Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-04-10 Parks & Rec Comm PacketAgenda Parks and Recreation Commission City Of Edina, Minnesota City Hall, Council Chambers Tuesday, April 10, 2018 7:00 PM I.Call To Order II.Roll Call III.Approval Of Meeting Agenda IV.Approval Of Meeting Minutes A.Minutes: Parks & Recreation Commission March 13, 2018 V.Community Comment During "Community Comment," the Board/Commission will invite residents to share relevant issues or concerns. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Board/Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Board/Commission might refer the matter to sta% for consideration at a future meeting. VI.Reports/Recommendations A.Memory Garden Renovation Design B.Arden Park Ash Trees C.Braemar Park Master Plan Review D.Comprehensive Plan Update VII.Chair And Member Comments A.City Council Updates March 20 and April 3, 2018 VIII.Sta0 Comments IX.Adjournment The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing ampli4cation, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Date: April 10, 2018 Agenda Item #: IV.A. To:Parks and Recreation Commission Item Type: Minutes From:Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Parks & Recreation Commission March 13, 2018 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Minutes: Parks & Recreation Commission March 13, 2018 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Edina Parks & Recreation Commission Braemar Arena Tuesday, March 13, 2018 7 p.m. I. Call To Order Chair Good called the meeting to order at 7 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering roll call were Commissioners Good, Dahlien, Ites, McAwley, Nelson, Strother and Student Members Kiely and Schieffert. Commissioner Miller arrived at 7:05 p.m. Commissioner Burke arrived at 7:10 p.m. Commissioner Willette arrived at 7:50 p.m. Absent was Commissioner McCormick Staff present: Staff Liaison Ann Kattreh, Assistant Parks & Recreation Director Susan Faus, Administrative Coordinator Janet Canton and General Manager Braemar Arena/Sports Dome Chad Eischens III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion made by Nelson to approve the meeting agenda. Motion seconded by Strother. Motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion made by Dahlien to approve the Feb. 13, 2018 minutes. Motion seconded by Nelson. Motion carried. V. Community Comment None VI. Special Recognitions and Presentations Chair Good introduced the new Parks & Recreation Commissioner Rick Ites. Commissioner Ites took a few minutes to introduce himself to the commission. VII. Reports/Recommendations A. Braemar Arena Tour Chad Eischens, General Manager of Braemar Arena and Sports Dome, gave the commission a tour of Braemar Arena and Sports Dome. Commissioners asked questions throughout the tour and after. B. Comprehensive Plan Update Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Chair Good introduced Planning Commissioner Todd Thorsen. The Parks & Recreation Commission will provide their section of the Comprehensive Plan to the Planning Commission and from there it will go to the City Council. Chair Good went over the fourth iteration of the Comprehensive Plan and shared the changes that were made from inputs he received last month. He added that the input he recently received from Commissioner McCormick will be included in the fifth iteration. Chair Good then reviewed the structure. Commissioners asked questions and gave input. Chair Good noted their next large goal is to review their section of the Comprehensive Plan with the Planning Commission on April 11. Planning Commissioner Thorsen added that at some point it will be handed off to the consultant to put it all together. C. Annual City Council Joint Work Session Prep Chair Good informed the commission the Annual City Council Joint Work Session will be held on Tuesday, April 3 at 6:15 p.m. Chair Good asked the commissioners for their input and insights on what they would like to discuss with the City Council during their joint work session. The following items were discussed: • Arden Park – Update • Braemar Comp Plan – Next steps • Fred Richards Park – Update • Funding for the Future – Consideration of exploring alternative funding sources for parks Chair Good asked each of the commissioners what their first and second priorities would be. It was noted Arden Park was the most popular followed closely by the Braemar Comp Plan. D. 2018 Work Plan Update Updates were given for the following 2018 Work Plan initiatives: • Arden Park Natural Resource Plan – Staff Liaison Kattreh has been working with the Arden Park Neighborhood Association to find a shelter Building/Playground Committee. They also need to start talking about the large number of ash trees on the property because at some point they will be impacted with Emerald Ash borer. A big decision will need to be made regarding how aggressive hey want to be in a plan to remove and replace ash trees. It was also noted to add Commissioners Ites and Nelson to this initiative. • Weber Woods – There was no update; this initiative will probably not happen this year. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. • Study and Report for Field, Court and Rink Capacity and Utilization – Chair Good noted this initiative should be started in the next 30 days. It was noted to add Commissioner Burke to this initiative. • Comprehensive Plan – Everything is going good. • More Clearly Define Formal Relationship between the City and the John Philip Sousa Band – Commissioners Miller and Kiely will be meeting with Scott Neal and Scott Crosbie in the next week to hear both sides. There should be more information in the near future. VIII. Chair and Member Comments • Commissioner Dahlien asked if there is a master calendar indicting when and what tournaments are being held at the various facilities. Assistant Parks & Recreation Director Faus indicated there is not one master calendar for all of the facilities. The best place to find that type of information would be on the website in the calendar section of each of the facilities. • Chair Good formally thanked Mr. Eichsens for hosting tonight’s Parks & Recreation Commission meeting and giving them a tour; it is nice to see what is happening at Braemar Arena and Sports Dome. • Chair Good formally thanked Planning Commissioner Thorsen for representing the Planning Commission and attending tonight’s Parks & Recreation Commission meeting and appreciates the insights he gave the commission on their Comprehensive Plan. • Chair Good recognized and congratulated the Edina High School Girl’s Hockey team for taking first place in the Minnesota State High School Girl’s Hockey Tournament and the Edina High School Boys Hockey team for taking third place in the Minnesota State High School Boy’s Hockey Tournament. • Chair Good indicated he recently saw some discussion on social media regarding heavy use and possible safety issues at the sports dome on Family Night (which is held on Saturday nights from 6:30 – 8:30 p.m.). Commissioner Dahlien indicated he was at that Family Night and there were all kinds of team events going on, balls flying all over and men playing football and baseball. He noted the two staff members behind the desk didn’t go into the facility at all which was a little concerning since there was a little bit of policing that needed to be done. Commissioner Dahlien suggested some parameters be set around what is Family Night. Chair Good commented the general premise seemed to be what exactly is family night; is it really just an open dome or is it intended to designate some specific types of activity. IX. Staff Comments Staff Liaison Kattreh gave the following updates: Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. • On March 21 the annual Chair and Vice Chair liaison meeting will take place at 6 p.m. • The Board and Commission Annual Recognition event that will take place on April 16 at 5:30 p.m. at Braemar Golf Course; commissioners will be receiving an invitation to this event. • Three of the four restaurants who submitted Request for Proposals for the Braemar Golf Course restaurant were interviewed. The interview team was unanimous in their choice of Red River Kitchen. The hope is to have the lease ready to present to the City Council at their second meeting in April. • Tom Swenson, Maintenance Superintendent of Braemar Golf Course, has been hired to be the new Assistant Director of Parks & Natural Resources. He will work both positions until his current position at Braemar Golf Course is filled. • Staff Liaison Kattreh today met with the Executive Director of People for Parks; one of the fundraising arms for the Minneapolis Park Board to discuss fundraising opportunities in Edina. If the commission is looking to add an additional initiative to their Work Plan this may be something to look into. X. Adjournment Motion made by McAwley to adjourn the March 13, 2018 meeting at 8:45 p.m. Motion seconded by Nelson. Motion carried. Date: April 10, 2018 Agenda Item #: VI.A. To:Parks and Recreation Commission Item Type: Report and Recommendation From:Susan Faus, Assistant Parks & Recreation Director Item Activity: Subject:Memory Garden Renovation Design Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Information only. No action requested. INTRODUCTION: The Edina Garden Council has been planning the redesign of the memory garden at Arneson Acres for the past year. The Edina Garden Council has been actively fundraising to finance the entire project. The project has been planned to be completed in phases as monies are secured. The anticipated cost for the entire project is $60,000. The cost for phase 1 is $25,000. City staff has been involved in the design and fully support the project.Tony Siebenaler-Ransom from Tsuke Studio will provide a brief presentation on the process and update the P arks & Recreation Commission on the overall design. The City would not have been able to complete this project without the generous donations from the Edina Garden Council. ATTACHMENTS: Description Arneson Acres Graphics studio෇ॻӃTSUKE Garden Styles:Mix of styles w/ some formality to echo Allee English garden style and some features of Japanese garden style Gardens vs. Turf:Beds located in turf, rather than all garden beds. 30%-50% turf; more Garden than grass. However, not a bunch of little beds all over. Seating Areas:Quiet contemplative space. Seating areas of 1- 2 or 3- 4 people. 