Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2020_7_14_MeetingAgenda Heritage Preservation Commission City Of Edina, Minnesota Virtual Meeting Members of the public can listen to the HPC meeting by calling 833-360-0793 with Conference ID 9185293 to listen during the meeting. Tuesday, July 14, 2020 7:00 PM I.Call To Order II.Roll Call III.Approval Of Meeting Agenda IV.Approval Of Meeting Minutes A.Minutes: June 9, 2020 V.Reports/Recommendations A.COA: 4634 Edgebrook Place B.2021 Work Plan Discussion VI.Chair And Member Comments VII.Sta0 Comments VIII.Adjournment The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing ampli4cation, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Date: July 14, 2020 Agenda Item #: IV.A. To:Heritage Preservation Commission Item Type: Minutes From:Emily Bodeker, Assistant City Planner Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: June 9, 2020 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the June 9, 2020 Heritage Preservation Commission minutes. INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Minutes: June 9, 2020 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Minutes City of Edina, Minnesota Heritage Preservation Commission VIRTUAL MEETING Tuesday, June 9, 2020 I. Call To Order Chair Schilling called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering roll call were members Lonnquist, Pollock, Cundy, Birdman, Widmoyer, Everson, Hassenstab, Chair Schilling and student member Maheshwari. Emily Bodeker, staff liaison, and Robert Vogel, Preservation Consultant, were also in attendance. Commissioner Nymo joined the meeting at 7:05 pm. III. Approval of Meeting Agenda Motion made by Birdman seconded by Hassenstab to approve the meeting agenda as submitted. All voted aye. The motion carried. IV. Approval of Meeting Minutes Motion made by Lonnquist seconded by Widmoyer to approve the meeting minutes from the virtual May 12, 2020 meeting. All voted aye. The motion carried. V. Reports/Recommendations A. COA: 4521 Arden Avenue Liaison Bodeker presented the Certificate of Appropriateness request for a new detached garage at 4521 Arden Avenue. The property owners, Jeff and Susan Lundgren and architect Meriwether Felt were in attendance to answer any questions. Motion by Cundy seconded by Birdman to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for a new detached garage at 4521 Arden Avenue with the following conditions: • The maximum height for the garage is 18’ and is measured from average existing grade. • A landscaping element or other element such as a garden trellis, lattice, brackets, window, etc. is required on the east elevation to break up the building wall. • Any changes to the proposed plans would require review from the Heritage Preservation Commission. • A date-built plaque is required to be installed on the new garage Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: All voted aye. The motion carried. B. COA: 4634 Edgebrook Place Staff Liaison Bodeker introduced the Certificate of Appropriateness request for a new home at 4634 Edgebrook Place. TJ Madecki, from Murphy Design Co. and Nate Wissink from Streeter homes were present on the webex to answer questions on the requested COA. Bodeker explained that obtaining a COA for new homes in the Country Club District is a two-step process. The plans presented fulfill the first step. Staff recommended that the HPC provide the applicant feedback on the proposed plans and identify any desired changes. Overall, the commission asked the applicant to review the scale and massing of the proposed garage. They asked the applicant to look at the spacing, ceiling height, breezeway size could be modified to address concerns with massing and height. The Commission also asked the applicant to provide a second rendering showing a second perspective from the street. They felt this would help with understanding how the proposed house would be viewed from the street. C. 2020 Work Plan No update D. Biographical Sketch S.S. Thorpe Consultant Vogel submitted a biographical sketch of S.S. Thorpe for the review by the Heritage Preservation Commission. The Commission received correspondence with suggested changes to the proposed document. Staff recommended that the Commission direct Consultant Vogel to review the submitted correspondence and make proposed changes. Once staff has an updated draft, they will submit it to the City’s Race and Equity Coordinator, Heidi Lee, for review before it comes back to the Heritage Preservation Commission. Motion made by Cundy seconded by Birdman to direct Consultant Vogel to review correspondence and make any appropriate edits and ask the City’s Race and Equity Coordinator to review the document before it comes back to the HPC at a future meeting. All voted aye. The motion carried. VI. Chair and Member Comments: A. Garden Arch Commissioner Lonnquist reached out