Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2020-06-16 City Council Meeting Packet
Agenda City Council Meeting City of Edina, Minnesota VIRTUAL MEETING Make live testimony: 800-374-0221, enter Conference ID 8967019. Testimony for the public hearing can also be made at www.BetterTogetherEdina.org/public-hearings. Watch live meeting: Edina TV (Comcast Channels 813 or 16); Facebook.com/EdinaMN; EdinaMN.gov/LiveMeetings Tuesday, June 16, 2020 7:00 PM I.Call To Order II.Roll Call III.Pledge of Allegiance IV.Approval Of Meeting Agenda V.Community Comment During "Community Comment," the Mayor will invite residents to share issues or concerns that are not scheduled for a future public hearing. Items that are on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. The City Manager will respond to questions raised during Community Comments at the next meeting. A.City Manager's Response to Community Comments VI.Adoption Of Consent Agenda All agenda items listed on the Consent Agenda will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of items unless requested to be removed by a Council Member. If removed the item will be considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve, unless otherwise noted in consent item.) A.Approve Minutes: Emergency May 29, 31 and June 1, Work Session, Regular and Closed June 2, 2020 B.Approve Payment of Claims C.Approve Agreement with Nine Mile Creek Watershed District to Develop Lake Level Management Plans for Arrowhead and Indianhead Lakes D.Resolution No. 2020-68: Resolution Accepting Ownership of Underground Utilities, Streets and Sidewalks E.Request for Purchase: 2020 Sidewalk Improvements F.Request for Purchase: 50th and France Paver Replacements G.Request for Purchase: Edinborough Park Asset & Energy Management Plan H.Resolution 2020-61: Authorizing Contamination Clean Up Grant and Environmental Response Fund Grant Agreements I.Resolution No. 2020-67: Final Plat for 7413 and 7424 York Terrace for Blaz Razul J.Approve 2020-2021 City Insurance Renewals K.Liability Coverage Statutory Limits L.Request for Purchase: 2020 Commodities H2O Treatment Chemicals M.Resolution No. 2020-69: Appointing Election Judges for the August 11 Primary N.Resolution No. 2020-70: Accepting Donations VII.Special Recognitions And Presentations A.Accept Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For Year Ending Dec. 31, 2019 B.Concept for Improved Service and Safety of City Hall Reception Area VIII.Public Hearings During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after staF and/or applicants make their presentations. The following guidelines are in place to ensure an eHcient, fair, and respectful hearing; limit your testimony to three minutes and to the matter under consideration; the Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary; avoid repeating remarks or points of view made by previous speakers. The use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A.PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No 2020-60 Variance Appeal for 4248 Alden Drive B.PUBLIC HEARING: Ordinance No. 2020-04 and Resolution No. 2020-63 and 2020-64 Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Preliminary Rezoning for 5132 and 5136-48 Hankerson Avenue for Donnay Homes C.PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2020-66 Subdivision with Variances at 5928 Abbott Avenue South for Second Story Build D.PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2020-65 Parking Stall Variance and Site Plan for M Health at 6401 France Avenue IX.Reports/Recommendations: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A.Resolution No. 2020-58: Variance Appeal for Cellular Antenna Tower B.Resolution No. 2020-62: Calling a Public Hearing on the Proposed Conveyance of City Owned Property to the Edina Housing Foundation C.Resolution No. 2020-57: Approving Right-of-Way Easement Vacation at Oak Lane and Garden Avenue D.Ordinance No. 2020-08: Amending Chapter 12 of Edina City Code Concerning Tobacco X.Correspondence And Petitions A.Correspondence XI.Aviation Noise Update XII.Mayor And Council Comments XIII.Manager's Comments A.Announce Members of the Street Funding Task Force XIV.Calendar of City Council Meetings and Events XV.Adjournment The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing ampliKcation, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Date: June 16, 2020 Agenda Item #: V.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:City Manager's Response to Community Comments Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: City Manager Neal will respond to questions asked at the previous council meeting. Date: June 16, 2020 Agenda Item #: VI.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Approve Minutes: Emergency May 29, 31 and June 1, Work Session, Regular and Closed June 2, 2020 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve minutes as presented. INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Minutes: Draft Emergency, May 29, 3 p.m. Minutes: Draft Emergency, May 29, 6 p.m. Minutes: Draft Emergency, May 31 Minutes: Draft Emergency, June 1 Minutes: Draft Regular, June 2 Minutes: Draft Closed, June 2 Minutes: Draft Work Session, June 2 MINUTES OF THE CLOSED EMERGENCY MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL VIRTUAL MEETING FRIDAY, MAY 29, 2020 3:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 3:08 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members Anderson, Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, and Mayor Hovland. Staff in attendance: Scott Neal, City Manager; Lisa Schaefer, Assistant City Manager; Chief David Nelson, Chief Tom Schmitz; Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications Director; Jennifer Garske, Executive Assistant, and Sharon Allison, City Clerk. City Attorney in attendance: Roger Knutson III. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Fischer, to approve the meeting agenda. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. IV. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS IV.A. MOTION TO CLOSE SESSION: As permitted by MS 13D.05, Subd. 3(d) for Preparation for Anticipated Civil Disorder Member Anderson made a motion, seconded by Member Fischer to close the meeting as permitted by MS 13D.05, Subd. 3(d) for Preparation for Anticipated Civil Disorder. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. IV.B. PREPARATION FOR ANTICIPATED CIVIL DISORDER Council and staff discussed preparing for anticipated civil disorder as it related to Governor Tim Walz’s Executive Order 20-65. IV. C. MOTION TO MOVE BACK INTO OPEN SESSION Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Fischer to move back into open session. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 3:59 p.m. Edina City Council Closed Emergency Meeting, May 29, 2020, 3:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ____________________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk Minutes approved by the Edina City Council, June 16, 2020. ___________________________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor MINUTES OF THE CLOSED EMERGENCY MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL VIRTUAL MEETING FRIDAY, MAY 29, 2020 6:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 6:01 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members Anderson, Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, and Mayor Hovland. Staff in attendance: Scott Neal, City Manager; Lisa Schaefer, Assistant City Manager; Chief David Nelson, Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications Director; Jennifer Garske, Executive Assistant, and Sharon Allison, City Clerk. III. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to approve the meeting agenda. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. IV. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS IV.A. MOTION TO CLOSE SESSION: As permitted by MS 13D.05, Subd. 3(d) to discuss the potential issuance of a Curfew Order as authorized by Governor Tim Walz Member Anderson made a motion, seconded by Member Staunton to close the meeting as permitted by MS 13D.05, Subd. 3(d) to discuss the potential issuance of a Curfew Order as authorized by Governor Tim Walz. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. IV.B. POTENTIAL ISSUANCE OF A CURFEW ORDER Council and staff discussed potential issuance of a Curfew Order as authorized by Governor Tim Walz. IV. C. MOTION TO MOVE BACK INTO OPEN SESSION Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Anderson to move back into open session. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. IV.D. POTENTIAL ISSUANCE OF A CURFEW ORDER Member Anderson made a motion, seconded by Member Staunton to adopt a curfew consistent with Governor Tim Walz’s Executive Order 20-65. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. Edina City Council Closed Emergency Meeting, May 29, 2020, 6:00 p.m. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:18 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ____________________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk Minutes approved by the Edina City Council, June 16, 2020. ___________________________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor MINUTES OF THE CLOSED EMERGENCY MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL VIRTUAL MEETING SUNDAY, MAY 31, 2020 1:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 1:01 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members Anderson, Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, and Mayor Hovland. Staff in attendance: Scott Neal, City Manager; Chief David Nelson, Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications Director; Jennifer Garske, Executive Assistant, and Sharon Allison, City Clerk. III. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Anderson made a motion, seconded by Member Fischer, to approve the meeting agenda. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. IV. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS IV.A. MOTION TO CLOSE SESSION: As permitted by MS 13D.05, Subd. 3(d) to discuss extension of emergency nighttime curfew order as authorized by Governor Tim Walz Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Fischer to close the meeting as permitted by MS 13D.05, Subd. 3(d) to discuss extension of emergency nighttime curfew order as authorized by Governor Tim Walz. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. IV.B. DISCUSS EXTENSION OF NIGHTTIME CURFEW ORDER AS AUTHORIZED BY GOVERNOR TIM WALZ Council and staff discussed extension of nighttime curfew order as authorized by Governor Tim Walz. IV. C. MOTION TO MOVE BACK INTO OPEN SESSION Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Anderson to move back into open session. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. IV.D. EXTENSION OF EMERGENCY NIGHTTIME CURFEW ORDER Member Anderson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle to extend the curfew order to 8 p.m., Sunday, May 31 to 6 a.m., Monday, June 1, consistent with Governor Tim Walz’s Executive Order 20- 68. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Hovland Edina City Council Closed Emergency Meeting, May 31, 2020 Motion carried. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 1:22 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ____________________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk Minutes approved by the Edina City Council, June 16, 2020. ___________________________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor MINUTES OF THE CLOSED EMERGENCY MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL VIRTUAL MEETING MONDAY, JUNE 1, 2020 2:45 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 2:46 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members Anderson, Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, and Mayor Hovland. Staff in attendance: Scott Neal, City Manager; Chief David Nelson, Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications Director; Jennifer Garske, Executive Assistant, and Sharon Allison, City Clerk. III. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Fischer, to approve the meeting agenda. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. IV. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS IV.A. MOTION TO CLOSE SESSION: As permitted by MS 13D.05, Subd. 3(d) to discuss extension of emergency nighttime curfew order as authorized by Governor Tim Walz Member Fischer made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle to close the meeting as permitted by MS 13D.05, Subd. 3(d) to discuss extension of emergency nighttime curfew order as authorized by Governor Tim Walz. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. IV.B. DISCUSS EXTENSION OF NIGHTTIME CURFEW ORDER AS AUTHORIZED BY GOVERNOR TIM WALZ Council and staff discussed extension of nighttime curfew order as authorized by Governor Tim Walz. IV. C. MOTION TO MOVE BACK INTO OPEN SESSION Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Fischer to move back into open session. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. IV.D. EXTENSION OF EMERGENCY NIGHTTIME CURFEW ORDER Member Fischer made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle to extend the curfew order to 10 p.m., Monday, June 1 to Wednesday morning, June 3, consistent with Governor Tim Walz’s Executive Order 20-69. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Hovland Edina City Council Closed Emergency Meeting, June 1, 2020 Motion carried. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 3:18 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ____________________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk Minutes approved by the Edina City Council, June 16, 2020. ___________________________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor Page 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL VIRTUAL MEETING JUNE 2, 2020 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. and stated the meeting was being held remotely in compliance with Governor Walz’ Stay at Home Order then shared the procedure for public hearing and community comment. II. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Anderson, Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Hovland. Absent: None. III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE IV. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED AS PRESENTED Member Fischer made a motion, seconded by Member Anderson, to approve the meeting agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared. V.A. CITY MANAGER’S RESPONSE TO COMMUNITY COMMENTS Manager Neal shared no Community Comments were made at the last meeting. VI. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED AS PRESENTED Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Staunton, approving the consent agenda as presented: VI.A. Approve minutes of the Worksession and Regular Meetings of May 19, 2020 VI.B. Approve payment claims for Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated May 21-28, 2020 totaling $2,189,745.93 VI.C. Adopt Ordinance No. 2020-06; Amending Chapter 10 of the Edina City Code Concerning Rental Licensing VI.D. Approve Traffic Safety Report of April 28, 2020 VI.E. Request for Purchase; awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, CloverRide Circulator Bus Service, DARTS $25,000 VI.F. Request for Purchase; awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Design Services for West 58th Street Roadway Reconstruction, WSB for $22,243 VI.G. Request for Purchase; awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Natural Areas Maintenance Construction Oversight, Applied Ecological Services for $27,730 VI.H. Approve Special Assessment Agreements and Adopt Resolution No. 2020-55 VI.I. Approve Conservation Easement Over Outlot A VI.J. Approve Site Improvement Plan Agreement with AEON for 4100 West 76th Street VI.K. Adopt Resolution No. 2020-56; Accepting Donations Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. Minutes/Edina City Council/June 2, 2020 Page 2 VII. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS VII.A. CENTERING EQUITY IN CITY’S RESPONSE TO THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC – PROCLAIMED Mayor Hovland read in full a proclamation to declare the affirmation of the City of Edina’s commitment to centering racial equity in its response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Race & Equity Coordinator Lee stated Richfield and Bloomington had also adopted this as sign of partnership and community to think about the racial disparities exposed due to COVID-19. She thanked the City for affirming this unified proclamation that highlighted the many impacted people both globally and in Minnesota and as the COVID-19 pandemic continued the awareness that Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) communities were disproportionately affected by the pandemic. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Anderson, approving the proclamation declaring affirmation of the City of Edina’s commitment to centering racial equity in its response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD – Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. VIII.A. RESOLUTION NO. 2020-57; APPROVING STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT VACATION AT OAK LANE AND GARDEN AVENUE – CONTINUED TO JUNE 16, 2020 Director of Engineering Millner stated Richard and Lisa Bale and Steve and Kelly Housh had applied for a vacation of the street’s right-of-way easement at Oak Lane and Garden Avenue. Sidewalk, trail, drainage and utility right-of-way easements shall remain. He spoke about information discovered earlier in the day on two options that included vacating the entire right-of-way except for a certain portion or require new easement documents from each owner for a sidewalk, trailway, drainage, and utility purposes. He said staff would finalize recommendations by June 16 with the goal to retain the area for a future road. The Council asked about property ownership clarification, the two parcels all having access from Benton Street, and not removing access. The Council also asked if the family would subdivide and create lots north, if there was a house at 5420 that would need variances approved. Community Development Director Teague said the property owners could combine to make one lot that could meet the standards and retain access from Garden Avenue with 40-foot frontage with a vacation. Mr. Millner confirmed four properties on Benton Avenue signed the petition of vacation. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:31 p.m. Public Testimony Steve Housh, addressed the Council. Melvin Songstad, 5424 Benton Avenue, addressed the Council. Rick Bale, 5805 Oak Lane, addressed the Council. Dennis Zuzek, 5524 Benton Avenue, addressed the Council. Member Brindle moved to extend public hearing to noon June 10, 2020 and continue final action on Resolution No. 2020-57; vacating portions of street right-of-way easement, Oak Lane and Garden Avenue, to the June 16, 2020 meeting. Member Staunton seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. Minutes/Edina City Council/June 2, 2020 Page 3 VIII.B. RESOLUTION NO. 2020-58; VARIANCE APPEAL FOR CELLULAR ANTENNA TOWER – CONTINUED TO JUNE 16, 2020 Assistant Planner Aaker stated Crown Castle USA was requesting a 170.1-foot setback variance from an east lot line of 5200 Doncaster Way/Highlands Park, for a mono-pole cellular telecommunications antenna tower and park light standard replacement to allow for an additional service provider co-location. The proposed project included replacement of the existing park light standard/monopole antenna and the addition of an equipment structure. She said the Planning Commission approved the variance request then spoke about the reason for the request in detail and shared a revised proposal that had fewer visual impacts to the area. The Council thanked the applicant for the design changes then asked about work that went into alternative locations. Tim Barnes, facilities supervisor, responded the tower was needed in the current location to retain power, expand and change the view of the shelter, and ensure the waterfront is enjoyed. He explained their work to preserve the giant oak and consultation with ice rink operations to make a clear path around the ice with no hinderance. He then shared the desire for a light standard on both sides of the rink that was changed due to its proximity to water and additional regulations with the power supply, noting the tennis court was also considered. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:12 p.m. Public Testimony John Mertes, 5209 Doncaster Way, addressed the Council. Jenny Beamish, 5236 Lochloy Drive, addressed the Council. Cindy Anderson, 5201 Doncaster Way, addressed the Council. Sue Punch Hess, 5237 Lochloy Drive, addressed the Council. Howard Roston, Fredrickson and Bryon, thanked staff for their work over this two-year process in evaluating the existing structure and the best place for a new structure by Crown Castle. He reviewed the proposed pole of 75 feet would replace a 58-foot pole and double as a lighting standard for the ice rink. He spoke about the appropriate location for this pole both by them and City staff and the City policy of co-location that filled the need for connectivity for the public and first responders. He noted more than 50% of households in Minnesota relied solely on cell phones for connectivity and data, especially now as more people worked from home so connectivity was not merely a convenience. Mr. Roston spoke about public sentiment and an open process and explained that health concerns raised were not backed by reliable science. He noted that while there was preemption language in the federal telecommunications act about allowing such poles, it was also based on standards and the variance should be granted. Travis Shank, Crown Castle, thanked the City for the opportunity to speak about the need for a balance for RF needs and a structure that was the least intrusive. He said the location towards the rear of park by the lake would have been more impactful on the park and the community due to the requirement to have an access road and separation from the pole. The Council also asked for data on the percent of improvement based on a specific height. The Council spoke about the accessway and an alternative to place the tower by the existing equipment or other parks. Mr. Shank said if moved 200 feet, the pole would be close to the existing tree line and trees create barriers to RF. He said they started with an 80-foot tower but were able to decrease the height by 5 feet and still maintain reliability. Mr. Shank spoke about vegetation concerns if left in the current location and about the heaviness of equipment needed for construction and how the drive path was not as significant in this area. He said they did not explore other parks because the existing tower was already in place and in the middle of a significant gap in coverage. Minutes/Edina City Council/June 2, 2020 Page 4 The Council confirmed this was the optimal location but understood the concerns raised during the public testimony regarding health and safety for children and families. The Council referred to information from the European Commission, United Kingdom, Norway, and Sweden that explored the health effects with 5G technology and asked about health concerns balanced against the need for greater coverage. Mr. Shank stated according to published research, there were no health concerns from the tower. He referred to the submitted health data for Council consideration. The Council said they liked the co-location and pulling part of the array closer to the tower. The Council noted the fence around the tower base, then requested further information on alternative tower and equipment locations. The Council asked questions about tree coverage, noting the T-Mobile portion of the tower would be no higher than it currently was, trees would continue to grow, and steps needed to ensure continued good service. Mr. Shank said the fence was not standard but with the compounded equipment located in a separate spot, the fence would protect the ground equipment. He noted the tower would significantly improve coverage for residents, first responders, and the school district and confirmed that as the trees grew, the equipment could be moved along the tower to continue coverage. Member Brindle moved to extend public hearing to noon June 10, 2020 and continue final action on Resolution No. 2020-58; approving a 170.1-foot setback variance at 5200 Doncaster Way, to the June 16, 2020 meeting. Member Fischer seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. IX. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS IX.A. RESOLUTION NO. 2020-59; AWARDING THE SALE OF $5,220,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS SERIES 2020A – ADOPTED Finance Director Uram shared issuance of the City's General Obligation Bonds, Series 2020A had three purposes including $390,000 - local street improvements paid from special assessments over 15 yrs., $3,930,000 - for water/sewer utility improvements paid from utility system revenues over 10 yrs., and $900,000 - storm utility improvements paid from storm sewer system revenues over 10 yrs. He said bids were received and tabulated by the City's financial advisor, Ehlers & Associates, Inc. earlier in the day and the results were excellent. Mr. Uram explained how the City’s bond ratings from both Moody's and S&P of AAA ratings helped with those results. Nick Anhut, Ehlers and Associates, provided the favorable bids based on City’s excellent credit rating and said of the eight bids received, Piper Sandler & Company from Minneapolis was the low bid at 1.0208% with a high bid of 1.3441% which resulted in an interest difference of $133,555. He stated closing would occur on June 25, 2020. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2020-59; authorizing issuance, awarding sale, prescribing the form and details and providing for the payment of $5,220,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2020A. Member Fischer seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Hovland. Motion carried. IX.B. ORDINANCE 2020-08; AMENDING CHAPTER 12 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING TOBACCO – FIRST READING HELD Community Health Administrator Brown stated the Edina Community Health Commission submitted an advisory communication and staff report recommending action to ban the sale of flavored tobacco related products in the City of Edina to City Council on December 17, 2019. The ordinance would accept this recommendation and amend City code to ban the sale of flavored tobacco products in the City of Edina, would include traditional tobacco and vaping products definitions of cigarettes, cigars, chewing tobacco, and vaping products, and prohibit the sale effective September 1, 2020. Minutes/Edina City Council/June 2, 2020 Page 5 The Council spoke about how the Tobacco 21 process included a public hearing and whether this topic should include a hearing as well to provide more opportunity for a dialogue for a good decision. The Council asked about discussions with retailers who did not have a chance to present their argument and how information was presented to them. Mr. Neal said staff generally does not schedule public hearings for items that do not require a public hearing by Code or Statute, but certainly staff could arrange for a hearing. He said tobacco topics involved many interest groups and lobbyists and communication is monitored by groups early on at the Commission level. Member Brindle made a motion to grant First Reading to Ordinance No. 2020-52 Amending Chapter 12 of the Edina City Code Concerning Tobacco. Member Staunton seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Staunton, Hovland. Absent for vote: Fischer Motion carried. IX.C. RESOLUTION NO. 2020-52; PRELIMINARY PLAT WITH VARIANCES AT 7413 AND 7425 YORK TERRACE FOR BLAZ RAZUL Mr. Teague said Blaz Razul was proposing to subdivide his properties at 7413 and 7425 York Terrace into three lots. The existing homes on both lots would remain, and a new home would be constructed on the new lot created in between the two existing homes. He outlined the steps needed for this request included a subdivision; lot width variances from 75 feet to 59 and 73 for Lots 1 and 2; lot depth variances from 135 feet to 132 for Lot 1 and to 107 for lots 2 and 3; and lot area variances from 9,962 square feet to 8,909 s.f. for Lot 1, to 8,328 s.f. for Lot 2 and 8,859 s.f. for Lot 3. He said the Planning Commission considered this item at its April 29, 2020 meeting and recommended approval, noting the applicant was agreeable to the condition that would include paving of the current driveway Mr. Teague stated the applicant lived in the house to the south and hoped to live in the home in-between and rent the home to the north. Member Anderson moved adoption of Resolution No. 2020-52 approving Preliminary Plat with Variances at 7413 And 7425 York Terrace for Blaz Razul. Member Staunton seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. IX.D. SKETCH PLAN FOR 4525 VALLEY VIEW ROAD – REVIEWED Mr. Teague stated the Council was asked to provide the applicant non-binding feedback on a potential future redevelopment application for the former New Horizon Day Care site at 4425 Valley View Road. The applicant would tear down the existing one-story day-care building and construct a new three-story, 21-unit market rate apartment with 32 underground parking stalls. The density proposed was consistent with the Comprehensive Plan/Small Area Plan which limited the density to 30 units per acre for this site. The site was currently zoned PCD-1, Planned Commercial District. Multi-family residential uses are conditionally permitted. The request would require a Conditional Use Permit, building height variance from 2 stories to 3 stories, and a front setback variance from 36 feet to 16 feet (patio 2 feet); Side and rear setback variances from 36 to 20 feet; floor area ratio variance from 1.0 to 1.08. Mr. Teague spoke about the proposed height (3 stories) was consistent with the small area plan that suggests a 4-story maximum for this site, the front sidewalk should be revised to a boulevard style sidewalk, how a traffic study would be required, and that the applicant would be required to respond to the city’s Sustainability Questionnaire. He spoke about how the project would be subject to the City’s affordable housing policy and how the applicant would meet the policy either by the buy in provision of $210,000 or including units within the project. Minutes/Edina City Council/June 2, 2020 Page 6 Michael Marguiles, DJR Architectures, outlined further details for the 21-unit apartment building project and said this would be a good addition to the neighborhood that adhered to the Small Area Plan (SAP). He said they were proud to provide parking underneath and noted they already held a virtual community meeting with good attendance and input. Dean Dovolis, DJR Architects, shared an overview of the project that included preserving the tower of trees through the requested variance that allowed the building to be closer to Valley View Road. He then highlighted the front porches that provided a more residential townhome look and neighborhood feel. He spoke about the 2:1 parking ratio, 3-story building, and about including proposed long-term rentals or legacy units of 5-10-year leases. He shared proposed elevations and noted for consistency, the sidewalk was directly attached to the curb with no boulevard because of the two existing buildings. The Council spoke about the great aesthetics and how the building was not too much for the area then spoke about the setback requests, missing the boulevard, and additional guest parking. The Council agreed this was a good use of the property and it liked the balcony design that made the balconies appear to be more part of the building. The Council encouraged the applicants to consider trash pick-up, bicycle use and storage, and the view of mechanical ventilation. The Council indicated it liked the scale and how it addressed the street with the townhouse style and patios for a neighborhood feel. The Council said it was not concerned about the front yard setback and variance requests and noted the need to include affordable housing units. The Council cautioned about the need to respond to neighborhood input during upcoming public hearings. X. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS X.A. CORRESPONDENCE - Received 1. Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council’s receipt of various correspondence. XI. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE – Received XII. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS – Received XIII. MANAGER’S COMMENTS – Received XIV. CALENDAR OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AND EVENTS – Received XV. ADJOURNMENT Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Fischer, to adjourn the meeting at 10:50 p.m. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Sharon Allison, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, June 16, 2020. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the June 2, 2020, meeting available. MINUTES OF THE CLOSED MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL VIRTUAL MEETING Immediately following the regular City Council Meeting TUESDAY, JUNE 2, 2020 7:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 11:05 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members Anderson, Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, and Mayor Hovland. Staff in attendance: Scott Neal, City Manager; Lisa Schaefer, Assistant City Manager; Cary Teague, Community Development Director; Kris Aaker, Assistant Planner; and Sharon Allison, City Clerk. City Attorney Roger Knutson Attorneys Katherine Swenson and John Baker, Greene Espel PLLP III. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Anderson, to approve the meeting agenda. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. IV. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS IV.A. MOTION TO CLOSE SESSION: As permitted by MS 13D.05, Subd. 3(b) for Attorney-Client Privilege Regarding Litigation Chad Holder v. City of Edina Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Fischer to close the meeting as permitted by MS 13D.05, Subd. 3(b) for Attorney-Client Privilege Regarding Litigation Chad Holder v. City of Edina. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. IV.B. LITIGATION UPDATE CHAD HOLDER v. CITY OF EDINA Attorneys Swenson and Baker updated Council on the Chad Holder v. City of Edina litigation. IV. C. MOTION TO MOVE BACK INTO OPEN SESSION Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle to move back into open session. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. IV.D. LITIGATION UPDATE CHAD HOLDER v. CITY OF EDINA Council directed attorneys Swenson and Baker to continue mediation with Mr. Chad Holder. Edina City Council Closed Emergency Meeting, June 2, 2020 ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 11:48 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ____________________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk Minutes approved by the Edina City Council, June 16, 2020. ___________________________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL VIRTUAL MEETING JUNE 2, 2020 5:30 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:32 p.m. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members Anderson, Brindle, Fischer and Staunton and Mayor Hovland. Staff present: Scott Neal, City Manager; Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications Director; Ryan Browning, IT Director; Stephanie Hawkinson, Affordable Housing Development Manager; Cary Teague, Community Development Director; Don Uram, Finance Director; Kris Aaker, Assistant Planner; Jennifer Garske, Executive Assistant; Sharon Allison, City Clerk. JOINT MEETING: EDINA HOUSING FOUNDATION (EHF) Affordable Housing Development Manager Stephanie Hawkinson updated the Council on Affordable Housing Programs, “Stay At Home, in Edina” and 4040 W. 70th Street. Affordable Housing Programs Hawkinson explained that the City has an opportunity purchase a lot to develop as a single-family home for a family in the 80-100 percent area median income ($120,000) and selling it to EHF for $1.00. Hawkinson said housing analysis in Edina showed the average tear-down was valued at $421,000 while the purchase price for the rebuilt was $1.2M, and a study by Maxfield showed that there was a demand for entry level homes. Next steps included vacating right-of-way, platting the lot, selecting a developer, community feedback, design to complement the neighborhood, etc. Staff answered questions of the Council. Council offered support for purchasing the lot. “Stay Home in Edina” Forbearance Program EHF member Mary Kay McNee explained that this new program was designed to help homeowners in the Come Home 2 Edina program who are facing financial difficulties that affect their ability to pay their monthly mortgage because of COVID-19. McNee discussed guidelines of the program which included a maximum loan of $15,000, current on mortgage payment prior to forbearance, etc. The program will be extended to other homeowners. Staff and McNee answered questions of the Council. Council offered support for the program. 4040 W. 70th Street Hawkinson explained that the EHF was the owner of 4040 W. 70 Street and that it would be developed into affordable senior housing using the same process that was used for Amundson Flats, with plans to select a developer later this year. Hawkinson added that Amundson Flats was fully funded, and closing was scheduled for June or July. SINGLE-FAMILY OWNERSHIP PROGRAM Hawkinson stated that West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust (WHAHLT) preserves affordable homeownership opportunities; however, homeownership in Edina has not increased in 16 years. She explained that all of Edina’s block grant fund, typically $120,000, was awarded to WHAHLT, however, this was not enough because the funds are combined and distributed to all of Hennepin County and WHAHLT has a waiting list for homes. Hawkinson recommended a grant fund of $1.3M for the purpose of providing long term affordable ownership opportunities to preserve homeownership by partnering with WHAHLT to acquire, rehab and sell the homes to eligible homeowners. She discussed the goals of the program which preserves long term affordability with access to a line of credit in a revolving loan, sources and uses of the funds, and program process. Hawkinson said this program would help those in the 50-80 percent of area median income. Staff answered questions of Council. Council offered support for the program. SINGLE-FAMILY RENTER PROGRAM Hawkinson explained that there was a need for apartments larger than 2-bedrooms and single-family houses better meets the needs of larger household. She recommended using Southdale 2 TIF funds to purchase single- family homes and partner with Metro HRA to rent and manage maintenance. Terri Smith, Metro HRA, explained that they contract with a management company to manage daily operation and maintenance of 150 sites across the metro area and that they have a waiting list. Staff will continue discussion with Metro HRA and report back in late summer. Hawkinson said this program would help those below 50 percent of area median income. Staff answered questions of Council. Council offered support for the program. EHF members present Jeff Huggett, Mary Kay McNee, Jerry Gilligan, and Bernadette Hornig. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:35 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, __________________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk Minutes approved by the Edina City Council June 16, 2020. __________________________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor Date: June 16, 2020 Agenda Item #: VI.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Claims From:Don Uram, Finance Director Item Activity: Subject:Approve Payment of Claims Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve claims for payment: Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 06.04.20-06.11.20 TOTAL $1,850,210.99 Credit Card Transactions 03.26.20-04.27.20 TOTAL $37,731.58 INTRODUCTION: Claim information for approval is attached. ATTACHMENTS: Description Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 06.04.20-06.11.20 TOTAL $1,850,210.99 Credit Card Transactions 03.26.20-04.27.20 TOTAL $37,731.58 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:36R55CKS2LOGIS100 1Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 6/11/20206/4/2020 - Company Amount 782,783.0401000GENERAL FUND 868.5002300POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 234,188.3302500PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY 6,265.2502700CONSERVATION & SUSTAINABILITY 110,449.8704000WORKING CAPITAL FUND 725.0004100PIR CONSTRUCTION FUND 8,699.2004200EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 541.5905100ART CENTER FUND 46.8005300AQUATIC CENTER FUND 64,434.8205400GOLF COURSE FUND 73,479.8705500ICE ARENA FUND 1,046.6105550SPORTS DOME FUND 10,736.9205700EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 9,318.4905750CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 232,588.1005800LIQUOR FUND 117,845.8705900UTILITY FUND 92,962.1505930STORM SEWER FUND 53,059.6006100EQUIPMENT OPERATIONS ISF 9,952.2106200Information Technology ISF 11,579.3906300FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ISFT 2,774.0907400PSTF AGENCY FUND 4,126.7807500MN TASK FORCE 1 FUND 5,800.0009210HRA ADMINISTRATION 6,678.9009232CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 8,872.1109235VALLEY VIEW/WOODDALE TIF DIST 387.5009240PENTAGON PARK DISTRICT Report Totals 1,850,210.99 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 1Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 447796 6/4/2020 144276 4 FRONT ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC. 62.72 MECH REFUND 80%522150 ED176000-REFUND 1495.4115 MECHANICAL PERMITS INSPECTIONS 62.72 447797 6/4/2020 142327 56 BREWING, LLC 238.00 23145 521988 5610427 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 238.00 447798 6/4/2020 148506 ABBSI, INKEN 265.10 521913 EAC 3631 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 265.10 447799 6/4/2020 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 2.00 23196 522151 2502591 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 58.88 23196 522151 2502591 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.00 23306 522152 2504764 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 82.65 522152 2504764 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 145.53 447800 6/4/2020 148580 ADVISION ECOMMERCE INC 6,900.00 522034 8671 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY 6,900.00 447801 6/4/2020 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 119.18 MONTHLY FIRE EXTINGUISHER INSP 521989 178235 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 119.18 447802 6/4/2020 148584 ALPHA INVESTMENT GROUP LLC 37.41 522153 00124567-034112 1002 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 37.41 447803 6/4/2020 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 440.03 MASKS AND GLOVES FOR CH STAFF 521980 1734-CC7H-GYVR 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 319.40 COVID-19 DISINFECTANT 521991 173M-LMNG-KQGD 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 44.99 REPLACEMENT KEYBOARDS 522035 1HT3-DRVD-C47P 6202.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT I.T. EXPENSES 27.99 FACE MASKS 521910 1LQY-MGDL-NXVH 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 46.13 DOOR HINGE 521981 1LRL-39RH-1KJQ 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 29.99 521972 1MV6-674R-GK6R 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 227.96 WILL BE REIMBURSED BY USSS 521990 1QQF-KCCL-1RAC 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 106.50 521973 1R69-413J-GCVG 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 2Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 447803 6/4/2020 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES Continued... 227.97 HARD DRIVE-USSS TO REIMBURSE 521908 1VQC-TQ44-13V6 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 287.10 521926 1VVJ-Q37W-WD7W 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 1,758.06 447804 6/4/2020 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES INC. 195.99 521975 1004784362 5861.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS VERNON OCCUPANCY 195.04 521974 1004784366 5821.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 311.13 LAUNDRY 522036 1004789889 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 702.16 447805 6/4/2020 102109 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER 868.50 521903 95385 2310.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES E911 868.50 447806 6/4/2020 118491 APPLE INC. 159.00 REPL IPAD KEYBOARD 521955 AC11364737 6202.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT I.T. EXPENSES 159.00 447807 6/4/2020 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 2,220.30 23140 522157 146613 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,472.15 23013 522155 3418698 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 71.20 22975 522154 3418699 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 842.20 23155 522156 3419634 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 966.90 23128 522158 3419637 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6,572.75 447808 6/4/2020 101718 AUTO PLUS - FORMERLY PARTS PLUS 19.76 OIL FILTER 521934 380002637 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 1.54 FUEL FILTER 521932 380002664 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 21.30 447809 6/4/2020 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 737.90 REPLACEMENT BATTIES 521966 P27004163 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 737.90 447810 6/4/2020 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 7.75 23178 522159 84229000 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 981.95 23178 522159 84229000 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 989.70 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 3Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 447811 6/4/2020 141961 BHE COMMUNITY SOLAR LLC Continued... 8,677.95 EP SOLAR GARDEN 522037 10480156 5720.6185 LIGHT & POWER EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 8,677.95 447812 6/4/2020 142153 BLACK STACK BREWING INC. 152.00 23174 522160 8319 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 278.00 23172 522161 8336 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 430.00 447813 6/4/2020 101010 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 924.45 70TH/FRANCE SERVICE LATERAL 521952 920019193 1330.6530 REPAIR PARTS TRAFFIC SIGNALS 924.45 447814 6/4/2020 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 5.25 23099 522164 170495 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 572.00 522164 170495 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7.00 170496 522163 170496 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 528.00 170496 522163 170496 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 843.75 23050 522165 170565 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,956.00 447815 6/4/2020 145301 BOYLAN, ART 75.00 COURTYARD REFUND 521993 GOLF COURSE 5401.4553 CLUBHOUSE GOLF REVENUES 75.00 447816 6/4/2020 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 18.40 23087 522168 1081136772 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,539.78 23087 522168 1081136772 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.15 23185 522166 1081136773 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 17.25 23164 522167 1081136834 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,114.45 23164 522167 1081136834 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8.05 124291 522169 1081136835 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 572.00 124291 522169 1081136835 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.30 23191 522175 1081136837 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 222.00 522175 1081136837 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.15 23109 522176 1081136838 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 58.50 522176 1081136838 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5.17 23094 522174 1081136839 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 800.00 522174 1081136839 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.15 23184 522170 1081136840 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,131.70 23169 522171 1081136841 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 4Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 447816 6/4/2020 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA Continued... 4,628.70 23118 522172 1081136842 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,535.93 23047 522173 1081136843 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 16,657.68 447817 6/4/2020 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER LLC 951.00 23124 522177 1091138365 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 951.00 447818 6/4/2020 100667 BROCK WHITE COMPANY 36.95 522178 13852024-01 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 36.95 447819 6/4/2020 137602 C ALAN HOMES 10,000.00 ESCROW REFUND FROM NEW SFD 522180 ED167702-REFUND 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 ESCROW REFUND FROM DEMO 522179 ED176769-REFUND 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 12,500.00 447820 6/4/2020 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 476.10 23123 522181 2418182 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,703.40 23263 522183 2420387 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,424.30 23275 522182 2420388 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 9.00-2393 522185 625-00722 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 180.60-2395 522184 625-00723 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,414.20 447821 6/4/2020 148582 CARLSON, MICHELE 203.80 522186 00115890-016250 0227 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 203.80 447822 6/4/2020 101515 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO. 106.00 SLAB BOLSTER 522038 496931 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 877.25 CONCRETE REDIE MIX 521994 C2174149 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 1,573.00 REDIE MIX CONCRETE 522187 C2174565 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 1,694.00 REDIE MIX CONCRETE 522188 C2174591 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 4,250.25 447823 6/4/2020 142533 CES IMAGING 209.25 CANON LEASE 522039 INV114747 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 69.75 CANON LEASE 522039 INV114747 6303.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC WORKS EXPENSES 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 5Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 447823 6/4/2020 142533 CES IMAGING Continued... 279.00 447824 6/4/2020 142028 CINTAS CORPORATION 76.75 TOWELS 521995 4051185100 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL 13.44 UNIFORMS 521996 4051358838 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 90.19 447825 6/4/2020 145078 CLICGEAR USA 2,052.00 MERCHANDISE 521911 1122812-00 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 2,052.00 447826 6/4/2020 145596 COLONIAL CHURCH 75.00 522191 1285095-REFUND 1600.4722.08 SHELTER BUILDING RENT PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 75.00 447827 6/4/2020 142022 COMPASS MINERALS AMERICA 6,263.20 REGULAR ROAD SALT 521915 637819 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 6,263.20 447828 6/4/2020 146885 CONSTRUCTIVE BUILDING ADVISORS, LLC 525.00 CENTER RAMP INSPECTOR 522040 2019-07-2 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 525.00 447829 6/4/2020 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES 316.74 SHIRTS 521997 72768 5761.6201 LAUNDRY CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 316.74 447830 6/4/2020 127913 CUTTER SALES 5.17 ENGINE SEAL 521998 143584 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 5.17 447831 6/4/2020 104020 DALCO 316.41 PARKS SUPPLIES 521904 3609891 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 330.00 CLEANING SUPPLIES 522000 3616200 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 110.00 CLEANING SUPPLIES 521999 3616614 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 756.41 447832 6/4/2020 143156 DEHLI, JODI ANN 125.00 521964 00122259-015372 9007 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 6Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 447832 6/4/2020 143156 DEHLI, JODI ANN Continued... 125.00 447833 6/4/2020 146961 DOBOSZENSKI & SONS, INC. 19,458.53 PAY #1 521944 6664 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 19,458.54 PAY #1 521944 6664 1301.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 19,458.53 PAY #1 521944 6664 5932.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL STORM SEWER 58,375.60 447834 6/4/2020 128180 ECO WORKS SUPPLY 168.00 SOLUBLE FERT FOR GREENS 521983 21270 5422.6540 FERTILIZER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 512.00 LIQUID FERT FOR GREENS 521982 5370 5422.6540 FERTILIZER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 680.00 447835 6/4/2020 103594 EDINALARM INC. 250.00 522042 52821 5821.6250 ALARM SERVICE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 250.00 522041 52822 5841.6250 ALARM SERVICE YORK OCCUPANCY 500.00 447836 6/4/2020 122792 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC. 525.20 LIGHTS FOR 26-274 521946 SVC28111 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 525.20 447837 6/4/2020 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY 107.38 BOLTS 522001 MNTC2162404 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 107.38 447838 6/4/2020 103600 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. 59.62 CURB BOX 522043 0454031-1 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 59.62 447839 6/4/2020 116492 FINANCE AND COMMERCE 178.38 2020 SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS 521961 744719991 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 178.38 447840 6/4/2020 126444 FISH WINDOW CLEANING 900.00 RAMP WINDOW CLEANING 522002 2315-36555 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 900.00 447841 6/4/2020 136688 FUN EXPRESS LLC 598.96 RECTIVITY BOXES-JUNE 521984 703335756-01 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 7Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 447841 6/4/2020 136688 FUN EXPRESS LLC Continued... 598.96 447842 6/4/2020 144982 GERTEN GREENHOUSES & GARD - CHECK 103185 18.95 MULCH 522003 66420/6 5761.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 18.95 447843 6/4/2020 116190 GLOBAL EQUIPMENT COMPANY 827.86 FACE SHEILDS COVID RESPONSE 521922 115928895 6303.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC WORKS EXPENSES 827.86 447844 6/4/2020 118941 GLOBALSTAR USA 110.61 R-91 PHONE 522044 000000000364301 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 110.61 447845 6/4/2020 106535 GOTTESMAN, CAROL 22.00 PARTIAL YOGA REFUND 522045 1233040-REFUND 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 22.00 447846 6/4/2020 100781 GRAFIX SHOPPE 306.26 LICENSE PLATES 522046 133928 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 306.26 447847 6/4/2020 101103 GRAINGER 117.84 GLOVES 522006 9543120662 1640.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 38.36 SCIRRORS 522004 9543237854 6102.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 54.32 EXTENSION CORDS 522005 9543671300 6102.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 210.52 447848 6/4/2020 129108 HAAG COMPANIES INC. 30.00 SOIL 522047 2-247327 1640.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 30.00 447849 6/4/2020 100798 HAYDEN-MURPHY EQUIPMENT 7,900.00 521914 R39572 1301.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 7,900.00 447850 6/4/2020 143563 HEADFLYER BREWING 117.00 23131 522192 E-1965 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 54.00 23146 522193 E-1966 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 171.00 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 8Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 447850 6/4/2020 143563 HEADFLYER BREWING Continued... 447851 6/4/2020 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 835.20 23125 522194 203259 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 824.52 23265 522195 204012 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,589.50 23277 522196 472 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,249.22 447852 6/4/2020 105396 HOPF, NANCY 11.00 REFUND FOR YOGA CLASS 521956 1285515-REFUND 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 11.00 447853 6/4/2020 148525 HOUGH, SHERYL 600.00 RENTAL REFUND DUE TO PANDEMIC 521949 1165999-REFUND 5751.4555 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK CENTENNIAL LAKES REVENUE 600.00 447854 6/4/2020 146137 HUINKER, BRYAN 21.99 UNIFORM 521924 FLEET FARM REIMBURSEMENT 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 21.99 447855 6/4/2020 146427 INBOUND BREWCO 146.00 23148 522197 7021 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 92.00 23161 522198 7031 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 238.00 447856 6/4/2020 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 158.50 23154 522200 90252 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 259.90 23147 522199 90253 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 418.40 447857 6/4/2020 146310 J KATH LLC 725.00 521945 5/4/20 01451.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Chowen A/B 725.00 447858 6/4/2020 108618 JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY INC. 282.00 REBRAND, CLEAN AND REPAIR PPE 521909 IN118217 1470.6552 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 282.00 447859 6/4/2020 145422 JEFFERSON, LONNIA 941.52 2020 L JEFFERSON TUITION REIMB 522149 FALL 2020 1170.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER HUMAN RESOURCES 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 9Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 447859 6/4/2020 145422 JEFFERSON, LONNIA Continued... TUITION 941.52 447860 6/4/2020 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 946.65 23154 522202 3087784 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5,567.60 23139 522007 3087785 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,657.15 23127 522201 3087786 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8,171.40 447861 6/4/2020 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 102.67-2389 522209 101265 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.19-2389 522209 101265 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 24.40 23075 522210 146621 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,665.50 23075 522210 146621 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 50.84 23052 522213 1564685 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 174.38 23122 522212 1564686 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,071.21 23055 522211 1564687 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 635.26 23115 522214 1564688 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 413.35 23188 522216 1564689 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,095.47 23058 522215 1564690 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5.95 23101 522217 1565438 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 413.70 522217 1565438 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.38 23103 522218 1565439 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 204.75 522218 1565439 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.19 23106 522224 1565440 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 171.00 522224 1565440 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 19.04 23186 522219 1565441 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,742.25 522219 1565441 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 10.71 23187 522222 1565442 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 508.50 522222 1565442 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.19 23112 522221 1565443 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 123.38 522221 1565443 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7.85 23113 522225 1565444 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,309.56 522225 1565444 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5.95 23194 522220 1565445 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 482.50 522220 1565445 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.19 23093 522204 1565447 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 240.00 23093 522204 1565447 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.38 23077 522207 1565448 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 212.75 23077 522207 1565448 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 10Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 447861 6/4/2020 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.Continued... 11.90 23189 522203 1565450 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 565.00 23189 522203 1565450 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 16.66 23080 522205 1565451 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 695.15 23080 522205 1565451 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 12.11 23090 522208 1565452 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,991.11 23090 522208 1565452 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 45.23 23195 522206 1565453 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,857.50 23195 522206 1565453 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 993.20 23115 522223 23120 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8.80-23201 522226 598070 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 18,671.83 447862 6/4/2020 148136 JOHNSON, MIRANDA 180.00 521965 00118647-020363 0008 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 180.00 447863 6/4/2020 140992 JTS CONSTRUCTION 186,746.25 PAY #1 522062 ENG 20-7 07153.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Valley View Rd Ped Bridge 186,746.25 447864 6/4/2020 148526 KALMAN, KAYLA ADAMS 600.00 RENTAL REFUND DUE TO PANDEMIC 521950 1286183-REFUND 5751.4555 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK CENTENNIAL LAKES REVENUE 600.00 447865 6/4/2020 113212 KENDELL DOORS & HARDWARE INC. 415.50 KEYS AND CORES 521953 IN018831 1647.6530 REPAIR PARTS PATHS & HARD SURFACE 415.50 447866 6/4/2020 144983 KLEIN UNDERGROUND, LLC 675.00 BT PATCHING 522048 50484 5932.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL STORM SEWER 675.00 447867 6/4/2020 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 862.36 SIGN HARDWARE 522008 9307613869 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 862.36 447868 6/4/2020 105726 LINDMAN, DAVID 3.53 ADD COST FOR REPLACEMENT LCD 521906 10-04976-40161 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 13.95 ADD COST FOR REPLACEMENT LCD 521906 10-04976-40161 1400.6235 POSTAGE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 11Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 447868 6/4/2020 105726 LINDMAN, DAVID Continued... 10.95 SHIPPING CHARGE FOR CRYSTAL PD 521905 1ZT77ZL60300011 813 1400.6235 POSTAGE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 28.43 447869 6/4/2020 146117 MAJEWSKI, AMY K 530.00 INSTAGRAM CONSULTING 522272 #00008 6202.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT I.T. EXPENSES 530.00 447870 6/4/2020 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 3,305.17 FUEL 521986 021737349 6102.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 13,310.80 FUEL 521936 837630 6102.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 4,097.18 FUEL 521939 837635 6102.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 20,713.15 447871 6/4/2020 141215 MAVERICK WINE LLC - PREV NEGOCE 6.00 23262 522228 448101 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 919.86 522228 448101 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 925.86 23261 522227 INV448102 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,851.72 447872 6/4/2020 147403 Mccabe, Karie 60.00 CLASS REFUND 522009 GROUP CLASS 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 60.00 447873 6/4/2020 101483 MENARDS 16.86 PLUMBING PARTS 521957 15774 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 33.82 CHEMICAL 521958 15852 1642.6546 WEED SPRAY FIELD MAINTENANCE 309.69 FENCE 521959 15853 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 3.69 LOCKER ROOM SUPPLIES 521935 16462 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 112.13 SUPPLIES 521942 16626 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 210.76 522010 16900 5821.6530 REPAIR PARTS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 30.69 PLUMBING PARTS 522053 17026 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 717.64 447874 6/4/2020 101987 MENARDS 31.47 GENERAL SUPPLIES 522049 95779 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 34.97 GENERAL 522051 96004 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 4.09 GENERAL SUPPLIES 522052 97562 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 154.20 GENERAL SUPPLIES 522050 98062 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 224.73 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 12Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 447874 6/4/2020 101987 MENARDS Continued... 447875 6/4/2020 141259 MEYER CONTRACTING INC. 1,250.00 WDDALE VVIEW SIGNAL 521962 ENG 19-18 FINAL 07158.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Wooddale/VV Traffic Signal 14,247.93 WDDALE VVIEW SIGNAL 521962 ENG 19-18 FINAL 01267.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS MSA Maintenance Projects 8,872.11 WDDALE VVIEW SIGNAL 521962 ENG 19-18 FINAL 9235.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT VALLEY VIEW/WOODDALE TIF DIST 24,370.04 447876 6/4/2020 134387 MIDWEST MAILING SYSTEMS INC. 3,867.83 521927 05202020 1490.6575 PRINTING PUBLIC HEALTH 3,867.83 447877 6/4/2020 127062 MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC. 43.01 522011 180158351 5841.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS YORK OCCUPANCY 43.01 447878 6/4/2020 101537 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 276.49 521907 10000104140 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 276.49 447879 6/4/2020 101537 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 276.49 PW WASTE 521921 10000104144 6303.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC WORKS EXPENSES 276.49 447880 6/4/2020 123909 MINNESOTA SODDING CO LLC 9,976.17 GRUB CONTROL 521960 9648 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 9,976.17 447881 6/4/2020 146902 MN ASSC OF GOVERNEMENT COMMUNICATORS 170.00 MAGC NORTHERN LIGHTS ENTRY 522271 INV-194 1130.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COMMUNICATIONS 170.00 447882 6/4/2020 140955 MODIST BREWING LLC 234.00 23269 522229 13901 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 262.50 23282 522230 E-13903 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 496.50 447883 6/4/2020 120999 MOHAWK RESOURCES LTD 1,562.45 HOIST PARTS 521938 50924 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 1,562.45 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 13Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 447884 6/4/2020 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC.Continued... 535.05 SPRINKLER HEAD PARTS 521979 1256912-00 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 656.18 PILOT VALVES AND BOTTOM VALVES 522014 1256912-01 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 17.24 GAS CAP 522013 1257273-00 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 1,208.47 447885 6/4/2020 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 4.00 23105 522233 157551 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 148.16 522233 157551 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 232.00 23057 522232 157553 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 12.00 23079 522231 157572 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 560.00 23079 522231 157572 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 956.16 447886 6/4/2020 103106 NLSC PRODUCTS INC. 115.46 SO. TRASH ROOM LTS 522015 116759 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 115.46 447887 6/4/2020 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 1,396.17 CRADLE FOR COMPUTER MOUNT, SLI 521937 50339 6102.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 694.84 REPLACEMENT STROBE LIGHTS 521969 50476 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 2,091.01 447888 6/4/2020 100936 OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE, INC. 265.94 SWIVEL HOOK AND STRAPS 521940 655650 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 265.94 447889 6/4/2020 141965 OMNI BREWING COMPANY LLC 90.00 23144 522016 E-7199 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 90.00 447890 6/4/2020 101659 ORKIN 153.42 GRANGE PEST 521918 197224304 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 26.28 SOUTH RAMP PEST 521920 197225231 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 32.10 PAM ATH PEST 521923 197225852 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 63.00 HIST PEST 522017 197225853 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 30.00 NORTH RAMP PEST 521919 197225921 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 304.80 447891 6/4/2020 146239 PARRO'S GUN SHOP & POLICE SUPPLIES INC 192.30 VEST POUCHES FOR PEDERSEN 521977 5/21/2020 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 14Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 447891 6/4/2020 146239 PARRO'S GUN SHOP & POLICE SUPPLIES INC Continued... 192.30 447892 6/4/2020 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 1,803.75 23167 522234 90839 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,053.40 23051 522235 90848 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.25 23100 522236 90851 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 143.00 522236 90851 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 10.00 23074 522237 90859 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,117.70 23074 522237 90859 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,130.10 447893 6/4/2020 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 115.44 20571 521987 2696203 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,138.00 20571 521987 2696203 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5.95 23095 522239 6039011 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,008.00 522239 6039011 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.38 23107 522240 6039012 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 116.88 522240 6039012 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.19 23085 522238 6039014 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 58.44 23085 522238 6039014 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5,446.28 447894 6/4/2020 130926 PLANTSCAPE INC. 915.00 REPLACEMENT SOIL 522055 359254 5720.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 915.00 447895 6/4/2020 142004 POLLARD WATER 923.89 MANHOLE PICKS 522056 0166929 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 923.89 447896 6/4/2020 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 386.00 TIRES 521970 210472533 6102.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 386.00 447897 6/4/2020 138292 PRECISE IRRIGATION 2,331.80 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 522018 3889 5761.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 545.72 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 522019 3890 5761.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 2,877.52 447898 6/4/2020 105690 PRO-TEC DESIGN INC. 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 15Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 447898 6/4/2020 105690 PRO-TEC DESIGN INC.Continued... 160.08 KEY CARD CHANGES 522057 96782 1646.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 160.08 447899 6/4/2020 143618 PRYES BREWING COMPANY 390.00 23290 522241 1-11525 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 390.00 447900 6/4/2020 146597 ROBERT FLOORING 4,366.40 OFFICE CARPET 522020 356 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 4,366.40 447901 6/4/2020 127774 ROOTSTOCK WINE COMPANY 294.00 23060 522242 20-11880 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 294.00 447902 6/4/2020 144279 SAFELITE FULFILLMENT INC 224.50 WINDSHIELD REPLACEMENT 25338 521971 03819-002418 6102.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 224.50 447903 6/4/2020 101431 SCAN AIR FILTER INC. 1,822.47 HVAC FILTERS 522021 148945 6303.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC WORKS EXPENSES 1,822.47 447904 6/4/2020 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. 879.60 CITY HALL ELEVATOR 521917 8105237500 6302.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL EXPENSES 879.60 447905 6/4/2020 103479 SCHULTZ, RYAN 1,210.00 2020 2ND TUITION REIM 521943 5/2020 TUITION 1170.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER HUMAN RESOURCES 1,210.00 447906 6/4/2020 133069 SCOTT'S GARAGE DOORS 3,340.00 ST. 1 GARAGE DOORS 522022 360 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 3,340.00 447907 6/4/2020 100998 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 180.85 FLOOR PAINT 521941 2632-1 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 180.85 447908 6/4/2020 120784 SIGN PRO 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 16Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 447908 6/4/2020 120784 SIGN PRO Continued... 196.02 522023 15196 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 196.02 447909 6/4/2020 100999 SIGNAL SYSTEMS INC. 46.80 TIME CLOCK RENTAL 522058 13091926 5310.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POOL ADMINISTRATION 46.80 447910 6/4/2020 137482 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 9.19 PVC FITTINGS FOR CH/HOLE 21 522025 99647213-001 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 73.97 HANDHELD SPRAYERS FOR CARTS 522025 99647213-001 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 78.31 FERTILIZER 522059 99780710-001 1642.6540 FERTILIZER FIELD MAINTENANCE 176.82 IRRIGATION PARTS 521925 99885199-001 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 46.91 IRRIGATION PARTS 521976 99950010-001 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 723.27 IRRIGATION PARTS 522024 99951103-001 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 1,108.47 447911 6/4/2020 140283 SMSC ENTERPRISES 200.00 DEBRIS DISPOSAL 521954 SALES0000000060 61 1644.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL TREES & MAINTENANCE 200.00 447912 6/4/2020 100430 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 282.53 REPLACEMENT ITEMS 521929 ARV/43707861DUP 6102.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 282.53 447913 6/4/2020 101000 SOULO COMMUNICATIONS 61.40 BUS CARDS 522060 110598 5410.6575 PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION 61.40 447914 6/4/2020 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 16.00 22959 522254 1953880 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,793.25 22959 522254 1953880 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 62.40 23330 522258 1955058 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,150.00 522258 1955058 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3.20 23097 522252 1955944 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 240.00 522252 1955944 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.40 23108 522253 1955945 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 269.64 522253 1955945 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.60 23098 522255 1955946 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 336.00 522255 1955946 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 17Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 447914 6/4/2020 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS Continued... 570.40 23049 522250 1955947 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,836.00 23176 522249 1955948 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,007.25 23117 522251 1955950 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,320.30 23180 522248 1955951 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET .80 522247 1955952 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 13.60 23072 522245 1955954 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,240.00 23072 522245 1955954 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 24.00 23175 522243 1955955 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,400.00 23175 522243 1955955 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET .80 23183 522246 1955956 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 410.50 23183 522246 1955956 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7.20 23086 522244 1955957 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 937.82 23086 522244 1955957 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,387.23 23335 522256 1958056 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 866.40 23229 522257 1958057 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 23,896.79 447915 6/4/2020 148527 STANLEY CONSULTANTS 300.00 RENTAL REFUND DUE TO PANDEMIC 521951 1276482-REFUND 5751.4555 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK CENTENNIAL LAKES REVENUE 300.00 447916 6/4/2020 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 246.00 23129 522259 34273 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 297.00 23142 522260 34274 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 543.00 447917 6/4/2020 147510 Stevens, Charlynn 453.00 CLASS REFUND 522026 GROUP CLASS 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 453.00 447918 6/4/2020 101015 STREICHERS 184.99 UNIFORMS 522027 I1432231 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 184.99 447919 6/4/2020 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 117.34 RAD HOSE 521933 46291 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 117.34 447920 6/4/2020 135269 TJB HOMES INC. 154.60 521963 00126416-034211 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 18Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 447920 6/4/2020 135269 TJB HOMES INC.Continued... 1002 #2 154.60 447921 6/4/2020 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 113.30 MIG WELDER SUPPLYS 521931 10352908 6102.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 113.30 447922 6/4/2020 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 163.81 THROTTLE CABLES-BUNKER RAKES 522028 EI11549 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 163.81 447923 6/4/2020 103973 ULINE 250.88 521916 118924760 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 250.88 447924 6/4/2020 133459 UNITED FARMERS COOPERATIVE 545.78 MOWER PARTS 522029 943074 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS MOWING 545.78 447925 6/4/2020 131957 UNIVERSAL ATHLETIC BOZEMAN 530.62 FACE MASKS 522030 150-0049431-01 5510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 176.88 FACE MASKS 522030 150-0049431-01 5552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME ADMINISTRATION 707.50 447926 6/4/2020 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 362.98 522031 540454-00 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 362.98 447927 6/4/2020 141581 VENTURE PRODUCTS INC. 5,345.80 DROP SPREADER SNOW REM 521948 V12104759 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 5,345.80 447928 6/4/2020 101064 VESSCO INC. 4,847.00 CHEMICAL FEED PUMPS 521978 80142 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 4,847.00 447929 6/4/2020 145932 WEBER, ANN 22.00 PARTIAL YOGA REFUND 522061 1158443-REFUND 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 22.00 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 19Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 447930 6/4/2020 132521 WHITED, COURTNEY Continued... 75.00 COURTYARD REFUND 522032 GOLF COURSE 5401.4553 CLUBHOUSE GOLF REVENUES 75.00 447931 6/4/2020 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 2,159.83 23059 522261 142839 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,159.83 447932 6/4/2020 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 1,051.90 23181 522264 7285386 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,228.23 23054 522263 7285387 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4.76 23102 522265 7285516 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,804.00 522265 7285516 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8.33 23076 522262 7285517 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,853.00 23076 522262 7285517 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 13.09 23182 522266 7285872 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,520.00 522266 7285872 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 10,483.31 447933 6/4/2020 144412 WINEBOW 5.25 23078 522267 MN00079061 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 674.00 23078 522267 MN00079061 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 257.25 23236 522268 MN00079311 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 936.50 447934 6/4/2020 142162 WOODEN HILL BREWING CO 209.40 23015 522269 2232 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 209.40 447935 6/4/2020 142220 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY 110.70 23158 522270 2237 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 110.70 447936 6/4/2020 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 5,048.00 521912 R-015430-000 04456.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN West 58th Street 2,363.70 521947 R-015878-000-1 4614.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Asset Mgmt Software and Equip 1,575.80 521947 R-015878-000-1 4615.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Asst Mgmt SW & Equip - Storm 8,987.50 447937 6/4/2020 138181 ZILKA, CHRISTY 75.00 COURTYARD REFUND 522033 GOLF COURSE 5401.4553 CLUBHOUSE GOLF REVENUES 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 20Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 447937 6/4/2020 138181 ZILKA, CHRISTY Continued... 75.00 447938 6/11/2020 120831 1ST SCRIBE INC. - PERRILL 425.00 ROWAY 522668 251498 1263.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENVIRONMENT 425.00 447939 6/11/2020 142327 56 BREWING, LLC 102.00 23171 522554 5610426 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 102.00 447940 6/11/2020 101971 ABLE HOSE & RUBBER LLC 31.76 PART FOR SUCTION HOSE 522669 219618-001 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 31.76 447941 6/11/2020 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 2.00 23352 522555 2504760 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 141.37 23352 522555 2504760 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 143.37 447942 6/11/2020 129458 ACME TOOLS 25.98 HANDLE 522318 7602134 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 19.98 SHEILD 522317 7603792 1640.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 19.98 SHEILD 522316 7605606 1640.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 65.94 447943 6/11/2020 144986 ADSPEC MARKETING, INC 5,338.18 BAG TAGS FOR LESSONS 522670 40205 5412.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER GOLF INSTRUCTION 5,338.18 447944 6/11/2020 149222 AI, HENGJI 450.00 REFUND JUNE 7 EVENT 522671 1163875-REFUND 5751.4555 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK CENTENNIAL LAKES REVENUE 450.00 447945 6/11/2020 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 247.31 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 522319 178305 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 247.31 447946 6/11/2020 112033 ALLDATA 1,500.00 CFA SOFEWARE RENEW 522320 SUBSCRIPTION NEWAL 2020 6102.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 21Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 447946 6/11/2020 112033 ALLDATA Continued... 1,500.00 447947 6/11/2020 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 184.57 LIGHT BULBS 522325 1177-CDGP-MLC3 5765.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PROMENADE EXPENSES 50.32 TIMECARD RACK 522324 14PX-NCQF-6TPW 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 29.98 SCADA NIC CARDS 522329 14QG-Q697-V3CP 6202.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES I.T. EXPENSES 214.99 HEATER 522672 173M-LMNG-491H 6102.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 25.16-CREDIT FOR RETURNED PRODUCT 522677 1CFK-LGTQ-6HTJ 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 121.98 PLANTINGS 522678 1F9Y-99LV-JGJK 5422.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 99.95 SKATE SCHOOL TOYS 522674 1KD6-GDVV-4CF6 5510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 184.35 JUNE RECTIVITY BOXES 522330 1KLL-WRJ4-116M 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 32.97 SD DATA CARDS 522328 1L36-J6R3-36TT 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 80.97 RECTIVITY SPICE BOX 522322 1LJ3-DT6X-131X 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 163.04 PIPE 522675 1MHF-6CG1-R6JH 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 114.24 AIR HORNS 522323 1PQY-69GN-4GDY 5440.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 304.13 IT SUPPLIES 522327 1Q6X-FT69-FMH6 6202.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT I.T. EXPENSES 237.10 MASKS 522676 1QFL-H34G-C7MT 5410.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION 237.47 COVID 522321 1QXL-3VFW-JMYY 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 35.00 TOOL SHEATH 522673 1RLR-TQDW-677V 6102.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 53.40 MICRO SD CARDS 522680 1VCX-HDYV-VGML 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 23.98 SPICE RECTIVITY BOX 522679 1VCX-HDYV-Y67H 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 262.64 PRESSURE WASHER 522326 1YXL-C16H-1QD7 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 291.00 IT SUPPLIES 522681 1YXL-C16H-RMTQ 6202.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT I.T. EXPENSES 2,696.92 447948 6/11/2020 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES INC. 223.08 LAUNDRY 522331 1004790979 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 223.08 447949 6/11/2020 100630 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY 3,322.32 522332 10620626-00 1130.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 3,322.32 447950 6/11/2020 149210 ANDERSON, ROGER 194.73 522682 00079325-030554 4006 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 194.73 447951 6/11/2020 149232 ANSEMS, MONICA 49.00 CLASS REFUND 522683 GOLF COURSE 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 22Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 447951 6/11/2020 149232 ANSEMS, MONICA Continued... 49.00 447952 6/11/2020 143763 APPLE FORD LINCOLN 2,165.00 522691 05/29/2020 421470.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE EQUIPMENT 2,165.00 522684 05/29/2020 #2 421470.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE EQUIPMENT 2,165.00 522685 05/29/2020 #3 421470.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE EQUIPMENT 2,165.00 522686 05/29/2020 #4 421470.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE EQUIPMENT 156.68 COVER ASY 522687 A1CB169018 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 8,816.68 447953 6/11/2020 135988 APPRIZE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC. 1,111.80 JUNE APPRIZE INVOICE 522333 20122 1170.6160 DATA PROCESSING HUMAN RESOURCES 1,111.80 447954 6/11/2020 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 2,183.20 23268 522557 3420578 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,085.15 23281 522556 3420579 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,184.55 23298 522560 3420580 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 71.20 23329 522559 3420581 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 84.04-2402 522558 489779 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5,440.06 447955 6/11/2020 106304 ASPEN MILLS 243.40 UNIFORMS 2019 522688 241480 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 280.20 UNIFORMS 2019 522335 243213 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 234.80 UNIFORMS 2019 522338 243214 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 386.15 UNIFORMS 2019 522695 243215 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 98.85 UNIFORMS 2019 522340 245426 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 88.85 UNIFORMS 2019 522339 245427 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 111.65 UNIFORMS 2019 522692 245975 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 387.60 UNIFORMS 2019 522694 246798 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 400.00 UNIFORMS 2019 522337 247014 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 149.85 UNIFORMS 2019 522693 247678 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 241.25 UNIFORMS 2019 522336 247679 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 121.70 UNIFORMS 2019 522690 247680 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 542.05 UNIFORMS 2019 522689 247948 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 195.55 UNIFORMS 2019 522696 247949 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 16.85 UNIFORMS 2019 522344 248501 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 254.55 UNIFORMS 2019 522341 248502 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 49.50 UNIFORMS 2019 522348 249100 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 23Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 447955 6/11/2020 106304 ASPEN MILLS Continued... 390.35 UNIFORMS 2019 522350 249101 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 121.45 UNIFORMS 2019 522345 249102 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 244.70 UNIFORMS 2019 522349 250483 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 561.20 UNIFORMS 2019 522347 250497 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,351.89 UNIFORMS 2020 522346 254136 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,291.94 UNIFORMS 2020 522343 254137 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 446.00 UNIFORMS 2020 522342 257286 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,177.95 BALLISTIC VEST 522334 257301 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 9,388.28 447956 6/11/2020 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 255.10 TRASH REMOVAL 522853 1-146354040120 7411.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL PSTF OCCUPANCY 254.62 522856 S1146354-050120 7411.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL PSTF OCCUPANCY 258.39 TRASH REMOVAL 522855 S1146354-060120 7411.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL PSTF OCCUPANCY 258.39 TRASH REMOVAL 522854 S1146354-06120 7411.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL PSTF OCCUPANCY 1,026.50 447957 6/11/2020 101718 AUTO PLUS - FORMERLY PARTS PLUS 28.08 FILTER 522351 380002996 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 6.91 FILTER 522353 380003256 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 17.33 FILTERS 522352 380003294 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 2.70 FILTER 522356 380003650 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 20.56 FILTER 522354 380004054 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 24.52 FILTER 522355 380004162 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 100.10 447958 6/11/2020 100637 AUTOMOBILE SERVICE CO. 159.95 VEHICLE ALIGNMENT 522357 2139 6102.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 367.04 VEHICLE ALIGNMANT 522358 3026 6102.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 526.99 447959 6/11/2020 149206 BAILEY, TRACEY 124.10 522697 00126134-011083 003 #2 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 124.10 447960 6/11/2020 102709 BDS LAUNDRY SYSTEMS 242.05 REPAIR PARTS ST. 1 522698 SO10173180 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 242.05 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 24Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 447961 6/11/2020 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC.Continued... 188.67 FLOORING ADHESIVE 522777 1023470 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 188.67 447962 6/11/2020 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 12.40 23332 522564 84282600 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,797.65 23332 522564 84282600 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 719.00 23334 522561 84282900 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 9.30 23336 522563 84283000 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,394.70 522563 84283000 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 247.10 23053 522562 84315500 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,180.15 447963 6/11/2020 139473 BENGTSON, MIKE 584.20 K9 EXPENSES 522829 VET AND FOOD 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 584.20 447964 6/11/2020 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 1,009.73 LAWN CARE 522776 154251 7411.6136 SNOW & LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY 1,009.73 447965 6/11/2020 149215 BERNARD, WAYNE 2,000.00 COVID REFUND 522778 1051185-REFUND 5501.4556 ICE RENTAL ICE ARENA REVENUES 2,000.00 447966 6/11/2020 149226 BHM CAPTIAL MANAGEMENT LLC 13.79 522775 00125800-020037 4004 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 13.79 447967 6/11/2020 142579 BIRELEY, MEGAN 125.00 CLASS REFUND 522359 GOLF COURSE 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 125.00 447968 6/11/2020 142153 BLACK STACK BREWING INC. 162.00 23347 522565 8401 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 162.00 23349 522566 8402 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 324.00 447969 6/11/2020 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 26.81 PW SUPPLIES 522774 159231 6303.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC WORKS EXPENSES 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 25Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 447969 6/11/2020 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS Continued... 26.81 447970 6/11/2020 132444 BOLTON & MENK INC. 2,830.00 INSPECTIONS CC TOWER 522362 0250914 05589.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Community Center Water Tower 2,895.00 CONSULTANT FEES CC TOWER 522361 0250915 05589.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Community Center Water Tower 71,689.00 BENTON BRIDGE DESIGN 522360 0251035 01267.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN MSA Maintenance Projects 77,414.00 447971 6/11/2020 149230 BORDEN, KENNETH 25.85 522773 00077070-011138 6009 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 25.85 447972 6/11/2020 101010 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 463.64 MOTION CTRL SOUTH HALL LTS 522772 920060914 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 463.64 447973 6/11/2020 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 60.00-AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 522162 107703 REBATE 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 98.90 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 522363 83641518 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 155.99 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 522364 83646900 4635.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES COVID-19 194.89 447974 6/11/2020 148597 BOUNK, JOANN 22.00 YOGA CLASS REFUND 522847 1211506-REFUND 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 22.00 447975 6/11/2020 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 517.14 GEOTECHNICAL EVAL WARREN AVE 522366 B208978 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 1,003.86 GEOTECHNICAL EVAL WARREN AVE 522366 B208978 1301.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 6,153.90 NORTH RAMP - ENVIRONMENTAL 522770 B209478 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 7,674.90 447976 6/11/2020 121346 BRAUN, MAGGIE 75.00 COURTYARD REFUND 522367 GOLF COURSE 5401.4553 CLUBHOUSE GOLF REVENUES 75.00 447977 6/11/2020 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 5.75 23243 522568 1081138701 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 850.10 23243 522568 1081138701 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 26Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 447977 6/11/2020 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA Continued... 22.52 23250 522567 1081138702 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,388.00 23250 522567 1081138702 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,266.37 447978 6/11/2020 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER LLC 5,576.65 23294 522571 1091139853 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,067.50 23264 522570 1091139854 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,854.75 23276 522569 1091139855 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 10,498.90 447979 6/11/2020 103239 BRIN GLASS CO. 2,094.44 CITY HALL GLASS 522769 8773 6302.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL EXPENSES 2,094.44 447980 6/11/2020 149236 BRISTOL, HARRIET 93.41 522768 AMBULANCE REFUND 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 93.41 447981 6/11/2020 100669 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC. 655.64 INFIELD 522368 41146 1642.6542 INFIELD MIXTURE FIELD MAINTENANCE 655.64 447982 6/11/2020 139027 BUTZ, ANDREA 125.00 CLASS REFUND 522767 GOLF COURSE 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 125.00 447983 6/11/2020 149220 CADWALLADER, BROCK 26.43 522766 00124164-034208 3097 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 26.43 447984 6/11/2020 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 3,991.20 522369 931492225 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 2,739.60 MERCHANDISE 522764 931513893 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 184.50 MERCHANDISE 522765 931522872 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 6,915.30 447985 6/11/2020 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 86.00-2396 522573 2420384 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 27Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 447985 6/11/2020 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES Continued... 3,547.05 23293 522572 2420386 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,461.05 447986 6/11/2020 145552 CEF EDINA COMMUNITY SOLAR, LLC 5.61 522762 APRIL 2020 6303.6185 LIGHT & POWER PUBLIC WORKS EXPENSES 4.70 522763 MARCH 2020 6303.6185 LIGHT & POWER PUBLIC WORKS EXPENSES 10.31 447987 6/11/2020 101515 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO. 1,564.50 REDIE MIX CONCRETE 522371 C2177331 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 1,683.00 REDIE MIX CONCRETE 522370 C2177367 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 1,490.00 REDIE MIX CONCRETE 522372 C2177596 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 1,266.50 REDIE MIX CONCRETE 522374 C2178350 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 1,490.00 REDIE MIX CONCRETE 522375 C2179492 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 870.00 CONCRETE 522373 C2179493 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 8,364.00 447988 6/11/2020 117433 CENTURY FENCE CO. 7,665.00 DEHUMIDIFIER FENCE 522376 208705101 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 7,665.00 447989 6/11/2020 149219 CHIDESTER, STEPHANIE 264.08 522761 00123884-020222 2004 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 264.08 447990 6/11/2020 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 7,619.21 Q2 LAB FEES 522380 7619 5915.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER WATER TREATMENT 7,619.21 447991 6/11/2020 122317 CITY OF EDINA - COMMUNICATIONS 100.00 PHONES, I.T.522758 COM-2184 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 100.00 447992 6/11/2020 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 334.28 65% OF XCEL BILL 522381 7539 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 334.28 447993 6/11/2020 146472 CITY WIDE MAINTENANCE OF MN 625.00 PUBLIC WORKS COVID CLEAN 522383 I00070007 4635.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COVID-19 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 28Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 447993 6/11/2020 146472 CITY WIDE MAINTENANCE OF MN Continued... 2,665.00 PUBLIC WORKS CLEAN 522383 I00070007 6303.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC WORKS EXPENSES 756.00 PW CLEANING 522382 I00070604 6303.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC WORKS EXPENSES 3,290.00-PW CLEANING CREDIT 521985 R00001760 6303.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC WORKS EXPENSES 756.00 447994 6/11/2020 100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIPMENT 5,299.60 COVID-19 PPE 522384 188680 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 5,299.60 447995 6/11/2020 130477 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO 267.00 23153 522189 536740 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 329.90-2390 522190 536761 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7.25-23296, 2400 522575 537517, 537574 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 110.00 23266 522574 537523 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 39.85 447996 6/11/2020 120433 COMCAST 33.85 CABLE TV 522385 106140373022-5/ 2020 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 33.85 447997 6/11/2020 120433 COMCAST 40.60 CABLE TV 522386 106140161120-5/ 2020 5511.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 40.60 447998 6/11/2020 144027 COMMUNITY GROWTH SOLUTIONS INC. 1,550.00 OFFICER WELLNESS 522387 20-04 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,550.00 447999 6/11/2020 142022 COMPASS MINERALS AMERICA 6,367.06 REGULAR ROAD SALT 522388 639550 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 19,889.04 REGULAR ROAD SALT 522389 640655 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 26,256.10 448000 6/11/2020 144092 CONCENTRA 1,500.00 COVID TESTING-CONCENTRA 522390 103182592 1170.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS HUMAN RESOURCES 1,500.00 448001 6/11/2020 148607 COUGHLIN, JANE 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 29Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 448001 6/11/2020 148607 COUGHLIN, JANE Continued... 33.19 522391 1130047-REFUND 1000.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 186.00 522391 1130047-REFUND 1000.2065 DEPOSITS PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 255.00 522391 1130047-REFUND 1600.4722.03 ARNESON ACRES RENTAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 474.19 448002 6/11/2020 100513 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES INC. 674.45 COVID CLEANING CITY HALL 522392 7070276724 4635.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COVID-19 674.45 448003 6/11/2020 147478 CREEK VALLEY PTO 26.91 518875 5501.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ICE ARENA REVENUES 26.91 448004 6/11/2020 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 166.81 WATER COOLER BOTTLES 522393 114X75686804 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 73.78 BOTTLED WATER 522394 114X75816302 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 240.59 448005 6/11/2020 119214 CUSTOM HOSE TECH INC. 78.68 HYRAULIC FITTINGS 522395 101629 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 78.68 448006 6/11/2020 104020 DALCO 224.62 522779 3619672 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 224.62 448007 6/11/2020 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 77.81 FLUID REMOVER 522396 200517 6102.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 77.81 448008 6/11/2020 148588 DIAMOND TOWER SERVICE 4,100.00 TELECOM REMOVALS CC TOWER 522397 34-20051904 05589.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Community Center Water Tower 4,100.00 448009 6/11/2020 124168 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS 3,937.10 ROAD PAINT 522398 802194474 1335.6532 PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS 3,937.10 448010 6/11/2020 149233 DOBIES, CAROLE 28.60 522780 1289606.1-REFUN 1000.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 30Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 448010 6/11/2020 149233 DOBIES, CAROLE Continued... D 380.00 522780 1289606.1-REFUN D 1600.4722.03 ARNESON ACRES RENTAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 408.60 448011 6/11/2020 148608 DOOM, GRETCHEN 40.71 522399 1130064-REFUND 1000.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 186.00 522399 1130064-REFUND 1000.2065 DEPOSITS PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 355.00 522399 1130064-REFUND 1600.4722.03 ARNESON ACRES RENTAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 581.71 448012 6/11/2020 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 387.50 PENT PARK - LOOKBACK 522781 3585266 9240.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL PENTAGON PARK DISTRICT 387.50 448013 6/11/2020 149240 EBERT, JOAN 80.00 522782 EDINAAMBULANCE 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 80.00 448014 6/11/2020 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 124.95 2020 SIDEWALK IMPR 522400 776780 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 89.25 CELL TOWER PH APPEAL 522401 776781 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 83.30 AMUNDSON PH 522402 777830 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 59.50 ORD NO 2020-07 522403 777831 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 166.60 50TH & FRANCE PAVER 522405 777832 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 83.30 FAIRVIEW PH 522404 777833 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 606.90 448015 6/11/2020 139928 EDINA FIRE DEPARTMENT 2,347.27 522406 MN-TFL 5/2020 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 2,347.27 448016 6/11/2020 139928 EDINA FIRE DEPARTMENT 1,355.92 522407 MN-TFL 5/2020 #2 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 1,355.92 448017 6/11/2020 148012 EVEREST EMERGENCY VEHICLES, INC 39.20 UP-FITTING AMBULANCES 522408 P04952 421470.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE EQUIPMENT 39.20 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 31Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 448017 6/11/2020 148012 EVEREST EMERGENCY VEHICLES, INC Continued... 448018 6/11/2020 148600 EWING,GEORGIA 22.00 YOGA CLASS REFUND 522852 1219931-REFUND 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 22.00 448019 6/11/2020 134730 EXPLORE EDINA 612.72 APRIL LODGING TAX 522409 060320 1001.4030 LODGING TAX GENERAL FUND REVENUES 1,437.12 APRIL LODGING TAX 522409 060320 1001.4030 LODGING TAX GENERAL FUND REVENUES 811.34 APRIL LODGING TAX 522409 060320 5701.4030 LODGING TAX EDINBOROUGH PARK REVENUES 2,861.18 448020 6/11/2020 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 159.90 GLOVES 522784 158-033251 6102.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 2.40 COOLANT 521421 1-6379528 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 201.96 TAIL LIGHT 522412 1-6398839 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 231.16 BRAKE ROTOR 522413 1-6400086 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 57.76 TIE ROD END 522416 1-6401209 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 5.84 FILTER 522415 1-6402497 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 47.71 BATTERY 521343 1-Z21858 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 336.46 BATTEIES 522783 1-Z21979 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 423.73-CREDIT MEMO 521334 69-383712 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 122.20 BATTERY 521416 69-383809 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 28.25 OUTLET ASY 521417 69-383913 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 300.13-CREDIT FOR RETURN 522418 69-384410 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 3.14 FILTER 521353 69-384440 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 95.94 DISPOSABLE GLOVES 521967 69-384681 6102.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 1,380.07 STEERING GEAR AND TIE RODS 522420 69-384799 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 290.67 BRAKE ROTORS AND PADS 522417 69-384814 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 245.12 CONTROL ARMS 522411 69-384834 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 476.40 BRAKE CALIPERS AND BRAKE PADS 522414 69-384950 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 6.82 BRAKE FLUID 522410 69-385087 6102.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 61.76 BLOWER MOTOR AND FILTER 522419 69-385350 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 3,029.70 448021 6/11/2020 147181 FALLING BREWERY - BERGMAN LEDGE, LLC 85.50 23313 522577 1434 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 81.00 23312 522578 E-1432 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 87.00 23311 522576 E-1433 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 253.50 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 32Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 448022 6/11/2020 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY Continued... 100.04 SAWZALL BLADES 522785 MNTC2162526 1330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TRAFFIC SIGNALS 100.04 448023 6/11/2020 103600 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. 428.46 FIRE HYD ROD FOR MARKET ST 522786 0455059 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 428.46 448024 6/11/2020 116492 FINANCE AND COMMERCE 212.29 50TH & FRANCE PAVEMENT 522421 744729550 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 212.29 448025 6/11/2020 138685 FIRE CATT LLC 3,577.90 2020 HOSE TEST 522422 8213 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 3,577.90 448026 6/11/2020 141837 FIRST CHOICE COFFEE SERVICES 119.77 COFFEE 522423 494330 6303.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC WORKS EXPENSES 619.95 COFFE FOR POLICE 522787 494337 1120.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 739.72 448027 6/11/2020 126444 FISH WINDOW CLEANING 900.00 50TH FRANCE WINDOWS 522757 2315-36655 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 900.00 448028 6/11/2020 130699 FLEETPRIDE 923.01 EXHAUST PARTS 522424 51814962 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 53.03 EXHAUST PARTS 522425 52690083 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 976.04 448029 6/11/2020 122414 FORKLIFTS OF MINNESOTA INC. 489.06 FUEL FOR FORKLIFTS 522426 01P7785360 6102.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 489.06 448030 6/11/2020 100760 FOWLER ELECTRIC CO. INC. 10.86 FILTER 522427 78128600 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 10.86 448031 6/11/2020 148595 FRASER, DONNA 22.00 YOGA CLASS REFUND 522846 1211298-REFUND 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 22.00 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 33Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 448031 6/11/2020 148595 FRASER, DONNA Continued... 448032 6/11/2020 136688 FUN EXPRESS LLC 263.21 RECTIVITY JUNE BOX 522428 703193316-01 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 263.21 448033 6/11/2020 149211 FYSTROM, RUSSELL 224.58 522756 00076533-011073 7007 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 224.58 448034 6/11/2020 102456 GALLS INC. 93.32 RESERVE UNIFORM 522429 BC1120670 1419.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE RESERVE PROGRAM 138.60 EQUIPMENT 522755 BC1127703 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 231.92 448035 6/11/2020 116190 GLOBAL EQUIPMENT COMPANY 781.69 GERMICIDAL CLEANER 522754 116020500 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 1,969.06 SANITIZING WIPES 522431 116040896 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 176.65 SANITIZER KIT 522430 116043169 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 2,927.40 448036 6/11/2020 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC. 1,863.00 MAY GSOC TIX 522432 0050359 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 1,863.00 448037 6/11/2020 101103 GRAINGER 70.14 MATERIAL FOR HVAC 522433 9541516416 6302.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL EXPENSES 38.88 RUST PREVENTOR 522750 9543929229 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 12.11 LENS CLEANER 522434 9545219165 6102.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 19.65 PAPER CLIPS 522752 9546309874 6102.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 10.86 LENS CLEANER 522751 9547016999 6102.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 47.50 WRITING TABLETS 522436 9547880188 6102.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 119.88 EAR PLUGS 522435 9548475038 6102.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 268.60 CART 522753 9551690721 6102.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 587.62 448038 6/11/2020 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 116.69 TV BRACKET - TRAINING ROOM 522437 9316112866 6302.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL EXPENSES 116.69 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 34Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 448039 6/11/2020 143575 GREENWOOD DESIGN BUILD LLC Continued... 10,000.00 ESCROW REFUND FROM NEW SFD 522438 ED155409-REFUND 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 10,000.00 448040 6/11/2020 149224 GROSSMAN, MAGGIE 149.00 CLASS REFUND 522749 GOLF COURSE 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 149.00 448041 6/11/2020 140010 GROUP HEALTH INC.-WORKSITE 389.00 MAY EAP INVOICE 522439 W817332 1170.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES 389.00 448042 6/11/2020 101964 GUSTAVE A. LARSON CO. 42.00 REFRIG RECLAIM 522440 3969046 6303.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC WORKS EXPENSES 42.00 REFRIG RECLAIM 522440 3969046 6302.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL EXPENSES 42.48 REFRIG RECLAIM 522440 3969046 6304.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKS & LIQUOR ENTERPRISE EXP 20.00-REFRIG RECLAIM DEPOSIT CREDIT 522441 3969175 6303.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC WORKS EXPENSES 20.00-REFRIG RECLAIM DEPOSIT CREDIT 522441 3969175 6302.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL EXPENSES 17.56-REFRIG RECLAIM DEPOSIT CREDIT 522441 3969175 6304.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKS & LIQUOR ENTERPRISE EXP 68.92 448043 6/11/2020 148586 HADDAD, JOHN 51.39 522442 00119767-034241 2008 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 51.39 448044 6/11/2020 148599 HALVORSON, LINDA 11.00 YOGA CLASS REFUND 522851 1251367-REFUND 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 11.00 448045 6/11/2020 149207 HARENS, PAM 22.28 522748 1130079-REFUND 1000.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 110.00 522748 1130079-REFUND 1600.4722.08 SHELTER BUILDING RENT PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 186.00 522748 1130079-REFUND 1000.2065 DEPOSITS PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 318.28 448046 6/11/2020 148585 HECKERS, LISA 175.00 522443 00121674-035002 5570 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 175.00 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 35Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 448047 6/11/2020 143585 HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE Continued... 2,870.10 MEDICAL DIRECTOR FEES 522444 65839 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,870.10 448048 6/11/2020 149221 HOGUIN, JERRY 52.01 522788 00098327-030471 5002 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 52.01 448049 6/11/2020 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 2,530.50 23295 522579 204010 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,530.50 448050 6/11/2020 146692 HURLEY, THERESE 5,000.00 ESCROW REFUND FROM NEW HOME 522789 ED158828-REFUND 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 5,000.00 448051 6/11/2020 149209 HUTSON, BETH 19.64 522790 1130078-REFUND 1000.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 75.00 522790 1130078-REFUND 1600.4722.08 SHELTER BUILDING RENT PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 186.00 522790 1130078-REFUND 1000.2065 DEPOSITS PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 280.64 448052 6/11/2020 134784 IDEA CREEK LLC, THE 135.00 PLAQUE 522445 136 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 135.00 448053 6/11/2020 146427 INBOUND BREWCO 92.00 23304 522580 7071 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 92.00 448054 6/11/2020 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 257.80 23271 522583 90430 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 544.80 23291 522581 90431 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 286.70 23303, 2399 522582 90432 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,089.30 448055 6/11/2020 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 93.60 IRRIGATION PARTS 522446 INV189757 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 93.60 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 36Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 448056 6/11/2020 147027 IRELAND, MARY Continued... 11.00 YOGA CLASS REFUND 522848 1201949-REFUND 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 11.00 448057 6/11/2020 149208 IYER, MALLIKA 44.48 522791 1130080-REFUND 1000.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 186.00 522791 1130080-REFUND 1000.2065 DEPOSITS PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 405.00 522791 1130080-REFUND 1600.4722.03 ARNESON ACRES RENTAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 635.48 448058 6/11/2020 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 29.19 GENERAL SUPPLIES 522447 5/2020-STREETS 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 126.48 GENERAL SUPPLIES 522447 5/2020-STREETS 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 144.76 GENERAL SUPPLIES 522447 5/2020-STREETS 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 31.01 SUPPLIES 522792 5/20-UTILITIES 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 35.96 LIFT STATION SUPPLIES 522792 5/20-UTILITIES 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 16.19 SUPPLIES 522792 5/20-UTILITIES 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 128.05 SUPPLIES 522792 5/20-UTILITIES 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 511.64 448059 6/11/2020 102146 JESSEN PRESS INC. 2,893.92 522448 685028 1130.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 2,893.92 448060 6/11/2020 121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC. 146.23 WEEKLY SERVICE/CLEANING 522449 164159 5422.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 218.00 522793 164650 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 364.23 448061 6/11/2020 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 153.00-522602 102304 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.19-2403 522602 102304 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,775.34 23115 522611 1564693 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3.57 23084 522588 1565449 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 516.50 23084 522588 1565449 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.38 23206 522601 1569827 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 190.30 522601 1569827 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.19 23218 522599 1569828 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 80.00 522599 1569828 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7.14 23208 522600 1569829 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 644.22 522600 1569829 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 37Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 448061 6/11/2020 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.Continued... 8.33 23212 522597 1569830 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 899.95 522597 1569830 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.19 23216 522596 1569831 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 89.81 522596 1569831 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4.37 23217 522598 1569832 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 655.00 522598 1569832 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 758.07 23232 522594 1569833 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 87.19 23226 522595 1569833-1 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 353.79 23235 522593 1569835 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,673.54 23219 522592 1569836 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 342.78 23238 522591 1569837 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 169.13 23223 522589 1569838 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,198.20 23224 522590 1569839 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 13.68 23254 522609 1569840 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 897.80 23254 522609 1569840 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 19.04 23256 522608 1569841 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,566.30 23256 522608 1569841 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3.57 23240 522606 1569842 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 416.00 23240 522606 1569842 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 19.04 23344 522607 1569843 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,742.25 23344 522607 1569843 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 19.04 23259 522605 1569844 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 847.09 23259 522605 1569844 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.38 23245 522604 1569845 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 239.94 23245 522604 1569845 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7.14 23246 522603 1569846 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,527.00 23246 522603 1569846 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 132.40 23355 522610 1570131 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 18,760.47 448062 6/11/2020 141864 JOSEPH E JOHNSON & SONS CONSTRUCTION 660.00 SEAM REPAIRS 522450 1093 5553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 660.00 448063 6/11/2020 147029 KENNEDY, DONNA 11.00 YOGA CLASS REFUND 522849 1210606-REFUND 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 11.00 448064 6/11/2020 148583 KHOUNBANAM, KOUKEO 200.00 522451 00084689-029054 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 38Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 448064 6/11/2020 148583 KHOUNBANAM, KOUKEO Continued... 4000 200.00 448065 6/11/2020 124002 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC. 1,166.29 COLD STORAGE BLDG 522452 16638052 6303.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC WORKS EXPENSES 1,166.29 448066 6/11/2020 144983 KLEIN UNDERGROUND, LLC 5,500.00 FACID6983 FULL REPLACEMENT 522455 50494 04451.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Pond & Outlet Maintenance 2019 5,100.00 FACID6985 FULL REPLACEMENT 522456 50495 04451.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Pond & Outlet Maintenance 2019 5,100.00 FACID6982 FULL REPLACEMENT 522454 50496 04451.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Pond & Outlet Maintenance 2019 5,100.00 FAC6933 FULL REPLACEMENT 522453 50497 04451.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Pond & Outlet Maintenance 2019 20,800.00 448067 6/11/2020 148605 KLEIN, KELSEY 75.00 COURTYARD REFUND 522457 GOLF COURSE 5401.4553 CLUBHOUSE GOLF REVENUES 75.00 448068 6/11/2020 148603 KRAM, WADE 150.00 COURTYARD REFUND 522458 GOLF COURSE 5401.4553 CLUBHOUSE GOLF REVENUES 150.00 448069 6/11/2020 143544 LADY A LITERARY 3,577.50 ABOUT TOWN SALES COMM FINAL 522459 #32 1130.4318 MISC RETAIL COMMUNICATIONS 3,577.50 448070 6/11/2020 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 803.84 NUTS, SCREWS, TERMINALS 522747 9307615304 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 121.31 FLAT WASHERS 522460 9307621392 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 925.15 448071 6/11/2020 134957 LEACH LAW OFFICE LLC 21,253.90 MAY STATEMENT 522746 0656.001-5/2020 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES 21,253.90 448072 6/11/2020 147378 Lee, Eunkyung 375.00 CLASS REFUND 522745 GOLF COURSE 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 375.00 448073 6/11/2020 144426 LIFE LINE BILLING SYSTEMS, LLC 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 39Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 448073 6/11/2020 144426 LIFE LINE BILLING SYSTEMS, LLC Continued... 5,537.81 522462 52688 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 139.85 522461 52689 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5,677.66 448074 6/11/2020 148598 LINDSTROM, KAY 22.00 YOGA CLASS REFUND 522850 1239657-REFUND 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 22.00 448075 6/11/2020 100858 LOGIS 1,156.25 IT CONSULTING 522743 48802 6202.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES I.T. EXPENSES 792.00 LOIGIS INVOICE 522744 48832 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 3,805.00 LOIGIS INVOICE 522744 48832 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 5,534.00 LOIGIS INVOICE 522744 48832 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING INSPECTIONS 6,189.00 LOIGIS INVOICE 522744 48832 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 7,814.00 LOIGIS INVOICE 522744 48832 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 8,004.00 LOIGIS INVOICE 522744 48832 1170.6160 DATA PROCESSING HUMAN RESOURCES 7,607.00 LOIGIS INVOICE 522744 48832 5902.6160 DATA PROCESSING UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 2,045.00 LOIGIS INVOICE 522744 48832 6202.6160 DATA PROCESSING I.T. EXPENSES 2,047.00 LOIGIS INVOICE 522744 48832 6202.6188 TELEPHONE I.T. EXPENSES 2,083.00 LOIGIS INVOICE 522744 48832 6202.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT I.T. EXPENSES 47,076.25 448076 6/11/2020 148609 LP, LAURA 19.64 522463 1130046-REFUND 1000.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 75.00 522463 1130046-REFUND 1600.4722.08 SHELTER BUILDING RENT PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 186.00 522463 1130046-REFUND 1000.2065 DEPOSITS PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 280.64 448077 6/11/2020 141916 LUPULIN BREWING 130.00 23143 522612 29421 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 130.00 448078 6/11/2020 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 521.47 MANIFORD ASY 522742 P21533 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 310.39 CYLINDER 519932 P27056 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 326.52 CYLINDERS 519970 P27223 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 2,111.48-CREDIT MEMO 519971 P27256 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 40.66 STRAINER 520787 P27543 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 18.54 CONNECTORS 520792 P27571 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 158.29 HUBS, BEARIN CONES AND CUPS 521337 P27614 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 40Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 448078 6/11/2020 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC.Continued... 348.67 SPRINGS 521928 P27705 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 324.33 SWEEPER PARTS 521366 P27706 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 261.49 MIRROR 522741 P27763 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 198.88 448079 6/11/2020 146117 MAJEWSKI, AMY K 420.00 INSTAGRAM CONSULTING 522464 #00009 6202.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT I.T. EXPENSES 420.00 448080 6/11/2020 148602 MALCOM, BRENT 75.00 COURTYARD REFUND 522465 GOLF COURSE 5401.4553 CLUBHOUSE GOLF REVENUES 75.00 448081 6/11/2020 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 9,214.98 UNLEADED GAS 522466 865598 6102.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 9,214.98 448082 6/11/2020 100869 MARTIN-MCALLISTER 550.00 PRE-EMP EXAM-PD 522467 13332 1170.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS HUMAN RESOURCES 550.00 448083 6/11/2020 148589 MASON, JOANNE 22.00 YOGA CLASS REFUND 522845 1210163-REFUND 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 22.00 448084 6/11/2020 122554 MATHESON TRI-GAS INC. 80.00 OXYGEN - ST. 1 522468 21766421 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 80.00 448085 6/11/2020 148594 MATTISON, MARIE 22.00 YOGA CLASS REFUND 522837 1207130-REFUND 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 22.00 448086 6/11/2020 141215 MAVERICK WINE LLC - PREV NEGOCE 6.00 23247 522613 INV448099 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 919.86 23247 522613 INV448099 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 925.86 448087 6/11/2020 148610 MCAWLEY, EILEEN 11.29 522469 1130067-REFUND 1000.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 41Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 448087 6/11/2020 148610 MCAWLEY, EILEEN Continued... 150.00 522469 1130067-REFUND 1600.4722.09 ROSLAND RENTAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 161.29 448088 6/11/2020 148596 MCGONAGLE, MARILYN 11.00 YOGA CLASS REFUND 522838 1210604-REFUND 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 11.00 448089 6/11/2020 146040 MEGA BEER LLC 355.00 23199 522616 2857 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 355.00 23197 522614 2858 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 387.65 23351 522615 2859 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,097.65 448090 6/11/2020 101483 MENARDS 153.80 LUMBER 522470 17084 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 48.30 LR SUPPLIES 522797 17185 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 86.16 CONSTRUCTION ADHESIVE 522796 17424 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 13.99 PLEXIGLAS 522799 17434 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 42.90 522794 17471 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 638.94 522795 17474 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 984.09 448091 6/11/2020 101987 MENARDS 43.41 MAINT. SUPPLIES 522798 98638 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 43.41 448092 6/11/2020 102281 MENARDS 74.35 BREAKROOM SUPPLIES 522800 23382 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 90.44 SUPPLIES 522801 23449 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 164.79 448093 6/11/2020 100883 MESSERLI & KRAMER 6,250.00 LOBBYING SERVICES 522802 380574 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 6,250.00 448094 6/11/2020 100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 477,269.10 ELECTRONIC PAY 522471 SAC MAY 2020 1495.4307 SAC CHARGES INSPECTIONS 477,269.10 448095 6/11/2020 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 42Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 448095 6/11/2020 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE Continued... 23.72 LAMP ASY 521419 519085 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 233.68 SEAT BELT 521930 519281 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 6.06 NUT AND BOLT 522472 519316 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 2.76 NUT 522473 519322 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 18.54 GASKET 522474 519325 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 1,724.52 REPLACEMENT SQUAD RIMS 522475 519413 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 252.42-CREDIT MEMO 521357 CM518709 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 72.17-CREDIT MEMO 521350 CM518917 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 1,684.69 448096 6/11/2020 148592 METZGER, RUTHANN 33.00 YOGA CLASS REFUND 522839 1206332-REFUND 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 33.00 448097 6/11/2020 104650 MICRO CENTER 759.98 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 522476 8135391 6202.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT I.T. EXPENSES 759.98 448098 6/11/2020 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 62.62 522803 00060783 7413.6545 CHEMICALS PSTF FIRE TOWER 62.62 448099 6/11/2020 102770 MINNESOTA CASTERS INC. 55.96 REPLACEMENT CART WHEELS 522477 24045 6102.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 55.96 448100 6/11/2020 149244 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 40.00 HOSPITALITY FEE 522739 06082020.1 5520.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA CONCESSIONS 40.00 448101 6/11/2020 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 1,141.00 522479 29775 1490.6575 PRINTING PUBLIC HEALTH 91.58 POSTCARD FOR ADDISON NEW SFD 522478 29794 1495.6575 PRINTING INSPECTIONS 1,232.58 448102 6/11/2020 100898 MINVALCO 359.50 REPAIR PARTS ST. 1 522738 195710 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 28.09 HP 2 MATERIAL 522737 196107 6303.6530 REPAIR PARTS PUBLIC WORKS EXPENSES 387.59 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 43Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 448103 6/11/2020 146671 MJV SERVICES, LLC Continued... 91.40 GRAFFITI RAMPS 522480 1009-3226 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 91.40 448104 6/11/2020 140955 MODIST BREWING LLC 192.00 23299 522617 E-13902 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 192.00 448105 6/11/2020 148606 MORRIS, CYNTHIA 75.00 COURTYARD REFUND 522481 GOLF COURSE 5401.4553 CLUBHOUSE GOLF REVENUES 75.00 448106 6/11/2020 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 131.36 REPLACEMENT TIRE 522482 1259046-00 6102.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 131.36 448107 6/11/2020 148590 NAISTAT, BEVERLY 11.00 YOGA CLASS REFUND 522840 1202174-REFUND 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 11.00 448108 6/11/2020 100920 NAPA AUTO PARTS 26.98 LIGHT BULBS 522483 2122-600601 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 63.24 HOSE 522485 2122-600800 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 42.37 WINDOW WASH BUCKET AND SQUEEGE 522484 2122-601060 6102.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 132.59 448109 6/11/2020 121233 NARDINI FIRE EQUIPMENT 336.50 FIRE SYSTEM REPAIR 522486 IN00139879 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE 398.50 IT SUP SUPRESSION SYS TEST 522736 IN00141654 6302.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL EXPENSES 735.00 448110 6/11/2020 104078 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES 4,002.00 NLC MEMBERSHIP DUES 522735 168545 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 4,002.00 448111 6/11/2020 127547 NEAL, SCOTT H. 92.98 SCOTT NEAL VERIZON APRIL 2020 522734 4037366003 1120.6188 TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION 92.98 448112 6/11/2020 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 4.00 23210 522620 157755 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 44Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 448112 6/11/2020 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO.Continued... 244.00 522620 157755 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 390.00 23237 522618 157756 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4.00 23258 522619 157757 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 392.00 23258 522619 157757 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,034.00 448113 6/11/2020 115616 NORTH IMAGE APPAREL INC. 384.00 UNIFORM SHIRTS, JACKETS 522487 NIA14162 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 384.00 448114 6/11/2020 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 144.98 OFFICE SUPPLIES 522732 0445756260001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 51.55 OFFICE SUPPLIES 522731 0451332360001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 53.45 OFFICE SUPPLIES 522491 445946239001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 222.76 OFFICE SUPPLIES 522490 447833176001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 106.38 OFFICE SUPPLIES 522488 486933611001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 123.51 OFFICE SUPPLIES 522489 497732703001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 133.31 OFFICE SUPPLIES 522733 502964296001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 835.94 448115 6/11/2020 102712 OFFICE OF MN.IT SERVICES 299.40 522496 W20040577 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 299.40 448116 6/11/2020 100936 OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE, INC. 234.68 360 HOOK AND STRAPS 522730 655951 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 53.40 522804 656002 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 288.08 448117 6/11/2020 148593 OLSON, SALLY 11.00 YOGA CLASS REFUND 522841 1210592-REFUND 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 11.00 448118 6/11/2020 101659 ORKIN 149.47 CITY HALL PEST 522805 195862603 6302.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL EXPENSES 149.47 PEST CITY HALL 522806 197225402 6302.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL EXPENSES 142.36 PW PEST 522497 198271539 6303.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC WORKS EXPENSES 441.30 448119 6/11/2020 139304 OSSEO CONSTRUCTION CO. LLC 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 45Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 448119 6/11/2020 139304 OSSEO CONSTRUCTION CO. LLC Continued... 70,300.00 1ST PAYMENT CC TOWER 522498 T21.120230 05589.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Community Center Water Tower 70,300.00 448120 6/11/2020 129214 OUVERSON SEWER AND WATER INC. 7,405.00 3921 W 58TH UTILITY UPGRADE 522807 5744 04456.1705.17 UTILITY COORDINATION West 58th Street 7,065.00 3924 W 58TH UTILITY UPGRADE 522808 5745 04456.1705.17 UTILITY COORDINATION West 58th Street 14,470.00 448121 6/11/2020 133554 PAUL J. DONNAY THREE LLC 10,000.00 REFUND ESCROW FOR NEW SFD 522499 ED172190-REFUND 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 10,000.00 448122 6/11/2020 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 10.50 23253 522621 91486 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 712.70 23253 522621 91486 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.25 23205 522622 91492 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 79.00 522622 91492 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 445.70 23231 522623 91611 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,250.15 448123 6/11/2020 145947 PEBBLE CREEK CUSTOM HOMES 10,000.00 ESCROW REFUND FROM NEW SFD 522809 ED171630-REFUND 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 10,000.00 448124 6/11/2020 149228 PEICHEL, LAUREN 95.88 522810 00123233-012031 3008 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 95.88 448125 6/11/2020 141258 PEMBER COMPANIES INC. 969.00 PAY #1 522500 ENG 20-6 1321.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 46,192.08 PAY #1 522500 ENG 20-6 07154.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS City Hall Speed Bump Project 6,265.25 PAY #1 522500 ENG 20-6 2710.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CAS ADMINISTRATION 27,055.29 PAY #1 522500 ENG 20-6 04461.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS STS-461 80,481.62 448126 6/11/2020 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 3,657.20 23048 522624 6038563 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,977.37 23115 522636 6038564 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 19.04 23071 522625 6039013 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 46Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 448126 6/11/2020 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS Continued... 1,924.69 23071 522625 6039013 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6,530.95 23346 522628 6041540 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 14.28 23345 522632 6041541 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,344.00 522632 6041541 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 13.09 23203 522631 6041542 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,150.75 522631 6041542 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4.76 23213 522629 6041543 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 614.30 522629 6041543 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 38.40 23315 522630 6041544 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5.95 23241 522635 6041545 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 610.34 23241 522635 6041545 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 61.90 23321 522634 6041546 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 21.39 23251 522633 6041547 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,179.75 23251 522633 6041547 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 449.89 23228 522627 6041548 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 330.57 23220 522626 6041549 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 20,948.62 448127 6/11/2020 102423 PLAISTED COMPANIES INC 1,395.89 INFIELD 522501 33200 1642.6542 INFIELD MIXTURE FIELD MAINTENANCE 1,395.89 448128 6/11/2020 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 206.25 TIRES FOR GOLF CART 522502 210472693 6102.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 3,816.60 REPLACEMENT TRUCK TIRES 522503 210473669 6102.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 4,022.85 448129 6/11/2020 131291 PPG ARCHITECTURAL FINISHES 342.44 PAINT 522504 #985103111584 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 342.44 448130 6/11/2020 129706 PREMIUM WATERS INC. 12.50 WATER 522811 31755928 5710.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 12.50 448131 6/11/2020 108875 PRESCRIPTION LANDSCAPE 304.47 CORNELIA SPRAY 522813 30946 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 222.22 ARNESON SPRAY 522505 30948 1643.6546 WEED SPRAY Greenhouse and horticulture 1,007.35 HIGHLANDS SPRAY 522812 30950 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 1,534.04 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 47Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 448131 6/11/2020 108875 PRESCRIPTION LANDSCAPE Continued... 448132 6/11/2020 125055 PRONTO HEATING AND AIR COND 68.58 MECH REFUND 80%522830 ED178584-REFUND 1495.4115 MECHANICAL PERMITS INSPECTIONS 68.58 448133 6/11/2020 123078 QUALIFIED LABORATORIES INC. 326.00 CITY HALL CLEANING 520324 58642 6302.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL EXPENSES 2,874.40 HAND SANITIZER 522727 58673 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 623.00-PW SUPPLY CREDIT 520325 CM58587 6303.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC WORKS EXPENSES 2,577.40 448134 6/11/2020 133091 RANGE SERVANT AMERICA INC. 868.35 RANGE KEYS 522726 99430 5424.6590 RANGE BALLS RANGE 868.35 448135 6/11/2020 100975 RED WING SHOE STORE 199.74-SAFETY BOOT RETURN 522725 268-1-78596 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 134.84 SAFETY BOOTS 522723 268-1-78665 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 200.00 SAFETY BOOTS 522722 268-1-79015 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 200.00 SAFETY BOOTS 522721 268-1-79016 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 199.74 SAFETY BOOTS 522724 268-1-79021 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 186.99 SAFETY BOOTS 522506 268-1-79022 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 721.83 448136 6/11/2020 148246 REED, CARMEN 550.00 REFUND ON AUGUST 23 RENTAL 520653 1158773-REFUND 5751.4555 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK CENTENNIAL LAKES REVENUE 550.00 448137 6/11/2020 125936 REINDERS INC. 1,781.41 FERTILIZER 522507 3069009-01 5765.6540 FERTILIZER PROMENADE EXPENSES 1,781.41 448138 6/11/2020 102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 260.76 BRAKE CONTROL, HITCH PINS 522508 1928322500 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 46.41 HITCH ADAPTERS 522509 1928322501 6102.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 879.97 HIGH SPEED JACK 522720 1928323381 6102.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 1,187.14 448139 6/11/2020 148604 ROGERS, TANYA 75.00 COURTYARD REFUND 522510 GOLF COURSE 5401.4553 CLUBHOUSE GOLF REVENUES 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 48Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 448139 6/11/2020 148604 ROGERS, TANYA Continued... 75.00 448140 6/11/2020 149238 ROLOFF, NATALIE 93.57 522831 AMBULANCE REFUND 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 93.57 448141 6/11/2020 144553 SALTCO MSP LLC 78.75 SOFTNER SALT 522832 41119 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 78.75 448142 6/11/2020 101431 SCAN AIR FILTER INC. 3,325.50 HVAC FILTERS 522511 148938 6303.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC WORKS EXPENSES 3,325.50 448143 6/11/2020 101106 SERVICEMASTER 1,650.00 RAMP TRASH ROOM CLEANOUT 522512 64677 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 1,650.00 448144 6/11/2020 149229 SEVER, FRANCES 72.93 522834 00104186-034073 2005 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 72.93 448145 6/11/2020 104098 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP 1,543.85 CRIME ANALYST SOFTWARE 522835 B11815482 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,543.85 448146 6/11/2020 120784 SIGN PRO 242.25 GLASS COVERING 522514 15211 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 198.68 A-FRAME SIGNS 522513 15213 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 202.76 COVID SIGNS 522515 15231 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 365.32 COVID SIGNS 522516 15232 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 674.80 COVID SIGNS 522517 15236 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 1,683.81 448147 6/11/2020 143968 SIMENSON, FORREST & KAROLINA 19.64 522518 1129905-REFUND 1000.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 75.00 522518 1129905-REFUND 1600.4722.08 SHELTER BUILDING RENT PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 186.00 522518 1129905-REFUND 1000.2065 DEPOSITS PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 49Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 448147 6/11/2020 143968 SIMENSON, FORREST & KAROLINA Continued... 280.64 448148 6/11/2020 136716 SIR LINES-A-LOT INC. 6,180.00 THERMO CROSSWALK 522519 H20-0491-002 1335.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PAVEMENT MARKINGS 6,180.00 448149 6/11/2020 137482 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 456.68 IRRIGATION PARTS 522520 100089644-001 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 35.46 IRRIGATION PARTS 522521 100238891-001 1653.6530 REPAIR PARTS SENIOR CENTER MAINTENANCE 492.14 448150 6/11/2020 149239 SLEEP NUMBER -SELECT COMFORT CORPORATION 2,247.98 SAFER GRANT SLEEPING ACCOMMODA 522833 66903180 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,247.98 448151 6/11/2020 132195 SMALL LOT MN 5.00 23082 522814 MN36391 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 96.00 23082 522814 MN36391 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 101.00 448152 6/11/2020 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 3,212.40 23027 522637 1955059 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 62.40 23045 522646 1955060 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,150.00 23045 522646 1955060 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.60 23337 522643 1958050 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 351.00 522643 1958050 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8.00 23214 522644 1958051 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,716.82 522644 1958051 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 13.60 23338 522647 1958053 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,240.00 522647 1958053 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 19.20 23339 522648 1958054 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,248.00 522648 1958054 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET .80 23214 522645 1958055 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1.00 23343 522638 1958058 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1.73 23333 522640 1958059 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 408.50 23333 522640 1958059 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET .80 23242 522639 1958060 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 149.45 23242 522639 1958060 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4.00 23322 522642 1958061 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 130.00 23322 522642 1958061 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 50Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 448152 6/11/2020 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS Continued... 5.60 23179 522641 5057542 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 971.40 23179 522641 5057542 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 15,696.30 448153 6/11/2020 141066 SOUTHWEST LAWN & SNOW 1,296.00 LAWN SERVICE 522522 1787 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 144.00 LAWN SERVICE 522522 1787 5553.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 1,440.00 448154 6/11/2020 105193 SPAIN, MARK 79.31 CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 522836 FLEET FARM REIMBURSEMENT 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 79.31 448155 6/11/2020 101004 SPS COMPANIES INC. 35.69 BACKFLOW PREVENTOR 522815 S3984711.001 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 93.79 REPLACEMENT PIPE 522523 S3987637.001 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 129.48 448156 6/11/2020 145599 SSI MN TRANCHE 1, LLC 1,584.82 522816 2019000604 5420.6185 LIGHT & POWER CLUB HOUSE 2,169.84 522816 2019000604 5420.6185 LIGHT & POWER CLUB HOUSE 33,769.04 522816 2019000604 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 260.40 522816 2019000604 5761.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 350.21 522816 2019000604 5761.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 603.01 522816 2019000604 5761.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 1,856.44 522816 2019000604 5860.6185 LIGHT & POWER VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 1,933.92 522816 2019000604 5840.6185 LIGHT & POWER LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 2,204.38 522816 2019000604 5820.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50TH STREET GENERAL 44,732.06 448157 6/11/2020 146960 STACKED DECK BREWING 108.00 23305 522650 847 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 156.00 23292 522649 848 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 264.00 448158 6/11/2020 100438 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC. 5,800.00 6600 FRANCE TIF INSPECTION 522817 1657953 9210.2066 ESCROW DEPOSITS HRA ADMINISTRATION 5,800.00 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 51Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 448159 6/11/2020 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC Continued... 99.00 23300 522651 34364 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 288.00 23283 522652 34365 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 387.00 448160 6/11/2020 124029 STERICYCLE 81.88 SHRED-IT SERVICES 522524 8129819187 6202.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES I.T. EXPENSES 81.88 448161 6/11/2020 148591 STEVENS, DORIS 11.00 YOGA CLASS REFUND 522842 1206321-REFUND 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 11.00 448162 6/11/2020 149218 STROLBEL, ERIC 82.52 522719 00097574-015111 7001 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 82.52 448163 6/11/2020 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 145.88 TAIL LAMP 522525 50941 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 145.88 448164 6/11/2020 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. 361.60 TIRES 522526 10170432 6102.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 221.84 TIRES 522527 10170463 6102.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 428.80 TIRES 522718 10170468 6102.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 1,012.24 448165 6/11/2020 149227 SULLIVAN, JOSEPH 53.45 522717 00105460-033276 6001 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 53.45 448166 6/11/2020 147028 SUMMERFIELD, SHEILA 22.00 YOGA CLASS REFUND 522843 1210269-REFUND 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 22.00 448167 6/11/2020 140148 SUMMIT COMPANIES 330.00 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM INSPECTION 522716 1521461 5511.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 330.00 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 52Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 448168 6/11/2020 142259 SUNBELT RENTALS, INC.Continued... 609.23 LIFT INSPECTION & REPAIR 522714 101340281-0001 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,254.30 LIFT INSPECTION & REPAIR 522715 101340573-0001 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 65.73 LIFT INSPECTION & REPAIR 522715 101340573-0001 5553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 1,929.26 448169 6/11/2020 149237 SUNDBY, THOMAS 93.11 522713 EDINAAMBULANCE 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 93.11 448170 6/11/2020 139694 SUSTAINABLE 9 DESIGN AND BUILD 10,000.00 ESCROW REFUND FOR NEW SFD 522712 ED169715-REFUND 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 10,000.00 448171 6/11/2020 147183 TELOS, LLC 1,000.00 ESCROW REFUND REMAINDER NEWSFD 522549 ED167825-REFUND #2 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 1,000.00 448172 6/11/2020 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL INC. 254.50 CC MINUTES 5/19 522711 M25655 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 254.50 PC MINUTES 5/13 522711 M25655 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 509.00 448173 6/11/2020 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 34.04 WELDING GAS 522710 40119630 6102.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 34.04 448174 6/11/2020 124753 TOSHIBA FINANCIAL SERVICES 170.96 COPIER 522818 5010418182 7410.6575 PRINTING PSTF ADMINISTRATION 170.96 448175 6/11/2020 149225 TRITECH SOFTWARE SYSTEMS 240.00 522819 258881 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 240.00 448176 6/11/2020 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE CO. 2,500.00 HANDICAP DOOR CLOSER 522820 PS10097764 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 2,500.00 448177 6/11/2020 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 53Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 448177 6/11/2020 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO.Continued... 73.25 SEED 522821 47091 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT DISTRIBUTION 73.25 448178 6/11/2020 148587 TWIN TOWN DEMOLITION LLC 4,250.00 SOUTH GRINDER RENTAL 522822 3667 5521.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ICE MAINT 9,350.00 SOUTH FLOOR FINISHING 522823 3668 5521.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ICE MAINT 13,600.00 448179 6/11/2020 140009 U.S. KIDS GOLF 171.83 MERCHANIDSE 522528 IN1392683 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 171.83 448180 6/11/2020 149234 ULLOM, CAROLINE 125.00 CLASS REFUND 522824 GOLF COURSE 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 125.00 448181 6/11/2020 144033 USS MINNESOTA ONE MT LLC 6,556.09 522529 2019000649 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 6,556.09 448182 6/11/2020 144209 VENN BREWING COMPANY LLC 87.00 23308 522653 1707 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 87.00 23310 522654 1708 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 174.00 448183 6/11/2020 148581 VICTORSEN, VEOWN 42.33 522530 00115720-011030 2039 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 44.39 522531 00116721-011030 2020 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 86.72 448184 6/11/2020 149231 VICTORSEN, VEOWN 52.11 522825 00120118-011030 2002 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 145.00 522826 00120118-011032 011 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 197.11 448185 6/11/2020 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC. 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 54Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 448185 6/11/2020 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC.Continued... 420.25 CAHILL MONUMENT LIGHTS 522532 S003639727.001 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 238.30 TAPS 522533 S003654678.001 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 265.64 FISH TAPE BS 522828 S003662203.001 1321.6556 TOOLS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 375.84 CENER RAMP WAYFIND 522828 S003662203.001 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 1,501.01 WEST DEHUMIDIFIER 522708 S003664605.001 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 29.88 WEST DEHUMIDIFIER 522827 S003666693.001 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 233.97 WEST DEHUMIDIFIER 522709 S003668590.001 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 19.17 PRAIRIE RESTORATION STATION 1.522707 S003673589.001 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 3,084.06 448186 6/11/2020 119454 VINOCOPIA 7.50 23088 522656 257424 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 342.62 23088 522656 257424 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 14.00 23325 522655 257908 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 287.75 23325 522655 257908 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 651.87 448187 6/11/2020 135181 WATERFORD OIL COMPANY INC. 1,068.01 GAS AND DIESEL AT MAINTENANCE 522706 100506 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,068.01 448188 6/11/2020 108597 WEEKS, DEANNA 11.00 YOGA CLASS REFUND 522844 1050417-REFUND 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 11.00 448189 6/11/2020 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 8.25 23081 522660 142840 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,004.00 23081 522660 142840 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8.40 23211 522658 143296 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 760.00 522658 143296 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,174.85 23239 522657 143297 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 9.90 23260 522659 143298 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 748.00 23260 522659 143298 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,713.40 448190 6/11/2020 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 27.37 23342 522662 7286266 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,596.00 522662 7286266 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,150.71 23234 522661 7286267 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 20.23 23255 522663 7288288 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 55Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 448190 6/11/2020 101312 WINE MERCHANTS Continued... 1,644.00 23255 522663 7288288 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5,438.31 448191 6/11/2020 130471 WINFIELD SOLUTIONS LLC 8,193.27 FUNGICIDES 522704 63491968 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 5,914.94 HERBICIDES/GROWTH REGULATORS 522537 63491969 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 7,199.87 SLOW RELEASE FWY FERT 522536 63491970 5422.6540 FERTILIZER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 4,913.58 GROWTH REGULATOR/FUNGICIDES 522535 63491971 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 5,399.91 SLOW RELEASE FWY FERT 522534 63503911 5422.6540 FERTILIZER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 680.31 HERBICIDE 522705 63855068 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 32,301.88 448192 6/11/2020 124503 WINSUPPLY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 2.46 RECEPTACLES 522538 194792 01 6302.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL EXPENSES 111.98 MISC MATERIAL 522702 195009 01 1330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TRAFFIC SIGNALS 4.39 SOUTH RAMP TRASH ELECT 522703 195080 01 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 118.83 448193 6/11/2020 118395 WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP INC. 476.35 NY HOOKS FOR AMBULANCES 522701 E1953997 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 476.35 448194 6/11/2020 142220 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY 212.70 23130 522666 2239 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 155.70 23287 522664 2244 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 90.00 23302 522665 2245 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 458.40 448195 6/11/2020 143452 WRS IMPORTS 2.50 23248 522667 2598 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 270.00 23248 522667 2598 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 272.50 448196 6/11/2020 101091 ZIEGLER INC 120.33 GASKETS 522700 05R027206-DUPLI CATE 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 120.33 448197 6/11/2020 149213 ZIMPRICH, ANN 19.64 522699 1130100-REFUND 1000.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 6/10/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:27:22R55CKR2LOGIS101 56Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/11/20206/4/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 448197 6/11/2020 149213 ZIMPRICH, ANN Continued... 75.00 522699 1130100-REFUND 1600.4722.08 SHELTER BUILDING RENT PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 186.00 522699 1130100-REFUND 1000.2065 DEPOSITS PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 280.64 1,850,210.99 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Checks 1,850,210.99 Total Payments 1,850,210.99 5/27/2020CITY OF EDINA 17:15:51R55CKS2LOGIS100 1Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 5/9/20205/9/2020 - Company Amount 6,799.3401000GENERAL FUND 50.0002300POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 11,461.4904000WORKING CAPITAL FUND 65.5505100ART CENTER FUND 3,806.9605400GOLF COURSE FUND 20.0005500ICE ARENA FUND 706.8005700EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 1,179.2805750CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 4,213.1605800LIQUOR FUND 5.61-05900 UTILITY FUND 560.0205930STORM SEWER FUND 2,441.8706100EQUIPMENT OPERATIONS ISF 5,384.8906200Information Technology ISF 629.4007400PSTF AGENCY FUND 418.4307500MN TASK FORCE 1 FUND Report Totals 37,731.58 5/27/2020CITY OF EDINA 17:15:47R55CKR2LOGIS101 1Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/9/20205/9/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 20200509 5/9/2020 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD 451.38 RECTIVITY BOXES 520848 AMANDA 4/17/2020 132 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER Supplier 132722 ULINE - PCARD 344.86 RECTIVITY MAY BOXES 520849 AMANDA 4/17/2020 133 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER Supplier 139861 OTC BRANDS INC - PCARD 259.71 RECTIVITY BOX SUPPLIES 520852 AMANDA 4/24/2020 137 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER Supplier 130673 FUN EXPRESS - PCARD 91.21 RECTIVITY BOX PAINT 520847 AMANDA 4/25/2020 134 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 69.75 RECTIVITY BOX PAINTS 520850 AMANDA 4/25/2020 135 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER Supplier 130362 TARGET - PCARD 77.42 RECTIVITY MAY BOXES 520851 AMANDA 4/25/2020 136 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER Supplier 132487 DOLLAR TREE - PCARD 261.00 1/2 PAYMENT ELEVATOR BATTERY 521581 AMY 3/27/2020 114 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE Supplier 148195 BTS*THYSSENKRUPP - PCARD 36.54 SIGN 521052 AMY 3/27/2020 115 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 31.17 WINDOW SCREEN 521053 AMY 3/28/2020 116 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE - PCARD 49.20 SCHEDULING APP 521582 AMY 4/17/2020 117 5410.