15 to 20 capacity in entire garden. Encourage small group usage, not large group Benches:Wooden benches with backs. Boulders as benches. Seat walls, too. Paths:No mulch paths. Paver/stone/gravel paths to be explored. Primary and secondary path network. Stamped concrete options too. ADA considerations and accessible options. Schematic Design Decisions:Feedback and discussion will identify the overall design layout. Individual features, such as arbors, entries, or walls, will be added or subtracted from the layout. Initial material choices will be identified for paths and patio areas.Hybrid Concept:All the decisions from the schematic design review will then be integrated into the design to create the Hybrid Concept. This design will integrate all of the design decisions and identify planting plans, material selections, and include of the features for the final plan, and will undergo final review. Final Design:After final review, any small changes identified by the City of Edina, or the Parks Dept will be integrated into the final design, and construction documentation will commence. Stone and Walls:Stone walls intersecting the grade. Stoneoutcroppings-- but not too much! Flagstone pavers-- close fit joints. Planting:“Goldilocks” spacing, not too close, not to sparse-- just right. Include seasonal bulbs. Some shrubs- especially blooming ones. Judicious use of conifers. Four season interest. Diversity of plants. Other Features:Not rustic styles. Pergola. Sculpture - not figure, more abstract. Moon window. Self-contained water feature. Process Process: How we got here... Next Steps: How we move forward...Hybrid ConceptFinal DesignReviewConst.DocumentsSchematic Design6-8 weeks Iteration6-8 weeks Review ProcessIndeterminate Final Design Dev6 weeksWe are hereOther Features:Not rustic styles. Pergola. Sculpture - not figure, more abstract. Moon window. Self-contained water feature. Path Layout:Option A was top choice, Option B was second B studio෇ॻӃTSUKEHybrid Design 1”: 8’ turf specimen tree sculpture garden bed swing benchon arbor turf columnartrees multi-stemunderstorytrees 6 new conifers new conifers cloister shade garden new arborvitae bluestoneflagstoneedge bluestoneflagstonepath gravelpath pergola stone seatwall seatwall bench w/back bench w/back rustic stonepath low shrub border edge stoneoutcropping paver pathrunning bond new arbarch entry entrywaygardens entrywaygardens existing arbentry arch existing arbentry arch stone fence moon door existing arb hedgeentrance monument 6 6 studio෇ॻӃTSUKEHybrid Design - Topography 1”: 16’ studio෇ॻӃTSUKEHybrid Design - Rooms 1”: 16’ studio෇ॻӃTSUKEHybrid Design - Features Garden styleGarden styleGarden style Garden style studio෇ॻӃTSUKEHybrid Design - Features Pergola - rectangular Fence - alt option Fence - alt option Pergola - bench swing Pergola - bench swing Pergola - bench swing BenchPergola - curved w/ vines Stone wall - drystack, seat wall Stone wall - drystack Stone Fence Stone Fence Stone Fence Stone Fence studio෇ॻӃTSUKEHybrid Design - Features Brick pavers - running bond Boulder - seating Stone outcropping - grade retention Stone outcropping - grade retention Stone outcropping - grade retention Brick pavers - running bond Soldier courseBrick pavers - patterning Stone Entry MonumentsSeating areaSeating area Steel Moon Door Steel Moon Door Sculpture large studio෇ॻӃTSUKEHybrid Design - Cloister 1”: 16’ Meander cobblestone path small fountain benches studio෇ॻӃTSUKEHybrid Design - Approach - New Trees X X X X Concolor Fir Concolor Fir White Pine Norway Spruce Black Hills Spruce Black Hills Spruce Swiss Stone Pine Korean Fir Date: April 10, 2018 Agenda Item #: VI.B. To:Parks and Recreation Commission Item Type: Report and Recommendation From:Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director Item Activity: Subject:Arden Park Ash Trees Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve a recommendation for ash trees at Arden P ark INTRODUCTION: Please see attached staff report. ATTACHMENTS: Description Arden Park Ash Tree Staff Report Arden Park Tree Map EAB Infestation Map Tuesday, April 10 2018 Parks & Recreation Commission Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director Arden Park Ash Trees Information / Background: At the joint work session with the Parks & Recreation Commission (PARC) and City Council on April 3, the City Council and PARC received a brief update on the status of Arden Park. One of the topics of discussion was proactive ash tree removal. The City Council asked PARC to make a recommendation to the Council on a plan for proactive ash tree removal at Arden Park. Tree Removal Update and Ash Trees Based on the current status of pre-60 percent design, 68 of 457 trees will have to be removed for construction. Tree removal during the concept phase of the design was estimated at over 90 trees for the creek remeandering alone. Twenty-four of the 68 trees slated for removal are ash trees. Of the 457 trees within the project scope, 77 are ash trees. Of the 77 ash trees, 47 have a DBH (diameter at breast height) less than 12” and 30 ash trees have a DBH greater than 12”. Of the 24 ash trees proposed to be removed for construction, 7 have a DBH of 12” or greater. City Forester Luther Overholt also recommends injecting 3 trees in the park to prevent Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) and hopefully save the trees. Of these significant trees, one of the trees is along Minnehaha Boulevard, one is on Brookview Avenue and the other is close to the playground. It is also worth noting that a significant additional part of the Arden Park plan will be to remove buckthorn in the park. It should be recognized that the removal of this invasive species will significantly change the look of the landscape. Views of the creek are currently mostly blocked by thick stands of buckthorn. EAB-killed trees dry out quickly and become hazard trees in less time than after a normal tree death. Hazard trees are trees that can be dangerous because of the possibility of them falling over or large branches breaking off, with a potential to cause personal injury to people. Minnesota Department of Agriculture considers May 1 – September 30 to be the flight season for emerald ash borer (EAB). This means that EAB adult beetles are emerging from infested wood or trees and flying in search of new STAFF REPORT Page 2 hosts during this time. EAB larvae complete their development by pupating into adult beetles in the spring and early summer. However, this process only occurs when temperatures are sufficiently warm and the whole process requires a certain amount of accumulated heat – i.e., development time. This project provides a unique opportunity to remove and replace ash trees which will surely die eventually. Emerald Ash Borer has been found in all surrounding communities and it is only a matter of time before it will be identified in Edina. The City Forester would like to remove as many of the ash trees as possible and replace them with much higher quality trees. It will be less expensive, less impactful to new park construction and easier to access many ash tree locations during project construction. While the larger trees with a DBH of greater than 12” have a greater impact to tree canopy, they are also more difficult, costly and dangerous to remove in future years as they die. The ash trees on the north half of the park would definitely be the most difficult and costly to remove in the future. It is recommended to remove at least those during construction. As the project reaches the 60 percent report phase, it will be easier to recommend exact trees for removal. City Forester Luther Overholt will be present at the work session to answer any questions about ash tree removal and tree replacement strategies. PARC Motion Requested: Ash Trees a) Does the Parks & Recreation Commission support the removal of at least 50 of the 77 ash trees in the park project area? 24 of the 50 are part of the creek construction. This would remove approximately 94 total trees in the park. These trees would be replaced at a minimum of 1 to 1 with high value trees. This is 21 percent of the tree cover in the project area. OR b) Does the Parks & Recreation Commission support the removal of all 77 of the ash trees in the park project area? 24 of the 77 are part of the creek construction. This would remove approximately 121 total trees in the park. These trees would be replaced at a minimum of 1 to 1 with high value trees. This is 26 percent of the tree cover in the project area. 52nd Street52ndStreet 53rd Street 54th Street Juanita AvenueIndianola AvenueArden Avenue Kellogg AvenueOaklawn AvenueBrookview AvenueParkPlace MinnehahaBoulevard¯0 250Feet Arden Park Restoration Project Proposed Channel Area of Potential Effect Ash Trees > 12 inch DBH Ash Trees < 12 inch DBH Ash Trees inoculated Trees removed for construction Unaffected Trees Notes:1. Proposed tree removals for construction based onpre-60% design plans and are subject to change asdesign develops2. Aerial imagery from MnGeo WMS service 2016color 7-county Minnesota Department of Agriculture EAB Infestation Map On May 14, 2009, emerald ash borer was confirmed as present in the South Saint Anthony Park neighborhood in St. Paul. Date: April 10, 2018 Agenda Item #: VI.C. To:Parks and Recreation Commission Item Type: Report and Recommendation From:Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director Item Activity: Subject:Braemar Park Master Plan Review Discussion, Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None INTRODUCTION: The City Council asked the Parks & Recreation Commission to provide a recommendation of the prioritization of the projects in the Braemar P ark Master Plan. T he PARC Committee for the Braemar Park Master P lan will begin work shortly on this prioritization. P lease review the master plan (attached) to provide any recommendations to the committee for their consideration in prioritization. ATTACHMENTS: Description Braemar Park Master Plan January 3rd, 2018 with Applied Ecological Services and Trail Source LLC Braemar Park Master Plan City of Edina, MN Table of Contents CHAPTER 1: BACKGROUND 1 Introduction 2 Master Plan Initiatives 2 Existing Conditions Assessment 3 Issues and Opportunities 5 CHAPTER 2: MASTER PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS 7 Overall Master Plan 8 Pedestrian Trail System 11 Pedestrian Trail Layout Plan 12 Mountain Bike Trail System 15 Mountain Bike Trail Layout Plan 16 Ski Trail System 19 Ski Trail Layout Plan 20 CHAPTER 3: SITE IMPROVEMENTS 23 Braemar Golf Course Site Improvements 24 Courtney Fields Site Improvements 26 Braemar Arena and Parking Lot Improvements 28 CHAPTER 4: NATURAL RESOURCES 31 Major Plant Communities 34 Natural Resource Issues and Opportunities 36 Natural Resource Restoration and Management Actions 41 CHAPTER 5: IMPLEMENTATION 47 Preliminary Cost Estimate 48 BACKGROUND 1 INTRODUCTION MASTER PLAN INITIATIVES EXISTING PARK CONDITIONS ASSESSMENT ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan2 3 Introduction In 2016 the City of Edina Parks & Recreation Department explored the opportunity of developing nordic ski trails with machine-made snow and mountain bike trails at Braemar Park. After completing the feasibility study, it was determined a more comprehensive master plan for the entire park should be developed to explore additional opportunities for incorporating new trail, site, and natural resource improvements throughout the park. Master Plan Initiatives Outcomes and recommendations of this master planning effort have focused on the following key initiatives to improve recreational amenities, programming, and land use management for the park. These include: Improving the connectivity of trail systems, access, and wayfinding to park amenities and facilities Providing separated use trail systems to accommodate walkers, mountain bikers, and cross country skiers Identifying new site improvements and recreational amenities to enhance existing facilities Developing recommendations and priorities for improving the quality of natural resources in the park Incorporating sustainable site and trail improvements which promote good stewardship of the parks land and water resources 1 4 2 5 3 Existing Conditions Assessment Braemar Park’s approximately 500 acres of park land serves a wide variety of recreational activities, programming, and user groups throughout the year. The park also contains a large and diverse natural resource environment which visitors can explore along existing trail systems located along the east, west, and south perimeter areas of the golf course. The newly reconstructed golf course is a Certified Audubon Cooperative Sanctuary through its continued commitment to enhance wildlife habitat and protect environmental quality. It preserves and enhances wildlife habitat and maintains a strong water quality and chemical use reduction program. Future park improvements should