to staff after a resident of the Country Club District asked her about the removal of a garden arch on at a property on Arden Avenue. Staff responded to Lonnquist explaining that she had been contacted by the property owner in 2017. Staff and Consultant Vogel agreed that a COA for the removal was not required due to the fact that the Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: garden arch was not original to the house. Commissioner Lonnquist wanted to communicate this with the Commission in case anyone else received any questions. VII. Staff Comments: Liaison Bodeker reminded the Commission that the next meeting is scheduled for July 14th. She mentioned it will likely be another virtual meeting. VIII. Adjournment Motion by Cundy seconded by Widmoyer to adjourn the Heritage Preservation Commission meeting at 9:15 p.m. All voted aye. The motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Emily BodekerEmily BodekerEmily BodekerEmily Bodeker Date: July 14, 2020 Agenda Item #: V.A. To:Heritage Preservation Commission Item Type: Report and Recommendation From:Emily Bodeker, Assistant City Planner Item Activity: Subject:COA: 4634 Edgebrook Place Action, Discussion CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: The HPC should provide the applicant with feedback on the proposed plans, identifying any desired changes. The applicant will then take into consideration the information received when drafting final plans to be presented for approval at the July HP C meeting. INTRODUCTION: The review process for a replacement of a non-historic resource home in the Country Club District entails a 2- step process. The plans under consideration at this time are fulfilling the second step. Preliminary plans were reviewed by the HPC at the June 9, 2020 HPC meeting. Preservation Consultant Robert Vogel has opined that the proposed home would not look out of place relative to its surroundings; and would not detract from the historic integrity of the adjacent properties or the district as a whole, particularly since the home would be classified as infill construction and not a replacement of a historic home. The Certificate of Appropriateness request entails the demolition of the existing home with the intention of building a new home with attached garage which meets the district’s plan of treatment criteria. The existing home is not classified as a historic resource since it was constructed after the District’s period of significance (1924- 1944), thus its demolition is not an issue; however the construction of a replacement home is subject to the HPC review and approval. Notices were sent out to property owners within 200-feet informing residents how to provide feedback. One way to provide feedback was through the City's Better Together page. https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/coa ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report Applicant Submittal Meeting #2 Aerial Map Consultant Vogel Memo July 14, 2020 Heritage Preservation Commission Emily Bodeker, Assistant City Planner Certificate of Appropriateness: 4634 Edgebrook Place-demolish existing home and construction of a new home and attached garage Information / Background: The subject property, 4634 Edgebrook Place, is located on the west and south side of Edgebrook Place. The existing home is a two-story residence that was built in 1951. The Certificate of Appropriateness request entails the demolition of the existing home with the intention of building a new home with attached garage which meets the district’s plan of treatment criteria. The existing home is not classified as a historic resource since it was constructed after the District’s period of significance (1924-1944), thus its demolition is not an issue; however the construction of a replacement home is subject to the HPC review and approval. Final Plan Evaluation: The Heritage Preservation Commission reviewed the preliminary plan at their June 9, 2020 meeting at which time they heard comments from both the applicant and received comments through the online correspondence form and Better Together Edina. The HPC took no action at that time, but rather provided the applicant with feedback relative to suggested changes to the plans. The applicant considered the commissions feedback when crafting the final plans offered for consideration at this time which includes the following modifications: • Change in height of the attached garage • Change in massing of the attached garage • Floorplan modification on the second floor of the attached garage • Removal of the chimney on the attached garage STAFF REPORT Page 2 Analysis & Recommendation: The final plans have been reviewed by Preservation Consultant Vogel who determined that the design of the new home complies with the Secretary of the Interior’s standards for rehabilitation and the guidelines for new construction