neighborhoods that are seen as potential areas of redevelopment, while retaining flexibility applicable to each neighborhood. • Additional side yard setbacks after a certain level. The recommended additional setback was 2 feet when the house reached a height beyond 25 feet. 43 HAY OOBBS Chapter III: Methods of Evaluation Case studies of previous zoning ordinances serves as a useful method of exploring means of regulation, but evaluation is limited by the definitions set forth in the each case study. This makes it difficult to evaluate the physical conditions of a specific community relative to the housing stock. In the previous section, a number of approaches were taken according to the respective social agendas. What was not evident in these case studies was the appearance of the historic building fabric. The appearance of the homes, placing the previous zoning ordinances into question, also not evident in these studies. Typically, these houses are described as being "out of scale" or as the odd tooth in a smile. How is it that this is determined? How the bulk of a building is measured relative to the street and the neighboring properties should be examined as part of this process. Hay Dobbs has executed a secondary research exercise examining three means of identifying or measuring the bulk of a residence. The Methods of evaluation are as follows: • Faceprint Assessment, the results of a Georgia Tech research project on tear downs • Evaluation Criteria for the National Register, prepared by the National Park Service • Highway Visual Impact Assessment, Prepared by MnDot 44 HAY,DOBBS Face Print Analysis In 2003, Georgia Tech University was contacted regarding the visual impact that the tear down development was having on adjacent properties and neighborhoods. The goal of the project was to address three key questions that were identified by the City of Atlanta's Infill Housing Task Force. The questions that were brought to bear were as follows • Would current zoning regulations control the scale of single - family residential structures? • If not, what methods are available (or could be developed) to measure the scale of residential structures? • Could these measures be used to develop appropriate control mechanisms in parts of Atlanta? The Georgia Tech study took an approach that primarily addressed the second question in an effort to find answers for the other two. The result of their research and study was a photogrammetrical process called "faceprinting." Rather than rely upon more traditional means of measurement, such as measuring the foot print of a building or using established setbacks, their goal was to create a system of measurement that would measure the house's visual impact relative to the street. The first part of the process involves photographing the house from the street. The photographer would face the house in question with their heels placed against the curb on the opposite side of the street. The camera settings are to be set at the widest angle possible in order to get as much of the house in the frame as possible. The resulting image is then used in order to determine the relative size of the house. The image would be imported into any computer application that was capable of measuring polygons, such as cad. This part of the process involves creating an outline of the house in order to measure the area of the house relative to the area of the photograph. The measured area of the house is then divided by the area of the photograph, yielding a percentage. This is then multiplied by the observed building height, yielding a number that is the weighted faceprint. While the study does serve as a means to measure the scale of an object relative to the frame, it does not provide a clear means by which a house may be measured relative to the context that is in. As an example, two houses may have identical faceprint ratios while having drastically different footprints. Secondly, each house is considered as an object within a frame, with no concern as to how it is situated of the property. How a residence is placed within the boundaries of the lot play an important part in their visual impact on the adjacent properties and the neighboring houses. 45 �� 97' \ i i \ f -- — N--- � I � Face Print Analysis In 2003, Georgia Tech University was contacted regarding the visual impact that the tear down development was having on adjacent properties and neighborhoods. The goal of the project was to address three key questions that were identified by the City of Atlanta's Infill Housing Task Force. The questions that were brought to bear were as follows • Would current zoning regulations control the scale of single - family residential structures? • If not, what methods are available (or could be developed) to measure the scale of residential structures? • Could these measures be used to develop appropriate control mechanisms in parts of Atlanta? The Georgia Tech study took an approach that primarily addressed the second question in an effort to find answers for the other two. The result of their research and study was a photogrammetrical process called "faceprinting." Rather than rely upon more traditional means of measurement, such as measuring the foot print of a building or using established setbacks, their goal was to create a system of measurement that would measure the house's visual impact relative to the street. The first part of the process involves photographing the house from the street. The photographer would face the house in question with their heels placed against the curb on the opposite side of the street. The camera settings are to be set at the widest angle possible in order to get as much of the house in the frame as possible. The resulting image is then used in order to determine the relative size of the house. The image would be imported into any computer application that was capable of measuring polygons, such as cad. This part of the process involves creating an outline of the house in order to measure the area of the house relative to the area of the photograph. The measured area of the house is then divided by the area of the photograph, yielding a percentage. This is then multiplied by the observed building height, yielding a number that is the weighted faceprint. While the study does serve as a means to measure the scale of an object relative to the frame, it does not provide a clear means by which a house may be measured relative to the context that is in. As an example, two houses may have identical faceprint ratios while having drastically different footprints. Secondly, each house is considered as an object within a frame, with no concern as to how it is situated of the property. How a residence is placed within the boundaries of the lot play an important part in their visual impact on the adjacent properties and the neighboring houses. 45 �� Technically, there were some parts of this process that are not clear. It is assumed that the camera used will have settings similar to any other camera used to execute the same process. These setting include those of the aperture and the physical position (height) of the camera. Hence, two different cameras could yield drastically different results when measurements of the same house are taken. Granted, the measurements for each set of studies would be consistent, but lens selection could skew the calculations. This would result in lower number, making the house appear smaller based on the measured value of construction. In addition, the measured faceprint does not take the side elevations of the house into account. In a effort to be in compliance within the designated range for a faceprint, a the bulk of a house could be positioned on along the property line. This would result in a house that was compliant, but would still be visually encroaching on the adjacent property. Finally, this appears to be a method of evaluation that is reactionary, using existing out of scale construction as a means to determine the maximum allowable ratio. However, it would be difficult to enforce future construction limitations based on the notion that the house with the highest number exceeds the a number set post construction. �� 46 . "IVk In National Register Requirements Another method of determining could be based on restructuring the guidelines used to designate Historic Suburbs prepared by the U.S. Department of the Interior. Written in 2002, the Bulletin, Historic Residential Suburbs. Guidelines for Evaluation and Documentation for the National Register of Historic Places identifies significant suburban forms in order to preserve their historic fabric for future generations. This Bulletin is of particular relevance to Edina because the community embodies many of the qualities identified that make properties eligible for the National Register. Of particular note is the historic Country Club district, which has a distinct history as a community within Edina. Contemporary construction is still driven by a strict set of covenants and guidelines. While the rest of the community may not have the advantage of covenants as construction guidelines, they are all parts of a rich tapestry of developed landscapes, each with its own unique history and relationship with the surrounding landscape. An advantage over the Faceprint study is that the analysis could occur prior to the construction of any homes that seem out of scale. The resulting guidelines could be used to ensure that future construction be done in such a manner that is not only appropriately scaled, but also is in keeping with the architectural fabric surrounding it. Evaluation involves the following three activities: • Defining historic significance, and assessing the historic integrity of the community. • Intensive building and site inventories of the history and condition of a neighborhood is related to the historic patterns of suburbanization that shaped the locality or metropolitan area where it is located. • Final evaluation to determine whether or not a property meets the National Register criteria for evaluation and is eligible for National Register listing. 47 �� For the purposes of the creating construction guidelines, the second and third point would not be stressed in favor of a more extensive examination of the physical attributes of the community in order to generate construction guidelines. In keeping with the requirements set forth by the Department of the Interior, appropriate means of evaluating the community could be: • Spatial Organization and Land Patterns • Topography • Vegetation • Circulation • Structures, Furnishings and Objects In addition to these points, histories of the developers should be examined, along with an examination regarding the history of how the parcels were developed. This would allow for some flexibility in regulation, recognizing that the community was developed in phases, and not as a single event. While this would have the advantage of allowing for some flexibility in regulation, the adoption the National Register guidelines as a foundation for construction regulation could ultimately prove problematic. The first issue would be the assumption that all the neighborhoods had historic value of some form. If that was not the case, it could be a contentious matter to determine which neighborhoods deserve designation versus those that do not. Granted, evaluation on historical merit could be apparent, but those communities that were not selected for conservation would most likely experience a backlash possibly resulting in an even faster rate of tear down construction. This could possibly be interpreted as a form of redlining in the community. HAY DOBBS 48 Highway Visual Impact Assessment, Prepared by MnDot The final method of evaluation that could be used to identify restrictions could be the Highway Visual Impact Assessment prepared by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. Based on a 1999 visual survey and published in 2001, the Visual Impact Assessment documents the results of three different highway view sheds in the state of Minnesota. In each of the surveys the highway view sheds of urban corridors were selected andused as the basis of examination. In each survey, volunteers were required to ride as a group through the corridor, calling out points of interest, regardless of whether they were deemed attractive or otherwise. In the course of the survey, several key elements were identified as a means to determine the legibility of the surrounding landscape and to identify any unsightly conditions. Individuals would call out to identify points of significance while the other volunteers would note and assess the view on a scale of 1 -5. While these points were assessed by the passengers, MnDOT staff gave the point an identification number and wrote down the mileage to allow for further review and photographs at a later date. In addition to the areas that were identified by the volunteers, a number of locations had been identified by MnDOT for assessment. In these locations, specific elements of the landscape were evaluated as required. The advantage `of this format was that it allowed for a broad range of considerations with relative anonymity. Because the volunteers were required to identify and rate the points on the tour, a more comprehensive assessment of the corridors was compiled. Based on this, MnDOT was able to identify a number of identifiers that were common to the evaluation of the highways. These were as follows: • Maintenance • Planting design • Structural design • Vistas from the highway 49 HAY OOBBS In the case of evaluating tear downs, this process may provide means of determining common aesthetic themes in the built community. A similar process in Edina could involve a tour of the city in order to identify a range of housing conditions in order to determine how residents of the city feel about recent construction trends. This information could be used to create a foundation for a set of guidelines to regulate future development in the city. As a tool, it combines the means of assessment used in the face print study with that of the National Register Requirements. It allows people to visually assess and rank residential construction as a visual exercise, with the ability to compile data for quantification. That being said, it embodies the problems involved with both of the methods as well. The unspoken caveat in the Visual Assessment method is that there is a group of undesirable residences by default. Most likely these will be determined not by a common sense of aesthetics but by the tastes of the individual who have volunteered for the exercise. This could generate dissent among members of the community as their homes would be singled out as being "bad" or in "poor taste." It could also have the potentially undesirable effect of creating additional incentives for tear down construction in areas with smaller homes. HA 5 0 Chapter 1V- Alternate Means of Regulation LIMITATIONS OF CONVENTIONAL ZONING Based on our research, the use of conventional methods of zoning will not be suitable for the regulation of tear down construction patterns as they appear today. Conventional zoning should be considered as a method of regulation that determines the maximum bulk that a residence may have relative to the size of the property, defined by a maximum foot print and defined maximum height or construction. What is not taken into account in this method of assessment is context. While a new residence may be designed and constructed in full compliance with the zoning code, the difference in size may be significant enough to make it "stand out" from the older homes in the neighborhood. Therefore, it seems clear that part of the process of regulating tear down construction would be creating policies or process that takes the neighborhood, or the physical context into account. Any alternate means of regulation should take into account relationships between the builder, community regulation and existing residents in the neighborhood. To that end, there are possibly three different approaches that may be taken in order to establish a process in which the physical qualities of new construction are considered relative to existing physical character of the neighborhood. These are: flex zoning regulations, community education and tax incentives. 1. Flex Zoning Flex zoning is a method of encouraging and regulating growth in dense areas where mixed use types may be effectively combined in a manner not permitted with traditional zoning definitions. It is important to note that typically, this form of regulation is not defined as an overlay district, but is intended to serve as part of a revitalization or redevelopment process. Hence, the goal is to encourage growth and development with areas that are traditionally commercial and residential in nature. In these cases, bulk is not regulated by building height, but is examined on a case by case basis, with emphasis placed on the effective combination of use types. Commonly associated with principles of smart growth, Flex zoning serves as a means to create efficient urban environments while preserving undeveloped land for future use. In the context of saturated building environments, it creates an opportunity to make new districts based on the exiting urban fabric. Relative to the process of regulating residential construction, flex zoning can create opportunities '' HAY DOWWM in communities that encourages the continuous evaluation of residential renovation and construction in order to maintain or encourage growth. As a principle of smart growth, it is recommended that flex zoning be used as part of a comprehensive set of regulations and guidelines that include community education and tax incentives. It must be stressed that flex zoning typically does not address bulk specifically. Instead, new regulations and guidelines would be required in order to properly address how new construction is situated within the existing residential fabric. PAI l t Form -based building code from Salinas, CA showing setback and massing /imitations. This very general level of regulation, tailored to the scale of each neighborhood, can be written into Edinaf general code in tandem with the update of the Comprehensive Plan. �� 52 2. Community Education In addition to regulatory options and visual assessment, Edina has the opportunity to take an educational outreach approach to addressing neighborhood change. In many historic districts across the country, business and homeowners are encouraged to follow voluntary guidelines for materials replacement, setbacks, and signage. For Edina, there are several strategies through which appropriate yet varied construction and renovations can take place under voluntary programs with clear recommended guidelines. Some of the strategies to disseminate information as follows: THE EDINA DESIGN FORUM: CITIZENS COMMITTED TO RESIDENTIAL DESIGN Whatever form they take, Edina's design education, review and outreach programs will need coordination. The current task -force could continue as the Edina Design Forum —a mix of residents of varied backgrounds and expertise, this group would work with city staff to coordinate and evaluate the success of the possible programs. Overtime, ineffective programs could be phased out and popular programs improved. GRAPHIC ILLUSTRATIONS AND DISCUSSION MATERIALS Future forums, discussion groups and consulting will require visual examples of models for renovation and new design. A first task can be writing an illustrative booklet demonstrating appropriate massing, setback, window patterns and materials for various Edina neighborhoods. The book can describe the historic evolution of Edina, how lots and houses changed in scale, and how best to adapt them to today's needs without overwhelming smaller nearby properties. The book would be filled with photo, sketches, simulations of appropriate and inappropriate alterations, text, and sources for further information and materials. WEB SITE AND INFORMATION FORUM The Task Force can operate a website to include the graphic booklet along with links to appropriate city officials or other information sources. 53 HAY OOBBS PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS Regular public presentations can be planned for each of the city's neighborhoods to review Edina's history and change, the contents of graphic booklet and to answer homeowner questions. This presentation can also be brought to specific neighborhoods at their request. ARCHITECT AND CONTRACTOR CONTINUING EDUCATION Because most residential projects involve contractors and designers, the Forum can host special workshops for the building trades and professions. Topics can include Edina codes, review process, recommended materials, appropriate scale and approaches for conflict resolution with neighbors. Relevant city staff can also attend to introduce themselves. The goal would be to create a common understanding of high - quality design that can avoid community protest, delayed approvals, and costly redesigns. VOLUNTARY DESIGN REVIEW Homeowners seeking to build or renovate should be able to come to the Forum for voluntary design review. A volunteer panel of design professionals from Edina can provide advice, critique and support for projects when they are in the early schematic design phase. This input will help owners and contractors to have a clear sense of expectations and the opportunity to address them in the most cost - effective way possible. PRO -BONO PROFESSIONAL ADVICE The Forum can also establish a program whereby local design experts can provide 2 -3 hours of pro -bono advice for residents who are beginning to consider a building project. ANNUAL AWARDS PROGRAM This program can recognize complementary new construction and renovation in Edina while also lauding the work of specific volunteers or groups. Models include awards programs from the Minneapolis Committee on the Urban Environment (CUE) and awards programs from the Preservation Alliance of Minnesota. See the Preservation Alliance website and awards at: www. m»prereryation. org/ awar&2005 HAY 008BS 54 3. Tax Incentives With a possible model of historic preservation tax credits at the federal level, Edina can offer tax incentives in the form of delayed valuation increases or abatements for homeowners who pursue the voluntary design review process and follow volunteer panel advice. Current house assessed values could be frozen for five years after the project's completion. A second option is to reduce the tax mill rate for a set period of time. 55 HAY DOBBS Chapter V: Task Force Findings and Recommendations The following findings and recommendations are supported by the Task Force based on discussion and the research presented herein: Findings: I. Massing is a nationwide issue. The Task Force defines "massing" as: `The overall volume and scale of a building relative to the height, roof peek, setbacks, width, and sideyards of neighboring houses. Massing' is not an absolute set of measurements but is contextual Massing is based on existing neighborhood character, especially that experienced when moving along the street. " • Many cities are addressing the Issue . • No city has found an Ideal solution. • The Issue revolves around property rights. 2. Overall, residential rebuilding in Edina has been positive • Design has been pleasing and a good fit for the neighborhood; • Construction has been of good quality; • While the mass of new houses generally has been larger than neighboring houses, the mass has typically not been overwhelming; and • Residential rebuilding signals rebirth of neighborhoods. 56 3. Where residential reconstruction has raised concerns, the following were generally true: • The rebuilt house was In a neighborhood of small and /or narrow lots; and • The most common concern was that the rebuilt house was "too high," and /or too close to the lot line or too large for the lot relative to neighbors. 4. Residents expressed concern about lack of notification for teardowns and expansions. S. Residents expressed strong concerns about disruption and neighborhood livability during the construction of a new house or a major remodeling of an existing house. 6. To address neighborhood livability, the existing city codes may not be adequate to regulate residential projects. Some projects meeting city codes have raised citizen concerns. 7. In addressing new residential construction and expansions, the challenge is to find the appropriate balance between: -The right of a land owner to develop property; and -The right of neighboring land owners to the "peaceful enjoyment" of their property. HAY �� Recommendations: I. Mandatory neighbor notification prior to permit letting. Property owners who intend to build a new house or substantially rebuild an existing house should be required to notify neighboring property owners. The notification should involve demolition and construction start and completion dates along with elevation and site plans. Preferably, a perspective drawing showing the view of the completed project from the street should also be provided as part of the notification. The City should not issue a building permit until the notification has taken place. Ideally, the city should post these and other permit - related drawings on the city web site for public review. 2. Neighborhood design education. Create and support an ongoing outreach program for neighborhood education and project review. Staffed by the city, volunteers, and possibly outside consultants, this group could create "neighborhood handbooks" tailored to the scale, history, style and setbacks of each neighborhood. This handbook could identify character - defining features for each neighborhood and how to meet modern needs while protecting them. 3. Neighborhood focus for comprehensive plan update. When the Comprehensive Plan is updated in 2008, neighborhood geographic definition and character should be addressed. After completion of the, update, the zoning and building codes could be adjusted to address issues including: height, bulk, driveway coverage, and setback. These guidelines would be customized by lot size and neighborhood context. They would not restrict style, materials, or colors. 4. Voluntary Neighborhood Conservation Districts Groups of adjoining homeowners could have the option to create their own Neighborhood Conservation Districts which could further guide construction activity. S. Proactive Residential Construction Oversight and Regulation: • Start time • Parking • Congestion • Safety • Damage to adjoining property • Time to complete • Trees — loss & damage • Road damage • Storm water system damage • Propane tanks • Dumpsters • Portable toilets 57 HAY OOBBS Appendix- This Appendix is divided into the following sub - sections: • National and regional news articles • Community case studies and white papers • National Trust for Historic Preservation Studies • Sample research and perception study methodologies • Task Force Meeting Minutes • Other All of these sources informed the contents of this study and recommended options. HAY DOBBS 5 8 AGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 15, 2006 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - August 1, 2006 II. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATION 'FIT CITY' DESIGNATION - Scott Brener, Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry AWARDS PRESENTATION - Centennial Lakes Park and Edinborough Park I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of August 1, 2006 and Special Meeting of August 1, 2006 II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Zoning Ordinances: First Reading requires affirmative rollcall votes of three Council members except that a rezoning from residential to non - residential requires four affirmative votes. Second Reading requires affirmative rollcall votes of three of Council to pass except rezoning from residential to non - residential requires four affirmative votes. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall votes of four members of Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council members required passing. Conditional Use Permit Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council members required to pass. Variance. Appeal: Favorable rollcall of Council Members present to uphold or deny appeal Rollcall A. PUBLIC HEARING - FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, Rink Properties, 7300 Bush Lake Road III. ORDINANCES - First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of three Council Members to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative vote of four Council Members to pass. all A. FIRST READING - ORDINANCE NO. 2006 -5 - An ordinance amending Section 1235 Temporary Parking Permits IV. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS Agenda/ Edina City Council August 15, 2006 Page 2 V. AWARD OF BID A. Tralee Drive Water Main Improvements Contract No. ENG 06 -6 B. Hook Truck System - Public Works C. Parking Lot Renovation - Arneson Acres Park VI. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS A. Appointment of Bikeway Task Force B. Municipal State Aid Routes Special Assessment Policy C. Recreational Fire Report D. Canadian Pacific Rail Trail E. Resolution No. 2006 -79 Accepting Various Donations F. Lease Agreement - Cell Antenna - VanValkenburg Water Tower VII. FINANCE A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per Pre -List dated August 2, 2006, TOTAL $777,861.56; and August 9, 2006, TOTAL $1,246,072.40. VIII. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS DC. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES X. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL X. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEM Mon Aug 21 Tues Aug 29 Mon Sept 4 Tues Sept 5 Tues Sept12 Tues Sept. 12 Tues Sept19 Tues Oct 3 Tues Oct 17 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS Joint Session with Edina School District 5:00 P.M. FILING OPENS - City Council Offices 8:00 A.M. LABOR DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Offices Closed Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. FILING CLOSES City Council Office 5:00 P.M. PRIMARY ELECTION DAY - Polls Open From 7:00 A.M. until 8:00 P.M. Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. SCHOOL BOARD ROOM #349 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE COUNCIL CHAMBERS CITY CLERK'S OFFICE COUNCIL CHAMBr-- COUNCIL CHAMI COUNCIL CHAMBL_ MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL AUGUST 1, 2006 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Housh, Hulbert, Swenson and Chair Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Hulbert and seconded by Commissioner Housh approving the Consent Agenda for the, Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR JULY 18, 2006, APPROVED Motion JAade by Commissioner Hulbert and seconded by Commissioner Housh approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for July 18, 2006, as presented. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Commissioner Hulbert - and seconded by Commissioner Housh approving the payment of claims dated July 19,'1006, and consisting of one page, TOTAL $2,143.75. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda, Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned. Executive Director lees `FIT CITY' DESIGNATION (SCOTT BRENER - MN DEPT OF LABOR/INDUSTRY) and .AWARDS PRESENTATION - CENTENNIAL LAKES and EDINBOROUGH PARK No packet data 0 Oral presentation F-1 Information coming MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL AUGUST 1, 2006 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Housh, Hulbert, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Hulbert and seconded by Member Housh approving the Council Consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hulbe ;t, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 18, 2006, APPROVED Motion made by Member Hulbert and seconded by Member Housh approving the Minutes for the Regular Meeting of the Edina City Council for July 18, 2006, as presented. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. WINNERS OF THE .2006 'IMAGES OF EDINA' PHOTO CONTEST PRESENTED Laura Fulton, Communications Coordinator, presented the winner of the photography contest in the Learning and Living categories, Polly Norman. Ilrid Richards, was the winner in the category of Raising Families. Ms. Fulton said the deadline for next years' 'Images of Edina' Photo Contest was June 27, 2007, for photographic submissions by residents or persons who work in Edina. *HEARING DATE SET FOR AUGUST 15, 2006, FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN - RINK PROPERTIES, 7300 BUSH LAKE ROAD Motion made by Member Hulbert and seconded by Member Housh setting August 15, 2006, as hearing date for Final Development Plan for Rink Properties, 7300 Bush Lake Road. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS No residents appeared to speak. *AWARD OF BID FOR ONE WYGANT 24 CHANNEL DIGITAL LOGGER AND SOFTWARE UPGRADE - POLICE DEPARTMENT Member Hulbert made a motion approving the award of bid for one Wygant 24 channel digital logger and software upgrade for the Police Department to sole bidder, Loffler Companies at $19,340.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. NEW INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE FOR BLUE PLATE RESTAURANT APPROVED Manager Hughes indicated an application has been received for a new intoxicating and, Sunday On -Sale liquor license by Blue Plate Restaurant Company to operate the rebuilt, Edina Grill, located at 5028 France Avenue South. Currently, the Edina Grill operates at 3907 West 501h Street as a restaurant with an on -sale wine and beer license and they desire obtaining a full intoxicating liquor license. The application has been reviewed by the Administration, Health, Planning and Police Departments with no Page 1 Minutes/Edina City Council/August 1, 2006 negative findings. Staff recommends approving the intoxicating and Sunday On -Sale Liquor Licenses. David Burley, 5349 Whiting Avenue, informed the Council they will close the existing restaurant on Labor Day and reopen at the new location on September 26, 2006. The new restaurant will have additional seating as well as patio seating. He said their request was for licensing for a full -bar in the new location. Member Housh made a motion closing the public hearing, seconded by Member Swenson. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Motion made by Member Swenson approving the issuance of Intoxicating and Sunday On -Sale Liquor Licenses for Blue Plate Restaurant Company dba/Edina Grill for period beginning August 1, 2006 to March 31, 2007. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -77 - ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained in order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Hulbert introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO 2006 -77 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Donation to the Edina Fire Department: MN State Dept of Homeland Security & Emergency Mgmt $1,000 Epson LCD Projector Donation to the Edina Art Center: Edina Community Foundation's Peggy Kelly Memorial Fund $2,037.66 for Italian Mask Maker Workshop Donation to the Edina Senior Center: Edina Community Foundation LCD Projector/Installation $2,863.18 Donation to the Communications Department: Edina Community Foundation $1,550.00 Camera - Canon XL2 Donation to Park and Recreation Department: Edina Community Foundation $3,000 - Fireworks Display Page 2 I Minutes/Edina City Council/August 1, 2006 Centennial Lakes Lighthouse Event Dated: August 1, 200. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. YOUTH SPORTS TASK FORCE REPORT PRESENTED Director Keprios indicated at the June 20, 2006, Council meeting, the Youth Task Force was asked to consider the approved Council motion as delineated, 1) criteria for background checks, 2) legal opinion on liability the City might incur if there was involvement, 3) signature for receipt of the documents, 4) definition of what an athletic association is, i.e. listing or describing them, and 5) grievance process when an association may have their own process with a larger organization they were a part of and to be back on the Council Agenda at the August 1, 2006, regular meeting. The Task Force met on July 25th and addressed each issue as follows: 1. Criteria for Background Checks Task Force recommended mandatory background checks by a private company on all candidates 18 and older who wish to serve as a coach. 2. Legal Opinion on Liability Attorney Gilligan drafted a memo dated July 24, 2006, addressing liability exposure due to adoption of the Task Force recommendations. 3. Signature for Receipt of the Documents The Relationship Document language was changed to no longer mandate all parents requirement to sign documents but they must read and understand the document. 4. Definition of an Edina Youth Athletic Association The Task Force recommended a seven point definition of requirements to be an Edina Youth Athletic Association. 5. Grievance Process When an Association May Have Their Own Process With a Larger Organization They were a Part Of The Task Force must have a grievance process in place. In cases where an Association was subject to governance by an affiliate organization, grievances were first heard by the Youth Athletic Association and if appealed heard by their respective District, State or National Affiliation, and depending upon the type of grievance, may be appealed to their respective District, State or National Affiliation. Otherwise, the grievance was handled strictly at a local level. Grievances brought to the Edina Youth Athletic Association that do not involve governance by their affiliate organization can be appealed to the Edina Park and Recreation staff as defined in the Relationship Agreement and then to the Edina Park Board. Mr. Keprios reminded the Council that the grievance process does not deal with either team or coach assignment or the tryout process. The Task Force additionally recommended that City staff and the insurance consultant establish minimum insurance requirements of each and every association that uses Edina's public athletic facilities, and provides for the protection of volunteers, associations as shown in the Relationship Document. Following a Council discussion, Member Swenson made a motion adopting the Youth Sports Core Values and Relationship Documents with changes to punctuation and spelling as recommended by the Youth Sports Task Force and the addition of No. 8 to Page 3 Minutes/Edina City Council/Auggst 1, 2006 Appendix 1.2 requiring that the Association agrees to adopt the Relationship Document. Member Hulbert seconded the motion. Ayes: Hulbert, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. PANDEMIC FLU REPORT PRESENTED Mr. Hughes indicated that in response to the Council's inquiry on preparations for a pandemic flu. He gave background that Avian flu (H5N1) has spread through bird populations in Asia, Russia and has been detected in European countries. No one knows if H5N1 will become as virulent and contagious in people as it was in birds. Many experts were convinced that even if this flu virus does not explode into a pandemic, another one will, a pandemic event differs from the majority of risks we face in that we will not have access to the resources we were accustomed to having in an emergency. The threat of avian flu calls for contingency planning at all levels, especially the local level, where the burden of response will fall in the event of a pandemic event. Mr. Hughes introduced Chief Siitari who gave an overview of the City's Emergency Preparedness Plan in general. Deputy Chief Carlson explained staff was leading a thorough review of the City's emergency operations plan, fine - tuning it to work as a response plan to a flu pandemic. Knowing that the City's work force would be reduced if a pandemic were to occur, he said he was working with a, team to prioritize City services that would be available in the event of a pandemic. Mr. Carlson stressed that education and continuity of operations planning would be critical tasks to concentrate on. The City has a structure and plan in place to address crisis events based on an all hazards approach., The plan would be used to address the threat of avian flu. Addendums and procedures were being developed to prepare the City to handle a pandemic event. Education and continuity of operations planning were critical tasks City staff was engaged in. Pandemic planning was an ongoing process that will adapt to new information as it develops on a national and international basis. No formal Council action was taken. *DATE SET FOR CANVASS OF ELECTION RETURNS - 5:00 P.M. NOVEMBER 8, 2006. Member Hulbert made a motion setting November 8, 2006, at 5:00 p.m. as the date to canvass election returns for the November 7, 2006, election, seconded by Member Housh. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *RESOLUTION NO 2006 -78 - APPOINTING PRIMARY ELECTION JUDGES Member Hulbert introduced the following resolution, seconded by Member Housh and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2006-78 APPOINTING ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE SEPTEMBER 12, 2006 PRIMARY ELECITON WHEREAS, Minnesota Election Law 204B.21 requires that persons serving as election judges be appointed by the Council at least 25 days before the election. Page 4 I Minutes/Edina City Council/August 1, 2006 BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the individuals named on Exhibit A, and on file in the office of the City Clerk be appointed as election judges for the primary election to be conducted on September 12, 2006; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk was with this, authorized to make any substitutions or additions as deemed necessary. Passed and adopted by the Edina City Council this,1st day of August, 2006. EXHIBIT A Katherine Aby Patricia Dill Nancy Hopf Rita Acker Robert Dillon Judy Hoppe John Adams Shirley Dillon Annette Horton David Alkire Charlotte Domek Terri Hudoba John Alt Shirley Doyle George Hunter Carolyn Anderson Anne Duff Paulette Hutton Frances Anderson Claudia Eggan Myra Hykes Lorraine Anderson Lyle Eide Delores Isaacson Pat Andrus Clara R Engelbert Kathy Iverson Jackie Barnard Paul Fink Marilyn P Jackson Ralf Bates Lisa Flint Allen C Johnson Carol Bertelson Joseph A Florenzano Eunice Johnson Edna Boehnke Vi Frana Geraldine Ann Johnson Juliet L Boemer Rebecca Frederick Kate Johnson Vince Bongaarts Eileen D Freeman Naomi Johnson Patricia Boran Kathy Frey Shirley Johnson _ Holly Borgen _ Pam Gagnon Ann R Kapaun Katherine Bradbury Devorah Goldstein Ann Keenan ZoeAnne Brandberg Sue Goodman Jessica D Kingston Adele H Brellenthin Carol Gottesman Mavis Klefsaas Mary Brindle George Griffiths Marcia Koester Joann Buie Eunice Groschen Julia Kosters James H Burnett Leticia Guadarrama Dorothy M Krueger Raymond S Buttschau Muza Habeck. Dorothy Kuether Mary Calgren Maryann Haemig Mary J Landberg Christine Campion Eugene E Haman Mary Leak Janet Cardle Mary Ann Hans Patricia M Leefeldt John Cardle Brian Hansen Cecile Lehman Elaine Carlson Joan Hanson Bob Lindsey John Carlson Jean Hare Jean Liudahl Sandra Carlson Meredith Hart Susan Long Richard Cheng Shawn Hartfeldt Lois Loomis Judy Cipolla Buddy Hasnudeen William Lucas Robert V Clapp Mary Hasnudeen Ginny Mach Katherine Conley Henry L Hatch Linda Maetzold Eileen Cooke Maxine Hatzung Barbara Martin Jack Cracraft Jacqueline Hegman Sally Mays Marian Cracraft Cheryl Heley Barb McFarlane Colleen Crew Bethel Hoaglund Rosemary McGlynn Patrice Darrell Lisa Holmberg Frank McGoldrick Gloria DeBerg Carleen Holvik Carol Melichar Delpha DeZellar Helen Honmyhr Ruth Mell Page 5 Minutes/Edina Citv Council/August 1, 2006 Marvin Menzel Betty Pollitt Pat Merritt Holmes Wendy Powell Nancy Miller Linda Presthus Patricia Mills Judith Proudfit Louise Mollick Richard G Pryse Paul Monson Beth Montgomery Jang Moran Larry Motl Ron Naae Margaret E Nath Janet Nelson Susan Niefeld Alice Nix Judith Norback Dennis Nyberg Sally Nyberg Patti Olander Audrey Olson Ordell O'Neill Mary Osborn Andy Otness Pete Pappas Mary K Pate jean Pearce Carole Peterson Doris Peterson John Peterson Maria Pinkstaff Robert Reed Gail Roberts Lois Robertson Judith Rodgers Robert Rohlf David Rosenbaum Luann Rosenthal- Erickson Mark Rustad Mary A. Ryan Mary E. Ryan Penny Sandberg Paul Schroeder Radonna Schwarz Carol Schwerdfeger Amy Scott Marion P Selid Beverly Severson Mike Sewall Jacky Smith Penny Smith Ruth Smith Gail Stalpes Lynne Stanley Ardelle Stark Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. Michael Stolee Cynthia L Stone Gail Teas Abbie Thiss Andrea Tiggas Donna Tilsner James W Tindall Muriel Towler Viem Truong Liz VanZomeren Darla J Vashro Ephie Volpe Ray Voss Patti Wales ' Jini Washburn Joan Watkins Jenny Weber Deanna Weeks Mike Welbaum Ardis Wexler Elizabeth Wiley Patricia Williams Loretta Wold Linda Wood Mary Yee Jane M Zimmerman Peter Zirbel Margaret Zverinova *CHANGE ORDER APPROVED - WALL DEMOLITION - GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION Motion made by Member Hulbert and seconded by Member Housh approving the change order for wall demolition for the gymnasium construction to Gladstone Construction at $621.50. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *CHANGE ORDER APPROVED - FOUNDATION FOOTINGS - SOUTH VIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY CENTER GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION Motion made by Member Hulbert and seconded by Member Housh approving the change order for installation of foundation footings to be placed under the stoop entrances at South View Middle School gym and the Edina Community Center gym to Arnt Construction at $1,288.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Member Hulbert made a motion and Member Housh seconded the motion approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated July 18, 2006, and consisting of 32 pages: General Fund $296,087.44; CDBG Fund $48.00, Communications Fund $3,042.23; Working Capital Fund $354,464.35; Construction Fund $85,730.03; Art Center Fund $961.70; Golf Dome Page 6 Minutes/Edina City Council/August 1, 2006 Fund $1,317.01; Aquatic Center Fund $14,673.54; Golf Course Fund $33,982.97; Ice Arena Fund $7,049.68; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $7,070.68; Liquor Fund $229,184.96; Utility Fund $1,679,057.68; Storm Sewer Fund $126,167.69; PSTF Agency Fund $1,902.59; TOTAL $2,840,740.55; and for approval of payment of claims dated July 26, 2006, and consisting of 40 pages: General Fund $403,483.91; Communications Fund $12,332.44; Working Capital Fund $25,241.50; Construction Fund $1,061.56; Art Center Fund $16,988.54; Aquatic Center Fund $20,514.54; Golf Course Fund $31,288.39; Ice Arena Fund $7,200.26; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $35,442.04; Liquor Fund $153,069.62; Utility Fund $51,971.65; Storm Sewer Fund $18,376.19; PSTF $1,892.11; TOTAL $778,862.75. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *PETITION RECEIVED REQUESTING CURB AND GUTTER AT 5100 JUANITA AVENUE Motion made by Member Hulbert and seconded by Member Housh acknowledging receipt of the petition requesting curb and gutter at 5100 Juanita Avenue and to refer the petition to the Engineering Department for processing as to feasibility. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 8:32 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Page 7 City Clerk MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL AUGUST 1, 2006 5:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Housh, Hulbert, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Absent was Member Masica. Mayor Hovland stated the purpose of the Special Meeting was to begin the public hearing process on the preliminary 2007 budget. He reviewed the preliminary schedule for budget adoption noting the City Council would establish a maximum levy for the 2007 budget at their September 5, 2006, Council meeting. He added that in early December 2006 the Council would conduct a Truth in Taxation hearing before final budget adoption later in December,. Mayor Hovland stated this meeting would focus first on advisory boards and commissions' testimony before reviewing the budget in detail. Manager Hughes stated the'Council may decide to impose a lesser levy than what they decide to adopt at their September 5, 2006, meeting, but they may not impose a higher levy. He gave a brief overview of the 2007 Draft Operating Budget beginning with the General Fund expenditures, noting the main components of the expenditure increases included: 3% cost of living increase factored into wages, $60 /month health insurance increase for employees, increase in property and liability insurance coverage which run from July to July, fuel cost increases and commodities related to petroleum which would include items such as asphalt, etc. Mr. Hughes noted there would be a decrease in legal costs with the new prosecutor. He said the last increase was from an expenditure for the comprehensive plan, since the updated Comprehensive Plan was due in 2008 -which meant 2007 was the work year for compiling the update. Mr. Hughes added it was proposed to use reserves from the 2005 Budget as a one -time expenditure to fund the work of updating the Comp Plan during 2007. Mr. Hughes said that new services in 2007 were mainly staff oriented noting the following proposed additions: Utility engineer to be funded out of the Utility Fund, a new detective, a paramedic/ firefighter which would be partially off set by a reduction in overtime, two new part -time inspectors in Building to cover the many inspections and a new IT person due to the complexity of the City's computer and telephone systems. Mr. Hughes explained the rationale for all the proposed new hires and discussed with Council the reasons for each proposed addition. He pointed out that it had been quite some time since new positions had been added to staff. Mr. Hughes said the expenditure increase to support the proposed budget would be approximately 6.8% for a total of $29,493,804. Mr. Hughes reviewed and explained the 2007 estimate of non -tax revenues which would include: • Licenses and permits increase $200,000 Investment income increase $45,000 • Ambulance revenue increase $125,000 Liquor transfer $721,200 Mr. Hughes said the 2007 tax levy for the General Fund was proposed to be increased 4.7 %, with the Debt Levy proposed to be decreased 7% which would require a total tax levy increase of 3.4 %. He explained the debt levy would be decreased by a one -time use of the 2005 reserve to cancel the last year of the equipment certificates debt due in 2007. Mr. Hughes explained the 2007 Budget would result in a fund balance of about 42% which was within the recommended guidelines of the State Auditor (30 % -50 %). He said that cities generally receive their twice a year when its gets a tax settlement in July and again in December. The purpose fund balance for the General Fund was to pay the bills in between the time when tax settlements were received. Mr. Hughes added that Minutes/Edina City Council/Special Meeting August 1, 2006 the annual financial statements capture the best financial scenario because all the City's bills were paid and the December tax settlement had been received, but the City must wait until July before its next'receipt of taxes so the fund balance would be used to pay expenses. The Council asked if the proposed reserve included any of the 2005 reserve. Mr. Hughes explained that approximately $450,000 had been spent and approximately $800,000 remained. Council discussion of the proposed 2007 Budget included: loss of market value homestead credit, impact of required increases to the City's contribution to PERA, 2005 reserves one time uses, proposed new positions for 2006, and update of the Comprehensive Plan. Human Relations Commission Presentation Mary Brindle, Chair, Edina Human Relations Commission, reviewed the process the Human Relations Commission used in arriving at their following recommendations for Human Services Funding: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Senior Community Services $27,800 Cornerstone 15,100 VEAP Women,In Transition The Bridge Minneapolis Mediation Program Normandale Center The Bridge Store to Door Chrysalis OPERATIONS Continuing Education Dues Materials Program /Citizen Participation Edina Resource Center Research, Planning & Coordination 17,500 4,750 $4,000 5,000 $5,000 5,000 3,600 3,660 $86,350.00 $250 $200 $500 $800 $1,750.00 $35,061.00 11641.00 The Council thanked the Commission for their work in developing their proposed budget. They also asked for more detail on the numbers of Edina citizens served by some agencies. Details will be provided to the Council before final adoption of the 2007 Budget. Mayor Hovland reminded the Council there would be a Truth in Taxation Hearing in December 2006, and the Council would adopt the 2007 Budget at its regular meeting later in December 2006. Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Housh to close the Year 2007 Budget Hearing. Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 6:50 P.M. Respectfully submitted, City Clerk , 1 To: Mayor & City Council From: Dan Cornejo Interim City Planner REPORURECOM M EN DATION Date: August 15, 2006 Subject: Final Development Plan Rink Properties, 7300 Bush Lake Road, Edina, MN Recommendation: Agenda Item: II. A. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ Action: ❑ To HRA To Council Motion Resolution Ordinance Discussion At their July 26, 2006 meeting the Planning Commission recommended Final Development Plan Approval for Rink Properties, 7300 Bush Lake Road, Edina, MN subject to: • Plans to be submitted that provide for the construction of the fire lane (south of the proposed structure) with a pervious. paving system approved by the City Engineer. • If more than.fifty percent (50 %) of the square footage of the building is ever demolished or destroyed, or the building materials removed, this variance lapses. Information /Background: Rink Properties, 7300 Bush Lake Road, has requested a Final Development Plan to allow the construction of a rigid frame structure as a permanent building. In February 2006, the,City Council approved a request to allow Rink Properties to remodel and convert the old Northwest Tennis Club site to accommodate two hockey ice sheets and the required support facilities. On April 6, 2006, the Zoning Board granted variances to allow spectator seating to be added and to allow a temporary air - supported fabric dome structure to house a third ice sheet. Subsequent to these approvals City officials determined the building code required a larger separation between the main building and the proposed temporary air - support structure. At this time to meet Code requirements Rink Properties is proposing to add a rigid, steel- supported membrane structure, with sprinklers to comply with the building code. See attached staff report, meeting minutes and correspondence. I I DRAFT MINUITES PC MEETING JULY 26, 2006 P -06 -5 Final Development Plan Rink Properties 7300 Bush Lake Road Request: Construction of rigid mem Mr. Cornejo informed the Commission llon Febtuary21, 20D6, the City Council granted final approval for the Final De�7elopmen Plan for Rinl�Prope�rties to allow the existing Northwest Tennis Club site to be rem6deled and converted for use as two hoekey rinks and the required suppp)rt'fecilities `Continuing, Mr. Cornejo said on April 6, 2006, the Zoning Board grante&vanance�to allow spectator seating and to allow a temporar3rnir- supported fabric dome structure to house a third ice rink. Mr. Cornejo explained at this me due to cc�nf�ct witFi-building code the temporary air-supported fabric dometid not r�eet building requirements. At this P ry Pp � � � � � time the proponents are requestifig a�provat of a pe anent building with a similar fabric membrane, but with afigid steel frame hat` meets the building code requirements. Continuing, Mr. CQrnejo said',the proposed rigid frame structure is designed to be a permanent building and pos\es_no.additional planning - related concerns. The building wiltalso be\\s�prinkled. Mr. -6mejo corhtluded staff recor%mends approval of the application with 1. the condition that the plans -tie revised to pr(vide for the construction of the fire Iane,Fsouth,W the proposed str�cture)' iith,,a pervious paving system approved by the C Engineer. Mai: Dennis Batty and; Mr. Malarkey were present representing the property Corn, missiorier Steuntorr commented that he is wrestling with the purpose behind the variance to "allow,a permanent "temporary" fabric dome structure, and if approved would,a precedent be set. Mr. Cornejo responded by law variances are not precedent setting. Each property is unique and should be reviewed on its individual merits. Mr. Cornejo said in this instance a variance is requested from the required exterior building material standards for the Planned Industrial District. Mr. Cornejo noted this type of material is often used on athletic or recreational structures. In the PID zoning Planning Commission Minutes July 26, 2006 Page 2 of 5 district recreational facilities are a permitted land use so it may not be unrealistic to see requests for this type of "structure" considering the land use is permitted. Commissioner Staunton acknowledged the land use is permitted, but the materials used on the exterior of the structure are not. Mr. Cornejo said he agrees with that statement and reiterated this type of building and exterior building materials is repeatedly used in athletic and /or recreational structures, garden facilities, including Edina (City Golf Dome). I � Chair Workinger questioned why this "strd tc u(e'tis now considered permanent and not temporary. Mr. Cornejo responded t�e proposed.membrane structure will be "up" over 6 months and any structure "UW thatJong is �equiT6d.,. by Code to be sprinkled and is considered permaneh� Continuing, Mr. Cornejo/ explained this type of structure has a "long life ",end can 6e left up foryears. The previous tennis dome structure on the site (formlly Northwest Tennis) Was"" considered temporary because it was inflated and deflated eae"ear, and wasn't sprinkled. Mr. Batty addressed the Commission and stated the journey%fhrough this process has been very interesting an¢'at times7unexpected. Mr. Batty said to comply with building and fire codes changes neede to be i n .emented to the membrane structure to meet code. 6ontinuing, Mr.