also be compatible with natural resource management initiatives set forth as part of the golf course renovation. To begin the Master Plan process, an assessment of the park’s existing conditions was inventoried. The following images identify issues to be addressed in the park. Improve accessibility and provide better sense of entry to park facilities Maintain buffers and avoid conflicts with adjacent Municipal and County facilities. Improve park identification and wayfinding signage throughout park propertyIdentify east/west trail alignment connection along south edge of park Maintain natural resource buffer zones with golf course and residential properties adjacent to park City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan4 5 Identify park amenities which can be added to park open space areas to enhance visitor experience. Enhance appearance and sustainability of surface parking lots through landscape and paving surface improvements Realign existing trail system to improve accessibility, sustainability, and to accommodate new trail user groups. Improve entry experience and provide accessible walkways to park facilities from adjacent parking Improve bike and pedestrian trail connections along Hillary Lane and Braemar Boulevard Identify new public uses and activities to be accommodated within golf course property Issues and Opportunities As an initial step to evaluating issues and opportunities to be addressed in the park, five focus study areas were identified to be studied which provide different recreational uses, facilities, and programming within the park (Figure 1). The following issues were identified to be addressed based on comment and feedback gathered from park stakeholder groups, City Staff, and community residents. Figure 1: Issues and Opportunities )y W Bush Lake RdW Bush Lake RdDDeewweeyyHHiillll VVaalllleeyyVViieewwRRdd Dewey Hill RdDewey Hill Rd Braemer BlvdBraemer Blvd Valley View RdValley View Rd 78th St78th St WW7788tthhSStt W 78th StW 78th St MSAS 418MSAS 418 MMccccaauulleeyyTTrr GGlleeaassoonnRRdd McCa u l e y T r McC a u l e y T r 0 150 300Feet [ 21 7 Zone 4 Zone 3 Zone 5 Zone 1 Zone 2 COURTNEY FIELDS1 BASEBALL COMPLEX • Upgrade Field #1 with new lighting & side line fencing • Provide expanded grand stand seating on Field #1 • Improve storage facilities in concession/restroom building • Identify opportunities for adding new park amenities near ballfield area (play area, picnic shelter, patio/ seating area) BUILDING & PARKING FACILITIES • Upgrade building entry experience to Braemar Arena • Identify opportunities for improving landscape/storm water treatment areas for parking lots• Provide gateway park entry/ wayfinding signage at frontage road intersection PUBLIC SAFETY & WORKS FACILITIES • Maintain adequate buffers with maintenance facilities • Identify opportunities for expanding trail circulation within natural resource areas • Develop management recommendations for improving the quality of natural resource areas TRAIL SYSTEM • Create looped perimeter pedestrian trail system around perimeter of golf course• Identify connections to be made to surrounding trail systems • Maintain adequate buffers with golf course and adjacent residential properties • Expand winter recreational use activities for mountain biking, cross country skiing, snow shoeing, sledding, and platform tennis• Natural resource interpretation • Identify mountain bike trail development opportunities GOLF COURSE • Identify opportunities for expanding public use of Braemar Club House• Identify reuse opportunities for remnant golf course land BRAEMAR BOULEVARD • Improve bike, pedestrian circulation, and lighting to create “parkway” feel for roadway• Provide park entrance and wayfinding signage at entrance and roadway intersections ZONE 1 ZONE 2 ZONE 3 ZONE 4 ZONE 5 City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan6 7 MASTER PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS2OVERALL MASTER PLAN PEDESTRIAN TRAIL SYSTEM MOUNTAIN BIKE TRAIL SYSTEM SKI TRAIL SYSTEM City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan8 9 Enlargement 2 Enlargement 1 Academy 9 Course Driving Range 18-Hole Regulation Course KEY TO MAP Existing Soft Surface Trail (0.7 mi) Proposed Soft Surface Trail (1.7 mi) Existing Paved Trail (1.0 mi) Proposed Paved Trail (1.1 mi) Single Track Mountain Bike Trails (5.8 mi) Existing and Proposed On Street Bike Lane Wetland Forest Golf Course Entrance & Wayfinding Signage Spur Trail Connection to Street Spur Trail Connection to Street Spur Trail Connection to Adjacent Properties Entrance & Wayfinding Sign Mountain Bike & Hiking Trailhead Parking Lot Golf Cart Path Pedestrian Soft Surface Trail Proposed Boardwalk Remove Existing Boardwalk Existing Bridge to Remain for Golf Cart Path Remove Existing Bridge Proposed Platform Tennis and/or Pickleball Courts Sledding Hill Existing Golf Practice Hole Playground Area Shade Trees for Seating Embankment Existing Paved Trail Bleacher Shade Structures Premier Field Grandstand Proposed Paved Trail Entrance & Wayfinding Sign Entrance & Wayfinding Sign Overlook/Seating Area Natural Resource Interpretive Area Existing Grade Separated Parkway Trail Proposed Grade Separated Parkway Trail Relocate Existing Bridge Enlargement 3 Overall Master Plan Figure 2: Overall Master Plan City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan10 11 Pedestrian Trail System With a variety of paved and unpaved trail systems present throughout the park, this master plan proposes to establish a more cohesive and interconnected trail system which visitors can use as a recreational amenity and be more easily connected to other park destinations. The following trail design criteria and implementation initiatives have been identified for creating a new pedestrian trail system in the park: 1. Created a contiguous 3 mile looped pedestrian trail system around perimeter of golf course 2. Maintain a minimum 50’ native vegetation buffer between golf course field of play and trail system 3. Strive to maintain an accessible gradient of less than 5% throughout the trail system 4. Install class 2 crushed stone accessible surfacing as part of trail improvements 5. Incorporate a grade separated trail along Braemar Boulevard and Hillary Lane from Gleason Road to the 169 Frontage Road 6. Install crosswalks and stop sign at Valley View Road and Braemar Boulevard to slow traffic 7. Incorporate trail wayfinding signs and map kiosk at trailhead parking lot located adjacent John Harris Drive 8. Minimize shared use trails and crossings between pedestrian and mountain bike user groups 9. Establish a new wetland boardwalk and bridge crossing over Nine Mile Creek on the south end of the park to connect the east and west side trail system 10. Utilize and integrate existing trail alignments where possible to minimize natural resource impacts on natural resources. 11. Create a new high point trail access overlook on the west side of the park. 12. Maintain pedestrian trail spur connections to neighborhoods on the east side of the park and to commercial properties on the south side of the park. ESTABLISHING A PARKWAY EXPERIENCE ALONG HILLARY LANE AND BRAEMAR BOULEVARD Hillary Lane and Braemar Boulevard serve as the main roadway corridor connecting all park destinations. Creating a new parkway character for the roadway by narrowing lane widths using curb and gutter, pedestrian scale lighting, and a grade separated trail will all reduce traffic speeds and create a safer pedestrian and bicycle trail environment. Additional study for assessing wetland impacts, storm water treatment and conveyance, and impacts on the adjacent golf course will be needed to determine final feasibility for implementing parkway improvements in the park. Parkway Trail 26’2’ 8’ City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan12 13 Soft Surface Trail 5’ 12’ 8’ Boardwalk Paved Trail Pedestrian Trail Layout Plan The following types of trail systems are proposed to be implemented in the park to improve pedestrian circulation and access to park facilities. KEY TO MAP Soft Surface Trail (2.4 mi) Paved & Parkway Trail (2.1 mi) Other trails Existing and Proposed On Street Bike Lane Wetland Forest Golf Course Entrance & Wayfinding Signage City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan14 15 Mountain Bike Trail System The planning and development of a single-track mountain bike trail system in the park will focus on having minimal vegetation and grading impacts within the natural resource environment of the park. Mountain bike trail design and implementation guidelines will adhere to the following design criteria: 1. Locate trails a minimum 100’ setback from all adjacent private property lines and golf course edges. 2. Follow design specifications outlined in two of the leading trail building guidelines currently utilized in the United States. These include: “IMBA’s guidelines to building sweet single track trails.” IMBA’s book “Managing Mountain Biking” and the Minnesota DNR “Trail Planning, Design, and Development Guidelines.” 3. Design trails that will bring the rider back frequently to increase their skill level as well as enjoy outdoor physical activity. 4. Design trails that will accommodate all age and skill levels and encourage utilization by entire families. 5. Utilize safety and sustainability as two of the most important considerations for designing and implementing a mountain bike trail system. 6. During construction, incorporate grade or obstacle features on either side of trail alignment to challenge more advanced riders. 7. A trail feature that would attract an experienced rider might include a “rock garden” on an uphill, a small drop from a wooden feature or a roller that if taken at a higher speed would provide the opportunity to get a small amount of “air” under their tires. 8. Incorporate a more difficult climb or a climb of greater duration for fitness training. 9. Incorporate a slightly wider trail width and clear zone for family riders on straighter alignments to accommodate riders two abreast. 