in the Country Club District plan of treatment. The plan of treatment directs the design of new houses to meet the original Thorpe deed restrictions and be compatible with existing historic houses in materials, size, scale, color, and texture; however there is no requirement for new houses to imitate an earlier style or period of architecture. The proposed home is compatible with the historic character of the district and will cause no harm to adjacent historic homes. Staff agrees with Consultant Vogel’s evaluation and recommends approval of the proposed new home at 4634 Edgebrook Place. If the homeowner is agreeable consultant Vogel recommends an archeology survey or phase 1 shovel test. This would be completed prior to construction. Findings supporting the recommendation for approval include: 1. The final plans reflect changes suggested by the HPC during the preliminary review at the June 9, 2020, HPC meeting; 2. The applicant has met all of the procedural requirements required for the replacement of a non-historic resource in the Country Club District; 3. The proposed plan meets the criteria set out in the design review guidelines of the Country Club District Plan of Treatment; and 4. The proposed new house will be visually compatible with the historic period revival style homes in the neighborhood and should not detract from their historic character. Approval is conditioned on the following: 1. Plans electronically submitted to staff on June 25, 2020. 2. A year-built plaque is displayed on the home. 3. The HPC’s staff liaison is provided a final inspection of the home prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 4. Photographs of all elevations of the new construction shall be provided once the house is completed. 1 4634 Edgebrook Place Edina, Minnesota 2 Proposed Materials Main Home Façade: white painted brick, with stepped surface for textural composition Fascia Color: Sherwin Williams Pure White (SW 7005) or client selected alternative in same color range Flashing: copper at all chimneys and exposed surfaces, colored aluminum at all roof areas and valleys to match roofing material color in close proximity Roofing: Davinci Slate Tiles, or selected alternative to match in kind Chimneys: white painted brick, with stone cap and clay chimney cap Project Narrative With its idyllic views of Minnehaha Creek, the design for the home of Anastasia and William Hoeft has one goal in mind; to look as if it had always been there. Using its surroundings as a catalyst, the exterior of the house was delicately detailed and designed to pull from the time period of the neighboring homes. With the play of mass and forms, this home tells a story as if it were built upon through generations. Situated in a similar location as the previous structure, this home pulls itself away from the curb and curves as it makes its way from the left to the right, mimicking the street. The house separates itself form the garage, only connected by a small breezeway, which allows each structure to have its own appropriate scale. Intersecting gables help create the home and allows for its form to stay simple and understated. Romance starts to appear with wooden arches and intricate brackets, while slopping roof lines descend down to the head of the windows and doors of the main level, creating a more welcoming scale to visitors. Hip dormers and window placements offer a playfullness to the exteriors that is a result of function-follows- form approach. The exterior of the home acts as a new friend, offering only small glimpses of its interior on first approach but opens itself up to you as you get to know it. With its more public rooms at the rear of the home to capture views of the surrounding nature, it protects itself from the world beyond. Creating its own identity, while still holding true to its history, this home doesn’t just become a member of the neighbor, it becomes a staple. Statement From Homeowners Dear Historical Preservation Committee and City of Edina Officials, We are beyond thrilled to return to our childhood and young adult neighborhood of Country Club as empty nesters. It has been a blessing to work with our professional team to create a home that upholds the integrity of the architecture of Country Club. It is important to us to use quality materials, design details and authenticity of the English Cottage style we favor and is represented in Country Club. Also equally important is the scale of our home and its relationship to our neighbors. The home sits beautifully on the lot adhering to the original footprint and we have minimized our two garages to reflect what we see on Edgebrook Place. We submit this plan with great excitement and anticipation of your approval and hope you will at some point come visit us so we can meet you in person. Thank you for your time and efforts to maintain the charm and beauty