�tty told, the Commission this type of fabric structure is apopular/choice as a sporting facility (tennis, hockey, soccer). Mr. Batty suggested that the exterior building materials used on this type of structure be allowed i� the PID zpning distri''t, especially, since the land use is a permitted use ` Commissioner Staur top asked Mr. Batty if the steel frame of the proposed structure , "a needed to.support he sprinklers. Mr. Batty responded in the affirmative. Commission"taunto"ommanted it would appear this type of structure is more_economical "then the traditional permanent structure. Mr. Batty acknowlejaed that observation is correct. Chair Workinger asked if the property owners have given any indication on hoWlong they believe this permanent "temporary" structure will be "up" before it is replaced with "permanent permanent" structure. Mr. Malarkey responded the property owners believe, /this structure will remain between five and seven years. Chair Workinger questioned/ why a permanent structure isn't constructed immediately. Mr:\Patty responded in reality it is the cost of a permanent structure vs. the cost of a "temporary permanent" structure. Chair Workinger asked Mr. Batty when the time comes for the permanent structure to be constructed would the exterior materials match the existing structure. Mr. Batty responded in the affirmative. Chair Workinger asked Mr. Batty if the property owners have any concerns about vandalism. He said the fabric like material may be an easy target Planning Commission Minutes July 26, 2006 Page 3 of 5 for vandals. Mr. Batty responded this type of fabric is very strong and is a cut resistant "rip stop" material. Mr. Batty said the property owners have also been discussing the possibility of a fence around the dome. Commissioner Grabiel referred to minutes from the zoning board meeting and asked Mr. Batty to respond to the Board's concern that this project keeps appearing before the Commission, Zoning Board and Council. Continuing, Commissioner Grabiel also asked if they believe this is' t4e,last time they will appear before the Commission. Mr. Batty responded if the propeffy owners had to do it all over again they would have come in witl,a complete protect. Continuing, Mr. Malarkey said timing was theiissue.' Initially the property owners wanted this project placed on the fast track so the facyit -codId pe used immediately during the current hockey season. After the hockey`season was ; over they would request the spectator seating W. Mr. Batty commented hooey has windows, reiterating if they knew what theyXnow now about the process they would have come in with a complete package. `Cppbluding, MrI-7 ty stated to the best of his knowledge this is their last request. Commissioner Fischer ack give the proponents a tough time; were not intentional. Commissioner Fischer mo Approval. Commissioner Grabiel for discussion. at the Zoning Boardp6eting he did Ie truly believes their repeated visits the ;lopment Plan Workinger asked Commissioner Staunton said at this point he is confused about the variances and._the..process thus far. He asked if this proposal includes a variance request., \`�_ /'Mr. Cornejoresponded,the first - request and action was for Final Developrrtent Plan approval (February 2006) and the second request and action Was the/Zoning Board (A�412006) granting variances to allow spectator seating, a, setback - variance for dome height and an exterior materials variance to allow a Teflgn coated-dome facility` Continuing, Mr. Cornejo said both dome structures (previously, approved and,proposed) are the same height, are air supported with rigid frame,.Fonstruction /;however, City Code measures height at the roof line differently. The previously approved dome required a 16 -foot setback variance which the Board,approveO %The application this evening is for a rigid frame membrane gable structure which meets setback and doesn't require a setback variance. Concluding;`Mr. Cornejo said what is before the Commission this evening is in reality a repetition of the variances previously granted, noting the previous dome and proposed dome are different and this change requires a Final Development Plan. Commissioner Staunton clarified the variance before the Commission this evening is only a repetition of the variance granted for exterior building materials. Mr. Cornejo responded in the affirmative. Planning Commission Minutes July 26, 2006 Page 4 of 5 1 Commissioner Staunton stated he still struggles with the hardship test. Commissioner Staunton said hearing that it is too expensive to build a structure that meets code requirements is a struggle to support and meet the "hardship" definition. Concluding Commissioner Staunton commented in his opinion it appears the hardship is monetary. Commissioner Fischer said as he understands it the,.pr000n�ents found out late in the game that the originally approved dome structure (app�ved by Zoning Board) didn't meet the Uniform Building Code which,re�su,lted in redesign and the subsequent additional hearing. Mr. Cornejo said the whole area of variancesis coniplicated,\ add ing wheh he reviewed this'request he felt an undue hardship was not created by the applicant and the request was in keeping with t spirit an&intent of the Code Continuing, Mr. Cornejo said City Code requires` 1: atbuildings` n the Planned Industrial District be constructed of durable materials. Thkk�equir` bent ensures that structures "fit" with each other and their neighbors. Mr. Cornej"xplained at the staff level staff also looks at the spirdand intent-Of the Cod&,Mr`. Cornejo' stated that obviously this is a monetary iss,L4-,��wever, just as obvious is that this is a new venture in an existing r�,novated buildin�, and to -make this venture successful a third ice sheet was needed. ;Mr, %Comejo.,said if,the venture is successful a money stream would,flow/and tfie permahen "temporary" building would be replaced by a perma6n6uilding� adding.tliis could be viewed as an evolution of their business. dbnclGding Mr. `Cornejo sa1d_ he was comfortable supporting this request. He seid in his opinion-thp request before the Commission meets the spirit and intent of the Code. The proposed rigid membrane structure is located at th"nd of a dead -end cul de sac, abutting Rail Road traoks is surroui ded by other industrial uses (Gabberts, Filmtect) and has minimaYif any impact on rdsi�ential propertiios and public streets. Mr. Cornejo added if a im'ilar proposal would com0, 9 ore the City and if the conditions were exlictly the same it is pweble Staff could support another venture of this type; howev �f•, if this facility proposed along a heavily trafficked street or abutted residential.properties that would be an entirely different scenario. "Commissioner Staunton commented that clarification helps. Commiss`ioger S60nton /isaid his initial concern was that someone else could come in and'request atinal development Plan with variance for a similar type of structure because they " didn't want to sink a lot of money into the project ". Continuing, Commissioner Staunton said he wanted to ensure that the process is "buttoned up "; adding tfie explanation by Mr. Cornejo on his reasons to support the proposal make sense. The rationale that this proposal is located at the dead - end of a cul de sac, is located along RR tracks, is surrounded by other industrial uses and not visible by residential neighbors makes a good case for support. �r ■ t Planning Commission Minutes July 26, 2906 Page 5 of & Commissioner Grabiel thanked Mr. Cornejo for his guidance and commented he agrees with statements from Commissioner Staunton and is confident that the Commission will hear any "new ventures" and will act on each proposal on its own merits. Commissioner Fischer said he considered the testimony and the discussion this evening regarding the Final Development'Plan; r' ,'lrl,, CD ok e �J � �O aaa REQUEST FOR COMMISSION /COUNCIL ACTION Originator Request Agenda # Planning Department Final Development Plan P-06 -5 By Meeting Date/Time Approved: Dan Cornejo Wednesday, July 26, 2006 Interim Planning Director 7:00 PM GENERAL INFORMATION: Applicant: Rink Properties — 7300 Bush Lake Rd., Edina PID: 08- 116 -21 -14 -0007 Request: Final Development Plan Proposal: Add a rigid frame structure as a permanent building Existing Zoning: PID, Planned Industrial District Comprehensive Plan: Industrial Deadline for Agency Action: September 4, 2006 Application Date: Application deemed complete July 5, 2006 60 Days: September 3, 2006 Extensions: 120 Days: STAFF REPORT: Background: On February 21, 2006 the City Council granted final approval to the Final Development Plan for Rink Properties to allow the existing Northwest Tennis Club site and building to be remodeled and converted for use as two hockey rinks and the required support facilities, for primary use as a youth hockey training and practice facility (P- 06 -02). Existing parking as approved for the Final Development Plan is 320 spaces, exceeding the required parking of 200 spaces. On April 6, 2006 the Zoning Board granted variances to allow spectator seating and to allow a temporary air - supported fabric dome structure fora third ice rink, with less than the required setbacks, on the property to be located on the parking lot south of the main building (B- 06 -19). It was determined that the temporary dome would preempt 105 parking spaces, leaving 215 parking spaces, more than what was required by Code. No additional parking was required for the temporary dome structure. Subsequent to these approvals, City officials determined the building code required a larger separation between the main building and the proposed temporary air - supported structure. This application proposes a similar fabric structure, but with a rigid steel frame, as a permanent building that meets the building code requirements. Project Site and Context/Neighborhood Description: The project site is located at 7300 Bush Lake Road, on the west side, just north I f Dewey Hill Road. The, overall site contains approximately 4 acres. To the north is Edina Mini - Storage (7225 Bush Lake Rd.). To the east is the Gassen Company (7275 Bush Lake Rd.). To the south is the U.S..Postal Facility — West Edina Carrier Annex. And to the west, across the railroad tracks, are FilmTec Corp. (5400 Dewey HIII Rd.) and Gabbert's Service Center (7215 Cahill Rd.). Project Description: Rink Properties, LLC, is proposing to add a rigid, steel- supported membrane structure, 120' wide by 220' long (26,400 sq. ft.), as a permanent structure for the purpose of providing a hockey practice and training facility. The same material is to be used on both roof and walls of the proposed structure. The material will be an insulated Teflon coated fiberglass material that will be stretched between rigid metal trusses that are spaced about 10' on center. The exterior of the building will have a monolithic appearance. The fabric will be a light tan color. Suspended from this steel frame will be sprinklers, sprinkler piping, lighting, and HVAC ductwork. The proposed structure will have a gabled roof; the height will be 35' at the ridge and 17' at the eave. This structure will not provide spectator seating. The location of this structure is to the south of the existing building, on what is currently a parking lot. A fire lane is being added down the south side of the proposed addition at the direction of the fire marshal. In terms of landscaping, the existing trees that straddle the southern property line are being retained; no new landscaping is being provided (see Landscape Plan in drawing L1.0), other than that approved by City Council on February 21. Analysis of Issues: With respect to the site plan, the building addition and its location appear acceptable to staff in terms of the hockey practice and training operation and in 4 their relationship to the adjacent use to the south, i.e. the post office facility. Planning and Engineering staff believe the site plan could be improved by requiring that the fire land (south of the proposed structure) be constructed with a pervious paving system. Therefore, staff believes this Final Development Plan, revised to include.the pervious paving system for the fire lane, meets the required findings for Final Development Plan: a. is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; b. is consistent with the (Final) Development Plan as approved and modified by the Council; c. will not be detrimental to properties surrounding the tract; d. will not result in an overly- intensive land use; e. will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards; f. conforms to the provisions of this Section and applicable provisions of this Code; and g. provides a proper relationship between the proposed improvements, existing structures, open space and natural features. With respect to the exterior building material, Rink Properties is requesting a variance because the Teflon coated insulated vinyl membrane does not match or blend with the building materials of the adjacent existing building (concrete block), as required in 850.17 Planned Industrial District (PID) Subd. 4 Special Requirements D. 2, i.e. All subsequent additions, exterior alterations and accessory buildings constructed after the erection of an original building or buildings shall be constructed of materials comparable to those used in the original construction and shall be designed in a manner conforming to the original architectural design and general appearance. A variance can be granted when the strict enforcement of the Code would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the petitioner's property and the granting of said variance is in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Code. "Undue hardship" means that (i) the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use as allowed by the Code, (ii) the plight of the petitioner is due to circumstances unique to the petitioner's property which were not created by the petitioner; and (iii) the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the property or its surroundings. Our Planning Department variance application lists four questions based on these findings. The applicant has responded as follows: Relieve an undue hardship which was not self - imposed or a mere inconvenience. It is hard to know just how to respond to this item. The City of Edina allows the construction and use of temporary and permanent buildings that are fabric covered, yet they require a variance for building additions that are of a different 3 material than the original structure. Our intent through the use of color is to blend the two structures together as much as possible. Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property, but not applicable to other property, in the vicinity or zoning district. Again it is difficult to know just how this statement might apply to this request for variance. It seems to us that if the particular zoning allows the use of a particular building type such as hockey rinks, that it should allow the type of structures and materials that you might typically use for that use, even in the original zoning. Preserve a substantial property right possessed by other property in the vicinity or zoning district. We believe that this type of structure is very logical in the PID zoning. 'We believe this would be true of any other hockey rink proposed in this particular zoning district anywhere in the City of Edina. Not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the vicinity or zoning district. We believe that using a Teflon coated fiberglass building material for the exterior finish in a permanent or temporary structure would not be in any way detrimental or injurious to this location. The temporary structure would not be out of character in this neighborhood. Conclusion /Recommendation This proposed rigid frame structure, designed to be a permanent building that addresses the building code issues that arose with the temporary air - supported structure approved by the Zoning Board (as a variance application), poses no additional planning - related concerns; in fact, it does not require a variance for the sideyard setback as did the temporary air - supported structure. Staff recommends approval of this application, with the condition that the plans be revised to provide for the construction of the fire lane (south of the proposed structure) with a pervious paving system approved by the City Engineer. 4 rd 21111 -in "A The Dennis Batty. & Associates Group architects & engineers incorporated July 5, 2006 Dan Cornejo, Interim City Planner City of Edina Planning Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Submittal of Application for Final, Development Plan Permit for Rink Properties, LLC for the Addition of a Rigid Membrane Structure as a Permanent Structure 7300 West Bush Lake Road Dear Mr. Comejo, Enclosed are the following items as parts of an application for Final Development Plan Permit for the above named project. 1. Completed Application Form dated May 10, 2006. 2. Check for $750 for the Final Development Plan Permit Fee. 3. Drawings as follows showing both the existing site and building. Drawings include , site survey, site plan, landscape plan, floor plan, exterior elevations, and detailed information on the proposed building addition structural system and exterior finish surface. 4. This cover letter which delineates specific requests for the Final Development Plan Permit, and background material and information about the organization developing the hockey rinks. HISTORY OF THE PERMITTING PROCESS FOR THIS SPECIFIC PROJECT AND REASON FOR THIS PARTICULAR SUBMITTAL In January of 2006, Rink Properties, LLC, submitted an application and was granted approval for a Final Development Plan Permit for remodeling and expanding the existing building at 7300 West Bush Lake Road for use as a hockey training facility. The project included two indoor hockey rinks and required support facilities. (Edina Planning Department file number for the original project is P- 06 -02.) In March of 2006, Rink Properties, LLC, submitted an application and was granted approval for two variances for the property and project located at 7300 West Bush Lake Road. Variance Number one was a request for allowing spectator seating of 250 persons for each of the two rinks. Variance Number Two was request to allow the construction of a third ice rink on the property in a temporary air supported fabric dome structure to be located south of the building over what is now parking lot. (Edina Planning Department Minnesota Missouri 22770 Imperial Avenue N Forest Lake, Minnesota 55025 3242 West Windward Pass Springfield, Missouri 65810 Phone 651 -464 -3756 Fax 651- 464.3794 Email info @dennisbatty.com Phone 417 -889 -8540 Fax 417- 889 -1644 Email info ®dennisbatty.com Internet www.dennisbatty.com Internet www.dennisbatty.com Dan Cornejo, City of Edina July 5, 2006 Page 2 file number for the variance application is B- 06 -19.) This second variance for the third rink was submitted with our understanding that the structure had to be temporary structure. At the time of the application, this was acceptable with Rink Properties since their plan was to ultimately replace the temporary structure with a permanent structure as soon as it was ecumenically feasible for them. The problem arose with the temporary structure when we it was pointed out to us in the building code (IBC & IFC) that one set of rules and limitations applied to the structure if it was a temporary structure and a second set of rules applied to the same structure if it was classified as a permanent structure. The issue for Rink Properties had to do mainly with the larger required separation from the existing building for the third rink structure if it was classified as a temporary structure. What we discovered was that, from a building and fire code stand point, we could build almost exactly the same structure, classify it as a permanent structure as the code does allow, and end up with a substantially smaller required separation-between the existing and proposed third rink structure. This would allow Rink Properties to build a third rink in the location on the site over which they would ultimately be able to build a permanent structure in the future that would be of the ideal size a proportion for the hockey training facility envisioned. One other statement needs to be made about the temporary verses permanent status of the proposed structure. It is the intent of Rink Properties to build a permanent structure over the third rink regardless of how it would be initially classified. The only reason we are back here it this time is to request the permanent status of the structure so that Rink Properties can build the requested third rink with less required setback to the existing adjacent building. REQUEST FOR A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT Rink Properties, LLC is requesting approval to allow the adding of an additional hockey rink to be housed in a fabric membrane enclosed steel frame structure beside the existing building at 7300 West Bush Lake Road. A separate FDP was recently submitted by Rink Properties and approved by the City of Edina for converting the existing building on the site for use as a for use as two hockey rinks and required support facilities. Construction has recently begun on that portion of the project. The property at 7300 West Bush Lake Road is currently zoned Planned Industrial Development (P.I.D.). Current Edina zoning ordinances allow hockey rinks in the P.I.D. The primary use of the membrane covered structure will be a hockey training and practice facility. No spectator seating is being proposed as a part of this facility. The projected occupant load of the building as it is being proposed will not exceed 100 persons. The existing parking lot contains 315 parking spaces. 95 of those spaces will be removed to make way for the proposed third ice rink leaving a total of 220 spaces, which includes Dan Cornejo, City of Edina July 5, 2006 Page 3 6 handicap spaces. A detailed analysis of the proposed use of the building as well as the projected parking and toilet requirements is described in detail in an attached letter to Steve Kiehn, the building official for the City of Edina. PHYSICAL DESRIPTION OF PROPOSED ADDITION The proposed addition of the third ice rink will be housed in a 120' wide by 220' long membrane and rigid steel frame structure to be constructed over the existing south parking lot. The proposed structure will have a gabled roof. The height 'of the proposed addition will be 35' at the ridge and 17' at the eave. The entire exterior surface of the proposed addition, including walls and roof will be a Teflon coated insulated vinyl membrane fastened to a rigid steel frame. The building will be fully fire sprinklered. Sprinkler piping, lighting and HVAC ductwork will all be suspended from the rigid steel frame structure. See attached detailed information concerning the proposed building addition structural system and exterior surface material. It is our understanding that a variance is required for the exterior building material of the proposed addition since it does not match or blend with the building materials of the adjacent existing building. We are hereby requesting that variance. The existing parking lot will be leveled and completely covered by the proposed addition. The floor elevation of the proposed addition will match the floor level of the existing building. No changes are proposed in the grades of the site except under the proposed building addition where the grades will be adjusted to provide a flat building pad for the proposed structure. No change is proposed in the existing site drainage. RESPONSE TO YOUR JUNE 8, 2006 LETTER The following is an item by item response to your June 8, 2006 letter and the location of the specific information you requested. a. A boundary survey, prepared by a registered land surveyor, showing the entire outline, dimensions and area of the property to which the petition relates, and any existing structures, easements, water bodies, watercourses or flood plains. A recently completed boundary survey of the entire site is included as part of this application. It contains all of the information listed above as applicable. There are no water bodies, watercourses, or flood plains on the property. b. All existing structures, uses, rights of way widths and traveled widths of all streets and alleys located within 100 ft of the perimeter of the property. Drawing V 1.0, included as part of this application, shows all existing structures, uses, rights of Dan Comejo, City of Edina July 5, 2006 Page 4 way widths -and traveled widths of all streets and alleys located within 100 ft of the perimeter of the property. c. The location, general exterior dimensions, height and elevation (drawings) of all existing and proposed structures, information on the design and construction of the proposed addition, including interior and exterior building materials, and approximate gross floor area of non - residential buildings. The information requested in this item is shown on drawings V 1.0, V2.0, & V3.0. The location and exterior overall dimensions are'shown on drawing V 1.0. The floor plan with overall dimensions and approximate floor area is shown on sheet V2.0. The exterior elevations of the existing building and proposed addition and identification of building materials is shown on drawing V3.0. A copy of the construction drawings of the current remodeling project to the existing structure that is currently in the works are included in this application which detailed information on the building materials of the existing building. The proposed addition will have an exposed painted steel structure visible only on the interior of the structure. The steel structure is covered on the roof and walls with a Teflon coated insulated vinyl fabric. This stretched vinyl fabric is visible on both the interior and exterior of the structure. d. The locations, dimensions and design features of all proposed streets, driveways, vehicular entrances and exits, driveway intersections with streets, parking areas, loading areas, maneuvering areas and sidewalks, together with dimensions and locations of all existing and proposed public and private easements. All of the applicable information requested in this item is shown either on the site survey or drawing V 1.0. There are no new proposed streets, driveways, vehicular entrances and exits, driveway intersections with streets, parking areas, loading areas, or maneuvering areas proposed as part of this project. A small section of sidewalk is being added on the east side of the proposed addition and a fire lane is being added down the south side of the proposed addition at the direction of the fire marshal. Both are shown on drawing V 1.0. e. A landscape plan and schedule in accordance with Subsection 85030. See drawing L 1.0 for the landscape plan and schedule. f. A general overall grading plan indicating final final grades and directions and destination of surface drainage. General grading and surface drainage are shown on drawing V 1.0, the site survey drawing and the working drawings of the remodeling project of the existing building. No changes are proposed in the site grading and drainage except for the formation of the building pad for the proposed addition which is to be located over the existing south parking lot. The only change to the site drainage as it relates to the storm sewer and water run off from the roof of the proposed structure will be that the existing storm water inlet on the south edge of the parking lot where the building is to be located will be raised and extended to pick up the run off from the proposed fire lane. Water from the roof will run down on to the fire lane and then into the storm sewer inlet. A second storm water inlet will be added on the north side of the proposed Dan Comejo, City of Edina July 5, 2006 Page 5 structure. Finish grade between the building will be sloped to the new inlet and will pick up the water run off from the north half of the building roof. g. Location of all existing, and preliminary layout and design of all proposed water mains, sanitary sewers, drainage facilities and storm sewers, together with dimensions and locations of all existing and proposed public and private easements. All existing utilities and easements, including sewer, water, and storm sewer are shown on the enclosed site survey. No changes or additions are proposed to the site utilities as a part of this project. h. One variance is being requested a part of this application. That is variance for the exterior building material to be used on the proposed third rink structure. The same material is to be used on both roof and walls of the proposed structure. The material will be a insulated Teflon coated fiberglass material that will be stretched between rigid metal trusses that are spaced about 10' on center. The exterior of the building will have a monolithic appearance. The fabric will be a light tan color. When submitting a request for variance, response to the following four questions is required. Our response is as follows. Relieve an undue hardship which was not self imposed or a mere inconvenience. It is hard to know just how to respond to this item. The City of Edina allows the construction and use of temporary and permanent buildings that are fabric covered, yet they require a variance for building additions that are of a different material than the original structure. Our intent through the use of color is to blend the two structures together as much as possible. Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property, but not. applicable to other property, in the vicinity or zoning district. Again it is difficult to know just how this statement might apply to this request for variance. It seems to us that if the particular zoning allows the use of a particular building type such as hockey rinks that it should allow the type of structures and materials that you might typically use for that use, even in the original zoning. Preserve a substantial property right possessed by other property in the vicinity and zoning district. We believe that the use of this type of structure is very logical in the P.I.D. zoning. We believe this would be true of any other hockey rink proposed in this particular zoning district anywhere in the City of Edina. Not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the vicinity or zoning district. a « v Dan Comejo, City of Edina July 5, 2006 Page 6 We believe that using a Teflon coated fiberglass building material for the exterior finish in a permanent or temporary structure would not be in any way detrimental or injurious to this location. The temporary structure would not be out of character in this neighborhood. BACKGROUND INFORMATION FOR RINK PROPERTIES, LLC AND MINNESOTA MADE HOCKEY Minnesota Made Hockey is the leading training and development program for youth hockey in the State of Minnesota. With the purchase of this property and the construction of the proposed facility, it is the vision of the principals of Rink Properties, LLC and Eighty Eight Rinks, LLC, Bernie McBain, Steve Mularky, and Michael Palm, to create a world class hockey training facility at this location. For over 13 years it has been the mission of Minnesota Made Hockey to train and develop hockey players beyond the programs that are currently being offered through the local school and association programs. The need for the professional training and development of the hockey player from early ages is vital to the long term success of not only the player but also the stature of Minnesota hockey on the international stage. A training and development center at this location will provide convenience and easy accessibility to hockey families from all over the Twin Cities area, and will be the home of Minnesota Made Hockey. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. If you have questions or need additional information please contact me. tennis Batty, AIA Db /dlb Enc. June20, 2006 The Dennis Batty & Associates Group architects & engineers incorporated Steve Kiehn, Commercial Plan Reviewer Building Department City of Edina 4801 West 50'x' Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Re: Rational for Restroom Size and Number of Parking Spaces Minnesota Made Ice Rinks Project 7300 Bush Lake Road Dear Steve, This letter is a response to rational you asked us to provide for both the number of plumbing fixtures we have proposed to provide for the above project and the same for the number of parking spaces being provided. We have done two things to assist us in our analysis. The first is to do a proposed usage schedule for the building which lists the number of persons that would be in the building at any one time. The second is that we have done some checking on the number of plumbing fixtures and parking spaces provided at the existing Breamar Arena and the Bloomington Ice Gardens Arenas. The following is a summary of that information. The first chart below identifies the various activities that will take place within the building and the number of occupants /participants for each activity. Minnesota Missouri 22770 Imperial Avenue North Forest Lake, MN 55025 Phone 651464 -3756 Fax 651464-3794 Email info @dennisbatty.com 3242 West Windward Pass Springfield, Missouri 65810 Phone 417.889 -8540 Fax 417. 889.8544 Email info @dennisbatty.com C 1 1 June20, 2006 The Dennis Batty & Associates Group architects & engineers incorporated Steve Kiehn, Commercial Plan Reviewer Building Department City of Edina 4801 West 50'x' Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Re: Rational for Restroom Size and Number of Parking Spaces Minnesota Made Ice Rinks Project 7300 Bush Lake Road Dear Steve, This letter is a response to rational you asked us to provide for both the number of plumbing fixtures we have proposed to provide for the above project and the same for the number of parking spaces being provided. We have done two things to assist us in our analysis. The first is to do a proposed usage schedule for the building which lists the number of persons that would be in the building at any one time. The second is that we have done some checking on the number of plumbing fixtures and parking spaces provided at the existing Breamar Arena and the Bloomington Ice Gardens Arenas. The following is a summary of that information. The first chart below identifies the various activities that will take place within the building and the number of occupants /participants for each activity. Minnesota Missouri 22770 Imperial Avenue North Forest Lake, MN 55025 Phone 651464 -3756 Fax 651464-3794 Email info @dennisbatty.com 3242 West Windward Pass Springfield, Missouri 65810 Phone 417.889 -8540 Fax 417. 889.8544 Email info @dennisbatty.com Steve Kiehn June 20, 2006 Page 2 PROJECTED USE OF BUILDING Support Team & Event /Configuration Spectators Personnel Coaches Officials Total Building during regular hours of operation W/o hockey practice or game- 0 5 0 0 5 Practice With one hockey practice One team- 8 5 20 0. 33 With one hockey practice Two teams or two hockey practices one team- 16 5 40 0 61 With two hockey practices Two teams each- 32 5 80 0 117 Games One hockey game- 250* 5 40* 3 293* Two hockey games- 500* 5 80* 6 591 * Majority of hockey team members will be will be under -age children driven to the game /practice,by an adult/parent that may remain as a spectator or simply drop team member off. The purpose for providing this much detail is to underscore the fact the building will primarily be used as a practice facility and that games will be the exception rather than the rule for activity within the building. About 80% of the usable time has already been booked for use by various entities for training and practice. Further, in many cases, the coaches, team managers, and instructors are parents of the player /team members, thus they come in the same vehicles to the arena. The following is an analysis and comparison of both the parking spaces and the plumbing fixture counts for the existing Braemar Ice Arenas and the Bloomington Ice Gardens, and the proposed Minnesota Made Ice Arenas. Steve Kiehn June 20, 2006 Page 3 PLUMBING FIXTURE ANALYSIS & COMPARISON No. of Spectator Parking Spaces/ No. of WC Urin/ Location Rinks Seating Cap. Spaces Seat Ratio WC & Urn. Seat Ratio Braemar 3 4880 542 1-9.0 47 1-104 Bloomington Ice Gardens 3 2746 331 1-8.3 43 1-63 Minnesota Made Ice 2 500 323 1-1.5 18* 1 —27* Ratios if a 3`d rink were added to Minnesota Made Ice 3 500 220 1-2.3 18* 1— 27* The plumbing fixture numbers represent all plumbing fixtures in the building. If the calculation is based only on the number of fixtures in the main set of restrooms, (12), the ratio drops to 1— 42,. which is still well below the ratio of the two existing hockey arenas used for comparison. You cah see that in both parking space and plumbing fixture ratio to spectator seating (for the proposed Minnesota Made Ice Arenas) will substantially exceed those that are in place for the two existing arenas, actually by more than a factor of two. Even if a third sheet of ice were added to the Minnesota Made Ice Arenas and the number of parking spaces reduced by 103 to make way for the third rink, the ratios still remain favorable and well below those of the two existing rinks. As you know we are in the process of submitting a Final Development Plan Application to the Planning Department for the addition of a third rink. The third rink will only be used for practice and will have no spectator seating. Therefore it will have minimal additional load placed on the restrooms proposed for the two -rink facility. No additional toilets will be proposed as a part of the application for adding the third rink. As you can see from the chart above that the toilet ratio even with the third rink added is much more favorable than that of either Braemar or Bloomington Ice Gardens. Not part of the current application but also part of the proposed future plans, Minnesota Made Ice will be proposing to add an academy for grades three through eight on the mezzanine level of the building. Additional toilets and exits will be added to the building so that the upper level can stand on its own for required restroom/plumbing fixture counts and exits. Plans will be submitted showing the required restrooms at the time approval is requested for the proposed academy addition. Steve Kiehn June 20, 2006 Page 4 Thank you for the opportunity of allowing us to present our rational for sizing the toilets as we have for the proposed Minnesota Made Ice Arena building. Our hope is that this information will assist you in finalizing your review of the plans and issuing a building permit for the entire project. If you have questions or need additional information, please 9feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Dennis Batty, AIA The Dennis Batty & Associates Group, Inc., Architects DB /dlb Copies to: Mike Palm Steve Mularky A MINUTES OF PREVIOUS RINK PROPERTIES 7300 BUSH LAKE ROAD REQUESTS AND APPROVALS . Zoning Board: April 6, 2006 . City Council: February 21, 2006 Zoning Board Minutes April 6, 2006 Mr. Fischer asked Ms. Aaker if a proponents can r apply for greater variance. Ms. Aaker respo/ndedn affirmative. Contin ng, Mr. Fischer told th e proponents they can aoard's decision to a City Council. Mr. Fischer reiterated he beliehip exists on the smaller lots and he would support a greater vaadded a drive � y width between 9 and 10 feet would make sense to e it wouldn't b out of character with the neighborhood. B -04 -19 Rink properties, LLC 7300 Bush Lake Road Request: Variance to allow spectator seating and a variance to allow a temporary fabric dome structure Ms. Aaker informed the Board the subject property is located west of Bush Lake Road and consists of the old Northwest Tennis Club facility located at 7300 Bush-lake-Road. The building was in the process of being remodeled to accommodate the Fellowship of Kings Church. The church has suspended construction activity on the site. Ms. Aaker explained the City Council approved a Final Development Plan submitted by Rink Properties, LLC on February 21, 2006, to allow the existing Tennis Club site and building to be remodeled, converted and added -on to for the use as two hockey rinks with the required support facilities. The facility would be home to the Minnesota Made Hockey program, a training and development program for youth hockey in Minnesota. The plan consists of expanding the structure footprint by 9, 989 sq ft to in -fill the south east corner of the building. A 4,142 sq ft addition was proposed on the second floor for unoccupied space along with a small addition to the west side for mechanical /refrigeration equipment. The hockey training facility is a permitted use in the PID Zoning District, although no spectator seating is allowed within the PID Zoning District. At the time of Final Development Plan approval, no spectator seating had been proposed. A Final Development Plan is reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council if floor area of an existing building increases by 10% or more. The two rink proposal approved by both the Planning Commission and City Council also did not include the temporary dome for a seasonal third rink. A temporary structure is not part of the permanent building and does not increase permanent floor area so it must be reviewed by the Zoning Board of Appeals as a variance request. 7 Zoning Board Minutes April 6, 2006 Ms. Aaker said at this time the proponents are requesting a variance to allow spectator seating not to exceed 500 people, (250 persons for each of the two rinks in the building). The plans for the existing building presented and approved by the Council will not change with the exception of spectator seating. Ms. Aaker noted the proponents are also requesting a variance to allow a third rink to be located in a temporary air supported fabric dome structure to be . located in the south parking area. A "temporary" structure according to the building code may not exceed 6 months and it is anticipated that the dome will be erected in the fall and taken down in the spring to comply with building code. A temporary structure is technically not allowed in the PID Zoning District given that building materials are prescribed by code with no provision to allow fabric domes. The temporary dome will not provide spectator seating and will be used for practice and training. Ms. Aaker concluded staff supports the request subject to the plans presented. Mr. Dennis Batty was present representing Rink Properties. Mr. Schwartzbauer said he thinks this request is a bit unusual and asked Ms. Aaker if a variance would be required each time the dome was deflated and re- inflated. Ms. Aaker responded approval of this variance would allow the continued seasonal use of the dome without being reheard. Mr. Fischer told the Board he remembers this proposal very well and asked Mr. Batty what changed from the time the Commission heard this to now with regard to spectator seating. Continuing, Mr. Fischer stated he distinctly remembers the question of spectator seating being asked at the Commission level and at that time the response was there would be no spectator seating, reiterating, what changed? Mr. Batty responded at the time of Final Development Plan a decision was made to streamline this request as much as possible by not including spectator seating in the plan. Mr. Batty said it was felt the application would be "muddied" if that were added. Mr. Fischer stated at the Commission level he was very supportive of the request for converting this parcel to accommodate an ice sheet; however, at this time he has a problem because the Commission voted the request "up" on what was presented to them and now that has changed. What was presented to the Commission in the form of a Final Development Plan in no way resembles what is presented to the Board this evening. Concluding Mr. Fischer said if the proponent knew from the beginning he wanted these options it would have been 93 Zoning Board Minutes April 6, 2006 better if the "whole package" was presented to the Commission and the Council. It should have all been done at once, not piecemeal. Mrs. Vasaly agreed. She said the impression this gives is unsettling. Mr. Fischer stated while he may not have a problem with this proposal and the land use the process the applicant decided to take is procedurally difficult. Mr. Fischer reiterated he wishes this request would have been included in the Final Development Plan. Mr. Fischer asked if the adjoining neighbors were informed of this request. Ms. Aaker responded in the affirmative. Mrs. Vasaly asked Mr. Fischer if he believes this proposal would have changed the outcome of the Plan ning'Commission meeting. Mr. Fischer responded he doesn't really know. He said his understanding was most Commissioners felt is was unusual that spectator seating wasn't included in the Final Development Plan, adding in his opinion most Commissioners felt spectator seating would be added sometime in the future, however, he is hesitant to speak for other Commissioners. Commissioner Fischer acknowledged he would have supported the Final Development Plan, (including the requests this evening) if everything would have been presented to the Commission at one time, adding he; has a difficult time believing the proponent didn't realize spectator seating is an important aspect of ice arenas. Mrs. Vasaly reiterated she doesn't like this process - it is unsettling. Mr. Fischer said his concern is also how the Council will react to this. Ms. Aaker stated the City Council set up the Zoning Board to make these types of decisions independent of them. Continuing, Ms. Aaker explained if any changes to the footprint of the building(s) are requested that would trigger a Final Development Plan which would require a public hearing before both the Commission and Council. Ms. Aaker said the zoning variance file can be placed in the Final Development Plan file for the site. This would ensure if there is another expansion request for this site all minutes, including the minutes of this meeting would be passed on to both the Commission and Council. Mr. Fischer moved variance approval noting he doesn't believe a deliberate attempt was made by the proponent to hide the fact they would be requesting spectator seating, adding parking won't be an issue for this site, parking is adequate. Mrs. Vasaly seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. B -06 -20 Ann and T d Olsol 5505 Wo crest D ve Lot 3, B ck 3, S dy Pines Addition 66] Minutes/Edina City Council/February 21, 2006 Nays: Hulvil Masica Motion r' d. RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -24 ADOPTED GRANTING FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN - RINK PROPERTIES (7300 BUSH LAKE ROAD) Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen said the proponent, Rink Properties, LLC, has requested a Final Development Plan to allow the existing Northwest Tennis Club site and building at 7300 Bush Lake Road, to be remodeled and converted for use as two hockey rinks and the required support facilities. He added the proposed conversion to a hockey facility would be a permitted use in the Planned Industrial Zoning District. The building's primary use would be as a hockey training and practice facility. Mr. Larsen said the applicants have indicated the facility would be home to Minnesota Made Hockey, which was a training and development program for youth hockey in the State of Minnesota. Mr. Larsen noted the existing building had been a Northwest Tennis Club and'was in the process of being remodeled for use by the Fellowship of the Kings Church. Rink Properties LLC has proposed to convert the existing structure and expand it to allow two ice sheets, locker rooms, restroom, office and a lobby area. He said the proposed main floor addition would consist of 9,989 square feet and would in -fill the south east corner of the building. A 4; 142 square foot addition of unoccupied space has been proposed to the upper floor of the building. Mr. Larsen noted a small 38 foot by 25 foot addition was proposed to the west side of the building for the mechanical/ refrigeration equipment. He reported that no variances would be necessary for the additions. Mr. Larsen said the facility will be used for hockey training and practice with occasional games played on the rinks. He added that no spectator seating was proposed as part of the plan. Mr. Larsen said the proponents have indicated the maximum occupant load would be 600. He said with existing parking on site at 320 of which'six stalls would be handicapped accessible, parking exceeded ordinance requirements. Mr. Larsen reported the Planning Commission unanimously recommended the City Council grant the requested Final Development Plan. Mike Palm, 5034 Bruce Avenue, explained he was the proponent and that along with Steve Malarky and Bernie McBain, they intended to convert the property at 7300 Bush Lake Road into a hockey player development school. Mr. Palm reported that he had conversations with both the, Edina Hockey Association and the Edina Park Director. Mr. Palm said he and his partners were also looking into the possibility of inviting the Southwest Curling Club into their establishment on one of the rinks. Mr. Palm said that Mr. McBain has in the past been very successful in developing championship hockey teams and showed pictures of several youth who have been taught by Mr. McBain. He said that with the significant increase in girls' athletics there was a tremendous need for more training facilities in the area. Member Masica asked what the partners' previous experience was in running a developmental hockey facility. Mr. Palm replied that while Mr. McBain has run hockey schools for thirteen years they did not have direct experience in running a hockey facility. He added that they have Page 14 Minutes/Edina City Council/February 21, 2006 very reliable contractors and hope to be running their facility by June of 2006 and then later to move to Phase Two which would add classrooms eventually housing a private school for grades two through eight. Mayor Hovland called for public comment. No one appeared to comment. Member Swenson made a motion closing the public hearing, seconded by Member Masica. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson made a motion introducing the following resolution and moving its approval granting the Final Development Plan for Rink Properties - 7300 Bush Lake Road. RESOLUTION NO. 2006-24 APPROVING FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN RINK PROPERTIES 7300 BUSH LAKE ROAD BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain Final Development Plan for 7300 Bush Lake Road presented by Rink Properties LLC, at the regular meeting of the City Council on February 21, 2006, be and is hereby granted Final Development Plan approval. Passed and adopted by the Edina City Council this 21st day of February, 2006. Member Masica seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ADDITION - 6621 NORMANDALE ROAD Affi wits of Noti/aroximately ted, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen explained the subject proper was a developed g lot containing an area of 60,044 square feet. He said the e ' ting home was locely mid lot. Mr. Larsen said the property was accessed b Normandale Road away 100. He said the proponents intended to remove existing house to allow of two new homes on the two separate lots. Mr. Larsen stated the followin ere the median size anrOOFeet ensions of lots within 500 feet of the subject property. Median Lots Parameters Width Depth Area 98.4 feet 174.1 feet 17,573 square feet Lot 1 92.5 feet Lot 2 92.5 feet Mr. Larsen said the two new lots would 367. feet 33,777 square feet 36 8 feet 34,267 square feet d a 5.9 foot lot width variance. Page 15 j Vili-VERNIS BATTY & ASSOCIATES GROUP FOREST LAKE, MINNESOTA _tai 1 ICE RINK THREEE FOR, t MINNESOTA MADE ICE i'- The National Governing Body for the sport of ice hockey February 17, 2006 USA Hockey, Inc. 1775 Bob Johnson Drive Colorado Springs, Colorado 80906 -4090 www.usohockey.com USA Hockey is a member of the International Ice Hockey Federation and the United States Olympic Committee 4 'U5A�r� Player development is not rocket science, but it does take a quality coach that knows what is important for players at each age category. It also takes the ability to teach, and be persistent with the methodology. In all, we have had a staggering, 9 National Team players, all born in 1988 from Minnesota, with whom Bernie played a significant part in their development. These players are not only some of the best in the United States, but are premier players on the world stage. To attest to this, 3 of these players will be in the top 10 picks in this year's NHL Draft, and 1 may even go first overall! I cannot understate how special this is for hockey in this country. What make this so exciting for us at the National level is that what Bernie has done can be replicated! Persistent skill development at those younger ages can't be replaced and Bernie knows how to teach them. We can't wait for his next crop of players. Sincerely, Ken Martel USA .Hockey _ National Team .Development .Program Minnesota Parents and Players: Kerr Martel As someone who has watched and evaluated the top American hockey Coordinator, players, I can state that what Bernie McBain and Minnesota Made Hockey Youth. ice Hockey has accomplished in the area of player development is truly amazing. Our National Teams are generally made up of players spread out from around 719- 576 -USAH, Exi. 181 the country. It is rare that we have even more than a few from the same vicinity that are considered for the team. When we first started to watch the Fax 719-538-1160 1988 birth year, our staff saw early on that there was a special group from Minnesota in that birth year. A group far better and deeper in talent than kenm @usahockey.org any we had seen in recent memory. When we started to look deeper at this group, the common thread was Bernie McBain. USA Hockey, Inc. 1775 Bob Johnson Drive Colorado Springs, Colorado 80906 -4090 www.usohockey.com USA Hockey is a member of the International Ice Hockey Federation and the United States Olympic Committee 4 'U5A�r� Player development is not rocket science, but it does take a quality coach that knows what is important for players at each age category. It also takes the ability to teach, and be persistent with the methodology. In all, we have had a staggering, 9 National Team players, all born in 1988 from Minnesota, with whom Bernie played a significant part in their development. These players are not only some of the best in the United States, but are premier players on the world stage. To attest to this, 3 of these players will be in the top 10 picks in this year's NHL Draft, and 1 may even go first overall! I cannot understate how special this is for hockey in this country. What make this so exciting for us at the National level is that what Bernie has done can be replicated! Persistent skill development at those younger ages can't be replaced and Bernie knows how to teach them. We can't wait for his next crop of players. Sincerely, Ken Martel USA .Hockey _ National Team .Development .Program r, LOCATION MAP _ CATCH BASIN ELECTRIC MANHOLE HYDRANT • SET OR FND MONUMENT LIGHT POLE POWER POLE SANITARY MANHOLE 'L STORM MANHOLE rr TELEPHONE BOX r. WATER VALVE -> -. - FENCELINE - GASMAIN - ro -- FIBER OPTIC - . WATERMAIN - -- SANITARY SEWER -- STORM SEWER 1 TELEPHONE LINE D, - - -- OVERHEAD ELECTRIC - _ - ELECTRIC LINE BENCHMARK: TOP NUT OE HYDRANT AT THE EAST SIDE OF BUSH LAKE ROAD AT DEWEY HILL ROAD ELEVATION - 637.28 $Cale in feet 0 50 100 150 r`. I ry I I f I y d pl cam IW L• � 1 U^ '4 N8945'31'W 99.43 :s aW /T� 0%vER. h*ELE ENGINlc,ryNG COMFANI sal SEp.Va .~........ m_ 1 l� I F -1 i I hereby certify to TRADITION CAPITAL BANK, FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, RINK PROPERTIES. LLC, EIGHTY EIGHT RINKS, LLC, AND MINNESOTA MADE HOCKEY, INC. and TNNLD Capital, Inc as follows: that this Is a true and correct surrey of Lots 2 and 3. Block i, Metro U. S. Construction Subdivision, Hennepin County, Minnesota and correctly shows the location of oil existing buildings and structures, and improvements an mid property, and there are no vislT)le encroachments onto adjoining properties, streets or alleys by any of the existing buildings, structures. w improvements: there are no visible rights -of -ways or easemenbs an said described properly other then shown thereon; and there are no party walls w visits encroachmen ts onto said desvibed properly by bindings, structures, or other improvements situated on adjoining property, except as shown on mid survey. This survey was mode (I) in accordance with 'Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA /ACSM Land Title Surveys jokntly established and adopted by ALTA, AGSM and NSPS in 2005 and includes Items 1 -4,6- 8,10.11, 16 -18 of Table A thereof. Pursuant to the Accuracy Standards as adopted by ALTA and NSPS and in effect on the date of this collficolion, undersigned further certifies that in my professional opinion. as o land surveyor registered in the State of Minnesota, the Relative Pmitlan l Accuracy of this s��u--rr'vve�ey does not exceed that which Is specified therein. D. Daniel Thorp, Licensed Surveyor Minnesota Registration No.16321 Date: June 1. 2006 NOTES: 1. This wrvey relies on information found in the commitment for title insurance prepared by Fwet American Title Insurance Company, file no. NCS- 192147 -MPLS, doled April 6, 2006 Amended April 28, 2006. 2. The locations of underground utilities ore based upon available maps, records and field locations. The locations may not be exact. 3. All distance are in feet, 4. The basis of bearings is assumed. 5. The arm of the property described above Is 237,006 savors feet or 5.4409 acres. 6. The property does not Im in a flood ho=ard zone according to the Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate MW Community Panel No. 270160 0005 B. doted May 1, 1980 7. According to the City of Edina zoning web site the property Is currently zoned Planned Industrial District, contact city for approved site plan. 8. There is evidence of earth moving work or construction. 9. There is no evidence of change in street right of ways, sidewalk construction. 10. There Is no observable evidence of site Used os waste dump, sump or sanitary landfill- 11. We we not aware of any wells on the property. 12. Schedule B Items Items 1 -3 Defect., Liens, Disereponcie., Interests none aware of not plotteble m Ite 4 Eozementa not of public record none aware of not plotted Items 5-8 Liens, Taxes. Real Estate Taxes, Special Aseesarnent not plottable. Item 9 Drainage and Utility Easement per plots of Edina Interchange Center Second Addition and Edina Interchange Center Second Addition First Replot as shown an survey. Item 10 Intentionally Blank Item 11 Declaration of Restrictive Covenant Doc No 7798699 Identifies, property but nc plotlable sum given. Item 12 unrecorded leases none aware of not plotted. 13. The parking stripe that ore shown for the benefit of this survey we from available plans. At the lost site visit the final bituminous lift was not completed an the northerly parking lot. ABTA /AGSM LAND TITLE SURVEY 7300 BUSH LAKE ROAD EDINA, MINNESOTA � i Engineers . Surveyors ~� ,e. n 02 000. 1 Landscape Architects - - Hen Thorp Pelinen arson Inc. - - -- a e• -- /O / 1{ 7510 uonn vino. anti ` (951) a 07MFAY�(95i) 0:9-700. I . 7 EXISTINr: 14 I EXISTING SELF STORAGE BUILDING BUSH LAKE ROAD "I Jkl NINE is 7 bLUE _c' EU-E SFl, _E FCC' 14AFLE &L;JE �:TPU' - f 7A 3 E I -TTT-7-7--, -­J 1. L +H NEW J -4-H ADDITION T PROPOSED IM; 11.1 Z4 HOCKEY RINK FABRIC COVERED Z Tl:Kff' RIGID FRAME F STRUCTURE W'h,' FED MAPLE 1 R %P SL FEE, MAPLE _U_-itP ON Ir.3 LmT C� E i Lj X, I - ..PH AL I L—H r T 71 r r t WE PLAN Tj 6, The Dennis Batty & Associates Group architects & enginmn i­"rated PORE�_ l.AICC bfN S.W25 PRONE, 45._3756 FAX *51.4643794 hassol-m 3242 WP WNDUAPDPASS SPRINGFIELD. 6500810 PHONE: 417AA8S1D PAX 4174189 -16M C`06A06_,DN NUDiBab Zmao DATE - PLOT DATL. 7.546 REVISIONS 6A4RV151O� eC W­A- L� �­ '� ,OE 6TAl O .S. POS'_iOFFICE i IST. FACIIITY kNCE REOUEST FOR NESOTA MADE ARENAS BUSH LAKE PC V1.0 I I LLYJ�I� - MAIN FLOOR PLAN -PHASE TWO N 7-9F 1 /I6' _ 1' -6' b — TI' III G The Dennis Batty I Associates Group 3iTA�AV N. FORM LAKE ►iN SSW EMAW PHOIa 6514b 736 PAL 631.163-3794 bnssoum PAL 317!69.16" DRAWN BYE j NUbC3M lmsx >iaVE DAR 639-06 PIOP DA78 I 61906 IREV®Om _ I I I 1117M 61EIIOOf1I�DEP WiE: 1E4 K. 96L VARAMM MQUEST FOR MINNESOTA MADE ICE ARENAS PD99A 611: MAIN FLOOR PLAN - PHASE TWO V2.0 ] E 'S .G ------ PRU..G.m BuL­G F WEST ELEVATION NEW PgEj1NISMEG D HOCKEY RINK DOI%IE STRUC7UR—_ BUILDING I_7 I—, / �/ NUF�URU SC SH[R 4.2 NEW PRLTINISH .9. BUILDING BEYOND BxiECI in R CL SIAM N!kLATIDN 6YG1E': fir: EW[TI+G I I ffiffill EMEi>6 C.— 17 ray' SW PROPOSED HOCKEY RINK — FABRIC COVERED RIGID FRAME STRUCTURE SUPER—IMPOSED OVER EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION Tz - PROPOSED HOCKEY RINK - FABRIC COVERED RIGID FRAME STRUCTURE (2) SOUTH ELEVATION \itYu AN PROPOSED HOCKEY RINK - FABRIC COVERED RIGID FRAME STRUCTURE FROPOHD HOCKEY RINK - FAPRIC COVERED RIGID FRAf,/,E STRU,^TUR7 NEW PRLTINISH .9. BUILDING BEYOND BxiECI SIAM N!kLATIDN 6YG1E': fir: EW[TI+G I I ffiffill aw I HIM r_-ET4 DfJSTING PREF LDING INISHED M BUI WMAKE FIE1011JE8T FOR ICE ARENAS Tz - aria FJILD n: -1-1 R_ B—..FF G­ III—< -`L4 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS M!In.- C­ -,I `7-1 - PHASE TWO Nm C C. a DOOR rRWE AND.*II.0 NORTH ELEVATION 7.0 ot I.- IMEIR l MoRa. I,• WILD G., C�RiMED C.3 G-11 EAST ELEVATION FROPOHD HOCKEY RINK - FAPRIC COVERED RIGID FRAf,/,E STRU,^TUR7 Do ,---TEXIS C TI UILD I.c - PR[n, G CMJ xp- The Dennis Ratty & Associates Group 27770D4,E7lALAvw;W%l. FORM LAM )IN 55025 PAL 651A61 -]'A1 PAL 4174,%`Iw DRAWN BTj 0010• N Ummall, 6.2946 1111VIR01ml NEW PRLTINISH .9. BUILDING BEYOND SIAM fir: EW[TI+G I I ffiffill aw I HIM r_-ET4 DfJSTING PREF LDING INISHED M BUI WMAKE FIE1011JE8T FOR ICE ARENAS 7" aria FJILD n: -1-1 R_ B—..FF G­ III—< -`L4 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS M!In.- C­ -,I `7-1 - PHASE TWO Nm C C. a DOOR rRWE AND.