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION 34.44 SCHEDULING APP 521583 AMY 4/19/2020 118 5410.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION Supplier 135907 WHENIWORK.COM - PCARD 715.00 520962 ANDERSON 4/20/2020 105 1280.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD Supplier 148193 ONLINE FLAGGER COM - PCARD 16.07-CREDIT 520857 BRIAN 4/10/2020 107 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 16.07-CREDIT 520856 BRIAN 4/10/2020 108 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 147976 AUDIBLE*048BJ6PB3 - PCARD 149.00 521030 BRIAN 4/15/2020 1280.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 5/27/2020CITY OF EDINA 17:15:47R55CKR2LOGIS101 2Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/9/20205/9/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 20200509 5/9/2020 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued... 80 Supplier 135907 WHENIWORK.COM - PCARD 400.00-REFUND FOR CLASS 520855 BRIAN 4/21/2020 99 1640.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL Supplier 147973 INTERLOCKING CONCRE - PCARD 1,650.00 521029 BRIAN 4/23/2020 81 1280.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD Supplier 135907 WHENIWORK.COM - PCARD 13.94 PARTS 520853 BRIAN 4/24/2020 100 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE Supplier 130421 THE HOME DEPOT - PCARD 220.01 MOWER PARTS 520854 BRIAN 4/25/2020 101 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS MOWING Supplier 148191 AANDJ OUTDOOR POWER L - PCARD 16.07 CHARGE IN ERROR/WILL GET CREDI 520858 BRIAN 4/6/2020 106 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 147976 AUDIBLE*048BJ6PB3 - PCARD 20.00 SONTERRE BOILERS LICENSE 520862 CHRISTOPHER 4/9/2020 150 5511.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS Supplier 131007 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR - PCARD 164.51 LADDER 520914 CRAIG 3/31/2020 197 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY Supplier 130422 PAYPAL - PCARD 142.00 STORM WATER COURSE 520867 DAVE 3/27/2020 121 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING Supplier 131915 OWPSACSTATE - PCARD 330.00 ROW PERMIT 520868 DAVE 4/6/2020 122 5913.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS DISTRIBUTION Supplier 130417 HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS - PCARD 85.00-REFUND CLASS CANCELLED 520865 DAVID 3/23/2020 169 1495.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS INSPECTIONS Supplier 131007 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR - PCARD 156.37 520910 DAVID 3/26/2020 4 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 Supplier 130411 JERRY'S FOODS - PCARD 24.72 520909 DAVID 3/26/2020 5 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 Supplier 130760 COSTCO.COM - PCARD 50.14 521061 DAVID 3/26/2020 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 5/27/2020CITY OF EDINA 17:15:47R55CKR2LOGIS101 3Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/9/20205/9/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 20200509 5/9/2020 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued... 83 Supplier 130523 DAVANNI'S - PCARD 17.83 521064 DAVID 4/18/2020 86 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING Supplier 142285 SPEEDWAY 06809 NOR - PCARD 528.32 CODE BOOKS 520866 DAVID 4/2/2020 170 1495.6405 BOOKS & PAMPHLETS INSPECTIONS Supplier 130651 INT'L CODE COUNCIL INC - PCARD 50.00 520908 DAVID 4/20/2020 6 2310.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS E911 Supplier 134369 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF EMD - PCARD 27.16 521062 DAVID 4/3/2020 84 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 21.39 521063 DAVID 4/3/2020 85 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING Supplier 142285 SPEEDWAY 06809 NOR - PCARD 1.05 CHANGE OF ADDRESS FEE 520864 DAWN 3/26/2020 109 5710.6235 POSTAGE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION Supplier 130548 USPS - PCARD 39.00 WHEN I WORK CONTRACT 520863 DAWN 4/11/2020 110 5710.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION Supplier 135907 WHENIWORK.COM - PCARD 95.00 ONLINE MARKETING 520917 DEB 3/25/2020 198 7410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PSTF ADMINISTRATION Supplier 137757 CTC*CONSTANTCONTACT.COM - PCARD 79.00 ONLINE WORK ORDER SYSTEM 520916 DEB 4/16/2020 200 7410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PSTF ADMINISTRATION Supplier 145263 WORKSTRAIGHT.COM - PCARD 95.00 ONLINE MARKETING 520918 DEB 4/25/2020 201 7410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PSTF ADMINISTRATION Supplier 137757 CTC*CONSTANTCONTACT.COM - PCARD 87.10 GOOGLE ADS 520915 DEB 4/6/2020 199 7410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER PSTF ADMINISTRATION Supplier 130428 GOOGLE - PCARD 35.00 GFOA TRAINING 520869 DONALD 3/27/2020 138 1160.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FINANCE Supplier 133585 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICE - PCARD 54.12 FAUCET CONNECTOR 520912 GREG 4/1/2020 70 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 5/27/2020CITY OF EDINA 17:15:47R55CKR2LOGIS101 4Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/9/20205/9/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 20200509 5/9/2020 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued... 22.70 RANGE 520913 GREG 4/1/2020 71 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE Supplier 131611 JERRYS DO IT BEST HARDWARE - PCARD 579.00 FOR 50TH AND FRANCE 520870 GUNNAR 3/26/2020 49 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE Supplier 135155 MSC - PCARD 298.95 GOLF CART PARTS 520871 GUNNAR 3/27/2020 50 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES Supplier 130422 PAYPAL - PCARD 257.95 FLOOR MATS 520978 GUNNAR 3/31/2020 51 6102.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 137.58 FLOOR MATS 520979 GUNNAR 4/1/2020 52 6102.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES Supplier 135166 WEATHERTECH MACNEIL - PCARD 218.09-RETURN PARTS 521524 GUNNAR 4/10/2020 57 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES Supplier 130422 PAYPAL - PCARD 58.89 POLICE VEHICLE PARTS 520876 GUNNAR 4/17/2020 58 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES Supplier 148186 UNITY MANUFACTURING CO - PCARD 26.05 FUEL 520874 GUNNAR 4/20/2020 59 6102.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES Supplier 130733 HOLIDAY STATION - PCARD 530.75 GOLF CART PARTS 521525 GUNNAR 4/21/2020 60 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 468.90 GOLF CART PARTS 521526 GUNNAR 4/21/2020 61 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 64.16 GOLF CART PARTS 521527 GUNNAR 4/21/2020 62 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 223.51 GOLF CART PARTS 521528 GUNNAR 4/21/2020 63 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES Supplier 130422 PAYPAL - PCARD 118.22-RETURN 520875 GUNNAR 4/24/2020 64 6102.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES Supplier 135166 WEATHERTECH MACNEIL - PCARD 1,360.00 TRAINING STEP 6 520872 GUNNAR 4/7/2020 53 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING Supplier 139922 U OF M CONTLEARNING - PCARD 149.66 REPLACEMENT RADIO 520877 GUNNAR 4/7/2020 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 5/27/2020CITY OF EDINA 17:15:47R55CKR2LOGIS101 5Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/9/20205/9/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 20200509 5/9/2020 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued... 54 Supplier 139899 CRUTCHFIELD - PCARD 363.00 COFFEE MARKER REPAIR 520873 GUNNAR 4/8/2020 55 6102.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES Supplier 146919 ESI / INTERMIX BEVERAGE - PCARD 198.78 GOLF CART REPAIR PARTS 521523 GUNNAR 4/8/2020 56 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 234.00-NTOA REFUND 520888 JACOB 3/26/2020 10 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 234.00-NTOA REFUND 520889 JACOB 3/26/2020 11 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 234.00-NTOA REFUND 520890 JACOB 3/26/2020 12 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 234.00-NTOA REFUND 520891 JACOB 3/26/2020 13 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 130422 PAYPAL - PCARD 59.95 GUN CLEANING PATCHES 520892 JACOB 3/27/2020 14 1400.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 133575 BROWNELLS INC - PCARD 275.00-BCA REFUND FOR CONFERENCE 520894 JACOB 3/27/2020 15 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 275.00-BCA REFUND FOR CONFERENCE 520895 JACOB 3/27/2020 16 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 275.00-BCA REFUND FOR CONFERENCE 520896 JACOB 3/27/2020 17 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 134736 BCA TRAINING EDUCATION - PCARD 33.84 SWAT PART FOR SHOTGUN 520893 JACOB 4/10/2020 21 1401.6551 AMMUNITION EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM Supplier 133575 BROWNELLS INC - PCARD 325.00-SOTA CONFERENCE REFUND 520903 JACOB 4/14/2020 22 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 131779 SOTA - PCARD 182.78 AIR COMPRESSON FOR PD ARMORY 520898 JACOB 4/15/2020 23 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 130404 MENARDS - PCARD 166.72 TARGETS FOR RANGE 520899 JACOB 4/16/2020 28 1400.6551 AMMUNITION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 142035 ACTION TARGETS - PCARD 325.00-SOTA CONFERENCE REFUND 520904 JACOB 4/17/2020 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5/27/2020CITY OF EDINA 17:15:47R55CKR2LOGIS101 6Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/9/20205/9/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 20200509 5/9/2020 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued... 24 325.00-SOTA CONFERENCE REFUND 520905 JACOB 4/17/2020 25 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 325.00-SOTA CONFERENCE REFUND 520906 JACOB 4/17/2020 26 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 325.00-SOTA CONFERENCE REFUND 520907 JACOB 4/17/2020 27 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 131779 SOTA - PCARD 270.00 REGISTRATION FOR 3 OFFICERS 520900 JACOB 4/25/2020 29 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 148184 U OF M ACCT REC OL - PCARD 325.00-SOTA CONFERENCE REFUND 520901 JACOB 4/4/2020 18 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 325.00-SOTA CONFERENCE REFUND 520902 JACOB 4/4/2020 19 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 131779 SOTA - PCARD 754.00 GLOCK MAGAZINE SPRINGS 520897 JACOB 4/6/2020 20 1400.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 143719 GLOCK INC - PCARD 189.95 CLUBHOUSE SUPPLIES 521043 JEFFREY 3/25/2020 34 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 56.98 NOODLES FOR CUPS/WIRE SPLICES 521044 JEFFREY 4/13/2020 35 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 31.07 POTTING SOIL/AIR FRESHNERS 521045 JEFFREY 4/15/2020 36 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 13.39 POTTING SOIL 521046 JEFFREY 4/17/2020 37 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS Supplier 130404 MENARDS - PCARD 116.92 GASKET SET FOR TRIPLEX 521047 JEFFREY 4/20/2020 38 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS Supplier 138123 JACKS SMALL ENGINES & GEN - PCARD 87.72 DISENFECTANT/ FITTINGS 521048 JEFFREY 4/20/2020 39 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 85.98 TOOLS 520982 JEFFREY 4/23/2020 152 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 130404 MENARDS - PCARD 171.78 TOOLS 520949 JEFFREY 4/23/2020 154 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 130421 THE HOME DEPOT - PCARD 5/27/2020CITY OF EDINA 17:15:47R55CKR2LOGIS101 7Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/9/20205/9/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 20200509 5/9/2020 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued... 1,043.17 FIRE HOSE 520950 JEFFREY 4/25/2020 153 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 141794 FIRE HOSE DIRECT - PCARD 115.20 BATTERIES 520948 JEFFREY 4/3/2020 151 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 146077 BATTERIES+BULBS #021 - PCARD 576.93 B&C VOLUNTEER GIFTS 521593 JENNIFER 3/25/2020 156 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 57.25 B&C VOLUNTEER GIFTS 521594 JENNIFER 3/25/2020 157 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL Supplier 146932 DENEEN POTTERY - PCARD 7.99 PICMONKEY SUBSCRIPTION 520882 JENNIFER 3/25/2020 158 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS Supplier 144859 PICMONKEY LLC - PCARD 439.00 ARCHIVESOCIAL SUBSCRIPTION 520883 JENNIFER 3/27/2020 159 6202.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT I.T. EXPENSES Supplier 136288 ARCHIVESOCIAL.COM - PCARD 180.00 VOLGISTICS MONTHLY FEE 520887 JENNIFER 3/27/2020 165 1120.6160 DATA PROCESSING ADMINISTRATION Supplier 134155 VOLGISTICS INC - PCARD 9.23 PROMOTED FACEBOOK POSTS 520884 JENNIFER 3/31/2020 160 1170.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL HUMAN RESOURCES Supplier 132896 FACEBOOK - PCARD 266.98 MAILCHIMP SUBSCRIPTION 520881 JENNIFER 4/10/2020 161 6202.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT I.T. EXPENSES Supplier 135752 MAILCHIMP - PCARD 90.80 CUSTOM FABRIC FOR FACEMASKS 520885 JENNIFER 4/14/2020 162 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS Supplier 148200 YOUCUSTOMIZEIT - PCARD 50.00 FRESHBOOKS SUBSCRIPTION 520880 JENNIFER 4/17/2020 163 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS Supplier 132480 2NDSITE FRESHBOOKS - PCARD 120.00 VALUES VIP GIFT CARDS 520879 JENNIFER 4/25/2020 164 1170.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES HUMAN RESOURCES Supplier 130362 TARGET - PCARD 10.00 YOU CAN BOOK ME MONTHLY FEE 520886 JENNIFER 4/3/2020 166 1120.6160 DATA PROCESSING ADMINISTRATION Supplier 138626 YOUCANBOOKME - PCARD 31.97 PAINT 520911 JOHN 4/10/2020 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 5/27/2020CITY OF EDINA 17:15:47R55CKR2LOGIS101 8Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/9/20205/9/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 20200509 5/9/2020 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued... 40 Supplier 130421 THE HOME DEPOT - PCARD 24.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES 520878 JOSEPH 4/10/2020 155 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION Supplier 130362 TARGET - PCARD 1,000.00 521584 JOSHUA 3/27/2020 126 5821.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 1,000.00 521584 JOSHUA 3/27/2020 126 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY 1,000.00 521584 JOSHUA 3/27/2020 126 5861.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES VERNON OCCUPANCY Supplier 148198 ADVISION ECOMMERCE I - PCARD 29.99 521586 JOSHUA 3/28/2020 125 5842.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS YORK SELLING Supplier 141664 LIGHTSPEED RETAIL INC. - PCARD 270.00 521587 JOSHUA 4/15/2020 128 5842.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS YORK SELLING Supplier 142905 LIQUID RETAILER - PCARD 29.70 521588 JOSHUA 4/20/2020 129 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 29.70 521588 JOSHUA 4/20/2020 129 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 29.70 521588 JOSHUA 4/20/2020 129 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING Supplier 135752 MAILCHIMP - PCARD 26.36 521595 JOSHUA 4/21/2020 130 5822.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 50TH ST SELLING 26.37 521595 JOSHUA 4/21/2020 130 5842.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS YORK SELLING 26.37 521595 JOSHUA 4/21/2020 130 5862.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS VERNON SELLING Supplier 135907 WHENIWORK.COM - PCARD 45.67 521589 JOSHUA 4/23/2020 131 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY Supplier 130687 FEDEXOFFICE - PCARD 119.00 521585 JOSHUA 4/7/2020 127 5822.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 50TH ST SELLING Supplier 141664 LIGHTSPEED RETAIL INC. - PCARD 49.00 IMAGES FOR VARIOUS 520920 KATHARINE 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 5/27/2020CITY OF EDINA 17:15:47R55CKR2LOGIS101 9Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/9/20205/9/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 20200509 5/9/2020 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued... 4/12/2020 124 Supplier 144168 CKO*WWW.ISTOCKPHOTO.COM - PCARD 9.99 ICONS 520919 KATHARINE 4/5/2020 123 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS Supplier 138384 NOUNPROJECT.COM - PCARD 21.62 521529 KERSTEN 3/31/2020 186 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 21.62 521529 KERSTEN 3/31/2020 186 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 21.63 521529 KERSTEN 3/31/2020 186 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING Supplier 132896 FACEBOOK - PCARD 315.00 MNCPA - KYLE 520921 KYLE 3/31/2020 102 1160.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FINANCE Supplier 148192 MINNESOTA SOCIETY OF CPA - PCARD 29.99 IDENTITY MONITORING 520922 KYLE 4/1/2020 103 1160.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FINANCE Supplier 138122 IDENTITY GUARD - PCARD 28.95 PAYPAL - E-PERMITS 520923 KYLE 4/3/2020 104 1495.6155 BANK SERVICES CHARGES INSPECTIONS Supplier 130375 PAY FLOW PRO - PCARD 95.00 CHECK RECEIVED FOR PURCHASE 521592 LISA 4/20/2020 119 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION Supplier 148196 ARCPOINT LABS OF MINEAPO - PCARD 131.64 CONSTRUCTION SUPPLIES 521054 MARY 3/26/2020 171 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION Supplier 130404 MENARDS - PCARD 54.25 COFFEE 521055 MARY 4/14/2020 172 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION Supplier 130362 TARGET - PCARD 2,585.00 HAND SANITIZER 521590 MARY 4/14/2020 173 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION Supplier 148201 IN *PARKER PROMOTIONS - PCARD .75 CC TEST 521056 MARY 4/16/2020 174 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET .75-CC TEST 521057 MARY 4/16/2020 175 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET Supplier 130530 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE - PCARD 55.00 CAKE FOR STAFF MTG 521591 MARY 4/20/2020 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 5/27/2020CITY OF EDINA 17:15:47R55CKR2LOGIS101 10Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/9/20205/9/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 20200509 5/9/2020 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued... 176 Supplier 148202 NOTHING BUNDT CAKES 82 - PCARD 47.97 COFFEE 521058 MARY 4/25/2020 177 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION Supplier 130362 TARGET - PCARD 10.74 521059 MICHAEL 4/22/2020 167 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL Supplier 130692 CUB FOODS - PCARD 328.08 521060 MICHAEL 4/24/2020 168 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL Supplier 132722 ULINE - PCARD 70.00-520927 MILLNER 4/10/2020 181 1262.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRANSPORTATION Supplier 139922 U OF M CONTLEARNING - PCARD 68.28 520928 MILLNER 4/15/2020 182 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 Supplier 130422 PAYPAL - PCARD 825.00 520929 MILLNER 4/17/2020 183 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 Supplier 148204 TATTERSALL DISTILLING - PCARD 340.70 520931 MILLNER 4/20/2020 184 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 Supplier 148205 GO PLASTICS LLC - PCARD 560.02 520930 MILLNER 4/23/2020 185 5960.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM Supplier 148206 EDINA PUBLIC WORKS - PCARD 3,232.21 520925 MILLNER 4/3/2020 179 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 Supplier 130422 PAYPAL - PCARD 4,211.52 520926 MILLNER 4/3/2020 180 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 Supplier 148203 VANTAGEONLI - PCARD 253.96 520924 MILLNER 4/4/2020 178 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 Supplier 137627 FREIGHTQUOTE.COM - PCARD 32.20 WIRELESS MOUSE 520980 NATHAN 3/29/2020 144 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION Supplier 130382 OFFICE MAX - PCARD 290.00-REFUND 520981 NATHAN 4/1/2020 5913.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS DISTRIBUTION 5/27/2020CITY OF EDINA 17:15:47R55CKR2LOGIS101 11Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/9/20205/9/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 20200509 5/9/2020 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued... 145 290.00-MIKE THOMASON REFUND 520932 NATHAN 4/1/2020 146 5913.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS DISTRIBUTION 290.00-TRAVIS I REFUND 521028 NATHAN 4/1/2020 147 5913.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS DISTRIBUTION Supplier 136148 MNAWWA - PCARD 180.19 REPAIR PARTS 520933 NATHAN 4/22/2020 148 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT Supplier 131606 FERGUSON ENT - PCARD 180.00 MATT P OUTHOUSE TRAINING 520934 NATHAN 4/23/2020 149 5913.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS DISTRIBUTION Supplier 148199 SUNCOAST LEARNING SYSTEMS - PCARD 139.38 LR LIGHTING 520943 NOAH 3/25/2020 139 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS Supplier 136752 E-CONOLIGHT - PCARD 588.00-COVID REFUND - CONF CANCELLED 520935 NOAH 3/26/2020 140 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING Supplier 146928 HILTON ADVPURCH8002367113 - PCARD 26.77 MONITOR CABLE WFH 520937 NOAH 3/28/2020 141 1321.6556 TOOLS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR Supplier 130394 BEST BUY - PCARD 40.00-COVID REFUND - CLASS CANCELLED 520936 NOAH 3/31/2020 142 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING Supplier 146082 MPLS ELECTRICAL JATC - PCARD 171.00 ASHRAE MANUAL - 3 COPIES 520938 NOAH 4/22/2020 143 1321.6556 TOOLS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR Supplier 131630 TECHSTREET - PCARD 27.49 METER 520944 PATRICIA 4/11/2020 82 5710.6235 POSTAGE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION Supplier 130400 PITNEY BOWES - PCARD 99.40 COVID MASKS 521033 PERRY 4/11/2020 98 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 123.60 COVID MASKS 521031 PERRY 4/7/2020 95 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE - PCARD 1,199.78 COVID PPE - NOTALL RCVD 521034 PERRY 4/8/2020 96 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 Supplier 148190 WRIST-BAND - PCARD 67.70 COVID MASKS 521032 PERRY 4/8/2020 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 5/27/2020CITY OF EDINA 17:15:47R55CKR2LOGIS101 12Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/9/20205/9/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 20200509 5/9/2020 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued... 97 Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE - PCARD 132.92 520939 PETER 3/30/2020 30 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION Supplier 140194 VZWRLSS*IVR VB - PCARD 7.75 520941 PETER 4/16/2020 32 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION Supplier 130548 USPS - PCARD 276.99 520942 PETER 4/19/2020 33 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE - PCARD .77 520940 PETER 4/2/2020 31 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION Supplier 130428 GOOGLE - PCARD 412.78 COSTAR 520859 ROBERT 3/26/2020 1 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING Supplier 142891 COSTAR GROUP INC - PCARD 329.00 FINANCE AND COMMERCE 520860 ROBERT 3/31/2020 2 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING Supplier 136926 FINANCE AND COMMERCE - PCARD 412.78 COSTAR 520861 ROBERT 4/25/2020 3 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING Supplier 142891 COSTAR GROUP INC - PCARD 73.93 STEPS FOR TREE 520947 ROGER 4/17/2020 111 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS Supplier 148194 SOFTPLAY LLC - PCARD 279.00 POWER WASHER 520946 ROGER 4/21/2020 113 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS Supplier 130421 THE HOME DEPOT - PCARD 146.95 LR TILE GROUT 520945 ROGER 4/22/2020 112 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS Supplier 133997 THE TILE SHOP - PCARD 252.11-TRAINING 520952 RYAN 3/24/2020 187 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 146928 HILTON ADVPURCH8002367113 - PCARD 9.92 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 520953 RYAN 3/25/2020 188 4635.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES COVID-19 Supplier 130421 THE HOME DEPOT - PCARD 749.99 TRAINING ROOM 521037 RYAN 3/25/2020 6202.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT I.T. EXPENSES 5/27/2020CITY OF EDINA 17:15:47R55CKR2LOGIS101 13Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/9/20205/9/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 20200509 5/9/2020 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued... 72 119.99 TRAINING ROOM 521038 RYAN 3/25/2020 73 6202.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT I.T. EXPENSES 49.99 TRAINING ROOM 521039 RYAN 3/25/2020 74 6202.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT I.T. EXPENSES 599.99 TRAINING ROOM 521040 RYAN 3/25/2020 75 6202.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT I.T. EXPENSES Supplier 130394 BEST BUY - PCARD 69.79 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 520954 RYAN 3/27/2020 189 4635.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES COVID-19 Supplier 130421 THE HOME DEPOT - PCARD 174.95 HEADSETS 521041 RYAN 3/31/2020 76 6202.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT I.T. EXPENSES Supplier 130394 BEST BUY - PCARD 2,835.00 ROOM SCHED DISPLAY SOFTWARE 521036 RYAN 4/12/2020 78 6202.6160 DATA PROCESSING I.T. EXPENSES Supplier 148188 TEEM TECHNOLOGIES - PCARD 110.00 521035 RYAN 4/14/2020 79 6202.6160 DATA PROCESSING I.T. EXPENSES Supplier 141645 NINITE.COM - PCARD 156.92-AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 520960 RYAN 4/3/2020 190 4635.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES COVID-19 199.52 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 520955 RYAN 4/3/2020 191 4635.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES COVID-19 156.94 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 520956 RYAN 4/3/2020 192 4635.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES COVID-19 Supplier 130421 THE HOME DEPOT - PCARD 39.00 GASBOY 521042 RYAN 4/3/2020 77 6202.6160 DATA PROCESSING I.T. EXPENSES Supplier 148187 MY SQL BACKUP FTP - PCARD 63.44 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 520957 RYAN 4/6/2020 193 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 130362 TARGET - PCARD 21.43 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 520958 RYAN 4/6/2020 194 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 148207 FLEET FARM 3200 - PCARD 60.00 AMBULANCE FLEET LICENSES 520959 RYAN 4/7/2020 195 1470.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 136146 MN EMS REG BOARD - PCARD 5/27/2020CITY OF EDINA 17:15:47R55CKR2LOGIS101 14Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/9/20205/9/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 20200509 5/9/2020 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued... 1.49 SERVICE FEE 520961 RYAN 4/7/2020 196 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 145483 EMSRB SERVICE FEE - PCARD 75.26 AV ADAPTER FOR MAC/SLING 520963 SCOTT 3/26/2020 90 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS Supplier 130394 BEST BUY - PCARD 78.95 HARD DRIVE FOR TOM CORNELL 520964 SCOTT 3/31/2020 91 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS Supplier 131597 B & H PHOTO-VIDEO.COM - PCARD 1.40-GOOGLE ADS REFUND 520966 SCOTT 4/10/2020 92 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS Supplier 130428 GOOGLE - PCARD 375.00 NATOA AWARDS 521545 SCOTT 4/17/2020 93 1130.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COMMUNICATIONS Supplier 140180 NATOA - PCARD 191.93 VOICEOVER FOR TIF PSA 520965 SCOTT 4/23/2020 94 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS Supplier 148189 FIVERR * - PCARD 16.30 521049 SHEELAN 3/25/2020 87 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 18.79 521050 SHEELAN 3/26/2020 88 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING Supplier 130733 HOLIDAY STATION - PCARD 25.00 521051 SHEELAN 4/4/2020 89 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING Supplier 146438 LS *EDINA LIQUOR - PCARD 85.00-SEMINAR REFUND 521067 STEPHEN 3/23/2020 65 1495.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS INSPECTIONS 85.00-SEMINAR REFUND 521068 STEPHEN 3/23/2020 66 1495.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS INSPECTIONS 85.00-SEMINAR REFUND 521069 STEPHEN 3/23/2020 67 1495.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS INSPECTIONS 85.00-SEMINAR REFUND 521070 STEPHEN 3/23/2020 68 1495.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS INSPECTIONS 85.00-SEMINAR REFUND 521066 STEPHEN 3/23/2020 69 1495.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS INSPECTIONS Supplier 131007 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR - PCARD 37.09 520969 SUSAN 3/26/2020 7 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 5/27/2020CITY OF EDINA 17:15:47R55CKR2LOGIS101 15Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/9/20205/9/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 20200509 5/9/2020 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued... Supplier 134733 AMAZON.COM - PCARD 20.21 520967 SUSAN 4/3/2020 8 5110.6235 POSTAGE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 8.25 520968 SUSAN 4/9/2020 9 5110.6235 POSTAGE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION Supplier 130548 USPS - PCARD 331.44 REPAIR PARTS 520970 TOM 3/24/2020 41 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING Supplier 138123 JACKS SMALL ENGINES & GEN - PCARD 164.96 GENERAL SUPPLIES 520971 TOM 3/25/2020 42 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING Supplier 148185 FLEET FARM 2500 - PCARD 13.94 MEETING 520951 TOM 3/28/2020 120 1470.6106 MEETING EXPENSE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 148197 JERRY'S KITCHEN EDINA - PCARD 380.35 PAINT AND SUPPLIES 520972 TOM 4/15/2020 43 5761.6532 PAINT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING Supplier 130421 THE HOME DEPOT - PCARD 29.00 SCHEDULING APP 520973 TOM 4/17/2020 44 5760.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE Supplier 135907 WHENIWORK.COM - PCARD 38.91 INSOLES 520976 TOM 4/17/2020 45 5760.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE Supplier 134733 AMAZON.COM - PCARD 143.98 GENERAL SUPPLIES 520974 TOM 4/21/2020 46 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING Supplier 130404 MENARDS - PCARD 36.30 INSOLES 520975 TOM 4/23/2020 47 5761.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING Supplier 132715 SPS COMPANIES - PCARD 54.34 GENERAL SUPPLIES 520977 TOM 4/25/2020 48 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING Supplier 134733 AMAZON.COM - PCARD 37,731.58 37,731.58 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Checks EFT Payments 37,731.58 Total Payments 37,731.58 Date: June 16, 2020 Agenda Item #: VI.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Jessica V. Wilson, Water Resources Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:Approve Agreement with Nine Mile Creek Watershed District to Develop Lake Level Management Plans for Arrowhead and Indianhead Lakes Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Agreement with Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. INTRODUCTION: See staff report. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report: Approve Agreement with Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Cooperative Agreement Exhibit A June 16, 2020 Mayor and City Council Jessica V. Wilson, Water Resources Coordinator Approve Agreement with Nine Mile Creek Watershed District to Develop Lake Level Management Plans for Arrowhead and Indianhead Lakes Information / Background: Arrowhead Lake and Indianhead Lake are landlocked basins located in the Indian Hills neighborhood. Landlocked lakes do not have low level outlets; the only way for water to leave the lake is through evaporation, infiltration, and/or pumping. Because there is no outlet structure, both lakes are prone to high water levels during wet years. 2019 was the wettest year on record in the Twin Cities metro area. The last six years (2014-2019) have been the wettest six-year period on record in the area. Temporary pumping from both lakes was conducted in 2019 to alleviate high water levels. City staff and the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District have put together a form of agreement to jointly develop lake level management plans for Arrowhead Lake and Indianhead Lake. The lake level management plans are intended to accomplish the following; • Define the City service. • Increase understanding of how risk is shared/transferred to the creek when pumping occurs. • Enable City staff to mobilize temporary pumping installations more rapidly and proactively manage lake levels to protect homes. • Establish a common understanding about the City’s service among the City, Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, MN Department of Natural Resources, Arrowhead Lake Association, The Indianhead Lake Association, and downstream parties. The total cost for the proposed scope of work is $30,000 to be split evenly with the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. The City’s $15,000 responsibility would be paid through the stormwater utility fund. Nine Mile Creek Watershed District-City of Edina Arrowhead-Indianhead Lake-Level Management Plans 1 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT Between Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and City of Edina Arrowhead and Indianhead Lake-Level Management Plans This agreement is made by and between the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (Edina), and Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, a watershed organization with purposes and powers set out in Minnesota Statutes chapters 103B and 103D (NMCWD), for purposes of a study of lake-level dynamics in Arrowhead and Indianhead lakes. WHEREAS the Arrowhead and Indianhead lakes lie entirely within the Nine Mile Creek watershed and the corporate limits of the City of Edina; WHEREAS both lakes are landlocked and have been subject to high water levels in recent years because of a wet climate cycle, and temporary pumping from both lakes was conducted during portions of 2019 to alleviate high water levels; WHEREAS both lakes are tributary to the south fork of Nine Mile Creek; WHEREAS minimization of risk of flooding of properties around both lakes and along the creek is within the authority and responsibility of both Edina and NMCWD; WHEREAS the NMCWD engineer has prepared a scope of work for the development of a lake-level management plan for each lake, which scope is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A (the Work); and WHEREAS Edina and NMCWD are authorized by Minnesota Statutes section 471.59 to enter into this cooperative agreement for the Work. Agreement NOW, THEREFORE, EDINA AND NMCWD enter into this agreement to document their mutual understanding as to the scope of the Work, facilitate communication and cooperation to successfully complete the Work and to share the cost of the Work. 1. Conduct of the Work a. NMCWD has approved a task order under its standing professional-services contract with the NMCWD engineer, Barr Engineering (the Engineer), to complete the Work under the direction of the NMCWD administrator for not to exceed $30,000. Notwithstanding the foregoing, NMCWD makes no warranty to Edina regarding the NMCWD engineer’s performance in overseeing the Work. b. Edina and NMCWD agree to share the right to use all work product resulting from the completion of the Work. Nine Mile Creek Watershed District-City of Edina Arrowhead-Indianhead Lake-Level Management Plans 2 c. Edina will facilitate the Engineer’s performance of the Work by all reasonable means within its administrative capacity, including but not limited to providing access to the site of the Work. If the Engineer requires entry onto private property for the purpose of the Work, Edina will assist in securing any necessary permissions, provided however nothing herein obligates NMCWD or Edina to undertake purchase or acquisition of such access or to the expenditure of any funds to acquire access to such property. 2. Cost Sharing a. NMCWD will pay the Engineer the costs of the Work as described in Exhibit A in accordance with its contract with the Engineer and applicable state law. b. On completion of the Work and within 35 days of written notification from NMCWD of NMCWD’s payment of the final from the Engineer for the Work, Edina will reimburse NMCWD 50 percent of the invoice amount, up to a total for the Work of not to exceed $15,000. c. Each party will pay its own internal, incidental and administrative costs in fulfilling its obligations and administering the terms of this agreement beyond the cost-sharing specified herein. 3. Independent relationship; liability; no warranty. This agreement does not create a joint powers board or organization within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes section 471.59, and no party agrees to be responsible for the acts or omissions of the other party pursuant to subdivision 1(a) of the statute. Only contractual remedies are available for the failure of a party to fulfill the terms of this agreement. NMCWD and Edina enter this agreement solely for the purposes of facilitating and paying for the Work. Accordingly, with respect to any and all activity undertaken pursuant to this agreement: a. Edina will hold harmless, defend and indemnify the NMCWD, its officers, employees and agents for all claims, damages, liabilities, losses and expenses asserted against either party or both parties at any time by a third party, including any governmental body, provided that any such claim, damages, loss or expense arises out of a negligent act or omission or willful misconduct of an officer, official, agent or employee of Edina; and b. NMCWD will hold harmless, defend and indemnify Edina, its officers, officials employees and agents for all claims, damages, liabilities, losses and expenses asserted against either party or both parties at any time by a third party, including any governmental body, that arise out a negligent act or omission or willful misconduct of an officer, manager, agent or employee of NMCWD. c. This agreement creates no right in and waives no immunity, defense or liability limitation with respect to any third party. The parties do not waive any the limitation of liability provided under Minnesota Statutes chapter 466. Nine Mile Creek Watershed District-City of Edina Arrowhead-Indianhead Lake-Level Management Plans 3 4. The representatives of the parties with respect to this agreement are as follows: NMCWD: Administrator Nine Mile Creek Watershed District ranhorn@ninemilecreek.org 952-835-2078 12800 Gerard Dr. Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Edina: Water Resources Coordinator City of Edina jwilson@edinamn.gov 952-826-0445 7450 Metro Blvd. Edina, MN 55439 5. Data Practices. All data created, collected, received, maintained or disseminated for any purpose in the course of this agreement are governed by the Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes chapter 13, any other applicable state statute, or any state rules adopted to implement the act, as well as federal regulations on data privacy. 6. Entire agreement. This agreement contains the complete and entire agreement between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, agreements, representations and understandings, if any, among the parties respecting such matters, and amendments, addenda, alterations, or modifications to the terms and conditions of this agreement shall be in writing and signed by both parties. The recitals stated at the outset are incorporated into and are a part of the agreement. 7. Waiver. The waiver by NMCWD or Edina of any breach or failure to comply with any provision of this agreement by either or both of the other parties will not be construed as nor will it constitute a continuing waiver of such provision or a waiver of any other breach of or failure to comply with any other provision of this agreement. 8. Term; termination. This agreement is effective on execution by both parties and will terminate on December 31, 2020, or on the written agreement of both parties, subject to the terms herein. Nine Mile Creek Watershed District-City of Edina Arrowhead-Indianhead Lake-Level Management Plans 4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused the agreement to be duly executed intending to be bounded thereby. CITY OF EDINA _______________________________ Date: _____________________ By James Hovland _____________________________ Its Mayor _____________________ _______________________________ Date: _____________________ By Scott Neal_____________________________ Its City Manager_____________________ NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT _______________________________ Date: _____________________ By Randy Anhorn Its administrator Approved as to form & execution: _____________________________ NMCWD counsel Nine Mile Creek Watershed District-City of Edina Arrowhead-Indianhead Lake-Level Management Plans 5 Exhibit A May 13, 2020, Scope of Work Barr Engineering Co. 4300 MarketPointe Drive, Suite 200, Minneapolis, MN 55435 952.832.2600 www.barr.com May 13, 2020 Randy Anhorn Jessica Vanderwerff Wilson, CMF Administrator Water Resources Coordinator Nine Mile Creek Watershed District City of Edina 12800 Gerard Drive 7450 Metro Blvd. Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Edina, MN 55439 Re: Scope of Work for Lake Level Management Plans for Arrowhead and Indianhead Lakes Dear Mr. Anhorn and Ms. Wilson: As follow-up to our April 29, 2020 meeting, and per your request, we have prepared a scope of work to develop lake level management plans for Arrowhead and Indianhead Lakes. These two lakes, located in the southwest portion of the city of Edina, are land-locked and have been experiencing high water levels in recent years due to the wet climatic cycle. Temporary pumping from both lakes was conducted during portions of 2019 to alleviate high water levels. Although land-locked, both lakes are located within the watershed tributary to the South Fork of Nine Mile Creek. Our proposed scope of work to develop the lake level management plans for Arrowhead and Indianhead Lakes is summarized below, including identification of key tasks and associated costs. The total estimated cost to complete the scope of work described below is $30,000 ($15,000 per lake).The cost is also summarized by task in Table 1. 1. Develop lake level water balance spreadsheet model A lake level water balance spreadsheet will be developed to evaluate lake level fluctuations under varying climatic conditions and analyze lake level management strategies. The existing P8 model for each watershed will be used to estimate 50+ years of inflows to each lake based on hourly precipitation data (note that while P8 is a water quality model, it also simulates runoff, which is the output that we would be using for this analysis). The lake level spreadsheet models will utilize a water balance model developed for the Normandale Lake drawdown analysis. Stage/storage information compiled for the 2020 spring snowmelt analysis will be utilized for this task. Monthly estimates of evaporation will be included in the model. The water balance model will be calibrated by comparing modeled and observed lake level data from several recent years. The calibration will help to estimate the influence of groundwater on lake levels under varying climatic conditions. Note that historic pumping for water level augmentation in these lakes may influence the results of the historic water level comparison. Estimated cost: $4,000 per lake ($8,000 total) 2. Define lake level management goals Lake level management goals will be defined in conjunction with City staff. Lake level management goals will focus on protecting primary structures and will include consideration of lake level pumping triggers to balance flood protection with minimizing downstream impacts Randy Anhorn Jessica Vanderwerff Wilson, CMF May 13, 2020 Page 2 P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327634\WorkFiles\Misc_2020\Lake Level Mgmt Scoping\Ltr_9-Mile_Edina_Scope_LakeLevelMgmtPlans_Arrowhd_Indianhd_v3.docx and avoiding unnecessary pumping. This task will include one meeting with NMCWD and City staff. Estimated cost: $2,500 per lake ($5,000 total) 3. Establish seasonal “triggers” for pumping The refined lake level model will be used to evaluate seasonal “triggers” for pumping to accommodate snowmelt runoff, rainfall runoff from large storm events and/or wet climatic periods, and lake and shoreline ecosystem health considerations. With 50+ years of inflow data, evaluation of potential triggers can include high-level probabilistic analysis (e.g., with a trigger of a given elevation, pumping would have occurred during X% of past 50 years). Estimated cost: $2,500 per lake ($5,000 total) 4. Develop recommendations for managing risks of discharging more water to Nine Mile Creek system A high-level review of flows and water levels in Nine Mile Creek upstream and downstream of the potential point(s) of discharge will be conducted under various flow scenarios (e.g., base flow, bank-full event, 10-year, 50-year, and 100-year frequency events). This information will be used to develop recommendations for managing risks of discharging additional water to the Nine Mile Creek system, which may include pumping restrictions during certain times/events. This scope assumes review of existing models; no additional modeling will be conducted. Estimated cost: $2,000 per lake ($4,000 total) 5. Share results and prepare summary document A brief lake level management plan will be developed to summarize lake level management triggers and considerations. The report will include a summary of methodology, analysis results, and management recommendations. This task includes a meeting with NMCWD and City staff to share results from Tasks 3 and 4 and discuss final recommendations. This task also includes development of a lake level management spreadsheet that can be used as a tool to guide seasonal pumping decisions. Estimated cost: $4,000 per lake ($8,000 total) Randy Anhorn Jessica Vanderwerff Wilson, CMF May 13, 2020 Page 3 P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327634\WorkFiles\Misc_2020\Lake Level Mgmt Scoping\Ltr_9-Mile_Edina_Scope_LakeLevelMgmtPlans_Arrowhd_Indianhd_v3.docx Table 1. Summary of estimated project budget, by task. Task Arrowhead Lake Indianhead Lake Total Cost for Both Lakes 1 $4,000 $4,000 $8,000 2 $2,500 $2,500 $5,000 3 $2,500 $2,500 $5,000 4 $2,000 $2,000 $4,000 5 $4,000 $4,000 $8,000 Total Costs $15,000 $15,000 $30,000 If you have any questions or comments regarding this Scope of Work please contact me at jkieffer@barr.com or 612-396-6868. We appreciate your confidence in Barr and look forward to working with you on this project. Sincerely, Janna M. Kieffer Vice President Date: June 16, 2020 Agenda Item #: VI.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Ross Bintner P.E., Engineering Services Manager Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2020-68: Resolution Accepting Ownership of Underground Utilities, Streets and Sidewalks Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2020-68, accepting ownership of underground utilities, streets and sidewalks for the Acres Dubois Development. INTRODUCTION: This action accepts ownership of the public improvements constructed in accordance with the development agreement for Acres Dubois. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2020-68: Accepting Ownership of Underground Utilities, Streets and Sidewalks RESOLUTION NO. 2020-68 ACCEPTING OWNERSHIP OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, STREETS AND SIDEWALKS WHEREAS, Paragraph 24 of the September 16, 2014 Development Contract for the Acres Dubois Addition states in part: “The Developer warrants all improvements required to be constructed by it pursuant to this Contract against poor material and faulty workmanship. The warranty period for streets ran for one year and is now complete. The warranty period for underground utilities ran for two years following completion and is now complete. The Engineering Department has conducted its final inspection and found the improvements were constructed consistent with the approved plans and specifications and recommends acceptance of the underground utilities, street and sidewalk improvements associated with the Acres Dubois development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA: The underground utilities, streets and sidewalks in the Acres Dubois Addition are accepted and will become public on the date this resolution is adopted. Passed and adopted by the Edina City Council this 16th day of June, 2020. Attest_______________________________ ________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly appointed by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of June 16, 2020, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this ________ day of ___________________, 20______. __________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk Date: June 16, 2020 Agenda Item #: VI.E. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Aaron T. Ditzler, PE, Assistant City Engineer Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: 2020 Sidewalk Improvements Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for 2020 Sidewalk Improvements with Ti-Zack Concrete, Inc., for $195,431.00. INTRODUCTION: This contract will construct sidewalks at three locations: France Avenue near the hospital, Vernon Avenue near Highway 100 and 74th Street near Public Works. See attached detailed Request for Purchase. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: 2020 Sidewalk Improvements City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Date: June 16, 2020 To: Mayor and City Council From: Aaron T. Ditzler, P.E., Assistant City Engineer Subject: Request for Purchase: 2020 Sidewalk Improvements Purchase Subject to: ☒List Quote/Bid ☐State Contract ☐Service Contract The Recommended Bid is: ☒Within Budget ☐Not Within Budget (1) – Includes Schedule A (Base Bid) only Background: Three sidewalks are proposed at the following locations: • France Avenue between Highway 62 and West 65th Street (in front of the hospital) • Vernon Avenue between Arcadia Avenue and the southbound Highway 100 entrance ramp (in front of Washburn-McReavy) • West 74th Street between Bush Lake Road and 350 feet east of Bush Lake Road. Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or expiration Date: June 4, 2020 August 4, 2020 Company: Amount of Quote or Bid (1): Ti-Zack Concrete, Inc. $195,431.00 Pember Companies, Inc. $204,759.15 Sunram Construction, Inc. $218,974.00 New Look Contracting, Inc. $222,499.50 GL Contracting Inc. $261,889.35 JL Theis, Inc. $268,295.54 Blackstone Contractors LLC $282,161.50 Meyer Contracting Inc. $284,428.64 Concrete Idea Inc $303,810.50 Urban Companies $320,704.80 Recommended Quote or Bid: Ti-Zack Concrete, Inc. $195,431.00 Page 2 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Department Director Authorization: ________________________________________ City Council Authorization Date: __6/16/20_____________ (for purchases over $20,000 only) Budget Impact This project will be funded by the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) fund. The Engineers estimate was $200,000. Spending on infrastructure projects during this pandemic has been previously mentioned. The estimated expenses are set by City Policy. Environmental Impact This project involves installing new sidewalks and pedestrian ramps. This project will create a more convenient connection for pedestrians and cyclists and potentially reduce car trips, which reduces our carbon footprint. Community Impact Three sidewalks are proposed to help fill gaps in the City’s sidewalk network and will provide safe pedestrian facilities to enhance safety and convenience. These sidewalks are identified in the Comprehensive Plan Sidewalk Facilities Map. It is necessary to comply with Vision Edina’s mission statement to “provide effective and valued public services and maintain a sound public infrastructure”. Date: June 16, 2020 Agenda Item #: VI.F. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: 50th and France Paver Replacements Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for paver replacements at the 50th and France Business District. INTRODUCTION: See attached Request for P urchase Form. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Date: June 16, 2020 To: Mayor and City Council From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Subject: Request for Purchase: 50th and France Paver Replacement Purchase Subject to: ☒List Quote/Bid ☐State Contract ☐Service Contract The Recommended Bid is: ☒Within Budget ☐Not Within Budget Pember Construction $100,571.00 Background With the work around the Nolan Mains Development Project, paver replacements have not occurred over the past 2-years. Typically, the yearly budget for assessment back to the district is $20,000. As part of the development project, the developer agreed to fund $28,000 towards paver replacements in 2020. This project will focus on replacements in the 2 areas most in need. Area 1 is the southwest corner of Market Street and France Avenue. Area 2 is the area just west of the movie theater. Work will also include pedestrian ramp installations to meet ADA requirements and storm sewer improvements to address drainage and winter icing. Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or expiration Date: 6/9/2020 8/9/2020 Company: Amount of Quote or Bid: Pember Companies, Inc. All Phase Contracting, Inc. Blackstone Contractors LLC Urban Companies Thomas and Sons Construction JL Theis, Inc. Sunram Construction, Inc. Paragon Restoration II, Inc. $100,571.00 $114,373.26 $116,235.00 $118,390.00 $119,965.00 $120,788.00 $127,965.00 $160,957.00 Recommended Quote or Bid: Page 2 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Department Director Authorization: ________________________________________ City Council Authorization Date: ______________ (for purchases over $20,000 only) Budget Impact This project will be funded by a variety of sources in the following approximate breakdown. $40,000 Maintenance Assessment to the property owners $10,000 Storm Sewer Fund $10,000 PACS Fund $28,000 Developer Contribution $12,500 Centennial Lakes TIF – requires HRA approval Environmental Impact Staff is requiring face-mix pavers that require less maintenance and tolerate the harsh salt conditions better. Old pavers will be removed and disposed of by the contractor. Community Impact The 50th and France District is a destination shopping and dining district. Keeping the paver sidewalks in good aesthetic condition is required to keep the district vibrant. New pavers reduce staff time managing repairs to failed pavers and reduces operations related to winter maintenance. Date: June 16, 2020 Agenda Item #: VI.G. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Derik Otten, Facility Manager Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Edinborough Park Asset & Energy Management Plan Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for Edinborough Asset & Energy Management Plan with Collaborative Design Group for $48,850. INTRODUCTION: In April 2020 the City published a request for proposals for a Facility Asset and Energy Management Plan for Edinborough Indoor P ark. It will provide a review of the building envelop and energy using systems. T here were 5 respondents to the request for proposals and 2 firms were interviewed. This is a one-time purchase for services. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase:Edinborough Park Asset & Energy Management Plan City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Date: June 16, 2020 To: Mayor and City Council From: Derik Otten, Facility Manager Subject: Request for Purchase: Edinborough Asset & Energy Management Plan Purchase Subject to: ☐List Quote/Bid ☐State Contract ☒Service Contract The Recommended Bid is: ☒Within Budget ☐Not Within Budget Background: In April 2020 the City published a request for proposals for a Facility Asset and Energy Management Plan for Edinborough Indoor Park. It will provide a review of the building envelope and energy using systems. There were 5 respondents to the request for proposals and 2 firms were interviewed. This is a one-time purchase for services. The plan will provide the City with itemized recommendations and improvements to the building and its mechanical equipment to improve energy efficiency and reduce energy usage. The resulting recommendations and improvements may have additional cost implications. Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or expiration Date: May 15, 2020 N/A Company: Amount of Quote or Bid: Collaborative Design Group HGA $48,850.00 $49,099.00 $48,850.00 Recommended Quote or Bid: Collaborative Design Group Page 2 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Department Director Authorization: ________________________________________ City Council Authorization Date: ______________________ (for purchases over $20,000 only) Budget Impact This contract will be funded with CAS funds. The recommended quote is within budget. Environmental Impact The services under this contract are intended to provide savings of both energy and water. The study will be using the City’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Goals as the standard for all recommended changes and improvements. The study may not provide any measurable changes but recommendations can be implemented by both outside vendors and/or city staff responsible for the operation of the building to reduce energy and water consumption. Community Impact Edinborough Park is premiere destination in the City of Edina. It provides residents of the city and surrounding communities access to play space, wellness, and educational engagement opportunities year-round in a safe environment. The assessment directly relates to the Budget Goal #1 to Maintain Physical Assets and Infrastructure and Goal 3 to Plan for Sustainable Development and Infrastructure. Date: June 16, 2020 Agenda Item #: VI.H. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Stephanie Hawkinson, Affordable Housing Development Manager Item Activity: Subject:Resolution 2020-61: Authorizing Contamination Clean Up Grant and Environmental Response Fund Grant Agreements Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2020-61 Authorizing Metropolitan Council's Tax Base Revitalization Account Contamination Clean Up Grant Program and Hennepin County Environment and Energy Department's Environmental Response Fund Grant Agreements, and Sub-Recipient Loan Agreements. INTRODUCTION: The City of Edina on behalf of MWF Properties and Amundson Flats, LP applied for and received environmental clean-up grants from the Metropolitan Council and Hennepin County. T hese grants will be used to fund environmental clean-up efforts and oversight of 7075-7079 Amundson Avenue in order for 62-units of affordable housing to be safely constructed. The Resolution was reviewed by the City Attorney to formally accept the grants. The sub-recipient loan agreements were also prepared by the sub-recipient's attorney and reviewed by City Attorney to establish the contractual relationship between the City and owners of Amundson Flats. Staff recommends approval of Resolution No. 2020-61 and the Sub-Recipient Loan Agreements. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution 2020-61 ERF Grant Agreement ERF Loan Agreement ERF Mortgage TBRA Grant Agreement TBRA Loan Agreement TBRA Mortgage Hennepin County ERF Note Met Council TBRA Note RESOLUTION NO. 2020-61 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF METROPOLITAN COUNCIL TAX BASE REVITALIZATION ACCOUNT CONTAMINATION CLEANUP GRANT PROGRAM AND HENNEPIN COUNTY ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE FUND GRANT AGREEMENTS WHEREAS, the City of Edina, on behalf of Amundson Flats, LP, has applied for and received a grant under the Metropolitan Council’s Tax Base Revitalization Account Contaminated Cleanup Grant Program in the amount of $400,500 for asbestos abatement, soil remediation and soil vapor mitigation, and related environmental oversight needed to redevelop property located at 7075-7079 Amundson Avenue in to 62 units of affordable housing. WHEREAS, the City of Edina, on behalf of Amundson Flats, LP, has applied for and received a grant under Hennepin County’s Environmental Response Fund in the amount of $247,340 contaminated soil remediation involving oversight/monitoring, characterization, disposal, associated consulting activities and associated Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) fees in accordance with the budget submitted by the Grantee in the ERF Application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Edina City Council hereby accepts Grant No. SG-13317 and Contract No. PR00001888 and authorizes and directs the Mayor and City Manager to sign the grant agreements on its behalf. Passed and adopted this 16th day of June, 2020. Attest: ______________________________ ______________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 16, 2020, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of _____________, 2020. _______________________________ City Clerk Contract No. PR00001888 ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE FUND GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF EDINA AND HENNEPIN COUNTY ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY DEPARTMENT This Agreement is between the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota (“County”) at A2300 Government Center, Minneapolis, MN 55487 by its Environment and Energy Department (“Department”) and The City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“Grantee”) with its Housing and Redevelopment Authority located at 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424. Grantee has submitted an Environmental Response Fund (“ERF”) application to the County for a grant to be used for the cleanup at the Amundson Flats project site located at 7075 and 7079 Amundson Avenue in Edina, Minnesota. The ERF application submitted by the Grantee to the County is incorporated into this Agreement by reference. The parties agree as follows: 1. GRANT AMOUNT AND COMPLETION The County shall grant to Grantee a sum not to exceed Two Hundred Forty Seven Thousand Three Hundred Forty dollars ($247,340.00) (“ERF Grant”) which funds shall be only for expenses incurred in performing activities specified in the Application and as further described in Section 14 of this Agreement or as approved by the County. Approved activities are as described in Section 14 and in the Application are referred as the “Project”. Administrative costs incurred by Grantee are not eligible for reimbursement. The Application is currently on file with the Department and available for inspection and review. Grantee shall complete the Project within two (2) years of execution of this Agreement and within the terms stated herein. Any material change in the scope of the Project, including time schedule and budget, must be approved in writing by the County. Upon approval by the County Administrator, the duration of this Agreement may be extended for up to twelve (12) months. Funds made available pursuant to this Agreement shall be used only for expenses incurred in performing such purposes and activities described in the Application and this Agreement. 2. ACCOUNTING AND RECORD KEEPING For all expenditures of funds made pursuant to this Agreement, Grantee shall keep financial records including properly executed contracts, invoices, and other documents sufficient to evidence in proper detail the nature and propriety of the expenditures. Accounting methods shall be in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The County, the State Auditor, or any of their duly authorized representatives at any time during normal business hours, and as often as they may reasonably deem necessary, shall have access to and the right to examine, audit, excerpt, and transcribe any books, documents, papers, records, etc., which are pertinent to the accounting practices and procedures of Grantee and involve transactions relating to this Agreement. Such materials shall be maintained and such access and rights shall be in force and effect during the period of the Agreement and for six (6) years after its termination or cancellation. 3. PAYMENT/DISBURSEMENT SCHEDULE County will disburse funds to Grantee pursuant to this Agreement, based on a payment request form provided by the County, submitted by Grantee and approved by the County. Payment requests can be submitted once per month and must be accompanied by supporting invoices that relate to activities in the approved Project budget. Subject to verification of adequacy of a written disbursement request and approval of consistency with this Agreement, the County will disburse the requested amount to Grantee within six (6) weeks after receipt of a written disbursement request. The final request for disbursement must be submitted within six (6) months of the expiration date of this Agreement. 4. REPORTING Grantee shall submit to the County a report on the distribution of funds and the progress of the Project covered from the date of the grant award through June 30 of each year. The reports must be received by the County no later than July 25 of each year. The report shall identify specific goals listed in the application and quantitatively measure the progress of such goals. Reporting forms will be provided by the County. In addition, the required documentation listed in Section 15 should be supplied as it becomes available. 5. CONTRACTS Grantee shall include in any contract, provisions that require contractors to comply with all applicable State and Federal laws and regulations regarding employment and workplace safety. In accordance with Hennepin County’s policies against discrimination, Grantee shall not exclude any person from full employment rights or participation in or the benefits of any program, service, or activity on the grounds of race, color, creed, religion, age, sex, disability, marital status, sexual orientation, public assistance status, or national origin; and no person who is protected by applicable Federal or State laws, rules, or regulations against discrimination shall be otherwise subjected to discrimination. Public Grantees and any contractors or subcontractors performing services as part of this Agreement shall follow that public Grantee’s Affirmative Action policy against discrimination. 6. TERMINATION, CANCELLATION AND ASSIGNMENT This Agreement automatically terminates on the expiration date of this Agreement or within sixty days of issuance of final payment on the final disbursement request, whichever is earlier. This Agreement may be canceled by the County upon sixty (60) days written notice to Grantee without cause. In the event of such cancellation, Grantee shall be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for work or services satisfactorily performed up to the effective date of such cancellation. If the County finds that there has been a failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement, that reasonable progress has not been made toward commencement or completion of the assessment and/or clean-up activities specified in the Application and this Agreement, notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement to the contrary and after written notice and reasonable opportunity to cure, the County may refuse to disburse additional funds and/or require the return of all or part of the funds already disbursed, to the extent such funds were used for purposes other than activities contemplated by this Agreement. If the County finds that there has been a violation of any state, federal or local law, the County may upon written notice immediately cancel this Agreement in its entirety and may withhold or delay payment. In the event of a decision to withhold or delay payment, the County shall furnish prior written notice to Grantee specifically identifying the reason for withholding or delaying such payment. This Agreement may not be assigned without the prior written consent of the County. 7. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR Grantee shall select the means, method, and manner of performing the Project. Nothing is intended or should be construed in any manner as creating or establishing the relationship of co-partners between the parties or as constituting Grantee as the agent, representative, or employee of the County for any purpose. Grantee shall remain an independent contractor with respect to all services and activities performed under this Agreement. Any personnel of Grantee or other persons while engaged in the performance of any work or services required by Grantee under this Agreement will have no contractual relationship with the County, and will not be considered employees of the County. The County shall not be responsible for any claims that arise out of employment or alleged employment under the Minnesota Economic Security Law or the Workers’ Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of any personnel, including, without limitation, claims of discrimination against Grantee, its officers, agents, contractors, or employees. Grantee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the County, its officials, officers, agents, and employees from all such claims irrespective of any determination of any pertinent tribunal, agency, board, commission, or court. Such personnel or other persons shall neither require nor be entitled to any compensation, rights, or benefits of any kind whatsoever from the County, including, without limitation, tenure rights, medical and hospital care, sick leave, Workers’ Compensation, Re-employment Compensation, disability, severance pay, and retirement benefits. 8. INDEMNIFICATION Subject to the limits provided for in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466, the Grantee agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless, the County, its officials, officers, agents, volunteers and employees from any liability, claims, causes of action, judgments, damages, losses, costs, or expenses, resulting directly or indirectly from any act or omission of Grantee, its contractors or subcontractors or anyone directly or indirectly employed by them, and/or anyone for whose acts and/or omissions they may be liable in the performance of the activities specified in this Agreement and against all loss by reason of the failure of Grantee to perform any obligation under this Agreement. 9. INSURANCE In order to protect the County and those listed above under the indemnification provision, Grantee agrees at all times during the term of this Agreement, to have and keep or cause to have and be kept in force, the following insurance coverages under either a purchased insurance or self-insurance program: 1. Commercial General Liability on an occurrence basis with Contractual Liability Coverage: Limits General Aggregate $2,000,000 Products-Completed Operations Aggregate 2,000,000 Personal and Advertising Injury 1,500,000 Each Occurrence – Combined Bodily Injury and Property Damage 1,500,000 2. Automobile Liability – Combined single limit each occurrence for 1,500,000 bodily injury and property damage covering owned, non-owned, and hired automobiles. 3. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: a. Workers’ Compensation Statutory If the contractor is based outside the State of Minnesota, coverage must apply to Minnesota laws. b. Employer’s Liability. Bodily Injury by: Accident – Each accident 500,000 Disease – Policy Limit 500,000 Disease – Each Employee 500,000 4. Professional Liability – Per Claim 1,500,000 Aggregate 2,000,000 5. Pollution Liability – Grantee shall maintain or cause a project contractor $2,000,000 to maintain pollution liability insurance general aggregate of at least. Grantee alone is required to meet the insurance coverages of this Agreement. Grantee may meet these coverages directly through their own insurance policies, through documentation of self-insurance determined acceptable to the County, or through a combination of Grantee and contractor or other partner insurance policies. More than one entity or contractor may be used to assist the Grantee in meeting the required coverages. Grantee shall furnish to the County copies of certificates of insurance or proof of self-insurance for the insurance coverages listed above and provide updated certificates or documentation of self-insurance as coverages expire, renew, or change through the duration of this Agreement. When the insurance is provided by the Grantee, the certificate(s) must name Hennepin County as the certificate holder and as an additional insured for the commercial general liability coverage(s) for all operations covered under the Agreement and include the project name and ERF contract number. When the insurance is not provided by the Grantee, the certificate(s) must name the Grantee as the certificate holder(s), name the Grantee and Hennepin County as an additional insured for the commercial general liability coverage(s) for all operations covered under the Agreement, and include the project name and ERF contract number. The certificate must also show that the County will receive 30 day prior written notice in the event of cancellation, nonrenewal, or material change in any described policies. If Grantee fails to furnish proof coverages, if requested by the County, the County may withhold payments and/or pursue any other rights or remedy allowed under the contract, law, equity, and/or statute. An umbrella or excess policy over primary liability coverages is an acceptable method to provide the required insurance limits. The above establishes minimum insurance requirements. It is the sole responsibility of Grantee to determine the need for and to procure additional insurance which may be needed in connection with this Agreement. Grantee and their contractors shall not commence work until they have obtained required insurance. 10. MERGER AND MODIFICATION It is understood and agreed that the entire Agreement between the parties is contained herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. All items referred to in this Agreement are incorporated or attached and are deemed to be part of this Agreement. Any alterations, variations, modifications or waivers of provisions of this Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing as an amendment to this Agreement signed by the parties. 11. MINNESOTA LAWS GOVERN The Laws of the State of Minnesota shall govern all questions and interpretations concerning the validity and construction of this Agreement and the legal relations between the parties and performance under it. The appropriate venue and jurisdiction for any litigation will be those courts located within the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota. Litigation, however, in the federal courts involving the parties will be in the appropriate federal court within the State of Minnesota. If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will not be affected. 12. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Grantee shall acknowledge the financial assistance provided by the County in promotional materials, press releases, reports and publications relating to the Project activities described in Section 14 which are funded in whole or in part with the grant funds. The acknowledgment should contain the following language: Financing for this project was provided in part by the Hennepin County Environmental Response Fund. Until the Project activities funded by this Agreement are completed, the Grantee shall ensure the above acknowledgment language, or alterative language approved the County, is included on all signs located at the Project or construction sites that identify Project funding partners or entities providing financial support for the project. Until the Project activities funded by this Agreement are completed and for one year after that date, the Grantee shall provide advance notice to the County, including an invitation to the appropriate County Commissioner’s office, of any public events related to the Project. 13. HENNEPIN COUNTY PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX AND PROPERTY TAX Grantee shall affirm or require the person or entity to which the Grantee has subgranted the funds to affirm that it and its officers have paid all Hennepin County personal property taxes and property taxes due on all of its Hennepin County properties for all taxes owed. If the County finds that property taxes have not been paid, County may refuse to disburse funds and may require the return of all or part of the funds already disbursed pursuant to Section 6 of this Agreement. This section shall not apply to any property taxes that the Sub-Grantee or any other person or entity directly or indirectly controlling the Sub-Grantee is contesting, in good faith, the existence, amount, or validity thereof, or the extent of its liability therefor, by appropriate proceedings which shall operate during the pendency thereof to prevent the collection of the real or personal property tax so contested. 14. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES The site historically was used by dry cleaning companies. Project includes demolition of current single-story vacant building and redeveloping the site with a 62-unit affordable housing apartment building. The applicant has been awarded ERF assistance for contaminated soil remediation involving oversight/monitoring, characterization, disposal, associated consulting activities and associated Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) fees in accordance with the budget submitted by the Grantee in the ERF Application. Modifications to eligible activities and costs must be requested in writing by the Grantee and approved of in writing by the County. 15. REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION AND SUBMITTALS The County requires that grant disbursement requests are submitted to the County on a County-approved disbursement form with the following supporting documentation: • Proof of meeting County insurance requirements for the complete Agreement period [see Section 9. INSURANCE]. • Annual progress summary reports that describe project status, percent of work completed, and remaining tasks and schedule. • Final environmental investigation reports generated on projects through this grant, which may include but are not limited to Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessment reports, Response Action Plan reports, asbestos and/or lead-based paint assessment reports, and lead-risk assessment reports. • Response Action Plan (RAP) and RAP Implementation Reports • Consultant and contractor invoices, including associated subcontracted services invoices and expense documentation. Documentation shall include the date(s) of service(s) covered by the invoice, unit rates, quantities, and markups. Subcontractor markups are limited to 10% or less. • Contaminated and regulated soil disposal documentation. Documentation shall include proof of unit rates, copies of manifests at a rate of one manifest per truck per load, copies of weight or load tickets, and a summary spreadsheet matching manifest numbers to weight or load tickets and final weights. • Clean fill documentation by volume in cubic yards. • MPCA approval letters. • MPCA invoices. 16. USE OF ERF GRANT AS A LOAN An ERF Grant from County to Grantee may be disbursed by Grantee to any entity as a loan specifically Amundson Flats, Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership. The Remainder Of This Page Was Intentionally Left Blank COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR APPROVAL Reviewed for COUNTY by the County Attorney's Office: {{Sig_es_:signer4:signature}} {{userstamp4_es_:signer4:stamp}} Reviewed for COUNTY by: {{Sig_es_:signer5:signature}} {{userstamp5_es_:signer5:stamp}} Document Assembled by: {{Sig_es_:signer1:signature}} {{userstamp1_es_:signer1:stamp}} {{Exh_es_:signer1:attachment:label("Attachments")}} COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA By: {{Sig_es_:signer6:signature}} {{userstamp6_es_:signer6:stamp}} GRANTEE GRANTEE warrants that the person who executed this Agreement is authorized to do so on behalf of GRANTEE as required by applicable articles, bylaws, resolutions or ordinances.* By: {{Sig_es_:signer2:signature}} {{userstamp2_es_:signer2:stamp}} {{ ttl_es_:signer2:title}} By: {{Sig_es_:signer3:signature}} {{userstamp3_es_:signer3:stamp}} {{ ttl_es_:signer3:title}} *GRANTEE represents and warrants that it has submitted to COUNTY all applicable documentation (articles, bylaws, resolutions or ordinances) that confirms the signatory's delegation of authority. Documentation is not required for a sole proprietorship. LOAN AGREEMENT THIS LOAN AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is made effective as of __________, 2020, by and between AMUNDSON FLATS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Minnesota limited partnership (“Borrower”), and CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a Minnesota statutory city (“Lender”). RECITALS: A. In cooperation with Borrower, the Lender made application (the “Application”) to and received funds in the amount of $247,340.00 from the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota (“County”) under its Environmental Response Fund Grant Program (the “ERF Grant”) pursuant to the terms of that certain Environmental Response Fund Grant Agreement by and between the Lender and the County dated as of _________, 2020 (the “Grant Agreement”), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein. Any capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meaning given to such terms in the Grant Agreement. B. Lender desires to loan proceeds of the ERF Grant in the amount of Two Hundred Forty-Seven Thousand Three Hundred Forty and no/100 Dollars ($247,340.00) (the "Loan") to Borrower pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, to assist Borrower with the development of a 62-unit rental housing project to be constructed in Edina, Minnesota (the “Project”) that has received low-income housing tax credits under Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual obligations of the parties hereto, each of them does hereby covenant and agree with the other as follows: ARTICLE I. UNDERTAKINGS OF LENDER Subject to satisfaction of the conditions set forth in Article III, Lender agrees to loan Borrower the amount of $247,340.00, the proceeds of which shall be used to pay eligible expenses incurred in performing the activities specified in the Grant Agreement (the “Project Costs”). ARTICLE II. UNDERTAKINGS OF BORROWER Section 2.1 Terms of the Loan. Borrower acknowledges that Lender is loaning the proceeds of the Loan to Borrower. The entire principal balance, plus interest, if any, shall be payable in accordance with that certain Promissory Note dated even herewith by Borrower for the benefit of Lender (the “Note”), and shall be secured by that certain Mortgage dated even herewith by Borrower for the benefit of Lender and recorded as a subordinate mortgage against the real property underlying the Project described on Exhibit A hereto (the “Property”). 2 Section 2.2 Conditions to Funding the Loan. As a condition precedent to disbursing the proceeds of the Loan, Borrower shall deliver to Lender the executed originals of this Agreement, the Note, and the Mortgage. Section 2.3 Disbursement of the Loan Proceeds. The proceeds of the Loan shall be disbursed to Borrower on a reimbursement basis to pay for incurred Project Costs, pursuant to the terms of the Grant Agreement. ARTICLE III. BORROWER COVENANTS Section 3.1 Status of Borrower; Transfer of Substantially All Assets. Borrower represents and agrees that Borrower will maintain its existence as a limited partnership and will not wind up or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of its assets during the term of the Note. Section 3.2 Release and Indemnification Covenants. (1) Borrower releases Lender from, covenants and agrees that the indemnified parties shall not be liable for, and agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Lender against, any loss or damage to property or any injury to or death of any person occurring at or about or resulting from any defect in the Project or resulting from or occurring on the Property. (2) Borrower agrees to protect and defend Lender, now or forever, and further agrees to hold Lender harmless, from any claim, demand, suit, action or other proceeding whatsoever by any person or entity whatsoever arising or purportedly arising (i) from any violation of this Agreement, the Note or the Mortgage (collectively, the “Loan Documents”) (except with respect to any suit, action, demand or other proceeding brought by Borrower against Lender to enforce its rights under the Loan Documents), (ii) the acquisition, construction, installation, ownership, and operation of the Project, or (iii) any hazardous substances located in or on the Property. (3) Lender shall not be liable for any damage or injury to the persons or property of Borrower due to any act of negligence of any person, other than any act of negligence on the part of Lender or its officers, agents, representatives, or employees. (4) All covenants, stipulations, promises, agreements and obligations of Lender contained herein shall be deemed to be the covenants, stipulations, promises, agreements and obligations of Lender and not of any governing body member, officer, agent, servant or employee of Lender in the individual capacity thereof. (5) The provisions of this Section 3.2 shall survive the termination of this Agreement. Section 3.3 Real Property Taxes. Borrower shall pay all real property taxes with respect to all parts of the Property which are payable pursuant to the provisions of any statutory or contractual duty that shall accrue until title to the Property is vested in another person; provided, 3 however, that Borrower may contest the imposition of any real property taxes or assessments in good faith. Section 3.4 Grant Agreement. Borrower shall comply with all applicable requirements contained in the Grant Agreement and submit any reporting information related to the Project that is requested by the Lender or County. ARTICLE IV. EVENTS OF DEFAULT Section 4.1 Events of Default Defined. The following shall be “Events of Default” under this Agreement and the term “Event of Default” shall mean, whenever it is used in this Agreement, any one or more of the following events: (1) Failure by Borrower to substantially observe or perform any covenant, condition, obligation or agreement on its part to be observed or performed under this Agreement, and such failure is not cured within sixty (60) days after Lender notifies Borrower in writing of such failure; provided, however, that if Borrower has commenced the cure of such default within sixty (60) days, then such sixty (60) day period shall be extended so long as Borrower is diligently pursuing the cure; or (2) Borrower shall: (a) file any petition in bankruptcy or for any reorganization, arrangement, composition, readjustment, liquidation, dissolution, or similar relief under the United States Bankruptcy Act of 1978, as amended, or under any similar federal or state law; or (b) make an assignment for the benefit of its creditors; or (c) admit in writing its inability to pay its debts generally as they become due; or (d) be adjudicated a bankrupt or insolvent; or if a petition or answer proposing the adjudication of Borrower as a bankrupt or its reorganization under any present or future federal bankruptcy act or any similar federal or state law shall be filed in any court and such petition or answer shall not be discharged or denied within ninety (90) days after the filing thereof; or a receiver, trustee or liquidator of Borrower or of the Project, or part thereof, shall be appointed in any proceeding brought against Borrower, and shall not be discharged within ninety (90) days after such appointment, or if Borrower shall consent to or acquiesce in such appointment; or (e) fail to comply with any material terms of the Grant Agreement. U.S. Bancorp Community Development Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, its successors and/or assigns, the investor limited partner of Borrower (the “Investor Limited Partner”) shall have 4 the right, but not the obligation, to cure any default or Event of Default by Borrower under this Agreement or any default under any other Loan Document, and Lender shall accept performance by Investor Limited Partner of any obligation of Borrower thereunder as though tendered by Borrower itself. The Lender agrees that the Investor Limited Partner will have ten (10) days after the Investor Limited Partner’s receipt of notice of such default to cure, or cause the cure of a monetary default under the Loan Documents, and thirty (30) days (or such longer period as is set forth in the Loan Documents) after the Investor Limited Partner’s receipt of such notice to cure any non-monetary defaults under the Loan Documents, or, as to non-monetary defaults, such longer period as is reasonably necessary for the Investor Limited Partner to cause cure, provided that cure is commenced within the above cure period and diligently prosecuted, including, without limitation, such time period as is necessary to remove Borrower’s general partner, if necessary in order to effect a cure. Upon the occurrence of any event that would become an Event of Default hereunder if not cured within any applicable cure period set forth herein, Borrower agrees to promptly provide written notice to Lender describing such event and Borrower’s plan for curing the same. Section 4.2 Remedies on Default. Whenever any Event of Default referred to in Section 4.1 of this Agreement occurs and is continuing, Lender, as specified below, may take any one or more of the following actions: (1) Lender may declare the unpaid principal of the Loan immediately due and payable; (2) Lender may exercise its rights and remedies under the Mortgage and proceed against the collateral described therein; (3) Lender may suspend its performance under this Agreement until it receives assurances from Borrower, deemed adequate by Lender, that Borrower will cure its default and continue its performance under this Agreement; or (4) Lender may take any action, including legal or administrative action, which may appear necessary or desirable to collect any payments due under this Agreement, or to enforce performance and observance of any obligation, agreement, or covenant of Borrower under this Agreement. Section 4.3 No Remedy Exclusive. No remedy herein conferred upon or reserved to Lender is intended to be exclusive of any other available remedy or remedies, but each and every such remedy shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy given under this Agreement or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity or by statute. No delay or omission to exercise any right or power accruing upon any default shall impair any such right or power or shall be construed to be a waiver thereof, but any such right and power may be exercised from time to time and as often as may be deemed expedient. Section 4.4 No Implied Waiver. In the event any agreement contained in this Agreement should be breached by any party and thereafter waived by any other party, such waiver shall be limited to the particular breach so waived and shall not be deemed to waive any other concurrent, previous or subsequent breach hereunder. 5 Section 4.5 Agreement to Pay Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses. Whenever any Event of Default occurs and Lender shall employ attorneys or incur other expenses for the collection of payments due or to become due or for the enforcement or performance or observance of any obligation or agreement on the part of Borrower herein contained, Borrower agrees that it shall, on demand therefor, pay to Lender the reasonable fees of such attorneys and such other expenses so incurred by Lender. ARTICLE V. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS Section 5.1 Titles of Articles and Sections. Any titles of the several parts, articles and sections of this Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall be disregarded in construing or interpreting any of its provisions. Section 5.2 Notices and Demands. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, a notice, demand or other communication under this Agreement by any party to any other shall be sufficiently given or delivered if it is dispatched by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, or delivered personally or via electronic mail, and (1) in the case of Borrower, is addressed to or delivered personally to Borrower at: If to Borrower: Amundson Flats, Limited Partnership 7645 Lyndale Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55423 Attention: Christopher J. Stokka Email: ChrisStokka@mwfproperties.com With a copy to: Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A. 225 S. Sixth Street, Ste. 3500 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Attention: Jeffery Koerselman, Esq. Email: jkoerselman@winthrop.com With a copy to: U.S. Bancorp Community Development Corporation Attention: Director of LIHTC Asset Management 1307 Washington Avenue, Suite 300 Mail Code: SL MO RMCD St. Louis, MO 63103 With a copy to: Kutak Rock LLP Attention: Jill Goldstein 1650 Farnam Street Omaha, NE 68102 6 (2) in the case of Lender, is addressed or delivered personally to Lender at: City of Edina, Minnesota 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Attention: Stephanie Hawkinson, Affordable Housing Development Manager or at such other address with respect to any such party as that party may, from time to time, designate in writing and forward to the other, as provided in this Section. Section 5.3 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. Section 5.4 Modification. If Borrower is requested by the holder of a mortgage or by a prospective holder of a prospective mortgage to amend or supplement this Agreement in any manner whatsoever, Lender will, in good faith, consider the request with a view to granting the same unless Lender, in its reasonable judgment, concludes that such modification is not in the public interest, or will significantly and undesirably weaken the financial security provided to the interests of Lender by the terms and provisions of this Agreement. Section 5.5 Law Governing. This Agreement will be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. Section 5.6 Lender Approvals. Any approval, execution of documents, or other action to be taken by Lender pursuant to this Agreement, for the purpose of carrying out the terms of this Agreement or for the purpose of determining sufficient performance by Borrower under this Agreement, may be made, executed or taken by Lender without further approval by Lender of the County. Section 5.7 Termination. This Agreement shall terminate on the earlier of December 31, 2053 or the date the Loan is repaid in full. Section 5.8 Tax Credit Requirements. Notwithstanding any provision in the Mortgage or other documents evidencing the Loan, Lender acknowledges that the Loan and the Mortgage are subordinate to the requirements of Section 42(h)(6)(E) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) pertaining to limitations on eviction of tenants and increases in rent for the three-year period following foreclosure. Section 5.9 Representations and Warranties. Lender represents and warrants that this Loan is not funded or subsidized, in whole or part, from the proceeds of tax exempt bonds or any other federal source of funds, and instead has been funded solely from state, local or private resources. [The remainder of this page has been left blank intentionally.] IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written. LENDER: CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By: __________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor By: __________________________ Scott H. Neal, City Manager BORROWER: AMUNDSON FLATS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Minnesota limited partnership By: Edina Group LLC Its: General Partner By: __________________________ Christopher J. Stokka Its: Chief Manager EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Property Lot 1, Block 1, and Outlot A, Amundson Flats, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. EXHIBIT B Grant Agreement (See attached) 19345469v2 MORTGAGE THIS MORTGAGE (the “Mortgage”) is made effective as of __________, 2020, by AMUNDSON FLATS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Minnesota limited partnership (“Mortgagor”), in favor of the CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a Minnesota statutory city, and its successors or assigns (“Mortgagee”). W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, Mortgagee has agreed to make a loan in the amount of $247,340.00 (the “Loan”) pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in that certain Loan Agreement dated even herewith by and between Mortgagor and Mortgagee (the “Loan Agreement”) and that certain Promissory Note of even date herewith executed by Mortgagor and made payable in the original principal amount of $247,340.00 (the “Note”); and WHEREAS, Mortgagor will secure the Note by this Mortgage. NOW THEREFORE, THIS MORTGAGE FURTHER WITNESSETH, that in consideration of the aggregate sum of $247,340.00 (the “Mortgage Amount”) made available to Mortgagor and other good and lawful consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and to secure, and as security for, the payment of the principal of and interest, if any, and other premiums, penalties and charges on the Note and the performance and observance by Mortgagor of all of the covenants, agreements, representations, warranties and conditions contained herein, Mortgagor hereby mortgages, grants, bargains and conveys, and grants a security interest to Mortgagee forever, in and to the tract(s) of land legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof (hereinafter referred to as the “Land”); Together with (a) all of the buildings, structures and other improvements now standing or at any time hereafter constructed or placed upon the Land; (b) all hereditaments, easements, rights, privileges and appurtenances now or hereafter belonging, attached or in any way pertaining to the Land or to any building, structure or improvement now or hereafter located thereon; (c) the immediate and continuing right to receive and collect all rents, income, issues and profits now due and which may hereafter become due under or by virtue of any lease or agreement (oral or written) for the leasing, subleasing, use or occupancy of all or part of the Land now, heretofore or hereafter made or agreed to by Mortgagor; and (d) all insurance and other proceeds of, and all condemnation awards with respect to, the foregoing (all of the foregoing is hereinafter collectively referred to as 2 the “Mortgaged Property”) subject to the rights of all holders of mortgages with priority over the Mortgage. The filing of this Mortgage shall constitute a fixture filing in the office where it is filed and a carbon, photographic or other reproduction of this document may also be filed as a financing statement: Name and Address of AMUNDSON FLATS, Debtor and Record LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Owner of Real Estate 7645 Lyndale Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55423 Description of the Types See above (or items) of property covered by this financing statement: Description of real estate to See Exhibit A attached hereto. which all or a part of the collateral is attached or upon which it is located: Some of the above described collateral is or is to become fixtures upon or minerals and mineral rights located upon the real estate described on Exhibit A, and this financing statement is to be filed for record in the public real estate records. AND MORTGAGOR, for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant, that it is lawfully seized of the Mortgaged Property and has good right to sell and convey the same; that the Mortgaged Property is free from all encumbrances except as may be further stated in this Mortgage; and that Mortgagor will WARRANT AND DEFEND the title to the same against all lawful claims not specifically excepted in this Mortgage. PROVIDED, NEVERTHELESS, that if Mortgagor shall pay the principal sum equal to the Mortgage Amount plus interest, if any, at the rate set forth in the Note, as the same changes from time to time and is adjusted in the manner set forth in the Note, on the unpaid principal balance, as computed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Note, and any other sums due and owing under the Note and shall also pay or cause to be paid all other sums, with interest thereon, as may be advanced by the Mortgagee in accordance with this Mortgage either to protect the lien of this Mortgage, or for any other purpose, and shall also keep and perform all and singular the covenants herein required on the part of Mortgagor to be kept and performed (the Note and all such sums, together with interest thereon, and such covenants herein collectively referred to as the “Indebtedness Secured Hereby”), then this Mortgage shall be null and void, in which event the Mortgagee will execute and deliver in form suitable for recording at Mortgagor’s expense a full satisfaction of this Mortgage; otherwise this Mortgage shall remain in full force and effect. 3 ARTICLE I. GENERAL COVENANTS, AGREEMENTS, WARRANTIES SECTION 1.1. OBSERVANCE OF COVENANTS. Mortgagor shall duly and punctually perform and observe all of the covenants, agreements and provisions contained herein. Mortgagor shall pay the outstanding principal balance of the Indebtedness Secured Hereby plus accrued interest thereon, if any, and any other amounts due under the Note in accordance with the terms of the Note. SECTION 1.2. MAINTENANCE; REPAIRS. Mortgagor shall keep and maintain the Mortgaged Property in good condition, subject to ordinary wear and tear, free from any waste or misuse, and will comply with all requirements of law, municipal ordinances and regulations, restrictions and covenants affecting the Mortgaged Property and its use. SECTION 1.3. PAYMENT OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS. Mortgagor shall, before any penalty attaches thereto, pay or cause to be paid all taxes, assessments and levies of every nature heretofore or hereafter assessed against the Mortgaged Property and upon demand will furnish receipted bills evidencing such payment. Nothing in this Section 1.3 shall require the payment or discharge of any obligations imposed upon Mortgagor by this Section so long as Mortgagor shall diligently and in good faith and at their own expense contest the same or the validity thereof by appropriate legal proceeding which shall operate to prevent the collection thereof or other realization thereon and the sale or forfeiture of the Mortgaged Property or any part thereof to satisfy the same; provided, however, that during such contest Mortgagor shall provide security assuring the discharge of Mortgagor’s obligation under this Section and of any additional charge, penalty or expense arising from or incurred as a result of such contest; and provided further, however, that if at any time payment of any obligation imposed upon Mortgagor by this Section shall become necessary to prevent the delivery of a tax deed conveying the Land or any portion thereof because of nonpayment, then Mortgagor shall pay the same in sufficient time to prevent the delivery of such tax deed. SECTION 1.4. LIENS. Except for liens and encumbrances, if any, listed on Exhibit B attached hereto or consented to by or granted to the Mortgagee (“Permitted Encumbrances”), Mortgagor will keep the Mortgaged Property free from all liens (other than the liens hereof and liens for taxes, assessments not yet due and payable) and encumbrances of every nature whatsoever, including without limitation secondary or subsequent mortgage liens, heretofore or hereafter arising, Mortgagor will pay and procure the release of any such lien or encumbrances. Nothing in this Section 1.4 shall require the payment or discharge of any obligations imposed upon Mortgagor by this Section so long as Mortgagor shall diligently and in good faith and at its own expense contest the same or the validity thereof by appropriate legal proceeding which shall operate to prevent the collection thereof or other realization thereon and the sale or forfeiture of the Mortgaged Property or any part thereof to satisfy the same; provided, however, that during such contest Mortgagor shall, at the reasonable request of Mortgagee, provide security satisfactory to the Mortgagee, assuring the discharge of Mortgagor’s obligation under this Section and of any additional charge, penalty or expense arising from or incurred as a result of such contest; and 4 provided further, however, that if at any time payment of any obligation imposed upon Mortgagor by this Section shall become necessary to prevent the delivery of a tax deed conveying the Land or any portion thereof because of nonpayment, or any other forfeiture or involuntary transfer of Mortgagor’s interest in any of the Mortgaged Property, then Mortgagor shall pay the same in sufficient time to prevent the delivery of such tax deed, forfeiture or involuntary transfer. SECTION 1.5. COMPLIANCE WITH LAW. Mortgagor will promptly comply with all present and future laws, ordinances, rules and regulations of any governmental authority affecting the Mortgaged Property unless the same is being diligently contested by Mortgagor in good faith and by proper proceedings. SECTION 1.6. RIGHT OF MORTGAGEE TO ENTER. Mortgagor will permit Mortgagee and its agents to enter, and to authorize others to enter, upon any or all of the Land, at any time and from time to time after reasonable prior notice (except in the case of an emergency, as determined by the Mortgagee in its reasonable discretion, in which case no notice shall be required), during normal business hours, to inspect the Mortgaged Property, to perform or observe any covenants, conditions or terms hereunder which Mortgagor shall fail to perform, meet or comply with, or for any other purpose in connection with the protection or preservation of Mortgagee’s security, without thereby becoming liable to Mortgagor or any person in possession under the Mortgage. SECTION 1.7. RIGHT OF THE MORTGAGEE TO PERFORM. If Mortgagor fails to pay all and singular any taxes, assessments, levies or other similar charges or encumbrances heretofore or hereafter assessed against the Mortgaged Property or fails to obtain the release of any lien or encumbrance (other than a Permitted Encumbrance) of any nature heretofore or hereafter arising upon the Mortgaged Property or fails to perform any other covenants and agreements contained in this Mortgage or if any action or proceeding is commenced which adversely affects or questions the title to or possession of the Mortgaged Property or the interest of Mortgagor or Mortgagee therein, then the Mortgagee, at the Mortgagee’s option, without notice to Mortgagor, may perform such covenants and agreements, investigate and defend against such action or proceeding, and take such other action as the Mortgagee deems necessary to protect the Mortgagee’s interest. Any amounts disbursed by the Mortgagee pursuant to this Section 1.7, including without limitation court costs and expenses and reasonable attorneys’ fees, with interest thereon, shall become additional indebtedness of Mortgagor, shall accrue interest at 8% per annum and shall be secured by this Mortgage. SECTION 1.8. FURTHER ASSURANCES. At any time and from time to time, upon request, Mortgagor will make, execute and deliver or cause to be made, executed and delivered, any and all other further instruments, certificates and other documents as may, in the reasonable opinion of Mortgagee, be necessary or desirable in order to effectuate, complete or perfect, or to continue and preserve, the obligations of Mortgagor hereunder and under the Note and the mortgage and security interest granted by this Mortgage. SECTION 1.9. EXPENSES. Mortgagor will pay for all reasonable attorney’s fees, costs and expenses incurred by Mortgagee in any legal proceeding or dispute of any kind in which Mortgagee is made a part, or appears as party plaintiff or defendant, affecting the Indebtedness Secured Hereby, this Mortgage, the interest created herein or the Mortgaged Property, including 5 but not limited to the exercise of the power of sale set forth in this Mortgage, any condemnation action involving the Mortgaged Property or any action to protect the security. SECTION 1.10. SUBORDINATION TO FUTURE INDEBTEDNESS. Mortgagee expressly agrees that its rights under the Mortgage shall be subordinate to the refinancing of any loan which is secured by a mortgage identified as a Permitted Encumbrance on Exhibit B attached hereto and agrees to execute a separate subordination agreement at the time of any such refinancing evidencing such subordination. Mortgagee expressly agrees that the sale of the Project to an entity affiliated with the general partner (provided, however, that the affiliate of the general partner (the “New Borrower”) shall satisfy all underwriting requirements of Mortgagee and Mortgagor shall be required to cause the New Borrower to comply with all requirements of Mortgagee with respect to the assignment and transfer of the Loan and the Loan Documents and all obligations thereunder to the New Borrower) will not accelerate the Maturity Date; provided, however, that the foregoing shall not apply in the case of a refinance transaction under which the Mortgagor receives proceeds of the new financing. For purposes of clarification of the foregoing sentence, a refinancing of senior debt on the Project where the proceeds of such refinancing are used to repay and refinance the senior debt on the Project, a transfer of the limited partner’s interest in Mortgagor and the replacement and removal of the general partner of the Mortgagor in accordance with the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Mortgageor dated of even date herewith shall each be permitted hereunder and shall not accelerate the Maturity Date of the Loan or cause any Event of Default under the Loan Documents. Recording of this Mortgage will evidence Mortgagee’s acceptance of this provision. ARTICLE II. INSURANCE, CONDEMNATION AND USE OF PROCEEDS SECTION 2.1. INSURANCE. Until the Indebtedness Secured Hereby has been paid in full, Mortgagor shall keep any buildings, structures, fixtures and other improvements now existing or hereafter erected on the Land insured against loss by fire, vandalism, and malicious mischief, perils of extended coverage, and such other hazards, casualties and contingencies, in an amount not less than the greater of (a) the full replacement cost thereof and (b) the full insurable value thereof, which in no event shall be less than the amount of Indebtedness Secured Hereby, and naming the Mortgagee as loss payee. Mortgagor shall also maintain comprehensive general public liability insurance providing for limits of coverage of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, and $2,000,000 combined single limit coverage, and naming the Mortgagee as an additional insured. Mortgagor shall also cause its general contractor to maintain professional liability insurance of not less than $1,500,000 per claim and $2,000,000 aggregate and pollution liability insurance of not less than $2,000,000 and shall provide the Mortgagee with a certificate, or certificates, of insurance, and, in connection with the pollution liability insurance, name Mortgagee and Hennepin County, Minnesota as certificate holders and as additional insureds. SECTION 2.2. CONDEMNATION. Mortgagor shall give immediate written notice of the actual or threatened commencement of any proceedings under condemnation or eminent domain affecting all or any part of the Mortgaged Property or any easement therein or appurtenance thereof Subject to the Permitted Encumbrances, if all or any part of the Mortgaged Property is damaged, taken or acquired, either temporarily or permanently, in any condemnation proceeding, or by 6 exercise of the right of eminent domain, the amount of any award or other payment for such taking, acquisition or damages made in consideration thereof, to the extent of the full amount of the remaining unpaid indebtedness secured by this instrument, is hereby assigned to Mortgagee, who is empowered to collect and receive the same and to give proper receipts therefore in the name of Mortgagor and the same shall be paid forthwith to Mortgagee, to be applied to the Indebtedness Secured Hereby. Mortgagee’s rights under this Section 2.2 shall be limited by the rights of senior lenders to Mortgagor. Any condemnation proceeds remaining of payment of all outstanding loans to Mortgagor shall be returned to Mortgagor. SECTION 2.3. RESTORATION. Notwithstanding Section 2.1 or 2.2 of this Mortgage, Mortgagee shall not exercise Mortgagee’s option to apply insurance or condemnation proceeds to the payment of the Indebtedness Secured Hereby but shall make such proceeds available for the restoration and repair of the Mortgaged Property if all of the following conditions are met: (a) Mortgagor is not in breach or default of any provision of this Mortgage or the Note, or Mortgagor’s breach or default has been cured with the applicable cure period, and (b) Mortgagee reasonably determines that there will be sufficient funds, through insurance or condemnation proceeds and contributions by Mortgagor, to restore and repair the Mortgaged Property to a condition as close as reasonably possible to what previously existed, due consideration given to any portion of the Mortgaged Property taken through eminent domain or condemnation. ARTICLE III. EVENT OF DEFAULT; REMEDIES SECTION 3.1. EVENT OF DEFAULT. “Event of Default” under this Mortgage shall have the meaning assigned to such term in the Loan Agreement. SECTION 3.2. REMEDIES. Subject to the rights of any senior lenders to Mortgagor and except as to the notice and cure provisions set forth in Section 4.1 of the Loan Agreement, upon the occurrence of an Event of Default or at any time thereafter, Mortgagee may, at its option, exercise any and all of the following rights and remedies (and any other rights and remedies available to it under applicable law or any document related hereto): (a) Mortgagee may declare immediately due and payable all indebtedness secured by this Mortgage and the same shall thereupon by immediately due and payable; (b) Mortgagee shall be entitled as a matter of right to the immediate appointment of a receiver for the Mortgaged Property by a court of competent jurisdiction, without regard to (i) the then current fair market value of the Mortgaged Property, (ii) whether any waste has occurred on or about the Mortgaged Property, (iii) the solvency or financial condition of Mortgagor or any other party, or (iv) any other event, occurrence, condition or factor which may limit or restrict Mortgagee’s absolute right to the appointment of such a receiver; (c) Mortgagee may foreclose this Mortgage by action or (to the extent permitted by Minnesota law) advertisement upon written notice thereof to Mortgagor, and Mortgagor hereby authorizes the Mortgagee to do so, power being herein expressly granted to sell the 7 Mortgaged Property at public auction without any prior hearing thereof and to convey the same to the purchaser, in fee simple, pursuant to the statutes of Minnesota in such case made and provided and, out of the proceeds arising from such sale, to pay all Indebtedness Secured Hereby with interest, and all legal costs and charges of such foreclosure and the reasonable attorney’s fees; and (d) Mortgagee may exercise any of the remedies made available to a secured party under the Uniform Commercial Code in effect in the State of Minnesota, or other applicable law, with respect to any of the Mortgaged Property which constitutes personal property, including without limitation the right to take possession thereof, proceeding without judicial process or by judicial process (without a prior hearing or notice thereof, which Mortgagor hereby waives), and the right to sell, lease or otherwise dispose of or use any or all of such personal property. Mortgagee may require Mortgagor to assemble such personal property and make it available to Mortgagee at a place designated by Mortgagee which is reasonably convenient to both Mortgagor and Mortgagee. If notice to Mortgagor of any intended disposition of any of the Mortgaged Property constituting personal property or any other intended action is required by law in a particular instance, such notice shall be deemed commercially reasonable if given at least thirty (30) calendar days prior to the date of intended disposition or other action. In the event of a sale under this Mortgage, whether by virtue of judicial proceedings or otherwise, the Mortgaged Property may, at the option of Mortgagee, be sold as one parcel and as an entirety or in such parcels, manner and order as Mortgagee in its sole discretion may elect. Any proceeds following a foreclosure remaining of payment of all outstanding loans to Mortgagor shall be returned to Mortgagor. U.S. Bancorp Community Development Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, its successors and/or assigns, the investor limited partner of Mortgagor (the “Investor Limited Partner”), shall have the right, but not the obligation, to cure any Event of Default by Mortgagor under this Mortgage or any default under the Note, and Mortgagee shall accept performance by Investor Limited Partner of any obligation of Mortgagor thereunder as though tendered by Mortgagor itself, provided such performance by Investor Limited Partner has occurred during the applicable cure period, if any. The Mortgagor agrees that the Investor Limited Partner will have ten (10) days after the Investor Limited Partner’s receipt of notice of such default to cure, or cause the cure of a monetary default under the Mortgage, and thirty (30) days (or such longer period as is set forth in the Mortgage) after the Investor Limited Partner’s receipt of such notice to cure any non- monetary defaults under the Mortgage, or, as to non-monetary defaults, such longer period as is reasonably necessary for the Investor Limited Partner to cause cure, provided that cure is commenced within the above cure period and diligently prosecuted, including, without limitation, such time period as is necessary to remove Mortgagee’s general partner, if necessary in order to effect a cure. SECTION 3.3. PURCHASE OF MORTGAGED PROPERTY. In case of any sale of the Mortgaged Property pursuant to any judgment or decree of any court or otherwise in connection with the enforcement of any of the terms of this Mortgage, Mortgagee, its successors and assigns, may become the purchaser, and for the purpose of making settlement for or payment of the purchase price, shall be entitled to turn in and use the Note and any claims for interest, late charges 8 and prepayment premiums matured and unpaid thereon, together with any other Indebtedness Secured Hereby, if any, in order that there may be credited as paid on the purchase price the sum, or any part thereof, then due, under the Note, including principal thereof and interest, late charges and prepayment premiums, if any, thereon, and any other Indebtedness Secured Hereby. ARTICLE IV. MISCELLANEOUS SECTION 4.1. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. The covenants and agreements herein contained shall bind, and the rights hereunder shall inure to, the respective successors and assigns of Mortgagor and Mortgagee, including among Mortgagor’s assigns any purchasers or transferees of the Mortgaged Property. SECTION 4.2. NON-RECOURSE. Neither the Mortgagor, nor any partner, officer, director, employee or agent of Mortgagor, shall have any personal liability for the Mortgagor’s obligations hereunder, it being recognized by Mortgagee that the obligations of the Mortgagor hereunder are non-recourse obligations and that the remedies of Mortgagee are limited to the security provided in connection with this Mortgage. SECTION 4.3. TAX CREDIT REQUIREMENTS. Notwithstanding any provision in the Mortgage or other documents evidencing the Loan, the Mortgagee acknowledges that the Loan and the Mortgage is subordinate to the requirements of Section 42(h)(6)(E) of the Internal Revenue Code pertaining to limitations on eviction of tenants and increases in rent for the three-year period following foreclosure. SECTION 4.4. HEADINGS. The headings of the sections contained herein are for convenience only and are not to be construed to be a part of or limit or affect the terms hereof. SECTION 4.5. TRANSFER: REMOVAL; AMENDMENT. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Mortgage or the Note, it shall not constitute an Event of Default under this Mortgage or a default under the Note and the consent of Mortgagee is not required, for: (a) the transfer of limited partner interests in Mortgagor owned by the Investor Limited Partner to an affiliate of Investor Limited Partner in accordance with the terms of Mortgagor’s Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership dated even herewith, as the same may be amended from time to time (the “Partnership Agreement”), (b) the transfer of the ownership interests in Investor Limited Partner, so long as the managing member or general partner of Investor Limited Partner is an affiliate of Investor Limited Partner, (c) the removal of the general partner of Mortgagor for cause in accordance with the Partnership Agreement by Investor Limited Partner and the replacement of the general partner with an affiliate of Investor Limited Partner, or (d) an amendment of the Partnership Agreement (i) resulting from transfers as described above or (ii) which does not materially and adversely affect the ability of Mortgagor to perform Mortgagor’s obligations under this Mortgage and the Note. Mortgagee further agrees that if its consent is required hereunder as a condition to (y) the transfer of the limited partner interests in Mortgagor owned by Investor Limited Partner to a party that is not an affiliate of Investor Limited Partner, or (z) the replacement of the general partner of Mortgagor with a party that is not an affiliate of 9 Investor Limited Partner, such consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed. SECTION 4.6. NOTICE. Any notices to be delivered hereunder shall be delivered to the address of the appropriate party as set forth in the Loan Agreement. THIS MORTGAGE IS EXEMPT FROM MORTGAGE REGISTRATION TAX IMPOSED BY MINNESOTA STATUTES, §287.035, PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, § 287.04, BECAUSE THE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF THE ORIGINAL MORTGAGE LOAN REFERRED TO HEREIN IS MADE UNDER A LOW AND MODERATE INCOME OR OTHER AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAM AND THE MORTGAGEE IS THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA. [The remainder of this page has been left blank intentionally.] 10 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Mortgagor has caused this Mortgage to be duly executed and delivered to the Mortgagee as of the day and year first above written. MORTGAGOR: AMUNDSON FLATS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Minnesota limited partnership By: Edina Group LLC Its: General Partner By: ______________________________ Christopher J. Stokka Its: Chief Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of ___________, 2020, by Christopher J. Stokka, the Chief Manager of Edina Group LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, the general partner of Amundson Flats, Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership, on behalf of the limited partnership. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A. (SWA) 225 South Sixth Street, Suite 3500 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612-604-6400 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Property Lot 1, Block 1, and Outlot A, Amundson Flats, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. EXHIBIT B Permitted Encumbrances 1. Real estate taxes and installments of special assessments not yet due and payable. 2. [To be completed] 19346054v5 LOAN AGREEMENT THIS LOAN AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is made effective as of __________, 2020, by and between AMUNDSON FLATS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Minnesota limited partnership (“Borrower”), and CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a Minnesota statutory city (“Lender”). RECITALS: A. In cooperation with Borrower, the Lender made application (the “Application”) to and received funds in the amount of $400,500.00 from the Metropolitan Council ("Council") under its Tax Base Revitalization Account – Contamination Cleanup Grant Program (the “TBRA Grant”) pursuant to the terms of that certain Metropolitan Livable Communities Act Grant Agreement by and between the Lender and the Council dated as of _________, 2020 (the “Grant Agreement”), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein. Any capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meaning given to such terms in the Grant Agreement. B. Lender desires to loan proceeds of the TBRA Grant in the amount of Four Hundred Thousand Five Hundred and no/100 Dollars ($400,500.00) (the "Loan") to Borrower pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, to assist Borrower with the development of a 62-unit rental housing project to be constructed in Edina, Minnesota (the “Project”) that has received low- income housing tax credits under Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual obligations of the parties hereto, each of them does hereby covenant and agree with the other as follows: ARTICLE I. UNDERTAKINGS OF LENDER Subject to satisfaction of the conditions set forth in Article III, Lender agrees to loan Borrower the amount of $400,500, the proceeds of which shall be used to pay eligible Project Costs, as defined in the Grant Agreement. ARTICLE II. UNDERTAKINGS OF BORROWER Section 2.1 Terms of the Loan. Borrower acknowledges that Lender is loaning the proceeds of the Loan to Borrower. The entire principal balance, plus interest, if any, shall be payable in accordance with that certain Promissory Note dated even herewith by Borrower for the benefit of Lender (the “Note”), and shall be secured by that certain Mortgage dated even herewith by Borrower for the benefit of Lender and recorded as a subordinate mortgage against the real property underlying the Project described on Exhibit A hereto (the “Property”). 2 Section 2.2 Conditions to Funding the Loan. As a condition precedent to disbursing the proceeds of the Loan, Borrower shall deliver to Lender the executed originals of this Agreement, the Note, and the Mortgage. Section 2.3 Disbursement of the Loan Proceeds. The proceeds of the Loan shall be disbursed to Borrower on a reimbursement basis to pay for incurred Project Costs, pursuant to the terms of the Grant Agreement. ARTICLE III. BORROWER COVENANTS Section 3.1 Status of Borrower; Transfer of Substantially All Assets. Borrower represents and agrees that Borrower will maintain its existence as a limited partnership and will not wind up or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of its assets during the term of the Note. Section 3.2 Release and Indemnification Covenants. (1) Borrower releases Lender from, covenants and agrees that the indemnified parties shall not be liable for, and agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Lender against, any loss or damage to property or any injury to or death of any person occurring at or about or resulting from any defect in the Project or resulting from or occurring on the Property. (2) Borrower agrees to protect and defend Lender, now or forever, and further agrees to hold Lender harmless, from any claim, demand, suit, action or other proceeding whatsoever by any person or entity whatsoever arising or purportedly arising (i) from any violation of this Agreement, the Note or the Mortgage (collectively, the “Loan Documents”) (except with respect to any suit, action, demand or other proceeding brought by Borrower against Lender to enforce its rights under the Loan Documents), (ii) the acquisition, construction, installation, ownership, and operation of the Project, or (iii) any hazardous substances located in or on the Property. (3) Lender shall not be liable for any damage or injury to the persons or property of Borrower due to any act of negligence of any person, other than any act of negligence on the part of Lender or its officers, agents, representatives, or employees. (4) All covenants, stipulations, promises, agreements and obligations of Lender contained herein shall be deemed to be the covenants, stipulations, promises, agreements and obligations of Lender and not of any governing body member, officer, agent, servant or employee of Lender in the individual capacity thereof. (5) The provisions of this Section 3.2 shall survive the termination of this Agreement. Section 3.3 Real Property Taxes. Borrower shall pay all real property taxes with respect to all parts of the Property which are payable pursuant to the provisions of any statutory or contractual duty that shall accrue until title to the Property is vested in another person; provided, 3 however, that Borrower may contest the imposition of any real property taxes or assessments in good faith. Section 3.4 Grant Agreement. Borrower shall comply with all applicable requirements contained in the Grant Agreement and submit any reporting information related to the Project that is requested by the Lender or Council. ARTICLE IV. EVENTS OF DEFAULT Section 4.1 Events of Default Defined. The following shall be “Events of Default” under this Agreement and the term “Event of Default” shall mean, whenever it is used in this Agreement, any one or more of the following events: (1) Failure by Borrower to substantially observe or perform any covenant, condition, obligation or agreement on its part to be observed or performed under this Agreement, and such failure is not cured within sixty (60) days after Lender notifies Borrower in writing of such failure; provided, however, that if Borrower has commenced the cure of such default within sixty (60) days, then such sixty (60) day period shall be extended so long as Borrower is diligently pursuing the cure; or (2) Borrower shall: (a) file any petition in bankruptcy or for any reorganization, arrangement, composition, readjustment, liquidation, dissolution, or similar relief under the United States Bankruptcy Act of 1978, as amended, or under any similar federal or state law; or (b) make an assignment for the benefit of its creditors; or (c) admit in writing its inability to pay its debts generally as they become due; or (d) be adjudicated a bankrupt or insolvent; or if a petition or answer proposing the adjudication of Borrower as a bankrupt or its reorganization under any present or future federal bankruptcy act or any similar federal or state law shall be filed in any court and such petition or answer shall not be discharged or denied within ninety (90) days after the filing thereof; or a receiver, trustee or liquidator of Borrower or of the Project, or part thereof, shall be appointed in any proceeding brought against Borrower, and shall not be discharged within ninety (90) days after such appointment, or if Borrower shall consent to or acquiesce in such appointment; or (e) fail to comply with any material terms of the Grant Agreement. U.S. Bancorp Community Development Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, its successors and/or assigns, the investor limited partner of Borrower (the “Investor Limited Partner”) shall have 4 the right, but not the obligation, to cure any default or Event of Default by Borrower under this Agreement or any default under any other Loan Document, and Lender shall accept performance by Investor Limited Partner of any obligation of Borrower thereunder as though tendered by Borrower itself. The Lender agrees that the Investor Limited Partner will have ten (10) days after the Investor Limited Partner’s receipt of notice of such default to cure, or cause the cure of a monetary default under the Loan Documents, and thirty (30) days (or such longer period as is set forth in the Loan Documents) after the Investor Limited Partner’s receipt of such notice to cure any non-monetary defaults under the Loan Documents, or, as to non-monetary defaults, such longer period as is reasonably necessary for the Investor Limited Partner to cause cure, provided that cure is commenced within the above cure period and diligently prosecuted, including, without limitation, such time period as is necessary to remove Borrower’s general partner, if necessary in order to effect a cure. Upon the occurrence of any event that would become an Event of Default hereunder if not cured within any applicable cure period set forth herein, Borrower agrees to promptly provide written notice to Lender describing such event and Borrower’s plan for curing the same. Section 4.2 Remedies on Default. Whenever any Event of Default referred to in Section 4.1 of this Agreement occurs and is continuing, Lender, as specified below, may take any one or more of the following actions: (1) Lender may declare the unpaid principal of the Loan immediately due and payable; (2) Lender may exercise its rights and remedies under the Mortgage and proceed against the collateral described therein; (3) Lender may suspend its performance under this Agreement until it receives assurances from Borrower, deemed adequate by Lender, that Borrower will cure its default and continue its performance under this Agreement; or (4) Lender may take any action, including legal or administrative action, which may appear necessary or desirable to collect any payments due under this Agreement, or to enforce performance and observance of any obligation, agreement, or covenant of Borrower under this Agreement. Section 4.3 No Remedy Exclusive. No remedy herein conferred upon or reserved to Lender is intended to be exclusive of any other available remedy or remedies, but each and every such remedy shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy given under this Agreement or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity or by statute. No delay or omission to exercise any right or power accruing upon any default shall impair any such right or power or shall be construed to be a waiver thereof, but any such right and power may be exercised from time to time and as often as may be deemed expedient. Section 4.4 No Implied Waiver. In the event any agreement contained in this Agreement should be breached by any party and thereafter waived by any other party, such waiver shall be limited to the particular breach so waived and shall not be deemed to waive any other concurrent, previous or subsequent breach hereunder. 5 Section 4.5 Agreement to Pay Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses. Whenever any Event of Default occurs and Lender shall employ attorneys or incur other expenses for the collection of payments due or to become due or for the enforcement or performance or observance of any obligation or agreement on the part of Borrower herein contained, Borrower agrees that it shall, on demand therefor, pay to Lender the reasonable fees of such attorneys and such other expenses so incurred by Lender. ARTICLE V. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS Section 5.1 Titles of Articles and Sections. Any titles of the several parts, articles and sections of this Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall be disregarded in construing or interpreting any of its provisions. Section 5.2 Notices and Demands. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, a notice, demand or other communication under this Agreement by any party to any other shall be sufficiently given or delivered if it is dispatched by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, or delivered personally or via electronic mail, and (1) in the case of Borrower, is addressed to or delivered personally to Borrower at: If to Borrower: Amundson Flats, Limited Partnership 7645 Lyndale Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55423 Attention: Christopher J. Stokka Email: ChrisStokka@mwfproperties.com With a copy to: Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A. 225 S. Sixth Street, Ste. 3500 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Attention: Jeffery Koerselman, Esq. Email: jkoerselman@winthrop.com With a copy to: U.S. Bancorp Community Development Corporation Attention: Director of LIHTC Asset Management 1307 Washington Avenue, Suite 300 Mail Code: SL MO RMCD St. Louis, MO 63103 With a copy to: Kutak Rock LLP Attention: Jill Goldstein 1650 Farnam Street Omaha, NE 68102 6 (2) in the case of Lender, is addressed or delivered personally to Lender at: City of Edina, Minnesota 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Attention: Stephanie Hawkinson, Affordable Housing Development Manager or at such other address with respect to any such party as that party may, from time to time, designate in writing and forward to the other, as provided in this Section. Section 5.3 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. Section 5.4 Modification. If Borrower is requested by the holder of a mortgage or by a prospective holder of a prospective mortgage to amend or supplement this Agreement in any manner whatsoever, Lender will, in good faith, consider the request with a view to granting the same unless Lender, in its reasonable judgment, concludes that such modification is not in the public interest, or will significantly and undesirably weaken the financial security provided to the interests of Lender by the terms and provisions of this Agreement. Section 5.5 Law Governing. This Agreement will be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. Section 5.6 Lender Approvals. Any approval, execution of documents, or other action to be taken by Lender pursuant to this Agreement, for the purpose of carrying out the terms of this Agreement or for the purpose of determining sufficient performance by Borrower under this Agreement, may be made, executed or taken by Lender without further approval by Lender or the Council. Section 5.7 Termination. This Agreement shall terminate on the earlier of December 31, 2053 or the date the Loan is repaid in full. Section 5.8 Tax Credit Requirements. Notwithstanding any provision in the Mortgage or other documents evidencing the Loan, Lender acknowledges that the Loan and the Mortgage are subordinate to the requirements of Section 42(h)(6)(E) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) pertaining to limitations on eviction of tenants and increases in rent for the three-year period following foreclosure. Section 5.9 Representations and Warranties. Lender represents and warrants that this Loan is not funded or subsidized, in whole or part, from the proceeds of tax exempt bonds or any other federal source of funds, and instead has been funded solely from state, local or private resources. [The remainder of this page has been left blank intentionally.] IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written. LENDER: CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By: __________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor By: __________________________ Scott H. Neal, City Manager BORROWER: AMUNDSON FLATS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Minnesota limited partnership By: Edina Group LLC Its: General Partner By: __________________________ Christopher J. Stokka Its: Chief Manager EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Property Lot 1, Block 1, and Outlot A, Amundson Flats, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. EXHIBIT B Grant Agreement (See attached) 19343950v1 MORTGAGE THIS MORTGAGE (the “Mortgage”) is made effective as of __________, 2020, by AMUNDSON FLATS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Minnesota limited partnership (“Mortgagor”), in favor of the CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a Minnesota statutory city, and its successors or assigns (“Mortgagee”). W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, Mortgagee has agreed to make a loan in the amount of $400,500 (the “Loan”) pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in that certain Loan Agreement dated even herewith by and between Mortgagor and Mortgagee (the “Loan Agreement”) and that certain Promissory Note of even date herewith executed by Mortgagor and made payable in the original principal amount of $400,500 (the “Note”); and WHEREAS, Mortgagor will secure the Note by this Mortgage. NOW THEREFORE, THIS MORTGAGE FURTHER WITNESSETH, that in consideration of the aggregate sum of $400,500 (the “Mortgage Amount”) made available to Mortgagor and other good and lawful consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and to secure, and as security for, the payment of the principal of and interest, if any, and other premiums, penalties and charges on the Note and the performance and observance by Mortgagor of all of the covenants, agreements, representations, warranties and conditions contained herein, Mortgagor hereby mortgages, grants, bargains and conveys, and grants a security interest to Mortgagee forever, in and to the tract(s) of land legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof (hereinafter referred to as the “Land”); Together with (a) all of the buildings, structures and other improvements now standing or at any time hereafter constructed or placed upon the Land; (b) all hereditaments, easements, rights, privileges and appurtenances now or hereafter belonging, attached or in any way pertaining to the Land or to any building, structure or improvement now or hereafter located thereon; (c) the immediate and continuing right to receive and collect all rents, income, issues and profits now due and which may hereafter become due under or by virtue of any lease or agreement (oral or written) for the leasing, subleasing, use or occupancy of all or part of the Land now, heretofore or hereafter made or agreed to by Mortgagor; and (d) all insurance and other proceeds of, and all condemnation awards with respect to, the foregoing (all of the foregoing is hereinafter collectively referred to as 2 the “Mortgaged Property”) subject to the rights of all holders of mortgages with priority over the Mortgage. The filing of this Mortgage shall constitute a fixture filing in the office where it is filed and a carbon, photographic or other reproduction of this document may also be filed as a financing statement: Name and Address of AMUNDSON FLATS, Debtor and Record LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Owner of Real Estate 7645 Lyndale Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55423 Description of the Types See above (or items) of property covered by this financing statement: Description of real estate to See Exhibit A attached hereto. which all or a part of the collateral is attached or upon which it is located: Some of the above described collateral is or is to become fixtures upon or minerals and mineral rights located upon the real estate described on Exhibit A, and this financing statement is to be filed for record in the public real estate records. AND MORTGAGOR, for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant, that it is lawfully seized of the Mortgaged Property and has good right to sell and convey the same; that the Mortgaged Property is free from all encumbrances except as may be further stated in this Mortgage; and that Mortgagor will WARRANT AND DEFEND the title to the same against all lawful claims not specifically excepted in this Mortgage. PROVIDED, NEVERTHELESS, that if Mortgagor shall pay the principal sum equal to the Mortgage Amount plus interest, if any, at the rate set forth in the Note, as the same changes from time to time and is adjusted in the manner set forth in the Note, on the unpaid principal balance, as computed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Note, and any other sums due and owing under the Note and shall also pay or cause to be paid all other sums, with interest thereon, as may be advanced by the Mortgagee in accordance with this Mortgage either to protect the lien of this Mortgage, or for any other purpose, and shall also keep and perform all and singular the covenants herein required on the part of Mortgagor to be kept and performed (the Note and all such sums, together with interest thereon, and such covenants herein collectively referred to as the “Indebtedness Secured Hereby”), then this Mortgage shall be null and void, in which event the Mortgagee will execute and deliver in form suitable for recording at Mortgagor’s expense a full satisfaction of this Mortgage; otherwise this Mortgage shall remain in full force and effect. 3 ARTICLE I. GENERAL COVENANTS, AGREEMENTS, WARRANTIES SECTION 1.1. OBSERVANCE OF COVENANTS. Mortgagor shall duly and punctually perform and observe all of the covenants, agreements and provisions contained herein. Mortgagor shall pay the outstanding principal balance of the Indebtedness Secured Hereby plus accrued interest thereon, if any, and any other amounts due under the Note in accordance with the terms of the Note. SECTION 1.2. MAINTENANCE; REPAIRS. Mortgagor shall keep and maintain the Mortgaged Property in good condition, subject to ordinary wear and tear, free from any waste or misuse, and will comply with all requirements of law, municipal ordinances and regulations, restrictions and covenants affecting the Mortgaged Property and its use. SECTION 1.3. PAYMENT OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS. Mortgagor shall, before any penalty attaches thereto, pay or cause to be paid all taxes, assessments and levies of every nature heretofore or hereafter assessed against the Mortgaged Property and upon demand will furnish receipted bills evidencing such payment. Nothing in this Section 1.3 shall require the payment or discharge of any obligations imposed upon Mortgagor by this Section so long as Mortgagor shall diligently and in good faith and at their own expense contest the same or the validity thereof by appropriate legal proceeding which shall operate to prevent the collection thereof or other realization thereon and the sale or forfeiture of the Mortgaged Property or any part thereof to satisfy the same; provided, however, that during such contest Mortgagor shall provide security assuring the discharge of Mortgagor’s obligation under this Section and of any additional charge, penalty or expense arising from or incurred as a result of such contest; and provided further, however, that if at any time payment of any obligation imposed upon Mortgagor by this Section shall become necessary to prevent the delivery of a tax deed conveying the Land or any portion thereof because of nonpayment, then Mortgagor shall pay the same in sufficient time to prevent the delivery of such tax deed. SECTION 1.4. LIENS. Except for liens and encumbrances, if any, listed on Exhibit B attached hereto or consented to by or granted to the Mortgagee (“Permitted Encumbrances”), Mortgagor will keep the Mortgaged Property free from all liens (other than the liens hereof and liens for taxes, assessments not yet due and payable) and encumbrances of every nature whatsoever, including without limitation secondary or subsequent mortgage liens, heretofore or hereafter arising, Mortgagor will pay and procure the release of any such lien or encumbrances. Nothing in this Section 1.4 shall require the payment or discharge of any obligations imposed upon Mortgagor by this Section so long as Mortgagor shall diligently and in good faith and at its own expense contest the same or the validity thereof by appropriate legal proceeding which shall operate to prevent the collection thereof or other realization thereon and the sale or forfeiture of the Mortgaged Property or any part thereof to satisfy the same; provided, however, that during such contest Mortgagor shall, at the reasonable request of Mortgagee, provide security satisfactory to the Mortgagee, assuring the discharge of Mortgagor’s obligation under this Section and of any additional charge, penalty or expense arising from or incurred as a result of such contest; and 4 provided further, however, that if at any time payment of any obligation imposed upon Mortgagor by this Section shall become necessary to prevent the delivery of a tax deed conveying the Land or any portion thereof because of nonpayment, or any other forfeiture or involuntary transfer of Mortgagor’s interest in any of the Mortgaged Property, then Mortgagor shall pay the same in sufficient time to prevent the delivery of such tax deed, forfeiture or involuntary transfer. SECTION 1.5. COMPLIANCE WITH LAW. Mortgagor will promptly comply with all present and future laws, ordinances, rules and regulations of any governmental authority affecting the Mortgaged Property unless the same is being diligently contested by Mortgagor in good faith and by proper proceedings. SECTION 1.6. RIGHT OF MORTGAGEE TO ENTER. Mortgagor will permit Mortgagee and its agents to enter, and to authorize others to enter, upon any or all of the Land, at any time and from time to time after reasonable prior notice (except in the case of an emergency, as determined by the Mortgagee in its reasonable discretion, in which case no notice shall be required), during normal business hours, to inspect the Mortgaged Property, to perform or observe any covenants, conditions or terms hereunder which Mortgagor shall fail to perform, meet or comply with, or for any other purpose in connection with the protection or preservation of Mortgagee’s security, without thereby becoming liable to Mortgagor or any person in possession under the Mortgage. SECTION 1.7. RIGHT OF THE MORTGAGEE TO PERFORM. If Mortgagor fails to pay all and singular any taxes, assessments, levies or other similar charges or encumbrances heretofore or hereafter assessed against the Mortgaged Property or fails to obtain the release of any lien or encumbrance (other than a Permitted Encumbrance) of any nature heretofore or hereafter arising upon the Mortgaged Property or fails to perform any other covenants and agreements contained in this Mortgage or if any action or proceeding is commenced which adversely affects or questions the title to or possession of the Mortgaged Property or the interest of Mortgagor or Mortgagee therein, then the Mortgagee, at the Mortgagee’s option, without notice to Mortgagor, may perform such covenants and agreements, investigate and defend against such action or proceeding, and take such other action as the Mortgagee deems necessary to protect the Mortgagee’s interest. Any amounts disbursed by the Mortgagee pursuant to this Section 1.7, including without limitation court costs and expenses and reasonable attorneys’ fees, with interest thereon, shall become additional indebtedness of Mortgagor, shall accrue interest at 8% per annum and shall be secured by this Mortgage. SECTION 1.8. FURTHER ASSURANCES. At any time and from time to time, upon request, Mortgagor will make, execute and deliver or cause to be made, executed and delivered, any and all other further instruments, certificates and other documents as may, in the reasonable opinion of Mortgagee, be necessary or desirable in order to effectuate, complete or perfect, or to continue and preserve, the obligations of Mortgagor hereunder and under the Note and the mortgage and security interest granted by this Mortgage. SECTION 1.9. EXPENSES. Mortgagor will pay for all reasonable attorney’s fees, costs and expenses incurred by Mortgagee in any legal proceeding or dispute of any kind in which Mortgagee is made a part, or appears as party plaintiff or defendant, affecting the Indebtedness Secured Hereby, this Mortgage, the interest created herein or the Mortgaged Property, including 5 but not limited to the exercise of the power of sale set forth in this Mortgage, any condemnation action involving the Mortgaged Property or any action to protect the security. SECTION 1.10. SUBORDINATION TO FUTURE INDEBTEDNESS. Mortgagee expressly agrees that its rights under the Mortgage shall be subordinate to the refinancing of any loan which is secured by a mortgage identified as a Permitted Encumbrance on Exhibit B attached hereto and agrees to execute a separate subordination agreement at the time of any such refinancing evidencing such subordination. Mortgagee expressly agrees that the sale of the Project to an entity affiliated with the general partner (provided, however, that the affiliate of the general partner (the “New Borrower”) shall satisfy all underwriting requirements of Mortgagee and Mortgagor shall be required to cause the New Borrower to comply with all requirements of Mortgagee with respect to the assignment and transfer of the Loan and the Loan Documents and all obligations thereunder to the New Borrower) will not accelerate the Maturity Date; provided, however, that the foregoing shall not apply in the case of a refinance transaction under which the Mortgagor receives proceeds of the new financing. For purposes of clarification of the foregoing sentence, a refinancing of senior debt on the Project where the proceeds of such refinancing are used to repay and refinance the senior debt on the Project, a transfer of the limited partner’s interest in Mortgagor and the replacement and removal of the general partner of the Mortgagor in accordance with the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Mortgageor dated of even date herewith shall each be permitted hereunder and shall not accelerate the Maturity Date of the Loan or cause any Event of Default under the Loan Documents. Recording of this Mortgage will evidence Mortgagee’s acceptance of this provision. ARTICLE II. INSURANCE, CONDEMNATION AND USE OF PROCEEDS SECTION 2.1. INSURANCE. Until the Indebtedness Secured Hereby has been paid in full, Mortgagor shall keep any buildings, structures, fixtures and other improvements now existing or hereafter erected on the Land insured against loss by fire, vandalism, and malicious mischief, perils of extended coverage, and such other hazards, casualties and contingencies, in an amount not less than the greater of (a) the full replacement cost thereof and (b) the full insurable value thereof, which in no event shall be less than the amount of Indebtedness Secured Hereby, and naming the Mortgagee as loss payee. Mortgagor shall also maintain comprehensive general public liability insurance providing for limits of coverage of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, and $2,000,000 combined single limit coverage, and naming the Mortgagee as an additional insured. Mortgagor shall also cause its general contractor to maintain professional liability insurance of not less than $1,500,000 per claim and $2,000,000 aggregate and pollution liability insurance of not less than $2,000,000 and shall provide the Mortgagee with a certificate, or certificates, of insurance, and, in connection with the pollution liability insurance, name Mortgagee and Hennepin County, Minnesota as certificate holders and as additional insureds. SECTION 2.2. CONDEMNATION. Mortgagor shall give immediate written notice of the actual or threatened commencement of any proceedings under condemnation or eminent domain affecting all or any part of the Mortgaged Property or any easement therein or appurtenance thereof Subject to the Permitted Encumbrances, if all or any part of the Mortgaged Property is damaged, taken or acquired, either temporarily or permanently, in any condemnation proceeding, or by 6 exercise of the right of eminent domain, the amount of any award or other payment for such taking, acquisition or damages made in consideration thereof, to the extent of the full amount of the remaining unpaid indebtedness secured by this instrument, is hereby assigned to Mortgagee, who is empowered to collect and receive the same and to give proper receipts therefore in the name of Mortgagor and the same shall be paid forthwith to Mortgagee, to be applied to the Indebtedness Secured Hereby. Mortgagee’s rights under this Section 2.2 shall be limited by the rights of senior lenders to Mortgagor. Any condemnation proceeds remaining of payment of all outstanding loans to Mortgagor shall be returned to Mortgagor. SECTION 2.3. RESTORATION. Notwithstanding Section 2.1 or 2.2 of this Mortgage, Mortgagee shall not exercise Mortgagee’s option to apply insurance or condemnation proceeds to the payment of the Indebtedness Secured Hereby but shall make such proceeds available for the restoration and repair of the Mortgaged Property if all of the following conditions are met: (a) Mortgagor is not in breach or default of any provision of this Mortgage or the Note, or Mortgagor’s breach or default has been cured with the applicable cure period, and (b) Mortgagee reasonably determines that there will be sufficient funds, through insurance or condemnation proceeds and contributions by Mortgagor, to restore and repair the Mortgaged Property to a condition as close as reasonably possible to what previously existed, due consideration given to any portion of the Mortgaged Property taken through eminent domain or condemnation. ARTICLE III. EVENT OF DEFAULT; REMEDIES SECTION 3.1. EVENT OF DEFAULT. “Event of Default” under this Mortgage shall have the meaning assigned to such term in the Loan Agreement. SECTION 3.2. REMEDIES. Subject to the rights of any senior lenders to Mortgagor and except as to the notice and cure provisions set forth in Section 4.1 of the Loan Agreement, upon the occurrence of an Event of Default or at any time thereafter, Mortgagee may, at its option, exercise any and all of the following rights and remedies (and any other rights and remedies available to it under applicable law or any document related hereto): (a) Mortgagee may declare immediately due and payable all indebtedness secured by this Mortgage and the same shall thereupon by immediately due and payable; (b) Mortgagee shall be entitled as a matter of right to the immediate appointment of a receiver for the Mortgaged Property by a court of competent jurisdiction, without regard to (i) the then current fair market value of the Mortgaged Property, (ii) whether any waste has occurred on or about the Mortgaged Property, (iii) the solvency or financial condition of Mortgagor or any other party, or (iv) any other event, occurrence, condition or factor which may limit or restrict Mortgagee’s absolute right to the appointment of such a receiver; (c) Mortgagee may foreclose this Mortgage by action or (to the extent permitted by Minnesota law) advertisement upon written notice thereof to Mortgagor, and Mortgagor hereby authorizes the Mortgagee to do so, power being herein expressly granted to sell the 7 Mortgaged Property at public auction without any prior hearing thereof and to convey the same to the purchaser, in fee simple, pursuant to the statutes of Minnesota in such case made and provided and, out of the proceeds arising from such sale, to pay all Indebtedness Secured Hereby with interest, and all legal costs and charges of such foreclosure and the reasonable attorney’s fees; and (d) Mortgagee may exercise any of the remedies made available to a secured party under the Uniform Commercial Code in effect in the State of Minnesota, or other applicable law, with respect to any of the Mortgaged Property which constitutes personal property, including without limitation the right to take possession thereof, proceeding without judicial process or by judicial process (without a prior hearing or notice thereof, which Mortgagor hereby waives), and the right to sell, lease or otherwise dispose of or use any or all of such personal property. Mortgagee may require Mortgagor to assemble such personal property and make it available to Mortgagee at a place designated by Mortgagee which is reasonably convenient to both Mortgagor and Mortgagee. If notice to Mortgagor of any intended disposition of any of the Mortgaged Property constituting personal property or any other intended action is required by law in a particular instance, such notice shall be deemed commercially reasonable if given at least thirty (30) calendar days prior to the date of intended disposition or other action. In the event of a sale under this Mortgage, whether by virtue of judicial proceedings or otherwise, the Mortgaged Property may, at the option of Mortgagee, be sold as one parcel and as an entirety or in such parcels, manner and order as Mortgagee in its sole discretion may elect. Any proceeds following a foreclosure remaining of payment of all outstanding loans to Mortgagor shall be returned to Mortgagor. U.S. Bancorp Community Development Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, its successors and/or assigns, the investor limited partner of Mortgagor (the “Investor Limited Partner”), shall have the right, but not the obligation, to cure any Event of Default by Mortgagor under this Mortgage or any default under the Note, and Mortgagee shall accept performance by Investor Limited Partner of any obligation of Mortgagor thereunder as though tendered by Mortgagor itself, provided such performance by Investor Limited Partner has occurred during the applicable cure period, if any. The Mortgagor agrees that the Investor Limited Partner will have ten (10) days after the Investor Limited Partner’s receipt of notice of such default to cure, or cause the cure of a monetary default under the Mortgage, and thirty (30) days (or such longer period as is set forth in the Mortgage) after the Investor Limited Partner’s receipt of such notice to cure any non- monetary defaults under the Mortgage, or, as to non-monetary defaults, such longer period as is reasonably necessary for the Investor Limited Partner to cause cure, provided that cure is commenced within the above cure period and diligently prosecuted, including, without limitation, such time period as is necessary to remove Mortgagee’s general partner, if necessary in order to effect a cure. SECTION 3.3. PURCHASE OF MORTGAGED PROPERTY. In case of any sale of the Mortgaged Property pursuant to any judgment or decree of any court or otherwise in connection with the enforcement of any of the terms of this Mortgage, Mortgagee, its successors and assigns, may become the purchaser, and for the purpose of making settlement for or payment of the purchase price, shall be entitled to turn in and use the Note and any claims for interest, late charges 8 and prepayment premiums matured and unpaid thereon, together with any other Indebtedness Secured Hereby, if any, in order that there may be credited as paid on the purchase price the sum, or any part thereof, then due, under the Note, including principal thereof and interest, late charges and prepayment premiums, if any, thereon, and any other Indebtedness Secured Hereby. ARTICLE IV. MISCELLANEOUS SECTION 4.1. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. The covenants and agreements herein contained shall bind, and the rights hereunder shall inure to, the respective successors and assigns of Mortgagor and Mortgagee, including among Mortgagor’s assigns any purchasers or transferees of the Mortgaged Property. SECTION 4.2. NON-RECOURSE. Neither the Mortgagor, nor any partner, officer, director, employee or agent of Mortgagor, shall have any personal liability for the Mortgagor’s obligations hereunder, it being recognized by Mortgagee that the obligations of the Mortgagor hereunder are non-recourse obligations and that the remedies of Mortgagee are limited to the security provided in connection with this Mortgage. SECTION 4.3. TAX CREDIT REQUIREMENTS. Notwithstanding any provision in the Mortgage or other documents evidencing the Loan, the Mortgagee acknowledges that the Loan and the Mortgage is subordinate to the requirements of Section 42(h)(6)(E) of the Internal Revenue Code pertaining to limitations on eviction of tenants and increases in rent for the three-year period following foreclosure. SECTION 4.4. HEADINGS. The headings of the sections contained herein are for convenience only and are not to be construed to be a part of or limit or affect the terms hereof. SECTION 4.5. TRANSFER: REMOVAL; AMENDMENT. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Mortgage or the Note, it shall not constitute an Event of Default under this Mortgage or a default under the Note and the consent of Mortgagee is not required, for: (a) the transfer of limited partner interests in Mortgagor owned by the Investor Limited Partner to an affiliate of Investor Limited Partner in accordance with the terms of Mortgagor’s Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership dated even herewith, as the same may be amended from time to time (the “Partnership Agreement”), (b) the transfer of the ownership interests in Investor Limited Partner, so long as the managing member or general partner of Investor Limited Partner is an affiliate of Investor Limited Partner, (c) the removal of the general partner of Mortgagor for cause in accordance with the Partnership Agreement by Investor Limited Partner and the replacement of the general partner with an affiliate of Investor Limited Partner, or (d) an amendment of the Partnership Agreement (i) resulting from transfers as described above or (ii) which does not materially and adversely affect the ability of Mortgagor to perform Mortgagor’s obligations under this Mortgage and the Note. Mortgagee further agrees that if its consent is required hereunder as a condition to (y) the transfer of the limited partner interests in Mortgagor owned by Investor Limited Partner to a party that is not an affiliate of Investor Limited Partner, or (z) the replacement of the general partner of Mortgagor with a party that is not an affiliate of 9 Investor Limited Partner, such consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed. SECTION 4.6. NOTICE. Any notices to be delivered hereunder shall be delivered to the address of the appropriate party as set forth in the Loan Agreement. THIS MORTGAGE IS EXEMPT FROM MORTGAGE REGISTRATION TAX IMPOSED BY MINNESOTA STATUTES, §287.035, PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, § 287.04, BECAUSE THE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF THE ORIGINAL MORTGAGE LOAN REFERRED TO HEREIN IS MADE UNDER A LOW AND MODERATE INCOME OR OTHER AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAM AND THE MORTGAGEE IS THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA. [The remainder of this page has been left blank intentionally.] 10 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Mortgagor has caused this Mortgage to be duly executed and delivered to the Mortgagee as of the day and year first above written. MORTGAGOR: AMUNDSON FLATS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Minnesota limited partnership By: Edina Group LLC Its: General Partner By: ______________________________ Christopher J. Stokka Its: Chief Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of ___________, 2020, by Christopher J. Stokka, the Chief Manager of Edina Group LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, the general partner of Amundson Flats, Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership, on behalf of the limited partnership. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A. (SWA) 225 South Sixth Street, Suite 3500 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612-604-6400 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Property Lot 1, Block 1, and Outlot A, Amundson Flats, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. EXHIBIT B Permitted Encumbrances 1. Real estate taxes and installments of special assessments not yet due and payable. 2. [To be completed] 19343956v4 PROMISSORY NOTE $247,340.00 __________, 2020 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, AMUNDSON FLATS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Minnesota limited partnership (“Borrower”), hereby promises to pay to the order of the CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a Minnesota statutory city (“Lender”), at such place as Lender from time to time may designate in writing, the principal sum of Two Hundred Forty-Seven Thousand Three Hundred Forty and no/100 Dollars ($247,340.00) without interest. Except as otherwise required under the terms of this Note, no payments of principal shall be due prior to the Maturity Date (as defined herein). The principal balance shall be due and payable in full on December 31, 2053 (the “Maturity Date”), provided, however, if there is a sale of the Project (as defined in that certain Loan Agreement dated even herewith between Borrower and Lender (the “Loan Agreement”)) to an entity not controlled or affiliated with the general partner of Borrower (or, with respect to a sale of the Project to an entity controlled or affiliated with the general partner of Borrower, if the requirements for such sale and transfer of the Project to the New Borrower (as that term is defined in the Mortgage) set forth in the Mortgage are not satisfied), or a refinancing of the senior debt on the Project under which Borrower receives proceeds of the new financing, this Note shall be due in payable in full upon the date of such sale or refinancing. For purposes of clarification of the foregoing sentence, a refinancing of senior debt on the Project where the proceeds of such refinancing are used to repay and refinance only the senior debt on the Project shall be permitted hereunder and shall not accelerate the Maturity Date. For the avoidance of doubt, the transfer of the limited partner’s interest in Borrower, or the removal and replacement of the general partner of the Borrower in accordance with the terms of the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Borrower dated of even date herewith shall not result in acceleration of Note under the provisions of this paragraph. This Note is secured by a Mortgage of even date herewith (the “Mortgage”) and such Mortgage describes the rights of Lender as to the acceleration of the indebtedness evidenced by this Note. Borrower shall have the right of prepayment either in full or in partial payments, which right shall be without penalty. Subject to the terms and conditions of Section 4.1 of the Loan Agreement and Section 3.2 of the Mortgage dated even herewith between Mortgagor and Mortgagee (the “Mortgage”), upon default of any amount becoming due hereafter, then the full amount of the balance of principal of this Note shall at once become due and payable at the option of Lender without demand or notice, said demand or notice being expressly waived, and failure to exercise said option at any time shall not constitute a waiver of the right to exercise the same at any subsequent time. Neither Borrower nor any of its partners shall have any personal liability for the payment of any sums due under this Note or the performance of any obligations of Borrower hereunder. In any action to realize upon any security furnished under any instrument now or hereafter securing the indebtedness evidenced by this Note or to collect any amounts payable hereunder, neither Borrower nor any partner of Borrower or any partner, officer, director, shareholder, 2 employee or agent of any partner of Borrower shall have any personal liability for the repayment of this Note and no judgment for the repayment of this Note or interest thereon or any other sums due under this Note or for damages for failure to perform any obligations owed to Borrower hereunder will be enforced against Borrower personally or against any property of Borrower other than the security furnished under the Mortgage or any other instrument securing this Note. This Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. Any notices required to be given under this Note shall be deemed given when deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the recipient or to the record successor thereof at the addresses designated in the Loan Agreement dated herewith between Borrower and Lender. The provisions of this Note shall be binding upon Borrower and its successors or assigns. [The remainder of this page has been left blank intentionally.] 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Promissory Note has been duly executed by Borrower as of the day and year above first written. AMUNDSON FLATS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Minnesota limited partnership By: Edina Group LLC Its: General Partner By: _______________________________________ Christopher J. Stokka Its: Chief Manager 19346007v2 PROMISSORY NOTE $400,500.00 __________, 2020 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, AMUNDSON FLATS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Minnesota limited partnership (“Borrower”), hereby promises to pay to the order of the CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a Minnesota statutory city (“Lender”), at such place as Lender from time to time may designate in writing, the principal sum of Four Hundred Thousand Five Hundred and no/100 Dollars ($400,500.00) without interest. Except as otherwise required under the terms of this Note, no payments of principal shall be due prior to the Maturity Date (as defined herein). The principal balance shall be due and payable in full on December 31, 2053 (the “Maturity Date”), provided, however, if there is a sale of the Project (as defined in that certain Loan Agreement dated even herewith between Borrower and Lender (the “Loan Agreement”)) to an entity not controlled or affiliated with the general partner of Borrower (or, with respect to a sale of the Project to an entity controlled or affiliated with the general partner of Borrower, if the requirements for such sale and transfer of the Project to the New Borrower (as that term is defined in the Mortgage) set forth in the Mortgage are not satisfied), or a refinancing of the senior debt on the Project under which Borrower receives proceeds of the new financing, this Note shall be due in payable in full upon the date of such sale or refinancing. For purposes of clarification of the foregoing sentence, a refinancing of senior debt on the Project where the proceeds of such refinancing are used to repay and refinance only the senior debt on the Project shall be permitted hereunder and shall not accelerate the Maturity Date. For the avoidance of doubt, the transfer of the limited partner’s interest in Borrower, or the removal and replacement of the general partner of the Borrower in accordance with the terms of the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Borrower dated of even date herewith shall not result in acceleration of Note under the provisions of this paragraph. This Note is secured by a Mortgage of even date herewith (the “Mortgage”) and such Mortgage describes the rights of Lender as to the acceleration of the indebtedness evidenced by this Note. Borrower shall have the right of prepayment either in full or in partial payments, which right shall be without penalty. Subject to the terms and conditions of Section 4.1 of the Loan Agreement and Section 3.2 of the Mortgage dated even herewith between Mortgagor and Mortgagee (the “Mortgage”), upon default of any amount becoming due hereafter, then the full amount of the balance of principal of this Note shall at once become due and payable at the option of Lender without demand or notice, said demand or notice being expressly waived, and failure to exercise said option at any time shall not constitute a waiver of the right to exercise the same at any subsequent time. Neither Borrower nor any of its partners shall have any personal liability for the payment of any sums due under this Note or the performance of any obligations of Borrower hereunder. In any action to realize upon any security furnished under any instrument now or hereafter securing the indebtedness evidenced by this Note or to collect any amounts payable hereunder, neither Borrower nor any partner of Borrower or any partner, officer, director, shareholder, 2 employee or agent of any partner of Borrower shall have any personal liability for the repayment of this Note and no judgment for the repayment of this Note or interest thereon or any other sums due under this Note or for damages for failure to perform any obligations owed to Borrower hereunder will be enforced against Borrower personally or against any property of Borrower other than the security furnished under the Mortgage or any other instrument securing this Note. This Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. Any notices required to be given under this Note shall be deemed given when deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the recipient or to the record successor thereof at the addresses designated in the Loan Agreement dated herewith between Borrower and Lender. The provisions of this Note shall be binding upon Borrower and its successors or assigns. [The remainder of this page has been left blank intentionally.] 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Promissory Note has been duly executed by Borrower as of the day and year above first written. AMUNDSON FLATS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Minnesota limited partnership By: Edina Group LLC Its: General Partner By: _______________________________________ Christopher J. Stokka Its: Chief Manager 19343959v1 Date: June 16, 2020 Agenda Item #: VI.I. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2020-67: Final Plat for 7413 and 7424 York Terrace for Blaz Razul Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2020-67 approving the Final Plat. INTRODUCTION: The Council approved the Preliminary Plat on June 2, 2020. The lot lines have been revised as recommended at Preliminary Plat approval. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2020-67 Preliminary Plat Final Plat RESOLUTION NO. 2020-67 APPROVING FINAL PLAT WITH VARIANCES AT 7413 and 7425 YORK TERRACE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Blaz Rasul is proposing to subdivide his properties at 7413 and 7425 York Terrace into three lots. The existing homes on both lots would remain, and a new home would be constructed on the new Lot 2, created in between the two existing homes. 1.02 Within this neighborhood, the median lot area is 9,962 square feet, median lot depth is 133 feet, and the median lot width is 75 feet. 1.03 The following described tract of land is requested to be divided: Lots 9 and 10, Block 1, York Hills, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 1.04 To accommodate the request the following is required: 1. A subdivision; 2. Lot width variances from 75 feet to 59 feet for Lot 1; 3. Lot depth variances from 135 feet to 132 feet for Lot 1 and to 107 for lots 2 and 3; and 4. Lot area variances from 9,962 s.f. to 8,909 s.f. for Lot 1, to 8,328 s.f. for Lot 2 and 8,859 s.f. for Lot 3. 1.05 The Subject Property is guided Single Family Residential under the City’s Comprehensive Plan and is zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District. 1.06 On April 29, 2020 after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon. The Planning Commission recommended approval. Vote: 6 Ayes and 1 Nay. 1.07 On May 16, 2020, the City Council held a public hearing on the proposed subdivision and variances. 1.08 On June 2, 2020, the City Council unanimously approved the Preliminary Plat and variances. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. Except for the variances, the proposal meets the required standards and ordinance for a subdivision. Resolution No. 2020-67 Page 2 2. The practical difficulty is caused by the location of the original home at 7430 Xerxes that was platted around in 1951 in order to preserve it. Additionally, the location of the existing home at 7425 York Terrace, causes the width of Lot 1 to be reduced below 75 feet in width in order to preserve it. The subject property and the lot to the east are oversized for this block. If these structures were both removed, four lots could be created in equal size to every other lot on the block. 3. The median width in this neighborhood is 75 feet wide, which is the average of the subject three lots. The widths, area and depths proposed vary compared to the neighborhood in order to preserve the existing home at 7425 York Terrace. 4. The request is reasonable, in that it would allow the same number of lots on York Terrace, if every lot on street were 75 feet wide. 5. The requested variances to split this lot are reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood. 6. The median width in this neighborhood is 75 feet wide, which is more consistent with the proposed lots and not the existing 150-foot wide lot. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Final Plat for the proposed three lot subdivision of 7413 & 7425 York Terrace with a lot width variance from 75 feet to 59 for Lot 1; lot depth variances from 135 feet to 132 for Lot 1 and to 107 for lots 2 and 3; and lot area variances from 9,962 square feet to 8,909 s.f. for Lot 1, to 8,328 s.f. for Lot 2 and 8,859 s.f. for Lot 3. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. The existing dirt driveways on Lots 1 and 3 shall be re-surfaced and maintained with an all- weather, durable and dust-free surfacing material per Section 36-1322 of the City Code. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following items must be submitted: a. Submit evidence of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District approval. The City may require revisions to the preliminary plat to meet the district’s requirements. b. A curb-cut permit must be obtained from the Edina engineering department. c. A grading, drainage and erosion control plan subject to review and approval of the city engineer. The proposed plans shall meet all conditions outlined in the engineering memo dated April 14, 2020. d. There shall be no increase in peak rate or volume to neighboring private property. Resolution No. 2020-67 Page 3 e. Any disturbance to the roadway caused by the construction of the new homes must be repaired by replacing the asphalt pavement from curb-to-curb and from saw-cut to saw-cut. f. A construction management plan will be required for the construction of the new homes. g. Utility hook-ups are subject to review of the city engineer. h. Park dedication fee of $5,000 is due prior to issuance of a building permit. Adopted this 16th day of June 2020. ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 16, 2020 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2020. _________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk W 1/4 CORNER, SEC. 32, TWP. 28, RNG. 24, HENNEPIN COUNTY CAST IRON MONUMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF (1)INA 107.50 107.64 (P) THOMAS KESSLER 8 PID: 3202824310021 _a ,r Y - — 24.82 N 89°56'02" ) \c <-‘ e W Y ee 1.) O O rN S 00'1 1 '36" W B DRIVEWAY r WIRE ELASTIC BUILDING SETBACKS ZONING: R1 = SINGLE-FAMILY DISTRICT HOUSE: FRONT = 30 FT SIDE = 10 FT (LOTS 75 FT OR GREATER) REAR=25 FT HARDCOVER OF LOT 1, BL.1 EXISTING HOUSE EXISTING GARAGE EXISTING DECK CREDIT TOTAL LOT AREA EXISTING HARDCOVER 992 SQ. FT. 457 SQ. FT. 375 SQ. FT. (150 SQ. FT.) 16,198 SQ. FT. 10.3% JOB NAME: BLAZ RASUL LOCATION: 7425 YORK TERRACE EDINA, MN 55435 FIELD WORK DATE: 02/01/20 FIELD BOOK NO.: EDS-13 PROJECT NO.: 20-007 DRAWN BY: IS CHECKED BY: VS SHEET C2 A I BLAZ RA $6',: t PID. 3202824310/22 I k. I I /EXISTING HOUSE 0 1-1 EXISTING GARAGE P., FFE = 874.83- #7413 EXISTING HOUSE #742.5 / FFE = 878.59 /s DECK 'I LL=870.16 1\ _ \t //44 Y/ 126 \co ,i6.ovtes 38 \— rk !RETAINING WALL ___ 1 /25/7179.6 0 —I )1 ARACE X15.86(f) CHRIS K. KIM & MIHWA KIM PID: 3202824310001 Co i s, 7 ' — FOUND "*F720M COMPUPED COR. 25 E . • ELIZABETH CHASE PIO: 3202824310017 #7430 EXISTING HOUSE 875- 11 ASPEKT, LLC PID: 3202824310023 \ DitCK ) 1 , 0 4 Sq.': ,\ 9',5-4---a'021---LE 870. BW / —>< ,<< —873 0-TW - —1-872.0 TW / V N x 8 6 7: G .0 BW/ 145'' \ rk-F -.132. 54 / .i. \ \ 9•So, 61 5A-11 c I o\ 1 S T RE CHAIN /LINK /I / I 0,75 Ne• FENCE —7`— -3-HE'V . r P)." _1 / PROPOSED ' HOUSE PAD FFE=880.6 TOB=879.1 a=870.1 GAR=878.6 W i 1 16.60 I 2 I ,cv ",‘ , I \ —h/2141(7c 1/ \ I RAIN q:D I 549453" W -SI W 25 r.ARn 0 <I. I " 2.5 •\ u)7.31' Yi/o N a956-U2 F " A, 2331.07 N. LINE OF THE NE 1/4 OF 7HE SW 1/4, SEC. 32, lo TWP. 28, RNG. 24 .•-• CC! fr) O N I 1 / / / co/ co / 3 1.0 O O 1`6 \ 1 N WEV'30/-1A / N F 30 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET LEGEND • DENOTES FOUND PROPERTY IRON . 4j 0 DENOTES SET 1/2" X 18" REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP "PLS 25105" -4- 0 DENOTES CAST IRON MONUMENT TL DENOTES BOUNDARY LINE DENOTES LOT LINE DENOTES SETBACK LINE X999.99 DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION - 999 -DENOTES EXISTING CONTOUR LINE FFE DENOTES FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION 0— DENOTES CHAINLINK FENCE 0— DENOTES WOOD FENCE (M) DENOTES MEASURED DISTANCE (P) DENOTES PLATTED DISTANCE LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 9, YORK HILLS, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof. AREAS Lot 1, Block 1 = 8,909± Sq.Ft. (0.20 Acres) Lot 2, Block 1 = 8,328± Sq.Ft. (0.19 Acres) Lot 3, Block 1 = 8,859± Sq.Ft. (0.20 Acres) RAMZEY ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT SUNDAL PROPERTIES, LLC PID: 3202824310024 JANET ELIZABETH PEARSON S 89'56'02" E 11 132.68 PID: 3202824310016 V •• Call 48 Hours before digging GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin Cities Area 651-454-0002 MN. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 30 I.- -0 #7429 EXISTING HOUSE S 8955'28" E / 35.09 DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE DENOTES DRAINAGE FLOW DENOTES ELECTRIC POWER POLE DENOTES DECIDUOUS TREE DENOTES CONIFEROUS TREE DENOTES SHRUB DENOTES TREE LINE DENOTES ELECTRIC METER DENOTES AIR CONDITIONER DENOTES SIGN/POST DENOTES GAS METER DENOTES LIGHT POLE DENOTES FIRE HYDRANT REFERENCE BENCHMARK PROPOSED HARDCOVER OF LOT 2. BL. 1 ELEVATION = 833.84 (NAVD 88) MNDOT DISK PROPOSED HOUSE 1,784 SQ. FT. "STERN". PROPOSED DRIVEWAY 666 SQ. FT. TOTAL LOT AREA 8,328 SQ. FT. PROPOSED HARDCOVER 29.4 % NOTES 1. THE BASIS OF THE BEARING SYSTEM IS ASSUMED. 2. NO SPECIFIC SOIL INVESTIGATION HAS BEEN COMPLETED 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY PROPOSED ELEVATIONS. 4. NO TITLE INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED FOR THIS SURVEY. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD. 5. EXISTING UTILITIES AND SERVICES SHOWN HEREON OWNER LOCATED EITHER PHYSICALLY ON THE GROUND DURING THE SURVEY OR FROM EXISTING RECORDS MADE AVAILABLE TO US OR BY RESIDENT TESTIMONY. OTHER UTILITIES AND SERVICES MAY BE PRESENT. VERIFICATION AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES AND SERVICES SHOULD BE OBTAIN FROM THE OWNERS OF RESPECTIVE UTILITIES BY CONTACTING GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT (651) 454-0002 PRIOR TO ANY DESIGN, PLANNING OR EXCAVATION. NO._ DATE DESCRIPTION BY I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Veal" 51.1.' Yiv DATED: 03/02/20 VLADIMIR SIVRIVER L.S. NO. 25105 ENGINEERING DESIGN & SURVEYING 6480 Wayzata Blvd. Minneapolis, MN 55426 OFFICE: (763) 545-2800 FAX: (763) 545-2801 EMAIL: info@edsmn.com WEBSITE: http://edsmn.com Date: June 16, 2020 Agenda Item #: VI.J. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Kelly Curtin, Human Resources Director Item Activity: Subject:Approve 2020-2021 City Insurance Renewals Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve renewal of City's insurance coverage and payment for 2020-2021 policy. INTRODUCTION: Staff has worked with our insurance broker and League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) to analyze cost and options. Staff recommends renewal of the City's 2020-2021 insurance policies through LMCIT with the following options: 1) Workers' Compensation renewal with $50,000 deductible premium option (same coverage and deductible as last year); 2) Property/Liability Insurance with the $75,000 deductible option (same coverage and deductible as last year). See attached Staff Report and Renewal P remium Summary for 2020-2021. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report: 2020-2021 City Insurance Renewal Renewal Premium Summary for 2020-2021 June 11, 2020 Mayor and City Council Kelly Curtin, Human Resources Director 2020-2021 City Insurance Renewals Information / Background: Edina is a member of the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT). LMCIT is a cooperative joint-powers organization and member premiums contribute to a jointly owned fund. The money in the fund is then used to pay members’ claims, losses, and expenses. Because LMCIT's purpose is to meet cities’ coverage and risk management needs, and not to make a profit, income not needed for operations or reserves is returned to member cities in the form of a dividend. Edina became a member of LMCIT in 2014, and received dividends of $9,311 in 2015, $22,097 in 2016, $8,181 in 2017, and $5,245 in 2018 $5,763 in 2019. 2020 Workers’ Compensation Renewal The 2020-2021 estimated total premium for worker’s compensation is $643,293 compared to last year’s premium of, an increase of $33,513. The increase is due to a significant increase in PTSD cases, which account for almost 20% of the League’s claims payments this year. However, the increase was mitigated somewhat due to the reduction in the City’s experience modification rating from 0.76 to 0.73. Deductible: For each claim submitted, the City pays the full medical costs of the claim up to the per occurrence deductible. Deductible Limits Current Deductible Limits: $50,000 medical costs per occurrence. Recommended Deductible Limits: No Change; $50,000 per occurrence. Since the change in statute which allowed for PTSD to be a compensable claim in 2013, there has been a surge in PTSD-related claims to the pool as a whole (not specifically Edina). Currently, PTSD claims account STAFF REPORT Page 2 for nearly 20% of all workers’ compensation claims dollars paid by the League. As such, all members of the League have experienced a 9% rate increase on workers’ compensation. 2020 Property/Casualty Renewal Aggregate Deductible: The maximum the City is required to pay in total claims for the policy year. Once the City has reached the aggregate deductible limit, the City would pay $1,000 per occurrence thereafter. To stay with the same coverages and deductibles, our total premiums would be $730,771, an increase over last year’s premium of $575,540. The increase is primarily attributed to the following: • The primary drivers of this year’s rate increase are increased reinsurance costs and changing claim patterns, including exceptionally high property losses, increased police, and employment liability claims. • Employment and Land Use related claims are weighted much heavier than other Claim types. • Municipal Liability - The League increased its base liability rates by 6% to all members of the League, but unfortunately The City’s experience rating deteriorated by 11% this year due to several large claims now coming on the experience mod – exasperating the impact.. • Auto - The League’s new formula looks at three years’ worth of auto claim frequency and premium data, excluding the most recent year. Only those claims that have a total net loss of greater than $1,000 are used in the calculation for experience rating. The City was adversely affected by this rating change and will look to adjust claims handling accordingly, going forward. Covered Party: Effective Date: Deductible Premium $75,000 / 150,000 / 1,000.$273,626. 75,000 / 150,000 / 1,000.19,153. 75,000 / 150,000 / 1,000.304,939. 75,000 / 150,000 / 1,000.34,705. 75,000 / 150,000 / 1,000.Included. ● Basic Economic Loss Benefits (PIP) all owned autos 75,000 / 150,000 / 1,000.Included. 75,000 / 150,000 / 1,000.43,429. 1,000.Included. NA.Included. NA.Included. 1.011 Aggregate Factor Modifier:1.781 0.905 Deductible Premium $75,000 / 150,000 / 1,000.2,454. 75,000.13,332. $NA.2,741. $NA.12,726. 75,000 / 150,000 / 1,000.1,800. $75,000 / 150,000 / 1,000.21,866. Not Covered. TOTAL:$730,771. $500,000/$1,500,000 June 5, 2020 Marsh & McLennan Agency City of Edina 7/1/2020 ● Automobile Physical Damage RENEWAL PREMIUM SUMMARY Common Coverages Coverage ● Property ● Mobile Property ● Municipal Liability ● Automobile Liability ● UM/UIM $200,000 all owned autos Coverage ● Crime ● Petrofund ● Defense Cost Reimbursement Experience Factor Modifier: Expiring Experience Factor Modifier: (Applied to Municipal Liability, Auto Liability, and UM/UIM) The modifier is calculated with a formula which compares the city’s actual loss history with the amount of losses that would be expected for a city of that size if the city were a perfectly average LMCIT member. If the city’s losses and expenses are better than average the city receives a premium credit. If the city’s losses and expenses are worse than average, the city receives a premium debit. Optional Coverages ● Bond 1,000,000. ● Equipment Breakdown ● Excess Liability Limit:1,000,000. ● Liquor Liability Limit:1,000,000. ● Fireworks ● No Fault Sewer Back Up Limit:40,000. ● Airport Liability DO NOT PAY UNTIL YOU RECEIVE INVOICES TORT LIMIT: PREMSUMXM(11/11) Approximate Premium $6,616. Sincerely, Underwriter Renewal is subject to signed and dated Waiver Election Form. Please forward at your earliest convenience. Optional Coverage Quotes Coverage Deductible Crime Limit $500,000 Optional coverage(s) are not bound unless the covered party has requested that coverage be bound and LMCIT has sent a written confirmation. Optional coverage quotes are valid for 30 days after the date of this letter. PREMSUMXM(11/11) Date: June 16, 2020 Agenda Item #: VI.K. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Kelly Curtin, Human Resources Director Item Activity: Subject:Liability Coverage Statutory Limits Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion refusing to waive municipal tort liability limits. INTRODUCTION: Cities that purchase municipal liability coverage from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) must decide each year whether they are willing to waive the monetary limits on tort liability that are offered to cities under Minnesota Statutes 466.04. If a city refuses to waive the liability limit, the maximum monetary damages a claimant can recover is generally no more than $500,000 on any claim to which the statutory tort limits apply. In addition, the total all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would be limited to $1,500,000. If a city decides to waive its liability limit, a single claimant could recover up to $2,000,000 for a single occurrence. The total all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence would also be limited to $2,000,000. If the City chose to waive the limits, it would need to pay additional premiums and would have greater exposure for future claims. Because the City of Edina purchases its municipal liability coverage from the LMCIT, the City Council must take action on this matter. Staff is not authorized under statute to make this decision. Only a City Council can decide to waive the city’s statutory tort limits. Staff recommends the Council refuse to waive the municipal tort liability limits, as we have in the past. Date: June 16, 2020 Agenda Item #: VI.L. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Brian Olson, Director of Public Works Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: 2020 Commodities H2O Treatment Chemicals Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase of 2020 Commodities - Water Treatment Chemicals. INTRODUCTION: This purchase is an annual contract for drinking water treatment chemicals. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: H2O Treatment Chemicals Commodities Quote Tabulation 2020 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Date: June 16, 2020 To: Mayor and City Council From: Brian Olson, Director of Public Works Subject: Request for Purchase: 2020 Commodities H2O Treatment Chemicals Purchase Subject to: ☒List Quote/Bid ☐State Contract ☐Service Contract The Recommended Bid is: ☒Within Budget ☐Not Within Budget 2020 pricing decreased 9.9% for tied quotes #3-5 water treatment chemicals. Water treatment chemicals were initially removed from the commodity solicitation due to staff concerns related to the COVID-19 situation. Staff is now comfortable making the switch to a new vendor. Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or expiration Date: April 3, 2020 Aug. 3, 2020 Company: Amount of Quote or Bid: Various Recommended Quote or Bid: See Quote Tabulation Page 2 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Department Director Authorization: ________________________________________ City Council Authorization Date: ______________________ (for purchases over $20,000 only) Budget Impact • Funding Source – Utility and Public Works Operating Budgets Environmental Impact • N/A Community Impact • Purchase supports residents, working population and visitors who use City infrastructure and services. QUOTE FORM CITY OF EDINA 2020 COMMODITIES NAME OF SUPPLIERS NO. PRODUCT DESCRIPTION BID ITEM DELIVERED BID ITEM PICKED UP BID ITEM 1 READY MIX BITUMINOUS MATERIALS 1a (SPNWB330B) MnDOT Non-Wear Spec No. 2360 1a n/a 1a $48.00/ton Approximately 6000 Tons 1b (SPWEA340B) MnDOT Wear Spec No. 2360 1b n/a 1b $46.75/ton Approximately 10,000 Tons 1c (SPWEB340B) MnDOT Wear Spec No. 2360 1c n/a 1c $48.50/ton Approximately 10,000 Tons 1 READY MIX BITUMINOUS MATERIALS 1a (SPNWB330B) MnDOT Non-Wear Spec No. 2360 1a n/a 1a $45.65/ton Approximately 6000 Tons 1b (SPWEA340B) MnDOT Wear Spec No. 2360 1b n/a 1b $48.95/ton Approximately 10,000 Tons 1c (SPWEB340B) MnDOT Wear Spec No. 2360 1c n/a 1c $46.65/ton Approximately 10,000 Tons 1 READY MIX BITUMINOUS MATERIALS EP - Picked Up B'ville 1a (SPNWB330B) MnDOT Non-Wear Spec No. 2360 1a $48.10/ton 1a $41.95/ton Approximately 6000 Tons 1b (SPWEA340B) MnDOT Wear Spec No. 2360 1b $49.60/ton 1b $45.40/ton Approximately 10,000 Tons 1c (SPWEB340B) MnDOT Wear Spec No. 2360 1c $43.35/ton 1c $41.90/ton Approximately 10,000 Tons 2 CONCRETE Type 3F52F - 3900 lbs Approximately 200 cu yd 2a $155.00/c.y. Approximately 400 cu yd 2b $115.00/c.y. 2 CONCRETE Approximately 200 cu yd 2a $136.00/c.y. Approximately 400 cu yd 2b $117.00/c.y. 3 HYDROFLUOSILICIC ACID Delivery to all City pump house locations. Bulk delivery to 140 gal containers Approximately 123,000 lbs 3 $18.85/cwt $23,186 Producer Approximately 123,000 lbs 3 $20.27/cwt $24,932 Producer PCS 4 LIQUID CHLORINE 150# Cylinders Approximately 130,000 lbs/year 4 $43.00/cwt $55,900 Delivery to all City pump house locations Approximately 130,000 lbs/year 4 $45.40/cwt $59,020 Delivery to all City pump house locations 5 POLYPHOSPHATE ORTHO-PHOSPHATE BLEND WATER TREATMENT CHEMICAL - 50/50 BLEND Bulk delivery to all City pump house locations Water Chemicals Totals Approximately 9,800 Gallons 5 $4.63/gal $45,374 $124,460 Producer CARUS Approximately 9,800 Gallons 5 $4.72/gal $46,256 $130,208 Producer HAWKINS 6 TONKAZORB 3% Hydrolyzed Manganese Oxide Bulk delivery to Water Treatment Plant No. 3 and Water Treatment Plant No. 4 HAWKINS Approximately 11,000 Gallons 6 $14.67/gal $161,370 7 COVERS AND CASTINGS Complete Casting & Lid Casting Only Lid Only A Sanitary Sewer - R1733 with self sealing solid cover or approved equal.8a1 $280.00/ea 8a2 $140.00/ea 8a3 $140.00/ea B Storm Sewer - Round lid R2390 or approved equal.8a1 $350.00/ea 8b2 $140.00/ea 8b3 $210.00/ea C Storm Sewer - Rectangular 3067V (no lettering) or approved equal.8c1 $410.00/ea 8c2 $172.00/ea 8c3 $126.00/ea D Cost of curb box 8d $112.00/ea 8 RETAINING WALL REPAIR Time and Labor 9 $28.85/sq. ft. 9 CONCRETE REMOVAL & REPLACEMENT 10 Curb and Guttter Flatwork 4"Flatwork 6" $9.00/sq. ft. $10.00/sq. ft. No Quote No Quote No Quote COMMERCIAL ASPHALT BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS DPC HAWKINS DPC HAWKINS HAWKINS ESS Blackstone Curbmasters $220.00/ln. ft. $65.00/sq. ft. $95.00/sq. ft. $42.00/ln. ft.All Around Concrete Ti -Zack CS MCCROSSAN AVR DPC Cemstone 1 QUOTE FORM CITY OF EDINA 2020 COMMODITIES NAME OF SUPPLIERS NO. PRODUCT DESCRIPTION BID ITEM DELIVERED BID ITEM PICKED UP BID ITEM PLEASE NOTE: No. 3,4 & 5 will be a tied bid and awarded together. Recommend accepting bid No. 8A, B & C will be a tied bid and awarded together. Award based on complete casting and cover. Approximately 300 covers and castings will be in the mix. 2 Date: June 16, 2020 Agenda Item #: VI.M. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2020-69: Appointing Election Judges for the August 11 Primary Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2020-69 appointing election judges for the Primary Election on Tuesday, August 11. INTRODUCTION: Because of COVID-19, nearly 40 elections judges that we've relied on over the years, will not work in 2020 as many are in the high-risk group. Of the 135 election judges, several are juniors and seniors at Edina High. Recruitment of election judges is ongoing, recruiting high school and college age students, along with adults not in the high-risk groups. We especially need Republican election judges for party balance to ensure fairness and because two judges of different major political parties must do certain tasks together. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2020-69: Appointing Election Judges Exhibit A Primary Election Judges RESOLUTION NO 2020-69 APPOINTING PRIMARY ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE AUGUST 11, 2020 PRIMARY WHEREAS, Minnesota Election Law 204B.21 requires that persons serving as election judges be appointed by the Council at least 25 days before the election. BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the individuals named on Exhibit A, and on file in the office of the City Clerk be appointed as the City of Edina Primary Election Judges for the August 11, 2020, Primary Election; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the Edina City Council also appoints other individuals and all members appointed to the Hennepin County Absentee Ballot Board as authorized under Minn. Stat. 204B.21, subd. 2 under the direction of the Election Manager to serve as members of the Edina Absentee Ballot Board; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Edina City Clerk is with this, authorized to make any substitutions or additions as deemed necessary. Passed and adopted by the Edina City Council this 16th day of June 2020. Attest Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of June 16, 2020 and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of ______________, 20_______. _______________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk Exhibit A State Primary Election Election Judges Joseph Agnew Mary Ahrens Amy Alvero Sayali Amarapurkar Kathleeen Amlaw Amy Anderson Ginny Anderson Valerie Anderson John Bean Scott Bettin Janice Bolin Katherine Bradbury Adele Brellenthin David Briscoe Kim Budish Paula Budish Rebecca Clark Susan Clark Jennifer Collins Jack Cracraft Marian Cracraft Judith Dale Gloria DeBerg Amy Demarest Claire Dempsey Koket Dhuguma Darcy Dickson Wendy Donovan Jan Doudiet Jim Doudiet Philip Dugan Sandra Eames-Day Cynthia Edwards Jeanene Engebretson PaulFink Carrie Fordahl Rebecca Frederick Michelle Freese Suzanne Fuluvaka Valerie Geurts Devorah Goldstein Jade Goswami Lasse Hackbarth Nancy Haley Molly Harrington Jack Hatzung Lisa Hatzung Kamille Hawkinson Cheryl Heley Eileen Hokkanen Alan Holst Susan Housh Lynn Hovde Sarah Hromada Florence Hughes Grant Johnson Seth Johnson Debbie Keeler Louise Kellams Sarina Khariwala Linda King Jessica Kingston Maggie Knack Marcia Koester Keith Kostuch Judith Krzyzek Lee Leonard John Leroy Dan Lew Cynthia Loveland Connor Lund Susan Lundgren Barbara Maeder Linda Maetzold Jill Mahoney Maria Malooly Michael Martiny Donna McCormick Mary McDonald Lindsey McKhann Marvin Menzel Gary Meyer Nancy Miller Jon Moon Peggy Mullick James Nelson Debra Neuger Carson Nida Donald Nygaard Edgar O'Brien Katherine Oberle Patti Olander Norman Owens Amy Pampusch Olson Anita Peske Heather Petermann Judie Pomerleau Linda Presthus Paul Presthus Tiffany Qian Teresa Razidlo Eric Rehm Jennifer Roach Gil Robles Judith Rodgers Catherine Rollefson Luann Rosenthal- Erickson Carol Rothe Anne Rubin Elizabeth Schloeder Aundria Schreiner Judy Schwartz Marty Sedoff Brendan Sherman Zachary Shumway Lisbeth Sjoblad Del Smith Mary Stanton Kathy Stattine Bob Strickland Andrea Tiggas Donna Tilsner Aditya Tulahalli Mary Watson Paul Wehrmeister Martha Weicht Carolyn Wenger Wayne Wenger Ardis Wexler Kelly Wheaton Jerry Wilson Katharine Winston Mary Yee Alexis Yi Janet Zahorsky Date: June 16, 2020 Agenda Item #: VI.N. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2020-70: Accepting Donations Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2020-56 accepting donations. INTRODUCTION: To comply with State Statute, all donations to the City must be accepted by resolution and approved by two- thirds majority of the Council. See attached resolution with list of donations. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2020-70: Accepting Donations RESOLUTION NO. 2020-70 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed grants and donations on behalf of its citizens. Parks & Recreation • Birdie Bagley-Westerdahl $3,200 Bench Donation at Walnut Ridge Park Fire Department • Action Fleet $ 300 Donated six tires for the department’s ATV Dated: June 16, 2020 Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 16, 2020, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this _______ day of ___________________, 20_____. City Clerk Date: June 16, 2020 Agenda Item #: VII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Steve Olson, Accountant Item Activity: Subject:Accept Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For Year Ending Dec. 31, 2019 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion accepting the 2019 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). INTRODUCTION: CliftonLarsonAllen LLP (CLA), audited the financial statements of the City and issued an unqualified opinion, meaning in their judgment the City's financial records and statements are fairly presented, and in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Michelle Hoffman, CPA, from CLA, the Principle in charge of the audit will present the audit results. ATTACHMENTS: Description Governance Communication Internal Control Letter 2019 CAFR CLA Presentation Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Edina Edina, Minnesota We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019, and have issued our report thereon dated June 8, 2020. We have previously communicated to you information about our responsibilities under auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards, as well as certain information related to the planned scope and timing of our audit. Professional standards also require that we communicate to you the following information related to our audit. Significant audit findings Qualitative aspects of accounting practices Accounting policies Management is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies. The significant accounting policies used by the City are described in Note 1 to the financial statements. No new accounting policies were adopted and the application of existing policies was not changed during 2019. We noted no transactions entered into by the City during the year for which there is a lack of authoritative guidance or consensus. All significant transactions have been recognized in the financial statements in the proper period. Accounting estimates Accounting estimates are an integral part of the financial statements prepared by management and are based on management’s knowledge and experience about past and current events and assumptions about future events. Certain accounting estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significance to the financial statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ significantly from those expected. The most sensitive estimates affecting the financial statements were: Management’s estimate of the valuation of investments is based on published market values as of December 31, 2019. We evaluated the key factors and assumptions used to develop the value of investments in determining that it is reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole. Management’s estimate of the depreciation expense on capital assets is based on management’s estimated useful lives of those assets. We evaluated the key factors and assumptions used to develop the allowance in determining that it is reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Edina, Minnesota Page 2 Management’s estimate of the City’s liability for other postemployment benefits is based on an actuarial determined liability which is based on various assumptions, including investment rates of return, health care trend rates, mortality rates, etc. We evaluated the key factors and assumptions used to develop the liability in determining that it is reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole. Management’s estimate of the City’s liability for compensated absences is based on employee wage information and the City’s policies of earning vacation and sick pay. We evaluated the key factors and assumptions used to develop the liability in determining that it is reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole. Management’s estimate of the City’s proportionate share of PERA’s GERF and PEPFF net pension liabilities as well as the related deferred inflows and outflows is based on guidance from GASB Statement No. 68, and the plans’ allocation tables. The plans’ allocation tables allocate a portion of the plans’ net pension liabilities based on the City’s contributions during the plans’ fiscal years as a percentage of total contributions received for the related fiscal year by the plans. Financial statement disclosures Certain financial statement disclosures are particularly sensitive because of their significance to financial statement users. There were no particularly sensitive financial statement disclosures. The financial statement disclosures are neutral, consistent, and clear. Difficulties encountered in performing the audit We encountered no significant difficulties in dealing with management in performing and completing our audit. Uncorrected misstatements Professional standards require us to accumulate all misstatements identified during the audit, other than those that are clearly trivial, and communicate them to the appropriate level of management. Management has determined that the effects of uncorrected misstatements are immaterial, both individually and in the aggregate, to the financial statements taken as a whole. The following summarizes uncorrected misstatements of the financial statements: o The City passed on posting the following adjustments to remove bond issuance costs which had been incorrectly deferred and amortized as bond discounts: Governmental Activities Net Position $385,961 Governmental Activities Bond Discounts $385,961 Business-Type Activities Net Position $199,857 Business-Type Activities Bond Discounts $199,857 Utility Fund Net Position $109,115 Utility Fund Bond Discounts $109,115 Arena Fund Net Position $25,547 Arena Fund Bond Discounts $25,547 Golf Course Fund Net Position $65,195 Golf Course Fund Bond Discounts $65,195 o The City passed on adjusting beginning net position and due from other government of Governmental Activities in the amount of $601,332 for the City’s unexpended municipal Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Edina, Minnesota Page 3 construction aid fund balance as of December 31, 2018. As a result of this passed adjustment, change in net position of Governmental Activities is overstated by $601,332 for the year ended December 31, 2019. o The City has allocated all of the operating income back to the governmental activities on the statement of activities, rather than allocate it across both governmental and business-type activities, as both utilize the service. This resulted in expenses in the business-type activities being overstated by $210,852 while expenses in the governmental activities were understated by $210,852. Corrected misstatements None of the misstatements detected as a result of audit procedures and corrected by management were material, either individually or in the aggregate, to the financial statements taken as a whole. Disagreements with management For purposes of this letter, a disagreement with management is a financial accounting, reporting, or auditing matter, whether or not resolved to our satisfaction, that could be significant to the financial statements or the auditors’ report. No such disagreements arose during our audit. Management representations We have requested certain representations from management that are included in the management representation letter dated June 8, 2020. Management consultations with other independent accountants In some cases, management may decide to consult with other accountants about auditing and accounting matters, similar to obtaining a “second opinion” on certain situations. If a consultation involves application of an accounting principle to the City’s financial statements or a determination of the type of auditors’ opinion that may be expressed on those statements, our professional standards require the consulting accountant to check with us to determine that the consultant has all the relevant facts. To our knowledge, there were no such consultations with other accountants. Significant issues discussed with management prior to engagement We generally discuss a variety of matters, including the application of accounting principles and auditing standards, with management each year prior to engagement as the City’s auditors. However, these discussions occurred in the normal course of our professional relationship and our responses were not a condition to our engagement. Other information in documents containing audited financial statements With respect to the required supplementary information (RSI) accompanying the financial statements, we made certain inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the RSI, including whether the RSI has been measured and presented in accordance with prescribed guidelines, whether the methods of measurement and preparation have been changed from the prior period and the reasons for any such changes, and whether there were any significant assumptions or interpretations underlying the measurement or presentation of the RSI. We compared the RSI for consistency with management’s responses to the foregoing inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge obtained during the audit of the basic financial statements. Because these limited procedures do not provide sufficient evidence, we did not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the RSI. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Edina, Minnesota Page 4 With respect to the combining and individual nonmajor fund financial statements (collectively, the supplementary information) accompanying the financial statements, on which we were engaged to report in relation to the financial statements as a whole, we made certain inquiries of management and evaluated the form, content, and methods of preparing the information to determine that the information complies with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the method of preparing it has not changed from the prior period or the reasons for such changes, and the information is appropriate and complete in relation to our audit of the financial statements. We compared and reconciled the supplementary information to the underlying accounting records used to prepare the financial statements or to the financial statements themselves. We have issued our report thereon dated June 8, 2020. The introductory, supplementary financial information, and statistical sections accompanying the financial statements, which are the responsibility of management, were prepared for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the financial statements. Such information was not subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and, accordingly, we did not express an opinion or provide any assurance on it. Our auditors’ opinion, the audited financial statements, and the notes to financial statements should only be used in their entirety. Inclusion of the audited financial statements in a document you prepare, such as an annual report, should be done only with our prior approval and review of the document. * * * This communication is intended solely for the information and use of the Mayor, members of the City Council, and management of the City, and is not intended to be, and should not be, used by anyone other than these specified parties. CliftonLarsonAllen LLP Minneapolis, Minnesota June 8, 2020 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Edina Edina, Minnesota We have audited, in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City), as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise City’s basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated June 8, 2020. Internal Control Over Financial Reporting In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered the City’s internal control over financial reporting (internal control) to determine the audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control. A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the entity’s financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance. Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control that we consider to be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. However, material weaknesses may exist that have not been identified. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Edina Compliance and Other Matters As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the City's financial statements are free from material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit and, accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards. Purpose of this Report The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and compliance and the result of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the City’s internal control and compliance. Accordingly, this communication is not suitable for any other purpose. CliftonLarsonAllen LLP Minneapolis, Minnesota June 8, 2020 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT ON MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Edina Edina, Minnesota We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Governmental Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City), as of December 31, 2019, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements and have issued our report thereon dated June 8, 2020. The Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Cities promulgated by the State Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 6.65 contains seven categories of compliance to be tested: contracting and bidding, deposits and investments, conflicts of interest, public indebtedness, claims and disbursements, miscellaneous provisions and tax increment financing. Our audit included all of the listed categories. In connection with our audit, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that the City, failed to comply with the provisions of the Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Cities, insofar as they relate to accounting matters. However, our audit was not directed primarily toward obtaining knowledge of such noncompliance. Accordingly, had we performed additional procedures, other matters may have come to our attention regarding the City’s noncompliance with the above referenced provisions, insofar as they relate to accounting matters. The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of compliance relating to the provisions of the Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Cities and the results of that testing and not to provide an opinion on compliance. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose. CliftonLarsonAllen LLP Minneapolis, Minnesota June 8, 2020 COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2019 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 Prepared by: Department of Finance Donald Uram – Finance Director Kyle Sawyer – Assistant Finance Director CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TABLE OF CONTENTS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 INTRODUCTORY SECTION Letter of Transmittal 1 GFOA Certificate of Achievement 4 Organization 5 Organization Chart 6 FINANCIAL SECTION Independent Auditors’ Report 7 Management’s Discussion and Analysis 10 Basic Financial Statements Government-Wide Financial Statements Statement of Net Position 22 Statement of Activities 23 Fund Financial Statements Balance Sheet – Governmental Funds 25 Reconciliation of the Balance Sheet of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Net Position 26 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances – Governmental Funds 27 Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities 28 Statement of Net Position – Proprietary Funds 29 Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Fund Net Position – Proprietary Funds 30 Statement of Cash Flows – Proprietary Funds 31 Statement of Fiduciary Net Position – Agency Funds 33 Notes to Financial Statements 34 Required Supplementary Information Budgetary Comparison Schedules Budgetary Comparison Schedule – General Fund 73 Budgetary Comparison Schedule – Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) Fund 76 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 Other Postemployment Benefits Plan Schedule of Changes in the City’s Total OPEB Liability and Related Ratios 77 Defined Benefit Pension Plans GERF/PEPFF Retirement Funds 78 GERF Schedule of City’s and Nonemployer Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability and Schedule of City Contributions 78 PEPFF Schedule of City’s Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability and Schedule of City Contributions 79 Notes to Required Supplementary Information 80 Combining and Individual Fund Financial Statements and Schedules Combining Balance Sheet – Nonmajor Governmental Funds 86 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances – Nonmajor Governmental Funds 87 Special Revenue Fund – Community Development Block Grant Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances – Budget and Actual 88 Special Revenue Fund – Police Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances – Budget and Actual 89 Special Revenue Fund – Braemar Memorial Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances – Budget and Actual 90 Special Revenue Fund – Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances – Budget and Actual 91 Special Revenue Fund – Arts and Culture Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances – Budget and Actual 92 Special Revenue Fund – Conservation and Sustainability Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances – Budget and Actual 93 Capital Projects Fund – Environmental Efficiency Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances – Budget and Actual 94 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 Major Governmental Fund – Debt Service Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances – Budget and Actual 95 Major Governmental Fund – Construction Capital Projects Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances – Budget and Actual 96 Combining Statement of Net Position – Nonmajor Proprietary Funds 97 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Fund Net Position – Nonmajor Proprietary Funds 98 Combining Statement of Cash Flows – Nonmajor Proprietary Funds 99 Combining Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities – Agency Funds 100 Supplementary Financial Information 101 Tax Capacity, Tax Levies, and Tax Capacity Rates 101 Combining Schedule of Bonded Indebtedness 102 Schedule of Balance Sheet Accounts – Tax Increment Financing Districts 104 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances – Tax Increment Financing Districts 105 STATISTICAL SECTION (UNAUDITED) Financial Trends Net Position by Component 106 Changes in Net Position 108 Fund Balances of Governmental Funds 110 Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds 112 Revenue Capacity 114 Assessed Value, Actual Value, and Tax Capacity of Taxable Property 114 Direct and Overlapping Tax Capacity Rates 115 Principal Property Tax Payers 116 Property Tax Levies and Collections 117 Debt Capacity 118 Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type 118 Ratios of General Bonded Debt Outstanding 119 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 Direct and Overlapping Governmental Activities Debt 120 Legal Debt Margin Information 121 Pledged Revenue Coverage 122 Demographic and Economic Information 123 Demographic and Economic Statistics 123 Principal Employers 124 Operating Information Full-Time Equivalent City Government Employees by Function 125 Operating Indicators by Function 126 Capital Asset Statistics by Function 127 (1) June 8, 2020 To the Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Citizens of the City of Edina (City): Minnesota statutes require that every city publish within six months of the close of each fiscal year a complete set of audited financial statements. This report is published to fulfill that requirement for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019. Management assumes full responsibility for the completeness and reliability of all of the information presented in this report, based upon a comprehensive framework of internal control that it has established for this purpose. Because the cost of internal control should not exceed anticipated benefits, the objective is to provide reasonable rather than absolute assurance that the financial statements are free from material misstatement. CliftonLarsonAllen, LLP, a firm of licensed certified public accountants, has issued an unmodified (clean) opinion on the City’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019. The independent auditors’ report is located at the front of the financial section of this report. Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) immediately follows the independent auditors’ report and provides a narrative introduction, overview, and analysis of the basic financial statements. The MD&A complements this letter of transmittal and should be read in conjunction with it. Profile of the City The City, incorporated in 1888, is a fully developed first-ring suburb of Minneapolis. The City currently occupies a land area of 16 square miles and serves a population of 52,497. Currently, 98% of the City is developed with 55.5% of the land attributed to residential uses, 13.1% to roadways, and 11.8% supporting the park and open spaces. The remainder of the land is used for commercial, industrial, and public/semi-public uses. The City is empowered to levy a property tax on both real and personal property located within its boundaries. The City has operated under the Council-Manager form of government since 1955. Policy-making and legislative authority are vested in a City Council (Council) consisting of the Mayor and four other members, all elected on a nonpartisan basis. The Council is responsible, among other things, for passing ordinances, adopting the budget, appointing committees, and hiring the City Manager. The City Manager is responsible for carrying out the policies and ordinances of the Council, for overseeing the day-to-day operations of the city government, and for appointing the heads of the various departments. Council members serve four-year terms, with two Council members elected every two years. The Mayor also serves a four-year term. The Council and Mayor are elected at large. The City provides a full range of services, including police and fire protection; the construction and maintenance of highways, streets, and other infrastructure; water and sewer services and recreational and cultural activities and events. The Council is required to adopt a final budget by no later than the close of the previous fiscal year. The annual budget serves as the foundation for the City’s financial planning and control. The budget is prepared by fund, function (e.g. public safety), and department (e.g. police). Department heads may use resources within a department as they see fit. The City Manager may authorize transfers of budgeted amounts between departments. (2) Local Economy The City currently enjoys a favorable economic environment and local indicators point to continued stability. The region, while noted for a strong retail sector, enjoyed considerable re-development in recent years. The re- development consisted of varied manufacturing, medical and high-tech base that adds to the relative stability of the unemployment rate. Major industries with headquarters or divisions within the government’s boundaries or in close proximity include medical services, retail operations and banking services. Edina is home to over 50,000 jobs that are expected to remain stable over the coming years. The City has become known for its quality residential housing stock and attractive neighborhoods. To date, approximately 98% of the available housing stock is in place. Although the emphasis has changed over the years from exclusively single-family housing to a more balanced mix of housing types, the City’s concern for overall quality in residential development remains a top priority. The City enjoys a AAA bond rating and a Aaa bond rating from Standard and Poors and Moody’s, respectively. Long-Term Financial Planning The Metropolitan Council requires all cities in the seven-county metropolitan area to have a Comprehensive Plan and state law requires cities to update their plans every 10 years. The last plan was adopted in 2009. The Comprehensive Plan guides development and redevelopment and addresses changes likely to occur due to various social and market forces. The City updated our Comprehensive Plan and submitted it to the Metropolitan Council for review in 2019. A final version is expected to be adopted by the City Council in 2020. The City continues to focus on quality of life improvements throughout Edina. These efforts cover a broad array of areas including protecting and improving the environment, revitalization of parks and public areas, expanding recreational opportunities, expanding City services, and increasing communication between City representatives and the public. The City is working closely with state government, federal government and neighboring communities to improve the area’s state and county transportation network, which includes upgraded highways and well-placed pathways. Funding for most of the transportation improvements will need to come from state, county, and federal sources, with some minor portion supported by the local taxpayers. Relevant Financial Policies The City has adopted a set of financial management policies that focus on long-term financial planning. Policies cover areas such as cash and investments, the operating budget, revenue, fund balance, capital outlay, and debt management. Assignments for fund balances and compensated absences are all calculated as specified in the policies. In addition, the City has $16,411,412 unassigned fund balance in the general fund. This amount is $1,361,429 above the goal range identified in the policy. Major Initiatives The City is continually working to update our aging infrastructure. Our annually adopted five-year Capital Improvement Plan includes spending and financing projections for these projects. (3) Awards and Acknowledgements The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the City of Edina for its comprehensive annual financial report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018. This was the ninth consecutive year that the government has achieved this prestigious award. To be awarded a Certificate of Achievement, a government must publish an easily readable and efficiently organized comprehensive annual financial report. This report must satisfy both generally accepted accounting principles and applicable legal requirements. A Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only. We believe that our current comprehensive annual financial report continues to meet the Certificate of Achievement Program’s requirements and we are submitting it to the GFOA to determine its eligibility for another certificate. The preparation of this report would not have been possible without the dedicated services of the Finance Department staff. We would like to express our appreciation to all members of the department who assisted and contributed to the preparation of this report. Credit also must be given to the Mayor and the City Council for their unfailing support for maintaining the highest standards of professionalism in the management of the City’s finances. Respectfully submitted, Donald Uram Finance Director Kyle Sawyer Assistant Finance Director (4) CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORGANIZATION DECEMBER 31, 2019 (5) Term Expires Mayor: James Hovland December 31, 2020 Council Members: Mary Brindle December 31, 2020 Mike Fischer December 31, 2020 Kevin Staunton December 31, 2021 Ron Anderson December 31, 2021 City Manager: Scott Neal Appointed Finance Director/Treasurer: Donald Uram Appointed City Clerk: Sharon Allison Appointed (6) (7) INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT City Council and Management City of Edina, Minnesota Report on the Financial Statements We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, the business- type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents. Management’s Responsibility for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Auditors’ Responsibility Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the City’s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions. City Council and Management City of Edina, Minnesota (8) Opinions In our opinion, the financial statements referred to on the previous page present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City as of December 31, 2019, and the respective changes in financial position and, where applicable, cash flows thereof, for the year then ended, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Other Matters Required Supplementary Information Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the management’s discussion and analysis and the required supplementary information (RSI), as listed in the table of contents, be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the RSI in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management’s responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance. Other Information Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements. The introductory section, combining and individual fund financial statements and schedules, supplementary financial information, and statistical section, as listed in the table of contents, are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not required parts of the basic financial statements. The combining and individual fund financial statements and schedules are the responsibility of management and were derived from and relate directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the combining and individual fund financial statements and schedules are fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole. The introductory section, supplementary financial information, and statistical section have not been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on them. City Council and Management City of Edina, Minnesota (9) Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated June 8, 2020 on our consideration of the City’s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, grant agreements, and other matters. The purpose of that report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the City’s internal control over financial reporting and compliance CliftonLarsonAllen LLP Minneapolis, Minnesota June 8, 2020 (This page left blank intentionally.) CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 (10) As management of the City of Edina (the City), we offer readers of the City’s financial statements this narrative overview and analysis of the financial activities of the City for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019. We encourage readers to consider the information presented here in conjunction with additional information that we have furnished in our letter of transmittal, which precedes this report. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS The assets and deferred outflows of resources of the City exceeded its liabilities and deferred inflows of resources at the close of the most recent fiscal year by $289,208,409 (net position). Of this amount, $58,861,920 (unrestricted net position) may be used to meet the City’s ongoing obligations to citizens and creditors in accordance with the City’s fund designations and fiscal policies. The City’s total net position increased by $15,153,190 from current year operations. Of that total, $11,922,200 is the increase in Governmental Activities net position and $3,230,900 is the increase in Business-Type Activities net position. As of the close of the current fiscal year, the City’s governmental funds reported combined ending fund balances of $67,513,935, an increase of $5,250,678 from the prior year. The increase can primarily be attributed to the general obligation bond, series 2019A, that was issued in 2019 in the amount of $5,799,080 (including issuance premium). At the end of the current fiscal year, unassigned fund balance for the general fund was $16,411,412 or 38% of total general fund expenditures. The City’s total bonded debt decreased by $1,497,476 during the current fiscal year, from $112,016,476. The City issued new debt during the year consisting of $10,815,000 general obligation bonds to finance construction of various public street improvement projects, the construction of various utility system improvements, and the acquisition of public safety capital equipment. OVERVIEW OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS This discussion and analysis is intended to serve as an introduction to the City’s basic financial statements. The City’s basic financial statements comprise three components: 1) government-wide financial statements, 2) fund financial statements, and 3) notes to the financial statements. This report also contains other supplementary information in addition to the basic financial statements. Government-wide financial statements. The government-wide financial statements are designed to provide readers with a broad overview of the City’s finances, in a manner similar to a private-sector business. The statement of net position presents information on all of the City’s assets, deferred outflows of resources, liabilities, and deferred inflows of resources, with the difference between them reported as net position. Over time, increases or decreases in net position may serve as a useful indicator of whether the financial position of the City is improving or deteriorating. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 (11) The statement of activities presents information showing how the City’s net position changed during the most recent fiscal year. All changes in net position are reported as soon as the underlying event giving rise to the change occurs, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Thus, revenues and expenses are reported in this statement for some items that will only result in cash flows in future fiscal periods (e.g. uncollected taxes and earned but unused vacation leave). Both of the government-wide financial statements distinguish functions of the City that are principally supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues (governmental activities) from other functions that are intended to recover all or a significant portion of their costs through user fees and charges (business-type activities). The governmental activities of the City include general government, public safety, public works, and parks. The business-type activities of the City include utilities, liquor, aquatic center, golf course, arena, and community activity centers. Fund financial statements. A fund is a grouping of related accounts that is used to maintain control over resources that have been segregated for specific activities or objectives. The City, like other state and local governments, uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance- related legal requirements. All the funds of the City can be divided into three categories: governmental funds, proprietary funds, and fiduciary funds. Governmental funds. Governmental funds are used to account for essentially the same functions reported as governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements. However, unlike the government-wide financial statements, governmental fund financial statements focus on near-term inflows and outflows of spendable resources, as well as on balances of spendable resources available at the end of the fiscal year. Such information may be useful in evaluating a government’s near-term financial requirements. Because the focus of governmental funds is narrower than that of the government-wide financial statements, it is useful to compare the information presented for governmental funds with similar information presented for governmental activities in the government-wide financial statement. By doing so, readers may better understand the long-term impact of the City’s near-term financial decisions. Both the governmental fund balance sheet and governmental fund statement of revenues, expenditures, and change in fund balances provide a reconciliation to facilitate this comparison between governmental funds and governmental activities. The City maintains four individual major governmental funds. Information is presented separately in the governmental fund balance sheet and in the governmental fund statement of revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balances for the general fund, Housing and Redevelopment Authority fund, debt service fund, and the construction fund. Data from the other governmental funds are combined into a single, aggregated presentation. Individual fund data for each of these nonmajor governmental funds are provided in the form of combining statements elsewhere in this report. The City adopts an annual appropriated budget for all governmental and proprietary funds. A budgetary comparison statement has been provided for all governmental funds to demonstrate compliance with these budgets. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 (12) Proprietary funds. The City maintains five major enterprise funds and one internal service fund. Enterprise funds are used to report the same functions presented as business-type activities in the governmental-wide financial statements. The City’s major enterprise funds are used to account for its utility, liquor, aquatic center, golf course, and arena operations. Data from the other enterprise funds are combined into a single, aggregated presentation. Individual fund data for each of these nonmajor enterprise funds are provided in the form of combining statements elsewhere in this report. Proprietary funds provide the same type of information as the government-wide financial statements, only in more detail. Internal service funds. Internal service funds are used as an accounting device to accumulate and allocate costs internally among the City’s various functions. The City uses its internal service fund to account for insurance, safety and prevention measures, and risk management activities. Because the internal service activities predominantly benefit government rather than business-type functions, these services have been included within governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements. Fiduciary funds. Fiduciary funds are used to account for resources held for the benefit of parties outside the government. Fiduciary funds are not reflected in the government-wide financial statements because the resources of those funds are not available to support the City’s own programs. The accounting used for fiduciary funds is much like that used for proprietary funds. Notes to the financial statements. The notes provide additional information that is essential to a full understanding of the data provided in the government–wide and fund financial statements. Other information. The combining and individual fund financial statements and schedules referred to earlier in connection with nonmajor governmental and enterprise funds are presented immediately following the required supplementary information. Supplementary financial information and the statistical section are the final two items presented. GOVERNMENT-WIDE FINANCIAL ANALYSIS As noted earlier, net position may serve over time as a useful indicator of a government’s financial position. In the case of the City, assets and deferred outflows of resources exceeded liabilities and deferred inflows of resources by $289,208,409 at the close of the most recent fiscal year. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 (13) The largest portion of the City’s net position ($191,122,918 or 66%) reflects its investment in capital assets (e.g. land, buildings, machinery, and equipment) less any related debt used to acquire those assets that is still outstanding. The City uses these capital assets to provide services to citizens; consequently, these assets are not available for future spending. Although the City’s investment in its capital assets is reported net of related debt, it should be noted that the resources needed to repay this debt must be provided from other sources, since the capital assets themselves cannot be used to liquidate these liabilities. City of Edina’s Net Position 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 Assets: Current and Other Assets 102,772,182$ 94,235,554$ 41,566,836$ 39,131,188$ 144,339,018$ 133,366,742$ Capital Assets 177,046,643 171,961,244 132,455,693 131,270,232 309,502,336 303,231,476 Total Assets 279,818,825$ 266,196,798$ 174,022,529$ 170,401,420$ 453,841,354$ 436,598,218$ Deferred Outflows of Resources: OPEB Plan Deferments $ 198,552 $ 202,183 $ 14,361 $ 14,635 $ 212,913 $ 216,818 Pension Plan Deferments 10,433,540 14,052,021 403,276 865,438 10,836,816 14,917,459 Total Deferred Outflows of Resources $ 10,632,092 $ 14,254,204 $ 417,637 $ 880,073 $ 11,049,729 $ 15,134,277 Liabilities: Long-Term Liabilities Outstanding 85,067,742$ 83,842,411$ 51,218,382$ 49,979,000$ 136,286,124$ 133,821,411$ Other Liabilities 14,266,374 13,420,763 8,488,312 9,449,610 22,754,686 22,870,373 Total Liabilities 99,334,116$ 97,263,174$ 59,706,694$ 59,428,610$ 159,040,810$ 156,691,784$ Deferred Inflows of Resources: OPEB Plan Deferments 148,823$ -$ 11,202$ -$ 160,025$ -$ Pension Plan Deferments 15,617,659 19,759,709 864,180 1,225,783 16,481,839 20,985,492 Total Deferred Inflows of Resources 15,766,482$ 19,759,709$ 875,382$ 1,225,783$ 16,641,864$ 20,985,492$ Net Position: Net Investment in Capital Assets 110,670,335$ 107,133,225$ 80,452,583$ 81,980,815$ 191,122,918$ 189,114,040$ Restricted 36,999,647 25,017,586 1,360,336 1,360,336 38,359,983 26,377,922 Unrestricted 27,680,337 31,277,308 32,045,171 27,285,949 59,725,508 58,563,257 Total Net Position 175,350,319$ 163,428,119$ 113,858,090$ 110,627,100$ 289,208,409$ 274,055,219$ Governmental Activities Business-Type Activities Total A portion of the City’s net position ($38,359,983) represents resources that are subject to external restrictions on how they may be used. The remaining balance of unrestricted net position ($59,725,508) may be used to meet the City’s ongoing obligations to citizens and creditors. At the end of the current fiscal year, the City is able to report positive balances in all of the categories of net position reported, both for the government as a whole, as well as for its separate governmental and business-type activities. The same situation held true for the prior fiscal year. There was an increase of $1,162,251 in unrestricted net position. The decrease in deferred outflows of resources relates to the changes in the City’s share of state pension plan amounts while the increase in long-term liabilities is the result of newly issued debt in 2019, partially offset by regularly scheduled payments on the City’s outstanding bonds. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 (14) As shown below, the City’s net position increased by $15,153,190 during the current fiscal year. Factors contributing to this change are discussed in the next two sections. City of Edina’s Changes in Net Position 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 Revenues: Program Revenues: Charges for Services 12,217,896$ 13,577,083$ 45,119,284$ 44,426,345$ 57,337,180$ 58,003,428$ Operating Grants and Contributions 4,271,243 4,028,247 44,953 545,682 4,316,196 4,573,929 Capital Grants and Contributions 6,625,040 6,695,172 692,281 - 7,317,321 6,695,172 General Revenues: Property Taxes 37,133,269 35,616,432 - - 37,133,269 35,616,432 Other Taxes 8,352,953 7,582,447 - - 8,352,953 7,582,447 Gain on Disposal of Assets 408,659 5,032,815 - - 408,659 5,032,815 Unrestricted Investment Earnings 2,037,306 901,405 1,064,942 481,754 3,102,248 1,383,159 Total Revenues 71,046,366 73,433,601 46,921,460 45,453,781 117,967,826 118,887,382 Expenses: General Government 11,252,538 10,964,266 - - 11,252,538 10,964,266 Public Safety 22,485,722 20,971,184 - - 22,485,722 20,971,184 Public Works 15,990,021 14,170,463 - - 15,990,021 14,170,463 Parks 7,554,919 7,235,405 - - 7,554,919 7,235,405 Interest on Long-Term Debt 1,999,318 1,726,901 - - 1,999,318 1,726,901 Utilities - - 19,303,212 18,045,516 19,303,212 18,045,516 Liquor - - 11,970,986 11,995,159 11,970,986 11,995,159 Aquatic Center - - 979,376 996,671 979,376 996,671 Golf Course - - 4,009,097 2,464,563 4,009,097 2,464,563 Arena - - 2,982,674 2,996,844 2,982,674 2,996,844 Community Activity Centers - - 4,286,773 4,096,452 4,286,773 4,096,452 Total Expenses 59,282,518 55,068,219 43,532,118 40,595,205 102,814,636 95,663,424 Increase in Net Position Before Transfers 11,763,848 18,365,382 3,389,342 4,858,576 15,153,190 23,223,958 Transfers 158,352 305,428 (158,352) (305,428) - - Change in Net Position 11,922,200 18,670,810 3,230,990 4,553,148 15,153,190 23,223,958 Net Position - January 1 163,428,119 144,757,309 110,627,100 106,073,952 274,055,219 250,831,261 Net Position - December 31 175,350,319$ 163,428,119$ 113,858,090$ 110,627,100$ 289,208,409$ 274,055,219$ Governmental Activities Business-Type Activities Total CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 (15) GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES Governmental activities increased the City’s net position by $11,922,200, accounting for 79% of the total growth in net position. Key elements of the increase are as follows. Charges for services decreased by $1,359,187, or 10% in 2019. This is due primarily to a reduction in building and other permit fees. Property taxes increased by $1,516,837 as the result of an increased general operating levy that provides funding to continue existing service levels. Other taxes increased by $770,506 due to an increase in tax increment collections from the Southdale 2 tax increment financing district and utility franchise fee rate increases. Investment earnings increased by $1,135,901, or 126% in 2019 due to increased interest rates. Gain on disposal of assets decreased $4,624,156 due to the sale of land in the 50th and France 2 TIF district that is being redeveloped for mixed use, in the prior year. Below are specific graphs which provide comparisons of the governmental activities revenues and expenses: CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 (16) BUSINESS-TYPE ACTIVITIES Business-type activities increased net position by $3,230,990, accounting for 21% of the City’s growth in net position. Key elements of the current year increase are as follows: The utility fund had income before contributions and transfers of $3,994,597 for 2019. This additional equity is used to invest in new and rebuilt utility infrastructure according to the City’s CIP and utility rate study. The liquor fund had income before contributions and transfers of $1,190,725 for 2019. Most of the additional equity is used to subsidize operations at other enterprise facilities and for capital improvements at the three city owned liquor stores. The golf course fund had a loss before contributions and transfers of $579,761 for 2019. This is partially due to the increased expenses associated with opening the new championship 18-hole course in 2019 and the extreme wet weather causing a reduction in expected revenues. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 (17) FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE CITY’S FUNDS As noted earlier, the City uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance- related legal requirements. Governmental funds. The focus of the City’s governmental funds is to provide information on near- term inflows, outflows, and balances of spendable resources. Such information is useful in assessing the City’s financing requirements. In particular, unassigned fund balance may serve as a useful measure of a government’s net resources available for spending at the end of the fiscal year. At the end of the current fiscal year, the City’s governmental funds reported combined ending fund balances of $67,513,935, an increase of $5,250,678 in comparison with the prior year. Approximately 24% of this total amount ($16,411,412) constitutes unassigned fund balance. The remainder of the fund balance is 1) restricted by external creditors, grantors, laws, or regulations ($27,053,111), or 2) assigned by internal constraints ($24,021,009), or 3) nonspendable in the form of prepaid items ($28,403). The general fund is the chief operating fund of the City. At the end of the current fiscal year, unassigned fund balance of the general fund was $16,411,412. As a measure of the general fund’s liquidity, unassigned fund balance represents 38% of total general fund expenditures. The fund balance of the City’s general fund decreased by $1,288,064 during the current fiscal year. Key factors related to this decrease include: Total general fund revenues were $1,889,329 over budget, including higher than expected building permit activity, investment income and ambulance service collections. Investment income increased by over 100% due to the increase in short-term rates. Total general fund expenditures were $35,977 under budget. The liquor fund transferred $50,000 of profits to the general fund, as planned in the 2019 budget. Transfers out of the general fund totaled $3,388,864 related to the 2018 unassigned fund balance transferred to fund various projects including the acquisition of a new Enterprise Resource Planning system and a transfer of Park Dedication funds to help pay for Arden Park. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority fund balance increased by $3,127,853 in the current fiscal year due to the sale of a retail pad constructed as part of the expansion of the north parking ramp in the 50th and France 2 TIF district, higher than anticipated investment income and tax increment collections in the Southdale 2 and Pentagon Park districts. The debt service fund has a total fund balance of $8,341,996, all of which is restricted for the payment of debt service. The net increase in fund balance during the current year in the debt service fund was $470,138. Fund balance increased as the result of a $3,100,000 transfer in from the construction fund to pay debt service. This transfer is made annually with the amount varying slightly depending on available resources. The construction fund balance increased by $2,200,906 in 2019 due to transfers in of $3,588,864; $2,458,564 of the transfer is from the 2018 general fund surplus and $930,300 is from Park Dedication. In addition, new debt was issued in 2019 to help finance various street improvement projects and property tax revenue increased as budgeted. Lastly, of the 2016 and 2017 general fund surplus transfers, $2,048,902 remains to be spent. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 (18) Proprietary funds. The City’s proprietary funds provide the same type of information found in the government-wide financial statements, but in more detail. Unrestricted net position of the utility fund at the end of the year amounted to $27,496,800. The total growth in net position from current year operations was $3,633,097. Operating revenues in the utilities fund decreased by 4.0% while expenses increased by 6.0% in 2019. The revenue increase was due to an increase in the water, sewer, and storm rates. Expenses increased because of higher depreciation expenses related to infrastructure projects completed in recent years, along with increased fees set by the Metropolitan Council for sewer service. The City invested $8,250,321 in utility fund capital assets during 2019. Unrestricted net position of the liquor fund at the end of the year amounted to $1,763,922. Total net position increased by $343,015 from current year operations. The liquor fund continues to transfer profits back into other City funds, including the general, construction, golf course, arena, centennial lakes, and art center funds. The liquor fund made transfers totaling $850,000 to other funds during 2019. Unrestricted net position of the aquatic center fund at the end of the year amounted to $805,127. Aquatic center revenues decreased by $949 from 2018. Expenses decreased by 1.9% from 2018 due to reduced personnel costs resulting from weather closures and a decrease in depreciation expense. Unrestricted net position of the golf course fund at the end of the year amounted to a deficit of ($910,127) an increase of $44,068 from the prior year. The 27-hole regulation course closed in October 2016 and was closed for all of 2017 and 2018 for renovations. The new championship course opened in 2019 and continued increases to net position are expected. Unrestricted net position of the arena fund at the end of the year amounted to $308,096, an improvement of $311,225 from the prior year. Revenues decreased by $109,359 due to a slight decrease in “prime” ice utilization while expenses decreased by $26,360 due to a reduction in personnel costs based on improved staff scheduling and overall management. GENERAL FUND BUDGETARY HIGHLIGHTS During the year, there was a $2,458,564 increase in appropriations between the original and final amended budget. The increase is the result of transfers to the construction fund of unassigned general fund balance according to the City’s fund balance policy and a transfer of Park Dedication Funds. During the year, revenues were $1,889,329 more than budget, as the continued commercial and residential redevelopment of the City increased our licenses and permits, which exceeded budget by $395,564. Intergovernmental revenue exceeded budget by $331,467 as a result of receiving miscellaneous state grants and police and fire aid. In addition, Charges for Services revenue exceeded budget by $669,182 due primarily to the collection of delayed ambulance revenue. Investment income also exceeded budget by $510,274. During the year, expenditures were slightly under budget by $35,977. Savings in public works and parks helped offset the increase in costs in other departments due to increased staffing and other personnel related costs. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 (19) CAPITAL ASSET AND DEBT ADMINISTRATION Capital assets. The City’s investment in capital assets for its governmental and business-type activities as of December 31, 2019, amounted to $309,502,336 (net of accumulated depreciation). This investment in capital assets included land, land improvements, intangible assets such as easements, infrastructure assets (roads, bridges, sidewalks, and similar items), buildings, vehicles, equipment, parks, and construction in progress. The total increase in the City’s investment in capital assets for the current fiscal year was 2.1% (a 3% increase for governmental activities and a 0.9% increase for business-type activities). Major capital asset events during the current fiscal year included the following: The City completed construction on the new 18-hole championship golf course; total construction cost was $ 6,819,706. A variety of street construction, sidewalk and park projects; construction in progress as of the close of the fiscal year reached $8,328,757. A variety of utility infrastructure improvements, including water main, sanitary and storm sewer, construction in progress as of the close of the fiscal year reached $ 8,332,765 in the utility fund. The City completed the Minnehaha Trunk Sewer Rehab project; total construction cost was $1,349,895. The City purchased land for affordable housing at 4100 W 76th St. for $2,893,443. City of Edina’s Capital Assets (Net of Depreciation) 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 Land and Land Improvements 30,018,596$ 27,745,212$ 4,330,571$ 4,717,671$ 34,349,167$ 32,462,883$ Easements 253,000 253,000 35,600 35,600 288,600 288,600 Buildings and Structures 37,231,178 38,473,420 25,776,295 20,495,352 63,007,473 58,968,772 Machinery and Equipment 7,897,025 6,109,270 5,832,585 6,085,782 13,729,610 12,195,052 Infrastructure 84,022,848 73,334,806 88,071,369 86,488,485 172,094,217 159,823,291 Parks 9,295,239 10,006,261 - - 9,295,239 10,006,261 Construction in Progress 8,328,757 16,039,275 8,409,273 13,447,342 16,738,030 29,486,617 Total 177,046,643$ 171,961,244$ 132,455,693$ 131,270,232$ 309,502,336$ 303,231,476$ Governmental Activities Business-Type Activities Total Additional information on the City’s capital assets can be found in Note 3. Long-term debt. At the end of the current fiscal year, the City had total bonded long-term debt outstanding of $110,519,000, a decrease of $1,497,476 from 2018. This decrease resulted from payment of regularly scheduled principal payments, partially offset by $10,815,000 of new debt issued. $19,905,000 is for general obligation improvement debt that is supported by property tax levies and special assessments. This amount increased from 2018 due to new debt issued of $2,805,000 being partially offset by regularly scheduled principal payments. $25,105,000 is for permanent improvement revolving (PIR) bonds, which finance the City’s street reconstruction program. This amount decreased from 2018 due to regularly scheduled principal payments partially offset by newly issued debt of $2,195,000. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 (20) Also outstanding is $17,360,000 HRA public project revenue bonds which financed two gymnasiums, the new public works facility, sports dome, outdoor rink at the arena, and improvements to Pamela Park. This amount decreased from 2018 due to regularly scheduled principal payments. There is a total of $48,149,000 in revenue bonds for improvements to the enterprise funds. This amount decreased $719,000 during the year due to $5,815,000 in issued debt offset by $6,534,000 in regularly scheduled principal payments. City of Edina’s Outstanding Debt 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 General Obligation Bonds 19,905,000$ 19,155,000$ -$ -$ 19,905,000$ 19,155,000$ Public Improvement Bonds 25,105,000 25,540,000 - - 25,105,000 25,540,000 Public Project Revenue Bonds 17,360,000 18,440,000 - - 17,360,000 18,440,000 Edina Emerald Energy Program Bonds - 13,476 - - - 13,476 Revenue Bonds - - 48,149,000 48,868,000 48,149,000 48,868,000 Total 62,370,000$ 63,148,476$ 48,149,000$ 48,868,000$ 110,519,000$ 112,016,476$ Governmental Activities Business-Type Activities Total The City maintains an Aaa rating from Moody’s and an AAA rating from Standard & Poor’s. State statutes limit the amount of general obligation debt a Minnesota city may issue up to 3% of total Estimated Market Value. The current debt limitation for the City is $368,150,179. Only $37,595,000 of the City’s outstanding debt is counted within the statutory limitation. Additional information on the City’s long-term debt can be found in Note 4. ECONOMIC FACTORS AND NEXT YEAR’S BUDGET The City strives to provide an uncommonly high quality of life for our residents and businesses and the relatively healthy local economy helps to make this goal a reality. The unemployment rate in Edina for December 2019 was 2.2%, well below the state and national levels. The City is home to Southdale Center, the nation’s first fully enclosed climate-controlled regional shopping mall, Fairview Southdale hospital, as well as several corporate headquarters. In addition to its healthy economy, Edina is known for excellent public schools, as the Edina school system has been consistently selected as one of the best in the country. Ninety-eight percent of students graduate, with eighty-eight percent pursuing some sort of post-secondary education. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 (21) Property values in Edina decreased for several years from 2009-2012 and have risen each year since. Estimated market value of real estate increased 4.0% for taxes payable in 2019. The City collects property taxes based on tax capacity, which roughly equals estimated market value multiplied by class rates for different types of parcels (commercial, residential, etc.). Class rates are set by state statute. Tax capacity for real estate increased 4.2% for taxes payable in 2019 and remained positive for the seventh consecutive year. All these factors above were considered in preparing the City’s budget for the 2020 fiscal year. The City’s adopted 2020 budget includes a property tax levy of $39,659,543 for all funds, an increase of 6.0% from the 2019 levy, with the increase being attributed to increased levies for the City’s equipment replacement expenditures, HRA operating expenditures, and general operating levy. REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION This financial report is designed to provide a general overview of the City’s finances for all those with an interest in the government’s finances. Questions concerning any of the information provided in this report or requests for additional financial information should be addressed to the Office of the Finance Director, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424. The City’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report can also be found on the internet at www.edinamn.gov. (This page left blank intentionally.) CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF NET POSITION DECEMBER 31, 2019 See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements. (22) Governmental Business-Type Activities Activities Total ASSETS Current Assets: Cash and Investments 70,331,869$ 32,790,578$ 103,122,447$ Restricted Cash and Investments 269,369 - 269,369 Accrued Interest 187,422 92,029 279,451 Accounts Receivable, Net 2,705,216 5,975,015 8,680,231 Special Assessments Receivable 22,824,309 331,548 23,155,857 Due from Other Governments 3,006,692 8,245 3,014,937 Prepaid Items 176,952 514,601 691,553 Inventory - 1,854,820 1,854,820 Total Current Assets 99,501,829 41,566,836 141,068,665 Noncurrent Assets: Investment in Joint Powers Agreement 1,770,353 - 1,770,353 Loans Receivable 1,500,000 - 1,500,000 Nondepreciable Capital Assets 32,696,875 13,768,283 46,465,158 Depreciable Capital Assets (Net) 144,349,768 118,687,410 263,037,178 Total Noncurrent Assets 180,316,996 132,455,693 312,772,689 Total Assets 279,818,825 174,022,529 453,841,354 DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES OPEB Plan Deferments 198,552 14,361 212,913 Defined Benefit Pension Plans 10,433,540 403,276 10,836,816 Total Deferred Outflows of Resources 10,632,092 417,637 11,049,729 LIABILITIES Current Liabilities: Accounts Payable 2,712,299 1,029,418 3,741,717 Salaries Payable 1,051,850 211,987 1,263,837 Accrued Interest Payable 863,588 712,473 1,576,061 Contracts Payable 597,707 350,215 947,922 Due to Other Governments 23,151 187,581 210,732 Deposits Payable 1,386,687 - 1,386,687 Unearned Revenue 171,674 277,867 449,541 Compensated Absences Payable 1,594,418 262,771 1,857,189 Bonds Payable 5,865,000 5,456,000 11,321,000 Total Current Liabilities 14,266,374 8,488,312 22,754,686 Noncurrent Liabilities: Total OPEB Liability 3,309,596 307,916 3,617,512 Net Pension Liability 19,452,918 4,319,414 23,772,332 Compensated Absences Payable 2,391,627 394,157 2,785,784 Bonds and Loans Payable, Net 59,913,601 46,196,895 106,110,496 Total Noncurrent Liabilities 85,067,742 51,218,382 136,286,124 Total Liabilities 99,334,116 59,706,694 159,040,810 DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES OPEB Plan Deferments 148,823 11,202 160,025 Defined Benefit Pension Plans 15,617,659 864,180 16,481,839 Total Deferred Inflows of Resources 15,766,482 875,382 16,641,864 NET POSITION Net Investment in Capital Assets 110,670,335 80,452,583 191,122,918 Restricted for Tax Increments 14,676,453 - 14,676,453 Restricted for Affordable Housing 1,547,145 - 1,547,145 Restricted for Debt Service 9,664,560 1,360,336 11,024,896 Restricted for Pedestrian and Cyclist Improvements 492,057 - 492,057 Restricted for Highway Construction 2,449,459 - 2,449,459 Restricted for Parkland Dedication 58,086 - 58,086 Restricted for Police 713,658 - 713,658 Restricted for Braemar Golf Donations 123,682 - 123,682 Restricted for Arts and Culture Donations 47,077 - 47,077 Restricted for Conservation and Sustainability Initiatives 1,053,089 - 1,053,089 Unrestricted 33,854,718 32,045,171 65,899,889 Total Net Position 175,350,319$ 113,858,090$ 289,208,409$ Primary Government CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements. (23) Operating Capital Charges for Grants and Grants and Expenses Services Contributions Contributions Functions/Programs Primary Government: Governmental Activities: General Government 11,252,538$ 1,204,947$ 609,083$ -$ Public Safety 22,485,722 9,747,031 1,557,519 - Public Works 15,990,021 436,124 2,006,631 6,625,040 Parks 7,554,919 829,794 98,010 - Interest on Long-Term Debt 1,999,318 - - - Total Government Activities 59,282,518 12,217,896 4,271,243 6,625,040 Business-Type Activities: Utilities 19,303,212 21,875,655 - 692,281 Liquor 11,970,986 13,094,407 2,060 - Aquatic Center 979,376 996,778 10,900 - Golf Course 4,009,097 3,395,815 800 - Arena 2,982,674 2,516,629 - - Community Activity Centers 4,286,773 3,240,000 31,193 - Total Business-Type Activities 43,532,118 45,119,284 44,953 692,281 Total Primary Government 102,814,636$ 57,337,180$ 4,316,196$ 7,317,321$ Program Revenues CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES (CONTINUED) YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements. (24) Governmental Business-Type Activities Activities Total (9,438,508)$ -$ (9,438,508)$ (11,181,172) - (11,181,172) (6,922,226) - (6,922,226) (6,627,115) - (6,627,115) (1,999,318) - (1,999,318) (36,168,339) - (36,168,339) - 3,264,724 3,264,724 - 1,125,481 1,125,481 - 28,302 28,302 - (612,482) (612,482) - (466,045) (466,045) - (1,015,580) (1,015,580) - 2,324,400 2,324,400 (36,168,339) 2,324,400 (33,843,939) General Revenues: Property Taxes 37,133,269 - 37,133,269 Tax Increment Collections 5,447,108 - 5,447,108 Franchise Taxes 2,881,726 - 2,881,726 Lodging Taxes 24,119 - 24,119 Unrestricted Investment Earnings 2,037,306 1,064,942 3,102,248 Gain on Disposal of Capital Assets 408,659 - 408,659 Transfers - Capital Assets (91,270) 91,270 - Transfers - Internal Activities 249,622 (249,622) - Total General Revenues and Transfers 48,090,539 906,590 48,997,129 Change in Net Position 11,922,200 3,230,990 15,153,190 Net Position - Beginning 163,428,119 110,627,100 274,055,219 Net Position - Ending 175,350,319$ 113,858,090$ 289,208,409$ Net (Expense) Revenue and Changes in Net Position CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA BALANCE SHEET GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS DECEMBER 31, 2019 See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements. (25) Housing and Nonmajor Total Redevelopment Debt Governmental Governmental General Authority Service Construction Funds Funds ASSETS Cash and Investments 20,804,809$ 14,781,752$ 8,052,231$ 22,791,225$ 2,040,512$ 68,470,529$ Restricted Cash and Investments - - 269,369 - - 269,369 Accrued Interest 58,660 46,836 - 73,200 4,304 183,000 Accounts Receivable 693,835 80,531 - 1,137,642 540,859 2,452,867 Taxes Receivable 188,630 (483) 24,982 18,618 132 231,879 Special Assessments Receivable - - 2,161,170 20,663,139 - 22,824,309 Due from Other Governments 375,208 11,731 23,396 2,569,276 15,294 2,994,905 Prepaid items 28,403 - - - - 28,403 Loans Receivable - 1,500,000 - - - 1,500,000 Total Assets 22,149,545$ 16,420,367$ 10,531,148$ 47,253,100$ 2,601,101$ 98,955,261$ LIABILITIES Accounts Payable 863,290$ 63,616$ 3,000$ 1,734,633$ 40,536$ 2,705,075$ Salaries Payable 1,038,399 4,422 - 3,449 5,580 1,051,850 Contracts Payable - 15,731 - 456,554 125,422 597,707 Due to Other Governments 22,204 - - - - 22,204 Deposits Payable 1,386,687 - - - - 1,386,687 Unearned Revenue 58,674 113,000 - - - 171,674 Total Liabilities 3,369,254 196,769 3,000 2,194,636 171,538 5,935,197 DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES Unavailable Revenue - Taxes 188,630 - 24,982 12,815 132 226,559 Unavailable Revenue - Special Assessments - - 2,161,170 20,668,941 - 22,830,111 Unavailable Revenue - Other - - - 2,449,459 - 2,449,459 Total Deferred Inflows of Resources 188,630 - 2,186,152 23,131,215 132 25,506,129 FUND BALANCE Nonspendable 28,403 - - - - 28,403 Restricted 58,086 16,223,598 8,341,996 - 2,429,431 27,053,111 Assigned 2,093,760 - - 21,927,249 - 24,021,009 Unassigned 16,411,412 - - - - 16,411,412 Total Fund Balance 18,591,661 16,223,598 8,341,996 21,927,249 2,429,431 67,513,935 Total Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of Resources, and Fund Balances 22,149,545$ 16,420,367$ 10,531,148$ 47,253,100$ 2,601,101$ 98,955,261$ CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA RECONCILIATION OF THE BALANCE SHEET OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS TO THE STATEMENT OF NET POSITION DECEMBER 31, 2019 See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements. (26) Total Fund Balances - Governmental Funds 67,513,935$ Amounts reported for governmental activities in the Statement of Net Position are different because: Capital assets are included in net position, but are excluded from fund balances because they do not represent financial resources. Cost of Capital Assets 320,584,106 Accumulated Depreciation (143,537,463) Long-term liabilities are included in net positon, but are excluded from fund balances until due and payable. Debt issuance premiums and discounts are excluded from net position until amortized, but are included in fund balances upon issuance as other financing sources and uses. Bonds Payable (62,370,000) Loans Payable (750,000) Premium on Bonds (2,658,601) Compensated Absences Payable (3,986,045) Total OPEB Liability (3,309,596) Net Pension Liability (19,452,918) Accrued interest payable on long-term debt is included in net position, but is excluded from fund balances until due and payable.(863,588) Investment in joint powers agreement are not available to pay for current-period expenditures, and therefore, are not reported in the funds.1,770,353 The recognition of certain revenues and expenditures differ between the full accrual governmental activities financial statements and the modified accrual governmental fund financial statements. Deferred Outflows - OPEB 198,552 Deferred Outflows - Pension 10,433,540 Deferred Inflows - OPEB (148,823) Deferred Inflows - Pension (15,617,659) Deferred Inflows - Property Taxes 226,559 Deferred Inflows - Special Assessments 22,830,111 Deferred Inflows - Other 2,449,459 Internal service funds are used by management to charge the costs of certain activities to individual funds. The assets and liabilities of the internal service fund are included in the governmental activities in the statement of net position.2,038,397 Total Net Position - Governmental Activities 175,350,319$ CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements. (27) Housing and Nonmajor Total Redevelopment Debt Governmental Governmental General Authority Service Construction Funds Funds REVENUES General Property Taxes 29,743,751$ 158,923$ 4,565,604$ 2,604,796$ 20,000$ 37,093,074$ Tax Increment Collections - 5,447,108 - - - 5,447,108 Franchise Taxes 821,932 - - 72,724 1,987,070 2,881,726 Lodging Tax 24,119 - - - - 24,119 Special Assessments - - 271,018 4,470,539 - 4,741,557 License and Permits 5,109,994 - - 73,760 - 5,183,754 Intergovernmental 1,585,444 - - 1,802,211 299,965 3,687,620 Charges for Services 5,190,705 47,457 - 193,779 - 5,431,941 Fines and Forfeitures 988,254 - - - 108,868 1,097,122 Investment Income 630,274 499,356 1,571 816,797 41,883 1,989,881 Rental of Property 487,797 - - - - 487,797 Other Revenues 152,260 160,000 - 68,570 220,075 600,905 Total Revenues 44,734,530 6,312,844 4,838,193 10,103,176 2,677,861 68,666,604 EXPENDITURES Current: General Government 7,568,505 753,443 - 174,031 477,215 8,973,194 Public Safety 21,514,903 - - 46,020 140,331 21,701,254 Public Works 8,302,557 - - 473,397 222,814 8,998,768 Parks 5,413,259 - - 11,325 29,194 5,453,778 Capital Outlay: General Government - 4,066,448 - 2,132,326 - 6,198,774 Public Safety - - - 3,449,492 12,926 3,462,418 Public Works - - - 5,369,985 932,723 6,302,708 Parks - - - 2,471,310 122,813 2,594,123 Debt Service: Bond Principal - - 5,778,476 - - 5,778,476 Interest and Fiscal Charges - - 1,923,526 - - 1,923,526 Total Expenditures 42,799,224 4,819,891 7,702,002 14,127,886 1,938,016 71,387,019 REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES 1,935,306 1,492,953 (2,863,809) (4,024,710) 739,845 (2,720,415) OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) Transfers In 165,494 - 3,100,000 3,588,864 - 6,854,358 Transfers Out (3,388,864) - - (3,215,872) - (6,604,736) Sale of Capital Assets - 884,900 - 287,491 - 1,172,391 Long-Term Loans Issued - 750,000 - - - 750,000 Bonds Issued - - 233,947 4,766,053 - 5,000,000 Premium on Bonds Issued - - - 799,080 - 799,080 Total Other Financing Sources (Uses) (3,223,370) 1,634,900 3,333,947 6,225,616 - 7,971,093 NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE (1,288,064) 3,127,853 470,138 2,200,906 739,845 5,250,678 Fund balance - January 1, as Restated 19,879,725 13,095,745 7,871,858 19,726,343 1,689,586 62,263,257 FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 18,591,661$ 16,223,598$ 8,341,996$ 21,927,249$ 2,429,431$ 67,513,935$ CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA RECONCILIATION OF THE STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS TO THE STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements. (28) Total Net Change in Fund Balances - Governmental Funds 5,250,678$ Amounts reported for governmental activities in the Statement of Activities are different because: Capital assets are recorded in net position and the cost is allocated over their estimated useful lives as depreciation expense. However, fund balances are reduced for the full cost of capital outlays at the time of purchase. Capital Outlays 15,727,542 Depreciation Expense (9,787,141) Capital Assets Transferred to Business-Type Funds (91,270) A gain or loss on the disposal of capital assets, including the difference between the carrying value and any related sale proceeds, is included in the change in net position. However, only the sale proceeds and insurance recoveries are included in the change in fund balances. Proceeds from the Sale of Capital Assets (1,172,391) Gain on the Sale of Capital Assets 408,659 Revenues in the statement of activities that do not provide current financial resources (property tax and special assessment receivables) are not reported as revenues in the funds.1,923,678 The amount of debt issued, principal as well as any issuance premiums or discounts, are reported in the governmental funds as a source of financing. Debt obligations are not revenues in the Statement of Activities, but rather constitute long-term liabilities.(6,549,080) Repayment of long-term debt does not affect the change in net position. However, it reduces fund balances.5,778,476 Interest on long-term debt is included in the change in net position as it accrues, regardless of when payment is due. However, they are included in the change in fund balances when due.(45,111) Debt issuance premiums and discounts are included in the change in net position as they are amortized over the life of the debt. Amortization for the current year is included in interest expense on the Statement of Activities. (30,681) Pension and Other Postemployment Benefit (OPEB) expenditures in the governmental funds are measured by current year employer contributions. Pension and OPEB expenses on the Statement of Activities are measured by the change in the Net Pension Liability/Total OPEB Liability and the related deferred inflows and outflows of resources. Pension 24,671 OPEB (252,556) In the governmental funds, compensated absences expenditures are measured by the amount of financial resources used (amounts actually paid). In the Statement of Activities, however, compensated absences expenses are measured by the amounts earned during the year. Compensated Absences 124,924 Internal service funds are used by management to charge the costs of certain activities to individual funds. The change in net position of the internal service funds is included in the governmental activities in the statement of activities.611,802 Change in Net Position - Governmental Activities 11,922,200$ CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF NET POSITION PROPRIETARY FUNDS DECEMBER 31, 2019 See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements. (29) Governmental Activities Risk Nonmajor Total Management Aquatic Golf Enterprise Enterprise Internal Utilities Liquor Center Course Arena Funds Funds Service Fund ASSETS Current Assets: Cash and Investments 23,528,150$ 1,876,930$ 2,170,718$ 201,386$ 842,957$ 4,170,437$ 32,790,578$ 1,861,340$ Interest Receivable 61,575 6,103 7,171 2,169 1,349 13,662 92,029 4,422 Accounts Receivable, Net 5,592,513 6,753 - 29,733 238,372 107,644 5,975,015 20,470 Special Assessments Receivable 331,548 - - - - - 331,548 - Due from Other Governments 8,245 - - - - - 8,245 11,787 Prepaid Expenses 474,680 39,085 - 836 - - 514,601 148,549 Inventory 8,925 1,743,878 - 97,507 - 4,510 1,854,820 - Total Current Assets 30,005,636 3,672,749 2,177,889 331,631 1,082,678 4,296,253 41,566,836 2,046,568 Noncurrent Assets: Net Capital Assets 100,750,068 1,703,575 1,835,843 12,000,501 8,073,676 8,092,030 132,455,693 - Total Assets 130,755,704 5,376,324 4,013,732 12,332,132 9,156,354 12,388,283 174,022,529 2,046,568 DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES OPEB Deferred Outflows 2,661 4,259 - 2,651 1,597 3,193 14,361 - Pension Deferred Outflows 97,343 97,343 - 55,624 41,718 111,248 403,276 - Total Deferred Outflows of Resources 100,004 101,602 - 58,275 43,315 114,441 417,637 - LIABILITIES Current Liabilities: Accounts Payable 531,042 277,960 386 45,053 105,909 69,068 1,029,418 7,224 Salaries Payable 59,000 28,951 49 31,166 33,599 59,222 211,987 - Accrued Interest Payable 538,502 - 11,500 127,399 35,072 - 712,473 - Contracts Payable 286,231 - - 63,984 - - 350,215 - Due to Other Governments 9,095 146,009 491 7,951 8,827 15,208 187,581 947 Unearned Revenue - 52,146 - 156,460 18,832 50,429 277,867 - Compensated Absences Payable 57,725 73,294 - 58,802 17,605 55,344 262,771 - Bonds Payable - Current 4,580,000 - 75,000 540,000 261,000 - 5,456,000 - Total Current Liabilities 6,061,595 578,360 87,426 1,030,815 480,844 249,271 8,488,312 8,171 Noncurrent Liabilities: Total OPEB Liability 73,676 67,714 - 67,620 34,211 64,695 307,916 - Net Pension Liability 1,042,617 1,042,617 - 595,781 446,836 1,191,563 4,319,414 - Compensated Absences Payable 86,588 109,942 - 88,204 26,408 83,016 394,157 - Bonds Payable, Net of Unamortized Discounts and Premiums 33,191,241 - 693,111 8,911,194 3,401,349 - 46,196,895 - Total Noncurrent Liabilities 34,394,122 1,220,273 693,111 9,662,799 3,908,804 1,339,274 51,218,382 - Total Liabilities 40,455,717 1,798,633 780,537 10,693,614 4,389,648 1,588,545 59,706,694 8,171 DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES OPEB Deferred Inflows 2,000 3,201 - 2,400 1,200 2,401 11,202 - Pension Deferred Inflows 208,595 208,595 - 119,197 89,398 238,395 864,180 - Total Deferred Inflows of Resources 210,595 211,796 - 121,597 90,598 240,796 875,382 - NET POSITION Net Investment in Capital Assets 62,692,596 1,703,575 1,067,732 2,485,323 4,411,327 8,092,030 80,452,583 - Restricted for Debt Service - - 1,360,336 - - - 1,360,336 - Unrestricted 27,496,800 1,763,922 805,127 (910,127) 308,096 2,581,353 32,045,171 2,038,397 Total Net Position 90,189,396$ 3,467,497$ 3,233,195$ 1,575,196$ 4,719,423$ 10,673,383$ 113,858,090$ 2,038,397$ Business-Type Activities - Enterprise Funds CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND CHANGES IN FUND NET POSITION PROPRIETARY FUNDS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements. (30) Governmental Activities Risk Nonmajor Total Management Aquatic Golf Enterprise Enterprise Internal Utilities Liquor Center Course Arena Funds Funds Service Fund OPERATING REVENUES Sales - Liquor -$ 12,880,335$ -$ 18$ -$ -$ 12,880,353$ -$ Sales - Retail - 214,072 4,882 237,184 60,163 35,159 551,460 - Sales - Utilities 21,209,823 - - - - - 21,209,823 - Sales - Concessions - - 122,744 11,381 298,485 154,210 586,820 - Memberships - - 406,377 132,899 - 132,102 671,378 - Admissions - - 399,359 514,506 95,822 736,303 1,745,990 - Building Rental - - 62,478 113,777 1,891,488 856,518 2,924,261 - Rental of Equipment - - - 351,349 7,030 165,419 523,798 - Greens Fees - - - 1,437,957 - 227,081 1,665,038 - Other Fees 636,416 - 938 596,744 163,127 927,102 2,324,327 902,952 Total Operating Revenues 21,846,239 13,094,407 996,778 3,395,815 2,516,115 3,233,894 45,083,248 902,952 OPERATING EXPENSES Cost of Sales and Services - 9,124,351 48,174 181,708 106,194 90,149 9,550,576 - Personal Services 2,412,437 1,727,094 383,262 1,604,764 964,080 2,139,484 9,231,121 63,082 Contractual Services 8,942,387 652,419 136,843 537,141 941,360 787,955 11,998,105 275,493 Commodities 917,209 58,580 78,600 459,697 100,111 369,329 1,983,526 - Central Services 783,111 283,728 33,757 144,845 95,902 204,233 1,545,576 - Depreciation 5,402,610 103,685 277,330 756,156 666,629 695,623 7,902,033 - Total Operating Expenses 18,457,754 11,949,857 957,966 3,684,311 2,874,276 4,286,773 42,210,937 338,575 OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)3,388,485 1,144,550 38,812 (288,496) (358,161) (1,052,879) 2,872,311 564,377 NONOPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES) Intergovernmental 692,281 - - - - - 692,281 - Investment Income 729,873 65,244 76,656 32,721 14,544 145,904 1,064,942 47,425 Donations - - 10,700 - - 28,425 39,125 - Interest and Fiscal Charges (1,082,352) - (27,833) (307,242) (85,174) - (1,502,601) - Amortization of Bond Premiums (Discounts)260,657 - 6,423 (17,544) (23,224) - 226,312 - Gain (Loss) on Sale of Capital Assets (23,763) (21,129) - - - - (44,892) - Miscellaneous 29,416 2,060 200 800 514 8,874 41,864 - Total Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses)606,112 46,175 66,146 (291,265) (93,340) 183,203 517,031 47,425 INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE CONTRIBUTIONS AND TRANSFERS 3,994,597 1,190,725 104,958 (579,761) (451,501) (869,676) 3,389,342 611,802 CONTRIBUTIONS AND TRANSFERS Capital Contributions from Other Funds - - - - 91,270 - 91,270 - Transfers In - 2,290 10,865 65,821 326,873 556,029 961,878 - Transfers Out (361,500) (850,000) - - - - (1,211,500) - Total Contributions and Transfers (361,500) (847,710) 10,865 65,821 418,143 556,029 (158,352) - CHANGE IN NET POSITION 3,633,097 343,015 115,823 (513,940) (33,358) (313,647) 3,230,990 611,802 Net Position - January 1 86,556,299 3,124,482 3,117,372 2,089,136 4,752,781 10,987,030 110,627,100 1,426,595 NET POSITION - DECEMBER 31 90,189,396$ 3,467,497$ 3,233,195$ 1,575,196$ 4,719,423$ 10,673,383$ 113,858,090$ 2,038,397$ Business-Type Activities - Enterprise Funds CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS PROPRIETARY FUNDS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements. (31) Governmental Activities Risk Nonmajor Total Management Aquatic Golf Enterprise Enterprise Internal Utilities Liquor Center Course Arena Funds Funds Service Fund CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES Receipts from Customers and Users 21,468,768$ 13,139,889$ 997,008$ 3,412,684$ 2,538,632$ 3,121,988$ 44,678,969$ 1,201,137$ Payment to Suppliers (10,278,510) (10,202,570) (301,001) (1,655,344) (1,206,999) (1,475,650) (25,120,074) (236,003) Payment to Employees (2,357,257) (1,775,838) (383,213) (1,605,754) (943,505) (2,093,806) (9,159,373) (63,082) Net Cash Provided (Used) by Operating Activities 8,833,001 1,161,481 312,794 151,586 388,128 (447,468) 10,399,522 902,052 CASH FLOWS FROM NONCAPITAL FINANCING ACTIVITIES Grants and Contributions - - 10,700 - - - 10,700 - Transfer from Other Funds - 2,290 10,865 65,821 326,873 556,029 961,878 - Transfer to Other Funds (361,500) (850,000) - - - - (1,211,500) - Miscellaneous Received - - - - - 37,299 37,299 - Net cash Provided (Used) by Noncapital Financing Activities (361,500) (847,710) 21,565 65,821 326,873 593,328 (201,623) - CASH FLOWS FROM CAPITAL AND RELATED FINANCING ACTIVITIES State Grant 695,501 - - - - - 695,501 - Proceeds from Capital Debt 6,948,847 - - - - - 6,948,847 - Acquisition of Capital Assets (8,250,323) (333,526) - (311,393) - (153,244) (9,048,486) - Proceeds from Disposalsof Capital Assets 7,369 - - - - - 7,369 - Principal Paid on Bonds (5,685,000) - (70,000) (525,000) (254,000) - (6,534,000) - Interest and Fiscal Charges Paid on Bonds (999,754) - (29,000) (314,659) (87,075) - (1,430,488) - Net Cash Provided (Used) by Capital and Related Financing Activities (7,283,360) (333,526) (99,000) (1,151,052) (341,075) (153,244) (9,361,257) - CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES Interest Received 731,957 64,962 76,404 33,620 13,195 146,822 1,066,960 45,732 NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND INVESTMENTS 1,920,098 45,207 311,763 (900,025) 387,121 139,438 1,903,602 947,784 Cash and Investments - January 1 21,608,052 1,831,723 1,858,955 1,101,411 455,836 4,030,999 30,886,976 913,556 CASH AND INVESTMENTS - DECEMBER 31 23,528,150$ 1,876,930$ 2,170,718$ 201,386$ 842,957$ 4,170,437$ 32,790,578$ 1,861,340$ Business-Type Activities - Enterprise Funds CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED) PROPRIETARY FUNDS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements. (32) Governmental Activities Risk Nonmajor Total Management Aquatic Golf Enterprise Enterprise Internal Utilities Liquor Center Course Arena Funds Funds Service Fund RECONCILIATION OF OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) TO NET CASH PROVIDED (USED) BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES Operating Income (Loss) 3,388,485$ 1,144,550$ 38,812$ (288,496)$ (358,161)$ (1,052,879)$ 2,872,311$ 564,377$ Adjustments to Reconcile Operating Income (Loss) to Net Cash Flows Provided (Used) byOperating Activities: Depreciation 5,402,610 103,685 277,330 756,156 666,629 695,623 7,902,033 - Miscellaneous Income 29,416 2,060 200 800 514 - 32,990 - (Increase) Decrease in: Accounts Receivable (372,799) 5,544 30 (27,514) 11,542 (79,386) (462,583) 309,972 Special Assessments Receivable (34,088) - - - - - (34,088) - Due from Other Governments - - - - - - - (11,787) Inventory 7,361 705 - (29,893) - 2,659 (19,168) - Prepaid Expenses 17,641 (39,085) - - - - (21,444) 148,757 Deferred Outflows of Resources 111,605 111,634 - 63,806 47,839 127,552 462,436 - Increase (Decrease) in: Accounts Payable 340,040 (42,236) (4,030) (304,856) 35,099 (23,414) 603 (108,254) Salaries Payable 13,980 (16,638) 49 3,557 5,897 9,436 16,281 - Due to Other Governments (845) (2,876) 403 2,796 1,469 (3,229) (2,282) (1,013) Unearned Revenue - 37,878 - 43,583 10,461 (32,520) 59,402 - Total OPEB Liability 1,345 2,153 - 1,615 807 1,615 7,535 - Net Pension Liability 2,277 2,277 - 1,301 976 2,603 9,434 - Compensated Absences 11,257 (64,087) - (23,793) 1,263 1,823 (73,537) - Deferred Inflows of Resources (85,284) (84,083) - (47,476) (36,207) (97,351) (350,401) - Total Adjustments 5,444,516 16,931 273,982 440,082 746,289 605,411 7,527,211 337,675 Net Cash Provided (Used) by Operating Activities 8,833,001$ 1,161,481$ 312,794$ 151,586$ 388,128$ (447,468)$ 10,399,522$ 902,052$ NONCASH INVESTING ACTIVITIES Increase (Decrease) in Fair Value of Investments (217,978)$ (21,164)$ (24,940)$ (8,423)$ (3,517)$ (48,774)$ (324,796)$ (13,994)$ NONCASH CAPITAL AND RELATED FINANCING ACTIVITIES Acquisition of Capital Assets with Contracts Payable (108,046)$ 14,212$ -$ 165,289$ -$ -$ 71,455$ -$ Capital Assets Contributed from Other Funds -$ 2,290$ -$ -$ 91,270$ -$ 93,560$ -$ Business-Type Activities - Enterprise Funds CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF FIDUCIARY NET POSITION AGENCY FUNDS DECEMBER 31, 2019 See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements. (33) Agency Funds Cash and Investments 754,783$ Due from Other Governmental Units 78,361 Total Assets 833,144$ Accounts Payable 248,510$ Salaries Payable 10,670 Due to Other Governmental Units 573,964 Total Liabilities 833,144$ ASSETS LIABILITIES CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (34) NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES The City of Edina (the City) was incorporated in 1888 and operates under the State of Minnesota Statutory Plan B form of government. The governing body consists of a five- member City Council elected by voters of the City. The financial statements of the City have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (generally accepted accounting principles) as applied to governmental units by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). The following is a summary of significant accounting policies. A. Financial Reporting Entity The City’s financial reporting entity consists of (a) the primary government, (b) organizations for which the primary government is financially accountable, and (c) other organizations for which the nature and significance of their relationship with the primary government are such that exclusion would cause the reporting entity’s financial statements to be misleading or incomplete. The primary government is financially accountable for the component unit if it appoints a voting majority of the component unit’s governing body and is able to impose its will on the component unit or there is a potential for the component unit to provide specific financial benefits to, or impose specific financial burdens on, the primary government. As required by generally accepted accounting principles, the financial statements of the reporting entity include those of the City of Edina (the primary government) and its component units. The component unit discussed below is included in the City’s reporting entity because of the significance of its operational or financial relationships with the City. Component Unit In conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, the financial statements of the component unit have been included in the financial reporting entity as a blended component unit. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) is an entity legally separate from the City. However, for financial reporting purposes, the HRA is reported as if it were part of the City’s operations for two reasons. First, the HRA’s governing body is substantively the same as the governing body of the City. Specifically, the HRA board consists of five members, all of which are City Council members. Second, management of the City has operational responsibility for the HRA. Specifically, sales of bonds or other obligations of the HRA are approved by the City Council; the HRA follows the budget process for City departments in accordance with City policy; the annual HRA budget is approved by City Council; the HRA submits its plan for development and redevelopment to the City Council for approval; lastly, the administrative structure and management practices and policies of the HRA are approved by the City Council. The activity of the HRA is reported in the Special Revenue Funds. Separate financial statements are not prepared for the HRA. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (35) NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) B. Government-Wide and Fund Financial Statements The government-wide financial statements (i.e., the statement of net position and the statement of activities) report information on all of the nonfiduciary activities of the City. Governmental activities, which normally are supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues, are reported separately from business-type activities, which rely to a significant extent on fees and charges for support. The statement of activities demonstrates the degree to which the direct expenses of a given function or business-type activity are offset by program revenues. Direct expenses are those that are clearly identifiable with a specific function or business-type activity. Program revenues include 1) charges to customers or applicants who purchase, use, or directly benefit from goods, services, or privileges provided by a given function or business-type activity and 2) grants and contributions that are restricted to meeting the operational or capital requirements of a particular function or business type activity. Taxes and other items not included among program revenues are reported instead as general revenues. Separate financial statements are provided for governmental funds, proprietary funds, and fiduciary funds, even though the latter are excluded from the government-wide financial statements. Major individual governmental funds and major individual enterprise funds are reported as separate columns in the fund financial statements. Aggregated information for the remaining nonmajor governmental and enterprise funds is reported in a single column in the fund financial statements C. Measurement Focus, Basis of Accounting, and Financial Statement Presentation The government-wide financial statements are reported using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting, as are the proprietary fund and fiduciary fund financial statements. The City’s only fiduciary fund type, agency funds, are custodial in nature and do not have a measurement focus. Revenues are recorded when earned and expenses are recorded when a liability is incurred, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Property taxes are recognized as revenues in the year for which they are levied. Grants and similar items are recognized as revenue as soon as all eligibility requirements imposed by the provider have been met. Governmental fund financial statements are reported using the current financial resources measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recognized as soon as they are both measurable and available. Revenues are considered to be available when they are collectible within the current period or soon enough thereafter to pay liabilities of the current period. For this purpose, the City considers all revenues, except reimbursement grants, to be available if they are collected within 60 days of the end of the current fiscal period. Expenditures generally are recorded when a liability is incurred, as under accrual accounting. However, debt service expenditures, as well as expenditures related to compensated absences, other postemployment benefits (OPEB), net pension liabilities, and claims and judgments are recorded only when payment is due. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (36) NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) C. Measurement Focus, Basis of Accounting, and Financial Statement Presentation (Continued) Property taxes, special assessments, intergovernmental revenues, charges for services and interest associated with the current fiscal period are all considered to be susceptible to accrual and so have been recognized as revenues of the current fiscal period. Only the portion of special assessments receivable due within the current fiscal period is considered to be susceptible to accrual as revenue of the current period. All other revenue items are considered to be measurable and available only when cash is received by the City. The City reports the following major governmental funds: The general fund is the government’s primary operating fund. It accounts for all financial resources of the general government, except those required to be accounted for in another fund. The special revenue Housing and Redevelopment Authority fund is used to account for revenues from several sources (property taxes, bond proceeds, investment earnings, etc.) that are restricted for housing and redevelopment. The debt service fund accounts for the payment of principal and interest on General Obligation, Permanent Improvement Revolving, Public Project Revenue Bonds, and Edina Emerald Energy Program Bonds. The capital projects construction fund accounts for the various special assessment and state aid projects throughout the City. This fund also provides financing for capital improvements as restricted in the City’s capital improvement budget. The City reports the following major proprietary funds: The utilities fund accounts for the provision of water, sewer, and recycling services to the City’s residents. The liquor fund accounts for the operation of the City’s three liquor stores. The aquatic center fund accounts for the operation of the City’s aquatic center. The golf course fund accounts for the operation of the City’s two golf courses and a golf dome. The arena fund accounts for the operation of the City’s ice arena. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (37) NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) C. Measurement Focus, Basis of Accounting, and Financial Statement Presentation (Continued) Additionally, the City reports the following fund types: Internal service funds – the risk management internal service fund accounts for costs of insurance, safety and prevention measures, and risk management programs across all municipal departments. Internal service funds operate in a manner similar to enterprise funds; however, it provides services primarily to other departments within the City. Agency funds – the police seizure, Public Safety Training Facility, and Minnesota Task Force 1 funds account for fees collected for other government agencies, and the payroll fund accounts for payroll deductions withheld from employee paychecks but not yet sent to the appropriate party (includes federal and state taxes, health care deductions, etc.). As a general rule the effect of interfund activity has been eliminated from the government-wide financial statements. Exceptions to this general rule are transactions that would be treated as revenues, expenditures or expenses if they involved external organizations, such as buying goods and services or payments in lieu of taxes, are similarly treated when they involve other funds of the City of Edina. Elimination of these charges would distort the direct costs and program revenues reported for the various functions concerned. Amounts reported as program revenues include 1) charges to customers or applicants for goods, services, or privileges provided, 2) operating grants and contributions, and 3) capital grants and contributions, including special assessments. Internally dedicated resources are reported as general revenues rather than as program revenues. Likewise, general revenues include all taxes. Proprietary funds distinguish operating revenues and expenses from nonoperating items. Operating revenues and expenses generally result from providing services and producing and delivering goods in connection with a proprietary fund’s principal ongoing operations. The principal operating revenues of the City’s enterprise funds and internal service fund are charges to customers for sales and services. Operating expenses for the enterprise funds and internal service fund include the cost of sales and services, administrative expenses, and depreciation on capital assets. All revenues and expenses not meeting this definition are reported as nonoperating revenues and expenses. Aggregated information for the internal service fund is reported in a single column in the proprietary fund financial statements. Because the principal user of the internal services is the City’s governmental activities, the financial statements of the internal service funds are consolidated into the governmental column when presented in the government-wide financial statements. The cost of these services is reported in the appropriate functional activity. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (38) NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) C. Measurement Focus, Basis of Accounting, and Financial Statement Presentation (Continued) Depreciation expense is included in the direct expenses of each function. Interest on long-term debt is considered an indirect expense and is reported separately on the statement of activities. D. Cash and Investments Cash and Investments The cash balances of the City and its component unit are pooled and invested for the purpose of increasing earnings through investment activities. The pool’s investments are reported at fair value at year-end, except for investments in external investment pools, which are stated at amortized cost. The City has the ability and intent to hold its investments to maturity. The individual funds’ portions of the pool’s fair value are presented as “Cash and investments.” Earnings from such investments are allocated to the respective funds on the basis of applicable cash balance participation by each fund. The City provides temporary advances to funds that have insufficient cash and investment balances by means of an advance from another fund shown as interfund receivables in the advancing fund, and an interfund payable in the fund with the deficit, until adequate resources are received. These interfund balances are eliminated on the government-wide financial statements. The City categorizes its fair value measurements within the fair value hierarchy established by generally accepted accounting principles. The hierarchy is based on the valuation inputs used to measure the fair value of the asset. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets; Level 2 inputs are significant other observable inputs; Level 3 inputs are significant unobservable inputs. Debt securities classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy are valued using evaluations based on various market and industry inputs. See Note 2 for the City’s recurring fair value measurements as of the current year-end. Restricted Cash and Investments Restricted cash and investments represent bond proceeds held for specific purposes. Earnings on these investments are allocated directly to these funds. Cash Equivalents For the purposes of the statement of cash flows, the City considers all highly liquid debt instruments with an original maturity from the time of purchase by the City of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The proprietary funds’ portion in the government- wide cash and investment management pool is considered to be cash equivalent. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (39) NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) E. Receivables and Payables During the course of operations, numerous transactions occur between individual funds for goods provided or services rendered. Short-term interfund loans are classified as “due to/from other funds.” All short-term interfund receivables and payables at December 31, 2019 are planned to be eliminated in 2020. Any residual balances outstanding between the governmental activities and business-type activities are reported in the government- wide financial statements as “internal balances.” Property taxes and special assessments receivables have been reported net of estimated uncollectible accounts. Because utility bills are considered liens on property, no estimated uncollectible amounts are established. Uncollectible amounts are not material for other receivables and have not been reported. F. Revenue Recognition 1. Property Tax Revenue Recognition The City Council annually adopts a tax levy and certifies it to the County in December (levy/assessment date) of each year for collection in the following year. The County is responsible for billing and collecting all property taxes for itself, the City, the local School District, and other taxing authorities. Such taxes become a lien on January 1 and are recorded as receivables by the City at that date. Real property taxes are payable (by property owners) on May 15 and October 15 of each calendar year. Personal property taxes are payable by taxpayers on February 28 and June 30 of each year. These taxes are collected by the County and remitted to the City on or before July 7 and December 2 of the same year. Delinquent collections for November and December are received the following January. The City has no ability to enforce payment of property taxes by property owners. The County possesses this authority. Government-Wide Financial Statements The City recognizes property tax revenue in the period for which the taxes were levied. Uncollectible property taxes are not material and have not been reported. Governmental Fund Financial Statements The City recognizes property tax revenue when it becomes both measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current period. In practice, current and delinquent taxes and state credits received by the City in July, December, and January are recognized as revenue for the current year. Taxes collected by the County by December 31 (remitted to the City the following January) and taxes and credits not received at the year-end are classified as delinquent and due from County taxes receivable. The portion of delinquent taxes not collected by the City in January are fully offset by deferred inflows of resources because they are not available to finance current expenditures. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (40) NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) F. Revenue Recognition (Continued) 2. Special Assessment Revenue Recognition Special assessments are levied against benefited properties for the cost or a portion of the cost of special assessment improvement projects in accordance with state statutes. These assessments are collectible by the City over a term of years usually consistent with the term of the related bond issue. Collection of annual installments (including interest) is handled by the County Auditor in the same manner as property taxes. Property owners are allowed to (and often do) prepay future installments without interest or prepayment penalties. Once a special assessment roll is adopted, the amount attributed to each parcel is a lien upon that property until full payment is made or the amount is determined to be excessive by the City Council or court action. If special assessments are allowed to go delinquent, the property is subject to tax forfeit sale. Pursuant to state statutes, a property shall be subject to a tax forfeit sale after three years unless it is homesteaded, agricultural, or seasonal recreational land in which event the property is subject to such sale after five years. Government-Wide Financial Statements The City recognizes special assessment revenue in the period that the assessment roll was adopted by the City Council. Uncollectible special assessments are not material and have not been reported. Governmental Fund Financial Statements Revenue from special assessments is recognized by the City when it becomes measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current fiscal period. In practice, current and delinquent special assessments received by the City are recognized as revenue for the current year. Special assessments that are collected by the County by December 31 (remitted to the City the following January) and are also recognized as revenue for the current year. All remaining delinquent, deferred, and special deferred assessments receivable in governmental funds are completely offset by deferred inflows of resources. The following is a breakdown of special assessments receivable at December 31, 2019: Enterprise Funds Debt Service Construction Utilities Special Assessments Receivable: Delinquent 17,311$ 17,214$ 26,670$ Deferred 8,318,240 14,471,544 304,878 Total 8,335,551$ 14,488,758$ 331,548$ Governmental Funds CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (41) NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) G. Inventories and Prepaid Items Inventories of the proprietary funds are stated at cost and are recorded as expenses when consumed rather than when purchased. All inventories use the first-in/first-out (FIFO) method. Certain payments to vendors reflect costs applicable to future accounting periods and are recorded as prepaid items in both government-wide and fund financial statements and are recorded as expenditures or expenses when consumed. H. Capital Assets Capital assets, which include property, buildings, improvements, equipment, parks, infrastructure assets (roads, bridges, sidewalks, and similar items), and intangible assets such as easements, are reported in the applicable governmental or business-type activities columns in the government-wide financial statements. Capital assets are also reported in the proprietary fund financial statements but not in the governmental fund financial statements. Capital assets are defined by the government as assets with an initial, individual cost of more than $10,000 (amount not rounded) and an estimated useful life in excess of three years. Such assets are recorded at historical cost or estimated historical cost if purchased or constructed. Donated capital assets are recorded at estimated acquisition value at the date of donation. The costs of normal maintenance and repairs that do not add to the value of the asset or materially extend assets lives are not capitalized. Infrastructure assets include all of the City’s assets since inception. Property, plant, and equipment of the primary government are depreciated using the straight line method over the following estimated useful lives: Assets Life Golf Course 10 - 35 Years Land Improvements 15 - 50 Years Building and Structures 15 - 40 Years Furniture and Office Equipment 5 - 10 Years Vehicles and Equipment 3 - 20 Years Parks 5 - 100 Years Utility Infrastructure 20 - 50 Years Capital assets that are not depreciated include land, easements, and construction in progress. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (42) NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) I. Compensated Absences It is the City’s policy to permit employees to accumulate earned but unused vacation and sick pay benefits. All vacation pay is accrued when incurred in the government-wide and proprietary fund financial statements. A liability for these amounts is reported in governmental funds only if they have matured, for example, as a result of employee resignations and retirements. In accordance with the provisions of generally accepted accounting principles no liability is recorded for nonvesting accumulating rights to receive sick pay benefits. However, a liability is recognized in the government-wide and proprietary fund financial statements for that portion of accumulating sick leave benefits that is vested as severance pay. According to City policy, vested sick leave benefits are liquidated into a health care savings plan upon separation. J. State-Wide Pension Plans For purposes of measuring the net pension liability, deferred outflows/inflows of resources, and pension expense, information about the fiduciary net position of the Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) and additions to/deductions from the PERA’s fiduciary net position have been determined on the same basis as they are reported by the PERA except that the PERA’s fiscal year-end is June 30. For this purpose, plan contributions are recognized as of employer payroll paid dates and benefit payments and refunds are recognized when due and payable in accordance with the benefit terms. Investments are reported at fair value. Pension liabilities are liquidated by various governmental funds based on where the corresponding employees’ salaries are allocated. K. Long-Term Obligations In the government-wide financial statements and proprietary fund types in the fund financial statements, long-term debt and other long-term obligations are reported as liabilities in the applicable governmental activities, business-type activities, or proprietary fund type statement of net position. Bond premiums and discounts are deferred and amortized over the life of the bond using the straight-line method. Bonds payable are reported net of the applicable bond premium or discount. In the fund financial statements, governmental fund types recognize bond premiums and discounts, as well as bond issuance costs, during the current period. The face amount of debt issued plus any premium received is reported as other financing sources. Discounts on debt issuances are reported as other financing uses. Issuance costs, whether or not withheld from the actual debt proceeds received, are reported as debt service expenditures. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (43) NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) L. Deferred Outflows/Inflows of Resources In addition to assets, the statement of financial position will sometimes report a separate section for deferred outflows of resources. This separate financial statement element, deferred outflows of resources, represents a consumption of net position that applies to a future period(s) and so will not be recognized as an outflow of resources (expense/expenditure) until then. The City has one item which qualifies for reporting in this category. Deferred outflows of resources related to pensions and OPEB are reported in the government-wide and enterprise funds statement of net position. These deferred outflows result from differences between expected and actual experience, changes of assumptions, differences between projected and actual investment earnings, changes in proportion, and contributions to the plan subsequent to the measurement date and before the end of the reporting period. These amounts are deferred and amortized as required under pension and OPEB standards. In addition to liabilities, statements of financial position or balance sheets will sometimes report a separate section for deferred inflows of resources. This separate financial statement element represents an acquisition of net position that applies to future periods and so will not be recognized as an inflow of resources (revenue) until that time. The City has three items which qualify for reporting in this category. Unavailable revenue is reported only in the governmental funds balance sheet. The governmental funds report unavailable revenue from three sources: property taxes, special assessments and municipal construction aid. These amounts are deferred and recognized as an inflow of resources in the period the amounts become available. Deferred inflows of resources related to pensions and OPEB are reported in the government-wide and enterprise fund statement of net position. These deferred inflows result from differences between expected and actual experience, changes of assumptions, and the difference between projected and actual investment earnings. These amounts are deferred and amortized as required under pension and OPEB standards. M. Interfund Transactions Interfund services provided and used are accounted for as revenues, expenditures, or expenses. Transactions that constitute reimbursements to a fund for expenditures/ expenses initially made from it that are properly applicable to another fund, are recorded as expenditures/expenses in the reimbursing fund and as reductions of expenditures/expenses in the fund that is reimbursed. Interfund loans are reported as an interfund loan receivable or payable which offsets the movement of cash between funds. All other interfund transactions are reported as transfers and are eliminated to the extent possible on the government-wide statements. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (44) NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) N. Fund Balance Classification In the fund financial statements, governmental funds report fund balance in classifications that disclose constraints for which amounts in those funds can be spent. These classifications are as follows: Nonspendable – Consists of amounts that are not in spendable form, such as prepaid items, inventory, and other long-term assets. Restricted – Consists of amounts related to externally imposed constraints established by creditors, grantors, or contributors; or constraints imposed by state statutory provisions. Committed – Consists of internally imposed constraints that are established by resolution of the City Council. Those committed amounts cannot be used for any other purpose unless the City Council removes or changes the specified use by taking the same type of action it employed to previously commit those amounts. Assigned – Consists of internally imposed constraints. These constraints consist of amounts intended to be used by the City for specific purposes but do not meet the criteria to be classified as restricted or committed. In the general fund, assigned amounts represent intended uses established by the City Council. In the fund balance policy, authority to assign amounts for specific purposes is limited to the City Council. Unassigned – The residual classification for the general fund which also reflects negative residual amounts in other funds. When both restricted and unrestricted resources are available for use, it is the City’s policy to first use restricted resources, and then use unrestricted resources as they are needed. When committed, assigned, or unassigned resources are available for use, it is the City’s policy to use resources in the following order: 1) committed, 2) assigned, and 3) unassigned. O. Net Position In the government-wide and proprietary fund financial statements, net position represents the difference between assets, deferred outflows of resources, liabilities, and deferred inflows of resources. Net position is displayed in three components: Net Investment in Capital Assets – Consists of capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation, reduced by the outstanding balance of any long-term debt used to build or acquire the capital assets. Restricted Net Position – Consists of net position restricted when there are limitations imposed on their use through external restrictions imposed by creditors, grantors, or laws or regulations of other governments. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (45) NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) O. Net Position (Continued) Unrestricted Net Position – All other net position that do not meet the definition of “restricted” or “net investment in capital assets.” When both restricted and unrestricted resources are available for use, it is the City’s policy to first use restricted resources, and then use unrestricted resources as they are needed. P. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates that affect amounts reported in the financial statements during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from such estimates. NOTE 2 CASH AND INVESTMENTS A. Components of Cash and Investments Cash and investments at year-end consist of the following: Deposits 573,456$ Cash on hand 32,820 Investments 103,540,323 Total 104,146,599$ Cash and investments are presented in the financial statements as follows: Cash and Investments - Statement of Net Position 103,122,447$ Restricted Cash and Investments - Statement of Net Position 269,369 Cash and Investments - Statement of Fiduciary Net Position 754,783 Total 104,146,599$ The City had restricted investments of $269,369 as of December 31, 2019 that represents unspent bond proceeds to be used for construction projects and debt payments. B. Deposits In accordance with applicable Minnesota Statutes, the City maintains deposits at depository banks authorized by the City Council, including checking accounts, savings accounts, and certificates of deposit. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (46) NOTE 2 CASH AND INVESTMENTS POLICIES (CONTINUED) B. Deposits (Continued) The following is considered the most significant risk associated with deposits: Custodial Credit Risk – In the case of deposits, this is the risk that in the event of a bank failure, the City’s deposits may be lost. Minnesota Statutes require that all deposits be protected by federal deposit insurance, corporate surety bond, or collateral. The market value of collateral pledged must equal 110% of the deposits not covered by federal deposit insurance or corporate surety bonds. Authorized collateral includes treasury bills, notes, and bonds; issues of U.S. government agencies; general obligations rated “A” or better; revenue obligations rated “AA” or better; irrevocable standard letters of credit issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank; and certificates of deposit. Minnesota Statutes require that securities pledged as collateral be held in safekeeping in a restricted account at the Federal Reserve Bank or in an account at a trust department of a commercial bank or other financial institution that is not owned or controlled by the financial institution furnishing the collateral. The City’s investment policy does not contain further restrictions on the types of collateral required. At year-end, the carrying amount of the City’s deposits was $573,456 while the balance on the bank records was $462,541. At December 31, 2019, all of the City’s deposits were properly collateralized in accordance with state statutes. C. Investments The City has the following investments at year-end: Fair Value Measurements Investment Rating Agency Using < 1 1 to 5 6 to 10 > 10 Total U.S. Treasuries N/A N/A Level 1 1,224,660$ 5,458,882$ 3,402,017$ 21,260$ 10,106,819$ Negotiable CDs N/R N/R Level 2 7,414,619 9,279,302 - - 16,693,921 SBA Notes AA+ S&P Level 1 114,245 - - - 114,245 FHLB AA+ S&P Level 2 639,157 888,936 151,853 - 1,679,946 FHLMC AA+ S&P Level 2 725,090 74,447 34,573 708,906 1,543,016 FNMA AA+ S&P Level 2 574,764 364,922 100,347 10,582,142 11,622,175 FFCB AA+ S&P Level 2 1,649,863 538,668 18,399 - 2,206,930 Municipal Bonds AA- to AAA S&P Level 2 6,358,984 9,258,254 1,354,899 506,310 17,478,447 Short-Term Corporate A1+ S&P Level 2 1,733,040 - - - 1,733,040 Commercial Paper N/R to A1 S&P Level 2 3,808,007 - - - 3,808,007 Subtotal 24,242,429$ 25,863,411$ 5,062,088$ 11,818,618$ Money Market*33,646,825 4M Fund*2,906,952 Total investments 103,540,323$ N/A - Not Applicable N/R - Not Rated * - The City's money market investments do not have maturities Credit Risk Interest Risk - Maturity Duration in Years CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (47) NOTE 2 CASH AND INVESTMENTS POLICIES (CONTINUED) C. Investments (Continued) The Minnesota Municipal Money Market Fund (4M Fund) is regulated by Minnesota Statutes and the board of directors of the League of Minnesota Cities. The 4M Fund is an external investment pool not registered with the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) that follows the same regulatory rules of the SEC. The City’s investment in the 4M Fund is measured at amortized cost which approximates fair value. The fair value of its position in the pool is the same as the value of the pool shares. The fund does not have any limitations or restrictions on participant withdrawals. Investments are subject to various risks, the following of which are considered the most significant: Custodial Credit Risk – For investments, this is the risk that in the event of a failure of the counterparty to an investment transaction (typically a broker-dealer) the City would not be able to recover the value of its investments or collateral securities that are in the possession of an outside party. The City’s investment policy specifically addresses custodial credit risk, requiring the City to limit its exposure by purchasing insured or registered investments, or by the control of who holds the securities. Credit Risk – This is the risk that an issuer or other counterparty to an investment will not fulfill its obligations. Minnesota Statutes limit the City’s investments to direct obligations or obligations guaranteed by the United States or its agencies; shares of investment companies registered under the Federal Investment Company Act of 1940 that receive the highest credit rating, are rated in one of the two highest rating categories by a statistical rating agency, and all of the investments have a final maturity of thirteen months or less; general obligations rated “AA” or better; general obligations of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency rated “A” or better; bankers’ acceptances of United States banks eligible for purchase by the Federal Reserve System; commercial paper issued by United States corporations or their Canadian subsidiaries, rated of the highest quality category by at least two nationally recognized rating agencies, and maturing in 270 days or less; Guaranteed Investment Contracts guaranteed by a United States commercial bank, domestic branch of a foreign bank, or a United States insurance company, and with a credit quality in one of the top two highest categories; repurchase or reverse repurchase agreements and securities lending agreements with financial institutions qualified as a “depository” by the government entity, with banks that are members of the Federal Reserve System with capitalization exceeding $10,000,000, that are a primary reporting dealer in U.S. government securities to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, or certain Minnesota securities broker-dealers. The City’s investment policies specifically address credit risk, further limiting the City’s exposure to credit risk by requiring that all state and local government obligations to be rated “AA” or better by a national rating agency. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (48) NOTE 2 CASH AND INVESTMENTS POLICIES (CONTINUED) C. Investments (Continued) Concentration Risk – This is the risk associated with investing a significant portion of the City’s investment (considered 5% or more) in the securities of a single issuer, excluding U.S. guaranteed investments (such as Treasuries), investment pools, and mutual funds. The City’s investment policies specifically address the City’s desire to limit concentration risk, but do not set specific guidelines for measurement of this risk. At year-end, the City’s investments include 11.22% in securities issued by FNMA. Interest Rate Risk – This is the risk of potential variability in the fair value of fixed rate investment resulting in changes in interest rates (the longer the period for which an interest rate is fixed, the greater the risk). The City’s investment policies specifically address the City’s desire to limit interest rate risk, but do not set specific guidelines for measurement of this risk. NOTE 3 CAPITAL ASSETS Capital asset activity for the year ended December 31, 2019 is as follows: Beginning Ending Balance Increases Decreases Transfers Balance Governmental Activities: Capital Assets Not Being Depreciated: Land 21,221,675$ 2,893,443$ -$ -$ 24,115,118$ Easements 253,000 - - - 253,000 Construction in Progress 16,039,275 8,799,100 (16,509,618) - 8,328,757 Total Capital Assets Not Being Depreciated 37,513,950 11,692,543 (16,509,618) - 32,696,875 Capital Assets Being Depreciated: Land Improvements 25,432,458 134,935 - - 25,567,393 Buildings and Structures 64,071,532 164,294 - (25,785) 64,210,041 Furniture and Office Equipment 4,348,128 90,404 (501,011) - 3,937,521 Vehicles and Equipment 16,994,802 3,974,141 (1,725,424) (65,485) 19,178,034 Infrastructure 137,208,997 15,897,743 (872,939) - 152,233,801 Parks 22,541,870 283,100 (64,529) - 22,760,441 Total Capital Assets Being Depreciated 270,597,787 20,544,617 (3,163,903) (91,270) 287,887,231 Less Accumulated Depreciation for: Land Improvements (18,908,921) (754,994) - - (19,663,915) Buildings and Structures (25,598,112) (1,764,935) - - (27,363,047) Furniture and Office Equipment (3,849,031) (191,592) 487,286 - (3,553,337) Vehicles and Equipment (11,384,629) (1,331,777) 1,435,397 - (11,281,009) Infrastructure (63,874,191) (4,749,721) 412,959 - (68,210,953) Parks (12,535,609) (994,122) 64,529 - (13,465,202) Total Accumulated Depreciation (136,150,493) (9,787,141) 2,400,171 - (143,537,463) Total Capital Assets Being Depreciated, Net 134,447,294 10,757,476 (763,732) (91,270) 144,349,768 Governmental Activities Capital Assets, Net 171,961,244$ 22,450,019$ (17,273,350)$ (91,270)$ 177,046,643$ CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (49) NOTE 3 CAPITAL ASSETS (CONTINUED) Beginning Ending Balance Increases Decreases Transfers Balance Business-Type Activities: Capital Assets Not Being Depreciated: Land 285,341$ -$ -$ -$ 285,341$ Easements 35,600 - - - 35,600 Construction in Progress 13,447,342 8,366,670 (13,404,742) - 8,409,270 Total Capital Assets Not Being Depreciated 13,768,283 8,366,670 (13,404,742) - 8,730,211 Capital Assets Being Depreciated: Land Improvements and Golf Course 8,585,239 6,924,667 - - 15,509,906 Buildings and Structures 39,020,361 121,121 (82,307) 25,785 39,084,960 Furniture and Office Equipment 140,448 - - - 140,448 Vehicles and Equipment 13,054,406 496,906 (171,266) 65,485 13,445,531 Utility Infrastructure 143,680,687 6,543,863 (211,288) - 150,013,262 Lease Property Capital Lease 430,614 - - - 430,614 Total Capital Assets Being Depreciated 204,911,755 14,086,557 (464,861) 91,270 218,624,721 Less Accumulated Depreciation for: Land Improvements and Golf Course (4,152,909) (563,837) - - (4,716,746) Buildings and Structures (18,525,009) (1,613,896) 82,307 - (20,056,598) Furniture and Office Equipment (139,680) (767) - - (140,447) Vehicles and Equipment (6,969,392) (793,688) 150,137 - (7,612,943) Utility infrastructure (57,192,202) (4,929,846) 180,155 - (61,941,893) Lease Property Capital Lease (430,614) - - - (430,614) Total Accumulated Depreciation (87,409,806) (7,902,034) 412,599 - (94,899,241) Total Capital Assets Being Depreciated, Net 117,501,949 6,184,523 (52,262) 91,270 123,725,480 Business-Type Activities Capital Assets, Net 131,270,232$ 14,551,193$ (13,457,004)$ 91,270$ 132,455,691$ Depreciation expense was charged to functions/programs of the primary government as follows: Governmental Activities: General Government 492,011$ Public Safety 1,039,974 Public Works 6,050,815 Parks 2,204,341 Total Depreciation Expense - Governmental Activities 9,787,141$ Business-Type Activities: Utilities 5,402,609$ Liquor 103,684 Aquatic Center 277,333 Golf Course 756,156 Arena 666,629 Art Center 5,890 Edinborough Park 140,202 Centennial Lakes 36,681 Sports Dome 512,850 Total Depreciation Expense - Business-Type Activities 7,902,034$ CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (50) NOTE 3 CAPITAL ASSETS (CONTINUED) Construction Commitments At December 31, 2019, the City had construction project contracts in progress. The commitments related to the remaining contract balances are summarized as follows: Contract Remaining Project # Project Description Amount Commitment 19-10 Eng Bredesen Park E 308,200$ 13,068$ 19-9 Eng Valley View Rd Ped Bridge 217,117 14,099 18-4 Eng Normandale Park D Neighborhood 2,353,951 50,858 18-1 Pk Centennial Lakes Bridges 1,073,860 138,610 NA MSA Maintenance Projects 19,828 1,983 NA Arden Park Shelter and Improvements 1,057,575 35,535 19-3 Eng Indian Trails B/C 2,057,182 7,220 NA West 70th St - Retaining Wall 393,865 84,904 19-7 Eng Minnehaha Trunk Sewer Rehab 1,601,011 292,438 19-9 Eng Yorktown Park Sanitary Sewer Trunk Pipe Extension 945,947 908,253 NA Sunnyslope Shoreline Stabilization 91,666 17,539 Total 1,564,507$ NOTE 4 LONG-TERM DEBT The City has four types of bonded debt outstanding at December 31, 2019: general obligation bonds, permanent improvement revolving bonds, public project revenue bonds, and G.O. revenue bonds. The first type is payable from general property taxes. The second type is payable solely from special assessments with any deficiency to be provided for by general property taxes. The third type is payable solely from annual appropriation lease payments received from the City of Edina pursuant to a lease between the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority and the City. The fourth type is payable solely from special assessments. The fifth type is payable primarily from enterprise revenue with any deficiency to be provided for by general property taxes. The reporting entity’s long-term debt is segregated between the amounts to be repaid from governmental activities and amounts to be repaid from business-type activities. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (51) NOTE 4 LONG-TERM DEBT (CONTINUED) Governmental Activities As of December 31, 2019, the governmental long-term bonded debt of the financial reporting entity consisted of the following: Final Interest Issue Maturity Original Payable Rates Date Date Issue 12/31/2019 General Obligation Bonds: General Obligation - Capital Improvement Plan, 2010A 2.00-4.00% 11/18/2010 2/1/2021 8,285,000$ 1,755,000$ General Obligation - Capital Improvement Plan, 2013A - Refunding 3.00-3.50% 10/10/2013 2/1/2030 5,710,000 3,965,000 General Obligation - 2016A - Refunding 2.00-3.00% 7/6/2016 2/1/2028 3,635,000 3,055,000 General Obligation - 2017C - Refunding 2.05-400% 12/14/2017 2/1/2029 8,955,000 8,325,000 General Obligation Equipment Certificate - 2019A 3.00-5.00% 6/13/2019 2/1/2036 2,805,000 2,805,000 Total General Obligation Bonds 29,390,000 19,905,000 Permanent Improvement Revolving (PIR) Bonds: Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2010B 2.00-3.00% 11/18/2010 2/1/2022 2,305,000 745,000 Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2011A 2.00-3.00% 10/27/2011 2/1/2023 3,320,000 1,420,000 Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2012A 3.00-4.00% 11/15/2012 2/1/2029 2,675,000 1,925,000 Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2013A 3.00-3.50% 10/10/2013 2/1/2030 2,555,000 1,980,000 Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2014B - Refunding 2.00-3.00% 12/11/2014 2/1/2020 4,075,000 880,000 Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2015A 2.00-4.00% 7/9/2015 2/1/2032 6,545,000 5,825,000 Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2015A - Parking 2.00-4.00% 7/9/2015 2/1/2036 2,495,000 2,205,000 Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2016A 2.00-3.00% 7/6/2016 2/1/2033 3,940,000 3,725,000 Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2017A 3.00-4.00% 6/29/2017 2/1/2034 1,995,000 1,995,000 Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2018A 3.00-4.00% 6/27/2018 2/1/2035 2,210,000 2,210,000 Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2019A 3.00-4.00% 6/13/2019 2/1/2036 2,195,000 2,195,000 Total PIR Bonds 36,300,000 25,105,000 Public Project Revenue Bonds: Public Project Revenue, Series 2009A 2.10-4.55% 11/24/2009 2/1/2030 2,595,000 1,395,000 Public Project Revenue, Series 2014A 2.00-3.625% 7/15/2014 2/1/2035 16,155,000 13,615,000 Public Project Revenue, Series 2015A - Refunding 2.50-3.00% 7/9/2015 5/1/2026 3,490,000 2,350,000 Total Public Project Revenue Bonds 22,240,000 17,360,000 Total Bonded Indebtedness - Governmental Activities 87,930,000$ 62,370,000$ CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (52) NOTE 4 LONG-TERM DEBT (CONTINUED) Business-Type Activities Final Interest Issue Maturity Original Payable Rates Date Date Issue 12/31/2019 Revenue Bonds: Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2012B 0.45-1.60% 11/15/2012 2/1/2020 815,000$ 75,000$ Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2012C 2.00-3.00% 11/15/2012 2/1/2033 2,100,000 2,100,000 Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2013B 3.00-3.45% 10/10/2013 2/1/2029 1,125,000 810,000 Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2015B 2.00-325% 7/9/2015 2/1/2031 2,140,000 1,775,000 Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2017B 3.00-4.00% 6/29/2017 2/1/2033 7,425,000 6,945,000 Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2017D - Refunding 2.00% 12/20/2017 2/1/2030 1,640,000 1,459,000 Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2011A 2.00-3.00% 10/27/2011 2/1/2022 11,230,000 3,655,000 Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2012A 3.00-4.00% 11/15/2012 2/1/2023 6,100,000 2,725,000 Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2014A 2.00-3.00% 7/15/2014 2/1/2024 5,680,000 2,970,000 Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2015A 2.00-4.00% 7/9/2015 2/1/2025 5,235,000 3,255,000 Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2016A 2.00-3.00% 7/6/2016 2/1/2027 8,775,000 7,215,000 Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2017A 3.00-4.00% 6/29/2017 2/1/2028 6,595,000 6,045,000 Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2018A 3.00-4.00% 6/27/2018 2/1/2029 3,305,000 3,305,000 Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2019A 3.00-4.00% 6/13/2019 2/1/2036 5,815,000 5,815,000 Total Bonded Indebtedness - Business- Type Activities 73,690,000$ 48,149,000$ Annual debt service requirements to maturity for the City’s bonds are as follows: Year Ending December 31,Principal Interest Principal Interest Principal Interest 2020 2,180,000$ 669,125$ 2,570,000$ 771,215$ 1,115,000$ 540,690$ 2021 2,505,000 561,700 1,865,000 701,569 1,145,000 505,649 2022 1,670,000 482,000 2,020,000 641,119 1,185,000 472,949 2023 1,735,000 419,050 1,830,000 575,731 1,220,000 438,951 2024 1,800,000 353,550 1,515,000 517,544 1,255,000 400,171 2025-2029 9,600,000 799,077 8,295,000 1,814,113 5,535,000 1,438,975 2030-2034 415,000 7,263 6,125,000 561,478 4,835,000 630,935 2035-2036 - - 885,000 26,701 1,070,000 19,394 Total 19,905,000$ 3,291,765$ 25,105,000$ 5,609,470$ 17,360,000$ 4,447,714$ Governmental Activities General Obligation Bonds Public Improvement Revolving Bonds Public Project Revenue Bonds Year Ending December 31,Principal Interest 2020 5,456,000$ 1,574,482$ 2021 6,079,000 1,356,135 2022 6,261,000 1,155,895 2023 5,184,000 963,055 2024 4,622,000 791,399 2025-2029 16,595,000 1,960,831 2030-2036 3,952,000 201,542 Total 48,149,000$ 8,003,339$ Business-Type Activities Revenue Bonds CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (53) NOTE 4 LONG-TERM DEBT (CONTINUED) Change in Long-Term Liabilities Long-term liability activity for the year ended December 31, 2019 was as follows: Beginning Ending Due Within Balance Additions Reductions Balance One Year Governmental Activities: Bonds Payable: General Obligation 19,155,000$ 2,805,000$ (2,055,000)$ 19,905,000$ 2,180,000$ PIR 25,540,000 2,195,000 (2,630,000) 25,105,000 2,570,000 Public Project Revenue 18,440,000 - (1,080,000) 17,360,000 1,115,000 EEEP Revenue 13,476 - (13,476) - - Less Deferred Amounts: Discounts on Bonds (385,961) - 385,961 - - Premiums on Bonds 2,214,801 799,080 (355,280) 2,658,601 - Total Bonds Payable 64,977,316 5,799,080 (5,747,795) 65,028,601 5,865,000 Loans Payable - 750,000 - 750,000 - Compensated Absences 4,110,969 1,932,232 (2,057,156) 3,986,045 1,594,418 Governmental Activity Long-Term Liabilities 69,088,285$ 8,481,312$ (7,804,951)$ 69,764,646$ 7,459,418$ Business-Type Activities: Bonds Payable: Revenue Bonds 48,868,000$ 5,815,000$ (6,534,000)$ 48,149,000$ 5,456,000$ Less Deferred Amounts: Discounts on Bonds (204,462) - 204,462 - - Premiums on Bonds 2,800,822 1,133,847 (430,774) 3,503,895 - Total Bonds Payable 51,464,360 6,948,847 (6,760,312) 51,652,895 5,456,000 Compensated Absences 730,465 205,094 (278,631) 656,928 262,771 Business-Type Activity Long-Term Liabilities 52,194,825$ 7,153,941$ (7,038,943)$ 52,309,823$ 5,718,771$ For governmental activities, compensated absences are generally liquidated by the general fund. On June 13, 2019, the City issued $10,815,000 of General Obligation Bonds, Series 2019A. The proceeds of these bonds are being used to finance construction of various public street improvement projects, the construction of various utility system improvements, and the acquisition of public safety capital equipment. The bonds include coupon rates of 3.00- 5.00%, with a final maturity date of February 1, 2036. In October 2019, the HRA agreed to loan $1,500,000 to Edina Market Street, LLC, to assist in construction costs of a 100 unit apartment building on property located in the City. The East Edina Housing Foundation agreed to fund $750,000 of this loan via an agreement with the HRA. As a result the HRA has a loan payable to the East Edina Housing Foundation for the portion they funded. The term of the loan is 15 years with interest payments due annually and the principal due at maturity. Each year the City will remit half of the payments it receives to the Housing Foundation. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (54) NOTE 4 LONG-TERM DEBT (CONTINUED) Revenue Pledged Future revenue pledged for the payment of long-term debt is as follows: Percent of Remaining Principal Pledged Total Debt Terms of Principal and Interest Revenue Bond Issue Use of Proceeds Type Service Pledge and Interest Paid Received 2012B Recreational Facility Bonds Arena Improvements Arena 100 % 2013-2020 75,600$ 133,280$ 2,516,115$ 2012C Recreational Facility Bonds Arena Improvements Arena 100 2013-2033 2,518,122 53,794 2,516,115 2013B Recreational Facility Bonds Golf Dome Improvements Golf 100 2014-2029 948,023 97,615 3,395,815 2015B Recreational Facility Bonds Golf Course Improvements Golf 100 2016-2031 2,118,397 178,844 3,395,815 2017B Recreational Facility Bonds Golf Course Improvements Golf 100 2018-2033 7,901,950 572,100 3,395,815 2017B Recreational Facility Bonds Pool Improvements Pool 100 2018-2027 806,000 100,400 996,778 2017D Recreational Facility Bonds Arena Improvements Arena 100 2018-2030 1,624,850 154,966 2,516,115 2011A Utility Revenue Bonds Utility Infrastructure Utility 100 2012-2022 3,821,575 1,160,000 21,846,239 2012A Utility Revenue Bonds Utility Infrastructure Utility 100 2013-2023 2,891,275 736,950 21,846,239 2014A Utility Revenue Bonds Utility Infrastructure Utility 100 2014-2024 3,182,825 644,150 21,846,239 2015A Utility Revenue Bonds Utility Infrastructure Utility 100 2016-2025 3,604,100 608,700 21,846,239 2016A Utility Revenue Bonds Utility Infrastructure Utility 100 2017-2027 7,975,681 1,013,763 21,846,239 2017A Utility Revenue Bonds Utility Infrastructure Utility 100 2018-2028 7,073,150 798,500 21,846,239 2018A Utility Revenue Bonds Utility Infrastructure Utility 100 2019-2029 3,896,150 65,092 21,846,239 2019A Utility Revenue Bonds Utility Infrastructure Utility 100 2020-2036 7,714,641 - 21,846,239 Current YearRevenue Pledged NOTE 5 LEGAL DEBT MARGIN The City is subject to a statutory limitation by the state of Minnesota for bonded indebtedness payable principally from property taxes. The City of Edina’s legal debt margin for 2019 is computed as follows: 2019 Market Value (After Fiscal Disparities) 12,370,204,900$ Debt Limit (3% of Market Value) 3,711,061,470$ Amount of Debt Applicable to Debt Limit: Total Bonded Debt 110,519,000$ Less: Public Improvement Revolving Bonds (25,105,000) Revenue Bonds (48,149,000) Total Debt Applicable to Debt Limit 37,265,000$ Legal Debt Margin 3,673,796,470$ CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (55) NOTE 6 DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS – STATEWIDE The City participates in various pension plans, total pension expense for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $3,280,602. The components of pension expense are noted in the following plan summaries: A. Plan Description The City participates in the following cost-sharing multiple-employer defined benefit pension plans administered by the PERA. PERA’s defined benefit pension plans are established and administered in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 353 and 356. PERA’s defined benefit pension plans are tax qualified plans under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC). 1. General Employees Retirement Fund All full-time and certain part-time employees of the City are covered by the General Employees Plan. The General Employees Plan members belong to the Coordinated Plan. Coordinated Plan members are covered by Social Security. 2. Public Employees Police and Fire Fund The Police and Fire Plan, originally established for police officers and firefighters not covered by a local relief association, now covers all police officers and firefighters hired since 1980. Effective July 1, 1999, the Police and Fire also covers police officers and firefighters belonging to local relief associations that elected to merge with and transfer assets and administration to the PERA. B. Benefits Provided PERA provides retirement, disability, and death benefits. Benefit provisions are established by state statute and can only be modified by the state legislature. Vested, terminated employees who are entitled to benefits but are not receiving them yet, are bound by the provisions in effect at the time they last terminated their public service. 1. General Employees Plan Benefits General Employees Plan benefits are based on a member’s highest average salary for any five successive years of allowable service, age, and years of credit at termination of service. Two methods are used to compute benefits for PERA’s Coordinated Plan members. Members hired prior to July 1, 1989, receive the higher of Method 1 or Method 2 formulas. Only Method 2 is used for members hired after June 30, 1989. Under Method 1, the accrual rate for Coordinated members is 1.2% of average salary for each of the first 10 years of service and 1.7% of average salary for each additional year. Under Method 2, the accrual rate for Coordinated members is 1.7% of average salary for all years of service. For members hired prior to July 1, 1989, a full annuity is available when age plus years of service equal 90 and normal retirement age is 65. For members hired on or after July 1, 1989, normal retirement age is the age for unreduced Social Security benefits capped at 66. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (56) NOTE 6 DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS – STATEWIDE (CONTINUED) B. Benefits Provided (Continued) 1. General Employees Plan Benefits (Continued) Annuities, disability benefits, and survivor benefits are increased effective every January 1. Beginning January 1, 2019, the postretirement increase will be equal to 50 percent of the cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) announced by the SSA, with a minimum increase of at least 1 percent and a maximum of 1.5 percent. Recipients that have been receiving the annuity or benefit for at least a full year as of the June 30 before the effective date of the increase will receive the full increase. For recipients receiving the annuity or benefit for at least one month but less than a full year as of the June 30 before the effective date of the increase will receive a reduced prorated increase. For members retiring on January 1, 2024, or later, the increase will be delayed until normal retirement age (age 65 if hired prior to July 1, 1989, or age 66 for individuals hired on or after July 1, 1989). Members retiring under Rule of 90 are exempt from the delay to normal retirement. 2. Police and Fire Plan Benefits Benefits for Police and Fire Plan members first hired after June 30, 2010, but before July 1, 2014, vest on a prorated basis from 50% after five years up to 100% after 10 years of credited service. Benefits for Police and Fire Plan members first hired after June 30, 2014, vest on a prorated basis from 50% after 10 years up to 100% after 20 years of credited service. The annuity accrual rate is 3% of average salary for each year of service. A full, unreduced pension is earned when members are age 55 and vested, or for members who were first hired prior to July 1, 1989, when age plus years of service equal at least 90. Annuities, disability benefits, and survivor benefits are increased effective every January 1. Beginning January 1, 2019, the postretirement increase will be fixed at 1 percent. Recipients that have been receiving the annuity or benefit for at least 36 months as of the June 30 before the effective date of the increase will receive the full increase. For recipients receiving the annuity or benefit for at least 25 months but less than 36 months as of the June 30 before the effective date of the increase will receive a reduced prorated increase. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (57) NOTE 6 DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS – STATEWIDE (CONTINUED) C. Contributions Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 353 sets the rates for employer and employee contributions. Contribution rates can only be modified by the state legislature. 1. General Employees Fund Contributions Coordinated Plan members were required to contribute 6.5% of their annual covered salary in fiscal year 2019 and the City was required to contribute 7.5% for Coordinated Plan members. The City’s contributions to the General employees Fund for the year ended December 31, 2019 were $1,471,059. The City’s contributions were equal to the required contributions as set by state statute. 2. Police and Fire Fund Contributions Police and Fire member’s contribution rates increased from 10.8% of pay to 11.3% and employer rates increased from 16.2% to 16.95% on January 1, 2019. The City’s contributions to the Police and Fire Fund for the year ended December 31, 2019 were $1,595,304. The City’s contributions were equal to the required contributions as set by state statute. D. Pension Costs 1. General Employees Fund Pension Costs At December 31, 2019, the City reported a liability of $14,745,577 for its proportionate share of the General Employees Fund’s net pension liability. The City’s net pension liability reflected a reduction due to the state of Minnesota’s contribution of $16 million to the fund in 2019. The state of Minnesota is considered a nonemployer contribution entity and the state’s contribution meets the definition of a special funding situation. The state of Minnesota’s proportionate share of the net pension liability associated with the City totaled $462,813. The net pension liability was measured as of June 30, 2019, and the total pension liability used to calculate the net pension liability was determined by an actuarial valuation as of that date. The City’s proportion of the net pension liability was based on the City’s contributions received by the PERA during the measurement period for employer payroll paid dates from July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019, relative to the total employer contributions received from all of the PERA’s participating employers. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (58) NOTE 6 DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS – STATEWIDE (CONTINUED) D. Pension Costs (Continued) 1. General Employees Fund Pension Costs (Continued) At December 31, 2019, the City’s proportionate share was 0.2694%, which was an increase of 0.0015% from its proportion measured as of December 31, 2018. City's Proportionate Share of the Net Pension Liability 14,745,577$ State of Minnesota's Proportionate Share of the Net Pension Liability Associated with the City 462,813 Total 15,208,390$ For the year ended December 31, 2019, the City recognized pension expense of $1,842,674 for its proportionate share of the General Employees Plan’s pension expense. In addition, the City recognized an additional $34,660 as pension expense (and grant revenue) for its proportionate share of the state of Minnesota’s contribution of $16 million to the General Employees Fund. At December 31, 2019, the City reported its proportionate share of the General Employees Plan’s deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources, related to pensions from the following sources: Deferred Deferred Outflows Inflows of Resources of Resources Differences Between Expected and Actual Economic Experience 408,654$ $ Changes in Actuarial Assumptions - 1,159,012 Differences Between Projected and Actual Investment Earnings - 1,494,638 Changes in Proportion 244,363 296,486 Contributions Paid to the PERA Subsequent to the Measurement Date 723,685 Total 1,376,702$ 2,950,136$ CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (59) NOTE 6 DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS – STATEWIDE (CONTINUED) D. Pension Costs (Continued) 1. General Employees Fund Pension Costs (Continued) $723,685 reported as deferred outflows of resources related to pensions resulting from city contributions subsequent to the measurement date that will be recognized as a reduction of the net pension liability in the year ended December 31, 2020. Other amounts reported as deferred outflows and inflows of resources related to pensions will be recognized in pension expense as follows: Pension Expense Year Ended December 31,Amount 2020 (736,712)$ 2021 (1,312,074) 2022 (272,094) 2023 23,761 2. Police and Fire Fund Pension Costs At December 31, 2019, the City reported a liability of $9,026,752 for its proportionate share of the Police and Fire Fund’s net pension liability. The net pension liability was measured as of June 30, 2019, and the total pension liability used to calculate the net pension liability was determined by an actuarial valuation as of that date. The City’s proportion of the net pension liability was based on the City’s contributions received by the PERA during the measurement period for employer payroll paid dates from July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019, relative to the total employer contributions received from all of the PERA’s participating employers. At June 30, 2019, the City’s proportion was 0.8479%, which was an increase of 0.0457% from its proportion measured as of June 30, 2018. The City also recognized $114,466 for the year ended December 31, 2019, as revenue and an offsetting reduction of net pension liability for its proportionate share of the state of Minnesota’s on-behalf contributions to the Police and Fire Fund. Legislation passed in 2013 required the state of Minnesota to begin contribution $9 million to the Police and Fire Fund each year until the plan is 90% funded or until the State Patrol Plan (administered by the Minnesota State Retirement System) is 90% funded, whichever occurs later. In addition, the state will pay $4.5 million on October 1, 2018 and October 1, 2019 in direct state aid. Thereafter, by October 1 of each year, the state will pay $9 million until fully funding is reached or July 1, 2048, whoever is earlier. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the City recognized pension expense of $1,403,268 for its proportionate share of the Police and Fire Plan’s pension expenses. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (60) NOTE 6 DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS – STATEWIDE (CONTINUED) D. Pension Costs (Continued) 2. Police and Fire Plan Pension Costs (Continued) At December 31, 2019, the City reported its proportionate share of the Police and Fire Plan’s deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions from the following sources: Deferred Deferred Outflows Inflows of Resources of Resources Differences Between Expected and Actual Economic Experience 383,266$ 1,373,968$ Changes in Actuarial Assumptions 7,490,773 10,134,272 Differences Between Projected and Actual Investment Earnings 1,880,059 Changes in Proportion 766,235 143,401 Contributions Paid to the PERA Subsequent to the Measurement Date 819,837 Total 9,460,111$ 13,531,700$ $819,837 reported as deferred outflows of resources related to pensions resulting from city contributions subsequent to the measurement date will be recognized as a reduction of the net pension liability in the year ended December 31, 2020. Other amounts reported as deferred outflows and inflows of resources related to pensions will be recognized in pension expense as follows: Pension Expense Year Ended December 31,Amount 2020 (499,075)$ 2021 (1,162,888) 2022 (3,454,429) 2023 99,190 2024 125,776 E. Actuarial Assumptions The total pension liability in the December 31, 2019 actuarial valuation was determined using an individual entry age normal actuarial cost method and the following actuarial assumptions: Inflation 2.50% Per Year Active Member Payroll Growth 3.25% Per Year Investment Rate of Return 7.50% CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (61) NOTE 6 DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS – STATEWIDE (CONTINUED) E. Actuarial Assumptions (Continued) Salary increases were based on a service-related table. Mortality rates for active members, retirees, survivors, and disabilitants for all plans were based on RP 2014 tables for males or females, as appropriate, with slight adjustments to fit PERA’s experience. Cost of living benefit increases after retirement for retirees are assumed to be 1.25 percent per year for the General Employees Plan, and 1.0 percent per year for the Police and Fire Plan. Actuarial assumptions used in the June 30, 2019 valuation were based on the results of actuarial experience studies. The most recent four-year experience study in the General Employees Plan was completed in 2019. The most recent four-year experience study for Police and Fire Plan was completed in 2016. The following changes in actuarial assumptions occurred in 2019: General Employees Fund Changes in Actuarial Assumptions: • The morality projection scale was changed from MP-2017 to MP-2018. Changes in Plan Provisions: • The employer supplemental contribution was changed prospectively, decreasing from $31.0 million to $21.0 million per year. The State’s special funding contribution was changed prospectively, requiring $16.0 million due per year through 2031. Police and Fire Fund Changes in Actuarial Assumptions: • The morality projection scale was changed from MP-2017 to MP-2018. Changes in Plan Provisions: • There have been no changes since the prior valuation. The State Board of Investment, which manages the investments of the PERA, prepares an analysis of the reasonableness on a regular basis of the long-term expected rate of return using a building-block method in which best-estimate ranges of expected future rates of return are developed for each major asset class. These ranges are combined to produce an expected long-term rate of return by weighting the expected future rates of return by the target asset allocation percentages. The target allocation and best estimates of geometric real rates of return for each major asset class are summarized in the following table: CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (62) NOTE 6 DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS – STATEWIDE (CONTINUED) E. Actuarial Assumptions (Continued) Long-Term Target Expected Real Asset Class Allocation Rate of Return Domestic Stocks 35.5 % 5.10 % International 25.0 % 5.90 stocks Bonds 20.0 % 0.75 Alternative Assets 17.5 % 5.90 Cash 2.0 % - F. Discount Rate The discount rate used to measure the total pension liability in 2019 was 7.5%. The projection of cash flows used to determine the discount rate assumed that contributions from plan members and employers will be made at rates set in Minnesota Statutes. Based on those assumptions, the fiduciary net position of the General Employees Plan and Police and Fire Plan were projected to be available to make all projected future benefit payments of current plan members. Therefore, the long- term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was applied to all periods of projected benefit payments to determine the total pension liability. G. Pension Liability Sensitivity The following presents the City’s proportionate share of the net pension liability for all plans it participates in, calculated using the discount rate disclosed in the preceding paragraph, as well as what the City’s proportionate share of the net pension liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate 1.0 percentage point lower or 1.0 percentage point higher than the current discount rate: 1% Decrease in 1% Increase in Discount Rate Discount Rate Discount Rate (6.5%) (7.5%) (8.5%) The City’s Proportionate Share of the GERF Net Pension Liability 24,485,793$ 14,745,577$ 6,975,022$ The City’s Proportionate Share of the PEPFF Net Pension Liability 19,730,803$ 9,026,752$ 175$ H. Pension Plan Fiduciary Net Position Detailed information about each pension plan’s fiduciary net position is available in a separately-issued PERA financial report that includes financial statements and required supplementary information. That report may be obtained on the PERA website at www.mnpera.org. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (63) NOTE 6 DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS – STATEWIDE (CONTINUED) I. Public Employees Defined Contribution Plan (DCP) Board members of the City are covered by the DCP, a multiple-employer deferred compensation plan administered by PERA. The DCP is a tax qualified plan under Section 401(a) of the IRC and all contributions by or on behalf of employees are tax deferred until time of withdrawal. Plan benefits depend solely on amounts contributed to the plan plus investment earnings, less administrative expenses. Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 353D.03, specifies plan provisions, including the employee and employer contribution rates for those qualified personnel who elect to participate. An eligible elected official who decides to participate contributes 5.0% of salary which is matched by the elected official’s employer. For ambulance service personnel, employer contributions are determined by the employer, and for salaried employees must be a fixed percentage of salary. Employer contributions for volunteer personnel may be a unit value for each call or period of alert duty. Employees who are paid for their services may elect to make member contributions in an amount not to exceed the employer share. Employer and employee contributions are combined and used to purchase shares in one or more of the seven accounts of the Minnesota Supplemental Investment Fund. For administering the plan, PERA receives 2.0% of employer contributions and twenty-five hundredths of 1.0% (0.0025) of the assets in each member’s account annually. Total contributions made by the City during fiscal year 2019 were: Required Employee Employer Employee Employer Rate 2,413$ 2,413$ 5 % 5 % 5 % Contribution Amount Percentage of Covered Payroll NOTE 7 MULTIPLE-EMPLOYER DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN City employees belonging to International Union of Operating Engineers (IUOE) are participants in a multiple-employer defined benefit pension plan Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineers and Participating Employers (CRF) administered by the board of trustees of the Central Pension Fund. The plan is a cost-sharing pension plan that is not a state or local governmental pension plan, is used to provide defined benefit pensions both to employers that are not state or local governmental employers, and has no predominant state or local government employer. The plan issues a publicly available financial report located on their website at www.cpfiuoe.org. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (64) NOTE 7 MULTIPLE-EMPLOYER DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN (CONTINUED) The City has 54 employees who are covered by the pension plan. The plan provides benefits such as monthly retirement income, special and early retirement benefits, postretirement surviving spouse benefits, and disability benefits. The CPF is a supplemental Pension Fund authorized by Minnesota Statutes, 356.24, subdivision 1(9). The CPF Plan of Benefits and the Agreement and Declaration of Trust will serve as the governing documents. The City’s contributions to the plan are pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement with the IUOE which expires December 31, 2019. The required contribution rate is $0.75 per hour, which is applied to all compensated hours, and capped at $5,000 per year. Total employer contributions for the year ended December 31, 2019 were $85,256. With regard to withdrawal from the pension plan, the parties agree that the amount that would otherwise be paid in salary or wages will be contributed instead to the CPF as pretax employer contributions. NOTE 8 OTHER POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS (OPEB) PLAN A. Plan Description The City provides postemployment insurance benefits to certain eligible employees through its OPEB Plan, a single-employer defined benefit plan administered by the City. All postemployment benefits are based on contractual agreements with employee groups. Eligibility for these benefits is based on years of service and/or minimum age requirements. These contractual agreements do not include any specific contribution or funding requirements. The plan does not issue a publically available financial report. No plan assets are accumulated in a trust that meets the criteria in paragraph 4 of GASB Statement No. 75. B. Benefits Provided All retirees of the City upon retirement have the option under state law to continue their medical insurance coverage through the City from the time of retirement until the employee reaches the age of eligibility for Medicare. For members of all employee groups, the retiree must pay the full premium to continue coverage for medical and dental insurance. The City is legally required to include any retirees for whom it provides health insurance coverage in the same insurance pool as its active employees, whether the premiums are paid by the City or the retiree. Consequently, participating retirees are considered to receive a secondary benefit known as an “implicit rate subsidy.” This benefit relates to the assumption that the retiree is receiving a more favorable premium rate than they would otherwise be able to obtain if purchasing insurance on their own, due to being included in the same pool with the City’s younger and statistically healthier active employees. For police officers and firefighters disabled in the line-of-duty, Minnesota Statutes require the City to continue payment of the employer’s contribution toward health coverage for the police officer or firefighter and their spouse, if the spouse was covered at the time of disability, until age 65. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (65) NOTE 8 OTHER POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS (OPEB) PLAN (CONTINUED) C. Contributions The required contribution is based on projected pay-as-you-go financing requirements, with additional amounts to prefund benefits as determined periodically by the City. The City’s current year required pay-as-you-go contributions to finance the benefits described in the previous section totaled $144,000. Total OPEB liability will be paid by the general fund and enterprise funds. D. Membership Membership in the plan consisted of the following as of the latest actuarial valuation: Retirees and Beneficiaries Receiving Benefits 22 Active Plan Members 299 Total Members 321 E. Total OPEB Liability of the City The City’s total OPEB liability was determined by an actuarial valuation with a valuation date of January 1, 2018. Liabilities in this report were rolled forward to the measurement date of December 31, 2018. F. Actuarial Assumptions The total OPEB liability was determined by an actuarial valuation as of January 1, 2018, using the following actuarial assumptions, applied to all periods included in the measurement, unless otherwise specified. Discount Rate 4.09% 20-Year Municipal Bond Yield 4.09% Inflation Rate 2.75% Salary Increases 3.50% Medical Trend Rate 10.00% grading to 5.00% over 10 years The actuarial assumptions used in the latest valuation were based on those used to value pension liabilities for Minnesota city employees. The state pension plans base their assumptions on periodic experience studies. Economic assumptions are based on input from a variety of published sources of historical and projected future financial data. Each assumption was reviewed for reasonableness with the source information as well as for consistency with the other economic assumptions. Since the plan is not funded by an irrevocable trust, the discount rate is equal to the 20- year municipal bond yield rate of 4.09%, which was set by considering published rate information for 20-year high quality, tax exempt, general obligation municipal bonds as of the measurement date. The City discount rate used in the prior measurement date was 3.44%. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (66) NOTE 8 OTHER POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS (OPEB) PLAN (CONTINUED) F. Actuarial Assumptions (Continued) Mortality rates were based on the RP-2014 mortality tables adjusted for white collar and mortality improvements using projection scale MP-2015 for GERF members and MP- 2016 for PEPFF members. Future retirees electing coverage is assumed to 55%. Married future retirees electing spouse coverage is assumed to range from 40% to 60% based on classification of employee. G. Changes in the Total OPEB Liability Total OPEB Liability Beginning Balance 3,509,875$ Changes for the Year: Service Cost 296,634 Interest 128,559 Changes of Assumptions (178,824) Benefit Payments (138,732) Total Net Changes 107,637 Ending Balance 3,617,512$ Assumption changes since the prior measurement date include the following: The discount rate was changed from 3.44% to 4.09%. H. Total OPEB Liability Sensitivity to Discount and Health Care Cost Trend Rate Changes The following presents the total OPEB liability of the City, as well as what the City’s total OPEB liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate that is 1 percentage point lower or 1 percentage point higher than the current discount rate: 1% Decrease in 1% Increase in Discount Rate Discount Rate Discount Rate OPEB Discount Rate 3.09 % 4.09 % 5.09 % Total OPEB Liability 3,895,531$ 3,617,512$ 3,356,812$ CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (67) NOTE 8 OTHER POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS (OPEB) PLAN (CONTINUED) H. Total OPEB Liability Sensitivity to Discount and Health Care Cost Trend Rate Changes (Continued) The following presents the total OPEB liability of the City, as well as what the City’s total OPEB liability would be if it were calculated using healthcare cost trend rates that are 1 percentage point lower or 1 percentage point higher than the current healthcare cost trend rates: 1% Decrease in 1% Increase in Medical Trend Medical Trend Medical Trend Rate Rate Rate OPEB Medical Trend Rate 9.00% decreasing to 4.00% over 10 years 10.00% decreasing to 5.00% over 10 years 11.00% decreasing to 6.00% over 10 years Total OPEB Liability 3,199,548$ 3,617,512$ 4,112,709$ I. OPEB Expense and Related Deferred Outflows of Resources and Deferred Inflows of Resources For the current year ended, the City recognized OPEB expense of $415,567. As of year- end, the City reported deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to OPEB from the following sources: Deferred Deferred Outflows Inflows of Resources of Resources Changes of Assumptions 68,913$ 160,025$ City Contributions Subsequent to the Measurement Date 144,000 - Total 212,913$ 160,025$ A total of $144,000 reported as deferred outflows of resources related to OPEB resulting from city contributions subsequent to the measurement date will be recognized as a reduction of the total OPEB liability in the year ending December 31, 2020. Other amounts reported as deferred outflows and inflows of resources related to the plan will be recognized in pension expense as follows: OPEB Expense Year Ended December 31,Amount 2020 (9,626)$ 2021 (9,626) 2022 (9,626) 2023 (9,626) 2024 (9,626) Thereafter (42,982) CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (68) NOTE 9 RECEIVABLES, PAYABLES, AND TRANSFERS Debt Aquatic Nonmajor General Service Construction Liquor Center Golf Course Arena Enterprise Total Transfer Out: General Fund: -$ -$ 3,388,864$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,388,864$ Construction Fund - 3,100,000 - - - 19,050 - 96,822 3,215,872 Utilities Fund 115,494 - 100,000 2,290 10,865 46,771 26,873 59,207 361,500 Liquor Fund 50,000 - 100,000 - - - 300,000 400,000 850,000 Total 165,494$ 3,100,000$ 3,588,864$ 2,290$ 10,865$ 65,821$ 326,873$ 556,029$ 7,816,236$ Transfers In Interfund transfers allow the City to allocate financial resources to the funds that receive benefit from services provided by another fund. Some of the City’s interfund transfers fall under that category. Nonroutine transfers include the following: 1. The liquor fund transferred $50,000, $300,000, $200,000, and $200,000 to the general, arena, art center, and centennial lakes funds, respectively, to subsidize operations. 2. The utilities fund and liquor fund transferred $100,000 each to the construction fund to fund the capital improvement program, as planned in the 2019 budget. 3. The general fund transferred $3,388,864 of the 2018 unassigned fund balance to the construction fund to subsidize the capital improvement program. 4. The construction fund transferred $3,100,000 of PIR assessment revenue to the debt service fund for related debt payments. 5. The construction fund transferred $19,050 to the golf course fund for golf cart storage upgrades and $96,822 to the centennial lakes fund for pathways work. NOTE 10 TAX INCREMENT DISTRICTS The Housing Redevelopment Authority and City of Edina are the administering authorities for the following Tax Increment Districts: District number 1208 (Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District) is an economic development district established in 2012 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes with a termination date of 2022. District number 1211 (Pentagon Park Increment Financing District) is an economic development district established in 2014 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes with a termination date of 2043. District number 1212 (Grandview 2 Increment Financing District) is an economic development district established in 2016 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes with a termination date of 2045. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (69) NOTE 10 TAX INCREMENT DISTRICTS (CONTINUED) District number 1214 (66 West Increment Financing District) is an economic development district established in 2016 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes with a termination date of 2045. District number 1215 (50th and France 2) is an economic development district established in 2017 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes with a termination date of 2045. District number 1216 (44th and France 2) is a renewal and renovation development district established in 2019 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes with a termination date of 2036. District number 1217 (West 76th Street) is a housing district established in 2019 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes with a termination date of 2042. District number 1218 (72nd and France) is a housing district established in 2019 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes with a termination date of 2043. The following table reflects values as of December 31, 2019: TIF #1208 TIF #1211 TIF #1212 TIF #1214 TIF #1215 TIF #1216 TIF #1217 TIF #1218 Total Original Tax Capacity 7,289,563$ 691,608$ 39,890$ 25,525$ 57,986$ 43,163$ 51,818$ 217,506$ 8,417,059$ Current Tax Capacity 14,074,619 1,224,348 216,536 27,166 122,255 43,163 51,818 217,506 15,977,411 Fiscal Disparities 3,609,127 420,628 21,167 - 9,740 - - - 4,060,662 Tax Capacity Change 3,175,929 112,112 155,479 1,641 54,529 - - - 3,499,690 Retained Captured Tax Capacity 3,175,929$ 112,112$ 155,479$ 1,641$ 54,529$ -$ -$ -$ 3,499,690$ NOTE 11 CONTINGENCIES A. Risk Management The City is exposed to various risks of loss related to torts, theft of, damage to and destruction of assets; errors and omissions; injuries to employees; and natural disasters. Workers’ compensation insurance was provided through the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust. There is no deductible. The City has an annual deposit premium that is subject to adjustment based on the actual audited payroll. A package policy; including property, general liability, and automobile coverage, is provided through the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust. Under this policy, the City pays an annual premium and had a $75,000 per occurrence deductible and is subject to an annual aggregate deductible of $150,000, with a $1,000,000 per occurrence maximum. Liquor liability coverage is provided through the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust. The City pays an annual premium for this coverage and has a $1,000,000 annual maximum. Settlement claims have not exceeded insurance coverage for each of the past three years. There were no significant decreases in insurance coverage during 2019. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (70) NOTE 11 CONTINGENCIES (CONTINUED) B. Litigation The City attorney has indicated that existing and pending lawsuits, claims and other actions in which the City is a defendant are either covered by insurance; of an immaterial amount; or, in the judgment of the City attorney, remotely recoverable by plaintiffs. C. Federal and State Funds The City receives financial assistance from federal and state governmental agencies in the form of grants. The disbursement of funds received under these programs generally requires compliance with the terms and conditions specified in the grant agreements and is subject to audit by the grantor agencies. Any disallowed claims resulting from such audits could become a liability of the applicable fund. However, in the opinion of management, any such disallowed claims will not have a material effect on any of the financial statements of the individual fund types included herein or on the overall financial position of the City at December 31, 2019. D. Tax Increment Districts The City’s tax increment districts are subject to review by the state of Minnesota Office of the State Auditor (OSA). Any disallowed claims or misuse of tax increments could become a liability of the applicable fund. Management is not aware of any instances of noncompliance which would have a material effect on the financial statements. NOTE 12 CONDUIT DEBT OBLIGATION As of December 31, 2019, the City of Edina had four series of Housing and Health Care Revenue Bonds, with an aggregate principal amount payable of $28,260,000. The bonds are payable solely from revenues of the respective organizations and do not constitute an indebtedness of the City, and are not a charge against its general credit or taxing power. Accordingly, the bonds are not reported as liabilities in the accompanying financial statements. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (71) NOTE 13 JOINT VENTURE The City is a participant with the City of Bloomington, the City of Eden Prairie, and the Metropolitan Airport Commission in a joint venture to construct and operate a facility to be used for the training of law enforcement officers and firefighters. The South Metro Public Safety Training Facility Association (PSTF) is governed by a board consisting of one representative from each Member. On dissolution of the Association, the Facility shall revert to the City of Edina, and all remaining assets shall be divided among the members based on the Cost Sharing Formula. In accordance with the joint venture agreement, each member of the association will share in the cost of the construction and operation based on the Cost Sharing Formula. The City’s equity interest in the capital assets of the PSTF was $1,770,353. Complete financial statements for PSTF can be obtained from the City of Edina, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424. NOTE 14 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS The City pays an annual membership fee to the South Metro Public Safety Training Facility as part of the joint venture agreement. The membership fee is paid by the Police and Fire departments and is based on a Cost Sharing Formula. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the City paid a total of $61,640 in membership fees to the PSTF, equal to 17.9% of membership fees collected for the year. NOTE 15 SUBSEQUENT EVENT Subsequent to year-end, the World Health Organization declared the spread of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) a worldwide pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic is having significant effects on global markets, supply chains, businesses, and communities. Specific to the City of Edina, COVID-19 may impact various parts of its 2020 operations and financial results including, but not limited to, costs for emergency preparedness and closure of recreational facilities. Management believes the City is taking appropriate actions to mitigate the negative impact. However, the full impact of COVID-19 is unknown and cannot be reasonably estimated as these events occurred subsequent to year-end and are still developing. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (72) NOTE 16 FUND BALANCES A. Classifications At December 31, 2019, a summary of the City’s governmental fund balance classifications are as follows: General HRA Debt Service Construction Nonmajor Fund Fund Fund Fund Funds Total Nonspendable: 28,403$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 28,403$ Restricted: Park Dedication 58,086 - - - - 58,086 Tax Increments - 14,676,453 - - - 14,676,453 Affordable Housing - 1,547,145 - - - 1,547,145 Debt Service - - 8,341,996 - - 8,341,996 Pedestrian and Cyclist Improvements - - - - 492,057 492,057 Forfeitures - - - - 628,030 628,030 Grant Funds - - - - 85,628 85,628 Arts and Culture - - - - 46,945 46,945 Donations - - - - 123,682 123,682 Conservation and Sustainability Initiatives - - - - 1,053,089 1,053,089 Total Restricted 58,086 16,223,598 8,341,996 - 2,429,431 27,053,111 Assigned Compensated absences 1,594,418 - - - - 1,594,418 Race and equity 13,325 - - - - 13,325 Geographic information system (GIS) 137,743 - - - - 137,743 Building Security 195,295 - - - - 195,295 Unrealized Investment Gains or Losses 152,979 - - - - 152,979 Special projects - - - 3,978,491 - 3,978,491 Equipment - - - 4,455,065 - 4,455,065 PIR - - - 3,798,984 - 3,798,984 Construction - - - 9,694,709 - 9,694,709 Total Assigned 2,093,760 - - 21,927,249 - 24,021,009 Unassigned 16,411,412 - - - - 16,411,412 Total Fund Balance 18,591,661$ 16,223,598$ 8,341,996$ 21,927,249$ 2,429,431$ 67,513,935$ B. Unassigned Fund Balance Policy The City Council has formally adopted a fund balance policy regarding the desired range for unassigned fund balance for the general fund. The policy establishes a goal for unassigned general fund balance of 42% – 47% of the subsequent year’s budgeted property tax revenue. As of December 31, 2019, the City has $16,411,412 of unassigned fund balance in the general fund, or 56.0% of 2019 budgeted property tax revenue. This amount is $2,708,565 above the goal range identified in the policy. C. Deficit Fund Equity The following fund had a deficit fund balance/net position at December 31, 2019: Nonmajor Proprietary Funds: Art Center (100,798)$ CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE – GENERAL FUND YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 See accompanying Notes to Required Supplementary Information. (73) 2019 Actual Variance with Original Final Amounts Final Budget REVENUES Taxes: General Property Taxes 30,009,121$ 30,009,121$ 29,743,751$ (265,370)$ Franchise Taxes 870,500 870,500 821,932 (48,568) Lodging Tax 22,000 22,000 24,119 2,119 Total Taxes 30,901,621 30,901,621 30,589,802 (311,819) Licenses and Permits 4,714,430 4,714,430 5,109,994 395,564 Intergovernmental: Federal 60,000 60,000 106,389 46,389 State: Municipal State Aid 195,000 195,000 195,000 - Other 75,000 75,000 213,351 138,351 State Aid - Police 390,000 390,000 491,562 101,562 State Aid - Fire 415,000 415,000 460,081 45,081 Health Programs 118,977 118,977 119,061 84 Total Intergovernmental 1,253,977 1,253,977 1,585,444 331,467 Charges for Services: Administration 12,325 12,325 27,439 15,114 Communications and Technology 134,996 134,996 80,689 (54,307) Finance 510,008 510,008 508,013 (1,995) Public Works 17,000 17,000 5,845 (11,155) Engineering 226,400 226,400 220,974 (5,426) Police 648,354 648,354 778,131 129,777 Fire 2,378,100 2,378,100 2,805,988 427,888 Parks and Recreation 499,340 499,340 591,065 91,725 Community Development 95,000 95,000 172,561 77,561 Total Charges for Services 4,521,523 4,521,523 5,190,705 669,182 Fines and Forfeits 900,000 900,000 988,254 88,254 Miscellaneous: Investment Income 120,000 120,000 630,274 510,274 Rental of Property 425,150 425,150 487,797 62,647 Other 8,500 8,500 152,260 143,760 Total Miscellaneous 553,650 553,650 1,270,331 716,681 Total Revenues 42,845,201 42,845,201 44,734,530 1,889,329 Budgeted Amounts CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE – GENERAL FUND (CONTINUED) YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 See accompanying Notes to Required Supplementary Information. (74) 2019 Actual Variance with Original Final Amounts Final Budget EXPENDITURES Current: General Government: Administration: Personal Services 974,342$ 974,342$ 1,102,337$ 127,995$ Contractual Services 1,157,546 1,157,546 1,138,481 (19,065) Commodities 95,500 95,500 69,278 (26,222) Central Services 127,512 127,512 124,323 (3,189) Total Administration 2,354,900 2,354,900 2,434,419 79,519 Communications and Technology: Personal Services 829,150 829,150 893,325 64,175 Contractual Services 281,150 281,150 209,181 (71,969) Commodities 85,500 85,500 111,461 25,961 Central Services 92,964 92,964 91,397 (1,567) Total Communications and Technology 1,288,764 1,288,764 1,305,364 16,600 Human Resources: Personal Services 769,802 769,802 954,914 185,112 Contractual Services 80,200 80,200 39,738 (40,462) Commodities 2,800 2,800 2,132 (668) Central Services 35,892 35,892 36,271 379 Total Human Resources 888,694 888,694 1,033,055 144,361 Finance: Personal Services 720,429 720,429 711,440 (8,989) Contractual Services 241,150 241,150 270,789 29,639 Commodities 17,750 17,750 8,845 (8,905) Central Services 59,796 59,796 58,781 (1,015) Total Finance 1,039,125 1,039,125 1,049,855 10,730 Community Development: Personal Services 1,447,034 1,447,034 1,438,017 (9,017) Contractual Services 255,450 255,450 175,275 (80,175) Commodities 7,200 7,200 2,619 (4,581) Central Services 132,312 132,312 129,901 (2,411) Total Community Development 1,841,996 1,841,996 1,745,812 (96,184) Total General Government 7,413,479 7,413,479 7,568,505 155,026 Public Safety: Police: Personal Services 10,146,687 10,146,687 10,422,466 275,779 Contractual Services 821,016 821,016 816,134 (4,882) Commodities 97,424 97,424 89,583 (7,841) Central Services 1,335,036 1,335,036 1,298,718 (36,318) Total Police 12,400,163 12,400,163 12,626,901 226,738 Fire: Personal Services 7,380,162 7,380,162 7,334,087 (46,075) Contractual Services 679,200 679,200 626,948 (52,252) Commodities 327,400 327,400 288,463 (38,937) Central Services 648,456 648,456 638,504 (9,952) Total Fire 9,035,218 9,035,218 8,888,002 (147,216) Total Public Safety 21,435,381 21,435,381 21,514,903 79,522 Budgeted Amounts CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE – GENERAL FUND (CONTINUED) YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 See accompanying Notes to Required Supplementary Information. (75) 2019 Actual Variance with Original Final Amounts Final Budget Budgeted Amounts EXPENDITURES (CONTINUED) Current (Continued): Public Works: Public Works: Personal Services 2,822,158$ 2,822,158$ 3,075,231$ 253,073$ Contractual Services 1,157,300 1,157,300 1,283,840 126,540 Commodities 1,321,250 1,321,250 1,075,551 (245,699) Central Services 1,294,356 1,294,356 1,270,437 (23,919) Total Public Works 6,595,064 6,595,064 6,705,059 109,995 Engineering: Personal Services 1,488,452 1,488,452 1,358,317 (130,135) Contractual Services 206,500 206,500 69,741 (136,759) Commodities 25,000 25,000 38,838 13,838 Central Services 129,540 129,540 130,602 1,062 Total Engineering 1,849,492 1,849,492 1,597,498 (251,994) Total Public Works 8,444,556 8,444,556 8,302,557 (141,999) Parks: Parks and Recreation: Personal Services 3,388,664 3,388,664 3,244,178 (144,486) Contractual Services 1,196,110 1,196,110 1,281,350 85,240 Commodities 460,175 460,175 397,772 (62,403) Central Services 496,836 496,836 489,959 (6,877) Total Parks and Recreation 5,541,785 5,541,785 5,413,259 (128,526) Total parks 5,541,785 5,541,785 5,413,259 (128,526) Total Expenditures 42,835,201 42,835,201 42,799,224 (35,977) REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES 10,000 10,000 1,935,306 1,925,306 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) Utility Contribution from Other Funds - - 115,494 115,494 Transfers In 50,000 50,000 50,000 - Transfers Out - (2,458,564) (3,388,864) (930,300) Total Financing Sources (Uses) 50,000 (2,408,564) (3,223,370) (814,806) NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE 60,000$ (2,398,564)$ (1,288,064) 1,110,500$ Fund Balance - January 1 19,879,725 FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 18,591,661$ CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (HRA) FUND YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 See accompanying Notes to Required Supplementary Information. (76) 2019 Actual Variance with Original Final Amounts Final Budget REVENUES General Property Taxes 160,000$ 160,000$ 158,923$ (1,077)$ Tax increment Collections 5,315,000 5,315,000 5,447,108 132,108 Investment Income 120,500 120,500 499,356 378,856 Charges for Services - - 47,457 47,457 Other Revenues - - 160,000 160,000 Total Revenues 5,595,500 5,595,500 6,312,844 717,344 EXPENDITURES Current: Personal Services 168,305 168,305 177,708 9,403 Contractual Services 585,520 585,520 574,717 (10,803) Commodities 900 900 1,018 118 Capital Outlay 6,576,000 6,576,000 4,066,448 (2,509,552) Total Expenditures 7,330,725 7,330,725 4,819,891 (2,510,834) REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES (1,735,225) (1,735,225) 1,492,953 3,228,178 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) Transfers In 4,041,650 4,041,650 - (4,041,650) Transfers Out (4,041,650) (4,041,650) - 4,041,650 Sale of capital assets - - 884,900 884,900 Long-Term Loans Issued - - 750,000 750,000 Total Other Financing Sources (Uses) - - 1,634,900 1,634,900 NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE (1,735,225)$ (1,735,225)$ 3,127,853 4,863,078$ Fund Balance - January 1 13,095,745 FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 16,223,598$ Budgeted Amounts CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION OTHER POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PLAN SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN THE CITY’S TOTAL OPEB LIABILITY AND RELATED RATIOS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 Notes: The City implemented GASB Statement No. 75 in fiscal 2018. This schedule is intended to present 10-year trend information. Additional years will be added as they become available. No plan assets are accumulated in a trust that meets the criteria in paragraph 4 of GASB Statement No. 75. (77) December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 Total OPEB Liability: Service Cost 296,634$ 270,435$ Interest 128,559 127,096 Changes of Assumptions (178,824) 87,259 Benefit Payments (138,732) (133,679) Net Changes in Total OPEB Liability 107,637 351,111 Total OPEB Liability - Beginning of Year 3,509,875 3,158,764 Total OPEB Liability - End of Year 3,617,512$ 3,509,875$ Covered-Employee Payroll 24,800,000$ 23,900,000$ Total OPEB Liability as a Percentage of Covered-Employee Payroll 14.59% 14.69% Measurement Date CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION GERF SCHEDULE OF CITY’S AND NONEMPLOYER PROPORTIONATE SHARE OF NET PENSION LIABILITY AND SCHEDULE OF CITY CONTRIBUTIONS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 Note: The City implemented GASB Statement No. 68 in fiscal 2015 (using a June 30, 2015 measurement date). This schedule is intended to present 10-year trend information. Additional years will be added as they become available. (78) State's City's Plan Proportionate City's Proportionate Proportionate Fiduciary Net City's City's Share of the Share of the Net Pension Share of the Position as a PERA Fiscal Proportion Proportionate Net Pension Liability and the State's Net Pension Percentage City Fiscal Year-End Date of the Net Share of the Liability Proportionate Share of City's Liability as a of the Total Year End (Measurement Pension Net Pension Associated the Net Pension Liability Covered Percentage of Pension Date Date) Liability Liability with the City Associated with the City Payroll Covered Payroll Liability 12/31/2015 6/30/2015 0.2683% 13,765,652$ -$ 13,765,652$ 15,508,173$ 88.76% 78.20% 12/31/2016 6/30/2016 0.2656% 21,349,748 278,868 21,628,616 16,481,973 131.23% 68.91% 12/31/2017 6/30/2017 0.2772% 17,519,302 220,299 17,739,601 17,858,560 99.33% 75.90% 12/31/2018 6/30/2018 0.2679% 14,713,374 482,647 15,196,021 18,007,013 84.39% 79.53% 12/31/2019 6/30/2019 0.2694% 14,745,577 462,813 15,208,390 19,063,827 79.78% 80.00% Contributions in Relation to City Fiscal Statutorily the Statutorily Contribution Contributions as a Year-End Required Required Deficiency Covered Percentage of Covered Date Contributions Contributions (Excess) Payroll Payroll 12/31/2015 1,248,845$ 1,248,845$ -$ 16,651,267$ 7.50% 12/31/2016 1,265,817 1,265,817 - 16,877,560 7.50% 12/31/2017 1,317,596 1,317,596 - 17,567,947 7.50% 12/31/2018 1,378,743 1,378,743 - 18,382,627 7.50% 12/31/2019 1,471,059 1,471,059 - 19,614,120 7.50% Schedule of City Contributions Schedule of City's and Nonemployer Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION PEPFF SCHEDULE OF CITY’S PROPORTIONTE SHARE OF NET PENSION LIABILITY AND SHEDULE OF CITY CONTRIBUTIONS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 Note: The City implemented GASB Statement No. 68 in fiscal 2015 (using a June 30, 2015 measurement date). This schedule is intended to present 10-year trend information. Additional years will be added as they become available. (79) City's City's Proportionate PERA Fiscal Proportion City's Share of the Net Plan Fiduciary City Fiscal Year-End Date of the Net Proportionate Pension Liability Net Position Year-End (Measurement Pension Share of the Net City's Covered as a Percentage as a Percentage Date Date) Liability Pension Liability Payroll of Covered Payroll of the Total Pension 12/31/2015 6/30/2015 0.8070% 9,169,408$ 7,797,803$ 117.59% 86.60% 12/31/2016 6/30/2016 0.7990% 32,065,260 7,699,821 416.44% 63.88% 12/31/2017 6/30/2017 0.8110% 10,949,465 8,322,605 131.56% 85.43% 12/31/2018 6/30/2018 0.8022% 8,550,626 8,454,142 101.14% 88.84% 12/31/2019 6/30/2019 0.8479% 9,026,752 9,151,062 98.64% 89.30% Contributions in Relation to City Fiscal Statutorily the Statutorily Contribution Contributions as a Year-End Required Required Deficiency Covered Percentage of Date Contributions Contributions (Excess) Payroll Covered Payroll 12/31/2015 1,268,476$ 1,268,476$ -$ 7,830,099$ 16.20% 12/31/2016 1,272,485 1,272,485 - 7,854,846 16.20% 12/31/2017 1,335,917 1,335,917 - 8,246,401 16.20% 12/31/2018 1,399,053 1,399,053 - 8,623,704 16.22% 12/31/2019 1,595,304 1,595,304 - 9,847,556 16.20% Schedule of City's Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability Schedule of City Contributions CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 (80) NOTE 1 LEGAL COMPLIANCE – BUDGETS The City follows these procedures in establishing the budgetary data reflected in the preceding schedules: 1. The City Manager submits to the City Council a proposed operating budget for the fiscal year commencing the following January 1. The operating budget includes proposed expenditures and the means of financing them. 2. Public hearings are conducted to obtain taxpayer comments. 3. The budget is legally enacted by the passage of a resolution by the City Council. 4. Formal budgetary integration is employed as a management control device during the year. 5. Budgets for all governmental funds are adopted on a basis consistent with generally accepted accounting principles. 6. Reported budget amounts are as originally adopted or as amended by Council- approved supplemental appropriations and budget transfers. 7. Expenditures may not legally exceed appropriations by department in the General Fund unless offset by increases in revenues. All unencumbered appropriations lapse at year-end. NOTE 2 EXCESS OF EXPENDITURES OVER APPROPRIATIONS The General Fund is legally adopted on a basis consistent with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The legal level of budgetary control is at the department level for the General Fund. The following is a listing of General Fund departments whose expenditures exceed budget appropriations. Final Over Budget Actual Budget General Fund: General Government: Administration 2,354,900$ 2,434,419$ 79,519$ Communications and Technology 1,288,764 1,305,364 16,600 Human Resources 888,694 1,033,055 144,361 Finance 1,039,125 1,049,855 10,730 Public Safety: Police 12,400,163 12,626,901 226,738 Public Works: Public Works 6,595,064 6,705,059 109,995 Excess expenditures in the General Fund administration and community development departments are due to an increase in salaries due to new positions being added in 2018 that were not budgeted. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 (81) NOTE 2 EXCESS OF EXPENDITURES OVER APPROPRIATIONS (CONTINUED) Excess expenditures in the General Fund human resources department are due to increased severance expenses resulting from retirements. Excess expenditures in the General Fund public works department are due to increased blacktop and salt expenses resulting from weather and road conditions. The remaining governmental funds budgets are legally adopted on a basis consistent with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The legal level of budgetary control is at the fund level for these funds. The following is a listing of funds whose expenditures exceed budget appropriations. Final Over Budget Actual Budget Debt Service Fund 7,684,860$ 7,702,002$ 17,142$ Construction Fund 2,270,600 14,127,886 11,857,286 Community Development Block Grant 125,000 340,954 215,954 Police Fund 133,000 153,257 20,257 Environmental Efficiency Fund - 30,072 30,072 Excess expenditures in the debt service fund are the result of unbudgeted refunding’s of debt. Excess expenditures in the construction fund are the result of unbudgeted projects, with expenditures offset by alternative funding sources such as intergovernmental funding and state aid maintenance. Excess expenditures in the police fund are the result of purchasing new 911 logging technology. Excess expenditures in the environmental efficiency fund are the result of anticipating this fund to be fully spent in 2017 resulting in no budget being set for 2018 going forward. NOTE 3 PENSION INFORMATION General Employees Retirement Fund 2019 Changes Changes in Actuarial Assumptions The morality projection scale was changed from MP-2017 to MP-2018. Changes in Plan Provisions The employer supplemental contribution was changed prospectively, decreasing from $31.0 million to $21.0 million per year. The State’s special funding contribution was changed prospectively, requiring $16.0 million due per year through 2031. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 (82) NOTE 3 PENSION INFORMATION (CONTINUED) General Employees Retirement Fund (Continued) 2018 Changes Changes in Actuarial Assumptions: The mortality projection scale was changed from MP-2015 to MP-2017. The assumed benefit increase was changed from 1.00% per year through 2044 and 2.50% per year thereafter to 1.25% per year. Changes in Plan Provisions The augmentation adjustment in early retirement factors is eliminated over a five- year period starting July 1, 2019, resulting in actuarial equivalence after June 30, 2024. Interest credited on member contributions decreased from 4.00 percent to 3.00 percent, beginning July 1, 2018. Deferred augmentation was changed to 0.00 percent, effective January 1, 2019. Augmentation that has already accrued for deferred members will still apply. Contribution stabilizer provisions were repealed. Postretirement benefit increases were changed from 1.00 percent per year with a provision to increase to 2.50 percent upon attainment of 90.00 percent funding ratio to 50.00 percent of the Social Security Cost of Living Adjustment, not less than 1.00 percent and not more than 1.50 percent, beginning January 1, 2019. For retirements on or after January 1, 2024, the first benefit increase is delayed until the retiree reaches normal retirement age; does not apply to Rule of 90 retirees, disability benefit recipients, or survivors. Actuarial equivalent factors were updated to reflect revised mortality and interest assumptions. 2017 Changes Changes in Actuarial Assumptions: The Combined Service Annuity (CSA) loads were changed from 0.8% for active members and 60% for vested and nonvested deferred members. The revised CSA loads are now 0.0% for active member liability, 15.0% for vested deferred member liability, and 3.0% for nonvested deferred member liability. The assumed postretirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.0% per year for all years to 1.0% per year through 2044 and 2.5% per year thereafter. Changes in Plan Provisions The State’s contribution for the Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund equals $16,000,000 in 2017 and 2018, and $6,000,000 thereafter. The Employer Supplemental Contribution for the Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund changed from $21,000,000 to $31,000,000 in calendar years 2019 to 2031. The state’s contribution changed from $16,000,000 to $6,000,000 in calendar years 2019 to 2031. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 (83) NOTE 3 PENSION INFORMATION (CONTINUED) General Employees Fund Retirement Fund (Continued) 2016 Changes Changes in Actuarial Assumptions: The assumed postretirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.0% per year through 2035 and 2.5% per year thereafter to 1.0% per year for all years. The assumed investment return was changed from 7.9% to 7.5%. The single discount rate was changed from 7.9% to 7.5%. Other assumptions were changed pursuant to the experience study dated June 30, 2015. The assumed future salary increases, payroll growth, and inflation were decreased by 0.25% to 3.25% for payroll growth and 2.5% for inflation. Changes in Plan Provisions There have been no changes since the prior valuation. 2015 Changes Changes in Actuarial Assumptions: The assumed postretirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.0% per year through 2030 and 2.5% per year thereafter to 1.0% per year through 2035 and 2.5% per year thereafter. Changes in Plan Provisions: On January 1, 2015 the Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund was merged into the General Employees Fund, which increased the total pension liability by $1.1 billion and increased the fiduciary plan net position by $892 million. Upon consolidation, state and employer contributions were revised. Public Employees Police and Fire Fund 2019 Changes Changes in Actuarial Assumptions The morality projection scale was changed from MP-2017 to MP-2018. Changes in Plan Provisions There have been no changes since the prior valuation. 2018 Changes Changes in Actuarial Assumptions: The mortality projection scale was changed from MP-2016 to MP-2017. Changes in Plan Provisions Postretirement benefit increases were changed to 1.00 percent for all years, with no trigger. An end date of July 1, 2048 was added to the existing $9.0 million state contribution CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 (84) NOTE 3 PENSION INFORMATION (CONTINUED) Public Employees Police and Fire Fund (Continued) New annual state aid will equal $4.5 million in fiscal years 2019 and 2020, and $9.0 million thereafter until the plan reaches 100 percent funding, or July 1, 2048, if earlier. Member contributions were changed from 10.80 percent to 11.30 percent of pay, effective January 1, 2019 and 11.80 percent of pay, effective January 1, 2020. Employer contributions were changed from 16.20 percent to 16.95 percent of pay, effective January 1, 2019 and 17.70 percent of pay, effective January 1, 2020. Interest credited on member contributions decreased from 4.00 percent to 3.00 percent, beginning July 1, 2018. Deferred augmentation was changed to 0.00 percent, effective January 1, 2019. Augmentation that has already accrued for deferred members will still apply. Actuarial equivalent factors were updated to reflect revised mortality and interest assumptions. 2017 Changes Changes in Actuarial Assumptions: Assumed salary increases were changed as recommended in the June 30, 2016 experience study. The net effect is proposed rates that average 0.34% lower than the previous rates. Assumed rates of retirement were changed, resulting in fewer retirements. The Combined Service Annuity (CSA) load was 30% for vested and nonvested deferred members. The CSA has been changed to 33% for vested members and 2% for nonvested members. The base mortality table for healthy annuitants was changed from the RP-2000 fully generational table to the RP-2014 fully generational table (with a base year of 2006), with male rates adjusted by a factor of 0.96. The mortality improvement scale was changed from Scale AA to Scale MP-2016. The base mortality table for disabled annuitants was changed from the RP-2000 disabled mortality table to the mortality tables assumed for healthy retirees. Assumed termination rates were decreased to 3.0% for the first three years of service. Rates beyond the select period of three years were adjusted, resulting in more expected terminations overall. Assumed percentage of married female members was decreased from 65% to 60%. Assumed age difference was changed from separate assumptions for male members (wives assumed to be three years younger) and female members (husbands assumed to be four years older) to the assumption that males are two years older than females. The assumed percentage of female members electing Joint and Survivor annuities was increased. The assumed postretirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.0% for all years to 1.0% per year through 2064 and 2.5% thereafter. The single discount rate changed from 5.6% to 7.5% per annum. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 (85) NOTE 3 PENSION INFORMATION (CONTINUED) Public Employees Police and Fire Fund (Continued) Changes in Plan Provisions There have been no changes since the prior valuation. 2016 Changes Changes in Actuarial Assumptions: The assumed postretirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.05% per year through 2037 and 2.5% thereafter to 1.0% per year for all future years. The assumed investment return was changed from 7.9% to 7.5%. The single discount rate changed from 7.9% to 5.6%. The assumed future salary increases, payroll growth, and inflation were decreased by 0.25% to 3.25% for payroll growth and 2.5% for inflation. Changes in Plan Provisions There have been no changes since the prior valuation. 2015 Changes Changes in Plan Provisions: The postretirement benefit increase to be paid after attainment of the 90% funding threshold was changed, from inflation up to 2.5%, to a fixed rate of 2.5%. Changes in Actuarial Assumptions: The assumed postretirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.0% per year through 2030 and 2.5% per year thereafter to 1.0% per year through 2037 and 2.5% per year thereafter. NOTE 4 OTHER POSTEMPLOYMENT BENFITS INFORMATION Other Postemployment Benefits Plan 2019 Changes Changes in Actuarial Assumptions: The discount rate was changed from 3.44% to 4.09%. 2018 Changes Changes in Actuarial Assumptions: The discount rate was changed from 4.50% to 3.44%. (This page left blank intentionally.) NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS Special Revenue Funds A Special Revenue Fund is used to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources that are legally restricted to expenditures for specified purposes. The following are nonmajor special revenue funds: Community Development Block Grant Fund – This fund was established to account for funds received under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974. Police Fund – This fund was established to account for funds received for specific purposes within the police department, including E-911 and Forfeiture funds. Braemar Memorial Fund – This fund was established to account for funds donated to the City for the purpose of enhancing the Braemar golf course with equipment and amenities that might not otherwise be affordable or viewed as a necessity to the golf course. Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund – This fund was established to account for funds received from gas and electric franchise fees to be used for pedestrian and cyclist improvements included in future street reconstruction projects. Arts and Culture Fund – This fund was established to account for funds donated to the City for the purpose of enhancing public arts and culture related activities. Conservation and Sustainability Fund – This fund was established to account for funds received from gas and electric franchise fees to be used for initiatives focused on conservation and sustainability. Capital Project Funds A Capital Project Fund is used to account for and report financial resources used for the acquisition of capital assets. The following is a nonmajor capital project fund: Environmental Efficiency Fund – This fund was established to account for funds received through energy cost savings to be reinvested in future energy efficiencies. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMBINING BALANCE SHEET NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (86) Capital Projects Community Pedestrian Conservation Total Nonmajor Development Braemar and Cyclist Arts and and Environmental Governmental Block Grant Police Memorial Safety Culture Sustainability Efficiency Funds Cash and Investments -$ 703,101$ 123,227$ 312,666$ 46,807$ 854,711$ -$ 2,040,512$ Accrued Interest - - 455 1,617 138 2,094 - 4,304 Accounts Receivable - - - 305,628 - 235,231 - 540,859 Taxes Receivable - - - - 132 - - 132 Due from Other Funds - - - - - - - - Due from Other Governments - 15,294 - - - - - 15,294 Total Assets -$ 718,395$ 123,682$ 619,911$ 47,077$ 1,092,036$ -$ 2,601,101$ Liabilities: Accounts Payable -$ 4,737$ -$ 354$ -$ 35,445$ -$ 40,536$ Salaries Payable - - - 2,078 - 3,502 - 5,580 Contracts Payable - - - 125,422 - - - 125,422 Total Liabilities - 4,737 - 127,854 - 38,947 - 171,538 Deferred Inflows of Resources: Unavailable Revenue - Taxes - - - - 132 - - 132 Fund Balance: Restricted - 713,658 123,682 492,057 46,945 1,053,089 - 2,429,431 Total Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of Resources, and Fund Balance -$ 718,395$ 123,682$ 619,911$ 47,077$ 1,092,036$ -$ 2,601,101$ Special Revenue Assets Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of Resources, and Fund Balance CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 (87) Capital Projects Community Pedestrian Conservation Total Nonmajor Development Braemar and Cyclist Arts and and Environmental Governmental Block Grant Police Memorial Safety Culture Sustainability Efficiency Funds REVENUES General Property Taxes -$ -$ -$ -$ 20,000$ -$ -$ 20,000$ Franchise Taxes - - - 1,208,008 - 779,062 - 1,987,070 Intergovernmental 290,650 - - 9,315 - - - 299,965 Fines and Forfeitures - 108,868 - - - - - 108,868 Investment Income - 50 4,861 12,997 1,481 22,494 - 41,883 Other Revenues 50,304 112,061 200 - 2,398 55,112 - 220,075 Total Revenues 340,954 220,979 5,061 1,230,320 23,879 856,668 - 2,677,861 EXPENDITURES Current: General Government 340,954 - - - - 136,261 - 477,215 Public Safety - 140,331 - - - - - 140,331 Public Works - - - 192,742 - - 30,072 222,814 Parks - - 16,304 - 8,071 4,819 - 29,194 Capital Outlay: Public Safety - 12,926 - - - - - 12,926 Public Works - - - 932,723 - - - 932,723 Parks - - - - - 122,813 - 122,813 Total Expenditures 340,954 153,257 16,304 1,125,465 8,071 263,893 30,072 1,938,016 NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE - 67,722 (11,243) 104,855 15,808 592,775 (30,072) 739,845 Fund Balance - January 1 - 645,936 134,925 387,202 31,137 460,314 30,072 1,689,586 FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 -$ 713,658$ 123,682$ 492,057$ 46,945$ 1,053,089$ -$ 2,429,431$ Special Revenue CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA SPECIAL REVENUE FUND – COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES BUDGET AND ACTUAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 (88) Actual Variance with Original Final Amounts Final budget REVENUES Intergovernmental 125,000$ 125,000$ 290,650$ 165,650$ Other Revenues - - 50,304 50,304 Total Revenues 125,000 125,000 340,954 215,954 EXPENDITURES Current: General Government Contractual Services 125,000 125,000 340,954 215,954 NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE -$ -$ - -$ Fund Balance - January 1 - FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 -$ Budgeted Amounts CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA SPECIAL REVENUE FUND – POLICE SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES BUDGET AND ACTUAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 (89) Actual Variance with Original Final Amounts Final budget REVENUES Fines and Forfeiture 55,000$ 55,000$ 108,868$ 53,868$ Investment Income 4 4 50 46 Other Revenues 112,061 224,122 112,061 (112,061) Total Revenues 167,065 279,126 220,979 (58,147) EXPENDITURES Current: Public Safety: Contractual Services 78,000 78,000 110,047 32,047 Commodities 7,500 7,500 30,284 22,784 Capital Outlay: Public Safety 47,500 47,500 12,926 (34,574) Total Expenditures 133,000 133,000 153,257 20,257 NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE 34,065$ 146,126$ 67,722 (78,404)$ Fund Balance - January 1 645,936 FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 713,658$ Budgeted Amounts CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA SPECIAL REVENUE FUND – BRAEMAR MEMORIAL SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES BUDGET AND ACTUAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 (90) Actual Variance with Original Final Amounts Final budget REVENUES Investment Income 200$ 200$ 4,861$ 4,661$ Donations 5,000 5,000 200 (4,800) Total Revenues 5,200 5,200 5,061 (139) EXPENDITURES Current: Contractual Services - - 16,304 16,304 Capital Outlay: Parks 40,000 40,000 - (40,000) Total Expenditures 40,000 40,000 16,304 16,304 NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE (34,800)$ (34,800)$ (11,243) 23,557$ Fund Balance - January 1 134,925 FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 123,682$ Budgeted Amounts CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA SPECIAL REVENUE FUND – PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES BUDGET AND ACTUAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 (91) Actual Variance with Original Final Amounts Final budget REVENUES Franchise Taxes 1,200,000$ 1,200,000$ 1,208,008$ 8,008$ Intergovernmental - - 9,315 9,315 Investment Income - - 12,997 12,997 Total Revenues 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,230,320 30,320 EXPENDITURES Current: Public Works: Personal Services 133,679 133,679 102,331 (31,348) Contractual Services 20,000 20,000 80,890 60,890 Commodities 15,000 15,000 3,653 (11,347) Central Services 5,796 5,796 5,868 72 Capital Outlay: Public Works 1,070,887 1,070,887 932,723 (138,164) Total Expenditures 1,245,362 1,245,362 1,125,465 (119,897) NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE (45,362)$ (45,362)$ 104,855 150,217$ Fund Balance - January 1 387,202 FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 492,057$ Budgeted Amounts CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA SPECIAL REVENUE FUND – ARTS AND CULTURE SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES BUDGET AND ACTUAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 (92) Actual Variance with Original Final Amounts Final budget REVENUES General Property Taxes 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ -$ Investment Income 75 75 1,481 1,406 Other Revenues 5,150 5,150 2,398 (2,752) Total Revenues 25,225 25,225 23,879 (1,346) EXPENDITURES Current: Parks: Contractual Services 15,250 15,250 8,071 (7,179) Commodities 600 600 - (600) Total Expenditures 15,850 15,850 8,071 (7,779) NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE 9,375$ 9,375$ 15,808 6,433$ Fund balance - January 1 31,137 Fund balance - December 31 46,945$ Budgeted Amounts CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA SPECIAL REVENUE FUND – CONSERVATION AND SUSTAINABILITY SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES BUDGET AND ACTUAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 (93) Actual Variance with Original Final Amounts Final budget REVENUES Franchise Taxes 1,200,000$ 1,200,000$ 779,062$ (420,938)$ Investment Income - - 22,494 22,494 Other Revenues - - 55,112 55,112 Total Revenues 1,200,000 1,200,000 856,668 (343,332) EXPENDITURES Current: General Government: Personal Services 131,033 131,033 130,780 (253) Contractual Services 202,525 202,525 - (202,525) Commodities 400,000 400,000 - (400,000) Central Services 5,412 5,412 5,481 69 Parks: Contractual Services 50,000 50,000 4,819 (45,181) Capital Outlay: Parks 400,000 400,000 122,813 (277,187) Total Expenditures 1,188,970 1,188,970 263,893 (925,077) NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE 11,030$ 11,030$ 592,775 581,745$ Fund Balance - January 1 460,314 FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 1,053,089$ Budgeted Amounts CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND – ENVIRONMENTAL EFFICIENCY SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES BUDGET AND ACTUAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 (94) Actual Variance with Original Final Amounts Final budget EXPENDITURES Current: Personal Services: Contractual Services -$ -$ 30,072$ 30,072$ NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE -$ -$ (30,072) (30,072)$ Fund Balance - January 1 30,072 FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 -$ Budgeted Amounts MAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS Debt Service Fund – This fund was established to account for the payment of principal and interest on the General Obligation, Permanent Improvement Revolving, Public Project Revenue, and Edina Emerald Energy Program Bonds. Construction Fund – This fund was established to account for various special assessment and state aid projects throughout the City. This fund also provides financing for capital improvements as designated in the City’s capital improvement budget. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA GOVERNMENTAL FUND – DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES BUDGET AND ACTUAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 (95) Actual Variance with Original Final Amounts Final budget REVENUES General Property Taxes 4,611,900$ 4,611,900$ 4,565,604$ (46,296)$ Special Assessments - - 271,018 271,018 Investment Income 6,000 6,000 1,571 (4,429) Total Revenues 4,617,900 4,617,900 4,838,193 220,293 EXPENDITURES Debt Service 7,684,860 7,684,860 7,702,002 17,142 REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES (3,066,960) (3,066,960) (2,863,809) 203,151 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) Transfers In 3,298,163 3,298,163 3,100,000 (198,163) Bonds Issued - - 233,947 233,947 Total Other Financing Sources (Uses) 3,298,163 3,298,163 3,333,947 35,784 NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE 231,203$ 231,203$ 470,138 238,935$ Fund Balance - January 1 7,871,858 FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 8,341,996$ Budgeted Amounts CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA GOVERNMENTAL FUND – CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES BUDGET AND ACTUAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 (96) Actual Variance with Original Final Amounts Final budget REVENUES General Property Taxes -$ -$ 2,604,796$ 2,604,796$ Franchise Taxes 98,000 98,000 72,724 (25,276) Special Assessments - - 4,470,539 4,470,539 License and Permits - - 73,760 73,760 Intergovernmental - - 1,802,211 1,802,211 Charges for Services - - 193,779 193,779 Investment Income 155,000 155,000 816,797 661,797 Other Revenues - - 68,570 68,570 Total Revenues 253,000 253,000 10,103,176 9,850,176 EXPENDITURES Current: General Government: Personal Services - - 5,137 5,137 Contractual Services - - 168,894 168,894 Public Safety: Contractual Services - - 39,731 39,731 Commodities - - 6,289 6,289 Public Works: Personal Services - - 164,108 164,108 Contractual Services - - 250,423 250,423 Commodities - - 56,984 56,984 Central Services - - 1,882 1,882 Parks: Personal Services - - 1,872 1,872 Contractual Services - - 8,530 8,530 Commodities - - 923 923 Capital Outlay: General Government 167,500 694,500 2,132,326 1,437,826 Public Safety 366,000 366,000 3,449,492 3,083,492 Public Works 1,156,100 1,156,100 5,369,985 4,213,885 Parks 54,000 54,000 2,471,310 2,417,310 Total Expenditures 1,743,600 2,270,600 14,127,886 11,857,286 REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES (1,490,600) (2,017,600) (4,024,710) (2,007,110) OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) Transfers In - - 3,588,864 3,588,864 Transfers Out - - (3,215,872) (3,215,872) Sale of Capital Assets - - 287,491 287,491 Bonds Issued - - 4,766,053 4,766,053 Premium on Bonds Issued - - 799,080 799,080 Total Other Financing Sources (Uses) - - 6,225,616 6,225,616 NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE (1,490,600)$ (2,017,600)$ 2,200,906 4,218,506$ Fund Balance - January 1 19,726,343 FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 21,927,249$ Budgeted Amounts (This page left blank intentionally.) NONMAJOR PROPRIETARY FUNDS Enterprise Funds Enterprise funds account for the financing of self-supporting activities of governmental units which render services to the general public on a user charge basis. The following are nonmajor enterprise funds: Art Center Fund – This fund accounts for activities related to the City’s Art Center. Edinborough Park Fund – This fund accounts for activities related to Edinborough Park. Centennial Lakes Fund – This fund accounts for activities related to Centennial Lakes Park. Sports Dome Fund – This fund accounts for activities related to the Sports Dome. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMBINING STATEMENT OF NET POSITION NONMAJOR PROPRIETARY FUNDS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (97) Total Nonmajor Art Edinborough Centennial Sports Proprietary Center Park Lakes Dome Funds ASSETS Current Assets: Cash and Investments 224,718$ 2,278,450$ 757,719$ 909,550$ 4,170,437$ Interest Receivable 582 7,920 2,348 2,812 13,662 Accounts Receivable - 17,979 27,587 62,078 107,644 Inventory 4,510 - - - 4,510 Total Current Assets 229,810 2,304,349 787,654 974,440 4,296,253 Noncurrent Assets: Net Capital Assets 48,653 793,901 263,152 6,986,324 8,092,030 Total Assets 278,463 3,098,250 1,050,806 7,960,764 12,388,283 DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES OPEB Deferred Outflows 532 1,597 1,064 - 3,193 Pension Deferred Outflows 27,812 41,718 27,812 13,906 111,248 Total Deferred Outflows of Resources 28,344 43,315 28,876 13,906 114,441 LIABILITIES Current Liabilities: Accounts Payable 12,107 38,253 6,920 11,788 69,068 Salaries Payable 10,384 26,857 18,591 3,390 59,222 Due to Other Governments 807 8,079 1,503 4,819 15,208 Unearned Revenue 9,215 30 - 41,184 50,429 Compensated Absences Payable 1,774 15,572 37,998 - 55,344 Total Current Liabilities 34,287 88,791 65,012 61,181 249,271 Noncurrent Liabilities: Total OPEB Liability 12,768 28,715 23,212 - 64,695 Net Pension Liability 297,891 446,836 297,891 148,945 1,191,563 Compensated Absences Payable 2,660 23,359 56,997 - 83,016 Total Noncurrent Liabilities 313,319 498,910 378,100 148,945 1,339,274 Total Liabilities 347,606 587,701 443,112 210,126 1,588,545 DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES OPEB Deferred Inflows 400 1,201 800 - 2,401 Pension Deferred Inflows 59,599 89,398 59,599 29,799 238,395 Total Deferred Inflows of Resources 59,999 90,599 60,399 29,799 240,796 NET POSITION Net Investment in Capital Assets 48,653 793,901 263,152 6,986,324 8,092,030 Unrestricted (149,451) 1,669,364 313,019 748,421 2,581,353 Total Net Position (100,798)$ 2,463,265$ 576,171$ 7,734,745$ 10,673,383$ CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND CHANGES IN FUND NET POSITION NONMAJOR PROPRIETARY FUNDS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 (98) Total Nonmajor Art Edinborough Centennial Sports Proprietary Center Park Lakes Dome Funds OPERATING REVENUES Sales - Retail 35,159$ -$ -$ -$ 35,159$ Sales - Concessions 100 131,821 22,289 - 154,210 Memberships 15,102 117,000 - - 132,102 Admissions - 708,965 - 27,338 736,303 Building Rental - 212,685 97,196 546,637 856,518 Rental of Equipment - 11,840 153,579 - 165,419 Greens Fees - - 227,081 - 227,081 Class Registration and Other Fees 366,614 192,592 363,950 3,946 927,102 Total Operating Revenues 416,975 1,374,903 864,095 577,921 3,233,894 OPERATING EXPENSES Cost of Sales and Services 2,758 77,286 10,105 - 90,149 Personal Services 490,328 775,761 719,003 154,392 2,139,484 Contractual Services 90,791 343,924 194,980 158,260 787,955 Commodities 54,666 143,546 141,267 29,850 369,329 Central Services 41,243 75,791 69,649 17,550 204,233 Depreciation 5,890 140,202 36,681 512,850 695,623 Total Operating Expenses 685,676 1,556,510 1,171,685 872,902 4,286,773 OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)(268,701) (181,607) (307,590) (294,981) (1,052,879) NONOPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES) Investment Income 6,217 84,559 25,043 30,085 145,904 Donations 15,425 - 13,000 - 28,425 Miscellaneous - 7,440 1,434 - 8,874 Total Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses) 21,642 91,999 39,477 30,085 183,203 INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE TRANSFERS (247,059) (89,608) (268,113) (264,896) (869,676) CONTRIBUTIONS AND TRANSFERS Transfers In 200,000 12,985 342,115 929 556,029 CHANGE IN NET POSITION (47,059) (76,623) 74,002 (263,967) (313,647) Net Position - January 1 (53,739) 2,539,888 502,169 7,998,712 10,987,030 NET POSITION - DECEMBER 31 (100,798)$ 2,463,265$ 576,171$ 7,734,745$ 10,673,383$ CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMBINING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS NONMAJOR PROPRIETARY FUNDS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 (99) Total Nonmajor Art Edinborough Centennial Sports Proprietary Center Park Lakes Dome Funds CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES Receipts from Customers and Users 416,975$ 1,366,381$ 838,159$ 500,473$ 3,121,988$ Payment to Suppliers (193,812) (636,044) (432,638) (213,156) (1,475,650) Payment to Employees (473,931) (764,302) (705,825) (149,748) (2,093,806) Net Cash Provided (Used) by Operating Activities (250,768) (33,965) (300,304) 137,569 (447,468) CASH FLOWS FROM NONCAPITAL FINANCING ACTIVITIES Transfer from Other Funds 200,000 12,985 342,115 929 556,029 Miscellaneous Received 15,425 7,440 14,434 - 37,299 Net Cash Provided by Noncapital Financing Activities 215,425 20,425 356,549 929 593,328 CASH FLOWS FROM CAPITAL AND RELATED FINANCING ACTIVITIES Acquisition of Capital Assets - (56,423) (96,821) - (153,244) CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES Interest Received 6,233 85,358 25,473 29,758 146,822 NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND INVESTMENTS (29,110) 15,395 (15,103) 168,256 139,438 Cash and Investments - January 1 253,828 2,263,055 772,822 741,294 4,030,999 CASH AND INVESTMENTS - DECEMBER 31 224,718$ 2,278,450$ 757,719$ 909,550$ 4,170,437$ RECONCILIATION OF OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) TO NET CASH PROVIDED (USED) BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES Operating Income (Loss) (268,701)$ (181,607)$ (307,590)$ (294,981)$ (1,052,879)$ Adjustments to Reconcile Operating Income (Loss) to Net Cash Provided (Used) by Operating Activities: Depreciation 5,890 140,202 36,681 512,850 695,623 (Increase) Decrease in: Receivables - (8,522) (25,936) (44,928) (79,386) Inventory 2,659 - - - 2,659 Deferred Outflows of Resources 31,883 47,839 31,893 15,937 127,552 Increase (Decrease) in: Accounts Payable (6,879) 4,900 (15,782) (5,653) (23,414) Salaries Payable 4,656 2,684 1,245 851 9,436 Due to Other Governments (134) (397) (855) (1,843) (3,229) Unearned Revenue - - - (32,520) (32,520) Total OPEB Liability 269 807 539 - 1,615 Net Pension Liability 651 976 651 325 2,603 Compensated Absences 3,476 (4,641) 2,988 - 1,823 Deferred Inflows of Resources (24,538) (36,206) (24,138) (12,469) (97,351) Total Adjustments 17,933 147,642 7,286 432,550 605,411 Net Cash Provided (Used) by Operating Activities (250,768)$ (33,965)$ (300,304)$ 137,569$ (447,468)$ NONCASH INVESTING ACTIVITIES Increase (Decrease) in Fair Value of Investments (2,057)$ (28,516)$ (8,626)$ (9,575)$ (48,774)$ FIDUCIARY FUNDS Agency Funds Agency funds are used to report resources held by the City in a purely custodial capacity. The following are agency funds: Police Seizure Fund – This fund accounts for assets seized by the Police Department. Public Safety Training Facility – This fund accounts for assets and liabilities of the South Metro Public Safety Training Facility, which is a joint venture that the City has fiduciary responsibilities for. Minnesota Task Force 1 – This fund accounts for assets and liabilities of the Minnesota Task Force 1, which is comprised of personnel and equipment from public safety and specialist personnel from supporting entities that operates as part of a joint powers agreement that the City has administrative responsibilities for. Payroll Fund – This fund accounts for assets withheld from employee paychecks that the City plans to remit to various third parties, including state and local governments, insurance providers, and others. (This page left blank intentionally.) CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMBINING STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES AGENCY FUNDS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 (100) Balance Balance January 1 Additions Deductions December 31 POLICE SEIZURE Assets: Cash and Investments 11,538$ 209$ -$ 11,747$ Liabilities: Due to Other Governmental Units 11,538$ 209$ -$ 11,747$ PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING FACILITY Assets: Cash and Investments 451,382$ 673,752$ 625,264$ 499,870$ Liabilities: Accounts Payable 5,943$ 253,281$ 253,880$ 5,344$ Salaries Payable 6,399 279,928 279,851 6,476 Due to Other Governmental Units 439,040 140,543 91,533 488,050 Total Liabilities 451,382$ 673,752$ 625,264$ 499,870$ MINNESOTA TASK FORCE 1 Assets: Due from Other Governmental Units 52,577$ 984,021$ 958,237$ 78,361$ Liabilities: Salaries Payable 3,420$ 149,003$ 148,229$ 4,194$ Due to Other Governmental Units 49,157 835,018 810,008 74,167 Total Liabilities 52,577$ 984,021$ 958,237$ 78,361$ PAYROLL Assets: Cash and Investments 236,482$ 67,433,076$ 67,426,392$ 243,166$ Liabilities: Accounts Payable 236,482$ 67,433,076$ 67,426,392$ 243,166$ TOTALS - ALL AGENCY FUNDS Assets: Cash and Investments 699,402$ 68,107,037$ 68,051,656$ 754,783$ Due from Other Governmental Units 52,577 984,021 958,237 78,361 Total Assets 751,979$ 69,091,058$ 69,009,893$ 833,144$ Liabilities: Accounts Payable 242,425$ 67,686,357$ 67,680,272$ 248,510$ Salaries Payable 9,819 428,931 428,080 10,670 Due to Other Governmental Units 499,735 975,770 901,541 573,964 Total Liabilities 751,979$ 69,091,058$ 69,009,893$ 833,144$ CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TAX CAPACITY, TAX LEVIES, AND TAX CAPACITY RATES (SHOWN BY YEAR OF TAX COLLECTIBILITY) (101) 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Tax Capacity 125,663,820$ 132,180,439$ 141,934,212$ 151,279,391$ 157,910,360$ Increment Valuation (2,493,368) (3,474,097) (4,525,127) (5,229,452) (5,929,603) Contribution to Fiscal Disparities Pool (10,679,187) (11,851,919) (12,166,916) (13,440,625) (14,369,737) Tax Capacity Used for Rate Calculation 112,491,265 116,854,423 125,242,169 132,609,314 137,611,020 Fiscal Disparities Distribution 2,636,381 2,901,964 3,210,559 3,473,642 3,700,282 Adjusted Net Tax Capacity 115,127,646$ 119,756,387$ 128,452,728$ 136,082,956$ 141,311,302$ Tax Levies: General Fund 25,023,952$ 26,860,319$ 28,493,077$ 30,009,121$ 32,021,243$ Arts and Culture Fund 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Equipment 1,680,000 2,251,550 2,567,000 2,630,000 2,830,000 Debt Service 4,503,521 4,595,500 4,579,700 4,611,900 4,596,300 HRA Operating - 95,000 125,000 160,000 192,000 Total Certified Tax Levies 31,227,473 33,822,369 35,784,777 37,431,021 39,659,543 Referendum Market Value Levy 571,650 - - - Total Levy 31,799,123$ 33,822,369$ 35,784,777$ 37,431,021$ 39,659,543$ Tax Capacity Rate: General Fund Revenue 23.223% 24.348% 24.187% 23.992% 24.690% Bonds and Interest 3.914% 3.841% 3.564% 3.388% 3.255% HRA 0.000% 0.082% 0.098% 0.119% 0.137% Total Tax Capacity Rate 27.137% 28.271% 27.849% 27.499% 28.082% Market Value Rate 0.00550% 0.00000% 0.00000% 0.00000% 0.00000% CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMBINING SCHEDULE OF BONDED INDEBTEDNESS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (102) Final Interest Maturity Original Rates Date Date Issue Redeemed General Obligation Bonds: GO Capital Improvement Plan, Series 2010A 2.00 - 4.00 11/18/10 02/01/21 8,285,000$ 5,705,000$ GO Capital Improvement Plan, Series 2013A - Refunding 3.00 - 3.50 10/10/13 02/01/30 5,710,000 1,440,000 GO Refunding, Series 2016A 2.00 - 3.00 07/06/16 02/01/28 3,635,000 285,000 GO Refunding, Series 2017C 2.05 - 4.00 12/14/17 02/01/29 8,955,000 - GO Equipment Certificate, Series 2019A 5.00 06/13/19 02/01/29 - - Total General Obligation Bonds 26,585,000 7,430,000 Permanent Improvement Revolving (PIR) Bonds: GO Permanent Improvement Revolving Series 2010B 2.00 - 3.00 11/18/10 02/01/22 2,305,000 1,325,000 GO Permanent Improvement Revolving Series 2011A 2.00 - 3.00 10/27/11 02/01/23 3,320,000 1,565,000 GO Permanent Improvement Revolving Series 2012A 3.00 - 4.00 11/15/12 02/01/29 2,675,000 590,000 GO Permanent Improvement Revolving Series 2012A - Refunding 3.00 - 4.00 11/15/12 02/01/19 1,990,000 1,765,000 GO Permanent Improvement Revolving Series 2013A 3.00 - 3.50 10/10/13 02/01/30 2,555,000 425,000 GO Permanent Improvement Revolving Series 2014B - Refunding 2.00 - 3.00 12/11/14 02/01/20 4,075,000 2,350,000 GO Permanent Improvement Revolving Series 2015A 2.00 - 4.00 07/09/15 02/01/32 6,545,000 355,000 GO Permanent Improvement Revolving Series 2015A - Parking 2.00 - 4.00 07/09/15 02/01/36 2,495,000 190,000 GO Permanent Improvement Revolving Series 2016A 2.00 - 3.00 07/06/16 02/01/33 3,940,000 - GO Permanent Improvement Revolving Series 2017A 3.00 - 4.00 06/29/17 02/01/34 1,995,000 - GO Permanent Improvement Revolving Series 2018A 3.00 - 3.125 06/27/18 02/01/35 2,210,000 - GO Permanent Improvement Revolving Series 2019A 3.00 - 5.00 06/13/19 02/01/36 - - Total PIR Bonds 34,105,000 8,565,000 Public Project Revenue Bonds: Taxable Public Project Revenue, Series 2009A 2.10 - 4.55 11/24/09 02/01/30 2,595,000 1,075,000 HRA Public Project Revenue, Series 2014A 2.00 - 3.625 07/15/14 02/01/35 16,155,000 1,880,000 HRA Public Project Revenue, Series 2015A - Refunding 2.50 - 3.00 07/09/15 05/01/26 3,490,000 845,000 Total Public Project Revenue Bonds 22,240,000 3,800,000 Edina Emerald Energy Program Revenue Bonds: Edina Emerald Energy Progrm Revenue, 2012A 7.00 02/25/12 01/01/23 33,690 20,214 Revenue Bonds: Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2012B .45 - 1.60 11/15/12 02/01/20 815,000 610,000 Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2012C 2.00 - 3.00 11/15/12 02/01/33 2,100,000 - Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2013B 3.00 - 3.45 10/10/13 02/01/29 1,125,000 245,000 Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2015B 2.00 - 3.25 07/09/15 02/01/31 2,140,000 240,000 Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2017B 3.00 - 4.00 06/29/17 02/01/33 7,425,000 80,000 Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2017D - Refunding 2.00 12/20/17 02/01/30 1,640,000 57,000 Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2011A 2.00 - 3.00 10/27/11 02/01/22 11,230,000 6,415,000 Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2012A 3.00 - 4.00 11/15/12 02/01/23 6,100,000 2,745,000 Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2014A 2.00 - 3.00 07/15/14 02/01/24 5,680,000 2,160,000 Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B - Refunding 3.00 12/11/14 02/01/19 5,710,000 4,205,000 Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2015A 2.00 - 4.00 07/09/15 02/01/25 5,235,000 1,485,000 Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2016A 2.00 - 3.00 07/06/16 02/01/27 8,775,000 765,000 Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2017A 3.00 - 4.00 06/29/17 02/01/28 6,595,000 - Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2018A 3.00 - 3.125 06/27/18 02/01/29 3,305,000 - Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2019A 5.00 06/13/19 02/01/30 - - Total Public Project Revenue Bonds 67,875,000 19,007,000 Total - Bonded indebtedness 150,838,690$ 38,822,214$ Prior Years CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMBINING SCHEDULE OF BONDED INDEBTEDNESS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 2019 (103) Principal Interest Interest Outstanding Payable Due Due Payable 12/31/2018 Issued Payments 12/31/2019 In 2020 In 2020 to Maturity 2,580,000$ -$ 825,000$ 1,755,000$ 860,000$ 53,000$ 70,900$ 4,270,000 - 305,000 3,965,000 315,000 112,950 699,537 3,350,000 - 295,000 3,055,000 305,000 77,175 362,350 8,955,000 - 630,000 8,325,000 700,000 267,050 1,323,153 - 2,805,000 - 2,805,000 - 158,950 835,825 19,155,000 2,805,000 2,055,000 19,905,000 2,180,000 669,125 3,291,765 980,000 - 235,000 745,000 240,000 18,150 33,375 1,755,000 - 335,000 1,420,000 340,000 37,500 86,700 2,085,000 - 160,000 1,925,000 165,000 55,275 302,475 225,000 - 225,000 - - - - 2,130,000 - 150,000 1,980,000 155,000 56,425 349,300 1,725,000 - 845,000 880,000 880,000 8,800 8,800 6,190,000 - 365,000 5,825,000 370,000 184,575 1,347,638 2,305,000 - 100,000 2,205,000 100,000 73,250 716,350 3,940,000 - 215,000 3,725,000 220,000 99,800 766,500 1,995,000 - - 1,995,000 100,000 65,900 516,400 2,210,000 - - 2,210,000 - 70,843 635,709 - 2,195,000 - 2,195,000 - 100,697 846,222 25,540,000 2,195,000 2,630,000 25,105,000 2,570,000 771,215 5,609,469 1,520,000 - 125,000 1,395,000 130,000 55,321 282,297 14,275,000 - 660,000 13,615,000 680,000 423,069 3,931,603 2,645,000 - 295,000 2,350,000 305,000 62,300 233,812 18,440,000 - 1,080,000 17,360,000 1,115,000 540,690 4,447,712 13,476 - 13,476 - - - - 205,000 - 130,000 75,000 75,000 600 600 2,100,000 - - 2,100,000 60,000 52,894 418,122 880,000 - 70,000 810,000 70,000 24,465 138,022 1,900,000 - 125,000 1,775,000 125,000 50,094 343,397 7,345,000 - 400,000 6,945,000 420,000 248,100 1,762,950 1,583,000 - 124,000 1,459,000 126,000 28,550 165,850 4,815,000 - 1,160,000 3,655,000 1,185,000 91,875 166,575 3,355,000 - 630,000 2,725,000 655,000 71,925 166,275 3,520,000 - 550,000 2,970,000 560,000 74,750 212,825 1,505,000 - 1,505,000 - - - - 3,750,000 - 495,000 3,255,000 510,000 98,700 349,100 8,010,000 - 795,000 7,215,000 815,000 182,687 760,681 6,595,000 - 550,000 6,045,000 570,000 215,100 1,028,150 3,305,000 - - 3,305,000 285,000 105,225 591,150 - 5,815,000 - 5,815,000 - 329,517 1,899,642 48,868,000 5,815,000 6,534,000 48,149,000 5,456,000 1,574,482 8,003,339 112,016,476$ 10,815,000$ 12,312,476$ 110,519,000$ 11,321,000$ 3,555,512$ 21,352,285$ 2019 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA SCHEDULE OF BALANCE SHEET ACCOUNTS TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS DECEMBER 31, 2019 (104) Centennial Valley View Southdale 2 Pentagon Park Grandview 2 66th West 50th and France 2 West 76th Street TotalDistrict District District District District District District District Tax IncrementNo. 1203 No. 1207 No. 1208 No. 1211 No. 1212 No. 1214 No. 1215 No. 1217 Financing DistrictsASSETSCash and Investments 441,231$ 350,521$ 11,475,685$ 418,460$ 417,660$ 20,232$ -$ (517)$ 13,123,272$ Accrued Interest - 1,889 35,701 640 1,332 3 - - 39,565 Due from Other Districts 6,900,000 - 275,000 - - - - - 7,175,000 Due from Other Governments - - 6,495 3,898 - - - - 10,393 Total Assets7,341,231$ 352,410$ 11,792,881$ 422,998$ 418,992$ 20,235$ -$ (517)$ 20,348,230$ LIABILITIESAccounts Payable 49,964$ -$ 11,285$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 61,249$ Salaries Payable 594 - - - - - - - 594 Contracts Payable - 15,731 - - - - - - 15,731 Due to Other Districts - - 2,150,000 100,000 500,000 275,000 4,150,000 - 7,175,000 Unearned Revenue 113,000 - - - - - - - 113,000 Total Liabilities 163,558 15,731 2,161,285 100,000 500,000 275,000 4,150,000 - 7,365,574 FUND BALANCERestricted 7,177,673 336,679 9,631,596 322,998 (81,008) (254,765) (4,150,000) (517) 12,982,656 Total Liabilities andFund Balance 7,341,231$ 352,410$ 11,792,881$ 422,998$ 418,992$ 20,235$ -$ (517)$ 20,348,230$ CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 (105) Total TaxCentennial Valley View Southdale 2 Pentagon Park Grandview 2 66th West 50th and France West 7th Street IncrementDistrict District District District District District France 2 District District FinancingNo. 1203 No. 1207 No. 1208 No. 1211 No. 1211 No. 1214 No. 1215 No. 1217 DistrictsREVENUESTax Increment Collections -$ -$ 5,045,361$ 323,691$ 56,789$ 21,267$ -$ -$ 5,447,108$ Investment Income (1,899) 20,139 382,297 6,883 14,304 32 - - 421,756 Total Revenues (1,899) 20,139 5,427,658 330,574 71,093 21,299 - - 5,868,864 EXPENDITURESCurrent:General Government 161,234 - 436,845 15,102 275 - - 517 613,456 Capital Outlay:General Government 863,349 309,656 2,893,443 - - - - - 4,066,448 Total Expenditures 1,024,583 309,656 3,330,288 15,102 275 - - 517 4,679,904 REVENUES OVER (UNDER)EXPENDITURES(1,026,482) (289,517) 2,097,370 315,472 70,818 21,299 - (517) 1,188,960 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)Transfers In (Out) (1,983,784) - - (11,662) - - 1,983,784 - (11,662) Sale of Capital Assets 884,900 - - - - - - - 884,900 Interfund Loan Interest 111,000 - (111,000) - - - - - - Total Other Financing Sources (Uses) (987,884) - (111,000) (11,662) - - 1,983,784 - 873,238 NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE(2,014,366) (289,517) 1,986,370 303,810 70,818 21,299 1,983,784 (517) 2,062,198 Fund Balance - January 1 9,192,039 626,196 7,645,226 19,188 (151,826) (276,064) (6,133,784) - 10,920,975 FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 317,177,673$ 336,679$ 9,631,596$ 322,998$ (81,008)$ (254,765)$ (4,150,000)$ (517)$ 12,983,173$ STATISTICAL SECTION This part of the City’s comprehensive annual financial report presents detailed information as a context for understanding what the information in the financial statements, note disclosures, and required supplementary information says about the City’s overall financial health. Contents Page Financial Trends 106 These schedules contain trend information to help the reader understand how the City’s financial performance and well-being have changed over time. Revenue Capacity 114 These schedules contain information to help the reader assess the City’s most significant local revenue source, the property tax. Debt Capacity 118 These schedules contain information to help the reader assess the affordability of the City’s current levels of outstanding debt and the City’s ability to issue additional debt in the future. Demographic and Economic Information 123 These schedules offer demographic and economic indicators to help the reader understand the environment within which the City’s financial activities take place. Operating Information 124 These schedules contain service and infrastructure data to help the reader understand how the information in the City’s financial report relates to the services the City provides and the activities it performs. Sources: Unless otherwise noted, the information in these schedules is derived from the comprehensive annual financial reports for the relevant year. (This page left blank intentionally.) CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NET POSITION BY COMPONENT LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (ACCRUAL BASIS OF ACCOUNTING) (106) 2010 2011 2012 2013a GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES Net Investment in Capital Assets 69,783,162$ 75,045,018$ 78,644,392$ 83,842,970$ Restricted 9,952,443 22,915,776 23,215,910 20,289,579 Unrestricted 41,709,528 29,544,149 29,587,700 33,242,317 Total Governmental Activities Net Position 121,445,133$ 127,504,943$ 131,448,002$ 137,374,866$ BUSINESS-TYPE ACTIVITIES Net Investment in Capital Assets 48,807,806$ 56,877,100$ 63,766,144$ 66,126,387$ Restricted 618,852 623,099 876,909 611,377 Unrestricted 17,041,122 12,926,674 14,390,609 16,867,459 Total Business-Type Activities Net Position 66,467,780$ 70,426,873$ 79,033,662$ 83,605,223$ PRIMARY GOVERNMENT Net Investment in Capital Assets 118,590,968$ 131,922,118$ 142,410,536$ 149,969,357$ Restricted 10,571,295 23,538,875 24,092,819 20,900,956 Unrestricted 58,750,650 42,470,823 43,978,309 50,109,776 Total Primary Government Net Position 187,912,913$ 197,931,816$ 210,481,664$ 220,980,089$ a The City implemented GASB 65 in fiscal year 2013. Prior year information has not been restated as a result of this change in accounting principle. b The City implemented GASB 68 in fiscal year 2015. Prior year information has not been restated as a result of this change in accounting principle. c The City implemented GASB 75 in fiscal year 2018. Prior year information has not been restated as a result of this change in accounting principle. Fiscal Year CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NET POSITION BY COMPONENT (CONTINUED) LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (ACCRUAL BASIS OF ACCOUNTING) (107) 2014 2015b 2016 2017 2018c 2019 85,708,114$ 85,838,618$ 93,247,973$ 96,149,011$ 107,133,225$ 110,670,335$ 18,268,724 16,925,171 20,892,680 22,840,869 25,017,586 36,999,647 31,316,605 21,957,830 22,146,168 26,412,441 31,277,308 27,680,337 135,293,443$ 124,721,619$ 136,286,821$ 145,402,321$ 163,428,119$ 175,350,319$ 75,803,672$ 83,395,794$ 85,158,869$ 82,338,560$ 81,980,815$ 80,452,583$ 619,295 793,664 804,393 1,338,276 1,360,336 1,360,336 21,176,026 16,405,405 17,300,872 22,443,806 27,285,949 32,045,171 97,598,993$ 100,594,863$ 103,264,134$ 106,120,642$ 110,627,100$ 113,858,090$ 161,511,786$ 169,234,412$ 178,406,842$ 178,487,571$ 189,114,040$ 191,122,918$ 18,888,019 17,718,835 21,697,073 24,179,145 26,377,922 38,359,983 52,492,631 38,363,235 39,447,040 48,856,247 58,563,257 59,725,508 232,892,436$ 225,316,482$ 239,550,955$ 251,522,963$ 274,055,219$ 289,208,409$ Fiscal Year CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CHANGES IN NET POSITION LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (ACCRUAL BASIS OF ACCOUNTING) (108) 2010 2011 2012 2013a EXPENSES Governmental Activities: General Government 6,961,082$ 7,013,231$ 12,598,979$ 8,256,261$ Public Safety 15,543,594 16,024,575 16,598,423 17,117,693 Public Works 8,558,363 9,193,336 9,437,285 11,502,250 Parks 5,608,758 5,540,585 5,904,724 6,132,709 Interest on Long-Term Debt 2,528,424 2,339,370 2,222,392 2,024,749 Total Governmental Activities Expenses 39,200,221 40,111,097 46,761,803 45,033,662 Business-Type Activities: Utilities 11,848,538 12,130,685 12,610,875 13,748,186 Liquor 11,594,643 11,727,106 11,740,744 12,261,413 Aquatic Center 769,608 718,027 866,944 822,932 Golf Course 3,561,573 3,390,949 3,293,192 3,199,815 Arena 1,527,536 1,689,001 2,182,200 2,272,510 Community Activity Centers 2,965,243 2,998,915 2,842,139 2,967,115 Total Business-Type Activities Expenses 32,267,141 32,654,683 33,536,094 35,271,971 Total Primary Government Expenses 71,467,362$ 72,765,780$ 80,297,897$ 80,305,633$ PROGRAM REVENUES Governmental Activities: Charges for Services: General Government 946,107$ 969,745$ 1,142,984$ 1,259,908$ Public Safety 5,448,505 5,988,485 6,549,929 7,410,755 Other Activities 723,559 775,676 913,864 846,999 Operating Grants and Contributions 1,162,411 1,392,892 1,685,026 2,283,007 Capital Grants and Contributions 13,325,431 5,770,912 9,137,011 6,372,735 Total Governmental Activities Program Revenues 21,606,013 14,897,710 19,428,814 18,173,404 Business-Type Activities: Charges for Services: Utilities 15,036,016 15,873,937 17,729,589 17,831,225 Liquor 12,857,064 13,172,484 13,230,941 13,711,557 Aquatic Center 945,529 913,383 1,001,946 928,055 Golf Course 3,443,204 3,285,741 3,225,591 2,711,743 Arena 1,301,506 1,315,435 1,452,435 1,942,971 Community Activity Centers 2,194,476 2,331,136 2,399,090 2,625,633 Operating Grants and Contributions 373,230 135,428 1,042,195 516,242 Capital Grants and Contributions - - - - Total Business-Type Activities Program Revenues 36,151,025 37,027,544 40,081,787 40,267,426 Total Primary Government Program Revenues 57,757,038$ 51,925,254$ 59,510,601$ 58,440,830$ NET (EXPENSE) REVENUE Governmental Activities (17,594,208)$ (25,213,387)$ (27,332,989)$ (26,860,258)$ Business-Type Activities 3,883,884 4,372,861 6,545,693 4,995,455 Total Primary Government Net Expense (13,710,324)$ (20,840,526)$ (20,787,296)$ (21,864,803)$ GENERAL REVENUES AND OTHER CHANGES IN NET POSITION Governmental Activities: Property Taxes 25,122,113$ 25,040,871$ 25,884,662$ 26,894,161$ Tax Increment Collections 4,488,073 4,083,345 3,536,935 3,981,938 Franchise Taxes 692,288 722,160 815,530 1,891,967 Lodging Taxes - - - - Unrestricted Investment Earnings 474,444 601,250 341,986 (96,390) Gain on Disposal of Capital Assets 35,594 131,365 - 16,654 Insurance Recovery - - - 816,654 Transfers 765,994 694,206 696,935 133,907 Total Governmental Activities 31,578,506 31,273,197 31,276,048 33,638,891 Business-Type Activities: Property Taxes - - - - Unrestricted Investment Earnings 205,965 280,438 113,177 (77,848) Gain (Loss) on Disposal of Capital Assets 26,574 - 2,644,854 17,587 Transfers (765,994) (694,206) (696,935) (133,907) Total Business-Type Activities (533,455) (413,768) 2,061,096 (194,168) Total Primary Government 31,045,051$ 30,859,429$ 33,337,144$ 33,444,723$ CHANGE IN NET POSITION Governmental Activities 13,984,298$ 6,059,810$ 3,943,059$ 6,778,633$ Business-Type Activities 3,350,429 3,959,093 8,606,789 4,801,287 Total Primary Government 17,334,727$ 10,018,903$ 12,549,848$ 11,579,920$ a The City implemented GASB 65 in fiscal year 2013. Prior year information has not been restated as a result of this change in accounting principle. b The City completed a major departmental reorganization in 2014, moving parks maintenance activities from parks to public works. Prior year information has not been modified as a result of this change. c The City implemented GASB 68 in fiscal year 2015. Prior year information has not been restated as a result of this change in accounting principle. d The City completed a major departmental reorganization in 2018, moving parks maintenance activities from public works to parks. The City also implemented GASB 75 in fiscal year 2018. Prior year information has not been restated as a result of either change. Fiscal Year CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CHANGES IN NET POSITION (CONTINUED) LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (ACCRUAL BASIS OF ACCOUNTING) (109) 2014b 2015c 2016 2017 2018d 2019 8,522,319$ 8,518,236$ 9,587,567$ 9,164,272$ 10,964,266$ 11,252,538$ 18,145,498 19,507,770 20,243,209 21,815,101 20,971,184 27,496,563 15,553,852 15,284,777 19,444,472 17,750,505 14,170,463 10,979,180 3,330,781 3,385,367 3,822,716 4,222,431 7,235,405 7,554,919 1,989,863 2,180,678 2,133,474 1,996,354 1,726,901 1,999,318 47,542,313 48,876,828 55,231,438 54,948,663 55,068,219 59,282,518 14,207,197 14,963,304 16,780,474 17,361,659 18,045,516 19,303,212 12,393,218 11,818,602 12,130,254 12,007,885 11,995,159 11,970,986 827,485 872,960 915,560 1,015,328 996,671 979,376 3,342,544 3,409,343 3,041,169 3,469,121 2,464,563 4,009,097 2,375,173 2,642,097 2,842,660 2,961,787 2,996,844 2,982,674 2,975,782 3,436,325 3,853,091 4,095,309 4,096,452 4,286,773 36,121,399 37,142,631 39,563,208 40,911,089 40,595,205 43,532,118 83,663,712$ 86,019,459$ 94,794,646$ 95,859,752$ 95,663,424$ 102,814,636$ 1,529,555$ 1,322,430$ 1,453,009$ 1,142,120$ 2,395,535$ 1,204,947$ 8,102,352 8,683,465 8,996,046 9,627,122 9,978,816 9,747,031 960,261 1,158,207 1,289,770 1,288,452 1,202,732 1,265,918 1,578,538 3,122,178 2,751,495 2,194,336 4,028,247 4,271,243 8,244,695 10,044,077 15,252,861 9,775,184 6,695,172 6,625,040 20,415,401 24,330,357 29,743,181 24,027,214 24,300,502 23,114,179 17,550,802 19,335,443 19,505,905 21,361,972 22,697,468 21,875,655 13,515,168 12,462,387 12,937,092 12,991,764 13,401,754 13,094,407 918,412 971,936 956,068 962,857 997,727 996,778 3,229,348 2,857,190 2,809,702 1,254,412 1,396,173 3,395,815 2,092,567 2,316,853 2,314,892 2,508,192 2,629,945 2,516,629 2,583,257 3,119,789 3,190,775 3,348,628 3,303,278 3,240,000 428,416 595,141 445,464 179,086 545,682 44,953 - - - 904,201 - 692,281 40,317,970 41,658,739 42,159,898 43,511,112 44,972,027 45,856,518 60,733,371$ 65,989,096$ 71,903,079$ 67,538,326$ 69,272,529$ 68,970,697$ (27,126,912)$ (24,546,471)$ (25,488,257)$ (30,921,449)$ (30,767,717)$ (36,168,339)$ 4,196,571 4,516,108 2,596,690 2,600,023 4,376,822 2,324,400 (22,930,341)$ (20,030,363)$ (22,891,567)$ (28,321,426)$ (26,390,895)$ (33,843,939)$ 27,062,224$ 29,632,072$ 31,396,421$ 33,665,029$ 35,616,432$ 37,133,269$ 5,052,705 1,792,896 2,779,097 3,422,898 4,997,706 5,447,108 2,055,396 2,089,038 2,346,423 2,408,884 2,559,443 2,881,726 11,301 22,716 22,624 21,006 25,298 24,119 440,051 195,620 344,277 514,073 901,405 2,037,306 29,037 41,900 65,044 - 5,032,815 408,659 - - - - - - (9,605,225) (2,230,966) 99,573 5,059 305,428 158,352 25,045,489 31,543,276 37,053,459 40,036,949 49,438,527 48,090,539 - - - - - - 191,974 91,907 136,208 254,990 481,754 1,064,942 - 39,427 35,946 6,554 - - 9,605,225 2,230,966 (99,573) (5,059) (305,428) (158,352) 9,797,199 2,362,300 72,581 256,485 176,326 906,590 34,842,688$ 33,905,576$ 37,126,040$ 40,293,434$ 49,614,853$ 48,997,129$ (2,081,423)$ 6,996,805$ 11,565,202$ 9,115,500$ 18,670,810$ 11,922,200$ 13,993,770 6,878,408 2,669,271 2,856,508 4,553,148 3,230,990 11,912,347$ 13,875,213$ 14,234,473$ 11,972,008$ 23,223,958$ 15,153,190$ Fiscal Year CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA FUND BALANCES OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (MODIFIED ACCRUAL BASIS OF ACCOUNTING) (110) 2010 2011b 2012 2013 GENERAL FUND Reserved 10,258$ -$ -$ -$ Unreserved 12,868,952 - - - Nonspendable - 10,871 413,200 13,322 Restricted - 178,295 880,395 185,395 Assigned - 1,539,286 1,643,077 1,559,461 Unassigned - 11,744,764 11,902,462 12,573,457 Total General Fund 12,879,210$ 13,473,216$ 14,839,134$ 14,331,635$ ALL OTHER GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS Reserved 9,460,834$ -$ -$ -$ Unreserved, Reported in: Special Revenue Funds 15,333,460 - - - Capital Projects Funds 12,150,968 - - - Restricted, Reported in: Special Revenue Funds - 17,178,857 13,185,962 13,040,516 Debt Service Funds - 8,068,183 9,704,408 6,246,769 Construction Funds - 2,087,548 2,759,463 3,318,947 Assigned, Reported in: Capital Projects Funds - 8,098,935 7,159,890 8,354,268 Unassigned, Reported in: Special Revenue Funds - - - - Total all Other Governmental Funds 36,945,262$ 35,433,523$ 32,809,723$ 30,960,500$ a The substantial decrease in general fund unreserved fund balance in 2009 is due to the transfer of the equipment replacement program to the construction fund. The substantial increase in other governmental funds reserved fund balance in 2009 is due to unspent bond proceeds related to the new Public Works Facility, which is under construction. b The City implemented GASB Statement No. 54, "Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions" in 2011. The City did not apply the statement retroactively. c The substantial increase in other governmental funds restricted fund balance is due to unspent bond proceeds related to the current refunding that took place on February 1 of the following year. Fiscal Year CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA FUND BALANCES OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS (CONTINUED) LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (MODIFIED ACCRUAL BASIS OF ACCOUNTING) (111) 2014c 2015 2016c 2017c 2018 2019 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ - - - - - - 240,291 529,513 27,643 13,124 - 28,403 757,673 417,673 927,673 961,133 961,133 58,086 1,566,329 1,547,398 1,612,240 1,739,079 2,105,741 2,093,760 11,429,444 11,825,799 14,624,755 15,656,518 16,812,851 16,411,412 13,993,737$ 14,320,383$ 17,192,311$ 18,369,854$ 19,879,725$ 18,591,661$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ - - - - - - - - - - - - 9,719,309 9,405,757 12,673,995 14,453,556 14,755,259 14,723,598 12,678,291 7,134,575 11,187,468 17,000,806 7,871,858 10,771,427 6,598,832 551,132 209,510 78,702 30,072 - 7,046,610 13,127,881 13,109,438 15,710,621 19,726,343 21,927,249 - - (190,845) - - - 36,043,042$ 30,219,345$ 36,989,566$ 47,243,685$ 42,383,532$ 47,422,274$ Fiscal Year CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (MODIFIED ACCRUAL BASIS OF ACCOUNTING) (112) 2010 2011 2012 2013 REVENUES General Property Taxes 25,122,113$ 24,972,166$ 25,838,422$ 26,891,756$ Tax Increment Collections 4,488,073 4,083,345 3,536,935 3,981,938 Franchise Taxes 692,288 722,160 815,530 1,891,967 Lodging Fees - - - - Special Assessments 6,746,186 4,502,112 4,975,641 4,884,510 License and Permits 2,410,314 2,724,763 3,155,351 4,150,512 Intergovernmental 3,726,849 3,059,964 2,032,966 2,509,166 Charges for Services 3,014,894 3,181,961 3,708,482 3,667,612 Fines and Forfeitures 1,203,767 1,243,426 1,195,054 1,109,710 Investment Income 474,444 601,250 341,986 (96,390) Rental of Property 426,517 539,091 506,276 518,862 Parkland Dedication - - 702,100 - Other Revenues 413,400 156,231 240,841 278,607 Total Revenues 48,718,845 45,786,469 47,049,584 49,788,250 EXPENDITURES General Government 6,523,398 5,739,481 6,624,573 7,351,556 Public Safety 14,177,387 14,668,772 14,985,068 15,859,622 Public Works 5,898,023 6,000,539 6,277,506 7,018,614 Parks 3,524,950 3,633,922 3,852,260 3,915,568 Capital Outlay 13,505,827 14,235,496 13,622,443 10,690,207 Debt Service: Principal 2,975,000 4,480,000 6,620,000 14,531,375 Interest and Other Charges 2,584,006 2,278,068 2,292,394 2,270,259 Total Expenditures 49,188,591 51,036,278 54,274,244 61,637,201 REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES (469,746) (5,249,809) (7,224,660) (11,848,951) OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) Utility Contributions from Other Funds - - - - Transfers In 2,903,762 5,615,669 4,495,940 3,472,964 Transfers Out (2,137,768) (4,921,463) (3,799,005) (3,339,057) Sale of Capital Assets 134,329 209,773 94,975 61,642 Insurance Recovery - - - 816,654 Loans Issued - - - - Bonds Issued 2,535,000 3,320,000 2,748,720 2,555,000 Refunding Bonds Issued 8,285,000 - 1,990,000 5,710,000 Premium on Bonds Issued 898,658 108,097 436,148 275,360 Discount on Bonds Issued - - - (60,334) Payment to Refunding Escrow (9,094,822) - - - Total Other Financing Sources (Uses) 3,524,159 4,332,076 5,966,778 9,492,229 NET CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES 3,054,413$ (917,733)$ (1,257,882)$ (2,356,722)$ Debt Service as a Percentage of Fiscal Year CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS (CONTINUED) LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (MODIFIED ACCRUAL BASIS OF ACCOUNTING) (113) 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 26,988,493$ 29,535,270$ 31,354,023$ 33,696,550$ 35,613,883$ 37,093,074$ 5,052,705 1,792,896 2,779,097 3,422,898 4,997,706 5,447,108 2,055,396 2,089,038 2,346,423 2,408,884 2,559,443 2,881,726 11,301 22,716 22,624 21,006 25,298 24,119 4,606,010 4,132,128 5,276,194 5,330,766 4,747,205 4,741,557 4,583,183 4,907,364 5,268,519 5,403,222 5,912,757 5,183,754 3,961,509 6,093,966 5,775,114 3,687,262 5,124,573 3,687,620 4,270,720 4,414,991 4,689,389 4,917,173 4,898,548 5,431,941 1,163,907 1,195,271 1,016,817 1,135,986 1,122,426 1,097,122 440,051 195,314 344,344 512,448 889,550 1,989,881 546,874 416,522 514,955 459,099 632,011 487,797 757,278 800,000 1,250,000 33,460 - - 78,775 361,425 2,599,830 761,281 990,277 600,905 54,516,202 55,956,901 63,237,329 61,790,035 67,513,677 68,666,604 7,625,826 6,337,944 6,815,725 7,065,729 8,630,290 8,973,194 16,647,821 17,537,528 18,554,507 19,233,386 20,323,076 21,701,254 10,201,335 10,578,472 10,474,008 11,524,896 8,682,928 8,998,768 1,341,884 1,416,858 1,529,384 1,695,397 5,202,962 5,453,778 19,883,144 19,912,565 16,787,575 11,053,212 19,752,836 18,558,023 4,096,375 13,276,375 5,246,375 5,496,375 5,523,369 5,778,476 1,923,647 2,375,613 2,360,827 2,359,551 2,099,594 1,923,526 61,720,032 71,435,355 61,768,401 58,428,546 70,215,055 71,387,019 (7,203,830) (15,478,454) 1,468,928 3,361,489 (2,701,378) (2,720,415) - - - - 37,978 115,494 1,404,975 3,232,770 3,504,542 5,130,405 5,464,771 6,738,864 (11,010,200) (6,472,066) (3,404,969) (5,057,263) (5,139,771) (6,604,736) 70,603 78,509 65,044 84,388 6,201,630 1,172,391 - 167,167 - - - - - - - - - 750,000 16,155,000 9,040,000 3,940,000 1,995,000 2,210,000 5,000,000 5,180,000 3,490,000 3,635,000 8,955,000 - - 327,987 492,838 450,409 798,791 74,787 799,080 (179,891) (47,815) (16,805) (51,148) (18,299) - - - - (3,785,000) (9,480,000) - 11,948,474 9,981,403 8,173,221 8,070,173 (648,904) 7,971,093 4,744,644$ (5,497,051)$ 9,642,149$ 11,431,662$ (3,350,282)$ 5,250,678$ Fiscal Year CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ASSESSED VALUE, ACTUAL VALUE, AND TAX CAPACITY OF TAXABLE PROPERTY LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (114) City Tax City Used Adjusted Capacity Referendum Estimated Limited Taxable Total for Rate Net Rate Rate 9,960,341$ 9,960,341$ 9,949,807$ 120,817$ 104,914$ 108,452$ 22.972% 0.00606% 2.501$ 9,441,688 9,441,688 9,431,941 113,981 98,897 102,319 24.660% 0.00654% 2.672 9,179,305 9,179,305 9,025,565 109,013 94,811 97,879 26.247% 0.00667% 2.799 8,955,431 8,955,431 8,798,601 106,530 93,504 96,120 27.216% 0.00690% 2.921 9,065,550 9,065,550 8,911,695 108,069 93,607 96,156 27.920% 0.00695% 2.961 9,837,972 9,837,972 9,701,677 117,907 106,662 109,203 26.605% 0.00631% 2.953 10,420,339 10,420,339 10,296,342 125,664 112,491 115,128 27.137% 0.00550% 2.998 10,902,621 10,902,621 10,785,198 132,180 116,854 119,756 28.271% 0.00000% 3.105 11,655,318 11,655,318 11,547,520 141,934 125,242 128,453 27.849% 0.00000% 3.069 12,370,205 12,370,205 12,271,673 151,279 132,609 136,083 27.499% 0.00000% 3.025 Source: Hennepin County Taxpayer Services. a Property in the City is assessed annually. Assessed value is equal to market value, although taxable value may be different, as shown. The City receives reports from Hennepin County showing total market value, but not separated by property classification. b This value is estimated by the City Finance Department by taking City taxes as a rate of estimated market value (rate per $1,000 of assessed value). The property tax system in Minnesota uses a tax capacity system whereby each parcel is assigned a tax capacity based on taxable value and class. In Minnesota, local taxes are usually expressed as a percentage of this calculated tax capacity (see column titled "City Tax Capacity Rate"). Therefore, this rate is only theoretical and shown for comparative purposes only. 2019 2018 Year 2016 2017 Estimated Rate b Market Value (In Thousands) a Tax Capacity (In Thousands) 2015 Fiscal Direct 2013 2014 2010 2011 2012 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING TAX CAPACITY RATES LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (115) Total Basic Debt HRA Total Tax Direct and Rate Rate Rate Capacity RMV Hennepin Tax Cap. RMV Other Overlap 20.004% 2.968% 0.000% 22.972% 0.006% 42.640% 18.746% 0.194% 9.431% 93.789% 21.548% 3.112% 0.000% 24.660% 0.007% 45.840% 21.786% 0.196% 10.489% 102.775% 23.131% 3.116% 0.000% 26.247% 0.007% 48.231% 27.565% 0.215% 10.911% 112.954% 23.762% 3.454% 0.000% 27.216% 0.007% 49.461% 27.762% 0.217% 11.483% 115.922% 24.458% 3.462% 0.000% 27.920% 0.007% 49.959% 27.556% 0.223% 12.051% 117.486% 22.477% 4.128% 0.000% 26.605% 0.006% 46.398% 27.344% 0.215% 11.100% 111.447% 23.223% 3.914% 0.000% 27.137% 0.006% 45.356% 34.898% 0.201% 11.254% 118.645% 24.348% 3.841% 0.082% 28.271% 0.000% 44.087% 34.798% 0.188% 11.057% 118.213% 24.187% 3.564% 0.098% 27.849% 0.000% 42.808% 30.972% 0.222% 10.667% 112.296% 23.992% 3.388% 0.119% 27.499% 0.000% 41.861% 30.589% 0.210% 9.714% 109.663% Source: Hennepin County Taxpayer Services. RMV: Referendum Market Value Geographic boundaries for overlapping district are not identical to the City's boundaries. City boundaries contain six different school districts but only ISD #273 is shown here. Other districts include Mosquito Control, Met Council, Metro Transit, Hennepin Parks, Park Museum and Regional Railroad Authority. In addition, there are two watershed districts in the City, Nine Mile Creek and Minnehaha Creek, and rates for Nine Mile are included in Other. Total rates do not include RMV rates. 2019 City Rates Overlapping Rates ISD #273 EdinaFiscal Year 2018 2013 2014 2010 2011 2012 2015 2016 2017 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PRINCIPAL PROPERTY TAX PAYERS CURRENT YEAR AND NINE YEARS AGO (116) Percentage Percentage of Total of Total Tax Capacity Rank Capacity Tax Capacity Rank Capacity Southdale Shopping Center 2,903,016$ 1 1.92% 2,988,940$ 1 2.47% Galleria Shopping Center 2,704,861 2 1.79% 1,188,800 2 0.98% Southdale Medical Building 1,421,442 3 0.94% 620,285 5 0.51% Centennial Lakes Retail 1,132,288 4 0.75% 679,250 4 0.56% Southdale Office Center 1,002,690 5 0.66% 782,790 3 0.65% Onyx Apartments 850,353 6 0.56% DNA DNA DNA Centennial Lakes Phase V 779,680 7 0.52% 527,364 7 0.44% Centennial Lakes Phase IV 764,580 8 0.51% 517,146 8 0.43% One Southdale Place Apartments 723,288 9 0.48% DNA DNA DNA 7700 France 643,594 10 0.43% DNA DNA DNA National Car DNA DNA 536,870 6 0.44% Macy's Department Stores DNA DNA 439,250 9 0.36% Target DNA DNA 344,580 10 0.29% Totals 12,925,792$ 8.54% 8,625,275$ 7.14% Source: City of Edina Assessing Office DNA: Data is not available 20102019 Taxpayer CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PROPERTY TAX LEVIES AND COLLECTIONS LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (117) Total Collections in Tax Percentage Subsequent Percentage Levy Amount of Levy Years Amount of Levy 25,492,973$ 24,904,346$ 97.69% (310,913)$ 24,593,433$ 96.47% 25,786,217 25,067,625 97.21% (202,079) 24,865,546 96.43% 26,248,226 25,983,685 98.99% (132,633) 25,851,052 98.49% 26,747,384 26,545,984 99.25% (201,500) 26,344,484 98.49% 27,454,872 27,326,092 99.53% (44,905) 27,281,187 99.37% 29,700,010 29,497,362 99.32% (82,876) 29,414,486 99.04% 31,799,123 31,383,415 98.69% 39,772 31,423,187 98.82% 33,822,369 33,645,085 99.48% (64,661) 33,580,424 99.28% 35,784,777 35,551,096 99.35% (48,404) 35,502,692 99.21% 37,431,021 37,104,274 99.13% - 37,104,274 99.13% Source: Hennepin County Taxpayer Services. 2019 Total Collections to Date Taxes Payable 2013 2014 2018 2016 2015 2017 Collected within the Fiscal Year of the Levy 2012 2010 2011 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA RATIOS OF OUTSTANDING DEBT BY TYPE LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER CAPITA) (118) General Public Tax Permanent EEEP Rec. Utility Total Percentage Obligation Project Increment Improvement Revenue Facility Revenue Primary of Personal Per Debt Revenue Bonds Revolving Bonds Bonds Bonds Government Income a Capita a 32,595$ 13,282$ 3,314$ 16,254$ -$ 4,059$ 19,507$ 89,011$ 3.39% 1,857$ 30,417 13,077 2,477 18,353 - 3,569 28,800 96,693 3.56% 2,004 28,318 11,787 550 22,067 74 5,952 33,160 101,908 3.21% 2,087 32,035 5,627 - 18,889 62 6,540 29,635 92,788 3.14% 1,885 30,806 21,445 - 21,554 51 6,249 39,633 119,738 3.84% 2,382 27,225 21,300 - 24,776 40 8,055 32,575 113,971 3.53% 2,245 28,560 20,395 - 26,874 28 7,677 36,691 120,225 3.68% 2,321 31,748 19,485 - 26,772 17 16,946 38,661 133,629 3.75% 2,545 20,115 18,434 - 26,415 13 14,696 36,768 116,441 3.35% 2,216 21,211 17,495 - 26,323 - 12,423 39,230 116,682 3.14% 2,190 Details regarding the City's outstanding debt may be found in the notes to the financial statements. All figures are presented net of related premiums, discounts, and adjustments if applicable. a Population and personal income data from U.S. Census Bureau/Metropolitan Council found on page 123. 2019 Business-Type Activities Year Fiscal 2018 2010 2011 2012 2015 2016 2013 2014 2017 Governmental Activities CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA RATIOS OF GENERAL BONDED DEBT OUTSTANDING LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER CAPITA) (119) Less: Amounts Available Percentage of General Obligation Debt a in Debt Service Fund b Total Property Value c Per Capita d 31,800$ 6,105$ 25,695$ 0.26% 536$ 29,700 8,068 21,632 0.23% 448 27,680 9,704 17,976 0.20% 368 31,390 6,247 25,143 0.28% 511 30,200 12,678 17,522 0.19% 349 26,710 7,135 19,575 0.20% 386 27,935 11,187 16,748 0.16% 323 30,630 17,001 13,629 0.13% 260 19,155 7,872 11,283 0.10% 215 19,905 8,342 11,563 0.09% 217 Details regarding the City's outstanding debt may be found in the notes to the financial statements. a Presented net of related premiums, discounts, and adjustments. b This is the amount restricted for debt service principal payments. c See statistical schedule titled "Assessed Value, Actual Value and Tax Capacity of Taxable Property" for estimated property value data. d Population from U.S. Census Bureau/Metropolitan Council found on page 123. 2019 Year Fiscal 2013 2018 2016 2015 2014 2010 2011 2012 2017 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES DEBT DECEMBER 31, 2019 (120) Net General Percentage Obligation Bonded Applicable City Share Debt Outstanding in City a of Debt Overlapping Debt: Hennepin County 983,232,996$ 7.09% 69,711,219$ Hennepin Suburban Park District 39,123,902 10.00% 3,912,390 Hennepin Regional Rail Authority 91,599,372 7.09% 6,494,395 School Districts: ISD No. 273 (Edina) 167,312,880 98.62% 165,003,962 ISD No. 270 (Hopkins) 164,359,000 7.85% 12,902,182 ISD No. 271 (Bloomington) 84,955,424 0.02% 16,991 ISD No. 272 (Eden Prairie) 92,448,017 0.97% 896,746 ISD No. 280 (Richfield) 143,931,694 28.44% 40,934,174 ISD No. 283 (St. Louis Park) 137,122,694 0.01% 13,712 Metro Council 142,583,705 3.60% 5,133,013 Total Overlapping Debt 2,046,669,684 305,018,784 City of Edina 65,028,601 100.00% 65,028,601 Total Overlapping and Direct Debt 2,111,698,285$ 370,047,385$ Ratio of Debt Per Capita (52,535 Population) 7,044$ Ratio of Debt to Estimated Market Valuation of $12,370,204,900 2.99% Source: Hennepin County Taxpayer Services a The percentage of overlapping debt applicable is estimated using tax capacity. Applicable percentages were estimated by determining the portion of another governmental unit's tax capacity that is within the City's boundaries and dividing it by each unit's total tax capacity. Direct Debt: Debt Ratios: CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA LEGAL DEBT MARGIN INFORMATION LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) (121) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Debt Limit 298,494$ 282,958$ 270,767$ 263,958$ 267,351$ 291,050$ 308,890$ 323,556$ 346,426$ 368,150$ Total Net Debt Applicable to Limit 45,170 42,860 39,545 37,030 51,760 48,000 48,325 50,115 37,595 37,265 Legal Debt Margin 253,324$ 240,098$ 231,222$ 226,928$ 215,591$ 243,050$ 260,565$ 273,441$ 308,831$ 330,885$ Total Net Debt Applicable to the Limit as a Percentage of Debt Limit 15.13% 15.15% 14.60% 14.03% 19.36% 16.49% 15.64% 15.49% 10.85% 10.12% Market Value (After Fiscal Disparities) 12,271,672,648$ Debt Limit (3% of Market Value) 368,150,179 Debt Applicable to Limit: General Obligation Bonds 19,905,000 Public Project Revenue Bonds 17,360,000 Total Debt Applicable to Limit 37,265,000 Legal Debt Margin 330,885,179$ Fiscal Year Legal Debt Margin Calculation for Fiscal Year 2019 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PLEDGED REVENUE COVERAGE LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (122) Less: Operating Net Available Revenue Expenses Revenue Principal Interest Total Coverage Public Project Revenue Bonds (Annual Appropriation Lease Revenue) 2010 1,421,354$ -$ 1,421,354$ 9,280,000$ 901,535$ 10,181,535$ 0.14 2011 1,346,294 - 1,346,294 210,000 574,681 784,681 1.72 2012 1,362,444 - 1,362,444 1,295,000 548,691 1,843,691 0.74 2013 1,346,294 - 1,346,294 6,225,000 589,734 6,814,734 0.20 2014 1,356,844 - 1,356,844 235,000 223,754 458,754 2.96 2015 2,521,840 - 2,521,840 3,760,000 729,879 4,489,879 0.56 2016 2,499,521 - 2,499,521 900,000 654,473 1,554,473 1.61 2017 2,496,500 - 2,496,500 905,000 633,527 1,538,527 1.62 2018 2,507,700 - 2,507,700 1,045,000 607,148 1,652,148 1.52 2019 2,510,900 - 2,510,900 1,080,000 574,566 1,654,566 1.52 Tax Increment Bonds 2010 4,488,073 - 4,488,073 805,000 125,820 930,820 4.82 2011 4,083,345 - 4,083,345 840,000 94,359 934,359 4.37 2012 3,536,935 - 3,536,935 1,930,000 48,445 1,978,445 1.79 2013 3,981,939 - 3,981,939 550,000 9,350 559,350 7.12 2014 5,052,705 - 5,052,705 - - - - 2015 1,792,896 - 1,792,896 - - - - 2016 2,779,097 - 2,779,097 - - - - 2017 3,422,898 - 3,422,898 - - - - 2018 4,997,706 - 4,997,706 - - - - 2019 5,447,108 5,447,108 - - - - Permanent Improvement Revolving Bonds (Special Assessment) 2010 1,339,350 - 1,339,350 655,000 520,278 1,175,278 1.14 2011 2,466,395 - 2,466,395 1,330,000 524,964 1,854,964 1.33 2012 2,520,862 - 2,520,862 1,375,000 557,514 1,932,514 1.30 2013 2,837,227 - 2,837,227 5,745,000 567,551 6,312,551 0.45 2014 2,870,102 - 2,870,102 1,555,000 548,927 2,103,927 1.36 2015 3,732,374 - 3,732,374 6,015,000 503,029 6,518,029 0.57 2016 4,727,881 - 4,727,881 1,925,000 705,628 2,630,628 1.80 2017 4,746,414 - 4,746,414 2,105,000 745,783 2,850,783 1.66 2018 4,121,203 - 4,121,203 2,480,000 746,023 3,226,023 1.28 2019 4,097,625 - 4,097,625 2,630,000 745,697 3,375,697 1.21 Utility Bond 2010 15,034,881 11,119,053 3,915,828 2,185,000 768,160 2,953,160 1.33 2011 15,871,102 11,438,288 4,432,814 2,270,000 693,285 2,963,285 1.50 2012 17,723,103 11,811,468 5,911,635 2,360,000 811,990 3,171,990 1.86 2013 17,830,425 12,893,159 4,937,266 3,400,000 933,970 4,333,970 1.14 2014 17,548,883 13,443,940 4,104,943 3,670,000 884,075 4,554,075 0.90 2015 19,334,023 14,387,132 4,946,891 12,300,000 882,427 13,182,427 0.38 2016 19,472,645 16,222,211 3,250,434 4,925,000 814,238 5,739,238 0.57 2017 21,360,262 16,718,288 4,641,974 5,040,000 930,123 5,970,123 0.78 2018 22,757,745 17,411,983 5,345,762 4,980,000 1,049,101 6,029,101 0.89 2019 21,846,239 18,457,754 3,388,485 5,685,000 999,754 6,684,754 0.51 Recreational Facility Bonds 2010 5,690,239 5,822,861 (132,622) 415,000 100,926 515,926 (0.26) 2011 5,510,043 5,760,947 (250,904) 485,000 115,050 600,050 (0.42) 2012 5,679,972 6,240,222 (560,250) 520,000 105,000 625,000 (0.90) 2013 5,582,769 6,118,195 (535,426) 550,000 138,127 688,127 (0.78) 2014 6,239,445 6,358,030 (118,585) 290,000 176,197 466,197 (0.25) 2015 6,137,111 6,258,138 (121,027) 350,000 176,808 526,808 (0.23) 2016 6,080,529 6,593,312 (512,783) 375,000 231,285 606,285 (0.85) 2017 4,724,288 6,247,649 (1,523,361) 500,000 217,958 717,958 (2.12) 2018 5,019,374 6,069,584 (1,050,210) 2,197,000 494,192 2,691,192 (0.39) 2019 6,908,708 7,516,553 (607,845) 849,000 430,733 1,279,733 (0.47) Debt Service RequirementsFiscal Year CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC STATISTICS LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (123) Estimated Personal Per Capita High School Income Personal Graduation Unemployment Population (In thousands) Income Rate Rate 47,941 2,622,564$ 54,704$ 91.6% 5.56% 48,262 2,717,923 56,316 92.2% 5.25% 48,829 3,171,346 64,948 97.4% 4.56% 49,216 2,955,913 60,060 97.7% 3.98% 50,261 3,117,991 62,036 97.8% 3.10% 50,766 3,231,154 63,648 97.9% 2.82% 51,804 3,264,895 63,024 97.7% 3.08% 52,497 3,567,906 67,964 97.9% 2.83% 52,535 3,480,339 66,248 98.0% 2.26% 53,268 3,711,714 69,680 98.2% 2.63% Sources: Population data from U.S. Census Bureau/Metropolitan Council. 2019 is the most recent. Personal income and per capita income estimates based on MN Department of Employment and Economic Development Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages. 2017 is the most recent. High school graduation rate data from U.S. Census Bureau for all of Hennepin County. Unemployment rate data from State of Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development. 2019 2018 2015 2016 Fiscal Year 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2017 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PRINCIPAL EMPLOYERS CURRENT YEAR AND NINE YEARS AGO (124) Percentage Percentage of Total City of Total City Employees Rank Employment Employees Rank Employment Fairview Southdale Hospital 1,624 1 6.34% 1,000 1 4.67% Edina Public Schools ISD #273 1,341 2 5.23% 600 2 2.80% City of Edina 1,100 3 4.29% 280 4 1.31% BI Worldwide 500 4 1.95% DNA DNA DNA Minnesota Garage Door Experts 500 5 1.95% DNA DNA DNA Lund Food Holdings, Inc 500 6 1.95% DNA DNA DNA Regis Corporation 460 7 1.80% 250 10 DNA Dow Water & Process Solutions 375 8 1.46% DNA DNA DNA Target 375 9 1.46% 250 8 1.17% Spartan Nash 350 10 1.37% DNA DNA DNA Promenade Salon Concepts DNA DNA DNA 500 3 2.34% Phoenix Direct DNA DNA DNA 250 5 1.17% Design Studio of Gabberts DNA DNA DNA 250 6 1.17% Westin DNA DNA DNA 250 7 1.17% JC Penny Co. DNA DNA DNA 250 9 1.17% Totals 7,125 27.80% 3,880 17.26% Sources: 2018 data from ReferenceUSA, written and telephone survey (May 2018) done by Ehlers, and the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development. 2009 data from previous CAFR. DNA: Data is not available 20102019 Employer CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT CITY GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES BY FUNCTION LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (125) 2010 2011 2012 b 2013 b 2014 b 2015 2016 b 2017 b 2018 2019 Administration General Fund 9.25 9.25 6.85 5.85 4.85 4.85 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 HRA Fund - - - - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Liquor Fund 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 CAS Fund - - - - - - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Communications and Technology Services General Fund 3.00 3.50 4.65 5.15 6.15 6.15 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 Central Services 3.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 6.00 6.00 Community Development General Fund 10.85 10.85 10.85 10.85 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Engineering General Fund 8.50 8.50 10.50 12.00 10.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 12.00 12.00 PACS Fund - - - - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Utilities Fund - - - - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Finance General Fund 5.50 5.25 5.25 5.25 6.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 6.00 6.00 Utilities Fund 2.75 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Liquor Fund 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 - - - - - - Fire Protection General Fund 40.50 39.50 39.75 42.75 42.85 43.85 45.90 45.90 45.80 49.80 Utilities Fund 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 - - - - Human Resources General Fund - - 1.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 Parks and Recreation General Fund 23.20 23.20 23.20 24.40 23.65 23.65 25.05 25.05 25.30 25.30 Aquatic Center 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.60 0.60 0.70 0.70 Golf Course 13.00 11.