of Country Club. Our best regards, Anastasia & William Hoeft 3 Exterior Rendering - 4634 Edgebrook Place 4 Exterior Rendering - 4634 Edgebrook Place 5 Exterior Rendering - 4634 Edgebrook Place 6 Exterior Rendering - 4634 Edgebrook Place 7 Main Level Floor Plan - 4634 Edgebrook Place 1 2 3 4 8 12 Scale: 1’-0” = 1/8” Master Bedroom HisCloset - Carpet Master Bath Master W.C. Master Vestibule HerCloset - Carpet Dining ClosetAnte Main Hall Living Kitchen Breezeway Pantry Sun Room- - Vaulted (wood clg) FrontPorch Bar Garage- Conc. w/ epoxy finish- In-floor heat 26 9'-6"7'-0"9'-5" 6'-3" 24 pocketdoor 4'-4"4'-112"4'-0"3'-6"7'-8"Up 17 R13'-312"Counterw/ drawersbelow 36 x 80 customwood door 26 30 door w/"armoire" front King 13'-6"16'-0"Master Sitting 11'-11"11'-7" 3'-4" 26 30 c.o. 36 opng 14'-514"60 c.o. 4'-0" 3'-712" Up 18 R 5'-4"4'-0"3'-8" Breakfast Sink Bench w/hooks abv.30" oven& steamoven36" ref. / frzr 36 c.o.28 c.o. 3'-6"3'-6"48" rangetopCloset armoireBench 4'-012"3'-6"4'-012" 3'-6" x8'-0"table 4'-0"36" sink18'-412"14'-112"24 19'-7"7'-612" Down Entry /Stair Hall Curved low wall 26 c.o.Hooks1'-4"Bench 1'-8"1'-8"10'-0"4'-8" 39" Øtable Pass-thruwndw 18'-4" Powder4'-0"15"ice24" d.w.30" wineref. w/ref.drawers 4'-10"Eq.. RearHall 24" ref.drawers 24" ref.drawers 36" ref. / frzr Linen 1'-2"1'-4"Equal Equal 3'-258"3'-6"6'-0" 30 c.o. 4'-2" Equal Equal4'-0"Flush hearth 3'-6" 2'-91 4" Step 5'-8"8"8"Overall tubshowndashed 26 StackdW/D Tv abv. f.p. 40 opngEqual Equal80" tv(72.4" x41.4") Openstorage Clg-hunggas heater "Isokern" 42"magnum f.p.w/ gas loginsert 1'-8" raisedhearth "Isokern" 36"magnum f.p.w/ gas loginsert 3'-11"28 4'-0"4'-0" 30 ratedwood door Workbench 10'-0" w. x 8 ' - 0 " h . o . h . d o o r w/ perim e t e r w e a t h e r s t r i p p i n g 86'-118" 19'-512"1'-6"9'-412"20'-712"1'-312"11'-412"9'-558"13'-0" 6'-2"9"5'-712"9"6'-2"44'-0"22'-6" 30'-6" 4'-0" 10'-0" 3'-0" 10'-0" 3'-6" 86'-118" 19'-2"6'-2"5'-1"10'-2"11'-3"11'-912"14'-012"8'-518"8'-612"3'-1158"12'-618"13'-0"6'-4"9'-0"5'-7"65'-9"12'-0" 2'-4" x 7'-7" steelwndws (5 thus) UCA2854 UCA2864 UCAFCIR3950UCA2854UCA2864UIFD3080 Custom clad casementpicture unit 5'-0" x7'-3 12" (frame size)UDHG24032/40UCA3272 UCA3272UCA1872UCA1872 UCA1856 Custom cladcasement unit2'-8" x 7'-3 12"(frame size)Custom cladcasement unit2'-8" x 7'-3 12"(frame size) Custom cladcasement unit2'-8" x 7'-3 12"(frame size) Custom clad casementpicture unit 6'-5 34" x7'-3 12" (frame size)UIFD3080 Roof & bracketsabv. shown dashed 2'-4" x 7'-3 1 2" steelwndws (4 th us)UDHG22632/40UDHG22632/40 UDHG22632/40 UDHG22632/40 UDHG22632/40 UDHG22632/40 UDHG22632/40 UDHG22632/40UDHG22632/40UDHG22632/40UDHG22632/40UDHG22632/40UDHG22632/40UCA2854UCA2854 (4 thus) UCA2854 UDHG22632/40 UDHG22632/40UDHG22632/40 UDHG22632/40UDHG22632/40 UDHG22632/40 UDHG22632/40UDHG22632/40UDHG22632/40UDHG22632/40UDHG22632/40UDHG22632/40 UDHG22632/40UCA2432UCA2864 Glass front cab.w. mirrored back(brass / gold trim) Bamboopole clg w/wood beams Painted large scalecheckered floor Wiring for electricshades @ wndws facingpond (except Breakfast) Corrugated metalwainscot interior Wiring for electricshades @ wndws facingpond (except Breakfast) Bench Flip-up top forboot storage TileWood4'-018" 7'-6" 30" h. base cab.w/ glass displaydoors abv.12" d. cab.UDHG24032/40UDHG24032/40 UDHG24032/40UDHG24032/4034'-6" GaragePorch 30 x 80 customwood doo r UCA2854Down18 R12'-0"13'-10"Wndw well below 28 30 c.o.UCA2854UCA2854UCA2854UCA2854UCA2854UCA2854 ( 5 t h u s )4'-0"UCA2854 ( 2 t h u s ) 8 Upper Level Floor Plan - 4634 Edgebrook Place Scale: 1’-0” = 1/8” UpperStair Hall Laundry UpperBath # 1 UpperBed # 1 SharedBath UpperBed # 2 UpperBed # 3 UpperHall King Down 18 R 26 Sink W 28 8'-0"14'-612" 4'-0" 26 7'-412" 24 26 c.o. 15'-6"11'-8"26 3'-0"5'-278" Linen 24 4'-0"13'-8"13'-4"Hooks Centerline ofgable /wndw below ± 6'-10"wall hgt 8'-0"4'-0"4'-0" 30 c.o. 4'-0" 30 c.o. Hooks 26 3'-6" ± 5'-3 58"wall hgt ± 5'-3 58"wall hgt BedAnte Upper ± 6'-0"wall hgt ± 5'-0"wall hgt ± 7'-8 18"wall hgt Outside face ofstone abv.shown dashed 3'-412"± 7'-7 12"wall hgt ± 6'-0"wall hgt ± 7'-7 12"wall hgt ± 7'-7 12"wall hgt 16'-514" 6'-678" D Risersbelowshowndashed Pair of16 doors Ledge ± 4'-0"wall hgt ± 4'-0"wall hgt 26 4'-0"26 Down 17 R UCA2854 UCA2854UCA2864 (2 thus) UCA2854 (2 thus)Steel window- 10" x 2'-7"UCA2864 (2 thus)UCA2864 (3 thus) UCA2854UCA2854 UCA2432 (2 thus)UCA2854 (2 thus)UCA2854 (2 thus)UCA2854 (2 thus)UCA285464'-614" 7'-138"4'-212"5'-7"10'-334"15'-914"13'-7"3'-8"4'-312" See RoofPlan forchimneydims 46'-0"Outside face ofsheathing belowshown dashed Outside face ofsheathing belowshown dashed Outside face ofsheathing belowshown dashed Outside face ofsheathing belowshown dashed Outside faceof sheathingbelow showndashed 8'-412"6'-1112"17'-1"13'-7"64'-614" 7'-138"11'-5"3'-2"3'-9"1'-914"15'-1"5'-734"3'-1034"5'-7"2'-612"4'-634"46'-0"11'-612"16'-512"1'-1038"3'-818"4'-11"5'-878"958"1'-0"34'-6"44'-0"34'-6" 