*II.0 NORTH ELEVATION 7.0 Do ,---TEXIS C TI UILD I.c - PR[n, G CMJ xp- The Dennis Ratty & Associates Group 27770D4,E7lALAvw;W%l. FORM LAM )IN 55025 PAL 651A61 -]'A1 PAL 4174,%`Iw DRAWN BTj 0010• N Ummall, 6.2946 1111VIR01ml V3.0 SIAM aw r_-ET4 DfJSTING PREF LDING INISHED M BUI WMAKE FIE1011JE8T FOR ICE ARENAS 7" Bus. M. L� M EDIN k -1-1 R_ B—..FF G­ III—< -`L4 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ip4K7=D ey wou I - PHASE TWO V3.0 PLANT 5111NEIDULE Z-AETNG jLCK P'.1—Z 6TNV E L L" 5=r ^JLE =-A7.TlW- E L ZZ_d- TREE YF EN FLAN'TE -------- - - - LI k=-u TREE ifE F1,1141T 'CHEr-tl-E FOF. T. Rc A4, SIB BUSH LAKE ROAD - 11 1 LNE l4i BLUE -FRU,.[ '01 BLUE ij'RIJCE --jTj 7 I IT��`_ll 12" R9 WPLE PROPOSED I 2-4 F 'C' "'PLF HOCKEY RINK FABRIC COVERED RIGID FRAME STRUCTURE A E0'TTI(,�, PLFi H- L -j Et: L 50, ✓. S Ml9 PAILF.-JM, TT A14 LANDSCAPE PLAN k4GPLE The Dennis Batty & Associates Group a-biwv & enginmn FORrST L--ICE UN 55015 PHONL �-3736 FAX as-37 SPRINGTIO.D. MO 65810 EMAJL- bd.@ mei.b-- MCWL- .1?.88➢-95M FAX 417-069-1651 r. DATE 7-546 LIC MI RENOVATED FACRSTY FOR MINNESOTA MADE ICE ARENAS 7= BUSH LAKE RD EDKk MN LANDSCAPE PLAN L1.0 HERCULES BUILDING 100' X 200' Avil 100' x 200' Hercules Arch Truss - Top Mew Iv WUNIOW yr rooq Page a too- -s a/a° (Out ®Ida of Foot to Oulalde of Foot) • B IN EbIJF6HMANG€ WIT" N@ Nf9AkAT'dNAL 1 COB€: mo €6171@N -OM FOR LIVE WAD: NA 16P L'V-@ L&6r NA idP SNOW 1,609: tbHOUNEI ON6W LbAbi = 0 P §F 1A59UM€ @1 i §N13LA 90fg §UR€ FA 00141 � 1 -5 j §MELT €k €bi IfN €RMAL PA @TORT = 1 i I §OLb HdBti W48W IMPORT ANF€ FA064i = 0 A lchf €00hY Il iFLAf Aii@F §N0* LOAD I =1091 hg §I Ia PO i0'i i 1.31 11.8110 iii moo 16 d §F i§Vb'NI; RUMP ONO LbAI?1= @s Pi I §idP€ FAefbhl =AS §€'tERMIN €D F §N ARFH €ii ROOF§ (§ALAN §Pb ANA UNNALANWED LdAb'NG d6N61TION9 Gf1N §IC €k €Bi (jW BRIPINd PMOM QLJAe €NT OU4 @IN% efRUbfUR €S, 6o ANI H €k HOMO @NTAL §WkFA @ES HAS NOT BEEN WN09M€0 I PR(bA TO @DMM €NGIN@ FABRICATION FOR A 909 @IFI@ SITE, VERIFY IF ANY MODIFICATIONS TO THE STRUCTURE ANOICR FOUNDATION OWN141001 Aft NEFJUIR90 BY THE @IT€ ADAPTATION €NOW9114- 3 f419 1§ A PROTOTYPICAL 0 €919N AND DOCUMENT SET THE @ € §19N AND DEPICTED FA9140f19N, €N €019N, AND FOUNDATION DRAWINGS AAR ONLY VALID FOR fiH€ €1fA§f @ €916N PARAM €T €RA AND @OMNINATI @N§ OF PARAMETERS @ @9UM €NT €O fH9 b € §' @N MUST 9€ OIT€ ADAPTED TO 9P € @IFI@ @R€S. ANY UB€ OF TRIO O €SIGN AND @b @UM @Nf FOR A SPECIFIC SITE REQUIRED: A U €91 631A PARAM €TOR VERIFICATION NY A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL €1,16IN €914, €'KP €WEN9 €0 IN §TRUOTURAL ENGINEERING, VERIFY THAT LOADING CON917101 AND THE 9901R €M€1476 OF THE WE ARE €UAL TO ON LEON THAN THE COGUM9NT €9 BENIGN PANAM€T€R9 ANDI @P COMOINATION OF THE DOCUM €NTEO D € §1 @N PARAMETERS 9 V€AT CATION OP SPECIFIC @'T€ 994 CONDITION& VERIFY THAT THE €91911NO BIT€ SOIL CONDITION§ ARE €OUAL TO OR GREATER THAN THE D0CUM €NT€D 99915N PARAM99R§ ANSI @R @CMBINATIONO @F DOCUM €NT €@ 0 €91 @N PARAMETERS G ANV §IT€ 0991F16 @01,19171 @0 FAILING A ON S WILL N €9UIR9 R €-ANALYSIS OF TH€ NtRU@TUR€ ANION FOUNDATION BY A CERTIFIED 9 €91ON PROF €CBIONAL. FAILURE TO VERIFY TM€ VALIDITY @F TWO PRLION FOR A OF €91FIC 9R €, F9Lk@W€9 by ANY N € @ €§ §ARV RIT9 ADAPTATION MODIFICATION @AN RESULT IN A BANS €ROUR SITUATION, POTENTIALLY R € §ULTINO IN 1€141096 INJURY OR 9 €ATH TO P €RSOND OR A614IC14LTURAL ANIMALS IN OR NEAR THIN STRUCTURE. 3 US@ IN ALL 699P -IND APPLICATIONS: 4 T€N @ION 9ABWO AT TURNSUP49 TO TAU §Hf CONDITION I6TRAIOHT AND NOT @LACK OR LOS@ €): !! 1 REQUIRED MINIMUM NET ALLOWABLE A91L PEARIN@ CAPA9ITY; 8000 POP, R €9UIR €0 MINIMUM @@IL O1D€ FRICTION ON PI €N CIROUMF €R €149 €; 185 09F FOR UPLIFT. 8 TIGHTEN @A0696 9 €9YUNTIA66Y TO AVOID TWIOTIN@ OR C €PORMIN@ STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS DURING €R €@TION: R € @MEGN PR€VIOUNLY TIGHTENER OASL €C UNTIL AFL I 8 O@NTRA9TGR @HALL 6O9AT€ €NISTINO UN99R9R @UNP UTILITI €§ BAKER ACHIEVE TAUGHT OONBITION, B €F @R€ FOUNDATION EXCAVATION A € @IN §. nc�.omm 3 ALL CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION 91,14L 99111FORM WITH LOCAL CUILCINC 099€ REQUIREMENTS AND THE LATEST 1 REFER TO 14€UfIN9 OUI94IN € §' PURNON €9 BY AWED TUBE ANC CONDUIT; HARVEY, €9MON @F'A @I 919, OUILDIN9 @99€ R €9UIR €M €NT6 ILLINCI §, FOR R €90MM €N9 €9 PROCESSES AND PRACTICES FOR W €1,91NO 94VAN1999 FOR §TRUOTURAL G0N @R €T €' @T € €L TUNINO: WELDS SMALL SHOW UNIFORM S €OTION, OMOOTHN €00 OF WELD M €TAO FR € €D9M FROM POROSITY AND OLINN €RB, AND AG €OUAT€ STRENGTH AND DURABILITY, ALL W €LOO NOT CTM €RWI §€ IDENTIFIED ONALL IF CONTINUOUS: ALL PROP W €LDINO 19 TO O€ 99149 BY CERTIFIED OP €RATORB (T€ §T POSITION AF AND OF WITH PIPE 19 MINIMUM R€OUIR €00 €RTIFICATION(, ALL W€LDINO OHALL B€ IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION @F AWO'9O9€ FOR W €L@ING IN @WILDING @@NRTRUOTI @N': v@ bE §ION BATA! IM €THOS 8. ANALViI @AL 121110@ 00€ eAs :§ WIND §P € €§i a W MPH iA §SUM9§) pfiEE1.I 1 AFT €R @HOP FABRICATION, TOUCH-UP ALL W €LDS, A9RAD €D AREAS AND SCRATCHER [WIND b'k € §iIONAUfV FA §TOAI i 0 09 jAR §M €b 0DOF) WITH @OLD OALVANI €IN@ COMPOUND CONRIOT€NT WITH GALVAN1490 TUBE WND MPORTAN0€ F43TOPI = ii Ai itAT €tldRv I) 1 ALA: §fRUOTUPAL §T € €L TURINO 9HAL: §€ OALVANIA €D, YIELD CTR €N0TM-901191 1 MANUFACTY01914 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR @OL@R AND COMP @5If1ON- PRIOR TO €kPb§UkF FAf€Odfl l i @ (A01I.Wbl a €bTiON 0019P €RTT1€9; 9991SN VALU €S, AND OALVAM€INS PROTECTION SHALL MEET TOUra"P, CLEAN W€LD €9 ANN ABRADED AREAS WITH A WIN€ 99YOM TO REMOVE iii IINT PR €9 @Ij€FF 1: a -0 99 (f AH11ALLv €N §Lei § €01 ON €M@ € €D 9TRU§TURA6 TURING MANUFACTURER BY Akio@ TUBE AND 9ONOUITi @LAO N9 L@9 99 PART196% BURFA9 €6 MURT 6€ 4EAN AND OIL FR €€ 1 €Nf PH €S 000E I °- A§ b @f €kMIN €B FOR A04b RUMP6 YARN €Y: ILLIN @I§ _ 8 AFTER FIELD INSTALLATION, TOUO"P ALL ABRA9€9 AR€AD, 99RATWM €6, F19LD u € §16N WIND PA€ §OUR €) - 3 OTRUOfURAL STEEL SHAKO AND PLATER OHALL COMPLY WITH ANTM All OR €@UAL, W €LDO, D0LT9O 90NN €GTiGND AND ATTA @HM €NTO WITH O9L0 94VANIBING PFRS MAA WIND PR €91JUNt tKEPT AN NOTED: STRUCTURAL @T€ €L OHAP €O AND PLATS ARE TO 6€ OHOP PRIM € - COMPOUND OF THE CAME GOMPOSITION AND GOWN USED FOR SHOP @@ATIN% 19 9 P§F INWAAb, z@ + P91i" OUTWAR€ §OAT @9 WITH 9 @0 OALVANIBIN@ COMPOUND. APPLY SHOP PRIME GOAT TO OBTAIN A MPON €Ht's ANB @LADB1Nd W 146 PM €SSUd€ NA UNIFORM ORt F4M THI@NN€ P, OF NOT LEON THAN 8 MILN- BABDTIBN AND 61PLD QUfiLITY D9NTRI�LI vb §F €EB-UP EFFECT€ AT Itl6tAfEb HILL& A1§6€S, ANB 3 ALL 9OLT€D §9NN €@T+9N9 §HALL USE A389 ROLT§ 9F DIAMETERS MBI@AT€9 ON PLANS 1 THE €R €CTOR IC 01€9PON919L€ FOR 9 €919NING AND FURNIONIN9 ALL TEMPORARY U'ARPM €NT'§ @6N'9TuMINd ABRWPf GL14N599 IN I HE 63 N €NAL 990§ NEED ONLY BE T1OMTN €9 TO TM@ @NU@•TIOMT OONDITION• fiH€ §NU@•TI §HT BRACING, 6110RIN9, ANW9R OUPPORT THAT MAY 9€ R €9UIR €@ AD THE R €OULT OF ai3S11AHV HAW NOT 99PN 6 @NNIb €N €§ WNIJ ZION I§ DEFIN €@ A@ THE TI @NTN €AN ATTAINED NY A FEW IMPACTS OF AN IMPACT €R €GT91il 991,19TRUCfl@N M€TH999 ANDI0R SEQUENCES. THE STRUCTURE 19 WN @N §H; dR THE FULL EFFORT OF A MAN USING AN ORDINARY SPUD WR €N @M 0 €919N €0 TO FUNCTION AD A UNIT UPON @9MPL€T1CN: THE STRUCTURAL €NOIN € €R HTMOUAAE 6 € §,@N DATA; NA A6OUM €9 NO LLA911,I1Y FOR THE STRUCTURE DURING €R €OTION. H €b fRU§9E§ ARE D €9'6N €0 -fib AL @OMMODATE L'MIfF6 AWIT ONAL s.661 f1ONAL WAG& 9UGM A9 POP LIeHf Nd. HEATING. AND V €NT4ATIM NF, SMALL NOT €ldtEb le0 LA§ PER A§ § €M §L €b AA@NEb fRUs§; TH€ WAI'ff €N APPROVAL §F fiH€ D€ @1814 €Ns1N €Ek LGA6 §SHALL 6E Af i�AN €L "dB'Nr61P0'NTC OF @ONTO §f 6ETW € €N TPW99 W €C ANB AND 90ALL 09 b'9fA19Uf90 §O fhkt N© MORE MAN v9 Lot Ii i €b FROM ANV § N§L€ Lb @AfldN P OF 6t € €L Tit %P OF 6LA9 OALV OALVANIEED UNBAf10N €L ELVATION AND ROUND 4 ALL §tRUCTURAL'STE €L 19 TO It FAORI@ATD IN A99GR9AN9€ WT14 THE LATEST €61T ON OF AI § @'€P €9F CATION FOR THE O €SIGN, FABRICATION AND €R €91PON OF STRUCTURAL STEEL FOR OUILDINOC•' 1 ALL CA §L€ SMALL %§ OALVANI€€B ST €L, MULTIPURPOSE, F N 1B @LAGS STRAND @9R€ §OHM €N@IAL 9RAO €, CF DIAM€TN INDI@ATI� i MAE ROPE @LIAR ONALL It INSTALLED MAINTAININO MINIMUM CABLE TURN9AGN L€N614 NOfEb ON PLAN& INSTALL U•9O0 OF WIR€ POPE @UP ON VEAB' OR ONORT €NB @F fhABm ANN THE SA @CL€ ON TH€ %w OR LONG END OF To@ GAOL€ NO OPENING (OT14€14 THAN THIGH ONOWN ON THE DRAWINGS) ONALL 9€ MADE IN ANY 9TRUOTURAL M €M9 €N, AND NO M@OIFICATTON OR ALTPAT19N SMALL 9€ MADE TO ANY STRUCTURAL MEMBER ON 9ONN €9TI@N WR K9UT TIME WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE 0€91014 ENGINEER: MINIMUM TW €NTY:€19HT DAY §TP €N9TH FOR ALL RTRUCTURAL CONGR €T€ FP @TINS§, WALLN, AND P19R§ SHALL of 9000 PRI ALL @ONOR €T€ REINFORCING §T € €L 16 TO 99 A §TM A -@ 19, 9RA@€ §O: LAP9 SMALL 0E 40 OAR 91AM€T€NO ALL ANCHOR 9O1,76 ARE TO 0€ 814' DIA: OALVANI€€D OR A30T DOLTS, UNL€99 NOTED 0TH €RWIO€ BTRWOTURAL FOUNDATIONS @HALL BE 999ION €9 ANB 99NOTRUCT €D TO R €GIST U M9C AND ARAOT19N§ FROM MOST 9€RHE LOADINO COMBINATION€, AD NOTED ON TH€ PLANK. R' 16 PR €CUM99 THAT F @UNCAFl9N@IBTRU9TUR €6 WILL B€ CONSTRUCTED ON A LEVEL SURFACE: IN NO CARE SHALL A F9UNDATIONIPTOUOTUR9 SLOPE WITH TERRAIN UNLEB§ §P € @IFIfiALLY APPROV€9 IN WRITING NY THE DESIGN ENGINEER REPORURE C OMMENDATI ON To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item III.A. From: GORDON L. HUGHES Consent ❑ CITY MANAGER Information Only ❑ Date: AUGUST 15, 2006 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: ORDINANCE NO. 2006-5 - AN El . Motion ORDINANCE AMENDING ❑ Resolution SECTION 1.235 PROVIDING ® Ordinance FOR TEMPORARY ❑ Discussion PARKING PERMITS RECOMMENDATION: Grant First Reading. INFORMATIONBACKGROUND: Several months ago the City Council granted Final Development Plan approval for the 5000 . France Avenue retail /condominium project at 50`h and France. During the course of the Council's consideration, the applicant, Mr. Gene Haugland, pointed out that current City Ordinances restrict overnight parking in the municipal parking ramps. In that the parking ramps may be used on occasion by visitors and guests of occupants of 5000 France, it was suggested that the City amend its Ordinance in order to allow such individuals to use the ramp for overnight parking. Staff has prepared Ordinance No. 2006.5 which amends Section 1235 of the City Code to provide for the issuance of such temporary permits. The proposed Ordinance amendment suggests that such permits may be issued only to guests and visitors of occupants of residential dwellings in the 50`h & France area and that such permits may not be issued for not more than 14 days per vehicle. REPORT /RECOMMENDATION - Ordinance Amendment No. 2006 -5 August 15, 2006 Page two The Ordinance also provides that the City Manager may prescribe the locations within the , municipal parking ramps where vehicles with such permits are allowed to park. This is consistent with' the regulations imposed on employees of the 50`' & France area, who buy annual parking permits. Staff recommends First Reading of the proposed Ordinance Amendment. ORDINANCE NO. 2006 -5 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1235 OF THE CITY CODE TO ALLOW ISSUANCE OF TEMPORARY PARKING PERMITS IN MUNICIPAL PARKING FACILITIES The City Council of the City of Edina ordains: Section 1. The last sentence of Subsection 1235.02 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: "Provided, however, no overnight parking shall be allowed unless the vehicle displays a permit issued pursuant to Subd. 4 of Subsection 1245.03." Section 2. The heading for Subsection 1235.03 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: 111235.03 50th and France Permits" Section 3. Subsection 1235.03 of the City Code is amended by adding a new Subd. 4 as follows: "Subd. 4 Temporary Permits. Temporary permits may be issued by the Manager or his designee to individuals who are guests or visitors of the occupants of residential dwellings located in the 50`h and France Commercial Area. Such temporary permits shall not be issued for more than 14 days per vehicle and shall not be transferable to another vehicle. An application for a temporary permit shall be accompanied by the fee as set forth in Section 185 of this Code. Holders of temporary permits may park in excess of the time limits during business hours and may park between the hours of 1 AM and 6 AM, but only in locations in municipal parking facilities as shall be designated by the Manager. The temporary permit shall be displayed in the vehicle in the manner prescribed by the Manager." Section 4. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon passage and publication. Attest: First Reading: Second Reading: Publication: City Clerk Mayor TO: FROM: VIA: Mayor & City Council REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Wayne D. Houle, PE, City Engineer Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: August 15;2006 AGENDA ITEM . A. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Contract No. ENG 06 -6 Tralee Drive Water Main Improvement, Improvement No. WM -458 Company 1. AB Environmental Corporation 2. DMJ Corporation, Inc. 3. Bituminous Roadways, Inc. 4. G. L. Contracting, Inc. 5. have Perkins Contracting, Inc. 6. Ro So. Contracting, Inc. 7. Midwest Asphalt Corporation .RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: AB Environmental Amount of Quote or Bid $ 65,898.00 $ 70,739.45 $ 76,563.00 $ 77,050.00 $ 79,155.00 $ 88,530.00 $ 97,435.65 $ 65,898.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This project is the second phase of a watermain extension on Tralee Drive. The watermain extension includes constructing a watermain from the existing dead -end of Tralee Drive to the watermain located on Schey Drive. The entire project was bid out on May 10, 2006 and received no bids. The home located at 7121 Tralee Drive is currently under construction and has requested to be connected to a watermain; the former home was connected to an inadequate 1 %2" main. The first phase included a trenchless method to place the watermain, meaning that no trenches were dug.along the existing utility easements. The first phase was approved on July 5, 2006 and has been completed. The second phase includes trenching along Tralee Drive to place the watermain. This project will be funded through the 2006 -2010 Capital Improvement Program. The Engineers estimate is $75,512.50. Staff recommends awarding this project to AB Environmental. "o ignature The Recommended Bid is within budget Public Works - Engineering Department not within budget JgKin Wallin, Finance Director Gordon ughes, City nager FROM: VIA: Mayor & City Council REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Wayne Houle, Director of Public Works Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: August 15, 2006 ITEM DESCRIPTION: One "Hook Truck" System Company 1. J Craft Inc. (State Contract #435403) RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: AGENDA ITEM V. B. Amount of Quote or Bid 1. $92,166.27 J-Craft -Inc. - -- $92,166.27. GENERAL INFORMATION: This is the purchase of a Truck Body for a single axle chassis and will include a Vee Box Sander, Plow Equipment, and a Water Tanker, for the street department. This is a "Hook Truck". ruck system where the trucks have a steel hook mounted to a hydraulic cylinder that allows the truck. to interchange bodies. The trucks will be outfitted to plow snow and apply ice control throughout the winter months. The changeability of the body will then allow other uses such as dump truck, patch truck, water tanker truck, etc. Our first hook truck system was purchased in 2005 and has been very successful. This unit will replace the 1996 Ford single axle snowplow on Unit #25.309, which will be sold at auction. This purchase is through the State of Minnesota Purchasing Program and is funded through the Public Works equipment replacement fund. Signature The Recommended Bid is within budget Public Works - Streets Department not within budget Joffn Wallin, Finance Director Gordon Hughes, City Manager G:\ Engineering \Administration \CORRPW \RFP - Trucks \rtp 081506 hook truck system.doc o e .a0 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE \��RPORPT9� ieBe TO: Mayor Hovland and Members of the City Council FROM: John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: August 15, 2006 AGENDA ITEM: V. C. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Parking Lot Renovation Arneson Acres Park Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Bituminous Roadways, Inc. 1. $33,376.00 2. Midwest Asphalt Corporation 2. $45,031.00 3. Hard Drives, Inc. 3. $66,500.00 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Bituminous Roadways, Inc. $33,376.00 Account #: 47043.6710 GENERAL INFORMATION: This is for renovation of the Arneson Acres Park lower level parking lot. Specifications call for removing existing worn bituminous, grade for 3 %2" of new bituminous, place 2" of non -wear bituminous base and 1 %" bituminous wear course layer, clean up and haul away excess materials. This is a 2006 Capital Improvement Plan project #PK -05 -001, which is funded by the Revolving Fund and budgeted at $30,000.00. The $3,376.00 in excess of the budgeted amount will be covered by the $5,125.00 in remaining funds from the Bredesen Park pathway renovation 2006 CIP project, which was budgeted at $25,000 but spent only $19,875. John KciAos, Director i This Recommended bid is within budget not within bud Edina Park and Recreation Department Director Gordon Hughes, Ciliy Manager o /te To: Mayor & City Council From: James B. Hovland Mayor Date: August 15, 2006 Subject: Appointments to Bike Edina Task Force REPORT/RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item VI. A. Consent ❑ Information Only Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: 'Endorse Mayors appointments for the Bike Edina Task Force. Info/Background: I have attached a memorandum from Steve Rusk with his selection committee's recommendation for persons to be appointed to the Bike Edina Task Force. i Bike Edinq- �r rc'. TASK FORCE To: Mayor Hovland and the City Council CC: none From: Bike Edina Task Force Selection Committee; Bob Kuntze, Troy Jefferson, Dick Dekker, Lee Ann Gustafson and Steve Rusk Date: August 10, 2006 Re: Recommendation of appointments to the Bike Edina Task Force. In addition to the appointed Chair - Steven Rusk, the Selection Committee recommends to the Mayor and City Council the following ten people to be appointed to serve as Bike Edina Task Force members. Bike Edina Task Force Chair - Steven Rusk Members: • Bernie H. Beaver • Todd Brewer 9 Patrick (Pat) Foley • Barry Hans • Troy Jefferson • Dwaine Lindberg • Patricia Maloney • Patrick Milan • Jeff Terwillinger • Wilbur W. Thomas BikeEdina Sel corn memo 002 Members.doc Page 1 of 1 BikeEdina @earthhnk.net A) DI T,4 )) REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Wayne D. Houle, PE City Engineer Date: August 15, 2006 Subject: Municipal State Aid Routes Special Assessment Policy Recommendation: Agenda Item Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends Action # V1.B. ❑ToHRA ® To Council ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance Discussion Approve attached Special Assessment Policy for Municipal State Aid Routes dated August 15, 2006. Info /Background: This policy is the second part of the City's special assessment policy. On August 16, 2005, the City Council approved a Special Assessment Policy for local road reconstruction projects, see attached policy. At that time, it was understood that this policy did not include roadways that have been designated as Municipal State Aid Routes. Municipal State Aid Routes are typically financed by a combination of State monies received from the gas tax fund, local utility funds, and special assessments. The proposed Special Assessment Policy for Municipal State Aid Routes follows a similar assessment methodology as the previous policy, meaning that the special assessment is based on a "residential equivalent unit" (REU). The REU is then translated for different types of land uses, such as commercial, industrial, public buildings, and churches. Staff has analyzed this new method and has compared it against some past projects and some potential future projects, see attached spread sheet. The assessment amounts seem reasonable at the 35% level; past practice was assessed at about 20% for Municipal State Aid Routes. The other parts of the original policy such as how corner lots are assessed, financing, partial payments, etc will remain the same. G:\ Engineering \ASSESSMENTS \POLICY\2006 SA Policy Background \081506 RR MSA assessement policy.doc Special Assessment Policy Proposal — Municipal State Aid Routes DRAFT — August 15, 2006 1. Cost of Municipal State Aid (MSA) Street Curb and Gutter will be financed by either MSA funds or by the Storm Water Utility Fund. Rationale — This policy is consistent with the City's Non -MSA policy. Additionally, in accordance with State Statute, curb and gutter is required on MSA roadways in Edina in order to meet Mn/DOT design standards. Both MSA funding and Storm Water Utility funding are applicable and may be used for curb and gutter. 2. Street Reconstruction Costs (excluding curb and gutter) on MSA streets should be assessed at 35 percent of the cost. Rationale — MSA routes make up approximately 20% of Edina's roadway system. The character of these routes, both geographically and daily vehicle volumes, position them as higher functionally classified routes. As such, the City receives a small portion of the State gas tax funds to help subsidize the maintenance and reconstruction of these types of roadways. In accordance with State statute, the amount of an assessment levied on a parcel of property may not exceed the benefits received. Based on the 2005 Appraisal Consulting Report for Edina Street Reconstruction Assessments, local roadway improvements assessed at a rate of 100 percent are consistent with the realized benefit of the improvements. Understanding that this study was performed for local, residential streets on non -MSA routes, one could imply that properties adjacent to MSA routes also experience a benefit from the improvement. A cost - benefit analysis would show that a certain benefit is realized by properties adjacent to MSA routes. However, generally, it is understood and agreed that adjacent properties should not fund 100 percent of MSA roadway improvements. Based on past projects, funding options, and the 2005 Appraisal Consulting Report, a 35 percent assessment rate maintains a reasonable funding split for MSA routes. August 15, 2006 DRAFT — MSA Special Assessment Policy Adopted By City Council on Xxxx XX, 2006 Page 1 of 3 3. The assessable unit for Municipal State Aid street projects shall be based on the residential equivalent unit (REU) per Lot rather than the front footage of the lot. REUs will be prorated to parcels based on trip generation for the land uses relative to the typical single family residential land use. Rationale — Trips generated for residential lots are typically the same regardless of the size of the lot. A resident on a corner lot, cul -de -sac or circular street does not use the roads differently than a mid -block resident on the same street. One (1) REU shall be the basis and applied to a single family residence. Other multi - family, multi -use, retail, industrial, etc. properties shall be based on equivalent REUs as indicated in Table 1. The basis for the equivalent REUs is generally related to typical trip generation for the various land uses. Table 1. Edina Residential E uivalent Unit U Summary Current Land Use Class REU Notes Residential - Single Family Dwelling 1.0 1 Residential - Two Family, Duplexes, Quads 0.8 1 Residential — Apartments, Condominiums, Cooperatives, Nurseries, Convalescent Homes 0.5 1 Industrial 0.5 2,3 Office /Retail /Financial Institutions 1.5 2 Public Buildings - City 0.9 2 Public Buildings - Schools 0.2 2 Churches 0.8 2 Notes: 1.-Per Unit 2. Per Gross Floor Area 1000 SF 3. All uses allowed in Planned Industrial Development (PID) except offices and retail. 4. If a corner lot is subject to multiple street reconstruction assessments over a period of years, the total assessable cost should be the equivalent to 1 residential equivalent unit. Rationale — This policy is consistent with the City's Non =MSA policy. 5. Multiple Assessments cannot be treated differently than areas with one assessment being incurred. Rationale — This policy is consistent with the City's Non -MSA policy. August 15, 2006 DRAFT — MSA Special Assessment Policy Adopted By City Council on Xxxx XX, 2006 Page 2 of 3 6. The term of MSA roadway reconstruction assessments will be 10 years. Rationale — This policy is consistent with the Non -MSA policy. 7. Assessment Interest Rate — The interest rate of the assessment should be pegged to the assessment bonds that have been issued in the past 12 months or the 10 year Aaa bond rate plus 2 %. Rationale — This policy is consistent with the City's Non -MSA policy. 8. The City will accept both partial pre - payments and full pre - payments on assessments before going to the County for tax rolls. For ease of administration, a minimum of 25% of the assessable cost must be applied for a partial payment. Rationale — This policy is consistent with the City's Non -MSA policy. 9. Payment Schedule — Currently, assessments are calculated on a level principal payment schedule. This results in a declining payment schedule which is cheaper than a traditional amortized schedule which would have equal payments over the life of the assessment. Staff recommends that the declining balance schedule continue to be used because of the lower total cost. Rationale — This policy is consistent with the City's Non -MSA policy. 10. The new policy will not be retroactive to projects that have already been assessed and/or where project assessments are pending. Rationale: This policy is consistent with the City's Non -MSA policy. August 15, 2006 DRAFT — MSA Special Assessment Policy Adopted By City Council on Xxxx XX, 2006 Page 3 of 3 Date: 8/'0/2006 City of Edina Engineering Dept. Alternate Assessment Ratio Summary Past Practice I Proposed Residential Equivalent Unit Per Fronts a Per 1 REU Assessment Amount % of total project assessed Existing Projects Project Cost of Improvements 20% 20% 35% 50% Woodda le Ave. Residential (comparable 80-ft frontage) $1,065,000 $2,712 $1,850 $3,237 $4,62 Commercial - Wallas 1944 s $2,255 $2,697 $4,720 $6,743 Commercial-Strip Mail 15942 s $5,424 $22,119 $38,709 $55,29 Commercial -Clanc s 17430 s $12,275 $24,184 $42,322 $60,45 20% 35% 50% Valle y %4ew Rd. I Residential (comparable 80 -ft frontage) $1,050,000 $3,988 $2,232 $3,906 $5,580 Residential Duplex 75-ft frontage) $3,762 $3,571 $6,249 $8,92 Apartment 5 unit), 6201 Brookview $1,827 $5,580 $9,764 $13,94 Apartment 14 unit), 4401 VV $8,695 $15,623 $27,340 $39,0 Commercial -New Horizon 4480 s wasn't commercial $13,461 $14,998 $26,2471 $37,496 Commercial- Clanc s 17430 $4,922 $29,176 $51,058 $72,940 Commercial- Burley's 1257 s $14,034 $2,104 $3,682 $5,260 Commercial - Ice Cream Parlor 1728 $14,987 $2,893 $5,062 $7,231 Commercial - Peterson Design 8772 s $2,991 $9,789 $17,131 $24,473 20% 35% 50% West 5 "'St. Residential (comparable 80-ft frontage) $357,000 $5,433 $6,723 $11,766 $16,80 Future Projects Conco Residential $550,000 $1,438 $2,516 $3,595 Concord School/Southview School $52,960 $92,680 $132,400 70th 8 l4etro Residential $29,000 $967 $1,692 $2,417 Gramercy $341,409 $10,898 $19,072 $27,246 Day Care $2,748 $4,808 $6,869 Metro Gen Partnership $24,761 $43,332 $61,904 Regis $29,874 $52,280 $74,686 Edina Residential E ulvalent Unit IRE U Summary Residential - Single Family Dwelling 1 1 1 Residential - Two Family, Duplexes, Quads 0.8 0.8 0.8 Residential - Apartments, Condominiums, Coo eratives, Nurseries, Convalescent Homes 0.5 0.5 0.5 Industrial 0.5 0.5 0.5 Retail/FinancialInstitutions 1.5 1.5 1.5 Office 1.5 1.5 1.5 Public Buildings - City 0.9 0.9 0.9 Public Buildings - Schools 0.2 0.2 0.2 Hospital 0.5 0.51 0.5 Churches 0.8 0.81 0.8 Approved by Council 8/16/05 Special Assessment Policy Proposal August 16, 2005 1. Cost of Non -State Aid Residential Street Curb and Gutter will be financed by the Stormwater Utility Fund. For the 2004 -2005 assessment projects, this will require an increase in Storm water rates of approximately $2.00 per household per quarter. Rationale — The curb and gutter system is an above - the - ground water drainage system that controls storm water within the City. Staff feels very strongly about the addition of curb and gutter in the City where it does not exist today. It is very important in areas of poor soil condition, steep grade changes or very flat conditions. It also decreases the degradation of the residential roadway system, reduces fall and spring street maintenance and aids in street cleaning and snow plowing. Projects to be reimbursed by proposed change (to be assessed Oct. 2005): Halifax & Grimes - $137,000 (approx 24% of street costs) Shannon Dr. - $18,000 (100% of assessable costs) Sunnyslope - $40,000 (6% of assessable costs) Bridge Lane - $10,000 (9% of assessable costs) Schaefer Circle - $14,000 (petition requesting C &G only if policy is approved) Total $ 219,000 Curb and Gutter Cost Projections for Future Year Assessment Projects: Estimated cost for 2006 - $441,000 ( +2.14 per household per quarter) Estimated cost for 2007 - $621,000 ( +1.56 /per household per quarter) Attachment: Survey of Stormwater Utility Rates 2005 Note: Stormwater rates will need approximately a $1.50 - $2.00 per quarter increase to cover the cost of projects occurring independent of this policy. If adopted, staff will be proposing a $4.00 per household per quarter increase this fall. 2. Street Reconstruction Cost (excluding curb and gutter) should be assessed at 100% of the cost. Rationale - Based on an appraisal study conducted by the Valuation Group, the consultants indicated that the market value benefit of the street improvements equates to the cost of the improvements being done. Assuming Council agrees with the Page 1 of 5 financing of curb and gutter improvements, the risk of losing an assessment challenge by a resident or neighborhood is diminished due to the extensive study that was conducted and the subsidy of the curb and gutter cost. In most projects, the street reconstruction cost represents only a percentage of the entire project costs. Most projects include other storm water improvements as well as sanitary sewer and water system improvements. The table below shows the total and assessable costs of projects that will be assessed this fall or next year depending on construction completion. Project Cost of All Improvements Curb & Gutter Assessable Cost % Assessable Halifax & Grimes $ 888,900 $ 137,000 $ 420,000 47% So. Harriet Park $ 1,029,872 $ - $ 588,000 57% Sunn sloe $ 1,028,218 $ 40,000 $ 663,000 64% Schaefer Rd. $ 264,290 $ - $ 195,000 74% Shannon Dr. $ 168,719 $ 18,000 $ - 0% Bridge Lane $ 106,601 $ 9,975 $ 97,000 91% 3. The assessable unit for non -state aid residential street projects should be the residential equivalent unit (Lot) rather than the front footage of the lot. Rationale — Trips generated for residential lots are the same regardless of the size of the lot. A resident on a corner lot, cul -de -sac or circular street does not use the roads differently than a mid -block resident on the same street. 4. If a corner lot is subject to multiple street reconstruction assessments over a period of years, the total assessable cost should be the equivalent to 1 residential equivalent unit. Rationale — Current policy allows the assessment of the front of a corner lot to be assessed at one R.E.U. and the side lot for another assessment project to be assessed at 1/3 of an R.E.U. Staff believes that the total of both assessments should not exceed one R.E.U. so that lots are equitably assessed over the City. A corner lot does not generate more trips onto the residential roadway system than a non - corner lot. 5. Multiple Assessments cannot be treated differently than areas with one assessment being incurred. Rationale — Assessrrlents must be equitable to all homes that are being assessed. This issue was driven by the potential of a portion of the Country Club being assessed for sound walls and residential road reconstruction. If and when the Country Club area gets assessed for street improvements, you have the option to re- assess the sound wall improvement to a longer term. By re- assessing, the Council opens the assessment up to a potential challenge. If a challenge was raised, you could leave the sound wall assessment at the current term of 15 years and decide not to re- assess. Page 2 of 5 6. The term of residential roadway reconstruction assessments should stay at 10 years. Rationale — There was some discussion of extending the term of residential roadway reconstruction to 15 years. While this would be legal, rating agencies prefer the term for residential assessments to match the term of the bonds. This would also increase the interest cost to the homeowner 7. Assessment Interest Rate — The interest rate of the assessment should be pegged to the assessment bonds that have been issued in the past 12 months or the 10 year Aaa bond rate plus 2 %. Rationale — The City's assessments of the past number of years have been charged a fixed rate of 6.5 %. The number and dollar amount of improvement projects have allowed the City to internally finance the capital cost of the improvements. With the amount of improvements occurring this year and in future years, the City has incorporated a public debt component to the special assessment process. The bonds are General Obligation (G.O.) debt that is used to pay the construction costs and are supported by the stream of assessment payments over the term of the bonds (10 years). Because the City is using G.O. public improvement bonds to finance the improvements, State law requires that the amount of assessments (or taxes) that come in each year must equal 105% of the debt service Payment on the bonds for each year. In order to achieve the necessary 105 %, the assessment interest rate needs to be pegged at the bond's interest rate plus 2% or approximately 5.9 %. Some cities have a lower rate than this because they have taxes supporting the bonds or they internally finance their public improvements. Of the cities we studied, only one had a lower interest rate than the one staff is proposing. city Calculation Index Assessment Rate Edina Bond Rate + 2% 3.92% 5.92% Bloomington Bond Rate + 1% 3.92% 4.92% Plymouth Prime Rate +.5% 6.25% 6.75% Fddley None 6.50% Maple Grove None 6.00% The excess dollars generated by the statutory 105% requirement is used to make up for cost of bond issuance, delinquencies and underpayments. 8. The City will accept both partial pre - payments and full pre - payments on assessments before going to the County for tax rolls. For ease of administration, a minimum of 25% of the assessable cost must be applied for a partial payment. Page 3 of 5 Rationale — City past practice allowed only 100% pre - payment on assessments. Many residents have inquired in the past about partial pre - payments to reduce their annual tax bill. This will create some extra calculations, but this is a good public relations move with a minor increase in workload. The full and partial pre - payments can only occur after the assessment hearing and before the certification to the County. This is gives the resident approximately 30 days to make the payment. Staff will make sure extra information is provided to the residents when they get their formal assessment notice information before the hearings. 9. Payment Schedule — Currently, assessments are calculated on a level principal payment schedule. This results in a declining payment schedule which is cheaper than a traditional amortized schedule which would have equal payments over the life of the assessment. Staff recommends that the declining balance schedule continue to be used because of the lower total cost. Rationale — See payment schedules attached. Council could provide an option on more expensive projects to select an amortized level payment schedule, but this needs to be selected for the entire project. The amount of time provided to staff to certify the assessments to the County doesn't allow for mixing and matching of payment schedules for each assessment project. 10. The new policy will not be retroactive to projects that have already been assessed. Rationale: It would be very difficult to determine how many years to go back and re- assess projects that have been completed and already assessed. Looking back at projects that were assessed since 1999, most of the projects were assessed at a cost per lot of around $2,000 - $4,000 per lot. The 2004 Maple Rd./White Oaks assessment cost $5,941 per lot. This year's projects have taken a substantial jump in total cost due to the need to reconstruct vs. reclaim the street pavement. Estimates for this year's project range from $7,200/lot for So. Harriet Park to $11,000/lot for Sunnyslope. As we forecast future street projects, our estimates indicate most will be in the $8,000 - $12,000 per lot range. Our research with other City's policies indicates that all cities made a clean break when beginning their new programs. Page 4 of 5 A couple of elements of the Senior Deferral Program should change for equity and fairness. Rationale: a. The current interest rate for the deferral program is one percentage point higher than the standard assessment rate. This should be changed to reflect the new interest rate adopted in this policy (bond rate plus 2 %) b. The current deferral policy requires that both spouses live in the residence. This should be changed to reflect situations that have one of the spouses residing in a facility that accommodates health care situations (i.e. assisted living centers, etc.) Some other administrative changes (application dates, etc.) would be made to the policy. If Council agrees with the changes to the Senior Deferral Program, Staff would prepare the appropriate resolution to bring back to Council for approval in September. Page 5 of 5 y I ,. 2 Why? - Consideration for Change • IVISA Routes are typically mixed type developments, i.e.: residential & commercial • IVISA Routes are typically collectors and above. • Requirements of Ch. 429 Statutes on Special Assessments: - Properties levied must receive benefit from improvement - Assessment must be uniform - Assessment must not exceed special benefit • Local roadways are assessed at a "residential equivalent unit" (REU) 3 City of Edina Why? Municipal State Aid Streets 7- -- ? 4; L 7 Ij c. State Aid Streets 4. Why? - Consideration for Change • IVISA Routes are typically mixed type developments, i.e.: residential & commercial • IVISA Routes are typically collectors and above. • Requirements of Ch. 429 Statutes on Special Assessments: - Properties levied must receive benefit from improvement - Assessment must be uniform - Assessment must not exceed special benefit • Local roadways are assessed at a "residential equivalent unit" (REU) 3 How? - Tools for Analysis Looked at typical MSA Routes — Number of lanes (width). — Type of properties — residential and commercial. — Likelihood of near future reconstruction. • Reviewed past assessments in comparison to recommended policy:: o. 4 #1. Curb & Gutter to be paid by either Storm water Utility Funds or MSA funds • Curb & Gutter is required on all MSA Routes = MNDOT requirement • MSA funds can also be used for curb and gutter in lieu of storm water funds. Ifs, . 5 #2. Street Reconstruction Cost (excluding C &G) on MSA streets should be assessed at 35% of the cost. MSA routes make up 20% of roadway system. • Typically higher functional classification — collectors, arterials, etc. • City receives a portion of the gas tax fund for these routes. Local roadways can be assessed at 100% of cost. MSA routes should not be assessed at 100% of cost. 35% is a reasonable funding split for MSA Routes. #2. Street Reconstruction Cost (excluding C &G) on MSA streets should be assessed at 35% of the cost. Past Projects: Project A: Property Type Past Practice Proposed Residential $2,712 $3,237 Commercial — A $2,255 $4,720 Commercial — B* $5,424 $38,709 Commercial — C* $12,275 $42,322 * - Commercial B & C are 15,000 to 17,000 SF 0 0 #2. Street Reconstruction Cost (excluding C &G) on MSA streets should be assessed at 35% of the cost. Project B: Property Type Past Practice Proposed Residential $3,988 $3,906 Residential — Duplex $3,762 $6,249 Residential — Apts $1,827 $9,764 Commercial — A $13,461 $26,247 Commercial — B $4,922 $51,058 Commercial — C $14,987 $5,062 #2. Street Reconstruction Cost (excluding C &G) on MSA streets should be assessed at 35% of the cost. Future Project: Property Type Residential Apts / Condos Commercial — small Commercial — large Office — large Past Practice Proposed $ 1,692 $19,072 $ 4,808 $43,332 $52,280 7 #3. Assessable Unit for MSA projects shall be based on a Residential Equivalent Unit (lot) rather than front footage. REU's will be pro -rated to parcels based on trip generation for landuses relative to typical single family homes. • Trips generated for single family residential lots are typically the same regardless of the size of the lot. • Trips generated for higher density homes are typically less per unit such as apartments, condominiums, etc. • Trips generated for industrial and commercial produce more trips per square foot than homes. #3. Assessable Unit for MSA projects shall be based on a Residential Equivalent Unit (lot) rather than front footage. REU's will be prorated to parcels based on trip generation for landuses relative to typical single family homes. Current Land Use Class REU Residential - Single Family Dwelling 1.0 Residential - Two Family, Duplexes, Quads 0.8 Residential — Apartments, Condominiums, Cooperatives, Nurseries, Convalescent Homes 0.5 Industrial 0.5 Office /Retail /Financial Institutions 1.5 Public Buildings- City 0.9 Public Buildings - Schools 0.2 . Churches 0.8 K L_ #4. If a corner lot is subject to multiple street assessments over a period of years, the total assessable cost should be the equivalent of one Residential Equivalent Unit • Same as non -MSA policy. • For purposes of fairness and equity, a corner lot should be assessed for a total of one R.E.U. #5. Multiple Assessments cannot be treated differently than areas with only one assessment • Same as non -MSA policy. • All homes / properties in road assessment area must be treated equally. E #6. The term of residential roadway assessment should stay at 10 years • Same as non -MSA policy. • Public Improvement bonds at 10 years — Rating agencies need payout schedules to match term of bonds. V. The interest rate on assessments will be set at the bond rate plus 2 %. If bonds have not been issued for 12 months, the 10 year Aaa rate will be used • Same as non -MSA policy. • Statutory requirements mandate that our rate be at this level, unless a tax component is added to the annual payments. 10 J. P #8. The City will accept both partial and full pre- payments on assessments before going to County tax rolls. For ease of administration, a minimum of 25% of the assessable cost must be applied for partial prepayment • Same as non -MSA policy. #9 Payment Schedule — Assessments should be calculated on a declining payment schedule because it is cheaper than a "mortgage style" amortized schedule • Same as non -MSA policy. 11 #10 - The new policy should not be retroactive to projects that have already been assessed or where project assessments are pending. • Recommend projects under construction or completed, but not assessed, be handled under current policy since original hearing indicated assessment methodology; i.e. West 58th Street should remain at 20 %, otherwise would require to be hold another Public Hearing for the project. L 12 0-4 e AGENDA ITEM VI.C. RECREATIONAL FIRE REPORT ❑ No packet data Oral presentation ❑ Information coming Otte ,eaa REPORURECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item VI.D. From: GORDON L. HUGHES Consent ❑ CITY MANAGER Information Only ❑ Date: AUGUST 15, 2006 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: CANADIAN PACIFIC RAIL ® Motion TRAIL ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance FT. . Discussion RECOMMENDATION: Accept Planning Study and authorize submission to Canadian Pacific Rail for approval of right -of -way issues. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached is a planning study that has been prepared by Kris Kubicek of the Planning Department. Kris will present this study at Tuesday night's meeting. This study evaluates the feasibility of constructing a bike /pedestrian trail within the Canadian Pacific Rail right- of-way which extends in a north south direction through the middle of the City. If constructed, this trail will continue into St. Louis Park for the purpose of linking with various regional trails that extend into the city of Minneapolis. The trail is also proposed to extend southerly into the city of Bloomington where it will intersect an extensive trail system which serves communities south of Edina. The purpose of this study is to set the stage for the eventual submission of an application for federal funding in 2007. Prior to this submission, however, we wish to secure necessary approvals from CP Rail in order to allow joint use of their right -of -way. As such, we recommend that the REPORT /RECOMMENDATION - Canadian Pacific Rail Trail August 15, 2006 Page two Council receives this planning study and authorizes its submission to CP Rail for right -of -way discussions. Concurrent with submission to CP Rail, I also suggest that this planning study be referred to the newly formed Bikeway Task Force for their review and comment. However, I would recommend that submission to CP Rail should occur immediately, given our presumption that their review may take several months to complete. In my view, it is important that we attempt to resolve right -of -way issues with CP Rail prior to submission for funding in early 2007. Regional Canadian Pacific Trail Planning Study Prepared for the City of Edina by Planning Staff Member Kris Kubicek August 2006 Study Intent The purpose of the study is to introduce the concept and feasibility of a Bicycle/Pedestrian trail that will run north/south through the Cities of Edina, Bloomington and St Louis Park. This trail, when completed, will connect with existing trails in St Louis Park and Bloomington. The St Louis Park connection will facilitate continuity with the South West LRT Trail and Cedar Lake Trail which serves the City of Minneapolis. This initial study and plan will include an assessment of the need for trails, community partners, trail concepts and designs, benefits a trail can provide, and an assessment of the study area. The trail is proposed to utilize the Canadian Pacific (CP) Rail right of way through Edina. The right of way is an active rail line and CP Rail will need to consent to the purposed trail. Southeast Henneain Countv Regional Trails Table of Contents A. Introduction • Need for trail 4 • Trail Location and Intent 5 • Community Partners 7 B. Trail Concept Plan • Design Elements 9 • Parking 9 • Safety and Security 9 • Liability and Maintenance 10 • Environmental Conditions 10 • Trail Users 11 • Opportunities /Constraints 11 C. Assessment of Study Area • Section 1 13 • Section 2 13 • Section 3 14 • Section 4 15 • Section 5 15 • Section 6 16 • St Louis Park 16 • Bloomington 17 D. Figures • Figure 1 — Regional Map • Figure 2 — Benefiting Communities • Figure 3 — Regional Trails • Figure 4 — Sections of Edina Trail • Figure 5 — Section 1 • Figure 6 — Section 2 • Figure 7 — Section 3 • Figure 8 — Section 4 • Figure 9 — Section 5 • Figure 10 —Section 6 K • Figure 11 — St Louis Park • Figure 12 — Bloomington • Figure 13 — At Grade Crossings • Figure A -E — Sectional Depictions of the Trail Introduction Need for Trail "When residents and historians look back at this period in the Twin Cities, they will clearly identify it as the great era of bicycle trail construction. We are in the midst of creating an essential new element in the transportation and recreation systems of the 21st century. Bicycles may have been invented in the 19th century, but they are becoming even more important in the 21st. " Hennepin County Commissioner Peter McLaughlin October 31, 2001 Invitation Letter to Bicycle Gaps Meeting Providing well - planned, safe pedestrian and bicycle paths has become more important in the past decade. Growing concerns for the general health of the nation in addition to the growing density of the cities in which we live have led to the need for trails. Trails can provide recreation areas for increased health and exercise and also provide alternatives to the automobile dominated transportation system. Although most Americans realize that exercise is linked to their health many still do not exercise. The surgeon general has estimated that 60% of all Americans are not regularly active and 65% of Americans are overweight or obese'. As communities have grown open space and places for physical activity have been replaced with roads and development, encouraging more driving and less physical activity. Research done by Active Living, however, has determined that communities that develop infrastructure to encourage activities such as walking or biking with links to destinations have more physically active residents. In addition, communities that improve non - motorized travel conditions often experience significant increases in non - motorized travel2. Bicycles as a means of alternative transportation is not a new one and is fully embraced by both the City of Edina and Hennepin County. According to the Hennepin County executive summary for the bicycle and transportation plan, Hennepin County supports 4 bicycle use as a choice for general transportation including commuter, utilitarian, and recreation trips. The county's Department of Public Works -- Transportation Division prepared a Bicycle Transportation Plan which showed that there is a need for Hennepin County to establish a safe, convenient bicycle transportation system. The focus of the plan is the provision of the infrastructure necessary to allow the bicycle to become a viable transportation option.3 A similar study also done by Hennepin County established a map that designated existing trails and identified gaps, or places in Hennepin County where trails are needed to complete a large scale county wide system of interconnected trails. Edina was identified as having four gaps, St Louis Park has three and Bloomington has over ten 4. This is clearly an indication of the potential for these communities to expand their bike trails. Trail Location and Intent The intent for this trail is to provide increased recreation opportunities and create alternative transportation opportunities. Through locational strengths and connections the addition of the Regional Canadian Pacific Trail (RCPT) will greatly benefit many communities. Although the majority of the study area is located in Edina, Minnesota, the cities of Bloomington and St Louis Park are valuable community partners in the implementation and connectivity of the RCPT. All three communities are located in the southeastern portion of Hennepin County (Figure 1). St Louis Park is located to the north of Edina and Bloomington is located to the south of Edina. The RCPT's greatest strength is that it will be accessible to residential units, including low, medium and high density homes, along the entire route. The access will also benefit employees who wish to use an alternative transportation route. Examples of commercial areas in Edina that will benefit from a greater customer base 5 and alternative commuter routes for employees include the Edina Interchange Center, in South Edina, and the employment nodes in the Grandview Area, which are in the northerly end of the project in Edina. The RCPT will provide benefits not only to the three adjoining communities but also to the surrounding communities (Figure 2). The northern end of the RCPT will connect with the Southwest LRT Trail in St Louis Park, which travels west to Hopkins and east to Minneapolis. The southern end of the RCPT in Bloomington will connect with Eden Prairie, Minnetonka and Chanhassen. Once completed this trail will offer multiple destinations, more direct commute times and safer routes for bikers and pedestrians. The RCPT will also provide a connection to a First Tier Trail (FTT) which is being planned by the Three Rivers Park District. Four FTTs are being planned for inner ring suburbs of Minneapolis. One of the four trails is planned to run east/west through Edina, Richfield and Hopkins. Hopkins dinnetonka Eden Prairie Minneapolis =' Richfield Edina - ---- •^ Iir.t licr Irail Ke; b nal a anadian Pacilk 1 rail 6 Community Partners As the development and implementation of the RCPT moves forward it is important that it create connections outside of Edina. By connecting with other trails and communities the trail will serve a greater population, allow for greater connectivity and more destinations. Edina Edina is a first ring suburb of Minneapolis and is bordered by St. Louis Park to the north and Bloomington to the south. Although Edina only encompasses 15.7 square miles its population has now reached 47,425 and provides jobs for 50,000 individuals. The main portion of the RCPT, which is four miles in length, travels through the heart of Edina. The trail passes within a quarter mile of many single family homes and high density residential units. The trail will provide a unique opportunity for Edina as it will provide an off road biking trail, which is valuable for both experienced and casual riders. There are several loop trails in Edina parks, which include. the Bredesen Park bike path and the Lake Cornelia bike path. In total there are seven miles of bike paths. Although these trails are a benefit to Edina there is a need for a trail that will offer residents more options for biking. The current trails are focused on looping around parks. There is a need for a trail to travel through Edina and offer options to not only recreational bikers but bike commuters as well. Edina's population could become a strain on current amenities and lead to additional space and transportation needs. This has caused the City of Edina to begin to investigate means of building up instead of out. Alternative means of transportation will become more useful in the coming years as the population continues to grow property use becomes more intense, as forecast by the Metropolitan Council. 7 St Louis Park Similar to Edina, the City of St Louis Park is growing in density. St Louis Park has a population of 44,126 within its 10.7 square miles. The City of St Louis Park has been making great strides towards a more bike -able community. Along with their 51 parks St Louis Park has two regional off road bike trails that travel through the city, which connect to Hopkins to the west and Minneapolis to the east. St Louis Park has indicated a willingness to work with Edina to connect RCPT with the St Louis Park trail systems. The trail will continue on the railroad right of way as it did through Edina until the intersection of the rail line with Brunswick Avenue. At that point the trail will become a shared road trail, traveling north until it meets with the Southwest Trial. Bloomington Bloomington is a larger city than either St Louis Park or Edina. Bloomington encompasses 38.4 square miles and has a population of 85,172 citizens. There are a total of 106,993 jobs in Bloomington. Along with multiple parks Bloomington contains 14.3 miles of bike trails. Many of the trails are loop trails that travel around parks and green spaces. The RCPT will provide an excellent opportunity for bikers to travel to other communities in the region. The trail in Bloomington will pick up where it left off traveling along the West side of the CP Rail line. The trail will cross over Interstate 494. On the south side of I494 the trail will have the opportunity to move off of the CP right of way land. West of the rail road is land that is owned by the City of Bloomington. The trail could travel south along this route until it meets with 84`" Street, where there is already an existing bike trail. 