10. Accommodate high school league riders who need an adequate trail length and variety of trail features and terrain to accommodate challenging climbs, technical features, and areas where they can practice passing as well as maneuvering to simulate race courses they will ride during the season. City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan16 17 Mountain Bike Trail Layout Plan Mountain bike trail systems are proposed to be implemented within both natural resource areas on the east and west sides of the park. A portion of the trail system and boardwalk crossings on the south edge of the park are designated as shared use trails with pedestrians and bikers to avoid wetland impacts and the need for additional creek bridge crossings. Mountain bike trails are also proposed to be used during the winter months by fat tire bikes to encourage more year round use of the park. 3’ Mountain Bike Trails KEY TO MAP Single Track Mountain Bike Trails (5.8mi) Other trails Existing and Proposed On Street Bike Lane Wetland Forest Golf Course Entrance & Wayfinding Signage City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan18 19 Ski Trail System The newly configured Braemar golf course property offers opportunities for developing an extensive ski trail system when natural snow conditions can provide a solid base for grooming trails. The following design criteria was used for developing an alignment for ski trails on and around the perimeter of the golf course. »Create one way looped trail systems which lead back to clubhouse warming facility »Locate and align ski trails around tee boxes and on the edges of fairways to avoid damage to sensitive turf areas »Groom trails to accommodate both skating and classic skiing techniques on the golf course with some classic only ski trails aligned along pedestrian trails located in natural resource areas »Align a portion of ski trails on walking trails in wooded areas along perimeter of golf course to provide more trail variety in trail. »Groom trails 14’-16’ wide to accommodate winter walkers along outside edge of trail »Maintain separated use trails with fat tire winter mountain bike trails »Final ski trail alignments may need to be modified to respond to final green and fairway layouts to avoid adverse impacts to golf course. City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan20 21 Ski Trail Layout Plan Ski trail alignments have been primarily designated on the golf course to avoid conflicts with fat tire bike riders and avoid the need for removing trees and vegetation in natural resource areas to accommodate wider trails required for cross country skiing. KEY TO MAP Skate & Classic Ski Trail (7.1 km) Classic Only Cross Country Ski Trail (1.1 km) Other trails Existing and Proposed On Street Bike Lane Wetland Forest Golf Course Entrance & Wayfinding Signage 4-6’ CLASSIC TRACK 8-10’ SKATE TRACK Ski Trails City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan22 23 SITE IMPROVEMENTS3BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE SITE IMPROVEMENTS COURTNEY FIELDS SITE IMPROVEMENTS BRAEMAR ARENA AND PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan24 25 Braemar Golf Course Site Improvements John Harris Drive functions as the main entrance drive to the golf course, building entries, and parking lot facilities. Separate drive lanes direct visitors to drop off areas in front of the golf academy, clubhouse, and service entry areas. To simplify drive circulation and reduce pedestrian crossing conflicts, a new pull-off drop off area is proposed in front of the golf academy building and a new turn around and plaza entry adjacent to the club house. With some reconfiguration and grading of the adjacent parking area, a new accessible walk system can be established to all building entries. A separated service access drive to the clubhouse is also proposed to avoid pedestrian conflicts and establish a better entry experience to the clubhouse and restaurant. As a part of providing more recreational amenities at the golf course for the general-public, a new lawn games court area will be installed on the west side of the clubhouse as part of golf course improvements. Master plan recommendations also include adding four pickleball or platform tennis courts on the southeast corner of the parking lot. To further reinforce implementing more sustainable site improvements in the park, permeable paving parking bays are also proposed to be installed to reduce storm water runoff from the site. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS »Establish ADA walk access and turnaround area to clubhouse and restaurant »Add platform tennis and/or pickleball courts »Add multi use lawn game area near clubhouse »Add permeable paving in parking bays to infiltrate storm water runoff Platform tennis courts Pickle ball courts Permeable parking bays Multi-use lawn area KEY DESIGN FEATURES Turn Around/Drop Off Area Lawn Court A r e a Existing Golf Cart Path Putting Green Patio Seating Area Separated Loading/ Service Access Drive Restaurant 30’NORTH Golf Cart Parking Accessible Walk Approach Optional Drop Off Area Driving Range Accessible Walk Approach Seat Wall Building Entry Permeable Paving Parking Bays New Sidewalk Connection Platform Tennis and/or Pickleball Courts Practice Golf Hole Tee Box Planting Feature Planting Feature Flagpole Plaza Entry Bench Seating EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONCEPT PLAN (ENLARGEMENT 1) City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan26 27 Courtney Fields Site Improvements The Courtney Fields ballfield complex is a well-used recreational facility within Braemar Park. To further enhance the quality of the playing experience on the premier field, the addition of grandstand seating, LED field lighting, and sideline netting will all contribute to better meeting the needs of spectators and players. To improve pedestrian circulation around the complex, a new paved trail is proposed around the playing fields and a new accessible path access connecting to the north end parking lot. A new drop off area and sidewalk edge has also been added to create a better sense of entry to the ballfield complex. A new playground facility has also been located adjacent to the existing maintenance facility to better serve the needs of player families with younger children and residents who live north of the park. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS »Establish ADA access trail route to athletic fields »Provide a new playground facility for adjacent neighborhood »Implement a new grandstand seating area and lighting upgrades on premier field #1 »Establish a paved perimeter trail loop around ballfield complex »Create a better sense of entry to ballfield complex from adjacent parking areas »Install hillside bench seating BRAEMAR STADIUM Baseball field grandstand Bleacher shade structure Shade Shelter Playground 50’NORTH Shade Shelter Information Kiosk Permeable Paving Parking Bays Turn Around/Drop Off Area Courtney Fields Entrance Sign and Landscape Feature Shade Trees for Lawn Embankment Play Area Existing Maintenance Facility 6’-0” Paved Trail Player Warm Up Area Upgrade Lighting on Premier Field Hillside Spectator Bench Seating 169 Frontage RoadBraemar Fields Premier Field Grandstand Restroom/Concession Building Woodland Batting Cage Braemar BoulevardValley V i ew Road Woodland Golf Course EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONCEPT PLAN (ENLARGEMENT 2) City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan28 29 Braemar Arena and Parking Lot Improvements The Highway 169 Frontage Road serves as the main front door entrance to the park and parking lot facilities for the Braemar Field and Arena facilities. To create a better park entry experience, additional landscape enhancements along the frontage road right-of-way and within parking lots and the addition of new park identification and wayfinding signage will create a better sense of arrival to the park. Implementing building facade improvements at the Arena entrance to match building materials and signage used at the Braemar Field entry will also help establish a more uniform and updated look for the complex of building facilities at the park. To implement more sustainable best management practices for treating storm water run-off from parking lots, the addition of permeable paving in parking lot bays will dramatically reduce site run off and reduce the potential for erosion during large storm water events. Considerations for protecting ground water aquifers will require further study to determine the viability of using permeable paving systems in the park. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS »Add architectural elements to Arena building façade which mimic Braemar Field Building entry. »Add parking lot island and boulevard landscape treatments »Add park identification and wayfinding signage »Add permeable paving in parking bays to infiltrate storm water runoff Braemar Field Entry Permeable parking lot bays Representative City Park Identification and Wayfinding Signage Braemar Arena facade enhancements BRAEMAR ARENA 2405 Annapolis LaneMinneapolis, MN 55441Phone: 763-571-2995Fax: 763-571-3588www.scoutdoor.com Project Location Job Description Drawing # Drawn By Date Missing Info. Approval Edina Parks Edina Parks 2017 v9 BK 4/26/2017 Entrance Monument Page 2 of 3        Entrance Monument (B)             BUILDING LETTERING SIGN AND METAL SCREENING TO MATCH BRAEMAR FIELD BUILDING NEW SHADE TREES IN PARKING LOT ISLANDS 50’NORTH169 Frontage Road Braemar Field Courtney Fields Drop Off and Turn Around Area Braemar Arena Facade Enhancements Sidewalk edge with open access to lawn embankment Wayfinding/ Information Kiosk Park Identification/ Wayfinding Signage Park Identification/ Wayfinding Signage Flagpole and Landscape Feature Braemar Arena Additional Boulevard Trees Park Identification/ Wayfinding Signage 6’ Sidewalk Parkway Boulevard Tree Plantings Permeable Paving Parking Bays EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONCEPT PLAN (ENLARGEMENT 3) City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan30 31 NATURAL RESOURCES4MAJOR PLANT COMMUNITIES NATURAL RESOURCE ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES NATURAL RESOURCE RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT ACTIONS City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan32 33 NATURAL RESOURCES Historic Conditions The Wisconsin glaciation ended about 10,000 years ago and created the region’s major landforms. The glaciers left a rolling and hilly landscape with lakes and wetlands in depressions. Soils formed primarily from sandy and gravelly glacial outwash on level plains and are generally well drained. Other deposits called moraines appear today as mounds of mixed-up rock, gravel, sand and clay—such as those present in the west and southeast portions of the park. Low spots—or “kettles”— are common in the region, and historically occupied the central portion of the park. According to the Original Vegetation of Minnesota (Marschner 1974), prior to European settlement (circa the mid-1800s), Braemar Park was dominated by wet prairie, with oak savanna and “big woods” forest occupying the park’s upland ridges and hills. According to a custom soil survey report (USDA/ NRCS 2017), the park’s soils are dominated by fill placed in wetlands; this constitutes the majority of the golf course. The park’s higher ground (including current oak woodland and savanna areas) consists of a mixture of soils dominated by sandy loam. The large, open-grown bur oaks on the park’s ridges and hills support that Braemar Park’s uplands were once dominated by fire-maintained woodlands and savannas. Review of historical aerial photographs (the oldest from 1947) shows the majority of the park under agricultural production (e.g., row crops and hayfields), and the park’s higher areas were characterized by savanna and woodlands with a more open canopy than today. Existing Conditions Today, the majority of the park is golf course, including maintained turf, rough areas, rows and patches of trees, and scattered wetlands and drainageways. The perimeter of the park is dominated by wooded areas, including oak woodland and savanna, as well as lowland forest and swamp. Two Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR) Public Waters exist on the park: the South Fork of Nine Mile Creek (which flows through the southern portion of the park) and a public water basin (in the south-central portion of the park). Additional wetlands exist throughout the park, with the largest along the forested northern edge (north of Braemar Blvd/Hilary Ln) and along the southern edge of the park (including the South Fork of Nine Mile Creek). Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapping identifies significant portions of the park within the 100-yr and/or 500-yr floodplain. MnDNR data did not identify any rare natural features, Sites of Biological Significance, or higher quality native plant communities on the park; however, Hennepin County identifies the park within a regional open space corridor. Large stands of oak woodland and savanna (such as those found in the west and southeast portions of the park) are regionally uncommon; based on Minnesota Land Cover Classification System mapping (MLCCS 2004), Braemar Park contains the largest blocks of oak forest/woodland in the City. Larger habitats often provide more valuable habitat (or greater potential), so there are likely plant species and wildlife species (including uncommon or declining species) that use the park’s woodlands and savannas that are less likely to use smaller ones. Of note, the park’s oak savannas represent an opportunity to restore a particularly rare habitat in the region. The ecological assessment for this master plan focused on the site’s major natural areas, presented in Figure 3. All of these natural areas are generally in poor condition due to significant invasion by invasive vegetation and other historical and ongoing disturbances. City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan34 35 Oak Savanna Existing Healthy Wooded Wetlands Existing Healthy Herbaceous Wetlands Herbaceous Upland_ Existing Existing Healthy Healthy Oak woodland Existing Healthy Major Plant Communities Figure 3: Major Plant Communities City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan36 37 Natural Resource Issues and Opportunities NATURAL RESOURCE ISSUES Natural resource management is a key component to the Braemar Master Plan. The management approach to amend the natural resource issues described in the following pages will occur as an integral part of site and trail improvements proposed to be implemented in the park. Invasive plants present the greatest threat to maintaining healthy natural areas at Braemar Park. The park is dramatically and negatively affected by several invasive plant species, which often establish and thrive in disturbed habitats, usually crowding out native plants and animals. Invasive plant species typically have the following characteristics: »Tolerant of a variety of habitat/environmental conditions »Grow and reproduce rapidly, with good seed dispersion »Compete aggressively for resources, such as nutrients, water, and sunlight »Lack natural enemies or effective competitors Invasive plants can lead to low plant diversity, poor wildlife habitat and lessened resilience in the COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME GENERAL ABUNDANCE IN PARK AND CONTROL STRATEGY UPLANDS Common & glossy buckthorn Rhamnus cathartica & Frangula alnus Very common shrub (also in lowlands). Remove all. Non-native honeysuckles Lonicera tatarica, L. morrowii & L. x bella Common shrub. Remove all. Garlic mustard Alliaria petiolata Common herb (also in lowland forests). Remove all. Spotted knapweed Centaurea stoebe subsp. micranthos Common herb (in areas). Remove all. Canada thistle Cirsium arvense Uncommon herb (also in lowlands). Remove all. Siberian elm Ulmus pumila Uncommon tree. Selective removal where it can spread easily. Black locust Robinia pseudoacacia Uncommon tree. Selective removal where it can spread easily. Smooth brome Bromus inermis Uncommon grass. Remove where it threatens active restoration/ management areas. LOWLANDS/WETLANDS Reed canary grass Phalaris arundinacea Common grass. Remove where it threatens active restoration/ management areas. Invasive cattails Typha angustifolia and T. x glauca Common herb. Remove where it threatens active restoration/ management areas. Purple loosestrife Lythrum salicaria Uncommon herb. Remove where it threatens active restoration/ management areas (biological control options). Figure 4: Invasive Plants that Pose Greatest Threat to Braemar Park face of disturbances and environmental change. Controlling invasive plants is often the foundation of most ecological restoration and management efforts. Figure 4 lists the invasive plants that pose the greatest threat to Braemar Park. Invasive animals also have adverse effects on ecosystems. For example, non-native earthworms are likely present in the park’s oak woodlands. These (and many other) invasive animal species cannot be cost-effectively removed or controlled. In these cases, it is advisable to manage the effects of an invasive species, rather than try to eradicate it. Non-native earthworms, common buckthorn, and non-native honeysuckles invade natural areas, initiating a cascade of negative effects. Oak regeneration is suppressed, native shrubs decline, ground vegetation is shaded which leads to the loss of soil-anchoring plants and increasing erosion, and flower resources for pollinators are eliminated, reducing the amount and variety of food for other wildlife and depressing wildlife populations. Non-native and hybrid cattails and Eurasian reed canarygrass are dense in some of the park’s wetlands. These invasive plants often suppress native wetland vegetation, reducing biodiversity and the resiliency of natural areas. However, with ecological management, the situation can be stabilized and even improved. Improving the variety of and vegetation cover by native plants is a good strategy to resist the spread of invasive plants, because native plants have the ability to compete with invasive plants if environmental conditions are favorable. During park management activities, including ecological restoration and management, invasive species may accidentally be introduced or spread across a site. Guidelines have been developed by the MnDNR to avoid introducing or spreading invasive species. NATURAL RESOURCE OPPORTUNITIES Braemar Park contains some of the City’s largest oak woodlands/forests, and as part of a mosaic with other natural areas, the park represents an important natural area complex in Edina. Throughout the Braemar Park master plan project, natural resources have been considered. While multiple demands are placed on urban parks such as Braemar, there is a firm commitment by the City to improve the park’s natural areas through investment in ecological restoration and management. Years ago, the City took steps to protect Braemar Park’s environment by becoming a Certified Audubon Cooperative Sanctuary. Recent work in the Academy 9 portion of the golf course included ecological restoration and native plantings, and this work will continue to expand throughout the remainder of the park’s natural areas in years to come. These efforts will further improve the park’s native vegetation and habitat for a wide variety of wildlife species and will enhance human enjoyment of this important City park. Restoration Potential Given the site’s natural and cultural history, and recent field observations of remnant native plants, it appears that the restoration potential of the site’s upland natural areas is quite good. While often requiring a substantial initial investment (followed by dedicated management and perpetual stewardship), removal of invasive vegetation alone can greatly improve the health of natural areas. For instance, removal of buckthorn (which at Braemar Park will require a substantial initial commitment over several years), will greatly reduce shading of the ground layer, which can “release” dormant native seeds and plants that have been shade-suppressed for years. Continued management and remedial overseeding (where necessary) will result in much improved woodlands and savannas. While ecological restoration will also benefit the park’s lowlands and wetlands, these areas pose a greater challenge. The primary invasive species in the park’s wetlands (cattails and reed canary grass) spread aggressively. Since many of these invasive plant populations are located along the South Fork of Nine Mile Creek and adjacent to off-site wetlands, City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan38 39 there will be ongoing invasion pressure, making control more challenging. For this reason, strategic wetland areas may be selected for restoration, while others are not actively managed. Community Engagement, Education and Volunteers Many benefits can be gained from engaging “citizen scientists”, schools, and other volunteers to assist with observations, data collection, analysis, and ecological management. Benefits of engaging the public and partners are: »The public learns about natural resources, increasing awareness and appreciation of natural areas and the natural world; »Valuable data can be collected for baseline and trend monitoring; »Cost-savings to the City through volunteer labor and in-kind match for grants; and »People will form friendships and form networks to advance the pursuit of natural resource protection, restoration, and management. Volunteer efforts may involve physical labor (e.g., planting trees, removing invasive species) or monitoring/research (e.g., field observations, data collection, and data analysis). Many volunteer activities require oversight by trained volunteers, City staff, or outside experts. Volunteer monitoring or research advances knowledge and builds public support for natural resource programs. One form of citizen engagement that has benefited many communities is organizing and conducting a “bioblitz.” A bioblitz is a 24-hour period when volunteers, supported by experts, document all living species in a given area (e.g., within Braemar Park). Bioblitzes help gather baseline data on plants and animals, while letting people discover the natural world around them. It also gives participants an opportunity to participate in scientific research. MANAGEMENT TASK VOLUNTEER ROLE GENERALLY APPROPRIATE APPROPRIATE WITH TRAINING & OVERSIGHT GENERALLY NOT APPROPRIATE Native seed collection & sowing X Installation of live trees, shrubs, herbaceous plugs X Hand-pulling invasive plants X Dragging buckthorn/brush X Cutting buckthorn/brush X Simple ecological monitoring X Management mowing X Herbicide application X Prescribed burning X Slope stabilization X Construction of water projects and best practices X Technical ecological monitoring X Figure 5: Use of Volunteers for Different Management Tasks. Bioblitzes also bolster more systematic monitoring of vegetation, water and wildlife resources. Volunteers can assist in a variety of tasks, and with additional training and oversight they can accomplish even more. Some volunteer tasks may be one-time events, and other tasks may be repeated over time by dedicated volunteer stewards. Figure 5 summarizes natural resource management tasks for which volunteers can provide assistance. Although assistance by volunteers has no direct cost, the staff time for organizing, training, equipping, and supervising volunteer events is a cost, as are materials (e.g., tools, safety equipment, food and beverage). Thoughtfully planned and executed volunteer programs will help reach the desired audience of potential volunteers, engage them in safe and productive work, and have them return to volunteer with the City again. Regarding implementation of field restoration and management activities, specialized training, oversight, and guidance often involves licensing or certification where required by local, state, or federal law. Personnel involved in ecological restoration and management, especially prescribed burning, herbicide application, brush control, erosion control, and ecological monitoring should receive training commensurate with the activity in which they would be involved. Training is especially important for those activities that may have risk and safety implications to people, property, and sensitive resources. While useful data can be collected by amateurs, ecological monitoring protocols often require a moderate level of expertise to implement accurately and consistently. Implementing monitoring programs may require expertise in plant and wildlife identification, as well as a working understanding of erosion processes and potential solutions. The City may wish to partner with Hennepin County, schools, conservation non-profits, and others to assist with monitoring and reporting. Private consulting ecologists can also be used to