5'-512" 6'-612"Queen± 5'-8" wall hgt 26 30 c.o. 26 Linen 26 20 BathAnte Shared 3'-0" Bed # 1Ante Upper 26King 26 UpperCloset # 2 4'-912"7'-912"4'-2"4'-5"5'-3"11'-6"Books Wiring for electric shades@ wndws facing pond 23'-7" 5'-512" ± 8'-0" clg hgtshown dashed± 2'-0"wall hgt Risers belowshown dashed ± 7'-1 12"wall hgt 16'-0"18'-912" ± 5'-0"wall hgt ± 6'-8"wall hgt 24 AtticBath AtticStorage AtticOfficeUCA2854 26 c.o. 26 Cab. 9 1 2 3 4 8 12 Scale: 1’-0” = 1/8” Edgebrook Pl Elevation - 4634 Edgebrook Place Main level clg(+/- 9'-0") Upper level clg(+/- 9'-0") Top of typ.Main level subfloor Top of typ.Upper level subfloor 12 18 12 18 Faux slate roof 12 18 12 5127 12 16 Garage clg(+/- 9'-0") Top of typ.Garage attic subfloor Raised clg @Master Bedroom Garage attic clg(+/- 8'-0") 12 10 12 18 31'-7" ridge hgt20'-918" building hgt(average distance ofthe highest gable)CurvedISSUE DATES THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIO BY MURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN, INC MURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN, INC. REPRODUCED OR USED, IN WHOLE O CONSENT OF MURPHY & COMPANY D HOEFTRESIDEN 4634 EDGEBRO EDINA, MN 55 20-123 Scale:14" = 1'-0" Northeast Elevation 10 1 2 3 4 8 12 Scale: 1’-0” = 1/8” Minnehaha Creek Elevation - 4634 Edgebrook Place Top of Garage slab Main level clg(+/- 9'-0") Upper level clg(+/- 9'-0") Top of typ.Main level subfloor Top of typ.Upper level subfloor 12 18 12 16 Garage clg(+/- 9'-0") Top of typ.Garage attic subfloor Garage attic(+/- 8'-0") Raised clg @Sun Room Deep stone sill 12 10 12 18 12 18 12 3 12 18 12 ISSUE DATES THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICA BY MURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN MURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN, IN REPRODUCED OR USED, IN WHO CONSENT OF MURPHY & COMPA HOEFTRESIDEN 4634 EDGEBR EDINA, MN 5 20-123 May 11, 2020 [Prelimina May 15, 2020 [Prelimina May 22, 2020 [HPC Rev Scale:14" = 1'-0" Southwest Elevation 11 North Elevation of the House - 4634 Edgebrook Place 1 2 3 4 8 12 Scale: 1’-0” = 1/8” Top of Garage slab Top of typ.Main level subfloor Breezeway 8'-718"Rough frmg hgt8'-1012"Rough frmg hgt11'-514"Poured wall hgtMain level clg(+/- 9'-0") Upper level clg(+/- 9'-0") Top of typ.Upper level subfloor 12 18 Raised clg @Sun Room 12 5 12 18 12 6 124 12 13 123 Scale:14" = 1'-0" Southwest Elevation Scale:14" = 1'-0" Building Section / Northwest Elevation Scale:14" = 1'-0" Building Section / Southeast Garage Elevation 12 South Elevation of the House - 4634 Edgebrook Place 1 2 3 4 8 12 Scale: 1’-0” = 1/8” Main level clg(+/- 9'-0") Upper level clg(+/- 9'-0") Top of typ.Main level subfloor Top of typ.Upper level subfloor 12 16 12 3 4" deep recessesw/ pitched btms 12 16 Garage clg(+/- 9'-0") Top of typ.Garage attic subfloor Garage attic clg(+/- 8'-0") SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE ISSUE DATES THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS HAVE BEEN PROFESSIONALLY PREPARED BY MURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN, INC. AND ARE THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF MURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN, INC. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE SHARED, REPRODUCED OR USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF MURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN, INC. A5 Exterior Elevations May 11, 2020 [Preliminary]May 15, 2020 [Preliminary Pricing]May 22, 2020 [HPC Review]May 28, 2020 [Revised HPC Review]May 29, 2020 [Revised Preliminary Pricing]June 22, 2020 [Revised Preliminary]June 23, 2020 [Revised Preliminary]June 25, 2020 [Revised HPC Review] Scale:14" = 1'-0" Southeast Elevation vation 13 North and South Elevations of the Garage - 4634 Edgebrook Place 1 2 3 4 8 12 Scale: 1’-0” = 1/8” Main level clg(+/- 9'-0") Upper level clg(+/- 9'-0") Top of typ.Main level subfloor Top of typ.Upper level subfloor 12 16 12 3 4" deep recessesw/ pitched btms 12 16 Garage clg(+/- 9'-0") Top of typ.Garage attic subfloor Garage attic clg(+/- 8'-0") SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE ISSUE DATES THESE DRAWINGS AND SPEC BY MURPHY & COMPANY D MURPHY & COMPANY DESIG REPRODUCED OR USED, IN CONSENT OF MURPHY & CO A5 Exterior Elev May 11, 2020 [Preli May 15, 2020 [Preli May 22, 2020 [HPC May 28, 2020 [Revis May 29, 2020 [Revis June 22, 2020 [Revi June 23, 2020 [Revi June 25, 2020 [Revi Scale:14" = 1'-0" Northeast Elevation Scale:14" = 1'-0" Southeast Elevation Scale:14" = 1'-0" Northwest Garage Elevation of ge slab Top of typ.Main level subfloor Top of typ.Main level subfloor Breezeway 8'-718"Rough frmg hgt8'-1012"Rough frmg hgt11'-514"Poured wall hgtMain level clg(+/- 9'-0") Upper level clg(+/- 9'-0") Top of typ.Upper level subfloor 12 18 Raised clg @Sun Room 12 5 12 18 12 6 Breezeway 12 6 Garage clg(+/- 9'-0") Top of typ.Garage attic subfloor Garage attic clg(+/- 8'-0") 124 12 13 123 12 3 SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE ISSUE DATES THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS HAVE BEEN PROFESSIONALLY PREPARED BY MURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN, INC. AND ARE THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF MURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN, INC. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE SHARED, REPRODUCED OR USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF MURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN, INC. A6 Exterior Elevations May 11, 2020 [Preliminary]May 15, 2020 [Preliminary Pricing]May 22, 2020 [HPC Review]May 28, 2020 [Revised HPC Review]May 29, 2020 [Revised Preliminary Pricing]June 22, 2020 [Revised Preliminary]June 23, 2020 [Revised Preliminary]June 25, 2020 [Revised HPC Review] Scale:14" = 1'-0" Southwest Elevation Scale:14" = 1'-0" Building Section / Northwest Elevation Scale:14" = 1'-0" Building Section / Southeast Garage Elevation 14 Street Comparison Drawing - 4634 Edgebrook Pl 2021 Xref .\Site.dwg 1/8” = 1’0” 2021 15 Backyard Images - 4634 Edgebrook PlBrowndal e Av e .Browndale Ave.Edgebrook Pl.Ed g e b r o o k P l . 4634 4638 4630 4626 4622 4618 4614 4610 Street-Facing Driveways/Garages Aeriel view of Edgebrook Place and Browndale Avenue 16 House to the South - 4638 Edgebrook Place 17 Subject House - 4634 Edgebrook Place 18 House to the North - 4630 Edgebrook Pl 19 Neighborhood House - 4610, 4612, & 4614 Edgebrook Place 20 Neighborhood House - 4618, 4622 & 4626 Edgebrook Place 21 Neighborhood House - 4616, 4620, & 4624 Browndale 22 Neighborhood House - 4628 & 4632 Browndale G 1 G 2 POT POT POT POT POT POT POT POT G 1 G 1 G 2G 2 G 2 G 1 G 1 CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB G 1 G 1 G 1 30 BG 14 BG 10 TM 4 TM 9 BG 3 MP 3 MP 6 PT 3 AG 3 AG 5 PT 1 AG 3 PT 2 MP 2 CV 1 CC 11 HM 28 BG 25 BG 6 HM 1 PS 1 CC10 BG 10 TM 4 HA 8 TO 890 89 2 894 89 6 89 8 90 0 902 90490688 8 886 890 892902904906 906 906 904 902 900 898 896 894 892 890 G 2 1 MP 886888894 896 898900 906 CB 907.50 FFE907.50 FFE 907.34 907.50 907.50 905.75 ME ME ME 907.34907.25 TOS 906.75 BOS 907.34 907.00 907.00 1.5%1.5%906.75 BOS 907.00 907.00 907.34 907.00 907.00 907.00 907.00 907.342.9%906.81 907.00 907.34 906.64906.64 906.50 907.00 907.00 907.00 907.00 907.00 907.00 907.00 907.00 907.00 2.0%3 : 1 3:11.7%1.25%1.25%1.6%2.7%906.50 PROPOSED RESIDENCE SEE ARCH. DWGS. PROPOSED GARAGE SEE ARCH. DWGS. EDGEBROOK PLACE MINNEHAHA CREEK TRAFFIC FLOW TRAFFIC FLOW 2 2 4 4 3 1TYP. PROPOSED PATIO PROPOSED DRIVEWAY PROPOSED ENTRY COURTYARD PROPOSED SPA LAWN NO-MOW FESCUE NO-MOW FESCUE LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWN 902.00 TOW 896.00 TOW 901.50 BOW 898.00 BOW 892.75 BOW 1TYP. 907.34 906.50 907.16907.16 NOTE: FINAL GRADE OF SLOPE NOT TO EXCEED 3:1 PLANTING AREA P.A. PLANTING AREA PLANTING AREA PLANTING AREA PLANTING AREA PLANTING AREA PLANTING AREA PLANTING AREA 50' OHWL SETBACK 50' OHWL SETBACK FRONT Y A R D S E T B A C K FE M A 5 0 Y E A R F L O O D L I N E FEMA 5 0 Y E A R F L O O D LI N E SITE PLAN1 L101 SITE PLAN N 1" = 10'-0" SCALE: 1 inch = 0 10'20'5' 10 feet creation date:6/23/2020filepath:/Users/travisvanlierestudio/Dropbox (TVLS)/PROJECTS (DROPBOX)/HOEFT RESIDENCE/2. DWG/1. DRAWINGS/1. PERMIT-SET/L101 SITE PLAN.dwglast saved:travisvanlierestudio June 24, 2020 12:34 PMThe designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings, graphics and specifications thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, governement agencies, and vendors only in accordance with this notice. © Copyright 2020Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. All rights reserved. license no: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 43728 TRA VIS V A N L I ER E date:6/23/2020 4 6 3 4 E D G E B R O O K P L A C E , E D I N A M N 5 5 4 2 4 H O E F T R E S I D E N C E Drawn By: Date: Scale: Drawing: Sheet: 6/24/2020 AB Rev #Description Date ISSUED FOR PERMIT 05-22-20 NOTE: N O T F O R CO N S T RU C TI ON 211 1ST STREET NORTH, SUITE 350 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 t 612 345 4275 GENERAL NOTES 1.SEE SHEET L001 FOR GENERAL NOTES. 2.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFO. 3.ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR, AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE W/ PAVING, CONCRETE, AND WALL CONTRACTORS ON SLEEVE LOCATIONS UNDER DRIVEWAYS, WALKS, AND WALLS. 4.REFER TO SHEET L010 - EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FOR BOUNDARY INFORMATION. ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKING MUST BE PERFORMED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. 