8 Trail Concept Plan The RCPT is a proposed trail that will run north /south through the Cities of Bloomington, Edina and St Louis Park (Figure 3). The RCPT is intended as both a recreational trail and a north /south connection for commuters. An important concept in this plan is that the RCPT is being retrofitted into built out communities where space is tight. To accomplish this, the trail has been designed to be co- located in the CP Rail right of way which is currently used as an active rail line. The community partners wish to full cooperate with CP and would like to address the requirements contained in CP Rails policy on trails. The following section addresses the requirements set forth by CP Rail. Design Elements (Figures A, B, C) The design of the RCPT has a minimum setback of 15 feet from the railroad tracks. Areas where the right of way is larger will allow a larger setback. The trail itself will be a minimum of ten to twelve feet in width. This will allow for two lanes of bike trails, one going north and the other going south. The lanes will be wider than necessary to provide room for pedestrians who wish to share the trail. The trail will also have several benches and rest stops designed for the comfort of trail users. Parking The southern end of the trail is nestled in between an industrial area. For this reason there are several possibilities for both parking and extensions of the trail. The southern end is just north of Bloomington, which has expressed interested to the City of Edina in connecting bike paths. The industrial areas have multiple parking lots which could be used, with permission of the owners, for weekend trail riders. This is currently a practice in Minneapolis with the Lake Calhoun Executive Office. During the weekend this parking lot fills up from those wishing to enjoy the lakes. G Safety and Security Safety of the trail users is a priority in the design and implementation of the trail. Although the trains are not currently moving at high speeds, it would be best to choose a design that will work should the railroad decide to upgrade the rails to accommodate a higher speed train. The first element of safety to be installed will be a fence running in between the trail and the rail lines. The exact type of fence has yet to be decided but it will be at least four feet high. There will also be signs posted to remind the trail users that the rails are off limits. Some portions of the right of way have a steeper grade and will therefore have a different elevation than the railroad tracks (Figure D and E). At this time the trains are not moving fast enough to throw debris but this could change in the future. This issue can be addressed through the planting of shrubs or a live fence, in addition to the man made fence. Sightlines will not be disturbed with the additional landscaping. Another feature of the trail will be the lighting of the tunnels and underpasses. There are five of these structures along the trail each of which will be equipped with safety lighting and call boxes. We believe that this will improve safety and crime prevention. The whole trail will not be lit as it is not intended for night usage. Liability and Maintenance The City of Edina will assume all maintenance and liability issues associated with the trail within the City of Edina. Maintenance and the cleaning of litter and debris will be undertaken by the appropriate city parks department. The policing of the trail inside Edina will be handled by the City of Edina police. Environment Considerations R17 The RCPT will follow strict guidelines for protecting the environment in which it co- exists. There are several places where a wetland or body of water is encountered along the path. To protect the area bridges or boardwalks will be built over the sensitive areas. The locations for these bridges or boardwalks will be indicated below when the trail is divided into sections. The trail will be landscaped for both aesthetic and environmental purposes. The environmental purposes will help avoid erosion in areas of steep slope and provide habitat for the animals that live in the area. The City of Edina will be responsible for the management of the trail and the surrounding vegetation. Users The trail will be designated for both bicycle and pedestrian use. The path will be one continuous bituminous path with striping to designate the different uses. North and south bikers will each have their own lane while pedestrian lanes will vary depending on design (see Figures a and B). An example Trail Users on the Cedar Lake Trail. Photo by City of Edina Engineering Dept. Division of Trails. Photo by City of Edina Engineering Dept. of this practice in use is the Cedar Lake Trail in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Opportunities /Constraints of RCPT Edina, as previously mentioned, is a built out city. In order to clearly identify the issues that need to be addressed for this trail to be successful it is important to identify both the opportunities and constraints of the trail. These will help mold the trail into a workable, safe, highly used area that will be a benefit to all involved. Opportunities • The trail has city council support • The trail has the support of Hennepin County. • The trail has the support of the surrounding cities. • The city of Edina is lacking trails and needs them • The trail will provide alternative transportation • A built trail will provide a safe means of travel for those who are currently using the rail corridor illegally, also protecting CP Rail from action taken by anyone hurt using the trail. • The trail will offer connection points to residential areas, school, parks, other planned city trails and region trails. Constraints • The right of way is actively used as a rail line • Portions of the trail encounter narrow rights of ways • The community is built out • Portions of the trail encounter areas of fully developed residential areas 12 Assessment of Study Area The following section will break down the study area into segments (Figure 4). The initial sections will describe the Edina portions of the trail with Bloomington and St Louis Park immediately following. This section will describe the beginning and end of the trail, connections the trail will make, need for physical changes to the land and structures along the trail, and a description of what the trail could look like. At -grade crossings are depicted in Figure 13. Section 1: Mile 0.0 to 0.5 (Figure 5): The initial part of the trail has a large right of way and the trail can be a greater distance from the tracks. Although the area is residential the trail does not run adjacent to houses. The trail will follow the area between the rail road tracks and Brookside Avenue. There are two at grade crossings in this section. Bike riders and pedestrians will have to cross over 44'h Street and 48`h Street. Stop signs will be added to the trail at this point to alert trail users to potential traffic. This section will lend itself well to a trail. The north half of this section is flat and contains a large area that will adapt well to the construction of the trail and allow for a wider trail. Existing trees along this section will provide excellent shade for the trail. The southern portion of this section, in addition to the existing trees, has some rolling hills that will add texture and character to the trail. This section ends at the Grandview Area with a connection for users to the commercial region on the west side of Vernon. Section 2: Mile 0.5 to .95 (Figure 6): The next section, in which the trail moves into the Grandview area, is a transition from a low density residential area to an area with both commercial and industrial zoning 13 along with the high density residential areas. Before emerging into the Grandview area, however, the trail travels under two underpasses. The bridges are large enough, however, for a shared area. No extra construction will be needed to enlarge the bridges. The Grandview area contains both commercial and industrial land along with high density residential. Some of the destinations within this area include a school, a Senior Citizens Center, the Edina Library, a Grocery Store and several shops along with employment opportunities in both the shops and nearby industrial area. This portion of the trail continues on the west side of the right of way, traveling along the backside of commercial areas. Users will have to cross one at grade intersection at Eden Avenue. This intersection will also serve as an area where those who chose could divert off the trail and visit nearby retail, library and grocery store having easy access to the commercial areas to the east of Vernon. The trail, at this point, will change side of the tracks and start to travel along the east side. This will allow easier access for those wishing to travel to the nearby school Section 3: Mile .95 to 1.25 (Figure 7): This portion of the trail continues along the east side of the rail road tracks. This portion of the trail enters another low density residential area. Although the area in the right of way has some steep slopes the east side slopes will be easier to work with than the west side. The east side also provides access points and users could divert off the trail to Garden Park that lies one block off the trail on 58th street. The last part of this trail will include an -at grade crossing over Hansen 14 Road. The crossing is at grade and will initially cross over the rail road tracks at a ninety degree angle for safety. A stop sign and warning signs will be posted to alert trail users. The trail will then cross over Hansen Road where there will be a crosswalk and signs posted. The crossings are separated for the safety of the trail users. Section 4: Mile 1.25 to 2.55 (Figure 8): This section of the trail intersects with a Garden Park. The trail will change back to the west side of the tracks to be able to maintain a higher degree of safety for the children from the park and baseball field that wish to use the trail. There will also be a point of access on the south side of the fields where the trail will join an existing trail that runs along the ball fields. The trail will have another access point just south of the park where it joins a cul -de -sac. One half mile south of the park the trail encounters the first of two underpasses in this section. The first is at Benton Avenue and the second is at Valley View Road. In both cases the bridges are large enough that an extension or new tunnel is not needed. This section ends shortly after the second underpass the trail encounters. Section 5: Mile 2.55 to 3.45 (Figure 9): This section also runs along the west side of the tracks. There is only one bridge that the trail will pass under but both the bridge has sufficient space on the west side that no extra construction to the bridges should be necessary. The trail crosses under Highway 62 at this point. The trail has one at grade crossing over Valley Lane and will need a signal to warn, and potentially stop, traffic to ensure the safety of the trail users. This intersection provides an opportunity for users to access Heights Park. They will have to travel along Valley 15 Lane and through an access point the already exists between two single family homes. South of the park is an area of wetlands and the nine mile creek runs underneath the trail. In order to avoid harming the wetlands or the stream a boardwalk will be built to go over the area. The trail will continue on the west side as it crosses underneath 701h Avenue. Section 6: Mile 3.45 to 4.1 (Figure 10): The first part of this section is the first point in the trail that encounters a tunnel or bridge that does not provide room for dual access. The tunnel, which runs under 701h Street, is currently a large circular tunnel. There is very little room to either side of the tracks for the trail. This study suggests that another tunnel be dug specifically for the bike trail use on the east side of the trail. Shortly after the tunnel the trail once again encounters a commercial area. An access point will be added for those wishing to use the commercial areas. Further south of the intersection is the last at -grade crossing for the RCPT. The crossing will occur at Dewey Hill Road. The trail then continues on into Bloomington. Connections St Louis Park (Figure 11) : After the railroad leaves Edina it enters into St Louis Park. St. Louis Park has several existing off road bike trails within their community and has indicated that they will be interested in extending the CP trail on the rail lines through Edina. The trail will be able to travel in the right of way and will need a bridge to cross over Excelsior Blvd as this is a busy street and crossing will be difficult as there is currently no light at the intersection. Un The trail will continue along the rail lines until it intersects with Brunswick Avenue. At this point the trail will divert off the tracks and become a shared road path. There will be signs to warn cars of bike and pedestrian activity but there will not be any marked lanes. This is a very low use road with slow moving traffic. The trail will follow Brunswick Avenue North until it connects with the Southwest Trial, which leads into downtown Minneapolis. Bloomington (Figure 12): The trail in Bloomington will pick up where it left off traveling along the West side of the Canadian Pacific Rail line. The trail will cross over Interstate 494 and will need to extend the current rail road bridge or build a new one to cross over the interstate. On the south side of 1494 the trail will have the opportunity to move off of the Railroad land. West of the rail road is land that is owned by the City of Bloomington. The trail could travel south along this route until it meets with 84th Street, where there is already an existing bike trail. 1 Active Living Network. Community Design, Transportation and Health. www.activeliving.org. z Active Living Network. Communications Toolkit. www.activeliving.org. 3 Hennepin County. Hennepin County Bicycle Transportation Report. http:// www. co. hennepin. mn. us/ vpn /pprtal/intemet/hcdetailmaster /0.2300.1273 83394 100216884.00.html 4Hennepin County, Hennepin County Bicycle Gap Study. http: / /www.co. hennepin .mn.us /vgn/imagea/portaUcit_ 100003616 /38/12/103616720fu11gap listl.htm 17 Louis Park pkins Figure 1 Benefiting Communities Hennepin Surrounding Hennepin Communities henefiting from the Regional CP Trail Figure 2 Regional Trail in Southeast Hennepin County - Regional Canadian Pacific Trail 0 Tentative St Loins Park Connection - Existing Trails Figure 3 Sections of the Trail Section I Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 Section 6 Figure 4 Section 1 f Todd ,► Park _ e e _ Y f T ♦♦ r In A en rive =�.V-w IL 4 _t if, r"IjIll r t 7� t Low Densinv Residential Public Facilities Q At Grade Crossing high Density Residential Green.'Open Space Retail"( ommercial D RC: PT Figure 5 Section 2 s� 1� �M t• t ernon ..rte �� �• H,"-%- 100 x' f y 1 Y. Yr . T -- -.too, .y . 't f t Lois Densin- Residential Public Facilities Q Underpass High Density- Residential Green.-Open space Q At Grade Crossing Retail, Commercial O RC PI Figure 6 Section 3 n Park r 4��, tt 1 ON Low Densinv Residential Public Facilities Q _fit Grade Crossino, High Densin. Residential Green +'open Space - Retail"Commercial D RCPT Figure 7 Section 4 _EW Memo r milli �■ �. II Highland Rd r . 11: IN ■1 ISO �_ ■�n1� am a an am am a 1 ■�■ VIII . T men agi :, 1 r� it Low Density Residential Public Facilities High Density Residential Greeni0pen Space Retail'C.ommercial O RCPT Q Underpass Figure 8 Section 5 1 � as i mil! f� Low Densin- Residential _ High Densin. Residenrial Retail.-Commercial IAVY 62 i1i11 ■ ■ w i ■ ■ ■ ■ Public Facilities = At Grade Crossing Green:Open Space Underpass RC Pi o Boardwalk Figure 9 Section 6 Dewey Hill Rd /, to Industrial IMW 1 Lo« Deusity Residential Public Facilities Q Underpass High Density Residential Green"Open Space 0 at Grade Crossing - RetaiMommercial O RCPT Figure 10 St Louis Park Zoning Districts R1- Single Family Residential R2- Single Family Residential R3 -Two Family Residential R4- Multi - Family Residential - RC- Multi - Family Residential _ C2- General Commercial - MX- Mixed -Use IP- Industrial Park }`= I - General Industrial Flood Zone RCPT Figure 11 Bloomington 78th St Public /Quasi Public a Open `'Water Commercial . Industrial/NVarehouse FI Residential FI Vacant Trail 0 2080 MMMENJ Figure 12 At Grade Crossings JOIS • U X. 6� z >z Tn0 4 STOP H UD City Road Crossing Next to Rail Road Tracks Crossing involving both Rail Road Tracks and City Road Figure 13 Section One Kr Section one shows the bike trail as it would be laid out with shared lanes for bike riders and pedestrians Figure A Section Two Section two shows the bike trail as it would be laid out with seperate laues for bike riders and pedestrians Figure B 4-,, Me+hLa Path K r.tAeri teal ���tih 13 affrt H k, IL. - ♦unih No ttrt atra ISt \r 30' rtr� - .t�S.. Section two shows the bike trail as it would be laid out with seperate laues for bike riders and pedestrians Figure B Section Three ell i Huff" HaJ _I CwMrre Section three shows the layout of the RCPT, including width of the trail, the minimum distance the trail will be from the Rail Road tracks and potential landscaping. Figure C Section Four r. a�< t. . s p•• r �. ! y. i rafts" staft . i i r } J Section four is an example of a portion of the bike trail with a steep incline. The hill has been cut away and the integreh• is maintained with retaining walls. Figure D Section Five r; t', F a y , . Section five is an example of a portion of the bike hail with a steep incline. The bill has been filled in and the Wtegrety of the bill is maintained with retaining walls. Figure E I CITY OF EDINA Regional Canadian Pacific Trail 5. Planning Study August 2006 "When residents and historians look back at this period in the Twin Cities, they will clearly identify it as the great era of bicycle trail construction. We are in the midst of creating an essential new element in the transportation and recreation systems of the 21st century. Bicycles may have been invented in the 19th century, but they are becoming even more important in the 21st." Hennepin County Commissioner Peter McLaughlin October 31, 2001 Invitation Letter to Bicycle Gaps Meeting Study Content • Benefits of Trails in General • Intent of the Regional Canadian Pacific Trail (RCPT) • Opportunities and Constraints of the RCPT • Trail Location and Connections • Assessment of the Study Area CITY OF EDINA -epared for the Edina City Council r_ `Presented by Planning Staff member Kris Kubicek Study Intent • Introduce the concept and feasibility of a trail utilizing the Canadian Pacific Rail Road right of way • Show connections within the Community and greater Minneapolis area including St Louis Park and Bloomington Benefits of Trails • Encourage Physical Activity in Residents • Alternative to Automobile dominated transportation system Intent for the RCPT • The trail will run along the CP Rail line and create a corridor of movement within Edina • Link Edina to the surrounding cities including Minneapolis • Overall the trail will create additional 4 recreation and transportation opportunities tA Opportunities • Edina is lacking Regional Trails • Provides Alternative Transportation • Safe means of travel • Means of connection to residential areas, schools, parks and trails • Trail passes near both low and high density residential areas RCPT Trail and Connections -The majority of the RCPT (4.1 miles) is contained in Edina -The Northern Portion of the Trail is in St Louis Park -The Southern Portion is in Bloomington Strengths • Edina City Council Support • Hennepin County Support • Support of Surrounding Areas Constraints Right of way being actively used as a rail line Portions of the trail encounter narrow rights of way Portions of Trail encounter areas of fully developed residential areas, some of which include private improvements such as fences and landscaping in the right of way Community is built out RCPT Trail and Connections Edina Snm. 1 snyw. i sa.M.w s Bloomington Connection to the First Tier Trail .... ,..• fFM ikt ha/ t.= I, e s St Louis Park iiiiiw w RCPT Future Connections • A Future Connection will be the First Tier Trail, which is being planned by the Three Rivers Park District (formerly Hennepin County Park District) Trail Concept Plan • Design Elements — Minimum 15 ft setback from Rails —The Trail will be 10 -12 ft minimum — The design includes two bikes lanes and shared pedestrian access I rail Cron Designs__ B Next Steps • Initiate Further contact with CP Rail by sending Report and doing follow up work • Forward Report to Bikeway Task Force CITY OF EDINA Steps Completed to Date • Initial data collected and study completed and documented • Initial communication with CP Rail made and stipulations for trail received • Held meetings with both St Louis Park and Bloomington to confirm willingness to connect trails Future Steps • Apply for federal funding for the trail • Community meetings and public outreach CITY OF EDINA Regional Canadian Pacific Trail A Planning Study A. ugust 2006 REPORT/RECOMMENDATION Recommendation: Adopt Resolution. Info/Background: In order to comply with State Statutes all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached. resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and .the recipient departments for your consideration. To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # VI. E. From: Debra Mangen Consent 0 City Clerk Information Only F] Date: August 15, 2006 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Resolution Receiving Action ® Motion Donations ❑ Resolution Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Adopt Resolution. Info/Background: In order to comply with State Statutes all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached. resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and .the recipient departments for your consideration. RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -79 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA City of Edina WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal propgrty for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Donation to the Edina Senior Center: Tony Ames - $38.00 Donations to the Edina Art Center Sarah H. Dill wood canvas stretchers $50.00 Molly Bergum General Mills Foundation $30.00 James Van Valkenburg Kitty Matthews $25.00 Michael Kelly John O'Leary $25.00 Elizabeth Eisenbrey Kathleen Sovell $25.00 Shara Mohtadi Jay Frigard $25.00 Rita Corrigan Nancy Acker $25.00 Pamela Luer Arlene Green $25.00 Wendy Sallman Lauren Gregorian $25.00 Mary Gould Pottery supplies Donation to the Braemar Memorial Fund for future Golf Course equipment purchases: Duane Blake' $50.00 Daniel Geske State Farm Companies $500.00 Midwest Investment Advisors D W Steinkamp $30.00 Ivan Roberson $30.00 Dated: August 15, 2006 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF FIENNEPIN)SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor $35.00 $50.00 $500.00 $100.00 $25.0c' $251 $20.00 $10.00 $700.00 $15.00 $15.00 CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 15, 2006 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of . 20_. City Clerk City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 -826 -0379 ow e •fry � • i�l;eee REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item VI-F. From: HEATHER WORTHINGTON Consent 1:1 ASST CITY MANAGER Information Only ❑ Date: AUGUST 15, 2006 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: LEASE AGREEMENT - ® Motion CELL ANTENNA — ❑ Resolution VANVALKENBURG ❑ Ordinance WATER TOWER ❑ Discussion RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this lease agreement with T- Mobile Central LLC for the VanValkenburg Water Tower. INFORMATION/BACKGROUND: The Council is being asked to consider a 5 -year lease with T- Mobile for an antenna on the VanValkenburg Water Tower. This antenna will be similar in structure to other cell antennae on that water tower, and will not interfere with the regular operation of those antennae. This lease shall pay the City $15,000 per year, with an option to extend this lease in five -year increments. If the lease is extended past the initial five -year period, T- Mobile will be required to increase their lease payments by the greater of (a) twenty percent of the previous five -year lease term rental; or (b) by an amount equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) during the previous five - year lease term. Further, T- Mobile is required to pay for any and all engineering, interference study, and other consultant costs related to the installation of this antenna. REPORT /RECOMMENDATION - Lease Agreement - VanValkenburg Water Tower August 15, 2006 Page two The use of this antenna site by T- Mobile is subordinate to the use of the site for City, public safety, or other governmental agency use. If T- Mobile decides to add to the allowed six antennae in this agreement, they will pay the City $1,000 per each additional antenna, up to a total of six additional antennae. T Mobile will separately meter charges for the consumption of water, gas and electricity, and any other utilities associated with the use of the property. If the City needs to paint the water tower during the period of the lease, T- Mobile agrees to remove their antennae and mount them on a temporary support structure. Finally, T- Mobile agrees to maintain general liability coverage in the amount of $5,000,000 for each occurrence; $1,000,000 personal and advertising injury; $2,000,000 general aggregate; and $2,000,000 products and. completed operations aggregate. The City may terminate this lease with 60 days written notice for a variety of events and conditions outlined on page 11 of the lease agreement. r, CITY OF EDINA ANTENNA LEASE AGREEMENT WITH T- MOBILE CENTRAL LLC, FOR VAN VALKENBURG WATER TOWER TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. LEASED PREMISES ...................................................................... ..............................1 2. RENT ...........................................................................,.................... .......................:......1 (a) Amount, Adjustments ....................................................................... ....................,.........1 (b) Additional Rent ................................................................................ ..............................2 (c) Time of Payment, Taxes .................................................................. ..............................2 3. GOVERNMENTAL APPROVAL CONTINGENCY .................... ..............................2 (a) Tenant Application ........................................................................... ..............................2 (b) Interference Study ... .. .........................: (c) Non - approval ................................................................................... ..............................3 4. TERM, AND RENEWALS ............................................................. ..............................3 5. TENANT'S USE ............................................................................. ..............................3 a User Priority 3 (b) Purposes ..... ....................................................................................... ..............................4 (c) Construction and Maintenance Standards ........................................ ..............................4 (d) Increase in Antenna Number ........................................................... ..............................4 (e) Damage to the Leased Property or Facilities ................................... ..............................5 (f) Operation .......................................................................................... ........................:.....5 (g) Maintenance, Improvement, and Replacement Expenses ................ ..............................6 (h) Replacements ................................................................................... ..............................6 (i) Drawings .......................................................................................... ..............................6 0) No Interference ................................................................................ ..............................6 (k) Access .............................................................................................. ..............................6 (1) Costs Associated with Tenant's Use of Leased Property ................ ..............................7 6. EMERGENCY FACILITY ............................................................. ..............................7 7. ADDITIONAL TENANT MAINTENANCE EXPENSES, REQUIREMENTS, AND OBLIGATIONS................................................................................................. ..............................7 8. LEASED PROPERTY TAKEN "AS IS" ........................................ ..............................8 9. ADDITIONAL BUILDINGS .......................................................... ..............................8 10. DEFENSE AND INDEMNIFICATION ......................................... ..............................8 (a) General ............................................................................................. ..............................8 (b) Hazardous Materials ........................................................................ ..............................8 (c) Tenant's Warrant ............................................................................. ..............................8 -i- J T r 11. INSURANCE ................................................................................... ..............................9 (a) Workers' Compensation .................................................................. ..............................9 (b) General Liability .............................................................................. ..............................9 (c) Automobile Liability ....................................................................... .............................10 (d) Tenant Property Insurance .............................................................. .............................10 (e) Hazardous Materials Coverage ....................................................... .............................10 12. DAMAGE OR DESTRUCTION .................................................... .............................10 13. LEASE TERMINATION ............................................................... .............................10 (a) Events of Termination .................................................................... ..............................1 I (b) Tenant's Liability for Early Termination ........................................ .............................12 (c) Site Restoration ............................................................................... .............................12 14. LIMITATION OF LANDLORD'S LIABILITY ............................ .............................13 15. TEMPORARY INTERRUPTIONS OF SERVICE ........................ .............................13 16. TENANT INTERFERENCE .......................................................... .............................13 (a) With Water Tower .......................................................................... .............................13 (b) With Higher Priority Users ............................................................. .............................13 (c) Interference Study - New Occupants .............................................. .............................14 (d) Interference - New Occupants ........................................................ .............................14 17. ASSIGNMENT ............................................................................... .............................14 18. CONDEMNATION ........................................................................ .............................15 19. DISPUTES ...................................................................................... .............................15 20. HOLD OVER .................................................................................. .............................15 21. ENFORCEMENT AND ATTORNEYS' FEES ............................. .............................15 22. NOTICES ........................................................................................ .............................15 23. AUTHORITY ... .............................................................................. .............................16 24. BINDING EFFECT ........................................................................ .............................16 25. COMPLETE LEASE; AMENDMENTS ........................................ .............................16 26. GOVERNING LAW ....................................................................... .............................16 27. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY ...................................................... .............................16 -11- T 28. SEVERABILITY ............................................................................ .............................16 29. MEMORANDUM .......................................................................... .............................16 -iii- SITE LEASE AGREEMENT THIS SITE LEASE AGREEMENT ( "Lease ") is made this day of , 2006, between the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, ( "Landlord "), and T- Mobile Central LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ( "Tenant "). For good and valuable consideration, the Parties agree as follows: 1. Leased Premises. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Lease, Landlord hereby leases to Tenant and Tenant leases from Landlord the right to install and place on the Van Valkenburg Water Tower ( "Water Tower ") a minimum of 6 and up to a maximum of 12 cellular phone antennas located — feet above ground level, as shown on Exhibit A attached hereto., Further, as also shown on Exhibit A, Landlord leases to Tenant a _ foot by _ foot ground compound, which will be located a minimum of 15 feet from the drip line of the Water Tower, together with a non - exclusive easement for reasonable access thereto and for adequate utility services. The legal description for the property on which the ground compound and Water Tower are located is as described on the attached Exhibit B (the "Leased Premises "). This Lease shall be subject to any and all existing easements. The exact location of the directional antennas, connecting cables and appurtenances on the Leased Premises will be as reasonably approved by Landlord's Director of Public Works, as indicated on Exhibit A. Tenant agrees that all connecting cables between the tower and the compound shall be underground per the engineering diagrams provided by Tenant. The Landlord makes no representations as to whether the real estate interests set forth in Exhibit A are sufficient for Tenant's purposes. If Tenant requires real estate rights in addition to those owned by the Landlord in the real estate described in Exhibit A, Tenant shall pay the entire cost, including reasonable attorney fees, of obtaining said additional real estate rights. If Tenant requires such additional real estate rights, Landlord shall cooperate with Tenant in Tenant's efforts to secure such rights. Tenant agrees to indemnify and hold Landlord harmless from any and all claims, costs, losses, expenses, demands, actions, or causes of action, including reasonable attorneys' fees and other costs and expenses of litigation, which may be asserted against or incurred by Landlord in connection with Tenant's real or alleged lack of sufficient real estate rights in the Leased Premises. The indemnification in this section shall be in addition to all other defense and indemnification agreements contained elsewhere in this Lease. 2. Rent. (a) Amount, Adjustments. As consideration for this Lease, Tenant shall pay to the Landlord rent in the amount of $15,000.00 per year for the initial 5 year lease term. Tenant agrees the annual rental amount will be increased during each new 5 year lease term by the greater of: (a) twenty percent (20 %) of the previous 5 year lease term rental, or (b) by an amount equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index ( "CPP') during the previous 5 year lease term. The CPI shall mean the "Consumer Price Index - for All Urban Consumers, Minneapolis -St. Paul (CPI- "), All Items (1984 = 100)" as published by the United States Department of Labor Statistics, or if such index shall be discontinued, the successor index, or if there shall be no successor index, such comparable index as mutually agreed upon by the parties. To determine the lease term rental increase to be paid by Tenant under a CPI adjuster, the monthly rental for the previous 5 year term shall be multiplied by a percentage figure computed from a fraction, the numerator of which shall be the CPI for the most recently available quarter, and the denominator of which shall be the CPI for the corresponding quarter five years earlier. Such fraction shall be converted to a percentage equivalent. The resulting percentage figure shall be multiplied by the previous lease term's rent (annualized for the first year, see Section 4 below). (b) Additional Rent. In addition to the annual rental payments, Tenant agrees to pay to Landlord the full amount of any real estate taxes, personal property taxes, or payments in lieu thereof, which Landlord is assessed as a result of this Lease. Tenant shall pay the amount of said tax or payment to Landlord within thirty (30) days after written notice from Landlord of said tax or payment amount, or at least ten (10) business days prior to the due date of said tax or payment, whichever is later. (c) Time of Payment, Taxes. Landlord shall communicate all rental increases to the Tenant in writing by the preceding December 1 of each year. The annual rental shall be paid before January 1 of each year. For the first year, the rental shall be pro rated through December 31 and shall be paid to Landlord in full at the time Lease is executed. If the Tenant does not meet the requirements referenced in Section 3(a) below by , and Tenant has diligently pursued such requirements, Landlord shall refund the Tenant rental payment made at the time of Lease execution and this Lease shall terminate. 3. Governmental Approval Contingency. (a) Tenant Application. Tenant's right to use the Leased Premises is expressly made contingent upon its obtaining all certificates, permits, zoning and other approvals that may be required by any federal, state, or local authority. This shall include the engineering study specified in Section 3(b) below on the Water Tower to be conducted at Tenant's expense. Landlord shall cooperate with Tenant in its efforts to obtain and retain such approvals and shall take no action which would adversely affect the status of the Leased Premises with respect to the Tenant's proposed use thereof. (b) Interference Study. Before obtaining a building permit, Tenant must pay for the cost of (i) a radio frequency interference study carried out by an independent and qualified professional selected by the Landlord showing that Tenant's intended use will not interfere with any existing communications facilities and (ii) an engineering study showing that the Water Tower is able to support the Tenant's Antenna Facilities, as defined in Section 5(b), without prejudice to the City's use of the Water Tower. If the study finds that there is a potential for interference that cannot be reasonably remedied or for prejudice to the Water Tower, Landlord may terminate this Lease immediately and refund the initial rental to Tenant. -2- (c) Non - approval. In the event that any application necessary under Section 3(a) above is finally rejected or any certificate, permit, license, or approval issued to Tenant is canceled, expires, lapses, or is otherwise withdrawn or terminated by governmental authority so that Tenant, in its sole discretion, will be unable to use the Leased Premises for its intended purposes, Tenant shall have the right to terminate this Lease and be reimbursed for any rental payments made prior to Tenant's installation. Notice of Tenant's exercise of its right to terminate shall be given to Landlord in writing by certified mail, return receipt requested, and shall be effective upon receipt of such notice by Landlord as evidenced by the return receipt. Except as required under Section 13(c) below, upon such termination, this Lease shall become null and void and the parties shall have no further obligations to each other. 4. Term, and Renewals. The "Initial Term" of this Lease shall commence on the earlier of the date the Tenant begins construction on the Leased Premises, or November 1, 2006 ( "Effective Date "), and shall end on December 31 of the fifth calendar year of the Lease. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Lease, Tenant shall have the right to extend this Lease for four (4) additional five (5) year lease terms ( "Renewal Term ") commencing on January 1 following the expiration date of the Initial Term or of any subsequent Renewal Term. This Lease shall be automatically renewed for each successive Renewal Term unless Tenant sends written notice of non - renewal to Landlord no later than ninety (90) days prior to the expiration of the Initial Term or any Renewal Term, such notice to be provided in accordance with Section 22 of this Lease. In addition to the rental increase for the Renewal Terms provided by Section 2, Tenant agrees to pay Landlord an additional $1,000 as a renewal fee each time a Renewal Term begins. The renewal fee shall be payable on or before November 30th of the Renewal Term. 5. Tenant's Use. (a) User Priority. Tenant agrees that the following priorities of use, in descending order, shall apply in the event of communication interference or other conflict while this Lease is in effect, and Tenant's use shall be subordinate accordingly: 1. Landlord; 2. Public safety agencies, including law enforcement, fire, and ambulance services, that are not part of the Landlord; 3. Other governmental agencies where use is not related to public safety; and 4. Tenant and other government regulated entities whose antennas offer a service to the general public for a fee, in a manner similar to a public utility, such as long distance and cellular telephone, but not including radio or television broadcasters. -3- Subject to higher priority users as set forth herein and pre- existing tenants in the same priority category, Tenant shall have preference over subsequent tenants in same priority category for locating Tenant's temporary antenna support structure and equipment facilities, which structure is referred to in Sections 6 and 7, and for other such issues which may cause a conflict among tenants in the same priority category. (b) Purposes. Tenant shall use the Leased Premises only for the purpose of installing, maintaining, and operating a Landlord- approved (which approval shall not'be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed) communications antenna facility, equipment, and cabinets, and uses incidental thereto for providing radio and wireless telecommunication services which Tenant is legally authorized to provide to the public. This use shall be nonexclusive to the extent that the Landlord specifically reserves the right to enter onto the Leased Premises, inspect Tenant's "Antenna Facilities" (hereinafter defined), and allow the Landlord's property, except the Leased Premises, to be used by other parties, and to make additions, deletions, or modifications to Landlord's own facilities on the Leased Premises. Otherwise, the Leased Premises on the ground should be considered exclusive, and the Antenna Support Structure (the Water Tower) is non - exclusive. Tenant's communications antenna facilities ( "Antenna Facilities ") shall consist of antennas at a Landlord- approved location as indicated on Exhibit A (which Landlord- approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed), along with cables and appurtenances connected to an accessory building (the "Building") constructed and located on the Leased Premises, which Building will house all of Tenant's equipment maintained on the ground. Tenant shall comply with all applicable ordinances, statutes and regulations of local, state and federal government agencies. (c) Construction and Maintenance Standards. Consistent with this Lease, Tenant may erect and operate antenna arrays as reasonably approved by Landlord's Director of Public Works. Tenant shall comply with all construction and maintenance standards set forth in the City Code. Tenant shall, at its sole expense maintain the Antenna Facilities in good condition throughout the term of this Lease, install and maintain the Antenna Facilities in accordance with standard good engineering practices and conform, when applicable with the National Electrical Safety Code and applicable other federal, state and local laws or regulations. Tenant shall construct the Building on the Leased Premises, which Building's exterior shall have a stone aggregate finish or such exterior approved by the Director of Public Works. Tenant shall also install fencing that is uniform with and ties into the existing fence of Sprint Spectrum LP (a pre - existing tenant). If during the term of this Lease or any renewal thereof, the surrounding landscaping or tree line changes such that the ground equipment is no longer sheltered from public view, Landlord may require Tenant, at Tenant's expense, to landscape the Leased Premises and adjacent areas as necessary to reasonably screen the ground compound from view from any public street. (d) Increase in Antenna Number. If Tenant wishes to increase the number of antennas to more than 6 (up to a maximum of 12), Tenant must obtain the written -4- consent of Landlord, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned,' or delayed. Upon the Landlord's consent, the rental amount shall be increased by $1,000.00 per each additional antenna (for example, if 6 antennas were added for a total of 12 antennas, the annual rental would be increased by $6,000.00 for a total of $21,000.00). All rental increases shall be prorated on a calendar month basis if the antennas are consented to during the middle of any calendar year, and in such case the increased rental amount shall be due and payable to Landlord within 30 days after the Landlord's consent to the additional antennas. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, if Tenant obtains Landlord's consent to install more than 6 antennas (up to a maximum of 12 antennas), and Tenant installs the additional antennas as part of its initial installation, then the rental amount shall be increased by the amount set forth herein as of the Effective Date of the Lease, and not the date of Landlord's consent, -and such increased rental amount shall be due and payable to Landlord within 30 days after Landlord's consent to the installation of such additional antennas.,, If antennas are added during a Renewal Term, the additional rent will be computed as if the antennas were added during the Initial Term. For example, this means that if 6 antennas are added during a Renewal Term, the rental payment shall be computed as if the annual rent was $21,000.00 during the Initial Term, using this increased amount to calculate the increases to the annual rent for each subsequent Renewal Term accordingly. (e) Damage to the Leased Property or Facilities. If the Leased Premises or a portion of the Leased Premises is damaged during the term of this Lease and such Leased Premises would not have been damaged but for the installation, maintenance or operation of the Antenna Facilities, Tenant shall repair or rebuild the Leased Premises to substantially the condition in which the Leased Premises was immediately prior to such damage. (f) Qperation. Tenant shall complete all required landscaping and clean-up of the site, including repairing of damaged areas of the support structure, within thirty (30) days after final installation of the antenna and ground equipment. If Tenant fails to complete said landscaping and clean-up, Tenant shall pay to Landlord the amount of Twenty -Five and No /00 Dollars ($25.00) for every calendar day said landscaping an clean-up remains uncompleted, beginning on the thirty-first (31 st) day after final installation of the antenna and ground equipment. Provided, however, that if Tenant is delayed at any time in completing said landscaping and clean-up by reason of labor disputes, unavailability of materials, weather conditions, usual delays in deliveries, unavoidable casualties or any other causes beyond Tenant's control, then the completion date shall be extended by the number of days equal to the days of such delay. Provided also, that Tenant shall have no obligation to complete any landscaping which Landlord, in Landlord's sole discretion, waives as being not necessary for screening the ground compound from public view. Tenant shall otherwise have the right, at its sole cost and expense, to operate and maintain the Antenna Facilities on the Leased Premises in accordance with good engineering practices and all applicable FCC rules and regulations. Tenant's installation of all Antenna Facilities shall be done according to plans approved by Landlord, which approval shall not be unreasonably -5- withheld, conditioned, or delayed. Any damage done to the Leased Premises or other Landlord property including the Water Tower during installation or during operations, shall be repaired at Tenant's expense within 30 days after notification of damage. The Antenna Facilities shall remain the exclusive property of the Tenant except as otherwise provided in Section 13(c) of this Lease. (g) Maintenance, Improvement, and Replacement Expenses. All modifications and improvements to the Leased Premises and all improvements made for Tenant's benefit shall be at the Tenant's expense, and such improvements, including antenna, facilities and equipment, shall be maintained in a good state of repair, at least equal to the standard of maintenance of the Landlord's facilities on or adjacent to the Leased Premises, and shall be secured by Tenant. If Tenant's Antenna Facilities are mounted on the Water Tower they shall, at all times, be painted, at Tenant's expense, the same color as the Water Tower. (h) Replacements. Before the Tenant may modify, improve, or replace its Building or antennas, other than to make repairs, Tenant must notify and provide a detailed proposal to Landlord. Tenant shall submit to Landlord thirty (30) days prior to commencement of such work a detailed proposal for any such modified, improved, or replacement facilities, and any other information reasonably requested by Landlord relating to such requested update or replacement, including but not limited to a technical study, carried out at Tenant's expense. Landlord will provide notice of approval or denial within thirty(30) days of receiving all needed information from Tenant, or approval will be deemed given to Tenant. (i) Drawings. Tenant shall provide Landlord with as -built drawings of the equipment and improvements installed on the Leased Premises, which show the actual location of all Antenna Facilities. Said drawings shall be accompanied by a complete and detailed inventory of all equipment, personal property, and Antenna Facilities actually placed on the Leased Premises. (j) No Interference. Tenant shall, at its own expense, maintain any equipment on or attached to the Leased Premises in a safe condition, in good repair and in a manner suitable to Landlord so as not to conflict with the use of the surrounding premises by Landlord. Tenant shall not unreasonably interfere with the operations of any prior tenant using the Water Tower, and shall not interfere with the working use of the water storage facilities thereon or to be placed thereon by Landlord. (k) Access. Tenant, at all times during this Lease, shall have access to the Leased Premises in order to install, operate, and maintain its Antenna Facilities. Tenant shall have access to the Water Tower only with the approval of Landlord. Tenant shall request access to the Water Tower twenty -four (24) hours in advance, except in an emergency, and Landlord's approval thereof shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed. In the event it is necessary for Tenant to have access to the Water Tower at some time other than the normal working hours of Landlord, Landlord may charge Tenant for whatever expense, including employees' wages, that Landlord may incur in providing such access to Tenant. 0 (1) Costs Associated with Tenant's Use of Leased Property. A. Tenant shall be solely responsible for any incremental increases in Landlord's expenses resulting from Tenant's exercise of any rights under this Lease. Such expenses shall include but not be limited to increased costs for water, gas, electricity, sewer, tielephone and other utilities, maintenance costs, security costs, and insurance premiums. Tenant shall be solely responsible for any costs incurred in securing the Antenna, Facilities from theft, vandalism or any other damage. B. Tenant shall separately meter charges for the consumption of water, gas, electricity, and other utilities associated with its use of the Leased Property and shall pay all costs associated therewith. Landlord shall not be liable and this Lease shall not be affected in any way by the interruption or impairment of any utility service necessary for operation of the Facilities. 6. Emergency Facility. In the event of a natural or man made disaster, in order to protect the health, welfare, and safety of the community, Tenant may erect additional Antenna Facilities and install additional equipment on a temporary basis an the Leased Premises to assure continuation of service. Such temporary operation shall not exceed 90 days unless Tenant obtains written approval from the Landlord. 7. Additional Tenant Maintenance Expenses, Requirements, and Obligations. As part of the regular maintenance of the Water Tower, during the course of the Lease, Landlord may from time to time paint the Water Tower. In such case, upon 30 days' prior written notice from Landlord, Tenant will remove all of its cellular phone antennas from the Water Tower. Tenant shall then be allowed to locate its antennas on a temporary antenna support structure provided by Tenant. Such temporary antenna support structure may be located in the immediate vicinity of the Water Tower, at such a location that will allow the antennas to operate for Tenant's intended purpose, but which will not interfere with the painting of the Water Tower. Upon completion of the painting of the Water Tower, Landlord shall provide written notice to Tenant of same, and Tenant shall promptly reinstall its antennas on the Water Tower, and Tenant shall further remove the temporary antenna support structure from the Leased Premises. Tenant shall also, at that time, have its antennas painted the same color as the Water Tower. All Tenant's actions described in this section shall be done at Tenant's sole cost and expense. Tenant agrees that all of Tenant's obligations contained in this Lease, including but not limited to, defense, indemnification, and insurance obligations, shall continue during such time as Tenant's antennas are removed from the Water Tower, and shall be extended to cover Tenant's activities on the Leased Premises, specifically including but not limited to, the presence and operation of Tenant's temporary antenna support structure. In addition, upon prior written notice from Landlord, Tenant agrees to promptly pay to Landlord all additional Landlord expenses incurred in maintaining the Leased Premises, including painting or other maintenance of the Water Tower, that are caused by Tenant's occupancy of the Leased Premises. Upon prior written notice from Landlord, Tenant further agrees to cooperate with Landlord in the performance of any maintenance of the Water Tower, including turning down the cell site when maintenance workers are in the immediate vicinity of the antennas; provided, however, that Tenant has the right to leave its antennas -7- in place during any such maintenance of -the Water Tower, which maintenance does not including painting. 8. Leased Property Taken "As Is ". Tenant takes and accepts the Leased Premises in "as is" condition. Taking possession of the Leased Premises by Tenant shall be conclusive evidence that the Leased Premises was, on that date, in good tenantable condition. Tenant acknowledges that no representations as to the repair of the Leased Premises or promises to alter, remodel or improve the Leased Premises have been made by Landlord. 9. Additional Buildings. Tenant acknowledges that Landlord may permit additional facilities to be constructed on the property described in Exhibit B. At such time as this may occur, Tenant will permit said facilities to be placed immediately adjacent to Tenant's facilities however adjacent facilities must not impede access to o, perations or maintenance of Tenant's facilities. 10. Defense and Indemnification. (a) General. Tenant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless Landlord and its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and representatives, from and against any and all claims, costs, losses, expenses, demands, liabilities, actions, or causes of action, including reasonable attorneys' fees and other costs and expenses of litigation (collectively the "Claims and Costs "), which may be asserted against Landlord by third parties or incurred by Landlord or for which Landlord may be liable to third parties as a result of the performance of this Lease, except to the extent that the Claims and Costs arise from the negligence, willful misconduct, or other fault of Landlord, its employees or agents. Tenant shall defend all claims arising out of the installation, operation, use, maintenance, repair, removal, or presence of Tenant's Antenna Facilities, equipment and related facilities on the Leased Premises. The obligation of this section shall survive the expiration and term sections of this Lease. (b) Hazardous Materials. Without limiting the scope of Section 10(a) above, Tenant will be solely responsible for and will defend, indemnify, and hold harmless Landlord and its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and representatives, from and against any and all claims, costs, losses, expenses, demands, liabilities, actions, or causes of action, including reasonable attorneys' fees and other costs and expenses of litigation, arising out of or in connection with any cleanup or restoration of the Leased Premises associated with Tenant's use of Hazardous Materials or other regulated substance. For purposes of this Lease, "Hazardous Materials" shall be interpreted broadly and specifically includes, without limitation, asbestos, fuel, batteries or any hazardous substance, waste, or materials as defined in any federal, state, or local environmental or safety law or regulations including, but not limited to, CERCLA. The obligation of this section shall survive the expiration and term sections of this Lease. (c) Tenant's Warranty. Tenant represents and warrants that its use of the Leased Premises will not generate, and Tenant will not store or dispose of on the Leased Premises, nor transport to or over the Leased Premises, any Hazardous Materials, unless Tenant specifically informs Landlord thereof in writing twenty -four hours -8- prior to such storage, disposal oftransport, or otherwise as soon as Tenant becomes aware of the existence of Hazardous Materials on the Leased Premises. The obligation of this section shall survive the expiration and term sections of this Lease; provided, however, that Tenant may store and use on the Leased Premises back -up power batteries in types and quantities that are customary for installations such as the Antenna Facilities.. Tenant will handle, store and use all such batteries in a safe manner so as not to permit any contamination to result from handling, storage and use, and otherwise in compliance with all applicable laws. 11. Insurance. (a) Workers' Compensation. The Tenant must maintain Workers' Compensation insurance in compliance with all applicable statutes. The policy shall also provide Employer's Liability coverage with limits of not less than $500,000 Bodily Injury each accident, $500,000 Bodily Injury by disease, policy limit, and $500,000 Bodily Injury by disease, each employee. (b) General Liability. The Tenant must maintain an occurrence form comprehensive general liability coverage. Such coverage shall include, but not be limited to, bodily injury, property damage -- broad form, and personal injury, for the hazards of Premises /Operation, broad form contractual liability, independent contractors, and products /completed operations. The Tenant must maintain the aforementioned comprehensive general liability coverage with limits of liability not less than $5,000,000 each occurrence; $1,000,000 personal and advertising injury; $2,000,000 general aggregate; and $2,000,000 products and completed operations aggregate. These limits may be satisfied by the comprehensive general liability coverage or in combination with an umbrella or excess liability policy, provided coverage afforded by the umbrella or excess policy are no less than the underlying comprehensive general liability coverages. Tenant will maintain Completed Operations coverage for a minimum of two years after the construction is completed. The following endorsements shall attach to the liability policy: (1) The policy shall cover personal injury as well as bodily injury. (2) The policy shall cover blanket contractual liability subject to the standard universal exclusions of contractual liability included in the carrier's standard endorsement as to bodily injuries, personal injuries and property damage. (3) Broad form property damage liability shall be afforded. (4) The Landlord shall be named as an additional insured on the policy. R1 (5) An endorsement shall be provided which states that the coverage is primary insurance and that no other insurance effected by the Landlord will be called upon to contribute to a loss under this coverage. (6) Standard form of cross - liability shall be afforded. (7) An endorsement stating that the policy shall not be canceled without thirty (30) days' written notice of such cancellation to the Landlord. (c) Automobile Liability. The Tenant must carry Automobile Liability coverage with total liability limits for Bodily injury Liability and Property Damage Liability in the amount of $1,000,000 per accident. The liability limits may be afforded under the Commercial Policy, or in combination with an Umbrella or Excess Liability Policy provided coverages afforded by the Umbrella Excess Policy are no less than the underlying Commercial Auto Liability coverage. Coverage.,shall be provided for Bodily Injury and Property Damage for the ownership, use, maintenance or operation of all owned, non -owned and hired automobiles, The Commercial Automobile Policy shall include at least statutory personal injury protection, uninsured motorists and underinsured motorists coverages. (d) Tenant Property Insurance. The Tenant must keep in force during the term and any renewals of the Lease a policy covering damages to its property at the Leased Premises. The amount of coverage shall be sufficient to replace the damaged property, loss of use and comply with any ordinance or law requirements. (e) Hazardous Materials Coverage. Tenant must carry sufficient coverage, if applicable, to the reasonable satisfaction of Landlord, for damage caused by Hazardous Materials. It shall be the obligation of the Tenant to notify the Landlord promptly of any pending or threatened litigation that would be likely to affect any of its insurance coverage required under this Lease. Tenant shall provide the Landlord with a certificate evidencing all insurance required under this section on or before the Effective. Date of this Lease. 12. Damage or Destruction. If the Leased Premises is destroyed or damaged without contributory fault of the Tenant or its agents, so as, in Tenant's judgment, to hinder its effective use of the Antenna Facilities, Tenant may elect to terminate this Lease upon 30 days' written notice to Landlord. In the event Tenant elects to terminate the Lease under this section, Tenant shall be entitled to reimbursement of prepaid rent covering the period subsequent to the date of damage to or destruction of the Leased Premises. 