provide these services. Pilot Projects Pilot or demonstration projects can be an effective way to advance natural resources restoration and management programs. Pilot projects can be a learning opportunity for City staff and citizens, and improve methods for use in future projects (i.e., adaptive management). Pilot projects should be sited where the community will be able to observe the restoration process and the response of plant communities over time. Temporary or permanent interpretive signage (discussed further below) can make a pilot project more educational for the public. Interpretation Interpretation can take a variety of forms: signs, self- guiding booklets, mobile applications, and expert-led presentations and tours. While some interpretive signage already exist at Braemar, this could be expanded to further address the park’s natural and cultural history, important natural resources, invasive species and other threats to natural areas, stormwater runoff issues and best management practices, and of course ecological restoration and management methods and expected results. Monitoring and Adaptive Management The most successful restoration programs use regular monitoring and reporting as feedback on the program’s effectiveness. Adaptive management (a cycle of implementation, monitoring, evaluation, adjustment, and implementation) is central to the best restoration programs and should begin with the restoration work and continue indefinitely as part of the stewardship of the project area. Monitoring provides an objective measurement of project-specific criteria. Ecological criteria should be measured repeatedly in the field over time and compared with baseline data; this allows tracking of progress and helps direct management to most cost- effectively achieve City goals. A variety of criteria can be monitored to assess restoration and management success. Ecological City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan40 41 monitoring criteria typically include attributes of the site’s vegetation, but criteria can also address wildlife at the site, condition of erosion features, water quality, and other characteristics. Ecological monitoring should be simple and relatively easy to implement, although plant or animal identification skills are usually required. Criteria should be selected in direct response to City goals and restoration and management practices. Monitoring and reporting should be done more frequently at the onset of project implementation, after which frequency can be reduced over time to an intermittent level. NATURAL RESOURCE ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES SUMMARY In summary, issues and opportunities associated with each major plant community are presented in the following table. PLANT COMMUNITY ISSUES OPPORTUNITIES Oak Woodland Moderate to very dense invasion by common buckthorn; some invasive non-native honeysuckle Good restoration potential, based on remnant native species observed; good access for people; relatively large size of southeast woodland could support regionally uncommon forest wildlife Oak Savanna Light to moderate invasion by common buckthorn; some invasive non-native honeysuckle Very good restoration potential, based on remnant native species observed; good access and views for people; oak savannas are one of the most imperiled native plant communities in MN and very rare in the metro area Wooded Wetlands Light to moderate invasion by common buckthorn; some glossy buckthorn; history of altered hydrology Moderate restoration potential; poor access for people Herbaceous Wetlands Dense invasion by invasive reed canary grass and cattails; history of altered hydrology Moderate restoration potential; poor access for people Herbaceous Uplands Generally weedy Good restoration potential; good access for people Figure 6: Braemar Park Major Plant Communities – Issues and Opportunities Natural Resource Restoration and Management Actions Given the City’s goals and the park’s current conditions, it is important to proceed strategically in order to maximize success and control costs. Therefore, natural resource restoration and management at Braemar Park should: »Focus on removal of invasive plant species and promotion of diverse, native species »Prioritize efforts in higher quality natural areas »Integrate and phase in restoration efforts with trail improvements »Establish native vegetation buffer screening with golf course and adjacent residential properties »Focus on areas where invasive plants can be controlled »Be guided by regular monitoring of site conditions »Provide opportunities for natural resource interpretation Based on the principles and guidelines above, the following ecological restoration and management priorities have been established for Braemar Park. Figure 8 shows where each priority area is located in the park. Priority #1 – Restore Large Oak Woodlands and Savannas Being the park’s largest natural areas with the highest restoration potential, these areas (i.e., west woodlands and savannas and southeast woodland) should be restored first. This should entail the following tasks: a) Remove invasive woody vegetation b) Remove invasive herbaceous vegetation c) Install native buffer screening d) Install diverse, native species e) Conduct perpetual monitoring and adaptive management a) Remove invasive woody vegetation. The primary invasive woody species designated for removal are provided in Figure 4 above; however, additional invasive species exist on the site and should be controlled as well. If feasible, invasive woody species (primarily buckthorn) should be removed before or simultaneous with any nearby trail construction; this will facilitate field adjustment of trail alignments and make construction easier. If a phased approach is required (e.g., due to funding limitations), removal should first be conducted along the proposed pedestrian trail, extending to the golf course edge as well as 25 feet toward the center of the woodland. If native shrubs are absent or clearly marked and protected in a given area, it may be appropriate to use vehicle-mounted brush cutting equipment in portions of the site. However, at all times care must be taken to protect desirable native vegetation (woody and herbaceous) and minimize soil disturbance and erosion. Removal should preferentially be done during the winter when soils are frozen and native vegetation dormant. Follow-up treatment will be required for at least 3 to 5 years to address woody invasive resprouts and seedlings. b) Remove invasive herbaceous vegetation. While much less significant in the park’s woodlands and savannas, invasive herbaceous vegetation should also be controlled. The primary invasive herbaceous species designated for removal are provided in Figure 4 above; however, it is possible that other problematic species exist on the site, and they should be controlled as well. Removal of woody invasive vegetation may result in a flush of new ground layer vegetation, including invasive herbaceous plants. As with removal of invasive woody vegetation, care must be taken to protect desirable native vegetation and minimize soil disturbance and erosion. c) Install native buffer screening. Buffer screening should use native species selected for the particular planting location and screening goals. Wild genetic stock from within a 200-mile radius of the park is City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan42 43 preferred over cultivars and more distant genetic strains. Some research suggests that wild strains benefit wildlife to a greater extent than cultivated strains of the same species. Some research also suggests that local genetic strains of certain species are better able to survive local soil, climate, disease and competitive conditions than more distant genetic strains. Woody plantings can be installed as ball & burlap, container, or bare root stock. Direct seeding can be used as well, such as planting of acorns. Protection from rodent and deer browsing may be warranted. Woody species, stock availability, season of planting, browsing pressure, and installation and maintenance budget will influence the best stock and planting techniques to use. Native trees and shrubs appropriate for buffer screening and native landscaping at Braemar Park are provided in Figure 7. Asterisks denote species most appropriate for buffer screening within the woodlands along the edge of the golf course and on the southeast edge of the park. Figure 8 depicts where native buffers will be used. d) Install diverse, native species. Once invasive woody brush is under control, installation of diverse, native COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME Canopy Trees Black Maple* Acer nigrum Red Maple Acer rubrum Sugar Maple* Acer saccharum River Birch Betula nigra Hackberry* Celtis occidentalis Eastern Red Cedar* Juniperus virginiana White Spruce Picea glauca Eastern White Pine Pinus strobus Big-toothed Aspen Populus grandidentata Quaking Aspen Populus tremuloides Black Cherry* Prunus serotina Swamp White Oak Quercus bicolor Northern Pin Oak Quercus ellipsoidalis Bur Oak Quercus macrocarpa Red Oak Quercus rubra Eastern White Cedar Thuja occidentalis Basswood Tilia americana Figure 7: Native Trees and Shrubs for Woodland Buffer Screening(*) and Native Landscaping. COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME Subcanopy Trees and Shrubs Low Serviceberry Amelanchier humilis Smooth Serviceberry Amelanchier laevis Black Chokeberry Aronia melanocarpa Pagoda Dogwood* Cornus alternifolia Gray Dogwood* Cornus racemosa Red-twig Dogwood Cornus sericea American Hazelnut* Corylus americana Fireberry Hawthorn Crataegus chrysocarpa Fleshy Hawthorn Crataegus succulenta Bush Honeysuckle Diervilla lonicera Witch Hazel Hamamelis virginiana Winterberry Ilex verticillata Ironwood* Ostrya virginiana Ninebark Physocarpus opulifolius Wild Plum Prunus americana Chokecherry* Prunus virginiana Smooth Sumac Rhus glabra Smooth Rose Rosa blanda Prairie Willow Salix humilis Red-berried Elder* Sambucus racemosa (pubens) American Mountain Ash Sorbus americana Southern Arrowroot Viburnum dentatum Nannyberry Viburnum lentago Highbush Cranberry Viburnum opulus var. americanum (trilobum) * Most appropriate for buffer screening within woodlands. species will help prevent re-invasion, stabilize soils, provide attractive blooms and berries, and provide improved habitat for more native species. In addition to buffer screening plantings discussed above, additional live woody and herbaceous plantings and seeding can be used to increase native cover and diversity. Plantings should be designed to achieve the desired native plant community, including appropriate dominant species in each stratum (i.e., canopy, subcanopy, shrub/sapling, and ground layer species) as well as other species appropriate for the plant community. The MnDNR’s Field Guide to the Native Plant Communities of Minnesota: The Eastern Broadleaf Forest Province (MnDNR 2005) is useful for selecting species appropriate for particular native plant communities. For Braemar Park’s woodlands, see the description and species list for FDs37 Southern Dry-Mesic Oak (Maple) Woodland (see Appendix B). e) Conduct perpetual monitoring and adaptive management. As with all natural areas, perpetual monitoring and management will be required to address ongoing pressure by invasive species and other issues that warrant intervention (e.g., dumping, erosion). Ecological monitoring should be conducted annually (more frequently immediately following restoration and management actions), and management should be conducted as needed. It is estimated that annual natural resource management will cost $200-$400 