5.DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK. 6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES. 7.ALL SITE ELEMENTS SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD AND APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 8.AUTOCAD FILE AVAILABLE TO CONTRACTOR UPON REQUEST FOR FIELD LAYOUT. KEYNOTES 1.EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE(S) TYP. - SAVE AND PROTECT 2.EXISTING NEIGHBORING PROPERTY/SITE FEATURE - SAVE AND PROTECT 3.EXISTING CITY STREET/ALLEY - SAVE AND PROTECT, REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS 4.EXISTING CITY SIDEWALK - SAVE AND PROTECT, REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS SHEET NOTES 1.PROPOSED RETAINING WALL, STEP WITH GRADE 2.PROPOSED COVERED PORCH, SEE ARCH. DWGS. 3.EXISTING DOCK TOTAL HARDCOVER PROPOSED STRUCTURE 4,972 s.f. PROPOSED BACK TERRACE SURFACING 960 s.f. PROPOSED ENTRY PATIO AND WALK SURFACING 683 s.f. PROPOSED SPA 64 s.f. PROPOSED RETAINING WALL 13 s.f. PROPOSED DRIVEWAY (EXCLUDED FROM CALC.)0 s.f. AREA OF PROPOSED HARDCOVER 6,692 s.f. AREA OF PROPERTY 29,625 s.f. LOT COVERAGE AREA RATIO 22.59% LOT COVERAGE AREA RATIO ALLOWED BY CODE 25% PLANT SCHEDULE TREES KEY NAME QTY SIZE PT Populus tremula SWEDISH ASPEN 14 EA.3" CA. B&B PS Pinus Strobus WHITE PINE 1 EA.14' HT. B&B MP Malus sp. 'Prairiefire' PRAIRIEFIRE CRABAPPLE 9 EA.3" CA. B&B CC Cercis canadensis Northern Strain Redbud 2 EA.3" CA. B&B CV Chionanthus virginicus WHITE FRINGE TREE 2 EA.3" CA. B&B AA Amelanchier grandifolia AUTUMN BRILLIANCE 7 EA.10-12' HT. B&B SHRUBS KEY NAME QTY SIZE HA Hydrangea arborecens VANILLA STRAWBERRY HYDRANGEA 4 EA. 1.5" CA. STANDA RD TO Thuja occedentalis 'Techny' TECHNY ARBORVITAE 8 EA.10-12' HT. B&B HM Hydrangea macrophylla x ‘Endless Summer HYDRANGEA ENDLESS SUMMER 15 EA.#10 CONT. TM Taxus x media ‘Taunton’ JAPANESE YEW TAUNTON 24 EA.#10 CONT. BG Buxus x ‘Glencoe’ CHICAGOLAND BOXWOO 96 EA. 24" HT.CON T. OR B&B PERENNIAL AREAS KEY NAME QTY SIZE FORMAL SHADE GARDEN: FOAMFLOWER-Tiarella 'Spring Symphony DWARF MEADOWSWEET -Filipendula 'Kahome' LEOPARD PLANT-Farfugium japonicum JAPANESE ANEMONE-Anemone tomentosa ‘Robustissima’ SWEET WOODRUFF-Galium odoratum 6820SQ.FT. WOODLAND SHADE GARDEN: HYBRID TRILLUMTrillium grandiflorum var. VIRGINIA BLUEBELLS- Mertensia virginica GOLDEN GROUNDSEL -Packera aurea LAVENDER MIST MEADOW RUE-Thalictrum rochebrunianum IRISH LUCK HOSTA- Hosta 'Irish Luck' AUTUMN FERN-Dryopteris erythrosora 1060SQ.FT. SUN BORDERS: ‘MONTROSE WHITE' CALAMINT-:Calamentha nepeta 'BLUE NOTE' BLUE EYED GRASS -Sisyrinchium angustifolium MILLENIUM ALLIUM -Allium 'Millenium 'SEPETEMBER SUN' HOSTA- Hosta 'September Sun' 714SQ.FT. TURF, GROUND COVERS, AND SEED MIXES KEY NAME QTY SIZE G1 SOD 9285SQ.FT. G2 NO MOW FESCUE SEED MIX 8275SQ.FT. TAG QTY Edina, Hennepin, MetroGIS, Edina, Hennepin, MetroGIS | © WSB & Associates2013, © WSB & Associates 2013 4634 Edgebrook Place April 29, 2020 1 in = 75 ft / MEMORANDUM TO: Emily Bodeker, Assistant Planner FROM: Robert Vogel, Preservation Planning Consultant DATE: June 30, 2020 SUBJECT: Additional comments re: 4634 Edgebrook Place (COA for new construction) I have reviewed the revised COA application for construction of a new house at 4634 Edgewood Place in the Country Club District. The plans submitted are not substantially different from the plans reviewed for my previous memorandum (dated May 29, 2020). Based on the discussion I heard when this project was discussed at last month’s HPC meeting, I would like to reaffirm my recommendation for approval of the COA. The existing house is not a heritage preservation resource and contemporary design for infill construction is allowed by the Secretary of the Interior’s standards for rehabilitation, which are, by ordinance, the program regulations for COA decisions. The proposed new construction will not have an adverse effect on the essential historic character of the neighborhood. The replacement home is architecturally compatible in size, scale, color and texture with the surrounding historic homes and in my opinion the postmodernist “New Classical Revival” aesthetic is well suited for infill construction in the Country Club District. As I mentioned in my previous memorandum, this project might provide an important opportunity for the HPC to conduct some useful archaeological work. The predictive model data compiled by Dr. Jeremy Nienow, the HPC’s archaeological consultant, identifies the area bordering Minnehaha Creek as having moderate potential for buried cultural resources associated with ancient Native Americans; the “Mill Pond” area adjoining the Country Club District has also been predicted to contain archaeological evidence of the earliest Euro-American occupation of the Edina Mills community (including Henry Brown’s original Browndale Farm). I believe it would be appropriate for the HPC to request the applicant’s permission to conduct a phase-one archaeological survey of the subject property prior to any construction