13. Lease Termination. -10- r (a) Events of Termination. Except as otherwise provided herein, this Lease may be terminated upon sixty (60) days written notice to the other party as follows: (1) ' By Landlord or Tenant if Tenant fails to complete installation of its Antenna Facilities or otherwise use the Leased Premises in the manner described herein by April 1, 2007; ' (2) By Landlord if Tenant sells or attempts to sell its interest in the Leased Premises under execution or similar legal process; (3) By Landlord if a receiver or trustee is appointed for Tenant's business or property and such appointment is not vacated within thirty (30) days of the date of such appointment; (4) By Landlord if Tenant makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors; (5) By Landlord if Tenant's interest under this Lease automatically passes to any other person or entity by operation of law, except as otherwise expressly permitted by the terms of this Lease; (6) By either party upon a default of any covenant or term hereof by the other party, which default is not cured within sixty (60) days of receipt of written notice of default to the other party (without, however, limiting any other rights of the parties pursuant to any other provisions hereof); provided that if the party in default has commenced curing the default within said sixty (60) day period, it shall have, additional time to cure the default as is reasonably required, as long as it proceeds diligently to cure the default; (7) By Tenant for cause if it is unable to obtain or maintain any license, permit or other governmental approval necessary for the construction or operation of the Antenna Facilities or Tenant's business; (8) By Landlord, upon one (1) year's prior written notice to Tenant, if Landlord's governing body decides, for any reason, to redevelop the Leased Premises in a manner inconsistent with continued use of the Leased Premises by Tenant and, or decides to demolish and discontinue use of the Water Tower for all purposes; (9) By Landlord if it determines in its reasonable discretion that the Water Tower is structurally unsound, including, but not limited to, consideration of age of the Water Tower, damage or destruction of all or part of the Water Tower on the Leased Premises from any source, or factors relating to condition of the Leased Premises; (10) By Landlord if, as a result of a request from a potential user with a higher priority under Section 4(a) above, Landlord determines that such user cannot find another adequate location, or the Antenna Facilities unreasonably interfere with another user with a higher priority, regardless -11- of whether or not such an. interference was predicted in the initial interference study that was part of the application process, provided that for a one year period after termination under this Section, Landlord shall not lease the Leased Premises to another party with equal or lesser priority for the same use as that of Tenant, or (11) By Landlord if it determines that Tenant has failed to comply with applicable ordinances, or state or federal law, or any conditions attached to government approvals granted thereunder, after a public hearing before the Landlord's governing body pursuant to such applicable ordinance, or state or federal law. Upon the occurrence of any event triggering a right to terminate this Lease, the party seeking 'to terminate the Lease shall provide the other party at least thirty (30) days written notice, by certified mail, return receipt requested, of its intent to terminate this Lease. If the termination notice is based on a default of Section 2 of this Lease, the defaulting party shall be allowed fifteen (15) days from the date it receives such notice to cure its default. If the default is not cured within fifteen (15) days, Landlord may elect to terminate this Lease. If the termination notice is based on any other default event, the defaulting party shall be allowed thirty (30) days from the date it receives such notice to cure its default. If such default is not cured within thirty (30) days, the non defaulting party may elect to terminate this Lease. (b) Tenant's Liability for Early Termination. If Tenant terminates this Lease other than of right as provided in this Lease, the entire annual rent for the year in which the termination takes place shall be retained by Landlord. Further, the Tenant shall pay to Landlord, as, liquidated damages for early termination, 150 % of the annual rent for the year in which the termination takes place, unless Tenant terminates during the last year of any term under Section 4 and Tenant has paid the annual rental for that year. If Tenant terminates this Lease pursuant to Section 13(a)(1), rent will be prorated through April 1, 2007. (c) Site Restoration. In the event that this Lease is terminated or not renewed, Tenant shall have 60 days from the termination or expiration date to remove its Antenna Facilities and related equipment from the Leased Premises, repair and restore the Leased Premises and any adjacent site, and restore the surface of the Water Tower. Upon commencement of this Lease, Tenant shall deposit with Landlord the sum of $5,000.00, which shall be fully refunded to Tenant upon the timely removal of the Antenna Facilities and related equipment, and the repair and restoration of the Leased Premises and any adjacent site, and the restoration of the Water Tower surface, all to the reasonable satisfaction of the Landlord. In the event that Tenant's Antennas Facilities and related equipment are not removed within the 60 days and to the reasonable satisfaction of the Landlord, Tenant's Antennas Facilities shall be deemed abandoned and become the property of the Landlord, and Tenant shall have no further rights thereto. -12- If Landlord removes the Antenna'Facilities or related equipment, Landlord must give written notice to the Tenant at the addresses provided, informing them that Antenna Facilities or related property have been removed and will be, deemed abandoned if not claimed and the storage fees and other reasonable costs paid within thirty (30) days of the written notice. 14. Limitation of Landlord's Liability. If Landlord terminates this Lease other than as of right as provided in this Lease, or Landlord causes interruption of the business of Tenant or for any other Landlord breach of this Lease, Landlord's liability for damages to Tenant shall be limited to the actual and direct costs of equipment removal, relocation or repair, and shall specifically exclude any recovery for value of the business of Tenant as a going concern, for future expectation of profits, or for loss of business or profit or related damages to Tenant. 15. Temporary Interruptions of Service. If Landlord determines that continued operation of the Antenna Facilities would cause or contribute to an immediate threat to public health or safety (except for any issues associated with human exposure to radio frequency omissions, which is regulated by the Federal Government), Landlord may order Tenant to discontinue its operation. Tenant shall immediately comply with such an order. Service shall be discontinued only for the period that the immediate threat exists. If Landlord does not give prior notice to Tenant, Landlord shall notify Tenant as soon as possible after its action and give its reason for taking the action, Landlord shall not be liable to Tenant or any third party for any interruption in Tenant's service or interference with Tenant's operation of its Antenna Facilities, except as may be caused by the willful misconduct of the Landlord, its employees or agents. If the discontinuance extends for a period greater than three days, either consecutively or cumulatively, Tenant shall have the right to terminate this Lease within its sole discretion. 16. Tenant Interference. (a) With Water Tower. Tenant shall not interfere with Landlord's use of the Water Tower and agrees to cease all such actions which unreasonably and materially interfere with Landlord's use thereof no later than 48 hours after receipt of written notice of the interference from Landlord. In the event that Tenant's cessation of action is material to Tenant's use of the Leased. Premises and such cessation frustrates Tenant's use of the Leased Premises, within Tenant's sole discretion, Tenant shall have the immediate right to terminate this Lease. (b) With Higher Priority Users. If Tenant's Antenna Facilities cause impermissible interference with higher priority users as set forth in under Section 5(a) above or with pre- existing tenants, Tenant shall take all measures necessary to correct and eliminate the interference. If the interference cannot be eliminated within 48 hours after receiving Landlord's written notice of the interference, Tenant shall immediately cease operating its Antenna Facilities and shall not reactivate operation, except intermittent operation for the purpose of testing, until the interference has been eliminated. If the interference cannot be eliminated within 30 days after Tenant received Landlord's written notice, Landlord may at its option terminate this Lease immediately without paying liquidated damages to Tenant. -13- (c) Interference Study - New Occupants. Upon written notice by Landlord that it has a bona fide request from any other party to lease an area including or in close proximity to the Leased Premises ( "Leased Premises Area "), Tenant agrees to provide Landlord, within sixty (60) days, the radio frequencies currently in operation or to be operated in the future of each transmitter and receiver installed and operational by Tenant on the Leased Premises at the time of such request, Landlord may then have an independent, registered professional engineer of Landlord's choosing perform the necessary interference studies to determine if the new applicant's frequencies will cause harmful radio interference to Tenant. Landlord shall require the new applicant to pay for such interference studies, unless the Landlord or other higher priority user requests the use. In that event, the Tenant and all other tenants occupying the Leased Premises Area shall pay for the necessary interference studies, pro rata. (d) Interference - New Occupants. Landlord agrees that it will not grant a future lease in the Leased Premises Area to any party who is of equal or lower priority to Tenant, if 'such party's use is reasonably anticipated to interfere with Tenant's operation of its Antenna Facilities. Landlord agrees further that any future lease of the Leased Premises Area will prohibit a user of equal or lower priority from interfering with Tenant's Antenna Facilities, Landlord agrees that it will require any subsequent occupants of the Leased Premises Area of equal or lower priority to Tenant to provide Tenant these same assurances against interference. Landlord shall have the obligation to eliminate any interference with the operations of Tenant caused by such subsequent occupants. If such interference is not eliminated, Tenant shall have, as its sole remedy, the right to terminate this Lease or seek injunctive relief against the interfering occupant, at Tenant's expense., 17. Assignment. This Lease shall run with the property and shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties, their respective successors, personal representatives and assigns. Neither party shall assign its rights or delegate its duties under this Lease without the prior written consent of the other party, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Tenant may assign this Lease, or sublet the Leased Premises, without Landlord's consent, (i) to any parent, subsidiary, or affiliate entity, (ii) to any successor in interest of all or substantially all of the assets, stock or business of Tenant to which this Lease pertains, or (iii) to any other entity to which Tenant transfers ownership of, and/or management responsibility for, a majority of its antenna support towers in the market in which the facility is located, which assignment or transfer shall fully release Tenant from any further obligations or liability under the terms of this Lease commencing on the effective date of the assignment or transfer. A person, association, partnership, corporation or joint -stock company, trust, or other business entity, however, organized, is an affiliate of the person or entity which directly or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with, such person. Control shall be defined as (i) ownership of 20% or more of the voting power of all classes of voting stock of (ii) ownership of 20% or more of the beneficial interests in income and capital of an entity other than a corporation. -14- 18. Condemnation. In the event the whole of the Leased Premises is taken by eminent domain, this Lease shall terminate as of the date title to the Leased Premises vests in the condemning authority. In event a portion of the Leased Premises is taken by eminent domain, either party shall have the right to terminate this Lease as of said date of title transfer, by giving thirty (30) days' written notice to the other party. In the event of any taking under the power of eminent domain, Tenant shall not be entitled to any portion of the award paid for the taking and the Landlord shall receive full amount of such award. Tenant hereby expressly waives any right or claim to any portion thereof. Although all damages, whether awarded as compensation for diminution in value of the leasehold or to the fee of the Leased Premises, shall belong to Landlord, Tenant shall have the right to claim and recover from the condemning authority, but not from Landlord, such compensation as may be separately awarded or recoverable by Tenant on account of any and all damage to Tenant's business and any costs or expenses incurred by Tenant in moving or removing its equipment, personal property, Antenna Facilities, and leasehold improvements from the Leased Premises. 19. Disputes. Any claim, controversy or dispute arising out of this Lease not resolved within twenty (20) days following notice of the dispute, shall be submitted first and promptly to mediation, Each party shall bear its own costs of mediation. The mediation shall be conducted through the Mediation Center, 1821 University Avenue, St Paul, MN. The parties hereto shall decide whether mediation shall be binding or non - binding. If the parties cannot reach agreement, mediation shall be non - binding. In the event mediation is unsuccessful, either party may exercise its.legal or equitable remedies and may commence such action prior to the expiration of the applicable statue of limitations. 20. Hold Over. If Tenant remains in possession of the Leased Property after the Initial Term or any Renewal Term without Landlord's consent, in addition to the rights provided under Section 13 of this Lease, Landlord shall be entitled to all remedies available at law or in equity, including the right to elect to treat Tenant as a tenant from month to month, subject to all provisions of this Lease but with Rent at twice the rate of the annual rent most recently charged in accordance with Sections 2 and 4 of this Lease, prorated on a calendar month basis. 21. Enforcement and Attorneys' Fees. In the event that either party to this Lease shall bring a claim in arbitration to enforce any rights hereunder, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover costs and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred as a result of such claim. 22. Notices. All notices hereunder must be in writing and shall be deemed validly given if delivered personally' or if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed as follows (or any other address that the party to be notified may have designated to the sender by like notice): If to Landlord, to: City of Edina 4801 West 501h Street Edina, MN 55424 ATTN: City Manager With copies to: -15- City of Edina ATTN: Public Works Director 5146 Eden Avenue Edina, MN 55436 If to Tenant, to: T- Mobile Central LLC 8550 W. Bryn Mawr Suite 100 Chicago, IL 60631 Attn.: Lease Admin (MN) With copies to: T- Mobile Central LLC 12920 SE 38" St. Bellevue, WA 98006 Attn.: PCS Lease Admin. 23. Authority. Each of the individuals executing this Lease on behalf of the Tenant or the Landlord represents to the other party that such individual is authorized to do so by requisite action otthe party to this Lease. 24. Bindin Effect. This Lease shall run with the Leased Premises. This Lease shall extend to and bind the heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns of the parties hereto. 25. Complete Lease, This Lease constitutes the entire agreement and understanding of the parties and supersedes all offers, negotiations, and other agreements . of any kind with respect to the subject matter hereof. There are no representations or understandings of any kind not set forth herein. Any modification of or amendment to this Lease must be in writing and executed by both parties. 26. Governing Law. This Lease shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. 27. Limitation of Liability. Nothing in the Lease shall be deemed a waiver of any limitation of liability or defenses under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466 or any other provision of law. 28. Severability. If any part, provision, section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phase of this Lease is found be void or invalid, such invalidity shall not affect any of the remaining portions of this Lease, which shall continue in full force and effect. 29. Memorandum. Upon request by either party, the parties agree to promptly execute and deliver a recordable Memorandum of this Lease in a form acceptable to both parties, which may be recorded by the party requesting the Memorandum of Lease. [The balance of this page has been left blank intentionally.] -16- I IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and affixed their respective seals the day and' year first above written. LANDLORD: City of Edina A Minnesota Municipal Corporation By: Its Mayor By: Its City Manager TENANT: T- Mobile Central LLC -17- By:_ Its STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of 2006, by , the , and , the of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of said municipal corporation. Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 72006. Notary Public STATE OF ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of 2006, by , the of T- Mobile Central LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, on behalf of said limited liability company. Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of , 2006. Notary Public -18- EXHIBIT A EXISTING WATER TANK ABOVE EXRSTINO 110' TALL / \ WATER TOWER � \ / \ EXISTING TELOO PEDESTAL \\ +� / EXISTNG OVERHEAD DOOR EXISTING BITUMINOUS ACCESS ROAD -19- EXISTING 12' DIP / WATERMNN T- MOBILE 13'x20' I iASE AREA w /EQUIPMENT PLATFORM & CABINETS EXISTING 21'0 OAK TREE (TO BE REMOVED) EXISTING SPRINT 20'x20' LEASE AREA w/EQUIPMENT PLATFORM EXISTING ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER EXISTING VERIZON 27'x31' LEASE AREA w /EQUIPMENT BUILDING EXHIBIT B E OVERALL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: The real property in Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Outlot E, Parkwood Knolls 20th Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof. -20- 1 r R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/2/2006 8:15:09 Council Check Register, Page - 1 8/1/2006 - 8/3/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 287096 8/3/2006 102043 A LAPOINTE SIGN INC. 15.98 NAME BADGES 00006440 141369 13828 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 15.98 287097 81312006 100612 A.M. LEONARD 158.45 HOSE REEL 00002050 141632 0218006600017 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 158.45 287098 8/3/2006 102403 AAA LAMBERT_ S LANDSCAPE PRODUCT - 44.73 SOD 00001417 141477 26698 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 89.88 DIRT 00001417 141478 26735 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 191.70 SOD 00001417 141479 26101 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 75.50 SOD, DIRT 00001417 141480 26669 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 191.70 SOD 00001417 141481 26089 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 593.51 287099 813/2006 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 77.40 141449 606783 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 67.96 141450 606766 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 87.96 141451 606749 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 24.12 141452 606767 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 13.00 141453 606781 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 82.68 141525 606768 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 123.24 141526 606784 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 476.36 287100 8/3/2006 117037 ADI MEDICAL 180.00 NITRILE GLOVES 00003032 141633 50465 1400.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 180.00 287101 8/3/2006 118497 ADVENTURE CLUB 2.13 PARTIAL REFUND 141244 072406 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 32.87 PARTIAL REFUND 141244 072406 5301.4541 GENERAL ADMISSIONS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 35.00 287102 8/3/2006 102128 AEARO CO. 57.00 SAFETY GLASSES 00005576 141260 03253907 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 57.00 287103 81312006 102626 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES 313.52 READY MIX 00005917 141323 4159547 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 311.51 READY MIX 00005917 141370 4159546 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/2/2006 8:15:09 Council Check Register Page - 2 8/1/2006 - 813/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 986.46 READY MIX 00005917 141482 4159232 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 571.11 READY MIX 00005917 141483 4159862 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 2,182.60 287104 61312006 119786 AIRGAS NORTH CENTRAL 168.60 FORGED EYELETS 00002041 141634 105711884 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 44.46 STEEL RODS 00002041 141635 105703209 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 213.06 287105 8/312006 105262 ALEX AIR APPARATUS INC. 86.74 CYLINDER REPAIRS 141703 11008 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 86.74 287106 8/3 /2006 103357 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO INC. 841.35 APC SMART UPS 141704 INV66448 2210.6711 NEW EQUIPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 841.35 287107 813/2006 114341 AMAZON CREDIT PLAN 56.94 PHILIPS DVP642 DIVX -CER 141371 693091193243757 5125.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT MEDIA STUDIO 56.94 287108 8/312006 101506 AMERICAN HOTEL REGISTER CO. 96.94 WEATHER RADIOS 00002204 141636 6230689 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 102.70 CLOCKS, CURTAIN HOOKS 00002204 141637 6249173 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 199.64 287109 8/3/2006 100630 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC. 949.86 COPIER PAPER 141484 10066160 -00 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 949.86 287110 8/3/2006 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 424.04 FOOD 141324 605133 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 424.04 287111 8/312006 101276 APRES 10.12 LINEN RENTAL 141261 106182 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 10.12 287112 8/3/2006 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING 15.79 COUPLINGS 00005286 141705 14124 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 15.79 t R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF tOINA Council Check Register, 8/1/2006 - 8/3/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 287113 8/312006 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. 576.38 POOL CHEMICALS 00002213 141638 29073 5620.6545 CHEMICALS 8/212006 8:15:09 Page - . 3 - Business Unit EDINBOROUGH PARK 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 5400.2072 MEN'S CLUB 576.36 5630.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES 287114 813/2006 GENERAL MAINTENANCE 102134 ASHWORTH INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW REVOLVING 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 233.45 MERCHANDISE 00006188 141372 765491 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 233.45 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 287115 8/312006 101954 AUGIE'S INC. 51.42 FOOD 141373 7424 51.42 287116 8/3/2006 100638 BACHMAN'S 192.15 PLANTS 141368 062006 505.78 PLANTS 141368 062006 605.32 PLANTS 141368 062006 1,089.58 PLANTS 141368 062006 2,392.83 287117 813/2006 100642 BANNERS TO GO 226.31 PARK SIGNS 00001848 141485 22152 226.31 287118 8/312006 102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC. 577.84 BATTERIES 00071906 141486 C1167 577.84 287119 8/3/2006 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 96.74 141454 41812000 372.88 141455 37757100 1,601.90 141456 37757700 120.54 141457 41812200 126.75 141458 41812100 479.14 141459 37757600 329.60 141460 37757200 186.60 141729 41841200 3,314.15 287120 8/312006 103486 BEND IN THE RIVER BIG BAND 125.00 PERFORMANCE 8/9/06 141250 072506 125.00 8/212006 8:15:09 Page - . 3 - Business Unit EDINBOROUGH PARK 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 5400.2072 MEN'S CLUB GOLF BALANCE SHEET 5630.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW REVOLVING 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC Council Check Register 533.58 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003641 141325 50324851 8/1/2006- - 8/3/2006 FIRST AID SUPPLIES Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 287121 813/2006 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 8.76 PENCILS 141262 WO- 412799 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 305.99 10.99 FOLDERS, SIGN PAD 141263 WO- 412965 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 305.99 32.86 FILE POUCHES 141264 WO- 413038 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 125.18 OFFICE SUPPLIES 141265 WO- 412430 -1 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 12.68 10.97 FRAMES 00005294 141266 OE- 63127 -1 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 27.00 10.97- RETURN 00005294 141267 CP- WO- 412124 -1 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 29.19 67.27 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00005305 141487 WO- 413082 -1 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 35.00 227.73 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003033 141639 WO- 413133 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 36.94 70.94 SOT SUPPLIES 00003642 141706 OE- 64299 -1 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 39.00 543.73 141640 072706 5410.6235 POSTAGE 287122 81312006 100711 BLOOD, DAVID - 287123 813/2006 287124 6/3/2006 287125 8/312006 287126 8/312006 287127 8/312006 1 r f 8/2/2006 8:15:09 Page - 4 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 141253 080306 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 533.58 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003641 141325 50324851 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 198.36 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003641 141326 50324849 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 731.94 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 305.99 ALIGNMENT 00005044 141327 286318 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 305.99 100663 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 12.68 PETTY CASH 141640 072706 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 27.00 PETTY CASH 141640 072706 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS 29.19 PETTY CASH 141640 072706 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 35.00 PETTY CASH 141640 072706 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 36.94 PETTY CASH 141640 072706 5422.6275 COURSE BEAUTIFICATION 39.00 PETTY CASH 141640 072706 5410.6235 POSTAGE 179.81 - 117062 BRANDT, HELEN 75.27 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 98297 100804 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 75.27 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GOLF REVENUES GOLF ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GOLF ADMINISTRATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,348.80 CONCRETE TESTING 141374 265111 05427.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION PLANT #3 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYST 1,348.80 T r , R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY O, __iNA 8/2,_o 8:15:09 Council Check Register Page - 5 8/1/2006- - 8/3/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description _ Business Unit 287128 8/3/2006 104470 BRIDGESTONE GOLF INC. 230.76 GOLF BALLS 00006104 141375 1001364828 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 230.76 287129 81312006 100667 BROCK WHITE COMPANY 836.03 FORM RELEASE 00005135 141488 11533119 -00 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 836.03 287130 8/3/2006 102398 BUDGET PROJECTOR REPAIR 60.00 REPLACE BELT 00009187 141430 2853 5125.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MEDIA STUDIO 50.00 REPLACE TAKE -UP SPRING 00009194 141431 2855 5125.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MEDIA STUDIO 110.00 287131 8/3/2006 120035 BURNSTINE'S DISTRIBUTING CORP. 401.59 POWER CONVERTER 00001568 141376 80121 5914.6530 REPAIR PARTS TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 401.59 287132 8/3/2006 104185 BUSINESS & LEGAL REPORTS INC. 251.76 PAMPHLETS 00003034 141641 1- 5907363 1400.6405 BOOKS & PAMPHLETS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 251.76 287133 8/3/2006 100776 BUTLER, GEORGE 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 141252 080306 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 287134 8/3/2006 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 130.95 141377 110706 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 1,808.95 141527 101170 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 4,702.95 141528 101175 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 78.80 141529 101176 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 20.75- 141642 101149 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 6,700.90 287135 813/2006 118683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 1,685.00 141530 44966 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,685.00 287136 8/312006 100681 CATCO 528.33 SLACK ADJUSTERS 00001735 141378 3 -07982 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 490.92 BRAKE CHAMBER, CARTRIDGE 00001537 141379 3 -07381 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,019.25 R55CKREG LOG20000 154.90 CITY OF EDINA 317164 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING Council Check Register 8/1/2006 -- 813/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 287137 81312006 141645 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 22.61 16.35 5596524 -8 141329 071906 5430.6186 HEAT 287142 8/3/2006 38.04 5584304 -9 141380 JUL19 7411.6186 HEAT 10.33 5584310 -6 141381 07/19 7411.6186 HEAT ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 1,487.59 5591458-4 141643 072406 1551.6186 HEAT 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 1,552.31 80.68 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 141268 287138 8/3/2006 ADVERTISING OTHER 105038 CENTRAL MN TREE SERVICE LLC 242.00 958.50 TREE REMOVAL 00001999 141328 072006 4088.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP. 958.50 287139 8/3/2006 00003644 141330 102324 CHIEF 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 813.35 399.99 ANTICEPTIC CLEANER 141644 453178 1400.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 287144 81312006 399.99 120044 CLAUDE'S CERAMIC TILE INC. 287140 8/3/2006 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO INSTALL LOCKER ROOM TILE 00002180 141646 072506 5600.1720 8/212006 8:15:09 Page - 6 - Business Unit RICHARDS GOLF COURSE PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY CITY HALL GENERAL TREE REMOVAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 154.90 141531 317164 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 154.90 287141 81312006 100256 CINGULAR WIRELESS 22.61 141645 071706 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 22.61 287142 8/3/2006 103040 CITY PAGES 80.66 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 141268 1100162029 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 80.66 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 141268 1100162029 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 80.68 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 141268 1100162029 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 242.00 287143 8/3/2006 100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP. 813.35 SCBA PARTS 00003644 141330 102374 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 813.35 287144 81312006 120044 CLAUDE'S CERAMIC TILE INC. 11,800.00 INSTALL LOCKER ROOM TILE 00002180 141646 072506 5600.1720 BUILDINGS EB /CL BALANCE SHEET 655.00 TILE BENCH & LEDGES 00002238 141647 7/25 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 12,455.00 287145 813/2006 120050 COMCAST IP SERVICES i 25.00 LEGAL REQUEST 141648 8136 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 25.00 i 1 ,. r 141532 371720 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 551.70 R55CKREG LOG20000 141533 371719 CITY O�- __.AA COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,284.15 141730 371718 Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,393.89 8/1/2006 -- 8/3/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 287146 8/312006 220341 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 86.19 BAKERY 141382 261.81 SAFETY GLASSES, GLOVES 00005112 141269 02858775 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 141383 220462 36.97 SAFETY TAPE 00005278 141489 02863331 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 220489 5421.5510 391.14 GLOVES, EARPLUGS 00005274 141490 02863216 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 73.09 DRINK MIX 00005283 141491 02863617 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 763.01 287147 8/3/2006 101329 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC. 85.06 REBAR, BACKER ROD 00005117 141270 M080075 1314.6406 iGENERAL SUPPLIES 85.06 287148 8/3/2006 120032 CORPORATE MECHANICAL 8,980.00 INSTALL HVAC ROOF UNITS 00005710 141331 105192 5100.1720 BUILDINGS 6,530.00 REPAIRS, ADD ROOF DRAINS 00001108 141332 105827 5100.1720 BUILDINGS 15,510.00 287149 813/2006 100370 CRAGUN'S 303.54 MAAO FALL CONFERENCE 141333 072606 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 303.54 287150 8/312006 100700 CURTIS 1000 1,587.55 ENVELOPES 00004118 141271 1460576 5910.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,587.55 287151 8/3/2006 100701 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. 289.13 CLUTCH PLATE & SLEEVE 00001738 141272 135830 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 319.50 BROOM ASSEMBLY 00001836 141492 135804 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 146.08 CLUTCH MOUNTING PLATE 00001738 141493 135835 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 56.35 TIRE AND TUBE 00002039 141649 135686 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 811.06 287152 8/312006 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING 8/212uu6 8:15:09 Page - 7 - GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE STREET RENOVATION ART CENTER BALANCE SHEET ART CENTER BALANCE SHEET ASSESSING GENERAL (BILLING) EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTENNIAL LAKES 2,558.04 141532 371720 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 551.70 141533 371719 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,284.15 141730 371718 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,393.89 287153 8/312006 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 61.12 BAKERY 141334 220341 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 86.19 BAKERY 141382 220342 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 52.23 BAKERY 141383 220462 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 37.18 BAKERY 141384 220489 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 141534 445145 5842.5513 Council Check Register YORK SELLING 8/1/2006- -- 8/3/2006 141535 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 33.58 BAKERY 141650 220577 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 270.30 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 287154 813/2006 101747 DRESSER TRAP ROCK INC. 2,234.25 27,607.14 FA -2 00005919 141494 59616 1314.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK 27,607.14 8/312006 119716 EASTERN PACIFIC APPAREL INC. 287155 8/3/2006 100739 EAGLE WINE 812/2006 8:15:09 Page- 8 Business Unit GRILL STREET RENOVATION 982.49 141534 445145 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 876.30 141535 445138 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 375.46 141536 445142 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,234.25 287156 8/312006 119716 EASTERN PACIFIC APPAREL INC. 1,011.79 MERCHANDISE 00006477 141651 344323 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,011.79 287157 81312006 106496 ED'S TROPHIES INC. 78.42 PLAQUES 141273 70809 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 78.42 287158 81312006 105467 EDINA CRIME PREVENTION FUND 4,770.00 CREDIT CARD RECEIPTS 141707 072806 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 4,770.00 287159 81312006 116448 EGAN OIL COMPANY 22,793.21 GASOLINE 00005895 141274 118111 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 22,793.21 287160 81312006 101956 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANC 291.50 E-82 PUMP TEST 141708 26525 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 325.00 T -90 PUMP TEST 141709 26527 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 265.00 E-81 PUMP TEST 141710 26524 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 249.75 T -90 REPAIRS 141711 26548 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,131.25 287161 8/312006 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC 1,426.05 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003635 141335 853394 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,426.05 287162 8/3/2006 105339 ENRGI 112.50 WEBSITE GRAPHICS 141275 4589 1210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS r R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 287163 81312006 287164 8/3/2008 287165 813/2006 287166 81312006 287167 8/3/2006 287168 813/2006 8 /i- 8:15:09 Page - 9 Business Unit COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PSTF OCCUPANCY ENGINEERING GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 330.00 SPEECH TRANSLITERATOR 141712 072806 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 330.00 CITY O, AA 287169 81312006 119936 GLOBAL OAK Council Check Register 8/1/2006 - - 8/3/2006 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5,875.00 WEBSITE REDESIGN 141276 4612 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT 56.25 WEBSITE GRAPHICS 141277 4618 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT 6,043.75 101103 GRAINGER 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY CABLE REEL 00005103 141280 217.63 A/C COMPRESSOR 00005158 141278 6- 847114 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 217.63 9145650397 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 177.82 FILTERS 00005131 120038 FELGEN, ROBERT 9145067758 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 309.45 53.94 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 141385 072606 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 53.94 116189 FILTRATION SYSTEMS INC. AUTO 782.13 AIR FILTERS 141386 13478 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 782.13 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 106351 FOSTER, REBECCA 123.32 MEETING SUPPLIES 141652 072706 1260.6106 MEETING EXPENSE 123.32 100760 FOWLER ELECTRIC 29.72 ROPE 00001709 141279 62822800 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 29.72 119845 FRANTZ, LUANNE 8 /i- 8:15:09 Page - 9 Business Unit COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PSTF OCCUPANCY ENGINEERING GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 330.00 SPEECH TRANSLITERATOR 141712 072806 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 330.00 287169 81312006 119936 GLOBAL OAK 356.25 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 141387 327 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT 881.25 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 141388 329 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT 1,237.50 287170 8/3/2006 101103 GRAINGER 573.18 CABLE REEL 00005103 141280 9140841256 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 167.51 BATTERIES, DOLLY 00005132 141281 9145650397 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 177.82 FILTERS 00005131 141389 9145067758 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 309.45 SHELVING 00005279 141495 9147680723 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,227.96 287171 81312006 102613 GRANDVIEW TIRE & AUTO 48.00 THRUST ANGLE ALIGNMENT 00001723 141282 358117 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING WATER TREATMENT DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register, 8/1/2006 - 8/312006 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 48.00 THRUST ANGLE ALIGNMENT 00005291 141283 357186 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 96.00 287172 8/3/2006 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 8/212006 8:15:09 Page - 10 - Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 421.25 141537 83569 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING " 552.50 141538 83568 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 221.50 141539 83567 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,195.25 287173 813/2006 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 201.98 T -T DESK WNOL CONTROL 00005150 141653 919027196 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 91.70 BULBS 00002045 141654 918927657 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 293.68 287174 8/3/2006 100785 GREUPNER, JOE 7,654.00 GOLF LESSONS 141655 072606 5410.6132 PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION 7,654.00 287175 8/3/2006 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 5,849.10 141540 445149 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING .90 141541 444956 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING .90 141542 444959 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 178.76 141543 445148 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 304.45 141544 441918 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,446.10 141545 445075 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING . 2,449.82 141546 445141 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 33.92 141547 445140 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,826.11 141548 445144 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 256.79- 141549 698436 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 20.94- 141550 698435 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 256.74- 141551 698434 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 13,555.59 287176 8/312006 114514 H & R CONST. CO. 2,302.50 F & I PLATE BEAM GUARDRAIL 00005107 141713 10758 1343.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BRIDGES GUARD RAILS 2,302.50 287177 8/3/2006 102060 HALLOCK COMPANY INC 88.12 WALK -INS 00001963 141336 16835 -1 1648.6530 REPAIR PARTS SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 88.12 287178 8/3120' 100795 HARRIS HOMEYER CO. r � R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY . _,JINA Council Check Register 8/1/2006 — 8/3/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 109,294.00 INSURANCE PREMIUM 141656 76546 1550.6200 INSURANCE b,. .6 8:15:09 Page - 11 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 109,294.00 WATER TREATMENT WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT COST OF GOODS SOLD 287179 8/312006 100797 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT 874.91 CHLORINE, CAUSTIC SODA 141432 829094 5311.6545 3,490.17 CHEMICALS 00005913 141496 826896 5915.6586 2,326.06 CHEMICALS 00005913 141497 829091 5915.6586 6,691.14 287180 8/312006 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 205.44 MEAT PATTIES 141337 019383 5421.5510 205.44 287181 8/312006 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION 185.50 RADIO ADMIN FEE 00005289 141284 26068078 1553.6237 1,779.54 RADIO ADMIN FEE 141338 26068013 1470.6151 1,965.04 287182 81312006 101215 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFI 1,019.51 BOOKING FEES - JUNE 2006 141657 1138 1195.6170 1,019.51 287183 8/3/2006 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 924.13 JUNE 2006 141658 001497 1195.6225 924.13 287184 8/3/2006 106371 HENNEPIN FACULTY ASSOCIATES 2,265.17 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES 141259 080306 1470.6103 2,265.17 287185 8/3/2006 118765 HENRY SCHEIN INC. 319.82 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003639 141339 6240682 -01 1470.6510 319.82 287186 81312006 116640 HERITAGE CROSS APPAREL 402.38 MERCHANDISE 00006100 141390 25590 5440.5511 402.38 287187 813/2006 100805 HIRSHFIELD'S 136.23 PAINT 00005109 141285 032198396 1343.6406 136.23 b,. .6 8:15:09 Page - 11 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL RADIO SERVICE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COURT CHARGES LEGAL SERVICES BOARD & ROOM PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES GENERAL SUPPLIES BRIDGES GUARD RAILS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY. OF EDINA Council Check Register, 8/1/2006 - 813/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 287188 8/3/2006 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURI 500.55 FIELD MARKING PAINT 00005874 141340 72318 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER 500.55, 287189 8/3/2006 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 812/2006 8:15:09 Page - 12 Business Unit FIELD MAINTENANCE 758.22 141552 394777 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,245.25 141731 394167 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING I.= - 141732 394778 141733 394779 5862.5514 5822.5514 287190 8/312006 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 117853 HOLIDAY INN COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 164.98 LODGING 141659 62455 1400.6104 164.98 287191 8/3/2006 102114 HUEBSCH 25.02 RUG CLEANING 141660 663301 5620.6230 25.02 287192 8/3/2006 112628 ICEE COMPANY, THE 1,407.05 CONCESSION PRODUCT 141286 111397 5320.5510 1,407.05 287193 8/3/2006 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 10.63 PVC ELBOW, NIPPLES 00001980 141341 443097 1642.6530 10.63 287194 813/2006 101400 JAMES, WILLIAM F 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 141257 080306 1419.6102 100.00 287195 81312006 102146 JESSEN PRESS 6,285.00 WATER REPORT PRINT & MAIL 141342 54527 5913.6103 9,069.31 ABOUT TOWN PRINTING & MAILING 141342 54527 2210.6123 15,354.31 287196 81312006 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 6,121.05 141553 1007633 5842.5514 52.50 141554 1007634 5842.5515 53.85 141555 678182 5842.5514 164.55 141556 1018404 5421.5514 52.50 141557 1007627 5822.5515 i COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING LOST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS REPAIR PARTS FIELD MAINTENANCE CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION MAGAZINEINEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY c AA 8/. 8:15:09 Council Check Register Page - 13 8/1/2006 -- 8/3/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subtedger Account Description Business Unit 745.35 141558 1007626 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 4,720.25 141734 1007625 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 11,910.05 287198 81312006 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. - 372.65 141461 1110078 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,526.19 141559 1112941 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,593.54 141560 1112945 5842:5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 24.11 141561 1112939 5842.5514 ;COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,137.63 141562 1112940 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 294.25 141563 1112942 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,087.64 141564 1112948 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 34.02 141565 1112949 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,844.96 141566 1112943 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 749.21 141567 1112951 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,330.50 141568 1112955 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 931.36 141569 1112950 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,782.06 141570 1112953 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 7,882.09 141571 1112956 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 379.69 141572 1112936 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 161.09 141573 1112934 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 89.53 141574 1112933 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 30.60- 141575 316854 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 7.50- 141576 316855 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 23.67- 141577 316503 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 7.69- 141578 316506 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 36.00- 141579 316505 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 29.20- 141580 316502 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 8.67- 141581 316501 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4.82- 141582 316500 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 23.84- 141583 316499 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 658.47 141735 1112935 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,416.37 141736 1112937 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,013.09 141737 1112938 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 29,136.46 287199 6/3/2006 103230 JOHNSTONS SALES & SERVICE 140.26 VACUUM BAGS 00006339 141661 030056 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 140.26 287200 8/3/2006 104297 K. BELL 78.00 MERCHANDISE 00006201 141662 0569598 -IN 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 287201 8/312006 287202 81312006 287203 8/312006 287204 81312006 287205 81312006 287206 81312006 267207 81312006 287208 813/2006 287209 813120' CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/1/2006 - 8/3/2006 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 78.00 106186 KAEDING & ASSOCIATES INC. Business Unit 812/2006 8:15:09 Page - 14 234.00 INSPECTION FEES 00005320 141663 050722C 10035.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION LS35 LIFT STATION #3 REHAB 234.00 103449 KAMPA, TINA 34.45 PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES 141714 072806 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 279.46 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 141714 072806 1624.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLAYGROUND & THEATER 313.91 111018 KEEPRS INC. 320.85 UNIFORMS 00003612 141343 54297 -01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 73.90 UNIFORMS 00003637 141344 55417 -01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 261.58 UNIFORMS 00003612 141345 54252 -02 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 536.75 UNIFORMS 00003612 141346 54424 -01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 169.95 UNIFORMS 00003637 141347 55417 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 423.44 BADGES 00003616 141715 54408 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,786.47 119768 KEOMED INC. 1,061.41 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003640 141348 IVC10542 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,061.41 105887 KOESSLER, JOE 153.00 JULY 2006 SERVICE 141498 070106 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 153.00 102474 KRULL, JULIE 55.98 UNIFORM PURCHASE 141664 072706 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 55.98 118334 KULLY SUPPLY INC. 494.87 REPAIRS FROM WATER BREAK 00005322 141499 0012583 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 494.87 118660 LAKES AREA HOME IMPROVEMENT SE 221.00 WATER DAMAGE REPAIRS 00005324 141500 1268 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 221.00 WATER DAMAGE REPAIRS 00005323 141501 1269 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 442.00 100605 LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS ' ,JA R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY L Council Check Register 8/1/2006- -- 8/3/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 106.75 LOGO SHIRTS 00004120 141287 04902093 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 37.60 LOGO CLOTHING 00004102 141502 04844580 1513.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE SENIOR TRIPS 8/� 8:15:09 Page- 15 Business Unit COMMUNICATIONS EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS SENIOR CITIZENS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES 144.35 CENTENNIAL LAKES TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES 287210 81312006 120042 LARSON, PHYLLIS 110.00 TRIP.REFUND 141503 072706 1628.4392.07 110.00 287211 81312006 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 25.00 CONFERENCE-REGISTRATION 00005308 141716 1- 000026764 1281.6104 25.00 287212 8/3/2006 120033 LENCO 53.27 STRIKER PINS 00005624 141349 8214 1553.6530 53.27 287213 81312006 116575 LIFE LINE INC. 100.00 MEDICAL OVERSIGHT PROGRAM 00005352 141717 LL -1514 1552.6406 100.00 287214 8/3/2006 105596 LINCOLN EQUIPMENT INC. 389.45 FLEXI -DECK 00002214 141665 S150698 5620.6406 389.45 287215 813/2006 106301 LOFFLER COMPANIES INC. 63.10 COPIER USAGE 00001512 141288 159162 1552.6406 63.10 287216 8/3/2006 100861 LYNDALE GARDEN & HARDWARE, 101.98 FLOWERS 00002005 141666 976043 5630.6620 204.22 FLOWERS 00002009 141667 976600 5630.6620 29.50 FLOWERS 00002013 141668 981321 5630.6620 90.71 PLANTS 00002029 141669 991469 5630.6620 426.41 287217 8/3/2006 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 777.36 CANDY 141433 204847 5320.5510 1,691.48 141462 204606 5842.5515 2,468.84 287218 8/3/2006 101165 MAA.O. 250.00 FALL CONFERENCE 141670 0726 1190.6104 SENIOR TRIPS 8/� 8:15:09 Page- 15 Business Unit COMMUNICATIONS EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS SENIOR CITIZENS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 811/2006 - 8/3/2006 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 8/2/2006 8:15:09 Page - 16 - 250.00 287219 8/3/2006 100864 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. 348.11 DIRT SHOE ASSEMBLY 00001740 141289 2064869 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 348.11 - 287220 813/2006 120031 MAPLE GROVE GLASS 254.19 CLEAR LAMI FOR PUMPER TRUCK 00001464 141290 CS0875 15516180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 254.19 _ 287221 8/312006 100868 MARK VII SALES 370.35 141392 972581 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 83.00 141463 974291 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,021.80 141464 974290 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 54.40 141738 973968 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,167.10 141739 973967 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,150.85 141740 974275 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,180.80 141741 976658 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 12,028.30 287222 8/312006 102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC 11,645.00 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 141504 0058027 -IN 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 11,645.00 287223 8/3/2006 101146 MATRIX TELECOM INC. - 149.25 141291 005503918 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 149.25 287224 8/3/2006 100953 MEDTRONIC EMERGENCY RESPONSE S 643.31 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003627 141351 PC905613 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 643.31 287225 8/3/2006 101483 MENARDS 72.55 LUMBER 00005121 141292 45128 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW 8 ICE REMOVAL 193.76 GEL ROCKERS, VISE GRIPS 00005145 141293 45813 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 11.47 PARTS 00001989 141352 45571 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 107.72 LUMBER 00005275 141505 46105 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 142.71 MULCH 00005155 141506 46086 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 77.76 FUNGICIDE, ORTHO MALATHION 00001994 141507 46124 1643.6546 WEED SPRAY GENERAL TURF CARE 97.02 LUMBER, FASTENERS 00002228 141671 46681 5620.6532 PAINT EDINBOROUGH PARK 182.94 LUMBER 00002228 141672 46264 5620.6532 PAINT EDINBOROUGH PARK 885.93 1 1 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY Or AA 8/2,- 8:15:09 Council Check Register Page - 17 8/1/2006 -- 8/3/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 287226 8/3/2008 101987 MENARDS 42.54 HOSE 00002048 141673 10674 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 35.08 OUTLET COVERS 00002230 141674 11557 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 96.33 HOOKS, WIRE, LINERS 00002231 141675 12873 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK - 31.23 SANDPAPER, WIRE NUTS 00002231 141676 11984 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 205.18 287227 81312006 118953 MERCURY OFFICE SUPPLY - 106.15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00009173 141434 186700 -0 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 106.15 287228 81312006 100882 MERIT SUPPLY 520.79 TISSUE, TOWELS 00005079 141294 69906 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 610.94 CLEANERS, TOWELS, CUPS 00001857 141353 69905 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 532.77 CARPET SHAMPOO, CLEANERS 00005114 141508 69927 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 84.12 VACUUM REPAIR 00005123 141509 69925 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 592.99 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00008075 141510 69952 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 228.76 CUPS, VACUUM BAGS 00005125 141718 69956 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 2,570.37 287229 813/2006 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 493.84 FIELD MARKING PAINT 00001992 141511 92981 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 493.84 287230 8/312006 100692 MIDWEST COCA -COLA EAGAN 422.20 141466 68063716 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 346.80 141467 48140010 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 769.00 287231 8/3/2006 101890 MIDWEST VENDING INC 196.89 CANDY 00006338 141393 4678 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 196.89 287232 8/312006 102873 MILLER, SUSAN 181.29 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 141742 073106 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 181.29 287233 8/3/2006 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 1,440.00 WATER & SEWER CUT OFF 00005318 141295 32863 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1,440.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/2/2006 8:15:09 Council Check Register Page - 18 8/1/2006 -- 8/3/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 287234 8/3/2008 120051 MINNESOTA FIRE CHIEF MAGAZINE 24.00 SUBSCRIPTION 141719 208 1470.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 24.00 287235 8/312006. 100066 MINNESOTA MAILING SOLUTIONS 30.36 POSTAGE METER BRUSH 141391 37843 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 47.26 POSTAGE MACHINE INK ROLLERS 141720 37968 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 77.62 287236 8/3/2006 101144 MINNESOTA UC FUND 157.97 2ND QTR UNEMPLOYMENT 141296 EMP 07976541 1550.6046 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 157.97 287237 81312006 100159 MOOERS PRINTING INC. 381.27 BROCHURES 00003636 141354 4511 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 381.27 287238 8/3/2006 108668 MORRIS, GRAYLYN 150.00 PERFORMANCE 8/8/06 141249 072506 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION - 150.00 287239 8/3/2006 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 84.40 CONTROL, MODULE 00001988 141297 536957 -00 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 84.40 287240 81312006 100916 MUZAK -NORTH CENTRAL 207.54 MUSIC SERVICE 141677 A685470 5630.