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 8.05 8.05 9.00 9.00 Arena 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.85 4.85 6.25 6.25 Sports Dome - - - - - - 0.15 0.15 1.00 1.00 Art Center 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Edinborough Park 7.00 7.00 7.00 5.80 5.80 5.80 5.80 5.80 5.65 5.65 Centennial Lakes 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.05 5.05 Police Protection General Fund 73.65 71.15 71.65 70.65 72.50 70.50 72.55 72.55 76.55 76.55 Utilities Fund 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 Public Works General Fund 31.00 30.80 31.80 30.00 26.70 26.70 25.40 25.40 23.30 23.30 Construction Fund 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 Utilities Fund 15.25 14.45 13.95 13.75 15.20 15.20 16.85 16.85 18.65 18.65 Central Services 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 11.00 11.00 10.25 10.25 10.20 10.20 Other 1.00 - - - - - - - - - Total 280.00 274.00 278.00 281.00 285.00 285.00 287.00 287.00 297.00 301.00 Source: City of Edina 2018-2019 Budget a Full-time employee counts do not include Council members, part-time, contract or seasonal employees. In a typical year the City will employ an additional 700-800 people in these categories. b The City completed departmental reorganizations that are reflected on this chart between years 2012-2014 and 2016-2017. In some cases, data for years before the reorganization has been modified from what was originally reported to improve comparisons. Function Budgeted Full-Time Employees for Fiscal Year a CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA OPERATING INDICATORS BY FUNCTION LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (126) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 General Government Total City Employees 869 892 989 1,040 1,093 1,077 1,155 1,067 1,136 1,174 Votes Cast a 25,463 7,957 31,841 3,480 24,049 9,370 31,986 11,440 30,774 10,990 Public Works Asphalt Placed (Tons) 7,643 8,500 9,000 9,273 8,383 8,888 9,298 11,176 14,419 9,847 Concrete (cu. yds.) 503 558 667 560 396 670 897 708 868 963 Public Safety Crimes Reported 1,890 1,590 1,628 1,594 1,571 2,015 2,143 2,431 N/A N/A Fire Calls 910 960 858 893 926 1,251 1,276 1,220 1,321 1,600 Medical Calls 3,599 3,652 3,946 3,803 3,982 3,818 4,063 4,508 4,572 4,727 Central Services Vehicle Fixes 2,431 2,331 2,546 3,493 3,277 2,923 2,721 2,478 2,336 1,910 Utilities Daily Consumption b 6,790 6,909 7,613 6,652 6,489 6,308 6,047 5,950 6,101 5,394 Aquatic Center Attendance 86,654 77,696 139,909 91,340 92,200 128,523 108,609 89,318 88,342 83,499 Golf Course Total Rounds Played c 101,314 95,771 96,496 79,529 85,231 66,483 61,256 23,241 20,679 60,561 Source: Various City departments N Data not available a The City elections department runs general elections in even-numbered years and school district elections in odd-numbered years. Number of votes cast tend to vary between even and odd-numbered years and based on presidential election cycles. b Daily average of water pumped from city wells, measured in thousands of gallons. c 27-hole golf course was closed and reconstructed into an 18-hole championship course from 2017-2018 Function Fiscal Year CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CAPITAL ASSET STATISTICS BY FUNCTION LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (127) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Public Works Miles of Streets 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 City Parking Ramps 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Public Safety Fire Stations 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Parks and Recreation City Parks 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 Acreage of Parks 1,553 1,553 1,553 1,553 1,553 1,553 1,553 1,553 1,553 1,553 Park Buildings 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 Utilities Wells 19 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 Watermain Miles 199 199 199 199 199 199 199 199 199 199 Sanitary Sewer Miles 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 Sewer Connections 13,933 13,933 13,979 13,979 13,979 13,979 13,979 13,979 13,979 13,979 Arena Ice Sheets 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 Source: Various City departments Function Fiscal Year CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 EdinaMN.gov 952-826-0366 WEALTH ADVISORY | OUTSOURCING | AUDIT, TAX, AND CONSULTING Investment advisory services are offered through CliftonLarsonAllen Wealth Advisors, LLC, an SEC-registered investment advisor ©2019 CliftonLarsonAllen LLPCity of Edina, Minnesota Audit Presentation Year Ending December 31, 2019 Meeting Date Tuesday, June 16, 2020 ©2019 CliftonLarsonAllen LLPCreate Opportunities Audit Team Your audit team consisted of the following professionals with extensive experience in governmental accounting and auditing: –Michelle Hoffman –Principal (12 years) –John Lorenzini –Manager (12 years) –Lance Lauinger –Senior Associate (4 years) –Jack Stearns, Emma Casey, Charlie Hynes, Joe DeAngelis –(Associates) 2 ©2019 CliftonLarsonAllen LLPCreate Opportunities Audit Results •Audit Opinion: –The City has an unmodified (clean) opinion for the December 31, 2019 financial statement audit. •Internal Controls over Financial Reporting: –Material Weaknesses –None –Significant Deficiencies –None •Minnesota Legal Compliance: –No legal compliance findings 3 ©2019 CliftonLarsonAllen LLPCreate Opportunities Required Communications •No New Accounting Policies: –GASB 84 –Fiduciary Activities (delayed) •Accounting Estimates •Difficulties performing the audit (none) •Uncorrected misstatements (“passed adjustments”) •Corrected misstatements (“audit adjustments”) •Disagreements with management (none) 4 ©2019 CliftonLarsonAllen LLPCreate Opportunities General Fund Revenues, Expenditures and Fund Balance •Revenues -$1.9M (4.4%) over budget –Licenses and permits, Intergovernmental, charges for services (ambulance fees). •Expenditures -$36K (<1%) under budget •Assigned/Unassigned Fund Balance as a % of expenditures: –43% -12/31/19 –47% -12/31/18 General Fund Financial Results 5 Year $- $5,000,000 $10,000,000 $15,000,000 $20,000,000 $25,000,000 $30,000,000 $35,000,000 $40,000,000 $45,000,000 Assigned/Unassigned Fund Balance Total Expenditures Total Revenues 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 ©2019 CliftonLarsonAllen LLPCreate Opportunities Total General Fund Revenues •GF Revenues up $709k or 1.6%, as compared to 2018. •Property taxes approximately 68%. •Charges for services approximately 12%. •Licenses and permits approximately 11%. •Intergovernmental approximately 4% •Other 5% General Fund Financial Results 6 65%65%68%66%68% 13% 13% 13% 13%11% 4% 4% 3% 4%4% 12% 11% 12% 11%12% 6% 7% 4% 6%5% $- $5,000,000 $10,000,000 $15,000,000 $20,000,000 $25,000,000 $30,000,000 $35,000,000 $40,000,000 $45,000,000 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Taxes Licenses and Permits Intergovernmental Charges for Services Other Revenues ©2019 CliftonLarsonAllen LLPCreate Opportunities Total General Fund Expenditures •GF expenditures up $2.2M, or 5.5%, as compared to 2018 •Gen Govt. –13% •Comm. Dev. –4% •Police –30% •Fire –21% •Public Works –19% •Parks and Rec –13% General Fund Financial Results 7 13%13%12%13%13% 4%4%5%4%4% 29%30%30%30%30% 21%21%20% 20%21% 29%28%29%20% 19%4%4% 4%13% 13% $- $5,000,000 $10,000,000 $15,000,000 $20,000,000 $25,000,000 $30,000,000 $35,000,000 $40,000,000 $45,000,000 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 General Government Community Development Police Fire Public Works Parks ©2019 CliftonLarsonAllen LLPCreate Opportunities Utilities Fund Operations Financial Results 8 $- $2,000,000 $4,000,000 $6,000,000 $8,000,000 $10,000,000 $12,000,000 $14,000,000 $16,000,000 $18,000,000 $20,000,000 $22,000,000 $24,000,000 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Operating Revenues Operating Expenses (excludes depreciation) Depreciation Expense Operating Income (before depreciation) Operating Income ©2019 CliftonLarsonAllen LLPCreate Opportunities Golf Course Fund Operations Financial Results 9 $(1,500,000) $(1,000,000) $(500,000) $- $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000 $3,000,000 $3,500,000 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Operating Revenues Operating Expenses (excludes depreciation) Depreciation Expense Operating Income (before depreciation) Operating Income ©2019 CliftonLarsonAllen LLPCreate Opportunities Liquor Fund Operations Financial Results 10 $- $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $5,000,000 $6,000,000 $7,000,000 $8,000,000 $9,000,000 $10,000,000 $11,000,000 $12,000,000 $13,000,000 $14,000,000 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Gross Sales Cost of Sales Transfers Out Operating Income ©2019 CliftonLarsonAllen LLPCreate Opportunities Liquor Fund Operations (Continued) Financial Results 11 24.4% 25.6% 27.3% 28.2% 30.3% 25.3% 25.6%26.0% 26.5% 20.0% 22.5% 25.0% 27.5% 30.0% 32.5% 35.0% 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Gross Profit Percentage 7 County Metro Area (Offsale only) ©2019 CliftonLarsonAllen LLPCreate Opportunities Revenues Per Capita •Per capita revenues within $4 of prior year •Per capita revenues are $281 more than cities of comparable size. •Compared to other cities the size of Edina, largest differences is between intergovernmental and property taxes •Note that Edina has not received LGA. Financial Results 12 State-Wide Year December 31, 2018 2017 2018 2019 Population 20,000-100,000 52,497 52,535 53,268 Property Taxes 493$ 642$ 678$ 696$ Tax Increments 43 65 95 102 Franchise Fees and Other Taxes 50 46 49 55 Special Assessments 57 102 90 89 Licenses and Permits 47 103 113 97 Intergovernmental Revenues (Non-LGA)119 70 98 69 Intergovernmental Revenues (LGA)38 - - - Charges and Fees 112 94 93 102 Other 49 55 69 78 1,008$ 1,177$ 1,285$ 1,289$ City of Edina ©2019 CliftonLarsonAllen LLPCreate Opportunities Expenditures Per Capita •Current expenditures per capita increased $32 from 2018 •Per capita current expenditures are $161 more than other similar sized cities in the State. This is primarily due to general government and public safety departments. Financial Results 13 State-Wide Year December 31, 2018 2017 2018 2019 Population 20,000-100,000 52,497 52,535 53,268 Current: Administration 104$ 102$ 130$ 136$ Community Development 60 33 35 33 Police 207 220 233 241 Fire 87 146 154 167 Public Works 108 220 165 169 Parks and Recreation 104 32 99 102 Other 16 - - - Total Current 686$ 753$ 815$ 847$ Capital Outlay and Construction 303$ 211$ 376$ 348$ Debt Service:139$ 150$ 145$ 145$ Total Expenditures Per Capita 1,127$ 1,113$ 1,337$ 1,340$ City of Edina ©2019 CliftonLarsonAllen LLPCreate Opportunities •Other Financial Highlights –Financial statements and the required OSA Financial Reporting form will both be submitted to the required state agency before the deadline June 30, 2020. –Comprehensive Annual Financial Report will be submitted to the GFOA before the deadline June 30, 2020. Financial Results 14 ©2019 CliftonLarsonAllen LLPCreate Opportunities •Effective December 31, 2020: –Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 84 ◊Fiduciary Activities •Effective December 31, 2022: –Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 87 ◊Leases Emerging Issues 15 ©2019 CliftonLarsonAllen LLPCLAconnect.com Thank you to all for helping to get this audit completed timely and for allowing us to serve you! Contact Information: Michelle Hoffman, CPA 612-397-3269 Michelle.Hoffman@CLAconnect.com John Lorenzini, CPA 612-397-3268 John.Lorenzini@CLAconnect.com 16 Date: June 16, 2020 Agenda Item #: VII.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Concept for Improved Service and Safety of City Hall Reception Area Discussion CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None, discussion only. INTRODUCTION: Staff and BKV will present a concept for the reception area of City Hall that responds to the Feb. 19 Work Session discussion. ATTACHMENTS: Description Concept Date: June 16, 2020 Agenda Item #: VIII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Emily Bodeker, Assistant Planner Item Activity: Subject:PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No 2020-60 Variance Appeal for 4248 Alden Drive Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to close the public hearing at noon, June 15 and to continue action on the item to the July 21 City Council meeting. INTRODUCTION: Curt Brekke, the applicant, is requesting approval of an 18.6 foot front yard setback variance to the required front yard setback along Morningside Road for a new home. Better Together Edina Comments ATTACHMENTS: Description Planning Commission Staff Report, May 13, 2020 Resolution No. 2020-60 Applicant Submittal Aerial Map Required Setback Exhibit Surrounding Setbacks Exhibit Notice of Appeal Neighborhood Correspondence Submission The subject property, 4248 Alden Drive, is approximately 9,987 square feet (.23 acres) and is located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Alden Drive and Morningside Road. The existing home on the lot is a two-story home built in 1914. The applicant intends to tear down the existing structure and replace it with another two-story home. This lot is a 50’ x 200’ corner lot that requires two front yard setbacks. The required front yard setbacks are equal to the existing front yard setbacks for the homes on either side of the subject property along Morningside Road and Alden Drive. The existing house is setback 10.2 feet on the southside of the lot (along Morningside Road). The proposed setback on the southside of the property for the new home is 11.2 feet. The setback to Morningside Road is established by the home to the west, at 4110 Morningside, which has a 29.8-foot front setback. With the exception of the front yard setback along Morningside Road, the proposed new home meets all other zoning requirements. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Single Unit residential homes zoned R-1 and guided low-density residential Easterly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned R-1 and guided low-density residential. Southerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned R-1 and guided low-density residential. Westerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned R-1 and guided low-density residential. Existing Site Features There is an existing two-story home on the lot oriented towards Alden Drive that was built in 1914. May 13, 2020 PLANNING COMMISSION Emily Bodeker, Assistant City Planner B-20-10, A 18.6-foot front yard setback variance to the required front yard setback along Morningside Road at 4248 Alden Drive Information / Background: STAFF REPORT Page 2 Planning Guide Plan designation: Low-Density Residential Zoning: R-1, Single-Dwelling District Grading & Drainage The engineering department has reviewed the subject property for street and utility concerns, grading, stormwater, erosion and sediment control and for general adherence to relevant ordinance sections and has provided a memo. The site drains to private property, Morningside Road, and Alden Drive then ultimately to Weber pond. Compliance Table City Standard Proposed North Side – Side yard East Side – Front yard South – Front yard West Side – Rear yard 5 feet 42 feet 29.8 feet side 25 feet 6.8 feet 63.7 feet 11.2 feet* Roughly 50 feet Building Coverage 25% 24.2% *Requires a variance PRIMARY ISSUES & STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues • Is the proposed variance justified? Minnesota Statues and Section 36-98 of the Edina Zoning Ordinance require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The proposed variance will: 1. Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. “Practical difficulties” may include functional and aesthetic concerns. STAFF REPORT Page 3 The proposed use is permitted in the R-1 Single Dwelling Unit District and complies with zoning standards with the exception of the required front yard setback along Morningside Road. The lot has two required front yard setbacks which greatly affect the buildable area within the required setbacks due to the narrow lot. The practical difficulty is caused by the location of the home to the west, 4110 Morningside, which has a front setback of 29.8 feet. The front yard setback for the subject property is established by the location of that home. With a 29.8-foot setback to Morningside, and a 5-foot setback to the north lot line, there would only be a 15-foot buildable area for this lot. No reasonable sized home could be built on this lot that meets all the required setbacks. The proposed home is reasonably sized for the neighborhood and would be setback further from Morningside than the existing home. 2. There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-created? The circumstances are unique to the subject property and are not self-created. The width of the lot and the limitations of the required setbacks are not common to every similarly zoned property. 3. Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? Granting the variance will not alter the character of the neighborhood. The proposed front yard setback is similar to the existing setback of the new home. The proposed project complies with the other zoning requirements. Recommended Action: Approve an 18.6-foot front yard setback variance to the required front yard setback along Morningside Road at 4248 Alden Drive. Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposal meets the variance criteria. The practical difficulty is caused by the location of the home to the west, which has a front setback of 29.8 feet. The front yard setback for the subject property is established by the location of that home. 2. With a 29.8-foot setback to Morningside, and a 5-foot setback to the north lot line, there would be a 15.2-foot buildable area for this lot. No reasonable sized home could be built on this lot that meets all the required setbacks. 3. The proposed home is reasonably sized for the neighborhood and would be setback further from Morningside than the existing home. 4. Granting the variance will not alter the character of the neighborhood. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Survey date stamped March 10, 2020. STAFF REPORT Page 4 2. Elevations and plans received May 6, 2020. 3. Compliance with the conditions and comments listed in the engineering variance review memo dated March 20, 2020. RESOLUTION NO. 2020 - 60 APPROVING AN 18.6-FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE TO THE REQUIRED FRONT YARD SETBACK ALONG MORNINGSIDE ROAD AT 4248 ALDEN DRIVE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Curt Brekke. requested an 18.6-foot front yard setback variance to the required front yard setback along Morningside Road at 4248 Alden Drive. The purpose of the request is to tear down the existing home and construct a new home. The new home would be setback one foot further to Morningside Road than the existing home but would be larger. 1.02 On, May 13, 2020, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval of the request. Vote: 4 Ayes and 3 Nays. 1.03 The Planning Commission approval was appealed to the City Council on May 22, 2020. 1.04 The property is legally described as follows: The south 50’ of Lot 065 Morningside 1.06 On June 16, 2020, the City Council held a public hearing. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 2.02 There are practical difficulties in complying with this Section: 2.03 The proposal meets the variance criteria. The practical difficulty is caused by the location of the home to the west, which has a front setback of 29.8 feet. The front yard setback for the subject property is established by the location of that home. 2.04 With a 29.8-foot setback to Morningside Road, and a 5-foot setback to the north lot line, there would be a 15.2-foot buildable area for this lot. No reasonable sized home could be built on this lot that meets all the required setbacks. 2.05 The new home would be setback one foot further from Morningside Road than the existing home but would be larger. 2.06 The proposed home is reasonably sized for the neighborhood and would be setback further from Morningside than the existing home. 2.07 Granting the variance will not alter the character of the neighborhood. RESOLUTION NO. 2020- 60 Page 2 Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the requested 18.6-foot front yard setback variance along Morningside Road at 4248 Alden Drive. Approval is subject to the following conditions: • Subject to the survey date stamped March 10, 2020. • Elevations and plans received May 6, 2020. • Compliance with the conditions and comments listed in the engineering variance review memo dated March 20, 2020. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on July 21, 2020 ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 21, 2020, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2020. _________________________________ City Clerk 20 EXISTING CONDITION SURVEY FOR: C. ALAN HOMES LEGEND Fence Stone Retaining Wall • Sanitary Manhole O Storm Manhole ExisUng Contour • Set Rog Soil • Found Iron Monument • Polo and ‘1811r ?gin 14245 ILINN DR. FROM OfI90-916.0 PESO 1113017.943.6 914.1 9 43.0 914.1 a, x916.5 0917.0 b CD 14248 &DEN DR. FRONT onwo.917.6 PEAK 14901ff.9321.2 7 91 x915.2 011) LL 0 z 0 --J PLANNING DEPARTMENT NAR 1 0 2020 CITY OF EDINA 10 0 10 20 Pi 9, W. BROWN LAND SURVEYING. INC. 8030 CEDAR AVENUE ...SURE 228. 8L00MINOT014, MN 55425 Bus: (952) 8544055 FAS: 0352.18544268 EMAIL:INFORWBROWNLANDSURVEYING.COM SITE ADDRESS 4.48 Alden Dr. Edina. MN 55016 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The South 50 feet of Lot 65. MORNINOSIDE, Hennepin Coen ..Prinowom. BENCHMARK T N H not& south side of 3lomingsWe Rd. wit of Aldan Dr. Elevation =909.37. I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by nie or under my direct supervision and that I am o duly registered Land Surveyor under the low of the State of Minnesota. W. BROWN LAND SURVEYING, INC. DATED: 02-20-2020 WOOOROW A. BROWN. 9.1.5. MN REG 15230 REVISIONS JOB NO. 5CALE 22-20 DRAWN CME BOOK/PAGE 166/25 REFERENCE SHEET 1 of 1 WALL PRLAR 13.1 x914.5 00' .0 915.3 LLLLLLLLL LLLI_LL.L.LL 0915.2 LLL 1:1614311 RA110-1 LLLLL LLLLL LLLLL LLLtIx 0515.4 LX915.5_1_LL_ LLLLLLLLLLLLL LLULLLL LT.b...LLLL x915.4 LrECLL x914.7 x905.2 971.0 909.7 915. x x915.4 U. tit 01118.8 x915.5 so 815.8 913 15.5 09.9 JOT COVFRAGF• Lot Area = 9,987 SF , 915.1 x916.6 0916.5 0. A 6Z 915{ OO 915.7 0915.0 NORM UNE OF INE SOLON 5 K k O , F , LOT 65 916.5 0016.4 0915.2 162 0288.4 0 Sx.,• x916.4 T L. LI I 1.7,* ,-11 918.0111 09169 !!--1 9160 916.0 918.3 GARAGE F20011.916.3 x918.4 0914.2 S89'47'13"E 199 915.n 0917.0 15.7 0916.3 0915.5 -ON .0 918. IRV BOXES 61 -I 9916.3 I ! 14111 MORNINGSIOF Ira. FRONT E4110,217.5 GARAGE /1.0013.1115.5 915 0915.3 X916.5 x915.8 pl p ,.r x915.3 LC9 X9 911.2 .919.9 COVERAGE: House = 851 SF Detoched Garage = 368 SF Shed = 103 SF Paver P000 = 107 SF ALLOWANCES: Pallo = -107 SF Total = tdii SF 255 Madman, 00000519 Lot Coverage IMPERVIOUS SURFACE- Lat Area = 9,987 SF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: House = 851 SF Detached Garage = 368 SF Shed x• 103 SF Paver Pallo Iv/ Slops - 115 SF Paver Walk = 238 SF Concrete Walk 45 SF Driveway 11 Garage Apron - 791 SF Total i.55.111 SF 50% Moximum Allowable Lot Cowroge N0 -All exieting building dimensions ore measured to the finished siding and not the building foundation. -No *earth was made for any easements. -The location o all utiilles 91101V0 0 e from either Observed evidence in th field and/or from plans furnished by the utility companies and ala approximate. Utility companies should be notified for exact location before doing any excovation. 912 911,510 9 1.5TC MORNINGSIDE ROAD qqI ion 4914.3 M114.3 0814.3 x914.0 9913.7 0914.5 91 6(0 1IW 4.5 915.8 1111E 0,, 91 12.2 914.4 914 913.4 913 , • SET 24.0 HMI ON NET 6 • 915.6. 7 C.,VDS AY 91 915.2 0. Tl 900.9 3 0,74111i SAN N.H. TOP-910.80 INVERT 1959.4 IV SCALE IN FEET REPAR CURB LTR MORNINGSIDE ROAD SHAD 1,111. 0 TDP-910A3 CM U.H. TOP.910.60 INVERT-666.4 x 916 4 0914.3 x914.3 3.1 10 10 20 SCALE IN FEET z 0 501 PROPOSED SITE PLAN FOR: C. ALAN HOMES LEGEND Fence Stone Retaining Wall C Sanitory Monhole O Storm Manhole ErisUng Contour • Set Wag Nab • Found Iron Monument • ine:cAifla ItarTg230 Proposed Contour 0(900.0) Proposed Elevation Proposed Retaining Wall 20 14246 5904 DR. FROM DMW-916.0 PEAS 1699117.943.6 914.1 gyAr 914.1 421 felts moliraNGSOE RD. FROM EriffRY=917.5 GARAGE FLOOR-9155 A /.//E 915.7 GRAC - Lny Boy, 48 1 x916.3 25277 8.5 ir916.4916 •16.6 */ EX15CrniED /4, -51 SIDE s'el 91.9 -.LP.- „G,. //...Ica// • • 916.6 (914.6)0 , 0916.4 9 6.3 916.0 0, 913.4 913- - FXISTING Fl TVATIONS- Front Peak ra'itj,, = -9;i6.z MMM HG IDT OINFRABF. Lot Area = 9.987 SF COVERAGE, Noose = 851 SF Detached Garage = 368 SF Shed - 103 SF Paver Patio w 107 SF ALLOWANCES: Patio = -107 SF Total 1631i SF 250 Maximum Allowiable Lot Coverage FX15101f1 IMPERMMIS MIRFAITi Lot Area = 9.987 SF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: House w 851 SF Detached Garage = 368 SF Shed = 103 SF Favor Patio re/ Steps = 115 SF Paver Walk = 238 SF Control* Walk = 45 SF Driveway & Garage Apron = 791 SF Total i. 5 5 . 1 SF 50% Maximum Allowable Lot Coverage MitipOSFO I OT COW. Lot Area 9,987 SF COVERAGE: Room < 2,366 SF Polio - 198 SF Demo Dieting Shed - 0 SF ALLOWANCES: Patio ie -ISO SF Thth1 i'44.2i SF 2.51 or 2,496 SF Maximum Allowable Lot Coveroav PROPOSED IMPERVMUS SURFA/Wi Lot Area - 9,987 SF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: Room = 2,366 SF Stoop 4. 42 SF Patio = 196 SF Wolk = 56 SF Driveway - 1,138 SF Dorm Dieting Shed - 0 SF Total = gati SF 500 or 4,993 SF Ifindmum Nlowablo Lot Covisrogo Pi E MI a:Eating MT beading ""° to the tin jet"° siding and not Ne dimension. -No search was made for any easements. -The Mcolion o oll utilities shown are from either observed evidence in th field and/or from plans furnished by the utility componies and ore approximate. Utility companies ohouid ba notified for exact locotMn before doing any excavation. 915 915 - -.' 141 2 916.9 os%9 (914.3) 1" IF 2 91", 914.48 914- . . SET RAG NAA fitl. BET St DIRECT PORTION OF RUNI4OFF B TO CATO_ MW -S89.47 13 E 199=72-MEA: 63111211 x914.3 x914.5 IRETNNING IOU (Da,K91 Eff 0114:125) FETNMIG WALL PRIM (814.13)1 g 9(914.2) 915 91 . -X-(913.7) 'x915.3 8irow.> CAM CUT 4241 NIDI OR. FROP05617 ROAM PHI ERST FLOM PLAN FRET FICI7417(1116.10) 113P OF FNO:4910.41) WAAGE FLOOR-01007 8 FLOOrt=i077.713) THE70141W(M&M) TO MST FITG•=1.0C4T ELEW11049,$.-.416 f PRIOR TO COISTRUCTION. INSTAL STOMA SEVER INLET PROTECTION ON AU_ CATOI 1149N9 070933 TO CONSTRUCTION SEMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAR 1 0 2020 CITY OF EDINA x9I5.5 .915.6 \KIM UNE Of THE SOUTH OF LOT 65 N PERFOPUTED PVC MILE IN ROCK BED 914.2 4.2 .914.0 REVISIONS DRAWN CME REFERENCE A013 NO. 22-20A BOOK/PAGE 166/25 SHEET 1 of 1 SITE ADDRESS 4248 Alden Dr. Edina. MIN 55416 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The South 50 feet of Lot 65, MORN1NOSIOE, Hennepin County. Mennesota. BENCHMARK T N H on the south aide of Morningside Rd. east of Alden Dr. Elevation = 909.37. I hereby certify that this survey. plow or report wos prepared by me or under my direct super-Webs: and that I am a duly registered Land Surveyor under the taws of the State of Minnesota. W. BROWN LAND SURVEYING, INC. DATED) 03.04.2020 W000ROW A. BROWN. R.L.S. MN REG 13230 W. BROWN LAND SURVEYING, INC. 6030 CEDAR BMWs ...SUBS 228. 81.00/411.1070/1, MN 55425 Bus: (052)1354.405.5 FAx:(052)1354.4268 EMAIL: INFOOWBROWNLANDSURVE,NG.coM SCALE 1 =10 GOPHERSTATEONECALLORG 1600)252-1166 TOLL FREE (651)454-0002 LOCAL NORTH UNE OF THE SOUTH OF LOT 65 lfrf POSES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. INSTALL STORM SEWER INLET PROTECTION ON ALL CATCH BASINS EXPOSED TO CONSTRUCTION SEDIMENT MORNINGSIDE ROAD 10 0 10 20 SCALE IFI FEET PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAR 1 0 2020 CITY OF EDINA DATE REVISION 23460 P.E. NAME DATE: 03/04/2020 DRAWING: \ sener \ Projects \ 2020 \ #20-516 4240 Alden Dr.. Edina (C-Alan Hornes)\2020-03-02\20516c10.dwg LAYOUT: C1 #20-516 jm XREF: siteplan / (Sunder Engineering, PLLC. MOW CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SERVICES 10830 NESBITT AVENUE SOUTH BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55437 19521 881.3344 TELEPHONE 19521881-1913 FAX wove sundeciol corn 4248 ALDEN DRIVE EDINA, MN I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT IAM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF INNESOTA. lt.n4/A0-0 INFORMATION: PROJECT NO: 020.516 DRAWN BY: lm CHECKED BY: as APPROVED BY: bhm graphic 03/002020 DESCRIPTION. STORM/ATER MANAGEMENT PLAN SHEET NO: C1 1 of 3 SILTFENCE DIRECT PORTION OF ROOF RUNNOFF TO CATCH BASIN 4'74 OD -131TU7r1rXr_A-11-dr- _13240.44 NIEN SOUL SCALE: DATE: EDINA SITE DRAINAGE PRECAUTIONS: 1. Reduce soil compaction by limiting equipment access to specific construction paths, if applicable. 2. Loosen compacted soils through raking, tinning, tilling, or other methods to a minimum depth of 6 inches. 3. Place new, organic rich, topsoil to a minimum depth of 4 inches on areas of disturbance. 4. Place sod or seed and mulch on exposed soils as soon as practical. EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES: 1. Delineate the location of areas not to be disturbed (e.g. with flags, stokes, signs, silt fence, etc.) on the development site before work begins. 2. Avoid removal of trees and surface vegetation wherever possible. Schedule construction in order to expose the smallest practical area of soil at any given time. Implement appropriate construction phasing, vegetative buffer strips, horizontal slope grading, and other construction practices that minimize erosion. 3. Following initial soil disturbance or redisturbance, complete permanent or temporary stabilization against erosion due to rain, wind, and running water as soon as possible, but in no case later than 14 calendar days, on all disturbed or graded areas including stormwoter management pond sideslopes. This requirement does not apply to those areas that are currently being used for material storage or for those areas on which grading, site building, or other construction activities are actively underway. 4. Provide temporary grass seed cover on all topsoil stockpiles and other areas of stockpiled excavated material in order to prevent soil erosion and rapid runoff during the construction period. Prolonged periods of open, bare earth without grass cover will not be permitted. Stabilize all disturbed greenspace areas with a minimum of 4" topsoil immediately after final subgrade completion. Seed and mulch, or sod and stake these areas within 48 hours after completion of final grading work (weather permitting). INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CLEANLINESS OF THE SITE AND THE MAINTENANCE OF THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS: CURT BREKKE C-ALAN HOMES 5215 TERRACEVIEW LANE NORTH, PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 PHONE: (612) 282-7546 EMAIL: curtb19720gmail.com Existing boundary, location, topographic, and utility information shown on this plan is from a field survey by W. Brown Land Surveying, Inc. dated 02-20-2020. The Engineer is not responsible for inaccuracies related to the survey information. KEY PROPOSED RUNOFF FLOW DIRECTION EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR (895.9) PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE 1 Delineate the location of areas not to be disturbed (e.g. with flags, stokes, signs, silt fence, etc.) before work begins. 2 Establish sediment control practices on all down gradient perimeters before any up gradient land disturbing activities begin. These practices shall remain in place until final stabilization has been established. 3 Install all perimeter sediment control devices and construction entrances. The timing of the installation of sediment control practices may be adjusted in order to accommodate short-term activities, but sediment control practices must be installed before the next precipitation event even if the short-term activity is not complete. 4 Contact the City for approval of the sediment control devices. 5 Rough grade the site. 6 Install utilities. 7 Install pavements. 8 Install lawn and landscape. 9 Restore oil disturbed areas. 10 Clean all storm sewer and conveyance systems. 11 After all disturbed areas are stabilized, obtain approval from the City and/or Watershed District. 12 Remove all temporary sediment control devices. TOTAL LOT AREA = 9,987 SO. FT. EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA = 2,512 SQ. FT. PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA = 4,892 SQ. FT. NET INCREASE IN IMPERVIOUS AREA TO PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY = 2,846 SQ. FT. NET DECREASE IN IMPERVIOUS AREA TO PRIVATE PROPERTY = 466 SQ. FT. City of Edina Storm Water Reauirements: In the City of Edina, construction of a new dwelling unit requires a storm water management plan meeting the Category 2 criteria. No increase in peak runoff rotes to private properties for the 10% annual probability rainfall event (NOM Atlast 14, 10-year) is allowed. 5. Stabilize all disturbed areas to be paved using early application of gravel base. 6. Apply necessary moisture to the construction area in order to prevent the spread of dust. 7. In areas to be permanently stabilized, landscape with decorative rock, plantings, and sod. Refer to the approved Landscape Plan for design and details. 8. The street will be swept clean before the end of each day of active construction, when sediment is tracked into the street. 9. Areas with slopes greater than 3 to 1 and areas next to wetlands/waterbodies graded or exposed during construction shall be protected with temporary vegetation, mulching or other means as soon as practical. 10. No concrete washout shall occur on site unless it is done with an approved Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) device or standard. 11. Stockpiles shall be surrounded with adequate perimeter control to prevent sedimentation and erosion. 12. Site shall be kept clean at all times and refuse properly controlled. 13. Temporary pumping shall not be permitted without the use of an approved Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) device or standard. 14. The contractor shall inspect on a weekly basis and after any rainfall greater than 0.5' oll erosion control devices and make any repairs immediately. An inspection log shall be kept on site detailing these inspections and repairs preformed. RETAINING WALL (DESIGN BY OTHERS) N RET YOU. ISILTFENCE CLEANOUT INV. = 902.31 1 TOP = 913.20 INV. = 910.20 ST. S. POP UP -Il same •er 3 'mu 64` b DIA. PERFORATED PVC- u uuuu DRAINTILE IN ROCK BED -EStsIEB-spdrr s£1131(6%- 1 16 LF 6" DRAINT1LE 0 5.0oz FOUNDATION UNE ?AM EP AEE F)R Mm J a 5.0 13- CONC . STOOP _IS 50 1 1 M ice/ 6" DIA. PERFORATED PVC DRAINTILE IN ROCK BED ROOF DRAIN JO/ = 912.9 RETAINING WALL (DESIGN BY OTHERS) BUILDER TO VERWY PROPOSED FLOOR ELEVATIONS • FIRST ROOR=(918.10) TOP OF Rio. (916.41) BASENENT 8000.(907.70) PEN( HEIGHT=(945.58) 4248 ALDEN DR. PROPOSED HOUSE PER FIRST FLOOR PUN 91 912 B. eon? OUT VaIDON 4 LLLLLLL LLLLLLL LLL 'LLLLLLL LLLILLLLL LLL z LI .LLLLL LLLLLLL L FRONT XTEXX 2-.9,_LLLLLL t LL0 LLLLL I 1 ! ! 1 ! 'I LLL LLL _LLL LLL LLL L LL),11_L L L LLC1, . LL L LLL _i_L, pRPOSEDL DRNENAY /CELL LLL .L I IIILL LLLLLI LLL LLI_LLL_Lo_LLLI 6'1 LLLLLL 41, LLLLLL• _LLLLLL LLLLLLL LL LLL _LLLLLL LLLLLLL LL LL _LLLLLL LLLLLLLL,I_LL L _LLLLLL LLLLLLLL,LLL - - - /PROPOSED% 1.STOCKPILE %LO N z LU D GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE ----- 50' GENERAL NOTES 1. USE HANCOR HENRY DUTY CORRUGATED PIPE. OR APPROVED EQUAL 2. USE MIRAFI 140N GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC. OR APPROVED EQUAL 3. SELECT GRANULAR ALL MATERIAL SHALL BE A CLEAN, MEDIUM GRAINED, UNIFIED SOIL CLASIFICATION SYSTEM (USCS) OSTIA D2487) SP SAND MEETING THE FOLLOWING GRADATION REQUIREMENTS: SIFVE SIZF 75 mm (3 finch) 4.75 mm (No. 4) 0.425 mm (No. 40) 0.075 mm (No. 200) 4. COARSE FILTER AGGREGATE SHALL BE A FREE DRAINING MINERAL PRODUCT, FOCI UDING CRUSHED CARBONATE QUARRY ROCK, LIMESTONE, CRUSHED CONCRETE, AND SALVAGED BITUMINOUS MIXTURE. z PASSING 100 75-100 0-40 0-5 / / 18' 6' COVER STONE 6' TUBING 6' STONE BED SELECT GRANULAR FILL DEPTH VARIES GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC 6' MIN. OVERLAP COARSE FILTER AGGREGATE. USE IGNEOUS ROCK, OR SIMILAR INSOLUBLE, DURABLE, AND DECAY-RESISTANT MATERIAL BETWEEN THREE-FOURTHS INCH AND 2-1/2 INCHES IN SIZE, WITH NO MORE THAN FIVE PERCENT BY WEIGHT PASSING A THREE-FOURTHS INCH SIEVE AND NO MORE THAN ONE PERCENT BY WEIGHT PASSING A NO. 200 SIEVE. MATERIALS GREATER THAN 2-1/2 INCHES IN SIZE SHALL NOT EXCEED FIVE PERCENT BY WEIGHT. 6' DIAMETER PERFORATED POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PVC (ASTM D2729) OR CORRUGATED POLYETHYLENE PE (ASTM F405) DRAINTILE 0 12 FOOT MINIMUM WIDTH MNDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3733 TYPE V PERMEABLE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MATERIAL BENEATH THE ROCK iteplon /20-516 3m DRAWING: \\server \ ProjedA2020V20-516 4248 Alden Er., Edina (C-Man Hornes)\2020-03-02 20516c10.d wg LAYOUT: C3 XREF: DATE REVISION 23468 P.E NAME DATE: 03/04/2020 DATE: 03/04/2020 L / (S u n d e\ Engineering, PLLC. CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SERVICES 10830 NESBITT AVENUE SOUTH BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55437 (952) 881-3344 TELEPHONE 1952) 881-1913 FAX WNW sundecivil corn 4248 ALDEN DRIVE EDINA, MN I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT IAM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF INNESOTA. tio41/4.) odistat INFORMATION: PROJECT NO.: 820-516 DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: ss APPROVED BY: bhrn SCALE: graphic DESCRIPHON: DETAILS SHEET NO: C3 3af3 24—INCH HIGH CUT—OFF DIKE WITH MAXIMUM SIDESLOPES OF 4:1 TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 6 INCH MINIMUM THICKNESS PUBLIC R -140 00 00 0 ► 00 0 00 00 0 00 0 111. 30 FOOT MINIMUM LENGTH 0 00 00 00 0 00 009)0 0 00 00 00 is• • 00 (DO (DO o (DO 00 00 00 0 00 00 o0 b0 ti 4() 00 cp 00 0 4%00 (DO 00 00 (D 0 0000000000 00 00 00 00 0 00 00 00 0 • 04: 1 TO 2 INCH DIAMETER WASHED ROCK, MN DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3137 CA-1, CA-2, CA-3 OR EQUAL COARSE AGGREGATE 411. o 0 00 o PROPOSED GRADE 4' TOPSOIL DRAINTILE 2 INCH SQUARE HARDWOOD, PINE, OR STANDARD T- OR U-SECTION STEEL POSTS. DO NOT EXCEED MAXIMUM POST SPACING OF 4 FT. O.C. FABRIC COLOR SHALL BE INTERNATIONAL ORANGE PERSPECTIVE VIEW GEOTEXTILE FABRIC IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT STD. SPEC. 3886 FOR SELF SUPPORTING SILT FENCE JOIN SECTIONS L 1E WRAP POSTS AND TIE TOGETHER 30" MIN. HEIGHT DIRECTION OF SURFACE FLOW LAY THE FABRIC AGAINST THE SIDES AND BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH. BACKFILL AND COMPACT WITH A VIBRATORY PLATE COMPACTOR ANCHOR FABRIC IN SOIL USE LATH AND STAPLES TO ATTACH FABRIC TO WOOD POSTS. USE TIE WIRES TO ATTACH FABRIC TO STEEL POSTS. USE HOG RINGS TO ATTACH FABRIC TO WIRE MESH SECTION VIEW ANCHOR SUPPORT POST IN SOIL REINFORCE WITH SNOW FENCE, WIRE MESH, OR STIFF PLASTIC FENCE IN AREAS WHERE CONCENTRATED FLOWS OCCUR (SUCH AS SWALES, DITCHES, AND IN FRONT OF CULVERTS AND CATCHBASINS) SILT FENCE INSTALLATION PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAR 1 0 2020 CITY OF EDINA Authentislgo ID: 34CA63BC.A8F4-4461-8926-C8402300812 Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. Please fully explain your answers using additional sheets of paper as necessary. The Proposed Variance will: YES NO Relieve practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable k.," <.; e s .A- cl Wks \- w-. Ck\kto,v-e 4 4C ,6:C C) Oon‘j rAl'‘ t r 0"4:4,1 Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district --r VC-) A -Z. .14 NO' eAN Nn c..et rt ‘Ai \ (IN A-11 , A 9 Lt w.ts x. A- ek. '•-kr c), ck ce.,A cs. 0\ 0,171,4,_ est 4 e, CI; 10) 1' V\./ Be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance A \A (20 .A\n‘k3 -19-f(14f tbj - kk.5 law e r‘ 5 1 t 'Act , v.‘ V‘ '‘ 3 \) 010 5;, o_v‘x) cA-(AVt•V(' St.).;:k‘n 1,ksk • -,",3 cx 1.4 \.2 -A- f\ t‘ Q-• A" toy" crk. rZw Ate Not alter the essential Character of a neighborhood 'Tk-z 1-10 Ch,SPA t•re. ,A4..? 4-1,a r ht3 &•;(..S 51-1 61-Zvsd% Lv.z. t.1 PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAR 1 0 2020 CITY OF EDINA 2 Edina, Hennepin, MetroGIS, Edina, Hennepin, MetroGIS | © WSB & Associates2013, © WSB & Associates 2013 4248 Alden Drive April 16, 2020 1 in = 50 ft / Buildable Area within Required Setbacks Surrounding Setback Information (Setbacks to Morningside Road) 1.4114 Morningside-16.1 feet (2011 survey) 2.4249 Alden-roughly 6 feet-no survey on file, rough measurement taken off an aerial 3.4300 Eton-13 feet (according to 1988 survey on file)4.4301 Eton-Roughly 22 feet-no survey on file, rough measurement taken off an aerial5.4248 Scott Terrace-Roughly 13 feet, survey on file didn't have house setback, rough measurement taken off an aerial6.4200 Morningside Road-16 feet (1978 survey) 7.4208 Morningside Road-29.8 feet (survey)8.4249 Crocker-17.15 feet *7.4-foot front yard setback variance for a new home approved in 2019 1 2 3 4 5678 1 Liz Olson From:Jeff Framke Sent:Friday, May 22, 2020 10:52 AM To:Sharon Allison Cc:Emily Bodeker; Dawson, Katie; Dawson, Peter; Fast, Chris; Jeff Framke; Framke, Jilene; Johnson, Dwight; Kohner, Kathee; Miller, Kay; Nahlovsky, Jody; Nelson, Scott; Nelson, Shan; Scott, Aaron; Toth, Doug; Toth, Sue; Warner, Andy; Warner, Mary; Wee, Morris; Williams, Nicki Subject:Appeal Notice for 4248 Alden Dr EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello Sharon. We the undersigned, want to appeal the zoning variance granted by the Edina Planning Commission at their meeting on May 13, 2020 for the property at 4248 Alden Drive. We also would like advisement as to the best way for us to submit documents for the City Council to review before the meeting. Thank you and please confirm receipt. Concerned Morningside Neighbors: 3915 Morningside Rd - Nicki Williams 4101 Morningside Rd - Chris Fast & Kay Miller 4103 Morningside Rd - Dwight & Kris Johnson 4105 Morningside Rd - Jeff & Jilene Framke 4107 Morningside Rd - Andy & Mary Warner 4110 Morningside Rd - Peter & Katie Dawson 4111 Morningside Rd - Morris Wee 4309 Morningside Rd - Doug & Sue Toth 4249 Alden Dr - Kathee Kohner 4244 Alden Dr - Scott & Shan Nelson 4236 Alden Dr - Jody Nahvlosky 4300 Eton Place - Aaron Scott Appeal of Edina Planning Commission approval of a variance for 4248 Alden Drive 6/5/2020 Page 1 of 8 To: Edina City Council From: Concerned Edina citizens Re: Appeal of the Edina Planning Commission approval of a variance for a proposed construction project at 4248 Alden Drive Objectives and justification: We the undersigned believe that the Planning Commission’s decision to grant a setback variance allowing construction of a home at 4248 Alden Drive closer to the sidewalk on Morningside than allowed by code was made in error for the following reasons: 1) We believe that the variance application submitted by the developer to the Edina Planning Commission contained significant misleading and inaccurate information. We also believe that the information submitted by the developer to the Planning Commission grossly understates the true impacts of the proposed project on the neighborhood. 2) We believe that problems with the new and relatively unfamiliar virtual meeting process made it difficult to ensure that all parties had equal opportunity to be heard. Many felt that the developer was able to unduly and inappropriately influence the variance hearing. The video recording of the variance hearing is available at https://www.edinamn.gov/746/Watch-a-City-Meeting. Edina Municipal Code Sections relevant to the appeal request include the following: Edina Municipal Codes, Chapter 36 – Zoning: Article 1 – In General. “The council finds that the city has emerged from an era exemplified by unparalleled growth and development and has entered a period of stability, reuse and redevelopment; that some of the standards and regulations which guided initial development of the city are not appropriate for guiding future development and redevelopment…” Comment: Many of us well remember this period when teardown and rebuild activity seemed almost uncontrolled. There was palpable anger in the community at that time directed primarily at construction of homes that were much too large for the property. The city council, after much discussion and planning and with input from the citizens of Edina, revised the codes to put reasonable restrictions on “overbuilding.” These changes included revised setback requirements. We fully understand that there are times when granting a variance is appropriate. However, we will show why we strongly believe that granting a setback variance for this specific house on this specific property was not appropriate Edina Municipal Codes, Sec. 36-68, (a), (1): “Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this chapter and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan. Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. The term "practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this chapter; the plight of Appeal of Edina Planning Commission approval of a variance for 4248 Alden Drive 6/5/2020 Page 2 of 8 the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.” We will show why we believe 1) that there are no practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance, and 2) if this construction is allowed to proceed as proposed by the developer, it will permanently negatively alter “the essential character of the locality.” Reviewing the developer’s responses to the four conditions required for granting a code variance: Minnesota Statutes and Edina Ordinances (Sec. 36-98 (a)) require that for a variance to be granted, the developer must certify that four specific conditions will be met. The developer is required to fully explain, in detail, how these conditions will be satisfied. Below are listed the four conditions, the developer’s written explanation of how his requested variance will satisfy each condition, and our comments regarding the developer’s explanations. We assert that this application fails the test for all four clauses. Condition 1: “The proposed variance will relieve practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable.” Developer: “Our difficulty is the west house setback. If we are allowed to build a new home but not go any further south than the existing home this will work.” Neighborhood response: 1) The existing structure was built in 1914, when Morningside Road was a meandering dirt track, and 15 years before the Edina Planning Department was formed. It was built at a time of no rules or regulation. It makes no sense to argue that a new house built today, 106 years later, should somehow have an inherent right to the same, or similar, setback. It is a different world and a very different community. As an aside, the developer’s statement above is extremely confusing and NOT even in-line with his variance request. He proposed moving the south setback back from 10.2 feet to 11.2 feet). Now he’s saying “n not go any further south than the existing home” (10.2 feet). Neither scenario is acceptable as we will demonstrate, but the developer’s comment is confusing nonetheless. 2) The developer fails to mention that only approximately 15' of the existing structure is 10.2’ from the South property line (Figure 1). This is approximately 7% of the lot length. The proposed design (even at an 11.2 setback) will violate the existing ordinance for 86’ (43% of the lot length)! A house this massive built as close to the sidewalk as proposed would in-itself be intimidating and completely out-of-place in the Morningside community (Figure 2). Unfortunately, these negative effects will be greatly exacerbated by the fact that this structure will be located on a rise that is four feet higher than the sidewalk. The effect will be of a house completely out-of-scale for the neighborhood, overwhelming all the homes around it. One resident commented that “…it will feel like a motel on the corner lot!” Appeal of Edina Planning Commission approval of a variance for 4248 Alden Drive 6/5/2020 Page 3 of 8 3) We see no inherent difficulty in complying with the zoning ordinance. Nearby properties at 4114 and 4115 Morningside either adhere to zoning codes, or required only slight variances: 4114 Morningside is built on a smaller lot (50x140) and was recently renovated with a main structure setback of 16.1’ from the property line and 12’ for the front door; 4115 Morningside is on a 50x200 lot, this new construction also appears to achieve an approximately 18' setback measured from the sidewalk of Grimes Avenue. We assert that these two proof points within a single block serve to rebut the assertion that there are practical difficulties adhering to the zoning ordinance. Condition 2: “The proposed variance will correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district.” Developer: “The lot to the west is a different configuration. It is 100’ deep compared to our 50’ width. Matching the west setback would create a buildable area only 15’ 2” wide.” Neighborhood response: The developer is here injecting the false idea to the commission that he is required to match the setback of the house to the west. We suspect this is a canard to make the false “you can only build a 15’ house” assertion. It was apparently successful as it was repeated multiple times by commission members throughout the meeting. The fact is that, in the same sentence of the code that refers to use of an adjacent property for the setback calculation, is also found the following option: “… OR the front street setback shall be the average front street setback of all other dwelling units on the same side of that street, between intersections” [Sec. 36-439 (1). a. 1]. The developer never revealed that there was this option. Did he not know about it? Hard to believe since it was in the same sentence! A more probable explanation is that the developer was cherry-picking rules that worked to his advantage. In fact, there is also a home at 4114 Morningside Rd to consider per the Edina setback code. And if the setback had instead been calculated based on the average setbacks of the 4110 (29.8’) and 4114 (12’) homes, the setback would be 20.9’ and the buildable width would be 24.1 feet (a 9 foot increase) or a 59% larger building pad than the developer was willing to admit! We were also deeply disappointed that the commission did not push back on the developer's assertion that if the setback were reduced (in response to the chairperson's concerns about massing on Morningside), the house would simply become wider. That displayed an arrogance that a 25% pad-size house was going to be built, regardless of the planning commission. The 25% is a limit, not an entitlement, and other factors may apply to limit the usable pad size below 25%. This variance request seems to be about nothing more than granting a developer higher profits from a massive project, not what is best for the community! Whatever the motivation, the information provided by the developer in the variance application and in the variance hearing was inaccurate and misleading. He had much more space to work with than he was willing to disclose. Appeal of Edina Planning Commission approval of a variance for 4248 Alden Drive 6/5/2020 Page 4 of 8 Condition 3: “The proposed variance will be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance.” Developer: “A family has bought this property and they plan on raising their family in Edina. Their intent is to not go any further south than the existing home and be in harmony.” Neighborhood response: The developer here gives essentially the same response here as he gave for Condition 1 but with the addition of a family. We welcome new families to the neighborhood, but this response by the developer evades the questions raised by Condition 3. The demographics of the owners have no relevance to the validity of the variance request. Families will come and go, but the house will likely be here for many decades. Regarding the developer’s statement here that “Their intent is to not go any further south than the existing home…”, please see our response in Condition 1 where we have already covered this aspect in detail. Regarding “harmony,” many of us well remember that time when seemingly unfettered teardown and subsequent rebuilding of massive homes on too small lots outraged many in the community. In response, and with careful consideration, zoning laws were revised in order to exercise some control over worst of these excesses. The proposed new construction would be 86 feet wide and have a roof peak height of nearly 30 feet. And, being situated on a rise approximately 4 feet above sidewalk level, the house would tower nearly 34 feet above the sidewalk creating a huge, intimidating mass (Figure 1.). This would be a fine home in Chanhassen or Chaska but it definitely could not be considered to be “in harmony” in Morningside! Condition 4: “The proposed variance will not alter the essential character of a neighborhood.” Developer: “The new home design compliments the neighborhood. The design blends in well.” Neighborhood Response: The issues are the massive size of the house located so close to and elevated 4 feet above the sidewalk. We are not aware of any other house in the immediate Morningside area that is sited in such an intrusive manner. It is a house that would stand out not blend in. And, it would alter the character of the neighborhood, in a very negative way, for generations to come (Figure 2). Furthermore, the builder has moved the driveway to Alden Drive rather than its current location off Morningside Road. The garage and irregular driveway, located just a few feet from a major intersection, is not harmonious with the neighborhood. No other property on Alden Drive has a garage as the predominant feature. It would definitely not be harmonious with the other homes on the street. In fact, given the pattern of homes located on Alden, the disharmony would be almost Appeal of Edina Planning Commission approval of a variance for 4248 Alden Drive 6/5/2020 Page 5 of 8 unsettling! As previously stated, this huge house on a hill with driveway moved to the corner would look fine in Chaska or Chanhassen, but not a city block neighborhood like Morningside. In Summary: Minnesota Statutes and Edina Ordinances (Sec. 36-98 (a)) require that for a variance to be granted, the developer must certify that all four specific conditions will be met. Not two of four. Not three of four but four of four. We assert that this application fails the test for all four clauses. As Morningside neighbors who will be adversely affected by this construction should the variance be allowed to stand, we want the Council to understand how strongly opposed we are to granting this variance. Some of us have lived here for many decades, others only a short time. But we all chose this place for its “feel,” a hard to define sense of neighborliness and community where we all feel equal. We enjoy the architectural diversity…a diversity where there is a unity of scale and an overall sense of community. This proposed new house construction for 4248 Alden Drive is much too massive for this neighborhood and most important, much too large for this property (Figure 2). It would ruin the sense of neighborhood unique to Morningside. The Morningside Neighborhood Association describes it this way: “Today, Morningside retains a charming village-within-a-city atmosphere that is distinct from the rest of Edina.” Unfortunately, today that atmosphere is threatened by this proposed development! The planning commission is made up of honest, hard-working citizens trying to do the best job possible for the city of Edina. But the developer was able to push reasonable sounding but false and misleading information, which in the context of the confusing new virtual meeting format and the fatigue of the very long meeting, ended with the variance approval. We hope that when you, members of the City Council, look at the facts we have presented, you will agree that this variance would, in fact, negatively and irreversibly “…alter the essential character of the locality” we all love. We respectfully request that you vote to deny this variance. Appeal of Edina Planning Commission approval of a variance for 4248 Alden Drive 6/5/2020 Page 6 of 8 Neighborhood support: We the undersigned, Morningside residents who will be affected by the proposed construction project at 4248 Alden Drive, are in full agreement with this document and its contents: 4246 Scott Terrace – Jim Balabuszko-Reay 4246 Scott Terrace – Pamela Balabuszko-Reay 3915 Morningside Rd – Nicki Williams 3915 Morningside Rd – Ryan Williams 4101 Morningside Rd - Kay Miller 4101 Morningside Rd - Chris Fast 4103 Morningside Rd – Dwight Johnson 4103 Morningside Rd - Kris Johnson 4105 Morningside Rd – Jeff Framke 4105 Morningside Rd - Jilene Framke 4107 Morningside Rd - Andy Warner 4107 Morningside Rd - Mary Warner 4110 Morningside Rd - Katie Dawson 4110 Morningside Rd – Peter Dawson 4111 Morningside Rd - Morris Wee 4309 Morningside Rd - Doug Toth 4309 Morningside Rd - Sue Toth 4235 Alden Dr - Alice Macdonald 4235 Alden Dr – Scott Macdonald 4236 Alden Dr - Jody Nahvlosky 4244 Alden Dr - Scott Nelson 4244 Alden Dr - Shan Nelson 4246 Alden Dr - FrancisWassmer 4249 Alden Dr - Todd Kohner 4249 Alden Dr - Kathee Kohner 4300 Eton Place - Aaron Scott 6/5/2020 Page 7 of 8 Figure 1. 4248 Alden Drive, south side of home as viewed from Morningside Road 6/5/2020 Page 8 of 8 Figure 2. To: Edina City Council Re: Appeal of the Edina Planning Commission approval of a requested variance for a proposed construction project at 4248 Alden Drive. I agree fully with the letter that has been written to you on behalf of 15 neighborhood households. My personal strongest objections are to the failure of the proposal to comply with condition #4: "will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood." Figure 2, appended to our letter, illustrates my response to the proposed design. The proposed house would present a very high, massive, 86' long facade at the high point of the property, which is nearly the highest point in the neighborhood. I invite any of you Council members to walk down the block of Morningside Road that this house proposes to front and try to imagine that it would not "alter the essential character of the neighborhood". This design, if constructed, would impose a huge facade, much higher and much nearer to the sidewalk, than any other house on either side of the street. In the 20 years I have lived in this house in Morningside, I have witnessed many teardowns and major remodels (including my own home, 4111 Morningside Rd). Many have been tasteful and appropriate; some, I have felt, were less so. But none was as ostentatiously out of character for its property and for its neighborhood as this one. Please reject this variance proposal. Morris Wee 4111 Morningside Road June 4, 2020 Edina City Council Dear Sir or Madam, Please note that my spouse, Shan Nelson and I are vehemently opposed to the granting of a variance for the property at 4248 Alden Dr for a multiple of reasons. First and foremost, we did the remodel of our 1915 home without any request of need for a variance 8 years ago. We see absolutely no reason that when starting from a “blank slate” of a “scraped” lot, one would require a variance. Simply put, build something that conforms to the existing codes and regulations. It’s not that difficult. It really isn’t. Secondly, Although I was able to speak briefly over the phone at the planning commission meeting. I found the meeting to be very confusing as initially the variance request was voted down, then after a few words from the builder and the potential family, it was re-voted up? This was absolutely ludicrous. I don’t believe that this would have happened if we would have been able to be at the meeting in person. I fully understand the rationale of meeting electronically, but if this house is built with the current plan, it will likely be with us for 100 years. This is not something that should be taken lightly. Thirdly, there are several very mature trees (4) on or adjacent to the property line. They are owned by my next door neighbor Mr. Francis Wassmer. If the renderings are to be believed, much of the limbs of these trees will be required to be cut. They provide shade for not just his yard, but mine as well. I would like assurances that ALL of these trees will remain untouched in any building project, as well as the root structure protected because much of these trees grow beneath the property in question. As I mentioned on my call, I am also very concerned about a new driveway being cut directly across from the children elementary school bus stop on the exact opposite side of the street. This is potentially a major safety issue. The driveway for this property should remain on Morningside Road as it has been for the past 100 years, Finally, there are no homes on our street with only a garage protruding out the “front”. This is intentional. I’m no great judge of taste and style (ask my Wife…she’ll tell you) however based upon the builders provided renderings, this exurban garage poking out the former front of the house is ugly at best and not in keeping with the style be it new construction or older homes in the neighborhood. Respectfully submitted, Scott and Shan Nelson 4244 Alden Drive To whom it may concern: I am writing in regard to the proposed variance setback and development at 4248 Alden Drive. We live on the lot west of the proposed house, and we feel concern with the proposed scale of the plan and the proximity to the street. In addition, we watched the variance hearing zoom meeting on May 13. We listened to the builder cite inaccuracies about both our property, the property to the west of us, and the proposed Alden property. A 15-foot width was not the only solution for this lot (the builder claimed that it was the reason for the variance request). Because the builder offers pre-fabricated plans, it behooves the company to sell this plan as a cookie cutter stamped onto the lot. They do not want to redraw or reconfigure plans because this would incur additional expense. If you listen to the meeting on May 13, you will hear the builder cite expense and time as the reason for not making changes to the proposed property. However, it is my understanding that certain regulations have been passed within the City of Edina that would protect residents, and time and money might be necessary to meet these regulations. We hope you will consider our request and would welcome the opportunity to expound or answer any questions. Kind regards, Kathleen and Peter Dawson 4110 Morningside Road To: Edina City Council Re: Appeal of the Edina Planning Commission approval of a variance for a proposed construction project at 4248 Alden Drive My family lives at 4300 Eton Place, on the corner of Morningside Road. We are close enough to look out at the proposed construction project at 4248 Alden Drive from our driveway. Many of my neighbors have raised serious concerns about this project and the way in which the Planning Commission considered (or did not consider) them. I join in and support those concerns. I cannot pretend to nearly as well-informed about the building code or the variance process as are many of my neighbors, but I want to make one point: throughout this process I have repeatedly heard my neighbors point out that the huge differences between the proposed construction project on Alden and some of the very nice new homes that have built in the same area. Examples include the houses built at 4114 Morningside and 4115 Morningside. Another is the house that is nearing completion at 4248 Crocker, also on the corner of Morningside Road. The property on Crocker is on a nearly identical lot, is a very large house, but it not positioned right on the sidewalk. All of these houses are quite large, but still find a way to fit into the neighborhood without crowding sidewalks and neighbors. There is a right way and a wrong way to build new homes in this neighborhood. This group of neighbors is not just generally opposed to new construction or teardowns. Please take these concerns seriously. Aaron Scott 4300 Eton Place To Edina City Council We feel the variance approval for 4248 Alden Drive never should have been approved by the planning commission. We understand the difficulty of “virtual meetings” vs “in-person meetings” and how that may have affected the process, but certain flaws in the process were glaring nonetheless: • No one on the commission challenged this developer on his 15.2’ building area claim when in fact an average of the adjacent properties allows almost 9 additional feet (24.1’). Certain members of the commission were even repeating his 15.2 inaccurate claim. • No one on the commission challenged this developer when he bluntly stated he would just make the house longer if he had to compromise on width. As if he was going to do what he wanted regardless of how the planning commission voted. • No one challenged this developer or the new potential owners when they mentioned any compromise in design would create a safety and nuisance issue for their 4-children. Personal demographics should have no bearing on codes & regulations & variances. What is clearly evident is that the developer used misinformation, intimidation and emotion to his advantage and was allowed to do it. As it turned out, his tactics worked as it was just enough to get the variance approved (barely) after multiple voting rounds. Finally, how can the developer or any planning member who voted in favor of the variance and knows the Morningside area think this house is a good fit for the neighborhood when in fact: • Not one house (including the corner lots of 4114 & 4115 Morningside Rd) in the immediate vicinity have built so close to the property line as this new Alden house was granted. • Not one house or structure facing Alden Drive has a garage as the dominant and only feature facing the street as this house does • The size of the house so close to the sidewalk and situated atop a 4-foot rise will dominate the street view with its 86-foot building front facing Morningside Rd. This house will not blend in as every other house does but rather be an eye-sore for decades to come. Aside from welcoming new neighbors to the neighborhood, we cannot find even one positive thing to say about this new house as it has been presented. The variance request seems to be about nothing more than granting a developer higher profits from a massive project, not what is best for the community! Jeff & Jilene Framke 4105 Morningside Rd We live at 4249 Alden Drive. This is the current view out our front door glass window. Our home faces 4248 Alden Drive front of the house now. The massive size of the new proposed house for the lot would be intrusive and we are not keen on moving the driveway and garage to Alden Drive. All homes on Alden Drive face Alden Drive. No other home on Alden Drive has a garage as the predominant feature. The garage and irregular driveway would cause problems with the intersection, stop sign and bus stop. When we have guests, they park in front of our home. We park in front of our home also since we have a short driveway and need this space for our cars and guests cars. This small area of Alden Drive in front of our home is also where the guests and home owners park for 6 homes. Now, my neighbors have issues backing out of their driveways without hitting cars parked on Alden Drive. On any given day, our street is full of cars parked on Alden Drive. We often have issues with parking when we need work people to come to our home, like Service Plus, painters, plumbers, construction workers etc. who need to have their work vans with supplies nearby. Alden Drive is narrower than Morningside Road and we only have parking on one side of the street on Alden Drive. If the tenants of the house at 4248 Alden Drive change their drive way to Alden instead of Morningside, we have a problem. There is not enough parking on Alden as it is. We get a lot of traffic for Golden Years Montessori on our street also and we have a bus stop on the corner of Alden and Morningside Road and a stop sign at the corner also. This would not be a safe or a smart place for a driveway. Please reconsider this. We need our parking, our stop sign, a safe intersection and our bus stop. The driveway change for the 4248 Alden Drive home is not a good idea and this does not complement our street or the neighborhood. Thank you. Kathee and Todd Kohner 4249 Alden Drive June 4, 2020 Edina City Council Dear Sir or Madam, Please note that my spouse, Alice Macdonald and I are extremely opposed to the granting of a variance for the property at 4248 Alden Dr for a multiple of reasons. 1. How the planning commission was run: after being informed about the details of the planning commission meeting, we feel the meeting sounded very confusing as initially the variance request was voted down, then after a few words from the builder and the potential family, it was re-voted up without offering any additional input from the neighborhood. This is very concerning. 2. The garage front on Alden Drive and the overall look in not keeping with the style of all other homes, older or new construction on Alden Drive. Our impression is that the developer just wants to put a massive house on the lot to maximize profits rather than do what is best for the neighborhood and community. 3. A new driveway being relocated directly across from the children’s elementary school bus stop on the exact opposite side of the street. This could be a major safety issue as we ourselves have 2 young kids that use that specific bus stop. We believe the driveway for this property should remain on Morningside Road as it has been for the past 100 years. This potential safety hazard to our neighborhood children is by far our biggest concern. Respectfully submitted, Scott and Alice Macdonald 4235 Alden Drive June 4, 2020 To: Edina City Council Planning Committee From: Michala (Kay) Miller and Christopher Fast We are writing this letter in protest of the variance that is being granted for new home reconstruction on 4248 Alden, directly across the street and to the north of our home. Having been an Edina Morningside resident for 36 years, I have witnessed a lot of negative change in the neighborhood as far as tear downs and the construction of new homes that are oversized for their lots and neighborhoods, as well as not in keeping of the character of the well established neighborhood. Morningside, along with Linden Hills, have always been considered treasured areas of charm – something one cannot just build or recreate overnight. People move to Morningside because of the charm and now tear downs resulting in massive houses on lots too small is slowly but surely eroding that charm. If variances that continue in the direction of the 4248 property, I fear Morningside will become something more akin to any other random suburb or neighborhood with no identity of its own. Gone will be the well proportioned historic homes on lots with nice yards and plenty of green space! Living across the street of the afore mentioned property, one of our favorite things about our home is the beautiful view of the yard and landscaping at 4248 Alden. Now, Instead, we can look forward to looking out the window at a towering massive building that looks ridiculous squeezed on a lot that is too small and comes out to the sidewalk. Being located at the top of the hill makes the proposed house even more intimidating and literally blocks sunlight to the house next door. Why is it necessary to build a house that size on a lot that size in this neighborhood? There are other lots in other places where that house could be built with no need for a variance that would not render the home to be overwhelming and dominating the street. Isn’t that why we have building codes in the first place? To keep these sort of things from happening? If not, why have codes at all? The builders have no skin in the game other than financial gain. They don’t live on the block. I have no problem with the builders making money, but at whose expense? We in the neighborhood are the ones who have to live with the results of the builder’s doings. Does Edina really care more about pleasing builders by bending to their unreasonable asks rather than valuing their community members and their input? I would hate to think that is true. So please, please, please reconsider granting the current building proposal a variance. Another variance, another step toward destroying historic charm. Sincerely, Kay Miller and Chris Fast 4101 Morningside Road June 4, 2020 Edina City Council Dear Sir or Madam, Please note that I am vehemently opposed to the granting of a variance for the property at 4248 Alden Dr. Although I was able to speak via the phone at the planning commission meeting. I found the meeting to be very confusing as initially the variance request was voted down, (twice I believe!) then after a few words from the builder and the potential family, it was revoted up? Who runs a meeting like this? Offering a revote without ANY additional public comment to counter the arguments from the builder is preposterous. As I mentioned on my call, I am also very concerned about a new driveway being near the root structure of my 50 year old Maple tree in the front of my home, as well as three additional mature Maples and a 5th Walnut on and adjacent to the North property line of the home in question. I am incredibly concerned that this variance will force significant limbing or damage to these beautiful trees I have significant concerns about moving the driveway to Alden Drive. Every school day there are up to 20 elementary aged children on this corner. I find this to be a major safety issue and ask the the builder to please move the garage and associated driveway to Morningside Road. This would be much safer for all parties. The driveway has been on Morningside Road for more than 100 years without incident. Additionally, Alden Drive is significantly narrower than Morningside is 6-8 feet wider than Alden which will facilitate a much easier egress for a potential homeowner. Respectfully submitted, Francis Wassmer 4246 Alden Drive We’re Pamela and Jim Balabuszko-Reay from 4246 Scott Terrace, Edina. We have lived on Scott Terrace for over 20 years. We ask that the variance requested for 4248 Alden be denied. Our main reasons: 1) Imposing size and placement on the lot, diminished quality of life for neighbors, the potential damage to neighboring houses, and it doesn’t respect the character of our historic Morningside neighborhood. It is time for respect for Morningside to return. 2) Our experience with C Alan homes was extremely negative. We are at the intersection of Scott Terrace and Morningside, right by their project at 4001 Morningside Rd. Between the damage they caused to neighbors’ homes, their disregard for safety and lack of integrity doing business they don’t deserve a variance. It is questionable for them to be able to build in Edina at all. • They caused extensive damage to our neighbor’s home and property. Over $70,000 worth. They would not take responsibility and our neighbors had to hire lawyer to sue them. They were left to pay over $30,000 themselves. That’s about the equivalent to a year of college. • Their building practices were dangerous. Just some of the things we witnessed: We have pictures of their cranes across the street from the project literally moving materials high over the road without cones or any other direction to passing cars. They moved materials so high that they rubbed against the electrical wires, tugging them and making sparks, which they were aware of and continued it anyway. We watched as they lost control of an entirely built wall and dropped it, almost on one of the contractors, who was not wearing a helmet. We asked C Alan’s huge construction trucks and contractors to park safely at the intersection constantly. Any pedestrian, kids or adults alike were not safe to cross.. They parked almost into the intersection, making it almost impossible to make a right or left turn without risking an accident. They constantly parked in front of the fire hydrant. They made it impossible for the school bus to get through more than once. Emergency vehicles would have been stuck. We contacted the city over and over again to ask for help. • They worked after hours and on Sundays. We had to report them to the City. • We asked about their long-term uncompleted teardown and build down (4311 Morningside Rd). Construction stopped and started over long periods of time. They left building materials outside for a winter. They shrugged and said their investors ran out of money. The neighbors on either side of the teardown had to live with an undone construction project for a long period of time. Porta Potty and all. The Planning Commission meeting where this variance was requested and approved became very concerning because the meeting didn’t seem to be following proper meeting norms. The meeting was taken over by the builder. It really left a question in our minds about the City’s process for considering residential building. Please don’t hesitate to contact us with any questions. We have called Morningside home for a long time and we care about it deeply. Pamela and Jim Balabuszko-Reay 4246 Scott Terrace This is Ryan and Nicki Williams and we live at 3915 Morningside Rd. We're next door to 4001 Morningside, a tear down project by C Alan homes from 2017-2018. During the excavation process, they did not adequately shore up the ground and our driveway began to crack and sink. We hired a structural engineer and were informed it was not safe to drive on until they poured a foundation next door (6 weeks.) The excavation company used the bucket of a backhoe as a hammer to install the shoring pipes which caused extensive cracking to the stucco of our house and garage. The structural engineer determined that along with the driveway and stucco damage, the garage foundation was sinking on the west side and required a helical pier system to repair it. We filed a lawsuit when the builder, investor and excavation company refused to cover their damages. We eventually received a settlement that covered $46,000 of expenses but another $30,000 was out of our pocket (garage and house stucco replacement, garage foundation repair, driveway replacement, painting, structural engineer fees, exterminator fees, and legal fees.) As the project manager of C Alan Homes referenced in the last Planning Commission meeting, they were passing inspections, which is true. But as we learned, a city inspector is only there to review the shoring and excavation for that project. They don't look at the driveway 6 feet away that's caving in toward the giant hole. While the city employees and officials were sympathetic to our situation, no one was able to help us, even the residential redevelopment coordinator. C Alan Homes had no consequences from the city. The lots in Morningside tend to be long and narrow, like this property and the one next door to us. C Alan Homes did not have a variance at 4001 Morningside and caused us extensive damage. Giving them more space could increase the likelihood of damage to neighboring properties. We wouldn't wish our experience on anyone. Please don't grant the variance. Ryan and Nicki Williams 3915 Morningside Rd. When this builder was working on the house next to us, progress was very slow. I think we had off brand Tyvek flapping in the wind for a good 9 months. The workers did not seem to be very skilled, so the house was not well put together. Doug put together a blog called The Very Lonely House which is still available @verylonelyhouse on Twitter. It chronicles the “progress”. I do know we called the cops on people who were working on the project on Sundays or after hours. The biggest problem we had was with drainage. We worked with the City to get the builders to do some remediation because they had raised the lot level significantly. It took many meetings and months. The builder would promise to do something and then never do it. We would have Charlie Gerk from the City come out again and the builder would say he would do something, but wouldn’t get it done. It took many meetings and finally, they dug a trench along the property, but they never did put in the rain garden they promised. Check out the Twitter feed for more details. Sue Toth 4309 Morningside Rd Date: June 16, 2020 Agenda Item #: VIII.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:PUBLIC HEARING: Ordinance No. 2020-04 and Resolution No. 2020-63 and 2020-64 Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Preliminary Rezoning for 5132 and 5136-48 Hankerson Avenue for Donnay Homes Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to close the public hearing at noon, July 15, and to continue action on the item to the July 21 City Council meeting. INTRODUCTION: Donnay Homes, Inc., on behalf of Elizabeth and Peter MacDonagh is proposing to redevelop the property at the corner of Hankerson Avenue and 52nd Street West (5132 and 5136-48 Hankerson Avenue). The proposal is to tear down the existing two-story four-unit apartment at 5136-48 Hankerson and the single-family home at 5132 Hankerson, and build two four unit, two and a half-story townhomes. The applicant has revised their original plans by eliminating two units out of the project and propose two separate 4-unit buildings to create more green space and preserve trees on the south side of the property. The revisions change the previous request from a high-density designation to medium density. Better Together Edina Public Hearing Comments ATTACHMENTS: Description Planning Commission Staff Report, May 27, 2020 Draft Ordinance No. 2020-04: Amending the Zoning Ordinance Resolution No. 2020-63: Approving Comprehensive Plan Amendment Resolution No. 2020-64: Approving Rezoning & Preliminary Site Plan Memos: Building & Fire, Engineering Proposed Plans: Engineering Proposed Plans: Landscaping & Building Plans Applicant Narrative Grandview Plans May 27, 2020 Planning Commission Cary Teague, Community Development Director Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Preliminary Rezoning – Corner of Hankerson Avenue and 52nd Street West (5132 and 5136-48 Hankerson Avenue) for Donnay Homes Information / Background: Donnay Homes, Inc., on behalf of Elizabeth and Peter MacDonagh is proposing to redevelop the property at the corner of Hankerson Avenue and 52nd Street West. (5132 and 5136-48 Hankerson Avenue; See attached property location.) The proposal is to tear down the existing two-story four-unit apartment at 5136-48 Hankerson and the single-family home at 5132 Hankerson, and build two four unit, two and a half-story townhomes. (See attached applicant narrative and plans.) The applicant has revised their original plans by eliminating two units out of the project and propose two separate 4-unit buildings to create more greenspace and preserve trees on south side of the property. The revisions change the previous request from a high-density designation to medium density. The two properties are currently zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District; the four-unit apartment is an existing nonconforming use. The site is guided low density attached residential, which allows between 4-8 units per acre. The properties total .67 acres or 29,185 square feet in size. The existing density is 7.4 units per acre, which would fit the medium density range (5-12 units per acre). The proposed density would increase to 11.9 units per acre; therefore, this request would require a comprehensive plan amendment. To accommodate the request the following is required: A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to re-guide the site from low density attached to medium density, which would allow the proposed 11.9 units per acre; and STAFF REPORT Page 2 A Rezoning from R-1, Single-Dwelling Unit District to PUD, Planned Residential District, and Preliminary Site Plan SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Single-family homes; zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District and guided low density residential. Easterly: Vernon Avenue and Jerry’s Food; zoned PCD-2, Planned Commercial District and guided MXC, Mixed Use Center. Southerly: High Density Residential Apartment; zoned PRD-3, Planned Residential District; and guided High Density Residential. Westerly: Duplex and single-family homes; zoned R-2 and R-1, Single and Double Dwelling Unit District and guided low density attached. Existing Site Features The subject properties total .67 acres in size and contain a 4-unit apartment and a single-family home. (See attached.) Planning Guide Plan designation: LDA, Low Density Residential Attached Zoning: R-1, Single-Dwelling Unit District Parking Each unit would have two enclosed parking spaces. Limited parking space would be available in front of the garages, and on the street. The project would be code compliant with two enclosed spaces per unit. Site Circulation Access to all the housing units would be off the alley in the back of the homes. There are no sidewalks in this area, and no sidewalk is proposed on the City’s pedestrian plan. The capacity of the existing street would support the addition of five units on this block. The level of service would not be impacted. (See attached pedestrian plan.) Landscaping Based on the perimeter of the site 18 over-story trees would be required. The site plan shows 26 existing and proposed over-story trees around the perimeter of the site. This included the preservation of the existing pine trees along 52nd Street, as recommended by the City Council. STAFF REPORT Page 3 Grading/Drainage/Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be acceptable subject to the comments and conditions outlined in the attached engineering memo. Any approvals of this project would be subject to review and approval of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed Districts, as they are the City’s review authority over the grading of the site. Building/Building Material The building materials would be a variety combination of a masonry veneer and composite siding. The architecture is intended to be reminiscent of urban brownstones. The walkways and front stoops would be concrete, driveways asphalt, and garage doors paneled. (See attached renderings.) The applicant will have a materials board for the Planning Commission to review at the Planning Commission meeting. Height The proposed height is 2-1/2 stories meet the standards for height in the PRD-3 Zoning District. Height would be 33 feet to the top of the gable, 30 feet to the mid-point of the roof. Compliance Table City Standard (R-1/PCD) Proposed Front – Hankerson Ave. Front – 52nd Avenue Side – North Side/Rear – West 35/35 feet 20/35 feet 10/35 feet 25/35 feet 35 feet (porch 30’) 32 feet 12 feet* 21 feet* Building Height 3 stories & 36 feet 2-1/2 stories & 33 feet Building Coverage .30 .42* Density – Comp. Plan 8 units per acre 11.9** Density – PRD-3 District 1 unit per 2,900 s.f. = 10 units 8 units *Flexibility through the PUD **Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment To accommodate the request, a Comprehensive Plan amendment is requested to Medium Density Residential. The Medium Density Residential District allows between 5-12 units per STAFF REPORT Page 4 acre. The map below shows how the Comprehensive Plan would be amended to accommodate the change in designation. The proposed amendment is reasonable given its proximity to the Grandview District. The property to the south is guided high density residential and the east is property guided MXC Mixed Use Center. The Medium Density Designation is the same density as what is on the site today. The increase is from 5 units to 8 units on the site. Existing Land Use Plan Site Site Proposed Land Use Plan Change STAFF REPORT Page 5 MDR Medium-Density Residential Applies to attached housing (townhouses, quads, etc.) and multi-family complexes of moderate density. May also include small institutional uses. In new development or redevelopment, improve integration of multi-family housing into an interconnected street network and work to create an attractive, pedestrian-friendly street edge. 5 - 12 residential dwelling units/acre PUD Rezoning The applicant is requesting a rezoning of this site to PUD, Planned Unit Development District (See attached draft PUD Ordinance.) Per Chapter 36 of the City Code the following are the regulations for a PUD: 1. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of the PUD District is to provide comprehensive procedures and standards intended to allow more creativity and flexibility in site plan design than would be possible under a conventional zoning district. The decision to zone property to PUD is a public policy decision for the City Council to make in its legislative capacity. The purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; STAFF REPORT Page 6 e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; f. preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development; h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and i. ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. The project would be a vast improvement over the existing conditions of the site; the buildings provide an appropriate transition from the high-density development to the south to the duplexes to the west and single-family homes to the north. The project would provide a housing type the City has not seen much development of. It is the “missing middle” type housing option identified in the Comprehensive Plan. “Examples of housing types may include “missing middle” housing options – a range of multi-unit or clustered housing types compatible in scale with single-family homes that help meet the growing demand for walkable urban living. These housing options may include co- housing, duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, and other smaller scale multifamily types. Ways to reduce housing costs could include modular building.” 2. Applicability/Criteria a. Uses. All permitted uses, permitted accessory uses, conditional uses, and uses allowed by administrative permit contained in the various zoning districts defined in this Title shall be treated as potentially allowable uses within a PUD district, provided they would be allowable on the site under the Comprehensive Plan. Uses allowed would be allowed under at PCD-2 and PCD-3 Zoning Districts which were previously considered for this site. The Medium Density classification of the site suggests “attached housing (townhouses, quads, etc.) and multi-family complexes of moderate density.” b. Eligibility Standards. To be eligible for a PUD district, all development should be in compliance with the following: i. where the site of a proposed PUD is designated for more than one (1) land use in the Comprehensive Plan, the City may require that the PUD include all the land uses so designated or such combination of the designated uses as the City Council shall deem appropriate to achieve the purposes of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; The proposal would not include a mixture of land uses. However, it would include a housing type that the City has not seen much construction of over the past 20 years. As described above would provide “missing middle” type housing. STAFF REPORT Page 7 ii. any PUD which involves a single land use type or housing type may be permitted provided that it is otherwise consistent with the objectives of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; Staff believes this housing development provides a housing type that is needed in the Comprehensive Plan. (See Comprehensive Plan findings on pages 8-10 below.) iii. permitted densities may be specifically stated in the appropriate planned development designation and shall be in general conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; and The proposed building density would be 11.9 units per acre and consistent with the Medium Density Designation in the Comprehensive Plan. iv. the setback regulation, building coverage and floor area ratio of the most closely related conventional zoning district shall be considered presumptively appropriate, but may be departed from to accomplish the purpose and intent described in #1 above. The proposed project does require variances from the already established standards in the R-1 or PCD District. For the reasons stated above, staff believes the purpose and intend of the PUD Ordinance is met. PRIMARY ISSUES/STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues • Is the Comprehensive Plan Amendment reasonable? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for the following reasons: 1. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Multifamily Residential Single-Family Attached. This land use consists of residential units with common walls, where each unit has direct exterior access. In Edina the most common buildings of this type are townhouses and duplexes (two-family dwellings). Townhouses tend to be clustered close to highway or major road corridors, while duplexes are often found in narrow strips along major thoroughfares such as Vernon and France Avenues, and serve as a buffer for adjacent single-family neighborhood detached housing. b. Multifamily. This land use is defined by the multiple-unit building type where each individual unit does not have direct ground floor access to the exterior. Multifamily STAFF REPORT Page 8 developments are concentrated primarily along the main traffic arteries and are generally located toward the edges of the city, often in proximity to retail business establishments. Concentrations of multifamily developments are found along York Avenue, France Avenue, Vernon Avenue, Lincoln Drive, and Cahill Road. c. Integration of multi-unit housing into transitional areas. In the past, duplexes were located along many major thoroughfares in Edina as a kind of buffer or transition to the adjacent single-family housing. Today this housing type is in need of updating or replacement in many locations, and high land and redevelopment costs create pressure for higher-density housing types. Townhouse complexes have been constructed in locations such as north France Avenue. The challenge is that in many locations the duplexes are only one lot deep, which makes it difficult to provide an adequate transition to single-family scale. The following sections broadly address the issue of integrating multi-unit housing into lower-density, primarily single-family neighborhood transitional areas. d. Single-family characteristics. Attached and multifamily housing should emulate single-family housing in its basic architectural elements – pitched roofs, articulated facades, visible entrances, porches or balconies. Taller buildings should step down to provide a height transition to existing adjacent residential buildings. Multifamily housing can be scaled to be compatible with lower density neighborhoods. Multifamily housing can emulate architectural elements of neighborhood context. STAFF REPORT Page 9 e. Level of formality. Design the front and back facades with appropriate levels of formality. The front, as the more public side of the house, will receive the more formal treatment, with the main entrance, porch or steps and landscaping, while trash/recycling storage, play equipment and outdoor storage should be located in the back. f. Parking to the rear. Where rear-loaded or detached garages predominate, parking spaces and garages should be located to the rear of the lot or interior of the block. If this is infeasible, garages should be recessed some distance behind the main façade of the house and surface parking should be placed within side yards to the extent feasible. g. Maintaining community character. With the changing ways people are living, working, and using spaces, there will be changes in how land uses function – both in new and renovated spaces. Edina is frequently on the forefront of innovative practices, particularly related to sustainability and technology. However, this will require some flexibility in development standards. One of the goals of innovating may be to find ways to accommodate missing housing types or to let housing be produced more affordably. Examples of housing types may include “missing middle” housing options – a range of multi-unit or clustered housing types compatible in scale with single-family homes that help meet the growing demand for walkable urban living. These housing options may include co-housing, duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, and other smaller scale multifamily types. Ways to reduce housing costs could include modular building styles that take advantage of efficiencies in the construction process. h. Future Housing Needs. Edina’s Cities of the Future (2015) report described trends that are shaping the demand for housing in the city. It envisions a future where housing is integrated into mixed use neighborhoods, better meeting the needs of smaller households with fewer children, and an aging population. Characteristics of new housing may include: • New housing options primarily are provided as attached (multifamily) apartments and townhouses and small detached lots, with a variety of sizes, uses, and resident types. 2. The proposed amendment is reasonable given its proximity to the Grandview District. The property to the south is guided high density residential and the east is property guided MXC Mixed Use Center. 3. The proposed amendment would allow a development that would create a reasonable land use transition to the single-family residential area to the north. High Density Development is located to the south and east, by developing townhouses at the same height as would be allowed in the single-dwelling unit district would provide a transition and buffer to the single-family homes to the north. Parking to the rear can create attractive pedestrian oriented environments. STAFF REPORT Page 10 4. The Medium-Density Residential District allows between 5-12 units per acre. The proposal is 11.9 units per acre. 5. A pedestrian and street connection with Vernon Avenue to Jerry’s is proposed in the Grandview Development Framework and Grandview Transportation Study. (See attached pages from both studies.) Higher Densities are typically found near or on streets with higher traffic volume like Vernon Avenue. The Illustration is a rendering of that future connection from the Grandview Transportation Study: 6. Additional density would support the retail uses in the district. • Is the Rezoning to PUD reasonable? Yes. Staff believes the proposed Rezoning is reasonable for the following reasons: 1. Zoning would provide an appropriate transition from the apartments to the south to the duplexes and single-family homes to the west and north. Proposed heights and setbacks are consistent with the R-1 Zoning to the north. 2. The proposed project would meet the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan as listed above on pages 7-10. 3. The site is unique in its proximity to the Grandview District and higher density development. A recommendation in the Grandview Transportation Plan is that a 52nd Street pedestrian and/or vehicular connection be made to Vernon Avenue. Higher densities are typically located on higher capacity streets and commercial areas. 4. The proposed buildings have been designed to fit the neighborhood and would provide a reasonable transition from the high-density apartments to the south and bank to the east. Site STAFF REPORT Page 11 Options for consideration Denial Comprehensive Plan Recommend the City Council deny the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to re-guide the site from low density attached to medium density, which would allow the proposed 11.9 units per acre. Denial is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed density is too high for the site. Land uses to the west and north are low density residential. Introducing medium density residential is not reasonable for this block. 2. This neighborhood is isolated from the Grandview District. The connection from 52nd Street to Vernon has not yet been made. Rezoning Recommend the City Council Deny the Rezoning. Denial is based on the following findings: 1. The existing 4-unit apartment and single-dwelling unit are reasonable uses of the existing properties. 2. The proposed density is too high for the site. 3. Building coverage is too high for this site. 4. The proposal does not meet the criteria for a PUD, Planned Unit Developemnt. Approval Comprehensive Plan Recommend the City Council approve the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to re-guide the site from low density attached to medium density, which would allow the proposed 11.9 units per acre. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed amendment is reasonable given its proximity to the Grandview District. The property to the south is guided high density residential and the east is property guided MXC Mixed Use Center. 2. The proposed amendment would allow a development that would create a reasonable land use transition to the single-family residential area to the north. High Density Development is located to the south and east, by developing townhouses at the same height as would be allowed in the single-dwelling unit district would provide a transition and buffer to the single-family homes to the north. STAFF REPORT Page 12 3. Additional density would help support the retail uses in the district. 4. The Medium-Density Residential District allows between 5-12 units per acre. The proposal is 11.9 units per acre. 5. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Multifamily Residential Single-Family Attached. This land use consists of residential units with common walls, where each unit has direct exterior access. In Edina the most common buildings of this type are townhouses and duplexes (two-family dwellings). Townhouses tend to be clustered close to highway or major road corridors, while duplexes are often found in narrow strips along major thoroughfares such as Vernon and France Avenues, and serve as a buffer for adjacent single-family neighborhood detached housing. b. Multifamily. This land use is defined by the multiple-unit building type where each individual unit does not have direct ground floor access to the exterior. Multifamily developments are concentrated primarily along the main traffic arteries and are generally located toward the edges of the city, often in proximity to retail business establishments. Concentrations of multifamily developments are found along York Avenue, France Avenue, Vernon Avenue, Lincoln Drive, and Cahill Road. c. Integration of multi-unit housing into transitional areas. In the past, duplexes were located along many major thoroughfares in Edina as a kind of buffer or transition to the adjacent single-family housing. Today this housing type is in need of updating or replacement in many locations, and high land and redevelopment costs create pressure for higher-density housing types. Townhouse complexes have been constructed in locations such as north France Avenue. The challenge is that in many locations the duplexes are only one lot deep, which makes it difficult to provide an adequate transition to single-family scale. The following sections broadly address the issue of integrating multi-unit housing into lower-density, primarily single-family neighborhood transitional areas. d. Single-family characteristics. Attached and multifamily housing should emulate single- family housing in its basic architectural elements – pitched roofs, articulated facades, visible entrances, porches or balconies. Taller buildings should step down to provide a height transition to existing adjacent residential buildings. e. Level of formality. Design the front and back facades with appropriate levels of formality. The front, as the more public side of the house, will receive the more formal treatment, with the main entrance, porch or steps and landscaping, while trash/recycling storage, play equipment and outdoor storage should be located in the back. f. Parking to the rear. Where rear-loaded or detached garages predominate, parking spaces and garages should be located to the rear of the lot or interior of the block. If STAFF REPORT Page 13 this is infeasible, garages should be recessed some distance behind the main façade of the house and surface parking should be placed within side yards to the extent feasible. g. Maintaining community character. With the changing ways people are living, working, and using spaces, there will be changes in how land uses function – both in new and renovated spaces. Edina is frequently on the forefront of innovative practices, particularly related to sustainability and technology. However, this will require some flexibility in development standards. One of the goals of innovating may be to find ways to accommodate missing housing types or to let housing be produced more affordably. Examples of housing types may include “missing middle” housing options – a range of multi-unit or clustered housing types compatible in scale with single-family homes that help meet the growing demand for walkable urban living. These housing options may include co-housing, duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, and other smaller scale multifamily types. Ways to reduce housing costs could include modular building styles that take advantage of efficiencies in the construction process. h. Future Housing Needs. Edina’s Cities of the Future (2015) report described trends that are shaping the demand for housing in the city. It envisions a future where housing is integrated into mixed use neighborhoods, better meeting the needs of smaller households with fewer children, and an aging population. Characteristics of new housing may include: • New housing options primarily are provided as attached (multifamily) apartments and townhouses and small detached lots, with a variety of sizes, uses, and resident types. Rezoning Recommend the City Council Approve the Rezoning to PUD and Preliminary Site Plan. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The site is unique in its proximity to the Grandview District and higher density development. A recommendation in the Grandview Transportation Plan is that 52nd Street connect to Vernon Avenue by pedestrian or vehicle. Higher densities are typically located on higher capacity streets and commercial areas. 2. The proposed buildings have been designed to fit the neighborhood and would provide a reasonable transition from the high-density apartments to the south and bank to the east. 3. The front setbacks would be consistent to the single-family homes to the north. 4. Provides a housing type not being developed in the City. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: STAFF REPORT Page 14 1. The Final Development Plans must be consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated May 4, 2020, and the materials board as presented to the Planning Commission. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies after the project is built. 3. Compliance with all the conditions outlined in the city engineer’s memo dated May 18, 2020 and the building official’s memo dated May 11, 2020. 4. Approval of a Site Improvement Performance Agreement at Final approval, 5. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 6. Final Rezoning is contingent on the Metropolitan Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendments. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning and Variances subject to the findings and conditions above. Deadline for a city decision: August 18, 2020 DRAFT ORDINANCE FOR CONSIDERATION JUNE 16, 2020 ORDINANCE NO. 2020-04 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH THE PUD-20, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-20 ZONING DISTRICT The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Chapter 36, Article VIII, Division 4 is hereby amended to add the following: Sec. 36-507 Planned Unit Development District-20 (PUD-20) – 4100 76TH Apartments (a) Legal description: The South Half of Lot 8 and all of Lots 9, 10, 11 and 12, Block 9, Brookside Heights, Hennepin County, Minnesota (b) Approved Plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the re-development plans, dated May 4, 2020 except as amended by City Council Resolution No. 2020-____ on file in the Office of the Planning Department. (c) Principal Uses: Multi-family Townhomes/Condos. (d) Accessory Uses: All accessory uses allowed in the R1 Zoning District. (e) Conditional Uses: None (f) Signs shall be regulated per the R-1 Zoning District. 2 (g) Development Standards. In addition to the development standards per the R-1 Zoning District, the following shall apply: Standard Front – Hankerson Ave. Front – 52nd Avenue Side – North Side/Rear – West 35 feet (porch 30’) 32 feet 12 feet 20 feet Building Height 2-1/2 stories & 33 feet Building Coverage .45 Density 8 units Section 2. This ordinance is effective upon approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment by the Metropolitan Council. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2020-63 RESOLUTION APPROVING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO RE-GUIDE 5132 & 5136-48 HANKERSON AVENUE FROM LOW DENSITY ATTACHED TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Donnay Homes, Inc., on behalf of Elizabeth and Peter MacDonagh is proposing to redevelop the property at the corner of Hankerson Avenue and 52nd Street West. (5132 and 5136-48 Hankerson Avenue; See attached property location.) 1.02 The proposal is to tear down the existing two-story four-unit apartment at 5136-48 Hankerson and the single-family home at 5132 Hankerson, and build two four unit, two and a half-story townhomes. 1.03 The applicant revised their original plans by eliminating two units out of the project and propose two separate 4-unit buildings to create more greenspace and preserve trees on south side of the property. The revisions change the previous request from a high-density designation to medium density. 1.04 The two properties are currently zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District; the four- unit apartment is an existing nonconforming use. The site is guided low density attached residential, which allows between 4-8 units per acre. The properties total .67 acres or 29,185 square feet in size. The existing density is 7.4 units per acre, which would fit the medium density range (5-12 units per acre). The proposed density would increase to 11.9 units per acre; therefore, this request would require a comprehensive plan amendment. 1.05 To accommodate the request, the following amendment to the Comprehensive Plan is requested: A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to re-guide the site from low density attached to medium density residential, which would allow the proposed 11.9 units per acre project. 1.06 On May 27, 2020, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Vote: 7 Ayes and 0 Nays. 1.07 On June 16, the City Council held a public hearing and considered the request. RESOLUTION NO. 2020-63 Page 2 Section 2. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved that the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Comprehensive Plan amendment to re-guide 5132 and 5136-48 Hankerson Avenue from low density attached to medium density residential, subject to Metropolitan Council approval: Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed amendment is reasonable given its proximity to the Grandview District. The property to the south is guided high density residential and the east is property guided MXC Mixed Use Center. 2. The proposed amendment would allow a development that would create a reasonable land use transition to the single-family residential area to the north. High Density Development is located to the south and east, by developing townhouses at the same height as would be allowed in the single-dwelling unit district would provide a transition and buffer to the single- family homes to the north. 3. Additional density would help support the retail uses in the district. 4. The Medium-Density Residential District allows between 5-12 units per acre. The proposal is 11.9 units per acre. 5. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Multifamily Residential Single-Family Attached. This land use consists of residential units with common walls, where each unit has direct exterior access. In Edina the most common buildings of this type are townhouses and duplexes (two-family dwellings). Townhouses tend to be clustered close to highway or major road corridors, while duplexes are often found in narrow strips along major thoroughfares such as Vernon and France Avenues, and serve as a buffer for adjacent single-family neighborhood detached housing. b. Multifamily. This land use is defined by the multiple-unit building type where each individual unit does not have direct ground floor access to the exterior. Multifamily developments are concentrated primarily along the main traffic arteries and are generally located toward the edges of the city, often in proximity to retail business establishments. Concentrations of multifamily developments are found along York Avenue, France Avenue, Vernon Avenue, Lincoln Drive, and Cahill Road. c. Integration of multi-unit housing into transitional areas. In the past, duplexes were located along many major thoroughfares in Edina as a kind of buffer or transition to the adjacent single-family housing. Today this housing type is in need of updating or replacement in many locations, and high land and redevelopment costs create pressure for higher-density housing types. Townhouse complexes have been constructed in locations such as north France Avenue. The challenge is that in many locations the duplexes are only one lot deep, which makes it difficult to provide an adequate transition to single-family scale. The following sections broadly address the issue RESOLUTION NO. 2020-63 Page 3 of integrating multi-unit housing into lower-density, primarily single-family neighborhood transitional areas. d. Single-family characteristics. Attached and multifamily housing should emulate single-family housing in its basic architectural elements – pitched roofs, articulated facades, visible entrances, porches or balconies. Taller buildings should step down to provide a height transition to existing adjacent residential buildings. e. Level of formality. Design the front and back facades with appropriate levels of formality. The front, as the more public side of the house, will receive the more formal treatment, with the main entrance, porch or steps and landscaping, while trash/recycling storage, play equipment and outdoor storage should be located in the back. f. Parking to the rear. Where rear-loaded or detached garages predominate, parking spaces and garages should be located to the rear of the lot or interior of the block. If this is infeasible, garages should be recessed some distance behind the main façade of the house and surface parking should be placed within side yards to the extent feasible. g. Maintaining community character. With the changing ways people are living, working, and using spaces, there will be changes in how land uses function – both in new and renovated spaces. Edina is frequently on the forefront of innovative practices, particularly related to sustainability and technology. However, this will require some flexibility in development standards. One of the goals of innovating may be to find ways to accommodate missing housing types or to let housing be produced more affordably. Examples of housing types may include “missing middle” housing options – a range of multi-unit or clustered housing types compatible in scale with single-family homes that help meet the growing demand for walkable urban living. These housing options may include co-housing, duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, and other smaller scale multifamily types. Ways to reduce housing costs could include modular building styles that take advantage of efficiencies in the construction process. h. Future Housing Needs. Edina’s Cities of the Future (2015) report described trends that are shaping the demand for housing in the city. It envisions a future where housing is integrated into mixed use neighborhoods, better meeting the needs of smaller households with fewer children, and an aging population. Characteristics of new housing may include: • New housing options primarily are provided as attached (multifamily) apartments and townhouses and small detached lots, with a variety of sizes, uses, and resident types. Approval is conditioned on the following: 1. Approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment by the Metropolitan Council. RESOLUTION NO. 2020-63 Page 4 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on July 21, 2020. ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 21, 2020, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2020. _________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2020-64 APPROVING PRELIMINARY REZONING FROM R-1, SINGLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT TO PUD, PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL AT 5132 & 5136-48 HANKERSON AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Donnay Homes, Inc., on behalf of Elizabeth and Peter MacDonagh is proposing to redevelop the property at the corner of Hankerson Avenue and 52nd Street West. (5132 and 5136-48 Hankerson Avenue) 1.02 The proposal is to tear down the existing two-story four-unit apartment at 5136-48 Hankerson and the single-family home at 5132 Hankerson, and build two four unit, two and a half-story townhomes. 1.03 The applicant has revised their original plans by eliminating two units out of the project and propose two separate 4-unit buildings to create more greenspace and preserve trees on south side of the property. The revisions change the previous request from a high-density designation to medium density. 1.04 The two properties are currently zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District; the four- unit apartment is an existing nonconforming use. The site is guided low density attached residential, which allows between 4-8 units per acre. The properties total .67 acres or 29,185 square feet in size. The existing density is 7.4 units per acre, which would fit the medium density range (5-12 units per acre). The proposed density would increase to 11.9 units per acre; therefore, this request would require a comprehensive plan amendment. 1.05 To accommodate the request, the following is requested: A Rezoning from R-1, Single-Dwelling Unit District to PUD, Planned Unit Development and Preliminary Site Plan 1.06 On May 27, 2020, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Vote: 7 Ayes and 0 Nays. 1.07 On June 16, 2020 the City Council held a public hearing and considered the request. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: RESOLUTION NO. 2020-64 Page 2 1. The site is unique in its proximity to the Grandview District and higher density development. A recommendation in the Grandview Transportation Plan is that 52nd Street connect to Vernon Avenue by pedestrian or vehicle. Higher densities are typically located on higher capacity streets and commercial areas. 2. The proposed buildings have been designed to fit the neighborhood and would provide a reasonable transition from the high-density apartments to the south and bank to the east. 3. The front setbacks would be consistent to the single-family homes to the north. 4. Provides a housing type not being developed in the City. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Preliminary Rezoning from R-1, Single-Dwelling Unit District to PUD, Planned Unit Development District, and Preliminary Site Plan approval. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The Final Development Plans must be consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated May 4, 2020, and the materials board as presented to the Planning Commission. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies after the project is built. 3. Compliance with all the conditions outlined in the city engineer’s memo dated May 18, 2020 and the building official’s memo dated May 11, 2020. 4. Approval of a Site Improvement Performance Agreement at Final approval, 5. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 6. Final Rezoning is contingent on the Metropolitan Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendments. RESOLUTION NO. 2020-64 Page 3 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on July 21, 2020. ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 21, 2020, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2020. _________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk DATE: 5/18/2020 TO: Cary Teague – Community Development Director FROM: Zuleyka Marquez, PE – Graduate Engineer RE: 5132-5148 Hankerson Ave – Development Review, Revision 1 The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for pedestrian facilities, utility connections, grading, and storm water. Revised plans reviewed were existing conditions survey, site plan, preliminary plat, grading plan, utility plan, and erosion control plans dated 5/4/2020. Review Comment Required For General 1. Deliver as-built records of public and private utility infrastructure post construction. Certificate of Occupancy Survey 2. An existing and proposed site condition survey is required. Grading/Building Permit 3. Show all existing and proposed public and private easements. Drainage & utility easement will be required. Grading/Building Permit Living Streets 4. Reserved Traffic and Street 5. Applicant proposes to remove two existing driveway entrances. Curb to be replaced Edina Standard Plate 500. Applicant proposes eight 20’-driveway entrances from the alley. Driveway entrances to be completed per Edina Standard Plate 400. Certificate of Occupancy 6. Hankerson Ave and 52nd St W were milled and overlaid in 2019. Road patching shall conform to Edina Standard Plates 525, 541, and 544. Mill and overlay for one cohesive street repair. Certificate of Occupancy Sanitary and Water Utilities 7. Domestic water shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 8. Domestic sanitary shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 9. Due to individual ownership proposed, City is requiring one water and sanitary service per residential unit. Water service shall be a minimum of 1-inch. Reuse existing services where possible. A minimum of 3’ horizontal spacing is required between services. Applicant to make a straight connection from the curb Prior to Starting Utility Work stop/cleanout to the respective mains. Do not cluster as proposed. Apply for sewer and water connection permits with Public Works Department. 10. Comply with Public Works Department installation methods. Certificate of Occupancy 11. The majority of the sanitary main along Hankerson Ave is VCP. Line existing clay laterals if reusing. Certificate of Occupancy 12. Remove all abandoned sanitary and water services to the main. Four water connections and five sanitary connections total for the two properties. Certificate of Occupancy 13. A SAC and WAC determination will be required by the Metropolitan Council. The SAC determination will be used by the City to calculate sewer and water connection charges. Grading/Building Permit Stormwater Utility 14. Provide geotechnical report with soil borings. Grading/Building Permit 15. Provide hydraulic and hydrologic report meeting watershed and state construction site permit requirements. Grading/Building Permit 16. Submit watershed district permit and copies of private maintenance agreement in favor of watershed. Grading/Building Permit 17. A sump line connection permit and inspection will be required. Connection must be core drilled. Prior to Storm Sewer Connection Grading Erosion and Sediment Control 18. Submit a SWPPP consistent with the state general construction site stormwater permit. Grading/Building Permit Constructability and Safety 19. Submit construction staging and traffic control. Grading/Building Permit Other Agency Coordination 20. Apply for Hennepin County, MDH, MPCA and MCES permits as needed. Grading/Building Permit 21. Watermain installed 1953. Properties were homesteaded in 1954 and 1958. Well not likely onsite. 22. Apply for a Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. Grading/Building Permit May 11, 2020 Cary Teague, Community Development Director David Fisher, Chief Building Official & Rick Hammerschmidt, Fire Marshall Hankerson Townhome residential townhomes. Information / Background: Two four-unit townhome buildings will have separate PIDs for each unit. -This would be an R-3 building using the International Residential Code. -A separate water and sewer service and permit are required for each unit. -A minimum of a 13-D fire sprinkler system must be installed based on the National Fire Protection Association 2016 edition. -Provide the required size of the domestic water line for each unit to ensure it can meet the hydraulic calculations for domestic water use and the 13D fire sprinkler system. -New address numbers will be required. -Recommend escrow is provided with the demo and new building permits to assure City standards are met for code compliance. 961.0964.8967.2966.4967.6967.9968.7tcc954.66tcc954.27tcc960.60INV=950.81INV=950.62INV=950.48INV=950.45INV=951.41INV=946.56INV=946.55SSanitary Manholerim=954.32SSanitary Manholerim=954.07INV=945.84SSanitary Manholerim=960.03tcc961.37tcc960.49tcc960.01tcc958.58tcc957.24tcc955.84tcc954.45tcc954.18tcc954.14tcc954.30Gate Valvetcc956.22tcc958.08959.9958.1957.2957.9956.5956.3957.2957.6958.5958.2SignSignLightPolePowerPoletwin" 18961.617" pine960.322" three961.6959.7958.4961.5A/CA/C962.1962.1962.0962.0961.2960.1FFE964.4ColumnColumn5" oak961.78" oak961.9962.636" elm963.6Gate Valve960.4GF961.5GuyAnchorTtped960.7Sign960.4PowerPolePowerPoleGGasMeterA/CA/C958.6962.5A/C961.030" maple964.3FFE965.4963.4968.1EElec.Meter7" spruce967.7A/C968.3964.6GF964.7964.6966.2GGasMeter964.012" ash963.7967.3FFE969.0967.5965.9966.7967.9967.9EElec.Meter968.0GF968.6tnh957.62Timber WallTimber WallFence on line+-WallF e n c epaversWood FenceWood Fence 22.123.624.09.613.520.80.58.120.642.09.9 4.018.1 33.64.99.338.112.14.06.012.144.043.94.012.138.112.16.042.121.922.042.0B A L C O N YB A L C O N YC o n c r e t eC o n c r e t e C o n c r e t eC o n c r e t eC o n c r e t eConcreteWallsB i t u m i n o u s B i t u m i n o u sOverhead WiresOverhead WiresOverhead Wires Overhead WiresOverhead WiresOverhead Wires20.1 4.734.935.057.034.1Overhead WiresS t o n e sS t o n e s6.5 35.030.34-UNIT BUILDINGNo.5136,5140,5144 & 51482-STORY 1-STORYRESIDENCENo. 5124GARAGE1-STORYRESIDENCENo. 5132GARAGEHANKERSON AVENUE52ND STREET W.A L L E YConcrete CurbConcrete Curbcant.Stone WellStone Wells65.8 window WellSanitary Sewer12" StormN 00°07'17" W 225.00 N 89°49'57" E 130.46N 89°47'06" E 130.95N 00°00'12" E 225.11 14.014960956958 960958962 9629649669629649669689 6 09549 5 6 95852010101020Catch BasinCatch Basins962.0967.6966.8966.6966.3965.75964.9964.0963.1Exisiting HardcoverLot Area29,416 sq ftBuilding-51322,215 sq ft4-unit Building2,154 sq ftBalconies439 sq ftGarage924 sq ftTotal5,732 sq ftPercentage19.49%F:\survey\brookside heights - henn\8-12-9 brookside height\01 Surveying - 88603\01 CAD\01 Source\01 Survey Base.dwgFile No.F.B. No. 1109-46 inv. 88603ACertification Legal DescriptionPrepared this 24th day of January 2020.EXISTING CONDITIONSEXISTING CONDITIONS - HANKERSON TOWNHOMESPersonnel basis of bearings is assumedLegendx000.07601 73rd Avenue NorthMinneapolis, Minnesota 55428(763) 560-3093DemarcInc.comSCALE IN FEET20040Benchmark: Top nut of hydrant at Hankerson Ave. S. and52nd Street W.Elevation = 957.62First Floor of No. 5132 = 965.4 feetDONNAY HOMES9655 63RD AVENUE NORTHMAPLE GROVE, MN 55369The South Half of Lot 8 and all of Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12, Block 9, BROOKSIDE HEIGHTSHennepin County, Minnesota Signed: ____________________________________________ Gregory R. Prasch Registration No. 24992The only easements shown are from plats of record or information provided by client.I certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly Licensed land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota.HANKERSON TOWNHOMESdrawn by:J. DyerSurveyor:DemarcSurveying and Engineering7601 73rd Avenue N.Brooklyn Park, MN 55428Attn: Greg Praschphone: 763-560-3093fax: 763-560-3522e-mail: gregprasch@demarcinc.comDenotes Found Iron MonumentDenotes Iron Monument SetBollardLightPower PoleSanitary ManholeStorm ManholeWater ManholeCatch BasinGas MainUnderground CommunicationsUnderground ElectricSanitary SewerStorm SewerWatermainOverhead WiresDenotes Existing ContoursSHEET INDEX Sheet 1 - Existing Conditions Survey Sheet 2 - Site Plan Sheet 3 - Preliminary Plat Sheet 4 - R-1 Lots within 500 feet of Subject Property Sheet 5 - Grading & Stormwater Erosion Control Plan Sheet 6 - Utility Plan Sheet 7 - Tree Protection PlanDeveloper:Donnay Homes9655 63rd Avenue NorthMaple Grove, MN 55369Attn: Steve Benke612.290.5570Property Owner:Peter & Elizabeth Macdonagh5132 Hankerson AvenueEdina, MN 55436 12'0"2'0"8'0"34'6"12'0"7'6"12'0"30'0"20'0"74'0"Proposed BuildingAtriumPorch 12'0"2'0"8'0"34'6"12'0"7'6"12'0"30'0"20'0"74'0"Proposed BuildingAtriumPorch 12'0"2'0"8'0"34'6"12'0"7'6"12'0"30'0"20'0"74'0"Proposed BuildingAtriumPorch 12'0"2'0"8'0"34'6"12'0"7'6"12'0"30'0"20'0"74'0"Proposed BuildingAtriumPorch 12'0"2'0"8'0"34'6"12'0"7'6"12'0"30'0"20'0"74'0"Proposed BuildingAtriumPorch 12'0"2'0"8'0"34'6"12'0"7'6"12'0"30'0"20'0"74'0"Proposed BuildingAtriumPorch 12'0"2'0"8'0"34'6"12'0"7'6"12'0"30'0"20'0"74'0"Proposed BuildingAtriumPorch 12'0"2'0"8'0"34'6"12'0"7'6"12'0"30'0"20'0"74'0"Proposed BuildingAtriumPorch961.0964.8967.2966.4967.6967.9968.7tcc954.66tcc954.27tcc960.60INV=950.81INV=950.62INV=950.48INV=950.45INV=951.41INV=946.56INV=946.55SSanitary Manholerim=954.32SSanitary Manholerim=954.07INV=945.84SSanitary Manholerim=960.03tcc961.37tcc960.49tcc960.01tcc958.58tcc957.24tcc955.84tcc954.45tcc954.18tcc954.14tcc954.30Gate Valvetcc956.22tcc958.08tcc961.31959.9958.1957.2957.9956.5956.3957.2957.6958.5958.2SignSignLightPolePowerPoletwin" 18961.617" pine960.3959.7958.4961.5962.1962.1962.0962.0961.2960.1962.6Gate Valve960.4GuyAnchorTtped960.7960.4PowerPolePowerPole958.6962.5961.0963.4968.1968.3964.6964.6966.2964.012" ash963.7967.3FFE969.0967.5965.9966.7967.9967.9EElec.Meter968.0GF968.6tnh957.62Timber WallFence on line+-WallB i t u m i n o u s B i t u m i n o u sOverhead Wires Overhead WiresOverhead WiresOverhead Wires35.030.3 1-STORYRESIDENCENo. 5124GARAGEHANKERSON AVENUE52ND STREET W.A L L E YConcrete CurbConcrete CurbSanitary Sewer12" StormN 00°07'17" W 225.00 N 89°49'57" E 130.46N 89°47'06" E 130.95N 00°00'12" E 225.11 14.014960956958 960958962 962964966962964966968 9 6 09549 5 6 958520101096095896296496096296496696296496696896896496635.212.512.521.310 20968.5968.5968.5968.5966.4965.7965.0964.3960.5 960.5 961.9 961.9 963.6 963.6 963.6 963.6Catch BasinCatch Basins962.0Main Floor969.8Main Floor969.8Main Floor969.8Main Floor969.8Main Floor967.8Main Floor967.8Main Floor966.4Main Floor966.4967.6966.8966.6966.3965.75964.9964.0963.14.0% ±5.0% ±7.7% ±10% ±7.7% ±7.7% ±8.6% ±9.5% ±21.932.532.6 35.0966.3TW 966.0Proposed HardcoverLot Area29,416 sq ftPorches448 sq ftConcrete Atriums720 sq ftBuildings10,992 sq ftTotal12,160 sq ftPercentage41.34%F:\survey\brookside heights - henn\8-12-9 brookside height\01 Surveying - 88603\01 CAD\01 Source\01 Survey Base.dwgFile No.F.B. No. 1109-46 inv. 88603ACertification Legal DescriptionPrepared this 24th day of January 2020.SITE PLANSITE PLAN - HANKERSON TOWNHOMESPersonnel basis of bearings is assumedLegendx000.0Existing HardcoverLot Area29,416 sq ftBuilding-51322,215 sq ft4-Unit Building2,154 sq ftBalconies439 sq ftGarage924 sq ftTotal5,732 sq ftPercentage19.49%7601 73rd Avenue NorthMinneapolis, Minnesota 55428(763) 560-3093DemarcInc.comSCALE IN FEET20040Benchmark: Top nut of hydrant at Hankerson Ave. S. and52nd Street W.Elevation = 957.62First Floor of No. 5132 = 965.4 feetDONNAY HOMES9655 63RD AVENUE NORTHMAPLE GROVE, MN 55369The South Half of Lot 8 and all of Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12, Block 9, BROOKSIDE HEIGHTSHennepin County, Minnesota Signed: ____________________________________________ Gregory R. Prasch Registration No. 24992The only easements shown are from plats of record or information provided by client.I certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly Licensed land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota.HANKERSON TOWNHOMESdrawn by:J. DyerSurveyor:DemarcSurveying and Engineering7601 73rd Avenue N.Brooklyn Park, MN 55428Attn: Greg Praschphone: 763-560-3093fax: 763-560-3522e-mail: gregprasch@demarcinc.comDenotes Found Iron MonumentDenotes Iron Monument SetBollardLightPower PoleSanitary ManholeStorm ManholeWater ManholeCatch BasinGas MainUnderground CommunicationsUnderground ElectricSanitary SewerStorm SewerWatermainOverhead WiresDenotes Existing ContoursSHEET INDEX Sheet 1 - Existing Conditions Survey Sheet 2 - Site Plan Sheet 3 - Preliminary Plat Sheet 4 - R-1 Lots within 500 feet of Subject Property Sheet 5 - Grading & Stormwater Erosion Control Plan Sheet 6 - Utility Plan Sheet 7 - Tree Protection PlanDeveloper:Donnay Homes9655 63rd Avenue NorthMaple Grove, MN 55369Attn: Steve Benke612.290.5570Property Owner:Peter & Elizabeth Macdonagh5132 Hankerson AvenueEdina, MN 55436REVISED 4-30-20 City CommentsREVISED 5-04-20 City Comments 961.0964.8967.2966.4967.6967.9968.7tcc962.54tcc954.66tcc954.27tcc960.60INV=950.81INV=950.62INV=950.48INV=950.45INV=951.41INV=946.56INV=946.55SSanitary Manholerim=954.32SSanitary Manholerim=954.07INV=945.84SSanitary Manholerim=960.03tcc961.37tcc960.49tcc960.01tcc958.58tcc957.24tcc955.84tcc954.45tcc954.18tcc954.14tcc954.30Gate Valvetcc956.22tcc958.08tcc961.31959.9958.1957.2957.9956.5956.3957.2957.6958.5958.2SignSignLightPolePowerPoletwin" 18961.617" pine960.322" three961.6959.7958.4961.5A/CA/C962.1962.1962.0962.0961.2960.1FFE964.4ColumnColumn5" oak961.78" oak961.9962.636" elm963.6Gate Valve960.4GF961.5GuyAnchorTtped960.7Sign960.4PowerPolePowerPoleGGasMeterA/CA/C958.6962.5A/C961.030" maple964.3FFE965.4963.4968.1EElec.Meter7" spruce967.7A/C968.3964.6GF964.7964.6966.2GGasMeter964.012" ash963.7967.1967.3FFE969.0967.5965.9966.7967.9967.9EElec.Meter968.0GF968.6tnh957.62Timber WallTimber WallFence on line+-WallF e n c epaversWood FenceWood Fence 22.123.624.09.613.520.80.58.120.642.09.9 4.018.133.64.99.338.112.14.06.012.144.043.94.012.138.112.16.042.121.922.042.0B A L C O N YB A L C O N YC o n c r e t eC o n c r e t e C o n c r e t eC o n c r e t eC o n c r e t eConcreteWallsB i t u m i n o u s B i t u m i n o u sOverhead WiresOverhead WiresOverhead Wires Overhead WiresOverhead WiresOverhead Wires20.1 4.734.935.057.034.1Overhead WiresS t o n e sS t o n e s6.5 35.030.34-UNIT BUILDINGNo.5136,5140,5144 & 51482-STORY 1-STORYRESIDENCENo. 5124GARAGE1-STORYRESIDENCENo. 5132GARAGEHANKERSON AVENUE52ND STREET W.A L L E YConcrete CurbConcrete Curbcant.Stone WellStone Wells65.8 window WellSanitary Sewer12" StormN 00°07'17" W 225.00 N 89°49'57" E 130.46N 89°47'06" E 130.95N 00°00'12" E 225.11 14.014960956958962 960 958 962 962 964966962964966968 9 6 09549 5 6 9589625201010N 89°49'57" E 130.84N 89°49'57" E 130.79N 89°49'57" E 130.75N 89°49'57" E 130.62N 89°49'57" E 130.57N 89°49'57" E 130.5332.5020.00 32.5020.00 20.00 20.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.0052.61 52.50 10 20Catch BasinCatch Basins967.6966.8966.6966.3965.75964.9964.0963.1N 89°49'57" E 130.68C:\Users\prasch\Demarc Dropbox\8-12-9 brookside height\01 Surveying - 88603\01 CAD\01 Source\01 Survey Base.dwgFile No.F.B. No. 1109-46 inv. 88603ACertificationDONNAY HOMES9655 63RD AVENUE NORTHMAPLE GROVE, MN 55369 Legal DescriptionThe South Half of Lot 8 and all of Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12, Block 9, BROOKSIDE HEIGHTSHennepin County, Minnesota Signed: ____________________________________________ Gregory R. Prasch Registration No. 24992Prepared this 24th day of January 2020.The only easements shown are from plats of record or information provided by client.I certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly Licensed land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota.PRELIMINARY PLAT Zoning & Development Information7601 73rd Avenue NorthMinneapolis, Minnesota 55428(763) 560-3093DemarcInc.comHANKERSON TOWNHOMESPRELIMINARY PLAT - HANKERSON TOWNHOMESMiscellaneous Notesdrawn by:J. DyerExisting Zoning Classification - R-1 (Single Dwelling Unit District)Proposed Zoning Classification - PUD (Planned Unit Development)Refer to City code for additional requirements and variance information.Proposed Number of Lots = 8Area of proposed: Lot 1, Block 1 = 6,879 sq.ft Lot 2, Block 1 = 2,616 sq.ft Lot 3, Block 1 = 2,615 sq.ft Lot 4, Block 1 = 3,921 sq.ft Lot 5, Block 1 = 3,920 sq.ft Lot 6, Block 1 = 2,612 sq.ft Lot 7, Block 1 = 2,611 sq.ft Lot 8, Block 1 = 4,242 sq.ft Right-of-Way = 0 sq.ftSurveyor:DemarcSurveying and Engineering7601 73rd Avenue N.Brooklyn Park, MN 55428Attn: Greg Praschphone: 763-560-3093fax: 763-560-3522e-mail: gregprasch@demarcinc.comProperty Address:5132 - 5148 Hankerson Avenue, Edina, MN 55436Property Identification Number:28117213201482811721320147Benchmark:Top nut of hydrant at Hankerson Ave. S. and 52nd Street W.Elevation = 957.62Total Area of Parcel = 29,416 sq.ftProperty is in Flood Zone "X" (an Area of minimal flood hazard) per FEMA FloodZone Map No. 27053C0361F, dated 11/04/2016.Title insurance commitment showing property description and anyencumbrances of record not provided, survey subject to change.MN 1MN 2MN 3MN 4MN 5MN 6Personnel basis of bearings is assumedLegendx000.0Denotes Found Iron MonumentDenotes Iron Monument SetBollardLightPower PoleSanitary ManholeStorm ManholeWater ManholeCatch BasinGas MainUnderground CommunicationsUnderground ElectricSanitary SewerStorm SewerWatermainOverhead WiresDenotes Existing ContoursLOT 1Proposed Drainage & Utility Easements are shown thus:BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOININGRIGHT OF WAY LINES AND 5 FEET IN WIDTHAND ADJOINING INTERIOR LOT LINES,UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN.10 10 55R/W LineLot Line Existing hardcover for Parcel:MN 7The land surveyed covers the entire parcel and there are no gaps oroverlaps with adjacent parcels.MN 8LOT 2LOT 3LOT 4LOT 5LOT 6LOT 7LOT 8Exisiting HardcoverLot Area29,416 sq ftBuilding-51322,215 sq ft4-unit Building2,154 sq ftBalconies439 sq ftGarage924 sq ftTotal5,732 sq ftPercentage19.49%Developer:Donnay Homes9655 63rd Avenue NorthMaple Grove, MN 55369Attn: Steve Benke612.290.5570Property Owner:Peter & Elizabeth Macdonagh5132 Hankerson AvenueEdina, MN 55436SHEET INDEX Sheet 1 - Existing Conditions Survey Sheet 2 - Site Plan Sheet 3 - Preliminary Plat Sheet 4 - R-1 Lots within 500 feet of Subject Property Sheet 5 - Grading & Stormwater Erosion Control Plan Sheet 6 - Utility Plan Sheet 7 - Tree Protection PlanSCALE IN FEET20040REVISED 4-30-20 City Comments SCALE: 1" = 200'OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET INFORMATIONDESCRIPTIONADDRESSOWNERPID No.AREA Sq.FtWIDTHDEPTH1/9, Brookside Heights5100 Hankerson AvenueSchwein28-117-21-32-0140661550.8129.752/9, Brookside Heights5104 Hankerson AvenueSill28-117-21-32-0141650350129.863/9, Brookside Heights5108 Hankerson AvenueWestphal28-117-21-32-0142650750129.974 N 12 5/9, Brookside Heights5112 Hankerson AvenueHagen28-117-21-32-0143976975130.086 S 12 5/9, Brookside Heights5120 Hankerson AvenueMahler28-117-21-32-0144977875130.307 N 12 8/9, Brookside Heights5124 Hankerson AvenueBornfleth28-117-21-32-0172978875130.419 S 12 8/9, Brookside Heights5132 Hankerson AvenueMacdonagh28-117-21-32-0147979775130.6310, 11, 12/9, Brookside Heights5148 Hankerson AvenueMacdonagh28-117-21-32-014819623150130.9524/9, Brookside Heights5101 William AvenueMcGovern28-117-21-32-0159664051.2129.7523/9, Brookside Heights5105 William AvenueOustad28-117-21-32-0158650150129.8622/9, Brookside Heights5109 William AvenueAnderson28-117-21-32-0157650550129.9721/9, Brookside Heights5113 William AvenueLionetti28-117-21-32-0156651050130.0820/9, Brookside Heights5117 William AvenueOlson28-117-21-32-0155651450133.1919/9, Brookside Heights5121 William AvenueMayer28-117-21-32-0154651850130.3018/9, Brookside Heights5125 William AvenueCroxdale28-117-21-32-0153652250130.4117/9, Brookside Heights5129 William AvenueHoffman28-117-21-32-0152652750130.5216/9, Brookside Heights5133 William AvenueReaves28-117-21-32-0151653150130.6315/9, Brookside Heights5137 William AvenueGress28-117-21-32-0150653550130.742/8, Brookside Heights5104 William AvenueAnderson28-117-21-32-0119649950129.863/8, Brookside Heights5108 William AvenueErickson28-117-21-32-0120650350129.974/8, Brookside Heights5112 William AvenueSmith28-117-21-32-0121650750130.085 N 12 6/8, Brookside Heights5116 William AvenueErickson28-117-21-32-0122976975130.197 S 12 6/8, Brookside Heights5124 William AvenueAlbay28-117-21-32-0123977875130.418/8, Brookside Heights5128 William AvenueWeldon28-117-21-32-0124652450130.529/8, Brookside Heights5132 William AvenueBlakeman28-117-21-32-0125652850130.6310/8, Brookside Heights5136 William AvenueWeerasinghe28-117-21-32-0126653350130.7411/8, Brookside Heights5140 William AvenueField28-117-21-32-0127653750130.8512/8, Brookside Heights5144 William AvenueScheve28-117-21-32-0128654150130.9521/8, Brookside Heights5113 Bedford AvenueVan Bemmel28-117-21-32-0137650550130.0820/8, Brookside Heights5117 Bedford AvenueWoodcock28-117-21-32-0136651050130.1919/8, Brookside Heights5121 Bedford AvenueHorgen28-117-21-32-0135651450130.3018/8, Brookside Heights5125 Bedford AvenueVokoun28-117-21-32-0134651850130.4117/8, Brookside Heights5129 Bedford AvenueArneberg28-117-21-32-0133652250130.5216/8, Brookside Heights5133 Bedford AvenueZoraqi28-117-21-32-0132652750130.6315/8, Brookside Heights5137 Bedford AvenueRobichon28-117-21-32-0131653150130.7414/8, Brookside Heights5141 Bedford AvenueJacobson28-117-21-32-0130653550130.8513/8, Brookside Heights5145 Bedford AvenueTretten28-117-21-32-0129653950130.95 Legal DescriptionR-1 Lots within 500 feet of Subject PropertyMiscellaneous NotesPersonnel 7601 73rd Avenue NorthMinneapolis, Minnesota 55428(763) 560-3093DemarcInc.comThe South Half of Lot 8 and all of Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12, Block 9, BROOKSIDE HEIGHTSHennepin County, MinnesotaDeveloper:Donnay Homes9655 63rd Avenue NorthMaple Grove, MN 55369Attn: Steve Benke612.290.5570Property Owner:Peter & Elizabeth Macdonagh5132 Hankerson AvenueEdina, MN 55436Surveyor:DemarcSurveying and Engineering7601 73rd Avenue N.Brooklyn Park, MN 55428Attn: Greg Praschphone: 763-560-3093fax: 763-560-3522e-mail: gregprasch@demarcinc.comProperty Address:5132 - 5148 Hankerson Avenue, Edina, MN 55436Property Identification Number:28117213201482811721320147Lot areas shown from Hennepin County Tax Records.Total Area of Parcel = 29,416 sq.ftMN 1MN 2MN 3MN 4SHEET INDEX Sheet 1 - Existing Conditions Survey Sheet 2 - Site Plan Sheet 3 - Preliminary Plat Sheet 4 - R-1 Lots within 500 feet of Subject Property Sheet 5 - Grading & Stormwater Erosion Control Plan Sheet 6 - Utility Plan Sheet 7 - Tree Protection PlanF:\survey\brookside heights - henn\8-12-9 brookside height\01 Surveying - 88603\01 CAD\01 Source\01 Survey Base.dwgFile No.F.B. No. 1109-46 inv. 88603ADONNAY HOMES9655 63RD AVENUE NORTHMAPLE GROVE, MN 55369HANKERSON TOWNHOMESPRELIMINARY PLAT - HANKERSON TOWNHOMESdrawn by:J. Dyer 12'0"2'0"8'0"34'6"12'0"7'6"12'0"30'0"20'0"74'0"Proposed BuildingAtriumPorch 12'0"2'0"8'0"34'6"12'0"7'6"12'0"30'0"20'0"74'0"Proposed BuildingAtriumPorch 12'0"2'0"8'0"34'6"12'0"7'6"12'0"30'0"20'0"74'0"Proposed BuildingAtriumPorch 12'0"2'0"8'0"34'6"12'0"7'6"12'0"30'0"20'0"74'0"Proposed BuildingAtriumPorch 12'0"2'0"8'0"34'6"12'0"7'6"12'0"30'0"20'0"74'0"Proposed BuildingAtriumPorch 12'0"2'0"8'0"34'6"12'0"7'6"12'0"30'0"20'0"74'0"Proposed BuildingAtriumPorch 12'0"2'0"8'0"34'6"12'0"7'6"12'0"30'0"20'0"74'0"Proposed BuildingAtriumPorch 12'0"2'0"8'0"34'6"12'0"7'6"12'0"30'0"20'0"74'0"Proposed BuildingAtriumPorch 961.0964.8967.2966.4967.6967.9968.7tcc962.54tcc954.66tcc954.27tcc960.60INV=950.81INV=950.62INV=950.48INV=950.45INV=951.41INV=946.56INV=946.55SSanitary Manholerim=954.32SSanitary Manholerim=954.07INV=945.84SSanitary Manholerim=960.03tcc961.37tcc960.49tcc960.01tcc958.58tcc957.24tcc955.84tcc954.45tcc954.18tcc954.14tcc954.30Gate Valvetcc956.22tcc958.08tcc961.31959.9958.1957.2957.9956.5956.3957.2957.6958.5958.2SignSignLightPolePowerPoletwin" 18961.617" pine960.3959.7958.4961.5962.1962.1962.0962.0961.2960.1962.6Gate Valve960.4GuyAnchorTtped960.7960.4PowerPolePowerPole958.6962.5961.0963.4968.1968.3964.6964.6966.2964.012" ash963.7967.1967.3FFE969.0967.5965.9966.7967.9967.9EElec.Meter968.0GF968.6tnh957.62Timber WallFence on line+-WallB i t u m i n o u s B i t u m i n o u sOverhead Wires Overhead WiresOverhead WiresOverhead Wires35.030.3 1-STORYRESIDENCENo. 5124GARAGE HANKERSON AVENUE52ND STREET W.A L L E YConcrete CurbConcrete CurbSanitary Sewer12" Storm14.0960956958962 960 958 962 962 964966962964966968 9 6 09549 5 6 958962960958 962 964 960 96296496696296496696896896496635.212.512.521.3968.5968.5968.5968.5966.4965.7965.0964.3960.5 960.5 961.9 961.9 963.6 963.6 963.6 963.6 Catch BasinCatch Basins962.0Main Floor969.8Main Floor969.8Main Floor969.8Main Floor969.8Main Floor967.8Main Floor967.8Main Floor966.4Main Floor966.4967.6966.8966.6966.3965.75964.9964.0963.121.932.532.6 35.0966.3TW 966.0SCALE IN FEET20040F:\survey\brookside heights - henn\8-12-9 brookside height\01 Surveying - 88603\01 CAD\01 Source\01 Survey Base.dwg 5 OF 7DATE:LIC. NO.:SHEET NO.PROJECT: 88603BREVISIONSDESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:HANKERSON TOWNHOMES5132-5148 HANKERSON AVENUEEDINA, MINNESOTAGRADING & STORMWATEREROSION CONTROL PLANI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATEOF MINNESOTA.DONNAY HOMES9655 63RD AVENUE NORTHMAPLEGROVE, MINNESOTA 55369763.531.0714JEFFREY A. PRASCH, P.E.01.27.2052706JRDJAPGRP04.30.20CITY COMMENTS7601 73RD AVENUE N, BROOKLYN PARK, MN 55428PHONE: 763.560.3093 FAX: 763.560.3522www.DemarcInc.comSILT FENCE (TYP.)INLET PROTECTIONNOT TO SCALE45MINIMUM DOUBLE STITCHEDSEAMS ALL AROUND SIDEPIECES AND ON FLAP POCKETSFRONT, BACK, ANDBOTTOM TO BEMADE FROM SINGLEPIECE OF FABRICOVERFLOW HOLES (2 IN X 4IN HOLE SHALL BE HEAT CUTINTO ALL FOUR SIDE PANELS)USE REBAR OR STEEL RODFOR REMOVAL (FOR INLETSWITH CAST CURB BOXREPLACE ROD WITH WOOD 2IN X 4 IN). EXTEND 10 INBEYOND GRATE WIDTH ONBOTH SIDES, LENGTHVARIES. SECURE TO GRATEWITH WIRE OR PLASTIC TIES.LW12 W12 IN8 ININLET SPECIFICATIONS AS PERTHE PLAN DIMENSION LENGTH ANDWIDTH TO MATCH FLAP POCKET12 LROCK STABILIZING EXITNOT TO SCALE25PUBLIC ROADSURFACE FLOWCRUSHED ROCKPER SPECIFICATIONEXISTING GROUND6 IN MINIMUM GEOTEXTILEFABRICTAPER EDGESAT 1:11 IN - 2 IN CRUSHED ROCKRADIUS ASREQUIRED20' MINIMUM LENGTH EXIT WIDTH ASREQUIREDFLOW45°STRAW SEDIMENTCONTROL LOG1 IN X 2 IN X 24 IN LONG WOODEN STAKES.STAKES SHALL BE DRIVEN THROUGH THEBACK HALF OF THE SEDIMENT CONTROL LOGAT AN ANGLE OF 45 DEGREES WITH THETOP OF THE STAKE POINTING UPSTREAM.BACKFILL AND COMPACT SOILFROM TRENCH ON UPGRADIENTSIDE OF SEDIMENT CONTROL LOGPLACE SEDIMENT CONTROLLOG IN SHALLOW TRENCH(1 IN - 2 IN DEPTH)8 IN - 10 IN EMBEDMENT DEPTHSPACE BETWEEN STAKES SHALL BE A MAXIMUM OF 1 FT FOR DITCH CHECKSOR 2 FT FOR OTHER APPLICATIONS.BIOROLLSNOT TO SCALE35EXISTING GROUND5 FT MINIMUM LENGTH POSTAT 6 FT MAXIMUM SPACINGPLASTIC ZIP TIES (50 LBSTENSILE) LOCATED IN TOP 8 INGEOTEXTILE FABRIC,36 IN WIDETIRE COMPACTION ZONEMACHINE SLICE8 IN - 12 IN DEPTHFLOWFLOWSILT FENCE (MACHINE SLICED)NOT TO SCALE152 FT MINIMUM POST EMBEDMENTEXISTING GROUNDGENERAL GRADING NOTES:1.THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CITY OF EDINA SHALL APPLYEXCEPT WHERE MODIFIED BY THESE DOCUMENTS.2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" 48 HOURSPRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. (1-800-252-1166)3.THE GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL LOCATIONS ANDELEVATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITH UTILITY COMPANIES PRIORTO ANY CONSTRUCTION, AND IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANYCONFLICTS.4.THE GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE ON THESITE AT ALL TIMES.5.EXISTING TOPSOIL SHALL BE SALVAGED TO PROVIDE 4" TOPSOIL COVERAGEOVER ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE REVEGETATED.6.ANY SEDIMENT REMAINING IN PLACE AFTER THE SILT FENCE HAS BEENREMOVED SHALL BE DRESSED TO CONFORM WITH THE EXISTING GRADE,PREPARED AND SEEDED OR SODDED AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY ENGINEER.7.NO FINISHED SLOPE SHALL EXCEED 4H : 1V UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.EROSION CONTROL NOTES:1.DONNAY HOMES IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CLEANLINESS OF THE SITE ANDTHE MAINTENANCE OF THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS AND CAN BEREACHED AT 763.531.0714.2.THE STREET WILL BE SWEPT CLEAN BEFORE THE END OF EACH DAY OFACTIVE CONSTRUCTION, WHEN SEDIMENT IS TRACKED INTO THE STREET.3.AREAS WITH SLOPES GREATER THAN 3 TO 1 AND AREAS NEXT TOWETLANDS/WATERBODIES GRADED OR EXPOSED DURING CONSTRUCTIONSHALL BE PROTECTED WITH TEMPORARY VEGETATION, MULCHING OR OTHERMEANS AS SOON AS PRACTICAL.4.ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS WILL BE STABILIZED AS SOON AS PRACTICAL.UNWORKED SOILS THAT REMAIN EXPOSED AND NOT IN USE FOR LONGERTHAN 14 DAYS WILL BE COVERED WITH TEMPORARY SEED (GRASS, OATS, ORWHEAT).5.NO CONCRETE WASHOUT SHALL OCCUR ON SITE UNLESS IT IS DONE WITH ANAPPROVED MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY (MPCA) DEVICE ORSTANDARD.6.STOCKPILES SHALL BE SURROUNDED WITH ADEQUATE PERIMETER CONTROLTO PREVENT SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION.7.INSTALL INLET PROTECTION FOR ALL STORM SEWER INLETS DOWNSTREAMOF THE SITE WITHIN ONE BLOCK OR AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY.8.SITE SHALL BE KEPT CLEAN AT ALL TIMES AND REFUSE PROPERTYCONTROLLED.9.TEMPORARY PUMPING SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED WITHOUT THE USE OF ANAPPROVED MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY (MPCA) DEVICE ORSTANDARD.10.SOIL COMPACTION SHALL BE MINIMIZED; AREAS OF COMPACTED SOIL WILL BEREMOVED OR LOOSENED VIA TILLING TO A DEPTH OF NO LESS THAN6-INCHES.11.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT ON A WEEKLY BASIS AND AFTER ANYRAINFALL GREATER THAN 1" ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AND MAKE ANYREPAIRS IMMEDIATELY. AN INSPECTION LOG SHALL BE KEPT ON SITEDETAILING THESE INSPECTIONS AND REPAIRS PERFORMED.ROCK STABILIZING EXITINLET PROTECTIONFRENCH DRAIN SOUTHPER DETAIL 2/6(13'X80')100-YEAR=957.10FRENCH DRAIN NORTHPER DETAIL 1/6(13'X65')100-YEAR=958.1805.04.20OWNER COMMENTS 12'0"2'0"8'0"34'6"12'0"7'6"12'0"30'0"20'0"74'0"Proposed BuildingAtriumPorch 12'0"2'0"8'0"34'6"12'0"7'6"12'0"30'0"20'0"74'0"Proposed BuildingAtriumPorch 12'0"2'0"8'0"34'6"12'0"7'6"12'0"30'0"20'0"74'0"Proposed BuildingAtriumPorch 12'0"2'0"8'0"34'6"12'0"7'6"12'0"30'0"20'0"74'0"Proposed BuildingAtriumPorch 12'0"2'0"8'0"34'6"12'0"7'6"12'0"30'0"20'0"74'0"Proposed BuildingAtriumPorch 12'0"2'0"8'0"34'6"12'0"7'6"12'0"30'0"20'0"74'0"Proposed BuildingAtriumPorch 12'0"2'0"8'0"34'6"12'0"7'6"12'0"30'0"20'0"74'0"Proposed BuildingAtriumPorch 12'0"2'0"8'0"34'6"12'0"7'6"12'0"30'0"20'0"74'0"Proposed BuildingAtriumPorch INV=950.81INV=950.62INV=950.48INV=950.45INV=951.41INV=946.56INV=946.55SSanitary Manholerim=954.32SSanitary Manholerim=954.07INV=945.84SSanitary Manholerim=960.03Gate ValveSignSignLightPolePowerPoletwin" 18961.617" pine960.3Gate ValveGuyAnchorTtpedPowerPolePowerPole12" ash963.7EElec.Metertnh957.62150.50Timber WallFence on line+-WallB i t u m i n o u s B i t u m i n o u sOverhead Wires Overhead WiresOverhead WiresOverhead Wires35.030.3 1-STORYRESIDENCENo. 5124GARAGE HANKERSON AVENUE52ND STREET W.A L L E YConcrete CurbConcrete CurbSanitary Sewer12" Storm14.014520101035.212.512.521.310 20Catch BasinCatch BasinsMain Floor969.8Main Floor969.8Main Floor969.8Main Floor969.8Main Floor967.8Main Floor967.8Main Floor966.4Main Floor966.421.932.532.6 35.0SCALE IN FEET20040F:\survey\brookside heights - henn\8-12-9 brookside height\01 Surveying - 88603\01 CAD\01 Source\01 Survey Base.dwg 6 OF 7DATE:LIC. NO.:SHEET NO.PROJECT: 88603BREVISIONSDESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:HANKERSON TOWNHOMES5132-5148 HANKERSON AVENUEEDINA, MINNESOTAUTILITY PLANI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATEOF MINNESOTA.DONNAY HOMES9655 63RD AVENUE NORTHMAPLEGROVE, MINNESOTA 55369763.531.0714JEFFREY A. PRASCH, P.E.01.27.2052706JRDJAPGRP04.30.20CITY COMMENTS7601 73RD AVENUE N, BROOKLYN PARK, MN 55428PHONE: 763.560.3093 FAX: 763.560.3522www.DemarcInc.comCBRIM=953.64INV(SE)=951.41 (FIELD VERIFY)INV(NW)=952.5045 LF 6" HDPE @ 5.56%50 LF 6" HDPEDRAINTILE @ 0.40%40 LF 6" HDPEDRAINTILE @ 0.50%40 LF 6" HDPE @ 5.00%CONNECT 4" PVC SANITARY SERVICETO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER (TYP.)CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN (TYP.)CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN (TYP.)LANDSCAPE GRATERIM=966.80INV=956.00INV=955.00LANDSCAPE GRATERIM=958.50INV=955.00LANDSCAPE GRATERIM=961.30INV=957.00INV=957.20INV=955.00 (TYP.)LANDSCAPE GRATERIM=965.40INV=956.00LANDSCAPE GRATERIM=968.80INV=958.00INV=953.00 (TYP.)INV=955.20FRENCH DRAIN SOUTH NOT TO SCALE26NOTE:CONSTRUCT BOTTOM OF FRENCH DRAINSYSTEM ON A LEVEL PLANE.FINAL GRADE (VARIES)13.0'6" HDPE DRAINTILE OUTLETINV=955.00PLACED ON APPROVED /UNCOMPACTED SUBGRADECLEAN SAND953.006" HDPE DRAINTILE INTLET955.50FRENCH DRAIN NORTH NOT TO SCALE16NOTE:CONSTRUCT BOTTOM OF FRENCH DRAINSYSTEM ON A LEVEL PLANE.FINAL GRADE (VARIES)13.0'6" HDPE DRAINTILE OUTLETINV=957.00PLACED ON APPROVED /UNCOMPACTED SUBGRADECLEAN SAND955.006" HDPE DRAINTILE INTLET957.50NOTES:1.ALL SANITARY SERVICES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 2.5% SLOPE.2.ALL SERVICES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PER CITY DETAIL 300.1" COPPER WATER SERVICE ANDCURB STOP FOR EACH UNIT (TYP.)60 LF 6" PVC SCH 40 @ 5.00% (TYP.)60 LF 6" PVC SCH 40 @ 5.00% (TYP.)1" COPPER WATER SERVICE ANDCURB STOP FOR EACH UNIT (TYP.)4" SANITARY SERVICE ANDCLEANOUT FOR EACH UNIT (TYP.)CONNECT 4" PVC SANITARY SERVICETO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER (TYP.)4" SANITARY SERVICE ANDCLEANOUT FOR EACH UNIT (TYP.)05.04.20OWNER COMMENTS PorchPorchPorchPorchPorchPorchPorchPorch961.0964.8967.2966.4967.6967.9968.7tcc962.54tcc954.66tcc954.27tcc960.60INV=950.81INV=950.62INV=950.48INV=950.45INV=951.41INV=946.56INV=946.55SSanitary Manholerim=954.32SSanitary Manholerim=954.07INV=945.84SSanitary Manholerim=960.03tcc961.37tcc960.49tcc960.01tcc958.58tcc957.24tcc955.84tcc954.45tcc954.18tcc954.14tcc954.30Gate Valvetcc956.22tcc958.08tcc961.31959.9958.1957.2957.9956.5956.3957.2957.6958.5958.2SignSignLightPolePowerPoletwin" 18961.617" pine960.322" three961.6959.7958.4961.5962.1962.1962.0962.0961.2960.15" oak961.78" oak961.9962.636" elm963.6Gate Valve960.4GuyAnchorTtped960.7960.4PowerPolePowerPole958.6962.5961.030" maple964.3963.4968.17" spruce967.7968.3964.6964.6966.2964.012" ash963.7967.1967.3FFE969.0967.5965.9966.7967.9967.9EElec.Meter968.0GF968.6tnh957.62150.50Timber WallFence on line+-WallB i t u m i n o u s B i t u m i n o u sOverhead Wires Overhead WiresOverhead WiresOverhead Wires35.030.3 1-STORYRESIDENCENo. 5124GARAGE HANKERSON AVENUE52ND STREET W.A L L E YConcrete CurbConcrete CurbSanitary Sewer12" StormN 00°07'17" W 225.00 N 89°49'57" E 130.46N 89°47'06" E 130.95N 00°00'12" E 225.11 14.014960956958962 960 958 962 962 964966962964966968 9 6 09549 5 6 958962520101096095896296496096296496696296496696896896496635.212.512.521.3N 89°49'57" E 130.84N 89°49'57" E 130.79N 89°49'57" E 130.75N 89°49'57" E 130.62N 89°49'57" E 130.57N 89°49'57" E 130.5332.5020.00 32.5020.0020.0020.0030.0030.0030.0030.0020.0020.0020.0020.0052.6152.501020 Catch BasinCatch Basins962.0967.6966.8966.6966.3965.75964.9964.0963.121.932.532.6 35.0N 89°49'57" E 130.68F:\survey\brookside heights - henn\8-12-9 brookside height\01 Surveying - 88603\01 CAD\01 Source\01 Survey Base.dwgFile No.Certification Legal Description Signed: ____________________________________________ Gregory R. Prasch Registration No. 24992The only easements shown are from plats of record or information provided by client.I certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly Licensed land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota.TREE PROTECTION PLANTREE PRESERVATION PLAN7601 73rd Avenue NorthMinneapolis, Minnesota 55428(763) 560-3093DemarcInc.comTREE PROTECTION - HANKERSON TOWNHOMESMiscellaneous NotesPersonnel basis of bearings is assumedLegendx000.0Denotes Found Iron MonumentDenotes Iron Monument SetBollardLightPower PoleSanitary ManholeStorm ManholeWater ManholeCatch BasinGas MainUnderground CommunicationsUnderground ElectricSanitary SewerStorm SewerWatermainOverhead WiresSilt FenceTree Protection FenceDenotes Existing Contours123SpeciesTree SizeTree HealthRemove/ProtectAsh12"GoodProtectMaple30"GoodRemoveSpruce7"GoodRemoveElm36"GoodRemoveOak8"GoodRemoveOak5"GoodRemoveDeciduous22" TriGoodRemoveConiferous18" TwinGoodProtectPine17"GoodProtectF.B. No. 1109-46 inv. 88603ADONNAY HOMES9655 63RD AVENUE NORTHMAPLE GROVE, MN 55369The South Half of Lot 8 and all of Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12, Block 9, BROOKSIDE HEIGHTSHennepin County, MinnesotaPrepared this 24th day of January 2020.drawn by:J. DyerSurveyor:DemarcSurveying and Engineering7601 73rd Avenue N.Brooklyn Park, MN 55428Attn: Greg Praschphone: 763-560-3093fax: 763-560-3522e-mail: gregprasch@demarcinc.comProperty Address:5132 - 5148 Hankerson Avenue, Edina, MN 55436Property Identification Number:28117213201482811721320147Benchmark:Top nut of hydrant at Hankerson Ave. S. and 52nd Street W.Elevation = 957.62Total Area of Parcel = 29,416 sq.ftProperty is in Flood Zone "X" (an Area of minimal flood hazard) per FEMA FloodZone Map No. 27053C0361F, dated 11/04/2016.Title insurance commitment showing property description and anyencumbrances of record not provided, survey subject to change.MN 1MN 2MN 3MN 4MN 5MN 6456789123456789Developer:Donnay Homes9655 63rd Avenue NorthMaple Grove, MN 55369Attn: Steve Benke612.290.5570Property Owner:Peter & Elizabeth Macdonagh5132 Hankerson AvenueEdina, MN 55436HANKERSON TOWNHOMESSHEET INDEX Sheet 1 - Existing Conditions Survey Sheet 2 - Site Plan Sheet 3 - Preliminary Plat Sheet 4 - R-1 Lots within 500 feet of Subject Property Sheet 5 - Grading & Stormwater Erosion Control Plan Sheet 6 - Utility Plan Sheet 7 - Tree Protection PlanSCALE IN FEET20040LOT 1LOT 2LOT 3LOT 4LOT 5LOT 6LOT 7LOT 8REVISED 4-30-20 City CommentsREVISED 5-04-20 Owner Comments PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com Donnay Homes and the Kestrel Design Group, Inc. Date: May 4, 2020 Re: Hankerson Avenue Redevelopment 5132 and 5148 Hankerson Ave. PID 28-117-21-32-0147, PID 28-117-21-32-0148 Background: Project has been reviewed at Planning Commission on March 11, 2020,and at City Council on April 7, 2020. Project received mixed reviews leading to the revisions contained in this submittal. Applicants agreed to extending the 60/120 day rule to allow the project to be revised to address Planning Commission and City Council concerns. Proposal: Project is revised to a total of 8 units on the subject properties in 2 – 4 unit Buildings. Compared to the original proposal, significant additional greenspace (~7%) results, as well as the protection of at least two significant trees on the lot. Revisions to the Original Submittal: Project unit count is reduced to 8. (This is a reduction from the original 13 shown at Sketch Plan stage.) o Project Density is now 11.85u/a, allowing the Rezoning and Comprehensive Plan requests to meet the Current Use of Medium Density. o Building Hardcover is now 39.98%. o Setbacks from Hankerson and the Alley remain the same, Setback from 52nd Street is now 32’6” and from the North Property Line is 12’6”. o Setback from 52nd Street now greatly exceeds the adjacent building on Williams Ave. o Building to building distance to 5124 Hankerson remains at ~40’ Building is divided into 2 – 4-unit Buildings. o Developing the project as 2 buildings will allow for a better relationship meeting the various existing grades around the site, Alley and Hankerson. o Building to Building distance is 20’, allowing for a less monolithic feel to the project. Significant vistas through the structures will result. Building Elevations have been revised into a more ‘current’ style. o Siding (remains) a composite, pre- finished material with a 25yr (min) finish warranty. o ‘Stone’ accents are now s composite stone product. o Material Board will be provided at PC and Council o Exterior finishes are now the same as what was used on our 49th and France project. See image at Right. Unit Pricing is revised to starting in the $700’s. Building information o Units continue to have a 2-car garage o Units continue to be 2-stories, with an unfinished basement o Basement finishes are available o Units will have up to 4 bedrooms and 4 baths Conclusion: Donnay Home and Kestrel Design believe the addition of this project to the neighborhood will meet the stated goals of the Grandview Small Area Plan by turning barriers into opportunities, providing a buffer to the neighborhood, enhancing property values in the neighborhood, improving the Vernon streetscape, offering a type of housing in short supply, and compliment walkability in the neighborhood. Date: June 16, 2020 Agenda Item #: VIII.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2020-66 Subdivision with Variances at 5928 Abbott Avenue South for Second Story Build Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to close the public hearing at noon, July 15, and to continue action on the item to the July 21 City Council meeting. INTRODUCTION: Second Story Build is requesting a Subdivision with Variances at 5928 Abbott Avenue. The existing home on the lot would be torn down, and two new homes built on the new parcels. Both lots would gain access off Abbott Avenue. This lot was originally platted as two lots. The applicants are proposing to restore the original plat. To accommodate the request the following is required: 1. A subdivision; 2. Lot width variances from 75 feet to 49.8 feet for both lots; 3. Lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 6,391 and 6,331 square feet; and 4. Lot depth from 135 feet to 127 feet for both lots. Better Together Public Hearing Comments ATTACHMENTS: Description Planning Commission Staff Report, June 10, 2020 Resolution No. 2020-66: Approving Preliminary and Final Plat with Variance Engineering Memo Revised Grading and Drainage Plan Proposed Plans Applicant Narrative Site Location & Street View Recent Subdivisions June 10, 2020 Planning Commission Cary Teague, Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING: Preliminary Plat with Variances for 5928 Abbott Avenue Information / Background: Second Story Build is requesting a Subdivision with Variances at 5928 Abbott Avenue. The existing home on the lot would be torn down, and two new homes built on the new parcels. Both lots would gain access off Abbott Avenue. This lot was originally platted as two lots. The applicants are proposing to restore the original plat. (See applicant narrative and plans attached.) To accommodate the request the following is required: 1. A subdivision; 2. Lot width variances from 75 feet to 49.8 feet for both lots; 3. Lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 6,391 and 6,331 square feet; and 4. Lot depth from 135 feet to 127 feet for both lots. Within this neighborhood, the median lot area is 6,745 square feet, median lot depth is 129.9 feet, and the median lot width is 50 feet. (See attached median calculations.) Surrounding Land Uses The lots on all sides of the subject properties are zoned and guided low-density residential. Existing Site Features The existing site contains a single-family home. STAFF REPORT Page 2 Planning Guide Plan designation: Single-dwelling residential Zoning: R-1, Single-dwelling district Lot Dimensions Area Lot Width Depth REQUIRED 9,000 s.f. 75 feet 135 feet Lot 1 6,391 s.f.* 49.8 feet* 127 feet* Lot 7 6,331 s.f.* 49.8 feet* 127 feet* * Variance Required Grading/Drainage and Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them acceptable, subject to conditions. (See the attached memo from the city engineer.) The applicant has revised the original grading and drainage plans to address the issues raised by engineering. Drainage would flow to the street in the front yard and to the rear toward rainwater garden/infiltration basins that would be constructed in the rear yard of each lot adjacent to the alley. (See attached revised grading and drainage plan.) The existing site does not have proper drainage—relatively flat with large depressions. A final grade as-built survey and inspection will be required to verify compliance with the approved stormwater plan. Any disturbance to the roadway caused by the construction of the new homes must be repaired. The detailed grading plans would be reviewed by the city engineer at the time of a building permit application. A construction management plan will be required for the construction of the new home. Specific hook-up locations would be reviewed at the time of a building permit for each lot. A Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit would also be required. Tree Removal Per the City’s tree ordinance, trees may be removed within a 10-foot radius of building pads and a 5-foot radius of driveways. Any tree removed outside of those areas would need to be replaced. A more detailed review would occur at the time of building permit review for each lot. STAFF REPORT Page 3 History of Subdivision Requests with Variances The City of Edina has considered several subdivision requests with variances in this general area. (See attached area map.) The following is the history in the past 15 years: History of Recent Subdivisions with Variances 1. In 2006, the property at 5901 France Avenue received variances to build four (4) 66-foot wide lots consistent with the area. (Median = 9,269 s.f. & 73 feet wide.) 2. In 2008, 6120 Brookview Avenue was proposed to be divided into two (2) 50-foot lots; however, the applicant withdrew the request before action was taken. (Median = 6,700 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 3. In 2009, a 100-foot lot at 5920 Oaklawn was granted variances to divide into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,699 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 4. In 2011, the property at 5829 Brookview was granted variances to divide into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,769 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 5. In 2012, the property at 6109 Oaklawn was denied the request to subdivide the property into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,701 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 6. In 2012, 6120 Brookview was again proposed for subdivision. That request was denied. (Median = 6,700 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 7. In 2012, 5945 Concord was denied the request to subdivide the property into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 10,028 s.f. & 77 feet wide.) 8. In 2015, a 100-foot lot at 5825 Ashcroft Avenue was granted variances to divide into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,790 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 9 In 2015, 5945 Concord was approved for a request to subdivide the property into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 10,028 s.f. & 77 feet wide.) 10. In 2016, 5845 Kellogg Avenue was denied a request to subdivide the property into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,715 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 11. In 2017, 6124 Ewing Avenue was approved for a request to subdivide into two (2) lots with lot width and area variances. (Median = 11,500 s.f. & 80 feet wide.) 12. In 2017, 5404 Park Place was approved for a request to subdivide into two (2) lots with lot width variances from 75 feet to 65 feet for each lot; and lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 8,705 and 8,840 square feet. (Median = 8,107 s.f. & width was 60 feet wide.) STAFF REPORT Page 4 13. In 2019, 5841 Oaklawn was approved for a request to subdivide into two (2) lots with lot width variances from 75 feet to 50 feet for one lot; and lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 8,793 and 6,694 square feet. 14. In 2019, 4625 Lexington was approved for a request to subdivide into two (2) lots with lot width variances from 75 feet to 60 feet for both lots, and lot area variances from 9,306 square feet to 8,106 and 8,128 square feet. (Median area - 9,306 square feet, median lot depth - 135 feet, and the median lot width 68 feet) 15. In 2020, 5928 Ashcroft was denied a request to subdivide into two (2) lots with lot width variances from 75 feet to 50 feet for both lots, and lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 6,813 and 6,790 square feet. (Median area – 8,841 s.f., median lot depth – 135 and median width was 66 feet.) In the instances when subdivisions have been denied, the area immediately surrounding the site contained a wide variety of lot sizes. In instances when subdivisions have been approved, the requesting lot was oversized (usually twice as large) compared to lots in the immediate area. This is the largest lot on this block as it is 100 feet wide. All homes facing Abbott are 50 feet in width. There are two 75 feet wide lots across the alley to the west. Primary Issue Are the findings for a variance met? • Are the findings for a variance met? Yes. Staff believes that the findings for a Variance are met for this subdivision. Per state law and the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal meets the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: a) Will the proposal relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with the ordinance requirements? Yes. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. “Practical difficulties” may include functional and aesthetic concerns. The practical difficulties include the location of the alley along the south and west lot lines that slightly reduced the size of the lots compared to most of this neighborhood, where there are no alleys. Also, the previous property owners did not develop on the lot that is proposed to be divided. The original owner purchased two lots and combined them into one lot and built a home over the two lots. The existing legal description of this property is Lots 8 and 9, Harriet STAFF REPORT Page 5 Manor Second Addition. The City does not have a copy of the original plat to show the original lots. The requested variances to split this lot are reasonable in the context of this block. The lots to the north and east are all similar in size to the requested lot division. This lot is 100 feet in width; every other lot facing Abbott Avenue on this block is 50 feet wide. The proposed subdivision would result in two lots more characteristic of this block. If the variances were denied, the applicant would be denied a subdivision of property which the lots would be the same or like existing lots in the area. The applicant is proposing to restore the lots into the form of the original plat. b) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-created? The circumstances regarding the size of the lot, and that a previous property owner built on and developed the site from two lots into one. That condition was not created by the applicant. c) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The proposed improvements requested by the variance would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Two new single-family homes would be constructed on lots similar in size to the lots to the north and east. Options for Consideration As demonstrated on pages 3-4 of this report, there are options for consideration when considering a subdivision like this one. The following outlines options for the Planning Commission and City Council to consider. Denial Recommend that the City Council deny the proposed two lot subdivision of 5928 Abbott Avenue South with lot width variances from 75 feet to 49.8 feet for both lots; lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 6,391 and 6,331 square feet; and lot depth from 135 feet to 127 feet for both lots. Denial is based on the following findings: 1. The Subject Property is a conforming single-family residential lot with a new single-family house and has a taxable market value of $320,100. Reasonable use of the property exists today. 2. There are no practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance standards. The requested variances to split this lot are not reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood. The existing lot is oversized. The lot is generally consistent with the two lots to the west that are oversized at 75 feet wide. The Subject Property is 100 feet wide. STAFF REPORT Page 6 3. The practical difficulty alleged by the applicant’s proposal to subdivide the property is self- created. 4. The need for the variance is created only by Applicant’s desire to maximize the return on its investment. Such economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Approval Recommend that the City Council approve the proposed two lot subdivision of 5928 Abbott Avenue South with lot width variances from 75 feet to 49.8 feet for both lots; lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 6,391 and 6,331 square feet; and lot depth from 135 feet to 127 feet for both lots. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. Except for the variances, the proposal meets the required standards and ordinance for a subdivision. 2. The proposal re-establishes the original plat of two lots. 3. The requested variances to split this lot are reasonable in the context of this block. The lots to the north and east are all similar in size. This lot is 100 feet in width; every other lot facing Abbott Avenue on this block is 50 feet wide. The proposed subdivision would result in two lots more characteristic of this block. 4 The practical difficulties include the location of the alley along the south and west lot lines that slightly reduced the size of the lots compared to most of this neighborhood, where there are no alleys. Also, the previous property owners did not develop on the lot that is proposed to be divided. The original owner purchased two lots and combined them into one lot and built a home over the two lots. If the variances were denied, the applicant would be denied a subdivision of property which the lots would be the same or like existing lots in the area. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The City must approve the final plat within one year of preliminary approval or receive a written application for a time extension or the preliminary approval will be void. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following items must be submitted: a. Submit evidence of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District approval. The City may require revisions to the preliminary plat to meet the district’s requirements. b. A curb-cut permit must be obtained from the Edina engineering department. c. A grading, drainage and erosion control plan subject to review and approval of the city engineer. The proposed plans shall meet all conditions outlined in the engineering memo dated June 10, 2020. STAFF REPORT Page 7 d. There shall be no increase in peak rate or volume to neighboring private property. e. Any disturbance to the roadway caused by the construction of the new homes must be repaired by replacing the asphalt pavement from curb-to-curb and from saw-cut to saw-cut. f. A construction management plan will be required for the construction of the new homes. g. Utility hook-ups are subject to review of the city engineer. h. New homes shall conform to the city’s tree ordinance. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the proposed two lot subdivision of 5928 Abbott Avenue South with lot width variances from 75 feet to 49.8 feet for both lots; lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 6,391 and 6,331 square feet; and lot depth from 135 feet to 127 feet for both lots, subject to the findings and conditions above. Deadline for a City Decision: August 5, 2020 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-66 APPROVING PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT WITH VARIANCES AT 5928 ABBOTT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Second Story Build is requesting a Subdivision with Variances at 5928 Abbott Avenue. The existing home on the lot would be torn down, and two new homes built on the new parcels. Both lots would gain access off Abbott Avenue. This lot was originally platted as two lots. The applicants are proposing to restore the original plat. 1.02 Within this neighborhood, the median lot area is 6,745 square feet, median lot depth is 129.9 feet, and the median lot width is 50 feet. 1.03 The following described tract of land is requested to be divided: Lots 8 and 9, Harriet Manor Second Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 1.04 To accommodate the request the following is required: A subdivision; Lot width variances from 75 feet to 49.8 feet for both lots; Lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 6,391 and 6,331 square feet; and Lot depth from 135 feet to 127 feet for both lots. 1.05 The Subject Property is guided Single Family Residential under the City’s Comprehensive Plan and is zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District. 1.06 On June 10, 2020 the Planning Commission held a public hearing. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Preliminary Plat and Variances. Vote:7 Ayes and 0 Nays. 1.07 On June 16, 2020, the City Council held a public hearing on the proposed subdivision and variances. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. Except for the variances, the proposal meets the required standards and ordinance for a subdivision. 2. The proposal re-establishes the original plat of two lots. Resolution No. 2020-66 Page 2 3. The requested variances to split this lot are reasonable in the context of this block. The lots to the north and east are all similar in size. This lot is 100 feet in width; every other lot facing Abbott Avenue on this block is 50 feet wide. The proposed subdivision would result in two lots more characteristic of this block. 4 The practical difficulties include the location of the alley along the south and west lot lines that slightly reduced the size of the lots compared to most of this neighborhood, where there are no alleys. Also, the previous property owners did not develop on the lot that is proposed to be divided. The original owner purchased two lots and combined them into one lot and built a home over the two lots. If the variances were denied, the applicant would be denied a subdivision of property which the lots would be the same or like existing lots in the area. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Preliminary & Final Plat of 5928 Abbott Avenue with lot width variances from 75 feet to 49.8 feet for both lots; lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 6,391 and 6,331 square feet; and lot depth from 135 feet to 127 feet for both lots. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. The City must approve the final plat within one year of preliminary approval or receive a written application for a time extension or the preliminary approval will be void. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following items must be submitted: a. Submit evidence of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District approval. The City may require revisions to the preliminary plat to meet the district’s requirements. b. A curb-cut permit must be obtained from the Edina engineering department. c. A grading, drainage and erosion control plan subject to review and approval of the city engineer. The proposed plans shall meet all conditions outlined in the engineering memo dated June 10, 2020. d. There shall be no increase in peak rate or volume to neighboring private property. e. Any disturbance to the roadway caused by the construction of the new homes must be repaired by replacing the asphalt pavement from curb-to-curb and from saw-cut to saw-cut. f. A construction management plan will be required for the construction of the new homes. g. Utility hook-ups are subject to review of the city engineer. Resolution No. 2020-66 Page 3 h. New homes shall conform to the city’s tree ordinance. Adopted this 21st day of July 2020. ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 21, 2020 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2020. _________________________________ City Clerk DATE: 6/10/2020 TO: Cary Teague – Planning Director FROM: Zuleyka Marquez, PE – Graduate Engineer RE: 5928 Abbott Ave S - Subdivision Review, Revision 1 The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and utility concerns, grading, stormwater, erosion and sediment control and for general adherence to the relevant ordinance sections. This review was performed at the request of the Planning Department; a more detailed review will be performed at the time of building permit application. Plans reviewed during the first review included preliminary plat, erosion & sediment control plan, grading plan, and existing conditions survey dated 4/23/2020. Plans reviewed during the second review included a stormwater management report and updated site plan dated 5/27/2020. Summary of Work The applicant proposes to subdivide the lot. Easements No comments. Grading and Drainage The existing site does not have proper drainage—relatively flat with large depressions. Grading for the subdivision proposes to direct drainage to Abbott Ave S to the east and the alley to the west and south. Fill is proposed to accomplish the proposed drainage. Generally, this area drains to a structural flooding issue. Stormwater Mitigation Two rain gardens in the backyards are proposed. The stormwater management report shows no net increase in risk to private property due to the increase in proposed impervious surface and fill. The existing onsite storage is maintained and additional storage is provided for the increase in impervious to provide volume control. A final grade as-built survey and inspection will be required to verify compliance with the approved stormwater plan. Floodplain Development The existing site has two local 1% annual chance flood shapes onsite with an elevation of 891.8’. The lowest opening elevations are required to be at no less than 893.8’. Lowest opening elevations to be confirmed during permit review. Erosion and Sediment Control An erosion and sediment control plan was reviewed and is consistent with City of Edina Building Policy SP-002. Street and Driveway Entrance The applicant proposes two new curb cuts on Abbott Ave S. Driveway entrance permits will be required. The street was reconstructed in 2019. Refer to standard plates 525 and 541 for patching requirements. Public Utilities Water and sanitary is served from Abbott Ave S. Two sanitary laterals and one water service are available. One-inch water service lines from the curb stop to the dwelling is required per the City’s policy SP-024. Sewer and water connection fees shall be paid prior to building permit issuance. Sump line available for connection. If connecting to the City sump line, a permit and compliance with City of Edina Building Policy SP-006 will be required. Miscellaneous A Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit may be required; applicant will need to verify with the district. An sealed well is located onsite. Thus, no coordination with Minnesota Department of Health will be required. Retaining walls are not proposed. 891.8 892.3 892.2 891.8 891.8892.8 893.2 893.5 GF 894.1 894.0 FFE896.1 895.9 893.6 893.2 892.3 892.4893.3 tcc892.43 tcc892.22 tcc 892.03 tcc 891.98 tcc 891.89 tcc891.84 tcc 891.84 PowerPole 892.3 Guy Anchor Sign 892.1 891.4891.2 891.3891.2 891.6 891.5 891.4 891.5 891.6 892.2 892.3 892.1 892.6 893.3 892.5 892.5 891.9 892.2 892.3 892.9892.6 892.4 892.3 892.3 892.0892.6 Manhole rim=892.44 892.2 892.1892.3 891.5 48"892.5 891.8 891.6 891.7 891.7 891.5 891.9 891.8 891.2891.8 892.1 891.9 891.6 892.0 892.1 891.4891.4 891.2 892.0 891.2 892.3 892.3 893.7 893.7893.6 893.4 892.8 Guy Anchor PowerPole 892.5 892.5 892.5 892.7 892.9 893.1 892.9 892.3 892.3 892.1 892.0 892.1 891.7 891.7892.0892.2893.6 893.8 891.9 ABBOTT AVE. S.A L L E YA L L E Y 4%+- 4%+-GF=894.1Max 1st Flr=895.1GF=894.1Max 1st Flr=895.189289 3 893 895 892 893 894 89289289289 2892 892 892893894893894890890891891892892893893890890891891892892893 893.9893.9894.1894.1893.4 894.6893.5 892.2 SITE PLAN05.27.2020MICHIELUTTI ADDITION5433 WOODCREST DRIVEEDINA, MNSCALE IN FEET 200 40 25 FT 25 FT PROPOSED BACKYARD DEPRESSION 3 FT DEPTH RAIN GARDEN OCCASIONAL WATER LEVEL AT 891.8 FT AFTER HEAVY RAINFALL Legend x000.0 Denotes Found Iron Monument Denotes Iron Monument Set Bollard Light Power Pole Sanitary Manhole Storm Manhole Water Manhole Catch Basin Gas Main Underground Communications Underground Electric Sanitary Sewer Storm Sewer Watermain Overhead Wires Denotes Existing Contours 000.0 Denotes Proposed Elevation Denotes Surface Drainage Denotes Proposed Contours PROPOSED BUILDING PAD (NOT TO EXCEED 2250 SQ.FT) PROPOSED BUILDING PAD (NOT TO EXCEED 2250 SQ.FT) 891.8892.3892.2891.8891.8892.8893.2893.5GF894.1894.0FFE896.1895.9893.6893.2892.3892.4893.3tcc892.43tcc892.22tcc892.03tcc891.98tcc891.89tcc891.84tcc891.84PowerPole892.3GuyAnchorSign892.1891.4891.2891.3891.2891.65" quad891.4891.5891.4891.5891.6892.26"891.7FFE894.1892.6GGasMeter892.3892.3892.1892.6893.3892.5892.5891.9892.2892.3892.9892.6892.4892.7892.6892.5892.3892.3892.5892.6892.5892.6892.7892.6892.9892.6892.3892.0892.6Manholerim=892.44EElec.Meter892.3891.7892.5892.3892.2892.1892.3892.4892.5891.5891.3A/C892.0891.7891.7891.5891.548"892.5891.8891.6891.7891.7891.5891.9891.8891.2891.8892.1891.9891.6892.0892.1891.4891.4891.2892.0891.2GF892.6892.3892.3893.7893.7893.6893.4892.8GuyAnchorPowerPole892.5892.5892.5892.7892.9893.1892.9892.3892.3892.1892.0892.1891.7891.7892.0892.2893.6893.8891.928.212.12.318.010.611.64.922.220.064.0 S 89°30'54" E 127.53S 89°30'54" E 122.26S 00°01'26" E 94.6599.657.10S 44°46'10" EO v e r h e a d W i r e sO v e r h e a d W i r e sO v e r h e a d W i r e sO v e r h e a d W i r e slandscape timberslandscape timbersC o n c r e t eC o n c r e t eC o n c r e t eD e c k Concrete curb B i t u m i n o u s P o r c hlandscape timbersC o n c.cant. S 00°08'06" W Meas 100.0 PlatMeas 95.0 Plat ABBOTT AVE. S. A L L E YA L L E YA L L E Y606014 146014 brick planter49.8244.8249.82 49.82S 89°30'54" E 127.39Meas. 127.94 PlatMeas. 122.93 Plat20.428.8 34.931.3 35.39" VCP Sanitary Sewer 6" CIP Watermain 892893 8938958928938948928928928928928928921-STORY FRAMENo.5928 1-STORY FRAMENo.5924P a v e r s1-STORY FRAMENo.3400 894.6893.54.3 5.3892.2F:\survey\harriet manor 2nd addition - hennepin\8-9-5\01 Surveying - 88918\01 CAD\01 Source\01 Survey Base.dwgFile No.F.B. No. 1113-49 inv. 88918CertificationPETE & LYNDA MICHIELUTTI5433 WOODCREST DRIVEEDINA, MN 55424 Legal DescriptionLots 8 and 9, Block 5, HARRIET MANOR SECOND ADDITION,Hennepin County, Minnesota Signed: ____________________________________________ Gregory R. Prasch Registration No. 24992Surveyed this 30th day of March 2020.The only easements shown are from plats of record or information provided by client.I certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly Licensed land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota.EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEYZoning Information7601 73rd Avenue NorthMinneapolis, Minnesota 55428(763) 560-3093DemarcInc.comEXISTING CONDITIONSMiscellaneous NotesSurveyor:DemarcSurveying and Engineering7601 73rd Avenue N.Brooklyn Park, MN 55428Attn: Greg Praschphone: 763-560-3093fax: 763-560-3522e-mail: gregprasch@demarcinc.comProperty Address:5928 Abbott Avenue S., Edina, MN 55410Property Identification Number: 20-028-24-31-0184Benchmark: Top nut of hydrant at Abbott Ave. S. and 60th StreetElevation = 894.71 feetTotal Area of Parcel = 12,682 sq.ftProperty is in Flood Zone "X" (an Area of minimal flood hazard) per FEMA FloodZone Map No. 27053C0364F, dated 11/04/2016.Title insurance commitment showing property description and anyencumbrances of record not provided, survey subject to change.MN 1MN 2MN 3MN 4MN 5MN 6Personnel Legendx000.0Denotes Found Iron MonumentDenotes Iron Monument SetBollardLightPower PoleSanitary ManholeStorm ManholeWater ManholeCatch BasinGas MainUnderground CommunicationsUnderground ElectricSanitary SewerStorm SewerWatermainOverhead WiresDenotes Existing ContoursExisting hardcover for Parcel:MN 7The land surveyed covers the entire parcel and there are no gaps oroverlaps with adjacent parcels.MN 8drawn by:Developer:Peter & Linda Michielutti5433 Woodcrest DriveEdina, MN 55424phone:612-819-8661Property Currently Zoned: R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District Zoning Ordinance Requirements: Building Setbacks (for living space unless otherwise specified) Front - 30 feet or average of adjacent homes Side Yard - 5 feet Rear Yard - 25 feet Maximum Building Height - 30 feet Minimum Lot Size - 9,000 sq.ft Minimum Lot Width - 75 feet Minimum Lot Depth - 120 feetRefer to City code for additional requirements or possible variations to those listed above.HardcoverLot Area12,682 sq ftBuilding1,434 sq ftPorch56 sq ftDeck allowance-150 sq ftDeck293 sq ftTotal1,633 sq ftPercentage12.88%Current Owner:Brian & Karen Hobbins5928 Woodcrest DriveEdina, MN 55424SHEET INDEX Sheet 1 - Existing Conditions Survey Sheet 2 - Preliminary Plat Sheet 3 - Tree Protection Plan Sheet 4 - R-1 Lots within 500 feet of Subject Property Sheet 5 - Grading Plan Sheet C1 - Erosion & Sediment Control Plan 891.8892.3892.2891.8891.8892.8893.2893.5GF894.1894.0FFE896.1895.9893.6893.2892.3892.4893.3tcc892.43tcc892.22tcc892.03tcc891.98tcc891.89tcc891.84tcc891.84PowerPole892.3GuyAnchorSign892.1891.4891.2891.3891.2891.65" quad891.4891.5891.4891.5891.6892.26"891.7FFE894.1892.6GGasMeter892.3892.3892.1892.6893.3892.5892.5891.9892.2892.3892.9892.6892.4892.7892.6892.5892.3892.3892.5892.6892.5892.6892.7892.6892.9892.6892.3892.0892.6Manholerim=892.44EElec.Meter892.3891.7892.5892.3892.2892.1892.3892.4892.5891.5891.3A/C892.0891.7891.7891.5891.548"892.5891.8891.6891.7891.7891.5891.9891.8891.2891.8892.1891.9891.6892.0892.1891.4891.4891.2892.0891.2GF892.6892.3892.3893.7893.7893.6893.4892.8GuyAnchorPowerPole892.5892.5892.5892.7892.9893.1892.9892.3892.3892.1892.0892.1891.7891.7892.0892.2893.6893.8891.928.212.12.318.010.611.64.922.220.064.0 S 89°30'54" E 127.53S 89°30'54" E 122.26S 00°01'26" E 94.6599.657.10S 44°46'10" EO v e r h e a d W i r e sO v e r h e a d W i r e sO v e r h e a d W i r e sO v e r h e a d W i r e slandscape timberslandscape timbersC o n c r e t eC o n c r e t eC o n c r e t eD e c k Concrete curb B i t u m i n o u s P o r c hlandscape timbersC o n c.cant. S 00°08'06" W Meas 100.0 PlatMeas 95.0 Plat ABBOTT AVE. S. A L L E YA L L E YA L L E Y606014 146014 brick planter49.8244.8249.82 49.82S 89°30'54" E 127.39Meas. 127.94 PlatMeas. 122.93 Plat20.428.8 L O T 1L O T 2B L O C K 134.931.3 35.39" VCP Sanitary Sewer 6" CIP Watermain 892893 8938958928938948928928928928928928921-STORY FRAMENo.5928 1-STORY FRAMENo.5924P a v e r s1-STORY FRAMENo.3400 894.6893.54.3 5.3892.2F:\survey\harriet manor 2nd addition - hennepin\8-9-5\01 Surveying - 88918\01 CAD\01 Source\01 Survey Base.dwgFile No.F.B. No. 1113-49 inv. 88918CertificationPETE & LYNDA MICHIELUTTI5433 WOODCREST DRIVEEDINA, MN 55424 Legal Description Signed: ____________________________________________ Gregory R. Prasch Registration No. 24992Prepared this 1st day of April 2020.The only easements shown are from plats of record or information provided by client.I certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly Licensed land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota.PRELIMINARY PLAT Zoning & Development Information7601 73rd Avenue NorthMinneapolis, Minnesota 55428(763) 560-3093DemarcInc.comMICHIELUTTI ADDITIONPRELIMINARY PLATMiscellaneous NotesSurveyor:DemarcSurveying and Engineering7601 73rd Avenue N.Brooklyn Park, MN 55428Attn: Greg Praschphone: 763-560-3093fax: 763-560-3522e-mail: gregprasch@demarcinc.comPersonnel Legendx000.0Denotes Found Iron MonumentDenotes Iron Monument SetBollardLightPower PoleSanitary ManholeStorm ManholeWater ManholeCatch BasinGas MainUnderground CommunicationsUnderground ElectricSanitary SewerStorm SewerWatermainOverhead WiresDenotes Existing ContoursProposed Drainage & Utility Easements are shown thus:BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOININGRIGHT OF WAY LINES AND 5 FEET IN WIDTHAND ADJOINING INTERIOR LOT LINES,UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN.10 10 55R/W LineLot Line The land surveyed covers the entire parcel and there are no gaps oroverlaps with adjacent parcels.drawn by:Property Currently Zoned: R-1, Single Dwelling Unit DistrictProposed Zoning: R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District Zoning Ordinance Requirements: Building Setbacks (for living space unless otherwise specified) Front - 30 feet or average of adjacent homes Side Yard - 5 feet Rear Yard - 25 feet Maximum Building Height - 30 feet Minimum Lot Size - 9,000 sq.ft Minimum Lot Width - 75 feet Minimum Lot Depth - 120 feetRefer to City code for additional requirements or possible variations to those listed above.Proposed Number of Lots = 2Area of proposed: Lot 1, Block 1 = 6,391 sq.ft Lot 2, Block 1 = 6,331 sq.ft Right-of-Way Dedication = 0 sq.ftAverage square footage of all Lots = 6341 sq.ftLots 8 and 9, Block 5, HARRIET MANOR SECOND ADDITION,Hennepin County, MinnesotaProperty Address:5928 Abbott Avenue S., Edina, MN 55410Property Identification Number: 20-028-24-31-0184Benchmark: Top nut of hydrant at Abbott Ave. S. and 60th StreetElevation = 894.71 feetTotal Area of Parcel = 12,682 sq.ftProperty is in Flood Zone "X" (an Area of minimal flood hazard) per FEMA FloodZone Map No. 27053C0364F, dated 11/04/2016.Title insurance commitment showing property description and anyencumbrances of record not provided, survey subject to change.MN 1MN 2MN 3MN 4MN 5MN 6MN 7Developer:Peter & Linda Michielutti5433 Woodcrest DriveEdina, MN 55424phone:612-819-8661Current Owner:Brian & Karen Hobbins5928 Woodcrest DriveEdina, MN 55424SHEET INDEX Sheet 1 - Existing Conditions Survey Sheet 2 - Preliminary Plat Sheet 3 - Tree Protection Plan Sheet 4 - R-1 Lots within 500 feet of Subject Property Sheet 5 - Grading Plan Sheet C1 - Erosion & Sediment Control Plan 891.8892.3892.2891.8891.8892.8893.2893.5GF894.1894.0FFE896.1895.9893.6893.2892.3892.4893.3tcc892.43tcc892.22tcc892.03tcc891.98tcc891.89tcc891.84tcc891.84PowerPole892.3GuyAnchorSign892.1891.4891.2891.3891.2891.65" quad891.4891.5891.4891.5891.6892.26"891.7FFE894.1892.6GGasMeter892.3892.3892.1892.6893.3892.5892.5891.9892.2892.3892.9892.6892.4892.7892.6892.5892.3892.3892.5892.6892.5892.6892.7892.6892.9892.6892.3892.0892.6Manholerim=892.44EElec.Meter892.3891.7892.5892.3892.2892.1892.3892.4892.5891.5891.3A/C892.0891.7891.7891.5891.548"892.5891.8891.6891.7891.7891.5891.9891.8891.2891.8892.1891.9891.6892.0892.1891.4891.4891.2892.0891.2GF892.6892.3892.3893.7893.7893.6893.4892.8GuyAnchorPowerPole892.5892.5892.5892.7892.9893.1892.9892.3892.3892.1892.0892.1891.7891.7892.0892.2893.6893.8891.928.212.12.318.010.611.64.922.220.064.0 S 89°30'54" E 127.53S 89°30'54" E 122.26S 00°01'26" E 94.6599.657.10S 44°46'10" EO v e r h e a d W i r e sO v e r h e a d W i r e sO v e r h e a d W i r e sO v e r h e a d W i r e slandscape timberslandscape timbersC o n c r e t eC o n c r e t eC o n c r e t eD e c k Concrete curb B i t u m i n o u s P o r c hlandscape timbersC o n c.cant. S 00°08'06" W Meas 100.0 PlatMeas 95.0 Plat ABBOTT AVE. S. A L L E YA L L E YA L L E Y606014 146014 brick planter49.8244.8249.82 49.82S 89°30'54" E 127.39Meas. 127.94 PlatMeas. 122.93 Plat20.428.8 L O T 1L O T 2B L O C K 134.931.3 35.39" VCP Sanitary Sewer 6" CIP Watermain 892893 8938958928938948928928928928928928921-STORY FRAMENo.5928 1-STORY FRAMENo.5924P a v e r s1-STORY FRAMENo.3400 894.6893.54.3 5.3892.2F:\survey\harriet manor 2nd addition - hennepin\8-9-5\01 Surveying - 88918\01 CAD\01 Source\01 Survey Base.dwgFile No.F.B. No. 1113-49 inv. 88918CertificationPETE & LYNDA MICHIELUTTI5433 WOODCREST DRIVEEDINA, MN 55424 Legal Description Signed: ____________________________________________ Gregory R. Prasch Registration No. 24992Prepared this 1st day of April 2020.The only easements shown are from plats of record or information provided by client.I certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly Licensed land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota.MICHIELUTTI ADDITIONTREE PROTECTION PLANMiscellaneous NotesSurveyor:DemarcSurveying and Engineering7601 73rd Avenue N.Brooklyn Park, MN 55428Attn: Greg Praschphone: 763-560-3093fax: 763-560-3522e-mail: gregprasch@demarcinc.comPersonnel Legendx000.0Denotes Found Iron MonumentDenotes Iron Monument SetBollardLightPower PoleSanitary ManholeStorm ManholeWater ManholeCatch BasinGas MainUnderground CommunicationsUnderground ElectricSanitary SewerStorm SewerWatermainOverhead WiresDenotes Existing Contoursdrawn by:Property Owner & Developer:Peter & Linda Michielutti5433 Woodcrest DriveEdina, MN 55424Lots 8 and 9, Block 5, HARRIET MANOR SECOND ADDITION,Hennepin County, MinnesotaProperty Address:5928 Abbott Avenue S., Edina, MN 55410Property Identification Number: 20-028-24-31-0184Benchmark: Top nut of hydrant at Abbott Ave. S. and 60th StreetElevation = 894.71 feetTotal Area of Parcel = 12,682 sq.ftProperty is in Flood Zone "X" (an Area of minimal flood hazard) per FEMA FloodZone Map No. 27053C0364F, dated 11/04/2016.Title insurance commitment showing property description and anyencumbrances of record not provided, survey subject to change.MN 1MN 2MN 3MN 4MN 5MN 6TREE PRESERVATION PLAN1SpeciesTree SizeTree HealthRemove/Protectunknown 6"Good RemoveBirch 5" quad Good RemoveUnknown 48" Good Protect32123TREE PROTECTION PLANSHEET INDEX Sheet 1 - Existing Conditions Survey Sheet 2 - Preliminary Plat Sheet 3 - Tree Protection Plan Sheet 4 - R-1 Lots within 500 feet of Subject Property Sheet 5 - Grading Plan Sheet C1 - Erosion & Sediment Control Plan F:\survey\harriet manor 2nd addition - hennepin\8-9-5\01 Surveying - 88918\01 CAD\01 Source\01 Survey Base.dwgFile No.F.B. No. 1113-49 inv. 88918PETE & LYNDA MICHIELUTTI5433 WOODCREST DRIVEEDINA, MN 55424 Legal DescriptionZoning & Development Information7601 73rd Avenue NorthMinneapolis, Minnesota 55428(763) 560-3093DemarcInc.comMICHIELUTTI ADDITIONMiscellaneous Notesdrawn by:Surveyor:DemarcSurveying and Engineering7601 73rd Avenue N.Brooklyn Park, MN 55428Attn: Greg Praschphone: 763-560-3093fax: 763-560-3522e-mail: gregprasch@demarcinc.comPersonnel Property Owner & Developer:Peter & Linda Michielutti5433 Woodcrest DriveEdina, MN 55424Property Currently Zoned: R-1, Single Dwelling Unit DistrictProposed Zoning: R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District Zoning Ordinance Requirements: Building Setbacks (for living space unless otherwise specified) Front - 30 feet or average of adjacent homes Side Yard - 5 feet Rear Yard - 25 feet Maximum Building Height - 30 feet Minimum Lot Size - 9,000 sq.ft Minimum Lot Width - 75 feet Minimum Lot Depth - 120 feetRefer to City code for additional requirements or possible variations to those listed above.Proposed Number of Lots = 2Area of proposed: Lot 1, Block 1 = 6,391 sq.ft Lot 2, Block 1 = 6,331 sq.ft Right-of-Way Dedication = 0 sq.ftAverage square footage of all Lots = 6341 sq.ftLots 8 and 9, Block 5, HARRIET MANOR SECOND ADDITION,Hennepin County, MinnesotaProperty Address:5928 Abbott Avenue S., Edina, MN 55410Property Identification Number: 20-028-24-31-0184Lot areas from Hennepin County Tax records.MN 1MN 2R-1 Lots within 500 feet of Subject PropertyMN 3R-1 Lots within 500 feet of Subject PropertySum Total 834061 6817.77 13804.51Mean Average 7943.44 64.93 131.47Median 6745 50 129.9SHEET INDEX Sheet 1 - Existing Conditions Survey Sheet 2 - Preliminary Plat Sheet 3 - Tree Protection Plan Sheet 4 - R-1 Lots within 500 feet of Subject Property Sheet 5 - Grading Plan Sheet C1 - Erosion & Sediment Control Plan 891.8892.3892.2891.8891.8892.8893.2893.5GF894.1894.0FFE896.1895.9893.6893.2892.3892.4893.3tcc892.43tcc892.22tcc892.03tcc891.98tcc891.89tcc891.84tcc891.84PowerPole892.3GuyAnchorSign892.1891.4891.2891.3891.2891.6891.5891.4891.5891.6892.2892.3892.1892.6893.3892.5892.5891.9892.2892.3892.9892.6892.4892.3892.3892.0892.6Manholerim=892.44892.2892.1892.3891.548"892.5891.8891.6891.7891.7891.5891.9891.8891.2891.8892.1891.9891.6892.0892.1891.4891.4891.2892.0891.2892.3892.3893.7893.7893.6893.4892.8GuyAnchorPowerPole892.5892.5892.5892.7892.9893.1892.9892.3892.3892.1892.0892.1891.7891.7892.0892.2893.6893.8891.9S 89°30'54" E 127.53S 89°30'54" E 122.26S 00°01'26" E 94.6599.657.10S 44°46'10" EO v e r h e a d W i r e sO v e r h e a d W i r e sO v e r h e a d W i r e sO v e r h e a d W i r e slandscape timberslandscape timbersC o n c r e t eC o n c r e t eC o n c r e t eD e c k Concrete curb P o r c hlandscape timbersC o n c.cant. S 00°08'06" W Meas 100.0 PlatMeas 95.0 Plat ABBOTT AVE. S. A L L E YA L L E YA L L E Y606014 146014 brick planter49.8244.8249.82 49.82S 89°30'54" E 127.39Meas. 127.94 PlatMeas. 122.93 Plat20.428.8 L O T 1L O T 2B L O C K 135.34%+-4%+-GF=894.1Max 1st Flr=895.1GF=894.1Max 1st Flr=895.1 9" VCP Sanitary Sewer 6" CIP Watermain 892893 893895892893894892892892892892892892 893 894 893894891891892892893893 891891892892893893.9893.9 894.1 894.1893.41-STORY FRAMENo.5924P a v e r s1-STORY FRAMENo.3400 894.6893.55.3892.2892F:\survey\harriet manor 2nd addition - hennepin\8-9-5\01 Surveying - 88918\01 CAD\01 Source\01 Survey Base.dwgFile No.F.B. No. 1113-49 inv. 88918CertificationPETE & LYNDA MICHIELUTTI5433 WOODCREST DRIVEEDINA, MN 55424 Legal Description Signed: ____________________________________________ Gregory R. Prasch Registration No. 24992Prepared this 1st day of April 2020.The only easements shown are from plats of record or information provided by client.I certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly Licensed land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota.GRADING PLANZoning & Development Information7601 73rd Avenue NorthMinneapolis, Minnesota 55428(763) 560-3093DemarcInc.comMICHIELUTTI ADDITIONGRADING PLANMiscellaneous NotesSurveyor:DemarcSurveying and Engineering7601 73rd Avenue N.Brooklyn Park, MN 55428Attn: Greg Praschphone: 763-560-3093fax: 763-560-3522e-mail: gregprasch@demarcinc.comPersonnel Legendx000.0Denotes Found Iron MonumentDenotes Iron Monument SetBollardLightPower PoleSanitary ManholeStorm ManholeWater ManholeCatch BasinGas MainUnderground CommunicationsUnderground ElectricSanitary SewerStorm SewerWatermainOverhead WiresDenotes Existing ContoursProposed Drainage & Utility Easements are shown thus:BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOININGRIGHT OF WAY LINES AND 5 FEET IN WIDTHAND ADJOINING INTERIOR LOT LINES,UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN.10 10 55R/W LineLot Line Original First Floor Elevation = 894.1Maximum First Floor Elevation = 895.1drawn by:Property Currently Zoned: R-1, Single Dwelling Unit DistrictProposed Zoning: R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District Zoning Ordinance Requirements: Building Setbacks (for living space unless otherwise specified) Front - 30 feet or average of adjacent homes Side Yard - 5 feet Rear Yard - 25 feet Maximum Building Height - 30 feet Minimum Lot Size - 9,000 sq.ft Minimum Lot Width - 75 feet Minimum Lot Depth - 120 feetRefer to City code for additional requirements or possible variations to those listed above.Proposed Number of Lots = 2Area of proposed: Lot 1, Block 1 = 6,391 sq.ft Lot 2, Block 1 = 6,331 sq.ft Right-of-Way Dedication = 0 sq.ftAverage square footage of all Lots = 6341 sq.ftLots 8 and 9, Block 5, HARRIET MANOR SECOND ADDITION,Hennepin County, MinnesotaProperty Address:5928 Abbott Avenue S., Edina, MN 55410Property Identification Number: 20-028-24-31-0184Benchmark: Top nut of hydrant at Abbott Ave. S. and 60th StreetElevation = 894.71 feetTotal Area of Parcel = 12,682 sq.ftProperty is in Flood Zone "X" (an Area of minimal flood hazard) per FEMA FloodZone Map No. 27053C0364F, dated 11/04/2016.Title insurance commitment showing property description and anyencumbrances of record not provided, survey subject to change.MN 1MN 2MN 3MN 4MN 5MN 6MN 7Developer:Peter & Linda Michielutti5433 Woodcrest DriveEdina, MN 55424phone:612-819-8661Current Owner:Brian & Karen Hobbins5928 Woodcrest DriveEdina, MN 55424SHEET INDEX Sheet 1 - Existing Conditions Survey Sheet 2 - Preliminary Plat Sheet 3 - Tree Protection Plan Sheet 4 - R-1 Lots within 500 feet of Subject Property Sheet 5 - Grading Plan Sheet C1 - Erosion & Sediment Control Plan000.0Denotes Proposed ElevationDenotes Surface DrainageDenotes Proposed ContoursProposed Top of BlockProposed Garage FloorProposed Lowest FloorType of Building:894.4Proposed 1st Floor (maximum)895.1894.1885.7FullbasementProposed Building ElevationsNote: Original First Floor Elevation = 894.1 Maximum First Floor Elevation = 895.1Proposed Building Pad(not to exceed 2250 sq.ft)Proposed Building Pad(not to exceed 2250 sq.ft)GENERAL GRADING NOTES:1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, FINISHED SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 3H : 1V. 891.8892.3892.2891.8891.8892.8893.2893.5GF894.1894.0FFE896.1895.9893.6893.2892.3892.4893.3tcc892.43tcc892.22tcc892.03tcc891.98tcc891.89tcc891.84tcc891.84PowerPole892.3GuyAnchorSign892.1891.4891.2891.3891.2891.6891.5891.4891.5891.6892.2892.3892.1892.6893.3892.5892.5891.9892.2892.3892.9892.6892.4892.3892.3892.0892.6Manholerim=892.44892.2892.1892.3891.548"892.5891.8891.6891.7891.7891.5891.9891.8891.2891.8892.1891.9891.6892.0892.1891.4891.4891.2892.0891.2892.3892.3893.7893.7893.6893.4892.8GuyAnchorPowerPole892.5892.5892.5892.7892.9893.1892.9892.3892.3892.1892.0892.1891.7891.7892.0892.2893.6893.8891.9O v e r h e a d W i r e sO v e r h e a d W i r e slandscape timbersC o n c r e t eC o n c r e t e ABBOTT AVE. S. A L L E YA L L E YA L L E Y606014 14601428.8 L O T 1L O T 2B L O C K 135.34%+-4%+-GF=894.1Max 1st Flr=895.1GF=894.1Max 1st Flr=895.1 9" VCP Sanitary Sewer 6" CIP Watermain 892893 8938 9 5 8928938 94 892892892892892892 892 8 9 3 894 8 9 3 894891891892892893893 891891892892893893.9893.9 894.1 894.1893.41-STORY FRAMENo.5924894.6893.55.3892.2892SCALE IN FEET20040F:\survey\harriet manor 2nd addition - hennepin\8-9-5\01 Surveying - 88918\01 CAD\01 Source\01 Survey Base.dwg C1 OF C1DATE:LIC. NO.:SHEET NO.PROJECT: 88918AREVISIONSDESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:MICHIELUTTI ADDITION5928 ABBOTT AVENUE SOUTHEDINA, MINNESOTAEROSION AND SEDIMENTCONTROL PLANI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATEOF MINNESOTA.PETE & LYNDA MICHIELUTTI5433 WOODCREST DRIVEEDINA, MINNESOTA 55424JEFFREY A. PRASCH, P.E.04.23.2052706JAPJAPGRP7601 73RD AVENUE N, BROOKLYN PARK, MN 55428PHONE: 763.560.3093 FAX: 763.560.3522www.DemarcInc.comINLET PROTECTIONNOT TO SCALE2C1MINIMUM DOUBLE STITCHEDSEAMS ALL AROUND SIDEPIECES AND ON FLAP POCKETSFRONT, BACK, ANDBOTTOM TO BEMADE FROM SINGLEPIECE OF FABRICOVERFLOW HOLES (2 IN X 4IN HOLE SHALL BE HEAT CUTINTO ALL FOUR SIDE PANELS)USE REBAR OR STEEL RODFOR REMOVAL (FOR INLETSWITH CAST CURB BOXREPLACE ROD WITH WOOD 2IN X 4 IN). EXTEND 10 INBEYOND GRATE WIDTH ONBOTH SIDES, LENGTHVARIES. SECURE TO GRATEWITH WIRE OR PLASTIC TIES.LW1 2 W12 IN8 ININLET SPECIFICATIONS AS PERTHE PLAN DIMENSION LENGTH ANDWIDTH TO MATCH FLAP POCKET12 L5 FT MINIMUM LENGTH POSTAT 6 FT MAXIMUM SPACINGPLASTIC ZIP TIES (50 LBSTENSILE) LOCATED IN TOP 8 INGEOTEXTILE FABRIC,36 IN WIDETIRE COMPACTION ZONEMACHINE SLICE8 IN - 12 IN DEPTHFLOWFLOWSILT FENCE (MACHINE SLICED)NOT TO SCALE1C12 FT MINIMUMPOST EMBEDMENTEXISTING GROUNDFLOW45°STRAW SEDIMENTCONTROL LOG1 IN X 2 IN X 24 IN LONG WOODEN STAKES.STAKES SHALL BE DRIVEN THROUGH THEBACK HALF OF THE SEDIMENT CONTROL LOGAT AN ANGLE OF 45 DEGREES WITH THETOP OF THE STAKE POINTING UPSTREAM.BACKFILL AND COMPACT SOILFROM TRENCH ON UPGRADIENTSIDE OF SEDIMENT CONTROL LOGPLACE SEDIMENT CONTROLLOG IN SHALLOW TRENCH(1 IN - 2 IN DEPTH)8 IN - 10 IN EMBEDMENT DEPTHSPACE BETWEEN STAKES SHALL BE A MAXIMUM OF 1 FT FOR DITCH CHECKSOR 2 FT FOR OTHER APPLICATIONS.BIOROLLSNOT TO SCALE3C1EXISTING GROUNDSILT FENCE ORBIOROLLS (TYP.)GENERAL GRADING NOTES:1. THE CITY OF EDINA STANDARD SPECIFICATION MUST APPLY EXCEPT WHEREMODIFIED BY THESE DOCUMENTS.2. WITHIN 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION, THE CONTRACTOR MUSTNOTIFY "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL". (1-800-252-1166)3. PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, THE GRADING CONTRACTOR MUSTFIELD VERIFY WITH UTILITY COMPANIES, ALL ELEVATIONS AND LOCATIONS OFUNDERGROUND UTILITIES, AND THE ENGINEER MUST BE IMMEDIATELYNOTIFIED IF THERE ARE ANY CONFLICTS.4. SALVAGE EXISTING TOPSOIL TO PROVIDE 4" OF TOPSOIL COVER OVER ALLDISTURBED AREAS TO BE REVEGETATED.5. AFTER BIOROLLS OR SILT FENCE HAVE BEEN REMOVED, ANY REMAININGSEDIMENT ON SITE MUST BE GRADED TO CONFORM TO THE EXISTING GRADEAND BE SODDED OR SEEDED AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY ENGINEER.6. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, FINISHED SLOPES MUST NOT EXCEED 4H : 1V.7. THE GRADING CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE ON THESITE AT ALL TIMES.EROSION CONTROL NOTES:1. PETE & LYNDA MICHIELUTTI ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CLEANLINESS OFTHE SITE AND THE MAINTENANCE OF THE EROSION AND SEDIMENTCONTROLS.2. THE STREET WILL BE SWEPT CLEAN BEFORE THE END OF EACH DAY OFACTIVE CONSTRUCTION, WHEN SEDIMENT IS TRACKED INTO THE STREET.3. AREAS WITH SLOPES GREATER THAN 3 TO 1 AND AREAS NEXT TOWETLANDS/WATERBODIES GRADED OR EXPOSED DURING CONSTRUCTIONSHALL BE PROTECTED WITH TEMPORARY VEGETATION, MULCHING OR OTHERMEANS AS SOON AS PRACTICAL.4. ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS WILL BE STABILIZED AS SOON AS PRACTICAL.UNWORKED SOILS THAT REMAIN EXPOSED AND NOT IN USE FOR LONGERTHAN 14 DAYS WILL BE COVERED WITH TEMPORARY SEED (GRASS, OATS, ORWHEAT).5. NO CONCRETE WASHOUT SHALL OCCUR ON SITE UNLESS IT IS DONE WITH ANAPPROVED MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY (MPCA) DEVICE ORSTANDARD.6. STOCKPILES SHALL BE SURROUNDED WITH ADEQUATE PERIMETER CONTROLTO PREVENT SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION.7. INLET PROTECTION FOR ALL STORM SEWER INLETS DOWNSTREAM OF THESITE WITHIN ONE BLOCK OR AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY.8. SITE SHALL BE KEPT CLEAN AT ALL TIMES AND REFUSE PROPERLYCONTROLLED.9. TEMPORARY PUMPING SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED WITHOUT THE USE OF ANAPPROVED MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY (MPCA) DEVICE ORSTANDARD.10.SOIL COMPACTION SHALL BE MINIMIZED; AREAS OF COMPACTED SOIL WILL BEREMOVED OR LOOSENED VIA TILLING TO A DEPTH OF NO LESS THAN6-INCHES.11.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT ON A WEEKLY BASIS AND AFTER ANYRAINFALL GREATER THAN 1" ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AND MAKE ANYREPAIRS IMMEDIATELY. AN INSPECTION LOG SHALL BE KEPT ON SITEDETAILING THESE INSPECTIONS AND REPAIRS PERFORMED.ROCKSTABILIZING EXITROCK STABILIZING EXITNOT TO SCALE4C1PUBLIC ROADSURFACE FLOWCRUSHED ROCKPER SPECIFICATIONEXISTING GROUND6 IN MINIMUMGEOTEXTILEFABRICTAPER EDGESAT 1:11 IN - 2 IN CRUSHED ROCKRADIUS ASREQUIRED20' MINIMUM LENGTH EXIT WIDTH ASREQUIREDEMERGENCYOVERFLOW=892.30EMERGENCYOVERFLOW=892.506" SALVAGED TOPSOIL6" SCARIFIED SOILUNDISTURBED / NON-COMPACTEDSUBGRADEBOT. ELEVATION = 991.00280 SQ FT TOP 1V:3H (TYP.)TOP=892.0RAIN GARDENNOT TO SCALE5C134 SQ FT BOTTOM May 1, 2020 Planning Commission, Second Story Build (owners Pete and Lynda Michielutti), representing property owner Brian Hobbins, is requesting that the Planning Commission approve a subdivision of the property located at 5928 Abbott Ave. S. Edina, MN. Property is legally described as: Lots 8 and 9, Block 5 Harriet Manor Second Addition, Hennepin Country, MN. The lot currently has one home that is used as rental property. The block and most of the surrounding blocks have lots that are similar in size to the two lots the subdivision would create. As residents of Edina, the Michieluttis are committed to building quality homes that attract families and enhance the community. Our vision is to replace the existing home, which is used for rental, and create two homes that fit the character of the neighborhood. As builders, we have demonstrated our commitment to those values in the recent homes we’ve built in Edina: • 5817 Zenith Ave. (2019) • 5833 Zenith Ave. (2018) • 5904 Zenith Ave. (2019) • 6241 Crescent Drive (2020) Our construction partner is Tim Bellin with Bellin Construction. Together, we create a build process that is both compliant with all city guidelines and respectful of our neighbors. Our product is highly desirable, and all of our homes have sold within two weeks of listing (Crescent is coming to market in the next two weeks). We believe that by subdividing this lot in one of Edina’s more affordable and family-friendly neighborhoods, we can provide two appropriately sized and affordable houses that fit the block. Peter & Lynda Michielutti Second Story Build 612.670.9969 History of Similar Requests EdinaMN.gov 1 2&6 3 4 7&9 8 5 1 Approved 10 11 12 15 14History of Recent Subdivisions with Variances 1. In 2006, the property at 5901 France Avenue received variances to build four (4) 66-foot wide lots consistent with the area. (Median = 9,269 s.f. & 73 feet wide.) 2. In 2008, 6120 Brookview Avenue was proposed to be divided into two (2) 50-foot lots; however, the applicant withdrew the request before action was taken. (Median = 6,700 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 3. In 2009, a 100-foot lot at 5920 Oaklawn was granted variances to divide into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,699 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 4. In 2011, the property at 5829 Brookview was granted variances to divide into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,769 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 5. In 2012, the property at 6109 Oaklawn was denied the request to subdivide the property into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,701 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 6. In 2012, 6120 Brookview was again proposed for subdivision. That request was denied. (Median = 6,700 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 7. In 2012, 5945 Concord was denied the request to subdivide the property into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 10,028 s.f. & 77 feet wide.) 8. In 2015, a 100-foot lot at 5825 Ashcroft Avenue was granted variances to divide into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,790 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 9 In 2015, 5945 Concord was approved for a request to subdivide the property into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 10,028 s.f. & 77 feet wide.) 10. In 2016, 5845 Kellogg Avenue was denied a request to subdivide the property into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,715 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 11. In 2017, 6124 Ewing Avenue was approved for a request to subdivide into two (2) lots with lot width and area variances. (Median = 11,500 s.f. & 80 feet wide.) 12. In 2017, 5404 Park Place was approved for a request to subdivide into two (2) lots with lot width variances from 75 feet to 65 feet for each lot; and lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 8,705 and 8,840 square feet. (Median = 8,107 s.f. & width was 60 feet wide.) 13. In 2019, 5841 Oaklawn was approved for a request to subdivide into two (2) lots with lot width variances from 75 feet to 50 feet for one lot; and lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 8,793 and 6,694 square feet. 14. In 2019, 4625 Lexington was approved for a request to subdivide into two (2) lots with lot width variances from 75 feet to 60 feet for both lots, and lot area variances from 9,306 square feet to 8,106 and 8,128 square feet. (Median area - 9,306 square feet, median lot depth - 135 feet, and the median lot width 68 feet) 15. In 2020, 5928 Ashcroft was denied a request to subdivide into two (2) lots with lot width variances from 75 feet to 50 feet for both lots, and lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 6,813 and 6,790 square feet. (Median area – 8,841 s.f., median lot depth – 135 and median width was 66 feet.) Date: June 16, 2020 Agenda Item #: VIII.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2020-65 Parking Stall Variance and Site Plan for M Health at 6401 France Avenue Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to close the public hearing at noon, July 15, and to continue action on the item to the July 21 City Council meeting. INTRODUCTION: M Health Fairview is requesting a parking stall variance to construct a two-story addition above the existing 2nd floor of the Fairview Southdale Hospital. T he new construction would add approximately 38,206 square feet at the north side of the hospital facing the Crosstown Highway. The addition would be 52 additional inpatient rooms on the new 3rd and 4th floors. This project, along with future renovation focuses on the hospital’s movement from semi-private patient rooms (doubles) toward single patient rooms. T here is not an anticipated increase in staffing, or the number of beds in the hospital. There are no modifications to the footprint of the existing building or to the site plan. Better Together Edina Public Hearing Comments ATTACHMENTS: Description Planning Commission Staff Report: June 10, 2020 Resolution No. 2020-65: Approving Parking Stall Variance and Site Plan Amendment Applicant Narrative Traffic and Parking Study Proposed Plans: Building Elevations Site Survey Existing Landscape Plan June 10, 2020 Planning Commission Cary Teague, Community Development Director Parking Stall Variance and Site Plan for 6401 France Avenue. Information / Background: M Health Fairview is requesting a parking stall variance to construct a two-story addition above the existing 2nd floor of the Fairview Southdale Hospital. The new construction would add approximately 38,206 square feet at the north side of the hospital facing the Crosstown Highway. The addition would 52 additional inpatient rooms on the new 3rd and 4th floors. This project, along with future renovation focusses on the hospital’s movement from semi- private patient rooms (doubles) toward single patient rooms. There is not an anticipated increase in staffing, or the number of beds in the hospital. There are no modifications to the footprint of the existing building or to the site plan. (See attached project narrative and proposed plans.) To accommodate the proposed addition, the following is requested: 1. Site Plan Review. 2. Parking Stall Variance from 2,728 to 2,051 spaces. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Crosstown Highway 62 further north, single-family homes, zoned and guide low-density residential Easterly: The Colony Condominiums; zoned and guided for high-density residential Southerly: Southdale Medical Building; zoned and guided Regional Medical District Westerly: Fairview Hospital parking ramp STAFF REPORT Page 2 Existing Site Features The subject property is 13.8 acres in size and contains the Fairview Southdale Hospital and parking ramp, and a freestanding medical office building. The site is 16.7 acres in size when adding the parking ramp site on the west side of France. Planning Guide Plan designation: RM, Regional Medical (See page A5a.) Zoning: RMD, Regional Medical District. (See page A2.) Site Access The primary access to the site would remain be off 65th Street West. There are no changes proposed to the site. Parking & Traffic As mentioned above, a parking space variance is requested to accommodate the required number of parking spaces for the site. Based on the square footage of the hospital, medical offices, expanded emergency room, number of doctors and beds, 2,728 parking spaces are required for the entire site. There are 2,051 parking spaces on the site including both parking ramps. WSB and Associates completed a traffic and parking study for the existing and proposed hospital operations. (See attached study.) The study concludes that the existing adjacent roadways can support the proposed addition, and there would be adequate parking provided. (See pages 10-11of the study.) Landscaping The existing landscaping exceeds the City’s requirements. Based on the perimeter of the site, 85 over story trees and a full complement of understory trees and shrubs are required. The site contains 164 existing over story trees around the site & a full complement of understory trees and shrubs. Landscaping was added in 2013 with the addition to the hospital emergency room. Building Materials The existing building is architectural cast stone, stone, brick, metal panel, and glass. The addition would be metal panel and fiber cement. (See attached renderings.) The applicant will present a materials board at the Planning Commission meeting. STAFF REPORT Page 3 Compliance Table City Standard (PCD-3) Proposed/Existing Building Addition Setbacks Front – Crosstown Highway Front – West 65th Street Front – France Avenue Side – East 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet 100 feet 65 feet 200+ feet 200+ feet 200+ feet Building Height Twelve Stories or 144 feet whichever is less Two Story Addition (65 feet) Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 1.0 of the tract Tract size = 16.7 acres or 728,559 s.f. .99 of the tract Gross s.f. = 725,463 s.f. Parking Stalls (Site) 2,728** spaces based on the 1 space per bed; 1 space per 200 square feet of medical office and 1 space per employee on a major shift 2,051 spaces* Parking Stall Size 8.5’ x 18’ 8.5 x 18’ Drive Aisle Width 24 feet 24 feet * Variance Required Variance – Parking Stalls Per the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does meet the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The Proposed Variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. “Practical difficulties” may include functional and aesthetic concerns. STAFF REPORT Page 4 Staff believes the proposed parking stall variance is reasonable. A parking study was conducted by WSB Associates that concludes that the City Code required parking is not necessary for the Hospital site. The study concludes that the hospital could function adequately with 1748 parking spaces. There are an existing 2,051 spaces on the site. (See pages 9-10 of the parking study.) When the hospital was expanded for the emergency room back in 2013, a variance was also granted. WSB performed a parking and traffic study at that time that has proven to be accurate, as the parking has functioned adequately. The City of Edina does not want to require unnecessary paving or parking ramps for parking stalls that are not needed. 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-created? Yes. Again, the hospital site is unique in the RMD zoning district. It is the only regional hospital in Edina. There are no other 16.5-acre sites held in common ownership and zoned the same within the City. Again, the City would rather see green space and development rather than large parking lots or ramps that are not needed. 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The alternative to the variance would be to require the applicant to construct a larger and taller structured parking ramp, either on the west side of France or on hospital site. Based on the parking study done by WSB, this parking would not be needed. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the Site Plan with Variances for Fairview Southdale Hospital. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposal meets the required standards and ordinances for a Site Plan except for the parking space variance and drive aisle setback variance. 2. WSB conducted a parking and traffic impact study. The study concluded that the existing roadway system would support the proposed project; and the parking on the site would contain adequate parking to support the expansion and existing uses. 3. The study further concludes that the hospital could function adequately with 1748 parking spaces. There are an existing 2,051 spaces on the site. 4. The variance requested is reasonable given the WSB Study conclusions. 5. The west parking ramp could be expanded should there ever be a need for additional parking for the site. STAFF REPORT Page 5 Approval of the Site Plan is subject to the following conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped May 11, 2020. • Grading plan date stamped May 11, 2020. • Building elevations date stamped May 11, 2020. • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. If required, submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. Deadline for a city decision: August 5, 2020 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-65 RESOLUTION APPROVING A PARKING STALL VARIANCE AND SITE PLAN AMENDMENT AT 6401 FRANCE AVENUE FOR M HEALTH BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 M Health Fairview is requesting a parking stall variance to construct a two-story addition above the existing 2nd floor of the Fairview Southdale Hospital. The new construction would add approximately 38,206 square feet at the north side of the hospital facing the Crosstown Highway. The addition would 52 additional inpatient rooms on the new 3rd and 4th floors. This project, along with future renovation focusses on the hospital’s movement from semi- private patient rooms (doubles) toward single patient rooms. 1.02 There is not an anticipated increase in staffing, or the number of beds in the hospital. There are no modifications to the footprint of the existing building or to the site plan. 1.03 The request requires the following: Site Plan Review. Parking Stall Variance from 2,728 to 2,051 spaces. 1.04 The property is legally described as follows: Tract A, RLS No. 1716 (6401France Avenue). 1.05 On June 10, 2020 the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval of the proposal. Vote: 7 Ayes, 0 Nays. 1.06 On June 16, 2020, the City Council held a public hearing and considered the request. Section 2. FINDINGS & APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the proposed site plan and parking stall variance from 2,728 spaces required to 2,051 spaces for the proposed expansion of the hospital at 6401 France Avenue. 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposal meets the required standards and ordinances for a Site Plan except for the parking space variance and drive aisle setback variance. RESOLUTION NO. 2020-65 Page 2 2. WSB conducted a parking and traffic impact study. The study concluded that the existing roadway system would support the proposed project; and the parking on the site would contain adequate parking to support the expansion and existing uses. 3. The study further concludes that the hospital could function adequately with 1748 parking spaces. There are an existing 2,051 spaces on the site. 4. The variance requested is reasonable given the WSB Study conclusions. 5. The west parking ramp could be expanded should there ever be a need for additional parking for the site. 2.02 Approval is conditioned upon the following: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped May 11, 2020. • Grading plan date stamped May 11, 2020. • Building elevations date stamped May 11, 2020. • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. If required, submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. Adopted by the city council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on July 21, 2020. ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) RESOLUTION NO. 2020-65 Page 3 CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 21, 2020, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2020. _________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk Date: May 8, 2020 To: Cary Teague - Community Development Director and Edina City Council Re: Fairview Southdale Hospital Inpatient Addition – variance request Dear Mr. Teague and Edina City Council, M Health Fairview and the Fairview Southdale Hospital are proposing an addition to the existing hospital. Please see the following project description and purpose for the submitted variance request. Project Description M Health Fairview proposes a two-story addition above the existing 2nd floor of the Fairview Southdale Hospital. This project, adding approximately 44,000 square feet at the north side of the hospital, will provide 52 additional inpatient rooms on the new 3rd and 4th floors. This project, along with future renovation projects focusses on the hospital’s movement from semi-private patient rooms (double rooms) toward single patient rooms. This project scope does not include site modifications. Variance Request The variance application submitted to the City of Edina is to address the parking stall total. A traffic and parking study, by WSB Associates, is currently underway and will be forwarded to the Planning Commission upon completion. The purpose of the study is to determine the potential traffic and parking impacts the proposed hospital addition would have on the existing hospital parking, site circulation and adjacent roadway system. The site is located in the southeast quadrant of TH62 and France Avenue. This variance request, with the support of the traffic and parking study trip generation and parking counts, proposes the actual parking quantity needed to accommodate the anticipated parking needs will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Thank you, Sam DiCosimo | Project Manager Design & Construction M Health Fairview 6401 France Avenue South | Edina, MN 55435 sdicosi1@fairview.org | www.fairview.org Office: 952-924-1566 | Cell: 952-288-4779 Employed by Fairview Health Services 701 XENIA AVENUE S | SUITE 300 | MINNEAPOLIS, MN | 55416 | 763.541.4800 | WSBENG.COM Technical Memorandum To: Mr. Cary Teague AICP, Community Development Director City of Edina From: Charles Rickart PE, PTOE, Principal, Traffic Engineer WSB Date: June 1, 2020 Re: Fairview Southdale Hospital Inpatient Addition Traffic and Parking Study City of Edina, MN WSB Project No. R-16166-00 Background The purpose of this study is to determine the potential traffic and parking impacts the proposed inpatient addition to the existing Fairview Southdale Hospital would have on the existing hospital parking, site circulation and the adjacent roadway system. The site is located on the north side of the hospital in the southeast quadrant of TH 62 and France Avenue. The project location is shown on Figure 1 attached in the Appendix. The proposed plan includes the two-story addition above the existing 2nd floor of the Fairview Southdale Hospital. This project consists of adding approximately 44,000 square feet on the north side of the hospital. The addition will provide 52 additional inpatient rooms replacing the semi- private patient rooms (double rooms) with single patient rooms. There will be no net increase in the total number of patient beds within the hospital. There is no change in existing surface or structured parking planned with the addition. The existing access to this area of the hospital is from 65th Street at two access locations. With the previous Emergency Room expansion in 2014, the ring road was modified to include a roundabout to accommodate the expansion and provide improved circulation and access to the 6363 building and the east parking ramp. With the current site addition, there is no modification planned to the existing access. The proposed site plan showing the location of the proposed addition is shown in Figure 2 attached in the Appendix. A Traffic and Parking analysis was completed in 2013 for the Emergency Room expansion to the Hospital. That analysis was used as the basis for this analysis of the current proposed site addition. The traffic impacts of the existing conditions and proposed site addition were evaluated at the following locations: • France Avenue at 66th Street • France Avenue at 65th Street • 65th Street at Hospital Driveway • 65th Street at Drew Avenue • 66th Street at Drew Avenue/Southdale Access The following sections of this memorandum document the analysis and anticipated impacts of the proposed site addition. Technical Memorandum Fairview Southdale Hospital Inpatient Addition Traffic and Parking Study June 1, 2020 Page 2 Roadway Characteristics The existing roadway characteristics, lane configurations and traffic control for the impacted roadways and intersections adjacent to Fairview Southdale Hospital include: France Avenue (CSAH 17) is a Hennepin County north/south 6-lane divided Minor Arterial roadway from south of 66th Street to north of 65th Street. Primary access on France Avenue is from local streets and driveways directly onto France Avenue. The posted speed limit in the vicinity of the Hospital is 40 mph. Improvements were recently completed on France Avenue north of 65th Street through the TH 62 Ramp intersections. These improvements increased the capacity of the TH 62 Ramp intersections and the southbound France Avenue left turn to 65th Street into the Hospital. 66th Street (CSAH 53) is a Hennepin County east/west 4-lane divided Minor Arterial roadway. Street access and access to adjacent developments are provided from this roadway. The speed limit posted on 66th Street is 35mph. 65th Street is an east/west City street with numerous access driveways including the Hospital access. The existing roadway configuration includes a single lane in each direction. All the driveway access points are controlled with stop signs, stopping the exiting movements from the developments. A 30mph speed limit is posted on this roadway. Drew Avenue is a north/south City street with numerous access driveways. The existing roadway configuration between 66th Street and 65th Street includes a single lane in each direction with a continuous center left turn lane (three lane section). All the driveway access points are controlled with stop signs, stopping the exiting movements from the developments. A 30mph speed limit is posted on this roadway. Drew Avenue north of 65th Street is a two-lane street providing access around the Hospital including access to the parking ramps and several Hospital related uses. The lane configurations at each of the study area intersection is as follows: France Avenue at 66th Street – Traffic Signal Control SB France Ave approaching 66th St – one right/through, two through, one left NB France Ave approaching 66th St – one right, three through, one left EB 66th St approaching France Ave – one right, one bike lane, two through, one left WB 66th St approaching France Ave – one right, one bike lane, two through, two left France Avenue at 65th Street – Traffic Signal Control SB France Ave approaching 65th St – one right/through, two through, one left NB France Ave approaching 65th St – one free right/through, two through, one left EB 65th St approaching France Ave – one right/through, one left WB 65th St approaching France Ave – one free right, one through/left 65th Street at Hospital Driveway – Side Street Stop SB Hospital Driveway approaching 65th St – one right/through/left EB 65th St approaching Hospital Driveway – one right/through/left WB 65th St approaching Hospital Driveway - one right/through/left Technical Memorandum Fairview Southdale Hospital Inpatient Addition Traffic and Parking Study June 1, 2020 Page 3 65th Street at Drew Avenue – All-Way Stop SB Drew Ave approaching 65th St – one right, one through/left NB Drew Ave approaching 65th St – one right/through, one left EB 65th St approaching Drew Ave – one right/through/left WB 65th St approaching Drew Ave – one right/through/left 66th Street at Drew Avenue/Southdale Center Access – Traffic Signal Control SB Drew Ave approaching 66th St – one right/through, one left NB Southdale Center Access approaching 66th St – inbound lanes only EB 66th St approaching Drew Ave – one right, two through, one left WB 65th St approaching France Ave – one right/through, two through, one left Existing Traffic Volumes As a result of the current Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic, updated traffic volume data was not able to be collected. AM and PM peak hour turning movement counts completed with previous studies were used to determine the existing 2020 estimated peak hour traffic volumes. Reviewing the historical traffic counts in the area, traffic has stayed somewhat constant or dropped in the past few years, however, in order to account for some growth in traffic from the previous counts a factor of 0.5% per year was used to estimate the existing 2020 traffic volumes. These counts were used as the existing baseline conditions for the area. Figure 3 attached in the Appendix shows the existing intersections and driveways that were analyzed as part of this traffic study, with the existing 2020 estimated AM and PM peak hour and traffic volumes. Background (Non-Development) Traffic Growth Traffic growth in the vicinity of a proposed site will occur between existing conditions (2020) and any given future year due to other development within the region. This background growth must be accounted for and included in future year traffic forecasts. In order to account for growth in traffic from the 2020 conditions a factor of 0.5% per year was used to estimate the 2022 and 2040 traffic volumes In addition to the regional background traffic, other specific non development related traffic was determined and included with the overall background traffic including: Avenue of France – The proposed redevelopment is located on west of France Avenue between 66th Street and Valley View Road. It is proposed to include a bank, retail, apartments, a hotel, general office and medical office space. It is assumed that it will be completed after 2022 and included in the background traffic for the 2040 analysis. DLC Residential Development – The proposed redevelopment is located in the northwest quadrant of York Avenue and West 66th Street. The redevelopment is proposed to include a 230unit apartment building with phase I and a 145unit apartment building with Phase II. It is assumed that it will be completed after 2022 and included in the background traffic for the 2040 analysis. The estimated trip generation for the additional background traffic is shown below in Table 1. The trip generation and traffic distribution estimates for the additional development traffic is based on traffic studies for each specific development. The table shows the AM and PM peak hour trip generation for the proposed uses. Technical Memorandum Fairview Southdale Hospital Inpatient Addition Traffic and Parking Study June 1, 2020 Page 4 Table 1 – Additional Development Background Trip Generation Use AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Total In Out Total In Out Avenue on France 663 377 286 812 281 531 DLC Residential 115 35 80 145 85 60 Total New Trips 778 412 366 957 366 591 Site Expansion Trip Generation The proposed Fairview Southdale Inpatient addition will not be increasing staff or adding beds to the current site license. The goal of the proposed project is to give every bed the hospital serves a private room and not adding any additional patient capacity. However, to ensure that a worst-case condition is reviewed, additional site traffic was determined for the Hospital addition based on traffic generation rates from similar land use (i.e. hospital) as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. The estimated trip generation from the proposed Fairview Southdale Hospital Inpatient addition is shown below in Table 2. Table 2 - Estimated Trip Generation Use Size AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Total In Out Total In Out Hospital Expansion 44,000 sf 39 27 12 43 12 31 Total New Trips 39 27 12 43 12 31 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition Traffic Distribution The generated trips for the proposed Fairview Southdale Hospital Inpatient addition were assumed to arrive or exit using driveways on 65th Street and circulate using the existing Drew Avenue. The site-generated trips were distributed to the adjacent roadway system based on several factors including the existing Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) and the travel sheds for the major routes that serve the area. In general, the Trip Distribution from the site was assumed to be: • 30% to the north • 40% to the south • 15% to the east • 15% to the west. Technical Memorandum Fairview Southdale Hospital Inpatient Addition Traffic and Parking Study June 1, 2020 Page 5 Future Year Traffic Forecasts Traffic forecasts were prepared for the year 2022 which is the year after the proposed expansion would be completed and for the 2040 conditions which represents the City’s Comprehensive Plan development time frame. The traffic forecasts were prepared by adding the projected annual background traffic growth, the projected non-development background traffic growth, and the anticipated Fairview Southdale Hospital Inpatient addition traffic, to the estimated existing 2020 traffic volumes to determine the future traffic conditions. Figures 4 and Figure 5 attached in the Appendix shows the projected 2022 and 2040 AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes. Traffic Operations Existing and/or forecasted traffic operations were evaluated for the impacted intersections and access driveway adjacent to the hospital. The analysis was conducted for the following scenarios assuming the existing roadway lane configurations and traffic control. 1. Existing 2020 Conditions 2. Projected 2022 Conditions 3. Projected 2040 Conditions This section describes the methodology used to assess the operations and provides a summary of traffic operations for each scenario. Analysis Methodology The traffic operations analysis is derived from established methodologies documented in the Highway Capacity Manual 2000 (HCM). The HCM provides a series of analysis techniques that are used to evaluate traffic operations. Intersections are given a Level of Service (LOS) grade from “A” to “F” to describe the average amount of control delay per vehicle as defined in the HCM. The LOS is primarily a function of peak traffic hour turning movement volumes, intersection lane configuration, and the traffic controls at the intersection. LOS A is the best traffic operating condition, and drivers experience minimal delay at an intersection operating at that level. LOS E represents the condition where the intersection is at capacity, and some drivers may have to wait through more than one green phase to make it through an intersection controlled by traffic signals. LOS F represents a condition where there is more traffic than can be handled by the intersection, and many vehicle operators may have to wait through more than one green phase to make it through the intersection. At a stop sign-controlled intersection, LOS F would be characterized by exceptionally long vehicle queues on each approach at an all-way stop, or long queues and/or great difficulty in finding an acceptable gap for drivers on the minor legs at a through-street intersection. The LOS ranges for both signalized and un-signalized intersections are shown in Figure 6. The threshold LOS values for un-signalized intersections are slightly less than for signalized intersections. This variance was instituted because drivers’ expectations at intersections differ with the type of traffic control. A given LOS can be altered by increasing (or decreasing) the number of lanes, changing traffic control arrangements, adjusting the timing at signalized intersections, or other lesser geometric improvements. LOS also changes as traffic volumes increase or decrease. Technical Memorandum Fairview Southdale Hospital Inpatient Addition Traffic and Parking Study June 1, 2020 Page 6 Figure 6: Level of Service Ranges for Signalized and Un-signalized Intersections LOS, as described above, can also be determined for the individual legs (sometimes referred to as “approaches”) or lanes (turn lanes in particular) of an intersection. It should be noted that a LOS E or F might be acceptable or justified in those cases where a leg(s) or lane(s) has a very low traffic volume as compared to the volume on the other legs. For example, improving LOS on such low-volume legs by converting a two-way stop condition to an all-way stop, or adjusting timing at a signalized intersection, could result in a significant penalty for the many drivers on the major road while benefiting the few on the minor road. Also, geometric improvements on minor legs, such as additional lanes or longer turn lanes, could have limited positive effects and might be prohibitive in terms of benefit to cost. Although LOS A represents the best possible level of traffic flow, the cost to construct roadways and intersection to such a high standard often exceeds the benefit to the user. Funding availability might also lead to acceptance of intersection or roadway designs with a lower LOS. LOS D is generally accepted as the lowest acceptable level in urban areas. LOS C is often considered to be the desirable minimum level for rural areas. LOS D or E may be acceptable for limited durations or distances, or for very low-volume legs of some intersections. The LOS analysis was performed using Synchro/SimTraffic: • Synchro, a software package that implements Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodologies, was used to build each signalized intersection and provide an input database for turning-movement volumes, lane geometrics, and signal design and timing characteristics. In addition, Synchro was used to optimize signal timing parameters for future conditions. Output from Synchro is transferred to SimTraffic, the traffic simulation model. • SimTraffic is a micro-simulation computer modeling software that simulates each individual vehicle’s characteristics and driver behavior in response to traffic volumes, intersection configuration, and signal operations. The model simulates drivers’ behaviors and responses to surrounding traffic flow as well as different vehicle types and speeds. It outputs estimated vehicle delay and queue lengths at each intersection being analyzed. 80 55 35 20 10 LOS A LOS B LOS C LOS D LOS E LOS F Not CongestedCongested50 35 25 10 LOS A LOS B LOS C LOS D LOS E LOS F Not CongestedCongested15 Signalized Intersection Unsignalized IntersectionControl Delay per Vehicle (sec.)Control Delay per Vehicle (sec.)SOURCE: Level of Service thresholds from the Highway Capacity Manual, 2000. Technical Memorandum Fairview Southdale Hospital Inpatient Addition Traffic and Parking Study June 1, 2020 Page 7 Existing Level of Service Summary Table 3, below, summarizes the existing LOS at the primary intersections in the study area based on the current lane geometry, traffic control and estimated 2020 traffic volumes. The table shows that all intersections are operating at an overall LOS C or better during both the AM and PM peak hours, except the intersection of France Avenue at 66th Street which would operate at an overall LOS D. Movements in all intersections during the AM and PM peak hour are operating at an acceptable LOS E or better. Table 3: 2020 Existing Conditions Summary Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS Overall Delay (sec/veh) LOS Overall Delay (sec/veh) France Ave at W. 65th St C (E) 25.5 C (E) 33.4 France Ave at W. 66th St C (E) 33.9 D (E) 45.4 W. 65th St at Hospital Driveway A (B) 4.8 B (C) 14.8 W. 65th St at Drew Ave A (B) 7.1 A (B) 6.4 W. 66th St at Drew Ave /Southdale Entrance C (D) 25.6 C (D) 26.4 A (A) – Overall LOS (Worst Movement LOS) Forecast Traffic Operations A capacity and LOS analysis was completed for the study area intersections for 2022 which is the year after the proposed Southdale Hospital expansion would be completed and for the 2040 conditions which represents the City’s Comprehensive Plan development time frame. The results of the analysis are discussed below and shown in Tables 4 and Table 5. Table 3 – Forecasted 2022, summarizes the anticipated LOS at the primary intersections in the study area assuming the current lane geometry, traffic control and estimated 2022 traffic volumes with the proposed Hospital Inpatient addition completed. The table shows that all intersections will continue to operate an overall LOS C or better during both the AM and PM peak hours, except the intersection of France Avenue at 66th Street which would operate at an overall LOS D. Movements in all intersections during the AM and PM peak hour will also continue to operate at an acceptable LOS E or better. Table 4: 2022 Projected Traffic Conditions Summary Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS Overall Delay (sec/veh) LOS Overall Delay (sec/veh) France Ave at W. 65th St C (E) 26.2 C (E) 34.1 France Ave at W. 66th St C (E) 34.5 D (E) 46.2 W. 65th St at Hospital Driveway A (B) 5.0 C (C) 15.3 W. 65th St at Drew Ave A (B) 7.5 A (B) 6.8 W. 66th St at Drew Ave /Southdale Entrance C (D) 26.4 C (D) 28.2 A (A) – Overall LOS (Worst Movement LOS) Technical Memorandum Fairview Southdale Hospital Inpatient Addition Traffic and Parking Study June 1, 2020 Page 8 Table 5 – Forecasted 2040, summarizes the anticipated LOS at the primary intersections in the study area assuming the current lane geometry, traffic control and estimated 2040 traffic volumes with the proposed Hospital Inpatient addition completed. The table shows that all intersections will continue to operate an overall LOS C or better during both the AM and PM peak hours, except the intersections of: France Avenue at 65th Street during the PM peak hour; France Avenue at 66th Street during the AM and PM peak hour, and; 66th Street at Drew Avenue/Southdale Entrance during the PM peak hour, which would operate at an overall LOS D. Movements in all intersections during the AM and PM peak hour will also continue to operate at an acceptable LOS E or better except the southbound left turn from France Avenue to 66th Street during the PM peak hour which would be operating at a LOS F. Overall and movement delays will increase from the existing and 2022 conditions, especially at the major intersections on France Avenue at 65th Street and 66th Street and on 66th Street at Drew Avenue/Southdale entrance. The increase in delays can be attributed primarily to the background traffic growth in the area. As the area continues to redevelop minor intersection improvements (additional turn lane length and signal phasing changes) could be implemented to address these issues and minimize delays. Table 5: 2040 Projected Traffic Conditions Summary Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS Overall Delay (sec/veh) LOS Overall Delay (sec/veh) France Ave at W. 65th St C (E) 36.1 D (E) 39.5 France Ave at W. 66th St D (E) 42.6 D (F) 54.3 W. 65th St at Hospital Driveway B (C) 11.2 C (D) 22.6 W. 65th St at Drew Ave B (C) 13.3 B (C) 13.1 W. 66th St at Drew Ave /Southdale Entrance C (D) 33.2 D (E) 36.6 A (A) – Overall LOS (Worst Movement LOS) Vehicle Queuing Analysis A queuing analysis for the existing, projected 2022 and projected 2040 conditions was prepared evaluating the anticipated vehicle queuing impacts at the intersections in the study area. The analysis was conducted using the SimTraffic simulation software. The results found that during both the AM and PM peak hours, for the existing, projected 2022 and projected 2040 conditions, the average queues in the corridors do not exceed any of the available turn lane storage. In some cases, however, for the 2040 conditions, the maximum queues were exceeded. The maximum queue represents the longest length of queue that was observed during the analysis period. The observations were typically identified one or two times during the peak periods with an extremely short duration of less than 4 to 6 seconds. Parking Impact Analysis The parking impacts to the existing Fairview Southdale Hospital and adjacent Medical office buildings were analyzed based on the current use of the site and proposed site addition. Table 6 below shows a summary of the existing parking available on the site. Currently there are two primary parking structures and surface spaces located throughout the site. These locations are shown in Figure 2 attached in the Appendix. Technical Memorandum Fairview Southdale Hospital Inpatient Addition Traffic and Parking Study June 1, 2020 Page 9 Table 6 – Available Parking Location Existing Spaces West Parking Ramp 1018 East Parking Ramp 975 Surface Spaces 58 Total Parking Spaces 2051 In order to provide a base line of the parking demand for the site, the existing parking use was determined based on previous studies and data provided by the property owner. Table 7 shows the average and peak number of occupied spaces throughout the site. Table 7 – Parking Use Location Average Occupied Spaces Peak Occupied Spaces West Parking Ramp 1455 1690 East Parking Ramp Surface Spaces 40 58 Total Parking Spaces 1495 1748 Based on the City Code the Fairview Southdale Hospital site currently require approximately 2728 parking spaces per City Code. As discussed previously, no increase in the total Hospital beds or staffing is proposed with the proposed Hospital Inpatient addition. Table 8 shows the required parking based on the City Code. Currently there is a parking variance for 677 spaces in place for the site. Table 8 – Parking Required per City Code Use Existing Parking Required Hospital 326 Beds, 1678 Empl 2004 6405 Medical Office 54,248 sf, 49 Doc/Dent 320 6363 Medical Office 69,442 sf, 56 Doc/Dent 404 Total Parking Spaces Required 2728 The parking demand for the site was also estimated using parking generation rates for other similar land uses as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Parking Generation Manual, 5th Edition. Table 9 below shows a summary of each use and what the anticipated peak parking demand would be for a typical weekday. This would represent the worst-case condition for the parking on the site assuming the existing and proposed uses. Based on this analysis, the existing parking required is very similar to the peak occupied spaces counted. Technical Memorandum Fairview Southdale Hospital Inpatient Addition Traffic and Parking Study June 1, 2020 Page 10 Table 9 – Parking Demand per ITE Use Existing Parking Required Hospital 1678 Emp 1225 6405 Medical Office 54,248 sf 175 6363 Medical Office 69,442 sf 224 Total Parking Spaces Required 1624 Based on the above parking summary, there is and would be sufficient parking available on site for the proposed Fairview Southdale Hospital Inpatient addition. Conclusions / Recommendation Based on the analysis documented in this memorandum, WSB has concluded the following: • The proposed Fairview Southdale Hospital Inpatient Addition project includes a 44,000sf, two-story addition, above the existing Emergency Room, on the north side of the Hospital. The proposed addition will not be increasing staff or adding beds to the current site license. • To ensure that a worst-case condition was reviewed, additional site traffic was determined for the Hospital Inpatient addition. Base on the traffic generation the site could generate up to an additional 39 trips in the AM peak hour and 43 trips in the PM peak hour. • Additional trips will also be generated from other approved or anticipated development in the surrounding area. These uses will generate an additional 778 trips in the AM peak hour and 957 trips in the PM peak hour. • Existing traffic operations at the intersections and driveways in the study area on 65tth Street and 66th Street are all operating at overall LOS C or better for the both the AM and PM peak hours, except the intersection of France Avenue at 66th Street which would operate at an overall LOS D. • Intersection traffic operations for the 2022 conditions, with the proposed Hospital Inpatient addition completed, shows that all intersections will continue to operate an overall LOS C or better during both the AM and PM peak hours, except the intersection of France Avenue at 66th Street which would operate at an overall LOS D. • Intersection traffic operations for the 2040 conditions, with the Hospital Inpatient addition completed, shows that all intersections will continue to operate an overall LOS C or better during both the AM and PM peak hours, except the intersections of: France Avenue at 65th Street during the PM peak hour; France Avenue at 66th Street during the AM and PM peak hour, and; 66th Street at Drew Avenue/Southdale Entrance during the PM peak hour, which would operate at an overall LOS D. • As the area continues to redevelop minor intersection improvements (additional turn lane length and signal phasing changes) could be implemented to address issues and minimize delays. Technical Memorandum Fairview Southdale Hospital Inpatient Addition Traffic and Parking Study June 1, 2020 Page 11 • The results of the queuing analysis found that during both the AM and PM peak hours, for the existing, projected 2022 and projected 2040 conditions, the average queues in the corridors do not exceed any of the available turn lane storage. In some cases, however, for the 2040 conditions, the maximum queues were exceeded. • The existing available parking does not meet the City’s Code. Assuming no change in the number of total beds or increase in Hospital employees, 2728 parking spaces would be required based on City Code. The current site provides for 2051 parking spaces. A 677- space parking variance is currently in place for the Hospital site. • Based on the parking count and the ITE parking generation estimates the total parking required for the Fairview Southdale Hospital site is 1624 spaces. With this estimate, no parking variance would be required. Based on these conclusions, no roadway improvements or additional parking variance would be required to accommodate the proposed Fairview Southdale Inpatient Addition project. List of Figures Figure 1 – Project Location Figure 2 – Proposed Site Plan with Improvements Figure 3 – Existing 2020 Estimated Traffic Volumes Figure 4 – Projected 2022 Traffic Volumes Figure 5 – Projected 2040 Traffic Volumes BEARDP L .ABBOTTZENITHYORKXERXESW. ST. W.ST.62HALIFAXGRIMES PEACEDALEHALIFAXAVE.AVE.VALLEY R D. W.62 ST.LA.RYANPARNELLVIRGINIAAVE.AVE.AVE.FAIRFAXOAKLAWNBROOKVIEWAVE.W.LA. nd HERITAGE DR.YORKAVE.BARRIERD.W .6 5th ST. W.66th ST.AVE.YORKAVE.XERXESAVE.W. 69th ST.RD.DAWSONLA.HILLCRESTLA.CORNE LIADR.AVE.OAKAVE.POINTDR.W.SHERWOODAVE.AVE.AVE.RYANPARNELLAVE.UPPER TER. W ILF ORD DUNBERRY LA. RD. LAGUNA DR. RD.CRESTONRD.ST.BRITTANYRD.DR. CT.LAWNW.70th ST. ANDOVER DU N HA M D UNH AM RD. LA.DR.KELLOGGGILFORD DR. DR. DR.AVE.CORNELIADR.R D.LA.LYNMARCI R.CIR.72 nd ST.GALLAGERFRANCEHAZELTON RD.YORKTER.W. W. PARKLAWN CT. W.76th ST. W. 77th ST. LA.DR.HIBISCUS AVE. LA.AVE.PHLOX LA.LA.CIR. INDEDINA W. 76th ST. W. 74th ST. ST.OHMSLA.METROBLVD.W.72nd ST. D ANE N'S D UG GA N DR.RI DGEPL.DR. DR.NAOMI PL.W. 64 th ST.WARRENMILDREDROLFTINGDALEAVE.AVE.AVE.AVE.AVE.JOSEPH INEW.63th ST.CODEAVE. LA. LA. 62nd ST. W. 61st ST. DR. nd 61 NCHOWE WAY MINNESOTA DR. VIKING DR. 31 31 17 17 100 100 17 100 5 31 494NOBHI LL DR. LA. st EDINBOROUGHWAYASP ASIAL A.TRILLIU M31.33. 35. 36.26.39..ROSECT.BLVD.RIAL TSU W. 73rd 62 COMPUTERRTER WILRYAN AVE .ATINGDVER RIDGERD.X VA LLEYV IEW RVECU ST.64 thKELW.61st ST.CROFTHASJOHN'SST.AIIGNVIR 35.ASHCROFTLA. SONRRIGA PLA Z AHAR VEY 38.RAB UNEVERETTR.DTIFT ONABERCROMBIE M EADO W KENNYPL.CIRCLEDR.EWR.AVE.WILRYANST.66th 64 th ST. ST.th65 VIRGINIAROYCAR PAYTON S OUT HCRES T69th BALFANZ ASPASIA LARKSPUR NARDOOM LA.LA. YPPPO W.SHORE DR.BEL VIDERE CI R. O RECLA R EM CLA R EM OREVE.AWOODJUDS ON LA .AVE.ELASOUTHD68th ST.SANDD R.ELLSWORTH OAKLAWNLA.MAVELL E GLOUCHESTERAVE.BLVD.BRISTOLGLOUCHESTERDR.BRIS T OLERTONHEATHTR.HEATHERTONW. PARKLAWN PARKLAWNAVE.AVE.SEDUMAVE.FON DELL 74th ST. 75th ST.MILLER'SLA.Ni neMile Creek V IEW DR.LYMARELLHIBISCU SAVE. Lake Cornelia Lake Edina SHOREWESTPLAZA DR.WOODALEDWOODDALEWOODCORNELIA CIR.AVE.COVLA.CT.PL.ENTRYCOVENTRYDR.DISCDREWAVE.COLONYWAYSOUTH DALE KELLOGGXERXESAVE.CIR. 53 64th ST.26.26.V.AWYMAN32.62nd ST.WSB Filename:Date: Printed:5/31/2020K:\016166-000\Cad\Exhibits\016166-000 Figure 1 Project Location Map.dgnTraffic and Parking Study Fairview Southdale Hopsital inpatient Addition City of Edina, Minnesota Figure 1 Project Location Map Study Area 0 SCALE IN FEET 700 1400 N Project Location MINNESOTA 62 MINNESOTA 100 31 COUNTY INTERSTATE 494 WSB Filename:Date: Printed:5/31/2020K:\016166-000\Cad\Exhibits\016166-000 Figure 2 Site Plan.dgnTraffic and Parking Study Fairview Southdale Hopsital inpatient Addition City of Edina, Minnesota Figure 2 Site Plan WSB Filename:Date: Printed:6/1/2020K:\016166-000\Cad\Exhibits\016166-000 Figure 3 Existing 2020 Estimated Traffic Volumes.dgnTraffic and Parking Study Fairview Southdale Hopsital inpatient Addition City of Edina, Minnesota 66th Street Drew AvenueHospitalFrance Avenue65th Street HospitalParkSouthdaleXXX Peak Hour Traffic (XXX) Figure 3 Existing (2020) Estimated Traffic Volumes 2020 AM PEAK HOUR 2020 PM PEAK HOUR 47 183 102 (83) (682) (114)(184)(582)(92)105552499144242(250)(982)(126)316 447 247 (239) (390) (236)(242)(18)(81)581633(58) (756) (31) 25 260 54 53 736 164 (125) (776) (59)27870296(89)(754)(28)(111) (95) (139) 38 201 75 15456374(76)(1211)(45)51 46 183 (52) (98) (86)9063(41)(1)(133)98986(12)(23)(50)5225(2)(0)(44)(11)(105)(147)53572(103) (64) (46) 63 111 142 33 105 24 (29) (106) (8) 11 192 18 (12) (359) (15) (84) (153) (25) 213 355 65 N WSB Filename:Date: Printed:6/1/2020K:\016166-000\Cad\Exhibits\016166-000 Figure 4 Proposed 2022 Traffic Volumes.dgnTraffic and Parking Study Fairview Southdale Hopsital inpatient Addition City of Edina, Minnesota 66th Street Drew AvenueHospitalFrance Avenue65th Street HospitalParkSouthdaleXXX Peak Hour Traffic (XXX) Figure 4 2020 AM PEAK HOUR 2020 PM PEAK HOUR(186)(588)(93)106558499244642(253)(992)(127)319 482 249 (241) (394) (238)(244)(18)(82)591633(59) (764) (31) 25 263 55 54 743 166 (126) (784) (60)28170997(90)(762)(28)(112) (96) (140) 38 203 76 15656975(77)(1223)(45)52 46 185 (53) (99) (87)9064(41)(1)(134)99087(12)(23)(51)5225(2)(0)(44)(11)(106)(148)53573(104) (65) (46) 64 112 143 33 106 24 (29) (107) (8) 11 194 18 (12) (363) (15) (85) (155) (25) 215 258 66 Proposed 2022 Traffic Volumes 47 185 103 (84) (689) (115) N WSB Filename:Date: Printed:6/1/2020K:\016166-000\Cad\Exhibits\016166-000 Figure 5 Projected 2040 Traffic Volumes.dgnTraffic and Parking Study Fairview Southdale Hopsital inpatient Addition City of Edina, Minnesota 66th Street Drew AvenueHospitalFrance Avenue65th Street HospitalParkSouthdaleXXX Peak Hour Traffic (XXX) Figure 5 2020 AM PEAK HOUR 2020 PM PEAK HOUR 348 525 272 (263) (429) (260)(266)(20)(89)641836(64) (832) (34) 28 286 59 58 810 180 (138) (854) (65)16961981(89)(1332)(50)10069(45)(1)(152)109895(13)(25)(53)6228(2)(0)(48)(12)(116)(162)63979(113) (70) (51) 69 122 156 36 116 26 (32) (117) (9) 12 211 20 (13) (359) (17) (92) (168) (28) 234 391 72 Projected 2040 Traffic Volumes N (122) (105) (153) 42 221 83 306772106(98)(829)(31)56 51 201 (57) (108) (95) 52 201 112 (91) (750) (125)(202)(640)(101)1166075410048646(275)(1080)(139) LEVEL 01 (E) 888' -0" LEVEL 02 (E) 904' -0 1/2" LEVEL 03 (N) 918' -2 1/2" LEVEL 04 (N) 933' -8 1/2" ROOF DECK (N) 950' -8 1/2" EXISTING 2000 CLINIC BUILDING - TAN FACE BRICK FIBER CEMENT CLADDING - OFF-WHITE METAL PANEL TO MATCH EXISTING BLUE/GREEN DICHROIC PANELS ON 2013 EMERGENCY CENTER WINDOWS WITH BLACK FRAMES, CLEAR VISION GLASS AND TWO DIFFERENT COLORED SPANDREL GLASS TYPES BUILDING SIGNAGE BY OWNER ROOFTOP CURVED METAL SCREEN WALL TO CONCEAL ROOFTOP MECHANICAL UNIT EXISTING 1964 HOSPITAL BEYOND - TAN FACE BRICK EXISTING 2013 EMERGENCY CENTER - BLUE/GREEN DICHROIC METAL PANELS EXISTING 2013 EMERGENCY CENTER - TAN CAST STONE WALL PANELS EXISTING 2013 EMERGENCY CENTER - GRAY METAL WALL PANELS ON AMBULANCE ENTRANCE DOORS EXISTING 2013 EMERGENCY CENTER - GLASS CURTAIN WALL - BACKLIT EXISTING TAN CAST STONE BASE WALL EXISTING GRAY METAL WALL PANELS EXISTING 1964 HOSPITAL - BEYOND -TAN FACE BRICK EXISTING 2-STORY BLDG BELOW2-STORY ADDITION ABOVELEVEL 05 (E) 1964 939' -9 1/2" LEVEL 02 (E) 904' -0 1/2" LEVEL 03 (N) 918' -2 1/2" LEVEL 04 (N) 933' -8 1/2" ROOF DECK (N) 950' -8 1/2" WINDOWS WITH BLACK FRAMES, CLEAR VISION GLASS AND TWO DIFFERENT COLORED SPANDREL GLASS TYPES FIBER CEMENT CLADDING - OFF-WHITE EXISTING 2013 EMERGENCY CENTER - BLUE/GREEN DICHROIC METAL PANELS EXISTING GRAY METAL WALL PANELSEXISTING 2-STORY BLDG BELOW2-STORY ADDITION ABOVEGRAY METAL WALL PANELS TO MATCH EXISTING BUILDING ROOFTOP PENTHOUSE - GRAY METAL WALL PANELS TO MATCH EXISTING BUILDING BACK SIDE OF ROOFTOP METAL PANEL SCREEN WALL BEYOND TEXTURED FIBER CEMENT CLADDING PANELS -OFF-WHITE LEVEL 05 (E) 1964 939' -9 1/2" WINDOWS WITH BLACK FRAMES, CLEAR VISION GLASS AND TWO DIFFERENT COLORED SPANDREL GLASS TYPES SHEET NUMBER TITLE Job Number ISSUE CHART PROJECT TEAM KEYPLAN PROJECT STRUCTURAL MEP / AV / TECHNOLOGY CONTRACTOR OWNER NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 5/5/2020 11:18:27 AMBIM 360://FSH - Inpatient Addition/ARCH-FSH-Inpatient Addition-R20.rvtA20-04 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 051722.001 INPATIENT ADDITION FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE HOSPITAL © 2020 Perkins and Will 6401 FRANCE AVE SOUTH EDINA, MN 55435 VARIANCE APPLICATION for CITY OF EDINA 8 MAY 2020GRAEF 120 SOUTH SIXTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 DUNHAM 50 SOUTH SIXTH STREET SUITE 1100 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 JE DUNN 800 WASHINGTON AVENUE NORTH SUITE 600 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 M HEALTH FAIRVIEW 6401 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH EDINA, MN 55435 IDS Center 80 South 8th Street, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55402 t 612.851.5000 f 612.851.5001 perkinswill.com 1/16" = 1'-0"1 NORTH ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"2 SOUTH ELEVATION MARK ISSUE DATE NEW 2-STORY INPATIENT ADDITION SHEET NUMBER TITLE Job Number ISSUE CHART PROJECT TEAM KEYPLAN PROJECT STRUCTURAL MEP / AV / TECHNOLOGY CONTRACTOR OWNER NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 5/5/2020 11:18:46 AMBIM 360://FSH - Inpatient Addition/ARCH-FSH-Inpatient Addition-R20.rvtA20-00 EXTERIOR AXONOMETRIC VIEWS 051722.001 INPATIENT ADDITION FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE HOSPITAL © 2020 Perkins and Will 6401 FRANCE AVE SOUTH EDINA, MN 55435 VARIANCE APPLICATION for CITY OF EDINA 8 MAY 2020GRAEF 120 SOUTH SIXTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 DUNHAM 50 SOUTH SIXTH STREET SUITE 1100 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 JE DUNN 800 WASHINGTON AVENUE NORTH SUITE 600 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 M HEALTH FAIRVIEW 6401 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH EDINA, MN 55435 IDS Center 80 South 8th Street, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55402 t 612.851.5000 f 612.851.5001 perkinswill.com 1 AXONOMETRIC VIEW - NORTHEAST2AXONOMETRIC VIEW - NORTHWEST 3 AXONOMETRIC VIEW - SOUTHEAST4AXONOMETRIC VIEW - SOUTHWEST MARK ISSUE DATE SHEET NUMBER TITLE Job Number ISSUE CHART PROJECT TEAM KEYPLAN PROJECT STRUCTURAL MEP / AV / TECHNOLOGY CONTRACTOR OWNER NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 5/5/2020 11:18:27 AMBIM 360://FSH - Inpatient Addition/ARCH-FSH-Inpatient Addition-R20.rvtA01-01 051722.001 INPATIENT ADDITION FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE HOSPITAL © 2020 Perkins and Will 6401 FRANCE AVE SOUTH EDINA, MN 55435 VARIANCE APPLICATION for CITY OF EDINA 8 MAY 2020GRAEF 120 SOUTH SIXTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 DUNHAM 50 SOUTH SIXTH STREET SUITE 1100 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 JE DUNN 800 WASHINGTON AVENUE NORTH SUITE 600 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 M HEALTH FAIRVIEW 6401 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH EDINA, MN 55435 IDS Center 80 South 8th Street, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55402 t 612.851.5000 f 612.851.5001 perkinswill.com MARK ISSUE DATE ARCHITECTURALSITE PLAN A01-01 OUTLINE OF PROPOSED 3RD & 4TH FLOOR ADDITION92' -0 "73' -0 " PRAIRIE CARE FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE HOSPTIAL 6401 FRANCE AVENUE S. R O OF T O P A HU EXISTING ROOF BELOW EXISTING ROOF BELOW EXISTING ROOF BELOW METAL SCREEN WALL 13" 13" 13" 11" ?" 6" METAL SCREEN WALL MECH CHILLER SLOPE1/4" PER FTMECHANICALPENTHOUSE 3RD & 4TH FLOOR INPATIENT ADDITION Note: This project scope does not include site modifications. This plan is intended to show the building addition relative to the entire Fairview Southdale Hospital Site. Site plan elements shown are from the 2013 Emergency Center Expansion project. HOISTWAY#4DEPT #221 SFPATIENT327WHEELCHAIRSTORAGE300C-1234 SFTEAMSTATION137 SFSOILED139 SFCLEAN123 SFDATA56 SFTLTPUBLIC85 SFNUTRITIONCENTER361 SFFAMILYLOUNGE95 SFJANITOR122 SFELEC123 SFCONSULT72 SFTLTSTAFF436 SFTEAMSTATION107 SFELEC91 SFOFFICEPRIVATE82 SFNOURISH115 SFCLEAN213 SFTELEMETRY68 SFTLTSTAFF109 SFSOILED76 SFTLTPUBLIC180 SFTEAMSTATION130 SFMEDS104 SF?120 SFOFFICESHARED241 SFSTAFFLOUNGELEGENDBuilding SupportInpatient RoomInpatient SupportInpatient CorridorNurse StationNurse / Staff CirculationPublic / FamilyVertical CirculationSHAFTPATIENTPATIENTPATIENTPATIENTPATIENTPATIENTPATIENTPATIENTPATIENTPATIENTPATIENTPATIENTPATIENT PATIENTPATIENTPATIENTPATIENTPATIENTPATIENTPATIENT??PATIENTPATIENTPATIENTPATIENTPATIENTPATIENT111 SFNOURISH101 SFMEDS23 SFEQEASTELEV 1LOBBYEASTSTAIREASTELEV 2106 SFWESTELEV216 SFWESTSTAIRSHEET NUMBERTITLEJob NumberISSUE CHARTCONSULTANTSKEYPLANPROJECTSTRUCTURALMEP / AV / TECHNOLOGYCONTRACTOROWNERNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION5/6/2020 4:49:40 PMBIM 360://FSH - Inpatient Addition/ARCH-FSH-Interior Fit Out-R20.rvtA10-03TYPICAL ADDITIONFLOOR PLAN051722.001INPATIENT ADDITIONFAIRVIEW SOUTHDALEHOSPITAL© 2020 Perkins and Will6401 FRANCE AVE SOUTHEDINA, MN 55435VARIANCE APPLICATION for CITY OF EDINA 8 MAY 2020GRAEF120 SOUTH SIXTH STREETMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402DUNHAM50 SOUTH SIXTH STREET SUITE 1100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402JE DUNN800 WASHINGTON AVENUE NORTHSUITE 600MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401M HEALTH FAIRVIEW6401 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTHEDINA, MN 55435IDS Center80 South 8th Street, Suite 300Minneapolis, MN 55402t 612.851.5000f 612.851.5001perkinswill.com3/32" = 1'-0"1TYPICAL ADDITION FLOOR PLANMARK ISSUE DATETYPICAL 3RD AND 4TH FLOOR PLANTYPICAL 3RD AND4TH FLOOR PLAN Date: June 16, 2020 Agenda Item #: IX.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Kristine Aaker, Assistant Planner Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2020-58: Variance Appeal for Cellular Antenna Tower Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2020-58 approving a 170.1-foot setback variance at 5200 Doncaster Way. INTRODUCTION: Crown Castle USA, the applicant, is requesting a 170.1 foot setback variance from an east lot line of 5200 Doncaster Way/Highlands Park, for a mono-pole cellular telecommunications antenna tower and park light standard replacement to allow for an additional service provider co-location. T he proposed project includes replacement of the existing park light standard/monopole antenna and the addition of an equipment structure. The public hearing remained open until June 10, 2020 at noon. Comments can be located on Better Together Edina. Regarding relocating the antenna/pole, Crown Castle received an inquiry regarding the feasibility of moving the pole to a location that is north and east of the existing location, generally in the area of the ground equipment. Crown Castle and City staff considered this location, but the location is not feasible or advisable for the following reasons: 1. A new access road would need to be constructed to accommodate large construction vehicles including a crane. 2. The location would require removing a significant number of trees in the area. City staff indicated that tree removal would not be acceptable to the City and should be avoided. The tower cannot be placed in the adjacent grassy area without interfering with the winter hockey frozen pond area. 3. Another tower would result in two towers in the park, which is inconsistent with the City’s co-location requirements. 4. There are significant slope and drainage concerns due to the existing topography in this area. 5. The tower would be closer to other property owners and presumably other neighbors would consider the tower equally or more intrusive. 6. The northern portion of the rink would not be lighted if the entire structure is relocated to this area (as opposed to two structures for the different carriers). 7. Moving the pole location would require a significant delay in providing the cell coverage needed in the area because both Crown Castle and the City would have to start the process over. Additionally, Verizon would need to evaluate the location. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report to Planning Commission, April 15, 2020 Resolution No. 2020-58: Approving Setback Variance Photo Simulation Crown Castle Letter to City of Edina May 20, 2020 Correspondence Submissions Applicant Justification Information Additional Information from Applicant www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-927-8861 • Fax 952-826-0390 DATE: April 13, 2020 TO: Cary Teague – Planning Director FROM: Perry Vetter, Parks and Recreation Director RE: Highlands Park – Review of Antenna Application on Park Property The Parks and Recreation Department has reviewed the proposed cellular tower installation project at Highlands Park. These comments are provided based upon the layout of the site submittal and are not intended to endorse the application on the basis of need, aesthetics or applicable use within a park property. These comments assume that those decisions have previously been made or are outside of staff purview. Tree Protection and Removals The proposed plan includes the siting and installation of cellular technology equipment in a currently unprogrammed, yet passive area of the park on the northern portion of the site to the east of the existing warming house. The area is located in and adjacent to a wooded hill next to an open space used for programming. In order to minimize site impacts to trees, the final layout of the enclosure needs to be staked by the applicant and field verified by parks maintenance staff prior to proceeding. Every effort should be made to protect the open space, slope and trees of significant value. Utility Access Path The proposed plan includes the installation of a utility access path from the parking lot turnaround to the proposed infrastructure. The layout of the path should utilize the existing maintenance path access from the turnaround parking lot. The path should be located to minimize maintenance issues by field staking the alignment to be field verified by parks maintenance staff prior to proceeding. The applicant is responsible for any required ADA compliance upgrades for this change of use. Permitting and Utility Locations The applicant is responsible for the location of utilities prior to construction and for all permitting applications required for the project. If permitting requires additional mitigation for the utility installation, the application should be revisited to determine those impacts to the park property. RESOLUTION NO. 2020-58 APPROVING A 170.1-FOOT SETBACK VARIANCE AT 5200 DONCASTER WAY BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Crown Castle USA, Inc. requested a 170.1 foot setback variance for a monopole cellular telecommunications antenna tower and light standard replacement to provide cellular service co-location for Crown Castle USA, Inc., at 5200 Doncaster Way/Highlands Park. 1.02 On, April 15, 2020, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and approved the variance. Vote: 8 Ayes and 0 Nays. 1.03 The Planning Commission approval was appealed to the City Council on April 25, 2020. 1.04 The property is legally described as follows: 1.05 Beginning at the Southeast corner of said East 1/2 of the Northwest ¼ of the Southeast ¼, then North 764.22 feet along the East lot line thereof, then West parallel with the North line thereof, to the West line thereof, then South to the Southwest corner thereof, then East to the point of beginning, Hennepin County, Minnesota 1.06 On June 2, 2020, the City Council held a public hearing. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 2.02 There are practical difficulties in complying with this Section: 2.03 The petitioner’s proposed use of the property is reasonable because the proposed use is permitted in the R-1 Single Dwelling Unit District and complies with zoning standards, with exception of setback. The practical difficulty is caused by the requirement to provide co-location and limited opportunities to locate on any other property. RESOLUTION NO. 2020-58 Page 2 2.04 The need for the variance is caused by the following circumstances that are unique to the property and were not created by the property owner because the location is within a city park, will replace an existing park light standard and monopole antenna that will accommodate another service provider and improve service. Co-location is a goal of the city for telecommunication towers. 2.05 The installation is a replacement of an existing light standard and antenna monopole. The proposed tower has been designed with flush mounted antennas to eliminate the adverse effect of the visual obtrusiveness. 2.06 The variance is consistent with the City’s Comprehensive plan because it will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The variance will be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Section because it is consistent with the existing conditions currently on-site. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Crown Castle USA, Inc. requested a 170.1 foot setback variance for a monopole cellular telecommunications antenna tower and light standard replacement to provide cellular service co-location for Crown Castle USA, Inc., at 5200 Doncaster Way/Highlands Park. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Subject to the survey and plans date stamped 3/11/2020. 2. Compliance with the conditions and comments listed in the Environmental Engineer’s memo. 3. Compliance with the conditions and comments listed in the Park and Recreation Director’s memo. RESOLUTION NO. 2020-58 Page 3 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on June 16, 2020 ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 16, 2020, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2020. _________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk Fredrikson 3®®®® & BYRON, P.A. May 20, 2020 VIA EMAIL ONLY TO CITYCOUNCIL@EDINA MN.GOV James Hovland Mayor City of Edina Mary Brindle City of Edina Council Member Kevin Staunton City of Edina Council Member Ron Anderson City of Edina Council Member Mike Fischer City of Edina Council Member Re: Crown Castle USA, Inc.'s Variance Application for a Monopole Antenna and Light Standard Replacement at 5200 Doncaster Way/ Highlands Park ("Application") Dear Mayor Hovland and Members of the City Council: I am respectfully submitting this letter and the attached information seeking the City Council's support for Crown Castle USA, Inc.' s ("Crown Castle") Application. Initially, two points are important. First, it is Crown Castle's understanding that the infrastructure is necessary for Verizon to provide coverage and capacity to local first responders as well as needed coverage for the public. Second, the property is currently being used as a communication tower, which is a permitted use. The infrastructure upgrade will permit for colocation. The City Council should grant the requested variance for three reasons: 1. The project at issue meets the variance standards. 2. The construction of the tower is in the best interest of the City to ensure reliable telecommunications, particularly for first responders. 3. The Federal Telecommunications Act supports the City's decision to grant the requested variance. As the Council is aware, City Staff and Crown Castle worked diligently to find the least intrusive means to place the upgraded infrastructure in the park. After several years of evaluating this Attorneys & Advisors/ Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. / USA/ China/ Mexico Main 612.492.7000 200 South Sixth Street, Suite 4000 Minnesota, Iowa, North Dakota Fax 612.492.7077 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402-1425 fredlaw.com Mayor Hovland Members of the City Council May 20, 2020 Page 2 situation and considering alternative locations, on April 15, 2020, City Staff drafted a detailed report and recommendation in support of the Application ("Staff Report"). Based on the Staff Report, the City's Planning Commission recommended approval of the requested variance. The City Council will be hearing this matter on June 2, 2020. Crown Castle appreciates the hard work from the City Staff and recommendation by the Planning Commission. lfthere are any questions in advance of June 2, 2020, please let me know. Crown Castle is also aware that a handful of neighbors have raised some questions. Crown Castle supports public involvement in these types of municipal processes and, in that vein, is submitting some additional information to assist the Council with its final determination. Background The proposed monopole antenna will replace an existing pole in the same location. The existing pole is 58.1 feet tall. The new pole will be 75 feet tall and will accommodate the collocation of providers. As noted in the Staff Report, the proposed pole encourages the "colocation of telecommunication facilities on the same tower thereby reducing the number of towers in the City." City Code, Sec. 34-70. As noted by Staff, the City Code also permits commercial use towers and antennas on publicly owned property. City Code, Sec. 34-70. The Staff Report fully addresses the standards in Section 34-75 of the City's Ordinance in particular noting that that the proposed tower is essential for the operation of the telecommunications system because [t]he current tower cannot sufficiently carry the load of Verizon's equipment," Staff Report p. 4 (emphasis added). As noted above, Crown Castle understands that Verizon is concerned about cell service for first responders, a concern that should be shared by everyone in the City. The upgraded infrastructure is part of a broader agreement between Verizon and the City. Based on a Master License Agreement between Verizon and the City (Exhibit A) ("License Agreement") the "primary use and purpose" of the agreement is to provide for traffic control, street lighting and the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of [Edina]. License Agreement, p. 3. 1 Verizon entered into this agreement in December of 2016 so that Verizon could locate its telecommunications equipment on existing poles owned by the City and located in the City's right-of-way. The City saw the opportunity to utilize existing community assets to meet the future communication needs of its citizens. Furthermore, the City added an additional term to the Agreement specifying the need to eliminate "dead zones" within the "Highlands Area" of Edina (License Agreement, p. 15). 'The Highlands neighborhood is identified in the License Agreement. (License Agreement, Ex. D). Mayor Hovland Members of the City Council May 20, 2020 Page 3 The variance requested here will help with the dead zone in the Highland Area and ensure that the language and spirit of the License Agreement is met. The health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Edina and mitigation of dead zones are critical considerations and far more than just a legal nicety. Crown Castle understands that recently the City's first responders have identified dropped calls and interference in the carrying out of pubic duties. Verizon has studied this issue using RF engineering tools and practices and has determined that there is consistent need to provide antennas at this existing subject site. Due to the ever- compounding demand placed upon the telecommunications network, which is comprised of both wired and wireless technology, users will continue to experience intermittent voice and data connectivity resulting in dropped calls, very high latency, and inability to stream video. New coverage and capacity issues result from the fact that there has been an 82% increase in mobile data growth in one year (2018-2019) and a significant increase in the number of Minnesota households that rely solely on cellphones to stay connected3 (56.2% in 2018). This project will provide necessary coverage and capacity improvements for the park and surrounding neighborhoods. To put it another way, it is in the City's best interest for "911" to work. In making public safety determinations, the City has the flexibility in its variance standards to have the flexibility to ensure that the City can take into consideration the unique circumstances and the best interest of the public. The Variance standard in the City's Ordinance and the corresponding Minnesota Statute (Minn. Stat. 462.357) is a "practical difficulties standard": "Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that "the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by an official control; the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality." Minn. Stat. Sec. 462.357. City Staff diligently evaluated the variance standards and the Planning Commission recommended approval. As they are all in the Staff Report, I will only address one of the standards here that best summarizes the situation: 2 Source: "Annual Wireless Industry Survey." CTIA, 2019 3 Source: "National Health Interview Survey." CDC, 2020 Mayor Hovland Members of the City Council May 20, 2020 Page 4 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-created. [Staff]: Yes, the location is within a city park, will replace an existing park light standard and monopole antenna that will accommodate another service provider. Colocation is a goal of the city of telecommunication towers. Staff Report, p. 4 ( emphasis added). 4 Public Comments We have reviewed the general comments from the public. Crown Castle appreciates the comments as should the City. However, we are not aware of any evidence or data that has been submitted to support these statements. Without dismissing the comments from the public, the Council should make its decision based on the factors as reviewed and analyzed by the Staff, rather than the opposition by a handful of neighbors. Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass'n v City of Chanhassen, 342 N.W.2d 335, 340 (Minn. 1984) (holding that "denial of a conditional use must be based on something more concrete than neighborhood opposition and expressions of concern for public safety and welfare"). Though not relevant to the variance standards (or Federal Law), Crown Castle is respectfully submitting the information attached hereto as Exhibit B in response to the handful of comments. As succinctly stated, Overwhelming scientific evidence shows no known health risk to humans from RF energy emitted by wireless devices, including smartphones. This evidence includes numerous, independent analyses of peer-reviewed studies conducted over several decades by national and international organizations. Federal government statistics show the number of brain tumors has remained unchanged since mobile phones were widely introduced in the 1980s while the number of mobile phones and sites has increased significantly, by a factor of 325 and 140, respectively. (Exhibit B). This conclusion is universally shared by the credible experts including: The Federal Communications Commission, The World Health Organization, 4 City Staff also addressed the remaining variance standards. Mayor Hovland Members of the City Council May 20, 2020 Page 5 The American Cancer Society, The National Institutes of Health, The U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, The Governm ent of Canada, The European Commission, The United Kingdom Health Protection Agency, Forte (Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare), Norwegian Institute of Public Health, and The Australian Rational Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency. (Exhibit C). 5 To summarize, Crown Castle steadfastly asserts (a) that it is entitled to the variance requested as recommended by Staff and the Planning Commission and (b) the concerns raised by the neighbors lack scientific support. Additionally, it is worth noting that (purely as a legal matter) this type of communication infrastructure is protected by the Telecommunications Act. See 47 U.S.C. §§ 253 and 332( c )(7). 5 There was a public comment about some noise generated by the tower. This issue has been reviewed and addressed as part of routine maintenance. Mayor Hovland Members of the City Council May 20, 2020 Page 6 Conclusion Crown Castle has more than a 25-year track record of building and operating communication infrastructure. It works very closely with the communities it serves and local units of government to ensure a productive relationship. It conducts regular maintenance to minimize downtime and monitors its sites 24/7/365. It looks forward to a continued working relationship with the City of Edina and respectfully requests approval of the variances. Thank you for your attention to this matter. ail: hroston@fredlaw.com HAR:ras/70109503 vi MASTER LICENSE AGREEMENT This Master License Agreement (the "Agreement") made this G" day or L/local@, 2016, between the CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, with its principal offices located at 4801 West 50 Street, Edina, MN 553424, hereinafter designated as "LICENSOR" and VERIZON WIRELESS (VA W) LLC d/b/a VERIZON WIRELESS, with its principal offices located at One Verizon Way, Mail Stop 4A Wl 00, Basking Ridge, New Jersey 07920 (telephone number 866-862-4404), hereinafter designated as LICENSEE". LICENSOR and LICENSEE are at times hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Parties" or individually as a "Party." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, LICENSOR is the owner of certain Poles, as hereinafter described, which are located within the public right-of-way of the LICENSOR (ROW") and LICENSOR further holds a leasehold or other possessory interest in, certain properties and/or facilities, which are located within the City (LICENSOR'S Property"); and WHEREAS, LICENSEE desires to install, construct, maintain and operate communications and related equipment for the purposes and uses as hereinafter set forth (the "LICENSEE'S Communication Facility") in and/or upon certain of LICENSOR'S Poles (as hereinafter defined), ROW and/or on LICENSOR'S Property; and WHEREAS, LICENSOR and LICENSEE desire to enter into this Agreement to define the terms, covenants and conditions which govern the use of the LICENSOR'S Poles, ROW and LICENSOR'S Property with respect to particular sites at which LICENSOR may grant a license to LICENSEE to construct, install, maintain and operate the LICENSEE'S Communication Facility; and WHEREAS, LICENSOR and LICENSEE acknowledge that they may enter into a license supplement in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A" (Supplement"), with respect to each particular location or site which the LICENSOR grants the LICENSEE a license to install LICENSEE'S Communication Facility for the uses granted herein. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the adequacy and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, for themselves, their successors and assigns, do hereby covenant and agree as follows: I. LICENSEE'S USE OF PREMISES a. Permitted Uses. Subject to the terms, covenants and conditions of this Agreement, LICENSEE'S Communication Facility may be used solely for the following purposes: (i) the transmission and reception of wireless communication signals, including, but not limited to, wireless and internet services and uses incidental thereto ("LICENSEE'S Wireless Services"); and (ii) for the purpose of installing, repairing, maintaining, removing and operating LICENSEE'S Communication Facility in accordance with this Agreement and in accordance with the transmission and reception of wireless communication signals authorized for use by LICENSEE by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC") (Permitted Uses"). The use of the LICENSOR'S Poles, ROW and/or LICENSOR'S Property by the LICENSEE is non-exclusive, and LICENSOR reserves the right to allow LICENSOR'S Poles, 1 Master License Agreement City of Edina 186622v4 EXHIBIT A ROW and LICENSOR'S Property to be used by others, provided they do not interfere with LICENSEE'S use of LICENSEE'S Communication Facility. LICENSEE shall construct, install, maintain, repair, operate and use each Premises (as hereinafter defined) only in accordance with the terms, covenants and conditions of this Agreement, good engineering practices and in compliance with all applicable Federal Communications Commission ("FCC"), and other federal, state and local ordinances, statutes, laws and regulations. b. Before LICENSEE shall use any of LICENSOR'S Poles, conduits, conductor pull boxes, appurtenances and related equipment, ROW and/or LICENSOR'S Property under this Agreement, the same shall be more fully described in each Supplement to be executed by the Parties, and shall hereinafter be referred to as the "Premises", LICENSEE shall submit an application in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B" (the "Application") along with a proposed Supplement for each proposed Premises, and shall comply with all the terms, covenants and conditions of this Agreement. c. LICENSEE shall have the non-exclusive right, at its sole cost and expense, to use each Premises, as identified in each individual Supplement, for the purpose of constructing, installing, maintaining, repairing and operating LICENSEE'S Communications Facility consistent with the terms of this Agreement. d. If, in the judgment of LICENSOR, LICENSEE'S proposed use of the LICENSOR'S Poles, ROW, or LICENSOR'S Property, is inconsistent with the LICENSOR'S uses thereof and does not comply with the terms, covenants or conditions of this Agreement, or any of the LICENSOR'S ordinances, rules or regulations, the LICENSOR, in its sole discretion, shall have the right to deny the Application of the LICENSEE. LICENSOR shall within forty-five (45) days after the receipt of a fully completed and executed Application and a Supplement by LICENSEE, notify LICENSEE in writing whether the Application is approved or denied. If LICENSOR does not notify LICENSEE within the forty-five (45) days from the date that the Application was submitted, the Application shall be deemed denied. e. With each Application and Supplement, LICENSEE shall furnish LICENSOR detailed Construction Plans and Specifications for each individual Premises (Plans"), together with necessary maps, indicating specifically the Poles, ROW and/or LICENSOR'S Property, LICENSEE proposes be used for LICENSEE'S Communication Facility on each Pole, equipment necessary for LICENSEE'S use, including any existing poles to be replaced (Replacement Pole"), or any additional Pole, LICENSEE proposes to install (New Pole"), and any new installations for utility transmission conduit, pull boxes, and appurtenances. Upon execution of a Supplement by LICENSOR, for each Premises, LICENSEE shall have the right to use the Premises for LICENSEE'S Communication Facility and may proceed to install the same, according to the terms of the applicable Application, Supplement, Plans and this Agreement. LICENSEE and its contractors and employees shall perform all LICENSOR'S work at its own expense and in such manner as to not interfere with LICENSOR'S use of any Pole, ROW on the applicable Premises or LICENSOR'S Property. f. All Poles used by LICENSEE under this Agreement, including any Replacement Pole or New Pole installed by LICENSEE, shall remain and/or become the property of LICENSOR, and any cost and/or expense incurred by the LICENSEE for changes to existing Poles, conduits, conductor pull boxes, facilities, and appurtenances or related equipment, or installation of any Replacement Poles or New Poles, conduits, conductor pull boxes, facilities, or appurtenances or related equipment, under this Agreement 2 Master License Agreement City of Edina 186622v4 shall not entitle LICENSEE to ownership of said Poles, conduits, conductor pull boxes or facilities or appurtenances or related equipment. LICENSEE shall upon the completion of the installation of a Replacement Pole or a New Pole deliver to LICENSOR a bill of sale for the applicable Replacement Pole or New Pole in the form attached hereto as Exhibit "C" ("Bill of Sale"). g. LICENSOR reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to exclude any of LICENSOR'S Poles, towers, conduits, conductor pull boxes, appurtenances, ROW and/or LICENSOR'S Property from use by LICENSEE. II. PREMISES Pursuant to all of the terms, covenants and conditions of this Agreement, the applicable Application and Supplement executed by LICENSOR, LICENSOR agrees to license to LICENSEE the applicable Premises, for the Permitted Use and the construction, installation, repair, operation and maintenance of the applicable LICENSEE'S Communication Facility, together with the non-exclusive right of ingress and egress over the applicable ROW or LICENSOR'S Property, and seven (7) days a week, twenty four (24) hours a day to and from the Premises. LICENSOR'S light poles, traffic control poles, and other poles, including any Replacement Pole or New Pole and/or towers in which LICENSOR grants LICENSEE the right to use for LICENSEE'S Communication Facility are referred to herein individually as "Pole" or jointly as "Poles". LICENSOR'S ROW and LICENSOR'S Property are herein sometimes referred to jointly as the "Property". The primary use and purpose of the Poles and LICENSOR'S Property, inclusive of the Premises, is to provide for traffic control, street lighting and the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the LICENSOR and the general public. LICENSOR'S operations and use of the Poles and LICENSOR'S Property for LICENSOR'S Communication System take priority over LICENSEE'S use thereof. LICENSEE agrees that the following priorities of use, in descending order, shall apply in the event of interference with the LICENSOR'S Communication System for emergency public safety needs, Premises repair or reconditioning, or other conflict while this Agreement is in effect, and LICENSEE'S use shall be subordinate accordingly: (1) LICENSOR'S use; (2) Public safety agencies, including law enforcement, fire, and ambulance services that are not related to LICENSOR; (3) Other governmental agencies where use is not related to public safety; ( 4) Pre-existing licensees (if any); (5) LICENSEE'S Permitted Use. In the event there poses an immediate threat of substantial harm or damage to the health, safety and welfare of the public and/or Property/Premises, as solely determined by LICENSOR ("Public Threat"), the LICENSOR may take any and all actions the LICENSOR determines are required to address such Public Threat provided that promptly after such actions that affect the Premises, and in no event later 3 Master License Agreement City of Edina 186622v4 than seventy-two (72) hours after such actions, LICENSOR gives written notice to LICENSEE of LICENSOR'S emergency actions. If LICENSOR determines that the conditions of a Public Threat would be benefited by cessation of LICENSEE'S operations of the applicable LICENSEE'S Communication Facility, LICENSEE shall immediately cease its operations on the Premises upon notice from LICENSOR, and the Term (as herein defined) of the applicable Supplement shall terminate. In the event there are not sufficient electric and telephone, cable or fiber utility sources located at the Premises or on the Property, LICENSEE may request approval from the LICENSOR, by submitting to LICENSOR a written plan for installation, to install such utilities on, over and/or under the ROW and/or Property, to a Pole and/or the Premises as necessary for LICENSEE to operate its Approved Use (Utility Plan"). All electric, telephone, cable, fiber or other utility necessary for the operation of LICENSEE'S Communication Facility, hereinafter referred to jointly as "Utilities" shall be installed underground by use of direction boring or within the applicable Pole. LICENSOR shall, in its sole discretion, notify LICENSEE that it approves, denies or requires that the Utility Plan be modified within thirty (30) business days of receipt of the Utility Plan, and in the case of any denial or modification of the Utility Plan, LICENSOR shall state the reasons therefor. LICENSEE must, at the time of Application and at any future time as requested by LICENSOR, obtain and submit to LICENSOR a structural engineering study carried out by a qualified structural engineer, showing that the Pole or Poles are able to support the LICENSEE'S Communication Facility (Structural Study"). Said Structural Study must be signed by an engineer licensed in Minnesota per State Rule 1800.4200 and Minnesota Statute 326. If the Structural Study finds that any Pole or structure is inadequate to support the proposed loads of LICENSEE'S Communication Facility, LICENSEE shall not install the LICENSEE'S Communication Facility and the Application shall be denied. III. INSTALLATION OF LICENSEE'S COMMUNICATION FACILITY a. Plans LICENSEE shall provide LICENSOR with two (2) sets of the Plans consisting of the following: For the initial installation of the applicable LICENSEE'S Communication Facility and for any and all subsequent revisions and/or modifications thereof, or additions thereto; Line or CAD drawings showing the location and materials of the planned installations of the applicable LICENSEE'S Communication Facility and an Engineer's Estimate of all materials and construction methods; Diagrams, Shop Drawings and Pictures of the applicable LICENSEE'S Communication Facility; A complete and detailed inventory of all of LICENSEE'S antennas, cable and other equipment and personal property of LICENSEE'S Communication Facility to be installed on the Premises; 4 Master License Agreement City of Edina 186622v4 All Plans shall be easily readable and subject to the written approval by LICENSOR prior to installation of the applicable LICENSEE'S Communication Facility, which approval shall not be withheld, conditioned or delayed without cause. LICENSOR shall have forty-five (45) business days to review and comment on the Plans. Should the Plans need to be revised based on the comments provided by LICENSOR and/or LICENSOR'S structural engineer, no construction of the applicable LICENSEE'S Communication Facility shall comm ence until final approval has been granted by LICENSOR. The Plans shall have affixed to them the signature of LICENSEE'S engineer who shall be duly licensed in the State of Minnesota per Minnesota Rule 1800.4200 and Minnesota State Statute 326. b. Construction Scheduling At least ten (10) business days prior to LICENSEE'S construction mobilization for installation of LICENSEE'S Communication Facility for the applicable Premises, LICENSEE shall conduct a meeting with LICENSOR and all applicable contractors on the Premises or other location as agreed upon and at a minimum the meeting shall be attended by a representative of LICENSOR and LICENSEE'S contractors and all of the parties involved in the installation of LICENSEE'S Communication Facility. C. Construction Inspection All construction activity shall be subject to inspection and approval by LICENSOR and/or LICENSEE'S engineers. Inspection may be performed at any time during the course of the construction activity reasonably determined by LICENSOR, at LICENSEE'S expense. Construction work performed without approval of LICENSOR will not be accepted and shall be removed or uninstalled at LICENSEE'S sole expense. LICENSEE shall be solely responsible for all costs associated with said inspection and approval of the installation of LICENSEE'S Communication Facility by LICENSOR and/or its engineers. d. Exposed LICENSEE'S Communication Facility All of LICENSEE'S Communication Facility equipment that is to be affixed to a Pole which has exterior exposure shall be as close to the color of the Pole as is commercially available to the LICENSEE. For exposed cables, wires or appurtenances, LICENSOR reserves the right to require LICENSEE to provide cables, wires or appurtenances in manufactured colors which are commercially available, in lieu of painting. e. Damage by LICENSEE of Pole and/or Property Any damage to a Pole on the Premises or the Property, or any other of LICENSOR'S structures or equipment caused by LICENSEE in any manner shall be repaired or replaced at LICENSEE'S sole cost and expense and to LICENSOR'S satisfaction within thirty (30) days of written notice by LICENSOR to LICENSEE setting forth the required repairs. f. As-Built Drawings Within thirty (30) days after LICENSEE activates the LICENSEES Communication Facility, LICENSEE shall provide LICENSOR with an "As-Built" drawing in electronic file 5 Master License Agreement City of Edina 186622v4 format compatible with LICENSOR'S record file system consisting of "As-Built" drawings of the LICENSEE'S Communication Facility installed at the applicable Premises or Property, which shall show the actual location of all LICENSEE'S Communication Facility equipment. Said drawings shall be accompanied by a complete and detailed site survey of the Property and an inventory of all LICENSEE'S Communication Facility equipment. g. Permits for Installation LICENSEE is required to obtain from LICENSOR, or any other applicable governing agency, any and all permits required for a complete installation of LICENSEE'S Communication Facility or any utilities necessary for the operation of LICENSEE'S Communication Facility, at LICENSEE'S sole cost and expense. Said permits shall include, but not be limited to: ROW Permits, Obstruction/Excavation, Meter Hooding, Storm Water, etc. permits ("Permits"). Applicable fees for any Permit shall be borne by LICENSEE and LICENSEE shall be bound by the requirements of said Permits. h. Alterations or Modifications. LICENSEE may not add, change, modify or alter any of LICENSEE'S Communication Facilities from that set forth and/or shown on the applicable Plan or as then currently constructed, without the prior written approval of the LICENSOR, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed; provided, however, LICENSEE may repair and maintain the LICENSEE'S equipment and may replace LICENSEE'S existing equipment with equipment that is substantially similar in appearance, without LICENSOR'S approval, provided the replacement equipment meets all of the conditions of this Agreement including all applicable Ordinances of LICENSOR. LICENSEE agrees to reimburse LICENSOR for all reasonable costs incurred by the LICENSOR in connection with any alteration, modification, or addition to, LICENSEE'S Communication Facility pursuant to this paragraph, including but not limited to plan review, structural review, site meetings, inspection time, and as-built updating because of LICENSEE'S changes, and attorney's fees for drafting and and/or reviewing documents. IV. MAINTENANCE, REPAIR OF POLES, PROPERTY AND LICENSEE'S COMMUNICATION FACILITY (a) Poles and Property LICENSOR reserves the right to take any and all action LICENSOR deems necessary, in its sole discretion, to repair, maintain, alter, or improve the Poles and/or the Property. (b) Structure Reconditioning and Repair (1) From time to time, LICENSOR paints, reconditions, or otherwise improves or repairs the Poles and Property or structures or improvements thereon ("Reconditioning Work"). LICENSEE shall cooperate with LICENSOR to allow LICENSOR to carry out the Reconditioning Work in a manner that minimizes any interference with LICENSOR'S Reconditioning Work. (2) Except in cases of emergency, prior to commencing Reconditioning Work, LICENSOR shall provide LICENSEE with not less than thirty (30) days prior written notice of the 6 Master License Agreement City of Edina 186622v4 Reconditioning Work, LICENSOR intends to perform. Upon receiving such notice, it shall be the sole responsibility of LICENSEE to take adequate measures to cover or otherwise protect the applicable LICENSEE'S Communication Facility from the consequences of such activities, including but not limited to paint, splatter and/or debris fallout. LICENSOR reserves the right to require LICENSEE to remove all LICENSEE'S Communication Facility during LICENSOR'S Reconditioning Work. (3) During LICENSOR'S Reconditioning Work, and with written approval of LICENSOR in LICENSOR'S sole discretion, LICENSEE may maintain a mobile site on the Premises or on any land owned or controlled by LICENSOR in the immediate area of the Premises. If the Premises will not accommodate mobile equipment, it shall be LICENSEE'S responsibility to locate auxiliary sites for LICENSEE'S Communication Facility during the Reconditioning Work. (4) LICENSEE may request a modification of LICENSOR'S procedures for carrying out Reconditioning Work in order to reduce the interference with LICENSEE'S permitted use of a Pole or the Premises. If LICENSOR agrees to the modification, LICENSEE shall be responsible for all incremental cost and expense related to the modification of LICENSOR'S procedures for the Reconditioning Work. ( c) Premises LICENSEE shall, at its own cost and expense, maintain LICENSEE'S Communication Facility in good repair, normal wear and tear excepted and in a safe condition, and in compliance with all applicable fire, health, building, and other life safety codes. LICENSEE shall obtain from LICENSOR any and all Permits required for the purposes of maintaining the LICENSEE'S Communication Facility and pay all applicable fees for any Permits required by LICENSOR. V. CONDITION OF PREMISES Where the Premises and/or Property includes one or more Poles licensed by LICENSOR under this Agreement, LICENSOR agrees to keep and maintain the Poles in good repair and condition as LICENSOR deems to be necessary for their primary use and in the ordinary course of business of LICENSOR. LICENSOR makes no warranty or guarantee as to the condition of any Pole or Premises with regard to LICENSEE'S intended use of the same. VI. TERM, RENT AND FEES a. Term. This Agreement shall be for an initial term of ten (10) years ("Initial Term") commencing upon the execution hereof by both Parties. Each Supplement shall be effective as of the date of execution of the applicable Supplement by both Parties (the "Effective Date"). The initial term of each Supplement shall be for ten (10) years, and shall commence on the first day of the month following the day that the applicable Supplement is signed by the LICENSOR (the "Commencement Date") and shall terminate on the termination of the Initial Term of this Agreement or any applicable Renewal Term of this Agreement. LICENSOR shall notify LICENSEE in writing of the Commencement Date for each Supplement. On the Commencement Date of each Supplement, payment of the applicable Rent shall commence and be due at the annual Base Rent as set forth in this Agreement and shall be paid as 7 Master License Agreement City of Edina 186622v4 hereinafter set forth. LICENSOR and LICENSEE acknowledge and agree that the payment of the initial Base Rent and any electrical service reimbursement payment, as hereinafter described, for each Supplement shall be made by LICENSEE within sixty (60) days of the applicable Commencement Date. b. Rent. To reimburse LICENSOR for its costs related to the management of the Premises, inclusive of Property management and the license for the use of a Pole and the Premises, LICENSEE shall pay to LICENSOR as and for rent ("Base Rent"), One Thousand Five Hundred and Noll 00 Dollars ($1,500.00) per year for each Pole described in a Supplement upon which LICENSEE has been granted approved for a LICENSEE'S Communication Facility. If practical, as determined by LICENSEE in its sole discretion, and if permitted by the local utility company servicing the Premises, LICENSEE shall contract with said local utility company, to furnish and install an electrical meter for the measurement of electrical power used by LICENSEE'S installation and LICENSEE shall be responsible for the cost of the installation of the meter and all electricity used by LICENSEE and shall be billed separately by the applicable utility company. If an electrical meter is not installed, as set forth above, LICENSOR shall be paid an additional $1,500.00 per year for electrical service for each Pole ("Electrical Service Reimbursement"). Each Supplement shall list whether an electrical meter will be installed or whether LICENSOR shall be paid for electrical service. The first year' S· Base Rent and any Electrical Service Reimbursement payment due on all Supplements with a Commencement Date, other than January 1, shall be prorated to the end of the year in which the Commencement Date occurs. For example, for all Supplements executed by LICENSOR and LICENSEE, the first year's Base Rent and Electrical Service Reimbursement (if any) shall be pro- rated to the end of 2016 based on the actual Commencement Date for year 2016 and the remaining days in 2016. Similarly, for all Supplements that expire or otherwise terminate on a date other than December 31 of any year, the Base Rent and Electrical Service Reimbursement (if any) shall be prorated from the beginning of the year to the end of the month in which the Supplement expires or otherwise terminates. Subsequent to the initial payment of pro-rated Base Rent and Electrical Service Reimbursement (if any) in the year of the Commencement Date, the Base Rent and Electrical Service Reimbursement (if any) due hereunder for all subsequent years shall be paid on or before January 1 of each succeeding year. LICENSEE shall pay LICENSOR in addition to the Base Rent, the following if not already paid by LICENSEE: (i) all building and Permit fees; and (ii) an administrative fee for this Agreement in the amount of Two Thousand Five Hundred and No/100 Dollars ($2,500.00) and an administrative fee of One Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($1,000.00) for each Supplement ("LICENSOR'S Administrative Fees"), which shall be paid within sixty (60) days after the LICENSOR sends LICENSEE an invoice for the applicable LICENSOR'S Administrative Fees for this Agreement or for any Application submitted by LICENSEE whether or not LICENSOR grants the LICENSEE the permit for the applicable LICENSEE'S Communication Facility. All invoices for Administration Fees shall be sent to LICENSEE at the following address: Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC, 10801 Bush Lake Road, Bloomington, MN 55438, Attention: Network Real Estate. Upon agreement of the Parties, LICENSEE may pay the Base Rent and Electrical Service Reimbursement (if any) by electronic funds transfer and in such event, LICENSOR agrees to provide to LICENSEE the LICENSOR'S bank routing information for such purpose upon request of LICENSEE. 8 Master License Agreement City of Edina l86622v4 VII. EXTENSIONS This Agreement shall be automatically extended for three (3) additional five (5) year terms (such five (5) year term is referred to as "Renewal Term") unless LICENSEE terminates this Agreement at the end of the Initial term or any Renewal Term by giving LICENSOR written notice of the intent to terminate at least three (3) months prior to the end of the then current Term. Each Supplement shall be automatically extended for three (3) additional five (S) year terms, or until the expiration or termination of this Agreement, whichever is earlier, unless LICENSEE terminates the applicable Supplement at the end of the applicable Supplement's initial term ("Supplement Initial Term") or any renewal term of the applicable Supplement ("Supplement Renewal Term") by giving LICENSOR written notice of the intent to terminate the applicable Supplement at least three (3) months prior to the end of the then current Term. The Supplement Initial Term and all Supplement Renewal Terms or the Initial Term or any Renewal Term of this Agreement shall be collectively referred to herein as the "Term." VIII. USE; GOVERNMENT AL APPROVALS LICENSEE shall use the Poles and Premises only for the Permitted Use. It is understood and agreed that LICENSEE'S license to use a Premises is contingent upon its obtaining and maintaining all of the certificates, permits and other approvals (collectively the "Governmental Approvals") that may be required by any Federal, State or other governmental authorities as well as a satisfactory structural analysis, and a radio frequency analysis as stated in this Agreement. In the event that (i) any application for such Governmental Approvals should be finally rejected; (ii) any Governmental Approval issued to LICENSEE is canceled, expires, lapses, or is otherwise withdrawn or terminated; or (iii) LICENSEE determines that such Governmental Approvals may not be obtained in a timely manner, LICENSEE shall have the right to terminate the applicable Supplement. Notice of LICENSEE'S exercise of its right to terminate shall be given to LICENSOR in accordance with the notice provisions set forth herein and shall be effective upon the later of: (a) the receipt of such notice as set forth in NOTICE section of this Agreement; (b) upon such later date as designated by LICENSEE; or (c) upon LICENSEE'S removal of the LICENSEE'S Communication Facility as required under the terms and conditions of this Agreement. All Base Rent paid to said termination date shall be retained by LICENSOR. Upon such termination, the applicable Supplement shall be of no further force or effect except to the extent of the representations, warranties and indemnities made by each Party to the other thereunder. Otherwise, the LICENSEE shall have no further obligations for the payment of Base Rent to LICENSOR for the terminated Supplement. IX. INDEMNIFICATION LICENSEE shall indemnify and hold LICENSOR harmless against any claim of liability or loss from personal injury or property damage resulting from or arising out of the use of the Poles, Property and/or the Premises by LICENSEE, its employees, contractors or agents, except to the extent such claims or damages may be due to or caused solely by the negligence or willful misconduct of LICENSOR, or its employees, contractors or agents. 9 Master License Agreement City of Edina 186622v4 X. INSURANCE a. The Parties hereby waive and release any and all rights of action for negligence against the other which may hereafter arise on account of damage to the Poles, Premises or Property, resulting from any fire, or other casualty of the kind covered by standard fire insurance policies with extended coverage, regardless of whether or not, or in what amounts, such insurance is now or hereafter carried by the Parties, or either of them. These waivers and release shall apply between the Parties and they shall also apply to any claims under or through either Party as a result of any asserted right of subrogation. All such policies of insurance obtained by either Party concerning the Premises or the Property shall waive the insurer's right of subrogation against the other Party. b. LICENSEE agrees that at its own cost and expense, it will maintain commercial general liability insurance with limits of $4,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury (including death) and $4,000,000 general aggregate. LICENSEE will provide Certificates of Insurance evidencing the coverage required and including LICENSOR as an additional insured as its interest may appear under this Agreement. The insurance policies shall be issued by a company (rated A:VII or better by Best Insurance Guide) licensed, authorized or permitted to do business in the State of Minnesota. The policies shall be primary and noncontributory. c. LICENSEE shall maintain worker's compensation insurance in compliance with the statutory requirements of the State of Minnesota and Employer's Liability with a limit of $1,000,000 each accident/disease/policy limit and shall provide for waiver or subrogation by the insurance company. XI. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY LICENSOR shall be not be liable to the LICENSEE, or any of its respective agents, representatives, employees for any lost revenue, lost profits, loss of technology, rights or services, incidental, punitive, indirect, special or consequential damages, loss of data, or interruption or loss of use of service, even if advised of the possibility of such damages, whether under theory of contract, tort (including negligence), strict liability or otherwise. XII. ANNUALTERMINATION Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, provided LICENSEE is not in default hereunder beyond any applicable notice and cure periods, LICENSEE shall have the right to terminate each Supplement upon the annual anniversary of the Commencement Date of said Supplement provided that LICENSEE gives LICENSOR three (3) months prior written notice. XIII. INTERFERENCE a. LICENSEE shall obtain and provide LICENSOR, at LICENSEE'S sole cost and expense, a radio frequency interference study (RF Report") carried out by an independent professional radio frequency engineer ("LICENSEE'S RF Engineer") showing that the use of LICENSEE'S proposed "radio frequency," as shown on any Application, will not interfere with any existing, licensed communications facilities on the Premises, or LICENSOR'S licensed and unlicensed communications facilities ("LICENSOR'S Communication System"). The LICENSEE'S RF Engineer shall provide the applicable RF Report to LICENSOR on or before thirty (30) days of the applicable Application. The RF Report is 10 Master License Agreement City of Edina 186622v4 only required for the first Application made pursuant to this Agreement unless LICENSOR requests an updated report for additional frequencies as provided in part (d) below. b. LICENSEE shall provide LICENSOR with a radiation study of LICENSEE'S proposed Communication Facility equipment, to be used in any of the LICENSEE'S Communication Facilities, showing that there is no risk or danger to the general public from LICENSEE'S proposed Communication Facility equipment (Radiation Report"). LICENSOR may have the Radiation Report reviewed by LICENSOR'S radiation engineer (Radiation Engineer") to determine if there is a risk or danger to the general public from LICENSEE'S Communication Facility. If there is a danger to the public from LICENSEE'S proposed Communication Equipment, LICENSEE shall not use said equipment in any of LICENSEE'S Communication Facilities. LICENSEE shall be responsible for all cost relating to the Radiation Report and the review of the Radiation Report by LICENSOR'S Radiation Engineer. This study is only required for the first Application made pursuant to this Agreement. c. LICENSEE shall implement all measures at the transmission site required by FCC regulations, including but not limited to posting signs and markings. LICENSOR shall cooperate with and permit LICENSEE to implement all reasonable measures in order for LICENSEE to fulfill its FCC obligations. LICENSOR agrees that in the event any future party causes an applicable Premises to exceed FCC Radio Frequency radiation limits, as measured on the Premises, LICENSOR shall hold such future party liable for all such later-arising non-compliance. d. LICENSEE agrees to install LICENSEE'S Communication Facility, in compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and all FCC rules and regulations, and good engineering practices and according to the Plans, Application, applicable Supplement and this Agreement. LICENSEE further agrees that the LICENSEE'S use of the LICENSEE'S Communication Facility will not cause radio frequency interference to LICENSOR'S Communication Systems, provided such systems are lawfully installed and properly operated. In the event of interference with LICENSOR'S Communication Systems, LICENSEE shall, within twenty-four (24) hours after LICENSEE'S receipt of notice of such interference from LICENSOR, as provided in this Section, eliminate the interference or cease using LICENSEE'S interfering equipment, except for short tests necessary for the elimination of the interference, until the interference is cured to the reasonable satisfaction of the LICENSOR. If LICENSEE, in the event of interference with LICENSOR'S Communication Systems, fails to correct the interference within twenty-four (24) hours or cease using the interfering equipment within said time, except for testing purposes, or demonstrate that the LICENSEE'S Communication Facility is not the cause of the interference, LICENSOR shall have the right to disconnect the power to the LICENSEE'S Communication Facility if LICENSEE fails to cease operation of LICENSEE'S Communication Facility or provide LICENSOR with evidence that LICENSEE'S Communication Facility is not the cause of the interference. It is further agreed that LICENSOR does not guarantee to LICENSEE non-interference to the operation of LICENSEE'S Communication Facility by LICENSOR'S Communication Systems or other current users of the Premise or the Property (if any). LICENSOR will use its best efforts to notify other users of the Premises or Property of the interference, and to coordinate elimination of interference among the LICENSEE and other users of the Premises or Property. The patties agree that such reasonable evidence of interference that is likely caused by LICENSEE'S use or operation of LICENSEE'S Communication Facility warrants an emergency response 11 Master License Agreement City of Edina 186622v4 and the Notices provision in this Agreement shall not apply. Rather, LICENSOR shall provide LICENSEE reasonable evidence that the interference is likely caused by the LICENSEE'S use or operation of LICENSEE'S Communication Facility verbally by telephone to LICENSEE'S Network Operations Center at (800) 224-6620. Upon LICENSOR providing LICENSEE notice of reasonable evidence that any interference is likely caused by LICENSEE'S use or operation of LICENSEE'S Communication Facility, LICENSEE shall send a qualified technician or representative to the Premises within eight (8) hours from the time that the notice of reasonable evidence is provided by LICENSOR. The required eight (8) hour emergency response time under these circumstances is applicable 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The qualified technician or representative shall be capable of assessing the situation and eliciting the necessary response, including any repairs, alterations or modifications to LICENSEE'S Communication Facility. Prior to adding and/or modifying LICENSEE'S frequencies on a Pole or the Premises, as permitted under this Agreement, LICENSEE agrees to notify the LICENSOR of the modified frequencies so that the LICENSOR can determine whether or not the modified frequencies will cause radio interference to LICENSOR'S Communication Systems or other licensees and/or occupants on the applicable Pole or Premises. Upon request of LICENSOR, LICENSEE shall, at LICENSEE'S cost and expense, provide LICENSOR with an interference study showing that there is not any interference with LICENSOR'S Communication Systems as a result of the modification of the frequencies. The LICENSOR, in its sole discretion, shall retain the right provided herein to submit the interference study results to LICENSOR'S RF Engineer for review. If the LICENSEE fails to perform an interference study requested by LICENSOR and submit the results to the LICENSOR, the LICENSOR may have an interference study performed and the LICENSEE shall pay the LICENSOR of the cost of said interference study. XIV. REMOVAL AT END OF TERM LICENSEE shall, prior to the expiration of the applicable Term, or within ninety (90) days after any earlier termination of a Supplement, remove LICENSEE'S Communication Facility, conduits, fixtures and all personal property and restore the applicable Pole and Premises to its original condition, reasonable wear and tear excepted. LICENSOR agrees and acknowledges that all of LICENSEE'S Communication Facility, conduits, fixtures and personal property of LICENSEE shall remain the personal property of LICENSEE and LICENSEE shall have the right to remove the same at any time during the Term. All Poles, conduit and pole boxes are and shall remain property of LICENSOR. If LICENSEE fails to remove LICENSEE'S Communication Facility from the applicable Premises, LICENSEE shall pay rent at twice the then existing monthly rate or the existing monthly pro-rata basis if based upon a longer payment term, until such time as the removal of LICENSEE'S Communication Facility, fixtures and all other personal property are completed. Within sixty (60) days of the full execution of this Agreement, LICENSEE shall at its cost and expense, deliver to LICENSOR a cash security deposit ("Security Deposit") in favor of LICENSOR in the amount of Five Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($5,000.00) to secure LICENSEE'S obligation to remove the LICENSEE'S Communication Facilities according to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event LICENSEE fails to remove the LICENSEE'S Communication Facilities and restore the Property, reasonable wear and tear and casualty damage excepted, LICENSOR may do so and LICENSEE shall reimburse LICENSOR for all costs incurred by LICENSOR in removing the 12 Master License Agreement City of Edina 186622v4 LICENSEE'S Communication Facility and restoring the Property. LICENSOR may draw upon the Security Deposit in an amount that will reimburse LICENSOR for its actual costs to remove any of LICENSEE'S Communication Facilities and any amount remaining of the Security Deposit after the removal of LICENSEE'S Communication Facility by the LICENSOR will be refunded to LICENSEE. If the Security Deposit is insufficient to cover LICENSOR'S cost of removing any of LICENSEE'S Communication Facilities, LICENSEE shall pay to LICENSOR the deficiency within thirty (30) days of written notice of the amount of the deficiency. XV. NO REPRESENTATION OR WARRANTY-CONDITIONAL GRANT LICENSOR makes no representation or warranty regarding the condition of its title to the Property or its right to grant to LICENSEE use or occupation thereof under this Agreement. The license granted herein is "as is" and "where is." LICENSEE is entering into this Agreement and LICENSEE'S use of a Pole, Premises or a Property is subject to LICENSEE'S own investigation and acceptance. LICENSEE'S rights granted pursuant to this Agreement are subject and subordinate to all limitations, restrictions, and encumbrances relating to LICENSOR'S interest in the Property that may affect or limit LICENSOR'S right to grant those rights to LICENSEE. XVI. ASSIGNMENT/SUBLETTING This Agreement and each Supplement may not be sold, assigned or transferred without the express written consent of LICENSOR except that this Agreement and each Supplement under it may be sold, assigned or transferred by the LICENSEE without any approval or consent of the LICENSOR to the LICENSEE'S principal, affiliates, subsidiaries of its principal or to any entity which acquires all or substantially all of LICENSEE'S assets in the market defined by the FCC in which the Property is located by reason of a merger, acquisition or other business reorganization. No change of stock ownership, partnership interest, or, control of LICENSEE shall constitute an assignment hereunder. . LICENSEE shall provide written notice of all proposed sales, assignments or transfers within 60 days of the proposed sale, assignment or transfer. In the event LICENSOR approves any sale, assignment or transfer, LICENSEE shall not be relieved of any of its obligations under this Agreement or any of the Supplements whose term has not expired or otherwise terminated at the time of such sale, assignment or transfer. The LICENSEE may not sublet any space on a Pole or allow any other party to collocate on any Pole without the express written consent of LICENSOR. XVII. NOTICES All notices hereunder must be in writing and shall be deemed validly given if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested or by commercial courier, provided the courier's regular business is delivery service and provided further that it guarantees delivery to the addressee by the end of the next business day following the courier's receipt from the sender, addressed as follows (or any other address that the Party to be notified may have designated to the sender by like notice): LICENSOR: City of Edina Attn: Facility Manager 4801 West 50 Street Edina, MN 55424 13 Master License Agreement City of Edina 186622v4 LICENSEE: Verizon Wireless (VA W) LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless 180 Washington Valley Road Bedminster, NJ 07921 Attention: Network Real Estate Notice shall be effective upon actual receipt or refusal as shown on the receipt obtained pursuant to the foregoing. XVIII. DEFAULT In the event there is a breach by a Party with respect to any of the provisions of this Agreement or any Supplement or its obligations hereunder, the non-breaching Party shall give the breaching Party written notice of such breach. After receipt of such written notice, the breaching Party shall have thirty (30) days in which to cure any breach, provided the breaching Party shall have such extended period as may be required beyond the thirty (30) days if the breaching Party commences the cure within the thirty (30) day period and thereafter continuously and diligently pursues the cure to completion. A Party's failure to cure a breach within the time period set forth herein shall constitute a "Default". XIX. REMEDIES In the event of a Default by either Party, without limiting the non-defaulting Party in the exercise of any right or remedy which the non-defaulting Party may have by reason of such Default, the non-defaulting Party may terminate this Agreement and/or the applicable Supplement and/or may pursue any remedy now or hereafter available to the non-defaulting Party under the Laws or judicial decisions of the State of Minnesota provided, however, that LICENSEE'S sole remedy for LICENSOR's Default other than specific performance or obtaining a temporary or permanent injunction is to terminate this Agreement or any Supplement and remove the applicable LICENSEE'S Communication Facility pursuant to the terms hereof. The LICENSOR acknowledges and agrees that it is still responsible for claims or damages to the extent caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of LICENSOR, or its employees; contractors or agents. Further, upon a Default, LICENSOR may at its option (but without obligation to do so), perform LICENSEE'S duty or obligation on LICENSEE'S behalf, including but not limited to the obtaining of reasonably required insurance policies. The costs and expenses of any such performance by LICENSOR shall be due and payable by LICENSEE upon invoice therefor. XX. CASUALTY In the event of damage by fire or other casualty to the Pole or Premises that cannot reasonably be expected to be repaired within forty-five (45) days following same or which LICENSOR elects not to repair, or if the Pole or Property is damaged by fire or other casualty so that such damage may reasonably be expected to disrupt LICENSEE'S operations at the Premises for more than forty- five (45) days, then LICENSEE may, at any time following such fire or other casualty, provided LICENSOR has not completed the restoration required to permit LICENSEE to resume its operation at the Premises, terminate the Supplement upon fifteen (15) days prior written notice to LICENSOR. Any such notice of termination shall cause the Supplement to expire with the same force and effect as though the date set forth in such notice were the date originally set as the expiration date of the Supplement. The rent shall abate during the 14 Master License Agreement City of Edina 186622v4 period of repair following such fire or other casualty in proportion to the degree to which LICENSEE'S use of the Premises is impaired. XXII. APPLICABLE LAWS, RULES AND REGULATIONS LICENSEE shall, at LICENSEE'S sole cost and expense, comply with (a) all ordinances, rules, laws and statutes of all applicable governmental agencies including, but not limited to, the LICENSOR'S, to the extent that they relate to LICENSEE'S use of a Pole and/or Premises; (b) all building codes due to the installation of LICENSEE'S Communication Facility being made by LICENSEE to a Pole and/or Premises; and (c) all Permits. XXII. CONDEMNATION If the whole or any part of the Property shall be taken by any public authority under the power of eminent domain, or is sold to any entity having the power of eminent domain under threat of condemnation, then the term of this Agreement or the applicable Supplements shall cease as of the date of the granting of the petition or the date of the closing. All rentals paid to said termination date shall be retained by LICENSOR. Any award, compensation, or damages, shall be paid to and be the sole property of LICENSOR, but nothing herein shall preclude LICENSEE from claiming against the condemning authority with respect to moving expenses and loss of personal property, and receiving an award therefor. XXIII. DATA PRACTICES This Agreement and the Supplements are subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practice Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13 (Data Practices Act). All government data, as defined in the Data Practices Act Section 13.02, Subd 7, which is created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by LICENSEE in performing any of the functions of the LICENSOR during performance of this Agreement or a Supplement is subject to the requirements of the Data Practice Act and LICENSEE shall comply with those requirements as if it were a government entity. XXIV. ADDITIONAL TERMS Notwithstanding any other term, covenant or condition of this Agreement, LICENSEE agrees that within twelve (12) months of the date that LICENSOR executes the first Supplement under this Agreement, that LICENSEE will complete a study to determine where there are "dead zones" in the area of the LICENSOR, hereinafter referred to as the "Highlands Area", as shown on the map attached hereto as Exhibit D" (Highlands Map"), and submit said study to the LICENSOR and LICENSEE further agrees that, within eighteen (18) month period, LICENSEE will install the necessary communication equipment of LICENSEE within the Highlands Area such that there are not any "dead zones" therein. If LICENSEE fails to install the necessary communication equipment within the Highlands Area within eighteen (18) month period, the LICENSOR shall not be required to grant LICENSEE any more ROW Permits, or execute any more Supplements under the terms of this Agreement. XXV. MISCELLANEOUS 15 Master License Agreement City of Edina 186622v4 a. Approval of Supplement. Each Supplement to this Agreement shall be executed by the Mayor and the City Manager after the LICENSEE has complied with all of the terms, covenants and conditions of this Agreement and the applicable Application has been approved. b. Authority. Each of the Parties hereto warrants to the other that the person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of that Party has the full right, power and authority to enter into and execute this Agreement on that Party's behalf and that no consent from any other person or entity- is necessary as a condition precedent to the legal effect of this Agreement. c. Complete Agreement; Amendments. This Agreement supersedes all prior discussions and negotiations and contains all agreements and understandings between the LICENSOR and the LICENSEE. This Agreement may only be amended in writing signed by all Parties. All Exhibits are incorporated into this Agreement by reference. d. Binding Effect. The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall run with the Premises and Property, inure to the benefit of and be binding on the respective Parties and their respective successors and permitted assignees. e. Enforcement and Attorneys' Fees. The prevailing Party in any action or proceeding in court to enforce the terms of this Agreement including any appeals shall be entitled to receive its reasonable attorney's fees and other reasonable costs and expenses from the non-prevailing party. f. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. g. Severability. If any term of this Agreement is found to be void or invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the remaining terms of this Agreement, which shall continue in full force and effect. h. Estoppel Information. Each Party shall from time to time, within sixty (60) days after written request from the other Party, execute, acknowledge and deliver an estoppel certificate indicating that this Agreement and any amendments thereto are in full force and effect, setting out the current monthly rental amount, date rent is paid through, expiration date of the then current term, and acknowledging that there are not, to such Party's knowledge, any uncured defaults, or specifying such defaults, if any, are claimed. i. Brokers. If either Party is represented by a real estate broker in this transaction, that Party shall be fully responsible for any fee due such broker in this transaction, and shall hold the other Party harmless from any claims for commission by such broker. j. No Waiver. No provision of this Agreement will be deemed waived by either Party unless expressly waived in writing by the waiving Party. No waiver shall be implied by delay or any other act or omission of either Patty. No waiver by either Party of any provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed a waiver of such provision with respect to any subsequent matter relating to such provision. k. Recitals. The Recitals set forth above in this Agreement are hereby incorporated in this Agreement as though they were set forth in the body hereof. [Remainder of Page Intentionally Blank-Signatures on Following Page] 16 Master License Agreement City of Edina 186622v4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have set their hands and affixed their respective seals the day and year first above written. LICENSOR:,] City of Edina,,,Jipesota . /'/ -- By:. 3 == James Hovland Title: Mayor Date: [/oo lob wlwel®.l ea»» "%% &r %4 ott ea! Title: City Manager LICENSEE: Verizon Wireless (VA W) LLC ant verio Wireless / / » / llcn Name: Z James R. Martin Title: Director.-Network Field Engineering Date: //-9/-/( 7 <: 17 Master License Agreement City of Edina 1 86622v4 EXHIBIT "A" LICENSE SUPPLEMENT 1. This Supplement ("this Supplement") is made this day of , 2016 between the City of Edina, Minnesota, with its principal offices located at 4801 West 50 Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424 ("LICENSOR"), and Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC, d/b/a Verizon Wireless, whose principal place of business is One Verizon Way, Mail Stop 4AW100, Basking Ridge, New Jersey 07920 ("LICENSEE"). 2. Master License Agreement. This Supplement is a Supplement as referenced in that certain Master License Agreement between LICENSOR and LICENSEE, dated the day of ,2016, (the "Agreement"). The LICENSOR and LICENSEE agreed that all of the terms, covenants and conditions of the Agreement are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof without the necessity of repeating or attaching the Agreement and are in full force and effect except as they may be modified by this Supplement. In the event of a conflict, contradiction, modification or inconsistency between any term of the Agreement and this Supplement, the terms of this Supplement shall govern. Capitalized terms used in this Supplement shall have the same meaning described for them in the Agreement unless otherwise indicated herein. 3. Premises. The Property owned by LICENSOR is located at _, Edina, Minnesota 55424 the Premises licensed by the LICENSOR to the LICENSEE hereunder is described on Exhibit "l" attached hereto and made a part hereof. 4. Term. The Commencement Date and the Term of this Supplement shall be as set forth in the Agreement. 5. Consideration. The annual Base Rent for the first year of this Supplement shall be One Thousand Five Hundred and Noll 00 Dollars ($1,500.00) and shall be payable as set forth in the Agreement. [Insert one of the following: "LICENSEE shall furnish and install an electrical meter for the measurement of electrical power used by LICENSEE'S installation." Or, if an electrical meter is not installed: "LICENSOR shall be paid $1,500.00 per year, as and for Electrical Service Reimbursement, as provided in the Agreement." 6. Site Specific Terms. (Include any site-specific terms) Any Replacement Pole and/or New Pole installed by LICENSEE pursuant to the Plans at the location shown on Exhibit 1 attached hereto upon completion of the installation of the Pole shall be conveyed to LICENSOR without consideration to or from LICENSOR pursuant to a Bill of Sale. LICENSOR will thereafter be responsible for the Pole as provided in the Agreement. LICENSEE shall at LICENSEE'S sole cost and expense, remove, dispose and/or discard any Pole that LICENSEE removed and installed a Replacement Pole in place thereof. 18 Master License Agreement City of Edina 186622v4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have set their hands and affixed their respective seal the day and year first above written. LICENSOR: City of Edina By: [EXHIBIT ONLY - NOT FOR EXECUTION] James Hovland Title: Mayor Date: -------------- AND By: [EXHIBIT ONLY - NOT FOR EXECUTION] Scott Neal Title: City Manager Date: _ LICENSEE: Verizon Wireless (VA W) LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless By: [EXHIBIT ONLY - NOT FOR EXECUTION] Name: ------------ Title: ---------- Date: _ 19 Master License Agreement City of Edina 186622v4 EXHIBIT 1 Premises (Include Map, Pole Diagram, Plans and Table Listing All Pole Locations) 20 Master License Agreement City of Edina 186622v4 EXHIBIT B" LICENSE SUPPLEMENT APPLICATION FOR CITY REVIEW UNDER AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY AND VERIZON DATED THE __ DAY OF ' 2016 ("AGREEMENT") 1. Attach one (1) set of detailed construction plans and specifications ("Plans") and one (1) completed engineering grade plan sheets for each site ("Grade Plans") signed by a Minnesota Licensed Engineer and one electronic copy of each. 2. Attach the application fee of $0.00; checks payable to the City. 3. Attach copy of permission from a Pole owner if any Pole is owned by an agency or party other than the City. 4. If Plans and Grading Plans are approved by City, one (1) set of each with City comments will be returned (emailed) to the Applicant. 5. Submit a check in the amount of $0.00, to be held in escrow by the City, to be used by the City to pay all Administrative Fees incurred by the City under the terms of the Agreement, the balance, if any, to be returned upon construction completion and delivery of completed as-builts in AutoCAD format to the City. The following items must be checked and on file prior to Application being considered complete for review. □Master License Agreement (if applicable) Applicants Name: _ Email Address: _ Company Name: _ □Performance Bond Phone Number: _ Fax Number: _ Phone Number Fax Number: _ Billing Address:, City: _ Company Job/ID [][[[[\[)@[» State: Zip: LOCATION:, _ DESCRIPTION OF WORK:, _ FREQUENCIES: _ FREQUENCY REPORT: _ STRUCTURAL REPORT: _ CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE: Start Date: Number of Construction Days During Schedule. Completion Date: _ By signing this application, I (the applicant/company) hereby acknowledge that I must adhere to all provisions of the City Ordinance Seo. and any other applicable ordinances. The applicant shall also comply with the regulations of all other governmental agencies for the protection of the public. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE: DATE: _ For Office Use: Plan Meeting Date. Agenda Item Number Approved Plan Number: _ Application Received: Decision Deadline: Date Stamp: 21 Master License Agreement City of Edina 186622v4 EXHIBIT C" BILL OF SALE FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless ("Seller") sells and conveys to the City of Edina, Minnesota ("Buyer"), the following personal property: one (1) pole except any of Seller's communications equipment affixed thereto (the "Personal Property") located in the public right-of-way of in the City of Edina, State of Minnesota as described in License Supplement between the Buyer and Seller dated the day of _ 2016. SELLER MAKES NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE PERSONAL PROPERTY'S MERCHANT ABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE. BY ITS ACCEPTANCE OF THIS BILL OF SALE, BUYER ACKNOWLEDGES THAT IT HAS FULLY INSPECTED THE PERSONAL PROPERTY AND BUYER ACCEPTS THE SAME. This Bill of Sale merely conveys to Buyer all right, title and interest, if any, of Seller in the Personal Property, but this shall not convey any of the communications equipment or appurtenances of Seller that are installed, attached, mounted or otherwise connected to the Personal Property. This Bill of Sale contains the entire agreement and representations of the patties related to the sale of the Personal Property, may not be altered except by a written instrument signed by both parties, and shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. SELLER: Verizon Wireless (VA W) LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless By: _ Name: --------- Title: ---------- Date: ---------- 22 Master License Agreement City of Edina 1 86622v4 EXHIBIT D" »" \ r], E 4-'i" / saa . " H _e1ghborhood ightands ' gs /..' • Z $ P « ! - 3 23 Master License A City of Edina greement 186622v4 Protecting Health and Safety The health and safety of consumers is the wireless industry's first priority. Here's what you should know about radiofrequency (RF) energy and wireless devices. Read what the experts say: • World Health Organization • American Cancer Society • National Institutes of Health- National Cancer Institute • Federal Communications Commission (FCC) • Food and Drug Administration What is RF Energy? Many devices we use every day--baby monitors, Wi-Fi routers, and garage door openers--transmit information using radio waves. These radio waves emit energy commonly referred to as RF energy. Experts agree that wireless devices have not been shown to pose a public health risk. Overwhelming scientific evidence shows no known health risk to humans from RF energy emitted by wireless devices, including smartphones. This evidence includes numerous, independent analyses of peer-reviewed studies conducted over several decades by national and international organizations. Federal government statistics show the number of brain tumors has remained unchanged since mobile phones were widely introduced in the 1980s while the number of mobile phones and sites has increased significantly, by a factor of 325 and 140, respectively. Cellular equipment operates within safety limits. RF energy from antennas used in cellular transmissions, including 5G small cells, result in exposure levels well below FCC safety limits. These limits are based on recommendations from the scientific community and expert non-government organizations. The widely accepted scientific consensus is that towers, small cells, antennas, and other cellular infrastructure pose no known hazard to nearby residents-and as the FCC notes, "the possibility that a member of the general public could be exposed to RF levels in excess of the FCC guidelines is extremely remote." FCC regulations protect health and safety. All wireless devices sold in the U.S. must go through a rigorous approval process to ensure they meet the science-based guidelines set by the FCC. These guidelines-based on internationally-recognized scientific organizations-set limits for the maximum amount of RF exposure from wireless devices and include a significant margin of safety. Wireless devices and antennas operate well under FCC thresholds. ctia ••••••• EXHIBIT 1 g Everything Wireless New 5G networks emit less RF energy. Next-generation 5G devices operate on millimeter wave spectrum which, after decades of studies, is subject to the same FCC regulatory regime described above. Because of the nature of millimeter wave spectrum, 5G devices operate at the same or lower RF levels than today's 4G networks. Typical exposure to 5G infrastructure-such as small cells attached to phone poles or the sides of buildings-is comparable to Bluetooth devices and baby monitors. Any hazards "would require exposure to RF energy at levels far above anything that would be possible with ordinary cellular telephone equipment." (Letter from Dr. Kenneth R. Foster to Shreveport City Council, April 28, 2018) Expert voices "Based on our ongoing evaluation of this issue and taking into account all available scientific evidence we have received, we have not found sufficient evidence that there are adverse health effects in humans caused by exposures at or under the current radiofrequency energy exposure limits. Even with frequent daily use by the vast majority of adults, we have not seen an increase in events like brain tumors." Director of the FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health (2018) "[T]he RF waves given off by cell phones don't have enough energy to damage DNA directly or to heat body tissues. Because of this, it's not clear how cell phones might be able to cause cancer" -American Cancer Society (2018) Agencies and organizations that shape U.S. regulations: • Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) • National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements • International Commission on Nonionizing Radiation Protection The FCC, as well as other agencies that are experts in health and safety issues ... looked at all of the studies and all of the information and they have reached the determination that these are safe. That's a determination that is constantly undergoing review and any new information that comes up is taken into account." FCC Commissioner (2018) "We have relied on decades of research and hundreds of studies to have the most complete evaluation of radiofrequency energy exposure. This information has informed the FDA's assessment of this important public health issue, and given us the confidence that the current safety limits for cell phone radiofrequency energy exposure remain acceptable for protecting the public health .... [T]he totality of the available scientific evidence continues to not support adverse health effects in humans caused by exposures at or under the current radiofrequency energy exposure limits." Director of the FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health (2018) "The argument that cell phones cause cancer lacks biological plausibility because the energy contained in the waves is too low to cause damage." Clinical Physicist, Memorial Sloan Kettering (2019) More information is available at wirelesshealthfacts.com. 1400 16th Street, NW #600 Washington, DC 20036 202 736.3200 www.ctia.org ctia ••••••• Experts - Wireless Health Facts ••••••• Page 1 of 14 What the expert community tells us {» ~ ~ ~ ®2 <= World Health Organization American Cancer " society i6 EXHIBIT 3 c National Institutes of Health https://www.wirelesshealthfacts.com/experts/ 5/20/2020 Experts - Wireless Health Facts Page 2 of 14 Ii U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. European Commission FORTE: [cNIREi» NON-IONIZING RADIATION PROTECTION II+Il Government of Canada .·}es, ±ti mo mg GOV.UK Norwegian Institute of Public Health Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare ~ arpansa https://www.wirelesshealthfacts.com/experts/ 5/20/2020 Experts - Wireless Health Facts Page 3 of 14 Federal Communications Commission "As discussed above, radiofrequency emissions from antennas used for cellular and PCS transmissions result in exposure levels on the ground that are typically thousands of times below safety limits. These safety limits were adopted by the FCC based on the recommendations of expert organizations and endorsed by agencies of the Federal Government responsible for health and safety. Therefore, there is no reason to believe that such towers could constitute a potential health hazard to nearby residents or students." Learn more. Back to top https://www.wirelesshealthfacts.com/experts/ 5/20/2020 Experts - Wireless Health Facts Page 4 of 14 Worl Health Organization World Health Organization "Recent surveys have indicated that RF exposures from base stations and wireless technologies in publicly accessible areas (including schools and hospitals) are normally thousands of times below international standards ... From all evidence accumulated so far, no adverse short- or long-term health effects have been shown to occur from the RF signals produced by base stations." Learn more. https://www.wirelesshealthfacts.com/experts/ 5/20/2020 Experts - Wireless Health Facts " ... there is no convincing scientific evidence that the weak RF signals from base stations [cell towers] and wireless networks cause adverse health effects." Learn more. Back to top Page 5 of 14 American Cancer " society 6 American Cancer Society "At ground level near typical cellular base stations, the amount of RF energy is thousands of times less than the limits for safe exposure set by the US Federal Communication Commission (FCC) and other regulatory authorities ... Some people have expressed concern that living, working, or going to school near a cell phone tower might increase the risk of cancer or other health problems. At this time, there is very little evidence to support this idea." Learn more. https ://www. wirelessheal thfacts. com/ experts/ 5/20/2020 Experts - Wireless Health Facts Page 6 of 14 "The incidence of brain tumors in human beings has been flat for the last 40 years ... That is the absolute most important scientific fact." -Dr. Otis Brawley, chief medical officer of the American Cancer Society. Learn more. Back to top National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute " ... although many studies have examined the potential health effects of non-ionizing radiation from radar, microwave ovens, cell phones, and other sources, there is currently no consistent evidence that non- ionizing radiation increases cancer risk in humans." Learn more. https :/ /www. wirelessheal th facts .com/ experts/ 5/20/2020 Experts - Wireless Health Facts "No consistent evidence for an association between any source of non- ionizing EMF and cancer has been found." Learn more. Page 7 of 14 Back to top U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION The Food and Drug Administration "Based on our ongoing evaluation of this issue, the totality of the available scientific evidence continues to not support adverse health effects in humans caused by exposures at or under the current radiofrequency energy exposure limits." Learn more. Back to top https ://www. wirelessheal thfacts. com/ experts/ 5/20/2020 Experts - Wireless Health Facts Page 9 of 14 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center '"Any individual study might find something unusual,' Dr. Dauer says. 'But what's most important to consider is the weight of evidence across all of them.' And that, he says, does not show any clear link between cell phones and cancer ... The argument that cell phones cause cancer lacks biological plausibility because the energy contained in the waves is too low to cause damage." Learn more. Back to top Government of Canada Government of Canada " ... the vast majority of scientific research to date does not support a link between RF energy exposure and human cancers ... With respect to cell phone towers, as long as exposures respect the limits set in Health https://www.wirelesshealthfacts.com/experts/ 5/20/2020 Experts - Wireless Health Facts Page 10 of 14 Canada's guidelines, there is no scientific reason to consider cell phone towers dangerous to the public." Learn more. Back to top European Commission European Commission: Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR) "Overall, the epidemiological studies on mobile phone RF EMF exposure do not show an increased risk of brain tumours. Furthermore, they do not indicate an increased risk for other cancers of the head and neck region." Learn more. Back to top https://www.wirelesshealthfacts.com/experts/ 5/20/2020 Experts - Wireless Health Facts Page 11 of 14 GOV.UK United Kingdom Health Protection Agency Independent Advisory Group on Non-Ionizing Radiation (HPA) "In summary, although a substantial amount of research has been conducted in this area, there is no convincing evidence that RF field exposure below guideline levels causes health effects in adults or children." Learn more. Back to top FORTE: Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research "Extensive research for more than a decade has not detected anything new regarding interaction mechanisms between radiofrequency fields https://www.wirelesshealthfacts.com/experts/ 5/20/2020 Experts - Wireless Health Facts Page 12 of 14 and the human body and has found no evidence for health risks below current exposure guidelines." Learn more. Back to top Norwegian Institute of Public Health Norwegian Institute for Public Health "The studies have been performed on cells and tissues, and in animals and humans. The effects that have been studied apply to changes in organ systems, functions and other effects. There are also a large number of population studies with an emphasis on studies of cancer risk. The large total number of studies provides no evidence that exposure to weak RF fields causes adverse health effects." Learn more. Back to top https://www.wirelesshealthfacts.com/experts/ 5/20/2020 Experts - Wireless Health Facts Page 13 of 14 ®» arpansa Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency "Current research indicates that there is no established evidence for health effects from radio waves used in mobile telecommunications. This includes the upcoming roll-out of the SG network. ARPANSA's assessment is that SG is safe." Learn more. Back to top https ://www.wirelesshealthfacts.com/experts/ 5/20/2020 1 Liz Olson From:Cindy Anderson Sent:Saturday, April 25, 2020 7:08 PM To:Sharon Allison Subject:New cell tower at Highlands Park EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good Evening, I reside at 5201 Doncaster Way the residential property that is the first lot south of the park land by the Highlands skating rink. Unfortunately I did not "attend" the virtual meeting last week. I did watch the taping of it and have voiced some concerns. I would like to see if it is possible to consider locating this tower further away from my property line and the warming house. Besides the "unsightliness" of the proposed tower...it seems as though no one can address the question about any possible health concerns. I am wondering if there is any possibility to discuss this further with anyone to see if there is a more agreeable solution. Thank you for your consideration. Cindy Anderson 1 Liz Olson From:Lori Mertes Sent:Saturday, April 25, 2020 7:50 PM To:Sharon Allison Subject:Appeal Decision on the 170.1 foot setback variance for a monopole cellular telecommunication antenna tower and light EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Sharon, We would like to appeal the Planning Commissions decision from April 15th regarding the 170.1 foot setback variance for the monopole cellular telecommunication antenna tower and light. As residents at 5209 Doncaster Way, we received notification of the public hearing on Wednesday, April 15 regarding the request for the 170.1 foot setback variance for the monopole cellular telecommunication antenna tower located at 5200 Doncaster Way. Unfortunately, we set the notice aside and did not call in, but we did watch the replay of the meeting. We have several concerns. There was discussion regarding potential 5G millimeter-wave radiation emitting from the new tower, it seemed like this was dismissed and the building permit was approved. As the tower rises above the hockey and skating rinks and is next to the warming house, which also hosts summer youth programs, it seems like this absolutely should be looked into prior to the installation. The new tower will be taller than the old tower creating even more of a visual eyesore. Plus there is that annoying buzz from the old tower. Will that continue with the new tower? Will the buzz be louder and more frequent? Recognizing that improved cell service is important to our neighborhood, we ask that the City of Edina look at relocating the tower from the southeast corner or the hockey rink to the northwest corner, a distance of approximately 210 feet. As a result, the City will no longer need a variance, the new tower will not be next to the warming house and the buzzing will be 210 feet further away and less noticeable. 2 Is there an opportunity to discuss these concerns? What are our next steps? Lori and Jack Mertes 1 Liz Olson From:Tom and Sarah (Sal) HUSSIAN Sent:Saturday, April 25, 2020 8:58 PM To:Sharon Allison Subject:Regarding Cell tower at 5200 Doncaster EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Ms. Allison, I live at 5213 Doncaster Way and am writing with regards to concerns about the new cell tower that is to be erected adjacent to the Highlands Park hockey rink. The proposed tower will be an eye sore and is very close to the warming house and rink. We would like to propose that the tower be situated to the north end to move it away from the warming house and the rink. I would encourage the city to look at the site and reconsider the positioning of the tower. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I apologize for not speaking up previously. Sarah and Tom Hussian 5213 Doncaster Way Edina, MN 55436 1 Liz Olson From:Kristen Zwieg Sent:Saturday, April 25, 2020 10:15 PM To:Sharon Allison Subject:Cell Tower in Highlands EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Sharon, I live in the Highlands neighborhood and have become aware of the proposed replacement of the cell phone tower by the Highlands warming house. I am writing to appeal the variance that was approved last week by the planning commission. I don't believe adequate research has been done regarding the potential health effects of the 5G technology. The increased size of the proposed pole will be an eye sore in our neighborhood. I understand the interest in improving Verizon's service in our city but think there are options for locations that are not so close to residential properties and not so directly above an area where children and adults of our community congregate. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Kristen Zwieg 5232 Lochloy Drive, Edina City of Edina Correspondence Submission If you are leaving comments for a public hearing being heard by Council or the Planning Commission, go to https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/public-hearings Correspondence Selection * Data Practices Advisory: Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all Board or Commission members. You are not required to complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name, street address or your email address, your comments will not be sent to the Board or Commission members. Open Meeting Law Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Members cannot engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You might also receive a response from a City staff member. Name * Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Comments * File Upload By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above. Planning Commission Kelley Lange 5301 Mirror Lakes dr no dashes or spaces kelley@usinternet.com I strongly oppose the proposed 75 foot tower at Highlands Park. 1. It’s height will greatly diminish the beautiful park setting and established neighborhood. 2. There is speculation whether 5G is harmful to our health and placing it in an area where kids frequent year round is a bad idea. Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png Verizon confidential and proprietary. Unauthorized disclosure, reproduction or other use prohibited. MIN DAISY RF Justification Benefits for City of Edina 2020/05/29 1 Verizon confidential and proprietary. Unauthorized disclosure, reproduction or other use prohibited. Overview 2 MIN DAISY is being planned in the City of Edina aim to improve coverage on an important area of a residential zone as such as Highlands, Rolling Green and Hilldale, over these slides we will see its justification and benefits of deploying it. Verizon confidential and proprietary. Unauthorized disclosure, reproduction or other use prohibited.Verizon confidential and proprietary. Unauthorized disclosure, reproduction or other use prohibited.3 Coverage maps Current and planned Verizon confidential and proprietary. Unauthorized disclosure, reproduction or other use prohibited.4 Existing LTE coverage No contribution from the proposed Verizon tower Planned MIN DAISY Zoom: Verizon confidential and proprietary. Unauthorized disclosure, reproduction or other use prohibited.5 Predicted LTE coverage Including contribution from the proposed Verizon tower Planned MIN DAISY Zoom: Verizon confidential and proprietary. Unauthorized disclosure, reproduction or other use prohibited. RF Signal improvement brings better user experience and ensure emergency services can continue to function in the vicinity of the proposed tower LINK TO VIDEO https://www.verizonwireless.com/support/troubleshooting-wireless-signal-coverage-video/ 6 Factors That Impact Wireless Signal Verizon confidential and proprietary. Unauthorized disclosure, reproduction or other use prohibited.7 1 Crown Castle USA, Inc. To: City of Edina City Council From: Crown Castle Date: June 10, 2020 Re: Cell Tower Placement – 5200 Doncaster Way, Highlands Park, Edina Minnesota (“Project”) Crown Castle USA, Inc. (“Crown Castle”) respectfully submits this additional information responding to the specific questions raised by the City in connection with the above Project. City Staff Inquiry: The park site appears to offer the best opportunity for a location in the general area to provide better coverage. Staff believes this needs to be further supported by data? Crown Castle Response: Crown Castle agrees that the location of the existing monopole is the best location for the reasons previously submitted. In addition, the park site is necessary to ensure reliable cell coverage. The MIN DAISY search area encompasses dense residential development throughout the entire ring, we are targeting this particular neighborhood of Highlands Park. There are limited areas where a tower could meet adequate setback distances (four times the tower height for towers under 75 feet in height and six times the tower height for towers in excess of 75 feet) from parcel lines. The ring contains high road density (city streets) and is dissected by a major collector street: Vernon Avenue South. Due to the residential nature of the Daisy search area and limited availability of land and lack of taller buildings, one Crown Castle candidate is presented. The Park is essentially to ensure coverage. Crown Castle is not aware of any viable locations outside of the Park that will serve the community and the City. City Staff Inquiry: City Council is looking to understand why alternate location(s) are not acceptable based on engineering or other requirements The following is feedback from staff in terms of other locations discussed and considered with Crown Castle previously on the park site: 1. The city had encouraged Crown Castle to replace the other hockey light pole with a similar tower to what is existing. That idea was declined, (there would be two hockey light poles, each with an antenna on it). Crown Castle Response: This location is not feasible for trucks and other transport equipment to access the location to install and maintain the tower due to the proximity of the lake. This location is for foot traffic only. Crown Castle would have to construct an access road through the park to that location, further burdening the park by reducing the availability of additional winter skating area. 2 2. The location adjacent to the Tennis court and well house in the Highlands park area was suggested by the former Park and Rec Director. Crown declined that suggestion given reception in that area. Crown Castle Response: The tennis courts and well house area was not considered due the proximity of residential houses and meeting setbacks. This location directly impacts more residents than the current proposed location. In addition, it was decided that the best option would be to keep one tower in this area. If the tower was moved to the tennis courts, there would be two separate towers within one mile of each other instead of one tower that will be able to hold Verizon, T- Mobile and future carriers. Furthermore, adding an additional tower would be inconsistent with the City’s co-location requirements. As the aerial photo of the tennis court and adjacent neighborhood below indicates, the tower would have more of an impact on that neighborhood as it would encroach on several residential properties instead of just one. The tennis court location would similarly require a variance and have far greater impact on the community. 3. The opposite side of Rink at Highlands was suggested, however, Crown said road access and proximity to the water was a negative. Crown Castle Response: This location is not feasible for trucks and other transport equipment to access the location to install and maintain the tower due to the proximity of the lake. Crown Castle would need to construct an access road through the park, further burdening the park by reducing the availability of additional winter skating area. City Staff Inquiry: The application ended back at the existing tower location which was chosen by Verizon in part because it was existing and would be more economical to use versus building in an entirely new site. • This location is best agreed upon to provide the coverage objectives of the city. The below map depicts the coverage contribution just of the planned site; the new site will serve most of the areas of Highlands Park, as seen below for this specific planned site. A coverage map is a graphic representation in colors of predicted received signal from the transmission tower, indoor levels represented in red predicts in those geographic areas whether users can be able to experience a reliable service inside most of the standard structures (houses, buildings, cars); in green color are assessed coverage levels that guarantee a reliable performance when the user is doing calls from inside a vehicle 3 (indoor performance in standard structures might be compromised); and blue areas assess where the user can benefit from a strong connection outdoors (but indoor or in-vehicle connections might be compromised). • Each radio station is planned to cover specific areas; these areas depend on specific characteristics such as: proximity to a Verizon site location, vegetation density, topography, user equipment, and several others. Existing transmission towers are not close (more than a mile away) to the Highlands Park area and due to physics in the propagation of existing radio signals from nearby sites the intensity of the received signal is not enough to guarantee good indoor coverage which translates to a weak connection in the specific area. • The original plan was to extend the existing Crown tower and extend the icehouse for the equipment. The proposed tower extension could not be effectively engineered to meet industry standards and the existing pole diameter was too small to fit proposed cabling. Furthermore, the city’s decisionnot to expand the icehouse further detracted from the value of making this difficult modification to the existing tower work. The proposed equipment space was relocated approximately 1000 feet NE of the icehouse under the trees. Alternatively, we investigated replacing a light pole to the northwest, but it would be too close to the water and have no vehicle access. City Staff Inquiry: Staff believes Mr. Schenk answered questions about sites away from the parking area, given access concerns. There may need to be more information on why not in those areas? 4 • Parking Lot : Crown Castle Response:The proposed tower type in the parking lot was a light pole, not a monopole with lighting. A light pole would not be sufficient for this deployment. Moving the tower and compound to the parking lot would also use substantial parking spaces, and be more aesthetically intrusive. • Outside of the park : Crown Castle Response: As set forth above regarding the tennis court suggestion, each radio station is planned to cover specific areas, these areas depend on specific characteristics as: proximity to a Verizon site location, vegetation density, topography, user equipment, and several others. Existing transmission towers are not close (more than a mile away) to the Highlands Park area, and, due to physics in the propagation of existing radio signals from nearby sites, the intensity of the received signal is not enough to guarantee good indoor coverage which translates to a weak connection in the specific area. • Also, what kind of reception improvement can be expected. – As shown above in the coverage mapindoor levels represented in red predicts in those geographic areas whether users can be able to experience a reliable service inside most of the standard structures (houses, buildings, cars); in green color are assessed coverage levels that guarantee a reliable performance when the user is doing calls from inside a vehicle (but indoor performance in standard structures might be compromised) and blue areas assess where the user can benefit from a strong connection outdoors (but indoor or in-vehicle connections might be compromised) • Each radio station is planned to cover specific areas, these areas depend on specific characteristics as: proximity to a Verizon site location, vegetation density, topography, user equipment, and several others. Existing transmission towers are not close (more than 5 a mile away) to the Highlands Park area and due to physics in the propagation of existing radio signals from nearby sites the intensity of the received signal is not enough to guarantee good indoor coverage which translates to a weak connection in the specific area. In addition to the above, in order to consider other locations and start over, there will be a significant time delay. During that time the cell coverage will continue to be problematic in the Highlands Area. For the reasons set forth above, in addition to the delay, Crown Castle does not believe that alternative sites either outside the park or in the park are feasible. Finally, through staff has not requested this information, a member of the public sought information regarding the height of other cell towers in the areas with Verizon coverage. A response to this inquiry would not be helpful to the approval of the structure at issue. First, each pole is individually designed to account for topography and other location specific considerations (such as obstructions). Second, Crown Castle does not have at its disposal answers to this question. Some of the information may be publicly available, but Crown Castle does not own or operate all of the cell towers in the area. Third, this specific pole was designed to be in the park location to satisfy a underserved coverage area. Crown Castle believes that it has answered all of the questions requested and has demonstrated both the need for the variance and the logic behind the site location. City Council approval is respectfully requested. 70242138 v1 Date: June 16, 2020 Agenda Item #: IX.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Stephanie Hawkinson, Affordable Housing Development Manager Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2020-62: Calling a Public Hearing on the Proposed Conveyance of City Owned Property to the Edina Housing Foundation Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approved Resolution No. 2020-62 calling a public hearing on the proposed conveyance of City-owned property to the Edina Housing Foundation. INTRODUCTION: The cost of housing is a barrier for many people to move to Edina. The Edina Housing Foundation (“Foundation”), an independent 501(c)3 nonprofit corporation, proposes buying a vacant parcel located at Abercrombie Drive and Duggan P laza from the City of Edina for $1.00 for the purpose of creating entry level ownership opportunities for households who either want to move to Edina or transition to homeownership from rental. In order to convey the property, the City Council is required to hold a public hearing. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report: Calling a Public Hearing on the Proposed Conveyance of City Owned Property Resolution 2020-62:Calling a Public Hearing on the Proposed Conveyance of City Owned Property Site Survey June 16, 2020 Mayor and City Council Stephanie Hawkinson, Affordable Housing Development Manager Resolution No. 2020-62: Calling a Public Hearing on the Proposed Conveyance of City Owned Property to the Edina Housing Foundation Information / Background: The cost of housing is a barrier for many people to move to Edina. These people may be working in the City and contributing to the quality of residents’ lives such as lab techs, nurses or aids in the hospital, senior housing employees, day care providers, teachers and teachers’ aids, grocery store clerks, hair dressers, etc. Many of these employees are deemed essential during the pandemic, yet they cannot afford to own a home here. The cost and value of single-family ownership housing has been increasing annually since the Great Recession, with the number of affordable or entry level homes decreasing. The 2020 Maxfield Comprehensive Housing Market Analysis for the City of Edina (“Maxfield Study”) determined that there is a demand for up to 60 affordable or entry-level single-family homes. Yet, the largest barriers to developing new affordable single-family houses is the limited availability of land and the land cost. How some Cities address this, most notably Minneapolis and St. Paul, is to sell publicly owned land to affordable housing developers at a reduced cost. Edina has an opportunity to address the demand for affordable housing through the sale of a City owned parcel at Abercrombie Drive and Duggan Plaza combined with portions of the streets on either side that need to be vacated (“Property”). According to the 2020 Maxfield Study, between 2019 and 2019 the city provided 872 permits for new single-family houses. The average price of the teardown was $421,420, which were replaced with houses valued, on average, at $1,165,786. In October of 2019, the average list price of a previously occupied home was $799,000 and for a new home it was $1,462,450. The cost of housing is the context for the 2019 Quality of Life Survey, where Edina ranked lower than other Minnesota communities in the area of availability of affordable quality housing with only 32% rating this as excellent or good. Opportunity to Address Housing Demand Edina has only one lot that is appropriate and available for the development of affordable single family ownership housing. The other City own parcels are either in flood zones, have easements running through STAFF REPORT Page 2 them, have a watermain or other infrastructure, or unbuildable terrain. The Property at Duggan Plaza and Abercrombie is relatively flat, is nestled between two single family homes, with the rear of the lot at Normandale road. This Property was once a median like what is in Duggan Plaza. This is an extension of Duggan Plaza that was not formally vacated but grassed over. The lot is approximately 133 feet deep and 102.59 feet wide. The lot area is 13,618 square feet. The Property provide an opportunity to develop housing that is achievable to households with incomes at or below 120% of the Area Median Income (roughly $120,000) Edina Housing Foundation Proposal The Edina Housing Foundation (“Foundation”), an independent 501(c)3 nonprofit corporation, proposes buying the City of Edina owned median for $1.00 for the purpose of creating entry level ownership opportunities for households who either want to move to Edina or transition to homeownership from rental. Once the Foundation has site control, they would undergo the following process: • Request a vacation of the right of way on both sides of the City owned median. • Request a platting of the median with the vacated right of ways. • Submit a Request for Proposals to affordable single-family housing developers. • Select a developer with the best experience, capacity and demonstrated outcomes to fulfill to housing requirements for this Property. • Require house design to complement existing neighborhood. • Developer would hold a community meeting to gather input on proposed design. • The house will be sold to an income qualified homeowner: 80% to 120% of AMI (~$120,080) • Restrictions will be placed on the property to keep affordable for as long as legally possible. The proposed development would be required to seek all required regulatory approvals from the Planning Commission and City Council. Resolution No. 2020-62 The attached Resolution requests that the City Council scheduled a Public Hearing for July 21, 2020 to consider the sale of the Property to the Edina Housing Foundation. Next Steps: • Public Hearing to convey the City owned median. • Public Hearing to Vacate the Right of Ways. • Create easements for Utilities. • Plat the site. • Sell platted median and ROW to the Edina Housing Foundation. RESOLUTION NO. 2020-62 CALLING A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED CONVEYANCE OF CITY OWNED PROPERTY TO THE EDINA HOUSING FOUNDATION BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council for the City of Edina, Minnesota (the “City”) as follows: Section 1. Public Hearing. This Council shall meet on July 21, at approximately 7:00 P.M., for a public hearing on the proposed conveyance of City owned property to the Edina Housing Foundation for the development of affordable housing legally described as: That part of unnumbered irregular tract south of Block 1 in Duggan Plaza, “Brookview Heights 1st Addition”, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying west of the line drawn from the southeast corner of Lot 31, Block 1, “Brookview Heights 1st Addition” to the northeast corner of Lot 9, Block 1, Brookview Heights 2nd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. AND That part of vacated road, Duggan Plaza, as dedicated in “Brookview Heights 1st Addition”’ Hennepin County, Minnesota lying south of the unnumbered irregular tract south of Block 1, “Brookview Heights Additions” and between the southerly extension of the west of lot 31, Block 1, “Brookview Heights 1st Addition” to the south line of said Addition and a line drawn from the southeast corner of said Lot 31 to the northeast corner of Lot 9, Block 1 Brookview Heights 2nd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. AND The part of the south half of vacated road, Duggan Plaza, as dedicated in “Brookview Heights 1st Addition”, Henneoin County, Minnesota lying north of the unnumbered irregular tract south of Block 1, “Brookview Heights 1st Addition” and between the southerly extension of the west of Lot 31, “Brookview Heights 1st Addition” to the south line of said Addition and the line drawn from the southeast corner of said Lot 31 to the northwest corner of Lot 9, Block 1 Brookview Heights 2nd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota Section 2. Notice of Public Hearing. City staff is authorized and directed to work with Campbell Knutson, P.A. to prepare all legal documents. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause notice of the hearing, together with an appropriate map as required by law, to be published at least once in the official newspaper of the City not later than 10, nor more than 30, days prior to July 21, 2020. Adopted by the Edina City Council this 16th day of June 2020. ATTEST: _______________________________ _______________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Chair STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 16, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this __________ day of ___________________, 2020. Executive Director Date: June 16, 2020 Agenda Item #: IX.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2020-57: Approving Right-of-Way Easement Vacation at Oak Lane and Garden Avenue Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2020-57 to Vacate Oak Lane Right-of-Way between Oak Lane and Garden Avenue contingent on the adjacent owners providing trailway, sidewalk, drainage & utility easements. INTRODUCTION: Richard and Lisa Bale, and Steve and Kelly Housh have applied for a vacation of the right-of-way easement at Oak Lane and Garden Avenue and, area residents are willing to provide new sidewalk, trailway, drainage and utility easements. New easements would not be required for Lots 29 & 30 of the Warden Acres Plat. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2020-57: Approving Right-of-Way Easement Vacation Public Hearing Notice Application Better Together Public Hearing Report 209993v2 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-57 RESOLUTION VACATING SEGMENTS OF OAK LANE AND GARDEN AVENUE WHEREAS, an application was received on April 22, 2020 from Richard and Lisa Bale and Steve and Kelly Housh requesting vacation of right of way for portions of Oak Lane and Garden Avenue; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 412.851 the City Council of the City of Edina has conducted a hearing on June 2, 2020, preceded by the statutorily required two (2) weeks published and posted notice and mailed notice to the abutting property owners, to consider the vacation of right of way legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein (“Vacated ROW”) WHEREAS, following the hearing the City Council and consideration of the proposed vacation, the City Council has determined that the Vacated ROW is not needed for purposes of a public street provided that easements are established for future trail, drain and utility purposes over the area within the Vacated ROW; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota: 1. The Vacated ROW is vacated conditioned upon the City obtaining easements for trail, drainage and utilities over the property described in Paragraphs 1-3 of Exhibit A in a form approved by the City from all appropriate abutting fee owners, which easements shall be recorded simultaneously with this Resolution. 2. The vacation shall not affect the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling the electric or telephone poles and lines, gas lines, sanitary and storm sewer lines, water pipes, mains, hydrants, and natural drainage areas thereon or thereunder, to continue maintain the same or to enter upon such way or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereof. 4. The City Clerk shall transmit a certified duplicate of this Resolution to the County Auditor and County Recorder together with the easements identified in Paragraph 1 of this Resolution. PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 16th day of June, 2020 by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota. Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor 209993v2 STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 16, 2020 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this _____ day of __________, 20___. _______________________________ City Clerk 209993v2 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTIN OF VACATED ROW 1. Oak Lane as dedicated in WARDEN ACRES AUSTIN REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying southerly of the westerly extension of the easterly line of Oak Lane as dedicated in WARDEN ACRES AUSTIN 2ND REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota; 2. Oak Lane as dedicated in WARDEN ACRES DAHLE REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota, 3. Oak Lane as dedicated in WARDEN ACRES PETERSON REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying west of the southerly extension of Lot 3, Block 1, of said WARDEN ACRES PETERSON REPLAT; 4. The Easement for Public Road Purposes dated October 15, 1976 and filed October 25, 1976 as Document Number 4241786 with the Hennepin County Recorder’s Office, affecting only that part of the real property described below: The north 25 feet of the west 20.52 feet of Lot 29 and the north 25 feet of Lot 30, Warden Acres, Hennepin County, Minnesota. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CERTIFICATE OF MAILING NOTICE CITY OF EDINA ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified acting City Clerk of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby certify that on the following dates May 22, 2020, acting on behalf of said City, I deposited in the United States mail copies of the attached Notice of Public Hearing for Vacation of Public Right of Way Easement (Oak Lane/Garden Avenue) (Exhibit A), enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon duly prepaid, addressed to the persons at the addresses as shown on the mailing list (Exhibit B), attached to the original hereof, which list is on file in my office, said persons being those appearing on the records of the County Auditor as owners of the property listed opposite their respective names, as of a date 10 days prior to the date of the hearing; and that I also sent said notice to the following corporations at the indicated addresses whose property is exempt from taxation and is therefore not carried on the records of said County Auditor. NAME ADDRESS WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this 22nd day of May, 2020. ________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk 3211721410091 ANIRUDHA M GHOLKAR 5417 GROVE ST EDINA MN 55436 3211721410093 MATTHEW & BRITTANY HANSEN 5805 GARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55436 3211721410094 D J LYNCH & S A R LYNCH 5809 GARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55436 3211721410084 MELVIN JOEL SONGSTAD JR 5424 BENTON AVE EDINA MN 55436 3211721410047 CCNTHIA L ROERS 5416 BENTON AVE EDINA MN 55436 3211721410085 MELVIN JOEL SONGSTAD JR 5424 BENTON AVE EDINA MN 55436 3211721410057 JOHN J & DENISE P NIX 5504 BENTON AVE EDINA MN 55436 3211721410058 M JOEL SONGSTAD JR 5424 BENTON AVE SO EDINA MN 55436 3211721410059 THOMAS M KAFKA 5506 BENTON AVE EDINA MN 55436 3211721410060 JOSEPH & ANGELA CAMPBELL 5512 BENTON AVE EDINA MN 55436 3211721410061 M JOEL AND MARGARET SONGSATD 5424 BENTON AVE EDINA MN 55436 3211721410062 SHAMAR YOUNG & TINA SANGHVI 5516 BENTON AVE EDINA MN 55436 3211721410035 MICHELLE C & DENNIS M ZUZEK 5524 BENTON AVE EDINA MN 55436 3211721410033 PAUL R & SUSAN K DANIELSON 5813 JOHNSON DRIVE EDINA MN 55436 3211721410079 MICHAEL DEBELAK & JANET CONN 5804 OAK LA EDINA MN 55436 3211721410078 JOSEPH & MARINA LEVINE 5521 GROVE ST EDINA MN 55436 3211721410082 JOHN W GLIEDEN 5515 GROVE ST EDINA MN 55436 3211721410100 R W BALE & L M BALE 5805 OAK LA EDINA MN 55436 3211721410105 L R LETTOW & V D LETTOW 5425 GROVE ST EDINA MN 55436 3211721410096 JAMES M ZAPPA 5804 GARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55436 3211721410097 STEVEN C HOUSH 5808 GARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55436 3211721410107 BRADLEY & CAROLINE CARLIN 5451 GROVE ST EDINA MN 55436 3211721410106 SCOTT D FORSBERG & CYNTHIA DELLA SANTINA 5501 GROVE ST EDINA MN 55436 3211721410101 CURTIS & VALBORG AUSTIN 9328 FATHER JOE LA PEQUOT LAKES MN 56472 3211721410092 ABIGAIL & BRIAN HEIDEMANN 5409 GROVE ST EDINA MN 55436 3211721410080 RONALD J FRABONI 5505 GROVE ST EDINA MN 55436 3211721410081 SCOTT & STACEY HUGHES 5509 GROVE ST EDINA MN 55436 CITY OF EDINA 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT IN THE CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota will hold a public hearing on, Tuesday, June 2, 2020 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at 4801 West 50th Street to consider the requested vacation of the following public right-of-way easement located at Oak Lane and Garden Avenue: PROPOSED DESCRIPTIONS Portions Subject To Street Right-of-Way To Be Vacated are Underlined. Sidewalk, Trail, Drainage and Utility Easements to Remain 1. Lot 1, Block 1, WARDEN ACRES AUSTIN 2ND REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota, AND Oak Lane as dedicated in WARDEN ACRES AUSTIN REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying southerly of the westerly extension of the easterly line of Oak Lane as dedicated in WARDEN ACRES AUSTIN 2ND REPLAT and westerly of a line drawn perpendicular to the south line of said WARDEN ACRES AUSTIN 2ND REPLAT from the southeast corner of said Lot 1. 2. OUTLOT A, WARDEN ACRES AUSTIN 2ND REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota, AND Oak Lane as dedicated in WARDEN ACRES AUSTIN REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying easterly of a line drawn perpendicular to the south line of said WARDEN ACRES AUSTIN 2ND REPLAT, from the southwest corner of OUTLOT A, said WARDEN ACRES AUSTIN 2ND REPLAT. 3. Lot 1, Block 1, WARDEN ACRES DAHLE REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota, AND That part of OUTLOT A, lying westerly of the easterly 75.00 feet thereof, WARDEN ACRES DAHLE REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota, AND Oak Lane as dedicated in WARDEN ACRES DAHLE REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying west of the southerly extension of the west line of the east 75.00 feet of OUTLOT A, said WARDEN ACRES DAHLE REPLAT. 4. Lot 2, Block 1, WARDEN ACRES DAHLE REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota, AND Easterly 75.00 feet of OUTLOT A, WARDEN ACRES DAHLE REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota, AND Oak Lane as dedicated in WARDEN ACRES DAHLE REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying east of the southerly extension of the west line of the east 75.00 of OUTLOT A, said WARDEN ACRES DAHLE REPLAT. 5. Lot 3, and south 14.00 feet of Lot 2, Block 1, WARDEN ACRES PETERSON REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota, AND Oak Lane as dedicated in WARDEN ACRES PETERSON REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying west of the southerly extension of the east line of Block 1, said WARDEN ACRES PETERSON REPLAT. 6.The West 85.98 feet of Lot 30, WARDEN ACRES, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 7.That part of Lot 29 lying west of the east 125.00 feet of Lot 29 and that part of Lot 30lying east of the west 85.98 feet of Lot 30, WARDEN ACRES, Hennepin County,Minnesota. All persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether the above proposed street right of way and utility and drainage vacation is in the public interest and should be made shall be heard at said time and place. The Council shall consider the extent to which such proposed street vacation affects existing easements within the area of the proposed vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric, telephone or cable television poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto, for the purpose of specifying, in any such vacation resolution, the extent to which any or all of such easement, and such authority to maintain, and to enter upon the area of the proposed vacation, shall continue. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL Sharon Allison, City Clerk Dated: May 22, 2020 License No. Date I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report wasprepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws ofthe State of VICINITY MAP Field Crew Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. Minnesota. Steven F. Hough - PLS 54850 19805 HDN SFH SFH 01/28/20 SITE CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project areinstruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completionof this project by others without written approval by theConsultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall bemade at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Plotted: 01 /28 / 2020 10:21 AMW:\2019\19805\CADD DATA\SURVEY\_dwg Sheet Files\S19805-EXHIBITOUCKSL QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS CADD QUALIFICATION OAK LANE EDINA, MN LARSON KING, LLP 30 E SEVENTH STREET SUITE 2800 ST. PAUL, MN 55101 01/28/20 EXHIBIT ISSUED VACATION EXHIBIT 1 OF 2 N SCALE IN FEET 0 60 ROW TO BE VACATEDROW Vacation Description January 28, 2020 Oak Lane as dedicated in WARDEN ACRES AUSTIN REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying southerly of the westerly extension of the easterly line of Oak Lane as dedicated in WARDEN ACRES AUSTIN 2ND REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota, And Oak Lane as dedicated in WARDEN ACRES DAHLE REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota, And Oak Lane as dedicated in WARDEN ACRES PETERSON REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying west of the southerly extension of Lot 3, Block 1, said WARDEN ACRES PETERSON REPLAT, And The north 25.00 feet of Lots 29 and 30, lying west of the east 125.00 feet of said Lot 29, WARDEN ACRES HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA. SURVEY REPORT 1.See sheet 2 of 2 for the aerial overlay. License No. Date I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report wasprepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws ofthe State of VICINITY MAP Field Crew Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. Minnesota. Steven F. Hough - PLS 54850 19805 HDN SFH SFH 01/28/20 SITE CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project areinstruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completionof this project by others without written approval by theConsultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall bemade at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Plotted: 01 /28 / 2020 10:20 AMW:\2019\19805\CADD DATA\SURVEY\_dwg Sheet Files\S19805-EXHIBITOUCKSL QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS CADD QUALIFICATION OAK LANE EDINA, MN LARSON KING, LLP 30 E SEVENTH STREET SUITE 2800 ST. PAUL, MN 55101 01/28/20 EXHIBIT ISSUED AERIAL EXHIBIT 2 OF 2 N SCALE IN FEET 0 60 ROW TO BE VACATED SURVEY REPORT 1.The purpose of this exhibit is to show an aerial overlay. 2.See sheet 1 of 2 for the vacation description. EXHIBIT A License No. Date I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report wasprepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws ofthe State of VICINITY MAP Field Crew Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. Minnesota. Steven F. Hough - PLS 54850 19805 HDN SFH SFH 01/28/20 SITE CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project areinstruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completionof this project by others without written approval by theConsultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall bemade at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Plotted: 01 /28 / 2020 10:21 AMW:\2019\19805\CADD DATA\SURVEY\_dwg Sheet Files\S19805-EXHIBITOUCKSL QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS CADD QUALIFICATION OAK LANE EDINA, MN LARSON KING, LLP 30 E SEVENTH STREET SUITE 2800 ST. PAUL, MN 55101 01/28/20 EXHIBIT ISSUED VACATION EXHIBIT 1 OF 2 N SCALE IN FEET 0 60 ROW TO BE VACATEDROW Vacation Description January 28, 2020 Oak Lane as dedicated in WARDEN ACRES AUSTIN REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying southerly of the westerly extension of the easterly line of Oak Lane as dedicated in WARDEN ACRES AUSTIN 2ND REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota, And Oak Lane as dedicated in WARDEN ACRES DAHLE REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota, And Oak Lane as dedicated in WARDEN ACRES PETERSON REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying west of the southerly extension of Lot 3, Block 1, said WARDEN ACRES PETERSON REPLAT, And The north 25.00 feet of Lots 29 and 30, lying west of the east 125.00 feet of said Lot 29, WARDEN ACRES HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA. SURVEY REPORT 1.See sheet 2 of 2 for the aerial overlay. License No. Date I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report wasprepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws ofthe State of VICINITY MAP Field Crew Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. Minnesota. Steven F. Hough - PLS 54850 19805 HDN SFH SFH 01/28/20 SITE CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project areinstruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completionof this project by others without written approval by theConsultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall bemade at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Plotted: 01 /28 / 2020 10:20 AMW:\2019\19805\CADD DATA\SURVEY\_dwg Sheet Files\S19805-EXHIBITOUCKSL QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS CADD QUALIFICATION OAK LANE EDINA, MN LARSON KING, LLP 30 E SEVENTH STREET SUITE 2800 ST. PAUL, MN 55101 01/28/20 EXHIBIT ISSUED AERIAL EXHIBIT 2 OF 2 N SCALE IN FEET 0 60 ROW TO BE VACATED SURVEY REPORT 1.The purpose of this exhibit is to show an aerial overlay. 2.See sheet 1 of 2 for the vacation description. EXHIBIT B License No. Date I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report wasprepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws ofthe State of VICINITY MAP Field Crew Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. Minnesota. Steven F. Hough - PLS 54850 19805 HDN SFH SFH 01/28/20 SITE CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project areinstruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completionof this project by others without written approval by theConsultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall bemade at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Plotted: 01 /28 / 2020 10:21 AMW:\2019\19805\CADD DATA\SURVEY\_dwg Sheet Files\S19805-EXHIBITOUCKSL QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS CADD QUALIFICATION OAK LANE EDINA, MN LARSON KING, LLP 30 E SEVENTH STREET SUITE 2800 ST. PAUL, MN 55101 01/28/20 EXHIBIT ISSUED VACATION EXHIBIT 1 OF 2 N SCALE IN FEET 0 60 ROW TO BE VACATEDROW Vacation Description January 28, 2020 Oak Lane as dedicated in WARDEN ACRES AUSTIN REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying southerly of the westerly extension of the easterly line of Oak Lane as dedicated in WARDEN ACRES AUSTIN 2ND REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota, And Oak Lane as dedicated in WARDEN ACRES DAHLE REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota, And Oak Lane as dedicated in WARDEN ACRES PETERSON REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying west of the southerly extension of Lot 3, Block 1, said WARDEN ACRES PETERSON REPLAT, And The north 25.00 feet of Lots 29 and 30, lying west of the east 125.00 feet of said Lot 29, WARDEN ACRES HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA. SURVEY REPORT 1.See sheet 2 of 2 for the aerial overlay. License No. Date I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report wasprepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws ofthe State of VICINITY MAP Field Crew Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. Minnesota. Steven F. Hough - PLS 54850 19805 HDN SFH SFH 01/28/20 SITE CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project areinstruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completionof this project by others without written approval by theConsultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall bemade at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Plotted: 01 /28 / 2020 10:20 AMW:\2019\19805\CADD DATA\SURVEY\_dwg Sheet Files\S19805-EXHIBITOUCKSL QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS CADD QUALIFICATION OAK LANE EDINA, MN LARSON KING, LLP 30 E SEVENTH STREET SUITE 2800 ST. PAUL, MN 55101 01/28/20 EXHIBIT ISSUED AERIAL EXHIBIT 2 OF 2 N SCALE IN FEET 0 60 ROW TO BE VACATED SURVEY REPORT 1.The purpose of this exhibit is to show an aerial overlay. 2.See sheet 1 of 2 for the vacation description. Loucks Project No. 19805SCALE IN FEET060NLicense No. DateI hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota.Henry D. Nelson - PLS1725503/03/20EXHIBITDescriptionMarch 03, 2020Lot 1, Block 1, WARDEN ACRES AUSTIN 2ND REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota,ANDOak Lane as dedicated in WARDEN ACRES AUSTIN REPLAT, Hennepin County,Minnesota, lying southerly of the westerly extension of the easterly line of Oak Lane asdedicated in WARDEN ACRES AUSTIN 2ND REPLAT and westerly of a line drawnperpendicular to the south line of said WARDEN ACRES AUSTIN 2ND REPLAT fromthe southeast corner of said Lot 1.W:\2019\19805\CADD DATA\SURVEY\_dwg Sheet Files\S19805-EXHIBIT OUCKSL Loucks Project No. 19805SCALE IN FEET060NLicense No. DateI hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota.Henry D. Nelson - PLS1725503/03/20EXHIBITW:\2019\19805\CADD DATA\SURVEY\_dwg Sheet Files\S19805-EXHIBIT OUCKSLDescriptionMarch 03, 2020OUTLOT A, WARDEN ACRES AUSTIN 2ND REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota,ANDOak Lane as dedicated in WARDEN ACRES AUSTIN REPLAT, Hennepin County,Minnesota, lying easterly of a line drawn perpendicular to the south line of saidWARDEN ACRES AUSTIN 2ND REPLAT, from the southwest corner of OUTLOT A,said WARDEN ACRES AUSTIN 2ND REPLAT. Loucks Project No. 19805SCALE IN FEET060NEXHIBITDescriptionMarch 03, 2020Lot 1, Block 1, WARDEN ACRES DAHLE REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota,ANDThat part of OUTLOT A, lying westerly of the easterly 75.00 feet thereof, WARDENACRES DAHLE REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota,ANDOak Lane as dedicated in WARDEN ACRES DAHLE REPLAT, Hennepin County,Minnesota, lying west of the southerly extension of the west line of the east 75.00 feetof OUTLOT A, said WARDEN ACRES DAHLE REPLAT.W:\2019\19805\CADD DATA\SURVEY\_dwg Sheet Files\S19805-EXHIBIT OUCKSLLicense No. DateI hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota.Henry D. Nelson - PLS1725503/03/20 Loucks Project No. 19805SCALE IN FEET060NEXHIBITDescriptionMarch 03, 2020Lot 2, Block 1, WARDEN ACRES DAHLE REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota,ANDEasterly 75.00 feet of OUTLOT A, WARDEN ACRES DAHLE REPLAT, HennepinCounty, Minnesota,ANDOak Lane as dedicated in WARDEN ACRES DAHLE REPLAT, Hennepin County,Minnesota, lying east of the southerly extension of the west line of the east 75.00 ofOUTLOT A, said WARDEN ACRES DAHLE REPLAT.W:\2019\19805\CADD DATA\SURVEY\_dwg Sheet Files\S19805-EXHIBIT OUCKSLLicense No. DateI hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota.Henry D. Nelson - PLS1725503/03/20 Loucks Project No. 19805SCALE IN FEET060NEXHIBITDescriptionMarch 03, 2020Lot 3, and south 14.00 feet of Lot 2, Block 1, WARDEN ACRES PETERSON REPLAT,Hennepin County, Minnesota,AndOak Lane as dedicated in WARDEN ACRES PETERSON REPLAT, Hennepin County,Minnesota, lying west of the southerly extension of the east line of Block 1, saidWARDEN ACRES PETERSON REPLAT.W:\2019\19805\CADD DATA\SURVEY\_dwg Sheet Files\S19805-EXHIBIT OUCKSLLicense No. DateI hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota.Henry D. Nelson - PLS1725503/03/20 Loucks Project No. 19805SCALE IN FEET060NEXHIBITDescriptionMarch 03, 2020The West 85.98 feet of Lot 30, WARDEN ACRES, Hennepin County, Minnesota.W:\2019\19805\CADD DATA\SURVEY\_dwg Sheet Files\S19805-EXHIBIT OUCKSLLicense No. DateI hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota.Henry D. Nelson - PLS1725503/03/20 Loucks Project No. 19805SCALE IN FEET060NEXHIBITW:\2019\19805\CADD DATA\SURVEY\_dwg Sheet Files\S19805-EXHIBIT OUCKSLDescriptionMarch 03, 2020That part of Lot 29 lying west of the east 125.00 feet of Lot 29 and that part of Lot 30lying east of the west 85.98 feet of Lot 30, WARDEN ACRES, Hennepin County,Minnesota.License No. DateI hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota.Henry D. Nelson - PLS1725503/03/20 EXHIBIT C LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF PROPERTIES Portions Subject To Right-of-Way To Be Vacated are Underlined 5805 Oak Lane R W Bale & L M Bankey Lot 1, Block 1, WARDEN ACRES AUSTIN 2ND REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota, AND Oak Lane as dedicated in WARDEN ACRES AUSTIN REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying southerly of the westerly extension of the easterly line of Oak Lane as dedicated in WARDEN ACRES AUSTIN 2ND REPLAT and westerly of a line drawn perpendicular to the south line of said WARDEN ACRES AUSTIN 2ND REPLAT from the southeast corner of said Lot 1. 24 Unassigned (Outlot) C E & V J Austin Jt Rev Trst OUTLOT A, WARDEN ACRES AUSTIN 2ND REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota, AND Oak Lane as dedicated in WARDEN ACRES AUSTIN REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying easterly of a line drawn perpendicular to the south line of said WARDEN ACRES AUSTIN 2ND REPLAT, from the southwest corner of OUTLOT A, said WARDEN ACRES AUSTIN 2ND REPLAT. 5501 Grove Ave Scott D. Forsberg et al Lot 1, Block 1, WARDEN ACRES DAHLE REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota, AND That part of OUTLOT A, lying westerly of the easterly 75.00 feet thereof, WARDEN ACRES DAHLE REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota, AND Oak Lane as dedicated in WARDEN ACRES DAHLE REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying west of the southerly extension of the west line of the east 75.00 feet of OUTLOT A, said WARDEN ACRES DAHLE REPLAT. 2 5451 Grove St B P & C A Carlin Lot 2, Block 1, WARDEN ACRES DAHLE REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota, AND Easterly 75.00 feet of OUTLOT A, WARDEN ACRES DAHLE REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota, AND Oak Lane as dedicated in WARDEN ACRES DAHLE REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying east of the southerly extension of the west line of the east 75.00 of OUTLOT A, said WARDEN ACRES DAHLE REPLAT. 5808 Garden Ave Steven C Housh Kelly A Housh Lot 3, and south 14.00 feet of Lot 2, Block 1, WARDEN ACRES PETERSON REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota, AND Oak Lane as dedicated in WARDEN ACRES PETERSON REPLAT, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying west of the southerly extension of the east line of Block 1, said WARDEN ACRES PETERSON REPLAT. 5424 Benton Ave Melvin J Songstad Jr & Wife The West 85.98 feet of Lot 30, WARDEN ACRES, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 5420 Benton Ave M & M Songstad Jr That part of Lot 29 lying west of the east 125.00 feet of Lot 29 and that part of Lot 30 lying east of the west 85.98 feet of Lot 30, WARDEN ACRES, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The City Council City of Edina Petition Petition Instructions This petition form is to be used to ask the Edina City Council to consider the following types of improvements: SIDEWALK ALLEY PAVING WATER MAIN STORM SEWER PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER CURB AND GUTTER ONLY (WITHOUT PERMANENT STREET SURFACING) SANITARY SEWER STREET LIGHTING or another improvement you describe (called OTHER on this form). You may use another petition form if you wish but the city council may reject such petitions unless they contain the following information: 1. Type of improvement(s) requested, e.g., SIDEWALK, STORM SEWER, WATER MAIN, ETC. 2. Precise locations(s) of the requested improvements. 3. A statement that all who sign the petition understand that the city council may assess the costs of these improvements against the properties benefiting from the improvements in amounts determined by the Council. 4. Printed name of property owner, owner’s signature and phone number, and property address. 5. Signature of person circulating the petition. If you have questions, please call the City Clerk at 952-927-8861 between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. SHARON ALLISON CITY CLERK APRIL 2008 City of Edina, Minnesota CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 ( (952) 927-8861 • (952) 927-7645 FAX • (612) 927-5461 TDD PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL SIDEWALK ALLEY PAVING WATER MAIN STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER STREET LIGHTING CURB AND GUTTER ONLY PERMANENT STREET OTHER:____________ SURFACING WITH ___________________ CURB AND GUTTER ___________________ To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. __________________________________between_________________________and_______________________ LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS __________________________________between_________________________and_______________________ LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS __________________________________between_________________________and_______________________ LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS __________________________________between_________________________and_______________________ LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS PROPERTY OWNER’S OWNER’S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS SIGNATURE (PRINTED) (PRINTED) ____________________ _____________________________ __________________________ ____________________ ______________________________ __________________________ ____________________ _____________________________ __________________________ ____________________ ______________________________ __________________________ ____________________ ______________________________ __________________________ This petition was circulated by: __________________________________ _________________________________ ________ NAME ADDRESS PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back. DATE RECEIVED: IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. APRIL 2008 X Vacate Right-of-Way Between Oak Lane and Garden Ave With Sidewalk/Trail Easement to Remain Vacate Right-of-Way With Sidewalk/Trail Easement To Remain Oak Lane, Edina, MN Garden Ave, Edina, MN See Attached. Kelly Housh 5808 Garden Ave., Edina, MN PROPERTY OWNER’S OWNER’S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS SIGNATURE (PRINTED) (PRINTED) ____________________ _____________________________ __________________________ ____________________ ______________________________ __________________________ ____________________ ______________________________ __________________________ ____________________ _____________________________ __________________________ ____________________ _____________________________ __________________________ ____________________ _____________________________ __________________________ ____________________ _____________________________ __________________________ ____________________ _____________________________ __________________________ ____________________ _____________________________ __________________________ ____________________ _____________________________ __________________________ ____________________ _____________________________ __________________________ ____________________ _____________________________ __________________________ ____________________ _____________________________ __________________________ ____________________ _____________________________ __________________________ ____________________ _____________________________ __________________________ ____________________ _____________________________ __________________________ ____________________ _____________________________ __________________________ ____________________ _____________________________ __________________________ ____________________ _____________________________ __________________________ ____________________ _____________________________ __________________________ ____________________ _____________________________ __________________________ This petition was circulated by: __________________________________ _________________________________ ___________________ NAME ADDRESS PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 PROPERTIES THAT ABUT OAK LANE GARDEN AVE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND LIST OF OWNERS ACCORDING TO HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY RECORDS 5804 Oak Lane M Debelak J M Conn 5808 Oak Lane M Debelak JM Conn 5813 Johnson Drive P & S Danielson 5524 Benton Ave M C Zuzek & D M Zuzek 5520 Benton Ave Melvin J Songstad Jr et al 5516 Benton Ave Shamar Young & Tina Sanghvi 5512 Benton Ave J M Campbell & A R Campbell 5506 Benton Ave Thomas M Kafka et al 5504 Benton Ave J J Nix & D P Nix 5500 Benton Ave M & M Songstad Jr 5424 Benton Ave Melvin J Songstad Jr & Wife 5420 Benton Ave M & M Songstad Jr 5416 Benton Ave Ccnthia L Roers 5809 Garden Ave D J Lynch & S A R Lynch 5808 Garden Ave Steven C Housh Kelly A Housh 5451 Grove St B P & C A Carlin 5501 Grove Ave Scott D Forsberg et al 24 Unassigned (Outlot) C E & V J Austin Jt Rev Trst 5805 Oak Lane R W Bale & L M Bankey Project Report 11 May 2020 - 09 June 2020 Better Together Edina Public Hearing: Right of Way Vacation - Oak Lane& Garden Lane Highlights TOTALVISITS 35 MAX VISITORS PERDAY 12 NEW REGISTRATI ONS 9 ENGAGED VISITORS 10 INFORMED VISITORS 15 AWARE VISITORS 29 Aware Participants 29 Aware Actions Performed Participants Visited a Project or Tool Page 29 Informed Participants 15 Informed Actions Performed Participants Viewed a video 0 Viewed a photo 0 Downloaded a document 0 Visited the Key Dates page 2 Visited an FAQ list Page 0 Visited Instagram Page 0 Visited Multiple Project Pages 5 Contributed to a tool (engaged)10 Engaged Participants 10 Engaged Actions Performed Registered Unverified Anonymous Contributed on Forums 0 0 0 Participated in Surveys 0 0 0 Contributed to Newsfeeds 0 0 0 Participated in Quick Polls 0 0 0 Posted on Guestbooks 10 0 0 Contributed to Stories 0 0 0 Asked Questions 0 0 0 Placed Pins on Places 0 0 0 Contributed to Ideas 0 0 0 Visitors Summary Pageviews Visitors 2 Jun '20 4 Jun '20 6 Jun '20 8 Jun '20 20 40 Tool Type Engagement Tool Name Tool Status Visitors Registered Unverified Anonymous Contributors Qanda Q&A Published 9 0 0 0 Guest Book Comments Published 20 10 0 0 Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 11 May 2020 to 09 June 2020 ENGAGEMENT TOOLS SUMMARY 0 FORUM TOPICS 0 SURVEYS 0 NEWS FEEDS 0 QUICK POLLS 1 GUEST BOOKS 0 STORIES 1 Q&A S 0 PLACES Page 2 of 7 Widget Type Engagement Tool Name Visitors Views/Downloads Key Dates Key Date 2 2 Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 11 May 2020 to 09 June 2020 INFORMATION WIDGET SUMMARY 0 DOCUMENTS 0 PHOTOS 0 VIDEOS 0 FAQS 0 KEY DATES Page 3 of 7 Visitors 20 Contributors 10 CONTRIBUTIONS 11 02 June 20 JanetC AGREES 0 DISAGRE ES 0 REPLIES 0 Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 11 May 2020 to 09 June 2020 GUEST BOOK Comments We live at 5804 Oak Lane and also own the adjacent lot that abuts the right-of-way. We strongly support the motion to vacate the right-of-way, as well as the related proc ess of the City taking ownership of the outlot and preserving it as part of the natural w etland and woodland between the two cul-de-sacs (Oak Land and Garden Avenue). T hank you. Janet Conn and Michael Debelak Page 4 of 7 02 June 20 Joel AGREES 0 DISAGRE ES 0 REPLIES 0 02 June 20 Dennis Z AGREES 0 DISAGRE ES 0 REPLIES 0 02 June 20 Kafka AGREES 0 DISAGRE ES 0 REPLIES 0 Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 11 May 2020 to 09 June 2020 GUEST BOOK Comments We live at 5424 Benton Av and we do not support the Vacation of the Public Right-Of- Way on the east side. We do support the vacation of the Public Right of Way on the w est. M y wife and I own 5420 and 5424 Benton: the 2 lots below that are going to get t he 25’ strip of land that you took in early 1970’s for a road planned to allow for lots to be created from 299’ deep lots because it was a good use of the land. Then Curt Austin starting in the mid 1970’s and early 1980’s subdivided land and Oak Lane cam e into being with the city taking 50’ for for a road going south from Oak Lane and a 25 Ft easement for a Public Road taking a 90 degree turn and heading east to meet up w ith Garden Ave. Then in the mid 1980's land was subdivided and Garden Ave came i nto being with a road easement of 25’ taken in that land subdivision from Warden Acr es Peterson Replat Block 001 Lots 3 and S 14 Ft Of Lot 2. Then in 1988 Dahle subdivided a lot on Grove St that was 299’ deep also and a 25’ strip of right away for a road was taken from both new lots - the easterly one is Warden Acres Dahle Replat Block 001 Lot 2 And Ely 75 Ft Of Outlot A . We also own 5500 Benton The east 75 Ft of Lot 39 Warden Acres that adjoins 5424 Benton Av. This grouping of 3 properties in a row on Benton Ave along with the Planned Road Public Right-Of Way Easement all ows me the opportunity to develop the back of my 3 lots into 2 buildable lots. You are talking about doing away with a Public Right-Of-Way Easement. I remember this land in 1975 prior to 6 houses being built. The land was attractive and home to wildlife gal ore and more trees. And the wetland was maybe cleaner because there were fewer lawns getting treated chemically? Prior to 1976 very few houses on Grove Street and no Garden Ave and no Oak Lane. Was it better? Just different. So putting in 2 more h ouses on the back of my 3 properties will make things different but not worse. So 6 out of the 12 petitioning for this vacating were not here and they now are petitioning to keep land from being developed. The irony of that speaks to wanting what they want. If you approve this Vacation then you are going against the greater good for the com munity. Vacant land created into buildable lots is rare in Edina. The city council knew that when they proposed lots being created on the back of extra deep yards. The wetl ands laws changed in about 1989 and I concur with the change. Clean water is not op tional. I would ask that the Council not vacate the Public Right-Of-Way Easement for Warden Acres Dahle Replat Block 001 Lot 2 And Ely 75 Ft Of Outlot A - meaning for 5451 Grove St [this is the Public Right-Of-Way Easement that abuts the back of my pr operty at 5500 Benton}. And not vacate the Public Right-Of-Way Easement for Block 001 Lots 3 and S 14Ft Of Lot 2 - meaning the 25 Ft Public Right-Of-Way Easement on the south side of 5804 Garden Av. And if you agree to not vacate your public right-of way for these 2 parcels then, of course, I agree to not ask you to vacate the public rig ht-of-way for my two parcels. You are giving up a Public Right-Off Way Easement for a planned road and I am being monetarily damaged by your actions. Respectfully, Ma rga and Joel Songstad We live at 5524 Benton Avenue and the back of our lot is adjacent to the right-of-way. We strongly support the vacation of the right-of-way because it will support the streng th of our neighborhood as well as protect wetland, trees, and wild life. Further, maintai ning the wetland offers one way to better manage run-off. Dennis and Shelly Zuzek Susan and Tom Kafka at 5506 Benton Ave support the Vacation of the Public Right of Way Page 5 of 7 02 June 20 Joel AGREES 0 DISAGRE ES 0 REPLIES 0 02 June 20 Mphansen AGREES 0 DISAGRE ES 0 REPLIES 0 03 June 20 Caroline Carlin AGREES 0 DISAGRE ES 0 REPLIES 0 03 June 20 Jane1 AGREES 0 DISAGRE ES 0 REPLIES 0 Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 11 May 2020 to 09 June 2020 GUEST BOOK Comments Prior to the wetlands change in 1989 I did option in 1986 or 87 the back 1/2 of the lot at 5500 Benton, 5516 Benton and the lot Curt Austin owned at Outlot A and met with others on Benton Av. The wetland need to be protected as clean water is not optionalso that change in 1989 was a good one! I never wanted or believed a road would go through after 1989. Melvin Songstad 5424 Benton Av We live at 5805 Garden Ave and strongly support the vacation of this right-of-way. This wooded and wetland area is not only in the fabric of this neighborhood, but the Gard en Ave cul-de-sac provides the quiet and safe neighborhood that many young families have been drawn to, and why they have purchased their home in this neighborhood. The lot sizes for the lots off of Benton do not support development, and in addition, wil l destroy the natural landscape and drive down property values for those homeowners on Garden and Grove due to increased traffic and housing congestion. This land coul d have been developed at any point over the decades but it hasn't. The land and neig hborhood has matured and it is time to make sure we keep it part of the appeal of our neighborhood for the benefit of all current and future residents. I also believe I signed t he petition to vacate the right-of-way but I did not see our house highlighted on the pr oposal when this was being presented during the city council meeting on 6/2. Matt H. I reside at 5451 Grove St, and am writing in support of the petition to vacate the right of way between Oak Lane and Garden Lane. As summarized in the phone testimony by Steve Housh on the night of June 2, this would complete a collaborative effort, supported by significant financial contributions from many in the neighborhood, to preserve the natural area and wetland between Grove St. and Benton Ave., and support the City’s long-term goals to protect natural wetland areas, take steps to limit the impact o f global warming, aid in the management of storm water runoff, and limit additional res idential density in the city to areas aligned with the long-term plan. The only barrier to an immediate approval of this vacation request is the concern about the impact of this change on Melvin (Joel) Songstad’s investment in the properties at 5420, 5424 and 5 500 Benton Ave. In the 45 years he has had an interest in the neighborhood, Mr. Songstad has periodically explored his option to subdivide these properties. However, his own testimony regarding the requested vacation states that he did not believe the right of way would be fully developed after the change in wetland law in 1989, and he is aware that variances on width, depth and total area would be required for this subdi vision. On the other hand, these properties have existing access to Benton Ave., and could be redeveloped into valuable homes without variances, as has been demonstra ted by the 2015 construction at 5512 and 5516 Benton. Both of these new homes hav e existing Zillow valuations well in excess of $1 million. This suggests Mr. Songstad h as significant opportunity to realize a return on his investment in the current, older ho mes built in 1977, 1947 and 1916, without subdivision and without increasing density outside of the scope of the City’s long-term plan. I strongly support the petition and ur ge the City Council to vote to grant the requested vacation. My husband and I live at 5504 Grove Street and are writing in support of the petition t o vacate the right of way between Oak Lane and Garden Lane. Our neighbors have d one a superb job in researching the wetlands and other impacts of the proposed devel opment. Vacating the right of way and keeping the land the way it is is consistent with Edina’s stated policies on being more of a green community. Page 6 of 7 04 June 20 John Nix AGREES 0 DISAGRE ES 0 REPLIES 0 06 June 20 LL AGREES 0 DISAGRE ES 0 REPLIES 0 07 June 20 Abbyheids AGREES 0 DISAGRE ES 0 REPLIES 0 Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 11 May 2020 to 09 June 2020 GUEST BOOK Comments We have lived at 5504 Benton Ave for 30 years. We fully support the petition to vacat e the right of way between Oak Lane and Garden Lane. This is line with the cities effo rts to maintain green space and wetland. We are very fortunate to have this beautiful environment , it adds immense value to the community and all families whose propert y is adjacent to it. We do not need more housing density in an established neighborh ood. The environmental benefits of this land outweigh any further development. John and Denise Nix We live at 5425 Grove Street and support the petition to vacate the right of way betwe en Oak Lane and Garden Lane. Preserving these wetlands and woodlands provides value to the neighborhood and supports Edina's long-term goal of being an environme ntally friendly city. Lynn Lettow We live at 5409 grove st and support the petition to vacate the right of way between o ak lane and garden lane. This wooded and wetland area along with the double cul-de -sacs drew us to the neighborhood since it provides nature and safety for our family a nd the other families in the neighborhood to enjoy. Page 7 of 7 Date: June 16, 2020 Agenda Item #: IX.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Jeff Brown, Community Health Administrator Item Activity: Subject:Ordinance No. 2020-08: Amending Chapter 12 of Edina City Code Concerning Tobacco Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve amendment to Ordinance No. 2020-08 and grant second reading. INTRODUCTION: This ordinance will define 'flavored tobacco product' and prohibit the sale of 'flavored tobacco product' in the City of Edina. This item started with an advisory communication and recommendation from the Community Health Commission submitted to Council on December 17, 2019. First reading of Ordinance 2020-08 was conducted on June 2, 2020, with second reading and vote held on June 16, 2020 to allow for correspondence to be submitted for consideration. ATTACHMENTS: Description Ordinance No. 2020-08: Amending Chapter 12 of Edina City Code 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2020-08 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING TOBACCO THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. The definitions in Section 12-189 of the Edina City Code are amended to include the following: Flavored tobacco product means any tobacco, tobacco-related product, or tobacco-related device that contains a taste or smell, other than the taste or smell of tobacco, that is distinguishable by an ordinary consumer either prior to or during consumption or use of the product or device, including, but not limited to, any taste or smell relating to menthol, mint, wintergreen, chocolate, cocoa, vanilla, honey, fruit, or any candy, dessert, alcoholic beverage, herb or spice. A public statement or claim, whether express or implied, made or disseminated by a manufacturer of the product or device, or by any person authorized or permitted by the manufacturer to make or disseminate public statements concerning such products, that a product has or produces a taste or smell other than tobacco will constitute presumptive evidence that the product is a flavored tobacco product. Section 2. The Edina City Code is amended by adding Section 12-257 to provide as follows: No person shall sell or offer for sale any flavored tobacco products. Section 3. This ordinance is effective September 1, 2020. First Reading: June 2, 2020 Second Reading: June 16, 2020 Published: ATTEST: _________________________________ _________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor 2 Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 16, 2020 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 16th day of June, 2020. _____________________________________ City Clerk Date: June 16, 2020 Agenda Item #: X.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Jennifer Garske, Executive Assistant Item Activity: Subject:Correspondence Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: Attached is correspondence received since the last City Council meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Description Correspondence 6-16-20 City of Edina Correspondence Submission If you are leaving comments for a public hearing being heard by Council or the Planning Commission, go to https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/public-hearings Correspondence Selection * Data Practices Advisory: Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all City Council Members and submitted for inclusion in the next public “Council packet.” Council packets are permanent records of materials prepared for City Council meetings. Council packets are public documents that are available in print, published on the City’s website and maintained in permanent electronic records. You are not required to complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name and street or email address, your comments will not be included in the Council packet. Open Meeting Law City Council Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Council Members cannot engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum of three or more members. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You might also receive a response from a City staff member. Email City Council: If you only want to email the City Council and not send your comments for publishing, contact members at CityCouncil@EdinaMN.gov. Contact Executive Assistant Jennifer Garske, at JGarske@EdinaMN.gov, if you have any questions or require assistance. Council Packet Deadline Correspondence must be received by noon the Friday prior to a City Council meeting in order to ensure it is published in the packet prior to the Council meeting. Submissions after that time may be included in a future Council packet. Name * Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Mayor & City Council Roberta Castellano 4854 France Ave S Edina MN 55410-1756 no dashes or spaces Comments * File Upload By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above. Friday, May 29, 2020 Concern regarding undisclosed change to Density guidance language for 44th & France, not properly subjected to a Public Process. Please see attached letter with 3 enclosures. Thank you. Roberta Castellano Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png 2020May29_toCC_Density Changed Outside of Public Process.pdf 128.47KB [ATT-1] Approved density in Table 3.6.pdf 118.01KB [ATT-2] Table 3.6 Density@44th&France_Changed on 2-7-2020.pdf 53.33KB [ATT-3] Table 3.6 Footnote about Max Density on 2- 7-2020.pdf 49.35KB R. Castellano, 5-29-2020, Page 1 of 1 Delivered to Council via the online Correspondence Submission Form Friday, May 29, 2020 Mayor and City Council, The City of Edina has changed made several undisclosed changes to the 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update, outside of a City Public Process that should include Proper Notice and Public Hearing. One example is the Density guidance at 44th & France. [ATT-1] The approved language, as shown in Table 3.6 was “44th & France – 12 du/acre and up”. [ATT-2] But behind the scenes, in a revision dated 2-7-2020, the City of Edina changed the language to “44th & France – 12-60 du/acre”. [ATT-3] In a footnote at the end of the altered Table 3.6, the City of Edina stated a reason for the alterations: “ ***Due to Metropolitan Council requirements, neighborhood node density guidance has been revised to provide minimum and maximum ranges for each identified area.” But that reason does not absolve the City of Edina from subjecting the change to a proper public process. I call on the City Council to withdraw the Maximum Density of 60 du/acre at 44th & France and insert a lower Maximum Density after conducting a proper Public Process. Thank you. Sincerely, Roberta Castellano 4854 France Ave S Edina, MN 55410-1756 [ATT-1] Approved density in Table 3.6 [ATT-2] Table 3.6 Density@44th&France_Changed on 2-7-2020 [ATT-3] Table 3.6 Footnote about Max Density on 2-7-2020 Edina Comprehensive Plan Land Use and Community Design Chapter Draft 12-31-19 3-29 Table 3.6: Future Land Use Categories Categories Description, Land Uses Development Character and Guidelines Density and Intensity Guidance** friendly street edge and provide convenient access to transit, schools, parks, and other community destinations. GSDR Greater Southdale District Residential Primarily residential area located in the core of the Greater Southdale District. Compared with other multifamily districts, this one has more compact buildings, structured parking, and a stronger focus on transit supportive densities. This may include some mixed- use elements compatible with residential development, such as small-scale retail, services, and institutional uses. 50 – 100 residential dwelling units/acre NN Neighborhood Node Current examples: • 44th & France • 70th & Cahill • Valley View & Wooddale In general, small-to moderate-scale commercial, residential or mixed-use buildings serving primarily the adjacent neighborhood(s). Primary uses encouraged are neighborhood-serving retail and services, offices, studios, institutional and residential. Building footprints generally less than 20,000 sq. ft. (or less for individual storefronts). Parking is less prominent than pedestrian features. Encourage underground parking (for comparatively larger developments), district parking for smaller developments, and open space linkages where feasible; emphasize enhancement of the pedestrian environment. Varies by small area: • Wooddale/Valley View – up to 30 du/acre • 70th & Cahill – 10-50 du/acre • 44th & France – 12 du/acre and up 30%/70% residential/commercial mixed-use Edina Comprehensive Plan Land Use and Community Design Chapter Draft 12-31-1902-07-20 3-29 Table 3.6: Future Land Use Categories Categories Description, Land Uses Development Character and Guidelines Density and Intensity Guidance** friendly street edge and provide convenient access to transit, schools, parks, and other community destinations. GSDR Greater Southdale District Residential Primarily residential area located in the core of the Greater Southdale District. Compared with other multifamily districts, this one has more compact buildings, structured parking, and a stronger focus on transit supportive densities. This may include some mixed- use elements compatible with residential development, such as small-scale retail, services, and institutional uses. 50 – 100 residential dwelling units/acre NN Neighborhood Node*** Current examples: 44th & France 70th & Cahill Valley View & Wooddale In general, small-to moderate-scale commercial, residential or mixed-use buildings serving primarily the adjacent neighborhood(s). Primary uses encouraged are neighborhood-serving retail and services, offices, studios, institutional and residential. Building footprints generally less than 20,000 sq. ft. (or less for individual storefronts). Parking is less prominent than pedestrian features. Encourage underground parking (for comparatively larger developments), district parking for smaller developments, and open space linkages where feasible; emphasize enhancement of the pedestrian environment. Varies by small area: Wooddale/Valley View – up to 12-30 du/acre 70th & Cahill – 10-50 du/acre 44th & France – 12-60 du/acre and up 30%/70% residential/commercial mixed-use Edina Comprehensive Plan Land Use and Community Design Chapter Draft 12-31-1902-07-20 3-33 Table 3.6: Future Land Use Categories Categories Description, Land Uses Development Character and Guidelines Density and Intensity Guidance** Limited Access Highway and TH 100) occupy land within the City to serve local and regional travel needs. NA N/A *Floor-to-area ratio, or FAR, refers to the ratio of a building’s floor area to the size of this lot. **For mixed use categories, estimated percentage of residential/commercial use split is included for the purposes of calculating capacity for growth. These are not binding requirements for specific development projects. ***Due to Metropolitan Council requirements, neighborhood node density guidance has been revised to provide minimum and maximum ranges for each identified area. Source: City of Edina Good evening, Mayor Hovland and Council Members. My name is Arjun Maheshwari and I am a graduating junior at Edina High School, and I called to offer my perspective on the proposed flavored tobacco prohibition. I am very proud that Edina was the first city in Minnesota to pass Tobacco 21. Thank you for your willingness to blaze the trail for the 70+ communities that followed…and finally this year, the state legislature. Unfortunately, the problem is far from solved. Rising e-cigarette rates have erased decades of progress reducing youth tobacco use. More than a quarter of Minnesota 11th-graders and over 10 percent of 8th-graders are vaping. Together with their business partner Altria/Philip Morris, JUUL is largely responsible for this crisis. They targeted kids as young as 8 with school programs, summer camps, social media influencers, ads on Nickelodeon and, and I’ve even gotten ads on homework websites. Once JUUL hit the Minnesota market, I saw firsthand vaping take off like wildfire among my peers and classmates. However, what enables their corporate success is one key ingredient: the flavoring. Most kids I know who vape do it for that reason--and then subsequently get addicted. Last summer, I assembled a diverse team of students to help draft and advocate for legislation requiring vaping education in schools. We worked with Edina representative Heather Edelson in order to actualize our proposals, which were to mandate education surrounding vaping in all Minnesota middle schools. Through the process of consulting with interest groups and hundreds of teachers, students, principals, and superintendents across the state, we found a vast deficit in education surrounding vaping. In turn, we built a coalition of state-wide educators and students alike to support this piece of legislation as a crucial first step. Our proposal was included in the Omnibus Education Bill passed by the House during the final seconds of the 2020 Session, and we’re hoping the Senate will ratify the bill when they return to a Special Session later this month. This education-focused proposal was one piece of a multi-layered approach to tackle youth vaping. We also advocated for Tobacco 21 and a ban on the sale of all flavored tobacco products. The statewide flavor ban bill passed through a number of committees in the House before the COVID-19 crisis hit. I’ll be back at the Capitol next Session advocating for the bill. But as you know, and as I saw with my own eyes this year, the wheels of change move slowly in St. Paul. That is why, once again, I am so proud of our community for leading the way. We’re not going to wait. Please move this proposal forward tonight and let’s prohibit the sale of all flavored tobacco products in Edina. If we let this problem proliferate unchecked, we will soon have a generation-wide public health crisis. If we do not spend on this issue now, we will bear a far greater cost in the future. Thank you for standing against the vaping industry and taking the fun out of vaping. City of Edina Correspondence Submission If you are leaving comments for a public hearing being heard by Council or the Planning Commission, go to https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/public-hearings Correspondence Selection * Data Practices Advisory: Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all City Council Members and submitted for inclusion in the next public “Council packet.” Council packets are permanent records of materials prepared for City Council meetings. Council packets are public documents that are available in print, published on the City’s website and maintained in permanent electronic records. You are not required to complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name and street or email address, your comments will not be included in the Council packet. Open Meeting Law City Council Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Council Members cannot engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum of three or more members. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You might also receive a response from a City staff member. Email City Council: If you only want to email the City Council and not send your comments for publishing, contact members at CityCouncil@EdinaMN.gov. Contact Executive Assistant Jennifer Garske, at JGarske@EdinaMN.gov, if you have any questions or require assistance. Council Packet Deadline Correspondence must be received by noon the Friday prior to a City Council meeting in order to ensure it is published in the packet prior to the Council meeting. Submissions after that time may be included in a future Council packet. Name * Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Comments * File Upload Mayor & City Council Eileen McAwley and Stacy O’REILLY 5504 Glengarry Pkwy Edina MN 55436 9522234020 no dashes or spaces emcawley@yahoo.com I support the new cell tower at Highlands Park. Having volunteered up at the highlands elementary school for five years I experienced no cell service while I was inside the building. I consider this a public safety issue. Many times I have to leave my house and go out on the front lawn to use my cell phone because the service is so weak. Please approve the enhancement to the cell tower. Thank you. Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above. City of Edina Correspondence Submission If you are leaving comments for a public hearing being heard by Council or the Planning Commission, go to https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/public-hearings Correspondence Selection * Data Practices Advisory: Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all City Council Members and submitted for inclusion in the next public “Council packet.” Council packets are permanent records of materials prepared for City Council meetings. Council packets are public documents that are available in print, published on the City’s website and maintained in permanent electronic records. You are not required to complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name and street or email address, your comments will not be included in the Council packet. Open Meeting Law City Council Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Council Members cannot engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum of three or more members. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You might also receive a response from a City staff member. Email City Council: If you only want to email the City Council and not send your comments for publishing, contact members at CityCouncil@EdinaMN.gov. Contact Executive Assistant Jennifer Garske, at JGarske@EdinaMN.gov, if you have any questions or require assistance. Council Packet Deadline Correspondence must be received by noon the Friday prior to a City Council meeting in order to ensure it is published in the packet prior to the Council meeting. Submissions after that time may be included in a future Council packet. Name * Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Comments * File Upload By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above. Mayor & City Council Courtney Muehlbauer 5505 Glengarry Parkway Edina MN 55436 6128390199 no dashes or spaces courtneymuehlbauer@gmail.com I support enhancing the cell tower in Highlands Park. I work at Highlands Elementary School and many people can not get cell phone service in the building. That is extremely unsafe in an emergency situation. Emergencies with our children should always override aesthetics! Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png City of Edina Correspondence Submission If you are leaving comments for a public hearing being heard by Council or the Planning Commission, go to https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/public-hearings Correspondence Selection * Data Practices Advisory: Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all City Council Members and submitted for inclusion in the next public “Council packet.” Council packets are permanent records of materials prepared for City Council meetings. Council packets are public documents that are available in print, published on the City’s website and maintained in permanent electronic records. You are not required to complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name and street or email address, your comments will not be included in the Council packet. Open Meeting Law City Council Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Council Members cannot engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum of three or more members. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You might also receive a response from a City staff member. Email City Council: If you only want to email the City Council and not send your comments for publishing, contact members at CityCouncil@EdinaMN.gov. Contact Executive Assistant Jennifer Garske, at JGarske@EdinaMN.gov, if you have any questions or require assistance. Council Packet Deadline Correspondence must be received by noon the Friday prior to a City Council meeting in order to ensure it is published in the packet prior to the Council meeting. Submissions after that time may be included in a future Council packet. Name * Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Comments * Mayor & City Council Linda Muehlbauer 5505 Glengarry Parkway Edina Mn 55436 no dashes or spaces lmuehlbauer@me.com I support enhancing the cell tower in Highlands Park. Cell service in our neighborhood is intermittent and spotty. We need to make sure all citizens in the neighborhood can use cell phones for emergencies as well as work and personal calls. I understand we already have a cell tower in the park. This should cause very little change while helping everyone in the neighborhood. City of Edina Correspondence Submission If you are leaving comments for a public hearing being heard by Council or the Planning Commission, go to https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/public-hearings Correspondence Selection * Data Practices Advisory: Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all City Council Members and submitted for inclusion in the next public “Council packet.” Council packets are permanent records of materials prepared for City Council meetings. Council packets are public documents that are available in print, published on the City’s website and maintained in permanent electronic records. You are not required to complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name and street or email address, your comments will not be included in the Council packet. Open Meeting Law City Council Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Council Members cannot engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum of three or more members. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You might also receive a response from a City staff member. Email City Council: If you only want to email the City Council and not send your comments for publishing, contact members at CityCouncil@EdinaMN.gov. Contact Executive Assistant Jennifer Garske, at JGarske@EdinaMN.gov, if you have any questions or require assistance. Council Packet Deadline Correspondence must be received by noon the Friday prior to a City Council meeting in order to ensure it is published in the packet prior to the Council meeting. Submissions after that time may be included in a future Council packet. Name * Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Comments * File Upload By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above. Mayor & City Council Emily Myatt 950 Blue Gentian Rd Ste 100 Eagan MN 55121 6512558156 no dashes or spaces emily.myatt@cancer.org Attached is a letter from the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, the non-profit, non-partisan advocacy affiliate of the American Cancer Society, in support of the proposed ordinance to end the sale of all flavored tobacco products. Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png ACS CAN Edina Flavored Tobacco LOS.pdf 118.91KB File Upload By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above. Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png June 2, 2020 Mayor James Hovland Edina City Council 4801 W 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland and Members of the Edina City Council, On behalf of the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network (ACS CAN), I want to express our support for the proposed ordinance to end the sale of all flavored tobacco products in Edina, including menthol cigarettes, flavored cigars, e-cigarettes, hookah, and smokeless tobacco. For years, tobacco use has been the number one preventable cause of death in our country and our state. Smoking kills over 6,000 Minnesotans each year and costs the state more than $3 billion annually in excess health care costs. In fact, tobacco use costs every Minnesotan $593. Despite this, we continue to let the tobacco industry market their deadly products and addict young people. The tobacco industry has designed products such as cherry chewing tobacco, menthol cigarettes, strawberry kiwi cigarillos, and cotton candy e-cigarettes to get children addicted and keep them as customers throughout their life. 80% of kids who have ever used tobacco start with a flavored product. Candy and fruit flavored tobacco products mask the harsh taste of tobacco and are often incorrectly perceived by youth to be “safer.” The use of flavored tobacco products, including menthol cigarettes, can lead to cancer, heart disease and chronic pulmonary disease. The tobacco industry targets young people, the LGBTQ community, and African Americans with menthol-flavored tobacco products. Tobacco companies add menthol to tobacco products to cool the throat and make them taste better. Menthol cigarettes make it easier to start smoking and harder to stop. What’s more, flavored e-cigarettes have reversed the decades of progress Minnesota has made in reducing youth tobacco use. Flavors play a major role in the high rates of youth and young adult use of e-cigarettes. There are more than 15,000 flavors on the market. 72% of young adult e-cigarette users never smoked cigarettes, yet kids who use e- cigarettes are more likely to smoke cigarettes in the future. 44% of adult e-cigarette users never smoked cigarettes. E- cigarettes are not approved as cessation devices by the FDA and are not proven to be better for quitting than evidence- based cessation programs. What’s more, we know the aerosol from e-cigarettes can contain nicotine, ultrafine particles, flavoring such as diacetyl, which is linked to a serious lung disease, cancer-causing chemicals, volatile organic compounds, and heavy metals. Flavored e-cigarettes are used to target kids and young people and lure them into addiction. The dangers of flavored tobacco do not just start and end with electronic cigarettes. By ending the sale of all flavored tobacco products, including menthol cigarettes, flavored cigars, hookah, and smokeless tobacco, you are acting to protect the health of Edina children and residents. The tobacco industry will have one less tool to lure new, young users into addiction. Edina led the way on raising the tobacco sales age to 21, and we hope Edina will continue to be a leader when it comes to youth tobacco prevention and smart public health policies. Thank you for considering this important policy. Sincerely, Emily Myatt Minnesota Government Relations Director American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network 950 Blue Gentian Rd. Ste. 100 Eagan, MN 55121 City of Edina Correspondence Submission If you are leaving comments for a public hearing being heard by Council or the Planning Commission, go to https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/public-hearings Correspondence Selection * Data Practices Advisory: Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all City Council Members and submitted for inclusion in the next public “Council packet.” Council packets are permanent records of materials prepared for City Council meetings. Council packets are public documents that are available in print, published on the City’s website and maintained in permanent electronic records. You are not required to complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name and street or email address, your comments will not be included in the Council packet. Open Meeting Law City Council Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Council Members cannot engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum of three or more members. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You might also receive a response from a City staff member. Email City Council: If you only want to email the City Council and not send your comments for publishing, contact members at CityCouncil@EdinaMN.gov. Contact Executive Assistant Jennifer Garske, at JGarske@EdinaMN.gov, if you have any questions or require assistance. Council Packet Deadline Correspondence must be received by noon the Friday prior to a City Council meeting in order to ensure it is published in the packet prior to the Council meeting. Submissions after that time may be included in a future Council packet. Name * Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Mayor & City Council Hope Melton 4825 Valley View Road Edina MN 55424 5187277553 no dashes or spaces hopemelton@hotmail.com Comments * File Upload By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above. Thank you for your positive reception of the single family homes proposal made at the council work session last Tuesday night. As you acknowledged, these proposals enable the City to expand its inventory of affordable homes, both single family owned and rentals, broadening the spectrum of affordability for diverse households needing different types of housing. We would encourage you to approve twin homes, if possible, on the Duggan Plaza property including a variance and without restrictions to any particular population (i. e. veterans). With affordable housing in Edina it's the more, the better. Finally, I also want to commend the work of our Affordable Housing Development Manager Stephanie Hawkinson. These proposals were innovative in conception, financing, and collaboration with other housing agencies and the Housing Foundation. We look forward to working with you in support of more single family affordable homes in Edina! Respectfully, Hope Melton Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png City of Edina Correspondence Submission If you are leaving comments for a public hearing being heard by Council or the Planning Commission, go to https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/public-hearings Correspondence Selection * Data Practices Advisory: Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all City Council Members and submitted for inclusion in the next public “Council packet.” Council packets are permanent records of materials prepared for City Council meetings. Council packets are public documents that are available in print, published on the City’s website and maintained in permanent electronic records. You are not required to complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name and street or email address, your comments will not be included in the Council packet. Open Meeting Law City Council Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Council Members cannot engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum of three or more members. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You might also receive a response from a City staff member. Email City Council: If you only want to email the City Council and not send your comments for publishing, contact members at CityCouncil@EdinaMN.gov. Contact Executive Assistant Jennifer Garske, at JGarske@EdinaMN.gov, if you have any questions or require assistance. Council Packet Deadline Correspondence must be received by noon the Friday prior to a City Council meeting in order to ensure it is published in the packet prior to the Council meeting. Submissions after that time may be included in a future Council packet. Name * Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Mayor & City Council Thomas C Koon 4410 Grimes Ave Edina MN 55424 9522702779 no dashes or spaces tckoon@comcast.net Comments * File Upload By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above. Please see my full statement attached. I support the three proposals to increase the number of affordable family size housing units in Edina. In particular, these three proposals are a response to the out pouring of anger we have seen around the country regarding racial inequality toward the African-American community and Edina's efforts at being inclusive. Please note the Black population of Edina has dropped significantly per the recent Maxfield study. I also support the development of a Twin Home on the Duggan site from both an environmental and affordable housing stance. Again please see my full statement and justifications attached. Thomas Koon Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png Support of 3 Housing Proposals.pdf 222.57KB Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members: I am giving my support to the proposal for three efforts to provide more affordable housing for families in Edina. These proposed actions would bring more opportunities for diversity to Edina that the City Council has endorsed in various documents. From the Maxfield Study of April 2020, commissioned by the council; the Black population of Edina dropped by 415 or 30% from 1424 to 1009 individuals between 2010 and 2019 per pages 35 and 36 of the report. As we have seen the outpouring of anger in our metro area recently, we must as a community take steps to make real and constructive changes in a wide variety of public arenas that shape our lives including more opportunities. 1. Duggan Plaza: This city owned lot should accommodate a twin home or side-by-side duplex serving two families. As seen in other communities, the designed could appear as one large home with placement of doors and windows on the front façade to blend in with the area. A twin home could offer two families an opportunity for affordable housing. It would be a more efficient use of scarce land reducing per unit infrastructure and land costs while maintaining a low-density family style housing structure. Better use of this plot will also in a small way reduce urban sprawl in the greater metro area. I grew up in a similar structure mixed in with single-family homes owned by my family. We always felt as fully equal and contributing members of the community. When I purchased my home in Edina, there was a building designed and used as a duplex across the street with an extended family occupying both units. The family were full members of the neighborhood. Unfortunately, the two units were lost due to a teardown 2. Single family ownership revolving loan program: I support the $1M out of Trust Fund dollars to set up a revolving loan program for the West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust. 3. Single family rental program: I support the expansion of affordable rental housing owned and managed through the Metro HRA. Three or four bedroom housing units are the most difficult affordable housing to find. Using an existing structure will allow for an easier integration for future families who reside in the housing. This would be a wise use of Southdale 2 TIF pooled funds for the acquisition of 3 houses that will be leased to Metro HRA to maintain and manage. From my professional experience, the Metro Council HRA has been a solid partner in providing affordable housing opportunities and a good neighbor. Thomas Koon 4410 Grimes Avenue Edina, MN 55424 City of Edina Correspondence Submission If you are leaving comments for a public hearing being heard by Council or the Planning Commission, go to https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/public-hearings Correspondence Selection * Data Practices Advisory: Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all City Council Members and submitted for inclusion in the next public “Council packet.” Council packets are permanent records of materials prepared for City Council meetings. Council packets are public documents that are available in print, published on the City’s website and maintained in permanent electronic records. You are not required to complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name and street or email address, your comments will not be included in the Council packet. Open Meeting Law City Council Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Council Members cannot engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum of three or more members. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You might also receive a response from a City staff member. Email City Council: If you only want to email the City Council and not send your comments for publishing, contact members at CityCouncil@EdinaMN.gov. Contact Executive Assistant Jennifer Garske, at JGarske@EdinaMN.gov, if you have any questions or require assistance. Council Packet Deadline Correspondence must be received by noon the Friday prior to a City Council meeting in order to ensure it is published in the packet prior to the Council meeting. Submissions after that time may be included in a future Council packet. Name * Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Comments * Mayor & City Council Robert Freeman 8170 33rd Ave Bloomington MN 55425 no dashes or spaces robert.a.freeman@healthpartners.com Please see attached letter from our medical director, Dr. Thomas Kottke M.D., in support of the tobacco flavoring ordinance. I would appreciate it if you would share it with the mayor and city council at the upcoming hearing. Please feel free to contact me with any questions. Robert Freeman Manager Government Relations File Upload By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above. Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png HealthPartners Letter to Edina flavors.pdf 230.89KB HealthPartners 8170 33rd Avenue South Bloomington, MN 55425 healthpartners.com Mailing Address: PO Box 1309 Minneapolis, MN 55440-1309 June 5, 2020 Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland and Edina City Councilmembers: On behalf of the 25,000 employees at HealthPartners, nearly 500 of whom are proud to live in the city of Edina, we want to express our strong support for the proposed city ordinance to restrict the sale of flavored tobacco products. It is HealthPartners’ mission to improve health and well-being in partnership with our members, patients and the community. The city of Edina led in 2017 with its work to protect children from the harm of tobacco and this decision in your city to be the first Tobacco-21 community led to a movement in Minnesota that culminated with a bipartisan bill being signed by President Trump to enforce this nationwide. Approximately 95 percent of adult smokers started before they were 21. For years tobacco use has been the number one preventable cause of death in our country and our state. Smoking costs the state more than $3 billion annually in excess health care costs and each year more than 6,000 Minnesotans die from tobacco-related diseases. The next step we must take is to restrict the use of flavored tobacco products. The majority of high-school tobacco users use flavored tobacco, and menthol in particular has long been used as a tool to lure people of color and the LGBTQ community into starting smoking. The federal government has failed to address the threat posed by these flavored products. Weak federal rules still allow Big Tobacco to sell kid-friendly menthol, candy and fruit flavors. By prohibiting the sale of flavored tobacco products, Edina can strike another blow to help reduce tobacco use in our community and reduce harm to our children and vulnerable communities. Sincerely, Dr. Thomas Kottke, M.D. HealthPartners Medical Director, Well-being City of Edina Correspondence Submission If you are leaving comments for a public hearing being heard by Council or the Planning Commission, go to https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/public-hearings Correspondence Selection * Data Practices Advisory: Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all City Council Members and submitted for inclusion in the next public “Council packet.” Council packets are permanent records of materials prepared for City Council meetings. Council packets are public documents that are available in print, published on the City’s website and maintained in permanent electronic records. You are not required to complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name and street or email address, your comments will not be included in the Council packet. Open Meeting Law City Council Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Council Members cannot engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum of three or more members. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You might also receive a response from a City staff member. Email City Council: If you only want to email the City Council and not send your comments for publishing, contact members at CityCouncil@EdinaMN.gov. Contact Executive Assistant Jennifer Garske, at JGarske@EdinaMN.gov, if you have any questions or require assistance. Council Packet Deadline Correspondence must be received by noon the Friday prior to a City Council meeting in order to ensure it is published in the packet prior to the Council meeting. Submissions after that time may be included in a future Council packet. Name * Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Mayor & City Council Anthony Nderu 6670 Vernon Avenue South, 202 Edina MN 55436 6127470279 no dashes or spaces anthony.nderu@gmail.com Comments * File Upload By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above. Addressing Racisim in Edina. Good Afternoon, I am a black man – US citizen who has lived in Edina for about 11 years. I have heard from the community Edina Police are known to have a reputation of being racist. Their was a case in the news paper where Police stopped a young black man for no reason . I noticed our sister city of Minnetonka is having conversations of how they can address what is happening in Minneapolis. What can we do to change the Edina Police racism narrative. How can we root out racism in our community. When you are previlaged because of your color, its important to listen to those who are not so previlaged in your community. Lets make our community safer. We have heard of some stories in Edina and we hope we too can address this issue. My biggest fear in Edina is the police. It might be good for you to hear that however public safety is about community and not fear of being killed or hurt unnecessarily Lets not bury our heads in t Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png City of Edina Correspondence Submission If you are leaving comments for a public hearing being heard by Council or the Planning Commission, go to https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/public-hearings Correspondence Selection * Data Practices Advisory: Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all City Council Members and submitted for inclusion in the next public “Council packet.” Council packets are permanent records of materials prepared for City Council meetings. Council packets are public documents that are available in print, published on the City’s website and maintained in permanent electronic records. You are not required to complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name and street or email address, your comments will not be included in the Council packet. Open Meeting Law City Council Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Council Members cannot engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum of three or more members. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You might also receive a response from a City staff member. Email City Council: If you only want to email the City Council and not send your comments for publishing, contact members at CityCouncil@EdinaMN.gov. Contact Executive Assistant Jennifer Garske, at JGarske@EdinaMN.gov, if you have any questions or require assistance. Council Packet Deadline Correspondence must be received by noon the Friday prior to a City Council meeting in order to ensure it is published in the packet prior to the Council meeting. Submissions after that time may be included in a future Council packet. Name * Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Comments * File Upload By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above. Mayor & City Council Monica Deming no dashes or spaces I am a resident of Highlands and frequent user of the park space. I oppose the newly proposed 5G tower and its placement given the size and visibility to the park space. Please find an alternative spot for this tower. Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png City of Edina Correspondence Submission If you are leaving comments for a public hearing being heard by Council or the Planning Commission, go to https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/public-hearings Correspondence Selection * Data Practices Advisory: Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all City Council Members and submitted for inclusion in the next public “Council packet.” Council packets are permanent records of materials prepared for City Council meetings. Council packets are public documents that are available in print, published on the City’s website and maintained in permanent electronic records. You are not required to complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name and street or email address, your comments will not be included in the Council packet. Open Meeting Law City Council Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Council Members cannot engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum of three or more members. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You might also receive a response from a City staff member. Email City Council: If you only want to email the City Council and not send your comments for publishing, contact members at CityCouncil@EdinaMN.gov. Contact Executive Assistant Jennifer Garske, at JGarske@EdinaMN.gov, if you have any questions or require assistance. Council Packet Deadline Correspondence must be received by noon the Friday prior to a City Council meeting in order to ensure it is published in the packet prior to the Council meeting. Submissions after that time may be included in a future Council packet. Name * Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Mayor & City Council Adam Scoll Edina MN 55436 6125328221 no dashes or spaces adscoll@gmail.com Comments * File Upload By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above. Dear Mayor Hovland and Edina City Council Members, I was happy to learn that once again our community is leading the way on reducing youth tobacco use. As a parent of small children, I fully support the proposal to prohibit the sale of all flavored tobacco products in Edina. As youth vaping rates continue to increase, we can and must do more. Can I count on you to vote in favor of this lifesaving policy? Thank you. Adam Scoll Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png City of Edina Correspondence Submission If you are leaving comments for a public hearing being heard by Council or the Planning Commission, go to https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/public-hearings Correspondence Selection * Data Practices Advisory: Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all City Council Members and submitted for inclusion in the next public “Council packet.” Council packets are permanent records of materials prepared for City Council meetings. Council packets are public documents that are available in print, published on the City’s website and maintained in permanent electronic records. You are not required to complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name and street or email address, your comments will not be included in the Council packet. Open Meeting Law City Council Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Council Members cannot engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum of three or more members. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You might also receive a response from a City staff member. Email City Council: If you only want to email the City Council and not send your comments for publishing, contact members at CityCouncil@EdinaMN.gov. Contact Executive Assistant Jennifer Garske, at JGarske@EdinaMN.gov, if you have any questions or require assistance. Council Packet Deadline Correspondence must be received by noon the Friday prior to a City Council meeting in order to ensure it is published in the packet prior to the Council meeting. Submissions after that time may be included in a future Council packet. Name * Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Comments * File Upload By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above. Mayor & City Council Marilyn Sharpe 6501 Cherokee Trail Edina MN 55439 6122028152 no dashes or spaces marilynsharpeministries@comcast.net Please include this letter that I have sent to the mayor and all city council members in their meeting packet for the discussion of not selling flavored tobacco in the city of Edina. Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png Letter to Edina City Council Members.pdf 21.3KB Dear Mayor Hovland and Edina City Council Members, My beloved father, born in 1921, died at age 59 of a kidney cancer caused by his cigarette smoking, which he quit at age 40. His parents lived to be 87 and 90, but didn’t smoke. He started smoking at age 16, when he enrolled at the U of MN and thought it made him look older. Missing more than 30 years with his family, friends, and community was a horrifying loss. I don’t want that for any of the youth we care about. As a proud 42 year resident of Edina, I am thrilled that once again our community is leading the way on reducing youth tobacco use. I fully support the proposal to prohibit the sale of all flavored tobacco products in Edina. As youth vaping rates continue to increase, we can and must do more. Can I count on you to vote in favor of this lifesaving policy? Thank you. Blessings, Marilyn Sharpe MarilynSharpeMinistries@comcast.net 6501 Cherokee Trail Edina, MN 55439 612-202-8152 www.MarilynSharpeMinistries.com City of Edina Correspondence Submission If you are leaving comments for a public hearing being heard by Council or the Planning Commission, go to https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/public-hearings Correspondence Selection * Data Practices Advisory: Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all City Council Members and submitted for inclusion in the next public “Council packet.” Council packets are permanent records of materials prepared for City Council meetings. Council packets are public documents that are available in print, published on the City’s website and maintained in permanent electronic records. You are not required to complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name and street or email address, your comments will not be included in the Council packet. Open Meeting Law City Council Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Council Members cannot engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum of three or more members. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You might also receive a response from a City staff member. Email City Council: If you only want to email the City Council and not send your comments for publishing, contact members at CityCouncil@EdinaMN.gov. Contact Executive Assistant Jennifer Garske, at JGarske@EdinaMN.gov, if you have any questions or require assistance. Council Packet Deadline Correspondence must be received by noon the Friday prior to a City Council meeting in order to ensure it is published in the packet prior to the Council meeting. Submissions after that time may be included in a future Council packet. Name * Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Comments * Mayor & City Council Louann Waddick 5304 Blake Rd Edina Mn 55436 6127153158 no dashes or spaces lawaddick@gmail.com Dear Mayor Hovland and Edina City Council Members, I was excited to learn that once again our community is leading the way on reducing youth tobacco use. I fully support the proposal to prohibit the sale of all flavored tobacco products in Edina. As youth vaping rates continue to increase, we can and must do more. I hope that you will vote in favor of this lifesaving policy. Thank you. File Upload By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above. Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png City of Edina Correspondence Submission If you are leaving comments for a public hearing being heard by Council or the Planning Commission, go to https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/public-hearings Correspondence Selection * Data Practices Advisory: Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all City Council Members and submitted for inclusion in the next public “Council packet.” Council packets are permanent records of materials prepared for City Council meetings. Council packets are public documents that are available in print, published on the City’s website and maintained in permanent electronic records. You are not required to complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name and street or email address, your comments will not be included in the Council packet. Open Meeting Law City Council Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Council Members cannot engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum of three or more members. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You might also receive a response from a City staff member. Email City Council: If you only want to email the City Council and not send your comments for publishing, contact members at CityCouncil@EdinaMN.gov. Contact Executive Assistant Jennifer Garske, at JGarske@EdinaMN.gov, if you have any questions or require assistance. Council Packet Deadline Correspondence must be received by noon the Friday prior to a City Council meeting in order to ensure it is published in the packet prior to the Council meeting. Submissions after that time may be included in a future Council packet. Name * Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Comments * File Upload By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above. Mayor & City Council Roger Johnson 6566 France Av S Unit 707 Edina MN 55435 6127187493 no dashes or spaces northman5963@comcast.net I strongly support banning the sale of all flavored tobacco products in Edina. It is vital that this ban take effect as soon as possible. The health of our young people is at risk as long as these products are available. Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png City of Edina Correspondence Submission If you are leaving comments for a public hearing being heard by Council or the Planning Commission, go to https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/public-hearings Correspondence Selection * Data Practices Advisory: Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all Board or Commission members. You are not required to complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name, street address or your email address, your comments will not be sent to the Board or Commission members. Open Meeting Law Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Members cannot engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You might also receive a response from a City staff member. Name * Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Community Health Commission Thomas Wilson 4519 Casco Avenue Edina MN 55424 6128171361 no dashes or spaces tom.wilson55@gmail.com Comments * File Upload By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above. Tom Wilson <tom.wilson55@gmail.com> 2:32 PM (2 minutes ago) to RAnderson, MBrindle, MFischer, jhovland@EdinaMN.gov, KStaunton, Heather, bcc: me Dear Mayor Hovland and Edina City Council Members, I was excited to learn that once again our community is leading the way on reducing youth tobacco use. State Representative Heather Edelson has been a force in Edina’s effort to become the first city in Minnesota to raise the tobacco sales age to 21. I fully support the proposal to prohibit the sale of all flavored tobacco products in Edina. As youth vaping rates continue to increase, we can and must do more. I am counting on you to vote in favor of this life saving policy. Thank you. Sincerely, Tom Wilson 4519 Casco Ave, Edina, MN 55424 Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png City of Edina Correspondence Submission If you are leaving comments for a public hearing being heard by Council or the Planning Commission, go to https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/public-hearings Correspondence Selection * Data Practices Advisory: Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all City Council Members and submitted for inclusion in the next public “Council packet.” Council packets are permanent records of materials prepared for City Council meetings. Council packets are public documents that are available in print, published on the City’s website and maintained in permanent electronic records. You are not required to complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name and street or email address, your comments will not be included in the Council packet. Open Meeting Law City Council Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Council Members cannot engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum of three or more members. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You might also receive a response from a City staff member. Email City Council: If you only want to email the City Council and not send your comments for publishing, contact members at CityCouncil@EdinaMN.gov. Contact Executive Assistant Jennifer Garske, at JGarske@EdinaMN.gov, if you have any questions or require assistance. Council Packet Deadline Correspondence must be received by noon the Friday prior to a City Council meeting in order to ensure it is published in the packet prior to the Council meeting. Submissions after that time may be included in a future Council packet. Name * Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Comments * File Upload By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above. Mayor & City Council Bethlehem Yewhalawork 398 Minnesota Ave Roseville MN 55113 7632225477 no dashes or spaces byewhalawork@npimn.org Please find a letter in support of the city of Edina's proposed changes to the tobacco ordinance. Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png Edina LOS.pdf 152.94KB June 9, 2020 Edina City Hall 4801 W 50th St, Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland and Members of the Edina City Council, In 2015, a group of more than 50 health and community organizations came together to form the Menthol Coalition. Our goal was to take local action to protect communities across our state from the harms of menthol tobacco. The menthol coalition strongly supports your efforts to strengthen Edina’s tobacco ordinance by prohibiting the sale of all flavored tobacco products including mint, mentol and wintergreen flavors. If we can stop youth from starting, then we can save many lives, for generations to come. Thank you for supporting banning fruit and candy flavored tobacco products, including cigars, chew and e-cigarettes/e-juice. These products come in a wide range of kid-friendly flavors, from grape and cotton candy to Skittles and Sour Patch Kids. The tobacco industry knows that most youth who use tobacco are using flavored products. That's because the sweet flavors mask the harshness of tobacco. We applaud your bold stance in including menthol in your ban of flavored tobacco and e- cigarettes. Menthol is not just another flavor, it is THE money making flavor for the tobacco industry. They have spent decades marketing menthol tobacco to the African American and LGBTQ communities. As a result, 88% of African American adults who smoke use menthol products, compared to 25% of adult smokers overall. Menthol masks the harshness of smoke and studies show that the tobacco industry has manipulated menthol levels to attract younger smokers. Curbing menthol use and preventing young people from ever picking up the deadly habit is one of the most impactful ways we can reduce health disparities in the communities we serve. Prohibiting the sale of all flavored tobacco products, including mint and menthol will make a tremendous difference in assuring that youth aren’t able to access these deadly products and set themselves up for a lifetime of addiction and disease. We urge Edina to continue promoting a healthy community by keeping tobacco products out of the hands of our children. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, LaTrisha Vetaw Website: BeautifulLieUglyTruth.org Phone Number: 612-767-9193 Mailing Address: 1256 Penn Avenue N. Minneapolis, MN 55411 City of Edina Correspondence Submission If you are leaving comments for a public hearing being heard by Council or the Planning Commission, go to https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/public-hearings Correspondence Selection * Data Practices Advisory: Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all City Council Members and submitted for inclusion in the next public “Council packet.” Council packets are permanent records of materials prepared for City Council meetings. Council packets are public documents that are available in print, published on the City’s website and maintained in permanent electronic records. You are not required to complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name and street or email address, your comments will not be included in the Council packet. Open Meeting Law City Council Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Council Members cannot engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum of three or more members. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You might also receive a response from a City staff member. Email City Council: If you only want to email the City Council and not send your comments for publishing, contact members at CityCouncil@EdinaMN.gov. Contact Executive Assistant Jennifer Garske, at JGarske@EdinaMN.gov, if you have any questions or require assistance. Council Packet Deadline Correspondence must be received by noon the Friday prior to a City Council meeting in order to ensure it is published in the packet prior to the Council meeting. Submissions after that time may be included in a future Council packet. Name * Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Mayor & City Council David Spotts 1715 W 31st Street Minneapolis MN 55408 9524121976 no dashes or spaces dssjrf@gmail.com Comments * File Upload By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above. I recently moved to work in a 50th/France business and sought information for that parking structure. I was given pause by the high price and worse the final comment that read, "No parking is free". I worked in Wayzata for the last 4 1/2 years and parked in their multi-level structure for no cost to me! So, there indeed is such a thing! Signed, Find Me Parked Freely On The Street Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png City of Edina Correspondence Submission If you are leaving comments for a public hearing being heard by Council or the Planning Commission, go to https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/public-hearings Correspondence Selection * Data Practices Advisory: Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all City Council Members and submitted for inclusion in the next public “Council packet.” Council packets are permanent records of materials prepared for City Council meetings. Council packets are public documents that are available in print, published on the City’s website and maintained in permanent electronic records. You are not required to complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name and street or email address, your comments will not be included in the Council packet. Open Meeting Law City Council Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Council Members cannot engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum of three or more members. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You might also receive a response from a City staff member. Email City Council: If you only want to email the City Council and not send your comments for publishing, contact members at CityCouncil@EdinaMN.gov. Contact Executive Assistant Jennifer Garske, at JGarske@EdinaMN.gov, if you have any questions or require assistance. Council Packet Deadline Correspondence must be received by noon the Friday prior to a City Council meeting in order to ensure it is published in the packet prior to the Council meeting. Submissions after that time may be included in a future Council packet. Name * Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Comments * File Upload By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above. Mayor & City Council Cindy Anderson 5201 Doncaster Way Edina MN 55436 9522405077 no dashes or spaces cindya07@yahoo.com Please see the attached PDF. Thank you. Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png Cell Phone Tower .pdf 23.58KB I am writing to express my concerns regarding the variance granted by the Edina Planning Commission which would allow a new cell tower to be built at 5200 Doncaster Way in Highlands Park. I am opposed to this variance. My residence at 5201 Doncaster Way is adjacent to the park. The proposed variance is not for a few feet, it is for more than half of the setback required for such a structure. I have many concerns about the proposal. It was represented that there had been a two year study to determine the best location for a tower to improve cell service in this area. However, during the discussion at the June 2 council meeting, the Crown Castle representative was not familiar with where Highlands School is located and could not specifically answer some other questions posed about alternative locations for the tower. If the area was so thoroughly investigated, it seems information such as this should have been very familiar to the investigator or someone familiar with the investigation's findings. For example, what other sites were considered...could coverage be enhanced further from another location? If basic information such as this is unfamiliar to the company's representative, who appeared as a purported expert on the proposal, the completeness and accuracy of the investigation seems discredited. The Highlands Park area is a relatively "low" area elevation wise with mature growing trees surrounding it. This contributes to the need for a 75' tower to achieve viability. If the tower were placed on more elevated land or structure, it would not need to be this tall. The tower is "unsightly" and not cohesive with the natural setting of the park. Also, the current warming house does not have capacity to house the ground equipment needed for Verizon. Another structure needs to be built near the woods to hold this, further disrupting the park's environment. 5G technology is relatively new. When reading about the subject one can find many credible scientific sources who feel there are potential health risks to humans as well as plants and animals. It is not uncommon for technologies and products to have unintended consequences that are not apparent initially. The corporations behind them promote their products/services without full knowledge of long term effects. There have been numerous examples of this in our lifetimes...tobacco being one that it is difficult to argue against. I question the completeness and accuracy of the 5/29/2020 MIN Daisy report from Verizon. The incorrect grammar on the Overview page makes me suspect of some of the content and completeness of the study. The coverage maps beg some questions as well. I know Verizon calls are often dropped or "garbled" when users drive east on Vernon from the Parkwood Knolls area. This coverage map does not seem to indicate that shortcoming. I presume there was careful thought, discussion and good reasoning for the establishment of the setback requirements for such structures when they were adopted by the city. I don't feel it is right to so easily discard this established requirement when there are so many valid concerns from residents. Respectfully, Cindy Anderson 5201 Doncaster Way Edina City of Edina Correspondence Submission If you are leaving comments for a public hearing being heard by Council or the Planning Commission, go to https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/public-hearings Correspondence Selection * Data Practices Advisory: Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all City Council Members and submitted for inclusion in the next public “Council packet.” Council packets are permanent records of materials prepared for City Council meetings. Council packets are public documents that are available in print, published on the City’s website and maintained in permanent electronic records. You are not required to complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name and street or email address, your comments will not be included in the Council packet. Open Meeting Law City Council Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Council Members cannot engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum of three or more members. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You might also receive a response from a City staff member. Email City Council: If you only want to email the City Council and not send your comments for publishing, contact members at CityCouncil@EdinaMN.gov. Contact Executive Assistant Jennifer Garske, at JGarske@EdinaMN.gov, if you have any questions or require assistance. Council Packet Deadline Correspondence must be received by noon the Friday prior to a City Council meeting in order to ensure it is published in the packet prior to the Council meeting. Submissions after that time may be included in a future Council packet. Name * Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Mayor & City Council Jeffrey & Margaret Hall 4500 Drexel Ave. Minneapolis Minnesota 55424 6128037677 no dashes or spaces jeffthall1@aol.com Comments * File Upload By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above. Dear Mayor Hovland and Edina City Council Members, We are very happy to see the Edina Community Health Commission submitted a proposal recommending the Council prohibit the sale of all flavored tobacco products in Edina. As youth vaping and marijuana use continue to increase, we must provide safe boundaries against the proliferation of market- and profit-driven schemes to entice youth into these harmful practices. We are grateful for your leadership on this critical health issue, and thank you for supporting this ban. Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png City of Edina Correspondence Submission If you are leaving comments for a public hearing being heard by Council or the Planning Commission, go to https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/public-hearings Correspondence Selection * Data Practices Advisory: Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all City Council Members and submitted for inclusion in the next public “Council packet.” Council packets are permanent records of materials prepared for City Council meetings. Council packets are public documents that are available in print, published on the City’s website and maintained in permanent electronic records. You are not required to complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name and street or email address, your comments will not be included in the Council packet. Open Meeting Law City Council Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Council Members cannot engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum of three or more members. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You might also receive a response from a City staff member. Email City Council: If you only want to email the City Council and not send your comments for publishing, contact members at CityCouncil@EdinaMN.gov. Contact Executive Assistant Jennifer Garske, at JGarske@EdinaMN.gov, if you have any questions or require assistance. Council Packet Deadline Correspondence must be received by noon the Friday prior to a City Council meeting in order to ensure it is published in the packet prior to the Council meeting. Submissions after that time may be included in a future Council packet. Name * Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Comments * Mayor & City Council Kelly Wolfe 5901 Lincoln Dr. Edina MN 55436 9529925497 no dashes or spaces kelly.wolfe@childrensmn.org On behalf of Children's Minnesota, I am attaching a letter of support for the local ordinance prohibiting the sale of flavored tobacco. If you have questions or would like additional information, please do not hesitate to reach out. Thank you for your consideration. File Upload By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above. Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png Edina Flavor Ban_DRAFT.pdf 74.65KB 5901 Lincoln Drive | Edina, MN 55436 | 952.992.5734 | childrensMN.org SENT VIA E-MAIL June 10, 2020 Dear Mayor Hovland and Council Members: On behalf of Children’s Minnesota, I am writing to urge you to support a local ordinance to prohibit the sales of flavored tobacco products in Edina. Children’s Minnesota is the state’s largest pediatric provider of health care. Last year, we saw over 135,000 patients; more than 1,400 of those patients were from Edina. Children’s Minnesota is also one of the state’s largest Medicaid providers with approximately forty-four percent of our patient population reported as Medicaid eligible in 2019. Children’s Minnesota is committed to promoting a healthier future for our kids and addressing systemic racism. Removing all flavored tobacco products from the marketplace furthers both these goals. We are deeply concerned about the rising rates of tobacco use among Minnesota youth and the persistent high rates of tobacco use among African Americans, American Indians, LGBTQ people and other diverse populations targeted by the tobacco industry. Candy and mint flavors are extremely attractive to children and young adults, and at these young ages they are especially vulnerable to addiction. Last year, experts at Children’s Minnesota found a cluster of cases of vaping-related severe lung injuries in teens and young adults. Despite these injuries and growing evidence of the health harms of e-cigarettes, thousands of flavored vapes remain on the market alongside flavored cigars and menthol tobacco products. Kids in Minnesota know that cigarettes are bad for them, but there is a huge misperception about the dangers of e-cigarettes and other flavored tobacco products. The 2019 Minnesota Student Survey found that 76 percent of Minnesota 11th-graders said there is “no, slight, or a moderate risk to using e-cigarettes.” That statistic shows we have a new generation of youth falling for the tobacco industry’s marketing. Research shows that flavored tobacco products are just are harmful and dangerous as their unflavored counterparts. In particular, menthol gives a cooling sensation and masks the harshness of tobacco, making it easier to start smoking and harder to quit, especially among African-American smokers. The tobacco industry has studied our kids and figured out how to target the next generation of customers. The industry knows that kids start with flavored products and then often move up to unflavored products. More than 80 percent of youth who ever tried tobacco reported starting with a flavored product, and youth who use e-cigarettes are more likely to go on to smoke combustible cigarettes in the future. Please support clearing the market of all flavored tobacco products in Edina, which will address tobacco-related health disparities and help our kids grow up free from addiction. Title continued … Page 2 Sincerely, Kelly Wolfe Director, Public Affairs and Advocacy Children’s Minnesota City of Edina Correspondence Submission If you are leaving comments for a public hearing being heard by Council or the Planning Commission, go to https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/public-hearings Correspondence Selection * Data Practices Advisory: Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all City Council Members and submitted for inclusion in the next public “Council packet.” Council packets are permanent records of materials prepared for City Council meetings. Council packets are public documents that are available in print, published on the City’s website and maintained in permanent electronic records. You are not required to complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name and street or email address, your comments will not be included in the Council packet. Open Meeting Law City Council Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Council Members cannot engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum of three or more members. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You might also receive a response from a City staff member. Email City Council: If you only want to email the City Council and not send your comments for publishing, contact members at CityCouncil@EdinaMN.gov. Contact Executive Assistant Jennifer Garske, at JGarske@EdinaMN.gov, if you have any questions or require assistance. Council Packet Deadline Correspondence must be received by noon the Friday prior to a City Council meeting in order to ensure it is published in the packet prior to the Council meeting. Submissions after that time may be included in a future Council packet. Name * Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Comments * File Upload By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above. Mayor & City Council Eugene M Nichols 5910 David Ct Shoreview MN 55126 6513432048 no dashes or spaces eugene.nichols@comcast.net Please find my support of the Tobacco ordinance attached. I appreciate your consideration. Gene Nichols Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png Edina Tobacco Ordinance 06102020.pdf 266.83KB Dear Mayor and City Council members, My name is Gene Nichols, and I’m the current Chairman of the Board at Open Cities Health Center St. Paul, an FQHC that serves insured, underinsured, and uninsured clients. I also serve on numerous health-related advisory committees at Ramsey County Public Health, and at MDH. I’m writing in support of the city’s proposed ordinance to ban the sale of all fruit- and candy-flavored tobacco products, as well as all mint- and menthol-flavored tobacco products. I want to thank you for including mint and menthol flavors in the flavor ban. I write to you today in honor of my brother, who lost his life two years ago at the age of 68 to COPD after smoking menthol cigarettes all of his teenage and adult life. The tobacco industry has been preying on marginalized communities for decades. This explains why the use of menthol among high school students has doubled since 2000. For example, 88% of African American smokers and 70% of LGBTQ youth smokers use menthol. Menthol masks the harshness of smoking, allowing the poison to go deeper into the lungs and making it easier to pick up smoking. It also makes it much harder to quit. Each new smoker and current smoker who can’t quit means dollar signs. The tobacco industry is making an enormous profit off menthol while our most vulnerable communities suffer from higher health disparities and the consequences of tobacco addiction. I am proud of the City of Edina for taking a strong stand against the tobacco industry and protecting our communities by including menthol in the flavor ban ordinance. You have the opportunity to join your Metro neighbors in supporting a healthier future for our community. Can I count on you to vote for this life-saving ordinance? Thank you for putting the health of your residents above tobacco industry profits. Thank you. Gene Nichols Board Chair Open Cities Health Center Eugene.nichols@comcast.net 651.343.2048 City of Edina Correspondence Submission If you are leaving comments for a public hearing being heard by Council or the Planning Commission, go to https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/public-hearings Correspondence Selection * Data Practices Advisory: Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all City Council Members and submitted for inclusion in the next public “Council packet.” Council packets are permanent records of materials prepared for City Council meetings. Council packets are public documents that are available in print, published on the City’s website and maintained in permanent electronic records. You are not required to complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name and street or email address, your comments will not be included in the Council packet. Open Meeting Law City Council Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Council Members cannot engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum of three or more members. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You might also receive a response from a City staff member. Email City Council: If you only want to email the City Council and not send your comments for publishing, contact members at CityCouncil@EdinaMN.gov. Contact Executive Assistant Jennifer Garske, at JGarske@EdinaMN.gov, if you have any questions or require assistance. Council Packet Deadline Correspondence must be received by noon the Friday prior to a City Council meeting in order to ensure it is published in the packet prior to the Council meeting. Submissions after that time may be included in a future Council packet. Name * Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Comments * File Upload Mayor & City Council Kristen Ackert Minneapolis Minnesota 55407 no dashes or spaces kristenlwerner@gmail.com Please see the attached letter in support of the proposed ordinance to prohibit the sale of flavored tobacco in Edina. Thank you for your leadership, Kristen Ackert Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png Support for prohibiting the sale of flavored tobacco in Edina.pdf 93.81KB By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above. City of Edina Correspondence Submission If you are leaving comments for a public hearing being heard by Council or the Planning Commission, go to https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/public-hearings Correspondence Selection * Data Practices Advisory: Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all City Council Members and submitted for inclusion in the next public “Council packet.” Council packets are permanent records of materials prepared for City Council meetings. Council packets are public documents that are available in print, published on the City’s website and maintained in permanent electronic records. You are not required to complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name and street or email address, your comments will not be included in the Council packet. Open Meeting Law City Council Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Council Members cannot engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum of three or more members. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You might also receive a response from a City staff member. Email City Council: If you only want to email the City Council and not send your comments for publishing, contact members at CityCouncil@EdinaMN.gov. Contact Executive Assistant Jennifer Garske, at JGarske@EdinaMN.gov, if you have any questions or require assistance. Council Packet Deadline Correspondence must be received by noon the Friday prior to a City Council meeting in order to ensure it is published in the packet prior to the Council meeting. Submissions after that time may be included in a future Council packet. Name * Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Comments * Mayor & City Council Cassandra Stepan 85 E 7th Place, PO Box 64882 St. Paul MN 55164 6512013665 no dashes or spaces cassandra.stepan@state.mn.us Please see attached letter regarding tobacco ordinance from Commissioner Jan Malcolm. Another internal email had been sent this morning. If you have any questions, please contact Cassandra Stepan cassandra.stepan@state.mn.us File Upload By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above. Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png MDH Letter_T21_Edina.pdf 112.38KB An equal opportunity employer. P rotecting, Maintaining and Improving the Health of All Minnesotans June 12, 2020 James Hovland, Mayor City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland and Council Members: As Commissioner of Health, I strongly support all the proposed restrictions, in particular limitations to the sale of menthol tobacco. The proposals will have a powerful deterrent effect on youth initiation, will reduce youth tobacco use, and protect youth from a lifetime of addiction. I am very concerned about the dramatic increases in youth use of e-cigarettes, cigars, and other tobacco products. According to the 2019 Minnesota Student Survey, students are using e-cigarettes at a rate five times that of conventional cigarettes. 8th grade e-cigarette use nearly doubled from 2016 to 2019, and one in four 11th graders now use e-cigarettes. The vast majority of youth enter into tobacco and nicotine use with a flavored tobacco product. With thousands of flavored e-cigarettes and tobacco products on the market in stores where young people shop, we are deeply concerned about the role that flavors play in contributing to teen addiction. Flavorings that masks the harsh taste of tobacco, combined with calculated marketing strategies, have served to target, attract, and addict far too many young people in Minnesota. Young smokers report choosing flavored tobacco products because they taste better and are perceived to be safer. This is quite alarming as nearly all e-cigarettes contain nicotine, which we know is highly addictive. Research shows youth who use e-cigarettes are four times more likely to start smoking combustible cigarettes. In September 2018, the Minnesota Department of Health issued a health advisory on nicotine and the escalating risk of addiction for youth. No amount is safe for youth as there are negative implications for learning, memory, attention, and future addiction. Teens are especially susceptible to nicotine addiction and the harmful effects it has on the brain as they grow. I applaud Edina for considering this bold action to protect youth from a lifetime of addiction. For more information, contact Laura Oliven, Tobacco Prevention Control Program Manager, at 651-201-5442. Sincerely, Jan K. Malcolm Commissioner P.O. Box 64975 St. Paul, MN 55164-0975 www.health.state.mn.us City of Edina Correspondence Submission If you are leaving comments for a public hearing being heard by Council or the Planning Commission, go to https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/public-hearings Correspondence Selection * Data Practices Advisory: Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all City Council Members and submitted for inclusion in the next public “Council packet.” Council packets are permanent records of materials prepared for City Council meetings. Council packets are public documents that are available in print, published on the City’s website and maintained in permanent electronic records. You are not required to complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name and street or email address, your comments will not be included in the Council packet. Open Meeting Law City Council Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Council Members cannot engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum of three or more members. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You might also receive a response from a City staff member. Email City Council: If you only want to email the City Council and not send your comments for publishing, contact members at CityCouncil@EdinaMN.gov. Contact Executive Assistant Jennifer Garske, at JGarske@EdinaMN.gov, if you have any questions or require assistance. Council Packet Deadline Correspondence must be received by noon the Friday prior to a City Council meeting in order to ensure it is published in the packet prior to the Council meeting. Submissions after that time may be included in a future Council packet. Name * Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Comments * File Upload By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above. Mayor & City Council Dennis Bornfleth Hankerson Ave Edina MN 55436 9529132130 no dashes or spaces denbor27@gmail.com Please find the following Considerations and Questions to the Hankerson Avenue Plan. Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png 6-16-20 City Council Comments.pdf 120.75KB Hankerson/William Avenue Issues for City Council Members: 1) At the City Council Meeting April 7th, Mayor Hovland said let’s look at 4 two-unit buildings but Donnay Homes said 8-units “Prices Us Out”. Apparently not since we’re meeting 6/16/20 and Donnay is proposing 8-units? 2) During the last several meetings with Commissioners, City Council and Mayor Hovland, the Northern setback was changed to 50-feet. However, to save the Southern trees (which is a good idea), Northern setback is back to 42 feet. Seems unusual since there are 20-ft of space between buildings and 2 fewer units? Also, the Hankerson Avenue setback has been reduced due to porches. Technically you say porches don’t count towards setbacks, but solid porches still block views of Northern neighbors. Rebuttal to 5/27/20 “Donnay Homes Summary” posted to PC Agenda: 1) Building to Building distance is 20’, allowing for a less monolithic feel to the project. It has taken the builder many months to realize their plan is monolithic. Unfortunately, the 2 buildings are still monolithic and block the views of the Neighbors. 2) Conclusion: Donnay Homes claims “this project will turn barriers into opportunities”, The only “barrier” we have on Hankerson and William Avenues is the “Missing Single Family and Twin Home” plan from the Builder! 3) Donnay says “we’re providing a buffer to the neighborhood, enhancing property values in the neighborhood, improving the Vernon Streetscape”. We don’t need 2 monolithic buildings to provide a buffer (or Gap filler) when the “Jerry’s Retail Center” is already quiet and the Vernon/Hankerson streets provide a great Buffer! Also, unless Donnay Homes is guaranteeing “enhanced property values” to surrounding neighbors, it’s another un-proven and possibly illegitimate statement. The Streetscape could become LESS attractive without Single Family or Twin Homes since these 2 buildings change the “Character of the Neighborhood”. And, if our 5-unit plan (which could gross $3-4 million on this small .67 acre) isn’t cost effective, then the property has probably been mismanaged and “Potential Resale Loses” and “Changing the Character” will be forced on the Neighbors. Please “Vote No” and let’s develop with the 93% Residential Plan in mind! City of Edina Correspondence Submission If you are leaving comments for a public hearing being heard by Council or the Planning Commission, go to https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/public-hearings Correspondence Selection * Data Practices Advisory: Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all City Council Members and submitted for inclusion in the next public “Council packet.” Council packets are permanent records of materials prepared for City Council meetings. Council packets are public documents that are available in print, published on the City’s website and maintained in permanent electronic records. You are not required to complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name and street or email address, your comments will not be included in the Council packet. Open Meeting Law City Council Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Council Members cannot engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum of three or more members. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You might also receive a response from a City staff member. Email City Council: If you only want to email the City Council and not send your comments for publishing, contact members at CityCouncil@EdinaMN.gov. Contact Executive Assistant Jennifer Garske, at JGarske@EdinaMN.gov, if you have any questions or require assistance. Council Packet Deadline Correspondence must be received by noon the Friday prior to a City Council meeting in order to ensure it is published in the packet prior to the Council meeting. Submissions after that time may be included in a future Council packet. Name * Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Mayor & City Council Jay Mahler 5120 Hankerson Ave Edina MN 55436 3122826081 no dashes or spaces jmahler@mac.com Comments * File Upload By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above. Mayor Hovland & City Council Members- We are a neighborhood. If this land on Hankerson is allowed to be rezoned to medium density as part of a potentially amended Grandview Plan you would be allowing the encroachment on our Neighborhood. I believe it is clear over the last number of months that the residents DON'T want this project. The Grandview Commercial District Plan (which isn't even approved) clearly states that a DEFINED 7% of commercial space will be developed and in a DEFINED space. This would bring our neighborhood in to that commercial space. We are NOT on Vernon...we are separate and should not be included in that plan. How about asking the builder/McDonoughs to provide additional twin home options and maybe a single family. All we have seen is a monstrous row house concept now with two structures. Ran out of space, but please have other options for developing this space and keep the character of the neighborhood. Thanks, Jay Mahler Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png City of Edina Correspondence Submission If you are leaving comments for a public hearing being heard by Council or the Planning Commission, go to https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/public-hearings Correspondence Selection * Data Practices Advisory: Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all City Council Members and submitted for inclusion in the next public “Council packet.” Council packets are permanent records of materials prepared for City Council meetings. Council packets are public documents that are available in print, published on the City’s website and maintained in permanent electronic records. You are not required to complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name and street or email address, your comments will not be included in the Council packet. Open Meeting Law City Council Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Council Members cannot engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum of three or more members. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You might also receive a response from a City staff member. Email City Council: If you only want to email the City Council and not send your comments for publishing, contact members at CityCouncil@EdinaMN.gov. Contact Executive Assistant Jennifer Garske, at JGarske@EdinaMN.gov, if you have any questions or require assistance. Council Packet Deadline Correspondence must be received by noon the Friday prior to a City Council meeting in order to ensure it is published in the packet prior to the Council meeting. Submissions after that time may be included in a future Council packet. Name * Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Mayor & City Council Roberta Castellano 4854 France Ave S Edina MN 55410-1756 no dashes or spaces Comments * File Upload By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above. Friday, June 12, 2020 Please see my letter with 3 attachments, which concerns the City of Edina’s numerous undisclosed alterations to the Future Land Use Map in the 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update. Thank you. Sincerely, Roberta Castellano Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png 2020Jun12_toCC_2018CPU_Alterations_to_FLU_M…110.25KB [ATT-1]_2020_3- 9_Revised_COMPLAINT_re_Edina'sCPU- FLUMap.pdf 6.1MB [ATT- 2]_MetC_Staff_Report_for_Edina's_CPU_(FLU_Ma… 2.46MB [ATT- 3]_MetC_CDC_Agenda_for_2020Jun15_Edina's_C… 417.86KB R. Castellano, 6-12-2020, Page 1 of 1 Delivered to City Council via the online Correspondence Submission Form Friday, June 12, 2020 Mayor and City Council, [ATT-1]_2020_3-9_Revised_COMPLAINT_re_Edina'sCPU-FLUMap Attached is a copy of a complaint that I filed with the Metropolitan Council in March 2020, concerning the City of Edina’s numerous undisclosed alterations to the Future Land Use (FLU) map in the 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update, which alterations were made during the 2019 public process (which included four Public Hearings), and which alterations continued even after the completion of the City Council’s December 3, 2019 Public Hearing. Some of you may already be aware of my complaint. It is important that all of you be aware of the map alteration activity. This is just one example of problematic conduct by the City of Edina in relation to the Comprehensive Planning process, and development activity. [ATT-2]_MetC_Staff_Report_for_Edina's_CPU_(FLU_Map_on_p.15) This attachment is a copy of the Metropolitan Council’s Staff Report for Edina’s Comprehensive Plan Update, for their upcoming committee and board meetings. The 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update, along with some of the Small Area Plans, are currently nearing the completion of the Metropolitan Council’s review and approval process. See Edina’s Future Land Use Map on Text and PDF Page 15 of the Staff Report. The resolution is excellent, and the fireworks of problematic colorations that were inserted as map alterations are now gone. Coloration is critical as it represents land use guidance. And yet, as exemplified by the matter of inconsistent language regarding 4-story building height in the 50th & France Small Area Plan, the City of Edina could still attempt to utilize inconsistencies to override this latest map version. [ATT-3]_MetC_CDC_Agenda_for_2020Jun15_Edina's_CPU This attachment is a copy of the Metropolitan Council’s Community Development Committee June 15, 2020 Meeting Agenda. A link to the Staff Report for Edina’s Comprehensive Plan Update is found at Agenda Item IV. 1. Click on “2020-149” (which I marked with a red arrow). The URL to the Agenda is: https://metrocouncil.org/getdoc/a500a151-e647-452f-8615-1ee2d7bb9206/Agenda.aspx. Sincerely, Roberta Castellano 4854 France Ave S Edina, MN 55410-1756 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 1 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps Complaint Regarding The City Of Edina’s Obfuscation And Repeated Undisclosed Alterations Of Parcel-Level Policies In Figure 3.12 The Future Land Use Map In The 2018 Comprehensive Plan Decennial Update. I. Introduction From time to time, when cities propose to make changes to their Comprehensive Plans, to amend the Plan, they are required by statute to conduct a public hearing, and to publish notice of the purpose of the hearing. A city may also conduct additional public hearings. Occasional Amendments are delineated in Minnesota Statutes, along with a Decennial Update. After completing a public hearing process, a city then submits the approved Plan Amendment or Decennial Update to the Metropolitan Council (“Met Council”) for authorization to place into effect. The City of Edina (“Edina”) recently completed a decennial update to its Comprehensive Plan, the 2018 Comprehensive Plan (“Comp Plan Update” or “CPU”), after receiving a one-year extension of the submittal deadline. Yet, in spite of conducting four public hearings, Edina has not provided full public disclosure of proposed changes. Instead of conducting hearings on proposed changes, Edina has been circumventing public disclosure and undermining the statutorily-required public hearing process in order to surreptitiously implement changes to Comprehensive Plan guiding land use policies. Edina’s problematic conduct has included repeated, surreptitious alterations of policy content in a map called Figure 3.12: Future Land Use (“the Future Land Use Map”, also: “the map”) throughout the public hearing process. Subsequent to the completion of the public hearing process, Edina altered the map again, prior to submitting the Comp Plan Update to the Met Council. Edina even altered the map one more time in a second submittal to the Met Council on February 14, 2020. By engaging in such conduct, Edina has effectively concealed intended policy changes from the public and made a mockery of the Comprehensive Plan and Public Hearing processes. In Edina’s Comp Plan Update, the Future Land Use Map is the sole source of data that documents Edina’s proposed official policy for the future land-use guidance of each and every parcel in the city, effective with final adoption of the Update. There are several problematic matters concerning Edina’s 2018 Comp Plan Update and the Small Area Plans. However, Edina’s repeated and surreptitious alterations of the Future Land Use Map are the primary focus of this complaint. I am asking the Metropolitan Council to reject the City of Edina’s 2018 Comprehensive Plan Decennial Update, and to conduct a thorough investigation into this matter, and I ask the Metropolitan Council to hold Edina accountable for this conduct to the fullest extent of your jurisdictional authority. Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 2 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps A. Advisement Regarding Investigation In this document, I have provided links and instructions to enable you to readily access each version of the Future Land Use Map that is at this time publicly posted by Edina. It is critical that you obtain copies directly from these source links as soon as possible, in order to verify the authenticity of my assertions and create your own database of evidence. Again, I urge you to download and fully catalog all of these publicly available draft versions immediately. I urge you and even warn you to maintain the highest level of confidentiality during your investigation. These records are under the control of Edina, and could be altered, removed, or switched at any time. The risk of tampering with documents currently posted online, will greatly increase if Edina is notified of an investigation prior to your obtaining all of the documentation, at which time an audit trail would likely be lost forever. As you will see, the City of Edina has demonstrated a propensity toward document alteration. B. Introductory Comments about Screenshots, Methods, and Details The City of Edina began on March 7, 2019 by issuing the first draft of the Comp Plan Update, which contained a map with poor-quality resolution. Edina never disclosed any of its subsequent and numerous alterations to the map. Even at this late date in the process, and after four public hearings, the public still is in the dark about what Guiding Land Use Changes the City of Edina is attempting to implement effective with adoption of the 2018 Comp Plan Update. The following pages contain screenshots of the Future Land Use Map from March 7, 2019 through February 14, 2020, as contained in various releases of the Comp Plan Update, whether announced as a new draft, or simply provided through a link for a public hearing, along with two versions that were obtained from Met Council records through a public data request. The maps are in chronological order. I have also included a limited amount of contextual data. I first downloaded all the documents. The file name assigned by Edina is itself a record. Not all browsers transmit the file name in download. I have found that by using Firefox browser, Edina’s originally assigned file name is maintained through the download process, so I have reported the file name as downloaded using Firefox. I zoomed each version of the map to maximum enlargement, focusing on 50th & France, then took a screenshot of each one, and then examined and compared each one in detail. In the earliest drafts, the Map is Figure 3.11, and was later renumbered to Figure 3.12. Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 3 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps To the screenshots, in order to call attention to various details, I have added black arrows, red arrows, red lines to mark specific roads, text boxes, and circles. The red arrow has no unique meaning as compared to the black arrow. It is simply for visual clarity against a dark background. Directions and links are provided under the screenshots of each map, so that you may easily access, download, and independently analyze each map version that has been publicly posted in Edina, while they are still available. Links are also provided to facilitate moving back and forth through the document, and even in some cases to compare certain maps. Even though not underlined, all of the lines in the Table of Contents are linked to their respective page. Also, as you can see on this page, there are links in the header and footer to return either to the Table of Contents or to the more concise, two-page listing of maps, source info, and source links. It is a little duplicative to have these links in both header and footer, but it does reduce some of the scrolling that would otherwise be necessary. Again, there is much context that I have not included. For example, I have submitted numerous letters to Edina, have spoken at many official meetings, and have filed several public data requests. This has been a time-consuming process, but this letter only scratches the surface. I apologize for the length of this letter, and I hope that you will not find it daunting, but I would like to say, that if Edina had been conducting its official business in a consistently open, forthcoming, and upstanding manner, none of this would have been necessary. As to the focus on 50th & France, I spent five months on activities similar to this, concerning the 50th & France Small Area Planning process. This is where I live, in the perimeter outside of the 50th & France Commercial District. I am familiar with the neighborhood and with various matters of concern within the neighborhood, and I have become familiar with strategies that Edina has employed to mislead the public, evade public disclosure, and circumvent the public hearing process. Given all the map changes, the rest of Edina should be examined in each of the maps, but that would be another project. Sincerely, Roberta Castellano 4854 France Ave S Edina, MN 55410-1756 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 4 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps C. March 9, 2020 Revisions To This Complaint 1. Incorporated communication records of my October 30, 2019 Public Data Request (“PDR”), in which I requested explicit, parcel-level disclosure of proposed changes in Guiding Land Use Category assignments: My request (Oct. 30, 2019), a string of communications (Oct. 30 – Dec. 27, 2019), and Edina’s notification of responsive data (Jan. 3, 2020). 2. Added two screenshots regarding the March 11, 2019 Open House. 3. Added many more links to facilitate navigation within this document, including links to go back and forth between map images. 4. Other than that, lesser edits and cleanup. Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 5 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps II. Table of Contents II. Table of Contents (Click on any line of Table to go to its page.) I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 A. Advisement Regarding Investigation .................................................................................. 2 B. Introductory Comments about Screenshots, Methods, and Details .................................. 2 C. March 9, 2020 Revisions To This Complaint ....................................................................... 4 II. Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................... 5 III. List of CPU Draft Versions, Different Base Maps Identified, Plus Links to Sources ................... 9 IV. Synopsis of Draft Releases, Alterations, and Non-Disclosure ................................................. 11 A. In First Draft, Policy Detail Was Obscured By Poor Resolution And Pixilation. ................ 11 B. Edina Released 5 Drafts Total Of Comp Plan Update During Public Hearing Process. ..... 11 C. Each Successive Draft Of Map Was Altered, Including Changes To Policy. ...................... 11 D. Edina Did Not Disclose Any Alterations To Map, Not Even In Redlined Version. ............. 11 E. After Completion Of Public Hearing Process, Edina Altered Map 3 More Times. ............ 11 V. Types of Surreptitious Alterations to The Future Land Use Map ............................................ 12 A. Changes To Image Clarity .................................................................................................. 12 B. Changes To Parcel-Level Guiding Policy By Changing The Color-Coding Of Parcels ......... 12 C. Timing Of Color Changes In Relation To Public Hearings .................................................. 12 D. Opening Gorgas Avenue Cul-De-Sac Into 50th & France Commercial District. ................ 13 E. Changes To Location Of Street Names Is Further Evidence Of Map Switching ................ 13 F. Utilization Of, And Changes To, Undefined Symbol (Solid Black Line) On Map That Delineates Policy Through Symbolism .............................................................................. 13 1. Solid Black Line Not Defined Is Red Flag Warning Of Attempt To Surreptitiously Insert Policy. ............................................................................................................ 13 2. Solid Black Line Was Surreptitiously Thickened. ..................................................... 14 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 6 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps 3. Solid Black Lines Overlays Parcels, Obscuring Color-Coding Of Parcel Portions Underneath. ............................................................................................................ 14 4. Edina Misrepresented Maple Road Homeowner Easement Holdings In 50th & France Small Area Plan (“SAP”), As Though The Easement Extended Into Their Own Backyards. ....................................................................................................... 14 5. The 10-15 Feet Would Total Roughly 0.15 Acres. Edina Could Change The Land Use Category Without Detection Because The Comp Plan Update Land Use Category Total Acreage Data Is Rounded To Whole Numbers, And Edina Has Provided No Text-Based Parcel Declarations. ............................................................................. 14 6. In Data Responsive To A Public Data Request, I Discovered That Edina Was Looking For Ways To Give More Developable Land To A Developer, To Enable Larger Buildings. ................................................................................................................. 14 7. I Confronted Edina About The Misrepresentation, But Edina Was Unresponsive. 14 8. In The 50th & France Small Area Plan, Edina Did Not Disclose Any Land Use Category Changes. .................................................................................................. 14 G. Screenshots about the Solid Black Line ............................................................................ 15 1. Screenshot of Solid Black Line in Draft 1: The March 6, 2019 Draft ...................... 15 2. Map Of Maple Road Parcel Portions Covered By Solid Black Line. ......................... 16 3. Screenshot Of Map Legend: Solid Black Line Not Defined In Legend. .................... 17 VI. Comparative Screenshots of Map in Each Draft of Comp Plan Update, With Some Context. 18 A. Predecessor Map In The 2008 Comprehensive Plan. ....................................................... 18 B. Open House March 11, 2019: Even Seemingly Ordinary Communications Benefit From Heightened Scrutiny. ........................................................................................................ 19 1. Open House Board For Land Use Chapter: That’s All Edina Provided. ................... 19 2. Purpose Of Open House As Described In Edina’s News Release. ........................... 20 3. Purpose Of Open House As Described In “Better Together” Calendar Entry. ........ 21 C. April 24, 2019 Planning Commission (“PC”) Public Hearing. ............................................ 22 1. CPU Draft 1 (Base Map 1): The March 6, 2019 Draft. ............................................. 22 2. Edina Represented Making No Guiding Land Use Category Changes, Which Turned Out To Be False, Along With False Data About Density Ranges And Affected Locations. Below is Slideshow Page 13 Shown At Both PC And CC Hearings. ....... 23 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 7 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps 3. “What Changes Are You Making?” Edina Resident Bruce D. Requests Mere “5 Minutes” Of Disclosure. .......................................................................................... 24 4. “We’ll Come Back To That One.” PC Chair Olsen Buys A Little More Time (for preparation of response?) ...................................................................................... 25 5. Not Now!: 20 Minutes Later, Appearing To Have Conferred, PC Chair Olsen And PC Berube Shared ‘Secret Sister-Like’ Chuckles As PC Berube Received Hand-Off Of Response Task From PC Chair, And Then Delivered Brush-Off While Spinning A Tall Tale Of Future Disclosure. ....................................................................................... 26 D. May 7, 2019 City Council (“CC”) Public Hearing ............................................................... 27 1. CPU Draft 1 (Base Map 1): The March 6, 2019 Draft. ............................................. 27 E. CPU Draft 2 (Base Map 2): The May “8”, 2019 Draft. Land Use Chapter was Backdated to May 7, 2019. ................................................................................................................. 28 F. CPU Text Revealed That Edina Had Given False Testimony At Public Hearings About Guiding Land Use Category Changes. ............................................................................... 29 1. Review Slideshow Page 13 from Public Hearings, PC on April 24 and CC on May 7, 2019. ....................................................................................................................... 29 2. CPU Text Revealed That Edina’s Intent To Change Guiding Land Use Category Assignments Independent Of Small Area Plans, Which Was Opposite Of What Edina Testified To During Public Hearings in April and May. .................................. 30 3. In My Sept. 26, 2019 Letter, I Called Out The Contradictions And Analyzed The CPU Narrative Step-By-Step. See Excerpt From My Letter, Below. ............................... 31 G. CPU Draft 3 (Base Map 3, Version 1): The “October 2019” Draft. Pages are actually dated 9-30-2019. Online-posted between Oct. 6-11, 2019. ............................................ 33 H. On October 30, 2019, I Filed A Public Data Request In A Last-Ditch (And Futile) Effort To Obtain Data That Edina Had Not Publicly Disclosed: Explicit, Clear, And Unambiguous Data Documenting What Guiding Land Use Category Changes Edina Was Intending To Make, And To What Parcels. ............................................................................................. 34 I. CPU Draft 4 (Base Map 2): The REDLINE. Online-Posted Between Oct27-Nov6, 2019. ... 36 1. REDLINE: Newsfeed Obscured Fact of Certain Undisclosed Alterations................ 36 2. REDLINE. Screenshot Of Full Map Image. .............................................................. 37 3. REDLINE. Zoomed-In. Has Features Of Base Map 2 (See May “8” Draft).............. 38 J. Nov. 13, 2019 Planning Commission (“PC”) Public Hearing. ............................................ 39 1. Per Edina, This Was The Statutorily-Required Public Hearing. ............................... 39 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 8 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps 2. (Base Map 3, Version 2): PC Nov.13 Public Hearing Draft. Edina Altered Colors On Base Map 3, But Did Not Give Chapter 3 A New Revision Date. ............................ 40 3. During PC Public Hearing, Consultant Haila Maze Testified To Importance Of “Extra Clear” “High-Rez” Map For Public. .......................................................................... 41 4. Consultant Haila Maze Also Testified That Public Comments At Both Hearings Would Be Submitted To Met Council. .................................................................... 42 K. Ch. 3 Draft 5 (Base Map 3, Version 2): for Dec. 3, 2019 City Council (“CC”) Public Hearing. Map appears to be the same version as for PC Nov.13. ................................................... 43 L. CPU Draft 6 (Base Map 2): Date Changed To 12-31-2019. Edina Switched Maps Again, This Time AFTER Final Hearings, Re-Inserting Color Changes. See Edina’s Archives. Edina States That It Submitted This Draft To The Met Council. ................................................. 44 M. CPU Draft 7 (Base Map 2, Version 2): Dated 12-31-2019. As Received By Met Council On 12-31-2019. Altered Again, Much More Blurry. .............................................................. 45 N. On January 3, 2020, I Received Notification From Edina Of Data Responsive To My Public Data Request (“PDR”) Of Oct. 30, 2019. The Responsive Data Was A 12-31-2019 Version Of The CPU. ....................................................................................................................... 46 1. Below Is Context, Record Of Communication From After Filing PDR On Oct. 30, 2019, Through Dec. 27, 2019. ................................................................................. 46 2. Edina Delayed Responsive Data Until AFTER Completing Public Hearing Process And AFTER Submittal Of CPU To Met Council. Below Is January 3, 2020 Email From Edina, Sent Separately, and Thus Detached, From Context Of Existing Email String. Responsive Data Was Copy Of CPU. ........................................................... 50 O. CPU Draft 8 (Base Map 4): Dated 2-7-2020. Received By Met Council On 2-14-2020. Street Name Placements Are Unique To This Map. This Is A Different Base Map. ......... 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 9 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps III. List of CPU Draft Versions, Different Base Maps Identified, Plus Links to Sources Links to Maps in this document are underlined below URLs to Edina’s web pages are in this column CPU Draft 1: Base Map 1: Draft dated March 6, 2019 (see two links below) Source: NovusAgenda, Edina’s contracted web service for public meeting records, which are organized by meeting agenda. Publicly available online only through links on Agenda Item Coversheets for: Link to PC Map Draft 1.a. April 24, 2019 Planning Commission Public Hearing: https://edina.novusagenda.com/AgendaPublic/CoverSheet.aspx?ItemID=6395 &MeetingID=1075 Link to CC Map Draft 1.b. May 7, 2019 City Council Public Hearing: https://edina.novusagenda.com/AgendaPublic/CoverSheet.aspx?ItemID=6450 &MeetingID=1094 Downloaded and compared maps. Appear to be the same. CPU Draft 2: Base Map 2: The May “8” Draft. Most chapters dated May 8, 2019. But Ch.3 Land Use was backdated to May 7, 2019 creating a cascade of false implications that I addressed to City Council. Other Backdates: Executive Summary May6; Ch.2 Comm. Profile May7. Source: Edina’s Comp Plan webpage: https://www.edinamn.gov/647/Comprehensive-Plan CPU Draft 3: Base Map 3: Dated Sept. 30, 2019, but Edina refers to it as the “October 2019 Draft”. Posted between Oct. 6-11. Source: Edina’s Comp Plan webpage: https://www.edinamn.gov/647/Comprehensive-Plan CPU Draft 4: The REDLINE Dated Sept. 30, 2019. Posted between Oct. 27 – Nov. 6. Ostensible (false) representation of all revisions to CPU from Mar6 to Sep30. Source: Edina’s Comp Plan webpage: https://www.edinamn.gov/647/Comprehensive-Plan Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 10 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps Base Map 3, Version 2 Edina cited this version for the Nov.13, 2019 PC Public Hearing. Publicly available exclusively through Edina’s NovusAgenda website. Download via a link on the Agenda Item’s Coversheet for the November 13, 2019 Planning Commission Public Hearing: https://edina.novusagenda.com/AgendaPublic/CoverSheet.aspx?ItemID =7341&MeetingID=1087 Edina altered Base Map 3, but did not give Land Use Ch3 a new date. Instead, it was falsely dated Sept. 30, 2019 (which would be the Oct. 2019 Draft, but, again, it is NOT the same). (Base Map 3, Version 2) Revision Date Nov 21, 2019: Draft 5 of Ch. 3 Land Use only. Downloaded from NovusAgenda. Publicly available exclusively via a link on the Agenda Item’s Coversheet for the December 3, 2019 City Council Public Hearing: https://edina.novusagenda.com/AgendaPublic/CoverSheet.aspx?ItemID =7394&MeetingID=1101 Revision date not shown on Coversheet, but is in file name in download. Map appears to be same as PC Hearing. Draft 6 (Base Map 2) Edina’s In-House Record of Ch. 3 Land Use: Dated Dec. 31, 2019 Per Edina, this is the revision date of the Final Draft that was submitted to the Met Council. Was initially publicly available only through Edina’s online document archive called “EdinaDocs”, and I downloaded it from there: https://www.edinamn.gov/964/Edina-Docs-Document-Archive File pathway: “To learn more or visit...”>Planning Folder> Comprehensive Plan- Met Council Submittal December 2019> 03 Land Use Chapter 12-31-19 Have not compared this yet As of 3-5-2020, I found that it is also now available via Edina’s Comp Plan webpage: https://www.edinamn.gov/647/Comprehensive-Plan (Base Map 2, Version 2) Met Council Ch3 Land Use Version 1: Revision Dec. 31, 2019 I obtained this by email from the Met Council through a public data request. (Base Map 4) Met Council Ch3 Land Use Version 2: Revision date Feb. 7, 2020, submittal date February 14, 2020. I obtained this by email from the Met Council through a public data request. Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 11 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps IV. Synopsis of Draft Releases, Alterations, and Non-Disclosure A. In First Draft, Policy Detail Was Obscured By Poor Resolution And Pixilation. Edina publicly released first draft of the Plan Update on March 7, 2019. In this first draft, the Future Land Use Map was of low resolution, with pixilation that obscured policy detail. B. Edina Released 5 Drafts Total Of Comp Plan Update During Public Hearing Process. After the first draft, Edina publicly released three more regular draft versions of the Comp Plan Update. A redlined version was also released during the public hearing process after Edina received complaints of undisclosed alterations to the Plan Update. C. Each Successive Draft Of Map Was Altered, Including Changes To Policy. During the public hearing process, from March 7 to December 3, 2019, the City of Edina issued five (5) draft versions of the 2018 Comp Plan Update. By inspecting every draft version, I have found that Edina had made successive changes to each draft of the Future Land Use Map after the first draft. This included heavily obscured changes to guiding land use policy assignments. D. Edina Did Not Disclose Any Alterations To Map, Not Even In Redlined Version. As already mentioned, Edina released a redlined version of the Comp Plan Update after receiving complaints of undisclosed changes. During a public meeting, Edina testified that the redlined draft reflected all changes made since the first draft, but that was not true. A careful reading of a confusingly- worded online city announcement about the redlined draft, reveals a period of time for which disclosure was not provided. E. After Completion Of Public Hearing Process, Edina Altered Map 3 More Times. After the hearing, the City produced three (3) more draft versions, and the Future Land Use Map is rendered differently in each of them. These three draft versions are: 1. Revised date Dec. 31, 2019, housed in Edina’s online records archive called “EdinaDocs”. 2. Revised date Dec. 31, 2019, submitted to the Metropolitan Council on Dec. 31, 2019. 3. Revised date Feb. 7, 2020, submitted to the Metropolitan Council on Feb 14, 2020. Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 12 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps V. Types of Surreptitious Alterations to The Future Land Use Map A. Changes To Image Clarity Regarding clarity, Edina began with a heavily pixilated image that was substantially inferior to the clarity of the predecessor map in the decennial Comp Plan Update of 2008 (10 years ago). In subsequent alterations, Edina has continued to use pixilation, along with darkening and other masking techniques which blur or otherwise disrupt the image and obscure policy detail and other detail. B. Changes To Parcel-Level Guiding Policy By Changing The Color-Coding Of Parcels The City repeatedly altered the Guiding Land Use Categories assigned to individual parcels. The Guiding Land Use Categories are color-coded, so changing a parcel’s color is an act of changing the policy for that parcel. Changing a color surreptitiously is a way to bypass public disclosure and the statutorily-required public hearing process. The colors vary in intensity, even appearing as pale color washes in some areas, making it that much more unlikely to be noticed. It even appears that Edina created different base maps with different coloration and other qualities, swapped them, and then further obscured them. I will discuss this in greater detail during a visual review of map screenshots later in this letter. Edina has not provided existing acreage for Guiding Land Use Categories. The public does not know what the existing acreage totals are. Further, Edina could very possibly change the guidance of these parcels without disclosure, because the acreage for individual parcels would likely disappear in rounding to whole numbers. Edina has not disclosed any land use category changes in this Comp Plan Update process. C. Timing Of Color Changes In Relation To Public Hearings Each parcel in the Future Land Use Map is color-coded to show the future guiding land use policy that Edina has assigned to it (effective with the adoption of the Comp Plan Update). The single-family homes and single-family-attached homes in the perimeter outside of the 50th & France District are guided Low Density Residential (“LDR”), consistent with their existing use. Below is an overview of the general types of policy alterations, and when the alterations occurred. 1. The draft used for the first hearings did not show changes from existing LDR guidance. 2. After the hearings, Edina inserted policy changes into a new draft (blue, green, pink). 3. In a letter to City Council, I revealed Edina’s public hearing falsifications, as compared to CPU narrative statements, and called on Council to remove undisclosed land use category changes. 4. After my letter, and prior to the second and final round of hearings, Edina removed the policy changes (restoring LDR guidance). (Although I have now identified two spots of color.) 5. After the final hearings, Edina re-inserted policy changes (blue, green, pink), and then submitted two different maps to the Met Council on separate dates. Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 13 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps D. Opening Gorgas Avenue Cul-De-Sac Into 50th & France Commercial District. Gorgas Ave. is a North-South road, south of the 50th & France Commercial District, and 1 block west of France Ave. There is a cul-de-sac at the north end of Gorgas Ave. Two Single-Family Home parcels share a border, which caps the top of the cul-de-sac. In the blurred versions of the Future Land Use Map, the boundary between the two parcels is clearly thicker than the boundary line between other parcels. Further, in these same map versions, Edina has also changed the parcel coloring of at least one of the home’s parcels to blue. Edina is attempting to surreptitiously change the Guiding Land Use Category of these and several other single-family and two- family homes, around the outside of the 50th & France District. While the version produced for the final hearings did not bear any of alterations to the cul-de-sac, or any properties on Gorgas Ave., Edina changed the map prior to submittal to the Met Council, re-inserting these and several other Guiding Land Use Category changes around the outside of the 50th & France District. Click here to view Gorgas Ave on March 6 map. Click here to view Gorgas Ave in Oct. Map (9-30-2019). Return links are on each map, in Gorgas Ave text box. E. Changes To Location Of Street Names Is Further Evidence Of Map Switching The location of street names changes on the map varies with draft versions, and appears to be associated with particular characteristics of brightness or darkness, blurriness or pixilation or clarity, addition or absence of pink, blue, and green colors, and also the rendition of the solid black line as either thinner and straighter lines of precise width, or thicker lines with uneven width. I see this as evidence that Edina is utilizing different maps that have been prepared and saved with different characteristics, to serve as base maps. By saving different versions, the maps could easily be switched at any time, and fine-tuned, apparently, for chosen qualities. F. Utilization Of, And Changes To, Undefined Symbol (Solid Black Line) On Map That Delineates Policy Through Symbolism Several maps in the Land Use Chapter of the 2018 Comp Plan Update are observational only, representing various existing, parcel-based statistical data. Symbols in those maps are not policy. 1. Solid Black Line Not Defined Is Red Flag Warning Of Attempt To Surreptitiously Insert Policy. The Future Land Use Map is not observational. It is a policy map, a map that depicts policy pictorially, and Edina is utilizing symbolism (a solid black line) that it has not defined in the Future Land Use Map Legend. The undefined solid black line is a red flag warning that Edina is attempting to surreptitiously change the guiding land use policies for specific parcels. Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 14 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps 2. Solid Black Line Was Surreptitiously Thickened. In addition to surreptitiously changing color-coding of parcels, Edina also surreptitiously thickened the solid black line in ways that have obscured its placement, and, therefore, obscured its relation to specific parcels. 3. Solid Black Lines Overlays Parcels, Obscuring Color-Coding Of Parcel Portions Underneath. In the first draft of the Future Land Use Map, it is evident when viewed on-screen in full zoom, that the solid black line is overlaying several Maple Road parcels. As previously stated, Guiding Land Use Categories are color-coded, so it is essential to see the color of the portion of each parcel that is currently under the solid black line, to know which guiding policy Edina is intending to assign to it. 4. Edina Misrepresented Maple Road Homeowner Easement Holdings In 50th & France Small Area Plan (“SAP”), As Though The Easement Extended Into Their Own Backyards. Edina inserted a set of drawings to represent, using green coloring, an existing, deeded easement that is held by 20 homes on Maple Road, which had already been held for many years and was reaffirmed and created into perpetual easement by a 1971 District Court judgment. But in the drawings, the easement was shown to extend roughly 15 feet into the backyards the 7 abutting Maple Road residents’ properties (one has a 50th St. address). Maple Road is a north-south road that is just west of the 50th & France Commercial District, with 7 properties abutting the District. 5. The 10-15 Feet Would Total Roughly 0.15 Acres. Edina Could Change The Land Use Category Without Detection Because The Comp Plan Update Land Use Category Total Acreage Data Is Rounded To Whole Numbers, And Edina Has Provided No Text-Based Parcel Declarations. 6. In Data Responsive To A Public Data Request, I Discovered That Edina Was Looking For Ways To Give More Developable Land To A Developer, To Enable Larger Buildings. 7. I Confronted Edina About The Misrepresentation, But Edina Was Unresponsive. In my 3-27-2019 letter, I confronted Edina about the misrepresentation of the easement. I suspected that Edina would attempt through this misrepresentation to make a future false claim of having changed the guiding land use category. Edina did not respond. 8. In The 50th & France Small Area Plan, Edina Did Not Disclose Any Land Use Category Changes. See screenshots on next 3 pages. Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 15 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps G. Screenshots about the Solid Black Line 1. Screenshot of Solid Black Line in Draft 1: The March 6, 2019 Draft • The March 6, 2019 Draft of the 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update can be accessed online, exclusively through Edina’s NovusAgenda pages. This screenshot is from copy obtained and downloaded from a link on the Agenda Item’s Coversheet: 1) for the April 24, 2019 Planning Commission Public Hearing https://edina.novusagenda.com/AgendaPublic/CoverSheet.aspx?ItemID=6395&MeetingID=1075 • File name as received when downloaded by Firefox browser: FINAL%20COMPLETED%20COMP%20PLAN%20COPY_1 The solid black line is not defined in the Map Legend. Black dashed line is city boundary and is defined in Map Legend. Note the precise rendering of the line. Even in thickness, with rigid verticals and horizontals, no curves. There was a similar representation of a jog in the 50th & France Small Area Plan, but Edina did not claim to make any changes in guiding land use policy for any parcels. The jog in the west perimeter is overlapping single-family homes on 50th St. and on Maple Rd. Edina is attempting to surreptitiously change guiding land use policy for these homes. See HC map on next page Maple Road, in bright red. Gorgas Ave in bright red. Back to Text Next: Maple Rd Return To Final Page (p51) Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 16 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps 2. Map Of Maple Road Parcel Portions Covered By Solid Black Line. • The jog in the west perimeter is highly significant, as it is overlapping single-family homes. • I submitted a March 27, 2019 letter to Planning Commission and City Council about this, but Edina never acknowledged my letter, and never acknowledged any intent for Maple properties. • The 10-15 feet could total roughly 0.15 acres, a number that could be concealed by Edina in Comp Plan Update numerical data, as currently drafted, because Comp Plan Update Land Use Category total acreage data is rounded to whole numbers, and Edina has not provided any companion text-based disclosure of parcels targeted for Guiding Land Use Category changes. • In the 50th & France Small Area Plan, Edina did not claim to make any land use category changes. Next: Map Legend Prior: Solid Black Line Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 17 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps 3. Screenshot Of Map Legend: Solid Black Line Not Defined In Legend. “Figure 3.11 Future Land Use”, Map Legend, found on PDF Page 115 of 436, Text Page 3-25. • The March 6, 2019 Draft of the 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update can be accessed online, exclusively through Edina’s NovusAgenda pages. This screenshot is from copy obtained and downloaded from a link on the Agenda Item’s Coversheet: 1) for the April 24, 2019 Planning Commission Public Hearing https://edina.novusagenda.com/AgendaPublic/CoverSheet.aspx?ItemID=6395&MeetingID=1075 • File name as received when downloaded by Firefox browser: FINAL%20COMPLETED%20COMP%20PLAN%20COPY_1 • In order to show the entire Legend, this is not a full zoom. In addition to the obstructive pixilation, the poor-quality of resolution is noticeable here, too, both in the city logo, and in the blurriness of the words. By contrast, black dashed line is defined in Map Legend. Solid black line was not defined. Next: 2008 Prior: Maple Road Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 18 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps VI. Comparative Screenshots of Map in Each Draft of Comp Plan Update, With Some Context. A. Predecessor Map In The 2008 Comprehensive Plan. “Figure 4.3 Future Land Use Plan”, found on PDF Page 75, Text Page 4-25. • Go to https://www.edinamn.gov/647/Comprehensive-Plan. • Scroll down to the heading “Comprehensive Plan Resources”, and click on the link. • The Link title is: City of Edina Comprehensive Plan 2008 (PDF) • File name as downloaded by Firefox: City%20of%20Edina%20Comp%20Plan%202008%20 Arrow points to the 50th & France District, which is color- coded a dark red, representing Mixed-Use Center (MXC) Land Use guidance. Next: PC Apr.24 Prior: Map Legend Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 19 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps B. Open House March 11, 2019: Even Seemingly Ordinary Communications Benefit From Heightened Scrutiny. 1. Open House Board For Land Use Chapter: That’s All Edina Provided. • Edina had posted some of the Land Use Boards on its adjunct website Better Together, but they have since been removed. • Edina omitted some boards from the online-posting. • While at the Open, I did take photographs of all of the boards. Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 20 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps 2. Purpose Of Open House As Described In Edina’s News Release. • Yellow highlighting is mine. • Received in an email, after signing up for Comprehensive Plan notifications. • This news release seems fairly straightforward, and seemed to suggest that the public would learn about Edina’s proposed Comprehensive Plan, enough to be able to provide feedback. Yet, it does not quite match the example of the Land Use board. • A calendar posting on “Better Together Edina”, Edina’s new adjunct communications website, provided a slightly different description. See next page. Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 21 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps 3. Purpose Of Open House As Described In “Better Together” Calendar Entry. https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/comp-plan-update • Yellow highlighting is mine. • As you can see, the description in “Better Together” is slightly different, describing a purpose more about comprehensive “plans” generally, and the process of preparing Edina’s plan, rather than to inform the public about specifics, such as proposed changes to Edina’s Comprehensive Plan. This description better matches content of the Land Use and other boards at the Open. • In a re-reading of Edina’s news release (on prior page), one can see that it did not say exactly what kind of information would be presented. • In Edina, I have previously spoken to a need to “dissect” information coming from Edina, and the Open House was no exception. Even seemingly ordinary communications demonstrate the value of heightened scrutiny at all times. Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 22 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps C. April 24, 2019 Planning Commission (“PC”) Public Hearing. 1. CPU Draft 1 (Base Map 1): The March 6, 2019 Draft. “Figure 3.11 Future Land Use”, found on PDF Page 115 of 436, Text Page 3-25. • The only way to access the March 6, 2019 Draft is through Edina’s NovusAgenda website, via a link in each of the Agenda Item Coversheets for the first two Public Hearings. • The above screenshot is from the Planning Commission’s Coversheet: 1.a. 4/24/2019 Planning Commission Public Hearing https://edina.novusagenda.com/AgendaPublic/CoverSheet.aspx?ItemID=6395&MeetingID=1075 • File name as downloaded in Firefox: FINAL%20COMPLETED%20COMP%20PLAN%20COPY_1 • Policy detail in this draft is obscured by pixilation. Note the solid black line surrounding the entire district. Straight lines of uniform thickness. Note a jog in the solid black line, just north of 50th St. The City did not disclose the purpose of the solid black line in this map. It is overlapping Maple Road homes. See Maple in HC Map. The dashed line is the Edina/Mpls city boundary, and is defined in the map’s Legend. By contrast, the solid black line is not defined. “Base Map 1”. Note street names in circle at left. Watch for differences in street names & placement. Base Map 1 Next: CC May 7 Prior: 2008 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 23 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps 2. Edina Represented Making No Guiding Land Use Category Changes, Which Turned Out To Be False, Along With False Data About Density Ranges And Affected Locations. Below is Slideshow Page 13 Shown At Both PC And CC Hearings. https://youtu.be/StAoVlrfGo8?t=940 False and misleading presentation: 1. Slideshow Page 13 Heading “Land Use Guide Changes” presented NO acreage changes. 2. “Units per acre were all approved as part of each Small Area Plan.” Was false. 3. “...increased density. These areas are entirely with the Greater Southdale Area.” False. 4. Medium Density Residential: falsely reported existing and future Density. 5. High Density Residential is not exclusive to Southdale. Other locations would be affected by Density increase. 6. Greater Southdale Residential was not a pre-existing category. 7. Current Density at 50th & France: 100 du/ac was obtained from Met Council, but under false pretenses. City Council reduced Density to 75 du/ac after I confronted Edina about its actions during City Council Apr.2, 2019 Public Hearing for 50th & France Small Area Plan. 8. Acreage at Mixed-Use Center 50th & France and Grandview misrepresented as existing. 9. Southdale Mixed-Use Center: Land Use Category and Density surreptitiously changed. Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 24 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps 3. “What Changes Are You Making?” Edina Resident Bruce D. Requests Mere “5 Minutes” Of Disclosure. https://youtu.be/StAoVlrfGo8?t=2295 38.16 “Good evening. My name is Bruce Douglas. I live at 3915 West 42nd in Morningside. I downloaded the Comprehensive Plan today and skimmed it all 436 pages of it, and it’s impressive, and I'm sure you all did a lot of work, and I applaud the effort, but I think for purposes of this evening if I may make a suggestion. 38.44 It's all interesting to know what the process was and how transparent it was and how many people wrote in and how many people clicked on the website [Better Together Edina] and with all due respect to Miss Lamon, I really don't care how many people clicked on the website. 39.00 I think it would be helpful if the Commission in five minutes or less could simply tell us what changes are you proposing for our city, why are you proposing the changes, and how do you think it's going to affect those of us who live here. Thank you.” Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 25 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps 4. “We’ll Come Back To That One.” PC Chair Olsen Buys A Little More Time (for preparation of response?) https://youtu.be/StAoVlrfGo8?t=3638 1.00.38 Chair Olsen: Then we also heard for each of us to explain what we think the Comp Plan is doing. I might put that off till we're done with these other questions, but I think that's a good opportunity for us to say what the Comp Plan is providing. I agree, I think that's a, that's a, an important point, so we'll come back to that one. Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 26 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps 5. Not Now!: 20 Minutes Later, Appearing To Have Conferred, PC Chair Olsen And PC Berube Shared ‘Secret Sister-Like’ Chuckles As PC Berube Received Hand-Off Of Response Task From PC Chair, And Then Delivered Brush-Off While Spinning A Tall Tale Of Future Disclosure. https://youtu.be/StAoVlrfGo8?t=5085 1.24.46 Chair Olsen: So, do we want to, you know, just open it up for comments, [turns to address Commissioner Berube] and feel free to, you know, do your elevator speech on what you [chuckles]-- Commissioner Berube: [Chuckles] Well, I would like to comment or respond to the request to have the 5-minute, you know, what’s this all about, what are the changes, how will it affect Edina. 1.25.08 I think that was a really good question. Maybe in hindsight we should have opened with that. We probably didn’t think of it, because, there’s still a piece that will come from the City Council. So, if this gets approved and goes down the, the path, what you’ll see in addition to this, is what you might think of as kind of an executive summary, or cover letter, that’s gonna come from the City Council, the Mayor and the City Council, and it will be a very high level overview and will address exactly what you’re commenting on. Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 27 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps D. May 7, 2019 City Council (“CC”) Public Hearing 1. CPU Draft 1 (Base Map 1): The March 6, 2019 Draft. “Figure 3.11 Future Land Use”, found on PDF Page 115 of 436 (Text Page 3-25) • The only way to access the March 6, 2019 Draft is through Edina’s NovusAgenda pages, via a link in each of the Agenda Item Coversheets for the first two Public Hearings. • This screenshot is from the 2nd meeting, the City Council’s Coversheet: May 7, 2019 City Council Public Hearing: https://edina.novusagenda.com/AgendaPublic/CoverSheet.aspx?ItemID=6450&MeetingID=1094 • File name as downloaded in Firefox: FINAL%20COMPLETED%20COMP%20PLAN%20COPY_1 • Appears to be the same map as in Planning Commission download. • Encircled area: Note changes in appearance of street and neighborhood names in later drafts. • Gorgas Ave: Compare north end cul-de-sac to map in May 8, 2019 map. Gorgas Ave is a cul-de-sac at the north end. The thin line going up is merely a parcel boundary, not a road. It is the same width as other parcel boundaries. See it changed in the so-called “May 8 draft” (Land Use Chapter was backdated to May 7). Base Map 1 Watch street names change and move across the versions. Next: May “8” Prior: PC Apr 24 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 28 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps E. CPU Draft 2 (Base Map 2): The May “8”, 2019 Draft. Land Use Chapter was Backdated to May 7, 2019. Figure 3.11 Future Land Use map, found on PDF Page 114 of 436, Text Page • This image is from the so-called May 8, 2019 draft. However, the Land use Chapter was backdated to May 7, 2019. I addressed the backdating to City Council. • This draft can be downloaded from a link on Edina’s Comprehensive Plan webpage: https://www.edinamn.gov/647/Comprehensive-Plan • Link title: Draft Comprehensive Plan 5.8.19. Currently under the heading “Comprehensive Plan Resources”. • File name as downloaded in Firefox: _Draft%20Comprehensive%20Plan%205.8.19_201905081535596218 • Encircled area is for an example. Neighborhood names throughout the screenshot, do not match placement in March 6, 2019 draft. • Added colors appear elsewhere, too, which could be red herrings to suggest that blotchy color is accidental. In any case, color is policy. Map has been darkened and blurred. Patchy dark areas large and small. Edina added pink, blue, and green colors to residential properties all around the periphery outside of 50th & France Commercial District. See 3 small ovals below. Colors are diffuse, not clear. So blurry, the westerly shift in solid black line north of 50th St is barely visible. Street names do not match March 6 Map. Parcel boundary at Gorgas Ave cul-de-sac now is wider than nearby parcel boundaries. Also, blue color on parcels. Base Map 2 Compare to Edina’s 12-31-2019 Draft Return to REDLINE Next: “October” Draft Prior: CC May 7 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 29 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps F. CPU Text Revealed That Edina Had Given False Testimony At Public Hearings About Guiding Land Use Category Changes. 1. Review Slideshow Page 13 from Public Hearings, PC on April 24 and CC on May 7, 2019. https://youtu.be/StAoVlrfGo8?t=940 False and misleading information given to public: 1. Under the Heading “Land Use Guide Changes” Edina represented a column for current Density and a column for future Density, thus showing that it was making changes. 2. However, Edina had displayed only one column of acreage totals. Since there was no differentiation between existing and future, it naturally appeared that Edina was proposing NO changes in Guiding Land Use Category assignments. 3. But, that was false and misleading. Text in the Comp Plan Update alluded to Guiding Land Use Category assignment changes, but explicit details were not disclosed. Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 30 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps 2. CPU Text Revealed That Edina’s Intent To Change Guiding Land Use Category Assignments Independent Of Small Area Plans, Which Was Opposite Of What Edina Testified To During Public Hearings in April and May. • Sentences re-arranged to reveal logical progression: i. “Figure 3.11 shows the planned land use for all property within Edina.” ii. “The planned future land uses shown on this map reflect previous community planning efforts as well as desired updates identified as part of the 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update process.” iii. “Table 3.5 summarizes the planned land uses by category shown on the map.” • I have copied in a portion of my letter on the next page, which contains the bulk of my analysis. Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 31 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps 3. In My Sept. 26, 2019 Letter, I Called Out The Contradictions And Analyzed The CPU Narrative Step-By-Step. See Excerpt From My Letter, Below. Returning briefly to Slideshow Table 3.5 [ATT-1], it is important to note that above the table, the City placed an attention-grabbing, bright green, large-font heading, defining that this table was reporting “Land Use Guide Changes”. In the table, the City reported several intended changes in “density” (housing unit density, as in the number of dwelling units per acre). The City did not report an intent to make any changes in the number of acres assigned to each of the land-use categories, thus implying that there were none, but it appears now that the City has simply withheld data from the public. Table 3.5 is also in the Draft Plan (“Draft Plan Table 3.5”) [ATT-3], but you can see that much of the data found in the Slideshow Table 3.5 has disappeared. The narrative text above the Draft Plan Table 3.5 refers to unspecified updates, and the sentences are jumbled, which obscures the logical progression: “Figure 3.11 shows the planned land use for all property within Edina. Table 3.5 summarizes the planned land uses by category shown on the map. The planned future land uses shown on this map reflect previous community planning efforts as well as desired updates identified as part of the 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update process.” I have rearranged some sentences from the paragraph quoted above, to show the logical progression of action from Figure 3.11 to Table 3.5: 2. “Figure 3.11 shows the planned land use for all property within Edina.” 3. “The planned future land uses shown on this map reflect previous community planning efforts as well as desired updates identified as part of the 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update process.” 4. “Table 3.5 summarizes the planned land uses by category shown on the map.” “Figure 3.11 Future Land Use” is a map of Edina that shows land-use category assignments [ATT-4]. Therefore, “updates” to the map (see Sentence 2) would mean that some land was reclassified to a different category. During the past 10 years, the City Council has approved some reclassifications, so the new map should incorporate revisions that reflect those past changes. Indeed, the City has clearly distinguished the past (“previous community planning efforts”) from the present. Regarding the present, the City has stated that there are “updates” –plural, not singular-- to the map that are “desired”, and which were specifically “identified as part of the 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update process”. Moreover, based on the sentences quoted above, Figure 3.11 should be considered authoritative, and Table 3.5 should constitute a re-formatting of the data found in Figure 3.11. Therefore, one can infer that both formats should represent the “desired updates identified as part of the 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update process” described for Figure 3.11. If this is true, then the Comp Plan Version of Table 3.5 should be reflecting more than one land-use category change specific to this current process. And yet, during the public vetting of the 2018 Comp Plan, the City did not announce to the public any land-use category changes specific to this process! Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 32 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps 3. In My Sept. 26, 2019 Letter, I Called On City Council To “Come Clean” About, And Remove, All Undisclosed Guiding Land Use Category Changes. See Partial Text Copied In, Below: A comparison of the Draft Plan “Figure 3.11 Future Land Use” map to the 2008 Comprehensive Plan “Figure 4.3 Future Land Use Plan” map, might provide some help, but such an exercise is a pitiful and inadequate substitute for the complete, unambiguous data that the City has, is currently concealing, and should be disclosing, in this process. See the 2008 “Figure 4.3 Future Land Use Plan” map in [ATT-5]. Attached is an enlargement and comparison of these two maps for the 50th & France District [ATT-6]. Also attached is an enlargement and comparison of these two maps for the Grandview District [ATT-7]. As you can see, it is not possible to confirm where the 7-acre discrepancy is located. Further, the 2018 Draft Plan map is of poor resolution, which obscures detail with enlargement and undermines effective comparison. While it is not possible for me to draw conclusions, I can identify a few possibilities. First, at 50th & France [ATT-6], it appears that the City is intending to recategorize to MXC, a portion of the backyards of several Maple Road single-family homes. No such change was reported in the 50th & France Small Area Plan (SAP) process. The total number of acres categorized as MXC at 50th & France was not even reported in the SAP. (The SAP was approved by Council vote on April 2, 2019.) Second, at Grandview [ATT-7], it appears that the City is intending to change the land-use category of Tupa Park from Parks to MXC, and this has a particular significance, because it suggests that the City is marching forward with planning for “The Lid” (aka the “Grandview Green”). One rough, sample measurement using Hennepin County’s map feature, yielded a result of 6.92 acres [ATT-8] ! To the extent that land use category changes were not fully disclosed to the public, the public review process was undermined, and the public hearing process was a sham. I call on the City Council to “come clean” about all of the City of Edina’s intended land use category changes at 50th & France, at Grandview, and throughout the entire city, without any further delay, and to remove any such changes from the Draft Plan. • Full letter with enclosures is available online through the Agenda for the Oct. 1, 2019 meeting of the City Council. Below is a link to the Coversheet for Correspondence: https://edina.novusagenda.com/AgendaPublic/CoverSheet.aspx?ItemID=7119&MeetingID=1099 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 33 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps G. CPU Draft 3 (Base Map 3, Version 1): The “October 2019” Draft. Pages are actually dated 9-30-2019. Online-posted between Oct. 6-11, 2019. Figure 3.12 Future Land Use map, found on PDF Page 117 of 447, Text Page 3-26. • This draft can be downloaded from a link on Edina’s Comprehensive Plan webpage: https://www.edinamn.gov/647/Comprehensive-Plan • Link title: October 2019 Comprehensive Plan Draft (PDF). Currently, it is the 3rd link down, in the list under the heading “Comprehensive Plan Resources”. Again, pages are dated 9-30-2019. • File name as downloaded in Firefox: 2018%20Comp%20Plan%20Assembled_pdf • Edina altered the solid black line. It is thicker than March 6 and May “8” Draft. • By thickening the line, Edina obscured the visibility of westerly jog in the line north of 50th Street, which in this rendition appears as mere nick in solid black line as it crosses 50th Street. Map brighter and much higher quality resolution. None of the problem pink, blue or green colors in outside periphery (circled), or beyond. Solid black line is uneven, appears hand drawn. Base Map 3 Divot in thickened solid black line demonstrates that Edina is concealing the westerly jog. Solid black line is obviously thicker throughout. Thicker solid black line, along with street lettering (“Maple”), conceals exact location of line, but it is overlapping homes on Maple Road (bright red). Next: REDLINE Gorgas Ave in bright red. Back to Text Prior: May “8” No color in circle. Compare PC Nov.13 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 34 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps H. On October 30, 2019, I Filed A Public Data Request In A Last-Ditch (And Futile) Effort To Obtain Data That Edina Had Not Publicly Disclosed: Explicit, Clear, And Unambiguous Data Documenting What Guiding Land Use Category Changes Edina Was Intending To Make, And To What Parcels. From: R Castellano <rcastellano2@outlook.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2019 1:16 PM To: Sharon Allison Subject: Public Data Request: Comprehensive Plan Land Use category changes Wednesday, October 30, 2019 Dear Sharon Allison: I am writing to you as the Responsible Authority of the City of Edina (“the City”). This is a formal request for access to government data under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13. I am writing as a member of the public, requesting public data. If there is a different designee to whom I should direct my data request, please inform me. Background: The 2018 Comprehensive Plan Decennial Update document (“Comp Plan Update”) has not yet been finalized. The main public hearings were held earlier this year at Planning Commission on 4/24/2019 and City Council on 5/7/2019. The hearing draft was dated 3/6/2019. Subsequent to the hearings, the City has online-posted two revised versions of the draft Comp Plan Update, under the link names “Draft Comprehensive Plan 5.8.19” and “October 2019 Comprehensive Plan Draft”, but without revealing what revisions were made. In all three versions, the Comp Plan Update is a draft document of well over 400 pages (436, 436, and 447 pages, respectively) . A second set of public hearings will be held later this year after the completion of the six-month affected and adjacent jurisdiction review period. After receiving final Council approval, the Comp Plan Update will then be submitted to the Metropolitan Council (“Met Council”) for Met Council review and approval. Having earlier requested an extension of the submittal deadline, the City is now required to submit the Comp Plan Update to the Met Council by 12/31/2019. In addition, three Small Area Plans (“The 3 SAPs”) have already, individually, received final approval by City Council (Greater Southdale on 12/18/2018, 70th & Cahill on 1/8/2019, and 50th & France on 4/2/2019), but are nonetheless not yet able to be placed into effect, as the Met Council requires that the City hold these until after the City Council gives final approval to the Comp Plan Update, at which time the Comp Plan Update and The 3 SAPs will then be submitted together for Met Council approval and permission to place into effect. The 3 SAPs are incorporated by reference into the Comp Plan Update. Email String: Oct.30-Dec.27 2019 Jan. 3, 2020: Edina’s Response Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 35 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps I seek access to all of the data that document all of the changes in Land Use Category guidance, throughout the city, that the City is planning to communicate to the Met Council in conjunction with the process of obtaining Met Council approval of the Comp Plan Update and The 3 SAPs (“Reclassifications”). This includes Reclassifications by way of The 3 SAPs, and those specific to the Comp Plan Update process. This includes Reclassifications that are represented fully, partially, or not at all, at the time of first submittal of the four documents to the Met Council. This includes, but is not limited to: Land Use Category guidance applied to land, water, air space; Reclassifications from one Land Use Category to a different Category; new assignments of a Land Use Category where previously no Land Use Category was assigned; Reclassifications of full and partial parcels; Reclassifications that could be “lost” in rounding the Land Use category acreage values to the whole numbers shown in the Update. This includes the Land Use Category guidance existing prior to the Reclassifications and the Land Use Category guidance that would become effective upon the Reclassifications, including, but not limited to, number of acres, locations, numerical data, parcel data, district-level data, and fully legible maps not obscured as to parcel data, such as by, but not limited to, reduced size or poor quality resolution that blurs lines or colors. This includes, for example, but is not limited to, the MXC-Mixed Use Center (“MXC”) Land Use Category guidance for the Grandview and the 50th & France Districts. Background: The City has not provided full disclosure. At both the April and May hearings, the City presented only a combined “going forward” total of 69 acres, without a by-district breakdown, and represented that this total was NOT a change from current. However, according to Met Council records (which I obtained through a public data request), it is 7 acres more than the 46 acres at Grandview and 16 acres at 50th & France (for a combined total of 62 acres) that the City reported to the Met Council in 2017. This includes, but is not limited to, the home addresses for each and every Reclassification of R-1 and R-2 property, for example, but not limited to, properties on Maple Road, West 49th Street, and West 50th Street in the 50th and France area, and properties on Hankerson Avenue in the Grandview area. Please note that for each and every Reclassification that is not yet contained in any of the online- posted documents publicly available to-date (The 3 SAPs and the 3 drafts of the Comp Plan Update), this request includes, but is not limited to, any and all data contained in letters, emails, text messages, notes, reports, meeting minutes, etc, I am asking to inspect the data under Minnesota Statutes, section 13.03, subdivision 3. If you determine that you will redact or withhold any otherwise responsive data, please inform me in writing of the specific statutory basis for your denial. If you have any questions or need clarification, please contact me at rcastellano2@outlook.com Sincerely, Roberta Castellano • Available online in the Nov. 6, 2020 City Council Correspondence, see link in Coversheet at: https://edina.novusagenda.com/AgendaPublic/CoverSheet.aspx?ItemID=7265&MeetingID=1100 • Edina’s Jan. 3, 2020 responsive data was a 12/31/2019 version of the CPU. Jan. 3, 2020: Edina’s Response Email String: Oct.30-Dec.27 2019 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 36 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps I. CPU Draft 4 (Base Map 2): The REDLINE. Online-Posted Between Oct27-Nov6, 2019. 1. REDLINE: Newsfeed Obscured Fact of Certain Undisclosed Alterations. • Better Together newsfeed is at: https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/comp-plan-update. Scroll down only about 1 screen or so. These entries are near the top of the newsfeed. • The yellow highlighting is mine. • Circle 1: At some point, Edina posted notice of a redlined version in the works, on its newly contracted adjunct communications website “Better Together Edina”. • Circle 2: Subsequently, Edina posted notice that the redlined version was available online. The description is worded in a very confusing manner, which obscured the fact that Edina made alterations to the Comp Plan Update between March 6 and May 8. o To rephrase Edina’s news post: Redline compares May 8 draft to “October Draft” (dated 9/30/2019). For chapters not changed between March 6 and May 8, then comparison is March 6 to “October draft” (9/30/2019). o What Edina did not disclose: Chapters that were changed “between March 6 and May 8”. There were 3 chapters that Edina changed after the May 7 City Council hearing but backdated to May 7 or earlier. I confronted the City Council about the backdating. 2 1 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 37 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps 2. REDLINE. Screenshot Of Full Map Image. Figure 3.12 Future Land Use map, found on PDF Page 138 of 510, Text Page 3-37. • This draft can be downloaded from a link on Edina’s Comprehensive Plan webpage: https://www.edinamn.gov/647/Comprehensive-Plan • Link title: October 2019 Comprehensive Plan REDLINE (PDF). Currently under the heading “Comprehensive Plan Resources”. • File name as downloaded in Firefox: October-2019-Comprehensive-Plan-REDLINE-PDF • Edina did not disclose that it had made any changes to the map itself. • Edina showed only two changes on the page, but neither one was a change to the map itself: (1) At the top: The date of the draft version. (2) At the bottom: An added comment about Density. • See 50th & France zoom on the next page. 1 2 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 38 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps 3. REDLINE. Zoomed-In. Has Features Of Base Map 2 (See May “8” Draft). Figure 3.12 Future Land Use map, found on PDF Page 138 of 510, Text Page 3-37. • The May “8”, 2019 Draft version of the map re-appears in the REDLINE. (REDLINE was posted between Oct. 27 – Nov. 6, 2019.) (See also: 12-31-2019 in Edina.) Features of Base Map 2 are: 1. The fact that the image is blurry, and the style of the blurriness. 2. The map has unevenly distributed darkened areas. Large, dark area in Country Club (see in large circle at left). 3. Street names, including “Country Club” and the position/location of street names. 4. Blue, green, and pink colors present on residential parcels in the perimeter outside of the 50th & France District (and beyond). • When viewed on-screen, the colors on homes in the outside perimeter stand out even more. • The REDLINE formatting is different. I was not able to zoom the image in as close as with the other Drafts for a screenshot, so this screenshot is not quite as fully zoomed in as the others. Base Map 2 features: The return to a dark and blurry map. Pink, blue, and green colors have reappeared all around the outside periphery (circled). Also, the cul-de-sac at north end of Gorgas Ave. is thick again. Base Map 2 Cul-de-sac widened and parcels colored blue. In the REDLINE, Edina did not report any changes to the map, anywhere in the city. Next: PC Nov. 13 Prior: October Draft Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 39 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps J. Nov. 13, 2019 Planning Commission (“PC”) Public Hearing. 1. Per Edina, This Was The Statutorily-Required Public Hearing. • Item Number VI.B. on the Meeting Agenda. View online. Clicking on Agenda Item opens the Coversheet shown above. • I highlighted in yellow and pointed an arrow to: 1. The statement: “This is the Statutory required Public Hearing for final approval of the 2018 Comprehensive Plan.” 2. The Link to the Land Use chapter (4th down under “Attachments”). • Direct link to Coversheet: https://edina.novusagenda.com/AgendaPublic/CoverSheet.aspx?ItemID=7341&MeetingID=1087 • Coversheets do not download as a file. To save a copy, you must do a page print. • Download the Land Use Chapter from “Land Use” link. File name downloaded in Firefox as: 03_Land_Use_Chapter_09-30-19 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 40 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps 2. (Base Map 3, Version 2): PC Nov.13 Public Hearing Draft. Edina Altered Colors On Base Map 3, But Did Not Give Chapter 3 A New Revision Date. Figure 3.12 Future Land Use map, found on PDF Page 26 of 48, Text Page 3-26, of Chapter 3: Land Use. (Regarding the change in pagination from previous, Edina posted chapters individually this time.) • The map appears to be almost the same image as compared to Draft 3 (“the October Draft” dated 9-30- 2019.), except for pale green and blue on 1-2 parcels south of 50th & France. I encircled the area and marked with arrow. • Review the Features of original Base Map 3: Best brightness and clarity of all map versions. Highest quality resolution of all map versions. Complete* absence of pink, blue, and green colors on single-family homes and single- family-attached homes in perimeter outside of 50th & France District. *But In the above map, I have documented some color alteration to Base Map 3. Cul-de-sac at N end of Gorgas Ave is maintained, and not opened into MXC. Negative feature: Altered (thickened) solid black line of undisclosed purpose, which overlaps onto Maple Road properties, and also conceals the coloration of parcel portions that are underneath it. See in the small circle: These blue and green colorations were not present in October 2019 map. Compare to no color in Oct 2019 (dated 9-30-2019) Base Map 3, Version 2, colors altered Gorgas Ave. Cul-de-sac maintained. Next: CC Dec.3 Prior: REDLINE Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 41 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps 3. During PC Public Hearing, Consultant Haila Maze Testified To Importance Of “Extra Clear” “High-Rez” Map For Public. https://youtu.be/bmxHwnmPgVw?t=2340 Haila: [addressing Planning Commission during initial presentation] 39.00 “…as a mathematical use of acreage. Anyone who’s interested, and wants to spend some time in more detail, I’ve offered to offline spend time on walking through those and how this work.” 39.11 “But again, the focus of the Land Use Chapter is on this map itself, which is the point of making sure it’s extra clear to the public, and to you, including making sure it’s available in high-res version, and the, and the categories and definitions of the guidance, those would be the ones used to move forward with decisions.” Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 42 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps 4. Consultant Haila Maze Also Testified That Public Comments At Both Hearings Would Be Submitted To Met Council. https://youtu.be/bmxHwnmPgVw?t=2424 Haila: [addressing the Planning Commission during the initial presentation] 40.24 Um, as Bill was saying, we’re, this is winding to a close. It’s not quite there yet, but we’re getting close. We have today’s review by Planning Commission and City Council date. And with a plan to submit as scheduled by extension to Met Council by the end of this year. Any comments reserved received during this and the City Council will be sort of wrapped up into a package that will be digitally submitted to the Met Council. Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 43 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps K. Ch. 3 Draft 5 (Base Map 3, Version 2): for Dec. 3, 2019 City Council (“CC”) Public Hearing. Map appears to be the same version as for PC Nov.13. Figure 3.12 Future Land Use Map, PDF Page 26 of 48. • The only way to access this draft is through Edina’s NovusAgenda page, via a link on the Agenda Item Coversheet for the December 3, 2019 City Council Public Hearing: https://edina.novusagenda.com/AgendaPublic/CoverSheet.aspx?ItemID=7394&MeetingID=1101 • See lower left of Coversheet for list of attachment links. • File name as downloaded in Firefox: 03_Land_Use_Chapter_09-30-19.docx_UPDATED_11.21.19 • The fact of chapter revision was not disclosed on the Coversheet. • Color alterations are the same as for the Nov. 13 Planning Commission Public Hearing. See in the small circle. Same as PC: These blue and green colorations were not present in October 2019 map. Base Map 3, Version 2: colors altered Next: Dec.31 @Edina Prior: PC Nov.13 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 44 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps L. CPU Draft 6 (Base Map 2): Date Changed To 12-31-2019. Edina Switched Maps Again, This Time AFTER Final Hearings, Re-Inserting Color Changes. See Edina’s Archives. Edina States That It Submitted This Draft To The Met Council. Figure 3.12 Future Land Use Map, PDF Page 26 of 48 • Was initially publicly available only through Edina’s online document archive called “EdinaDocs”, and I downloaded it from there: https://www.edinamn.gov/964/Edina-Docs-Document-Archive • Once in the portal, below is the file pathway: “To learn more or visit the Edina Docs Document Archive, click here.” > Planning Folder > Comprehensive Plan Met Council Submittal December 2019 > 03 Land Use Chapter 12-31-19 • This bears all the familiar hallmarks of Base Map 2 with (May 8 Draft, and the REDLINE): Very Dark and patchy dark; blurry: location of street names; Addition of pink, blue, and green colors which changes the guiding policy of parcels; Opening and color at top Gorgas Ave cul-de-sac. • Edina gave all chapters a new date of 12-31-2019, suggesting undisclosed revisions, such as to the map above. I discovered that Edina made changes to the Water Chapter, as well. Did Edina make other undisclosed changes AFTER completion of the hearings? Base Map 2 Street names and placement. Colors have returned Gorgas Ave cul-de-sac is blue and wide again. Solid black line is precise thickness again, not uneven, but so blurry and hard to see. Dark and blurry. Next: Dec.31 @MetCouncil Prior: CC Dec.3 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 45 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps M. CPU Draft 7 (Base Map 2, Version 2): Dated 12-31-2019. As Received By Met Council On 12-31-2019. Altered Again, Much More Blurry. Figure 3.12 Future Land Use Map, PDF Page 26 of 48 • Obtained through a public data request, and received by email from Michael Larson, Met Council, on 2-18-2020. • File name: Edina 2040 CPU Chapter 3 • This map version bears all the hallmarks of Base Map 2, (May 8 Draft, REDLINE, and 12-31-2019 version in EdinaDocs archives, BUT it is MUCH more severely blurred, so I am calling it “Base Map 2, Version 2”. • Did Edina make other undisclosed changes prior to submittal to Met Council? Base Map 2, Version 2. Version 2 is more heavily blurred. Street names and placement. Colors are all around the outside, but harder to see due to more severe blurring. Gorgas Ave cul-de- sac. Blue color is there, with wide opening at top. Compare to thin parcel boundaries nearby. Solid black line is precise thickness, not uneven, but so blurry and hard to see. Dark and so blurry. Next: Feb.7, 2020 @MetCouncil Prior: Dec.31 @Edina Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 46 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps N. On January 3, 2020, I Received Notification From Edina Of Data Responsive To My Public Data Request (“PDR”) Of Oct. 30, 2019. The Responsive Data Was A 12-31-2019 Version Of The CPU. 1. Below Is Context, Record Of Communication From After Filing PDR On Oct. 30, 2019, Through Dec. 27, 2019. From: R Castellano <rcastellano2@outlook.com> Sent: Friday, December 27, 2019 12:36 PM To: Sharon Allison Subject: RE: Public Data Request: Comprehensive Plan Land Use category changes Thanks Sharon. Let me know after you have had a chance to connect with Cary. Sincerely, Roberta Castellano From: Sharon Allison <SAllison@EdinaMN.gov> Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2019 8:37 AM To: R Castellano <rcastellano2@outlook.com> Subject: RE: Public Data Request: Comprehensive Plan Land Use category changes Roberta - I forwarded your email to Cary on Saturday, 12/21; he is, however, out all this week. Sharon Allison, City Clerk 952-826-0408 | Fax 952-826-0390 SAllison@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov From: R Castellano <rcastellano2@outlook.com> Sent: Friday, December 20, 2019 3:09 PM To: Sharon Allison <SAllison@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: RE: Public Data Request: Comprehensive Plan Land Use category changes EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Sharon, Oct. 30 PDR Jan. 3, 2020: Edina’s Response Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 47 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps I am writing today (Dec. 20) to check on the status of my Oct. 30 data request (at the bottom of this string). Following your query to me in our Nov. 6-Nov. 7 email exchange, below, there has been no further word from you regarding any questions that Community Development Director/Director of Planning Cary Teague may have about my data request. Nor have I heard directly from Cary. The Comp Plan approval process has continued to move forward, and the City Council voted on Dec. 3 to approve submittal of the Comp Plan Update to the Metropolitan Council. I want you to know that I stand ready for questions. I also want to add here, that I would like this to be simple, and yet clear. There should be sufficient detail to ensure that there is no ambiguity as to what these Land Use Category guidance changes are, where they are, and whether they are considered by the City to have been made effective with a Small Area Plan, or more recently with the Comp Plan Update. Could you please check on the status of my data request and get back to me about it? Thanks for any help. Sincerely, Roberta Castellano From: R Castellano <rcastellano2@outlook.com> Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2019 12:25 PM To: Sharon Allison <SAllison@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: RE: Public Data Request: Comprehensive Plan Land Use category changes Sharon, Thank you very much for contacting me. I must receive the questions, whether in a meeting or via email. So, let’s not rule out email, as it could work out just fine. If Cary has some questions, please forward them to me. I will certainly and thoughtfully consider the questions and get back to you about them. Thanks again. Sincerely, Roberta Castellano From: Sharon Allison <SAllison@EdinaMN.gov> Sent: Wednesday, November 6, 2019 3:29 PM To: R Castellano <rcastellano2@outlook.com> Subject: RE: Public Data Request: Comprehensive Plan Land Use category changes Roberta – Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 48 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps I met with Cary and he has some questions on your data request. Are you available to meet with Cary, Liz and I to answer questions that would make your request clearer. We feel that a meeting would be best as emails may not add any clarity. Looking forward to hearing from you. Sharon Allison, City Clerk 952-826-0408 | Fax 952-826-0390 SAllison@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov From: R Castellano <rcastellano2@outlook.com> Sent: Monday, November 4, 2019 2:15 PM To: Sharon Allison <SAllison@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: RE: Public Data Request: Comprehensive Plan Land Use category changes EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Sharon, Thank you very much. I appreciate the acknowledgement of receipt along with the action taken on my request. Sincerely, Roberta Castellano From: Sharon Allison <SAllison@EdinaMN.gov> Sent: Monday, November 4, 2019 11:16 AM To: R Castellano <rcastellano2@outlook.com> Subject: RE: Public Data Request: Comprehensive Plan Land Use category changes Roberta – Your data request was forwarded to Cary in Planning. We will follow up with you if there are any questions. Sharon Allison, City Clerk 952-826-0408 | Fax 952-826-0390 SAllison@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 49 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps From: R Castellano <rcastellano2@outlook.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2019 1:16 PM To: Sharon Allison <SAllison@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Public Data Request: Comprehensive Plan Land Use category changes EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Wednesday, October 30, 2019 Dear Sharon Allison: I am writing to you as the Responsible Authority of the City of Edina (“the City”). This is a formal request for access to government data under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13. I am writing as a member of the public, requesting public data. If there is a different designee to whom I should direct my data request, please inform me. Background: The 2018 Comprehensive Plan Decennial Update document (“Comp Plan Update”) has not yet been finalized. The main public hearings were held earlier this year at Planning Commission on 4/24/2019 and City Council on 5/7/2019. The hearing draft was dated 3/6/2019. Subsequent to the hearings, the City has online-posted two revised versions of the draft Comp Plan Update, under the link names “Draft Comprehensive Plan 5.8.19” and “October 2019 Comprehensive Plan Draft”, but without revealing what revisions were made. In all three versions, the Comp Plan Update is a draft document of well over 400 pages (436, 436, and 447 pages, respectively). A second set of public hearings will be held later this year after the completion of the six-month affected and adjacent jurisdiction review period. After receiving final Council approval, the Comp Plan Update will then be submitted to the Metropolitan Council (“Met Council”) for Met Council... See Complete PDR At October 30, 2019 Entry Jan.3, 2020: Edina’s Response Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 50 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps 2. Edina Delayed Responsive Data Until AFTER Completing Public Hearing Process And AFTER Submittal Of CPU To Met Council. Below Is January 3, 2020 Email From Edina, Sent Separately, and Thus Detached, From Context Of Existing Email String. Responsive Data Was Copy Of CPU. From: R Castellano <rcastellano2@outlook.com> Sent: Friday, January 3, 2020 2:13 PM To: Cary Teague; Liz Olson Cc: Sharon Allison Subject: RE: Data Request Cary, Ok, thanks for letting me know. Sure, I will just pick up the USB drive. Liz, I could stop by your office today/Friday at 4:15pm, and I would pay cash as usual. Would that time work for you? Sincerely, Roberta From: Cary Teague <cteague@EdinaMN.gov> Sent: Friday, January 3, 2020 11:47 AM To: R Castellano (rcastellano2@outlook.com) <rcastellano2@outlook.com>; Liz Olson <LKOlson@EdinaMN.gov> Cc: Sharon Allison <SAllison@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Data Request Hi Roberta, In your recent data request, you asked for all the documentation for land use changes that the city is submitting to the met council for the 2018 comp. plan. We now have that information for you available to review…it is over 4,600 pages. It is the complete submittal made to the Met Council for the 2018 update. Liz has the USB drive available for you to pick up now for $25. Please let Liz know if you would like to pick up the jump drive or come in to review the files. Cary Cary Teague, AICP, Community Development Director 952-826-0460 | Fax 952-826-0389 | Cell 952-292-0236 4801 W. 50th St. | Edina, MN 55424 cteague@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov/Planning • See comments on next page. • Clearly, Edina has no intention of publicly disclosing the data prior to the Met Council’s approval of the Comprehensive Plan Update. Oct. 30 PDR Email: Oct. 30 – Dec.27 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps R. Castellano, Revised 3-9-2020, Page 51 of 51 Return to: Table of Contents or List of Drafts and Maps O. CPU Draft 8 (Base Map 4): Dated 2-7-2020. Received By Met Council On 2-14-2020. Street Name Placements Are Unique To This Map. This Is A Different Base Map. Figure 3.12 Future Land Use Map, PDF Page 26 of 48 • Obtained through a public data request, and received by email from Michael Larson, Met Council, on 2-18-2020. • File name: Edina 2040 CPU Chapter 3 2020.02.14 revision • If I am reading the file name correctly, it was received by Met Council on 2-14-2020. • This is a unique base map. Does not match any of the prior maps: The street names are the most pronounced difference. But also, it is unique in light/dark tones, lighter washes of color, overall lighter than Base Map 2, significant blurring. • Did Edina make any other undisclosed changes in its revised submittal? Gorgas Ave cul-de- sac. Wide opening at top, but nearly impossible to see. Color appears as faintest wash. Colors are all around the outside, but so hard to see, are washed out, diffuse. A new map. Calling it Base Map 4 Street names and placement are unique to this map. Solid black line looks different on west side. More image tweaking. Start Over Prior: 12/31/2019 @MetCouncil Page - 1 Joint Business Item No. 2020-149 Community Development Committee Meeting date: June 1, 2020 Environment Committee Meeting date: June 9, 2020 For the Metropolitan Council meeting of June 24, 2020 Subject: City of Edina 2040 Comprehensive Plan and Comprehensive Sewer Plan, Review File 22400- 1 District(s), Member(s): District 5, Molly Cummings Policy/Legal Reference: Metropolitan Land Planning Act (Minn. Stat. § 473.175), Minn. Stat. § 473.513 Staff Prepared/Presented: Michael Larson, Senior Planner (651-602-1407) Angela R. Torres, Local Planning Assistance Manager (651-602-1566) Kyle Colvin, Engineering Programs, Manager (651-602-1151) Division/Department: Community Development / Regional Planning Environmental Services / Technical Services Proposed Action That the Metropolitan Council adopt the attached Advisory Comments and Review Record and take the following actions: Recommendations of the Community Development Committee 1. Authorize the City of Edina to place its 2040 Comprehensive Plan into effect. 2. Revise the City’s forecasts upward as shown in Table 1 of the attached Review Record. 3. Revise the City’s affordable housing need allocation for 2021-2030 to 1,804 units. 4. Advise the City to implement the advisory comments in the Review Record for Water Supply. Recommendation of the Environment Committee 1. Approve the City of Edina’s Comprehensive Sewer Plan. 2. Prior to adoption, the final Plan needs to include a map that clearly identifies the local pipe ID that corresponds to the connection to the regional system. Page - 2 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Advisory Comments The following Advisory Comments are part of the Council action authorizing the City of Edina to implement its 2040 Comprehensive Plan (Plan). Community Development Committee 1. As stated in the Local Planning Handbook, the City must take the following steps: a. Adopt the Plan in final form after considering the Council’s review recommendations as contained in the body of this report. b. Submit one hard copy and one electronic copy of the Plan to the Council. The electronic copy must be submitted as one unified file. c. Submit to the Council a copy of the City Council resolution evidencing final adoption of the Plan. 2. The Local Planning Handbook also states that local governments must formally adopt their comprehensive plans within nine months after the Council’s final action. If the Council has recommended changes to the Plan, local governments should incorporate those recommended changes into the Plan or respond to the Council before “final adoption” of the comprehensive plan by the governing body of the local governmental unit. (Minn. Stat. § 473.858, subd. 3) 3. Local governments must adopt official controls as identified in their 2040 comprehensive plans and must submit copies of the official controls to the Council within 30 days after the official controls are adopted. (Minn. Stat. § 473.865, subd. 1) 4. Local governmental units cannot adopt any official controls or fiscal devices that conflict with their comprehensive plans or which permit activities in conflict with the Council’s metropolitan system plans (Minn. Stat. §§ 473.864, subd. 2; 473.865, subd. 2). If official controls conflict with comprehensive plans, the official controls must be amended within 9 months following amendments to comprehensive plans (Minn. Stat. § 473.865, subd. 3). Environment Committee 1. The Council-approved Comprehensive Sewer Plan becomes effective only after the Plan receives final approval from the local governmental unit’s governing body. After the Plan receives final approval from the City and the Comprehensive Sewer Plan becomes effective, the City may implement its Plan to alter, expand, or improve its sewage disposal system consistent with the Council-approved Comprehensive Sewer Plan. 2. A copy of the City Council resolution adopting its 2040 comprehensive plan, including its Comprehensive Sewer Plan, must be submitted to the Council. Page - 3 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Background The City of Edina is located in southeastern Hennepin County. It is surrounded by the communities of St. Louis Park, Minneapolis, Richfield, Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Minnetonka, and Hopkins. The City submitted its 2040 Comprehensive Plan (Plan) to the Council for review to meet the Metropolitan Land Planning Act requirements (Minn. Stat. §§ 473.851 to 473.871) and the Council’s 2015 System Statement requirements. Review Authority & Rationale Minn. Stat. § 473.175 directs the Metropolitan Council to review a local government’s comprehensive plan and provide a written statement to the local government regarding the Plan’s: • Conformance with metropolitan system plans • Consistency with the adopted plans and policies of the Council • Compatibility with the plans of adjacent governmental units and plans of affected special districts and school districts By resolution, the Council may require a local government to modify its comprehensive plan if the Council determines that “the plan is more likely than not to have a substantial impact on or contain a substantial departure from metropolitan system plans” (Minn. Stat. § 473.175, subd. 1). Each local government unit shall adopt a policy plan for the collection, treatment, and disposal of sewage for which the local government unit is responsible, coordinated with the Metropolitan Council's plan, and may revise the same as often as it deems necessary (Minn. Stat. § 473.513). The attached Review Record details the Council’s assessment of the Plan’s conformance, consistency, and compatibility, and is summarized below. Review Standard Review Area Plan Status Conformance Regional system plan for Parks Conforms Conformance Regional system plan for Transportation, including Aviation Conforms Conformance Water Resources (Wastewater Services and Surface Water Management) Conforms Consistency with Council Policy Thrive MSP 2040 and Land Use Consistent Consistency with Council Policy Forecasts Consistent, with the proposed revisions Consistency with Council Policy 2040 Housing Policy Plan Consistent Consistency with Council Policy Water Supply Consistent Consistency with Council Policy Community and Subsurface Sewage Treatment Systems (SSTS) Consistent Compatibility Compatible with the plans of adjacent and affected governmental districts Compatible Thrive Lens Analysis The proposed 2040 comprehensive plan is reviewed against the land use policies in Thrive MSP 2040. To achieve the outcomes identified in Thrive, the metropolitan development guide defines the Land Use Policy for the region and includes strategies for local governments and the Council to implement. These policies and strategies are interrelated and, taken together, serve to achieve the outcomes identified in Thrive. Funding None. Page - 4 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Known Support / Opposition A City resident, Roberta Castellano, has submitted numerous materials to the Council asserting inaccuracies and inconsistencies in the City’s comprehensive planning process. Staff have shared and discussed the information with the City and its consultants. Council staff concluded that the items were a local matter and do not raise concern for regional purposes. Page - 5 REVIEW RECORD City of Edina 2040 Comprehensive Plan Review File No. 22400-1, Business Item No. 2020-149 JT The following Review Record documents how the proposed Plan meets the requirements of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act and conforms to regional system plans, is consistent with regional policies, and is compatible with the plans of adjacent and affected jurisdictions. Conformance with Regional Systems The Council reviews plans to determine conformance with metropolitan system plans. The Council has reviewed the City’s Plan and finds that it conforms to the Council’s regional system plans for Regional Parks, Transportation (including Aviation), and Water Resources. Regional Parks and Trails Reviewer: Colin Kelly, Community Development (CD) - Regional Parks (651-602-1361) The Plan conforms to the 2040 Regional Parks Policy Plan (RPPP). Three Rivers Park District is the Park Implementing Agency for Regional Parks System components in Edina, for which the Plan accurately describes the Regional Parks System components. Regional Trails located within the City include the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail and the CP Rail Regional Trail Search Corridor (Figure 1). There are no state or federal recreation lands within the City. Regional Transportation, Transit, and Aviation Reviewer: Russ Owen, Metropolitan Transportation Services (MTS) (651-602-1724) The Plan conforms to the 2040 Transportation Policy Plan (TPP) adopted in 2015. It accurately reflects transportation system components of the TPP. The Plan is also consistent with Council policies regarding community roles, the needs of non-automobile transportation, access to job concentrations, and the needs of freight. Roadways The Plan conforms to the Highways system element of the TPP. The Plan accurately accounts for the metropolitan highway system of principal arterials, which include U.S. 169, TH 100, TH 62, and I-494 including planned additions and improvements identified in the Current Revenue Scenario, and any right-of-way preservation needs. The Plan identifies a new interchange at I-494 and France Avenue that is proposed by the City but has not yet been reviewed by the MnDOT/Metropolitan Council joint interchange committee. However, the Plan acknowledges that this interchange must be submitted for approval under the Highway Interchange Request Review Procedure before it is added to the TPP or constructed. The Plan accurately reflects the regional functional classification map of A-minor arterials and has delineated major and minor collectors. The Plan identifies all the required characteristics of the City’s roadways, including existing and future functional class, right-of-way preservation needs, and existing and forecasted traffic volumes for principal and A-minor arterials. Forecasting is consistent with regional methodology. The Plan also includes guidelines on how access will be managed for principal and A-minor arterials. The Plan identifies roadway and corridor studies that include recommendations regarding alignments, changes in access, and/or changes in land use. They Page - 6 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL include the east-west connector corridor which would allow individuals to make trips east-west in the City, and this would be north of I-494. The Plan accurately describes the status of such facilities, including needs for right-of-way and the likelihood and timing of funding. Transit The Plan conforms to the Transit system element of the TPP. It shows the location of existing transit routes and facilities and acknowledges the City is within Transit Market Areas II and III. The Plan is consistent with the policies of the Transit system element of the TPP. The Plan addresse s community roles related to its Community Designation, as well as the opportunities and challenges related to its Transit Market Areas. The Plan strengthens the existing transit system and lays the groundwork to support improved transit services. Aviation The Plan conforms to Aviation system element of the TPP. The Plan includes policies that protect regional airspace from obstructions and describes how off-site air navigation aids will be protected. Bicycling and Walking The Plan is consistent with the Bicycling and Pedestrian chapter of the TPP. The Plan identifies existing and future segments of, and connections to, the Regional Bicycle Transportation Network (RBTN) and regional trails. The Plan identifies Tier 1 and Tier 2 corridors as well as Tier 1 and Tier 2 alignments. The Plan is also consistent with Bicycle and Pedestrian policies of the TPP by planning for local pedestrian and bicycle connections to transit, regional trails, regional job concentrations, and other regional destinations as identified on the RBTN map. Freight The Plan is consistent with Freight policies of the TPP. The Plan identifies the needs of freight movement in and through the City, including accessibility to freight terminals and facilities. There is one Class 1 railroad (CP Rail) which runs north and south over four miles of the City. Some of the freight issues include Trunk Highway system congestion and Freeway interchange queues. Transportation Analysis Zones (TAZs) The Plan conforms to the TPP regarding TAZ allocations. The City’s TAZ allocations for employment, households, and population appropriately sum to the Council’s city-wide forecast totals for all forecast years. The City’s planned land uses and areas identified for development and redevelopment can accommodate the TAZ forecasted allocations in the Plan, and at densities consistent with the City’s community designation in Thrive. Water Resources Wastewater Service Reviewer: Kyle Colvin, Environmental Services (ES) – Engineering Programs (651-602-1151) The Plan conforms to the 2040 Water Resources Policy Plan (WRPP). It represents the City’s guide for future growth and development through the year 2040. It includes growth forecasts that are consistent with the Council’s accepted forecasts for population, households, and employment. Current wastewater treatment services are provided to the City by the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES). The majority of wastewater generated within the City is conveyed by Council Interceptors 1-MN-342, 1-MN-343, 1-MN-344, 1-MN-345, 1-RF-490, 1-RF-491, and is treated at the Council’s Metropolitan Wastewater Treatment Plant located in St. Paul. A small area of southern Edina is provided service through interceptor 3-BN-499 where the flow is conveyed to, and treated at, Page - 7 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL the Seneca Wastewater Treatment Plant located in Eagan. The Plan projects that the City will have 29,800 sewered households and 56,100 sewered employees by 2040. The Metropolitan Disposal System with its scheduled improvements has or will have adequate capacity to serve the City’s growth forecasts. The Plan provides a 2040 sanitary flow projection for each major sewer district within the City. The rationale for the projections was not provided in the Plan other than a statement that the 2040 design flow is calculated based on estimated 2040 development conditions. Table 7.3 “Capacity and Design Flow for Existing Trunk Sewer” (most recently proposed as Appendix D1 in the revised Plan) contains projected 2040 flow figures and percent capacity utilization of the local collection system via pipe ID number, by MCES meter-shed service area. However, the appendix does not include a map identifying the local pipe ID’s that correspond to the connection to the MCES meter -shed. The Metropolitan Council is committing to provide the level of wastewater service based on the sewered forecasts as stated in the sewer element of the Plan. The Land Use Plan reflects an overall minimum residential sewered density that is consistent with Council policy for future sewered residential growth for Urban communities. The Plan defines the City’s goals, policies, and strategies for preventing and reducing excessive inflow and infiltration (I/I) mostly in the local municipal (city) sanitary sewer systems. The Plan includes a summary of activities and programs intended to mitigate I/I in both the public and private property systems including system inspection and evaluation. The City’s inspection program schedule covers the entire local collection system every 12 years. Mitigation work includes manhole and pipeline sealing, spot repair or replacement of public collection system pipelines, and private property sump pump and foundation drain disconnection if discovered during plan and permit review. The Plan includes a summary of the City’s 2017-2021 Capital Improvement Program that includes funding sources for sanitary sewer system rehabilitation that includes various projects related to pipeline rehabilitation and replacement. It also includes the consideration of including the installation of sump pump collection systems as part of the City’s street rehabilitation program. The Plan describes the requirements and standards for minimizing I/I and references City Ordinance (10-464) that prohibits the discharge of surface water, groundwater, or other water from roofs, yards, lawns, streets or alleys, foundation drains, or sump pumps to the sanitary sewer system. Ordinance (10-465) requires the removal of such prohibited connections immediately after discovery. If after 30 days the prohibited connection is not removed, the City will impose a surcharge to the property until the connection is eliminated. The Plan describes the sources, extent, and significance of existing I/I within the entire City wastewater collection system and provides a description of an implementation plan for preventing and eliminating excessive I/I from entering both the public and private collection systems. The Plan states that 55% of all residential units within the City were built prior to 1970 when clay tile pipe services were commonly used. Eighty percent of all detached single-family homes within the City were built prior to 1970.The significance of clay tile pipe is that as it ages, it can become more susceptible to I/I. The Plan states that a model in 2016 estimated that approximately 25% of the City’s wastewater flow is attributable to I/I. The Plan did not characterize the impact that significant wet weather events had on the City’s Peak flow. Sewer Element Comments The Sewer Element of the Plan has been reviewed against the requirements for Comprehensive Sewer Plans for Urban communities. It was found to be complete and consistent with Council polices. Upon adoption of the Plan by the City, the action of the Council to approve the Sewer Plan becomes effective. At that time, the City may implement its Plan to alter, expand, or improve its sewage disposal system consistent with the approved Sewer Plan. A copy of the City Council Resolution adopting its Plan needs to be submitted to the Metropolitan Council for its records. Page - 8 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Advisory Comment The Plan does not include a map identifying the local pipe ID numbers that correspond to the connection to the MCES meter-shed. The final Plan needs to include a map that clearly identifies the local pipe ID that corresponds to the connection to the regional system. Surface Water Management Reviewer: Judy Sventek, ES – Water Resources (651-602-1156) The Plan is consistent with Council policy requirements and in conformance with the Council’s 2040 Water Resources Policy Plan for local surface water management. The Plan satisf ies the local surface water management requirements for 2040 comprehensive plans. Edina lies within the oversight boundaries of the Minnehaha Creek and Nine Mile Creek Watershed Districts. The City submitted a draft Local Water Management Plan (LWMP) update to the Council on January 18, 2018. Council Water Resources staff reviewed and commented on the draft LWMP to the City and Watersheds in a letter dated February 23, 2018. The LWMP was approved by the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District on March 21, 2018 and by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District July 26, 2018. The City adopted the final LWMP on December 3, 2019. The Plan incorporates the City’s LWMP in Appendix D. Consistency with Council Policies The Council reviews plans to evaluate their apparent consistency with the adopted plans of the Council. Council staff have reviewed the Plan and find that it is consistent with the Council’s policies, as detailed below. Forecasts Reviewer: Todd Graham, CD – Research (651-602-1322) The Plan proposes a forecast revision that is reflected in Tables 2.1, 3.1, and 7.4 of the Plan. The City explains on page 2.4 of the Plan that “the near-term development in Edina and several other cities has outpaced initial estimates due to a robust economy, particularly in terms of market demand for new multifamily housing in developed communities.” Council staff agree that the forecast revision is needed. The previous forecast was based on local land use policies that have substantially changed. The forecast revision is shown in Table 1 below (changes underlined) and will be approved simultaneous with Council action on the Plan. Table 1. City of Edina Forecasts Census 2010 Estimated 2018 Council Forecasts City Proposed Forecast 2020 2030 2040 2020 2030 2040 Population 47,941 52,535 53,700 57,900 59,600 55,000 60,000 63,600 Households 20,672 22,619 23,500 26,000 27,200 24,000 27,700 29,800 Employment 47,457 44,581 51,800 54,000 56,100 51,800 54,000 56,100 With this forecast revision, the 2021-2030 Affordable Housing Need for the City increases. The Plan acknowledges the 2021-2030 affordable housing need allocation of 1,804 units, 751 of which are needed at prices affordable to households earning 30% of AMI or less, 480 of which are needed at prices affordable to households earning between 31 and 50% of AMI, and 573 of which are needed at prices affordable to households earning between 51 and 80% of AMI. Chapter 3 of the Plan describes and inventories land supply for future development and redevelopment (see specifically Table 3.7). Most of the new housing capacity is associated with the supply of mixed use residential land and special districts. In total, Council staff find that the Plan identifies a land supply that more than accommodates the growth forecast at the midpoint of the allowable density ranges. Page - 9 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Thrive MSP 2040 and Land Use Reviewer: Michael Larson, CD – Local Planning Assistance (651-602-1407) The Plan is consistent with Thrive MSP 2040 (Thrive) and its land use policies. The Plan acknowledges the Thrive community designation of Urban (Figure 2). Thrive describes Urban communities as having experienced rapid development during the post-World War II era and exhibit the transition toward the development stage dominated by the influence of the automobile. Urban communities are expected to plan for forecasted population and household growth at average densities of at least 10 units per acre for new development and redevelopment. In addition, Urban communities are expected to target opportunities for more intensive development near regional transit investments at densities and in a manner articulated in the TPP. As illustrated in Figure 3, the City is a fully developed community with only 2% undeveloped land. Approximately 60% of the City is residential. Another 17% of the community is comprised of open space in the form of parks (10%) and golf courses (7%). The City is home to the nation’s first enclosed shopping center, Southdale, the area around which has been evolving into a higher-density, mixed use district. The City includes other mixed-use districts at 50th & France as well as Grandview. Commercial office, industrial, and uses are predominate northwest of the interchange of Interstate 494 and Highway 100. The Plan identifies potential change areas, the largest of which centers around the Greater Southdale District in the southeast portion of the City. This district includes areas along and east of France Avenue as well as along 76th/77th Streets (Figure 3.11 of the Plan). Other change areas include the Grandview District, 44th & France, 50th & France, 70th & Cahill, and Valley View & Wooddale. Each of these districts were the subject of small area plans, which informed the Plan and are included as appendices. The Plan identifies development and redevelopment areas at densities that exceed the Urban density policy minimums. This minimum planned density is consistent with regional Urban land use policies that require an average net residential density of at least 10 units per acre in areas of new development and redevelopment. As shown in Table 2 below, the expected overall density of planned residential growth is a minimum of 30.2 units per acre. Table 2. Planned Residential Density, City of Edina 2018-2040 Change Category Density Net Acres Min Units Max Units Min Max Neighborhood Node* 10 60 3 36 180 High Density Residential 12 60 71 852 4260 Mixed-Use Center** 12 100 5 60 500 Office Residential** 20 75 111 2220 8325 Greater Southdale District Residential 50 100 14 700 1400 Regional Medical Center** 50 100 10 500 1000 Community Activity Center** 90 150 35 3150 5250 TOTALS 249 7512 20915 *30% residential **50% residential Overall Density 30.2 84.0 Page - 10 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Housing Reviewer: Hilary Lovelace, CD – Housing (651-602-1555) The Plan is consistent with the 2040 Housing Policy Plan. As of 2016, the City has more than 23,500 homes including more than 9,300 multifamily units and nearly 14,200 single-family homes. Approximately 6,630 homes are rented. More than 7,500 housing units are currently affordable to households earning under 80% of Area Median Income (AMI); however, nearly 3,900 households earning 80% of AMI or below are paying more than 30% of their income toward housing costs. There are 1,350 units affordable to households with income at or below 30% AMI and more than 1,328 co st burdened households with incomes at or below 30% AMI. The Plan identifies existing housing needs including affordability across a range of household types, accommodating affordability in a high property value community, and accommodating housing needs of a changing population. The City has 560 publicly subsidized housing units, including nearly 400 age- restricted for seniors. The Plan acknowledges the 2021-2030 affordable housing need allocation of 1,804 units; 751 of which are needed at prices affordable to households earning 30% of AMI or less, 480 of which are needed at prices affordable to households earning between 31 and 50% of AMI, and 573 of which are needed at prices affordable to households earning between 51 and 80% of AMI. As shown in Figure 5, the Plan guides sufficient land expected to develop in the 2021-2030 time period at a minimum of eight units per acre to allow for development of at least 3,696 new housing units. The housing implementation plan component of the Plan describes that the City will consider TIF and tax abatement for projects that provide affordable units. The Plan also indicates that the City will continue to refine and possibly expand their existing local 4d pilot program. The City states that they will continue to use and possibly modify their inclusionary zoning policy. Water Supply Reviewer: John D. Clark, ES – Water Supply Planning (651-602-1452) The Plan is consistent with WRPP policies related to water supply, including the policy on sustainable water supplies, the policy on assessing and protecting regional water resources, and the policy on water conservation and reuse. The City had prepared a Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) that was submitted the MN Department of Natural Resources (DNR) in November of 2018. The DNR provided the plan to the Council in December of 2019. At that time, the Council found that version of the plan to be incomplete and inconsistent. An updated version of the LWSP was found to be consistent with the WRPP and is included as an appendix to the 2040 Plan. Advisory Comments To ensure Plan consistency between the DNR and the Council, it is recommended that the the City provide the DNR with the updated version of their LWSP. Community and Subsurface Sewage Treatment Systems (SSTS) Reviewer: Kyle Colvin, ES – Engineering Programs (651-602-1151) The Plan indicates that there are only four individual SSTS and no public or privately -owned Community Wastewater Treatment Systems in operation in the City. Responsibility for SSTS permitting, inspection, and maintenance management has been delegated to Hennepin County, as detailed in Hennepin County Ordinance 19. Page - 11 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Special Resource Protection Solar Access Protection Reviewer: Cameran Bailey, CD – Local Planning Assistance (651-602-1212) The Plan is consistent with statutory requirements (Minn. Stat. § 473.859) and Council policy regarding planning for the protection and development of access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems as required by the Metropolitan Land Planning Act (MLPA). Aggregate Resource Protection Reviewer: Cameran Bailey, CD – Local Planning Assistance (651-602-1212) The Plan identifies, consistent with the Council’s aggregate resources inventory information contained in Minnesota Geological Survey Information Circular 46, that there were historically a number of natural aggregate resource deposits within the City. All identified aggregate resource deposit areas have subsequently either been mined or urbanized. Historic Preservation Reviewer: Michael Larson, CD – Local Planning Assistance (651-602-1407) The Plan addresses historic and cultural resources as required by the Metropolitan Land Planning Act in Chapter 13, Heritage Preservation. The Plan includes heritage preservation goals and policies, a description of existing resources and their historic context, and the process by which heritage resources gain landmark designation. Plan Implementation Reviewer: Michael Larson, CD – Local Planning Assistance (651-602-1407) The Plan addresses implementation in Chapter 15, Implementation. This chapter summarizes implementation needs from other Plan elements; and identifies responsibilities, tools, official controls, implementation actions, and the Plan amendment process. Table 15.1 of the Plan organizes implementation strategies and actions by policy area, timeline, and lead/coordinating agencies. The City’s capital improvement program is included as an appendix. Compatibility with Plans of Adjacent Governmental Units and Plans of Affected Special Districts and School Districts The proposed Plan is compatible with the plans of adjacent jurisdictions. No compatibility issues with plans of adjacent governmental units and plans of affected special districts and school districts were identified. Documents Submitted for Review In response to the 2015 System Statement, the City submitted the following documents for review: • December 31, 2019: Edina 2040 Comprehensive Plan • February 14, 2020: Revised Comprehensive Plan Responding to Council Incomplete Items f or Wastewater, Transportation, Land Use, Housing, and Water Supply. • April 16, 2020: Revised Water Resources Chapter and Updated Future Land Use Map Attachments Figure 1: Location Map with Regional Systems Figure 2: Thrive MSP 2040 Community Designations Figure 3: Existing Land Use Figure 4: 2040 Future Land Use Figure 5: Land Guided for Affordable Housing Page - 12 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Figure 1. Location Map with Regional Systems Page - 13 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Figure 2. Thrive MSP 2040 Community Designations Page - 14 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Figure 3. Existing Land Use Page - 15 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Figure 4. 2040 Future Land Use Page - 16 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Figure 5. Land Guided for Affordable Housing Print AgendaMEETING OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Monday | June 15, 2020 Metroplitan Council | 4:00 PM NOTICE: Governor Walz has declared a peacetime emergency (Emergency Executive Order 20-01) in response to COVID-19 and the Metropolitan Council Chair has determined it is not practical or prudent to conduct an in-person Community Development Committee meeting for reasons stated in the Governor’s Emergency Executive Order. Accordingly, Community Development Committee members will participate in this meeting via telephone or other electronic means and the Community Development Committee meeting will be conducted under Minnesota Statutes section 13D.021 at the date, and time stated above. Members of the public may monitor this meeting by using this call-in number (855)282-6330 and Passcode 1463339345. This meeting will be streamed live and recorded. We encourage you to monitor the meeting remotely. If you have comments about a matter on the agenda, please submit via email to public.info@metc.state.mn.us. AGENDA I.CALL TO ORDER II.APPROVAL OF AGENDA III.APPROVAL OF MINUTES – Roll Call May 18, 2020 of the regular meeting of the Community Development Committee IV.BUSINESS 1.2020-149 JT: City of Edina 2040 Comprehensive Plan and Comprehensive Sewer Plan, Review File 22400-1 (Michael Larson 651-602-1407) [presentation] Roll Call 2. 2020-150 JT: City of St. Paul Park 2040 Comprehensive Plan and Comprehensive Sewer Plan, Review File 22308-1 (Patrick Boylan 651-602-1438) [presentation] Roll Call 3.2020-151 City of Lakeland Shores 2040 Comprehensive Plan, Review File 22218-1 (Jake Reilly 651-602-1822) [presentation] Roll Call 4.2020-155 Livable Communities Demonstration Account Pre-Development Funding Recommendations (Hannah Gary 651-602-1633) [presentation] Roll Call 5. 2020-156 Livable Communities Demonstration Account – Transit Oriented Development Pre-Development Funding Recommendations (Stephen Klimek 651- 602-1541) [presentation] Roll Call 6. Page 1 of 2 https://metrocouncil.org/getdoc/a500a151-e647-452f-8615-1ee2d7bb9206/Agenda.aspx 6/12/2020 2020-171 Livable Communities Ace Tax Base Revitalization Account Grant Recommendations (Marcus Martin 651-602-1054) [presentation] Roll Call 7.2020-172 Metro-Scale Climate Leader, Global Covenant of Mayors (GCoM) for Climate and Energy (Eric Wojchik 651-602-1330) [presentation] Roll Call 8.2020-141 JT: 2020 Budget Amendment – 2nd Quarter (Heather Aagesen-Huebner 651-602-1728) Roll Call 9.2020-173 Establish 2020 Public Hearing Date for the Public Housing Agency Annual Plan (Terri Smith 651-602-1187) Roll Call V.INFORMATION 1.Regional Parks System Additions Project: Boundary Adjustments (Emmett Mullin 651-602-1360; Jessica Lee 651-602-1621) [presentation] VI.ADJOURNMENT JT Joint business item; presented at two or more committees prior to being presented at Council SW Action taken by Committee and Council the same week * Additional materials included for items on published agenda ** Additional business item added following publication of agenda *** Backup materials available at the meeting Page 2 of 2 https://metrocouncil.org/getdoc/a500a151-e647-452f-8615-1ee2d7bb9206/Agenda.aspx 6/12/2020 City of Edina Correspondence Submission If you are leaving comments for a public hearing being heard by Council or the Planning Commission, go to https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/public-hearings Correspondence Selection * Data Practices Advisory: Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all City Council Members and submitted for inclusion in the next public “Council packet.” Council packets are permanent records of materials prepared for City Council meetings. Council packets are public documents that are available in print, published on the City’s website and maintained in permanent electronic records. You are not required to complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name and street or email address, your comments will not be included in the Council packet. Open Meeting Law City Council Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Council Members cannot engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum of three or more members. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You might also receive a response from a City staff member. Email City Council: If you only want to email the City Council and not send your comments for publishing, contact members at CityCouncil@EdinaMN.gov. Contact Executive Assistant Jennifer Garske, at JGarske@EdinaMN.gov, if you have any questions or require assistance. Council Packet Deadline Correspondence must be received by noon the Friday prior to a City Council meeting in order to ensure it is published in the packet prior to the Council meeting. Submissions after that time may be included in a future Council packet. Name * Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Mayor & City Council Robin Mahler 5120 Hankerson Ave Edina MN 55436 3122886922 no dashes or spaces robinmahler@live.com Comments * File Upload By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above. Mayor Hovland & City Council Members, Attached is an alternative option for the Hankerson development. The footprints could be moved around to accommodate different driveways on hankers, 52nd & the alley. We want something else there. NOT what i being proposed, but structures that compliment the neighborhood. Thank you, Robin Mahler Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png Hankerson Options.pdf 162.2KB 6-16-20 City Council.pdf 60.2KB A “Better Together Edina” Hankerson Plan Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members, neighbors are NOT in favor of these 2 massive buildings with 8-units that are obtrusive to existing homes. Also, no Options have been submitted after numerous requests by Planning Commissioners and City Council Members. Please find the attached option that is more suitable to this Neighborhood, offers a more affordable "Rebuild" to the existing Rambler and 2 Twin Homes. Parking is spread-out and adds only 2 Driveways on Hankerson; 1 Driveway on 52nd and 2 in the Alley-instead of 8. Automobiles therefore are also reduced from 8-16 in the alley to 2-4. Additional benefits include: 1) More reasonable transitions from the Southern apartments and Northern properties and eliminates this large obtrusive 2 building buffer. 2) Rezoning would no longer be required with only 5 units on this .67 acre. 3) This solution keeps with the “Character of the Neighborhood”. 4) The current MN Statues and Edina Variance criteria has not been met, and “The practical difficulty is caused by the applicant’s desire for additional housing”. 5) As Mayor Hovland said, we won’t be putting “10 lbs. of sugar in a 5 lb. bag”. 6) Helps ensure (or improve) Property Values of the Neighborhood! 7) Won’t be replacing a 4-Plex that is too large for current zoning with TWO large 4-Unit Buildings that are longer than the “White House”. This plan submitted by the Neighborhood makes more sense and does not totally block the backyard views of William Avenue Homes. Scanned by CamScanner Scanned by CamScanner Date: June 16, 2020 Agenda Item #: XIII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: From:Scott Neal, City Manager Item Activity: Subject:Announce Members of the Street Funding Task Force CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: INTRODUCTION: Date: June 16, 2020 Agenda Item #: XIV. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Calendar of City Council Meetings and Events Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None; information only. INTRODUCTION: Date Time Meeting/Event Location Tues, June 16 5:30 p.m.Work Session: Parks & Recreation Commission / Arts and Culture Commission Virtual 7:00 p.m.City Council Regular Meeting Virtual Thurs, June 25 7:30 a.m.Housing and Redevelopment Authority Virtual Fri, July 3 INDEPENDENCE DAY Tues, July 7 NO WORK SESSION OR COUNCIL MEETING Tues, July 21 5:30 p.m.Work Session: Street Reconstruction Financing Virtual 7:00 p.m.City Council Regular Meeting Virtual Thurs, July 30 7:30 a.m.Housing and Redevelopment Authority Virtual