per acre per year for a three year time period after initial restorations. More detailed/quantitative monitoring is beneficial for more accurate tracking of trends and to better guide adaptive management; such monitoring should be conducted every three to five years. Priority #2a – Establish Prairie Beds Because they will have high visibility and have high restoration potential, these areas (i.e., upland herbaceous areas on east-central and southeast edges of the golf course) should be restored. This should entail the following tasks: a) Remove invasive herbaceous vegetation b) Install diverse, native species c) Conduct perpetual monitoring and adaptive management (see Priority #1 above) a) Remove invasive herbaceous vegetation. Initial preparation of the planting bed will likely warrant multiple treatments with broadcast herbicide to remove invasive species and other weeds. It is critical to establish good weed control prior to installing native seed, or it is likely the resulting prairie will be of poor quality and/or a management burden. b) Install diverse, native species. Following appropriate weed removal and soil preparation, install one or a combination of the following State of Minnesota Seed Mixes (see Appendix C): »35-541 Mesic Prairie Southwest »36-211 Woodland Edge South & West Mix (when near woodland edge) »Beneficial Insects South West (pilot seed mix) »Little Bluestem Urban Prairie (pilot seed mix) »Mesic Short Urban Buffer South West (pilot seed mix) »Pollinator Plot Urban Southeast (pilot seed mix) Priority #2b – Restore Small Oak Woodlands Similar to Priority #1, these smaller areas of oak woodland should be restored. This should entail the following tasks: a) Remove invasive woody vegetation (see Priority #1 above) b) Remove invasive herbaceous vegetation (see Priority #1 above) c) Install diverse, native species (see Priority #1 above) d) Conduct perpetual monitoring and adaptive management (see Priority #1 above) Priority #3a – Restore South Wetland Complex Because the proposed pedestrian trail will pass through it, the southern wetland complex (at least sections near the trail) should be restored. This should entail the following tasks: City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan44 45 Key to map Native Vegetation Buffer Restoration Priority# 1 1 3a Figure 8: Natural Resource Restoration Prioritiesa) Remove invasive woody vegetation (see Priority #1 above, but only aquatic-approved herbicides should be used in wetlands or near open water) b) Remove invasive herbaceous vegetation (see Priorities #1 and #2 above, but only aquatic- approved herbicides should be used in wetlands or near open water) c) Install diverse, native species d) Conduct perpetual monitoring and adaptive management (see Priority #1 above, but only aquatic-approved herbicides should be used in wetlands or near open water) c) Install diverse, native species. Due to the variability of this wetland complex (shade, soil type, moisture regimes, etc.), appropriate species and type of propagule (e.g., seed, live planting) will need to be selected on an area-specific basis. The MnDNR’s Field Guide to the Native Plant Communities of Minnesota: The Eastern Broadleaf Forest Province (MnDNR 2005) is useful for selecting species appropriate for particular native plant communities, and State of Minnesota Seed Mixes can be used as well. Priority #3b – Restore North Wetland Complex Because Braemar Blvd passes through it, the northern wetland complex (at least sections near the road) should be restored. This should entail the following tasks: a) Remove invasive woody vegetation (see Priority #1 above, but only aquatic-approved herbicides should be used in wetlands or near open water) b) Remove invasive herbaceous vegetation (see Priorities #1 and #2 above, but only aquatic- approved herbicides should be used in wetlands or near open water) c) Install diverse, native species (see Priority #3a above) d) Conduct perpetual monitoring and adaptive management (see Priority #1 above, but only aquatic-approved herbicides should be used in wetlands or near open water) 1 2a 2a 2b 2b 3b 2b City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan46 47 IMPLEMENTATION5PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan City of Edina Braemar Park Master Plan48 49 Preliminary Cost Estimate The following preliminary cost estimates has been prepared identifying proposed trail and site improvements to be implemented in the park. Additional design and survey investigation will be required to determine more accurate cost estimates and funding needs for construction. Additional stakeholder partners may also need to be identified to assist with funding identified improvements. Braemar Boulevard/Hillary Lane Parkway Conversion $3,161,500 Removals 6,550 LF $15 $98,250 Bituminous paving, storm sewer, curb and gutter 6,550 LF $225 $1,473,750 10' wide bituminous parkway trail 6,550 LF $140 $917,000 Stormwater treatment and conveyance 1 LS $100,000 $100,000 Pedestrian scale lighting 65 EA $7,500 $487,500 Wayfinding and roadway signage 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 Site restoration and landscape improvements 1 LS $75,000 $75,000 Courtney Fields Site and Parking Lot Improvements $1,925,070 New LED lighting and electrical - (Premier field #1 only)1 LS $300,000 $300,000 Premier field grandstand 1 LS $665,000 $665,000 Premier field sideline netting 1 LS $50,000 $50,000 Premier right outfield spectator bench seating 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 Play area and picnic shelter 1 LS $250,000 $250,000 Turn around drop off area and wayfinding kiosk 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 Permeable paving parking lot bays 38,400 SF $10 $384,000 Saw cut bituminous pavement 2,130 LF $2 $4,260 Remove bituminous pavement 1,422 SY $5 $7,110 Shade trees/landscape improvements 25 LS 700 $17,500 Bitumninous loop trail 1,480 LF $140 $207,200 Pedestrian Hiking Trail Improvements $612,000 Class 2 gravel hiking trail 8,975 LF $20 $179,500 Relocate and reinstall existing pedestrian bridge and footings 1 LS $20,000 $20,000 Remove existing plastic boardwalk 700 LF $5 $3,500 New 12' wide boardwalk 910 LF $400 $364,000 Picnic shelter and seating overlook 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 Wayfinding signage 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 Site restoration 1 LS $20,000 $20,000 Braemar Park Master Plan Preliminary Cost Estimate 11/30/2017 City of Edina Mountain Bike Trail Improvements $229,584 Mountain bike trail system 28,512 LF $7 $199,584 Golf course trailhead improvements (kiosk, bike racks, and drinking water) 1 LS $20,000 $20,000 Wayfinding signage 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 Site restoration 1 LS $20,000 $20,000 Braemar Golf Course Parking Lot and Site Improvements $1,267,102 Site removals 1 LS $25,000 $25,000 Parking lot reconfiguration and grading 1 LS $250,000 $250,000 Turn around, drop-off, and entry plaza 1 LS $60,000 $60,000 Permeable paving parking bays 66,315 SF $10 $663,150 Saw cut bituminous pavement 3,836 LF $2 $7,672 Remove bituminous pavement 2,456 SY $5 $12,280 Pickleball courts 2 EA $12,000 $24,000 Platform tennis courts with lighting 2 EA $75,000 $150,000 Site restoration and landscape improvements 1 LS $75,000 $75,000 Braemar Arena Site, Parking, and Building Improvements $929,695 Permeable paving parking bays 70,875 SF $10 $708,750 Saw cut bituminous pavement 3,910 LF $2 $7,820 Remove bituminous pavement 2,625 SY $5 $13,125 Tree and landscape improvements 1 LS $50,000 $50,000 Arena building facade and signage improvements 1 LS $150,000 $150,000 Natural Resource Improvements $547,000 *Oak woodland restoration 65 AC $4,000 $260,000 *Oak savanna restoration 8 AC $3,000 $24,000 *Wooded wetland restoration 48 AC $2,500 $120,000 *Herbaceous wetland restoration 28 AC $2,500 $70,000 *Prairie restoration 9 AC $2,000 $18,000 *Native vegetation buffering 15 AC $3,000 $45,000 Natural resource interpretative signage 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 Estimated Subtotal $6,499,154 25% Contingency, Design, and Administration $1,624,789 **Total Estimated Construction Costs $8,123,943 *Natural resource improvements will also require 3 years of follow up maintenance of $200-$400 per acre per year. **Add 5% inflation cost for construction every year beyond 2017. Date: April 10, 2018 Agenda Item #: VI.D. To:Parks and Recreation Commission Item Type: Report and Recommendation From:Greg Good, Parks & Recreation Commission Chair Item Activity: Subject:Comprehensive Plan Update Discussion, Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None INTRODUCTION: Please review and plan to provide feedback for the latest version of the Park's chapter of the comprehensive plan. ATTACHMENTS: Description DRAFT PARC Comprehensive Plan 4-18 1 2018 Comp Plan – Edina Park & Recreation Department (EPRD) Draft (Dated April 4, 2018) A. Introduction / Current conditions Intro to be amended by consultant for cohesion across various chapters of the Comp Plan. (Following draft content is drawn from Introduction section 2.0 of the 2015 Strategic Plan - page 21.) The City of Edina operates one of the most well-regarded parks and recreation systems in the metropolitan Twin Cities. Edina is a first ring suburb of Minneapolis that has been fully developed for a number of years. While there are few opportunities for major expansion or acquisition, the system continues to be improved with targeted additions, partnerships, and innovations in operations. This system, along with numerous programs and collaborations with local youth sports associations, greatly contribute to the quality of life in the City of Edina. The Vision of EPRD is “To be recognized as having Minnesota’s premiere parks, recreation and trails system that provides unrivaled opportunities to maximize Edina’s quality of life by nurturing the health and well-being of our people, our community, our environment and our economy.” In fulfillment of that vision, the EPRD Mission Statement is “To create parks, facilities and programs to foster a healthy inclusive community. We accomplish this through creative leadership, collaborations, environmentally sustainable practices and the responsible use of available resources.” Currently, the EPRD oversees 43 parks and open spaces totaling more than 1,550 acres, and operates 9 facilities, which include the Edina Aquatic Center, Art Center, Braemar Ice Arena and Sports Dome, Braemar Golf Courses, Braemar Golf Dome, Centennial Lakes Park, Edinborough Park, Arneson Acres Park, and the Edina Senior 2 Center. Park amenities include baseball and softball diamonds; football, soccer and lacrosse fields; basketball, tennis, pickle ball and bocce ball courts; outdoor skating rinks; playground equipment for young children, including an adaptive playground; a community garden; and both winter warming houses and summer picnic shelters. The Department also maintains over eight miles of scenic pathways for bicycling, walking, jogging, cross-country skiing, snowshoeing and soon mountain biking. In 2015, the EPRD completed a Strategic Plan to guide priorities, plans and decisions over the next 10+ years. Our 2018 Comprehensive Plan is structured around the five key Development Areas from that 2015 Strategic Plan. Content in the Comp Plan is structured as policy statements, with action items applicable to policies. B. Natural Resources and Sustainable Parks Intent: Protect, enhance, engage and restore our urban forests, natural areas and water resources to sustain a healthy, diverse and balanced natural environment for all to enjoy and understand. a. Every new Master Park Plan in Edina will include a section on how to best promote, improve or maintain our natural resources. i. Action: Establish a Natural Resources Conservation and Management Plan focused on natural resources, shorelines and wildlife habitat. Include in near term (first 1-3 years) annual action plan. Recommend appropriate budget to accomplish. 