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES 207.54 287241 813/2006 111291 MYHRE, CONNIE 88.00 PROGRAM REFUND 141721 072806 1600.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 88.00 287242 81312006 101108 NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE 230.92 CRAFT SUPPLIES 00009185 141435 0614601XXOE 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 230.92 287243 8/3/2006 100012 NATIONAL WATERWORKS INC. 1,119.42 GATE VALVES 00002000 141394 3705748 5913.6530. REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 1,119.42 287244 j 813/200' 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY 01 .A 8/2_ 8:15:09 Council Check Register Page - 19 - 8/1/2006 - 8/3/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 178.00 141584 38698 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 178.00 287245 8/312006 104672 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 441.52 141678 909583317 -056 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL - 441.52 287246 8/3/2006 111483 NICHOLSON, JEFFREY 150.00 JULY PIANO TUNING 141512 072706 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 287247 813/2006 100724 NISSEN, DICK - 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 141256 080306 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 287248 8/3/2006 115616 NORTH IMAGE APPAREL INC. 119.39 UNIFORM PURCHASE 00005293 141298 NIA2038 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 119.39 287249 8/3/2006 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY 107.28 STROBE TUBES 00001739 141395 10812 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 107.28 287250 8/312008 102652 NORTHLAND CHEMICAL CORP. 274.26 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00001982 141355 102610 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 274.26 287251 81312006 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY 237.26 CHARCOAL, TOOL KITS 00009195 141436 33055800 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 80.16 ARTISTICO W/C 300LB HOT PRESS 00009177 141437 32623401 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 34.07 PAPER, TEMPERA 00009190 141438 33075200 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 179.82 POTTERY TOOL KITS 00009195 141439 33055801 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 531.31 287252 813/2006 100930 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO. 817.92 TIRES 00001947 141396 NW- 102540 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 817.92 287253 8/3/2006 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 10.64 PAPER 141397 345035518 -001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 10.64 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/2/2006 8:15:09 Council Check Register Page - 20 8/1/2006 - 8/312006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 287254 8/312006 102712 OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOG 429.46 141752 W06060548 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 17.98 ARNESON 141753 W06006541 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 35.96 GREENHOUSE 141753 W06006541 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 71.92 141753 W06006541 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 89.90 141753 W06006541 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 90.14 HISTORICAL 141753 W06006541 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 90.53 141753 W06006541 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 107.88 141753 W06006541 1481.6188 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION 108.97 141753 W06006541 5311.6188 TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION 118.46 141753 W06006541 5210.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF DOME PROGRAM 122.62 141753 W06006541 5111.6188 TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 124.40 CARD ACCESS -PARKS 141753 W06006541 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 143.84 141753 W06006541 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 161.92 141753 W06006541 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 550.31 141753 W06006541 5610.6188 TELEPHONE ED ADMINISTRATION 2,264.29 287255 8/312006 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 858.99 UTILITY BOX 00001470 141398 402819 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 58.58 DRILL RENTAL 00001995 141513 403639 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 917.57 287256 8/3/2006 100939 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC. 153.05 COOKIES 141399 7724706 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 153.05 267257 81312006 103624 P & L AUTOMOTIVE INC. 330.00 SPRAY ON BEDLINER 00005045 141299 163956 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 330.00 287258 8/3/2006 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 140.00 141468 8115260 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 28.00 141469 8115262 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 963.95 141585 8115642 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,206.95 141586 8115636 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,310.30 141587 8115644 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING. 210.00 141743 8115640 -IN 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5,859.20 287259 8/3/2006 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 12.00 141356 27850632 121.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL • R55CKREG LOG20000 VERNON SELLING CITY G. NA YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING Council Check Register VERNON SELLING 287260 8/3/2006 8/1/2006- - 8/3/2006 119372 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 958.60 141400 27850674 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 277.70 141679 33314697 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 242.20 141680 33314687 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 196.80 141681 34774034 _ 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 156.00 141682 34774383 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES 8& . 8:15:09 Page - 21 Business Unit GRILL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE CENTENNIAL LAKES VANVALKENBURG VANVALKENBURG EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,843.30 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 287260 8/3/2006 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 119372 PETSMART #463 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 32.99 K -9 SUPPLIES 141683 T -8404 4607.6406 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 32.99 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 287261 813/2006 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 293.62 141465 2352788 5862.5513 632.15 141588 2354985 5842.5513 370.50 141589 2354984 5842.5512 631.03 141590 2352369 5862.5512 775.85 141591 2354986 5862.5513 1,839.37 141592 2354987 5862.5513 47.28 141593 2354988 5862.5515 241.51 141594 2354989 5862.5512 760.09 141595 2354982 5822.5513 915.30 141596 2354981 5822.5513 7.59- 141597 3342565 5842.5513 12.00- 141598 3342566 5842.5513 16.00- 141599 3342445 5842.5513 107.42 141744 2354983 5822.5512 6,578.53 287262 8/3/2006 101223 PLANET FORD 3.46 KEY 00001465 141357 122823WFOW 1553.6530 3.46 287263 8/3/2006 101110 POLLY NORMAN PHOTOGRAPHY 50.00 ABOUT TOWN PHOTOS 141722 072706 2210.6123 50.00 287264 8/3/2006 102728 PRECISION LANDSCAPE AND TREE C 1,970.25 ASSESSED TREE REMOVAL 00005246 141514 5904 4088.6103 1,970.25 287265 8/3/2006 101811 PREMIER FLEET SERVICES 699.90 AUTO REPAIRS 00005047 141300 18901 1553.6180 GENERAL SUPPLIES 8& . 8:15:09 Page - 21 Business Unit GRILL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE CENTENNIAL LAKES VANVALKENBURG VANVALKENBURG EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREE REMOVAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 699.90 287266 8/3/2006 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 17.68 470.09 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/1/2006 -- 8/3/2006 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 141470 442436 141600 445143 141601 445139 141602 445146 287267 8/312006 VERNON SELLING 103094 PROTECTION ONE 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 25.00 ALARM PAD REPAIR 00008079 141515 071106 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 25.00 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 287268 813/2006 VERNON SELLING 104669 PURE BLUE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 482.00 MERCHANDISE 141684 73717 482.00 287269 8/312006 100971 QUALITY WINE 227.69 141471 730747 -00 .06 141603 736989 -00 455.39 141604 736988 -00 1,818.93 141605 737050 -00 1,266.55 141606 737102 -00 129.34 141607 737103 -00 254.60 141608 736944 -00 230.30 141609 736392 -00 1,156.30 141610 736932 -00 538.70 141611 737120 -00 121.15 141612 737107 -00 1,639.32 141613 737051 -00 386.30 141614 727890 -00 803.40 141615 737052 -00 932.73 141616 737121 -00 234.45 141617 736933 -00 7.32- 141618 734590 -00 10,187.89 287270 813/2006 101965 QWEST 112.06 952 920 -8166 141516 8166 -7/06 112.06 287271 813/20' 100972 R&R SPECIALTIES INC 812/2006 8:15:09 Page - 22 - Business Unit 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5511.6250 ALARM SERVICE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 5310.5510 5822.5512 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5513 5842.5514 5842.5513 5842.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5512 5862.5513 5822.5512 5822.5513 5822.5513 5842.5512 1550.6188 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK -SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CRY. L' -NA Council Check Register 8/1/2006 -- 8/3/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 3,979.32 ZAMBONI REPAIR 00008078 141517 26001 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 3,979.32 287272 8/3/2006 120036 RAMAKER & ASSOCIATES INC. 23,550.00 FLOW RIDER DESIGN SERVICES 141401 9536 -1 5300.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 23,550.00 287273 81312006 101109 RDO EQUIPMENT CO. - 26.11 OIL FILTERS, SEALS 00005156 141358 P09033 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 26.11 287274 8/3/2008 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 218.75 FOUNTAIN REPAIRS 00002055 141685 43357 5630.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 491.70 REBUILD BACKFLOW PREVENTOR 00002055 141686 43287 5630.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 710.45 287275 8/3/2006 118658 RIGHTWAY GLASS INC. 30.00 ATTACH REARVIEW MIRROR 00005042 141301 39837 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 30.00 287276 8/3/2006 101979 ROFIDAL, KEVIN 20.00 K -9 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 141687 072706 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 41.43 K -9 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 141687 072706 1400.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 49.73 K -9 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 141687 072706 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 111.16 287277 8/3/2006 120041 ROMINE, JUDY 38.00 TRIP REFUND 141518 072706 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS 38.00 287278 8/3/2006 113372 RONNING, TED 8/- . 8:15:09 Page - 23 Business Unit ARENA ICE MAINT AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTENNIAL LAKES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SENIOR CITIZENS 150.00 PERFORMANCE 8!7 106 141247 072506 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 287279 8/3/2006 100982 ROTO- ROOTER 300.00 CLEAR FLOOR DRAINS 141686 04811270821 5620.6160 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 300.00 287280 8/3/2006 100987 SA-AG INC 172.47 FILL SAND 00005111 141519 50197 5913.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK DISTRIBUTION 172.47 R55CKREG LOG20000 125.00 PERFORMANCE 8110106 CITY OF EDINA 072506 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION Council Check Register 8/1/2006- -- 8/3/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 287281 81312006 141690 101634 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPANY 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 50.65 90.83 BAKERY 00006349 141689 159931 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 90.83 74.86 K -9 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 141690 072606 1400.6107 287282 81312006 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 155.51 316.88 101 - 21373069350 141302 TELEVISION 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 46.20 101 - 26373069350 141303 FOOD 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 141305 071906 112.11 37306935 CHEMICALS 141723 002548 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 27.18 37306935 CANDY 141724 004588 1623.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 103249 SHANNON, JIM 502.37 287283 813/2006 PERFORMANCE 8/8/06 104788 SANDY'S PROMOTIONAL STUFF 072506 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 669.89 PROMOTIONAL ITEMS 141304 SH6078 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 287288 669.89 103249 SHANNON, JIM 287284 8/312006 104239 SEAGER, KRISTI 125.00 JULY STROLLING PIANO 141520 072706 8/212006 8:15:09 Page - 24 Business Unit GRILL CENT SVC PW BUILDING VANVALKENBURG BUILDING MAINTENANCE TENNIS INSTRUCTION COMMUNICATIONS 125.00 PERFORMANCE 8110106 141251 072506 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 125.00 287285 8/3/2006 103970 SEEGER, MICHAEL 30.00 K -9 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 141690 072606 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 50.65 K -9 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 141690 072606 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 74.86 K -9 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 141690 072606 1400.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 155.51 287286 8/312006 101587 SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES 1,568.00 DIAL -A -RIDE JUNE 2006 141305 071906 1514.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DIAL -A -RIDE PROGRAM 1,568.00 287287 813/2006 103249 SHANNON, JIM 125.00 PERFORMANCE 8/8/06 141248 072506 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 125.00 287288 8/3/2006 103249 SHANNON, JIM 125.00 JULY STROLLING PIANO 141520 072706 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 125.00 287289 8/3/2006 118211 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 169.09 PAINT 00005098 141306 7877-0 1343.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BRIDGES GUARD RAILS 169.09 287290 8/3120' 101000 SIR SPEEDY R55CKREG _�G20000 CITY ( AA Council Check Register 8/1/2006_ - 8/3/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 335.53 BUSINESS CARD SHELLS 141307 51300 1550.6406 . GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/. 8:15:09 Page - 25 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL DISTRIBUTION COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GRILL DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 335.53 BUILDING MAINTENANCE REPAIR PARTS ART CENTER POTTERY REPAIR PARTS ART CENTER POTTERY 287291 8/3/2006 120030 SMABY, LINDA 401.66 PLUMBING REPAIRS 141308 071906 5913.6180 401.66 287292 8/312006 106403 SOUND CLIPS INC. 55.00 SOUND CLIP 141309 33355 2210.6406 55.00 287293 8/312006 102935 SOUTH TOWN REFRIGERATION INC 418.24 ICE MAKER REPAIR 00006340 141691 54609 5421.6230 418.24 287294 81312006 116856 SPRINT 813.50 141692 7/15 1400.6160 813.50 287295 8/312006 101004 SPS COMPANIES 195.68 PIPE 00001985 141359 S1479167.001 1646.6406 247.81 WATER HEATER 00001986 141360 S1480608.001 1646.6406 78.75 ELBOWS, COUPLINGS, PLUGS 00005083 141441 S1476904.001 5112.6530 7.69 WALL PLATES 00005102 141442 S1478251.001 5112.6530 529.93 287296 8/3/2006 102193 STAN BANN BIG BAND 100.00 PERFORMANCE 8/6106 141246 072506 5610.6136 100.00 287297 8/3/2008 101015 STREICHERS 34.95 GLOVES 141693 1367487 1400.6203 21.25 HOLSTER 141694 1367060 1400.6203 127.75 TACTICAL WEAPON LIGHT 141695 1345337 1400.6203 228.64 DOME COVERS 00003646 141725 1366745 1470.6530 412.59 287298 8/312006 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 388.00 FENDER REPAIRS 00005048 141310 CVCB505059 1553.6530 388.00 287299 8/3/2006 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/. 8:15:09 Page - 25 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL DISTRIBUTION COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GRILL DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE REPAIR PARTS ART CENTER POTTERY REPAIR PARTS ART CENTER POTTERY PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION UNIFORM ALLOWANCE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/1/2006 - 8/3/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 219.37 TIRES 00005157 141402 10056024 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1419.6102 5311.6406 5311.6511 5320.5510 5430.6406 4077.6406 1553.6585 5421.5514 5421.5514 5421.5514 5862.5514 962.5515 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES ACCESSORIES 8/212006 8:15:09 Page - 26 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION DISTRIBUTION RESERVE PROGRAM POOL OPERATION POOL OPERATION POOL CONCESSIONS RICHARDS GOLF COURSE EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 219.37 GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 287300 8/3/2006 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 314.60 PUBLISH FINANCIAL STMTS 141443 878882 157.30 PUBLISH FINANCIAL STMTS 141444 878883 171.60 PUBLISH FINANCIAL STMTS 141445 878884 75.08 PUBLISH AD FOR BID 141446 878885 718.58 287301 8/3/2006 110674 SUPERIOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIO 56.30 PHONE REPAIR 00005292 141311 14704 56.30 287302 8/3/2006 100794 SWANSON, HAROLD 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 141255 080306 100.00 287303 813/2006 119864 SYSCO MINNESOTA 167.80 PAPER SUPPLIES 141447 607251759 284.55 CAN LINERS 141447 607251759 460.73 FOOD 141447 607251759 913.08 287304 8/3/2006 101027 TARGET 17.01 9- 555-029 -840 SUPPLIES 141403 071806 17.01 287305 8/3/2006 100169 TEJAS 60.00 GIFT CARD - SOFTBALL LEAGUE 141726 072806 60.00 287306 813/2006 101326 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO 336.89 LAMPS, ROCKER SWITCHES 00001542 141404 32642 -00 336.89 287307 8/3/2006 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 787.55 141361 417876 146.00 141362 23405 450.00 141405 23447 3,508.50 141745 418085 34.00 141746 418295 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1419.6102 5311.6406 5311.6511 5320.5510 5430.6406 4077.6406 1553.6585 5421.5514 5421.5514 5421.5514 5862.5514 962.5515 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES ACCESSORIES 8/212006 8:15:09 Page - 26 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION DISTRIBUTION RESERVE PROGRAM POOL OPERATION POOL OPERATION POOL CONCESSIONS RICHARDS GOLF COURSE EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 8& 8:15:09 Page - 27 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION CENT SVC PW BUILDING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL STORM SEWER GENERAL MAINTENANCE CITY HALL GENERAL 740.00 HUMIDIFER MAINTENANCE 141407 22434 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES R55CKREG LuG20000 740.00 CITY O. AA 287313 8/312006 Council Check Register 103248 ULLRICH, CINDY 8/1/2006- — 8/3/2006 100.00 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 100.00 4,926.05 287314 287308 81312006 101053 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY 102742 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLAN 217.80 LEAK LOCATOR 141406 000200602864 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 217.80 1,874.40 PANEL, TRIM 00005094 141524 688769 1552.6530 287309 81312006 100682 TRUGREEN- CHEMLAWN 2,223.35 ' 53.25 WEED CONTROL 00005236 141363 391241 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 58.58 WEED CONTROL 00005239 141364 391243 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 00005115 141448 92268976 855.26 WEED CONTROL 00005237 141365 MULTIPLE 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 967.09 287316 81312006 287310 813/2006 102489 TWIN CITY CONCRETE PRODUCTS CO 522.42 MORTAR 00005133 141522 0000298175 5932.6520 CONCRETE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 36.00- CREDIT 00005133 141523 0000298599 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 486.42 287311 813/2006 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE 39.19 WEATHERSTRIP 00005108 141521 185048 1551.6530 REPAIR PARTS 39.19 287312 8/3/2006 101049 UHL COMPANY 8& 8:15:09 Page - 27 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION CENT SVC PW BUILDING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL STORM SEWER GENERAL MAINTENANCE CITY HALL GENERAL 740.00 HUMIDIFER MAINTENANCE 141407 22434 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 740.00 287313 8/312006 103248 ULLRICH, CINDY 100.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 141696 072706 5620.6201 LAUNDRY EDINBOROUGH PARK 100.00 287314 8/3/2006 101053 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY 348.95 LIGHTING 00005910 141312 673921 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,874.40 PANEL, TRIM 00005094 141524 688769 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 2,223.35 ' 287315 8/312006 103298 UPS STORE #1715, THE 13.98 SHIPPING CHARGES 00005115 141448 92268976 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 13.98 287316 81312006 100050 USPS- HASLER 4,000.00 ACCT #75983 141697 072706 1550.6235 POSTAGE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 4,000.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 141472 145733 -00 5822.5513 CITY OF EDINA 50TH ST SELLING 16.00- 141473 145765 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE Council Check Register. 248.80 141619 146284 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 8/1/2006 -- 8/3/2006 144030-00- Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No. Subledger Account Description. 287317 8/3/2006 141622 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,245.55 1 332.65 CAN LINERS, CUPS 00006347 141366 644161 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 71.36 TISSUE 00006347 141367 644274 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 404.01 287318 8/3/2006 - 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 2,070.00 RENTAL CARTS 00006332 141698 25252 5423.6216 LEASE LINES 1,073.00 RENTAL CARTS 000.06336 141699 25253 54216216 LEASE LINES 3,143.00 _ 287319 8/3/2006 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 44.41 LIGHTING 00005288 141313 15049628 -00 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 44.41 LIGHTING 00005288 141313 15049628 -00 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 44.41 LIGHTING 00005288 141313 15049628 -00 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 44.41 LIGHTING 00005288 141313 15049628 -00 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 22.22- CREDIT 141314 15050112 -00 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 22.20- CREDIT 141314 15050112 -00 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 22.20= CREDIT 141314 15050112 -00 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 22.20- CREDIT 141314 15050112 -00 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 88.82 287320 8/3/2006 101080 WALSH, WILLIAM 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 141254 080306 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.00 287321 8/3/2006 103266 WELSH COMPANIES LLC 554.93 AUG MAINTENANCE 141315 080106 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 554.93 287322 8/3/2006 114588 WILSON, ROBERT C. 65.00 PROGRAM REGISTRATION 141727 072806 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 65.00 287323 8/312006 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 8/2/2006 8:15:09 Page - 28 _ Business Unit GRILL GRILL GOLF CARS GOLF CARS BUILDING 1v1A1NTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING DISTRIBUTION CITY HALL GENERAL DISTRIBUTION BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING CITY HALL GENERAL RESERVE PROGRAM YORK OCCUPANCY ASSESSING 734.35 141472 145733 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 16.00- 141473 145765 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 248.80 141619 146284 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 784.80 141620 144030-00- 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 272.80 141621 146289 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 220.80 141622 146290 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,245.55 1 R55CKREG ---i20000 CITYOI A 812r. 8:15:09 Council Check Register Page - 29 8/1/2006 -- 8/3/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 287324 8/3/2006 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 408.65 141623 163932 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,374.12 141624 161516 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 333.93 141625 163934 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 441.90 141626 163933 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING - 720.02 141627 161268 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING. 153.03- 141628 29751 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,125.59 - 287325 8/3/2006 120037 WISTE, MILDRED 41.87 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 141408 072606 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 41.87 - 287326 8/312006 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 513.00 141629 181621 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 423.50 141630 181700 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 85.50- 141631 181576 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 907.00 141747 181781 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,758.00 287327 8/312006 101087 WROBLESKI, HENRY 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 141258 080306 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 287328 8/312006 101726 XCEL ENERGY 284.77 51- 4197645 -8 141316 76579750 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 1,600.23 51- 5107681 -4 141317 76596657 5111.6185 LIGHT & POWER ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 1,085.36 51- 6223269 -1 141318 76622092 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 2,870.24 51- 5005454 -3 141319 76596398 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 58.76 51- 4420190 -3 141320 76739301 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 2,654.84 51- 5547446 -1 141321 76769338 1628.6185 LIGHT & POWER SENIOR CITIZENS 55.28 51- 6692497 -0 141700 76957937 1460.6185 LIGHT & POWER CIVILIAN DEFENSE 35.49 51 -6892224 -5 141701 76963751 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 36.52 51-6541084 -2 141702 76954691 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 116.08 51 -6050184 -2 141748 76977335 4086.6185 LIGHT & POWER AQUATIC WEEDS 123.31 51 -4197645 -8 141749 76890791 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 29,823.35 51. 4621797 -2 141750 76900765 1321.6185 - LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 9,934.64 51- 6955679 -8 141751 77134795 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENERAL 48,678.87 287329 8/3/2006 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 389.79 TONER 141728 195814681 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/1/2006 -- 8/312006 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 389.79 287330 8/312006 106270 YMCA 9.90 PARTIAL REFUND 141245 072406 5300.2039 151.10 PARTIAL REFUND 141245 072406 5301.4541 161.00 287331 813/2006 101572 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC 11,431.71 GUTTER BROOMS 00005411 141322 107610 1310.6523 11,431.71 287332 81312006 101091 ZIEGLER INC 79.67 FILTERS 00001742 141409 PC000911786 1553.6530 501.10 BATTERIES 00001541 141410 PC000912247 1553.6530 580.77 287333 8/1/2008 104146 R.E.C. INC 221,289.17 CLARK TIF NOTE 141754 072806 221,289.17 777,861.56 Grand Total 8/2/2006 8:15:09 Page - 30 Business Unit SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET GENERAL ADMISSIONS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES BROOMS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 1000.1303 DUE FROM HRA Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 777,861.56 Total Payments 777,861.56 STREET CLEANING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY Oh A Council Check Summary 8/1/2006 - 8/3/2006 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 502,823.97 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 18,162.09 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 4,676.40 05100 ART CENTER FUND 23,124.61 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 1,203.82 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 28,309.37 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 19,289.57 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 4,597.31 05600 EDINBOROUGH/CENT LAKES FUND 18,742.88 05800 LIQUOR FUND 130,128.02 05900 UTILITY FUND 24,710.60 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 522.42 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 1,570.50 Report Totals 777,861.56 8/2/.. 8:16:50 Page- 1 We confirm to the best of our b wledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing pplibles and 6 procedures 5r 8 � R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY G. AA 8&- 13:26:26 Council Check Register Page - 1 8/10/2006 - 8/10/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description - Business Unit 287334 8/10/2006 118536 A&B AUTO ELECTRIC INC. 157.63 AUTO REPAIRS 00005375 141811 47954 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 157.63 287335 8/10/2006 100613 AAA 1,128.49 T.E PLATE FOR 25.248 141810 080106 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,128.49 287336 8/10/2006 119577 ACCESS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 11,655.78 800MHz FIBER MOVE 00004362 141975 7496 05425.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PLANT #2 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYST 11,655.78 287337 8/10/2006 100715 ACCLAIM BENEFITS 405.90 FLEX ACCOUNT ADMIN 141878 358050 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 196.00 COBRA ADMIN 141879 357905 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 158.40 HRA ADMIN 141880 358206 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 760.30 287338 8/10/2006 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 36.84 142017 606885 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 35.56 142018 474363 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 93.24 142019 606829 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 42.12 142020 474368 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 47.40 142021 606845 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 21.56 142022 606841 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 46.68 142023 606831 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 99,24 142024 606830 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 116.42 142025 474366 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 97.96 142026 606842 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 637.02 287339 8/10/2006 100616 ACTION MAILING SERVICES INC. _ 319.42 MAIL PROCESSING 141755 201388 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 319.42 287340 BH0/2006 102626 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES 623.03 READY MIX 00005917 141756 4160113 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 519.19 READY MIX 00005917 141757 4160114 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 1,375.85 READY MIX 00005917 141936 4160556 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 830.70 READY MIX 00005917 141937 4160780 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 1,401.80 READY MIX 00005917 141938 4161058 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 4,760.57 CITY OF EDINA 8/9/2006 13:26:26 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 2 8/10/2006 — 8/10/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 287341 8/10/2006 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 241.95 COFFEE 141939 36402 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 241.95 287342 8110/2006 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 128.48 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 141881 73106 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 128.48 - 287343 8/1012006 103357 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO INC. 841.35 APC SMART UPS 141812 INV66512 2210.6711 NEW EQUIPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 841.35 - 287344 8/10/2006 103285 AMEM 125.00 CONFERENCE FEE 142179 080306 1460.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CIVILIAN DEFENSE 125.00 287345 811012006 116301 AMERICAN COLOR GRAPHICS INC. 183.00 BROCHURE 00009006 141882 453096 5110.6235 POSTAGE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,287.13 BROCHURE 00009006 141882 453096 5110.6575 PRINTING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,470.13 287346 8/10/2006 100630 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC. 334.41 PAPER 141813 10066776 -00 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 334.41 287347 8/10/2006 101874 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC. 624.31 MICROPHONES, WINDSCREENS 00003625 141940 43711 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 624.31 287348 8110/2006 102171 ANDERSON - JOHNSON ASSOCIATES 62,428.80 PROJECT ARCHITECT SERVICES 141976 060700706 47041.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT' COURTNEY CONCESSION BUILDING 62,428.80 287349 8/10/2006 102470 AON RISK SERVICES INC. OF MN 20,101.00 PREMIUM 141883 6100000084929 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 6,589.00 PREMIUM 141884 6100000084931 1550.6200 _ INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 26,690.00 287350 8/10/2006 104235 APPLIED MEDIA 100.00 PERFORMANCE 8/16/06 142169 080106 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 100.00 3,918.89 R55CKREG jG20000 CITY k NA 8 /:. , 13:26:26 Council Check Register Page - 3 8/10/2006 - 8/10/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description - Business Unit 287351 8/10/2006 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. 98.41 DE -FOAM 00005241 1.41941 29151 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 98.41 287352 8/10/2006 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 184.67 COFFEE 142180 402614 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 162.27 COFFEE 142181 402643 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 346.94 287353 8/1012006 119867 ATOMIC ARCHITECTURAL SHEET MET 12,587.50 GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION 142004 THREE 4401.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR 12,587.50 287354 8/10/2006 106217 BANTA, DON 400.00 SAFETY CAMP SPEAKER 141942 080206 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 400.00 287355 8/10/2006 105016 BARBEAU MARKETING GROUP INC. 6,812.28 AD COMMISSION 141758 072406 2210.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 6,812.28 287356 8/10/2006 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 23.53 BATTERIES 00001916 141977 18- 150575 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 225.67 BATTERIES 00001887 142182 18- 150156 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 127.79 BATTERIES 00001937 142183 16- 145618 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 376.99 267357 8110/2006 102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC. 221.10 BATTERIES 00005376 141885 C1227 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 221.10 287358 8/10/2006 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 1,120.74 142027 37830600 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 83.20 142028 37830800 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 340.00 142029 37830500 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS'SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 58.85 142030 41841100 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 152.21 142030 41841100 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 775.10 142031 37910600 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 158.84 142032 41871700 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1.229.95 - 142033 37830700 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,918.89 R55CKRE_G LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register. 8/1012006 - 8/10/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 287359 8110/2006 104656 BERGREN, JENNIFER 100.00 PROGRAM STAFF 142178 080806 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 100.00 287360 8/10/2006 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 21.98 PENS 00005360 141759 WO- 413336 -1 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 100.37 OFFICE SUPPLIES 141886 WO- 414051 -1 1166.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 80.30 OFFICE SUPPLIES 141978 OE- 64313 -1 1260.6406 'GENERAL SUPPLIES 64.19 OFFICE SUPPLIES 141979 OE- 64483 -1 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 320.20 MARKER BOARDS 142184 WO- 413741 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 31.06 NOTEBOOKS 00003033 142185 WO- 413133 -2 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 64.09 FOLDERS 142186 WO- 414061 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 682.19 287361 8/1012006 100653 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS 19,875.00 PAVEMENT REPAIR 00001103 141760 98897 47045.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 19,875.00 287362 8/10/2006 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 564.83 ROLLER KIT 00005195 141887 891007 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 84.82 SWITCH ASSEMBLIES 00001533 142187 885271 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 649.65 287363 8/1012006 103919 BRAEMAR MAILING SERVICE 174.15 ARSLE MAILING 142188 48166 1629.6575 PRINTING 174.15 287364 8110/2006 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 1,228.00 DRAP IMPLEMENTATION 141980 264342 01332.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 1,228.00 287365 8/1012006 120068 BRIN CONTRACT GLAZING 57,000.00 GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION 142005 ONE 4401.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 57,000.00 287366 8/10/2006 102220 BROWDER STONE COMPANY 201.79 KEY RING LIGHTS 00003630 141814 26406 1470.6614 FIRE PREVENTION . 201.79 287367 8/1012006 119826 BRYANT GRAPHICS INC. 573.00 4TH OF JULY BROCHURE 142189 8555 1627.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/9/2006 13:26:26 Page - 4 Business Unit ADAPTIVE RECREATION CENT SVC PW BUILDING FINANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL ENGINEERING GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL BREDESON PARK PATHWAY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ADAPTIVE RECREATION BA -332 S. LAKE CORNELIA NBHOOD GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR FIRE DEPT. GENERAL SPECIAL ACTIVITIES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OI- __.,JA 8/9 /i,. -.. 13:26:26 Council Check Register Page - 5 8/10/2006 — 8/10/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 573.00 287368 8/1012006 119466 CAMELOT METALS 66,878.10 GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION 142006 SEVEN 4401.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM_ CTR 66,878.10 287369 8/10/2006 108688 CANTON COMMUNICATIONS INC. 1,558.00 TELEVISION ADS 141981 060710 -1 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 1,558.00 287370 8/10/2006 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 595.50 142034 101243 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 14.05 142035 101230 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 460.90 142036 101229 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5,335.50 142037 101235 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 6,405.95 . 287371 8110/2006 112811 CASTREJON INC. 7,045.50 FINAL PAYMENT 141982 IT 05-01 F 46001.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIBER OPTIC CABLING 7,045.50 287372 8/10/2006 100681 CATCO 37.19 FITTINGS 00005166 141943 3-09687 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 37.19 - 287373 8/10/2006 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 10.33 5590919 -6 141815 7/24 7413.6582 FUEL OIL PSTF FIRE TOWER 10.33 287374 8/10/2006 102804 CENTURY COLLEGE 3,179.00 CPR INSTRUCTION 141816 00232435 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS - FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 3,179.00 287375 8/10/2006 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 46.20 142038 317739 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 46.20 287376 8/10/2006 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 4,000.00 PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDNESS 141888 080106 4205.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PANDEMIC FLU GRANT 8,758.00 PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDNESS 141888 080106 4204.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HEALTH ALERT NETWORK 12,758.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 242.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY OF EDINA ADVERTISING OTHER COMMUNICATIONS 287378 8/1012006 COMMUNICATIONS Council Check Register COMMUNICATIONS MAGAZINEINEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8/10/2006 - 8/10/2006 COURIER Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 287377 8/1012006 103040 CITY PAGES 2379 1140.6103 80.66 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 142190 100163757 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 80.66 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 142190 100163757 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 80.68 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 142190 100163757 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 8/9/2006 13:26:26 Page - 6 Business Unit BOTH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 242.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS ADVERTISING OTHER COMMUNICATIONS 287378 8/1012006 COMMUNICATIONS 105693 CITYSPRINT COMMUNICATIONS MAGAZINEINEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 12.97 COURIER 141889 2379 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 12.97 COURIER 141889 2379 1140.6103 13.09 COURIER 141889 2379 1140.6103 185.89 COURIER 141889 2379 1554.6230 224.92 287379 8/1012006 101345 COLOURS 1,000.00 DEVELOP LOGO 141761 9580 -02 2210.6103 668.00 BRAEMAR BOOKMARK DESIGN 141762 9599 2210.6103 265.00 4TH OF JULY AD DESIGN 141763 9604 2210.6122 265.00 BRAEMAR BOOK AD DESIGN 141764 9605 -01 2210.6122 1,438.00 PARADE TEMPLATE & PROGRAM 141765 9593 2210.6103 7,507.89 ABOUT TOWN DESIGN 141766 9566 2210.6123 8,352.63 ELDER EYE STANDARDS 141817 914 &01 2210.6103 4,132.20 ABOUT BUSINESS PRINTING 141818 9504 -A 2210.6123 8,298.35 ABOUT BUSINESS DESIGNS 141819 9504 -B 2210.6123 2,004.60 CABLE GRAPHICS 141820 9515 2210.6103 1,118.14 ABOUT BUSINESS INSERT 142191 9504 -01 2210.6123 35,049.81 287380 8110/2006 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 91.06 SAFETY GLASSES 00005311 141891 02868788 1301.6610 91.06 287381 811012006 101329 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC. 60.96 PLASTIC 00005285 141821 M080223 1314.6406 60.96 287382 8/10/2006 116356 CONSTRUCTION MIDWEST INC. 186.67 FORM ALIGNER 00005243 141822 365740 1647.6406 186.67 287383 8/10/2006 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 426.54 STONEWARE CLAY 00009198 141890 INV000021964 5120.5510 426.54 8/9/2006 13:26:26 Page - 6 Business Unit BOTH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS ADVERTISING OTHER COMMUNICATIONS ADVERTISING OTHER COMMUNICATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS MAGAZINEINEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 8/b.. ,j 13:26:26 Page - 7 - Business Unit CITY HALL GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS 140.50 142039 372748 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 271.50 R55CKREG LOG20000 142040 372743 5842.5514 CITY G. ,ANA 2,169.50 142041 372658 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER Council Check Register 1,787.75 142042 372659 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 8/10/2006 - 8/10/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 287384 8/10/2006 100513 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES IN 287390 8/10/2006 118490 DEEP ROCK WATER COMPANY 2,742.38 CUSTODIAL SERVICES 142192 109876 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 2,742.38 _ 287385 8/10/2006 102812 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 100701 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. 20.00 PERMIT FEE - INSPECTION 141946 29.43 PULLEY, BUSHING 00005249 141944 136001 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 141946 080406 29.43 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 70.00 GFI'S REPLACEMENT 141946 287386 8/10/2006 GENERAL SUPPLIES 100706 D.C. ANNIE SEWER INC. 80.00 PERMIT FEE - WEBER PARK 141946 080406 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 417.00 PUMP SUMP 141823 51460 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 417.00 PERMIT FEE - LIGHTING CONTACT 141946 080406 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 287387 8/1012006 101581 DAKOTA COUNTY TECHNICAL COLLEG 300.00 EMERGENCY RESPONSE DRIVING 141824 00045057 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 300.00 287388 8110/2006 103985 DAVE'S GREAT AD SHOP 1,100.00 TRAFFIC POSTER DESIGN 141983 1993 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,100.00 287389 8/1012006 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING 8/b.. ,j 13:26:26 Page - 7 - Business Unit CITY HALL GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS 140.50 142039 372748 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 271.50 142040 372743 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,169.50 142041 372658 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,787.75 142042 372659 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,869.45 142043 372661 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 8,238.70 287390 8/10/2006 118490 DEEP ROCK WATER COMPANY 393.94 ACCT 6091800 WATER 141945. 072606 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 393.94 _ 287391 8/10/2006 102812 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 20.00 PERMIT FEE - INSPECTION 141946 080406 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 25.00 INSPECTION BOOKS 141946 080406 1552.8406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 70.00 GFI'S REPLACEMENT 141946 080406 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 80.00 PERMIT FEE - WEBER PARK 141946 080406 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 90.00 PERMIT FEE - NORTH PANEL 141946 080406 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 90.00 PERMIT FEE - LIGHTING CONTACT 141946 080406 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 375.00 287393 8110/2006 CITY OF EDINA 119798 DOCUNET CORPORATION R55CKREG LOG20000 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 451.82 Council Check Register 141984 15177 1281.6104 8/10/2006 -111110/2006 Check # Date Amount Supptler ! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 287392 8110/2006 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST 287394 8/10/2006 469.30 141767 305343450 5610.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 18.00 141768 305343592 5430.6188 TELEPHONE 108.80 141768 305343592 5420.6188 TELEPHONE 132.50 141768 305343592 5511.6188 TELEPHONE 287393 8110/2006 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 119798 DOCUNET CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 451.82 CAREER MANUALS 141984 15177 1281.6104 451.82 287394 8/10/2006 112663 DOLLARS & SENSE 1,000.00 DIRECT MAILING ADVERTISING 142193 21646 5822.6122 1,000.00 DIRECT MAILING ADVERTISING 142193 21646 5842.6122 1,000.00 DIRECT MAILING ADVERTISING 142193 21646 5862.6122 3,000.00 287395 8/10/2006 119120 DONLAR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 19,394.17 GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION 142007 NINE 4401.6710 19,394.17 287396 811012006 100739 EAGLE WINE 1,695.70 142044 447819 5842.5513 169,12 142045 448846 5842.5513 1,588,81 142046 448838 5862.5513 1,695.70 142047 447774 5862.5513 700.09 142048 448842 5822.5513 5,849.42 287397 8110/2006 100740 EARL F. ANDERSEN INC. 678.62 LOOSE GRAVEL 00005287 142194 0073057 -IN 1325.6531 678.62 287398 8110/2006 119729 ECKMAN, PETER 150.00 PERFORMANCE 8/14/06 142166. 080106 5610.6136 150.00 287399 8/1012006 102955 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1,702.36 FIELD TRIPS TRANSPORTATION 142196 06-082 1624.6406 321.93 FIELD TRIPS TRANSPORTATION 142197 06 -084 1624.6406 2,024.29 4ONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 8/9/2006 13:26:26 Page- 8 - Business Unit ED ADMINISTRATION RICHARDS GOLF COURSE CLUB HOUSE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS - TRAINING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER R55CKREG LOG20000 5,951.10 CITY G. AA 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5,951.10 Council Check Register. 287405 811012006 8/10/2006 - 8/10/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 287400 8/10/2006 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 103594 EDINALARM INC. 675.93 268.38 ALARM SERVICE 142195 40557 5821.6250 ALARM SERVICE 511.20 ALARM SERVICE 142195 40557 5861.6250 ALARM SERVICE 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 536.76 ALARM SERVICE 142195 40557 5841.6250 ALARM SERVICE 1,316.34 287407 8110/2006 102669 FOSOA 287401 8110/2006 119119 ELECTRONIC RESOURCE CONTRACTOR 75.00 DUES 141827 080106 1470.6105 48,072.69 GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION 142008 NINE 4401.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 48,072.69 287408 8/10/2006 - 119211 FIRSTLAS 287402 811012006 105944 EMANUEL, LOU 36.50 DRUG TEST 141893 157916 1550.6121 93.00 OFFICIATING FEES 142174 080606 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 93.00 287409 8/10/2006 106192 FLAMING RIVER INDUSTRIES INC. 287403 8110/2006 120053 ERICKSON PLBG HTG CLG INC. 539.20 SWITCHES W/LOCK -OUT 00005200 141826 92149 1553.6530 2,365.00 EXHAUST FAN 00005690 141769 12024 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,365.00 287404 8/10/2006 100018 EXPERT T BILLING 8/b. . 13:26:26 Page - 9 Business Unit 50TH ST OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION WATER TREATMENT 5,951.10 JULY TRANSPORTS 142198 080306 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5,951.10 287405 811012006 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 675.93 BRAKE PARTS 00005203 141892 6- 849579 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 675.93 287406 8/10/2006 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY 447.69 BASES, ELBOWS, TEES 00001984 141825 MNSTU11093 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 447.69 287407 8110/2006 102669 FOSOA 75.00 DUES 141827 080106 1470.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 75.00 287408 8/10/2006 119211 FIRSTLAS 36.50 DRUG TEST 141893 157916 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 36.50 287409 8/10/2006 106192 FLAMING RIVER INDUSTRIES INC. 539.20 SWITCHES W/LOCK -OUT 00005200 141826 92149 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 539.20 R55CKREG LOG20000 4,326.60 CITY OF EDINA 819/2006 13:26:26 287416 8/1012006 Council Check Register Page - 10 956.25 8/10/2006 - 8/10/2006 330 2210.6124 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 287410 8110/2006 120062 FRANDSEN, JULIE 54.88 24.00 PROGRAM REFUND 141828 080106 1600.4390.01 PLAYGROUND PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 54.88 24.00 287418 8/10/2006 287411 8/10/2006 119121 GENERAL SHEET METAL 15.98 TRIGGER SPRINGS 142200 298525 90,084.00 GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION 142009 00009 4401.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR 90,084.00 287419 8/10/2006 101103 GRAINGER 287412 8110/2006 120076 GIONET, DANIEL 41.55 FUSES 00005119 141829 9148251904 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 11.29 SEASON TICKET REFUND 142177 080706 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 173.71 SEASON TICKET REFUND 142177 080706 5301.4532 SEASON TICKETS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 12.83 185.00 00005090 141832 9148251896 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 287413 8/1012006 101464 GIRARD'S BUSINESS SOLUTIONS IN 215.05 FOLDER MACHINE REPAIR 142199 081455 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 215.05 287414 8/1012006 101344 GLENN REHBEIN COMPANIES 223.65 FERTILIZER 00001993 141770 9862 1642.6540 FERTILIZER FIELD MAINTENANCE - 223.65 287415 8/1012006 102658 GLEWWE DOORS INC. 4,326.60 GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION 142010 FOUR 4401.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR COMMUNICATIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING PSTF OCCUPANCY CENT SVC PW BUILDING 4,326.60 287416 8/1012006 119936 GLOBAL OAK 956.25 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 141947 330 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT 956.25 287417 8/1012006 118941 GLOBALSTAR USA 54.88 R -91 PHONE 141948 75497 1470.6188 TELEPHONE 54.88 287418 8/10/2006 119737 GLOCK INC. 15.98 TRIGGER SPRINGS 142200 298525 1400.6551 AMMUNITION 15.98 287419 8/10/2006 101103 GRAINGER 41.55 FUSES 00005119 141829 9148251904 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 60.90 FUSES 00005119 141830 9148251912 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 77.68 BATTERIES 141831 9151391860 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 12.83 LAMP HOLDERS 00005090 141832 9148251896 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING PSTF OCCUPANCY CENT SVC PW BUILDING R65CKREG LOG20000 CITY O, ,.NA Council Check Register 8/10/2006 - 8110/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Atx:ount Description 12.83 LAMP HOLDERS 00005090 141832 9148251896 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 12.83 LAMP HOLDERS 00005090 141832 9148251896 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 12.84. LAMP HOLDERS 00006090 141832 9148251896 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 69.01 BATTERIES 00006478 141894 9141874827 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 87.93 SAFETY NOZZLES 00005356 142201 9164145792 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 388.40 287420 811012006 120075 GRAND CASINO MILLE LACS _ 85.42 CONFERENCE LODGING 00004124 142202 WICKLUND 1190.6106 MEETING EXPENSE 85.42 287421 8/10/2006 120075 GRAND CASINO MILLE LACS 85.42 CONFERENCE LODGING 00004123 142203 LOPEZ 1190.6106 MEETING EXPENSE 85.42 287422 8/10/2006 102613 GRANDVIEW TIRE & AUTO 48.00 ALIGNMENT 00005392 141949 354450 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 48.00 ALIGNMENT 00001230 141950 355392 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 96.00 287423 811012006 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 219.50 142049 83712 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 110.75 142050 83689 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 330.25 287424 8/1012006 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE 436.96 CORKSCREWS 141833 288743 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 436.96 287425 8110/2006 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 54.96 NIPPLIES, HUBS 00005297 141895 919187663 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 101.52 WIRING DEVICES 00005289 141896 919187664 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 16.73 WIRING DEVICES, IGNITORS 00005289 141897 919127148 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 25.24 WIRING DEVICES, IGNITORS 00005289 141897 919127148 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 152.52 WIRING DEVICES, IGNITORS 00005289 141897 919127148 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 358.88 WIRING DEVICES, IGNITORS 00005289 141897 919127148 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 709.85 287426 8/10/2006 101350 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO. 8/6___., 13:26:26 Page - 11 Business Unit CITY HALL GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CENT, SVC PW BUILDING ASSESSING ASSESSING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING CENT SVC PW BUILDING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING POOL OPERATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 706.44 FIVE BRIDGE LANE OREPAIRS 141985 061998 01312.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA312 BRIDGE LN & TOWNES RD 706.44 CITY OF E6INA 8/9/2006 13:26:26 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 12 8/10/2006 - 8110/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 287427 8110/2006 118195 GREEN HORIZONS 202.93 SPRINKLER REPAIR 141986 108724 01326.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS SUNNYSLOPE ST RECLAIM 202.93 287428 8110/2006 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 7.20 142051 448720 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 92.56 142052 448847 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 6,049.54 142053 448848 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,297.66 142054 448849 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,954.55 142055 446969 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,199.39 142056 445147 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,283.98 142057 448844 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 291.98 142058 446881 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5,246.80 142059 447675 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4,349.36 142060 448839 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 44.35 142061 448843 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,515.23 142062 448845 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 16.00- 142063 698701 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 16.00- 142064 698702 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 55.41- 142065 698821 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 16.00- 142066 698705 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 16.00- 142067 698700 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 112.50- 142068 698581 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 237.35- 142069 698822 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 27,863.34 287429 8/1012006 120063 GROETTUM, HERBERT 851.73 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 141834 080106 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 851.73 287430 811012006 100787 GRUBER'S POWER EQUIPMENT 276.90 HEDGE TRIMMER 00005238 141771 5879 1643.6556 TOOLS GENERAL TURF CARE 44.11 BLADES, TRIMMER LINE 00001979 141772. 34923 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 63.63 BLADES, TRIMMER LINE 00001979 141772 34923 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS MOWING 384.64 287431 8/1012006 114129 HALDEMAN HOMME INC. 51,666.70 GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION 142011 119338 4401.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW 8 COMM CTR 51,666.70 267432 8/10/2006 100791 H_ALLMAN OIL COMPANY 1,465.21 BULK OIL 00005051 141773 183643 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERA- ' GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY 0, AA 8/9,_ . 13:26:26 Council Check Register Page - 13 8110/2006 — 8/10/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,768.97 TRANSMISSION FLUID 00005051 141774 183645 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 541.55 BULK OIL 00005051 141775 183644 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3,775.73 287433 8/10/2006 103359 HANSON PIPE 8 PRODUCTS INC. 1,062.87 CATCH BASINS 00005140 141776 477006398611 5932.6536 CASTINGS GENERAL STORM SEWER 1,062.87 287434 8/10/2006 100795 HARRIS HOMEYER CO. 28,000.00 PREMIUM 141898 76773 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 2,975.00 PREMIUM 141899 74907 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 30,975.00 287435 8/10/2006 116838 HAYES INSTRUMENT CO INC 220.64 TOOLS 00004130 142204 481972 1260.6577 LUMBER ENGINEERING GENERAL 220.64 287436 8/10/2006 120054 HEINEMAN PAINTING INC. 1,343.00 PAINT TREATMENT PLANT #4 00001579 141777 072506 05453.