activities. This investigation could be carried out as a “walk-over” inspection, perhaps coupled with small-scale “shovel-test” excavations, to recover artifacts and other cultural data that might otherwise be destroyed by development activities. The survey could be carried out within a very short timeframe (one or two days) and would not interfere with construction work. Date: July 14, 2020 Agenda Item #: V.B. To:Heritage Preservation Commission Item Type: Other From:Emily Bodeker, Assistant City Planner Item Activity: Subject:2021 Work Plan Discussion Discussion CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Discuss the 2021 Heritage Preservation Commission work plan. INTRODUCTION: 2021 Commission work plans are due on September 25th. ATTACHMENTS: Description Work Plan Timeline 2020 Heritage Preservation Commission Work Plan 2020 Workplan Development Timeline JUNE – AUG WORK PLAN DEVELOPMENT: Commissions should be developing their work plan at the same time liaisons should be sharing their perspectives. JUNE 23 LIAISON MEETING: Work plan prep / check in SEPT MEETINGS: Commission approves proposed work plan. SEPT 25 WORK PLANS DUE: Include liaison comments. OCT 6 WORK SESSION:Chairs present proposed work plan to Council at work session. Liaisons attend. NOV 4 WORK SESSION: City staff presents staff proposed revisions. Liaisons attend. DEC 7 COUNCIL MEETING: City staff incorporates council feedback and submits final draft for approval. JAN 1: Commissionofficially starts implementing work plans. Heritage Preservation 2020 DRAFT Commission Work Plan Template Initiative #1 Initiative Type Completion Date Council Charge Ongoing Ongoing 3 (review and recommend) Lead Commissioners Budget Staff Support Funds available Staff Liaison Preservation Consultant-Robert Vogel Initiative #2 Initiative Type Completion Date Council Charge Ongoing Ongoing 3 (review and recommend) Lead Commissioners Budget Staff Support Funds available Staff Liaison Preservation Consultant-Robert Vogel Initiative #3 Initiative Type Completion Date Council Charge Ongoing Ongoing 4 (review and decide) Lead Commissioners Budget Staff Support Funds available Staff Liaison Preservation Consultant-Robert Vogel Initiative #4 Initiative Type Completion Date Council Charge Ongoing May-20 4 (review and decide) Lead Commissioners Budget Staff Support Progress Report: Review and Recommend Evaluate and recommend potential properties to be added to the Heritage Preservation eligible landmark list. All Commission Award the 2020 Edina Heritage Award during National Preservation Month in May. Use different media outlets to help increase awareness during the Progress Report: Review and Recommend Invite owners of determined eligible properties to designate their properties as Edina Heritage Landmarks and recommend to Planning Commission and City Council. All Commission Review and Decide Progress Report: Review and decide on Certificates of Appropriateness (COA) applications for changes to heritage landmark designated properties. All Commission Review and Decide Funds available , CTS - 5 hrs Initiative #5 Initiative Type Completion Date Council Charge Event May-20 4 (review and decide) Lead Commissioners Budget Staff Support Funds available Liaison - 5 hrs, CTS Initiative #6 Initiative Type Completion Date Council Charge New Dec-20 2 (review and comment) Lead Commissioners Budget Staff Support Funds available Staff Liaison Preservation Consultant-Robert Vogel Initiative #7 Initiative Type Completion Date Council Charge Continue Dec-20 2 (review and comment) Lead Commissioners Budget Staff Support Funds available Staff Liaison Preservation Consultant-Robert Vogel Initiative #8 Initiative Type Completion Date Council Charge Dec-20 Lead Commissioners Budget Staff Support Staff Liaison NA Preservation Consultant-Robert Vogel nomination period to increase interest. All Commission Review and Comment Progress Report: Review and Decide Coordinate a public walking tour around the Edina Country Club golf course area to view historic properties and pieces of the Edina Mill. All Commission, Lead: Annie Schilling Progress Report: Progress Report: Review and Comment Continue the 2019 resurvey of the Country Club District and review the plan of treatment. All Commission Review and comment on staff's adminstrative process improvement for Certificates of Apprpriateness. All Commission Progress Report: Review and Decide Apply for CLG grant to test the archeological model. All Commission Initiative #9 Initiative Type Completion Date Continue Ongoing 2 (review and comment) Lead Commissioners Budget Staff Support NA Progress Report: Progress Report: Review and Comment Appoint up to two members members to provide feedback on HRRC's initiative (#4) to create an assessment rubric / recommendation process for City facility artwork and décor before final recommendation goes to City