3 ii. Action: All park plans will include an examination of energy use, water runoff and management, solid waste management and invasive species control. b. Control of invasive species will remain an important priority in maintenance planning across city owned property. i. Action: Prioritize the deployment of educational content to our community on how to recognize and eradicate invasive species on private property. ii. Action: Dedicate funding for the accomplishment of this policy. c. Wildlife will be nurtured and protected. Animal and bird populations that are considered a threat to public health or safety, or may be considered hazardous to the environment or infrastructure within Edina, will be proactively managed. The Edina Police Department owns the accountability to provide this service to the community. It is the intent of the EPRD to support this effort as it impacts wildlife as a natural resource. i. Action: Develop awareness of the list of species to be considered to ensure a balanced approach in this area: Pollinators, coyotes, turkeys, geese, rabbits, etc. ii. Action: Partner with the Edina Police Department to clearly understand the role EPRD can play to develop, communicate and execute a plan to manage select species. iii. Action: Establish metrics to track progress. Partner with surrounding communities to engage in best practices and share resources. d. Exhibit leadership in the area of sustainability in our park system to support the health of our parks and open spaces. 4 i. Action: Participate in local, regional or national efforts to better understand the impact of climate change. ii. Action: Develop a sustainability scorecard to guide meaningful actions to protect Edina’s green assets. iii. Action: Consider GHG (Greenhouse Gas) impact by reviewing options to utilize solar power on playing field or ice rink lights, as well as making facility roofs solar panel ready. iv. Action: Emphasize recycling in our parks and enterprise facilities. C. Parks, Open Spaces and Trails Intent: Ensure parks are a source of community pride by providing a balance of active and passive spaces that are well connected and reflect high quality design principles and maintenance standards; that allow residents to engage in healthy activities. a. Devote a minimum of 15% of Edina’s land area to parkland and open space. i. Action: Match increasing density of commercial and residential growth with the creation of new parks and open spaces, or connections to existing nearby parks. b. Edina’s park assets are improved when they connect to neighboring communities, as well as individual interior and regional trails within the City. i. Action: Develop the concept of the “Grand Rounds” that will connect all quadrants of Edina via well- developed walking / biking trails. 5 ii. Action: Work with Transportation Commission to consider an Edina public transport circulator electric bus. c. Walking and Biking trails are a community priority and should be part of any new or revised Park Master Plan with the intent to maximize when feasible. i. Action: Work to meet NRPA guidelines that indicate a need for 15-20 miles of additional trails. ii. Action: Ensure that the diversity of our community is addressed through trails accessible for seniors, youth and people with disabilities. iii. Action: Consider the community interest in exercise/fitness or additional nature trails, in addition to existing walking and biking trails. d. All parks designated Community or Special Use to have an updated Master Plan every ten years to guide use, growth, improvements and new development. i. Action: Evaluate and prioritize parkland designated as Community Park space when increasing parkland. ii. Action: Consider additional multi-purpose athletic fields when evaluating future growth or utilization of parks and green space. e. The City of Edina intends to promote “neighborhood nodes” that become focal points for community activity. i. Action: Review how community gardens in our parks and green spaces would help support this policy. ii. Action: Proactively engage neighborhood associations in planning and upkeep of associated parks and green space. 6 iii. Action: Work toward providing a park or green space within one mile walking distance to all residents in Edina. f. It is the preference of the City to maintain and, when feasible, increase its current park and open space property. Situations may arise where the sale, swap or disposal of such property is deemed in the best interest of the City. Any such opportunity will be treated on a case by case basis. g. ERPD will be intentional to add works of art that are carefully integrated into parks and open spaces. i. Action: Work collaboratively with the Arts and Culture Commission and Public Art Edina to develop and execute a plan that adds art to enhance these public spaces. D. Recreation Facilities Intent: Provide safe, clean and reliable facilities and program spaces that provide users the highest level of value which support their health and wellness, while supporting financial sustainability for the City in the future. a. EPRD will maximize the use of enterprise facilities primarily, but not exclusively, for Edina residents. b. Enterprise assets are intended to be fee-based revenue generating facilities supporting programs that collectively cover all expenses, including capital investments, land purchases and all operating expense. c. Exhibit leadership in matching facility space and utilization with the future needs of our community. i. Action: Assess NRPA guidelines that indicate our community “need” for an additional 60,000 square 7 feet of facility space, such as an activity center to support both winter and year round recreational programs. ii. Action: Ensure bathroom facilities meet the needs of community users and are ADA compliant. E. Recreation Programs Intent: Develop, provide and manage recreation programs to support the community’s need for health and wellness, individual skill development, and community connectivity in a safe and enjoyable environment. a. Recreation programs will emphasize Edina as a learning community. b. Recreation programs will exhibit a balance of inclusion across generations, skills, economic conditions and seasons. c. Recreation programs will include aspects of art, culture, health, sustainability and also support unstructured recreation. d. Prioritize program development focused on enhancing health and activity for all ages, while providing special consideration for our youth population. e. The majority of our recreation programs are intended to be fee-based, in alignment with segmented value and populations served. Full recovery of all expenses is not necessarily expected. F. Finance and Management Intent: Provide and encourage use of parks, trails, facilities, and programs that deliver on the community’s expectations for a safe and 8 enjoyable experience while keeping the infrastructure of the system in a quality state. a. EPRD provides a high level of park maintenance to achieve all aspects of our EPRD vision. i. Action: Develop plans, budgets and services to execute required activity. ii. Action: Maintain or replace existing park infrastructure in a timely, cost effective manner. b. Partnerships will be explored and utilized when appropriate to provide new services or facilities to Edina residents. i. Action: Explore partnerships within five miles of Edina that would offer access to additional outdoor athletic fields. ii. Action: Explore partnerships to expand indoor exercise and fitness facilities for Edina residents. iii. Action: Partner with the Edina School System in order to best utilize facility, field and program assets to meet community needs. c. EPRD is open to novel and unique ideas and opportunities to enhance financial leverage. i. Action: Explore alternative funding to support growth and accomplish our objectives (mission). d. EPRD is committed to ensuring its plans, programs and facilities consider Inclusion and Diversity across a broad range of implications to our community. e. When planning and making improvements, EPRD will consider impact to the brands of both the City of Edina and its park system. 9 i. Action: Prioritize the use of web-based applications and communications in how we engage and communicate with our community. ii. Action: Evaluate adding Wi-Fi connectivity to all parks and enterprise facilities. f. EPRD will build strong connections with established neighborhood organizations to best understand and serve specific needs in those areas (nodes). g. To ensure transparency, accountability and sustainability of Edina assets, Enterprise facilities will renew long term business plans every third year for presentation to the PARC and approval by the Edina City Council. Annual reviews of performance against plan will be conducted by EPRD staff and a small PARC working group, appropriate with the end of each Enterprise facility season. h. Benchmarking will be used to assess progress against our Vision. i. Action: Use benchmarking on the following items to maintain or achieve our strategic objectives: 1. Remain leaders in: a. Park acreage / resident b. Ice sheet facilities c. Operating expense cost recovery 2. Improve comparable position in: a. Trails and total trail mileage b. Capital budget level and funding sources c. Expenditures on planning and development d. Rectangular athletic fields 3. Consider future positioning for: 10 a. Expanding outdoor pavilions and/or picnic space b. Additional dog parks c. Additional volleyball courts d. Additional pickle ball courts e. Splash pads f. Skate parks ii. Action: Conduct benchmarking on a regular basis, at least every 3-5 years, and provide a report and action plan to the City Council. i. EPRD intends to maintain a focus on its Comprehensive Plan by including a 2018 Comp Plan self-audit in its work plan every third year. G. Implementation Plan a. TBD – As needed H. Appendix a. Definitions of park types i. Mini Park (14): 1 acre or less, serving its very close proximity neighbors with an expected service area of 0.25 miles or about a 5-minute walk. ii. Neighborhood Park (9): 1 to 15 acres, serving the immediate neighborhood with an expected service area of 0.5 miles. iii. Community Park (8): 15-40 acres, serving the surrounding community of approximately 1-mile service area. iv. Special Use Park (9): Asset containing specialized and perhaps unique qualities or activities. Intended to 11 serve the broad Edina community and perhaps surrounding communities. b. List of 43 parks and open spaces c. NRPA: National Recreation and Park Association d. Natural resources in this document is considered to be resources that exist without human intervention, such as land, soil, air, water, forests and other vegetation, and wildlife. Date: April 10, 2018 Agenda Item #: VII.A. To:Parks and Recreation Commission Item Type: Other From:Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director Item Activity: Subject:City Council Updates March 20 and April 3, 2018 CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description City Council Updates March 20 and April 3, 2018 City Council Updates By Scott Neal March 20, 2018 • Approved request for purchase for Courtney Field light installation • Approved request for purchase for Courtney Field #1 lights April 3, 2018 • Approved Access Agreement for Morcon Construction at Sherwood Park