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CHEMICAL RM. EXPANSION -PLANT 4 1,343.00 287437 8/10/2006 115377 HENRICKSEN PSG 27.69 KEYS 142205 358413 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 27.69 287438 8110/2006 118948 HINES 6 SONS INC. 28,310.00 GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION 142012 TEN 4401.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR 28,310.00 287439 8/10/2006 100805 HIRSHFIELD'3 256.28 PAINT, STRAINER, BRUSHES 00005358 142206 032199284 1343.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BRIDGES GUARD RAILS 256.28 287440 6/10/2006 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 528.25 142070 395418 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 621.40 142071 395421 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 84.00 142072 395422 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 16.00 142073 395423 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 307.85 142074 395419 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,557.50 287441 8/10/2006 101426 HUGHES, GORDON R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/9/2006 13:26:26 Council Check Register Page - 14 8/10/2006 - 8110/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 272.34 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 141835 080106 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION 272.34 287442 8/1012006 101732 INDUSTRIAL DOOR CO. INC. 1,651.92 DOOR #7 REPAIR 141836 0114541 -IN 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,651.92 287443 8110/2006 116191 INSTY- PRINTS _ 41.80 POSTER COPIES 141900 73954 -1513.6103 - PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS 140.75 INVITATIONS 141951 74156 2210.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS - 86.27 TRAFFIC POSTER 141987 74154 1265.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 218.94 NE TRANS STUDY FLYER 141988 74026 1265.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 157.30 PRIVATE WELL MAILING 141989 74077 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 645.06 287444 8/1012006 100202 JAMAR TECHNOLOGIES INC. 104.31 MASTIC TAPE 00005120 142207 77846 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 104.31 287445 8110/2006 102157 JEFF ELLIS & ASSOCIATES INC. 550.00 SUMMER AUDIT #3 141952 20029189 5310.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL ADMINISTRATION 550.00 287446 8/10/2006 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE .42 141953 073106 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH STREET GENERAL 4.20 141953 073106 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 5.38 141953 073106 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 7.98 141953 073106 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 18.72 141953 073106 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 20.00 141953 073106 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW REVOLVING 34.00 141953 073106 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 34.01 141953 073106 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 37.76 141953 073106 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 39.81 141953 073106 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 45.61 141953 073106 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 67.77 141953 073106 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 78.29 141953 073106 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 89.16 141953 073106 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 91.20 141953 073106 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 116,89 141953 073106 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 206.68 141953 073106 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. - GENERAL 232.01 141953 073106 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENP R55CKREG x_-20000 Check # Date 287447 8/1012006 Amount Supplier / Explanation 253.13 50TH ST SELLING 656.69 50TH ST SELLING 796.14 50TH ST SELLING 1,219.34 50TH ST SELLING 4,055.19 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 100830 JERRY'S PRINTING 115.32 BUSINESS CARDS 115.39 BUSINESS CARDS 153.76 BUSINESS CARDS 266.25 RETURN ENVELOPES 650.72 CITY OF A Council Check Register 8/10/2006 - 8)10/2006 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 141953 073106 5630.6406 141953 073106 5422.6406 141953 073106 1646.6406 141953 073106 4090.6406 141837 37036 141837 37036 141837 37036 00009192 141901 36840 287448 8/10/2006 102136 JERRY'S TRANSMISSION SERVICE 100.00 REPAIRS 00005057 141778 0007231 143.14 DOOR CHECK 00005050 141838 0007454 181.09 VALVE STEM KITS 00001231 141839 0007144 424.23 287449 811012006 102146 JESSEN PRESS 630.00 PRE -PAID ENVELOPES 141954 080306 630.00 PRE -PAID ENVELOPES 141954 080306 729.53 AR &LE BROCHURES 142208 54550 1,989.53 287450 8/10/2006 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 714.60 142075 1002806 6,853.96 142076 1007662 34.50 142077 1007665 600.00 142078 1007666 10,236.62 142079 1007672 5,736.29 142080 1007664 24,175.97 287452 8/10/2006 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 1,508.06 142081 1116590 270.71 142082 1116589 427.29 142083 1116588 815.65 142084 1116593 1,243.49 142085 1116591 ,34 142086 1116592 199.06 142087 1116587 5822.6406 5862.6406 5842.6406 5110.6575 1553.6180 1553.6180 1553.6180 1260.6406 5913.6406 1629.6575 5822.5514 5862.5514 5822.5515 5822.5514 5842.5514 5822.5514 5822.5513 5822.5513 5822.5513 5822.5512 5822.5512 5822.5515 5822.5512 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES taENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES PRINTING CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES PRINTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 8/91. 13:26:26 Page - 15 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS BUILDING MAINTENANCE STREET REVOLVING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ENGINEERING GENERAL DISTRIBUTION ADAPTIVE RECREATION 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/9/2006 13:26:26 Council Check Register Page - 16 8/10/2006 - 8/10/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description - Business Unit 28.92 142088 1112952 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 62.50 142089 1116611 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1.37 142090 1116597 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 389.62 142091 1116606 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,777.70 142092 1116608 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 187.68 142093 1116609 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,166.52 142094 1116610 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 770.78 142095 1116607 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,018.65 142096 1116598 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,596.12 142097 1116612 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5,065.22 142098 1116602 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 6.52 142099 1112944 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 6.87 142100 1105956 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 11,931.37 142101 1112947 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 6,150.72 142102 1112946 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 468.88 142103 1114748 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1.03 142104 1116595 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,671.65 142105 1116605 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,804.41 142106 1116600 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 232.15 142107 1116601 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 159.09 142108 1116594 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 190.56 142109 1116599 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING .34 142110 1116596 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,518.81 142111 1116604 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 43,672.08 287453 811012006 102719 JOHNSON, PHILLIP 29.98 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 141902 080106 5125.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 44.64 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 141902 080106 5125.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD MEDIA STUDIO 47.45 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 141902 080106 5125.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 74.81 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 141902 080106 5125.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 196.88 _ 287454 8/10/2006 116394 JOHNSTON, STEVE 125.00 PERFORMANCE 8/15/06 142168 080106 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 125.00 287455 8/10/2006 111018 KEEPRS INC. 262.64 UNIFORMS 00003612 141840 54424 -02 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 262.64 UNIFORMS 00003612 141841 54297 -02 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 72.00 UNIFORM- 142209 55752 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 597.28 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY O. ,ANA 8&. 13:26:26 Council Check Register Page - 17 8/10/2006 — 8/10/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description _ Business Unit 287456 8/10/2006 105606 KELUNGTON CONSTRUCTION INC. 1,111.50 GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION 142013 TWO 4401.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR 1,111.50 287457 8110/2006 105990 KELLY GREEN IRRIGATION INC. 883.14 SPRINKLER REPAIR 141990 37576 01332.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA -332 S. LAKE CORNELIA NBHOOD 883.14 287458 8/10/2006 101502 KONTERS, VIK 158.41 REIMBURSE FOR CAMERA 142210 080306 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 158.41 287459 8/1012006 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 131.99 LOCK NUTS, WASHERS 00005276 141842 4659817 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 260.90 HEX NUTS, SCREWS 00005301 141903 4678271 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 321.03 MARKING PAINT 00005303 141904 4678272 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 713.92 287460 8/1012006 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 4,073.25 DEDUCTIBLE 141905 0200104704 -6/06 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 4,073.25 287461 8/1012006 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 3,003.23 DEDUCTIBLE 141906 0200104704 -7/06 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 3,003.23 287462 811012006 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 108,328.75 PREMIUM 141907 9045 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 108,328.75 287463 8/10/2006 100853 LEEF SERVICES 33.21 SHOP TOWELS 141908 - 1173740 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS ' 33.21 287464 8/10/2006 106301 LOFFLER COMPANIES INC. 62.72 COPIER USAGE 00001512 142211 155284 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 62.72 287465 8/10/2006 100858 LOGIS 1,191.00 141779 27180 2210.6160 DATA PROCESSING COMMUNICATIONS 2,046.00 141779 27180 1120.6160 DATA PROCESSING ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 8/1012006 CITY OF EDINA 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP Council Check Register 517.71 8/1012006 - 8/10/2006 142112 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 2,395.00 141779 27180 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING 2,543.00 141779 27180 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING 4,205.00, 141779 27180 5910.6160 DATA PROCESSING 4,503.00 141779 27180 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING 5,136.00 141779 27180 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING 287466 8/1012006 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 517.71 142112 205229 5822.5515 517.71 287467 8/1012006 100864 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. 214.76 GASKETS, SPRING 00005163 142212 2065118 1553.6530 52.62 TEMPERATURE GAUGE 00005397 142213 2065055 1553.6530 267.38 287468 8110/2006 100868 MARK VII SALES 3,592.40 142113 977042 5842.5514 336.00 142114 977041 5842.5514 1,444.54 142115 976439 5822.5514 2,937.32 142116 979438 5842.5514 2,921.95 142117 976684 5862.5514 1,767.20 142118 977523 5862.5514 92.25 142119 977524 5862.5515 3,239.34 142120 979216 5822.5514 16,331.00 287469 8/10/2006 103280 MARLIN COMPANY, THE 586.57 COMMUNICATIONS PROGRAM 00005377 141843 368520 1280.6104 586.57 287470 8/10/2006 106583 MCDONALD, JOANNA 15.00 PROGRAM REFUND 141844 073106 1600.4390.21 15.00 287471 8110/2006 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 2,639.25 SHOWBOAT TRIP 141955 080306 1628.6103.07 - 2,639.25 287472 8/1012006 100953 MEDTRONIC EMERGENCY RESPONSES 937.50 LIFEPAK MAINTENANCE CONTRACTI0003644 141845 PC907378 1470.6215 937.50 'COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIREARM SAFETY TRAINING TRIPS PROF SERVICES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 8/9/2006 13:26:26 Page - 18 Business Unit INSPECTIONS CENT SERV GEN = MIS GENERAL (BILLING) ASSESSING FINANCE " 50TH ST SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN YORK SELLING YORK SELLING BOTH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING SUPERVISION 8 OVERHEAD PARK ADMIN. GENERAL SENIOR CITIZENS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY 01 _,iNA Council Check Register 8/10/2006- - 8/10/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 287473 8/10/2006 101457 MEICHSNER, EARL 121.04 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 142176 080706 1652.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 8/1-. 13:26:26 Page - 19 Business Unit WEED MOWING 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1301.6518 BLACKTOP 121.04 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 1301.6518 287474 8/10/2006 1314.6518 102281 MENARDS STREET RENOVATION 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 5422.6581 242.82 TABLES 00004132 141780 32093 242.82 287475 8110/2006 100882 MERIT SUPPLY 72.24 WRENCHES 00005043 141956 70059 72.24 287476 8110/2006 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 216.51 WHITE FIELD PAINT 00001997 141781 93012 2,169.94 SOCCER NETTING 00005258 141991 93114 2,386.45 287477 8/1012006 104049 METRO FIRE 956.32 RIT BAGS 00003647 141846 24893 956.32 287478 811012006 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 368.17 ASPHALT 00005909 141782 81471MB 17,870.57 ASPHALT 00005909 141782 81471MB 293.94 ASPHALT 00005909 141783 81300MB 18,172.39 ASPHALT 00005909 141783 81300MB 36,705.07 287479 8/10/2006 100692 MIDWEST COCA-COLA EAGAN 187.40 142121 68064706 216.00 142122 68064208 403.40 287480 8110/2006 103186 MIDWEST FUELS 990.21 GAS 00006070 141909 37184 584.25 DIESEL FUEL 00006071 141910 37186 867.74 GAS 00006070 141911 37238 384.80 DIESEL FUEL. 00006071 141912 37240 2,827.00 287481 8/10/2006 100522 MINNESOTA AIR INC. 8/1-. 13:26:26 Page - 19 Business Unit WEED MOWING 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA . Council Check Register 8/10/2006 — 8/10/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 180.38 MOTOR, BIT HOLDER 00005295 141784 2069219 -00 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS 180.38 287482 8/10/2006 103260 MINNESOTA NURSERY& LANDSCAPE 95.00 WORKSHOP 00001969 141992 IVC11940 1640.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 95.00 287483 8/10/2006 118144 MINNESOTA PREMIER PUBLICATIONS 825.00 MN PARENT ADVERTISING 141785 14033 .2210.6122 =ADVERTISING OTHER 825.00 287484 8/10/2006 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. 1,533.60 ASPHALT EMULSION 00005924 141786 50882 1314.6519 ROAD OIL 1,533.60 ASPHALT EMULSION 00005924 141787 50881 1314.6519 ROAD OIL 3,067.20 287485 8/10/2006 103240 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL 252.00 DEFENSIVE DRIVING CLASS 141959 019056 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 252.00 287486 8/10/2006 101559 MINNESOTA STATE FIRE CHIEFS AS 165.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION. 141958 080306 1470.6104 _CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 165.00 287487 8/1012006 105430 MINNESOTA SUPPLY COMPANY 1,160.85 PARTITIONS 00001451 142214 M55726 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,160.85 287488 8/10/2006 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER 90.27 BALL VALVES 00005290 141847 0069756 -IN 1335.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 90.27 287489 8/1012006 112769 MINUTI -OGLE CO. INC. 3,205.30 GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION 142014 THREE 4401.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 3,205.30 287490 8/10/2006 100898 MINVALCO - 26.84 FIN STRAIGHTENER 00005302 141849 553871 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 26.84 287491 8110/2006 101316 MMBA 1,666.66 ANNUAL DUES 142215 073106 5820.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 8/9/2006 13:26:26 Page - 20 — Business Unit CENT SVC PW BUILDING PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION SENIOR CITIZENS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING PAVEMENT MARKINGS GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 50TH STREET GENE'"' R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY V, - )INA 13:26:26 Council Check Register Page - 21 8/10/2006 - 8110/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,666.66 ANNUAL DUES 142215 073106 5840.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 1,666.68 ANNUAL DUES 142215 073106 5860.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 5,000.00 287492 8/10/2006 101316 MMBA 50.00 BEVERAGE ALCOHOL TRAINING 142216 2006 -29 5820.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET GENERAL 50.00 BEVERAGE ALCOHOL TRAINING 142216 2006 -29 5840.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 50.00 BEVERAGE ALCOHOL TRAINING 142216 2006 -29 5860.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 150.00 287493 8/10/2006 101917 MN FIRE SERVICE CERTIFICATION 165.00 FFII CERTIFICATIONS (3) 141957 080206 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 165.00 287494 8110/2006 119770 MONEY MAILER TC SOUTHWEST 380.00 DIRECT MAIL ADVERTISING 141850 230 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 380.00 DIRECT MAIL ADVERTISING 141850 230 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 380.00 DIRECT MAIL ADVERTISING 141850 230 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 1,140.00 287495 8/10/2006 100159 MOOERS PRINTING INC. 57.51 ENVELOPES 00003636 141848 4518 1470.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 57.51 287496 8/1012006 102395 MDSE, WILLIAM 232.50 OFFICIATING FEES 142172 080606 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 232.50 287497 8/10/2006 120064 MTD COMMUNICATIONS INC. 100.00 HOTEL GUIDE AD 141851 484 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 100.00 HOTEL GUIDE AD 141851 484 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 100.00 HOTEL GUIDE AD 141851 484 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 300.00 287498 8/10/2006 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 1,421.70 GREENS MOWER BEDKNIVES 00006485 141913 537370 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 281.35 GREENS MOWER ELECTRICAL PARTS 141914 535158 -00 . 5422.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 350.13 REAR AXLE 00006484 141915 536876 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 375.00 DRIVE ASSEMBLY 00005250 142217 539599 -00 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,428.18 287499 8/1012006 116368 NATIONAL ANIMAL CONTROL ASSOC. R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/9/2006 13:26:26 Council Check Register Page - 22 8/10/2006 — 8/10/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 495.00 NACA TRAINING 142218 073106 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 495.00 287500 8110/2006 100921 NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE 191.68 MEMORY CARDS 00004127 141960 0717607ZWIG 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 191.68 287501 8/1012006 100922 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS 993.44 SIGNS 00001972 142219 TI -0162578 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 993.44 287502 8110/2006 104672 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 727.16 141961 757391129 -044 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 727.16 287503 8110/2006 103072 NORTHERN AIR CORPORATION 7,196.25 GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION 142015 FIVE 4401.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR 7,196.25 287504 8/10/2006 120067 NUMARA SOFTWARE INC. 874.52 HELPDESK SOFTWARE 00004367 141993 320776 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 874.52 287505 8/1012006 100939 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC. 168.63 COOKIES 141916 23049563 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 168.63 287506 8110/2006 120066 PALMER WEST CONSTRUCTION CO IN 22,235.00 ART CENTER ROOF REPAIRS 00005868 141962 4743 5100.1720 BUILDINGS ART CENTER BALANCE SHEET 22,235.00 287507 8/1012006 103906 PARSONS 159.32 MOVE DATAJACK 141994 91200 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS _ 159.32 287508 8110/2006 101718 PARTS PLUS 26.33 AUTO PARTS 141963 073106 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 4,206.32 AUTO PARTS 141963 073106 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ' 4,232.65 287509 8/1012006 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 1,375.02 142123 8116414 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG uG20000 CITY C, AA 8/a. 13:26:26 Council Check Register Page - 23 8/10/2006 - 8/10/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description - Business Unit 97.98 K9 -2 BOARDING 2,414.50 1682 142124 8116412 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,410.30 287514 142125 8116415 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,199.82 1,998.62 142126 2357614 5842.5512 287510 8110/2006 110832 PC2 SOLUTIONS, INC. 2357616 5842.5515 1,641.35 142128 1,205.27 IT CONSULTING 141995 72906008 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2357617 5862.5513 1,205.27 47.28 142130 2357618 5862.5515 287511 8110/2006 603.84 100674 PENHALL COMPANY 142131 2357619 5862.5512 1,743.90 275.00 CONCRETE CUTTING 00005326 141788 43939 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 142133 2357612 275.00 9,662.37 287512 8/10/2006 8110/2006 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 116619 PIPELINE SUPPLY INC. 55.39 371.00 141918 141917 33314801 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 287513 8/10/2006 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 105806 PERFORMANCE KENNELS INC. COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 97.98 K9 -2 BOARDING 142220 1682 4607.6406 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 97.98 287514 8/10/2006 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 1,998.62 142126 2357614 5842.5512 47.28 142127 2357616 5842.5515 1,641.35 142128 2357615 5842.5513 3,213.65 142129 2357617 5862.5513 47.28 142130 2357618 5862.5515 603.84 142131 2357619 5862.5512 1,743.90 142132 2357613 5822.5513 366.45 142133 2357612 5822.5512 9,662.37 287515 8110/2006 116619 PIPELINE SUPPLY INC. 55.39 HAZARD STAKE PIPE 00006481 141918 S2256846.002 5422.6406. 141.33 HAZARD STAKE PIPE 00006481 141919 S2256846.003 5422.6406 196.72 287516 811012006 106071 PLAYWORKS OF PRIOR LAKE 8.78 PARTIAL REFUND 141852 073106 5300.2039 135.22 PARTIAL REFUND 141852 073106 5301.4541 144.00 287517 8/10/2006 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE GENERAL ADMISSIONS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 142140 698899 CITY OF EDINA YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 287521 8/1012006 101877 PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY Council Check Register 5.31 COBRA 142222 080106 5.31 VERNON SELLING 8/10/2006 - 8/1012006 287522 8110/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description VERNON SELLING 5822.5514 378.68 DISMOUNTIMOUNT, SERVICE 00005059 141964 560543 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES 142141 378.68 1,024.60 142142 739182 -00 5,326.04 287518 8/10/2006 739821 -00 100961 POSTMASTER 142144 739206 -00 4,001.99 142145 375.00 NEWSLETTER POSTAGE 142221 080406 1628.6235 POSTAGE 142147 375.00 442.98 142148 740290 -00 14.05 287519 8/10/2006 732330 -00 100964 PRECISION TURF & CHEMICAL 142150 _ 56.00 698.64 FUNGICIDE 00006483 141920 27682 3422.6545 - CHEMICALS 698.64 287520 8/1012006 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 2,320.02 142134 447926 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 205.90 142135 447925 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 900.62 142136 448745 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 46.65 142137 448744 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 2,640.98 142138 448783 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 28.04 142139 446806 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 7.20- COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 142140 698899 6,135.01 YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 287521 8/1012006 101877 PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY 50TH ST SELLING 5.31 COBRA 142222 080106 5.31 VERNON SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 287522 8110/2006 104669 PURE BLUE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 245.00 MERCHANDISE 141965 74885 245.00 VERNON SELLING 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 287523 8/10/2006 100971 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,252.83 142141 740187 -00 1,024.60 142142 739182 -00 5,326.04 142143 739821 -00 1,587.46 142144 739206 -00 4,001.99 142145 739812 -00 1,392.67 142146 740426-00 1,926.85 142147 740188 -00 442.98 142148 740290 -00 14.05 142149 732330 -00 189.00 142150 740398 -00 56.00 142151 740399 -00 2,497.87 142152 739813 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE 5310.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 8/9/2006 13:26:26 Page - 24 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SENIOR CITIZENS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL POOL ADMINISTRATION 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING y R55CKREG - ,.720000 CITY Of A 8/91. 13:26:26 Council Check Register, Page - 25 8110/2006 = 8/10/2006 Check # Date Amount Suppller / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,140.63 142153 740189 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 21,852.97 287524 8/10/2006 101965 QWEST 81.13 952 929 -9549 141853 9549 -7106 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 96.26 952 927 -8861 141921 8861 -7/06 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 54.76 952 929 -0297 141922 0297 -7/06 4090.6188 TELEPHONE STREET REVOLVING 54.87 612 Z28 -0146 141966 0146 -7/28 5911.6188 TELEPHONE PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER 57.62 612 Z28 -0146 141966 0146 -7/28 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 85.81 612 Z28 -0146 141966 0146 -7/28 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY - 98.98 612 Z28 -0146 141966 0146 -7/28 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 100.37 612 Z28 -0146 141966 0146 -7/28 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 163.02 612 Z28 -0146 141966 0146 -7/28 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 166.98 612 Z28 -0146 141966 0146 -7/28 5610.6188 TELEPHONE ED ADMINISTRATION 191.89 612 Z28 -0146 141966 0146 -7/28 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 232.21 612 Z28 -0146 141966 0146 -7/28 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 255.48 612 Z28 -0146 141966 0146 -7/28 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 263.51 612 Z28 -0146 141966 0146 -7/28 5932.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL STORM SEWER 2,440.59 612 Z28 -0146 141966 0146 -7/28 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 4,343.48 287525 8/1012006 100466 R & R PRODUCTS INC. 775.00 VERTI -CUT UNIT 00006461 141923 CD862517 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 775.00 _ 287526 8/10/2006 113422 RAKE PUBLISHING INC. 200.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 141854 8897 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 200.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 141854 8897 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 200.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 141854 8897 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 600.00 287527 8/10/2006 101111 REED BUSINESS INFORMATION 156.88 AD FOR BID 141789 3330257 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 156.88 287528 8110/2006 119755 RICCI, PATRICE 139.50 OFFICIATING FEES 142171 080606 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 139.50 287529 8/10/2006 119118 RICH PRAIRIE PAINTERS 8,858.75 GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION 142016 TWO 4401.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR 8,858.75 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/9/2006 13:26:26 Council Check Register Page - 26 8110/2006 -- 8/10/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description _ Business Unit 287530 8/10/2006 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 1,875.50 INSTALLED EYEWASH STATION 1.41967 43550 5311.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL OPERATION 1,875.50 287531 811012006 114489 RICOH CORPORATION 64.50 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 141855 G072500194 -21 7411.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS PSTF OCCUPANCY 64.50 287532 8110/2006 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 30.52 SOFTENER SALT 00003648 141968 00180616 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 30.52 287533 8/10/2006 116393 ROGERS, RUSS 150.00 PERFORMANCE 8/17106 142170 080106 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 287534 8/1012006 118001 ROZEBOOM MILLER ARCHITECTS INC 3,123.90 GYM ARCHITECT FEES 141996 16 4401.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR 3,123.90 287535 8/10/2006 119859 SANDELIN, CARRIE 61.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 142175 080706 1624.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLAYGROUND & THEATER 61.00 287536 8110/2006 100990 SCHARBER & SONS 21.03 SWITCH 00001540 142223 360993 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 21.03 287537 8/10/2006 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 74.23 LUMBER, BLADES 00005240 141997 40344099 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 74.23 287538 8/10/2006 119799 SCHIMETZ, SCOTT 69.75 OFFICIATING FEES 142173 080606 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 69.75 287539 8/10/2006 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. 237.73 RESTORE SERVICE 141790 7150767889 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 552.48 QUARTERLY BILLING 141791 8101599761 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 545.61 QUARTERLY BILLING 00005383 141.924 8101600787 1375.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKING RAMP 1,335.82 8/6, . 13:26:26 Page - 27 Business Unit RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 916 91 OFFICE SIGNS 141792 37866 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 916.91 287544 8/10/2006 103249 SHANNON, JIM 125.00 PERFORMANCE 8115/06 142167 080106 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 7 125.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 8/10/2006 CITY O, .NA 511.20 Council Check Register 144027 -01 2210.6575 PRINTING 8/10/2006 - 8/10/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 287540 8/10/2006 101970 SCOTT COUNTY NURSERY INC 3,204.00 SPORT PROGRAMS ' 141793 324620630 1600.4390 REGISTRATION FEES 404.70 MULCH 00006466 141969 D- 30818 5431.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK 404.70 811012006 104098 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 287541 8110/2006 105550 SCRAP METAL PROCESSORS INC. 10,980.29 MICROSOFT EA TRUEUP RENEWAL00004370 141999 ED5139 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING 150.00 AUG CONTAINER CHARGE 00005396 142224 D- COE6 -08 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 150.00 8/10/2006 101021 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC - 287542 8/10/2006 100992 SEARS COMMERCIAL ONE ACCOUNT 42.01 PROPANE, GASOLINE 141857 072506 1553.6581 GASOLINE 36.19 FILTERS 00005116 141925 T194376 1553.6406 GENERAL_ SUPPLIES 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 36.19 106.61 PROPANE, GASOLINE 141857 072506 287543 8/10/2006 104689 SERIGRAPHICS SIGN SYSTEMS INC. 201.85 8/6, . 13:26:26 Page - 27 Business Unit RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 916 91 OFFICE SIGNS 141792 37866 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 916.91 287544 8/10/2006 103249 SHANNON, JIM 125.00 PERFORMANCE 8115/06 142167 080106 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION COMMUNICATIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL CENT SERV GEN - MIS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN STREET RENOVATION GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 125.00 287545 8/10/2006 102995 SHAPCO PRINTING INC. 511.20 JULY NEWSLETTER 141998 144027 -01 2210.6575 PRINTING 511.20 287546 8/10/2006 106415 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY 3,204.00 SPORT PROGRAMS ' 141793 324620630 1600.4390 REGISTRATION FEES 3,204.00 287547 811012006 104098 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 10,980.29 MICROSOFT EA TRUEUP RENEWAL00004370 141999 ED5139 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING 10,980.29 287548 8/10/2006 101021 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC 42.01 PROPANE, GASOLINE 141857 072506 1553.6581 GASOLINE 53.23 PROPANE, GASOLINE 141857 072506 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 106.61 PROPANE, GASOLINE 141857 072506 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 201.85 287549 8/10/2006 100181 SPEEDY KEYS 55.00 NEW LOCK FOR GATE 00005363 141856 K060551 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 55.00 COMMUNICATIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL CENT SERV GEN - MIS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN STREET RENOVATION GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/9/2006 13:26:26 Council Check Register Page - 28 8110/2006 - 8/10/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description - Business Unit 287550 8110/2006 120061 SPRINGER EXTERIORS LLC 8,065.00 NEW ROOF 1.41858 11269 2127.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMM DEV BLK GRANT 8,065.00 287551 8/10/2006 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC 99.88 HYTRAN DISPLAYS 00005199 141794 SI48621 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 336.08 LOADER REPAIR 00005371 141859 SF03917 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 435.96 287552 8H0 12006 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 854.14 WANT ADS 141970 073106 5310.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER POOL ADMINISTRATION 2,861.29 WANT ADS 141970 073106 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 3,715.43 287553 8/10/2006 117992 STRINGER BUSINESS SYSTEMS 28.91 COPIER USAGE 142225 1185097 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 28.91 287554 8/10/2006 104349 STRUCTURED NETWORK SOLUTIONS 58.00 KEYLESS ENTRY SYSTEM 142000 12379 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 122.44 DATA CABLES 142000 12379 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 980.74 FIRE STA #2 WALL CABINET 142001 12265 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 165.00 KEYLESS ENTRY SYSTEM 142002 12349 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 390.00 FIRE STA #2 TECH WIRING 142003 12217 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,716.18 287555 8/10/2006 101017 SUBURBAN, CHEVROLET 301.58 SWITCH 00005041 141795 448572CVW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 115.00 DOOR REPAIR 00005056 141796 CTCB506116 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 38.15 GASKET 00005204 141860 449693CVW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 60.41 KEYS 00005362 141861 446220CVW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 515.14 287556 8110/2006 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. 1,608.45 TIRES 00005205 141926 10056476 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,608.45 287557 8/10/2006 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 32.18 PUBLISH NOTICE 141862 881574 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 39.33 PUBLISH NOTICE 141863 881573 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 25.03 PUBLISH NOTICE 141864 881572 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION � 1 • T R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY L NA Council Check Register 8/10/2006 - 8/10/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 85.80 AD FOR BID 141865 881571 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL _ 182.34 287558 8/1012006 119864 SYSCO MINNESOTA 579.50 CONCESSION PRODUCT 141797 607281719 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 500.98 CONCESSION PRODUCT 141798 607221552 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 121.95 TOWELS, TISSUE 141927 608011142 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 308.47 CONCESSION PRODUCT 141927 608011142 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,510.90 287559 8/10/2006 117686 TECHNAGRAPHICS 255.60 POLICE ADVISORY CARD 142226 601917 -01 1400.6575 PRINTING 165.08 PARKING REG ADVISORY. 142227 601918 -01 1400.6575 PRINTING 203.93 PROPERTY LOSS INVENTORY 142228 1004011 1400.6575 PRINTING 525.05 AUTO IMPOUND REPORTS 142229 1003011 1400.6575 PRINTING 1,149.66 287560 8/1012006 101326 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO 28.57 SWITCH 00001542 141866 32642 -01 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 28.57 287561 8/1012006 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 112.70 142154 418844 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 6,284.10 142155 418843 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 6,396.80 287562 8/1012006 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 107.53 TORCH SUPPLIES 00001998 141799 126672 1646.6556 TOOLS 107.53 287563 811012006 100682 TRUGREEN- CHEMLAWN 143.78 WEED CONTROL 00005253 141867 391228 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 53.25 WEED CONTROL 141868 391236 1470.6101 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 111.83 WEED CONTROL 141869 391244 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 106.50 WEED CONTROL 00005253 141870 391232 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 415.36 287564 8/10/2006 101045 TURF SUPPLY COMPANY 1,166.18 FUNGICIDE 00006487 141928 101301 5422.6545 CHEMICALS 1,166.18 287565 8/10/2006 101053 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY 8/a. , 13:26:26 Page - 29 - Business Unit ADMINISTRATION POOL CONCESSIONS POOL CONCESSIONS POOL OPERATION POOL CONCESSIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING BUILDING MAINTENANCE CITY HALL GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL TURF CARE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/10/2006 - 8/1012006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 70.17 CONDUIT, COUPLINGS 00005306 141929 717385 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS 8/9/2006 13:26:26 Page - 30 Business Unit CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1400.6235 POSTAGE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL -5822.6512 -PAPER SUPPLIES 70.17 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 287566 8110/2006 VERNON SELLING 100050 USPS- HASLER PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 00005134 141874 15049727 -01 1,000.00 TMS #202739 142230 080406 15049727 -01 1552.6406 1,000.00 287567 8/1012006 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 510.44 BAGS 141800 001977 -00 334.04 BAGS 141930 001974 -00 24.25 UTENSILS 00007513 142231 001990-00 852.49 BAGS, TOWELS 00007513 142231 001990 -00 1,721.22 287568 8110/2006 119564 VANDER ZANDEN, JESSICA 57.00 PROGRAM REFUND 141871 080106 57.00 287569 8/1012006 102734 VEIT & COMPANY INC 500.00 HYDRANT RENTAL REFUND 141872 073106 500.00 287570 8/10/2006 106308 VEITH, MICHELLE 227.07 NATURE CAMP SUPPLIES 142232 080406 227.07 287571 8/10/2006 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 62.71 HUB, NIPPLES 00005299 141931 1063802 507.50 GFI RECEPTACLES, COVERS 00005299 141932 1063990 570.21 287572 8/10/2006 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 559.18 GLOVES, FLASHLIGHTS 00005242 141873 179250 33.00 SAFETY HATS, GLASSES 00005304 141971 179372 122.56 SAFETY HATS, GLASSES 00005304 141971 179372 714.74 287573 8/10/2006 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 8/9/2006 13:26:26 Page - 30 Business Unit CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1400.6235 POSTAGE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL -5822.6512 -PAPER SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 1600.4390.04 NATURE CAMP PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 5901.4626 SALE OF WATER UTILITY REVENUES 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 38.15 LIGHTING 00005134 141801 15049727 -00 5111.6406 31.79 LIGHTING 00005134 141874 15049727 -01 1646.6406 31.79 LIGHTING 00005134 141874 15049727 -01 5913.6406 31.79 LIGHTING 00005134 141874 15049727 -01 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUII " 81: 13:26:26 Page - 31 Business Unit CITY HALL GENERAL PARKING RAMP CENT SVC PW BUILDING POOL OPERATION POOL OPERATION 50TH STREET RUBBISH 50TH STREET RUBBISH POOL ADMINISTRATION TENNIS INSTRUCTION 394.90 142156 146679 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,038.95 142157 R55CKREG LUG20000 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING CITY L AA 146688 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 54920 142159 Council Check Register 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 8/10/2006 - 8/10 /2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 31.79 LIGHTING 00005134 141874 15049727 -01 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 399.12 LIGHTING 00005355 142233 15050932 -00 1375.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,244.00 LIGHTING 00005355 142233 15050932 -00 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,808.43 287574 8/10/2006 103410 W.W. GOETSCH ASSOCIATES INC. 539.99 RE- INSTALL POOL PUMP 141875 13871=425 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 539.99 - 287575 8110/2006 103466 WASTE MANAGEMENT - SAVAGE MN 489.60 ROLLOFF 141972 3668923 5311.6182 - RUBBISH REMOVAL 3,918.96 REFUSE 141973 3667956 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,115.71 REFUSE 141974 3661400 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7,524.27 287576 8/10/2006 120052 WEST COAST 1,889.00. LOCKERS 00007103 141802 00019748 5310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,889.00 287577 8/10/2006 120069 WHEELER, MEREDITH 52.06 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 142234 080406 1623.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 52.06 287578 8/10/2006 101033 WINE COMPANY THE 81: 13:26:26 Page - 31 Business Unit CITY HALL GENERAL PARKING RAMP CENT SVC PW BUILDING POOL OPERATION POOL OPERATION 50TH STREET RUBBISH 50TH STREET RUBBISH POOL ADMINISTRATION TENNIS INSTRUCTION 394.90 142156 146679 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,038.95 142157 146680-00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 131.50 142158 146688 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 54920 142159 146677 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,114.55 287579 8/10/2006 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 273.84 142160 164542 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,566.27 142161 164544 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 556.52 142162 164543 2,396.63 287580 8110/2006 112954 WISCONSIN TURF EQUIPMENT CORP. 144.39 CONVEYOR BELT 00006476 141933 527980 -000 144.39 287581 8/10/2006 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 694.50 142163 181870 5842.5513 5422.6530 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/9/2006 13:26:26 Council Check Register Page - 32 8/10/2006 — 8/10/2006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description _ Business Unit 272.66 142164 182040 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 486.00 142165 181988 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,453.16 287582 8110/2006 101726 XCEL ENERGY 144.13 51- 4156445-0 141803 77082783 5932.6185 LIGHT & POWER GENERAL STORM SEWER 698.70 51- 6137136 -8 141804 77113539 5430.6185 LIGHT & POWER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 5,040.08 51- 4827232 -6 141805 77082991 5311.6185 LIGHT & POWER POOL OPERATION 791.90 51- 6046826 -0 141806 77278588 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 80.04 51- 5634814 -2 - 141807 77269076 5933.6185 LIGHT & POWER PONDS & LAKES 159.25 51-6229265 -9 141808 77282483 1481.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK FIRE STATION 983.81 51 -0229265 -9 141808 77282483 1470.6185 LIGHT & POWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 377.81 51- 5938955 -6 141809 77276901 4086.6185 LIGHT & POWER AQUATIC WEEDS 2,659.92 51 -4159265 -8 141876 76889915 7411.6185 LIGHT & POWER PSTF OCCUPANCY 3,643.13 51- 6840050-6 141877 77298023 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER 4,969.75 51- 4966303 -6 141934 77591650 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 1,295.09 51- 5847121 -5 142235 77792876 5914.6185 LIGHT & POWER TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 44,820.68 51- 5605640 -1 142236 77774745 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 65,664.29 287583 8/10/2006 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 101.19 JULY USAGE 00009174 141935 018903785 5110.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 101.19 287584 8/10/2006 101091 ZIEGLER INC 345.00 GENERATOR MAINTENANCE 142237 E3809729 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 345.00 1,246,072.40 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 1,246,072.40 Total Payments 1,246,072.40 R55CKSUM L.- _0000 CITY O, A Council Check Summary 8/10/2006 - 811012006 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 333,406.46 02100 CDBG FUND 8,065.00 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 47,619.32 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 514,171.44 04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND 2,111.14 05100 ART CENTER FUND 24,738.34 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 14,820.91 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 12,366.36 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 427.79 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 1,596.94 05800 LIQUOR FUND 209,851.26 05900 UTILITY FUND 72,200.05 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 1,550.55 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 3,146.84 Report Totals 1,246,072.40 We 0"Ift) to the bew of our bWwbdW and belief, that "wee Hahne comply In all materm with the requirenw la of tits City of Edina purch"I ides end Procedures i a . f� G, 8/9, 13:28:16 Page - 1 MINUTES OF THE Edina Transportation Commission Thursday, June 15, 2006 Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Community Room MEMBERS PRESENT: Les Wanninger, Warren Plante, Marie Thorpe, Jean White, Geof Workinger, Dean Dovolis MEMBERS ABSENT: Joni Kelly Bennett, Marc Usem STAFF PRESENT: Steve Lillehaug, Sharon Allison I. Call to order The meeting was called to order by Plante. II. New Business a. West 70th Street (France Avenue to York Avenue) Traffic Study Lillehaug said the City initiated a traffic study at this location to analyze potential geometrics improvements, operational and access issues, and safety improvements in response to the recent West 70th Street area re- development applications received by the City. Three concept layouts (A, B and C) were developed by Chuck Rickart, Project Manager and Lynn Kiesow, Project Engineer, of WSB & Associates, Inc. Lillehaug said alternate C was developed after receiving feedback from the land and business owners. To'date, no negative feedback or objections have been received regarding alternate C. Staff is recommending approval of alternate C. The current layout is preliminary; a more detailed design will be done later. Plante asked what impact the plan for West 70th Street is going to have on the modeling that is planned for Southdale and the surrounding areas. Lillehaug said the modeling accounts for this plan and the modeling will grow on what was used by WSB and other traffic consultants. Rickart explained that there have been 29 crashes in the area over the last three years. He said four lane roadways without turn lanes tend to have more accidents. When a third lane is added for turning, crashes are reduced and a roundabout will decrease crashes even more because the left turn lanes are eliminated. He said the level of service on this type of road is based on delay — how long a driver sits at an intersection waiting to turn. Existing conditions shows the peak hour of 4:30 p.m. to be the worst and some access issue getting out of Target. Plante asked wi mi u tl ie accidei its occu, , ed, coi isidei ii ig that the, e are few entry/exits. Kiesow explained that most were rear -ended accidents which are common on roads without turn lanes. Workinger asked if they could get a layout of exactly where the accidents occurred to help them determine if a roundabout is actually safer than a four -lane roadway and also how many pedestrian accidents have occurred. Kiesow said there was one pedestrian accident. The accident locations could be provided at a later date. Alternate A includes left turn lanes at Target and the Galleria; bus pull out lane, sidewalks for pedestrians, and raised medians with landscaping; Alternate B includes a roundabout at Target and the Galleria entrance point and a second one at the west Galleria /Branden Square access point. The Galleria business representative did not like the second roundabout because vehicles backing out of parking spaces would block cars coming in from 70th. Alternate C has three roundabouts with no access into the Galleria on the west end. Rickart said roundabouts typically slow traffic, unlike stop signs where drivers tend to speed up when moving off, and they are also pedestrian friendly because pedestrians only cross one lane at a time. He said an overpass was considered for alternate A but.studies show that pedestrians tend not use overpasses. Some negative aspects of having three roundabouts are: not adequate room for bus pull outs; getting from France to York Avenue will be a little slower; and snowplowing will be slower and drivers will have to be trained on plowing around the roundabout. Semi - trucks will be able to navigate the roundabouts adequately. Lillehaug was asked what he liked about alternate C. He said they are eliminating a three - quarter intersection which is not usually the safest; the design works well with planned redevelopment; and it provides an opportunity for a crosswalk mid - block. Workinger said the roundabout slows traffic down, creates a safer environment and better access from north to south off of W. 70th. He does not believe it will help pedestrians, although the slower traffic should make it safer to cross W. 70th. To sum up the benefits that will be realized, Wanninger said it will be safer for pedestrians, greatly improved access from the businesses, slower moving traffic, and improved aesthetics. Dovolis said the green space in alternate C helps to soften the area and Thorpe said the sidewalks connect both sides together. The commissioners asked if there are roundabouts in the twin cities that they could look at. Lillehaug is going to put together a list of locations to send out via email. Thorpe motioned to accept staff's recommendation because alternate C will make it safer for pedestrians, greatly improved access from the businesses, slower moving traffic and improved aesthetic. Seconded by White. Plante asked if any consideration has been given for a roundabout at York. Lillehaug said no; it would be more significant because it would involve the county and has right of way implications. Ayes: 6 ( Wanninger, Plante, Workinger, Thorpe, White, Dovolis) Nayes: 0 Absent: 2 (Bennett, Usem) -Motion carried. 2 Wanninger congratulated Lillehaug for a job well done in introducing a new and different concept and explaining it in a way that they could understand. Lillehaug said the next step is to work out agreements with the county regarding turn lanes, prepare feasibility for the ETC and Council and get Mn /DOT's approval. He said a timeline has not been established yet, but they need to be mindful that the Westin Galleria and Target are modifying their plans to accommodate this project and they are planning on opening in approximately 2008 -2009. III. Handouts a. Upcoming Transportation Commissioner Calendar June 19 — Final SAC meeting to review the draft report and make recommendations to the ETC. This meeting is no longer the "Final" SAC meeting since Minneapolis will not hold their open house until June 27 relative to the NE traffic study. Wanninger suggested the following issues for discussion at the June 19 meeting: • Parking — he said they need to come to an agreement regarding parking so that it can be included in the report. • There are two categories of things to be done: 1) normal infrastructure replacement and Houle and Lillehaug can explain what these are and they will continue to handle these; and 2) traffic calming measures. He said #2 will most likely be controversial and should be separated from #1. • Assuming there is a recommendation to move forward, the process in the policy was designed to deal with an issue on a particular street. He suggested formulating a process that would have a more comprehensive approach. Plante asked if the Council will be allowed to push this off. Wanninger said they will have to point out to them that the issues have been around for a decade and that traffic consultants were hired to gather data and, while the solutions are not perfect, it is the best that can be done and they need to act on the ETC's recommendations. June 27 — City of Minneapolis' Open House sponsored by Councilmember Hodges. June 29 — Final SAC meeting, followed by a special ETC meeting. July 5 — Study presentation to Council. July — More to come on the West 70th Street Traffic Study; the consultant will be identified and project scope presented to the ETC. Plante said he is concerned about the lack of a long term vision that identifies what type of street West 70th is — residential, commercial, freeway, etc. Dovolis said there are two approaches and they are both policy questions that need answering. He said one approach is to preserve it as a residential street and the other is to make it a commercial connector. Plante suggested that the consultant be given a framework in which to work. Wanninger said consultants work best when they know the policy that they're working with. Approval of Minutes . a. May 15, 2006 The following corrections were made to the minutes: 3 p. 3, top line: 'keep faith,' not face; paragraph 2, delete "He suggested probably a website where they can list what they are working on" and replace it with He indicated that the city's website list projects being working on. p. 3, bottom line: "...more aesthetically pleasing and superior function." p. 4, paragraph 3, second -to -last and last full lines: change "somewhat" to potentially and "fix the problem" to widen the roadway. p. 5, Speed Limit Policy Motion: to clarify the motion made and voted upon, "Bennett moved that the ETC recommend that the City Council adopt changes to the City speed limit policy to permit reduction of speeds on residential street segments from 30 to 25 mph, on a case -by- case basis, in accordance with Minnesota law." p. 6, paragraph 3, under Open Discussion: change "taking out" to tearing down and insert "a number of homes and businesses." Plante motioned to approve the minutes with the corrections. Seconded by Dovolis. White and Thorpe abstained. V. Planning Commission Update (Commissioner Workinger) Reviewed and accepted a report from the Housing Task Force. There were no land use issues on the agenda. VI. Open Discussion Regarding bicycles on sidewalks, Lillehaug said MN statute allows bicycles on sidewalks, however, cities can restrict them in commercial areas but Edina has no restrictions. White said she attended the Southwest Transit Way PAC meeting and they are getting ready to start their "Vote Yes" campaign to get the state to dedicate all of the vehicles' sales tax to road and transit improvements. She said a southwest alternative route is being planned for September. VII. Adjournment Meeting adjourned. A special meeting is scheduled for June 29, 6:00 -8:00 p.m. in the Community Room, City Hall. The next regular meeting is scheduled for July 20, 6:00 -8:00 p.m. in the Community Room, City Hall. 4 rrrare MINUTES OF THE Special Meeting of the Edina Transportation Commission Thursday, June 29, 2006 Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Community Room MEMBERS PRESENT: Les Wanninger, Warren Plante, Marie Thorpe, Jean White, Geof Workinger, Joni Kelly Bennett MEMBERS ABSENT: Ellen Cerf, Marc Usem, Dean Dovolis STAFF PRESENT: Steve Lillehaug, Sharon Allison Bennett is concerned with some of the items listed under Findings and Recommendations because residents' expectations may be flawed based on the information that is provided. She is concerned that the Findings and Recommendations does not accurately reflect the problems as they exist and this leaves the door open for yet another study in the future. Lillehaug said he has received written comments from Bennett as well as other Commissioners but have not had a chance to meet with SRF to review the comments and incorporate them into the draft report. Wanninger suggested listing recommendations in relative priority order and include that they anticipate doing a Phase 2. Plante believe a Phase 2 may cause confusion. Instead of a Phase 2, Lillehaug said staffs recommendation would be to go into the NTMP program. Wanninger suggested adding a statement that staff will do an evaluation. The consensus is that staff will evaluate the effectiveness of implemented recommendations instead of conducting another study. Arterial improvements could begin as early as 2007 but this would be an aggressive schedule said Lillehaug, considering that approval is needed from Minneapolis; a more realistic schedule would be 2008. John Finlayson, a Minneapolis resident and SAC member said he has the full support of the 50th & France business district and is working to communicate to the Minneapolis Council that there is broad base neighborhood support. He does not want this to fall by the wayside because it is a good plan. Lillehaug said Edina can get started on neighborhood and some arterial implementations, but will need Minneapolis' approval before they can begin making parking changes to the east side of France at 44th. Wanninger suggested not waiting until Council has approved the plan to begin discussion with the businesses. Plante suggested including the timeline in the Executive Summary so that Council can be aware of the timeline. Lillehaug recommen a a if a Commissioners really believe in the - ier approach that they do not wait until TH -100 is completed for support because there are those who are waiting to see what changes will come about as a result of the changes on TH -100. Finlayson said the study has shown that 50th, France, and 440 has serious infrastructure flaws in and of themselves. In moving forward, Wanninger asked which part of the study might be controversial. White said not doing anything would be a detriment to the area; Bennett said cost to residents and Council will need to be clear to residents what residential improvements will cost and who will pay for them. Wanninger asked if there are certain improvements that the city should pay for. He said the ETC policy states that residents would be assessed. Lillehaug said funding will be difficult; probably not so difficult for the Country Club neighborhood because the area was already scheduled for reconstruction. Lillehaug said current policy is that all utility improvements are paid for from the utility funds for scheduled projects; everything else is paid for through assessments. Lillehaug was asked if there is a way to appropriate money in the budget for this type of project. He said yes, because the same was done for W. 70th Street and ETC advertising. Lillehaug asked that the ETC table funding discussion and allow staff to put together a cost estimate. The cost estimate will be ready for the July meeting. Wanninger is going to update the Council via email and he will emphasize to them that the recommendations is a package deal; he will also encourage them to start discussion with Council member Hodges. The following motion was put to the ETC for approval: "The Transportation Commission accepts the Final DRAFT NE Edina Transportation Study. The Commission formally requests the Council to direct the Commission to open a 30 -day public comment period regarding the Final DRAFT Report and the Commission to hold the Public Hearing upon the completion of the comment period. Upon completion of the Public Hearing, the Commission will formally make a recommendation to the Council for action." Workinger motioned to accept the recommended motion and seconded by White. Wanninger asked how they can conduct a public hearing without it getting out of control. Lillehaug said a public hearing is not required, but it will help the Council to make a better decision. He said it would be done in the same manner as the Planning Commission and would be videotaped. Other suggestions were to enforce time limit; individuals making comments out of order lose time to speak; everyone is allowed to only make three points; everyone speaks once and a second chance to speak would be allowed only after everyone has spoken; everyone notes name and address. Plante noted that there was a lack of participation at the two previous open houses. Bennett noted that the 4 p.m. time of the May Open House prevented many people from attending. Bennett said it is important to send out individually mailed notices announcing the public hearing. Lillehaug asked if the ETC would be willing to use some of their advertising funds to cover the cost of mailing and was told yes. FA FVAyes: Workinger, Plante, White, Wanninger, Bennett*, Thorpe" *Bennett voted for general approval with reservation based on interpretation of the data, specifically as it relates to the Findings and linking of support to the definition of problem because there was no definition of the problem. She said at the January open house people were not asked to define the problem, they were asked to state their ranking of the criticalness of the problem. "Thorpe voted for general approval and supports that the document is still a draft. She is concerned that there is not enough in the center of the neighborhood and she is hoping that the public hearing will actualize what should be done because she is not able to make the final decision. Nayes: 0 Absent: Cerf, Usem, Dovolis Meeting adjourned. K Page 1 of 2 Darlene Wallin From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 2:24 PM To: John Keprios; Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com Cc: Darlene Wallin Subject: FW: Proposed Nature Center Jennifer Bennerotte Communications & Marketing Director City of Edina 952 - 833 -9520 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 jennerotte @ci.edina.mn.us From: Liz Van Zomeren [mailto:evanzomeren @worldnet.att.net] Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 1:25 PM _Subject: Proposed Nature Center, August 2, 2006 TO: Mayor Hovland, Edina City Council Members, and Park Board Members I recently learned from the Edina Sun - Current's website that a Nature Center is proposed for Bredeson Park. While I believe the group proposing this center is well- intended, I do not believe that a Nature Center is needed. I believe that the City should focus on its core responsibilities -- police, fire, water, sewer, and streets. Even though the proponents have claimed that this center will be different, I do not believe that the location and local interest in significant enough to warrant the capital expenditures and ongoing operating budget. If Edina school children need to learn about nature, there are plenty of opportunities in the metro area that will meet their needs. I further do not believe that we need to use property taxes to build a site for birthday party rentals. That is not an appropriate use of resources. Not every well- intended, special interest in the City needs to have their wishes granted. A nature center is not needed. If it does come to fruition, the ongoing staff and resources will be a drain on resources needed for the city's core functions. If their is truly broader community support for this idea, then its supporters should raise private donations for its capital campaign and obtain grants for ongoing operating costs with the City providing the land. Thank you for your time and consideration. Yours Truly, Elizabeth Van Zomeren (18 year resident of Edina) 5029 Kent Avenue Edina, MN 55436 August 8, 2006 Chief Michael Siitari Edina Police Department 4801 West 50`h Street Edina MN 55424 Re: Edina Police Reserves Dear Chief Siitari: It is with pleasure that I enclose our check number 5115 in the amount of $1300.00_ as a donation to the Edina Police Reserves. Theses dedicated men and woman provided many hours of services to the businesses and patrons during the 40`h Annual Edina Art Fair. I especially would like to compliment Reserve Captain Browder Stone who spend many hours prior to the event working with myself and members of our staff in preparation for this event. He brought several years of history to our planning and without his help I am sure the safety and security portion of this project would not have been so smooth and painless. His sincerity and dedication were truly appreciated by all of us who spent many long hours during that weekend in June. Please commend all of the police reservists who participated in the Edina Art Fair — they were all professional and they are all appreciated! With warm regards, 50`h & France Business & Professional Association THE 40" ANNUAL EDINA ART FAIR Rosealee M. Lee, CAE Executive Director RML:cmt cc: City Manager Gordon Hughes Reserve Capt. Browder Stone Coil )01h & hrancc Btisirncss & Proicssloiial A.ssocialloti • P.O. B0,\ 24122 • Edina. \1\ :5.5=124 -0122 90-2 -921- 1:52=1 • Fax: 763-76,-.-)-2329 �����c.:i011�anclhr:uu cc c�aaa Page 1 of 1 Darlene Wallin From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 10:03 AM To: Alice Hulbert; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com cc: Darlene Wallin; Joyce Repya Subject: FW: James Hovland Jennifer Bennerotte Communications & Marketing Director City of Edina 952 - 833 -9520 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 jennerotte @ci.edina.mn.us From: Eric Fantin [mailto: Eric. Fantin @cfsmn.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 9:59 AM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: James Hovland Hello, I am a resident on the 60th to 61st block on Kellogg Ave (6033), after our block party yesterday and. in talking with a lot of neighbors, we have a lot of concerns that we would like to be addressed: after the House belonging to the Edina foundation was torn down on the block from 61st to Valley View, it becomes more apparent that the house next to it is in even worse than the destroy, I know that the house is in private hand and not occupied but something needs to be done it is an eyesore!!! and I cannot believe that the city would let a house deteriorate that much, I am aware that there are talk of development of that block, which brings me to a second point: we need to be informed on what are the possibility and goals of city for the area since it impact everybody in this area. we love this area very much and we have a pretty close knight neighborhood and we need answers. I know other people in our block have attempted to arrange an informal meeting and I add my voice to this request. we are looking at the future of this area and need to be informed in order to make correct decisions. I hope to here from you soon. thank you. 8/2/2006 7100�- ' I S—ic4 eo�� "� AC pr Cc.-' 1 l7t�- Xo-tk�( VI' M M M � � � e MINUTES OF THE RESCHEDULED MEETING OF THE EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD TUESDAY, JULY 12, 2006, AT 7:00 P.M. EDINA CITY HALL — COMMUNITY ROOM 4801 WEST 50TI STREET MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Bob Kojetin, Chris Rofidal, Lou Blemaster, Karen Ferrara, Arlene Forrest, Laura Benson, Nancy Scherer, and Ian Yue MEMBERS ABSENT: Marie Thorpe STAFF PRESENT: Joyce Repya, Associate Planner OTHERS PRESENT: Robert Vogel, Heritage Preservation Consultant Jane Lonnquist, 4510 Drexel Avenue Lisa Gervais, 4514 Drexel Avenue Susan Kliner, 4513 Drexel Avenue I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: Member Rofidal moved for approval of the minutes from the June 13, 2006 meeting. Member Ferrara seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. II. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS — Country Club District H -06 -3 4512 Drexel Avenue Demolish existing detached garage and incorporate an Attached garage with an addition to the home Planner Repya explained that the subject property is located on the west side of the 4500 block of Drexel Avenue. The existing home, constructed in 1925 is of the Mediterranean design style. The request for the Certificate of Appropriateness involves the demolition of an exiting 2 -stall detached garage located in the rear yard, 38 feet from the rear lot line, 5 feet from the south lot line, and accessed from a driveway running along the south property line. A new attached 3 -stall garage is proposed as part of an addition to the home. The existing driveway is proposed to continue providing access to the new attached garage. The original plan for remodeling the existing home resulted in a change in the architectural style from Mediterranean to what the owner described as English Minutes — July 12, 2006 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Cottage style; replacing the stucco exterior with cedar shake siding, a boulder stone base, added gables and an asphalt shingled roof. Ms. Repya pointed out that the owner of the property, Scott Busyn with Great Neighborhood Homes Inc. has done a considerable amount of communicating with the neighborhood regarding the proposed changes to the property. A photo rendering of the "finished product" home was installed in the front yard to communicate the changes proposed for the home. As a result of the photo, the City and Mr. Busyn received feedback from numerous neighbors on the block concerned that the new architectural style was not compatible with the homes in the neighborhood. After reviewing the original plans, City Staff and Heritage Preservation Consultant Robert Vogel determined that the remodeled home as shown would detract from the historical significance of the Country Club District as a cohesive heritage neighborhood. Furthermore, Mr. Vogel observed that he felt the proposed work would have a negative impact upon the historic integrity of the district. Mr. Busyn was informed that for the aforementioned reasons, staff would not recommend approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness request. On the date the staff reports were to be sent to the Board, Mr. Busyn, taking into consideration the neighborhood's, Staffs and Robert Vogel's concerns, submitted a revised plan for the subject property. In a letter to the Board, Mr. Busyn indicated that based on dialog with the 4500 block of Drexel, the exterior design of the home was revised to make it more traditional and appropriate for the neighborhood. He added that in creating the revised design they made every attempt to follow the guidelines set out in the Country Club District Plan of Treatment. Mr. Busyn also invited the 4500 block neighbors to view the revised plans prior to the HPB meeting to ensure that the neighbors knew that he was listening and taking their concerns into consideration. Addressing the revised plan, Consultant Vogel complimented Mr. Busyn upon his responsiveness and willingness to provide a plan that does a much better job of complimenting the historic character of the neighborhood. Furthermore, unlike the original plan, the revised plan would not detract from the historic value of the neighboring homes. Mr. Vogel added that he would recommend approval of the COA request subject to the revised plans dated July 7, 2006 with the requirement that a plaque with "2006" appear somewhere on the home to define it as a redesigned structure. Scott and Margaret Busyn of Great Neighborhood Homes, Inc. were present to address the revised plan. Mr. Busyn explained that the subject project at 4512 Drexel Avenue is being constructed as a speculative home. He pointed out that they have successfully purchased, upgraded and sold several homes in the Country Club District and received neighborhood praise for the finished products. Great Neighborhood Homes, Inc. pride themselves in addressing the contemporary 2 Minutes — July 12, 2006 Edina Heritage Preservation Board functionality of their homes while at the same time adhering to the Country Club District Plan of Treatment for the historic architectural styles. When asked why architectural style was changed from Mediterranean to English Cottage, Mr. Busyn explained that his research has proven that currently, the English Cottage style is much more marketable. Several Board members expressed concern that the architectural style of the home was being changed. Consultant Vogel reminded the Board that although the Heritage Preservation Board encourages consideration of the original architectural style of the home when contemplating alterations or changes, the Plan of Treatment does allow one to change the architectural style of the home as long as the new style is one of the traditional historic architectural styles found in the district. Discussion ensued regarding the original design of the Country Club District. Consultant Vogel observed that while buyers in the 1920's and 1930's had a choice of seven historic architectural styles to choose from, there was not a grand design to ensure that so many of each style was built on each street. In fact, the market at that time drove the makeup of architectural styles in the neighborhood. English Cottage is the most prevalent style found in the District, making up 32% of the homes, followed by 28% American Colonial Revival and 12% Mediterranean. Member Benson questioned why the Board was discussing the house when the requested COA is for the demolition of the detached garage. Consultant Vogel explained that while the City Council wanted to provide property owners a certain level of flexibility, the goal of the Plan of Treatment is to preserve the historic integrity of the neighborhood. If when reviewing a request for a COA it is determined that the results of the COA would create a structure that would be incompatible with the historic architectural styles in the neighborhood, it is the responsibility of the Board to address the incompatibilities. The following neighbors were present to address the revised request: Jane Lonnquist — 4510 Drexel Avenue — northerly neighbor Ms. Lonnquist thanked the Busyn's for their responsiveness to the neighbors concerns and commented that the revised plan was a vast improvement. Ms. Lonnquist stated that she wished the street facade of the home would have been maintained. She also questioned the front facing, 3 stall garage which she felt was too large for the neighborhood and inconsistent with layout of the historic homes in the neighborhood. 3 Minutes — July 12, 2006 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Lisa Gervais — 4514 Drexel Avenue — southerly neighbor Ms. Gervais expressed her appreciation to the HPB and the Busyn's for having an opportunity to weigh in on the proposed project. While Ms. Gervais agreed that the revised plan was a big improvement, she was concerned about the change in the architectural style. Specifically, she felt their block of Drexel Avenue was a more formal street where the neighbors have all worked very hard when making changes to their homes to maintain the original styles where the garages are not visible from the front street. Ms. Gervais added that she liked the requirement that a year built plaque be included in the plan; and wanted to bring to the attention of the Board that there are two healthy elms on the property which she would like assurance would be protected. Susan Kliner — 4513 Drexel Avenue — across the street Ms. Kliner thanked the Busyn's for listening to the concerns of the neighborhood and coming up with a plan that is a much better fit. Planner Repya observed that she received a phone call from Abbie Thiss, 4518 Drexel Avenue who was unable to attend the meeting, however wanted the Board to know that she and her husband were concerned that the original plan was not compatible with the homes in the neighborhood. She expressed her appreciation to the Busyn's for their desire to address the neighbors concerns with open communication. She added that both she and her husband supported the revised plan. Board members thanked the neighbors for coming to the meeting and sharing their concerns; stressing that it is important for the neighborhood to be a part of the process. Addressing the revised plan, Member Rofidal stated that he visited the property, and feels the revised plan is much improved; however struggles somewhat with the location of the attached garage which will be closer to the street than the existing detached garage. Mr. Busyn explained that because a 25 foot rear yard is required for attached garages, the design required the garage to be placed 5 feet closer to the street than the detached garage. Ms. Gervais, questioned the need for a third stall on the garage. She added that she would prefer the third stall be removed to reduce the length of the building abutting her property to the south. 4 Minutes — July 12, 2006 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Member Forrest observed that she understands the need for the third stall in this day and age. Most families utilize the third stall for storage of bikes, lawnmowers and . outdoor equipment which might otherwise be stored in the back yard. Member Scherer stated that she felt the revised plan was a vast improvement over the original plan. She pointed out that when she visited the site, she noticed that many of the surrounding homes have had large additions which have caused rather long building walls on those homes. It appears that when additions are added to these historic homes, longer building walls result. Ms. Scherer questioned the pergola shown on the second floor deck area. Mr. Busyn explained that usually pergolas are found on the first floor, as seen on the house to the south; however they are not uncommon in the District. Member Blemaster pointed out that as a realtor she sees the changes occurring in the District as a positive for preserving the livability of the homes as well as enhancing the desirability of the neighborhood. Member Ferrara explained that it is the obligation of the HPB to ensure that the plans approved with requests for Certificates of Appropriateness meet the Plan of Treatment established for the District. She added that the revised plan being considered appears to do just that. Mr. Busyn advised the Board that when working on homes in the Country Club District it is very important for his company to be considerate of the neighborhood. Perimeter fencing will be installed around the property; the sidewalks will remain open; and special attention will be given to protect the elms on the property. He added that adding a date plaque to the home can also be accomplished. Following a brief discussion, Member Blemaster moved approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness to demolish the existing detached garage and incorporate a new attached garage with an addition to the home subject to the revised plans presented dated July 7, 2006 and the condition that a date built plaque be installed on the building. Member Benson seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. III. FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS: Continued until the August 8t' meeting. IV. OTHER BUSINESS: A. 2006 State Historic Preservation Conference — Sept. 28 & 29 in Red Wing Chairman Kojetin reminded the Board that the State Historic Preservation Conference will be held on Thursday and Friday, September 28 and 29 in Red Wing, Minnesota. Because Edina is a Certified Local Government, we are required to send at least one Board member to at least one day of the conference. Kojetin pointed out that in the 5 Minutes — July 12, 2006 Edina Heritage Preservation Board past, members have attended that Friday sessions and found them very beneficial. Planner Repya provided Board members with the registration forms and explained that the City will pay the registration for those wishing to attend. The deadline for registrations will be August 16th, so a final count of those planning on attending will be taken at the August 8th HPB meeting. B. Paul Peterson House Tour — 5312 Interlachen Boulevard Planner Repya explained that a tour of the Peterson house has been scheduled for 6:00 p.m. on August 8th, just prior to the regular scheduled meeting on the same date. V. NEXT MEETING DATE: August 8, 2006 VI. ADJOURNMENT: 9:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Jaye. RePya. r August 11, 2006 City of Edina Ted and Lisa Thotland 6801 Creston Rd Edina, MN 55435 RE: Creston Hills Area Reconstruction City of Edina Contract No. ENG 06 -5 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Thotland: Thank you for meeting with me regarding the intersection of Creston Road and Balfanz Road on Monday, August 7 and for your letter dated August 7, 2006. As you indicated, you are unsatisfied with the approved plans for the Creston Road and Balfanz Road intersection. It is unfortunate that you were unaware of the approved plans for this project. Staff made reasonable attempts to provide information pertaining to the neighborhood's desires as well as neighborhood safety improvements early on in the design stages of this project. Specifically, we presented and discussed the intersection safety improvements at the March 1, 2006 Information Meeting held at Arneson Acres Park, at the Public Hearing held March 21, 2006 at City Hall as well as addressed it in the Feasibility Study that was approved at the Public Hearing - - and - posted -on -the- City's - website, which is still available on the website for viewing. All referenced documents and presentations included a discussion and. a specific intersection layout for Creston Road and Balfanz Road (see attached). In the future, staff will need to re- evaluate the effectiveness of this system to better inform the residents. Although you disagree with the intersection realignment, I assure you that the realignment is being done in good faith and with expertise to address several issues that staff is continually challenged with — providing safer, more typical intersections and to reduce impervious surface throughout the City. As I indicated to you when we met, our intentions were to make improvements to the low - volume intersection by providing an intersection that better defined driver's right -of -way. The existing intersection was a large intersection where vehicles could proceed through the intersection and /or "merge" at high speeds ( +/- 30 MPH) in several directions, leaving a large room for driver interpretation and error. The redesigned intersection provides for a more standard T- intersection with less pavement area, lessening the possibility for multi - directional traffic proceeding through the intersection at high speeds and drastically lessening the possibility for traffic to "merge" — merging shouldn't occur at this type of intersection. The new intersection better provides for and defines driver's right -of -way, basically eliminating the possibility for traffic to "merge" by making only subtle revisions within the boundaries of the existing pavement area (no further encroachment into boulevard areas providing more green space). Although the redesigned intersection isn't at the ideal 90 degree angle, it is not a design requirement. Typical engineering guidelines recommend no more than a 20 degree skew (from 90 degrees) — the new intersection falls well within this parameter. Although there wasn't an identified accident issue, it is good practice to provide a better design when situations allow that promote safer, calmer traffic operations. City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com 952- 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 Thotland Letter, Creston Hills Reconstruction Page 2 August 11, 2006 The City is also challenged with meeting the requirements of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Phase II permitting to reduce the City's impervious areas to the existing impervious conditions existing in 1988. In an effort to meet these requirements, staff is making attempts in the City's ,street reconstruction program to reduce pavement areas to help meet this goal. Reducing the street width as well as reasonably minimizing intersection areas that are grossly oversized are tools we use to help meet this mandated goal. Although you commented that our Construction Updates did not inform you of the revised intersection, they are not intended to provide information explaining the detailed plans. Rather, we use them to coordinate the project work with the neighborhood and to keep you informed of the progress of the project. The notifications that were intended to inform you of project design elements and impacts were the initial project information letters, information meeting invitations, and public hearing potices that were mailed directly to you — during the design stages of the project. As indicated earlier, we plan to evaluate and improve the techniques we used to inform the residents. Although the intersection does not currently meet warrants for a stop sign based on the conditions of the proposed intersection, upon project completion, the City's Traffic Safety Coordinator will fully review the intersection and evaluate if any further traffic control is warranted '(e.g. roadway curvature ahead sign, stop ahead sign, stop sign, yield sign, etc.). The proposed intersection is reflective of intersections throughout Edina that are effectively controlled in a number of different ways, dependent upon the different characteristics of the various intersections. Insightfully, the previous intersection, scenario existed with severe sightline restrictions for eastbound traffic, whir` warranted additional traffic control. It is my opinion that the approved plans promote a safer design than the existing and. lends for the opportunity to discreetly reduce the neighborhood's pavement area with very low impact to the surrounding properties. If you have any further comments or questions, please contact me. Thank you. Respectfully, . s�v P" Steve Lillehaug Assistant City Engineer C: Mayor James Hovland Scot Housh, Councilmember Alice Hulber, Councilmember Linda Masica, Councilmember Ann Swenson, Councilmember Gordon Hughes, City Manager Jerry Gilligan, City Attorney Mike Siitari, Police Chief Jeff Frahm, Project Inspector Boyd Tate, Traffic Safety Coordinator o e FEASIBILITY STUDY.— BA 332 0 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 'CITY OF EDINA STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CRESTON HILLS NEIGHBORHOOD MARCH .116,2006 LOCATION: The Creston Hills Neighborhood project includes Creston Road (West 701h Street to Balfanz Road), Wooddale Avenue (West 70th Street to Laguna Drive), Point Drive (north of Dunberry Lane), Oaklawn Avenue (Dunberry Lane to Point Drive), Dunberry Lane (West Shore Drive to Cornelia Drive), Judson Lane (Wooddale' Avenue to Point Drive), Balfanz Road (West Shore Drive. to Point Drive) and Laguna Drive (West Shore Drive to Wooddale Avenue). See Figure 1. n— % 4m ris .an Lbuft 4m M3 muwe q12 e am ffm GM3 m7 eras I �L7 ON w17 L_;M seas sow 3 i . - — !!I � am W3 ­_ - em we -12 -4 4Q4 Me $own m am.1aM 6B25 amm am so= w am GM 3 17 an am ow sm awr jj3o am. am ml ml am. am "41 am —1 am em a" am am@ eaot �V71 am 7-mT— em 1 : 44; F ` � , P ; L T st6if H111111w: Neighborhood '" , BA' 332 Figure 1. Project Area Map Feasibility Study Creston Hills Neighborhood Imp. No. BA -332 March 16, 2006 • The results do not corroborate an overwhelming indication f, preference of installing decorative street lighting — Staff does not recommend including decorative street lighting with this project since new lighting is not clearly supported by the property owners and a direct benefit to each property for this improvement is difficult to substantiate. • The majority of residents do not prefer constructing sidewalks in this neighborhood. Although staff typically recommends installing sidewalk along most residential streets to improve pedestrian safety, staff does not recommend constructing sidewalks in this neighborhood since sidewalks are not supported by the property owners and, if imposed, a direct benefit to each property for this improvement is difficult to substantiate. Staff recommends installing a barrier style curb and gutter as it will work well with the existing topography within this neighborhood (see Figure 2). A barrier style curb provides the best control of water runoff and better defines the roadway while providing protection to the sod and pavement edge from snowplow damage in the winter months. B618 C ❑NC CURB & GUTTER 6' Rl /2' R 3' MAT 3/8' R 3' 6' SLOPE 3/4' PER FT.'• BASE 7' : 7 112' ��, 8 �:­ ' * ' 8*1' Figure 2. Typical Barrier /Bulkhead Curb and Gutter The pavement throughout this neighborhood appears to be near the end of its useful life while the costs to maintain and repair the roadways are steadily increasing. Overlaying or seal coating the pavement in this neighborhood is not feasible. The proposed width for the roadways throughout the neighborhood is 28 -ft back -to -back of curb —the roadway will maintain the current 31 -ft width where existing curb is located (see Figure 3). Intersection geometrics are proposed to be revised to reduce the pavement area and improve safety by creating more standard T- intersections (see Figure 4). Trees will be protected and impacts to the trees will be minimized. Page 7 of 11 J Team Aw z ^ as d M •iw4 L k. 2-t ,.r•.• ,., .+, fit' r tr ,I �u.y.��[ ..tie..._ ■� !j S� ■+ rj•?.YEQv. Ar cw All • ss ��O's+.a'+�9. - � �! ,+ 7E'° a - .,y 4i i�i1 R [` 4• L7 t} � .� a: .r.SY �, t Sg f# 0a 'o k ' i .�7 '' -� t ad jw" AAA ■x'A` + �' L" h' Y' a wd F T av s Kos yr € Y� e _ i i _t ■ . + �.. xr, ...'ham +.t 'ff ay M '� � [ +.• _■ . '_k" as .4. a.a � Yom` � � ti -:. • is' am Flog- .�. Feasibility Study Creston Hills Neighborhood Imp. No. BA -332 March 16, 2006 ' Figure 4. Typical Intersection Layout Utility improvements include replacing the existing water services from the new watermain to the curb boxes (valves located at the property lines) and increasing the service size to 1 -inch; replacing hydrants with the City's new standard hydrant; installing a new portion of watermain along Wooddale Avenue between West 701h Street and Dunberry Lane; repairing the sanitary sewer where needed; revising the storm sewer to accommodate the new concrete curb and gutter and correct the existing storm sewer problems at certain locations within the neighborhood; and installing drain tile where needed to allow the property owners to connect their sump pump discharges directly into the storm sewer system. Other utility activities usually include replacement of gas mains within the neighborhood, which is determined and coordinated by the local gas utility company (CenterPoint Engergy). RIGHT -OF -WAY & EASEMENTS The right -of -way throughout the Creston Hills neighborhood is typically 60 feet wide. All proposed improvements stay within this right -of -way and no additional easement requirements are anticipated. PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $2,501,000 (see Table 3). The total cost includes indirect costs of 15% for engineering and clerical costs and 7.5% for first year finance costs. Funding for the entire project will be from combination of special assessment and utility funds. The estimated roadWL construction cost is $1,324,000 and will be funded using special Page 9 of 11 CITY OF EDINA r. Public Hearing INV Creston Hills Neighborhood �; Roadway Improvements Improvement No. BA-332 March 21, 2006 A, St 4 Proposed Typical T- Intersection Improvement No. BA -33" PU�JC, Ilvn(, ti-, Ija -(C k 2_I � cr,MD � �9^ w4r �4 k�.aa:.:a' qe �, � (.� �� •wF. j ``y�it� Fri }�' i y }•�s; ., ,•.+,. rll' sd7" �Sw* 1fi' Y � e N �•jj E a t t -- �� s t t^i•.i���j. a F? j�4�� 4�7. .K M a `r f rch 2 0,016.:,-: ' r; - \a5 �t � !. b tir t fir• ky��! -}' f� i'r���' �Yr M����} NON! or ....,�r� � d­- Neighb { i p •r X�Y� i � �1 }s t''tr a � h��a ��� �;. Y� •� 4 � 'XiG T�-3 fi� j� �rr" p t eY�y� t a � a3r '�Y`?+•9 I � Y jfL �,� SS �' y vG.t.a t nd"�a �` ? k;yad „Ir 0 0 Meefin pfc: F n H_ �• T i + is rn:r� t� rats. y r ¢ • ; x � ' 4 Ci 11 i'S4•{'r��FS �� t a:t�; - � - nr �' i ap b f{ f u a Lx X� t °p�li1 v� tai 1 1'�, Tki g s.. r , it y J ?' �. T t.z.�r.'w r Fj r"°` ti i° '63y� ���i�r • 44 }}�' Ne r h .. .. } '�trw' 'h ��„Fkl e r7{ y�Wij, Creston iHlls .. .•rp. -" ° 4'. e,,:.: N rF '+� i,.,:..a:x? ! ✓,-.e „+p'1 ,t . F •:.x . A. `%+�."l_.: s1( i t �5 i • �.. y�',y(�'_ }s�.t �•,, yp� - �rtggt kSG' � y U96'n �36J' �f4` Lioc, �9Ai6' �° J�0.�rr4YB`"`aG�il����� #�`j'a�X. a. , .. .. - .. ! ., ,. , k .�:.<• t i�t..:;a '" ., 5 r t td,r �. 4 i„ r.•,C �.. *,'1ro r .n'3hL- aS+.. • e +�"^r`. tr?� �.3 G�.�, ' d"!`'y� I e r CA, • r nt N o. BA - 332 Improvet -ne August 7, 2006 Mr. Steve Lillehaug Traffic Engineer /Assistant City Engineer Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: Creston Hills Area City of Edina Contract No. ENG 06-5 Dear Mayor Hovland, We are writing to you with grave concerns regarding the street and utility Improvement project in our neighborhood. We have met with Mr. Jeff Frahm, Project Inspector, Engineering Department and today with Mr. SteveLillehaug,'Traffic Engineer /Assistant City Engineer` but are not satisfied with the answers to our questions that either of them was able to provide to us. Stage 2 of the construction project was initiated on July 28 in our area and the existing road surfaces and portions of our driveway were removed. It wasn't until Tuesday, August 1 when the pink stakes were placed, that we became aware of how extreme these modifications to Balfanz and Creston Roads actually were. Mr. Jeff Frahm provided us with a site map of the intersection of Creston and Balfanz Roads on Thursday, August 3. His explanation as to why the Intersection of Balfanz Road and Creston Road required such extensive re- routing was that there is a requirement for all new Edina intersecting roadways to to be at 90- degrees as predicated by safety and traffic concerns. The site plan we received does not illustrate a 90- degree intersection. Merging traffic, per the site plan, will now occur in a decidedly smaller area that is immediately at the bottom of,our driveway -6801 Creston-Road. A review of the Construction Updates mailed to us by the City of Edina do not mention either the degree or the significance of the impact upon our particular partial of property. We feel that the street re- location and modifications adversely affects our property and therefore, our property value. This plan provides neither a safe nor an effective approach to handling the merging of traffic at this intersection. It Is difficult to see any positive solution being accomplished by this design. Sufficient city property presently exists north of the pond, between these two roads, to satisfy the radius requirements to accommodate a true -90 degree junction of Balfanz Road with Creston Road. There is also adequate space for a stop sign, which would benefit all residents of the immediate neighborhood, by slowing traffic while they attempt to back out of their respective driveways. Our primary concern in this matter is safety. The reduction in only the size of the Intersection without an actual 90- degree junction and the lack of a stop sign prior to entry from Balfanz on to Creston Road exacerbates the potential for property damage and personal injury. Further, no traffic survey was made (per Mr. Steve Lillehaug) prior to the design of this project. An arbitrary decision not to provide a stop sign suggests less than a conscientious or competent design. A true 90- degree junction occurs in this same neighborhood at the intersection of West Shore Drive and Lower Terrace. Three stop signs were installed at this intersection. In that only preliminary construction (i.e. road surface and rough grading) has been completed to date, there is adequate time to review this project and make the necessary plan changes. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Sin erely, -t Ted and Lisa Thotle 6801 Creston Road Edina, NIN 55435 952.928.038 -i cc: Mayor James Hovland Scot Housh, Council Member Alice Hulbert, Council Member Linda Masica, Council Member Ann Swenson, Council Member Jerry Gilligan, City Attorney Gordon Hughes, City Manager Craig Larsen, City Planner Mike Siitarl, Police Chief Jeff Frahm, Project Inspector, Engineering Department Wayne Houle, Public Works Director /City Engineer Boyd Tate, Traffic safety Coordinator RANSPORTATION TH ALLIANCE . ftbw*�� Alliance Legislative Update August 11, 2006 Sign Up for the State Fair! Help Spread the Word at the Great Minnesota Get Together We have one of the best opportunities yet to reach many voters about the need for the Transportation Amendment to pass in November. We will have a VOTE YES presence at the fair at a transportation themed booth. Please sign up to help staff this booth. We need folks to spend just a few hours at the booth talking to people about transportation and the Transportation Amendment. Free admission to the State Fair is provided so after your shift you can enjoy the rest of the fair. Please call or e- mail: Margaretna ,transportationalliance.com , 651- 659 -0804 to get on the schedule and help make a difference in the future of transportation. Here are the shifts: Thursday, Aug. 24`t' 9am -lpm 1pm -5pm 5pm -9pm Friday, Aug. 25`h 9am -lpm 1pm -5pm 5pm -9pm Saturday, Aug. 261h 9am -lpm 1pm -5pm 5pm -9pm Sunday, Aug. 27`h 9am -lpm 1pm -5pm 5pm -9pm Monday, Aug 28`h 9am -lpm 1pm -5pm 5pm -9pm Tuesday, Aug. 29`h 9am -lpm 1pm -5pm 5pm -9pm Wednesday, Aug. 30`h 9am -lpm 1pm -5pm 5pm -9pm Thursday, Aug. 315` 9am -lpm 1pm -5pm 5pm -9pm Friday, Sept. Is` 9am -lpm 1pm -5pm 5pm -9pm ;aturday, Sept. 2nd 9am -lpm 1pm -5pm 5pm -9pm Sunday, Sept. 3rd 9am -lpm 1pm -5pm 5pm -9pm Monday, Sept. 4`h 9am -lpm 1pm -5pm 5pm -9pm It will take a big crew of folks to staff the booth, so please do your part. MBRT Launches Huge VOTE YES Sign Campaign Minnesotans for Better Roads and Transit is setting out to implement the most aggressive visibility campaign in state history, with the goal of placing more than 20,000 signs in every corner of the state. The lawn sign campaign is a key field effort. Placing thousands of signs throughout the state is a critical part of MBRT's efforts to elevate the VOTE YES brand visibility with voters in their neighborhoods, along their commuting routes, in bus windows and in key thoroughfares throughout the state — generating more interest in the issue. This is MBRT's opportunity to raise visibility, build energy and generate excitement in the effort to reach the goal of 1.4 million voters ready to VOTE YES when they walk into the ballot box on November 7. We're ready to get the sign campaign rolling! There's no question that 20,000 signs is an ambitious goal but it's also one of the main things we are asking coalition partners to do this campaign. With more than 850 organizations involved with MBRT we know we can get it done — but we need your help! We are asking you to commit to distributing and/or posting 100 or more signs (depending on your membership /employee base). We welcome larger requests and are happy to receive all requests. We will be identifying distribution sites throughout the state so you will be able to drive to a location near you to get your signs. We will have smaller lawn and window signs and larger signs for placement along highways. If your irganization can serve as a distribution location, or you know of good sign locations in your area, please call Margaret at the Alliance: 651- 659 -0804 or e-mail: Mar ag ret@transportationalliance.com Ordering Signs Signs will be ready to go out to coalition members and individuals next week. If you are interested in obtaining VOTE YES lawn signs, window signs and/or bumper stickers, contact Eric Bergstrom at Grassroots Solutions at eric(&grassrootssolutions.com or 612 - 865 -4566. You can also fill out an online form for materials here: httl2://www.voteyesmn.org/Isbs.html Remember — implementing the largest campaign in state history is one of the 3 key elements of MBRT's grassroots campaign. Help make sure we succeed! Minnesota Transportation Alliance/HCIC to Host Candidate Forums It's another, important election year and the Alliance and HCIC are teaming up once again to engage legislative candidates in a discussion of how to address transportation needs and funding. We will be hosting a series of candidate forums around the state and have invited all 500 candidates to choose a forum to attend. A big part of what makes these events successful is having a room full of local constituents. Please mark your calendar for one or more of these candidate forums so we can make sure our future legislators understand how important transportation is among all the issues they will confront. All meetings are scheduled from 11:30 AM —1:30 PM Cost: $25.00, includes buffet luncheon and meeting costs for each meeting (we're working on scheduling a meeting in Bemidji) Thursday, September 7 Mankato Holiday Inn 101 E. Main St., Downtown Mankato, MN 56001 Phone: 507/345 -1234 Thursday, September 14 Blaine Blainebrook Entertainment Center Brookhall 12000 Central Ave. NE, Blaine, MN Phone: 763/755 -8131 Monday, September 18 Rochester Ramada Hotel & Conference Center . 1517 16s' St. SW, Rochester, MN 55902 Phone: 507/289 -8866 Tuesday, September 19 Austin Holiday Inn 17014' St. NW, Austin, MN 55912 Phone: 507/433 -1000 Wednesday, September 20 Woodbury Country Inn by Carlson, St. Paul East 6003 Hudson Road, Woodbury, MN 55125 Phone: 651n39-7300 Thursday, September 21 White Bear Lake Best Western Country Inn 4940 N. Highway 61, White Bear Lake, MN 55110 Phone: 651/429 -5393 Thursday, October 12 Burnsville Holiday Inn 14201 Nicollet Ave. S., Burnsville, MN 55337 Phone: 952/435 -2100 Wednesday, October 18 Alexandria Holiday Inn 5637 Highway 29 S., Alexandria, MN 56308 Phone: 320/763 -6577 Thursday, October 19 St. Cloud Best Wester Kelly Inn 100 4'h Ave. S., St. Cloud, MN 56301 Phone: 320/253 -0606 Tuesday, October 24 Duluth Holiday Inn & Suites 200 W. 1st Street, Duluth, MN 55802 Phone: 218/722 -1202 A. i MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Massing Task Force Committee and City Council FROM: Kris Aaker, Assistant Planner RE: Massing Task Force /City Council Workshop Meeting DATE: August 4, 2006 The Planning Department has scheduled a workshop session of the Massing Task Force Committee with Edina City Council to present the findings and recommendations of the Task Force. The date for this meeting is Tuesday, August 15, 2006 at 5:00 PM, Community Room, (second floor), City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street. Enclosed you will find the following: Agenda Final Report of the Massing Task Force Committee Please feel free to contact me if you have further questions at (952)826 -0461. Thanks. i 1 '09 �I t� VCORPORP -t�- �ses EDINA CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATION Overview — D. Maetzold • Mission • Membership . 'Process Teardown Phenomenon — Hay Dobbs Nationwide Approaches — Hay Dobbs e General e Case Studies (brief summaries) Edina's Historic Periods & Change — Hay Dobbs Findings — D. Maetzold Recommendations — D. Maetzold Discussion www.Ietsplayhockey.com $2 July 13, 2006 Pros pack 4 -on -4 League Its second year, West St. Paul no checking league attracts throngs of state's top talent Never in its history has Minnesota had a summer hockey league like the 4 -on -4 No Checking League at West St. Paul Arena. The duo of Ray Fuerst and Scott Steffen continues to bring in talented players. This year, the league has added Brent Burns (Min- nesota Wild), Shane Joseph (San Jose Sharks), Tim Conboy (San Jose Sharks), Tim Hambly (Calgary Flames) and several other AHL, European and ECHL players. Add returning NHL players Ryan Malone (Pittsburgh Penguins), Duvie Wescott (Co- lumbus Blue Jackets), Joe Motzko (Colum- Con tin ued on page 10 Photo by Brent Knoke /creditriverphoto.com Bemidji native Joe Motzko, property of the Columbus Blue Jackets, is one of dozens of pro players in the Minnesota 4 -on -4 No Checking League in West St. Paul. I Volume XXXIV Number 29 Issue 897 Boe#m' R91S St. Paul dota [L FA11 CLEAN 2t�rt AGAIN SPORCLEAN IN ENT Bicycles r` Fitness Y" Hockey Courtesy of Minnesota Made Hockey (Left to right) Peter Mueller, Jamie McBain and Mike Carman — all members of the Minnesota 88s as kids — reunited after being drafted in Vancouver. NHL Draft Class of 2006.... Ina storybook scenario, seven members of the Minnesota 88sAAA team weredrafted By Dave McMahon Let's Play Hockey Editor Kyle Okposo ran on his skates, but in speedball, he was a better athlete than anyone. In the same game of speedball, Erik Johnson knew how to use his frame, even back then as a 9 -year -old. You couldn't find a faster player on a speedball field than Mike Carman. - Speedball? Yep, a modified game of soccer is at the root of one of the most thoroughly 7. Kyle Okposo, impressive hockey accomplishments 8. Peter Mueller, PHO ever. At the 2006 NHL Entry Draft in 63, Jamie McBain, CAR Vancouver, an offseason AAA team 81. Mike Carman. COL called the from the Twin Cities called "- 1 r C' the Minnesota 88s had seven players 176 . Ryan Flynn. NIAS from its team selected. That's right, seven players from one team. No. 1 draft pick Erik Johnson of Bloomington, No. 7 Kyle Okposo of St. Paul, No. 8 Peter Mueller of Bloomington, No. 63 Jamie McBain of Faribault, Continued on page 54 ( ourtesy of Minnesota Made Hockey As 12- year -olds, the Minnesota 88s enjoyed a break from a game of pond hockey in Apple Valley. (Front row, left) Trent Palm (UMD), Alex Stuart (Sioux City), Derek McCallum (UM baseball), Ricky Booker, Michael Carman (UM) and Matt Erickson. (Back) Kyle Okposo (UM), Erik Johnson (UM), Ryan Flynn (UM), Jamie McBain (Wisconsin), Peter Mueller (WHL) and Tony Mosey. ��KeY l I Limited Edition Buhh1chead wvii nA M'Io111Ie&OT."M 54 July 13, 2006 Hockey LETS PLAY HOCKEY ♦ www.letsplayhockey.com �i NonesotamBred Players in 2006 NHL Entry Draft I No. Team Name Hometown Last team Pos. 1 St. Louis Erik Johnson Bloomington U.S. NTDP U -18 D 7 N.Y. Islanders Kyle Okposo St. Paul Des Moines (USHL) RW 8 Phoenix Peter Mueller Bloomington Everett (WHL) C 20 Montreal David Fischer Apple Valley Apple Valley H.S. (MSHSL) D 32 Pittsburgh Carl Sneep Brainerd Brainerd H.S. (MSHSL) D 63 Carolina Jamie McBain Faribault ' U.S. NTDP U -18 D 80 Atlanta Michael Forney Thief River Falls Thief River Falls H.S. (MSHSL) LW 81 Colorado Mike Carman Apple Valley U.S. NTDP U -18 C 89 Calgary Aaron Marvin Warroad Warroad H.S. (MSHSL) CNV 102 Minnesota Kyle Medvec Apple Valley Apple Valley H.S. (MSHSL) D 124 St. Louis Andy Sakdson St. Louis Park St. Louis Park H.S. (MSHSL) C/LW 135 Atlanta Alex Kangas Rochester Sioux Falls (USHL) RW 176 Nashville Ryan Flynn Lino Lakes U.S. NTDP U -18 RW Minnesota 88s continued from page 1 No. 81 Mike Carman of Apple Valley, No. 166 Tyler Ruegsegger and No. 176 Ryan Flynn of Lino Lakes all were members of the Minnesota 88s (their birthyear). "I don't know what's more incredible, that Benue McBain created, developed and trained this group into the players they became, or that he was able to spot that talent at age 8 or 9 and develop it," said Mike Palm, whose son Trent was a member of the team and will play at Minne- sota Duluth. "Are you telling me that this person Bernie had the hockey genius to select seven NHL draft picks and 10 DI players when they were 8 or 9 years old ?!" Whichever way you slice it, it's truly an incred- ible feat. The performances are mind - numbing. In 2003, Minnesota Hockey's Select 15 National Roster had 22 players. Twelve of them were from the Minnesota 88s. The next year on the Select 16 National Roster, 11 of the 22 Minnesota Hockey players were from the Minnesota 88s. In 2004, nine members of the 88s were invited to Ann Arbor, Mich., for the U.S. National Team Development Program Evaluation Camp. Last year, 10 of the 22 Minnesota Hockey players on the Select 17 National Roster were from the Minnesota 88s. Evaluation? There's more of that coming. In fact, McBain, the 42 -year-old father who is the roots behind the flourishing talent, will meet with USA Hockey officials later this summer to dis- cuss his training techniques and'philosophies as the group attempts replication. He'll probably have a soccer ball in his equipment bag. That's what he used back when he had tryouts for the group of 9 -year-olds, most of whom stayed with the 88s for the next seven years. The group had spent a year with the Minnesota Blades with McBain on the coaching staff, then broke off to form the 88s, where McBain ran the show. "We networked, and found about 30 kids we invited to a weeklong clinic," said McBain, whose son Jamie was one of them. "It was the year be- fore they became Squirts, probably 8 or soon -to- be 9 -year-olds. We had some icetime and after that we had a modified soccer game called speedball. 101 CIDT181MILRO51 11till pfflSents VOUTH NOCKRY TOURNIVS 2007 Sauk Centre Civic Arena Bantam B January 13 -14 PeeWee B1 January 27 -28 Squirt B February 3 -4 Entry Fees Only $300.00 3 Game Guarantee Register online at w_ymm.pgcomp.com /hockey Contact . Rob Mettenburg (320) 351 -5125 or (320) 293 -2636 themettenburgs @mainstreetcom.com It's like soccer, but you're able to use your hands and feet. So if you're tagged while you're carrying the ball, you have to turn it over to the other team. We used that game to judge the kids' athleticism. The whole idea is you have to teach kids to skate before they can play the game at all. In speedball, they already know how to run and jump. Some kids at that age might be great skaters because their dads got them 200 hours of ice by then. In speedball, we see who's the fastest, who can change direction, whose got the mind for the game, who can pick it up quickly." With the 88s moving upward in the hockey hierarchy, McBain has formed two more teams in the past two summers. The Minnesota Machine 1996 -born and 1997 -born teams were picked us- ing the same speedball criteria. "More weight was put on how they did in the speedball game than how they skated," he said. "We can get them the ice time to develop if they start with good athletic potential, and try and work the fine motor skills and muscle memory, espe- cially the hand skills, the sickhandling and pass- ing. We took the attitude that hand skills are more important than skating skills. You. can be the best skater in the world, but not make it to your advan- tage if you don't have the hand skills. But if you're an average skater with excellent hand skills, you can generate enough time and space to play with anyone. It's like in the land of the blind, the one- eyed man is king." The 88s•used a practice -to -game ratio of about 10 to 1. "We didn't play in any leagues," said McBain, who is joined on the staff by assistant coaches Tom Carman, Ron Erickson and Todd Blackstone. "Tournaments only; no leagues. We would skate about 160 hours a summer starting in March, tak- ing July off, and then go through Oct. 1. We would practice anywhere from two to three hours. We threw away any kind of system play. There were no breakouts or forechecks. We would break the icetime down into thirds: skating, stick - handling and passing." The group remained together for a seven -year run, when the bulk of them turned heads at the Select 16 National Festival. Seven of them want on to play fall -time with the U.S. National Team Development Program in Ann Arbor, Mich. Remember, McBain spotted them as athletes. Alas, players like Derek McCallum (baseball at Minnesota) and Robert Tennyson (football at Harvard) have taken on new endeavors. The team roster has included Okposo, Johnson, Flynn, L_ - McBain, Mueller, Tony Mosey, Palm, Alex Stuart, McCallum, Ricky Booker, Carman, Matt Erickson, Ruegsegger, Brett Peterson, Andy Inderiden, Taylor Matson and Tennyson. More prospects are on the way. "The 96 Machine is better than the 88s were at this time. They haven't lost a game in U.S. or Canada. I think they're something like 54 -0," McBain said. McBain watched Mueller's leadership skills develop as a Bantam. "He eventually became that, but at first he was not the best player on the team," McBain said. "Palm was an average player that we thought had good athletic ability. He was a late bloomer. He was a B player as a first -year Squirt and as a first -year Peewe. He came into his own as a Ban- tam, made it to Shattuck then went to the USA program. Erik Johnson was a B player when he was a fast -year Squirt. He's another guy who was not very skilled. He did have good athletic ability and tremendous size, then he grew and matured and gained a strong work ethic. He and Kyle spent a lot of time working on the hand skills. "All of them would do a lot of off -ice stickhandling and shooting, getting up four or five days a week before school and work in the garage and basement. We would base who was captain at tournaments on how much they did at home. The ones who did the most off -ice training and took it to heart are the ones that end up getting drafted. The majority was stickhandling exercises, wrist - rolling, cupping the puck, stickhandling around obstacles. We'd give them a sheet of paper with seven or eight drills on it. Six of them would be stickhandling drills and the other two would be shooting drills." McBain couldn't tell you how many goals his players have scored over the years. Now passes, he could talk about for weeks. "We don't keep track of goals," he said. "The only stat we've ever kept is pass count: how many successful passes are executed each period. The 88s are their peak would have 80 to 100 success- ful passes per period. That's how we judge how they're doing in the game. We have someone in the stands tracking every game, the entire game. If + you control the puck, goals are a byproduct. Shifts are never longer than 30-45 seconds and we do wholesale line changes. That's the only time we dump the puck. It wears he other team wears out and the floodgates open." It's a dominance that was parlayed into one of ° G the best success stories a team could imagine. Somerset Youth Hockey 2006 - 2007 Hockey Tournaments LOCATION Somerset Youth Civic Center 529 Main St Somerset, WI 54025 Nov 10,11,12 Dec 1, 23 3 Peewee Div 1A/2A Squirt Div 2A/3A & Div C (2B) $375 $350 Nov 10,11,12 Dec 9, 10 Bantam Div 2A/3A Mite A/B $400 $300 Feb 3 March 9. 109 11 Atom Jamboree Senior Men's No Check $10 per player /' For more information: Contact Steve Hartke • 715- 247 -5296 or hartke @somersethockey.com Tun CITY OF EDINA 4 9ional Canadian Pacific Trail �,� Ring Study ►I�.gLl0�s r • . "When residents and historians look`back at this period in;the Twin_Cities,. they.will Dearly identify it as;tFe great era of bicycle, trail = construction: ' We are in 66 midst, ;of creating an essential new th ;element in e'.: transportation and recreation systems 6' f the 21stc6ntury. Bicycles may have been invented ;in the 19th'century, but they are . becoming even more importanUn the 21st" Hennepin County Commissioner Peter McLaughlin October 31, 2001 Invitation Letter to Bicycle Gaps Meeting CITY OF EDINA "ared for..the .Edina City Council anted by Planning Staff ernbeirKci Kublcek Benefits of Trails • Encourage Physical Activity in Residents Alternative to Automobile,dominated transportation system J,i Intent for the RCPT • The trail will run along the CP Rail line and create a corridor of movement within Edina Link Edina to the surrounding cities including Minneapolis Overall the trail will create additional recreation and transportation opportunities f_ Opportunities k u •. Edina is lacking .Regional Trails •:;Provides Alternative Transportation •;Safe =means of,travel .:Means of connection to residential `, ;areas; s ch' oolsir.qoarks and trails' • ,Trail passei,fibar both low ar tl high' density' residential areas RCPT Trail and Connections -The majority of the RCPT (4.1 miles) is contained in Edina -The Northern Portion of the Trail is in St Louis Park -The Southern Portion is in Bloomington Constraints . • Right of way, being actively used as.a rail line;' • Portions;:of thb.trail encounter narrow rghts "I way � f. • Pordons'�of Trail encounter, areas of fully',- `developed residential areas`some.of which ,include prvate-improvements such as fences and landscaping' in the right of way; • ; Community is: 1. built out RCPT Trail and Connections St Louis Park k tEdina t 1 4 f S:. .;f 1 5 4' ` Fr. x' , > r: t' T _ Connection to the First Tier Trail Y. 7. r r A Future Connections 4 y •Y Al Future Connection will be tFe Fir§t .'Tier, Tail/ which is being planned by t '` ahe Tl'ree Rivers Park Distnct F __(formerly Hennepin County Park District) ,; R,;t E 1 t a' rr ;,1_ Trail Concept Plan ^ ' • Design Elements — Minimum 15 ft setback from Rails ......... iba R.T.. ,; .., '. —The Trail will be 10 -12`1 minimum The design includes two bikes lanes and y ;? shared pedestrian access 3 - Ji � � 1 C3 r.,....� �... a q cr t .. 4 Bi1iGSwiek ' f � . r '��an.F..►.+.++ ®,a,s,�, �� h Ave y' BI t k 781hSt_ ^ �' 1 100 r ol s r 1 -RCPT r 1•. , f ', ., _ �V�,.- tVam.m.k Connection to the First Tier Trail Y. 7. r r A Future Connections 4 y •Y Al Future Connection will be tFe Fir§t .'Tier, Tail/ which is being planned by t '` ahe Tl'ree Rivers Park Distnct F __(formerly Hennepin County Park District) ,; R,;t E 1 t a' rr ;,1_ Trail Concept Plan ^ ' • Design Elements — Minimum 15 ft setback from Rails ......... iba R.T.. ,; .., '. —The Trail will be 10 -12`1 minimum The design includes two bikes lanes and y ;? shared pedestrian access 3 - , r z a q cr t s •� y' BI t k 781hSt_ ^ �' 1 Connection to the First Tier Trail Y. 7. r r A Future Connections 4 y •Y Al Future Connection will be tFe Fir§t .'Tier, Tail/ which is being planned by t '` ahe Tl'ree Rivers Park Distnct F __(formerly Hennepin County Park District) ,; R,;t E 1 t a' rr ;,1_ Trail Concept Plan ^ ' • Design Elements — Minimum 15 ft setback from Rails ......... iba R.T.. ,; .., '. —The Trail will be 10 -12`1 minimum The design includes two bikes lanes and y ;? shared pedestrian access 3 - , a q 1 t •� k 781hSt_ ^ �' 1 100 r 1•. , f ', ., _ �V�,.- tVam.m.k Connection to the First Tier Trail Y. 7. r r A Future Connections 4 y •Y Al Future Connection will be tFe Fir§t .'Tier, Tail/ which is being planned by t '` ahe Tl'ree Rivers Park Distnct F __(formerly Hennepin County Park District) ,; R,;t E 1 t a' rr ;,1_ Trail Concept Plan ^ ' • Design Elements — Minimum 15 ft setback from Rails ......... iba R.T.. ,; .., '. —The Trail will be 10 -12`1 minimum The design includes two bikes lanes and y ;? shared pedestrian access 3 - , Next Steps • Initiate Further contact with CP Rail by sending Report and doing follow up work • Forward Report to Bikeway Task Force CITY OF EDINA Questions ?,i Comments? b3id ti Steps Completed to Date • Initial data collected and study completed and documented • -Initial communication with CP Rail made and stipulations for trail received • Held meetings with both St Louis Park and Bloomington to confirm willingness to connect trails CITY OF EDINA egional Canadian s 7 Pacific Trail ;;, �+p f Planning Study August -2006 �� %r,�� -�- .ass`: --' r4, � •1 .- �j I., ry I u Steps Completed to Date • Initial data collected and study completed and documented • -Initial communication with CP Rail made and stipulations for trail received • Held meetings with both St Louis Park and Bloomington to confirm willingness to connect trails CITY OF EDINA egional Canadian s 7 Pacific Trail ;;, �+p f Planning Study August -2006 �� %r,�� -�- .ass`: --' r4, � •1 .- �j I., ry